HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 4618 . �_ • .
. , .
��-
�� 0�
• O O
��b - CITY of ORONO
� �
�� �'�� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
��SI3�4�' � � �. NO. � ��
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES
TO MiTNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 22, SUBDIVISION 2, SECTION 10.56,
SUBDIVISION 16 (L) (2) AND SECTION 10.56,
SU]BDIVISION 16 (C) (6)
FILE NO. #01-2661
WHEREAS,Thomas Anderson and Ingrid Anderson(hereinafter "the applicants")
are owners of the property located at 3550 North Shore Drive within the City of Orono
� (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows:
Lot 25, Lydiard's Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning
� Conunission held a public hearing on February 21, 2001, at which times all persons desiring *
to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and
WI�EREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance application to the City for
variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56,
Subdivision 16 (L) (2) to permit 4,551 s.f. (41 %) hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback
where 4,687 s.f. (42%) exists and 2,775 s.f. (25%) is allowed; and Section 10.56, Subdivision
16 (C) (6) and Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) to permit an encroachment into the average
lakeshore setback on the north side of the house to construct a new fence/wall system
exceeding 3 1/Z feet in height for use as a dog kennel.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota: � . . . , _ . �
� FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #01-2661.
2. The property is located in the LR-1C (1/2 acre) One Family Lakeshore .
Residential Zoning District. �
• 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 21, 2001
and recommended approval on a vote of 4 to 0 for variances based upon the
following findings and hardships: .
Page 1 of 6
. <; .
�—
/� �11�' �
� O . o
��b - CITY of ORONO
� �
'� . RESOLUTION OF �E CITY COUNCI L
. ��`9.kE p4��'G N O. ' � � � � �
�SI3
A. The property is unique by the fact the properly has frontage to Lake
� Minnetonka on both the north side and south side. There are two 0-75'
lakeshore setback zones located on the property. •
B. The replacement of the deck and the dog kennel located to the back of
the house would encroach into the average lakeshore setback to the north
side of the property. The average lakeshore setback ordinance is
intended to protect lakeshore views for adjacent properties. �
C. A visual inspection of the property indicates there is no real real lake
access or water to the north side of the property. The north side of the
property functions as a wetland draining towards Lake Minnetonka. The
� north sides of the properties function as bacic yards and have been
developed accordingly. The primary lake views and docks are located
• to the North Shore Drive side of the property. ' '
D. The retaining wall is being replaced due to the deteriorating of the
. existing railroad ties. The ties are necessary to stabilize the ground
between the driveway and the elevation of the adjacent house.
E. The Planning Commission recommended the applicants construct a
turnaround on the property that would permit a vehicle to maneuver
enough to not require vehicles to back out to North Shore Drive.
4. The�City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar
to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that
. granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor .
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely
serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a
demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial
property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and
intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and �
recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments
• by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety
Page 2 of 6
�
i�� •
/� �11�' �
• � � �
��b. - CITY of ORONO
� � . � .
�� G'ti RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
` s �
��SH04� NO. � __
and welfare of the community.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS .
� Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56,
Subdivision 16 (L) (2) to permit 4,551 s.f. (41 %) hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback
where 4,687 s.f. (42%) exists and 2,775 s.f. (25%) is allowed; and Section 10.56, Subdivision
16 (C) (6) and Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) to permit an encroachment into the average
lakeshore setback on the north side of the house to construct a new fence exceeding 3 %z feet
in height, subject to the following conditions:
1. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the
applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a
building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance
• � � will expire on that date (March 12, 2002), site plan shall be in compliance with �
the site plan attached hereto as Exhibit A.
2. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
� variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a
misdemeanor.
3. The undersigned applicant and owner have read, understand and hereby agree to
the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors
anci�assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title
. of the property. .
• Page 3 of 6
//�-�
/� �11�'
• � � �
��e. - CITY of ORONO
� ' F
'� RESOLUTION OF jHE CITY COUNCIL
. ���gE Hp4�'G NO. ` � � s 1 �' � .
�_S . � .
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular
meeting held on the 12th day of March; 2001.
ATTEST:
����
Linda S. Vee, Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor
Property Owner � Appli ant .
STATE OF MINNESOTA ) �
� ) ss.
� COUNTY OF�HENNEPIN ) � �
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of
March, 2001 by Barbara A. Peterson and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of
Orono, a Minnesota �ci�M a�; o�ration and said instrument was executed on behalf of the
City. RACHEL DODGE �
NOTARY PUBLtC-MINNE^OTA � � � /� �
. r,• My Cortunission Expires Jan.31,2005 L�.—/��r ,�CY�'�
. +� ���^~c.:•r Notary Public
. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) �
. , ) ss. �
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this �day of �,��t,t S-F , 200! before me a Notary.Public within and for .
said county, personally appeared .��qr�Ql �/ef�/�y1i �,�(�known to me
to be the person(s) described in and w o executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged .
that he(they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. �
RACHEL DODGE � C��-C_,G�--c�(� �C2��,2 _ .
