Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-24-1986 Council PacketMINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 2.4, 1986 ATTENDANCE 7:00 PM CONSENT AGENDA* The Orono Council met on the abo7le date with the following members present: Acting Mayor Adams, Councilmembers Frahm and Grabek. Mayor Butler and Councilmember Hammerel were absent. the following represented the City staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder Peterson. City Attorney Blatz was also present. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, to approve the Consent Agenda* subject to removal of Items VA (1986 Joint Use Dock License, Forest Arms Country Club Addition Himeowners Association) and #18 (Letter of .-.thority). Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, to approve the Minutes from the February 10, 1986 regular Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. PARR COMMISSION COMMENTS ORONO GOLF COURSE Barb Peterson and Phil Bradley were present to represent the Park Commission. Acting Mayor Adams explained that the Council requested the Park Commission to review the Orono Golf Course and submit their recommendations reg;�-ding its future. City Administrator Bernhards— reviewed the Park Commission's opinions and facts as listed in the Park Commission minu':es of January 26, 1986. Barb Peterson stated that the Commission did not get as much information as they would have I iked. She stated `.hat the Commission would suggest sc-ie ammendments to the Community Management Plan. Acting Mayor Adams stated that he would like the Park Commission to look at additional uses other than golf. Councilmember Grabe' Stated that. he would like the Park Commission to consia,—L the long range upgrade plan. Barb Peterson stated that the Park Commission will initiate a full study at their next meeting. I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 24, 1986 PARR COMMISSION-ORONO GOLF COURSE continued Bill Sime, 2106 Shadywood Road, was present and suggested that the City consider the possiblity of private ownership and operated as a public golf course. it was moved by Acting Mayor Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to accept the Park Commission's report and direct the Park Commission and staff to proceed with further study. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT: LMCD representative, Jo Ellen Burr, Was present. AMENDED DGCK RESOLUTION* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember. Grabek, that the Council accept the information as provided than;:ing L.M.C.D. for addressing the City of Orono's concerns relating to the issue of residential dock limitation. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. LAKE MINNETONKA VIOLATION PROSECUTIONS Jo Ellen Hurr encouraged the City to support the fact that LMCD is the best means and body to deal with violations on the lake. She stated that they do not anticipate any loss of revenues from this. It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, that the Council concur with L.M.C.D.'s direction to take over prosecution efforts on the lake. Additionally it encourages L.M.C.D. to address the issues of municipal enforcement and writing of violations under L.M.C.D. code. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. PLANKING COMMISSION COMMENTS There were no comments from the Planning Commission at this time. PUBLIC COMMENTS William Sime, 2106 Shadywood Road, addressed the Council from a prepared text (copy attached to these minutes) which he noted would be published in the Pic-.,eer so that the residents of Orono would have an oppor::unity to read his comments regarding the events that led to him not being re -appointed on the Planning Commission. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: #997 EUGENE G. ROSENTHAL* 640 TONRANA ROAD FINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #1925 Nancy Rosenthal was present for this matter. 2 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 24, 1986 #997 ROSENTHAL continued It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, that the City Council adopt Resolution #1925 Approving the Plat of Rosenthal Addition. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. 1986 JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE AND RENEWALS RESOLUTIONS A) FOREST ARMS COUNTRY CLUB ADDITION HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION Due to Councilmember Grabek's personal interest, hence his abstention from voting in this matter and the lack of a quorum, it was moveu by Acting Mayor Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to table this matter until the March loth Council meeting. !potion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. B) NAVARRE COVE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION* RESOLUTION #1926 It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Grabek,that the City Council adopt Resolution► #1926 to issue a Joint Use Dock License to Navarre Cove Homeowner's Association for the period of January 1, 1966 to December 31, 1986. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. C) VICTORIA ESTATES HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION* RESOLUTION #1927 It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, that the City Council adopt Resolution #15,27 to issue a Joint Use Lock License to Victoria Estates Homeowne•r's Association for the period of January 1, 1986 to December 31, 1986. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. D) WALTER'S PORT MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION* RESOLUTION #1928 It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, that the City Council adopt Resolution► #1928 to issue a Joint Use Dock License to Walter's Port Maintenance and Improvement Association for the period of January 1, 1986 to December 31, 1986. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. E) FOX HILL HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION* RESOLUTION #1929 It was moved by C-.uncilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, that the City Council adopt Resolution 01929 to issue a Joint Use Dock License to Fox Hill Homeowner's Association for the period of January 1, 1986 to December 31, 1986. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 24, 1986 1986 JOINT USE DOCK LICENSES A) 3155 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - RHODE/ENLOW/LINDAHL RESOLUTION #1930 Susan Enlow and Sarah Lindahl were present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a joint use dock license to serve the properties located at 3155 North Shore Drive, 3185 North Shore Drive, and 1406 Bohn's Point Road. He noted that the applicant's may need to obtain a variance from the LMCD to permit three boats at one dock, which staff will direct them to do. He noted that staff recommends approval. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, that the City Council adopt Resolution #1930 approving a Joint Use Dock License to the owners of property located at 3155 North Shore Drive, 3185 North Shore Drive, and 1406 Bohn's Point Roa,' for the period of January 1, 1986 to December 31, 1986. Motior:, Ayes 3, Nays 0. B) BIG ISLAND VETERAN'S CAMP RESOLUTION #1931 City Administrator Bernhardson gxplained the request for a joint use dock license for the Big Island Veteran's Camp for a total of 14 slips. Staff recommends approval of 14 temporary slips because they do not possess the appropriate conditional use permit, at this time, to operate a camp. It was moved by Acting Mayor Adams, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, that the City Council adopt Resolution #1931 approving a a Joint Use Dock License to the Board of voverners, Big Island Veteran's Camp. on a transient basis contingent upon application of the appropriate Conditional Use Permit being made. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. #842 ROBERT ZIMMERMAN 3415 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION W32 Bob Zimmerman was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a hardcover variance of 3.5%, a 2.2% increase over the present 26.3% in the 75-250' zone, totaling 28.5%. He noted that this was a considerable decrease from the previous request. 4 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 24, 1986 #842 ZIMMERMAN continued It was moved by Acting Mayor Adams, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, to adopt Resolution #1932 approving the variance subject to staff's recommendation. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. RED INC. 1390 FRENCH CREEK DRIVE CONDITIONAL, USE PERMIT RESOLUTION #1933 Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that Ned Dayton was unable to be present at this meeting. MAYOR'S REPORT: WOLSFELD WOODS City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a conditional use permit to regrade a designated wetland into an appropriate wildlife pond. He noted that the engineer has reviewed it and staff recommends approval subject to recommendations per drafted resolution. Councilmember Frahm recommended incorporating the following finding in the resolution: The pond is located high in the watershed and run-off must travel nearly a mile before reaching Lake Minnetonka. It was moved by Acting Mayor Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to adopt Resolution #1933 approving the Conditional Use Permit amending it to incorporate the previous stated Finding. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. Acting Mayor Adams noted that there has been a problem over the years of vandalism, parties, and various nuisances in the 200 acre area and taany of the problems have been a] leviated because of a caretaker living on the premises. He stated that he recommends the Council pass a resolution supporting the need of a caretaker living on the premises which would be in the City's and neighbors best interest. Ccunci lmember Grabek stated t'; ne does not f E-e 1 the City should get ; nvol ved in a p rate matter with the DNR and based upon no documentation from the DMR regarding this matter. Councilmember Frahm stated that he tends to favor haling a caretaker on tho property, but woL!ld like to hear DNR's position in this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson stated thatt staff will research and report back to the Council at the March loth Council meeting. I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 24, 1986 MOLSFRLD WOODS continued Councilmember Grabek stated that the people involved should appear before the Council with the information needed for their case and that the City st.ould not spend a lot of time and money on this. Acting Mayor Adams agreed that: staff should not spend too much time on this. CABLE TV REPORT: MEETING OF FEBRUARY 18, 1986 Acting Mayor Adams stated that he attended the last meeting and was put on the nominating committee. He noted that they are consider=_ng a public information program where a moderator would report information provided by the area City Administrators. ' : r Y A I , -, i NI STRATOR' S REPORT: rIANN I Nt. COMISSION APPOINTKENT It was moved by Acting Mayor Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to appoint Maureen 3ellows as the new Planning Commission member. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 0, Councilmember Grabek abstained. City A':torney Blatz noted that it is questionable whether the motion passes because of the abstention and lack of a quorum. LIGHT BAR PURCHASE* Based on City Attorney Blatz's opinion, City Administrator Bernhardson stated that this would be brought hack to the March 10th Council meeting. He also noted that he strongly encourages Council to consider the alternate(s) possibility. Acting Mayor Adams stated that it was Councils' general feeling that there would be prohlems with alternates. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, that the Council approve the Police Department purchase of light bar, siren and speakers in the amount of. $799.95. Motion, Ayes: 3, Nays 0. WATER SUPPLY RATING* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, to commend the Utility Department and Public Works Coordinator, John Gerhardson for their excellent efforts in improving the water supply rating for the community. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. 6 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD F;`-URUARY 24, 1986 CARPETING - POLICE DEPARTMENT* It was moved by Councilmember Frain:•,, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, that the Council release budgeted monies for replacement of the carpet in the lice Department. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. C.D.B.G. SEWER ASSESSMENT GRANT PROGRAM* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, that the Council accept the information and approve the City's request for disc: etionary monies from the County to help fund the sewer assessment- grant program. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. LETTER OF AUTHORITY - JOHN GERHA`tDESON Acting Mayor Au.,,ms questioned who the appointed acting Administrator would report to. City Administrator P�,rnhardson stated that he reports to the Council i general working directly with the Mayor as the Chairpt--son of the Council. He stated that this would be incor)orat.ed in the Letter of Authority. It was move( by Acting Mayor Adams, seconded by Councilmember 'rahm, that the City Council approve the Letter of Aut ority as amended for John Gerhardson to act as the 16ministrator in the absence of Mark Bernhardson ender the provisions outlined in the attached left r. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. PUBLIC AUCTION - VEHICLES* It was moved �Dy Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, that the Council approve the sale of the listed vehicles at public auction on March 29, 1986. Motion; Ayes 3, Nays 0. ON - VanEeckhout* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, City Council accept the information regarding the request for sewer from Mr. Charles VanEeckhout. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. SENIOR CITIZEN DEFERMENT* REAPPLICATION FROM 80-1 PROJECT - RESOLUTIONS #1934 & #1935 It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, that t,.e Council adopt the following resolutions establishing deferrals for those named within each of the resolutions: Resolution #1934 - Henry M. Bkarp Resolution #1935 - Basil M. Young Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. 7 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 24, 1986 AMEND FEE SCHEDULE - ORDINANCE* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember ( ibek, that the City Council adopt the amendments to O;.'inance No. 17, Second Series, setting fees for Bu:!_ luing Perini t Valuation Standards and Temporary "No Parking" Signs as proposed. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, that the City Council accept City Administratcr Bernhardson's information report regarding: Lake Minnetonka Access, Police Scheduling, Big Island Veteran's Camp, and 1986 Corporate Work Plan. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: City Attorney Blatz had nothing to report at this time. LICENSES* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, that the City Council approve t.ne following licenses: Septic System Installers - Marty Bros. 9436 Quaker Lane, Osseo Residential Kennel - John & Ginger Traul 4rV40 West Branch Road Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. BILLS* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded b; Councilmember Grabek, that the City Council approve payment of the All Funds Accounts and Liquor Store Accounts. !Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. BXECUTTVE SY.SSION 7:5G PM City Administrator Bernhardson requested the Council enter into Executive Session at this time to discuss labor negotiations. ADJOURNMENT 7:55 PM It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Acting Mayor Adams, to adjourn the regular Council meeting at 7:55 PM. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. ATTI f T : •11 thy M. gz�- in, City Cler Tim A,iams, Acting Mayor AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 1986, 7:00 P.M. (*) .Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. ``` ROLL CALL COUNCIL `idfING 1. CONSENT AGENDA* FEB 24 198E APPROVAL OF MINUTES CT�V OF GRONO * 2. Regular Meeting of February 10, 1986 �1 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS 3. Orono Golf Course LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT - JoEllen Hurr Repcesentative * 4. Amended Dock Resolution S. On Lake Violation Prosecution PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT * 6. # 997 Eugene G. Rosenthal, 640 Tonkaw. a Road -- Final Subdivision - Resolution * 7. 1986 Joint Use Dock License and Renewals - Resolutions A) Forest Arms Country Club Addition Homeowner's Association B) Navarre Cove Homeowner's Association C) Victoria Estates homeowner's Association r' Walteris Port 'Maintenance and Improvement Association i 7ox All homeowner's Association 8. In& Joint Use dock License for Discussion A) 3155 North Shore Drive -• Rhode/Enlow/Lindahl B) Big Island Veteran's Camp 1. f842 Robert Zimmerman, 1410 Crystal Bay Road - Variance - Resolution 11. 01915 NEE inc., 139V French Creek Drive -- Conditional Use Permit - Resolution MAYOR'S REPORT 11. Wolsfeld Woods CABLE TV REPORT Q. Meeting of February 1 1986 CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 13. Planning Commission Appointment *14. Light Bar. Purchase *15. stater Supply Rating *16. Carpeting - Police Department *17. Sewer Assessment Grant Program *19. Letter o! Authority - ,John Gerhardson *19. Public Auction - Vehicles *20, Sewer Connection - Van Ferkhout *21. Fenior Citizen Deferment - Reapplication From 80-1 Project - Resolutions AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 1986, 7:09 P.M. CITY ADMINIS"TRATOR'S REPORT *12 Amend Fee Schedule - Ordinance Administrator's Information Lake Minnetonka Access Police Scheduling Rig Island 1986 Corporate Work Plan CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT LICENSES (:14*) BILLS (25*) ADJOURKMENT 40 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 10, 1986 ATTENDANCE 7:00 PM The Orono Council met on the:? at,ove date with the � � �°� �� ��''U� following members present: t%cting Mayor Adams, Councilmembers Grabek, Frahm, and Hammerel. Absent: i'ayor Butler. The followincj represented the City staff: FEB 24 1986 City Administrator Bernhardson, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson, build,.ng & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, and CITY OF CRON0 City Recorder Peterson. City Attorney Blatz was also present. CONSENT AGENDA* Acting Mayor Adam, welcomed students from the Orono High School 'Contemporary issues' ,lass that were in attendance. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, recorded by Cot, nci 1 member Hammerel, to approv the Consent Agenda* as submitted. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES' It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by CounciHammerel, to approve the Minutes of the Jan,iar.y 27, 1986 Council meeting as submitted. Motion, Ages 4, Nays 0. PARR ('3MLMLI SS I ON COMMENTS Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson stated that there should be a Park Commission report at the next Council meeting. PU BL I C COMMENTS There were no comments from the public: at this time. ZONING ADNINISTRATOR`S -,SPORT: fy13 PAUL PHILLIPS* 2160 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH FINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION 11916 Paul Phillips was present for this matter. It wus move.1 by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Counc.ilmer,oer Hammerel, to adopt Resolution I1916 approving the Plat; of Phillips' Woodland Terrace. Mot ic)n, Ayes 4, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE. REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 10, 1986 RELEASING TAX FORFEIT LOTS FOR PRIVATE SALT: TO ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS RESOLUTION #1917 Upon staff recommendation, it was moved by Acting Mayor. Adams, seconded by Councilmemher Hammerel., to adopt Resolution #1917 approving the release of tax forfeited land for private sale to adjacent owners (PID 17-117-23 43 0026). 'Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. REQUESTING CONVEYANCE OF TAX FORFEITED LAND FOR PUBLIC USE BY THE CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION #1918 Upon staff recommendation, it was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Actin.q Mayor Adams, to adopt Resolution #191.8 approving the conveyance of tax forfeited lands for public use by the City of Orono (PID 06-117-23 41 0085, PID 06-117-23 41 0086, PID 20-117-23 31. 0025). Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. REQUEST 7'0 DELAY PUBLIC SALE. OF TAX FORFEITED LAND RESOLUTION #1919 MAYOR'S REPORT CABLE TV REPORT Upon st.ai f recomm-_ndat ion, it was moved by Counci lmember Frahm, seconded by Acting Mayor Adams, to adopt Resolution #1919 approving the request to delay the public sale of tax forfeit land (PID 02-117-23 31 0026). Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. There was n- Mayor's repot- at: this time. City P.dministrator Bernhardson commented that Cable TV is trying to form a half-hour community program of news items from each of the fourteen communities and the poss?bi1ity of some types of panel discus sion/i.nformat ion items of interest around the lake. Actinq Mayor Adams noted that Mound is currently tel.evisinq their council meetinq; on Cable TV. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS City Administratci Bernhardson reviewed his memo regarding the Pla,ininq Commission appointment and two a ltertiat i ves to accomodate the three well qualified applicants which were interviewed at. the last meet?.ng. Fie stated that one alternat:ivo would be to expand the Planni.n,,, Comma scion from sevrrn members to nine members. lie ncted that this would possibly cause a quorum problem. The other alternative would be to appoint one person to the Planning Commission and allow the other two to serve as alternates. He noted that this would also serve as a training program for the alternates. Acting Mayor Adams, and Councilmembers Frahm and Hammerel felt that nine Planning Crmrissicn were too many. Councilmember Grabek asked the status of Mr. W1i1iazi Sime as it relates to the appointment. It was indicated that he hac-� not officially resigned but had not attended the January Planning Commission meeting. After further discussion regarding the issue of the appointment, it was agreed to offer Mr. Sime the opportunity at a special weeting to discuss the appointment with the Council. After discussion of possible dates, the Council instructed the Administrator to find out if Mr. Sime was interested, if so, set a meeting at the earliest convenient time for Mr. Sime and the Council prior to February 24, 1986. SPECIAL EVFNTS ORDINANCE CONTINUED TO FEBRUARY 24, 1986 It was moved by Actir.g Mayor Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to continue this matter until the February 24, 1986 Council meeting. COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HIGHWAY 12 -- dARC:H 31, 1986 It was moved by Councilmember Hammerel, seconded by Acting Mayor Adams, that the City Council set the March 31, 1986, Highway 12 Corridor Study meeting as a work session for Planning Commission members and Council members to be held in the Council Chambers and setting the 1: st meeting for May 5, 1986. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. STAFF STRATEGIC PLANNING City Administrator. Bernhardson reveiwed with the Council the strategic plan for the City with emphasis on the External and Internal Analysis. PROBATION EXTENSION IRVING ENGLISH Ic was moved by Councilmember Hammerel, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, that the Council accept for its review Lhe staff developed strategic planning document tot 1986. Motion, :eyes 4, Nays 0. It was moveds, by Counci lmembor Grabok, seconded by Acting Mayor Adams, that the City Council extend the probat.on of Officer English on February 11, 1986 to August 11, 1986, with an appropriate three month review. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 10, 1986 GALLISTEL LETTER* - RE: CASCO CIRCLE PARK It was moved by Councilmember Frahr, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, that the Council review this item at their March 10, 1986 meeting. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. PRECINCT BOUNDARIES* Tt was roved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Counci l,vie.mhnr !iammere? , that the City Council adopt the amended precinct boundaries as outlined 'n the attached exhibit. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. WEIGHT RESTRICTIONS* RESOLU-ION #1920 It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Iiammere1., that the Council adopt Resolution #1920 establishing load limits fn•- t« various streets effective from March ice, 19a6 to May 15, 1986. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. PRELIMINARY 1985 12 MONTH SUMMARY OF* RECEIPTS, DISBURSEMENTS AND BALANCES It was mov-1d by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmpmber Hammerel, that the City Council accept the City of Orono Preliminary Summary of Receipts, Disbursements and Balances for the Twelve Months ended December 31, 19815. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. REFUND PAYMENT OF DELINQUENT FALSE ALARM FEE* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Ha:nmorel, to approve the refund of $55.00 special. assessment payment for delinquent false alarm fee to Wayzata Country Club as payment was received after prepayment deadline. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. APPOINTING AUTHORITY* - RESOLUTION #1921 It. was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Iiammerel, that the City Council adopt Resolution. 01921 granting specific authorities regarding appoi.n -nts in Marie "J' rphardson, City Administrator. Mot ir- yes 4, Nays 0. 11 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MFE';'?N(, HELD FNBRUARY 10, 1986 SENIOR CITIZEN DEFERRAT_.S*- SPECIAL ASSESSMENT RESOLUTIONS #1922, 1923, 1924 It was moved by Counci:member Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, t!,at the City Council adopt the following Resalut:.ons establishing deferrals for those named within each of those resolutions: Resolution #1922 - Irene Gladys Woytcke Resolution 01.923 - Lawrence Josepi, Fyn:^niak R-solution #1924 - Maybell N. Kohls Notion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. BURNING PERMIT FEE* - ORDINANCE NO. 17 - SECOND SERIES It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember ilammo re 1, that the Council adopt the amendment to Ordinance No.17, SE-cond Series, setting a fee for annual. burning permits. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. LEAVES OF ABSENCES*- TERI HAAB It was move-'. l.y C_ounci.lmembe- Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to g:ant a leave of absence to Mrc.. Teri Naab for balance pericd of 90 cal.ander days from the date she ).^aves that i.3 not covered by sick 1^ave or vacation under the conditions as outlined. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. LYLE OMAN It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to grant a leave of absence to Mr. Lyle Oman front February 5th to March 18th, 1986 under the conditions as outlined. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION Council accepted City Administrator Bernhardson's Infcrmaticn report regarding: C.h.B.G. Assessment Crant Program, Emergency Preparedness, Posse System, and Deering I^land. City ArhAnist.rator Bernhardson reported that regarding the Deer,nq Island matter, 'Zoning Admini0trat,)r Mabust') has cont;: fed Mr. Paul Scherber by le! t r and he has contacteo the City to indicate that: he •� 1 1 be making applicatiot: for a conditicna.l use permit. CITY ATTORNRY' REPORT: City Attorney Illatz h:id nothing to report at this time. MINUTES OF THE: RE11,11I.AR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 10, 1986 LICENSES* BILL` AD►70URMNENT 7 : 4 7 ATTEST: It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Courici lmember Hammerel, to approve the following licenses: Cigarette Licenses: Grant Russell Wenkstern, Lakeview Golf J.G. Holtz, Jimmies Inc. Steven M. Martin, Martin's Navarre 66 William W. Wear, Orono Shopping Center Kennel Licenses: Irwin I:acobs, 1700 Shoreline Dr. George W. Ronald, 2480 Old Beach Rd. Frank & Sue Kokesh, 41GO Watertown Rd. John & Patricia Lanier, s960 Fox Street Lisa Carlson, 2344 Olive Avp. Maxwell E. Alvord, 960 North Brown Rd. Robert S. Waag, 4760 West Branch Rd. Motion, ".ves 4, Nays 0. It was moved Councilmember Funds Accounts 4, i;%ys 0. PM It was moved Councilmembei meeting at 7:47 by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Hammerel, to approve payment of the All and Liquor Store Accounts. Motion, Ayes by Acting Mayor Adams, seconded by Frahm, to adjourn the r -gu 1 ar Council PM. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Tim 1,dAms, Acting Mayor 6 ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING - January 26; 1986 o� rtt _ Members Present: Terry Morse, Lee Erger, hiarianr. �l�n�lfett�� 1 Bradley, Bob Kost & Barb Peterson Members Absent: Les Kelley & Virginia Sweatt SUBJECT: FUTURE OF ORONO PUBLIC GOLF COURSE CONCLUSION- Tic Members unanimously support the continued operation and maintenance of the Orono Public Golf Course. SUPP(IRTING OPINIONS & FACTS: 1. The Members unanimously agree with the --ommun.ity Management Plan, June, 1"180, Chapter C8, Page #2, Scope #2, which _.t ates. Park land once zcquired becomes the permanent responsibility of the City, ur another, government agency, for continuing maintenance expe-ise, and for permanent loss of tax income. 2. The Private Golf Course Policy statement in the Comrr.ur.ity Management P13n, Chapter #8, Page #12, Scope #8, should app..y to t Orono Public Golf Course. This states: THE CITY WILL ENCOURAGE k.E'I'ENTION AND C.ONTiNUED OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE GOLF COURSES. These private facilities provida major active recreation in the City and in addition provide aesthetic open space and open vistas tc the benefit of all adjacent property owners and the public alike. The City will discourage conversion of these facilities into non -recreational land use because of t.,ae benefit of thi-; recreational opportunity and because the Cit,, has limited pu.,iic services necessary for accommodat.,ig any othor use. 3. Financial records indicate that the Golf Course operates at a profit and does not represent E financial burden to the City budget. 4. The Golf Course is the City's largest contiguous year-round recre,itio,ial resource. S. Orono Public Gulf Course is historically significant because it is the first public golf coarse in the State to use (,rass greens. 6. The threat of sale and development of local privately owned golf courses contributes to the importance of Or.ono's Public Golf Course. As the privately owned course's disappear, demands on Oror,,,'s Course will increase. 7- The Park Commission encourages the study of the Golf Course to assess ci.rrent & future user needs and the feasibility of future improvements. 22086.1 6� TO: Mayor and City Council ( FROM: T9ark Bernhardson, City Administiatot DATE: February 20, 1986 SUBJECT: L.M.C.D. Residential Boat ordinance Court(;ll kRUING r P. '.ttached please find a copy of the ordinance as passed by L.!I.C.D., which did delete the requirement for a special L.M.C.D. ,esidential permit and strictly gces with the registration on the boats to determine if lakeshore yards under 125 feet can have 3 or 4 boats if they are registered to the owners. Should you have any further questions, please feel free to discuss with ,JoE:llen on Monday night. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by that Council accept the information as pz-ovided thanking L.M.C.D. for addressing the City of Omni 's concerns relating to the issue of residential dock 1 imi tat.on. Ayes __, Nays ___ ORD1NANCE NO. _/6 AN ORDINPHCI: RELATING TO THE NUMBER OF WATERCRAFT W111CH MAY IE KEPT AT AHY DOCK OR MOORING FACILITY; AI•IENDING LMCD COLT; SECTI.Ot' 3 . 02 , SUED. 9 AND 10 The Board of Directors of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District ordains: Section l.. LMCD Code Section 3.02, Subdivision 9 is amended to read as follows: Subd. 9. Shoreline Requirements. ai General Rule. No new decks or mooring areas ethershall be constructed or established which provide space for or are used for mooring or docking a greater number of watercraft than one for each 50 feet of continuous shoreline in exis- tence on May 3, 1978 unless authorized to do so by pecial density ermit pursuant to Section 3,081. When measurements determining the number of watercraft allowed result in the provision of a fractional watercraft, airy fraction up to ar.d including one-half (�S) shall be disregarded, and fractions over one-half ( ) shall allew be counted as one additional waterc.:Aft. b) aecial Rule `or Sites in Existence on Au ug st 3(:�, 1978. Vnless _-a c rc:_iter number is authorized tt►e provisions of par.a raph a) above, u_e to :feesr-er newer two watercraft- may be kept at any dock or r►•ooring facility wheh--i-�-ftfierwiee--itT-<�cm�� i�trEe--wYth-t�lr�-s e e d e - -eitd- -ti+ i tr -the - -ea-i- - the - -ifx-s i- • I*M - - u se eenfrel-tr�teex^ity--eixi which is located on a site (as defined in Section 3.01) which rsj was in existence on August 30, 1978. c) qpecial Rule for rites Established After .:august 30, 1978. Unless a greater number s auti►or P� b,y the provisions_of. Paracraph a) above, up to fear-er fewer two watercraft may be kept at any dock .ir mooring area fac ilit� whieR3--t�--e+}�ecKi�e--i-tt-c�e -r+tth t h i st h e- i t arm-" 4's- -f - -t•tr - k 2t 1~ - f a n d c►ae--e th�rrt�-- Ni whic. is 1acated on a site (as defined in Section 3.01) ^stablished after August 30, 1g78, provided there_ s a resider.ce on the site and the dock and decking rights is are owned solely by t I I e residents +.>f. thiik site:.. �� d) Additional_ Watercraft el., "WC-111ce for Watercraft ' Owned ')y Residents. T1. ,e or four watercraft may bt at docks or moorings describes in paragraphs above if all watercraft are owned by and re igstered to the residents of the 'site. Section 2. LMCD Code Section 3.02, Subdivision 10 is amended by deleting the following: 6etbdr-3-0-:---i�o-perser--sire-lam--cell T-Tefntj--c�&-}ease f.er-the-storage-ef-bests-er-Mntercraft-any-space-within doe k-doe-Brea-iA44�-t wni--&t--eennnere.i&1--deeksr•-19rev4d- edT-heWeverT-that-sneh-spsee-:nay-be-rented-er-leased-et decks-of-b}�nrt�+►efrts--s�r3rt-iy--fvr--ttte-stvrac�-ef-heats-er watercraft-owned-by-residents-ef-the-apartments•: Section 3. This enactment shall be reevaluated and reaffirmed or s all terminate two years from its effect ve att�e. This enactment is in effect from and after itet passage and publication in accordance with the enabling act of :he District. It is enacted by a majority vote of all the members of the Board and has the effect of an ordinance. Adopted by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board of Directors this ,2,2C4 day of /S/ Oe•ee-tr �,�► s� •P Cha rman ATTEST: /S/ F&. WA' M/AA Frn�t Mixa, Executive! irectur Dated of publication: .2 3 -It. 22086. 2 TO: FROM: DATE: tlayor and City Council Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator�,.l' February 20, 1986 SUBJECT: Take Minnetonka Violation Prosecutions OUNCYA 110ETING F 2 ,1 1986 Attached please find a letter from L.M.C.D. outlining the research they have done on the prosecution efforts of the individual communities regar3ing the issuance of tags on the !a k ,� . T t is presently the proposal of L.M.C.D. that they take over prosecution of all the tickets. The benefit of having L.M.C.D to the prosecution. through one individual is that they coulc. p�3ssihly keep better tabs on all the violations on the lake together with the fact that one individual would be very f.lmiliar with the ins and nuts of th- special needs of on -lake cases. It is expectee that if this is to go into force that the re �e ,3enerated M )u ld go to L.M.C.D. to pay for the pr.osecut, r ial , :s rather than coming to the cities for such. In a revs • of fin= generated in Orono in 1984 verses prosecution costs it proba., costs the City more to do the cases than is generated in revenue. Therefore it is the staff's position anJ recommendation that L.M.''.D. take over the prosecution of all ors -lake cases. -here are two other issues related to enforcement on the lake `,:hat should be additional' be pursued with L.M.C.D. a. Showi icy Enforcement - Several months ago JoEl len Hu ha � requested L.M.C.D.'s legal counsel to give a wriLten opinion ro.!l.ating to City :)f Orono's ability to enforce violations on the lake. Under the legislation granting authority to L.M.C.D. it reduireu that they contract out such enforcement and therefore short of a contract oetween Orono and L.M.C.D. it's be-n the City's position that we can not the on-lakr> violations. b. Violations Under L.M.C.D. Cole or Minnesota State S_taCdCe - !3er_ausC t7�'thr-�-vaclueneasvOF certatn dsp- t.s of file t.�a.C.D. codes it is our understanding that the :dater Patrol often writes tickets under State Statute rather than un,ier the i,.M.C.D. code. The result of this iss.ie is that. the moni- !_ t<-)r the f ine>,; g > to the State ra ther than to r,.M.C.D. ot. the loc 3 i communities. It is u lgest,> l r'�at the .l a k of c 1 a i ty of L.M.C.D.'s . 1 .0 ordina-icPs be (-:.eared up anti/or that they adopt the 74i-nnesota State Statutes by reference with their own L.M.C.D. ~jmbers and that working together with Water Patrol t they jointly work to have the enforcement agencieL Ate the violations under L.M.C.D. code. Should you have any further questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. cc: JoEllen Hurr PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by _, that the Council concur with L.M.C.D.'s directio to take over prosecution efforts on the lake. Additionally it encourages L.M.C.D. to address the issues of municipal enforcement and writing of violations under L.M.C.D. code. Ayes , Nays __. I LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 402 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 553�t /47, 333 BOARD MEMBERS rlohrtrt Trplon Brown. Charrmnn 3 r e enwtend Robert P Fiascop, Vice Chairman Shorewood JoEI en Hurr, Secrelary Orono Jon Elarh, Tteasurer Mound Edward G Bauman Tonka Bay ponald F Boyntun Minnetonka Beach Frar'k de Monchaua Mlnnalnsla Richard J Garwood r)eephavnn Autlrry Grsvold Wayzata Hon Kranmer Spring Park Robert K Pillsbury Minnetonka FTuberl E Slocum Woodland Rtchard .1 Soderberg Vrcloria Carl H WPraser Excelsior TO: Member Municipalities DATE: January 21, 1986 �7 �.J � �• iii >L�1�41 DIRECTOR � " i JAN 2 3 1986 SUB?: Prosecution of UICD Violations on the Lake The District has been studying its options in the hac.dling of presecutions of Water Patrol citations issued under the UICD Code on the lake. Atter a review of a report from the Hennepin County M-ricipal Court o,1 a fine studv and disposition of tickets issued by the Water patrol on the bake for 1984, summary sheet artached, and an estimate of the costs which would Have been incurred by the District prosecuting these cases, the District has come to the conclusion that it would be beneficial for all concerned if the District handled such cases directly through its own prosecution system. It is believed that a more centralized sysLem would provide the District mere and timely information about the effectiveness of its regulatory program on the Lake, as well as provi,.ing background for any needed changes In rules and regulations. It would also result in stream- lining of the procedures involved, and iml;rove enforcement coordination with the Sheriff's Water patrol The Water Fatrol concure in this conclusion. Unless some of the villac,es wish to discuss the program further, the program will become effective in 1986. If your municipality wishes a meeting or, the subject, please give its a call at 473-7033 and a meeting will be scheduled with UICD Board members early in January. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Robert Rascop Chairman att: r,ummary sheet, letter re costs c: I -MCI) Roarti ►temberp Sheriff's Water Patrol �U�,151�45 t. tA...D• AJMIHISIAATIVE OFFICES Mule of �llliunrtsulu �aetutrNiu cliuttttt� �lllitlticiNt�; tliut�rx �letu►epi.►t tltuuul� llUabertuuru! Qlenf>er jlilitutet►polis, jL14u►eoaln 55,187 UNA July 12, 1985e;t;; - . e, Frank Mixa L'•xecv Director ;..�!. �etortka Conservation Distric�� 402 Street Wayzata, MN 55391 Dear Mr. Mixa: Eariier this year you requested that we make a cumputPr search of citations issued by the Water Patrol under the Lake h-iinnetonka Conservation Ordinance ;luring 1984. Attached is a �owputer report which we hope meets your needs. Tile data was taken from the disposition file an-i a separate report was created with fine and court totals for each cor inanity. Below is a summary of the community totals which were taketl from the attached reports. Court Revenue Paid Comi'lunity hints Cost Community Less costs Wayzata $ 890 $ 24 $ 866 Minnetonka 680 22 658 Deephaven 125 4 121 Excelsior 5UU 26 44 Greenwood 330 29 301 M innetunka Beach 260 ?6 234 ..iinnetrista 50 4 46 Mound 604 2' 576 Orono 9U3 88 815 Shorewood 3U 2 ?8 Spring Park 700 30 670 Tonka Bay 285 q 276 Woodimid 30 1 29 $�5, 381 293 _ _ 5',U94 In addition to the violations written mider LMCD Ordinance@ by the Water Patrol a significant number of citations were written under the state statute. During "994 the total revenues collected from violations written under the state statute ►-y the Water Patrol was $2,713 with the revenues being, divided between the State and County. 2000 First Bank Place West Mtnnenpglis Minnesota 55402 T efephwirt (612) 333 0543 Telecupie 1812) 333 0540 Claytrhr L. LeFevere Herbert P. Lefler J. Dennis G'Brren Johr• E DraWz David J K-wv dy John 0 Qean Glpr;•-. E. Purdue r.whnrd J Schieffer Charles L LeFevere Herbert P. Lefler III Jeffrey J Strand John r; Yressel nayf* Nr,lnn Mictiael A Nes. Brian F. Rice Lorraine S Clugg James J. Thomson, Jr. James M Strommen Mary C. Nielsen Tarry L Hari Ronald H Bany William P Jrxdarl Susan Dinkel Mutsbery Kurt J Erick%on William R Rkr9flerud Thomas 11. Gett Rtnhwy D Anderson Gary R. Bryant-Wotf 1 I•.„l, ,.d„�.rt I..,� i.rrarrr October 17, 1985 Mr. Frank Mixa Executive Director Lake Minnetonka Conservation Oistri.ct 402 Lake Street Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Re: ?..MCD Prosecution Dear Frank: Recently you asked our office for an estimate as to what ..ees a ight be incurred by the LMCD for us handling all of their prosecution matters. You also enclosed a sui-itmary of court dispositions For citations issued by the water Patrol during 1984. Based on a review of that disposition summary and our own experience relating to the handling of prosecu- tion matters, we would estimate that we would be able to provide proser.ution serv!ces for the LMCD (assuming a similar case load as 1984) for $2,665.00. This woould include attendance at ar aignments for the District, atten- dance at pretrials and the handling of court trials. This would also include the preparation of formal complaints for those ci• tions which aro issued 'Co which the defendant does not respond. of course, should the prosecution load for the district increase substantially our estimate would change as well. Should you have any questions concerning any of these, matters, pleas do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for Lhe opportunity to provide you with this information. Yours very truly, Charles L. LeFevere CLL:np ocr, 119(.)5 L..lM.C.!,.%. 't" ('pt f ehruary 24, 1986 Attached to this statement is a copy of my letter to the Orono Council Planning Commission, City ,�:anager, and Staff, dated December 23, 1986. +,hen I was informed that I had not been Teappointed to the Planningr Cornmi�sion even though two of my colleagues with identical term expiration dates were reappointed, it became obvious I would be dropped. My terra expired December 31, 1985, and s'.r-e Mayor Butler sai" she was "not comfortable with Bill Sime on the Planning Commission" because she felt I used my position for other enneavors, it seemed like my letter of 12-23-85 , gracefully accepting my banishment from the Planning Commission,should end the subject. On February 18, 1986 --57 days later-- The Orono City Manager conveye:j to re a message from the Council that they would like to interview me for the Planning Commission position that I had served in for the past three years. This strange deviation from normal policy piqued my curiosity so I polled some Council members. Sure enough, it was clear that the majority of the Council is, and was, positively and unalterably opposed to my reappointment. The February 18, 1986 issue of the Picneer carried a report on the February 10th Council meeting and said in part: "The Council also expressed concern over the apparent misunderstanding by commission member Bill Sime re- aarding the appointment of new and reappointment of existing commission Timbers. 