Laserfiche WebLink
City of OR ONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 2633 <br />A RESOLUTION GRANTING <br />AN AFTER-THR-FACT VARIANCE TO <br />MUNICIPAL ZONING CODS <br />SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISIONS 8 <br />FILE #1394 <br />WHEREAS, on March 15, 1989, Dennis E. Evans <br />(hereinafter "the applicant") agreed to make application to the <br />City of Orono for a variance as a condition to the sale to <br />Jackson L. Wilson and Judith E. Wilson, husband and wife, of the <br />Property located at 3059 Farview Lane within the City of Orono <br />(hereinaf t<,r "City") legally described as Lot 6, Block 1, <br />Farview, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); <br />and <br />WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for an <br />after -the -fact variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.55, <br />Subdivisions 8 to permit a portion of the pool and deck area as <br />well as an addition to the principal structure, as shown on the <br />survey of Schoell & Madson, Inc. dated January 5, 1989, prepared <br />for Chase Manhattan Financial Center, Inc., to remain 20' from a <br />designated wetlands instead of meeting the required 26' setback. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of <br />Orono, Minnesota: <br />FINDINGS <br />1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1394. <br />2. The property is located in the LR-lA Single Family <br />Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 2 acres in <br />area. The property consists of 2+ contiguous acres in area. <br />3. The Oronr, Planning Commission reviewed this application <br />on April 17, 1989, and recommended approval of the after - <br />the -fact variance based upon the following findings: <br />A) The issuance of Permit #4082 by the City of Orono <br />for the addition on September 10, 1979 confirms that <br />owner at that time had complied with all requirements <br />and zoning standards of the City. <br />B) The building was put up in good faith and reliance <br />upon City approval. <br />C) The denial of this variance years after completion <br />of construction would create an unmarketable property <br />and would be economically unfeasible to correct. <br />Page 1 of 4 <br />