Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-14-1986 Council PacketMINUTES OF THE. REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 1986 ATTENDANCE 7:00 P.M. The Orono Council met on the above date with the i-)llowing members present: Mayor Butler, Councilmembers Grabek_, Frahm, and Hammerel. Councilmember Adams arrived at 7:16 P.M. The following represented the City staff: Acting City Administrator Gerhardson (Public Works Coordinator), Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Zoninq Administrator Gaffron, Chief of Police Ki 1 bo, and City Recorder Peterson. Also present Were City Engineer Cook and City Attorney Blatz. YEAR XII URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMWINIT'Y DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS PUBLIC HEARING 7:00 - 7:14 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication was noted. Acting City Rdministrator Gerhardson explained the purpose of the public hearing to consider t'.-ie proposed use of Year X1I Community Development Block Grant monies in the amount of $18,689.00 to be allocated (and added to previous amounts) to reducing the sanitary sewer assessments to the residents in Crystal Bay that qualify in t';- low to moderate income level. Gary Printup, 1261 Briar St., stated that he was recently informed of an additional $70,000 of funds that have arrived from "somewhere" that are going to be usea to pay 10 parcels of eligible sewer assessments, in one amount this year, so that there will to no reapplications in succeeding years for people that may fall victim to circumstances beyond their control to make application for funds in the future. Iie questioned !here this additional $70,000 come from and why it is earmarked to pay assessments off at one time and not go under* the program -f annual reapplication. He noted that this information was contained in a letter from City Attorney Padio to Crystal- Bay resident's attorney, of which he did not have a copy of in his possession. City Attorney Blatz !stated that Attorney Radio will be present later in the meeting to clarify this matter. In the meantime, Mr. Printup left the meeting to obtain a copy of this lc,tter he has referenced. Mayor Butler- stated that the Public Hearing regarding the Year XII funds mLst continue. There were no other comments from the public and the Public Hearing was c-10Sed. I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 1986 YEAR XII URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY continued It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to approve the application for request of Community Development Block Grant Funds for Year XII as outlined. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. CGNSENT AGENDA* OATH OF OFFICE Upon Attorney Radio's presence, he was asked to provide the Crystal Bay residents with answers regarding the formula for dispersal of $70,000 for certain sewer assessment charges. Attorney Radio stated that the $70,000 in question is monies from previous years CDBG funds and also discretionary funds provided from the County Board to pay off qualifying sewer assessments. Acting City Administrator Gerhardson advised the resident • present for this matter to come to his office during office hours for clarification of these funds and the procedure for disbursement. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to approve the Consent Agenda* subject to removal of item 18 (Special Events Summary Ordinance) upon staff's request. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. Chief of Police Kilbo introduced Mr. Larry Tomcheck. Acting City Administrator Gerhardson administered the Oath of Office to Larry Tomcheck appointing him a Police Officer for the City of Orono. NOTE: COUNCILMEMBER ADAMS ARRIVED AT THIS TIME. COMKENDATION -- ROSEMARY ROSEDAHL RESOLUTION 11976 chief of lice Kilbo introduced Rosemary Rosedah.l who assiste malice in the apprehension of the suspect involveG in the armed robbery at. Snyders Drug Store in Long Lake committed on February 23, 1986. He noted that Ms. Rosedahl provided police with a description of the suspect and en Febru_try 24, 1986, when the suspect. telephoned her, she engaged him in a telephone conversation for approximately one and a half hours during which tirre Northwestern Bell Security had ample .ime to trace the telephone call thereby enabling the coordination of law enforcement personnel from Hennepin County, Orono Police, Ramsey CoI,nty Sheriff's Department and New Brightoh Police to apprehend the suspect. 2 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEEIING HELD APRIL 14, 1986 COMMENDATION continued After the proposed resolut. _,ri was read to the publ. by Mayor Butler, it was mover. by Mayor Butler, seconds, oy Councilmember Adams, t.-, adopt Resolution $1976 a General Commendation to Ro:Finary Rosedahl. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to approve the Minutes of the March 10, 1986 Council meeting as submitted. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Planning Commissicn member Maureen Bellows was present and had no comments at this time. PUBLIC COMMENTS Regarding the previous matter of Cormunity Development Block Grant Funds, LaDean McWilliams, 1130 Willow Dr., questioned what type of programs were repayment pr -ams. She also mentioned the ci_ty's involvement of su. dinati.on to assist homes mers in refinancing. Acting City Administrator Gerhardson noted that there has been one request and that at this time the City wi l 1 handle this type of request on an individual basis. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: #935 WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB* 200 W. WAYZATA BLVD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RBSOLUTION #1977 It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to adopt Resolution #1977 granting a Conditional Use Permit to permit certain grading projects regulated under Municipal Zoning Code Serction 10.03 Subdivision 19, and to permit construction of a shelter building per Section 10.20 Subdivision 3. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. #967 i i968 JOHN B.A. IDSTROM* 2580 FOX STREET PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL RESOLUTION 11978 It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to adopt. Resolution #1978 granting Preliminary Approval for a Plat at 2580 Fox Street. Mot i can , Ave 4, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 1986 #990 WARD FERRELL 3405 WATERTOWN ROAD VARIANCE - SECOND REVIEW Acting City Administrator Gerhardson expla-ned the request for a lot width and lot area variance for two rural properties on Watertown Road noting this was previously reviewed by Council on march 10, 1986.which at that time was tabled because the entire Council was not present to review it. Ward Ferrell was present for this matter and stated his attorney unaware of this meeting and was unable to attend due to a previous appointment. Mayor Butler asked Mr. Ferrell if he wished to defer this matter until the next Council meeting in order for his attorney to be present. Mayor Butler informed him that if this application is denied, he must wait six months to reapply. Mr. Ferrell stated that he would like to proceed with his application and depending on the outcome will consult with his attorney. He noted that he still feels that he is entitled to build a house and sell one lot to help pay for his retirement home as long as he has owned the land since 1948. Ferrell stated he divided it because the Council asked him to in 1958, and the Council accepted the four lots and that the present Council has a moral obligation to honor what that Council told him. Zoning Administrator Gaffron updated Councilmemhers Grabek and Hammerel (who were absent at the March loth meeting) that Mr. Ferrell was requesting permission for 3 homes or a total of 2.9 acres in a two -act a zone. The 3 lots are commonly owned by Mr. Ferrell anA consist of 1.01 acres (upon which Mr. Ferrell's present home is located), 1.04 acres, and .85 acres respectively. He noted that applicant has submitted soil testing and site plans to indicate that both septic systems and houses can be placed on each lot. He noted that the question is whether this would yet a precedent by granting approval. Mr. Ferrell noted that the "28 similar case" parcels noted in staff's memo are less than two acres with the exception of one and that none of these parcels have been owned as long as he has owned his property. Mr. Ferrell sta�pd that he had planned to build a retirement home on one lot and sell the other lot for payment for the house and retirement equity. He feels that the financial hardship should he considered. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 1986 #990 WARD FERRELL continued Mayor Butler stated that the Council has to consider the legalities involved with future requests if they were to approve his application. Councilmember Adams noted that even by allowing one home to be built would require a variance of the 2 acre minimum lot requirement. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that the zoning code has changed during the time that Fe-,reil has owned the property, however the code did not specifically address "commonly owned" lots until 1984. City Attorney Blatz stated that it was the COuncil's duty to enforce the code as it stands today and that comments made by previous councilmembers are not legally binding. Councilmember Grabek noted that (per memo) within a 1/2 mile radius of the applicants property, there were 37 houses with less than 2 acres and 39 with 2 acres or more. He stated that part of the common ownership rationale was "how do these lots fit in the surrounding area"? He questioned if. Ferre1l's 1 +: would support septic systems. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that tLe lets would support septic systems under limited development i.e. no tennis court, pool, etc. Councilmember Grabek asked City Attorney Slatz the legal ramifications involved if this were approved. Attorney Blatz stated that there is a potential problem which the Council should reveiw. As far as granting a variance, Council must find an undue hardship to Mr. Ferrell. She noted that in 1981 a similar request was denied because applicant did not demonstrate a hardship, no sanitary sewer was available, and insufficient area and width. She stated that it is her opinion that if Council cannot differentiate Mr. Ferrell's property from others, that by grantinq the request in effect they would be changing the ordinance. Councilmember Crabek questioned whether there would be legal justification to approve this application without changing the ord-nanc,2 based on 1) a house can be built on each lot safely with septic system 2) it is consistent with the neighborhood size 1(,*s 3) applicant h.,f; been a citizen of Orono since 1936. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 1986 i990 WARD FERRELL continued Attorney Blatz stated that it is a policy decision Council must decide upon and that the undue hardship finding must be spelled out in the resolution to support the variance approval. Councilmember Grabek stated that it seemed to be the "just" thing to do to grant this variance and he felt it would not be making that much of -n exception for other cases that may come up. Mayor Butler stated that this was a dilemma due to the unique circumstances however, she felt realistically she would have to recommend denial because, in her view, it would completely change the zoning policy. She expressed her fear in having to plant another sewer system. Councilmember Frahm stated that he has problems with the "common ownership" issue and whether there is a difference between sewered areas vs. non-sewered areas. He rioted that if this request were approved the ordinance should be changPd and be more clearly defined. Councilmember Grabek stated that he felt the direction of the change made in 1.974 was to be able to provide a reviewal on an individual basis. Planning Commission member Bellows stated that one wad to differentiate between common ownership vs. separate ownership, in separate ownership the hardship would be not allowing them to use their property, whereas, in Mr. Ferrell's case he is able to live on his property and use it. She also noted that the only hardship in Mr. Ferrre 1 l's case is r i_nancia 1 which cannot be considered as a valid hardship. Mayor Butler noted that she would be open to allowing one additional home but not two. Councilmember Hammerel stated that this is a hard decision but he felt two houses in an area where there is not enough area for ore house %, thci t a variance is an Excess, especially i. an unsewered zone. Councilmember Adams stated that he felt sympathetic in Mr. Ferrell's case but tie felt l acre lots in an unsewered area is undesirable. Councilmember Gralyek questioned whether there would be a problem because Mr. Ferrell's attorney was not notified. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 1996 i990 WARD FERRELL continued Attorney L;latz stated that she felt Mr. Ferrell made a knowledgable waiver of attorney and was made aware that he could have delayed the matter in order to have his attorney present. Councilmember Grabek questioned if approval of this request would significantly impact the non -severed area. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that in his opinion, it would not have a significant -'mpact in that particular area. Mayor Butler stated that taking into consideration that the request is for development of three residential units on 2.9 acres in a 2-acre zone; it was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to direct staff to prepare a resolution of denial based on the f.ollowino: At this F•)int, Mayo: Butler again stated that she felt it fair to inform Mr. Ferrell, that before an actual vote and decision is made, he has the option to request tabling of his application in order for his attorney to be present. Mr. Ferrell's response was that he dicl not think it would make any difference because the Council has already made up their minds. 1) Extent cf variances. 2) Known fallibility of septic systems on small lots. 3) Denial does not deprive owner's rights to reasonable use as residential property as it stands now. 4) No hardship to the land justifying request. 5) Zoning code demands 2 acres of dry buildable property per parcel wherein this parcel is 2.9 acres overall requesting 3 buildable lots. "got 10n, ryes 4, Nays 11.007 CAR 7, TRAPP* 4701 WEsSI 6RANCH ROAD PRELIMINI.ARY SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION /1979 Carol 'Trapp was prese Councilmember Grabek voted nay. for this mat -ter. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to adopt Resolution #1979 granting Preliminary approval for a plat at 4701 West Branch Road. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 7 MINUTES OF' THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 1986 #1010 DUANE H. HALL 1860 SHADYWOOD ROAD PRELIMIN"Y SUBDIVISION Acting City A 3trator Gerh.. 1.5on explained the request for a subuk*isi.on and variance at 1860 Shadywood Road in which properties are legally combined. Appiicant is requostiny to a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement to create a new building site and variances of lot area, lot width, and hardcover. Planning Commission recommended denial of this application. He noted that Mr. hall has notified staff and Council in his letter (attached to memo) that he would not be able to be present at this meeting but requests Council to act on his application in his absence. Mayor Butler asked Attorney Blatz her opinion regarding action on this application without applicant's presence. Attorney Blatz stated her recommendation would be to defer action until applicant and/or a representative for applicant is present. Based on Attorney Blatz's opinion, it was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, to table this application. #1013 STEVE KATAINEN 3850 SHORELINE DRIVE COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW Acting City Administrator Gerhardson explained the application for a camn.ercial site plan reveiw for proposed 801x84' structure to house furniture sales/storage operation. Fie noted that the furniture store use is not currently addressed in the B-5 zone, however the Planning Commission aas found the use to meet. the intent of the B-5 zoning district. Applicar:t h,is provided all necessary informaticti and has agreed to enter into a developers agreement to assure completion of certain site improvements. Steve Katainen was present for this matter. Zoning Adrti,-iatrator Mabusth nc:ted that the City Engineer and M.C.W.D. has confirmed that the property will have no drainage problems and are satisfied with the hydrolic information su:;mitted by applicant's engineer. Mr. Katainen indicated that the proposed building would be finished on all four sides with brick 6 wood siding, however the actual building drawings Ylave nut been finalized. H MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL, MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 1986 #1013 STEVE KATAINEN continued Because Council would like to see: the final plans before giving final approval, it was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, to grant preliminary approval of the Commercial Site Plan and upon receipt of the final plans for signage, lighting, landscaping, and exterior finish of building will grant final approval; and developers agreement to be provided before issuance of building permit. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 1986 JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE* SANDY BEACE PLACE RESOLUTION #1980 It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to adopt Resolution #1980 approving a Joint Use Dock License to Sandy Beach Place for the period of January 1, 1986 to December 31, 1986. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. ENGINEER'S REPORT: ORONO MWCC INTERCEPTOR UPDATE City Engineer Glenn Cock introduced Michael Lynch of Bonestroo & Associates who is working for the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission on the Metr ",ste 'nterceptor in Orono. Mr. Lynch reported that the infiltration/inflow s'c. y done in 1981.indicated that it would not be cost effect ve to eliminate the infiltration./inf low to extend the life of the interceptor system. At that time, Orono told MWCC to increase capacity or there would be a problem in the near future. He noted that. in April 1985 they reached capacit ., in which 15,000 gallons of sewage overflowed into Lake Minnetonka. At this point, he was hived by MWCC to study the system to determine the areas t -.t. were under capacity and present a preliminary d�,mign report. Upon approval of the report. by MWCC the7• anticipate improvements to begin in Spring 1987. Mr. Lynch explained the findings of the study which contained present and future daily wastewater flows, future flow summary, and lift station 6 interceptor analysis. He painted out that most of the lift stations were currently over their respective rated capacitic-s. He presented three alternatives to improve the system taking into consideration <.<rst efficiency and causing minimal disruption. S#.Caus• this project is only at the preliminary stage, Mayor sutler requester) Mr. I.,ynch to keep them informed on this matter. C] MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 1986 MWCC INTERCEPTOR continues.] tits stated that he would report hack when the project is at the preliminary desigr, stage. MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor Bu hid nothing to report dt this time. .BLE TV REPORT: There wns no C..3bl.e TV report at this time. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT- JOHN S. PILLSBURY, JR. 315 WOODHILL ROAD FINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #1937 Couacilmember Adams reportea that this item was previously presented to the Council at their March loth meeting in which Councilmembers Grabek and Hammerel were absent. lie stated that before the Council took action, he made them aware that he was a trustee of the Woodhil1 Country Club explaining that he felt there was not a conflict of interest involved because neither he or Woodhill Country C.Iub would benefit financially from approval of the subdivision. However, even though he felt there was no conflict of interest involved, he would abstain from voting if the other Council members felt otherwise. It was noted that this application would be delayed for a nonth in order to get a quorum vote. Due to the fact that. City Attorney Barrett, Mayor Butler and Councilmember Frahm agreed that there was no conflict of interest, the COL'nci 1 took action and voted 3-0 approving the Class I suL?_vlsion. Councilmember Adams stated that because there is now quorum present, he would abstain from voting if the Council felt it necessary to reconsider the motion, however he still felt there was i,o conflict of interest. involved. City Attorney Blatz stated that she c.3ncurred with Attorney Barrett.'s opinion that. there was no conflict of interest involved Niue to the fact that there was nothing in the su!xiivision resolution that stated that Pillsbury had to sell to Woodhill Coun)--y Club. After discussion, it was the Council's unanimous opinion that theme was no conflict of interest involved and felt. no reason fur Councilmember Adams to abstain from voting. In support. of this, Counci l decided to ratify the vote in this matter. It was moved by Counr_i lme*mber Frahm, peconded 11 Counci .lmembe,r Grabek, to adopt Resolution 0 1 9 ? Approving i Cla_,s I Subdivision for John S. Pillsbury, Jr. Motior, Ayes s, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO C JUNC_'L MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 1966 LAVE MINNETONKA USE 6 ACCESS* It was Roved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, the C:-ty Council accept the information relating to the Metro Council's Lake Minnetonka Task Force. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. FACILITIES ASSFSSMENT* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded y Councilmember Hammerel, that the City Council accept the assessmc_nt report for discussion at its April 28,. 1986 meeting. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. NA%'ARRE REDEVELOPMENT* It .,as moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember H.ammeiel, that the City Cou.ici l accept the information from the Administrator regardir• 'a varre Redevelopment and that the issue be discussc.l it the April. 28, 1986 Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 4, ,T-iys 0. ADMINISTRATOR'S ^COAL SETTING AND EVALUATION* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, the Council accept the various documents from the Administrator and that the 1986/87 Goal Setting together with CoL it discussion cf the Administrator's first year perforwance be placed on the agenda. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. SPECIAL EVENTS SUMMARY ORDINANCE It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to approve the summary ordinance for publicaation of Ordinance No. 5.25 and 6.08 Parades and Special Events. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. Councilmember Adams suggested some additional type of notification of this ordinance to realtors, Parade of Homes, etc. RESIGNATION - STEVE PEARSON* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to accept the resignation of Steve Pearson as patrol officer effective 3/18/86. Mot ion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. OWLOYMMIT - POLICE OFFICER* LARRT TONCNRCR It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to confirm the employment of harry Tomeheck an a Police Officer for the City of Orono effective April 10, 1986. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE RI,(:ULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APR1I. 14, 1986 3220 WATERTOWN ROAD * HAZARDOUS BUILDING PROCEEDINGS It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hanmerel, to direct staff to hold in ab yance hazardous building proceedings if a reasonable fix up schedule can be maintained by current owner. Motion, A;c,s 4, Nays 0. SHAVER/TEARSE RIGHT -OF --WAY PERMIT* RESOLUTION #1983 It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel., to adopt Resolution No. 198., grainting right-of-way permit to the Shaver/Tearse property application P.1.D.02-117-23 43 0011. Mot:,>n, Ayes 4, Nays 0. NATIONAL VOLUNTEER WEER* RESOLUTION 11981 It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, t1hat the City adopt Resolution No. i981 es;.ablishing April 20-27, 1986 as National Volunteer_ Week in the City of Orono together with proclamation thanking all the CAty's volunteers for their excellent efforts. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. CRYSTAL HAY SEWER PROJECT - CAUCUS RESOLUTION It was moved L)y Councilmember It seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, that the City .7 _.ounci1 acknowledge receipt. of the caucus resolution dated Marc` 18, 1986. Motion, Ayes 4, hays 0. DRIVEWAY - 1180 FTJ4WOOD - QUIT CLAIM DE$D* It was moved by Counci lmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, that Coun:.il approve the information as presented by staff for driveway easement at 1180 Elmwood Avenue. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. RNSIGNAT.ION* ASSISTANT CHIEF WINTON BURMASTER It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Counci l member H;-! mere l., that Counci l accept the resignation of Assistant Chief Winton, Burmaster, effective April 30, 1986. Motion, Ayes 4, rays 0.. TF.MPORAPY EMPIA)YMENT GOLF COURSE* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, tv employ temporary help at the Golf Course as follows: Doug Erickson, Fett.y'Itevens, Stephanie Sligo, Rty Peterson, El i tabeth Ga l lo, and Don Oas at hour ly pay ranging from $4.20 to $4.90 per hour. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. i? MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 1986 SPRING CLEAN UP - MAY 3RD AND MAY LOTH* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember H-Ammere 1, that the Orono annual Spring Clean Up be uled for Saturday, May 3rd ant: Saturday, May from 5:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays L TRAPPING PERMIT - 1700 SHORELINE DRIVE Coun.A.l reviewed the application for a limited legh-)ld trap (underwe',-er tranline) permit from Irwin Jacobs, 1.700 Shorel.L,ie Drive, for a period of one year. Mayor Butler questioned the time pericd of one year stating than the traps could bc potentially dangerous if forgotten about. Councilmember Grabek concurred with Mayor Butler stating that he felt this type of trap should be eliminated from populated areas as they can be dangerous to pets & children. Iie stated that there hav:? been complaints about traps being allowed previously and that they are not frequently checked. He noted that there should be consideration of signage and that there is alternative wethods to protect trees that should be addressed such as screening. He suggested approval. of the permit for 30 to 90 days and then reviewal. I was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to approve the Trap Permit for a period of 90 days only. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION* It was moved by Counciltrember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to accept City Administrator Bernhardson's Inforniatior; report. regarding Big Island, Comprehensive Storm water Management Plan, and Traffic Review of Hwy. 12/Willow Dr. Intersection. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. VANEY(-KNOUT BUILDING CORPORATION REQUEST An.sistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that a letter of request arrived during City Administrator Hernhardson's absence from VanEeckhout Building Corporation to connect to Long i•ake's sewer system. He noted that "e prepared the memo for Councils' information only and upon City Administrator Bernhardson's return a meeting will be set up with Mr. VanEeckhout for review. Mr. VanEeckhout was present for this matter and noted that the property in question is adjacent to the City of Long Lake and is a very "difficult site ti- work with". 13 Mayor But ler advised Mr. VanEeckhout to meet with the Ci ty Admi nistrator to rev iew it and the Counci 1 wi 11 discuss the matter further at the April 28th Council. meeting. EXECUTIVE SESSION 10:30 P.M. At this time, the Council and City Attorney Blatz entered into Executive Session. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT:* QUORUM INFORMATION LICENSES* B I I.1,S * It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to accept City Attorney Blatz's information report regarding Quorums & Effective of Absentions. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. It was roved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to approve the following licenses: Limited Firearms Use Permit - John Harold/Steven Panuska, 3140 Watertown Rd. Solicitation License Discount Flowers On -Sale Beer License - Orono Golf Course Special Events License - American Yout.i Hostels Minn. Ironman Ride, Bicycle Ride on April 27, 1986 Home Occupation License - Ben Meinhardt,3585Sixth Avenue North Garbage & Refuse Collector's License - Blackowiak b Son Woodlake Sanitary Service Inc. Septic System Installer License - Halstad Contracting McCari.y Water and Waste Ingleside Engineering & Construction Inc. Earl. W. Day & Sons Inc. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. It was moved by Counci lmembc:r Frahm, seconded by Counci lmember Hammerel, to approve payment of the Al 1 Funds Accounts and Liquor Store Accounts. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. ADJOURNKYNT 11:50 P.M. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, to adjourn the regular Orono Council meeting at 11:50 P.M. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. ATTEST: tot y Hall , City Clerk t 'J 14 Mary C. ut er, Mayor AGrNDA FOR COUNCIL MFETING SET FOR MONDAY, APRIL 14, 1986, 7:89 P.M. (*) Nsterisk items are considered to be rou.:ine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. ROLL. CALL 1. 7:99 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - YEAR XII URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS 2. CONSENT AGENDA* 3. Police officer -- Oath of office APR I11996 3a. Commendation -• Rosemary Rosedahl r � UEYY OF L NTj APkRO•VAL OF MINUTES ',teetino of March 10, 198G PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Maureen Be,.lows Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REF,-k" 5. #935 Wayzata Countr, Club, 20e Wayzata Boulevard - onditional Use Permit - Resolution * 6. #967 & #968 John B. A. Idstrom, 2580 Fox Street - Preliminary Subdivision Approval - Resolution #9S0 Ward Ferrell, 3405 Watertown Road - Variance - Second Review 8. #1A80 & #1009 Wtiliam WearT 2160 Wayzata Boulevard - Vafianee 9. #1804 Hang G1 Weiler 6 DOM KefnpfT 1425 & 1135 North Arm Drive - Final Sdbdivistor. -- k-aeldtlen *10. #1307 Carol Trapp, 470i Went Branch Road - Preliminary Subdivision Approval - Resolution 11. W 10 Duane H. Hall, 1860 Shadywuod Road - Preliminary Subdivision �2. #1013 Steve Katainen, 950 Shoreline Drive - Commercial Sits Plan Review *12a. 1986 Joint use Dock License - Sandy Beach Place - Resolution ENGINEER'S REPORT 12b. Or^no MWCC Interceptor Update MAYOR'S REPORT CABLE TV REPORT CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPOR' 13. John S. Pillsbury, Jr., 3.15 Woodhi 1 1 Road Resolution *1 Lake Minnetonka Use and Ac^ess L*_]„& Facilities As.^ssment * Navarre Redevelopment Administrator's Goal Setting and Evaluation Special Events Summary Ordinance Resignation - Police Officer Steve Pearson C*2Q,,� Fmployment - police Officer *21. 3220 Watertown Road "!'!s 9rene 6e4f Eedree Shaver/Tearse Right-of-way Permit National Volunteer Week - Resolution S -) Crystal Bay Sewer Project - 17au~us Resolution - Final Subdivision - AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, APRIL 14, 1986, 7:00 P.M. *26. Driveway - 1180 Elmwood - Quit Claim Deed *26a. lesignaton - Assistant Chief Winton Burmaster *26h. Temporary Employment Golf Course *26c. Spring Clean Up - May 3rd and May 10th 26d. Trapping Permit - 1700 Shoreline Drive *26e. Permit for 'Temporary Residence - 3507 Wayzata Boulevard- Resolution rl-T7--.D Admiri..trator's Information Big Island Comprehensive Storm Water Management VanEeckhout Building Corp - Request For Connection to Municipal Sewer - Information Only Traffic Report Highway 12 and Willow Drive REQUEST FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT *2�a. ,quorum Information LICENSES 8* BILLS (29*) ADJOURNMENT APR 141906 TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator i1� Ij"F VR01 FROil: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator DATE: April 8, 1986 SUW: P,.�blic Hearing - Community Development Block Grant Funds 1986 Allocation For 1986, the City will receive $19,764 from the Community Development Sleek Grant program Year XII. The above amount is $8,220 less than last year due to cut backs at the federal level. We are recommending that the Year XII monies be allocated to reducing the sanitary sewer assessments to the residents in Crystal Bay that qualify in the low to moderate income level. The monies will be available in August 1986. r REQUEST FOR CDBG FUNDING, Please indicate with an X which funds you are applying for: A. Year XII CDBG X X B. 1986 Discretionary _u n_Ts ' ma�tas���ma�=ms���am■amsmsmmmaamamamamma..■.ammamaaa=�a9ssmacas=;s:�am=a.a��:�a��=-_aa THIS SECTION WILL BE COMPLETED BY HENNEPIN COUNTY ER Status: / status Environmental ev ewSpecialist Tate - Project Number: / number-'- Financial nager Project Eligibility: / c a on Hennepin County mmmmmmmmsmmmmmmcmmmmmmmaaawas=====aaaaseam==::asamm=am=am====. .smssa==XXa A. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Community: r)r(:no 2. Project Name: �;ryst �l Bay &ewer improvements 3. Contact Person: ; :hardson B. PROJECT DATA 1. Funding Source: CDBG X Other 2. Is this a multi -year project? (Check one) yes X nc a. If yes, please indicate CDBG Year Started _ —, Project Number __-___, b. Total CDBG S programmed/expended since start of project $ 3. Location: Census Tract/s Attach map. City Wide 4. Description Describe the project in as much detail as rissible. Provide a statement of: 1) community need for project; 2) how project will address need and the anticipated results; 3) identify all components of the project in the order they will occur during Implementation (i.e. advinistration, construction, acquisition, consultant, public service subcontract). In 1985 the City of Orono constructed sewer. mains in the Crystal Bay area of Orono. The City sold General Obligation bonds to fund the project and levied assessments against the property. The Crystal Bay area needed the sanitary sewer due to the fact that the lots were small in size and septic tanks were failing. The construction of the project was completed in Ik,cember of '85. There are 10 pro- perty owners in this area that are L/M income persons. The L/M income persons in this project will suffer economic hardship if they were to pay off the assessments as amortized over a 15 year period. The first years levy on the tax statement is $615.67 principal and $1,062.08 interest.. 10 5. Identify which objective(s) of the Urban Hennepin County Statement of Objectives the project will address: assisting L/M income persons Implementation Schedule: For CDBG funds identify the major tasks you or your designee will perform during r h quarter .f the 18-month implementation period. For discretionary funds v* 12-month implementation schedule. Ird Quarter 1986 (July 1 to September 30) Disbursed immediatly to pay off assessments 4th Quarter 1966 (October 1 to December s,) 1st Quarter 1987 (January 1 to March 31) 2nd Quarter 1987 (April I to June 30) 3rd Quarter 1987 (July I to September 30) 4th Quarter 1987 (October 1 to December 31) 7. Budget Specify project costs for each component of the activity identified i No. 4 above. Componeit Costs Source of Funds Total project Budget Tctal CORG Budget 19,764_ City of ORONO ' t' t G RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APR 1 -1 191'2 GENERAL COMMENDATION ROSEMARY RuSEDAHL WHEREAS, on Sunday, February 23, 1986, an armed roobery was committed at the Snyders Drug Store in the City of Long Lake, and WHEREAS, through the efforts of Rosemary losedahI the suspect was apprehended and has been charged wi,:h aggravated robbery by the Hennepin County Attorney's office; :„d WHEREAS, Rosemary Rosedahl provided iolice with a description of the suspect and on February ,.14, 1186, when the suspect telephoned her, she engaged him it 3 telephon., conversation for approximately one and a half hours during which time Ncrthwestern Bell Security had ample time to trace the telephone call thereby enabling the coordination of law enforcement personnel. from Hennepin County, Orono Police, Ramsey County Sheriffs Department and New Brighton Police to apprehend the suspect; and WHEREAS, an alert and cooperative citizenry is essential to maintaining law and order; and WHEREAS the City of Orono wishes to commend and encourage the involvement of its residents i.i the overall protection of the community; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby highly commends Rosemary Rosedahl on the above stated actions and express their gratitude that Rosemary Rosedahl is willing to step foreward and be counted protecting the community and maintaining it as i safc place to live and conduct business. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held Apr,.! 14, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. MINUTES OF THE: REGULAR OPONO COUNCIL. MEETING HF:I,D MARCH 10, 1986 ATTENDANCE 7:00 PM � t` w e The Orono Council met on the above dace with the r®!lH �l �r'1 E��NG following members present: Mayor Butler, CouncilmemDers Adams and Frahm. Absent: Counci.lmembers Grabek and Hammerel.. The following represented the City staff: APR 1It1986 City Administrator Bernhardson, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, AEsistartt Zoning Administrator Gaffron, Building CITY OF ORONO Inspector Jacobs, and City Recorder Peterson. City Attorney Barrett was also present. CONSENT AGENDA* It was moved by Counci lmembr,r Frahr , seconded by Councilmember Adams, to approve the Consent Agenda* subject to removal of Item #21 (Planning Commission Appointment). Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. APPROVAL. OF MINUTES* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconde(-: by Councilmember Adams, to approve the Minutes of the February 24, 1986 Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Planning Commission Chairman Kelley was present. He stated that they would appreciate involvement by the community regarding the Highway 12 Corridor project, the more people that show up the better f.cr everyone. PUBLIC. COMMENTS At this time, Jerry Wheeler, 3399 Crystal Bay Rd., read a petition signed by approximately 100 signers --equesting the reappointment of William Sime to the Planning Commission. He noted that there was alot of disappointment voiced about the apparent lack of respect for the publics' desires by the City Council. He asked the City Council to explain why two other Planning Commission representatives were reaPi3inted and Mr. Sime was not. Mayor Butler stated that she has already stated for the record her feelings regarding the subject which are in the minutes from the December 9, 1985 Council meeting. Counc. nember Adams responded by stating that the Council was ready to make the two appointments made and were not ready to make the third appointment for reasons which are in the public record. Mr. Wheeler asked Councilmember Adams if that reason was because Mr. Sime was not a "team player"? MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 10, 1986 PUCt-IC COMMENTS continued Councilmember l,dams stated that was not the tcta1 of the reasons and stated he did not wish to debate this further in this forum. Mr. Wheeler asked the Council if they intend to boner this request to reappoint Bill Sime and/or expand the Planning Commission to include him. He stated that if the Councilmembers do not hono- `he citizens desires, they will have so•ne dif f icu lt� ith re-election this fall. Bill Anderson, 2 . 0 Shadywood Rd., noted that woi ld like to get a copy of the minutes regarding this subject. Duane Hall, 1860 Shadywood Rd., asked Mayor Butler .f she planned to share her views regarding the charges made by Mr. Sime in his letter to the Lc .ncil. Mayor Butler stated that she would not mike any comment regarding Mr. Sime's letter. Counci lmember F'rahn stated that Mr. Sime was asked to appear before the Council to discuss reappointmer:t, but he chose not to and rather wrote a letter regarding his feelings, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: #967 AND #968 JOHN B. IDSTROM 2580 FOX STREET PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION/ CONDITIONAL USE PEMIT Present for this matter Idstrom II and David M. ,ark Gronberg. were the applicant's, John B.A. Ostreim, and their surveyor, Citl Administrator Bernhardsom explained the request for a subdivision with variance for driveway to cross wetlands and a variance for frontage on a public street together with a request for a conditional use permit to fill on wetlands. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron referred to his memo on lot frontage requirements regarding public street versus non-public street. He noted that the subdivsion essentially meets the criteria save the technicality of the frontage requirements. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 10, 1986 #967 & #968 IDSTROM continued Assistant Zoning Administrator noted that the driveway has been reviewed by staff and finds no problem with the access location. He also noted the potential of a future third lot which w create problems for the applicant. iyor Butler stated that the resolution shoulC note the potential problems regarding future re -subdivision which Mould require the relocation of the access to properties off the private street. Mr. Idstrom stated he was not concerned with a third lot at this time and would deal with that problem in the future if it arc.se. Councilmember Aean!: stated he ` ind no problem with the proposed subdivision of two lc only but would if there were three. It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, directing staff to draft a resolution with the appropriate variance relating the frontage and specifying that this is approval of two lots noting the future problems of a third lot, to be presented before final approval at the March 24, 1986 Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. #990 WARD FERRF 3405, 3411, 341t� weATERTOWN ROAD VARIANCE Ward Ferrell was present for this matter along with his attorney, Leroy Haglund. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a variances on two existing lots, which are in the 2 acre zone and are substandard under the current code. He stated that this was presented last May as a zoning appeal. He noted that a- licant has had septic site testing done and hr+s pro._sed acceptable primary and alternate sites. Mr. Haglund stated that. applicant's dream was to build a house on one of these lots and was platted as such many years ago. He submitted a petition signed by the neighbors stating they have no objections to this proposal. He also submitted aerial photos to sho. that the applicant's proposal would not, be inco 'stant with the area. 3 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 10, 1986 #990 FERRELL continued Mayor Butler explained the problems that are involved in this application and that the reason this area was rezoned in 1974 to 2 acre lots was the problem with septic system overcrowding and failure on 1 acre lots. She noted that other similar applications have been denied for this same reason and Council would be setting a precedent by approving this. Mr. Haglund stated that this situation is unique and that properly installed septic systems do not fail. Councilmember Adams stated that problems are showing up with septic systems in 1 acre areas. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the history of the zoning code from 1950 to present. He noted the similar request by Alden Anderson in 1981 which set a precedent for denial in these cases. Mr. Haglund stated . ,re there is no proof of setting a precedent by approving this because of the unique situation. Mr. Ferrell stated that the present zoning code would prevent subdivision requests of 2 acre parcels, but he has already subdivided his property, upon the request of the City. Mayor Butler stated that she felt the entire Council should be present to make a decision on this application. Mr. Ferrell stated that the Council has a moral obligation to honor previous councils' actions. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to table this application until the April 14, 1986 Council meeting for the presence of the entire Council. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. #1006 CHRIS 6 DALB PALM 1710 SBADTWOOD ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION # 1! 36 City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for hardcover variances to construct a home addition and attached garage. The proposed hardcovers increases are from 17.5% to 18.2% in the 0-75' zone,- the proposal shows a decrease from 27.3% to 26.F% in the 75-250' zone, but on staff's recommeijdation ,,,)r safety reasons, a back-up apron should be included, so the proposed hardcover would be increased to 29.0%. 4 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII, MEETING HELD MARCH IL, 1986 #1006 PALM continued Henry Mean Lindner, Builder & Agent for the applicant, was present for this matter. Ile explained a proposed layout of the house interior. In order to help alleviate the concerns and amount of hardcover, Mr. Lindner presented s,:::ples of c_,rating material. that could potentially be used for the sidewalk and driveway and not be considered hardcover. He noted that they axe also open to concrete runner pads for driveway use. Councilmember Frahm stated that he felt strongly regarding no additional hardcover being allowed in the 0-75' zone. Mr. Lindner stated that he felt he could maintain the ex'sLing hardcover in the 0-75' with little or no increase .in the 75-250' zone. Mayor Butler stated that she would be willing *-o eliminate adding in the necessary back-up apron s hardcover for safety factor. After further discussion, it was determined that the back-up apron must be included in the hardcover calculations. It was moved by Mayor Butler, Adams, to adopt Resolution following amendments: a) existing hardcover in 17.5% b) increased hardcover in 29.0%. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. seconded by Councilmember #1936, subject to the 0-75' be maintained at 75-250' shall not exceed #1007 ROBERT i CAROL TRAPP 4701 IIEST BRANCH ROAD PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION City Administrator bernhardson explained the request for a preliminary subdivision which meets all the standards. He noted that it fronts on the dedicated public right- of-way, but that is not developed as yet, it will be accessing on west Branch, and should be required to access on Highview Lane should that giver be developed. Carol Trapp was prf:,E-nt for this matter. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to approve the preliminary subdivision subject to staffs recommendation and subject to requiring access on Highview Lane if ever developed, Motion, Ayes 3, Nay 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 10, 1986 #1008 JOHN S. PILLSBURY, JR. 315 WOODHILL ROAD FINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #1937 Robert Hartfiel was present representing John S. Pillsbury, Jr. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for final approval of a Class I subdivision which consisted of splitting a 42 acre parcel into two parcels; larger parcel sold to Woodhill Country Club and an eight acre parcel to be sold off separately. He noted that the 8 acre lot would be served by an existing driveway that comes off Woodhill Rd. and would require a street front variance. Councilmember Adams questioned whether he should step down fron. the Council in this matter due to the fact that he is an elected Board of Directors Trustee for Woodhill Country Club, however he does not feel there is a particular conflict. Attorney Barrett stated he could not give a legal opinion at this time but does not see an absolute impediment with Councilmember Adams voting. Mayor Butler and Councilmember Frahm stated they had no objections to Councilmember Adams remaining on the Council for this matter and saw no reason to delay it further. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Mayor Butler, to adopt Resolution. #1937 approving a Class I Subdivision for John S. Pillsbury, Jr. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. #993 TOKKA TRANSMISSION 1960 SHORELINE DRIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Craig Olson, owner of Tonka Transmission, was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernharu. n explained the application request for modification of original permit a)increase of parking from 10 stalls to 17 stalls b) dispensing of gasoline to limited amount of customers. Zoning Administrator Mabu6th noted that at the November Planning Commission meeting, two adjacent neighbors were present with major concerns, however she felt their major objections centered on the upkeep of the property rather than the use. 6 MINUTi - OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD MARCH 10, 1986 #993 TONKA 1;'.1.ISMISSION continued Zonina Administrator Mabusth stated that staf felt that the proposal was not really an intensif ica, . on of use but merely reflected the real use that was approved in 1983. Staff recommends approval of 14 par::ng stalls subject to a)applicant being prepared to be ticketed when in violation, and b)general. landscaping and upgrade of the property being made. Mayor Butler suggested closing off the County Rd. 15 access to obtain more parking stalls. Craig Olson stated it was possible, but an ingress and egress is important where towing is concerned. Mayor Butler noted on the application within the Description of Request, "allow limited number of cars for sale on premises". She stated that the site is too limited and she would not be in favor of that type of use. Councilmember Frahm stated that there has always been a problem with disorganized parking around the pump area, and felt that removal/relocation of the pump would solve this problem. Building Inspector. Jacobs stated he would have to review the suggested relocation of the pumps to the side of the building. It was noted that there is the potential of 1.8 parking stalls if the pumps were removed/relocated. Mr. Olson asked the Counci 1 if he were to removed the pumps and tanks to eliminate gas dispensing, would there be a problem to revert back to a service station if he were to sell. the property. Council indicated that they had no problem with approving that but. they could not guarantee future councils' decisions. Bas(d on these suggestions, it was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Counc4lmember Adams, to table this application antil the March 24th Council meeting for applicant to propose an alt2rnat.ive plan. Motion, Ayes 3, nays 0. IiAT08; • B REPORT: Mayor Butler had r.othi,,g to report this time and she turned the floor over tc Cni,nciImember Adams. h MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 10, 1986 MAYOR'S REPORT continued Councilmember Adams reported on the new Dakota Rai 1 which to Hutchinson line that runs that scenic excursions and of are being made. He noted tl regarding the City and felt the project. CABLE TV REPORT: that he attended a meeting has purchased the Wayzata through Orono. He stated ier recreational proposals tat there may be concerns someone should be policing City Administrator Bernhardson stated that them- are some bad sections of railroad to be concerned about but that some sections were replaced recently. He stated that staff will review and report back in a month. There was no Cal -)lc, TV Report at this time. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: BIG ISLAND HAZARDOUS BUILDING PROCEEDIVGS RESOLUTIONS #1942 THROUGR #1975 City Administrator Bernhardson recapped this matter stating that the '85 Legislature re-established the Big Island Board of Governers. The Board is composed of representatives from four. different veterans organizations: American Legion, VFW, Disabled Veterans, and Order of the Purple Heart (2 representatives each). Title was given to the Big Island Board of Governers in December and the State has apparently tendered them monies (approximately $25,000-$30,000) with a stipulation. Additionally, Orono has been in the process of commencing hazardous building proceedings against all the buildings on the island. Back in August, Mr. Jim Lund, base:., on the institution of the Board, to work together or, the removal of just the worst buildings which for the most part has been done. Staff recommends that Council pass the hazardous building proceedings at this meeting and that the staff will hold them in abeyance from filing with the courts for a period of 30 clays in hopes of receiving tLe appropriate time table from the Big Island Board of Governers and if adequate progress is not made, staff will then f i le them with the court. It was noted that a conditional use would also be required and recommended that the Board of Governors make application. Additionally, City Administrator Bernhardson noted that Roy's Bait of Excelsior has been storing approximately 30-35 fish houses on the island which is in violation of zoning code and hardcover requirements; and is :a fire hazard. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 10, 1986 BIG ISLAND continued Representing the Big Island Board of Governors was: Stuart H. Gorney, Donald M. Miller, Leonard A. Carlton, and Ken Erickson. Also present was Joe Backes, a Big Island property owner. Dc,n Miller, acting as spokesman for the Big Island Board of Governors, explained the history and problems in support of keeping and upgrading the Veterans Camp. He stated that since the Big Island Board of Governors was Lormed, the only thing they have been able to accomplish to this short time is having an architectual design drafted. He felt that the City should allow them a year to aolve this problem. Mayor Butler noted that the City's interest represents a safe camping environment for all con-erned. She stated that she has no problem allowing a year to work this out, but she wants a plan with a timetable presented a.ic. assurances that it is going to be carried out. Regarding making application for a conditional use permit, the Board representative(s) stated they will apply within 10 days for the appropriate permit for overnight camping for the work crews only for the year of 1986. City Administrator Bernhardson noted a couple of major concerns if the Veterans Camp were to be rebuilt and operated: 1. The density of the number of buildings in accordance with the standards. 2. Adequate water supply and septic system. 3. Storage of fish houses to be eliminated. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, directing the removal of the fish houses from Big Island by May 15, 1986. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. it wary moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, directing staff to secure from the Board of Governors the Conditional Use Permit application no later than March 28, 1986, if this is not submitted to commence with the Hazardous Building proceedings; ar.d that the Board of Governors will submit a long range plan by December 31, i986. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. 4 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 10, 1986 BIG ISLAND continued. It was moved by Mayor. Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolutions #1942 through #1975 and approve the filing of the Hazardous Building proceedings n : earlier than April 15, 1986. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. ,Joe Backus suggested that the Council do a personal tour of the island. HASARDGu3 BUILDING PROCEEDINGS - RESOLOTIONS #1938 i #1939 It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Mayor Butler, to adopt Resclutions #1938 & #1939 Ordering Abatement of Hazardous Building Action at: Res. #1938 - 1385 Cherry Place Res. #1939 - 3220 Watertown Road Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. LIQUOR STORE OPERATIONS - 1985 City Administrator Bernhardson reported that he underestimated the amo-.int of loss due to higher than anticipated expenses, final statement indicating a loss in 1985 of $8,600. He reported that to -date the projected estimates are ahead of targets for 1986. First quarter report. to be reviewed and submitted at the end of April or first May meeting. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Mayor Butler, that the Council adopt the information presented for the Liquor Store Operation 1985 and direct staff to closely monitor the operation. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. CASCO CIRCLE PARE/SNONMOBILES Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson reported that the interested party was not in attendance but did express her concern that this is a "worthwhile" matter. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Mayor Butler, that the Council authorize posing of the sign, prohibiting snowmobile activity in Casco Circle Park, as noted at the location and that Police undertake reasonable ef`orts to enforce the ordinance currently contained in Grano codes. Motion, Aye3 3, Nays 0. HEALTH INSURANCE - RETIREES AND PERMANENTLY DISABLED R39SOLOTION # 1940 It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Mayor Butler, that the City Council adopt Resoluti-ri #1.940 relating to continuation of health insurance benefits for persons who leave employment with the City of Orono. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays O. ] () MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HP.I.D MARCH 10, 1986 SPECIAL EVENTS• ORDINANCE 122 SECOND SERIES It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, that the City Council adopt Ordinance #22 Second Series as amendmments to Ordinance Numbers 5.25 and 6.08. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. WOLSFELD fii00DS* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, that Council direct staff to write a letter supporting location of a caretaker in the location most advantageous for that person to monitor activities in and around Wolsfeld Woods. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. 1986 POLICE/:,ELS CONTRACT* It was moved bl Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, that the City Council accept the settlement terms for 19F6 contract between the City of Orono and Law Enforcement Labor Services. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. 1986 HEALTH CONTRIBUTION* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to adjust the amount for basic life insurance and for family health insurance coverage from $146 per month to $151 per month retroactive to January 1, 1986. Motion, Ay•^s 3, Nays 0. CATASTROPHIC SICK LEAVE BANK* It was moved by CouncilmemLer Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, that the Council amended the policy for sick leave to include a bank for accrual of up to 320 additional hours (fo.r use in catastrophic instances) when a person amasses more than 960 hours and that staff prepare the appropriate amendment to the Administrati— a and Personnel Policy effective January 1, 1986. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. STUBBS BAY SCHOOL It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, that the City Council express its gratitude to Ka*herine Cram for her off of Stubbs Bay School, but given the fact that the C need to move together with the expense of fixing up aA the fact that the City does not have a strong use for it, that the City respectfully decline the offer. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. it MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII, MEETING MARCH 10, 1986 METRO COUNCIL'S LAKE MINNETONKA TASK FORCE LAKE ACCESS Given the fact that the Council's stance is the same regarding this matter, it was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams , that the City Council direct the City Administrator to deliver their concerns on the draft report of Metro Council as it relates to Lake Minnetonka use and access. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENT Councilmember Frahm suggested that the Council make one more offer to Mr. William Sime asking him to meet with the Council to discuss re -appointment. He noted that he personally had no qualms regarding his actions as a Planning Commission member. Counc.:lmember Adams stated that the offer already has been made to Mr. Sime and felt there was no purpose in re -extending that offer. Mayor Butler concurred that there was no purpose in prolonging this matter further. It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Mayor Butler., that. Maureen Bellows be appointed to the Planning Commission vacancy. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. IRVING ENGLISH PROBATION* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, that Chip English be approved as having com.pleLed probation as of March 10, 1986. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. JOINT US! DOCK/FOREST ARMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION* RESOLUTION i1941 It was moved by Counci.lmeml,er Frahm, seconded by Cour:.cilmember Adams, that. '!,e City Council adopt Resolution #1941 to issue a .j )int Use Dock License to Forest Arms Country Club Addition Homeowners Association subject to the conditions noted for the period of January 1, 1986 to December 31, 1986. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. YRAR XII C.D.B.G. FUNDS* - PUBLIC BEARING MARCH 24, 1986 It was moved by "OLnci lmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, that Council approve setting of a Public Hearing for Year XII of the Community Development Block Grant Program for . -)ri 1 14, 1986 at 7:00 PM. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. 12 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 10, 1966 C.D.B.G. FUNDS* continued (NOTE: At the end of the Council. meeting, it was discovered that there would be a lack of a quorum present for the March24th meeting, therefore the Public Hearing was rescheduled and notice to be republished for April 14, 1986.) C.D.B.G. SEWER ASSESSlM W* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, that the Orono City Council concur in the distribution of funds as outlined. Motion, ayes 3, Nays 0. OWLOYMENT/TEMPORARY PART TIME* - JAMIR BOSMA It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, that Council concur in the employment of Jamie Bosma for the period of time February 28 through June 1, 1986, at a rate of $6.00 per hour. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. RESIGNATION/EMPLOYMENT LIQUOR STORE* - JAMES KRUEGER/DON ROLF It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, that the Council concur in the employment of Jim Krueger as of March 12, 1986 at a rate of $4.50 per hour, and to accept the resignation of Don Rolf effective March 1, 1986. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, that the City Council accept City Administrator Bernhardson's information report regarding: Long r e Library, Crystal Bay Appraisal Progress, Adminis _ator's Goal Settliig, Ulrich;Bohn's Point Road, Gregory/Tanager Lake, and Deering Island. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. CITY ATTORXZY'S REPORT: City Attorney Barrett had nothing to report at this time. LICIMRS* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to approve the following licenses: Sic i ''+ 1 Event - Easy Race VI, sponsored try Wayzata k Ban & Trust and Minnetonka State Bank on April 27, 1906. Commercial Kennel _License - D. Brian 6 Cathy L. Fu�cr,r'i"�ie Dog House-Baardinq Kennel, Inc., 3505 Wayzata B1:1d. 13 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 10, 1986 LICENSES* continued BILLS* Residential Kennel •,nse - Duane W. Anderson, 4220 cFlppewa Lane Septic System Installers License - Sullivan's -- —----------------- Services, Inc. Cigarette License - Patric G. Walker, Minnetonka Fish inq Center, 3554 Shoreline Dr. Moti.on, Ayes 3, Nays 0. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, that the City Council approve payment of the All Funds Accounts and Liquor Store Accounts. Motion, Ayes 3, days 0. ADJOURNIUM 10:22 PM It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Mayor Butler, to adjourn the regular Council meeting at 10:22 PM. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Ha lin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor 14 TO: C... -.Icil FWAA: Michael- P. Gaffion DATE: April 10, 1986 APP,111986 CITY OF Cliti SUBJ: #935, Wayzata Country Club, 200 W. Wayzata Blvd - CUP - Resolution NOTE: Application #935 covers all work currently proposec' f Wayza,-a Country Club except for a) dredging of an existing designated wetland on hole #6 and b) creation of a new pond on hole #12: these two items will be covered under a separate application #1012 which is oi, ho16 until surveying/design work is complete. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Propert,e owners list. D - Site plan showing project locations E - Survey showing proposed shelter structi•r.e location F - Planning Commission minutes 7-15-85 G - Council minutes 1-27-•86 I-1 - Staff nemo 1-23-66 Per Council actin:, of 1-27-86, staff has reviewed the improvement projects prop<.�sed 'uy the Wayzata Country Club for the next few years. :len Coo} and I met with Grounds Superintendent, Jim Lindblad, on March 5, 1985, and staff would make the following recommendations: 1) Projects to be completed in 1986 or later years for which staff recommends approval with no further design detail or review: a) F tend rear of tee #4: raise an area 30' x 50' an average of 6"; approximately 30 cubic yards of fill, high ground, no effect on watershed. b) Hole 011 - construct low mounds at left side of fairway - 3'-5' high - not a wetland area, will not affect drainage - approximately 75 cubic yards of fill. c) Hole #13 - Fill in existing bunker; approximately 20 cubic yards of fill, no eff ct on drainage. d) 12'7 x 1517 shelter- structure to be constructed just east of tee #12 - minor grading, if any. No effect on drainage or watershed - proposed to be screened from road. Proposed location exceeds the minumum 50' setback required per 10.20 Subd 3(c) for an accessory structure at a Country Club. Zoning File #935 Wayzata Country Club Page 2 of 2 2) Project completed 1985 for which staff recommends after - the -fact approval with no further design information: pond on 5th fairway - not a desig. wetland - 25' x 75' x 5' deep - slopes ok - 350 cubic yards excavated. 3) Projects completed or underway in 1986 which were approved by Council 1-27-86 and for which a grading permit haF ready been issued: j) Rebuild bunkers on hole #8; approximately 1000 cubic yards of fill, all on high ground. b) Extend tee #17; approximately 370 cubic yards of fill, all on high ground. 4) Projects to be reviewed under application #1012: a) Pond on hole #6 - this is a designated wetland. Prop -sal is to remove 30 years accumulation of silt and debris, leaves, muck, etc. - no plans to widen or to change bank slopes - spoil site is of some concern and will need some protection - staff is requiring a series cf surveyed cross - sections (2 or 3) to show (_xactly what is proposed - Lindblad notes Me ombs Knutson will likely do the survey/design work. b) Pond to be created on hole #12. - this is not a designated wetland - pond is proposed to be approximately 100' diameter, 3-5' d-ep, located adjscent to (but not contiguous with) the pond created in 1981. Prior to that, this entire area was fairway and bunkers (sand trap). Will remove approximately 1200 cubic yards of fill. - spoil site not determined - oil provably a Glencoe silty clay loam. This is a b,,rder to a collection area, probably will have little impact on qua:,ity of water leaving watershed, perhaps will ever, increase storage... Based on the above reco- ndations, staff recommends approval of a conditional use pc_, it for items 1 (a-d), 2 and 3 (a-b', per the attached resolution, which requires that the proper building permit (for the shelter) and the proper grading permit. (for each subsequent year's projects) be obtained prior to commencement of construction. We anticipate that application #1012 for work in the 2 ponds will be presented to the Plarning Commission for initial review in May or June. 2 07 [g@N0WJ[N , MAY JAMES LtNDBLAD, CGCS , �' 2 9 1935 Golf Course Superintendent TY OF ORONO Wayzata Country Club _ — 200 West Wayzata Blvd. RESIDENCE: -- Wayzata, Minn. 55391 200 Weel Wayzata Blvd — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- -- —------ 612/473-6955 Wnyzala, Mean 55391 612 473.6420 Site Address ;L00 WF S-T vw A`(z(%TA V,1-yD 6V1"-YZATt41 0)/A;P 5539/ Property Identification Number (P. I . D.) Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to applicati.cn if not included on required survey. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Jim ►. jrepjb1.Ap1 Craevn,os svP'I , Name W AY Z AT C ou oiTaY CLUB Phone N n 3 - 109 SS Mailing Address Vi G x 151 . UV A-/ Z,NT.A Irn N oo 5 -S 0 # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- OWNER Name W A-tZA-TA O u kn(LN CL176 Phone 4 4 3- L9 5s, Mailing Address 80)'% S1 1V A`rL,-krA I rh f N u 53 3'� 1 Date Property Acquired J AN�Aati 19 5ja (month/year) I (dc) (do not; also own the adjacent p,-rcels of land. -------------------------------------------- -------'----------------------- FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS $1.00.00 a) Residential accessory Use $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $1.50.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bl.dg $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use a G $200.00 f) Land Alteration (grading, filling) PRD/PID - see fee schedule Other Applications $250.00 Vacation }} t �JI $250.00 Rezoning „ $200.00 AppealsM(290 ' ` � _^_` Other - ser fee schedule , iily PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present `boning District Present Use of Property Residential IV Other (specify) [ate --------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: r3i C p 014=d 1 o0'x urn• -------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS f " Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603Government Center 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#t10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. Construction plans, if applicable. 6. Plat Map. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. --•------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agreestopayall fees and/orunusualexpenses incurred in review or this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true a -id correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant Is signature d� W��i, -tbc to 5 yp '? a t OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this appli-ation and further authorises .reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and vlrificatlbn,oi is request r ` - ' S 3 �rx' Owner's sits 3e . Date -----n•---------------.