HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-28-1986 Council PacketMINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 28, 1986
ATTENDANCE 7:00 PM
The Orono Council met on the above date with the
following members present: Mayor Butler, Councilmembers
Grabek, Frahm, Adams and Hammerel. The following
represented the City staff: City Administrator
Bernhardson, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson,
Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant
Zoning Administrator Gaffron and City Clerk Hallin.
City Attorney Blatz was also present.
CONSENT AGENDA*
It wes moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, to approve the Consent Agenda*.
Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES*
it was m( ed by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilme. -)er Hammerel, to approve the Minutes of the
April 14, 1986 Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 5, Na.t. n.
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
JoF11en Hurr was present and reported to the Council on
the Boating While Intoxicated (BWI) legislation that has
was inacted during the 1986 legislative sesseion and
also the LMCD's BWI ordinance. Hurr stated that the
LMCD is hoping that this legislation will encourage
safer boating on Lake Minnetonka. She also informed the
Council that the LMCD now has the authority of regulate
liquor licensing on Lake Minnetonka wi,ereas the Stare
previously has had this authority. They now rave the
authority to issue up to 14 liquor licenses on Lake
Minnetonka.
Representative Hurr stated that the proposed yacht club
owners have not presented any proposed plans to the LMCD
for Deering Island.
Councilmember Frahm asked if the LMCD was going to
express their opposing views to the DNR regarding the
Lake Minnetonka Task Force report. Hurr replied they
were intending to oppose the DNR.
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, to accept the report of the City
of Orono's LMCD representative. Ayes 5, Nays 0.
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS
There were no comments from the Planning Commission.
PUBLIC: COMMENTS
Randy Lukanen, 1085 South Brown Roa., asked the Council
why they had not informed the residents in the Crystal
Bay sewer project that there was grant money to be had
1
MINUTES OF THE RIOGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 28, 1986
PUBLIC COMMENTS continued
for the sewer assessment that would not have to be paid
back. He stated that he had not applied for the grant
when it was proposed because it was just delaying the
assessment, it was still going to be paid. He felt that
the residents should have been notified that there was
monies available to pay the assessments and there was no
pay back. He felt that more people would have appli_:d
for that program. Mayor Butler stated that the money
from HUD would have to be used to pay off the
assessments or the money would be lost. Councilmember
Frahm asked if there was any more money for the program.
City Administrator Bernhardson stated there was none.
He stated that the City staff was unaware that there
would be residents who would qualify for the grant but
ha(i not made application because of the pay back. There
might be funds available from CDBG in February 1987.
Mr. Gabriel. Jabbour, 780 Tonkawa Road, stated that he
has read and heard some remarks regarding the Council's
actions that were not favorable. At this time he wished
to let the Council know that there are residents who
feel the Council is doing an excellent job and wished to
thank the Council for their good work and encouraged
them to continue.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
#990 WARD FERREI.L*
3405 WATERTOWN ROAD
VARIANCE
#819 WILLIA14 MILLS*
200 LEAP STRRBT
FINAL SUBDIVISION
RESOLUTION #1984
Motion by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember
Hammerel. to direct staff to write a resolution of
denial, this resolution will be presented to the Council
at their May 12, 1986 Council meeting. Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Motion by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember
Hammerel, to adopt Resolution #1984 approving a final
subvidision for- William Mills. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
#998 MAUREEN S. BELLC)i1S*
265 BROWN ROAD SOUTH
FINAL. SUBDIVISION
RBSOLLTION # 1985
Motion by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember
Hammere1, to adopt Resrjlutioil #1985 approving a final
suh(livision for Maureen S. Bel lows. Motion, Ayes 5,
Nays 0.
N
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 28, 1986
#1010 DUANE F. HALL
1860 SHADYWOOD ROAD
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
Duane Hall was present for this matter. He stated that
the Council was familiar with this application and asked
for their support in his application. Zoning
Administrator Mabusth reviewed the application for the
Council stating that this is a request for a subdivision
with the need to grant 3 separate variances.
Councilmember Frahm stated that a new subdivision must
meet all the zcning requirements without any variances
in order: to be ,-approved. Counci lmembers Adams and
Hammerel concurrec..
Mayor Butler read a letter to the people in at.cendance
from Milton Siefert, 1856 Shadywood Road, an abutting
property owner, who expressed his desire to have the
Council deny Mr. Hall's application.
Ewald and Miriam Gustafson, 1890 Shadywood Road, Glenn
Tillotson, 1875 Shadywood Poad and Olga Taylor, 1880
Shadywood Road neignboring property owners, were in
attendance. Mr. Gustafson addressed the Council stating
that he hoped the Council would deny Mr. Hal l's
application.
Council felt that because this was a subdivision that
needed varicnces to the newly created lots, the
subdivision should be denied.
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Grabek to deny the preliminary subdivision
by Duane Hall and direct staff to write a resolution of
denial for presentation to the Council at their May 12,
1986 Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Olga M. Taylor, 1880 Shadywood Road, thanked the Council
for their decision of denial in this matter.
#1000 i 1009 WILLIAM WEAR
� 160 WAY7.ATA BOULEVARD
VARY"CE
William Wear was present fcr this matter.
City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed the application
for a variance t.o the sign ordinance and variance to
moratorium ordinance for properties located within the
Highway 12 Corridor.
.4
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APR1L 28, 1986
#1000 6 1009 WEAR continued
Mayor Butler sated that she reviewed this application
from across the street and from that viewpoint felt that
because of the amount of signs and visual clutter on
that stretch of road was not an ideal area for another
sign. Mayor Butler suggested that Mr. Wear wait until
the Highway 12 Corridor study is completed
(approximately in July) in order to establish the
guidelines foi_ future signage -along the corridor.
Mr. Wear stated that tie has no problem waiting but his
tenants are anxious to obtain signage.
G.L. Roulette, a tenant of the building, felt that the
delay would hurt their new business and that the
temporary signs were unattractive.
Councilmember Adams stated that in order to avoid future
problems the moratorium i appropriate.
Councilmember Grabek stated that by putting in another
sign would be adding to the clutter and is in favor of
the moratorium.
Councilmember Frahni stated that he has no problem with
the sign but is not in favor of lifting the moratorium.
Councilmember Hammerel expressed. his understanding for
the need of signage for a new business and felt
undecided about a variance to the moratorium.
Mr. Wear requested that. the Council work with him in
allowing him to have a decent. temporary sign for two
months. He noted that because of the design of the
building two signs are needed.
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Frahm, to table this matter at this time.
Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
ENGINEER'S REPORT:City Engineer Cook was not present and had no report.
MAYOR'S REPORT:
Mayor Butler reported that she will be arrested on May
14, 1986 at 9:00 a.m. in participation of the Hennepin
County Cancer Society "Jail & Bail" fund raising drive.
CABLE TV REPORT*
LAX F. M I NN ETON KA C'OM M I TY NEWS PROGRAM
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, to accept the report on Lake
Minnetonka Cagle Commission's "Lake Minnetonka News".
Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
4
MINUTES OF THE RF.GU►.�iR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 28, 1986
CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
VANEECKHOUT -- SEPTIC/SEWER
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request
from Mr. C:.arles VanEec�_ `.out. Mr. %'anEeckhout owns a
3.75 acre parcel north cf Long Lake on North Brown Road
and had inquired about the possibility of hooking up to
Long Lake sewer back in February, at which time staff
told him it was the Ci.ty's policy not to allow sewer
hook-up if septic was available. Based on research done
by Mr. VanEeckhout, he feels that septic is not a viable
possibility for that property and again requests
consideration of sewer hook-up.
FUL " - SEWER
3507 WAYZATA BIND.
Mr. Charles VanEeckhout was present for thi:, matter and
stated that based on Steve Schirmers' evaluation it is a
very undesirable site for an on -site disposal system.
The system would have to be upstream from the house
creating a pumping problem, and perc tests revealed very
bad' soil. He stated that it was a very difficult sitc
and would probaoly .require some variances even with a
mound system. Iie feels the most feasible solution is to
hook-up to the sewer system.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that this
was in fact a questionable site and recommends further
testing.
City Administrator Bernhardson noted the differences in
this request and the Stebbins request and that if this
request were approved staff would recommend the property
stay at the same density. He stated that he did not
feel that whether it was an Orono or Long lake unit was
not a substantial issue.
Councilmember Frahm voiced concerns regarding the City
protecting itself from the possibilities of a future
subdivision of that property. However, he was not
comfortable with putting an on -site system on this
lakeshore property if it is questionable.
It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconde
Councilmember Frahm, to instruct staff to contact t_ I
LAke requesting one sewer unit and if they are den
that further analysis for a mound system would have to
be dune. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained that following
approval of the conditional use permit back in July 1984
it has been determined that the site is not able to have
a septic system that will accomodate the commercial use
5
MINUTES OP THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 28, 1986
FULMER continued
and the Fulmer's are requesting approval to sewer the
property through the new Maple Plain -Long Lake
interceptor. He notes that this would require a
•jari.ance to the Hwy. 12 Corridor Study Moratorium.
Brian Fulmer was present for this matter and stated that
they are at a decision point to determine what to do
with his facility, if they are unable to connect to
sewer they may have to relocate the business.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the
topographical problems with the property.
Mayor Butler L tated she would like to see the Fulmer's
commercial and residential use continue.
It was moved by Councilmember Hammerel, seconded by
Councilmember Adams, that City Council direct staff to
request Metro Waste Control Commission allow the
property at 7 Wayzata Blvd. to be hooked -up to the
Maple Plain/L.ng Lake interceptor line. Motion, Ayes 3,
Nays 2. Councilmembers Frahm and Grabek voted nay.
Councilmember. Frahm stated that when the City was forced
to have the interceptor put in, it was the intent net to
have anyone hookup to it and feels by allowing this it
would be setting a precedent. HP stated that he would
like the Hwy. 12 corridor study to be completed before
considering it. In addition, he noted that when the
Fulmer's made application for the conditional use permit
they were advised that the property was not large enough
and now feels that the business is outgrowing the
property.
FACILITIES ASSESSMENT
City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed the facilities
assessment and noted that present facilities must hookup
to city sewer soon. He requested the Counci 1 to voice
any issues or concerns.
Mayor Butler inquired about sites to relocate the
commercial use out of a residential area.
City Administrator Bernhardson listed several sit.Fs L'cr
consideration. He noted that they were residential
areas but less dense than the Crystal Bay location. He
noted that they would like to provide a location to
accomodate all the departments together.
LaDean McWilliams stated her desire to get some funds
for historical preservation of the present Council
Chambers.
6
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 28, 1986
FACILITIES ASSESSMENT continued
It was moved by Councilmember Hammerel, seconded by
Mayor Butler, to direct staff to do further research on
this matter and bring it back to the Council meeting on
May 27, 1986. notion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
NAVARRE REDEVELOPMENT
City Administrator Bernhardson reported on the proposed
times table for the Navarre Redevelopment.
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, to direct staff with any
thoughts Counci 1 may have regard inq Navarre
,:e6evelopment.
ADMINISTRATOR'S GOAL SETTING
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded Councilmember
Frahm, that the Council members will submit their
evaluations to the Mayor for her c-nsideration and
discussions with one other Cc:unci lmember to negotiate
any amendments for the City Administrator's contract
for the year 1 May, 1986 to 30 April, 1987. Motion,
Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Councilmember Grabek volunteered to meet with the Mayor
on this matter.
LIQUOR OPERATIONS REPORT - JANUARY-MARCH 1986
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Hammerel, to accept the report and continue on course
with the liquor operation plan for 1986. Motion, Ayes
5, Nays 0.
1,:zISTANT CHIEF/REPLACKMENT - UPGRADE
City Administrator Bernhardson stated that with
Assistant Chief Burmaster's retirement the City will be
screening for an appointment. In addition, during
budget period last fall there was discussion of uprading
the Sergeant's position to Assistant Chief which staff
feels should not be done automatically but should be
done through a screening process by an outside agency.
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Mayor
Butler, that the City Council direct the City
Administrator to select Personnel Management.
Incorporated to undertake the screening for position of
Assistant Chief and that those monies allocated within
the Police budget be used to fund payment of this
selection process. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 1.
Councilmember Grabek voted nay stating he felt is was a
waste of money.
7
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIh MEETING HELD APRTi 28, 198f
LIGHT BAR
ZONING AMENDMENT
REFUNDS -*
BUILDING
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded b} Mayor
Butler, to authorize purchase of the light bar, from Don
Streicher Gun in the amount of $544.95, from 1986
capital budget funds. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Councilmember Frahm inquired about adjustable light
bars.
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Adams, that the Council having identified any initial
concerns with the amendments table this item until the
meeting on May 12, 1986. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
PERMIT/KANGAS
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, City Council direct the staff to
issue a partial refund in the amount of $1460.50 to
Kangas Bu=lders Inc. for Building Permit #5939 dated
4/16/86, with the balance of the fees paid to be
ratained to cover incurred and anticipated
administrative costs. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
GENERAL PERMIT/WIDMKR
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, City Council direct staff to
issue a refund in the amount c ` i75.00 t:o o., me . taros.
Inc. for General Permit 0842 Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
1985 FINAWIAL REPORT*
It. was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Hamn.crel, the City Council accept the
Final 1985 Summary of Receipts, Disbursements and
Balances dated April 25, 1986. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
HAZARDOUS BUILDING*
RESOLD?ION i1986
it was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, that Council adopt Resolution
#1986 commencing hazardous building proceedings against
the garage structure at 2941 Casec Point Road. Motion,
Ayes 5, Nays 0.
CONVEYING LAND ON PENCE LANE TO PRIVATE OWNER - *
PER RBSOLU?101i
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Grabek, the the Orono City Council execute
the appropriate quit claim deed reserving to the City
the appropriate perpetual easements. Motion, Ayes 5,
Nays 0.
8
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEFTINC HELD APRIL 28, 1966
ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION*
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, to accept City Administrator
Bernhardson's information report regarding: Ccmmunity
Development Block Grant -Crystal Bay, Highway 12 Study,
and Painter's Creek Watershed Fro;ect. Motion, Ayes 5,
Nays 0.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT:
City A 'orney Blatz had nothing to report at this time.
LICENSES•
BILLS*
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, to approve the followinq
licenses:
One Day Setup Permit - Art Center of Minnesota
Saturday, May 3, 1986
Cigarette License - Wayzata Country Club
Solicitors License - Blue Bell Ice Cream
Septic System Installers - Patnode Bros. Sewer/Water
Hayes Excavating
Garbage & Refuse Collector - Orlin A. Redepenning
Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, to approve payment of th- All
Funds Accounts and Liquor Store Accounts. Motion, Ayes
5, Nays 0.
ADJOURNMENT 9:43 P.M.
it was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Hammerel, to adjourn the regular Council meeting a._ 9:43
P.M. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
ATTEST:
l lit Ls T.1 _ /2 � • .x.AL��a�.
,,•Db,eothy M. ,,Aal l in," City Clerk
A":,
Mary C. Butler, Mayor
4
AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SOT FOR MONDAY, APRIL 28, 1986, 7:09 P.M.
(*) Asterisk items are conuidere•l to be routine items to be enacted upon by
one motion by the City Cnun;_il un.ier the Consent Item* on the agenda.
Discussion will he held up-;n request.
ROLL CALL
1. CONSENT AGENDA*
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
* 2. Regular Meeting of April 14, 1986
' U 7
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT - JoEllen Hurr Representative
3. Metro Council Task Force Report
4. Liquor on the Lake
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS
PUBLIC COMMENTS -- (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person)
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
* 5. i990 Ward Ferrell, 3405 Watertown Road - Variance - Resolution of
Denial - Continued to May 12, 1986 Council Meeting
* 6. 1819 William Mills, 200 Leaf Street - Final Subdivision Approval -
Resolution
* 7. #998 Maureen Bellows, 265 South Brown Road - Final SubAivison Approval
- Resolution
B. #101.0 Duane Hall, 1863 Shadywood Road - Preliminary Subdivision
9. #1000 s 11009 William Wear, 2160 Wayzata Boulevard - Variance
F.NG I NEER ' S REPORT
MAYOR'S REPORT
CABLE. TV REPORT
*10. Lake Minn(,tr)nka Community News Pro;_am
CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
11. VanEeckhout - Septic/Sewi:�r
12. Fulmer - Sewer
13. Facilities assessment
14. Navarre Redevelopment
15. Administrator's Goal Setting
16. Liquor Report - January -March 186
17. Assistant Chief/R,placement - Upgrade
18. Ligh, Bar
19. Zoning Amendment
*20. Refund - T;uil,ling Permit/Mangas - General Permit/Widmer
*21. 1985 Financial Report
*22. Hazardous Building - Resolution
*23. Conveying Land on Pence Lane to Private Owner - Per Resolati;an
*24. Administrator's Information
C.D.B. G.
Highw.iy 12 Study
Paint<-r's CreeklWator Shf-I project Procesr, Report
CITY ATTORNEY "I REPORT
LICY.WSRS (25*)
HILLS (26*)
AnJOURNMFMT
4
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HF.L0 APRIL 14, 1986
ATTENDANLn 7:00 Y.M.
The Orono Council net crn the above date with the
following members present: Mayor Butler, Councilmembers
Gr.rbek, Frahm, and Hammerel. Counci lmember Adams
arrive,] at 7:16 P.M. The following represented the City
s,.aff. Acting City Adminis-rator C:erhardson (Public
Works C.^_)r.dinator), Building & Zoning Administrator
Mabusth, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron, Chief
of Police Y.ilbc, and City Recorder Peterson. Also
present wer•> City E,igiiletr Cook and City Attorney Blatz.
YEAR XII URBAN -'NNZPIN COUNTY
,'OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS
^'BLIC HEARING 7:00 - 7:14 P.M.
The Affidavit of Piblication was noted.
Acting City Administrator Gerh-t6son explained the
purpose of the public hearing tc. consider the proposed
use of Year XII Community Develop.nent Block Grant. monies
in the amount of $18,685.00 to be allocr.ted (and added
to previous amounts) to reaucing the sanitary sewer
assessments to the residents in Crystal Bay that qualify
in the low to moderate income level.
Gary Printup, 1.261 Briar St., stated that. he was
recently informed of an additional $70,000 of funds that
have arrived from "somewhere" that are going to be used
to pay 10 parcels of eligible sewer assessments, in one
amount this year, so that there will be no
reapplications in succeeding years for people that may
fall victim to circumstances beyond their control to
make application for funds in the future. He questioned
where this additional $70,000 come from an:i why it is
earmarked to pay assessments off at one time and not go
under the progran of annual reapplication. He noted
e.i,wt this informal -ion was contained in a letter from
City Attorney Radio to Crystal Bay resident's attorney,
of which he did no,.: have a ropy of in his possession.
City Attorney Bla--z stated that Attorney Radio will he
present later in the meeting to clarify this matter.
In the meantime, Mr. Pri.,tup left the meeting to obtain
a copy of this letter he 'ias referenced.
Mayor Butler stated that the Puh: is Hearinq reoardinq
the Year XII funds must cont�nue. There were no ol-her
comments from the public and the Public Hearinq was
closed.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 1986
YEAR XII URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY continued
It. was moved by Mayor. Butler, st_jnded by Councilmember
Fray , to approve the application for request of
Con city Development Block Grant Funds for Year :'II as
ov :ned. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
CONSENT AGENDA*
OATH OF OFFICE
Upon Attorney Radio's presence, he was asked to provide
the Crystal Bay residents with answers regarding the
formula for dispersal of $70,000 for certain sewer
assessment charges.
Attorney Radio stated that the $70,000 in question is
monies from previous years CDBG funds and also
discretionary funds provided from the County Board to
pay off qualifying sewer asses gents.
Acting City Administrator Gerhardson advised the
residents present for this matter to come to his office
during office hours for clarification of these funds a '
the procedure for disbursement.
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Cnu cilmember Hammerel, to approve the Consent Agenda*
4 r jest to removal of item 18 (Special Events Summary
Ordinance) upon staf.f's request. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays
0.
Chief of Police Kilbo introduced Mr.. Larr Tomcheck.
Acting City Administrator Gerhardson administered the
Oath of Office to Larry Tomcheck appointing him a Police
Officer for the City of Orono.
NOTE: COUNCILM. MBPR ADAMS ARRIVED AT THIS TIME.
COMMENDATION -• ROSEMARY ROSEDAHL
RESOLUTION #1976
Chief of Police Kilbo introduced Rosemary Rosedahl who
assisted police in the apprehension of the suspect
involved in the armed robbery at Snyders Drug Store in
Long Lake committed on February 23, 1986. He noted tt.
Ms. Rosedahl provided police with a descripti- of the
suspect and on February 24, 1986, when thi ..uspect
telephoned her, she engaged him in a telephone
conversation for approximately one and a half hours
during which time Northwestern Bell Security had ample
time to trace the telephone call thereby enabling the
coordination of law enforcement personnel from Hennepin
County, Orono Police. Ramsey County Sher.ff's Department
and New Brighton PoIA'C•e 'o Zipprehend the suspect.
2
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 1986
COMMENDATION continued
After the proposed resolution was read to the public by
Mayor Butler, it was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by
Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution #1976 a
General Commendation to Ro,emary Rosedahl. Motion, Ayes
5, Nays 0.
APPROVAL, OF MINUTES*
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmemoer iiammerel, to approve the Minutes of the
March 10, 1986 Council meeting as submitted. Motion,
Ayes 4, Nays 0.
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS
Planning Commission membe- Maureen Bellows was present
and had no comments at th. ime.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Regarding the previous matter of Community Development
Block Grant Funds, LaDean McWilliams, 1130 Willow Dr.,
questioned what type of programs were repayment
programs. She also mentioned the city's involvement of
subordination to assist homeowners in refinancing.
Acting City Administrator Gerhardson noted that there
has been one request and that at this time the City will
handle this type of request on an individual basis.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
#935 WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB*
200 W. WAYZATA BIND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
RESOLUTION i1977
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Fiammerel, to adopt Resolution #1977
granting a Conditional Use Permit to permit certain
grading projects regulated under. Municipal Zoning Code
Serction 10.03 Subdivision 19, and to permit
construction of a shelter building per Section 10.20
Subdivision 3. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
#967 i #968 JOHN B.A. IDSTROM*
2580 FOX STREET
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL
RESOLUTION 11978
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Iiammere1., to adopt Resolution #1978
granting Preliminary Approval for a Plat at 2580 Fox
Street. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
3
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII. MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 1986
#990 WARD FERRELL
3405 WATERTOWN ROAD
VARIANCE - SECOND REVIEW
Acting City Administrator Gerhardson explained the
request for a lot width and lot area variance for two
rural properties on Watertowr Road noting this was
previously reviewed by Council un March 10, 1986 which
at that time was tabled because the entire Council was
not present to review it.
Ward Ferrell was present for this matter and stated his
attorney unaware of this meeting and was unable to
attend due to a previous appointment.
Mayor Butler asked Mr. Ferrell if he wished to defer
this lhatter until the next. Council meeting in order for
his attorney to be present. Mayor Butler informed him
that if this application is denied, he mast wait six
months to reapply.
Mr. Ferrell stated that he would like to proceed with
his application and depending on the outcome will
consult with his attorney. He noted that he still
feels that he is entitled to build a house and sell one
lot to help pay for his retirement home as long as he
has owned the land since 1.948. Ferrell stated he
divided it because the Council asked him to in 1958, and
the Council accepted the four lots and that the present
Council has a moral obligation to honoz what that
Council told him.
Zoning Administrator Gaffron updated Councilmeirbers
Grabek and Hammerel (who were absent at the March loth
meeting) that Mr. Ferrell was requesting permission for
3 homes on a total of 2.9 acres in a two -acre zone. The
3 lets are commonly owned by Mr. Ferrell and consist of
1..01 acres (upon which Mr. Ferrell's present home is
located), 1.04 acres, and .85 acres respectively. He
noted that. applicant has submitted soil testing and site
plans to indicate that both septic systems and houses
can be placed on each lot. He noted that the question
is whether this would set a precedent- by granting
approval.
Mr. Ferrell noted that. the "28 similar case" parcels
rioted in staff's memo are less than two acres with the
exception of one and that none of these parcels have
been owned as Yong as he has owned his property. Mr.
Ferrell stated that he had planned to build a retirement
home on one lot and sell the other lot for payment for
the house and retirement: equity. He feels that the
financial hardship should be considered.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 1986
#990 WARD FERRELL continued
Mayor Butler stated that the Council has to consider the
legalities involved with future requests if they were to
approve his application.
Councilmember Adams noted that even by allowing one home
to be built would require a variance of the acre
minimum lot requirement..
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that the
zoning code has changed during the time that Ferrell has
owned the property, however the code did not
specifically address "commonly owned" lots until 1984.
City Attorney Blatz stated that it was the Council's
duty to enforce the code as it stands today and that
comments made by previous councilmembers are not legally
binding.
Councilm(.mber Grabek noted that (per memo) within a 1/2
mile rad.us of the applicants property, there were 37
hot.sFs with less than 2 acres and 39 with 2 acres or
more. He stated that part of the common ownership
ratiorale was "how do these lots fit in the surrounding
area"? He questioned if Ferrell's lots would support
septic systems.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that the
lots would support septic systems under limited
development i.e, no tennis court, pool., etc.
Councilmember Grabek asked City Attorney B1at7 the legal.
ramifications involved if this Were approved.
Attorney Blatz stated that there is a potential problem
which the Council should reveiw. As far as granting e
variance, Council must find an L' ue hardship to Mr.
Ferrell. She noted that in 1.981 imilar request was
denied because applicant did not .unst.rate a hardship,
no sanitary sewer was available, _.nd insufficient area
and width. She stated that it is her opinion that if
Council cannot differentiate Mr. Ferre 1 l 's property from
others, that by granting the request in effect they
would be changing the ordinance.
Councilmember Grabek questioned whether there would be
legal justification to approve this application without
changing the ordinance based on 1) a house can be built
on each lot safely with septic system 2) it is
consistent with the neighborhood size lots 3) applicant
has been a citizen of Orono since 1936.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 1986
#990 WARD FERRELL continued
Attorney blatz stated that it is a policy decision
Council must decide upon and that the undue hardship
finding must be spelled out in the resolution to support
the variance approval.
Councilmember Grabek stated that it seemed to be the
"just" thing to do to grant this variance and he felt it
would not be making that much of an exception for other
cases that may come up.
Mayor butler stated that this was a dilemma due to the
unique circumstancL,s however, she felt realistically she
would have to recommend denial because, in her view, it
would completely change the zoning policy. She
expressed her fear in having to plant another sewer
system.
Councilmember Frahm stated that he has problems with the
"common ownership" issue and whether there is a
difference between sewered areas vs. non-sewered areas.
fie noted that if this request were approved the
ordinance should be changed and be more clearly defined.
Councilmember Grabek stated that he felt the direction
of the change made in 1974 was to be able to provide a
reviewal on an individual. basis.
Planning Commission member Bellows stated that one way
to differentiate between common ownership vs. separate
ownership, in separate ownership the hardship would be
not allowing them to use their property, whereas, in Mr.
Ferrell's case he is able to live on his property and
use it. She also noted that the only hardship in Mr.
Ferrrell's case is financial which cannot be considered
as a valid hardship.
Mayor Butler noted that she would be open to allowing
one additional home but not two.
Councilmember tfammerel stated that this is a hard
decision but he felt two houses in an area where there
is not enough area for one house without a variance is
an excess, especially in an unsewered zone.
Councilmember Adams stated that, he felt sympathetic in
Mr. Ferrell's case but he felt 1 acre lots in an
unsewered area is undesirable.
Councilmember Grabek questioned whether there would be a
problem because Mr. Ferrell's attorney was not. notified.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 1986
#990 WARD FERREI.L continued
Attorney blatz stated that she felt Mr. Ferrell made a
knowledgable waiver of attorney and was made aware that
he could have delayed the matter in order to have his
attorney presenr.
Councilmember Grabek questioned if approval of this
request would significantly impact the non-sewered area.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that in
his opinion, it would not have a significant impact in
that particular area.
Mayor Butler stated that taking into consideration that
the request is for development of three residential
units on 2.9 acres in a 2-acre zone; it was moved by
Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to direct
staff tc prepare a resolution of denial based on the
following:
At this point., Mayor Butler again stated that she felt
it fair to inform Mi. Ferrell, that before an actual
vote and decision is made, he has the option to request
tabling of his application in order for his attorney to
be present.
Mr. Ferrell's response was that he did not think iv.
would make any difference because the Council has
already made up their mind:
1) Extent of variances.
2) Known fallibility of septic systems on small
lots.
3) Denial does not deprive owner's rights to
reasonable use as residential property as it stands
now.
4) Nu hardship to the land justifying request.
5) Zoning code demands 2 acres of dry buildable
property per parcel wherein this parcel is 2.9 acres
overall requesting 3 buildable lots.
Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 1. Counciltr mber Grabek voted nay.
# 1007 CAPOL T", PP*
4701 WEST ;+RANCH ROAD
PRELIMINIARY" SUBDIVISION
RRSOI.UTI ON 11979
Carol Trapp was present for this matter.
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, to adopt. Resolution 01979
granting Preliminary approval for a plat at 4701 We-.,t
Branch Road. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
7
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MISTING HELD APRIL 14, 1986
#1010 DUANE H. HAL.L
1860 SHADYWOOD ROAD
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
Acting City Administrator. Gerhardson explained the
request for a subdivision and variance at 1860 Shadywood
Road in %,hick properties are legally combined.
Applicant is requesting to a subdivision of a lot line
rearrangement to create a new building site and
variances of lot area, lot width, and hardcover.
Planning Commission recommended denial of this
application. He noted tnat Mr. Hall has notified staff
and Council in his letter (attached to memo) that he
would not be able to be present at this meeting but
requests Council to act on his application in his
absence.
Mayor Butler asked ttorney Blatz her opinion regarding
action on this application without applicant's presence.
Attorney Blatz stated her recommendation would be to
defer action until applicant and/or a representative for
applicant is present.
Rased on Attorney Blatz's opinion, it. was moved by
Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Grabek,
to table this application.
f1013 STEVE KATAINEN
3850 SHORELINE DRIVE
COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW
Acting City Adr, •trator Gerhardson explained the
application for .:ommercial site plan revei.w for
proposed 80'x84' structure to house furniture
sales/storage operation. He noted that. the furniture
store use is not currently addressed in the B-5 zone,
however the Planning Commission has found the use to
meet the intent of the B-5 zoning district. Applicant
has provided all necessary information and has agreed to
enter into a developers agreement to assure completion
of certain ie improvements.
Steve Katainen was present for this matt.EL.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that the City
Engineer and M.C.W.D. has confirmed that the property
will have no drainage problems and are satisfied with
the hydrolic information submitted by applicant's
engineer.
Mr. Katainen indicated that the proposed building would
be finished on all four sides with brick 6 wood siding,
however the actual building drawings have not been
finalized.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII. MhETING HELD APRIL 14, 1986
11013 STEVE KATAINEN continued
Because Council would like to see the final plans before
giving final approval, it was moved by Councilmember
Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, to grant
preliminary approval of the Commercial Site Plan and
upon receipt of the final plans for signage, lighting,
landscaping, and exterior finish of building will grant
final approval; and developers agreement to be provided
before issuance of buildino permit. Motion, Ayes 5,
Nays 0.
1986 JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE*
SANDY BEACH PI&ACE
RESOLUTION i1980
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Hammer.el, to adopt Resolution #1980
approving a Joint Use Dock License to Sandy Beach Place
for the period of January 1, 1986 to December 31, 1986.
Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
ENGINEER'S REPORT:
ORONO MWCC INTERCEPTOR UPDATE
City Engineer Glenn Cook introduced Michael Lynch of
Bonestroo & Associates who is working for the
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission on the Metro Waste
Interceptor in Orono.
Mr. Lynch reported that the infiltration/inflow study
done in 1981 indicated that it would not be cost
effective to eliminate the infiltration/inflow to extend
the life of the interceptor system. At that time, Orono
told MWCC to increase capacity or there would be a
problem in the near future. He noted that in April 1985
they reached capacity in which 15,000 gallons of sewage
overflowed into Lake Minnetonka. Att this point, he was
hired by MWCC to study the system to determine the areas
that were under capacity and present a preliminary
design report. Upon .approval of the report by MWCC thNy
anticipate improvements to begin in Spring 1987.
Mr. Lynch explainer? the findings of the st, ..y which
contained present and future daily wastewater flews,
future flow summary, and lift station & interceptor
analysis. He pointed out that most of the lift stations
were currently over their respective rated capacities.
He prE.:sented three alternatives to improve the system
taking into consideration cast efficiency and causing
minimal disruption.
Because this project is only at the preliminary stage,
Mayor Butler requested Mr. Lynch to keep them informed
on this matter.
9
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 1.986
MWCC INTERCEPTOR continued
lie stated that he would report back when the project is
ot the preliminary design stage.
MAYOR'S REPORT:
CABLE TV REPORT:
:Mayor Butler hac othing to report at this time.
There was no Cable TV report at this time.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
JOHN S. PILLSBURY,
JR.
315 WOODBILL ROAD
FINAL SUBDIVISION
RESOLUTION #1937
Councilmember Adams reported that this item was
previously presented to the Council at their March loth
meeting in which Councilmembers Grabek and Hammerel were
absent. He stated that before the Council took action,
he made them aware that he was a trustee of the Woodhill
Country Club explaining that he felt there was not a
conflict of interest involved because neither he or
Woodhill Country Club would benefit f i.naricia f l y from
approval of the subdivision. However, even though he
felt there was no conflict of interest involved, he
would abstain from voting if the other Council members
felt otherwise. It was noted that this application would
be delayed for a month in order to get a quorum vote.
Due to the fact that City Attorney Barrett, Mayor. Butler
and Councilmember Frahm agreed that there was no
conflict of interest, the Council. took action and voted
3-0 approving the Class I subdivision. Councilmember
Adams stated that because there is now quorum present,
he would abstain from voting if the Council felt it
necessary to reconsider the motion, however he still
felt there was no conflict of interest involved.
City Attorney Blatt stated that she concurred with
Attorney Barr�tt's opinion that there was no conflict of
interest involved due to the fact that there was nothirg
in the subdivision resolution that stated that Pillsbury
had to sell to Woodhill Country Club.
After discussion, it was the Council's unani.i.ous opinion
that there was no conflict of interest involved and felt
no reason for Councilmember Adams to abstain fro^i
voting. In support of this, Council decide(.' to ratify
the vote in this matter.
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Grabek, to adopt Resol.utinn t1937
approving class T Subdivision for John S. Pillsbury,
Jr. Motion., Ayes 5, Nays 0.
MINUTES OF THE: REGULAR ORONO COUNCIh MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 1986
LAKE MINNETONKA USE & ACCESS*
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, the City Council accept the
information relating to the Metro Council's Lake
Minnetonka Task Force. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
FACILITIES ASSESSMENT*
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, that the City Council accept the
assessment report for discussion at its April 28, 1986
meeting. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
NAVARRE REDEVELOPMENT*
It was moved
by Councilmember
Frahm, seconded by
Councilmeml.)er
Hammerel,
that the City Council
accept
the information
from the
Administrator regarding
Navarre
Redevelopment
and that
the issue be discussed
at the
April 28, 1986
Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 4,
Nays 0.
ADMINISTRATOR'S GOAL SETTING AND EVALUATION-*
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, the Council accept the various
documents from tre Administrator and that the 1986/87
Goal Setting together with Council discussion of the
Administrator's first year performance be placed on the
agenda. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
SPECIAL EVENTS SUMMARY ORDINANCE
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Frahm, to approve the summary ordinance for publication
of Ordinance No. 5.25 and 6.08 Parades and Special
Events. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Councilmember Adams suggested some additional type of
notification of this ordinance to realt.urs, Parade of
Homes, ctc.
RESIGNATION -- STEVE PEARSON*
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, to accept the resignation of
Steve Pearson as patrol officer effective 3/18/86.
Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
EMPLOYMENT - POLICE OFFICER*
LARKY TOMCHPCK
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, se:.,onded by
Councilmember Hammerel, to confirm the employment of
Larry Tomcheck as a Police Officer for the City of Orono
effective April 10, 1986. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL, MEETING HELD APRIL 11, 1986
3220 WATERTOWN ROAD - *
HAZARDOUS BUILDING PROCEEDINGS
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, to direct staff to hold in
abeyance hazardous building proceedings if a reasonable
fix up schedule can be maintained by current owner.
Motion, Ayes 4, ways 0.
SHAVER/TEARSE RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT*
RESOLUTION #.1.983
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, to adopt Resolution No. 1983
grainting right-of-way permit to the Shaver/Tearse
property application P.I.D.02-117-23 43 0011. Motion,
Ayes 4, Nays 0.
NATIONAL VOLUNTEER WEEK*
RESOLUTION #1981
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, that the City adopt Resolution
No. 1981 establishing AE ri l 20-•27, 1.986 as National
Volunteer Week in the City of Orono together with
proclamation thanking all the City's volunteers for
their excellent efforts. Mo'4on, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
CRYSTAL BAY SEWER PROJECT -
CAUCUS RESOLUTION
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, that the Cit Council
acknowledge receipt of the caucus resolution dated March
18, 1986. Motion., Ayes 4, Nays 0.
DRIVEWAY -- 1180 RIMOOD - QUIT CLAiM DEED*
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, that Council approve the
information as presented by staff for driveway easement.
at 1180 Elmwood Avenue. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
RESIGNATION*
ASSISTANT CHIEF WINTON BURMASTER
It was mo,led by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, that Council accept the
resignation of Assistant Chief Winton Burmaster,
effective April 30, 1986. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
TEMPORARY XKPIOYM1 XT GOLF COURSE*
It was moved by Councilmember
Councilmember Hammerel, to employ
Golf Co-irse as follows:
Doug Erickson, Betty Stevens,
Peterson, Elizabeth Gallo, and
ranging from $4.20 to $4.90 Het
Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
Frahm, seconded by
temporary help at the
Stephanie Sligo► Roy
Don Oats at hourly pay
hour.
12
MINUTES OF THE R" T.AR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HE! PRIL 14, 1986
SPRING CLEAN UP - M. ND MAY LOTH*
It moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Counc.ii.memoer Hammerel, that t1,e Orono annual Spring
Clean Up be scheduled for Saturday, May 3rd and
Saturday, May 10th from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Motion,
Ayes 4, Nays 0.
TRAPPING PERMIT - 1700 SHORELINE DRIVE
Council reviewed the application for a limited leghold
trap (underwater trapline) permit from Irwin Jacobs,
1700 Shoreline Drive, for a period of one year.
Mayor Butler questioned the time period of one year
stating that the traps could be potentially dangerous if
forgotten about.
Councilmember Grabek concurred with Mayor Butler stating
that he felt this type of trai.; should be eliminated from
populated areas as they can be dangerous to pets &
children. He stated that there have been cor..plaints
about traps being allowed previously and that they are
not frequently checked. He noted that there should be
consideration of signage and that there is alternative
methods to protect trees that should be addressed such
as screening. He suggested approval of the permit for
30 to 90 days and then reviewal.
