Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-23-1986 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY JUNE 23, 1986, 7:00 P.M. (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items t nacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent 0h da. Discussion will be held upon request. ROLL CALL JUN 2 31986 1. 7:09 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - WEST FERNDALE ROAD AN6' l((WA�RI VE (COUNTY ROAD 15) INTERSECTIONS 2. CONSENT AGENDA* APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 3. Regular Fleeting of June 9, 1986 * 4. 1986 Reconvened Board of Review Meeting of June 11, 1986 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPOR4 - JoEllen 11urr Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT * 5. #918 John Nordstrom, 541 Spring Hill Road - Final Subdivision - Resolution 6. #999 Belden/Me 1ine, 3598 North Shore Drive - Variance - Denial Resolution 7. #10'E, Duane Hall, 1869 Shadywood Road - Preliminary Subdivision - Den:4 ", Resolution, * 8. #1019 Ralph Ma_....,son, 2525 Woodhaven Drive - Final Subdivision - Resolution 9. #1022 Charles A. Schall, 605 Park Lane - Variance - Resolution 10. #1026 Mike Hilbelink/John Vogt, 160 Old Crystal Bay Road - Preliminary Subdivision - Resolution 11. #1033 Royal Dossett, 2798 Pheasant Road - Variance - Resolution 12. Zoning Amendment A.) Bed and Breakfast MAYOR'S REPORT 13. Administrator's Compensation Review CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT CABLE TV REPORT CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 14. 3aldur Park Road 15. Animal Control Services 16. C.D.B.G. Request 17. Authority to Authorize Refunds -- Resolution 18. Council Strategic Plan 19. Rate Study Fee Payment *21. Wayzata Country Club/Luce Line Crossing - Resolution AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY JUNE 23, 1986, 7:00 P.M. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Continued *21. Purchase of Park Benches - Bayshire Park *22. Highway 12 Corridor Study - July 8, 1986 *23. Part Time Employment/Liquor Store *24. Part Time Employment/Golf Course *25. Resignation Brian Clark Police Officer *26. Administrator's Information Dakota Rail Navarre Redevelopment Stubbs Bay Lowell's Auto Parts Chicken Joint Facilities Assessment Comparable Worth Fulmer Property CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT LICENSES (27*) BILLS (28*) ADJOURNMENT I 61886.4 M htl3, h1QfiNG JUid 2 3 1966 TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator FROM: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator MY OF NOW DATE: June 18, 1986 SUBJECT: Public Hearing - June 23, 1986 - West Ferndale Intersection Attached for review is information submitted May 12, 1986, regarding the possible closure of one of the West Ferndale and County Road 15 intersections. The information is submitted for review again for the public hearing June 23, 1986 at 7:00 P.M. TO: Mayor and City Cou-cil / FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City AdministratoA� Forwarded continuing to recommend closing the west leg of West Ferndale. The asphalt would be removed, the ground seeded and appropriate posts installed. The City would additionally work with the County to extend the hard surface for an acceleration lane east bound from the eastern leg. Please note attached letter from Alan McDowell objecting to any close off of either leg. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by I seconded by , that Council adopt staff's recommendation for closing of the west leg of West Ferndale to eliminate a potential safety concern and duplicate maintenance. Ayes Nays __ Gfju,f� i TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator 1+1AY i 219II5 FROM: John Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator CITY OF ©RO1, 0 DATE: May 7, 1986 SDBJ: West Ferndale Road Intersection Traffic Control Recently the City of Orono has received complaints from residents on West Ferndale Road regarding the speed of vehicles exiting Shoreline Drive (Co. Rd. 15) onto West Ferndale Road. The problem being that there is such a wide radius on West Ferndale Road (137' only 100' is needed) that vehicles turning south onto West Ferndale Road from Shoreline Drive do not have to reduce there speed substantially to complete the turn. Just south of Shoreline Drive on West Ferndale is a private driveway that serves two residents. Their complaint is that the vehicles exiting Shoreline Drive are doing so at a rate of speed that there have been several near miss's when they pull out of their driveway and they are requesting assisstance from the City to remedy the problem before something does happen. City staff has reviewed the request and has determined that there are some options available for correcting the situation: Option 1. Reduce the width of the West Ferndale Road intersection by placing guard rail posts at the west side of the radius thereby forcing a speed reduction to complete the turn. Costs to install guard rail posts $412. Option 2. Close off West Ferndale Road and reroute traffic to West Ferndale cutoff. Costs to install guard rail.posts $768. Option 3. Close West Ferndale cutoff Road. Cost $532. After reviewing all options it is my recommendation to close West Ferndale Road and designate and sign West Ferndale cutoff as the official entrance/exit to and from West Ferndale Road. This option eliminates the safety hazard, allows for safe entrance/exit to and from West Ferndale Road and safe entrance to Woodhill Country Club Road and eliminates maintenance of one intersection. TO: Mayor and City Council �l\_\_ FROM: Mark Derr,hardzon, City Administrato�� v Forwarded recommending approval of option 2 as recommended by staff but that it be so done following a Public: hearing tentatively scheduled for June 23, 1986. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by _ - to accept staff recoimnendat.ion and establish a public. hearing for June 2.3, 1986. Ayes - Nays RUSGELL Aur. I ! 08RE LINE ST 'AI Da L L Zn4 D rR !VATE DRI VC DRiV F V 52786.1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Orono City Council will hold a public hearing on June 23, 1986, at 7:00 P.M. C.D.T. at the Orono City Council Chambers, 1275 Brown Road South, to consider closing one of the intersections of West Ferndale Road at Shoreline Drive (County Road 15). Public comments both oral and written will be heard at the above time and place. /S/ Dorothy M. Hallin City Clerk Please publish in the Laker and Pioneer newspapers the week of June 9, 1.86. JU►N 2 3 19�'6 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIi MEETING HELD Jiffy, 1986 �J d ATTENDANCE 7:04 P.M. 091" The Orono Council met on the above date with the following members present: Acting Mayor Adams, Councilmembers Grabek, Frahm, and Hammerel. Mayor Butler was absent due to illness. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder Peterson. City Attorney Blatz was also present. CONSENT AGENDA* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to approve the Consent Agenda* as submitted. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Counci lmember Hammerel, to approve the minutes of the May 27, 1986 Council Meeting as submitted. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to approve the minutes of the 1986 Board of Review Meeting held on May 27, 1986 as submitted. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS There were no comments from the Park Commission at this time. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Planning Commission member J. Diann Goetten was present and had no comments at this time. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments from the public at this time. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: #990 WARD FERRELL 3405 WATERTOWN ROAD VARIANCE DENIAL RESOLUTION City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed the three options in this application: 1. Adopt denial Resolution as drafted. 2. Table the matter indefinitely upon request by applciant. 3. Allow the applicant to revise his application to a 1-additional-building-site request. 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETJNG HELD JUNE 9, 1986 #990 WARD FERRELL continued Ward Ferrell and his attorney, Jerry Rice, were present for this matter. Mr. Rice stated that he is familiar with the area in question because he lives in the area and also holds a contract for deed on property across the road from applciant's. He stated that he has researched the matter and feels there is a substantial issue of equitable estoppel involved and that this is a special situation based on an old promise by a Mayor. He stated that Mr. Ferrell is prepared to proceed with a legal suit if necessary. Councilmember Frahm asked applicant if he wanted the Council to act on the request for three lots, not considering any alternatives. Mr. Ferrell stated that was correct. Mr. Rice stated that they would be agreeable to Council tabling the request in order for Council to think about it. City Attorney Blatz wanted the record clarified regarding the apparent conversation between Mr. Ferrell and Planning Commission member VanNest, she noted that the record was researched and found no indication that word was given to Mr. Ferrell that he could plat his property accordingly and the code would not apply to hi.m. She also noted that there is case law whereas the court ruled that l:.:gardless of indications made by a past council, the current council must uphold the ordinances. Mr. Rice clarified that he was referring to the word given by Mayor Ross when Mr. Ferrell platted his property. Acting Mayor Adams stated that he was always told that one council can not bind future councils. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, to approve the denial resolution as drafted to be adopted June 9, 1986. At this point, Mr. Ferrell and his attorney were given the opp3rtunity to request tabling this matter to reconsider the request for Z additional houses. Mr. Rice stated that he would like the matter tabled in order for him to consult with his client, Mr. Ferrell. City Attorney Blatz stated that she would recommend tabling the matter if the Counci l's intent is to allow applicant to modify his application for 1 additional house to be construct(-d on his property. 2 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 9, 1986 #990 WARD FERRELL continued Councilmember Frahm withdrew his mo*ion. It was moved by Councilmember Hammerel, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to table this matter at this time. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. #991 & #10'C WILLIAM J. [LRICH 1535 b 1595 BOHN'S POINT ;OAD AFTER -THE -FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS RESOLUTION #2004 City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed the conditional use permits and variances and the drafted resolution addressing the following items: berms are limited to 3- 1/2' with no fences on them, staff has devised standards for the drainfield and the plan will be approved in accordance with those standards, alteration of the lagoon, fill between the the two properties, and letter of credit and developers agreement has been secured. Staff recommends adoption of the resolution. He noted hat Pl<<nning Commission will review the requests for geothermal system and extension of seawall in lagoon at their June 16th meeting. Present representinq applicant were: Attorney Gregory Halbert, Surveyci Mark Gronberg, and Engineer Don Brauer. Mr. Halbert stated that they have reviewed the proposed resolutioi and request amendment of Condition #3 being that the former residence on Lot 2 must be removed by July ;, 1986. He stated that they are currently using the house for storing materials, housing and sanitation facilities for the laborers, therefore requesting that trey allow the house to remain until September _, 1986 subject tc keeping the property neat and orderly. Staff stated that they had no problem with that request. City Administrator Bernhardson noted that they have not received any more complaints regarding the construction hours. It was moved by Acting Mayor Adams, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to adopt Resolution #2004 approving the after -the -fact conditional use permits and variance amending the date on '-)ndition #3 to September ], 1986. Motion, Ayes 4, NayE 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL, MEETING HELD JUNE 9, 1986 #1011 EXCELSIOR BAY YACHT CLUB DEERING ISLAND CONDITIONAI, USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE City Administrator Bernhardson reported that staff received word that the owner of Deering Island is withdrawing the application and will be sending a letter to that effect. He recommended tabling the application until it is formally withdrawn. It was moved by Councilmember Hammerel, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, to table the Excelsior Bay Yacht Club application at this time. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. #1015 ERVIN KAMM* 755/763 NORTH FERNDALE ROAD FINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #2005 It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to adopt Resolution #2005 approving the Plat of Lydiard Hills. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. #1017 MORRIS & JACKIE NELSON 1900 SHORELINE DRIVE ZONING AMENDMENT City Administrator Bernhardson explained ti:e proposed Zoning Amendment to create a Bed & Brea'( asc (B&B) conditional use permit within a residential. district issues being 1)concept of B&B in the community 2) and the specifics of B&B. He noted that Morris Q Jzckie Nelson are listed as the zoning amendment appl:ca!)ts, however, it is a zoning amendment general and generic to the community and not specifically to their property and application. Depending on the outcome of this Council meeting, they may be taking their conditional use permit application before the Planning Commission. At this time, Councilmember Frahm removed himself from the Council because he has been involved with business talks with Morris NAson. son. He noted that he has voiced his feelings regarding B&B use in previous discussions. Councilmember Grabek stated that he felt a B&B was not an appropriate use in a residential community and does not benefit the community. He was concerned with how the city would control and limit B&B's. He noted that if tnis use were approved, he felt +t the proprietors should be experienced in this area and their financial background should be reviewed. He noted that this was his own personal unsolicited opinion. MiNU"'ES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 9, 1986 #10.17 MORRIS & JACKIE NELSON continued Acting Mayor Adams stated that he felt the required conditional use permit would control the Br-B. He noted that he felt reluctant to vote on a zon.,ng amendment with only three members of the Council. City Attorney Blatz stated that any ordinance must be enacted by a majority vote of the entire Council, which would be three ,,;mbers i.e. three positive votes in order to pass. Councilmember Hammerel stated that he felt Orono is the type of place for a B&B and adds charm to the neighborhood. Acting Mayor Adams seated that there should be alternative uses for large homes in residential areas. He stated that he would like Mayor Butler's input and would like to do more research himself. Pauline Bouchard, 1860 Shoreline Dr., presented 89 signatures of Orono residents stating their opposition to the proposed B&B establishments in resid?ntial areas. She stated that she personally objected to having a B&B next door and stated that in her opinion it would have to run seven days a week (rather than the proposed weekends only) in order to supfcrt the business which would make it just like a motel. Acting Mayor Adams asked if they would support a B&B use if certain conditions were imposed. Pauline Bouchard stated "No, itwas too open-ended". It was moved by Acting Mayor Adams, seconded by CouncilmemLer Hammerel, to table this matter at this time. (Staff to set apprcpriate date) Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. #1020 SUBURBAN HENNEPIN REG1C•NAL PARK DISTRIC`C 2865 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - NOERENBERG KFI40RIAL PARK CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Representing Suburban hennepin Regional Park r=strict were: Marti, Jessen, Commissioners Neil Weber & irley Boni.ne, Director of Natural Resources David Weaker, Bob Wicklund and Deli Bart.cl:�, ar d Don King. City Administrator Bernhardson stated that Noerenberg Park is a permitted use in the residential area but because of the Lr,1^>>eness of the park the city has already required a cony i t ions l use permit. The Park District is to make their presentation regarding the maser pl,n development of the park. 5 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 9, 1986 #1020 SUB. HENN. REG. PARR DISTRICT continued Acting Mayor Adams sta , d that he would like to puuiicly thank and recognize i four Orono residents who served on the Noerenberg ' rk Advisory Committee for their efforts and time pug. into this plan. They are: J. Diann Goetten, Barb Peterson, JoEllen Hurr, and George Rector. Marty Jessen and Deb Bartels made their presentation of the proposed plan. Mr. Jessen noted that the only area in which there is a discrepancy from the criteria set forth in the Orono City code is related to the hardcover within the 0-75' area. They are proposing an additional slight increase of 0.3% of hardcover which would be for widening the existing brick path. He st- ed that according to the current attendance figures (w►,ich they consider the park is very under utilized at this time), they predict the annual attendance in 1990 would be approximately 19,000, this increase is partially based on the proposed extended season. He noted that it wa, not their intent to attract large crowds but they would like to provide high quality services and facilities. Mr. Jessen state,' that the plan consists of three phases of development: 1) Memorial arbor, landscare plantings, site utilities, water distribution, and parking lot. 2) Visitor center, pathways, garden trellis and plantings. 3) water feature, wall garden at entrance, fountain sculpture and other architectural features. He stated that funding for the improvements beyond phase 1 are currently not available and depend on funding of contributic-s etc. They would like apprc- -i1 on the entire plan at this time. Public Comments Mr. & Mrs. -eorge Grooms, 3065 North shore Drive - They understood that this plan was turned down by the Planning Commission and wondered why it was still under consideration. Mr. Grooms stated that he believed Lora Hoppe would not have approved of the plan and it was not her intent, her intent was to have a few ladies visiting on occasion and a plan of this size is not necessary for that intent. Pat & Jim Mitchell, 2685 North Shore Drive - She stated that there was no need for a building when the park is used only 3 months of the year, and no need for the blacktop parking lot.. Jim Mitchell noted that the will states that the park "clot present problems for neig) s". In addition, he noted that `he Planning Commis ion denied the plan due to the proposed intensification of use. R MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 9, 1986 #1020 SUB. HENN. REG. PINRK DISTRICT continued Diann Goetten - She stated that. the building is mainly for the maintenance personnel and storage of smaller equipment and also for restroom facilities. She also noted that Ray Forde, who has a lifetime estate, is in total support of the plan. She noted that the paved parking lot .is necessary due to the maintenance invoked in repairing the ruts created during rainy weather. Mary Ann Kienzler, 1200 Old Crystal Bay Rd. - She stated that she was in support of the plan and thought that it was a wonderful place for children to learn. Jack & Kathy Swensc.n, 3020 North Shrr^ Drive - Jack Swenson stated that he agreed wit the Planning Commission's findings regarding the intensification of use and chat the park is beautiful as is and saw no need to spend 1.2 million to change. Kathy Swenson stated that currently there is a big problem with boats docking and there is no atteript to control. Marty Jessen agreed that there was :i problem with L ats and that th-y intent to utilize the park rangers more to cont.-ol. JoEllen Hurr, LMCD representative on the Noerenberg Pazk Committee - She stated that she felt the plan presented was a good one and is within the intent of the Hoppe gill. She stated that the Hennepin Park District is a good neighbor and that this is nat a zoning issue except for the 0.3% hardcover issue. Tim Traff, 2683 North Shore Drive He stated that he resented the presentation given, is opposed to the plan and it should be left as is. The question was brought up regarding use of tax money for the park. Bob Wicklund stated that tax money has not officially been eliminated, but based on the Hoppe endowment for the park, there is no need or intent to use tax money for this project. Patricia Roberts, 2683 North Shore Drive - She stated that she objected to the proposed usage and the 25,000 annual visitor (mid 19901s) prediction. A resident questioned why the Park District was advertising a garden party in which -nusic and refreshments would be provided when the plaT has not been given approval yet and when they are not allowed to serve food -it the park. 7 MINUTES ON THE REGULAr ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 9, 1986 #102C SUB. HENN. REG. PARK DISTRICT continued Mr. Jessen stated that it was merely the annual garden party, the food consisted of tea and cookies, zhe music is usually a harpist etc. The purpose of the garden party was to basically recreate the atmosphere of a tea party that was held when the Noerenbergs lived there. Public comments closed. Councilmember Hammerel stated that he has lived in this area for 34 years a; ,d felt that the park was underused and that the residents just do not want a park for the publics' use. He noted that the current attendance is 9,000 visitors annually and nobody even notices them. He agreed that there was a problem with boaters but does not know what they can do about it other than having a full time officer standing guard. Councilmember Grabek stated that he objected to the additional parking on north side which could potentially lead to future expansion of the north side. He stated that he fe"t the park was currently underused however, th.:re should be limitations on the use such as no overflow parking. He noted that the park district does a good job of maintaining their parks. Acting Mayor Adams stated that he was opposed to the 50 blacktop parking spaces and felt they should start with half that amount of spaces and review the need at a later date, such as when the visitor center is built. Mr. Jessen stated that they felt the need for 50 spaces was already there but they could consider other alternatives to the blacktop such as grass Crete etc. Councilmember Frahm stated that the proposed overflow parking on the north side would require grading and is not needed. He also noted that there was an obvious need for equipment storage. In addition, he does not feel that anything should be sold i.e brochures, books, information etc. fie also stated that it w?s Lora Hoppe's intent to protect the neighbors but it was also her intent to have the general public come and see the gardens. Councilmember Grabek stated that he agreed with elimina'ing sales of any kind. Referring to the garden party, he stated that the Park District has always acted responsibly on the few small functions given. 8 MINUTES OF' THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 9, 1986 #1020 SUB. HENN. REG. PARK DISTRICT continued City Administrator Bernhardson noted that the only thing required was the hardcover variance and that, apart from the regrading, the conditional use request is more voluntary on the Park District's part, and any subsequent changes or plans would actually be a voluntary review on their part. It was moved by Acting Mayor Adams, seconded by Counci_lmember Grabek, to approve the plan as presented with the following stipulations and limitations: 1. Limit parking on the north side to 10-12 gravel spaces (as shown) with no additional site grading for expanded parking. 2. Limitation of initial parking on the south side to 26 spaces and the Park District consider alternatives to blacktop for that parking. 3. No sales of goods or service_. 4. Proposed building to remain at same size and exterior as presented when built. 5. Prir ring needs be reviewed at the time the building is built, but not to exceed the total of 50 spaces as originally proposed. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. #1022 CHARLES A. SCHALL 605 PARK LANE VARIANCE RESOLUTION City Administrator Bernhardson reported that the objecting neighbors have engaged legal counsel in this matter. Their attorney, James McKinnon, McKinnon, Standke, and Greene, submitted a letter requesting that the Council table this matter a5 he had conflict. Acting Mayor Adams read the letter _o the record (copy attached). Charles and Marilyn Sclial.l were present and stated that they objected to tabling this matter because they started the proceedings in April and the Planning Commission already tailed it one time. Mr. Schall stated that he would be unable to attend the July Council meetings. City Administrator Bernhardson stated that this matter would be scheduled for the June 23rd Council meeting. Mr. Schall stated that lie would be able to attend that meeting but still objected to tabling the application. 9 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 9, 1986 #1022 SCHALL continued Councilmember Frahm stated that he felt they should table the matter in consideration of Attorney McKinnon's request to avoid the potentiality of a legal case. I•= was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to table this matter until the June 23rd Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. Staff was instructed to inform the neighbors that action will be taken on June 23rd with or without their representation. #1023 ROLLA & NANCY MARTIN 2675 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2006 Rolla & Nancy Martin were present for this matter. Mr. Martin reviewed the proposed plan to construct a bedre�.)m addition which would increase the hardcover in the 75- 250' area by 0.3%. He noted the the existing decking, which was included in the hardcover does not have plastic under it. It was moved by Councilmember Hammerel, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, to adopt Resolution #2006 approving the hardcover variance. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. #1027 MRS. PHILLIP PILLSBURY 1200 BRACRETTS POINT ROAD VARIANCE Present representing the applicant were Attorney Steve Pflaum, Architect William Scott, and Landscape Designer Damon Farber. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a 2-1/ 2' height variance for a 6' high section of brick wall that is adjacent to Bracketts Point Road and Cty. Rd. 15. Damon Farber stated that the reason for the 6' wall is mainly for aesthetic purposes as well as health and safety. He stated that the corner is busy, dangerous, and noisy. He noted that their preference is to be consi stant i.e. entire wall 3-1/2' or entire wall 6' in height. Steve Pfl.aum pointed out the areas in which the variance was needed noting that in some area they can construct the 6' wall without a variance. He noted that traffic can be heard in the house with windows closed as well be seen. In addition, vehicle headlights shine directly in the house at night. He stated tha- l0 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 9, 1986 #1027 PILLSBURY continued evergreen problems. object to plantings would help but would create other It was also noted that none of the neighbors the wall. Acting Mayer. Adams stated that he felt the proposed wall was very attractive however, the Council must consider all other wall requests that may follow this request if it were approved. He stated that he would like to find a solution within the ordinance and that a wall is not the only solution to the headlight problem. Planning Commission member Goetten stated that she voted in favor of the wall because because of the unique situation and headlight problem. It was moved by Acting Mayor Adams, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to approve the height variance along County Rd. 15 to the driveway, and deny the height variance along Bracketts Point Rd. Proponent indiciated they would like to reconsider their design in light of Council's comments. No further action taken. #1028 LEN BACHRES 2813 CASCO POINT ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2007 Leonard and Mary Ann Bachkes were present for this matter.. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the minor variance requests to construct an addition a) 1% (91 s.f. ) hardcover increase in the 75-250' area b) 0.5 feet side setback variance on the west side of house. It was noted that there was no hardcover available for trade-off. It was moved by Councilmember Hammerel, seconded by Acting Mayor Adams, to adopt Resolution #2007 as drafted approving the variances. Motion, Ayes 4, nays 0. #1029 LEO CLIFFOPD* 4760 NORTH SHORE DRIVE VARIANCE (RENEWAL) RESOLUTION #2008 It war moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to adopt Resolution #2008 approving renewal of lot area/lot width variances. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 11 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 9, 1986 #1030 CHARLES D. DOLLAR 1810 LAKEVIEW TERRACE VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2009 Charles Dollar was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a side yard setback variance to construct an addition 16.5' from the lot line. Acting Mayor Adams stated that this is an interesting specific situation in that there is really no other place for an addition and he had no problem with it. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Acting Mayor Adams, to adopt Resolution #2009 approving the variance as proposed. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. #1031 !MARK HUNSLEY 3464 EASTLAKE STREET VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2010 Mark Hunsley was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained ':he request for hardcover variances 0-75' - 1.2% and 75--250' - 2.9% to construct a patio. It was noted that this request is similar to the request approved on the two lots immediately adjacent. It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to adopt Resolution #2010 approving the variance requests. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. #1032 BRIAN FUIJM 3505 WAYZATA BLVD. VARIANCE RBSOLOTION Upon recommendation of staff, it was moved by Acting Mayor Adams, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to table this matter until the June 23rd Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 1. Councilmember Frahm •voted nay. #1033 ROYAL J. DOSSETT 2795 PHEASANT ROAD VARIANCE RESSOLUTION Mr. Dossett was present for this matter. 12 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 9, 1986 #1033 DOSSETT continued City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for hardcover variances a) 0-75' - 3.4% (total 4.4%) b)75- 250' - 0.3% (total 26.7%) for construction of a screen porch and patio. Mr. Dossett stated that the screen porch was necessary because the mosquitos and bees make the area unusable otherwise. He indicated the need for a sidewalk around the house because grass is unable to grow because of the shade. He noted that the house can not be seen from the lake and that there would be no run-off to the lake. Acting Mayor Adams stated that he was cciicerned with the hardcover in the 0-75' and felt the Council should view this property. Councilmember Frahm stated that he found no hardship involved. It was moved by Acting Mayor Adams, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to table this matter to find additional ways to eliminate the hardcover. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 1986 JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE; MINNETONKA POWER SQUADRON RESOLUTION #2011 It was moved by Counci.lmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Iammerel, to adopt Resolution # 2011 approving a Joint Use Dock License to Minnetonka Power Squadron for the period of January 1, 1986 to December 31, 1986 and to waive the late fee, finding that the lateness of the application was an administrative oversight and not. intentional. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. MAYOR'S REPORT: ADMINISTRATOR'S GOAL SETTING & COMPENSATION REVIEW Due to Mayor Butler's absence, no action was taken on this matter. CABLE TV REPORT: MAY - ORONO SCRIPT* It was moved ty Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to accept information presented regarding cable T.V. production "Lake Minnetonka News". Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: 13 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 9, 1986 LES KELLEY PRIVATE ROAD VARIANCE APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE DEC_,ION Mr. Lester Kelley was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained Mr. Kelley's request to construct an 18' paved surface road in the Kelley Green Subdivision instead of the 24' wide road as required. Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson stated that an 18' wide road would allow no parking on the road. He recommended at least a 24' wide base. Councii,,,ember Frahm stated that his only concern was allowinc, enough room for emergency vehicles. It was noted that there was really no need for parking on the road because of the lot sizes. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, to allow a 20' wide paved surface with a 24' wide base. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. WAYZATA INSPECTIONS CONTRACT It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to accept staff's information regarding the pending contract between Wayzata and Orono for building inspection services for approximately a year's duration. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammers 1, to accept staf f's information regarding animal control services and this item be tabled to June 23, 1986 at which "me Council will address the issue of animal control -ices and award a contract for the balance of the yea— Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. AKERBERG RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT* RESOLUTION #2012 It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to approve the right-of-way permit for the property at 4075 Highwood Road for adoption of Resolution #2012. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 1985 POLICE REPORT It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to accept the 1985 Orono Police Operations statistical report. Motion, Ayes 4, nasy 0. 14 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 9, 1986 POST OFFICE LEASE* VANEECRHOUT SEWER* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to ratify the lease with the U.S. Postal Service and authorize the City Administrator to sign such agreement. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to accept staff's information regarding the request for server services to the VanEeckhout property. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. BOARD OF REVEIW RECONVENING* JUNE 11, 1986 - 7:00 P.M. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to acknowledge the reconvening date of the Board of Review for June 11, 1986 at 7:00 P.M. Motion, Aves 4, Nays 0. REFUND OF SUBDIVISION FEE FOR MICHAEL ROBINSON* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to approve the refund of the subdivision application fee to Michael Robinson (Application #1024) per staff recommendation in the amount of $177.28. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. REPLACEMENT OF FLOORING-* ORONO GOLF COURSE It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, tc authorize the replacement of ba—room f loors at the nrono Golf Course by West Tonka Interiors in the amount f $610.68. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to accept staff's information regarding Bohn's Point. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: City Attorney Blatz had nothing to report at this time. LICENSES* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to approve the following licenses: Septic System Installers - Volkenant 6 Sons, Inc. Duane Ritter Exc. Coppin Plumbing Quickway Exc. Co. 15 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 9, 1986 LICENSES* continued BILLS* Special Event - Smuckler Corp., Parade of homes at 2780 L'Etoile du Nord on September 9, 1986 3-8 p.m. weekdays/1-6 p.m. weekends Liquor License - Jimmies Lounge Set-up License - Spring Hill Center Off -Sale - James P. Hill, Little Oak Market\ On -Sale - Grant R. Wenkstern, Lakeview Golf Course Robert D. Bennett, Mexican Eatery Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to approve payment of the All Funds Accounts and Liquor Store Accounts. Motion, Aye 4, Nays 0. ADJOURNMENT 10:20 P.M. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Acting Mayor Adams, to adjourn the regular Council meeting at 10:20 P.M. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor 16 MACKINNON, STA-v.-eJOKE &► GREENE, LTA. 1 AW C7FFICF_ S 1 771 7 HIGHWAY 7 MINNETONKA. MINNESOTA 55345 OUNUL MEETING ,�AMF. Ei O MACK WNON ROCERT A STANUKE MARK E CRECNE I I',( OANIELS GREENSTEIN June 91986 UJ 7 9 S UEa+2 ERIC C OAMMEYER , IC, rpHo. 4.32? I CITY OF ORONO Mayor and Ciuncil Members City of Orono Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Application #1022 Charles A. Schall This letter is to requez t that you table your action on the above matter until your next meeting. Betty Rudd contacted me on Friday, June 6, 1986 to ask me to investigate the situation and advise her regarding her legal rights. She did so believing that fi.:al action would be on June 16, 1986. I would appreciate this short extension of time so that I can do the work necessary to adequately represent the interests of my client. Very truly yours, MACKINNO , STANDKE b REENE, LTD. ru- � 1-S Jam D. MacKinnon JDM/VB RECONVENED JUN 2 3 19a6 1986 BOARD OF REVIEW CITY OF nkriW JUNE 11, 1986 le cE The reconvened 1986 Board of Review meeting was called to order by Mayor Butler at 7:00 p.m., June 11, 1986. Councilmembers present wer, Hammerel, Adams and Frahm. Councilmember Grabek absent. h.,so present from the City staff were City Administrator Bernhardson, City Clerk Hallin, Rolf Erickson, City Assessor; Dave Wild and Rita Guderian Assistant City Assessors. Assessor Erickson stated that the issue regarding the golf courses was an issue of the definition of "recreational value" and the Board would have to make their own determination based on the information that has been presented to them. City Administrator Bernhardson stated that the County had tried to do two things. #1.) Was to determine the recreational value, which is essentially bast-d on what the agricultural v,1.ue is, plus the construction co:.t of a golf course, and #2.) Was to establish a uniform system of treating all the golf courses on a similar basis across the County. Councilmember Adams stated that on the advise of the City Attorney he was going to absent himself from discussion and vote of the Lakeview Golf Course issue because he felt this issue would expand to include the Woodhill Country Club property and he is a member of the Board of Trustees at Woodhill. Assessor Erickson gave the City Clerk a :tter from Woodhill .ountry Club, requesting an adjustment in their value 1986 market value. Grant Wenkstern - P.I.D. 06-117-23 32 0002, 06-117-23 33 0005, 06-117-23 33 0007, 06-117-23 34 0002 and 07-117-23 12 0001, o the Lakeview Golf Course stated he wanted Bob Martin to make a statement to the Board in his behalf. Mr. Martin stated he is a member of the Burl Golf Club in Minnetrista and he was with the County Assessor's office for 22 years before h s retirement and was active in that position when the recreational value law was passed. He stated that the real issue is the method by which the recreational value is being created under the present e-•ystem. He stated to the Board that the recreational value of the golf courses and the open space is a benefit to the City. If the value is raised too high that form of recreation will disappear. Mayor Butler stated that the she could not see the logic of the new formula. She stated that the Board's function was to determine what is fair and what is right. Therefore to maintain the intent of the recreational value and in order to retain I:e recreat * na 1 aspect of that open space it is incumbent for the 1 Board to direct the Assessor for the City to redur the proposed 1986 recreational value on the golf course bac., to the 1983 recreational value. Councilmember Frahm stated the Board should not get involved with the valuation of golf courses and felt the original intent of the formula was right. He stated that he would be willing to go back to the 1985 value for one year, a• his was the first year that the new formula for recreationa -ue had been used. He also stated the golf courses should wc, aith the Assessors and Hennepin County to adjust the formula and make it equal. Councilmember Hammerel stated that the formula needs equity. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Mayor Butler that the 1986 recreational va ues for the three golf courses in the City of Orono, Lakeview ,-lf Course, Woodhill Country Club and Wayzata Country Club, be kept at their 1985 recreational values for this year only. Lakeview Golf Course 1985 and 1986 taxable value P.I.D. Land Bldg. Total 06-117-23 32 0002 310,000 310,100 06-117-23 33 0005 4,400 4,400 06-117-23 13 0007 4,400 4,400 07-117-23 12 0001 2,700 2,700 Woodhill Country Club 1985 and 1986 taxable value P.I.D. Land Bldg. Total 02-117-23 12 0001 423,200 122,600 545,800 Wayzata Country Club 1985 and 1986 taxable value P.I.D. Land Bldg. Total 36-118-23 13 0002 35,500 35,500 36-118-23 13 0003 6,000 6,000 36-118-23 14 0010 66,200 66,200 36-118-23 34 0001 148,400 148,400 36-118-23 34 0002 4,700 4,700 36-118-23 42 0003 1.70,100 170,100 36-118-23 43 0001 181,200 1,470,000 1,651,200 36-118-23 44 0001 117,000 117,000 The Board acknowledges that Hennepin County is trying to equalize the golf courses with a formula, however the City of Orono feels the formula is not correct at this time. Motion 3 Ayes 0 Nays. Councilmember Adams abstained. James Rivers - P.I.D. 11-117-23 22 0004, 11-117-23 22 0005, 11-117-2_3 22 0_00_6_, 11-1_17-23 22 0007 and 11-117-23 22 0010. Assessor F,r ickson stated that he did not have time to complete the review of this property. He had met with Mr. Rivers at 8:00 a.m. today. Erickson stated he had used the same type of E approach on all the marinas. His recommended that the Board leave the values as they are for 1986. Mr. Rivers stated he had given the assessor his profit and loss statement and this shows that the marina has not made any money last year or the year before. Since the sewer was put in the taxes have skyrocketed. Councilmember Adams noted that this marina was valued the lowest in the City. Mr. Rivers stated that his property is both commercial and residential and he would not be able to rebuild a commercial use because he operates under a conditional use permit. Assessor Erickson stated he valued the property as it is being used at the present time. It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm to accept the Assessor's 1956 market value on P.I.D. 11-117-23 22 0004, 11-117-23 22 0005, 11-117-23 22 0006, 11-117-23 22 0007 and 11-117-23 22 0010 and reminded Mr. Rivers that he has other avenues of appeal. Motion 4 Ayes, Nays 0. Sarah Wyatt, P.I.D. 31-118-23 12 0013- David Wilde stated to the Board that this house has been carried as incomplete for a num"nr of years and .is currently classified as 85% complete. Aftex an inspection of the property he recommended the the aalue be reduced from $122,600 to $120,000. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams to accept the Assessor's recommended 1986 market value of $120,000 on P.I. D. 31-118-23 12 0013. Motion 4 Ayes, 0 Nays. The Board also acted on the following items: John Hollander, P.I.D. 25-118-23 43 0009, 25-118-23 43 0011, 25-118-23 43 0019 and 25-118-23 44 0005. The Assessor stated he had not been able to contact Mr. Hollander. He stated that after review of the property he had changed the value on two of the i -ircels P.I.D. 25-118-23 43 0009 changed to $30,000 1986 market value and P.I.D. 25-118-23 43 0011 changed to $30,000 1986 market value. P.I.D. 25-118-23 43 0019 and P.T.D. 25-118-23 44 0005 had no changes. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel to accept the Assessor's 1986 market value on P.I.D. 25-1.18-23 43 0009 of $30,000 and P.I.D. 25-118-23 43 0011 of $30,000 and no change on P.I.D. 25-118-23 43 0019 and 25- 118-23 44 0005. Motion 4 Ayes, 0 Nays. Jane Slaughter, P.I.D_ D. 30-118-23 31 0002. The Assessor stated here is a pending division on this property and once the paperwork on the division has been completed the new value will 3 be reflected and therefore recommended no change in value. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel to accept the Assessor's 1986 market value on P.I.D. 30-118-23 31 0002. Motion 4 Ayes, 0 Nays. Alan McDowell, P.I.D. 02-117-23 44 0010. The Assessor stated he recommends to the Board that this value remain the same. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm to accept the Assessor's 1986 market value on P.I.D. 02- 117-23 44 0010. Motion 4 Ayes, 0 Nays. Timothy Schoen, P.I.D. 33-118-23 44 00 1. The Assessor stated after a review of the property he would commend a change in the 1986 market value from $111,700 to $100,100. It was Moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel to accept the Assessor's recommended change in the 1986 market value from $111,700 to $100,100 on P.I.D. 33-118-23 44 0031. Motion 4 Ayes, 0 Nays. Karen Ziminsky, P.I.D. 27-118-23 31 0006. The Assessor stated he had revalued the property and recommended the value be placed at the 1985 sale price of S275,000. It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm to accept the Assessor's 1986 market value recommendation of $275,000 from $291,100 on P.I.D. 27-118-23 41 0006. Motion 4 Ayes, 0 Nays. Patrick Wolfe, P.I.D. 20-117--23 31 0056. The Assessor tated that due to the adverse influence of the public lake access next to the property he would recommend to the Board that the 1986 market value be reduced from $374,100 to $351,200. I : moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Hammer(. accept the Assessor's recommended 1986 market value of $351,t00 reduced from $374,100 on P.I.D. 20-117-23 31 0056. Motion 4 Ayes, 0 Nays. Marion Gra , P.I.D. 03_117-23 31 0026. The Assessor stated that after a review of +the property he recommends changing the 1986 market value from $187,400 to $177,200. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Mayor Butler to accept the Assessor's recommended 1986 market value of $177,200 from $187,400 on P.I.D. 03-117-23 34 0026. Motion 4 Ayes, 0 Nays. Scott Goldsmith, P_.I.D. 33-1.18-23 31 0011. The Assessor statedherec:)mme,u:�d a reduction in the 1986 market value from $56,700 to $46 (300 to reflect the amo;lnt of construction, footings only, , s of January 2, 1986. 4 It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Frahm to accept the Assessor's recommended 1986 market value of $46,000 reduced from $56,700 on P.I.D. 33-118-23 21 0011. Motion 4 Ayes, 0 Nays. Al Hi lde, P.I.U. 36-118-23 41 0051. The Assessor stated that the property was purchased in 1985 for more than the current 1986 market value, therefore he recommened no change. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel to accept the 1986 market value of $284,800 as presented by the Assessor on P.I.D. 36-118-23 41 0051. Motion 4 Ayes, 0 Nays. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams to adjourn the 1986 Reconvened Board of Review at 8:45 p.m. Motion 4 Ayes, 0 Nays. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor 5 WOODHILL COUNTRY CLUB :uu %X001)t111.1. ROAD 1i3.7iij Board of Review City of Orono Orono, Minnesota Ladies and Gentlemen: June 11, 1986 Please accept this letter as a protest relating to the new assessment of the Woodhill Country Club premises. Woodl,ill is situated principally in Orono, but the building and probably some of the other parts of the land are located in Wayzata. We have been informed that the aggregate open space value assessed against Woodhill for 1986 is $4,240,62110 compared to the 1985 value of �81 9Hti:—Assuming these figures to be correct, this constitutes a increase. The statistics provided show that the County Asssessor has valued Woudhill higher than any other golf course in Hennepin County, using a grid or a matrix that involves great subjectivity on the part of the assessor. The law provides that the assessor must not consider the value the golf course real estate would have if it were converted to commercial, industrial, residential or seasonal residential use. In other words, it cannot be tax " at its "highest and best" use, but rather ►rust be valued for its present recreoi nal use. It does not seem credible that the land of the Woodhill golf course should be valued higher than Interlachen County C IW-, Wayzata Country Club, Minneapolis Country Club or Oakridge Country Club, by example. The latter Clubs are in a much more urban setting and as open space should be more valuable, if the spirit of the subject statute were to be recognized. We urge that the assessment of Woodhill for open space purposes be continued as in the past and that an adjustment be im-le accordingly. Sincerely, Ilenry S. li4ran, 'lJ President (�� 40U-SM4 O'0FTINC JON 2 3 1986 TO: Mayor Butler IT OF FIRO" Mark Dernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE: June 18, 1986 SOBJ: #918 John D. Nordstrom, 541 Spring Hill Road Final Subdivision - Resolution The applicant has fulfilled all conditions of preliminary plat approval. Staff recommends approval of the final plat, North Stream, subject to the findings and conditions set forth in the enclosed staff memo. The applicant has selected the name of North Stream Road for the private road. Staff has found no conflict with existing road name and recommends approval. Applicant must be advised that a fee of $150.0 is required for installation of street sign and stop sign. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF NORTH STREAM APPLICATION NO. 918 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the 1,.is of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted sub- division regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for subdivision by John D. Nordstrom, the ;.adivider; and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the RR-lB zoning district finding that each lot is of a size and configura- tion that will allow its use as a single family residence to be fully developed without the need of any variances; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all i -quirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1. Dedication of Drainage and Utility Easements on the plat. 2. Dedication on the plat of right of way for a public road shown as Spring Hill Road. 3. Creation of a new private road shown on the plat as Outlot B to be known henceforth as North Stream Road. 4. Cuncurrent with the creation of this private road, the Subdivider has dedicated to the City a Road and Utilities Easement granting to the City permanent access, improvement and utility easements over said Outlot; the Subdivider has created non-exclusive ingress, egress, drainage and utility easements over said Outlot in favor of all abutting and/or benefiting lots including a declaration of certain maintenance covenants wherein each of the abutting and/or benefiting lot owners covenants and agrees to permanently maintain and pay the cost of maintenance for said private road. 5. Dedication to the City of a Flowage and Conservation Easement providing for limitations on the use of wetlands and/or drainageways described therein and shown on the plat as "drainage easements". Page 1 of 3 6. Execution of a Developer's Agreement providing for installation of certain improvements as a condition of subdivision approval. The improvements required by the City are as follows: a) North Stream Road to be constructed per standards for private road serving 5 lots: -Gravel base tc sonsist of 8" of Class 5, 1007 crushed rock -Paved 24" surface of 3" 2341 Bituminous surface b) Private driveway serving Lots 1,2 & 3 to be constructed per engineering plans by Mark S. Gronberg dated June 18, 1986. 7. Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fee in the amount of $800.00. 8. Payment to the the City for the legal review and filing of the plat, easements and covenants in the amount of $150.00. NOW, THEREFORE, TIE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of North Stream, Hennepin County, Minnesota; subject to the following conditions: 1. The City shall not issue building permits for Lots 1 and 2 until the driveway serving the existing residence has been removed and the area completely restored per City's approval. 2. The City shall not issue building permits for new construction on Lots 1 , 2, 4 & 5 until the gravel base work for North Stream Road has been approved by the City. 3. Applicant is hereby advised that per the date of this subdivision approval, the City of Orono's cLrrent lakeshore setback of 75 feet is .effective. The Department of Natural Resources has placed the City on notice that more restrictive setback standards must be adopted by the City at some future date. The setbacks are as follows: -All structures require 200 feet setback from Lydiard Lake -All septic systems require 150 feet setback from Lydiard Lake 4. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office on or before December 23, 1986 together with a certified original copy of this Resolution and executed copies of documents noted above. Page 2 of 3 The apprcval granted by this Resolution shall expire it the pl-t has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 23rd day of June, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Page 3 of 3 • 6 v ws • • 1 v • M t tov t .J/ R0� �• �' ' SP(;�� fur:..►w►'. � -ZAP a t• �� % �� •.lH Jam `- i ANA- y {tea ��` ✓ r a ,iQ S •. .. �.� t. Ct: �a. 'L t._ �_.:. y' _ 1t1.10 ire w_ rr 1 2 //•�i` OA%. / • o m NA SCALE IN FEET -DENOTES IRON MONUMENT BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED 4 1 iv i,,�,�� „ •12+ �o i atom Co KO1 Of 14aa" tr•t• �;'�%•' • t S r �'.: �� �I.�, +. `Ia tl v ./, sc,. ff�r'L�;sn •�t; '., , V• ax • «r Nn �ria«i� 1 L Go ••asa o*I •f.l it saw�•.�.Is tIN.• f►•a. So -fee atw'T., S•.�h •Nt or COFFIN Q GRONSERG, IN( .. ,. awa.•,.. .•-•:', :fit a ENGINEERS. LAND SURVEY' a • L ...'1 w NN Put TANG LAKE. MINNESOTA r JUIl 2 v To: Orono Council Members ,,. 9 OF �' k ig From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator Date: May 23, 1_.,6 Subject: #999 Bennett Belden/Evan Meline - 3598 North Shore Dr. - Variance - Denial Resolution Attached is a resolution for denial of the variances requested per Council direction of May 12, 1986. Staff has reviewed the Zoning Code to determine pose e uses for this property. Potential uses include: - sale to adjacent property owner for use as yard area - picnicking - garden - boat launch without a doc:. (private) ;'07E that 1) a dock cannot be placed on the property because docks area a :ssory structures; and 2) no accessory structures ar•.--lowed on the property. UPDATE MRMO JUNK 18, 1986: Thc: -kpplicants, Meline and Belden, and the former propert; owne--, .'�e LaBresh°s, were notified by mail of your tabling actio- at the May 27th meeting in order to allow them to be present when you take final action. A phone message was also le_} on the Meline/Belden -'lone answering device, but no response from any of the parties a::. of this writing. Staff would recommend adoption of the attached resolution of denial even if the parties do not appear at the meeting. ZONING FIL ii10.999 CITY OF ORONO NO` -.:E OF COUNCIL ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 5/28/86 TO: Bennett Belden/ Evan Meline COPIES: 3509 Pilgrim Lane Leslie & Blanche LaBresh Plymouth, MN 55441 4575 Wayzata Blvd. Maple lain, MN 55359 ------------------..---------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Variance DATE OF MEETING: 5/27/86 VOTE: 5 For 0 Against COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION: Table to June 23rd Co�incil meeting to give applicants the opportunity to appear at the meeting. If the applicant has troutle obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). If you desire certified copies of the off' tai Planning Commission minutes, they re available froin the k Kecorder or City Clerk after review acid appi val by the Plannii.; Commission. A RESOLUTION DENYING t --I TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CvOE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 AND SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 FILE NO. 999 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of M'.nnesota; and WHEREAS, pursuant to State Statutes 412 et. seq. and 462 et. seq. the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted zoning regulations for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; and W11FREAS, Bennett Belden and Evan Biel in.e (hereinafter "the applicants", have an interest in, and Leslie and Blanche LaBresh are the owners of property located within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") legally described as follows: That part of Lot 9, Block 2, Baldur Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Northwesterly of the Northwesterly right-of-way line of Countv Road 51 (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of a principal structure on a property that contains 5,300 square feet or 24% of the required 21,780 square feet in area, and 49 feet in width or 49% of the rec, sired 100-foot width, and setback of 10' from the County Road 51 right-of-way where a 30' set- back is normally required, and setback of 8' from the side ' )t line where a 10' setback is normally required, and setback of 63' From the lakesh­a where a 75' setback is normally required; and r_quirinq variances to Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 and 2 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 which sections prohibit structure, hardcover, and grading in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the application; the recommendations of staff and the Planning Commission; the comments and written statements submitted by the neighhors; the comments and written statements of the applicants and the property owner. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby denies the requested variances for the property described above based upon one or more of the following findings of fact concerning this property: page I of 6 FINDINGS 1. As of January 1, 1975, the property has been zoned LR-lC, Lakeshore Residential Zoning District, requiring a minimum of 1;4 acre in area and 100 .feet minimum width. Based on the performance standards of the zoning district, the proposed use of the property as a residential or buildable lot would require the following variances: a) Lot Area Required = 0.5 acres or 21,780 s.f. Existing = 5,300 s.f. or 24% Varian�-e = 16,480 s.f. or 76% a) Lot Width Required = 100 feet Existing = 49 feet Variance = 51' or 51% 2. Additional performance standards of the LR-lC Zoning Dis*---ct for which applicant' proposal would require variances are as follows: a) StLeet Setback Required = 30' Proposed = 10' Variance = 20' or 67% b) Left Side Setback Required = 10' Proposed = 8' Variance = 2' or 20% c) Lakeshore Setback Required = 75' Proposed = 63' Variance = 12' or 16% d) Hardcover 0-75' (Lot Aroa in 0-75' = 3,100 s.f.) Required (allowed) = 0 s.f. or 0% Proposed = 360 s.f. or 12% Variance = 360 s.f. or 12% e) Hardcover 75-250' (Lot Area in 75-250' Zone = 1,450 s.f.) Required (allowed) = 25% or 362.5 s.f. Proposed = 760 ° f. or 52.4% Variance = 397. s.f. or 27.4% f) Requires a variance to Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivision 2 and 1.0.55, Subdivision 8 which prohibit structures and prohibit grading or filling in the 0-75' setback zone. Page 2 of 6 3. The LaBreshes acquired the property in 1950. The property was sold on an unrecorded contract for deed to Meline and Belden in January, 1986. 4. A small cabin in severe disrepair existed on the property prior to November, 1985, at which time it was demolished by the owner per City Permit No. 5827 dated 11/4/85 to forestall Hazardous Building Action by the City of Orono per City Council Resolution No. 1857 dated September 9, 1985. The building foundation was not removed and re- mains on the site in a hazardous condition. 5. The property was assessed 1 sewer unit for the 1963-1 sewer project and the cabin was connected to municipal sewer in 1972. The total amount of the sewer assessment was $644.80. 6. The valuation of the property for tax purposes has been as follows: Year Land 1986 $34,100 1985 38,200 1984 38,200 1983 38,200 1982 34,800 1981 20,600 1980 13,900 (LV) 1979 9,300 (LV) 1978 7,300 (LV) 1977 6,050 (LV) 1976 1975 1974 LV - Limited Value Taxable Market Value Total Structure Est. Market $2,200 $36,300 2,200 40,400 2,200 40,400 2,200 40,400 2,000 36,800 1,400 22,000 700 (LV) 19,300 700 (LV) 16,000 700 (LV) 12,000 720 (LV) 7,500 - 6,160 - 5,600 - 5,600 The tax valuations suggest that the land has been recently valued as a lakeshore builc:iny site for tax purposes. However, the tax assessor's assignment of valuation to property is merely an opinik.-n based on the perceived existing or allowable uses of a parcel of property. The assigned valuation of this property might change substantially as a result of this clarification of allowed uses of this property. 7. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application at a Public Hearing on December 16, 1985 and tabled the application pending applicant's receipt of information regarding the possible purchase of an adjacent parcel of land. Paae 3 of 6 8. The Orono Planning Commission age' reviewed this application on February 18, 1986 and again tabled the application pending information on purchase of the adjacent lot. 9. The Orono Planning Commission again reviewed the application on April 21, 1986 and recommended denial of the requested variances, finding that: a) The variances requested are excessive considering the extremely smal'- dry buildable lot area. b) The property cannot be feasibly built upon without excessive variances being granted. c) The building which was removed was required to be removed because it was dilapidated and hazardous and was not removed merely to appease the Planning Commission, and because the bkA lding was vacant for a great many years, there are no "grandfather" rights to build on the property and that this is not "taking" of property. d) The high level of Lake Minnetonka in the Spring of 1986 gives a good indication that if the variances were granted, the proposed house would be potentially adversely affected by the lak? encroaching within 12 feet of the proposed foundation on an annual basis. 10. The City Council reviewed this application at their May 12, 1986 meeting and directed staff to draft a resolution of denial of the requested variances, and directed staff to research for the applicant what other potential uses the property may have. 11. The property can be put to a reasonable alloweJ use; it can be combined with the adjacent developed property for use as yard area, and it car, be used for picnicking, or for a garden.. 12. Applicants are not able to obtain adjacent vacant property, and the physical character of that property is such that the added vacant property would not alleviate the major problems with development of the subject property. 13. The proposed setback of 10' from the County Road 51 right-of-way, in conjunction with no ,..,)rage beinr provided on the property, would force applicants to park their private vehicles within public right- of-way, creating a potentia safety hazard. Page 4 of 6 14. The applicant purchasers of the property were aware of the zoning code requirements prior to their agreement to purchase the property and in fact applied for variances prior to the date of their purchase agreement, which they stated as beinq January 1986. Any hardship would seem to be self imposed. 15. The LR-lC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District contains 631 developed residential units. Of these 631 units: - 209 of 631 (or 33%) exceed the 0.50 acre lot area requirement - 517 of 631 (or 82%) are in excess of 0.20 acres - 611 of 631 (or 97%) are in excess of 0.15 acres The Counci 1 f inds that this lot of area 0.12 acres is not consistent with the existing developed lot sizes in the LR-lC Zoning District. 16. The property falls so far short of the zoning standards that the requested variances are too extensive to justify their granting. 17. Variances of the number and magnitude requested have not been previously granted for any property in the LR-lC Zoning District in contemporary times. The Council finds that- denial of the variances is consistent with previous Council action anc does not deny applicant equal treatment and protection under the law. 19. The property dces not conform to the current development pattern of the neighborhood. 11. The granting of the variances for the proposed development would set an adverse precedent in the City. 20. The intent of the application is contrary to the letter and intent of the Orono Comprehensive Plan. 21. The amount of light and air in the neighborhood would be diminished by adding a structure on this substandard lot. 22. The values of surrounding properties will be adversely affected. 23. The proposed variances would have an adverse effect upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community for the reasons outlined herein. Page 5 of 6 24. The granting of the required variances would result in the follo-ing violations of Section 10.03, Subdivision 3.A of the Zoning Code with which the applicant must first comply before the requested variances can be granted: a) In review of the factual findings noted above, the City finds that the essential character of the neighborhood will be altered if a building permit is issued for this property. b) In review of the factual findings noted above, the City finds that to establish a precedent that would allow severely sub- standard lots to be developed in complete conflict with the established environmental standards for lakeshore development within the City and to be detrimental to the public, health, safety and welfare. The City also looks to the broader, environmental principals and goals set forth in its Community Management Plan and the intent of the specific zoning district when dealing with matters related to the public health, safety and welfare. Issues involving the public health, safety and welfare are not only resolved in securing the obvious traffic and drainage concerns of surrounding property owners b,at the City also must provide its citizens with a designated and approved optimum level of density, open space and quality of life. 25. Approval of an application that requires a 76 per cent variance to lot area would establish a negative precedent in the future development of the LR-1C zoning district. The standards and intent of both the City's Zoning Code and Community Management Plan would no longer have any effect if the City establishes a precedent of approving variances of this degree. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held Mar--2-T; 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Miry C. Butler, Mayor Paqe 6 of C ZONING FILE NO 1010 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 5/29/86 ----------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Duane Hall COPIES: Al" 1860 Shadywood Road fING -----Wayzata. -MN55391 ----------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Variance XX Subdivision ------------------------------------------------------ DATE OF MEETING: 5/27/86 VOTE: 5 For 0 Against COUN:'1L ACTION - MOTION: To table act4on on your subdivision and variances application until either you or your authorized agent could appear before Council. Council has asked that I advise that in light of the denial of the application you may seek legal assistance and wish an attorney to appear on your behalf or to appear with you before the Council. Staff has enclosed a copy of the resolution delivered to your residence on May 23rd. Please advise staff if you wish additional copies of any memos or exhibits related to this review for your attorney or for your files. Your application has been rescheduled before the Council at their June 23, 1986 meeting. If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Recorder or Cit.y Clerk after review and ar,proval by the City Council. City of OR ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION DENYING DUANE N. HALL'S APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION AND VARIANCES FILE NO. 1010 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporat'on organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City Council") has adopted zoning and subdivision regulations pursuant to the power: ested in the City by State Statutf , 462.357 et. seq. and 462.358 et. seq. for purposes of ensuring the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the Cit1 Council has considered an application for a subdivision and variances made by Duane N. Hall (hereinafter "the applicant"), dated January 31, 1986 for property located at 1860 Shadywood Road and legs' y described as Lot 27 except the North 15 feet; said 15 feet being ,`asured at right angles from the North line of said lot and Lot 28, all in Shadywood (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the written reports by Lhe City staff; i.,ir unanimous Ltcu,it,nendati.on of the Plannina Commission; the comments and petitions submitted by surrounding neighbors; and the letters and comments made by the applicant. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereb; denies Duane N. Hall's requested subdivision of the property and fu- er denies any and all variances from zoning code performance standa which variances would have been required in order to approve sa-d subdivision, all based upon one or more of the following findings of fact concerning this property and this application: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The action of the City Council is based upon the layout for proposed subdivision attached hereto as Exhibit A, a survey by Mark S. Gronberg dated January 21, 1986, revised plan March 21, 1986 by the applicant. This is the plan conceptually acted upon by the City Council on April 28, 1986, and is the only plan ever placed before the City Council for their consideration. 2. The Hall proposal conforms to the definition of "subdivision" contained in Section 11.03 definitions 65 and 66 (G) of the Orono Subdivision Code, and was therefore reviewed according to the standards and procedures set forth in Chapter 11., the subdivision code: Page 1 of 9 City r%i ORONO RESOL A OF THE CITY COUNCIL [kill] 65. "Subdivision" - The separation of an area, parcel, or tract of ?and under single ownership into two or more parcels, tracts, lots, or long-term leasehold interests where the creation of the leasehold interest necessitates the creation of streets, roads, or alleys for residential, commercial, industrial, or other use or any combination thereof, except those separations: a. Where all the resulting parcels, tracts, lots, or i�.iterests will be 20 acres or larger in size and 500 feet in width for residential uses and five acres or larger in size for commercial and industrial uses; b. Creating cemetery lots; C. Resulting from court arder^. or the adjustment of a lot line by the relocation of common boundary as long as each of the two resulting lots meets the require- ments of the Zoning Chapter of the City Code. 6,j. "Subdivision, Classification". c. "Class III Subdivision" - A Class III Subdivision shall be a plat which includes, but is not limited to, a subdivision which meets one or more of the following nri i-pri n 1. The subdivision results in three or more buildable lots; or, 2. The subdivision involves a flexible zoning application; o_., 3. The subdivision involves the vacation or dedication of a public roadway; or 4. The subdivision involves the extension of municipal utilities. 3. The application of Duane N. Hall is for land subdivision and variances to zoning and subdivision performance standards. A flexible zoning application is defined as follows: Flexible Zoning - Flexible zoning includes but is not limited to, all special or conditional use permits, variances, planned unit development and rezoning. 4. The property is located in the LR-IC Zoning Dis ict, which district has the following minimum lot requirements: Page 2 of 9 City of OnONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) Lot Area = 1/2 acre or 21,780 s.f. Lot Width = 7.00 feet Street Setback = 30 feet Side Setback = 10 feet Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 Lakeshore Setback = 75 feet Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 Hardcover Regulations 0-75 Feet From Shoreline = No Hardcover 75-250' Feet From Shoreline = Maximum 25% Hardcover 5. The subdivision proposes a new division line of legally com'-fined lots and seeks the following variances to Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (E) and Section 10.22, Subdivisi-., ' of the Zoning Code: Lot A 1. Lot Area = 20,850 s.f. Area Variance = 930 s.f. or 4.2% Lot �. Lot Width = 70.5' Width Variance = 29.5 or 29.5% .ot Area = 18,450 s.f. ,rea Variance = 3,330 s.f. or 15.2% 2. Lot Width = 65.5' Variance = 34.5' or 34.5% Lot A Hardcover Within 75-250' Setback Area (15,560 s.f.) Allowed Hardcover = 3,890 s.f. or 25% Existing Hardcover = 5,1.74 s.f. or 33% Hardcover Variance = 1,284 s.f. or 8% 6. Lots A and B b proposed would also require variances t Section 11.31, Subdivision 2, Lot Dimensions, and Sshdivi-lion 3, Lot Area, Minimum, of the Subdivision Chapter because minimum standards of the LR-1C Zoning District can not be satisfied. 7. The applicant purchased the property on November 15, 1979 from James E. Stoddart and Adell G. Stoddart. B. The property (part of Lot 27 and Lot 28 ) was created in 1903 as part of the Shadywood Plat consisting of a total of 41 lots. 33 defined residential units exist today of the original 41 lots. 9. The original lot areas range from approximately 7,000 s.f. to 26,000 s.f. The lot widths range from 50 fee' 95+ feet.. Page 3 of ' City of ORONO i RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 13. , Of the 33 devel-ped lots the follow'ng patter, can be noted: a) Lot Widths 50'-59' 60'-79' 80'-99' 100'-150' ---------------------------------- 5 or 15% 16 or 48% 1 or 3% 11 or 33% 1. 11 of the 33 inits satisfy curr, lot width standards 2. 9 of the 11 units ranked at the 100'-150' widths are legally combined lots the same as the subject property. b) Lot Areas 7000-10,000 s.f. ---------------- 8 or 24% 18,001-22,000 s.f. ------------------ 4 or 12% 10,001-18,000 s.f. ------------------ 16 or 48% 22, 001-40,•000 s.f. ----------------- 5 or 15% 1. 9 units or 27% satisfy the 80% area standard (per Section 10.U3, Subdivision 6 A (1) existing lots of record that satisfy 80% of the area standard do not require ►ariance review) 2. 5 of these 9 units contain 36.000 s.f. to 39,0 '- s.f. in area an, are Legally combined as is the sub jec. property. 11. The property consis's of 39,300 s.f. in area and 136 feet of lot width. 12. The Registrar of Titles Office confirms the earliest record of the property appears in 1952. The division of Let 27 (separation of 15 feet along the north br dary) took place before 1952 as well as the legal combination -t the property. 13. The house was built in 1955 prior to the C ty adopting lot standards for development. The City adopted zoning districts designating residential areas in 1950 but never established standards or setbacks for construction. Page 4 of 9 City of ORONO RESOLUIFION Ut THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 14. In 1959, the ity adopted a minimum lot size ordinance re iring approval by the ''ty before a building permit could be issued fc;r any lot less :,,,.n 1 acre in area acid 140 feet at the building line. 15. Since September 14, 1967 to the pzesent '.he property has been located • i+-hin a residential zoning dishict :-cquiring 12 acre in area E,rd 100 feet of lot width. i6. The property is served with sewer and water and has been assessed for . water unit and 1 sewer unit (1 plant charge and lineal footage). 11. On May 12, 1980, the City Council appr..v ..i a st eet setback variance for the applicant to construct a 24'x25' detached garav* on the property. TK.e site plan placed the garage rig' on t:.- sr- ed lot line. Tb Planninj Commission, ..t th_ :; r May 1980 ate, ing, spec? 'ical 1. n . ­�d the fo1 lc-.: ng: ' , taff 7onfirm that Lots 27 <nnn 18 are 2. _gal ly combined befoL�. uuildi ng per^ i; is issutc 18. A - -,it inspection of Lot 2h t1-ono staff has eonfirA,,.d chat either a drainage or retenti -ea for a sma. . �?atershec exists within the proposed bui i envelope of propoz,a Lot n_ 19. The neighbors most affected have all written tr the City asking that the City Id the standards of the LR-1C Zr.^ing District. rs are summarized as foi',.)w_ : a) crystal Afid Shade. ; �,'Pbor a I - e . �r- cr., ec b) ne -i ve p.:ecedent would be establi st,ed with future ,I -division annlication .-e-uesting %-ariances with :-LI:.divisions c' tl,- -eque: t is in complete conflict with the lakeshore nvirt- ntal policies of the C '-.1. Mrs. Du A. Ta or of 18,.. -.,b iweod Read (imme6l �e neighbor to so,..:.0 has .gin; _rmEd ii % -itinr hat on Janua, 1906, the Appl.,.cant att( -)tee- to purch.,se 15 feet of her property which she rE- "-used. 21. At lie P' 1n::ing Commission meeting of March 17, t6. the Planni:lc; ... ^:l is ; zd unanimous y to deny the applic tion for subdivfsior. .%nd var_:_Aj,:es based on the follov,.-. findings - Page 5 of 9 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. "a) multiple 1-iriances sought are excessive b) applicant has not submitted sufficient evidence of a hardship which is unique to that particular circumstance" 22. The granting of the lot area, IoL width and hardcover variances woulc result in the following violations of Section 11.02, Subdivision 1.0 of. tho Subdivision Regulations with which the applicant must first comply before the required v 7iances can be grF .nted : a) the apl - ; cant has -,v � en able to demonstrate an unusual har. hip on the !zn.. to warrant the granting of variances to he subdivision code; b) the proposed subdivision with multiple variar . wil. pose a detriment to the public welfare by permitting intense dev�lonment of sensitive lakeshore property within the •sc vercrowded Crystal Bay/Shadywood neighborhood; surrounding )rope•ty owners claim that to allow the standard lot to bf developed would diminish their ,,.operty values; d) the applicant has failed '-o demonstrate that there exists unique coi,k...tions to the property to permit the c anting of these multiple variances; .. e) to not enforce the standard; of this Chapter and permit these variances would result i.i environmentally unsound development and be complete conflict with the overall policies and goals c ..he Comprehensive Municipal Plan of the City as follow, Orono's Planning Goals 1. THE FOREMOST GUIDING PR _IFLE AND GOAL OF ' .'•-)NO'S PLANNING IS TO PRO:'LCT AND PRESERVE LAKE MINN-2C.14KA, ITS WATER QUALITY AND YTS RECREATIONAL ASSETS. This gcal continues ; ..ommA.- at estab' ; shed at least twenty five y- -s ago.. It include. .reservation of .the associa-ed !*,.: s'lland, wetlands ana natural drainageways as the only practical, oast effective way of preventing flooding and of filteri.,g out the nutrient pollution from storm water run( '. 