----------------------------------------------------- Applicant must.heve all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. S. //Z, SEC. 36, T. 118t R. 23 3c 'm . im - M. IV OI COD Ajkx� - vast m Property gwncrb List Zoning File #935 36-118-23 34 0008 11. Norman Nafstad 8200 Vincent Avenue No. Minneapolis,MN 55444 36-118-23 34 0010 ,aid & June Swanson 9 WEst 58th Street ►.—neapolis, MN 55424 36-118-23 31 0013 Donald Wildman 280 Wakefield Road Wayzata, MN 55391 36-118-23 31 0014 Francis T. Biermeier 17135 28th Avenue North Plymouth,MN 55447 36-118-23 41 0014 Clifford S. Asmhun Jr. 117 Chevy Chase Drivc Wayzata,MN 55391 36-118-23 41 0013 Gene Zaske 115 Chevy Chase Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 36-118-23 34 0015 36-118-23 31 0015 36-118-23 41 0012 Jerry Alstead C. Wayne & Angie Leneave eaaid(, Nelson 440 Old Long Lake Road 2725 Vagabond Lane 113 Chevy Chase Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Minneapolis, MN 55447 Wayzata,MN 55391 36-118-23 33 0011 36-118-23 41 0021 36-118-23 41 0011 David & Jill Robers Richard G. WElls Thomas L. Curry 30 Myrtlewood Road 131 Chevy Chase Drive ill Chevy Chase Drive Wayzata , MN 55391 Wayzata,MN 55391 Wayzata,MN 55391 36-118-23 33 0010 36-118-23 41 0020 36-118-23 44 0009 Verena L. Pearson Robert & Annette Langford Gerald Androli 20 Myrtlewood 129 Chevy Chase Road 100 Ferndale Green W#yzata MN 55391 Wayzata, MN 55391 Wayzata, KN 55391 36-118-23 33 0009 36-11.8-23 41 0019 36-118-23 44 0010 James & Mary Matteson Jeffrey Jacobsen Charles Hulse 10 Myrtlewood Road 127 Chevy Chase Drive 95 Ferndale Green Wayzata, MN 55391 Wayzata, MN 55391 Wayzata,MN 55391 36-118-23 31 0008/7 :,6-118-23 0018 36-118-23 44 0011 Dale K. Warner Imogene M )gers John & Roxanne Powers 375 Wakefield Road 125 Chevy nase Drive 85 Ferndale Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Wayzata, MN 55391 Wc,,,zata, MN 55391 36-118-23 31 0010 36-118-23 41 0017 36-11.8-23 44 0014 John T. Thornton Bradford & Janie Blankenship William Mueller 220 Wakefield Road 123 Chevy Chase Drive So. 55 Ferndale Green Wayzata, KN 55391 Wayzata,MN 55391 Wayzata, MN 55391 36-118-23 31 0011 36-118-23 41 0016 36-118-23 14 0011 William Ferril Herbert Abramson Leopold Hauser III 240 Wakefield Road 121 Chevy Chase Drive 475 North Ferndale Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Wayzata, MN 55391 Wayzata,14N 1:5391 36-1 3-23 31 0012 1 36-118-23 41 0015 36-118-23 14 0008 Paul Baszuki Jeffrey Wujek £d & Marlys Cohen 519 North Ferndale Rd 250 Wakefield Road 119 Chevy Chase Drive Wayzata,MN 55391 Wayzata, MN 55391 Wayzata, MN 55391 Property Owners List Cont. Zoning file #935 36-118-23 13 0006 36-118-23 13 0009 Timothy M. O'Connor Edward L.'Delanhanty 505 North Ferndale 511 No. Ferndale Road Wayzata,MN 55391 Wayzata, MN 55391 36-118-23 13 0007 36-118-23 24 0004 Klaus P. Becker Bruce B. Dayton 507 North Ferndale Road 990 Old Long Lake Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Wayzata, MN 55391 36-118-23 13 0008 Yvonne C. Cooke 509 No. Ferndale Road Wayzata,MN 55391 36-118-23 24 0007 F.obert Benson Jr. 430 Wakefield Road Wayzata, MN 55391 36-118-23 14 0007 11. Glendon Johnson 517 No. Ferndale Road Wayzata, MN 55391 36-118-23 14 0006 Andrew & Mary Smith 515 No. Ferndale Road Wayzata,MN 55391 36-118-23 13 0001 Anne B. McCourt 508 North McCa(�den Place Los Angeles, CA 90004 1 WYZATA'&qTRY CUB A�rl V 11 ! �• `' \ J� ` .00 ^ 1 ��• \ J 001, o' � a ' PRoPDS�D CouNTR-Y (A ofx � fn s0 ' tf MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 15, 1985. PAGE 9 #934 ROBERT TSCNIDA Goetten stated that the Tschidas are neighbors and she finds no problems with this proposal. McDonald moved, Goetten seconded to recommend ap- proval for a variance to enclose a small entryway for Robert Tschida, 1300 Fox Street based on the following findings: 1. The entryway enclosure will create a more energy -efficient home. 2. The entryway enclosure will likely not affect any neighbor's views, etc. 3. Neither Fox Street or Hanlon Avenue are deve- loped roads at this location, and the applicant has maintained the Fox Street right-of-way as yard area for a number of years, hence the proposed entryway gives ' Ae appearance of being setl---,K nearly 60' from the edge of the yard. Motion, Ayes (4), Nayes (0). #935 AYZATA COUNTRY CLUB 0 YZATA BLVD. WEST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 9:25 - 9:35 PM Jim Lindbl d, Grounds Superintendent, wa. present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was no one present from the public. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaff ron explained this application is regarding the pond that was constructed last winter. It was suggested to the applicant to bring in an overall landscape plan for a short review and for overall approval. of small projects. The pond constructed is approximately 25x75' and approximately 5 feet deep. The bank slopes are about 3:1 to 4:1. Lindblad note(] that when hey dug the pond on Highway 12 foi:r years ago, they were brought before the I'lannina Commission at that time and were told that thev had a grandfather claise that exists from the day rf construction back in 1956. A permit would not be required each time some dirt war.; moved. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HE•:LD JULY 15, 1.985. PAGE 10 #935 WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that the Planning Commission in 1981 recommended that this be handled on a staff basis. Lindb' ad stated that the City now has record of the Country Cluts :tong range plan, so .if they apply on a regular basis that should satisfy everyone involved. Assistant Zoninj *rator Gaffron noted that the City Engineer reviewed this plan and any recommendaticn toi -roval should be based on his approval. This is the final pond on this overall plan. The other items -)n the plan are extending of tees, changing of sand traps, tree planting and some berms going in. Zoning vdministrator. Mabusth stated that they must come in eri3 get a land alteration permit - thus we would be .ble to monitor the projects. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron clarified that the applicant would come in once a year and be given an overall permit for that years projects - then tYcry woLldn't have to come in for each small project. Chairman Kelley questicned whether the ponds were designated wetlands and whether the ponds wer, chemically treated. Lindblad explained that the ponds are not being treated because they dump into Lake Minnetonka. They are decorative po.ids. Goetten moved, i,,ylor seconded to recommend approval for the conditional use permit for the Wayzata Country Club subject to the following conditions: 1. To construct a pond adjacent to the 5th fairway. 2. To grant approval for future projects on a yearly basis. 3. To notify staff at the beginning of 1986 and each year thereafter, of pending projects and if staff deems it so necessary, applicant must ao before the Planning Commission for review. Motion, Ayes (4), Naye:'s (0). MINUTES OF THE. REGULh.:; v-M1NO COUNCIL, MEETING HELD JANUARY 27, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION INTERVIEWS continued It was moved by Councilmember HammereI, seconded by Ma,,or Butler, that the Council having interviewed the above listed candidates will take it under advisement and table the issue of appointment until the February 10, 1986 meeting. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. CONSENT AGENDA* It was moved by Mayor Butle-, seconded by Councilmember Adams to approve the Cor.;Ent Agenda* subject to removal of Item #27 (Administrator's Information). Motion, Ayes. 5, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by Mayor Butler, sec -)nded b- Councilmember Adams, to approve the Minutes of the J -ary 13, 1986 Council meeting as submitted. Motion, A 5, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS There were no comments from the Park Commission at this time. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT- RESIDEIITIAL DOCK LIMITATIOi; * It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to accept the information provided by staff regarding 1,MCD's rmended ordinance on residential dock limitations. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no cornm�nts from the public at this time. 3V)K G ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: BUi '.DING i ZONING DEVARTVENT A1111UAL REPORT - 1985 Zoning Administrator. Mahusth reviewed the Building & Zoning Department's 1985 Annual report with the Council. C= ;4#SzSW-T%W-1r5ZATA YZATA COUNTRY CLUB BOULEVARD MBST CONDITIOMAL USE PERMIT City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for an after -the -fact conditional use permit for creation of a pond and conditional use permit for proposed work to be done in 11)36. A-sist.3nt 7,o<<inq Administrator Gaffron reviewed, per his memo dated Jan,_ 23, 1986, the series of events since 1981 that. 1 e e Wayzata Country C 1 ub's Gr<-)unds SlrperintendatA, believe that grading/excavating projects did not require City approval. He reviewed staff's recommendations regarding various earth moving projects. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR OROI J COUNCIL. MI:,-.TING I1F.1.D JANUARY 27, 1986 l935 WAYZATA COUKTRY CLUB continued Representinq the Wayzata Country Club was Don Hennings. He noted that the Grounds Superintendant felt positive that they had the verbal. approval to proceed with the plans as presented back in 1981. It fas moved by Councilmember H, riierel, seconded by Mayor Butler, to grant conceptual approval to the Wayzata Country Club for two earth -moving projects as outlined in staff's recommendations, but directing the Country Club to submit the pond work in a separate conditional use permit. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. i987 ROBERT J. BAUMAN 1040 TONICAWA ROAD VARIANCR - SECOND REVIEW RESOT `" 7ON # 1914 Mr. & b. s. Robert J. Bagman were present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed the status of items pending from the .ianuary 13th Council meeting ,Ahict, were: 1) staff to review the "average setback" concept. 2) applicant to consider an alternative site locution, which he has submitted a letter regarding this. 3) st.af f to contact neighbors to ensure that they ace aware of the ongoing review process, which Asst. Zoning Administrator Gaffron has done. Assistan* oning Administrator Gaffron explained ind showed se. al different ways to :.nterpret the "average setback" c ,kept whi:711, inclu:ied the variations of the ".line of sight" average setback rule. It was moved by Councilmember Grabrk, ,7,. nded by Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolutior : approving the variance request to construct an ir., ool based on the "a verrge setback" nterpretation _aig. line method) as written in the proposed resolution; and amending the resolution to include under Findings the hardsh;ps of topcgraphl and shoreline irrc-gul.arity. Motion. Ayes 5, Nays 0. City Administrator Bernhardson stated that staff would re -ward the code to rf f lect the intent of the straight line method of determining the average setback and submit it at. the February Plannino ')mmission me:,ting. To: Oro► iv!--- ii)ers From: Michael P. Gaftron, Assistant Zoning Administrator Date: January 23, 1986 Subject: #935 Wayzata Country Cluh - Conditional Use Permit - First Review Application - 1) After -the -fact. Conditional Use Permit for creation of a pone] on 5th fairway; and 2) Conditional Use Permit for propo..�i work to be done in 1986: a. extend 17th tee b. rebuild bunkers around 8th green C. dredge sediment from pond on 6th fairway d. construct a shelter building List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Letter to Linblad (Ground's Swerintendent) 5/17/85 Exhibit E - Staff Memo 7/12/85 Exhibit F - Planning Commission Minutes of 7/1.5/85 Exhibit G - 7/19/85 Notice to Linblad Exhibit H - Jverall Landscape Plan Exhibit. I - List of Projects Exhibit. J - Sketch of 8th and 17th Hole Proposals Exhibit K - 1981 Conditional Use Permit Approval Documentation Exhibit I. - 1967 Original Conditional Use Permit. The Wayzata Country Club operates a golf criurse and private club under a conditional use permit issued Septembe. 13, 1968, pursuant to the 1967 rezoning of the City. Since that date, the Wayzata Country Club has applied for and been granted many permits and conditional use permits for structural additions to the property. No conditional. use permits or is for grading/excavating work are known to have been issued anti i 1981. At that time Wayzata Country C1uL was admonished by City staff to apply for an after -the -fact conditional use permit for grading work in a pond near. OId Long Lake Road. That conditional use permit was g,.anted to Wayzata Country Club after a Public Hearing at the Planning Commission meeting of 2/2/81, in which the Planning Commission gave the Wayzata Country Club representative present the impression that this matter could best. be handled by staff and should not need Council review. Pursuant to the. Planning Commission recommendation fer approval of a conditional use permit., the former City Administrator took a telephone poll of the Council and the item appeared on the consent agend,-i , *.he ncxt Council meet-' nR. Zoning File #935 January 24, 1986 Page 2 This series of events led the Wayzata Country Club's Grounds Superintendent, Jim Linblad, to believe that projects of this nature did not require City approval, and in fact from tnc.t time until 1985, a number of excavations and earth -moving projects occurred on the golf course without City knowledge or approval, and without grading permits. These recent projects were part of an overall upgrade and relandscaping plan that the Wayzata Country Club has been pursuing for a number of years. In May 1985, staff received a phone call from a concerned citizen regarding a newly excavated pond on fairwa- #5. Staff investigated and found a 25'x100'x4' deep pond, and a lain went through the process of telling Linblad that a conditional use permit was required, etc. etc. The application was filed and the entire landscape plan sub- mitted for review, at staff's request. The Planning Commission recom- mended approval of the 5th fairway pond, and recommended that the Wayzata Country Club apply for permits on a yearly basis for each years projects. The intent was that any major projects which would normally require a conditional use permit review be brought back to Planning Commission and Council at that time. Staff then discussed with Linblad that certain projeL . b )bably would need a more detailed review, and we should discuss them wi... the City Engineer prior to taking this to Council for final approval on a one-time basis, requiring only future dealings w'Lh staff orri those projects. On 9/27/85, after a discussion with Li.,,,ad, staff agreed to hold off the application until the 1986 projects were approved by the Wayzata Country Club board of directors. The 1986 projects were Just recently approved, and on 1/23/86, Linblad called to obtain permits for contractors to start work on hole #8 on 1/27/86 (while the ground is still frozen). Because this exceeds 100 cubic --ds of fill, I noted that a more in-depth review is required, and the timing of his request leaves little time for review. Nev, theless, City Engineer Glenn Cook and I met with Linblad on 1/23/86 to review the proposed project on #8 and also the extension of #17 tee. Both these projects were found to be in excess of 100 cubic yards of fill but relatively minor in nature (reviewed below). Linblad also noted the immediate plans to dredge the existing pond on #6 fairway - not in- cluded on landscape plan and staff later found that thia is a de- signated wet land; although it may have been dugout from a low area in the 19501s, it is cons.iOered a designated wetland on City maps. Please review the projects on #8 and #17 (Exhibit J). Per the City Engineer's review of the site, these projects are recommended for approval based on the information in hand. The proposal to dredge the desiqnated wetland certainly is a more environmentally sensitive project in scope, and needs a more detailed review then can be done with the information submitted to date. Zoning File #935 January 24, 1986 Page 3 Staff Recommendation: 1. Staff would recommend approval of the project to add +/- 1000 cubic yards of fill to rebuild the bunkers on hole #8; and would recommend approval of the project to extend tee #17 b1 adding +/- 370 cubic yards of fill. 2. Staff would recommend that the proposal to dredge a designated wetland be referred to Planning Commission and be the subject of a separate conditional use permit application. 3. Staff would recommend that Wayzata Country Club be reminded of the need for a conditional use permit for the proposed shelter building. 4. Staff would recommend that a thorough review of all remaining projects in the landscape plan be completed as soon as possible, and that Council adopt a formal policy on future grading projects by Wayzata Country Club and other clubs in the City where earth -moving is a regular occurrance. 5. City Engineer to review the pond on A5 fairway which was excavated in 1985. To: Orono Council Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant ng Administrator Date: January 27, 1986 Subject: #935 Wayzata Cou :ry Club, Conditional Use Permit Proposed Motion: To grant conceptual approval to Wayzata Country Club for various Bart:: -moving projects per the following conditions and direction to staff: 1. Approval of the immediately pending reconstruction of the bunkers on hole #8 by adding approximately 1000 cubic yards of fill. 2. Approval of the extention of tee #17 by adding appr-vi- mately 370 cubic yards of frill, such project expecteu to commence in the fall of 1986. 3. The two projects proposed in items 1 and 2 above may commence immediately but not until the applicant has ob- tained a grading, excavation, and filling permit per the current fee schedule for calendar year 1986. 4. The proposed dredgin7 of the pond on hole #6 is specifi- cally not approved and shall be subject to a separate conditional use permit application and review by the City Engineer, staff, Planning Commission and Council. 5. City staff is directed to review with the applicant and the City Engineer all proposed and completed projects as shown on the submitted landscaping and improvement plan, and shall present Council with recommendations for the disposition of each project and shall draft a conditional use permit incorporating such recommendations and findings as may be appropriate for review by Council at the regular Council meeting of February 24, 1986. vV a (City Of ()RONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 3 (C) i SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 - FILE #935 WHEREAS, Wayzata Country Club (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 200 West Wayzata Boulevard located within the City of. Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: The southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 36, Township 11.8 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, excluding roads; Also known as P.I.D. #36-11.8-23-43-0001 (here- inafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a Conditional Use Permit to permit certain grading projects regulated under Zoning Code Section 1.0.03 Subdivision 19 and to permit construction of a shelter building per Section 10.20 Subdivision 3. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FIr.:. 7 NGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #935. 2. The property is located in the RR-lB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. 3. On July 15, 1985, the Or•r,no Planning Commission reviewed the application as proposed anc, recommended approval of the various projects which were deemed ,•-y City staff to be of a minor nature not requiring detailed review. 4. The City Council reviewed this application on January 27, 1986 and grant-] conceptual approval for two projects proposed to be immediately commenced in Spring 1986, and directed staff to review the various projects anticipated to be commenced later in 1986 and in future years. 5. The following projects were recommended by staff for approval on April 14, 1986: a) Extension of tee 04, filling of approximately 30 cubic yards to be spread 6" deep on high ground. Page 1 of 4 .s1..t 4• :�5 - b) c) d) e) f) City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Construction of low mounds on left side of fairway ill, averaging 3-5' in height, filling of approximately 75 cubic yards• Fill in the existing bunker on hole #13, approximately 20 cubic yards of fill. Pond on fairway 45, 25'x75'x5' deep, 350 cubic yards excavation. Rebuild bunkers at rear of hole t8, approximately 1000 cubic yards of fill, all on high ground. Extension of the tee 117, filling of approximately 370 cubic yards, all on high ground. g) Construction of a shelter building, 1217"x15", one story in height, located southeast of tee #12, located; approximately 90' from the nearest property line, and requiring no variances to the zoning code. 6. The proposed projects are located in the upper reaches of the watershed; runoff from this area travels though a series i of swales, ditches, and wetlands before reaching Lake Minnetonka an approximate distance of 1 mile away; the proposed projects are insignificant within the overall watershed and will have no significant effect on the quality or quantity cf runoff water entering Lake Minnetonka. 7. The City Council has considered the application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 8. The City Council finds that granting a Conditional Use Permit to allow the proposed excavation and construction projects will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, iould not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger �o neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed , level of use of the property will be in keeping with the in+,ent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Con,prehen.sive Flnn -;f the city, CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a Conditional use Permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.2U, Page 2 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Subdivision 3 (C) to permit the constiuction of a shelter building and per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to permit certain excavation, fill and grading projects, subject to the following condi,:ioris: 1. The following excavation, grading, sni filling projects are hereby approved subject to the applicant ob_airir.g a grading permit once each year for projects to be completed in that year: a) Extension of tee A4, approximately 30 cubic yards of fill. b) Construction of low mounds on left side of fairway #11, filling of approximately 75 cubic yards. c) Fill in the existing bu.:' r on hole 113, approximately 20 cubic yards of fill. d) Pond on fairway #5, 350 cubic yards excavation. e) Rebuild bunkers at rear of hole #E, approximately 1000 cubic yards of fill. f) Extension of the tee #17, filling of. approximately 370 cubic yards. 2. Proper plans must be bubmitted to the building 1epartment for review and a building permit for the shelter building must be obtained prior to commencement of construction. 3. All filled, graded or excavated areas shall be protected from causing sediment erosion into adjacent waterways by methoas deemed appropriate by the City Inspector until such time that the areas in question are revegetated. 4. The applicant shall notify the City 24 hocrs in advance of commencement of any of the projects so that -he City Inspector can be present. on the site as neceessary. 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and condit:ioi,s of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate an!, aut iority granted herein, and shall lie punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned owner has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms o: this resolution and on behalf of himse If, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Ck7 y of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 14th day of April, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor (1) Property Owner Page 4 of 4 TO: Mayor Butler and Council ers FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE: April 8, , SUBJ: #967-968 Ju.,n B.A. Idstrom II - 2580 Fox Street Preliminary Subdivision Approval of Resolution Attached is a Resolution of Preliminary Subdivision approval per your conceptual approval of 3/10/86. (Minutes attached) MINUTE:; OF THE: REGULAR ORONU COUNCI L MEETING HNLI1 MARCIf 10, 14I3b PUBLIC COMMENTS continued Counci l.momlwi Adams stated that was not. the tut a 1 of the reasons and stated he did not w'-h to debate this further in this forum. Mr. Wheeler askeJ the Council ii they intend to honor this request to reappoint Bill Sime and/or expand the Planni.ig Commission to include him. he stated that if the Cc.unci 1 memberF- do not honor the citizens desi ces, they will have so. difficulty with re-election this fall. Bill Anlerson, 2760 Shadywood Rd., notea tndC. i1C would like to get a copy of the minutes regarding this subject. Duane Hall, 1860 Shadywood Rd., asked Mayor Butler if she planned to share her views regarding the charges made by Mr. Sime its his letter to the Council. Mayor Butler stated that she would not make any comment regarding Mr. Sime's letter. C-uncilmember. Frahm stated that Mr. Sime was asked to at.pear before the Council. to discuss reappointment, but he chose not to and rather wrote a letter regarding his feelings. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: #967 AN v #966 HN B. IDSTROM 2580 PDX PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION/ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Pr -Gen' for this matter were the applicant's, John B.A. im II and David M. Ostreim, and their surveyor, -onberg. CAL ristrator Bernhardson explained the request for a s ision with variance for driveway to cross wecl, and a variance for frontage on a public street togetl,jr with a request for a conditional use permit to fill on wetlands. Assista Zoning Administrator Gaffron refs -ed to his memo on lot frontage requirement., regarding public: street versus non-public street. He noted that the subdivsion essentially meets the criteria save the technicality of the frontage requirements. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD MARCII 10, 1986 '4967 i #968 IDSTROM continued Assistant Zoning Administrator noted that the driveway has been reviewed by staff and f inds no problem with the access location. He also noted :.he potential of a future third lot which would create problems for the applicant. Mayor Butler stated that the resolution should note the potential problems regarding future re -subdivision wl-ich would require the relocation of the access to propert s off the private street. Mr. Idstrom stated he was not concerned with a third lot at this time and would deal with that problem in the future if it aro. . Councilmember Adams stated he found nj problem with the proposed subdivision of two lots only but would if there were three. It was moved by Councilmember Ada -is, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, directin staff to drift a resolution with the apprcpriate variance relating , the frontage and specifying that this is approval of two lots not i.ng the " ture problems of - third lot, to by presented be -tore t ina l approval at the March 24, 1986 Counc.i i mec-t.ing. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. 0990 WARD RERRELL 3405, 3411, 3415 WATERTOWN ROAD VARIANCE Ward Ferrell was present for this matter along with his attorney, Leroy Haglund, City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a variances on two existing lots, which are in the 2 acre zone and arc substandard under the current code. He stated chat this waF pr}tented last May as a zoning appeal. He noted that applicant has had septic site testing none and has proposed ac•eptable primal and alternate sites. Mr. Haglund stated that applicant's dream was to build a hourst- on one of these Iota and was platted as suc:-, many years ago. He submitted a petition signed by the neighbors st::;inq the} have no objections to this proposal. He also submitted aerial phc'-os to show that. the applicant's proposal would not be 1.nt7c--s:atant with the area. A RRSOLTJTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR A PLAT AT 2580 FOX STREPT APPLICATION NO,967 WHEREAS, John B. A. Idstrom II, on August 23, 1985, filed a formal subdivision application wi*ti the City for a:)proval of a two-1-M residential plat of property legs l l •, de ;k- , bed as: .Lots 13 and 14, Audit :'s Subdivision Number 229, Hennepin County, 'innesota (hereasttr "property"); and WHERRAS, after due published and mailed n•.,tice in accordance r ith Minnesota Statues 462.358 et. F g. and the City of Orono Zoning and Platting Codes, the Orono Fla: i Commission held a public hearing on September 16, 1985, at which t me a1_ persons :Jer ng to be heard concerning this application were given the c►portur.' speak. thereon; and WHEREAS, the "lanning Commission further reviewed this application concurrently . '_h 1�ppl.. jtion No.9(8, requesting variances and a conditional Use Permit ; excavation in wetlands, on February 18, 1986; and WHEREAS, at t.h._ gu - r meeting held on March 10, 1.986, the i.;tc no City Counr:il consideieu t -,divisior. app tion cf John B. A. Idstro,-+ [1 noting the following f ;)rjs of fact: 1. The properf is 1 -)cated t , hin ..he RR-.l B Single Fami 1 , Rural Residential zc- vi requiring a-ninimum of 2 acres of %..-=tiguous dry jithin each new":y created lot. 2. The pry.. tal cf 1'.5 ar:es of land, 3., acres which is cor- 1. 4. Both Lots , ant 2 meet the minimum width requirt•ments of 2nO fe c; however, the proposed 1 Dt configuration requi : es a street Page 1 of 4 frontage variance for Lot 2, wh4^.h oues not abut or front on a public street. 5. Lets 1 and 2 will share a single driveway access onto Fox Street rather than accessing from the existing private road immediately west of the property, and this will require that appropriate access easements of 20' width be granted from each new lot to the other. 6. The City wi l l requ? re a Conservation and Flowage Easement over t;te designated wetlands on Lota 1 and 2. 7. The City will require that 18.7 feet of additional right-of-way for Fox Street be dedicated on the Plat. 8. Both Lots ) an. i '-lave been demonstrat i to have suitable sites foi r mary and alter. re dr.ainfields to serve the proposed houses. 9. .+lthough Lot '. contains enough dry bu Ah' tid to meet the area standard for an additional future to r treet, .uch a subdivision creating a 3rd lot on this props....-. propert, would require a replat of Lot 1 and would require --)nstruction of a road to Residential Private Road Standards to wive all 3 Lots and the City would at that time require that all 3 .Lots gain access from Much road or would need to access onto Fox Run, and variances to the frontage requirer nts w 1ld be needed for the rear Lot. 10. The access to the proposed building site on Lot 1 requires a variance and Conditional Use Permit in order to construct a driveway across they designat -d wetland, which variances and Conditional Use Permit we.i.r concept ally approved by the ^ity Council on March 10, 1986. 11. Single family res.,,lences can be constructed on ly ' h Lots 1 and 2 without the need for fur, -her variances.; and M®IRR16w the City will grant th- variances and Conditional Use Permit for a 32 rridor for crossing of t.,r_ wetlands as ;),Art of the Final Subdivision Rea. (:ion. NOW TRE DE IT RESOLVED, that based up . :.ner oi.e or more of the findings noted above, the City Counci) of t1h � of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat for John A.A. Idstr -I at 2580 Fox Street Parr 2 of 4 per survey dated 4-2-P4/8-2'-85/ revised 11-27-85 by Coffin an6 Gronberg, Inc. sub ect to the following conditions: 1.. Lots 1 =.nr 1 shall share a single driveway access located as shown on the pre_iminary plat drawing. 2. A Conservation and Flowage easement shall be granted over the designated wetlands on the property. The following list of final submittals mist be submitted to the Zoning Admin,i.st-rator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meet:.ing on the second and four"i Mondays of the month: 1. Recor. PI-t dr,:wings in the form of two mylar copies and ona copy reduced to 1" - ")'. Drawing to include: a. lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Coffir; and Gronberg, Inc. dated 4-2-84/8-23-85 revised b. dedication of 18.7 feet of right-of-way for Fox Street C. dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' w4.de along all perimeter property lines and i' each side of internal property lines d. designation and dedicationi of the wetlandf drainage easements on the plat _- 2. Legal Documents required: a. Title r',pin.ion addressed to the City. All. owners, me-tgage holders or -hers with property interest indicated therein shall sign the p1a,� and all other documents affected by such ia.terr�st b. the a►iplicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property C. signed and executed Flowage and Conservation F'asements; blank area requiring desc-4-tion may be filled out as follows "over the drainage - aserr s as shown on the plat of (,-,lat name)'. of 4 r 3. Fees to be paid. Total due: $450.00 a. Park Dedication Fees per current schedule: Lot 1, 10.1 acres - $100.00, Lot 2 at 3.4 acres - $200.00 - Total is $300.00 b. lega? review and filing fee of 0.,0.00 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held April 14, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, C ty C erk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Page 4 of 4 jJ To: Council Members COUNCIL MWING From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assitant Zoning Administrator APR 111986 Date: March 14, 1986 CITY OF ORON Subject: 1990 Ward Ferrell - 3405 Watertown - Variance - Additional Information Note: Please refer to your memo from the March 10 meeting. List of Exhibits A - 1974 Public Hearing Minutes - Rezoning B - Similarly situated properties - A-M (map) C - Sketches T. Re: Ferrell comment that at time of rezoning, City stated that existing Tots' would still be buildable. The atta:;hed copy of the 1974 rezoning public hearing minutes contains the only reference I could find regarding the stat s of existing lots (p.2.). II. Documentatio^ of Fimilar Cases in the Rural Zone. I have again reviewed the "2S similar cases" referred to in the previous memo, in which substandard lots of record are commonly owned but separate for tax purposes. Actually, this second review uncovered a total of at least 30 such situations, of which I will document here the dozen or so which have a high potential for a future variance request: A) 320 Woodhill Road - 2 parcels: w/house-•3.5 acre; vacant-1-1 acre; vacant lot fronts on Edgewood Hills Road. B) 105 Cygnet Place - 2 parcels: w/house-1.0 acre; vacant-1.0 acre. C) 3865 Bayside Road - 2 parcels: w/house-0.7 acre; vacant-1-2 acre. D) 341 West Lake Street - 3 parcels: w/house-0.5 acre: vacant- 0.5 acre; vacant-0.5 acre. E) Lakeview Golf Course - 4 parcels: Golf Course-125 acres; vacant-1.98 acres; vacant-1.98 acres; vacant-0.75 acres(only parcel with road frontage). F) 1080/1090 Heritage Lane - 3-plus parcels: w/house-7.0 acres(estate); vacant-1.0 acres; vacant-1.0 acres. r) 1425 Bayridge Road - 2 parcels: w/house-1.0 acre; vacant acre. H) 1900 Shoreline Drive - 2 parcels: w/house-1.4 acre; vacant- 1.7 acre. File #990 Page 2 of 2 I) 300 Sixth Ave. N.- 2-plus parcels: w/house-100 ac.+; vacant- 3.5 acre. J) 879 North Brown Road - 2 parcels: w/house-1.0 acre; vacant- 2.6 acres. K ) 960 N. Willow Drive - 2 parcels: w/house-1.0 acre; vacant- 1.0 acre. L) 320 Turnham Read - 2 parcels: w/house-1.7 acres; vacant-1.1 acres. M) 200 Bederwood Road - 4 parcels: w/house-0.9 acre; vacant - 0.6 acre; vacant - 1.1 acre; vacant - 1.0 acre. These 13 cases can be broken down into a number of categories: 1. Tota. acreage of commonly -owned parcels is great. enough to yie13 conforming lots if lot lines are re -arranged: A,E,F,I. 2. Total acreage of commonly -owned parcels yields only enough area for a single substandard lot with existing house: C,D,L. 3. Total acreage of commonly -owned parcels yields enough area for a single conforming lot with house, but not enough additional area for a second conforming lot: B,G,H,J,K,M (these are very similar to Ferrell situation). III. To help Council assess the impact of granting or denying the Ferrell variances, consider the following figures: - Number of existing developed lots in the unsewered residential zones: 1,050 approximately - Numbei of undeveloped, substandard sized lots, in single separate ownership in unsewered zones: 15 identified - Number of unsewered common ownership sii.uationa with a realistic potential for requestinq variances to lot area in order to gain an additional building site: 22 identified (13 of these shown as A-M attacted) - Within a 1/2 mile radius of the Ferrell properties (excluding the 3 Stubbs Bay Study Area streets Tonka Avenue, Crestview Avenue, Eastlake Street where SeWe.- '.s contemplated) the existing developed lot sizes are: 2.0 acre or larger - 39 1.25 acre to 1.99 acre - 13 .75 acre to 1.24 acre - 23 i,ess than .7j- acre - 11 r -* CITY OF Or?O; IO C+7 Special Meeting of the Planning Cc�missicn, March 13, 1974. 7:45 P.A. Members present: Chairman Brad VanNest, Fred Curtis, Charles Kallestad, Val EIIio*t, John Guthrie, Ronald Kullberg, Paul Pesek. members absent: ;•largo Gasch. Chairman VanNest opened the Public Hearing at 7:45 P.H. For consideration of zoning amendments involvinq changes in dis- trict boundaries and district classifications within the City. The Zoning AdminlstrL�tor presented the Notice of Public gear- ing, the Affidavit of Publication, and the Certificate of Mailing to affected property owners. Chairman VanNest Introduced Mayor Robert Searles. (4ayor Searles wiicomed the people r esent and explained what would be taking place at the meeting and thanked the c:itiens for their participation and Input in the rezoning. Ch3lrman VanNest explained the maps; the zoning district;,; the permitted, conditional, and accessory uses, and other (_ requirements In the various zoning districts. The following persons appea,cd and were given an opportunity to be heard: COr•'I' 1ENT : 4mr_ : Regarding the 5-acre zone: Arq_� there prohibitions ageinst Bill McKnight feeder lot? We should cons I de- taking thorr out of our : odes. Cf►a i raven Von'lmt The Watershed Dls-. ict d P.C.A ha,,e made many studies on Mayor Searles his matter. Environmental pollution doe3 cane from :Mock terms, Vie Must have locreasing control In the future. There are spacIfir. requirements in the code r1oltt now for Chairmen VanNest livestock forms, A person rust have 10 acres or more and re- celve a ConditIona: use permit t-om the City. Do you have restrictic;i, of the numher of animals, etc.7 BIII McKnight Wotody can take an existin;I stock farm and increase the stock "ayor Searles or expand the operatior;. There are limitations on pasturing and ! ) I ng of hot ses . V;'e felt It necessary to provide for hrb"y farms. it is d tag- Chairman Vnnt4e!;t Ifirtate use of the Isnd. The area designated on raps as 5 acres Is princlpaily being used as t!obby firms today. Peop!e should be able to buy 2 acres without sower for the Hill '!r_Knight same money they would spend on one acre with sewer. What about peoplo in the 5 acre zone that have lots with less than 5 acres? The code provides for non-conform;ng use. If the property Chairman VanNest was platted prior to code, the 31ty will co,itlnue to allow the sites for building lots. I have 20 acres, 70 acres, 10 acres, 3 acres, 5 acres, and 1_,)ren Butterfield two residents on 15 acres. The new zoning fits the area+ nicely. A number of other residents to the West are on larger tracts. We are in favor of the 5 9cre zone. Why are you showing Highwiv 12 where you are? Mary Carol The Planning Commission was trying to avoid dividing the City Chairmen Va~ by a freeway. A study map from the Highway Department wk,s shown indlcatir,g Mayor Searl&s 4 alternati�,es that they have considered in the past. Why have you shown 2 acre lots on land close to the industrial Mylow Schnit area? Why Is it not used for more denies development? ®The Planning Commission was not able to iron out and nail CheIrMom Ven;iNt down all the problems. The map shows a plan study area around t' industrial areas. Plans for Highway i2 are 2.) to 25 years away and is beyond Mayor Searles our control. This Is a prerequisite for deter,;;; oroi. land uses. We also cannot have mcre dense lend u (e51- the property is sewered. We can't avoid fact, like pile and road capacity before making a decision regarding the ^ompre- hensive plan. In 1975, the Metro interceptor should be con- necteC. it will pick up Long Lake and Orono Extended sewer I;r,l,s will allow a more dense land use. I have 20 acrez that connects to old Crystal Day Road. Why '•1ar/ Caro; are you making it a 5 acre zore when It coulo be put Into I acre lots now? Why are you talking about 5 acre zoning with Highway r2 coming through? Highway 12 Is at least 20 years away. If we l eavo 1 ar.re Zrji_ .hem i r-o r, . ,,hest Ing and development takes place, the dens,+y wi11 fi>rro sewe, and nn nd;es!� chain of urban related exp• se-_ 11e have the best drainarie In the rea. Mary Carol there. 15 no sewer avail, there. Chairman Varaliest Sewer will be avallatie to connect to some day. Nary Carol his Is a decision we'll have to Make. It would cost 5 112 Chairman Vantlest to 6 MIIIiGr! dollars for •-unk line to service that area. The pubi lc hearings Infj,r_ttA(t alnw,)st unan;raclus disapproval of the sewer project. I,hy is rm; property zoned for 5 acre lots while 2 acre r:,ning Is considered across the street? Do you want it brought back to 2 acres? A Public Hearing is not to present concrete facts and decis- ions. What you do and say has an infruence on what happens. �,Iould you suggest the ertire piece be zoned for 2 acres? To Stubbs E3ay Road. Oir' iou use the Soil Conservation Service information to de- te—A ne what soils would support on -site systems? Intentions are: Alot of areas in Orono cannot have the sewer system. Everyone is telling us the same thing. Homes on 112 acre lots are too small for septic syrrems and pr'vate wells. le should draft a stiff ordinance to specify what type of Septic system should be constructed, end make the party show two sites for the septet system. We want to fund the Staff f,.) Insroct annually the septic systems, and if It Is not workinj properly, make them fix it, or we'll fix it and nssoss them. Oe must know that septic system won't work before we :pond r.x,ney to PU�sewer i n . —� ©5--acre zoning seems restrictive )-,d a neans for K8©n i n7 most peopro ou+ of Orono. Mary Carol Chairman VanNest 'layor Searles Chairman VanNest Mary Carol Evert Ties Chairman '/anNest Evert Tle�-. It is. not our intention at all to keep peopl out of Orono. ;43 y-r Searles Orono is a good sized area. It's a "cookie -cutter" area. We think diversity noc Is good. Orono is big enough to acconate all types. Other bodies such as the 'Ietro Council are con- cerned alsc. It appoars looking at the map that 60% of land is 2 or 5 acres. Fred Polsson A th I acre development, 13 of the !and is hardcovered, that should not create a storm water problem. What sort of economic iiipact will this plan have on the community? 5-acre coning was not designed to aleviate the septic problol, Ch:jl�,an VanNest but rather to allow a particular type of land use. It seemed lecls,-)ry to have 2 acres. 'o -ant to protect Lake '1 i nnetonka . llhy aren't we going to ;vve r i t'r ', Ihy are you allowing development at all If there Is not su►ier available? 1;,u know Tonkawa 'toad, Nor+h Arm, florth Shore Drive, and lic,ct - bor, y ari- urea, -That pry, currontly being considered for sower. Ohe stream enter i ng Stubbs Flay ha-, to be po I I ut i ncl take ' 1 f nn- aronk3. How are we going to ha.„1Io it? , lo, ,ve dc:n't know flat. ile are hay I nn It checked out. We „a.,t tolZc►@ If it is fotr,iblo 'c; snWAr this aroa, ;end If so, ;i i l d,-, It. r red Polssnn Mayor Searles Fred Po I sson +oyor Nearlas The problem is pockets of devolopment. ;ie have got to fln,; Chairman VanWest alternate ways of solvinn the problem rathe" than expand sew- ers. What sort of economic Innnc+ will the rezoning have on the Fred Polsson horeowner? it Is speculative to predict suture land values. In some Mayor Searles situations, the -value could incioase, but in most cases, it would undoubted;; Ilminish. in reading Via letter sent out, I was under the impression Dick Putnam that a Compo-ahensive Plan of Orono would be d'scussed. Ap- parently, this meeting is to discuss a modiflcation of the Toning ordinance without a Comprehensive Plan. Why are you coming In with zoning ordinances wt;en you don't have the Comprehensiva Sian? You are putting the cart before the horse. It is ogod to be using the Metropolitan Council as a nu i de, b,it you haven't considered such things as housing. Low or moderate housing Pas not been considered and many may find themselves not being able to afford to live here. Omno is a leader In fighting to keep Lake Minnetonka clean, bnd yet we see that I acre lots with sewer on the lake does not nc::essarlly arrest the pollution pr-blem. Funding annual Inspectors for septic systems seems t ue a poor use of dol- lars that could be put +o use elsewher3. Too many issues haven't been sc:ved. S_4;_- of the de�_islors Chairman VanNost are in the planning study areas. We realizo nary decisions have to be made. Orono I.n't irgnoring housing policies. We have approached Aayor Searles the 'letropolitan Council on how a housing policy can be ap- plied to Orono. John Gu.:irla is putting full effort into studyln2 how policies would apply to Oror.o. The City has discussed tax credit for refurbishing oldor structures. We will have a workable plan on.housing policies. '.,.here is the Consultant's report? Do they concur with the Comprehensive Plan? Rratrjrlb nian has been Incorporated Into the Plannlnn Commis- i or. ; rt c r.r r nndat l on . I j�(ror; t'iat wo Are puttlnq the cart before the horse. We are exploring sewer proposals before we complete the Compre- henslve Plan. There has b".n a rush • sonts and we cannot continuo when eli:... s of the Comproh re ;'Ian are undecided. I was worried about the Comprahereslve: rlan so I wont to the Metropolitan Council and saw the poo;lle who would review the Plan. l asked If we should hold this Public Hc+arind and would they advino us to handle it es the I'lanninrg Com., Ission raw tit. Todd F-ue.- na 1 rr-on Van -Jest Mayor 4Pxirles 1 looked at a Comprehensive Plan as being a glossy r,_)verod book. Chairman VanNest Ua!mq practical, it is on book that's novur finished; a nevur- onding prcro!.s; Implumontnticn of rh.,ui'Pub,_,, otc. . J , You are upgrading some land and downgrslding oth,&rs. how can ,you 'iwm-zone? I question you right! We have taken to overall viow of the entire City and did this as pai + 3f an overall p I an What you are talking o bout Is taking use away from the land, We are not doing it capriciously or arbitrarily. This mould to Illegal. tie aro keeping the public issue In m;nd. As legel Counsel for 'Ar. Neslund. ;hayenne Land Company, I would I 1 ke to s !bm i t my i to the 2 acre zoning the property lnvc;ved I• lit ition and will submit -ur grounds for objection If Ia+tor. Why are you going P!I a way to the tractcs will the sewor on North Willow Drive? Eiornord Kl ugman „hairman VanNest 'Aayor -ear i es Walter Crass Don 14 i dd I est St.wer 1s being designed as a trunk i!ne to handle that area. Chairman Vanilest It 's designed In a ment with Long Lake. Are you intores- tc in having the i,c ona around Hackberry zoned differently? I am on County Road 6. I am uneasy about having the size of Hilda Hollander tKo lots raised. They are also being revalued now. The prof,srty tripled in valuo last yaar. How definite are the regulations? Will xt: ta ?aying for trunk line? With this zoning, the cost of property In prone will he prohibitive. Oft Q. There; Is no chanza proposed for your area. Leaving It toned Chairman 4anhlest the currenT Y—RreS is what's proposed. The reason for 2 acres and S acres Is to prevent the need to assess 'he trunk to he landowners. We are alev ating the need for people to * their property to pay off a sewer assessment. a the Isck of a Cceprehensivo i­tr. is bad. i l *tartin wauid ilk* to stress that the !(w. proheniive Plan wiiI to amen VanNest completed. Property on 51 adjacent to Maxwell °ley; Ttw property is being Larry Fork (P-,dnpc4 to 112 acre residential. havw owned *his property for 22 yearr i,, 1966, Orono attaarated a slmiiar rezoning as Is being propas sd now. ' went to cm-t . The batt i e ail ex- pense were groat. The court c,,id the C,ty action ras arblt�- rary, and It was zoned back to what It is. Orc„ n will be tek- on to court again f:ar arbitrary action --a the duc,slon of tha court would ba the some. Thera IS an excess i vo amount of LA-k if) the 4axwe ! I aroa . Tho Cra I rrvin vnnflest LWO has don► resoarch In -the area ar.d sratistics .,ave ht+er camp la(' StatlstICS h,v® proven the Maxwell %v ; c ono n, tha wore: bays for I)oa+ 4f'.7rago, lit lino with overel i phi i- i- tphy for protecting le-w M,nnotc-nke, 1 do not #eel we are bei, QcerR-;r t c I u:ri or arb' trery by atti%�_ k i nl ttq ,)rob i rms ias we are. I hope � u Are sincere. You nave cut dcr.4.s from SOC' to 2W'. Larry . k It 1, all taken tLn to ",ovtr Ict Itw .rse ut tl%% Ink*. Wr'y should II -no marine be ponali?+d? Ay was the stno marins singled I began work on inis proposed zoning before I ever know Chairman VanNoSt about the 066 •ioant. I want It on record that pur,tiativr les will be sought Larry Hork against each member of the Planning -ro ission and Council and anyone else involved in formulating the ;,ew zor'n,7 J- Inance. People of R-2 area have a letter of he City. It :,tan StrrsIoy Is si—ed by all the Oeople In the or ested money In it for one purpose: Because It is .. ;!,.n ComnercIa i . i paid a considerable amount of money f.^i property. Ur-lgr the pressnt proposed zoning, you w:i' allow only 4 unita " be jilt on the property. Throe to four per acre. A total of 6 fry the to*al piece. Chairmen V, test I couldn't build and soil residential units L,Tting next to Stan Straley two marinas. Property here w!ll lay and deteriorate to nothing. Whcre did you get the information on Maxwell Ba,? Fr ",e LMCD, s •',•tanti,,+ surveys from Hennepin Cd1111140r,/ talker; with Hen^opin ne 'Counts and they+ said M_ +el i Bay Is Stan Stral:,y oOf thr-o least used bays on tll4i :_$kA. This Is an srffort to got at,., from romnorcIaI zoning OV dovIous means. Your arguR+cnts are heing shot full of holes. I will }fir to the lull exto, 1 am spoak 7 for the Lake Minnetonka Improvement Association. age ,;,,hnyon i or,, in sur-port of the total zoning chbn_+o proposal. The gr„up supports the zoning proposal and opposes no restaur- ant on Maxwell Bay. Casco r'olnt - As a mother and a res .cn+, I Ic, d e{ .e property involved, i weul9 not =onsidc living the ,nd It should remain commercial. this arse IL not a nico neighborhood, an'_ is too late for this " of proposal. The trafflC on the Bay Is high, Tf+e ^Iann+ng Corrsniss., proposal Is yroet. You arq nrit j I v.l ng thQ p r(,b I era ', y rezon i+ it to ro s i den t i a l hecauwo ti.e Mibr - tur w i i r st i I i ex I St. I s i t p(.>!, s l b f e to a l! ow a restaurant and riot rezonc the le,4? The fear is that the "+tar inog w:' - oxpnnd into the --.a tr t Is c�rosuwy OtLupiod by the horny;;, Mrs. Charles Davis Don S+otf6r Nir,rmar Renner Dick Karl ad Vant.esy i f . he p roperf y i s rotr)r,gd, tn, va I uc w I I{ + 3s !han 1 original Cost to Mr. Straley. If we wol 1 1; ,r ;ratweit against thu cost to Mr. Stral,Y c ints-®.,t v, i t s©ur+= t ►err r 3 pan i ng i ; no+ Ju%titlod. tx► pr()I,c)r f v a lcm i Nave► , e -+�, , ,., , •-C.r, { d-►nt' if i Drool:-' errty. ii• l !ftn rblort •`) r Thl., used to be the access `o Jackson Corners. Since it no Chairman Vanrlest longer sorves this function, and there Is an excossive amount of corv%rcial property in Navarre area, it w.ss decided that �J this property should be rezoned to a residential land use. If our property was rezoned, it would result In a loss of approximately 60% to 70% of the land value. W3 ;:ould con- struct twelve 112 acre lots; 6 of which would be along thg railroad tracks. The B4 zone on the south side of Co. Rd. IS should extend all the way to Carman Avenue. Will the property ecst of the school complex be part of the study area? Also, the property along Hirghway 12 should be mapped as a sewered area. Although +hls is not Indicator! on the map, this will be a study or Will the Council compensate those whose land will be back - zoned? Tonka Corporation Ed Laymen Eli I I Gonyea Chairman VanNest ;Zry Nelson Will the taxe3 change since some property Is no longer in a Mr. F,hurst comnerclel zone? Also, I would like to question the need for all the property that is sr,_o zoned for off;ce space. It also seems unfair that all people should have to adhere to the 751 setback requirement from the lake. B-4 (Office district) is a common land use. We have deter•- Chairman VanNest [nod that the present commercial land In Navarre was exces- sive, and, therefore, a B-4 classification is not unreason- able. Also, variances will be granted to the 75r lakeshore setback requirement. 1 would like to go on rocord as being 'n favor _�f the proposed John Erdehi zoning change for the +heator property in Navarre. The Navarre Community and C 'ce Association did support the Cliff 8jork contention that therm was e)._:.,sive cormrercial property In the Navarre area. The report, however, contondod that land should be reclassiflod tots land use of equal economic value. Have we Investigatod the possibility of bringing In more Indus- David Bye trial uses? Fiore industry wrsuld increase the tax base. The Planning Commission rb s considered Including more Indust- Chairff'ort VnnNbst trial property in the Comprehonsivo Plan. Expansion of indus- try to the west, however, eight not be compatible with the school to the north. 40 nood more industry in Orono because Indust-y provides jobs. Mr. WIN ito OIndustry brings In morn people w!v) nood more schools, reeds, UiII W KnIght and parks. 14any people are going eisowh•±re to work when they ctuld bo Tanko Corporation �iroridad with empIoyslrtn+ r fight horn in thri community. 6L -4 MDENCE 14 LAKE loop- J 4—; 4� N gg��; Y, OLUM *OOBEAC a Aftw LM-E PI PCTOWA PAR woe Room RL AU A04 & tP. fL AM) o LLAY JK k �X/f1GIT Srr��oNs q-yv,,. Nil 4 ENCE AUX L NG LAKE pip 40 NMVRWNONEE N A'A OVOHEAC WWGJ LA" 14 Pff1W A Z-16 is 1 /* —. Voo" 411(0 A. 4.1, t A 1 Lai 32_0 WoobkILL o2c044"�- I .i I i' /O S GyGti&-,r— Pj-Ac-W '3 C'Z ii�s 4jK s E+ - WATE RTOWN _.. ��� 1 rss♦ �o s. RD • •r 1 L.ot 0 Lot 3 o � m f c # i i Nhhr6NIL ' '- — - �--1— �r • — - - rbT Q i H 4ATi `,� 56 58 lip •' '�''�ii � � a. o. 50 j � `.1 � fig' �\ 'i j�1� . �, 62 57 O NO. 8 4? act ca ►- to D SAC (is VA L s (�tl RW rN ark64) 7/ UJ 10 39 Ib a_�2 _ _ --- . o ,s .1 0 �21 ro AAsr 12 :�d9 s5 Res A KE v ,4 n! SW sv of S Mt 14 ((oO L F Co cte S Ldktvew C, , or q I � YIk� �.Qa VA, �3 4►0� � (5oZ5j � 1. t') 40W1 SE vclsy iolj/vj� NWAV •, 33 � y i♦ i ��� C2� �I � . 0 WEW - 3 4 _ Cm1 r C0ARESr"-:)'N6f41.6 • ?LK G. MTKA VACATED 0 ALLEY 2 A cr. 160 4 3: 0 a: CD st Ci 101 U: xN 4t 4 2 X t i LOW jk t 16 16 L4 • jj'L 4 74 AGE' -tow J. uAit fief a A A I !I A 0': AA ti O lose INS 8 an 0 ce A gj4 .00 . _0 i� - ✓ `tiS '�� 3 , 1p 0rot e W .. �i_ Its � � ,F s,b �7 • ti1 • JN t, ^ Ste: 9 ,) • i. ADD ON /r/ � � tee. i -� � • s 11► ,� .. MI/'54'50-w 43%) t (tl h n. s9 \�k 4 -- I 111 1 4 4 Z' y 23 f 21 ila a asp`- P n � r_ a ESQ f pRM �45 f • pis •_� l� , 13 .10+ 9017 •ems ;� fi. , V.... ... .e5 Res U-1 btj `I%V /j, W/Li-ww b1Vg57 .......... 2GG5.�� Ref.......... 774 5 14ty 1 < O v� U% I ,al � N O * - I� 7I y � � t• NORrN � i�.I► 4 CA t 'r ••v sca{e `• "-Iot �1 ;Ir 3555 s 3545 E x 2 17 6000 C4) ' 3 ,4;o3 144ji M .01 r or *4% o i N 2� .�� CHI PE A 141e1 refer 149Ji I z� 59/0 cv) 5920 a �- CHIPPEWA SECOND ADD. Z700 (1) A 00 . 00, 384 (it) 4 ire 41 V REG!C!T* �I Mp 4 si • L 59 - 39 SO01 . . IF E I L E E N ST 'we 0 lif 4N 74 J. 0. C, 2 Q44 0 4' *V83354vw 133,16 196.O1 ;6 Pr A 1.1 38 36 It 4% liq-:p rx 4S 3 _Lit,) I aA 74 a (45}.►�i �_ '��-4i I i\1. � `r� jam. 330 z 47147 40 6A t4 or 4 2 CIP) 2 7 2 ell 20 TO: Mayur Butler and Council Members `5->` ij r'ir t!�;P FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE: April 9, 1986 SUHJ: #1007 Robert & Carol Trapp, 4701 West Branch Road PiwJ.iminary Subdivision Approval Resolution Attached is a Resolution for Preliminary approval of the above referenced nl-.jt. A copy of your March 10, 1986 minutes are also attached. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD MARCH 10, 1986 #1.006 PALM continued Henry Dean Lindner, Bui lder 6 Agent for the applicant, was present for this matter. lie explained a proposed layout of the house interior. In order to help alleviate the concerns and amount of hardcover, Mr. Lindner presented samples of grating material that could potentially be used for the sidewalk and driveway and not be considered hardcover. He noted that they are also open to concrete runner pads for driveway use. Councilmember Frahm stated that he felt strongly regarding no additional hardcover being allowed in the 0-75' zone. Mr. Lindner stated that he felt he could maintain the existing hardcover in the 0-75' with little or no increase in the 75-250' zone. Mayor Butler stated that she would be willing to eliminate adding in the necessary back-up apron as hardcover for safety factor. After further discussion, it was determined that the back-up apron must be included in the hardcover calculations. It was moved by Mayor Butlar, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution #1936, subject to the following amendments: a) existing hardcover in 0-75' be maintained at 17.5% b) increased hardcover in 75-250' shall not exceed 29.0%. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. 41Q6? i CAROL TRAPP T BRANCH ROAD PRRLIMIMARY SUBDIVISION City Administrat:%r Bernhardson explained the request for a preliminary subdivision which meets all the standards. He noted that it fronts on the dedicated public right- of-way, but that is not developed as yet, it will be accessing on west Branch, and should be required to access on Highvi.ew Lane should that ever be developed. Carol Trapp was present for this matter. It was moved ny Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to approve the preliminary subdivision subject to staffs recommendation and subject to requiring access on Highview Lane if ever developed. Motion, Ayes 3, Nay O . A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPR"VAL FOR A PLAT AT 4701 WEST BRANCH ROAD APPLICATION NO. 1007 WHEREAS, Robert and Carol Trapp, on January 17, 1986, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a two -lot residential plat of property legally described as: The north 1320 feet of the following described premises: That part of the West 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Sect.i-)n 7, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as follows: Commencing at a point on the north line of said Section 7, distant 402.5 feet east of the northwest corner of said Section 7; thence east along north line of said Section, 369.5 feet; thence southerly to northeasterly corner of Lot 1, Bergquist and Wicklund's Addition to Bergquist and Wicklund's Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence northwesterly following northerly boundary of said Addition to intersection of line running southerly from point of beginning to point in East and West 1/4 section line of said Section 7 and distant 396.5 feet east of west quarter post of said Section; thence northerly along last described line to beginning. (Hereafter "property ); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statues 462."58 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Platting Codes, the Crono anning Commission held a public hearing on February 18, 1986, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon: and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on March 10, 1986, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of Robert and Carol Trapp noting the following findings of fact: 1. The property is located within r'.e RR-1B Single Family Rural Residential zoning district requiring a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2. The property has a total of 11.15 acres of land, 1.26 acres of which is considered wetland. Page 1 of 3. Lot 1 contains 5.45 acres of dry buildable lane, of which 2.92 acres of dry buildable land are contiguous with the proposed building site; Lot 2 contains 5.:36 acres of contiguous dry buildable land. 4. Both Lots 1 and 2 meet the minimum width requirements of 200 feet; however, the proposed lot configuration requires a street frontage variance for Lot 2, which has only 25' of frontage on the public street where 200' of frontage would normally be required. 5. Lots 1 and 2 will share a single driveway access onto hest Branch Road over the existing driveway which is on lot 2, and this will require that the appropriate access easement be granted from Lot 2 to Lot 1. 6. The City will require a Conservation and Flowage Easement over the designated wetlands on Lot 1. 7. The City will require that 40 feet of right-of-way for West Branch Road be dedicated on the Plat. 8. The City will require that 30' of right-of-way for future development of Highview Lane be dedicated on the plat, being the southerly 3G' of the property. This will leave 5.11 acres within Lot 2. 9. The City will require that a road and utilities easement be granted over the 25' wide corridor portion of Lot 2, in order to provide for any future upgrading of this driveway to private road status at such time that the level of use of the corridor reaches 3 residences. 10. At Such time that Highview Lane becomes a developed City road, Lot 2 will be required to gain access from Highview Lane. 11. Both Lots 1 and 2 have been demonstrated to have suitable sites for primary and alternate drainfields to serve the proposed houses. 12. A single family residence can he constructed on Lot 2 without the need for further variances. Pago 2 of 5 13. The proposed lot lines require a variance to the required 150' setbacks for an animal barn. The eo isting barn on Lot 1 will be 70' from the property line of Lot 2 to the . _;t. Hardships for granting of this variance include location of the existing fence lines east of the animal barn, and the fact that the barn is only 130' from the pre- existing east property boundary such that the 150' setback was not met under existing lot lines. NOW THEREFORE DR IT RESOLVED, that based upon either one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby &proves the preliminary plat for Robert and Carol Trapp at 4701 West Branch Road per the preliminary plat drawings by Gary L. Gabriel dated February 6, 1980 and as shown on the proposed final plat drawings by Gary Gabriel (undated) subject to the following conditions: 1. Lots 1 and 2 shall share a single driveway access located over the existing driveway. 2. A Conservation and Flowage Easement shall be granted over the designated wetlands on the property. 3. Roadway to be dedicated on the plat shall include 40' for right- of-way for West Branch Road and 3C' along the southern boundary of the property for future development of Highview Lane. 4. A road and utilities easement shall be granted over the portion of Lot 2 that is 25' wide. 5. At such time that Highview Lane becomes a developed City road, Lot 2 will be required to gain access from Highview Lane. The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council greeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month: A. RECORD PLAT DRAWINGS in the form of two (2) mylar copies (3 mylars if torrens property) and one (1) additional copy reduced to 1"R2001. Drawing to include: 1 ) Lot lines platted per preliminary plat drawings by Gary L. Gabriel dated February 6, 1980 and as shown on the proposed final plat drawings by Gary Gabriel (undated). 2) Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' wide along all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of internal property line as shown on the aforementioned proposed final plat drawing. Page 3 of 5 3) Dedication of a 30' corridor along the southern boundary of Lot 2 for right-of-way for Highview Lane (this will require revisions of the old final plat drawings). 4) Dedication of a 40' corridor for right-of-way for County Road No.151. 5) Dedication of wetlands per the aforementioned final plat drawing, denoted on the mylar as "Drainage Easement". B. LBGlAL DOCUMENTS required: 1) Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. 2) The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. 3) Executed Conservation and Flowage Easement; legal description to be filled out as follows: "as shown as the drainage easement appearing on the plat of (Plat name), Hennepin County, Minnesota". 4) Executed Road and Utilities Easement to be granted to the City over the 495' long, 25' wide access corridor portion of Lot 2; your surveyor should determine the proper legal description for this. 5) Draft of private access easer.,ent over Lot 2 in favor of Lot 1. C. FMS TO BB PAID: Total Due $250.00 1) Park dedication fees per current schedule, calculated as follows: 1 new lot at 5+ acres - $100.00. 2) Legal and Administrative review fees per current schedule: $150.CO. Page 4 of 5 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held April 14, 1986. ATTEST: FF Dorothy M. Hallin, City Cler Mary C. Butler, Mayor Page 5 of 5 To: Mayor Butler Mark Bernhardson, City P.. A strator Orono Council Members From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date: April 7, 1986 Subject: #1010 Duane N. Hall, 1860 Shadywood Road - Preliminary Subdivision and Variance Zoning District- I.R-1C Total Area- 39,300 square feet Total Width at Street- 143.35' Total Width at Lakeshore- 139.80' I� r ING AI r,14 � D^63 OF E.'ki" Applicat' ^*i a) ivision - lot line rearrangement to create new building site - class III subdivision will require a plat per Section 2.1.03 item 66 C (2) "subdivision involves a flexible zoning application" (variances) b) Variances 1) lot area 2) lot width 3) hardcover List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List. Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Addendum from Applicant Fxhibit F - Gustafson Letter Exhibit F - Taylor Letter Exhibit G - Seifert Letter Exh-ibit H - Shadywood Plat Exhibit I - 1958 Ordinance Exhibit J - Planning Commission Meeting 3-17-86 Exhibit X - Original Preliminary Plan Exhibit L - Revised Preliminary Plan Exhibit M - Gaffron Sketch - hardcover Staff has been anticipating the filing of a subdivision application of legally combined lots within a severed area; lots that cannot be divided without city approval because independently ear' nt cannot. satisfy 100% of the lot standards of a given zoninq distric To divide or seperate legally combined substandard lots within the C f Orono require a formal subdivision review. At the time we revised our licy in the consideration of substandard sewered lots held in joint or common ownership, it inevitable that. owners of legally combined lots that well exceed the c. u or width standards of single separate neighboring lot< developed with multiple variance approvals, would seek similar due process. zoning File $1010 April 7, 1986 Page 2 of 6 s.n the Ericson appeals application, Coun(.i 1 advised the applicant that the separation of legally combined lots in the City of Orono requires a subdivision review if the previously divided parcels cannot meet all lot standards of the current zoning district. In addition, Ericson was advised that because of the need for multiple variances such an application would be denied. Mr. Hal- has been advised of the city's position. The appli- cant has reviewed the files of the recent variance application that dealt with the variances granted to lots owned in common and reviewed as single separate lots. One of these applications involved a ;neighboring property. The applicant has filed the application because he feels his specific case is unique requiring special cons—leration. Staff has continued to advise the applicant of the city's .)ngstanding positionon subdivision applications requiring multiple variances, spec`ficly, those seeking area variances. Review of Proposed Division The applicant purchased the subject property in 1979. Lc,t 28 and part of lot 27 are part of the Shadywood plat, created approximately in 1903. (see eyhibit 11) Staff has been able to review the ownership of the property with the Registrar of Titles Office. The earlist record of the property in its present: configuration appears in 1952. The clerk was unable to tell me the date of the division of lot 27 nor of the date of the legal combination. The house was built in 1955. The zoning district at that time was residential but there were no defined lot standards for the district merely approved uses. The property has been assessed l water unit and 1 sewer unit (1 plant charge ind lineal footage charge.) Review if Variances- per revised sketch submitted by applicant after the Planning Commission review. 