HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 4775 j
/� .
• ('ti.,.,� '
f .
'1 .
��-_- •
�I O� .
� O O
��b. - CITY of ORONO
� �
�� t,'�' RESOWTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
��SH�4� NO. _ � � "Y �
,
A RESOLUTION RENEWING VARIANCES
TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22,
SUBDIVISIONS 2; SECTION 10.56, �
SUBDIVISION 16 (L); SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B)
� FILE NO. 02-2746 '
WHEREAS, Mark Finney, (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property •
located at 3210 North Shore Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally
described as follows:
Exhibit"A"attached,Hennepin County,Minnesota(hereinafter"the property");and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for variances to Municipal Zoning Code ~ �
Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) to permit additions to the
! existing residence, such construction and driveway constituting hardcover of 3,888 s.f (37.5%)in �
the 75-250' lakeshore setback where 5,851 s.f. (56.6%) exists and 25% is allowed, and to Section
10.24,Subdivision 5 (B)to permit a residential addition to be setback 8' from the side property line
where 10' is required; and
WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning
Commission held a public hearing on February 19, 2002, at which time all persons desiring to be �
heaxd concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon.
� NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, `
Minnesota:
FINDINGS � .
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File#02-2746.
2. The property is located in the LR-1B, Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning '
District where 1 acre is the minimum lot size and 140 feet is the minimum lot width.
The actual lot area is 20,783 s.f. (0.48 acre) and a lot width of 63'. -
� 3. The Planning Commission reviewed the application for variances and recommended
Page i of i
ii=-�
�� �� .
� o 0
��b. - CITY of ORONO �
� ' ti
�� G'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL �
��`�$ES�Ipg'� NO. � � � �
�
approval by a vote of 6 to 0 based on the following findings and hardships:
A. The proposed site plan has reduced hardcover in the 75-250' setback.
B. The reduction of hardcover is due to a second driveway being removed and
large portion of the existing parking area being reduced.
,
C. The proposed garage addition will replace an existing detached garage on the
property. A new detached garage is proposed to be constructed at the rear of
the property approximately 210' from the house.
D. The existing house meets the required 75' lakeshore setback and average
lakeshore setback. �
E. The current house was constructed prior to adoption of the current zoning `
. . standards. The house was constructed 8' from the property line at the corner
where the property addition will meet the existing house. The house is
constructed on the lot closer to the property line on the north side, towards
the lake. The addition thus moves further from the side property line as the
addition moves further from the lake. The 2' variance allows the garage
addition to continue the line of the existing house while maximizing usable �
yard space east of the addition.
F. The property is one of only a few residential lots in the City of Orono that is
located adjacent to a B-2 (Commercial — Marina) zoning district. The . �
. proposed house additions will help to screen the marina use next door and
protect the small amount of yard area located on the east side of the house.
G. The lot is a "back lot". Another residential lot is located between North
Shore Drive and the property.
4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it �
and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district;that granting the ,
variances will not adversely affect traffic conditions,light,air,nor pose a fire hazard
or other danger to neighboring property;would not merely serve as a convenience to
the applicant,but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is �
• necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in �
keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the
City.
Page 2 of z •
i��
�� �� _
� o 0
��d. - C ITY of ORONO
� � �
�� G'�'� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCII. .
��`qx'ESgOg'� NO. � �' `� �
�
� 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission,reports by City Staff, comments by
the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health,safety and welfare
of the community.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER,AND CONDITIONS �
Based upon one or more of the above findings,the Orono City Council hereby grants renewal
variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22,Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56,Subdivision 16
(L)to permit additions to the existing residence,such construction constituting hardcover of 3,888
s.f. (37.5%) in the 75-250' lakeshore setback where 5,851 s.f. (56.6%) exists and 25% is allowed,
and to Section 10.24,Subdivision 5 (B)to permit a residential addition to be setback 8'from the side
property line where 10' is required subject to the following conditions: . �
1. The property shall be developed in conformance with the site plan dated 2-4-02,
• � and most revised on 3-19-02. �
2. The property owner shall grant a utility easement along the south property line for
the sewer.
3. The final size of the screen porch shall not exceed 350 s.f.
4. Authorities granted by the variances run with the property not with the applicant,but
are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within
one year of the date of Council approval, or these variances will expire on that date
� (March 25, 2003).
� � 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of the variances . �
shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any
authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
6. The undersigned owner has read,understands and hereby agrees to the terms of this
resolution and on behalf of lumself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby
agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property.
�
Page 3 of 3 .
�
/—_.'"
� O� ,
• O O
��b. - C I�Y of ORONO
� � F
�� �,'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL � .
. ��SH.p4� NO. � �° �' � �
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono,Minnesota at a regular meeting
held on the 25th day of March, 2002. �
ATTEST:
_ . ��� _�.
� U
inda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor
Applicant(s)
STATE OF MINNESOTA �
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN �
� The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 25th day of March,2002 by
Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Mi id
instrument was executed on behalf of the City. ;,� �• JACKIE YOUNG T
� '�� � NOTARY PUBUC-M1NN;.,0,.�
�j `� ' �' PJ;y Comni�sslo� .cpires Jan.3i.2��5
.�ia� /
`y � �
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPN
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before �me on this / -S'L day .of �
���'� � , 200 Z � by Lirida S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota
municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
RACHEL DODGE �--��'``-��- �"��
i3�'```" NOTARYPUdLIC-MINN�"OTA NotaryPublic
���4'�L'�-
� '`;.`";' M�,Commiss�on Expires Jan.31,2005
a VIA. .,
la �f
•
Page 4 of 6
, . ,
�---
/� �� .
• � � . �. ..
��e. - CITY of ORONO
� F
�� G'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
��SH��� � NO. _ � ��°�' � �
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
-f�` � _.
On this �5 day of VV�-�� , 20�, ���-. �' ��-i , �t�'��. .
personally appeazed before me, .
who is personally known to me �
_� whose identity I proved on the basis of 1'`�� �`° �
. whose identity I proved on the oath/afFirmation , a credible
witness
and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the
same as his/her/their free act and deed. �
����� ��� . � .
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA
• COUNTY OF HENNEPIN a, RACHEL DODGE
.�;�;,�.
°'ri>''�" NOTARYPUBLIC-MINNE^OTA
:;'`•°r� My Commisslon Expires Jan.31,2005
On this day of � ,20_, �,_,�`��•,-- _
personally appeared before me,
who is personally known to me
whose identity I proved on the basis of
whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation , a credible
witness
and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the �
same as his/her/their free act and deed.
� � . � Notary Public. �
� �
Page 5 of 6
, , . •
� 4775
E�chibit A
Property Description
That part of the west 57.3 feet of the east 115.05 feet of Government Lot 1, Section 8,
Township 117,Range 23, lying north of a line drawn westerly passing at a right angle
through the east line of said 57.3 feet to a point distant 165 feet north of its intersection
with the northerly line of"Lydiard's Park",Lake Minnetonka.
Together with an easement for drive way purposes over and across that part of the west
10 feet of the east 67.75 feet of said Government Lot 1, lying between the south line of
the above described property and the northerly right-of-way line of County Road No. 51.
��'
- �.�;: -
_. i - -
-- -\ ;,�; ��� .
�r , .
- _ �`� � ._
_ � .