01scassion was tabled with a special meeting to be arranged soiey for the discussion of these matters." I can not possibly imagine ,ih,t earthly purpose my "interview" could server when the majority of the Council members have already made up their minis. -his :neetinq is, or was, scheduled to take place some time in ",arch. .)ver two months after the expiration of the term V have served the residents of my community well during my three-year term on the Planning Commission. The chairman, at the close of our December 16, 1985 meeting indicated his willingness to write a letter to the Council on my behalf. My colleagues indicated they would also support my reappointment. Une Council member who is opposed to my reappointment. told me I should be commenced for my contributions to Orono. Why, then, are tha mal -�rity c;f the 'Ptineil opposed to appoint.nq me to a second term? That same Council member said, "E+ecause Fill simo is not a` tean't•layer." Page 2 2-24-36 That is political double-talk ) which freely translated meals that Bill Sime had the audacity to solicit public participation during the excessive increase in our real estate taxes, during the debate over replacing the Hennepin County Assessor with a local assessor, and during the debates over assessing up to 50% of the Crystal Bay sewer project to all of the residents of Orono instead of just the benefitted property owners as had always been done historically. And, as one public official lout it, "Bill Sime did that without Council approval." Vhen r said I strongly felt that no one should serve on the City Council who does not enccurage public input continually, the Council member I was talking to replied,"If you feel that way, perhaps it is utter that you are not on the Planning Commission." While,publicly, each member of the Council will say they have an "open" Council and wplfrnmP r-1,hl it irli%tit, T nllest 4n., ti,�r actions don't show that. I have been threatened by more than one City Official because of my activities stimulating citizen participation and citizen involvement on important City issues. Items have been suddenly removed from the meeting agendas in fear of public participation. And I have not been reappointed to the Planning Commission --not because I didn't do the job properly, but because I am openly on the "team" of the residents of Orono, instead of on the "official team" which will make decisions for the masses without interference. As one council member put it to me early on, "Our Council does not want a bunch cf irate citizens who are ignorant of the issues, to attend our meetings." I have also served for the least three and a half years as a member of the Capital budgeting Task Forces An adviscry body of 10 volunteer citizens who review pre os- i c-:iE i + al r :. pf,nditure requests by every department of Hennepin County and make recommendations to tl._4 P:-_ar of Hennepin County Commissioners for their annual buduPt. I was awarded their CITATION C)F HONOR in resolution d5- 12-868 dat December 30, 1985. A fine letter accompanier4 tt:e sonar 3 expressir, tl,e :1e&,,,vp.Ln Cuunc.y ;:commissioners "appreciation for services an<< counsel to Hennepin County". Several members of the CdTF sent me flattering letters regarding my contributions, and the Chairman of the CSTF commended me in his letter for "looking out for the interests of the Hennepin County taxpayer." Yes, we had some degree of success cutti.zq taxes at the County level. I also feel my efforts on behalf of the residents of Orono have been partially responsible in saving our "Crucified Taxpayers" hundreds of thousands of dollars. Isn't it a shame that my rt,ward for championing the tights of the citizens of Orono for the past four years, fighting to reduce their taxes, is to he droppe-1 from the Planning Commission ? Isn't it a trauedy that some of our elfrcte.'. officials are Opposed to citizen Earticipation ant] citizen invclvement -- except by invitation?? Page 3 2-24-86 As one Council member who favors citizen input admonished a "Closed Goof Council memr)er, "What are you afraid of? These people are your neighbors! They have a right to be heard! It is my opinion that the residents of Orono warit to he heard. ".'hey will not tolerate the high-handed "ciosed door" policy practiced by some members of this council. We have had elections in Urono, but to the best of my knowledge we have never had a coronation. The citizens of Orono will not qive up their right to be heard on any issue or at any public meeting which impacts on their lives. In the last elect.on, Orono voters plainly indicated their desires to be a part of vital isP,)Ar in the comrr:vnity. I call upon, the "Crucified Taxpa-er s" and the voters of Orono to )oin me in finding candidates worthy of our trust who believe in government "of the people, for the people, and (MOST IMP"PTANTLY) 9Y the people." Let us elect Council members who will be responsive to our views and our input, even if we are "ignorant". WILLIAM J. SIME, jk. 2106 SHADYWOOD ROAD • WAYZATA, MINNPSOTA 553D1 • 471-0296 December 23, 1985 Onen letter to the City of Orono Counctl, Planning Cor1ri lion, City Administrator, and Staff. T)-? past three years on the Orono Planning Com:^ission have Leen very eniovab�l.e. My t.han.ks to those of you who arve me the chance to serve my cornmunity. In r^y opinion, I have served the residents of Orono faithfully tine, well. y heartfelt thanks to my co.Lleaaues for their kind words and surport expressed after the PC meeting December 16th. That nonF:it touched me deeply. To be well thought of by the people ..ou hav(. worked with for three years is a wonderful tribute. I 4m proud of they t-hincrs I have had a part in accomplisning that have benefited the residents of Orono. I have served my Com.."iunity FIv 1. Organizing many of our taxpayers to protest the excessive increases in property valuation four years ago. 2. M vocatina that the Hennepin County Assessor use the appraisal princip�e of cash equivalency. Assessors throughout the state are now mandated to use this principle effective in 1985, thanks to the State Legislature, 3. Spearheading the stru,7ale to attain a local assessor instead of Hennepin County. 4. Solicitinq the ruinirns of Orono citizens who were opposed to the city-wide assessment of a percentage of the Crystal Bay Sewer Project which could have set an unacceptable precolent. My actions in the foraaoina have teen interpretel am `usincq ry Position {?) r,n the Planning Camr^ission irproT.--eerly'. i,- I a'-•- 'grands•_andinw for political Brain". tinfortrinately, I jtist can not be a 'rubber stamp', and I don't feel a person should give up his rights as a citizen to voice his opinion iust because he is on the Planning Coru iss ion. I WAS not politically clot i- vatol. I dial what I felt was right and what would bent serve the cor"rtunity --- not me personally. Tt was expensive and lonely. I have been told that I will not he re -appointed to the r'lan- r.inq Comission. I can live with that. But my motives were pure, and I do feel I have ir^proved the lot of the 'crucified taxpayers' of Orono in very obvious and demonstrable ways. The residents of Orono have been saved hundreds of thousands of dollars oocause of my actions. J art proud of r+y c.ontriNitions to the citizens of Orono. It truly saddens me that the Council has misunderstood my motivws. I really hellove I still have a lot to offeer and could 12/23/85 gage 2 serve r^y community longer. On thi other hanl, the warm resarl I have felt from PC menbe-_ s, j _ F, and r.,,y neigl bars in the communJty fill me with warrth and a sense of real accomplishment. I accept ray banishment from comlunity service reluctantly, but I think gratefully c,f how much money I will save i.n Mailings. Thanks for the opportunity i 1 Sincerely, 4illiam J. Sinrn, Jr. wis/v m C00UNC11 401TING �=E8211186 To: Orono Council Members RR From: ;;eanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator !AITY OF ORONO Date: February 20, 11186 Subject: #997 Eugene Rosenthal, 640 Tonkawa Road - Final Subdivision - Resolution The applicant has fulfilled all conditions of preliminary approval and has filed with the City staff all necessary submittals. Staff i%as drafted the enclosed resolution for your consideration and recommends approval of the final plat of Rosenthal Addition subject to the findings and conditions set forth in that same resolution. 200 ROSE' '-'.qAL ADDITION - ` c; i s e• r, tip OCK . 1�' i t ,rt r; '1. te.S +ti,.i t71 � � i\ .�• ,n, COUNit' 40A0 N0. fJ5 SC A BFAA(IVGS SyIOwN dF /[Il30et i1 'K'.f N[Y+'S t9 t.grn G. Rt+MC►/i M! i w. • L R.t.+n n11, .-•:eMC I'S Pmsl ►'1,^. ME Crtlr7 teN, f ►1.1 Mwrtv.' Me :.:t••!! C IU.wn:. 6•p:r/tam. !-toget v t4 fCtwlp-.aur,flea ..ew+t. ::twtw f. (M MASS itlw Of 3_!0 mmmm t MC SIM �.Ity of tMlgpla• b Hi- CMwIt :M; .:! 4.Stm^ a mr-rtct fNOW4 " Oft..; tl :h.' tilt e. t.b aft ft t'-, , t MMM'S R/w(, lint ?I rt. vw, ftpwli �t11 lift C/ ,ft k'L Ms tttAilSMG by J.s1(t.l 6f -ft fp1.Q it 1..a lyf of a —gale' c ♦ttfK1, ia9t )A, iw ttn ofJl:l lif tM rw.nf �rcrrtle- a fate Ilbte.ptq (C' I- Kmrellli to t%f Het •A�.fef ''lie O- of r.mry N tM o1f!CI t•t t11 (ptrty bcm0r 1► m0 Ie- MIS co—ty• �1eQ tat. $— to i1 SM.Ifei w4 plat,.! p /'1Axi1t4 AWIt10e. attl 1w Mrt, dMt= Wtl heltatl to tat► pmll. for (W Sfat(S RINK t,Ct6t -_yCffwr it.ersinp. ac 1.lttty WCr'=1 K Tbrw ew l-.71 elK. lS13 ayfrRf 1♦Itl (oplM C e..."•.1 eM o.K' L. ftm � f"l M�.utl en, . e. M-1 R•-Ktb Y( tC►!r CIlt t><if tlty ISM cow fir-.1}eat �W py�r� -� e!1C "fillI1• W.—t11M-�- fg16 /M/• I MrVI1Ttt C.Iyerlt Wn, Ml tav3ltl (MM y�..uL3 b t1i.: irlC "'7M' etf ;; ri, entl Itf m.yJrStf Sral 11: be fltll.lm ►-'Il.d t►IS �_ 4l of City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT .,F ROSENTHAL ADDITION WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WH-_.Et.S, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe developmenL_ of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Coi,ncil has considered the appli -3tion for a sub&_vision by Eugene G. Rosenthal, the subdivider; and WHEREAS, the subdivision has bee^ found to meet. all standards of the LR-lB coning district finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that will allow its use as a single family residence to be fully developed without the need of any variances, and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed al.1 requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including. 1. Dedication the plat of drainage and utility easements. 2. Dedication on the plat of right-of-way for a public road shown as County Road No. 135. 3. Dedication to tl�e City of a Flowage and Conservation Easement providing for limitations on the use of wetlands described there- in and shown on the plat as "drainage easements". 4. Payment: to the City of a Park Dedication Fee in t.,? amount of $200.00. 5. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat easements and covenants in the amount of $150.00. NOW, THEREFORE - IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Rosenthal Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota; subject to the following conditions: 1. An access permit must be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Transportation prior tc the issuance of a building permit for Lot 2 by the City of Orono. 2. Lot 2's property lines Flo not abut the lakeshore of Lake Minnetonka, therefore, the City's ordinances designate Lot 2 as non -riparian property possessirq no legal property rights to use the lakeshore of Lot 1. Page 1 of 2 City of (. RONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the Ci' of Orono with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on or bk-ore August 24, .1986 together with a certified original copy of this Resolution and execute) niej of th:- covenants or easements noted above. The approval grantee; by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it w'_,1 be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Dated thin 24th day of February, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, Citl Clerk Ti-n Adams, Act4ng Mayor Pace 2 of 2 COUNCIL W-STING Orono Council Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, As: Date: February 14, 1.986 CITY of M40 ant 'Zoning Administrator Subject: 1986 Joint Use Dock Licenses (Applications exhibiting no changes from previous license) The following joint use dock license applications have been reviewed by staff and no changes from the previous licenses are indicated. Staff recommends approval of these 1986 Joint Use Dock Licenses per the resol.,t.ic attached. A brief decripti.on of each application appears below. A) Forest Arms Country Club Addition Homeowners Association Application is for 14 slips as per previous applications. Our approval each year has been for a waximum boat density of 14, with the yearly number of slips approved based on the number of developed interior lots within the plat of Forest Arms Country Club Addition, which was 13 in 1985 and is 13 for 1986. Staff has received no complaints regarding this operation. The proper fees have been paid. lie recommend approval per the resolution attached. List of Exhibits Exhibit Al - 1986 Joint Dock License Application Exhibit A2 - 1986 Proposed License Approval Resolution B) Navarre Cove Homeowners Association This is a renewal application for 6 slips serving the duplexes at 2497 - 2507 Kelly Avenue. There are no changes from previous applications and we have received no complaints about the operati,�,n. The cor- act fees have been submitted. Staff recommends approval per the resolution attached. List of Exhibits Exhibit B1 - 1986 point D(_•c:k License Apnli,_ -i.on Exhibit B2 - 1S86 Proposed License Approval Resolution C) Victor -.a Estates Homeowners Association The applicants request a renewal license for their joint use clock which serves the 6 lots within the plat of Victoria Estates. Resolution 962 limits this join._ use to a maximum of 6 boats regardless; of the stage of development of the plat. Three of the six lots are currently developed. St, has r-ecuived no complaints regardinq this joint use .lock, ana notes no changes frow the previous years application. Staff recommends approval of s.ix slips for the 1986 license per the attached resolution. 1986 JOIN'.i' U�FL DOCK LICENSES February 14, 1986 Page 2 of 2 List of Exhibits Exhibit C1 - 1986 Joint Dock License Applic;dtion Exhibit C2 - 1906 proposed License Approval. Resolution D) Walter's Port Maintenance and Improvement Association The Walter's Pol t docks and slips were approved for 1985 for a total of 5 slips '_ocated at the north wal 1 of the lagoon. This configuration was ruched after long discussion hetween the neighbors and thri C, cy, and appears to have worked wet 1, as we have received nr., complaints and have had no• ncy-aLive comnnents from any of the property owners. Two setback variances were granted in 1984 and 1985 (see Exhibit A of .resolution) and would appropriately be granted again for 1986. List of Exhibits Exhibit D1 - 1986 Joint Dock License Application i,Yhibit D2 - 1986 Proposed License Approval Resolution E) Foxhill Homeowners Association This is a renewal application for 1.3 slips serving the Foxhill subdivision. We ha— received ric complaints regarding this dock facility. The,,:- � are no changes from previous:: applications. The correct fees have been submitted. The City has placed st ip-i l at.ions on the maximum number of slips allowed (16 maximum, huc no more than 1 per existing residence for any given year) and has allowed storage of the dock sections on Outlot 1 near County Road 1.5 during the ater. The dock storage has not caused r-ny problems and would be appropriately approved again for 1986. List of Exhibits Fxhi:ji.t F1 - 1986 Joint. Dock License Application Exhibit E2 - 1986 Proposed License Approval R-E.-solution CITY OF ORONO LICENSE YEAR 19 �4 P.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 473-7357 (association) ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE APPLICATION Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.42 Date Form Sent by City Staff /- 3 K1 Date Application Returned to City Fee Recived S By Employee Section 5.42 Subdivision 2. LICENSE REQUIRED - It is unlawful for any (group or association of persons or famili--s, more than two in number, whether incorporated or not) to engage or participate in... joint use (of any lakeshore property) without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY FEBRUARY 1 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. ASSnrTATION INFORMATIOil 1. Association title or name (if any) Ok ., „WILY C(%-tb j 47tt'Li V..f 2. Lake Bay i t (i.c 'l 3. Person responsible for this application: Phone__ LL: 1 t k. I — Mailing Address_ fit- C 4l ".t 4 V%k j l� Relationship to association P '( t.1)LK. r Page 1 of 5 4. Acsocintior. is (--hcck aw,licnble ite-s): unincorl-rrotcd hume�j,,.-ner's Grou:i. ,,: incorporated Hone-ourner's Association. unincorporated club or recreation group. incorporated lub or recreation group. 5. Princil•a?. purpose of joint use dock is (check anplienble iteme): provide boat mooring and lake access for residential property. L• provide svi.sur:ing access, beach, or offshore dock. 'v' provide n club or esEoeiation gethering plece far activities. 6. Dock is located on (check applicable item): one riember's .)ri mte property. eavement or outl-ot oumed in common. proyerty leesed by t-ie group/associetion. property owned by the group/essocic,.ion. List Dock local{on and ouners:►in information: street eddress legcl prop er':y deser;:)tion I 1 PID # listed property owner(s) 8. Names of abutting lakeshore property owners: (North/West) N1 l,, , �-, (Name + Address) (South/Fast) 61 (Name + Address) Names of ot.hcr affected prcperty owners: -- - 1' I -- (Natnc + nddre ss► (attach sheet if necessary 2 of 5 �: .�� .. fit' ✓V r• �f .' - r�' .. .r '. :1� � i•C... � �`'. .. ... .li•'%li]•'^. 1 � L': it' _ V... C,. . ,I;,;.rce iu!i owned ; o' is y -i ,t• the follovi.n�; in!'o;.rh',Jon: name of insured-+emAk- Tt f,,ut,�, name of' insurance carrier AL-t tjA name of i nsur.,nce rtencv ` V (I policy no. (_�`�-'> t.L �� effective dAte of coverage amount of coverage; Yublie lieti.l`_ty, e'er person, per occurence $ Fubl:c l:nbility, ler occurence $ v tLMc 10 • Securi';y and colic ing o, the jointl, usei dock a: d property is provided by (check er,n)icable items): _ fencin6. .� security lighting. I- property owner's presence. contract securit.- Eerrice. other (specify) DOCK INKPI-ItT10',7 11• List Dock Use Area Stlecificativrs: Widtil of shore'l: ne; -I, 'I -' ft. Le lat'r. of r;.ain dcc:c from shore; l Est' ft. Dock setbacks from side property lines at shore; 2,1, ft. and ft. 12• Dock Cer.,truetion (check applicable items): `4 seasc,nal dock (relocAted or rep-jaced each year). permanent piling With seaccnel deck. permanent pi'_inG and decking. wooden decking. mete! decking. 13. Lis': I)_-.ck Accessories: Number of fire extingu'shers evPi'eble et t:ie dc—k (-• Number cf Life presei-vers avai.lnble r't the dock �t 14• Liat n-wnber of slips in eer_ii crtej,ory ("sli? s" includes boat .lifts): Transient (da. use onl,�) slii s Transient (de;; use) off-siiore buoys Permanent moorage slip n ��l 1ermanent moorr,ge off -shore buoys D:y storage (rack) slips � Knximum nuirber of b:)ats at the dock < if 15. List number of off-st eet ►.ark',;g s;;•Aces nvailnble for users of the joint use dock. 1,Firlcirtr, -f pruv'del mist riot be se;'arAt.ed from the dock by any plic'.ic Med . s,,aces . 3 0f 5 '� NroS10:: ;:'•:� T,IN'�::v•i'.,,1,Y(,,.� ;,c••"^i�c�, 16, Sc,urelane ..s p^GC,ecleu u� (ereck a;_ .,ceb:e ;Leis) _ cne ri p re ` wriod eawal .. Meta]. oerivai 1'. _ concrete seewe] 1 . f,rnss and vcgetatlun crily. other (sj:ec::fy) 17. Depth of water at enoreline is ft; at 50 ft. uut if ; a;, 100 fL. out ;s �I REQUIRED ATTACHMILNTS The following must accompany this application: A. DOCK. PLAIT - ALL APPLICATIONS A dock Llan, drawn to scale, showing the shoreline width of this property, the side propercy lines and the location, layout and dimensions of all docks, slips and buoys. If off-street parking, dry storage or other on -land functions are intended, these also should be shown c:, the plan. B. UNINCORPORATED GROUPS OR ASSOCIATIONS 1. A list of the names and mailing addresses of all members and/or slip users. 2. A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use. Note: This copy is not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock istoh,. operated under the same by-laws or agreement originally made in (state yriar) and o;t file with the City." Applicant's initials C. iNCORPORATE'j ^TUBS OR ASSOCIATIONS 1. A list of the names, mailing addresses and titles of all corporation officers. 2. A statement :5 to the total number of members in the club or a!sociation. 3. A certified copy of the articles of incorporation and by-l.ws of the corporation. Note: These copies are not requirec_ if the applicant initials and certifies the following statement:i"This is a :cnewal application and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same artielf of incorporation and/or by-laws as originally made or last amended in `i� `� (state year) and on file with the City." �r -- Applicant's initials Pa ae 4 u f D. ANNUAL LICENSE FEE - ALL APPLICATIONS Joint Use Dock License Application fee according to the current City Fee Schedule. RENEWAL JOINT USE FEE, per year $ 20.00 PLUS SLIP FEE for each permanent moorage slip, lift, dry stack, or buoy _L�3__slips @ $2.00 each $ 2.C� TOTAL DUF: THIS APPLICATION $ LATE FEE - Renewals Applications for renewal of licenses shall be made no later thart February 1 of the license year. The City shall not accept renewal license applications received after February 1 unless the application is accompanied by a late fF:,e of $25.00. REVIEW PROCEDURE When e complete application is received, the application will be reviewed by the City Council and, in the case of new or unusual applications, also by the Plznning Commission and Marina Committee. The Council will pass upon the .oplication after cr�—)lete review. THE SUBJECT DOCK MAY BE INSTALLED AND/OR OPENED FOR USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Joint Use Dock License Application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the City's employees and agents to enter upon the property at any reasonable: time tc� perform safety and code compliance inspections. 1� i Sigr,ec. Page 5 of 5 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO ISSUE A JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE TO FOREST ARMS COUNTRY CLUB ADDITION HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 1986 TO DECE14BER 31, 1986 WHEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafter "City" is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota and has the authority and responsibility under Minnesota Statute, State Statute 412, et. seq. and State Statute 4E2, et. seq., to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens cf the City and other members of the public within the City; and WHEREAS, the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over the primary harbor limit of the City of Orono with the Lake !Minnetonka Conservation District. and tre Department of Natural Resources of the State of Minnesota; and WHERI?AS, the regulate- of the navagable waters involves an exercise of police power of the State, LMCD, and the City of Orono, all of which have a(jap`.ed rules to ensure to all equal enjoyment of the public rights and eqv-� 1 protection from Acti v.i ty on or near the L l�] :c waters and on the land within the City which, if unregulated, may be detrimental to the pu:.)lic health, safety and general welfare, and WHEREAS, the regulations of the DNR, LMCI;, and t'�e City of Orono regulate the property rights of they riparian owners both as to residential owners and the commercial marina owners to the extent prohibiting any interference with the public waters adjoining their property. The LMCD, DNR and City of Orono must fulfill :heir trusteeship over the public waters by protecting against inter.:.rence by anyone, including those: who assert the commonlaw rights of riparian owners, whether or not they be commercial marinas or residential owners; WHEREAS, as to Lake Minnetonka, a mutual right of enjoyment exists between and is shared by riparian owners and the publ:c generally, no one riparian owner has exclusive privileges over Lake Minnetonka. The only additional private right that any riparian owner may have over the public generally is to construct one dock to the navigable depth of the public waters. Thera can be no dispute but thaL- the public y-nerally and each riparian owner to Lake Minnetonka has the right to use the entire surface area of Lake Minnetonka for all suitable purposes in common with all other riparian owners. This right is a right not only to mr-mbei s of the public but the right to each riparian owner. Page 1 of 2 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NUA. This mut right of enjoyment which is shared by riparian owners and the publ_; generally includes the recreational benefits of the lake such as boating and fishing therein; the riparian owner has no exclusive privileges to these rights; and WHEREAS, Lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial beneficial public use only as long as all riparian users of the lake are regulated in such a way as to ensure there is no abuse -f the limited riparian rights; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted reasonable regulations regarding the construction and use of lakeshore and dock facilities when such facilities are used and maintained by three or more families, which regulations include the annual licensing of Joint Use Docks pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to set forth the above noted general conditions and concerns and the following special conditions as they relate to an application for an annual Joint Use Dock License described on Exhibit A attached, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, t1at the City Council of the City of Orcno hereby directs the Staff to issue a Joint Use Dock License according to the facts and conditions noted in Exhibit A attached. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono at their meeting on the 24th day of February, 1986. F,1"1.4ST t Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Tim Adams, Acting Mayor Page 4 of 4 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF ORONO EXHIBIT A R;F gOLUT1ON NO. CONDITIONS ON' ISSVANCF •oR ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE I. LICENSEE: Forest Arms Country Club Addition Homeowners Association, Inc. Dock 'ddress: 4245 Forest. Lake Drive Agent: fames R. Grabek Address: 960 Forest Arms Lane, Mound, MN 55364 Licensee is: unincorporated homeowner's group XX incorporated homeowner's association unincorporated club or recreation group incorporated club or recreation group other License Period - January 1, 1986 to December 31, 1986 II. BOAT DENSITY The number of in -place boat slips, lifts and buoys sna 1 l not u.:ceed the number shown on the af.tache.d plan, Fxhibit B, and in accordance with Resolution 938, in no case the number of authorized boat slips, lifts, or buoys exceed the ..:r permitted in the prior year's license. Authorized Boat Der6ity per attached plan: Bay T.-ansient (Day use only) Slips Permanent h -)orage Slips Boat Lifts Sub -Total: Slips at Dock Offshore Buoys Maximam goats in Water Maximum Boacs per prior license MAXIMUM BOAT DENSITY Forest Take 14 1, 4 14 SamV 14 Exhibit A Resolution No. Page 2 Exceeding this maximum boat density, or exceeding the number of permitted slips, lifts or buoys is a violation of this license subject to revocation and/or prosecution for violation of Section 5.42 Subdivision 2 of the Orono Municipal Code. III. DOCK LAYOUT Ti,--� dock structure or layout aut;iorized by this license shall be as shown on attached Exhibit B. Any changes in this layout shall be subject , pri— r review and approval of the City Council. IV. SPECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance wi'11-, the ordinance of the City and/or the LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to full compliance with these conditions. rail.ur� to comply with these conditions is cause for license revocation and/or prosecution by the Ci.iy. The Purchase Agreement by and betwe the City of Orono and the Forest Arms Country Club Addition homeowners Association, Inc. will permit a maximum of 14 slips. The City will approve 11 slips for this license year based on the number of develop interior lots within the subject plat. V. Nothing in this license shall confer upon any person for the benefit of any property any vested right to use Lake Minnetonka or the promises in a manner permitted by this resolution, but the use of Lake Minnetonka and +.he premises shall .remain subject to such regulations and ordinances as the City and ogler competent regulatory authorities shall deem necessary from time to time in the public interest. ;L- Lar '2 3 1 tiL or Z4. Q tor Oli no, 40.' 2. 10) CIT' OF ORONO P.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 473-7? 57 (association] ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE APPLICATION Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Se.:tion 5.42 LICENSE•' YE'AIt 19 86 Date Form Sent by City Staff. 3 e�C� Date Application Returned to City C.3 Fee Recived $ > z '- _ By Employee Section 5.42 Subdivision 2.. LICENSE RE U:.ED - It is unlawful for any (group or assuc' =-n -ersons or families, more than two in number, whether incorpo, 3 ! to enaage ox participate in ... joint use (of any lakesho Qp— without first having obtained a license therefor from t.. Lty. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION i'FE TO THE CITY CLERK BY FEBRUARY : OF THE LICENSE YEAR. ASSOCIATION INt'nRMATION 1. Associati:�,• title or nai 2. Lake Minnetonka (if any) Navarre Cove Homeow^ers Associatic _Bay 3. Person responsible ter his application: Carman's Nary. if) ,ryle L. �)hc� —Phone-4 11-9864 or 371-3211 _ Mailing Address .y ..Lly Avenue, Excelsior, MN _55331 Relationship tt, ass(-.•iat.ic--- President Page 1 of 5 14. Assoc ntior. is ;,11f1c. sr,.,licnble _`•c�:s): r unlncorir�ratf�d �roreorrie.r's X incor-noruted Homeo-rer's Associatior:. ` cnincorporsted club or recreption groua:. incorporated club or recreation group. 5. Princil-al. purpose of joint use dock is (check e---licai le items): X provide boat mooring and 'lake access for residential i)roper",,. provide swinuning eceess, beach, cr offsnore dock. provide a club or association fathering plece for ectiv'.tics. 6. Dock is located on (check applicable item): crie nember's nrivate property. easement or outlot owned in common. .i-operty leesed by the group/'associe`ion. X oroperty owned by the group/essocietion. 7. List Doc location and tersaip -nformation: street uddress 2497-2503 Kelly Avenue lege! :nerty description Outlot A, Navarre Cove, Hennepin County rID # 20-117-23-12-0047 fisted ! ronerty c;wncr(s) Nav Cove Homeowners Association 0. Names of abutting lakesisut � pror.C_ ty owners: (North/West) Daniel T. Lindsay, 2.321. _N• ntington ?oint Road E., Wayzata, MN 55391 (Name + Ac....r� s) (South/East) Daryle L. Uphoff, 2699 Kell Avenue, Excelsior, MN 55331 (Name + Address! *ids xaft xaltbisa x�ft$�ls� ooRgx x�taor.;eao�►wc x x x ,an rehl, 41499 Kelly Aoenue, Excelsior, MN _55331 Name + Address) (attach sheet if necessary) Peter Choir, 4920 Colonial Drive, jolden Vallev, MN 55416 2 of 5 9 , :c ...vur ,t: - .. t:. sr_', c­w • ...c c,... . .X_ .:1 er:.,. cwner S se;,arete ovncd ;.ollcv. �ir:t Wic fol.lca i informhtion: name of insured Navarre Cove Homeowners Association name of insurance carrier Aetna Life! and Casualty name of insurance agency Tuthil' Agency policy no. 37 _GS 526198 CCA effective detof coverage smc punt of coverage; Public 11 iti.li t;; , rer person, per occurence $ 500, 000 Pub1Se 1'.ability, ter occurence $ 500,000 10• Security acid policing of the jointly use:: deck and prDperty is Irovided by (check app3lcable item): fencing. security l.i(rtine. x property owner's Presence. contract s(:curit; service. of ,_- (specify) JOCK INRUPWTIC) i 11. List Dock Use Area S-+eci f!cstic,ns: Widtix of nccrel'ne; 80 ft. Lenxtt. of main dc.f!k from shore; 25 x't. Duck setbacks from side pm;,erty lines at shore; 20 ft. and 20 ft. 12• Dick Cnnstructic.n (check applicebie _ —Ronal dock (relocated or rep'Aac^a each year). _ rermenent p.linC, w_th se®scnel heck. x permanent i ling and decking. wooden decking. mtetel deckin 1.3, List Ir-,ck accessories: Nunbt_.r of fire ettineuisherr tveiJe:ie at the dock 0 Number of life ,re:.ervers available at the dock 2 14. List number of slips in etch cPteCory ("sli::s" 'nc'..u3e:; boat lifts): Transient (day use )nly) alias 0 Transient (dey use) off -shore buoys 0 Fermauent moorage slips 6 J,ermanent mooruee off -shore buoys 0 Dry storage (.-eck) sli;.s w0 _ N,aximiun number of beets at the dock 6 15. List number o, cff-stir_et perK.ing_ fpen(•6 available to users of the Joint use ,rock. J-Arkin;, t.f provide3 must rct be set,arAted from the duck by any public ,roed. 0 spaces. 3 of 16. Siiural::ne as _ ctone ril p rap. wuod : eawal. . v,etel seRwu2 I. cuncrece seew!i i l . x grass and vegetation only. other (specify) 17. Depth of water at shorcline is 4 ft; at 50 ft. uut is 16'; at 100 fL. out is 30' REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: A. DOCK PJ.AN - ALL APPLICATIONS A dock plan, drawn to scale, showing the shoreline width of this property, the side property lines and the location, layout and dimensions of all docks, slips and buoys. If off-street parking, dry storage or other on -land functions are intended, these also should be shown un the place. B. UNINCORPORATED GROUPS OR ASSOCIA'I'Iovs 1. A list of the names and mailing addresses of all members and/or slip users. A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use. Note: This copy is not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same by-laws or agreement originally made in 1980 (state year) and on file with the City." p�_- Applicant's initials C. INCORPORATED CLUBS OR ASSOCIATIONS 1. A list of the names, mailing addresses and titles of all corporation officers. See Attahment B. 2. A statement as to the total number of members in the club or associaticn. 4 members. 3. A certified copy of the articles of incorporatio and by-laws of the corporation. Not,: These copies are not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following statement: "This is a renewal application and cur joint use dock is to be operated under the same articles of incorporation and/or by-laws as originally made or last amended .in _ 19,90 (state year' and on file with the City." _ ;TD L%4 i Applicant's initial:: Pane 4 of 5 D. ANNUAL LICENSE, FEE - AT.L APPLICATIONS Joint Use Dock License +pplication fee according to the current City Fee Schedule. RENEWAL JOINT USE 'EE, per year 20.00 PLUS SLIP FEE for each permanent moorage slip, -]-ft, dry stack, or. ►)uoy 6_ slips @ $2 .00 each S 12. �10_ TOTAL DUE THIS AT ICATION $ 32.00 _LATE FEE - Renewa s Applications for renewal c- licenses shall be made no later than February 1 of the license -ear. The City shall not accept renewal license applicaticns rece., ed after ^ebruary 1 unless the application is accompanied by A late�f­ of $25.00. REVIEW PRCCEDURE When a complete application is received, the application will be reviewed by the City Counci. and, in the case of new or unusual applications, also by the P.- nrling Commission and Mar: rn:, Committee. The Council will pas3 upon t - application after comp' to review. THE SUEJLCT DOCK MAY BE INST: -.LED AND/OR OPENED FCR USE: ONLY UPON APPRU•:TAI, OF THE LICENSE BY T : CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.42 of ..v! Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono Citl Council to review this Joint Use Dock License Applicati,-)n, and agrc?s and authorizes the City of Orono and the City's employees and agents to enter upon the property at any reasonable time to perform safety and code compliance inspecticns. c Signed t`-- 1------- --Date, Paqe 5 of 5 i • � ,,pit- i© • � � if'3 - 60 ATTACHMENT B List of names and mailing addresses of all members and/or slip users. Daryle L. Uphoff 2699 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, MN 55331 Daniel T. Lindsay 2321 Huntington Point Road E. Wayzata, MN 55391 Peter Chow 4920 Colonial Drive Golden Valley, MN 55416 Tom Dahl 2499 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, MN 55331 Cite of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO ISSUE A JOINT [1SE DOCK LICENSE TO NAVARRE COVE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION SUBJECT T( CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 1986 TO DECF14BER 31, 1986 WHEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafter "City" is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota and has the authority and responsibility under. Minnesota Statutt. -�, State Statute 412, et. seq. and State Statute 462, et. seq., to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the citi%ens of the City and other members of the public within the City; and WHEREAS, the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over the primary harbor limit of the City of Orono with the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and the Departme, of Natural Resources of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the regulation of the navagable waters involves an exercise of police power of the State, LMCD, and the City of Orono, all of which have adopted rules to ensure to all equal enjoyment of the t '-lic rights and equal.. protection from activity on or near the public waters and on the land within the City which, if unregulated, may be detrimental to the public health, safety and c;eneral welfare; and WHEREAS, the regulations cf the DNR, LMCD, and the City of Orono regulate the property rights of the riparian owners both as to residential owners and the commercial marina owners to the fl!xtent prohibiting anv interference with the public waters adjoining their property. Th LMCD, DNR and City of Groner must fulfill their trusteeship over the public waters by pr)tecti, against interference by anyone, i.,cluding those who assert th„ commo. law rights of riparian owners, whether cr not they be commercial. marinas or residential owners; WHEREAS, as to Lake Minnetonka, a mutual right of enjoyment (--,x.ists between and is sharel by riparian owners and the public general iy, no one riparian owner has Exclusive privileges ov-r Lake Minnetonka. The only additional private right that any riparian owner may have over the public generally is to construe: .)ne dock to th- navigable depth of the public eaters. Thrr.e can ne no dispute but that the public generally and each riparian owner to Lake Minnetonka has the right to us( the entire surfoce area of Lake Minnetonka for all suitable purpo:,es in common with all other riparian ,Dwners. This right is a right not only to members of the publie but the right to each riparian owner. Page 1 of 2 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL pia This mutual :sight of enjoyment wh'.^h is shared by riparian owners and the public generally includes the recreational benefits of the lake such as boat:.ng and fishing therein; the riparian owner has nc exclusive privileges to these r- ghts; and WHEREAS, Lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial 1 oneficial pub' ' c use only as long as all riparian users of the lake are regulated in such a way as to ensure there is no abuse of the limi,ed riparian rights; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted reasonable regulations regarding the construction. and use of lakeshore and dock facilities when such facilities are used and maintained by three or more families, which regulations include the annual licensing of Joint Use Docks pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to set forth the above noted general conditions and concerns and the following special conditions as they relate to an application for an annual Joint Use Dock License described on Exhibit A attached, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby directs the Staff to issue a Joint Use Dock License according to the facts and conditions noted on Exhibit A attached. Adcpted by the City :ou� ail of the City of Orono at their meeting on the 24:h day of F'ebruaxy. 1985. A T T E S) T : Dorothy M. Hallin , City Clerk Tim Adams, Acting Mayor Page 4 of 4 Page 2 of 2 (i ."Y OF ORONO EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF ISSI,''\NCE FOR ANNUAL, JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE 1. LICf:NSEE: Navarre Cove HomeoF.ners Association Dock Addre-ts: 2505 Kelly Avenue Agent: Daryle L. Uphoff Address: 2699 Kelly Avenue, Excelsior, MN 55331 Licensee is: unincorporated homeowner's group XX incorporated homeowner's association unincorpc_-:ted club or recreation group incorporate. club or recreation group cth(.r License Periou - January 1, 1986 to December 31, 1096 II. BOAT DENSITY The number of in -place boat slips, lifts and buoys steal 1 not exceed the number shown on the attached plan, Exhibit B, and in accor'-ance with Resolution 938, in no cam. e :.hall the number of authorized boat slips, lifts, or buoys exceed the ..�:mber permitted in the prior year's license. Authorized Twat Density per attached -Ian: Eay Carman ransient (Day use only) Slips 0 hermanent Mooraci 1'1 ps _ 6 Beat Lifts 0 Sub-TotiAi: Slips at Dock _ L _ Offshore Buoys 0 Maximum Boats in Water Maximum Boats per prior license same MAXIMUM BOAT DENSITY G 'xhibit A Resolution No. Page 2 Exceeding this maximum boat density, or exceeding the number of permitted slips, lifts or buoys is a violation of this license subject to revocation and/cr prosecution for violation or Section 5.42 Subdivision 2 of the Orono Municipal Code. A DOCK LAYOUT The doQk structure or layout au*-horized by tt<is license shal. .e � s shown on attached Exhibit P. Any changes in this layout shall e .subject to prior review and approval of the City Council. ICI_ 3PECIA' ONDITIONS required for compliance with •rye ordinance of thf. C=i ty and .r the LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to ,:ompliance with these conditions. Failure to comply th these ions is cause for license revocation ind/or prosecut rn by the " NONE:" V. Nothing in this licerse shall confer upon any person for the benefit of any property any ested right to use Lake Minne^nka or the premises in a manner permitted by this .resolution, but the use or Lake Minnetonka and the premises shall remain s•ibject to -ich regulations and ordinances as the City and other competent regul _•)ry auchcriti-s shall deem necessary from time to time in the , relic interest. . • Ex H 1611- E3 i G�080 ELI ORG /yaP-C v �/ c / t -t-7�o •t/ � G fo N_;-Olr "Of To CITY OF ORONO - LICENSE. YEAR 19Jn P.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 473-7357 (association) - ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE APPLICATION Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.42 Date F .m Sent by City Staff /- 3 - P,( !- Date Application Returned to City_ G- V Fee Recived $ De-- By Employee " -•.�� Section 5.42 Subdivision 2. LICENSE REQUIRED - It is unlawful for any (group or association of persons or families, more than two in number, whether incorporated or not) to engage or participate in ... joint use (of any lakeshcre property) without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMI.L SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY FEBRUARY 1 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. AS SOC I I.T I ON INFORMATION 1. Association title or name (if any) r 1«U (/% 2. LakeRi�, k E?.�q)h BaY���i,'_rS�—�!�n1 3. Person responsible for this application: Name711O& Phone 9 Mailing Address ��,cE^(� Relationship to association KF,.'L'('r, Page I of 5 4. Associntic-r. it (%nec!: aT-!iIicnble itcrs j: I-unlncorl Gratcd norierivner's j;rou.). Xincorporated Homeowner's Association. unincorporated club or recreation group. _ incorporated club or recreation group. 5. Frincil•al. purpose Of joint use dock is (check applicable items): X- provide boat mooring and lake access for residential property. provide swimming cceess, beach, or offshore dock. _ provide a club or association gethering plece for activities. 6. Dock is located on (check applicable item): one member's private property. easement or outlot owned in common. _ property leesed by the group/essocietion. property owned by the group/essocietioa. 7. List Dock location and ownership, inibreation: street eddrrsa SAKI ^5, �'�,��,,vvt YLwPi` lef,sl property description PID # listed property ou er(s) S. Names of abutting lakeshore property owners: North/West. (Name + Address) South/East) (Name + Address) Names of ct:her affected property owners: (Name + Address) (attach sheet if necessary) 2 of 5 1:: er`; w:ier'r- 'nc,:,:c!cw►jer's , o'..ie; . XV A t C Jam` /nr,rO,.if`i.�C�!t GVnr'l GliCy moist the follows name of insuredyir; `%VTATF-5 tloe(M u(�#jaAt4 kkr.I fU Name of itisursnce carrier �)r')LL IFF I ltiC _ name of insurance ot;er.cy &AUG"W utC.titbi. 4 S AV"I lUG policy no. effective date of coverage aT- 1 amount of coverage; Public liebil..;; , r'!r person, per occurence Pub13c 1-ability, :er occurence Sr66 +000 10• Security s,►d rolicing of the Jointly use- dock and property is provided by (cheek eplA icable items): fencing. security ].i, .tiny. X_ property owner's presence. contr&ct security service. other (specify) DOCK INDLRWITTON 11• List Dock Use Aree Srecs fica`_in . s: 0&me t-S QWV0Du.S Widt.n c,f snorel!.ne; fA:, i't. enztL: of' rf:i!i dock fro;.i shore; 7'?60 ft. Dock setracks from s"He prnperty lines aL shore; 2kc,ti ft. and _2�Q _ ft. 12. DDce. Construction (check applicable :terns): seasonal. doe':,, ( relocated or rePleced a%cn year) . _ rerranent i sling with sesscnel leek,. �L permanent piling and decking. wooden decking. metal deckin6. 13. Litt Dcck Accestories: Number of fire eictinLuis"ier!; s•vrilWe at the doer; 0 Number of life Preservers availr,'Ae at the dock C_ 14. List number of sll,,s In each ceteL-o.,y ("sllre" inclules boat lifts): Transient (day use only) slips Transient (day use) cFff-shore buoys Permanent moorage sli;,s . l ermonent nuorrige off -shore buoys Dry r,trrage (rack) slips _ Kiximum nun;Af r of 'boats at the dick l.In. number of off-street i-nrki►:K Fvftcer. available for users of the joint use dock. Parking, !.f provided must not be separnt•ed from the dock by any public road. Q a;uaces . 