It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, `.:onded by
Councilmember Adams, to approve the Trap Permit for a
period of 90 days only. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION*
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, to accept City Administrator
Bernhardson's Information report regarding Big Island,
Comprehensive Storrs Water Manaqement Plan, and Traffic
Review of Hwy. 12jWi l low Dr. Intersecticn. Motion, Ayes
4, Nays 0.
VANERCKHOUT BUILDING CORPORATION REQUEST
Assistant. 'honing Admir.istratur Gaffron explained that a
letter of request arrived during City Administrator
.iernhardson'u absence from VanEeckhout Building
Corporation to connect to Long Lake's sewer system. He
noted that he p- -eared the memo for Councils'
information onl id upon City Administrator
Bernhardson's retu meeting wi 11 be setup with Mr.
VanEeckhout for re
Mr. VanEeckhout was present for this matt_ and noted
that the property in question is adjacent. to the City of
Long Lake and is a very "difficult site to work with`.
13
Mayor Butler advised Mr. VanEeckhout to meet with the
City Admi"i-`rator to review it and the Council will
discuss the _..atter further at the April 28th Council
meetinn.
RXZCUTIVB SESSION 10:30 P.M.
At this time, the Council and City AttO:.,ey Blatz
entered into Executive Session.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT:*
QUORUM INFORMATION
LICENSES*
BILLS*
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, to accept City Attorney Blatz's
information report regardi-q Quorums & Effective of
Absentions. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
it was moved by Councilr.tember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, to approve the following
licenses:
Limited Firearms Use Permit -
John Harold/Stev^n Panuska, 3140 Watertown Rd.
Solicitation License - Discount Flowers
On -Sale Beer License - Orono Golf Course
Special Events License -
American Youth Hostels Minn. Ironman Ride
Bicycle Ride on April 27, 1986
Home Occupation License -
Ben Meinhardt,317,85Sixth Avenue North
Garbage & Refuse Collt- tor's License -
Blackowiak & Son
Woodlake Sanitary Service Inc.
Septic System Installer License -
Halstad Contracting
McCarty Water and Waste
Ingleside Engineering & Construction Inc.
Earl W. Day & Sons Inc.
Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
It was _.oved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Counci lmember Hammerel, to approve payment of the All
Fu Accounts and Liquor Store Accounts. Motion, Ayes
4, , ays 0.
ADJOORMQISNT 11: 5 0 P.M.
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Grabek, to adjourn the regular Orono Council meeting at
11:50 P.M. Motion, Ayes 5, NPN,s 0.
ATTEST:
othy M. Hal 1 in", City Clerk tr!3ry_i'. Butler, Mayor
14
41Fi&G.6
J
iU D. mWING
APR 2 61g86
TO: Mayor and City Council Xy Or OkVNo
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrate
DATE: April 18, 1,986
SUBJECT: Metro Counc .e Minnetonka Task Force Report
As you are probably aware the Lake Minnetonka "'ask Force report
has been issued and apprjied by Metro Council and considered by
the Governor's Executive Committee on April 15, 1986.
The report as ap, ,vel by Metro Council is attaches?. The report
approved by the Mc: I Council differed in part from thu Task
For.ce's report as it relates to King's Point in that they felt
DNR could go in and establish a temporary faci 1 i ty, but that no
permenant facility be constructed before April 1, 1991. The Task
Force itself had felt that no development of any section should
be done until 1991. At the Executive Committee they accepted the
report after deleting the King's Point boat launching sit as
they felt that the whole King's Pt7int issue should be put on
hold. The Commissioner of Natural Resources, Joe Alexander,
however, state_3 *hat he wr,s going ahead and develop the property.
Hence the Govenor's Executive Council did not have the authority
to prevent him from developing the site. Presently the City is
waiting to see if Minnetrista does initiate some type of, legal
action in the courts to prevent furt:ier development of the site.
cc: JoEllen Hurr
REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS
ISSUE 1: ADEQUACY OF PUBLIC ACCESS TO LAKE MINNETONKA
1.1 That action is needed to provide more and better quality public access at
boat launches for small craft and fishing boats and at shoreline access
points as part of the regulation of surface use on Lake Minnetonka.
1.2 That two immediate actions should occur:
a. Establish a new process for planning and regulating surface use (,n Lake
Minnetonka, as outlined under Intergovernmental Coordination on Lake
Minnetonka, eisewhere in th's report (see page 16).
b. Provide expanded funding for the new activity levels prescribed in the
sections on Intergovernmental Coordination and Non -Local Funding,
elsewhere in this report (see pages 11. 13 and 16).
ISSUE 2: KiNG'S POINT BOAT LAUNCH SITE
2.1 That development of a temporary King's Point site proceed as soon as
practical after a DNR Commi ioner's Order is filed establishing that the
launch is temporary until at least April 1, 1991, and will be closed
earlier upon the opening of an equal or better alternate site in zone 5,
not on Halsted's Bay.
2.2 That the Metropolitan Council and other involved governmental bodies begin
immediately the process of planning and acouiring a regional park entity
on Lake Minnetonka.
2.3 That the final disposition of the Kings Point site not be Decided at this
time, but be reviewed by the Metropolitan Council on an annual basis until
April 1, 1991.
2.4 If by April 1, 1991, no alternate equal or better access is found and
insignificant progress has been made tD that end, that a permanent boat
launch site be constructed at Kings Point.
ISSUE 3: NON -LOCAL FUNDING FOR COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH LAND -RELATED DEVELOPMENTS
3.1 the costs to municipalities and other operating agencies for providing
free public access to Lake Minnetonka should be itemized and confirmed by
LMCD and the municipalities.
3.2 LMCD should develop recommendations to meet costs of providing free public
access to Lake Minnetonka from a non -local source at a level commensurate
with expenditures municipalities make to provide access to users outside
their constituency.
ISSUE 4: NON -LOCAL FUNDING FOR ON -LAKE COSTS
4.1 Funding sources should be found and adequate allocations made to support
the agencies carrying out needed activities on the lake.
The following alternatives are recommended:
1. An increase in the beating safety fund and an increase it grants from
that fund made by the state to operating agencies. There are two possi-
ble sources from which the fund may be increased. The first possibil-
ity is that the Minnesota Legislature can increase the allocation made
to the boat safety account from existing sources. Second, added reve-
nues can come to the fund from increased boat license fees in
Minnesota. An increase in beat fund revenues should be followed by an
increase in grants to the c0 ve agencies. The increase should be
above the current base operating allocations and should be distributed
by a supplementary formula that recognize; and encourages local effort.
2. LMCD and other authorized agencies should maximize revenues from permit
fees, marina fees and other development and commercial use fees. The
task force recognizes that such fees are normally able to cover the
cost o` services at best, thus are not likely to constitute a signif-
icant source of revenue for new activities.
3. Some MCTFLM members continue to urge consideration for a special
license fee for all boats using Lake Minnetonka. The advantages of
such a program lie in its equity and its direct tie to users.
Task force members recognized the difficulty of such an approach, which
lies in the perception of many decision -makers Itatewide who fear that
a special sticker for any one lake will open the floodgates to demands
for a sticker for every major lake in the state. Ciearly, this alter-
native requires majo, legislation changing the way license revenues are
raised.
4. Thi LMCD tar: levy should be outside the Lakeshore communities' levy
limits and should be levied directly.
ISSUE 5: INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ON LAKE MINNETONKA
5.1 That the LMCD become the lead agency to convene a meeting or series of
meetings of representatives of all agencies/governmental bodies with
authority on Lake Minnetonka, to identify and analyze overlapping authori-
ties on the lake and to develop a mcmorandum of understanding which would
specify each agen;y's role and responsiblities.
5.2 That some revision in authorities on Lake Minnetonka take place which
would incorporate present structures and authorities, expand authorities
for certain existing authorities and expend new funds to achieve certain
objectives. A schedule for the changes i€ included in the recommendation.
a. The LMCD should become more active, continuing to use is present
powers to carry out its functions, including regulation of lake use and
a lake-wiae access plan, but with a wider exertion of its authority
(which may need to be increased in certain areas) to coordinate
2
planning and implementation of other activities in the la..e shore
communities which effect lake surface use. LMC -hould become the lead
agency for comprehensive plan review and planning for use of the lake.
This function should be consistent with Metropolitan Council planning
coordination, as it may pertain. LMCD should dlso adopt certain more
restrictive ordinances on lake use, as it has recently done on the DWI
ordinance. A suggested specific example would be to further reduce
night-time and peak use time speed limits.
The LMCD, cooperatively with DNR and the Sheriff's Water Patrol, should
continue and expand its educational activities.
b. Hennepin County should continue its present activities on the lake
through the Sheritf's Water Patrol and the lake maintenance operations
of the Department of Transportation. The MCTFLM, Minnesota DNR and
LMCD agree that expansion of the Sheriff's Water Patrol, which has
occurred ever approximately the last ten years, should continue until
t'�e patrol is at a strength fully equal to its responsibilities, which
have increased with added public use. County DOT maintenance must also
grow to match increases in public use.
c. A principal recommendation is that a rf.gior.al recreation open space
implementing agency, most logically the Suburban Hennepin Regional Park
District (SHRPD), should prepare a master plan and acquire, develop and
operate a regional recreation open space entity on the laKe. The facil-
ity should be consistent with applicable plans and should incorporate
existing regional properties, other new parcels in the lake and on the
lakeshore which may be necessary for its function as a significant
regional recreation facility. The facility should provide the follow-
ing regional functions, among others: staging areas for ferry or other
access to islands in the regional park, shoreline access and docks for
fishing, areas for viewing the lake and shoreline, parking and -kan,itary
facilities, and boat rentals. Appropriate launch facilities for small
craft and fishing boats should be included, especially in zones 3 and
5. The plan should be prepared by the implementing agency, reviewed by
LMCD and DNR and approved by the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space
Commission and Metropolitan Council. In the event that SHRPD is unable
or unw;''' -i to implement the proposed new regional facility, LMCD
shoul,' uested to carry out the task as a regional implementing
agent, . e latter event, modification of L'ICD's legislative
authori be required (see Appendix C).
d. Minnesota ur1R should continue its present activities on the lake
including:
- Providing enforcement by conservation officer patrol including
recent expansion in the amount of hours spent on the lake by sr.
increased enforcement staff.
- Continue to carry out its other statutory responsibilities for such
tasks as permit review and wetland, lake bottom and water protection.
- Continue to implement those parts of the 83TF recommendations which
lie within its authorities, but with closer coordination: with LMCD
with particular respect to the selection (i.e., needs assessment,
priorities and process for selection) of boat launch and/or shore-
3
line access sites and for research about lake use. The Commissioner
of iNR shou'd specificall;, confer with LMCD as an ad hoc participant
in its process of developing a plan for lake access. DNR should
strive to implement the 83TF plan and other future actions on Lake
Minnetonka which affect public access to the lake in a manner which
is consistent with applicable plans.
e. Other authorities are responsible for various parts of the overall
management and protection of lake Minnetonka. Examples include MCWD,
Carver County, MnOOT, the lake communities, and there are others
still. All should continue, no recommendation of the MCTFLM should be
interpreted as calling for a reduction n those activities.
5.3 Funding s required to support the activities recommended in 2 above, as
follows. Present funding is too limited to carry out the recommended
expanded activity.
a. LMCD is currently funded fro,.i two principal sources: revenues from
marina licensing and a levy upon its member municipalities. To carry
out its increased and more proactive role, MCTFLM recommends:
i) That the support received from member municipalities be continued tc
LMCD, wit 'n the currently authorized millage limit but with the
change that the levy become a special levy not subject to the statu-
tory limits set on the municipalities. This would confer greater
visibility on a major funding source for the more active LMCD as
well as make the task of raising the funds easier for the
municipalities.
2) That the support received from marina regulatory fees be continued
and maximized to the extent reasonable and proper. While some
increased revenues may be realized from this source, they will
probably not be adequate of themselves. This source may be affected
by discussions going on in the state regarding the authority to
charge fees for any commercial activity in which a state resource,
such as a water bod,, or its bottoms, is used by entrepreneurs.
3) That LMCD receive increased funds from oth,. Man its levy for its
planning and regulatory activities which gc eyond the local inter-
est. Those funds could appropriately be ft-a a boating safety
source as they will serve to increase boati g safety through
research and education.
h. Hennepin County
1) The Sheriff's Water Patrol is currently funded in part from state
boatin afety funds and in part from the Hennepin County budget.
The sources appear appropriate to MCTFLM which suggests that some
increase is appropriate from the state boating safety source kthis
source and its expansion is discussed below) for in.-reases in
enforcement, which benefit all users, and for increased activity in
safety planning and education. Some increase in Hennepin County
funds to the Sheriff's -atrol are also appropriate in light of the
fact that the great maiority of Lake Minnetonka users are from
Hennepin County.
4
2) Similar arguments for increased county support of the county DOT
maintenance operations appear appropriate, based on the majority
percent of usership from Hennepin Count;.
c. Regional Recreation Open Space
1) Acquisit')n and development dollars for new regional recreation open
space features on the lake should come from a special a,propriation
of state bond funds as an additional elerrrent in the Regional
Recreation Open Space Capital Improvement Program. La►e Minnetonka
qualifies as a regional resource and the opportunity to do something
significant occurs here. There have been other instances (e.g..
Como Zoo) where the legislature has recognized that a special area
or project merits special funding for resolution of a critical
situation. It should be treated in such a way as to enable a timely
solution without handicapping the long-range plans for orderly
development of the rest of the regional system.
2) Operations and maintenance funds for a regional recreation open
space agency are another important consideration. If a major new
entity is funded for quick development, a rapidly increased operat-
ing burden is placed on the operating agency. Given the general
condition of operating budgets today, this could be a real impedi-
ment to action. MCTFLM recommends that this project receive a
timely special supplement during "start-up" which will provide ade-
quate dollars for the agency to begin operations and make provisions
for continuing support in its regular operating budget process.
This sort of problem wa- specifically addressed in the Metropolitan
Council's position statement on regional recreation 0 6 M; no new
direction appears necessary. (See Appendix D, the Council's posi-
tion statement on -egional 0 b M supplementary funding.)
d. State boating safety fund increases are recommended. The fund could be
increased by legislative action increasing the annual allocation from
existing sources. Added revenue to the safety fund could also come
from increased boat license fees. A substantial portion of the
increased safety funds should be granted for special projects to active
agencies such as Hennepin County Sheriff's Patrol and the LMCD to
support boating safety services. Increases to the agency grants should
be tied to inc-eased local effort.
The MCTFLM also considered the issue of a separate license or sticker
as a source of revenue from boaters or Lake Minnetonka. The task force
found the source attractive for its applicability and equity but recog-
nized the policy issue it raises, namely, should DNR then require a
special sticker for every lake in the state which is attractive to
arge groups of boaters? The issue is a major problem to a lake
license approach.
S.4 The MCTFLM recommends the following schedule:
a. Implementation of the recommendations of the 1983 task force for park-
ing, new boat launches, and shoreline access should be carried out, or
a firm schedule for thei► impleme-itation agreed to, by the end of
calendar year 1987. The actions w'll be carried out by DNR, LMCD and
specific affected municipalities.
E
b. A legislative recommendation for capital and operating funding of the
new regional recreation open space entity, based upon a general plan
prepared by the implementing agency should be completed and agreed to
by the agency, DNR, and Metropolitan Council in time for presentation
to the 1987 legislature.
c. A legislative proposal for the increased or moiified authorities fo.
LMCD and the recommended chance in is levy structure should be pre-
pared by October 1986 for presertation to the 1987 legislature.
d. A legislative proposal to increase revenues to the state boating safety
fund from either existing soirces or from increased boat license fies
should be prepared by October of 1986 for presentation to the 1987
legislature.
e. The specifics of new boat launch site selection, to be worked out by
LMCD, DNR, Metro Council and the regional implementing agency, are
dependent in part upon events at King's Point. Installation of a
temporary boat launch at King's Point in 1956, with a clear DNR intent
to install a permanent launch site after April 1, 1991. seems to be
adequate stimulus for LMCD, M;r sta and the other south shore/upper
lake commun;ties to cooperate. seems logical that DNR, Metro
Council, the regiona! imp:%:menting agency, LMCD and the municipalities
might. all participate in finding the site, with nNR reserving 'ts
intent and authority to proceed at King's Point 1 no specifics
emerge.
5.5 Metropolitan Council staff shall report to the Metropolitt. Systems Com-
mittee on activities on Lake Minnetonka by LMCD, SNRPD and other active
agencies by Jan. 15, 1987. If no progress or inadequate progress is the
case, as judged by Metropolitan Council, an increasingly directive proce-
dure should begin. Three possibilities have been advanced for courses c'
action in that event, others may exist.
- Action could be initiated by Metropolitan Council and other interested
partiies for legislation to reconstitute LMCD. In discussions about
the possibility, MCTFLM suggested a new governing board, drawn from non -
lake communities plus representatives of other interested governments
and agencies, with a reduced number of representatives from the lake
communities. Other changes in the LMCD's enabling legislation would
also be needed.
- Critical Area designa'ion is a second more directive alternative
considered.
- Metropolitan Significance Review was the third.
In any event, the decision to proceed with a stronger directive to achieve
implementation appears as an important part of this task force recom-
mendation if timeiy action does not occur.
b
ISSUE 6: MUNICIPAL POLICIES WHICH nELATE TO LAKE USE AND DEVELOPMENT ON THE LAKE
b.l That the report of the MCTFLM describe the issue and recommend it as a
priority issue to be addressed by LMCD. LMCD has excellent access to the
municipalities fey- data. Staff assistance, i.e., technical assistance,
could reasonably come to LMCD from the Metropolitan Council, because of
that staffs-xperience in comprehensive planning and zoning issues. A
useful product of this study, among others, could be an inventory or those
parts of Lake Minnetonka i, shoreline where boat launching and other public
shoreline access are not prohibited by policy or zoning conflict. With
this inventory, decisions about future public access could be based on a
more realistic view of what is and is not possible under current local
plan controls.
ISSUE 7: COMMERCIAL ACCESS TO THE LAKE
7.1 That the MCTFLM repot describe the issue and recommend further study on
use from commercial access as an important data source to guide several
surface use decisions. Specifically, it would be very helpful to deter-
mine the following characteristics about users from commercial access
points:
- Numbers and use times;
- Type of use; and
- Origin, destination and zones or sub zones of greatest use.
The information should be acquired with other information in the process
recommended by MCTFLM which calls for a more active LMCD, working in con-
junction with continued research by DNR and by the Metropolitan Council.
ISSUE 8: RESEARCH ON RECREATION USE OF LAKE MINNETONKA
8.1 There should be expanded use monitoring, especially for peaks and length
of peaks. 7herc seems to be some opinion and data that suggest level or
declining peak use. This needs substantiation.
8.2 There should also be soma origin -destination work done on boaters. Where
they put in and where they go on the lake would help in locating future
access. This is relatively easy to do, but it requires interviews of
users at all access types.
8.3 Data on potential increases in all types of access is needed. This means
monitoring of shoreline development, local plans for this kind of develop-
ment and plans for undeveloped land in what might be cal'ed the "service
area" of Lake Minnetonka. Methods and data exist to gauge changes in
public access use, but similar systematic data is not available for other
types of access. Increased development in communities surrounding Lake
Minnetonka will probably put pressure on surface use of the lake by
increasing demand for all types cf access. This will be particularly
important as the proportion of use arising from L.,fferent kinds of access
becomes more clear.
7
8.4 The last research need is all inclusive. A systematic research program is
needed on Lake Minnetonka. Every potential action implemented on the lake
to correct problems will needed complete evaluation --it's simoly that kind
of environment. A cooperative, jointly funded, jointly designed research
program is needed. No one agency can justify the budget needed to proceed
on its own. In addition, the variety of interests served by lake
Minnetonka make it difficult for any one agency to achieve the credibility
needed here.
8
41886.7 i'l
TO: Mayor and City Council �`
�i
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato 1
DATE: April 18, 1986
SUBJECT: Liquor on the Lake
Our L.M.C.D. representat ve JoEl len Hur. r will be present at the
meeting on the 28th to briefly discuss with you two issues that
relate to liquor on the lake.
1. Boating While into (BWI) - While it is our
understanding that the legislature did pass a
boating while intoxicated law generally for the state,
that LMCD has gone ahead enacted an ordinance that does
prohihit boating while intoxicated with the various
mandates requiring people to submit to variou:;
i)reathalyzer tests etc. She will discuss enforcement of
the ordinance and the expectations they have for such an
ordinance.
2. Liquor Licenses on the Lake - Prior to t" e 1986
legislature the state was the one with the sole
authority to issu? liquor licenses for the sale of
liquor on Lake Minnetonka (or any other lake in the
state). Through L14CD efforts they were able to pass a
legislation granting LMCO the authority to be the
license insurer, not the state. They were granted up to
14 licenses that they could issue if they felt it
appropriate. JoEllen will discuss what. LMCD intends to
do with their authority and why they felt the
legislation was ne?essary.
')SSD
MOTION -
Moved by
, seconded by , to accept
the
t of
the City
of Orono's"L.M.C.J.
representative. Ayes
cc: JoEllen Hurr
Mi-'I STING
Z Y U NOW
0
APPLICATION NO.
CITY OF OR,ONO NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7:57 Date of Notice: 4/24/86
------------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Ward Ferrell COPIES:
3405 Watertovn Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
------------------------------------------------------------------
TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX variance
----- ----------------------------------------------------------
bATE OF MEETING: 4/28/86 VOTE: 4 For 1 Against
COrTNCIL ACTION - MOTION:
Direct staff to draft a resolution of denial. This resolution
w4_11 be drafted and presented for final council action at the May
'.2, 1986 Council Meeting.
If you desire certified copies of the of f..,.1a 1 : our, -i l minutes,
they are available from the City Recorder or Cit Clerk after
review anr3 Approval by the City Cc.unci 1.
�j�aUNWL 4REHING
APR2�1 ^
To: Orono Council Members CITY Y OF
From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrato
Date: April ia, 1986
Subject: #819 William S, Mills, 200 Leaf Street -
FAral Plat App.,oval - Resolution
This plat received preliminary subdivision approval on
September 23, 1985, subject to repair of th- existing septic
sy: tem in the spring of 1986. Although the stem has not yet
bet n repaired due to weather and ground cond ,.ions, all other
final plat r-quirements have been met. Staff would recommend
final plat ;roval per the atta hed resolution, subject to a
permit for septic system repairs being obtained by applicants
contractor pr:_or to the city's filing of the plat with Hennepin
County.
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
A RESOLUTION "PROVING THE PLAT OF
SWAB LAKE SECOND ADDITION
FILE NO.819
WHEREAS, the City of. Orono is a muricipal corpc Lion
organized and existing under the laws of ,te of Mini.. ota;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council City of Orono has
adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and
safe development of land within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the
application for a subdivision by William S. Mill7" the
subdivider; and
WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meetall
standards of the RR-1B zoning district finding that each lot is
of a size and configuration that will allow its use as a single
family residence to be fully developed without the need of any
variances, tend
WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements
of the platting regulations of the City, including:
1. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility
easements.
2. Dedication to the City of a Flowage and Conservation
Easement providing for limitations on the usF of wet:Ands
and/or drainageways .described therein and show,, cn the plat
as "drainage ea:J.-meats".
3. Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fee in the
amount of $200.00.
d. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of
the plat, ease►n.-nt.s and covenants In the amount of
$100.00.
W M, THEREFORR BE IT RESOLVL+D, t), t the City Counc ti of
to City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Swan Lake Ser.ond
Addition, Hennepin County, . nnesotz"; su_> ject to the following
conditions:
City of ORC)NO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
1. Lot 1 shall grant a driveway easement in favor of lot
for access over the existing driveway, which shall be used
by both properties as a shared drivewa•.
2. The applicants contractor shall obtain a permit for
repair of the existing septic system on lot 2 prior to
filing of this plat.
3. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by -he City of Orono
with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office on or before
October 28, 1986 together with a certified original copy of
this Resolution and executed copies of the documents noted
above.
The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if
the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that
event, it wi 1 1 be necessary to file a new applicati with the
City of Orono for subdivision review.
Dated this 28th day f)f Apri), 1986.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Maycr
iCOND ADDITION:
ti��5nl towa,.rfvef�s761aipwdiaaabr
Vu4r ahrnn:n a..tpn7RAAp Mn nurlal,NALdv.O •nn
L
• � �` \ e,�XrJ
a� 11
/.._ .... j
w
COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC.
ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, PLANNER'',
LONG LAKE, MINNESOTA
KNEW AtI.MWIS'9f T!'ESE••P.tM! y,•i ThXt'Wl?!Fate S: T1I;ls and Terri L. Mllisr� ---
husband end wife, owners, and First Minnesota Savings Bank, F. S. B.. a United
States of America Corporation, mortgagee of the following described property R.T. Doe. N o,
situated In the County of Hennepin. State of Minnesota. -to wit:
Lot 7, Block 1, roan Lake Addition, accordlnq to the plat thereof on file or of record In the office of the
Registrar of Titles In and for said County,
have cause-1 the se^e to it surveyed end platted as SWAN LAKE SECOfrd ADDITION, and do hereby donate and dedicate to the public
for public use forever the drainage and drainage end utility easements as shun on the plat.
In witness whereof said Willi" S. Mills and Terri L. Hills, husband end rlfe, have hereunto set their hands this day
of 199 and First Minnesota Savings Bank, F. S. B.. a United States of Amerlce Corporation has cauie.T!re..e
pre;ens o slgnewT�y In proper officers and,lts corporate seal to be hereunto affixed thls day of
I98 _
FIRST MINNESOTA SAVING; BANK, F. S. 8.
Willies S. Mills By
Terri L. Mills Its
Its
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF ) The foregOing Instrurr t was acknowledged before me this day of 199_, ty
Will lam S.7f'iTis and Terri L. Mills, b-itba,d and rife,
Notary Public, County, Minnesota
STATE OF MINNESOTA) My cce.lsslon expires
COUNTY OF ) The fore0oing Instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 199 , by
Its and -- — Its
o Irst . nne:o.e ar nqs en r. .,, a nl a .a,es o nc.rjc wrRory von, on mall
o ,e corpora von.
Notary Public, County, MI nnesota
My cccclss l on exp— rie'T"
II 1 hereby certlfy.that I have surveyed and platted the Property described on this plat as SWkM LAKE SECOND ADOITION: that this
II 0,1
Is a correct representation of srid survey; that all distances are correctly shore In feet and hundredths of a foot; tnat
dl sionvaents are
lYrn
correctly placed In the ground as shorn; that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated en
1� said plat; and that there en no public highways to be desl mated on said plat.
Mark S. Gronberq, Land Surveyor and Er meer
STATE OF MINNESOTA) Minnesota License *-.bar 12255
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregOing Instrument was acknowledged before as this day of T98_, by Mark
S. Gronberg, Land Surveyor and Engineer.
Notary Public, Hermepin County, MI me sots
My mass Isslon expires
ORONO. MINNESOTA
This plat of SWAN LAKE SECOND ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Orono. Minnesota at a
regular meeting thereof held this day of t9e . if applicable, the written conatnts and recommendations
of tte Coaalssloner of Transportat cT n and trio Coun'-TAi;.-df— EnglneOr have been received `y the Clty, or the prescribed 30 csy
period has elapsed without receipt o/ such caaeents and recomaendatlons, as provided by Minn. Statutes, Chsptrr SOS.Os, Suod. 2.
Mayer
left
PROPERTY TAX AMJ PUBLIC RECORDS DEPARTMEM ;NTT, MINNESOTA
I hereby certify that Lases payable In I- .ears have been paid for land described on this Plat. Dated this
day of
DALE G. FOLSTAD, HENNEPIN COUNTY AUDITOR
By Deputy
SURVEY DIVISION, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Pursuant to Chapter 810. Minnesota Laws of 190, thls plat has been approved this dry of 196
ROBERT L. BAKKA, 1'ERKE9I4 COUNIrm7il m— —
Br
REGISTRAR OF TITLES. HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNE50TA
I hereby certify that the -(thin plat of SWAN LAKE SECOND ADDITION ra; filed for record In this office this der of
198, at _ o'clock _. M. --
R, DAN CARLSON, REGISTRAA OF TILES
By—__________._.__• Deputy
SWAN LAKE SECOND ADDITION I
16g5d taw wfdapre/++�!/rid is wtm.n
e — ✓uwWwn.ra..(pn7UWASMU/. ,"Ko-nos
8rwp✓ ni�i�S9e tiN�y. %6rJ�/►feF
ti
'1 wv_rL--_�
��ALE IN FEET
DENOTES IRON MONUMENT
BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED
COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC.
ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS,PLANNER�
LONG LAKE, MINNESOTA
AN 2 31986
To: Orono Council. Members 'rt" ! OF PRIN
From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator
Date: April 24, 1986
Subject: #998, Maureen S. Bellows, 265 Brown Road South
- Final Plat Approval - Resolution
The applicant has complied with all conditions set forth by
the city at preliminary approval. Staff recommends approval of
the plat, Byfield, subject to the conditions set forth in the
enclosed resulution.
City cif ORO1NO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF
HYFIRLD
PILE NO.998
WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has
adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and
safe development of land within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the
pplication for a subdivision by Maureen S. Bellows,the
subdivider; and
WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all
standr•ds of the RR-lB zoning district finding that each lot is
of a z 1 ze and conf iguration that wi 11 a 1 low its use as a single
family residence to be fully developed without the reed of any
variances, and
WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements
of the platting regulations of the City, including:
1. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility
easements.
2. Dedication on the plat of right-of-way for a public road
shown as County Road 146.
3. Dedication to the City of a Flowage and Conservation
Easement providing for limitations cn the use of we' lands
and/or drainageways described therein and shown on tl.i plat
as "drainage easements".
4. Payment to the City of a Fark Dedication Fee in the
amount of $200.CO.
5. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing --)f
the plat, easements and covenantE in the amount of
$150.00.
NOW, THEREFORE DR IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Byfield, Hennepin
County, Minnesota; subject to the following conditions:
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
1. Proposed home and all accessory structures on lot 1
must meet all setback requirevents of the RR-lB zoning
district.
2. Applicant must obtain access permit from Hennepin
CcMu,ty prior to relocation of the driveway. This is to be a
shared driveway serving both lots.
3. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono
with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office on or before
October 28, 1986 together with a certified original copy of.
this Resolution and executed con -Les of the documents noted
above.
The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if
the pla. has not been filed by the date specified above. In that
event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the
City of Orono for subdivi•ion review.
Dated this 28th day of April, 1986.
ATTEST:
City Clerk Na ya r
C)
I evil!
I ' r
N M IMmr•m
1
g
`AIL
F(1
,�rty,E
R
o tD
Ili I
�
I
I
O
Z
U
�
Ir
0
�y
-- 4told
! li
eI
1 rwPl3'.
91 7t I
s&PAY
r
a�
1
/ r�M• �N Ye
aw.
RS
1.11011 All 1'l NSONS NY tilt SI 1'NI Simi% it.,, (1_1es S. Bel tors, Jr and
Maureen Steele tlellnw s, hull,a a
rrr uwnrrs of the luIfor Ing a,,r "'ell property sl haled In lilt County of Ilennepin. State 0/ Mlnneto n,4l, I.
Is n 1
the I nl ?at' feet of that part of the last half of the Northwest Quarter, Section 1, township It/. Range 2)
lying Lween tilt Southerly right-of•way Ilne of the Chicago and North western Railway Company and the North
Ilne of the South 900 feel of said East Half of the Northwest Quarter, Hennepin County, Minnesota,
have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as BTFIELD
ic
for Public Use forever the road, drainage. and dralnaye and utility n easeeentsd do b is d Shown on onate dthe
dl ate to the public
Plat.
In witness whereof said Charles S. Bellows, Jr. and Maureen Stetle Bellows, husband and wile,
their hands this day of 198 hive hereunto set
Charles S. ael:t,,.
Maureen Steele Bellows
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing Instrument WAS ecknorl edged before ■e thls
by Charles S. Bellows, Jr, and Maureen Steele Bellows, husband and wife, day of _ 198
Notary Public, Hennepin County, Minnesota
My commisslon expires
1 hereby certify that 1 have surveyed and platted the property described on init plat 1$ BYF ELD ; tha
t this
Plat Is a correct represenUtton of sold survey; that all distances are correctly shorn In feat and hundredths of
a loot; that All monuments have been correctly Placed In the ground as shorn; and that the outside boundary Imes
are correctly designated on said plat.
Mark S. 6ronDerp, Lend Surveyor and Engineer
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
Minnesota license Number 12155
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before so this
by Mart S. Gronberg, Land Surveyor and Engineer. day o/ 198
Note- r11C. Hennepin County, Minnesota
My cv .Ion expires
OROMO, MINNESOTA
This plat of BTFIELD was approved and accepted by the City Council ting therapy held this 01 the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular
meeday o/
of the Commissioner of Transportation and tM Count M19hra Engineer the written
D comments
and
o or
scriDad ]0 day y Highway y, pre -
Scribed period has elapsed without receipt or such tangents and recommendations, as provided by Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 505.03, Subd• 2.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA
Mayor
Clerk
PROPERTY TAX AND PUBLIC RECORDS DEPARTMENT, HENNEPIM Call MTV, MINNESOTA
I hereby certify that texts payable In 19B and prior years have been Vold for land described on this plat.
Dated title day of _
198
DALE G. FDLStAD, HENNEPIN COUNTY AUDITOR
By Deputy
SURVEY DIVISION, HENNE►IN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
/vrseset to Chapter aid, Minnesota Lars of 1969. this plat has been approved this day or 198
ROBERT L. BABBA, HENNEPIN COUNT► SURVE ►oR
By-..--
hereby
OF
I 111" S, HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOIA
Aer•By cNllI? that the within plat of BT/leto was I'lled In♦ record In this office this
. .. -- Ila at o'rin"k
M
m DAN 14151im Dial $IRAR Ill 11 it IS
wr Ile prrt/
Y'YFIELD `�
i k
S.Ii- 3
K — — ------- -- I
T--
L
3 sr AIT- T7-- ov, 33
'e3o,
1, 130DO
.,L,:z M
r
a—f. of S.nlcw 3
L
c;
it
0 1 i wj /
LOT
W94sec MOM
9"00 0 SWIM 5
so 0 W Im
SCALE IN Frf r COFFIN a GRONBERG. WC, .0 low w-
,,()FNOrf; IfKW Aot(INUMENr I NG,1NfFW;. L4?40 %uRvfRM, PLANNERS
fIFARINGS SIVINNARF ASSAMED f(PW, I AMI,
CJUNC;4 'M� EfING 6
JtPP,2r1 10, ^r
10
CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice 4/18/86
----------------------------•--------------------- -------------------------
TO: Copses To:
Duane F. Hall
1860 Shadywood Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance/Subdivision
---------•--------------------------------------------------------------
Date of Meeting: 4/14/86 Vote: 5 For 0 Against
COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION:
To table all discussic, and action on your application until you or an
authorized representa4-ve is able to attend the Council meeting. The
Council was aware of �oV- request for Council action in your absence
but the City Attorney ed against any discussion or action in your
absence. Your subdivision/variance application will be re -scheduled
before the Council c' their April 28, 1986 meeting. Please advise if
Tither you or an authorized agent will attend in your place.
If you desire copies of the official Council minutes, they are available
from the City Recorder or City Clerk after review and approval by the City
Council.
TO: Mayor Bitler
Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator
Orono Council Members
FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
DATE: April 24, 1.986
SUBJ: 01000 Wm. Wear, 2160 Wayzata Blvd.
Variance t-o Fence Ordinance
#1009 Wm. Wear, 2160 Wayzata Blvd.
Variance to Moratorium for
within Highway 12 Corridor
List of Exhibits -
A - Application 1100'
r - Property Owners i,ist
C - Moritorium Ordinance
D - Planning Commission Minutes 2/18/86
E - Council Minutes 1/13/86
F - Planning Commission Minutes 12/16/85
- Site Plan
b - Plan for Sign
I - '�?ichfield Ordinance
properties located
Revia of Apl,' cation #1009
At s Council .=aeting of January 13th, Council table all action
on riance app;icati.on #1.000 because the original plans
subt:,itted by the al,, licant were not consistent with the sign
improvements referenc,1 by applica,it:. Mr. Wear was asked to
submit a revised plan for -nuncills consideration.
Since that meeting staff schedu;-d a variance to the Highway 12
moritorium before the Planning Con,,. -scion at their February 18th
meeting. Planning Commission recommei,_'-d approval of a variance
per Section 6 of that ordinance findi,.-T the provosal is not
contrary to the intent of. the Comprehensive c7onmu.ity Management
Plan and that it does not adversely impact tht- hen lth, safety or
welfare of the general public. Planning Commission advised hat
at this point in t.je Highway 12 corridor study, it cannot be
determined if Mr. Wear' igns will meet standarc,, yet to be
decide' upon. (Review Exhibit D)
St.."f has enclosed a copy of the sign ordinance from the City of
Richfield's ordinances submitted to st .ff by our consu: tent
planner, John Shardlow, as an example of recently adol.ted
performance standards for si.gnage (exhil,'t I).
Review of they __ Revised Sign Plan for the Orono_ Shopping Center
a )� Area of Sign
Roulette Sign, = 4' x 1 -112' 6 s.f.
International Tours = 3-1/2' x 3-1/2' lZ:''. s.f.
Mexican Eatery = 3-1/2' x 3-1/2' 12.3 s.f.
Time/T-?�mp. = 4' x 1-1/2' 6 s.f.
TOTAL SIGNAGf; ARF,A = 36.6 or 37 s.f.
Zoning 1 ;le #1000 & .109
April 24, 1986
Page 2 of 4
b) H*.ight Sign
Proposed Sign = 21'
Allowed Sign - R:)'
^) Sign Location
Required - 10'
Proposed = 27' west & south of tree -
west side of most eastern acces_ - See ExY A
Total signage area has b(-An determined at approximatel, 37 s.f.
of that 6 s.f., is a Time f'.'empvi rvpv .zre area. Should this area be
credited as commercial i.:.gnage ,gairi-t the Orr^o Shopping Center
- staff would suggest that the 6 s, -ie feet nc ue recognized as
comm-rcial signage. The comme,_-ial signage area credited against
site for proposed sign would i.,e 31 s.f.
Staff has met with Mr. Wear cn the site in order"Co make an
update inventory of current siInage and renters within Shopping
Center.
Brief Review of tha•. In* intory
'i l ' qn 'vlon )ther
I - Little G,k Marke x
2 - Orono Coin Le Ll.d) x k
3 - Engle Foods X
4 - Mexican Eetery
S Hennepin Cty or!,ry X x
o - Dr. Oman x
i - Inte.rnat x x
9 '..,ulette Lj * .eR x
p R Printing x
14- Sunlife x
'.1- Mr. Bil's r.