7. TO PROMOTF DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY AT DENSITIES CONSISTENT WI`PH ENVIRONMF'TAL PROTECTION AND THE PL1' NNED LAND USE PATTLRN. Paae 6 of 9 Ci v-- - of OR ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Orono':: Planning Policies 1. FUTURE DEVEL. 'MENT WILL BE GUIDED TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE THE LAKE MINNETONKA WATERSHED. Lake Minnetonka has local and regional significance as a vital ingredient in human experience and in the quality of life of all Orono residents. No development will be permitted that would have a detrimental effect on the Lake. 6. NATURAL .A"T'RES AND SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTS WILL BE PROTECTED BY: JRi.INANC;ES BASED UPON EXTENSIVE INVENTORY, ANALYSIS AND E!7 ::iLISHED ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION GUIDELINES. Natural resource information will be used and evaluated in review of all land use developments. Ordinance provisions will be reasonably establ_ -ed, fairly interpretted and strictly enforced. Urban Planning Policies 4. URBAN DEVELOPMENTS WILT, BE CAREFULLY SCREENED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY. Most of Orono's urban neighborhoods are located very close to Lake Minnetonka, therefore any urba.. development has the potential for direct adverse impact on the Lake. Storm water runoff control, erosion and sedimentation are particular concerns requiring careful design attention in all new urban (9,�ve.lopments. In addition, particular care will be tz n to preserve open spaces, wooded areas ad solar a,.:cess. f) the multiple variances sought by this applicant will greatly vary the minimum requirements for a new lot within the LR-lC Zoning District. 23. At the �uncil meeting of April 2" 1986, when Council conceptually denied the aprl'ca;-.ion ,r subdivision and variances, members advised the -lica,-4-,* that a subdivision that needed variances to the min;mur. c standards for the creation of a new building site would have to be denied by the City. 24. Since January 1 ,1975, with the inception of the current Zoning Code and the adoption of new :standards for lakeshore development, the City Council has not granted variances to the minimum lot area or width standards with subdivisions that create new building sites. 25. In granting multiple variances to lot standardi such as requested in this application, Council would abandon a long- standing established policy in the review of subdivision applications and thereby establish an adverse precedent in the future review of similar applications. Page 7 of 9 City of ORO�TO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _ 26. The City's ordinance, define distinctly different review procedures for the sep%ration of commonly owned substandard sewered lots with independent property indentifications and legal descriptions and for the separation of prorarties that consist of two or more lots that have been legally combined and defined with a single property identification and a single deed or cggistered land survey. 27. Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 % (1), ( 2 ) & ( 3 ) defines the review procedure for existing -ecord lots to be developed for a single family dwelling use. Each commonly owned lot is permitted this review procedure. 28. Legally combined 10ts CFtn only be separated per the standards and directives set forth in Chapter 11, the subdivision regulations of the City as follows: a) legally combined lots separated on existing lot lines are not subject to the regulations of this Chapter if the resulting parcels meet the requirements of the Zoning Chapter of the City Code. b) legally combined lots separated on existing lot lines are subject to the regulations of this Chapter if the resulting parcels do not meet tl�e requirements of the Zoning Chapter of Ine City Code. c) legally combined lots separated by a proposed new division line are not subject to the regulations of this Chapter if the resulting parcels meeL the requirements of the Zoning Chapter of the City Code. d) legally combined lots separated by a proposed new division line are subject to the regulations of this Chapter if the resulting parcels do not meet the requirements o:` the Zoning Chapter of the City Code. 29. T1 ty has never approved the division or separation of substai, zd lots that were legally c-,mbined as one conforming record lot. 30. The applicant, in an attempt to purchase additional land from the adjacent property owner, recognzied the limitations of the proposed new bui ldina site and the need for the additional area and width. Page 8 of 9 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 31. Denial of the rep uired variances, and therefore denial of the subdivision app_ication, does not constitute a taking of property or loss of substantial value because the property has always been one residential building site, all of which has served as required area, yard and open space for the residence which continues to occupy said property. Applicant Hall pur- chased the property in 1979 with a deed that defined -_he property as one property containing one residence, has enjoyed its benefits as a fully conforming residential lot within the LR-lC Zoning District for seven years, as did the previous owners for over thirty years, and can continue to enjoy the same benefits and value without the requested subdivision. 32. The applicant has not introduced any evidence contrary to any of the above findings of fact. The applicant has claimed only that the property would be of greater value to him if he could sell Lot A with the existing house so that he may build a new home more suitable to his current needs, and particularly if he can obtain full riparian rights for the proposed new building site. ?Adopted by the City Council of the C: ty of Orono on the 27th of ray, 1986. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor Page 9 of 9 MEFTING JUN 2 3 19$6 r TO: Orono Council FROM: Michael P. Gaffron DATE: June 18, 1986 SOBJ: #1019 Ralph D. Martinson Assoc., Inc., 2525 Woodhaven Dr. -- Final Subdivision - Resolution The applicant has completed ell ,equirements of the Preliminary Subdivisicn Approval Resolution No. 1990. A resolution of the final plat approval is at -,-.ached for Council approval. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF WOODHAVEN THIRD ADDITION FILE #1019 WHEREAS, The City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orferly, economic and safe development of land witlin the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision plat by Ralph D. Martinson Associates, Inc., the subdivider; and WHEREAS, Lots 1 and 2 of the subdivision require a variance to the public street frontage requi-ement because both lots front on a private road rathc.L than a public street; 3nG WHEREAS, the subdivision ha ; been found to meet all other standards of the RR-lB zoning district finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that will allow its use as a single family residence to be fully developed without the need of any variances; and WHEREAS, the subCivic.er has completed all requirements of the t-ing regulations of the City, including: 1. Completion of all. the requirements of Resolution No. 1990. 2. Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fee in the amount of $200.00 ? Payment to the C:.ty for the legal review and filing of ti.a plat easements and covenants in the amount of $75.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Woodhaven Third Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota; subject to the following conditions: 1. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Recorder's office on or before December 23, 1986 together with a certified original copy of this Resolution. Page 1 of 2 The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. ;n that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. ATTEST: City Clerk Dated this 23rd day of June, 1986. Mayor 1 I ^Y CN�� A MEETING' JUN 2 31986 To: Orono Council Members F V R r") From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator Date: June 19, 1986 Subject: #1022, Charles A. Schall, 605 Park Lane - Variance - Second Review - Resolution You will recall that this item was tabled at your last meeting to accomodate the request by James MacKinnon, attorney representing the n^ -ors, Stan and Betty Rudd. Mr. MacKinnon has submitted a lette itlining the Rudd's concerns. List of Exhibits A- Letter from MacKinnon 2- Memo and exhibits of 6/5/86 MACKINNON, 8TANCKE & ► REENE, LTD. F_AW OFF"Ir'ES 1 771 7 HIGHVJAY 7 MINNETONKA. MINNESOTA 5t,245 JAME_SO MI.CKINNON RO©ERT A STANDKE MARK E GREENE AREA CODE 612 DANIEL © GREENSTEIN June 19, 1986 -T F t F R!,-BONE -17.1 3221 ERIC C DAMMEYFIA Mayor and Council Members City of- Orono Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55723 r,c.: Appli::ation No. 1022 Charles A. Scha.11 Our offices represent Stan and Betty Rudd with respect to the above application. In your review of the variance request, I would lika you to consider two things. Fiist, if you have been able to take the time to visit the site, I think you will realize that in this area of Crono the houses are very close together. Immediately to the north of the Rudds' hclsli there is a very hign, shear wall and building, and the Scha'1s' proposal would create a similar structure immed..ately to the south. The net effect would be to close t-e Rudd property in to the e%tent that they would feel more like they were living in a townhouse than on a lake lot. It is effects such as this that I believe yc>; are to consider when you: are balancing the supposed "hardship" of an e_pplicant against the invasion of the rights of the neighbors. Secondly, I would like to point out to you that I do not think that one Council I►as the legal authority to grant the application as presented. It is my understanding that in order to grant the request, you need to find a bonafide hardship. I understand that it is ^nmmonly held ' e1,e:y house deserves a garage and in this day ai,d age it iE� _easonable to provide, where possinle, that a house would have a two -car garage. In this case, the need for the garage and its practical location probably do provide a bonafide hardship fa-^ the construction of a garage, but the hardship clearly en:is there. There is ab.3cl•itely no evidence whatsoever that there is any hardship with--espe,-:t to the desire to build a belroom above the garage. The Schalis have stated variously that they would like an -�: tra bedroo' i, -'hat they think it would be nice for resale purposes and that Mrs. Schall needs a place to get away. None of these is a hardship and their attempt to piggy -back this recruest for a third bedroom onto what appears to be a lgg._:imate request for a variance with respect to the garage is not in keeping with the law regarding variances. If that were the case, people could build whatever and wherever they wanted provided part of the new structu - was supported by a hardship. It is my undor_ste-,ing that in the past the City has aliowed people to buj d serond stories over structures which are not within the setback requirements, but it is my undeLs' nding that City staff _s now having second thoughts %Pith respe to that policy because, in effect, whatthey were doing is -_flowing an expansion of a non-conforminger %hich is not per_Atted under vour ordina*^ ,s absent another variance. This situation is also different ii that v.-u are not being presented wit, an existing structure, b-i:, ratt.er you are being presented with a request to create a new structure and putting reasonable conQtraints upon this new structure would not deviate from your past practices and would be in keeping with the scheme of your ordinances. Mr. and Mrs. Rudd support the variance request with re _ect to the construction of a garage, but ask that you deny the request with respect to the construction of the bedroom above the -arage because no hardship exist, with respect to this second floor room -,d the impact upon the Rudd property wcald bs: detrinental. ry truly yours, MACKINN , STANDKE & GREENE, LTD. James 'MacK i nron JDM/VrB To: Orono Counc=' Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assir nt Zoning Administrator Date: June 5, 1986 s..Ibject: #1022, Char.le shall, 605 Park Lane - Variance - R,.. . t.ion List of Exhibits A- Final Proposal As Recommended For Approval by Planni►;g Commission B- Planning Commission Minutes 5/19/86 C- Planning Commission Minutes 4/21/86 D- Memo to Planning Commission nested 5/16/86 E- ,xhibits to Planning ..ommission Dated 4/16/86 Please review the memos, exhibits, and m.nutes attached. Bri.:r ly, the applicar,t:s wish to replace their existing 1-car en.d- loadin^ garage with a 2-car s. ­lclding garage with a room above it to be Lsed as a second bedroom and for s ` .,.age space. They also wish to c ►struct a new entryway on tae souti side of the house. During the Planning Corr i ssion review of this applicatir , the neighbor to the immediate no �, objected to the height of the proposed addition because it would ..it sunlight to Lheir deck above the garage, and would create a cl id,in" fe^. ng. A r.r.view of the neighbors deck area by staff cjLid not substantiate that sunlight. would be sc -e: ened y the additicn, a ] though staff did recognize that the addition will change hr ?ercei ved "openness-" of the neighboring p,,,.perty. The applicants and nFighb r5 -spent a month review; .ig possible revisions of the proposal which would be acceptable to both vartiEs. No comrromise was reach J. Plann' Com-•;ssion at their 5/19/86 meeting acted upon the original appli '.ores voting 4-2 to ar)nrove the original garage proposal as submit+-ed• with a revised ry plan moving it further west to avoi ] -he existing well, wit'. current removal of the front sid^walk �no lakes )re. yard :r ,ckbed hardcover, but allowing them to maintain '-ne r ,tiro existing drivciyay hardcc�, �.,._ r as a backup apron. SAC L�-L7 Ji�titf '�v=�� f n.!^i AI- +7 �1 Zoning File #1022 June 5, 1986 Page 2 of 2 To sumar.ize the variances requested: Additional Existing Proposed 1) 0-75' 167.5 s.f. - Hardcover or 4.1% 2) 75-250' 2220 s.f. 430 s.f. Hardcover or 48.8% or 9.5% 3) Right Side Setback: Required = 10' Proposed = 7.7' Variance = 2.3' or 23% 4) Street Se::back: Requi d = 35' Propos,A = 3.5' (existing = 1.7') Variance = 31.5' or 90% Removals Final Proposed Hardcover 65 s.f. or 102.5 s.f. 1.6% or 2.5% (net reduction) 274 s.f. 2376 s.f. 6.0% or 52.2% (3.4% increase) A resolution reflecting the Planning Commission recommendation is attached for your review. Staff would strongly recommend inclusion of the condition that this and future additions above the garage may be no higher than that proposed at this ti•iv, given that side setback requiremc rits and the height limitatio ..:; are provided in the Zoning Code to pi eser %re the amount of 1 i ght, , r, and open space in a neighborhood, and a side setback variance is being granted. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 FILE #1022 WHEREAS, Charles A. Schall (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 605 Park Lane within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 15, Block 6, Minnetonka Summit Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except that part of �rvid lot lying South of a line drawn parallel with and distant `'5 feet Southerly of the North line of said lot; (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal 'Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to increase hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone from 48.8% to 52.2% where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed, and a variance to Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to allow construction of a side - loading attached garage which will be located 7.7 feet from the side lot line where a 10 foot setback is normally required, and located 3.5 fec', from the sl:­?et lot line where a 35 foot setback is normally required. Minnesota: NOW, ThEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1022. 2. The property is located in the IR-1B Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning ;district. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 19, 1986, and recommended approval of the proposed variance basel upon than following findings: A) The proposed side -loading garage is potentially safer than the existing end -loading garage, although this is a very low -traffic street. B) The proposed garage will provide a greater set..ick from I he street than the existing garage. Page 1 of 5 C) There is no other location on the property in which to construct a 2-car garage due to the required 10 foot separation between structures and the close proximity of the house to the south, which is only 0.5 feet from the lot line. D) The Orono Zoning Code grants no specific view or sun- light rights to the neighboring property owners as regards the street yard of their property. E1 The 2nd-story room over the garage is reasonable considering the small size of the lot, and is preferable to a horizontal expansion of the house which would create additional hardcover. F) The applicant has revised the entryway proposal to meet the well setback requirements. G) For safety purposes it is reasonable to allow the applicant to keep the entire existing paved parking apron in order to provide a backup area to avoid backing out into the street. H) No other land is available for applicant to purchase in order to make his property more conforming. I) There is existing hardcover in the 0-75' and 75-250' setback zones which can be removed to partially offset the proposed additional hardcover. 4. BecaLyse one of the general purposes of sideyard setback and height requirements in the Zoning Code is to maximize the amount of open space, air, and sunlight in a neighborhood, it is appropriate to restrict the height of this garage addition, given the side setback variance allowed. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and comments by the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Tonin(_j Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to increase hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone from 48.8% to 52.2% where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed, and a variance to Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to allow construction of side -loading attached garage which will be located 7.7 feet from the side lot line where a 10 foot setback is normally required, and located 3.5 feet from the street lot line where a 35 foot setback is normally required, subject to the following conditions: 1. This approval is granted only for the garage/upper room addition proposed at this time, with roof peak approximately 3 feet below the peak of the existing roof of the house. Extention of the garage/upper room peak height above that height approved with this application is prohibited. 2. Prior to final inspection and occupancy of the proposed additions, applicant shall remove the following items of existing hardcover: Front Sidewalk - 69 s.f. Portion of Existing Driveway Pavement - 49 s.f. Plastic Under Rock Beds in Lakeshore Yard - 221 s.f. 3. The hardcover on the property is limited as follows: 0-75' setback zone: Hardcover may not exceed 102.5 s.f. or 2.5% 75-250' setback zone: Hardcover is limited to the following items: House With Garage and Entryway (with short sidewalk) Driveway and Backup Apron Sidewalk Decks 1,450 s.f. 599 s.f. 217 s.f. 110 s.f. ------------- 2,376 s.f. or 52.2% Applicant is advised that any future development of the property which will create additional hardcover will not be approved, and might be approved only with concurrent removals of existing hardcover resulting in no net increase of hardcover. Page 3 of 5 4. Authorities granted by this variance run wit`► the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (June 9, 1987). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 9th day of June, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 4 of 5 6X�l , (� /- -mac MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 19, 1986 #1020 SUBURBAN HENNEPIN PURR DISTRICT continued Neil Webber stated that the educational aspect of the park is very critical because this particular park is a very unique situation and the public should be made aware of it. fie stated that their concerns also include density and that the 25,000 annual visitor number is not a "goal" just a potential number. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by McDonald, recommend to reject the proposal specifically in connection with the concept of the visitor center and parking lot. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 2. Goetten and — — - ---Be-1-Lo- oted nay. K6#1022 CHARLES A. SCHALL 05 PARK LANE 1 VARIANCE - SECOND REVIEW Charles,a-:d Marilyn Schall were present for this matter along with their contractor, Marty Bethke. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that the applj_ant and neighbor were not able to reach a compr.mising solution. He explained the proposed plan which consisted of an entry addition and a garage with a second story storage room area. The garage addition is proposed at 7.7' from side setback, 3.5' from street setback, and proposed at 20' in height (30' allowed). He noted that hardcover trade-offs would create a small decrease in existing hardcover. Stan & Betty Rudd, 601 Park Lane, were present for this matter. Mr. Rudd stated that they were agreeable to a garage addition 15' in height. He submitted photos. blr. liethke stated that an addition at 15' height would create an unusible space above garage. It was noted in Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron's memo that Chief Kilbo felt that the proposed access to garage is no more unsafe than the existing situation. Bellows stated that she felt some of the hardcover proposed to be removed for trade-off should be kept for back-up apron to provide safety. Mr. Scha 1 1 stated that the proposed room above garage addition will be used as a second bedroom because the existing house is only 1-112 bedrooms. 6 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD 1�iAY 19, 1986 #1022 SCHALL continued It was ,roved by Callahan, seconded by McDonald, to recommend approval of the proposed plan with the back-up apron hardcover to remain. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 2. Bellows and Kelley voted nay. Bellows stated that she recognizes the hardship but felt the applicant bought in to the situation and that the area is already very much overbuilt. #1023 ROLLA M. MARTIN 2675 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 10:15 - 10:19 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Rolla and Nancy Martin were present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the the request for a hardcover variance to construct a bedroom addition in the 75-250' area which would increase the hardcover from 26.8 % to 27.1 %, no hardcover trade-off is proposed. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by McDonald, to recommend approval as proposed. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. #1025 EDWARD P. HENRICH 4115 HIGHWOOD ROAD VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 7:41 - 7:42 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. Edward and Phyllis Henrich were present and requested chat this application be tabled. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by McDonald to table this matter at this time. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. #1027 PHILLIP PILLSBURY 1200 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 10:20 - 10:35 The hffidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing ti: z s not-d . ," 0-r , (__ MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 21, 1986 - - Wiz: #1021 JAN & NORA ACKURBERG 4075 HIGHNOOG ROAD VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 12:32 - 12:35 A.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Nora Ackerberg was present for this matter. lkssistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request to add hardcover with concurrent hardcover removal all within the 75-250' setback zone. No one was presentfrom the public regarding this matter and the public hearinc; was closed. Chairman Kelley stand he found no problem with this request, and felt that he would rather grant the additional hardcover (gravel over plastic) near the house so no basement water problems would result. it was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Rovegno, to recommend approval of the hardcover variance increase of approximates'•: 150 s.f. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 1022 S A. 3CHALL -605 PARK LANE VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 12:35 - 1:01 A.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Mr. & Mrs. Charles Schall were present for this matter along with their builder, 1.1arty Bethke. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request or hardcover and setback variances to construct a new attached garage, 2nd story room and entryway. The proposed 221x22' garage will be 7.7' from the north lot line, and a'iout 3.5' from the street. Existing hardcover in the 75-250' zone is 48.8% and would increase 8.6% with the proposed addition, however with the potential of 9.0% in hardcover removals there would be a net decrease in overali hardcover. He pointed out the areas in which could be removed as hardcover. Bellows stated because of the concurrent hardcover removal that hardcover is not a major issue. She stated that she felt the access to the garage as proposed would be e;:tremely difficult. In addition, she felt there was no hardship involved in needing the second story room above the garage which would affect the adjacent neighbor by shading their deck. ]b MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 21, 1986 #1022 SCRALL continued Mr. Schall stated that ti-ere are similar situated garages in that area that seem to have no problem with access. Taylor also expressed the lack of hardship involved in needing the second story room. Mr. Schall stated that they need the extra room for storage basically because there is no room on the lot nor a storage shed. Mz�.rty Bethke stated that the extra room above the garage i.e. extra height is mainly for roof line aesthetics to the house. He :toted that it is not a full story, it would only be 3' higher on the outside. Rovegno asked Zoning Administrator Mabusth if the applicant already had the garage, would there be a variance involved to add a second story. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that they would issue a building permit and she would have to consult with the City Attorney to see if they could legally place a condition restricting them from adding a second story. Stan & Bette Rudd, 601 Park Lane (adjacent property owner on both -i_des of applicant), were present for this matter. Mrs. Rudd stated that there were not opposed to the garage addition, but feel ,that the second story would spoil the value of their house and would take away the little sunlight they have for their deck and totally block their view. She stated that the house is too big a house for the lot. Mr. Rudd stated he felt there would be a pr)tential fire hazard involve because of the closeness of the houses. There were no other comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. Because of the neighbors rights and opposition to the second story proposal, it was moved by Bellows, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to table this matter for the applicant and neighbor to try and work out a solution. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Bellows, to approve th(, Minutes of the March 17, 1986 Planning Commission mr•c•ting as submitted. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. 17 C YO L" 6 -; -- mac_ TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE: May 16, 1986 SUBJ: #1022 Charles A. Schall, 605 Park Lane - Variance - Second Review NOTE: Please refer to your April 21 packet material for this item. Planning Commission tabled this item to allow applicants and neighbors to consider a compromise to the height and extent of the second floor room/storage addition over the proposed garage. Staff met with the affected parties on Wednesday, May 14, and no conclusions were reached, although additional alternatives were discussed. A solution might be worked out in time for the May 19 meeting. Any information submitted to staff Monday will be delivered to you at the meeting. A review of the site, and walking on the neighbor's deck, indicates to me that the neighbors concerns are mainly esthetic, i.e. they will feel "penned in" if a very high addition is constructed; they will lose view of the lake at the end of Park Lane although this view is minimal now; and there is a potential for midwinter partial loss cf sunshine to the deck if the existing roof line of Schalls home is continued. To: Planning Commission From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administra*.or Date: April, 16, 1986 Subject: #1022, Chprles A. Schall, 605 Park Lane - Variance - Public fearing ZONING DISTRICT- LR-1B APPLICATION- Hardcover and setback variances to construct a new attached garage, 2nd story room and entryway. LIST OF EXHIBITS A- Application B- Plat Map C- Property Owners List D- Elevations, Layout of Building E- Proposed Additions (Survey) F- Existing Hardcover (Survey) G- Hardcover Proposed Additions and Potential Removals H- Hardcover Calculati is Existing Hardcover 0-75'=4% (No changes proposed) Existing Hardcover 75-250'-40.8% Proposed Additional 75-25'j' Hardcover = 8.6% Potential 75-250' Hardcover Removals =9.0% (Potential Slight Net Decrease in overall Hardcover) This is a 0.19 acre Lakeshore props rty with a small existing house and attached 1-car garage exiting directly to the street. The existing garage is 1.7 feet from the right-of-way of Park Lane. There also is an adjacent parking apron on the south side of the garage. Because of the small lot area and the existing sidewalks, deck, paved areas, rock beds with plastic, etc., the hardcover on this property is quite extensive. The existing house is 3.6' from the north lot line, and about 10-12' from the neighboring house. Applicant is requesting to add a 221x22' attached garage on the street side of the house, loading from the south side, plus a 51x16' entryway on the south side of the house. The new garage is proposed to include a 2nd story room, and wi 11 be 7.7' from the north lot line, and about 3.5' from the street, both technically requiring setback variances. Applicant has not specified which (if any) items of exisf-nq hardcover will be removed; however, I have reviewed the existing hard, :�r and find that there are substantial areas that can potentially be renoved in order to offset the increases. This is, of course, an item for Planning Commission to discuss with the applicant. FURTHER ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: 1 ) Is the property large enough to justify variances for a major new MEMO #1022 Charles A. Schall April 16, 1986 Page 2 of 2 structural addition? How 11 the 2-story garage addition affect neighboring properties? 2) Note that while this is a very low traffic area, the side -loading garage will make egress from the property easier, but what about making the sharp U-Lurn into a south facing garage? 3 ) The 5'xl6' entryway as proposed will be only 1' away from the well. State Well Code requires a 3' setback from well to structures or overhangs for maintenance purposes. Staff would not recommend a variance to this requirement without specific app-oval from the Minnesota Health Department Inspector. Perhaps t' - entry can be redesigned. In making a recommendation to the Council on this request, consider the above information and consider whether there are demonstrated hardships justifying the granting of the requested variances. • � � � Cirri �� ,,�� � � j la-rr t,'. _ �/ � L1 ly �� CITY OF 6RONO - VARIANCE APPLICATIO Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PROPERTY LOCATION ''� v Site Address (oO-S �H2%- dk�1 -" Property Identif ication Number (P. I.D. ) 06 - Ili - 2.3 q/ 00 qg Please check one -- Is the property ✓"abstract or torrens? Please attach legal description to app�ication if not included on required survey. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name ��C s ii Phone 1/73 Mailing Address �D� /�g,e/� I-4A/E L2,)6- Na/ S-J 3I L -------------------------------------------------------------------------- OWNER Name Sec i�134J ✓e Phone Mailing Address Date Property Acquired �- 7y (month/year) I HW) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present 'Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 3o,OOd Describe request in detail: i . . A _-#-- - - VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot - rea Lot Width VX I1ardcover Setback Variances ( Front ,id R r) 'fit- --0 O* h c r _ S 4C,&1-:1" (OVER) HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practi enforcement of zoning requlati.ons: --� V---------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDIT.T.ONS 1 difficulty resulting from strict Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code l�� Requirements: 'n&.o..t--P A&AAA.r.r--' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain thi:� list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is net complete if the above information has not been included. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to payallfeesand/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied istrue and correct to the best ofh'iss/her knowledge. Applicant's signature (jd4,. Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of. request. Owner's signature Date 3-3044, --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meetinq. Planning Commission !1,-etings are held on the third Monday of each month. LAKESHORE SETBACK ZONE 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' Directions: A. Existing lot area in zone L f H ORQNO HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEE'P Proposed C. Existing E. Prop B. Existing D. Proposed F. Allowed hardcover hardcover hardcover hardcover hardcover percentage percentage in zone [(B:A) x 100) in zone [(D?A) x 100) Percentag= Y(/bo sf ( Z sf Li 3 % :v /b sf L S' % 25 sf sf /o sf 9p 30 sf sf % sf % 35 i� ,'2<sf A. Existing Lot Area in Zone - includes the total square footage of dry buildable land within the specified zone. B. Existing Hardcover in Zone - includes the square footage of existing roofs, decks, sidewalks, driveways (oravel or paved) and other rain -impervious surfaces within the specified zone. C. Existing Hardcover Percentage - divide the number in B by the number in A and multiply by 100. D. Proposed Hardcover in Zone - includes the existing hardcover plus all proposed additional hardcover. E. Proposed Hardcover Percentages - divide the number in D by the number in A and multiply by 100. F. Allowed Hardcover Percentages - if the percentages in column E for any setback zone exceed the allowed percentages in column F, you should contact the Zoning Department at 473-7357 to discuss the possibilities of obtaining a variance. Generally, if a concurrent removal of existing hardcover matches the additional hardcover proposed, resulting in no net increase of hardcover in a specified zone, a variance may not be necessary. to ............. 4--(3?4 CO-) Al iy ...0 7114 • sit kit . . . . ......... S' ej cn cq rUl T, P, 4NN to I- - 7%. . - - ;4 oil Ott '-w 3AV J? 4 !YN 1 'J% 0 3c fit Ic If 94, i jwc vol y w W11 AJ3 mg -W IAJ Sp "q ej As 44 C-JA zj in 40, -9 b 1b 40' % 1b %401 CD 7 - ON V 4 40' . .......... qp 67 _T ALE V 70N Ski &-40UA"Ofo �~ ��-�� v 3 7't ,IT v * ` S �1 ti 0 ;4.0• i40.s7' — — .JS Z• 4c 30 k- Oro Z7.9- r'J� :l• , 86 —1+,. -T•,,, Atip DO /vE W o CV n 6FA J T �i 1 . 1-1,Y Iy�+ 3 �!S L-DCATIG/v •�AD O L �X�TrNC� Nn2v�a��t � 1 � I 20.E � aiws OiYZ It I V Ca C • C i � • ♦ � 1•` Ir rr �` •�• • a �J L � `. At r 'U P Loke /fannafcnk� x� `IL V �• • 1 •t. �• L :� C' O%y t•� S 6.04 ~ '� t • ,6, j a tr • .�Jr C_ �` +., C c. by `• O ►• ^ • t► +mot . M low• fv fit .rl 44 Lakc Rol 9.>,cn.��,a � G► ply / 0 t-•-/arc �i..rr � 1 ma Tr A-a,L) veep (r- wA'L L �o, sx s�� = Z7.S s . /UO Cµ A?J C-se'5 'i hr 1 you Ste" �2�,2 x 3`•i, 2•� � �9Ca D 12 I v c- WA Dc-Cr.- C3x2C.•�X$� _ NO s�n�w,�c.r+c C3'X qo'� �CYxy� = zap G+"v�N ESL 40r'�.;,rl C II o '2S- t �IJ D c.c) vtW. �" Pa10 .4 b1iQIV(yIp,�/ Iwrnj — TUFT Ft: T'L 2f30 s!�. ! IQ J:� Ui 7-1 O ti 4--L = g �. . _)'Jo -- 10 No �. Pcn.yno" I sr z .�. n• y � C . �� �s�r-iNcA �2►�cZ.1r ���-►�n1 x'7 = LlI g441� Gov r2 -- / re'^ S 4k%-1Md V A e. I-0� t-� t`-tca i -7-C-) 1� kf--" elcl�X-10\j Qz— Zz�zZ �I�.�•L � /qqpuUei-r ..1-7- /11 mer7Ne-, 4-ro OF y-/y 8c JUN 2 3 19K ZONING FILE NO. 1026 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 6/17/86 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: COPIES TO: John Vogt Mrs. Harold Peterman 107 Lakeview Ave. 160 Old Crystal Bay Rd. Long Lake, MN 55356 Long Lake, MN 55356 Mike Hilbelink 1020 North Brown Rd. Long Lake, MN 55356 -------------------------------------- ----------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: Subdivision --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of Meeting: 6/16/86 Vote: 5 For 2 Against Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval: Subject to conditions noted below. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: The Planning Commission -voted to recommend approval of your proposed 3 lot plat. Staff has drafted a resolution granting preliminary approval of your application for Council action at their meeting of June 23, 1986. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed r Council - June 23, 1986 If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please --)ntact the Zoning Department (473-7357). •ou desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, ....ey are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. a TO: Mayor butler Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE: June 17, 1986 SOBJ: #1026 Mike Hilbelink/John Vogt, 160 Old Crystal Bay Rd. Preliminary Subdivision - Second Review Zoning District - RR-lB Total Area - 18.486 Dry Acres Application - Class III Subdivision - Plat - 3 Lots Lot 1 = 3.115 Acres Lot 2 = 6.715 Acres Lot 3 = 8.657 Acres List of Exhibits - A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Wetlands Map E - Septic Test Map F - Existing Pattern of Roadways G - Sketch of Future Road Plan H - Sketch of Future Road Plan I - Preliminary Plat Review of Application - The applicants propose a 3 lot division of the 18+ acre Peterman homestead. Lot 1 contains all of the existing homestead's structures. All structures meet the required RR-lB setback standards from the newly created lot lines - the animal barn is 15b+ feet from the east lot line. Septic tests have not been required for lots 2 & 3 because each parcel exceeds 5 acres in area. Lot 1 has been tested to assure that there is adequate area for future septic expansion. Septic tests confirm adequate, suitable area to the west (front yard of home). Access has been the crucial issue for this review. Staff has asked that access to the future building site on lot 3 be located at either the extreme east or west of the property line adjacent to Watertown Road. The 50 feet wide corridor providing access to lot 2 has been approved by the City Engineer finding the 275 feet required sight distance for a 40 mph speed limit satisfied. The majority of the Planning Commission refused to consider the issue of future access. Review Exhibit F, staff's original proposal showed a 25 feet wide access corridor along the northern property lire as a possible link to a future extension of Woodhaven Drive. Zoning File #1026 June 17, 1986 Page 2 of 2 It is difficult to determine the best location of future access corridors to the immediate east given the limited density of this current subdivision and the underdeveloped lands that surround this property to the north and east. The minority of two questioned staff's choice of the northern corridor as a possible link with Woodhaven Drive and recommended instead that a future access defined as a 25 feet outlot be designated along the west property line of lots 2 & 3 up to the southeast corner of lot 1. The outlot would serve to define all future accesses to developed lots within the 10+ acre parcel to the immediate west of subject property and lot 3 of this subdivision. This would eliminate additional curb cuts onto Watertown and Old Crystal Bay Roads. In Exhibits G & H, staff has drawn two sketches for future through road development for Council's consideration, clearly there are many more variations on this theme. The predominant theme through is the east/west link (extension of Woodhaven Drive to Old Crystal Bay Road) and a north/south link (extension from Woodhaven Drive to Watertown Road). Council must decide if this specific property will be involved in either an east/west link or serve as a future private road. If not, the designation of the 25 feet wide outlot along the northern property is not necessary. The minority has recommended a limited cul de sac type private road to serve as future accesses to lot 3 and the corner parcel to the west as they are developed. If Council concurs with the majority of the Planning Commission that this is not the concern nor the business of the City to determine future accesses to undevFl.oped properties then the 25 feet wide outlot along the western 1> >perty line of lots 2 & 3 is also not necessary. At•a minimum, staff strongly urges that you support the minority opinion'i request for the west property line outlot in order to discourage the haphazard creation of curb cuts within an intersection area that has definite safety concerns. The majority opinion adopted all conditions of the staff recommendation except for the road outlots. The staff resolution has been drafted subject to Council's decision regarding the designation of road outlots. A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 160 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD APPLICATION #1026 WHEREAS, Michael J. Hi lbe link and John Vogt on April 25, 1986 filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a three lot plat of a property legally described as follows: The North 5.41 chains of the west 14.81 chains of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 and the east 30.46 rods of the west 14.81 chains of the south 58.36 rods of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 33, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXCEPT unplatted roads. (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 19, 1986, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on June 23, 1986, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of Michael J. Hilbelink and John Vogt (hereinafter "the applicants") citing the following findings: 1. The property is located within the RR-lB rural residential zoning district requiring a minimum of 2 acres of dry contiguous land within each newly created lot. 2. The property consists of a total 18.486 acres of dry land. Lot 1 contains 3.115 acres, Lot 2 contains 6.715 acres and Lot 3 contains 8.657 acres. 3. All existing structures on Lot 1 meet the required setback from all proposed lot lines. 4. Lot 2 has only 50 feet of frontage on Old Crystal Bay Road where 200 feet of frontage is required. 5. The City Engineer has confirmed that the location of the proposed 50 feet wide access to Lot 2 satisfies the 40 mph sighting standard of 275 feet and will provide no potential hazards for the public who use the access corridor or Old Crystal Bay Rd. Paqe 1 of 6 6. A single family residence can be constructed on Lots 2 and 3 without the need of further variances. 7. Septic testing has confirmed that Lot 1 has adequate and suitable area for future septic expansion. 8. The Public Works Coordinator recommends that access to Lot 3 be either at the extreme east or west side of the lot in order to assure safe use and access to the property. 9. The property is surrounded by large acred tracts with a single residence on tract. 10. Per Section 11.02 General Provision of the Subdivision Regulation's Chapter, the City Council shall be guided by the following Policies and Purpo:-es: CHAPTER 11 SUBDIVISION REGULATION (PLATTING) SECTION 11.01. CHAPTER ESTABLISHED. Subdivision ..nd platting of land in the City shall be regulated as follows: SEC. 11.02. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Subd. 1. Policy. • I A. It is hereby declared to be the policy of the City to consider the subdivision of land and the subsequent development of subdivided land as subject to the control of the City pursuant to the official Comprehensive Municipal Plan of the City and this Chapter for the orderly, planned, efficient, and economical development of the City. B. Land to be subdivided shall be of such character that it can be used safely for building purposes without danger to health or peril from fire, flood, or other menace. Land shall not be subdivided until available public and private facilities and improvements exist and proper provision has been made for drainage, water, sewerage, and capital improvements such as schools, parks, recreation facilities, transportation facilities and other public improvements. Page 2 of 6 C. The existing and proposed public and private improvements shall conform to and be properly related to the proposals shown in the Comprehensive Municipal Plan of the City and it is intended that this Chapter shall supplement and facilitate the enforcement of the provisions and standards contained in the official controls and Comprehensive Municipal Plan of the City. • Subd. 2. ^urposes. This Chapter is adopted for the following purposes: A. To protect and provide for the public health, safety, and general welfare of the City and to prevent harm to the public health, safety and general welfare. B. To guide the future growth and development of the City in accordance with the Comprehensive Municipal Plan. C. '"o provide for adequate light, air, and privacy, to secure safety from fire, flood, and other danger, and to prevent overcrowding of the land and undue congestion of population. D. To protect the character of the land to be divided as well as the surrounding lands and the social and economic stability of all parts of the City and to encourage the orderly and beneficial development of all parts of the City. E. To protect and conserve the value of land throughout the City and the value of structures and other improve- ments upon the land, and to minimize the conflicts among the uses of land. F. To guide public and private policy and action in order to provide adequate and efficient transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, playgrounds, recreation and other public requirements and facilities. G. To provide the most beneficial relationship between the uses of land and buildings and the circulation of traffic throughout the City having particular regard to the avoidance of congestion in the streets and highways, and the pedestrian traffic movements appropriate to the various uses of land and buildings, and to provide for the proper location and width of streets and building lines. H. To establish reasonable standards of design and procedures for subdivisions and resubdivisions, in order to further the orderly layout and use of land; and to insure proper legal descriptions and monumenting of subdivided land. Page 3 of r; I. To insure that public and private facilities are available and will have a sufficient capacity to serve the proposed subdivision. J. To prevent the pollution of air, streams, ponds, wetlands, Lake Minnetonka and other bodies of water; to provide reasonable access to public waters; to assure the adequacy of drainage facilities; to safeguard the water table; and to encourage the wise use and management of natural resources throughout the City to prevent their misus-,, abuse and overuse and in order to •preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the community and the value of the land. 11. The City Attorney, Kathleen Blatz, in a memo dated May 12, 1986, addressed the issue of whether the City had the authority to design street patterns through proposed subdi- visions or prospective subdivision. The City may plan for the development of streets without adopting an official map setting forth the same. While Minnesota Statutes recognize that official maps are tools to effectuate the implementation of a comprehensive plan, th- statutes do not require their use for the planni, of streets. Should the City choose to address future traffic patterns and their effect on the City by adopting plans laying out streets and roads, it would be advisable that the plan be adopted in an orderly, schematic way. Specifically, the City should avoid the appearance that the requirements for roads are simply piecemeal decisions for the City, and not based on any coherant plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon either one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat application of Michael J. iiilbelink and John Vogt involving the property located at 160 Old Crystal Bay Road per the preliminary plat drawings by Phillip A. Nelson dated May 17, 1986, and further grants a street frontage variance for Lot 2 subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicants must dedicate right-of-way for Old Crystal Bay Road and Watertown Road. Page 4 of 6 2. Applicants mi. st provide 25 feet wide out lots for future road development on the plat as follows: a) 25 feet wide outlot along northern property line of Lot 2. b) 25 feet wide outlot along western property line . f Lots 2 and 3 extending from Watertown Road right-of-way to the northeast corner of Lot 1. 3. Applicants are hereby advised that if it is their intent to subdivide in the future that care be taken in selecting home sites so that variances are not required to the RR-lB Zoning Standards as a future City Council may not approve variances to lot standards with a subdivision. The RR-lB Zoning Standards are as follows: Front/Street Setback = 50' Rear Setback = 50' Side Setback = 30' Area = 2 Acres Day Contiguous land The following list of final submittals must be submitted ' , the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly sche- duled Council meeting on the second and fourth Monday of the month: Final Plat Submittals l..RECORD PLAT drawings in the fotw of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200'. Drawing to include: a) Lot lines platted per preliminary survey b) Dedication of right-of-w for Old Crystal Bay and Watertown Roads. c) Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' wide along all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of internal property lines. d) Designate 25 feet wide outlot along the northern property line of Lot 2 and the western property 'A ines of Lots 2 & 3 from Watertown Road right-of-way to southeast corner of Lot 1. Page 5 of 6 2. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: a) -i.tle Opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage no lders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b) The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. c) Executed road and utility easement (see s , ie enclosed) granted to City over road outlots; legal de. .•iption to be filled out as follows: Outlots _ & _, plat name, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 3. FEES TO BE PAID: Total Due $425.00 a) Park Dedicai on Fees per current schedule, calculated as follows: $100.00 each for Lots 2 & 3, Total fee of $200.00 b) Final Plat Fee of $150.00 c) ; 1.:_ing Fee for plat and associated documents $75.00 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 23rd day of June, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M .allin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Page 6 of 6 617u 1 CITY OF ORONO SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM M Date Rec' d By ytt.' Fee QRec'd .3!„t) . vn -# ,V. J' 7s -----------------------------------------------------------------•------ APPLICANT Name Mike Hi 1 bel i nk / �Vo t_ Telephone �+, 6-1867/473-3298 M.H.- 1020 N. Brown Rd., Long Lake*, Ma .55356 Mailing Address 4 V. - 107 Lakeview Ave. , Long Lake, Mn. 55356 _ PROPERTY Name A As 0 `� pe 1 Q r' yy!d y� Telephone OWNER Mailing Address 160 01CC/ 71i41 (Attach 'list if me 2 than one) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCAT' Street Address A-1 G v Property Identification No. (P.I.D. ) .33 - I �F - a 3 - ` 3 - OOO,;� Complete Legal Des:---ption o be attach to a lica 'on EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size ==_75— Acres Dry Land Tres, Wet Land ces Total, all parcels Present Use (cr.ck) !� Zesidential; no. of units Other (specify) Present Zoning District ----- ------------------------------------------------------------- ---- PROPOSAL _ Division for Tax Purposes _ Lot Dine Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) _ V Oubdivisior for New Building Sites Number of 9incj Sites: � Existing Units New Units _ Total Units Proposed Gross Dens y 3 Units per %ef 2 S Acrc.: Minimum Lot Size: -35 �-QSquare Feet Dry Buildable Land Pronrsed Use: (check) !/ Residential _ Other (speci°v) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (OVER) 93 "MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Application Completed 2. Preliminary Plat info ,i r: Certificate of Survey. 3.; Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 4. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Di -------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) (�(, 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable orm of s0 ecurity. 6 Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signaturc Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------- FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) $150.00 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivis4ons) C250.00�, Preliminary Review $300.00 plus (Class III and all non-residential) 20.00/lot Final Plat Review (Class III) $150.00* *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attor: ey, Planning Commission and Council r , ..;sary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional te�5 established by ordinance. Applicant's Si —, Date Owner's Signature ^& v,. Date f - ;2 - Y4 Applicant must have all submittal into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are usually held on the third Monday of each month. R'-TJ DATE 04/18/86 BATCH 001 38 04-117-23 12 0002 p. PROP ADDR 02645 WATERTOWN RD =,ER NAME W P DICKEY ETAL TAXPAYER 14TLLIAM P DICKEY NAME/ADDR 2645 WATERT%..N RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 31 OC12 PROP ADDR 00245 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N C:a:ER NAME AGNES HEINLEN ET AL k/L EST TA:'PAYER THOMAS C ALDRICH II �. NAME/ADDR 245 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N ORONO Nit 55356 /'t 38 33-118-23 34 0 03 PROP ADDR O1^:J-cR NAME RUTH F WEAR JP T1.}:PAYER RUTH F WEAR NAME/ADDR LC':G LAKE MN 55356 ob 38 33-118-23 43 0001 PROP ADDR 02760 WATERTOWN RD 0,;,NER NAME GRACE L ROSCH TAXPAYER MRS GRACE ROSCH NA!:-c/ADDR 2760 WATERTOWN RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 33 33-118-23 43 0005 �. PPOP ADDR OC620 WATERTOWN RD OWNER NAME JOiiN HALLSON TAXPAYER JOHN T HALLSON H,%ME/ADDR 2056 GRAND AVE S r LOHS LAKE MI 55356 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 04-117-23 12 0005 DICON DICON 21350 EXCELSIOR BLVD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 33-118-23 34 0001 00185 OLD CRYSTAL BAY 7D N L S STUBBS ETAL LYDON SHERWOOD STUBBS LONG LAKE MTJ 55356 38 33-118-23 41 0008 02565 WOODHAVEN DR DOUGLA'.L OGREN ETAL DOUGLAS L OCPEN 2565 WOODHAVEN DRIVE LONG LAKE Mtl 55356 38 33-118-23 43 0002 00160 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N LILLIAN B PETERMAN LILLIAN B PETERMAN 160 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD NO LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 44 0001 02590 WATERTOWN RD ROBERT F SUES`_ `TAL RCBERT F SUES., 2590 S WATERTO:::. RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 1 38 33-118-23 31 0007 60225 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N S K GOLDSMITH A L D SCHWIE S K GOLDSMITH & L D SCHWIE 1017 EAST WAYZATA BLVD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 33-113-23 34 0002 00115 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N VERNICE LILLIAN WHITE VERNICE L WHITE 115 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 42 0001 00320 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N C H MEYER ETAL RICHARD D & PATRICIA M MEYER 823 COPELAND RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 33-118-23 43 0004 OZ640 WATERTOI.'N RD T P GORMAN & L T GORMAN T P & L T GORMAN 2640 WATERTC:IN RD S ORONO MN 55356 TOTAL BATCH 001 OOOi-. 4 olft RUN DATE 04/18/66 BATCH 001 Oft opk HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI43WI PAGE 2 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO E BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. �J DATEY�Y f(JL - N. 81 Ch - ►v Ua 6 C) OU a& 2 a� ?, -� a� AID 3 6„9�nv � (3 M . � kw, IO,kcl \/Iy,Q,u �a4� I-NORTHERN- 4240 1.85 UI ADD. of -- 8 ^n 32 1 • GURLINGTON — OFKWO O 31 ;es ra - ra w4 „ A 42 C" v d ar (Y� `i 42.0 SPRUCE ..a On. I s..... rb. �w y , ,« 5 z G e KOM son bug M � LOB-, I rt � LM Y b ;- - - SEC 4 T !17, R 23 n [` /1 PG" �M,Ko��-y n as 6�a►�`� fold +r. • c v M Gs' c•iss a+ '. V b►' i i • i- i %.4 9 0 Y • "V ", U 7H 3t / f» 401 cay or onow ww .. BURLINGTON - i f t : f • � --�r 1 MORriEAr. - - - OA, 4210 42- V - ----- SpRUCE size Road s :� r• •o. d s: m 1 ,• S • r�JD& P14- — ---- — ----- - — " t ,.w I _ r— (� ld • I ow °i . .I ;�` i • le . .:o _ y — i !!j a Z a � • � Lot • ;,, � � OROND •6,6 - :s» J! Ro / :." ifAIn O o 4 . SEG q T f17, R 23 (\) n43 44 (i V g d Y. L.V a ., U tN tM 461 wile 401 gFr ACRES s S J&V • . w cU 65AL •• `' f AMU AM" u ?b 490 f•Sf �' br►. a lam) •�, •N #_ � LA LNE �." � pf�Y . `11 • l t i Q• J1) � � �) r �Q , L . SEC 4, T 17 R. 2 Z n43 n44 SUM L*NI rr's • P f m V` We %WVA&# • • i fr Vo # i s • i` u* v u LL;l I� JIM s � 3 � w,r � � H � 42 an a caoio �, zcuscsv��� s « t TV aw ACRES `•� sew ) _ ! ` SPRUCE r Wd .N1 ..., — e.— eAs • s.s s- saw (4) / Am = / � U N Lot M 36.0 `fi W _ . �O'T S t4lV4, es�e RON- SEC , T R_• 3 \3 % n43 • .. 444 • ,5 ksj efo,, I ? r a,(i 4 x 1 i • 1 ..ti r 192 � - Vol •� —row—+ _ W —� •"NA wttoo 4 e s •� i 0• n44 /llarih hnt of the SW /# . a -�, j. k Sd /► of Su. 33, 7'118r R.?3 00 LOT I I� - WQ I� pl, �., olI N LOT 2 l .w I �• N 47+10 Sa8'59% — - L South line or Me North 5.41 C. ;57 11 � 31 )l bD Ili droW pitmen}& 1 - SOZAZ _ r—ems ' � I � N �3 I t � N tr N (� LOT 3 i I� I i I __J S ao WATERTOWN ROAD tiirr� JUN � 3 iJu6 To: Orono Council Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administre-or Date: June 18, 1986 Subject: #1033 Royal J. Dossett, 2795 Pheasant Road - Variance Seco-d Rex iew Council voted to table this .item at t June 9 meeting, in order that the Council members who had not visited the site could do so. The applicant has been in co,itact with staff and he notes that he has reviewed his proposal e-,:i due to the house layout cannot feasibly redesign the screen pL,,Lch to fall totally outside the 0-75' zone. He requests ',at you visit the property if at all possible in -. der that you can give his -oposal a fair and objective review. To: arono Council "embers From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant 'fanning & Zoning Administrator Date: June 5" '986 Subject-: #1033 xoyal J Dossett, 2795 Pheasant Road - Variance Resolution Please revie•t Line Planning Commission memo and exhibits of 5/15/86 (attached), also the notice of Planniaq Commission action and sketch dated 5/23/86 (attached) and Planning Comma scion minutes aA. 5/19/86. Applicant is requesting hardcover variances for both 0-75' and 75-250' setback zones, and proposing structure (screen porch) partially within 0-75' zone, also an average setback variance. Planning Commission reviewed the appl` ion on 5/19/8', and recommended approval of the screen po and a "portion of th- patio as shown on tha 5/23/86 sketch. Pldiining Commission that the sidewalk and deck leading to the sid( door •inneccessary and -3t justified. The revised -tri noes as re, -_ iendnd by Planning Commission at - as follows: 0-75' 1) Structure in 0-75' 7 2) Hardcover: Existing = 100 s.f. (steps ike) = 1% Additional proposed per P1,) --rig Commission recommendation = 380 s. 3.t- TOTAL in C--7'' 4.4% 75-25J' Existing Hardco L. = 26.4% Proposed harp' fining Commission recumm�.. s s.f. = 6,548 s.f. = 26.7% A resoa? } ; u:: ref ; I -he • -la •n- nc ^ immissicn _eccr - encl+'_ Ls Attached f teV4C,.W Re. �r '=.ng t - request to eliminate the requirement of a full -vey of the property, staff would recommend acceptance of ..he vmification by surveyor of t..e hardcover percentarges and lakeshore setbacK of the existing and propo ee; structures prior to .issue ce of rermits, (Any discrepancy would be returned to "^unci 1 r review.) ZONING FILE.. NO. 1033 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COM14ISSION ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 gate of Notice: 5/23/86 ----------------------- -------------------------------------------•-------- TO: COPIES TO: Royal J. Dossett 2795 Pheasant Road Excelsior, MN 55331 TTPE OF APPLICATION: Variance ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of Meeting: 5-i�-85 Vote: 5 For 0 Again, Planning Commission recommends thF- following: Approval: t bject to conJitions noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: R-corr-- nded approv-1 of porch and partial patio :iardcover as shown in -ac". ; exhibit. ApL ,it's next scheduled ic.eting is confirmed as: Council June 9, 1986 " the applicant has -ouble obtaining additional information, please ..ita,7t the Zoning Depaztment (4:3-7357). If you desire certified copies of he cffirial Plani—ng Commission minutes, they are available from the City Re(-)rder after review and apprc.,al by the Planning Commission. Tu Planning Commission Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & zoning Administrator Date: May 15, 1986 Subject: #1033 Royal J. Dossett, 2795 Pheasant Road - Variance Zoning District - LR-lB Application - Request to add structure and hardcover exceeding limits in the 0-75' setback zone, average setback variance. Lot Area = 44,590 s.f. = 1.02 acre Existing 0-75' Hardcover = 0-1% (steps to lake) Proposed Additional 0-75' Hardcover = 514 s.f. = 4.�$ Existing 75-250' Hardcover = 6,456 s.f. = 26.3% Proposed 75-250' Hardcover = 6,669 s.f. = 27.2% Proposed Structure in 0-75' = 101x10' Glassed -in Porch List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Photos Exhibit E - Letter of Request Regarding Survey Exhibit F - Hardcover Calculations Exhibit G - Site Plan Exhibit H - Relationship to Neighboring Homes Exhibit I - Relationship to Lake (cross-section) Exhibit J - Floor Plan Exhibit K - Elevation Sketch Exhibit L - Letters From Neighbors The app! 'cant is requesting to construct a patio and porch onto his existir,4 home. The existing house is 77' from the lakeshore, hence any usable spa,7e created will require variances for structure (porch) in the 0-75' zone, hardcover variances in both 0-791 and 75- 250' zones, and an average setback variar^e. First, note that the house sits 15-21 above the lake on the flat terrace with a steep bank to the lakeshore. The neighboring house to the east is slightly closer to the lake (Exhibit H), and si'Cs at a lower level. A thick growth of pine trees will serve to screen the proposed addition from this residence. On the west side, the neighboring house is setback perhaps 100' and would nct have any view of t torch addition. Both neighbors have submitted 'etters of supr. of the proposal. Next note ir, your site inspection the location of doors on the lake side of the house. One set of doors was recently installed, the other set has always been there. There apparently has never been a terrace or patio onto which the doors opened out.. Zoning File #1033 May 15, 1986 Page 2 of 2 The house sits upon the approximate drainage break of the property. If the applicant maintains a system of gutters directing all roof drainage to the north, the only run-off moving to the lake on the south side would be generated within the 0-75' zone. In recent applications, the Council has allowed minor encroachments into the 0-75' zone: #1006 Palm, L/10 Shadywood Road - approved additional structure in place of existing patio hardcover, not to be any closer to the lake than existing hardcover. 0-75' hardcover 17.5%. #983 Pemberton, 3580 North Shore Drive - approved new structure and hardcover in 0-75' zone. 0-75' hardcover 20%. #943 Purdy, 1975 Fagerness Point Road - approved additional 71 s.f. of structural hardcover with concurrent major removals o.L other 0-75' hardcover (reduction from 24.3% to 13.9%). #932 Edwards, 2474 Carman Street - approved variances for a new residence to be constructed partially within the 0-75' setback area based on 1) surface drainage naturally graded away from the lake, and 2) lakeshore at both front and rear of property so that neighbors requested that location of new house conform to the existing houses for view purposes. 0-75' hardcover 15.8%. #920 Fegers, 3590 North Shore Drive - approved variances to allow a deck and screen porch of 123 square feet in 0-75' setback area with concurrent removals of 0-75' hardcover resulting in no net 0-75' hardcover increase. Approval 0-75' hardcover 3.2%. #907 Bigham, 1545 Long Lake Boulevard - allowed to increase 0•- 75' structural hardcover from 1.9% to 3.3% due to location of existing house. These are applications from l/l/85 to the present. Additional similar nvplicati.ons have been approved prior to that date. In order i o recoi, and approval of the Dossett variance requests, you should make appropriate findings justifying that approval. In regards to the request to eliminate the requirement of a full survey, staff would feel comfortable with a verification of the hard- cover and side and lakeshore setbacks of the existing and proposed structures. evi.•1(c"`I r-/ (;-, •1C's FIr UC.e'5IL" t.;,, f;`,r;r..1;,:•S.�a %o CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Appli.catio^ Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance F.:e $75.00 (no change from original application) After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address%`7`� ��.(�+�►:�' ICd� G'r��r , �%NSJv ✓ )_ Property Identification Number ( P. I . D. ) 1 1 - t '2- 23 3Z OO L Please check one - Is the property abstract or X torrc .s? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name �oLj� �T L o�s�" Phone Mailing Address �'. �ih Kd , ���/� • . MN.S�r�� -- --- OWNER Name .SG1''*-C jhor t Mailing Address Date Property Acquired / 0/ 75 (month/year) I (do) do ------------ -- not --- also own the adjacent parcels of land. ------------------------------------ ---------------- PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property �Y _ Residential Other (specify) --------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost Describe request in detail: Ri1T?0J, , f k l j , - 7S C,V"(1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot v�idth _ Hardcover Setback Variances ( Front Side Rear) Other r•.�t Ki ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical di ficul enforcement of zoning regulatiop s: .4/P"eM/4- �., resulting from strict d"., 1 v .,/.- - --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address-. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. "he Applicant anC Property Owner must sign this application. Please .tember that your variance application is not complete if the above aformation has not been included. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature — Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and CCLrLil members for purposes of investiga- tion and verification o this request. Owner's Signature / 1 _ Date/�-,) k ------------------------ - ----------------------------- T-------------- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. 5 23 7 -V 114 22 w1k. 4F.0 c 7' 'iff to 0 Z41 8 WIG. N t'-lol 9 \010 .21 w Part of IND Lot lo v F1977 S. Vol A IV 12 PART OF LOT 10 VF Z LL C NO PUrN DATE 05/0^/36 BATCH 006 38 21-117-23 23 0014 .- PRCP ADDR NAME PHEASANT LAWN HOME=IERS TAN7AYER PHEASANT LAL1 HOMEMNERS NAME/ADCR 2760 PLEASA.rr RD !� EXCELSIOR rN 55331 33 21-117-23 32 0001 PROP ADDR 0:791 PHEASANT FD C:":EP NAME L N & L C S .M:T 71-XPAYER LELAND N SUNDET Nml.F/. ''SR 2741 rHEASANT FD EXCELSIOR r": 55331 3-3 21-117-23 32 0004 PROP ACCR 02670 PHEASANT RD C:; :'R ':. XE CAP OL 4 BURGESS �- TAXPAYER C;PD L H EURGESS NAME/ADDR 2300 PHEASANT PD EXCELSIOR MN 53331 Oft Aft Aft HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 21-117-23 23 0015 02760 PHEASANT RD EDWARD M MAHONEY ETAL EDWARD M MAHONEY 2760 PHEASANT ROAD EXCELSIOR Yt 55331 38 21-117-73 32 0002 02795 PHEASANT RD ROYAL J COSSETT & WIFE ROYAL & SYNNEVA DOSSETT Z795 PHEASANT ROLL, EXCELSIOR MH 55331 33 21-117-23 32 0005 C2739 FHEASANT RD PAUL L PCIILE ETAL PAUL L POHLE 2739 PHEASANT RD RR 2 EXCELSIOR Mil 55331 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 12 38 21-117-23 23 0025 02765 PHEASANT PO STEPHEN L BAKKE ETAL STEPHEN L BAKKE 2765 PHEASANT RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 33 21 -23 32 0003 02799 PHEASAIT RD ELMER J MARTINSON EUIER J MARTINSON 2799 PHEASANT RD EXCELSIOR Irl 55331 TOTAL BATCH 006 00003 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT GF PROPE TY TAXATION, TO E BEST OF MY KNOWLEOCE AIJD BELIEF. /� /"1 ��� DAT4 - f�'//y X Y i rl . ........ El April 29, 1986 Planning Commission City of l.r r­ Due to the high estimated cost of a full survey (to $850), I would like to appeal to the Commission to relax somewhat the req '.rements involved in seeking a particular variance. Our house sets back 77' from nigh lake level. The 0-75' area is 150' wide, and irre*fitly has 0% hardcover. The house was built around 1943 and Pay or may not have had wal-::; patios, etc. in tt past (we tore out some ag-ag flagstone once) . : a. . is well -screened by spruce and ether trees t n '..oth east and west pros )rty lines. The two. egresses to the lakcsidi, kitchen (new) and d.r room (original), currently step out onto grass. There is marginal oppor.Anity to use the lakeside due to either wet grass, mosquitoes, or bees. or all of these. And there '.s a great deal of tracking into the house from the lakeside. We would like -.o add a three -season (unheated) porch and patio covering approximately 5% of the 0-75% area. The neighbors o:_ either side (lots 10 and 12) have no objections. The cu^rent hardcover and proposed hardcover are approximately as follows: current 0-75' 0% 75-250 26% 250-315 5% proposed 5% 26% { about 20% 5% { if 75'-315' area Enclosed is a section of a plat, plus a z �, of the property showing existing hardcover and variance desired. Dlmensiot. a from existing iron corners NE, SE, and SW, and existing, iron stakes Fong east property line. Duo to the large land ,ea and conservative existing hardcover, and since the variance ..:,ly affee. , the 0-75' crea, we would like to request the Commission only require certification of: i . set:,ack fro.:, lakeshore to house 2. approximat%-urrent .iardeove,- percentages The major costs of a surv-y would be 1) confirming the existing corners, a moot point since it is the setback from actual lakeshore that is of concern and not from property lines, and 2) super -accurate hardcover measurements (especially driveway), again a moot point since hardcover beyond _1 is conservative and not directly in-olved in the variance. I appeal to yo,r• senae of reasonableness. If the proposed variance is reasonable, and a full ­,irvey can be waived, I wi: _ submit a tvrm. � application for variance anal hire a surveyor to measure and certify setback dimensluns and hardcover percentages. 'rank you for ,dour attenti•-)n. -- Royal J Uosaett 17 Pucassnt Rd Exce,.sic• .:Y 55?31 471-9252 (home,, , 471-0240 (ot flce ) LAKESHORE 'TBACK 2�_-4E -75' ..0-,n0f 5' - 1COJ' ORONO HAP.r -oVER CALCULATION WORKrHEET A. Existing B. �'xistinq C. Eri.sting D. Proposed E. Proposed F. Allowed h�_3cover hardcover lot area hardcover hardcover hardcover in zone in zone perc:e:.tage in zone percentages pe �ntage [ (B:A) x 1001 [ (D.A) x 10 A�-Sb sf 0 ^� _ �� �' sf 4-r--747 sf V S-G sf 2. V,e sf sf sf 4, % SAC sf -- — sf oyo sf 2- fe-7 -,, e 90 30 i 35 /� Cire. _ Pius •��.3 :��.`!v B� lc�v�� �� i 2 fo A. ist: Lo. Area in Zone - includes the total square fcot:ige of dry buildable land ithir e spazif ied zone. 3 cis.ing Hardcover in Zone - includes the square footage of existing roofs, decks, sidewalks, '.-:-".ways (grav • -r i.avrd) and o'-k -- rain -impervious surfaces within the specified zone. C. Exi -:.ing Hard- ;.er Perce 4e - d,.l•-.de the number in B by the number in r; and multiply by 100. D. :rr:posed Hardcover in Zoi includes tho existing hardcover plus all proposed additional ;.drdcover. F Proposed Hardcover Percentages - div?.de the num' �r in D by t'- number in A and -ultiply by 100. : Allc.he Hardcover ' -centaaes - if the percentages in col urm;. for any setback )ne exceed the ai..,wed percer Age ir. . luma F, you should contact the--,nir- Department 4c 473-7357 to discusq the posizi'v;iities of obtain-incr a variance. Generally, f a concurrent removal or e-isti,ig hardcover match,. the additional hardcover proposed, resulting in . , net increase of dcover it �peci ,` ied zunc, a var:.a .r...y not be necessary. #10�3 6� 2ASW �x j34- jf4o as LS, 31 .GY r tit�� �4 �7s-vK° C ♦�cxio} - 213 �' r... 1.. 0- 7c1 21c� 4!.1 VG4i G C� Op 1 7 g1t.1 40 d ��J M r' �4 4S ZSI 3► r.. 1.. I''- -I c I 0 So ir Z!r L-4 10 77 jerl, sehrzL I CVY e (4�e .Seal e 4 .11 4 Qu�� G',�fS•SP�fi� .j � Ali .�.e� � mac. ,�� �..� ZZ� zvvt4, W #1033 A RESOLUTION GRAN`iING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 i 2 AND SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 FILE #1033 WHEREAS, Royal J. Dossett (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 2795 Pheasant Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 11, Block 1, Pheasant Lawn, Hennepin County, Minnesota, (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 and 2 to permit the construction of a screen porch, deck, and patio which constitue structure in the 0--75 foot Lakeshore setback zone where no structure is normally allowed, and increasing hardcover in the 0-75' setback zone from 1% to 5.5% where no hardcover is normally allowed, and increasing hardcover in the 75-250' setback zone from 26.4% to 27.2% where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed, and which will extend closer to the lak^ _han the average distance to the lake of the adjacent properties. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1033. 2. The property is located in the LR-lB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 19, 1986, and recommended partial approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: A) The screen porch as proposed will not encroach on any views enjoyed by the neighboring property owners. The neighboring property owners have expressed their support for the proposal. B) The majority of the drainage from the existing house runs away from the lake and onto the 75-250' setback zone. If applicant maintains a gutter system directing roof drainage to the 75-250' setback zone, the only runoff moving directly toward the lake will be that generated in the 0-75' setback zone. Paqe ] of 4 C) The screen porch and a portion of the patio are reasonable to allow the applicant enjoyment of his lakeshore yard, but the sidewalk and small deck near the west entry doot area is unnecessary and not justified. 4. Applicant's hardship is the location of the existing house which was constructed prior to the 75 foot setback requirement. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports b,� City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Dning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances, as amen_,cd herein, to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to permit the construction of a screen porch located 65' from the lakeshore where a 75' setback is normally required, and which screen porch is located closer to the shoreline tha.n the average distance fom the shoreline of the adjacent residences; and grants variances to Sections 10.22, Subdivision 2 and 10.55, Subdivision 8 to allow an increase in hardcover from 1% t^ 4.4% and allow structure within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone, ana to allow an increase in hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone from 26.4Fs to 26.7%, subject to the following conditions: 1. Hardcover permitted in the 0-75 100 s.f. - stairway to lake 100 s.f. - 10'x10' portion of 280 s.f. - patio and deck of to screen porch and foot setback is limited to: screen porch approximately 10'x28' adjacent parallel to house 480 s.f. TOTAL or 4.4% hardcover, as shown an Exhibit A attached Page 2 of 4 2. Hardcover permitted in the 75-250' setback zone is as follows: House 2,075 s.f. Driveway 3,880 s.f. Shed 501 s.f. Patio/Deck 60 s.f. West Entry Steps 32 s.f. 6,548 s.f. or 26.7% Hardcover, as shown on Exhibit A attached. 3. Applicant is advised that any future proposed additions which result in increased hardcover on the property will not be approved, and might be approved only with concurrent removals of existing hardcover resulting in no net increase in hardcover. 4. Applicant shall provide verification, certified by a surveyor, of the existin4 lakeshore setback of the existing house and of the hardcover percentages on the property, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (June 9, 1987). 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 9th day of June, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Halli.n, City Clerk Property Owner(s) Mary C. Butler, Mayor Page 3 of 4 I% JUN 2 3 1986 TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor Butler Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Jul,(,- 19, 1986 Zoning Administrator SUBJ: Bed & Breakfast Amendment Staff has amei,ded item (3 ) of the original staff amendment for a B&B based on Counc.;I's ciesire to control the number of such facilities. As staff advised at your last meeting, the City cannot limit the number of conditional use permits to be issued for B&B's. In light of Council's responsibility to protect the health, safety and welfare of it's residents and because the accumulative effect of several B&B's within a residential neighborhood can present a greater potential for safety or nuisance concerns with the more intense use of streets, noise level, etc. Staff suggests that B&B's ')e located on state, County, or M.S.A. streets and that a s(daration distance of at least 3,000 feet be required based on the density levels of Orono's zoning districts to assure that ne single nelghbz)rhood district wc,.11.d have more than one such facility. Bed & Breakfast Amendment June 19, 1986 Page 2 of 4 AMEND SECTIr 10.20, SUBDIVISION 3 BY ADDING THY k)LLOWING CONDITIONAL USE O - Bed & Breakfast Owner/resident of an existing residence/dwelling may provide guest rooms for the purpose of overnight lodging for financial compensation by reservation only, and where no provision is made for cooking in any guest rooms and regular meals are not provided on the premises and in which ingress and egress to and from all guest rooms is through the principal residence/dwelling. The following standards shall govern all Bed & Breakfast operations within the City: Planning Commission amended the underlined section to read as follows: No meals other than a light breakfast shall be provided on the premises. 1. The property must (select most suitable option): a) satisfy all lot standards for the given zoning district b) satisfy 150% of all applicable lot standards for the given zoning district c) satisfy all applicable lot standards for the given zoning district in addition to meeting the area ratio of 1/5, 1/4, 1/3 acre per guest room .. . but in no ce -e shall the number of guest roo ns exceed 6, 7, 8 Planning Commission selected the following option: The property must satisfy all applicable lot standards for the given zoning district in addition to meeting the area ratio of 1/4 acre per guest room, but in no case shall the number of guest rooms exceed 6. 2. The facility shall be owner occupied and serve as the princ' gal residence of owner. 