1 - Lot A Lot Area required = 21,780 square feet proposed - 20,850 square feet variance = 930 square feet car 4— Lot Width required = 100' proposed ,- 70.r•' variance = 29.5 or 29.5% 2 - Lot B Lot. Area required >roposed variance LL Width required proposed variance = 21,780 square feet = 18,450 square feet = 3,330 square feet or 15.2% 100' = 65.5' = 34.5' or 34.5% Zoning File #1010 April 7, 1986 Page 3 of 6 3 - Hardcover The applicant has submitted a revised sketch plar. mince the Planning Commission review of 3-17-86 (exhibit L). Hall has relocated the detached garage and trimmed the patio area back to within 2 feet of the proposed dividing line. A recent amendment (approved by Planning Commission on 3- 17-86) would allow applicant to relocate garage 10 feet off stree'C right- of-way with doors facing away from street and turnaround provided on site without the need for a variance. HARDCOVER FACTS Airphoto confirms lake is also 175' weste )f southwest lot corner, hence all area behind the east 75' setback lin_ is in the 75-250' zone as normally calculated. (Review Exhibit M) 1) Total lot area (part of lot 27 and lot 2►3) Total lot area = 39,300 square feet 0 - 75' = 10,200 square feet, 0% illowed, 0% existing 75' - 250' = 29,100 square feet,-.275allowed, 5,432 square feet or 18.7% existin-j 2) Proposed lot. A 0 - 75' (5,29' f) = 0 sf 0% 75 - 250' (15,.,150 sf) = 3890 sf or 25% allowed = *5174 sf or 23% existing = 1284 sf. cr 8% variance 2550 = house 39 = steps 159 = altered patio 615 = garage 1255 = driveway 456 = additional curve or turnaround (see dotted area on Exihbit L) 3) Proposed lot B 0 -75' (4910 sf) - 0 sf or 08 75 - 250' (13,540 sf) = 3385 sf or 25% all -wed = 3165 sf or 23% as drawn = 3265 sf or 24.2% per applicants calculations = 3300 sf or 24.3% staff's recommendation - with wider paved area a3jacent to Garage Review of Shadywood Plat - Development Pattern Plat created in 1903 with a total of 41 lots. 33 defined residential units exist today of the original 41 lots. Original Lots measuce 50' to 100' in lot width. Original lot areas range from 7,000 square feet to 26,000 square feet. Zoning or platting codes did not exist in the City in 1903. Zoning districts were established for the first time in 1950 but Zoning File #1.010 April 7, 1986 Page 4 of 6 without lot standards. In 1958, the City amendeJ Ordinance 7, the City's first subdivision ordinance approved in 1955, requiring "relatively large lots to minimize septic problems and in areas where there was exiting development of lots le:>s than 25,000 square feet in area, all new lots were to be not less than 25,000 square feet in area nor less than 120 feet in width at the building line. (exhibit I`. The house on the subject property was built in 1955. It was between the mica and late 50's tl�aL the City developed review policies to control densities. Finally, ill 1959, the City adopted a minimum lot size ordinance requiring approval by the City before a building perwit could be issued for any lot less than 1 acre in area and 140 at the building line. The Pattern of Development is as follows: a) lot widths 50'-59' 60'-79' 80'-99' 100'-150' 5orl58 16or48_ lor3% llor33% 11 of the 33 units batisfy current lot width star..srds. 12 of the 33 units would satisfy the 80% stp.ndard. 9 of the 11 units ranked at the 100'-150' widths are legally combined lots the same as the subject property. b) lot area 7,000-10,000sf 8 or 24% 18,000-22,000sf 4 or 12% 10,000-18,000sf 16 or 48% 22,001-40,000sf 5 or 15% 27% or 9 units satisfy the 80% area standards all six of he units that rank at the 22-40,000 sf contain 34,000 sf to 39,000 sf in area and are all legally combined as is the subject property. The two neighbors to the south of the subject property and the imme- diate neighbors to the north have submitted letters in opposition to the proposal (exhibits E & F & G). The Gustafsons own one of the six units that: contain over 35,000 sf in area with a total of 150 feet of lot width.(lots 29 & 30) Staff has recieved no written comments in support of the Hall application. An inspection of the property reveals a low area within lot 28 that maybe a drainageway or collection area for a small watershed. The area is not designated on the of f ica 1 maps as a wetland. Elevations may be re- quired. The Planning Commission was asked to consider the following issues: 1 - Will the applicant be deprived of a "resonable use" of his property if denied the additional residental unit? Can you make findings that would (not.) support that applicant has enjoyed a reasonable use of his property under the current ordinance. Zoning File #1010 April 7, 1986 Page 5 of 6 2 - Are there unique findings that can be ma3e involving this property' Review the pattern of development within Shadywood plat 3 - Will the creation of a new residential unit alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Onlv 18 of the 41 lots are developed as originally designed. 14 residental units were increased in size by either combinations with adjacent lots or lot line divisions and combinations. It would appear since the plat was created that there has been a tendency to realign lot lines or combine to make lots bigger. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to deny the subdivision and variance application of Duane Hall. Please review exhibit J, the Planning Commission minutes, for the back -ground discussion and findings for denial. Staff would ask Council to consider a more abbreviated review proce- dure for the "simple division" of legally combined lots. If single seperate lots can t 2 developed if they satisfy 80% of the area and width standards without Cc uncil approval than why not legally combined lots if the following findings can be met: 1 - division along existing lot. lire 2 - setbacks for existing structures can be satisfied (maybe allow up to a 50% setback variance) 3 - 80% of area standard exclusive of road rights of way and easments 4 - lot width variance not to exceed 50%... 60% 5 - consistent with current pattern of surrounding development Mike has completed a "quickie" survey of legally combined lots (not the combination of parts of lots - only whole lots) within the I.R-IC zoning district.. Gaffron 41entified 40 potential cases. Note that the location of existing st.ruc, has not been considered. If an abbreciAt.ed proce- dure was adopted 40 units would qualify (1 on Baldur Park, 2 on Shadywood and 1 or. _ cordia). All others lack the required 80% area if separated on existing lot lines. If Council favors a "simple division" process, staff would proceed with a complete survey of all sewered districts to determine the effects on existing densities and report back at a .later meeting. Zoning File #1010 April 7, 1986 Page 6 of 6 Mr. Hall's application involves the creation of a new division line - lot 27 was divided in the past - 15 feet divided off and combined with lo'_s 26 to the north. True each lot would satisfy the 80% area standa;_C and l.ot A the 80% width standard but lot B meets only 65.5% of the width s,tandaxd. Lot A has an 8% excess of hardcover. No matter how we amend review pro,:e- dures for legally combined lot: - the proposed application is a subdivision proposing a new line in order to create a new building site. Variances granted to single separate lots/commonly owned lots - or lot "ine rearrangements required by such variance approvals are not comparable: and have separate review standards. Staff concurs with the Planning Commission recomendation of denial and would add the following findings: 1 - establish a negative precedent in the review of future subdivision applications. 2 - original plat was divided prior to City wide platting and zoning ordinances - existing unit satisfies current code. 3 - applicant has not submitted supportive facts or findings that would demonstrate acceptable hardships. 4 - the applicant has enjoyed a reasonable use of his property. Council Act . - To givL conceptual direction to staff to draft a resolution of denial or approval for act -'on at your meeting of Apri 1 28th. /3 y x �f CITY OF ORONO SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM Date Rec'd aBy Fee Rec' d 04100.00 0 as-0 ---------------- - - -------l'\,r-- ----� 7- APPLICANT name _ A N N. H R L L Telephone-47 f• tqi�4 Mailing Address (F 60 S H A0V46G0 y•1 �' 9n34 PROPERTY Name S A $4 i F_ Telephone Min OWNER Mailing Address (Attach list if more than one) PROPERTY LOCATION Street Address (Y ( 4 S HAD0 (4.)0001 W NY 2JkT^% "AN Property Identification No. (P.I.D.)3 Zq 00(f Complete Legal Description to be attached to application ----------------------------------------------------- ----- ---- ---- MISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels #1 Development Size .� O Acres Dry Land •- Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check) Residential; no. of units Other (specify) Present Zoning District C. - .--------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPOSAL --.X_ Division for Tax Purposes �e _ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (M new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: _ Existing Units �r New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density IL Units per 1'p4w Acres Minimum Lot Sizes Square Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check) x Residential Other (specify) W I ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ( OVER ) • ;MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Application Completed 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 4. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (410) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by complete. Zoning Officials Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is Signature Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINIlWM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) .. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. # 1010 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date -------------------------------•------------------------------------------- FEES vv Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) I\ Preliminar Review (Class I & II Subdivisions) k YM►etad- Is Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) $150.00 $250.00 1 CU. 0& A" $300.00 plus 1 20.00/lot Final Plat Review (Class III) $150.00* *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Appi-icant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoring Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----------------------------------------- - - - Applicant'. Signature / Date Owner's Signature Date f� Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planninq Commission Meeting. Planning Cosm+ission Meetings are u.-,wally held on the third Monday of each month. Am va RUN DATE C1/17/86 EAICH 002 38 17-1I7-23 21 OD08 PROP ADDR 01795 SHADYWOOD RD OWNER NAME L i D PIIG^AM TAXPAYER LF_ROY & CELPHTE PILLGRAM NAME/ADDR E<OX 81 NAVAPRE ?IN .537 ok 38 17-117-23 Ca 0001 PROP ADOR 01825 SHAD!WO O RD Oi:NN R NAME RDBE:.T G RUl1D ETAL TAXPAYER R08EPT G PUJD f NAME/ADDR 1825 SHADYV3M RJ WAYZATA 114 5539*, 0- 38 17-117-23 24 OCC'# PROP ADDR 01880 SHABYWOC-) FD CP.'EF NAME CUaW(lOD A TIYLCR TAXPAYER OLGA M TAYLOR NAllE/ADDR 1880 SEADY1,000 RD �!AYZATA Mx1 55371 oft 38 17-117-23 24 0108 PROP ADDR 01865 SHADYVOOD RD �. OW'E4 NAME D J CORPORATICU TAXPAYEP GLENN TILLOTSGN NA4=-/ADDR 1675 SUADYWCCO RD ORONO NM 55391 1�- 38 17-117-23 24 0011 �. F?OP ACOR OW:Er. NAME- M 0 & E H GUSTAFSON TRUSTEE TA'XPAYE? EWALD & MIRIAM GUSTAFSON KAME/ADDR 1890 SHA:YW000 RD r. WAYZATA KN 55391 r 38 17-117-23 24 0014 PFOP ACDR OWNER NAME M 0 & E H GUSTAFSON TP.USTEE TAXPAYER EWALD & MIRIAM GUSTAF,ON NAME/ACDR 1893 SHAOfWOOO RD WAYZATA MN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTN INFC`7MATION Si3TEM PROPERTY OW;��5 LIST 38 17-117-23 21 0026 01800 SHADYWOL' RD JAM;:S N M!C NAUGHT�'N ET AL J Ml NAUGHTON & C 3ROOKSHAW '0 SHADYWOOD RD '.ATA MN 557,91 38 !7-117-23 24 00O2 016.'S SHADYWOOD RD G i N TILLOTSON GLEN14 R TILL07SC4 1575 SliAOYI.;000 RD OPOM:O MN 55391 38 17-117-23 24 0006 01835 SHADYWOCD RD CHRISTIANZ F TOURVILLE CHRISTIANE TOURVILLE 1535 SMkDYWOOD PO V.AYZATA !!1 55391 38 17-117-23 24 0009 M 0 & E H GUSTAFSON TRUSTEE F:1ALD & MIRIAM rUSTAF:,ON 1890 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 24 0012 M D A E H GUSTAFSON TRUSTEE EWALD & MIRIAri GJSTAFSON 1890 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 5539*, 33 17-117-23 24 0015 01820 VHAOYIo-30 RD CHARLES D PYLE JR E-;AL CHARLES A PYI-E JR 1820 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 REPORT NO. PI435401 PA,-,E S 18 17-117-23 21 0027 01810 SHADYWO,'n RD Y. P PROPE&TIES INC K P PROPERTIES INC DOUALC PETFPSON 3-' INTER'-ACHEN CT TON!:A BAi MI 55331 3A 17-117-23 24 0003 M 0 i E H GLSTAFSON TRUSTEE MIRIAM: O & EWALD N GVSTAF`GN 1390 SHADYW04v RD WAYZATA ?*I 5539' 38 17-117-23 24 0027 DIC55 SHloy-C 0 RO M%RK R SALLEN MA:-,, R SALPEN 18:5 SHA.O YWOCa RD ORONO MN 55391 38 17-117-23 24 OC1C M D & E H GL".,TArS^N TR.JSTF.E EW4iD H GUS?AF50i1 !e '0 SHADf'ZX)D R9 WAYZATA M4 553cl 33 17-117-23 24 0013 M O & E H GUSTAFSON TP,;STEE EWALD A MIRIAM GUSTAFS''44 1890 SHA Yl= ROAD WAYZATA MI 5539. 38 17-117-23 24 Oilt 01040 VADYkWD PO JOtirl J B'1R<E ETAL .i-N.4 J 1840 SHADYWC00 ROAD WAYZATA MN 55394 #1010 z■ RUN DATE 01/17/86 BATCH OJ2 38 17-117-'3 24 0017 i. PROP ADDR CIE56 SHADYWOOD PD UNER NAME M S D SEIFFQ! i4 TAXPAYER MILTON H SEIFERT JR NAME/ADOR 1856 SNAr WWD PO �. WAYZATA `:4 55391 f 38 17-117-23 24 0Q20 FROP ADOP 01910 CHAD)WOOD RD OW!ER NAME DAV:D C BIE ETAL TA'.PAYER DAV:D C BIE NAM_/ACDR 1910 S14ADYW000 PO fk WAYZATA 1^I 55391 ow op. HEK,'EPIN COLNTY PROPERTY INFOPMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWJER5 LIST 38 17-117-23 24 0018 31860 SHADY4K!OD RD FREVERT/HALL RESEARCH ASSOC OUi Fk[ N HALL 1E60 S.4ADYM000 RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 24 0021 01920 SH AD `'WOOD I LORIN A GASTERLANO WLNTNORTH CO 6716 GARFIELD AVE S I1PL5 M:l 554"3 REPORT NO. PI43WI PAGE 33 17-117-23 24 0019 C 1390 SHAE Y► OOD RD M D A E 11 GUSTAFSON TP'J'S'EE EWALD A MIPIAIM GUSTAFS"`1 I690 SPUR Y4t00: pi WAiZATA flN 5S391 TOTA1 rATCH 00Z 1,0123 I CFRTIFY THAT THE FACTS P.EPPESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TV REPRESENTATION OF INFOf4MATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON VECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN C'M4TY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY -,A?ATION, i BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIE= DATE- /��Y P, KE N. 112 SEC. 7 t T. 117v R. 23 e, M .00 C f IV I am a woo D lei '2rA To: Orono Planning Commission Members From: Duane N. Hall, 1860 Shadywood Road Date: March 12, 1986 Subject: * 1010 Sub -Division and Variance Zoning District: LR-lC - 1/2 acre area, 100' minimum lot width App:,ication: Area, Lot Width and Setback Variance SITUATION: I'm an 18 year resident of Orono. :s my household and life-style needs changed c er the years I moved to accomodate new needs, owning three hones ir orono during the period. In the past year another change has !resu'ted in a new set of living needs. This time I do iot wish to . ,e. 1 like it at the present address. I own extra land at this address and it seems reasonable to sell the existing house (which is a too large for me), and put the proceeds into building a new house designed to meet new needs including certain amenities not possible in the old house. I own lots 2.7 and 28 of the Shadywood Plat. The two lots combined are 136' by 289' .90 acres. The existing house is at the for north of the northern lot. Tt -proposed southern lot is vac excent for a poorly placed g"rpR .'o proposing a sub --division by lct -ine rearrangement to met. Ay new living needs. VARIANCES REQUESTED: Lot A Lot 0 Lot Area - Required 21780 sf 21780 of 80% of Area 17424 at' 17424 91 Proposed 20850 sf 18450 of Var i nnrc 930 a f 4% 1:130 s t' - 15% Lot Width Required 100, 100' 80% Width 80, ti0' Proposed 70.5' 65.5' Varihrnre 29.5' 29.6% 34.5' 34.5% Setbncks Required 10/10 10/10 % 8/ 8 H/ 8 Existing 7/10 Proptteed - 15/10 Variance 3' 30% none Hardcover Required 25% Max 25% Max Variance none nont• THIS IS A UNIQUE SITUATION -- STRICT RNFORCEMNT OF THE ZONING; CODE 11MLD CAUSE UNDUE HARDSHIP UNIQUE TO THIS PROPERTY - THE END RESULT OF' THIS SUB--r:IVISION AND VARIANCE IS WITHIN Tl*,' INTENT OF Tt*s CGMt'REHENS I VR PLAN ADCI'T8D AND MADE: LAW BY ONV I NANCE • 172, 1975. e EXHIBITS: 1. West Shore of Crystal Bay 2. 16 New Properties Precedent 3. Variances by Lot Merit 4. Property Owner Rights ern, ing this applicant's request for lot line rearrangement and ciriance is rem • able and: THt' %Pill I .E:D OTS ARE: CONSISTENT WITH THE AREA DEVELOPMENT AND r,+, . "'1 "Y OF THE LOTS IF THE: AREA The prot . are consistent with 7 out of 10 developed lots in the antra, _y are admitedly 5 to 10 feet wider and larger in area than mw, «3f the lots but consistent never -the -less. I direct your attentio:: at this tioint to exhibit sl which shows that most lots in tlix area of the applicant's property me equal to or smaller than the proposed lots in both lot area and lot width. SUBDIVIDING PAIRED LOTS WILL NOT CVVATP' A BUILDING BOOM A zoning concern that has been considered in the past is the contention thnt granting variances and sub -divisions to !djncent lots under common ownership will result in one -for -one increases in nt-w homes in the. area. The data in exhibit s2 cler ly shows this is not the case because at least thrt -quarters of the paire(' s in the area have expensive homes centered on the pair of lot , crossing the shared lot line, leaping no rum tir building additional hoses. COMMON SENSE; . ') REASONING PRiVAI1S IN UNONO PLANNING RECOMMENDATIONS AND COUNT' I ', APPLICATIONS OF THE COMPRi. '%.NS I VN ZONING CODE This applicant respectfully requests t.h:• C, 3eission study exhibit t 3 nttached, review the criteria detai.-_ the.n, and send forth reasoned, relevant findings (.see those listed) -nd a reCOMMendation that the sub -division rind variance be. grant #-d A DENIAL OE MY REQUEST IS ARBITRARY ANC) i NEQlll TARI.F TREATWNT PRODUCING AND UNNE:CESSAHY HARDSHIP ::xhlbit. s 4 de•tai .s believe this to be true. More istxortrrnt , ®y knErvledge mr-4 ire tit and wrong tells se that I have a ri.+,ht to build a new ..use e I and 1 -►wn as 1 ong as my act i one are consistent with the de of the area I lives in and I conform 'o and approximate what of doing, in the area where 1 live. THANK YOU FOR t:ONS1DERI1k; 'r...S REQUEST EXHIBIT g 1 THE WEST SHORE OF CRYSTAL BAY IS 50' AND 60' LO'"S WITH A FEW COMBINED My property at 18W Shadywood is near the center of the west shore. The near half --mile north and half -mile south c.f my property holds 41 lots and over 60% are 60' lots or lens. An additional half -mile either way along Shadywood (south) and North Shore Drive adds anotfr 50 lots and of the 91 total lots, 66% are 60' or less. In this area, 44 of the ° its are 50' or less in width. The modal density is 3.0 single fe units per acre. In some ways, it is a high density area, as w:.tk. ....e Seifert property with 6.0 single family units per acre (which happens to be next to my property on the north,. Only 19 of the 91 properties, 21%, conform to the current zoning standard of 10(' lot widths. That is, 79+' re sub --standard. Only 11 of the 91 lots, 12%, are 112 ac.r .•ger. Clearly, the character of this area is narrow lots of less than one- half acre in size; 50'and 60' lot widths and 160' to 150' lot depths r!iiiK ng from .15 to .20 acreo are very common The zoning standards of 100' wide and 112 a ---re lots ar- pimply unrealistic in the arer where I live. EXHIBIT i 2 SIXTEEN NEW PROPERTIES ON CRYSTAL BAY - A NEGATIVE PRECEDENT??? J. Mabusth, in a memo to the Council oci October 25, 1984, reviewed the properties along Crystal Bay and came to the incredible finding "hat there were 16 commonly owned pairs of lots that could seek division, resulting in 16 new residences on Crystal Bay, if the owner of a similar pair of lots at 1620 Shadywood were granted the variance needed to build o►! one of the lots. I walked a mile north of my house at 1860 Shadywood and found eight pairs of commonly owned lots (using the plat maps with outlined pairs cf lots provided by the A ty); in less distance to the south I found another eight pairs of lots. The pairs of lots ranged from 8O'to 150' wide. Most were 100' or 120' since the original platting along much of Crystal Bay was in 50' and 60' lots. Of sixteen commonly owned properties, one already had two houses, one on each lot, three pairs of lots involved one vacant lot next to a lot which held a house. The three vacant lots were clearly buildable. In TWELVE CASES the existing houses WERE CENTERED on the two lots in such a way so as to cross the shared lot line leaving no room to add an additional structure. For the Mabusth "n.�gative precedent" to occur, 13 of 16 property owners would have to destroy 13 existing homes worth an average of $100,000 each to acquire 13 new lots with less value than the homes that were dcau eyed to produce the new lots. This simply does not make sense. But it. did influence the Council which in later findings noted that the LR-IC patterns of development in the Navarre area offered the potential for 43 new properties if the application in question were approved. U is is of course absurd. The facts are that if all of these ,1.ert.y owners were encouraged by the city to tear down their existing homes so that they could acquire a new lot to build on ... most would refuse resulting in less then a half dozen new homes. And where is the evidence that the Crystal day / Nf+varre er>aA cannot accomodate a half dozen new homes" EXHIBIT * 3 JARIANCES VIA INDIVIDUAL LOT MERIT - LOTS IN SEWERED AREAS There exists numerous zoning file cases that evidence the Council's meticulous and judicious application of the zoning standards but one stands out as being recent and similar to the current application. By resolution * 1719 granting the following variances to music pal zoning code section 10.25, subdivision 6 (B) the council appeac!d to establish the reasonable procedure of approving lots on individual merit. It approved lots that (1) were at least 55' in width anti (2; were 77% of the required square footage, and (3) were in sewered LR-1C single family lakeshore residential zoning districts. The Council noted uniquely important detail such as the property is consiste-•` in area with other developed lots and approximates the narrowest lots in the neighborhood. In summary, the Council acted on the following Planning Commission findings: a) No available land on either side of property. b) The property is sewered and watered. c) Additional variances would not be needed. d) No negative effects on public health, safety, and welfare. e) The variance is consistent with the area's development. f) No future need for hardcover and setback variances. g) The conditions of the land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. h) The conditions do not apply generally to ether land in district. i) Granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. j) Granting the variances will not in anyway impair the health. safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. k) Granting of the proposed variances will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. The City Council is to he commended for acting in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and CoW,rehensive Plan of the City. Without including unnecessary detail at this point. suffice it to any th^ Council's Conclusions, Orders and Conditions were appro- priately comprehensive and considered. EXHIBIT * 4 A DENIAL OF THIS REQUEST VIOLATES MY CIVIL AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS In the past few years numerous property owners have received permits to expand existing homes and build new homes on sub -standard lots in the area in which I live: Next door to me there are three single family residenses on a 75' lot - the owner was given a permit to add more living space and hardcover. Down the street a few houses, a new house just went up on a 60' lot and next door to that a sidelot setback of 3.1' was OK. There are literally dozens of these situations recorded in Orono since the new zoning codes went into effect in 1975. Why? Because the City Council, in to defensive move to counter an IDS initiative to build high density housing in the Navarre area adopted overly stringent zoning laws in the area. Here are some of the results since that 1975 action: VARIANCES GRANTED IN ... Width: Area: Setback: Resolution * 1246 40% 10% - Resolution * 1246 40% 7% 15k/40% Resolution * 1719 45% 23% - Resolution * 1670 29% 40% Resolution * 1718 39% 31% - Staff, in considering an ..Oplication in the Shad wood Plat, stated: "staff would suggest th-it minimum realistic lakesho:re 1, sizes in LR-IC range from 55% to 75% of 1/2 acre" or .27 to !s. In summary, almost all the remodeling and building permits issued in the area 1 live in were `ranted using a variety of variances, variances in lot width, areas, setbacks, hardcover, etc. T(- denv me the same consideration and freedom is arbitrary, capricious ana wrongful, n deliberate abuse of discretionary power, resulting in an unnecessary hardship and inequitable treatment. 1"Roe-uvER oN yrfoPo�E-�� 4,07-,l lv�+ xiA.ec�.•. s sat�owc:h tv i q , Cut,��E�.1 T LGN�nlF, S?��ip�A3 I OTNI. L/IArf 7b7r 731_24v' 250'+ Arc'rtia zpTN AREA /2427 2SI2- 7) q) (SO IFx/sTi�vS ffvuSE — 2SS�' _ 2Sjo D2tVE. — b'ZS r'pso /307S' 6 l� i?A t - — ;fie p to td PAi/ v �� is r�J Z %� — 1-?q 3 6 y 9� (I �So� �'01► 9 -7p <0 U-uDq-A i6 < 7. i Air p'cJ'c�r A �� nuSE/N;s+�;,i ,Y. 7�GG — 1cx,ro a peture, 3cc. '7. 6y 1,7e 0 .CoT.t /r► 4 3 C ottiidIAZb 101oc- 3y3c %i/N w i�+u �� /�►�C GVE �. ,SgSO 3S'jv y�2G 'uts7iPY7 t PACvNr1E U "- 6l47 / \'<G"vep> uNoF-e- ff-Am, o-ta <7 17� 4 cs %gip �f �, Of 111�D6 R < I q1; "TOt v4,'tAS i 3�1,3cco-7'&7'Mo&,t'Tt.) S ..:3�sE.�' .li�� 'ME SNt�?t1i ,Lo,r Arrve To .t. EsAoiA4, IF 4.+'!E v �'c ti� T�►t d✓ Z*60.LU W•A.) µAfDe&V i.-2 is utsS TkA N 7k & J7PV40ANW /IvNKcawl. /6 P�l�2f D C O t PR0/4c�?'r E [iti-f— NoRTH 4 +cRt. ILI 07 Ste st, Noe rot CNoA4 poor- - (edr1 o -4+ 1NApiv%&A o o � y- u•�.��J .� , c ..... �.. tom,....`, .S, .-, t _. � G i'he P1unni: City of Orono R6x 66 Crystal B,jy, Gentlemen: Cor�mi:�sicn 55323 Thank ,you for the notice regarding the Public :searing to be Meld March 17, 1986 re.warding Duane Hail's application for c-i proposed residential subdivision reiuiring variances located at 1960 Shadywood Itd. 4e own the second house South of Duane Hall's cn lots 29 and 30. we also own eight tracts of property across County Rd. 19 West of our home. This includes gill the property alona, County Pd. 19 from the Glenn Tillotson properVty to the Coffee bridge. We are well aware of V'r. !;,ill's property and the adjoin- ing properties and we strongly feel that Mr. Hall's pro- posal. is r -t in the beat interests of the neiv_,nbor. Hood, the reneral area or our beautiful Lake N'innetonka. . rystai Bay and Shadywood goad use already overcro),:ded and we strongly oppose Mr. Hall's proposal. we also object to the concept of' creation of a new buil.d- ina lot which may be substandard in several respects, namely, lot area, £rontaee on both the road and lake side and perhaps in surfaced area. Orono has high building code standards but they are meaningless and cannot ac- complish their object of maintaining; the high -1up.lity com- munity we all desire if re) nests of Mir. 11all's nature are approved. In our opinion it reverses Orono's past strict en-forcement of building site standards and if approved opens the door to countless other property owners to re- quest variances. T,astly, a granting of a variance as reiutsted by Mr. :Tall would be a direct reversal of the Orono policie3 ns we have observed in recent years, to up�.rade properties and to limit the building; on substand- ard lots in our neighborhood. 4e re,;lipst trip Orono 11anning :'omrnission disapprove "'r. Hall's re lest. .respectfully, taf s or) _.Wald iI. ',ustc.fson •' V190 -hadywood 1A. J _Ayr:ita, fAnn. 553=l o w CRY 0E G �j --%)1t� A- /c S L- F OL s �- 1' ' J tOlt- X 4 r fa4v ae( 4 G� March 1/4, 1986 The Planning Commission City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 To Whom It May Concern: We are responding to the notice we recently received concerning the Public Hearing regarding the subdivision of Duane Hall's property. We live directly north of Mr. Hall at 1856 Shadywood Road, and feel compelled to add our objection, along with those of our neighbor's, to his proposal. We object to Mr. Hall's proposal for the following reasons: 1. We are already aware of the Commission's feelings about overcrowding on Crystal Bay - why add another building to an already populated aiea you are trying so hard to keep within bounds of certain standards? 2. We also object to building on a lot that may already be substandard in area, lake frontage and road frontage. 3. We, too, have experienced the high h lding code standard's of the Orono Planning Commission when we appearec fore you six years ago. We can only hope that the wisdom of the Commission will he consistent with its past actions. 4. Also, giving in to Duane Hall's proposal would only encourage others to seek variances that would be in direct conflict with what the Commisssion wishes to see for the area, and for what the people wish to see for the area. We request that of Orono Planning Commission disapprove of Mr. Hall's request. Respectfully, M Seifert, Jr. Dorianne E. Seifert 1856 Shadywood Road Wayzata, MN. 55391 i v - 5 EG. 7 22 �"' Kit• it ( 4'r Go RO No 19 S••OPE I lot --� - l _•y — --� 1. •'{V.-T �b —:►,.,,� , — ti MAP!_EuATE M, \` It,•i , - INLET04 it JW4 CN it �j .�• _ +r p + Q. • !+tN It VIN �. 40 `y MAPLCGATE ♦ n N • • INl`ET�'/ Kim AY Aw me la . t .203 24 r l l• Orono .,... ... ..... .... ,, ... The Village Council of the Vil- lrae of Orono ordains as follow;: ction 1. Said Ordinance 7 is h...by amended as follows: (a.) Add the following para- graph entitled "Fiscal Policy" just after the section entitled "Pur. Pose" and before the sections en- titled "GENERAL REQUIRE. MENTS"; "Fiscal Policy In the interests of the general welfare of the entire commun- ity, the Council, in considering any proposed subdivision will adhere to a sound fiscal policy, having in mind the relationship of probable building values to governmental costs, so that the, projected tax revenue from the subdivision may be expected to bear a reasonable portion of the increased govtrnrr - 'sl costs attributable to ' .. i1na1 de- i termining factor , he the general welfar. of the Village ! as a whole . nd not tae question of wheth i or not the proposed subdivision may be expected to Pay its ow way; but the er. I' 1 tent to which the subdivls.o may or may not be expected ' } pay its own way is one of ti: `m ets which the Council ay asider." (b.) Amend the first pi.rag;raph l of section entitled "Lots" to read !as follows: ,.Lo. 1. Residential Lots, as to size j and area, shall he governed by I and subject to ti.e ,)olicy of the Village Council. Such policy, for the promotion of health, welfare, sanitation and the like, is declared to be in favor of relatively large lots so that 'problems involving s e w a e e, drainage and cess pools may be minimized and so that the healthy, open and uncrow-#psi aspect of the Village may L maintained. Fi rther +he policy' shall be that ill lots conform in area tc the ^ ristina lots in the general area of the proposed subdivision. Except in the case of very small subdivisions in- volving less than ten lots ir. an area where existing; lot sizes are clearly less than 25.000 square feet, no lots shall be less than twenty-five thousand (25,000) l square feet in area. nor narrow-! -r 0.^,i one hundred twenty, ! 20) feet at the building hne,i. { ' ,exclusive of any easement for' ` driveway purposes (utilitift easement excepted;. ' (c.) Strike the ast three pa;,. graphs of section entitled "Put:':c Ogren Spaces" and substit, the following: '144 / .-) icy of the Villag;e�CounciI that in all new subdivisions appro- priate public open spaces shall. be dedicated for public use, ch spaces being ip addition to e property dedicated for streets, alleys or public ways. The policy is that at least one such public open space shall be provided for approximately each ten lots in the subdivision. The area of such public open space or spaces shall depend upon the average lot size in the i subdivision, the following table to serve as a guide: Percent f 'ubdivis.,.n Average to be in Lit Size Public Open Space 25,OOC sq. ft. to % acre si acre to I acre I acre to 1 % acres 5'6. over 1 % acres 0% "The area taus dedicated should be either usable area or area which can be put into .usable shape by the subdivider. The subdivider shall leave land so dedicated in a conaition sat- isfactory to the Vil. . Council. "At the 4:..cretion of the V il- :abe Cou;icil if the circum- stances justify such action, the ly requirement for public open spaces may b.: waived cr mocii- fled upon payment by the sub- fivider to the Village of an rop-late sum o1 money to be i' ...ed by the Village for the cre- ation or maintenance of othe. suitable public park area with- in the Village." (d.) Amend the Ant sentenc of paragraph entitled ''Interior; Streets" tc. read as follows: "Interior Streets The subdivider shall rr i ..a and gravel streets, and shall if required by the Village Council, blacktop 'l.e streets, all at his own expense." Section 2. This ordinance shall be published in the Minnetonka Herald, publis:.-' at Wayzata, Minnesota, rand sl All be effective immediately upon such publica- tion. Passed by the Village Council of the Village of Orono this loth day of February, 1958, by a vote of 4 yeas and no nays. Herbert R. Rusa, Mayor Attest: O. IL John=*. dark (2/13, '30 ti fl, MIWJ1�E•:S OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 17, 1986 ATTENDANCE 7:30 P.M. The Orono Planninq . omwission n t on the above date ,. , .h the following members prey Chairman Kel ..,-y-, 1111ahan, Bellows, Taylor, Go, ten & Rovegno. McDonald was absent. The toLlowing repress- ` 1 the City staff: Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Z..,sistant Zonin-.; Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder Peterson. Council representative Frahm was also present. QHADYWOOD DUANE N. HALL ROAD ?RELIMINARY SUBDIVISION b PUBLIC HRARING 7:32 - 6:20 Zoning Mailing VARIANCE Administrate. Mabusth noted the Certificate of and AffidaviL of Publication. Zoning Administrator Mabustn reviewed the applicatio for subdivision - lot line rearrangement to create a new building site. She reviewed the requested variances vs. the requirements of Lot A: Lot area 4.2%, Lot width 39.5%, anc. "ardcover 5.3%; ',got B: Lot o_w:rea 15.2%, Tot -width _)%, ant: hardcover 5.7%; Setback for ac •sory struc' ;Ba ed on the assu.+,ptions of reloce: i )n L! garage ...id shone• ed patio). Duane N. Hall was prra-:r.t for this matter and qur 3 why a second sr,.,, ; ' . A would be considered hardc,_ Zon4.r.q Administratoi Gaffron stated that the City Council considerm it hardcover because it has been four.._' that it had a F,_ te..tial of havinc plas1 • ()r other materials underneath creating the actual r Technicall';, a ease c.3uld oe made that certain spacing etc. yid ground underneath allow most of the wate _o drain through. Chiirmc lley stated that consi' s a@ hardcover .-: Meer, the dec • - , ; n �f the C � �� I ana should not `)e mz, a., i ss at this time, _ _ ._o :d be somethinv pl icarit w -)uld have to d_s( .iss when the appl.£c -it, ques before 'te Ccu -ci 1. Mt. i. 11 a difference in his har(_cove- -' cu.lat .Loi-.s :•s. staf f's -,91cu : ation. His c�-I c.ulations new Lot A 1% he.i.dco-r- varia-.:,7e and T.ot B 0% hardcover v -lri.,nce. t1r, notes at hr would like to work with l f .i Vi .iscrep.-. ry. .:onin:; r,:injnistrator Ma th sty .d that st fel,_ comfortable with their hardcover ca culafions. C!).irman Kelley a-�,.ed applicant to address h.s h3rdsnip(s) tv :,as- thisrequest •lpon. '- I n -TES OF TH-E PLANK' IG COMMI SS.i o)N MVE PI N. U ELD MARCH 17, 198f. 11010 DUANE N. RALI. contir Submitt_ of proper: with. >lat m:�p, Mr. Ifa11 indicated different sets ,:!s to use to compare his proposed division Regarding n1,1.:lica7,t's hardships, Mr. Hall stated that he envisioT,nd ' ving in a house on his extra lot and hie hardship is living in a high density area where the bulk of the lots are substandard. Chairman Kelley asked the public to address their feelings regarding ti,is proposal. Glenn T�lotson, 1875 Shadywood Rd., stated that he would iike to go on record as disapproving of the proposal and feels Orono shou' ' he consista^t =:r.i' their ordinAances and not "cave in". John C. Ericson, 1620 Shadywood x.d., stated th>:t he felt clearly platted lots with sewer and water should be allowed to be developed. He stated *-hat if a property cwner is not allowed to build on these tots they should be taxed only $1 .or the- unusable l.o' s. i Ta, 1 or of 'ol A Avenue � , Minneapolis (not is ated to Plz. Commission rr. .nber iul Taylor), representing h : :er, Mrs. Durwood A. T ylur of 1880 Shadywood, re- ;t.. ,.ed their objections and concerns as noted in Mrs. T, ylors letter regarding preserving the valley, view, L-id character of the ^eighbort7od. In addition, he (I that any major e)o _-vation o' appli- car►ts propel.-Y .could endanger at :east two o, their trees. He noted that h .r, late father's intent w.;en he purchased the property in 1952 was to move into an area that had space and by paying property taxes on th.at r.r,,,ce, preserve that space. Ile state(" '-hat compromise r tie zoning ordinance would create --at incentive hers to follow suit. Mrs. Durwood A. Taylor stated that shortly after Mr. Hall purchased his property he apprcached her hushand requesting to buy a t', loot strip of property and was turned down. She no'_ed that her late hisbar)ca instructed I ier nc• to sell any of their property. She stated that Mr.. Hall approached her again in January 1986 to-nc^ur-- aye Mrs. Taylor to sell sonic property. She s`_a� -d that she has no intention of selJinr �r property. ,John Ericson expiazner? the pai,t 40 yenrs cf changy s that resulted in these 40-6 wi_dc lots and he stated h , does n,,lt sce how the City can continue to deny these reques' s 2 • ' MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 17, 1986 #1010 Dl . NE N. 1iALL con' -Trued In response to the Taylors comments, Mr. IlaI1 stated that he did in fact offer to buy some of Mrs. Taylors property but it would not solve his problem a th zoning laws at this time. He also assured that nc da- ,ge would be done to her trees. Chairman Kelley read into the record a letter to the Planning Commission dated March 14, 1986 from Milton & Doreen Seifert of 1856 Shadywood Rd., indicating their objectic ns for the following reasons: 1)overcrowding on Crystal Bay 2isubstandard lot 3)City should remain consistent with past actions 4)encouraae others (setting precedent) to seek variances w' ch .iould be in direct conflict with what the Commissior. .nO people wish to see for the area. There were no other person present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. Planning Commission member Taylor stated he felt uncom- fortable with aggravating a situation that within a neighborhood already rias a number of substar•dard lots, an area that appears Lo be conjested, and feels it is hard to deal with the concepts of grandfathering when there is no legal basis. He felt it was not an appropriate variance �o approve. CAllahan stated that he aqreed with Taylors comments and staffs recommendation to deny. Rov`gno agreed that he was uncomfortable with this app- lication noting that the material from Mi Hall was persuasive along with Mr. Erics(.--'3 comments. He noted that one thing that troubles him .,rout such applications is that if there had been a snack on a separate lot they would be approving it as a substantial property right. Ile noted staffs memo vs. Mr. :fall's material, it appears th, t either this lot is exar_l- l y like all th? rest or very very different, somethi that should be recon- ciled. In addition, he feels • ..at it ie a small lot and a very difficult situation. Bellows stated that based on Mr. Hall's ma' als submitted she felt that the only hardship was a tinancial one which was not a valid hardship. She questioned the fact that Mr. Hall noted that his present hOUSP is too large but however the proposed house (50'x40' 7-story plus basement) appears to be larger than his prrgent home. ' MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAHc.,f 17, 1986 #1010 DUANE N. HALL continued Mr. Hall staled that he does not plan to build that large of a house, that is merely the building envelope indicated on his drawing. Bellows still questioned the lack of hardship involved and felt uncomfortable in that she fin(:a -,o uniqueness of this situation which is needed to rule on. Goetten stated that she understood applicant's concerns however she felt by approving this it would only make a bad situation worse and also found no hardship involved. Chairman Kelley concurred with the comments ^de by the other Commission members and felt that this lot was too substar. lard . It was _.ved by Taylor, seconded by Callalan, to recommend denial of this application based on the following: 1) Multiple variances sought are excessive. 2) Applicant has not submitted sufficent evidence of a hardship which is unique to that particular circumstance. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that this application would be presented before the Council at the April 14, 1986 meeting. #1011 EXCELSIOR BAI YACHT CLUB DLERING ISLAND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT i VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 8:29 - 9:07 The Affidavit of Publication was -ed. Representing the Excelsior Bay Yacht Club was Doug Klint. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that Deering Island was designated as having 6.5 acres and approved as a conforming lot and privvy all permitted and conditional use permits within the RS District. However, a recent survey of the island confirms that there are only 2.65 acres which would require an area variance of 2.35 across or 47%. Doug Klint showed the c nal plat From 1913 which proved it to he 6.5 acre£ gina11y. He explained that the proposed plan is for :: recreational area to be ;used by the Commodore Club of the Yacht Club, and that they intend to control the number of club members on the island. fl Certificate of Surrey fc- Duane N. Nall in Lots 27 t 28, Shadyrood Hennepin C----rty, Minnesota -23 O v 0 t - K -269. 4.5 - I., Via "" 1 Ns+r9~ G ..•mot• O. J/J to♦ Rv.....r. Aare f;w ,t i y1' •(, �' E'. nt me`µ li -- —_ .i�I`Ll.; � w '. • � � - �- .�+ � �-111 i . 7. r , N 14 _. asw'Sj i. ` ; SD•O 1 rot - 2S15.4! FRCP• :IL � O 0 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct represe,taticn of a survey of the DoundKies of e Lot 27 except the North 15 feet, said 15 feet being measured a: right angles from the Nor" line N of said Lot, and Lot 24, all in Shadywood and the location of all existing bulldings and a drivo- ray and patio thereon. It does not purport to show other ipm>rcveinents or encroaclow t, • Date : 1-71-86 Scale: 1" - 3J' a : Iron: varker COFFIN a GROWERo, INC. mart S. arOn .erg i C Gon?on R. Coffin L1C. NO. bo',�a Enr ne.rc { Lend Survavors LOnu Lime, ' inneSOU u.< o w.,rat r . A %i[.'.>-wity Mssw►wr-Mawaa/ ,IcTt�cttal Ya.eies�s+ •\ 150 Pr 1 D�C.x3 �N 1 as . s.� sceraa - Y: ,744 F _ U A/OaL C .111^ m4d0i s 4. pTNFQ TMP�iwviM[w! S, 1 ' [.%iiiwRM To P1i ti►v � a faJ i+t.,, i Certificate of Survey _ for Duane N. He! I L.M.- In Lots 27 i 28. Shadywooa Hennepin County, Minnesota w..n. t„ D..r• R27 1, r.. SS S , u. 6D.- 1 St 1� LT "i � \ : `` t r 4.4 L _ l \ 0 S !1> i •Ja' •i � Alsr MMaa1 �• r �n ii.�i gin`, •r *• �—/•O •-1 I�Oi � 1 V' 1i 1 Sze c - - at:..aai<n o 1 hereby certify that this is a true and Correct representation of a survey of the podridaries of n H•+ase /6eo S•r. Lot 27 except the North 15 feet. said 15 feet being measured at right angles from the North line of saiO Lot, and Lot 28, all in Shadywood. arw! the location of all existing butldiegs and a drive- » `. way and patio thereon. It does not purport to show other iaprovewntz ^r encrowtuaRts. " URe�t 4L:r COFFIN t G"ERG, INC. �16 +/ £5, Scale: V - W Gordon R. Coffin tic. No. bolt/ + Date 1-21-66 7 M•*OWs: i�.ineer, Land M�.Nc • Iron marker s A d Surveyors AW~ 7* t/► A ' on Lake, Minnesota AVaI As PWW— I'faR•V+p i I hereby certtTy t Lot 27 a i*pt the zScale: a . :ron marker VV Certificate of Surve• for Duane 9. Mall in Lots 27 A 28. Shadywoo0 I:as•t...' henneprr. County. Minnesota tt { L27 1 C� C. t u e roe ? h....... Lo s� 1 i — � i� r, r• O , »o. : r fa,.h Ito ro - • 21.5-41-- 7 this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of h 15 feet. said 15 feet being measured at n,;^' angles from the North Ifer �. all in Shadywood and the location of all e., ' buildings and a do yw- 1� does not purport to show other improvements v. •wncro.xheents. \ COMN i GR0116fRG. 14C. /�� ��� T-7 Gordon R. Cof!In Uc. No. 50:,•' fnglrw-r� i Lane! Surr-yors "Al: ! .tk.. M; nnesuta IL6foe atCa. N_. O 1 . A f1af.+� brl.ay /t w 1 N i ANT t rtria Za►oe sn I" \ 1, KGKi aNW / aI � l.+o il4•..A. -N1` `. 51 A. wILL kWr Sta![O .000 IS FT 5\, r i + ' 3, ,Tsae:/�j.. tIMQ![ R !7a►Gne,� S � ,i O7'MRQ T*^PRavtMtwr-4, �? �RfMEABIc jtt Jr p' iNG 1/ DUANE N. HALL 1860 SHADYWOOD ROAD WAYZATA, MN. 55391 Mayor Butler and Orono Council Orono, Minnesota Dear Mayor: r April 11, 1986 I have been unexpectedly and unavoidably called to California in connection with my employment and will not be able to return until Wednesday, April 16. Please consider- my application *1010 in my absence and vote on its approval. I know you will give it the same consideration you would extend if I could be with you. I am requesting a subdivision of my two lots by lot line rearrangement (recommended by Ms. Mabutsh). I would prefer a less expensive method but have been told by staff that none exists in Orono. I have also :,een infon*ed that the "Council has never approved a subdivision with variances Never -the -less: 1. The variances I request are minor variations from standards. 2. A valid hardship exists. 3. My proposal is like numerous other applications approved. 4. To use my land in this way is a my land title right. I am confident the Council will act on my application according to its merit and not penalize me according to the merit of its action or lack of action taken in the past. Thank you for your considerations and approval of this application. cc: Orono Staff Respectfully, Duane N. Hall !, 744, %�-- t `T: 'r: ":"J ✓I To: Mayor Butler, Orono Council Members From: Duane N. Nall, 1860 Shadywood, Orono Date: April 10, 1986 Subject: g 1010 Sub Division and Variance Planning Commision Meeting - March 17, 1986 REVIEW OF FINDINGS AND COMMISSION ACTION Data presented by the Orono staff and the myself indicate the proposed subdivision and resulting variances ARE NOT EXCESSIVE. o '"he Mabutsh March 11 memo states that 66% of the Shadywood Add'n lots are 60 to 75 foot or less in width. The lots I propose by sub- division are 65 and 70 feet in width. o The sane memo states that 69% of the Shadywood Add'n lots are 18,000 aq ft or less. I have proposed a sub -division that produces two lots that are well over 18,000 sq ft in area. o The Mabutsh memo considers only 41 lots in the Shadywood Add'n. I presented findings showing: In the one half mile nort' anA south of my property, 60% of the lots are 60' or less in width. Within a mile each way of my property 66% of the 91 lots are 60 foot or less in width. 79% of the lots in ■y area are sub --standard in width. 88x are less than one --half acre in area. In fact, THE VARIANCES I PROPOSE ARE MINIMAL. Each lot is almost one- half acre in area (larger than two-thirds of the lotti in my neighbor hood); each is wider than two-thirds of the lots in the area. Lot A is 5% over the hardcover permitted but this is only because a•v property has lc:.e on both sides and by prior Council action, "Lakeshore on two sides of the property creates a hardship" .. "conditions existing that are peculiar and do not apply generally to this zoning district" (Reference Res. g 1655). Lot B conforms to the hardcover standards. There are no setback variance& requested. The March 11 memo cites the 195H Ordinance 7 Amendment as evidence -hat the City p licy was to impose large lots on areas where small lots existed. Please note Exhibit ail f.4-t..s forth two policies: (1) large lots only for the promotion o► health, welfare, sanitation -- solving problems involving sewage, cess pools, etc. WE NOW HAVE SBMBR IN MY AREA. Policy •2: "all lots conform in ARkA to the existing lots in general area of pro►,xmed subdivision." MY PROPOSED LCTN CONFOW 'N AREA. APPROVAL OF THE SUB -DIVISION WILL. NOT ESTABLISH NEGATIVE PRECEDENT... as the Mabutsh memo states. Ms. Mabutsh states: "six potential residential units would be added to an alreadtr congested neighborhood." She is referring to paired lots commonly owned. Of the six lots she references: 3 properties have clearly buildable, extra lots (one is mine) 2 properties have $,.)0,000 eighty foot homes centered on the two lots making it economically unrealistic to add another home. 1 romonly owned pair already holds two homes (as I am proposing) And she presents no evidence that our neighborhood is congested. THERE IS NO AVAILABLE LAND ON EITHER SIDE OF MY PROPERTY The lot to the north is fully developed. And Mrs. Taylor, to the south, has no intention of selling a portion of her surplus land. TWO UNIQUE HARDSHIPS ATTEND MY PROPERTY. One, mentioned above, my property has lake on either side. Second, it is the only property in the Shadywood Add,n, for a mile in either direction for that matter, that is next to a high --density development. The lot adjacent to my property on the north has a density of 6.5 residential units per acre. My property has a current density of I 1 units per acre. I am proposing a density of 2.2 units per acre, more in keeping with the surrounding area - particulary the high -density development to my immediate north. This clearly ext-rt.lishes A HARDSHIP UNIQUE TO MY PROPERTY, a hardship noted in my memo to the Planning Commission but apparently overlooked. REVISED PLANS REDUCE HARDCOVER AND SIZE OF BUILDING ENVELOPE Since the Planning Commission meeting I have revised my plans to conform as much as po9sible to the standards and the existing neighborhood. I agree to relocate the garage on lot A and t-ut d+•�n the patio that overlaps the lot line. Furthermore, 1 guarantee my building plans will not, in any way, damage the neighbor's tree. TO BUILD ON MY EXTRA LOT IS A LAND TITLE. PREROGATIVE - A PRIOR RIGHT BASED ON NEI4HBORHOOD BUILDING r�jSTOMS AND RECOGNITION OF PRECEDENCE. Custom and ample precedence has been established by prier Ordinance Amendment and Council resolutions. I am proposing nothing mote than numerous other Orono property owners have done in the past with Council 9pproval (Reference Rxhibits 3 and 4, Hall memo 3/12;86). HAVE 4 HAPPY DAY' Orono _. The Villas'.e Council of the Vil-I .1'"C of Orono ordains as follows: ction 1. Said Ordinance 7 is 11..-hy amended as follows: (a•) Add the following para- rr."Ph entitled "Fiscal Policy" just after the section entitled "Pur- pose" and before the sections en- titled "GENERAL REQUIRE- MENTS": "Fiscal Policy IIn the interests .,f the general welfare of the entire commun- ity, the Council, in considering any proposed subdivision will 2dh;:,� it) a sound fiscal policy, having to mind the relationship i of probable building values to 1 j governmental costs, so that the projected tax revenue from the subdivision may be expected to b, ar a reasonable portion of the increased governmental costs attributable to it. The final de- tern•,ning fartrr et• " t.; , u,e general welfare of the Village ac a �11101e, a ^ not the question of whether -,r no, the proposed subdivision may be expected .o Pay its own way; but the ex- tent to which the subdivision ' may or may not be expected to Pay its own way is one of the "acts which the Council may i .tsider." (b.) Amend the first Paragraph I ` ; f section entitled "Lots" to read / t has follows: i i i "I.uts t L Residential Lots, as t, !-i • I� and area, shall be roverrc,i by and subject to the policy of tl,e' Village Council- Such policy, ' for the promotion o wet see, sanrta ion an t e like, is ut'ec are o j rela .ely large that nroblcros,�nvg}�:;� , drainage and ces you .minirruzed. and so ARE cat ,y, open and ur.orowded aspect of the Village may Ire maintained. X4g1.11.:r_tl,e policy shall bg that all lots conf,=_ t.Tet to the et nxisloL� _in_the 1 enera area s ,vrston. yceptl In r e oea se of very -*.mail subdivisions in- volving less than ten lots in an j area whicc rYi:';ng le, ._rs are clearly less than 23,000 square l i feet, no lots shall be less than twenty-five thousand (23,000) square feet ,n area, nor narrow-, j — than one hundred twenty' 20) feet at the building line,, i Cxclusjvc :4 any easement for, driveway p s+ r p o a e a (utilities easement exrepted)." (c ) Strike the lust three para- graphs of section entitled "Public Open Spaces" and substitute the• following. icy of the V,llarc. Council that ) in all new subdivisions appro- priate . uuli.: apes, spaces shall) be dedicated for public use, 1 ch spaces lwing is addition to e pr'jperty acdrrated for streets, .41leys or p-ib/ic ways. The tx,.icy is that rt least one such •!Iblic open space shall be provided for approximately each ten lots in the subdivision. The area of su,h public ..pen space or spaces shall depend upon the average lot size in the subdivision, the following tabl• to serve as a guide: Percent of Subdivisionl Average to bra in Lot Size Public Open Spa,.e I 25,000 sq. ft. to % acre i0% 11 ,4 acre 'o 1 acre 7% 1 acre to 0A acres S°' over 4 acres area thus dedicai J should be either usable area cr area which can be put into usable shape by the subdivider. The subdivider shall leave land so dedicated :n a condiucn sat- isfactory to the Village Council. "4t the discretion of the V.1- la Council if the circum- a...nces justify such action, the rec,-:irement for public open spaces may be waived or modi- fied upon payment by the sub- 0—ider to the Village of an r, a sum of money to be ".Cc Village for the cre- a!'- i aainten.^nce of other! suitable public park area with- in the Village." (d.) Amend the first sentence of paragraph entitled "Interi-ir Streets" to read as follows: ! "Interior Streets The subdivider steal Fad- anr' I-avel streets, and shall :f rcgL'Ired by the Village Council„ blacktop the streets, all at his own expense." Secticn 2. This ordirarce s1.a11I be published in Lie Minnetonka Herald, published at Wayzata, I Minnesota, and 0-11 be effective imme"tely upoL Lch pubLca- tion. Passed by Village Council o1 the V," qe o. Orono this loth day of February, 1958. by a vote; of 4 yeas and ro nays. Herbert R. Ross, Mayor. Attest: O. E Johr,. -n, clerk (2/13, '5a 4 IV No SEC. 7 (��kjy woo I 'Ito us', • • •• M to RO No /9 S••Oot + r � GnM11oS1 t M • :t} tl-� fro t Lrc • L�� - 1- T • � MAPLEGATE O INLET it It �:1 t ! �i•` • �• y • r� ''nn QA tti Y f' lei •'• ,'` Pam' h t s`-�'� •O � ,. _ . . . - � ( - - - � � - +' - ���� - - - �, I�►ti� ate O ' ;•• ti �rZw/i'. ,. l•1meµ. _ �\ �oTS MAI GATE V u PE ty � f,I• � t ,• ,Ii l ,. r ' tm Imo; v I oil, ,s• _ f 't.\ "i e' `'w1-43 70 ��'.` • .a•. . _u4- allj C t o N K ....b '_• M..,,� »� ESIP, ,23 S Jam/ f �� � `• � � �� ` r (tip i t N 9 --s ,p To: Orono Planning Commission Members From: Duane N. Nall, 1860 Shadywood Road Data: March 12, 1986 Subject: i 1010 Sub -Division and Variance Zoning District: LR-IC - 1/2 acre area, 100' minimum lot width Application: Area, Lot Width and Setback Variance SITUATION: I'm an 18 year resident of Orono. As my household and life style needs changed over the years I moved to accomodate new needs, owning three homes in Orono during the period. In the past year another change has resulted in a new set of living needs. This time I do rot wish to move. I like it at the present address. I own extra land at this address and it seems reasonable to sell the existing house which is a too large f,r me), and put the proceeds into building a new house designed to meet -w needs including certain amenities not possible in the old house. I own lots 27 and 28 of the. Shadywood Plat. The two lots combined are 136' by 289' - .90 acres. The existing house is at the far north of the northern lot. The proposed southern lot is vacant except for a poorly placed garage. I'm proposing a sub --division by lot line rearrangement to meet ■.y new living needs. VARIANCES REQUESTED: Lot Area - Required 80% of Area Proposed Variance Lot Width Required 80% Width Proposed Variance Lot A 21780 of 17424 of' 20850 sf 930 of 4% 100, 80' 70. ,5 ' 29.5' - 29.5% Lot B 21780 of 17424 of 18450 of 3330 sf - 15% 100, B0' 65.5' 34.5' -- ,4.5% Setbacks Required 10/10 10/10 HO% 8/ 8 8/ 8 i.xist ing 7/10 Proposed - 15,/10 Variance a' 301% none Hardcover Required 25% Max 25% Max Variance none none THIS IS A UNIQUE SITUATION - STRICT RNFORCOUNT OF THE ZONING CODF WOULD CAUSE UNDUE HARDSHIP UNIQUE TO TH I S PHOPKRTY THE FIND RK S I A 1 OF THIS SUB -DIVISION AM VARIANCE IS WITHIN THE INTKNT OF THIS COMPKBHKNS I V6 PLAN AUC?P'fKD AND MADF: 1.AW BY ORD I NANCt~ S 172. 1 `I7., . EXHIBITS: 1. West Shore of Crystal Bay 2. 16 New Properties Precedent 3. Variances by Lot Merit 4. Property Owner Rights Granting this applicant's request for lot line rearrangement and variance is reasonable and: THE APPLICANT'S PROPOSED W TS ARE CONSISTENT WITH TIC' AREA DEVELOPMENT AND APPROXIMATE THE MAJORITY OF THE LOTS IN THE AREA The two proposed lots are consistent with 7 out of 10 developed lots in the area, they are admitedly 5 to 10 feet wider and larger in area than most of the lots but consistent never--the--less. I direct Your attention at this point to exhibit gl which shows that r:it lots in the area of the applicant's property are equal to or so ler than the applicant's proposed lots in both lot area and lot width. SUBDIVIDING PAIRED LOTS WILL NOT CREATE A BUILDING BOOM zoning concern that has been considered in the past is the :ottention that granting variances and sub -divisions to adjacent lots under common ownership will result in one -for -one increases in new homes in the area. The data in exhibit *2 clearly shows this is not the case because at least three --quarters of the paired lots in the area have exr�^sive homes centered on the pair of lots, crossing the shared lot I , leaving no room for building additional homes. COMMON SENSE AND REASONING PRE'.,kltS IN ORONO PLANNING RECOMMENDATIONS AND COUNCIL APPLICATIONS OF THE CGMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE This applicant respectfully requests the Commission study exhibit * 3 attached, review the cr:..aris detailed there, and send forth reasoned, relevant findings (see those listed) and a reccmlendation that the sub -division and variance be granted. A DENIAL OF MY REQUEST IS ARBITRARY AND INROVITABLF TREATMENT PRODUCING AND UNNBCRSSARY HARDSHIP Exhibit 1 4 Jetails why I believe this to be true. More important, my knowledge and sense of right and wrong tells we that I have a right to build a new home on the extra land I own as long as my actions are consistent with '.he development of the area I live in and I conform to and approxicstp whet others are doing in the area where I live. THANK YOU FOR CONSIDERING THIS REQUEST EXHIBIT * 1 THE WEST SHORE OF CRYSTAL BAY IS 50' AND 60' LOTS WITH A FEW COMBINED My property at 1860 Shadywood is near the center of the west shore. The near half -mile north and half -mile south of my property holds 41 lots and over 60% are 60' lots or less. An additional half -pile either way along Shadywood (south) and North Shore Drive adds another .59 .ots and of the 91 total lots, 66% are 60' or less. In this area, 44 of the 91 lots are 50' or less in width. The modal density is 3.0 single family units per acre. In some ways, it is a high density area, a.3 with the Seifert property with 6.0 single family units per acre (whicl: happens to be next to ■y property on the north). Only 19 of the 91 properties, 21%, conform to the current zoning standard of 100' lot widths. That is, 79% are slab -standard. Only 11 of the 91 lots, 12%, are 1/2 acre or larger. Clearly, the character of this area is narrow lots of less than one- half acre in size; 50'and 60' lot widths and 100' to 150' lot depths ranging From .15 to .20 acres are very common. The zoning standards of 100' wide and 1/2 acre lots are simply unrealistic in the area where I live. EXHIBIT g 2 SIXTEEN NEW PROPERTIES ON CRYSTAL BAY - A NEGATIVE PRECEDENT??? J. Mabusth, in a memo to the Council on October 25, 1984, reviewed the properties along Crystal Bay and came to the incredible finding that there were 16 commonly owned pairs of lots that could seek division, resulting in 16 new residences on Crystal Bay, if the owner of a similar pair of lots at 1620 Shadywood were granted the variance needed to build on one of the lots. I walked a mile north of my house at 1860 Shadywocd and found eight pairs of commonly owned lots (using the plat saps with outlined pairs of lots provided by the city); in less distance to the south I found another eight pairs of lots. The pairs of lots ranged from 80't3 150' wide. Most were 100' or 120' since the original platting along .itch of Crystal Bay was in 50' and 60' lots. Of sixteen commonly owned properties, one already had two houses, one on each lot; three pairs of lots involved one vacant lot next to a lot which held a house. The three vacant lots were clearly buildable. In TWELVE CASES the existing houses WERE CENTERED on the two lots in such a way so as to cross the shared lot line leaving no room to add an additional structure. For the Mabusth "negative precedent" to occur, 13 of 16 property owners would have to destroy 13 existing homes worth an average of $100,000 each to acquire 13 new lots with less value than the homes that were destroyed to produce the new lots. This sswply does not sake sense. But it did influence the Council which in later findings noted that the LR-IC patterns of development in the Navarre area offered the potential for 43 new properties if the application in question were approved. This is of course absurd. The facts are that if all of these property owners were encoura;ed by the city to tear down their existing homes so that they could acquire a new lot to build on ... most would refuse resulting in less than a half dozen new homes. And where is the evidence that the Crystal Bay / Navarre areas cannot accomodate a half dozen new hos"9 EXHIBIT g 3 VARIANCES VIA INDIVIDUAL LOT MERIT - LOTS IN SEWERED AREAS There exists numerous zoning file cases that evidence the Council's meticulous and judicious application of the zoning standards but one stands out as being recent and similar to the current application. By resolution * 1719 granting the following variances to municipal zoning code section 10.25, subdivision 6 (B) the council appeared to establish the reasonable procedure of approving lots on individual merit. It approved lots that (1) were at least 55' in width and (2) were 77% of the required square footage, and (3) were in sewered LR-IC single family lakeshore residential zoning districts. The Council noted uniquely important detail such as the property is consistent in area with other developed lots and approximates the narrowest -lots �in-the neighborhood. In summary, the Council acted on the following Planning Commission findings: a) No available land on either side of property. b) The property is sewered and watered. c) Additional variances would not, be needed. d) No negative effects on public health, safety, and welfare. e) The variance is consistent with the area's development. f) No future need for hardcover and setback variances. g) The conditions of the land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. h) The conditions do not apply generally to other land in district. i) Granting of the application is necessary for the preservation aid enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. j) Granting the variances will iAnt in anyway impair the health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any .ether respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. k) Granting of the proposed variances will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. The City Council is to be commended for acting in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Without including unnecessary detail at this point, suffice it to say the Council's Conclusions, Orders and Conditions were appro priately comprehensive and considered. EXHIBIT * 4 A DENIAL. OF THIS REQUEST VIOLATES MY CIVIL. AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS In the past few years numerous property owners have received permits to expand existing homes and build new homes on sub -standard lots in the area in which I live, Next. door t<, me there are three single family residenses on a 75' lot -- the owner was given a permit to add more living space and hardcover. Down the street a few houses, a new house just went. up on a 60' lot and next door to that a sidelot setback of 3.1' was OK. There are literally dozens of these situations recorded in Orono since the new zoning codes went into effect in 1975. Why? Because the City Council, in a defensive move to counter an IDS initiative to build high density housing in the Navarre area adopted overly stringent zoning laws in the area. Here are some of the results since that 1975 action: VARIANCES GRANTED 1N ... Width: Area: Setback: Resolution * 1246 40% 10% - Resolution g 1246 40% 7% 15%/40% Resolution s 1719 45% 23% Resolution s 1670 29% 40% Resolution * 171H 39% 31% - Staff, in considerint, an application in the Shadywood Plat., ststed: "staff would suggest that minim = realistic laxeshore lot sizes is LR-IC range from 55% to 75% of 1/2 acre" or .:17 to .37 acres. In summary, almost all the remodeling and building permits issued in the area I live in were granted using a variety of variances, variances in lot wid 11, areas, setbacks, hardcover, etc. To deny me the same consideration and freedoms is arbitrary, capricir)us and wrongful, a deliberate abuse of discretionary power, resulting in an unne-essary hardship and inequitable treatment. / y- TO: Mayor Butler Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE: April 10, 1.9 8 6 SUBJ: #1013 Furniture Minnesota, 3850 Shoreline Drive - Commercial Site Plan Zoning District - B-5 Area - 40,808.81 s.f. or .93 acres 20,000 s.f. required Application •- Commercial site plan review for proposed 80' x 84' structure (6720 s.f.) to house furniture sales/storag` operation. List of Exhibits - A - Application B - Plat Map C - City Engineer Cook's Letter D - Minnehaha Creek Watershed '`istrict Report E - Planning Commiss+.on Minutes ::/17/86 F - Drainage Study r Landscape Plan j. Site Plan I - Watershed - local J - Buildi;ag Plans 6 elevations Steve Katainen, owner of Furniture Minnesota, has purchased the site to construct a "gallery" furniture store - "gallery" operation has been defined by Katainen as a satellite store handlinq limited lines of. furniture. The furniture store would be operated as Katainen's larger store in St. Paul but on a much smaller scale. The store would carry limited brands or special lines in limited quantities. Katainen will make such determinations as soon as the needs and tastes of the local community are determined. Furniture sales uae iE not specifically addressed under B-5 zoning. Staff asked the Planning Commission to determine the compatibility of the proposed use in relation to toe intent of the B-5 zoning district and pattern of surrounding existing commercial development. The intent of the district is to orrivide a district for businesses that supply commodities or perform a service primarily for residents and will not generate high traffic and exc-ess:ve amounts c!' hardcover. Planning Commission found the proposed use compatible not requiring a special zoning amendment. The use would 1,e a low traff is generator and as for hardcover the B-5 district has no hardcover controls. The proposed use will generate less hardcover than the mixed use facility approved for Lowell Zitzlotf in 1979 on the same site. Review the site plan - exhibit H - there is adequate green area around they building, structure and retention pond. Zoning File #1010 April 10, 1986 Page 2 of 3 Site Plan Review - a) Setbacks Required Proposed Front 35' 35' Side 15' 15' Rear, 35' 80' The paved area setback from the newly defined retention area (932 elevation) is approximately 22 Note this is not a designated wetland and the 26 feet setback stan-lard does not apply. Silt fencing and hay bales will be placed ;.long the edge of the retention area/ drainageway prior to construction or gradincj. b) Parking (Section 10.61 Subdivis:)n 10(Q)) Sales area 80' x 63' r 5040 s.t. 1 space per 5040 - 500 = 4540 -- 500 = 9 spaces 9 spaces provided c) Henrepin County Highway D._.pt. Access has been approved - County has asked that access location be lined up with Dunwoody access at Shoreline Dr. In addition, the County asked that Katainen provide a turnaround for trucks on site - this has also been provided. d) Drainage The irai.nage plans have been approved by Glern Cook and the M.C.W.D.. In the conservation district letter ((_xhibit D) thev direct the applicant to seek written permission to construct a baffle weir on the County property. I have b?en advised by applicant's engir►eer that the County has refuf.ed try request finding similarly constructed weirs to freeze creating more se- vere problems. Katainen's plans p,ovide for a retention area that will compensate for the additional runoff cleated by the proposed hardcover and any fill placed below the 934 elevation. *Total ponding area - 25,600 square feet Proposed ponding area on site = 5,700 square feet *Area includes portions of garage and County properties to west in Orono and small residential neighborhood in Spring Park. Spring Park has been advised of the project and their staff has reviewed the drainage plans. They have ne concern as long as additional surface runoff created by the improvement is provided for on site. Zoning File #1013 April 10, 1986 Page 3 of 3 e) Landscaping Plans Staff has reviewed the landscaping plans for the project. Plantings appear adequate - staff would suggest additional plant- ings along east side of building providing screening from adja- cent residential used yard. f) Building Plans - Exhibit. J The pre' iminary work plans h, ve been submitted. Plans did not specify the exterior material to be used. Katainen confirmed the exterior will be finished with brick and wood siding. The structure must be sprinkled. h) Signage Applicant has designated the location of 1 free standing sign to the east -f the access. Per Section 10.61 Subd 3 signage for site will be limited to 175 square feet of area and no sign can exceed 50 square feet. Sign must be located 1-0 feet from designated right-of-way of Country Road 15. Planninq Commission Recommendation - To approve the commercial site plan application of Furniture Minnesota for a furniture store use finding the proposed use compatible with the intent of the B-5 zoning district and surrounding commercial development. Approval is based on the following conditions: l) Applicant to provide quit claim deed to Hennepin County Highwa, Department for that portion of property located within defined r`f,,ht- of-way of County Rcad 15. 2) Amend landscape plan to provide screening along east side of property line. 3) Prior to insurance of building permit, applicant must complete the followinq: a) Developer's agreement to assure completion of grading, paving, ground cover and plantings. Applicant to secure agree- ment with letter of credit or bend acceptable to the city - 150% of cost of improvements. b) Executed flowing & conservation easement over retention pond area. c) Payment. for any engineering fees not covered by original fee payment. 4) Applicant must pay followinq fees with building permit 2 SAC units r $475.00 each for a total of $950.00 2 Sewer units - $804.00 ($335 + $67 x ; - BV4.00 CITY OF ORONO GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION ------------------------------------------------------------------ PROPERTY LOCATION Site Addresss��,�j' Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. ----------------------------------------------------------•-------------- APPLICANT Name KA-i-A !l-> i S'�Z= Pt-4 ENJ 6 4 —O� "7C'7G` Phone - -yFic'r �' Mailinq Address '�S7 --------------------- ------------ 1 !/ 4,L)L fllI&J. Z------------------------ L ONNBRName KAi lA , f`.a r.J �� T'E �`�� ry Phone ---------------- 4+ ! + .a-1. 