3 of S EK)S10:: AND 16. Snur;!lJJne : s pzro;eetc:,i u.r (_-r.eck at pllcr:u;e _ str)ne r;p relr. _ wood-,enwal . _ !",C0 . Se"t'Wall. concrete seewall. grass and vegetation only. other (si:ec;iy) _ 17. Depth of water at snoreline is G' ft; at 50 ft. out is L� ; at 1.c0 f i.. out is �. REQUIRED ATTACHMENT'S The following must accompany this application: A. DOCK PLAN - ALL APPLICATIONS A dock plan, drawn to scale, showing the shoreline width of this property, the side property lines and the location, layout and dimensions of all docks, slips and buoys. If off-street parking, dry storage ar ether on -land functions are intended, these also should be shown on the plan. B. UNINCORPOPATED GROUPS OR ASSOCIATIONS 1. A list of the names, and mailing addresses of all members and/or slip users. 2. A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use. Note. This copy is not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same by-laws or agreement originally made in (state year) and on file with t1 City." Applicant's initials C. INCORPORATED CLUBS OR ASSOCIATIONS I. A lint of the names, mailing add :asses and titles of all corporation officers. 2. A statement as to the total numb r of members in the club or association. 6 members. 3. A certified copy of the article:, of incorporation and by-laws of the corporation. Note: These copies are not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same article of incorporation and/or by-laws as originally made or last amended in NF" (state year) and on file wi.0. the Cit Applicant's initials Pace 4 of 5 D. ANNUAL LICENSE FEE - ALL APPLICATIONS Joint Use Dock License Application fee according to the current City Fee Schedule. RENEWAL JOINT USE FEE, per year $ 20.00_ PLUS SLIP FEE for each permanent moorage slip, lift, dry stack, or buoy __slips @ $2.00 each $ TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $�3 1, LATE FEE - Renewals Applications for renewal of licenses shall be made no later than February 1 of the license year. The City shall not accept renewal license applications received after February 1 unless the application is accompanied by a late fee of $25.00. REVIEW PROCEDURE When a complete application is received, the application will be reviewed by the City Council and, in the case of new or un-isual applications, also by the Planning Commission and Marina Committee. The Council. will pass upon the application after complete review. THE SUBJECT DOCK MAY BF 1NSTALL'ED AND/OR OPENED FOR USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY TIE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby req>iests the Orono City Council to review this Joint Use Dock License Application, and agreQs and authorizes the City of Orono and the City's employees and age -its to enter upon the property at any reasonably, time to perforrr safety and code compliance inspections. Payc 5 of 5 Outlot C r o� EXISTING CHANNEL 3 A 22' Sedan s 180'r 24' Cruiser 14' Sunt ish 4' CATWALK OVER �� 4' BOAT DOCK x 180' LONG. WETLANDS TO SHORE. 11Z o V APR 13 19 9 Outlot B BOAT _DOCK LOCATION NO SCALE Plat of Victoria Estates LI"(-0. C� %t b M.#,7*Az K.d, SL,r-> Nvamk lkao% VIZ 6R000 f-lA SS u(I "+ 4XA ANo QR7GA IIMU 00 Y %o 4)0--,T A P� R+-1 OR prZ000 fK.� s 5 U y -TC*O 'Y p2 %a ch\ 1-I4 t 1 p (` VA O*,; E C. 1 lc; 1-S r, q1 t PC cul Li 4b v c O(Z, aP.0or) r-k S Tie (1 u C ""./ a(4 d-, v W. .r) CA �" D=14L c S�Mc� ClIty of ORONO REST' )TION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO ISSUE A JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE TO VICTORIA ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 1986 TO DECEMBER 31, 1986 WHEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafter "City" is a municiFal corporation organiz`d and existing under the taws of the State cf Minnesota and has the authority and responsibility under Minnesota Statutes, State Statute. 412, et. seq. and State Statute 462, et. seq.., to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City and other members of the public within the City; and WHEREAS, the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over the primary harbor limit of the City of Orono with the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and the Department of Natural Resources of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the regulation of the navagable waters involves an exercise of police power of the State, LMCD, and the City of Orono - all of which have adopted rules to ensure to all equal enjoyment of the public rights and equal protection from activity on or near the public waters and on thr land within the City which, if nregulated, may be detrimental f- the puhli.c ht�al_h, safety and general welfare; and WHEREAS, the regulations of the DNR, LMCD, and the City of Orono requlate the property ri,ihts of the riparian owners both as to residential owners and the commercial marina owners to the extent prohibiting any interference with the public waters adjoininy their property. The LMCD, DNR and City of Orono must fulfill their trusteeship over the public waters by protecting against interference by anyone, including those who assert the commonlaw rights of riparian owners, whether or not they be commercial marinas or residential owners; WHEREAS, as to Lake Minnetonka, a mutual right of enjoyment exists b^tween and is shared by riparian owners and the Dublic generally, no one riparian owner has excInsive privileges over Lake Minnetonka. The only additional private right that any riparian owner may have over the public generally is to construct one dock to the navigable depth of the public waters. There can be no dispute but that the public generally and each riparian owner to Lake Minnetonka has the right to use:: the entire surface area of Lake Minnetonka for all suitable purposes in common with all other riparian owners. This right is a right not only to members of the public but the right to each riparian owner. Fagg 1 of 2 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. This mutual riclht of enjoyment which is shared by riparian owners and the public generally includes the recreational benefits of the lake such as boating and fishing therein; the riparian owner has no exclusive privileges to these rights; and WHEREAS, Lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial beneficial public use orly as long as all riparian users of the lake are regulated in such a way as to ensure there is no abuse of the limited riparian rights; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted reasonable regulations regarding the construction and use of Lakeshore and dock facilities when such -facilities are used and maintained by three or more f;-Lilies, which regulations include the annual licensing of Joint Use Docks pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to set forth the '-e noted general conditions and concerns and the following special c,..,ditions as they relate to an application for an annual Joint Use Dock License des..^.ribed on Exhibit A attached, NOW, THEREFORR, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono herebf directs the Staff to issue a Joint Use Dock License accordirg to the facts and conditions noted on Exhibit A attached. Adopted by the Citv Council of the City of Orono at their meeting on the 24th lay of I el)ruary, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Tim Adams, Actinq Mayor Page 4 of 4 ^aq-r 2 of 2 CITY OF ORONO EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF ISSUANCE FOR ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE I. LICENSEE: Victoria Estates Homeowners Association Dock Address: 540 North Arm Drive Agent: Thcmas D. Mozer Address: 560 North Arm Drive, Mound, MN 55364 Licensee is: unincorporated homeowner's group XX , incorporated homeowner's association unincorporated club or recreation group incorporated club or recreation group other License Period - January 1, 1986 to December 31, 1986 II. BOAT DE14SITY The number of i s-p 1 ace boat slips, lifts and buoys shall not exceed the number shown on the attached plan., Exhibit B, and in accordance with Resolution 938, in no case shall the number of authorized boat slips, lifts, or buoys exceed the number permitted in the prior year's license. Authorized Bo:-t. Density per attachod plan: Bay _North Arm Transient (Day use only) Slips 0 Permanent. Moorage Slips 6 Boat L:ft� 0 Sub -Total: Slips at Dock Offshore E_,ioys 0 _ Maximum Boats in Water 6 ====e Maximum Boats per prior license 6 MAXIMUM BOAT DENSITY 6 r==a= Exhibit A Resolution No. Page 2 Exceeding thiE, ,,,aximum boat density, or exceeding the number of permitted slips, lifts or buoys is a violation of tnie license subject to revocation and/or prosecution for violatic, of Section 5.42 Subdivision, : of the Orono Muni(-i.l)al Code. III. DOCK LAYOUT The dock structure or layout authorized by this license shall be as shown on att.acherl Fxhit•i` B. Any changes in this layout shall. be subject to prior review and approval of the City Council. IV. SPECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinance of the City and/or the LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to full compliance with these conditions. Failure to comply with these conditions is cause for license revocation and/or prosecution by the City. 1. Six slips are approved for Victoria Estates Homeowners Association for 1985 subject to the stipulations set forth in Pesolution #952 ated December 18, 1978. 2. All goats permanently moored at this Joint Use Dock must be registered to the applicant property owners. V. Nothing in this license shall confer upon any person for the benefit of any F.operty any vested right to Use Lake Minnetonka or the premises in a manner permitted by this resolu,_ion, but the use of Lake Minnetonka and the premises shall remain subject to such regulations and ordinances as the City and other competent regulatory authorities shall deem necessary from time to time in the public interest. ri t-cwlr�a 11Z oobc�p� o � APi 13 1979 ^ r.0. m Outlot C r c� EXISTING CHANNEL 180' 22' Sedan 24' Cruiser 14' Sunfish e r_e-. rl 4' CATWALK OVER WETLANDS TO SHORE. 10-107111 4' BOAT DOCK x 180' LONG . Outlot B DOCK LOCATION NO SCALE Plat of Victoria Estates N o X z All CITY OF ORONO P.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL PAY, Mil 5532.3 473-7357 association) _CITY ANNUAL JOI,�T USE DOCK LICENSE APPLICATION Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.42 Date Form Sent by City Staff /_ _.� - iSC' LICENSE YEAR 19 Date Application Returned to City Fee Recived $� _ By Employee' j Section 5.42 Subdivision 2. LICENS_E REQUIRED - It is unlawful for any (group or association of persons or families, more than two in number, whether incorporated or not) to engage or participate in...joint use (of any lakeshore property) without first having obtained a license thexefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS ANC SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE. APPI,ICATiON FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY FEBRUARY 1 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. ASSOCIATION INFORMATION 1. Association title or name (if any) A�-�C -y �a4i '`�s�:`t'<�lA04" r u 2. Lake %4 A? k; r,,T (N —Bay 3. Person responsible for this application: Name_ V. Pam.: tjM —Phone_'*7 1 Mailing Address JL1k�; `r�• �� ^- �-N Fx c ��_�;�.,a_h!�'_ ___�, Relationship to associationr_IsLs-A Page 1 of 5 �. Acso/ctntiar. is (%neck at.;�lienble items j: V unircorpora tcd horeov-r;er's Grou_,. incorporated Homeowner's Association.. unincorporated club or recreation. Group. incorporated club or recreation grout). 5. Princira l purpose of joint use dock is (check applicable items): (provide boat mooring and lake access for residential property. _ provide swimming access, beach, or offshore dock. provide a club or association gathering glace for activities. 6. Dock is located on (check applicable item): one member's private property. ,Xeusement or outlot owned in common. _ property leased by the group/associetion. Property owned by the group/essociation. 7. List Dock location and ownership information: street cddress legal property descriPtiou PID # listed property owners) _ B. Names of abutting lakeshore property owners: (North/West) (Name + Address) (South/East) (Name + Address) Names of other affected property owners: (Name + Address) (attach sheet if necessary) 2 of 5 .. �1 �r:..�-'..... :L' ..Vtt:, f�, - m..n 1..f.:1•- :+f... t '�}-... �C �li'ili?��J� :.•I C'.'iC i._ L..l' _1�1:-. 7 �.:v}:ertc.w:,A�•'r .:c,::•rcJ,�c�•'c .•a:.;.c� sel:'rarste owned ' ist the folicw , nc; in''ormi.,,ion: name of insured :lame of rtsui-ance carrier name c'.' insurance o ency policy no. effective det.e of coverage e'n:,unt of eovern6e; ; ublie liatilj , r'�r pers;;n, ier occurence $ F'ubl.'e 1'.-ibility, ter occurence v 10 • Securi ..y and uolicing of the Jointly used dock and property is ; rovided by (crleck P::1;1 is-ble items) : fencing. security Lighting. r property ovaer's presence. _ contract s-curit; service. other (specify) 11. List Dock Ure Area Sj eci f'i ca- i,_,ns : Nidtn of cn^_el_ne; `-J ft. iengti-: of rain dock from whore; ft. Dock settacl s fr-m side ,property lines at shore: 12. Dock Construction (check aj:pl.icable items): Q ft. and ft. _ seasonal dock (relocated or re:)Iacei eech/year). m _ peranent pilinD with seesc.nel deck. 1/ perraner:t rilirG find decking. wooden decking. _ metal dec,cin,­,. 13. List I ek Accessories: Number of fire extinguishers sw ileble at the dock U Nwiber of lire preservers availaable et the dock O 14. List number of slips in eech ceteCory ("slips" includes boat .lift-): Transient (da;,' use only) slips Transient(day use) off -shore buoys Iermenent moorage slips f-ermenent moorf,ge off -shore buoys Dry storage (reek) sl ipr, Maximum number of boats st the dock S IS. List numl..er of off' -street parkire F;.'aceF available for users of the joint u::e dock. 1Nrking, {f provided must not be separnted from the lock by any public road. . 0 spaces. 3 of 5 16. .; ov.; ii.le : s proveeLed b, (pLE^E: Cit i�.l :CPU:E 'tert:r,): }� _Y ' -tone r1Jp ray. � wood ^ewwml .. _. meLtil senvali. c(Jnl :' seewall. eross and Vegetation only. other (specify) 17. Depth of water at snoreline is .S ft; at 50 ft. "t is S ; a;, 1CO f t:. out is S - REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: A. DOCK PLAN - ALL APPLICATIONS A dock plan, drawn to scale, showing the shoreline width of this: property, the side property lines and the location, layout and dimensions of all docks, slips and buoys. If off-street parking, dry storage or other on -land functions are intended, these also should be shown on the plan. B. UNINCORPORATED 3ROUPS OR ASSOCIATIONS 1. A list of the names and mailing addre,:-es of all members and/or slip sers. 2. A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use. Note: This copy is not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following statement "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same by-laws or agreement originally made in (state year) and on file with the City." Applicant's initials C. INCORPORATED CLUBS OR ASSOCIATIONS 1. A list of the names, mailing addresses and titles of all corporation officers. 2. A statement as to the total numLer of members in thy, club or association. members. 3. A certified copy of the articles of incorporation, r.nd by-laws of the corporation. Note: These copies are not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same articles of incorporation and/or by-laws as originally made or last amended in ;5 (state year) and on file with the city." Applicant's initials Pane 4 of 5 D. ANNUAL LICENSE FEE - ALL APPLICATIONS Joint Use Dock License Application fee according to the current City Fee Schedule. RENEWAL JOINT USE FEE, per year PLUS SLIP FEE for each permanent moorage slip lift, dry stack, or buoy � slips @ $2.00 each TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION LATE FEE - Renewals $ 20.00 Applications for renewal of licenses shall be made no later thart February 1 of the license year. The City shall not accept renewal license applications received after February 1 unless the application is accompanied by a late fee of $25.00. REVIEW PROCEDURE When a complete application is received, the application will be reviewed by the City Council and, in the case of new or unusual applications, also by the Planning Commission and Marina Committee. The Council will pass upon the application after complete review. THE SUBJECT JOCK MAY BE INSTALLED AND/OR OPENED FOR USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Joint Use Dock License Application, and agrees and authorizes thn City of Orono and the City's employees and agents to enter upon the property at any reasonable time to perform safety and code compliance inspections. Signed _- Date Paqe 5 of 5 City (if ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. RESOLUTIO0 DIRECTING STAFF TO ISSUE A JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE TO WALTER'S PORT MAINTENANCE & IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN FOR THP PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 1986 TO DECEMBER 31, 1986 WHEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafter "City" is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota and r-s the authority and responsibility under Minncsota Statutes, Statt: Statute 412, et. seq. and State Statute 462, et. seq.; to protect the health, safely, and general welfare of the citizens of the City and other members of th.. public within the City; and WHEREAS, the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over th, primary harbor limit of the City of Orono with the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and the ^apartment of Natural Resources of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the regulation of the navagable waters involves an exercise of police power of the State, LMCD, and the City of Grono, all of wh 4. ch have adopted rules to ensure to all equal enjoyment of the p,iblic rights and equal protection from activity on or near the publ waters and on the land within the City which, if unregulated, may be detrimental to the public Health, safety and general welfare; and WHEREAS, the regular ions of the DNR, LMCD, and the City of Orono regulate the property rights of the riparian owners both as to residential owners and the commercial marina owners to the extent prohibiting any interference with the public waters a-3joining their property. The LMCD, DNR and City of Orono must fulfill their trusteeship over tl;o public waters by protecting against inter Ferencc- by anyone, includin(: those who assert the commonlaw rights of riparian owrcrs, whether or not they be commercial marinas or residential owners; WHEREAS, as to Lake Minnetonka, a mutual right of enjoyment exists between and is shared by riparian owners and the public c,enera 1 1 y, no on,? ri )arian owner has exclusive privileges over Lake Minnetonka. The only additional private righ+- that anv riparian owner may have over the public generally is to construct one dock to the navigable depth of the public waters. There can be no dispute but that the public generally and each riparian owner to Lake Minnetonka has the right to use the entire surface area of Lake Minne onka for all suitable purposes in common with all other riparian owners. This right is a right not only to members of the public but the right to each riparian. owner. Page 1 of 2 City, of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. This mutual right of enjoyment which is shared by riparian owners and the public generally includes the recreational benefits of the lake such as boating and fishing therein; the riparian owner has no exclusive privileges tj these rights; and WHEREAS, Lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial beneficial public use only as long as all riparian users of the lake are regulated in such a way as to ensure there is no abuse of the limited riparian rights; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted reasonable regulations regarding the construction and use of lakeshore and dock facilities when such facilities are used and maintained by three or more families, which regulations include the annual. licensing of Joint Use Docks pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to set forth the above noted general conditions and concerns and the following special conditions as they relate to an application for an annual Joint Use Dock License described on Exhibit A attached, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby directs the Staff to issue a Joint Use Dock License according to the facts and conditions noted cn Exhibit A attached. Adopl-ed by the City Council of the City of Orono at their meeting on t1ty. 2,th day of February, 1.986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hal lin, City Clerk Tim Adams, Acting Mayor Page 4 of 4 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF ORONO EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS 01 ISSIJANCE FOR ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE I. LICENSEE: Walt is Port Maintenance & Improvement Association Dock Address: 2699/2701 Kelly Avenue Agent: Michael G. Pluhm Address: 2710 Pence Lane, Excelsior, MN 55331 Licensee is: XX unincorporated homeowner's group incorporated homeowner's association unincorporated c:,ub or recreation group incorporated club or recreation group other License Period - January 1, 1986 to December 31, 1986 II. BOAT DENSITY The ember of in-p1 ace boat s 1 ips, 1 i f t s and buoys sha I 1 not exceed the number shown on the attached plan, Exhibit B, and in accordance with Resolution 938, in no case shall the number of authorized boat slips, lifts, or buoys exceed the number permitted in the prior year's license. Authorized Boat Density per attached plan: Bay Transient (Day use only) Slips Permanent Moorage Slips Boat Lifts Sub -Total: Slips at Dock Offshore Buoys Maximum Boats in Water Maximum Boats per prior license MAXIMUM BOAT DENSITY Carman U 5 0 G 0 5 5 5 sws� Exhibit A Resolution Nc) . Page 2 Exceeding this maximum boat density, or exceeding the number of permitted slips, lifts or buoys is a violation of this license subject to revocation and/or prosecution for violation of Section 5.42 Subdivision 2 of the Orono Municipal Code. III. DOCK LAYOUT The dock structure or layout authorized by this license shall be as shown on attached Exhibit B. Any changes in this layout shall be 'act to prior review and approval of the City Council. IV. PECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinance of the .ty and/or the LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to full compliance with these conditions. Failure to comply with these conditions is cause for license revocation and/or prosecution by the City. 1. Variances granted for 1986: a) West property line (extension of west line of Lot 2, Block 2, Walter's Port) - 10' required, zero setback proposed b) Southeast property line (extension of southeast line of Out lot 2, Walter's I'crt ) - 10' required, zero setback proposed 2. The five slips are approved for properties located in the plat of Walter'. Slip 1 - Lot 2, Block 2 Slip 2 - Lot 2, Block 2. Slip 3 - Lot 1, Block 2 Slip 4 - Lot 1, Block 1 Slip 5 - Lot 5, Black 3 (part of Lot use by the following s Port : Carman Bay Heights) 3. City must be notified immediately of any change in use or configuration of the dock. 4. All boats permanently moored at this joint use dock must be registered to the applicant property owners. 5. Lot 5, Block 3 (part of Lot 1, Carman Bay Heights) is a 1 lowed four boats maximum (1 at lagoon, 3 at outer Lakeshore). V. Nothing in this license shall confer upon any p•:rson for the benefit of any property any vested right to use Lake Minnetonka or the premises in a manner permitted by this resolution, but the use of bake Minnetonka and the premises shall remain subject to such regulations and ordinances as the City and other competent regulatory authorities shall deem necessary from time to time in the public, interest. Sc.4 M: i t"1 R R. S,,)A A kz A 0ur�.oT R-ESOLUTION.# K y OUT -_... for ;L LA MR HALTER'S PORT (North): ' ' --777 _• _ subject to Order of 4-25-84 0 u r%-4 A ICT "E-04 OQTLor R%P &.Jul wr u %& SLAP t 1.AT �. t3t i• W �i'1,t c AU o �� fFq- S"b !rr• S'p ' l90& - 5b PAkT of C%,C .AU wo CITY OF ORONO P.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAI, BAY, MN 55323 4-'-7357 FEB 18 1986 G 1 1 LICENSE YEAR 19 (a i.ation) ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE APPLICATION Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.42 Date Form Sent by City Staff - i-�?L Date Application Returned to City_2-r%�3- dwtn Fee Rec ivied $.7/`� By Employee ' Section 5.42 Subdivision 2. LICENSE REQUIRED -• It is unlawful for any (group or association of persons or families, more than two in number, whether incorporated or not) to engage or participate in ... joint use (of any lakeshore property) without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY FEBRUARY 1 OF THE LICi:NSE YEAR. ASSOCIATION INFORMATION 1. Association title or name (if any) fC)(Alf ( 3. Person responsible for this application: i Name C: [ ,C' 1 �' i_'.,' Phone'l Mailing Address /I� /1c A' i,r► Relationship t ociation!_ � F"/{ Page 1 of 5 4. Association. it (_mock ar-;)licnblc it.crr.$): unircorl Grotcd hr—ovner's grou.i. is inco rporeted Homeowner's Association. _ unincorporated club or recreation group. incorporated club or recreation group. 5. Princirai purpose of joint use dock is (check applicable items): provide boat mooring and lake access for residential rropert;. _ Provide suimming access, beach, or offshore dock. _ provide a club or association gethering plece far ectivi.'_cs. f Dock is located on (check applicable item): one member's private property . (� easement or outlot owned in common. pror_erty leered by the grou;�/associetion. — rroperty owned by the group/essocietion. List Dock location and ovnersaip information: street cddress legal .property description PID # listed property oumer(s) S. Names of abutt lakeahore property owners: (North;West) �COc-. (Name + Address) (South/East) Name + Address) Names of other affected property owners: (Name +Address) (attach sheet if necessary) 2 of 5 cvngq ''F no:::(!ww-per'£ ?'U:.iC '• /� r•eE nitate ;^ri, ,; /nrroc,- Lion owned _.rilic•y. list, Lhe fol.lowInG inforr..;,tion: name of insured f�'/i'•CL �+�,�r���.v'i1.1�. �ii� %•c'nJ name of insurance carrier W� TF �ti �� x ��f�'�''�` ` "r name of insurance oLency policy no. G,: /�f'.-3 r -3 effective date of coverage . * Y amount of coverse,.,, Fublie liabill%f, per person, per occurenee $r00�00U C5 Public 1fability, cer occurence 10. Security and policing of the jointly used dock and pr3ucrty is provided by (check el)O iceble items): fencing. 1, security l.i(;i:ting. _ property owner's pre -once. contract securit, re'',ice.. DOCK IDWPM ,.TION 11. List Dock Use Area Specif:catiuna: W:idt.'n of shoreline; ft.1,en.Itr. of rGea:i doc:c fro::; shore; �ft. Dock settacks from side I)r-;zertj lines at. shore; 2, ft. and < < ft. 12• Dock Construction (check applicable items): seasonal dock (re:ocsted or replaced each year). _ permanent IilinC with sesscnel deck. � permanent pi'_.inG and decking. wooden decking. metal decking. 13. Lib t TM,ck AccesForles : Number of fire extinguishers !:vr:ile':'"' e et the dock �'� 1%t "e. ` �I .'i T" Number of life preservers availnble Nt the dock c`-t, f' 14• List number of slips in eech crteCory ("sluts" includes beat Lifts): Transient (day use only) slips Ierinanent tinnorage slips Dry storaCe ( rack) slips Transient (day use) off -shore buoys . 1 i ermranent raoorrge off -shore buoys Mhximum number of boats at the dock_. 15. I.ict numi.ter of off-street parktr:g spaces avalia?ale for users of the joint use deck. harking, ' f' provided inust not 1.>e re,.nrn*'ed from the dock ,�y any public road. a0 - spacer. 3 u t' 5 Li:() �,lc.i AND S T.Itr- WA'PTUI' CC 'TW11. 16. 6iioreline -.s pro;.ected i,y 'check a:•_o:i.icrbic ii.e!c,_): ctone rip rely. wood seawal.. mei,HI seHwali. concrete seHvell. _ gress and vegetation only. other (specify) 17. Depth of eater at shoreline is / 1� ft; at 50 ft. aut is at 100 f t. out is 'l S REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS The fallowing must accompany this application: A. DOCK PLAN - ALL APPLICATIONS A dock plan, drawn to scale, showing the shoreline width of tl_is property, the side property lines and the location, layout and dimensions o' all dOCKS, slips and buoys. If off-street parking, dry storage or other on -land functions are intended, these also should be shown on the plan. B. UNINCORPORATED GROUPS OF ;SOCIATIONS I. A list of the names and mailing addresses of all members and/or slip users. 2. A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use. Mote: This copy is not required if the applicant initials and certifies ti'e following statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use doc is to be operated under the same by-laws or agreement originally made in (stae year) and on file with the City." c'KtAIC Gr7 tpv,vr.'L iP*0-3 �`1 Applicant's initials Ju-,r /2/ /977 INCORPORATED CLUBS OR ASSOCIATIONS A 1. A list of the na-:es, mailing addresses and titles of all corporation officers. A -statement as tc the total number of members in the club or association. ` m-mber s . 3. A certified copy of the articles of incorporation and by-laws of the corporation. Note: 'These copies are nct reguirec_ if the a:.plicant initials and certifies the following statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same articles of incorporation and/or by-laws as originally made or last amended in /`% /��(state year) and on file with the City " { >r Applicant's initials Page 4 of 5 D. ANNUA'_, LICENSE FEE - ALL APPLICATIONS Joint Use Dock License Application fee according to the current City Fee Schedule. RENEWAL JOINT USE FEE, per year $ 20.00 .PLUS SLIP FEE for each permanent moorage slip, lift, dry stack, o:: buoy slips @ $ 2 .00 each $ 'TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $ LATE FEE - Renewals f Applications for renewal of licenses shall be made no later than F-�bruary 1 of the license year. The City shall not accept renewal license applications received after February 1 unless the application is accompanied by a late fee of $25.00. REVIEW PROCEDORE When a complete application is received, the application will be reviewed by the City Council and, in the case of new or unusual applications, also by the P1.-nning Commission and Marina Committee. The Council will pass upon the application after complete review. THE SUBJECT DOCK MAY BE INSTALLED AND/OR OPENED FOR USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Joint Use Dock License Application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the Cit.y's employees and aar,nts to enter upon the property at any reasonable time to performsafetyand code compliance inspections. Signed Datr Paqe 5 of 5 FOXHIJ:L HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION PRESIDENT Paul Tietz VICE PRESIDENT/TREASURER Owes► A. Parr SECRETARY Linda Gustafson February 17th, 1986 ("it y of ORO NO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO, RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO ISSUE A JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE TO FOXHILL HOME:)WNERS ASSOCIATION SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 1986 TO DECEMBER 31, 1986 WHEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafter "City" is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota and has the authority and responsibility under Minnesota Statutes, State Statute 412, et. seq. and State Statute 462, et. seq., to protect th;: health, safety, and general welfare Cf the citizens of the City and other members of the public within the City; and WHEREAS, the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over the primary harbor limit of the City of Orono with the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and the Department of Natural Resources of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the regulation of the navagable waters involves an exercise of police power of the L;ta te, LMCD, and the City of Orono, all of which have adopted rules to ensure to all equal enjoyment of the public rights and equal protection f.~om activity on or near the public waters and on the land within the City which, if unregulated, may be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare; and WHEREAS, the regulations of the DNR, LMCD, and the City of Orono regulate the property rights of the riparian owners both as to residential owners and the commercial marina owners to the extent prohibiting any interference with the public waters adjoining their property. The LMCD, DNR and City of Orono must fulfill their trusteeship over the public waters by protecting against interfe,Pnce by anyone, including those who assert the commonlaw rights of riparian owners, w;-•ther or not they be commercial marinas or residential owners; WHEREAS, as to Lake Minnetonka, a mutual right of enjoyment exists between and is shared by riparian owners and the public generally, no one riparian owner has exclusive privileges over Lake Minnetonka. The only additional private right that any riparian owner may have over the public generally is to construct one dock to the navigable depth of the public waters. There can be no dispute but that the public generally and each riparian owner to Lake Minnetonka has the right to use the entire surface area of Lake Minnetonka for all suitable purposez in common with all other riparian owners. This right is a right not only to members of the public but the right to each riparian owner. Page l of 2 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY 'COUNCIL NO. This mutual right of enjoyment which is shared by riparian owner and the public generally includes the recreational benefits of the lake such as boatit,:, and fishing therein; the riparian owner has no exclusive privileges to these rights; and WHEREAS, Lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial beneficial public use only as long as all. riparian users of the lake are regulated in such a way as to ensure there is no abuse of the limited riparian rights; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted reasonable regulations regarding the construction and use of lakeshore and dock facilities when such facilities are used and maintained by three or more families, which regulations include the annual licensing of Joint TIse Docks pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to set forth the above noted general conditions and concerns and the following special conditions as they relate to an application for an annual Joint Use Dock License described on Exhibit A attached, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby directs the Staff to issue a Joint Use Pock License according to the facts and conditions noted on Exhibit A attached. Adopted by the City Counci 1 of the City of Orono at their meeting on the 24th day of February, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Tim Adams, Acting Mayor Page ? of 2 CITY OF ORONO EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF ISSUANCE FOR ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE 1. LICENSEE: Foy:iill :Io-neowners P,ssociation Dock Address: 1801 Shoreline Drive Agent: Owen A. Parr Address: 1190 Heritage Lane, Wayzata, MN 55391 Licensee is: unincorporated homeowner's group XX incorporated homeowner's association unincorporated club or recreation group _ inc..-porated club or recreation group other License Period - January 1, 1.986 to December 31, 1986 AI. BOAT DENSITY The number of in -place boat slips, lifts and buoys shall not exceed the number shown on the attached plan, F .hibit B, and in accordance with Resolution 938, in no case shall tl,:! number of authorized boat slips, lifts, or buoys exceed the number permitted in the prior year's license. Authorized Boa* DenriLy per attached plan: Bay Smith's Transient (Day use only) Slips 0 Permanent Moorage Slips 13 Boat Lifts 0 _ Sub -Total: Slips at Derck 13 Offshore Buoys 0 _ Maximum Boats in Water 13 Maximum Boats per prior license 13 MAXIMUM BOAT DENSITY 13 s�=sue Exhibit A Resolution No. Page 2 Exceeding this maximum boat density, or exceeding t=he number of permitted slips, lifts or buoys is a violation of this license subject to revocation and/or prosecution for violation of Section 5.42 Subdivision 2 of the Orono Municipal Code. III. DOCK LAYOUT The dock structure or ?.ayout authorized by this license shall be as shown on attached Exhibit B. Any changes in this layout shall be subject L'o prior review and approval of the City Council. IV. SPECIAL, CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinance of the City and/or the LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to full compliance with these conditions. Failure to comply with these conditions is cause for license revocation and/or prosecution by the City. 1. The maximum number of slips or moorings to be licensed in the future shall not exceed 16 provided that for any given year, the license shall bc: issued for no more titan. 1 boat per residence in the Foxhi l l Subdivision according to the findings set forth in the Resolution 1042 adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on the 12th day of June, 1979. 2. Winter storage of dock parts and sections shall be permitted on Out lot M1 between the time the dock is removed from the lake in the fall and June 1st of the following year. V. Nothing in this license shall confer upon any person for the benefit of any property any vested right to use Lake Minnetonka or the premises in a manner permitted by this resolution, but the use of Lake Minnetonka and the premises shall remain subject to such regulations and ordinances as the City and other competent regulatory authorities shall deem necessary from time to time in the public interest. •• —' /d•2vIP • c..o.UNrr R 13.9�l t•BJ S) �. 10.62.7.9 A•.?7�.07 N33.02' S8'E ' •-."' L•82.8F �• •-- .!J 90< - `• t!e '2O.C'82.86 NO. ' I5 ^ 1 ' • ✓ 10 J. l M. Nor ..: s 1 t 7' p C. 1 PERMANf.'YT 71 dbck�iq..�t Oos•- l:9 hr " So, FgO.N �. ....-Zz•• - --'tea - _ ...r•_y,, •. - ••�£ - 3i0 .�� 1 3.E2 PAES P•.rs txr or OUTLOT I EAsFM -tS- rgAC Jr ! v1 O LAKE M.INNETONKAIN CA ;rf SM/Tf f'S • bAY roc I — to .. pl' 04 Hrc c A t SOC. or o t I r. /. r•/ �� ' C l 2 3 4 5 6 7$ 9 /0 •� —�- f 16600 rpom wfsr Ems' / •: Of PROPOSED o �► la0M Wr . '••� EA$rf*#V TRAtr . ' EAsrZAN fOGE Of Jai nst o """- 1 �earyir t �Pt n.c�^•�r too, ._ i WUHN MitVING To: Orono Counci 1 .(.,mbers CITY OF NOW From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Admi.nstrator Date: February 14, 1986 Subject: 1986 Joint Use Dock License - Rhode,/P-1 w/Lindahl, 3155 North Shore Drive List of Exhibits rxhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Fxhibi.t C - Excerpts From Resolution #1212 This is a request for a Joint Use Dock License to serve ..I._. properties located at 3155 North Shore Drive, 3185 North Shore Drive, and 1406 Bohn's Point Road. ! would first refer you to Resolution #1212 (excerpts attached as Exhibit C), which allows a single dock to be constructed by the owners of the subject. properties, with a maximum of 3 boats total allowed to ke docked. moored, ur stored. The appl_' ation comes to us in 1986 because in prior years, only two of the three property owners made use of the dock, not requiring a joint use dock license. This year, all three owners will be using the dock. The proposed Onck structure appears to meet all location requirements, bel* less than 100' in length, and exceeding the m; nimum 15' side s,.t.back requirements of the LMCD. An LMCD mu'ti le dock license is not required for join' uses of 4 or less partiu. , , ecause this is a new application, the Council, at their discrcl.ion, may call a public hearing, but a hearing is not reo,.t,ce' Staff wouldd recommend approval subject to the findings and !onr1 v.ions set forth in the attached resolution. CITY OF' ORONO F.O. I3OX 66 CRYSTAL DAY, MN 55323 473-7357 (association ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICv"SE APPLICATION Pursuant to Orono Munic- Code Section 5.42 LICENSE YEAR 19 P L' Date Form Sent by City Staff ; - Date Application Returned to City_�`3-- � -� // ti. Fee Recived $ l"By Employee'✓` J Section 5.42 Subdivision 2. LICENSE REQUIRED - It is unlawful for any (group or association of persons or families, more than two in number, whether incorporated or not) to engage or participate in ... joint use (of any lakeshore property) wi_hout first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE. COMPLL ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, A..i LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY FEBRUARY 1 OF 711E LICENSE YEAR. ASSOCIATION INFOPMATION 1. Association title ox name (if any)_ 2. L,kc. 3. 'erson responsible for this application: Name tT.gC rr �f�©vim --Phone= inq Address�3/,5�'7'7�1.G•' �.t'/� CC✓�'?%,i..r./ Relatic.,nship to association •►'�'7.'U�'�`.� _ —._ ____ Page 1 of 5 4. Associntior. is (r^eck ar.;,iicnble it.e^ s) : unircori c•ratcd horier)-vuer's grou.i. .- Hort c,%mer's Association. _ unincorporated club or recreation group. _ incorporated club or recreation pro+ip. 5. Princiral purpose of Joint use dock is (check applicable items): _.!1 provide bcat mooring and 1 ke access for resid atial property. _ provide sMimmiag eccess, beach, or offshore dock. provide a club or association gethering 1)ieq:e , activities. 6. Dock is located on (check applicable item): one member'e private property. easemen+. <,r outl.ot owned in common. _ property leesed by the grou)/association. property owned by the group/e.ssociation. 7. List Dock location and ownership information: street eddress 3r.�S�/16/�7•�/o.PE !r%.!/GE' G�.�9y�tigl�r �/1�•�53`1� legal rooerty descri .,tion P I D # 09— // 7— 23 33 OOo/ listed rronerty oi:.er(s) 8. Names of abutting lakeshore propert; owners: o r t / We s t) -70-,qA) /� (Name + Address) Sou E a s t ) _�S/C C_ #, CCoeE' Z4zY6-`;{ (Name + Address) Names of other affected property owners: E�S�ri✓T h�riCY'.S z (Name + Address) (attach sheet i necessary) 2 of 5 ono t �' l cwner's ho;,;ccwne,•'- «e4iey.,OO( iCS epnrste .on owned ;o'icy. list Lhe followinL,; information: name of insured IS</� / 7- name of insurance carrier name of insurance agency policy no. ef,'ect.ve date of coverage amount of coverage; i=ublic lietilit; , rer nerson, per occurence $ Public 1fabil.ity, car occurence $ 10 • Security and policing Of the jointly used dock and property is VrDvided by (check applicable items): fencing. _ security lighting. Z property o,,rner's presence. contract security se*vire. other (specify; DOCK IrIFOP,h MON 11• List Dock Use Area Specif'catiuns: Width of shoreline; /3�,) i'L. Length of main dock from shore; - q� '.'t- Dock setbacks from side property lines at shore; ,$Qf4jjWft. and AW 20t ft. NwrL' SiDE' SGU7;4 SiOLC__ 12• Dock Construction (check applicable items): IAA i oar-- dZ�r ; Al s�f�rE �cr�c.�T�onl Aseasonal dock (relocated or replaced each Xeur ) permanent i,ilinC, w_th seasonal deck. F manent piling and deckinu. Xwooden decking. � metal decking. 13. List Dock Accessories: Number of fire extinguisher!; svt:ileb;e at the dock Number of life preservers available pt the lock /O 4- 19• List number of sli;.z in eech cete;ory ("sli.r:s" includes boat lifts): Transient (day use only) slips Transient(dey use) off -shore buoys Permanent moorage si.ips Permanent moorage off-r,hore buoys Dry storage (rack) clips Maximum number of boats at the dock 15. List number of off-stree(, parking, spnces available for users of the joint use dock. Perking, 'f provide) mast not be separnted from the dock by any 1)ublic road. © spaces. 3 uV 5 Ei0S10:' AND C(-"i-�,i 16. Siwi-al no . s ozy tee te-i Ly (ct.ecF: a� • iicaua.e i �e :. j stone rip rap. � wood seawui .- rret112. ser1.:H11. concrete seewe'il. _x grass and vegetation only. other (specify) 17. Depth of Water eL shoreline is _0 ft; at 50 ft- out is ; a;: 100 ft. out is REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application:: A. DOCK PLAN - ALL APPLICATIONS A dock plan, drawn to scale, showing the shoreline width of this property, the side property lines and the location_, layout and dimensions of all docks, slits and buoys. If off-ftreet parking, dry storage or other on -land functions are intended, these also should be shown on the plan. B. UNINCORPORATED GROUPS OR ASSOCIATIONS �7�/6l �I 'O 0 A list of the names and mailing addresses of all members and/or slip user 2. A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use_ Note: This copy is not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following statement: "This is a renewal E.-piication and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same by-laws or agreement originally made in (state year) and on file with the City." Applicant's initials; C. INCORPORATE,D CLUBS OR ASSOCIATIONS A,//4 1. A list of the names, marling addresses and titles of all corporation officers. 2. A statement as to the total number of members in ti.e club or association. members 3. A certified the articles of incorporation and by-law!: of the corporation. Note: These copies- are not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same articles of incorporation and/or by-laws as originally made or last amended in (state year) and cn file with the City." Applicant's initials Pace 4 of 5 D. ANNUAL LICENSE FEE - ALL APPLICATIONS Joint Usc ock License Application fee according to the current City Fee o,:hedule. RENEWAL JOINT USE FEE, per near $ _20.00 PLUS SLIP FEE for each permanent moorage slip, Lift, dry stack, or buoy _slips @ $2.00 each $ TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $ ak — LATE FEE, - Renewals Applications for renewal of licenses shah' be made no later that February 1 of the license year. The City shall not accept renewal license applications received after February 1 unless the application is accompanied by a late fee of $25.00. REVIEW PROCEDURE When a complete application is received, the application will be reviewed by the City Council and, in the rase of n.