)t- Dent-ai Resources x
Temporary Sign Permit
for mobile sign no
longer valid
Valid Temp. I-r -:ait
for mobile si5
Zoning File #1000 & 01009
April :4, 1986
Page 3 of 4
Tre current pylon sign can maintai.n signage for six users. In
r(,. ,V,t:)nse to Counci l's concern for conformance of signage - staff
suggests that ID plaques erected on pylon be of a similar style
arc; de.si.cn material - some of the tenants' ID's are overl-)oked or
"over shadowed" by bright litf signs - In other words, all ID
signage plaques on pylon shoulc' be of similar material and style.
The Mexican Eatery, International Tours and Roulette Associates
require signage out on the Highway. The renters request that it
be provided on the eaLt side of the frontage because of their
location on the east side of building. (Coin Laundry 6 little
Oak also on the east side have double exposure) The current
pylon is not. able to provide the additional signage. Staff has
also been ad— sed that the following renters do noi. require
signage at the highway- Eagle Foo-'s, D R Printing 6 Dental
Resources.
If veu have the oppor' ,anity to review the Richfield ordi.. .ice -
not he Orono S►.,,pF Center would sti11 i.ave major problems
beca ;F, of its pait'.c,.,lar shape and location `r. rel.at:., n to the
roac'. The arplacant_ has expressed concern .2 's use of
performance standards from another City. The 'in s merel
presented for comparison consideration. - cle we ►..ub address
our existing sign ordinance.
Council Action -
Conc:eptual direction to staff to draft a resolution of approval
for a sF:ond Free standing sign henceforth referred to as
Director, sign "or the Orono Shopping Center to be located 27
feet off Highwa; 12 right-of-way not to exceed a total height of
21 feet anal not to exceed the commercial si • age allowance of 31
s.f.
The staff resolution should address the fo?lt,ving:
1. Orono Shopping (-enter can mainta.. only 1 temp -nary sign
on site at one time Temporary permits are iss_-ed for no
more than 3 months. Ow.:er of property must coordinate
tempo, sign usage of tenants - owner must continue to
apply all sign permits for property.
2. Di i _Ltory Sign's ID plaque.,.- must be of si mi ' - �,ty 1 e and
design - owner to review all si , plaques wit rig staff
at the time a new tenant requests signage.
3. Owner to begin coordinati )n plan f �rxist:inq pylon
henceforth referred to as Loqo Sign. Owner ,.) review with
zoning staff il' ►eG requests by tf�nants for signac rn Logo
=ign.
Zoning 1 #1000 & #1009
April 24, 1986
Page 4 of 4
4. a) Logo sign limited to signage for six tenants.
b) Directory sign limited to signage for three tenants.
5. Owner/applicant to review current landscape plans with
zoning stuff at time building permit is issued for Directory
-,lgn.
6. Council av .-oves the following signage plan for the Orono
Shopping Cei—ar:
Logo sign = 122 s.f.
Directory sign = 31 s.f.
Wall signage = 240 s.f
393 s.i
Allowed B-1 = 200 s.f.
Allowed B-3 = 380 s.f.
CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION
Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.0U per each additional variance)
Renewal Var:_ance Fee $75.00 (no change from. original application)
After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPERTY LOC 'ION
Site Address �7/4 v
Property Identification Numb` r ( P. I . D. ) C10
Please check one -- Is the property abstract or -�� torrens?
Please at-tach legal description to applir :ion if not included on required
survey.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT
Name - - %��i�-= Phone 6Z -T 3
M.:iling Address 4,�, e gDG
Name -V 4jfj,0& L!%Z,2, Phone
Mailing Address 5- 4-
Date Property Acquired /9 G (month/year)
I (do) (do not) also own the ad cenI
rc of d.
--------------------------------- --- -- -- --------i----
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY 1
Present Zoning District
Present Use of Property 4!: Residential
Other (specify)
------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $
Describe request in detail:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VARIANCES REQUIRED
Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover
.3etbacK Variances ( Froi Side Rear)
Other _--�- -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(OVER)
HARDSH'P
Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict
enforcement of zoning regulations:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS
Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code
Requirements:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
1. Completed Application Form.
2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list
from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Gove:_nment Center 348-3271 )
3. Stamped, legal si zed envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the
above list with no return address.
4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required.
5. Plat Map.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember
that your variance application is not complete if the above 1 formation has not
been included.
APPLII:ANT' S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by
the Zoning Administrator, agrees to payallfeesand/or unusual expenses incurred
in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true
and correct to the best of iris/her knowLLdge.
�- - ��
Tpplicant's sign ert_ure-�------ -1..-� Date
OWNERS SIGNATURE
The owner herevy acknowledges and agrees to this application ai,.i fur --her
authorize:; reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, r-onsultants,
agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of irrvest.igation
and verification of this request.
Owner's signature !�� Date
------------_.-------------------------------------------------------------
Applicant. must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the
Planning Commission Mee-tinq. P1i7nning Commission Menting_i are held on the third
Monday of each month.
Property owners list #10o9
Rebers Constr. Inc.
3525 Webster
Minneapolis, MN 55416
The Lyman Corp.
405 S. Willow Dr.
Long Lake, MN 55356
Long Lake Ford Tractor Inc
Highway 12 West
Long Lake, MN 55356
2 r
G
ORDINA.'JCE NO. 13, Second Series
A14 ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON
TEES GRANTING OF BUILDING PERMITS, LAID
SUBDIVISIONS, REZONING APPLICATIONS,
CONDITIONAL OR SPECIAL USE PERMITS,
VARIANCES, OR OTHER AUTHORITY FOR
ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE HIGHWAY 12
CO::RILOR AREA AS DESCRIBED HEREIN.
THE CITY OF ORONO ORDAINS:
The Municipal Code of the City of Orono is amended by
adding Ordinance No. 13, Second Series:
SECTION 1. Statement of Poiicy. The City Council
finds that the City is presently faced with the potential of
numerous applications for development in the Highway II Corridor
Area of Orono, which potential has raised new concern for issues
such as the most appropriate use of the land; the compatibility of
loan density residential developmert with commercial development;
the interrelationship between development and highway
accessibility; and, the provision of municipal services to the
area. They City is in the process of reevaluating its
Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and other offi,:ial controls,
as they relate to the development of the Highway 12 Corridor. The
Council finds that there is an overwhelming probabili,y that land
use controls and zoning provisions will need to be updated and
revised as they apply to the Highway 12 Corridor Area. The
Council also finds that such amending is a process that cannot be
accomplished until a detailed study has beer., completed and hearing
held. During his interim period, it is desirable that t►e
Council estab sh a -ides for the benefit of those who wi&'a to
nvelop propetcy in order to bring about savings in public and
-ivate expenditures and to provide to ti-o public guides to future
19
city action.
The Council determines that there is an urgency a.volved because:
of the need to control development during the interim period so
that the benefits of proper planning will not be lost, to prevent
development which may add to the public burden, and to preserve
the status quo pending adoption of these measures so that the City
will not be impaired in its ability to effectuate the purposes and
goals of these planning efforts.
Since enact
reguiations
standards,
during this
effectuatio?
of the zoni
mc-nt nf an amendment will u
concerning permitted land
the granting of various zon
interim period would be de
n of the Comprehensive Plan
nq enabling act, Minn,,,sota
ndoubtedly modify existing
use and zoning performance
inq and permit applications
trimental to the
and contrary to the purpose
SIratutes 55462.351 et seq.
The Council further Lindy that it would be unwise, inproper and
unjust to allow individual development to occur during this study
period to avoid discrimination and unfair advantage to a few to
the detriment of the entire City. Therefore, the Council's ar0d
staff's authority to grant permits or approve app ications
described herein shall not be exercised during the limited term of
this ordinance, except as provided in Section 6.
SECTION 2. Restrictions on the Granting of Permits and
Applications. No building permits for new construction or total
replacement, land subdivision applications, rezoning applications,
conditional or special use permits, variances o- other authority
for additional development in the Highway 12 corridor Area
described in Section 4 shall be granted for any purpose which
would be inconsistent with the intent of this ordinance, including
but not limited to:
A. Single Family Dwellings;
B. Duplexes; and
C. Commercial Development of any sort.
SECTION 3. Exceptions. Because of the Highway 12
Corridor location and nature of existing development in the
restricted area, the City Council hereby grants blanket exception
and variance from the provisions of this Moratorium to allow
issuance of building hermits and/or conlit.ional use permits for
thr. following work, finding after extensive review and study that
;4ch limited exceptions would not adversely affect the status quo,
and would therefore not be contrar; to intent and purpose of
this Moratorium:
A. Buildinq Permits fcr interior remodeling and
renovation of existing dwellings or existing
residential acceS==sort' structures;
B. Building Permits for new residential accessory
structures or additions to exis'.A ng residential
accessory structures except that no variances
shall be permitted-
C. Building Permits for interior remodeling and
renovation of existing commercial buildings or
accessory structures.
SECTION 4. Restricted Area. That portion of the City
of Orono that shall be subject to the restrictions of this
Ordinance is al `he land...
See Exhibit A)
SECTION 5. Duration. This ordinance shall expire
October 7 , 1986, without Council action, or it may b,_
repealed earlier if the Council determines that the requisite
studies have been completed and adopted and that appropriate
evaluation and action, including -any ;necessary revisions of the
Zoning Code, have been finalized. Tree duration of this ordinance
may be extended by adoption of a subsequent ordinance.
SECTION 6. Variances. The Council may grant a
variance to this Ordinance if the Council finds after carefil
review of all the facts that a proposal is not contrary to the
intent of the Comprehensive Community Management Plan, that it is
compatible with the zoning and official control amendments being
considered by the City, and that it does not adversely impact the
health, safety or welfare of the citizens. DuildingPermitr
ranted under this se be reviewed by 'h rimer to
City Council consideration. Buiermits need not be afer`recT
to t e anning Commission for review. --
SECTION 7. Separability. Every section, provision, or
part of this ordinance is declared separable from every other
section, provision, or part; and if any section, provision or part
thereof or action taken hereunder shall be held invalid, it shall
r:)t affect any other section, provision or part.
SECTION 8. This Ordinance shall be published in the
Lake Minnetonka Sun and shall be fective immediately upor,
publication.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on
the 7th day of October �, 1965, b-1 a vote of _
ayes and 0 nays.
ATT�ST:
i
/ 6�drrothy H42iri, City Cler
3402e
Publish week or October 14, 1985
Mary Butle l Mayor
. j
-3-
T
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ; .D FEBRUARY 18, 1986
#1006 CHRIS & DALE PALM continued
Mr. Lindner state; than ,:y were open to suggestions
?nd their main concern was to be able to bring a -940's
house to a livable size & corlition.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaifrc,n noted that there
was no average setback problem.
Planning Commission would like applican* to submit a
final plan eliminating some of the concrete, and
reducing the amount of rroposed hardcover in the 0-751.
Planning Commission reviewed the possibilities and
suggested removal of some portions of hardcover.
There were no comments from the public regarding this
matter and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Goetten, to
recommend approval: variance to allow 0-75' hardcover
addition subject to removal of 0-75' existing structures
to the north & east (A,B, & C); and variance to allow
maximum of 30% (3,078 s.f.) hardcover in the 75-
250'zone; subject to a final proposed site plan being
submitted before the Council meeting for staff review.
Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
i
1009 LLIAM W. WEAR
iiZATA BLVD.
VARIANCE
Bill wear was present for this matter.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth submitted a final sketch of
the propc-ed sign.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Goetten, to
recommend approval of a variance tc the mor.itorium for
the property located within the Hwy. 12 corridor.
Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
FINAL REVIEW OF LOVING AMENDMENT -
ORIGINAL PUBLIC HEARING HELD AUGUST 19, 1985
It was moved by Rovegno, seconded by McDonald, to table
this matter at this time and schedule a special meeting
date of Thursday, February 27, 19a6, at 7:00 PM, at the
Council Char` s to review this matter. Motion, Ayes 5,
Lays 0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
DECEMBER 16, 1985
it was moved by Goetten, seconded by Taylor, to approve
the Minutes of the December 16, 1985 Planning Commission
meeting is submitted. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
u
G--
MINUTEIS OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MF.F:TING HIiId) JANUA;:Y 13, 1986
#996 JAMES MCNAUGHTON continued
suitable under a full -year usage: and in this climate.
James McNaughton was present for this matter and
stated that tiie origin,i 1 proposal was not designed for
permanent daily use,. 'Lt,_ a 1 so noted the need for a turn
arouiid for safe access onto Shadywood Road.
Assibtant Zoning Administrator Gaffron ;urLher explained
the new proposed plan, noting that applicant had
demonstrated he could install a pave(: driveway whic'i
would increase hardcover to just under 35%.
Counci.ln er Frahm stated `tat he felt strongly about
not nt. y additional variances, especially regaruing
harG,)ver, -.o new projects like this one which were
previously -anted a variance to be allowed to be.built.
It wa!, mL)ved by Councilmember Hammerel, seconded by
Counrilmember Grabek to adopt Resolution #1908 approving
th , variance allowing a maximum of 35% hardco, er.
_on, AyF� 3, Nays 1 . Councilmember Frahmm voted nay
ba:;ed on t. s previous comments.
#997 EUGENE ROSENTHAL*
640 TONRAWA ROAD
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, second d by
Councilmember Hammerel, to approve the preliri,_iary
subdivision as propostl. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
#998 MAUREEN S. BELLOWS*
265 BROW- ROAD SOUTH
PRELIM- SUBDIVISION
Charles and Maureen Bellows w, --)resent fur this
matter.
It was moved by Councilmemoer Frahm, seconded by
Cou;i(;i lmember Hammerel, to approve the preliminary
subdivision as proposed. Motion, Ayes 4, N3ys 0.
#100 LLIAM WEhR
ZATA BOULFVARU
VARIANCE
RESOLUTION
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for
a variance to acid additioral signage for shoppi•-Y center
use.
Will -am Wear was present for matter. ye stated
that tie i 3 requerting to }gut a 21° sign ;,y the east
driveway for a tenant which propose, a time and
temperature sign which lists the tenants tme also.
in
MINUTES ES OF THE RHGW If 12 ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 13, 1986
#1000 WILLIAM WEAR continued
Acting Mayor Aaams state(? that he felt ther^ was tUU
much signage already any: that the current signage plan
in that area is disorganzied and feels adversely about
adding another sign.
Mr. wear stated that the previous signage plan was
-bviously n idequate and that the tenants are entitled
to be able to identify th-^selves He noted that the
problen is that there are 3 sides to the 1-uilding.
Councilmembr' �k stated that the drawing of the
p oposed sign : adequate to base approval on.
Acting Mayor Ada►.: tated t1sr - he relt the existing sign
should be red. -signed to meet he applicants needs.
It was moved by Cour,,. i lmember �;rabek, seconu..A by
Counci lmember Frahm, to table this request for f.urti.ar
detail and study. %,otion, Ayes 4, Nay3 0.
#1001 :HARLES GARRITY
2701 KBr.TY AVENUE
VARIANC
RESOLtl'"ION ! 1909
City Ad -inintrzitor R ?r. nhardson explained ti.,_ request to
build a new home on an established residei,tial lot. The
-ariances include: a' �3% lot area b) 25'side setback
variance for the garau c) �% har,'-over variance in the
250-500' zone which st,4-f Lee` - _'.mot because in the75-
250' zone there is only 18% ha, .ccv(!r, it would be an
adequate trade-rf.f. The total har dcovec would L� less
than .he allowed.
Charles and '�rlene rit- were prtsen+- for this rr.atte7
and stateu +-hey i.4 o nrobl m with P1.-Aining
Commi ssion'n recommend;. _ . ons.
Assistant. Zoning `.dministrator Gaffron Ftated tha': the
neighbors have no (,ejection co the prnpos,d plan,.
It was moved by Actin_, :-iayor Adamn, seconA-.% by
Counci lmember HamnereI, to adopt Resolution #1909
a. draft(-d per ' ' anning Co-mi ssio.'s recomm.?ndationF;.
Motior:, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
# 1 t 0 . :;ARPENTvRS CONST . /NR!. P.C. LYMAN
825 'IM CRYSTAL HAY ROAD SOUTH
COND '13NAL USK PERNP?
RKSULUTION 11910
City Admini st ra, , : nhardsoii cxp , - i ne.. he re. Est to
construct an act(ti . iur tt,an exist _ nr �:Ltest hc:! ^ for
a
f—
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD DECEMBER 16, 1985. PAGE 11
#999 EVAN R. MELINE
3598 NORTH SHORE DRIVE
VARIANCES
PUBLIC HEARING 10:03-10:34 PM
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the affidavit of
publication and certificate of mailing.
Even Meline and his associate Bennett G. Belden were present
for this application. Lou and Marilyn Fegers of 3590 North
Shore Drive were: present for the public '.gearing.
Mr. Meline commented that the foundation is still remaining
because they felt by capping the foundation through the
winter it may not shift as much. Also, this should eliminate
water running into the foundation in the spring.
Mr. Fegers congratulated the applicants on their achievement
of tea:ina down the old house. He had no opposition at this
point to ; , proposed house.
Mr. Meline continued to explain that property to the west is
currently owned by the Hennepin County Department of Tran-
sportion. He has tried for months to acquire this property
or a portion of it. This is still pending. At this point
there is no plan for a ge .ge, which may be considered if
additional land is acquired. Currently, -)weer would have to
back out onto County Roar? 51, but there is a shoulder which
extends uut so as not to back directly out into a .cane of
traffic.
Kelley suggested that should additional land be acquired,
perhaps the garage could be located on the Fegers side, thus
both properties would have a backup and construct a 1/2 moon-
shappl drive at the end to eliminate backing onto County Road
sl.
It was moved by Chairn. Callahan, seconded by Sime, to
recommend to table application for a variance for Evan Meline
until the February Planning Commission meeting until the
applicant has the information he is waiting for.
Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0.
ay
L 1'.1 AM WEARZATA BOULEVARD
VARIANCE
PUBLIC ilFAR1NG 10:34-10:40 PM
Zoning Administrator Mahusti noted the affidavit of
publication and certificate of mailing.
William Wear was present for this application.. There was no
one present from the public for the hearing.
MINUTES OF THE 1'I,ANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD DECEMBER 16, 1985. PAGE 121
#1000 WILLIAM WEAR
It was moved by Sime, seconded by Goetten, to recommend
approval of a variance for William Wear for a 78 s.f. of
additional signage for the Orono Shopping Center based on the
following findings:
1. The location, height and size of sign will not I
impair the safety and welfare of the public.
2. The crrrent zoning standards are not compatible with
I
demands of shopping center use.
Approval is based on the following conditions:
1. Al exter.` :r signage is to be restricted to areas
approved by C �y - building signage and 2 director;,
signs.
2. Ai other independent signs in front island or
landscape zone are to be removed. Temporary sign
permits are required for the use of protable signs on
property. Such signs must be stored insile when not in
legal use.
3. Applicant to provide update landscape plan for 1986I
spring season.
otion, Ayes 6, Nays 0.
11001 CHARLES GARRITY
2701 KELLY AVENUE
VARIANCES
PUBLIC HEARING 10:40-11:03 PM
Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted
publication and certificate of mailing.
the affidavit of 1
Charles Garrity was present. William Dunkley of 2709 Walters
Port was present for the public hearing.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the applicant needs an
area variance, setback variance and hardcover variance. She
noted that there is a gravel drive that enters off Kelly
Avenue which is not shown on either survey, thus creating an
existing excess of hardcover on the property. This gravel
drive is already included in the calculations (38% proposed -
8% over). The hlacktop doming in from Walters Port will be
remover] .
-Wv 7-7 pt,
WI
- Al*
International
MIL
NM Tours
ROULETTE &
ASSOCIATES
TIN
4
ff
1'1 ' a 1 10- 29 2
CHAPTER 29
SIGNS
SECTION:
10-29—
1:
Purpose
10-- 29 --
2:
Definitions
10.-21.3--
3:
General Provisions
10-29—
4:
Permitted and Pruhibited Signs
10-29—
5:
Signs Allowed by Permit in R-1, R 1A, R-2, R 3A, R-3B, R 3C Distr:c is
10-29—
6:
Signs Allowed by Permit in B 1, B-2, B-3, 1.1, 1-2 Districts
10--- 29--
7:
Pylon Signs
10-29-.-
8:
Billboards and Other Oft Premises Advertising Signs
10---29—
9:
Off Premise Directional Sign
10--29 -
10:
Perrnit, Inspection and Fee Required
10-29-
11:
Unsafe Sign, Notice
10 --29--
12:
Existing Signs
10-29-13:
Maintenance
10-29--
14:
Removal of Signs
10-29-- 1 PURPOSE: Signs have an impact or, the character and quality of the
environment as a prominent part of the scenery, they attract or repel
the viewing public, affect the safety of vehicular traffic; then suitability or
appropriateness helps to set the tone of the neighborhood. When signs are too
numerous and inappropr;ate, they can downgrades an area, depreciate propeny values,
and discourage investors and visitors. Further, their use violates the rights of other sign
users who have higher standards and values for their community. The following
standards in this Chapter area therefore adopted to regulate signs.
10 -- 29- 2: DEFINITIONS: For purposes of this Chapter, the following words and
terms are defined as follows:
ADDRESS CIGN
ALTERATION
A sign communicating street address only, whether
script or in numerical form.
Refers to any major a terstion to a sign, but shall not
include routine maintenance or painting
10 29 !'
10 29 2
AREA IDENTIFICAI ION A free standing sign which ide wifies the nanie of a
SIGN: residential subdivision consisting of fifty (1k) or more
lots, a multiple residential complex consisting of twenty
(20) or morn units or three (3) or more structures, an
office, business or industrial structure containing three
(3) or more independent concerns. a single business
and/or industrial complex consisting of three (3) or
more separate structures existing on individual platted
lots or as a planned unit development; a mobile home
court: or any integrated combination of the above. Said
sign shall be limiled only to the identification of an area
or complex and shall not contain the name of individual
owners or tenants nor contain advertising.
AWNING: A temporary hood or cover that projects from the wall
of a building, and which can be retracted, folded or
collapsed against the face of the supporting building.
BANNERS Attention -getting devices which resemble flags and are
of a paper, cloth or plastic -like consistency.
BENCH SIGNS: A sign which is afttxed to a bench such as at a bus stop.
BILLBOARD: See off premises advertising sign.
BUILDING FACADE: That portion of any exterior elevation of a building
extending from grade to the top of the parapet wall or
eaves and the enure width of the building elevation.
BUSINESS SIGN: Any sign which identifies a business or group of
businesses, either retail or wholesale, or any sign which
identifies a profession or is used in the identification or
promotion of any principal commodity or service,
including entertainment, offered or sold upon the
premise where such sign is located.
CAMPAIGN SIGN: A temporary sign ; romoting the candidacy of a pemon
running for a governmental office, or promoting an
issue to be voted on at a governmental election.
CANOPY SIGN Any message or identification which is affixed to a
projection or extension of a building or structure,
erected in such a manner as to provide a shelter or cover
over the approach to any entrance of a store, building or
place of assembly
CONSTRUCTION SIGN. A sign placed at a construction site identifying the
project or the name of the architect, engineer,
contractor, financier or other involved part+e;
10 - 2132
10 - 29 7
CRITERIA, SIGN: An Overall sign system for a structure or project to he
established by owner or owner's association (as in the
ease of a condominium) shall include the, following
cornponer height, location, size, number, type, basic
decorative merne, design, decor and material of signs to
he placed on the burldinys or property
DIRECTIONAL Sir iN. A sign erected on public or private property which bears
the address and/or narne of a businPys, institution,
church or other use or activity plus directional arrows or
information on location.
DIRECTORY SIGN: An exterior informational wall :;ign which idesttifies the
names of bUsintisses or tenants served by a common
public entrance to a building.
FLASHING SIGN: An illummated sign upon which the anificial light is not
kept constant in terms of intensity or color at all times
when the sign is illuminated.
FREE STANDING/ SIGN: Any stationary self supported sign nut affixed to any
other structure.
GOVERNMENTAL. SIGN: A sign which is erected by a governmentad unit for
identification or traffic.
ILL.UMIND 0 SIGN: Any sign which is lighted by an artificial light source
either directed upon it or illuminated from an interior
source.
iNFORMATION SIGN: Any sign givir -.formation to employees, visitors or
delivery vehic;, but containing no adve f-tising or
identification.
INSTITUTIONAL SIGN: A sign which identifies the naive and other
c,ha►acter►stics of a public of semipublic institution on
the Rite whem the sign is located.
INTEGRAL SIGN A sign carrying the name of a building, its date of
erection, monumental citations, commernwatrve tatdets
and the iike when carved into atone, concrete or similar
material or made of broatze, aluminum or other
permanent type of construction and made an integral
part of the structure
MARCUEE
MONUMENT SKIN
See Canopy
A sign whose base and structure is positioned ptrmat►ly
on the Around and is typically solid from grade to the
tot) of the structure
I ZIQ
10 .9
MOTION SIGN: Ariv sign which revolves, ►utats,5, hat, any moving parts
or (lives the illusion of motion.
NONPROFIT A corporation organized under Minnesota Statutes,
ORGANIZATION chapter 317, for a purpose not involving pecuniary gain
to its shareholders or merntwts, and pay-ng no
dividends or other pecuniary remuneration, directly of
indirectly, tc its shareholders or members, or a
community or civic group such as the Lions Club,
League of Women Voters, etc.
OFF -PREMISES A billboard, poster panel, painted bulletin hoard or other
ADVERTISING SIGN communicative device which is used to advertise
products, goods, services, ideas or noncommercial
speech which are not excluSively related to the premises
or owner of the property on which the sign is located.
PARAPET: A low wall which is located on a ro•tf of a building.
PORTABLE SIGN. A sign so designed as to be movable from one location,
to another, and which is not permanently attached to
the ,ground, sales display device or structure.
PUBLIC ENTRANCE: Any passage or opening whirh affords entry and access
to a structure by the general public or customer.
PUBLIC ENTRANCE, A public entrance providing access for the utilization
COMMON: and benefit of two (2) or mote tenants or building
occupants.
PUBLIC ENTRANCE, A public entrance Under the exclusive control and
EXCLUSIVE: providing access to one tenant or building occupant
REAL ESTA1 E SIGN: A business sign placed upon a prope-ty advertising that
particular property for sale, for rent or for lease.
ROOF LINE Is defined as the top of the coping; or, when the
building has a pitched roof, as the intersection of the
outside wall with the root,
ROOF SIGN: Any sign which is erected, constructed or attached
wholly or in part upon or over the roof of a building.
ROTATING SIGN. A sign which revolves nr rotates on its axis by
mechanical means.
RUMMAGE SALE: An infrequent temporary display and sale by a"
occupant on his premises of personal property.
including general household rummage, used clothing
and appliance's.
r
I() 9 2
SEHVILE EN 1 HANCE Secondrtry passage or openrlg to a structure which is
intended for delivery and rrtmoval of merrhandise or
goods, and which is not intended as a puhlrr. entram:e.
SIGN: Arty written announcement, declaration,
demonstration, display, illustration, insignia or
illumination used to advertise or promote the interest of
any person or persons when the same is displayed or
placed out of doors in view of the general public, or
inside of a building within three feast (T) of a transparent
window. A sign shall be considered as a structure or a
part of a structure for the purpose of apptyinq yard and
height regulations except as herein provided.
SIGN, GROSS AREA- That area with the marginal lines of the surface which
bears the advertisement or, in the case of messages,
figures or symbols attached directly to the part of a
building, that area which is included in the smallest
rectangle which can be made to circumscribe the
message, figure or syrnW displayed thereon.
SIGN, MAXIMUM The vertical distance measured from the grade to the
HEIGHT OF: top of a sign.
SIGH, MINIMUM The vertical distance measured from the nearest
HEIGHT OF: finished grade to the lower limit of such sign
SIGN, MULTI FACED: Any pylon sign with a sign face oriented to more than
two (2) directions
SIGN, NAME PLATE Any sign which states the name or address or both of a
business or occupant of the lot where the sign is placed
or may be a directory listino of names, addresses and
business of o; cupents.
SIGN, PROJECTING. A sign other than a wall sign which is perpendicular t i
and protects from a building and is supported by a wail
of a building or structure.
SIGN, PUBLIC A sign designatir►g the current time and,)or te.,.perature
INFORMATION and/ or stock market data on the exterro, � ! a buOding or
SERVICE: pylon so as to be viewed by the passing public from a
public fight of way.
SIGN, PYLON: A sign erected on free starxltnj shafts, posts, walls or
piers which are solidly affixed to the ground and not
attached to a building. In P4dition, the term 'sign,
pylon" shall also ►Wean a sign inflated or otherwise
suspended or anchored to moorrn j lines or cables
solidly affixed to the ground or attached to a bui+d►ng A
pylon "r, shall be considered as one sign though a may
have two (2) nr more face
1 IT.,
10 29 2
10 : `.j �
SIGN, HEADER BOARD: Any sign having letters not loamanently affixed to the
sign face. The intent of the changeable copy is to permit
the owner of the sign to , ace rnessages corresponding
to promotions or events at his establishment.
SiGN STRUCTURE The supports, uprights, bracing and framework for a
sign including the sign area.
STREET FRONTAGE: The proximity of a parcel of land to one or more streets.
An interior lot has one street frontage and a corner lot
has two (2) frontages.
TEMPORARY SIGN: Any sign which is erected or displayed for a special
period of time, and not of a permanent nature.
WALL GRAPHICS A sign which is painted directly on an exterior wall
surface.
WALL SIGN: A sign which is affixed to the exterior wall of a building
and which is parallel to the building wall. A wall sign
does not project more than twelve inches (12'') from the
surface to which i! is attached, nor extend beyond the
top of the parapet wall.
WiNDOW SIGN: A sign affixed to or inside of a window in view of the
general public This does not include merchandise on
display
10 29 - 3 GENFRAL PROVISIONS:
(A) No sign permitted by this Title shall, ason of its location, color or intensity,
create a hazard to the safe, efficee twovement of vehicular or pedestrian
traffic, No private sign shall contain words which might be. construed as traffic
controls, such as "Stop", " Cautirsn", "Warning", etc , unless such sign is
intended to direct traffic on the premises.
(B) All signs and sign structures shalt be property maintained and shall be ke— . .
safe, orderly condition. In addition, all signs used on a single building snail tie
constructed of sufficiently permanent materials so that they shall not succumb
to deterioration from weathering Any existing sign w sign structure which rs
rotted, unsafe, deteriorated. defaced or otherwise altered, shall be repamted,
repaired or replaced
1C) No sign shall be attached to hang from any budding until all necessiry wait
and/or roof attachments have Mien approved by the Budding OfficrM.
(D) No iwgn shall be erected, placed or maintained by any person on rocks, fences,
trees or in any other manner which wilf interfere with any e*rj.ric tight, power,
te#ephone or tetegrrrp h wnrS or the supports the!er l
10 29 j 1 I) 29 3
(E) Whcn electrical signs are installed, the rnstallat'on shall be subject to the
Slate's Electrical COde and Wlerhea►1 electriricaf wiring shall not be allowed.
IF) No signs other than governmental signs shall he erected or temporarily placed
within any street rights of w•ry or upon any public lands or easerrmer.ts or rights
of way, except by conditional use permit.
(G) The use of banners, pennants and similar devices is PeVricted to use by
nonprofit organizations and schools, and shall require a permit. The permit
shall be valid for no more than thirty (30) consecutive days. No more than three
(3) permits per applicant shall be granted during any twelve (12) month period
1 he permit shall be prominently displayed during the period of validity.
0l) All signs shall display in a conspicuous manner the owner's name, permit
number and/or registration number and date of erection.
0) No sign or sign structure shah be erected or maintained if it prevents free
ingress or egress from any door, window or fire escape. No sign or sign
structure shall be attached to a standpipe or fire escape.
(J) Window signage shall not ex, eFW, twenty five percent (25%) of the total area of
the window in which they an. displayed. lettering ised in window signage
exceeding three anti wiet-half inches (3 h") in height shall be Oebited against
the total signage permitted,
(K) Fxcept for farm buildings, a minimum of one address sign identifying the
correct property number as iss:gned by the City shall be required on each
principal building in all districts. Such s,!an shall be of sufficient size to be.
;eagiblr 1,om the nearest street yet shall not exceed three (3) square feet in area.
The numbers shall be metal, glass, plastic or durable material and the± numbers
shall not be less than three and one half inches (3'/1 ") in heigh., in a
contrasting color to the base or made of some reflective material and so placed
to be easily sewn from the street.
IL) Sign structures not used for signing for twelve 112) consecutive months shall
be removed.
(M) The City may grant a conditional use permit to locate signs or deccratrons on or
within the right of way for a specified period of time not to exceed sixty 160)
days.
IN) All signs shall be compatible with the bwl(i.ng and area in which they are
locb,ed.
tO) Srpns suppOrtad by guy wore are piWubrted.
IP) Business signs may only be dk,rnrnated during hours the business is open for
business.
(a) No more. tha,+ three (3) flags may be displayed outside of a building
. W
10 ?'.) 4
10 29 4 F't)I'AMED AND PROMBI;ED SIGN
IAI Permitted Signs: P-o fnllnwirig signs are illowerf without a permit in all zoning
districts, but shall comply will- all other applicable provisions of this Tale.
1 Public Signs: Signs of a public, noncommercial nature: to include bafety
signs, danger sigr1q, trespassing signs, traffic signs, signs indicating scenic yr
historic>a, ^oints of interest, memoria+ plaques and the like, when signs arY
erected by or on order of a p..V:-r offit.er or employee in the performance of
official Iuty.
2. Directional Signs (On-5i,cl: On site directional siglIS which contain no
advertrsint,, nut exLeed:ng four W square feet in area, to facilitate the
movernen of pedestrians end vehicles within the site up -an which such signs
are Iccated.
3. Integral Signs: Names . i ! .,,ic;•ngs date of construction, coo nmemorauve
tablt t and the like, which are of a pe•rmanetit construction and w iic, we an
inte- i' part of the building or the r.tructure
4. Canir an Signs: Signs or posters announcing candidate-, se tk►ng polit"I
office, t, ,ssijes to Le voted upon at a puolic ele..tron Such sigrmust retain
the name and address of person(s) responsible for such sign and 'hat per: 7n(s)
shall be iesponsible for its removal 7hese sigris shall remain for no tonver t'lan
sixty five (651 days before and five 15) days after the election fcr which th" are
intended. The City shall have the right !c) remove vW destroy signs after the
five (5) day limit.
5 Holiday Signs Signs or displays which contain or depict messages
oertaining to a national, state or local holiday and no other matter and h►ch
are displayed for a period not to exceed sixttr 160► days.
6. Construction Signs: A noniilurrnnated sign announcing the names of
architects, engineers, contractors cr other individuals or firms involved wtth the
construction, alteration or repair of a building (but not including any
advertisement of any product) or announcing the character of the building
eenietrpii" or the purpose for which the building is intwxled. S,jch signs she"
be confined to the s►te of the construction, alteratior. or leper, and shall be
removed within two (2) years of the date of issuance of the first building permit
or when the particular projrct is completed, whichever is scorner One s9n shall
be permitted fc,, each malc>r street the protest abuts. No sigr± may exceed thirty
two (321 squares feet.
7. Individual Property Sale, lease or Rental Sign Arty rin premrse sign
announcing the name of thp owner, manager, reeltor or other roffsorf directty
involved in the sale or rental of the property or announcvV the purpose for
which it is being ohered Sig* s must be removed within ton 110) days after bale
Or rental of property Signs -nay not mossure rn-jte than twftve 02, square
fret There shall be only or-c v.rgn per property, exi, t r-arrter prcpert�e�s which
truly have orif sign on each ftont,"-
i m.
10 ,'" ) 4 10 29 4
A) 8. Rummage Sale Signs: Signs advurtising a rurrimayc sale not exceeding four
(4) square feet located on private property which conform if) the applicable
provisions of this Title and are removed at the termination of the sale.
9. One name plate sign for each dwelling and not exceeding two (2) square feet
in area per surface No signs shall be so constructed w, to have more than two
l2) surfaces
10. One nenie plate for each dwelling group of six (6) or more unit sign
shall not exceed six 16) square feet in area per surface. No sly, be
constructed to have 1 ire than two (2) surfaces.
11. Real Estate r t, �pment Project Signs: For the purpose of selling or
promoting a dev. ..went project of three (3) to twenty five (25' acres, one sign
not to exceed un; hundred 000) square feet of advertising surface mr.y be
erected on the project site For projects of twenty six (26, through fifty 150)
acres, one or two (2) signs not to exceed two hundred (2001 aggregate square
feet of advertising surface may be erected. For projects over fifty one 151)
acres, one, two (2) or three. (3) signs not to exceed three hundred (300)
aggregate square feet of advertising surface may be erect&(' No dimension
shall exceed twenty five feet (25') exclusive of supporting siru. ,fires. Such sign
shall not remain after ninety five percent (95%) of the project is developed. The
permit for such signs niust be renewed annually by the City Council, shall be
bordered with a decorative material compatible with the surrounding area. If
such signs are lighted, they shall be illuminated only during those r irs when
business is in operation or when the model hontes or other Bevel ment are
open for conducting business. Real estate „evelopment signs are any )red in ail
zoning districts by permi'.
IB) Prohibited Signs: The following signs are prohibited in all zoning districts:
1. Any sign which obstructs the vision of drivers or pedestrians or detracts
from the visibility of any official traffic control device.
2. Any sign which contains or imitates an official traffic sign or signal. except
for private, on orrd ,.se directional signs
3. Off-p,emise ,.avertising signs except as regulated herein.
4. Business signs on or attached to equipment, such as semi -truck trailers,
being used in such a manner, on either a temporary or permanent basis, that
signing is a principal use of the equipment, except as a temporary sign allowed
by permit tot a period riot to exceed seven (7) consecutive days roe fourteen
(14) days in a cak►ndar year.
5 L ny sign which moves or rotates including electronic reader board signs,
except time and temperature information signs and barber poles
im
10 29 - 4
10- 2`I 6
H) 6. No sign shall display any moving parts, be iliurr.utated with anv f� shin') ur
intermittent lights, or shall it be animated, except time and temperature
information. All displays shall be shielded to prevent any light to be directed at
oncoming traffic in such brilliance as to impair the vision of any driver. No
device shall be illuminated in such a manner as to interfere with or obscure an
official traffic sign or signal. This includes indoor sitns which are visible from
public streets.
7. Projecting signs.
8. Roof signs.
9. Any sign which contains or consists of banners, pennants, ribbons,
streamers, string of light bulbs, spinners or similar devices, except where used
for noncommercial speech.
10, Portable signs.
11. Signs painted directly on building wall,
12, Signs which ad,ertise an activity, business, product or service that has not
been produced or -)nducted on the promises for more than thirty (30) days.