7 0 ci Mailing Address UC Date Property Acquired T� _ J-T-t4 ! ` 1 _ (month/year) I (do)(�d—o not) also own the adjacent parcels of lance. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS $100.00 a) Residential. accessory Use $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 f) La—d Alteration Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of Lakeshore , PRD/PID - see fee sche 07MM APPLICATIONS 1013 ___ ✓ $150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation S.150.00 Easement. Vacation _— $ c,0.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision Y�s�� (!mot f I t � ► i 1 �� ► , '„ ! �� � • -- — _. 07) A S'�oi did y,l W be 14: fi.' l r w »% 9�RL'NGt 1 +o� O T I ! . VII 1 � . _ .. •� ..ram t" Rd --- i �; ,1,. %we "Iimirefmien' • Sub al EGA 7 : a t, l� Ices Swufp d Lsn4Q v*l • 00arw**41 /� naf, saw t�, Mw,r.�eo�io E p &I ! �sss 4v. `1....a .Y"A" 36 n..�. ,a.......& 35113 PA.— 61.2 636.4600 Marsh 7, 1986 City of Orono Brx 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Ms. Jeanne Mabust Re: File No. 131-1 13 Plat File Stephen Katainen Jear Jeanne, nnu f. &Rruau•. Pf. N.Arn M ROVRI, I' t R•.dlo•d A /'mb"r. P f R,, ho'd t 1—" P £ ].' ., r rM... P/ Gar.. R OVA, P I Anrh 1—d—, P t ,A—eq E 'vopl. P E R•4rd N te.rn PE Rotr •r f. Sr6... 4'. P £ Mrr. r f S —We. P E t)~.. 1-r04,. P f Jr" 1. ♦ M~40-. P t Mrri He-- P t low4 / w/d. P t Mr. Mrl t Rwr.w.^ 101 •RoArr+ R Mt/ ' I F t Rr.:ri A E•r kt I ea M N.rtd . I,-&. M 34s. We have reviewed the drainage and grading plan for Stephen Katainen on County Road 15. We would recommend approval of the plan subject to the following: 1. Elevation of culvert &cruse County driveway be provided 2. Fill placed below 934 contour to be compensated for on the site by excavation in another area. If you have any questions. please contact this offi::e. Yours very truly, BON'BSSTROO, ROSERE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook G1kC:Ii 3817d K 2 w J L-CIi : :� MINNEHAHA CREEF, rrry CC Ap( rIMMETOMR� WATERSHED DISTRICT P O. Box 38i, Wayzata, Minnesota 5539: SOARO Of MAMA M avrd H Cochran. Pre, • Al"rl L Leh na • John f lhornas Cam,'+e U Andre . ,lames B McWethy . James R 5pensley . Richard H MdiI Per+ni t, Application No: 86 - 26 Date: March 1986 Owner ; Stephen Katai nii?,, 871 Payne Avenge St. Paul, MN 51,'101 Location: City of Orono, Sec. 17CCC, Otero Avenue and CSAH 15 Purpose: Stormwater management plan for a furniture store flear Mr. Katainen: At the regularly scheduled March 13, 1986 meeting of the Board of Managers, the subject permit application was reviewed. Action was taken allowing Gistrict staff to issue your permit only after receipt and staff approval of the following: 1. A written statement from the County agreeing to having the baffled weir constructed on their property and accepting maintenance responsiblity. ✓ ?. Information regarding the available storage in the wet'and. 3. A positive review and approval by the City of Orono. 4. A revised plan showing additional compensatory vol- -r >eztween elevations 932 and 934 to offset any bounce on the adjacent wet.,attd from the development. 5, Notice to District staff concerning a construction schedule so that a site inspection can be performed. Please be aavised that the project is not authorized until the above has been submitted and you have been notified of permit is uance. Should you have any questions regarding this matter please contact r- at 473-4224. Very truly yours, FUUNF A. HI rKOK ANP ASSOCIATE'S Fn ineers fcr the 0istrict ^�ZMahady, Fn "P.epr kh cc: Board -J. Mabusth, City of Orono C. Hughes, Coffin A Gronherg, tnc. J. Ault, Hennepin County / MINUTFS OF THY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HEi.I) MAI?('11 11, 1986 #1011 EXCELSIOR BAY YACHT CLUB continued Callahan stated that he felt this was not a reasonabv o use in that the traffic would be extreme and they have no power to police the island. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that the septic site plan was realistic. Taylor stated that he felt that there were too many operation and logistical considerations to be answered before making a decision other than denial. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. The following are the issues that the Planning Commission felt needed to be resolved: 1) Input from Water Patrol regarding location and number of docks, impact of holiday weekends, and policing concerr.s. 2) Applicant to submit a commercial site plan including site plan for docks, and a specific plan for policing including after hours protection a fire protection. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to table this matter until the above issues are can be resolved. Motion, Ayes 6, Nay 0. #1012 WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB 200 WAYZATA BLVD. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING It moved by Rovegno, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to table this matter upon staff recommendation pending additional information. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. EVE KATAIMM ORELINE DRIVE COW"CIAL SITE PLA• REVIEW Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the proposal for an 80' x 85' (6800 s.f.) structure for the use of furniture sales/new furniture storage. She noted that there are no problems with the setbacks, but advised Planning Commission of the drainage/retention problems within the watershed. New development must not create drainage problems for Spring Park residents to west.. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 11EI.D MARCH 17, 1966 #1013 STEVE KATAINEN continued Steve Katainen, applicant and owner of Furniture Minnesota, was present for this matter. fie stated that he would have no problem with altering his plan to meet the drainage concerns of the local watershed and any other conditions required by the City. He explained that he proposes a small neighborhood furniture store. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Kelley, tc recommend approval of the Commercial Site Plan subject to all requirements being met. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. ZONING A!®DM MT SECTION 10.41, B-2 LAKESHORE BUSINESS DISTRICT CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC SIRING The affidavit of publication was noted. In addition, it was noted that all 7 Marinas in Orono were sent a copy of the proposed amendment. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the proposed amendments to Municipal Code Section 10.41 inn ded to provide for regulation of commercial opt tions in the B-2 Zoning District via a conditional use permit and variance procedures, so that the commercial marina licensing provision of Section 5.42 can eventually be eliminated. Attorney Bruce Douglas was present for this matter r6presenting worth Shore Drive Marina and Chaska Marina. Larry Rork, owner of North Shore Drive Marina, was also present. Due to the importance of the proposed amendment in relation to the marinas, and that some of the marina owners may still be on winter vacation and did not receive the notice regarding thin public hearing, _t was suggested that a special meeting be scheduled at a later date to reviiw this matter. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Kelley, to schedule a Public Hearing on Thursday, April 17, 1986 at 7:00 PM in the Orono Council Chambers for tiie proposed B-2 Zoning Amendment, Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. (NOTE: Rovegno left the meeting during this matter at 9:39 changing the vote ratio) In addition to re -scheduling the public hearinq, staff was directed to provide all the marinas with the necessary packet for their review and notify them of the Pt.ibli_• Hearing no later than April 1, 1986. (Confirmation of receipt of th`s information by mari;ias to be made) �1ai!"�CtC,�. .:��,rl•� 'tb�-���.p�Zc'_r� rCa'1CllCl�t1 �,. i tr• •1, l,<•Xl.-'.t��, � \�il�i�`�l `T�.�rt- 0•� Ck, Tv"" 1 CSC. l (0.83 cY_ceS c\ (171ZO.o ET o {�►clerlal�C 3Zo ���. Ft. X I,0 - 3Zo.c) 6 A 6�8 S%. Ft x O • `( = 1ag367. d �Z9-1� 4 b7 5� F't'• x O � � 1 = 2111945 7. � rr , 3. Inn C1 C w• 0 ��0,ct1 Vo'�ume C.! , tQ 0 L S.99 x 0.1 z t.,�� 4�7 ;�. fit• 1 Z'' IoZ j 3778 r , ''C►y,.�yrU C vc+,e cv\;oT) = S.`�� X o.1\ X .-211�4i.i 5�•Ft' I _ 1� 13� SA C, VN t , co -� 3,x ice c aceta c>i= �� ►d Cm,(C� ko,r)8, j . -Z S� 4 ^-� 4b 55 \, n • w ,A 11 S7r o�7niy!'✓� Corc7i �'��` cl 1 p,Olo t� 0.7 5 600 va- FA t. <' \ .N% r hwetly certify that o Of under My '*MKI wperrviewn a duly Rests j d the CAW& 99 W 1+►yat tthebMrs I a��Ilj A- t_^ GRADING 3 DRAINAGE PLAN FOR STEPHEN KATAINEN IN SECTION 17-117-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA P.tplpfEJ � Bui�oivG •� / 0 IY _ Tv n • oroona ' OU.YTY ROAD /7J, p7 Date 2-7-86, 2-28-86 proposed contours shown Sc a 1 e : 1 ' = 30' Keev,ced 3-G-" ffi rw e { M�den drwer+ay o Iron marker Revised 3-0-r. to add turn-acazind,cm- — Existing elevation CScie -S6, °''K4^d chaa%e ^i.ws —_1 Proposed elevation Drainage Datum: Mean Sea Level COFFIN 6 GRONBERG, INC. Engineers & Land Surveyors Long Lake, Minnesota �6- 32 )INT WA -3 ,T M PRING �►,�R�, a CRY AVE r l.RFiIYETLINIE m BLACK -_SPRING PARK BAY LAKE _= M = 7".3 CARMAN BAY 17c .s J•-1 LAFA �� ��'`o_ '% i ING APR 1419^G TO: Mayor Butler & Orono Councilmembers lam$ Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Adninistrator OATS: April 7, 1986 BUWS 1986 Joint Use Dock License, Sandy Beaci. Place The applicant, Richard Zuckman, was requested by staff to submit a letter of no objection from the affected neighbor, Howard Johnson, because Zuckman is relocating his slip no. 7 from the northerly side of the dock to the southerly side (see attached map). Johnson has signed such a letter, and coupled with a record of no complaints on file for this joint use dock, staff recommends approval of a 1986 Joint Use Dock License for Sandy Beach Place per the attached resolution. List of Exhibits: A - 1986 Joint Use Dock License Application B - Howard Johnson letter C - 1986 Joint Use Dock License Resolution CITY OF ORONO 1,1CGNUI: YEAR19 P.O. Box 66 CPYSTAL DAY, MN 55323 473-7357 'I (association) C11- - ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE APPLICATION Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.42 Date Form Sent by City Staff L 3 0 Date Application Returned to City Fee Recived $ 7 r" By Employee`v Section 5.42 Subdivision 2. LICENSE_ REQUIRED - It is unlawful for any (group or association of persons or families, more than two in number, whether incorporated or not) to engage or participate in ... joint use (of any lakeshore property) without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY FEBRUARY 1 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. ASSOCIATION INFORWTTIGN 1. Association title or name (if amyl 2. I-ike M%nV% ipftKA-_ __ Bay Ulwti ILL.___.._ _ _._.. _ ........ ?. Person responsii-1e for this apr:lication. Name �IIsnldnbrjllJCxsiZ Mailing Address_—-u _ dc. sm -_ M013 1Y1�._S.�_ -- --- Relationship to as ociation_—Q-L-4!1 Page l of 5 4 . A.. oe n l �r. . (c _ �s • c ;• .;,,.^1v •ir •t1 icrzblc itcrrr ,. Irer%tal Qcopef-Ny -tvoja}t o,nner un: ^co_•1 c,rctcd ho:, eoviic i•' c grou;1. iricor;-orvted Hor.,•c.wier's Associetion. unincorporated club or recreation group. incorporated club or recreation gmcuu. 5. Frincii,al purpose of joint use dock is (check e rlicable _teax): provide boat mooring and lake access for residential i.roperty. provide swimming cccess, beach, or offsr;cre dock. provide a club or association get►.erint; iilnce for activities. 6. Dock is located on (check applicatle item): X one arawie� privnte nroperty. easement or outlot o�.mrd in coffin. rro�?arty .eeEed Ly the gro1;-/Es£ocietlon. rroperty owned by ti-le group/Association. 7. List Dock location and cunersnip irfcr^•.ation: 8tree` cddres, -� C� �•_ �__._�_ __ le�ai r :�perty desCx. , . i rn _ Ga 1.n}2, r i,� 111, Qar,ot N.W. rovntro�7 i al. � vim a. c o i W l �'f Is - 5. ► `11b.9 J w o., n FZD listed pro: ert;; owner(s) c�asa Z.+cSGr.ns-� 8. Names of abutting lakeshore property owners: (North/West) 1R.J_ r'sc._'i4oS- No�S�►.ereU* 1rio�r.s�+^n�_�SV.�_ (Name + Address) _South/East) 1�•,►,�,..,CQ^tQry+___� .._._._ (Name + Address) NJ Names of other affected property owners: Name 4 Address Iattech s-ieet ceis ry! mF� 2 of , nPt.nl'ete n'A 0' ic;; . ii! t!tc followi'�� informhtiori: riau:e of insured acme of irisurar ce carrier name cf insurnnce aj;erx policy no. Q_1JL effective dote of coverageJ:iCQ aunt of coverstLe; Public lieLility, per person, per ocrur•nce Public ':ability, per occurenc.e 10�boo 10. Seciu-i'..y and rolicine of the Jointly user dz­�k e.rd property is ).,rovided by (check er:p)iceble items): _..__ Pe acing. securit ) ighting. property cwcber's prersence. contra^t security eer 'ce. other {$peciPyl IrCK IPII'OFW,TTON 11. List Dock Uee Area Specific !uns: W-3th of shoreline; I _ ft. I&%gtt, of me.{rr dock frrri chore; 5_ ft. Dock settacks frog, side *_,mpe:-ty lines at shore; L_ ft. and 35ft. 12. DDck Construction (check al piiceble items): _L_ seasonal deck (relocpted r r rep)a :^! i each year) . — renranent pili.nf; wlt�i seasonal deck. permanent piling and decking. __._. w«oden decking. _.._ metal decking. 13. Lint Dock A.ccesrories: Number of fire extinguishers evailer_.e at the do,�K 1 Number of life preservers available at thu dock Q 14• List number of slips in tech category ("flips" inc ules boot sifts): Transient (day use on)y) slits . Transient (de; use) off-sho. joys Permanent naoraye slips , ?ersene-+t wx raeo oft-sh-re buoys C,_. Dry storage ( rack) s11j,s D.Wiximire nusrber of ''boats at the dock _. I$. List number of off-street lsrrcirs Ppacas avallable for users of the joint u e bock. IvAing, 4f ) rr`vided must not l.P se,Mreted fmir the dock by wny public rood. s;eces . 3 � r ►, :I"IK_:'dT. -W.: Ck lfi. A', Ile t(:'i u2 (c%e,_k ae ite,..): _ ctonu r I w re1). fraud rcawal. . %e02 ::eavnll. concrete ret>well. gross and vegetation only. other (spec f-I 17. Lk•r;th of water at shoreline is ft; at 50 1'46 • uut is a 100 fL. out :s 12, F:LQUIREU ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: A. DOCK PLAN - ALI, APPLICATIONS A dock plan, drawn to scale, showing the shoreli,,e width of this property, the side property lines and the cation, layout and dimensions of all docks, slits and buoys. If off-street pd).incj, dry storage )r other on -land functions are intended, these also should be Lhown on the plan. B. UNINCORPORATED GFOUPS OR ASSOCIATIONS 1. A list of the names and mailing addresses of al'_ members and/or slip users. 2. A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use. Note: This copy is not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same by-laws or agreement originally made in i iq 83 (state year) and on file with the City." `9) Applicant's initials C. INCORPORATED CLUES OF ASS 'IATTONS 1. A list of the name:;, mailing addresses and titles of all corporat off„officers. 2. A tatement as to the total number of members in the club .ssociation. membc r s . 3. A certified c..opy of the articles of ince a t..on and by -jaws of the corporation. Note: These copies are not re ui _ the applicant initials and certifies the following statement: is a renewal epplicetion and our joint use dock is to be operated u c same articles of incorporation and/or by-laws as originally mad last amended in _(state year) and on file w.'-h t':e City." Applicant's initials Pa-ie 4 of ', D. ANN.UAL LICENSE FFE - ALL APPLICATIONS Joint Use Dock License Application fee according to the current City Fee Schedule. RENEWAL JOINT USE FEE, per year _ 2000. PLUS SLIP FEE for each permanent moorage slip, lift, dry stack, or buoy 3_slips Q $2.00 each $ 1 ©_ i A T J TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $ 3� G i LATE FEE - Renewals Applications for renewal of licens( .11 be made no later than February 1 of the license year. Ti, ty shall not accept renewal license applications received after Febr.i_a__r_y 1 unless the application is accompanied by a late fee of $25.01. REVIEW PROCEDURE When a complete application is i .Lved, the application will be reviewed by the City Council and. the case of new or unusual applications, also by the Planning Commiss an and Marina Committee. The Council -ill pass upon the application after complete review. ` THE SUBJECT DOCK MAY BE INSTALLED AND/OR OPENED FOR USE ONLY UPON J APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Joint Use Dock License Application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the City's employees and agents to enter upon the property at any reasonable time to pe form safety and code compliance inspections. Signed..___ ) of, 1) CAT'Y of OROINo P0Ht Office BOx 66•Crystal Day. Minnesota Sfi,' 230Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka January 3, 1985 Sandy Beach Shores c/o H. Richard Zuckman 1819 DuPont Pvenue South Minneapolis, MN 55403 Res 1986 Joint Use Dock License Application Dear Mr. Zuckman: An application for a 1986 Joint Use Dock License has been enclosed for yoi- to complete and return to t} City Offices with the application fee by February 1, 1986. Applications indicating no change from previous licenses will be scheduled for Council approval in February. If you anticipate changes in your dock use For .1986, please contact me as soon as possible at 47.3-7357. Sincerely, r Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant. Zoning Administrator Enclosure RVII b1NA' A RMIN(: _. 471.707 • At111OOMAIMN a MAWF, - 473-IM • R'at KWUAKS 47) 11$9 A;;;SS1NG I I I I I I � I I I I i I I I I i I 1 I � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � L.� �4p SLIP Nn. ,cc-v/kvb /- 8c r'E7C l Mc D ^k'Y7F/cq-7c ; E : I = 20' i GHtJC* h'iPLlD'� K 362.36 Par ym� Area -cc) rs � A V), April 6 1�)86 Mr. Michael saffron Asst. Zoning Ads. City of Orono Dear Mr, Oaffron The proposed relocation of boat mooring on the south side of the main dock at Sandy Beach will not effect my dock use area and I have no objection to the proposed slip location change. Q,p mv + Sinc ely. 15 VKaverd Johnson 'Z 3-77 -0392 FOR THE City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO ISSUE A JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE TO SANDY BEACH PLACE SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 1986 TO DECE10ER 31, 1986 WHEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafter "City" is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota and has the authority and responsiblity under Minnesota Statutes, State Statute 412, et. seq. and State Statute 462, et. seq., to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City and other members of the public within the City; and WHEREAS, the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over the primary harbor limit of the City of Orono with the Lake Minnetonka Conservation Di -strict and the Department of Natural Resources of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the regulation of the navigable waters involves an exercise of police power of the State, LMCD, and the City of Orono, all of which have adopted rules to ensure to all equal enjoyment of the public rights and equal protection from activity on or near the public waters and on the land within the City which, if unregulated, may be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare; and WHEREAS, the regulations of the DNR, LMCD, and the City of Orono regulate the property rights of the riparian owners both as to residential owners and the commercial marina owners, to the extent prohibiting any interference with the public waters adjoining their property. The LMCD, DNR and City of Orono must fulfill their trustee- ship over the public waters by protecting against interference by anyone, including those wzo assert the commonlaw rights of riparian owners, whether or not they be commercial marinas or residential owners: WHEREAS, as to Lake Minnetonka, a mutual right of enjoyment ex -,.s between and is share! by riparian owners and the public generally, no one riparian owner has exclusive privileges over Lake Minnetonka. The only additional private right that any riparian owner may have over the public generally is to construct one dock to the navigable depth of the public: waters. There can be no dispute but that the public yenera.11y and each riparian owner to Lake Minnetonka has the right to use the entire surface area of bake Minnetonka for all suitable purposes in common with a]1 ot.hrr riparian owners. This right is a right not only to members of the publi,.- but the right to each riparian owner. P,I! of 1 (pity of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. :his mutual right of enjoyment vhich is shared by riparian owners and the public generally includes the recreational benerits of the lake such as boating and fi=thing therein; the riparian owner has no exclusive privileges to these rights; and WHEREAS, Lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial ber, `.icial public use only as long as all riparian users of the lake are regulated in such a way as to ensure there is no abuse of the limited riparian rights; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted reasonable regulations regarding the construction and use of Lakeshore and ciock facilities when such facilities are used and maintained by chr-,, or more families, which regulations include the annual llc-rasing of Joint Use Docks pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Muni _ Code; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to set forth the above ncted general conditions and concerns and the following r�iecial conditions as they relate co an application for an annual Jo-,.t Use Dock License described on Exhibit A attached, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that ;:he City Council of tht City of Orono hereby directs the Staff to issue a Joint Use Dock License according to the facts and conditions noted on Exhibit A attached. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono at their meeting on the 14th day of April, 1986. Mary C. Butler, Mayor. ATTEST: Dorothy M.�Hall.in, City Clerk CITY OF ORONO EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF ISSUANCE FOR ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE I. LICENSEE: Sandy Beach Place Dock Address: 3995 North Shore Drive Agent: H. Richard Zuckman Address: 1819 Dupont Ave. South, Minneapolis, MN 55403 Licensee is: Owner License Period - January 1, 1986 to December 31, 1986 II. BOAT DENSITY The number of in -place boat s lips, 1 if is and buoys sha 1 1 not exceed the number shown on the attached plan, Exhibit B, and in accordance with Resolution 938, in no case shall the number of authorized boat slips, lifts, or buoys c _,eed the number permitted in the prior year's license. Authorized Boat Density per attached plan: Bay West Arm Transient (Day use only) Slips 0 Permanent M_ agP Sips 7 Boat Lifts 0 Sub -Total: Slips at Dock 7 Offshore Buoys U Maximum Boats in Water 7 May4ituiR Boats pej prior license 7 MAXIMUM BOAT DENSITY 7 Exceeding this maximum boat density, or exceeding the number of permitted slips, lifts or buoys is a violation of this license subject to revocation and/or prosecution for violation of Section 5.42 Subdivision 2 of the Orono Municipal Code. Exhibit A Resolution No. _ Page 2 III. DOCK LAYOUT The dock structure or layout authorized by this license shall be as shown on attached Exhibit B. Any changes in this layout shall be subject t(i prior review and approval of the City Council. IV. SPECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinance of the City and/or the LMCD. The issuance of this license iF subject to full compliance with these conditions. Failure to comply with these conditions is cause for li.:ense revocation and/or prosecution by the City. 1. The seven approved slips are for the exclusive use of the residents/renters of Sandy Beach Shores. 2. City will require written approval from abutting and affected property owners for each annual license review. V. Nothing in this license shall confer upon any person for the benefit of any property any vested right to use Lake Minnetonka or the premises :n a manner permitted by this resolution, but the uses of Lake Minnetoafta and the premises shall remain subject to such regulations and ordinances as the City and other competent regulatory authorities shall deem necessary from time to time in the public interest. Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. l,.n.(, N..m....,a PI rnnN (,r.. PI Nobs N Nwrnr. I' I A..sA 1 (,...dun. P I O Iu.rpA ( AwdrrbA, .' L I nu..w. I nux,. P I tl,ddfwd .1 I rm(,.F. P.! N.. hwd W Ia w. P I --" - -- - -_-- —`--- 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 Engineers & Architects Nu Awd! Is."y. Pl. l.nn( CN,uw,P2 Nu6rrs6 UArun As. P.E Mar.ml k.rr.fr.Pl St. Paul, MN 55113 Ik—id ( arrprdl. PE Jrrrl .l IAwrFrw. Pi. 612.636.4600 . 155� AIw* A Iia u -. P L. I.v A IWAi. P E n ~. HAwl r Now.. P.E NM+usN P1rI,r.A Pe. IA. d u L.Awr. P 1. April 9, 1986 11...n., N Prsfryuw. PE. ��'6--.p i• •.'(.. *,�f j] ia / Alu Awl(' L,mA. PL. Vr `.i1is�RL"d A—*L *i*,PE )rnr. a AA.Yn/. P E City of Orono Ar mw ,t P. Aa&W—. P E A,aAA amAnywn. PL Box 66 AlwAa aldfI,PI Crystal Bay, MN 55323 7aA~E.tlAacm.rEA J. wl L Yowp. P I Attn: Mr. Mari. Bernhardson ("'A w. L.o A/ P(r.+WJ,/ Citv dministrato.r Ihr.A, or" UWA U. EM+A4 Re: Our Fil! No. 0612 Orono Interceptor Improvements Dear ?lark, We are currently completing the draft report of the Preliminary Design Report of the Orono Interceptor Improvements for the Metropolitan Waste Control Com- mission. We would like to inform the Mayor and City Council on Monday, April 14 of findings to be presented within the report! the design wastewater floss i.,sed fur analyse id solution alternatives. It is essential _aat a cooperative effort be made between the MWCC and the Citv of Orono so that the Interceptor Improvements may serve both in the best possible manner. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK b ASSOC,'IATES, r%l;. Michael C. Lynch MCL:Ii Fnc 1. 4365d alow 30 Year Anniversary i _ Nil I ' Rl UTARY, SEW SYS EJs ORONO. MINNESOTA SANITARY SEWER N } COLLECTION SYSTEM �; s • ,irr tutu • • •rr[• rtN \ � '�� ORONO .r :•��"• Mtr r r[ t "rt• INT,EFICEPT R � t" Ir • c c _ IMP1AC,EMEN7S Nr1 ��..6(uU wren M•l• ttM•,• r.• •Ip rUJ ... •••t• MY • ,Yt NI(• t•t••1,•• M ft• ywc.0 }JECT 86 - 51 f A FOR s A1IE_ - rx \ 1 I . CRY$ DAY U �RFA i ARF� 2 Npn•tie ua Nos•r.•y AndorHM ! A•oUt TABLE A AREA FLOW SUMMARY PRESENT AVERAGE DAILY WASTEWATER FLOWS (GPD) TOTAL FLOW (gpd) BASE WASTEWATER FLOW_Lgpd) INFILTRATION/INFLOW (gpd) LOCATION AREA FLOW SUMMATION AREA FLOW SUMMATION AREA FLOW SUMMATION Area 1 90,000 90,000 65,000 65,000 25,000 25,000 Area 2 210,000 300,000 132,000 197,000 78,000 103,000 Area 7 26,000 26,000 20,000 217,000 6,000 109,000 Area 4 170,00 496,000 120,000 337,000 50,000 159,000 Area 5 50,000 546,000 35,000 372,000 15,000 174,000 Area 6 101000 556,000 7,000 379,000 3,000 177,000 TOTAL 3652d 556,000 -)" "O00 1/7,000 i. tss4' TABLE B AREA FLOW SUMMARY FJTURE AVERAGE DAILY WASTEWATER FLOWS (GPD) BASE WASTEWATER FLOW gpd) INFILTRATION/INFLOW (gpd,` TOTAL FLOG' 'Ud) LOCATION AREA FLOW SUMMATION AREA FLOW SUMMATION AREA FLOW ',MMATION Area 1 85,000 85,000 29,000 29,000 114,000 114,000 Area 2 195,000 280,000 88,000 117,000 283,000 397,000 Area 3 26,000 306,000 7,000 124,000 33,000 430,000 Area 4 203,000 509,000 66,000 190,000 269,000 699,000 Area 5 74,000 583,000 22,000 212,000 96,000 795,000 Area 6 12,000 595,000 4,00() 216,000 16,000 811,000 TOTAL 595,000 216,000 811,000 3652d 'rAB,..E C FUTURE FLOW SUMMARY FUTURE AVEkAGE DAILY FUTURE PEAK HOURLY FUTURE PEAK INSTANTANEOUS WASTEWATER FLOW_(] pd) WASTEWATER FLOW (gpd) WASTEWATER LOCATION AREA FLOW SUMMATION AREA FLOW SUMMATION AREA FLOW SUMMATION Area 1 114,000 114,000 465,000 465,000 540,000 540,000 Area 2 283,000 397,000 1,155,000 1,620,000 1,339,000 1,879,000 Area 3 33,000 430,000 135,000 1,755,000 157,000 2,036,000 Area 4 269,000 699,000 1,098,000 2,853,000 1,275,000 3,311,000 Area 5 96,000 795,000 391,000 3,244,000 453,000 3,764,000 Area 6 161000 811,000 66,000 3,310,000 76,000 3,840,000 TOTAL 811,000 gpd 3,310,000 gpd 3,840,000 gpd 3652d TABLE D LIFT STATION ANALYSIS EX. CALIBRATED APRIL 1985 SUMMATION SUMMATION L.S. RATED CAPACITY CAPACITY gpmT RAINFALL FUTURE PEAK FUTURE PEAK 1 PUMP ONLY PUMP 1 PUMP 2 BOTH EVENT 11OURLY FLOW INSTANTANEOUS FLOW L-49 300 174 155 298 194 323 375 L-46 380 307 444 551 701 1,125 1,305 L-45 415 365 432 631 750 1,219 1,414 L-44 560 574 615 883 1,125 1,981 2,299 L-43 640 783 776 877 1,236 2,253 2,614 L-59 2,400 1,258 2,299 2,667 1,258 gpm 2,299 gpm 2,667 gpm (1.811 mgd) (3.31 mgd) (3.84 mgd) INTERCEPTOR ANALYSIS APRIL 1985 SUMMATION SUMMATION RAINFALL FUTURE PEAK FUTURE PEAK SEGMENT EX. APACITY (gpm) EvEwr HOURLY FLOW INSTANTANEOUS FLOW L-49 540 - 323 315 L-49-L-46 730 701 1,125 1,305 L-46-L-45 780 750 1,219 1,414 L-45-L-44 1,100 1,125 1,981 2,299 L-44 1,170 1,236 2,253 2,614 L-43-L-59 1,310 1.258 2,299 2,667 1,258 gpm 2,299 Spa 2,667 Spa (1.811 rogd ) ( 3. 31 sgd ) (3,84 o9d' - 4 _ 3652d 13 To: Mary Butler, Mayor .is ;�!' t'li ?' � � ''` �' �ETING Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator. Orono Council Members From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator CITY OF ORONO Date: March 6, 1986 l' Subject: #1008 John Pillsbury, 315 Woodhill Road - Class I Subdivision - Fine Approval - Resolution Zoning District - RR-lB Area - 42.36 Acres Application - Subdivision - Class I - Registered Land Survey [Section 11.03, Def. "Subdivision, Classification" (a)(1)] List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Application Property Owners List Plat Map Planning Commission 2/18/86 -urveys .LS Mr. Pillsbury plans to divide his homestead parcel of 42+ acres into two parcels. The larger parcel will go to the adja- cent landowner to the east, Woodhi 11 County Club, and an eight acre parcel to a private ci*izen. The eight acre parcel will contain the principal residence any: all accessory structures (garage/caretaker's residence or apartment and tennis court). The residence parcel will be served by an existing driveway that intersects the future Woodhill property. Woodhill must grant an access easement in favor of the residence parcel. All structures meet the required setback from the newly proposed lot line. The septic systems for both the main residence and caretaker's residence above the garage are located within the proposed boundary lines. If a future subdivision is proposed for this property, based on the location of the second accessory residential structure., lots can be designed to meet the RR-lP zoning standards. Planning Commission questioned the use of an exsiting driveway access that proceeded west through to the adjacent Carpenter property. The applicant advised that there is no formal easement for the use and noted that it existed as an informal arrangement or courtesy to Pillsbury. Planning Commission Recommendation To recommend approval of the Class I subdivision application of John S. Pillsbury Jr. and variance to pertinent sections of Section 10.02 of the zoning code finding all standards of the subdivisioncode have been satisfied and to approve a conditional use permit for a caretaker residence or second residential unit on tract A finding that all regular lot requirements can be met by the second unit. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Caretaker apartment is for the sole use of the owner of the principal residence and may not be renter' 2. Future owner of the larger parcel mt�at grant an access easement in favor of tract A. The enclosed resolution has been drafted to include the necessary finding and conditions to approve the subdivisia-., application of John S. Pillsbury Jz. e Date R(,c. d 7� ��� By Fee Rec'dA CITY OF ORONO .)AN 2 1 19ffi SUBD.VISION APPLICATION FORM ----------------------------------------.---------------------------------- APPLICANT Name .- '-n S. Pillsbury, Jr. Telephone 338-4382 Mailing Address 1300 TCF Tower, Minneapolis, MN 55402 PROPERTY Name _John S. Pillsbury, Jr. Telephone _338-4382 OWNER Mailing Address Note: Send copies of all correspondence to: (Attach list if more than one) Thomas M. Crosby, Jr., Faegre i Benson, 2300 Multifoods Tower, 33 South 6th St., Minneapolis, MN --------------------------------------------- 13-7i-532-71--------------- 54-ol-- PROPERTY LOCATION Street Address 315 Woodhill Road, Wayzata Property Identificaticn No. (P.I.D.) 02-117-23-13-0001 Complete Legal Description to be attached to application - - ------ EXISTIh LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels 1 # - Development Size Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land 42.3()f i Acres Total, all r-%arcels Pr,.!sent Use (check) X Residential; no. of units 1 Other (specify) Present Zoning District v-------------------------------•------------------------------------------- ro PROPOSAL Division for Zax Purposes N o Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) -.4 .14 w a ` X Subdivision for New Building Sites rnto r--I4J Number of Building Sites: Existing Units 'n w -4 _l _ ^ 1 New Unit.: -4 u 2 Total Units :j a7 R -- A 04 0 r+ +� w r. o P Proposed P Crons Density * Y - Units f'^-r Acres M cr u 4 -- V.nvW 0-4 G ? Minimum Lot Size:* Square Feet Dry Buildable a4 2 o .A - -------- Land -4 u v 'O 'b 41 0 C A a PI opesed Usr : ((heck) Res I dent 1 r11 Other (s p e c I f y --------------------------------- MINIMUM MATER1AL NECISSARY FOU COMPIA;Tr PRELIMINARY APPLICATION ti 1. Application Completed 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of :purvey. 3 ^ertified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be )Ltained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 4. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or ,nylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat. Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) $150.00 X Preliminary Review (Class I 6 II Subdivisions) $250.00 Preliminary Review $300.00 plus (Class III and all non-residential) 20.00/lot Final Plat Review (Class III) $150.00* *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant has read the at ove and hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Panning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature y +�- ��-=- l< �- - ; ? Date t kVA Owner's Signature %r.'...1, "-) pate _ _ j17 Applicant must have all sut,mittal:.,: into the City c)ffi(jcn :S days before the Planning Commission Mertinq. Planninq commission Mf�etirgs arf, u:1u.+11y held on the third Monday of va. h month. PUN DATt 01/09/86 BATCH 002 38 02-117-23 31 0040 Oft PROP ACDR 012D5 DICKENSCH ST OW^:ER NAME QUENTIN LAUER ETAL TAXPAYER DOLCRES A LAUER t1AYE/ADDR 1205 DICKENSON ST ,f„ WAYZATA MH 553'*;1 38 02-117-23 31 0047 PROF ADDR 00450 ORONO CZCi PD RD S CL.?:i r NAME EDWARD H Hk-�l TAXPAYER EnWARD H H4t2t NAME/ADDR 408 ST PETER ST SiPAUL MN 55102 r 38 02-117-23 42 0001 PROP ADCR 00533 RUSSELL AVE O:J'4ER ttAME K 6 P NORMAN 4m TAXPAYER KEHT . NORMAN NAME/ADDR 538 RUSSELI, AVE WAYZATA t'w1 55391 Oft 38 02-117-23 42 0006 PROP ADDR O'.:1ER NAME THE NATUPE CONSERVANCY TAXPAYER THE NATURE CDNtjtRVANCY t+AME/ADDR 328 E HENNEPIN AVE MPLS MN 55414 r 38 02-117-23 43 0015 rKOP ADCR 01205 SHORELINE OR 01WHER NAME DCIIALD P GAYZLE JR TAXPAYEP DONALD P GAMBLE JR NAME/ADOR 1205 SHORELINE DRIVE WAYZATA MN 55391 PROP ADDR 0:'NER NAME TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH 002 00033 NAME/ADDR r HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION S'!STEM PROPERTY 0W`1ERS LIST 38 02-117-^3 31 0041 00559 RU'SELL AVE ERLING HOWARD SCHNEIDER J P E M M MCALPIN 559 PUSSELL AVE ORONO rN 55391 38 02-117-23 31 0048 01225 DICKENSON ST BASIL M YOUNG ET AL BASIL M YOLkIG 1270 DICKENSON ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 02-117-23 42 0003 00450 WOTCHILL RD HELEN F r HELEN Q'1E 450 WOODHiLL RD WAYZATA MN 55391 ;A 02-117-23 42 0006 --HILL CCUNTPY CLUB WnC:IHILL CHTRY CLUB 00 WOOHILL PD WAYZATA MN 55-391 3e, 02-117-23 43 0013 01165 FERtI)ALE RD W G A J RITZ CORDON H 3 JOYCE M P.ITZ 1165 W FERNDALE PO WAYZATA MN 55391 REPORT NO. P2435401 PAGE 4 38 02-117-L3 31 0042 00568 FEENE AVE WALKER MOTORS INC SEARS IMPORTED AUTOS INC 13500 WAYZATA BLVD MIt1NETONKA MSI 55343 3S 02-117-23 41 0009 EUPLINGTON NORTHEPN PY BURLINGTCN NORTHERN RY .tea 38 02-117-23 42 0004 01065 EDGEW000 HILLS RD ANNF L RITZ AN'!E LAPSEN SIMCNSON 1065 EOGEW000 HILLS RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 02-117-23 42 0009 �. r THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ' THE NATURE COt1SERVANCY 328 E HEt01EPIN AVE mil! 5 "1°l 55414 38 02-117-23 43 0025 01185 FERNDALE RD W HENRY S KINGMAN JR ET AL HEN?Y t MARILYN KINGMAN JR 1185 M EFRNDALE RD ! °' WAYZATA MH 55391 RUN DATE 01/09/86 BATCH 032 4ENKPIN COIRTT t PROPERTY INFOPMA, ION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWr,75 LIST REPORT ►r!3_ PI4'".+'I PAGE 5 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEAPS THIS DATE ON THE RECCFDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY.TAXAT � TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AN' BELIEF / DATE / a W, cottag ro 00, 15po Noah VA 10 U- 44 IL low" 41� i17, MINUTi:S OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING III;I.0 FEBRUARY 18, 1986 L) ATTENDANCE 7:30 I'M The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Chairman Kelley, Taylor, Povegno, McDonald, and Goetten. Absent: Sime and C,1-'ahan. The following represented the City staff: Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder Peterson. #1007 ROBERT i CAROL TRAPP 4701 WEST BRANCH ROAD PRELIMINARY SUBDIVSION PUBLIC HEARING 7:30 - 7:42 Robert & Carol Trapp were present for this matter. Zhe purpose cf the public hearing was to consider the request for rt iewal of preliminary plat approval granted previously grated 6/2/80 but was never completed. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request which consisted of a 2 lot plat. He noted that each lot was n excess of t} two acre minimum lot requirement a..3 that there %.as an existing dr.ving serving th,� existing hou.e which would be shared by the .-�w lot. In response to Chairman Kelley's question, Assistant Zoning Adm nistrator Gaffron stated that 3 horses are allowed on 7,.45 acres. '\ssistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron notes: that s variance would be r-quired for the animal barn which is located 130' from existing east prc.perty line whereas 1.50' is normally required and this fact would be incorporated in the resolution if this subdivision were approved so that the future owner of Lot 2 would be aware of the location cf the animal .arn. There were no comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by McDonald, to recommence approval of t:,^ preliminary subdivision subject to staff's recomme.,dat.ions. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. rl-10-2008, H'N S. PILI.SBURY JR. HII,I• ROAC PRRIA MINARY SUBDIVISION-MVrES AND ROUNDS PUBLIC Ift"IW-, 7:45 - 8!03 Present for this matter was Ilenry KLrlgman an,1 Robert Hartfiel, representing John S. Pillsbury Jr.; and John Wi►ston, representing woodhill Country Club. Zo, nind Admini,;trator Mabusth exp]aine6 th(,. subdivision request for a Class I metes and i.•oundc division of 42+ cres into 2 parcels. The ] s-c - parcel will gc to the a .:cent landowner, Woodhi 11-o..,itry Club, and a• eight u e parcel will contain the principal residence ' all arkessory ctructures for private ownership. h noted that all structures meet required lot lineb Regarding the existing guest house, Zoning Administrator M- busth stated that it could meet the required 2 acre e ,elope and be divided off, but would not meet ;:-fie pab14.c road requirement. Taylor questioned the use of a driveway that appeared to be used by the Pillsb..ry's and Carpentzr's. John Winston stated thrt Mr. Carpenter has a 1 lowed Mr. Pillsbury the occasion-:l use of it and it could be closed off but 1 see's no ro-ason to do so. Mike & Darlene Blazek, 1:30 Woodhill Road were present for this matter for informational purposes only. sere were no comments from the public ar:d the public paring was closed. It wan moved by Rovegno, seconded by Goetten, to recor.�.i,and approval of the preliminary metes and bounds division subject to staf f's recommendat ' Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. ZONING AMENDMENT F,SCTION 10.41. ; -2 LAKSSHORE gUS. .,r..L;S DISTRICT PUBLIC HEARINO 8:00 Chairman Kelley announced that this Public Hearing wov be tabled until the March 17th Planning Commission meeting. #1003 HANS G. WEIL-ER i DOH KEMPF 1125 i 1.135 NORTH ARM DRIVE SUROIVISION OF A LOT LINE RRARRANGh dOT CONT? l4`''ATION OF PUBLIC HE&FIING 8 : 04 - 8 t 20 Mr. & Mrs. Hans G. Weiler were F sent for this matter. ,oning Administrator Mah-;sth explained th- request for a lot line rearrangement which was previot ly approved in 1972 in order to build a new house at 1125 North Arm Drive but was never filed. Mabusth noted that P.-i-ce l C, which is actually a part of Lots 22 & 31, will be accui.red by Weiler. Mabu: '-h explained that Lot 6 i.s sad as a riparian lot and staff recommends requiting a! ^pac: -asement over this lot. 2 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. T. RESOLUTION APPROVING A REGISTERED LAND S!, RVEY FOR A CLASS I SUBDIVISION FGF JOHN S. PILLSBURY - FILE #1008 WHEREAS lie City of Orono is a muni.ciapl corporation organized and exi. g under the -aws of the Svate of Minnesota; and WBEREI' S, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopts 1b, -ion regulations for the orderly, economic and sale c IPr " land w'thin the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application fora Clz:ss I Subd.Lvision by John S. Pillsbury, Jr. (hereinafter "the subdivider") of a property legally described as follows: See Exhibit A Attached WHEREAS, the City Council granter variances to Section 10.02 items (39),(43),(67), and (77) that-equire, all lots to abut i existing or dedicated public street based on the following findings: .L. The subject. ..,_ol-)erty cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under the standards required by the above referenced sections o the code. 2. The p'.ight of the landowner is lue to circumstances unique to his property and not cr-ated .)y the landowner. 3. Th 3r.tirg of this varience will not al. ter the essent ..aract.er of the surrounding neighborhood. 4. she grantincl of this variancA is in keeping with the 41. r:.t of the Zoning Code an- Comprc:iensive Guide Plan of the CiLy. 5. The gra. -incl of this variance is consi.stant with the previous action:; of the Council :whenever it approves the creation of lots served by private roads or private casements; and Page 1 of 2 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. WHEREAS, the City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit for the existing caretaker apartment on Tact A finding that all lot standards of. the RR-lB zoning district can be met; and WHEREAS, the subdivicir has completed all requests of the City for a Class I subdivision with a registered land survey. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the the City Council -)f the City of Orono hereby approves the Class I subdivis: application of John S. Pillsbury, Jr. as shown un the Re !istei_ Land Survey by Vernon A. Nichols and attached to this resolution subject to the following conditions: 1. Ca .-taker apartment located within detached garage en Tract A shall be -ised solely by the owr.pr of the principal residence and may not be rented. 2. Subdivider must grant an access easement favor of Tract A. 3. The afc aid division as shown on the attached registered 1Q survey shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Henn, in (r-unty Reg-'strar of Titles on or bef,)r- September. 10, 198E gethcr with a certifie-d original ccpy of this resolution. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the division has not b#.en filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will },e necessary to file a r,,-�w application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota, this loth day of March, 1986. A'.0 rm* : Dorothy M. Eiallin, City Clerk Mary C. Bu`_ (er, Mayor Page 2 of 2 " N REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO., HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA EGAN, FIELD IB NOWAK, INC. SCALE IN FEET SURVEYORS 0 100 200 3m BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED 0 DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS TO: Mayor and City Council , �,NR 14 j j 6 FROM: Mark Lernhardson, City G'- AdministratoCITY l �1 f �' � �. � DATE: March 24, 1986 SUBJ: Lake Minnetonka Use and Access/Task Force Report Attached please find a final draft of t•;etro Council's Task Force report regarding the lake. The report is substantially the same as the draft report you saw at the March 10, 1986 meeting. Additionally attached are the minutes from the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District developing their stance for the Task Force report. Negotiations between DNR and the city of Minnetrista continue, however there has been no result to date. By the time the April 14th meeting Ls held, it is anticipated that the Governors Executive Committee will have met hav�r.g received Metro Councils' Task Force report and may possibly be giving direction to DNR on the issue. As a side note, I did testify at the Public Hearing on the draft document at the March 12, 1986 Public Hearing held in Edina where I outlined thf- issues regF ding comparability with other lakes in the seven county area, the Council's stance regarding funding and the Council's position regarding additional. accesses on the lake. Independently, estimates for the proposed parking on property he City owns to the west of North Arm are in the neighborhood of $75,000 - $100,000 for total devel.,r.tient. Proposed Motion - Moved by —, seconded by the City Council accept the information relating to the Metre Council's Lake Minnetonka Task Force. Ayes , Nays REPORT TO THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL METROPOLITAN COUNCIL'S TASK FORCE ON LAKE MiNNETONKA INTRODUCTION 3.19.86 On Oct. 2, 1985, the city of Minnetrista asked the State Executive Council, composed of the cun.stitutional elected officials of Minnesota, to intervene in a dispute between the city and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) over a proposed free public boat launch site at King's Point on Hzlisted's Bay c,f Lake Minnetonka for which ONR held an option. The Executive Council referred the issue to the Metropolitan Council, as follows: State Auditor Arne Carlson moved, seconded by Attorney Gene -al Hubert Humphrey, III, that: "The matter of (public boat launch) sites on Lake Minnetonka; including the King's Point Road site as well as those future sites that will crAme down the 'tine, be referred to the ►.clirtpolitan Council for purposes of a compre- hensive review and then come Sack to us with an overall recommendation relative to what access on Lakt Minnetonka should be, so that we (the Executive Council) can avoid t.he,,e one by one kinds of quarrels. I think it's a more uniform approach, ; think it's a more regionil approach and hopefully, it's an approach for mun:cipalities around th• lake to be able to have adequate input into the overall system." The motion passed 5-0. COUNCIL RESPONSE In response to the reauest, the Metropolitan Cou.icil established a Task Force on Lake Minnetonka (MCTFLM), chaired by Council member Patrick Scull) and made up of Council members, lake municipality representatives, and representatives of DNR, Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) and Minneh,ha Lreek. Watershed District (MCWD). Members were: PatricK Scully, Chair Robert Rascop Metro Council, uistrict 15 IMCD ";)air Has*inys Shorewood Dirk deVries Dare Cochran Metro Council, District 13 MCWD Minnetonka Deephaven Durothy Rietow Larry Donlin Metro Council, District Il ►layor, Minnetonka St. Louis Pa;!-. Minnetonka Donald Stein Walton Clevenger Metro Council, District 8 Mayor, Minnetrista Coon Rapids Minnetrista Michael McLaughlin Kathleen Wallace Metro Council, District 2 Minnesota DNR St. Paul St. Paul In October of 1985, the Council and the MCTFLM approved -. mission statement and a review procedure, including a work schedule. MCTFLM PLANNING PROCESS Following a November meeting with Lake Minnetonka communities, lake managing agencies and other concerned parties, the MCTFLM prepared a planning approach for its work on the iSSLIeS. A letter from MCTFLM Chair Scully (Appendix A) explains the process in detail. In summary, the municipalities and other public agencies were asked to show how they would implement the 1933 Lake Minnetonka Task Force (83TF) recommendations (see Background section) for creating reliable parking spaces for car/trailer combinations at or near public boat launches and for shoreline access sites. During December and January, the MCTFLM met to review data, to hear from members and informed sources on various aspects of the problems and to develop its own report outline. An outcome of those deliberations was a de^.ision to make process recommendations rather than attempting a point by point review of known sites. Another was the decision that implementation of the 83TF recommendations would to an appr,)priate way to begin to meet public needs for improved access to Lake Minnetonka. 'TASK FORCE DELIBERAi10NS The MCTFLM collected and considered the input communities sent in response to the Novembe- request. (Community input is attached a5 Appendix B.) The MCTFLM also developed draft position statements, inciuding findings and recommendations on eight issues identified as the areas which the task tome could analyze, make findings and produce recommendations (sometimes as a list of alternatives), as the central part of its report. The issues are: 1. Adequacy of Boat and Shoreline Access on Lake Minnetonka 2. King's Point Boat Launch Site 3. Non-iucal Fu^d ng for Land Related Development Costs 4. Non -local funding for on -lake costs 5. intergovernmental coordination 6. Municipal policies atout lake use and development 7. Commercial access 8. Status of research on lake use Education was mentioned fregUently as another issue area. During task force discu•,!:i.)n, the topic was addressed within several other issues and is included in the discussions on funding (no. 4), coordination (no. 5) and research (no. 8) . The community responses and draft positions rn the eight iss,.�r- were distri- buted prior to two public meetings which MCTFLM held. One was at Minnetonka on the lake, the other in Edina. 2 The MCTFLM considered public response at the meetings and prepared its report to the Metrop—.1itan Council, incorporating the task force positions on the issue and the findings and recommendations. This document const;tutes that report. HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE The nature and extent of Discussion and Debate about puh;ic access to Lake Minnetonka has been taking place many years. For example, in the 1960s and early 1970s, large recreation open space sites were suggested by agencies including the Hennepin County Park Reserve District. For a ✓ariety of reasons, no proposals resulted in acquisition and development of large recreation sites which could pro-ide free public boat launch access on the lake. One factor which may have affected this was that boating pressure was lighter, with fewer boats and fewc- numbers of boaters s,�Pking access. Also, developn�!nt in lake communities had not closed off as great a percent of the shoreline as is now the case. Many lake municipalities permitted boat launching from fire lanes or other unmanaged access points and undeveloped areas provided parking near those access points. As development has occurred, the access points have been closed. At the same time, an ;,nprecedented rise in boat. sales has increased the number of potential boaters several times. Significant public agency attention to boat launch sites on Lake Minnetonka occurred in 1979 when the Metro Water Access Task Force, made up of repre- sentatives from DNR, Metro Council and the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Deve'opment, self i Lr.e Minnetonka access as a priority goal for acquisition. By 1981, the currently contested King's Point site had been identified by DNR and steps for acquisition began. Minn=t-ista formally opposed the acquisition in February 1982. A very intense debate caused Governor Al Quie to direct the Commissioner of DNR to stop acquisition pro,eedings and the Lake Minnetonka Task Force (83TF, was set up as follows (from P. I, "Summary," 83TF report): The Lake Minnetonka Task Force ::s formed in July of 1982 to prepare a .eport and make recommendation- to the Governor and Minnesota Legislature addressing recreational use of Lake Minnetonka and adjacent public land. The three areas studied were: 1) adequacy of public access, 2) surface use patterns and conflicts, and 3) adequacy of lake management and enforcement programs. The 83TF report was released in "'..ay 1Fr The report summarized its findings and recommendations were as follows: ( 1-2, "Summary," 83TF report): The Task Force found that opportunities for both boat and shoreline access were inadeugate in some areas of the lake. It also found that, during peak weekend afternoons, boat density in some parts of the lake presents potentially hazardous conditions. Conflicts c?'ist in the form of big boats vs. smaller boats, fast boats vs. slower boats, swimmir-ldiv ng vs. boating, and fishing vs. pleasure boating. The body of existing law and regulations was `ound to be adequate, but enforcement is. limited by inadequate funding. The Task Force recognizes public parking availability as a crucial component of adequate public boat launch facilities. 3 The Task Force recommends that new boat and shoreline access opportunities be established in certain areas of the lake and that some existing access facilities be expanded and/or improved. The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) should continue to be the primary agency in coordinating the study, monitoring, and regulating of recreation use patterns that will balance the needs of the regional public, riparian interest, enjoyment and protection of the lake. Finally, adequate personnel and funding are required on a continuing basis to impremant these recommendations and to maintain the management of Lake Minnetonka for the continued assurance of quality recreational experiences. The report was accepted/endorsed by LMCD and DNR, among other responsible agencies, and some actions to implement the 83TF recommendations have begun. The remainder of this report is organized to coincide kith the issues list. ISSUE l: ADEQUACY" OF PUBLIC ACCESS TO LAKE MINNETONKA Discussion During their review, the Metropolitan Council'.. Task rorce on Lake Minnetonka (MCTFLM) considered the report of the 83TF. The 83TF found (p. 3) "that there is a ne i -nd a demand for additional access to Lake Minnetonka tc serve persons who wan, to fish and otherwise enjoy the lake in boats and from the shoreline. There is no demonstrated need for addi- tional lake access for boats other than fishing craft and small recreation boats. Because the majority of the existing publicly -owned boat launch capac- ity is located primarily n the nnr h and east shores of Lake Minnetonka, it is •pcommended that additional public ,coat launch opportunities be provided on the ith and west :;,corer. In identifying new access sites, the Task Force recom- mends that consideration 5e given to ten differen, site selection criteria. Further, there is opportunity for improvement _1 existirg boat launch ramps and scenic shore sites on Lake Minnetonka." The MCTFLM concluded t;iat the 83TF report was based on an accurate assessmen' of the status of the lake. A second body of data, in a 1984 DNR Metropolitan R!-ion lake use study, supported the idea that users entering the lake frc free public cress arc not the large t group of users on the lake. The study also showed that a large percent of users entering from free public access sites engaged in the rr._-o consumptive uses on the lake compered to those who entered from comrrercla; access sates and from riparian properties. This supports the 8371F conclusion that "there is a need and a demand for additional access to Lake Minnetonka to serve persons who wane to fish and otherwise enjoy the lake in boats and from the shoreline ... (and that)... additional public boat launch opportunities be provided on the south and west shores." The MCTfLM noted that DNR has accepted the 83TF report and committed itself to implementing the recommendations which are under its authority. The I.M.CD has also accepted the 83TF report and acted to implement some rf the recommendations by confirming some reliable parking areas. 4 on 985, an assessment of changes on the lake since release of the ;bowed that little had been accomplished to implement the ons. Input from the lake communities w;- interpreted by the MCTFLM to say that a rr•djor obL�acle to implementation lay in the communities' inability to control their jwn destinies, vying a local point of view. The MCTFLM accepted this posit,on and reque:.ted, during December 1985 and January 1986, that each com- munitN, develop a work plan which showed how the parking and access goals in the recommendations of the 1983 task force could be met in each zone of the lake. In addition to planning meetings with the communities, the MCTFLM also met tw?-p in the lake area for DNR to brief communities in zones 3 and 5 about its activities to find new access sites and for information exchange between communities, DNR and MCTFLM. With the exception of the work plan submitted by Minnetrista, the response of the municipalities prior to the time of writing was disappointing. The 83TF reported 185 reliable parking spaces divided between zones 1, 2 and 4. The goal was 700 reliable spaces for all five zones of the lake. Written input from 6 of 14 lake communities proposed some changes which increased the total number by 78 to 257 confirmed reliable parking spaces. Other parking spaces were identified, or proposed. The number of parki,ig spaces for car -trailers, by various coi!nts, may be as many as 402 plus a substantial number of spaces along county roads which are available for any kind of parking, ;ncluding car- t-aiiers. Many cannot be confirmed under the present definition or were proposed under conditions the task force. could not .:ept. Three communities made specific proposals which would implement. some part of the 83TF parking recommendations and only Minnetrista, one of the same three, suggested specific actions to implement new boat launch sites. Community input on shoreline access was very limited and little specific data was received about local or non -local costs of providing public access. F;ndings MCTFLM found that: 1. The 83TF cor,,- -ted a study of the status of public access to Lake Mi -�r•ka and i— at the findings and recommendations are still valid. iml.•_ 'ing the 83TF recommendations would improve public access and the genera duality of use on the lake. 2. The attempt to implement the 83TF recommendations by soli_- work plans from '.he lake communities has not resulted in a feasible p;a, dt this time. 3. The 83TF recommendations are appropriate goals to provide ti!e need I improvements for public access on Lake Minnetonka. Implementation of those goals seems to be blocked by conditions in two areas: - One is in the relationship and zoordination of var ous governmental a.id agenty authorities involved in implementing the recommendations. 5 - The other is in the limited funding available to the responsible agencies. 4. The 83TV statement about the status of F jl'c boat launch and shoreline accc:;s for Lake Minnetonka is accepted as follows: "The Task Force finds that there is a need and a demand frr additional, access to Lake Minnetonka to serve persons wl want to fish and otherwis° enjoy the la4:e in boats and from the sri:,rel ine. There is no demonstrated need for additional lake access for Ljats other than fishing craft and small recreation boat-. Because t'rie majority of the existing public:y- owned boat launch apacity is located primarily on the nor!n and east s;iores of Lake Minnetonka, it is recommended that, additior.-I public boat launch opportunities be provided on t"e south and west shores. In identify- ing new access sites, the Task Force recommends that consideration be given to ten different site selection criteria. Further, there , �Ppportunily for provement of existing boat launcr, ramps and scenic s:.. o sites or Lake Minnetonka. The Task Force conclude; that a key factor to providing the public with access to Lake Minnetonka is the provision of adequate, legal, safe car - trailer parking within a reasonable distance from a I,unchinr ramp. On - street parking of car -trailer units, through sometimes necessary, is less desirable than off-street parking. For on -street oar -king locations to be considered reiiable, they should be supported by Tong-te-m written agree- ments between the appropriate publ�c cr private group and the LK7 , and they should be properly 'dertified with signs as approved asses,. parking. Throughout the Task Force deliberations en public access, the desirab'lity of and nixed for additional on -site parking a launching ramp ites, olo or new, was almost taken as a "given" in any discussion. It the same time, Lakeshore market va!ucs in some eas ake the achieve.nert of this goa: an expensive project." As stated by one MCTFLA member: "Lake Minnet--'7! is in the process of be-aming an urban lake !t's important tr "Acisions to provide appropriate and adequa,., public: access be n+ade now, c some resources are still available. No one has ever question--.d the w,sdom of providing public access on the Minneapolis Lakes, it's Ling now to do the same on Lake Minnetonka. The problems are two: first, the will (or willingness) to imp!eme.-t the nrressary action second, the f i nances to carr y therf, out." Reconnendations "hat action is needed to provide more and getter quality bi— access at boat launches for small craft and fishing Lzats and at shoreline accesr points as pa-t of the regulation of surface use on Lake Minnetonka. 2. That two immediate actions should occur: a. tstaL ;sh a new process for planning and -egulat,ng su, ace _•P a►r. Mi nneto xa, as out! i ned under- I ntergoverr,m^.r*.a ! Coord, r on : eke Minnetonka, elsewhere in this report (see page 12). 6 b. Provide expanded funding for the new activit, levels prescribed in the sections on Intergovernmental Coordination and Non -Local Funding, elsewhere in this report (see pages 8, 10 and 12). ISSUE 2: KING'S POINT BOAT LAUNCI; SITE Note: issue posit on subject to change to accord with results of negotiatirn.) Introduction At the Feb. 12 meeting, the MCTFLM approved a motion which directed staf. to draft a position paper on the issue of DNR's plan to develop a boat launch on the King's Point site on Halsted's Bay which was consistent with the position taken c he issue '-)y the city of Minnetrista. Discussion flee MCTFt.M has heard detailed presentations he issue from both DNR and hinnetrista, has reviewer: the report of the 83TF and has card extensive com- ment on Vi ;ssue frc!m Luther sources including persons ledgeabre about the lake. Li -,dings (Sub j ec: c to Chant In their consideration of testimony on tree issue, the MCT- •'. f.,und that th• weight of evidence was against DNR's development -if a boas launch site at ting's Point at this time, for the fol lov,•ing rea..c .s among others: - There are ether existing or alternate n cess points on Halsted's Bay which appear to offer :'-quate access or. -_.t body of water, especially if developed as proposed in toe work plan by 11inretrista. fhe King's P->int site is inconsistent -gith local land use plans and should not overriev zac h plans unless its nece,sity and ability to achieve a major ,,ublic bt +fit can be demonstrated. Discussions -about `ra proposal have not demonst.'ated thvt benefit. - The 83TF and Other input on the need fc new boat launch site - Minnetonka do .,.,t indicate that Halsted's Bay is dasi able 1.':jce to pro- vi + all the incraated access needed 'r' zone 5 or zn i upper lake. The -;^eci•rc recommendation nor Smithtown Bay adjacent waters seems to be a mort logical choice for a new access s`tr n zone 5, both f reason of lake areas made accessitilt and for rood PCLebs. Reco"sndation (Subj-,ct Vi Change) That t .;r Aetropo 1 i tan Council i nfo; .__ ..;w Governor and the S Late Excrut i ve Council that Minnesota L'AR development of the boat launch site or King's Poirt, Halsted's Say of Lake Minnetonka, 0ould not proceed until it can be shown that no better alternate can prov'de ad-quats Public small boat access on th ke. 7 ISSUE 3: NON -LOCAL FUNDING FOR COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH LAND -RELATED DEVELOPMENTS The MCTcLM included the issue in recognition that there are costs to surround- ing governments when a lake access site is placed on the shoreline. The issue was repeatedly identifed by the communities. Discussion When the December -January 1986 work plan contents were sugges:ed to the municipalities and agencies, cost estimates were specifically requested for: - Creating the 700 reliable parking spaces, - Acquisition, devel-.)pment and operations for any new access sites, - Needed street improvements for access streets to new and existing launch sites, - Improvements to existing boat launch sites, and - Improvements to shoreline access sites. Few work plans were received from the municipalities. Of those received, two contained speci`;c cost estimates as follows: The Minnetriste pi-n, p. 13, estimates that the development costs of "any one site" has "capita. costs upward of $500,000 (exclusive of capital costs to local government)" and that capital costs to municipalities are a burden, "such as road improvements up to $500,000... at King's Point." Minr,etriSLa's document contains no other cost estimates. The letter from Shorewood contains the specific estimate that one property considered by DNR as a zone 3 boat launch site will cost $1 million to acquire. It curtains no other cost estimates. No other input from the municipalities reported or estimated costs to municipalities for public access to Lake Minnetonka. The task force discussions brought out the following information: 1. Based on input from, DNR and regional recreation open space implementing agencies, development costs o1 )oat launch sites typically range from $50,000 to $100,000 in the mt >olitan region, for a moderate sized access with approximately 25 car -trailer spaces. Costs tend to be higher where a site requires more engineering to overcome difficult site conditions. The costs of on -site development are borne by the developing agency and are not an expense to the mu-'i_ipality unless it is also the implementing agency. 2. Costs for road improvements to a boat launch site fall on a municipality if the access road is a city street. If the Traffic generated by the access sites mandates road improvements, a significant local expenditure could be compelled. The expenditure is clearly for services to a constituency from outside the municipality. No non -local funds appear to be available to municipalities in this event. 3. Costs to municipalities for police, fire and medical emergency service to boat launch sites on Lake Minnetonka are said to be substantial by the Minnetrista work plan and by local governmental officials on the MCTFLM. No specific costs or cost estimates were reported to the task force. 8 f 4. Operating and maintenance costs for boat launch sites operated by munici- palities were also suggested as significant cost areas by Minnetrista and by verbal input from Tonka Bay (during information meetings). No date or estimates on this topic were included in the work plans received. Staff inquiries for specifics from the municipalities were unsuccessful. A regional recreation agency collected operating costs for two large active boat launch sites on other Hennepin County lakes. In 1985 they were approximately $9,000 and $11,000, respectively. The $11,000 figure included material and labor costs for a make-ready dock and rip - rapping. Maintenance costs on the larger and more active boat launches on Lake Minnetonka are supported by Hennepin County Department of Transportation (DOT). Hennepin County DOT also provides toilets and trash pickup at several other public access sites on the lake (presumably those are along county roads). Operation and maintenance of new free public boat launch sites on Lake Minnetonka -,)uld be the responsibility of the implementing agency. Findings Acquisition, development and operation and maintenance costs of new fre- boat launch and other public access sites on Lake Minnetonka should be the responsibility of the implementing agency. 2. The 83TF listed highway accessibility as one criterion for access site selection. If the site selected is on a city street, the municipality may need help for road improvement expenditures compelled by the access site. tre may be significant costs to municipalities for providing police, fire ,' emergency medical service to public access sites on Lake Minnetonka. Tric scale of current expenditures by municipalities for these costs is not known. 4. Maintenance costs for those public access sites on Lake Minnetonka which provide the greater number of reliable car -"trailer parking space for public use are provided by the implementing agencies. The amount of ooerating and maintenance costs expended by municipalities on other sites on the lake which provide free public access is not known. Recommendations The costs to municipalities and other operating agencies for providing free public access to Lake Minnetonka should be itemized and confirmed by LMCD and the municipalities. 