�w or unusual applications, also by the Planning Commission and Marina Committee. The Council will pass upon the application after complete review. THE SUBJECT DOCK MAY BE INSTALLED AND/OR OPENED FOR USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE: LICENSE BY THL CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Joint Use Dock License Application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the City's employees and agents to enter upon the property at any reasonable time to perform safety and code compliancy inspections. S i.gne d l__.. +�� Date_�/ Page 5 of 5 EX,41/A�'/T- 1- Insured: Jack F. Rhode Carrier: �iAiCT�a�CD Agency: /�i� c! E zs�'� z�vSu �°•9slr' Y Policy #: 9/ .ee Effective date: Public liability -- per person:per occurrence occurrence: Insured: Burton John Lindahl, Jr. Sarah Brooks Lindahl Carrier: State Farm Agency: Al Moulton/545-8675 Policy #: 234091981F Effective date: 7/1/85 Public liability -- per person: $300,000 liability per occurrence: $120,000 property damage Insured: Thomas C. Enlow Susan 5. Enlow Carrier: unubb Agency: The Tuthill Agency Policy #: 5197-84-74 Effective date: 5/16/813 Public liability -- per person: per occurrence: Personal liability per occurrence: $1,000,000 Property: $300,000 Medical payments per parson: $2,000 Names and mailinc�addresses_of slip users Burton John Lindahl., Jr. and Sarah Brooks Lindahl 1406 Bohns Point Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Thomas C. Enlow and Susan S. Enlow 3185 North Shore Drive Wayzata, Minnesota 55.391 Jack F. Rhode 3155 North Shore Drive Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 &-Yflfte/T C . 18353ROS - HWY. 44 �i Not v 560410/01 14" 'City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. I/ 1� /I? _ AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 851 aND GRANTING JACK RHODE VARIANCES TO ALLOt4 CONSTRUCTION ON THE LOT KNOWN AS 1410 BOHNS POINT ROAD LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THAT PART OF GOV' T LOT 1 LYING E OF 14 442.93 FT. THE/tEOF AND N OF S 1058.3 FT. THEREOF & S OF RLL 269 WHEREAS, Jack Rhode applied in 1976 for variances to allow for the construction of a single family residential horse on his lot commonly known as 1410 Bohns Point Road, and has now reapplied for the same variances and for amendment to Resolution N!,6. 851; and WHEREAS, Jason Becker and ilillian Lauer, neighbors who have property adjacent to that lot, have appeared and expressed concerns related to the possible construction sites on that lot; and WHEREAS, the applicant, the neighbors, City staff, the Planning Commission and City Council. have raised at different times numerous facts and legal quest ar3 concerning the application for variances; and .:HEREAS, the Planninq Commission, City Council and City S. =f studied the first appl:cation at Length, including the testimony n memoranda previously submitted by ',Ir. Rhode and his attorneys, ,Ames T. S•.y,2nson, Esq., ant Lorens Q. Frynestad, Esq., and the material submitted by Mr. Jason Bec}cer and his attorney, Jerry Rice, Esq. ; and F:HEREAS, the Planning Commission, City Council and City Staff have studied the 1980 reapplication at length, and have studied all additional testi-;oriy, includin4 that of t;.c2 Crogg S. Hannahs and Darrell K. Stewart and all a-lcitional written material submitted by Rhode, Becker and Lauer; and t:HEP.LAS, the City Cour.c.L: 17as reviewed these applications and all testir•or:y at: City Council Meetings n?1,3 August 8, 1977, August 22, 197 October 11, 1977, June 30. '19^00, July 28, 1.980, August- 25, 1380, September 15, 1180 and the date of this'' ­solution; and U11E1:.EAS, (an :ieptf;:.11.:t'r 15, 1980, Gregg Hannah at>near(-.,d before tt Council and entered into the record a copy of .a 1974 survey showing the walkway easements across tho subject lot (at.taciied hereto as Exhibit E end related details of his-invrilvement with, the sub)�.,cc. lot .and the easernent:, 1')cated thereon, including tt.ctt :-e and his attorney y:•1�1 CaIIt 1%' Ind th.2 '7 r,:�yar.... •' )� f . 7 _t1_ 1 _ a. Chan4in) th•_ --asAmec►tS in 1974, that the City :and !!..i ita,. - .:_, ob;•,c-tions to the eas-rients, that_ the City anti I.�I(7U i; no` a.: :..d :-)r any erdorsoment, r•)rmal revi -w, or appro•;al proc��,;:_; tc,r cis., �:;.r^,,;;f.;. alld r`14atliny his lack r,f with tho Counf•i 1' ., 'r i• t in,] of on=lin.il Res:tllit ion ). 8731 in 1977; _cr i r/ PAGE /OF 1-3_ City of ORONO RESOI ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A, Z f , WHEREAS, the City Council is charged with the responsibility of enforcing the Orono Zoning Code in order to promote the intents and purpo thereof including the preservation of the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Oronc; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon all the testimony and memoranda submitted by the applicants, his agents, the neighbors adjacent thereto and their agents, and by City staff, the City Council grants 6-ne variances as noted hereinafter for the following reasons: I. F11ILI:3 S OF FACT 1. That Jack Rhode's lot. commonly known as 1410 Bohns Point Road, is a lot of record Existing upon January 1, 1975, un,ier jingle t.--rate ownership in an LR-113 use district. 2. A cabin existed on tji,is lot until 1974 or 1975 and that all remains of the callin were not removed until after Rhode acquired the lot in 1976. The cabin had been locate, in the northeast corner of the lot, wit}14.a 30 feet of the shoreline. 1. The tot does not meet the minimum requirements of the Zoning Code as to area and width for a single family dwelling in an LR-1:3 use district. a) The lot is 29.660 squad_ feet in area, based upon the survey of Gary L. Gabriel, dated April 15, 1990 b) The lot is 107 feet in width at the rear. and 13') in width along the shoreline. c) The area -ind wir:)th are not within 80% of the minimum re<Iuire:nents and therefore Council approval of a vari1nnce is nec.c:ed be=ore a single family dwcllinq can be con-;tructed th(---reon. 4. The lot is isolatFrd From other undeveloped 1-and. It is - -rounded on all sidt.5 t)y lakol -..hove or by lots Cum _ning existin,; singlo family llin'35. a) Thy, lot is therefore uni -p.le and the gpner.:►1 con6itions of the lot aro peculiar to such property. b) There is no ad jac - nt ' j,- ": t lani which c oulci be added t0 LI1C'rt_':75�'. ♦}l.. of this lest. PAGE .? OF 1-3 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5. The to -s presently served 'y the public sanitary sewer system, and has been z -essed fo; such service, including assessment of one unit charge. 6. The proposed location of the single family dwelling meets all the stipulated setback requirements of the Zoning Code including: a) 75 ft. minimum setback from the lake ore b) 35 ft. minimiun front yard c) 30 ft. minimum rear yard d) 10 ft. minimum side yards 7, An existing carriage house, located 24 feet from the rear lot line, is proposed to be removed prior to construction of the new house. E here are presently in the chai:z of title easements enefiting Da— roll K. Stewart and the Gregg S. Hannahs hich provide frr a walkway over the lot to the lake. he easement; ran ever one of the side yards as it ated n Exhibit a) The easements excluuj any driving pr_viieges. b) The s ie yard affected by the easements will remain covered by grass Qr foilage and a small corner of driveway is shown on Fxhibit A. c) Thera will be no buildinc_ .)r other, obstruction iii the east ment area. 1. mhe 10 ft. 4idth and location cif the easements is identical -o the 1.0 ft. wide minimum side yard setback area. 2. The ace:.:.. t.0 the proposed dwelling iii .e of fire wi : 1. r(—Rain tho Same as if no casement existed. 3. The l if;ht and air. n i thin the side yard will remain the .arnFz as if no easem(.,nt existed. 4. Thfopennf-s:> .)r "o,.;on �i��3cf:�" of the side y.ir_i will remain ! tic ,f� 17, 1 f no `!,Isf�r."'nt •'xists'd. City Of ORONO RESOLUTION OF TH` " C0L;- NO. b) Rhode's current application calls for complete removal of the carriage house consistent with the conditions of Resole, No. 851. 17. There i pr..,sent.ly i-,i existence one seasonal dock used J . i.ntly ::y th- two easemcnt nolders referred to in paraaraphr 9 above 18. Prior to p''cnasing the lot, Mr. Rhode discussed the "buildabiiity" of the same with Hank Muhich, then Zor,.ing Idministrator fcr the City. 10. Mr. Rhod told that this lot had in the past peen dettri _ned tc be "!)uildabie" '-y prior Council action, namely a lot area anL dth variance approved for Fred Rom s in " 1974 based upon i St, to-i) 19,1 -rvey ied as Exhibit B. 20. foc_- tt13' Ar. Rhode's "lut of recor.-;' exists is- ated froi other undeveloped lend Crakes it ,; I 3nd different _'rom the conditions which apply t 'and in the area. a) 'like. su ?.erd width and a are peculiar to the 1c; :o not apply t, :..orally to ocher land it. area Thn t c-.,c-iot be combined with undeveloped land. _scary that Mr. rhode be granted a variance size and width to preserve h ' . enjoyme " of int�al property ri-glit, to wit: t::e righi- "'we J.:Ang on an LR-1B lot f( r l 22. Wv-rout the varicances as to lot size and width, Mr. Rhode would s_if. rer tli+: particuiar hard ,hip of not being ably to use h)3 r.!sidential lct for residential purposes. 23. i esidenrial ui .e of the ithf-)cie lot is a "permitted" use in '-he LR-1B district, evon thou,1h ` :(- lot_ is substandard in rote width ,acrordi.. t to c iirrer+t zonin; standards. PA" * -Z City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CI T Y COUNCIL 29. The Ordinances, Com. rehensive Plans and practical situac;.on which ex. .'-Eel as of November 14, 1977, when Resolution No. 851 w:as paszad, has not chF nged with respect to the reasons underlying the derision to grarit a lot width and lot area variance or to use line D to D, as depicted on hrhibit A, as t'-,e lakeshore setbacl line for -he ihode property. 30. ThaL the part of line D to D to C repri `ed by "D `^ C" on Exhibit A tc Resolution No. does ..ot - vide any greater protection for the Becker's sic ht i_ine -[ the lake than "n to D" e -.tended all the wav across the Rhode pro t. 31. Line D to D, extended all t` ac - the Rh<_,ae property, protect, the Bec:ker's sight -.Lne or view of the lake. (See Finding No. 11 herein.) The iho.e fi.rdings of fact arr. in part Eased upon and dependent upon the following findings of fact: a. That the :jingle iarrily residential home is to be bt.11t in a location noted on Exhi.tit A attached hereto a id that j Dior to any construr'l-i-n that a surve­ 5e c•.:.iduct-�d to ens re `hat the hou• located as ioteu on Fcnibit A and tha, _ne City Zoning a-,d Planning T '-rinistrat.;r is informed �f the corunen.cement of construction at least 24 hour: prig thr rPto. That thcr.e be only ( iu do^k allowed on ,hp Rhode let which dock shall b, no greater than fF;et in length ,. n t which dock i.., in--nded to sere• r Rhod- .and his suc7essors in title .and the curr itament h-)lders Hannah ::And Stewart an-:1 their r -ctive.. succ(!c_;oLs in cltly, ir•:d which do,.e. -n,jst be (.__:ri;;ructed in ar.cn.r wi tY. 11.1-APr)lic A)1v City and LMCD otdin�ncos. PAGE _ ? OF _ / f City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. c� Cam__—._ C. That an the Rhode lot either attached to the dock, moored in front of the lot or located on the lot, there may not be at any time more than three watercraft, :,.s defined by Regulation 3.01, Subd. 13 of LMCD Regulations, either docked, moored or stored. D. That a short foam of this Resolution may hereafter be filed In the chain of title for the lot noting that the City Council hereby finds as follows: L- That a dock is an accessory use to residential property and must be attached directly to the riparian residential lot it is designed to serve. 2. That any joint use of a dock o. rhis property presently and/or in the future may be only pursuant to an annual joint use 'ock license as set forth in Chapter 74 of t -3 Orono .•,unicipal Code. E. That Mr. Rhode must execute, prior to the effective date of this variance, anO. in a form approved '.. the City Attorney, a docu ent t.o be filed in his , n of title, which restricts Lhe use of the property t ne .cock of not more than 100 feet in length, with not +ore *han three watercraft moored at the dock in front of the or on the property at any time, and that all installIL:.vn or use said dock shall only be pursuant to the terms and nditi.ons of an annual joint use dock license and -'-.her applicabl City ordinances regulating the location, construction and use of docks and mocring areas. R. de and the easement holders shall apply for said livens annually on forms rrovided by tho City and ?n accordence w:.th all appl ` ration r.e(l-tirements and license fees required of simi.13r joint use dock licenses. PAGE /0 0F /3 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. F. The three watercraft a_lowed pursuant to this Resolution may be owned only by Rhode, or his successors in title to the subect property 'Legally descr-Lbed in the title of this resolution, or the two present` easement holders, Gregg Hannah and Darrell Stewart, or trleir successors in title to property legally !3escribed as Tract I, ULS 269 and combined Tracts G 6 H, R.TS 269 respectively. II. GR,,NTI:7G THE VARIANCES Based upon the above findings of fact. and contingent upon specifically those items as noted in Paragraphs A through H, the City Council of the City of Orono grants the following variances: /�. A variance to Section 34.452 as to lot size and width with respect to the lot ecru:^only known as 1410 uohns Point Road. 44 2. A variance to Section 3.1.202 as to maxim-,lm permitted hardcover to the extent of 3% such that no more than 3,520 s.f. of hardcover consistin-1 of house, driveway, sidecaalk, deck, patio or any other impermeable surface may be erected or maintained on this :ot, and that all such hardcover shall be located beyond 75 ft. from the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka. `ow 3. A,1 int-rpretation that line D-D as designated on Exhibit A constitutes the:: vera, lakeshorn setback line of Section 34.201 which line prutocts the lakeshore views from the Hecker house. (A) That the Rhode hou;;n and all appurtor.ances thereto be constructed entirely behind line D-D, being no clo,,cr tc? `.': <' lakes!„ -)re than line D-D, except as fC,liow;. 1. An -pon, ! t ;cry i, unroofed, urienclosed ba 1 ::)ri; s :, :.shown -n A, not to exceed or 17 s'!. : t. In ar�t:a, i, PAGE // Of /J City of ORONO RESOLD OF T►4E CITY CO O. �01 1. P 'un was adopted by the City C ncil fl� the 'ty ►o y, a vote of � yes and _� nays on th_ day of 1980. William Van Nest, M: vor ATTEST: `4Ja1te R. ens n CitvAdministrator I gave read the terms of the above Resolution and 4gree to be bound by them. (Jack Rhode and any other party with property interest.) pack, --�o2 i de STATE OF MINNESOTA ss COUNTY CIF' HENNEPIN On this day of ;'� !' , 1984, 'beforeIvA, a notary .pubic within and for said coun',.y, �rsonal ly appeared to me known to be persons described n i', and �-Fo—e-xecuted_ the—Yc.re,4oinq instru.nent, and acknowledged that they executed the sale as their free act and doed. it � 1t ry AN 'M ""a"" 0 An Irj 'PA9000M • *qWW MMIGM 3X01AQAA •$ AW" PAGE _/-3 OF _AA_ " i1�-ot►o�✓srrC eit�Kw•t � � oW&Y 4 y 1 GHA' Ac S 7v ^141-4 4A.,, Of A City Of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO ISSUE A JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE TO THE OWNERS OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3155 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, 3185 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, AND 1406 BOHN'S POINT ROAD SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 1986 TO DECE14BER 31, 1.986 WHEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafter "City" is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota and has the- authority and responsibility under Minnesota Statutes, State Statute 412, et. seq. and State Statute 462, et. seq., to protect the health, safety, and g nera 1 welfare of the citizens of the City and other members of the public within the City; and WHEREAS, the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over the primar- harbor limit of the City of Orono with the Lake Minnetonka Conser-�ation District and the Department of Natural Resources of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, tre regulation of the navagahle waters involves ar. exercise of police po,:-r of the State, LMCD, and the City of Orono, a 11 of which have adopted ru 1 es to ensure to a 1 1 equa 1 enjoyment of the public rights and equa 1 protection f rom activity on or near the public waters and on the land within the City which, if unregulated, may be detrimental to the purl is health, safety and general welfare; and WHEREAS, the regulatiuns of the DNR, LMCD, and the City of Orono regulate the property rights of the riparian owners both as t) residential owners and the commercial marina owners to the extent prohibiting any interference with the public waters adjoining their property. The LMCD; DNR and City of Drono must fulfill. their trusteeship over the public waters by protecting against interference by anyone, including those who r.ssert the commorrlaw rights of riparian owners, whether or not they t,c commercial marinas or residential owners; WHEREAS, as to Lake Minnetonka, a mutual right of enjohre_nt exists between and is shared by riparian owners and the public generr,l l.y, no one riparian owner has exclusive privileges over. Lake Minnetonka. The only additional prl%ate right that any riparian owner may have over the public generally is to construct one dock to the navigable depth of the public waters. There can be no dispute but that the public generally and each riparian owner to Lake Minnetonka has the right to use the entire surface area of Lake Minnetonka for all suitable purposes in common with all other riparian owners. This right is a right not only to mrrmbers of the public but. the right to each riparian owner. Page 1. of 2 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. This mutual right of enjoyment which is shared by riparian owners and the public generally includes the recreational benefits of the lake such as boating and fishing therein; `he riparian owner has no exclusive privileges to these rights; and WHEREAS, lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial beneficia. public use only as long as all riparian users of the lake are regular-ed in such a way as to ensure there is no abuse of the limited riparian rights; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted reasonable regulations regarding the construction and use of lakeshore and dock facilities when such facilities are used and maintained by three or more families, which regulations include the annual licensing of Joint Use Docks pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to set fortn the above noted general conditions and concerns and the following special conditions as they relate to an application for an annual Joint Use Dock License described on Exhibit A attached, NOW, THEREFORE, r— IT ^ESOLVED, that the City Courci 1 of the City of Orono hereby dire the Staff to issue a Joi^t Use Dock License according to the ta<.ts and conditions noted on Exhibi A attached. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono at their n-eeting on the 24th day of February, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. IIallin, City Clerk Tim Adams, Actinq Mayor Page 2 of 2 CITY OF ORONO 8X!I1B1T A "SOLUTJ'JN NO. CONDITIONS OF ISSUANCE FOR ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE I. LICENSEE: Property owners of 3155 North Shore Drive, 3185 North Shore Drive and 1406 Bohn's Point Road Dock Addr(ss: 3155 North Shore Drive Agent: Jack F. Rhode Address: 3155 North Shore Drive, Wayzata, MN 55391 Licensee is: XX unincorporated homeowner's group _ incorporated homeowner's association unincorporated club or recreation group incorporated club or recreation grob other License Period - January 1, 1986 to December 31, 1986 II. BOAT DENSITY The number of in -place boat slips, lifts an buoys shall not exceed the number shown on the attached plan, Exhibit 3, and in accordance with Fesolution 938, in no case shall the number of author -.zed b-at slips, lifts, or buoys exceed the number permitted in the prior year's license. Authorized Boat Density per attached plan: Bay _ Crystal Transient (Lay use oily) Slips 0 Permanent Moorage Slips 3 Boat Lifts 0 Sub -Total: Slips at Do* __3 Offshore Buoys 0 _ Maximum Boats in Water 3 Maximum Boats per prior license N/; MAXIMUM BOAT DENSITY 3 Exhibit A Resolution No. Page 2 Exceeding this maximum boat density, or exceeding the number of permitted slips, lifts or buoys is a violation of this license subject to revocation and/or prosecution for viola*ior. of Section 5.42 Subdivision 2 of the Orono Municipal Code. III. DOCK LAYOUT The dock structure c,: layout authorize9 by this license ,hall be as shown on attached Exhibit B. Any changes in this layout shall be subject to prior review and approval o� the City Council. IV. SPECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinance of the City and/or the LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to full compli-nce with these conditions. Failure to comply with these conditions is cause for license revocation and/or prosecution by tee City. This license is qranted subject to the findings and conditions set forth in Resolution #1212 of the City Council, summarized as follows: a) The three properties to which this Joint Use Doc:c License is granted aic described as follows: i. (P.I.D. #09-117-23 33 0001 ) "That part of Gov't Lot 1 lying East of the West 442.93 feet ther- -if and North of the South 1058.3 feet thereof and South of Registerec Land Survey No. 269" (3155 North S,.ore Drive) ii. (P.I.D. #09-117-23 33 0015) "Tract I and the West 28.5 feet of Tract H, Registered Land Survey No. 269" (1406 Bohn`s Point Road) iii. (P.I.D. #09-117-2.. -;s 001.6) "Tract G and that part of Tract H lying Fast. of the West 28.5 feet thereof, Registered Land Survey No. 269" (3185 North Shore Drive) b ) There s'- a 1 1 be only one dock allowed on the Rhode: lot (P.I.D. 09-11.7-2 3 nCO1) which dock shal l be no greater than 100 feat in length, and which dock must be constructed in accordance with al l applicable City and LMCD o.-dinances, and which dock is intended to serve only the owners and thei successors of the 3 properties described in a) above. c) On the Rhode lot (P.I.D. 09-117-23 33 0001 ) either attached to the dock, moored in front of the lot or located on the lot, there may not be at any time more than three watercraft, as defined by the LMCD, either docked, moored, or stored. Exhirit A Resolution No. Page 3 d) The three watercraft allowed may be owned only by the owners of he properties decribed in a) above. V. Nothing in this license shall confer upon any person for the benefit of any property any vested right to use Lake Minnetonka or the premises in a manner permitted by this resolution, but the use of Lake M:nnetorKa and thF, premises shall remain subject to such regulations and ordinances as the City and of it competent regulatory authorities shall deerr ce,'- _ry from time to -ime in the public int.. st. Xff-is/ r-' 8 Sc A c_. F' : l ' � -- ? G j98(o - s,.,ps f�� -e �,CJt�l�Ck rat-EfING FEB 24 10BG To: Orono Council Members'TY OF,( From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Adminstrator Date: February 20, 1986 Subject: 1986 Joint Use Dock License - Big Island Veterans Camp List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - LMCD License Application Exhibit C - Draft Resolution The Big Island Veterans Camp Board of Governors haz, requested a Joint Use Dock I.,icense for 1986. As you are aware, any use of the camp in 1�186 is subject to a Conditional Use Permit which has yet to be rep wed. The applicant is requesting a dock use area exhibiting no changes from previous licenses, (last licensed in 1984) with 3 docks of 12', 30', and 12' in length respectively, totaling 14 slips. Two mooring buoys have been approved in the past, but are nct requested for 1986. Note that -i the application form (Page 3, Item 14) the applicant lists 6 "transient" slips and 8 "boats at th(_• Jock," which suggests 8 permanent, i.e. overnight slips. Because a Conditional Ilse Permit for overnight camping is not in effect, and because the City does not consider any existing buildings on the property as habitable, it does not seem appropriate to grant a license for permanent moorage slips at this time. Note that all previous licenses have granted only transient (day use) slips. It would seem appropriate to grant the ,_ tested 14 slips on a transient basis, with further review if permanent slips are requested at a later date. A draft Joint Use Dock License Resolution is attached for your review. CITY OF ORONO LICENSE YEAR 19 _a,- 11.0. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 473-7357 IG A(association)— ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE APPLICATION P77 TmFr t Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.42 Date Form Sent by City Staff Date Application Returned to City_ / - Fee Recived $ `��h By Emplo) e- -Sc. rc, -/BYs 3 Section 5.42 Subdivision 2. LICENSE_REQUTRED - It is unlawful for any (group or association of persons or families, more than two in number, whether incorporated or not) to engage or participate in ... joint use (of any lakeshore property) without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE AL?, "'.MS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LIB', APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY F'EBRUARY 1 OF THE LICL- SE YEAR. ASSOCIATION INFORMATION _ f t� &V- d c-J T CC" J e yov Olr} 1. Association title or name (if any)_:; 2. Lake �' It .1__— Bay i -- --- Person responsible for this application: Name., �'_ _Phone_ Mailinq Address Relationship to association Page 1 of 5 4. Ar.soclatior. iF ( ^heck ar..-I lesb'.e i t.eT s) : unincor; crctcd honeouner's Crou.-- incorporuted Homeowner's Association. unincorporated club or recreation gro,.I . ZC incorj�orsted club or recreation Group. 5. Princiral purpose of joint use deck is (check a plicable items): provide boat mooring and lake access for residential ,)ropert;,. Frovide swi-uning recess, beach, r offsnore dock. * prov:^e a club or association gethering plece for ecti.vit es. 6. Dock is located on (check applicable item): one nember's private nrorerty. easement or outl.ot o%med in corrmon. property Leased by the group/ essocietion. property owned by the group/essociation. 7. List Dock locatJon and ownership infor-atior.: street eddress � 1 legal ;,rorerty description SeQ vy S. PID # 11sted property oumer(s ) Names of abutting lakeshore property owners: (North/West) 17,� (Name + Address) (South/East) A�Q A, e (Name + Address) Names of other affected property owners: (Name + Address) (attach sheet if necessary 2 of 5 ic, 10 A ,:er-•,,•,,' r , A"n ovnery , of ic- ..i�•t. name of insured o r- C :tame of insurance carrier J J QA-,d ►`� ,h.,� �� , !- �' �� Y c, �? name of insurance r rencY 0 .tom, 4_L, 4S Se) e policy no. o L effective drt.e of euverage arncttnt of coverage; l'ublie 7-ia}il`_t; , 1 ,r rperson, per occurence S (p �� 060 Pub l,c 1'.nbilit er occurence (000, 000 Security and rolicinp, of the jointly used dock and is r-rovided b� (check e.+nliceble items): fencing. k, security 1_i;;ctinL,. property owner's ,,resence. _ contract securit., service. otiv_-r DOCK Ir'"r'GPMJT?ON 1 1 • List Dock Use Area Speci fientiuns: Widtn of shore _:lei �j_ i_�Q f;.. Length of na'n do,_ -'A f.�,l'; shorF•; �, _ ft. Dock setbacks f:-,ai side proterty lines a shore; )OGG, ft. 3i1+3 /<:iG(D ¢ ft. 12. Docr Construction (check app; icable iterls): — seesonal dock (re ocated or repl.ace� each yerr•). rerr.enent pi:linC with seascnal deck. A r,er:rr.nent pilinL and dezking. _ Wooden decking. m,etel dec;:in�;. 13. List Dock Accescories: Ilurnber of fire extinguishers; ^vei leb ke at thre doer: Number of life i+reservers ava±irible r't the deck 14 • List number of slil,s in pr:r,l crtet;ory ("s] .ir-s" incJ udee beat l i fts ) Transient (day use only) s).ii's _• Transient (de;,• use) off -shore bu(,vs Yermanent moorage sl.. ps -_�! ? c•rmanent m. urc•ee off -shore buoys Dry -,t,)raee ( rack) slips C Mnr.iinwn number of boats at the deck 15. List number of off-street l,rrr+:inE speces avaiinble for users of the joint use dock. 1 nrkin(;, 'f prcvide� must not. be sepnrAted fr•)n! the deck b.y eny public rued. -L_ s;+aces . 3 tit' 16. 51,ureli,ie . s ted t2 (c:.eCF. G. p cab,e 1ten; j Eton,, r4;, ra11. -- w-,od GeawaJfGeLvl senwali. coricrete seNw•::l.l. grass and vegetation call- ot:,er (spec;fy) 17• Depth of water at shoreline is ),( ft; at 50 f'.- out is a� 100 f out is Z G -30 REQr;IRED ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: A. DOCK PLAN - ALL APPLICATIONS 6 A dock plan, drawn to scale, showing the shoreline width of this property, thue side property lines and the location, layout and dimensions of all docks, slips and buoys. If off-street parking, dry storage or other on -land functions are intended, these also should be shown on the plan. B. UNINCORPORATED GROUPS OR ASSOCIATIONS 1. A list of the names and mailing addresses of all members and/or slip users. 2. A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use. Note: This copy is not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same by-laws or agreement originally made in (state year? and on file with the Cit•,•." Applicant's initials C. INCORPORATED CLUBS OR ASSOCIATIONS 1. A list of the names, mailing addresses and titles of all corporation officers. 2. A statement as to the total number of members in the club or association. 30C, pc7o members. (-*s4) 3. A certified copy of the articles of incorporation and by-laws of the corporation. Note:- These copies are not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same articles of incorporation and/or by-laws as originally made or last amended in ____ —(state year) and on file with the City." Applicant's initials Pace 4 clf 5 D. ANNUAL LICENSE FEE - ALL APPLICATIONS Joint Use Dock License Application fee according to the cur ent fy Fee Schedule. p-McwAL ficr . , MINIMUM JOINT USE FEE, per year PLUS SLIP FEE for each permanent moorage slip, lift, dry stack, or buoy a slips @ $2.00 each TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION LATE FEE - Renewals Applications for renewal of licenses shall be made no later than February 1 of the license year. The City shall not accept renewal license applications received after February 1 unless the application is accompanied by a late fee of $25.00. REVIEW PROCEDURE When a complete application is received, the application will be reviewed by the City Council and, in the case of new or unusual applications, also by the Planning Commission and Marina Committee. The Council will pass upon the apolication after complete review. THE SUBJECT DOCK MAY BE INSTALLED AND/OR OPENED FOR USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Joint Use Dock License Application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the City's employees and agents to enter upon the property at any reasonable tim.� to perform safety and code compliance inspections. Signe 1, _�/�� f W:�_Date Paqe 5 of 5 \` I rpA( �)) ♦ e• { :w. •/ � �3d -•-JCL1'A Q{iGTN v 4 i. 14 • A+ . ' 1 �+ ,. ,ee� �� - l _ . �� rw r $ •alr t►'A Ike. ► L�+� ` .{ ' � } �_� ��A•� - ` :� 'fin�rtry R :i .. i l_ 1 tobse tteY +• t ._�.L y •` / y-'� �. - S Y •r�I� it#r �` 1 1 •t'• t,' J.6r .r � "'^ ) •rots �.h•9, L'AOO s n . ' i .• j:•• i�S _ A7 i+. ,yt.L�•,- - r� 6 1 Stubbs � •.le7. i 1 u .1i' iM,1 '��1 y✓+ +N1 '� is Bey f.+'�.. tt •.tal:r...:,_ ti,f — way:ata Bar k t• -F _ :� p r •. j Browne !Ba IFall 1 ( • ! e-OF ♦ Aso ., r+./ , l S �.,• atta +• _ 4. �`�' ,c iso..n CW.• ►e.•.t '■ fi.lf ++ Bay�/ al Bays _ �.• -{L-- is `� �� Y 8t �9/- EC ryst"- e.4LWl.etatPIT ris.re Woodland �. t° �"_: `L fi�rr_ • '3! and �"� :....• ••• _ ,•..,,•,I _ - .rr_ 1 a . �T ` �.EY. � aTet .:.�, '�� � .�� � � Sli I"a�^ /' ��1``` _ ' .weave=.,w BRY '✓ zr �✓• .�?' r i S,ItitA Bay♦�-��-ttta. \' ► t .o +.. %�_' �~ • L. ^+ fj i$+\)p►oint - i o �}',•�M`L'• �+; . ik, aonn. Bay r �1 ode, y~ - y-• �'� C•� ! lrrV�La` �u•.wn•._• !� Gib.. '�a�'+o3 •�•' .+ 1 f t �- - . L' - ak. Hrs 'Plod" }Y : 8 /Y Cew.., t y6 a 1 S O .M ,•mil : •a�T' �+.rr�,' L rle i�1 r. / _ \ .c . ``. �r1°A �•�M. r �.*.' Oa y oN ~'el-e�' - �•.,�16 .1+r,. r •S• r !�•-�. , io o..• • A �1 t e'`'i Minnetonka • Ir _ } . l�. • a !S G : N.•ne �r. ng •% ass ri?1�, t t r Beach o '`' '� i( "a��` •� a � .. v... ./ �• ,.� ter. .• 1 ac:'�It�.a, t. �,..a,�"^"aL. �. "�..c_?,.a - 3fK . is + � � + � Ia � ~ 1 t 1. „�°' !- '� r.a,• r; •• a Lafayette �i „I>•' f �' �5,y�rt 1 • `t-' �. I ��' ,moo"'w 1� ,,y, s.l�. �• -� v- o .r -1 y �` a ;� Deephaven; OU'T7 '\ Y la{• A� .� a •lr ++ �.. i Pe�INf(I •r� " 73 s.nn .11 C {• �! . 1 •.+,,� j �-v 0 i .- th fr..L+ k r '�•.� r� a� �� I�tr l . ` " I'r®' s� - c p :. 1+ 4�� J �C'•�• - ' .. J. -.+! �!nN.1•.II'(cyi f .,,; r'-j•* A, f `!•�' - t ti.• `. o s • iry.�� f �� .. 1°Ma�.en �: <, j"+• , rl.'w`: 1 :. SC - .I,M ej +rr �1 C {j.�pt_-ter «,r... .f U. f� �t .' 1� �'•`t '� .':..'ram if i' \" ��•..•Y.�.r. - Pe•'T•.2� 6rsv•' f s 4 �{,�r�' ?'-"r G..a.. •A LA4•:, `` C..ea . + •�.___•_•_•__�-i .tll � tea• •r• +... . ` ` ?y tom.,.... eo•ny-� ' Po.. • , 1 6.N ` r�_ , "t . �+ - �S,r.� 1---L•�'i..—. „d... _'�• • 'Sa..r" ./' �/ �F'_y� r �•...t !. ri, « Vc TOnke 33Y �Ir.n. * ..is . •7• �' Pt it ee•.e t;i, Island Park11.1 Echo Bay .l 1 r :'•� i p • • $aY •! t S So.•,• A i (/' •;�,j-'•, c.e.•14r• T pA°, D11. Day I.Nne t- C.nc••r M.c•,-49 •�1 �att.. '� .!Y461. I!�-J •rl- wiiN �_�^E '► 28 . .e..t V f Faf { itMnwpod ? r C a0 c �� _ �� •,••yf► res: Sbe, w•.•e I �' !, 2. 8o tr.r P1 1'/��.• = :7 . 25:..y,- .: .`... -. ` 1 . �3%... Cidenn Bay Pent �' a ��'"'•/'/ ��'"i_/' �.. • ` r'r a `• ►r° V ee, e . 29 /"..: _ 28 !% • 1. Excelsior, p 411 r .3 , SFIO. •"wodD�=�-'•. �\ 1fi�^�:•,'-r __ '_ F; �,�.- r n j w te.a jf� reka M�� f� ' ' I �� • `' I RIc I • -..-. • , •.r • Cn••. i . IAene • k; 14.neN.• '• ,�. _' �(!.. .,. 3A% ti� , ` -� �• 1 :�... _ Sep t . r - �L 1 ` J ti' 1 f7 . SrJI t f /• i .•'0 C •.VL' ;,, : I TT, 7• •.r . 1 I V y�. �•�1- �. - ;?. `ts �.�y�!`�\.NM 3617. _ I )tl/ _;,� �i. +• /" it 33. r.�'• ~j,,.,,tjy :'t .t-�/-i�':� e ♦ ��-?.; '•w I / 1. � •� JQ.' i1-.. dl'• tP•Irb�;.�e•. ii i.` ��� `I S �� 1 � L�,. 1 � ' c- SME lo25W ., Sraitol.w l .�± 8 I �•r+---.L.•-err--�r—�Tz: _ :=---a eMAN Sl `- Lake e 1. �►. r��••� al•l•.� r'I" _^ CONTOUR INTERVAL FEETki - +6 w1u.11s M[Aw SEA lfrLl -i Z BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP L.*4CD Area 40, Veterans Bay `� _ , J I _ ( �. � `• :I IFM1Tef/ � fN.S MAI (pAI /L-LS —IN NATIONAL MAP ACCuaACr $24401sUS take FOR SALE By U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Of NVER COLORAOO W225 OR *AS"1NGf0N O C '07.1 ,., .4• _ ! �•� C . i.% 1• +"1, •... 7,a A IDLDIR DLuN.a.NG Ir1.OGRA+44.0 NAPS AND STYI.OIS IS AVAAAML Oft uIVIRII Lslo.-id ;ete"dnj c4m C, 1,10 BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS LEGAL DESCRIPTION Government Lot One (1), Section Fourteen (14), Township One 11und1^d Seventeen (117), Range Twenty-three (23); and Government Lot Two (2), Section Twenty-three (23), Township One Hundred Seventeen (117), Range Twenty-three (23); and That Part of Government Lot Three (3), Section Twenty -Three (23), Township One Hundred Seventeen (117), Range Twenty-three (23), commencing at the northeast corner of said Government Lot (3), Section 'Twenty-three (23); thence SouthWesterly along the lake shore to the Northeast corner of Lot. A, Morse Island Park; thence 350 feet to Lake Minnetonka to the East line of said Lot Three (3); thence North to the place of beginning. CIE FLU Y� a K 3F 1--1 I ock ,c 1 iirac.i� a/2,2q - L.,oq rn -.fe,44, .1E .ice, q�'tEci�� N¢.��boR1 2y/1 -01 toy/-06i - /vo - am %y ". 3 / �A� i.tJ/4iE,� f• iuc Ts I -�ti� tomF4 fFp 14 P's N �Z L� t._ EP-A 1co,tt MUNICIPAL CUITIFICATION F;,,l DOCK LICEMSE ZON11IG APPROVAL FOR 1986 year Under the terms of Lake Minnetor., :)nser.vation District Ordinance #1, the following provisic-.is apply: Sec*ion 1.05 The provisions of this ordinance shall not supersede any municipal ordinance (e) which establishes zoning provisions regulating land use adjacent to the Lake which are not in conflict with this ordinance. Section 1.06 Nothing in this ordinance is inten-�d to authorize the use, rent, sale, lease or conveyance of dock space or mooring facilities in the Lake contrary to municipal zoning laws. Hoard of. Governors, Bid; Island Veterans Camp (Qavid M. Miller, chairman), c/o Joe Backess 3416 Jidana_ Lane, Mtka, MN 55345 Aiame and address of dock applicant Big Island Vetere -ins Camp on Big Island Title, description, and location of docks I certify that the above dock license applicant has met the zoning ordinance requirement- of Orono _ for the (Municipality) property described for 1986 and is entitled to a Lake Minnetonka Year Conservation District flock and/or mooring area license thereun(i� for slips and/or m�7urin�,. Authorized Signature) :an i A f 0. L)4: L3 SGf! I E do /,) r V U �) Lo`K L.SE 1917r. A L,►.k s{Ru.ci„ac.S, Sl,i,n `*D 1%40ck 5►v-•k a/lt-q ►o A)- Me, �? 4 bogs J tS-d� - ivo - sM / 1 � j •— / Vit) 'Vol A A) 444rca0 er .., RECF_1% DOCK LICENSE ,, Lake Minnetonka Conservation District DEC 31985 _ LMCD Fee L.M.C.O. Village response due received (for LP1CU use Because this form is to be copied, please use black ink or type — I APPLICATION: MULTIPLE. DOCK, RAMP, License Year _ No. of Boats_ _ Boat Density Index_ Can be reached at phone 0 AND/OR MOORING LICENSE 9,41-j o l.`�O V e V,i'_)1qT5) � 1 erda". (Print o7r-_type o/wne)} s name) �^ is address the owner of land in the City of -�>> a, p Business name: /(J - A (if different from owner) (Street address) ,!Y7y e -7 7 7 Phone; if no answer, call: Phone; if no answer, call: (Mailing address if different from street address) which is riparian to LMCD area (s)_ _ jlg�r.�,4 Y , Number(s) Lake Minnetonka applies p pp pursuant to LMCD Code Chapter III, Section 3.08, for a new or revised Multiple Dock License, in accordance with all data and other information sub- mitted herewith and made a part hereof. The following must accompany this application (see samples): (a) Locator map (d) Site plan of dockage to over- (b) County plat of the area lay survey (c) Certified survey and (e) Dock construction detail sheet legal description (f) Gas storage detail sheet I. Type of application ( )Outlot association ( )Municipal (')Co, rcial marina (please check one): ( )Multiple dwelling ( )Transient ( )Private club ( )Private multiple ()Other (explain) t� Ge-n- 2 ,, 2. Intended use of facility- 4 Pried a r, ('.,�-sa�i•r� , T 3. Abutting property owners at the lakeshorei Ncrth or West k _A,,, tam -✓ (Name and MAILING address) South or East ��!C)_ N p---__ (Name and MAILING address) Other affected parties (Names and MAILING addressesv- attach -sheet if necessary) 4. All required permits, licenses and approvals have been obtained from the City in which the multiple dock is located, and the MN DNR: Yes _ No/000 _ 77- 5. Public liability ino-;uraAmountce: Amount $��) ; Companyf"t�1" ,N 7 a i Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 2 Application: Multiple Dock, Ramp, / and/or Mooring License Name /�ir I.S7 ,f_r•c.J .P �`'►'`t' 6. Maximum number of Watercraft Availability Units (WAU): by Storaze at slips . . . . . . . . __=WAU at slides . . . . . . . WAU at lifts . . . . . . . . �_ WAU► at moorings . . . . WAU at tie-ons . . . . . . . ` WAU at off -Lake storage . _ WAU other (explain): WAU by Use for rent, lease, etc. __j2_WAU for service work . . jC) WAU for company use _WAU for private use . . . . . . _WAU for transient use . . . . . . _WAU other (specify): WAU WAU -WAU WAU TOTAL WAU applied for: ==/=�- =WAU TOTAL WAU applied for: WAU (The number of moorings under -,r arate District Mooring Area permit is_�_) 7. Site Lake frontage Q feet. 8. WAU computation: Frontage.__ feet t 50 Q _ L � WAUs allowable under the one -boat -per -fifty -foot rule. (lf this number is less than the total WAUs applied for in 06 above, an appiication for a Special Density Permit is req uired.) All commercial (and others, where applicable) must provide the following additional information: 9 Check the nature of !eryces�and parking provided: a) Boat storage _ k$�r,n� _ '%A_+ number of parking spaces___z b) Launching ramps____ __& del t, _ ; number of parking spaces_—_ Times ramp, is open for pulic use: fV ramp overflow parking_ __ c) Sales_ ) ; number of parking spaces _ !_ d) Service _ _ number of parking spaces ___ e) Boat rentals -' _4 ; number of parking spaces f) Restaurant _ _ number of parking spaces J_ g) Other (explain) number of parking spaces- h) Parking not required �_ ; reason_ 10TAU. parking spaces Lake etonka Conservation District 3 Application: Multiple Dock, mp, and/or Mooring i lcense Name 10. Sanitary facilities are provided: Yes No ; number of units 11. Boat toilet pumping service is provides: Yes No�_ 12. ALL APPLICATIONS: Base fee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 50.00 Watercraft Availability Units @ $10.00 + Q r, (IJI Total fee enclosed $ L v I certify that the information provided herein and the attachments hereto are true and correct statements, and I understand that any license issued may be revoked by the District for violation of the LMCD Code, including Section 3.02, Subdivision 10: "No person shall sell, rent, or lease for the storage of boats or watercraft any space within dock use areas other than at commercial docks; provided, however, that such space may be rented or leased at docks of apartments solely for the storage of boats or watercraft owned by residents of the apartments." I consen�to permitting officers and agents of the District to enter the premises at all reae le times to investigate and to determine whether the Code of the Distric s being c plie with. �L Authorized signature Title Ao,) / Date � /,e, Relationship to owner_, Return this application and attachments to: Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 402 Fast lake Street Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Phone: (612) 473-7033 10/84 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO ISSUE A JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE TO BOARD OF GOVERNORS, BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 1986 TO DECEMI3ER 31, 1986 WHEREAS, the City of Orono, i:ereinafter "City" is a municipal. corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota and has the authority and responsibility under Minnesota Statutes, State Statute 4,12, et. sec;. and State Statute 462, et. seq., to proter.t the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City and other members of the public within the City; and WHEREAS, the City shares concurren` iirisdiction over the primary harbor limit of the City of ;'-ono with the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and the Department of Natural Resources of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the regulation of the navagabl.e waters involves an exercise of police power of the Sate, ',MCD, and the City of Orono, all of which have adopted rulers to ensure to all equal enjoyment of the public rights and equal protection frc.m activity on jr near the public waters and on the land within the City which, if unregulated, may be detrimental to the public health, safety a;id general welfare; a nrl WHEREAS, the regulations of the DNR, IMCD, and the City of Orono regulate the property rights of the riparian owners both as to residential. owners and the commercial marina owners to the extent prohibiting any interference with the public waters adjoining their property. The LMCD, DNR and City of Orono must fulfill their trusteeship over the public waters by protecting against interference by anyone, including those whr) assert the commonlaw rights of riparian owners, whether or not, they he commert_ial marinas or residential owners; WHEREAS, as to Lake Minnetonka, a mutual right of enjoyment exists between and is shared by riparian owners and the public generally, no one riparian owner has exclusive privileges over Laker Minnetonka. The only additional private right that any riparian owner may have over the public generally is to construct one dock to the navigable depth of the publi- waters. There can be no dispute but that the public generally and each riparian owner to bake Minnetonka ha:: tho right to use the entire surface area of Lake Minnetonka for all suitable purposes in common with all other riparian owners. This right is a right not only to members of the publ ir• but the right to each riparian owner. Page 1 of 2 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. This mutual right of enjoyment wh).cj; is shared by riparian owners and the public generally includes the recreational benefits of the lake such as boating and fishing therein; the riparian owner has no exc?usi-e privileges to these rights; and WHEREAS, Lake Minnetr.,nka is capable of substantial beneficial public use only as l.onr, as all riparian users of the lake are regulated in such a way as t- ensure there is no abuse of the limited riparian rights; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted reasonable regulations regarding the construction and use of la -shore and dock facilities when such facilities are used and maintained by three or more families, which regulations incluCe the ;annual licensing of Joint Use Docks pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to set forth the above noted general conditions and concerns and the following special conditions as they relate to an application for an annual Joint Use Dock License described on Exhibit A attached, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby directs the Ftaff to issue a Joint Use Dock License according to the facts and conditions noted on Exhibit A attached. Adopted by the City Council of the: City of Orono at their meeting on the 24th day of February, 1986. lim Adams, Acting Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Cler%: �^ Page 2 of 2 CITY OF ORONO EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF ISSUANCE FOR ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE I. LICENSEE: Big Island Veterans Camp Board of Governors Dock Address: Big Island - Reccro Lot #1 Agent: Stuart li. Gorney (Treasi,.er) Address: 3240 North Indiana Avenue, Robbinsdal.e, MN Licensee is: unincorporated homeowner's group incorporated homeowner's association unincorporated club or recreation group �XX _ incorporated club or recreation group other License Period - January 1, 1986 to December 31, 1986 II. BOAT DENSITY The number of in -place boat slips, lifts and buoys sha 1 1. not exceed the number shown on the attached plan, Exhibit B, and in accordance with Resolution 938, in no case shall the number of authorized boat slips, lifts, or buoys exceed the number permitted in the prior year's license. Authorized Boat Density per attached plan: Bay Transient (Day use only) Slips Permanent Moorage Slips Boat, Lifts Sub -Total: Slips at Dock Offshore Buoys Maximum Boats n Water Maximum Boats per prior license MAXIMUM BOAT DENSITY Lower Lake `14 0 0 14 _ 0 14 1.6 (2 buoys under previous license) 14 Exhibit A Resolution No. Page 2 Exceeding this maximum boat density, r exceeding the number of permitted slips, lifts or buoys is a vioi,.,tion of this license subject to revocation and/or prosecution for violation of Section 5.42 Subdivision 2 of the Orono Municipal Code. III. DOCK LAYOUT The dock structure or layout authorized by this license shall be as showy on attached Exhibit B. Any changes in this layout shall to subject to prior review and approval of the City Council. IV. SPECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinance of the City and/or the LMCD. The issuance of this l..cense is subject to full compliance with these conditions. Failure to comply with these conditions is cause for license revocation and/or prosecution by the City. overnight use of the licensed dock facilities is specifically Prohibited without a Conditional Use Permit. V. Nothing in this license shall confer upon any person for the benefit of any property any vested right to use Lake Minnetonka or the premises in a manner permitted by this resolution, but the use of Lake Minnetonka and the premises shall remain subject to such regulations and ordina-yes as the City and other competent regulatory authorities shall deem necessary from time to time in the public interest. .sue To: Orono Council Members 01TY OF OROW From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator Date: February 20, 1986 Subject: #842 Robert Zimmerman, 3415 Crystal Bay Road - Variance Zoning District - LR-1C, 1/2 Acre Application - Garage, deck additions; proposed removal of existing hardcover resulting in net increase of 2.2% hardcover in 75-250' -tone. Proposal: Existing Hardcover 75-250' = 26.3% Proposed Hardcover 75-250' = 28.5% No change or slight decrease in 0-75' hardcover (existing 0-75' = approximately 11% attributable to driveway plus 23% attributable to Crystal Bay Road) List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Original Proposal Jung_ 1984 (40-44% hardcover) Exhibit E - Revised Proposal. Exhibit F - Hardcover Calculations Exhibit G - Memo 7/13/84, Minutes 7/16/84 Exhibit }i - Letter To Applicant's Builder. 