3. The property must be located on a State, County, or M.S.A. street and not less than (3,000 , 4,000 ...?) feet from another Bed & Breakfast facility. Access to the site must not be shared with adjacent residential properties. Each: guest room must be provided with one off street parking stall/space, screened from adjacent residential lots with natural plantings. Plan,,ii.g Commission amended by adding the following: such screening to be of natural plantings. Bed & Breakfast Amendment June 19, 1986 Page 3 of 4 4. No on -site commercial. signage or lighting shall be allowed. All signage is limited to residential signs allowed under Section 10.61, Subdivision 2 A, B & C. Planning Commission amended by adding or lighting. 5. The Bed & Breakfast ope_ation shall have a state license (lodging), and comply with all applicable standards of the State Uniform Building Code and State Fire Code. 6. A conditional use permit must be issued annually for a Bed & Breakfast operation. Thin permit is not tray-`erable to a new owner. 7. All Bed & Breakfast guest use activities must be located 30', 401, 50' from adjacent lot lines. Planning Commission chose the 50' setback standard. 8. Sanitary facilities stall be adequate ':.o handle the proposed level of usage. Where municipal sewers are not available for connection, it shall be the responsibility of the applicant to demonstrate that the existing on -site sewage treatment facilities meet standards of the Orono On -Site Sewage Treatment Code for the proposed level of usage. In addition, applicant shall demonstrate that a suitable alternate drainfield site exists on the property. 9. An updated floor plan must be mai.ntaine6 by owner designating the following: a) location of guest rooms . b) location of guest bathrooms c) location of resident bedrooms d) location of resident bathrooms Planning Commission amended by adding the following: Applicants must submit landscape plan, site plan locating all improvements and guest activities and an updated flcor plan designating the following: 10. A property that has an established Bed & Breakfast shall not be permitted the following accessory or conditional uses: a) home occupation b) guest apartment or guest houses c) animal units must be satisfied by area catsid e of the area already credited for Bel & Breakfast use. Planning Commission amended by adding the following: and animals shal be maintained by owner/resident only. Bed & Breakfast Amendment June 19, 1986 Page 4 of 4 Council Action - To direct staff to prepare the ordinance amendment for publication, such amendment to be effective upon the date of publication. If members wish to deny, the following findings must be able to be made: 1. Proposed amendment is not in the best interest for the physical development of the City. 2. Negative impact on residential neighborhoods. 3. Potential hazard to the public, health, and welfare. 4. Detrimental effect on surrounding property values. L ORONO CITY COUNCIL: Attn: Mary Butler, Mayor As next door neighbors to the Anderson property, being considered for a Bed 6 Breakfast site, we would like it known that we very much favor this proposal. We feel the upgrading of this property, both buildings and grounds, would very much improve the area and would be an asset in Orono. The clientele using these establishments are paying for something out of the ordinary, such as, Victorian housing in peaceful, quiet surroundings. we wonder why this opposition when it should be noted there are two Comercial operations a half block away (Sailor's World 6 Transmission Garage) with far more noise and less beauty than this proposed renovation. 6 Ruth Aschenbeck 1930 Shoreline Drive Orono ft 11 53086.7 TO: May•), and City Council '' \\ FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator ��,77��V DATE: May 30, 1986 SUBJECT: Baldur Park Road J6i31986 1 ` V JF PRON10 Attached please find a letter of request from the resident at 1384 Baldur Park Road. As it is noted in the letter this property plus the ones beyond are served by a private driveway part of which is on a platted City easement. The situation has existed for a number of years and the private road has been maintained privately in the City's right-of-way. The public maintenance stops just short of this property. As noted in the letter the shoreline has eroded away and approximately 3 feet of the area of which is correctly City platted right-of-way has been eaten away so that now the shoreline at a few points is right at the edge of the travelled surface of the private driveway. In order to stabilize the. situation it would require rip - rapping along the driveway where the shoreline has been eroded and this would cost approximately $4,000.00. There are other platted undeveloped right-of-way that residents use for private driveways. The City has not participated in costs for maintenance in the past. The desired rip rap is essentially done for protection of the Keesling property from further encroachment by the private access onto her property. ISSUES - The issues are as follows: 1. The responsibility the City may have to do any maintenance to retain the shoreline on property that is the City's. Failure to maintain does force a private driveway further onto other peoples property. • 2. Does the City have a legal obligation to rip -rap its property in order to protect a private road. 3. What, if any is the appropriate level of contribution by the City for installation of this rip -rap. 4. Should the City extend its public road and maintenance. 5. Does the City need to or desire to assess the project in order to have benefiting property owners pay or should it be done strictly on a contribution basis. RECOMMENDATION It is staff's recommendation that the City not contribute to this project. Additionally permits would be obtained by the City of Orono for the rip -rapping as it is the property owner. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by ___ ► to accept staf f's recommendation. Ayes , Nays _ . cc: tinny Keesling May 19, 1986 Mr Mark Bernhardson City Administrator Orono Village Office 1335 So. Brown Road Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Attentions Mr. Mark Berr.,ardson Subject: Baldur Park Road Gentlemen: Per our phone conversation of today, along with a visit with M-:. John Gerhardson last week, this is a formal request for assistance in Rip -Rapping part of Baldur Park Road. Enclosed is a copy of my Survey showing where Orono owns part of the road and the lakeshore. There are two houses beyond us on the point which use this road and something has to be done now with the roaO and I don't feel I should have to pay for it. Enclosed is also a copy of an estimate from Niccom. With the recent winds along with the high water, this road is becomming impassable. We have lived here about 6 years and have lost a good three feet of lakeshore, so consequently, the road is moving closer and closer to our garage. Please let me know or feel free to call me if you have questions. My number is 471-8679. Thank you. Ve truly yours, i Giany Keesling 1384 Baldur Park Roa Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 May 19, 1986 Mr Mark Bernhardson City Administrator Orono Village Office 1335 So. Brown Road Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Attentions Mr. Mark Berr.,ardson Subject: Baldur Park Road Gentlemen: Per our phone conversation of today, along with a visit with M-:. John Gerhardson last week, this is a formal request for assistance in Rip -Rapping part of Baldur Park Road. Enclosed is a copy of my Survey showing where Orono owns part of the road and the lakeshore. There are two houses beyond us on the point which use this road and something has to be done now with the roaO and I don't feel I should have to pay for it. Enclosed is also a copy of an estimate from Niccom. With the recent winds along with the high water, this road is becomming impassable. We have lived here about 6 years and have lost a good three feet of lakeshore, so consequently, the road is moving closer and closer to our garage. Please let me know or feel free to call me if you have questions. My number is 471-8679. Thank you. Ve truly yours, i Giany Keesling 1384 Baldur Park Roa Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 i I MINNETONKA PORTABLE DREDGING DOCK WORK SILL IMICKI NICCUM SEA WALLS RIP RAPPING 500 West Lake Street PILE DRIVING EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331 - f 474-9454 - 472-3457 .f roa� zlt� 1 • ji, . �% Tr r r , 04, MI. 4 IV- . Plat of Curvey . for Arthur ?. Gunderjoa ' in Lo'.b 19, 24, and 'U r► .r t Block 1, Baldur Park : Hennepin County, Mii�EtJ�,}• r� • n ;��"�•,`'- h ' 4'.' Er.rf..,q Certificate of Surveyc �' • T'�+'� ;� •,'+ t �i.�9P Z h". by certify that this is a t •1.:;•,;� � 14� and rorrect representation of a o° the boundaries of Lots 19, 20, abdd •� '4' part o" Lot 21 described as follovt' L ,� �'� r• �, \ %ginninF, on the meander line at the Ner sites ':�' :: ' erl.• dcorner -Nf said :,ot 21; thence Northw"tWtj ••rr or. Vsid line a d{ stanr4 or 50 feet to the Nosti•,� �•+' '�`� ''• � i + ves',er'_`• -r :-nf%r of said Lot, 21; ther► a Seli'triie t:.' ,4 . im ►• + diefeet; ther.re Se"..theaster1r or. .he Southeasterl line of said Lot• r•,feet Southwesterly from s^i'• Northeasterly ecrner; thence Nortbeast��ly .880 Southeasterly line f Qe , to the point efbeginr'_af` , all in B1oel 1� �• 4 • (RD&O t Park", and of the locailnn of all baildln,'a thereon. It does tot'jwr to ehov other irp ovementc or encronchmeets. For purpoeee of this• avaw4y, the 'AwwWor line" described is a.-4sume,? to be the dashed line (plat traverse or , �- line) shown cn the record plat arr-):s the Northeasterly pc'rt+on of said , } and the Northwesterly corner of Lot 21 is casumed to he interseetich etf �• 1.1� $ dashed line with the Northwesterl} line of said Lot 21. 44 i 1" 40', Gordon R . Coffin f0� W. h 1 .�_•y...►. '* >t G-? 7T+ fiend Surveyor a.nb 3';T•+' 0 '.. Iron marker Long Lake, MtiWwoo,ta J. - TO: FROM: 61886.2 Mayor and City Council Ga` -PING Mark Bernhardson, City Adminis trat o �V"t JUN 2 3 1986 DATE: June 1 1986 SUBJECT: Animal Control C -4 Since the last meeting the staff has been working to get more information on both Midwest Animal Control and Linda Kadlac together with discussing animal control services with Spring Park, Long Lake and Minnetonka Beach. RECOMMENDATION - Based on our review of :he contractors together with discussiori with Spring Park, Long Like and Minnetonka Beach it is staff's recommendation that from the 1st of July 1986 to the end of December 1986 the City enter into a contract with Linda Kadlac for animal control services for the City of Orono in line 1•ith the rates that she nas quoted. Additionally staff will work with Ms. Kadlac for an agreement for 1987. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by __ to accept staff's recommendation of award of an animal control contract to Linda Kadlac for the time period 1, July 1986 to 31, December 1986 together with directing staff of negotiate services for 1987. Ayes _, Nays _ lvvi'Lt( Uri 1�_1; ML;110 DATE: June 4, 1986 TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator and City Council FROM: Melvin Kilbo, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Animal Control Service As you may be aware from the news media, the White Bear Animal Control, Inc. is no longer in business in the City of Minneapolis and to our knowledge has ceased to exist as a group and is not handling our calls. On June 3, 1986 I sent, with concurrence of Mark, a letter to Mr. Thomas Angley, Sr., at White Bear Lake, Minn. stating the fact that the City of Orono was cancelling its current contract with White Bear Animal Control, Inc. in 10 days from the date of the letter. On May 29, 1986 I received a letter from Midwest Animal Services, Inc., having an address of 3228 Noble Avenue No. in Golden Valley. It was written by Richard Stenberg, President of Midwest Animal Services. It basically states that White Bear. Animal Control has ceased operation of the kennel and that Larry Smeija of Care Ani- mal Control Administrative Consulting Service was requested by White Bear Animal Control to provide service in Minneapolis during the month of May 1986 while the city set up its own program to be- gin June 1, 1986. At Mr. Smeija's request, Midwest Animal Service has agreed to provide animal control service for your community from June 1, 1986 to December 31, 1986 at the current contract's rates. Midwest states that they have received confirmation from the City of Minneapolis Health Dept. to continue boarding their animals at the Minneapolis kennel and their insurance company has been noti- fied and will be sending out a certificate of insurance. He also sent a letter from the Dept. of Health stating that they could board the animals there, with a charge of $5.65 for each day that the ani- mal is bo;.rded. After 5 days they maintain the right to destroy an unclaimed imal, the cost for tercination will be $7.25. At the present time we are on an emerge cy basis, continuing service with Midwest, however they have had problems at least in their first pickup that we asked them for, the fact that they did not respond for 6 hours. On Monday Mr. Richard Stenberq of Midwest Animal Services stopped out personally to talk to me. He indicated that they wish to follow up with a contract and that they wish to take the remainder of the contracts from White Bear Animal control at the same rates. They subsequently brought out a sample contract and a schedule for dog pat- rol services. This contract is very similar to the one we used with White Bear and Mapsi before then. I indicated that I was in no way accepting the contract, that I would bring it up to the city for re- view. He also indicated that he would continue this contract into 1987 if we so desire. They have also indicated that they will be transporting to the Minneapolis dog pound which is the same kennel facilities we had when we had White Bear Animal Control. We have had contact with the driver assigned to us as they have been out every day of last week and also this week. My secretary is quite con- cerned that their driver does not know the area and does not seem ter- ribly bright in picking up On the area and at time may be patrolling Other areas rather than Orono itself. I have reason to believe that Page 2. she was patrolling in Tonka Bay, when she claims that she was in Orono. We have a second person who is interested in doing animal control in the City of Orono. This party's name is Linda Kadlac of 19913 HIllside Drive in Rogers, Minnesota. She is currently the dog catcher in Champlin, having been there 4 years. She has been the Dayton dog catcher for 8 years and does patrol for Osseo on a demand basis, for 2 hours a week. She came in with a contract very similar to White Bear's and asked that we look at her service for contract a:3 early as February 25, 1986. She has taken courses in law enforce- ment, citations, public relations, public health, vicious animal handling, tranquilizer guns and drugs, and has been at this work for quite some time. She stated she would patrol at $12.00 per hour on a routine basis, on the times we set up and that she would come out on special calls for $21.00 per call. This contrasts with the $19.'_0 per hour for routine patrol by White Bear and by Midwest, and $20.00 by Midwest for special call outs. Midwest also has a $30.00 charge for service other than normal working hours, that being after 5:00 p.m. in the evening. Ms. Kadlac says she will impound the dogs at Corcoran Pet Care, which is on Co. Road 10 and 116, whhich is a licensed veterinary hospital. It is approximately 16 mir -S from the Police Station in Long Lake. She stated that Corcor;_ Care would charge $6.00 a day for pound fees. There woulC be no c-st for euthanasia and she stated further that the dogs do not go to ' "U" or any other research facility. I am enclosing a copy of the contract for both venders. In looking at the possible recommendations, I am quite concerned that the temporary hoarding facility granted to Midwest by Minneapolis might be withdra,an. I spoke with Mr. Stenberg about th:,s and he stated he has in he past, in the eastern part of the Metro area where he works, r. ,,�s use licensed veterinary hospitals to board dogs. I indicated that Ne have been unsuccessful in having them take over that prospect at this area. It is my concern that we may end up .having dogs impounded in White Bear Lake or in Forest Lake where he has had some of his service contracts. Whereas Linda Kadlac's pro- posal to have dogs boarded at the Corcoran Pet Care center is much, much more suitable to our immediate needs. Either one of these are not necessarily the best solution at this point, but I would recom- mend that we contract with Linda Kadlac and be lookinn for an heir apparent for the animal control function on the western suburbs towards the first of the year. In any event, I would suggest that the council contract only until the end of 1986, with whichever animal service they intent to go with as we may indeed have other solutions to our problems by the first of the year. 61286.4 41%PING TO: Mayor and City Council JUN 2 3 1 1986 FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratoll DATE: June 12, 1986 SUBJECT: C.D.B.G. Sewer Assessment Grant Program As you may be aware the staff has spent considerable effort over the months to get as much money as possible from as many resources for qualifying applicants in the Crystal Bay area to pay off their sewer assessment grants. As you will recall in February staff had obtained additional monies from the County and did pay off all but most of the assessment grants for 7 of the applicants leaving them the $500.00 plus the $1,062.08 of interest for 1986 to be paid with various arrangements that they can undertake payment. In addition 3 persons or the senior citizens deferral also were approved. Because of tha delay in receiving some of the Year XII committed money which should be available in August 1986 and also the fact that both their principal and interest has been deferred, available monies were split evenly among those three individuals leaving them a balance of the $1,062.08 in interest in 1986 together with $2,216.00 in principal. It was staff's feeling that this represented a fair reduction in cost for all of these individuals given each of their individual circumstances and the amount of money the City waL; able to obtain. Additionally it should be noted that the City was not able to get all the money it requested from the discretionary funds bask in February in part as there was no repayment agreement allowed under HUD regulations, that group felt it only appropriate that all the recipients pay a portion of their hookup. Subsequent to this in May a letter from a group entitled Concerned Orono Tax Payers, (with no names or no signature attached just a post office box), was sent to HUD complaining about th- City's assessment grant program. As a result of this the Cit; s had to take the following measures: Ensure all persons who are very low income not have to t,ay anything on tF 3rant -i.ther the assessment principal or any atte,: unt interest. - Certify that statement of repayment was not an issue and that the City did not initiate a repayment as part of this program. - Review complaints in the letter regarding certain applicants. I* Prior to this letter being sent it was determined that one grant recipient was not eligible as she had rented out her house arr' was not living at that address. This left a $8,750.00 to b_ distributed among the other recepients. After recalculating the information it was determined that money could be spread so that the 5 of the remaining 9 individuals who do qualify as very low income will have all of their principal and interest paid off, except for $3,877.00. Upon Council approval staff will submit a request to the County under its rehab program fnr the balance of this money and that this money will perhaps . eventually replenished out of next years discretionary funds. This grant program has been problematic and staff feels that the original program provided a fair amount. However, recent pronouncments from HUD have indicated that staff now have to ensure that there is no repayment agreement and additionally pay all the monies for the very low income qualifying applicants. I would like to personally thank Joan Lattin and John Gerhardson for all the efforts that they have put forth in this program together with the frustration and changing regulations. In addition Larry Blackstad of Hennepin County's Community Development P anning office, has worked very .,ard with the City of Orono to make this a successful program. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to direct staff to reapportion the money to pay for all the very income applicants that apply for the ha1ance of $3,877.00 from rehab monies from the County to cover the balance needed. Additionally Joan Lattin, John Gerhardson an:_ Larry Blackstad are commended for their multiple efforts in t ',ng to deal with a very tough and often tenuous program. Ayes Nays . 61286.2 17 V4 011 ll W TIMG TO Mayor and City Council J UN 2 31986 FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrate ( c OF ,..ti: n= DATE: June 12, 1986 SUBJECT: Authority to Approve Refunds It has been a practice, chough one established neither in ordinance or in law, that all refunds of monies given the City be referred to the Council for approval. This can often involve refunds of only a few do A. -rs to several hundred dollars, principally for application fees or permit fees that have been paid on which no ac`iDn 'has been taken. Generally staff has recommended refunds :',ss the actual staff costs to date. In order to expedite the Le`�.,ds and not create large time delays in returning the money to Life applicant it is requested that the Courr•il grant authority to the City Administrator to allow for re: ►ds up to $5,000.00, (a limit in line with the Administrator's purchasing authority under Ordinance 18, Second Section, Subdivision 4,(F), to refund monies to people for w:.ich the City has not provided the service for which they have applied for the monies. It is anticipated that this will provide for the proper accounting yet avoid the delay and the effort incorporated in giving Council approval to such refunds. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to adopt resolution granting the Administrator the authority to approve refunds up to $5,000-00 for persons who have paid money to the City for various service:--. Ayes Nays _ u City of OROLNO :x• ` RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL , Y NO. •; P A RESOLUTION GRANTING CITY ADMINISTRATOR AUTHORITY FOR APPROVAL OF REFUNDS WHEREAS, the City of Orono has always had a policy that all refunds, regardless of dollar value require Council approval prior to refunding the money, and WHEREAS, the City does encounter considerable delay and. aggravation in persons having to wait for such refunds, and WHEREAS, appropriate accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices can be accomplished provided the refunds are appoved by someone outside the Finance Department, and WHEREAS, the City has no ordinances prohibiting it but under Section 18, Second Series, Subdivision 4(G) requires that the Administrator recommend from time to time adoption of such measures for the improvement of administration, and WHEREAS, that same Section under Subdivision 4(H) allows the Administrator to initiate contracts up to $5,000.00 without prior Council approval. NOW, THEKEFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council delegates to the Administrator the authority to approve all refunds of money for services to the City when the City has not rendered any or only a portion of the services for which the monies were paid, subtracting out reasonable ".e for staff time and effort incurred to date. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 23rd day of June, 1986. Mary C. Butler, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy 'M'."Na1 fi n, City _Clerk 1 61286.1 419FETING JUN 2 3 1986 TO: Mayor and City Council .. FROM: Mark Ber.nhardson, City Administrato����%� DATE: June 12, 1986 �JJ SUBJECT: City Council/Strategic Planning When staff presented the work it had done on strategic planning to the Council back in February of 1986 the Council indicated an interest in perhaps doing that at the Council level during the summer. Attached please find a copy of the information that was provided at that time as a means to initiate the discussion. It is suggested that if the Cor,ril would like, an afternoon or evening could be set aside t� pend about 2 to 4 hours reviewing what the Council considers to be the organization's major issues and develop preliminary directions and goals as they relate to those issues. This may well consist of a review of the staff's work together with discussion of the information that led to this development. If you you feel this is still a valid exercise I would be happy to work with you in commencing this process. PROPOSED MOTION - Mov(2d by , seconded by , to direct staff to initiate the City Council'a level strategic planning process during the summer and fall of 1986. Ayes , Nays 11586.2 CITY OF ORONO MISSION STATEMENT OUR MISSION is to provide appropriate services to persons within the community of Orono together with contract communities utilizing available resources in an effective manner accomplished through - A continuous process of objective analysis of past, current, and future trends considering the specific events and unique physical surroundings that shape the mode and structure of, the organization - A positive, forward looking management of personnel and other resources in a business like, customer oriented delivery of services - A select, well trained, expert group of customer oriented employees individually motivated and informed as to their responsibilities together with the organizations overall purpose and direction for delivering a quality product - The aggressive utilization and maintenance of all organizational resources - The contracting of services both in and out, to achieve the appropriate efficiency of service 0 CITY OF ORONO EXTERNAL ANALYSIS - Increased private businesses delivery traditional public services - Selected demands for service increases - Increase communication and information links - Increased duplication of authority in selected areas - Increased development pressure due to transportation link upgrade and saturated second ring development - Fluctuating state and growing metropolitan economies - Pressure for jurisdiction increase by multiplicity agencies (County, LMCD, Metro Council, etc.) INTERNAL ANALYSIS - Expertise in Contracting business both in and out with other entities both public and private -Strong history and orientation of responsive- ness to local citizenry/ - consumers - Need to explore and develop altered delivery systems - Strong environmental commitment - Need to strengthen continuity of staff through training and ongoing information manage- ment system - weed to strengthen the organizational image both inside and outside the organization CITY OF ORONO KEY STRATEGIC ISSUES 1. Ensure appropriate continuity and development of organizational members. 2. Determination of community development direction for the next five years. 3. Appropriate utilization of contracting entities. 4. Provide for the effective marketing and delivery of services. S. Ensure appropriate communications and information provision. 6. Development on an appropriate financial policy. 7. Complete facilities assessment. 11586.1 CITY OF ORONO 1986 STRATEGIC PLANNING KEY ISSUE OBJECTIVES 1. Continuity and Staff Development - Maintain High Level of Continuity - Department Head Teamwork - Selective Hiring/Targeting/Flexibility - High Level of Staff Competency - In House Training - Targeting Development - Overlap/Continuity - Policy oc).ay - Staff - Management Information System 2. Community Development Direction - How should we develop - Change around us - Storm Water Management - Commercial vs. Residential - Navarre - Highway 12 - Rezoning 3. Utilization of Contracting Entities Provider Recipient 4. Police Building/Zoning Utility - Public Works Backup Fire (Polio/Mutual aid) Attorney Engineering Planning Inspection Private Consultant Assessing LOGIS Contractual Service Provision Review - Financial - Legal - Service Capacity - Administration - "ar ket Market/Delivery Anftont i al Administration Assessing Garage Street Maintenance High Level/Service - Realistic/Palatable Cost Market - - Where - Other Communities - Within the Community - Means to Market - Alternative Delivery System - Targeting S. Communication and Information - Effective Delivery/Identity - Type of Information - Required - Compliance (State/Local) - Desired - Media - Cable - Newspaper - Newsietter - Brochure (Parks etc.) - Market - Available - Access - Information and Referral - Image - Means for Current Information KE" SHORT TERM OBJECTIVES (NO ORDER OF PRIORITY) 1. Completion of Facilities Assessment (BernharJson 3/86) 2. Completion of Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plrn (13ernhardson/14abusth 11/16) 3. Completion of Community Development Direction Gcneral - Navarre (Bernhardson/14abiisth/Gerhar0son 6/86) Highway 12 (Bernhardson/t4abusth/Gr-rhardson 5/86) 4. Develop Improved means for Information and Referral (Bernhardson/Mabusth 4/86) 5. Implement Staff Development Teumw ork Program (BernharC-e on/Gerhardson 5/86) 6. Implement Contractual. Service Review (Bernhardson/Department: Heads 8/86) The Strateny Planninn Process t The attached diagram identifies the major component steps of the strategy planning process, and outlines the flow of logic which must underlie the development .of a sound strategic plan. 1. Statement of Company Mission and Objectives The statement of company mission and objectives is the basic starting point for strategic planning. -"e statement of mission - defines the Operating Company's essential nature and character. It describes the Company's role in the Corporation, how it will contribute to the Corporate Strategy, its market position in terms of target customer segments and geographical markets, its major strategic app s to these customers, and its current performance objectives. The statement of mission, in short, defines what `_he • company is now and what 'it is to become. 2. External Analysis The external analysis involves an assessment of major environmental trends and their likely impact on the company's future. This includes an analysis of long term economic trends, consumer market trends, competitive trends, public policy treads, and other key external Iforces impacting on the business. The result of the external analysis is identification of a limited nc,mber (2-4) of key external thr•ea's and opportunities: That is, the one'or two major factors which may threaten the company's future success, and the r one of two major trends which the company might exploit as potential opportunities. 3. Internal Analysis The internal analysis is a situation and trend assessment of the 'company's key pe-l'ormance capabilities and resources. This analysis should include at a minimum an assessment of the company's personnel rces and organizational structure, its physical facilities, its crajor operating policies and procedures, and its financial position \ and p2rformance The internal analysis results in the identification of a limited number (again 2-4) of key internal strengths which can be leveraged, and weaknesses to be corrected. 4. Key Strategic Issues 3y coTl ring the company mi_�Jon and objectives, the external threats and opportunities, and - the internal strengths and wi- nes ses, the key strategic issues facing the company can be identit Thee^ key issues again must be limited in number to only those core issues which will have a major impact on the future of the company. Examples Of 't; strategic "issues might be: New competitive threats against whiCi my is not currently well defended; emerning new market oppo. ` ::; c.s wF ' • a company ei ther i s not currently we" i ti oned or does not eurre. ly have the resources to exploit. These .-,y issues provide the focus and direction for developing sound strategic plans. 5. Strategic Plans Once the kev iiavr been identified sound, action -oriented strategic plans must be .developed which ti•rill resolve 'the issues and help the company fulfill its mission and brcomplish its objectives. I:^dividual strategies may take a'variety of forms reflecting the unique capabilities and resources of indiv'dual companies. In any case, however, the strategies must be a response to the key strategic issues facing the .;ompany. iiiese strategies may involve an aggressive expansion program, they may indicate ( reintensitied merchandising programs to regain a dominant but threatened competitive position, or they may suggest a program of short term retrenchment and internal rebuilding in anticipation of future growth and improved profitability. The critic:'l point is that the strategic plans must be consistent with and be based on the compa,.y mission, its external threats and opportunities, its internal strengths and weakn' ses, and be addressed to the key strategic issues determining the company's future vitality. 6. Tire and Action Schedule and Strategic Objectives Even the most rigorous and well -considered strategic plan will be to no avail unless it is implemented with commitment and precision. Consequently the next step in the plarning process is to develop a realistic but challenging Time and Action Schedul.� for the Execution of the plans. This schedule mould also include a sta t ML nt of specific objectives or ^ilestones for the coming year - control - �- points for monitoring the company's progress. Even though the strategy refl k'ct:; a long run plan, it is still executed in a % series of short run actions. 7. Key Strategic Decisions The final step in the strategic planning process is possibly the most crucial component - identifying and forcing the resolution of the key decisions which have to be made before the plan can be implemented. Most of these decisi•-is are the responsibilities of the Operating Company, but some, most notably those involving major capital expenditures, are dependent on corporate management approval. These decision points must be explicitly identified, and it is encum- bant on corporate management to respond to these points in a direct and timely manner. The results of these decisions can :ien be incor- porated in the Operating Company's financ;al goal planning. I -4•- THE STRATEGY. PLANNING PROCESS EXTERNAL ANALYSIS: KEY THREATS AND OPPORTUNITIES OPERATING CO1;PANIES STATEh1EtIT OF C011PANY MISSION' AND OBJECTIVE INTERNAL ANALYSIS: KEY STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES KEY STRATEGIC ISSUES STRATEGIC PLANS TIME AND ACTION SCHEDULE AND STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES FOR COMING YEAR KEY STRATEGIC DECISIONS CORPORATE 1'J,1IAGE1ILNT 61286.5 TO: Mayor and City Council J UN 2 3 1986 FROM: Mark Bernhrdson, City Administrator p DATE: June 12, )86 SUBJECT: Utility Rate - Bill Payment As you may recall when the approval was given for the rate study back in January of 1986, Pannell Kerr Forster, the City's Auditors were selected for their bid of $2,000.00. The other competing firm for the project was Bonestroo at $2,800.00. The Auditors realized that they would probably expend more money than what they bid but there were some changes in format together with additional alternatives developed that did increase the amount of money and time than they had originally anticipatc,l. As noted in the outline they did end up expending $4,500.00 worth of their time and expenses but based on discussions feel that a $3,000.00 bill would be adaquate compensation for their efforts. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council approve the increase of $2,000 to $3,000 for payment of the utility rate study. This amount was not directly budgeted for 1986 and it is anticipated that with the framework developed by the Auditors the City will now be able to do its own interim rate studies to keep the rates current on an ongoing basis with only review by an outside source every 3 to 5 years. P11OPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by , to accept staf f's recommendation for payment of the bill for the utility rate study to increase from $2,000.00 to $3,000.00 to compensate for the Auditior's additional time and expenditure undertaken for this rate study. Ayes ____, Nays June 9, 1986 Mr. Mark Bernhardson City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Mark: PANNELL KERR FORSTER Certified Public Accountants 410 Park National Bank Bldg 5353 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55416 Telephone (612) 545-0421 This letter is to document our discussion between you, Tom Kuehn, and myself relating to our fees for the 1986 utility ra;,e study which we performed for the City of Orono. I believe that everyone concerned has agreed upon the following fee charges: Fees for basic rate study as per our initial arrangement letter $2,000 Additional fees for modifications and changes requested by City 1,000 Total fees for project $3,000 Normally, minor modifications would not cause fee adjustments. However, the modifications requested by the City including expansion of format presentation, changes in base data, and level of detail has caused our standard fees to exceed $4,5�0 0. We have agreed to absorb the additional overrun. You will, therefore, be receiving a $3,000 bill for the total fees of the project. Please let me know if I have interpreted any of the decisions incorrectly, or if I can be of any further help. Very truly yours, PANNELL KERR FORSTER Kenneth W. Malloy, Partner KWM:cm r JUN 2 3 1986 TO: Mayor and City Council OF FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator`\` DATE: June 18, 1986 SUBJECT: Wayzata Country Club/Luce Line Crossing The Wayzata Country Club currently has two crossing points on the Luce Line to get from the course south of the Luce Line to the course north of it for its golfers to go back and forth. It is attempting now to secure its rights across the Luce Line through a lease agreement with D.N.R. The problem becomes however that in order for the D.N.R. to be able to enter into a lease agreement across it, the municipality or township has to deny the Country Club authority to construct township roads across the Luce Line. This is pretty much a pro forma resolution to do the appropriate denial in order for them to enter into a Lease with D.N.R. It is not anticipated that apart from the lease this will give them any rights or privileges over and above those currently exercised by the Club. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by _ , to adopt Resolution $ to deny availability of township roads to the Wayzata Country Club across the Luce Line. Ayes _, Nays _ WAYNE O. POPHAM ROGER W. SCHNOBRICH DENVER KAUFMAN DAVID S. DOTY ROBERT A.MINISH ROLFE A. WORDEN O. MARC WHITEHEAD BRUCE D. WILLIS FREDERICK S. RICHARDS G. ROBERT JOHNSON GARY R. MACOMBER ROBERT S. BURK HUGH V. PLUNKETT.M FREDERICK C. BROWN THOMAS K. BERG JAMES R. STEILEN JAMES B. LOCKHART ALLEN W. HINDERAKER CLIFFORD M.GREENE POPHAM, HAIK,SCHNOBRICH, KAUFMAN & DOTY, LTD. 4344 IDS CENTER MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE 612-333-4600 D.WILLIAM KAUFMAN MICHAEL O. FREEMAN HOWARD SAM MYERS,U:[ THOMAS C.D'AOUILA LARRY O. ESPEL JANIE S.MAYERON THOMAS J. BARRETT JAMES A. PAYNE DAVID A. JONES LEE E. SHEEHY ALAIN FRECON PATRICIA A. JENSEN LESLIE GILLETTE MICHAEL T. NILAN ROBERT H LYNN THOMAS M. SIPKINS ROBERT C. MOILANEN THOMAS F. NELSON THOMAS J. RADIO Mr. John Gerhardson City of Orono P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 TELECOPIER 612-344-0603 1240 AMHOIST TOWER 345 ST. PETER STREET SAINT PAUL,MINNESCIFA 45102 TELEPHONE G12-3.7,1 -178 SUITE 24r.0 1200 SEVE—Ti :• ;,,i.`(. 7 DENVER, CC,'-- :i0%A50 E1)e232 TELEPHONE 4%03.41iO3 ;!J0, TC�9$7nPIER 303-BC7 -2 S%4 SUIII 1110 sOUlw I!0/ M STREET. N. W WASAINGTON, O. C. 20036 Tr.