2. LMCD should develop recommendations to meet costs of providing free public access to Lake Minnetonka from a non -local source at a level commensurate with expenditures municipalities make to provide access to users outside their constituency. W ISSUE 4: NON -LOCAL FUNDING FOR ON -LAKE COSTS The area is the one in which most operating expenditures are made for providing and regulating public access to the lake. The adequacy of funds and the ser- vices they provide are important to the agencies which are responsible for lake management and to the municipalities. Discussion Staff ccilected input from agencies currently active on the lake and found principal expenditures to be as follows: Activity 1985 Enforcement -- Water patrol 1985 Enforcement -- Conservation officers on lake and in lake vicinity 1985 Lake and Access -- Channel mainte- nance, dredging, shoreline pro- tection, buoys and signage; access main- tenance, trash collection. satellites (toilets) 1985 Permitting. information and education. research. enforcement. other. Agency Amount Source Hennepin Co. $285,000e -Minn. grant, Sheriff's Dept. $119,000 O ncl. unrefunded gas tax. boat license, federal 0-J) -Henn. Co. budget, $166,000 Minn. DNR $45.000 DNR budget (est.) Henn. Co. DOT $88,000 Henn. Co. budget LMCD $110,000 Levy and license fee. $95,000 *This amount is expended county -wide, an estimated 80 percent is for Lake Minnetonka. a Additional expenditures include (amounts not accurately known because items are within larger budgets): - Suburban Hennepin Regional Park Distract islands, toilet and trash cleanup, other picnic facility maintenance. - Communities --access (boat launch and shoreline) toilet and trash cleanup are assumed, no specific data has been received on this topic. - Minnesota DNR--information and education, especially about boating safety plus cooperative enforcement -related activities with Hennepin County Sheriff's water patrol. finding Funding for enforcement and maintenance on Lake Minnetonka is not adequate to meet the present need. Funds for research, planning, administration and education/awareness are so inadequate that they are limiting needed activity. Recommendation Funding sources should be found and adequate allocations made to support the agencies carrying out needed activities on the lake. The following alternatives are recommended: 1. An increase in the boating safety fund and an increase in grants from that fund made by the state to operating agencies. There are two possible sources from which the fund may be increased. The first possibility is that the Minnesota Legisla'vre can increase the allocation made to the boat safety account from existing sources. Second, added revenues can come to the fund from increased boat license fees in Minnesota. An increase in boat fund revenues should be followed by an increase in grants to the active agencies. The increase should be above the current base operating allocations and should be distributed by a supplementary formula that recognizes and encourages local effort. 2. LMCD and other authorized agencies should maximize revenues from permit fees, marina fees and other development and commercial use fees. The task force recognizes that such fees are normally able to cover the cost of services at best, thus are not likely to constitute a significant source of revenue for new activities. 3. Some MCTFLM members continue to urge consideration for a special license fee for all boats using Lake Minnetonka. The advantages of such a program lie in its equity and its direct tie to users. Task force members recognized the difficulty of such an approach, which lies in the perception of many decision -makers statewide who fear that a special sticker for any one lake will open the floodgates to demands for a sticker for every major lake in the state. Clearly, this alternative requires major legislation changing the way license revenues are raised. 4. The LMCD tax levy should be outside the lakeshore communities' 'cry 1 mits and should be levied directly. ISSUE 5: INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ON LAKE MINNETONKA Although adequacy of access was stated as the primary issue, the MCTFLM identi- fied the status of intergovernmental coordination as a major contributing factor to the problems about surface use and public access on Lake Minnetonka. Background In 1983, the earlier Lake Minnetonka Task Force concluded that overlap in governmental authorities/responsibilities provided "the potential for confusion and conflict" and recommended that all agencies involved on the lake should meet. coordinate and clarify their roles and prepare a negotiated memorandum of understanding which would specify each agency's roles and responsibilities. Since 1983, the LMCD has discussed the issue and at a planning workshop in October 1985, developed the idea that a "one -stop permit shop," a clearing- house, would be a useful aid to the public on the lake. Discussion Inquiry among the agencies with responsiblities on the lake suggzsted the following areas of overlap: - Boat Launch Sites: DNR has a mandate to acquire adequate public access. The counties, the municipalities and Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District (SHRPD) all have authority, under varying circumstances, to acquire, develop and operate lake access sites. - Regulation of Lake Surface Use: LMCD has statutory responsibility specific to Minnetonka, DNR has statutory responsibility statewide, and lake ;ounici- palities may have some authorities in this area. Hennepin and Carver Counties and SHRPO have authority in manag1'r1g some aspects of lake surface use. - Planning and enforcement for public water safety/boating safety: LMCD, DNR and Hennepin County have responsibilities. - Control over developments or improvements in the lake: LMCD, DNR and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) all have statutory responsibil- ity. Municipalities have some, again, mostly implemented through LMCD. SHRPD and Hennepin County each have some specific responsibilities. - Control over marinas: LMCD has authority to regulate marinas including some controls over their location, the density of use and license fees. DNR and the municipalities have some authority over marinas as well. - Control of dredging: DNR, MCWD and Hennepin County are all involved in dredging (licensing, regulating, permitting and implementing). LMCD is involved if vegetation removal is part of the dredging. - Water quality and quantity: LMCD, DNR, PCA, MCWD, municipalities and counties all have some statutory responsibilities and/or authorities. - Control over land use, zoning and development adjacent to the lake: Municipalities are the principal authorities in land use and land use planning. Other agencies with various author:ties in this area include: MCWD, DNR, Counties, Metropolitan Council and MWCC. 12 The MCTFLM conclude_ i•iat there is indeed overlap in governmental authorities on and around Lake Minnetonka and that this overlap may contribute to the prob- lems which develop over access and surface use of the iake. Conflicting Authorities Many problems on Lake Minnetonka stem from the opposition of two statutory responsibilities for this resource. The State of Minnesota, through DNR, has a statutory authority and a mandate to provide for adequate public access facilities for all the state's citizens to Lake Minnetonka as well as all oth� akes in the state. The DNR also nas various authorities over surface use, water use and related activities. Municipalities a-ound the lake have statutory authority to provide fo, the health, safety and welfare of their constituents through local land planning. In many instances they carry out planning related to the lake through LMCD, which has extensive statutory powers. See Appendix C, sections 3, 4 and 5, for a full listing of LMCD powers. Proper use of the surface of the lake is among those areas of LMCD authority. This implies that the most appropriate planning bodies are DNR and LMCD. How- ever, the LMCD statute does not clearly provide and the municipalities have not delegated any local planning authorities to LMCD which apply from the shoreline into the land. The only coordination of planning on land lies in the compre- hensive plan of each municipality, coordinated by the Metropolitan Council under the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. Many of the immediate contentions iie in those conflicts with local plans created by locating a public facility on land in a municipality. The conflict is not totally unique to lake access sites, it occurs for other regional and state facilities such as roads, parks, and waste sites. Plan Adequacy and Implementation The MCTFLM has also dealt with the wider problem of a process which wou!d: 1) develop a plan for regulating use so as to provide the best quality and quantity of use with the least degradation of the lake, and 2) provide adequate impetus for the plan to be carried out. The 1983 task force had adequately identified major problems and proposed appro- priate general solutions. Adequate implementation of the solutions has not occurred. A part of the problem may be that the solutions proposed were nct specific enough. The greate- problem has probably been the lack of resources and of reasons to implement, the recommendations. A procesr calling for greate activity by responsib!c agencies must also identify funds to carry it out. Findings 1. Overlapping powers exist among the agencies which have responsibilities around Lake Minnetonka for effective and efficient government. The over- laps should be isolated and analyzed. Not all the overlaps are undesir- able, sonic may represent necessary fail-safe mechanisms. 2. In addition to a better coordinated program of aut.norities on the lake, the MCTFLM finds that a process is needed both to develop a plan which will appropriately regulate 'oke use and to provide impetus to inclement the solutions developed. 13 Recommendations That the LMCD become the lead agency to convene a meeting or series of meetings of representatives of ali agencies/governmental bodies with author- ity on Lake Minnetonka, to identify and analyze overlapping authorities on the lake and to develop a memorandum of understanding which would specify each agency's role and responsiblities. 2. That some revision in authorities on Lake Minnetonka take place which would incorporate present structures and authorities, expand authorities for certain existing authorities and expend new funds to achieve certain objectives. A schedule for the changes is included in the recommendation. a. The LMCD should become more active, continuing to use its present powers to carry out its functions, including regulation of lake use and a lake -wide access plan, but with a wider exertion of its author- ity (which may need to be increased in certain areas) to coordinate planning and implementation of other activities in the lake shore communities which effect lake surface use. LMCD should become the lead agency for comprehensive plan review and planning for use of the lake. This function should be consistent with Metropolitan Council planning coordination, as it may pertain. LMCD should also adopt certain more restrictive ordinances on lake use, as it has recently done on the DWI ordinance. A suggested specific example would be to further reduce night •ime and peak use time speed limits. The LMCD, cooperatively with DNR and the Sheriff's Water Patrol, should continue and expand its educational activities. b. Hennepin County should continue its present activities on the lake through the Sheriff's Water Patrol and the lake maintenance operations of the Department of Transportation. The MCTFLM, Minnesota DNR and LMCD agree that expansion of the Sheriff's Water Patrol, which has occurred over approximately the last ten years, should continue until the patrol is at a strength fully equal to its responsibilities, which have increased with added public use. County DOT maintenance must also grow to match increases in public use. C. A principal recommendation is that a regional recreation open space implementing agency, most logically the Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District (SHRPD), should prepare a master plan and acquire, develop and operate a regional recreation open space entity on the lake. The facility should be consistent with applicable plans and should incorporate existing regional properties, ether new parcels i(I the lake any on the lakeshore which may be necessary for its function as a significant regional recreation facility. The facility should provide the following regional functions, among others: staging areas for ferry or other access to islands in the regional park, shoreline access and docks for fishing, areas for viewing the lake and shore- line, parking and sanitary facilities, and boat rentals. Appropriate launch facilities for small craft and fishing boats should be included, especially in zones 3 and 5. The plan should be prepared by the implementing agency, reviewed by LMCD and DNR and approved by the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission and Metropolitan Council. In the event that SHRPD is unable or unwilling to implement. 14 the proposed new regional facility, LMCD should be requ•!sted to carry out the task as a regional implementing agency. In the latter event, modification of LMCD's legislative authority may be required (see Appendix C) . d. Minnesota DNR should continue its present activities on the fake .including: - Providing enforcement by conservation officer patrol including recent expansion in the amount of hours spent on the lake by an increased enforcement staff. - Continue to carry out its other statutory responsibilities for such tasks as permit review and wetland, lake b-,ttom and water protection. - Continue to implement those parts of the 83TF recommendations which lie within its authorities, but with closer coordination with LMCD with particular respect to the selection (i.e., needs assessment, priorities and nrocess for selection) of boat launch and/or shoreline access sites and for research about lake use. The Commissioner of DNR should specifically confer wit:i LMCD as an ad hoc participant in its process of developing a plan for lake access. DNR should strive to implement the 83TF plan and other future actions on Lake Minnetonka which affect public access to the lake in a manner which is consistent with applicable plans. e. Other authorities are responsible for various parts of the overall management and protection of Lake Minnetonka. Examples include MCWD, Carver County, MnDOT, the lake cor.ununities, and there are others still. All should continue, no recommendation of the MCTFLM should be interpreted as calling for a reduction in those activities. 3. Funding is required to support the acLivities recommended in 2 above, as follows. Present funding is too limited to carry out the recommended expanded activity. a. LMCD is currently funded from two principal sources: revenues from marina licensing and a levy upon its member municipalities. To carry out its increased and more proactive role. MCTFLM recommends: 1) That the support received from member municipalities be continued to LMCD, within the currently authorized n,'milage limit but with the change that the levy become a special levy not subject to the statutory limits set on the municipalities. This would confer greater visibility on a major funding source for the more active LMCD as well as make the task of raising the funds easier for the municipalities. 2) That the support received from marina regulatory fees be continued and maximized to the extent -easonable and proper. While some increased revenues may be real;zed from this source. they will probably not be adequate of themselves. This source 15 may be affected by discussions going on in the s' le regarding the authority to charge fees for any commercial i- :ivity in which a state resource, such as r, water body or its br ,3ms, is ised by entrepreneurs. �) That LMCD receive increased funds from other than its levy for its planning and regulatory activities v:hich go beyond the local interest. Those funds could appropriately be from a boating safety source as they will serve to increase boating safety through research and education. b. Hennepin County 1) The Sheriff's Water Patrol is currently funded in part from state boating safety funds and in part from the Hennepin County budget. The sources appear appropriate to MCTFLM which suggests that some increase is appropriate from the state boating safety source (this source and its expansion is discussed below) for increases in enforcement, which benefit all users, and for increased activ- ity in safety planning and education. Some increase in Hennepin County funds to the Sheriff's patrol are also appropriate in light of the fact that the great majority of Lakc Minnetonka users are from Hennepin County. �) Similar arguments for increased county support of the county DOT maintenance operations appear appropriate, based on the majority percent of usership from Hennepin County. C. Regional Recreation Open Space 1) Acquisition and development dollars for new regional recreation opei space features on the lake should come from a special appro- priation of state bond funds as an eiemen,. : t•z Regional Recreation Open Space Ca�'..i Improvement Program. Lake Minnetonka qualifies as a regional resource and the opportunity Lo do something significant occurs here. There have been other instances (e.g., Como Zoo) where the legislature has recognized that a special area or ;.CJ ecL merits special funding for resolu- tion of a critical situation. It should be treated in such a way as to enable a timely solution without handicapping the long- range Glans for orderly development of the rest of the regional system. i?) Operations and maintenance funds for a regional recreation open space agency are another important consideration. If a major new entity is funaed for quick development, a rapidly increased operating burden is placed on the operating agency. Given the general condition of operating budgets today, this could be a real impediment to aciion. MCTFLM recommends that this project receive a timely special supplement during "start-up" which will provide adequate dollars for the agency to begin operations and make provisions for continuing support in its regular operating budge, process. This sort of problem was specifically addressed in the Metropolitan Council'-, position statement on regional recreation 0 b M; no new direction appears necessary. (See Appendix D, the Council's position statement o reg:;nal C b M supplementary funding.) 16 d. State boating safety fund increases are recommended. The fund could be increased by legislative action increasing the annual allocation from existing sources. Added revenue to the safety fund coul•J alsc: come from increased boat license fees. A substantial portion of the increased safety funds should be granted for special projects to active agencies such as Hennepin County Sheriff's Patrol and the LMCD to support boating safety services. Increases to the agency grants should be tied to increased local effort. The MCTFLM also considered the issue of a separate license or sticker as a source of revenue from boaters on Lake Minnetonka. The task force found the source attractive for its applicability and equity but recogni_ed the policy issue it raises, namely, should DNR then enter into a special sticker fir every lake in the state which is attractive to large groups of boaters? The issue is a major problem to a lake license approach. v. The MCTFLM recommends the following schedule: a. Implementation of the recommendations of the 1983 task force for park- ing, new boat launches, and shoreline access should be carried out, or a firm schedule for their implementation agreed to, by the end of calendar year 1987. The actions will be carried out by DNR, LMCD and specific affected municipalities. b. A legislative rernmmendation for �iapitai and operating funding of the new regional rec tion open space entity, based upon a ge.eral plan prepared by the , lementing agency should be completed and igreed to by the agency, DNR. and Metropolitan, Counci', in time for presentation to the 1987 legislature. C. A legislative proposal for the increased o• modified authorities for LMCD and the recommended change in its levy structure should be pre- pared by October 1986 for presentation to the 1987 legislature. d. A legislative proposal to increase revenur.s to the state boating safety fund from either existing sources or from increased boat license fees should be prepared by October of 1986 for presentation to the 1987 legislature. e. The specifics of new boat launch site selection, to be worked out by LMCD, DNR, Metro Council a.id the regional implementing agency, are dependent in par, upon events at King's Point. if ONR were to heft development at King's Point for the 1986 season, with a clear intent to proceed in 1987 unless an apprapriate alternate site is found, stimulus to cooperate would seem to be there for LMCD, Minnetrista and the other south shore/upper lake communities. If that exploration of sites took place, a site for the regional entity as well as the "small boat/angler" site which DNR seeks could possibly be identified in the same process. It seems logical that DNR. Metro Council, the regional implementing agency, LMCD and the municipalities might all participate in that site review, with DNR reserving its intent and authority to proceed at King's Point if no specifics emerge. (Recommendation sub_Ject to position on Issue 2.) 17 5. Metropolitan Coun.:,i staff shall report to the Metropolitan Systems Com- mittee on activit;,; on Lake Minnetonka by LMCD, SHRPD and other active agencies by Jan. 1;, 1987. If no progress or inadequate progress is the case, as judged by Metropolitan Council, an increasingly directive proce- dure should begi.i. Three possibilities have been advanced for courses of action in that event, others may exist. - Action could be initiated by Metropolitan Council and other interested partiies for legislation to reconstitute LMCD. In discussions about the possibility, MCTFLM suggested a new governing board, dra from non -lake communities plus representatives of other interesteu govern- ments and agencies, with a reduced member of representatives from the '.ake communities. Other changes in the LMCD's enabling legislation would also be needed. - Critical Area designation is a second more directive alternative considered. - Metropolitan Significance Review was the third. In any event, the decision to proceed with a stronger directive to achieve implementation appears as an important part of this task force recom- mendation if timely action does not occur. ISSUE o: MUNICIPAL POLICIES WHICH RELATE TO LAKE USE AND DEVELOPMENT ON THE LAKE This issue was added in recognition that the lakeshore communities have adopted policies which may either help or hinder provision of adequate free public access to the lake and thus can be major influences on surface use. The issue is mentioned in the 83- repurt, as follows: "The Task Force commends those Municipalities that have provided public lake access and recommends that lakeshore municipalities, when managing access sites under their control and when considering new lakeshore devel- opment., give particular atttention to the goal of improving access for fishing craft and small recreation boats. "The Task Force recommends that implementing agencies and lakeshore munici- palities cooperate in monitoring any future land use changes at existing commercial access sites. Consideration should be given to creation of a public access site at any existing commercial access location prior to possible future rezoning of such a site to multiple dwelling or other non - lake access use." When encouraging municipalities which have policies that aid public access, the 83TF did not speak to the opposite, that is, policies which work against public access. There are at least two ways in which these may occur:. - A municipality's policy (and zoning) may favor private and commercial developments which increase lake use, without providing free public access. Municipal policies may directly or indirectly prohibit free public acce including public access where it may otherwise be appropriate. 18 D: 'a It is not clear if MCTFLM has received specific inpu was Recommenoatior, the 83TF studies collected information on this topic. The no r cords other than anecdotal mention of examples. No received from the municipalities on this issue. That the report of the MCTFLM describe the issue and recommend ;t as a prior;ty issue to be addressed by LMCD. LMCD has excellent access to the municipalities for d-ita. `taff assistance, i.e., technical assistance, could reasonably come to LMCD f.-om the Metropolitan Council, because of that staff's exoerience in comprehensive planning and zoning irsues. A useful product of this study, among others, could be an Inventory of those party of Lake minnetonka's shore- line where boat launc." rf and other public snorelin-. access are not prohibited by pol;cy or zoning conflict. lvith this inventory, decisions about future public -:es,: could be based on a -ore realistic view of what is and is not possible_ -uer current lok.al plan controls. ISSUE ;: COMMERCIAL ACCESS TO THE LAKE Large numbers of lake users enter t;y for -fee aceess point„ both from rented or 'eased storage and across ramps for which a fee is charged. As the largest single group of users, more numerous than either riparian owners or those using free public launch sites, this group is a major fact in lake use events and must be considered in decision making. Tme ;ssue is mentioned in the 83TF report, as follows: "There are two principal forms of privately owned lake access facilities: commer--,al marinas, and food/entertainment .:stablishments. "Commerc al marinas provide many important. services required on any public lake. These services range from simple directions and general boating information, to gas, maintenance and boating accessories, to boat sales, storage and public access. Many of these are provided free but others are necessarily provided at a charge. The LMCD should encourage the diversity of services provided by commercial marinas on Lake Minnetonka." Data It is not clear if the 83TF studies collected data on tnis topic. No input was received from the municipalities on this issue. The 1984 DNR-commissioned sur- face use study could not acquire direct information on users from this source though soma information was derived by inference. 19 Recommendation That the MCTFLM report descrihe `he issue and recommend further study on use from commercial access as an mrortant data source to guide several surface use decisions. Specificaily, it would be very helpful to determine the following characteristics about users from commercial access f `5: - Numbers and use t as; - Type of use; ant - Origin, destiny on and zones or sub zones of greatest use. The information should be acquired with other information in the process recom- mended by MCTFLM whicn calls f.)r a more active LMCD, working in conjunction with continued research by PNR and by the Metropolitan Council. ISSUE 8: RESEARCH ON RECREATION USE OF LAKE MINNETONKA Introduction Several agencies and groups have co ducted research recreational use Lake Minnetonka. The issue for the task force was whether any of this data is of sufficient quality to be of use in making policy decisions regarding lake use. n order to judge the quality of data, one must consider its: Validity, that is, whether the research method yielded a true picture of use at the time the data was collected, and 2. Reliability, ti is, tihether the research method was repeated often enough to account i.)- ne variation in use that occurs at different times, on different days and under varying use conditions. Each source of data on lake use will be evaluated on these tF-o points. Who Has Collected Data on Use of Lake Minnetonka? Several agencies have collected data on use of Lake Minnetonka. The following five efforts have yielded data useful in task force discussions. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) The LMCD has collected data on surface use and shoreline boat storage for several years, the last being done in 1982. Surface use data includes numbers of boats in various parts of the lake at peak times on summer peak day The boats are classified as to type. Pric.• to 1981. the counts were made from an airplane. In 1981 and 1983, counts were made from aerial photographs. Boats stored in slips along the shoreline have been counted +r•d classified for several years as well. This is generaily done at a low use time -f the season when the maximum number of boats are li-.ely io be i, '.heir slips. The counts are made by boat. 2. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) The DNR has conducted two different kinds of studies on Lake Minnetonka. First, the standard "creel census" work done as part of ongoing fish man- agement of the lake. The most recent of these studies was done in 1975. 20 Information collected included fishing and cther surface use pressure on the lake in terms of man-hours. The data was collected by persons in a boat doing interviews and instantaneous counts of boating activity in 30 specific sections of the lake. Standard analysis mrthods have been developed for this type of work. The DNR also conducted an evaluation of surface use in Lake Minnetonka in 1984 as part of a larger similar study of several Metropolitan Area lakes. This study used a variety of methods to portray use of the water surface, public accesses, private access and riparian shoreline access. Surface use data was collected by airplane flyovers on nine summer days, at varying times during the day. Public and private access interviews were conducted on a minimum )f 10 days distributed before, during and after the summer season. Resident lakeshore owner data was collected in July, September and October. Access users we,-! interviewed immediately following their boating trip. Residents were asked to recall their most recent boating occasion on the lake. The access interview:; collected a wide variety of data including time of use; parking location; primary activity while on the lake; motor size; miles driven to ti,,.; launch site; ooating •y experience, training and opinion; access preferences; opinion on us_ trictions; income; and use of and opinion about alcoholic beverages whine boating. The surface use flyovers collected data on number and type of boats. The interviews and surface use data were combined to estimate the proportion of surface use resulting from public accesses, private accesses and riparian landowners. The study was done under contract by Biocentric, Inc. 3. Metropolitan Council (MC) Metropolitan Council parks and open space staff have interviewed public access users at North Arm and Spring Park (1978, 1982) and Gray's Bay Dam (1982). Each access was covered for a minimum of eight four-hour sampling periods Qn summer weekends and 12 periods on summer weekdays. Boaters were interviewed as they were taking their boats out of the lake. Information collected include: a. Time boat launching occurred. b. Type(s) of activities done by boaters. C. Reasons why that particular boat access was used. d. Number of people in the boat and their ages. e. Perceptions the boater had of lake water quality reasons for choosing this lake. f. Size of boat motor (if applicable). problems and boater's g. Whether the boater parked in the access parking lot h. Boater's perception of whether the lake was crowded number of boats on the lake increased, decreased or the boater's enjoyment of the lake. 4. Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol or elsewhere. i2nd whether the had no effect on The water patrol has compiled extensive statistics on ',oating ectivity as part of its law enforcement duties on Lake M;-)netonka. Each reported or detected incident of theft, ordinance violat.on, accident, drowning, etc., is recorded by location, date and time. The data goes back for several years, and a summary report is presented to the LMCn r cach year. 21 5. Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District (SHRPD) The SHRPD has collected data on use of its properties on Lake Minnetonka since 1978. These properties are on Big Island, Wild Goose island and Wawatasso Island. The data is collected by SHRPD research staff or ranger personnel and is reported by month. User numbers are all that is reported. In addition, the SHRPD did a stu-' of the Gray's Bay Causeway Access in 1981. User numbers, activity, length of stay, equipment and origin were observed during this study. What )o We Know About Recreation Use of Lake Minnetonka? In reviewing research conducted over the last 10 yea,, the task force con- cluded that the data do not support wide-ranging conclo,!-)ns about lake use. Research has been either narrowly focused or has involved the testing of new data collection methods with little repetition. In most cases, the validity of a given piece of informati-.�i, can only be determined by comparison to a similar piece collected by another agency at another lime. Only a very small number of studies possess sufficient validity and reliabiiity to sand on their own. However, there is some useful information. For example, consistent data from the DNR. and LMCD show that peak use is about 2,200 boats at auout 2 p.m. on a good summer Sunday. The approaches yield very consistent data when standard- ized for time and type of day. The LMCD data goes back 10 years. The rates of change are somewhat larger than increases in other types of water -based recrea- tion activity in the Metropolitan Area over this time period. The percent of boats of various kinds at peak time doesn't show a clear pattern. Major cate- gories are significantly different when comparing LMCD data and the two most recent DNR studies. There are some definitional inconsistencies as well. The LMCD data on boat types shows an increase in the proportion of runabouts and miscellaneous boats at peak times. The proportions of other types are steady to slightly declining. A second piece of information concerns the number of boats stored on lake Minnetonka. The LMCD data shows that cruisers have increased their proportion, rowboats and miscellaneous craft have decreased, and the proportions of other types have remained relatively steady. Quite a bit of information has been collected on public access users at least at the larger sites. About 50 percent of them are there primarily for fishing. This proportion varies only 4 percent over four independent DNR and Metropolitan Council studies. The mean distance travelled to launch is about 19 miles for the major public accesses. Limited DNR and MC data indicates that distances travelled for the minor accesses is less. About 25 percent of public access users think the lake is crowded. Limited MC data indicates this rises to about 60 percent at peak times. Average motor size is about 85 horsepower. Activity data reported by the Sheriff's Water Patrol shows that the primary time for violations is during the weekend evening hours (Frida, and Saturday). The number of "activities," which include citations, warnings, -iccidents, prop- erty crimes and miscellaneous incidents, has been nearly constant for the last three years at approximately 2300. Results are mixed as to whether the pattern of activities is being dispersed to more and more sections of the lake. It should t^ remembered that changes in actual amounts of activity from police records may be difficult to determine because of limits on staff available to note activity during busy times and variation in patrol patterns. 22 Use data reported by SHRPD shows that use of the Minnetonka Islands is increasing. However, major variations in some years and the problems inherent in estimating this kind of dispersed use makes it difficult to confirm patterns or rates of change. Summary of the Research Situation Research on recreation use of Lake Minnetonka is characterized by the validity and reliability problems discussed earlier. The valid, reliable studies (LMCD peak boat counts and Water Patrol activity tallies) collect only a limited amount of data. The broad studies --MC access studies and DNR lake use studies -- have been repeated too few times to build a reliable data bas-. These broad studies, after a period of testing, have developed good methods for monitoring conditions on the lake. Specifically, the 1984 DNR study is probably the most valid approach that can be found to study lake and access use. However, the assumptions and resultant analysis methods of this approach require substan- tially more data before reliability can be achieved. This is not to say that the fi•,: ngs of the DNR. study are unreasonable. On the contrary, where comparable studies exist, findings of the 1984 DNR study are similar to those of the other studies. it simply mears that more data must be collected to build a defensible case about the use of Lake Minnetonka. Research V ewed in Light f Task Force Issues The task -ce anal :-1 eight issues in developing its recommendations concern- ing Lake h nnatonke he status and applicability of research with respect to these issues is discus ed here. Primary Issue 1--Adequacy of Bort. and Shoreline Access on Lake Minnetonka An evaluation of adequacy require a measure of adequacy. In this case, the basic measure of adequate public access is one car -trailer parking space per 2C acres of lake surface. This is a guideline developed by the Metro Water Access Task force (Metropolitan Council, Minnesota DNR and Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development). It was subscribeu to by the 83TF in develop- ing a recommendation for 700 reliable car -trailer parking spaces on tho lake. This guideline was derived from a broader guideline of one beat per 10 acres of lake surface which has been used ;n water resources planning for some time. This original guideline is based on a variety of research tudies in the 1960s and early 1970s. NeedlEss to say, the actual "safe and surable" boating density depends a great deal on the kind of lake and tt -e of boating being done. The studies behind the original one boat per 10 o e guideline will not be summarized here. Suffice it to say that the current public access guide- lines of one parking space per 20 acres of water was derived by simply allocat- ing half of the density guideline to private access and half to public access. The adequacy of access can, therefore, be evaluated from two perspectives: 1. Adequacy of public boat access, and 2. Adequacy of overall boat density on the lake and the proportion of this density that is allocated to public and private accesses. With regard to Lake Minnetonka, these two it,ms can be addressed for the entire lake and each of its subzonr�_ 23 The inventor) ublic access sites shows there is inadequate public access t! Lake Minnetonka in general and particularly in zones 3 and 5. The question o adequate over .' boating density on the lake is not as easily answered. Vali and reliable research exists to show that at peak times, the boat density reaches approximately one boat per six and one-half acres (2,200 boats on a 14,000-acre lake). In several small, restricted parts of the lake, the dens' . reaches one boat per acre. In several large, open areas it is less than one boat per 30 acres. If one looks at the peak, the level of access resu;ting in this density is more than adequate overall and would benefit from more even dispersal. However, recreational facilities are seldom planned or regulated to handle the potential peak time. A better criterion might be average weekend .day peak. The data is nut as clear for average peak as it is for potential peak. The reason is that there is only one study that addresses other than potential peak use --the 1984 DNR (Biocentrics) study. Earlier DNR creel census data does not provide this measure and is generally out of date, given the growth in boating since 1975. Annual data collected through 1982 by the LMCD is specifically aimed at highest peak use once a season. A- discussed previously, the 1984 DNR study is a valid approach which yields reasonable results when compared to other studies that collect the same kind of data. The "typical" weekend day peak density of about one boat per eight acres and the approximately 25 percent of this peak use coming from public accesses, indicate that overall lake access may be adequate but that public access may be inadequate. However, repetition is needed to provide reliable estimates of both these variables, neither of which has been addressed by other studies. Issue 3--Non-Local Funding for Land -Related Development The only use information applicable here is visitor origin. There is valid and reliable data available on where people come from to use the public accesses on Lake Minnetonka. This information could be used to address questions of non - local share of funding for boat launches and shore access area. While exact calculations have not been made, it would seem that about 25 to 30 percent of public access users come from the communities surrounding Lake Minnetonka. It should be remembered that access visitor origin may not be the only criterion to use for determining benefits received from public access. Issue 4--Non-local Funding for On -Lake Costs of Public Access, e.g., Public Safety and Law Enforcement Once again, visitor origin information, as a measure of who benefits from these operational costs, could help in developing an approach to non -local funding. The data is not as reliable here. As discussed in issue A, the amount of use from commercial and riparian accesses hr.s been addressetJ b,! only one study. There is also the question of whether all the commercial end riparian access should be seen as a benefit to the local communities arld their residents. In any case, the share of local benefit from on -lake operational activities would probably be higher than the share of Benefits from on -land, access -related activities. Issue 5--intergovernmental Coordination Use research has little to offer on this issue. Indeed, this issue may have more effect on the conduct of valid, reliable research studies than vice -versa. 24 Issue 6--Municipal Policies Which Relate to Lake Use and Development clo the Lake There is valid and reliable data on the number of boats stored on the shores of Lake Minnetonka, by boat type (runabout, cruiser, sailboat, etc.) and source of boat (commercial, multiple residential, other residential). This data has been collected by the LMCD for several years. The number of boats stored on the lake has dropped about 15 percent over the last 10 years. However, L`,e number of boats stored at commercial and multiple residential sites has increased by about 15 and. 25 percent, respectively. To the extent that municipal policies can control storage, the data speaks to how well this is being done. Issue ]--Commercial Access to Lake Minnetonka Comments on issues 1 and 6 are applicable here. Commercial access has increased according to data provided by the LMCD. The proportion of use that comes from commercial accesses at peak on a typical weekend day approaches 50 percent, according to the 1984 DNR study. Data from the 1983 task force report indicates that about 35 percent of the potential "boats on the water" were com- mercial access boats in 1982 (pp. 12 and 45 of the report show 2,966 commercial craft and of a total of 8,622 public access pLrking spots and private boats stored on the lake). Transient boats launched at private marinas would raise this percentage somewhat. However, the number of unanswered questions and a gap of 15 percent between the only two app'icdble data sources indicates that more study is needed. A related issue --Public information,/education/relations about use on Lake Minnetonka There is some research that shows the kinds of pudic infc-mation and education that needs to be done. Water patrol activity data shows the hct spots needing some kind of public education concerning rules for surface use. Valid and reliable data exists on perception of crowding and on areas that are crowded. Public relations and adequate access could stets people to less crowded times and places. The 1984 DNR study contains some ;formation on boater opinion about alcohol use and potentiai surface use restrictions. Speed limas are the most commonly supported restrictions on use. Non-alcoholic beverages are seen as the appropriate drink for boat operators by the majority of people. The proportion of opinion in favor of both of the measures is greater for lakeshcre residents than for public access users. While the 1994 DNR ;nterviews need repetition, it would seem that these results provide a reasonable place to start in forming a public information/education program for use of Lake Minnetonka. Issue 8--Status of Research on Lake Minnetonka Use This section of the task force report deals entirely ..th this issue. Summaries of research have been given. All that remains is recommendations concerning the scope of research needed to support decisions on to lake use issues. Recommendations for Additional Research 1. There should be expended use monitoring, especially for peaks and length of peaks. There seems to be some opinion and data that suggest level or declining peak use. This needs subsIantiation. 25 2. There should also be some or;gin-destination work done on boaters. Where they put in and where they go on the lake would help in locating future access. This is relatively eas.r to do. but it requires interviews of users at all access types. 3. Data on potential increases in all types of access is needed. This means monitoring of shoreline development, local plans for this kind of develop- ment and plans for undeveloped land in what might be called the "service area" of Lake Minnetonl, . Methods and data exist to gauge changes in public access use, but similar systematic data is not available for other types of access. Increased development in communities surrounding Lake Minnetonka will probably put pressure on surface use of the lake by increas- ing demand for all types of access. This will be particularly important as the proportion of use arising from different kinds of access becomes more clear. 4. The last research need is all inclusive. A systematic research program is needed on Lake Minnetcnka. Every potential action implemented on the lake to correct problems will needed complete evaluation --it's simply that kind of environment. A cooperative, ;f*ntly funded, jointly designed research program is needed. No one agency can justify the budget needed to proceed on its own. In addition, the variety of interests served by lake Minnetonka make it difficult for any one agency to achieve the credibility needed here. SA3889/PNOPNI 26 F; j�E� lyat k":FfING To: !Mayor Butler Orono Council Members From: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato Date: March 20, 1985 Subject: City Facilities Assessments Attachments A. Current Facilities Assessment B. Anticipated Organizational Development Scenario C. Project Budgetary lnformation Dated 2-86 D. Facilities Goal And Objectives E. Alternate Facilities Locations F. Sample Timetable Alternative Facilities Consideration G. 1980 Alternatives For Existing Facilities INTRODUCTION The present city facilities began with the constrution of the current City Counci: Chambers as a town hall in approximately 1901. This was a replacement building for a previ-ous town hall on the site. Prior to 1950 the city constructed the garages behind the Council Chambers together with acquisition of the house and garage adjacent to the Chambers and the lumber shed which was previously used by Streeter. Industries. In 1969 the City acquired the golf course together with the water plant that same year. The current administrative facility ryas acquired in 1974, moving from the house on Crystal. The garage on the water plant site for storage of utility vehicles was constructed in 1978. In 1982 the Police department was relocate) from the house on Crystal its; current location in Fong Lake. While parts of the City facilities represent a better situation than the City has had in the past, a number of the facilities are rapidly approching the need for substantial repair, if such is possible. Each of the buildings is deficient in numerous ways from our codes s noted in attachment A. ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT In light of the fact that significant expenditures need to he made in the facilities over the next five years it is appropriate that the City review its needs for the next 15 to 20 years. The reason this time frame is selected is its anticipated that Orono should be close to full development under the current zoning by 2005. City Facilities Assessments March 20, 1986 Page 2 of 2 Attachment B represents staff's best efforts to determine the development of the organizati iwithin that time period. This is broken down into a.) the present st ff level, b.) the expected scenario of development and c.) with possibilities that may altar the expected scenario. These City Facilities Assessment scenarios are an attempt to translated the development into numbers of people. (These are extremely rough at this point.) The reason for the translation into people is to be able to develop an estimate on the amount of space needed in a facility. As you will note the development contains the alternatives of both growth in staff size and the with possibility of contracting out those services in selective areas. The development is in part based on attachment C. That is the updated version of information given to the Council back in January which was originally develop for budgetary information purposes. ISSUES RELATED TO FACILITIES, In addition to the issues addressed in the goals and objectives in attachment D, the issues of significant are as follows: A. Organizational Development - The physical seperation creates numerous problems for an organization as small as the city. This increases having to make trips back in forth on a routine basis particularly between the Police Department and the City Hall. This not only expends energy and employee time, but also severely limits the ability to share appropriate resources among the departments. Additionally significant problems occur when the separated department feels that they are an independent group and not part of the overall organization. B. Convnnience Of Location - It is strongly felt that any location should be cent ally located in the community. One advantage to the current site is that it is not to far off "center." There are hc- aver other sites that would more closely approximate both the geographical and population centers of the community. C. Facilities Limitation To Productivity - As you are aware there is a significant link between an organization' productivity and the extent to which facilities will limit the productivity possibilities. This obviously increases the ongoing cost of city business. As -r example the City has had to stay with short wheel based trucks which ' of allowed the City to attain the productivity or flexibility which coL_d be achieved with even slightly larger wheeled based trucks. The shorter wheel base is usedin large part because of the garages cannot accommodate anything bigger. Other restrictions that inhibit productivity in addition to the separation of sites and the problem of less productive equipment, include personel having to spend considerably amount of time working around the impediments present in the current facilities. These include working on equipment (1 maybe 2 at a time), having to lay in water or ice because of the lack of drains, having to "jockey" equipment around in order to repair or maintain the equipment. From an office standpoint, the current arrangement presents impediments to the management and technical people as they are interrupted on a rot,tine basis by the public. They are reluctant City Facilities Assessments March 20, 1986 Page 3 of 5 to close their doors however because of the need to ensure the coverage under the present physical arrangement. D. Community Leadership - Appropriately the City should reflect its philosopy of a low governmental posture through its facilities. It appears however contradictary that the City would place requirements on other persons in the City through its zoning, building and other codes when the City itself although dealing with existing facilities, provides little leadership in compliance with its own codes. While attachment A does list some of the significant def.iciences ones, the list is a summary of over 20 pages of on the existing buildings. F. Ability to Provide Service - Because of the condition of some of the structures and their susceptibility to vandalism and fire the City stands a good chance that of having significant part of it's street maintenance/vehicle fleet destroyed in a fire. while this maybe covered in part by insurance and replacements can eventually be gotten, the City could be severely hampered in its maintenance efforts particularily for snow removal if it occurs in the fall or winter. Options The primary options are as follows. (Other options Maybe combinations of the major ones.) 1. No action- This option is to do nothing significant to fix up the current facilities. we have not attached any dollar amounts to repair or bring up to code complaince as at this point as it would entail outside expenditures and represents only part of the issue. It is strorgl.y felt however that something significant will need to be done with the public works facility in the next 5 years. 2. Construction and Relocation of Some of the Facilities - Construction of public works facility would prabablt mean relocation to —a different site. Such a move would allow for some rehabilitation and consolidation of the administration and police on the present site but would necessitate not only separating Public works from the rest of the City but also construction of some new facilities on the current site in Crystal Bay. 3. Construction/Relocation of All Facilities- This option would result in selection of one site to loc'at.ed all the, major city facitities except utility, liquor and golf. This would entail construction of perhaps one and -t most two buildings to accommodate these major functions. Financing While some rehabilitation could be done within the annual budget through a tax increase, the following represent general means to finance a significant new facility: City Facilities Assessments March 20, 1986 Page 4 of 5 1. Bonding- The general means of developing alternative facilities is through the sale of general obligation bonds. These would be no different then the special assessment bonds that have been sold in the past. They would generally however have a lesser interest rate together with the fact that they would require that it be submitted to the electorate in order for such bonds to be issued. Participation by other organizations such as other communities, Post Office, Library etc, in a joint. development may raise some questions under current. the Grahm-Rudman Bill as to the tax exempt status of the bolds. 2. Lease -Purchase- In recent years legislation has been passed to allow for a community to acquire capital equipment or buildings through the use of a lease -purchase arrangement with a private finance company. This is structured so as not to require a vote of the public. The City would however need to keep current with lease payments or it would lose the facility. At the end of the term of the lease the City can generally purchased the property for a dollar. Financing in this manner would be favorable in part due to the depreciation credits available. Further investigation of this option is needed ii the Council would be interested. (It maybe appropriate that the City buy the land on which the building is sited in order to firm up their interest in the lease.) 3. Sale of Property- The City does have a number of properties scattered through out. the City. It maybe appropriate to sell these in order to generate additional cash which could be used to finance a facility. Even without a new facility it would be pruden' to sell this property as the City has no interest in maintaining them. (Principal among these properties are 25 acres acquired for McCauley Road together with property in Crystal Bay the Cit; would care if it went to a different facility.) 4. Existing Cash Balance- The City could look at utilizing its rather substantial cash balance as a means to fund a facility on the front end and utilize tax anticapation certificates for Its cash flow until such as its restored through taxation. A variation maybe "Investing" the funds construction of a new facilities. RECOMMENDATION -- Based on the issues above it is staff's recommendation that Orono relocate all its facilities to one site separate from Crystal Bay with one maybe two buildings. This would be located in the community on any number of possible locations shown on attachment E. In addition to the City relocating its facilities the City could explore with abutting communities such as Spring Park anJ Minnetonka Beach and see if they have any interest in sharing facilities. This would still be convenient to their communities without the City of Orono ahsorhing them. Additionally it may be prudent to discuss with the post office the development of a consolidated postal facility. Other cooperative options may look at providing maintenance space for agencies such as Hennipen County Parks for servicing the Norenberg property and Rig Island should they ever attain it and LMCD for maintenance should I,MCD become involved in operations with facilities on the lake. City Facilities merits March 20, 1986 Page 5 of 5 While no firm cost figures for space have been developed or an approximate cost f-)r a financing recommendation, the staff brings this issue to the Council for discussion to identify issues related to exploring alternate facilities. Whatever the cost today it would probably be done at a much cheaper price toda} then in 20 years. This is not only because of construction costs but also because the increase in cost and decrease in the availability of alternate sites that would not be faced with conflicting uses. Attachment F is a tentative time table indicating the events that may need to take place in order to go from the current facilities to a new facility. Attachment G represents designs of alternative facilities done in 1980 on the present Crystal Bay site. They do not all address significant revamping of the Public Works facility. Proposed motion: Move _ 2ND _ That the City Council accept the assessment report for discussion at its April 28, 1986 meeting. Ayes , Nays C rrr cr WOOD ClUbWj#r FACILIP? INVEN"?Y "uil4ing flame Address Si;'.9 Sir Ft 14nd Area Condition of Structure Code Compliance (Major) Comments 1. City Nall 1335 S. 3rwn 1209x2s 14,5N -Building not designed to euildiirg -No conference sparer 2,400 sl ft carry load -Stairs undersize/cxanstitute -No privacy Acquired 1974 hazard -crawpsd offices -W handicap both roumsiA4':=,•-s -Aechnical/ggt people 2nd floor continually have work -ventilation poor interrupted by public traffic -Structural rtemt*rs undersized/ -poor atorage facilities not proper for use MD LMUI %reek rose -Exits often blocked -Hater apply/Looks suspiciaas improper -City usage -Inadequate fire seW ration -ConElict with residential througliout area -Exposed wiring'Iraiequate -Poor heating control outlets -No storage vault -Nark: cap access -File drawer usageitratfic caonf lict -Dangerous steps Zanina -Pedestriins step right out - Undersized lot an to street - puor sight - Inadequate setbacks - lines probably set within -.W; receptiorvwaitlrxg area Prospect/Brown right -of- _:;cy-asicxial crater leaks way - Inadequate parking - Pa:kiny separated by street 2. A.iblic Works- 1305 S Brown Rd 6,785 39,400 -Structural members rotting Bu'ldi 'Lumbe-;arl Shed' sq ft in selecteJ areas low gra3r✓rottintig -Massing exterior boards -Required to have oonc•ete; Acquired prior -Structural posts - sub;ect aspralt floor-flarwLaLle to 1950 to equipment abuse materials trap -Foundation decaying -Rafters undersized for sipen -Roof leaks -Occupancy required to be - ross ties dasaged sprinklered (+348e) Larger than permitted .good structure under State Bldg. Code (5109) t Zoning (-Slibetmmdard lot (87,129 required', -In right-of-wiy Crystal (1.51) t /Brawn (.5') -Inadequate setbacks -Commercial/Light Industrial use .n :sense residential -Molt: use site -Backout of front of buildiry onto Brain iload -Minor fire axild raise loss of building and all stored records and equipment -Inadequate material storages 'iar-dung area -rassengEr car/heavy equipment traffic oonfiict -Bldg blocks Crystal/Brawn sight distance -Insuff7cient City Vehicle storage -lrwdequate heated work space - Expensive to teat -Inadyuate lighting -Nat. built as raL.terear �e f i i tv :ui_•?irx tiarn Address 819g Sq Ft Lahti Area Cc:crditi xi of Structure Code Conj2liance (Ma;,__r) 4xraeerts ?. Puhlic Worr.s 1295 S. Breast 490 sq ft 6,250 Bldg -Light Industrial Traffic Off ice,'Garage sq ft -Aetuelinq close pcuxLmAty to Eanirnn w tiden structures (Carcrete block -lnadrguate setback bldg.) -Accessory structure without Acquired early primary (lots not lega11y 195J's combined) -Inadequate lot site 4. Putlic Works 1285 S. Brown 903 sq ft 6,'100 -Inadequate temporary Bldg —'lfftce/Light Industrial in Office• 1st floor sq ft structcral columns -Inadequate ventilation residential -Seca.d floor unusal•le -Inadequate fire separ - n:iluired early structurally unscand furnace 1950's -Inadequate stairs -Exposed electrical; Inadequate outlets -IrtadeLTiate septic syste•Zan -�na quaff: lot s,.ze -?nadequato setbacks 5. P�'.,1:- Nbrks 1281 S. &r.�an 1,200 - 6,752 BI -Improper exhaust ventilation -Light Industria''; scha-ical -Inadequate safe emplcryee Garage ,q ft sq ft protection - weWint;,'gcinding etc. Ca.strvcted by -Inacitcp:ate lighting • .or to City prior —� -L-:ddequate IDt • - ze -Inadequate electrical -Inadequate 1950 -Inadequate sett,ack capacity 63. Council Chambers 1275 S. Brown 760 aq ft 1,090 -Rear landing - poor Bing -No—bathrooms -public assembly (max 50 per code) sq ft conditton -Inadequatw• lc_ size -�L leak age Built 1904 -No land ic. r*r k tng gY loss ('card surfjoe required) -Inadequate space zaYout. -Inadequate exiting -Inadequate ventilation seating -Difficult tc use as polling place Zuni _I ate side setback -Inadegwte lot size 1233 sq ft (same lot -coundation crumbling Bldg -Light Irdustrial,,T-teriur f.Brawnb. pW's Garage 1279 S. Brawn as Council -Inadequate exits cucY9eni'Acetylc»e storage -Insulation destroyed di( water Cornstructed b'r Chambers) -improper f/amoatle liquids stora9�• -Roof leaks (e years) City prior to -Improper fire separati-n -Need to wear rail gear in 1950 -Inadequate ventilation rain/snow melt (repaired 2 years age) Zany -inadequate setbacks 'ui11115 Nanne Address Jg Sq Ft [and Area Ccwvlition of Structure Cade Compliance (Ma]or) ,,verall Public Works Comments B1rq` -No harndi cep access Zoni -I f lc :s combine -Inadequate size -Too many structures (primary/accessary) on 1,it -Code does rot allow mix : ng ceimerciall' industrial uses on same lot '. Police Station 440 willow Dr Bldg long Lake -Inadequate bathroom facility :tenter] 1382 -?Jc handicap access Zoning Long Lake 3. stater Plant 2345 Blaine Ave - Garage - Treatment Facility - water Tower Liquor Store 1421 Shoreline Dr Rented 1965 -Inadequate,tnsafe vehic�e storage -Space restricts acquisitiixm of appropriate size equipment -Inadequate heated Work apa'e -Expensive to heat -(4 spaces -Vulnerabu1. y to fire.' vandalism -Dis)ointed spacers/work groups -ID wash sinks/Bct water shoPs -Floor drain two 55 gal;an drums fill up/water-ice 1-2' in shops -Severly inadequate mauntenence:'repair space (l at a time:? restricts acquisition of larger more adequate equipment -Split eaterial storage wastes time (sewer plant) -Inadequate garage widthflength -Salt/S&,,i mixing in parki.g lot -Lease expires 1/i/A-is ->: uarated fray rest of or•;anization - causes 'communication problems' -Inadequate holding faculty (hardcutfs;'eye'uolt in wall;'or. chair) -Inadequate office apucr -Inadequate parking -Need for heated vehicle storage to licit officer/ vehicle downtime -;;adequate lockericlang:ng facilities -Substantial peat lass due to no outside 'vestibule' -L_ght Industrial in residential -Concerns regarding chlctinization -Rented facility -I naddeq uate floor space -Inadequate office area 1'.inc !ame Address B.1_�S3 Ft Land Area Condition of Structure 114. Pest Office 1355 S. 3rown 800 sq ft 15,200 sq ft 11. Vaca:t L-)t Adjacent to i31200 N!A Brown Rd sq ft ' 2. Sewer Plant 1j. Golf Course logo old (Bldgs awned by Crystal Bay Metro waste) Road South .,65 Orono House 4_i Acres Orchard Road 14200 sc1 ft Not bbaluated rxip CMl i ance (Major) Bldg Zon i rig -Triadequate parking -Parking FCW Bldg Zoning Bldg Zoning =Lrnbuildable lot!publ,*.c road frontage -Metro Waste/No public road frontage -inadequate dry buildable CcXments -lndaiequate tir invent j 6ta. k -:radec4uate pmrkrng -Inadequate access -Inadequate bsthrcxn - .ased for anventnry -Needs new furnace/Ins"Itior: (S4W."monta) -Put ctulee with Par'K X—diostlon F -xb -Balance of 'Park' m tuts associated with bld9s 1 i 9 -No direct off street parking solely for park. on street p&riLmj severely restr� -+ed t1y narr-.a.• stxwt Materials storage are., 4 l l A�cinistratim (I-icluling Information and referral - plus c•rgani rational marketing) Fin3ru Assessin- ,Maanage-rnt Information CM(W�D SM WIC6 1pm rnal EXPECM YMR 23M • C'JRRI'Wr STAFF F"XPFX—"FZ) FT PT SC'EWTO i'S Fr I PT SCENARIO Admin (1) Recorder (1/2) Increasing Recorder to Ft Mgr ;i) Clerk (1) Addition of Receptionist/ Clerk (1) Deputy Clerk (1/3) Switchboard operator Reecorder (1) Clerk (.5) Clerk Switchboard/ Operator (1) Contract Legal (FTE-.4) Contract Legal (FTL'=.4) Director (1) Anticipate Increased Director (1) Deputy Treas/Clerk (2/3) Dommid for accounting Deputy Treas (1) Account Clerk (1) information! Some Axr, it Clerk c1) increame in utility accounts - billings, (39%) Bill iri --cessing Contract - Private Contract - Private (Make office space (FTF. a 1) rPM - 1) available) Joint Powers/WGIS Joint P wersiLOGIS nLhlic Works 1. Building Maintenance Contract work If in one complex - City Hall (FTE-.3) either contract or - Police ME-.2) hire one ixrsan - PW's - Street Dept. Personnc i '. ;vininistration Public Works May need tc add Coordinator (1) selected clerical assistant (Climate controlled space for small in house computer) Coordinator (1) &3 nario(:5) PC65IBLE VS FT / PT Should significant increase in available municipal utilities may :ncrease by 30% Should a significant shift Clerk (.5) to local non -tax revenue sources occur, maybe increase collection needs Provide Financial/ Clerk (.,) Accounting services for other oon unities 0 L?FFF:"r" :,TAFF EXPECIT3) POSSIBLE Qt2Ttx?T^ SERVICES FT i Pr StFlRFI0 VS rr / PT SCESIAFJO i VS PI / PT 3. Engineering Contract service (F':z'=.2) Antiripate no significant Contract servi-e dem;xi for servi m not funded by developwnt fees May need filing/work space d. Street Maintenance/ Park Maintenance 5. Street Overla% Rebuilding 6. _t;lities Foreman (1) Anticipate mLAerate Foreman (1) RM (1) increase in Street/ HED (1) LEO P) mileage for public LED (5) LED (1-2) Street Maintenance maintenance Potential for combination with utility crew. Anticipate more 'productive' machinery Contract ',:Lln t r ]c t Foremen (1) Possible Combination with Foreman (1) Utility Streets. Modest increase Utility Maintenance (2) in sewer/water Maintenenace (3) a) Around service fringes/ currently zoned for util;ties (509 connections) b) Stubbs Bay (53 connections) c) Hwy 12 -Shift of County to Wica 1 Roads + Im (I - S. Brown Road (1.8) - Bayside (2.9) - Old Crystal Bay/84 (.9i itnkawa (1.7) vacth Arm Drive (1.9) ase in City done -Contract service to abutting communities Minnetonka Beach Spring Park Long Lake Maple Plain Tonka Bay -Increased park weiot._raru.t due to increased parK use -Activity in parks -Significant push by LtD (1) private road associations (Maintenance cxpend:ture to either up markedly;. a) Contract with City for selected ma in tenctnce b) Convert from private to public. -"especially in single 'amily areas (t of private miles ) -Significant increase in utility extension a) Water - Balance of Utility Maintenance (l; COMM .:), - Hydrants only - Service b) Sewer - Significant Utility Maintenance (2) balance of eomnini t y (790 connections) - Contract service with Utility Maintenance ii) ^_:!RR!N Si:1FF F;XPFX`!tI) PCbSIBix C'.TRFLy %r SF7VIM FT / PT SC'E?i)► TO --^--- 1'S FT / PT SLID"10 t's' Pr / PT �569 axnnections) Minnetonka Beach Vehicle Maintenance Contract to private Police Servic^ Oro no;'Cont:bct ',ong Lake Spring Park Dnergency Preparedness Fire Servi^_,! Chief (1) Asst. Chief (1) Sgt (1) Patrol (6) Secretary (1) Secretary (1/4) Reserves (15) Patrol (3) Patrol (4) Contract Long Lake Mound Maple Plain Wayzata If cost effective - Private contract on Space required City leased space - City sechanic/Shop Mechanic (1) Increase in population Chief (1) of 361 will probably Asst. Chief (2) require addition 1-2 personnel together with more senior force Patrol (8) or Investigator G.) Patrol (7) Secretary (1) Increase viability of Secretary (.50) Reserve Program Reserve (30) Anticipate the selected Patrol (3) patrol for Spring Park Patrol (1) to decrease No significant change Space - Conference ram expected convertible to i]aergency Operating Center Possible construction of snail satellite station in Navarre area. May be joint project with either Mound at Lanq Lake Fire. Possible contract extension to lbnka Say ( if Long Lake, Minnetonka Beach and Spring Park (.5-1) -If lose all contracts :raef (1) doubt if any zigniticant Asst. Chief (2) decrease in numbers i;. Patrol (6-7) fact possible increase Secretary (1) from 4-19 full! time Fveserves (20) officers -If specific assigned Lhref (1) patrols reduced Asst. Chief (2) basic contract Patrol (il-12) or may increase oy (3-4; Patrol (19-11; over year 2aa;s lnvtstigator (1) Secretary (1) :iecrete-v r-=' Reserves (38) -Addition of contra;_ts Petrol (4-5) - Wayzata - Other -'North Lake:' Fire" -Possible 'B:ey :)ut" Volunteers (49-45) of Long Lake Fire (or joint prayers) as Qsono pays Boa of Clerical (.25) budget. Particularly if satelite station (contracts to Tonka Bay, Minnetonka Beach, Spring Park (.5) C..T'?rL' r SERV I CF5 uispaccn service Community Development "Ianning,/Zoning Building Inspection Contract to Minnetonka Beach Spring Park Passible Services FT / PT "Contract' (no direct charge) Hennepin County B 6 Z Again (1) Asst. Zoning (1) �um,* r Intern (.25) Building Inspector (2) EXPEL i .:. SciXNR10 Contract Hennepin County POSSIBLE 1'S FT / P': SCE&AR:_0 i'S FT / PT Contract Minnetonka,'another suburb -Anticipate oontinued Dept head (1) demand for zoning thru 2000. Focus will go to Asst. Zoning (1) variances and zoning Part time Septic/ issues of developed Zoning (.5) property and away `ram subdivisi.-Jns -Septic inspections goes up by 40% -If significant shift A,Lt. Zoning J ) away from septic (-50t) Part time ;.�5� -If contract with A.:st. Zoning ;I) i.ang Lake, Minnetonka >,Ptic,'Zonning (1) Beach or Spring Park -Building activity Building Inspectors (2) -Contracts continues within - loss of Minnetonka Inspector (1) existing sewer capacit Beach Spring Park Inspector (.5i -Add i t ion of Long Lake + Inspector 1.25) (Funded by permit fees) Recreation Provided thru -If substantial change Contract or School Districts in public education, may Recreation - remguire City to fill in Supervisor (.5) a void Transprrtation MW -Possible services related to -Iocal/IntercommAnity transit by contract Building space (Post Office) -Provide space associated Rental/Associated service - Minnetonka Beach Services - Spring Park 4 1960 1961 IM . 29sI 19a4 198S 1906 19a7 /IM.1[CTlOt+1 19" 1989 1990 2000 Popp •flow 5•wroA IJSO .•-N_.-•_•NN..N._--N.