2/4/86 The applicant appeared before the Planning Commission in 1984 requesting variances to hardcover and side setback to allow construction of various additions to his residence. On 'i16/64, Planning Commission reviewed the proposal and tabled suliect to applicant scaling down his plans so that there would be le,>s of an increase in hardcover. Applicant has now revised his plans considerably so that the increase -n hardcover is relatively minimal, and requiring no side setback variance. Please see Exhibit E. Applicant proposes to remove some minor sheds at the rear of his house and replace with a 22'x24' attached garage and apron. In addition, he is requesting to add a deck to the front of the home. A deck with standard railing at main floor level would be a non -encroachment, and would tint affect the neighbor's views. in this case, the proposes; der•k wi 1 1 be located behind the "average deck setback line" of the adjacent properties. The applicant proposes to remove two areas of unnecessary gravel and the existing garage (or shed) at the rear of the property. This wi l l yield a net. hardcover increase in the 75-250' zone of 2.21�, rather than the 151-plus increase proposed previously. Zoning File #842 February 20, 1986 Page 2 of 2 Planning Commission reviewed the revised proposal on February 18, 1986 and recommended approval (5-0) as proposed, finding a hardship in that applicant has no usable existing garage. Staff recommends approval of a 3.5% hardcover variance in the 75- 250' zone, conditioned on the applicant removing 2 areas of gravel and the existing detached garage structure, per the attached resolution. --=--= CITY OF ORUNO '� EXHIBIT � L� VARIANCE APPLICATION ~]' n vee $100.0p ��� � -I�i G r After -the -Fact .00 PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 3111S- e'- icy-+ &I Property Identification Number (P.I.D.7-Z3 4(3 411A_ Please check one -- Is the property abstract or torrens? AV00w, Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name Roo / ti , 2 111 M f Phone •�� / - "��'i g Mailing Address .3ci/S'- Cae?L St7. h�4q%Arm M/V -------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- OMLIER Name �AMg, 0}S AQOy Phonc> __�FaM t A S RQoJ� Mailing Address --t,n M t �4 4 '4 6b U E Date Property Acquired �� 1 � ►_ (month/year ) I (do) (do i;c)t) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District 1 C- Present Use of Property x Pesidential Other. (specify) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Cost ,ion Cost Describe request in detail:I, VARIAM= AMU I RED Lot Area I,ot Width ✓ Hardcover Setback Variances ( Front _✓Side _ Rear) Other �'- V4 I I F P L, G'M I T -�M �y�-ra-------.r►-a--r-rr--r r - r- a r- - r �. -. -. - -.-.- r a r r a araarrr a r.a a a-.. --ra-.-.� .� --a lover) HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning .L "cleidr..t.o ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: _ -!541, 41?,OtAs_ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Appi?.ca"t-ion Form. 2. Certified Property :owners List .)f owners within 150' (you c. n obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) _ . Stamped, le,4al sized envelopes (# 10) pre -addressed to each or the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificates of survey. 5. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Ownt.r must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicanthereby agrees to provide: all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agreestopayallfeesand/or unusual expenses incurred in revi,ewof this application, and certifies tha; !-he information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge Applicant's signature_ Data (V OWNERS SIGNATURE. The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to authorizes reasonable entr!r onto the property agents, commission members, and Council members and verificp'ion of this request. Owner's c l 3nature this application arid' further by City staff, consultants, for purposes of investigation Date _ Z. . ,e)� Applicant must have -all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. ` FoWN OF OADNO -t • Vr�J .� i i; 71 [� ePy Pob , 4• t �LOI Ob r , 2 t0 ♦C 4! at t•� 34 37 t 3 r O/ a s 1 • �l �l �• 10 3. (i6) 34 t.so 11 / z7 �) •+) to .c �• is 124 I1 so to s 13 M 17 I 1! to 1 , `fl / s /10 f= ' M w I7 �p q N 1413 fl 10 • • f 1 • i ♦ i ! 1 R to 3. 40) • i !rr� 1 lt1 �." 91 "k, f AN ME r A ip 1. • •, f GIs+I: a a .'1 ,,M, • ! s t. 4JO- ».: k .. (.e.. c.+t o r RLRI DATE 06/22/84 BATCH 003 33 17-117-23 43 0001 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME STATE !AND DEPT TAXPAYER STATE LAND DEPT NAME/ADDR �A 33 17-117-23 43 0120 FRCP ADDR 03435 CRYSTAL BAY RD OWNER NAME THOMAS E PETESCH TAXPAYER ROBERT WILLIAM MIELENZ �. NAME/ADDR 3435 CRYSTAL BAY RD ORONO MI 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0124 PROP ADOR 02264 SHADYW000 R9 OWNER NAME EVELYN S TRUTNAU ,�. TAXPAYER EVELYN S TP.UTNAU NAME/ADDR 2264 SHADYW000 RD WAYZATA MN 55391 r 33 17-117-23 44 0025 PROP AD)R 02205 BAYVIEW PL do01.`IER NAME BARBARA J SIPPRELL TAXPAYER BARBARA J SIPPRELL NAME,AOrlZ 2205 BAYVIEW PLACE WAYZATA MN 55391 Av- - HENNEPIN COL"4TY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 17-117-23 43 0116 03407 CRYSTAL BAY RD R S A E C NICHOLS ROBERT S A EL"4ICE C NICHOLS 3407 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 012'_ 03445 CRYSTAL BAY Rl: GLORIA MC DONALD GLORIA MCDONALD 3445 CRYSTAL BAY RD POLITE 1 WAYZATA MN 391 38 17-117-23 44 DC21 033Q9 CRYSTAL BAY RD SANDRA K GEORGE SANDRA K GEORGE 3399 CRYSTAL BAY POAD MINNETONKA BEACH MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0069 02300 OLIVE AVE R A D HISE RALPH A DOROTHY HISE 2300 OLIVE AVE NAVARRE MN 55391 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 4 38 17-117-23 43 0118 0341S CRYSTAL BAY RD ROBERT H ZIMMERMAN ROBERT H ZIMMERMAN 3415 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN 5539I 38 17-117-23 43 0122 03447 CRYSTAL F-AY RD GEORGE C SWANBECK GEORGE C SWANBECK 11021 ABBOTT LA MINNETONCA MN 55343 38 17 117-23 44 0022 03405 CRYSTAL BAY RD JOE DARLING ETAL J 0 DAP.LING 3405 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD WAYZATA MN 55391 TOTAL. BATCH 003 coot: I CERTIFY THP' THE FACTS REPRESENTED APE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTA"'UN OF INFORMATION AS IT APPLERTY HIS DATE ON THE RECCPCS OF THE ;iUINEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMEN OF PR TA[ 7TION. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AHD BELIEF' + A DATE BY ` L; 1 A ' 5d CITY OF ORS' HMM CORK ?mM9WAC4 x APMW I 90AV wo- CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 4 IIIE-10 ft vc eti, .1 1S4JO .--= - .. am LAND SURV9*e0WS n- An- A* L Swab 0 w A. w zq AN 'p Wit, hori'vity vef Ify that h1h AM q,na "I kitpurkurwol A th& Land Alidtif t#w lq Arid .ti 041444- V'm r4arhtM "Ill. it Ativ, In-ti, tot, -fi %Alff 1. d thipi Apt : , ;.'-14 .011 "'i; , 901d AO oi 2-74 HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS 3415 Crystal Bay Road Existing 75-250' Hardcover 12,024 s.f. in 75-250' zone x .25 = 3,006 s.f. allowed Existing house and attached sheds (1980 survey) 14.5 x 22.1 304.5 21.9 x 36.15 791.7 5.0 x 12.2 61.0 17.4 x 8.1 140.9 = 1,379.8 s.f.- 5.8 x 6.5 37.7 5.0 x 8.8 44.0 Garage in rear (shed) 12.4 x 16.3 = 202.1 2.4 x (12.4-2.5-1.6) = 19.9 222 s.f.. d(c Gravel in front 26 x 12 312 s.f. --- Gravel on side 125 x 10 = 1,250 s.f. 3,163.8 s.f. "-" 31163.8 = 26.3% existing 75-250' 12,024 Proposed 75-250' Hardcover House 14.5 x 22.1 21.9 x 36.15 5.0 x 8.8 _ 1,197 5.0 x 12.2 Attached Garage 24 x 22 = 528 Front Deck 10.8 x 21.9 4.0 x 13.+/- 290 10' wide driveway 10' x 100' - 1,000 apron 17' x 24' 408 3,423 s 3,423/12,024 = 28.5* Proposed 75-250' Conditioned on: 1. removal of rear garage shed (222 s.f.) 2. removal of 25' rear portion of grave' driveway (250 s.f.) 3. removal. of front gravel parking area (312 s.f.) TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, AsL;istant Zoning Administrator DATE: July 13, 1984 SUBJECT: #842 - Robert Zimmerman - 3415 Crystal Bay Road -- Variance Application - house addition on a lakeshore lot Zoning District - LR-IC - one-half acre Variances requested - Side setback - hardcover a) Side setback variance Required - 10' Existing - 9-10' Proposed - 8' Variance - 2' or 20�. b) Hardcover variance 75-250' setback area 12,024 sq. ft. Allowed hardcover 25% = 3,006 sq. ft. Existing harcover = 3,098 sq. ft. = 26% Existing hardcover variance = 92 sq. ft. = 1% Proposed hardcover = 4,805 sq. ft. = 40% Proposed hardcover variance = 1,799 sq. ft. or 15% for an increase of 14% hardcover Optional proposed hardcover - t 4,105 sq. ft. - 34% Using "ribbon" driveway, resulting in a 9% variance List of ExhibitF Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owner's List Exhibit D - Old Survey Exhibit E - Site Plan Exhibit F - Architects alternate paving proposals Exhibit G - Hardcover calculations Applicant is requesting to construct an addition to the. rear of his existing home, including an attached garage with driveway apron. The house addition continues the existing sidewall which angles toward the rear lot line, creating a proposed setback of 8' where 10' is required. In addition, the hardcover proposed in the 75--25C' zone is 40% compared to the existing 2F% hardcover. 0842 - Robert Zimmerman July 13, 1984 Page 2 i-lease review Exhibit F, the architects proposed alteratives to the caxtensive driveways required. The "ribbon roadway" appeals to me for this site since lateral vehicle mobility is liiaited by the property line :ind house structure so that a vehicle would likely only use the 2-1.5' wide pads in going to the rear yard. This could reduce proposed c3-iveway hardcover by up to 700 sq. ft. alone the west side of the house, reducing the total proposed hardcover to 34%. You will note when you visit this property, that the gravel along the west side of the house extends back about 50' past the existing house, and appears to be of relatively recent origin. We have a 1980 survey on file showing a proposed two -car detached garage to the rear of the lot, which was apparently never constructed. The neighbor to the cost has reviewed the site plan and expressed concern that the additional hardcover will force additional runoff onto his property, which already is inundated by runoff from the rear and far side. Applicant should be requested to address these concerrj. Applicant does appear to have a hardship in that the house has no k3psement due to its elevation near lake level. However, my immedia _e reaction .is that perhaps building upward rather than rearward, and r.ot forcing the garage to the rear of the property, would allow ,,r a house of comparable square footage without the major increases in hardcover. Planning Commission may ask for a reduction in the proposal. The COL,IC11 has approved hardcover variances of 4% and 8% in this neighborhood recently. A 9% variance would appear to be consistent. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ME'L'TING HELD JULY 160 1984. PAGE 9 #82.7 C.D. WILLIAMS Assistant 'Zoning Administrator Gaff ron .z-)ted that the drainage problem is a general. problem in -:he area, not specific to this property, and should be reviewed by the Public Works Director. Gaf fron stated that only a 3 percent increase in hardcover is proposed. ( t842-ROBERT 'ZINC 2MP;i 3415 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 10:35 - 10:55 P.M. Kelley asked if the applicant was proposing a d ck. Williams stated that a second story deck is proposed but that it is not considered hardcover. Sime moved to approve the Williams' variance application finding that no additional land is available and applicant has addressed hardcover issue and kept hardcover Lo 30% where 27% was existing and applicant is meeting side setbacks and subject to the following conditions: 1. No other variances, will be granted. 2. Public Works Director to :.00k into drainage problem with neighbors. 3. Hardcover not to exceed 30%. Callahan seconded. Motion, Ayes (4), trays (1). Minority Opinion - Rovegno voted nay. Rovegno stated that this entire proposal is within the 75' lakeshore setback line and that the applicant should reduce the hardcover. Robert Zimmerman, C.M. Gables, and J. F'rischmann were present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was no one present from the audience for this application. Chairperson: Goetten closed the public hearing at 10:55 p.m. Rovegno stated that the hardcover should be cut down and that the applicant should consider going upward rather than expanding the house outward. Kelley stated ti:at there was too much hardcover on the property and that the applicant should go upward. Zimmerman stated that the footing might not be able to hold a :second story but that he would have it inspected. Callahan moved to table the Zimmerman variance applicant to allow the applicant to cut down on the hardcover and to consider expanding the house upward rather than outward. Kelley seconded. Motion, Ayes Is % %1 i n N i:ITY of GIRO)\ 4 !'u,t (Ifficv 1t)% f4;•('rystaI Iiay MvInesota i.,.,�_'i•Muni, ,paI (Yffires i" On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka February 4, 3 98(; Clinton M. Gables American Builders & Associates nc. 3600 Shoreline Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 RE: Request for permit to construct attached garage at 3415 Crystal Bay Rd Dear Mr. Gables: We are in receipt of your request for a permit for an attached garage at 3415 Crystal Bay Road. Attached to the req..est was one set of plans and two copies of a certificate of survey. We also have on file a building permit application dated November 4, 1985. My records indicate that on November 7, 1985, I left a message of your answering machine noting that a variance is required in order to add the garage. I have no record that you ever responded to that message. Mr. Zimmerman applied for a variance to construct an addition and attached garage .in June 1984. That application was tabled by the Planning Commission on July 16, 1984 to allow applicant to consi- der revising his plans. That application was never completed, but ►nab be reactivated at Mr. Zimmerman's request. We cannot issue the garage permit unless a variance is granted to allow hardcover in excess of the 25% Hardcover normally allowed in the zone 75-250' back from the lakeshore. The following items would be needed in order to reactivate the variance appl.icati.on: 1) 12 legal size, F,tampel envelopes (City w:.11 address them for re -notification of neighboring property owners). 2) Submit a copy of your revised survey showing the exact dimensions of existing and proposed driveway and parking areas, and indicate any structures intended to be removed. 3) Submit existing and proposed hardcover calculations (form enclosed). 11t IL1)1%(,R /fINN(, 4?17151 • AI?NINISIR4Ti00% & PI%AV( 1 4?17458 • P( RLN WORK% 4717IL49 AS%I- SSI%(, If Items 1-3 above are submitted by Monday, February 10, 1986 by 4:30 PM, this application can be reviewed by the Piannind Commission at their February 18th meeting. If the Planning Commission recommends approval, the item would be presented to the City Council on March loth for final action. We also would need 1 additional set of. plans for the addition for review by the Building Inspector. Please contact me as soon as possible regardin, your plans to proceed with the variance application, or if you have any questions. Sincerely, ichael P. Gaffrort� Assistant Zoning Administrator enc: Hardcover Calculation sheet 7/17/84 r `ice, 7/16/84 PC Minutes cc: Robert Zimmerman 3415 Crystal Bay Rd. Wayzata, MN 55391 MPG/pp �''�fi-' r �`- • j'�,�.r' SURVEY �� •_,,,,�� -�++ 44 .J ./ YORi - oad _ � `,CST_ _ ,_ � �t..� _SO,d - •' 7 If Q looSY I I Jf 0 /H��.,I � ,,� + .a •iMoPosFd c3ara4 f 4 Exit+- ti v i' J o i� R 11 q r-ice, oil1 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. — -- _ A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL 7.ONING CODE .,.�CTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 FILE #842 WHEREAS, Robert ii. Zimmerman (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 3415 Crystal Bay Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 2, Block 1, "Wiley's Park" (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the construction of an attached garage and deck which would increase the hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone to 28.5% where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #842. 2. The property is located in the I,R-1C Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 18, 1986, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: A) Applicant's hardship is that there is no existing usable garage. 11) The proposed variance -is consistent with variances re- cently granted elsewhere in the neighborhood. C) The proposal includes a slight decrease in the 0-75' hardcover. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page I of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the appli- cant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the construction of an attached garage and deck which will increase hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone to 28.5% where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed: 1. A variance is granted to a l low the fol lowing specific additions (also see Exhibit. A attached): a) 22'x24' attached garage at rear of existing house. b) 10.8'x21.9' and 3'xl4.5' deck at front of existing house. c) 10' wide driveway extending 1.00' rearward from the 75' lakeshore setback lane, and driveway apron of approximately 24'x18' in front of garage. 2. The maximum allowable 75-250' hardcover as a result of the granting of the variance is 3425 square feet or 28.5%. Applicant is notified that any future additions of hardcover on the property will likely not be approved by the City without concurrent removals of existing hardcover. 3. As a part of this variance approval, applicant shall remove the following 'toms of existing hardcover prior to final inspection of tht additions (also see Exhibit A attached): a) removal of rear garage shed (2:' square feet), b) removal of 25' rear portion of gravel driveway (250 square feet), c, removal of front gravel parking area to retain a maximum width of 10' for driveway purposes only (removal of approximately 312 square feat in 75-250' zone). Page 2 of 4 f.-Ity of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4. The deck a 1 lowed on the f ront of the house sha 1 1 be no higher than the main floor of the house, plus the standard railing. Any enclosure of the deck wi 11 f irst require a variance to the average lakeshore setback. 5. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (February 24, 1987). 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code; shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain c title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 24th day of February, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Tim Adams, Acting Mayor Property Owner IIacie 1 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this _ day of _ 1986 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acki.)wledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) on this day of A,1986, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared _ known to me to be the person(s) described —in -and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 4 of 4 G�C� tlgi T r, CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY � ^ 148{, �/ffy � �e�rllYtl. Pfl1. LAND SURVEYORS / V •P� I � C-RM L (Lys ve� I low Nt M a.e� ZA o I q 99 of (lot Off 0 f ve , t F ,•:i•I! TT1 Ltt "l1c1r 1, I r %e M II•hv t 1111r Ihat'iti►w�ur A Irw A!"I r1,: 1. 1 i IvIr1 ctllAt1.. n ,.1 .1 hus ,•L ,d IN buurldar I*R 4 Ih,: la 1,d +,ht)va doex-rilsed and of the Im.1t IN �l► 4 AI IF 411,111• • LI .11ry, tlet l c'.n and all >. iv illk elx rIar hmt ntm. N arg, IM,m ur 'In IWAI 1'^ (laud rtey ram• t v� I�6p �r1 t fiN6 f E a �2 :t 196u To Orono Council Membe,s Frta: Michael P. Gaffron, ;^ •�', ,tant Zoning Administrator Date: Februnry 20, 1986 jq0 Subject: # 'P N.E.D., Inc., "1390" French Cree'• Drive - C. A..-ional Use Permit - resolution Zoning District - RR-lB Application - Conditional U. c RI-r^ t .grade a :Esignated wetland (pond) List of R7hibits Y-:xhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Layout Exhibit C - Property Owners T' t (From Subdivision Application) Exhibit D - L^tter From Apt. nt 1/15/86 Exhibit E - Survey With Propo. al Exhibit F - Glenn .;ook's Letter of 2/7/8f e applican', its r questing perint: on tc -grade nd A" of the French Creek Subdivision North Shore Drive. Pond A is a Desi,rnated Wetland and seLvec as a tat, -.an arc? "debris --ol lection" basin. Per the review of City Enginep- Glenn Cr,ok, (see Exhibit F), the proposed grading may r.nt accompli of the applicants intended purposes, i.e. may noL solve the al, W gym, but will provide a suitable dlick nesting area. Cook has iL nc " +-• at 1) a timber baffle structure be installed to eliminate floatii r-is from movie. wnstream; and 2) placement of s+ 1t fence at the -t during construction. This proposal h },een submit -d to the MCWD for review ane comment. The appli n approval frz-.a that body in th.: 4_mmed:..at.e future. immend approval of ti.e conditional use pe—tit for yr:- designated wetland subject o the ncommendations-4.z,eer any subject to any applicable _ �quirements anc: s :e MCWD. Spoi 1.,i are propcsed to be spread or, undes- ?6 . f t';e site. These should be subje.,• to C i t • .4:Ai t apprev i _ . r;,plir--,nt i,- Avised to check with the DIIR regarding the shaping d see'; ng of the island areas for rbit•k nesting purposes. Stuff recommends appr�•.,al r>er the attached re:.Ulution. CITY OF O GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION --------------------------------•--------------------------------------------- PROPEPTY LOCATION Site Address �1���� I;C i.� 11 il : ,< 1;1) U, ,L Property Identification Numbe• (P. I . D.) Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications ;nlv) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name ;V [, 0, 1 Wit' Phone y 11 -� . r Mailing Address _ 2 1 ? lU�� Y1 �� i (3l.0 1) y20 _1 /+� J-� i`I► OWNER Nar n :. Phone } i Mailing Address _•_ i 12 1 2 ►- , h- , l 71 � 1 � r� lit. �' i ; �+ / ! !'•, n ,) 3 � 1 Date Property Acquired f 1 `' 1' (month/year ) I (do) ((dcornot: also own the adjacent parcels of land. ---------__,-•----------------------------------------------------------- FEES - CONDi .+IONAL -'SE PERMITS $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use $' `.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) i,iplex Credit/Bldg 3'?50.00 d) Con iercial/Industrial Use $Zr 10 f) Land Alteration �-` Grading and filling - 101 •u. yd. or more Seawall, :�taininq wa] Ain 75' of lakeshore PRD/PICA - see fee schedule OTHER APOLICATInNS $1.50.00 Commercial ai f, Picin Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vaca:ion $150.00 Easement Vacation $ 1 0.00 Easement Vacatic. with Stibdivision OTHER APPLICATIONS - CONT. $250.00 Rezoning $200.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Pi )erty Residential Other (specify) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: ---------------------------------------------------------••----------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Arnliu_,Aon Form. 2. Certified PrG.)erty Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain+ this list frer+ :ioiinepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governmen`:; Cernter 348-3211) 3.—amped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -address,- to each of the name on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. j 5. Construction plan, if applicable. 1 6. Plat Map. ----------------------------------------------------•------------------- � The applicant and Property Owner j,sst sign this applicat Please remember that your application is not complate if the above in. -mation has not been included. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT'S SIGNATUPr' The applicant hers agrees -o provide all information required or request., by the Zoning Admin_strator, agrees to pay all fees and. r unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies t t the informa�ion supp]ied is true and correct to the best of his/. r knowledge. Appl.i it's signatures _ Date _ OWNERS S I GNI.TURE The owner hereby acknow aes and agre4�s to this application ar. l further authorized reasonable eiii.y onto the property by City staff, consu'tantr,, agents, commission me%ibers, and Council members for purposes of investigation anc] verification of this request. owner's signature Datr, ---------------------.----------------------------------------------------- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offi s 25 days before thA Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Mot rings are held on the third Mt, day of ea.. h month. Property Owners List for #iU05 Ned Dayton Charles J. Schoen Lawrence J Whalen MTKA CTR of ARTS & ED 2430 North Shore Dr 2435 Scotch Pine Lane P.O. Box 158 orono, MN 55391 Orono, MN 55391 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 H Douglas & Cheryl Hill Stephen & Randi Carlson Dianne J. Mattila 2425 Scotch Pine Lane 1205 Arbor St 1270 Briar St Wayzata, MN 55391 Orono, MN 55391 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Irene Woy_cke Bobby D Johnson Alexander Jentilucci Lox 112 Box 123 1295 Briar St Cr,,stal Bay, MN 55323 Crystal Bay, MN 35323 Orono, MN 55323 Frederick W Curtis Maribeth Andrus Swanson Mabel M. Belt 2180 Prospect Ave 1271 Arbor St Box 162 Wayzata, MN 55391 -'rystal Bay, MN 55323 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Jay & Barbara Wood Marcus & Judy Blue Gammon Brian L. 1285 Arbor St Box 43 Box 62 15601 Sunset Rd Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Dorothy C Levy Faye Hartranet James Stowe 2425 North Shore Dr 1290 Briar St 1250 Briar St Wayzata, MN 55391 Wayzata, MN 553191 Orono, MN 55323 John Story Adeline Quast Gary Printup P.O. Box 91 1251 Briar St P.O. Box 104 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 1261 Briar St Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Joyce F Sprague Emory White 1022 E Gardner St 1291 Briar St Emilio Garcia Wayzata, MN 5',391 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Box lly Crystal Bay, MN 55323 F P roterson Ronald Anderso-i P.O. Box 1f;4 1355 Briar St Elizabeth Johnson Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Box 161 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Albert & Arlene Hoppe Herbert ;shepherd Richard Kiemen Crystal Bay, MN 55323 1335 Briar St 1212 Briar St W,iyzat.a, MN 55391 Orono, MN 55391 property Owners List #1005 lied Dayton Kinqsley Murphy Jr. 22(5 North Shore Dr Wayzata, MN 55391 Karen Bjerkenq 1245 Arbor St Wayzata, MN 55391 Michael McClelland 2170 Minnetonka Ave N P.O. Box 45 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Trust Real Estate NW NATL BANK 7th & MARQ Minneapolis, MN 55480 Maybell Kohls 1224 Briar St Wayzata, MN 55391 TO: Members of the Orono City Council Members o7 the Orono Planning Commission O,,ono City Officials NEC INC [Aatur�il Environmental F)eggns 1212E Wayzata Boulevard Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Phone 612 473-0341 FROM: Ned Dayton, ''resident of NED, INC RE: Conditional Use Permit for French Creek Subdivision DATE: January 15, 1986 In the original French Creek Subdivision Application I neglected to detail specific grading plans for Pond A, which is the easternmost of two natural pond areas within the project, and which is located almost directly North of the Art Center of Minnesota. At the time I wanted to see what: effect the PVC storm sewer connecting this pond to our flowing stream we ld have on the water level and algae situation. In actuality the storm sewer has little affect, and the water level remains less than a foot deep with an unappealing scum cin the surface. I wish to correct that. The proposed plan calls for a regrading and excavation of the pond to a "laximum seven forf depth. The existing bank elevations of the pond will remain the same, and it, wil' not be enlarged in any way. The bank ratios within the pond will be no greater than 5/1, well within the guidelines of safety. Two small islands well be located within the pond and will be planted with habitat suitable for duck nesting. The sides of the pond may be leveled for walking purposes up to a maximum of eight feet; however no significant trees or other vegetation will be reproved to accomplish this. This pond is meant to be retained in its natural state as much as possible. It is estimated by Scnoell and MMadson that approximately 2300 cubic yards ^f material will be rem,)ved. We have a few low spots in other areas of -ench Creek which can absorb this fill. I am hoping to receive Planning Commission approval at its February 18th meeting and Council approval on March 10. these approval dates are necessary in order to do the excavation wore while the ground is still solidly fr07er. Any delay will set the project back a year. I urge your approva-. s\N ELE'1 8 WALKWAY \ 9425 AAr,.,,)ND ^ - 94 3 CISLAN l 93� _ - _ �-- = 950 I--- - It J.,� 1 ti •, � r AT MAP XIST 15 PVC ST�f M ? LEGEND -940 EXISTING CONTOURS r OD D '1 i �000, V � . PREPARED FOR NED DAYTON INC. SCHOELL & MADSON. INS. ENGINEERS. SURVEYORS a PLANNERS loss....:... ......... ..... a... StAl PROD. NO. 60029-001 l3a, Rom, 2335 V 9..-A Jl.,,h...y 36 Sf P-a.. AI........& 55113 N. 61.2 636-4600 February 7, 1986 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 ttn: Mike Gaffron Re: 139-1005 French Creek Subdivision Pond Grading Dear Mike: l hlrr (. Nnnnl,rw,, P f M•dvn N Nrrfnr. /' f. R,e.1/,vd A ! e.11*11 Pt. l .Iron R fook, P E A euh A Gordon. P E Ih'^a, E No,r., P E Raha,A 1{ fair. P E. Rofr,l G kAuerlhrr P F Me,rM L So -via, P f. /k,.e/d C Buge,di. P f hnr A Bouroan, P E Me,k A /l.m •m. PE A /rild. PE. her! T Reu„nenn P F Raba. R PINfrar. P F /bvrd 0 /.ofkoro. P / Cha,le, A L,nkfon Lee M Pow lik, /le,len M. 013" We have reviewed the proposed grading of Pond A on the French Creek Subdivision. The grading will not have a significant effect on the system hydraulics or the water quality of the watershed. The grading of the pond area has been guested to eliminate the existing algae problem and to provide a duck nestin6 area. The design of the pond is such that there will be little effect on the algae problem. The ponds greatest asset at the present time is one of (-ollecting silt and debris from the upstream watershed. 'This will not change with the proposed grading. We would recommend that a timber baffle outlet structure be constructed to eliminate floating debris from entering the downstream watershed. We would also recommend some type of silt fence be constructed at the outlet during -- astruction. The pond is located high up in the drainage basin and away from Lake Minnetonka sip ir that respect does not have a direct impact on the lake. We would recommend that the proposed grading plan be approved. Yours very truly, BORESSTROO, ROSEN", ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC Glenn R. Cook GRC/kas 337ad City of 0. -tONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SUCTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 AND GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 FILE #1005 WHEREAS, N.E.D., Inc. (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owne- of the property located at 1285 French Creek Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter 'City") and legally described as follows: :mot 6, Block 1, French Creek; P.I.D. #10-117-23 32 0005 Lot 7, Block 1, French Creek; P.I.D. #10-117-23 32 0006 Lot 8, Block 1, French Creek; P.I.D. #10-117-23 32 0007 Lot 9, Block 1, French Creek; P.I.D. #10-117-23 32 0008 Out lot B, French Creek; P.I.D. #10-117-23 23 0004 (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant: has xade application to the City of Orono to permit the regrading and dredging of a designated wetland retention basin (known as "Pond A" of the French Creek Plat` for aesthetic and wildlife purposes. Minnesota: NOW, THEF.EFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning i 72 t1005. 2. The property is located in the RR-1R Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission rev .ewed this application on February 18, 1986, and recommended approval of the proposed variance ection 10.55 aL'Aivisior 8 and recommended approval of i conditional uoe pern,.t for the regrading of Pend A based on the following findings: A) The proposed grading will not have a significant effect on the wester quality of the watershed or on the hydraulics of the local. drainage system. B) The pond serves as a debris and silt collection basin, and this will not change as a result of the proposed grading. Th pond is part o1 a drair.-)ge .^.ystem servinct the Crystal Say ighborhood. Page 1 of 4 City of ORON'0 RESOLUTION Or THE C!TY COUNCIL NO. C) The h7i ;in area to be regraded is approximately 0.( acres in area. D) Because of to sedimentation d debris collection characteristi, _)f .a basin, protective measures are needed during the ret„ radi ng work to eliminate any effect on the downstiream watershed. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other prc-)erty in thi zoning district; that granting the variance would not advei: ly affe-'t traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve au a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to a'leviate a demonstrable hardship or difficu_ty; is necessary to Frcsc�ri►e a su►`stantial property right of the app .i- cant; and would he in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Anq Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. b. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the regrading of Pond "A" of French Creek will not br detrimental to the health, safety or general welrare of t).e p► . c, would not adversely oflect light, air nor pose a fire ha ' or other danger tcneighboring property - nor. will it ae�_ _ciate surrounding property values and t the propoLed level of use of the property will be in keepin h the intent and objectives cf the 7.oi:inv Coe.i and Comprrhers.Lve Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or mere of the above findings, the .)?ono City Council hereby _grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to allow the grading of a designated wetland retention basin, and grants a conditional use pE.rn.it for the regrading of Pond P., French Creek ,subdivision, subject to the fcllowi.nq conditions: 1. A timter ba f f le out l F t. structure :r.-ct inq ,:he approval . f the City Engi ,-iec �''a l le con,;-Iructed to e l imir..- e f l oati ng debris frorr en f�ri•,g the down ;tr-am was ersh-d. t. A si'.t fence and hay bales ;,s nc.ces.,;ary shall be �nstalled at they outlet duriiiq construction. 3. The applicant if: advised t'„t this p- c ec:t may be Subject to permit by Minn.c-haha Creek ....rershed District. ritge 2 of 4 City, of ORONO RESOLUTION OF TH.. c., ;-Y COUNCIL NO. 4. Spoil material shall be ply n high ground on the property in a location to be approve:1 b� she City ngir.«r, shall be seedt..3 to establish a vegetative cover, and biia l l be p z o'tected by silt fence and hay bales as necessary to eliminate erosion during revegetation. S. Applicant is advised that fut>>re maintenance dredging of this pond will require a new conditional use permit r.nplication and revie-,. 6. Applicant or Lis agent shall obtain a grading and excavation per.At per the current lreot schedu 1 e prior to ccmmencc.-iier* -f the work. 7. Violati,.n of or non-ccinpliance th any of the term, and condition� of this resolution shall r-L-istitute a %ri station of the zoning cc shall automatically termis.dte an} a,.;t_hority granted herein, and 5nall be punishable as a misdemennoi-. B. The undersigned applicant ha: :,-ad, unu'erstood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resulu n an(' on bc;,~' " of himself, his heirs, successors and a .signs, reh- agrees to the recc�rdi -iq of this resolution in the chair: of "it'. f F: operty. Adopt -el Uy t.i(_ Orono Cir , Coun^il o:, this 24th day of February, ' ' P6. HEST: Do_ithy M. Hallin, amity Clerk Tim Adams, Actinn M.avor Frupe: t.} Owr.ec :'n 3 f 4 City of OR,ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO, STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of _ 1986 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) desc.rib,-d in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowl 'ged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) tree act an, 'eed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )Ss. COLAlTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 1986, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared _ known to me to be the persons) described in and -who executed the foregoing instrument., and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. N(`'i'ARY-` Pt1f3LIC. MY COMMISSION RXPIRES Page 4 of 4 22086.4 �II 'Po: Mayor and City Council �r FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratof, DATE: February 20, 1986 SUBJECT: Wolsfeld Woods WU��Wd� y'vittfING FEB 2 4t 1966 CITY OF ORONO This item was received back in November of 1985, as there was no request for action, it was not brow( t before the Council. The City of Medina is aware of this Atter although it has not formally been presented to their Cour.,A 1. 1900 County Rd 6 Long Lake MN 55356 November 1, 1985 Dear Neighbor, As you probably know, Bob njupstrom of the DNR has acted to terminate our lease at Wolsfeld Woods, where we've lived for the last e1(;ven years. Enclosed you'll find a copy of a letter to Commissioner Joseph Alexander of the DNR which details the situation and asks for an impartial review. We're also sending copies of this letter to our state representative and state senator. We'd appreciate it if you have time to read the letter, and if you feel inclined, write a letter or letters of support to Mr. _Alexander, Mr. Sando, 4r. Jude, and Mr. r1Husnitzer. Mailing labels are enclosed. Many of you have already written in support of us, and we are very grateful. But it is most important now to express an opinion if ,You have one. We love our home and we love the wcx)ds. whatever happens to us, we feel lucky to have rived there. Thanks for your support. Lisa Ringer Jim llill, ,Crass Katie Rase and Anna Our phone at home m 173-0783. Jim's phone at work is 339-2521. October 21j, 1985 Mr. Joseph Alexander, Commissioner MN -Department of Natural Resources Centennial Office Building St Paul MN 551E.5 Dear Mr. Alexander, I am writing to you to request your review of action being taken by Rcbert Djupstrom, Sapervisor of Scientific and Natural Areas. Mr. Djupstrom has requested that your Land Bureau terminate an agreement under which I currently lease about two and a half ar.res at Wolsfeld Lake in western Hennepin County. (Lease #1 44 16 486). This lease was extended verbally by Mr. Djupstrom to June i2, 1986. In a rather unusual arrangement, I own and occupy +n olci FI_l;y e located or, the land. This occurred as a result of the gift of the 220 acri•s to the DNR (via the Nature Conservancy' by the Conley Brooks family in shout 1977. I had occupied the house for several years previously, and for various reasons, my family and I came with the land when the DNR received it. Among the reasons was the belief by the DNR, the Nature Conservancy, and the Brooks family that land would be better protected by having someone living on it. !See the attached ie'tter from Marney Brooks for ;+ part!al explanation.` I believe that. Mr. Djupstrom also wants to see the land protected, but that, in my opinion, he is attempting to follow the letter of the law at the expense of the spirit. I further believe that Mr. Djupstrom's openly �,.ostile attitude toward my wife and I has blinded him to the renal qut?stion at h;+nc! they protection of the land. I believe that your consideration of the matter is important for the following reasons: I. Prior to my living on the land, it was liternlly over run by snowmobilers, motorcyclists, and hunters. This may have be.rn partially a result of the land having been a public- picnic grounds for many years. Mary neighbors, including Marney Brooks and Roseanne Eppei—could verify this. 2. A chain or gate across the road will not prevent the above. In fact, the Brooks family had ;t locked g;+ta there when I first arrived--motorcylclists and four --wheel drive vehicles s imp IN •nrnve around i t . Furthermore, t by ne t tthbur, Morris Holmberg, as a legal rrp,ht. ,f wa,, through the land, ;irio wi 1 I not ;+ ! 1 (iw the- road to be c 1 use• ) . a. Marty of the violations orrur in flit- -v••nrng hours ip+lrkint;, d►+nking, dumping). I 1mve• tr10-d ,V.vf.r.al t1m1•1;, without success, to get assi-.tance at night from a Conservation Officer. They did not respond in time to assist. As a result, I've handled hundreds of problems without their help. 4. The house and farm are of significant historic value. The house is partially log, and was built in 1853. This is one of the very oldest buildings in the entire area. You can verify this by talking with Bob Gash or Avery Stubbs at the Western Hennepin County Pioneers' Association in Long Lake. 5. Termination of the lease has the effect of taking our house from us without financial compensation. Because I believe: the termination to be an unjust and arbitrary action of a single individual (Mr. Djupstrom), I intend to seek compensation. 6. There has been a significant savings to your department by h:,ving an unpaid resident caretaker on the land. It would seem that there are no compelling reasons to forego these savings. 7. The Friends of Wolsfeld Woods originally organized by your department) has gone on record favoring the retention of resident caretaker (see copy of letter). If you examine your files, I believe that you will find that the neighbors have been unanimous on the issue. Please give this matter your thoughtful consideration. I can be reached during the day at 339-2521. I would be pleased to meet with someone from your office. Tnank you for your time. incerely / �Ja es C Hillegass% / Vi cc: Robert D.jupstrom Rodney Snndo Tad Jude, State Senator Dale Clausnitzer, Sttit e Representative j' Board Members: This is a drbft of the �! ONR on November 27. I letter Steve will be sending to the Rosanne November 27, 1984 This letter is -.•ing written at the request of the member- ship of the Friends of Wolsfeld Woods. At our annual meeting this month, the memhership was distressed to learn of the Impending termination of the resident caretaker's lease. Considering the past history of numerous violations In the Woods and the years of vigilant surveillance It has taken to finally control and minimize the atuses, it is the position of the Friends that the presence of a resident caretaker is essential to the continued preservation o: the Woods. The members cited a long list of violations in past years and the resident caretaker reported that at the present time at least once a week a motorbikes, a snowmobller or a hunter is asked to leave. The membcrs are certain that without this monitoring and surveillance, the beer parties, destruction of trees, building of treehouses and log cabins, campfires, trees "decorated" with beer cans, etc., will all quickly resume. The presence of a resident caretaker has been the major force in controlling these elements. The friends of Wolsfeld Woods strongly urqe that you reconsider terminating the lease, realizing that the benefits of an on premise caretaker far outweigh any minuses --and all at no expenss to the taxpayer. 