13. Illuminated signs or spotlights giving off ar, intermittent or rotating bearn
existing as a collection or concentration of rays of light.
14. Revolving beacons, beamed lights or similar devices
15. Bench signs.
10-29— 5: SIGNS ALLOWED BY PERMIT IN R 1, R-1A, R 2, R-3A, R 3B, R-3C
DISTRICTS:
(A) Name Plate Signs: Any narne plate 14-s c;ver two (2) square feet shall be set
back at least ten fr• -t (10 ) from any property line. No "n shall ex;,eed ten feet
00') in height above the Average grade level. Signs may be illuminated, but
such lighting shall be diffused or indirect and not illuminate beyond any lot line.
Any sign over ten 00) square faet may project only two feet (2') over any
requir^d yard area
(6) Free standing signs shall oe permitted for the purpose of permanent
identification of residential areas. At each principal enhance tc such an area, a
maximum of two (2) signs, not to exceed twenty (20) square fret per sign (of
actual sign area exclusive of wells or supports), shall be allowed. Larger signs
may be allowed as pert of a planned unit development
10-- 29-6- SIGNS ALLOWED BY PERMIT IN 8-1, 8.2, 8 3, 1-1, 1-2 DISTRICTS:
Therp are two (2) sign options The property owner shall seie;t one
uption which will control sign sire on each lot.
1232
10 2:+ 6
(A) Option A Wall Signs:
1. Under Option A only wall signs shall be allowed. The maximum number of
signs on any principal building shall be two (2), and in all cases, each sign shall
be placed on a separate wall (frontage). The maximum sire of wall signs under
Option A shall be as specified in the following schedule indicating the
maximurn allowable sign area based on tf 3 percentage of the gross silhouetted
area of the front of the building.
2. When a budding faces two (2) or more streets, the totem, -,*'owed sign area
shall be based upon the gross silhouetted area of the two (2) smaller building
sides facing streets. No building side may have signage in excess of the signage
allowed for the side of the building based upon the gross silhouette area of that
►x►ilding side.
3. For multiple occupancy buildings, each tenant may have one business t lyn,
but the total area shall not exceed that allowed under Option A. In the event
there are two (2) or more tenants in a building, the building owner, shall
prescribe a sign criteria d►st,ibut►ng the proposed signs to the tenants.
4. Signs may be placed on t` 2 s..;et of a building not facing a street, but the
total sign area on the building shal! not exceed that allowed in Option A or as
provided in this Sectson.
OPTION A, WALL SIGN ONLY
a b c
6 1 24 sq. tt. or 12% up to 200 sq. ft.
B-2 50 sq. tt. or 16% up to 200 sq. tt.
B-3 100 sq. tt. or 18% up to 250 sq, ft.
1-1 125 sq. ft. or 20% up to 300 sq. ft.
1 2 125 sq. ft. or 20% up to 300 sq ft.
a Allowable square footage of sign area ►rrespectrve of silhouette a! ea.
b. Allowable sign area based on percentages of silhouette area of
building.
C. Sign areas exceeding maximum shown in column c, but less than
area allowed in column b hereof may be allowed by conditional use
Permit
(B) Option H Wall and Pylon Si41ns:
1. Under Option 6, wall signs and pylon signs or both may be used, however,
not more than one pylon sign may be used. The maximum allowable sign ores
for anv wall sign shall be ra specified in the following schedule, indicating the
alk►wable sign area for the total pylon sign and well sign based on the silhouette
,ire,, (! they building (column m) hereof,
i1
10 29 6
10 h
B) 2. When a building faces two 12) or more streets, the total allowed sign awa
shall be based upon the gross silhouetted area of the two (2) smaller building
sides facing streets. No building side may have signage in excess of the signage
allowed for the side of the building based upon the gross silhouette area of that
building side.
3. 'r+ th% case of multiple occupancy buildings, each tenant may have one
business sign, but the total area shall not exceed that allowed under Option B
hereof. When there are two 12.) tenants or more in a building, the building
owner shall prescribe a sign criteria distributing the proposed signs to the
tenants. In the ease of a multiple occupancy building, which is a center for t
industrial, commercial or retail purposes on properties over ten (10) acres, a
pylon sign larger than that provided for in this Title may be approved as a
conditional use permit.
4. Sign:; may be- placed on the side of the building not facing the street up to
one sign per tenant, but the total sign area shall not exceed that allowed in
Option B hereof.
OPTION 8, WALL AND PYLON
L
B-1 24 sq. ft. or A% up to 150 sq. ft.
B-2 50 sq h. or 12% up to 150 sq. ft.
B-3 100 s!_ ft. or 14% up to 200 .q. h.
1-1 125 sc ft, or 16% up to 250 sq. ft.
12 125 sq. f- or 16% up to 250 sq. ft.
Pylon s*-g(is shall be allowed as !w this Section. The total sign are., of pylons
plus area of wall sign shall no', exceed the allowances above, however, in no
case shr• ' the total sivri ;,q,• be less than the amount of pylon signage allowed
based w, he street c' i%s,f .-ation.
a. Allowable square footage of sign area irrespective of silhouette area.
b. Allowable wall sign area based on percentage of silhoue.;te area of
building
c. Sign areas exceeding maximum shown in column c hereof, but less
than area allowed in column b may be allowed by conditional use
permit.
1C) Changeble Copy Signs In all B Districts and approved retail businevws in I
Districts, an optional, changeable copy sign may be allowed by conditional use
where, in the opinion of the City Council, the service provided is sufficiently
diverse or tenant exposure is such that reasonable on vie promotional efforts
result in a cluttered appearance created by temporary signage. Such signs may
be in addition to the wall and pylon option, but may not exceed fifteen feet
(15') in height above grade Where existing designs permit, these signs will be
attached to the pylon sign beneath the business name, otherwise. setback
governing the District wilt prevail Any approval of it conditional use permit
be granted only upon the elimination of window signs and all to mpor,
nonconforming signage.
1282
10 - 29 7
10 - 29 8
10 29 7: r I SIGNS: 1 he erecuon of one pylon sign for .any single lot in a
F;- -2, B-3, 11, 12 District is permitted under the following
c ns:
(A) Loction, r o pylon sign shall be located in ii required yard area except under
the following conditions.
1 Free standing signs under six feet (6') in height may be located ten feet (10')
from a street right of way.
2. Pylon signs may be located twenty feet (20') from a street right of way when
the design of the site is such that no parking occurs within the required front
yard area. In the case of a corner lot, all sides fronting on a public right of way
shall be deemed the front
(B) Parking Areas, Driveways' No part of the pylon sign shall be closer than five
feet (5') from any driveway or parking space_.
((:I Area, Height Regulations: The gross Brea and total height of a pylon sign shall
tw controlled by the following formula acid regulations for the purpose of
promoting uniformity based on sign location and surrr•unding conditions.
1. In 8.1, 8 2, 8 3 and I Districts the gross sign area shall not exceed the
following square foot limits:
Speed
Area
Height
Clabsification
(Mph)
isq. h_;
Ifect
Collector
30
25
16
Yj
50
20
41
100
24
i horoughtares, Minor and
30
50
18
Intermediate Arterial
35
100
22.
40
125
24
45
150
26
50
175
28
Principal Arterials 55 200 32
and above
2. Definitions- Road classifications are defined by the official Comprehensive
Plan as adopted and amended.
10— 29 - 8: BILLBOARD'S AND OTHER OFF PREMISES ADVERTISING SIGNS:
(A) Billboards and other off premises advert*ny signs shatt to permitted only in I
Districts and only where the adjacent street speed lima rs fifty 450) motes per
hour or h+ghet
4
1m
Ili) A conditional use permit is required with a four hi►ndred fifty dollar (5450.11))
permit fee. A public, hearing before the Planning Commission and City Council
shall to conducted prior to the issuance of a conditional use permit.
(C) Upon obtaining a conditional use permit for a billboard or other off premises
advertising sign, the company or person obtaining the permit shall file with the
City a performance bond in the mininwm amount of ten thousand dollars
1$10,000.00) or a letter of credit or cash bond in like amount to guarantee
compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit The ten thousand
dollars ($10.000.00) shall cover one through five (5) signs. An additional two
thousand dollars ($2,000.00) in performance bond, let' ^r of credit or cash bond
shall be required for each additional sign above five (5).
(D) The maximum sign size shall be seven hundred fifty (750) square feet.
Billboards may incorporate cut outs protruding beyond the framed perimeter of
the sign face providing the total sign area not exceed seven hundred fifty (750)
square feet.
iE) The maximum height to the uppermost portion of any advertising devices shall
be forty five feet (45') The building setback limitat•on for the zoning district in
which the sign is located shall apply to setbacks It it advertising signs.
(F) The minimum radius d.stance between advertising signs shall be two thousand
feet (2,000').
(G) No billboard or other off -premises advertising sign structure shall be
constructed within two thousand feet (2,000') of the City's corporate limits.
(N) No billboard or other off -premises advertising sign structure shall be
constructed within five hundred feet (500') of any park or residential structure.
(I) No billboard or other off -premises advertising sign shall be constructed with o
one hundred fifty feet fl%) of the point of tangency of the entrance or exit
ramp on any intermediate arterial or principal arterial highway or within one
hundred fifty feet (150') of the intersection of the nearest right of way lines of
any other clads of street. No billboard shall be constructed within one hundred
feet (100') from any intersection. The intersection art a freeway shall be
measured from the point where the off ramp meets the +IsdEaceni traffic lane.
The intersection on any other artery shall be measured 4( m the curbline.
UI Billboards and other Of premises advertising signs shall 1-w- n single support.
metal structure free of any supports or guy wires. The na t .I %hall be ether
painted or treated in such a manner as to prevent detenora•ioi'.
(K) Signs shall have a maximum of two (2) face+s.
(l.) All electrical wiring shall be undefground and concealed
(Mi Billboards and other off-prenuses advertising signs may not be Oluw nated
betwown the hou:t of twelve o'clock (12 00; Midnight and six o'clock 16-f10i
A.M
10 29 ti 1 rt 29 1()
(N) ? hr! Iot on which a sign is located shall h#2 unproved by landscaping as
approved by the City Council and must be maintained in an acceptable manner.
(0) Billboards and other advertising signs are an accessory use.- however, they
shall meet all of the front, side, rear, street frontage and residential setbacks
required for a principal usa structure. In no case, however, shall the area
requirement for the sign be considered to fulfill open space requirements of the
principal structure.
(P) Perrnanent nonconforming off -premises signs and billboards shall be allowed
to continue unless they are darr,,aged more than fifty percent (50%) of the
structure. Repairs to damaged signs, however shall be niade in conformance
with the performance standards of th•.> Title
(0) All nonconforming off -premises signs and billboards shall meet the
performance standards of this T itle within six 16) years of the adoption of this
Title.
10-29- 9: OFF -PREMISE DIREC11ONAL SIGN: For the purpose of providing off,
street direction to a residential project or a new venture lxcq than
twelve (12) months following occupancy permit, a public religir�us or nonprotii
institution, or any use which, in the determination of the C .ty Council, incurs
substantial hardship from lack of reasonable identification as a , esult of its location, a
conditional use permit shall be required. Such sign shall not er'ceed one hundred (100)
square feet per face and such sign shall conform to the yare -, :irenients of the zoning
district in which it is located. Such conditional use penis sh,11, be issued for one year
periods. In addition, a directional sign may be permitted for any use which, in the
determination of the City Council, incures substantial hardship from lack or reasonable
identification as a result of its loc.ation. Such signs shall conform to the size, location
and general construction of those used to identify major streets in the City and shall be
bordered with a de^orative material to provide a better aesthetic quality. If a sign is
lighted, it shall be illuminated only during those hours when business is in operation or
when the model homes or other developments are open for conducting business.
10--29-- 10 PERMIT, INSPECTION AND FEE REQUIRED: Except as otherwise
provided in this Chapter, no sign er structure shall be erected,
constructed, altered, rebuilt or relocated until a permit has been issue(' by the pity. The
Director of Community Development, upon the filing rr an application for a sign
permit, shall exwnine the plans and specifications and ' mises upon which it is
proposed to erect the '-1n. If it appears that the props, i is in compliance with
the requirer, ents of Title, the fiuilding Code of th- ind all other laws and
ordinances of the City, the Director of Cornwunity De. aup—ent shall then refer the
sign permit application to the. Development Review Committee. The Development
Review Committee shall review the application for a sign permit and approve or
disapprove the sign permit. The permit shall be approved if it complies with this Title
and all other applicable laws and regulatioiis Its derision shall be. final except that the
applicant may appeal the decision in accordance with Sectior, 10 --- 5-- 7 of this Title.
I d1tV
10 29 11 10 ;:f 14
10 -29-- 11: UNSAFE SIGN, NOTICE: If the City finds that any %ign or other
advertising structure regulated herein is unsafe or insecure, a menace
to the public, or in violation of the provisions of this Chapter, the Director of
Community Development shall give written notice to the holder of the permit. The
holder of the permit shall remove or alter the structure so as to comply with the
standards required by this Chapter and indicated by the Director of Community
Development within ten (10) days after issuance of such notice.
10-29-12: EXISTING SIGNS: Any sign legally existing on the effective date of this
Chapter which does not conform t the requirements set forth in this
Chapter shall become a ncnconforming use. Nonconforming signs shall comply with
the following requirements.
(A) Permanent nonconforming on premises signs shall be allowed to continue, but
shall not be rebuilt, relocated, replaced or altered without being brought into
compliance with all the requirements of this Chapter. A business which has a
greater number of signs than is permitted by this Chapter must remove, change
or after its sign arrangement so as to conform to the provisions relating to the
number of signs. The property owner shall deterrnine which sigrs are to be
removed to comply with this Chapter and such signs so selected shall be
removed within one year of notice.
l 11) Permanent nonconforming off -premixes signs shall be a±vowed to continue, but
shall not be rebuilt, relocated, replacef or structurally altered without being
brought into compliance with all the requirements r;f this Chapter Off -
premises signs located in zoning districts where not permitted shall be removed
within three (3) years of notice. Maintenance of nonconforming off -premises
signs shall comply with provisions of Section 10-7---2 of this Code.
(C) Temporary and illuminated signs not conforming to the requirements of this
Chapter shall be removed or made to (�.)nform within sixty (601 days of notice.
10--- 29-13: MAINTENANCE: All signs and components thereof shall be kep' in
good repair and in safe, neat, clean and attractive condition
10— 29-14: REMOVAL OF SIGNS: The D►rectot of (;ommunny Devsk)pment shoo
order the removal of any sign erected or maintained in valation of thu
Title. Thirty (30) days' notice in writing shall be given to the owner of such sign, or of
the building, structure or premises on which such sign is located, to either Comply with
this Title or remove the sign. 10rd 241, 11-1582,
4:' 8 6 . 1 ol
APR 2 8193)G
TO: Mayor and City Council 1 l.+l t��' i,K,pf
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato#
DATE: April 23, 1986
SUBJRCT: Cable TV Commission's "Lake Minnetonka News"
Attached please find a copy of Orono's portion of the script that
went into the 14 community Lake Minnetonka News. At this present
time this monthly community news bulletin will be a means to get
information oit to the various communities. Should you have any
items or ideas of what we should put on here, please let me know.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by _ , to accept the
report on Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission's Lake Minnetonka
News". Ayes --I Nays
I'mut- .I u i 9
;EV Cam2 WS Bev/CG 05) THE CITY OF ORONO WILL BE CONDUCTING ITS ANNUAL SPRING CLEAN UP
Ready Caml SS Dean)
ON BOTH SATURDAY MAY THIRD AND SATURDAY MAY TENTH, F,, J AM TO
4:30 °M. TRASH MAY BE BROGGHT TO THE PUBLIC WORKS PARKING LOT AT
THE CORNER OF BROWN ROAD SOUTH AND SPATES AVENUE IN CRYSTAL BAY.
LEAVES AND SMALL ITEMS SHOULD BE BAGGED AND TIED, NEWSPAPER AND ALL
PAPER PRODUCTS MUST BE TIED SECURELY. THE CITY DOES NOT ACCEPT
BARRELS, TIRES, GARBAGE, TREES, BRUSH, CHEMICALS OR TRUCK LOADS
OF CLEAN UP MATERIALS.
THE CITY OF ORONO IS PARTICIPATING WITH THE HENNEPIN COUNTY
DEPA. TMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY IN PROVIDING COMPOST MATERIAL.
THE COMPOST IS AVAILABLE AT THE PUBLIC WORKS PARKING LOT BETWEEN
8:00 AM AND 4:30 PM, MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY. SUPPLIES MIAY BE LIMITED.
JEAN Caml SS Dean ORONO HAS AN INSPECTION PLAN FOR ON SITE SEPTIC SYSTEMS IN THE
Ready CamZ WS Bev
AREAS OF THE COMMUNITY THAT HAVE NO SEWERS. ON A RECURRING BASIS,
THE CITY INTENDS TO INSPECT ALL SEPTIC SYSTEMS IN THE COMMUNITY AND
WILL MONITOR THOSE THAT ARE ON THE VERGE OF FAILING. SHOULD YOU
IiAVE ANY QUESTIONS IN REGARD TO THIS PROGRAM, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO
CALL 1-1IKE GAFFRON AT 473-7357.
THE CITY OF ORONO PROVIDES POLICE SERVICE BY CONTRACT TO THE
CITIES OF LONG LAKE, SPRING PARK, AND MINNETONKA BEACH, THE ORONO
POLICE RESERVE ALSO SERVES THE FOUR COMMUNITIES. APat.ICATIONS ARE
BEI14G ACCEPTED NOW FROM PEOPLE LIVING IN THESE FOUR CITIES WHO
ARE INTERESTED IN JOI;'i;NG THE RESERVE. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
PLEASE CALL CHIEF MEL KILBO AT 413-771-J.
(READY BEY)
(Ready CamZ WS Bev)
BEV WS Bev ORONO WILL BE IN NEED OF ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE PRIMARY
Ready Cam1 SS Bev/CG 06)
ELECTION IN SEPTEMBER AND THE GENERAL ELECTION IN NOVEMBER. ANY
INDIVIDUAL WHO IS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE CAN BE APPOINTED AS AN ELECTION
JUDGE. ELECTION JUDGES ARE PAID AN HOURLY RATE ON ELECTION DAY.
INTERESTED PARTIES SHOULD CONTACT DOROTHY HALLIN, CITY CLERK
AT 473-735b.
BEV Caml SS/CG #6 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS BRISK IN SHOREWOOD. IT IS ANTICIPATED
toady Caml WS Dean
TO BE THE BUSIEST YEAR FOR BUILDING ACTIVITY EVER EXPERIENCED IN
THE CITY. SHOREWOOD'S CITY PLANNER, BRAD NIELSEN, CONSERVATIVELY
FORECASTS THAT 50 TO 75 NEW HOME-BUILDING PERMITS WILL BE ISSUED
IN 1986. EIGHTEEN NEW HOME BUILDING PLANS HAVE ALREADY BEEN
RECEIVED THE FIRST THREE MONTHS OF THE YEAR. THIS COMPARES TO
THIRTY FIVE NEW HOME PERMITS ISSUED DURING ALL OF 1985.
DEAN CamZ WS Dean _ SHOREWOOD'S ANNUAL SPRING CLEAN UP WILL TAKE PLACE THIS YEAR
Ready Cam1 WS Bev
UN SATURDAY AND SUNDAY, MAY THIRD AND FOURTH BETWEEN THE HOURS Or
8:00 AM AND 5:00 PM. RESIDENTS MAY BRING TREE BRANCHFS, CUTTINGS,
CLIPPINGS, DISEASED WOOD, APPLIANCES AND MISCELLANEOUS REFUSE FOR
DISPOSAL TO THE CITY MAINTENANCE GAR LOCATED NEXT TO CITY HALL
AND BADGER PARK ON COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. GLASS AND CONCRETE WILL NOT
BE ACCEPTED. THE DUMPING CHARGE WILL DEPEND ON THE SIZE OF THE LOAD.
SENIOR CITIZENS WILL BE ALLOWED TO DUMP AT ONE-HALF OF THE ESTABLISHED
RATES. REMEi#3ER, ALL PERSONS WISHING TO BRING REFUSE TO THE SPRING
CLEAN UP MUST BRING IDENTIFICATION TO PROVE THAT THEY ARE RESIDENTS
OF SHOREWOOD.
SHOREWOOD'S PUBLIC WOkKS DIRECTOR, DON ZDRAZIL, IS ASKING
RESIDENTS TO PLEASE WATCH OUT FOR CITY MAINTENANCE CREWS AND IN IP14ENT
[AIRING THE COMING MONTHS OF ROAD REPAIR AND PARK MAINTENANCE.
(READY ,LV)
(Ready Caml WS Bev/CG /7)
418i36. 5 i'
TO: Msyor at. .:ounc i 1 (� 1f� C
PROM: Ma . rk Ber-ithar,son, City AdminiStratorfl('A� ��� i Or ORONO
DATE: April 18, 195(,
SUBJECT: VanEeckhout 13,.Iilc:iny Corporation - Request f�-.)r Sewer
Attached please find the request of Mr. Charles VanEE,.'khout and 3
copy of the memorandum Mike Gaffron presented relating to the
property Mr. VanEeckhout owns, just north of the Long Lake Bank,
off. Brown Road North.
As you will note in the attached correspondence b.tween the City
and Mr. VanEeckhout, back in February it was indicated to him
that the City would not entertain the possibility of having the
property hooked to sewer in Long Lake even though the lines are
adjacent to the property, unless it could be proved that septic
was not a viable option.
To date Mr. VanEr�ckhout :,as had an analysis done on the property
and the possible locations for a primary and alternate system on
the site ar,! very restrictive and border on being technically not
feasible. Mr. VanEeckhout however, does not want to at ""is
point, do the final analysis without s:)me indication frc.
Council. that if it does turn up Lo be negative, whether he w....uld
then be able to hook to sewer or not.
The issues are as follows:
1._SEPTIC - If development of 3 reliable septic system
on tTiE site is not feasible, it would be our
recommendat ion that the Mr. VanEeckhout be al lowed to
h('.)ok to the Long Lake sewer system.
2 DENSITY - Since this is an issue for strictly septic
or sewe 1C ng of the property Mr. VanEeckhout shoul.i not
therefore be allowe.,1 to inert -asp density on the site at
the present, or in the future, particularly given the
layout of the narrow site. Therefore it is our
recommendation that if allowed to hook to sewer it must
be un1errstood t`,at it be with the stipulation that there
be no subdivision of the pro ty based on the sewering
of the property.
1. SFWE_R CAPACITY - The ac.t• hookup to sewer would
throug�i'an� ex i st i ng manhole and into the Long I
system. It them becomes an issue of whether this wou iJ
be an Ororn unit used by this Orono development or Long
Lake's unit.. This would be units not in the laterals in
bong Lake, but the distribution of capacity in the the
existing Medina,'Long Lake/Orono liner. Mr. VarEeckhout
h n inlicate,i that he di:1 have �;ome "`;,-ing Lake units"
left over fru his townhjuse development in Long Lake,
as that development wa:a not as den,_ly developed as
origina�ly requested. The City of Long La'., may he
willing to utilize one of those units for thi iroject,
however this is something that would ha•, �, to be
negotiated between Long Lake and Orono. A related issue
is that the overall capacity, be it Long Lake or Orono
units would reduce the number of unit: available to the
rest of the Highway 12 corridor study area. This does
become an iseuc if no new lines are run from the block
between Old Crystal Bay Road, Highway 12 and Willow
Drive as therefore there would be a 'Limited number of
units available. Regardless of that, we feel it
apl. opriate that if septic is nc,. a viable option that
Mr. VanEeckho.it be allowed tr) hook to sewer even if it
happens to be an Jron(�) unit.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by that Mr.
VanEeckhout be given the indication by the Council that he will
be allowed to hook up to sewer if septic is not a viable
alternative to the satisifaction of the City of Orono, but that
any hookup to sewer would not have any accompanying rezonin or
ability to subdivide to higher densities, as outlined in a
proposel resolution to be brought to Council if final analysis
indicrtecl that septic is not a viabl,, solution. Ayes _ , Nays
cc: Mr. Charles Vani:eckhout
NOTE
The additional nformation which should be submitted by
VanP,eckhout to fni document soil/site conditions on the sub3ect
property shoulc; ins. de:
1. Logs of ,oil borings in tha si+e�s whim hav•? a
potential for drainfield usr.
2. Lock of percolation tests in those same sites.
3. The site evaluator's analysis of these perc tests
and hor ings relate_, to the topography and oth(.�r
unique site conditions giving a detailed opinion as
to the feasibility and practicality of developing a
septic system or. the potential sites.
TO: Orono City Council
FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, assistant ''Zoning Adminiscrator
DATE: April. 11, 1986
SUBJ: Request by VanEeckhout Building Corporation for Sewer. Connection -
Property north of Long Lake Bank, east of North Brown Road
NOTE: This letter of ::ec7> st arrived while Mark Bernhardson was on vacation
and he has not had a ce to review it, hence I am including it as an
information item only
The property in question is a parcel of about 140' x 1150' or 3.9 acres, of
which approximately 2.8 acres is dry buildable. The property is adjacent
to the City of Long Lake, and is adjacent to the VanEeckhout townhouses,
with a sewer manhole available about. 25' from the south property line (see
topographical su-2y). Based on the location of the sewer so close to the
property, and bas.- on the potential problems with slow -perking clay soils
and some steep si,,t-, VanEeckhout felt there would be a good case for
connecting this prop,�cy to the sewer. In my tweeting with VanEeckhout and
his site evaluator on the site on March 21, I concurred that indeed there
appeared to be potential problems in locating a primary and alternate
septic system on the property, and if they could document the infeasibili*y
of using an on -site system, the sewer connection right be looked upon mc--e
favorably by the Council.
Documentation submitted to date includes
A. Letter of request dated 4/7/86 - VanEeckhout makes 5 points:
1) Septic systems arc, more prcrie to failure than sanitary sewers
(this is a "given").
2) Impermeable soils on the site (alluded to by site evaluator,
but sites have not been perc-tested).
3) Steep slopes (perhaps the best argument for allowing sewer
connection to this property).
4) Practicalitl (due to existing old foundation locations, the
second or altert::�te site for a system would be 650' from the
proposed home site).
5) Potential for a future subdivision (It -his seems remote with
only 2.8 dry acres in a 2 arse zone).
B. L.c,tter from Steve Shirmers, MPCA certified Site Evaluator. This
letter documents the shallow depth to zones of seasonal saturation
inferred by soil mottling, which would require use of a mound system.
Mound systems cannot in Any event be used where slopes exceed 12*, and
only can be used on slopes of 6-12% when the perc rates are 1/2 - 30
minutes per inch, according to Orono's existing codes. Although perc
testinq has not been clone, the soils found by Shirmers would likely
have glower perc rates t.har are desirable for a mound on steeper
sIopeSa.
VanEeckhout Building Corp. Request
April 11, 1986
Page 2 of 2
C. Topographic Survey - this has been provided by VanEeckhout, and I
have analyzed the slope percentages and categorized them as 0-6`t; 6-
12%; greater than 12%. The only adequately large site for a mound
where slopes are 0-6% is an area at the midpoint of the lot that is
very wet at the northerly end and appears to have been filled at the
southerly end, hence would not seem very feasible for an on -site
system.
Aside from the philosophical questions and the restrictions on sewer
connection imposed by the Comprehensive Plan, etc. in my opinion, in order
to justify granting of a sewer connection, the Council should require
adequate documentation to prove from a technical standpoint that an on -site
system is not feasible on the property.
This documentation should include logs of soil bori-ags and perc testing,
and this information has not been submitted, although I stated to both
VanEeckhout and Shirmerst)-t this information will be necessary to prove
%-hetF.�r or not a system is .easible on the property.
When Mark Bernhardson returns, we will meet with VanEeckhout to follow up
on this matter. However, I expect VanEeckhout and the people whom he will
be building for will be at the meeting Monday night and will request that
you discuss this at that time.
PP
VAN EEC_KHOU_T BUILDING CORPORATION
1435 WEST WAY=ATA BLVD ,+SUITE 0165 • UDNG LAKE, MINNESOTA 55356 • (61 2) 473-1578
April 1, 1986
Mr. Mark Bernhardson
City of Orono
P. 0. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MPS. 55323
Dear Mr. Bernhardson
On February 6, 1986, I requested your help and approval to hook up to a
sanitary sewer located within the municipal boundries of Long Lake. You
indicated that I should make further investigations as to the ability of the
property to be served with an on -site disposal system and to get back to you
if an on -site system is net practical.
I have had a survey and contour map prepared and have had Steve Schirmers,
a soils and on -site disposal system special?st make a study of the site.
Mike Gaffron of the City of Orono also visited the site and was present
during part of the evaluation process and had an opportunity to review the
soil conditions. It seems highly desireable from many points of view, t.o
hook up to the existing sanitary sewer, several being:
1. On -site systems always involve the possibility of failure, and
in this case, c.::;old result in lake pollution.
2. The soils on this site are highly impermeable and not desirable
for an on -site system.
3. The slope of the ground is beyond desirable limits and further
aggravates a very difficult site.
4. There are no good practical locations for an on -site system.
5. I have sold this lot with a single family home proposed to be
constructed as soon as possible on the Easterly half of the lot.
There is always the posibility of a future request to use the
Westerly half of the lot for other purposes.
I understand that this matter wi11 have to be considered by the City Council
and would request that it be placed on the agenda for the next meeting April
14th.
Sincerely,
C. E. Van Eeckhout
President
CEY!,I•I
S-P TESTING,
951 KATYDID LANE
ST. MICHAEL, MN 55376
497-3566
STEVE SHIRMERS
VanEckhout Building Corp.
Property owned by VanEckhout
Property is located on the
border of the city of Long Lake &
East of Brown Rd & West of the
lake -Long Lake.
Oronon, MN. Henn. Co.
INC.L L; -j�
' G, , c,_. 0 1
April 10, 1986
A site evaluation was coTr,pleted oon the above property. This site has a
strong clay loam soil with a mottled l,-,yer at 18" to 24". This site
will need a pressurized mound system.
There are 2 sites possible, north of the barn, which has a 6% slope. The
system would be located up slope of the old foundation wall and 20' of
the system would be over the old field road. The second site ;s approx.
650' west of Brown road with a 10% slope. Both sites will need to be
tested, if used and are questionable due to the strong clay soil. The
site by Brown road is qu:,stionable due to the distance for pumping.
SBS/ds
Steven B. Schirmers
Soil and 1'errolation Tests
Septic .tivstem UOSign
l
de
1 �
j 7.3 r'
E/�a of b.htraat / !
y=—)
or
of
LO
LP
Al "Aw flow = 96,
IL
A., ARTMS
4b
.. I :. ice.;
- " , -,% '� A ?-. ...
-
Ilk
a so wf Good so"f bw
6-r,
to
To 0,6016,1,
its* L R I
. %a 0494
C
rl
4;
e
?tw i N� a N «•�• IlkAm a t� lAso
}
c a 1 •• NR �1 t1i � �� L'Ry t �tri • yt�
£�y tM wort 4_
t.cf►a +bet awtvi1 ♦` N• +•xa�f>•sa►+IF
w�twrwwiN wt f�• aM/fM�1 if*• fr�trtl �. • •f
21886.9
TO: Mayor and City Council 7�
FROM: 'lark Bernhardson, City Administratorr`'(
DA'"E: February 18, 1986
SUBJECT: Sewer Connections - Charles VanEeckhout
Attached please
find
letters
from Mr. VanEeckhout requesting
sewer connection
through
Long
Lake for property he has that
ahutts both the
City
of
Long
Lake and the actual lake. The
letter we felt is in
tune with
th-! direction that Council has
given staff in
the
most
recent
rejection of Jeff Stebbins'
request for hookup to
the
Long Lake sewer.
In a subsequent conversation with Mr. VanEeckhout he indicated
that he felt the City's policy should be revised and that it
should allow for properties in Orono to hook to sewer when sewer
represented the best means to service the sanitary needs for a
property. It was outlined to him in that conversation that if he
felt a policy change should be made, he should address a letter
t� the Mayor outlining his concerns. Additionally it was
indicated to him that there would be a possible issue in over all
sewer capacity as it relates to that area and that he should
become aware and involved in the Highway 12 corridor study.
Should you have any questions or comments, Flease feel free to
contact me.
PROPOSED MOTION - ?loved by , seconded by _ City Council
accept the information regarding the request for sewer from Mr.
"harles VanEeckhout. Ayes , Nays
CITYof ORON O
Post Office [lox 66eCryatal day, Mrnneww 553Z1•113urucipa1 Offiem
On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka
February 10, 1986
C.E. i' in Eeckhout
Van Eeckhout Building Corporation
1935 West Wayzata 31vd., Suite #165
Long Lake, MN 55356
Re: P.I.D. 34-118-23 12 0004
Dear Mr. Van Eeckhout:
The following is in response to your letter of 2/6/86 requesting
a residential sewer connection to an adjacent Long Lake line for a
proposed residence at the property refer -need above.
The City of Orono has limited sewer capacity. Future units have
been reserved for properties already assessed within an existing
service area. We are currently involved in a Comprehensive Planning
Study of the Highway 12 Corridor within the City of Orono. That study
will determine how these units will be assigned based on existing and
proposed new uses. Your property is not included in that study zone
and continues to be classfied as a rural property to be develope,3 per
Orono rural standards including on -site septic systrrs.
The current files have no information on septic testing completed
for the subject property. If tests reveal that your property is
unable to sustain an on -site septic system, the City may consider your
request for municipal sewer.
Your letter advises that you received approval for 16 sewer
connections from Long Lake for your townhouse project on the adjacent
property also noting that there is adequate capacity in the line.
3ased on formal agreements executed in 1981 between the Cities of
Orono and Long Lake, any connection for an Orono property +ould by
credited against the City of Orono. The City of Orono is not in a
position to consider any special requests for sewer connections until
the planning study is completed in May or June.
Should you h,.ve further questions or comments, please feel free
to contact me.
t
E. `fie
7deon,
(•ity Administrator
81 It,l)l%(.0 /(NI%1. 411 ? 1S' 0 ADM I%ISTR %TIUn & I IN AN( 1 17i 7.1SM M'RI N.' wooms 47) 73119
.11
he
VAN EECKHOUT BUILDING CORPORATION'
1935 WEST WAYZATA 9LVD , SUITE 1165 • LONO L.AxE. MmNESOTA 55356 • (612)
February 6, 1986
Mr. Mark Bernhardsor,
City of Orono
P. 0. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN. 55323
Dear Mr. Bernhardson:
*I57fB
- 1 -
I presently own a three -plus acre residential building site in Orono
adjacent to Long Lake.
As part of an adjacent townhouse project, I installed a lateral sewer
.ine that terminates a few feet from the Orono boundry. This line has
surplus capacity since I received approval to build sixteen townhouses
and have scaled the project back to twelve units.
1 am proposing to build one single family home on the Orono site and
would like to hook up to the exising sanitary sewer. It seems lake a
logical solution to the sewage problem in this case, since this is a
lake lot and central sewer is preferred, from a pollution point of view
and there is adequate capacity available.
Should this request require City Council consideration, I would like
to be notified of the meeting date.
Sincerely,
C. E. Van Eeckhout
President
CEVlja
Enc l .
i A w �y _-_ ✓ V ✓ v V v J V
23
PAL -
pop
04
So
:.•... ..y .� '�..''' "' Rob/. C *WAX N.
•'♦.. -5uN-;OZZ-0J A lei • S,I+
let -
Ow Ron
�jk
A...i1
� , �, ''r 4t a :!Lto'+7 ( r''t r�✓� ��
-IPA' Done
��j FA
Of
LAAA
' � • � II . `• � ,, ` Carl ,��' � ♦ • • yt��' `•/
. �„•o• +` v
p�.. • J .♦. • • {
.. ten• Y •• j • •� V��CO ♦ •
41886.8
f.p r...� E i I N G
TO: Mayor and City Council F'�i' 2 (d�6
G
FROM: Mark Brrnhardson, City AdministratorK) MY 6 ONUNO
DATE: April 18, 1986
SIR3JECT: Briu.. Fulmer - "Dog house", 3507 Wayzata Boulevard
INTRODUCTION - As you may recall Mr. Fulmer has been in
attendance at our Highway 12 corridor study meetings with two
issues that relate to the development of this property that was
approved back in July 1984. Tt' issues are as follows:
Septic/Sewer - Following approval of the conditional use
permit 1Ly-4as determined that the site is not able to
have a sepcic system on it that would accomodatp the
commercial development that has been approved.
Therefore he is exploring the possibility of being able
to sewer the property through the new Maple Plain -Long
Lake interceptor line. It has been determined that it
i _echnically feasible and in order for Mr. Fulmer to
.ay m the property he feels he wi 11 need to sewer the
p Nperty.
i:oninn /Conditiona_i Use - An issue Mr. Fulmer has alluded
icy is the fact that the zoning, in that its a
residential property with a conditional use permit to
allow the Dog House Kennels, has been i,rob: emat is in
getting fin ling. It's my understanding that this i-
no longer a ,Oif icant issue.
Acid i t Iona 1 ly as you may be aware there was a significant
fire in the house/residence of Mr. Fulmer 3 w^eks ago
and there has been significant damage to Ile is
presently living in the mobile facil'' at was
approved by the Council at their April 14, eetino.
Mr. Fulmer is at a decision point in which he needs to determine
what he will 3o with this facility.
1. SEWER HOOKUP - If the City :1.low:i Mr. Fulmer to
hookup`}o t'�Fie sewer and MWCC concu s he wi 1 l then go
at- ai-i get a contractor to repair his house_ this year
a 9 go ahoad with plans this year and next year to
cc,nstruct the :_-ommcrcial bui l:aing that was previously
approved. (The City mc,y need review those
a-, •,val4) .
2. O SEWER HOOKUP - If the City decline approve
the hookup o� thyis facility to the sewer r. Fulmer
feels he will iteed to move to a different site in or,ler
to dl v e l Op his bu.:, i ness.
1 .0r
Three issue -r; in relationship to this request are as
follows:
1. Maple Plain/3Lon❑ — -�
Lake Interceptor Hookups - The
r——--------— — — — —
----__r_,-�._
Permit that was issued for construction limits line so
that no new residential units pan be hookup to the line
in Orono. This is iiot however, a new residential unit
an(+ is more of a commercial facility.
1. Alternate Uses - Once this property is sewered it
would— be difficult to prevent any other use on the
property from utilizing the sewer.
3. Variance to Moratoriv- Tn order to - low the hookup
and- reconst.r,iction ii . therefore requirF_ that a
variance he grantea moratorium ordinance which
would require Council . .L_roval.