•.:P"ONE 202-028-5300 TELECOPIER 202-828-5316 C7i"gI:CT DIAL NUMBER 344-054' DAVID L. HASHMALL KATHLEEN M. MARTIN JOHN C.CHILDS DOUGLAS P. SEATON THOMAS E.SANNER BRUCE B. MCPHEETERS GARY O. BLACKFORD SCOTT E. RICHTER GREGORY L.WILMES PAUL J. LINSTROTH SCOTT A. SMITH ELIZABETH A.TH )MPSON KEITH J.HALLELAND MARK B. PETERSON D. RANDALL BOYER BRIAN N. JOHNSON TIMOTHY W. KUCK JULIE A. SWEITZER THOMAS C. MIELENHAUSEN June 17, 1986 Re: Wayzata Country Club Requested Easements Dear John: KATHLEEN A.BLATZ MICHAEL D. CHRISTENSON J. MICHAEL SCHWARTZ L.RAYE M. OSBORNE LOUIS P. SMITH FRANCIS J. CONNOLLY BRUCE H. LITTLE MARK F. PALMA RUSSELLS.PONESSA BRYAN L.CRAWFORO DAVID K. RYDEN OWEN E. HERRNSTAOT MATTHEW E. DAMON 01 COVX•EL FRED L. MORRISON �1@��i`''�n; Enclosed please find a draft of a proposed resolution denying Wayzata County Club's request for easements over the Luce Line Trail. Please review. If you have any questions or changes, please contact me. Very truly yours, N cy E. Husnik L ga Assistant NEH:bjm Enclosure r.c: Mark Bernhardson Kathleen A. Blatz 8463f City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL •s i xA y NO. RESOLUTION 140. A RESOLUTION DENYING THE REQUEST OF THE WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB TO ESTABLISH TOWNSHIP ROADS OVER PORTIONS OF THE LUCE LINE TRAIL. WHEREAS, the '`-�;y Council of the City of Orono has received a request from the Wayzata Country Club to establish two (2) township roads over portions of land known as the Luce Line Trail; and WHEREAS, the two township roads as requested by the Wayzata Country Club are proposed as Parcels A and B and are legally definrd in Hennepin County as: That part of Luce Line Trail; formally known as The Electric Short Line Railway Company, located in .he west half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the east line of said West Half of the Southeast Quarter and the north line of said Luce Line Trail; for bases of bearings, the east line of said West Half of the Southeast Quarter has an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds East; thence westerly 297.50 feet, along a nontangenr_ial curve, along the northerly line of said Luce Line Trail, being a curve concave to the south, having a radius 2907.23 feet and a central angle of 5 degrees 51 minutes 47 seconds, the chord of said curve bears North 83 degrees 05 minutes 58 seconds west to the beginning of land to be described; thence continuing westerly 380.00 feet along said curve concave to the south, having a radius of 2907.23 feet and a central angle of 7 degrees 29 minutes 21 seconds, the chord of said curve bears North 89 degrees 46 minutes 32 seconds West; thence South 86 degrees 42 minutes 37 seconds East, along a nontangential curve, 245.72 feet; thence North 84 degrees 38 minutes 19 seconds cast 135.00 feet to the point of beginning. That part of Luce Linu Trail, formally known as The Electric Short Line Railway Company, located in the West half of the southeast Quarter of Section 36, City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL .Town hip a, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the east line of said West Half of the Southeast Quarter and the south line of said Luce Line Trail; for bases of bearings the east line of said West Half of the Southeast Quarter has an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds East; thence westerly 82.50 feet not tangent to last described curve, along the southerly line of said Luce Line Trail, being a curve concave to the south, having a radius of 2807.23 feet and a central angle of 1 degree 41 minutes 02 seconds, the chord of said curve bears North 80 degrees 39 minutes 09 seconds West to the beginning of land to be described; thence continuing westerly 380.00 feet along said curve concave to the south, having a radius of 2807.23 feet and a central angle cf 7 degrees 45 minutes 21 seconds, the chord of saki cu,-,e bears North 85 degrees 22 minutes 21 seconds West; thence North 69 degrees 13 minutes 47 seconds East, along a nontangential curve, 57.71 feet; thence North 89 degrees 00 minutes 07 seconds East 80.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 53 minutes 01 seconds East 250.09 feet to the point of beginning; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono does not have fee title to parcels A and B as described above; and WHEREAS, alternative placement for roadway crossings over property other than the Lure Line Trail is not feasible. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT the City Council of the City of Orono does hereby resolve to deny the request of Wayzata Country Club to establish township roads over portions of the Luce Line Trail. Dated this day of _, 1986. mayor Attest: City Clerk 8440f �r .iUN 2 3 1�4?; To: Mark Bernhardc- , City Administrator From: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director Date: J ne 17, 1986 Subject: Navarre Bayshire Park Expenditures Recently the park area in the Bayshire subdivision (Navarre Drive Inn Theatre Development) has been graded, top soil placed and seeded. Due to the financial difficultys of the subdivision the park area did not have the rest area benches installed. I have received an estimate for installation of three park benches for that area as per the attached sketch. 3 Benches @ $289.66 = $868.98 Labor to install $315.00 Concrete slab at each ben^h $812.50 It is my recommendation to proceed with the installation of the park benches at a cost not to QXceed $1,996.48 and to pay Zor the expenditures from the Park De-'- 'on Fund. TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Admin:.stratV Forwarded recommending approval. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by to accep, taff's recommendation to improve Bayshire Park at a cost not to exceed $1,996.48 and to pay for the expenditures from the Park Dedication Fund. Ayes Nays __ PRO Po SCD PAR I< C 14ANG6- �FROM k#0016 T'AOQK )7'• A Noocc CAsuotL CrierrN 040fr^ ?Ank. No Fw4 cE . 3, A+tIFA w"<< 06 S000tb. o R L, o ku M4 / IV % ,���l�C,� S N?s� s; Opp -►.( �;ENCNES ON cepgc'yT SL449 Cz r ��aiu E AVENUG' 61286.8 P `1 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Ni:,rk Bernhardson, City n�jministratorh' DATE: , ne 12, 1986 DATE: Highk - 2 Corridor Study MEETING TUESDAY, JULY P, 1986 7:30 P.K. ORONO HIGH SCHOOL AUDITORIUM FFTING .i U 2 3 19$6 following our June 3, 1986 tour and discussion at the Council Chambers with staff and the ronsul� . to ptovide tt- information and outlines requested togeth . v° th - I lowing Coun— 1 and Planning Commission to hav? further discussion to fir. a.' plan for Iiighway 12. Should ,(, ha)c any further questions _r comm it-, pl-:ase feel free to co `ac me. �,OPOSED MOTION - Moved t, s. ­)nled by , to acknowledge e,%riblishment of July 8, 196a as .'.ext meeting fcr the Tway 12 Corridor Study. Ayes �vs 61286.6 TO: Mayor and City Council � J(JN 2 3 �a�6 FROM: Mark Bernhard son, City Administratc'�L\b ,;t .,. ,n DATE: June 12, 1986 SUBJECT: Port Time Liquor In the last two months we have h,11 two part timers Connie 1!anuel and Rirk Sievers resign from part time employment at the liquor store. There is need for a replacement and request that Council confirm appointment of Cris Fink who has had experience in the retailing area, although not in the liquor area. "'tarf would like to start this individual at $4.75 an hour with free month r- iew. PROPOSED 1,.JTTON - Move-1 by , seconded by `, at hiring of Cris Fink as a part time retail liquor c '..75 per hour. Ayes __, Nays J U N 2 3 19n6 To: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator From: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator Date: June 17, 1986 Subject: Temporal Employment - Orono Golf Course It has been determined that on busy week -ends at the golf course, it is necessary to have a "starter" to keep order and efficiency. A starter will be or, call to be available when needed. We are estimating 4-6 hours per weekend. Therefore, it is my recommendation to employ Mr. Richard Nelson, 21600 Oineview Court, Greenwood, Minnesota, as a temporary p -)yee "starter" at an hourly rate of $4.25, effective ab of June 21, 1986. TO: Mayor and City Council �J FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator "k Forwarded recommending approval ''rom June 21, 1986 to S' mber 1, 1986. PROPOSED MOTION loved by seconded by _ to accept staff's recor..- ndation tc. .iire Richard Nelson for temporary employment at the Orono Golf Course at an hourly rate of $4.25 effective June 21, 1986 to September 1, 1986. Ayes _, Nays 61286.7 0Uh1t:':11! A19-fING TO: yor and City Council r` 11\\ SUN 23 j�86 FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato►�0v 1 -,R.; C,y Y ,� OFj'gErF"�9 DATE: June 12, 1986 SUBJECT: Brian Clark Police Officer Resignation As noted in the attached letter Brian Clerk commenced employment with us January 1, 1986, has taken employment with the Shakopee Police Department. While he has enjoyed his work here in Orono, Shakopee is his home town and has been very familiar with that Police Department for a number of years. RECOMMENDATION_ - Staff would recommend acceptance of the resignation and undertake the process to replace Mr. Clark. In addition it is anticipated that at a point in the process of Assistant Chief selection it will be determined if there are qualified in-house candidates to fill one, if not two Assistant Chief slots. If. so a new patrol officer will be needed to bring the department up to strength in the mid to late July time frame. Staff will bring back names of persons who they would like to hire at the appropriate time. PROPOSED MO'iION - Moved by , seconded by , to accept the resignation of Brian Clark and direct staff to undertake selection process for a new patrol officer for his replacement together with the availibility of a list for appointment of a patrol officer to bring the department up to strength in line with the Assistant Chief's process. Ayes _, Nay-- — Prepare 3 conies NAME OF Ei IPLOYEE Department VILLAGE OF ORONO, !INNESOTA STATEi IEUT OF RESIGNATION Irian Patrick Clark Salary Rate Police Departr.,ent Statement of ,signation: POSITION TITLE Full Time _ Part Time I request that this resignat�on,be accepted by the Village Council to become effective on �:.Lg� w,�ic;i is the last day of actual servic —.7--T-am requesting com?e::sation for personal service to the Village in the above indicated position for accrued annual leave du for days. The reason for this resignation is as follows: L(—,vinc, to work at a department closer to home. Date: 6/15/86 (Employee's Signature) Recommendaticn of Department head: I would (-() would not ( Tais position may not be ) re -Hire this employee. refilled until Date: _ � ����t�-.. /t &a,641 epartmentHea Certification of Accrued Leave: Payment for ----days accrued �eavc upon employee's termination on_ is hereby authorized. Date: _ - — -- 1 age 7C'dm1-'n s ra or JUIN 2 3 1186 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: M- : Bernhardson, City Administrato C=it? !':af DATE: June 18, 1986 SUBJECT: Administrator's Information DAKOTA RAIL - As you may have possibly noticed Dakota Rail has recently received a number of used dining cars and currently the former owners of the Surfside in Mound are currently working to refurbish the cars. It is anticipated by them that durir.j the mid to late July time frame that they may be able to operate their dining cars on Dakota Rail from Hutchinson to either Spring Park or Wayzata depending on what kind of cooperation Dakota Rail receives for Burlington Northern as their line stops about a mile short of the Wayzata depot. It is anticipated that this will run on a six to seven day a week basis in the evenings. The City will monitor developments as they go along. NAVARRE REDEVELOPMENT - A meeting was held with the Executive Director of the Westonka Chamber together with two of the interested business people from the Navarre area regarding initial meetings on Navarre Redevelopment. During the discussion a number of issues were raised including safety, County 15 development, phasing and access; problems of the business area being segmented off by County Road 15 and roads in the area, the level of interest of the building owners, the viabil..y and affordability of new space of existing tenents etc. As it was felt that the business and building owners may not attend the meeting strictly t(, discuss redevelopment together with the fact that it is difficult to get many of the people together during t-he summer, it was decided that a meeting would be set up with the people from Hennepin County to discuss County Road 15, its phasing and additional ac ,ss questions, businesses etc. together with lead in discussion on redevelopment in the Navarre area in mid to late September. While this delays initiation of the process, it was felt that this is better than meetings curing the summer which may be poorly attended and which may cause a feeling false starts and frustration. S_TUBBS BAY - Mike Gaffron, on a time available basis, has been working on the project, however it has not gone as quickly as anticipated, but it is hoped that it will be brought back in the August time frame. He has spent a considerable amount of time going through each of the properties and coming up with recommendations, however he has not been able to sit down and put together a report as of yet. As you wi 11 recall this remains the final significant area on tic lake that has dense development that remains unsewered. AdJitionally there have been inquiries from the area residents regarding improvements to the property, people are wanting to know what direction they can go as it relates to septic/sewer and other improvements and land use changes. LOWELL'S AUTO PARTS - As you may of noticed Lowell Zitzloff has finaflyin tii ated construction on the site next to his auto parts store for which he was given approval last fc-_1. Foundations are currently being laid and it is anticipated construction will be completed by this fall. CHICKEN JOINT - By lack of activity there has not been any improvement to the old gas station on the Keaveny property. Staff has made attempts to get into contact John Lambin to determine the status of the project, however these have been unsuccessful. Staff will continue to determine the status as it may well be appropriate for the City to initiate appropriate action on a hazardous building proceedings. FACILITIES ASSESSMENT - Staff has done further exploratory work regarding at least one site together with preliminary discussions with the architect from Bonestroo regardiri the information that would be needed to estimate the cost of an approximate new facility. Additionally staff is working to develop a financing plan which in the next few weeks will i:e discussed with the City's Financial Consultant and Auditor. COMPARABLE WORTH - The City did rece've the results of its comparable worth study approximately two weeks ago. However those results did con'�ain some errors which would have been hard to detect prior to the results being put forward. As such some of the positions are being revaluated by the Department Heads and amendments will be sent in on these. Once the revised information and point spread is brought back we then will work to develop its plan for comparable worth. FM_ULMER PROPERTY - The City has continued to work through its etro Waste Control representative, JoEllen Burr, to see if there are any available avenues short of going through a Comprehensive Plan ammendment to allow for hookup of the Brian Fulmer property to the interceptor line. Initial reaction was not positive, however additional research is being done and it is hoped that at the July meeting the City will be able to initiate whatever additional action it needs to get this accomplished. LIST OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR MEETING OF June 23, 1986 Off Sale License - Don Scherven On sale License Navarre Lanes Setup License 3421 Shoreline Drive Club Liquor License - Wayzata Country Club Sunday Liquor License - 200 Wayzata Boulevard Septic System Installers - Clover Hill Company •Inc Box 69 Hamel, MN 553- O Westonka Sewer & Water 6501 County Road 15 Mound, MN 55364 Solicitors License cense - Dis,---)uit Flowers e1i cut flowers & balloons Off sale beer - King-s Super Value Robert F. King 3333 Shoreline Drive .u,( „3 1 A A4.0 TO• i,,ayor and City Council FROM: Mel Kilbo, Police Chief DATE: June 19, 1986 SUBJECT: Don Scherven & Wayzata Country Club Liquor License Renewal The Police Department have checked the files and find no liquor violations. I mmend renewal of 1?.censes. t T CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 660Crysta 3ay, Mt -nesota 55323•Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY -n accordance with t-].S. 15.165, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential inform- ation. You are notified that. 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with ether local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary t- process the permit or license. 4. if ycur requested permit or license reqires council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certian rights under M.S. i5.165 to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full. name, and date of birth are required to process this application or permit. First Midd a Aas t Address D of firth Phon I un s an my -ights as stated above. !S rInatu BUILDING & ZO IN ' •735 ADMINIs,rRATI0V_"INANCf. - 473.7.158 • PUBI R N'()kKS - 473-7359 t + ASSESSING �J: NOTICE "urs-dant to Laws of Minnesota, 1984, Chapter 502, Article 8, Section (270.72) (Tax Clearance; Issuance of Licenses), the licensing authority is required to provide to the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue your Minnesota business tax identification num- ber and the social security number of each . sense applicant. Under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and the Federal Privacy Act of 1974, we are required to advise you of the following regarding the use of this infor- mation: 1. This informatiun may be used to deny the issuu,ice or renewal of your license in the event you owe Minnesota sales, employer's withholding or motor vehicle excise taxes; 2. Upon receiving this information, the ', sensing authority will suff y ,t only to the Minnesota Department of Re enue. However, under the dpral Exchange of Information Agreement the Department of Rever, ay supply this information to the Internal Revenue Service; 3. FAILURE TO SUPPLY THIS INFOI.MATION MAY JEOPARDIZE OR DELAY THE PROCESSING OF YOUR LICENSE ISSUANCE OR RENEWAL APPLICATION. Please supply the following information and return u1c.. with your application to the licensing authority. Applicant's Last Name Fir: Name/ Middle Initi /V1e Applicant's Audress City, State, Zip Code rS 36 �f •Applicant's Social Security No. Position (Officer, FVtner, etc. -372-7 Business P; -re ` usiness Address City, State, Zip Code Minr,esota Tax Identification r,umt er S INSURANCE BINDER 91nde1 No. THIS BINDER IS A TEMPORARY INSURANCE CO. 'RACT, SUBJECT NAVi rn_ 1 G TO THE CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS FORM. NAME AND ADDRESS OF AGENCY COMPANY U, G O R D p N G A I N E S RAM INSURANCE AGENCY I SUITE #201 Eftectivel2'01"A m A 113 7 19 8:, Pc WAYZA f A E:1' Expires 12.01 am A%i. 7 19 86 M i. v E A P O L I S MN J: 5 4 2 6 I � This binder is issued to extend _ovzrage In tF above nam■�d company per eyplring policy q (c■clpl as ra1cA brow � NAME AND MAILING ADDkE' S OF INSURED Description of Operation/Vehicles/Props is FIRE $1650( .ONTENTS hi)vi ANES INC. L_IAE:I1.ITY BO,,.ING LANE' 3421 1L INE D ' NAVARRE MINN 5539�' Type and Location of Property Coverage/Perils/Forms IAmt of Insurance Ded. caINS % R F'rOPerty is nornially loczited at O the .above :address e:accl- t, :as rtotird. � P Cored enter 16.d►000 ;I?U E R T i Y r Type o. ouranc- Coverage/Forms Limits of 'Jabili L _ — — — EacV -urrence Aggregate AScheduled Form lr_�Compr �nsive _- _ fo,In Bodily Injury $ $ B Pre mla?s/OpCrations Products/Con ,eted Operations �. •operty Image L T Contrar, ual Other (spocity below' _�3 —, (Bodily Injury 4 Property Damage Med Pay $ -' I •, I C m inert 10 Y Persona :_,ry ae,•x —. ,ar I[]A B C�lC Pe. 1a1 Injury �. imits of L._hilit ram_ U l'ability in w.,ed Hired B:)dlty Injury (E r '3orson) $ T I Comprehensive Deductible 18odily Injury (Eal_ dent) $ 0 1 Collision Deductible O Medical Payments $ I Property Damage $ BHNo Uninsured Motorist $ Fault (specit; (Bodily Injury & Property Danlage L . `ther (speuty). E'_ : ^nbmed $ Q1k:^RKFRS' COMPENSA'IStatutory Limits � ,specify slates t:eiow, J, .APLUYERS LIA51Li, emit $ SPECIAL CvfiDITIONS/OTHER rOVERA"ES $100(: RINEC :>INC1_E ; :MIT '_1A':1l' Y La",(�� 1i antt� � seta t� t� NAME AND ADDRESS Or;-,Mn° #4GEE t OSS I arf E F "I 111 -RED u J D(.-R' TOY M. C I 1 .' OF 0r; FORT ►rIr. I.CE CRYSTI L'AY Hhl.t-1N CITY 10 (:FIX :16 MIN'1. �,'3 C L Fi'r. i �.Iljo6iIure of Authurtrr' Repre a it eve Oa' F N N K. C,' `1,50P 9 r GAM 7S I11• �/1 Na. V3!% —ataM rern 1H. --___ - ..- - - - OFF SALE $ 25.00 ON SALE 75.00 STATE OF SETUP 100.00 Combination Application for To th MINNF.SOTA Retailer's (On -sale) Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor License /4.,d Af6 Miller-Da0i Co.. Minneapolis. Minn. 717_7_ 0 � _ -sale) JUN17PA i.AM of licensing authority (toanty) (tier) (village) ' County of A/ ti 1. �� / rSC l / )_ (' l - 4-1 of the city, village, or !o,,,n of /t�1 r) iJ4- NJ , county of r �N 4" , State of .1linresota, hereby make application for a l:etaticr's (On -sale) (Off -sale) Non-intoxicatinj Malt Liquor License to sell such .Malt liquor under and pursuant to an ordinance (resolution) passed by city, nillaec ,-ounril, counttl board of — and. Lnapler NO, X..,ne-sota Statutes 1945, as amended, providing for licenelnj and regulating the tale of non -intoxicating malt liquor. During the past five cars my residence has bean as follows: nr IV S�'� r_ ;'L) y?s , zW, �! s I was horn ,. Mot!• Day Year city Village /'"' / e/ 4-1 Town am" or CeOatn I ant a (native)- naturalized) citizen of the. United States. 1 ant _ 77tarried..11y (wife's) (husband'.$) name and address is I ant, proprietor. &Z=7, X.-,Ot ZG S Firm was incorporated:. f r%& the state Corporation is gu/t r% to da tea to .�ttnn �• a. License is for_L_P/ l ��J` e� �� &Lt (street) (htjhuny) located as follow: The license trill be in connection with. Yc7 u-) 4- ti L Drop itarot Cafe, aoeMete" ND04 CIA which has been in operation__ ntha Years .I p The establishnient is located on the e� /� L u floor. The business premises are owned by The taxes at the propert are not lingtunt. I and 7—engag 2n the retail sale of intoxicating liquor. I have 1 had an application for license rejected as follows: I have never been convicted of a felony nor of violating any Xat? h • ' or state liquor law or looal ordinance relating to the mantifaeturs, sale or transportation, or pow,:Lw,n f_ . sale or transportation of ,.ntoxt ating liquor. Gantbling or fambling devires will not be perm,ittcd on the liccmged premised. 1 am the owner of the leasehold, furniture, f xtitres, and equipment in the preyrism for which Ww l icense is a ppl ie(l, exec pt_.._ ____— I have no intention or agreement to transfer the licengo to another person. I submit the following names of pcisons, includinn a bank, for reference, with whom I have had Wainesa relations as follows_: 1- - A ' t l`' �' '` T intend to engage in tho sale of intoxienting liquor and will have a Federal Occupational Tax Receipt in accordance with the ordinance governing this lieense. My Federal Tax Stnmr Receipt is No I will comply strictly with the provisions of the ordinance rclatnig to tho sale of soft drinks for "mixing" pl,rposes and will serve patrons in full view of the public. I at,-res to waive my Constitutional Bights against search and seizure and will freely permit peace officers to inspect my premises and al-ree to the forfeiture of my license if found to have viulated tlo provisions of the ordinance (resolution? providing for the granting of this license. I hereby solemnly swear that the foregoing statements are true and corn to, tote beet of my knowledge and that I agree to comply with all the provisions of the ordinance under whi thia lice n is anted. f 9ub►_eribed and sworn to before me t.hi.i_.-___.l b t6 96 t c j day - _- NOT11i Lkeoke mop be Issued only to tt/twea who are eldwta of the i.i Rtat.r and who or* of u"' moral cheraeter aed aeyete, wbo bow* ottalnrl tho ass A 1 91 rears and Who at* pn)Prletora of the wtablleha,eaU tor •►Ira tb* IlAnees are lae. vl. Law 1949. a. ToO. WAITER K. JARL Notary PubMt:. Hennepin County. MV"6 my E .Plies .1sn: I`'), 19 i MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY PHONE 612-296 6159 LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION 333 SIBLEY • ST. PAUL, MIy 55101 APPLICATION FOR CONSUMPTION AND DISPLA`! (SET-UP) PERMIT PERMIT FEE $151.50 r` 5598 Don Scherven Corp. Navarre Lanes Co Rds 15/19, Box 51 Navarre, MN 55392 IF NAME AND ADDRESS SHOWN ARE NOT CORRECT, MAKE CHANGES IN SPACES BELOW NOTE: ALL'ON-SALE' INTOXICATING LIQUOFl LICENSEE'S ARE EXEMPT FROM Ar VILYING. ,,pPtt,ants Narne (Elustnatt, Parenershlp, Corporation) -- - ------ Trade Name or OBA -- -- -- -- Liuslness Street Address of Box Numbor County ----� Business Phone .ty St ZIP Code -i f� Ceti /Z— F RMIT T' Type of Buflness (Restaurant, (lance Hall, etc.) ❑Private Club �ZPU bllc Business / Name of Business or Club `Manager f A ddress of /Manager Q 'Jayne u Building Owner _ s o1 Owner SEPARATEARE THE OR BUSINESS PREMISES 1� ANY Wtt_ NON-INTOXICATINGAL LIQUOR LICENSEI u OTHER BUSINESS ESTPBUSHMENT? f TO THIS BUSINESS FOR THIS LOCATION+ /T�� �Ves C_;No YJYes .^No iS APPLICATION IF TRANSFER, FURME R L1r.ENSEE.S NAME ANO HUSINESS TRADE NAME ORIGINAL l__1 PEN. 1 RANSFr.R FOR A PUBLIC BUSINESS If a Partnersh,p, State th. Name anti a of Each Partner It a Corpo,at.nn State the Name and Address of Each Oti!cer H.fsmess fart ner;011lear Address 4/ ! 5— J /i 'l/F'OF ^ L' c► tl�'/� Business artnar/Of lcer I Address BusinessPartner/Officer FQs A PRIVATE CLUB Data Club 0,yanizeci Number of Members Amount of Dues Imembership Reuulrements f . rnyrn or r.me LAUD Is Club Sulldrng Dues Clu✓ Maintain Lockers 4l Present Location: Owned or Rented? For 1laambart To Store Liquor? [fives ❑Mo u u cer/ e: Nam e ae Adtlress l L_. Club 01ficariClim,t rr Name Address Club Officer/Director Name Address Has applicant; if partnership, any partner; if corporation, any officer or director; if club, any club officer or director, ever ;iad a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked or suspended or been convicted for any violation of State ;.aws or local ordinances.- if soive date and details - N / 1; �, If a Partnership, State the Name and A­d•r-s of Each Partner: If a Corporation, State the Name and Address of Each Officer. Business artner/Officer Address business artner/Officer Address Business artner/Officer Address Fna A PRIVATE CLUB Date Club Organized Number of Members Amount of Dues Membership Requirements 5691h Of me Club Is Club Building Does Club Maintain Lockers At Present Location: Owned or Nented? For Members To Store Liquor? �res ❑No Club cer re: or Name Address Club Officer/Dirocl�r Name Address Club Officer/Director Name Address Has applicant; if partnership, any partner; if corporation, any officer or director; if club, any club officer or director, ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revokgd� or suspended or been convicted for any violation of State Laws or local ordinances; if so�give date and details I hereby certify that the answers are true of my own knowledge and understand that the givin of false f rm ion or the failure to give pertinent info. -motion -onstitutes cause for revocation of this permit. ANY PERMIT ISSUED HEREUNDER DO T At O SALE OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR. NO CONSIDERATION WILL BE GIVEN TO THIS APPLICATION UNLESS APPROVED AS PROVIDED / 1 BELOW:if IF THE BUSINESS IS LOCATED IN A COUNTY: ignature — thorired Applicant Date IF A C UB AT A COPY OF THE CONSTITUTION AND BYLAWS OF THE CLUB AND A CURRENT LIST OFMEMBERS. ADproved — Chairperson County Board or Representative Date IF THE BUSINESS IS LOCATED IN A MUNICIPALITY CASH Approved — Council President or Representative Date CHECK PS 9007 c3.196l CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66aCrystal Bay. Minnesota WZ3 0 Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with M.S. 15.165, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential inform- ation. You are r,.,tified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If :-our requested permit or license reqires council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have tertian rights under M.S. 15.165 to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full. name, and date of birth are required to process this application or permit. nl-in n 1 exander Downey — First Middle Last 745 Lincoln Avenue - Address 9-17-43 Date of birth 612 291 1406 Phone I ..gin ors and rights as stated above. X i ature BUILDING A 7ONIN - 473.7357 • )MI IS A77ON A FINANCE -- 473.7338 • PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 ASSESSING MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION 333 SIBLEY is ST. PAUL, MN 55101 PHONE (612) 296-6159 APPLICATION FOR CLUB ON SALE RETAIL LIQUOR LICENSE This application shall be completed by an officer of the club seeking a license. The application must be filed with the City Clerk or the County Auditor together with the Bond Forms and the Proof of Liquor Liability Insurance as required by statute. To qualify for a license a club must have at least fifty mem- bers, been in continuous existence for at least three years, have an elected governing board and limit sales to members and bona fide guests only. The annual license fee is set by statute (M.S. 340A.408). Granting of a license by the city or county is discretionary. If this is a first application, attach a copy of the Articles of Incorporation or Charter. TYPE OR PRINT Corporation Name _ Club Trade Name or DBA Wayzata Country Club Wayzata Country Club License Location (Street Address) License Period Business Phone 200 Wayzata Blvd. From 7-1-86 166-30-87 (121473 8846 Municipality County State Zip Code Orono Hennepin Mn. 55391 Building Owner's Name Building Owner's Address Wayzata Country Club 200 Wayzata Blvd. Club Manager's Name Are there any delinquent :_1 Yes )(X)Vo John A. Downey taxes on the property? Name of Member of Managing Board Address See attached listing Name of Member of Managing Board Address Name of Member of Managing Board Address Name of Member of Managing Board Address Name of Bonding Company — - Amount of Bond AID Insurance Company 3t,000 Name of Liquor Liability Company — -- - Amount of lnswance St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company Give Date of Club Charter Date of Incorporation T Number of Years of if Veterans or Fraternal Continuous Existence Organization _ July 30, 1956 _ of the Club_ _ 29 Number of Years in Number of Club Will the Club be Current Quarters Members Issued a Charitable ❑ Yes �b `n 524 Gambling License? _^ 'K vo,a n ae 1. Are any members, officers, agents or employees paid profits from the sale of beverages to club members? No 2. Are any employees paid salaries? _Mess 3. Has this club or any employee been convicted of a violation of Federal or State law or local ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages? fdo If so, give names, dates and violations 4. Does any wholesaler or manufacturer of alcoholic beverages own or have any interest in furniture, fixtures or equipment for the licensed premises?-�__- If so, give details -- - _---- -- --- ---- --- -- ----------- --- 5. During the past license year has a Summons been issued under the LiL;.for Civil Liability Law (Dram Shop) M.S. 340A.8027 . Yes ,;.No If yes, attach a copy of the Summons. I certify that I ha e r ad�the�ove questions and that the answers are true and correct cf my own knowledge. _ S tt)re of Applicant ate REPORT BY POLIC4 DEPARTMENT OR SHERIFF'S OFFICE This is to certify that the applicant, and the associates, named herein have not been convicted within the past five years for any violation of Laws of *.he State of Minnesota, or Municipal Ordinances relating to Intoxicating Liquor, except as foliows__— Police Department or Shentt's N :me s License Granted License Denied_ _ I C. Title Spnature LICENSE APPROVAL OR DENIAL 19 License Expires 19 19 WAYZATA, MN 55391 18000 BREEZY POINT ROAD WAYZATA, MN 55391 MARVIN E. SEIBOLD 1699 NORTH FARM ROAD LONG LAKE, MN 55356 MR. C. WAYNE LE NEAVE 360 WAKEFIELD ROAD WAYZATA, MN 55391 DONALD W. ADAMS 18425 - 5TH AVE. NO. PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 MR. CARSON D. HERRON 108 CHEVY CHASE DRIVE WAYZATA, MN 55391 MR. DONALD A. HENN I NGS 18220 COUNTY ROAD 6 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 MR. JOHN B. FERRIS 1265 OAKVIEW ROAD LONG LAKE, MN 55356 MR. JOHN J FORD 1115 VAGABOND LANE PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 I4EWITT A. SCHOONOVER 4809 ASPASIA LANE EDINA, MN 55435 MR. DON C BICE 498 BOVEY ROAD WAYZATA, MN MR. ROBERT J. JOHNSON 5032 CROWN STREET MINNETONKA, MN 55343 DAV I D C. GRAY 3901 HILLCREST WAY DEEPHAVEN, MN 55391 BENJAMIN C. FROTHINGHAM 2765 EVEREST LANE PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 MR. RONALD MASON 28115 WOODSIDE ROAD SHOREWOOD, MN 55331 DR. GARY L. CARLSON 14180 STONEGATE LANE MINNETONKA, MN 55343 ROBERT V. HOVELSON 14800 MINNEHAHA PLACE WAYZATA, MN 55391 PAUL BASZUCKI 250 WAKEFIELD ROAD WAYZATA, MN 55391 MR. PATRICK J. MURRAY 3831 BASSETT CREEK DR., MPL.S. , MN 55422 JAMES T. HEWITT 211 NORTHGATE ROAD 55391 WAYZATA, MN 55391 C PAUL. LINDHOLM 4792 PERKINSVILLE ROAD BOX 7 MAPLE PLAIN. MN `ri35� GENE A BIER -1020 HOLLY LANE PLYMOUTH, MN NOTICE. Pursuant to Laws of Minnesota, 1984, Chapter 502, Article 8, Section 2 (270.72) (Tax Clearance; Issuance of Licenses), the licensing authority is required to provide to the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue your Minnesota business tax identification num- ber and the social security number of each license applicant. Under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and the Federal Privacy Act of 1974, we are required to advise you of the following regarding the use of this infor- mation: 1. This information may be used to deny the issuance or renewal of your license in the event you owe Minnesota sales, employer's withholding or motor vehicle excise taxes; 2. Upon receiving this information, the licensing authority will supply it only to the Minnesota Department of Revenue. However, under the Federal Exchange of Information Agreement the Department of Revenue may supply this information to the Internal Revenue Service; 3. FAILURE TO SUPPLY THIS INFORMATION MAY JEOPARDIZE OR DELAY THE PROCESSING OF YOUR LICENSE ISSUANCE OR RENEWAL APPLICt, "ION. Please supply the following information and return along with your application to the licensing authority. Applicant's Last Name First Name Middle Initial Wayzata C,­intry Club pplicant's Address City, State, Zip Code 200 Wayzata Blvd Wayzata, Mn. 55391 Applicant's 'ocial Security No, Position Officer, Partner, etc. Business 'game Wayzata Country Club Business Address City, State, Zip Code 200 Wayzata Blvd Wayzata, Mn. 55391 Minnesota Tax Identification Number R5375R6 i 17-6 Sign ajy��7�B � �E/� Fete �,, w PRODUCER WAYZATA INSURANCE AGENCY 305 East Lake Street Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 INSURED WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB P. 0. Box 151 Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 ISSUE DATE (MM j 12-27-51 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTE►+ OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS J NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDEN. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE CLETTER OMPANY A St. Paul Insurance Company COMPANY LETTER S COMPANY --- ---- -- LETTER C COMPANY D - -- LETTER COMPANY E LETTER THIS IS TO CERTIFY T-1AT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY RE _ UIREMCNT, TERM OR CONMTION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFOPDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDI- TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. TYPE OF iN,'_R;,'ICE I POLICY NUMBER GENERAL LIABILITY COMPREHENSIVE FORM PREMISES/OPERATIONS UNDERGROUND EXPLOSION d COLLAPSE HAZARD PRODUCTSICOMPLETED OPERATIONS CONTRACTUAL INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE PERSONAL INJURY AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO %LL OWNED AUTOS IPRIV PASS I ALL OWNED AUTOS ( TH RPT4 $N) PRIHIPED AUTOS NON -OWNED AiJTOS GARAGE LIABIITY EXCESS LIABILITY UMBRELLA FCRIA OTu:R THA': UYRG`:'_;, FF q.• WORKERS COMPENSAT':)N AND EMPLOYERS' LIASI! ITY POLICY EFIECttVE I POLICY EICPIR4r,iN LIABILITY LIMITS IN THOUSANDS DATE (MMS:WY) DATE JMM001YI jarAGGREGATE OTHER T Sic � 1, .,v A LIQUOR LIABILITY To Be Assigned x-1-f,6 1-1-87 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLESISPECIAL ITEMS BODILY I I $ INJURY DAMAGE PROPERTY I I $ BI & PO COMBINED $ I PERSONAL INJURY 1 $ emtykAP $ IDEA PERSONI nky km AXCW $ PROPERTY DAMAGE $ COMBINED $ C�NEDI $ Is STATUTORY $ (EACH ACCIDENT) (DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT) $ (DISEASE -EACH FMPLOYEEI 100,000 B.I. Perso 200,000 B.I. Accid $300,000 AGGREGATE SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EX- CITT OF ORONO PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO Box 66 MAIL 10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIA9& ITY Crystal Bay, M i n n e s o t a 55323 OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, FI S AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES AUTHORIZED REPFjf;-dNTATIVE �' Power of Attorney Insurance AID Insurance Company (Mutual) Des Moines, Iowa 50304 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS That AID Insurance Company (Mutual), a corporation organized under the laws of the Slate of Iowa. with Its principal office in the City of Des Moines, Iowa, hereinafter tailed "Company", does hereby make. constitute and appoint — — Paul H. Strayer, S.A.Denning, Mark A. Stubbs, Des Moines, Iowa -- each in his Individual capacity. Its true and lawful Attorney -In -Fact with full power and authority to sign. seal, and execlitP in its behalf any and all bonds and undertakings and other obligatory instruments of similar nature (except bonds guaranteeing the payment of principal and interest of notes, mortgage bonds and mortgages) in penalties not exceeding the sum of UNLIMITEDIN AMOUNT----------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- (S UNLIMITED and to bind the Company thereby. as futiy and to the same extent as if such instruments were signed by the duly authorized officers of the Company; and all arts of said Attorney pursuant to the authority hereby given are hereby ratified and confirmed. This Powe• of Altornev fs made and executed pursuant to and by authority of the following By -Laws duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company. ARTICLE IX — EXECUTION OF CONTRACTS Section 2. Bonds. undertakings. and other obiigatory instruments of similar nature, other than policies and endorsements, issued by the Corporation snail be validly executed and binding on the Corporation when signed by the President, or a Vice President, or by Attorneylsi•1n- Fact appointed by the President, or by a Vice President.' Section 3 The President. or a Vice President, shall have the power to appoint agents of the Corporation, or other persons, as Attorney(s;- In-Fact to act an behalf of the Corporation in the execution of bonds. undertakings. and other obligatory instruments of similar nature other man policies and endorsements with lull power to bind the Corporation by their signature and execution of any such instrument The appoint- T ent of such Attorneyls)-In-F3ct snail be accomplished by Powers of Attorney signed b•I the President. or the Vice President. This Power of Attorney is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the following By -Laws duly adopted by the Board of Directcrs of the Company. ARTICLE IX — EXECUTION OF CONTRACTS Section 4 Tie Secretary. or a. Assistant Secretary, is authorted to certify that any such Power of Attorney so signed small be vaiidfy executed and binding on the Corcoration: and to certify that any bond, undertaking, or obligatory instrument of similar nature. other than policies and endorsements. to which this Power of Attorney is attached is and shall continue to be a valid and binding obligation of the Corporation. accorainq to its terms. when executed by Atto�ney(sl•In-Fact appointed by the President or a Vice President." Section 5 it shall not be necessary to the valid execution and binding effect an the Corporation of any bond. undertaking, or obligatory instrument of similar nature. other than policies and endorsements. signed on benalf of the Corporation by the President. or a Vice President. jr Attornevisi-In-Fact appointed by the President. or a Vice President. or any Power of Attorney executed on behalf of the Corporation appoint- rg Attorney isi-in-Fact ,n act for the Corporation. or of any certificate to be executed by the Secretary, or an Assistant Secretary. as nereinabove in Section 2. 