5incereIV, Steve Kelley, President, Friends of ..olsfeld Woods 1C Decer.ber 1984 Mr. Robert Djupstrom Supervisor, Scientific Vaturul Areas Minnesota Department or 21atur'il Resources box_ 6, Centennial Office Building St. P.nul, M11 55155 Lear Bob: 7 am writing to pro�est the terc.1nation of Jim Ifillegass' lease. Jii has been the resVent caretaker at Wolsfeld Woos for ten years, work- ing fDr our family's compnny Wore the land was given to The Nature Conserv�lncy anti, subsequently, to the LNR. The reason we hi. e,; Jim was that the situation iz the wuo is hni be- come intolerable after the forn:er caretaker moved. The ol�] hjuze been vmnialized, windows shot out, fixt%.res stolen. There were nur.er- ous dump sites, and the beer parties, : untiri3, snowmobiling, c«c:ping hud all escalated. Since Jim has lived there, such incidents have become irdal nl. the feel he has done a good job of overseeing find shudder to think of what might happen in the Woods in the nbeence of a resident caretaker. We, the Brooks family, the Fricnds of Wolsfeld ti;oods and surrounding neighbors feel a renl debt of gratitude to Jim inti Liss for their c•iretaking over the fe_irs. tie have felt secure in the hnowle'ge that they are sincere environmentaLlsts who truly care thrt the woods remnin undisturbed. 1 urge the H R to weigh all the pros and cons and come to the renlizs- tion that .its minor cou:plain:s are nottLing coup -ire' with the problem which will probably arise without: n rnretsker in resi.!ence. „nri, reallzin,v :,iris, what better deal coul,: you have than caretakers like Jim ar.A Liarx who love the woods and will steep them safe, ill free of charge? ank you for ; .jur cons i '.erztion. iricerely, WiRri 'Y 13. DROCLS 1C45 Spr;ng hill Roal Long L++ke, M11 55356 cc; E r. PoCer Holc:e3, Chief, oildlife "ection Minnesota i NR - Pot 7, Centenni +l Office r1 g. St. P ul, P-3 `,1c5 J� 21886.1 1.3 f EE 2 119386 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: dark Bernhardson, City Administrato DATE: February 18, 1986 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Appointment After consideration, Mr. S i m e has decided not to seek reappointment to the P':::ning commission following expiration of his term in December, 1985. At this point it is recommended that the Co-incil appoint one of the three candidates interviewed at the Council meeting January 27, 1986, together with any decision on alternates. Maureen Bellows, Architect Carol Moore Trapp, Attorney ,Tim Hansen, Developer (real estate, software) Staff continues to recommend the ordinance amendment for availability of alternates to allow the regular members a little flexibility. PROPOSFD MOTI9N - `loved by , seconded by that be appointed as a member of the Orono Planning Commission."Ayes, "Jays INTEROFFICE MEMO DATE: February 7, 1986 TO: Mark Bernhardson, Citv Administrator FROM: Mel Kilbo, Chief of Police v���•��L�f�v SUBJECT: Siren FEB 2.1 1926 CITY OF MORG In budget preparation for 1986, I budgeted for a Siren amplifier and speaker for $400.00. I believed I hid a light bar- assembly to use on a car. I found out several days ago this last light bar, purchased 14 years ago, was now in pieces, parts being used to repair the existing light bars. I have a quote for ,;iren, speaker and light bar for 5794.95 from Don Strei Cher Guns, dated 2/3/86. I do have money in capital outlay to cover purchase as squad car bills come in slightly lower.. budgeted for three cars, $36,600, low bid came in at $34,995, a difference of $1.705.^0. I request perriiss ion 4.o purchase light bar, siren and speake-s for -�799.95. TO: Mciyur and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator 1\). Forwarded recommending approval. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by __, that the Council approve the Police Department purchase of light bar, siren and speakers in the amount of $799.95. Ayes Nays __ DUN STREIGHER GUNS Professional Police Equipment Distributors _ P.O BOx 41398 _ PO BOX :- �344 rr 10�911 WEST H16HWAY E,5 2465SOUTH84)HS1REET L MINNEAPOt IS, MN 5544. Mil WAUKEE, WI 53227 16121546-1155 0 141541.4164 TO Orono Police Deaprtment CHIEF MEL KILBO P. O. Box 86 Orono, Minnesota 55323 WE ARE PLEASED TO QUOTE AS FOLLOWS Q- 22110 TOLL FREE ORDER LIVES 1.800.752.4249 MIN NESOTA 1.800.328-4815 OTHER YOUR INGUiRY LST. SHIPPING GALE TERMS f.U.B. phone 10 Days AR Net 15 Days Shippinq Pt. DATE 02/03/86 1 each: P.S.E., FORCE-4LP LIGHT BAR ASSEMBLY ................ Basic 06200A Light Bar w/Stainless Steel Speaker Ho sing Includirg: Jual "Sting Ray" Option Dual "Take -Down" Lights Front Internal Alley Lights (2 per end) 1 each: I P.S.E., Siren Amplifier & Light Control Center ...... Full Function Siren with Air He--, Light Control includes: 4-Pos .-)n Slide Switch for Light Bar Contr Push-B,,,.ton Switches for alleys & take -down 1 each: High Power Speaker Assembly, 100 Watt ............... I Hennepin County Bid Price i is: $861.30.......... OUR BID PRICE I.j:...... $799.95 Optional. Noise Cancelling Microphone for ­eparat� public address from your radio system...;....... 1 I i 1 i i $40.CC' i ABOVE PAK:.FS ARE VALID FOR _ 30 GAYS ORIGINAL s,Evvwn Jvnnigvs, rrva. 21886.6 TO: mayor an,l City Council FROM: 'Mark Bernhardson, City Administratoclt (' DATE: February 18, 1986 SUBJECT: City or Orono Water Supply Rating erjuriptol f EB 2:1 1'D36 CITY Oil: �"IRM Attached please fin.i the City's evaluation for its water system this is done on an annual basis. It should be noted that over the past five years the City has increased its rating from 95 to 98. The 98 represen;:s being one point off from the perfect expected score of 99. We have reviewed the recommendations and feel that the one regarding training can be appropriately acr•ommodateci. The other recommen-lat ion on the chlorine however, is met by only a few of the larger communities in the metro area and would he rather expensive to implement. We would like to commend the individuals in the Utility D-partment together with Public Works Coordinator, John :erhai lson for the efforts that they have made in achieving this exePllent record. nROPOSFD MOTION - Moved by _ , seconded by to commend the utility Department and Public Works Coordinator, John Gerhardson for their excel lint efforts in improving the witor supply rating f�)r the community. Ayes , Nays minnesota department of health 717 s.e delaware 51. p.o. box 9441 minnbapolis 5A40 K Oron- � C i t.y CounL i 1 c/o Ms. Dorothy M. Hallin, Clerk Box 66 Crystai Ray, Minnesota 55323 Dear Council t*mbers: We are enclosir; a copy of the report cf our district office covering an investigation of your municipal water supply. if you have any questions concerning the information contained in this report, please contact Mr. Davi,f B. Engstrom, P.E., Public Health Engineer, at 612/623-5361. :sincerely _yours, Gary L. Englund, P.E., Chief Section of Water Supply and Engineering EnO w o Cts Millim Carlsoy. Wour Suet. aw e4" tty ~0", MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH REPORT ON INVESTIGATION OF PUB( IC WATER SUPPLY Name of Water Supply PWS IU Number Orono Municipal Water Supply _ _— 1270041 Street Telephone Numbers City Hall, Box 66 - CttV state Z,p Code City —_ . Orono--,--- 1 55323 1 Operator County — -- ---- — — District _MN Engineer" --- --- Hennepin - Tool itan — other. AU-9180 (Onr_I Water Superintendent Clean,,. Plant Classification Owner Type William Carlson B C ---- _Municipal �— --- Other Operators classification Plant Type Plumbing Permits and rn- td ❑ Communit Inspections Required Yes »a Jerome Sm i t t 1 C Date of Previous survey Date of Survey — Wayne Quast C City Engineer --------�— Bonestroo, Rosene and And,rlik Glen Cook SERVICE AREA CHARACTERISTICS I�Munre.;pel ❑ School or College ❑ Mon +le Hone Park ❑ Hotel/Motel ❑ Company Town ❑ Resot t ❑ Institution Restaurant Population Served Service Connections 2,150 700 ❑ Recreation Area ❑ Campground ❑ Housing Develuswnent ❑ Other — Storage capecity7 (1-tst Separately) ------- -- - - 200,000 gallon elevated Design Capacity Ipal/day) Averege Daily Production (gel/day) — _ 1,800,000 183,830 Emergency Capacity (pWMey) Highest Daily Production (gal!day ) � —_ 0 397,000 — " j ITotal, 200,000 gallons TREATMENT I WELL DATA C c o C o C Y o ' O C C C S i c Source Name J vl tii NZ a V O Well 1 G P c ks F1 Wel1 2 G P c ks I F1 Nt I I I V is 0 cto C C C0 C • V V � > U to 3 in 5 a' 19711 12 315 11 385 Jorddn5 65 145 H 1911 8 380 10 390 Jo 8 60 21 David E91Strom S. bV Appfovedhy Richard Clark Orono Municipal Water Supply Recommendations: August 1, 1985 1. A free chlorine residual of at least 0.2 or a combined chlorine residual of at least .0 milligram per liter should be maintained on all points of the distribution system. 2. The opportunity for additional training in water supply work should be made available to the operator(s). Attendance at the annual water- works operators seminar, held in the area, is a valuable experience for anyone engaged in this field. David B. Engstrom, P.E. Public Health Engineer Environmental Feld Services Approved: Richard D. Clark, P.E., Supervisor Engineering Unit Section of Water Supply and Engineering MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Section of Water Supply and General Engineering Sanitation Safety Rating of i.e.— 11tim4e4pli ---- _ _Nater Supply Date__ 61Tab — - hrloet Score As _ iwad As Recommended See Necommetwatlon No. In Attacbed Report (A) Source j Sanitary Safety 20 Adequacy of treatment i 20 20 Bacteriological Quality) 10 Physical quality 2 lU 10 ! Chemical quality 4 4 2 Biological quality 2 4 Adequacy of quantity 2 ? .._......2 �......... _....2_.._.__.. .. Sub -total 40 _ Nanard adjustment factor deducted 0 — —, Total 40--- --.-- — (B) Prime Novin2 Equipment Well or intake g i Pumps 7 Piping arrangement 5 7 Reservoire 7 5 !. 5 Equipment housing 3 w._.._...... __......_ -_._.. �.__._.... _Sub -total. .__. t}..... _. 3....._.. ----_.._ Renard adjustment factor deducted 0 Total -------- ---- - ---r� —+- 30----- ju _ _.------- a -- -- --- _J (C) Distribution System ! I Street trains 5 5 5 Building services 2 j 1,5 1.5 Plumbing 3 2.5 2.5 iiydrants 1 Storage 4 11 ! 1 Pressure 4 Tap water quality _._.. __..._....-.--•---•--....••--•----.....-.........--•._........_........._..__...-....._...3......._.. 3 2 I 2 cub -total 20 Ranard adjustmant factor deducted 0 I Total 0 (D) operation and Operators i Control of system 3 2 3 I 1 Condition of system 2 2 Operator qualifications 5 ........... r ....... 5. 2 - ...... Renard adjustment taotor deduct" _ .4 TOta1 HAND TOTAL ANO RATING 0 3Qy_^ . 100 __.._ t - -- I -- r. t)n and wMard - high 4ogrep or snretY: WatrhtLl matnt~ncr tw>eded. 4% to M11 - moderately high degroa or aaraty. Correction and malntenanra program ronttnuod. 710 t-« 94 poor to dangerous condt t t on. Prrnsnt ew.rreettve ae t tnn ur;ent 1 y rw odsd. '.A and Irwer - very dangerous rnodltton. Hmaritenry measures rweessary. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF 111,,AL'I'11 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTA1, HEALTH ANALYTICAL DATA Saw,pl es Collected By 1 2ye Era; -u- Report To Field Number 'town, County, Etc Sampling Point and Source of Sample " Dill Coult S.•r. " " 1l,at^r Biolc i ,1 In�t� u '�45C0 Cir;:Iz. .T. his line for lab use only. ample NumberENINIMMIMMOMMMUM a { 1 _' �..;! r ? ; :3'iUj f. _ f Date Collected, Time Collected r•• D 7. a ived by Lab cc. M.P.N.1/100 MI. r rc Con. Com . organisms M.F.C:./100mL _} ArE..onic 1 Barium Cadmium 1 ChromiuR, 1 Fluoride m 1 i Lead u /t Mercury Nitrate Nitrogen m I V Residual Chlorine,,,. -,,- _ Selenium; 1 Silver 1 Sodium MR/1 _ _..____ ___. Cross Alpha r Radium Al hs - - Uranium Alpha --•------• Radium-228 Ft-00443•02 INTEROFFICE MEMO DATE : Feb ru..: r 1 2 , 19 86 TO: Mirk Bernhardson, City Administrator FROM: Mel Kilbo, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Carpet for Squad Room F-EB 2:1 1986 We r,q uest to carpet the squad room. We had budqeted over $1000.00 for carpet in the 1986 budget for that purpose. Last fall, we recieved a quote of $719.00 for carpet and pad, and y75 '-o ;nove furniture, subject to change after 30 days. Today we received a quote from the same company with a pr. ce change of $663.63 plus $75 to move furniture. Th-.s is a decrease of $52.37. Because the carnet conr)anv recoi: :fended the carpet be clued to the floor, there is no pad. This would reduce the wear on the carpet. We request permission to proceed. TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardsan, City AdministratulVi� Forwarded reconunending approval. While we indicated we would not go ahead with any building and capital improvements until presentation of the facilities assessment which will be presented March 24th, this purchase is reconuner.ded to correct a problem of the current carpet which presently is in shreds. PROPOSED MOTION -- Moved by seconded by that the Council release budgeted monies for replacement of the carpet in the Police Department. Ayes _ Nays 21886.7 FEE 2 1 1S66 TO: Mayor and City Council ����� 1 of: FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato$ i DATE: Fehruar;, 18, 1986 SUBJF..CT: C.D.B.G. Sewer Assessment irant Program As of the deadline for submission we had 10 people apply for the assessment grant program, the same individuals that applied for the connection grant program. Although interest was expressed by others in the community, they either did not qualify or did not return the appropriate applications in a timely manre_r. We originally had approximately $27,984 set aside for this program. If all ten assessments were paid off it would take a total. of 5,92,350. This can be accomplished through total allocation of the $18,639 that will become available to the City in August un•ler C.D.B.G. together with having the application for $45,677 to the County out of their discretionary account. A part of this was the $25,1.37 that the Cit% turned back as unused as part of the 1985 connection grant program. Should the City not he ahle to totally fund all of these items we would recommend that funding as man, as we coul,i and of the three seniors that qualified, that they remain on the senior citizens deferral progran. Attached please find the application letter that was sent to the County which had a February 7 deadline. Should you have further questions, please feel free to contact is. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the Council accept the information aT approve the City's request far discretionary monies from the County to help fund the sewer assessment grant program. Ayes _ Nays CITY of ORONO Post Wfice Box 660Cryatal Bay, Minnesota 55,=*Municipal Offices On ih- North Shore of Lake Minnetonka Fellruary 14, 1986 Hennepin County Planning & Development A-2308 Government Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 Attention: Larry Blackstad Senior Plarner Dear Larry, in 1985 the City of Orono constructed sj� t.ary sewer lines in the Crystal Bay area. The Crystal Bay area Jenerally consists of older homes on small lots i•o longer able to support an on -site septic system. The City so d General Obligation bonds to fund the project and assesse(-. the cost of the project to the henefiting property owners. It has been determined t.',at ten of the Crystal Bay residents qualify for funding under tte low to moderate income levels as per the Section 8 Income cjidelines set forth by HUD. The issessed amount to each of the ten qualifying residents is 9,235. If the ten qual .ying residents cannot. receive assistance the financial hard hip may result in th•? loss of their homes. Currently the C. f ha $27,984 of Year XI Community Development Block Grant mo ios to assist in haying off the assessments. In December 1965 the City returned $25,137.00 of Year IX Block Grant Funds to the Discretionary Account. The City also plans to allocate all of the YeaL XI monies $18,689 that will be available in August of 1986 to help pay off the assessments. !Inwever, allocating all of Year h1 and Year XII Block Grant monies will not amount to adequate funding for the ten qualifying residents. Therefore, we are requesting $45,677.90 from the Discretionary Account. cereIII Mar Aer dson ` City Administrator 1"'" INN(,! I4041WO, - 47.1 7JS7 0 ADMINISTM ATION & FINA%('F 473 7398 0 14 el h %4ORKS 411 7 1C 9 21886.8 '1F TO: Mayor and City Council r`B '2 1 06 FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator L.ITY OF � , V DATE: February 18, 1986 SUBJECT: Letter of Authority/Acting Administrator Attached is a Letter of Authority for John Gerhardson to act in my absence and outlines the authority he is granted under that. The Administrative and Personnel Policy requires the Council to act on this Utter of Authority to either ;,;nend or modify. It is requested that you approve this Letter Authority as outlined. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the City Council approve the Letter of Authority for John Cerhardson to act as the 4dministrator in the absence of Mark Bernhardson under the provisions outlined in the attached letter. Ayes _,, Nays 21986.3 TO: John Gerhardson, Puhlic Works Coordinator FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: February 19, 1986 SUBJECT: .Appointment of Acting Administrator In accordance with the Administrative and Personnel Policy of the City of Orono, I hereby appoint you as the Acting Administrator, to act in my b-half in my absence due to vacation, sick leave or City business that takes me out of the area. This will be operable any time that I will be absent for a working day or am out of town. Responsihilities that you would be assuming under this letter of authority are as follows: OPERATIONS - Insure that the continued City operations or-aTI de continue. You have the authority to work with Department Heads to make appropriate operational decisions and insure continunity of operations. REPRESENTATIVE AT MEETINGS - Attend meetings that �equ i re my� at tenc�arire and act on my behalf in those meetings including, but no: limited to, regular weekly staff meetings, one on one Department dead meetings and Council meetings. POLICY DIRECTION - Work with Councilmembers to develop needed policy direction in which a conclusion is to be reacheO in a timely manner during my absence. SIGNATURES - Pursuant to authority granted by the City Z`ounciT that in my absence you have the authority to sign documents that require my action or signature together with signature of appropriate checks, provided that the other required signatures are provided. OE_NERAL - That you pf-�rform other , anr_t ions and tasks in my sence that will insure the ongoing operation of thr organization within established yuidelines, but apart from a case by case authority, defer significant personnel actions or altQration of comrensation. DURATION - This letter can he amendpd, modified or revoknd-at. any time by either myself or the City Counci 1 upon appropriate written notice delivered to your Mark F. nern son City Administrator 1 DATE: February 11, 1986 a � 4. TO: Mark Bernhardson, Citv Administrator FROM: Mel Kilbo, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Request for Public Auction According to ordinance No. 178, I request Permission to sell. at public auction the below listed items on ?larch 29, 1986 at 10:00 a.m. located at Martins 66, County Roads 15 and 19 in Navarre. 1 1971 Ford Truck 1 1Q73 A11C 4 dr. 1 1968 VW 2 dr. fastback 1 1973 %IT•' reetl,- 1 i9F9 11+or.c 2 dr. 1 1980 Pontiac 2 dr. 1 1977 Plvmouth 2 dr. 1 1979 Pontiac TA 1 1971 Olds 2 'r. 1 198n Penault LeCar 1 1974 VV Beetle 1 1974 Olds 2 dr 1 1980 Honda 1 1975 Olds 98 TO: Mayor and City Council ty FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Adrnir,istrator ' Forwarded recorrmtendinq approval. Expenses for the auction will be paid out of the proceeds, as will the outstandin- bills for towing and storage with Martin's 66. ;.ny proceeds over those expenses will qo to the General Fund. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by __ , seconded by that the Council approve the sale of the above listed vehicles at public auction (.)n March 29, 11)86. Ayes , Nays 21886.9 i;*ov ,o, i ► t .c- riNs FHB 21 13`66 CITY OF iNI40 TO: Mayer and City Council Il FROM: "lark Bernhardson, City Administratorw�� DATE:: February 18, 1986 SUBJECT: Sewer Connections - Charles VanEeckhout Attachel please find letters frc)m Mr. VanEeckhout requestincj sew,-r connection through Long Lake for: property he has that ahutts 'both the City of Long Lake and the actual lake. The letter we felt is in tune with the direction that Council has given staff in the most recent rejection of Teff Stebbins' request for hookup to the Long Lake sewer. in a suhsequent conversation with Mr. VanEeckhout he indicated that he felt the City's policy should be revised and that it should allow for properties in Orono to hook to sewer when sewer represented the best means to service the -,•anitary needs for a property. It was outlined to him in that con •ersation that if he felt a policy change should be made, he should address a letter to the 114ayor outlining his concerns. Additionally it was indicated to him that there would be a possible issue in over all sewer capacity as it relates to that area and that he should become aware and involved in the Highway 12 corrir' study. Shou19 you hav(� any questions or commolits, please feel free to contact me. PROPOSI:D !IOTInN - Moved by , seconded by __, City Council accept the information regarA ng tho request for sewer from Mr. ,harles Vanrerkhout. Ayes Plays (CITYof ORO NO Post O fict :Sox (Ai•Crystal Flay. M(nn"ota ;).xM•Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lakr Minnetonka February 10, 198r, C.E. Van Eeckhout Van Eeckhout Building Corporation 1935 West Wayzata Blvd., Suite #165 Long Lake, MN 55356 Re: P.I.D. 34-118-23 12 0004 Dear Mr. Van Eeckhout: The following is in response to your letter of 2/6/86 requesting a residential sewer connection to an adjacent Long Lake lin-2 for proposed residence at the property referenced above. The City of Orono has limited sewer capacity. Future units have been reserved for properties already assessed within an existing service area. We are currently involved in a Comprehensive Planning Study of the Highway 12 Corridor within the City of Orono. That study will determine: how these units will be assigned based on existing ani proposed new uses. Your property is not included in that study zone and continues to be classfied as a rural property to be developed per Orono rural standards including on -.site septic systems. The current files have no information on septic testing completed for the subject property. If tests reveal that your property is unable to su►:stain an on -site septic system, thy-, Ci..y may consider your request for municipal sewer. Your 1':!tter advises that you received approval for 16 sewer connections from Long Lake for your townhouse project on the adjacent property also noting that there is adequate capacity in the line. Based on formal agreements executed in 1981 between the Cities of Orono and Lonq Lake, any connection for an Oron^ property would be credited against the City of Orono. The City of 0• -)o is not in a position to consider any special requests for sewer connections until the planning study is completed in May or June. Should you have further questions or cop -tents, please feel free to contact me. _ r.. r. �l, r �' l --- k F' fie�Claon ,� Cit t, Administrator ltltilNV(.�/t►if�t, 1`!'IS' • AI�NIti111R�11/J�•It�AVt! 1'1'Isp • I1111N MrtR111 "1-'ibY A�1! ♦�1tit. VAN EECKHOUT BUILDING CORPORATION 1935 WEST WAYZATA BLVO., SUITE it165 • LANs LAKE, MINNESOTA 55356 (612);473-157 'Q February 6, 1986 Mr. Mark Bernhardson City of Orono P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN. 55323 Dear Mr. Bernhardson: I presently own a three -plus acre residentiL' building site in Orono adjacent to Long Lake. As part of an adjacent tuwnhouse fro„,?ct, I installed a lateral sewer line that terminates a few `eat from the Orono boundry. -this line has surplus capacity since I received approval to build sixteen townhouses and have scaled the project back to twelve units. I am proposin; to build one single family home on the Orono site a-H would like to hook up to )e exising sanitary sewer. It seems like r logical solution to the sewage problem in this case, since this is a lake lot and c^ntral sewer is preferred, from a pollution point of view and there is adequate capacity available. Shouid this request require City Council consideration, I would like to be notified of the meeting date. Sincerely, C. E. Van Feckhout President "T il.4a Encl. !�' •r„.•►SEG. �27, T "118; R. 23' o b i j • • �ti .� •� t .... Rob/. C JWVPA6 N Go JL r. ' , . w• `!'iPi; ' 3 f:,W� "llool Dm.rd LAIM ply,, u Qa/rr� d • __._.... ,� Veil ''�,..��r...^u =fro 1 _, ..�� . r i'--lil,�.� � \ / '�V'•► ♦ /♦ ,v � n • , • y • • r : \• IPA • . s MAP w , ' • �' Derr • 0�.2'" ;�- � , 6 "� l� •,,►-• ' ~ ��,•.�4b� • . fe 4-1 CF)U11 ".Ii. r.!1-:F- fIHG CYB 2 -- 6 TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator FROM: Dorothy tlallin, City Clerk DATE: February 14, 1986 SUBJECT: 13enior Citizen's Deferral - Reapplications from 80-1 Project The following residents have applied for renewal of Senior Citizen Deferral of special assessments on their prcroerty. They are both in the 80-1 sewer project. Basil M. Young, 1225 Dickenson Stree': Mr. Young is a resident of the Minr,,-�tonk� ;tuffs area of this sewer project. He is single and qualifies under the income and asset guideline::. Henry M. Skarp, 1045 West Ferndale Road Mr. Skarp is a resident of the West Ferndale area of this sewer project. He is single and qualifies under the income and asset guidelines. Attached is a Resolution for each applicant and copies of Resolutions #1093 and 1779. TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Fk:rmhardson, City Administratoz , Forwarded recurimending approv,il. PROPOSED MOTION -- Moved by seconded by __, that the Council adopt Resolution Numbers _, and _ establishinq deferrals for those named within each cf' the resolut.i.ons. ayes __. , Nuys RESOLUTION #1093 A RUSOLU:'IOM RELATING TO DEFERMMIT of SPECIAL ASSESSImiTS POR PERSO'.4S 65 YLARS Or AGr. OR OLDER 11HERr.AS, the City Council of the City of Orono is the official governing body of the City of Orono; and WHEREAS, M.S.A. Section 435.193 through Section 435.195 authorizes the City of Orono, upon proper application, to defer the payment of special assessments against any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older on January 1 of the payment year and for whom it would be a hardship to make the ,►ay- ments; and 19111.MAS, Section 435.194 authorizes the municipality to establish an interest rate to be added] to the deferred assessment which shall be payable in addition to the deferred assessment; and WHER1'AS, the City Council has determined that the de- ferral of assessments should be granted to any person otherwise qualified who makes proper application to the City of Orono on forms ;prescribed by the County Assessor of Hennel.in County and by the Orono City Council and for whom the City Co.incil determines that it would be a hardship to make the payments, based upon the following criteria: 1. It is presumed to be a hardship if the applicant is single and has a total annual gr income of $8,000 or less and total assets, includ- ing non -homestead real property, of $15,000 or less. 2. It is presumed to be a hardship if the applicant is married and together with hi, spouse, has a total annual gross income of 512,O00 or I►rsc: all �ot.il assets, includlnq non -hoc ,1.f• ,toad rr_'a1 (�rU- of $22,000 or less. 3. If the applicant does not `all within one of the above criteria, the City Council shall, in its discretion, determine hardship based upon the applicant's income, assets and expenses. U01.4, T11CREFORE, BE IT nCSOLVED BY THE CITY COWICI I. OF THE. CITY of OROUo III REGULAR Iff—'LTI IG /� -SEABLCD, that a .se_ ssment s against any homestead property owned by a person G5 .,car:. of age or older and for whop it would be a hardship to :sake the paynents, be deferred for a ,period of time not to exceed `ive years, subject to the aforementioned financial criteria, upon submission of an ar•,. apriate application signed by the qual if ied person; and HE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that interest at the rate for that particular assessment shall be added to the deferred assess- vent and shall be payable in accordance with the terms and pro- visions of H.S.A. Section 435.195; and BE IT FURTHER I'.CSOLVLD, that the right of defern,?nt is automatically terminated under Section 435.195 if: 1. The owner di^s and the spouse is riot otherwise eli;ible; 2. Vie property or any part thereo` is sold, transferred or subdivided: 3. The property should lose its hor.iestead status; or 4. 1: for any reason the City determines that there would be no hardship to require innediatr or partial payment. Adopted by the City Coined of the City of Orono, Minnesota at reqular meeting held Novvmner. 13, 1979. to 1 , ais B. 'Jan Nest, Mayor Attest: Walter Henson, City Acu;inistrator 0 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE PROGRAM FOR DEFERMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PERSONS G5 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono is the official governing body of the City of Orono; and WHEREAS, M.S.A. Section 435.193 through Section 435.195 author i:�es the City of Orono, upon proper application, to defer the payment of special assessments against any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older on January 1 of the payment year and for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments; and WHEREAS, Section 43").194 authorized the municipality to establish an interest rate to be added to the deferred assessment which shall be payable in a(-3ition to the deferred assessment; and that Orono had idol ted s ich a program under Ordinance 2.62 (1984 recodifiel) and Resolut on 1093 (dated `.ovember 13, 1979) and WHEREAS, the City ouncil has determined that the deferral of assessments should jE, granted to any person otherwise qualified who makes proper applicatior to the City of Orono on forms prescribed by the Countli Assessor of Hennepin County and by the Orono City Council and f�.,r whom the City Council determines that it would be a hardship to make the payments, based upon they following criteria: Numbor of F' a imum Persons in Household Income 1 $11,500.00 2 13,100.00 3 14,750.00 4 1.6,400.00 5 17,700.00 6 19,000.00 7 20,350.00 8 21,650.00 Assets not including homesteaded property of *25,000, income and asset-s as defined in Fennepin County's utility Connection Program. page 1 of 2 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. I-------�__ NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORONO IN REGULAR MEETING ASSEMBLED, that the assessments against any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older and for whom it would be a hardship to make the. payments, be deferred for a period of time not to exceed five years subject to the aforementioned financial criteria, upon submission of an appropriate application signed by the qualified person, and which may upon expiration of initial or any subsequent renewal deferments maybe reapplied for, and subject to the applicant meeting all the necessary criteria upon reapplication be deferred `_or an additional period not to exceed 5 years; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the right of deferment is automatically terminated under Section 435.195 if: 1. The owner dies and the spouse is not otherwise eligible; 2. The property or any part thereof is sold, transferred or subdivided; 3. The property should lose its homestead status; or 4. If for any reason the City determines that there would be no hardship to require immediate or partial payment. Adapted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a rL9,ilar meeting held .Lune 0, :985. To rahm, cting Mayor ATTEST or� I ihy, 17 n, lty Clerk F3cjr 2 0f 2 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOIXTION APPROVING A REAPPLICATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DEFERMENT FOR BASIL M. YOUNG WHEREAS, the City Council has ordered a local improvement project known as LS1980-1 Sanitary Sewer for which special assessments have been levied against the benefited properties; anal WHEREAS, the City Council har. adopted Resolution Numbers 1093 and 1779 establishing a policy and procedure for deferring such spacial assessments for persons 65 years of age or older who have limited income and assets and for wham payment of such special assessment would constitute a financial. hardship; and WHEREAS, Basil M. Yound has made reapplication for deferment of the above noted special assessment pursuant to the provisions of Resolution Numbers 1093 and 1779, the original deferment was approved by the City Council January 12, 1981. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of. Orono hereby finds that the applicant has demonstrated a hardship consistent with the provisions of Resolution No. 1093 and 1?79, and hereby orders deferral of the payment for the levied special assessments as follows: APPLICANT: Basil M. Young ADDRESS: 1225 Dickenson Street LEVY NO.- P.I.N.S. 7999 02-117-23 31 0148 LEVIED AMOUNT AMOUNT DEFERRED $b,700.00 $6,700.00 Deferral of payments for principal and interest shall be for a period of time not to exceed five (5) years with the first payment of principal and interest duce in collection year 1999. Interest. at the rate of 9 1,'2i annum shall be added to the deferred assessment. Deferred principal and interest shall be payable at the time of the first payment Aue in collection year 1990. Thy+ remainder of the principal and interest shall thereafter he p.ayahle in ar•rotdanco with tho adopted a::sessment. roll. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _-- This right of deferment is automatically terminated in collection 1990 or upon the occurrence of any one or more of the following conditions, whichever may occur first: 1. The owner dies and the spouse is not otherwise eligible. 2. The property or any mart thereof is sold, transferred, or subdivided; 3. The property should lose its homestead status; or 4. If for any reason the City determines that there wo,ild be no hardship to require immediate or partial payment. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota on the 24th day of February, 1986. —_------_-- __.-r----_-- Tim Adams, Acting Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M.—Nallin, City Clerk --'� If the appl icant wishes to reapply at the end of this five (5) year deferment the applicant must reapply to the City of Orono for deferment of special as;-esaments in October 1989, to keep the assessment from being included with th« real estate tax due -)nd payable in 1.999. Etas I 1 M. Young bate Cite of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL A RESOLUTION APPROVING A REAPPLICA^ ,y OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DEFERMENT FOR HENRY M. SKARP WHEREAS, the City Council has ordered a local improvement project known as LS1980-1 Sanitary Sewer for which special assessments have been levied against the benefited properties; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Resolution Numbers 1093 and 1779 establishing a policy and procedure for deferring such special assessments for persons 55 years of age or older who have limited income and assets and for whom payment of such special, assessment would constitute a financial hardship; and WHEREAS, Henry M. Skarp has made reapplication for -leferment of the above noted special assessment pursuant to the previsions of Resolution Numbers 1393 and 1779, the original r?eferment was approved by the City Council on October 14, 1980, and arivn:ied on November led, 1980, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby finds that the applicant has emonstrated a hardship consistent with the provisions of Resolution Numbers 1.093 and 1779, and ~hereby orders deferral of the payment for the levied special assessments as follows: APPLICANT: Henry M. Skarp ADDRESS: 1045 West :'erndale Road LEVY Nr`. P.I.N.S. LEVIED AMOUNT AMOUNT DEFERRED "91 02-117-21 43 0024 $8,831.40 $8,931.40 Deforral of payments for principal. and interest shall be for a p(�riod of time not to exc-od five (5) years with the first payment of principal and interest due in collection year 1990. Interest at the rate of 9 1/2 annum shall be added to the :ieferred assessment. Deferred principal and interest shall he p3y3►,1,- at the time of the first payment due in collection yr,ar 1990. The remainder of the principal and intorest shall theroafter be p3yahle in a(—cordanco, with the adopted asr:k�ssm-nt ro l I . City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. This right of deferment is automatically terminated in collection year 1990 or upon the occurrence of any one or more of the following conditions, whichever may occur first: 1. The owner dies and the spouse is not otherwise eligible. 2. The pros, rty or any part thereof is sold, transferred or subdivided; 3. The prorerty should lose its homestead status; or 4. If for any reason the City determines that there would be no hardship to require immediate or partial paymont. Adopte y the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota on the 1t,i day of February, 1986. Tim A ams, Acting Mayor ATTEST: _'arothy M. tlall'in, Clty CTer-ic If the applicant . ei; to reapply at the end of this five (5) year defe. Pot the ippl icant must reapply to the City of Orono for deferment of special assessments in October 1989, to keep the assessment from uPing in^ludPd with the meal estate tax due and payable in 1990. !'.�nry M. 5karp -- [date 47%TING TO: Mayor Butler f a� Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator 2 '1"�6 Orono Council Members M014: Thomas J. Jacobs, Building Official MTE: February 20, 1986 SUW : Amendment of 1986 Fee Schedule The proposed amendment involves 2 sections of the fee schedule. The b ilding permit section is amended because of a need to establ,,%-n a uniform standard for building valuations within the City of Orono. The building valuation determines the building permit The valuation standard will provide staff the necessar;- lasis for evaluating estimated constructi-)n valuations on buildi—y permi� applications. The sign section has been amended requiring a fee for temporary "No Parking" eigrs issued by the City. The fee will cover staff time and printloy costs. OFFILIAL SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 17, SECOND SERIES The following is new language added to Ordinance Number 17, Second Series: CONSTRUCTION PFRMITS AND 4SPECTION FEES Building Permit Building Valuation Standard (Per Current I.C.B.O. Building Standards/ Building Valuation Data) SIGNS nemporary "No Parking" Signs $1.00 L= . A printed copy of ordinance is availa.,le for inspection by any person at the office of t ty Clerk. Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of February, 1986 by a vote of Ayes and Nays. Tim Adams, Actinq Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk 22086.3 TO: '4aynr and City CouncA. . t 1 ') , r� 1 f �.f�. " � 1:, , FROM: ?lark Bernhardson, City Administrato \/1`) DATE: February 20, lg36 SUBJECT: Administrator's Information T,AKF MINNrTOIJKA ACCESS - As you may be aware the issue regardina tie access is cr,mi—_ng to a head, the Metro Council Task Ford: beginning to draft their recommendations. In a meeting last week it was brought to light, quite strongly, that the D.N.R. was going forward with the King's Point access regardless of ghat the Metro Council recommendation might bP. It shou'.d be noted that the Metro Council has preliminarily indicated that they felt King's Point may not be a good site for public access. It was interesting to note that D.N.R. did deny a dredging permit in ,)rder to allow private development on a site that they eventually bought out on King's Point and there might be some question as to possible propriety of that action. Staff mill stay abreast of developments and keen you apprised of Metro Counci 1's recommendations and any thing that may be done legislatively to impact D.N.R.'s pr,)gress on King's Point. POLIC" SCNEDULINC - As you :na_ be aware the long standing Police e d u a was aItere-1 beginning in February which placed al 1 1-he officers on a fixed two days of the week off. Effective the f irst r)f April we have developed a schedules so that they will have a 4 Alay weekend every 4 weeks which is more frequent than the full 3 day weekend every 5 weeks they had under the old schedule. They are not necessarily fully happy with the change, however, we are currently negotiating regar:ling its effect- and these may ameliorate their concerns. 'lIG ISLAND VETERAN'S CAMP - As you will recall in letters to t' c � '-is—Tangy Board ov r.nor s in both December and January we inrlicate:l to them that we woul-i be i"itiating hazardous bu: tdings proceedings in March if we slid not receive a plan from them recyarling proposed demolition that was acceptable to the City. A-lAitionally we indicated to them that in order to operate the -amp or to anything that required over -night stay, they would need to obtain the 4ppropr iate, conditional use permit. We had indicate1 that they shoulA got a derision from the Council as to the (-ircumstances under which they will. be allowed to operate the ramp, if at a I I , before they embark on a great expenditure of time► an,l effort to attompt to bring it int- what they think the (7nur.cil may like. In a t(,Iephone conversat n with Joe Backus, who is the-kppointel representative of the ?lig Island Hoard of ;overn-rs, 1--io hat r, Ce(3 1 '^t+ 1 tn.;h they be able to ;J1.scu:i:i thf• whole issue of thf� �-amp, t bazar inus building proceedings an the C-)urciI's long standing direction to st it:t that it is most appropriate that that property be operated as' a public park. We requested they write a letter expressing their concerns and that we would put them on the March 10, 1986, agenda at the same time that the hazardous buildings proceedings were reviewed. Depending on when that letter comes and the length of the agenda that will be developed for March loth we may delay that i itil your ''March 24th meeting. It should be noted that Big Island Board of Governors had difficulty initially in receiving the title until approximately November of 1985, together vith receiving the money from the State, which they can receive any time, they are willing to sign a waiver of indemnification with the Slate. The City has however, been holding the hazardous buildings proceedings in abeyance because of their request to resolve some of their issues and in the hopes of allowing them time to develop a plan for either rehabing th,. existing structures or tearing them down. They have not to date however, developed a plan despite the fact that they received a report from their architects on possihle directions they could take back in November. Staff does feel it is now appropriate to go ahead with he proceedings in order to address the issue of hazardous structures during the next 6 months. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. 1986 CORPORATE WORK Pi,AN - Attached is staff's developed work P fan for 1986. Should you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact mt�. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TASK FORCE ON LAKE MINNETONF.A Wednesday, February 12, 1986 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. Council Chambers AGENDA 1. Call to order Pat Scully 2. Approval of agenda 3. Reports/Position Statement, King's Point Boat Launch Site a. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources b. City of M.innetrista C. Task Fc^ce Discussion 4. Status of Research o Task force review and accept draft report Charlie Smith la,ng.-uage and recommendations on the issue 5. Intergovernmental Coordination, the ,jles and Responsibilities of Involved Agencies o Staff report, status, overlapping authorities Jack Mauritz and alternative processes to resolve issues 6. Non -local Funding Issues a. Land related development o Staff report, capitol and operating costs, Jack Maur-_tz review of suggested alternatives o Task force discussion, b. On -lake casts of public access o Staff report, capitol and o; rating costs, Jack Mauritz review of suggested alternatives o Task force discussion 7. Other Business �. Adjourn Pat Scully, Chair METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TASK FORCF ON LAKE MINNETONKA Thursday, February 6, 1986 '0�/, 1 : 30 p.m. - 3: 30 P.M. Conference Room AJAN 3 AGENDA JF o�la�ra 1. Call to Order Pat Scully 2. Approval of Agenda 3. Minutes (notes) from task force meeting of Jan. 22, 1986 (enclosed) 4. Revised Draft Report Outline (enclosed) Jack Mauritz 5. Community Planning rroposals--Distribution of materials received and first staff analysis Jack Mauritz 6. Discussion of King's Point Site (2:45) a. Presentation of City of Minnetrista (2:45) b. Presentation of Minnesota DNR c. Task force questions and discussion 7. Briefing: Research on Lake Minnetonka, present status and future needs Charlie Smith 9. Report and interim developments Chair Scully Task Force Members Staff 9. Ot`ier Business 10. Adjourn Pat Scully, Chair SA394- /PHOPN' M E T R O P O L I T A N C O U N C I L Suite 300 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 Notes of the Meeting of the METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TASK FORCE ON LAKE MINN:TONKA January 22, 1986 ATTVMnA MrV Task Force Members Present: Patrick Scully, Chair; Dirk deVries, Dottie Rietow, Donald Stein, Michael McLaughlin. Metropolitan Council; Robert Rascop, Lake Minnetonka Conservation District; Dave Cochran, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; Wally Clevenger, Mayor of Minnetrista; Larry Donlin, Mayer of Minnetonka; and Kathleen Wallace, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Council Staff Present: Bob Nethercut, Gary Pagel, Jack Mauritz, Karen Schaffer Others: Lee Sheehy, attorney for Minnetrista; Bill Turnblad, planner for Minnetrista; Bill Jensen, planner for Mound; Richard Knapp, Mayor of Excelsior. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda for the Jan. 22, 1986, meeting was unanimously approved. APPROVAL OF DEC. 16 MINUTES The minutes of Dec. 16 were approved as amended. Chair Scully reported on meetings in the interim, includi. the Mound (01.07) and Tonka Bay (01.09) planning meetings. Since most task force members attended one or both, no detail was presented. -cully and Mauritz reported on correspondence from: - Shorewood - Minnetrista - Wayne Tutbough (assumed to be a Lake Minnetonka area resident) Also distributed: - Department of Natural Resources (DNR) "ProJo-t- CORE" (fisheries enhancement program, information requested at Dec. 16, 1985 meeting) - Article on the Tonka Bay meeting from "Sailor" newspaper, south shore addition. Rascop distributed a summary of a Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) planning conference. He summarized the findings `page 5) as that: "LMCD does not want to increase the access on the lake because that would require us to increase the amount of regulation on the surface of the water." Mauritz asked if it is safe to conclude, however, that the LMCD board intends to tecome a good deal more active in lake matters? Rascop replied he believes no, for example, they are wovking on information and education products for local ^able. TV re.; -ease. Wallace noted a motion from the Dec. 16, 1985, meeting as follows: Wallac moved staff should reevaluate the mission statement and develop a new schedule for future task force and committee meetings. Donlin seconded, motion passed. She noted that the motion has been carried out but the minutes from Dec. 16 should show it. Moved by Wallace, seconded by Donlin, motion to add this motion to the amended minutes passed. Schaffer --Briefing Legislation Authorities for Fees In response to a staff request for advice on the issue o.' charging fees for use on public water bodies in Minnesota, Schaffer noted that ':here is a large body of information on water law in Minnesota law. However, she found the following: o Fundamental, the rij:ht to use public bodies of water is vested in all the citizens of the stat,�, access questions aside, there is no difference between riparian owners and the general public. The latter seems to mean that the state could trot charge people to use the water for ordinary purp.ses, including recreation and commercial. o The right of the state and political subdivisions to rcr,,late use is separate. Thus, regulations on swimming, fishing, boating, etc., to ensure the public use is OK. o The access issue, across private land, is not connected, thils access can be denied (on shore). This seems to be why the state has gctto..n into the business of acquiring access to water. The state is mandated to acquire and develop sites under some conditions. o The state is authorized to charge fees for the use of these sites (access sites). Question is, is there inconsistency between charging an access fee (for the use of the site) to get to the water? She sees none. '"he charge is for the use of Facility, not the lake. a An area that is not clear is, "what is free access?" She thinks it could have two meanings: - Free access means no dollar (monetary) free barrier to anyone wanting to use the surrace of the lake, i.e., no expense to the user. - Free access could also mean no political barrier, that .'1 no legislative, regulatory or administrative harrier. No requirement of constituency or similar barrie- can exist. A court, to decide, might look at how DNR has interpreted access administratively over the years. It appears that DNR has pretty much used the first definition, but with some exceptions. Park entrance fees, though not launch fees, are Still a monetary barrier to getting on the lake, thus, the fee for a facility use does not make an access less of a "free" access. A non- discriminatory fee, which does not screen out users, is probably OK. Rascop: The charge to the task force is not merely to define issues. That's been done. The taff statement is that the principal issue remains as: the achievement of adequate boat launch and shoreline access on Lake Minnetonka, with an outcome as stated in the present document. Scully: That remains the principal one to ba addressed and there seems to be agreement about it. Wallace agreed, went on to "other issues," feeling that some other related subsidiary issues (beside the three listed in the staff paper) are important to the task force work. Should also consider: - municipal policies (p. 23) controlling development and marinas, for example. - Commercial access. - Education/public relations/public information for lake users. Rascop: Subsidiary issues should only enter if they directly impinge on the central issue, all related to increased access. Wallace: Disagree, past statements from LMCD and from DNR both point out that the problem is not just one of access but of surface use regulation. Rascop: By increasing access, we will increase the amount of use and that will increase the necessity of regulation. Cochran: Must address the wider related issues or there will be no resolution. Donlin: Thinks they 's been some prioritization by staff. Mauritz/Nethercut: Agreed, in the sense that the primary problem and subsidiary ones seem to respond to the charge in an achievable way. The task force, however, determines its own report. Rascop: Does not want to create a series of problems which somebody must be created to address. He doesn't want to see a reason to have Metropolitan Council out solv,_ng the problems of Lake Minnetonka. Clevenger: Agrees with Rascop, disagrees that .idding access to the lake will not increase the problem. Cochran: The d.'_rectinn to a "comprehensive review" implies looking at related issues. Sheehy observed that the one thing moving the process along is the development deadline set by DNR. After much discussion, the motion was made and see,)nded that "DNR is requested to postpone proceeding with development of King's Point access until July ', 1986." Clevenger/Donlan motion passed. Wallace: On what basis will task force evaluate a r±commendation on King's Point? Decided t'zat DNR and Minnetrista are requested to make presentations or. the issue to the cask frrce. Ra:scop stated there are 13 accesses on Lake Minnetonka operated by municipalities and the county, do they have the same authority as DNR to charge a fee? Schaffer replied they have authority to charge for a facility they've built or maintain, such as a beach, ramp or a dock. Rascop: Is it your interpretation that a boat use fee would not be permitted? A boat sticker or certificate or Lake Minnetonka license is the example. It's not to regulate boats but a user fee. Schaffer said she thinks it is problematic. Cochran said the 1983 task force reviewed separate license among its approaches to funding. They too agreed that it was probably illegal. How or what possibility is there to get the law modified? Schaffer stated it's not in the constitution, thus is a modification of common l.. i. It's easier to change. ronlin: How would a sticker differ from the 'oat license of today? Schaffer: She assumes that a boat licensing program is designed to regulate boaters. Wallace: In a Minnesota county case, the court ruled ".list a lake user fee is tantamount to a license, only the state can put on a boat license, thus the county could not do so. It could be that the state could impose a separate license. Schaffer: It appears that the goal could be to regulate use so that all have some use. The concept is that, if the public is to have a surface use right worth having, some regulation for safety may be necessary. Donlin: Task force needs to address another question, are fees or other special revenues needed for Lake Minnetonka? Cochran: Believes very strongly that money is needed for law enforcement and for maintenance/construction and it should come from a broader base than the municipalities. This is consistent with the 1983 task force's positicr, as well. He recommends looking at the following sourc,9: - Look at fees - Look at DNR increasing license fee and/or distribute a greater percentage of what they receive now. The current division is tnae,:quate. Wallace: The question is funding more than fees --she ,grees that licenses are very low now but notes that it's been very difficult to increase them. She thinks there are at least three Choices to be reviewed: fees, license increase or special appropriation. (Tape unintelligible from here) Mauritz finished reviewing the revised work task document from stiff Rascop: The charge to the task force is not merely to de,�.ne issues. That's been done. The staff statement is that the principal issue remains as: chievement of adequate boat launch and shoreline access on Lake Minnetonkc th an outcome as stated in the present document. Scully: That remains the principal one t addressed and there seems to be agreement about it. Wallace agreed, went on to "other issues," feeling that some other related subsidiary issues (beside the three listed in the staff paper) are important to the task force work. Should also consider: - municipal policies (p. 23) controlling development and marinas, for example. - Commercial access. - Education/public relations/public information for lake users. Rascop: Subsidiary issues should only enter if they directly impinge on the central issue, all related to increased access. Wallace: Disagree, past statements from LMCD and from DNR both point out that the problem is not just one of access but Df surface use regulation. Rascop: By increasing access, we will increase the amount of use and that will increase the necessity of regulation. Cochran: Must address the wider related issues or there will be no resolution. Donlin: Thinks ;here's been some • ,L,ritization by staff. Mau.ritz/Nethercut: Agreed, in the sense that thi primary problem and subsidiary ones seem to respond to the charge in an achievable way. The task force, however, determines its own report. Rascop: Does not want to create a series of problems whicn somebody must be created to address. He doesn't want to see a reason to have Metropolitan Council out solving the problems of Lake Minnetonka. Clevenger: Agrees with Rascop, disagrees that adding access to the lake :ill not increase the problem. Cochran: The direction to a "comprehensive review" implies looking at related issues. Sheehy observed that the onp thing moving the process along is the development deadline set by EiR. After much discussion, the motion was made and seconded that "DNR is requested to postpone p^oeeeding with development of King's Point access until July 1, 1986." Clevenger/Donlan !notion passed. Wallace: On what basis will task force evaliate a re^ommendation on King's Point? Decided that DNR. and Mirnetrista are requested to make presentations on the issue to the task force. Donlin began a discussion to re -align the issues statement. Adequacy of boat access and shoreline access Funding for access -related land based cost factors Other funding Research Intergovernmental 2oordination Municipal policies Commercial access Public information/relations/education Add public response under "data." Add to data in I%sue A to evaluate King's Point access task force will use input from Minnetrista (and other municipalities in Zone 5), input from DNR and 10 point criteria from the 1983 task force. Wallace noted that a specific request for that data should go to DNR and Minnetrista. Draft Work Process Schedule. Nethe^cut ran down meeting schedules which were resolved as: Fer - 1:30 - 3:30 it-th - 9 a.m. - 12 p.m. Public Meetings - Should be on lake and off laKe - Staff will recommend places and dates for next meeting Set aside tentative dates for March meet discuss rough draft/f•_nal report, March 12 and 14, both at 9 a.m. Wallace: Will Council receive public comme. ask force report? -'*aff :voted that the report will progress from t. :an Systems Committee L� Metropolitan Council and thus is open to commt, at those points. Rascop: Hennepin County has announced that they will not accept LMCD criteria for parking on iounty roads. They will not sign nr car/trailers only, feeling it restrained the use of the ,public. They won't limit against other :iar parking. This creates a problem with reliability of parking Vor the 1983 task force. Cochran: is still available for parking --it's !List not reliable for car/trail?.... Perhaps such parking will need to L. fact^--d out as other examples have been proposed. Ts Hennepin County a part? the 1983 report? juggested that the topic of parking standards be laid by. Meeting adjourned At 4:00 p.m. -'A3852/04OPN 1N M E T R O P O L I T A N C O U N C I L Suite 300 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 DATE: January 29, 1986 TO: Metropolitan Council Task Fc-^e on Lake Minnetonka FROM: Jack Mauritz SUBJECT: Revised Draft Outline The attached draft report outline has been revised to reflect the changes established in task force discussion on Jan. 22. Staff gill use this document to guide the content of the report to Metropolitan Council and to the State Zxer,u*" 4 Council. iA3861!FHOPN! METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TASK FOPCE ON LAKE t1L4'L4nTONKA RE:'ISF.D DRAFT I 2RI T `UT1.1NE I. INTRODUCTION A. Request from State ExecuLive Council and a history of events Leading to the action ssk force and Metropolitan Council res?or%; C. Process uied by task force to develop t.h- report I_ BACKGROUND A. Brief: earlier studies, issue 4tate and tank forces/reports on Lace Minnetonka B. The 1 483 Lake %, i nnetc,nka !',.sk i :,rce: fi rdinaq and : ), menda C. Progress/Eve : f Pict. ` 8-1 III. ANV Y31S A. Primary Is4ue--Adequacy of ;..; considered: reline access on Lake I-tinnetonka - Plana submitted by each municipal.- - `.'tsff analyeis of - tted material - Ta3k force discus - .rrput from gener agencies - S scific input - s%.sion from Minnesota Department of Natural RAr Minnerrista Process If for-.? ::ill con.9'Ld.-. , ..r a r�i�ommandations on tnA issue from the ' 83 ask f ,rce or. 1 .,ice Minnetonka for acre-s and srr_,;red parking sites ..:1.1 be met in each zone and, if recommendations from a m ricipal.ity and/or zc . (tfle r from th..� : ,83 recommendations, Why that difference exists and wt.t'� sho;.i.d be d)ne about the ..ifference. Outcora is rererni--A s ement of corisister.cies and totLd inconsistencies )f ,ant si tr on regarding 'tie issue, an eval+lat lor± of : ..oabili t. feas''<+1i ty f the 1583 reco=enuaticns b- _. c n a Seasonable ti:nr C .me. Spec! fic,--Reco-amenk:atinna, Wit . suN,orr..im; disnur ' -n. t,,> he ..Xer utive o rr.ci_ about the ^ippr(_,)-iate 3e of t! sus Point Parcel. B. Non -Local Funding for land related development Secondary Issue--Nor.-local fum ing for on -land development and . tivities related to public ance--s. Topics within this heading incluL,e at least: - Development and maintenance costs of boat launch and shore access &. P.as. - Costs of signage and necessary surjort facilities. - Lo^.73. road improvements. - On shore enforcement and traffic safety costs and issues. Data to be considered: - Staff collected input from municipai�ties, LMCD and other agencies about current expenditures in these cost areas. - Governmental ar,' ,private estimates of future cost trends and needs. - Suggested funding sourC-s from i983 task force and from current participants. 2rocess Task forr, ",> cun_gir!er soli acted data and discuss and su: en alternatives developed ry staff and task force members. Outcomes: '.ats�:ment of the issues involved with meeting ti'i costs of necessary .and activities art developments for public access, including L, ci mz.tes df L 3r t-ad and a description and evaluation of alternatives. C. )the:, "Issues 1. Nca-local ". ing for o. -lake costs of public aceea:, mostly surface act i v-4.ties such public safety and lay** - n! ireement patrol on lako . Data to bti considered: Staff c.:... ` ed input from muni.cipa i ltied, LMCD and other agencier Estima` -om implementing author_':t•s about future tr-- ana netu s. Suggested fur A ng mechan!Fm 3, from all sources. Fir- !ess. Tasx force r��r ew of `:if ;.r' '.'_sc,:snion an,-.' review of suggested rlternatives. Outc.,mes: A «tatement of the issues .nvolved in meeting coats of on -lake activities, including estimates of magnitude and description and e:o'_uation of alternatives. 2. Intergovernmental coordination, the roles and responsibilities of each ag.:ncy or gout nmental body involved on Lake Minnetonka Data to be considered: - 1983 task force discussions and recommendations. - Input from all concerned parties, including but not limited t^ DNR, L.MCD, municipalities. - Public input; fr - hearings. - Council s�aff r- ,raisal and commentary. Process: Beginning with a recapitulation of the 1983 task force discussion, the task force should: discuss the current process; identify and/or clarify basic issues; suggest alternat'_ve3 which may offer potential solutions. Outcome: Within the schedule _.-itraints of this task force, staff believes that a l:i ification of issues and some consideration of alternatives may be the maximum which can be attained. A highly desirable goal would be a recommended process or alternative processes which detail a feasible route to the negotiated memorandum of understanding recommended in the 1983 task force report. 3. Municipal policies which relate to laze use and development on the lake Data to be considered: - 1983 task force discussions and recommendations. - Input from municipalities, agencies and the publi - Council staff appraisal and commentary. Process: Discussion of existing data, beginning with 1983 task force, recommendations from participants and clarification of issues. Consider/suggest alternatives developed by staff and participants. Ou ne: A position statement on t sues ,-_rarding current policies in the municipalities which iffeet the primary issue. Examples may be cited, alternatives may be suggested. 4. Commercial Access c;r Lake Minnetonka Data to be considered: - 1983 task forge report. - Developments since that time (staff to collect °r-m a_.• -,,es including municipalities and LMCD). - Biocentrics study data, other research data (if any;. Process: Task force tc onsider the magnitude of use from these sources, as best dete. maned, discuss impacts and amount/degree of control over this use which municipalities and concerned agencies may have. Some comparisons, such as lower St. Croix, may be considered in discussion of alternatives. Outcome: Position statement by task force on the issue as regards to its magnitude, need for remedies to problems perceivr and some alternatives. 5. Public information/education/relations about use on Lake Minnetonka Data to be considered: - statements about current and desi:•ed programs from active agencies on this issue including: municipalities, DNR, LMCD, Hennepin parks, others (including media?) Discussion of appropriate agenci-i, level of activity and current plans, if an,. Outcome: Position statement, recommendation if need and some alternatives to meet the level of activity seen as appropriate. b. Status of resear�;h on Lake Minnetonka use - Staff summaries of existing studies a:-d lata collection programs including the extent and topics addressed by existing data. - Staff reports on the scope of data needed to support decisions related to lake use issues. - Task force member• appraisals of existing data. - P .ter, and concerned party input on the 4ssue during ....rings or task force deliberati^ns. Process: The task forcA will be briefed by staff on the scope of existing data and appropriate data needs. With commentary .`r•om ^therm, the task force will consider recommendations for additional data necessary to future planning and decision -making. )utoomes: general evaluation of the status of data about use on Lake innetonka anC recommendations for •he additional data heeded to jupport future decisions relating t. lake use, water safety, accees, surft_ce use regulations and ether related issues. IV. FINDINGS See III, outcomes A, B and C above. V. RECOMMENDATIONS See III, outcomes A, B and C above. SA3857/PHOPNI CITY OF ORONO CORPORATE. WORK PLAN JANUARY 1986 - DECEMBER 1g96 RESPONSIBLE TARGET AREA OBJECTIVE INDIVIDUAL DATE PRODUCTION Service Provision Review Solid Waste Determine role in view Gerhardson 3/86 of State mandates **Police Dept Develop Business Kilbo „'96 Strategy Plan/ Contractual Services Review Streets Develop Business Gerhardson 4.86 Strategy Plan,' Contractual Services Review ••Utilities Develop Business Gerhardson 6i96 Strategy Plan/ -ontractual Services Review **Building and Develop Business Mabusth 4/86 Zoning Strategy Plan;' Contractual Services Review Fire Develop Business Kilbo/ 8/86 Strategy Plan/ Bernhardson Contractual Services Review •Golf Course Develop Business Gerhardson 3,'86 Strategy :)rn • indicates items on Administrator/Council Goal Setting •• Indicates Staff Strategic ?lan Short Term Goals dratt 2/4/66 STATUS NEXT OBJECTIVE RE..PONSIDI.F TARCET AREA OBJECTIVE INDIVIDUAL DATF PRODUCTION Operations r3nagem-nt flananement Information Explore Applications Systems - Bldg i Zoning Mabusth 7/66 - Public Works Gerhardson 51/86 •'Information and Deve1^p .-)als; Mabusth 1/86 Referral Work Plan Implement `ticrofilm Project Bring up to date - Reorganize files/ Hallin 3/86 space rearrangement - Microfilm Guidelines Hallin 5i86 - Finance/Utility/ Kuehn/Lattin Personnel files - Explore alternato Hallin 4.'86 copiers/reader-; - Bldg"Zoning files Mabusth - Police Kilbo - Public%Private Destruction Schedule Emergency Preparedness - Review Program K_lbo 3/86 - Exercises 8/86 - Alerting System 4/86 Installation Risk Management Develop seminar Lattin 5/86 Review objectives Service Delivery .>ystems Public Works Explore means to Gerhardscn 6.'86 improve flexibility of personnel • Indicates items on Administrator/Council Goa? Setting " Indicates Staff Strategic Plan Short Term Gozils STATUS NEXT OBJECTIVE 2 RESPONSIBLE TARGET AREA OBJECTIVE INOSVIDUAL DATE STATUS oRODUCTION Capital Resources ••?hysical Facilities Present Facilities Bernhardson 3,'96 Assessemnt to Council Determine Facilities 5.186 Direction MSA System Develop,'Sibmit Capital ;6 Budget City Vehicle Develop Policy Gerhardson 4/86 Adninistrati^n Capital Resources - Review for Lattin 3/86 acquisition/disposal - Develop/review Kuehn 6/86 renewal program C-unty 15 Developmrnt Coord.r;ate development ;erhar9son 7/69 ^rystal Bay Sewer Project completion Gerhardson 6/86 *Stubbs Bay Project Consideration Gerharlson 4/86 'atfron Project F•-asibility 9/86 Consider Project 11/86 Commence Project 4/89 Complete 11/87 • Indicates items on Administrator/Council Goal Setting •• Indicates Staff Strategic P:an Short Term Goals NEXT OBJECTIVE 3 RESPOASIBLE TARGET AREA OBJECTIVE INDIVIDUAL DATE PRonUCTION Human Resources •Compensation Plan Implementation Plan - Bernharlson 5/86 Comparable Worth •Goal/Evaluation System Implement 2/86 Staffing Review Select Areas for Review 5,86 Determine Recommendations 3/66 employee Assistance Update System 4/86 Employee Right to Develop Program Gerhardson 4,'36 t: n ow • Indicates items on Administrator/Council Goal Setting •• Indicates Staff Strategic Plan Short Term Goals STATUS NEXT OBJE TIVE 4 IMSPONSISLIB TARGET AREA OBJECTIVE INDIVIDUAL DATE STAM max? OWMCTIVR l u PRODUCTION PRODUCTION RELATED organizational Development and Management trateo:c Manning 1986 Development Days Bernhardson 12/86 Initiate process Bernhardson 6/65 ••- Staff Development/ Develop Game Plan Gerhardson` 6/86 Team Work Program xia -ts& Ordinance Review Develop Process Hallin "','85 Maintenance Program Bernhardson 2/86 Zoning Ordinan-e Upgrade Mabusth 8/86 **Comprehensive Storm Initiate,'RFP's Bernhardson S/ 6 Management Plan Complete Bernhardson 16186 Financial 1987 Budget Successful Development Kuehn/ 16,115/86 and Adoption Bernhardson ludget Training Develop/Utilize Fuehn/ Supervision Capital Budget Review Policy/ Kuehn! 6.!86 Progra Bernhardson Financial Strategy Develop Program Kuehn/ 3/86 Bernhardson - Incli.de Fund Balance Qui'-?lines Marketing Corporate Explore Alternatives to Bernhardson 6/86 Communciation communicate to community - Cable TV - Print media Crime Prevention Fund Review Progress Kilbo 7/86 • Indicates items on Administrator/Council Goal Setting •* Indicates Staff Strategic Plan Short Term Goals 5 •ESPONSTA TAR':Elr AREA QBJrCT*VE INDIVIDUAL DATF PRnDUCTION RELATED Policy Boly Legislative Policy Develop program Bernhardson 1,'86 7rog•am Tax Forfeiture Policy "evelop policy for tax Mat.usth 2/86 forfeitur policy review *Highway 12 Corridor Developed through Bernhardson/ 4/39/86 Study Phase 3 Mabusth •RedP-•_.vpment Develop strategy Bernhardson/ 1i/85 ^_pability/ Mabusth **Feasibility Commence Navarre Bernhardson/ 2/86 study Mabusth Tnitiat Navarre Bernhardson/ 5/86 �irection M.3busth Administration Data Privacy/ view/Update Bernhardson 5/86 Public Data Oli-*ss • Indicates items on Administrator"Council Goai Setting •• Indi^..tes Staff Strategic Flan Short Term ,,)ais 6 STATUS W.XT OBJECTIVE LIST OF LICF RS FOR COUNCIL_ APPROVAL FOR MEETING O. ` February "A 1986 Septic System Installer - Marty Bros 9436 Quaker Laia Osseo Re Wential Kennel - John & Ginger Traul 4640 west Branch Road Mound 0 VEB 211336 CITY of ORONO ("qNd IMy, Mmne.ub'JTGI am nlNba/11%)M, 4137357 ASSLSS16n SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLLI<S LICENSE APPLICATION All questions must be answered. License fee, none, cerciricare of insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification or Home Sewage Treatment Workshop attendence must accompany this application. All applications are subject At�o- a.t(en (10)�jday approval period. 1. Business or trade name 'c 2. Business address q±r z %I L Oss e _ 3. Business phone q;t S-33i / Residence phone 4. Name of applicant or company representative holding MPCA certification � A zy' r,. 5. Type of certification held: 1i2nstaller _ Pumper Site evaluator SystemDesigner Is this a P, ovisionaY —Certif irate? _ Certificate No.(09151 6. If no Certificate is held, provide evidence of attendance at one of the On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshops held immediatel prior to the current construction season. 7. Have you e,.r held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before?12,__ Moat recent year S. Have you ever had a lice.,se revoked?/0 O When? Where? _ 9. Do you do Municidal Sewer cook -ups? Yes C No SUBP(TWq,�t TRED 83'3q 1< 1. $2/5.0000license application fee. 2. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as oblig The State Plumbers Bond will rot be accepted. 4 3. $10-5t-.00,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. 4. Copy of current MPCA Certificate or evidence of attendance at On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshop held immediately prior to current construction season. LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE. SUBMITTED. List persons other than applicant who are author zed by you to apply for permits under your license Dn� /"lYcT/ _ The undersigned hereby makes application t6 the City of Orono, Minnesota, for license to install and repair septic systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of Orono. Date le Applicants Signature e'-er� 4rioy� Staff recommendation Approval Denial _ Date CITY Reason for denial: _ USE City Council Action Det, -- p roved _ Denied ONLY Date license mailed _ P.O. BOX b6 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 473-7357 License Year 19 Att questions must be a:xeeted. Bemuse ,See must accompany application. Att appticat4o,t3 aAe subject to appnovat by the City Ciuncit. 1. Owner's Name 2. Property Addr 3. Mailing Address (if different) _ 4. Phone (Rome) 'I-7379 (work) 376-6 -?6-? 5. COMMERCIAL Kennel License Information a) Name of business b) Business activities (check) boarecig veterinary care ,I FS Ding breec ng retail/wholesale sales j�`' --,grooming other (specify) �.._�.,•� lJY ( (; . C) Normal business hours: weekdays AM to PM Saturdays AM to PM Sundays/holidays AM to __PM d) After hours contact: Name Telephone e) Dog runs/exercise areas are: inside outside both 6. RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Information V 066S C 0eoeEnSTI Y a) Maximum number of dogs (over 6 mo's old) to be kept at any one time b) Principal breed(s): _15� C) Purpose of keeping more than 2 dogs %FI AVFe -5_rQA04 ASV d) Dogs normaliy kept: _ inside home separate kennel structure ...u..u...uuu..u.�.��........u..0 u....»......e.e..,.e. u......u»..e The undeuigned hereby makes application to the 04ono City Councit bon a Kennet License as 6peci6ied on this 604m; the undeuigned acknowtedgee that a kennet License ie penmiz6ive only and does not 94ant any authou ty to violate any ptovision o6 any City Ordinance on other taw Ott nts .tegutation; the undeuigned hereby grathe City peAm.issi.on to inspect the pnemi.60 ptiDA to License approvat and at anri other reasonable Lime duAinq the License duration; and the undeu.gned agrees to abide by the teq"iements e6 MW , .pat Code Chapter 63 inetuding any speeiat conditions inq)osed by the City Councit as paAt o6 v y 4ennet License approvat. KIND OF LICENSE Commercial Kennel License $100.00/year ,; At _esidential Kennel Licensc $ 25.00/year a• V. can Date s+ ue.u..0 u.0 u..u............�. ..u.0 u..0 uu..... u.uuu..... ., M.f.M. .YI'�ena X Wn�a � t'arm. CITY OF 04040 Alb 4'd-43 NAME )IY PAY4 Y-T-3 a - - - - - - SROSS S4333 E4P/A_L34 ANDERSON BL 31 3878.28 1422.4O BERNNARDSO NE 12 5015.96 1592.32 BOBZIEN SA 31 2173,74 154*54 RRINER CA 90 0.00 30DO BRINKHAUS JF 42 3964.31 1358.33 BURMASTER WO 51 3991,42 1336*72 CARLSON VJ )2 3723.28 1180.R8 CHECK JM 30 0000 Bloc CHESNICK GB 31 3986.51 1316,56 CLARK BP 31 2329.37 741.00 CORNICK JL 31 2277.54 775039 EDMUNDS P 90 0000 0000 EHRENBERG DL 93 1114-60 319.46 ENGLISH II IH 31 2?30elS 935,33 ERICKSON DJ 13 Bloc Bean ERICKSON KR 31 4353,61 ►621.65 FRITZLER JM 31 3FS2.96 1156.54 GAFFRON MP 33 3154059 1054.88 GALLO DE 13 0000 0000 GERHARDSON JA 42 44i28.78 1314.40 GREGORY JD 42 3198,61 1167.54 HALLIN OM 12 2566.80 358*52 HANSEN SC 42 2999.71 906873 HANSING CJ 31 1019,12 405.20 HENNING JP 10 0.00 )630 HENS EL MR 31 1713064 986048 HIGUS PA 9) 1313803 291052 JACOBS TJ 33 3031.15 1013*50 JOHNS RJ 90 0400 3030 JOHNSON BP It 3131.36 1183*05 KIL80 MH 31 4618.48 ti44.40 KIRNYCZUK M 31 3137.83 1239914 KLAERS AB It i45.60 154040 KNUTSON CA 15 2L73.50 726.R1 KRIMMEL OL 13 DODO 3600 KUEHN IN t5 4LB6043 1591.12 LATTIN JC l5 2566*81 858.32 MABUSTH JA 33 3935.33 1282.72 MANUEL CM 10 128.00 252000 MCGOVAN LR 10 3154*56 1051.52 MORONCZYNS J I 4440004 1584044 MROSS FT 51 2563.84 991.51 NAAB It. l2 1164.06 554.12 OAS DO 13 0400 2000 OMAN LE 33 1145*90 544.54 PALMER PB 31 GOOD DODO PEARSON SC 3l 3197.53 1531.55 PETERSON Pt. I? 1264.33 412.32 PETERSON RV 13 0000 3*30 PROVO dJ 12 0.00 )030 0UAST KA 12 2027*16 451.59 b;s►4s4;;0% m VING FEES 211986 1IiY OF ORONO CITY 3F 040NO _ P A Y t Y-t'3 • - - — - E13L-ND NAME III G103S 330iS EKP/ALLOd ROLF DJ 30 16A.25 93.30 ROYCRAFT GE 33 0000 3130 SASS JJ 12 3042093 1331,31 SELLNER CL 33 0000 3030 SELSTAO ER 33 0000 0.00 SIEVERS RC 93 t85.00 3033 SKREEN OS 32 2381.89 1339.43 SLIGO SR 33 0000 3.00 SMITH JR 32 255YO95 355.68 STEFFENHAG RE 93 3023.97 1313. 23 STEVENS BG 33 0.00 3600 THIES 3R 90 395000 I03.30 TNONTON MR 31 1350058 115305% TOMCZYK MV 31 4Z19.56 1322.11 NOYTCKE SM 31 0000 3030 COUNT GRAND 450999812 1 'A13 00017 T3YAL 00066 TOTAL TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS = 23r2S5.98 EYLOYEAS FI:I A = GROUP HEALTH 8 = PHYSICIAN'S i_A-TH PLAY C = BLUE CROWILJE SHIELD D = MEDICAL CCYT_3 3LAN E = PRUDENTIAL F = COORD. HEA-TH CARE G = MINNESOTA 440 N = TRANS-AMERI:A D.C. I = BANKERS Ll'E J = MUTUAL SERVICLS K = MUTUAL OF 3141A L = EMPLOYEEIS 3ENE=If M = AETNA N = NICOLLET Elf.L 0 = LEAGUE OF ;IflEi 2 = HLALTH CAR`_ 4411T ACCT. MISSING HOSP CO3`- FDA SOME -R'L'S 1 1. 1111 n I. ill JNL:. RESISi.4 91•il-Pe P0•.1 I :4.:. 'i1. J11L F.JJII IEWN it )[iLR1r1139 4i:JJV U. IN. 4 •.w. \ P'•.♦ + •:10. ]:/O3/., 1,105.18 E464 DIST _I) •14.4 !1-HII-•J YfI N45.;LL NIA. 02105/9, 33.49- E46I= DIST LIJ )li: II-Hib alY 9U VVLL t.s11.41 . ! I N=1>)I 02/23/V. 94ol LON441ME W634J4 Iq Li44'_ JI-N4bllYra PJ►.LL 14.51 161.3. E3 11ILLTPi •I%- JtcM II-t{T2-SII-4u Np�LL .]IS:+ U2103186 3.25- EJ P41LUry VI\`_ ItIC I1-4113-615-9I -LIU 15I.11 1 02/0314. 162.61 P4164 IT%L rlrE •140N II-Hl2-5U-'N R\W al 0210314. 1.19- P4104 vl%L ri\' JI iC 1I-403-5/3-fU VLdLL I 159.42 H-T it 02/03186 191.20 ED POILLIPS MIS- •ACN )1-6112-115-fa r41JLL 1 .ia 61J 02103/s. 3.12- C7 M0.L1^: i1o: )1:E II-0413-5I5-10 P4#.LL hiss I .:I.il 32103/6. 195.94 JJNIi0r NR)S RI Ii •A:N 71-4112ro15-JC w•H4 i'lill 22/03/4e 3.31. JONISJR 893S WI` )li: 11-4q)-S1 Y96 •.WLL t91.)3 I •. u u ...... 2.462.14 FJN it 10l4: LI ]JN )Ii t4ll ri Nra 2.\.>. i♦ TOT%L - IV.. Lill U. U.UNu CNl CA KIWI, 52-0.•M P..1 1 CnLL. N.. IUIt AMOUNT of NUON 111. 01]0IPIION AOLOl1IT W. I... P P.Y. . .A ... .E ' YSeVY0 02/20/0t 19.9/ ACNO-OlknsUTA INC Off SUPPLIES 91.0210-YSv-li Y le9 Vu OO/t0/P. 0.31 ]CYO-NINNASOTA INC Ulf SYPPLit\ 01-t21\•0S0.1. 4 Seu0e 02/iV/66 60.0 4.U-NINNttUTA INC U.f t.PPLIG 01-0210-061-IS 4lev4e Y0/20/Ot 1I.63 Acoo-NINNESUTA INC Wf OUPPLIfS 01-441p-100-31 OSw 40 42/i0/t. 9.41, Koo•NI NIGUTA INC Ulf PUPPLItP t1-0210-116-13 Y S.YV. Y2NV/6e 4.)1 ACOU-0,I1INESv1A INC Off SUPPLIG 01.OE10•HO..Y IBO.N _ •....• ....CAP OS6011 V2/20/B\ 25.19 AMERICAN LING MI BLO./GNU] ll•UA!-SI S-90 95.74 ' Yl.U.1 YL,2J/e0 65e.i5 APPLE VALLEY AGENCY 0... 9.IP IN] i4a31\-515-9Y OS..25 - •..... ....C., .50U51 42,201e. 6.93 AT A I CO." TLLLP-L-f al -A 320-1,4-f• . u•.• u..(tP V5001,9 02120140 902.91 BANTON SAND G GN 51 .NI 5UI 01•til l•C•O.AT 9t2.91 ..0 •• ..•.CAT - 0S00e5 92/20/BC SS.OU d6ACAVAIA\ P SUNS BLU./GALL 1.Nt Y1.0 U-V N9.I1 SS.JY ' •....• ....C.5 A5..OU 02/20/O. Se.Ou BNUONLYN PNINIING PYG/PURL YI•.322.1i1-)1 ' 456GOV 09/20/00 26.0U p.vy.NN POINTING P.G/PVOL Ol-.lii-I N•fl 45.V94 02/20/00 26.00 D-UO.LTN NIINTING P../PUa \1-. R2'l25.31 104..J A ' YSe uv1 02,0010. 105.30 GU1CNE5 BAN SUPPLY Nil PVYLF 1L.K4•]l5-9♦ J5.30 .....• .. .C.] .S014V 02/i0/\t 8,p10.13 CA]E PU.Ew t EQUIP NIT NI\C EQUIP Ol-.).2-i90.12 t,p1Y.]f . G .SOIL. 02/20/B. 12.00 COCA COLA VENDING EVYIP ILNIq 71-4331•SIS-44 V SOIiY 42/29/I6 12+1YV COCA (OLA VENDING Nlt PVYIN t1•I12Y•SIS-94 � ISe.OY I+a6 LIT, OF WOMB LMCS Rt6151EN 6f-N`00 14.9 J • C-%C- ... uATt a.UUNT V N DY t D Ill. Yt KNIYt IYn AILYYRi w. INV, a P.O. • .<U.61 • • 4Ss1 SY 06/2$H6 W.$) CVLUNIAL LIFE I%$ CU MAL1. I" 03-NSI-Ifl-31 .5.130 02f20H6 /1.03 Cv U% 4 LIVE 1.6 LY MILI* q$ 01-e9Sl-If6-I1 .5613Y pt/20/N 1S.YY CVIDNIAL Lift I" CU M.L1. lot Ylvi51•3f0-11 • U6.e6 • 6�s11) p2 /20fU 12.06 CVY*-REV GALE{ TLL GAUP TA J.e-CYL VIAL YI-2tti`p60v0 .56133 e2f20f66 2.05 CUY*-Ytv SALE$ TAX S.LE3 TLL it& 01-noo-0.6-00 • YA 1is 62f20/6e S.46 CY**-REV {ALE$ TAX *.Lt6 l..-wv 65-*10 61 N!$tv66-N Y s6153 Off[YH6 2,316.Yv E~41V $ALE$ TAX 0qt* I., J.O 11-A&WOVO-94 GS.133 '62120166 t04.00 CYM-REV 64LE5 TAX 6.l.16 7.1 41. ITS-O5 /2-2iMwN-Q • 2.541.0u ..A..• ....CIS • 65D1.2 O2/2u/6. I74,45 CUFT DUF f` INC Off >YYlclt{ 01-6fU-I2M 71 IT...s . • . •.... . oK66 AS, 456151 04,201.6 30.10 COLLISAN -%I 6LD4/6RUS 01-003-.N-1) 4lDIS4 Od.[0/AO 20.30 CULL 164b and 610b6.O6 7I-4143-515-94 51.00 A • ...... ....Lae 4561eS 02/2o/8D 1,suv. 10 DAT OYS1U6YTING Cu Get* POOL" 71-4011-515.1Y v So103 42/20/as 51.24- 0" DISTNIVOTING Cu 6.1 oil 11-w16-S15-14 1,4TS.S4 • •. v al ,. .l.A6 Ysslbe .1...... 621.35 E661E UISTRI$UTI M. It, Fuel.* 11.0416-515-90 05.10. 02/t0/66 16.45- LA.LE DISTNIGUT1K L,6 111K /1-Nfl-lI5•N V5.16. 02/coto. 6.3.22 EAGLE DISTSIYUTING t/Yt vu.C. ibM1f-51YN • 45c IDn 02/L0/eb I9.62- OGLE D1STRIOUTING e1Nl VIAL /l•.413-SIS-64 I...I.sv . • u5elbl 0[120f66 I..A.1S EAST SIDE SEYEOA6t OILY YWCY 71-061S-SIS-04 u SDtD7 .212016. .2.60- EA>T *lot OLVENAGE ivy SAT ll-N16-SiS•04 1.30l.Is L S6IVv 02,20,56 3.434.64 RDLF E E.ICYsON AS>t{SING CO&SYLI YI-L 30Ivl6-N 3,41t.0Y . ...•.. ...-C46 b56243 02/40/06 111.49 E"ICa$D*/.WT OFF SUPPLIES YI•R10-120-31 L 05.203 02/26fbe 40.05 EYICASUN/RUNT Uff foul♦ 61-4540-12e-11 Ives L111 01 V..FU Eft CO a.IS11Y YL•L-Y. ra•e I A Cot I - Q. Jall aMOVnT V(FVUM 11l• JL >CY (If IYY •.LQYY1 41, Ib, V /,L, • K >a1.1 Fb Y5.0\ • 0 ...... •...... , Y5.25e 0L/!0/N 111,.0 Gt1YVIFI 0.010 CU I.VIO PI) ACCUY 01 •.!f!-NL•1 V5.25e VI/20/0• df.al LLFV 4t P.PtS CU 1.110 rib 1CL"b 01-\!S!•l•p-.1 �Y 201.13, • •.....5 • 45.255 Sd/!0/N 2a..5 futb.VJV iFLLE.DUD U11.01.1p .1•U!Y•p\\•11 d..e5 P V5eL 12 02/20/S0 104.00 G E a SE.VICts CLOIMIY4 JI-\Ld1-!•\-\I 05.LTL 112/40/4. 15.f2 0 .. bt..Uta fl .FI aJI ul••2)YLH••2 .5.02 pi/!0/ss .3.21 F • > Yt.a CLS MI OIL t ..0 YI•U O-\v\•il 161.59 • 4 ..•C.a .5.2b4 p2:20/0e 111.15 wary♦ 11K UISI .ISC I. PV.C. TI-dH NYYp•00 05.1.9 K124/eY IO.OL ..PP1 T1.t JIST .1E• rib .VOLn 11-aSl O•)I Y\Y T. ISa.TS uu•. P V 5OCV1 L2/dLIOe 2Y.uV .[.F LTl CFIL{f P11( C.\1 /Y(nU4l .1•L)5\-ILI-f. 2J,VV Y C •• .C.O .....• O Ss lL1 02/LO/Ys 1.0. 1.eY wL.w CT1 IN DIV J.IL Cn495 11-43U-V60-16 > t.teS.eu ...KNIT C ...... o2/2018. LL•la ne%ft C11 501IN1{a DPT L.LIM PIS LCCEEs LI•a212-IL\-11 .5.fue ' r .S.ffV 02/20/11e 11.p! ICML SETPMFT CUPP TIN. 1"?-219166 p1-•I10-034-12 )1,42 1 � ••.KaE to YSs Je) 92/20206 17.29 TVM JSCVbS .ILLSLt al.45111- i\-fS 1T.22 •• ...s el •••... ob.112 OL/dSA. 41.40 JJM.1 AUTU SUPPl1 twull Pit ACCEIS 01-Yd 32-I2\•f1 Q ir... .S.f T! V .. Ot/i0/06 19•.YS JVI.YS >UTU SUPPL• (.WP fib ACLlbl 4l••tJ[-2•v •.2 Nu CtTT W V,tOW U.[Ca RYIATt• u!v•-w Vt-t ` CnEL• NV. JATt IPu•atT Vt,54u0 11lP .IKOlpfllb AtI Gu.I 6Y, 1... I ..Y. A ...... ...... YSbf.a 04120/66 64.64 J.-Olu. PIPE* CV VO.t 6.PPLUS Il•4t 3Y-ili•1t a6... A ...... .... Cab IS 141 0i/24IN 146.75 A I A .t.TaLS 6b 611111V II -I )t PSli-.l D 56341 02,:*/66 1.250.40 L . a YL nTall aiVwc Ptbi II•U3Y 513•cY 1. N6,15 ..•... ....CIA Y5631I 02R0t06 AS.*? aA..•Ymu"'s T.IVII-PIUYb[ ll•U/l'4..'IS _ Y So NI 0t/t0/0. 4.69 auf n..TwPAi I-AKI-1•ILE.6t 11•.N V1. 1.11 4SSW 02,2016. 1.66 .L.%-T.... 3 T•A.tvI1EA4L T2.4191-S..•.t 45039T 02/90/66 2.bt Put n..lnubAS T-AVII-••ILII4E 71.P341-1.1-11 55.0. A 05b464 02/20.0b 177.26 7.t LA.EV P*Iw I PUAI 41•U@-4/B-.. 4S.461 92/24/66 9S.60 T-k LAwl- •u.LLtl.Lhb Il•.521-141-19 t12.66 A _ •..... ....... VS011. O9/t0/00 1.212..E L'•C•LAED. Ail. '-uUCA 1110E *tL SIIta a4*. 01•U Db-le4•fl ...a.. .. .C.4 Y Ss•11 OtRO/AO 30.0Y CIIV Lbt4 LA-t UIILIIILi 01-•3N'IrV-1t 34.06 . u30.39 edlielab 23.DY +•4 LA Fa-V T..CT.4 •uulP 015 4CCtS3 tll•41]t•2 M-•t V5.Y39 41z20/8b z.ft w`R Lk FORW TRACT" t..ls 110 AtEEba ul-Iz lt•riL-H 21,ae OSO.OV 02,20,06 1,011.96 APAA Olt DE/l ACE. Po-C. 11-lass-S15-44 _ u 56 Y60 O2/04/6. .6.89- "Ana bit Ulbf JVl i[3 11•N 16-Sf3-14 t,>•3.16 . Oe/2O/Ab 247..4 •AA1113 .AYAYnE N P.l Au1Y 41-4341-las-31 2.1.•. oAKU � •u... 1..a LIT' Of UWUW CK C. It.101t0 fI•...N FAN Y L nr lr. try• YYl[ •nVONI .t+UUY IIEw ✓l RYI•'+14A YQ YWI AY. lN• Y LY. A NNH/ r Y Ss.7. 041461I6 KT.4 .AMTE COf." a.[ ... s-JA. fi•J{<f•YYM Y1 4 )Oe 1+ YJ/YY/b 4,31e.t] IYr )It.l• KIY4 AttIC COAIYh ..Cl wMIY {A L. lE•I NJ•YYMW r le, se S..S .u.++ •F.K[Y r Y56+M1 02/10/es tt. .1LLEY YAvia CO Iw:. A +VN al-. !2J•. N•Iz it... • r �+ YS..e) O$RY/.a 11.21 w.L1 U[IYE. GU May PUC tv.11 11•AAI•+..-.t OS6.Y0 Ot/z01/0 700.63 .14610.5co YIIL11111 I:Nl2M4F I- 10 iN.Ai .....• .... .Y r Y SYS{) w2/20/86 SO.+Y AA PULIUiI YM CYYTYLI CYM L aCnVUlt /S•Af10•SAA•+. )e.YY . r r U%b5lY Y.Ieola. Y2).)Y wevroN 3.,.1 It .AI fyI el-+z)s-t•\-•t 62l.a6 usa5.. 92120/ee 166.70 Y.91.4t .ARD.lot C.YIF ..1 .CCC" YI•.J )2-Y N•IT c V)e SYO Y212016. •S.+( A.FP4t nA.....I E.V11 I.1 ACCELY 61-A$)2•LY•St YSOSYO Y2/2Y/eo 9.11 6111120E nAAJA1NE L+u1i HI "Call 01-41".k l.•Sl Y)NY0 121$010. 9.41 AAYN.t n1.00A.L kYW1 /.T ALCti[ YI-a SJ•$H-+Y Q Y]Yi.Y Y2/201Ye S.K 44.~ .400.11t EYYU IST KCEa1 01-.J S2-2+Y•YI YSe).# 02/$Y/.a z.3a NOA.YE .1+Y.611E twll NI KC966 ti •.232-)Ya-.I Y5.SYa 02/:4I6a S.W AAYAANE .6.0.411E EWIF IMT ACC0a6 !f•.!)PS.Y-YY • YS655Y 02,20,06 31.%0 NLIS04 EATL*Pilak2 LEY ♦yYLw 71-N11-)IS-.• 05655Y 12/tY/16 03.50 .11&.4 tNTL.I.Iat) .I11 Iu•tw 7bJ12•)1]-YY ' Y).5)V O2/2Y/aY E.at AELWA t+TE.nletf A1. IYltw J1•A.$Y-SIS-IY IJ6.Y. e .u•f. ••.Kq YSa SSY 02/20/16 084.61 I..0 at LITtl ILUA•2+#•.! • "at" 02/$016. 4.7.10 N.P YIILllltf /I•Q2••51 S•6Y YS.laY a2/20/.6 157..1 A.. YIIL17116 1).. St••SahA$ 0S.550 62124/f6 ".31 NaP YIILIFI[f 76-.R.•S.Y•Y) � bSM.0 I Yee L:II JI UFUNV CF[C+ YLL11 TtM YY•(+`N •Kt V C ntle '+J. :1.L 1.WU41 I MU V+ ILL• YN1Y/111W LCLYWA, I YV. VY. • I•.• I Iq YINa ` uS\Seo YL/20/se SO.N NV.I-OL111 MY BELL WELL L1.1-.LB Y1.9St0•i [\-)1 L Se Sse J2/2Y/1e 50•40 NuYTFYL YTEYM EELL WHl LL611`:I4 •1.1 )!i•1 <+•)! YSes.. Y2120166 10.56 ftDwyF.t Sl(wk YELL TtLIPIBkt YI ••N1-t•e•et ` VSOSse 0?/2Y/1Y IS." NaYTMtlTa Y% FLIP uY LI\l V[N-PE1 YIN3S5-YYh 15 V 505ee OII4Y/LY SSO.SS ... T.NLLILYM L LL P." LINK 1pILLL YINSN•1L\•JI V Se iee 0'/f4/ee 502.95 4497..LSTtM. ILLL 1.1' LIMB IftBTµL 1+•B51Y•ef.-rY VSO SOT Yl/L0/0• SE.Y) NY[lwwtllkYN :ELL ILLtIFVNI 11-lKY-SI•i-/V .5e 5e• r1:2Y/N 1t.0 wwI E1 TE Y\ YE LI aurL•1lb!YO I1-+)2 )-51S-b vSN+• O2/20/1Y All" YUY !IIIIESTt++ YELL 1[LVnWt I4_.S15•N9-.l Y SO Sae Yl/tYI YO it."YJMT nwk iTtwO It LL 0w ♦INk VlftMU V•+lSY S+.•YI v 5s5se V2/211% 32..9 NUMTw [E iltwn YELL 1a�.Vwu-k 3-e121-Y9-\i u SuSee LL/t4/sa •7.11 MV2TFPUTa1. SELL u. Llwt•J u•1 LY N.•H5-)+•-11 1.470.63 •....• ...... V YS\191 B2129116 12.S3 PUBLIC 9WL LET .SEY PLWA 1/f7 TO 11418. 01.01at.110-11 9565Mt 02:2//0Y 1.11 YWLI 6-1 YET ISSF ItYt 1/1I IV j/\/YY YI •Y1+1•H1•IS ` YS9S4i Y2/2Y/Y• 2.Y5 PJYL I. FML YEI .SeN Ft-- 1/Ll lU j/V/1\ VINI+1•N+•N V SsSVI Y2/2Y/0• 111.12 IJBLIG LYIL LtT .SlN Ytft. 1/[1 14 [/vAb Y1 N101•W.•1] YSe541 02,201" 14.11 0Y011C twl Mil .... FL.4 If21 W 1/e10. YIN HIYN-U 4 YS15W Y2KY1Y\ 1.161.13 PUBLIC 1ftPc -it .1ON Itit "or TV t/\/u 01.11.b111.3i u SOS41 tall".. 19..1 PUBLIC LftPL MET ISlN PE.. 11.7 TV 21.1.1 Yt.4141-11]-)1 As." 1 92/21/06 L0.12 WOIIC IM all 15S. ...a 1/(l TO 11111. .INHI-Ill-Sl r 9SO591 C2/2016Y 1SS.l0 PUBIIC t"L MET .SlN YLY. 1/<T 10 2/NN YINI61-121-11 L SO59t vZ/(0/O• I75..1 PUBLIC tYPL MET Abaft IL.. I1<f 10 11116. 91-Blq `Il.-Il 4S•59I 92/2E/Be 261.2. PVIL LC Awl MET IL.ft PA.. 11[1 I9 11•11! .50"1 e2/101N 30.15 PUBLIC tMet M11 •e.e ItM• •1l1 le i/•11L .IN 111.2M-.I .5i5V1 e(/(1/11 1.1a PQ t1C AWL Ytf 1\•ft YCYe IIJ1 IJ (/\/!L •1.11.I-1.O-.1 .5055I v2/291.1 1.1.16 IVBLIG I-L BET ISSN Yu. 11.7 10 2/•/s9 71•I1.1-)ISN1 uSNyI 04124/e. 10).V\ '"III LwIL Off .S-% Iu• 1117 IY (/1/p IL-11U.„9NI VSe59I Ye,10101 1.e... P.6111 EMIL MET .3.4 It.. 1/2t lY 11N16. )f••I BI-SO\Nl VSeSV V2/2Y/4. IY.I) PUBLIC t-L NET 43&N t.[ V[I TJ 2/9/11 I+.•L LSYYNS We YSOeII 01/2Y/00 eS.SS PLPSI CUL./ICY BILL .1. F.wt. ll-t120-S15-.1 05.S5 • Y5OY12 J2Jj01.. 59.0. YLMYt S YELI LVC. LI MT 11-B 3B1.1•e-et u SOel[ 0L iv11e 7.01 -,-*To DEEP WC. ti Y•. T W.UI W. Y1.1N1-5.1.0t AW SS.00 i VSe\11 /2/29110 51.// PFUTY PICIUMT 100 WIIL!E1 •1N211-1ie•l[ 450ui> .1/[4/0e 59.00 P.47V 11CTJYT UP iVIYLIL3 11•VIP I2M S1 \i.\0 • OSee[Y 02/2014\ 1.25 10 P ILLIra 6 SUBS IV01.0t 6INJf1.110.11 • 19s. UIT J. LLNYMY CNl[• •1Y1{t\N • CntU Av. Yilt S.OYNT V\..IIIY lit- q.0I01ISIN v>.e<Y Y2/t1/N A.r) Sv P.IUIi4 / SY1R WSi.q YSN2Y {1/20!N e.t) U P.2N III • SUM{ LSI MI PnIII/P• • {W WUiN Y)Niv Y2/2Y/.Y Y.<S lY In ILl I11 { W.[ IYTIiq YLA . ( •u u• Y 5603• 02/20/10 Ir R1.S5 PY tos Dial •at• PY•[. ( Y)Y.S• uilivl.. 119.vY' PON"N DIST Dv) It, I.IIS.>S � uMau Y Sse)u 62,20,06 •57..s Yv.LITT MIFF Cu LIU PURL. WJALIIT .lN LU SO,vu . 01/2010p ID.4V Y C IkDENTIJICATIUMI Y.l fUP-Llit 10.=Y C2R0/•. 16.19 31 PAUL owl u11 SUPr1Ita Is.Sv ( ( YSeMFs is/iY/•. LISa.U. JUn. r .CwUt.I.G C.N. .t.T•L {I Y SppYf Ot/iY!U 11..YY Ju n4 r YCnY(:•IFG NY.. .SATµ 11 1.•B.uY . IT ( 45N11 •2/2{[Ob 1.5.43 51.11-rM UOCYRFT{ /YY+\ PLYLf I •S.•S Y Sp ).1 OC/20/N 52S.Y0 SUT-t.UFUS -If SENT twit At -OVAL )<S.YY . u 56116 f2R•/N 2.NL•• T..YNP1 DIST CY 91f. PY.C. Y 5.1Tt 12/tf/N 2l.•w I. 't DIST CY •VI Na I 2.1•f.1Y .o u• ( HNI1 tali{/" 3.1.9.YU TY.CI UIL CO l<SUL iFi VS.TT• •2/101N Dw.)• 1--Cl UIL CU U11LITt(A a.{Ia.l. . ( N•fMN •.N 1 "CI' AN. .N. . P.Y. • �•+•q •1.•N 1-w.•1S Y 1•. Stl`I1.•U •1NNI'u •1-•1 11•••la•al a•.• ll-NIlN la-0Y Y 1••t1A'1•.•JI Y 1•N 1.-Ih-)I •1-2N.'R.r•Y• Y 1-aJ)1 YN-•t A1-.NL-Ie•-)1 i 1-UIYta.-•[ n-•• n-a 1 s-.A I1-q LHiS-q 01 .12..••r1N1 I •.•N••a•••If I9.A ITT OF ONUMY ` C➢LCR NO. ULTE • ouu • -Ise 421201G6 -7.2 0i120/Me • 9S6196 02/20/66 Y501Ye 02120/96 Y56.-. p2/20166 1,56TN .2120/60 � M %� e0. ozl2v6. IF p'<SN of/20166 u Sb9VY 02/20/66 V use Y03 02/20/oe user". 02/26/8b • V 169Y5 YC/20/66 AN Y5640e 02120/E6 • V5690I 021201o0 4Se901 021201be • Y569V6 02/20/06 AN V5.9Yu 0212o/eY AN V1b910 02,2018. . e5b91V 02,20/0. 15691Y 02,2016. 050914 02/20/60 vs.YIY oe"0166 AMOUNT 5.50 ]..a b.99 A 1.408.25 9S6,10 /31.00 79.90 1.22Y.e5 A 121.G! 433.15 03.53 TO.GV 74.00 225.09 225.u4 /S.YV 15.00 2D4.44 2.0.Ou 5.165.OY 51165.00 A I.t.00 2Le.A9 q90O,AV ,0Y 90.V9 . 55.04 55.0. . 3.421.04 9U.U0 9.173.00 9.110.0. I.S26.00 CMCCM st GISTEN YENOUM 14N OESCRIFTION .e-L.-N FAsf e ACCOUNT M. IN,. A .,Y. • r: pest ... -CAN TYML ZTY /NArR TURN Y KNOOL/ YI-A IS6•IZ9-ll TVMC ITa/NAGa NILt A6t 61H111-BZ9-ll UNIFORMS UNLIMITED CLYIMIK e1-4ZZI-IZI.31 UNIFORMS UML IMIIEO CLOfol" Y1-KZ1-IZ6-JI UNIFUNMI aft LITER CW1.IK 61-962'-144-11 UNIFORM6 UNLIMITED taY/M PIS ACCESS V1-92T-.I20-11 ..LIE DEAN AMI.p CU ANIMAL L.YE OIH16E-I6 S•)S ."ITL DEAN ANIMAL LV 1-1-AL MATNUL 61-6HI-1 A' y Ab.YUCIATLO GAL CU t.UM/F131ILCESI TI-biii-S1Y60 ENNESI J LEAK RMAR .NI bLU b 969 91-eul-pb9-I/ NAIL FIDE MSOTEETION MP.C.SMp 61-4169-1IMJ3 SLATE Of NN sTb L ME %.1 016L F 'F BIH)L2-12Y-31 THIN CITY SCALE ot.tN EGUIF .IHSb O.129-]I TOTAL TOOL OTNtN EbUIs T2-9560-SA9-91 TOTAL IDOL OTMN ENT• 11-♦H wSa u-92 Ntbis TMAR UM of MM CORA A SCHOOLS u1-43U-639.12 NATZATA COUNTRY CLUB rf0 FAAA-C[RI TO CT\ Oi •INMGYO-YG LMCIT C/O bU SON GAM LI NILITT 01-6371-Ls.