RECOMMENDATION - It is staff's recommend atic-,n that the City of
Orono approve the hookup to the Maple Plain interceptor and that
they communicate a request to Metro waste Contr-' Commission in
order for that to be accomplished. It is felt that this is the
most appropriate use of the property given its seveic restraints
and that the issue of zoning should be dealt with during the
Highway 1.2 corridor study process in order to maximize control on
the actual use of the property apart from the ability to have
Sewer.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded `)y , City Council
direct the staff to request Metro waste Control —Commission allow
the Dog house property to be hookup to the Maple Plain/Lonj Lake
interceptor line. Ayes
cc: Brian Fulmer
I
theoog MR 22 1986
Ouse boarding kennels, inc.
3505 wayzata blvd. e kjnr 'ake, mn a 55356 g 612073.9026 o brian & cathy fulmer
Fkzzzc � mw%.�
r,.e
OVEL 'Pk_*'Ar-X' "A-!.
vc Cam,'
t_j
M-N",
VkA Wt.
"q L
member
AO=ILM
cmfz"
Ctr- 4CAC*) r-N- Q:'F-f' PTE:RY�-)-Tv*aTrA- k&,Z,
LjaC' Re-C f0r.'N)ALJ--A Per
46- wmA
"47 v 4f Iry ref C-W trf N4 4;-.
-3vv Inv TiMwQ,
42186.3
Clio,,;a :' = (ING
OF ItioNo
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratorf
DATE: April 21, 1986
SUBJECT: Facilities Assessment
In your last Council packet i transmitted a copy of the
facilities assessment with the recommendation that the current
City facilities should be replaced in the near term.
At this Council meeting ' would like to discuss the initial ideas
and/or concerns that the Councilmembers may have regarding this
recommendation so to decide which course of action is
appropriate, since there will need to be some expenditures made
to fixup the current buildings and these should be based on what
the Council desires to do with the present or new facilities.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to direct staff to
do further research on thimatter and bring it back to the
Council meeting on May 27, 1986. byes Nays
42186.4
TO: Mayor and City Council e(
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratorjigv
DATE: April 21, 1986
SUBJECT: Navarre Redevelopment
t.Pf� 2 31�au
CITY 3F r
In the last packet was enclosed the proposed time table for
the initial work to explore the Navarre redevelopment. This is
on the agenda to see if Counci lmembers have any further thoughts
or feedback on this item. It is anticipated that City staff will
be sitting down with interested members of the Navarro business
community some time in the May -June time frame. Staff is
coordinating this through the Westonka Chamber, as they had a
previous interest in this item.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to direct staff
with any thoughts Council may have regardiny Navarre
redevelopment. Ayes ! , Nays
42186.5
�C
TO: Mayor
and City Council
FROM: Mark
Bernhardson, City
c�
Administratorl,��
VV
DATE: April
21, 1986
SUBJECT: Administrator's Goal Setting
In the 11ast Council packet was included three item::
1985-86 Goal Jetting Status
1986-87 Goal Setting
Administrator's Evaluation 1986
HNG
�► GF 'Nos
As you may recall the 1st of May is the conclusion of my first
year with the City and it is appropriate that an evaluation of
the Administrator be donQ in advance of any salary reccmmendation
being presented by the Mayor to the Council. In addition it
would be appropriate to make any changes in the contract that
Council and/or the Administrator feel are appropriate.
At this time I kauld like to change the verbage regarding the car
allowance to also include related City Administrator expenses.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the Council
members will submit their evaluations to the Mayor for her
consideration and discussions with one other Councilmember to
negotiate any amendments for the City Administrator's contract
for the year 1 May, 1986 to 30 April, 1987. Ayes , N+ys
R
TO M-iyor and City Cour i 1
FROM: Hark Bernhardson, City Administrato 1`
DATE:: April 21, 1986
_��� i ;
ING
SUBJI:cT: Liquor Operations Report - January -March ' 86
As indicated at our last discussion on February 28, 1986
regarding 1985 year end results it was indicated that staff would
bring back this item with the first three months result so ghat
you would be able to compare those results against the targets
and the business strategy plan that had been established for
1986.
Below are
the first
three month
results historically and
as
weight against
the targets that have been established.
'83
'84
'85
1986
Actual
Actual
Actual
Target
Actual
Net Sales
76,01.
85,216
73,456
83,000
83,254
Cost of Sales
55,069
61,896
54,405
60,067
61,063
Gross Profit
20,943
2?,728
20,118
22,933
22,191
Expenses
27,382
28,167
29,418
28,290
28,071
Operating Income
(6,441)
(3,746)
(8,850)
(5,357)
(5,880)
( )-Indicates
Loss
Non Operating
Revenues
495
Net Income
(5,385)
Inventory 981950 100,088 97,41.1 80,000 92,419
The 1986 targets, if met, will yield about $10,000 net income by
the end of the year.
The most critical is the net income figure and to date the
operation is about $500 behind the target figure prior to
inclusion of nonoperating income.
RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the City continue to
monitor gin_ work on its business stratggy plan for improvement of
the business for the next three months and total figures for the
second quarter will be brought hack to the Council at its July
2Rth meeinq.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by to accept the
report and continue on course with the liquor operation Man for
1996. Ayes _ ► Nays
CITY JRONO
MUNICIPAL .QUOR STORE
BALANCE SHEET
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and Investments
Returned Checks n Credit
Card Charges
Accounts Receivable
Accrued Interest Receivable
Prepaid Expenses
Inventory for Resales
Total Current Assets
Property and Equipment:
Leasehold Improvements
Equipment
Less Accumulated Depreciation
Net Property and uipm<,,nt
Total Assets
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY
?,iabilities:
Accrued Wages Payable
Accrued Retirement Payable
Accrued Credit Card Expense
Accounts Payable
true to State (Sales Tax)
D) ie tr7 Fed Gov` (Liquor Tax)
'iota/ Liabilities
Fund Equity:
Retained Earnings January 1
Net Income January 1 to March 31
Transfers to General Furn1
Total furO Equity
Tr)t:11 Liabilities ani Fund Equity
MARCH 31, 1986
$ 19,730
536
540
9,454
92,419
723
25,763
2—E -r,9
23. ,61
$ 1,263
314
60
9,417
2,430
1,88
115,818
(5,385)
$122,679
3,127
$125,806
S 15,373
110,433
$125,806
MARCH 31, 1985
22,672
277
450
5,856
97,411
725
25,763
---Y6, 488
21,651
1, 241
169
79
7,053
2,1"
129,412
(8,850)
$126,666
4,837
$131,503
$ 10,941
129, 562
a axs-tssa
CITY OF ORONO
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE
STATEMENT OF REVENUE AND EXPENSF
Sales and Cost of Sales
Sales
Sales Discounts
Net Sales
Cost of Sales
Gross Profit After Sales Discount
Three
Months
Ended March 31
- 1986
1985
Amount
% Sales
Amount
Sees
$ 8h,630
100.00
$ 74,523
100.00
3,376
3.90
1,067
_1.43
�98.57
83,254
96.10
73,456
61,063
70.49
53,338
71.57
22,191
25.61
20, T8
27.00
Operating Expenses:
Personal Services
1.7,861
20.62
20,614
27.66
Supplies
322
.37
571
.77
Insurances
2,527
2.92
1,451
1.95
Building Rent
.1,750
4.33
3,750
5.03
Other Services & Ch,rges
3,183
3.67
2,604
3.50
Depreciation
428
.49
_ 428
.57
Total Operating Expens-
32.40
29,418
39.48
Operating Income (Los_�(5,880)
(6.79)
(9,300)
(12.48)
Nonoperating Revenue:
Interest on Inves,.ments
Other
Total Nonoperating Revenue
Net Income (Loss)
TYPE OF SALE
Licuor - SaleE
- Gross
Wine - Sales
- Gross P• f.
leer - Sales
- Gross Profit
Mix & 11isc. - Sales
Gross profit
Totals - Sales
- Gross Profit
- Sales Discour, .s
454
.52
A^7
41
.05
495
.57
A.
(5,38Si
_
(6.22)%
_
a (81850)
GROSS PROFIT
ON SALES
--- A ----
- B
----- A
36.68%
_
37.00%
38.47
30.96%
35.67
.60
60
�il:8a) a
B
27.40%
24.46
27.75
28.05
33.84
30.74
31.49
36.60
33.04
32.37
26.10
32.58
28.03
2.26
2.21
1.11
14.52
1.01
13.02
100.00%
100.00%
100.003
29.51
100.004
28.43
3.90
.1.43
Y57 6T1
27.09i
35 Tom. S3
�2ls'S
NOTE: Columns "A" reflect sales/gross profit as a precept of the total
sales /gross profit
,'Olumns "Ei" r:-fleet gross profit a percent of the type of sale
42186.7
1 /7
INS
TO:
Mayor and
City Council
FROM:
Mark Bernhardson,
City Administrator��
,� A
OF �+
DATE:
April 21,
1986
SUBJECT:
Assistant
thief - Replacement - Upgrade
With the retirement of. Assis nt C..iief Burmaster it is
appropriate-, that the City underL.xe the process for s•ereening
appointment of :i new individual to fill that vacan,:y. In
addition as you will recall. during budget period last year there
was discussion and money being placed in the budget to allow for
creation of a second Assistant Chief's position and elimination
of a Sergea 's position if it was deemed appropriate to do so
this year.
Given the f at potentially up to eight internal candidates
are interes the position ; .h varying backgrounds and
experience a. act that there are two positio, s, it is
deem(i appropr._�e his time that the City develop a process
for selection of individual. At this time staff has
explored with tw:, outside agencies the process by which we could
use such a selection. The approximate cost of the selection
process is $6,000 - $7,000 for both firms, which was unbudgeted,
however, is deemed to be an appropriate expenditure of money
P )d it is recommended that it be taken o,it of monies that would
otherwise be available in salaries and consultant fees.
At this time it is the intent to stay wi-nin the organization for
the selection and appointment of the ind i v iJua l (s) as it is felt
that there is a high caliber of people in.34de who would be able
to handle the job and only go outside if the selection process
so indicates.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , sec')nded by _ , that the City
Council d' ect the City Administrator tc; select Personnel
Management _.corporated to unukrt.ake the screening for position
of Assistant Chief anA that those monies allocated wi*_lin the
Police budget be used to fund payment of. ;.his selection process.
Ayes , Nays __.
!-
IN'I ' POYFICE MFMO 85.-50 y
1
DATE: April 25, 1986
TO: Mark Bernh::,rdsot,
FROM: Mel Kilbo, C' if!f of Police
'BJFCT: Light Aar
CA"iI.F it: ` Im%;" I I N G
n 3 1� 7r
Th .)artment is in the ptocess of equipping the, u k e d
car for pxulice reserve use (also being available for ..'her
dutv when reserves zr. not in service) .
'n.e risibility of tine poll h-s een a co rn especially around
boEA. la•unchir,,7 areas, fistiiir-- eus , as we_ as other functions
the reserves are called +o ptrform.
After discussion !-ith reserve psrsonr,el an' pol i ^e department st _ f ,
it was determined the unmarked czr should -.e fully marked. we
need to purchase a light ' it assembly. I have a quote from
Don Streicher (7un for " .95 con—lete with switches.
I indicated in an earlier memo that t•,e cour on squad cars
came in $1705.U0 lower than budc;etec" o I h ey available
in capital outlay.
I request permi.. . t. t,• pur rase the light bar.
;J: Mayor at. ty
FROM: Mark Bei nhardsc. ty Adlninistr. a• �:
.",warded _oval to purchase the light bar within
capital f•_, in 1986 Budqet.
PROPOSEI 401 .-..e,: c.,y _, sec.anded b} to authorize
r,,r chase F i , jut- �—i from i f—1 budget funds
Ayes
42186.1
2 01? 0
T,:: Mayor
and City Council
Uae vY GF p�
FkOK: Mark
Bornhardson, City
`` �' +
Administrato�,�, v\\
DATE: April
21, 1986
SUB61st::; : Zoning Amendment
Attached are a number of zoning amendments that were introduced
to the Planning Commission back in August of 1985. They wf2Le
base,-], in part, on discussicfis that staff had held with Council
regarding case last summer involving selected items in she
zoning code. These. ite;ns are introduced to you at this ling
and they will be brought back for discussion at our May 1 1986
meeting. If you have any questions or comments, plgfase tut us
kno•• hat your ic,a,, in the interim, so that we can address
youz -;ncerns at the M;. 12th meeting.
It is -,ur reconimenda..ion that these be adoptef t;.. . Ming.
PROPOSED MOT'ON - Moved by , seconded by , that the Council.
aving identified any initial concerns with the amendments table
_his item - itil it's meeting on May 12, 1986. Ayes , 'Nays
TO: Mayor But..,r and Council
FROM: Jeanne A. MabLsth, Zoning Administrator
DATE: April. 23, 1986
SUBJ: Proposed 'Zoning Amendment
The following arena' ent was approved by the Planning Commission at a
special meeting in February of this year. The original amend,ent was
presented in August of 1985 at a public hearing before the Planning
Commission. ThFr_e has been little public interest in the various sections
proposed for amendment.
A. Definitions
Commercial Operations _ operations where business is conducted by the
sale or ex -an of goods and/or services on site for money or other
valuable . ,ns-deri-tion except _for tho__se provided for in the home
occupationi secti� _ _
Need to define a commercial operation f the purpose of
interpreting other sections of the code. 5t, has underlined
the last section because we question the need to address the
commercial uses allowed under the home occupation ordinance cited
in this specific definition section. Why not other quasi
commercial uses cited in the code.
Riding Academy - A building, structure or other facility which is
used for the instruction and training in care and handli nor a fee
or other valuable consideraticn.
Stables and Barns - Private - A building or structure used or it :ed
to be used for housing horses, mules, donkeys, or ponies belongl,iq to
the occupant of the property, and kept. for noncommercial purposes.
Riding Acadc use is noted in the code but lacked direction ir. a
�J, `inition. L.Ute the ' 5G feet setback from the nearest :. ,t line
...Is been omitted so as not to conflict with required setback
standards recommended later in code amendment. These changes
result much from the di.sc.u-lion surrounding the Kokesh
application andthe neAd to escablish approved levels for such
private/co.nmercial opere-tions.
'iarL. toquirements - Those req-•irem, s which relate exclusi vell }o the
SIZE, o7 yara areas w' such -.re required within specific zoning
districts.
Definition needed to distinguish hotween setback standards. our
code contains Loth setback and yard standards.
Zoning Amendment
April 23, 1986
Page 2 of 7
B. Section 10.03 Subdivision 9(D)
No detached garage or other accessory building shall be located nearer
the front or street lot line than the principal building on that lot
except on lots which have frontage on a lake and rear Yard adjacent to
a street, accessory buildings located within the street or rear yards
of such lots are subject to the setback requirements of Section 10.23,
Subdivision 6B, Section 10.24, Subdivision 5B and Section_ 10.25,
Subdivision 6B exc_edt that detached garag2-q ay be located 10 feet
.from the street or rear lot line when doors 1Uce away from the street
and a turn -around is proap provided on site. This section shall not ply
to lakeshc�re lots divided by roadways or corner lots.
This section has been amended allowing detached garages 10 feet
off street right-of-way as long as a turnaround is provided on
site - we've been attempting to do this for the past six years.
Staff has also Blade sure that laiceshore lots intersected by roads
and corner lots are excluded.
C. Section 10.03 Subdivision 18
A. No new "stock farms" shall he created or existing stock farms
enlarged more than twenty five percent (25%) over the total number of
animals that existed on the farm as of JanuaEy 1, 1975 with animals
over one year old except. under the provisions of a conditional use
permit. In considering any such permit, the maximum number and type
of anima is to be kept sha 1 1 be determined j�y the Cou,rci 1. The site
design and method of operation shall be reviewed and the Council. shall
find that the proposed or existing "stock farm" will not in its
opinion be detrimental to the public safety and the general welfare.
Crop farms and the keeping of animalfor non-commercial purposes
are addressed under the respective conditional use permit or
assessory sections of the cede.
The commercial keeping of animals such as that suggeste3 by stock
farm e i s only addressed in this sect ion of the code. other
lev.'s of commercial uses associated with animals are addressed
in proposed aL, ndmer,t5 dealing with riding academies or stables
and barns - public. This section is not in conflict with the
rural zoning sections that allows '-e non-rommercia 1 keeping of
animals as an approved accessory use.
B. The establishment of' any new bui lding for the housing of animals or
fowl shall be .located 150 feet from the nearest lct line.
This section has been amcnced in order to assure 150 feet setback
is maintained from let line and not from the rearest off -site
residence and also to be consistent with other sections of code
hat require, 150 feet setl• c•k frow lest lines for all animal
bates.
Zoning Amendment
April 23, 1986
Page 3 of. 7
D. Section .10.20 Subdivision 3 I.
L. Farms -(Crop and Stock) Provided that the area is ten or more
acres.
Plannina Commission suggested that this section he amended to set
minimum area standards for new stock farms in conjunction with
amendments of Section 10.03 Subdivision 18.
E. Section 10.03 Subdivision 21
Exception. The requirements of Subdivision 19 are not intended to
govern the normal and customary grading in the area of an existing ur
a newly constructed building, or the grading of the driveway serving
sucli building, nor to any movement under 100 cubic yards which doeE
not adversely impact the existing drainage. Such grading and earth
moving shall be approved by the Building ID.:,pector at the time of
issuance of the building permit, providing that a plan showing
r,roperty drainage and protection of adjoining property has been
submitted. Any unusual earth f:.11ing, removal or yradi_ng proposed
a builder shall be referred by the Building Inspector to the Planning
Commission and the Council for action in accordance with this Chapter..
Normally earth movements of 100 cubic yardor more should be
considered unusual; `- -" s _
The first underlined section is a staff amendment providing
ordinance authority for the land alteration permits issued by
staff for the Feast five years. Note under 100 cubic yards.
The last :underlined section is sucgested by the Planning
Commission as a standard for staff to use in determining unusual
land movement. when reviewing building plans. Staff advised that
every building permit issued this year or in yeai; past involved
the movement of 100+ cubic yards of earth. Driveway construction
in rural lots can run 300 to 400 cubic yards movement alone.
The Planning Commission asks that the City Engineer assist in
establishing a standard. In light of th-i Ulrich project,
commission mer,bers find the current ordinance too subjective -
staff should have clear standards.
F. Amend Section 10.22 Subdivision 3
Tree Removal Regulations - no trees within 75 fc-et cf the shoreline
with the diameter of six (6) inches or more sha 1 1 be removed without
first obtaining a permit from the City.. Such permits shall be issued
by Cif staff Provided thaT at least a mike number of replacement
trees of Ta�nature t i placement ac�cept.able to the staff are Planted,
a qulestion invol vine the number of trees to be replaced wi. l 1 re u� ire
Council approval. ~ ^ i
_..
Zoning Amendment
April 23, 1986
Page 4 of 7
The amendment will pzovide staff the necessary authority and
direction in issuing permits for tree removal - no longer
requiring Council approval.
G. Section 10.08 Subdivision 3(A)
Add the following performance standards:
(8) The special conditions applying to the structure or land in
question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining
property.
(9) The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures
in the district in which said land is located.
(10) The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation
at,d enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
(11) The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair
health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary
to the intent of the Zoning Code.
(12) That the granting of such variance will not merely serve as a
convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate
demonstrable hardship or difficulty.
In the recodification of the code, these specific standards
applicable in all variance reviews were omitted.
If. Section 10.20 Subdivision 3
Recreation Areas. Private gun clubs, archery ranges, ski slide,
provided the area is fenced and no part of the principal use is less
than 150 feet from any lot line.
Note riding stables has been omitted from this section and
replaced with a separate section for riding a:7ac'em;Planning
Commission has also asked that the required setback of 100 feet
be changed to 150 feet.
I. Section 1.0.20 K a M (Re -letter K to M and versr,)
K. Antenna. Structure. One .independent antenna structure with antenna
or combination of antenna attache(: thereto; subordinate to and
servicing the principal use or structure on the same lot and
customarily incidental thereto that is nct attached to another
structure provided the height of the antenna structure does not exceed
65 feet and the antenna structure is set back from any lot line a
distance at least (,dual to the total height. of the antenna structure.
Zoning Amendment
April 23, 1986
Page 5 of 7
M. Animals. The keeping of dornestic animals for non-commercial
purposes including horses for the use of the occupants of the
premises. A minimum of one acre in aggregate, exclusive of one acre
for the principal building, must be available for each animal unit,
except as hereinafter set forth. A minimum of two acres of open
pasture must be available for each additional horse. When the horses
are kept stabled and do not require pasture for feed purposes, the
minimum pasture requirement may be adjusted at the discretion or. the
Council. Such minimum pasture acreage shall not include low luing
lands unusable for pasture cr grazir.y. Any person keeping such
animals must. comply with the provisions of the City Code.
Somehow in the process of recod ification their letter
des.;.gnations were exchanged. Note also the 150 setback distance
for structures housing animals has been removed and now addressed
in proposed amendment for stables and barns - private. This
section only deals with standards for nor. -commercial keeping of
animals. Stuck Farms and stables and barns - public sections
establish rr re restrictive setback standards for commercial use.
J. Section 10.20
Add the following new cond-It.ional uses:
N. Stables and Barns - Private. The use of an accessory building for
keeping animals for non-commercial purposes provided it is for t;1e
nor. -commercial use of the property owner or resident and meets the
ai lable area :tend-rds outlined in paragragh M of th- s subsection.
-thtr, no such structure shall be closer than 15U feet to the
t.. .rest adjacent residence and no closer 4-.har 75 feet from the nearest
lot line.
0. Stables and Barns - Pubs ic. the use of accessory buildings or land
for the storage or rearing of animals not owned by the property owner
or resident. Such must meet the requirements of paragragh M of this
subdivision. Further, no such structure shall be closer than 150 feet
from the tic>areat: lot line.
P. Riding Academy - Any such instruction maintainer' as a accessory use
and conducted by the owner shall meet the re luirements of. Section M,
N, and O of this subdivision and no such instruction shall occur at
least 100 feet from an adjacent residence of clo:;er than 75 feet the
nearest lot line.
The new conditional uses are suggested in order to set standards
and limits on the quasi commercial uses associated with our rural
areas.
Zoning Amendment
April 23, 1986
Page 6 of 7
K. Section 10.22 Subdivision 1 (Entire section of code to be amended as
follows)
Subdivision 1 Lakeshore Set. Back regulations. The setback from the
shoreline for lakeshore lots:
A. Shall be 75 feet for all structures except that fences under 42"
may be permitted within that .,etback area. On lakeshore lots divided
by a major thoroughfare the following structures are permitted on the
lakeshore portion of such lots within 75 feet of the lake and require
a building permit from the City:
1. Lock boxes net to exceed 20 square feet in area and 48 inches
in height; and
2. Fences not exceeding 72 inches but shall not exceed an average
height of 42 inches above the height of the crown of the
intersecting road.
B. No principal or accessory structure shall. be located within 75 feet
of the lakeshore nor closer to the lakeshore than the average distance
from the shor.: line of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots
(Refer to diagrams Orono Manual of Design Standards and
Specifi-ations) except.rthat this does not apply to structures allowed
in suh3ec tion A above.
In light of recent Council acti—, y ay amen: sub -section A
omitting allowed fencing within protected setback area. Th..
amendment was proposed because b :a f felt the current code was
not specific as the City had all -_,wed 3-1/2' or 42 inch fences
within the protected area.
Subsection B would now include accessory structures uncle. - ►e
average setback standard. The average setb,ick line would no
longer refer to "nearby lots" but the adjacent lots -- the most
affected by new construction. Please also note the reference to
a design manual..
Diagrams shall be drafted by the stAff showing how the setback
line is determined for var;.,,d lakeshore properties.
L. Section 10.22 Subdivision 2
Amend section as fc'_ows:
Subdivision 2 Within 75 feet cif shoreline thext, she 11 be no
excavat{.ng,�filling, hardcover, temporary or permanent structur,�s
Cxce t as permitted under Subdivision I of this section. w4_thin 75 tc
250 feat of the shore3ine there shell he no greater than 251
hardcover. Within 500 feet to 1,600 feet of the shoreline !hare shall
be no greater than 35% hardr -c
Zoning Amendment
April 23, 1986
Page 7 of 7
Section added to prevent any misunderstanding creased by
amendment above and for purposes of clarity.
M. 10.27 Subdivision 4
A. Subparagraphs M and N
10.28 Subdivision 4
A. S.-,paragraphs M and N
Add reference to N tc, include new use. - stables and barns -
private - additional. standards or controls for non-cn---�rcial
keeping of animals.
N. Section 10.03 Subdivision 7
Unt Buiiding Per Lot. Except in the case of Planned Residential
Developments as provided for hereinafter, no more than one principal
building shall be located on a lot e -ot that staff may _ssue a
permit to use a manufactured home that shall meet ail required
setback standards or an e'xiating dwelling while a new Principal
structure is being roEjtructed. Such permit shall be issued- for a
Period of 3 months any extensions must be approved Ily the Cily and
shall ex ire upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new
structure and such structure removed.
This amendment will provide the legal means to permit the
temporary use ..f trailers or existing dwellings during
construction of new residence.
O. Section 10.31 Subdivision 14
Open Burning Prohibited. 1t .is unlawful for any person to start or
allow to burn any open fire on any property within any "RE" District
without a permit except as permitted under the Uniform Fire Code.
The existing code does not allow any unregulated burri ng but the
Uniform Fire Code, does a]low for portable gas stoves or
barbeques.
TO: Mayor IIut 1°. r and Council .M_��`04;,rf_ ,t".�-
Mark E. Bern' nrdson, City Adminis:.r-it [lNG
Thomas J. ua- 1:_)s, Building Official
Jeanne A. Mabustt:, Zoning Administrator �'�' ? 3 i�u
Joan Lattin, Assistant Finance Director
i GF Mamrktft
u
FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zc:ning Adm,nistrator
DATE: April 24, 1986
SOBJ: Request for Refund of Building Permit #5939 dated 4/16/8u For a Ne-,, Residence at 1450 Tanglewood Road, Owner Art Nelson
The above referred building permit was issued to Kangas Builders on
4/16/86. On 4/17/86 staff w s notified by Jamez Kangas that Mr. Nelson had
received an offer on his home and tie adjacent lot on which he as
intenuing to build his new home, and that all plans to commence
construction were "on hold". Subsequently, Mr. Kangas discussed the
matter with staff and then submitted a letter requesting a refund of the
permit fees and voidance of the permit.
It is staff's recommendation t- make a partial refund as follows:
Total
;mt. to be
Amt. u be
Paid
Refunded
Retained
Building Permit Fee
$ 935.50
S 835.50
$ 100.00
State Surcharge
151.00
150.00
---
Plan Review Fee
467.75
---
467.75
SAC Charge
475.00
475.00
---
TOTALS
$2028.25
S1460.50
$ 567.75
The $567.75 to be retained will adequately cover staff costs c. the
completed Plan Review and all cite inspections completed or anticipated
with regard to restoration of the site. Excavation which was done cn the
site will be required to be restored to original grade and seeded by May
9, 1986, in order to eliminate any potential safety or er,!-:ion hazards on
the site.
Related to this, W'rimer Bros. Inc. also obtained emit for the septic
system at 1450 Tanglewood on Apr. i 1 16, 1986, permit U. 422, in the amount of
$75.50, and has similarly requested a refund. Staff. recommends approval of
refund of the entire amount.
Proposed Motion: Moved by , seronded by , City Council direct the
staff to issue a --rtiaf_refur n the amount of S1460.50 to Kangas
Rui friers Inc. for Building Permit 3939 datF:A 4/16/86, with the balance of
the fees paid to be retained to cover incurred an,1 anticipated
administrative costs. Ayes , Nays
Proposed Motion: Moved by , st,cunded by , City Council direct staff to
issue a r^fi1nd in the amount. of $75.09 to Widmer Bros. Inc. for general
Permit 18422. Ayes Nays
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Kern -dson, City Administrate
Forwarded recornmerlding al..,.r oval.
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Bernhardsu-, City Administrate \k .1-0
DATE: April 25, 1986
SUBJECT: 1985 FIN_AI. Summary of Receipts, Disbursements and
Balances
Attached please find
:e ti-al copy
of :.985
Receipts and
Disbursements, the preliminary
of which
had been
transmitted t^
you for the February
0, 1936 Council
meeting.
Because th-.
preparatory work on the
1985 audit is not
concluded
staff has not
-analyzed 4-he comparison
)f financial. positions
from 1984 to 1985
but will. be doing so i-,
the next two months.
Notable variations froi., ,udget in the General Fund include dollar
values exceeding budget
Taxes 21,585
Licenses & Pecrr,its 39,661
Intergovernmertal Revenue 30,863
Chargcs for Scrvice 34,423
Fines 30,610
Interest on Investments 79,868
Much of 'tie "exceeding budget .amounts" was due to increased
buildi- nd lend use activity together with conservative
inves`-c result expectatio,ls. "his "overage" in int ment may
pay off in 1986 with the drastic drop in interest r as the
City did budget $142,000 for i•ivF.stm(-nt income for General
Fund in 1986 , up from $ 1 10,000.
Vie primary decrease in transfer.., was the decreased transfer fcom
the liquor store
Shoul- you have any questions or c-_-inmer.ts,- please feel free to
contact me.
PROPOSED M0TI(`3 - Move,i by , sec(.nded by 1. the Orono Counc:.i l
moves to accept the Final 1985 Summary of Receipts, nisbursemer,ts
ind Balances riated April `5, 1936. Ayes , Nays
('rrr (W ruin
!X~Ry CW iQl^l IM. , Dicalle"ONi'i AND r*AAM$9
25. 19W,
CASH
iAL
7MAL
U1IAt.CF
BUA;ET (Cl
TR to
1WW'". ,tUGSr (C) i .3t, IMMF':S'1.
WLLAnX--Ir. IWVLb7.
F''Yl WANC5
1,11/85
R17CE.IPTS
_-____-
1985
----------
1N
---- -----------------
SOLD LISBUFS. 1985 BUDGET CAN P'.il
---
12J t' 0 AktNag
:enera'_
$2,115,920
$2,233,77) (b)$1,922,043
c.@,850
---------- ------ ---------,--- _.._ _-_--
::1.890.:33 51,922,043 98.31 Sr"73 $
_ -- ---------
c'
Fe° Rev S`ar
".,486
32,168
32,000
_f,,855 52,0" 58.1i 36,85
Parks
111,136
11.15R
15.000
j,417 5,3ol 93.9i
l;6.J.
Coar,
0
125 -
(la )
Equip Outlay
155,884
25,736
102,263
60,756
42,731 49,395 M.74
1". 645
3119 Cap Outlay
53,221
4,713
20,00G
- -
',936
Wun St Aid Corst
61,455
267,937
111,220
220.1'
:.0. St Ai? Rd 9'.
".aog
42,4Sy
41,934
41,908 42,267 y'
S,G49
Per impr Rev
S
76, 73.„
67,594
101. e'E
Sp Assess 65--6
1,84. -D
28y,608
221,756
V 2,713 .,59"7 Iry ,4
974.be5
Sp Assess 90
334,b18
170,383
148,359
158,901 . . 97et is .6W
3.46A
Sp ASScss ;'
184,087
76,537
•l3,415
86,711 ,6,633 l".li
61
Sp assess 8`.
0
906,°•31
722,Q
a73
i �uor ?V
31, 75 7
5_!), 1 l
12F 140
(a)
519. OF 126,140 1) - - 5, 3,32
`;ter Jp
343,416
'
132,'y:
129.9N 132,794 97.2t
Sewer Op
1 9,130
?1
288,iwS
419.367 (•]; 288,705 14A.9F
..5
Iol f Course OP
24,298
97,200
(a)
87, 153 07, 2i0 -
;, a%
Investment 4,335,122
',4,335,1221
14,43i,115 371,488 - i5.i57,029 (l,959.ClC
4,;;i,d.s
Fun
7"7*.LS 4,315,122
_===.=... =a
-__- ----- ----------------------
1,354 SS11-4,027
........ r..a...a;c_a.:.II=
53.251,r+isa
........ slam
_".------__----_--- ------------ ------------------ ------------_.�__.-
$131,60b 5.4,43%115 $5,033.6% $., Mr; 96$101,606 .15,1157,824
.................-.xn-.-- --sass::_:xi._........i............................
�- ---
$166,371 S4,s-y,d:c
'.:. 1-,,S14,175,663
$67,876
$4,419,103
$3,198,719
$146,886
...............
Vi,509.840 54,246,166 $3,157, $146,�88 $18,66,`,299
a
531,354
•ii'Z ................
IIiiisaa_aSi-....S=xxs..__a_a_i_=-.II.-a....m......i.ii.
am.2 'saa.......... ...........
II .............
,"M 1985 C&SH i INVES7*4zr" 'r- 12/31,185
--<-. RAI, r-,.,Z) T71MAW - 1985:
-----------------------------
------
NO'fC (a; Liquor and golf :rating funds b,egets •+.o xi
6 or
include amounts for purcl .:es for resale at saves tax
9i...1--W'
B13D 7
col1^cted cr remitted. The receipts budgets protect only
----------------- ---------------------__----
5 vs protits - not total receipts.
"axes S
891.4 23
$969,818 •
10..5�
Licenses e Per-
102,811
63,150
162.ss
NU-. (b) General fund revenues reco-Ied w :1 not equal
Into.gov. Revem,
385.698
354,835 •
108.7.
rer- ,,sts collected due to receivables :led in ott_r
Chgs for Sery
47J.893
439,470
107.8%
gun' periods and non-revxiue receipts.
`'i-A-S
61, t:10
31, 0P0
198. 7x
Int. On invest.
189,868
110,000
172.os+�
(c)i3 amounts include: soled L.3nsfPCS, do irf
'*ran. Fr Oth Funds
20,850
45 -50
45.5%
include fund lalance uses or m3dit .-is.
'w`:Ar
24, 364
11 m
306.4%
Rec. ;oliected
-
NCI£ (J) Scwer operating fund reeeipta/d.stx:rsemrrts :nclud.
For Others
-_
-
_
the water operating utility billings amounts oc;ilectr+ thr
sewer :;periting fund and disbursed to the wa -r op
^CP-1L P.EVIP-WE $Z,150.517
$1,922,143
111.9s
fund.
cis)
c•) Ad3 istment for Credit iz by Sate
CITY (Y Mw
SlsI+IARY (r RFLT.IM, D1'Wnt;t7►7JP: AN) MAXIES
KIR WE M(if1H Or 11["N" 1 "',
4r1I 25, It%
: ;iWNI Ir,
----------------
CAS`!
SkLvcz
F_?F) !WA,v'F,
12/1 `85
-,enera?----
S'10551346
� ,+? Rev Shar
11, 886
3r
117,180
'DS;
(34 )
'q ip outlay
135,437
'I"i-, cap nut'.3v
57,422
`!aIn St Ai-1 okra
281.799
r.C. St Aim *ti M
51319
-'er Intpr R-:
97,918
Sp .ssess 65-75
882,471
qp ',ssess 87
2851254
�:o Assess 82
152,059
�p -ssess 65
298.657
..1,, for Mtn
11,792
r:3ter `lp
5,259
Sever ,
235.468
Golf r_o.:rse Op
40,746
-rle.l 'nv 4,545,225
(4,543,432)
Tr ran 1
;nIM
BUDGET (C)
7RA?EF
IMMIP15
1985
iy
$595,5-44
(b)51,922,e41
$5,303
%203)
32,003
l l97
151sea
12.5:16
102,263
51,682
514
23, no
1.420
29
41,934
4.015
92.314
221,756
60,901
148,359
21,804
123,415
2,691
51.0?2
126,146 (a)
.12,164
132,794
46.604
(d) 298,705
388
97,200 (a)
24,02
INVLTr.
sow DISBUIS.
$176,538
8
91
64,947
55
lie
SS
3i
117,745
35,622
1.'. , a"
58,242 (d)
5,278
813,772 26,455
:.TEAL
BIDGff (C) 1 Or TPANSF
1985 BIDGZT ULM
$1,922,043 9.2%SS9,73'
5-1.M .6% 11,945
6, 3W 4.9%
49,395 0.0%
42,267 9.44
352,597 .0%
144,978 .0%
86.631 .f1
126,149
132,7.94 9.8%
2"1 as 20.21
g7,200 (a) -
t34DING
:7St1
!VV ST. BA ASM INJ4. T.
FUHC IASW 121' 31/0`. B
$2, 419,673
(1710)
Al2,377
u25)
1".64S
77,936
22D. In
S.C48
101,676
974, 61t5
346.IOG
173,83J
191,W1
22, SC-:
24. 35's
2: 3, 835
35, Wk
1,I27,581 (4.959,OJO 4.959,036
--- ---- ---
54,i45,225 $130,277$948.627 $3,251,6095'6,682 $913,772 $4%,722---$3,300.962-v------$76,692 51,227.%3 $168,371 $4,959.iA
-- ---a....z___aria-aas---.-a--..a..a..a....ae.us.s...sssss...s............a.a...............aaa.a:-s-...... as.a.e......... .............
y S L
=AS'; 53,770,252 $85,262 $998,'29- $3,198,719 572,606 $878.675 $437,767 $3.157,553 572,606 $1, w .AS Si1,3S4
JWR mszazz...sass.....aa..a... z" .==z.aa..... . --........a a a-W.......................... sale.mass..............
aa as
?KML 1985 ckgt ► INVEM Il M M 12/3L,85 55.127.W
...........
^^" 7,L Ft.-r SJ! 4,*,0 - 1985:
1 -F
REVMUE
SLWLf
SUrIET
----- ------------ -
^axes
$424,12
5869,d38 •
48.R%
i :Permits
4,_-0
63,150
7.4%
Int:rgo V,.-nae
55,6�3
354,335 •
15.7%
-1r3s for Sery
66,423
439,470
15.1%
Firms
17,35-
31,003
56.0%
Int. On Inv-st.
83,054
1101900
75.5%
^ran. �r Oth Finis
5,000
45,853
10.9%
•h,+r
7,94'
7,"1
100.5%
Colleted
-
Fot OtSers
--
-
-
:UML W-IFMT 5664,424 $1,922,943 ?'
(b)
WMEE (a) Liquor and Wlf ^perating finds budgets do not
include amounts for purct:ases foe resale or saies tax
collected or remitted. The receipts budgets r-:olect anif
gross profits - not total receipts.
IDf'E (b) General fund re .3 recorded will not equal
receipts collected due t ..aivables billed in other
acc, +xmt i ng p -rinds ant non- re venue race ipts.
NM (c) 3udget amounts include setwdu l ed transfers, do not
inc 1 ude fund to l anoe uses car additions.
VIXT. (1) sever operating fund receipts/disbursements include
the water k*r.rating utility billings amounts collected in the
sever operating fund and disbursed to the water operating
fund.
(+) Adjustment for Nowstea.'_ Credit paid by State
42386.2 O
i ING
TO: Mayor and City Council
C
IN
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City AdministratojLl.�
DATE: April 23, 1986
SUBJECT: iazardous 3uilding Proceedings - 2941 Casco Point Road
Attachec' please Find a resolution to commence hazardous buildings
proceedings on '.he garage on the above location. Thy_: property
owner is just r;..w being informe,3 via letter with a cop; of this
proceeding, he has not been previously contracted on th matter.