•. N tlnaowtsd 2570 %340 ' 5100-5700 Total N J0 690S 7021 • 7359 7240 1 7310 7370 7440 7530 76C0 1900 Motto Cowell N20 W20 �� 1 -9S00 1000 7000 t mumtwof lower" 16S0 2506 1 roYaehOlds awowase" 261 Total Ise at i029 1950 t 12/611 l311 21•I 2371 2613 2676 2926 1 2566 3604 36" 36" 2766 f2SO Mat" crmastl 2l61 330 2462 � 2600 2700 t+Plalarmt/ htits�a armwsl3 f50 1 Too Too member of >0 51 31 62 K SO ( 60 60 6S SO 6S M/W as. Primary ad".1 Saw fit• Member rulawtlal 0 Value 30 30 02.0 3.606 30 6.619 62 SAM SS 10.666 S6 1 11.61 „ 0.0 39 9.0 66 0.0 69 9.6 sa if thtutwla � 1 6.6 9.V" a-/Cl'ms 1 0 l a 1 1 1 l 1 1 1/rt 0 9m1M 0.230 .150 .OiO .1761 .too .100 .200 .200 ►6nuta..1 .200 .200 Remodel/ s�aeltsoaa 0 alas 36 01.439 176 2.276 210 1.67 219 2" !76 1 2" aw 370 no !96 200/1'r IMsllioaaf 1.70 6.397 3.6 1 2.S 2.9 2.1 2.0 2.9 3.0 a.aa•amowt/Taat .yeah tit built is 1963. its as 1905 .meal 1 harlot almw - 0272.29 306.67 30.90 3S7.9 309.13 385.101 ln.46 600.16 622.06 423.90 S63.90 (h/ll/aaal 1 fart 4000130ta0 tar tat1at16a) Aeseesel a1A Velvet 70.0 79.7 90.1 93.2 102.1 100.Sj .103.0 106.4 IM.72 113.03 1".6 etN 0 ' 9 C1 0 Chaa*m 1.291 170 1.692 1.533 2.611 1.7s6 1.922 2.196 1 Calculative 6 20M 16.6 2.7 3.1 9.1 - 9.3 16.3 Actual 0 1.763 1 Schema 2.262 22.St 11.399 1.606 2.632 1.766 1.940 3.196 I 17.6 .S 16.0 9.6 6.6 13.2 Covermlcr Cso,� ' 6 Increase to households astlaata6 Mr 1.01 1.3 1.4 ' Growth IRlwarp 2.0 2'0 2.3 1.9 I 1.6 1.6 1.6 Local Consumer Pttow In6sa III 1.6 1.6 ICPI1 16.St 2.61 2.2a I.Ot 6.00 5.00 am gamic* contrasts _ total (CPI a 6b. Orowo crwrth ' a ham, C e"re s Growth) 121 15.69 6.00 6.10 6.0% 9.30 10.7t 1 gall Cumulative aro.tb 6.a• lags east S.1r Tax Increase 9.9 I.SNtI C1mslatlro Growth 10.6 6.9 10.S 11.7 -4.3 6.6 h ! • Crorth witbort �bwtraot• 32686.2 COALS/OBJECTIVES FOR ALTERNATE CITY FACILITIES - One Compound - Convenience - Compatibility - Productivity - Resource sharing - Turn Key Construction - Expandibility - Size of staff/contractor's staff - Services/Equipment - Other agencies/sharing - Flexibility - Within building(s) provide for significant rearrangement potential - Convenience/Accessibility - Public - Service to community/productivity (abutting 9 tom road) - handicapped - Compatible/non-intrusive to surrounding land use __ Utilities Sewer - strongly desired City water - preferred not essential �-1i1*it:fi�lc n� N T' l,[,,if C. , f 326SF, . 2 POSSIBLE '►' 4ETABLE FOR FACILITIES CHANGE - S lection of design op- -)n f %'36 - Development - Approximate cost estimates 7/86 - Determine appropriate financing 8/86 - 'Arect site selection (option?) 10/86 (- Determine potential tenants) - I£ needed s,ibmit to voters, 11/86 if not submit to public hearing If a go - Acquire site 2/87 - Seek additional shared tenants commitment 2/87 - Design facility 3/87 - Aid project 5/87 - Arrangf- financing r/87 - Aw,.rd prvj.--: 6/87 - Complete 7/88 - Transfer rac;'ity 7/88 OR A✓s. uoRT+! - ---- i ( I ----.. —�-- o I � saw Mu Iv 4>0.4 o ExPST 110C CG3RVARY� Igeio � � L ♦woo, 10 PAWCT.I-S J��.pIw.1GS l., exYITAL mAV Qi I��H'r/!M� �M .�itlii�J� Q� rLlwrw V �. iJQiIC M/dKKs t. ,� sTO.tAG� � �, tOL/Ci GAR.IGi � S. POLI<£ G1�J�/CE r+a44r yob/c udr�bs � �, PUB�Ic wanks SMD� V 9: Pv,BLIC kAU.�KS 6i12EGE i B. COuwclt l,�.l�►6ERS FUSLIC WCAP9 STORAGE i kno""I 4*.. " A e. 41 i OR A✓E. jl W l; M/ R jzuAm cv&)G o 1 ! /'S"IT 10%* - e►1G aoocs � � 1� pow mimmi6 WT © Awl '8Ro i Q' 4TE2A VATE N_ e.. 1, /OLIC& Ortpr- ADO✓Et /ir k� �/ Aff&ffMob P4". Ata/[s 1b LLaG • s Aw"c &wtirr lee,ePAVA7Av Aw*wf m �IOwiA,�sTlAr�a�, /. POLICE acir. �. AD.N/N/STAVAT/oAJ 3• Pv6�ic waRKS EQap! S:�irrAG[ I. Po[/!E 6A17AGE � �ttEtrArt�,, (�scx 4,btrs %. Po6L/C k10�PKS SJkJp 9. Pv�St�c &CWWI< ' G.K./BE �t, �'ocwf/L CN�ISEA�S A►O C11A�k4LS lmo r7 + i Aa-_ z If WeIrrs f j I - - - -- J a ?R A ✓E. Q WTERIcz REMOCEUK)C-- Parri-nw5 - C-Ha PMRS i ua'� PAtJUMG LOOT � �, A+R WT+tY -Rt ei1! -Q�►tFJOWiQE 10 AULOt ►�KRioit V4CATE STRAET ' f RFVKE PKIS. O Ty Ll [TERN4 TE Alo• /!7L/CE pdrr 41CHC1 iz' ~C Ap0/7t0v A, E Oat/ AUua✓/f%flra.E dtoec ra CA4101-/0Arf At! 4pA41t•. r;sm*rjwS j� /ocicE vcr,-, Q 2. APA#/v/fr44T/ow .i � /t�6tic ervo2�cs L�v�A+. SToblk,E QI fbt/CE arLttGE �" s �uQLIC ur�`•tift OfJrlf� (� /cPf..✓ �rJ CiF.«� �. CawC/L CNI�/6�QS ' 9. Ri6u� wartt� SrGilAGE I i 1 i i 1 lot 2 Tcn.t'M _ #IAVV�CAPPLO A TER �� (sec ►rest t) d _ SOFT ti �i�lSoa .4✓c. � M4r•K l rw,t[ i ;v�J Z •ir+� �r U �` i � r I O 4 � N h V pnnu45 c ZZ cs • • sw •wrre ..wet Tw A y mcm~l • Aw wews sssr+rw iwri fr..u. •Lelas M . d6. 4 a ntwei driR,tic C♦ItMtp�t !• ti7Y ,+4c t Oueos KN oco ..wlv-AItwF �tJKOrAtyS ♦ is« L&M AAWW Or eArWTAL Art. D&b,%Lot ►AQIW6cAp4y t LWJCNOtw:+ PA2,c WIL-D*k* GAM it aaRTM Cwt4uca JtLAVOV EFrKt9k mat-- r li7 • .nu �cfv�aa� �wc .w,�u ►.AM•► Teat Na si►re ev w.L cw.46=s .as & p as A voce .ew , 601' l TO wKTIM4 (k-. I) nK.o is AW4 to MMW. WWL ...err., aft"m cat ACeIT.,.; 4" I �b WT 84 %Fog AT rM .. -a TWW tts,o&w7/A[ ter lick TO: Mayor and City Council �, '�?`' 1 APR 14 i?86 FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato �, DATE: March 24, 1986 X of okukv SUBJ: Navarre Re(' ielopment Attached is the tentative work plan to undertake the issues regarding Navarre Redevelopment. In addition to having prepared a property inventory for two different sized districts for rede- velopment in the Navarre area, the staff has been reviewing the applicable statutes regarding implementing a housing and Rede- velopment. Authority, tax increment, financing, etc. As noted, the extent to which anything can be done may be effected by Gramm-Rudman not only as it relates t­ the taxability of any bonds issued for such redevelopment but also potential impacts of highway funds etc. as to the County 15 upgrade. D ing the April - May time frame, it is anticipated the meetings will be set up for preliminary discussions with the business people in order to develop the level of interest and the directions the people directly involved might be interested in taking. This item wi l l be on the Apri 1. 28th agenda. Proposed Motion - Moved by __, seconded by , that. the City Council accept the information from the Administrator regarding Navarre Redevelopment and that the issue be discussed at the April 28, 1986 Council meeting. Ayes , Nays 22786.3 NKVAJM P30JWT MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST WEEK \CPTVITY OF 3 10 17 24 31 7 14 21 28 5 12 19 26 2 9 16 23 39 7 1t 21 28 3 11 18 26 1. Property Inventory Complete Inventory and Analysis expanded of bldgs to area determine - needs 2. Determination of HRA available tool feasibility Port Authority availability Status of Tax Exempt Financing in Development (TI/Revenue) 3. Determine redevelopment Set Initial Goals/ Scenario Plan project interest Ntg Ntg/ Obi. Financing Direction Business 4. Plan Refinement 5. Financial Costs 6. Plan Implementation Develop estimates of costs - Pre Plan - Plan Development Planner Review, Comment - Project Development Oft"i I ETING A. P R 14 19 06 TO: Mayor and City Council � 4� ��Y� �� �1K� FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato A� NO DATE: March 24, 1986 SUBJ: Administrator's 1986/87 Goal Setting & Performance Evaluation Attached are three documents 1. Goal Setting status for 85/86 as of the end of March 2'8, 1986. 2. Proposed Goals for 86/87 Goal Setting. 3. Performance Evaluation of the Administrator by the indi- vidual Council members. During the period between April 14th and April 28t.h, I will set up individual meetings with each of you to review all three documents, in particular to get your concerns as they relate to the 86/87 goal setting. At that time, if you have any questions regarding the evaluation form, they can be discussed or if you want to pass that on to me at that time it would be appropriate. At the Apri 1 28th meeting, it is my desire to adopt the 86/87 goals together with placing on the agenda for Council discussion the Administrator's first year performance. Proposed Motion - Moved by _, seconded by _ the Council accept the various documents from the Administrator and that the 1986/87 Goal Setting together with Council discussion of the Administrator's first year pe: formance be placed on the agenda. Ayes Nays __ P.S. Department heads have indicated their willingness to discuss with any of the Council members, issues related to the Admini- strator's performance. GOAL. �.. s:T"i :MC DRAT 7/1/65 mEVISED 7; 31/05 '-ITT OF UROW; AP►SOI/RD S/12/55 STATSS i/26/96 AID HARK E. HP.RNMARDSCR3 'T AUMISISTRAr"R 1-95 ro 6-30-96 AREA GOAL AREA OSJ ECTI VIL; DATER STATUS C?!tMUN1'rY D£VEI.r.PMERT MighWay 12 Corridor Initiate Study B.-1/85 6-15 commenced stat! .'rk Carry out Study as 9-:L-tis Rick off Outlined by Phase meeting 10/20 Phase complete 12'2 Commence Pnsse :. Complete Phase 6 5/16.66 3/31 Mork session: Phases 17-1v Redevelopment Develop Strategy 12i3lle5 :ratlat.e .Lady 11-E5 Initial DireCti—S to Council 1/li; •s Commence Navarre Study 5%_%B6 Currently doinq Navarre iaventory Phase I complete 3'10'"A Phase 11 4/15-86 Business msatinge thru Mestonka Chamber at: i::Jr N6 3 AREA GOAL AREA OBJECTIVES OATS STATOS Environmental Prote.Ction Crystal Day Project Complete 5/86 11-85 - 9,% pipe laid,'r,o;ect. 8Si complete Stubbs Bay C:�xxcence 18-85 Needs Asse Sent 11/8S reeds Assesseirat t., Cou••. ii 12i30 Delay-4 to 3/31 Lelay*d to 5/96 Project Feasibility 1/86 Consider Project 21,86 Com once Project 5; 86 need to delay intil federal tax Assess Project 9/86 leg.alation enacte3 Complete Project 11 86 1P ;ANILATIONAL DEVEL )PMENT Management Team Goal Setting Corpuf.ite Work Plan 8 85 :ssued 9-1-65 Completed initial 8-85 r>epartment Head Goa: Staff Development Setting ";5 Qays complete.! - Strategic Plan given to Council 1/27 186 York Plan developed 2_'15 Council Communications initiate one on one continue >n monthly! Meetings 5;65 atmon—siy basis t 1't6A GOA I. MWA ^R-: •,X:Z1T:')lSAI, N4NAGEM:14^ Personnel R.:lei Coapvnsacion Pion aluation states -r-EIPRIZ`: "AERATIONS Liquor Store Gulf Ccurse U9JMTYV S DATBS Start Aiviev Proposa:s 6 7:'85 Submit to council 8;85 intents Study 8:85 - Salaries - Benefits ;;ospar :tile Worth Study l l/85 Develope.i for all Employees 9r'85 Isplemente.f 12is5 Devr1OP Business Strategy Plan '/65 `tefflaP 7.c:siur Points 18/85 Dpve1:.F e.;ainess Stra•ety Plan 11i65 STAT" 9-•15 to Attorney To Council ii;lY/8S Approved I. /25: 85 Subvitted S-l-sl Appi.ved 9-28-aS 12'I1 Aws.t CW results Commenced Dept Mrada Evaluation lii 85 Tti Ali esFloy�rs t i5.'86 is -Ns Presently developing To Council 12/9/65 Council DISCussinn 1!li.e6 ueaults on track as 1 ,'1 SlB6 la-gs Developing general plan for all departments i/t6 Commence 501f C.oars7 Nor-. A AMLA GOAL Ann C!�KYJNiTY CIEVELOPM�.R" Rilhway 12 Cor:idor Na%arre Re.tevelnpment Envir nmontal Protection MAL tiYTT11k; C 7 TY (N ORoW , ARID MARK a. L< IMARDSCMt ::TY AOKI•15TRATt1R 5-1-66 TO 4- 4-67 Ofti WT I VMS _9W Complete Stidy 61,15.166 Develop/Adopt work program 7/36/66 to initiate any changes Complete rea"fired 12!3116i implementation Ten•ative goal,-ot eclavcs 7.136/96 l'la,ning Review 8r36i86 Adopt proir_t direction. 10.186 Mork on Cty 15 devel.:+i.men: 7/89 Stubbs Rat Needs acseasment 5/66 Project Feasibility 8/116 If Appropriate Protect consiieration 11/86 Protect brd 111166 Commence Pr: tact 4.'9' Assess Project Complete Protect crystal Bay Complete protect 7/96 . Complete appeals process 1Irb6 aRAFT 3; 28/66 STATUS ORt7AKitATIfiMAL DEVELOPMENT • Management Team Goal Settinq IFRVIC£ DSL1vrRY ii" `bAN RCS"JRC£., }t,:AMFTIN: Council final Setting Legislative Polley Business Strategy Plan.tiig Facilities Aasea went Compensation Corporate communication 1981 work p.an/staff 1966 staff development Strategic plan review Policy body orientation ,Now membe:si Devviop 1987 pro_ 1m Police Financial strat-9y Ga:f C.wr-e Building and toning Jtil.t iea Streets Aametsment to C�"}nctl Council direction Develop.'AdoFt Comparable Mort. Plan Commence imp;emer,teticn City Report Paper Cagle 'V 11.196 18-1t; 8r 6-8/86 1%d7 It'66 c. a0 2/86 6/66 7 'e6 8. 96 a'86 { �86 6/36 6; 66 8,166 6!86 S/86 CT'+Y ADMTHISTRATM SYALOATION r iay 1985 - April 1966 (Name Optional) 1PE91P0wLtrr'- HOT -HARACTE i * b MCS OBSERVED UNSATISFAC:Y)RY EKPrCTEV 1. COUNCIL -ADMINISTRATOR RELATIONSHIP A. General I . Res, .?ivene _o Council C. Ke ,•Ing Council informed significant issues 2. ADMINiSTRATOR - GOAu SETTING a. Establishing appropriate a b. Performance to ichieve 3. COMM—IT- VELAT=ONSHIPS A. nsiveness to public I . L'nderstan-ing of community uniqueness 1. ORGANIZATIONA,L LEADERSH.P a. Prov;ding appropriate or,a-.iaatiun direction b. Dev..Ioping subo►dinatee 7. Understanding of organisational operation d. Decisi,n sa..ing S. IN^FRORGAN:%NTIONAL COOPERATIJN a. Neighboring communities b. Other public entities , 6. TASK PERrur—,mc'r a. Council meeting j,re+entatt,3n/ds1've4:y t. AdRinistration of isation C. Labor contract repot ions I., Policy develop recommendatio' 2.1 Significant pol. ie r,andlin5 e. De+el.,).•ent and seeting of organizational yurls end objeCt. E. Development animation •'et changing no �• c'r 7. OTHERS (?lease list _t ; copow"'TaJ1 ASOV Y. EXPECTED OUTSTANDING akdlny cossents or thouy a.) as to iirectiOns you v like t,_ see either the organisation it <dministrator go It undert%te. J 'wR P^.. 'i _ 'k' ' �. + Y.. • t� P ' 1' !1 t . lr i... ... r. :l r: ! �r JV !". !2 COUNCIL MEETING TO: Mayor and City Council APR 1 i986 FROM: Mark. Bernhardson, City Administrato ' DATZ: March 24, 1986 CITY OF G W duBj: Special Events Summary Ordinance .Attached please find for y:u, consideration in passing the summary of the Special Events Ordinance for publication in the paper. Proposed Motion - Moved by , seconded by , to approve the attacheu summary ordnance for Publication of Ordinance No. 5.25. Ayes , Nays ORDINANCE NUMBER 22, SECOND SERIES SUMMARY APPROVED The Council hereby determines that the text of the summary of this ordinance marked "Official Summary of Ordinance `.,,mber 22, Second Series" and a copy of which is attached hereto, clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. The Council further determines that publication o; the title and such summary will clearly inform the public of the inte °' 7 effect of the ordinance. OFFICIAL SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 22, JE:COND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 5.25 SHOWS AND LARGE ASSEMBLIES AND 6.08 PARADES AND SPECIAL EVENTS Th_ following is the official summary of Ordinance Number 22, Second series approved b­ ie City Council of the City of Orono on March 10, 1986. The following is new language added to Section 6.08 Parades and Special Events and Section 5.25 Shows and Large Assemblies: Section 6.08 Parades and Special Events Suhd. 1. Definition. A. "Parade" means any movement of vehicles, persons or animals, or any combination thereof, which either moves together as a body so as to impede or affect the free and unobstructed flow of vehicular or pedestrian traffic, or which moves so that some part thereof is in violation of one or more traffic laws or regulations. B. "Special Event" means any marathon -un, block party, fishing contest, parachute jump, hot-air balloon event, carnival, or any other activity or event which in some way impedes or affects the Free and unobstructed flow of vehicular or pedestrain traffic, generates parking needs for more than 20 vehicles off site at any one time on resic:antial streets, not including a public access to Lake Mi.inetonka, or requires the postir;g of "No Parking" signs to maintain compliance with traffic laws and regulations. SulA. 2. Permit Required. A permit shall be obtained from the City by any person, corporation, or other entity who will t,e holding or sponsoring a parade or special event. Application for such permit shall be made to the City at least sixty (60) days in advance of the date on which the parade or special event is to occur Mess waived by the Council. The applicant shall fill out a form provided by the City, stating the sponsoring organization or individual, the route or location, the time or commencement, termination and the general composition. The application shall be executed by the individual applying therefore or the duly authorized agent or representative or the sponsoring organization. The permit requirements set forth in this section apply in addition to any licensing requairements set fn-th in Section 5.25 of this ordinance. K Subd. 3. Investigation. The City shall forthwith refer all applications for parades and special events to the Police Chief for the Chief's consideration. The Police Chief shall review each application within ten (10) days. If an application involve a State truck highway, the Police Chief shall make necessar-• arrangements with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety for an alternate route or whatever may be necessary. If the Police Chief finds that such a parade or event will not cause a hazard to persons or property, will cause no great inconvenience to the public, and if the Chief is able to make arrangements for necessary direction and control of traffic, the Chief shall sign the application and return the application to the City Clerk. If the Police Chief finds the parade or special event described in the application to be a hazard, a substantial inconvenience, or if the Chief is unable to make adequate arrangements for direction or control_ of traffic, the Chief shall return the same to the City Clerk with appropriate findings set forth in writing. Subd. 5. Unlawful Acts. C. It is unlawful for any person to enter into a nazage or special event without prior authorization from the person in charge of the event. Subd. 6. Removal of obstructions •.:)f. Traffic. In any case where vehicles or parking by an activity obstructs traffic, regardless of whether or not the activity required a permit, a Police Cfficer shall warn the property owner and/or the p— son in charge of the event, that the cars must be moved by a certain time. If the vehicles are not moved in accordance with the Officers request, the Officer nay ticket that person and all. the cars that constitute the traffic hazard. Vehicles that constitute a hazard may be to -wad at the owner's expense if so ordered by the Police Officer. Subd. -7. Exceptions. The following are not required to apply for permits (1) funeral processions, (2) a governmental agency acting with the scope of its functions, or (3) an occasional private party that is held on private residential Lots. Surd. 8. Payment of Expenses. The applicant shall pay all extraordinary expense incurred by the City for police and enforcement of this Section anti the City m;iy, as a pond i t ion of approval of the permit, require that the applicant deposit money with the City in a jum equal to the estimated expenses to be incurred by the City. M Section 5.25 Shows and Large Assemblies Subd. 1. License required. It is unlawful for any person to present any public show. movie, caravan, circus, carnival, theatrical or other performance or exhibition without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. It is also unlawful for any person to promote or sponsor a large assembly, for any purpose and to which the public is invited, without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. For the purpose of this Section, "large assembly" means a gathering, or projected gathering, of more than three hundred (300) persons at one time and at a single location. This shall apply in additon to any permitted requirement under Section 6.08 of this ordinance. A printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection by any person at the office of the City Clerk. This Ordinance becomes effective upon publication, the week of April 21, 1986. Adopted by the City Counci 1 of Orono on this 14th day of April, 1986, by a vote of ayes and nays. ATTEST: Mary C. Butler, Mayor Dorothy M. Hain, City Clerk i 4 MWIL WETI fG APR 141886 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark t�ernhardson, City Administrato �I�Y U���� DATE: March 2.4, 1986 SUBJ: Resignation - Steve Pearson Attached please find the resignation of Steve Pearson affective March 18, 1986. Mr. Pearson will become a police officer with Brooklyn Park after serving four years with the City of Orono. Mr. Pearson is an excellent offi-:er and we wish him the best of luck in the futui e. As you will note, Mr. Pearson is short two days of the required notice, but in this case it i.s waived. Proposed Motion - Moved by , seconded by , to accept the resignation of Steve Pearson as patrol office:. Ayes ___, Nays Prepare 3 copies NAME OF Ei tPLOYEE Steve Pearson Department Police Dept. VILLAGE OF ORONO, !Ii: JESOTA STATEMENT OF RESIGNATION Salary Rate $2496.72 (19 85 ra* e ) POSITION TITLE Police Offic r(Pat Full Time xxxx Part Time lman) Statement of Resignation: I request tha' this resignation be accepted b""the Village Council to become effective on p 8 a c i. ( u , w�ucis the las- day of actual service. I am requesting coop nsation for personal servict.- to the Village in the above indicated position for accrued annual leave for days. The reason for this resignation is as follows: I have accented a position with the Brooklyn Park Police Tent. I fully intend to fulfill any and Ill abliciations ;n the utyu-P which _are a result of my emvlovment w Da. s : March 6, 1986 1,—' ' j¢_ (Employee's Signature) Recommendation of Department [Joao: I would " would not ( ) re -Dire this employee. Tais position may not be refilled witil Date: (Department ea Certification of Accrued Leave: Payment for days accrued leave upon employee's termination on is hereby authorized. Date: (Village min s ra or COUNCIL MEETING APR 141986 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bern.nardson, City Administratort�'/1(6 ITY F R O ® DATE: March 24, 1986 SUBJ: Employment - Police Officer - Larry Tomcheck Based on his previous screening applications together with successful completion of the appropriate physical and psychological testing, the Council is requested to confirm the employment of Larry Tomcheck as a police officer. In aduance of this meeting, I have contacted three of you to get your verbal assent in this employment in order for the City to fill the needed vacancy. Proposed Motion - Moved by , seconded by , to confirm the employment of Larry Tomcheck as a Police Officer for the City of Orono effective April 10, 1986. Ayes , Nays 1 41086.2 t,P17 14 1986 TO: Mayor and City Council �!�' LA. FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: March 24, 1986 SUBJLCT: 3220 Watertown Road - Hazardous Building Proceedings Attached please find a letter from Carol Senn, the currer. owner of the property, outlining her concers regarding the property fix up period. Staff would recommend chat the hazardous building prr-,;eedings be held in abeyance as long as Ms. Senn proceeds with a reasonable schedule of fix up. Staff will be in contact with Hs. Senn to confirm that schedule of fix up. We will continue to monitor the act.Lvities on the property and report back to Council. Additionally, staff is currently investingating the two properties Ms. Senn has cited as being problematic and will follow up with any appropriate action. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by Y, seconded by , to direct staff to hold in abeyance hazardous building proceeJings if a reasonable fix up schedule can be maintained by currant owner. Ayes Nays t f htanch 15, 1 136-- Tom Jacobs' Feb.tuajLy 3 te.ttet Counc.ie. KC60t(Lt,i0►t N09 1939 Nayot h.laty C. Gutt t City o6 Oho no P.O. Box 66 Cty6tat Bay 'VI 55323 yeah b'a►roh 5uA I wish to tespc,.d to tabove subject concetn.ina my p.topehtu tocated at 3220 noad and l,.,itt 6tatt with Pane i o,4 .i:ic Re60.Pu!`.ion. 1. The buitd.ing6 ate vacant. I obtained a petmt,t and had .%.he bu.itd.ing3 ke4004eg .in 1993. A�te►c subta.irn.inn, window eamane dut.in; a 6t^ � �, 1 boarded .them up the same yeah. E-tectt.*c Z r .we.% is o �.in `he box io-h ieh .is t.nsi toe. the £atget bu.itd.ino. lhie tines st.i.tZ no atom the pole to 'tie building and I am not ateate. o►C any damaor_ .tio the Zane. 3. These .ib no seroet non .i6 their.e ant, need ,tor one at this t.i.me. 4. The gtouaez ate mair.fi 'ncd tenuCat.i.t y du,%ing the stowing season. This dnet ude6 mowing a£t open Qteas within a keazonabf distance Ftom .the toad and 1,tomntty temovt.nn atotm damage to ttees. 've aZAo had numetuua dead and dying titeeb temrved. These ate ,me areas I've putpoa e£y natutat. I'm ' i,o maintaining a _rratt ga)tden .in the back. I might add that ne.i.ghbo.as and o.*.';4rtne-',. Lve s.toi,ped Then coe've been working the..te a►,d t' '-.it a(fmita.t.ion at ho►#, nice ,the ptace iook6 and that they're Bead someone .is S.inatty taking cote o6 .it ante- so many yea.ta o� r,eptect. These peopee don't Keet .the ptopetty gooks abandoner!. 5. I believe toe have r rf.iFFetenee o� on.tn.i.on l,e.te 011 the de�inat.ion of detekiotatiot and d.if.ap.icfc.Non. Chat i consi'et an exarhp.te o6 a vio.ta.t.ion u4 cn► c6ota Sterre "u.i.tdinn rode/(lni4otm Bu.it4inn Code Section 203 w.e .the buttriinns an-f house nem^.ins .to- ente-f bet:,'een ? 2 5 and 4 0 5 South rtd Ctrs tat ;arr Road. Encto6ed is rt o4 my ptoilehty taFen .in Febtuat!t. Then.. Was tao much AnOW .to net ctoAek but I thin[.-- you c-n see the eont,, wt bet►-,een its phe !, cn t conc4ii:4.on and that a 1 the p.ictu.tes Tom has .in h.is 'i..e6 ttc.l:e►: o.,!ien .the f'owetz,6 is r4ope4tN. 7..i'41 a£s0 a strop cont.tazt '.- the .Po^':s not ,;:e r ,.,ekty on Oed t►re'a.t ray Road. Ma►y0 Y l;U e.c'L Pane 2 %fatclt 15, 199sG 1 fait to ace .'core my co► .6titute a aa/ttl on hearth hazaA•r when they ate 6ecuned Eart .P.ock,6 and window coveningA. TAea- paaa jho invade occupied Guitdinna stand a betters chance o6 letting ItrtAt. 6. I di4cu6aed .,6pectoA Jacob,' .tetterr with him on Febtuaty 6 and did not jotpow it up tvith a -teA. I toad cet.tainty Aemiss in not doing ay. Outing the course o4 +ck,6tion, I queatior.ecf Tom as to tuliet,' he had activatty made. z. (�c.tio►: on Feb)LuaAy 3 as stated in hiA tstteA. I questioncd t zcav,e en the moAnino o� Febtuaty 6 I went thnouah snow ot.-eA m! Fneea .to t tmine i�, any hoot ptinta ivete vcsabte. TheAe tvene none. Ile i►i�c.eated that fie woutr' '•ave .to malze an inapection in the 4utaAe i5 tequested, '�ethet . t not th.ete tvaa a now, I exptained .to Tom i intended to use .the buitdinga in the �Utute when I buitt my home there. They (,+ou! d nape ideat equipment and oatden A:tppty ato4ane buitdinna . A buitding c ntAactoA !ett the 6u.itd.ir•.,e weno wottl:r:•hite and bound • ougli to merit the expense o6 tet000ing .tu pteven.t any 4utthet deteAiotation 1-0 the too; which had atattcd when the Powetta tived there. A ,;.,-,:ing con.tAaet)-� sa.'q there woutri be no, 1,noblem in moving them to a;,o.theA toes*ion behind my ;utute house. Tf, e en � 4 o 4 cons.t.- :tc.tinq, a n -e szonape bui.t.c''ng troutd �a.t exceed the t o' %etuv,i.ng and mov.i.nn the exitit,_np buitdinga . Tom 6ugge6ted a coat o j paint woutd imptove the appeatance or .them. Aa rou Lrowt .there ate occupi d homes .%n the C.itu needing paint, with cats and junk aittinp o '•Lnd and with ou.tbu.itdinna Aeadty to Batt down. I Aeadit.y anteel at saint r►ou(� e.nea.te % bettel image. fie �Qt' tl:%s was tl;c so.Cu:'_iev to end .tbe ptobt.em the City exitt,. Tae,edote I plan `o rain.t the bui-flings b,/ .Faze SrAinn. i n t �+ , �. �, f � r ,you o•L IOltn Ae ..'LCa Critn ve t.i t? �'i b Cttab this c.iA.h me., n uauatty in n eer. .ving '3-6966. Since the was ador to d wi'Itcut r ,+ ,., aancc, I aa6ur+e Mou l t i not, Aequ•c.Ae m!/ „^,ese►icc a* .1 courfoc `irn. f!cwe.veA i ' necessaAy I a+itt be nar.)y to a,�anae jot r &—t my att. ,Ia attendance. In contzaat with .the !, vioua owner, ? •i.a;i to eoopetate it way I can and lio;��► the "Ztrf r.+it" be tr.i�..in to r�+at!� rvi.,:h me, .theAe4ote, i►.espectgut.f a^quest -hat lou c. n.t .tbe -, 60f"f4on and a.'tow ry to ,,,kocer-:l c+. .ff,e ! asib n r m,,, d.i6cu.66i.on witf. Tom. ineehe�.!! �:tCCn rtiU�lC M TO: Mayor and City Council �h1 FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator '�- DATE: March 24, 1986 SOBJ: Tearse/Shaver Right -of -Way Permit J�' Attached please find a resolution that is the permit allowing us - of City right-of-way for a dock for the Shaver/Teal se pr7pert-y. The Council conceptually approved utilization of an independent 25'x25' parcel for construction of a dock which would extend onto City's right-of-way. Conditions under which the permit is given are -)utlined in the resolution. Given the fact that the City does not have such a permit system on an annual basis it is recommend- ed .gat it be adopted on an ongoing ba,sis sl.bject to revocation at any time deemed appropriate by the City c zt such time as the conditions are not met. Proposed Motion - Moved by __, seconded by to adopt Resolution No. _ granting right-of-way Ft­rmi.t to the Shaver/Tearse property application PIb _____ Ayes Nays Cite of OR,ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL "10. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A Pr:RM I T FOR THE PRIVATE USE OF THE: RIG► -OF-WAY OF FERNDALE ROAD PER MU. CIPAL CODE SECTION 12.07 FILE NO. 972 WHEREAS, Shaver Corporation of Wayzata, a Minnesota Corporation, (herinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 1080 Ferndale Road West within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows: That part of Lot 6, North Shore Cottage Acres, Lake Minnetonka, lying Northwesterly of the following descr.ibed line: Commencing at the most Easterly corner of said Lot 6; thence Northwesterly along the Northeasterly line of said Lot 6 a distance of 40 feet to the point of beginning of line to be described; thence Southwesterly parallel with the Southeasterly line of said Lot 6 to the Soithwest.erly line of said Lot 6 and said lire tYcre terminatinq, and that part of Lot 9, North Shore Cottage Acres, Lake Minnetonka, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Lot 9; thence South along Westerly line 25 feet; thence at an angle Southeasterly parallel with the Northeasterly line 25 feet; thence at right angles Northeasterly parallel with Westerly line 25 feet to Northeasterly line also being the County Road; thence Northwesterly to point of beginning, (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, per Section 12.07, the applicant has applied to the City for a permit to allow the installation of a residential dock on an unused portion of Ferndale Road West adjacent to applicant's submerged riparian lot (P.I.D 02-117-23 43 0011). Minnesota: NOW, THEPEFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the city Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. The application was reviewed as part of Zoning File No. 972. 2. On November 25, 1985, the Orono City Council (hereinafter "Council") granted a conditional use permit to the applicant (Resolution 01886) approving the installation of an accessory structure on a substandard riparian lot that. can not sustain a principal structure. A condition of that approval required that the applicant execute a special lot combination recognir,ing the proposed pattern of use and historic ownerF-hip relationship between the homestead and r i par i an I cats separated by Ferndale Road West. Page 1 of 4 City of OR ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3. The Council reconfirm; and once again adopts the special findings noted in Resolution #i1.686 For this permit review. 4. Council wishes to resta+.e the following specific findings in grantino the permit for this uniz�,ie property: a) The applicant's property consists of 2 separate parcels di-rided by a public road. The properties can not be legally co ibined . b) The riparian tract was created in 1945 prior to the adoption by the City of formal subdivision regulations, the riparian tract is substandard per current zoning standards. c;) The properties are divil.ed by a 66 foot public road right-of- way. d) The original owner of the property, Henry Skarp, created the riparian tract specifically to provide riparian access for the interior Lot 6. e) The two properties have been recognized as one unit on a Certificate of Title for several years. f) The City of Orono staff has considered the property riparian to Lake Minnetonka and has advised the previous and current owner as such. g) The proposed private use of the unused portion of right-of-way of Ferndale Road West will not conflict with the public's use C%f the roadway or create hazards in the public use of the road right-of-way. 5. The Council has considered this application, reports by staff, the written and oral comments of the applicant and applicant's agents and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. 6. The Council finds that. granting a permit for the proposed private use of a public property will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the public, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property, is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the owner; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Toning Code and Comprehensive Man of the City. Page 2 of 4 +.; City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. -- - - _ CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Rased upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a permit per Section 12.07 of the Municipal Code to permit the installation of a residential dock on the unused portion of Ferndale Road West subject to the following conditions: 1. Owner is placed on notice that the City is granting a provisional permit by which the City retains the right to ask for removal of said dock if the improvement of Ferndale Road West is realized and the expense of the removal of said dock shall be borne by the owner. 2. Dock structure shall not extend into dry shoulder area of right-of- way. 3. Applicantmust apply to the City of Orono for a building permit prior to the construction of said dock. Applicant must also provide approval by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District of the plans for dock construction and placement. 4. Pedestrian access to dock allowed only. Future users of the dock may not park automobiles or other mobile vehicles within the usec! r ight.-of. -wr. y tf Ferndale Road West. 5. The undersigned shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, the City Council, and aq.ents and employees of the City from and against all claims, damages, losses or expenses, including attorney fees, which the City, City Council and agents and employees of the City may suffer or for which it may be held liable, arising out of or resulting from the assertion against them of any claims, debts or obligations in consequence of the applicant's proposed private use of the unused portion of Ferndale Road West. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 14t.h day of April, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Ha lin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor (1) Property owner Page• I of. 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 1986 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared _ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC --- MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On thi7 day of. , 1986, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the persons) described in and who executes' 'ie foregoing it+strume,it, and acknowledged that he (they) c; -d the same as his (their) free act and deed. N iTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 4 of 4 } ', i , �yE� TO: Mayor and City Council �r � l����.z, lrjqrING FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator APR 14 1986 DATE: March 24, 1986 0 Y OF ORONO SUBJ: National Volunteer Week Attached please find a Resolution proclaiming April 20 - April 27, 1986 National Volunteer Week in the City of Orono. Pr -.posed Motion - Moved by , seconded by that the City adopt Resolution No. _ establishing April 20 - 27, 1986 as National Volunteer Week in the City of Orono together with proclamation thanking all the city's volunteers for their excellent efforts. Ayes _ , Nays City of ORC' NO RESGLUTION OF THE CITY COUi;_ NO. A RESOLUTION DECLARING APRIh 20 THROUGH APRIL 27, 1986 AS NATIONAL. VOLUNTEER WEEK IN THE CITY OF ORONO WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota, by proclamation of Governor Rudy Perpich, has daclared April 20 through April 27, 1986 National Volunteer Week; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono during its entire history has to a large degree depended on the volunteer efforts of its citizens to make it a quality community; and WHEREAS, members of its various Commissions, such as the Planning Commission, Park Commission, and Human Relations Commission, have spent endless hours and considerable devotion to the City in order to make and keep Orono a quality community; and WHEREAS, the City and its contract cities are :opendent co a great degree on its Police Reserve Force to provide needed personnel for demand times together with taking on special projects that would not otherwise be able to be accomplished in the community; and WHEREAS, provision of its fire service is dependent to a large degree on the volunteer and part paid efforts of the four departments with whoin it contracts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Orono declare April 20 `through April 27, 1986 as National Volunteer Recognition Week in Orono and -additional thit copy of this Resolution be sent to all of its Commissioners and Police Reserve people aE a small token of expressing its appreciation for their hard work, dedication. and expressing our thanks for a job we 1 1 done. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 14th day of April , 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor APR I! JX46 TO: Mayor and City Counci;-�,,, OF PRJr;W FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City AdministratorC DATE: March 24, 1986 SUBJ: Crystal Bay Sewer Project - Caucus Resolution Attached please find a letter from Paul Taylor transmitting a resolution adopted at the Independent Republican Caucus at the Art Center on March 18, 1986, together with a letter in response thanking Mr. Taylor for his efforts. As noted, copies have been sent to the City's legal counsel. Proposed Motion - Moved by ^__, seconded by __, that the City Council acknowledge receipt of the caucus resolution dated March 18, 1986. Ayes __ , Nays _ _ March 19, 1986 Mr. Mark Bernhardson City Administrator City of Ornno P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mark: The attached resolution was passed last evening at the Orono Precinct I caucus. The meeting was held at the Art Center of Minnesota. As convenor of the caucus I pointed out to the group that this resolution was not of a nature that could be included in the IR party platform. However, the group could decide if they wished to have their feelings regarding the resolution communicated to the City of Orono. A majority of the caucus attendees voted in favor of callii,i for the question and also in favor of :he resolution. The caucus asked me to transmit the approved resolution to appropriate C*ty of Orono officials. Please let me know if ;you have any questions MI'� Paul A. Taylor PAT/dmb Attachment cc: Mary Butler Mayor of Orono ` 1(4-7 -- Randolph Lukanen 1085 South Brown Road 2 0 11986 PiSOUMON WHEREAS the City of Orono Crystal Bay Sanitary Sewer Inprovertents Project 85-1 for the area of Orono known as Crystai Ba•'i, was deerod by a Hennepin County survey to be a low to mode:. -ate incase level neighborhood, and MTERFAS the Orono City Council has recognized that recent State Supreme Court decisions make it difficult to assess the entire cost of a municipal project to only the benefited properties, and has recognized that Crystal Bay has an average estimated residential market value (1985 taxes) of $64,200.00, and recognized thr' based on a report by are independant apprdi.ser hired by the City of Orono, it is unlikely Uiat all of the benefited properties will realize an increase in�alue, and "iERFAS in other utility irprovelients of record in the Orono City offices, ,project costs have '.-*ren reduced to t►ie bene- fited properties by spreading part of the cost to the ge seral t`x base, and 1-11iI:RFAS the properties in Ciystzil Bay have been included in the Orono sewer district since 1964, and were assessed for the sewage treatment facility k,-ioNm as the French rake Sewage Treatment Plant., and WiiI2FAS Crystal Bay property owners petitioned t�r sanitary sewer in April, 1970, when nro-ject costs were substantially less, even after applying the annual cost of living increases between then and now, but were rejected by the Orono City Council and WHEFEAS the affected property uwners of Crystal Bay objected to the unreasonably .sigh assessment for the 85-1 Crystal Bay Sanitary Sewer Improvements Project, BE IT THFRFM.RF RES(-)I.VFD t-hat the City of Orono, Precinct I, INDEPLNDFNT ITI'UBLICAN PARTY, meeting at its biennial precinct caucus this 18th clay or Marc.`t, 1986, requests UN Orono City Council to immedidtely grant relief to the property owners affected by the Crystal Bay Sanitary Sewer Improvement Project 85-1 by reducirni said assessment by ot-w-half (50%) of the assessrrrt and by spreading the other one --half (50%) of the assessvnt aver the entire City of Orono tax base. �r , CiTYof ORONO Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota Nanigw! V On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka March 21. 1986 Paul Taylor 3075 Farvie., Lane Long Lake, MN 55356 Dear Paul, ifITY OF VRui o Thank you very much for transmitting the Resolution from the Independent Republican CaucuF, on Tuesday, March 18, 1986. This resolution will be transmitted to the Orono City Council for its next meeting. As yoc are aware, the situation is currently in litigation and as such has been additionally referred to the City's legal staff. We appreciate the t:�,e end effort you have taker, to tr&n3mit this resolution. I appreciate your efforts to keep the City so promptly informed r Sincerely, Mark E. Bernhardson City Administrator MEB/pp K(FIFpk(,&INM. 4717Ft7 0 A10MMSIRAt(FON&FI%A%tF 47,1'1S6 0 P'181N WOOKS 4717049 } '5 (:ITY of ORONO 'i PDAt Office Buz 66 • C►yatal Bay, Minneeota 55M • Munk irsel Officm On the North A,, •e of Lake Minne- ha �' ►;j1t ;� �r�"�', � � April 4, 1986 3F Mrs. Marion B. Jungermann Senate District Q DFL Chair 16CA Excelsior vd Minnetonka, MN 55345 Dear Mrs. Jungermann, Thank you very much for tranmitting the Resolution from the Democratic -Farmer Labor Party caucus on Tuesday, March 18, 1986. This resolution will be transmitted to the Orono City Council for its next meeting. Since the situation is currently in litigation it has been additionally referred to the City's legal staff. We appreciate the time and effort you have taken to transmit this resolution. I appreciate your efforts to keep the City informed. ncVrely r rk f3.. ardson City Admix, trator MEB/dh IN 11 I)1rt:• 1'O*rI1V(: 4717157 • ADU NISi1tAn0%& FINANUF - 473.7158 • Pt RI N' WORKS - 473 7359 AW %IU%G March 20, 1996 City Council c/o" Citv of Orono 1335 South Brown Road Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RF: Attached Resolution Honorable May -nd Council: At its biennial precinct caucus, held March 18, 1986 at 9:00 p.m., in the Orono council chambers at 1273 South Brown Road, the City of Orono, Minnesota first precinct Democratic -Farmer Labor Party debated and unanimously passed the attached resolution pertaining to the City of Orono Crvstal Bay Sanitary Sewer Imnrovements Project 85-1. As Chair of the Senate District 43 Democratic -Farmer Labor Party, I am forwarding a cony of this resolution to you for your consideration. Please advise me as to your disposition of this matter. Kindest Regards, Marion R. JunRermann Senate District 43 DFL Chair 1034 Fxcelsior Blvd 'linnetonka, MN 35345 i R F S(tt.t rrT nm !-P'FpF.Ar, the City of Orono Crystal Pay Sanitary Sewer Imnrovesments 11roiect R;-1 for the area of Orono known as Crystal Bay, was ,teemed by a Nennenin County survey to he a low to moderate income level neighborhood, and WHEREAS the Orono City Council has recognized that recent Stat^ Sunreme Court decisions make it difficult to assess the entire cost of a municipal project to only the benefited nronerties, and has recognized that Crvstal Ray has an average estimated residential market value (199 5 taxes) of 564,2nn.nn , and recognized that, based on a report by an indenendent annraiser hired by the City of Orono, it is unlikely that all of the benefited nronerties will realize an increase in value, and MfFRF.AS in other utility improvements on record in the Orono City offices, vroiect costs have been reduced to the bene- fited nronerties by snreadinp hart of the cost to the general tax base, and MHFRF.AS the nrooerties in Crvstal 'iav have been included in the Orono sewer district since 1964, and were assessed for the sewage treatment facility l-nown as the French La):e Sewame Treatment Plant, and WW.RF.AS Crvstal Ray nronerty owners petitioned for sanitary sewer in Anril, 197n, when nroiect costs were substantialy less, even after an,)lvinR the annual cost of livtnr, increases between then and now, but were rejected by the Orono City Council and WtIF.RFAS the affected nronerty owners of Crystal Bay objected to the unreasonably hi}th assessment for the 85-1 Crystal Bay ganitary gewor Improvements Project, BF. IT THF.R17FORE RF.SOLVFD that the City of Orono, Precinct I, DFwMR-kTIC-FARMER LABOR PARTY, meetir.v. at its biennial precinct caucus this 1Rth day of March, 119j, requests the Orono City Council to imediately Brant relief to the nronerty owners affected by the Crvstal Ray Sanitary Sewer Inirovement Project SS-1 by reducinr said assessment by one -halt (SM) of the assessment and by snreadinR the other one-half (SM) of the assessment over the entire Citv of Orono tax base. -.in- �A`��i�4#� 1- 47 FrING +4�,•r TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator ?: 0r'�� FROM: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator DATE: April 9, 1986 SUBJ: Driveway Easement - 1180 Elmwood Ave. Attached please find a quit claim deed for driveway easement for 1180 Elmwood Ave. The financing agency and Minnesota Title Company is requiring this type of document for this property. L`gal staff has reviewed the request and although it is highly irregular is recommending appproval of same. PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by _, seconded by that Council approve the information as presented by staff for driveway easement at 1180 Elmwood Avenue. Ayes _, Nays _ WAY NE O. POPHAM ROGER W. SCHNOSRICIi DENVER KAUFMAN DAVID S.00TY ROBERT A. MINISH ROLFE ^.WOODEN G.MARC WHITEHEAD BRUCE U. WILLIS rn F.DERICK S. RICHARDS 3 R-ISER! JOHNSON CARP R. MACO118ER ROSE RT S. BARK HUGH V. PLUN KETT.M FRED'_RICK C.BROWN THOMAS K. BERG JAMES R.STEILEN POPHAM, HAIK, SCHNOBRICH, Kr'.UFMAN & DOTY. Li D. 4344 IDS CENTLR MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESvfA 55402 TELEPHONE AND TELEC 'ER 6 1 2 - 3 3 3 - 4 8 0 JAMES B. LOCKHART ALLEN W. HINOERAKER CLIFFORD M. GREENL D_ WILLIAM KAUFMA i MICHAEL O. FREEMI.N HOWARD DAM MYER.I.M THOMAS C.D'AOUILA LARRY D. ESPEL JANIE S. MAY CRON THOMAS :. BARRETT JAMES A. PANE DAVID A. JONES LEE E.BHEEH/' ALAIN FRECON LESLIE GILLETTE MICHAEL T. NILAN P09EPT H. LYNN ROBERT C. MOILANEN THOMAS F. NELSON THOMA4 J. RADIO DAVID L. HASHMALL KATHLEEN M. MARTIN JOHN C.CNiLDS r)OUGLAS P. SEATON 7HL.:•AS E. SANNE F. BRUCE B.MCPHEETERS GARY D. BLACKFORU SCOTT E. RICHTER GREGORY 1 WILMES ELIZABETH A.THOMPSOH KEITH J. HALLELAND MARK S. PETERSON Ms. Jeanne Mar,jsth City of Oronj P. O. Box f,6 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 T 7TH1 W. KUC.. + )LIE A. SWEITZER Ti .')M-S C. MIELENNAUSCN KATHLEEN A. BLATZ MICHAEL D.CHRISTENSON J MICHAEL SCHWARTZ LARATE M.OSBOPNE MARK F. PALMA BONNIE G. RESNICK n VSSELL S.PONESSA BRYAN L.CPAWFORD DAVID K. RYUEN OWEN E.NERRNSTAD- MATIHEW C.OAMON U. COUNSEL FRED L-MORRISCI. March 27, 1986 1�1;i AM NOtgT 'rJV+I.R 345 ST. PETCR STREET SAINT PAUL.MINNESOTA 55102 TELEPHONE SIR -333-4BT8 SUITE &.00 1200 SEVENTEENTH STREET DENVER. COLOPIADO 60801 TELEPHONE 303-093-It00 TELECOPIER 3D3-893-2194 SUITE 300 SOUTH 180C1 M STREET, N. W. WASHINCATON, D. C. 20030 TELEPHONE IZClI 02d-S300 TELECO►TER tZQ&I 490-58I0 DIRECT DIAL 344-0549 Re: Quit Clain Deed for Driveway Over Former Lewin Property (1180 Elmwood Avenue) Dear Jeanne: Inclosed please find an original quit claim deed as drafted by Mr. Roger Reed, the attorney for Paul and Wendy Lewin. This deed proposes to have the city grant a 13-foot wide perpetual easement for driveway purposes co the Lambrechts, who now own the Lewin property. This quit claim deed would affect the west 13 feet of the east 43 feet of the sleuth 10 feet of Lot 14, "Skarp and I.indquist's Ferni.ill," Lake Minnetonka. The City obtained the south 10 feet from the state fUL road purposes. Deeding of this perpetual easement will take city council ac_tior.. It is my understanding that the next regularly scheduled city council meeting is April 14, 1986. Please sch, tlule this easement deed as an item on the council agenda for that evening. I have reviewed the farm of the deed and it is proper. MAR 3 1 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth March 27, 1986 Page 2 I lave no accurate survey to compare Mr. Reed's legal description to the actual placem.:nt of the driveway on the property. Mr. Reed informed me that he scaled the survey himself and came up with this definition. It appears to be a fairly close description of where the driveway sits when one reviews the survey given to us. Also, as you and I discussed, a 13-foot driveway is not unreasonable. Mr. Reed has also cent a copy of his proposed deed to the title insurance company. If I am informed by Mr. Reed that the title insurance company will not accept the deed as a sol-ftion to the problem,, I will inform you immediately so that you may remove this item from Lhe council agenda before April 14. Very --.truly yours, / Nancy > Husnik Legal Assistant NEH/dnd cc: Mr. Roger Reed 8Q52f Form No. 32-hi QUIT CLAIM DIED No delinquent taxes and transfer ciitered; i Certificate of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required Certificate of Real Estate Value No. ,19 ounty Auditor by Deputy i STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: (reserved fc-c recordiriL data] Dated: 1986 FOR VALUA3LE CONSIDERATION, City of Orono, a Municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, urantor, hereby conveys and quitclaims to Jon W. Laabrecht and Deneen Lambrecht, Grantee(s) as joint tenants, real property iil Hennepin County, Minnesota, deperibed as follows: A perpetual easement for driveway purposes over and across the Peet 13 f•- et of the East 43 feet of the South 10 feet of Lot 14, "3_arp and Lindquist's Pernhill", Lake Minnetonka. together with all hereditaments xnd appurtenances belonL.in thereto. City of Orono By t_I__s STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before one this day of _ , 1986, by a rid t ie an of the City of Orono, a Municipal corporation, under the laws of the State of !Minnesota , on behalf of the City. notarial stamp or seal (or other title or rank) r oignature of person taking acknowled .er:ent Thie instrument was drafted by REED & POND, LTD., 5424 Shoreline Blvd., P.O. Box 357, Mound, MN 55364. Tax statement for the real property described in this instrument should be sent to (Include name and address of Grantee): FROM: NANCY E. HUSNIK POPHAM. HAIK, SCHNOBRICH. KAUFMAN & DOTY. LTD. 4344 IDS CENTER MINNEAPOLIS 55402 1 00 i 612-333-48M DATE 41AIa4 f7c ; c 4s3 s s,� t' c fz �-L Ott, 0 rLWO �L ICA \y -155. 0 i a �j za 49 i5 V `td 3 �J L 31.0 _ 532�0 = ±►Ar 9 � � 7 L -GA. � • vhE v /55.0 ED GE W'0 0D AVENUE- _ �_ TNTEROFFICE MEMOa'11f1G DATE: April 9, 1986 i. f� '�'Q 141., 'u TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administ�#' sty •: �. and Orono Council FROM: Mel Kilbo, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Retirement of Ass't. Chief. Burmaster Attached to this memo you will f.inG a retirement form signed by Winton Burmaster, retiring effective April 30, 1986. Ass't Chief Burmaster started police service as zi part-time officer in the City of Minnetrista in 1960. He came to Orono on 10-1-62 and has served honorably proc;ressinq through the ranks to Assistant Chief in Jaruary of 1980. He has received many accolades from the community through the years and has been ii credit to the D,par.tment and the City. PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by seconded by that Council accept the resignation of Assistant Chief, Winton Burmaster, effective April 30, 1986. AyQs Nays VILLAr,E Or ORO,40, J,,! IESOTA STATEAE11T OF RES I 4ATI ON Prepare 3 copies i4A'!E OF EIPLOYEE POSITION TITLE Winton Burmaster Assistant Chief Department Orono, Minnesota Stateuent of Resignation: Salary Rate Full Time x $16.709 hr. Part Time ` I request that this resignation be accepted by t;ie Village Council to become effective on A ril 30 1986 w;licli is the last day of actual service. I am requesting compensation for personal service to the Village in the above indicated position for accrued annual leave clue for days. The reason for this resignation is as follows: I would like to leave vacation and sick lea•.e in escrow for health insurance premiums. Reason - RETIREMENT Date: April 7, 1986 zd-e' _-,V_—(jAPAJ-. __. (Employee's Signature) Recommendation of Department (lead: I would ( ) wonid not ( ) rr - ' this employee. T.iis position may not be refilled witil Date: epartinent Heat Certification of Accrued Leave: Payment for days accrued leave upon a-inloyee'e termination on is hereby authorized. Data: (Village AdmInistratorl APR 14198P TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Rdm: strator uIT OF NOW FROM: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Ccuordinat.or DATE: April 8, 1986 SUBJ: Temporary Employment Each year the City of Orono employs temporary counter helpers and maintenance helpers at the golf course. The following persons have been employed at the golf course for the past several seasons and have indicated an intr -st to return. It is my recommendation to to employ the following persons effective April 7, 1986: Doug Erickson - Counter helper @ $4.90/hour Betty Stevens - Counter helper @ ; .45/hour Stephanie Sligo - Counter helper @ $4.40/hour Roy Peterson - Counter helper @ $4.20/hour Elizabeth Gallo - Counter helper @ $4.20/hc.,ur Don Oas - Maii.tenance helper @ $4.20,1hour pp PROPOSED MOTION: Moved uy __ seconded by to employ temporary help at the Golf Course as presented by staff_. Ayes ___, Nays _ y -SING �'.Pt,111 u TO: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator : '.'s'�1!� FROM: Jack Brinkhaus, Street Department Foreman DATE: April 4, 1986 SUBJ: Spring Cleanup Days - May 3 and May 10, 1986 The City of Orono Public Works Department is planning a spring leanup on Saturdays, May 3 and May 10, 1986, i rom 8:00 a.m. to ::30 p.m. The collection point will be behind the long, gold equipment shed at Brown Road South and Spates Avenue in Crystal Bay, next to the Administration Building. The following items will HOT be accepted: Barrel s Tires ;a rbage Trees Brush Chemicals Truck Loads Leaves and small items will have to be bagged and tied. Newspapers and all paper products must be tied securely. ORONO RESIDENTS ONLY!! PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by _ , seconded by __, that the Orono annual Spring Clean Up be scheduled for Saturday, May 3rd and Saturday, May 10th from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Ayes Nays 41086.1 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mel Kilbo, Police Chief DATE: April 10, 1986 SUBJECT: Trapping Permit - 1700 Shoreline Drive Attached is a trapping permit from Mr. Jacobs. This permit has been reviewed by this department, we have received no objections from adjacent property owners and the DNR has no objections. Approval of this permit is recommended for a period of 1 year. PROP( ZD MOTION: Moved by , seconded by, that the City Council approve the trapping request for property located at 1700 Shoreline Drive for a period of one year. Ayes _, Nays _. 11' PLT CAT i (A LIM I'rED LEGHOLD TRAP PC- R[4'I'V DATE: ,�i �' , 19'/ . Application Number: Name: --r' tj "A) (-c' Address: Locati.on of Trapline: -roNQNQGe- /t'KC- Number of Traps: /2- MaLntenance procedure for trapline: ��✓c�e�'a a ri- f.✓� -1 Period of time needed for permit: % /- Purpose ( Include written statement of hardship) 7-/, l ra s, , At V e _ I agree to furnish a certified property owners list of property owners within 500 feet of trapping area. Property owners will be notified of application. I agree to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and Local Laws including ordinance 2',2. 3Pna sire of Appl-16ant Fee paid• 1/ r` RECOMMETMED: Yes No i I Date L Check j e'( tc..- Cash b1 c Sla?"0 y Director � .� _, r Initials APPROVED: Yrs i_J No City ni:-t ra or Certified 11st of property owners within 1,100 fort of your trapline can he obtained from the Hennepin Co inty Property -� D-sr.ription Office, A-605 County Government CAnier, downtown Minnnnrnlis. ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT MESS KEY CON TRUL NUMBER 10CA1I CONT AGENCY NCIC IDENT.ICAGI DATE/71ME AED047 MADE E C 1 /(-�. ©iV1 �� M N_ 0 I? 17 /ISM / L NSA DATE REPOR rED (RPD) TIME RPD (TAP) I.00ATiON GRID NOR (LGN) DAY: S M T W T F i / 0 JV � i / F / r PLACE COMMITTED IPLC) _7�06 mho ro r , _El- ----_. __ --- HAD Codes y T L NBA F R0 SQUAD OR BADGES(�SSNI (-I I�ME ASIG. (TAS) TIME ARR. (TAR) TIME CLR (TCL) T R — Redo* I -- - — -- A — Alarm I P� L NOR ISN OC UCS r FICER ASSIGNED ASSISTED BY ( — In Person 4 / I/��_ / — V - Vowel I iV NOR r1 ` M— Mail �a T — OtMr OFFENS90 OR INITIAL COMPLAINT � OTHER PRINCIPAL: r QpQIM1 �tM1 _ __ COMPLAINT OOFFENDER )� ICT p — D.O.S. i Bu51N�S5 AOORE.SS BUSINESS ►HO%F HCME ADDRESS HOME PHONE OTHER REPORTS INCLUDED Impound ❑ Prop Inventory ❑ Implied Consent ❑ Accioent Report ❑ Tsgs ❑ 'nfluence Report ❑ Photoe [] REPORTING PERSONQOFFENOERC]VICTIM[] O.O.B. BUSINESS ADDRESS BUSINESS PHONE HOME Ifxf�S— HOME PHONE + SEE CASE FILE ROLL CALL. C Warn & Release I Dept. Assist Message Deliver Treated & Tra^spo led Adv;sed Citation Issued De±ail Completed G.O.AIV fl- COPY TO - Los, CO ATTNY ❑ CITY ATTNY 0 COURT`13' CHIEF U OTHER D::.POS(T(ON lJnfu;,-did Clf,rr^ by arrest Ref, ot+Ier awicy 11'active Other Q; F II f_R'S SUP R'ISGR'S SIGNATURE RUN DATE 03/20/86 BATCH 004 38 03-117-23 44 0001 PROP AOOR 01685 FOX ST WIER NAME SALLY 0 HANSER / TAXPAYER SALLY 0 HANSER NAME/AODQ 1685 FOX ST WAYZATA MN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY r~IPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PR(PLk:: OWNERS LIST 38 10-117-23 11 0002 PROP ADOR / OWNER NAME BURLINGTON NORTHERN RY V TAXPAYER BURLINGTON NORTHERN RY NAME/ADDR P �1' ' � coo-) +� r N r 38 03-117-23 44 0002 01765 FOX ST CODECO INTERNATIONAL INC CODECO INTEPNATION INC C/O KIELAS WEBER RIELAND 11601 MINNETONKA MILLS ROAD MINNETONKA MN 55343 38 10-117-23 14 0001 01700 SHORELINE OR �/ .IRWIN L JACOBS L WIFE i' IRWIN L JACOBS 1700 SHORELINE DR ►AYZATA MN 55391 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 8 38 10-117-23 11 0001 CODECO INTERNATIONAL INC CODECO INT INC ✓ C/O KIELAS WEBER RIELAND 11601 MINNETONKA MILLS ROAD MINNETONKA MH 55343 TOTAL BATCH 004 00005 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF OPERT TAXATIa(, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEf-! DATE.�J� Y/L/�' BT March 28, 1986 To whom It May Concern: Mr. Dennis Austad, caretaker for Mr. Irwin Jacobs, 1700 Shoreline, has applied for a trapping permit to use leghold trips to control beaver on Mr. Jacobs property. These traps will be twelve in number underwater and tended daily by Mr. Austad. 'There is a hardship to Mr. Jacobs as the beaver are killing and felling trees onto a road and into the water. The permit period requested is for one year. Any comment or objections should be addressed to the office of the Chief of Police by April 10, 1986. Sincerely, ..- LZ Melvin Kilbo Chief of Police MK:sb 4-8-86 Sir; The trappbr who will be doing the tr •pping for Ir%•,in Jacobs is Steve Eiden, Rt. 3, Glenco, YN, I;:r. James Konrad, the local DNR officer has no opposition to the trapnin7 of the beaver on TanRnger Lrke. Dennis Austad caretaker for Irwin Jacobs 1700 Shoreline Dr. Wayzata, 14M. 55391 ID bo '01 3 "00040000000- , '00 0, TANA vo. LAKE TO: Mayor. Butler Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council. Members EPROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zening Administrator DATE: April 10, 1986 SIMI : Request for the use of a temporary dwelling on property located at 3705 Wayzata Blvd. On April 2, 19b6, Kathy and Brian Fulmer's residence was completely destroyed by fire. They have asked for permission to bring in a temporary mobile home to live in while they rebuild and also conduct their kennel business. In light of the business conducted on the site and urgency of their need, staff gave them permission to move in the mobile home - this was completed on April 5, 1986. The mobile unit has been located on the site in compliance with all setback standards. The unit will be served by the existing septic system. The mobile structure will serve as a principal. structure until the new home is completed. At the time the Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the new residence, the mobile home unit mu•t be removed from the site. The enclosed resoluticn has been drafted for your review and action. pp City of ORONO RESOLUTION Ok THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TEMPORARY USE OF A MOBILE HOME AT THE PROPERTY LOCATFM AT 3705 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WHEREAS, Kathy and Brian Fulmer (hereinafte.- "the owners") are the owners of the property located at 3705 h vz Ata Boulevard (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the property ha3 container! uoth the residence and commercial kennel business of the owners; and WHEREAS, on April 2, 1986, the owners' residence was completely destroyed by fire; and WHEREAS, the nature and operation of the owners' commercial kennel requires 24 hour attendance at the property; and WHEREAS, a temporary mobile home can be placed on the site in conformance with all setback and on site septic standards. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Orono, M;nnesoto, based upon the above findings approves the temporary use of a mobile home by Brian and Kathy Fulr Y on the property located at 3705 Wayzata Boulevard subject to the following conditions: 1 - The mobile home must be removed from the site prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the new residence to be const..ucted on the property within the next three months. 2 - Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted here__n, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3 - The undersigned <�wners have react, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution on behalf of t.hemselvos, their heirs, successors and ,assigns. Pa9v I ()1 i City Of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Adopted by the Orono City C unci 1 n this 14th day of April, 1966. ATTEST: Dorothy C. Hallin, C= Clerk il) Property Owner Mary C. Butler, Mayor Page 2 of > City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. - - -- ♦ y STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY CIO. HENNEPIN ) On this (lay of , 1986 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUB/:IC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day _ , 1996, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared kncwn to me to be the person(s descri.bcd ici and who executed tt±c foregoing instrument, and acknowtedc,ed that h,-, (they) executed the same as his (their) free act a,id deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page. 3 of 3 Early more"ink fh:e destroys Orono home uiukup •arly morning fire cm W, dnes- y morning, April 2, caused an estimated S1'5.0(X) t,) S200.060 in damages to the home of Brian and Kathy Fulmer, of W il', tata Baulevh..' in Orono. The fire. which yuicKl,, .,yea,.l through the newer A -frame hovle. started in the lower level of the home. Fire officials think the t:aw,e of the blaze was a lamp %ith a 100-A-att bulb near µhere the Fulrttrs' dog and her litter of pup- pies was sleeping. The lamp somchow was overtumcd and caul-,ht the dogs' bedding or: tire. Fire detectors alerted the sleeping famiN to the fire, and they left the home itnr;iediately An autumstic alarm system alerted the fire dcpan- men.t at 2:50 a.m. Six puppies were killed to the fire, but their mother Has sa%ed. and one or two of the puppics wer: also rescued, Assistant Long Lake Fire Chief Jim Cox s- J. The Fulmers operate a kennel, the Dog House:, on the pror:m , but tilt, animals hous- ed there and those fit;. tl!ties µere tim dani,!p.d, Cox said. It m as the fire alarnt; that save-1 the lives of tie. 'I'uimer tamii. sari Cox. "if there had not been firs' alarms, we would not hax e had on- ly six puppies kille(." Cox said, ad- ding a plea th.it people in:•t.01 fire alarnt:, if they don't ha%c the ,t .:nd that they mad e sure the hattl-res arc instilled and frc-,h if th,,, do hw e t:,cm. Cox al-;o t:rrc.tt;:1 the Fulmer-, µ ttit takjng the at;i:on m le-v. - i::g the nou-.4� irriltediatel% µhen the% heard the alarms. Though it me:jnt tltey escaped µ:th little more than what they µere wearin,.7. Cox esti111atcd that their only pith to safe- ty — the stairway — µ ould have been minu•e%. Between 10 and 5 lircft�l„�r from the Long Lake and Maple P.:i;n departments fought the early w =rn:- ing b;a:e. 'i't:c departments had the tiro '•kncxked doµn" withal 15 r,tinutes. said Cox. hilt hot spats kept recurring for it considerable time after that. Thcy Fuil�rwd 100X) gallons of water oil the fire, and sorne fires;..-n, µ1`1141 rrtt:st don ,t;r tanks for breathing wt,,--n fich'ing such a hot t:rc, went tlirtu,_h multi- ple tart:,, of air as the% retu-mc,l to the burning building Io a Vttrlgu,sh the Mace. ..I %Nas prr:ud of wit art-tfp fool descrihcd they cffor: !o I!t.tit tie blac wh h haJ goiner SO hest'o f.ftt. 'The l irL t fighters h.id f* c:t sou-ld asleep, and µ ithin 15 winute, OLeN had gluten tip, dres•.cd. !-+ V-- fire station, to the scene and into the l,w - ;:;ng building. Cox said. I I �o cvlo ,- JS 11 aw Ile KtN.` I TO: Mayor and City Council �\cr-7� y,7g LNG FROK?? Mark Bernhardson, City Administrators �.PR 14 IQ89 DATE: March 24, 1986 SUBJ: Administrator's Information `� �°� b�t�p. BIG ISLAND - This is to inform you that the Big Island Board of Governor's has submitted the applicable conditional use permit application for the summertime activities that it had mentioned at the March 10, 1986 meeting. We will be reviewing that and will probably be bringing it to the April 21, 1986 Planning Commission meeting. For vour consideration, it may be appropriate that in order for the group to }-Tow which buildings should be fixed up and/or removed, that the Board of Governor's develop their preliminary master plan at this point. COMPREHENSIVE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN - The City has been working v'th Hennepin County Soils & Water Office to develop a request for proposal for this plan. The significant cost for this appears to be a development of two foot contour maps. While all the aerial work has already been done by Mark Hurd, it may require up to $40,000 to do the balance of the community for which we do not currently possess those contours. Staff will be working further to see if the appropriate plan can be developed and bring back a cost estimate for that at the May 10, 1986 meeting. r r� � �'� r. •fin TO: Orono City Council. r'ROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE: April 11, 1986 SOBJ: Request by VanEeckhout Building Corporation for Sewer Connection - Property north of Long Lake Bank, east of North Brown Road NOTE: This letter of request arrived while Mark Bernhardson was on vacation and he has not had a chance to review it, hence I am including it as an information item only. The property in question is a parcel of about 140' x 1150' or 3.9 acres, of which approximately 2.8 acres is dry buildable. The property is adjacent to the City of Long Lake, and is adjacent to the VanEeckhout townhouses, with a sewer manhole available about 25' from the south property line (see topographical survey). Based on the location of the sewer so close to the property, and based on the potential problems with slow -perking clay soils and some steep slopes, VanEeckhout felt there would be a good case for connecting this property to the sewer. In my meeting with VanEeckhout and his site evaluator on the site on March 21., I concurred that indeed there appeared to be potential problems in locating a primary and alternate septic system on the property, and if they could document the infeasibility of using an on -site system, the sewer connection might be looked upon more favorably by the Council. Documentation submitted to date includes: A. Letter of request dated 4/7/E;6 - VanEeckhout makes 5 points: 1) Septic systems are more prone to failure than sanitary sewers (this is a "given"). 2) Impermeable soils on the site (alluded to by site evaluator, but sites have not been perc-tasted). 3) Steep slopes (perhaps the best argument for allowing sewer connection to this property). 4) Practicality (due to existing old foundation locations, the second or alternate site for a system would be 650' from the proposed home site). 5) Potential for a future subdivision (this seems remote with only 2.8 dry acres in a 2 acre zone). B. Letter from Steve Shirmers, MPCA Certified Site Evaluator. This letter documents the shallow depth to zones _)f seasonal saturation inferred by soil mottling, which would require use of a mound system. Mound systems cannot in any event be used where slopes exceed 12%, and only can be used on slopes of 6-12% when the perc rates are 1/2 - 30 minutes per inch, according to Orono's existing codes. Although perc testing has not been done, the soils found by Shirmers would likely have slower perc rates than are desirable for a mound on steeper slopes. VanEeckhcut Building Corp. Request April 11, 1986 Page 2 of 2 C. Topographic Survey - this has been provided by VanEeckhout, and I have analyzed the slope percentages and categorized them as 0-6%; 6- 12%; greater than 12%. The only adequately large site for a mound where slopes are 0-6% is an area at the midpoint of the lot that is very wet at the northerly end and appears to have been filled at the southerly end, hence would not seem very feasible for an on -site system. Aside from the philosophical questions and the restrictions on sewer connection imposed by the Comprehensive Plan, etc. in my opinion, in order to justify granting of a sewer connection, the Council should require adequate documentation to prove from a technical standpoint that art on -site system is not feasible on the property. This documentation should include logs of soil borings and perc testing, and this information has not been submitted, although I stated to both VanEeckhout and Shirmersthat this information will be r:ecessary to prove whether or not a system is feasible on the property. When Mark Bernhardson returns, we will meet with VanEeckhout to follow up on this matter. However, I expect VanEeckhout and the people whom he will be building for will be at the meeting Monday night and will request. that you discuss this at that time. PP VAN EECKHOUT BUILDING CORPORATION 1935 WEST WAVZATA BLVO , SUITE /165 • LONG LAKE. MINNESOTA 55356 • (612) 473-1576 April 7, 1986 Mr. Mark Bernhardson City of Orono F. 0. GoX 66 Crystal Bay, MN. 55323 Dear Mr. Bernhardson On February 6, 1986, I requested .