-12 'NC IT CIO N4 STAN GLN LIABILITY VI•af TV-Y69-11 L.0 IT C/O NU STAR GAM LIABILITY YIH 3TY-![9.]I LAC IT CIU NO STAR LAN LIABILITY VI -A st O.2 N-A2 LK IT CIO NO blAr GLM L/!MILT t Ol•9 ]IY•IwM9i ... K AN ...-CAN .... CBS I466 L11T 6f UYUkD CHIC. Mtlls\EM rt-n•61 PA.t 9 C.tl. NU. &Ali AAOUHT 9ENYUk ITEM 9&bCklFlly% ACCOUNT W. 16t. [ F.Y. a PLIA.YL .16914 02/20/6b 964.00 LuCIT C/O f111 9144 AUTO LI-61LIll 01•4174-019-11 U5.410 62/dY/N 15.vt LRLIT C/O W STAN Awl. LIAIIUTT 01-t)Ia.rN-ti w5.91v v2/20/6b 3.124•0. LRCII C/O MD STAN AUTO 11.61,11\ YI-•)1.•1H-31 us.V10 0[/9v/0. 2,.00.9V l-KIT CIO HO STAY AU IJ LIMIILII\ VI-HiMpV.9t VSe9L0 01/90,00 )5.00 LRCIT CIO ftl, STAN Awl. 1IPSIl11T 61.W o-i3`b.11 VS6910 6t/20/66 000.0v L"CiT C/O NO ITPS UkkkELL• LIPS YI-.171"JI-I1 056010 Y2/20/01 90Y.Va LHCIT C/O klf STAR 00SAall. LIAM 01-4177-Vsv-1S 050410 02/29/46 4,500.00 LICIT CIO b0 STAR ~9LLA LIAO 01•4177-129-11 v50410 911isl Ib 5,250.0. LNG I1 C/O My STAY UMONLLLt LIAO 11-4371-8i9-41 056010 94/2V/66 9.0.00 LNLIT C/O NO {TAR ~ULA LIAO 61.4117-296.61 US6910 02/20/PS 3,331.V0 LACIT CIO HO {TAR SN LIAOILITT 11.U/Y-51s•te w5b V1J 02/90/66 35.U0 LRCIT CIO W STAR AVID LSASILITV /1-4374-51s-VI VS0910 v2/20A0 3.07[.60 L.CIT CIO W STAN Ytb LIPS0.ITT 1l.13/i-l9 Ntl 956910 .02/29/60 572.b0 LKIT CIO kY {law WV LIAOILITS V56VIJ 92/20Ibb 600,V. LRCIT CIO W {TAR UA6N(6LA LIAO l2 N )1T-H9.91 4569lo 02/20/6b I,bV9.2. LMCIT CIO NIf SIN 6Lb LAA.SLITT /3-1316•HN9/ u S.91U 04/20/00 061.Lv LAC 31 CIO W STAR AUTO LIMILITT /3-4370-56Y-t! .591. 02/20/se ♦UO.VO LAC IT C/O k0 514A UMON(LLt LIPS ?3.4371-549-92 vb091r 02/20/0b 61195.00 LAC IT CIO kD STAR YN LIPSSLiTV 74-4370-59N93 .56910 02/20/H 35.00 LICIT C/O W ST•'. A014 11LOILITT H-931Nst6-tl V5a919 V2/20/PS 1.950.0v LMCIT Cf. f.Y {TAN UN6-L"A LIAS 79-4377-S99-91 65,619.00 ...... ....... .Clete 02/%:0/S6 65.74 DUALITT •Ik! Mlet PUNCH 1t-PS1:-s1s•n P0", .U61e 62/20/e4, 1.61. iJALITY RINE blka 011 it-PSIY>. N.V ..1u.L A2..1 .....• ....... .C1b20 02/2S/66 160.33 JUMM30. skOS MINA PUNCH 71-1612-sit-00 '..UAL M0b2U 09,20,66 1.>1- JOHNSON S.Ua MLbt UIb 11-PSI I•SIS-91 ..NUA. IS0.7b MC1621 02/t0/6b 20.Y0 MJM1 CAN 1 FIN Off LICE TAN 01-1363-V)t-12 •..... 2U.vV .C7.2t 99/20/66 40.6V HCNM C/l CHIEFS CUN1 6 sCH00lS 91-4351-920-11 n1UAa a9.UV HC7b23 02/2016b 3S5.12 ED PHILLIPS RINI FY-CH 71-0612-Sq-99 •a.UAI MClbe3 01/20/06 ..09. LJ F-ILL104 ..ba Olt 71-1612.%1 YVO ••n dL .0be3 02/20/s6 19..0 NO PHILLIPS StEO PUNCH )1-9015•S1>-•0 w.nuu 400.03 .0621 02/2914. 2s9.61 D.U.f.k,b.b. NET DIV FICA 1/1/-2/4/e6 01-•{Q-0 H•It wu v.`L .CI62• 02/iu/eb $.21 D.v.E.N.b.6, Rev DIV FICA 1/.7-2/9/6. 61-01.1-040-13 HAW,, .C1sA 42,2016. 4,79 D.6.E.4.5.3.MET DIY F.CA IK7-t/9ne N-•11t-4S9.1• NA.UAL .E7b24 82,20,06 111.13 D.O.L.Y.6.S.RET DIY FICA 1/27.210,66 01-111t-!69.13 .I6.1. .Glee. 6t/20I66 17.01 O.Y.C.k,6,{.YET DIV FICA 1/[7.2/9/1Y 61-11.2-YN-II .41.1. HC1014 U2/20/06 03..1 O.U,E,R.b,6,REt DIV FICA 1/a/-2/9/A. 01-4142-11s-3I Mtbull .0.2. 02/20/66 29s.0a U.O,f ,H,S.b.MLT DIV f.C• 1/27-1/9/6s 01••I PS•1/•-H -A.." .CT.2. 02/20/66 411.36 u.0,E.0.6.6,41T DIV FICA 1/17-2Iola. 01-0Nt-2•i-•2 .ak0" .C769. Gat"I66 $1.90 O.D,t.0,0,2.4ET DIV FICA 1/17-1/vnb 61-t Hf•!0Y-H .Akw,, 141. CITY OF uMUMU .CIr2Y oe/e4/aY ncl.'. 0e•eY/]a -0a2. 0,12016. ncl... L2/CO/Oo .r74[4 Y2/e.,ab .L7p25 L21 eo/ae 4C1ae5 .2/e0/aY AMOUNT 1.60 51.11 63.42 154.)4 44.16 i. GG2. T4 268.34 5.53- 2A2.N A G1.4DS.51 SG2.p5 0.00 21, 5N.1 i 4.176.49 21.Sol.5u 9.819.63 145,4154. 14 LMECR .EMi3TEN FENOeR lit. NEfCNIFTIN D.11A.010.G..ET I;i. FICA D.u.E.R.S.f.R[T OIV FICA 1/[/-2/R/N D.u.E,R.f,f,RET DIV FICA 1/414/4/N D.U.E.R.p.3..ET Div FICA 1/i1-2H/4N 0.u,C,R.f.3,RE1 014 FICA 1/11-G/4/44 EAGLL DIST LIE RURCM EAGLE DIST LIO 016 FUMO 01 TOTAL StMLN4L FORD FJND 14 TOTAL IMF-4VE G LOUIP OUTLAT I FOND 41 AVAIL FA" IMPROVE REYULNNN I FUMY 11 TOTAL LINNOM uPERATIN6 FUR, PUMP T2 TOTAL AA TLA OPERATING TO" 'ONO 15 TOTAL 4L4ER OPERATING FUND FUND 14 TOTAL GYLI COURSE UPENATINL It, TOTAL p<•N-44 PAIL IF [CCYJ4I 4e. 1rY. A R.N. [ u[>iALC 41 wlAi•40 a-Yp proµ II-[112•]1]•VY AANW4 11-44Y2'Seiw< r1ruAL n-4au-vl-4p ruuu T I•NIIY•]-.o PAAUAI PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO (IC AA 11 C•(I MEETING DATE l PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 1 N � )0a ! t S /voi.t,- >ticq r. IZComm. 9. 0. 1. I. 3. 6. S. _ 6. 7. 9. '0 . I nfo In &+ forl IE vo% s camn <i (Ac" �OUMCIi �t IINli FEB 2 n 1986 :ITV uF ORuNo DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY Rfl A-1603 Governmeni Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0163 HENNEPIN 612-348-6846 FM -.51, February 4, 1986 - G—Q(�( John Gerhardson, Compost Coordinator P. 0. Box 66 C•ystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Gerhardson: Attached is a copy of the '1986 Free Leaf Compost" brochure. Nearly 4,000 brochures were given away du ing the How and Garden Shoo in Minneapolis (January 31, 1986 through February 4, 1986). Several thousand brochures will be mailed to those on the Department of Environment and Erergy's moiling list. Among those on this list are: environmental and public interest groups; community and neighborhood groups; newspapers; recyclers; lawn services and landscapers; and cities and park boards. Inter this month, we will deliver your city's supply of brochures to your City Mall. In lition, if your city is new to the program, the "Free Compost" sign will also tl� 'elivered. The "Free Compost" sign you have (or will be receiving), should be erected at the compost distribution location(s) in mid -March. This will allow enough time for the County to schedule and deliver the compost prior to the beginning of the program in April. If you have my questions, do not hesitate to contact me at 348-4157. Sircerel All Mark S. Banwart Planner enclosure FSB: tra ExT HENNEPIN COUNTY on equal oppo,%n"y fmplaye, +� ; ; inrreforrlt+ +hle Cvmmunicaflorl:a Cominission 4430A!C ST III •IKULS1011. MIN NESOT A 51,331• W171 A i I Y,rl TO: LAKE MINNETONKA CAUI.f C0Id4ISSION rROM: HOLLY HANSEN, ADIIIIIl'•IRATOR UATE: FEBRUARY 12, 1986 RE: UIICUIIING FULL C011t15'1O11 MEET114G %4 ----J lire next meetiinacel of the�L.IL(,C will be a full Commission meetin . This meeting iRI to e p on Tuesday. a ruaril-1 y Bch at f:00 p.m. at tie xcelsior Commun- Ity TV Studio. The studio Is located in roan 102 of the Excelsior Community remiter at the intersection ,f Highway 7 and County Road 19. Please contact me before 5:110 p.m, or Monday, February I;th if you are unable to attend the Meeting. If ore are unable to reach a quorum by noon on the day of the meeting. I will conlict your City Manager to advise them of a cancellation. You ma) also call me to confirm the status of the meeting. Please mate every effort t,� attend this meeting as we will establish a Nomi- nating Committee for electihml of Officers at the next full Commission meeting in May. Feel free to contact me if i,.0 have any questions. Sincerel,. Holly Ilansen Administrator fncl LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COIMIISSION FULL COMMISSION MEETING 5:00 P.M. Excelsior Community Center Community TV Studio R G E N 0 A 1. CALL TO ORDER 11. APPROV?.: OF MINUTES Ill. REPORTS A. Officers B. Admiristrator C. Legal Counsel D. Dow -Sat IV. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEL VACANCY V. 140MINATING COMMITTEE VI. EQUIPMENT AND STUDIO REVIEW VII. BOND REDUCTION REQUEST VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS IX. NEW BUSINESS X. ADJOURN MINUTES OF LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING January 22, 1986 5:00 p.m. Excelsior Community TV Studio I. CALL TO ORDER e meeting et ng was called to order at 5:05 p.m. by Chair Jim Olds. Directors Present Chair Jim Olds Vice Chair Dennis Haggerty Treasurer Frank deMonchaux Secretary Andrea Bassett Bob Gagne Anthony Pini 11. APPROVAL CF MINUTES Others Present Administrator Holly Hansen Legal Counsel Mark Ayotte Notion 1.22.86.1 To approve the minutes of the 12/17/85 Executive Committee etet neFTngg.M%L%n by Gagne, seconded by deMonchaux. Vote: Unanimous. III. REPORTS A. Officers reT asurer deMonchaux proposed that the Administrator be authorized as a co-signer on the checking account for convenience in paying bills. Counsel Ayotte said according to the By -Laws, checks must be signed by the Chair or Vice Chair and Treasurer or Assistant Treasurer. Motion 1.22.86.2 To appoint the Administrator as Assistant Treasurer in a non -voting capacity and be one of two signatures on checks, subject to compliance with the Joint Powers Agreement. Motion by deMonchaux, seconded by Gagne. Vote: Unanimous. deMonchaux suggested that monies not needed in the checking account be placed in a liquid, fully guaranteed, higher yielding instrument in keeping with the best interests of the Commission and that reports be made to the Cc mission to keep them informed. He and Hansen had met with Mary Smith at Dow -Sat to work out a monthly reporting format from Dow -Sat. Chair Olds said we had received a check from Dow -Sat for $24.941.24 and that the final payment of Franchise Fees for $10.000 would be due before the end of January per the pre -payment agreement with Dow Vice -Chair Haggerty said he enjoyed the Studio Opt. louse but noted that Commission member attendance was low. It was reconmendei that the Adminis- trator write the City Managers concerning reappointments to the LMCCC for 1986. B. Le al Counsel yotte presented the attorney bill for 2/l/85 - 1/5/86 in the amount of $761:,.4�. The Executive Committee requested that the Commission be billed on a bi-monthly basis in the future which should be easier with the attorneys new computer system. Motion 1.22.86.3 To pay the attorney bill pending review by the Treasurer. Motion by Lagne, seconded by Haggerty. Vote: Unanimous. -1- C. Administrator anseF� n reported that she had received an estimate on insurance from T.C. Field 6 Co. through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust for an annual premium of $3,131.00. The agent had cffered a "package deal" which included Public Officials Liability, General Liability, and Non -Owned Auto- mobiles, which exceeds the needs of the LMCCC. Hansen said she would reserach the matter and try to find a better offer. Two items were presented for pay- ment: Voss Electric for $66.20 and Fidelity Bond Insurance premium for approximately $230.00. Motion 1.22.86.4 To pay the above bills, with the Fidelity Bond not to excee U. motion by Gagne, seconded by Pini. Vote: Unanimous. Hansen requested approval to hire a secretary to record and prepare the monthly minutes . Motion 1.22.86.5 To authorize the Administrator to hire a secretary on a nor.-empTyee basis and to be contracted for not more than $60.00/month. Motion by OeMonchaux, seconded by Gagne. Vote: Unanimous. Under Access Promotion, Hansen said the Open House was successful with approximately 30 guests attending, two mini -field workshops were offered in January to Community Organizations with approximately 22 participants, a 4 session class on field, editing and studio production was given to 12 Minnetonka High School students, and a Community Ed class began with 13 students who will produce a magazine show for Channel 20. An intern began at the Excelsior studio in January who was knowledgable in video production and he would be working approximately 30 hours/week until the end of March. Hansen had also begun work on planning a monthly goverment show that would be information oriented and use a magazine -type format. IV. LONG RANGE AND SHORT RANGE PLANS Chair Olds said it appeared that Short Term Plans seem^d to be falling in place of their own accord. Discussion of Long Range Plans included a Non - Profit Access Corporation and what purpose this would serve. Access promotion, equipment and staffing for Orono and Excelsior studios, and a fee for classes and/or production assistance were also discussed. The Executive Committee decided tc schedule meetings on the third Tuesday of the month as there were too many conflicts on Wednesdays. The next full Commission meeting was scheduled for Tuesday. February 18th at 5:00 p.m. A Nominating Committee will be placed on the February Agenda and election of Officers will take plat- at the May meeting. V. NEW BUSINESS Hansen said she had been appointed to the Board of Directors for MACTA (Minnesota Association of Cable Television Administrators). Anthony Pini announced that he would be resigning from the LMCCC. The Executive Committee expressed their appreciation for his three years of work on the LMCCC. VI. ADJOURN Motion 1.2; _ .,.6 To adjourn the meetinq. Motion by Pini, seconded by e ncnaux. Vo e: Unanimous. The meeting was adjourned at 7:10 p.m. -2- City, county park boards opt i *jr self-insuram J M,Oft 8511 year It paid SNAN In, Mu :,meeit to one ,or h a 15 mllllan posts, -Tee rm are /1a1.%a to gagl i0a lea lay, gain$ out M f►* world:am Harlan Alas Erickson, dtreram of fta . Symmon, ST. Loeb Parks nail dlrechr, Is a The League M Orin him b^ an Inmrom'r peel rise ell of Mb ■Iruumoc• premiums IT FdMis asks IT s55 rates. Aadbef 100 have climbed fr. about $141 M to efprctrd to into Tar meafA. A s 1M1 to moo min gW0.000 In 1065. lac pool offerer Try !se Aaaxlav- fold Cell Snitt a M 10 the city mainew be can$ Was ea M aL mesegeraotdsalcausda my task [ISMII and Reidy Feral Staff Writer, The d1mcto11 of lira IOcal park rye items took step, Thursday 0n hecuna self Insured min Odra pay styract- eling pfertll.na foe llablilty lusur- arKe. The Mlnnewpolls Park and Recm- tlap Poerd em the Suburban Hems pin Regional Part District would Imo a growing number of govem- CImMut rd from page lB ■Starting Mr. year, low-income pub- W housing iMla In Minneapolis will nu longer rave liability Imurance covrrog Injury and property clams. reared. claim will be field nut of a 5250.000 fund the Minneapolis Com- mpnlly Development Agency has da tided to establish. 71re'Mlnneapotb Perk Board voted yeterdav to become "it -insured am -lit up Its own $501,000 fund to paF<latma rather than c<ntlnue to pay Imunnte premluma. 'WRat Is happening Is not just local, It's a natural problem.' mid Del Greeil part board secretary and Its aaltant superintendent for admlNr tratlon. "Public liability from an In- surance standpoint In In a crbng Mtu- alion" men'� olla amou' me country Mat have chosen felt4wh rker" a me rag of hablllty coverage became too espe"A or. In lane cafe, Irte Pagans, to obtain. 'The tale Increases art rained -In part by cyclical change In the pro- PartyIm ity Imuslry, watch Is Try Ing to recover from recent lowers, An$ a re it local governments M M one WW am anund the emintfy, arc sec Ing piety um Increase of Ion. 300 ,and fresh 500 percent. To seer one". funny larger Pcrr, internal using am rrmldn$ toward self- Imuraote, while amfller 0. art forming Drab to Prmecl theme m aghtaat 0mlzrry am prearm I Rnbil- +y claim Some etampirs Of me pr lone are. ■ St. Lools Pon bought a al million catastrophic Insurance paltry for an-noklyn Pan, toad reptitme laalfaoe eannnueA on pap 4R mid vesterday that Home Insurano companies are w thdravu,A Isom weenies, stud that na a %mall ls "ptung out of the bucmesof some of soon arena and IV- hems ' 'Our history t that It caned nap resonance for munitlpallfles" that refualn are asking premium In pen.' M l'd. creases that may be several limn The Hennepin pert ryMemi 15 mll• previous rote. Because mov sac nalla When the Ports II•Nn- lion liability policy wam-1 renewed clalty Ilne are handled by only a Iriani kin" averaged snout IT U.000 this year, either, am only owe coml few mmpanln. Troyer, often find a vnr for Ike pa fr" years, acres pony offered a quote. old Gre themselves with fee ailernatires. old. Typical Injury chums are for Mack, director of menngemenl Ie - - - -- fella bralwa scrisped knees am bra. vices `SITr'I.111. nce. which esscnitauv ken films. vMin -result pours am means no Insurance. ball pearl off for Irranvenlame W the claimant." mid That Ounte. 5SOO.000 In coverage larger governmental units like Min- Rtcum Thep Pert burro (Ir with a 1125,000 dmutllble, was 50 neapolls, St Paul, and Ram:ry and manager. The Incident, might be percent higher than 1st year s. The Hennepin counue caused by a crack In a fontpm as, part system has had only one claim hlrvcle pal 1, or m Improperly mein over $25.000 In Its btaory. Mac' Hennepin County, which has ta1nM pier of plonl nd imp mid. The "em opened In 1951 peen self-Imured. mainmW a it meat he nld. Rather than py me higher premium for Ina cmerage. the part system took tap yesterday to become self - Inspired. A $175,000 fund till he used to pay clalma Mack lad. Sharply higher Wurance rate and The Port Board am told two month red,;i!!ut is coverage have mulfl- ago by Home Insurance Co. Mal its piled recently an the Insurance in public liability Insurance would but dustry We to recover from the br renewed. Green mid. The cost of worst underwriting hale In Ito hlitn me Ihsurance In 1995 win 13m.000. ry•. They were caused by drasur rate Strriflaf coverage this year would cuts as companies sought money to eel about $825.0m. officials min . invert at the nigh Interest ales of ch ently 1990a. Roam Raraieboom nice r:msldm ---�� of American Busmal irwrance Bryers oI Specialty line of love.Me agent who handled the Name nice. like governmental umb, face les{rooce policy for the Part Board, even works, problems. losurence million fund 10 pay claims In es worst year me county paid S500.000. Last year claims were under 8100.000 Dennla Dokarty county flat nmw&s r, ern ft mat an in- surance company would charge Inv. real million dollar, to IM ire the county Then arc rots, trough. In Mlnneso- la, governments are liable for a maa- Imum of W00.000 for any smrle Incl- dent but a M:'Ing of Inclaemr could add up W a calatrophlc year for any self -in urance pool. if mat happens. gmemmenng arc permitted to Irvy additional %%in To pv ape NC.mr In the mM: Nippon" ere.. !he emerel muntin are hand) .a Ine ms_raoce problem In different we" Watlblgtm county ar poised the co-mliea EWe1f11ni1 Pont wal:r ,�cwf County of pitying sr, tuner more tar +. policy wits em coverage Carver Ca,mly ofru.ale are Yading to hewr from an IamMr , company ahrat proem ,nd alra are ... sw.r- Ing The pool. Amha and Dakota COYMI S fee era4deMg nllioWf grace. Mf c" lid. claim. The larurentt pale make a9manaw less Towns for ct" and counties. Green me Minneapolis Park Mard and eugnMae arailanilty out T. the 10.8 ran. if the M'iN —mtnc- Mid go.era ft liable for M kinds of damage or tflary, lee or takfol. Pooh Me be delve, as well. acrmdln, In P.0 51raa1 the MmneseM Imumnce Infor f oO ironer "My gees T. !hat M area l me am roan:ies, am you er J p My include school dttelet. v.' ar love liability eJgewre Lid ro• lie to he tamed as defendant bra in, mnT mere will be a nee' In, mc•e> In hfMidy beerr anem-r IT • ham ae. I,wirael'e pain. m !sr^Ygh is, knave of r or cot Ins pool:' ",sa s•.'d Pe mid a dermas M the Mon. Court of Appeals A Oro" no Amd. County Lade for the fur. suffered by too harks as A &I - tenter licensed M no, cbYy ^ e.amptr or the new ryy of •.-o courea rs. continue TO align ro erroneous •'At Ire, as "" fast 're, - MnW1 m rt4 Y^u wla rare q in prerm Lin.' Straw•, slid full trtrM ►all, Lrey„U Blake wad J. BIN• eaaWM. Ike rrpwrt. LEADING THE WEEK �yag�essional olldooh % ingress No consider slate of cable issues at ION —The 99th Congr,. rtvunrennl here last Tuesday Iw wh:n man, Capitol Iltll ob"rvern pl idol .,If hr , lomallunus election year a, and Y•.siraa, with some fireworks likely in cehlrrehrn•d mean, complememuor the more visible excttemenl surroa d ins such issues as the budget, lam u b.rn. aul t. dr. In thy (base of Itepre,nl nl itrv. sal ellit, wrombling end a re,xomiu i Iwn of IM restrictions placed on brit phone twnpagv data services will I-, the hottest lable-related topic. -nurses said. Cable copyright and ma.ts•erp' are dw expected to grit At, •ahstontbd intrm.t an the Hill. 'I'M Srmme, mramwhil, is pne rd Ire open its thani to ga,rhlo-gmwl r:e rim and tele%i.imt coverage early obi. ,car. and rill also modify and rr, i,, the lh,am, yer,om of eomprrhetim". tax mlmn. pseud let* lest yexr. Ulk the House. the Senate is [an exprfe+l to closely exnnnne Brambling. c.W.• crept right :mil ... rM yer, , during lux: '11s, Ilm w. b leromnu .nireltuu. •.ale ,aumita, ' , rslNrled to have an :. tor• ve:n, •purn,l to mate degre, be Ihr dtrr.itm of Too Wirth 1114'aln l o. nlrl for IM Vi,nattr Mat lain rM... qn-•.M,1 b, 0,Iio.%k, Ilemcr.l G,m Ilan. S,..nr.. sp.caloled lhet ".Inn rd ,..k"nx tormg mmmhrn.' for nhr ndrrammatrw fhear will lr.ndnls inn• Incrr:r.ed mir,,t in trleommom ,at... uv.. And .ulh Vat trill , Sin air eemp:ugn Rranng up late Linn yam. royt t .o.... errs repast the teh.rm. rWONal..., .aNm11mHIR Ir• deb• minr.hlr rrimed .ue, early on "olh Iris d,tsdv nnno,mrsd Ihm In. saM.mrmete• will hold he irmar rm .r r.mldae rm M:vth G. feel air ... g "I h, lne M in, i, of rite rrler.. l jntni' rid ..o gets •. rh.I ,ran,l I,, tl• ,J. rmralNl N. Sreanhlmx. flat' ,el his goaii inl., h.- "real e I hr ... r.r.rd..vl IN anon• ..a, se Laelmo.m t"Mt., ad b, Kep. I..ratg. It N H which .rakl mrpr.. l.n,e.e I .ism roan rm orerdo,, all .I.11 q etm.r.l b. Rep. Ihll, 1 .a Ill , .h.h wk. ter ,aer., Is..r doh r.o-+. M.r �. .. to ... • •nd.h.l-rxnals • a Irart.bo r.m.isao. &.I II.,. . in offering information services 'will be a major iswd• in 1988, llog,rs pre. dieted. The loose telecommunivalions subcommittee has scheduled a hearing far Feb. 27 to consider easing the re, sanctions on telcoprovided informs. lion services. The issue in that hearing likely will he defining the line Iwlwern inform&inn services and electronic publishing. since the Consent Dectee governing the break up of AT&T ex pr... ly proh;4n, the Hell l.,sting companies from F�oviding elmtronic publishing services. The ldeommunicaGon. and, ommit tee will likely take m hook al mam- carry. but not until the Fedoral Con,- munic.uons Commis.ion has con- cluded its muxbcarry proceeding. lingers said. The subcommittee may also revisit fide attachment in the vake nl t he 1 I th Circuit Appeals Court derision Invalidating the 1978 Pole At- tathment Art—Wirth•s first major piece of I elecommunica lions legial&. Lion. lief orn of the cable ropynght sco tam is slur expirued to be a mmitr issue in the llo a.e with many abwrvers pre darling that IM onetime negotiations hrlwt•en low ruble industry and rf:v sight ow nrr..dl lend to Irgixlalio, this ye*r.'I h at leapelxl ion would taclon in the Muse Judiciary ruminative pans] with cops right jurisdiction Cable copyright legisl&rom may slut M linked to reform of the C'npy right Roydly I iboral. which set. the roles cable operator, pay la rrtrersmil hmmh�ast signals. 11. tutu, of IM CRT .vy thrown mitt doubt early lost %ear. %hen ('ItI Chairman M.,one, )fall %as forted In resign under Ins Last Nrdr.esday. IM np\ri,hl soil nmmultee awl In mark up legrdnllon le rnaLle rNLle npa.l.lr. In carp' low. frr.rr Ivlec..orn telron. wah,xat par Scrambling 'h turned into the premier consumer electronics issue.' ins distant signal royally Peen. That h•gishitlon, introduced by .ubraminib Ier chairman Itnbcd Kastenmeie, D. Wia.. no expeael W pass without sub- manlf rl opprattion. The subcommittee will alsm continue to examine the copor- Light implications of scrambling, one Paurca•said. For the Senate, the first month of the second session could mean the ad vent of television and radio coverage nt Renato proceedings. Senate Majority Lender Itobert boor. It Kan.. has prom tad to bring up for vote legislation which would open the Senate chamber to the electronic media. The Scal will vote on Senate helm loon. 28. which would provide for a test o Loth radio and television cover- age. The radio feed would be available to the media immediately, while brood- ,..t roger^.Kr would be tested in boom-. After the test, the Senate would then rote on x farther to continue cove erase. The Senme i, also expected to tie vote considerable attention to the Houprpassed version of comp,hem live lax reform legislation. a bill genes ally considered &river" to capital in tvnxive industries such as cable. Th, NCTA has indicated that it will lobby the Senate in an effort W modify provi. .ions of the Movie passed hill consid- card unfovorddr nr cable, such it, the rr J.-al of the i ,,v1 meat tax credit end the exlennton of the depreciation pi, rirsl. I'he Srnot communications %oil- 1.1ilool I, I. exfncred ill ke•tl art r,r r,it wcnmbling. but nor hearings hair ,et her. scheduled. a subcommittee able Pro& 9rn. Albert Gore. U"Iron.. has inn nNturel legislation which ctald lend to FCC regulation of u. rambfvd prrgremmbng pricing The communism turns subcommittee will &I. momitor onset rare\ hut. like the Ilua". tx ex pe,ied la wad until if, FCC her c,,m plrted ia. nm.t, cry prceediug Iw fore launching any formal aaquiry into t M i..ur• 'low, Senate c,pl right o lcommater .,If dux re, ov. any .prormse am r. blr• egrer.,Lh( rrhxnr. 'Thal pawl slur moo rnnbrm .., Whale Hon, an pnnlmrntr to IM 1'ItT, which aWl ha. 1wn,nr awn•.. Nvxtoter pan s] al Irish usmtr a., I her rxfarte tri hire a high proldr..... In 1 e ....scu't dories R l selhmgro. w1- .um '1'M Smarr IhIM. 1'ommmn u ;.v rr Nllt inn ndrrmx Irsadssou .;n17n Ihnl wrNahl ban "m'pNnr. INt Io. at ads rm b b%wnn BMI cOrh• .nap.. arm hill ha. I., Inn curia. r I at IM L.A. ❑— Voicnii iires sca at HBO', VCR c imnaign NEW Y411K-111111 came under fire from the ulldion picture industry last week for n ,crinly mulched market. ing carnpnq:n that ...vines VCH Own. all W hook up to the network and "start roar own video libtaq•." Speaking last week an CNN's eve ailing talkahow Larry King Lope, Mo- than 1'iatnre Association of America President .lack Valenti -aid the cam. paign was "cannil liatw' and "un- wise," asserting that such practices would event unity have a negative im. pact on fibs output, as movie theaters loan ground to the bame-video Indus. try. "Theh're Iesaening the ealue of the navies Ont. show:" V.Irmt said of the H80canryaign. "Ill movies that gem rate and fnrl the Velocity of HBO. If that a dn.9ine in the number of mov bee being made. it a bound to offset the future oI 11IM. You re devouring your own ynunl; when -too promote vome- thing life that." A wni.It I III() official, responding to Valenti s enurlm. issued the following edtemene It is a known fact that an increasing Iumler of pq•television suMcrioers o .e alau purchasing VCRs. These suhsc, doers are aware that VCRs Lobito" the ,aloe of their pay ser n, anal likevrivsubscription to pay am iris mnhrs It C'Its more useful. H8Ob t'CR prograul promotes toe eompetiLliity of VCRs and table in a t•Onlinping eff tat in remain responsive to Our sub•criberr, '«sires far more VNwbng'Ii i",v.' HBOy cmnpnign, w'I,i,h joins a host of similnr rflnrts prepared and distri4 uted by cable operators last year. tekn a multi lmebvl approach. It in dudes an nd,oadon:d hoeoklet for op stators listing at in which pny can be sold to VCR ownrn. a consumer oriented hra.'hure which can he used far dire I mail tar as a hilietuffer and a net of al.h, k, for heal me.ba far use by ape, nor. One of the .amply ads advises I:nm sumws to"Record HBO BO and cable pro graves with your V('R and you'll +are what you want. when pm want. Or start year own Vok•n library' You It have to free any muse travel hesdrM'. or ,ut of to,k hi .pfxont mente p I In . i.hs�.bm• .. J14M Ibihs k. Hill, wvu..r liar press draw. awed Ih« rno,ploa. had been .parked In •lab ant ice Ihm slow that nearly 'yl Iv tat .f ..d,l« subs nor owo VC11 • Hblll of v('It orates n'• •d.x Ir-1 tlanr ,I.hmes enkasv. I'- p.«eoam .«nor• Mot aeW '.alp.. noel •nl..rnlxr ,onto bit In Vl'K.. ared 11,11 col IM' ."+matt is de .."ed b .. I«da . is, ar.. uNl ran caner. 1 1". "1, ,..,tdrlr hnkn" 10 '' t i h" market has been telling us Ira It., months that cable and VCIl.. 1--1' ynergisticand eompal- ibl¢" 1�01rrk noted. "But technical probh•r, involving equipment like A B swil- Ir are very confusing to con. sumel Y Billeae added that a fourth element to they 11411aign, involving on -air spots highlbr Bring the compatibility of VCR. • nh HBO and Cinemax, would begin he two services next month. He sell] , he campaign was being timed to coin idn with the estimated sale of smile I million VCH. ovet the holidays. HIM s informational booklet for op Oratorprepared with the assistance of Gh•n I'riLd,,n. corporate manager for car....er service at American Tele vision ,,oh Communications Corp.. notes 11 t the Supreme Court's w celled:,tamax decision" has freed opera, m operd: promote home top - big. .Ism Ilourasvice president for home . J,o at the Motia, Picture As Introit••, of Am.. ,id Valenti did not no = I In imply' that HRO's promo- tion al h on, taping violated any legal etrfctm,..,, adding that the ruling. le goblin, home television taping. had not M.„ •pr,ific about the accumula. tin, of t-one movie libraries on tape. "The b. ,i twos is open," he said. et. Oxon!', I ,- adobvl that his orgerimminn numunb, 1 s viewed the campaign as and "appalling." —John Afw."Ili Disney posts record - breaking first Quarter results 11CHBA\K. Calif. —Walt Dbm,y pre ductionn reported that revenues and net income for the period ended Der. 31. 1914.5, were the highest first-quarter results in the company's history. Revs noes rase to 11604,153,000, an 18 par - cent increase from $426,530.000 for the period a year earlier. Net income for the quarter climbed 8 percent to $34.716,000, or $1.04 per share, com pored to d32,189.004), or 95 cents per share reported a year ego. In a joint statement. Michael Eisner, chairman and chief executive officer, and Frank Wells, president and chief operating officer. said the significant increase in Troth revenues and net Iry come was largely due to the strong showing at both Disneyland and Walt Onney World and improved perfor- mances in filmed entertainment.ctiri. ties. Operating income climbed 11 per cent to 996,664A00 from 686.8Ul Aoo in the gu:lrter a veer ago. Revenues for the fibnrd cntertaiamenl ra•gnent rase ''' I.'reout to 5125.702,000 for the first quurlor annpared to 578,233,0W in the prior year. Operating income im. pro' '1 49 percent to $22,949,000 com. pared to 515.374.08p is year ago. The Mimproved performance was largely at. t rrbuted to the domestic Chrisl.maa reissue of lal balmurim s, foreign svn. dicmion license agreements. higher boo video n•venues. and improved operating results from The Disney, channel. Wisconsin to launch statewide campaign MADISON. Win —'Cable TV —Port of the Good Life in Wisconsin" is the theme for a new marketing campaign which the Wisconsin Cable Communi- cation^ .Association has developed forcabk operators in that state. The statewide marketing effort, fea goring newspaper and radio advertise events, is "designed for both subscri. her acquisition and image building.' affording to WCCA Resident Ron Kuisis, vice president of corporate of. fair, for WAVE Cable in Milwaukee. -We want to let people know about the positive aspects of cable television and the contributions the cable industry mates W community life:' Kuisis said. WCCA has budgeted $15.000 for the campaign, which Kuisis expects will run throughout 1986. Advertising ma. terials were developed by Cable Can. cepta. a division of ArmstmnglStrufp Advertising to--asomkee. Individual cable operator ill be responsible for placing the ads in Iota newspapers or on radio. Kuisia said. Wisconsin operators will be intro dured to the campaign during a two- hour seminar on Jan. 27. during which they will receive free "campaign kits." These kits will include four newspaper ads, 30- and Wipeeond radio jingles. ends booklet with tips on ad place- ments. Kuhns expects that the limit ads will break next month, as many operators are readying their spring subscriber acquisition campaigns. The first of the newspaper ads fm- tures"Wisconsin Cable Television Fun Facts." a series of questions and an. swer, designed to familiarize consum- ers with cable. Sample questions in- clude: "W hen was the first cable televi. sion system built in Wisconsin? IAnswec 1951. in Rich Lakef' and "How many cable subscribers are there in Wisconsin? IAnswec. about 700.0001:' WCCA said it pimp W encourage to cal operators W develop their own "cal bk mivie' questions. The association a�gnea m nenp operators his.. coop funding from programmers Ii.e.. "Whet is the only cable channel ever endorsed by the Nation[ Education Association' Answer. NwIttledeonl. The second ad. "Working with Wio- consin Pride," will look "behind the scores" at people involved with cable. according to i.ucy Strupp. Cable Con- cepts president. The third ad positions cable ns a local business, highlighting thejobs provided by the industry. The final newspaper ad is designed (w subscriber acquisition, and can be "cusfomized with a system specific of. far:" Strupp said. Specific program- ming sen'ices can also be included. again with co-op funding in mind. The campaign's theme will be highlighted in all the ads. Strupp said. The radio jingle will be provided in three formata: a fill and 30-..nd "full sing" version and a 30-second "donut:' enabling operators W insert systemsperific information. Opera. tors will also receive emplovee buttons and a press kit. "This campaign will have a great deal of nexibdity built into it:" Kuisis said. noting that npermors con use whichever materials may be best suited far their individual markets. WCCA will monitor the distribution of the ad, to dctermtee the manner in which operate. s use the campaign. The WCCA will emphasise Its theme throughout the veer. and may elect to develop additional ads as the cam paign progress.,. Kuisis, ,aid. If opvr eta response is favorable, the cam psign may be continued the following year. Kuisis indicated. WCCA also plans to make its promo- Lima] material available to other inter tested parties. The Wisconsin chapter of Women In Cable. for example. is ex- pected to adopt the WCCA theme to i its own prom000na efforts. Kuisis said. — —John WofJe FNN Prola in, Prompted W for LDS ANGELF.S—Ffaanei.l d Firu Nave Nedrmrk, b.,.d by is fir pmfft far a tan d the l2aemlh Wow Period. said it will add a new FNN viewer-partiopstim 11" se, its wrhedukardwawwniseruober tim." .1w, a en of its count programs, Fug Therill-in promisa,"What'. E.mnng News?" will ma4 itsdobiaFh bm,kin 3 from 66:30pm. lZrion vw k- with live dale. Subscribers will pwtimma update' by calling a toff -tern 1ekpMnw n numb teannwrqu:riovamd for fnxn about general nmwpand brines happenings. Cilim with the our- 1Yi°etq ealy lnl rent masers will war a Price, FNNesid.7lrea'nwwinbelw. vk�r T7w ed by FNN'. R01 GriRrth. Indudedintheligdreaebd- mac Died, revamped programming is s FNN the"FNNMmnir,NriM.'TIw Profs ..iuoMr."Rren max, od national frstsn' end inarj ale io- mmrea e"' MetmrntndvaYeedrnaAmprow4 soden i ysr., according m network mfIii- rial.. TIM half-hour Program, akn berimning Frh 3, en b wb ertsms met st9n.m. IlwiR Msmeinar f>� national market reports form m London those day, each week, ed in a and from Japan two days per I the n week, unrding to FNN. FNN Jetworkoffirisl.e.idtb new mom "Wall Street Find" program, a wee-Mmr evening news w1cox, . _ parrot _ will fast. ,perm I. wwekly mMbm,verhdkrg Jim Gram, pad publwlnerolGrmr'shummerRau the arm Obse,er, Psd Suppasds, mtlror Nm. 30 and tax expert. CGm'e Sinclair, with a publielter, Syhdafbrre �ilbon- aom ore. and Ed Vlerwrh. edits. U.S. .wad . Robert Metz i. w mn- the chow'. chief axrt- t. FNN rid. y, the mwmp d "FNN News" will combine g barques news reports news reports and sprats FNN said last week. j ewe tekvyq will originate bash the eq main and wet of FNN, mnmedi- 1 bwingthanetwa"'.. peniripstion program. programming revisions sparked in pen by FNN'. vearA income Mark Ewen, am{rr vice president, r nvs p Damming. said. Tier .Iw reRem FNN'. bid to M VM--rahrp. he noted. ale nwpaw Imkuatfw W pwJeem.1 er eemipmfradrnal emenore N. we a, coming for myorr who's mrzslyd N m.mry or ie inremt- n unusual prospnniw on ewe:' he said. mid it reurhes about 20 C5. cable h.atwholds As pnevuudy,pored, the nerverk', man faaor teamed prof" of 1 m its ram re endy cvrm- qusnee brinking profit for Matta 12 mw�mhs end,d m 9435,"tar, compared lean d $6.8 million le the ramble 12-moah periol s year earlier. Response h the bar 12,nonth period. to $12.3 million from $7.2 million in the previous period. Lj ® Dow -Sat of Minnesota, fthlle Inc. 13 nse 2381 Mound, MN 55364 (612) 472-6394 MONTHLY REPORT (January, 1986) TO: Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission FM: Mary A. Smith DT: February 12, 1986 SUBSCRIBER ACTIVITY: No. of Community Homes Passed Basic Subs. Pay Services Tooke Bay 525 206 195 Minnetonka Beach 212 81 86 Excelsior 1168 501 377 Shorewood 1451 478 437 Spring Park 720 216 196 Orono 2027 641 688 Long Lake 684 287 240 Greenwood 256 90 81 Deephaven 1217 437 409 Woodland 152 37 30 Medina 246 65 58 Victoria 462 186 153 Minna trlsra 536 190 165 St. Bonlfactus 376 _153 154 Lake Mtka. Sys. Intel 10032 3568 '1269 Subscriber Activity Page 2 Marketing Advertising - Full page ad in the Minneapolis paper promoting Basic, Home Box Office and VC1. compatibility Aqulaition - Direct Mail - HBO poet card offering installation special and free clock radio Retention - same as above Upgrade - Direct Mail - same as above Remerket - same as above Current Promotion - 501 off on installation with a basic subscription with one Day - Free installation with a package - Free clock radio with HBO Technical Outages: None other than 2 suck outs due to cold weather Problems - None - Headend and line maintenance continues on a regular basis Customer Service Complaints: - property damage - none - account disputes - one outstanding whl.ch was referred to cable commission Public Access - See attached reports for Excelsior, Draw and Nestouka studios - Public access channel^ 8-19-20-21 - New formate were established for all fovt channels 1. A Lake area calendar will apfear on Channel 19 and events will be categorized and color coded. 2. The Henn. Co. Library events will appear on Channel 8 1. The Henn. Co. Park events will appear on Channel 8 a. Thare will be a schedule of city council Meting times for all communities on the How -Sat system. 5. To make adverttrAnx more inviting to local businesses the rate of a page ad has been changed to $10.00 on Channel 21. Public Access Continued Page 3 Excelsior Studio Description Month Total Cumulative Total certified - field 34 55 F certified - editing 20 27 certified - studio 9 9 Field equipment hours 33 58 Editing hours 36 77 Studio hours 9 9 Orono Studio Number of Certified Ueers: 25 Number of Portable Carvers Useage Hours: 71 Number of Editing Hours: 26 Yestonka Studios Number of certified users: 72 Number of playback hours: 80 Number of camera usage hours: 77 Number of studio usage hours: 11 Number of editing hours: 85 prograesing Sources - Approximately 502 of the programming is original coming mainly from the Yestonks and Orono studios it this point. - The other 50% is coming from sources as stated in Doe -Setts proposal to the Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission INTER OFFICE MEMO DATE: February 18, 1986 TO: Officer Mark Tomczyk FROM: Chief Mel Kilbo SUBJECT: Letter of Appreciation I received a call from Mr. Waller of 1960 Lakeview Road on 2/14/86. He wanted me to know how much he appreciated what you did for him on 2/13/86. He stated that you plowed out his driveway after duty hours with your own truck and further shoveled his walk for him. As you may know, he had a heart attack and could not handle it by himself. His wife has arthritis so she cannot shovel their walk. I wish to add my thanks to theirs for your fine work. This is .ommunity relations at its finest! Mr. Waller could not pronounce your name, but said you were a gentlemen with dark hair and a mustache. MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278 HELD ON JANUARY 27, 1986 The regular meeting of the School Board of Orono independent School District No. 278 was held on Monday, January 27, 1986. Present: Dave MCKown James Franklin James Setter Don Anderson William Levering William Fenholt Kitty Crosby Lucie Taylor UPON ML-ION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Bill Levering, the minutes of the .nary 13. 1986 meeting were approved as presented. Jim Seiter informed the Board that the 1985 District Wide Census had been completed and he stated that it provides a more accurate projection of students. Mr. Setter expressed appreciation to Ron Gilbert and Mary Gentes for doing such a thorough job with the census. UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Bill Levering, approval was granted to hire a Limited L11glish Proficiency teacher for 31 hours per day. Jim Seiter provided informat.on regarding the proposal to house the 4th grade in the middle school nest year because of the crowded conditions at Schumann Elementary. Mr. Seiter stated that, at this point, this is only a proposal although he had met with a committee consisting of parent representatives of 3rd and 4th graders, staff members fror the elementary school and middle school, and administrators on January 21, 19ii for discussion of this proposal and would be meeting again on February 4, 1986 for further discussion. Discussion ensued with parents expressing concern regarding the development/implementation of this proposal versus utilization of other options that were recommended through the EMS Study. Opportunities/avenues available for parents to express their reservations/provide 4nput regarding this type of arrangement was also an element of concern. As a result of this discussion, it was decided to hold a general meeting for the purpose of providing an opportunity for parents to express their views/concerns before the Board makes a decision as to whether or not this proposal should be cons4dered further. UPON NOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Jim Franklin, authorization was granted for Harold Webb Associates to conduct interviews with the 17 recommended can- didates for the superintendency. UPON NOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Lucie Taylor, Don Anderson and Bill Levering will award the diplomas at high school commencement. Kitty Crosby MOVED and Lucie Taylor seconded to amend the motion to include Kitty Crosby. The motion, as amended, carried unanimously. UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the Confidential Secretary Contract for 1985-87 was approved as presented. Jim Franklin provided the Board with a brief report from AMSD regarding per pupil unit reductions that are a possibility as a result of legislative propo- sals from the Governor. UPON MOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by Don Anderson, a letter of recognition will be sent to SAOD (Students Against Drunk Drivers) at Oronn High School, on behalf of the Schocl Board, acknowledging the existence of this newly formed group and informing them that the School Board fully supports their organiza- tion. Jim Franklin reported on the Parent Meet 6 confer meeting held on January 20, 1986. Areas of discussion/information were: 1) class size, 2) intermediate school (4 i 5) issue, 3) school/community calendar, 4) 9th grade class, 5) bus issues and 6) parking problems. UPON NOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the bills As covered by vouchers 050405 through 050432 and 049867 through 049942 were approved as presented. UPON NOTION by Lucie Taylor, seconded by Jim Franklin, the meeting was adjourned. 1, Kithebrine P. Crosby, Clerk Approved: C William D. Levering, Vice Chai 7; John Burger District 43A Hennepin County Committees: Labor -Management Relations. V ..a Chan Governmental Operations Financial Institutions and Insurance Health and Human Services Labor Standards Advisory Committee Department of Lab, - end Industry Minnesota Job Skills F—mershm Board Minnesota House of Representatives 0 Cnn.l M h•m.. qr Speaxer Febt ,y 12, 198ii Mark Bernhardson, Administrator City of Orono FM 18 Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Mark, ---- - Recently Covernor Rudy Perpich announced that he had underestimated state revenue collections for this biennium by $734 million. To make up for his error, the governor has proposed cutting state aid payments to local units of government. Ycur city's finances '.11 be seriously impaired if the governor's plans are enacted into law. Not only would you sFe your local government aid payments reduced, but also you would 1.:se homestead credit payments. Governor Per- •h is leaving locally -elected offi- cials with little choice but L_ r.,ise local real estate taxes. That may salve the state's fiscal dilemma, but it does so by transfer- ring the pr am to you at the local level. My colleagues and I in the Independent Republican House majority ire fighting to protect our cities from bearing the burden of the state's fiscal mismanagement. Your assistance is necessary if we are to persuade the governor and DPL legislators that cities should be spared from cuts. so, please take a few minutes to call or ,rite the governor and some of our liberal DFL representatives and se:iatore to ask them to support the efforts we are making to ba- lance the state budget by cutting areas other than local government aid. We're going to fight: to try to resolve this current budget problem with minimal impairment of the ability of local governments to serve their citizens in our area. we'll appreciate your support in this. C rdialllJ(�, J hn Burger JB/dm / ate Representative P.S. Please share this letter with your mayor and council nembers. They can help also. n neMY b_ Oelt slam Omce autmne at P nnesam ys155 - -n 77M MYarae 110aa. kn^0 up. 04gteeab aaan,l Item. 1e111 473 Jt, .