� NOTARY PUBI.IC-MfNNtE:OTA
:.,,,,�,' �d1y Commission Expires Jan.31,2oos Notary Public
• �`��y �s���� Page 4 of 6 ,
ri . .
. , � ,
�—__ -
/� �� � �
.� o . o
. ��e. � . CITY of 4RON0
� � .
'� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
� ��`4kE I3p4�'G NO. _ � � �ro .� �
S
STATE OF. MINNESOTA )
� ) ss. .
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) _
On this �� day of `�p�eM�� , 20 D I before me a Notary Public within and for �
said county, personally appeared ���yy�S_��Pi36Yl , �f'"1"ipl�L. known to me
to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged
that he(they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.
(..��GL.�-r�-� �aC�
RACHEL DOQGE Notary Public
�. �,"+�'"t.:;'� NOTARY PUBUC-M!1V�`!c^nTa
.�:�.,X'.' p!ly(i(..... ... �
• `i
• .
� Page 5 of 6
• � i •
J� .
/� O�
i � � .
��� - CITY of ORONO
� � . .
�� G'� RESOLUTION OF TH CITY COUNCIL
L�k o4� rvo. � '�� 1 � .
ESH .
� [REVISED SITE PLAN]
� �
�
Page 6 of 6
f
. . + . . • .
' • . 4
• �:
. ��• ' i
� � � � sa b , .
. �
� � 3Nll 2��01N0� �•6z6,.........,. �
� ` � — �. �, 80 Zpl M .
� _ ,;sz
� 31� ' � — �z�s
! N �� � � 9 � . + �
. . _,.,_. — .�0� . .., ,` � . o
. ` � .
. `�"��� �' �■ +.�..
, ' . �. ' � .�. �. �'•��
. . .�0� ���Y/�
. ._ S
` � --.__' •
Ma� � . C�n��a ��a .:o . .
� HS H1�ON} � .
� � . � .
. � ,n�, cs•srs o ,a;
J � �1 + � . *� •Ei /` U . c°
^ � V � J
� �`[ 1
� •
N ' m
� �_ N ��'b� .. . � . M
--.. d' .� . c.n
s ��9r� ��.. r' '��-.�_ � �
N sJ• Srs) �✓ rsJ 3�-•__ �__-�__� N�� N O
��y � � `� -- .�
. I 813S 5L`0'' �'�°>,�o
'� �. .. � � .
� ,�, .�y �
'�„o � ���i�,o �.�,,
J��yy. . M � Y S 1�y .
"';r.Ji n P. ,'r i�J,yy�.fi •
s��yy v � d� !-yl�'� /"� � � .
� �} ( �
y,�'< J�J �i
. '�.� b�� r �/
J �� �
3 '" �r9 ��'� �
� F `' rs� N�y,H � �
�s
�s� �' � ,4 ?vh,, 313a�NO�
rs� ^ � y Jrvq,7
;– _ _ _� � , r �- � � � __ ��,5��_ � .._ _ .__�� . _ _ �—_ -- �
r� fi �;
�S� rs� °' � •oNO� � .��rn'
�
oy � °�
' �,�, l`� � a � � �O �.OZ �r 2'BS .... . /�
n n
rn O1 w ',r A�b� \
, N�lS � �,�� 8ss J�S� ,ok,� �"
.� b ,�, ��� ✓ M ��"��3� ��;; oy
� q� ✓ n n `d �
� S a�� w � N O�S�dQ N ��� � L't ���6� ,
7 � ^ a�d �CS�� << o
� �.�a n a 5�oz S �' . � .
v O ..s:s.... e•scs) z e `° F '
��3a 'd"
' O
� � 4350d021d ad� o .
313a�NO� 8 0 0 . , �
J
� � � z � �d
C�l :� M W saao„os..... o o t'7
� ' � O1 °: x o 0 0
• � �O � Z •
(gsFS J . � . �
S'Ll � � o; p
. �v� ' o S Zt o � �! � � �� � � oO�O ';0 •;�;, C�9�
� �b � . _ � S 5G-'�• �3 .
� ::
� N�,ls��, . � r�iaa 3N11 s��913 .. ...'�''����y,,�
� � � ��s� 1"�H
.. , rs : v ��J,�e . gY
rrs� �N��s�y . .
"�� '
� ��^ �
� 'I���� •
�S' .
. r r
� �
�•......~.�, — � � �t .
�4'9. � �' "�1 ��� +i
`�' � �, ,r .��� �8�i o� . � -
_ � � 3 �� � �, .
� — �Z•ZO
. � � -
� - .
, � .
. o � . � . �
' N
+1 � .
.. � �noiNO� .y6zs: �o� �� r`� �� •
3N1� �d�a a �A ���C � ,
�� . , �t` �p .� ,
. . � � . ..�.... .. .
, � � ...... � :� �..... . ..
� .