Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-26-1985 Council PacketMINUTES OF THE REGULAR 0140NO COUNCIL. MEETING 11E1.!) AUGUST 26, 1985. PAGE 1 ATTENDANCE: 7:04 PM CONSENT AGENDA* The Orono Counci 1 met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Butler, Counci lmember. s Adams and Frahm. Absent: Councilmembers Grabek and Hammerel. The following represented the City Staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson, Building b Zoning Administrator Mabusth, and City Recorder Peterson. City Attorney Blatz and City Engineer Cook were also present. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to approve the Consent Agenda subject to removing Items N2 Approval of Minutes, #6 Asplund/Monge Variance, and M7 Shaver/Tearse Riparian Issue, per councilmember request. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). #956 MRS. PHILIP W. PILLSBURY 1200 BRACRETTS POINT ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #1835 PUBLIC BEARING i:15 -7:17 Representing Mrs. present. Pillsbury, her attorney Steve Pflaum was Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted the certificate of mailing and affidavit of publication. City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed the application stating that the old house has been torn down, the proposed new house improves the setback, there is no excessive hardcover, and on -site septic system is adequate. Bernhardson state I that lot area and lot width variances are needed to conf or: . Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that there are no problems and it iE an improved condition on the property with no lakeshore setb cck and hardcover problems. Mabusth stated that the Planning Commission recommended unanimously to approve the variance application. There were no comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution 018.35 as drafted approving the variance. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). 0957 F.M. CURTIS 2180 PROSPECT AVENUE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION 11836 PUBLIC HEARING 7:30 - 7:34 rred W. and Margaret Curt 1s were ptcsk!nt tc;r this rratIer. Zovir.,l Adrriinist.ratot K.+husth noted the certif ,-ate ma;ltng and jtfl(1.11vit c)t 1,u1,11c.etiun. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 26, 1985. PAGE 2 #957 CURTIS continued City Administrator Bernhardson explained the City's request (as the applicant in this matter) to correct an existing drainage problem at 2180 Prospect Avenue which will also improve the drainage flow between the Curtis and Jentilucci properties. Bernhardson stated that the Jentilucci's are in agreement with the proposal. APPROVAL OF MINUTES City Engineer Cook explained his proposed plans for correcting this problem. LaDean McWilliams, 1130 Willow Dr., was present for this matter but made no comments. There were no comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Frahm requested that staff obtain a written statement from the Jentilucci's indicating their concurrance. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution#1836approving the Conditional Use Permit. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to approve the Minutes of the August 12, 1985 Council meeting amending the motion on page 4-last paragragh to read "It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Mayor Butler,". Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS There were no comments from the Park Commission. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT - DOCitING RESTRICTIONS LMCD Representative JoEllen Hurr was present. Hurr passed out to the Counci 1 literature on boat launches and a map of the lake. Hurr reported that the LMCD held a public hearing on August 14th regarding the number of boats that could be stored at private docks. Hurr stated that many people felt that government should not interfere with the number of boats stored in front of their homes, however, many people were in :support of legislative action to control the number of boats. Hurr stated that one option being considered was no restriction on two boats, and any more than two boats must prove ownership. Hurr presented and explained a printout from Hennipin County Municipal Court of .ill the tickets issued in 1984. Hurr stated that they will be lobbying the legislature for a stricter Boating While Intoxicated (BWI) law however, the LMCD may adopt their own ordinance for stricter BWI enforcement if that st at e,wi de law is not adopted next legislative scission. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 26, 198S. PAGE 3 PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. David Fox, 1645 Bohns Point Road, stated that he would like to see the City of Orono take action to regulate construction activity of homes on these points: 1)hours of construction should be Monday - Friday 8 am - 5 pm, Saturday 9 am - 4 pm, and no construction on Sunday. 2 )requiring on -site sanitary facilities. Mr. Fox also indicated his interest in item #19* Parade of Homes. tie stated that he hoped the City of Orono would develop a plan to deal with future Parade of Homes. Mayor Butler told Mr. Fox that item /19* was already approved on the consent agenda accepting staff's memo and supplied Mr. Fox with a copy of that memo advising him if he had any questions to contact City Administrator Bernhardson. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: i852 STANLEY GREGORY 1410 SHORELINE DRIVE CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT Mrs. Stanley Gregory and W.P. Gregory were present for this matter. Also present was Greg Kopischke, applicant's Engineer/Planner. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the application for a conditional us(: permit for alteration of land to create a decorative pond. Bernhardson stated that staff's recommendation is that this be approved as having minimal negative effect and possibly a beneficial effect. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that "experts" concur that the proposed decorative pond will have little negative impact on water quality or quantity, and that this plan would be an improvement. ( "Experts" being Jim Mahady of MC'WD, Joel Settles of U.S. Soils Off ice, and Dr. Richard Hanson of FWBI ) Mabusth stated that the only problem the applicant might have is maintaining the water level. Greg Kopischke stated that because they are increasing storm water storage by creation of the pond, it will allow settlementof sediments, which should improve water quality. Kopischke stated that the channel area would be a minor depression, no more than 1.2--18" deep, just enough to allow water to move out. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to direct staff to draft a resolution approving the Conditional Use permit for the insta11ation of a decorative pond. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE REGULAR OPONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD AUGUST 26, 1985. PAGE 4 #927 STANLEY GREGORY 1410 SHORELINE DRIVE VARIANCE Mrs. Stanley Gregory and W.P. Gregory were present for this matte.-. Also present representing the applicant were Greg Kopisc•hke, Engineer/Planner and Jack Robertson, Architect. City Administrator Bernhardson explained applicant's request to install a swimming pool requiring a structure and hardcover variance within 75'of the lakeshore, additionally the pool would be constructed 5'4" from the principal structure whereas a minumum of 10' is normally required. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the problem areas of hardcover. Jack Robertson submitted an adjusted proposed plan which changes the placement of the pocl to 10'8" from the principal structure eliminating the need for that variance. Robertson stated that although the pool would be within the 75' setback area, it would not be visible. Robertson Stated the new plan reduces the size of the pool which keeps it outside the mandated DNR 50' setback and has no hard surface around it with no run-off problem into the lake. Based on the findings that the applicant just submitted this revised plan and staff has not had the opportunity to review it, and the absence of two councilmembers, it was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to table this matter until the September 9, 1985 Council meeting. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). #876 ASPLUND/LMiONGE 3444 RASTLA" STREST VARIANCE RESOLUTION #1837 Dean & Nancy Menge were present for this matter. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution #1837 granting the v an�e. Motion, Ayes ( 2) , Nays (1 ) . Counci lmember Frahm vL, -ty. . #930 SHAVER/TEARSE 1080 FERNDALE ROAD WEST RIPARIAN ISSUE CONTINdED Ken Truji I le and Walter H. Rockenstein, of Faegre & Benson, were present for this matter. Councilmember Adams requested staff to update him on the reason for delay. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the applicants' were delinquent in submitti;ig the appropriate opinions to City Attorney Radio, at which time Attorney Radio was scheduled for a trial and has been unable to attend to this matter. MINUTFS UN THE: REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING IIE;LD AUGUST 26, 1985. PAGE 5 #930 SHAVER/TEARSE continued It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Mayo: Butler, to table this matter until the September. 9th Council meeting. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). #932 WARD EDWARDS* 2474 CARMAN STREET VARIANCE RESOLUTION #1838 It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution #1838 as drafted granting a variance. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). #942 ARTHUR FINKELSTEIN* 1740 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION 11813 It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution #1813 as drafted granting a variance. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). #944 JAMES LEAR* 3127 CASCO CIRCLE VARIANCE DENIAL RESOLUTION 11839 It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution #1839 as drafted denying an after - the -fact variance. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). #949 GERALD ANDERSON/HALE CONSTRUCTION 4495 NORTH SHORE DRIVE VARIANCE RESOLUTION #1840 Mr. Gerald Anderson was not present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the application for a variance of the average lakeshore setback. Bernhardson stated that staff recommends approval of the variance noting Condition #2 in the new drafted resolution which states that the deck can never be enclosed. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the variance. Mabusth noted that neither adjacent neighbor attended the public hearing to object to the variance. Councilmember Frahm suggested that in the future neighbors submit written approval. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to adopt amended Resolution #1840 approving the variance. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 26, 1965. PAGE ,. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: CRYSTAL BAY CHANGE ORDER #2* It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to approve Crystal Bay Change Order #2 per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). MAYOR'S REPORT CABLE TV REPORT Mayor Butler had no report at this time. Councilmember Frahm reported that there is a budget whi,-i must be reveiwed and approved within 30 days. City Administrator Bernhardson stated that the budget was received today in the mail and it will be on the agenda for reviewal at the September 9th meeting. TRANSPORTATION REPORT: COUNTY ROAD 15 VARIANCE APPROVAL* It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to approve staf f ' s recommendation as requested in the memo dated August 23, 1985. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: NORTH SHORE DRIVE City Administrator Bernhardson recalled that at the Mayl3th Council meeting the residents on North Shore Drive presented a petition requesting that no parking signs be posted on County Rd. 51, which followed a 1982 petition requesting no parking of boat trailers, at which time the County stated that they would not separately prohibit parking for a certain class of vehicles. Bernhardson reported that because of concerns and discussions with the neighbors in June & July, the Police Dept. has tried to work with the neighbors. Bernhardson stated in addition the DNR and LMCD has attempted to secure long term parking near the public: access. As outlined in his memo dated August 21, 1985, Bernhardson requested Council to approve staff's recommendation. Dan Regan, 3410 North Shore Dr. , was present represent ing the residents of North Shore Drive. Also present was Kathleen Wallace, Commissioner's Administrator for the DNR. Mr. Regan expressed his thanks to staff for their time and assistance in this matter. Regan mentioned a concern of his regarding the liability of the homeowner should anyone be hurt on their property even though the property is posted no trespassing. Regan stated that in his opinion, the only one that would possibly be adversely affected by the posting no parking signs would be other Ororo residents. City Administrator Bernhardson stated that by posting no parking east of North Arm it may just. push the cars to park further down County Rd. A together with adve t svl y affecting the off -lake Orono r�-sident.s from using the lake. MINUTE.'; OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MFL`I'I NG IiN:U) AUGUST 26, 1985. PAGE 7 NORTH SHORT: DRIVE: continued Mr. Regan stated that more traf f. i.c is coming f rom the marina when they are full. Regan stated he is also against a five year commitment. Kathleen Wallace stated that the task force recognizes that th,are are problems. Wallace stated that there is a need for more secr.re access across the lake everywhere. Wallace noted that !-based on a study of parking of 1 per 20 acres, they recommended there be 700 car trailer parking spaces on the 1--: e. Wa:rlace stated that per LMCD there are presently 1172 unreliable parking spa;.es, and 185 free reliable parking spaces within 1500 feet of a public access. Kathleen Wallace stated that earlier this season they wrote to the Hennepin County Sheriff informing him of the additional funds available for enforcement and to date have not received a response. Wallace also stated that they will be actively pursuing, through the Attorney General's office, that Hennepin County to increase the prosecution of violation on the lake. Wallace stated that they will lose some overflow parking because of the re -alignment of County Rd. 15 6 5.1 in Spring Park. Counci lmember Frahm stated that he has never heard the DNR indicate that they would even recognize parking skates other than ones directly at access parking lots. Frahm also stated that the cities should not be tacked with the expense of maintaining these pr.-posed free parking spaces. Frahm expressed his concerns for the current safety problems on the lake without the increase of traffic and boaters ar;d felt that these safety issues should be solved before more accesses are provided. Further discussion on this matter will be held when all counciimembers were present.. BIG ISLAND* It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Coun<:ilmember Adams, to accept City Administrator B rnhardson's memo regarding Big Island. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (U). SEWER ASSESSKENT POLICY City Administrator Bernhardson noted that the case that brought this matter up was the request to put in a laundromat in one of the buildings in Navarre. Bernhardson stated that there are currently 19 sewer units to he assessed to that property which would cost the laundromat owners $25,500 in connection charges only. City Administrator Bernhardson reviewud his roport and recommendet ie)ns regarding the policy for assessing sewer units. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 26, 1985. PAGE 8 SEWER ASSESSMENT POLICY continued Robert E. Gould, representing the proposed laundromat, was present for *his matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained to Mr. Gould staff's recommendation to charge them $335 per unit and $33.50 per year after 1984 as outlined in Recommendation (d). Mr. Gould indicated approval of this charge. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Mayor Butler, to approve staff's recommendations as outlined in the report dated August 23, 1985. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). ORDINANCE CODE ADOPTION* It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to accept staff's recommendation regarding Coded Adoption by Ordinance. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). REVENUE SHARING REIMBURSEMENT* It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to accept staff's recommendation regarding Revenue Sharing Reimbursement for Budgeted Expenditures. Motion, Oyes (3), Nays (0). PARADE OF HOMES* It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to accept staff's memo regarding the Parade of Homes. Motion, Ayes (3), Nayo (0). FWBI - WATER METER REFUWD* It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to approve a ref una for an unused water meter to the FWBI as recommended by staff. Motion, Ayes ( 3) , Nays ( 0) . AUCTION* It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to approve the re -scheduling of a public auction to be held August 31, 1985 at 10:00 AM per staff request. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). TEMPORARY PATROL OFFICER SERVICES* RESOLUTION 01841 It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded Ly Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution #1841 for Temporary Patrol Officer services. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). 2695 CASCO POINT ROAD* RESOLUTION #1842 It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution #1842 Ordering Abatement of Hazardous Building Action at 2695 Casco Point Road. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). MINUTES OF T11E IiLGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING 11E1,D AUGUST 26, 1985. PAGE 9 ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION• It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to accept City Administrator Bernhardson's information report regarding: Temporary Patrol Officer, Highway 12 Corridor, Crystal Bay Appraiser, Rovegno Fence, Gas Spill, Zoning Ordinance Amendments, Moody's Municipal Credit Report, and the Smith -Power's Sewer. Matter. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). SEAL COATING BIDS City Administrator Bernhardson requested that this item be added to the agenda for action. Bernhardson requested Council approve staffs recommendation to reject all seal coa':ing bids received on June 28, 1985. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Mayor Butler, to reject all seal coating bids received on June 28, 1985 ..nd staff to report back on this matter. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (U). CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT City Attorney Kathleen Blatz updated the Council regarding the Conservation Districts concerns with the North Shore Marina and Chaska Marina. LICENSES* BILLS• City Administrator Bernhardson stated that staff has met with Frank Mixa and that they will review and Rake a recommendation for the next Council meeting. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to approve the following Licenses: Firearm Use Permit - Robert E. Nash On -Sale Liquor License - William Wear Solicitors License - Discount Flowers, Al Penke Septic Installers License - McCarty Water & Waste Septic Installers License - Duane Ritter Excavating Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to approve payment of the All Funds Accounts and Liquor Store Accounts. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). ADJOURNMENT 9:37 PM It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to adjourn the regular Council meeting at 9:37 PM and enter into Executive Session. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). ATTEST: or thy M,'- 1 in, Pity Cr rk Mar} c'. Hut�Er,-M+ynr s AGENDA FOR REGULAR COUNCIL MELTING SET FOR MONDAY, AUGUST 26, 1985, 7:00 P.M. (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. COUNCIL ROLL CALL COUNCIL E�� 1. CONSENT AGENDA* r,u G PUBLIC BEARINGS CITY OF 7:15 rK #956 Mrs. Philip W. Pillsbury, 1200 Bracketts Point Road o Variance - Resolution 7:30 PM M957 F.W. Curtis, 2180 Frespect Avenue - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution APPROVAL OF MINUTES *2. Regular Meeting of August 12, 1985 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS LAKE MINNBTONRA CONSERWTION DISTRICT REPORT - JoEllen Hurr 3. Docking Restr?.ctions PUBLIC COMMENTS ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 4. #852 Stanley Gregory, 1410 Shoreline Drive - Conditional Use Permit 5. #927 Stanley Gregory, 1410 Shoreline Drive - Variance *6. i876 Randy Aspiund/Dean Monge, 3444 Eastlake Street - Variance Resolution *7. #930 Shaver/Tearse, 1080 Ferndale Road West - Riparian Issue Continued at September 9th, 1985 Meeting *8. 0932 Ward Edwards, 2474 Carman Street - Variance - Resolution *9. 0942 Arthur Finkelstein, 1740 Shadywood Road - Variance - Resolution *10. 1944 James Lear, 3127 Casco Circle - Variance - Denial Resolution 11. #949 Gerald Anderson/Rage Construction, 4495 North Shore Drive Variance - Resolution CITY RNGINBER'S REPORT *12. Crystai Ray Change Ordor N2 MAYOR'S REPORT CAJUY TV RF P()HT AGENDA FOR REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, AUGUST 26, 1985, 7:00 P.M. TRANSPORTATION REPORT *13. County Road 15 Variance Approval CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 14. North Shore Drive *15. Big Island 16. Sewer Assessment Policy *17. Ordinance - Code Adoption *.18. Revenue Sharing Reimbursement *19. Parade of Homes *20. FWBI - Water Refund *21. Auction *22. Temporary Patrol Officer Services *23. 2695 Casco Point Road *ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION 24. Highway 12 Corridor 25. Appraiser ')6. Rovegno Fence 27. Gas Spill 28. Zoning Ordinance Amendments 29. Moody's Municipal Credit Rating 30. Smith -Powers CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S LETTERS AND MEMOS CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT REQUEST FOR EXECUTIVE SESSI0N LICENSES (31*) SILLS (32*) ADJOURNMENT COUNCIL {MEETING To: Mayor Butler, Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator AUG Orono Council Members --- - - - - - - . �- - .. . _ . c1TY OF ORONO Date: August 21, 1985 Subject: #956 Mrs. Philip W. Pillsbury, 1200 Bracketts Point Road - Procedural Variance - Lot Area & Lot Width Zoning District - LR-lA Application - Lot area and lot width variance required because the former residence structure/foundation was removed - new structure to be located out of the 75 foot setback area. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners Iist Exhibit D - Survey/Site Plan Exhibit E - Elevation Exhibit F - Resolution Lot Area Required = 87,120 s.f. or 2 acres Existing = 51,154 s.f. or 1.17 acres Variance = 35,966 s.f. or 41% Lot Width Required = 200' Existing = 173' at 75' lakeshore setback line Variance = 27' or 13.5* Hardcover Review 0-75' 12,750 s.f. = 0 allowed 25% 75-250' 31,674 s.f. = 8,031 s.f. or 25% allowed 30% 250-500' 6,730 s.f. = 960 s.f. or 14% Staff has worked for over 3 months with the applicant's attorney and architect but never realized until the building permit application was filed that the old foundation was not to be used with the new construction. We were unable to meet the deadline for scheduling a public hearing at the August 19th meeting of the Planning Commission. The public hearing is scheduled before the C-ouncil at your August 26th meeting. The Planning Commission reviewed the application and voted unanimously to recommend approval. REVIEW OF APPLICATION Staff can confirm all new construction meets required setbacks for both principal and accessory structures. The new residence has been pulled out of the 75 foot setback area where the previous residence way; located approximately 60 feet from the lakeshore. Hardcover within th..