3. and 4 Of this Article provided. that the corporate seal be affixed to any such instrument but the person autho.iZed 'r s:ar such instrumert may affix the corporate seal. and a facsimile corpora:- seal affixed to any such ristrurnent shall be as effective and binding as the original seal. Section 6 A facsimile signature of the President. or of a Vice President. affixed to any bond. undertaking, or oblfoalory instrument Of similar nature, other than policies and endorsements. or to a Power of Attorney signed by such President. or a Vice President. 3s herein in Sections 2 and 3 provided. cr a facsimile signature of the Secretary. or of an Assistant Secretary to any certificate as herein in Section 4 provided. shall be effective and binding upon the Corporation with the same force and effect as the original signatures of any of such officers Section 7 A facsimile s gnature of a former officer shall be of the same validity as that of an existing officer, when affixed to any policy or endorsement, any bond or undertaking, any Power of Attorrey or certificate. as herein in Section 1. 2, 3 and 4 provided IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the Company has caused these presents to be signed by its President and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed th.s 28th day of September 19 84 • 1,1111� AID INSURANCE COMPANY (MUTUAL) �o;SEAL:: By. President STATE OF IOWA s �� �•.,,..•: COUNTY OF POLK ���• On this 28th day of September 19 84. before me personally came John E Evans lu me known who. being by me duly sworn did depose and say that he is President of AID Insurance Company (Muluall, the corocrat-on described in and which executed the above instrument: that he knows the seal of said corporaaun. that the seal affixed to said inslrument is such corporation seal: that it was so affixed pur,uanl to authority given by the Board of Directors of said corporation and that fie nas signed his name thereto pursuant to 'hike authority. and acknowledged the same to be the act and deed of said corporation An q- S A DENNING S A. Denning C1 ; air CMntr,14N APINF 5 Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa CERTIFICATE I the undersigned. Secretary of AID Insurance Company (Mutual). a corporation organized under the laws of the State Of Iowa. do hereby certify that the foregoing Power of Attorney is still in force, and further certify that Section 2. 3. 4. 5. 6 and 7 of Article IX of the By -Laws of the Company set forth in said Power of Attorney are still in force IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have suoscr0ed my name and affixed the seal of the company flits 7th day of April .19 86 ra This Puvrer of Attorney expires0 :SEA[.. 10 Secretary July 31, 1987 Rd 1 110 841 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SURETY STATE OF Iowa ) County of _ Polk ) On this 7 th day of _ April , 19 86 . before me personally appeared to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn, did say that he is Attorney -in -Fact of the Am TNIMIRANCE COMPANY IT lA1) , that the seal affixed to the foregoing mitrument is the corporate seal of that corporation and that said inst.ument was executed in behalf of the corporation by authority of its board of directors, and said AID- INSURANCE COMPAT4Y (j 1 TAL) acknowledged said Instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. A. P-:N rVG i (SEAL) COPY li - OF 2 EXECUTFD "k7h?23G-zZ� Notary Public S.A.-kenning Polk County, IMUM Iowa My Commission expires 4-13-86 J d � J W C a o ti A y IO F O a I Y' J DPS9131 (10-75) STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY BOND NO— 265864 LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION SURETY BOND CLUB ON SALE Ittaw all corn bg thror prearnts Thatwr—_1T4y_Z=_Cntlnt y r1iih as principal, and a -- rporation organited and existing under the laws of the State of and duly authorized to transact a corporate surety business in the State of Minnesota, as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the municipality of Orono ------ --- ----- Statc of Minnesota, in the penal sum of THRFF THOUSAND AND N01100_ ---- -- ---- dollars, grind and lawful money of the United States to be pa,d to said municipality of _ Orono Minnesota for which payment we bind ourselves, our hells, executors, administrators, successor and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these prc sents. h April 1 Sealed with our hands and seals this tdiy of Ap 19 Afi— Whereas The above Loudden principal desires to carry on the business of handling intoxicating liquors as club "On Sale" dealer, in the said municipality of Orono Minnesota, and is about to be ggrranted a license for that Purpose in pursuance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 340. as amended. NUW, THEREF(1RE, The condition of this obligation is such that if the principal shall comply with the terms of said license or any modifications, extensions or renewals thereof, and with the pprovisiuns of the above entitled act of the legislature of the State of Minnesota, and as it may at any time be amended and supplemented, and all other acts and laws of the State of Minnesota, and with the rules, re`ulationt and decisions lawfully made and issued by the proper authorities of the State of Minnesota relating thereto, and that if the said principal shall further Pay to the said municipality when due, all taxes, license Ices, penalties and other charges provided by law, and that in the event of any violation of the provisions of any law relating to the retail "On Sale" of intoxicating liquor, such bond shall be forfeited to the said municipality as in said act provided and that tf the satd p►mctpal shall, pay to the extent of the principal amount of tills obligation any damages for death or injury caused by or resulting from the violation of any of the provisions of this act, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect The surety company contents to be bound by this obligation, notwithstanding an, -( rmahly in its execution This band to for the license period commencing _ Tom._ lag . 1986 and rnduig -- itily..1-a_._l9$Z_-- - -- ---- -- Wuneu ,cur huiJs and seals thn --_- -%th--- --- day of -- April _- -- 1Y 86 Signed, sealed, and dfhvered tq.the prewil(e of __--_._�_ Wa Bt U (SCSI) , l � c pp _�._ • �. _ - _ _.. - --- --D. �— _ __ ♦. _ ,SCSI) (Seal) at to prinipal '�------ `- -` ----- --- ------ — - - (Seal) as t.i surety Mark A.' Stubbs Attorney -in -fact ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PRINCIPAL For Corporati^n STATE of M1NNFSoTA ) ss. County or HennePi-n I On this 17 th dal. o(_ June 10 86 before me appeared John A. Downey to me per tonally known, who, being duly sworn, did say that he is the General M.nil a er of the _ wsl.Y Z'3-,i C ti n t r y -C l i, h tut the seal affixed to the foregoing instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation; that said instrument was signed and healed os nalf of said corporation by ,.y7a t-a ^ountry authority of its board of Directors, and said acknowledged said instrument to be the (fee act and deed of said torporatiun. THOMM A. WiAEI$ NOIARY PUDIC - MINr1t;!)1A HENNEPIN COUNTY My commission expires April 19, IV91 (SEAL) rPhoma s A. W i n k e 1 s Notary R-ublk_ EI nne) County, Minnesota April 18, 1991 My Commission expires GIfY of 0110NOi I'ryvl lnlu 4. a_u, , . . , Crystal Imy, AlinneRota 5f)323 SEPTIC SYS`I E,M INSTALLERS LICENSE APPLICATION BUILDING & ZONING -- 473.7357 ASSF5SIN(; All questions must be answered. License lee, bond, certificate of insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification or home Sewage Treatment Workshop attendence must accompany this application. All applications are subject to a ten (10) day appro•,ul period. 1 . Business or trade name e-/actre_ 2. Business address 3. Business phone j�%�__c'� Residence phone 4. Name of applicant or ccmpany representative holding MPCA certification IQ ,Hr _ ', s/Ct ' S. Type of certification held: _ t�_ Installer Pumper Site evaluator System designer is thi:; a Provisional Certificate? Certificate No. 6. If no Certificate is held, providJ'evidence of At'en ance at one of the On -Site S..rage Treatment Workshops held irrmediatel prior to the current construction season. 7. Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? '/'_ Most recent year 8. Have you ever had a license revoked? t�0 When? Where? y. Do you do Municipal. Sewer hook-i• )s? Yes)_ No A S`U/BMITTALS REQUIRED: 73y9 rt' 10 X �� 1. $25.00 license application fee. Pc_r-"t t5 Y 2,. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted. 3. $10-50-100,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. 4. Copy of current MPCA Certificate or evidence of attendence U�(J1 at On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshop held immediately prior to current construction season. ./L LICENSES WILL NOT EE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED. List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license _ The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of Orono, Minnesota, for license to install and repair septic_ systems, and/or hump out septic tanks, subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the OrCinances of the City of Orono. Date "�6 )C• Applicants Signature ���,1�(/ �'4V0%. Staff recommendation Approval �_ Denial Date CITY Reason for denial: USE City Council Action_ Date _ Approvad Denied ONLY Date license mailed Poct off It.. M / UFY/of ORONO /Cr,%UI Day, Minnesota SM23 ///BUILDING a ZONING - 475J557 ASSFSSING SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS LICENSE APPLICATION nu yucnuuna n. ­.. c, iica�c of insurance, and evidence of MPCA Cer .fication or Home Sewage Treatment Workshop attendence must ar . mpany this application. All applications are subject to a tc 110) day approval period. 1. Business or trade name PJC54u left 2. Business address (OSIr' Co ✓Lct I S )%04)k1_11lKsy S 3. Business phone t/2.-1(1169 Residence phone 7L-4:0'40 4. Name of applicantof�tf cgqmmppany j;eprepgmtative holding MPCA certification LCL lci GL c (Rr( f��c 5. Type of certification held: 1/I1staller _ Pumper Site evaluator System designer 8i Is this a Provisional-Ceztificate? ry Certificate No._ 6. If no Certificate is held, provide evidence of attendance at one of the On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshops held immediatel prior to the current constructip: season. 7. Have you ever held a Septic System InstS11er license in Orono before? -W tj Most recent year IjS r8. Have you ever had a license revoked? n0 When? where? tI SUBMITTALS REQUIRED: ,1.�$25.00 14cense application fee. $2000.00 license and oermit bond naming City of Orono As obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepter. `$10-50-100,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. 4. Copy of current MPCA Certificate or evidence of attendance at On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshop held immediately prior to current co. struction season.. v4v4 i - vy,�j,� /Q ra LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTE .p List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license �R//h7 CLrMK-.T/4►r C[!IsLK The undersicned hereby makes application to the City of Orono, Minnesota, for license to install and repair septic systems, and/or pump ort septic tanks, subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of Orono. Date K-/n-gIIb Applicants Signature Staff recommendatio.. .ipproval � Denial _ Date CITY Reason for denial: USE City Council Action Date _ Approved — Denied ONLY City license mailed License NO. APPLICATION FOR SOLICITATION - $20.00 fee Date Received Date Expires CITY OF ORONO 1335 BROWN ROAD SOUTH BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 6\ organization:J)j':"Q1e121 /CLVP/:a Address: A?—.? . a� !:-,Krvfa ✓hi,. -� ,3�/ Representative: /i / Aw-'f' Address: i-Tam PJ (6-/J) Phone _ o1E& - Phone \5ctm P� Check One: Business Solicitation_ Contribution Solicitation Number of People Solicitating within the City ,�1�- Kzo Provide list of Names of Solicitors on back of this application. Type of Product to be solicited AE/ L 11Lu/,-h5 � &-v jlla z PERMIT EXPIRES 60 DAYS FROM APPROVAL DATE. POLICE CHIEF SHALL HAVE FIVE (5) BUSINESS DAYS IN WHICH TO INVESTIGATE AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION PURSUANT TO ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 5.30 SUBD 5(a). ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON SOLICITORS Subd. 3. Prohibited Solicitation ^ractices. A. It is unlawful for any solicitor to engage in solicitation for any unlawful business or organizational purpose or activity. B. It is unlawful for any solicitor to practice hares%ment, nuisance, theft, deceit, or menacing, troublesome or otherwise unlawful activities during the course of solicitation. C. It is unlawful for any solicitor to enter, or attempt to gain entrance, to residential premises displaying at such entrance a sign with the words "Peddlers and Solicitors Prohibited" or "Solicitors Prohibited". D. It is unlawful for any solicitor to refuse to leave business premises when requested by the owner, leases, or person in charge thereof. E. It is unlawful for any person to engage in contribution solicitation without completion of licensing or registration as herein provided. F. It is unlawful for any person to engage in business solicitation without a license as herein provided. -------------------------------------------------------------- The undersigned hereby agrees to the conditions quoted above from the Orono Municipal Code and any additional requirements the City staff may have. Signature of Applicant: /.�/- Asr� Date: I Z /'� �9R& FOR C1TY USE ONLYt After review of application, staff recommends the followings ✓ Approval of application Denial of application Signature of City Official: Date: Signature of Police Chief:s'"fs '' // ��pp��• = Ks�t.r.e Date: fo NAMES OF SOLICITORS Name: 1�/ /:>"Po' Address: .r's Phone: License No-S,X/-O•/�-tS/Ulo-1G Name: Address: Phone: License Name: Address: Phone: License Name: 7 Address: Phone: License No. f - .7.30- 58S-.4JU - 9i3 Name: Addr^s Phone: License Name: Address: Phone: License No. (If additional names, please attach list) ( RONO POLICE DEPARTMENT ' REC•D BY: INCIDDEEN ORONO POLICE RECORD CHECK REPORT DAY: s M T w T F B QD MEBS, I(EY CONTROL NUMBER IOCAI CONT. AGENCY NCIC (DENT. ICAGI E C II / M N 1 g 2 7 1 b D D / LNBR �1DATE ,R'EPO,RT��ED IRP N71�TI/ME RPO (TAP) j LOCATION GRIND NOR ILGN) / PUCE COMMITTED (PLC) / O LNBR NRO BADGE NOISBN) TIME ASIG.(TASI TIME ARR.(TAR) TIME CLR.(TCL) .Phoae eOR R-000 Radie /Rfl rl El El Y. VMW SUPERVISOR APPROVED: ENTEREOCA.R.S. ❑ M, Mae T m Otlrr Rport BY: DL3/ BIa. Nb. Ad4NR' Home Np. CmnplNn -� �LAnn —DOB/ �.._. PNPM w: w4 DMRIPdan: M (ATTACH TELETYPE IF APPLICABLE) AA I DL BUREAU DEPT. OF PUBLIC HEALTH -(MENTAL HEALTH - 296 2671. 8'30 A.M. to 4:30 P.M.) HENNEPIN CO'UyNT/YYn� WARRANTS - (348 2DOO or CDC H WA) RAMSEY COUNTY WARRANTS - (2984893 days. 4843366 nights) NCIC IOW FORMAT) , HOME TOWN WARRANTS HOMETOWN (ADDRESS& PHONE NO. VERIFIED? ) MILITARY-726-1148 ONLY IF CHECKS SHOW A POSSIBLE MILITARY RECORDI NOTICE Pursuant to Laws of Minnesota, 1984, Chapter 502, Article 8, Section 2 (270.72) (Tax Clearance; Issuance of Licenses), the licensing authority is required to provide to the Minnesota Coe,missioner of Revenue your Minnesota business tax identification num- ber and the social security number of each license applicant. Under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and the Federal Privacy Act of 1974, we are required to advise you of the following regarding the use of this infor- mation: 1. This information may be used to deny the issuance or renewal of your license in the event you owe Minnesota salts, employer's withholding or motor vehicle excise taxes; 2. Upon receiving this information, the licensing authority will supply it only to the Minnesota Department of Revenue. However, under the Federal Exchange of Information Agreement the Department of Revenue may supply this information to the Internal Revenue Service; 3. FAILURE TO SUPPLY THIS INFORMATION MAY JEOPARDIZE OR DELAY THE PROCESSING OF YOUR LICENSE ISSUANCE OR RENEWAL APPLICATION. Please supply the following information and return along with your application to the licensing authority. pplican 's Last Name - Est Name Middle Initial Applicant's 4yuress C it late, Zip Code a r G L .sSy_ Applicant's Social SeAurity No. Position O Partner, etc. C �4� See rer, 7 P . usmess eme Business ress City, State, Zip Code ! h li /yl - _ P . ,�333 nnesota ax Identiateation Number Z/z -;;? /'. -4 C f ro ate OFF SALE $25.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA ' Combination Application for Retailer's lJPM (OH -sale) 1 /Non -Intoxicating Malt liquor License Nw .r IInv.Iv..vaYla ImoNl LIVI InI1Iy.1 County of P! l I �f /id/t'// %. ilrG , of the city, villas., or town of "-"fin// county of- state state of .Utnnevela, hereby nrake application for a Retatler's (On -sale) (Off -sale) Non-intaxicatiw .halt Liquor License to sell such Note liquor under and pursuant to an ordinance (resolution) passed by city, villatre eoumcil, count/ board of �rnrv� //C�!)/I4'io/ a, and Chapter 540, Afrnnesota Statutes 1045, as amended, provi 'net for licensing and resutating ih; +ale of non-inlovieating malt liquor. / 4 DYTing the pact five years, my residence has been as folleuo': or ?1 I I was be /m+` DayYwr CIV VIYyr IYnw\ The 9uu.oCm.tr / am a (waUve) (naturalised) citizen of the United States. I a �id>" •^^rried. ,Hy (wife'.) (hwband's) name and address is f am proprietor. T J H 7 Firm was inmrpor¢ted—.Lfal �5 -x 1!2_jn the state of Ar+ne' c n64, Corporation is authorized to do Moines. M .tlLnrosota. License A forte S c!/ �(el ) (highway) laoated w Jonas: � 3 3 � �l oT'�inP .f >r' /!/ Li ✓!i //'P � /2(n 'i 5 7 > .7 The leense will be in connection with / Done Sure. C.h rau..ut B.IY. CM which has been in opti eraon YonIL Yore The establishment is lasted on th �liC' floe",. The breiness prrm(ses are owned by - The tax" on the property am me delingruni. I am ✓J4' f engaged in the retail sale of intoxicating liquor. l have e2 had an application for license rejected as follows: I have nervy bun convicted of a felony nor of violating any National or date liquor law or lama ordinance relating to the manufacture, sale or transportation, or posseusion for sale or transportation of intoxleatins liquor. (highway) located ae The license will be in connection with 'T t / arm atww W. n-l.ar.a n.W. CIA wanW which has been in operation Y.aw! The establishment is located on the — The buaimum premises are oumed by The taxes on the property are not delinquent. I am ✓?e7 engaged in the retail sale of intoxicating Liquor. I have /7G'� read an application for license rejected as follows: 1 ham never been convicted of a felony nor of violating any National or skis liquor law or Ionai ordinance relating to the manufacture, sale or transportation, or possession for sale or transportation of ;ntoxicating liquor. Gambling or gambling deuie" will not be permitted on the licensed promises. I am the owner of the leasehold, furniture, fixtures, and equipment in the premises for which the ltesnse !e applied, except I bays no intention or agreement to transfer the license to another person. I submit a foltowing games of persona, Including a henb, ter reference with whom I hays "fan.": >/P N y,•i - /J-l1'' �Y•rt.('D'f �/tliari// intend to engage in the ede of Intoxicating liquor and will have a Federal Oeeupatlo"l Tax Ramp, in accordance with the ordinance ggooveming this license. My Federal Tax Stamp Receipt I will comply strictly with t ;svisiona of the ordinance relating w the seta of aft drinks for "mixine purposes and will serve m I xgeee w my premises an, providing for th 1 hereby s agree to comply day .eersh and eeiruro and will lately permit paw officers to i"ppasct found to hors violated the provlslo" of ths_otdinanea (..lotion) u nde see true of and correct to the beat f , ypdpf which this license in granted. � a 34 i. a ae U.'" s,.w ..e .a..,e m ..m e,.,.l .h.—. .ae ,.ear w h.•a y. M fl A .b .� .r.a...wn .f W wuhLLh.wa far .IIA Wa Ilmr� .n W.K Ls INe v rM .axat t' fN)IiDT11Y Y. sthUlN torssn sutscsOUNTYtt NENNEFIN COUNTY N mm eEpl .oeas asks CITY OF ORONO ia.� �t2eldo EMP -NO NA E )IV P A Y i GROSS GRJSS EKP/ALLOY ANDERSON OL 31 16065.18 1227.52 BERNHARDSO ME 12 20307.84 1692.32 DOOZIEN SA 31 9083.87 684634 BOSMA JL 12 1716,00 294.00 BRINKHAUS JF 42 14675,91 1191.36 CARLSON YJ 92 14749,75 1313.73 CHESWICK GB 31 15835655 1316.56 CLARK 8P 31 9528,39 759.84 CORNICK JL 31 10234.07 845.32 EHRENBERG DL 90 3946,10 276.92 ENGLISH II IH 31 12160,37 111D.66 ERICKSON DJ 93 416.53 151.90 ERICKSON KR 31 16185.58 1204.08 FINK CJ 90 19.00 19.00 FRITZLER JM 31 15531aRR 1508.11 GAFFRON MP 33 12649,52 1054.88 GERHARDSON JR 42 18158,38 1514.40 GREGORY JO 42 12867.91 1007.34 HALLIN DM 12 10433.31 895.34 HANSEN SC 42 11440669 904016 HANSING CJ 31 4273*02 333.69 HENNING JP 90 60.DO 63000 HENSEL MM 31 9150.36 823.95 HIGUS PA 90 4263*47 502.87 HILL OE 93 142680 58.80 JACOBS TJ 33 12153955 1313.60 JOHNSON RP 31 15020991 1204.08 KIL60 MH 31 18518.09 1544.40 KIRNYCZUK M 31 15216.55 1204.OB KLAERS AB 12 1659.30 0000 KNUTSON CA 15 8105.62 717.72 KRUEGER JA 90 906.75 256.50 KUEHN IM 15 16785.71 1399.92 LATTIN JC 15 10291.69 858.32 MABUSTH JA 33 15380*41 1282@72 MANUEL CM 90 1724.BO 0.00 MCGOYAN LR 90 12618.Z4 1351.52 MORONCZYNS J 31 17225.87 1260.52 MROSS FT 61 10052.55 181.50 NAAR TL 12 6086*15 585.4L OAS DO 93 617.40 102.90 OMAN LE 33 6386.06 655.20 PETERSON PL 12 5726*11 420.36 PETERSON RY 93 693.00 136450 OUAST WA 92 11914.97 954.88 ROTCRAFT GE 93 0000 0000 SASS JJ 42 11892*40 1022.83 SIEVERS RC 90 1100000 30.00 SKREEN OS 4Z 11573.62 94809 SLIGO SR 93 704.00 204.60 SMITH JR 92 11674810 991.52 Ec'S1s L`s C -aY w CITY OF ORONO P A Y R Y-T-D -- ---- ER'L-40 NAME DIV GROSS GROSS EXP/ALLOY STEFFENHAG RE 93 12124.77 1011s20 STEVENS• BG 93 1170*36 28T.03 THIES OR 90 18A2.50 215.D0 THOMTON MR 31 8631.30 1016.29 TOMCHECK LF 31 ♦015.28 766.96 TOMCZYK MN 31 15648.50 1204.08 COUNT GRAND 439978058 'AID 10054 TOTAL 00051 TOTAL TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS = 229800-65 EM5LOYERS FICI A = GROUP HEALTH 8 = PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN C = BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD D = MEDICAL CENTER PLAN E = PRUDEATIAL I F = COORD. HEALTH CARE G = MINNESOTA HMO H a TRANS-AMERICA OCC. I = BANKERS LIFE J = MUTUAL SERVICES K = MUTUAL OF OMAHA L = EMPLOYEEIS BENEFIT M = AETNA N = NICOLLET EIFEL 0 = LEAGUE OF CITIES Z = HEALTH CAR° NAINT ACCT. MISSING HOSP CODE FOR SOME =MPL•S CITY OF ORONO ) P A Y R I �Uf.�OCII�tH Y_T_U • - - - _ - - 'MPL-,9/] NAHE DIV GROSS GROSS EKP/ALLOY ADAMS T 11 132Ow0Q 220.00 BUTLER MC 11 1650eDO 215.OD FRAHM T 11 1320.00 220.00 GRABEN J 11 1320.00 220.00 HAMMEREL J 11 1320.00 220oOO COUNT GRAND 19155000 j PAID 00005 TOTAL 00005 TOTAL TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS = .00 EMPLOYERS FICA A = GROUP HEALTH B = PHYSICIAN'S HEALTH PLAN C = BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD 0 = MEDICAL CENTER PLAN E = PRUDEATIAL F = COORO• HEALTH CARE G = MINNESJTA HMO H = TRANS-AMERICA OCC. I = BANKERS LIFE J = MUTUAL SERVICES K = MUTUAL OF OMAHA L = EMPLOYEEIS BENEFIT M = AETNA N = NICOLLET EITEL 0 = LEAGUE OF CITIES Z = HEALTH CARE MAINT ACCT. MISSING HOSP CODE FOR SOME EMPL'S 1916 CITY OF 9PUNJ .NECK REGISTER C6-J3-1A P14F 1 _ CHECK Al. GATE Amount TENOOR I/ER OESCRIPt10N ACCOUNT NO• INT. 0 P.U. P P.'.A..,. 171CO2 .b/14186 1.50 A-1 •:NNEIJNKA RENT EOUIP RENTAL 01-A 331-J99-17 7.50 • ...... ...... MOO. C6119/9f 127.41 ACRO-MINMESOTI INC OFF SUPPLIES 11-4210-039-12 • 114S36 36/19/96 23.52 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFF SUPPLIES 81-4210-959-1• 3TAOC6 06/t A/96 25.55 ACRO-RINNLSOTA INC OFF SUPPLIES 91-4210-069-15 STAID. 06/2"a6 59.64 ACRO-NIMNESOIA INC OFT SJPLtES 01-1210-129-31 • 176036 C6/19/96 50.72 A:RO-PINN-SOTA INC OFF SUP+LIES 51-•210-1TA-}3 174006 C6119/EE 23.52 ACRO-HIM41SOTA INC O•F SUPPLIES 31-1219-241-42 114006 26/18/86 22.13 ACRO-HIM1¢SOTA INC OFF SVP+LIE} 11-4210-590-93 • 339.49 .....• ...-CRS • 14019 C6/19/B6 25.79 AHERICAN LINEN ANT 9LSGIGRCS 11-4313,15-9J 25.T9 . • • 1)AJSO Co/1A/96 1.90 AT A T IN:3 SYSTEM vil-liONE 12-4320-149-VI 174030 06/18/96 2.70 AT A I IAF3 SYSTEM .:PHONE 13-1320-569-92 1.50 • 114331 C6/18186 2.6A AT L T C011 TE.EPN3NE 01-4329-039-12 119031 06/19/86 .69 AT L T CC41 TELEPHOOIE Ot-4!20-LTA-!3 • MOM 36/108f 4J1 AT L T CC11 TEL`.ONE OI-4329-115,34 7.iA • •••... .... IN, IM42 CS/1N1BE 39.50 ASPLJNO CJ?FEF MT6 'KP'ISE Ci-•ll2-020-31 • 1140.2 06/19/BE 34.50 ♦:PLUM C3FFEE MYG EKP!NSE R-UP2-i/A-33 79.i0 • uu.. •..-CKS 1710.5 0.11919E 55.00 bLACKONIAK L SONS MIKA 3L3S/G433 21-4313-099-11 • ITLS65 Sb/16/86 30.00 BLACAORIAK L SUNS NMI ALOE/GROS T1-4343-515-96 93.00 • ...... .... Cgs 17AO85 C6/1R/8E 8A.R5 aJOGET PRY'. PRIG/PJlL 01-4332-129-31 • BA.95 • 1799BF C6/1B/B6 279.55 RJRT L CARLSON INC ST MMI SUP 51-4233-2.9-.2 279.S5 • ...... ....CAS l• 174091 06/1A/86 4A.79 CAPITOL CITY 31SY MIME PURCN 71-491Y51.-95 c 1996 CITY Of ORONO CHECK W. DATE 114130 174130 114130 11,4130 114143 I74343 1741.3 1/41.3 114143 LY41.3 174143 124143 1 T4143 IF41.3 114143 V4/43 Ob/18/96 C611818C L6/16186 06/1a/at vfi/la/tl• 06/18/86 06119,86 00/18/Bt 99/18/e6 0611MISE 06JSa/8. C6/la/96 Ob/19/06 36/18/96 AMOUNT 486.:9 •35.10 63S.2a 1 rOi1. 90 3.. t 29.30 T1.03 15.00 128.50 L39.M4 239.00 S.'S lay 11.00 3.449.30 2.060.00 1 at.:a 943.V0 630.-O 2.623.30 16S.21 165.11 . 3.60 2.70 3.69 3.63 9.59 3.60 5.40 .90 2.10 1.08 1. .2 .90 35. IO . 44.50 21.09 65.58 CMECA REGISTER VE90CR Ric" DESCRIPTION COCA COLA VEM01M6 RI■ PUNCH COCA COLA XEIDIM6 CON: RESALE COLONIAL LIFE IN; CO HEALTH INS COLONIAL LIFE !MS CO xEAL14 INS COLONIAL LIFE INS CO WALT" INS COLONIAL LIFE INS CO HEALTH US COMMERCIAL BL36 MAY JANITORIAL SERV CJAA-REM SALES TAR CJRM-REV SLLCS TAR COMM-REV 'SALES TAX COMA -REV .ALES TAX COMB -REV SALES TAX CSRM-REV SALES TAA CORM -REV SALES TAX COMA-PEV DALES TAX COPY UJP -4 INC COMNERC IAL Ia, ; CJRMEACSAI. LIFE 3.NS COMMERC Ir. LIFE IMS COMMERCIAL LIFE INS COARERC'LL LIFE IB; COMMERCIAL LIFE INS COMMERCIAL LIFE INS COMMERCIAL LIFE INS COMRERCIAL LIFE IRS COMMERCIAL LIFE IMS COMMERCIAL LIFE IMS COMMERCIAL LIFE Ski CULLIGAN CIILLIGAN SALES T44 MAI SOLES NV MAY SALES TAM MAY SALES YAM MAY EST 112 JUME TX l;T L12 JJME TX SALES TAX RAI 1.T l/2 DUNE TV J=F SJP•LIES LIFE 141 LIFE INS LIFE INS LIFE INS LIFE INS LIFE 19; LIFE INS LIFE INS LIFE IRS LIFE INS LIFE IRS LIFE INS PAT SLOG/440S ANT 1LIG/;RC3 06-23-46 PAGE 2 XCCOUMT 40. I.W. 0 P.L. A PL.SA4E 11-482N-S14-v6 t4-{eU2-691-i• 11-415t-t21-St 31-W I-121-31 01-41!1-1M-31 21-41!1-129-31 11-4349-099-It m-2zz z-Jco-J9 J1-2222-000-04 41-2222-OJ}OC T1-2222-000-00 -2222-00-00 12 12-2222-090-OC T.-2122-O60­OC it-2122-CU0-LC 11-4?13-129-31 11-4352-039-12 01-41.2-049-15 ]t-•132-Ia-31 ]t-•1!2-1A-31 !1-U'2-121-31 01-41E2-1I4-33 ]1-N 52-L49-H ]3-4152-290-i1 I1-4152-51}90 12-41 `2-64}93 tS-N52-SO}9a i•-4t!2-590-93 01-4343-391-11 11-4343-51S-90 ....CAS ...-CRS 1945 CITY OF OeONU r :NECK W. JATE t• r u•1as :>ne/n6 I I•l6] 'e/Itl/ek r IHI9r Co/18/9b llan 1 0a/19I ea q 119r Cb/1R/Bo t1 .uu• 1T.23T 36/Itl/He v6zsl nsn Y/e6 � lI.237 C6/IH/e6 1 t•23r 06 /18/96 � 1/•256 06/la/P6 V •25B CbI18/Bo A I In 2.D Cc/iP/9i P 1/•2tl• 3b/I9/96 1P .0 u• 1r♦33] 96/1e/e6 I u.u. . 1/4335 06/18/86 <1 11 •S51 c6/18/R6 :NEC. REGISTER AMOUNT YENOci ITER DESCRIPTION 1.599.F0 OAT IISTnI3YT1Rs c0 KER PURCN 22.b0- DAY DISTRINUTENG CO 92T RET 1.511.10 3.189.95 EAST SIDE +EYiRAGE SCE• •UTCN 12.00- EAST SIDE 3E9Ci66E DDT REI 196.10 EAST SIDE 3EYE:"E BEER PWCN 3.361.15 206.10- FOUR STAN NI■ PJn:H 206.10 FOUR STAR 419 PUNCH 206.10 FOUR STAR NIN PUNCH 58.10 F3UR STAR 9L06/GRJS RVi SJ' 26•.90 73.98 GE6UlNC fAtTS CO ExJIP/PIS/ACC`.SS 23.36 +3.50 6.E+ADSO INGLE0000 UTILITIES• •3.50 145.30 GOLF C3URSC SUPF A54 RENHERSHIP 145.00 43.80 HAPPYS PCTATJ CNIP C24C RESALE •3.90 06-23-9. ~) s FLCdYNT NJ. {sY. • 9. J. 9 R. iL u. n-•Sls-sl•-,. /l-•.I F51•-95 11-•1-31•-95 11-4 81 6-sl4-+5 I•-•nTS-SiI-f• /\-AetO-Ste-75 n-•ea-sl+-n 33-Re xe-s1•-+3 I•-•3 ]1-Ste-Ss 01-42 .+-42 01-4324-C.+ I3 H-• NO-s90-YS F4-4832-591-9+ 71.92 ICRA RETPRDT COOP It.. $119 TO 6/1/.6 2-239-12 71.92 2T0.00 ILLIES 6 SON OLOW6RO NUT SUP 41-4231-M-61 270.20 966.48 INTERNAL RENENJE FLa34 T41 2M3 OF] 71-2221-000-00 1Y96 CITY OF ORON3 CHECK REGIST_R 06-23-8 PAGE • ZHECK NJ. JATE AMOUNT VEV00t ITEM 7ESCRIPTION ACCOUNT W. INV. # P.O. a ML..SA4,_ 174351 Ob/19/86 5t.00 IHTERN4L R:YEb.E Fr-) TAX STAMP J1-4393-515-90 Ir4351 06/10/66 24.00 ItATERNAL REVENUE FED TAX STAMP 74-4i8:-590-93 Ir�22.a4 • a ...•.• •••-CKS e 1743,3 "('/1086 69.09 TOM JACOES MILEAGE 01-4381-114-33 69.C9 • ...... S 1I�372 ;n/1R/dE 95.02 J)MNS AUTJ SUPPLY :,UIP/PTS/ACCESS 01-42'2-249-42 qb 95.b2 • ...... ••.-CKS 1/a31� Ob/18/8c 144020 H V JUHN'.13% :JLVERT St •NT SJP 31-4233-249- 42 144.20 • .•••.s •••-CKS 1743d5 3ti/ld/86 ll.b7 KEAVENYS JiUv OFF SJP-PLIES :1-4218-IJ4-33 174395 CS/1818E 2.16 KEAV_RYS JRUG OFF SJMMLIES 14-4210-:i0-93 13.33 • � ...••. ••.-CKa 11433J 96/ld/Bb 23.21 KING SUPER VA"J£ 3L961WAOS NAT SUP 74-4231-oi0-93 :Ia3d1 :u/ld/8E 4.4.r. KING SUPER VA_u£ CONC RESALE 14-49.2-591-94 29.).4 • ...... ...-CKS • 174434 lb/18/9E 39.65 LONG LAKE iLAS.i MNT BLD416RCi 01-4343-C99-17 32.b5 ..••.• •••-CKS 174439 o"l+i/3t 57.99 LONS Y FJ20 TRACIJR EiJI°/PTS/ACC:SS 74-42!2-590-i3 57.99 • ••••.. •.•-CKS • 1744u0 :6/13/86 30.30 MARK V I I JIST WINE DURCH 71-4P_12--314-ib 114460 36/ld/86 20401.70 MARK VII GIST BEER PURCH 71-4p15-514-4� • 1744e0 05/18/85 60.00- MARK VII AST SOT RET 71-4e16-=14-i 11: 179.5C MARK VII AST BEER 'UACN 74-4°_I5-SSl-ya 2��Sl.tJ • ` 17446? 05/18/06 222.ti6 MARTIT; AAdAiR; 05 AJTO "VT .1-6341-12�-31 1744i2 36/.8/86 969.57 MARTIN; AAiARR_ 3b AJTJ =OJIF ?1-•530-I29-31 a ...... ••.-CKS A 1936 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER C6-23-at PAf.E 5 F CHECK N1. DATE AMOu•+T VENDOR ITEM 3E3;RI°TIO3 ACCOUNT NO. INV. A -v.0. A MESSAr#L R 1T4474 06/14/96 14.312.18 M-Tk1 BAST_ CONTRUL MdCC JULY 6" 7S-1292-000-GO 10,312.t9 • ..•... ...-CKS MIOY=qT ASPHALT ST M%T SUP u1-4233-249-42 114+i0 OS/19/80 469.71 MIDWEST AS'HALT UTIL SYS MAT SUP 72-42!4-549-91 2,971.42 • ot •••-CKS A ll4+!11 lb/18/86 33.50 MPLS OXYG=4 CJ MNT RISC EQUIP 01-4342-241.1-42 33.60 • 116v9,3 36/18/85 62.15 M11,NioASC7 UTI.ITIES 31-4324-099-11 A 62.15 • A 174531 (5/19/dF 112.00 CITY 7F Pl't%ETR1STA TREE 31SPISAL G1-4391-249-42 112.00 • to •..-CKS A 114534 .5136 .75 MOTORJLA INC MNT KIS: CQUIP 01-4342-149-42 174534 io/18/86 9:.15 MJTJROLA IIC MvT MIS: EQUIP 12-4342-549-91 114534 06/19/87, :ZJ.23 MOTORJLA I+1C M`tT MIS: EQUIP 13-4!42-5S9-92 � 501.13 • •s•-,r,Ki O 1/4i4S .a/13/96 13R.S0 NAVARRL AJTO REPAIR' M%T AJTO '.1-4!41-1T4-S3 IOd.6G • 174i4d ?6/18/9E 101.)7 NAVARR_ HARDWARE 90S MNT SUP 31-4231-099-11 t14544 Ob/l8/86 A.98 `JAVARRE PA13JARE dLD: M%T SUP 11-42!1-290-b1 i74549 06/18/86 83.73 1AVARPE HAZDdARE E3UI0/*TS/ACCESS 11-4232-129-31 174549 C6/18/d6 58.11 HAVARRE HAtCJARE £QUIP PTS ACC ---SS 01-4232-174-33 114548 WWII(; 5.49 NAVAIRE HARDWARE :.QUIPIPTS/ACCESS 01-4232-249-42 17454d 06/18/86 3.10 4AVA2RE HARDWARE EQUIP/PTS/ACCESS 11-4232-515-9C 174544 06/18/8E 5.T4 NAVARRE I4420WARE EQUIPIP13/ACCESS 12-4232-549-91 11.54d J6/16/86 11.51 NAVARRE HARDWARE EQUIP/PTS/ACCESS 13-4?32-569-92 171548 G6/IR/86 6'3.05 NAVARKE HARDWARE EQUIP/PTS/ACCESS 74-4232-590-93 348.93 •••-CKS C 1745:)0 C6/18/8E 25.00 NELSON ENTERPRISES LIQ PJR:a 71-4910-514-95 174553 OS/19/9E 105.00 N=LSON ENTERPRISES WIN_ PURCH 71-4912-514-95 17i5�. C,/19/dc 1.7G N_LiJN ENT_RPRISES BEER PURCM 71-4115-514-V5 134b CITY OF ORONO CHECK RE'.ISTER C6-23-8e PAs-E b :H°CK !.J. DATE AMOUNT VE1002 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOJNT NO. INV. 11 D.C. 8 MLS,Au'_ 1141iJ 06/18/86 2.51 NELSJN EST=RPRISES MIR PURCH 11-4920-514-95 134.50 • •.•••• ••.-CKS 174:,5i C5/ld/R6 210.46 NSP UTILITIES 01-4324-099-11 174559 0b/18/8E 42.65 NSP UTILITIES 01-4324-249-42 114559 06/18/86 4.11 N3P UTILITV:1 01-4324-290-61 174551 0b/18/8E 897.33 NSp ST LITES 31-4325-249-42 11+5`i3 06/18/ee 1.189.21 NSP UTILITIES 11-4324-549-91 174559 00/18/96 19347.33 NSP UTILITIE3 13-4324-569-92 174559 06/18/8E 45.95 NSP UTILITIES 14-4324-590-93 39727.70 • 114'i,3 0S/13/8C 41.92 NORTHWESTERN SELL T=L=PHONE 31-4322-129-31 174_io8 06118/B: 11.50 NORTHWESTERN JELL T:L=PHONE 01-4320-249-42 11496d 36/ld/3v 20.72 N?RTHW=ST_iM d:LL T:LcPHJtiE C1-4355-009-15 i74558 O6/18/8£ 51.33 NJRTHYEST=iN dELL T:L`_'PHOVr 11-4320-515-9G 114a6a 06/ld/86 12-45 NORTHW`-STLIN WELL A3VERTISIN6 71-432'-315-UG 1/r 06/18/3E 21.79 N3RTHWzSY:IN BELL TEL:21HONE 12- 020-549-`!1 06/1`1/86 16.57 4ORTIMEST:2N BELL T:L7-P,43%C 12-4355-549-91 1r45a8 06/lts/9E 32.70 N9RTHWESTERN BELL TrL=PHONE 13-432^-369-92 1145s9 06/18/8E 24.96 NORTHMESTt4N dELL TELEPHONE 13-4 " 5-569-92 249.94 • •..:.. •••-CKS 1l4;,2 C:./Ii/8c 13.1-, OMAq/LrLL MILEAGE 01-4!ai-174-3s 73.111 - ...... •..-CKS 1(4"i91 C6/13/16 67.04 PUBLIC EM2- R:T ASSN P'RA 5/19 TO a/1/Nb 31-4141-1539-12 1r4:197 26/19/96 4.21 PUBLIC EPPL R:T ASSN Pr -RA 5119 TJ 6/l/46 31-4141-040-13 114591 t6/Id/d6 3.83 PJRLIC EM+L RET ASSN Pt -RA 5119 TJ 6/1/de 31-4141-359-14 1/:591 06/1P/96 105.24 PUBLIC EPPL R_T ASSN PERA 5114 TJ 611116 01-4141-Ob9-15 114591 3b/ld/8E 19.67 PUBLIC EP2L R-T ASSN PERA 5119 TJ o/1/36 31-4141-C39-17 114591 06/ld/86 1.152.13 PJBLIC EPPL RET ASSN P°RA 5/19 TJ 6/1/46 31-4141-111-31 1T4:.41 06/14/86 43.07 PUBLIC EP2L R:T ASiN PIRA 5/19 TJ 5/l/d6 :1-4141-115-31 114547 GS/18/ 96 345.66 PJRLIC EP2- RCT ASSN P_R4 5113 T3 a/1/i6 31-4141-121-21 114S3/ 06/18/86 500.51 PUBLIC EPPL RET ASSN PLRA 5119 TO 6I1/36 C1-4141-126-31 111#.,a/ O6/18/86 195.12 PUBLIC EPPL RET ASSN PERA 5119 TJ i/1/46 31-4141-174-33 174;,i1 06/Id/86 185.71 PUBLIC EMOL R-rT ASSN P:4A 5111 TJ 611186 C1-4141-[49-42 114591 3611818E 66.55 PUBLIC EPPL RET ASSN PERA 5119 TO 6/1/46 31-4141-290-61 174591 06/13/86 149.41 PJRLIC EPPL RET ASSN PERA 5/1) TO 611/16 71-4141-to15-9L 114597 3611818E 173.11 PJRLIC EPPL RET ASSN PLRA 5119 TO o/1/^16 12-4141-549-91 11459E C5/li/86 16?.46 PUBLIC E14PL RET ASSN PIRA 5119 TJ 3/1/86 13-4141-559-92 114531 06/18/8E 49.13 PUBLIC EPPL R'T ASSN PIRA 5/19 TO 6/1/4S 14-4141-59C-33 3.158.71 • 114549 06/19/96 9.') PERA INS LIFE 143 31-41`.2-124-31 1'�36 CITY OF OR0410 :ri_CK t/0. DATE I14ca11 36/13/86 •••.•. 174011 Ob/18/86 174634 Ob/18/8E 114634 05/18/86 174634 -C6/ld/86 114534 C6/18/86 174638 .6/18/db 114b38 06118/8E 174643 G6/18/9E 114543 ,,is/18/de 174543 C6/ld/86 174S43 06/19/RE 174643 6.611a/86 174643 36/18/9E 174543 06/14/96 174;,43 06/19/86 L6/18/46 66/18/86 ita712 06/18/86 :74712 06/18/36 174712 26/1R/86 t1�712 J6/18/86 174712 06/18/86 114712 CS/18/86 174712 06/16/86 114712 06/18/86 174712 06/18/96 114112 06/1B/86 174712 C6/19/8E 11411I ON6/18/86 AMOUNf 242.55 242.55 • 53.32 53.32 • HECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION P:PSI COLA/7U-1 BTLG Mix 'UR:M PHOTO FACT3RY OFF SJPPLIES C6-23-86 PAGE 1 %':COUNT N0. 1t*V. A P.O. • MLSS"L 11-4420-514-N.i 01-4210-129-31 4.10 PJGREBA CIST SJP )l-4230-515-9J 29914.45 POGR_BA DIST =t PJgCH 71-••915-�i•-95 136.96- PJGREBA CIST uoT R_T 11-4F1f-314-95 6i.50 PDo'R_ts4 CIST Mix pUR:4 11-4?20-514-9t) 29850.19 • 30.10 PRAIRIE CFFSET P4T6/PJJL 11-4312-039-12 30.00 PRAIRIE CFFSET PRTG/PU3L :1-4322-174-33 bC.GO • 21.33 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS 01-4152-069-15 13.75 PRUDENTIAL LIF_ INS 31-41•_2-121-31 21.60 PRUDENTIAL LIF_ INS C1-4152-126-31 24.6C PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS 31-4152-129-31 5.40 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS 01-4152-249-4Z 34.31 PRUDENTIAL LIFE 114; 11- 4152-515-9C 4.92 PRUO_t+TIAL LIFE INS 72-4152-549-91 7.38 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS 13-41S2-519-92 139.99 • 199.40 R_�J CANCY A TJHACCJ C34: a: -'SALE 74-4812-591-34 193.43 • 233.73 O.O.:.R.S.S.4-T J!V FICA 5114 TJ 6/1/36 C1-4142-039-12 7.06 D.O.=.R.S.S.R=T 31V cICA 5/11 fJ o/1/45 01-4142-040-13 6.44 O.O.E.R.S.S.RET Jlr FICA 5/19 TO a/1/i6 31-4142-^59-14 117.Cd 0.0.=.R.S.S.R=T JIV FICA 5113 TO o/1/46 01-4142-369-15 31.43 0.0.=.R.S.S.R-T DIV FICA 5119 TO 511146 :1-4142-099-11 11.34- O.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 5/17 TO 6/l/16 01-4142-111-d1 11.34 D.O.:.R.S.S.RET IV MDC4 lf'# TJ o/l/46 51-4142-111-31 11.3• D.O.=.R.S.S.R:T DIV FICA :J19 T3 5/1116 01-4142-111-31 72.47 0.0._.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 5/19 TO 6/1/46 01-4142-115-31 3.�l D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV MJCR 5/19 TO 611/46 O1-a142-126-31 32:.23 0.0.=.R.S.S.R:T DIV FICA 5/19 TJ 9/1/36 11-4142-114-33 312.43 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET OIV FICA S/19 TO 6/1/es 11-4142-249-42 111.J6 0.0.=.R•S.S.RET JIV FICA 5/1l TO .1-11142-290-61 •.•-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS 1+4:, CITY OF JRJNJ • Z-4rCK NU. DATE ARMT 17411 0611419E 65.11 114 71; 2i/1'1/8E 6b.34 114712 C5/11/84 136.-11 • 174712 06/18/86 11.64 11411' 06/14/86 80.46 1s559.69 • • 1T4711 66/18/86 153.00 153.00 • 174751 •06*418186 122.14 122.14 • • 114110 J6/18/8E +.969.21 1T471;, :.6/18/86 31.�C .� �.CSC.�1 • • 17►71i2 06/ld/86 12- 74 C6/14/96 30.12 e 42.10 • • il�3S� 0b/l11/86 688.20 689.23 • • ••fff• • 1748So Z6/18/86 9C5.5C 905.53 • 1748T3 Oo/ld/86 42.50 •ffff• 114900 0511418E 6b.:C 6i; 0 • • 1143.1 Z6 1-/Bc 25.70 25.30 • IT49J2 0b/Ic/B6 50.CG 50.CJ • 1749^3 Ci/li/8E 95.JL s CHECK RLGISTER 66-23-1ty PAGE 8 VENDOR ITE4 Jr-SCRIPTIJN ACCJUNT NO. i14V. a P.Q. t MESSA',_ O.O.C.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 5/19 To 6/l/d6 71-4142-515-90 DIV FICA 5/1T TO 4/1/46 J:-4142-549-51 O.O.=.R.S.S.R_T DIV FICA SI1i TO o/1/66 /t-4142-569-92 D.O._.R.S.S.RET DIV M)Ci 5113 TJ h/1/ib 14-4142-590-93 O.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 5/19 TJ 6/1/36 14-4142-590-93 •••-CKS DIKIE 'JETRO-CNEM JTI: SY> YAT JUP 72-42_4-549-91 SFFW44T SAYONIZ-i IhZ :3%: A=SALE 14-4312-591-94 THORPE GIST CJ PUICM 71-4815-514-9'� THORPE GIST CO d_ER PURCH J+-4e15-`s91-`!4 TJPCZYK/I@AiK C3NF/;C400LS 01-45E6-129-31 TJ"CZYK/MARK -41LEA'.E :1-43i1-129-31 6ARNI%c, L1TES INC EQUIP R=.ITAL 1.I-43.41-249-42 YIOM:R BRCS ::YzR CJYST 13-4531-320-83 AMIIAY/A 2ILVERA--R6 Mi0 il3l Pjici 14-4801-591-94 AREL +. 9Cii MTS EXP-NS_ 11-4392-020-11 MIKE CARLiON TE143 01-4120-129-31 RJYALE OCSSETT-- R JJSSET'. 01-2300-080-00 OAN :OR LT) C3NF/SC433LS 31-6356-129-31 • •*-CK; -••-CKS •••—CKS ••*-CtIS I)R6 CITY OF IRONS =HcC.% Al. JATE • 1rA90• • 17o9Q6 17�1^r • 170 l,�,o • 1743C9 • 114710 0 1/�IlI • O �+ Ncr7s3 HC7753 HZ7753 O NCIT53 H=T1-3• H-1154 ri:r1�♦ • H: 7 7 • N::77it) • H_-717a ►izT I:0,5 • • NC7753 • �u/li/9F Jo/1 d/tl6 t;S/1�J66 C6/1918t 05/18/3c 36/19/86 .,6118186 C6/14/4c rh/1'1/ 9e C6/ld/9E US/18/8E C6118/86 36/18/86 :6/18140 -COUNT 95.00 • 50.00 51.30 • .10 .10 • '330.59 59�.59 • ♦9.