The reason we are moving expeditiously on this matter is tLat the
roof cave-in on this garage creates a hazard to children, a:. r.he
garage sits in an embankment and children can climb up to the 17.op
an,] could very possibly fal 1 in. Additionally to commmenct,ig
hazardous buildings proceedings the B�iilding Inspector nas
orderefl that the building be secured and will be working with the
property owner to secure the top with appropriate measures until
such time as the problem can he corrected.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that Council adopt
resolution number commencing hazardous buildings proceedings
against the garage structure at 2941 Casco Point Road. Ayes
Nays
CITY of ORONO
Pcwt Office Box 66•CryaLal Hay. Minnesota LF=*MU&jCipa1 otkM
On the North .Shore of Lake Minnetonka
April 24, 1986
Paul Christy
2941 Casco Point Road
Wayzata, M14 55391
RE: 2941 Casco Point Road - Hazardous Bldg - Garage
Dear Mr. Christy:
We have recently received complaints regarding the uns4`e
condition of an unoccup_ed building, which we understand you own,
located at 2941 Casco Point Road.
The building has been damaged by lack of maintaince and is left
in an unsafe condition and is subject to incipient collapse.
Since it is open to trespassers and children frequently playing
therein, it constitutes a definite hazard. Therefore, under th=:
provisions of Uniform Building Code 203 of the Rate Building
Code, we request that you immediately proceed to demolish this
building.
If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at my
office.
Sincerely,
F""175
Thomas J. Jac bs
Building official
Enclosure - State Building Code :section Uniform Building Code 20=
CC: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator.
Mel Rilbo, Police Chief
Mound Fire Department
City Attorny
IH'It0110; a /l^t%(A - 473-7337 • ALIMMISMATKA & FINAW't 47)7358 0 �I�.ICfwf�t 473.73"
ASSFSSING
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
A RESOLUTIONi ORDERING "ATEMENT
OF HAZARDOUS BUILDING ACTION AT
2941 Casco Pt. Road, Orono
WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota;
and.
WHEREAS, Paul Christy, 2941 Casco Pt. Road, Wayzata,
Minnesota, 55391; is the fee owner of record of property located
at 3220 Watertown Road, Orono, Minnesota, herein referred to as
the Property, and legally described as follows:
Lot 92 ar:d the Sely 30ft of lot 93 also the Sely 30ft of lot 104
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono, having
duly considered the matter pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
Sections 463.15 to 463.261, hereby finds that the above described
property is uninhabitable and contains unsanitlry and hazardous
conditions which constitute a public nuisance and which makes
this property hazardous to the public health, safety and welfare
based on the following findings:
1. Roof caved in
2. Rafters rotten
3. Electrical not hooked up - but improper wiring
4. Concrete block wall caving in on two sides - (north i
west walls)
5. Building le4t open to public
6. Building if in a state of deterioration and
dilapidation, thus it is a safety and health hazard
pursuant to Minnesota State Building Code/Uniform
Building Code, Section 203.
7. Orders to remove the structure were issued by the
Building Official on April. 24, 1986. These orders have
not been complied with.
Page 1 of 2
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
NOW, TEUMPORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the City Council of the City of Orono, pursuant to the
foregoing findings and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes
Sections 4fi3.15 to 463.261 hereby orders the owner(s) of the
property to raze and remove the structure on the property. The
Council further orders that all personal property or fixtures
that may unreasonably interface with the razing be removed within
twenty (20) days of the service of this order or the City of
Orono may remove and sell such personal property or fixtures at a
public auction in accorclan.ce with the law.
2. The City Council of the City of Orono further carders that
unless this corrective action is taken or an answer is served
upon the City of Orono and filed in the office of the Clerk of
District Court of Hennepin County, Minnesota, within twenty (20)
days from the date of the service of this order, a motion for
suminary enforcement of this order will be- riade at District Court
of Hennepin County.
3. That the City Council of the City of Orono further orders
that if the City is compelled to take corrective action herein
all necessary costs expended by the City will be assessed against
the real estate concerned and collected in accordance with
Minnesota Statute, Section 463.22.
4. That the
City Council of the City
of Orono
hereby authorizes
and directs
the Mayor, City
Clerk,
City Attorney, and other
officers and
employees of the
City to
take such
action, prepare,
sign and serve such papers as
are necessary to
comply with this
Order and to
assess the cost
thereof
against
the real estate
described ahove
for collection►
along with taxes.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono,
Minnesota, this � _ clay of. . 1986
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk
APPROVED:
Mary C. Butler, Mayor
PAge 2 of
42486.1 c'
fi
f.P iR 2 3 19270
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Bernhardsor,, City Administrator ,
DATE: April 24, 1986
SUBJECT: City Deed for Pence Lane
As noted in the attached letter, the City vacated Pence Lane in
May, a984, which is the appropriate action if this was an
easement dedicated on a plat. This particular easement however,
was given to the City by a separate deed. In order to have the
property revert to the abutting land owners, it requires Council
action to execute a quit claim deed.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the Orono
City Council execute the appropriate quit claim deed reserving to
the City the appropriate perpetual easements. Ayes R_, Nay:s
WAYNE G. POPHAM
ROGER W. SCHNOBRICH
DENVER KAUFMAN
DAVID S. DOTY
ROBERT A. MONISM
ROUE' A. WOROEN
O. MARC WHITEHEAD
BRUCE D. WILLIS
IREDr1lICK S. RICHARUS
O. ROBERT JOHNSON
GAR♦ R. MACOMBEII
ROBERT S. SURK
HUG. V. PLUNKETT,ED
IREDERICK C.BROWN
THOMAS K. BERG
JAMES R.STEOLEN
POPHAM, HAIK. SCHNOBRICH, KAUFMAN & DOTY. LTD.
4344 IDS CENTER
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA SS402
♦ELE (HONE AND TELECOPIER
612 - 333 -4600
JAMES B. LOCKHART
ALLEN W. HINDERAKER
CLI/IORD M.GREENE
O,WILLIAM KAUFMAN
MICHAEL O. IREEMAN
HOW'ARD SAM MYER8.111
THOMAS C.D'AQUIIA
LARRY D. ESPEL
.;ANTE S. MAYERON
THOM AS J. B.O•RR11 TT
JAMES A. PAYNE
CAVIL, A. JONES
LEE E. BHEEHY
ALAIN /RECON
LESLIE GILLETTE
MICHAEL T. NOLAN
Ms. Jeanne Mabust►-,
City of Orono
Box 66
Crystal Say, MN 55323
ROBERT H. L"NN
ROBERT C. MOILANEN
THOMAS I. NELSON
THOMAS J. RADIO
DAVID L. MASHMALL
KATHLEEN M. MARTIN
JOHN C.CHI;.OS
DOUGLAS P. SEATON
THOMAS E.SANNEII
BRUCC B. MS PH Ef. T'I�S
GARY D ISLA' .vRG
SCOTT E. RICHTL T
ONEGORY L WILMES
ELIZADETN A. tHOMPSON
KEITH J. HALLELAND
MARK S. P=TE RSON
TIMOTHY W. KOCK
JULIE A. SWEITZEP
THOMAS C. MIELENHAUSEN
KATHLEEN A-BLATZ
MICHAEL O.CHRISTENSON
J,MICHAEL SCH WARTZ
LARAYE M OSBORNE
MARK I. PALMA
PONNIE G. RESNICK
RU, NELL S.PONESSA
BRYA ' L.CRAW LORD
DAVID . -VOEN
OWEN E. HEM.. �ADT
MATTMEW E.DAML-
C/COVNSCL
FRED L.MOPRISON
April 23, 1986
Re: City Deed for. Pence Lane to Private Party
Dear Jeanne:
.240 AMHOIST TOWER
349 ST.■ETER STREET
SAINT PAUL.MINNCBOTA 38102
TELEPHONE
0I8-333-4074
SUOTE f400
1200 SEVENTEENTH STREET
DeNVtIt, COLORA00 SIOi02
TELEPHONE 103-BS)-ISOO
TELECOPIER 31C12-801 219.
Suitt ZOO SOUTH
1400 M STREE r. N. W.
WASHINGTON, 0. C 20030
TELr PHONE I8080 0110-5300
Tr Lr Co PIER 1&OZI *as- 5316
DIRECT DIAL
344-0549
As you are aware, the City has been requested to transfer
its fee title interest in property known as Pence Lane, to private
parties. The request has come from Mr. Gerald Carroll, the
attorney for the private parties.. Pence Lane is legally described
as Lot 8, Auditors Subdivision No. 344.
The City vacated Pence Lane on May 14, 1984 through
Resolution No. 1636. Pence Lane was originally deeded to the
City, rather than dedicated through a plat. Therefore, since
title was originally transferred to the City, a vacation of the
property does not rid the City of its interest in thn land.
Because the City is still in fee ownership of Pence Lane or Lot 8,
Auditors Subdivision No. 344, the City must transfer its title to
the property in order to dispose of it.
Mr. Carroll has requesters that the City deed the property to
Michael G. Pluhm and Susanne Pluhm, Franklyn ;. Dailey and
Patricia L. Dailey and William Z. Mernik. These people are the
same indivi.dLIAIS who requested the vacation which was effected in
1984.
V Z �
April 23, 1986
Page 2
I am enclosing a quit claim deed for the Mayor and City
Clerk's signatures. I am also sending Mr. Carroll a copy of this
letter and the deed so that lie may review it for his clients. If
he has any concerns as to the way the deed is worded, I will
contact you immediately.
Please note that the City is granting this property subject
►(, a pertetual easement for utility purposes and subject to a
p-rpetual non-exclusive easement for road purposes. A road and
utilities agreement, as required �the Resolution No. 1636, has
begin executed by tho requesting parties and was filed with the
HAn►:eoin County Recorder on April 10, 1986 as document no.
197637. This agreement also reserves to the City a perpetual
easement for itility purposes and a perpetual non-exclusive
easement for road purposes.
Due to the fact that the City is transferring puhlic
property to a private party, a council action is required.
Mr. Carroll requested that this matter be brought before the City
Council at its April 28, 1986 meeting.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
very truly yours,
Xi _
r -14
��•�
0 ncy F.J Husnik
_gal Assistant
NEH/jf
Fnclosure
cc: Mr. Gerald Carroll
Ms. Kathleen Hlatz
8162f
to ..'.;. pi l d
No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate
of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required
Certificate of Real Estate Value No,_____
_ ,18
County Auditor
by
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: 1111
Date
D puty
-I
- 1986 .�
(reserved for recording data)
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, City of Orono
a municipal curpuratiop under the laws of
Minnesota Grantor, hereby conveys and quitclaims to Michael G. P.Iuba-_Arl"unanne
i'iuLat�JiLLthand and wtfa I_ Dailey, husband+ Grantee(el,
real propa,ty in _ R■nnenin County, Minnesota, deacrhe.l as follows -
Lot 8, Auditors Subdivision No. 344 In Section 11, Township i:i, Range 23.
Subject to a perpetual easement fur utility purposes over, under and
above the above -cited property.
Subject to a perpetual non-exclusive easement for road purpoeeS.
hand wife, and William Z. Mernik, divorced and unrenerried,
i.l owe e»c. a tiodN con,Mw e. heck!
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto.
By— - -----
Its __2LLyuz
By
Ito rlry t'Lrk y
STATE OF MINNESOTA —
COUT TY OF
The fore.toing was acknowledged before me this _ _— day of
LY - ,sy 1�-�{ti �i-—__._._ —. and _ ILt.r Y H_ 11 4- _
the —_-- Mayo- Ytd_�jstr_tl sy _
under the law► of xiartesuta , on behalf of the
NOTARIAL STAMP Oa aaAL IOR Ol""ma OaaANN) I
iIGNAOr talaON TAmntO Ac'�i/OwCj
T.■ w.«l.Mr a. N. ,w .r./�.. �Tr.A►.e a mar wNti.�. r.w
TYM t1leTatlafmmrT tY aaallam n1 �raan a>,e salaYMN
Popham, Rails, Schnobvich, Kaufman
Duty
4344 IDS Center
Kinneopolis, Minn. 55402
M
1
P1
Cite Of ORONO
AF&OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 16 ) 6 —
A RLSOLUTION VACATINC AN UNIMPRO'VZD
PUBLIC RICE? OF UAT KNOWN AS PENCE LAIZ
MITBIN AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 314,
SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 117, RAMGe 23 IM
Tilt CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA
WOZAEAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, on October 13, 1913, Franklyn t. Dailey, Michael C.
Pluhm and William Z. Mernik petitioned the C'it;� Counci l for vacat ton of
an unused portion of dedicated public roadway known as Pence Lane and
legally described as Lot I of Auditor's Subd:visior. No. 344, Secticn
21, Township 117, Range 23 in the City of hrono, Minnesota.
WeGRLAS, alter due publish*1 and posted notice, a public
hearing was held before the City Planring Coriaission on November 21,
1983, regarding said vacation and all r� •.)ns inte:ested were given an
opportunity to be heard; and
War LAS, after due study and consideration, the Planning
Coma+ission ecoai:ended approval of the vacation and the City Council
of the City of Orono finds that said vacation, as propos*d, Is in
keeping with the public interest in consideration of the following
findingsi
1. , is, vacation will nc•. affect access to or use f any
ad3,,ning property.
2. The City has not and does i L t intend to develop, impro% a or
use the property in any way except for utilities and access
purposes hereinafter described.
3. The property as it exists serves no public purpose.
MOM, TRZRZ.PORB ds ITRLSOLVED that the petition of Franklyn t.
Dailey, Michael G. Pluhm and William 1. msrnik is hereby granted and
that the unimproved public roadway known as Pence Large •nd legally
described above iq hereby vacated. The granting of the petition is
subject to the following conditionst
1. Upon vacation, the affected sroperty owners must execute
a road saintenance agreement to assure tha upkeep and
maintenance cf the private roadway.
Pogo 1 of 2
City of ORONO
AlkLV66M 0/ THl CITY COUNCIL
. Mo. 1636
2. Upon vacation the owners of Lot 29, ALS No. 191 and Lot 1,
clock 1, Walter& Fort oust execute a road and utilities
*&&anent granting special easement rights to the City over,
under and above Lot I of Auditor's Subdivision 311.
Adopted by the Orono City Council this llth day of
May
ATT '1rt
r
P...
Atbertik tr 4cityy ark Mary C. �. *r, Mayoc
`OtothX W. Hallin, Deputy City Clerk
TRANSFER ENTERED
ova -.Mix., Or .aortan IWICM
JLPI td so
lelcouhrf MINK
Page 2 of 2
w ETAtE OF M1NNCSMA
COUNTY Or N'.yNEPIN
CITY Or ORONO
The undersigned duly qualified and acting Deputy City
Clerk of the City of Orono hereby certifies that attached hereto
is a true ane correct copy of the originial Resolution passed
by the City Council of the City o: Oror..o on Nov 14,
19 84 , awy,ovinq Resolution NWAber 1614 _
on file in t e n I7ce of the City Clerk, C.ty o�Oro;�o.
.t
Dated.-
day of l9di .
42366.3
7
TO: Mayor and City Council
� "� 0- i� f�.
FROM: M- Bernhardson, City Administrator
DATB: ..ra 23, 1986 'i t'')(
SUBJRCT: Administrator's Information
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT - CRYSTAL BAY - As you will
rec fT—tWie Ci Fy ha Ttwo projects t + t were set up or the Crystal
Bay area. The first project, which was done last fall, was for
connection grants and used some of the monies that had been set
aside in 185 for that project. T1, City did not However,
received the number of applicants r ticipated and t._ actual
installation costs were about half of the original estimates.
Because this was money actually from 184 the City had to turn
back about $25,900 to the County for redistribution because we
had not used it by December 31, 1985, During the fall of '35
staff was also working through the County C.D.B.G. program to get
approval from HUD in Washington DC, to allow the City to do the
actual special assessments grant program. The City finally
received i Iroval of this in January and got out applications for
that. Fh:: same individuals that applied for the connection
program also applied for the special assessments program. Orono
then went to the County and requested that funds be given to
cover the entire assessment for all 10 of the applicants. In
order to do that however, Orono had to commit all the money that
the City had in 185/186 plus the S18,000 that would be %vailable
to us starting in August committedto the program and then based
on that, the County would redistribute to us the $25,090 that had
been turned back in plus an additional $10,000 from other funds.
Through direction from that Board however, was that w^ should not
pay off the entire grant however, under HUD regulations we had to
p. off a substantial portion therer
Orono Year X $25,137.00
(84/85)
Returned to County 12/85
Redistributed to Orono 3/86
Orono Year X1 $27,984.00
(85/86)
Orono year XII $19,764.00
(86/87)
County Distribution $ 9,863.00
3/86
Grant Monies S82,748.00 30 Assessment $92,350
Totals
Issues raised at the last Council meeting were two fold. The
first one is the issue of paying all of It off on the front end
with no repayment agreement. One of the City's initial desires
was to get a repayment agreement but under HUD regulations the
City was not able to do that and was fortunate to be able to do
the program at all. The second issue related to the availability
of funds in future years. The City had to use the monies coming
in -86 in order to get some of the funds back from the County to
do the project to the maximum benefit of the original applicants.
The City was unable to carry this money forward in the hopes of
getting it to applicants who qualified in future years, as the
City may well lose the funds. There is also a question related
to doing it on an annual basis as the entire C.D.B.G. program may
not be available after 1986 or 1987 given the Gramm-Rudman
budget balancing law. Should there be C.D.B.G. funds available
in 1987, and should the Council desire to put their money toward
grants if it rem,,•.ns an eligible activity, either in Crystal Bay
or perhaps in the Stubbs Bay area, if a sewer is being done, the
City may then undertake a program at that point. However, it is
not advisable to commit to such a program until that junction in
time is reached.
HIGHWAY 12 STUDY - Followin- he meeting on March 318t, in
consultation wTtTi John ShardlL. ` is decided to cancel our May
Sth Highway 12 study meeting (st_:f will be sending out a notice
to all the people on the mailing list regarding that) and will
come back on a meeting probably scheduled for June 2, 1986 to
address issues relating to quality, density and performance
standards. It is suggested that the City follow up that
discussion and work session with perhaps another meeting to again
f-cus on the Highway study specifically.
Should you have any questions or comments, please feel free to
contact me.
PAINTER'S CREEK WATERSHED PROJECT - As you may recall the
Ovate roTie3—undertook a sT gn rl�iCant project principally to address
water quantity in the Painter's Creek watershed from Lake Katrina
through western Orono into Minnetrista and eventually into
Jennings Bay. This project was undertaken in January 1985 and
completed In July of 1985. In addition to a addressing certain
quantity concerns it was anticipated that there would be some
desirable quality improvements principally from agricultural run
cff because of the addition of two sedimentation basins together
with some control of the flow in the retention areas. To date
the Watershed District does not feel that they had adequate time
to access the results, but will do so during the summer. This is
of importance �^cause the watershed is presently looking at
undertaking their next project in the Long Lake Creek area, the
vast majority of which is in Orono. This again would be both
water quality and quantity issues addressing water quality more
so than perhaps the Painter's Creek area. While staff at the
Watershed anticipated that they might undertake Long Lake Creek
for approval yet this year, it is the understanding from the
Board, that the Board would like to wait until they ha^e a more
definitive results from the Painter's Creek project.
Should you have any questinnn or comm-nts, please feel free to
. .ntact me.
a�
[.Pr. 2 s 1986
LIST OF LICENSES PUH COUNCIL APPROVAL
FOR MEETING OF April 28, 1986 uITV OF OR!)'t()
One Day Setup Permit - Art Center of Minnesota
2240 North Shore Drive
Saturday, May 3, 1986
Cigarette License - Wayzata Country Club
200 Wayzata Boulevard
Solicitors License - Blue Bell Ice Cream
3218 Snelling Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55406
Selling Ice Cream
Septic Systum Installers - Patnode Bros. Sewer 6 Water
16551 Lake Ridge Drive
Maple Grove, MN
Hayes Excavating
Route 1, Box 202
Montrose. MN 55363
Garbage 6 Refuse Collector - Orlin A. Redepenning
2076 County Road 90
Maple Plain, MN 55359
722� 3 �✓ �er+L^ n .,c_'rre /5
I. .,,,.. enmm, pmiuen F�Ip
• men.•.. .5 uoc
ape c..., cu., STATE OF MINNESOTA
at. exist. Mlnn..... 5510,
(algl 2g64160 DEPARTMENT OF PL•BLIC SAFETY
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO ONLY ALLOW CONSUMPTION & DISPLAY OF INTOXICATING LIOUC
IThh Application Shall Be Typewritten and Submitted Before June let of tech Yearl
In i minving the following questions "APPLICANT" shall be govemed as follows:
for a Partnership, one of the partners shall execute this application for all members of the partn... hip,
For a Corporation, one officer shall execute this application for oil officers, directors, and stockholders.
For a Club, one of the club officers shall execute this application for all the members. If additional
space is required, use a separate slice, of paper, indicating by number the question answered.
(FEE FOR PERMIT -)MW 19) $25.00
EVERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED
1.1. Susan Bilger 03 AAmini stral-iva Ane4 scan♦
IN. —.I nw.en r,uup .Mliuu.nl bnalamu.w.....rm.... leu,,... .........
for and in behalf of _
IMnn., n .I nwmm. rum..r t..osmron. run ,n..1 aael
hereby apply for a permit allowing consumption and display of intoxicating liquor to be located
97a6 tat..,rise Qhu, .e Municipality of Ay ---
to. ."n Net. numN.l
Post Office of jw gfs...t. , County of Reanneoin ,
Ios�n.aro .tee au,.M
State of Kruiesota, in accordance with the provisions of M.S. 340.119.
2. Will business be op -rated as a private club or public place Public
3. State type of hpiiness _ Fine and Performing Arta Education Center
4. FOR A PUBLIC BUSINESS! If a partnership, sinte name and address of each member of partnership;
a corporation, irate name ind address of officers and directors.
Susan Enright, President 5 Brown Road South, Long Lake
I b.m., laa4...1
Mary Smith, Vice-president 515 North Ferndale, Wayzata
Kathleen Nash, Secretary 18060 Shavers Lane, wavzata _
I N..—. Ien.,otl
5. FOR A PRIVATE CLUB: Date club was organized _ is club incorporated
number of member , length of time in present location , is club building owned i
rented what is the membership dues what are the requirements It
membership
Does club maintain lockers to be used by members for storinb oxicating liquor Names of r
officers and/or directors of the club:
5. FOR A PRIVATE CLUB: Dote club was organized __
number of members _ , length of time in present location
rented _ what is the membership dues
membership
is club incorporated
_ , is club building owned i
what are the requirements tc
Does dub maintain lockers to be used by members for stormy oxlcaung uquor
officers and/or directors of the club:
I AJJ,...1
IAnCnul
(^Od,..)
Names of a
I N.rnd
Innm.oi
Fnclose with this
application a copy of the Constitution
and
By -Laws of the club and current list of bur,
fide members.
6. If applicant or
any partner, corporation officer or
director,
club officer or d,rector, is not a citizen of tr•
United States, list
such noncitizens —0—
7. State name of
person who will operate or manage
business:
Karla McCray,
Executive Director
2316
Oliver Av S, Mpls 55405
B On what fluor
is the establishment located, or to
be located _Main
9 How are the premises
classified under the zoning
ordinance
Residential
Approved t.J VmlNpons by;
DO NOT USE
1.
ChpiM
Cast)
Rec'd.
10. State namt -,d addres of owrmr or owttcrn of building wherein the business will be rxated.
The Art Cr_*.�r
of Minnesota
2240 North Shore DRive
Wayzata
11.Has applit:r,l
it partnership, any partner; if
corporation, any officer or director'
:I club, any rl„
officer or dirr,.r,,
, "at had a license under the Minnesota
Liquor Control Art revoked or
upended ur ber
convicted lot any violation of State Laws or local
ordinances; if so, give date and details
12. 1% applicant; it partnership,
any partner: if
corporation, any officer or director; it elf!i,,
any club mlhr,
or director, a member of the
governing body
of the municipality or county in which this
permit is to I+
issued; it so, in what capacity
NO
13. Me; applicant; if lmrinership, any partner, if corpor,nion, any officer or director; if club. any cat
officer or director, any interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly, in any liquor establishment in the Sim
.of Mlnnesom NO . Give name and address of such establishment
14. Furnish the name and address of at least thine business references, including one hank reference:
Minnesota Clay Company
INUNI —_
N.W. Graphics Supply Co
IN.—,
Wayzata Bank 6 Trust
15. Will intoxicating liquor be sold on the premises
8001 Grand Av S, Bloomington
Innnun
4200 E, Lake, Mpls
Inrmrc\I
900 E. Wayzata B1vd,.Wayzata
enne,.,O
NO
16. fa) Stine whether application is: 1. Original X 2. Renewal _ 3. Transfer
(b) State whether dancing will be permitted on the premises NO
17. Are the premises now occupied, or to be occupied, entirely separate and exclusive from any othe
business establishment YES
18. State trade name to la used The Art Center of Minnesota
19. State whetter an "On -Sale" or "Off -Sale" Non Intoxicating Malt Beverage License hn or will be graniM it
conjunction to this business and for the same premises len
20. Hass :here been issued, or will there be issued. a 554.00 Federal Retail Liquor Dealer's Special Tax Stun;
for the sale of liquor on these premises _ un `
21. Hos your local g;;vernnitnt an ortlinanr,Yrlkulalinq i!le rcnsumpliat and display of intoxicating hmio
22. If oranwi i under romine ordinance hov, is toc.ttmn of building clessilmd
21. Has your local q:,vernrntrna an ordinance YEcgulating 1!nr consumption and display of intoxicating hquu
22. If uperwinq under mninti ordinance hove is vocation of building classified R?aiagnriwl
I herldty'edify rh.m
I Iwrr "...I and under. bard
e.6" qu.anm ni 1". ,ryphcwbgn, ..,it that it. en.w.ra Ara 11r. of my oan
Lna..Udp.
Inttlr.t un9v:mn1 that the
0•yin0 of lah. inlnlmat,on
in if.;, uP4aiulio u. or
Ihn laihu. Ie Oi.. p.rhnant inlnlrnnwn eontitwe,
cam* toe 11
immedrats mnculmn .A this parmil. IT IS FuI11nEn
UNDERSTOOD THAT
ANY PERMIT ISSUED IIEREUNDEn DOES NOT
ALLOW THi
SALE OF INTOXICATING
LIQUOR. Enclnsud is payment
of SI00.00 payable
to the liquor CorttolOu.ctor as pco.idsd by M.S.
1961, Sectrn
760.119.
NO CONSIDERATION WILL. BE GIVEN TO
THIS APPLICATION UNLESS APPROVED AS
HEREINAFTER PROVIDED:
II applicant is located in the County, the Chairman
of the Board of County Commissioners or his
Representative shall approve both copies of the
application.
Rant ul cnuny Gmnnnaamnus on hn Itq.rn+ntourwl
If applicant is located in a Municipality, the
President of life Council or his Representative shall
approve both copies of this application.
11•r..rnMr of 111. Leuw•11 11 hw IbP••n•mulire)
The Art Center of Minnesota
//INam of Enwmranm.nU
I Slpnlun of Am enraq Aoo •:ant'
Subs d and orn to before me �g td= day
of .39tSh .
F.—PIN
H 7
My Commission expires
NOTARY "IY Fill. NALLIN
C'UmU 'tly Fill. HALOTA
NENNEPIN COUNTY `
M SWOONS" slow" aiM
CITY UI ORU➢u
C1:YSTAL DAY, MINNESOTA SS323
ADMINISTRATIVE: OFFICES
Phone: 473-7358
APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGARETTES AT RETAIL 1986
(Chapter 6Z, Orono Municipal Code)
1. Nano of Applicant WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB
Address 200 WAYZATA BLVD. WAYZATA, M!, SS391 Phona 473 8846
2. Sales LOCAtion:
Newt WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB
Address 200 WAYZATA BLVD. WAYZATA, M. 55391 Phone 473 8846
3. Principal business carried on at this location
Private Club
4. Method of Salus: Vending Machine 1X Over Countar Other
I hereby wake application for license to sell cigarettes at retail at
the abova location subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and
thu ordinances of the Vilinge of Orono fiirino, Vie following qunrterly
periods:
' `Fcb-Mar-Apr LICENSE FEES
May-Junu-July Expiration date of license, Jan. 11.
each year. Annual liconsc faa is
.Aug -Sept -Oct $20.00. :there applienble, as in the
case of seasonal sales, this may be
,' Nov-Dve-Jnn pro-ratea by quarters, at $5.00 per
quarter.
Make remittance payable to City of Orono
Signature of appllcsnLL� d
.S'nT}bTtFP
Dated Al -il 15, 1986
r Offiea Ilse
Action:
APR I R ,l.YT
License N
APPLICATION FOR SOLICITA rION O.DO f7_75 Date Received
Date Expires
CITY OF ORONO
1335 BROWN ROAD SOUTH
BOX 66
pp� �n�(pCRYSST�AL BAY, MN 55323
Organization: Vim. 41Y 1�&_ Phone
Address: t ,I.y PSI&
Representative: rCC�AIiE.►.1 �. �ala<l.e C >` Phone 6c{y — I Lly
Address: ,��j 11_
Check One: Business Solicitation Contribution Solicitation
Number of People Solicitating within the City I
Provide list of Names of Solicitors on back of this application.
`
Type of Product to be solicited _L". V�.k'� NtU4A ►4y
PERMIT EXPIRES 60 DAYS FROM APPRGVAL DATE. POLICE CHIEF SHALL HAVE FIVE (5)
BUSINESS DAYS IN WHICH TO INVESTIGATE AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION PURSUANT TO ORONO
NICIPAL CODE SECTION 5.30 SUBD 5(a).
ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON SOLICITORS
Subd. 3. Prohibited Solicitation Practices. Am I n19%
A. It is unlawful for any solicitor to engage in solicitation for spy
unlawful business or organizational purpose or activity. --
B. It is unlawful for an licitor to practice harassment, nuisance,.
theft, deer 't, or menacing, trc some or otherwise unlawful actAMti}Wdyring
the course .f solicitation.
C. It is unlawful for any solicitor to enter, or attempt to gain entrance, to
residential premises displaying at such entrance a sign with the words "Peddlers
and Solicitors Prohibited" or "Solicitors Prohibited".
D. It is unlawful for any solicitor to refuse to leave business premises when
requested by the owner, leasse, or person in charge thereof.
E. It is unlawful fox Any person to engage in contribution solicitation
without completion of licensing or registration as herein provided.
F. It is unlawful for any person to engage in business solicitation without a
license as herein provided.
__________________________________________________________________________
The undersigned hereby agrees to the conditions quoted above from the Orono
Municipal Code and any additional req ements the City staff me have.
Signature of Applicant ZW\__Date101
_ �o'
TOR CITY USN ONLY: After review of application, staff recommends the ollowing:
Approval of application Denial of application
Signature of City Official:
Date:
Signature of Police Chief: Date:
__________________________________________________________________________
h.-A .If , . I,- ,A
CITY of ORONO pnlPar.N.mm+,mr::rsl SKINSTIC F:APPLI ATION:.LEIiS
LICENSE APPLICATION
O::
aUILDING A ZONING - 4737357
ASSESSING
All questions must be answered. License fee, bond, certificate
of insurance, and evidence of HPCA Certification ')rHome Sewage
Treatment Workshop attendence must accompany this application.
All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period.
1. Business or trade name r1tr N Vic ' oke
i
2. Business address l(,55/ �,qyr,> Qi06,>•- OR• + /iJ,BP �v Ao..�
3. Business phone 42 a - 37 9 3 Residence phone So Af
4. Name of applicant or companyreppresentative holding N.PCA
certification '%O M 7�.aT,S.oDr'
5. Type of certification held: Installer _ Pumper
Site evaluator System desilner
Is this a Provisional —Certificate? Certificate No.—V-3
6. If no Certificate is held, provide evidence of attendance at
one of the On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshops held immediate]
prior to the current construction season.
7. Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in
Orono before? UY_S Most recent year (y $
B. Have you ever had a license revoked? d/o When?
Where?
SUB/MITTALS REQUIRED:
I/' L. $25.00 license application fee. p 8(p
..77 2. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as-��Iqq-`�
obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted.
8� ,
3. $10-50-100,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. S- �
Z4. Copy of current MPCA Certificate or evidence of attendence N'
at On -Site Sevepe Treatment Workshop held immediately �t
prior to current construction season. J!
LICENSES WILL NOT BF PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED
List persons other than applicant who are authorire,7.�d7 yy yo- to
apply for permits under your license .$%s✓ t YA Tti erai
The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of
Orono, Minnesota, for license to install and repair septic
systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws
of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of
Date /$' Applicants Signature
CITY Staff recommendation Approval � Denial _ Date Al-2-3-8
USE Reason for denial:
ONLY City Council Action Date Approved __ Denied _
Date license mdiled
a
Par.I Ulnm 14n !�,
Mioi0110 O Cry. nl iLy,Mmwu•n:.•:t2I ;h PTIC JASTLI ATIC', LL'fiS
L/i i 1 iJj \ ll LICGIJSE A! PLCITIOt:
HVILDING A ZONING - 471-0557
ASSESSING
All questions must be answered. License fee, bond, certificate
of insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification or.Home Sewage
Treatment Workshop attendence must accompany this application.
All applications at, subject to a ten (10) day approval period.
1. Business or trade name � P� EXe,,.44 mri Alq
2. -Business address / &Y olLb2 ah)1fr6se, 01Il SS.3(c7�
3. Business phone 177,2 - 252/ Residence phone Q12 _ 3511
4. Name of applicag% or comrepresentative holding MPCA
certification /�/s.ut� &)k.- yelS
5. Type of certification held: >e Installer _ Pumper
Site evaluator System designer
Is this a Provisional —Certifi.ate? Certificate No.
6. If no Certificate is held, provide evidence of attendance at
one of the On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshops held immediate
prior to the current construction season.
7. Have you ever hell a Septic System Installer license in
Orono before? veS Most recent year /9 S.T
8. Have you ever had a license revoked? #Q When?
Where?
SUBMITTALS REQUIRED:
1. $25.00 license application fee.
2. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as
obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted.
3. $10-50-100,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance.
4. Copy of current MPCA Certificate or evidence of attendence
at On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshop held immediately
1
p prior to cu rent construction season n
A.&- .f.e.• - - GtJs.Gt'
1�
l
LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL STEMS ARE SUBN,ITTED.
List persons other than applica-t who Are authorized you to�t1,,� --
apply for permits under your license �F� ��/, 1_ & K Xt4dyf�
rn The undersigned hereby makes application to the City JJ
Orono, Minnesota, for license to install and repair septic
systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws
of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of
Orono.
Datet4-1-$% Applicants '.ignrture Lvim gm&ar
CITY Staff recommendation Approval �/� Denial Date 3-
USE Reason for denial: _ _ ___
ONLY City Council Action Ile to _ _ _ _ Approved Denied
Date license mailed
YIITY OF MONO Li c "'v:r Yr:,
P.O. Box ;e - Do:, 16-,.-;�•�,<,1��'1.b7- —
Crystal Boy, NIN 1.113)3 IV,, 1'"I�--
473-7357.�SO� Int i,il�_
GARBAGE L REFUSE COLLECTOR'S LICENSE APPLICATION
The undersigned wishes to operate the indicated business in the City of Orono and
herewith makes application for a license to do so.
Business/Firs.
Address
(Street (City) (State) (Zip Code)
Business Phone Number
's Name
Phone Number y 7 Se- .2 v -1 O
Check One: Individual Partnership Corporation
Number of Vehicles to be used in Orono
Description of Vehicles (attached list if more):
Loaded Loaded
Year Ntgr. Gross Wt. Rear Axle Wt. Size/Yards License Number
191Z t� I o r, �� Ciu
General area of City served OAo.vo OAC#h A0 A U of/) do V G tA.YL KO vU lr
AD, OAK` v, uW rcgRa rl ;)autora,r)' Hi'sL avA rWATL/1T I RL). /
Schedule of Collection charoes/ dates L 1? 7.
Approximate number of customers in Orono
Location of dumping area AUFPJL O LANn 1-z 4c f,vp 4-u✓/',5 y A49
__________________________________________________________________________
IN ORDER FOR THIS APPLICATION TO BE COMPLETE, YOU MUST ENCLOSE THE FOLLOWING:
Surety bond in the amount of $1,000. Proof of insurance in the aNOat�S of
$300,000-$300,000-$50,000, and 10-day cancellation clause. -- Annual fee is a
$30.00 flat rate fee, plus $15/truck, and a $30.00 transfer fee (if able).