- help and approval to hook up to a sanitary sewer located within the I),..nicipal boundries of Long Lake. You indicated that I should make further investigations as to the ability of the property to be served with an on -site disposal system and to get back to you if an o11-site system is not practical. I have had a survey and contour map prepared and have had Steve S014 Tiers, a soils and on -site disposal system specialist make a s.v:iy of tf " te. Mike Gaffron of the City of Orono also visited the site and was present during part of the evaluation process and had an opportunity to review the soil conditions. It seems highly desireable from many points of view, to hook up to the existing sanitary sewer, !,everdl being: 1. On -site systems always involve the possibility of failure, ana in this case, could result in lake pollution. 2. The soils on this site are highly impermeable and not desirable for an on -site system. 3. The slope of the ground is beyond desirable limits and further aggravates a very difficult site. 4. There are no good practical locations for an on -site system. 5. I have sold this lot with a single family home proposed to be constructed as soon as possible on the Easterly half of the lot. There is always the posibility of a future request to use the Westerly half of the lot for other purposes. I understand that this matter will have to be considered by the City Council and would request that it be placed on the agenda for the next meeting April 14th. Sincerely, C. E. Van Eeckhout President CE'//ja S-P TESTING, 951 KATYDID LANE ST. MICHAFL, MN 55376 497-3566 STEVE SHIRMEfiS VanEckhout Building Corp. Property owned by VanEckhout Property is located on the border of the city of Long Lake & East of Brown Rd & West of the lake -Long Lake. Oronon, MN. Henn. Co. L�00 INC. +E� IFn !il UI' _CITE G� G+,�►�; April 10, 1986 A site evaluation was completed oon the above property. This site has a strong clay loam soil with a mottled laver at 18" to 24". This site will need a pressurized mound system. There are 2 sites possible, north of the barn, which has a 8% slope. The system would be located up slope of the old foundation wall and 20' of the system would be over the old field road. The second site is approx. 650' west of Brown road with a 10% slope. Bot' sites will need to be tested, if used And are questionable due to the strong clay soil. The site !>y Brown road is questionable due to the distance for pumping. Z l 4 Steven B. Schirmers Soil and Percolation Tests Septic .system Design p oft GRE � az ��FS �' �2 .J• toe a 4p Ot ' owl SOL &"Ars *a 0"s III p.FR 1 l 1 e6 TO: Mark rds-)n, City Administrator FROM: John R. Gerhardsorl, Public Works Coordinator DATE: April 9, 1986 WSJ: Traffic Rev_ .w - H - , iy 12-Willow Dr. Intersection Can April 4, 1986, a traffic accident occurred at the intersection of Willow Driv and State Highway 12 in which one person w,; k i 1. 1 �A-i . because of the fatality, there has been great concern expressed by the public to do something with tri intersection. Because that intersection is in th, jurisdiction of Long Lake and Orono, a review is underway in both communities. Furti..r informa*i 11 be presented to you at a later date. �'P 4%A l417Mn L) T 1JI,TM TO: t9ayor & City Council FROM: City Attorney Kathleen t31atz DATE: April 10, i986 RF: Quorums & Effective of Aostentions The City Administr-.tor requested that our office provide the City Council with % morandum on what establishes a quo um for voting purposes and th, :ect of an abstention on the quorum. The analysis provided bclaw a distillation of case law on this subject matLF,r. If you .eve any other specific questions, please let oe kno,, I ...at .'i Quorum. rection 2.02 of the Crono City Code provides that a majority of all the members of the Council shall constitute a quorum although a smaller number may adjourn from time to time. Section 2.02 further prescribes that every ordinance needs a majority vote of all mumbers of the Council except when a different vote is require by law. All other actions of the CQur('a shall be decided by a major : , y vote of a quorum at a Council meet.lag except w"ere the law r.equir,.- a different number. M,nnesot:; Statute' Lao not specify a :.iinimum vote for all actic-t':: .en by a local u..it of govuinment. However, in the areas of the ioption and amendment of zoning ordinances and the comprehensive plan legislature has estabiist:ed that a two-thirds vote 13 required. Minn. Stat. 5462.355, 5462.357 (1984). Given the f.ve member Council, thr members must be pr 1,5ent and voting f ,r roost actions taken b t!ie Council to be ega,ly binding. noting, it is not necessary that the three me......ers constitu :.ie quorum be in agreement. A two to one vote, whether in f:av .n opposition of a motion, is sufficient to dispense wit' —e matter at hand unless an ex,raordinary vote is nice sitateJ jy titatute or ordinance ao .3utlined above. II. The F ect of Abstention on the Computation of ttie Voting Aajority The common law rule regarding the effect of an abstention is that whenever municipal officials are present and do not vote at all, they virtually acquiesce in the election made by those who do vote. The common law rule evolved because the courts were confronted with situations in which it appeared that one or more members of a municipal council had sought, by abstention from voting, to block or to impede the adoption of some measure even though, had they actually voted against the action, they could not have achieved such an objective. 63 American Law Reports 1077. The issue often arose in situations where one or two members objected to the appointment of some city official. By abstaining, and thereby preventing a quorum, the non -voting members could control the appointment even though a no vote would have been insufficient. In response to this problem, the !.-.;urts adopted the common law rule that an abstention is to be construed as agreement wi'.:i the motion before the body. The result is to prohibit a council member from accomplishing by inaction a result or a purpose which he or she could not achieve by proper participation, in necessary decision making. Several cc. is have modified the common law rule to allow an abstention to be counted as a negative vote when the non -voting member has in fact voiced oppoEition to the motion prior to the vote. This modification, however, is not the prevailing rule. Similarly, the courts have recognized that an abstention from voting may be due to a ►a mber's personal pecuniary interest in the matter at hand. An a �ssion of a member's conflict of :.iterest prior to a vote ied some court's to rule that the abstention cannot be count as an affirmative vote. See L. �iesey v< Secancus, 87 A 950 (Ni Sup. i91 Quinn v. Sea Isle City, 1 A 1118 (NJ 1909). This interpretation _..snot be relied upon in all instances. For example, in 1973 the North Dakota Supreme Court held that the abstentions of two Northwestern Bell employees, who refused to vote on a tax matter affect.ng their company were t) be counted as votes with the majority. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company v. Board of Commerce, 211 N.W.2d 39—(N.D. 1973). Given the fact that the Courts are not in total agreement on the effect of an abstention, it would b� prudent to def:?r the taking of a vote when a council member must abstain due to a `list of interest. Such deferment would leave the Council in a u ter oos.ition should tha vote ever be contested. KAD/jk 4497e Att G COUNI"' All -E ANG LIST OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL fi.F'R 1 4- K'1126 FOR MEETING OF April 14, 1986 4ITY OF ORON ! Se .ic System Installers License: 1. Ingleside Engineering & Const., Inc. Route 1, Box 175 Rockford, MN 55373 2. Earl W. Day & Sonb Inc. 520 Brimhall Avenue Long Lake, MN 55356 On-Sdie Beer - Orono Golf Course 265 Orono Orchard R6 ad South Special Events License - American Youth Hostels Minnesota Ironman Ride Bicycle Ride April 27, 1986 Home Occupation License - Ben Meinhardt 3585 Sixth Avenue North CITY of ORONO t,ryottal flay, Minnexota F632-1 SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTAi,LERS LICE14SE APPLICATION Utill l)IN(; A JONING - 473 7357 ASSLSSING All questions must be answered. License fee, bond, certificate of insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification or Home Sewage Treatment Workshop attendence must accompany this application. All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. 1. Business or trade name IngleLdde Enginezrllli; G'�rnst., inc. 2 . Business address H' # 1, iJ: x17' inn. 55373 3. Business phone b12 11;7 , tcb',, Residence phone 612 LT 2'iLl 4. Name of applicant nr company representative holding MPCA certification nn i-_rruzht 5. Type of certification held: _ Installer Pumper Site evaluator System designer Is -his a Provisional Certificate? lip Certificate No. 6. If no Ce-'_ificate is held, provide evidence of attendance at one of the On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshops held immediately prior to the current construction season. 7. Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? Most recent year S. Have you ever had a license revoked? When? Where? Do you do municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes No _ SUBMITTALS REQI,'IRED: 1. $25.00 license application fee. 2. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as obligee. The State Plumbers Band will not be accepted. 3. $10-50-100,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. 4. Copy of current MPCA Certificate or evidence of attendence - - at On -Site Sewage Treat -merit Workshop held irrsnediat.ely prior -o current construction season. LICENSES WILL. NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED. c� ` — List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to Or: apply for permits under y-ur license The undersigned her0)y makes application to the City of '__--- Orono, Minnesota, for license to install and repair septic systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws M of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of. the City of Orono, r Date ter. Applicants Signature lY „ Staff-ecommendat-ion Approval —- Denial L�- '� •_ CITY Reason for denial: USE. City Council Action pzte � Approve cl � _ Donied ONLY Date license mailed _ of� I N� � 1'rYe(al 14n.V. Minnrwiln NI'lI,U1tiGh /.(►tii�l; - 4737357 ASSLSSING SEPTI L SYSTEM INSTAL1,ElR< LIC:I'NS_" APPLICATION L,ond, certificate All queStl�ns must b(� answered. License fee, of in;;urance, and evidence of MPCA Certification or Home Sewage Treatment Workshop attendence must accompany this application. All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. 1. Business or trade name /IRL 2. Business address i �z-7 AA-1A4A(hL /4VA 3. Business phone �% j - gll() 3 Residence phone 4. N&me of applicant company_ repre3entative holding MPCA certification 4> _ 5. Type of certification hell'_ Installer Pumper Site evaluator System designer Is this a Provisional Certificate? 2D, . Certificate No. 6. If no Certificate is held, provide evidence of attendance at one of the On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshops held immediatell prior to the current construction season. 7. Have you ever held a Septic System Installer 'iccnse in Orono before? *_ Most recent year 1QPL 8. Have you ever had a license revoked? Ll,? Wren? Where:' �. Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes-4- No SUB TTALS REQUIRED: 1. $25.00 license application fee. 2. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted. $10-50-100,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. 4. Copy of current MPCA Certificate or evidence of attendance at On -Site Sewage Treatment Wcrkshop held immediately prior to current construction season. ':-V; LICENSES WILL NOT HE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS 1?RF. SUBMITT'- u List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license��,�� -- Lt--The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of Orono, Minnesota, for license to install and repair septic ��- systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of Orono. _ _ 1p ''. Date //�atGN Applicants Signature Staff. recommendation Approval `Denial Date.!Atrss_ CITY Reason for denial: __ —.-- USF City Counc±.l Action 1)-3te Approvod Donied ONLY Date licvj,_c mailed Date: Narne APPLICATION PARADES and SPECIAL EVENTS CITY of OkONO, MINNESOTA 55323 Mar t 12 86 c i _ 19 Application Nuilber American Youth Hostels, MN Council MINNESOTA IRWV%N RIDE Address 30 So. 9th Street YMCA, Min ,eapolis, MN 55402 Location of Parade or Event Bicycle ride starts at Theodore Wirth park ir. Golden Valley, and gees west to Wayzata and then on to Dela.,o and back to 'Theodore Wirth, with 4n opt �-onal loop from Delano to Buffalo Name of Persona- and/or Organizations Handling the Evert American Youth 9ostels, Minnesota Council Contact Person: Chris Gilchrist--776-2538 Phone Numbers._ . "i-;Qo 175-,ap4 -- - — Date of Event April 27, 19 86_ Hours of Event ** Reason or Purpose This is the 20th-annual 1rtC14M�; bicycle ride always held on the last Sunday in April Insurance Coverage `Yes _ _ _ _ ** A copy of the bicycle route is attached. The riders heave Theodore Wirth from 6 :30- Amount-A500L 00-_______- 9:00 ami should be going through your area frcn 7:30 to about 11:00 AM Company _._-Smithy Braedon-CogDany--__ - ---- Copy of Insurance Certificate --o be Submitted with this Application. I am aware of all applicable St -ate and other laws regarding Parades ano Special E.ventF and will abide by same. I also agree to hold the City of Orono harmless -rom all liabilities that may arise directly or indirectly from the Parade or Special Event approved by e granting��i�mit. Fee: $25.00 Signature of Applicant Fee Paid: — RECOMMENDED: - Yes_ No__ 1 Date: =.f- 19_(� Check �+' / /S 7--- Cash _ Public Safety Director Initials Approved: Yes No Clerk -Administrator Office Use Only: Remarks: 3- 84 1--qcordT PRODUCER Smithy Braedon Company Insurance Department 1110 Vermont Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Minnesota Council of American Youth Hostels, Inc. Room 203, YMCA 300 S. 9th Street Minneapolis, Minn. 55402 VT TAB &OPA ISSUE T c roF INSURANCE 3 1 86 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE r---- r:QMPANY LETTER A Insurance Company of North America COMPANY S LETTER L.._.._,._—,— i�.JMPANY SITEA C G.;VPAh� Q LI:'TER COMPANY E -E TTER TNIA IS TO CERTIFY THAT POI.ICIF.S OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN >SUEDTO THE INSURED NAMED ASO VIE FOIA THE POLICY nINIMMOICATM. NOT WITHSTANDINQ ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WI tH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJEZT TO ALL THE TERMS. EXCLUSIONS, AND 000101. TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIARIU'Y L VITi IN THOUSANDS TYPE OF INSURANCE —� POLICY N',VBER A ; : `y'•• ' —�T— crEGGaE(�A'E GENERAL LIABILITY --i------_— BOOIL COMPRENENSIVE cCgM PRE MISE S, bPERA TIONS A c':DE9GR0u10 EXPLOSION 6 COLLAPSE NALARD PAW.TS+'.OMPLETED OPERA114S CONTRACTUAL INDEPENDENT CONTAXTORS SRDAD IORM PROPERTY -Am<,F PERSONAL INJURY !SVP DO 8106319 I AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY 1N,I AUiO ALL !"Ili! PRIM PASS I All OWNED AI'T{`S ►NRED A! ITOS i;ARAGE A91 'Y ' EXCESS LIABILITY iVPfLLA I,RM I OTwER toww +gaE..A;,'AM i WORKERS COMPENSAT':ON AND I EMPLOYERS L:481LIT?' [Use THER------�.— R�PI,?N OF IPERAT CPNSrLOCAT:ONSIVEHtCLES;SPFC A• 'EMS nnesota Iron Man Bicycle Ride, 4/27/86. of Theodore Worth Park Picnic Shelter Minneapolis Park Board 310 4th Avenue ''inneapolis, Minn 55402 .1' I IIJUP, i S ---$ 10/ 1/85 10/ 1/86 �---- aC E $ �;�; 4Lj$ 5009 is 5009 is 50C• • +. IS a I F,X'IK O'V S I H t ,,.. S ,`A �Y SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBEO POLICIES BE CANCELLED SEFOAE THE EX- PIRATION DATE THEREOF. THE ISSUING COMP'„ Y WILL ENDEAVOR 'J MAIL DAYS WRITTEN NOTK:E TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO LEFT EUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SMALL WPM NO OKKiATK)N :?P t AMLIrV _OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY S N7f ONI RE SENT ATI VES AUTIIOptjEO REPRESENTATr\f.IF H. Milton Keen '__^= hELANO 17 30 --� nEo.Wurh t FOOD 12 s STOP $ijFr„ OPEN s 10 t Hci� st- Light I }0 1 J2 16 17 j 12 30 MINNESOTA IIiONMAN 100 K.— 100 M. Delay - ;2 t � ~ 1 r 1 ++ At 9:00, Lace Street vial be blocked off to ..+ L bikers for approx —tr'_p 2-3 minutes 3n order 15 1 for the *.;ayza-.a Ea" :am to begin, p1K" follow the d:rectiorn of tie run's road i m&rshalla. !J(7_'r: The ',:40!WAN route has bean LAKE c &nged here u Wayzata. The route vi:1 so 1 right on Ferndale and � -oceed to Ctp !id 6. � iDETAIL OF FIN'--. AN: FOR 10- v% MILE Rv' `i ONMAN rA G � 2 � t � oLiot I Bike Cedar n I 22 V. I t l DETAIL OF FINIbH AND UPPER LOOP ON OTHER SIDE FOR 100 MILE ROUTE COMPLETE LOWER k'1 UPPER LOOP TO: Nayor Butler Y',rk Bernhardson Orono Council Members FROM: Jeanne A. Mauusth DATE: March 26, 1986 SUBJ: Home Occupation License Application of Ben Meinhardt located at 3585 Sixth Avenue North Mr. Feinhardt plans to purchase the 4+ acre residential property ocated on the south side of Ccur:ty 'toad 6 just to the east of the Otten Nursery property (See Exhibit B). Access to property is at Sixth Avenue North. Meinhardt's current business is located in one of the commercial structures to be razed as part of the downtown bong Lake improvement project.. He plans to sell his current home and purchase the new site for his principal residence. The applicant requires a license from the City to allow him to operate his busir.e=s from his home. The existing pole barn to rear of residence will serve as garage for his truck and warehouse for part -. Nothing will be stored cutside. No sign?ge is planned. His wife acts as his secretary. The only other empioy(�e works from his own home and keeps the vehicle at his residence in Foxdome. It would appear that Meinhardt's operation as proposed satisfies all standards of Section 10.20 Subdivision 4(C). A` Istar Electric has been used on a regular basis by the City for the past few years. Mr. Mein!-rdt is a reputable local business man. He plans to operate his .,usiness from ..i's residence as many of our other loca; contractors. The site is well equipped to serve Meinhardt's use. The Building Inspector has asked to inspect the storage area once the applicant has m)ved to the site. All reviewi,z . .tai f members recommend approva 1 of the Home Occupation License application of Ben Meirhardt fin;ling all standards of the pertinent sections L)f the zoni :g code r been staisfied. Licensc- No. Q _ APPLICATION FOR (TOME.00CUPATION - 0.00 'Date hece.ived Orono Municipal Code Section 5.40 (�(� S Date Expires CITY OF ORONO 1335 BROWN ROAD SOUTH BOX 66 % CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 3 -13 -67` Name: C% Phone 3 f Address: —. - C- Number of Fmployees within operation _yr� Provide li:at of Names of Employees on back of this application `escri do of Rs-.jest PERMIT MAY EXPIRE IF ANY V10LATION OCCURS. CITY STAFF SHALL HAVE FIVE (5) BUSINESS DAYS IN WHICH TO INVESTIGATE AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATIOF PURSUANT TO ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE. IF A SITE INSPECTION IS REQUIRED BY CITY STAFF, THE:. EVIEW TIME WILL BE EXTENDED TO TEN (10) BUSINESS DAYS. ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON HOME OCCUPATIONS PURSUANT TO MUNICI1,%L CODE SECTION 10.20 SUBD 4(C) Prohibited Home Occupation Practices. A. It is unlawful for any business of sting as a home occupation to engage in operation without proper licenses. B. A1.1 perscns engaged in the busine, must reside in the dwelling. C. No commercial signs permitted other than signs perry' ted in a ram.=idential zone. D. No excessive st in trade ma- be store-d or. the premises. E. Over the counter retail sales is not allowed. F. F:ntiance to the home occupation must be gainer'. fromwitnin the struc... The unJ rsigned hereby agrees to the conditions .oLed above fr 7 the Orono Munic' �al Code :,d and ad,iitiona? requirements the City staff .fi; " .ve. Signature -of-Applicant- ----- - ----Date_..__ +__ `Lr O�r PUR CITY USE ONL7': After _:virw of application, staff recommends the followirg: Approval of dpplication ___ Denial of application Signature of Zoning Off.cial _ _�--� Vat4�: Signature of Firz Inspector: _ ___-_ __—__._. _-- __-- Date _ -- -- (OVER) NAMES OF EMPLOYEES (Employees must reside in the dwelling) c iJ i Name: jtQW Name: Address: Address: 3 'T_�31p Phone: �, Phone: C ise No. License No. Name: _� Name: Add- Address: F tor. Licen- Phone: License No. Name: jc � . Nap _ Address: _ Address: Phoydditional Phone: Lico. i.icense No. (If names, please attach list) Aa4 - r V iiz ED O - -- az ...�. AMID gp ai LIST OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR MEETING OF April 14, 1986 Limited Firearms Use Permit - Harold, John or Steven Panuska 3140 Watertown Road Permit Expires July 15, 1996 Septic System Installer - Halsted Contracting 14180 NE 91st Street Elk River, MN 55330 McCarty Water and Was to 6250 Highway 12 •,ast Maple Plain, MN 55�59 Solicitation License - Discount Flowers Alan Penke Route 2, Box 223 Cokato, MN 55321 Garbage 6 Refuse Collector's License - Blackowiak a Son 1195 Sunnyfield Road No. Mound, MN 55364 Woodlake Sanitary Service Inc 4000 Hamel Road HameL, MN 55340 CITY CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA a LIMITED FIREARMS USE PERMIT COME $10.00 OCCASIONAL XX PERMIT NUMBER 1986-01 $25.00 ANNUAL_ PERMIT EXPIRES July 15, 1986 (Club Only) This permit authorizes Harold, John or Steven Panuska Name of Holder to discharge_ Shot gun only Type of Firearm for Pest control Purpose from _ April 14, 1986 to July 15, 1986 Restrictions: Shot gun only - Notify Police at ;44-9511 prior to shooting This permit is issued for the above purpose. The hcldcr must obey all of the laws and ordinances of the United States, State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin, and City of Orono in the use of r'is permit. The permit may be revoked at any time by the City of Orono by notifying the holder in accordance with the ordinance granting the permit. Hunting of game animals or game birds is prohibited in the City. April 15, 1986 Date ai uea Ctt /� mtntat ator Act ng City A ministrator (SEAL) 4ITYof OR NO e.r..13.y. 7A mom a72521 SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS LICENSE APPLICATION SUILPINGA 7Oh LN(, - 473.7337 ASSESSING All questions must be answered. License fee, bond, certificate of insurance, and evidence of NPCA Certification or Home Sewage Treatment Workshop attendence must accompany this application. All applications are subject to a ten 110) day approval period. 1. Business or trade name "n1'.tCLJ Cr'A+-0C�'l, 2. Business address HNO ME !2�" 6K P Wof M0 55330 3. Business phone N(4)-'icy`" Residence phone 14L11"4Cu`3 4. Name of applicants or comppny representative holding MPCA cextification L)l rtnr- N0.htn cl 5. Type of certification held[ Installer _ Pumper ' Site evaluator System designer Is this a Provisions Certificate? _ Certificate No.L k4 6. If no Certificate is held, provide evidence of attendance at one of the On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshops held immmediatel: prior to the current construction season. 7. Have you ever held a Septic System In gaper license in Orono before? �Most , recent year ] !SS 8. Have you ever had a license revoked? 6 When? Where? _ 4. Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-uds? Yes V, No SUBMITTALS REQUIRED: 1. $25.00 license application fee. 2. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be cccayted. 3. $10-50-100,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. .7'4. Copy of current MPCA Certificate or evidence of attendance at On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshop held immediately prior to current construction season. - WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED. - _LICENSES List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license �- .., •. ��i'ie a-f The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of Orono, Minnesota, for license to install and repair septic :1 systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws !� of the State of Orono. Minnesota and the ordinances of ) the City /of 'l Date <i-of-U..' Applicants Signature (7 'U.tt .i ✓!-�/f'� Staff recommendation Approval K_ Denial _ Date 7-Vs' .7lr CITY Reason for denial' _ USE City Council Action ❑ate Approv_ d _ Denied ONLY Date license mailed _- 1'u.t I If.., I�.. IA (AITT of OKUNO 6UI I. DING A ZONING, - 4737357 ASSESSING 7.1CLN. L III i:.I f: AT IUN All questions must be answered. License fee, bond, certificate of insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification or -Home Sewage Treatment Workshop attendance must accompany this application. All applications are subject t��vol1 a/qE �_ten ��(10) day approval " period. 1. Business or trade name /](CI NY 1N Wa x4"1 w4S*C 2. Business address U,�q) F,). LO 3. Business phone 47A-U343 Residence phone =-,gye43 <. Name of applicant or company representative holding MPCA � certification _Vu (llt(Earh.i/ 5. Type of certification held: Installer _X Pumper Site evaluator System designer Is this a Provisional Certificate? Certificate No. 6. If no Certificate is held, provide evidence of attendance at one of the On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshops held immediate prior to the current construction season. 7. Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? UrS Most recent year 'GPI,. S. Have you ever had a license revoked? hO When? Where? aua 1]-Xa b "WOla v: 1. $25.00 license application fee. �en,Q7✓2. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as e 1>c obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted. 1115van4 Vic. $10-50-100,000 minimum Certificate of insurance. Copy of current MPCA Certificate or evidence of attendance at On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshop held immediately - prior to current construction season. LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL. ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED. List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of Orono, Minnesota, for license to inetall and repair septic systems, and/or pump out septic tanks oubject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of Date Applicants Signature CITY Staff recommendation Approval V. Denial Date y USE Reason for denial: ONLY City Council Action Date Date license mailed License No. _ APPLICATION FOR SOLICITATION - $20.00 fee Date Received Date Expires CITY OF ORONO 1335 BROWN ROAD SOUTH BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 p Organization: �;uPhonee?3'Gf3`Z� Address: ♦ Bea .�2 w a Representative: _f'uIA(h,, t`� .Se OV .•J Phone SIt wP address: �,.—,g Check One: Business Solicitation �_ Contribution Solicitation Number of People Solicitating within the City 0 Provide list of Names of Solicitors on back of this application. Type of Product to be solicited r-.4 FloWroc ♦ &e((o".,c PERMIT EXPIRES 60 DAYS FROM APPROVAL DATE. POLICE CHIEF SHALL HAVE FIVE (5) BUSINESS DAYS IN WHICH TO INVESTIGATE AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION PURSUANT TO ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 5.30 SUBD 5(a). __________________________________________________________________________ ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON SOLICITORS Subd. 3. Prohibited Solicitation Practices. A. It is unlawful for any solicitor to engage in solicitation for any unlawful business or organizational purpose or activity. B. It is unlawful for any solicitor to practice harassment, nuisance, theft, deceit, or menacing, troublesome or otherwise unlawfu. activities during the course of solicitation. C. It is unlawful for any solicitor to enter, or attempt to gain entrance, to residential premises displaying at such entrance a sign with the words "Peddlers and Solicitors Prohibited" or "Solicitors Prohibited". D. It is unlawful for any solicitor to refuse to leave business premises when requested by the owner, leases, or person in charge thereof. E. It is unlawful for any person to engage in contribution solicitation without completion of licensing or registration herein provided. F. It is unlawful for any person toengage in but errs solicitation without a license as herein provided. __________________________________________________________________________ The undersigned hereby agrees to the conditions quoted above from the Orono Municipal Code and any additional requirements the City staff may have. Signature of Applicant: L,4,t %.. - Date: c{- 3- $h ______________________.-___________________________________________________ FOR CITY USE ONLY: After review of application, staff recommends the following: Approval of application _ De of ap lication Signature of City Official: Date: 77 'jf Signature of Police Chic[: ------.., -f C- Date: __________________________________________________________________________ CITY OF ONONO License Ycar P.O. Box 66 _9 ft,Itc Poro V"d TTT }f (,- Crystal Bay, MN 55323i i'i 1'c, Fai,i 1�� per, •(JZJ I i.ils nr� 473-7357 7�Y i GARBAGE a-it1HpUSB-COLLECTOR'S LICENSE APPLICATION The undersigned wishes to operate the indicated business in the City of Orono and herewith makes application for a license to do so. Business/Firs te) .(Zip Business Phone Number 472-3392 Applicant's Name Address I155_! 0 Phone Number 472-2977 Check One: Individual y Partnership Corporation Number of Vehicles to be used in Orono 3 Description of Vehicles (attached list if more) Loaded Loaded Year Mfgr. Gross wt. Rear Axle wt. Size/Yards License Number 1976 1t;CK 56,000 34,000 _ 25 yd.6. VX 17204 1911 ).(ACK _ " YX 17205 1993 RACK YX 17122 General area of City served Aft nt Onam orrvpt natth of Fox St. Schedule of Collection charges/ dates 9 50 o n month Approximate number of customers in Orono Location of dumping area to ' itte LAndAitt __________________________________________________________________________ IN ORDER FOR IBIS APPLICATION TO BE COMPLETE, YOU MUST EMCLOSE TBE FOLLOWING: Surety bond in the amount of $1,000. Proof of insurance in the amount of $100,000-5300,000-$50,000, and 10-day cancellation clause. Annual fee is a $30.00 flat rate fee, plus $15/truck, ands $30.00 transfer fee (if applicable). __________________________________________________________________________ I am the owne_ end operator of the above business and I have paid all license fees and taxes rr q.0 rirre'd by law. The above information is correct. / `V.4'�C�✓7Lz54i- -�CD'c-L'`--4/_ %- �n. MiI3 1915 App -cant ' ^Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------- TV USE M Yj After review of application, staff recosatends: Appr va Denial Other (specify) Vprgn Vt re —,T Ofyrcilhl Date �_�G CITY OF O66 DatenPC Yca Z_ P.O. Box 06 Date Rec ivrd Crystal hay, MN 55323 Fce Paid �� I,it als ns%I 473-7357 /'yam GARBAGE L REFUSE COLLECTOR'S LICENSE APP. ATTON The undersigned wishes to operate the indicated business in the City of Orono and herewith 'hakes application ,for pa license to do so. Busineus/Firs /� w...�.!. .di.w. iw.. J y Business Phone Number Applican Address ,phone Number V79- IY47 ._ Check One: Individual Partnership _X Corporation Number of vehicles to be used in Orono Description of Vehicles (attached list if more): Loaded Loaded Year Nfgr. Gross Wt. Rear Axle Wt. size/Yards License Nunber $ /O'/ A179 ,39ao 4MOVV — R V9 7732/ . &A?O %977 390so_ e?aoso _1 1 11,e_ 73.12 General area of City served uy[ --// Schedule ok ^ollection charges/ dates /Q �ePA, /A Approximate number of customers jinn Orono o 30"m Location of dumping area , -__ ........... ________________ _.______FOLLOW___ IN ORDER FOR TEIS APPLI TION TO ijE-COMPLETE: YOU MUST ENCLOSE THE POLLfri'ING: O Surety bond in the amount of $1,000 Proof of insurance in the amount of $100,000-$300,000-$50,000, and 10-day cancellation clause. Annual fee is $30.00 flat rate fee, plus $15/truck, and a $30.00 transfer fee (if applicable). _________________________________________________________.._________________ I am the owner a o e_ralos')of the above business and I have paid feef and taxes r u:r y law. The above information is correct. _ A/- App :cant Data __________________________________________________________________________ FOR CITY USE ONLY: After review of application, staff recommends: Ap oval De.iial Other (specify) 4 #i -Q(e . :qna tS ure of Official Date CITY Ofl OROI+J II 70�T l.� T E�D-40 NA."E )I0 P A Y I GROSS ;R3SS ClP/ALLDJ ANOCAS04 -' [ 3l 9904096 1250.54 BERNHARRSO 12 11846.24 1692.12 RORZIEN ry 31 5266.eS 412.25 BOSMA JL 12 B54.00 S96.0O BRINER CA 90 0.00 0.00 BRINKHAUS JF 42 8719.11 1191.36 BURMASTER KO 31 9344.30 1336.72 CARLSON NJ 92 8446.J0 1180086 CHECK JM 90 0.00 0.00 CHESNTCK GB 31 9252.75 IS16.56 CLARK RP 31 5558023 759.64 CORNICK JL 31 5966.10 1215.74 EDMUNiM P 90 0.00 0.00 EHREN :9G OL 90 2388.43 304.61 ENGLI"1 11 IH 31 7214.48 1215.56 ERICY 1,3N OJ 93 0000 0.00 ERIC'1SON KR 31 10155.62 1364*69 FRITILER JM 31 8959010 1204.08 GAFTRON MP 33 7374.12 1754.89 GALLO DE 93 0.00 3.00 GERHARDSON JR 42 10586.38 1514.40 GREGORY JO 42 1587.25 ICO/.O4 MALLIII 04 12 6000008 858.32 MANSEN SC 02 6651012 906.13 HANSING CJ 31. 2393.45 286.32 HENNING JP 90 O.QO 0.00 HENSEL MM 31 5104.10 477.42 MIOU5 PA 90 2354*02 335.25 JACOBS TJ 33 YO85.55 1013.60 JOHNS RJ 90 0.00 0.00 JOHNSON RP 31 8761094 1204,09 KILNO HH 31 10796.08 1544040 Y';-r,TC1uK H 71 9015.54 1206,38 ALACR5 A8 12 1072,35 64.0 KN6 TSON CA IS 5060.70 726.R0 KA1MMfL DL 93 0000 D.00 KRUEGER JA 90 267.75 155.25 KUCHN TM 15 9786.11 1399.�2 LATTIM JC 15 6D00.09 4155,32 MAHUST4 JA 13 A966.81 1282.72 MANUEL CM 90 1-428.00 61.50 MCGONA,, LR 30 7360.64 1351.)2 MOROYCZYNS J 31 1073lo SS 1260.52 MRO SS FT 61 5822*13 741.'.0 NAA9 IL 12 3928.22 0.".0 W 00 93 0.00 O.LO 0149N LE 31 3110.06 ',5".20 PALMER PB 31 0.00 0.00 PEARSON bC it l0332.A2 5.00 PCTER'ON PL 12 3307.36 ,05.i2 PLTERSON RN i3 0.00 3.30 frA nNG fI CITY OF ORONU P A Y R N N NAME !)IV GROSS SRTSS ErP/ALLOa PROVO RJ 12 0.00 0.00 OUAST VA 92 7L40.57 954.89 ROLF DJ i0 407.25 0.00 RUT^RAFT GE 93 D•DO 0.00 SASS JJ 42 4837058 90R•16 SELLNER CL 93 0.00 0.00 SELSTAD ER 93 0.00 0.00 SIEVERS RC 90 390.00 115.00 SKREEN DS 02 6313.29 912.29 SLIGO SR 93 0.00 D•00 SMITH JR 92 6919.59 1051.2A STEFFENHAG RE 93 7066.77 1311.20 STEVENS qG 93 0.00 0.00 THIES OR 70 952.50 I42.50 TNOMTON MR 31 •162.50 159•84 T0MCZYK MY 31 9469.32 1237.94 NOTTCKF SM 31 0.00 0.00 COUNT GRAND 1#39065.3C &AID 00047 TOTAL 00068 TOTAL TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS = 2ZOO62.6♦ EMPLOYERS FICA A = GROUP HChLfM 0 = PHYSICIANAt HEALTH PLAN OLUE CROSSYBLUE SHIELD D = MEDICAL CENTER PLAN E = PPUOEATIAL F = C00M,",. HEALTH CANE G = MINNESOTA HMO H = TPAKS-AMERICA OCC• I = BANKERS LIFE J = MUTUAL CERVICES K = MUTUAL OF INAMR L = EMPLOTEFAS 9ENEFIT M = AETNA N = NICOLIf:T EITCL 0 = Lf'.AGUE OF CITIES 2 = HEALTH CAR' MAINT ACCT• CITY OF ORONO P A Y EMRL-N6 NAME )IV GROSS GRJSS EAP/ALLOT ANDERSON BL 31 619^009 1287*D4 HERNHARDSO ME I,. 8461060 L692o32 805ZIEN SA 31 3682.82 733.30 8OSMA JL 12 129o00 129000 BRINER CA 90 0000 come BRINKHAUS JF 02 621To09 IL91036 BURMASTER NO 31 6670006 1336oF2 CARLSON NJ 92 6165o04 IIO0o98 CHECK JM 9D 0000 0000 CHESWICK GO 31 6619,63 1316oS6 CLARK SP 31 3531,82 168ot7 CORNICK JL 31 3779099 775009 EOMUNOS P 90 0000 DODD EHRENBERG DL 90 1758044 276o92 ENGLISH 11 IH 31 ♦638o39 9S6039 ERICKSON UJ 93 0000 Dome ERICKSON KR 31 1100031 1562*83 FRITZLER JM 31 6L39oTO 1169060 GAFFRON MP 33 5261035 1054098 GALLO DE 93 0000 logo GERHARDSON JR 42 75510SB 1519o10 GREGOR% JO 42 5544086 1139621 HALLIN OR 12 4Zm3066 85$o32 HANSEN SC •2 0826*78 900016 HANSING CJ 31 1173*74 326008 HENNING JP 90 0000 0000 HENSEL MR 51 I182020 F36olO HIGUS PA 90 16b3o52 291052 JACOBS TJ 33 5:53035 1013060 JOHNS Rw 90 000n D000 JUHNSOM MP 31 6366026 1173o93 KILBO MH 31 7F0F021 1540040 KIRNYCZUK M 31 6139070 122Fo91 KLAERS AS 12 963080 1Tbo30 KNUTSON CA 15 3621*10 726090 KRIMMEL OL 93 0000 0030 KUEHN IN 15 6986027 1399o92 LATTIN JC 15 4203045 MSlo32 MADUSTH JA 33 6401o37 1282J2 MANUEL CN 90 1237,63 190oA0 MCGONAN LR 90 5257*60 10S1052 MORONCZYNS J 31 6917053 12990SS MROSS FT 61 ♦236o9S 191060 NAAH TL 12 3273o SO 654o72 0AS 70 93 Gomm 0000 OMAN LE 33 1981056 32076 PALMER PB 51 D00D 0000 PEARSON SC 31 6922o7♦ 1357058 PETERSON PL 12 223604 52602• PETERSON RN 93 0600 1090 PROVO HJ 12 0000 DODO CITY OF 040NO P A V A Y-T-D • - - - - - ENPL NO NAME DIV GROSS GRDSS EKP/ALLOY OUAST NA 92 5183.0T 1229w N1 ROLF DJ 90 407w25 12000 ROTCRAFT GE 93 0.00 0000 SASS JJ 42 4976w40 909w16 SELLMFR CL 93 0.68 1.00 SELSTAO ER 93 Oleo 0.00 SIEVERS RC 90 200.00 15030 SKREEN DS 92 4938.36 .j3w63 SL160 SR 93 Oleo 0.00 SMITH JR 92 *912.67 1003.A7 STEFFENNA6 RE 93 5046.37 1011w20 STEVENS 86 93 0.00 Owes THIES OR 90 690 00 155000 THONTON MR 31 2529*85 791w90 TOMCZVK MW 31 6686.36 1227.94 VOYTCKE SM 31 Oleo Oleo COUNT GRAND •36764,64 •A70 00049 TOTAL 00067 TOTAL TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS = 229536*22 EMPLOYERS FIC A = GROUP HEALTH 8 = PPTSICIAM•S HEALTH PLAN C = BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD 0 = MEDICAL CENTER PLAN E = PRUDENTIAL F = COORD• HEALTH CARE 6 = MINMESOTA 1480 N = TRANS-AMERI.A OCC. I = BANKERS LIFE J = NUIUAL SERVICES K = MUTUAL OF ONAMA L = EMPLOTEE'S BENEFIT R = RE INA N = NICOLLET EITEL 0 _ LEAOUE OF CITIES Z = HEALTH CARE MAIVT ACCT. jig PAY: GROSS GROSS EXPIALL34 OL 31 B654802 2163853 ME 12 10153892 1692832 SA 31 445686D 175878 JL 12 ♦38800 309*00 CA 90 D.00 DOD0 JF 42 1527875 1.33871 ND SI BJ07858 1336872 NJ 92 7265*92 1183888 JM 90 0800 3800 GS 31 7336819 1316856 SP 31 4198*39 966857 JL 31 47T0836 993837 P 30 0800 9800 DL 30 20B3892 523838 TH $1 5999,62 1563,23 DJ 33 0800 0800 MR 3l 877089� 1626855 JN 31 I755802 1615852 MP SS 6319823 1354_98 DE 93 GOOD 3830 JR 42 9311,98 151, 40 JD 42 6590821 113,.35 ON 12 5141.76 35de32 SC 42 5750639 923869 CJ 31 2107843 333869 JP 90 0800 3800 MN 51 4126*88 91486E PA 93 2018877 335825 TJ 33 6071095 1013260 RJ 90 0800 GOOD SP S1 1557886 1491*61 RH 31 9251868 1544*40 M 31 78118416 1611876 AB 12 1003855 139875 CA 15 1353890 726880 OL 93 DODO DODO JA 90 112850 I12850 TM 15 5386019 1393892 JC IS 5141077 859852 JA 33 7684809 1282872 CM 90 1366,40 12%,80 Lit 90 6309*12 1091.52 J 31 9470883 ZSS3833 FT 6l 5040*53 R03856 TL l2 3928822 6872 Jo 93 ^ 10 0800 LE 33 245 ,6 51383D PB 31 0800 08D0 SC 31 10332.82 1286863 PL 12 28D1844 164873 RY 43 0800 J033 CITY OF ORONO P A Y R EM�L-NO I-T-3 • -- - - - - NAME )IV GROSS GR3SS EKP/ALLOY PROVO DJ 12 0000 D.OD OUAST NA 92 6165.69 1002.62 ROLF DJ 30 407.25 3.3D ROYCRAFT GE 93 0000 0.00 SASS JJ 02 5333.92 355.02 SELLNER CL 33 0000 1.00 SELSTAO ER 33 0.00 3.30 SIEVERS RC 90 275.00 75000 SKREEN OS 02 5901.00 962.63 SL160 SR 93 0000 D.00 SMITH JR 92 5868*35 955.69 SIEFFENHAG RE 93 6037.57 1D11.20 STEVENS O6 93 0000 0.00 THIES OR 90 910.00 120.30 TMONTON MR 31 3302.66 R72.31 TOMCZYK MY 31. 823L•30 15.5.03 YOYTCKE SM 31 0.00 0.00 COUNT GRAND 19.236.19 t 'AID 00369 cry OF DRONO l tAl•NO NAME l �EARSON I COUNT GRANU 60001 TOTAL ]I i A K 3 Y R I T 0---PT 6133G GROSS Er S. 0031 9016.13 2623.39 N = TRANS-AMERI:A O:C. I = BANKERS LIFE J _ MUTUAL SERVICES K c MUTUAL OF 34A44 L = EMPLO:CE•S 6ENErIT M = AETNA N c NICOLL'' EIT_L 0 = LEAGUE OF :IfIES Z NC ALT l 44141 AGC". 29623.39 CITY OFORONO P A Y R 0 // Ag. QAL ` a"Ne, L Y-T-3 • - - - - - - . EAML-NO NAME )IV GROSS GROSS EKP/ALLOY r ADAMS T 11 480.00 22300 BUTLER MC 11 1100.00 21SeCO I FRA4M T 11 R80.00 220.00 CRABEK U 11 580.00 22D.00 HAMMEREL U 11 430.00 22D.00 COUNT GRAND I9155.00 PAID 00005 TOTAL 00005 TOTAL TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS = 003 EMPLOYERS FICA A = GROUP HEALTH R = PHYSICIANAS HEALTH PLAN C = BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD D = MEDICAL CENTER ?LAN E = PRUDENTIAL i F = COORD. HEALTH CARE G = MINNESOTA IND H = TRANS-AMERICA OCC. I = BANKERS LIFE O = MUTUAL SERYIC_S K = MUTUAL OF DRAMA L = EMPLOYEE'S MENEFIT M = AETNA N = NICOLLET EITEL 0 = LEAGUE OF CITIES 2 = HEALTH CARE RAINT ACCT. MISSING MOSP CO3E FOR SOME EMPLIS 1156 :IVY OF ORONO • ;IE:1 43. DATE • JSS236 63/21/86 assess 93/21/56 733116 03/21/66 • 393016 03/21/66 OSSD26 03123/86 asset* 43121/N r estate 03/21/26 19323. 93/21/96 :10036 US/ZI/96 • as3006 et/}1/34, 013846 83/21/66 assess 0312t/06 • 833036 OS/21/96 09300% '93121186 013636 03/21/I6 • 033006 03/21/A6 • u.u• /93814 03/21/46 • 033014 03/21/96 assets e3/2t/96 • 0,3221 03121/46 0S3027 03/21/56 • 093129 03121186 • J35333 03/2//86 assess 03/21/96 393,11 03/21/64 r a33251 OS/21116 DA3931 03121/96 w 3+3039 83/21/96 r 13t.I3 13105 132.rs- 69.51- 69.11 69.51 51.50 23.16 25.09- 63.09 109.61 27.33 2/.I3 2r.33- 66.31 25.10 SSS.JA 319.•1 393.93 +T6.H 25.19 2S.11 . t. ?to. Is .)t- S.?IS.FS 100.20 1 a2.2r 1 .9) 2.r0 a.3e .la 9a s.ls l e.r2 !.2) :4c.l 116I6I:0 IEI300 IfE1 ): is it rirOw A:RS-R1Yvt ISTa INC e°•I-' 50PPL1:3 A:H-wI ONE SOT% INC fr�V439E ACV-OIvOEtOTS IQ I:L:•ISIE A:ae-wl"tiara INC F:LE••9eE AC AD•wI YYEIDIA INC 9•FICE SW JrS A:•0-wIv1T&9T4 INC TEL'_•wOYE A:R1-RI Wier& 11C 9-FI:t SOrrLI"S A:Re-41YYCSOr• INC TELE•49%E A:42-RIVN SOT& NC I E.aNE A:R)-w/UCi efA INC 0"I.: suwrL its A c•D-wtYRfOT& INC 9=FICi SO"LILS 4:40-41 W1614 INC F:L"IDIE A:Q2-R11YtI0lA INC :•FILE SOIILits L'a/-wI YYE;OIa I1c FEIE•UVE A:RS-Mlgw.0I4 INC 3- i:_ suwwltCs A:aO-w1YVE391A INC Rt NI lt•rlic; A_L 1164 EJ:TaI: NOT 0_3st"05 ALL STAR E.tQatC ANT 40199f OLT A%EAt CAY LINEN of 1_36/643s A29LE IALCI 43ESCI 34A1 Swap gas A-Pti WALLLI a:EVCr 314t $•!• to - as 6AT•1NT&3 4531 :SP/i: U9lt AI 6 T two SISTER F:L"43%E AT 6 I TWO SISTER IELE•401- at a I c3 tELi•491E At a 1 CASH! TEA:. qV[ AT a T COMMIT TELE•0W AVOEMA-04 0C: :39-11:49013 it-to-s6 9LL[ l ACC3UVT 16. i•I. a ..3. V .(%$ i 61-•}le-Ill-lt 01-aris-N9-12 n-•ru-ea+-u n-•2u-931-t• 11-•}39ro]f-1• 91-1119-+]+-I• 91-•rle-t61-1! tl-•2H-eT1-I i 91-all+-111-1/ s1-mr121-n el-•219-Ira-31 u-•2u-1 n- s. 13-a 2t Fl Ir!• u-•219-1 TrN n-•zu-z•+-•+ al-a2)1-1H-1r 21-•t.r1z+-v I±-• S•S-xt+l 11-1311-313-10 Il-• )11-SI r+e n-•/tent,-+1 12-43x-549-11 12-4329-3.9-91 13-4324-56/-12 01-1329-359-11 41-4321-229-31 91-4320-Ir1-33 I-•sx-us-u --"a 1156 :IVY OF ORONO • ;IE:1 43. DATE • JSS236 63/21/86 assess 93/21/56 733116 03/21/66 • 393016 03/21/66 OSSD26 03123/86 asset* 43121/N r estate 03/21/26 19323. 93/21/96 :10036 US/ZI/96 • as3006 et/}1/34, 013846 83/21/66 assess 0312t/06 • 833036 OS/21/96 09300% '93121186 013636 03/21/I6 • 033006 03/21/A6 • u.u• /93814 03/21/46 • 033014 03/21/96 assets e3/2t/96 • 0,3221 03121/46 0S3027 03/21/56 • 093129 03121186 • J35333 03/2//86 assess 03/21/96 393,11 03/21/64 r a33251 OS/21116 DA3931 03121/96 w 3+3039 83/21/96 r 13t.I3 13105 132.rs- 69.51- 69.11 69.51 51.50 23.16 25.09- 63.09 109.61 27.33 2/.I3 2r.33- 66.31 25.10 SSS.JA 319.•1 393.93 +T6.H 25.19 2S.11 . t. ?to. Is .)t- S.?IS.FS 100.20 1 a2.2r 1 .9) 2.r0 a.3e .la 9a s.ls l e.r2 !.2) :4c.l 116I6I:0 IEI300 IfE1 ): is it rirOw A:RS-R1Yvt ISTa INC e°•I-' 50PPL1:3 A:H-wI ONE SOT% INC fr�V439E ACV-OIvOEtOTS IQ I:L:•ISIE A:ae-wl"tiara INC F:LE••9eE AC AD•wI YYEIDIA INC 9•FICE SW JrS A:•0-wIv1T&9T4 INC TEL'_•wOYE A:R1-RI Wier& 11C 9-FI:t SOrrLI"S A:Re-41YYCSOr• INC TELE•49%E A:42-RIVN SOT& NC I E.aNE A:R)-w/UCi efA INC 0"I.: suwrL its A c•D-wtYRfOT& INC 9=FICi SO"LILS 4:40-41 W1614 INC F:L"IDIE A:Q2-R11YtI0lA INC :•FILE SOIILits L'a/-wI YYE;OIa I1c FEIE•UVE A:RS-Mlgw.0I4 INC 3- i:_ suwwltCs A:aO-w1YVE391A INC Rt NI lt•rlic; A_L 1164 EJ:TaI: NOT 0_3st"05 ALL STAR E.tQatC ANT 40199f OLT A%EAt CAY LINEN of 1_36/643s A29LE IALCI 43ESCI 34A1 Swap gas A-Pti WALLLI a:EVCr 314t $•!• to - as 6AT•1NT&3 4531 :SP/i: U9lt AI 6 T two SISTER F:L"43%E AT 6 I TWO SISTER IELE•401- at a I c3 tELi•491E At a 1 CASH! TEA:. qV[ AT a T COMMIT TELE•0W AVOEMA-04 0C: :39-11:49013 it-to-s6 9LL[ l ACC3UVT 16. i•I. a ..3. V .(%$ i 61-•}le-Ill-lt 01-aris-N9-12 n-•ru-ea+-u n-•2u-931-t• 11-•}39ro]f-1• 91-1119-+]+-I• 91-•rle-t61-1! tl-•2H-eT1-I i 91-all+-111-1/ s1-mr121-n el-•219-Ira-31 u-•2u-1 n- s. 13-a 2t Fl Ir!• u-•219-1 TrN n-•zu-z•+-•+ al-a2)1-1H-1r 21-•t.r1z+-v I±-• S•S-xt+l 11-1311-313-10 Il-• )11-SI r+e n-•/tent,-+1 12-43x-549-11 12-4329-3.9-91 13-4324-56/-12 01-1329-359-11 41-4321-229-31 91-4320-Ir1-33 I-•sx-us-u --"a 1 nee -III OF ORONO :NE:t 319IAT:N as-±•-N. •..E • :<:a W. OATE .9OWR fUDO4 I(E1 )tsCtl PTIJ1 ACC3WT 40. INN. • r. J. 9 4Ef3AIL 030i5 0312156 53.10 E-4:404IAN A I315 Not 4.3J1t405 01-4313-.99-'• 0130-5 03/21196 76.D0 tl_fC<Ol of • fONi 44t 8_39/440i II-t H•-irr i. 0 SS091 05/21/e6 56.15 9tOI1 • DIP -LIES 31 DnHI 03fx1/Ai OfOJO -"I) 3!-•LiCf tl61-•4•2111►--121--n • 56.15 ...-CGL •..••• 63385 03121/96 13. . OSEI Pat;PUN-N1L 91-432E-110-5 .e3Cf5 03/2V96 3.09 56 BlDIEI ►RTi PtT )/-AL II-4322-113-34 • 1 Le0 •••-CN5 •..••• 015331 03/211 e6 9.49 IJT YCf IAI Sl>•LT 11a a84;4 11-H2O-I15-96 _ 91.41 ....Ca . H SllO 03/21/96 36.$S (Ae_ POWER a EOJIP EJi V1-of ACCESS OT-l232-211-4J 39.5% 11311: 0312L/96 3.53 CLAWSRIAO ]34-Ii:430Lsoa II-1S36-129-31 3.55 . 913124 03/21/66 12.30 COCA CILA E)O1- T:1TAL n3121 D]/21/A6 12.30 ti%3119 COCA CILA IEN311G •:at[- IE1T1L M-91 11-4331-515-90 033124 03/21/44 COCA COLA fEU1NG RIOT{. Ii-1131-513-9D H SI24 OS/11/06 55.10 165.10 COCA ELLS fEO 1NG :A Rla -JI:N II-H2O-5t S-19 16S.ID la CR D33139 93/21/66 :04.37 CXOIIAL LIFE INS :3 1EILT4 INS 01-4LS1-121-31 Mass 03121196 7103 CDLOOIIL 4FE INS :0 NEAL14 IRS 01-4I31-I26-31 033135 03/2L/96 15.00 COLO1nL LIFE INS :0 NEALT4 INS 21-4151-929-31 No 142.ID 043131 03/21/86 381.10 C)N4E9:IAL BUS 1NT JtNlf2tl AL SER/ 91-4141070-17 Mass 03/21f06 223.60 C01ME1:IAL 9L)D 41T Jt4n Dn AL 3CaN OI-1311-121-)t 0 611.S0 9f3L4t 93/21/I6 121.99 Coll 00 H IN: IR• SJP-LIED I1-4216-12Y31 1/1.99 Ifis C111 OF OROY3 I a E:< Y:. AlE ONJUYI • ]alas 33/11/96 I ?41. 52 0331S3 03/21/66 22.10- 1.225.52 03119,E6 30.16 V9356 03/21186 29.56 A 011ie? 3/2186 940.10 J40 316i !/21/B6 10.s0- � 9se.so ...... AN, 033139 as/2l/S6 3.434.00 A t• 033254 03/21/s6 5.49 333254 O3/11/86 St..E OS325s 03/21/86 S.If • 013254 03/21/86 19.06 033=54 03/21/86 2L.11 t9.ts . • • 3132t2 03/21/96 138.30 013222 03121/8, 15.33 335221 03/21/86 43.10 3532rz 03/21/86 55.40 03222 03/22/64 2fh61 815212 03/21/96 6.49 33I212 03121/66 0.29 9952YR C3121106 61.t0 193272 83/21/86 V.ii OLS'.12 03/21/61 i.50 03SLR 03/21/60 11.36 352.29 t • Jf 3221 03/21,86 69.115 43327f 03/21/56 6-.IS 0332ft 03/21/66 1A9.I2 • 013222 03/21/66 0.95 0d327t 03121/04 146.01 0432rr 031WA6 z92.12 • 1132rr 03/21/96 69.25 .NEC( AE:1S1EA IE0308 IIER 1}01PILON ON )I914130TOls CJ iEV -Ji:e DAr 311TRIIJSIr CO 90I R:I ls•t.-Bw Pbt � LY JJ YI N0. 1%0. • •.a. • RE:.", n-4•ls-as-90 n-4e16-vs-se E4GLE 1I5/4I3JfiV6 L13 •14:4 1:-4f10-515-H ELK': DI5TRI4JTING L13 )ISC 11-4511-S1S-90 ELSE SIDE SEYERA6C 3-E4 -i4co PI-4415-SIS-SJ ENS( SIDE SEVE446E 531 REf rl-9916-a15-19 43LP E ERI:RS31 ASSESSl46 ;DERV 0'-4381-65f-L4 SEW 44-. RE-614 S0 EOJIaf-TS/4C:ES5 01-4212-129-31 S.-W4Z RE -AIR SV ' SDI PPPI S/ACCCSS 61-4212-249-62 6ERE44L ME -AIR SW Eaut-f-IS/ACC_SS 81-4212-211-11 GERE44L RE-41R SI E3Yfa/af SIACCESS P2-6232-549-91 G EMEUL ACaAN SY E2J[a/a1514CL•SS 13-41S2-S69-92 6 a ( SERVICES ]LINTY) 21-42`1- 11-42 6 \ ( ita RCES SI Nit Sip Ol-4I4S-t 49-tt G a ( SERVICES 40r 90SIG4Ds 3I-43.3-0f9-11 6 a E SERVICES 40r AL36/GROS 11-4303-129-51 9 a t SCRIPT CES :LVH106 r2-4221-549-91 G a 4 SERVICES aru if& Mr sw R-6734-549-91 6 a t SERVICES 'It SL361WDS t2-4343-349-91 6 a 4 SERVICES CLOP Ri RS is-422l-sag-r S a t SERYtEi Jrl, Its ROT iw 13-4234-561-92 G a 4 SERVt CES Rif 4L3L/aROS rS-4S41-56Y92 6 a 4 SERVICES :Ltr4R6 74-e221-590-93 NEJ :14 W%LT4 :tRE 0EAL14 INS 01-49st-439-lz RC0 :Tt NE\LM C18E MEALfN INS 11-4151-06t15 NEO CIA NEWN CARE 0E4LfN INS 11-4151-121-31 NE0 :It NELLIN CARE 4EALf4 IRS 11-41st-126-31 0E4 'It NE\Lf9 CAME 4EAL14 INS 91-4151-I94.53 RE9 :It NE41.14 :%RE 441I4 IR6 01-41SI-249-42 N:D :It NE4LIA CARE A--ALfN INS fl-4151-519-90 ...-CR: 1416 :ITT or ORONO :NCCt ai613174 �S•I♦-6e ./6L • N). Y![ \NNI IC GOON IlCN )C3CR PITON 1_C OJYI W. 1YY. / •.0. / 113f31N • 3f)217 01/21/66 SR.H 1-3 :It NCR 14 :ARE 4C11Lf4 /43 12-•Ial-iN-11 0132i) 03/21/56 O7.61 PLO :(1 REAL14 :QC R±6L91 IRS rf-6151_56 -91 1,335.1• • .u..• u.Ka4 • 0f32i1 43/21186 610.11 Miq C(O C4IE'3 •I1: :11'TI:400L3 11-43%-12I-11 .16.10 • •.•e• •..-C63 $53185 63/2IIRS S.16 NEAR C!O D:.l FAR .121asE 21-Otl-O.a-1! • S.16 . •u o• ..._tlS • 333SIS CS/21166 539.31 PENN CIO S4E1I.1 0•1 MI. :ROES U-•Se1-0 N-16 $39.91 • • OU Is] W21/66 71.32 1-46 RCINRR! :at, tat Ertl t2 3/vfi 61-41.0-339-12 913344 E312//r6 SS.30 IIFL :a Of •3- IIit SI.EN160CLS 01-4 •:-12>-31 • 35.00 • 3531:6 03/2I/06 1f2.15 JOM SDN rOLi LO I'Ji Rlr tt• 61-u11-600-3T »t.ls . AN ...... ...-cas • 013115 C4/12/46 bl! 9E6F.lrs Ot36 6:r SP•LIES 01-i210-IH-31 a23315 03121/s6 ll.sa aELNENr3 OR" 0>1 W-LILt OlKTl0-V1-SS 22.31 • uu.• •••-Ca; • 011 ]1( 03/71/96 3r.12 NJE4N-IN01•S Rti:t-f IYL-RILE O/-•3/1-661-1i 0131)a D3121166 is NJENN-(NONtt RR114-t4WL-NSL6 TT-6341-S61-91 253311 93/21116 1 6JE44-IMMS NtR N-H YL-RILE Ol-U11-%M12 • •.. I • N5402 031ZI186 2.I61J0 LRNERTCA Utl USE •LRERIEtfNP 2 Orr 2a-4366-626-ll 2,241.69 • • Of Hf• 03/2115. I0I.S6 (aC LNKER .1151-JIL 01-6322-020-11 life cI IT Of ORONO :ACI RE6ISTE4 I3-21-R. To :1-:5 no. LIE I.)J.1 fEICOR IfEI IESCRIOTIOR 6CCOYOT OJ, 1". 9 0.3. 0 MEI..6! At liS1)I 05/17/96 13.52 TIE LACER OATSf•SIL 01-4322-IZS-31 05510. 0312119, 53.32 fAF LACER 141Sf•JSL 11-6322-515-16 zu.Ie . 39 S/Si OS/2I1ab 166.13 LOW LA AID IRACTN EAJVI•TS/MCCESS 01-6232-249-42 106.i3 OS3062 03/21196 1.61A.)i MARK all W $I A-EI .ARCM F1-6015-S1S-90 OS3060 03/21/96 92.41- MIRK all Olal 60T 4-T 11-4ali-513-96 I.S26.55 � uu.. u•.C[3 OSSNI U3/21/86 14,312.16 A-T99 PAST_ CAUSAL M6::-VILL 1S-129. a00-66 14.312.1% o u.. •••-[aS • 325065 03/21/86 29.10 AILS OATGEI CO 491 *IS: EA01/ 01-6312-161-11 ZI.L3 . A OSINO 03/21/36 114.10 RINNEGASCC ill -[TICS OI-.SP-Oil-IJ 910.10 313300 03/21/96 110.32 Him" c6R0 All RCS: EAOIO 01-1341-129J5 • -C<f •u.0 • 053526 03/21/66 50.)0 MINI SILT LSSI WRIE93610 10-4390-590-93 50.11 . � ..«Can .....• 05 03/21/96 262.53 MARTIN $ALI $f All SIN, 81-0233-249-02 262.53 . ��•�•• ••9-CRS OISSSI 03/21166 239.)3 CITE Gr MINaE991STA TIE.- 3110 CASES 71-1311-119-42 201.10 • H )133 05/2I186 13T1.13 CITa A' owns/CIE fE0 2W NA 02-0311-13242 1212.SH.0 Ill. :111 OF ONO.) • : 1;:< 00. OSlE 440104l • 091535 03/21/46 55.0 55.00 • 01354¢ 03121194 642.40 642.40 • uuu OS3556 03/21/36 1.30 • 353559 03/21186 36.30 OS3553 a3/21/46 4.09 45.30 • 053559 031211" 929.62 353559 03/21/66 19S.50 0415f3 03/21/86 1./40.1) • 053550 03/21/06 159.19 333559 0312114, 6.50 1,395.50 • u.u• • O3)Sbf O3/21/66 3S.S0 3t3965 03/21/66 19.50 015565 03/21/86 20.12 • 335565 03121/6. S1.1s 033565 03/:1/96 12.45 053S63 03121186 21.79 • 31350 03/21/86 16.51 035564 OD/21/66 32.20 O95564 03/21/86 21.16 • 236.35 33SS24 35/21,86 15e.00 130.00 • 9SIS9F 03/21/86 62.39 0•159F 03/21/66 3.09 953592 03/21/86 7.91 033591 03/21/96 103.53 651591 03/21/94 f.Sb 0633t2 83/21/66 1. 3 to." 093301 O3/21/86 05.14 s33i9f 03/21/86 291.42 06359I 03,21154 $39.31 023597 031211" 166.50 :MEa 4it SI.4 IEIODR I1:4 ): iC 5IP116M .T94 R:FRIS/t: 49T f_)i/N JS C3-I.-.. ✓4,1 S[COJRT •0. 169. 4 •.]. . 4ES.Sbi II-4.3.3-513.90 RJUICY tic W 415: EWIP I>-•HI-a41-11 YE LS)N EbT:6PtISEs 'Is PJt:• 11-4410-SIS-+0 YILS311 EYT:RP4l SES JIM: PJSCM 11-4812-SIS-94 ■ELSSS ENTEMISES S_Et PJ4:4 11-4935-S1S-90 IT3• VIILMES 01-431 .-42 MSP VTItift-3 It-43. -99 ESP YTILIFI:S 12-4324-_.9-11 MSP JIILEIIES 13-4324-519-92 MSP VFI.111:3 I3-4324-549-12 Y35FSJESTEtN SILL FZLE.RCIE 61-4322-t29-3I MORF UESI EfM 3E1L CL: HOPE 01-4)20-149-.2 MORF4V:STEIN SELL )III •43CE:SIM4 01-435S-069-1$ M ]SN YE STEIN 3ELL I.L:P409L 11-0320-SIS-.0 YORT•M:bTEIN SELL 43C M31E6 11-4323-SIS-96 M01140-STEIY 3ELL I:L71434E 12-4320-549-91 MORT V-STEIN Y LL )4T% .R3CESSLk6 12-4355-S49-91 034TSY:STLIN 3ELL 1EL:•434E I5-4526-US-92 Y J9NY: STEIN 9:LL 7iT4 •gCESSIMs 11-0355-569-92 O-F10E PRO) IF 91 :31-lSC400LS 01-4156-JJ9-12 PJSLIC EMP_ S:f SSSN --it 2R4 TO 519166 01-4141-939-12 PJSLIC EML R.I SSSN PEII 2/21 TO 3/9/S6 91-4141-640-13 PJSLIC ERR'- SET SSSN PEt4 T/z0 TO 309/86 21-0141-659-14 PJSLIC EM_ R_I LSSN -:At 2124 To 1H/16 Ot-4141-069-15 PJSLIC ERP. LEI LSSN KRt 1/14 t0 I/9/66 41-4141-01Ylf PJSLIC ERP- REY LSSN P:4L z/z4 To 1/046 at-4141-111-11 PJSLIC EMPL RET SSSN P-24 ff2• TO 3/9146 01-4141-115-3L PJSLIC EMPL SET SSSN 1E61 2/24 » 3/9/96 U-6141-12I-31 PJSLIC EPPL REI SSSN PEGS 2/14 TO 3/9/66 01-4141-126-31 PJSLIC EMi SET 4950 P.44 PTz4 TO 31W46 01-4141-114-33 •..-GNS :9lL :111 OF "O41 :R[:.l USISTr4 el-t1-.• PAGE I f :/E:l 40. DUE 141JYI /Ct004 /fE\ )L LCq PlIM f^C 31r11 W. IY1. • FI55IF a3/21106 241.12 P"L1: ERPL R?r fSSO -ERA PITA 10 S/4/46 01-0141-241-42 • 9f331/ 43121/44 14.10 PJOLIC TOP. REV Rasa a.RI ITT$ 1. 3/11146 01-tN1-IL-U se3s9f 03121191 4.49 PJBLIC 'OPL ACT 4554 -Eft M4 to 3Jafa6 41.041-444-00 • 303sit 0312//0A f43.54 POOLIC -1P_ RE! SISR prat llt4 TO Staff{ 11-4142-sis-11 • A 3SYI 05121166 Worse NR[C EWL GET also Plot 2I14 To 3~41 I2-tUl-S4h 11 823591 43/2l/a6 I6g.51 PJGLIC TOP. SET tssR T-\\ 1/24 TO 3/9/16 II-•I41-sag-4T • RISS9t 03/21146 40.13 PORLIC Tot, fil also Tres IIT4 to Sows{ /h seU-110-f1 • 3.334.$S • •....• ....... • 013411 03121146 12105 PFPSI :KNfJ' 4tLG 414 •44:4 II-l"o-SIS-94 • 12r.'s . ..loll •.•-C45 • 493611 03121144 31.29 P40q 46CIHI 17• SlPN [[S 01-4214-12 WSI ]I.r9 • S53L2J 03/21/66 319.39 E) PfILLVS S i"S liar •JACK I1-4412-5I5-14 • 143L20 03t2t/R6 1.18- E3 .41L1IPi a Sits oil: MC 11-MU-335-90 362.19 • 1 .loll• ....... • RI3ix3 13/21/96 169.21 PJ.MA Kat% 4 %330: 4-r4ii-I 01-•101-093-1u 1 9536x0 03/21/86 4,594.12 P)PyK .WIT I ASSOE :3J4! t•. 11-4102-966-I1 093624 03/21/86 L2x.12 P2PlaK MAIL a ASSO: C293J.190J Jl-U33-J6h 1e • OJS620 03/21/66 00.09 Pa.RAR RAIL 6 AS39L C24SALFUK R-4]0 h0ah I6 1 333L29 0312046 354.30 POP"" RAIL a SSoc COfLJLT14G 91-4303-121-31 /13425 C3121181 269.15 13-4%4 MAlt 4 tsia: :315JLt1f6 91-4103-144-11 • 016629 05121". 2.452.i3 PJ144. Nall a 4S59: :44sJ.tla1 4i-4313-432-OC 1 1,196.27 • ...... ....C., 1 095651 03/21/66 2.091.35 -314:94 MIT S:E4 •)4:4 11-4615-sIS-44 • OSSL34 as/tl/a4 94.93. POST -5% 0111 93! 4_7 T-191i-SIS-l0 / 053634 03/21/44 15.90 POGC9a Olit IN -14V 11-4 ax0-SIf-90 1.923.Ss � 1 • N16s9 03/21/46 11.30 PRAIRIE OF -SEW P41i/'04L 91-4322-114-33 1 11.18 AS ...... ....CAS 1 615a17 E3/2VA6• 24.14 S1 PLYL •Oft art SJ••LLES 01-4210-121-31 • 16.20 . 1 ...... ...-TKs • 1 0i3a31 93/22/96 31610 9/MER3.O ill 1O1oE■ 0t! 1632IM•1 91-05*3-I99-17 I'll '11I O3 O"W :9C:C 40. DATE 3 a3r42 0312111. 043]00 03/21/66 M159 0302114• 331116 03121146 lesrri 03/21/96 33378r 23121/66 06Sre9 W21/66 J91642 03/21146 393010 03/2l/66 9651/0 43/21". 393901 93/21/56 393932 03/21/86 043903 03/2a/46 a:FS19 03121046 Cot., RL.ISE.4 443JVT 4 FOR III\ kil41✓1I411 3II.33 41.10 009 Sf IEIC.[4 6.16 EYJI•I•TSJACCCSS 429.15 ON ST%f IC4ER 6011% AM E9110 96/.FS . 201.30 WAR RATE 4UT484iff 112 if 4ENERS9I✓ 200.34 . 1034.36 MN•E DIST C0 CEt •J4CY I11.30. T.04•E 0351 C9 431 4:1 19216.9E IrSJR fig. siM r CO BUNSAOS FIAT S9.' 115.3E 10.03 taRISISIE •1214 414 ✓I4--4 54.39 AtCOWi N. IM. A ..a. A AT l3AR • •.-P s 01-4l 1f-It9-JI 91-•SS9-121-]I 91-43era19-Ix n-9RIs-s15-90 /I-60iMS15-10 94-4)11-599-9] 11-4421-SLS-90 Y412414 -C]TO Si -ICE\SE 4i-U41-0 N-I2 •.19 V:ST 'd§L13Y)0S CJ ISOW-Till"CLS 01-4T10-I24-31 16.00 54.)4 FIRE tvlT2.T9I ASIA 13043f•E410. 01-4249-I14-3] SA.90 ]0.]0 /ACC[ 9a C9RT4 JI4•ft.4a9LS 01-. su-I29-31 H.9a CARS, law 114'• 1337 91-230S-000-00 61.JJ 169.59 11249 rIWUS 4=h 11-IF C4.43/3 91-US9-9t\-11 166.19 16.11* VARIANTS JAC13S RIsE49E 01-.191-1H-33 0 MIA6 ltll city or me" f f 4:ISO I ( .-I NI t:rNt f crt•t t-It02 ( 4.7902 •: 150t t •:6.3 4-1N] t 1: 1644 ( 1: 26.1 • 1-160S •.Feel • ,:fits CIN6 • 11647 1611 1-IRS I • •:r%51 .: 1631 y'T65t • .:/651 .-IL51 .- I s%I • w-rs51 ♦:lost .-I651 • .9651 crest R 2iSI • .:1651 • W16S2 OS/21/66 03/21/a6 /3021/96 95/21/61 03/21/6L 23/21/66 03/21/46 83/21/64 13/r 11 46 63/21/46 03121/66 C)151166 01/21/86 63/21/et 03121116 03111/a♦ 23/21/•, 03121/86 A10J1T ri.)1 6.I\- ef1.3! I Se.li 2.1r- u1..5 . ass./* 61.25 66.2s- 6A2s 302.25 1.094.59 21.12- I.Jrl.11 ".10 209.32 26501 $61.10 5.12- 3N.26 126.2S lt.ls- sit.R I3..f3 2.r6- I31.t5 . :OC:! R01 SIiA )).1431 1t)1 JD.1SD\ 8439 iti\)S COVET i111;S C".3t c6•t Tot clef CAPITOL an CAPITOL city CAPITOL C111 tlAL111 RISE "atilt miss ReRI•\I L1f Et P.Ufflt a SNS u •uLun O Nllit •i 1JALITP Rigs 016LI1T R[0E EJ •t L11PI El 16ILLVJ f11' •IP:. 61t: )Ise Lit 'N-0 LIS )I/: dig, •1\ed tsn Iltts lilt Sets )1/C L13 PIT:* Lt) ).Se :«•ft.tms 612C •N:. It_ -view 116C )Ile Lit •J1-. Ll6 )IS - Sec •JR: n6: )Is: accoYAr e5. 1N. • •. J. . we .'K. I1-"12-l15-16 11-0616-111-N r1-64 f -al a-« rl-6412-all-111 rt-061l-SIS-16 rt-6111-11S-141 11-1411-Sts-N n-.A/s-al rls PI-01\1-Sl l-« JI-6266-211-.2 yt-e112-SIS-16 II-e2l1-l1 a-« n-•u ]-s1r« II -a 610-511-YU n-•m -Sl s-n 1l-Nit-Sl l-N n-.6t t-Sts-w. 03a21/66 22S.65 06EIISS All 30 `1-e 2ft6 t6 3IW" 61-4102-139-12 C3/21/16 5.1• DDCAISi NET DI •1G till T1 t/Met 01-NN-N 0-11 03/21/86 13.sl OOEt/Sl REI o2 'Ct the T1 106I" 1b6U 2-6N-2• 03/2"66 170./6 D"Qfsi RET Of -let lips IS .law" PI-OND-O6f-IS 03121/Oi 16.46 DOEUS/ RET 00 'let 2/26 TO LW" Se-116t-611-LI 03/21/66 ".'e 09174f1/ RCI 39 •ICt P126 10 lKa" 01-4t6i-1/5-St 13/21/" 24M.S0 DOEtIS! NET Of stet race t0 WW" 41-1161-Ira-33 03121/66 •15.11 113ElIs0 RET of ract 2/t. IS "WN 11-e1Q-NO-.2 63/21/26 36.52 oDCl/SI NET o0 •let 212e TO SIW" 11-1t12-299-61 03/21/06 ?.Be ODERess AO Of rlet tits TD WWN 40-414/-ADO-011) 03/21/86 S4.25 DOERISa OCT Of PIC& 2124 TO 31WN ri-eI0M15-16 93/21086 12.S6 0044010 RET if pick me to "W" 12-41142-a44-11 /3a21116 I42.31 04CV11 MET of Pit% TIN we "W" IYeN2-N1-1! 03121/86 so.)I D31AISS REP 3I -let Z016 CO Said" t1-6162-110-15 1.611.50 AU21164 2.30 cow t6 sh-Ci it !ALES faR/DEN6 .Aw4 ..w4 of .0 .Awu PAWL YRWL •6w4 MIR Raw" .Iwu ..wAL DIL •u •-�14 •AN4 .Awu •Aw4 ..w4 -awl, AAw4 PAPUAI PAwA,A -APU.t .AI .,.At 9.wAL awl . tRDAI .AwAL PLt1J4 -AWAL .6RYLL .Awm t FeA CIIT OF ORONO :1E:4 W. DATE 4-/632 1R1/eG 4T1e32 322V86 .1DJNf 19.00 2.1f0.S0 2.216.09 . 34. 731. 23 31.e2 2.AOt.t3 11.632.29 2.A11.2S IS.0IS.FT mr.11 rA.AAa.3t :VE:{ AEGISIEA IESOOA IfEA )EICR90tim C344 Ile SA -ES T1 SALES TS■JFEAAA :3N1 at 3ASS Tf SALES fl1JFEV/A 03-2.-86 PAGE TL ACCOUNT W. IM. 1 •.0. 1 MESSAGE 41-2272-146-00 PANUAL r1-2212-100-W NAAINL FJVD 01 SAM SENESSI FUNKS FJVO Al TOTAL I'A1 14.4"1 AEV3LVERG P FUND 15 TOTAL LOSS SPEC ASSESSASVS FUN FJ10 71 TOTAL L1OJN OPEAAfLNG FUND FJ13 72 fOf AL Uf!% DKAATING FJNO FJVD 23 TOTI- ".EVCA O-ENATIO.. FJND FUND 14 TOTAL O3Le :VJRX OPERATING FO TOnL ...-ER; ' 1996 CITY OF ORONJ .NECK W. DATE 106110 3.109/8. 194010 04109/6. 190010 04/09/06 104010 04109186 I090I0 04/09/46 1060I0 01/09166 116010 0\/09/66 139019 0./0R/A6 94,09/46 11\02) 0\/01/n6 11%030 0.109/A6 194030 01/09186 IJ 0031 04109/46 - 1J.OSl OH09/86 13\0J1 06/09/BO 134031 OV09/e6 13,031 1]6039 04109/8. 1NOai 04/09/86 104002 00/e11O0 136950 04/01/96 194065 011n"96 :NECK RE6ISILR C.-1.-B. FAIL i AMOUNT MEN006 ITEM OESCRIPTIJM Arrgj%l S0. 1". • +.0. A RKSSA6E 23.T3 AT&T 1NPO SYSTEM "MY OFF EQUIP 01-4360-039-12 23.73 AT&T go" SYSTEM NIf OFF EQUIP 01-4169-059-16 23.15 AT&T 1R0 SYSTEM MOT OFF EQUIP 01-4340-069-15 23.13 ALIT IRO SYSTEM MIT OFF EQUIP 01-4310-129-31 .23- MIST IRO SYSTEM "I OFF EQUIP O1-N0O-129-A 2303 AT&T 1R0 SYSTEM MIT OFF EQUIP 01-0360-I14-33 23.F3 A347 IRO SISTER MAT OFF EQUIP 01-4340-249-I2 162.15 ••.-CBi 25./9 AMERICAN LIRE% MOT ALOG/011GS /1-6163-915-90 25.19 . 125.90 APPLE OALLET •➢ENCT ERAJP FLQAf O1 INS 91-6313-93Y 12 125.09 APPLE OALLET ASEKY EQUIP FLOATER INS 61-4315-1FG-35 250.00 9.00 At I T IITS STSEEN TELEPRQUC 11-0320-319-90 9.00 AT & f INF2 SYSTEM TELEPMAOE /4-4120-SSO-93 10.00 .96 AT I I CORR TELEFMONE 01-0520-129-11 1.01 AT I T CORI T?LE'ROSE 01-9325-114-33 14.23 Al A I Co.. TELEP02XE 4-4320-119-30 .$I AT A , Cam, IELEIMOSE .-4120-26►62 1.01 AT A T CORR IELEPMQOE IM\32 M599-I] 16.65 •.•-CM3 02.68 EARL F ANDERSON ASS'. ST 42F SUP 91-6230-269-62 122.66 ..._CKS 39.50 ASPLJMO COFFEE RIG Effnv!E Ol-\l60-Il\-SJ M.50 ASPLJMO COFFEE MTG EXPENSE el-.}e3-020-11 79.96 609.16 BART2N SAMJ I LR $T MOT SUP 61-9213-299-42 909.16 ••• -C RS SS.00 SLACIONIAK & SOMS MST BLO&11I0S 81-6343-099-IT S0.00 1416 Oil, of O[ONJ CNECM AESISICM 04-14-0. PACE 2 • ]6C CY 40. OAIC ANWN! 0[N006 ilCM OC3Ci VIIOY ACCOWT W. IVY. 0 P.G. • vE55LGl :O 00T1 06/Oi. - 9.11 BOtlli LN\SY: • C3[F/SC AiOL; 01-61]6-I11-3I 9.11 • • 19Le26 06/6V66 65.20 SONESTMOO e9SENE AS% ERG COei JLT Ot-610Y261-01 1160/6 90/91/86 135.00 6CNESTAOO M6SENE ASK I" CONSULT 01-63OS-249-62 LJ60I4 a./o9/e0 140.30 NOR STRING NOSESE ASM EGA CONSULT II -•...-.'a- A • 329.00 • 100091 46/091" 16.65 si%irs AAA SUPPLY MI■ 104:4 TT-.eta-SN-95 10.95 • • 10012♦ 00/19/86 12.60 COCA COLA VENDING EWIP MENIAL 11-0311-516-05 11404 06/09/86 26S.16 COCA COLA VENOIN6 all PW1CN )1-0V2Y516-15 251. I0 IF to 10012■ 00ANR 102.10 CONCCPI [IONSFILN oINEA CUN50t1 11-6306-I14-33 $42.16 • ...... .••.CAS 190102 90/69/86 266.63 COPY DUP Pe INC O.F SJPPLIES 01-0210-039-12 • 114142 04/04/86 10.33 COPY OUP PM INC GrF SJPPLIES O1-4210-US/-16 136162 04/09/06 S2.91 COP, OUP PA INC OFF SYP.LIES 01-0230-069-15 106102 01/09/e6 1.68 COPT OUP PA INC OrF SUPPLIES el-6210-129-31 • t90142 04/01/86 222.19 COPY OUP Pt Inc O-F SJPPLIES 31-0216-116-33 100192 a./OWD6 0.26 COPT OUP P6 INC 9'F SUPPLIES a1-.IIo-249-.2 136/62 04/01/86 19.33 C2PT DUP Pe INC OFF SJPPLIES 11-0230-51 Y16 • 120142 04/09/36 .20 COPY DUP PA INC OFF SUPPLIES 11-1216-569-91 110102 O./99/86 0.H COPY OUP P1 INC 0•F SUPPLIES I3-1210-569-91 ST6.93 • • t31111 04/09/86 11.36 ctme MU08EM $YAW ail6/v U9L 01-.322-170-33 17.36 13,150 0VI0/86 39.10 CJLL1649 MYl 0,3;/440S 91-1263-019-11 39.T5 • g1155 011091.6 2.259.10 CUSANAN MOt ON CA INC a1NEM ERUIP 76-6560-599-93 2.2S9.F9 1966 Cill OF ORONO :NECK Nt6l STT4 r C4ECM 40. DATE AMW NI VENDOR ITER DESCRIPTION • 146243 04119144 11257.10 OAT DISTAIIUTLNG CO 8EEA PARK" 134t13 04/09/86 10.JD- DAY DISTRISOTI6G C0 ear L'T r 1.239.00 116162 04/05/06 11,40.15 EAST SIDE SEVENAGE BEER POOCY 134167 041091A6 ]4.00- EAST SIDE BEVERAGE ODT NET r 1.10..65 130203 04/09/86 S1.SI EAIC45ON/OURT CBSF/SC40013 194203 64/0984 8.32 ERIC4SON"JOT CN4SCBCOLS r 1842O3 04119106 8.24 ENICNSOU/MJAT MILEAGE 49.81 . 104212 04/09/96 104.00 G A 4 SERVICES OE44106 APO 194212 04/0,196 10.00 6 6 4 SERVICES Si "I sup 134272 04/01/66 43.70 6 A 6 SERVICES MET BLDG/GNDS 1362r2 04/09/46 SS.40 G 4 a SERVICES NUT OLDS/GODS r 184212 60289/86 22.09 G a A SERVICES REAMING AN 114212 84/49/8G 4.61 G 6 4 SERVICES UTIL STS Sup 190212 04199186 2J0 G 8 4 SERVICES NOT BLDG/GROS r 13421I 0410wat 35.12 6 6 M SERVICES OEA41K APP 184272 04/09/96 6.93 6 4 R SERVICES UTIL ITS SUP 104212 06109/64. 4.20 G 4 4 SERVICES 191 SLOGIGROS r 104272 Ul/09/86 10.49 6 A 9 SERVICES Y;14142 AM 296.r4 134275 0.169146 150.09 SOW- MEA-T" IVC 0;4LTM INS 1062TS O4149194 451.17 NW N[KTN ARC RIALTO 143 11422S 04/09/86 68.S5 GROUP M[ALTM INC RIALTO IRS 134215 24/4V8A 150.19 GRW- NEALIN INC NEALTM SEE 820.60 134291 14169/56 43.44 NALLIN/D4R DINT NILE46E 43.46 r (` 114291 U4/04186 SS.32 REM CTI CUEFS PTA: COST SC48OL5 SS.00 1043B3 04/29186 1.842.11 NEON CTT FIN 019 JAIL OBOES f I.8U2.11 r 64-14-41 IKC ] ACCOUNT : . SAM. • 1.0. C RISLY.L 71-4415-314-9$ 11-4416.SI -95 ...-CMS 71-44IS-S14-95 A-NAG-al•-95 CS -NSF lzf-3l 01-N04-129-SI CI-. ]01-139-31 01-1221-204-42 01-0273-26P 62 81-4343-09Yl r 41-4343-129-31 12-•22I-lAMfl 12-6234-A9-91 12-4343-S49-9 15-4221-549-92 13-4343-56S-9 13-4343-SAt 92 it-•22E-St0-13 21-4151-12F 31 91-4#51-12}31 01-4ISl-11M33 14-4151-519-93 61-4391-831-12 01-4396-129-31 61-43SS-000-16 .•-CNS I996 CITY OF DRUM V CCF W. DATE • ..uu • 10431,1 04/09/56 19&]SC J./IO/06 IC4346 0H09/05 • 116112 96/01/66 114316 G4/01/06 1..311 04/09/fin 1.1330 04/09/06 • • U1S91 04/10/06 10439Y 0411"86 L36391 04/19/86 104397 09/10/06 to ...... 10440, C4/10/66 10940• 04/10/afi 139419 04/10/C6 • 10•443 04/12/46 CHECK REGISTER A.OWIi VENOM TIER OCSCRIP110N CI-1.-ab •A6t &,COUNT W. INN. • P.O. A RISSAV 25.03 HENSEL PILLAGE 01-4361-)29-31 25.03 11.92 IcM RETgNI ,ORP ILIA 3-19 t9 1-2)-9. 01-9140-039-12 11.92 22.79 I41L CITY 16RNf ASS" 816aS/•'AI02CLS 21-42.9-129-31 22.19 . 41.11 JoN"S Aull IAPP61 EAUIPIPIS/ACCESS 01-9232-L29-31 •1.19 .... C.; 59.13 JUNRSON PA -ER CO SE04C SJPPLIES YI-6230-0S-%C 59.1) 3.5! JDMNiON/ONOlE1 :ONE/SCN3CLS Il-N SEA-129-A 3.55 152.10 JOBS CNEPICAL ufiL SYS Mf SJP 12-•2l9-la11 152.10 36.62 ROENR-TNORAS TRAVEL-f6tl 01-•3Q-µ9-1S 12.11 RYENN-T HOURS TRAVEL -OAR 01-4I111-669-15 6.65 NDENO-TNORAS IRAVEL-RAR 12-9301-5.9-91 9.99 .YENS-f N•1AS TRAVEL-040 7"311-569-92 6R.D2 ...-Cai 149.22 TOR: LASER AOCfl00 ADY 01-31iF000-µ µ.0% In LACER ADVERTISING Y1-43LS-S/5-90 235.26 192.41 LONE: LF fAtO TRCTOR EGOV/•T"ACCESS 192.61 590.51 ME I6C SEDER CGOST .5-9531-.32-OC 1)96 CITY OF ORONO CHEC[ REGISTER .. 19-96 PAGE I P a CCF M0. DATE MOYM! VENOM ItCR DESCRIPTION etC OYAi W. IMY. • P.O. • HES51 E r S90.5T •.uu ••.-CF3 r IOHH 01/19/86 7.36 LIMA* LOSSES EOUIPIPf S/ACCESS 01-128 -12t 11 1.34R • .u•u ...-CAC U H60 01/10/06 I.KS.YS MARK NII DIST GEED 'JACK 11-H15-Sl.-H 184160 01/10186 171.60 AHRM Oil GIST 68l REf 11-111{-Si1-f5 191.60 04/1016, 523.32- MAX 911 DIST GOI MET 11-40IF519-9S 1.616.13 -..... ...-C65 • 116414 01110186 900.50 HEIR% WASTE C5%T4 OL SRC CME/MNCC 01-2226-000-90 946.50 r 101185 0./10/86 29.40 MILS OXYGEN CO HMI HIS: EQUIP 81-1512-21%-12 29.10 !• •.-ESS o•u• 134490 04/10/86 85.16 RIMEGASCO UTILITIES 81-1324-129-31 101990 04/13/86 359.99 RIMEOASCO UTILITIES 12-1321-519-91 109190 04/13/66 27.22 RIMMEGGSCO UTILITIES /3-4324-Ul-92 472.97 ••.-C[i H' 131495 4.110/66 1.00 M REMCIIT ASS" HEALTH IM- 01-9151-126-31 7.08 H• .—INS .....• 129505 6*110/46 61.00 RIM FIRE INC HAD; HIS: EQUIP 61-1512-129-31 r 61.00 .—CAL r 136SD9 01110/66 150.00 RB DEPT PUB SAFETY DTF SPLIES 1N 91-9510-129-3I 1S0.09 ...-CAS U 1512 01/10166 35.80 RPCL%A DARE UERIS CMF/SCONES 01-1556-129-3/ 35.60 ... C%S ...... 189522 041I1/66 M2.S8 RTI DIST c8 SLOV 6MDS RUT W 11-4231-516-13 I 181S22 04/12/06 3.394.011 NI DIST C9 OTHER COSTA 16-1560-$90-13 e IRa& City Of ORONO 04LCR B. DATE LROUNT 3.676.14 LIO534 O IL91ON 229.e0 220.00 • ` OISt5 04110186 taJ6 104545 091101.E 27.50 LS.16 L TI4548 04110/86 24. 22 164549 04/10/66 32.91 MESH 04/10/66 00.59 V UL»e 00/18/44 30.Is 10E549 s4/10/e6 16.13 Iss»S 0411016E 8.16 134549 0611013E 7.39 210.91 � uuu 19E550 04110146 32.10 la455o 9411018E ».D0 111550 0v10166 I.Se $6.90 � u•u. 100559 04/10/66 259.33 134559 04/10/86 166.93 104559 04/16/46 212.23 1245" 04110/116 54.20 194559 04110/86 1.025.10 134559 .411018E 1.0".12 lots59 9E/10/a6 34.I3 2.225.29 112563 04/10/86 SS.Is N, 109569 09010146 55.12 134558 04/1 G/H 27.55 Lots" 04/10/06 151.34 194546 01114146 $5.10 1305" Doll 016E 11.12 134548 041lMS6 SO.00 1545" 9411018E 15.b0 394568 24119/86 51.21 L46568 0411619E 12.45 134568 04/10/66 32.61 CHECK REGISTER VEAU04 ITEM OESCRIPTIOa PRTetota TIC OTMEt EONIP NAVARRE AUTO REPAIR MMT LUTA NAVARRE AUTO REPAIR Mar WTO W9A\0E M 400ARE NAVARRE IILt D11ARE NAVARRE MgDVARE NAVARRE IMt OOERE NAVARRE "4"AME NAVARRE MtOVARE NAVARRE MLt OANC NELSON ENTERPRISES NELSON EWI; POISES NELSON EOTERMISES BLOGIOROS NOT SUP LOVV/PTMACCESS La9E HPf"ACCE SS E W 9011T NACCE sS ESU1P/1111ACCESS foul•/PILACCESS EDUI-IPTS/ACCESS LIO PUNCH list PVtt. HTI PWCH OS-IE-16 PasL n ACCOUNT No. 141, a I.O. R wssAaE ...-CAS 19-9551-bJ3-9A Ix-1I91-)99-11 TI-9111-561-91 Ol-4211-091-It 01-4212-119-31 01-Ix]2-xE9-9I el-9xar-2+9-u 12-4232-SH-91 2S-G212 49-92 1I-4212-»9-93 T1-tH0-S1h15 f1-1912-SIt-9! 11-t0 t1-51M 9) asp MTILITtEf 41-932E-011-IT asp UTILITIES e1-4344-129-31 ASP UTILITIES 01-4324-249-42 ASP UTILITIES II-9329-29s-71 asp UTILITIES /2-0329-549-91 asp UTILITIES 13-4324-569-90 asp UTILITIES II-9329-590-93 NOM149ESTf1N BELL TILEPANE 91-aax0-OS1-12 MRTVULSICtO SELL TELEP 0 91-4320-OS9 1. 00914WESTEQS SELL TELEP"O[ 01-LJx9-4t15 SORTANESTEI■ BELL TELEPHONE 01-4320-129-31 NOMINAL STLCN SELL TELEPHONE O1-1320-114-33 NORTANESTERN BELL TELEPHDNE 01-4320-1?1-34 MORTISESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 0i-4329-115-34 N09TO"STEtN BELL TELEPHONE 01-4320-249.12 MORTHVESTEIN BELL Y_LEPM9C Tl- 020-l15-90 NOOTIVESTERS BELL ADVERTISING 11-4323-SIS-94 NONMVESTERM SELL TEL!►M I2-4129-5.9-11 ..-Cal • • 1456 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REIISTLR 0•-1.-Pr. .1.1 T ]NECK NO. DATE •00YNT .EMOOR ITEM DESCRIPTION .CC ],*1 NJ. 1N. . P.O. . q'.a66[ IO0569 WISING 49.03 NORTANESTERN BELL 1-ELEPNONE 13-0329-169-92 13%US 94110/84 .19 MORINIIESTEIN KEE TELEPROSE rJ-1320-569-12 100566 00/IOAi .10 MORTRMESTLAN BELL TEL'.1MBNE 13-6321-5,10-12 110669 06110/66 13.4* NNTKNESTEI■ BELL TELEPNOIIE 11-6320-990-13 130961 24/10106 II0.23 MORTMOESTERB BELL ADVERTISING N-4123-%91-93 095.61 .0 u• •• -CKa IJ&59I 04/10/86 64.91 PUBLIC EML REV ASSN PER, 3-11 TO 3-25-66 01-0101-139-12 100597 06/l0/B. 6.24 PUBLIC LIME BET ASSN PEtA 3-10 TO 3-13-6. 91-0101-606-13 13659/ 64110/86 7.26 PUBLIC EMPL NET ASSN TERM 3-18 TO 3-23-06 61-0101-N1-1. 10*597 00/10/61 99.53 PUBLIC EWE NET ASSN PER 5q0 T9 3-23b6 61-0Ng-N9-lf 1J6S91 04/10/86 6.16 PUBLIC EWE MET ASSN F J-16 TO 3-23-16 11-4101-699-IF IOol91 01/10/4P 1.546.15 PUBLIC EML REV ASSN P*.R 3-11 TO 3-23-61 01-U01-Ill-31 100593 04/10/B5 56.02 PUBLIC EWE MET ASSN PERA 3-11 N 3-23-Bi CI-0161-11 •r 31 100593 01/10146 495.10 PUBLIC EMPL KT Af5* PERA 3-14 TO 3-ZS-66 01-0161-121-31 136SSI 04/10/06 T52.61 PUBLIC EWE NET ASSN PER& 3-10 TO 3-23-66 01-01*1-12h31 10OS97 60/10/86 209.39 PUBLIC EWE MET ASSN PER& 3-10 TO 3-23-96 61-0141-11*-33 100591 04/10186 220.S0 PUBLIC EML RE ASSN PENA 3-10 10 3-23-86 11-0141-204-02 10059/ 04/10/56 19.00 PUBLIC ERML MET ASS* PER& 3-10 lO 3-23-06 OI-0101-2la-,1 13359E 01/10/66 2.80 PUBLIC EWE NET ASSN PER& S-10 10 3-23-86 01-0IU-006-0. 10659E Oo/10196 16*.79 PUBLIC EMPL MET ASSN PEAR 3-14 t0 3-:P-.. R-UU-f15-K gloss] 04/16/94 65.89 PUBLIC EWE MET ASS" PEAK 3-15 TO 3-23-K. )2-0101-169-11 100591 04110186 176.10 PUBLIC EML NET 43K1 P£R& 3-10 t0 3-21-16 13-1L61-569-92 10659E 04/10/66 71J6 PUBLIC EMPL MET %-"M PERA 3-10 10 3-23-66 N-*161-Sf0-9J 3,933.25 i H61t 06/30/96 139.65 PEPSI COLA/OUP STL& RIL PUt:M 71-4920-516-9f 131.65 196612 04/10/86 569.10 PERRIS DEEP ROCK ST RMT AUTO 91-6301-219-*2 130612 04/10/96 315.17 PERRIS DEEP RACK ST NOT AUTO 01-*341-290-.1 110612 04/36/86 20.10 PERRIS DEEP ROCK ST RRT AUTO 12-6361-S69-11 13461E 04/10/66 30.15 PERRIS DEEP ROCK ST TINT 4013 1Y 0361-569-92 1.035.12 I66612 04110186 23.>R PHOTO FACTORY OFF SUPPLIES 01-6210-U59-10 100613 60/10/86 6.60 4012 FACTORY OFF SUPPLIES 01-6210-129-31 36. TB . ...... ..._CAS 136621 01/ID/66 633.21 PHYSICIANS HEALTH RESET" INS 81-S012-806-60 134621 04/10/66 255.56 PHYSICIANS ME&LFH MEAL14 INS 11-6I51-039-12 106621 06/1/266 256.56 P*YSgCIAM3 HEALTH KALTH INS 11-015M661-15 100621 00/10/06 99.51 PMVSICIAM REALTM HEALTH INS 91-0151-121-31 LJ46Z1 04/10/86 111. 16 PNISICI AMS MEALIN KALI11 INS 01-*151-126-31 13,621 04/10/66 1.132.I6 PMTSICIAN MEALTM "EALTM INS 11-6151-129-31 12,621 @1119186 256.56 PHYSIC. AND KALTH HEALTH INS 6l-*ISS-12M33 120621 09/10/M6 603.96 PMTSICI ANN HEALTH HEALTM INS 11-0131-209-62 Ife6 CITY OF ORONO CNECa MD. LATE 194621 04110/8. 100621 a4/10/86 134621 04/10/8, MAIL 04#10186 101628 04/19n6 100628 94114/66 13462B O4110166 IO4628 o4/la/t6 184426 44110196 13460a 04110/06 I1a620 041101e6 114626 04/10/66 L0O629 04/14/86 Il•633 04,1018, I10633 a./la/86 534634 04/10/81 106434 04,10/86 164634 Au16/4f I00634 0. na186 L 0163e 04/10/86 00112 04110/84 144712 o.no/ea lzaltt auto/ee ION l2 0•/IO/86 u4nz D.n4186 134712 04/10/ 14712 0/10/64 104710 4411018E 154712 0.11018E 104712 04110189 104712 041101e4 I 04/164 1E MILT 04/l0/9/BL 144 n. 6•/la/Df ]MCCA REGISTER 43UNT 9[ROOA LTC* 3ESC41011 CRY 153.99 PMTSICIARS MEAL KALIR INS 401.55 PMTSICIARS KALTN MEALtM IRS 100.22 PHYSICIANS MERLIN HEALTH INS 150.54 PHYSICIANS HEALTH HEALTH 113 4.145.11 . .24.30 POPMAM MAIL I ASSOC RETAINER 3..60.96 PBPHAN "All a ASSOC Cw41 AP n.IS POPMAN NUA a Assoc GRACE CONSULT 401.01 PONIIAR "AIR I ASSOC LIONS. CONSUL? 