�Q A9.J0 • 23.12 23.32 • 177.2R 117.28 • 235.:D 235.00 • 216.00 216.00 • 50.00 50.00 • 2964R.2♦ 52.4 2- 505.75 5.05- 39096.12 • 545.17 10.90- 71.15 606.02 • 7C6.40 13.ad- 692.92 • 292.40 2.92- 289.A8 • 19150.C7 CHECK REGISTER /ENDCA ITE`i ::.5 KIPf IJ'1 CHARLES CvLLAR OLAI HANSJU STEY:NS Y:LL SPARKLING LINTS T31AL RENIAL MICHAEL RO9INS3N REGISTER PZO 3VLPMT SHERATJN 4LOWAV MARK MUNSL_Y QJALITY UItiE JJALITY Y!YL QJALITI DIVE QUALITY YIVE ED PMILLIP.i ED PdILLIPS ED PHILLIPS PRIOI tlIh= PRIOR MIN_ 1';Tt;C^NTIVENTAL PK3 I01TE4C(,NTIYENTAL PKG EAGLE JIST 7JLLAR 1333 RFD 4's4f JI_dPI PVT "is: cJUip MNT MIS: c3JIP ]UIP R=YTAL 1:2• C3% /SC-tJ3LS C3NF/3C4OOLS HJN^.LEY 1031 LIO 'JR:d LIJ DISC YIN_ PUI:4 WINE 3ISc AIY_ PU2CH YiN: PURCM 6iER PU4CM WINE aU4CM WINE DISC YTN_ PACA WINS 3I3C LIQ 2UR:H 06-23-a,, PAt,E 4 ACCOUNT NU. INV. 0 ?.U. A 71-2310-J:0-J'' 45-3279-000-OC 14-4342-596-93 71-4342-515-9C 74-4151-540-113 :1-3512-040-00 01-43=6-C39-12 �1-♦396-039-1� 31-2390-000-OG .*.-:Ks •••-CKS 71-•?10-51•-yS MA'..;AL 11-4e11-514-95 MANUAL 71-4Al2-51•-9:, MANUAL 71-9213-314-95 MANUAL 71-4812-514-15 PANJAL 11-4e13-514-95 MANUAL 71-4E15-514-95 MANUAL 71-4812-514-i*j MANUAL 71-4e13-514-93 14A`tUAL T1-•912-S1•-15 #1A14LAL 71-4°13-514-95 MANJAL •••-CK- 71-4PA°.JAL 1)36 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE HC77-id 313/14186 HC7759 36/18/86 HC7754 :6/18/86 HC1754 06/18/86 HC7759 36/18/96 HZ:7759 06/14/85 HC77b� 36/1a/4c HC77ti9 76/18/8E N.7760 06/18/86 iCIP60 u611d/86 H:776^ 06/1St8E AMOU'IT 23.06- 337.51 b.63- 46.33 19514.22 • 26.30 .26- 25.14 • 1�367.54 27.35- 112.S1 2.25- 14.70 19465.25 • 149073.23 905.50 ll.u0 . 70 31.515.38 29211.96 lb•166.94 49269.50 619154.21 CHECK REGISTER VENODA ITEM D_3ZAIP►IJM EAGL: GIST LIO 3IS: EAGL= DIST WINE PORCH EAGLE DIST WIN_ PJiCH EAGLE GIST Mix DURCH OUILITT Wt%E WIN= PURCH QUALITY YTYE WINE DISC ED PHILLI'S LIQ PUR:H ED PILLLIPS LIO DISC ED PiILLIPS WIN_ PUCH ED P41LLIPS YIN: 3ISC E) P41LLIPS MITI PUR:H FU%D 01 TOTAL FUND 13 TOTAL FUND 41 TOTAL FU%j 45 TOTAL FUND 71 TOTAL FUND 72 TOTAL FUND 13 TOTAL FUND 74 TOTAL TOTAL SsN=RAL FUNS CON" DEY:L 8L;CK iRANT F PERM IN24OVE REV3LVI%G F 1985 SP=C ASSESSMENT FUM LIQUOR OPERATIM6 FUND WATER 30ERATIAG FJND OP_RATINi FJN3 &DLF COJRSE 3oERATIN: F.' C6-23-86 PAGE 10 ACC3J%T NO- IhV. / P.J. A MESSAu_ ►1-♦811-514-➢5 MANUAL 71-4812-51•-95 MANUAL 71-4e13-514-itS MANUAL T1-4420-514-95 MANUAL I1-4v12-�1•-'i5 MANUAL 71-4813-514-91 MANuAL 71-4e10-514-9b MANUAL 71-4111-514-45 MANUAL 71-ie12-S1�-y5 MANUAL 71-481]-514-'i9 MANUAL 71-4220-514-95 MANUAL ••*-CKS PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO C'-c-)c.t 11 (:7: , I MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 1 i - ? 9 r �• L 1c, J,,Ll i w , • / a I z-ewc .2 .2`/ -7 u PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO (OZZ MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FCk OUR CITi RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) - /, Lo.c Ae'r,"y"a- kA' --a L 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 1E +e.,otvo% s allLn Ct 1 I& JUy 2 3 1986 (CITY OF ORONO City of Long Lake P. O. BOX L LONG LAKE, MINN. 55356 June 3, 1986 Mark Bernhardson City Admini3trator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn 55323 Subject: VanEeckhout Building Corporation Property - 650 North Brown Road Dear Mr. Bernhardson, Your letter of May 21, 1986 was discussed at the June 3, 1986 Council Meeting. The City Council has again denied the request of the City of Orono to permit VanEeckhout Corp_. to hook up directly to the Long Lake sewer line. The City Council decided that a new contract between Orono and Long Lake should be discussed before any new hook-ups are granted. Should you have any questions, or comments, please feel free to contact either the Mayor or myself. Sincerely, / LuVerne Hanson City Clerk c:. Long Lake Mayor & Councilmembers JUN I ! 19W I Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission 443 OAK STRE-El • EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331 • (612) 474 F R `_ �' _u J ? 1%6 TO: LMCCC EXECUTIVE CWIITTEE FROM: HOLLY HANSEN RE: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATE: JUNE 11, 1986 There will be a meeting of the LMCCC Executive Committee on Tuesday, June 17th at 5:00 p.m. The meeting w 1 take place at the Community TV Studio in Excel- sior. If you ar unable to attend this meeting, please contact me by noon on the day of the meeting. F we are unable to reach a quorum I will contact you for F=_ )oses of cancelling the meeting. Sincerely, Holly Hansen Administrator LMCCC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday, June 17, 1986 5:00 PM Excelsior TV Studio I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL 0 'NUTES III. REPORTS A. Officers B. Administrator C. D,w-Sat IV. PERFORMANCE BOND REDUCTION REQUEST V. LMCCC FINANCIAL AUDIT VI. NFLCP CON ERENLE VII. UNFINISHED BUKII SS VIII. NEW BUSINESS IX. InJOui MINUTES LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS FULL COMMISSION MEETIt,G 5 : 00 PH EXCELSIOR W cm:I^:O _ I . CALL TO ORDER TUESDA - :: 11186 Chairman Olds called the meet-Aiig to order ROLL CALL Lesley Hughes Seamans...Tonka Bay Peter berzins........... Minnetrista Tom Andergon............ Medina Marietta Jacobse,; ....... Greenwood David G. Stahr.......... Excelsior Jim Swartwood ........... Long Lake Betsy Swartwood ......... Long Lake Dean Johnson ............ Shorewood Jerry Schmieg........... Victoria Mark J. Ayotte...... Legal Counsel COMMISSION at 5:15 PM. Jim Olds ...... Excelsi�•r Jerry Roehl ... iedina Tad Shaw...... Shorewood Doug Keller ... Tonka Bay Tore Frahm..... Orono Pillis.... Greenwood Knyne.... Mtka. Beach ^;... Adams..... Orono Mary Smit...... Dow -Sat Holly HanL_n..Administrator II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion 5.20.86.1 Swartwood moved, Frahm seconded, to approve the Executive meeting minutes of April 15, 1986 as written.. Motion carried unanimously. III. REPORTS A. Administrator Bills - Motion 5.20.86.2 Anderson moved, Swartwood approve payment of the following bills: NorthwesternBell ................................ AT&T ............................................. O'Connor & Hannan ................................ NFLCP (3 Copyright bookl ts)..................... Sue Niccum (April minutes) ....................... PettyCash ....................................... U.S. Postmaster..... ..... ..................... NFLCP Conference Registration ....... ............ Sheraton -Palace Hotel (NFLCP ConferE.ice) ......... ConferenceTravel ................................ Total Motion carried unanimously. seconded, to $ 56.86 6.07 244.88 12.00 50.00 100.00 22.00 205.00 214.01 228.00 $ 1,138.82 Recommendation Administrator Hansen recommended the ;purchase of a two drawer filing cabinet and pendaflex filing system for $114.70. Peter Berzins will check into the purchase of filing equipment. Lake Minnetonka News Program The "Lake Minnetonka News" will be a regular program and will be shown on the 3rd Thursday of ever, - month. Classes Spring Classes are finished and Summer classes will beqin on June 9th. N. Dow -Sat Mary Smith cave the fu.-1 committee copies of the Dow -Sat report showing subscriber act„ ity broken down by communities. She re- viewed new connections vs. non -pays. Pending installations are rather hiqh right now due to the `-ct that people were waiting for the ground to thaw so cables can L laid underground, the people did not want temporary above ground connections. These people will he contacted again. LMccc M1Nwreb TUESDAY, MAY 20, 1986 page two B. Dow -Sat continued Mary reviewed their marketing plans for the committee. She said their best bet is door to door contact. Twenty months ago they served 3000 subsc=iberc, now there are 14,000 sut,cribers. In the metro area alone they are doing 80-100 installations a week, with a 50% penetration overall. Regarding the Teu,:nical, a "proof of performance" test was done by an outside Agency. Signed affidavits are on file in the Mound office to show that the Lake Minnetonka Cable System exceeded FCC requirements. Two minor problems were corrected. Two letters were received, one from the mayor of Victoria, request- ing line extensions. An engineer was sent out to check on the situation, and Dow -Sat will respond to Victoria by the end of the week. The cost factor has to be taken into consideration but -Dow - Sat is trying to work with prospective c-ustome-s to work things out. C. Legal Council o projects pending. Ili". ELECTION OF OFFICERS TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Mr. Jinn Hillis, Chairman of the Nominating Committee, explained that continuity, geographical representation, size, and new user group people were some of the criteria used to make their decisions. He presented their recommendations: Jim Olds Dennis Haggert,, Tom Anderson Frank de Monchaux Tim Adams Lesley Hughes Seamans Dean Johnson Jim Hillis President Vice President Secretary Treasurer Officer Officer Officer Alternate Motion 5.20.86.3 Swartwood moved, Schmieg seconded, to cast a unanimous ballot for officers recommenced by the nominating com- mittee. Motion carried unanimously. President Olds welcomed the new officers. He also reminded those present that the Executive Committee was formed to create an expedient way to conduct business and be sure of a quorum. There will be 4 full Commission meetings a year, but everyone is i,iformed of all Executive meetings and are welcome to attend them if they desire to do so. V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Equipment Olds said several meetings have been held with Frank de Monchaux, Holly Hansen, Ma-1 Smith and himself regarding- the equipment sit- uation per the Franchise Agreement. The equipment required in the original franchise h: changed due to changes in technology. The cost is approxima-el} f'5.700 for equipment for the Excelsior and Orono studios :n(. a letter he<E been sent to Mary establishing what LMCCC feels is necessary to complete the equipment/facilities part of the Franchise Agreement. TUESDAY, MAY 20, 1986 page three V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - continued Technical Audit The third year of the Franchise LMCCC is required to conduct a Technical Audit. Dow-Sat's information will provide additional information for comparison purposes at that time. Annual Final Audit Motion 5.20.86.4 Schmieg moved, Stahr seconded, to direct the Administrator to seek a certified accountant to perform the Audit. Motion carried unanimously. VI. OLD BUSINESS None VII. ADJOURMENT Motion 5.20.86.5 Adams moved, Swartwood seconded, to adjourn at 6:00 PM. Motion carried unanimously. A ONE CRIME INDEX OFFENSE EVERY 8 MINUTES CRIME CLOCK 1985 ONE VIOLENT CRIME EVERY 1 1/2 HOURS ONE PROPERTY CRIME EVERY 9 MINUTES ONE MURDER EVERY 265 HOURS (11 Days) ONE FORCIBLE RAPE EVERY 17 HOURS ONE ROBBERY EVERY 3 HOURS ONE AGGRAVATED ASSAULT EVERY 3 HOURS ONE BURGLARY EVERY 33 MINUTES ONE LARCENY -THEFT EVERY 14 MINUTES ONE MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT EVERY 2 HOURS ONE ARSON EVERY 21 HOURS The Crime Clock shu,id be viewed with care. Being the most aggregate representation of UCR data. it is designed to convey the annual reported crime experience by showing the relative frequency of occurrence of the Index offenses. This mode of display shculd not be taken to imply a regularity in the commission of the Part I offenses; rather, it represents the annual ratio of crime to fixed time intervals. V a TABLE 2.2 CRIME INDEX AND POPULATION RANKINGS HENNEPIN COUNTY 1985 Percent Of Crime Percent Of Population Crime Crime index Crime Rate Municipality Population Population Rank Index Total Rate Rank Bloomington 83.827 8.69% 2 3.541 5.47% 4.224 14 Brooklyn Center 31.767 3.29% 9 1.882 2.91% 5.924 4 Brooklyn Pa-1 46.811 4.85% 3 2.301 3.55% 4.915 8 Champlin 9,697 1.01% 18 428 .66% 4.416 12 Corcoran 4.481 .46% 23 19 .031 424 33 Crystal 25.184 2.61% 10 983 1.52% 3,903 17 Dayton 4.363 .45% 26 61 .09% 1.398 32 Deephaven/Woodland 4,429 .46% 25 82 .13% 1.851 31 Eden Prairie 19.070 1.98% 14 965 1.49% 5,060 7 Edina 46.029 4.77% 4 1.678 2.595 3.645 21 Golden Valley 22.819 2.36% 13 932 1.44% 4.084 15 Hopkins 14.892 1.54% 15 859 1.33% 5.768 5 Long take 1.855 .19% 31 73 .11% 3.935 16 Maple Grove 24.586 2.55% 11 595 .92% 2.420 30 Medina 2,702 .28% 30 72 .11% 2.664 26 Minneapolis 370.866 38.43% 1 38.247 59.06% 10.240 1 Minnetonka 40.759 4.22% 6 1,922 2.97% 4.715 10 Minneton b Beach 531 .06% 33 23 .04% 4,331 13 Minnetrista/St. Bonifacius 4,445 .46% 24 108 .17% 2.429 29 Mound 9.505 .99% 19 348 .54% 3,661 20 Her Hope 23,430 2.43% 12 666 1.03% 2.842 24 Orono 6,897 .71% 21 19S .30% 2.827 25 Osseo 2,819 .29% 29 155 .24% 5.498 it Plymouth 36,774 3.81% 8 1.284 1.98% 3.491 23 Richfield 37.372 3.87% 7 1,440 2.22% 3.653 18 Robbinsdale 14.295 1.48% 16 686 1.06% 4.798 9 St. Anthony 7,807 .81% 20 300 .46% 3.842 19 St. Louis Park 43.151 4.47% 5 2.027 3.13% 4,697 11 South Lake Minnetonka 9.866 1.02% 17 349 .54% 3,S37 22 Spring "►rk 1.446 .15% 32 119 .I81 8,229 2 Wayzata 3,377 .35% 28 210 .32% 6,218 3 West Hennepin 4.009 .42% 27 101 .16% 2.519 28 Hennepin County Sheriff 5.184 .54% 22 131 .20% 2.527 27 U of M - - - 1.518 2.34% - - Mctropolitan Airport - - - 459 .71% - • TOTAL 965,040 100.00% - 64.759 100.00% 6.710 - r v . TABLE 2.3 TOTAL OFFENSES, CLEARANCES, AND ARRESTS BY MUNICIPALITY HENNEPIN COUNTY 1985 Crime Crime TOTAL TOTAL Index Index index Part If Part II Part 11 CRIMES CRIMES TOTAL Municipality Offenses Clearances Arrests Offenses Clearances Arrests REPORTED CLEARED ARRESTS Bloomington 3,541 785 748 2,935 1.748 2.070 6,476 2.533 2,818 Brooklyn Center 1.882 474 490 1.616 691 659 3,498 1.155 1,149 Grooklyn Park 2.301 525 432 3,506 2.186 2,202 5.807 2,711 2.634 Champlin 428 90 G9 684 326 200 1,112 416 269 Corcoran 19 1 0 45 43 43 64 44 43 Crystal 983 304 297 1,369 997 952 2.352 1,301 1,249 Dayton 61 2 2 380 25 25 441 27 27 Deephaven/Woodland 82 6 4 120 78 99 202 84 103 Eden Prairie 965 314 250 1,424 712 396 2,389 1.026 646 Edina 1,678 497 490 1,251 747 1.131 2.929 1,244 1,621 Golden Valley 932 167 121 1.055 577 452 1.987 744 573 Hopkins £59 153 115 1,197 674 501 2.056 827 616 Long leke 73 15 S 142 68 27 215 83 33 Maple Grove 595 82 5 815 222 E2 1.410 304 67 Medina 72 11 8 335 271 141 407 282 149 Minneapolis 38.247 6,604 7.024 21.022 10.257 22,914 59.269 16,861 29,93q Minnetonka 1,922 494 335 1,640 523 585 3,562 1.017 920 Minnetonka Beach 93 2 0 20 8 4 43 10 4 Minnetrista/St. Bonifacius 16 16 221 93 64 329 109 80 Mound 348 73 64 596 332 238 944 405 302 New Hope 666 175 136 1,182 904 892 1,848 1,079 1.028 Orono 195 29 6 399 2D4 105 594 233 111 Osseo 155 7 10 207 55 6.i 362 62 73 Plymouth 1,284 227 194 1,497 893 845 2,781 1.120 1.039 Richfield 1,440 202 75 1.276 665 372 2,716 B67 447 Robbinsdale GR6 150 167 790 474 522 1,476 624 689 St. Anthony 300 . 0 0 211 0 4 511 0 4 St. Louis Nark 2,027 330 302 2,244 1.374 1,296 4.271 1.704 1.598 South Lake Minnetonka 349 74 64 864 741 761 1,213 815 825 Spring Park 119 38 1S 135 73 18 ?54 111 33 Wayzata 210 37 20 276 98 106 496 135 126 West Hennepin 101 28 16 406 314 289 507 342 305 Hennepin County Sheriff 131 17 0 423 234 64 554 251 64 U of M 1,516 71 60 556 113 108 2.074 184 168 Metropolitan Airport 459 134 19 213 55 27 672 189 46 TOTAL 64.759 12,134 11.560 51.052 26.765 38.237 115,811 38,899 49.797 TABLE 2.4 CRIME INDEX OFFENSES AND CLEARANCES BY MUNICIPALITY HENNEPiN COUNTY 1985 Motor TOTAL Aggravated Vehicle INDEX CLEARANCES Municipality Murder Rape Robbery Assault Burglary Larceny Theft Arson CRIMES NUMBER PERCENT Bloomington - 8 26 56 495 2.725 214 17 3.541 785 22% Brooklyn Center - 5 25 20 412 1.257 160 3 1,882 474 251 Brooklyn Park 1 14 25 69 663 1.369 143 17 2.301 525 22% Champlin - 1 - 7 118 279 20 3 428 90 21% Corcoran - - - - 4 13 1 1 19 1 5% Crystal - 5 14 9 219 681 46 9 983 304 30% Dayton - - - 3 15 39 4 - 61 2 3% Deephaven/Woodland - - - - ?7 53 2 - 82 6 7% Eden Prairie - 3 - 8 127 775 .49 3 965 314 32% Edina - 6 16 17 273 1.279 77 10 1,678 497 29T Golden Valley - 6 10 16 249 58D 58 13 932 167 lit Hopkins - - 9 13 153 589 92 3 859 153 17% Long Lake - - I 1 18 48 4 1 73 15 20% Maple Grove - 1 2 7 113 438 34 - 595 82 13% Medina - 1 - - 12 49 8 2 72 11 15% Minneapolis 29 419 2.32u 2.361 10,983 i8,448 3,411 270 38.247 6.604 17% Minnetonka - 3 7 16 '.a/ 1.314 83 12 1,922 494 ZSt Minnetonka leach - - - - 2 21 - - 23 2 81 Minnetrista/St. Bonifacius - - 1 1 36 57 8 5 108 16 14% Mound - - 2 17 83 215 29 2 348 73 20% New Hope - 4 11 10 114 490 31 6 666 175 26% Orono - - - 2 52 129 12 - 195 29 14% Osseo - - 3 4 21 116 11 - 155 7 4% Plymouth - 2 6 17 245 939 67 8 1.284 227 17% Richfield - 10 19• 10 317 991 87 6 1.440 202 14% Robbinsdale 2 2 10 9 191 433 30 9 686 150 21% St. Anthony - 1 3 2 84 195 1<< 1 300 - - St. Louis Park 6 18 18 389 1.446 142 8 2.027 330 16% South Lake Minnetonka 1 3 3 4 93 226 17 2 349 74 21% Spring Park - - - 2 15 69 13 119 38 31% Wayzata - - 2 4 28 162 13 1 210 37 17% West Hennepin - 1 - - 24 64 12 - 101 28 271 Hennepin County Sheriff - 2 2 4 26 76 17 4 131 17 12t U of M - 5 5 2 47 1,457 1 1 I.SIR 71 4Z Metropolitan Airport - - - 4 - 355 100 - 459 134 29% TOTAL 33 508 2.546 2,713 16.135 37.397 5.010 417 64.759 12.134 19% TABLE 2.9 ACTUAL MURDER OFFENSES, CLEARANCES AND CRIME RATES BY MUNICIPALITY IN HENNEPIN COUNTY 1985 Total Offerses Total Cleared By Arrest Municipality Actual Offenses Crime Rate Number Percent Bloomington - - - - Brooklyn Center - - - - Brooklyn Park 1 2 1 100% Champlin - - - - Corcoran - - - - Crystal - - - - Dayton - - - - Deephaven/Woodland - - - - Eden Prairie - - - - Edina - - - - Golden Valley - - - - Hopkins - - - - Long Lake - - - - Maple Grove - - - - Medina - - - - Minneapolis 29 7 11 37% Minnetonka - - - - Minnetonka Beach - - - - Minnetrista/St. Bonifacius - - - - Mound - - - New Hope - - - - Orono - - - - Osseo - - - - Plymouth - - - - Richfield - - - - Robbinsdale 2 13 2 100% St. Anthony - - - - St. Louis Park - - - - South Lake Minnetonka 1 10 1 100% Spring Park - - - - Wayzata - - - West Hennepin - - - - Hennepin County Sheriff - - - - U of M - - - - Mctropolitan Airport - - - - TOTAL 33 3 15 45% 27 TABLE 2.12 ACTUAL Rt..c OFFENSES, CLEARANCES AND CRIME RATES BY MUNICIPALITY IN HENNEPIN COUNTY 1985 Municipality Total Actual Offenses Crime Rate Total Cleared Number Offenses By Arrest Percent Bloomington 8 9 6 75% Brooklyn Center 5 15 2 40% Brooklyn Park 14 29 6 42% Champlin 1 10 1 100% Corcoran - - - - Crystal 5 19 2 40% Dayton - - - - Deephaven/Woodland - - - - Eden Prairie 3 15 3 100% Edina 6 13 2 33% Golden Valley 6 26 4 66% Hopkins - - - - Long Lake - - - - Maple Grove 4 1 100% Medina i 37 1 100% Minneapolis 419 112 88 21% -innetonka 3 7 1 33% .'nnetonka Beach - - - - Minnetrista/St. Bonifacius - - - - Mound - - - - New Hope 4 17 4 100% Orono - - - - Osseo - - - Plymouth 2 5 Richfield 10 26 8 80% •. Robbinsdale 2 13 2 100% St. Anthony 1 12 - - St. Louis Park 6 13 2 33% South Lake Minnetonka 3 30 3 100% Spring Perk - - - Wayzata - - - - West Hennepin 1 24 1 100% Hennepin County Sheriff 2 38 U of M 5 - 3 60% Metropolitan Airport - - - - TOTAL 508 52 140 27% 34 TABLE 2.15 ACTUAL ROBL..►tY OFFENSES, CLEARANCES AND CRIME RATES BY MUNICIPALITY IN HENNEPIN COUNTY 1985 Municipality Bloomington Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Park C amplin (.jrcoran Crys`i1 Dayton Deephaven/Woodland Eden Prairie Edina Golden Valley Hopkins Long Lake. Maple Grove Medina Minneapolic, Mir "a MiF. Beach Minn. /St. Bonifacius Mound New lo, Orono Osseo Pi ymo u t h Richfield Robbinsdalr St. Anthony St. Louis Park South Lake Minnetonka Spring Park Wayzata West Hennepin Hennepin County Sheriff UofM Metropolitan Airport TOTAL Total Offenses Total Cleared By Arrest Actual Offenses Crime Rate Number Percent 26 31 11 42% 25 78 9 36% 25 53 12 48% 14 55 7 50% 16 5 31% 10 2 20% 9 6U 3 33% 1 53 1 10O% 2 8 1 50% 2,326 627 306 13% 7 17 - - 1 22 - - 2 21 1 50% 11 46 6 54% 3 106 1 33% 6 16 2 331 19 50 2 10": 10 69 7 70% 3 38 - - 18 41 5 27% 3 30 2 66% 2 59 1 50% 2 38 - - 5 - - - 2,546 261 384 151.1 41 TABLE 2.18 ACTUAL AGGRAVATED ASSAULT OFFENSES, CLEARANCES "Nr) CRIME RATES BY MUNICIPALITY IN HENNEPIN 'OUNTY 1_ Total Offenses Total Cleared By Arrest Municipality Actual Offenses Crime Rate Number Percent Bloomington 56 Li 45 80% Brooklyn Center 20 62 18 9U% Brooklyn Park 69 147 48 69% Champlin 7 72 7 100% Corcoran - - - - Crystal 9 3r 8 88% Dayton 3 L - - Deephaven/Woodl. - Eden R-airie 6 41 5 52% Edina 17 36 9 52% Golden Valley 16 70 13 81% Hopki •is 13 87 8 61% Long lake 1 53 1 100% Maple Grove 7 28 6 85% Medina - - - - Minneapolis 2.,361 636 11108 46% Minnetonka 16 39 7 43% Minnetonka Beach - - - - Minnetrista/St. Bonifaciuz, 1 22 1 100% Found 17 178 12 70% New Hope 10 42 7 70% Orono 2 2 100% Osseo 4 141 1 25% Plymouth 17 46 13 76% Richfield 10 26 6 60% Robbinsdale 9 62 5 55% St. Anthony 2 25 - - St. Louis Pai k 18 41 13 72% South Lake Minnetonka 4 40 3 75% Spring Park 2 138 2 100% Wayzata 4 118 3 75% West Hennepin - - - - Hennepin County Sheriff 4 77 1 25% U of M 2 - 50% Metropolitan Airport 4 - 2 50% TOTAL 2,713 281 1,355 492 TABLE 2.21 ACTUAL BURGLARY OFFENSES, CLEARA""�S AND CRIME RATES I MUNICIPALITY .IN HEV4EP!l;i COUNTi 1985 I — - Municipality Bloomington Brooklyn C tc Brooklyn Pa Champi in Co rcora n Crystal Nyton Deephaven/Woodland Eden Prairie Edina .;o.den Valley Hopkins Long Lai ke M, le Grove Meoina Minnea�..;l is Kil;net- Bea-h Minnetrirt.a/St. Boriracius Mound New Hope Orono Osseo P1 ymou' Rie- hfieid i R_ obi nsdz St. Anthony ! St. : is Pa r'- Spring i. "k ' vza to 4,•_ hennepin Hennepin Coonty She: rt UofM N-trop. n Ai ri`,.,rt ,GTAL Total Actual 0ffenses 495 412 6 ti 3 118 4 219 15 27 127 273 249 1� 18 113 10,983 48, 2 36 83 t, Crime Rate 5° 1 ?�o 1,'16 1,217 83 863 3 '9 ,65 F 93 1,091 027 971 4S 44 2,961 194 r S 4 75J 44 566 848 '3E Total nf fenses Cleared By Arrest Number Percent 80 46 82 14 26 12 36 to 3 21 7 42 0 41 3 10 30 6 2 18 40 15 15 1,037 s 28 Fs-'S 6 7 ^� 501 6 4i - 5 i,6 '6% :lx 127 11% 6% 8% 12% 26% 11% 9% 7% 12% 7% 7% 26% 20% 21% 25x 23% 10% TABLE 2.24 ACTUAL LARCENY OFFENSES, CLEARANCES AND CRIME RATES BY MUNICIPALITY IN HENNEPI" COUNTY 1985 Total Total Cleared Municipality Actual Offenses Crime Rate Number Offenses By Arrest Percent Bloomington 2,725 31160 582 21% Brooklyn Center 1,257 3,956 374 29% Brooklyn Park 1,369 2,924 332 24% Champlin 279 2,878 65 23% Corcoran 13 290 1 7'' Crystal 681 2,704 248 3. Dayton 39 893 2 5a Deephaven/Woo id 33 1,196 4 7% Eden Prairie /75 4,063 35% Edina I,279 2,778 Golden Valley 580 2,541 'x Hopkins 589 3,955 Long Lake 48 2,587 7 14% Manle n-ve 438 1,781 48 10% ine. 49 1,813 5 10% iea J s 18,448 4,974 4,040 21% netonka 1,314 3,223 429 32% netonka Beach 21 3,954 2 ^% Ninnetrisfa/St. Bonifacius 57 1,282 8 14% Mound 215 2,261 40 18% New Hope 490 2,091 113 23% Orono 129 1,870 16 12% ._seo 116 4,114 3 2% (Plymouth 939 2,553 165 17% Richfield 991 2,651 115 .:S Robbinsdale 433 3,029 108 24% St. Anthony 195 2,497 - - St. Louis Park 1,446 3,351 275 19% South Lake Minnetonka ; 2,-'90 35 lix Spring Parr 89 fj,I`A 26 Wayzata 1621 4,iq/ 21 1?% West Hennepin 64 1,596 :5 23% Hennepin County Sheriff 76 1,466 11% '! of M 1,457 - 61 4% Metropolitan Airport J5, - 68 19% TOTAL 37,397 3,875 8.117 21% 62 TABLE 2.27 ACTUAL MOTO^ VEHICLE THEFT OFFENSES, CLEARANCES AND CRIME RATES BY MUNICIPALITY IN, HENNEPIN COUNTY 1985 Total Offenses Total Cleared By Arrest Municipality Actual Offenses Crime Rate Number Percent Bloomington 214 255 58 27% Brooklyn Center 160 503 24 15% Brooklyn Park 143 305 43 30% Champlin 20 206 3 15% Corcoran 1 22 - - Crystal 46 182 11 23% Dayton 4 91 - - Deephaven/Woudland 2 45 2 100% Eden Prairie 49 256 20 40% Edina 77 167 12 15% Golden Valley 5E 254 20 34% Hopkins 92 617 12 13% Long lake 4 215 2 50% Maple Grove 34 138 5 14% Medina 8 296 5 62% Minneapolis 3,411 919 279 8% Minnetonka 83 203 15 18% Minnetonka Beach - - - Minnetristo/St. Bonifacius 8 179 3 3. Mound 29 305 9 31., New Hope 31 132 13 41% Orono 12 173 5 41% Osseo 11 390 - - -Plymouth 67 182 •26 38% Richfield 87 132 30 34% Robbinsdale 30 [09 8 26% St. Anthony 14 179 - - St. Louis Park 142 329 7 4% South Lake 'nnetonka 17 172 4 23% Spring Par, 13 899 7 53% Wayzata 13 384 6 46% West Hennepin 12 299 5 41% Hennepin County Sheriff 17 327 - - Uof11 1 - 1 100% Metropolitan Airport 100 - 64 64% TOTAL 5,010 519 0,99 13% C5 7 TABLE 2.30 ACTUAL ARSON OFFENSES, CLEARANCES AND CRIME RATES BY MUNICIPALITY IN HENNEPIN COUNTY 1985 Municipality Total Actual Offenses Crime Rete Total Cleared Number Offenses By Arrest Percent Bloomington 17 20 3 17% Brooklyn Center 3 9 1 33% Brooklyn Park 17 36 1 5% Champlin 3 30 - - Corcoran 1 22 - - Crystal 9 35 2 22% Dayton - - - - Deephaven/Woodland - - - - Eden Prairie 3 15 2 66% Edina 10 21 3 30% Golden Valley 13 56 2 15% Hopkins 3 20 2 66% ;ion take 1 53 1 1O0% Maple Grove - - - - Medina 2 74 - - Minneapolis 270 73 52 19% Minnetonka 12 29 1 8% Minnetonka Beach - - - - Minnetrista/St. Bonifacius 5 112 1 20% Mound 2 21 1 50% New Hope 6 25 2 33% Orono - - - - .Qsseo - - - - Plymouth 8 21 3 37% Richfield 6 16 1 16% Robbinsdale 9 62 3 33% St. Anthony 1 12 - - St. Louis Park 8 18 - - South Lake Minnetonka 2 20 1 50% Spring Park - - - - Wayzata 1 29 - - West Hennepin - - - - Hennepin County Sheriff 4 77 1 25% U of M 1 - - - Mr olitan Airport - - - - T 417 43 83 20% X v TABLE 3.1 w 11 CRIMES BY RPRCIWITY ffER PIP COWY 1985 I other i 51prIe Wez- Dlvstf- Other Fawily/ Liww Dls- fa- (Excluding) CLEAPAPETS �'1r�c+o�iity Assault Forvery Fraud zlorrrt koperty dal ism M*mm tutfon 9,x thrcotics Gm61ing O+ildren Dil Laws 0derly grancy Traffic) MAL XPT9 R PEWPr Btorrington 333 110 181 - 29 932 15 Se 91 70 - 10_ SOR 33 379 - 186 2."- 1.748 ST. Rr.7liy" Ce"ter 714 143 225 - 6 461 6 - 49 39 - 57 150 6 1 - 129 1.615 691 4111 Av'llyn illrk 675 51 I66 - 17 777 51 1 9R 162 - 33 620 60 344 - 401 3.5% 2.1A6 621 '�lin 101 6 169 I - 206 6 14 6 - 4 44 10 67 - 50 6w► 32S 411 i rtv�an - - 1 - - 2 - - - 2 - - 40 - - - - 45 43 951 ystol 126 YK 67 - 6 248 4 3 20 21 - 2 6R1 13 1% - 36 1.359 9Q7 77% 0+ytm 16 - 4 - 1 65 71 - 3 - - 3 25 3 47 - 142 3f10 25 61 1-4wWenAbvilsnd 4 1 5 - 1 33 2 - 4 5 - - 21 16 13 - 15 120 7R 65% Ftk►. "irie Qi R9 236 - 4 3n7 - - 26 25 - 36 275 9 289 - 30 1.4a 712 5T- F1"na SS 65 91 - 15 359 3 - 25 2R - 1 476 4 72 - S7 1,251 747 57 N't- villey 1116 110 81 - 21 257 5 - 23 29 1 8 230 9 99 - 66 1.M5 S77 5a1E itTj ins I41 29 89 2 3 261 6 - 21 14 1 40 251 40 111 - 188 LIT 674 561E ta"g We 17 9 12 - 1 35 1 - S 3 - 1 19 4 27 - a 142 69 47r ovo 50 R 61 - 1 335 1 - 26 6 - 26 92 9 1R6 - 14 615 222 771 'Mina 5 2 157 - - 33 - - - 3 - - 134 - 1 - - 335 271 PT "i�mlis 6.273 S% 129 2 165 7.432 460 541 658 6M 10 23 2.GV 8 413 - 990 21.022 10.257 4W- »; �++r'v�%a I4tl 93 145 - 11 394 17 - 70 80 - 22 291 46 152 - I14 1.640 523 31 % ORM" rali bdl 1 - - - - B - - - - - - 4 - 5 2 20 8 JIM Pir..trista/St. flonifacius 19 4 36 - 1 49 8 - 4 3 - 1 25 6 35 - 30 271 93 42; 11+rd 94 9 41 - 2 IS4 5 22 5 - 17 102 4 92 - 49 516 332 551. 'law foe 84 19 39 - 2 291 8 - 22 9 - 14 552 6 69 - 67 1.IR2 904 76Z 0ve 21 7 12 - 1 120 9 - S 15 - 7 K S S9 - 46 399 2rd S1[ ev 13 4 9 - 1 70 1 - 1 4 - 1 46 24 19 - 14 207 55 2f1 P. w-rutn 113 21 179 - 7 433 3 - 32 41 - 8 412 4 175 - 70 1,477 893 59W. ^'cMield 170 n 60 - 9 341 2 25 57 ?R - 49 231 - 186 - 39 1.P6 665 521 Rkftlms&le 51 32 72 - 5 153 5 - 10 14 - In 341 1 43 - S2 790 474 6M 't.11*ttio"y 16 15 14 - - 73 2 2 8 1 1 56 - 12 - 11 211 - - �t, touts ter# 243 103 105 - 19 472 23 - 69 106 2 24 691 37 191 - 169 2.744 1.374 6]1 :f t la he Mimrtonla a5 20 24 - 5 f 12 - 11 36 - 15 159 244 71 - 134 954 741 MT W"q %A 13 a 3S 1 - 2 1 1 16 4 14 12 13S 73 Sa% uhyats 13 16 65 - - 60 3 - 4 13 - 1 SS 9 19 - 18 276 I" 351 *..;t 22 4 136 - 4 53 4 - 5 11 - 4 62 24 31 - 46 am 31a 77% !?Pb.rin Comty 9rriff 19 19 177 - 5 11 1 1 8 Bo 1 3 64 1 12 - 21 423 234 551 of n 60 B 31 - 4 778 1 - 34 7 - 3 - - 1C8 22 5% 113 2M �tmml itan Mrport 14 14 16 - 2 % 13 1 3 7 - - 2 - 29 - 6 213 55 251 "" k 9.443 1.6n 2.%9 5 349 1A.922 699 630 1.474 1.569 16 425 9.451 639 3.654 - 3.184 51.t62 26,765 Sft mow,, 199 3% 6% - 1% 299 1% 1% 31 3% - 11 199 1! 7f1 6% 100E • TIBLE 3.2 MT 11 CLEAPAlCES BY POICIPIILITY HMPIN COIMT 1985 Rnlcipality Simple E*ez- Ilkn- Pmst1- Assault Fwyery fraud zlsred Roperty del Igo Mapons tution Oder yes Faintly/ prrcotics 0lrm6ling aildrm MR Liquor taus Ois. ltk- orderly 9rwy Other ('mcIuding) Traffic) TOTAL Bloomington 2% 44 114 - 28 155 11 58 55 65 - 7 50b 26 251 139 1.748 Brooklyn Center m 49 46 - 6 49 4 - 28 35 - 12 ISO 6 64 - 107 681 Brooklyn fart 525 9 202 - 14 106 46 - 31 154 - 16 616 49 163 - 255 2.185 DwMi in 59 2 123 I - 32 5 - 6 5 - - 44 I 21 - 211 XS Corcoran - - i - - - - - 2 - 40 - - - 43 Crystal 102 13 19 - 4 44 4 3 14 20 - 1 671 6 64 - 32 997 Myto^ - - - - - - - - - - - - 25 - - - - 25 r1eowerAbodland 4 1 4 ! 6 2 - 2 5 - 21 IS 5 - 12 78 Edm ftalr4e 71 18 107 - 3 41 - - 11 22 - 17 275 8 125 - 14 712 Edina 34 31 64 - 14 25 3 - 4 28 - - 47S 4 29 - 36 747 0,ldm Wiley 96 33 32 - 21 32 4 - 8 24 1 S 230 5 42 - 44 '57 Rolm 81 S 39 1 3 18 3 - 5 10 - 9 249 33 48 - 170 674 Iw! tare 12 S 6 1 6 1 - 1 1 - - 19 3 12 1 68 pimple Orvm 22 3 18 - - 33 - - 10 4 - 8 87 7 22 - 8 222 pldina 3 1 123 - - 6 - - - 3 - 134 1 - 271 Mimnpolis 3.518 291 SO - 134 1.103 312 526 1TT 658 S 2 2.687 7 308 - 525 10.257 p i reetor'r 59 17 52 - 5 22 3 - 7 53 - 2 231 24 26 - 22 523 Nllilr•yr18 8011[r - - - - - 1 - - - - - 4 - 3 - - 8 Mimet►IsU/St.lionifaetus 11 - 16 - 1 4 8 - 2 2 - - 25 5 6 - 13 93 bard £t2 S 32 - 2 23 4 - 10 5 - 10 102 3 31 - 23 332 wo ltlpe 75 12 36 - 2 98 7 9 9 - 12 SSl 6 37 - 50 904 arm 12 S S - 1 10 6 - 1 13 - S R 4 26 24 2% Osseo 2 - - - - 1 - - - 3 - - 46 - 2 - 1 55 nynvuth 82 9 169 - 5 57 3 - 15 40 - 6 411 3 55 - 33 893 Richfield 117 9 41 - 9 39 2 25 22 22 - AIR 231 - 84 - 16 W, Abbbinsdale 31 8 10 - 5 11 4 - 3 9 - 2 341 1 21 - 28 474 St. Anhony - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - St. Louis Rkrk 158 46 52 - 14 47 9 - 44 99 2 8 671 32 69 - 123 1.374 South take Mmttonka 41 15 13 - 5 17 11 - 11 36 15 159 244 44 130 741 SUM/ Irk 6 3 19 - - 8 I 1 1 1 16 2 6 9 73 lbyata 3 3 6 - 4 1 - - 10 - - 5S 9 1 - 6 98 list 1blepin 21 1 124 - 4 8 3 5 11 - 3 62 24 10 - 38 3:4 *nWIn Canty Sheriff i2 8 47 - 1 2 1 - 4 71 - 2 64 3 - 19 234 U of M 36 3 23 - 1 7 1 4 3 - - - - 28 7 113 MetrumlItan Airyort 7 8 10 - 1 3 10 - 3 5 - - 2 - S - 1 55 TWAL 5.6% •660 1.603 2 • 285 2.017 470 612 443 1.428 8 191 9.292 533 1.612 - 1.913 M765 Nrcmt 211 $ 6% - 11 81 21 21 8 5% - 1% 35% 21 61 71 10m 0 TABLE 3.3 MU II ARRESTS BY "IC IPALITY MKPIN CONY 1985 44nicipality Slgple Bober- VAn- Plosti- Assault Fbnry Freud :lemt Property del Ism Mapons tution Other Sex Folly/ f6r .1cs Mabltng 0016nen OU1 Boor Ols- Ya- Ina 0^der•ly grancy Other (Excluding) Traffic) TOTAL Bloomington 212 49 115 - 106 100 31 76 31 153 - 1 514 39 379 - MA 2.070 Brooklyn Center 105 35 16 - 12 48 11 - 14 51 - ISO 15 79 - 123 659 Booklyn Rkrk 385 4 160 - 26 10r 57 - 21 179 - 1 693 91 1% - 293 2.2T CAe�plin 42 3 57 1 2 1. 2 - 2 6 - - 41 7 12 - 14 200 Corcoran - - - - - - - - - 3 - - 40 - - - - 43 Crystal 73 12 3 - 8 24 1 3 11 29 - 679 6 55 - 41 951 Dyton - - - - - - - - - - - 25 - - - 25 �weNlbodland 1 - 2 - 2 9 2 - 3 8 - - 22 37 5 - 8 99 Eden Prairie 34 14 3 - 3 12 - - IO 20 - 3 268 1 20 - 8 3% [dins 18 19 11 - 24 29 6 - 4 57 - 1 871 9 29 - 53 1.131 widen Ibiley 55 - 3 - 25 19 3 - !0 31 - 1 231 3 28 - 43 452 "kim 57 2 22 - 11 25 6 - 4 11 - - 226 35 35 - 67 501 tang tale 3 - 1 - - - - - - 1 - - 19 - 3 _ 27 ►taple G ve 1 _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - S6 _ 3 - 2 62 Pled 'no 2 - - - - - 1 - - 137 - 1 - - 141 r4meapolis 2.099 419 44 1 219 682 ", 617 153 792 8 1 2,688 2,446 1,874 - 10.528 22,9.4 m nnetanka 45 13 46 - 12 18 6 - 4 82 - - 253 42 25 - 39 5F5 Odra r[h - - - - - - - 4 4 Mfwetrista/St. 9onifaclus 3 - - - 2 2 4 - 1 5 - - 25 5 5 - 12 64 ibid 39 I1 - 4 23 I - 3 5 - 2 99 9 20 - 18 23B rtv ► " 56 2 2 - 4 144 6 - 2 17 - - 563 3 32 - 61 892 own 3 - - - - 3 - 5 - - 92 2 - - 105 Osseo 2 - - - - 2 - - - 5 - - 48 - 3 - 3 63 n yrouth 56 13 161 - 9 44 4 - 3 56 - 2 408 1 39 - 49 845 Richfield 24 1 1 - 14 9 2 36 4 19 - - 231 - 8 - 23 372 Rabbinsdale 28 6 6 - 6 IS 13 - 1 9 - 1 358 ' 30 - 45 522 St. k0my - - - - - - 1 - - - - 3 - - - - 4 St. Louis Rork 114 18 8 - 25 24 15 - 23 133 4 4 645 33 57 - 193 1.2% South idle Mirmtmb 14 6 3 - 14 14 13 - 8 54 - - 177 264 47 - 147 761 SRC Rat 2 - - - - - - - - - - 14 1 - 1 18 Wayzata 3 1 - - 2 1 1 - 1 it - - 58 12 - - 16 106 k>pst 111mrin 12 1 47 - 3 15 7 - 4 16 - 3 65 58 9 - 49 289 *Mwin Carty 9"Iff - - - _ - - - _ - _ - _ 64 - - - - 64 U of M 16 2 14 - 6 9 1 - 5 3 - - - - 36 - 16 108 14etra4ol i tan Al rport 3 2 3 - 2 7 2 - 3 - - - 1 - 4 - - 27 TOTAL 3.507 626 739 2 541 1,396 541 732 328 1.762 12 27 9.758 3,117 3,037 - 12.122 38,237 R rent 99 22 24 - is 34 1! 8 1% 5% - - 26% 181 0% - 32% 100E TABLE 3.4 TOTAL ARRESTS FOR PART II CRI14ES BY AGE HENNEPIN COUNTY 1985 UNDER 18 Number Percent 18 Number TO 24 Percent 25 AND Ni,mber OVER Percent TOTAL Simple Assault 594 17% 942 27% 1,971 56% 3,507 Forgery 121 19% 230 37% 275 44% 626 Fraud 43 5% 260 36% 436 59% 739 Embezzlement - - - - 2 100% 2 Stolen Property 210 39% 183 34% 148 27% 541 Vandalism 803 58% 279 20% 3041 22% 1,386 Weapons 188 35% 178 33% 175 32% 541 Prostitution 54 7% 348 48% 330 45% 732 Other Sex Offenses 108 33% 75 23% 145 44% 328 Narcotics 253 14% 838 48% 671 38% 1,762 Gambling 2 17% 1 8% 9 75% 12 Family/Children 6 22% 9 33% 12 45% 27 OUI 138 1% ',376 35% 6,244 64% 9,758 Liquor Laws 410 1"°' : , 6,46 46% 1,261 40% 3,117 Disorderly Conduct 414 1 11180 39% 1,443 48% 3,037 Vagrancy - - - - - - Other 1,524 13% 4,373 36% 6,225 51% 12,122 TOTAL 4,868 13% 13,718 36% 19;651 51% 38,237 all CHURCH OF STT. GEORGE 133 South Brown Road Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 473-1247 June 5, 1986 Chief Mel Kilbo Long Lake Police Department Long ' 'ce, MN 55356 Dear aief Kilbo: Since May 9th when the Orono police and medics assisted Alice Anderson, I have been meaning to convey a message of appreciation for the assistance given Alice. Harry Anderson and his family also wish to express their thanks and appreciation. , :.n I came on the scene, I was person- ally very impressed by the compassion and sensitivity dis- played by the police officers in attendance. Thank you and keep up the good work. Sincerely, "4_4'eV Rev. Richard J. Mahonev RJM/rk 6#t Le1-s Wj (Z 7- Xcu�-sd a 6QjGe, nlQeft so N ?6-2LI37 Board of Directors President James A. Scheibel St. PiaLl Vice President Robert D. Thistle Coon Rapids i DV association of metropoliian municipalities Past President June 16, 1986 Ronald J. Backes St.-ouis Park Mr. Mark Bernhardson, City Manager Directors City of Orono Mentor Addicks,jr. Box '6, Crystal Bay Minneapolis Crystal Bay, MN. 55323 Gary Bastian Dear Mark: Maplewood JUN 171986 �J Sharon SaylesBcl:--This is to acknowledge receipt of Orono's dues Minneapolis to the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities for the Robert J. Benke membership year. New Brignton I want to thank you for your continuing support of the Jonathan R.Ela„. Association. "lease convey our thanks to Mayor Butler Mound and the members of your city council. WalterRobbi sdale Again, our thanks, and please t.ontact the Association Robbinsda{e Office when we can be of assistance. Edward Fittpatric, Fridley Best Regards, Kevin rrazell Mendota Heights James Lacina Woodbury Jarr:es Miller Min. —inks Patricia H ,)yt -Neils Plymouth Neil W. ?etcrson Bloc, ington Eldon. Reinke Shakopee kob:rt S:.ndland St. Anthony Leslie C. Turnc Edina %laurcer '..rren St. P.I;,i Vern Peterson Executive Director VP /cw E.AoC;-4LIY.. Ju v"w VC. sl ws Ll : bJil MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278 HELD ON MAY 20, 1986 The regular meetinq of the School Board of Or,no independent School District No. 278 was held on Tuesday, May 20, 1986. Pre+ent: Dave McKown James Franklin James Seiter Don Anderson '''illiam Levering William Fenhclt Kii.a Crosby Lucie Taylor UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Jim Frarll , the minutes of the May 12, 1.86 meeting were app.oved as presented. Don Anderson informed the Board that at the Suburban West Conference's inr hi-', track meet that afternoon, the Oronc, 7th grade girls' team and tf :li grad boys' ':,gym had each taken first place. Also, the 8th grade girls placed second and :.ne 7th grade boys placed fourth. Mr. Anderson stated that these students should be congratulated for their efforts. Jim Franklin reported that AMSD has established an expenditure contrul task force on which he will serve. Recommendations will be made to the legislature by this task force in 1987. Mr. Seiter informed the Board of two additional staff trarefers: Jean Wright and Wanda Schoeneberger, special education teachers, will be working in the intermediate school next year. UPON MOTION by Jim Franklin, seconds Lucie Taylor, the report on the Assurance of Mastery Program will be on June 9th agenda. The ward asked questions of Dr. Kent Winter regarding PSAT/SAT score:; at Orono. Concerns were expressed regarding the percentage decrease in these test scc — and the variables that might contribute/caul.: this reduction. Toe Boar,"administration will continue to monitor these ..,t sc, and will study/analyze the f;uctuatic in the results. UPON MOTION Kitty Crosby, seconded by Jim Franklin, Gertie Corpe was namE-d the Food Service ManagE~ for Orono and the position of head cook at each level was established. The names of each head cook will be provided at the June meeting. UPON M 71JN by Lucie Taylor, seconded �y Don Anderson, the school lunch prices for 1986-87 were .ippr, ,ed es fu i lows: Orono School Lunch Pricey 1986-87 Grades 1-3 10 lunch i(-Kets S 8.50 single S .90 Gri•des 4-6 5 lunch tickets S 4.75 ingle $1.00 Grades 9-12 10 lunch tickets $10.00 single $1.10 Adult, 10 lunch tir'etc S16.00 single S1.60 Student milk --Chocolate 15t, white 15t Malted milk --6 oz., 25t R. :ed price tic -t (all grades) -- 40t Kindergarten --mil: nd/or juice b snack - $17.50 year or $8.75 semester UPON MOTION Taylor, secorded by Bill Levering, the Board approved the Volkmann rmi, n bid with the ?ells window for the window iode'ing at the middle school UPON MOTION 5y Kitty Crosby, :.ecnr.ded by Bill Levering, the Board acce, the Orono Principal Association Master Contract for 1986-88. UPON MOTION by Bill Levering, seconded by Lurie Taylor, the Board accept.-­d the Assistant to the Superintendent contract for 1986-88. UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded 'y Lucie Taylor, the Board accepted the transportation cc i,t for 1';6-81 with Hanus Company as fol' ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278 (1) Service Routes: TRANSPORTATION SERVICE/CURRENT COSTS & BID -- HANUS CO. (2) (3) (4) (5) No. Routes/ Cost Total Cost Days/Hrs. 1985-86 1985-86 1986-87 1) Regular Routes 15 (171 days X 15 = 2565) 2) Non -Public 1 Routes (171 days) 3) Vo-Tech 1 (171 days) 4) Kdgn. & Pre-Sch. 5 (162 days X 5 = 810) 5) Kdgn. (Van -Holy Name 1 & Highcroft) (171 days) 6) Handicapped Vans 4 (Incl. S. Sch). (800 hrs.) (4 hrs. basic) Handicapped Vans (1450 hrs.) (add'l 1 hr. chg.) Additional Charges: 1) Extra-Curr. (1654 hrs.) (Athletics & Field Trips) 2) Late Activity (688 runs) 3) Shared Time (480 hrs.) 4) Work Program (320 hrs.) 5) Extra charge H.S. routes only TOTAL COST (6) Cost 1986-87 $117.70 $301,901 $126.22 $323,754 117.70 20,127 126.22 21,584 64.90 11,098 70.06 11,980 29.43 23,838 31.76 25,726 16.50 2,822 17.81 3,045 _ 60.50 48,400 65.31 52,248 _ 9.00 7,250 9.25 13,413 16.50 27,291 18.40 30,434 29.43 20,248 _ 3i.'6 21,851 9.00 4,320 9.25 4,440 9.00 2,880 9.25 2,960 65.00 975 127_.06 1,906 * S476,950 S $_ 513,341 • 36,391 4 1 R9if An article will be written for the newspaper regarding the service/safety of the bussing system at Orono. UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Don Anderson, the board accepted the resignation of June Brandriet as Title I tutor. UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Don Anderson, the annual School Board Election returns as submitted by the Election Judges were approved as follows: James Franklin 374 Bob Gr'.mes 80 John wiaresh 300 ;iubert J. Rosch 279 Write-ins 2 Total votes cast were 564. WHEREUPON James Franklin and John Maresh were declared elected to Board mem- bership for three-year terms. UPON MOTION by Lucie Taylor, seconded by Kitty Crosby, the meeting was adjourned. Kathe r meP.-Crosby, Zlerk Approved: Dave McKown, Chairman Own .......... PF ---241 10 291 b�M q:z-