---------------------------------------------- OR-$yI -----
I am the owner and operator of the above business and I have paid all license fees
PAP
taxes required by law. The above information is correct.
lYJ7�..�.... / 4� �.!' -- Date/ , / / O s�
pp cent "J%�"�`�y
-------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR CITY USE ONLYz After review of application, staff recommends:
pr 1 Denial Other (specify)
4
g ature of C y I icinl Date
16
CITY IF
EMP L- NO
OF ONO y P A Y M
Tao fG.Ciu06*Aa Bold& r_T_D . _ _
M1 AME UlO GROSS GROSS EXP/ALLOY
ANDERSON UL 31 11132.08 1227.52
BERNHAMOSO HE 12 13538.56 1692.32
BOBZIEN
SA
31
6100.34
831.49
003MA
JL
12
1098900
264.00
GRINER
CA
90
0.00
0.00
BRINKHAUS
JF
42
9910.48
1191.37
BURMASTER
YD
31
106$IuO2
1336.72
CARLSON
tlJ
92
9627.66
1180088
CHECK
JM
90
0.00
0.00
CHESYICK
53
31
10569.31
1316.56
CLARK
BP
31
6325,19
766.96
CORNICK
JL
31
6916.90
930.80
EDMUNDS
P
90
0 f0
0.00
EHRENBERG
UL
90
2665.3S
276.92
ENGLISH II
IM
31
8158.53
144.05
ERICKSON
DJ
93
56.35
56.35
ERICKSON
KR
31
11416.14
1260.52
FRITZLER
JR
31
10253.49
1294.39
SAFFRON
MP
33
0429900
1054#08
GALLO
OE
93
29.40
29.40
GERHAROSOA
JR
42
12100.08
1514.40
GREGORY
JO
♦2
8594.29
1307.04
MALLIN
DM
12
6858.40
858.32
HANSEN
SC
42
1561028
904.16
HANSING
CJ
31
2808.86
415.4L
HENNING
JP
90
0.00
0.00
HENSEL
MM
31
5893.03
788.33
M[GUS
PA
90
2645.54
291.52
JACOBS
TJ
33
8099.15
1013.60
JOHNS
RJ
90
0.00
0.00
JOHNSON
9P
31
9975.OS
1213.11
KIL80
MH
31
1340048
1544040
KIRNYCZUK
M
31
10219.62
1204938
KLAERS
A9
12
1244.35
112.00
KNUTSON
CA
15
5807.50
726.80
KRIMMEL
OL
93
0.00
0.00
KRUEGER
JA
90
348.75
81.00
KUF.MN
TR
15
11186.03
1399.92
LATIIN
JC
15
6858.41
858.32
MAJUSTM
JA
33
10249.53
1282.72
MANUEL
CM
90
1590.40
162.40
MCGOVAN
LR
90
8412.16
1051652
RJROYCZYNS
J
31
12149.91
1418.56
RROSS
FT
61
6603.73
781.60
NAA6
TL
12
39T8.22
O.DO
OAS
UO
93
1239.00
1239.00
OMAN
LE
33
3165.26
655.20
PALMER
31
0.00
0.00
PETERS"
PL
12
3643.04
535. 68
P ",TLRSON
RY
91
0.00
0.00
PRU90
4J
17
0.00
0.00
m►rnNG
ApR a a 1986
CITY OF MONO
CITY OF ORON9 P A Y R
c:MPL-NO
Y-T-0 • - - - - - -
NAME
DIO
GROSS
GROSS EKP/ALLOY
QUASI
VA
92
8095.4S
954.88
ROLF
DJ
90
407.25
0.00
ROYCRAFT
BE
93
0.00
0.00
SASS
11
42
7141.74
904.16
SELLNER
CL
93
0.00
0.00
SELSTAO
ER
93
0.00
0.00
SIEVERS
RC
90
510.00
12GoOO
SKREEN
05
42
1120.50
907.21
SLIGO
SR
9Y
44.00
44.00
SMITH
JR
92
7779.70
860.11
STEFFENHAG
RE
93
8079997
1011.20
STEVENS
BG
93
169.10
169.10
TMIES
RR
90
1107950
1S5.00
THONTON
MR
31
4950.83
188.33
TOMCHECK
LF
31
788.33
788033
TOMCZVK
MV
31
10673.40
1204.08
VOYTCRE
SM
31
r l0
0.00
COUNT GMANC 44r6B0.62 5
PALU 00053
TOTAL 30066 TCTAL
TOTAL FICA TAR GROSS = 229091.63 EMPLOYERS FICA
A v GRCUP HEALTH
6 e PHYSICIAMOS HEALTH PLAN
C n BLOC CROSS/BLUE SHIELD
0 = MEDICAL CENTER PLAN
E PAUOE)TIAL
F e COORO. HEALTH CARE
G = MINNESOTA HMO
M = TRANS-AMERICA OCC.
I = BANKERS LIFE
J TU4L SERVICES
K JUAL 9F DRAMA
L = EMPLOYEES BENEFIT
M AETNA
M o NICILLLT LITEL
0 = LFAGUL OF CITIES
I = HLALTP CARC MAtNT ACCT.
'
1484, CITY
Of 3RoNo
CHECK 4tSI'sTER
84-24-06 PACE
r
CHECK N1.
7ATE
A"OUNT
/tYDOR
ITEM OESCRIP110N
ACCOUNT NO. I%V.
O P.O. 0 NEiSAGi
(
1193'•l
04/25/86
1J.)0
A-1 MINNE I]NK& iitNT
E.OUI► RENTAL
C1-45.1-099-11
1a.�o •
11600�.
30/25/86
116.10-
♦Coto-wifthESOTA INC
hLDi/6RJS »NT
c1-4231-099-1/
11900%
04/23/86
116.00
CRO-MINKS06A INC
1+LD$fS*!)S NM1
01-4231-099-11
11331)a�
04/23/86
114.18
ACRO-MINgLSOTw INC
SLOG/GADS MAT SUP
01-42•.1-09l-11
116.3G •
......
•.•-Cot"
(
118u7-
06/23/86
40.00
83NESTR00 ROSENE ASN
ENG k TAINER
31-4394-a00-41
118014
.C4/23/96
67.59
83MESTROC ROK K ASN
EwF CUM ULT
01-4305-141-42
1180/4
04/25/46
315.00
eONESTROC ROSENE ASN
L34R RfIAA• 12
C1-4335-2'J9-7i
118U'4
J4/23186
90.00
bUkESTROC ROSENE ASO
EK CONSULT
01-4155-840-11
118,14
04/23/86
327.00
hOMESIROO AOSENE ASN
ENO CONSULT
45-4105-432-00
116114
04/23/86
326.10
SOME°TROD ROSEME ASN
GENERATOR
13-4305-569-92
113311
C4123186
562.50
t§O%ESTROC ROSENE ASN
ENG CONSULT
IS-•3C5-%9-92
1.726.10 •
11SC 4.
C4/23/66
446.40
t$YJW; OOWPROMASTLR
PAD SHOP AE,ALt
I4-4001-59 4
(
446.40 •
c
1t41u0
5146
444.12
CASE PDT. A EbUIP
E4ulP/DIS/ACCcSS
OT-42_2-249-4a
444.72 •
t
l
1131.'i
04lt3/86
636.33
CJNCcP[ MICROFILM
OfH A CONSULT
31-4336-129-31
636.33 •
1131 SO
C4/23146
13U.41
CJLG4IAL LIFO INS =7
H!'ALld INS
01-41•_1-121-]1
118137
04/23/86
11.03
CJLONIAL LIFE :NS :3
HEALTH INS
01-41`_1-126-31
119130
04/23/46
:4.00
CILONIAL LIFE 1KS :J
MrALTH INS
01-41!1-129-31
192.'EC •
E
118131
04/23/Be
S81.IC
C..NM_Rtl►L BIOE RNT
JANITORIAL :�Rv
G1-434.-099-I1
119151
04/23/86
223.50
C014MERCIAL BLD6 MN1
JANITORIAL
01-4349-129-SI
�
61i.30 •
t
11S119
00/21/96
6.25
COMMERCIAL EMBLEM
r_ARI9G 4PP
01-4221-129-31
6.25 •
*600*6
111141
04/23/86
/�.9..9
COPY OUP PA 11oC
05F !JPPLIE,
01-44t0-129-31
If3o CITY
Ot ORONO
CK(CK
RL#.ISttR
0
LH'CK 40.
DATE
AMOUMT
VENDOR
ITEM 7CSCAIPTtON
•
186.09 •
119143
C4/23/66
3.30
COMMERCIAL LIFE
I
LIFE INS
•
118143
C412-VOS
2.10
COMMERCIAL LIFE
INS
LIFE INS
118143
04/23/86
21.J3
COMMERCIAL LIFE.
IMS
LI%E INS
118143
04/23/66
3.60
COMMERCIAL LIFE
INS
LIFE INS
•
118143
04/23/86
22.55
CUPPERCIAL LIFE
IN:,
LIFE INS
I19143
04/23/86
3.60
COMMERCIAL L:'E
?Ni
LIFL INS
118143
04/23/66
21.60
COMMERCIAL LIFE
INS
LIFE INS
•
118143
04/23/46
15.60
COMMERCIAL LIFE
INS
LIFE INS
118143
04/23/64
9.00
COMMERCIAL LlrE
INS
LIFE INS
119143
041231146
3.40
COMMERCIAL LIFE
tN5
LIFE INS
•
118143
0%123186
%.t,O
COMMERCIAL. LIFE
I%S
LIFE INS
liei43
•34/23/86
9.%0
COMMERCIAL LIFE
INS
LIFE INS
116143
04/23/86
.1c
COMMERCIAL LIFE
INS
LIFE INS
•
118143
04/23/86
3.50
C3KRERCIAL LIFE
INi
tIFE INS
118143
C4/23/86
34.11
COMMERCIAL LIFE
INS
LIFE INS
116143
04/23/86
1.08
COMMERCIAL LIFE
INS
LIFE INS
•
119143
04/23/06
4.92
COMMERCIAL LIFE
INS
LIFE INS
116143
04/23/66
7.38
COMMERCIAL LIFE
INS
LIF: INS
119143
04/23/86
1.62
C1MNEACIAL LIFE
I16S
LIFE INS
118143
;,4123/86
.40
CJMNErtCIAL LIFE
TYi
LIF= INS
178.59 •
1141�5
04/23/66
3.U0
C ORNI CK /JARE S
FUELS1LUSES
11e145
04/23/86
51.61
CORNICK/JA4ES
CONF/SCHOOLS
1t914a
OV23/86
3S.26
CORNICK/JAM£S
MILEAGE
IS.B7 •
Al
*105 *0
•
:*10%
04/23/86
20.0%0
CULLt6AN
MMT OL061GRGS
20.40
tlBl'19
J4/_3/Ac
39434.00
••ok-F E ERI:KSON
ASSE.S5IN6 SERV
39434.00 •
lie so
0412:
IT.135
GLENeJ70 INGLEYOu::
UTILITIES
77.M5 •
1162ui
04/23/86
15..
GOUT TRAININb SERF
CONF/SC43OLS
35.
f
s... •
113271
04/23/86
69.85
PLO LTk KALTH
CARE
NEALMT INS
lt8277
04/23/86
69.95
MEJ :TR NLALTM
CARE
MEALTM INS
64-20-64 .A"
ACCOUNT 60. INU. • 0.0. a "T.4SA3.E
Ot-41!2-039-12
C1-41`_2-069-I9
91-4 V2-121-31
01-41!2-121-31
01-4112-126-31
01-41`_2-129-31
't-41`-2-129-31
01-4112-114-33
01-4152-249-62
01-4152-249-42
01-4152-290-61
11-4152-SiS-90
71-4TS2-SlS-90
72- 4152-54l-l1
�l-4152-54l-91
'I-5AMli
II �-Ssl-y2
14 172-590-13
01-0270-129-11
01-4356-12l-31
01-4301-12S-31
11-4343-SIS-90
01-430T-059-l4
01-4]24-9"-11
;1-6356-039-11
?1-il`1-OS1-:2
;;t-�t51-08l-1S
..•-CK.
...-CK
Il96 CITY
Of )RJNO
C44CCA A%6ISTER
CA-i4-46 P96t
_11-p. NO.
DATE.
Ah8uN1
9LNOGA
ITEM 3ES:.-tIPfIOA1
/CCOU'41 kJ. INV.
0 P.u. A pt:,:"t
w
11g7'1
06/23/86
CTR 04E4LIH CARL
HEALTH I%S
01-4131-121-31
118211
04123/86
69.35
RED Li9 ME►LTH CAME
HEALIN INS
/1-A1•_1-126-31
118171
04123/8t6
150.119
RE CTR Mt.1 TM CARE
HEALWO INS
at- ♦151-1Fh-33
118211
04/23/46
301.118
RE0 -^TR NEALTN :ARE
I/EALT" INS
01-4151-249-41
118211
04/25/86
67.45
ME CTR K AL In CARL
NEALIM 143
il-Alll-SiS-90
116211
0#424186
60.39
ME CIR PEALTH CARL
W•-eN INS
12-4151-549-11
s
1102f7
04/23186
90.60
PIED :TR "EALTH CARE
wti:TM INS
13-4151-S69-92
v53.71
11829i
00/23146
MILE"E
01-4'E1-039-12
118241
OV23186
4.'0
HALLIN/DOROTHT
RILEASE
01-4381-844-13
1G.^5 •
i192t3
04/23/96
10.07
+tiNN CTT KECOR)S
OTHER CONSULT
SI-4306-d40-11
No
10.00 .
•
11333C
]4123146
71.42
ICNA A;TRR+1T CORP
1CAA 3/24 TC 4iw/9L
?1-♦110-G39-1?
11.92 •
•
•
110346
04121/86
288.00
I%TL CITY 460%1 A`.SN
aDOKS/aERSO=i _:
:1-4240-C39-12
286.00 •
119310
C4/2S/86
160.11
JIR HATCH SALES CO
E '.iP/: •'- ACC=S1
:1-4"!2-17•-3•
�
160.11 •
ew
118316
04/23/86
73.14
JOHNSON PAPER C7
STORE 00 4UP
71-4230-51S-9
13.1A •
•
110381
06/23/86
97.44
K A K RENTALS
JTILItIES RAN
11-4324-SI5-19
11113sl
04/23/66
1.250.00
K L K RENTALS
STORE RENT
11-4132-SIS-9u
1.347.4♦ •
•
118389
04/23/66
15.00
KIVNTCZUK/RICHAEL
CONf/SCHOALS
31-43 6-129-31
1S.J0 •
119494
04/23/46
S6.7S
THE LAKER
PRISIPO±L
11-4322-020-11
116464
04/23/86
62.50
THE LAKEN
4Ol1ERTTiS1106
Il-•323-31S-1T:
'
144% CITT
Of uRpr1
CdTC% NO.
PATE
f
f
119411
04/23/86
11SA37
0%12 Vmt
110�56
C4/23/86
•
•
1194a1
0411S/8f
•
•
ill�1•
,4123/9t
119f9 •
44/23/96
O0•
.11490
C14/23/86
•
11S699
04/23/86
116512
04/23/06
ItS512
04/23/96
119522
04/23/86
1t6536
06/23/OE
f
THECR RLGISIER
AMOUNT
YEIROM
ITEM OtSCRIPTION
119.15
124.30
LA401CAPF 0 TURF
0LDUSAUS NOT SVP
124.00 •
7.056.10
C 1 T T Of LONG LAKE
OFF REut
2.056.90 •
10.is
RABUSt+1-J=ArMC
COIrF/SCdiO►S
10.75 •
1•J78.91
MA4T[MS RAYARNE o6
R01T AUT"
1•J19.+1 •
1••SI2.ly
M4TR) MA51' COMTROt.
RUC: -MAY
1�•312.1A •
3.j1
M'LS ORTG`_R CO
MwT Otis: EQUIP
i.S1 •
445.16
OtIAWECASC�
uT1CITIC�
•�5.16 •
35.00
"INN C1TT RGRI A�ih
K MOERSNIP
35.00 •
3S.00
R'PEL.RA-YERTS
CV%F/SCwOGLS
$5.00
MPELRA-UERTS
REM0IERSMI►
120.30 •
62.60
Wit +LIST CO
EGNIP/PTS/ACCESS
62.60 •
160.04
NOTOROILA INC
041 RISC ESMIP
04-78-06
iAGt
ACCOUNT N0. low. 0 P.O. 1
"ti.iAG'
10-4231-590-93
01-4332-129-31
...-Co .
R1-4356-174-33
01-6341-121�-31
•••-ta�
T-1 10 2-Ofl01-i3i;
01-4162-1i9-31
C1-•!2h041-i
**-co
01-0356-129-31
01-4 309-1241-31
•�•-Cn;
16- 02 32-900-l3
•!l�CRS
01•♦ 3a2-12MS3
1fr. CITT
of 0401RIi
CHEEK
sit o1STIR
84--114-M PAbf
�J_-IL %3.
J41L
AMOUMI
wf N004
12C4 JESCRIPIIOM
ACCOURT %0. IhY.
a ✓.w. x Nt
114JJ4
14/23/8f.
413.7I5
M013RJLA
INC
"%I RIS1 EQUIP
01-�7�Y-2�9-t•Y
I1dS34
041231AF
188.55
0013ROLA
IMC
*NT RISC EQUIP
1Y-0'0?-59'F-91
119-33•
04/'3196
142.44
MOTO401A
IMC
OUT RISC E"IP
13-4342-%69-9s
1.166.J/ •
It 53h
04.423186
2.11
CITY OF
ORONO
OFF SW
01-0218-1/4-33
1185314
C4123/86
11.06
CITY OF
ON3NO
BLOG4940S/R41
SUP
01-4231-099-1/
118554
C6/1 $186
15.44
CITY OF
ORONO
POSTAGE
OI-4231-129- 31
119536
04/23/86
.59
CITY air
CRONO
EOYIP/PTS/ACCESS
01-42`2-249-62
11S5so,
04/21/66
10.13
CITY 4w
04040
POSTAGE
61-4321-174-33
11853,
04/23/64
0.00
CITY OF
CRONG
MILEAGE
CI-03l/-1?9-31
118S36
04/21/66
1.10
CITY OF
"ONO
MILEAGE
81-4381-249-42
11953•,
04/25/06
32.40
CITY OF
CRONu
14EETI"
01-4782-114-33
I953b
04/231R6
8.00
CITY OF
ORONu
LICENSE
81-♦303-129-31
91.63 •
••.••.
•••-CR>
1195t) 4
04/2 V 86
867.51
NaP
$1 LIVES
C1-0325-209-42
11S:i54
04/23/Rt
17h.33
NSP
UTILITI S
13-0324-!1069- 92
1.360.10
.••..•
.••-Cx,
1135?4
04/23/86
102.00
OFFICE
P#W OF ON
0,11T OFF EQUIP
01-4'40-039-12
119579
1.4/23/66
102.00
OFFICE
►003 OF "M
M%T OFF L3UIP
01-0`40-174-33
204.00 •
•.....
..._y,
118`,17
04/23/8E
56.59
PUBLIC
ERPL MET
ASSN
PERA 5124 TO
1 6/3o
.:1-4141-639-12
114i91
041231est
4.21
PUBLIC
ERPL NET
ASSN
P_RA 3/2• TO
4/6/40
01-4141-000-13
118547
U4/23/86
9F.61
PUBLIC
ERPL MET
ASS*
P;_RA 3/24 14)
4/c/46
C1-4141-069-15
116597
0112318E
14.23
PUBLIC
ERPL RE
ASSN
PER& 3020 TO
416146
d1-0101-099-1/
118311
04/23/8E
19074.C1
PUBLIC
EPPL CET
ASSN
PENA 3/24 TO
4/6/66
81-4141-111-31
113591
04/23/8t
46.68
PUBLIC
ERPL MET
ASSN
PERA 3/24 TO
4/r/66
01-4141-115-31
11859/
U6/2318!
605.99
PV%LIC
ERVL NET
ASSN
PERA 3/24 TO
416/64
81-4141-121-31
115591
C4/23/BE
064.x2
PUBLIC
ERPL AET
ASSN
PERA 3124 TO
4/4146
01-4141-126-31
118547
34/23/8t
179.40
PUBLIC
EPPL ME
ASSN
FERA 3124 TO
4/6/86
C1-4141-114-33
1i8597
04/23/86
221.31
PUBLIC
£RrL RE
ASSN
PERA 3124 TQ
4/6/86
01-4141-249-02
118$97
:14/23/86
16.94
PUBLIC
ENPL NET
ASSN
PERA 3124 TO
416186
01-0141-290-61
116597
04/23/8F
6.13
PUBLIC
ENK MET
ASSN
PERA 3/24 TO
4/6/86
41-4141-448E-80
118597
04/23/9E
140.22
PUBLIC
EMPL NET
ASSN
PENA 3124 TQ
416146
11-4141-S1S-98
116547
04/23/84
114.10
PUKIC
EOPL MET
ASSN
PERA 3120 TO
416146
12-0141-S49-91
11851F
04/23/ee
136.99
PUBLIC
EPPL SET
ASS*
PENA V 24 TO
416164
13-4141-S69-92
110u ►7
04/23/04
57.14
PVOLIC
EML ME
ASS%
PENA 5124 TO
4/',AR
10-0141-S"-93
5.245.73 •
1LS5y4
04/23/86
9.U0
PERA INS
LIFE INS
01-0/S2-St9-31
9.00 •
1169631
04/23/66
15.00
POLICE
RARASMAAI
ASSN
BOOS/►ERIOOCLS
01-4246-129-31
t+9e CITY
OF JRONJ
f
NO
:iA I t'
f
E
119b�,0
04/23/+Ib
`
110690
04/23/85
1 t i 71 2
.06/2 3/8A
114712
04123/86
11,1112
04/23/86
l l i T12
04/23/66
S
11ir1Z
U6/23/06
110112
04/23/66
i18112
04/23/86
113 r12
04/23/86
114111
06/23196
IIA712
04/23/46
119712
04/23/66
llirl2
04123/eE
r
119150
04/23/6b
113719
0412318E
1187r9
1159CO
04/23/9E
1/8401
0A,/2 3/ Ho
118402
C4125191:
119',13
! •/25/86
11;�91_4
04/23/45
AROJNT
15.00 •
9T.S0 •
IS5.90
155.50 •
�J.69
166.65
16. r 1
$9.14
309.02
377.49
61.00
S2.LS
60.50
121.54
64.11
10ST9.53 •
983.50
483.50 •
3.400.C1
1b�. t
59.0 0
39.CI •
15.710
15.C3
157.°0
152.30 •
11.29
11.29 •
696.00
S96.00 •
CHLCK RlGISTEt
YLtiJC4 iT£R OESCRIV110%
04LI4 REDLaENMINr MIT BLD6/id1C;
SHOR_YOOC 31L 4UTINER NNT BLD216RCS
O.O.:.R.S.S.RET DIV
O.O.E.R.S.S.RET OIY
O.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIY
U.O.E.R.S.S.RE► DIY
D.J.E.R.S.S.RET DIY
O.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV
O."E.R.S.S.RET DIY
O.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV
0.0.E.R.SoSoREI DIV
0.0.E.R.S.S.RET OI11
O.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV
94-10-06 PA6L
Acr0v%7 N0. INY. a P.O. a PCs, Air
14- 414 3- 590- 43
01-4 343-099-. T
FICA
4/T
TJ
♦/2i/46
:1-a142-039-i2
FICA
411
TO
4/20/446
a1-4142-040-13
FICA
4/7
10
4129/66
01-4142-069-15
FICA
4/1
10
4120166
01-4142-099-11
FICA
4/7
TO
4126166
01-4142-115-31
FICA
411
10
4/20166
01-4142-114-33
FICA
41-
TO
4/24/Ab
c1-4142-249-42
FICA
4
4/20/du
u1-4162-l90-61
FICA
4..
-
4' ld6
11-4142-1515-Jf
FICA
4It
*0
4044/!6
12-4142-549-11
FICA
417
TO
4/20146
73-4142-:6' -92
FICA
4/7
TO
4/20/4+.
74-41A?-�90-33
,a COMNUhITT StR410E
743 2TR SUtl CORN
01-•3R5-1C0-21
TRACT OIL CO
GASOLINE
v-1260-000-QO
TiACT OIL CO
FJELS/LJdES
14-4229-590-93
BUTC4 ERICASON
CONC RESALE
r4-a0C2-S91-y4
ASHRAE MR COOT
CONF SC413OLS
01-4356-114-33
DATA 3
TELEPHONE
C1-4329-1.:9-=1
C&CELO SARERT
IRIS E:v£MSf
cl- -129-31
FISCO
£0J1P/PTS/ACCESS
01-423i-115-34
1+56 : l T f
Os ONG%:)
r
C19-CK NO.
)ATE
W►
1189:}S
J4123/66
•
11�90e
��/23/Rb
•
•
1189'f i
04l2!/�S6
`
118910
0♦/2S/8t
�
1i99i1
C4/23/yc
`
/1391?
'J6J?S/8E
to
ligil3
C4/:3/Rf
•
118i1•
04/23/86
11391-)
L4123/A6
119910
;4/23/66
NCIII
:)a/2 :/db
•
NC170h
0412318E
04Z1108
04123/8E
NCII0tj
J4/23/86
MCI 739
34/23166
MCI108
04/23/46
NC1739
04/23/At
IM'1709
04/23/46
NC1709
04.12318E
r
NC7717
04/23/86
14C7110
04/23/86
rIC7I30
34/23/86
NC1110
04/23/06
S
tic 171a
04123186
4MOJNT
5►5.00
ST5.�0 •
6.93
B.RS .
14.50
14.50 •
so.JO
SC.1a -
43.00
40.,37 •
32.50
32.`,0 •
11K.00
178.00
404.44
400.00 •
120.CL
1?3.: 0 •
163.03
160.30 •
44D.LO
•40.00 •
1.071.10
21.`6-
416.58
9.33-
16.65
19482.42 •
19632.14
32.66-
41.40
1s641.49 -
845.30
11.45-
466.i4
9.67-
1T.35
CNLC� Ht 41':1e R
IT_NDOt ITEM 7ESCRIPTIO%
GRL" FUW4 COOERI%G SL0G/:.FQUCIU4f S
NH REALTY 093 OVER PINT
NN SAFETY :O'YMCIL
STtPNEN KATAKOIEN
J.N MERTES
WELL
C�.OJO J"IY
Till K SPON1S
ST Or 04
%ILTLER RUN01Sd
POSTMASTER
E3 PHILLIPS
ED P41LLIPS
EO PdILLIPS
EO PHILLIP;
EO PdILLIPS
OJALITY PINE
QUALITY PIKE
QUALITY VINE
EAGLE DIST
EAGLE OIST
EAGLE DIST
EAGLE DIST
EAGLE 31SY
CONi/SCN001
K 61 U #BE*
MERTES 984
NN/ 8LOSICROS
CO%F/SCH00LS
OFNER EOY►P
LICENSE
FREE 71SP CH" S
POSTAGE
L10 PJRCN
L19 DISC
WINE ►0 CM
WINE DISC
BCER PJRCw
Lit PJR:d
Lit DISC
w1R PORCH
Lit PJR:"
Lis DISC
WINE PJRCN
VINE O15C
RI[ PJR:M
04-76-44 PAGE a
•CCOL4IT NJ. iNY. • P.C. • PES�.AGe
Si--SlE-129-51
t4- 121l-600-OB
01-t7_b-L29-S1
fil-? `30-OOi-Gt:
Ol- ,_43-C99-►I
0►-4596-129-51
O►-4SA0-590-93
O1-,!l3-121-31
"►-4591-241-,2
F1-4l30-S1♦-95
�AAFts,
71-♦l11-51�-95
N►M�s;
Tl-,I112-514-95
�.Nr.i:
71-,1t3-519-94
Oka No, AL
11-40►0-l1♦-9i
MANUAL
0-95
NAND AL
II-•;p20-514-9`.:
N&NUAL
TI-4•Ia-S►A-95
MANNA
II-,l11-S1h9S
RARLiAL
71-,01?-s14-9'1
14RIN:.L
71-4113-iTN9S
R1ANbA�
71-4�f20-S14-9]
I►RN1;A1
139.. CITY Of RONO
Ir
Ctl_CA 143. JAIE
H;,1111
H:1711
r4C1112
'IcI!13
OCT 713
HC 1 11 3
•i:T71 S
•
• H:1715
Mc1715
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
C•/23/A6
0•/23/RE
0•/23186
J•/23/8E
0%123/8A
a•/23/8t
0•/23/8E
.04123/86
L•/23/86
U4/23/86
AMJ4Ni
1.3.1.41 •
553.15
11.01-
S•2.08 •
120.5•
1.10-
119.15 .
b35.20
1?C.50
2.41-
J.D.S9 •
7.00
21450.00
2►•37.;0 •
259239.i3
6.7}
8.b'.
327.02
10.102.04
569. 4 4
159902.08
19272.25
53,228.3E
CHECK RLGI:iTrR
V..NDOR ITEM XSCRIP110N
c❑ PAILLI�'i
E J P41LL IP,
JOHNSUN PROS
J04NSON ells
OJAl1IY NINE
QUALITY NINE
QUALITY bl%E
OUALIII NIVIE
COMM R_V SALES ►Alt
rOMN Ri V SALES TALI
FUND 01 TOTAL
FUND 41 TOTAL
FUND •♦ TOTAL
FUND •` TOTAL
FUNU 11 TOTAL
FUND 12 TOTAL
FJNU 13 TOTAL
FJ10 14 TOTAL
TOTAL
tNE Pu�c«
TNT PORCM
II1ME OUR C"
MINE 11 C
Lla 0JR�-ri
LIN 01SCAt
WINE PJRCH
WINE DISC
SALES T44 HAREM
SALES TAAI RARCN
GEItERAL FJNJ
PERK IMPROVE REVOLVING F
1962 SPEC AS ,_SSIIERT FUA
1985 S2EC ASSESSM XT Fus
C10JOR 3PERATING FUND
HATER OPERATING FJN::
SEVER OPERATING FUND
GOLF COUASE OPERATING FC
04-26-84 NA6E
ACCOUNT NO. law. 0 P.O. a N[SSAG1.
11- b@12-51•-95
lf-♦013-514-9S
11-se12-51•-9s
T1-•et!-91•-9S
II-•010-514-9L
11-•tl/l-Slh9�
it-•R12-SI•-9S
71-4813-514-9'S
Ot-1)00-ti00-J,,
11-:22:-oea-cE
Haiku Ai
RiIU +l
NAftAL
RANI; A i
to A AWu A L
MAN.; AL
mgmu A,
MANUAL
PUBLIC ATTENDANCE
l
CITY OF ORONO
MEETING DATE
PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS.
NAME OR NUMBER
NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda)
3.
6.X4.
7. r,, ej b J,C b o IV
1c, I/T 0 A K�.✓
8.0
a T
9 2!� �✓.�� G u 5 -A
9054,
0
1 i<< r t
o r ,!i oAr
A IL 6-Xg
5 . w
�► S
6. 2SorJ
1625 rDX
.7.
l8.
l9.
>0.
orl
IE +e,.o nn s
ne't
ob
I
P.pP, z a
ot C1 i f 3F t",NAN0
CATY of ORONO
Punt Office jN�x fib aCrystal flay, Minnesota V,32:J•Municiptl ()ffiew
On the North .Shure of Lake Minnetonka
April 25, _986
Clinton M. Gables
American Builders 6 Assoc.
3600 Shoreline Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
Dear Mr Gables:
This letter is written in response to your complaint letter
. -;arch 25, 1986.
It is unfortunate that the intent of my visit. to your office
on March 13, 1986 has been completely misunderstood. I was
responding to a complaint of a resident regarding unfinished work
and discrepances in construction valuation cn your building
permit.
An inspection at the site on March 13,1986 revealed that
there were several code violations involving the new construction
under your jurisdiction.
Mr. Zimmerman continued to ask why the valuation on the
permit was so low when he had paid a great deal more. At that
point. it. became imperative that I meet with you to discuss these
matters.
When I reached what I assumed was your office, y assistant.
and 1. waited for an indefinite period of time in w' we learned
later was an attorney's office and not a reception area. Mr
Zimmerman then arrived and explained that your office was
adjacent and to the rear. You must understand that the last time
was upstairs, it was a dentist's office ^nd I was uitaware of
y change to this office area.
In fact if you remember, Mr. Gables you motioned for me and
my assista it to come into your office. You failed to advise us
that the woman sitting in your office was a client and not your
secretary.
Our current. records still show that you have not upgraded
your permit nor, called for the inspections to assure that the
safety and welfare of your client has been secured by you.
81 It INN/. & If1N11Y4: 471 7I37 • ADMINISTRATION • f 411 'IiA • Pt It( 1( wf)*KS 473-71IS1
AStif SSir(,
Page 2 of 2
Once again, I apologize both for myself and my assistant if
our visit to you office created any bad feelings.
Me would appreciate yovir scheduling an inspection as soon as
possible to resolve this er,,,re matter.
Sincerly,
c7t; .w
Thowao Jacob
building Official
Mr. Thor-ias Jacobs
Mr. Lyle Omen
Citv of Orono Building Inspector
and Assistsant Building Inspector
P.O. Box 66
Crystal bay, Minresota 55�23
Re: Robert Zimmerman Re.- .dence
March 25, 19� 6
MAR 2 7 rrt�
The purpose of this letter is to formally complain as to
the unprofessional conduct which 1 experienced in my office at
ayzata by the two of you on Thursday, March 13, i9bb. As you
may recall, the door of my office was closed and I was in the
mido.— of a conference with a client when suddenly, and without
not _e the two of you and Mr. Zimmerman came rushin5 into the
roo.., and began accusing me of various allegations in a
boisterous and unprofessional manner.
I consider myself to be above board in both my business
and professional life and resent the allegations that 1 had not
come and in and updated Permits. 1.t would ha -,= been
impossible tr ,P .ome in an,-! updated the City on the riu-nerous
occasions wh- Mr. Zimmermani has made changes and has added
extra after exLra. I have always paid my fair share and fully
intende:i to infoLm the Zity upon completion of the proje,:t, as
it would have required final inspection by the - t.%, anyway.
I cannot believe that the conduct whi_ cperien---ed in
my office is normal proced,,r- and I feel an logy is
d•ie and owing. This type of shabby tre, -,,ent y Lity
Officials is inexcusable and I believe a reprimand is in order.
My livli.hood depends cn cooperation with City Building
Inspecto•s and to be accused of not complying with the rules
and r_gu_atio,-:s of the City is unjust, and 1 would be cutting
my )wn throat in the long run. I have always abided by the
Cooe or better ire all areas and will continue to do so at all
cos'. It is imperative in my way o` thinking that a good
rPonship be maintained in order t ..st •ir. the reputation
wh 1 feel I have -,corked so hard to p ve in the Lake
Mire onka area.
Sincerely, _
CMG; 1;, Clinto„ M. G,Rbles, President
NMERICAN BUILDt.R-S AND ASSOC.,
_ 14C. , OF 1-AKE MINNETONK 1
cc: : ity of OronoAdmL: :;t razor
�iavor anal i ty Counci 1 `lem1)er;,/
.'PRIL 7, 1986
' .E 51 NUMBER 13
r World Inside
• iwurance for seat belt
ors- I'ageI
9 I:rst Quarter earnings to de-
(-;ine -- Page I
• Female and Black managers
snrve%ed -- Page I
• 1N-•.1)sponsors Indoor Clean Air
/'age 3
saves
Vendor program
MAvD
In an effort to cut costs and add
value, Military Avionics Division
(MAvD) has improved its suppiv
quality and trimmed component
inspection expenses shanks it) a
unique partnership with some of
its vendors.
The division, which holds
hundreds of contracts for flight
systems, test systems and logis-
tics. inertial instruments and
guidance and navigation systems
with the Department of Defense,
has seen defect rates of incoming;
supplies substantially decrease
since MAvD-certified vendor re
pr- - atatives have start( a mak-
1, )ecific inspection!- )efore
det, very.
During the last two years.
MAvD has developed certified
vendor representative programs
with 14 of its vendors. These
vendors have each selected a
representative who is responsi-
ble fe ertifying to Honevwell
that ►f the parts in a lot
mat - 4elivery are error-
f ree shipment: Mere
vend(,. <pected to join the
prograt,• . future.
Results ie program have
been easily measurable. One of
the earliest of the division's certi-
fied vendors, a bellows manufac-
turer, had a !ot } field of 61 percent
at the start of the program. line
months !ater, the vendor's lot
yield was up to 100 percent -- a
perfect zero -defect rate. The pro-
gram saved MAvD $8.000 in in-
spection costs the first year on
pans (Moto that vendor.
SOW Pbbja, lead en&w for
MAvD's procured material im-
provement process• estimates
that $166.000 per year is now
saved in inspection costs through
the program. The average certi-
fied vendor represents $10,000 in
saved inspection costs for the
division.
MAvD did not design the pro-
gram simply to save money. The
certified vendor representative
money
Process is a major element of the
divisions vendor communica.
tions program which targets
vendors for long-time commit-
ment to a partnership of quality.
Toda),, 80 percent of MAvD's
base of 1.200 vendors produce
supplies with a perfect 100 per-
cent lot yield. MAvD continues to
work with the remainuer to im-
to next page
Nominations for
leaders sought
The ;ioneywcii Women sCoun-
cil iHW(,) is seeking nominations
of Honeywell worn— to be hon-
ored at the 1996 YWCA leader
Lunch, which will he held June 18
The Lcader Lunch recognizes
women for their demonstrated
le.idership.thility. evidenc'eof
overcoming societal and profes-
sional barriers for women; invol-
vement in community activities;
demonstrated commitment to
the elimination of discrimination
and/or to helping; Women wiihin
their own or other fields.
One of the 1985 honorees who fit
the criteria is 41ary Butter. She,
along with 17 other Honeywell
women. attended the YWCA Lead-
er I.unch last vear. "1 was
thrilled to be there, and awed and
impressed by the others who
were also being honored.'' she
said recently.
Butler. who works is a secre-
tary in the Aer—autical Engi-
neering d'part ... ent at Defense
wstems 'part
Fdina loca-
tion• has been with Honeywell
since• 19M. Outside her paid pro-
fession, Butler has been active in
politics and is currently complet-
ing her second term as Mayor of
Orono, a village of 8.000 people.
just west of Wayzata.
"I am the town's first woman
to next page
Ed Spence., loneyvseft's Chairman of the Board, met his rr.ayor Mary
Butler, at a recent reception held to recognize Honeyvreiters who have
e. -ted and'o- .ppointed pohl;cal positions. Butter, a se: rear y
Defense Syste;tis Division, (seer leader art,cte at lee!) is maycr c,. C
MN -
EMPLOYES HONORED
Public positions importan- t
lioneyweller, wlth elt•r;ee!
and/or appoiwtPd polint al ix,,: -
[ions were guests of honor it a
rer-ent reception hotted by Corpo
rate C;overnmeiii Relatiuris.
Employes with elective public
ppciisitions include a statt' senatoi.
loe•al mayors, loc-il g(,ve•rnme-nt
council members and school
board members Appointed pose
Lions range from a membership
on the Metropolitan Airports
Commission to local Parks and
Recreation %m matims am.
Ed Spencer, H, i.ey »ell's
Chairman of the Board, spoke to
IN guests. thanking them for the
skills, talents and time thev share
in the community.
"We are appreciative of the
energy and expertise each of you
provide in helping; others and in
making Honeywell. your com-
munities, Minnesota and the na-
tion a better place to lire and
work.'.
PIIII". Van ('arM% ( tu: iuirate
minne-sot.. )Service. Eripim
crs Corr ire .art t unnink-
h:,nn. ( orj,,)r ite. Cry staff ( : ,.i tier
%11 t• CUmmis..tor ;in(i .`.if'tr.?
'X isle• Control ( emm•• •inns
Rt Pehn, DSD Rn, rd
Scht, board Vistric! 8_ e•.:!
iff-nr. pin Court i Soh(i d' :
Adviscuy CommitIrr..lr,hn 1h
ing. Uniferseas aysirms lt,
is:em, Voyager i'ri'..eje W'I Board
of ihrectorssnd?reawrer- Jana
R. Dertaae. Commercial Aria,.
Lion Diviaitse, tlgi DussirtwAULAg.
Commerce Techr
(`ornmittee in.'
Economic D,.-ve:upr,ft-n( Con!
mi.,-swn
Ron G. Dow. Corporate. Brunk -
lye Park Charter Commission:
Gerald J Dupre, DSI). Supervi
sor. Columbus Township Biz ird,
George Dvorak, MAvD, Mayor.
Montgomery; Carolyn Emerson,
Corporate, Miotkapotts Private
tanning t omnussion: aamcs it.