60.00 PIPMaN MAIL 8 Assoc LESY CONSULT 30N.0a POPMAM Nut A ISSoc LEG.L CONSULT ee.rf vaPMAM MUA a Iss4c LEGAL I SULT 690.20 POPMAM MAIR a ASSOC LEGAL CO OWL 15.0E POPHAM Mall S ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT 5.922.03 PAGE s ACCOUNT 40. IRV. A ..D. I RCSML 01-AtSI-110-61 1i-4191-515-91 -4151-549-11 -U Sl-K9-1i 61-4301-805-16 a1-Nax-eeaae Ol-UeYNe-l6 o1-•saYKe-s6 eo- •]es-uf-s] e1-uas-z4s-N 01-•3a Y6.6-11 s-•3u-.5:-a0 tl-.L Y5I3-f0 63.00 PRECISION sus SYS OFF SIP -LIES 61-421"59-12 .3.20 PRECISION $US STS OFF SJP.LIES 01-421E-1 r4-33 166.00 •.GO POGREOA GIST STORE Sir I1-4239-S13-99 1,020.05 POGAEBA CISI BEER PORCH /1-4015-514-95 8..00- PMESA DIST eat Alt T1-4016-510-45 20.30 POPIEBA .IST RIs PORCH 11-4410-S14-95 960.05 25S.S1 PRAIRIE Or FEET PRTG/PJ3L 11-4322-5I5-9L 258.61 216.2E 0.0.E.l. S.S dE! 011 FICA 1-20 t0 4-6-56 E1-41.2-019-t1 r.0s O.0.E.R.E.5.1ET DIN FIC4 3-24 TO 4-4-K OI-eIa-G•E-I1 1 •a.sa O.o.c.t.s-s.NET DIV FICA 3-24 10 4-0-06 Ft-411E-469-15 25... O.0.E.R.S.E.MET DIV 19CA 3-24 TO 4-6-K 02-414E-0»-Lr 78.53 0.0.E.t.0.3.RET 019 FICA 5-24 TO 4-4K 81-414E-11Y11 30I..f O.O.E.R.S.S.RET On FICA 3-24 we 4-6-06 11-4142-114 23 3e2.sO 0.0.E.t. i1d[I Div FICA 3­24 TO 4- 416 01-414E-249-42 23.50 O.0.E.R.S.S.AET On FICA S-N to 4-6-61, 01-414E-nr61 11.32 C.O.E.A.LsdET CIE FICA Y24 TE 4-6-04 41-414Y44"a 60.13 O.B.E.A_".MCT Big FICA 3-I4 To 4- 44 11-4142-515-10 95.11 O.O.E.t.0.E.tET DIV FCC& Y20 TO 4- 66 52-4112-34t11 121.10 0.0.E.R.0.S.NET DIN FICA 3-24 TB .-6-86 TY419E-56f-92 9T.13 0.0.E.N.usacl Div FICA 3­20 TO 1-"4 rR-4I42-514-93 1,578.18 . 1.628.L0 ST nu-11 606 Env 6LO6 toa CMSL REMIT 61-2222-000-90 ...-CaS 1R26 CIIy OF ON" CNEC% NESlSIER N-1 ._[. PA" 1 }ECS W. DATE 6160NT NINON IfEI OESCRIPTINI ACCOUNT M. 1". N ..01 0 MASSIVE I.A20.12 IN 116 D0/10/66 y.730.55 T.ORPE Dist CO Me OANCN 11-001s-S10-95 ,IrG 94/10196 16.60- I.UA.F 0"1 cc "I NET 11-011h S10-05 2.T31.o5 . Ilo R1 60/1MO6 1.804.00 TRACI OIL CO {ASSLIK 61-I266-6*6-84 Ivory% 60/10/56 1110.44- TRACI OIL C0 SUKIR 61-126h660-66 161y71 06/10/66 100.06 TUC. AIL C0 OIIKINE 61-I1H-{A6-01 1147r, 04/10/06 255.31 IUCT OIL CO UTILITIES 34­6324-394-91 2.1SS. SI 123 y61 90/14/96 91.17 IOWA LOUI• CO EYDI""SlACCESS I2-0232-500-91 91.17 ...... .....5 U4716 04/18/86 93.05 UNIFI%ls ULLIRIIEO al -MINI, AM 01-021 b 121-lI 104H6 00110/86 S2.13- uN119RNS OKNIFED C. NEMEL 01-6221-121-l1 116y16 00/1M416 Was MAMAS U6lINIIED NEAaINO AS. 01-0221-121-31 133.3S . U 1035 04116/86 06.06 LIIES INC E]UP RENTAL 01-6331-24Y62 44.00 13oS02 04/13/06 2.236.00 NAT2ITh CITY or III-- SERE 2%9 AIR 11-4310-133-32 2.236.60 uou •.•-CAS Bolo• WiBle6 9I.6S NN1TE OEM ANIUL CO A%INAL :ARE 01-036h1O6-35 I9466. 04/14166 2n.05 NNITE BEN ANIMAL CO 421RIL .ARTK 01-0361-I81-35 IVS.10 . lNK6 vollM06 10.00 01MEN BIROS N%I SLOG/M OS y1-0Nl-SIS-SO 10.60 131gS 06/1M86 11.10 NN[6NT NE" ELECT -ARC UfiLITICS 91-4320-J4b42 11.60 1.96 [IfT Of ORONO CNEC6 RLGISTER 04-14-66 FIAT N V(C( 40. OAT[ AIoj*f OEMOOR IftR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. 1". 6 F.O. a M[SSME 13,100 0./av/n6 24..0 AN MEANT ASSO 93OC4/PERIDCLS 61-024t-129-31 26.40 • 10.901 94,09,46 aI. tn.of AR PPRAISAL ASSOC OWNER CON394,T 0S-N6i-•32-OB Il •rt;.00 • 11.922 04/01/66 38.69 s e • •DOSS/••RIOOCLS 91-020-129-31 ".As 1]9905 04/04/06 502.01 ORMMIN GOLF OtM(R E3YIF 26-4560-51,11-95 13.904 01/04/e6 00.80 COAXIAL DATA AU$ AO OTOER CONSULT 21-03et53 -12 46.96 I31905 C./09/06 00.09 DAMON LTD CONF/SC466L3 01-43M-129-11 86.08 114196 0.109/96 3T.Fs THE 6W SNAP MT RISC EQUIP 11-4342-129-11 3T.9S I1490r 0./09/66 193.30 t4fC4114f I091/ERICSM CONE/SC900L4 C1-U %-i29-ll 195.19 19491e 04/O9106 616.99 EMPL6TEE 6ENETIT AOR A C INSURANCE .1-410Y299-42 104906 04/09/86 112.90 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT IA A C INS 31-6153-031-12 104969 U41Ow96 r.&F EMPISTEt OCMEFIT ADM A C IAS OI-A31a-Nils 104,106 04/0,194 196.45 CMPLATEE Ri REFI1 ADM 0 C INS 01-A11Y121-31 104988 04/691e6 2M.6s EMPL3IEE BENEFIT Apt A C INS 61-0113-126,-31 100991 01/O1166 B29.1s EMPLOIEE BENEFIT NM N C IMP 91-0155-129-31 134909 allows* I6r.D9 EOFLOTIE BENEFIT RUN A C [K 104960 011Ow66 676.99- EMPLOYEE BENEFIT AM 0 C [As et-•ls!-2A9-•2 I201M 041011116 6T6-N EMPLSTEE SENEFIT AM 11 C US 91-USY2.N-02 13496B 0410w96 53. 56 ENMBTEE BENEFIT AOR A C IMP 91-4113-294-i1 104906 01/09/66 53.56 ERK6TCE BENEFIT AM 11 C IMP 11-6113-515-90 104906 04/OwS6 147.12 CMPLOTLi BENEFIT A" 9 C IMP 12-tl SYSN-91 13091E 04/6116, 133.90 EMPLOYEE "WINTER AM 11 C IMP 13-4153-5A9-92 I30920 o./a•FeA 92.30 EMPLETEE 04 NET II ADM O C INS 16-4I53-596-95 z•tr6.10 134109 09n0/e6 19.M OFFSET FRTS Aat#IM AD9 U-1190-M6-M � 19.66 I»910 OH30/66 115d6 MA NEAL 440 OWNER CONSULS 6INSM-ISMSI 1TS.00 IZO911 ONTO/ec 33.25 FAX C0 SLOW"" Mf H.9231-lM-9! 33.25 I10912 01/10/06 T5.0S PUBLIC SAFETY EWER WAS AEC EMM Oh634-ISt31 • Ts.s6 . 130913 9./I01e6 6541.96 SEEKS" L NEEAMIO REPLACE 19" CA "t0 0N-3311016611-4141 • 6M.96 . 1116 city W ORONO :NECK N. DUE I90111 90118166 Hva9s 01/IVHa Acnfs 01119/96 .:FAsi 01/10/86 <1696 04110/N HOrNa 09114146 N:Tifa 01/19/96 9CrG9a 04/1NO6 H:-rasa 01/1-184 l:rOa 01/Ide6 6rafa 01/1.:14 .-rasa 01/1c". 4CI696 04/10/. T1N9 01/19/aa HC1696 01/10/94 c Fa9a 04183186 <1696 DI/lA/OL C Tist 0lnusi +:rift outa•A 4:1•f9 00/18/86 A:Tfin 00119/66 R:z699 0411018E R:ra99 01/2v56 9CYfin 04110l NA 9C7699 04110/94 RrN9 91/19: AA -1i99 **lives 11699 04116/9A NCI6vV 01/19/a4 NCTN9 01/11/96 W 7699 04110•A mine 9.119/94 arras 44/16/64 MCI►91 94/10/N :NELI1 %EGISU( 64-14-61. Pail It AROUNT YEMOOA ll(1 WSCQPI161 LCCIURT W. INY- I P.D. • NESSAI. I.19f.a• N i1NAS A ALT AND *--PLACE 1919 CK 10IJ 4x-3110-J00-00 1. nl. a• LOLDLR VALLEY CC C••F 01-4354-119-51 NANJAL •• -ca3 19.64 N NEN CORM COLLCN CN:/SCA00.3 Or1336-I14-33 NWAL 76.66 a 0.20 DOE. SS NET 09V Vi:1 3-I2 TO 3-z3-96 01-4112-439-12 PAWAL 1.13 DOCK Ss OFT Div FICA 3-10 TO 3-95-51 01-4142-040-13 MANUAL 12.25 DOER Ss Rif Div FICA 3-19 TO 3-23-90 CI-1142-939-to RWAL 147.1% DVE■ as NET NO FICA 3-10 10 3-25-96 01-4142-069-13 NWAL 15.69 DWR SS RE 019 FICS 3-10 TO 3-23-sa 01-4112-099-if RA 94.92 MEN Ss AIR DIV FICA 3-16 10 1-23-9. 91-11,12-115-31 NUTAL 337.12 OWN SS NET Div FICA 1-10 TO 3-1Yai 01-1L42-111-33 RW4 31I.13 DOER SS RE( 019 F1^.. '-I$ TO 3-23-86 01-4142-44F-12 MAWAL 52.64 OWA SS Pit DIV FICA 3-19 TO 3-21-K 01-111r-11 O-il RAW" 4.71 MEN SS NET DIV FICA 3 14 T9 3-23-94 11-tl12-MM00 "MAL 51.91 DKN SS MET Day FICA 3-39 TO Y23-96 11-1I9t513-16 MANUAL 19.29 "Ed $5 APT Div FICA 1-I3 TO 3-23-96 R-aH2-3N-fl RAW" 151.51 DOER SS NEI DIV FICA 3-10 TO 3-13-81 Ia-111x-xF-fz RWAL 129.96 DW1 SS a-i sit FICA 3-10 TO 3-23-6. 70-4142-590-93 MAWAL 1.646.82 is.19 POltMASTC. P351AGE T2-13Z1-319-11 RMU4 152.09 POSTMASTER •Os TAGE 13-0321-569-92 RACIAL 212.29 14.15 GEAAA W PARTS Eoit• GCESS 01-9232-2.9-.2 RANUIL 7.14 GENUINE PARTS Eaul. ACCESS I1-4232-s49-VI NWAL 19.4s GINIW PA.Ts coal, PIS 13-1232-]69-92 PANOAL U." . r•.36. ARCNFR PAFEa 0•1 sJP 91-I210-039-12 .uwu 5.65 ANCHOR PAPER o.F su• 01 T10-059-14 RAIUAL 10.13 AYCn2R PAFrR *If sip Ot- •10-069-15 AAMAL 40.49 ANCHOR PAFER OFF SJ- 91-121v-I29-31 MANUAL 34.91 ANCNOII PAPER OFF SY /1-1219-1/9-33 RWAL 1.51 AYCADA PAPER OFF so. 01-4210-211-42 MANUAL 3.63 ANCHOR PAPFa OFF SW 11-1219-511-96 RaNJ1L d9 ANCHOR PAPER ♦-I Sip 12-1219-]1t91 11NUaL 1.46 ANCHOR PaPEs SUN p-♦ilh]a9-12 •1Nuu 212da 3.212.S3 0•I9if CAPPER LID FAR:" 11-0910-S14-95 MANAL 43-11- 411993 C00•C2 LID 30C 11-1311-514-95 RANDAL 3.197.42 9.090.41 GJALITI NINE WINE PWKN "-4812-510-13 011uaE 1966 CITY OF OROMO 'NECK VO. DATE x[1161 0111V01 craft 04/10/66 NOrs2 C4110/06 MCFT63 04/10/46 '1C 1T63 66/10/66 xC1161 116/06 wrote 04/10/66 MCFFOs 06/10/06 MC1106 04110/66 AMOUNT 21.60- 1.636.61 "4.06 6.66- 6H.62 1.122.04 22 16 1.100.6, • RT3.6) 26.'.S- •S6.16 r6i.Gs 763.65 Is6.06 1S6.00 36.02R.LO 226.00 LO.63 2.4158.66 13.018.17 16.637.41 2.216.3P 2,129.42 6.211.95 00.026.)2 CHECK REIISIER VENDOR [TER DESCRIPTION GJALIIF VIVE VINE 3ISC IMTENCONTIMENTAL POG VINE PVRCx INTENCONTIMENIAL PRG VINE 016C MAN VINE VINE PViCM PRIOR MINE WUE DISC ED POILLIPS VINE `VAC" CO PMILLI►S east 319C MACGREGOR 66LF BALL ILSALE OIOVO GOLF COWfE CMAME FORD 06-16-8• PAGE 12 ACCOUNT f. IRA. A P.O. • ME. -'A" 11-H11-]16-)] PAMU.L 11-101I-5I6-)] MANUAL 11-I4S S-l/6-n MANUAL 11-4*12-516-65 MAw" 11-6113-]I1-)] MANUAL n-)622-sI6-n 04MAL n-ul]-]LG-s] MAMAJ AL 14-4e46-511-96 ,GY:AL 1N-1962-O00-N MANUAL FOND 01 Total 6 FOOD 16 TOTAL P iP OJTLAI I FUND 41 TOTAL FEAR E REVOLITMG F FOND 62 TOTAL 1966-1 _ ASSMNT FUND FUND YJ TOTAL 1965 S'-C ASSESSME AT FUR FUND 11 TOTAL L10JIR VAERATIMG FWU FUND 12 IOI.L WATER HERATIR6 FUND FUND 13 TOTAL SEWER OPERATING FUNJ FUND 16 TOTAL GOLF MAST OPEOIFINS FT TOTAL PUBLIC ATTENDANCE '9ONO MEETING DATE CGCAA e, PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 4• /</cFgr��nc� aRA 47, 1 -�<, �rnn,ti�� t�N (oZ 5-rEttil�iv K�-rq ,ti,z ti e. 1. .3. .4. 5. 6. 7. o. 9. !0. I nfo r m a+ i on IE le, tvi S coune'd !1n COURVIk Me FTING O kPR 121886 MY of DROM Memo 486-06 TO: VMark !3,i i c�rdson, City Administrator FROM: Tom Km !r., Finance Director DATE: March 21, 1986 SUBJECT: 1985 Police Department Operations Attached are schedules comparing the 1985 actual expenditures to the budgets for the police department operations in the general or "base" contract, and the additional manpower contracts for Long Lake and Spring Park. Also attached is a copy of the 1985 cost distribution by participating city and the resulting amount due to or from each city. The 1985 costs are $261 under budget. The amount under budget is made up of three parts; the base contract is under budget $5,629; the Long Lake additional manpower is over budget $4,709; and the Spring Park additional manpower is over budget $659. The net effect of the 1985 final c, tract costs is that Long Lake w billed an additional $3,701 in 1986, Minnetonka Beach will he credited $522 in 1986, and .Spring Park will be credited $ 4 1 U in 1986. �i rr M rxuxw, ACDAE. COST DISTRIBUTION BY PARTICIPANT COMPARED TD ESTIMATED COST DISTRIBNPICN BY PARTICIPANT 1985 BUDGET YEAR Long Minnetonka Spring Orono take Beach Park Total ESTIMATED COST DISTRUBUTION BY PARTICIPANT Coeposit 6 Applied to all except Contract Ch,je 71.790% 12.722% 6.160% 9.328% 100.300% Grow Budget $352,638 $ 62,491 $ 39,258 $ 45,820 $491,207 Administration 35 6,211 3,026 4,582 49,121 Total 90264 387,2 8r7rg 50,IU 0r3 8 Po1lc�hainhatAi fClbwniAld 1984-85) (75,474 ) (- (5-r8, 668 65 997 31-, Contract Charge 14,037 6,797 10,292 31,126 Total 372,424 $ 80,034 $ 38,753 T 58,683 $549,894 Aditional Manpower $ 78,948 $116,834 $195,782 Town Aid Credit (1984-85) (5,399) (8,085) (13,475: �8 -108,17TT- -18T,, Contract Charge 4,413 6,525 18,938 Total $ 7- 171 $Ti5�274 93,245i :.....:. ........ .......I Grand Total $372,424 $158,005 $ 38,753 $173,957 $743,139 AL`RAL COSTS DISTRIBUTION BY PARTICIPANT Grow Mats $348,596 $ 61,775 $ 29,912 $ 45,295 $485,578 Administration 34,869 6,177 2,991 4.530 48,558 Total 383.45 67,952 32,903 49,825 534,136 Police Town Aid Credit (1984-85) 16,051) (2,845) (1 377) (2,086) (i2,359 Total Net of Town Aid 367,405 6� 31,'526 47,739 5iT,7'.7 Contract Charge 13,848 6,705 10,154 39,707 Total 5367,405 S 78,955 $ 38,231 $ 57,M3 5542,484 Additional Manpower $ 83,657 $117,493 $201,150 Town Aid Credit (1984-85) (5,590) 78,067 (8 385) (13,975 10� 187,175 Contract Charge 4,684 6,546 11,230 Total T-3-2-,75T $1-15,654 $ 9-1 8,405 Grand Total $367,495 $161,706 $ 38,231 $173,547 $740,B89 Actual Costs Over (Under) Estimated Costs $ (5,019) $ 3,791 $ (522) $ (410) $ (2,250 Charge (Credit) to 1986 Contract Year Billing Dated 7-1-86 $ 1,851 $ (261) $ (205) Billing Date3 16-1-86 1,850 (261) (205) Total Charge (Credit) $ 3,701 $ (522) $ (416) CITY OR OIXM0 POLICE DEPARTMENT 1985 BUDGET - TWELVE WNTH REPORT DECEMBER 31, 1985 B A' E C O N T R A C T Actual Over Budget Actual (Under) Budget Salaries - Regular $267,686 $246,324 $(21,362) Overtime 11,024 22,899 11,875 Temporary - 12,621 12,621 Severance 3,000 - (3,000) Holiday (Union) 8,642 9,983 1,341 P.E.R.A. 32,543 31,542 (1,001) Social Security 1,766 1,647 (113) Hospitalization Insurance 14,691 15,055 364 Life Insurance 360 567 207 Workmen Compensation Insurance 14,012 8,385 (5,627) Unempluyment Compensation - - - Office Supplies 3,200 6,215 3,015 Gas and Oil 25,000 23,604 (1,3%) Clothing & Personal Equipment 4,250 6,152 1,902 Building & Grounds Maint& Repair Supplies - 118 118 Equipment Parts and Accessories 3,609 4,482 882 Books and Periodicals 850 1,418 568 Training Supplies 1,500 1,263 (237) Legal Consulting 2,090 1,366 (634) Other Consulting 5,000 6,541 1,541 Telephone 6,200 2,566 (3,634) Postage 1,100 992 (108) Printing and Publishing 2,000 2,277 277 Utilities 2,790 2,923 223 Radio Rental 5,700 4,814 (886) Equipment and Ma_hine Rental - - -- Office Went 8,250 8,228 (22) Maintenance - Office Equipment 3,000 1,751 (1,249) Maintenan..- - Autc Equipment 91009 8,315 (685) Maintenance - Misc. Equipment 1,000 1,111 ill Maintenance - Bldg. & Grounds 1,100 1,156 56 Janitorial Service 2,700 2,683 (17) Conferences and Schools 4,800 2,919 (1,881) Insurance (Liab, Auto, Equip) 7,490 8,387 897 Memberships 700 862 162 Mileage 650 106 (544) Meeting Expense - - - Licenses ad Taxes 100 44 (56) Capital Outlay -Buildings & Structures -- - - Office Furniture & Fixtures 1,684 2,757 1,073 Automotive Equipment 27,700 28,068 368 Other Equipment 6,215 5,437 778 TOTAL BASE CONTRACT $ 4 R-, 485,578 V CITY OF ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT 1985 BUDGET - TWELVE 1408TH REPORT DBCEMBER 31, 1985 LONG LAKE ADDITIONAL MANPOWER Actual Over( Budget Actual (Under) Bu Salaries - Regular $ 58,438 $ 69,961 $2,523 Overtime 2,809 5,764 2,955 Holiday 2,472 2,521 49 P.E.R.A. 7,646 8,331 685 Hospitalization Insurance 3,854 3,399 (455) Life insurance 26 40 14 Workmens Compensation Insurance 2,963 1,963 (1,099) Clothing 6 Personal Equipment 700 678 (22) Memberships i Licenses 40 - - (40) TOTAL ADDITIONAL MANPOWER $ 78,948 $ 83,657 $4,799 SPRING PARK ADDITIO?!.;, MANPOWER Salaries - Regular $ 86,676 $ 99,564 $3,888 Overtime 4,167 3,902 (265) Holiday 3,666 3,803 137 P.E.R.A. 11,341 11,811 479 Hospitalization Insurance 5,205 3,7.84 (1,921) Life Insurance 274 302 28 Workmens Compensation Insurance 4,395 2,989 (1,496) Clothing a Personal Equipment 11050 838 (212) Memberships c Licenses 60 - - (60) TOTAL ADDITIONAL MANPOWER $116,834 $117,493 $ 659 31386.4 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratorr DATE: March 13, 1986 SUBJECT: Summary of Police Activity Attached please find a summary of four incidents that have occurred over the last year that involved either robberies or burglaries and the quality work that has led to arrests in three of the four cases. As you wi11 note the key in three, that lead to arrests, were that members of the public were willing to act either as witnesses or parti..lpana willing to g^t involved in order that the police officers were finally effect the appropriate arrest. Just passed on for you info to let you know what an excel lant job both the police officers and the pub!ic are doing in these serious cases. r Snyde ')rug Store robbery 4-19-85 2020 hours 85-1746 On 4/19/85 at 2020 hours, the Snyder Drug store was robbed at gun point by two armed men. A witness observed a man with a gun in the store, went to the Standard station across the street and called police. Officers Anderson and Johnson responded, gave chase to the suspects, and an apprehension and arrest of the offenders took place. Total time after holdup to first capture: 8 minutes. --------------------------.--------------------------.---------- Snyder Drug Store robbery 30-28-85 1947 hours 85-5866 On 10/28/85 at 1947 hours, the Snyder Drug store was robbed by one white male wearing a holloween mask. Taken were Dilaudid and Percodan drugs. Person left on foot. Dog was brought in the track suspect, but was unable to track beyond Lake Street. Case is still open and pending new leads. Armed robberies also occurred in Golden Valley 6 Mpls same night. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Snyder Drug Store robbery 2/23/86 1734 hours 86-847 on 2/23/66 at 1734 hours, the Snyder Drug store was robbed by ,-s white male armed with a gun. Taken were drugs. Although ficers were on the scene under one minute after the call, suspect was able to leave the area undetected. Apprehension and arrest of suspect has taken place after suspect called the pharmacist of the drug store to apologize. Party has been charged by the Hennepin Countv Attorney's office for aggravated robbery. Burglary of Dr. Ohmann's office, 2160 Wayzata Blvd W. Long Lake 4/28/85 1251 hours 885- _910 On 4/28/85 at 1251 hours, report of a daytime burglary of Dr. Ohmann's office, 2160 Wayzata Blvd. citizen observed a white male leaving the office that looked to have had the door broken in, got description of suspect and license number of vehicle, and called police. Other witnesses also observed suspect. Drugs were taken from the office. Through investigation, arrest was made of suspect. suspect was charged with Second degree burglary. THEY CALL US VeKwll" - I n+a Ii`wirr� —1 ;; ti -into —" rIt Refrigerator to grab the mead and fed be that wmeone must have devoured it 2 during an afternoon or bedtime 11 Attack. I base buying hmchnrm• with 11 Ali n's fat and nitro,", but with one 1/ s to me 1.et'�ae rS blot who doe n't Glee peanulbweq I to the editor another who doesn't like cheese or 3 turn and another who won't go near egg salad, I'm afraid the lunchmeat 11finds it's way into our grocery can. I• Homemade undw¢h r11L'YIis anIS? For fall house cleaning yg ou. alg oth hoot. ha t. soual- o point it's its ly on par with the Re his brow. At last he To the Editor'. Adams did. "ore veiny. Every so often I'll ■ 3 '31.' Yes. Mr. Adams did ask the other make n thweh, jot for nrxry. It m Refr :A hung his head in 1 nave attended many ory calmed two council members present d they sounds weird, luochneat -had' from and st prnuksa frowrhedand mvctmgsoverthc last few yeenand wanted him to disqualify himself. hamburger, but the Tender Quick e young mm h oust have come away with a pr eral ful- allowing that he would. should enter salt no ufmms the ground beef so the cnch loeknd up tagofduppoirmnent, if notatlimn of them have the nerve to ask him {Dl'abl r, c'mon, let him stay. even disgust, Mr how anon of our so. Whether there was any possible L ad it by Rou:"' elected rep¢xntativ" are fatting to illegal imemst or motive involved is ��i ilmd uW I bite Ward fulfill their ohhgarmul aW promises not as yet evident but, clearly. this no daub had laughed to the 'men of Orono. was blaunt conflict of interest it'd tak ys. lr. of k the role " Bo." I said. 'I think The March 10 council muting is u such. whether or not Mr. Adana a 53a1 cpzgeaat. esping, a M the policy but one small example of how the was Asked to disqualify himself by for an aochcassa yh sbet's wfir dr peo- "special interests" of some council she other council members. he had gaaine's dthere V i heir acbd, rybT" sser members ass receiving use "red a penmul obligation to do so. His United gdivni nWT" w h^e acid. carpel treatment" while the rest of not doing w wait a violation of the cor daud,n ppea , m a Iemu m. matter,' he 't they call spOna we, -poor alohs." must beg and public trust we placed in him as folhws' have ice At way a kid could ter cower for approval of our requests I am told that Adams is p for re f>ur daughter was doosrn ho play went .u, an A in hockey and for pemuts, vatumes, etc. dutioo this fall along with a number :hall. Then even If he One of the items of interest on':v of our other officials. II also comes Board Is. history and wood- March 10 Allen seas a request lot as aurpnse tome to hear that :'d still have A C a"final •abdivi-.,on, resoluGmi'ran Ati—Is aerially believes that he a parcel of Ian. As I understood the should be Ormui s WAS mayor. Cabe -uc, as infurmati , my a jd thmhtbt," 1 Iold him. dfenw.on, the request was m i ivuleforbid, we most cefti don't neat ended Y are t He vita an a la ae, privately owned pincer of'. metier "jet -sever" performing pn'P'°W atryl-rang plan A..111oftc.ole ed I"a Mao lom,palta, toe of wnieh! i ma for their appcial nmReata. do "'MuStramin The Dld� win oIRrW w sr desired by the W' rdhhll wee as a m som of p mrytm W&4Coady Cyub 1 believe that it is foi - for as as thoughts on the direction ' the 'd a dtplors m rr.'ru Now t just Ao happen., that en a community to do a little hearse distno is heading. It is' fin infor- 'Ayer a art in'Mlete. honorable Councilman Mr. IW cleaning this fall at City Hall. Any mattiu only and subjaY to cN�- Wek"Wbe valed c. Adams, is apparently • - tnl,lee' , of you who may feel tat: we need muchimiat on, Rejection. etc.. n ate now, having to bother (board adiwsysri!1 of the Wtxxthdi fresh canddates who repre�m to MUM." a cover memo said W Wrap like thin Country Club. As such. it +wed inemss of ibe people mf Ora" hn- 7W plan mentioned the distrut's times I saws fee nhmnem, haor w mcertainly been a clear con, swot of their own "special In - If be sore finished. But fliel of i shiest for Mr. Adana m. nnat." tueaae instal by connoting t luwioghave voted on any momer of direct mr at 3399 CrysW Bay Rd., C a I M worried o mmrest or possible benrhl to Wrynto 35391, phone av2 8tl'_8. aey'0 drop everything Woodhill Country Club while at the (The names Ed any Peemial can- "Fran arlhror rwdr w skse csouM 4+ I sad the other fun and sane time seryhang nth our c," own dilates would also be ygrecia I evrrelf pr'r a tAor dire{ akr ka{f eaff e !w I realist dual they nl It would mor oemorly have Any free legal nA1A1An.r would two Intl • Auto boot coo t du been a blatant cvm: ,1 M mterte he apptaieed as I expect one beck y hat m be sbasld Mr Adams hate had the of It fight. ♦ Insurance work r Lead via—h" be%iw� AWaaoy m vote . In vat" of Pet- env won to ,,w In spans of lose lorry W. W'hnl<r • Fiberglass fep8lf ♦ Rust be's eYna tat, .. Inn o « •cdy win Mr. Onmu. Mn. t� tsw wrawrossis Again. a Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission 443 OAK STREET • ExCELSIOH, MINNESOTA 55331 • (612) 4745539 FCR ISMEDIATE RELEAtiE An expensive state-of-the-art studio -type tv camera is something most of us will never get our hands on. Oh, sure, we've used those little bitty hand-held camerae you find in any tv store, but until now the studio equip- ment was oily for the professionals. All that changes on Monday, Marsh 318t, when the Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commis.:�, holds its first Open House. •From 7 to 9 that evt. , anyd>'e whole interested is invited to come to tn_ir new studio in the Excelsior Community Center (the old high schooxj, try the new camerae, watch the new video tapu editor in action, and see how special effects are done. The Commission, in cooperation with Dow Sat Cable Company, ^c.;des the equipment for use by any individual or group would like to produce a program for use on cable se ch9nnel9. „dministrator Holly Hansen will provide information classes on how to use the equipment and how to get y� program on local access channels. The Oren House is free, and coffee and cookies will be ser •d. 3/12/Hb - - --�� J r, hh 17 Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission 443 OAK ST R EET • EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 5531, 1 • (612) 474 5539 FUR IMMEDIATE RELEASE aver said "Let's put on a show"T Row'd your most Classes in how to produce your own television show for cP.bls tv will begin April bth at the Excelsior Community Center(the old high school). The Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission staff will offer "hands-on" experience in camera and editing techniques, scripting, and performing. Advence registration, with fee payment of 32b is required P.t Minnetonka Community Services, 2E1 School Avenue, Excelsior. Fro* use of access cable channels ie availabl to the feneral public, a^ucdtional groups, and local governmt bodies. 1/11/h6 hh jh MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ORONO 1"nr--4DEN. •-" )OL DISTRICT NO. 278 HEM. rEBF AV 10, 1986 The -egular meeting of the School Board of Ororo Independent School District Ko. 278 was held on Monday, February 10, 1986. Present: Dave McKown James •ni 'n James Setter Jon Anderson Will` •ing William Fenhott Kitty Crosby Lucie I., UP ,h MOTIPS by Onn Anderson, .econded by Kitty Crosby, the minutes of the January '7, 191'.A meeting were 'pproved as presented. Don. Anderson stated that he was impressed with the quality of the candidates which had applied for the superintendency and was happ- to have Lne selectior narrowed down to the three finalists. Kitty ' by expressed appreciation to the Superin,endent Search Committee and thank en for ''eir time, eoergv -nd ability Ars. Crosby expressed special appreciatton to Reuben Palm, C'.a, f the Seai .a Committee, .for his organiza- tional leadership and or alsr sure that the committee followed thrnugh on all Details. She ,-ssed ation to Karl Plath and Lloyd Nielsen for a e,ry structu,ed, thou,,tfci procea3. Mrs. '.-osby thanked Dave McKown for his 'eadership with the Board through this pros,%ss as well as Evy Zacher and Marion arson for ^.heir contributions during the interview process. iter requested that the Principal Meet & Cor•fnr meeting scheduled for d.y 11 be postponed until a later date. 'he meeting was rescheduled fur li r.3J P.M. Mr. Set.. ninded the Board of the open meeting rd,ig the Intermediate School to . eld o March 13 at 7:00 p.m. in the mischool gym. Z'v stated that he has a respon, �o the Gifted and Talented proposal but . of the state financial pictu: some modifications need to be made and ku ut rca'iy for the Board by the Mar::h 10 meets . n'^N 'IWIGN by Lucie Taylor, seconded by Don Anderson, the consent agenda was as follows• 1. Approved the niring of Tji+ske Vandervort to fill the EBD position resulting from Nancy Trautma.,'s resignation. 2. Approved the hirir o. .i:nnifer Major to replace Margaret Mar for the , Emainder of the 85-86 school year. UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Jim Franklin, the Health Curriculum was approved as presented D.scussion ensued regarding staff . me-s becoming certified In CPR and improvements/charge; 'n thf sl in pry -m. The Board req• _ted that the com- mittee provide them .th ,... informs n regarding -Curt. r't-tOPWW7W- tification in CP: MAR 3 ' Dave McKown expressed appreciation to the committee for their work in updating the Health Curriculum. The Teacher Meet ik Confer meeting was set for March 12 at 4:30 p.m. Bill Fenholt provided the Board with information regarding the Governor's plan for educational aid rescissions and the effect this would have on Orono. He stated that he will continue to monitor this area and .nis data will be con- sidered i the development of the budget this spring. The Board will be pro- vided wi,h information as it becomes available. RESOLVED, UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Lucie Taylor, to permit the business manager to sell, assign and endorse for transfer, certificates repre- senting stocks, bonds or other securities registered in the name of the Orono School District and on behalf of the Oron,, Education Fund. UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Bill Levering, the Teachers' Master Contract was ratified contingent on ratification by the teachers on February 12. Dave McKown expressed appreciation tL Board negotiators, teacher nego- tiators, Bill Fenholt and George Stubbs t,. .heir time and efforts in reaching a `air and equitable agreement. UPON MOTION by Don Anders Ell by Bill Levering, the Treasurer's Report for December, 1985 was api _a a anted. UPON MOTION by Lucie Taylor, seconded by Jim Franklin, the bills as covered by vouchers 050433 through 050495 and 049943 through 050072 were approved as presented. UPON MOTION by Bill Levering, seconded by Kitty Crosby, the February 24, 1986, School Board meeting was cancelled. Bill Fenholt provided information on the windows that are being considered for use in the middle school enp,gy grant remodeling project. UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seccnded by L-!^ie Taylor, approval was given to proceed with the prnec ' ,f window selection with consulation from Dave MCKOW and Don Anderson to b .I Fenholt and the architect. Final selection will be su"yect to Board approval. UPON MOTION by Bill Levering, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the meet rg was adjourned. i,r n �r�� ' P. C 1 c :a h ne ros y, er Approv d: 7 �,y kIe c' ow a rma - — City of ORONO 1 }s Or. !b,' \wfh SLnn ofl.a:i .woos tu+ik, Police Department February 26, 1986 r.,:. Ann Schwemmer 70 West 4th Street - Room 4C St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Dear Ms. Schwemmer, This letter is to er�ress the a',)reciation of L,Se Orono Police Departmerc, or your assistance and pro- fessional help in a telephone trace on February 24, 1986 at approximately E:45 p.m. You worked to the utmost capacity with enthu..lasm and dedication to your job in making this emergency trace which resulted in the apprehension of a suspect in the armed robbery the night befor t the Snyders Druq Store in Lc.g Lake, Minnesota. Our sincere thanks again fui a 4-ti well do.,et Sincerely, /a�y�yLR�e" a officer M rnycxuk Crime Prevention Officer MY.: cjh ���.sts•rs1�t- Assistant Chief Burmaster for Chief Melvin Kilbo City of ORONO Oo !!o'.\'uNL Sboh• of l.aa, W,,:, oed',, Police Departnient February 26, 1986 ,ut Joe Hanley 3323 Rice Stn_ee Shoreview, Minnesota 55126 Dear Mr. Hanley, This letter is to express the appreciation of the Orono Police Department for your assistance and pro- fessional help in a telephone trace on February 24, 1986 at approximately 6:45 p.m. You worked to the utmost opacity with enthusiasm and dedication to your job in making this emergency trace which resulted in the apprehension of a suspect in the armed robbery the night before at the Synders Drug Store in ',ong Lake, Minnesota. Out sincere thank: amain for a job well done! Sincerely, -A,e-t c Crime Prevention officer MK: cjh n r „lliJ6r [� Assistant Chief Surmaster for Chief Melvin Kilbo ` City of 0110NO Or; (Gr \r+rd• Shnrr of l..:k� 11i: urbrnk,: Police Department February 26, 1986 �:•: � f� ., . . Gordon Garbacz yr �.0 a.r t i.,.+, n •. 710 Mendelssohn Road Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 Dear Mr. Garbacz, This letter is to express the aooreciation of the Orono Police Department for your assistant and pro- fessional help in a telephone trace on February 24, 1986 at approximately 6:45 p.m. You worked to the utmost caracity with enthusiasm and dedication to your job in making this emergencv trace which resulted in the apprehension of a suspect in the armed robbery the night before a,, the Snyders Drug Store in Long Lake, Minnesota. Our sincere thanks again for a job well done! Sincerely, Offices M nycYY 2uk\ Crime Pre ention Officer MK:cjh Assistant Chief Aurmaster for Chief Melvin Kilbo ypF f: T) LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT /, AfCQ 402 FAST LANE STREET WAVZATA MINNESOTA 55391 TELEFHONE 61214717033 iPYNY M1N. FfIWIV[ DiPICr(W aaum,IpNp Ralwn R.NaO CNemm�n 9,wrewoV JnEnsn Nu r. No Cnenraan Orar IWwOY U`evOW. Sx'reinry .e„r.rr TO: MEMBER MUNICIPALITIES na MNr,no M.rvin ka Bay .l.n n.wrnYer DATE: APRIL 3, 1986 Mrnn. 9 Beer RaF.en Trym" Brown R UrewnwopG iunR Ve Mnn[neua MTOM.rMe Enclosed for your records is a copy of oeaNne.en won a,e.— the Financial Statement of the Lake 8—, ei'Y Minnetonka Conservation District for 1985 and an additional copy for posting. ROMnF 9rw un. V botllurO Run svw. The 1985 Financial Statement was accepted by the Board of Directors at cenEi ��its regular meeting April 2, 1986. Frank Mixa Executive Director cu Enc. 2 �N'R 4 Lake Minnetonka Conservation DSatriCt FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1 9 8 5 FINANCIAL. STA11f11ENT 1985 STATEMENT OF CASH RECEIPTS, UISBURSUIENTS, BALANCES Balance Disburse - Fund 1-1-85 Receipts ments General $53,719.95 $ 101,261.62 $111,807.46 Petty Cash 200.00 Save the Lake 58,441.26 25,963.29 9,191.06 Total $112,361.21 $ 127,224.91 $120,998.52 Advance ^aymenL of Uues Fee Advan,es Fee Deposits Balance Investments 1-1-85 Purchased Redeemed General Fund $ 80,683.58 $ 40,818.63 $ 31,000.00 Save the Lake Fund 55,311.54 17,404.91 -0- J9,i/t% UR 1 re 1///Jon Elam, Treasurer CLASSIFICATION OF RECEIPTS - 1985 Save the Lake Fund Donations Other income Total Save the Like Fund General Fund LMCD Communities (dues) Other Income Total General Fund TOTAL RECEIPTS - 1985 $21 763.50 4,199.79 $25,963.29 Balance 12-31-85 $ 43,174.11 200.00 75,213.49 $ 118,587.60 7,384.25 41.490.00 900.00 $ 168,361.85 Balance 12-31-85 $ 90,502.21 72,716.45 Sd9,97- I 51,28. t $101,261.62 CLASSIFICATION OF DISBURSEMENTS - 1985 Save the Lake Fund Projects Total Save the Lake Fund (Valance Forwarded) S 911.91.06 $ 9,191.06 $127,224.91 wnu na a, wwas.a ,.ouuerv:LLton DLsLucL LMCD 1985 Financial S'. tement Page 2 CLASSIFICATION OF DISBURSEMENTS - 1985 (continueu) Brought forward: Save the Lake Fund $ !1,191.06 General fund Administration Personal Services Salaries $..1.633.24 Auditing Services 500.00 Total Personal Services $59,133.24 Contractual Services Telephone $ 781.90 Postage 1,411.47 Printing 749.46 Utilities 212.87 Maintenance: Office Equipment -41.19 Janitorial Services 645.00 Other Contractual Sevices 2,942.23 Total Contractual Services $ 7 166.12 Commodities 6 Supplies Office Supplies $ 2,389.63 Books 6 Periodicals 160.80 General Supplies 240.79 Total Commodities and Supplies $ 2,791.22 Other Charges Office Rent S 3.600.00 Insurance 6 Bonds 1,518.00 Memberships 235.00 Employer Contributions 9.305.99 Mileage 6 Expences 1_1f1.32 Total Other Charges $15,821.31 Capital Outlay Office Furniture, Fi:tures 6 Equipment $ 4,731.38 Total capital Outlay $ 4. 731.38 Legal Legal Services $17,055.0_ Total Legal S17,055.69 Committees 6 Contingency NaLer Structures 6 EnvironmenL $ 90.57 Lake Use 1,047.83 Executive 3,470.10 Public Information 6 Program - - Total Comitties 6 Contingency $ 4,608.50 TeLal Oenetal Fund 'I'U'FAL OISBURSEMEN'I'S $Hl 807.46 $12U.998.5 MINUTES OF M' ING COMMISSION MEETING HELf- MARCH 17, 1986 ATTENDANCE. 7:30 P P lann_ng Commission met on the above date with owing members present: Chairman Kelley, Br'lows, Taylor, Goetten 6 Rovegno. McDonald .. It a following represented the City staff: Znn, Administrator Mabusth, Pssistant Zoning Adm, -tor Gaffron, ar' City Recorder Peterson. Coua1 ^sentative Frahm w:s also present. 41010 DUANE N. !IALL 1860 SHADYNOOD ROAD PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION tIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 7:32 - 8: ZoninU Administrator Mabusth noted the Certificate of Marling and Affidavit of Publication. Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed the applic,`.ion for subdivision - lot ling rearrangement to ci ate a new building site. She reviewed the requested variances vs. the requirements of Lot A: Lot area 4.290 Lot width 29.5%, and Hardcover 5.3%; Lot B: Lot area 15.2%, Lot width 34.5%, and Hardcover 5.7%; Setback for accessory structure. (Based on the assumptions of relocation of garage and shortened patio). Duane N. Hall was present for this matter and questioned why a second story deck would be considered hardcover. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron eta^_ed that the City Council considers it hardcover because it has been found teat it had a notential of having plastic or other materials underneath creating the actual hardcover. Technically, a case could be made that a deck with certain spacing etc. and ground urderneath is likely to allow most of the water to drain through. Chairman Kelley stet,:d that considering decks as hardcover har been the decision of the City Council and should not be made an issue at this time, it would be something applicant would have to discuss when the application g,es before the Council. Mr. I incicated a difference in tis hardcover calcuia: --a vs. staff's calculation. His calculations show Lot A is hardcover variance and Lot :I 0% hardcover variance. He noted that he would like to work staff on this discrepancy. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that staff feat comfortable with their hardcover calculations. Chairman Kelley ask+d applicant to address his hardships) to base this request upon. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIL ..IETING HEIM MARCH 17, 1986 i1010 DUANE N. HALL cor inued Submitting a plat map. Mr. Hall indicated different seta of properties to use to compare his proposed division with. Regarding applicant's hardships, Mr. Hall stated that he envisioned living in a house on his extra lot ano h;s hardship is living in a high density area where the bulk of the lots are substandard. Chairman Kelley asked the public to address their feelings regardinq ''is proposal. Glenn Tillotson, 1875 Shadywood Rd., stated that he would like to go on record as disapproving of the proposal and feels Orono should he consistant with ordin*aces and not "cave in". John C. Ericson, 1620 Shadywood Rd., stated that he felt clearly platted lots with sewer and water should be allowed to be developed. He sated that if a property owner is not allowed to build on these lots tt+y should be tax,. only $1 for these unusable lots. Paul Saylor of 3619 Colfax A' :nue S., Min. eapolis (not related to Planning Commission n-mber Paul Taylor), representing his mother, Mrs. Durwood A. Taylor of 1880 Shadywood, re -stated their objections and concerns as n Cted in Mrs. Taylors let�er regarding preserving the valley, view, and character of the neigttborhoDd. In addition, he stated that any major excavation of appli- cants property would endar r at least two •.f their trees. He noted that his late father's intent +.en he purchased the property in 1953 was to move into an area that had space and by payin5 property taxes on that space, pre9erve that space. He stated that compromise of the zoning ordinance would create a great incen"'ve for others t ollow suit. Mrs. Durw000 . Taylor stated that shortly after Mr. Hall pur hased his property lie approached her husband requesting to buy a 15 foot strip of property and was turned down. She noted that her late husband --:rutted her not to sell ant of their proper'y. She stated that Mr. Ha 1 approached her again in Ja r;, 1986 to encour- age Mrs. Taylor to sell some proper She stated ghat she has no intention of sel linq her property. John Ericson explained the past 40 years of changes that resulted in these 40-55' wide lots and he stated he doer not see how the City .'.n continue to deny these requ-sts. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCi 17, 1996 i1010 DUANE N. HALL continued In response to the Taylors comments, Mr. Hall stated that he did in fact offer to buy some of Mrs. Taylors property but it would not solve his problem with zoning laws at this time. He also as, rred that no der age would be done to her trees. Chairman Kelley read into the record a letter to the ?tanning Commission dated March 14, 1906 from Milton 6 Doreen Seifert of 1E56 Shadywcod Rd., indicating their objections for the following reasons: 1)overcrowding on Crystal Bay 2)substandard lot 3)City should remain consistant with past actions 4)encourage others (sr .ng precedents to seek variances which would he in dim c conflict with what the Commission and people •ish to see for the area. There were no other person present fron, 'ie public regarding this matter and the public hearin<, s close'. Planning Commission member " Ilor stated he felt ltncom- flrtable with agg: eating a situation that wituin a neighborhood already has a nwrber of substandard lots, an area that appears to be conjested, and f--ls it is hard to deal with the concepts of gra-dfathtring whet, there is no legal basis. He fel_ :t was not an appropriate vs. ance to approve. C2llahan stated that he agreed with, /lors comments and staffs recommendation deny. Rovegno agr.__ that he was uncomfortable with this app- cat'on no-.ing that the materi .I from Mr. Hatt was ,• rsuasi,,e - _ong with Mr. Ericson's comments. '+e noted rant one inq that troubles him about such arpl :at is that if there had been a shack on a separate I Jt t would be appro.ing it as a subste ial property He noted staffK memo vs. Mr. Hall's materia_, it appe— s .hat either minis lot is exa=tly like a1- th, eat or ve ve y different, something that shot. - be recon- c J. .n addition, he feels that it is i - all lot and a very difficult situation. Bello:s stated that baseP on Mr. Halls -erials scl,mltted she felt that '-e only hardship was t., ial one which was r,' valid hardship. .SLe s quet:-ned the fac' that Mr. Hall note.l that his present house 's too large but howeve. the proposed house (50'x4 -story plus basc^ienf) appears to be larger than h!. ,rese t name. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 17, 1986 #1010 DUANY N. HALL continued Mr. Hall. stated that he does not plan to build that large cf a house, that is merely the building envelope indicates. can his drawing. Bellows ;till questioned the lack of hardship involved and felt. uncomfortable in that she finds no uniqueness of this situation which is needed to rule on. Goetten Stated that she .;nJerstood applicant's concerns however :t-e felt by approving this it would only make a bad situation worse and also found no hardship involved. Chairman Kelley concurred with the comments made bS the other Commission mem.oers a,,d felt that. this lot was too substandari. It was rno%ed by Taylor, seconded by Callahan, to recommend Denial of this application based on the following: 1.) Mu.lt ..ple variances s 5ught are excessive. 2) Applicant has riot sutritted sufficent evidence of a hardship which is L.-.ique to that particular circumEtance. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. Zoning Administrator Mabustf, noted that this application would be pi,esented before the Council at the April 14, 1986 meeting. #1011 EXCELSIOR BAY YACHT CLUB DBBR I NG I S I.AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 6 VARIANCE PUBLIC HBAR.ING 8:29 - 9:07 The Affidavit of Publication was noted. Represent i nq the Excelsior Bay Yacht Club was Doug Klint. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that Deering Island was Designated as having 6.5 acres and approved as a conforming lot and privvy all permitted and conditional use permits within the RS District. However, a recent survey of the island confirms that there are o•i 1 y 2.65 acres which would require an area variance of 2.35 acres or 47%. Doug Klint showed the original plat from 1913 which proved it to be 6.5 acres originally. tie explained that the proposed plan is for a recreational area to be used by the Commodore Club of the Yacht. Club, and that they intend to control the number of club members on the island. 2 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 17, 1986 #1011 EXCELSIOR HAY YACHT CLUB continued Chairman Kelley indicated concerns regarding policing the number of people on the island, .noting that it would be out of Orono's control. Zoning Administrator Mabusth suggested obtaining input from the Water Patrol regarding the policing concerns. Doug Klint stated that the Commodore Club is limited to 300 people and are generally 35 years and older. He noted that they expected a small percentage of that club to use the island. They plan to have the island staffed from Memorial Day to Labor Day in a small office area with phone service. Callahan stated that he felt notification of the proposed use of Deering island should be given to the Mound residents nearest to the island that would be affected. The Planning Commission felt that staff sho-►ld conta. Mound regarding this proposal. Callahan stated that he had serious misgivings about the proposed use of this island and felt that there would be problems policing the number of people a I lowed on the island and he does not feel this application should be (,ranted. Chairman Kelley stated that in addition to policing, the extra traffic and dockage should be addressed with the Water Patrol. Zoning Administrator- Mabusth stated that staff has not received a site plan other than the location of proposed gazebo. Rovegno stated that this island is a record lot and questioned what the alternative uses of this island would be and he felt that based on the options, the proposed limited use is reasonable and appropriate. Bellows stated that. she felt that this was a potentially positive use with restrictions, however she felt by limiting toe use to 53 people it wou Id not be a viable use other than for special events. Goetten stated that she felt this was a positive use but there are questions that needed to be answered. Chairman Kelley stated that he felt this type of limited use was the best use for the island. 5 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 17, 198 #1011 EXCELSIOR BAY YACHT CLUB continued Callahan stated that he felt this was not a reasonable use in that the traffic would be extreme and they have no power to police the island. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that the septic site plan --•i_s realistic. Taylor stated that he felt that there were too many operation and logistical considerations to be answered before making a decision other than denial. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. The following are the issues that the Planninq Commission felt needed to be resolved: 1) Input from Water Patrol regarding location and number of docks, impact of holiday weekends, and policing concerns. 2) Applicant to submit a commercial site plan including site plan for docks, and a specific plan for policing including after hour:i protection and fire protection. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to table this matter until the above issues aie can be resolved. Motion, Ayes 6, Nay 0. #1012 WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB 200 WAYZATA BLVD. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC NZARING It. moved by Rovecno, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to table this matter upon staff recommendation pending additional information. Motion Ayes 6, Nays 0. #1013 9TEVE RATAINEN 3850 SNOBBLINE DRIVE COIMIEC IAL BITE PLAN REV I Eli Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the proposal for. an 80' x 85' (6900 s.f. ) structure for the use of furniture sales/new furniture storage. She noted that there are no problems with the setbacks, but advised Planning Commission of the drainage/retention problems within the watershed. New development must not create drainage problems for Spring Park residents to west. 6 MINUTES OF THE. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD 14ARCFI 17, 1986 11013 STEVE KATAINEN continued Steve Kat.ainen, applicant and owner of Furniture Minnesota, was present for this; matter. Fie stated that he would have no problem with altering his plan to meet the drainage concerns of the local watershed and any other conditions required by the City. He explained that he proposes a small neighborhood furniture store. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Kelley, to recommend approval of the Commercial. Site Plan subject to all requirements being met. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. ZONING AMENDMENT SECTION 10.41, B-2 LAKESHORE BUSINESS DISTRICT CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING `ht. affidavit of publication was noted. In addition, it was noted that all 7 Marinas in Orono were sent a copy of the proposed amendment. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the proposed amendments to Municipal Code Section 10.41 intended to provide for regulation of commercial operations in the B-2 Zoning District via a conditional use permit and variance procedures, so that the commercial marina licensing provision of Section 5.42 can eventually be eliminated. Attorney Bruce Douglas was present for this matter representing North Shore Drive Marina and Chaska Marina. Larry Hork, owner of North Shore Drive Marina, was alto present. Due to the importance of the proposed amendment in relation to the marinas, and that some of the marina owned may still be on winter vacation and did not receive the notice regarding this public hearing, it was suggested that a special meeting be scheduled at a later date to reveiw this matter. It. was moved by Goetten, seconded by Kelley, to schedule a Public Hearing on Thursday, April 17, 1986 at 7:00 PM in the Orono Council ambers for the proposed B-2 Zoning Amendment.. Mc Ayes 5, Nays 0. (NOTE: Rovegno left the meet ,uring this matter 3t 9:39 changing the vote ratio) In addition to re -scheduling the public hearing, staff was directed to provide all the marinas with the necessary packet for their review and notify them of the Public Hearing no later than April 1, 1986. (Confirmation of receipt. of this information by marinas to be. made) i] MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 1.7, 1986 APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Taylor, to approve the Minutes of the February 18, 1986 Planning Commission meeting as submitted. Motion, Ayes 5, Nay n. PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE Planning Commission member Bellows was appointed to attend the April 1.4, 1986 Council meeting. ADJOURNMENT 10:00 PM It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Taylor, `-.o adjourn the Planning Commission meeting at 10:00 PM. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. INI11 14 NIIFN1' %(;110111. 1-"! HIt' r 1"TT h'ISI7)NHA 1111HI.N• S('UtN11S SIiOp I.ynwoarl tk)Ulevwfd kl a nAl. Mimw•anla $:o tdo .• •ri111.AR WHOM IR)ARI) MF4r1N(I Monday, wit 1A, 19AA Iilinulrs It, la• apirovrtf April 14..-till ATTENDANCE/ 'Ile n!gutar meeting of the °uoiawll Hoard was called to ewdar at Ara$ IAK'A710N p.m. in Uw• I —lure hall of the weslooka Ctinaatonalty Center by William (irthlr,t it. I'lwinnan. M attendance were: itciK it Roard members („ttdtr,rlo, ( 1.41terg, Hallowell, Nay". Pll.oit, awl SchetltR. Others in ullet olnm a were Superialenduat Stevenson. A ,t. S((periolcwk•nl Illv,•rs, all Irlrw•ilm1%, Sper•ial Srlet.ett t►ke lrr, It-aclrrs, leach»•r uncut rt•pr•r•,cnialive,, rtroow%, v(pw•rwi,trs, soop loo)rt slaff, Itarenl%, sludrnl,, "tounulnilY norotttMrx, srinnr it zoi4p, and lire ,Y,Irh'1 P.M. )111iN Ibe ('It.,.rrulan welrouled the aodoen,e and nolyd Ilorre woodil he Iwo 111SCUSSION n41411loona) agendo items ntkled which were: life He+Ilnrlrtrl o! N—it filcn.M r, Mr. Fisher (age ndu ilem f 151 and a resulutiow, (,r llte , antra, 1 review period for llte Soprrinlendornt to be extended (094•w1s iteia /:6). tkiblirs tt soid the lirwrd nett. to resfwwwl to live evahwtw.l and wr,loes to etteml floe date for contract ro total (#ono April I to nit.• 1, 1956, as required In the official contract. I:onlirsr•h cn(•wvaged anyone witting to addreaa agendr item 19. Ih,.'untlauing sad Rc,kr,•trlg I dneational Pr -grams arw. to do sat at the time of Ito agenda Nrni. (:.,Woro, to w,ked if there sere anN •tlrr Item. Ito Ina• a 4r r. ter by 11»)-.e !rf`. Ill In The aoltkeare. Ih•1.nie Pe,htel, Cilizetn t'r.n, mittre Co I Iwtrl*•r—n. Ihaollrd 'Ito llna,tt members for Ilveir sy,p,r't to alartng tlor altrrrin awl for i.h JXXKbitR to (Heir letjet' of ('oh' et'e. "ale at. u tlrirdted Ile. Me"t-M to . far talking with Zile ronoolum t. Me donfulgor hots Im-en very irr.ilive. tilt• roods I Iloe ronomrtlee xlan N for intcre,l in frarnir•.i; rafttlinch noted ttwl if live revttlMwwi for the exic4c.nao of revocw Iaoilwl I. Iw,sed, he will Wing that matter for Ile• April Ik'ltuvod Htwr•1 beet• 1 ing. IN Ilorold Ycli lt, parent anJ tartner Hurd mcmtrr, 4Ae agwlrr,l cxl,rBdogR ttte Stoperintrodral'it c(vtlract, li oblir+ h clartricd lint thn rr�o:olton lkrw not extend lire contract, merely ptktlpwww% 11», cvnlu.,i•rtrt review for an extra month. ('lNberg staled that Ilrr ,Ialulr•, rearurc tote 5.'Irx,l Huard to du fits evaluroUael procrss nrvl I tool Utr (herd , a•uwl anohr ale Ila, Iro,•e,,. vlaNllrEs I'Iwu er„ nwit"I and S, hn.ldt r, r.t•It• 1 it.. mttOoo, it) approve t6r A11PROW1131 ounnte• of lire ny;tdar sOoo of !v.,trd 11-0114; of 1 1414t; Doll, too 41..'M%ien, a Iull , ,111 vol,. r—olivA lot ,tnaoow'n, apyr„ant COrMIlTRR ftmomMt (Vw99r1'l Et. lt.eaw•lt •r,' tb --• Mslusr a. IN liw _lowt RiltOKTtI pnrats ;4imisuy prove —,rdp tie r tkv bIONS0iA1aw1 It- Pro qwh iii— , ..•,Pf$ ld to an. raalea. t nigMietlaar. CURIMUt.UM l't t11►T'(1 ! kiaik,reil and llw Aortal tJtwow lei� 7 Owl! Mai I_ tPpnrl tw ows, , tart, ,a..w p„rgrem. TURAM)AFRTI I'IteRiltg M d wt /laik-relt teowded tha rwnit•w Ila$ ur LAool RF.Pt)NT Memo,! mere live current (somwsat Aorrwewh and ttea-,ter'. a.,wwI* at m4rd In agr.wtsi firm 13 Italk"MM aviad Pttvi, nll,rrt t/.r Neeair 4 re••erd W asoammear,, wheri, +lrle+l an /anal rural o, ►» k1 at lotto Imar lardy 0-iaoldl . M- 1'awwot ant , vw' that at total 1 t w.r low 1 orat rt> t load very irlllr Carts on !snot 14,1 a Ir"M the date !•atwr• it wftq, --0rr11Y arts that I ;u1tIN+ fi vieri(ied tiwl Ile 179,a9s —her era, f..r Ow awlsrr r.r It.- :ir'm Imp 1,: 1 r'4W Me '•hare turtw•d w W.aa/ ,err is*, ts+,t arrt w411 1.aa to 12,MA name prat wcoi ( to t,.il , all wait-, all tar4oloor s srtetl AT C. 1;1.Ut•1114F: tirville leawled awl (:eorIM Srtrltr feaft tow W.m.1 %4*- r 1~ W)MM)R prr,raleit star &carol KmrJ awl ONION! adore, Mn 1'brna lawn Il(I.tATM)N will- a ghw'rntt nattailnrN+g ma<hwe Mr Slwtt•r dowilad kin :.aa mrtltev for two aoacioint 4rv%. sled wt naeatory a/ to rplim Ml. This, WtfJ arrepte-4 skis matlaaa. IltanaeJ to~ geatieavea. and tan. Assassin Ima: tir•tr pkalatrtapdo `aN'IAI. for. W,r, calr »iw e,t I1»• h 12 Swint Sitar! rorwlr-rain P111 or`t STl11Nt3 Clrudrtlr Nrirw I—m tull,.q,, Joker Key from Odeby 11(1iu, 1 Lrtlanta CUKRIC01,011 Jeaom haw Gr»r,!.!• reel 1;.ew P40+6M Ypwtt ff.na thwart RF.Pt)RT W.., I, K11%u 7 Ma 04.4'. 41 prextttlr!) ii., h 1 1— cal dpetM rrwTir•tMina and erfl.anad ,uWr ;=t U.• tc,•414tIN 111411 arr '44d ,d SM nan IJW r'k19[t +!•",tnafift', heir ciimnwadly woo IIr world. Fire gra•.lo trariwa+o ate wiaiallt trarairtg alralt fam6t/!•s »rut W,d.Iem sa9siaR "" a6a w.a• Iiw W, icy Realer no a,.1.-per 1b. Itlelmm lord a Ud rob, 'J»r.• twos' prolr,-t. %;-Jena- tludy mololditwMg .lass aaA =lot Omb aeo aril puzole, W R;adetrs steady oaraalloaaIw . gowilt and aenwaa; fir) twawr ltr,r otralrr, and at may it bit steed aeltst pet• at Me world. hoMea Rov oracle, ?wd drra4e aa1 tllfervilrom ll taw !tk fad slat Craft lea0wr, alamt Iowa SM'101 INM&M rsrM iiorna. outs —ad" +d.dit regitwv, of lift epoch MMq Ike tJkNae +prow les(Nartss, and nary write Ilt•osw- tastilg led "rtsea ►loloaw awlnrrt ,.( retwasi. Tla irk p;rafrr, •Indy wr ted"SO U.i. ge.rgraphy, Ike Asllr•aa bmamia, lit , 11 r 41.11ie,, the Rtwashit via►v tear Mtrb red ■ and ,tome •'Amsty %nt♦ that 1t at- SI rfi at• coati tsas to one rot! v,•l.a a•tkw.. rlat v ►rr a&,,, I- tgi.l a awl rs tarot *N%t+nay. lard pr,wd mommi 41.• leallot.-A, rr_r,! tr. It., rirrsratsrtr ter 'Ina tstm to 1'Iatrlene .laevim -plot the• Social Rl'us a rtwrh nlnm 11 mtrrt oorw.•iwh-r.i at Ire mi,Mlr, <r•hrwd. RewrRtg and writing tdcill• eriwtkotp to he --I tt (, ! taboo tIe Ath with rtwriculnm. grwdre. Htwr h Mtfwtnlw IHstnnr. v ry •.nMtrii +rfi.•. iwl 6..Urwrfww iwwet rrwrAw, /wttly kw1Rt•• .- wsw with highwa\' marrt, (1nr M wH1 Tndiiy, Anripot Ilhlrwv and 14«ke,o wrwol Ile q L.D. p,wtpl Mw art r'nit,wet. 7th Rrwdrm ettwly Ampricim Ilionrv. Nth gr*drr. .,ttwt� rrrtrrartiv of the wrw!d artd -wrong eYertt• wills, w hot 1100e1'ae r», Psrfaet, are, jsr4•orm, ,trarp tow, welrNf -4 •,r (wwtrwrwrsi ar..er .-wren ritn•nlion. Reacting, ►hlnkirg prat tttwty ahjllc are alto ta,trht p►rtP••wm. inrhtNnr rNng ftnryrinrtpltjat, rtf• tinnwrtra. inr. Arr. rewdew'. lli_le to rnerinrllr-ah, rard ralwlnr<. (unnimciwtlon gtefclr to Ile Tearhet, jwrry Ikupbee, urw;r iw •ttpprv, ..r +.. *rR IMr•►iwtoorw 1phrning yorslwdrityr tree of rhwrl,t weal ,tall % klpltllfyiwg inol" i:k­, 1wri"Ift of Ikw 1,40 t wa,i amt ditttinIrldio wg fart from nt4nion. Nth Sutler. who AM rr•<rwrrh on a town in Mlrmeanaw. rwrewrl, MwrMw► Frill. vat , nw•rrwrd wftrMd the twhwr, ..a. fa tots motel. prngrs". Ewen GIIsMwV Myer, nrinA iM r,taw,•: Mgh ej,00l •I,,,tmt. inn lake inr boding 9fh It"tlr 1'ivirt which le Amerlran f;oirft, mo."l, lnih rwr cal, NeliI, I,fr-k, wM rA ttwo hot, oepw ,epee sew g6a- rear to trrlr,w/.' I;rn,lr American Iletttwy, lnih moor Anteri, an Arb,"lowet for tin,tryttt er�wi{ -PHI awl rrmiar1bp4 tow swM P,ratrf flow low •twilpwta, with Morning prr"ptnt, Ilth gtwtle jar la,t and R,eawiwn N,►hr�. MnA weal gnrksy teftm prat kttp *rwt�wsw•►trlt Arwrd at tltw f"'fittasl Nr•arrn ('Ivilisaitinn acid 12111 rrwdp (7ovemmrM aoA Freirtrru •_ ttfw kri Inlawwr,xnt ,Mime%• llerp {a attn a 91h Artt•le iwlrerlarlinw In s,rrinl G lmrr.. 1 "' to 417 of tow lAth grade .tnttent•. Otivovl trrr for '1mer1,-an 10.11v-v rMenl, 11N1 :iMrlativr, epsttittnp,i fir!" Ist•Irprinrrllstpot even ltxrgh It k on rM, live rather tlinn w rrriodrsmrnt for INA 117. r;ohliry h thanked tlw trwrhpre iot rwrapnting t i•tri,-1 7771% 4a40 Parrot. M•t Npls+rvt, waked if tow /k.t •tar,i hsd r 000gsp 4.6 rwlnrira.k a• 1par'trf. rtarM Rtiplire rum- ibint. PF.RSONNP.1. "I, Item r nvr 1 nna ritvrh terrwtrlyd the inrrlirwt that Ilip . hOM Firs: c1 Former Priam mpmlt", Frpd Mosto. neotiawsd tkai trep,,ejoW s w1 looking trwrad (loop resit. TRAP"M-M)NS ntgw..ve the r �rvmrorl Trairtarrirwee rer,rmmrnMA by it- GRtwfMtrnArnt in errnrlw Item 16•. With no Aitrin.lon. w roll call vnlp rt.stlrrl in ile Ppilett qr+Bona tlw hwafit of w—HIllr whir rr•Awtoma Mr .nan;ntnttt arlrlrnval. rfprtwrt mov,t CO-CURRI( ULAR APP(XNTMVIM i'hrtherr mnveil and kinver -„ Ord the mnlinn to argwnvr 1tw AA flue was (father wto*#, rvt .It—tpme" rrmw ootwArv.r• rwA pwrrrfoo rrn,nining 141011.1'o r,wrjrnlwr m•tra)jnim"tt n• etd,mttled he Itw• Alvwwdng tM rrgitlrwtlro Marmot am 1nw swrrtlliarrft. FOR IffS q e,,l-rintMdent w- Bete, in nEeteda item 17 dpnolyd by omjrrlfnrd nnmry Pe Ritfoerintendent •arid that the If•t wnv rewrecl at it �twn•h, lour Firia north• ewe hv4wtf nt the IrtgNdt Irpr. awl loop-srrrfwewraooilp,a ­'h the rpvivirm to the fit,wimt Cmirrrnntrnl Adviwr, wtdrh rfvr�il•I rod• ,ire that no tllrirnA Iv raja im{eet (trrtillrte it Ix rl by a Irwrler. al, lhimerirkhrtrtr It not paid a HjrenA. With on fnrlher rflar.r.•_t,.n, ttlerha"tier 0.6444 If low Anard Will w+/ntirdttey!•»< irw lwAp tow towh►w a roll Pall vote retuitra In iwtanimont npr+rnval. Awrfieg glee Ilaws rats or. Ming rNwrw uitwl. MIII'MR t'telherg moved anti linliowell errnn41 the motion 'hat toe Srh•>^t t;rrf.rirc.•h awid flwr cnt< ties ltart1s11y (treat ArfNwlrlg swrr.RneN,w1 (afood tE111C1.F. Ikwrd approve Ire eRergtion of the !ra-p wilt, Ire wrdrwtka Gwinr, 1141.1t111a) end the rp•t to frofa tow Mate ratlitow onp f pttlwg 46600 LEA4P. for, at rwe•umleel In agrrlfla Item 111. Ilse t'lriPk explained tit• 17N,paa). arrangement. 110 intrfah/red three eertiora who were rrretent- Rernirp rutt, Dor Mp{er and ilwrry Pntt. All" no Pwlher gration, or Hattroar" said •dew railed AMRP to " w%m lhev fhwgl,t ^,trim fri—tminn. w roll roll vote retuned In •rnanlmotn wrnwnvwl wewdd riwa two hrew atfrrit tbw{f la "to would arfwat►v two, "A %- U6('ON?7NUlN1; ('raMinrh weld that anymotot ple ertt rotrld wrlrlr a tte Board on thi• awkl tht v tlteuglet lhwy :"told hmoor amaw h" wwttr .irk twit : srtwtptr by Nov ♦ RF.I►Ut'INR Iteet. rk•ratrap ail ppr'tnna In the anfflenrs r1M not have a ratty of ROUCATIONAI• • 1'— lrarnrtt, GnMirtc•h wrrred an move fhe r—mutineti 1'tellerg movr•1 reehtsi rr•orlut.ipd that Peiipitle quetlkat M sw•wwed et.. 4 +•v PROGRAMS 6 nn-I 11MInwell ee.wt{ed for rwutx-ee< of (1hrirttina. Ilw rwnrrwm,e awt retf.—pie few raft orlprtlwg Atwial ♦lt nrlMt•, PO4 M)N4 rtY:tw;nm he rrfitced or ditrcw..,mena M ItrrtMtra in ormttd item 19•. ABt:t2s Slctrn—o Holed that last year rdmintalrators worked with the Ileot•iter ort(oromillm (Wfore notifying individel I~ -hen and this year "'homislraltun rho,.r to do It diffetwnlly, lie aho Mid that IW% 1, t'w carhesl title fhard Itaa ever dune Iho% iwrx rah. Ihx• i;ior will enmAc Initivnhab to pursair tamer ,tangle. with o,kgsrle liner Irxor to itte fol►r,wirtg sr•tkwg year. Arni•••.xs aArd if tlar stale doesn't cut as mw,ft funding, wosild isragram.s tx• trtxplht tack. Stevenson said tlun w:llrld be a pussituhly. Stlu"t Jim Olson also Spoke In StQpert of the sot'-1 musts program. there was further eaplonalion and clat'miaionl about the number+ us rack, „f Ile program. lest year uniftered to tht•t year. ibr• Chairman called a fifteen minute rr,-e-" at 9:50 pion t;,.t•hf- I, eased Ilse sixhtn,-e if n iy.ate wisiard t., o w.1rew the Huard on tiny other tapirs txsides title isr4s i, rr:ho,•ti,ins sn agrrxls it-ii /9. 1•oach/crxxt.el r. Kent Mo+.ser, .Ix,Ar mhoul rise agrtirts Item I Athletic l'tulostiphy Polley. I urlher dis,-umam contin4w.1 On agenda urns 09. liallowell aske,i at.uul cuts in other mcm edrdall,xtal •teasliubllra.-h clarified Itat Itiese are only r,hx•alitnal reductions wlNch follows Itse annual profi-s Other item. •ame before (lie Htterd at tool months regtdar nieetirig. (;uhltrsvh anismunred that nest week there will Its anntlser Ikisio meeting to ptare the names with the piatitiono. !'►x H,erg asked Slevenscin if such cats in music ore not dealt wtih, I ,w could the staff be used. lie maid music sei'liumis could be huill trar'k a, well as a gultar riaaa, and the loscheris) c inlet be uat•,t to .u,h areas as lutorttg, delention, Ce study halls. most aasitnturnt•. would tea it isort-atinir• areas. Mayer wanlel to clarify some tlttettltun. Ititil were asked. Ntgertkogt till sombioRtiOn of prinripalr, there is a slab haw that says every Wil,hryl will Have a principal. lit also gw•stioned Ilse Klsel W F'tl. i1i,w shcel hiindrd di! by Folly Knghi Lowlier itrws 96. 94.142 mandate, lint learniog ,ti+abied sluleats be irrtructed when they are tdwlilse'l. Mayer asked latulan if we wa,ld tired to IS, in ,omptisn,le. lie ,.td Ile wu:.'r+ ret otiontend usist Ilse Huard tie tit rum nslusew— !r !lie sILYk'ttl nerd is tlst•re. Baser ale asked why ltwre was sa„•k, a large rut in I.ryllisti. 11ti..,tt•w.r.n riti.laintd that Its average class load Is I40/1 which keeps waiting ,'la•se. within the 2511 ratio. Ile said the 6 period stay affected hits area brcvisse before students could dttiolrle top gin I.sigtish classes as rot•cloves daring the year. Hoard members etlprrased Ike *agony in trying to snake a grind 4,14.,s as. Hallowell said fair two yttar, the Hoard has kept noon mu,tr lea, l.t•rs Own ,lodes[ staff ratio warrentedt. the legi,ielt,to has 'nd srivasl eh'tricts in a spin with the a.tditiorsal cuts In state. hwakng. I.r•gtshat,x say to be conservative whsile making , ots. M1-0i etlpiabs" the famesd'iai lawlis" of <ata these Ito paw 1►0 year• novtwd is $4 41.3 eft towher ,ofs use" aid asoda Mw whwidr Mule lies*, '06 1.0% 1111. /aer'we► etas own+ not aser rest Oso-ldl lava tm-,is, WA It to 'dd 1 25 rys awk ratio Ihat tare a..t in tr ,wrstr t he -'sash In like 411101ing a wudAd to 17 %, 310 ►laNawsN mstdd Nisi atem'e the ; Vast ter lamed Ina swlkwssed ,t.ffwq clift NEWWWW to show fll% to r,ntxt. lareklry 1ha is am divers 10% in Co"Aam.:s., m sweeetarw and it" in Tow" Ittaff 111ble fladarmalhss was lahm fawn a lw.iet imsmar, oral sabritney I& IM &Vm tbomd -sal mtg. I NOW adbil the yuis%itew. Ow nY eM ewe in agaads 11am h, dlelraltdl ledald MO with ON the 0460' weathers a" "ill A yr CIh1111111Mti Chrrefd mooed snit Ilaltowdt art,.smlyd the $Noma tort like & bow IW.I.Tt�T trite/ appllal a to .6 rune . ws-atti" to faea.rete a rarrammcatOM$dn hl•1![ 110eie1hit4 to a re si gaaaitellata ptsa which , ou/,rl OWA16k the 4*AMWw of IIMQP wil an eir,aiesitory gristles, wet as tiled We mgetala Mom dla stevi,atas ►tr haw mrirtrd twat a brisrtal tAWWW"M aaow*ee be a-1 Ole the r hashed t es, ass, rtttserdatp w.1 said Naaf OewrlMtr , aaaaeW tee mesaAers aliisidd rept went a vertety lid ritojF•1 sews*. Malec moved to aom.•od and t'wift" ser•amAed 001 r aphim to merit so follase: '] Ali rrtmsortioe *remora* WMA etalviale w et" of p.aay 09150 salsItro A.rvt..ry t leasfulltoss iw No dYenL' A NO all vole an Iise en.ed.k-d r►k,14.4 von rlevattasd in Thoth: apprawai. a t.ell1arrg tasid doe atieritrets this a, a agars low lktard m■y or may hat approve t:ehtir„rh.peer. St.•tal Marker. Margrc• t lloWe, sled W" saAaetl sew weren't rleltrrwiltr.l rki it„, . :awa,111er wm1 I,awwo dxwtfk, iaaion rap for traii.ttees, said t as, o, saast/e as m*tw saomi dr, t,Km discW mg .heir groom %IN be knmat. dr .rile. wiry , ; mtnriily sea, am !dw l tr,ree rip am* all as lira eetanw/ww. Mayer void we s►wwi,.l ep:'ttiwagle rise rationalities to hold s pirod hea ,SW (oar 114N IaNir. tIn r,41 gall ante. all ow -Awns meld ,aaaru+wai aMscovwt Cuts" moved saJ ih9ss h sr-tiftilai tow ,-newts to v,irwer Oils, arr.,m: hiiNf 7r341 process ' . Si-tk.ol Hlimrd I'lerorani as Nailed to eswai,te if•a 1' 1 With wa dhr+wssoa, a r.,i1 cop taia reOM1144 i n: anew ...sse apssrwswl i heiaaes Nolte the dater r r riWg for efftee. t'U l'UiNN'Ui.AR (WhliraA weft a "N"Oor, to twang this tlxiiwtuew Hera IQ .mr too& MINIMUM URAiM after betas lahled of tow February la, Iaaa, mow{ilr wlwtea was POIWV AYKilt AIIC vess adW by ar%msr+N f M , �I ; ►11 vote Ile• trtag "I'k to lir teals, all mwaabers sot" A 11. 14A,It"(41 move;) and Plistis aecdm•tr;' themntttln to .Uhalowr agetafi Nem #12 aril* the policy recommendation utLmitted by !toe Mist —I Ccw,hes Avw•talion. M roll call vole S;hmidi and t'heirwrif vcir•,' NO and all others voted A11:. Mutiun paaues. I+.dtbr.rh muvod and Mayer sectxs,lrl in, not ow, rallowiaC wonting ,m,i•r rtro.c 1 and ?. 9. ...TM Athletic IMreclar daN abtab from !itc high s,itool ad miaiatratiae, a lint of thaw atudrwts particfpalteg in , u curricular activitteu that have mA maialawismi a t' gredc pro•nl overage for the previsrw epmrter- A list sda/l also be obsatww► for any slwk•nl receiving a failing CTadr 'Ilse Couch and studewl shell tx- requirri to meet with law.•hcrs ovidjor cuswaelor to di,ktma praWems awl academic program.. A writictd result of the meeting shall be stihsallled to Ilse A.D. by the roar*. I. Ilse .Athletic lures tdr dell accuasusaie ante regarding stwlewt, in co curricular ectivllicv who have less then a O' Crude paring average ar.:!'ur wtad receive a fatlug Crude for a period of two year, constn•ncsag wilt, the Tta 87 school year. A report shay toe sdamtlted In the School fluard dritg the spring of Ii,8 at which time this poll,. y will c,>me into fud dad coatplele review.' There was discussion un the ctarnfication of the added worthag. Ilaliowell fill parents 4"#td be notified ant meet with the trartvers andrar cndmuekw. (lublirsch felt It .i:ttuld be dome In writing. Mayer a,ked what GoNlrw h'. intent was to ad} this. ik"rsch rant Ilse uutifit•alkm process is lial—rlent end acatirmles !would he .Irt. -eel e'lu'lhrrg felt a I) policy is ntA acceplahle. toserkle .puce ageta,t phi, "Jitsoas. ll- ix.licy prew Its., by !le d;)a :k- ate., s,.(,•», c:::.:::rhg,•. 011 :101' twlents to participate. A rail call vote wn• , a114A awl the amended rrwiutiuw with all mend,sefs voting AYI:. Mayer moved to table This re,ofulioss to Akron•, it at a pi" n.r•e ti..% Motion failed for lack of a srcunA. (loon Sall.bury Myer, noted tint a committee of paresnts, students. anJ %let( rrvnewc td Itas prnhcy who Is was-si►mitted by the Mount Ccm,'hes Assoriatio s a, note•I in the last paragraph. After other minor dscusnionv a roil call vase txs Itw amended re-s.,lutino resull,rd in unantmou, approval. PHIIAXK)1'11Y OF Srhtnidt made a motion awl Ptls.t, aertrrird to xub.litule a n, w ATIILfiTI 'S re—luti�-n with Ito• one submitted a, agenrhs item Ills SI•t• twni•t Pol.lf'Y out a revi%ed Phikrayshy of Alblelics whfcts bleftk-st rr,otannrndati,w,. frtnn both policies as tiub:niltrtl by live ( oarisc, A..ud talicrt and iltr e111ti:19 philaaophy staled in agenda stem #13. (in r.tft .It vol, t,) •ub,litulr, the hoard w4et tmaniutph approval. Unlhswell move-1 :o table phi, stem ann) lit.,-* sr•rnt:.ktil. .ia,- I, It we needed unr more morills It, review IN,. Ow roll eali vole, Mayer, I'st•Lrb Unit Ilaliowell voted AYI., sod Scions 11, (iohlir"cls Asvt t'Ist.Mserr voted Ni). Motion fail, to table. 5 r+ea,n anted feet Ihpa Is a lReser '1111bl's" is nw wind* nWW to ttYi bombs. nariiee, Mod it h • .dewy,.`.trsr n. ism" 'Itlwlhi Now. Pttset. ,alle.1 sae sftw,alivess so the wAbl11blo" vwalunaw (m r rood r, 1141-well alwtatae.l *nett all atM movements; one" Ayr. AT"1'KMl)AMt;14 1M, wes the I"d reading r.f tlw Policy rioter-s of W 11, Att:ssana o CXt'l1ERg, AND ood l'assmes. TAW n►w pokey "for Weald now br ATl/t/i44$k It, MAR►UP Pte1.N'Y h.lt( I''St'S. Ants MAA►U► Kllil'♦ hills t'kebwq lewaod and as rautdl secetmaed the Nm*o a to aAeww as /amen-4 OR q.mr item Ito, lose ley rwesldaa that fhere was sail, tear t1hs.tfir to no Maaad Iii—i.mko "40 llrlaaad Mssisr,q lr,w# finmenoo a fie la.ur7 sUeauaA the Staff for ►evtsag thew gisidefaaa,a art far waAwg w,th Ito aaw:4 to d st av wIlh tI." Pulse rmtKaveaw•a/. on MIS rap rite, all mwedws —Ie4 41 F 14OW 11ATIM (#rA.ars aa,veti and tialbo*U arra,vAr=• I1• Mohr to ere11 tar ,if, NnANI) I "Itatiess of Orville e11W l: FNAwr- J, as ♦trrvl daerd AM426ea nCMfit g. to be aifotHwr tmww,t•)utooltt. fiaiRear* 2" atilt Ntpst ws Mrs ORVILLE fter'd tied/ a, -row I.n cow rolven diae is a ace-imus mouse to his Ate . FiSNE• (%iP% laaaatkww <.re admirnMe and t*e bum ' womb Slew rr washing 1 Ism 00.1 tn4 taa,tty. d Ns r.dd , all vote, wll membe t, vt.trJ waawnaa es wrwval. EXTFNSIt)N OF i'llriberC mrmai auJ fit.. is setawArit Rita asNiom as pe wooed se tge++is CONTRACT •Ft11AN Uca Ila to rNea►1 for retrbw by the Nmer4 or me At"% PCNIO61 FOR loupe+mirswirwI's ruwlrati dwptl Owl 1, IOU, ptee-bbil till Shia A.thsC SUPT ('tHfTNACT Ssgeriatewwrwt sa.k, dies, hem sawab to asrls awtwyae ass at"" live r—statklw I halherg a.iM wt•y 00% was arromary. linsibwr! wow thus a#saw the w,.vtaalf will, the st''twt ga'a'rheafawdewt an %in owtamassu, a is aere~'y to get the Y.1urd meatbers t„<ethry iarfaee Apnh 1 to mks a final rainy.. eat! art Go hue r` e4re. i t'Iwleas. saw an, deoord has a-tolatery, Pr4on abNitl to art w I%s edlasewl an saoodd bs the conteat•/. limiter. U fait the. we, a very seven" aatemtese and dwlr, tad so no eslewsMw, Mar felt of was tlotlo► sores liken as Nstacb the" /t was lmwartant to sstdua. the rw►taw Iwrwd ru am ii,,artl ,-w,ht main or mlealgirm doroma Srrlii dlMgre" mr Psl,,.11 1a t vat %lu •,v— me reiada is Postpone, least sarlessm. A SON rood woe was eWind ttiiA recanted a ter gdliewiog swMaa, mass"" - no. rusre, AM t»Maes A Y 4 gadim ,%, Avg, S be" did, Mayo ATE- Shallow resview. ar`MOM"Sta r n- M- rfirm we% a}...rwa et:7ap.4m. i " i;: : i - - •I r.rnprlo if .M.. rnnlwUrrr wo Iw f.."Wf Is, flu. p. rMwowrl r.WWr r..»4 FA,41T I. tv^ T 10 N q-rE: PVN"lk FINWHF4 ClImilot. To JVW IMVIC,-TW OW OPUTY -'Bw,&TvW4- �H6 LIR L IVAT 1 0 W 1 =TM'ILrwIVNAtt,4WVN' &INK.Or. To JRNOP INPICATOP A F 0 AN M MO XWMW A p ve�*�Figt!* *ml" TO Tom INOI*trt;, ou av X 4, E 0 NEW `TU j ,t I N N E�TA OOH 1� -7f;lo —UT H- WOM C, T0161M "TAIL �tA CO nc, #1013