,nn• MUD. Corinna Town -
Board. Gary Quick, DSD,
mundi, View City Council: Ro-
.x rt A'. R;i.nw.>.t n. TSC, Crystal
i.nvirorimen►al Commission;
Fred V Rhode. DSD, Burns
to •his 11mining and Zoning
iluilrn Robinson. Clirporale,
;:nra ,nf.i State Arty o.ird,
Corporate, St. Louts
i'ark limiding Construction
advisory Board' Michael
ntlahi. t-SD. Richfield City
•inc;i Merlin V. (Slim) Seel,
't,innrsula Corrections
:rt .161;ury location
16MIMD vendor
;grogram saves
from page i
tin it products thrt: ,h the
t +i : rndor repro sew alive
rt,.it-d vendors earn status
l : e!erred MUD vendors and
edge in future bidding;
ai±;ations
t:,., :au:e the program elimi-
s !•s-t,,.irc•e i-spec•fions and lag
il1P ti, c,re lot acceptance,
Cl i t•abze s:ivings on itnen-
r .: L _ 14:- w hic•h they may then
,.:rn uuo ineir next competitive
o:,irac•t bid.
`,!AvD credits a certified
oi,. G1r's competitive bid with the
'r•i;ar figure of inspection sav-
s. thus reducing bids. To
AvD, the low-cost vendor is not
r.rcessrrtly the low -price vendor.
brave Brock. Vice President of
Test Systems and Logistics Oper-
inns said, "Cooperation be-
.%t•en t erdor and contractor is
t, enti�z; to the production of
t h-quality aerospace and de-
4t nse products. We've seen a
remendous commitment gn the
part of our vendors to deliver
,00d that we. and our customers
:n turn. can rely on."
Gnatting at the reception held for Honeywellers active in civic and governmental positions above are, left to right,
Richard Barrett, DonalJ Thorson and Don Conley. V president of Public Affairs. ;it f',e phota below ai:efi are Stan
f4eeschl, left. and Rolland Baldwin and at right are P• ..ny Robinson and A. Fran', Smith.
L
11
Leader Lunch nominations due
from page i
mayor and the first woman to run
for public office and win in
Orono,'' Butler said. She was
appointed to the Planning Com-
mission 16 years ago• then won
election to the City Council thn-e
times before seeking and winning
the mayoral office.
Over the years. Butler said
she's noticed more women in
political leadership positions.
"And 1 think dint will toutinue.
When I'm in parades or at public
celebrations, I hear mothers fell-
ing their daughters that a woman
is the mayor and that thcv can be
one too," she said
Anyone can nominate a Iloney-
well woman to be recognized at
this year's Leader lunch, ac-
cording to Carolyn Sandberg,
Systems and Research Cent-r
Legal Counsel. and Chair of tiie
IIWC Ad lloc commitee
"We encourage Leader Lunch
honorees from past years to offer
nominations," she said. Wealso
encourage re -nomination of
women w o may not have been
selected in the past but who quaff
ty for the recognition -
Criteria and nomination forms
can be obtained from Sandberg byy
calling her at 7&-7'2i2. The deaei
line is April 15
refreshments and Mx►r prise- Hr
canned food for fc,,,d .ht•tc<•
memhet•ship card,
19UTF.%SIS LADDER H..,
Services ladder be ins play t;
ip. The'tenals ladder provwe, ii:.•
Opportunity for employe. !, it,
p.4r in ,,n nrti.tntr,.1 Umc
the: is cmiveniew to in-: i,
duly.:; Fc-4-Is$6.tor!mr tit•: :. _ .
Lon call B Y1-6666
GOLF!SeiCCEk,slit iB►1 I
ings still avaitahit r,•
viduals tt h.: want .
team Call 970 6661) r ;r
tion D-adl►nes apj,n.
up now
AIICRI►COM111 i F R -
bleat 1:1 H,e'I•..... .a .
MOTORt I 1 E ( 1.1 1:..
an tHt;er4 u t !,r,
t'rpirse ion sal .apt
nicturr\I:,tS ,.ire of '
Fitt in,,r,• i,;f, i .e.: 1 ..
{'i r,
Al,r t! : N::i t n:•,a I
sari w,i; ,preM us .. • +. �.,
Ali oh(ah • t o„
dwir prin F.rT:j:',:.r,
bt•r-� an(" !rivnds .t;
rhemica! drpNnden: e..,•
HunetiKeflers ,ind k w
For into 879-b.:814
The OWLS g !an :in e%-
ence on April lu t i i .,
tine north entrap: e, Pr. t•r
on Taking Charge W 1,w i � 1. .:
Si.c. ins; f'roductive 1 a .
trot DIN I. n.ernbers .c'
guests welrome $2 per per,an. S.. i
couple Buy ticket-, at the door
"For current ticket prices eliered
through lioneyweli Rernaue• S r%
ces call the department Hotline at"
3W To obtain tickets from Rec -.en i-
ces. send a wnurn regtxcf, includtiir
your same. mail station. ticket, de
sired. work phone number and
check (payable to Honeiiael; Rt4 rea
tionl to M%U-ilIll. .Altow I ; Itorkim:
days for delivery. Rev Sen it r, ticket
hours at G.0. are Mes.. 1 ne,., Wed .
Thurs. from t I am I pm. Fn.. 11 :im- t
pm fnfermatioa en otbrr.ert ire,
and recreatwo pricr:imsavailable ..
your plant', bra. hure rack or b%
calling �.066"
'Oli'/ED D�S�
MlPMEHAHA CREEK
WATERSHED DISTRIC
P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391
MAN OF MANAGERS: David H Cochran. Pres . Albert L Lehman . John E Thomas
Camille D. Andre . James 6 McWethy . James R Spensley • Richard H Mine!
To: Interested Citizens
Re: 1985 Annual Report
Dear Sir or Madam:
Mr0*4
14
lit NE MINNETONKA
April 18, 1986
Enclosed is a copy of the Annual Repor~ of Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District for 1985. Should you have any questions regarding
the District's activities, please feel free to contact any member of
the Board of Mdriagers.
'fiery truly yours,
David H. Cochran, President.
Board of Managers
Minne;�aha Creek Watershed District
2835n
Er-1osure
04
MINIVEHAHA CREEK .�
LAKE MINNETONKA
WATERSHED D19TRICT
P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 551vl ,
BOARD Of MANAGERS David H. Cochran. Wes . Albert L Lehman . John E Thomas
Camille D Anore • James B. McWethy . James R. Spenslay . Richard R. Miller
MINNEHAHA CREEK WP.TERSHED DISTRICT
ANNUAL REPORT FOR 1985
April, 1986
INDEX
Page
Introduction ........................................... 1
The Managers and Meeting Information ................... 1
Appointments to Board of Managers ...................... 2
Permit Applications .................................... 2
Hydrologic Data Collection ............................. 3
Gray's Bay Control Structure/Lake Minnetonka........... 3
Water Maintenance and Repair Fund ...................... 4
Minnehaha Creek Channel Improvements/Cascade Lane
Area, Edina (Project CP-8)............................. 5
Upper Watershed Storage and Retention Project,
Painter Creek Subwatershed (Project CP-5).............. 5
Watershed Management PlannLng Chapter 509/
Development of Revised District Rules .................. 5
Floodplain Regulation .................................. 6
Boundary Amendments .................................... 6
Cooperative Study with City of St. Louis Park.......... 6
Rule Providing for Recovery of Expenses ................ 7
Lake Minnetonka Tour ................................... 7
City of Long Lake/Cooperative Study .................... 7
Budget/1985............................................ 7
Financial Records ...................................... 7
INTRODUCTION
This Annual Report of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
provides a summary of the major activities of the Board of
Managers during 1985. Any person wishing additional detail i_j
encouraged to contact any individual manager.
THE MANAGERS AND MEETING INFORMATION
As of December 31, 1985, the names, addresses and terms of
the managers are as follows:
Camille D. Andre
Dav'3 H. Cochran
Albert L. Lehman
James B. McWethy
Richard R. Miller
James R. Spensley
John E. Thomas
10401 Cedar Lake Rd. :erm Expires
Apt. 419 March 8, 1986
4640 Linwood Circle Term Expires
Excelsior, MN 55331 March 8, 1987
3604 West Sunrise Drive Term Expires
Minnetonka, MN 55345 March 8, 1988
4380 Thielen Avenue
Edina, MN 55436
5340 Hollywood Road
Edina, MN 55436
5117 Chicago Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55417
6326 Smithtown Road
Excelsior, MN 55331
The present officers are:
David H. Cochran
President
Albert L. Lehman
Vice Presiden.
John E. Thomas
53ecreta ':
Camille D. Andre
Treasurer
Term Expires
March 8, 1986
Term Expires
March 6, 1988
Term Expires
March 8, 1987
Term Expires
March 8, 1986
During 1985, twelve regiiar meetings were held by the
managers on the third Thursday of each month at 7:30 p.m. In
order to make the meetings of the managers more accessible to all
residents of the District, the managers meet in odd numbered
months in the St. Louis Park Ci*y Hall and in even numbered month;
at the Wayzata City Hall.
The managers exchanged information with other governmental
units affected by the programs and policies of the watershed
district and honored requests to attend meetings of municipal,
county and state officials as well as meetings of interested
citizens. The managers received substant;al support and
assistance from the Hennepin and Carver County Boards of
Commissioners through the year whist► greatly assisted the District
in carrying out its programs during 1985.
During 1985, the managers continued to serve in organizations
dealing with water resource issues. President Cochran was elected
a director of the Minnesota Association of Watershed Districts,
and was selected to participate on the Water Resc=.►rces Board's
Chapter 509 Advisory Committee as well as the Metropolitan
Council's Task Force on Lake Minnetonka. The 'soar pirt:cipated
in the activities of the Metropolitan Area section of
Minnesota Association of Watershed Districts and in the
deliberations of the annual meeting of the Association, held
November 29-30, 1985.
The managers supplied copies of minutes of a.l meetings and
reports to interested citizens and to public official,:-, throughout
the District. Copies of the 1984 Annual Report were filed in 1985
with the Minnesota Water Resources Board, the department of
Natural Resources, the Boards of County Commissioners of Hennepin
and Carver Counties and with State Senators and Representatives
from the area within the watershed district.
APPOINTMENTS TO BOARD OF MANAGERS
The terms of Managers Albert
expired March 6, 1985. The Board
Hennepin County appointed Richard
to fill one of the two positions,
of the City of Minnetonka to fill
the oath of office April 2, 1985.
PERMIT APPLICATIONS
L. Lehman and Michael R. Carroll
of County Commissioners of
R. Miller of the City of Edina
and reappointed Albert L. Lehman
the other. Manager Miller took
The watershed district received 183 permit applications
during 1985. In each instance, the proposed project was review-d
in detail for compliance with the District's environmental
protection rules. Applications were received for projects such. as
dredging, filling, shoreline erosion protection, highway and
utility cr.ossinys, preliminary plat review and drainage and
grading plans for site development. Prior to acting on the
applications, considerable effort was spent with city staffs
and/or applicants to bring some of the proposed projects into
compliance A summary is attached to this report showing the
project lot-ition and type of application received.
As in previous years, a large majority of the applications
received were from the Lake Minnetonka portion of the watershed
district, reflecting the continuing urbanization of that area.
All permits granted by the watershed district specifically
require compliance with applicable municipal ordinances and, if
the permit involves Lake Minnetonka, the applicable ordinances of
the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District. In addition, permits
issued by the watershed district require compliance with any
applicable rules of the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources. The Board of Managers also took action as necessary
regarding complaints, permit violations and activities which had
been undertaken prior to issuance of a permit from the District.
HYDROLOGIC DATA COLLECTION
The District's hydrologic data collection program was
continued during 1985. The data for 1984 is published in the
Annual Hydrologic Data Report dated October, 1985. This is a very
comprehensive ogram, which, along with data from ot::r agencies
has formed a lo.,g-term data bank for use in managing the water
resources of the District, particularly Lake Minnetonka and the
city lakes. Copies of this report t:erc submitted to the Minnesota
Water Resources Board, the Council, the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency, the bepartment of Natural Resources, the
Freshwater Biological Institute, and local g,)vernment officials
and citizens' g•,- ps.
GRAY'S BAY CONTROL. STRUCTURE:/LAKE: MINNETONKA
During 1985, the District operated the Gray's Bay Control
Structure under the existing Management Policy and Operational
Plan approved by the Department of Natural Resources on May 20,
1983.
The existing management policy and operating plan was
reviewed by the Board in the Fall of 1985 to determine whether any
modifications in that plan were warranted in order to Leduce
flooding and control lake levels and stream flows. Following
review, the Board concluded that the plan did not warrant
modification and, pursuant to the terms of that plan and the DNR
permit, notified all municipalities within the District of its
intent to request renewal of the existing plan without
modification. The District requested the DNR to renew the plan on
December 30, 1985.
The managers also investigated means to add public safety
measures at the dam. The District, in connection with a project
proposed by the City of Minnetonka, authorized the use of Water
Maintenance and Repair Funds t, :onstruct a fence around the
c,)ntrol structure. As of ye- id, the City informed the District
that it would not be proceec promptly with its project. The
managers are evaluating the ,.,:suability of proceeding with the
public safety mprovements independent of the City project.
A new op Sting agreement was signed during 1985 between the
District and —e City of Minnetonka, providing for the City to
provide labor and other services as requested by the District for
the proper operation of the dam structure.
The control structure was closed for the winter season
December 10, 1985. Due to exceptionally high precipitation luring
the latter part of the fall season, Lake Minnetonka elevation was
at 929.07 as of that date, compared with the desired lake level
under the management policy of 928.6.
The managers continued to rely heavily upon participation of
each of 'he municipalities on Minnehaha Creek in recording creek
elevations and flows and reporting that data to the District. The
District prepared monthly summaries of this data and made these
summaries available to interested municipalities and citizens.
The assistance of each of the municipalities was invaluable to the
District in making the operati_,nal adjustments required dur�.ng
1985 to accomplish the management ob4ectives of the Headwaters
Control Structure.
WATER MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FUND
't . Board of Managers continued its practice of requesting
from the municipalities within the District suggestions for
maintenance projects to be paid in part from the District's Water
Maintenance and Repair Fund. From the numerous requests received,
the managers approved the followinq projects for 1985:
Estimated District
Project Municipality Cost Allocation
2 Excelsior -shoreline $20,000
50%
of actual
protection at
construction
costs
Excelsior Commons
not
to exceed
$4,000
for
rip rap only
3 Minnetonka -shoreline $5;000
50%
of actual
erosion protection
construction
costs
at Burwell House
not
to exceed
$2,500
As indicated earlier, the managers authorized
installation of fencing at the Gray's Bay Dam control structure in
connection with the City of Minnetonka project at the dam. The
authorization approved payment of 50% of the Cr-t of material and
labor for fence construction, not to exceed $1,000.
MINNEHAHA CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS/CASCADE LANE AREA, EDINA
(PROJECT CP-8)
Channel improvements authorized by the Board or. December 19,
1983 in the Cascade Lane ares .f Edina to help reduce high water
problems in this area were not completed by the contractor during
the Winter of 1984.
The contractor commenced work January 8, 1985 and completed
the project by 1:etruary 21, 1985. The Minnesota Department of
Transportation committed to pay up to a maximum of $30,000 for the
cost of the project. The City of Edina also contributed to the
project.
UPPER WATERSHED STORAGE AND RETENTION PROJECT, PAINTER CREEK
SUBWATERSHED PROJECT CP-5
Pur,.aant to a contract awarded December 20, 1984, work on the
Uppe Water. ,ed Storage and Retention Project in the Painter Creek
subwatershe-i commenced on January 9, 1985. All projects,
consisting of flow control devices and charnel improvements, to
slog tt rate of runoff into Lake Minnetonka, and imprn%,e water
quality, were completed by the contractor by July 17, except
for minor site restoration.
Of the 25 parcels over which easements were r.eeded for the
project, voluntary agreement was reached with the owners of 21
properties. Valuation hearings were held by District
Court -appointed commissioners with respect to the four remaining
properties ir., 1985. All awards were paid by May, 1985.
WAT%RSHED M. "NT PLANNING CHAPTER 509/DEVELOPMENT OF REVISED
DIS''RICT RUL-
During '9 significant portion of the District's work in
the development its 509 Plan consisted of the development of
computer modeling oL" the hydrologic characteristics of the entire
watershed. By the end of 1985, this work wa:: being placed iti
final form by the istrict.'s engineers for presentation to the
Board of Managers.
As a part of its Chapter 509 work, the Bcard of Managers also
determined that it would be appropriate to prepare and adopt
revised rules of the District, incorporating and based upon the
Chapter 509 policy tatemerits which had been developed by the
Board during 1984. The '_es clarify the permitting program of
the District, and proviL clearer statements of the requirements
.. S .-
of each rule. Accordingly, the District prepared draft revised
rules, and held a public hearing on the proposed revised rules on
November 21, 1985, at which hearing a number of interested persans
appeared or submitted comments. As of year end, the Board had
directed the staff to incorporate these comments into the proposed
revised rules for consideration by the Board early in 1986.
FLOODPLAiN REGULATION
The issue of floodplain filling continued to be an area of
concern to the managers, p- `A cul rly in St. Louis Park and Edina,
where residents along Mi.nnk sha Creek have experienced high water
conditions and have brought those concerns befor._ :he manaq 3.
The managers continued to urge a.71 creekside municipalities ,o
amend their floodplain ordinances to prohibit any further filling
in the floodplain in Minnehaha Creek, since additional
encroachment in the floodplain contributes to higher water levels
and peak flows thereb, increasing the potential of darnage to
structures and property.
BOUNDARY AMF'NDMENTS
On May 17, 1995, the Water Resources Board, in response to a
petition from the District, and following hearing, issued an order
amending the District's boundaries. This action was coordinated
with the decisions by the Water Resources Board on the legal
boundaries of all watershed districts and water management
organizations adjoining the District.
In addition to these District -initiated modifications, the
City or Victoria petitioned the Water Resources Board to amend the
boundary of the District to include additional lands within the
City of Victoria within the legal bUdndary of the Minnehaha Creek
W,tershed District. The Board of Menagers supported the petition
of the City of Victoria for this chan,e, and on December 13, 1995,
the Water Resources Board issued an Order approving the c.ha-
sought by the City of Victoria.
COO^ERATIV£. STUDY WITH CITY r'E 5T. LOUIS PARK
During 1985, the District's engineering staff and the
engineering staff of the City of St. Louis Park undertook a
cooperative study to investigate drainage patter-! within a
subwatershed in the Ci•-
of St.. Louis Park, identified by the
Drstiict as MC-19. The Board was particularly concerned with this
area due to previous contamination at the former Reilly Tar and
Chemical site located in this subwatershed. The results of that
study were reported to the Board in February, 1985. The City of
St. Louis Park, in response to thz- ^tudy, committed to implement
such steps as it deemed appropriate �Lnd necessary to deal with
6
localized flooding issues identified by the .tu6y.
water quality data for the Sr-*' Oak ..-' !ntion Pond was also
reviewed by the Kard of Managers 4- IV & j. The Board invited
representatWen of the Minnesota Pol'u. i no ntrol Agency to brief
the Board with ;Lrpect to water quality lssuen and the proposed
remedial acti(i plan to be implemented at the fo_ner Reilly Tar
site.
RULE PROVIDING FOR RECOVERY OF FYPENSES
During June and July, the Board of Manap z reviewed problems
arising where individuals perform work withou. a District permit,
and then lat r apply for f permit War the fact, and problems
associated with viv:aton A issue( permits. The managers
concluded that it "oulU be appropriate to charge such applicants
fee equaling the .ost of the District's engineering evaluation of
such applications or violations. On Ser.tember 19, 1985, the Board
of Managers held a nublic hearing t : a proposed Rule whit. would
impose fees in those circumstances. The rule was adopted by the
Board following ` public hearing.
LAKE MIUNETONKA T OR
In order to better fami arize .lagers with permit
issues as they a.;se , the V. „iity c,_ ake Minnetonka, the Board
of Mana4, - conducted a tour of selected bays of Lake Minnetonka
in June, 1 85.
CITY OF_ITE/COOPERATIVE STUDY
In c, CY 4i`_h the developm-no of an industrial area in
the City of Long the managers _ouraged the City of Long
%ake to develop rehensive sto;mwater management plan fir
that nubwatershed. llow'aq meetings between the District staff
and amity's Stif and elected officials, a conceptual plan was
stir •n - Bard of Managei] by the end of 1985.
Bv,
by law, the managers, pursuant to notic held a
I t so- Ky r" Septembe 19, 1585 on proposed budgets for the
DTI ;-'t Administrative I water Maintenance and Repair Fund,
are--ver4aed. Management Pia....ing Fund. Following the public
hearing, the managers adopted budgets fo. 1986 for these funds ane
certified tax levies to the Coun*'es fnr collection.
FINANCIAL Rr.COitDS
The financial records of the District :re kept by a certified
- 7-
public accountant. All financial transactions are recorded in the
minutes of its meetings.
The treasurer of the District maintained separate records for
five funds in 19V, (1) the Administrative Fund; (2) tt. Water
Maintenance and f.�pair Fund; (3) the Data Acquisition Fund; (4)
Watershed Management Planning Fund, and (5) the Upper Watershed
Project Fund (CP-5). Records for each of these funds include the
dates and amounts of all expenditures, the names of individuals
receiving payment an-3 the purposes for which payment is made.
The official depository for the District is the Wayzata State
Bank, Wayzata, Minnesota.
During 1985, the financial records of the District were
audited for the year 1984 and a copy of th( -udit was filed with
the State Auditor for the State of Minnes; .n April 1985.
2498n
Respectfully submitted,
r-
6 L.6"L-- z
id -chran, President
-d c. ..wagers of the
P::nnehaha Ckeek Watershed District
-A-
1985 PERMIT APPLICATIONS
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
_
Chanhassen
2
1
1
1
5
Dee haven
1
4
1
1
7
Edina
2
1
3
'rcelsior
I
1
1
3
olden Valley
0
Greenwood
5
1
6
Hopkins
0
Independence
0
Laketown Twp.
I
I
Long Lake
4
1
2
7
Maple Plain
i
1
2
" - , r41 n a
1
1
-
Minnetonka
19
3
1
3
I
1
1
1
1
29
3
Minneapolis
1
Minnetonka Beach
0
Minnetrista
1
7
8
Mound
5
3
8
1 2
18
Orono
1
1
23
1
1
27
P1 ymouth
6
1
7
Richfield
1
2
2
5
St. Bonifacius
0
St. Louis Park
5
1
1
2
9
orewood
4
1
7
3
15
.,ring Park
1
1
1
3
Tonka Bay
2
_
1
1
10
14
Victoria
1
1
3
I
;
6
�a-znta ?
W o c d l a n r! �
Total Pe-mit
App ins 58
_
�
—
1
�
3
1
13
_1
9
75
b
6
13 11183
PERMIT APPLICATION CATEGORIES
A - Grading and Drainage
8 - Bridge. Cuiverc or Utilities
C - F1 oodpi a in Development
D - Dredging
E - Shoreline ImprovemL nts or Rip Pali
F - Shoreline Setback Varience
G - Fill or Excavation
H - Other Categories
I - Municipality Total
i..;r; .' 4utler, YAyor
Cronu City Offices
l x7 j Brown ;load South
Crystal Bay, M 55313
Dear Mayors
We use the interasctio:i of 3rown load North and ' ,::w ,, 1'
almost ever; dray, and we have ilu yrobl en with it. fP-Mo lti , t'lE
road through Reber's woods do-2.1 be a hut;r waste of money and a
poor use of a beautiful `iece of Ian!:.
We :an saP Vr--t if so -,;one unfa-ilie.r wit- they road were?
to approach the intersc tion from t'-e nurtl when it was icy,
he miGht 1,_.ve trouble st: r-Fin- on the hill. 3ut 3rown .toad :'--rth
is only n half mile lo.,:P-, and it woua . be ,u-i extrava•ance to
re-route it. 6 -rich cheaper solation wou?.4 be to put a speed biLip
at the top of Vne hill --with appropriate •.--,trninZ signs, of course --
to prevent i,PT-le from co%iin,: into t-.e intersection too fast.
Sincerely.,
.i chap _.. a. . �-ren "i:: i nski
V
4 8 L
QUO ic_er Tan»r
c r� Df M LM, r,
if Crtcii
U 'F t
cc 1 4.,
Y..' ,
Ek rCE
1.%ef t
c- nc- ;ot4rv. •0
L %
7W n
. t
Cd L.. h f;, ve et vc % r
a--- t '-'n c ry o s e 6, t y .
I r. - �.Wry
v
13
_t
}\kO
� CL
WO
eL i i • C3-
(DL..
11
l�1 A5'� J`
�4� Gl.� �1 Q,'V`-4
Q./ti'YL LJ �1�Z'ti�t
1rko W V \
t c
a, ,
�m uv,
_QAA-A,JAA
QUA
4rc
Cftk
usA-V\�
�zw�,D-w
aj�-uj ka4,
o ��
P wa"
,v54V�
...400,0
. J ' `. `
z
�4`i5 11r.JlR.e,� Qti .
5535�
or
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEE'ING OF THE SCHOOL BOARD
OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278
HELD ON MARCH 5, 1986
The special meeting of the School Board of Orono Independen' School District No.
278 was held on Tuesday, March 5, 1986.
Present: Dave McKown Kitty Crosby William Levering
Don Anderson James Franklin Lucie Taylor
UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the Board waived the 3
day posting notice.
Dave McKown stated that the purpose of this meeting was to make a decision as to
the next superintendent of the Orono School District, the finui candidates
being Dr. Bruce Anderson of West St. Paul and Dr. Thomas Mich of Burnsville as
Elliott Moeser of Blackfoot, Idaho had withdrawn his application because he was
a finalist for another superintendency.
Discussion ensued regarding st,engths/qualifications of each candidate in rela-
tion to educational/administrative leadership for the Orono School District.
UPON MOTION by Bill Levering, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the Board w4ll offer the
position of Superintendent of ; Orono School District to Dr. Thorlas Mich.
Nay: Dave McKown and Jim Franklin.
UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Lucie Taylor, upon acceptance of the
contract by Dr. Thomas Mich, the Board agrees to fully support the superinten-
dent in his new position. Carried unanimously.
UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Kitty Crosby, the meeting was
adjourn-4.
Kat eri a Crosby, C Terk
Approved:
Dive Mc o-,in, Cha•.rman
MINUTES OF T1E MCEi. SCHOOL BOARD
OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SL-;vUL DISTRICT NO. 278
HELD ON MARC,,' 10, 1986
The regular meeting of the School Board o` Orono Independent School District No.
278 was held on Monday, March 10, 1986.
Present: Dave Mr_Kown James Franklin James Seiter
Dun Anderson William Levering William Fenholt
Kitty Crosby Lucie Taylor
UPON MOTION L, Lucie Taylc , seconded by Jim Franklin, the minutes -)f the
February 3, 1986 Superintendent Search Committee meeting were approved as
presented.
UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the minutes of the
February 8 and 9, 1986 Superintei. _nt Search Committee/Board meeting were
approved as presented.
''nON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Jim `-ranklin, the minutes of the
F bruary 10, 1986 meeting were approved as presented.
Lucie Taylor stated that the Orono Planning Commission held a meeting on Marsh
3, 1986 regarding the Highway 12 corridor study. At this meeting proposals were
reviewed for land development but no decision will be made U-1til March 31, 1986.
UPON MOTION by Don ".:,:Arson, seconded by Bill Levering, letters of commendation
will be sent to the following sixth grade students for their participation in
the state competition of the odyssey of the Mind contest: Chiara Wood, Alexis
Sentell, Sara Racciatti, Ann Caldwell and Sara Borchers. Thes4 students placed
s^cond in this Luunpetition. Appreciatit,n will also be expressed to their
teacher, Mrs. Linoa Anderson and Mrs. Thomas Racciatti, parent.
The following students were also commended by the Zoard:
Doug Williams Orono Middle Sch ztuder,t, winner of the regional
spelling contest ,y._ n�j kn to state competition
Tracy Johnson Orono Middle School st-rient, winner of the regional "Hoop
Shoot" free throw contest going on to state competition
Kelly Heart Orono Middle School student who is in training for the
Tetrathlon which wil'. take place in Virginia this summer
Steve Bendt c-humann Elementary student who participated in the Art
ow at the State Capitol on March 7, 1986.
UPON uTION by Bill Levering, seconded by Kitty Crosby, Warren Dalen's r•es�gna-
tion as math teacher at Orono High School was accepted. Tice Board expressed
appreciation to Mr. Ualen for his 32 years of service to the Orono School
Distract.
UPON MOTION by Bill levering, seconded by Don Anderson, Gordon Harstad's
resignation as industrial arts teacher at Orono High School was accepted. The
Board expressed appreciation to Mr. Narstad for his 18 years of service to the
Orono School District.
UPON MOTION by Bi' gyring, seconded by Jinn Franklin, approval was granted to
hire Wendy Wile a, eacher.
UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Lurie Taylor, approval was granted to
incorporate grades 4 and 5 into an intermediate school whi," will be housed in
the middle school with Ron Gilbert acting as principal of this new unit.
Mr. Seiter stated that this proposal has been presented, as it developed, to the
parents and the main concern has seemed to be the bussing issue. After
researci:ing this Is._ the administration proposes that the Board adopt the
concept of the ern, ate school and that Lhe hours be the same as the middle
school because c, flexii.ility/better use of staff and opportunities that would
be available ir extracurricular activities.
Discussion ensued regarding possible solutions to the bussing issue which
included the possibility of seat assignments or involving older children in a
leadership - Decisions/alternatives will be studied/explored as to the best
solution for 11 invelv-1.
Jim Seiter expressed appreciation to the parents who had provided
input/comments/suppor- during this decision making process. _d stated that the
responses/comments that were made were from a positive position an.• administra-
tion appreciates the involvement of the parent-z.
Jim Seiter informed the Board that considerable thought/t'me was gi 'n to the
proposal which had been presented to the Board by the Gifted and Talei.ted Task
Force at the January 13, 1986 Board meeting. Mr. Seiter stated that the report
was well done but because of financial concerns, the administration 4s pro-
ceeded cautiously in its recommendations.
Discussion ensued regarding the gifted and talen. proposal. ..rpas of concern
were the development of a district -wide policy rt. to make-up work for stu-
dents in pull-out classes, 4nv�lvement of r,,mmut.i,y volunteers in the area of
commuricatiun clid allocation/structure of po „ tion to provide assistan,e te. the
Gifted Facilitator on tlp high school level.
UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded Fy Kitty Crosby, the adrnin. istratio, s
response to the prc dusals rresented 5y the Gifted and Ta'ented I'ask Force
tabled until the April 14 1986 Board meeting in order to allow time
clarification/discussion of -.ne Board's concerns.
LPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Bill Levering, the Board accepted
Superintendent Jim Seiter's retirement, effective June 30, 19"6, with appre-
lation for his years of service as a teacher, as an admin,,trator and as
s_, -intender'. Mrs. Crosby stated thdt these years have `__,i very gratifying
`or everyone 4i;d the District is deeply grate.:.].
The Board expressed appreciation to Bill Fenholt for his time/efforts it pro-
viding them with the updatE whit-h they felt s very info rnat4v .
The Board received a long-range plan which had been developed by District au '-
nistration. This plan provides them with information regarding finan'�ia impli-
cations in the next 3 to 4 years as wEil as building utilization, etc. Mr.
Seiter st^',�d that this plan represents the direction that administration feels
the Dist should follow and clarifys that direction for the Board.
UPON MOTION by Don Anders seconded by Lucie Taylor, the Activity Fund Report
for the 2nd quarter of the .j85-86 school year was apprrved as presented.
UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by L ie Taylor, the Treasurer's Report
for January, 1986 was approvr :sented.
lituN MOTION by Jima Franklin, :4 by Kitty Crosby, the b4IIs as covered by
vouchers 051247 through 05134:, 496 *hroogl, 0512a6 are manual checks) and
050073 through 050601 were aFuroveo as present
UPON MOTION by Bi;. Levering, seconds-d by Jim Franklin, 'le meet,,g was
adjourned.
YKt_)h�r one P. ros—by , V e r k
Appr- ...d:
Dave MIrNih , Chairman
GOVERNMENT
April , 1986
TRAINING :�ERVl�c
TO: Minnesota Local Elected Officials
FR: Helene Johnson, Executive Director, Government Training Service
We at GTS are exploring the idea of a special Summer Institute for Local Elected
Officials and would very much appreciate your input. Could you take just a few
minutes to indicate your suggestions on conten', format and timing?
We anticipate working with Brian Lee, a professional seminar leader who has
served as a City Alderman for the City of Calgary and is currently a Member of
t!,e Legislative As';embly for Alberta. He conducted several orcgrams for 1ncAl
and statE elected t)fficials in Minnesota in Jan'Jary which were enthusiastically
received, but covered too much in too short a tune! A summer program would
allow more time in a relaxed setting. The development of a special manual on
Serving Your Constituents is also a possibility.
POSSIBLE TOPICS
Below are possible components of the Institute. Please indicate your level of
interest in having these topics includea within the Institute.
Very Somewhat
Interested Int.erested Interested Interested
Serving Your Constituents While
Saving Your Sanity
• How to Remember Name
• Communicati;ig Effectivciy
with Constituents by Phone
and Letter ;including re--
sFonding to complaints)
• Handling Pol is `:peaking
Responsibiliti-s (frog,
greetings to speeches)
• How to Lobby and be Lobbied
• Tools of the Elected Offi-
cial: Humor, Persuasion,
Appearance
Media Relations
Creative Problem -Solving for
Results
Balancing Two Careers
Formulating Positions on Policy
Issues
Other (please specify)
Suite 202 Minnesota Building • 46 East Fourth Street • St. Paul, Min+resota 55101 • 612'222.7409
(Over)
Please rank the following options ir. order �f preference. Use #1 to indicate your
first choice, #2 to indicate your second c _e, etc.
FORMAT
One full day
Evening program plus full day
Two full days with informal activities on evening of Day 1
Informal evening get-together on Day 1, full program plus free evening on
Day 2, morning program on Day 3
Other (please specify)
DATF" S DAYS
July (1st 2 weeks) � Monday and/or Tuesday
�-" July (2nd 2 weeks) _ Wednesday and/or Thursday
Auaust (1st 2 weeks) r' Thursdav and/or Friday
August (2nd 2 weeks) v Weekend
Other
LOCATION
Resort setting (Brainerd)
Twin C'ties
St. Cloud
❑ Plew )ut my name on the mailing list to receive information about pur-
chase._ a manual focusine on Serving Your Ccnst-,tuents.
❑ Please put my name on the m0 ling list to receive information about the
Sumner Institute when and if sched-,;:ed.
Name: Title:
Affiliation(City, County, School Disf—rict, TownsSip):
Address: Daytime Phone:
Please return to the Government Training Service by May 5, 1986.
Leaders are both products and creators
of social change. Consequently, knowing
and responding appropriately to changing
values. new rules of bahavior, different
assc1171ptions about the world can
significantly increase personal, profes-
sional. and especially political eftec-
tiveness. This workshop offers the rare
opportunity to focus on all these aspects
of your life, with expert guidance from an
individual described by Ca ' Rogers as
"one of the most gifted and unusual per-
sons I know. Musician... humorist... wilder
ness explorer... teacher and psychologist.
His abilities are astounding."
TOPICS
• The Stress of Change —Hour It Affects
the Individual, the Organization. the
Community
• Differing Vatue Systems of Four
Generations —Implications for
Motivating Others
• Formal and Informal Power —Tapping
Both for Use in Leadership
• The New Leadership —Doing Well by
Doing Good
• Psychological Contracts— Everybody's
Hidden Agenda
• The Changing Rules of Our Lives —
From High Sc tool to fYlidiife and
Beyond
• -io,.v to Look Beyond Ambition for a
Meaniroful Life
WHO SHOULD ATTEND
Especially for elected policymakers serv-
ing in cities, counties, school districts.
to,rrnships
DATE/TIMES
Wednesday, May 14. 19%
8:30 a.m. Check -in
9.00 Program Begins
1:00 p.m_ Lunch and Sharing
2:90 Adjourn
FACULTY
LAYNE L-ONGFELLOW is a research
psychologist ty training and a protes-
sianal speaker and seminar leader by
mid-life transition. A college professor
and academic vice president until 1976.
he then joined the staff of The Menninger
Foundation, where he was Director of
Seminars for Executives. In 1978, at age
40, ha established his own company, Lec-
ture Theatre, Inc He has since presented
well over 1,000 speeches and seminars to
audiences in this country and elsewhere.
He specializes in multi-medi;• presenta-
tions incorporating lecture, slides,
graphics and music as well as Seminars
in the Wilderness (combining outdoor ex-
peditions with seminars). He comes to us
with rave reviews from appearances at
events he :d by such organizations as the
National League of Cities, the Arizona
League of Cities, and the International
City Management Association.
LOCATION
The Sunwood Inn (612-647-1637) is
located between the St Paul and Min-
neapolis business districts at Bandana
Square in St. Paul's Energy Park commer
csal development. Exit 1-94 at either the
Snelling or Lexington Avenue exits in St
Paul. Proceed north to Energy Parts
Drive —turn right off Snelling or left oft
Lexington. Look for the bright ran Ban-
dana Square identification.
REGISTRATION INFORMATION
Your registration fee o' $60 per person+ i
cludes lunch and coffee breaks. Space �s
limited: send the attached ►eserva'fon
form early to insure your place at the
workshop' Registrations must 5e re-
ceived by Wednesday, May 7
CANCELLATIONS/REFUNDS
�o cancel your registration and receive a
refund you must notify GTS by Noon or
Monday, May 12. if you cancel after tha!
-ate and have not prepaid, you will be
billed for the total registration fee. Alter-
naite repress ntatives may attend for
registered participants.
Should inclement weather (or other cir-
cumstances beyond our control)
necessitate program canceilatior or
postponement, participants will be
notified via announcements on WCCC
Radio and other local radio stations.
S.
REGISTRATION FORM
Workshor, for Elected Officials
Wedne-Jay, May 14, 1986
Name
Affiliation (City/County/School District/To�%nship)
AdoresS
_. Title
_ Piione (Daytirne;
L Enclosed is my check for $60.00 (Payable to Government Training Service)
Please bill me ($2 bil!"• g fee)
Aeturr. ty May 7 to Government Training Service, 202 Minnesota Budding,
493 East 4th Ut St. Paul, MN 55101 (612/222-7409 or Minnesota toll -free
800i652-s719)
��
�� a
O
N C -_ w
cO -J'
In
n
ANC
m
2
0
ro
3D
O
Z
mvZ4:>KGKc-0='83N0--f>
c<02.w3_ on cnrn
M>5 i o o 0 � iv �Dv � -a ?_
M
Cr
__?
o�3La Co m
.Maag"�°ov m
3--a'�'�?gym �O
ac»oy»��z^�n)Vc,CD ,CO
!E40pr>w Rot
�aom < 0 °ac Z
cA tA' F G 41 p fTt
3 cn��.� --= rm Cacn Z
{/