� 75-250, setback arts has been maintained at 25% coverage. Septic test-, confirm adequate area for on -site septic systemSboth principal and alternate. Zoning File #956 August 21, 1985 Page 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION To approve the variance application of Mrs. Philip Pillsbury to permit construction of a new residence on a property located at 1200 Bracketts Point Road that lacks the required lot area and lot width within the LR-lA zoning district. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. A house had existed on the property for over 40 years. 2. Septic tests confirm the property can sustain a principal and alternate on -site septic system. 3. Only reasonable use of the property. 4. Adjacent lots are developed. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission recommendation. �' fir, t!l i•i, CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional project) After -the -Fact Fees ( 4� i0X>)tlA�4! X)i{J(7(J(1CXiro(i(d41tiX Xti�f &4 ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 1200 Bracketts Point Road 5 6 Property Identification Number (P.I.D. ) ,11-J17-3 4 o 0(-, i Please check one -- Is the property abstract or X torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name Mrs. Philip W. Pillsbury Phone 473-8682 Mailing Address 300 West Ferndale Road, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- OWNER Name Mrs. Philip W. Pillsbury Phone 473-8682 Mailing Address 300 West Ferndale Road, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Date Property Acquired _ May 1, 1985 (month/year) Purchase Agreement signed September 26, 1984. I (do) do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property LR-lA Residential Re sidt -al Other (specify) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 700,000 Describe request in detail: Lot area and lot width variance to construct new house. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VARIANCES REQUIRED X Lot Area X Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances ( Front Side Rear) Oth(-r -- (OVi:R ) 3 t 83•04 a , •i ' SORVEY 35 O us so _ •� 2 T 77 co S741 • /\ ' __ \•erg' -J III) 4 7 7 a VL ��• f qp a 1847 ll.Ii �s i 114, GR M TREES R f ,1 2 Oak r ���' taw q — ► ,� ti 0.4p. w •s I ii 40 95' IN �1 J i a e i I dowti c 1 ` VOC Doc 'moefflee if 9 RUN DATE 08/06/85 r BATCH 003 38 11-117-23 23 0003 PROP ADOR 01491 SHORELINE OR OWNER NAME R H EVANS TAXPAYER R H EVANS NAME/ADDR 1491 SHORELINF DRIVE WAYZATA 1114 55391 HEtd1EPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 11-117-23 23 0016 01480 GPEFN TREES RD C A S PLATOU CARL 3 SUS4N PLATOU 1480 GREEN TREES RD WAYZATA MN 55391 • 38 11-117-23 32 0010 PROP ADDR 01265 ERACKETTS POINT RD OW'NEP NAME MICHAEL E LYNN III I WIFE TAXPAYEP MICHAEL A OPJA LYNN III NAME/ADDR 1265 BRACKETTS POINT WAYZATA MN 55391 •' 38 11-117-23 32 0018 Thomas & Ella Crosby ,. Thomas & Ella Crosby 1220 Bracketts Point Rd Wayzata, MN 55311 A 38 11-117-23 32 0013 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 5 38 11-117-23 32 0001 01200 ERACKETTS POINT RD CORIfNE GPIFFITtt PILLSBURY CORINNE G PILLSBURY 1300 TCF TOWER MPLS MN 55402 CORIINE GRIFFITH PILLSCURY CORINNE G PILL`EUWY TOTAL BATCH 003 00005 1300 TCF TCUER MPLS HN 55402 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCUPATE AND TRUE REFRESENTATIO.1 OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROP TAXATI6N, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLECGE AM BELIEF. DATE(1' ( _ , � )BY Y �•IA]_-- --_____-•,hwitrl;! -�I +.I!li^--�__��=Ilr►u;�== _� - �f'.�• - � � !I__J;TI l 11 iEJ _IJJI;—I]]ll==-� .i��s., - li>s-Sam .f�7s-A.M. 11 J> li..ls ��1+� — rwi _ •^ —.--_. . ..........•.....�•............. s —111111111!/! 111—m'] 7Z. `z 733 _ — a �� ==i ]]1 = Ea�—_-1111g1�ff/miiie7�� I jig 1331 I]]31. !! -- I I 332 :—� __....z�_� 1= ems,..,.,»..��,.=- • _ 9ii = fJfi _ ' 1=!- r � - �•T Fps �" '- �� Y ,'i9•� ° `''. d. ;1 �,�+. ` r� LTZ� ' _ •,�,�• , - - — City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE 1956 WHEREAS, Corinne G. Pillsbury (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 1200 Bracketts Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Those parts of Lots 1 an 10, and of the abandoned parts of Center Avenue and of the County Road as laid out on the plat of Rearrangement of Orono Point decribed as beginning at the point of intersection of the Westerly line of Lot 3 extended and the extension of the North line of the South 100 feet of Lot 1; thence Northwesterly along the extension of said Westerly line of Lot 3 to its intersection with the Southly line of County Road No. 7 as now laid out; thence Easterly and Northeasterly along the Southerly line of said road to its intersection with the extension of the North line of Lot 1; thence East to the Northeast corner of Lot 1; thence Southerly along the Easterly line of Lot 1 to its inter- section with the North line of the South 100 feet of Lot 1; thence West to the point of beginning all in Rearrangement of Orono Point, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Deeds in and for said County; (hereinafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of a new residence on a property that contains 1.17 acres in area instead of the required 2 acres and measures 173 feet at the 75 foot lakeshore setback line instead of the required 200 feet. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 1956. 2. The property is located in the LR-lA Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on August 19, 1985, and recommended approval of the proposed variances teased upon the following findings: Page ] of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUrION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A) a house had existed on the property for over 40 years. B) Septic tests confirm the property can sustain a principal and alternate on -site septic system. C) The continued residential use of the property is the only reasonable use. D) The adjacent properties are developed. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neigh- boring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a sub- stantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of a new residence on the property ) ocated at 1200 Bracketts Point Road subject to the following conditions: 1. Authorities g-anted by this variance run with the property not with th, applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 26, 1986). 2. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall he punishable as a misdemeanor. I,age 2 of 4 City of OR.,ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and here- by agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of herself, her heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 26th day of August, 1985. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor (1) Property Owner Page 3 of 4 City of OR ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. yS STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 1985 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. CGJNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 1965, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoinginstrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION FXPIRT..", Page 4 of 4 COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF ORONO TO: Council FROM: Michael P. Gatfron, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE: 8-22-85 SUBJECT: #957 - Fred W. Curtis, 2180 Prospect Avenue - Conditional Use Permit - Fill List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Plat Map Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Easement Site Plan Exhibit D - Fill Placement Plan As part of the Crystal Bay Sewer Project, we have the op- portunity to correct an existing drainage problem and proviJe Mr. and Mrs. Curtis w'th a maintainable back yard area. The proposal will take approximately 370 cubic yards of excess fill from the sewer installation, raising the Curtis's back yard an average of 1' to 21. This will also help to channelize the neighborhood drainage flow between the Jentilucci and Curtis properties. This is not a designated wetland area, but merely a low intermittent collection area. The City Engineer has drawn up the plans. Staff recommends approval per the attached resolution. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 20 FILE #957 WHEREAS, Fred W. Curtis is the owner of the property located at 2180 Prospect Avenue located within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: In Section 10, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, commencing 515.625 feet North of the Southwest corner of the Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter, then North 130 feet, then East 208 feet, then South 130 feet, then West 208 feet to the point of beginning, (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, on behalf of Fred W. Curtis, the City Public Works Department (acting as applicant) has applied to the City for a Conditional Use Permit to permit the filling of portions of the property with spoil material cr(-:ated by the Crystal Bay Sewer Project, per Munici.al Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 20. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FIN, as 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #957. 2. The property is located in the RR-1B single F'ami ly Rural Residential Zoning District. 3. The proposed fill consists of approximatly 370 cubic yards of clean fill material placed over the existing surface to a depth averaging 1 to 2 feet over an -area approximatly 100' x 100' in dimension. 4. The proposei fill wi t help to eliminate a low drainage area which has historically been too w,,t to maintain but is not considered as a wet 1 and area. The fill w i l l help to channe l i ze the overland flow into a maintainabl*.-� channel. 5. Thisfi 11in,j will not <i significant inc-reas! in tht• amount of drainage leavinil tho Curtis property nor will it have a significant effect on thf, neighborhood drainage pattern. 6. The "ity C-unci l has conaid«,r#f A thi:; appl it.°ation includin.3 the f i nd i nys ind recommonda t i un,i of t h, i' l .i i nn i ng Co mini :: s i ^n, reports by staff and comments of tho applicant. ,ind th}, of f,-k-t of thf prof ,jsed use or) •hP health, safety ind wt�' faro of the c.•.,mmunit.y. 1',1ye 1 ,I 1 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. �7. JThe City Council finds th anting a Conditional Use Permit to allow the placement of fill 1 not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS P,sed upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grantsa Co .tional Use Permit Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Sub- division 20, to permit the filling of portions of the property with spoil material created by the Crystal Ley Sewer Project, subject to the following conditions. 1. Placement of fill shall be in accordance with the approved plan submitted by the City Engineer. 2. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3. The undersigned owner has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 26th d y of August, 1985. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor TTTJ Property Owner--- 1' , rl o 2 of 3 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this _ _ _ day of _ 1985 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 1985, before re a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Paqe 3 of 3 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINg 0at1l �iNG 1985. PAGE 1 ATTENDANCE: 7:00 PM CONSENT AGENDA* AUG 026 1985 The Orono Council met on tOW PWth the following members present: Mayor Butler, Co mbers Adams and Frahm. Councilmembers Grabek and Hammerel were absent. The following represented the City Staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Asst. Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder Peterson. City Attorney Blatz and City Engineer Cook were also present. It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to approve the Consent Agenda subject to removing Item #20 (Cable TV Report -Franchising Monies) from the Consent Agenda per Councilmember Adam's request. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). APPROVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, 1985 regular Council (3), Nays (0). PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS* Councilmember Adams, seconded by to approve the Minutes of the July 22, meeting as submitted. Motion, Ayes It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to approve the appointment of Terry D. Morse, 2080 Spates Ave., to the Park Commission. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT* It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to accept City A,':ninistrator Bernhardson's memos regarding LMCD Residential Boat Storage Amendment and Orono's Representative to LMCD. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). IN1NG COMMISSION COMMENTS Planning Commission Representative J. Diann Goetten had no comments at this time. PUBLIC COMMENTS City Administrator Bernhardson reported that many residents of Bohn's Point have concerns and are objecting to the possibility of the Krutzig Property (1629 Bohns Point Road) being in the Parade of Homes. Bernhardson stated that these residents have signed and submitted petition to prohibit the property from participating in the Parade of Homes. Bernhardson furthi-r stated that staff has discussed this matter with Mr. Krutzig regarding possible steps he could take to resolve concerns such as policing the parking situation. Bernhardson noted that at this time, there is no orc'inance prohibit inq this type of activity. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII, MEETING HELD AUGUST 12, 1985. PAGE PUBLIC COMMENTS continued Speaking in behalf of the petitioning residents, David Fox of 1645 Bohns Point Rd., stated that they felt the area was an established residential area with many families with children and they should not be subjected to this type of activity. Mr. Fox stated that the parking problems included the road being too narrow with inadequate access and parking, the amount of hours involved, inadequate lighting, and no sidewalks. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that staff is attempting to determine the amount of cars that can be parked in the area safely. Margene B. Fox, 1645 Bohns Point Rd., stated that the Parade of Homes officials estimated 5,000 people visit an upper bracket home on a typical Sunday for which Bohns Point Road cannot handle because cars must enter and exit on one street. She also felt that this was a low estimate. Councilmember Adams stated that from direct experience, the number of cars that show up on a saturday and sunday to view these homes is appalling. Adams feels strongly that the City should monitor this type of promotional activity. Judson Dayton, 1655 Bohns Point Rd., stated that there is a large green circle area in which the neighbors jointly try to keep looking nice for the kids to play in and would raqu-;�st that the area not be used for parking because of the damage that could be caused on a rainy day. City Administrator Bernhardson stated that the issues of parking in the circle and travel along the circle is strictly a private party matter between Mr. Krutzig, as part owner, and the other owners. Mr. Krutzig stated that he talked with the Chief of Police and has made arrangements for assistance for the parking and the heavy traffic which would occur mainly on weekends. Mayor Butler felt that because there would be a steady f low of cars coming in and out, there must be enough room for two cars to pass each other. Robert H. Owens, 1700 Bohns Point Rd., expressed his concerns for the safety of children and particularly the access for an emergency vehicle if necessary. Mr. Owens also stated that. the City has a responsiblity to look at the public safety issues. MINUTES OF THE RE:GUTAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD AUGUST 12, 1985. PAGE 3 PUBLIC COMMENTS continued Mr. Krutzig stated that in reviewing this with the Police Dept. they did f ind some narrow areas in which no parking on one side would need to be posted. Mr. Krutzig felt that the area could accomadate about 80 cars safely and he would be prepared to pay for any damage done. Mr. Krutzig, as part owner, stated he had planned to approach the other owners of the circle to request permission for parking as has been done in the past for neighborhood parties. J. Carpenter, President of the Minneapolis Builders Association was present per Mr. Krutzig's request. Mr. Carpenter explained the benefits of having Mr. Krutzig's house shown in the Parade of Homes and feels that the neighbors, developer and Police Dept. should work together to come up with a reasonable solution to allow this activity for the few weekends involved. Also present in the audience for this matter were: Carol J. Owens,1700 Bohns Pt. Rd., Suzy Anderson,1720 Bohns Pt. Rd., Douglas and Ceil Lohmar,1635 Bohns Pt. Rd., Elizabath J. Dayton,1655 Bohns Pt. Rd., Bi11.and Katherine Kalweit,1540 Bohns Pt. Rd. , Margaret and Donald Trowbridge, 1625 Bohns Pt. Rd., Nancy and Bruce Solomonson,1480 Bohns Pt. Rd., Helene Blohorn,1595 Bohns Pt. Rd., Terry Feldmann,1725 Bohns Pt. Rd. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to direct staff to work with the neighbors, builder, and Police Dept., and City Administrator to establish the guidelines for this activity to occur. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: 1876 RANDY ASPLUND 3424 E:ASTLAKE STREET RESOLUTION 11820 Mr. Randy Asplund was not present. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that clarifi- cation was needed in regard to the additional issue of removing the plastic underlying the rockbeds. Staff has incorporated it in the drafted resolution for Council review. Councilmember rahm wanted it to go on record that he felt uncomfortable with making a decision abo,.it a hardcover issue which is still unclear. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Ad,lms to adopt RE.!solution #1840 subject to these: amrn:lmerits: Under Cc>nclusions, ordtir and Conditions - Item 1. chan(liny deadlines date from septembor 1, 19h5 to Septemt,e-r 30, 198); Item 5. deletincl "car shall perforate they plastic: so that it meets City staff's aPProval rs 110n- hardeover. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE. REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MI:I:'I'ING IirI,D AUGUST 12, 1985. PAGE 4 t876 DEAN & NANCY MONGE 3444 EASTLAKE STREET VARIANCE - FURTHER REVIEW Dean Monge was present for this hearing. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the applicants' proposed re -designed patio which would encroaci. the 0-75' setback by 5 feet, and exceeding hardcover limits. Mayor Butler felt that due to the circumstances of the applicant's being caught in the middle of this matter, and realizing the applicants' preference for the existing patio and shape, she questioned whether it would be possible to keep the octagon patio design and would be willing to give a little on the encroachment of the 0-75' zone. Asst. Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that if the octagon shaped patio were used it would encroach the 0-75' zone by approximately 9'in a limited area. Councilmember Adams stated that in other cases, property owners with much stronger rationale and aesthetic arguments have been made to conform with hardcover limits within the 0- 751. Mayor Butler stated that the circumstances of this being a piece of property formerly owned by a commercial enterprise and sold to the applicant as is, makes this a special case. Councilmember Frahm stated because of the uniqueness of this property he would give within the 75-250' zone but feels uncomfortable of giving any leeway in the 0-75' zone because the builder directly went against what he was told by the City. Council unanimously agreed that if this was an initial request by the property owner to construct this type of hardcover within the 0-75' zone, it would have been denied. Planning Commission that because of recommendation of th the sidewalk within the existing patio a was noted that if 1 Planning Commission Representative J. Diann Goetten stated the special circumstances, the Planning Commission was to only remove he 0-75' in front of the patio and leave nd sidewalk to house as is. Again, it his had been an initial request, the would have recommended denial. Mr. Monge stated that although the re -designed patio is not as desirable as the existing patio, they would rather take the re -designed patio than no patio at all. It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to authorize staff to draft. a resolution granting permission for the proposed 12'x18' rectangular patio and adjoining sidewalk as recommended by staff, and setting a deadline data of September 30, 1985 to removed existing patio and sidewalk to lake. Motion, Ayes (2), Nays (1). Councilmember Frahm voted nay. MINUTES OF THE REGUTAR ORONO COUNCII. MEETING HELD AUGUST 12, 1985. PAGE 5 i877 RICHARD PERRY/A. WHITE 440 & 450 WILLOW DRIVE SOUTH LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT RESOLUTION 11822 Mr. Richard Perry's attorney, Gary Phleger. was present on behalf of the applicants'. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the applicants' subdivision request to re -align a property lot line following a court settlement. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams to approve the Metes and Bounds Resolution #1822. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). #932 WARD EDWARDS 2474 CARMAN STREET VARIANCE RESOLUTION REVISIONS REQUEST FOR FURTHER REVIEW Mr. Ward Edwards was present for this review. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that since the last review it was discovered that substantial portions of the north side of the lagoon are designated wetlands and a major portion considered as f lood plain, which may have an impact on how this property can be utilized. An amended resolution has been drafted incorporating these items. Mr. Edwards has indicated discomfort with paragraphs: Finding No. 4, and Conditions No.5,6,&7; and staff has recommended revisions to the original draft. Mr. Edwards stated he has not requested a subdivision, but is simply requesting a building permit for a unique piece of property created in 1961. Councilmember Adams stated that the present wording seemed to be more clear in their intent. Councilmember Frahm stated that the resolution should contain a more positive statement, agreeing with the fact that the present wording indicates that the applicant is subdividing. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to authorize staff to re -draft the resolution changing the wording of paragraph Finding No. 4 and omitting paragraphs Conditions No.5,6,0., which will be adopted at the August 26th Council meeting, subject to approval by Mr. Edwards. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 12, 1985. PAGE 6 #936 I,AWRENCE GARDNER 1085 TONKAWA ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION #1823 Lynn & Lary Gardner were present for this matter. #938 ROBERT NASH 1020 TOWNLINE ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #1824 Asst. Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the applicants' request to A) regrade the lakeshore to conform more nearly to its original contours and B) remove various trees in lakeshore yard. Gaffron noted the Planning Commissions recommendation of A) approval subject to erosion control measures and B) removal and replacement of 4 overhanging trees only. City Engineer Cook indicated that there would be no drainage problems. It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to adopt Resolution #1823, granting a Conditional Use Permit, subject to a change in paragragh Findings A) to read "allowed to be removed". Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). Mr. Nash was not. present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the applicants' request to construct a pole barn 10' from the existing lot line where 150' setback is normally required and at least 150' from the adjoining residents. Asst. Zoning Administrator noted that approval has been obtained by the adjacent property owner. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to adopt Resolution #lb24 granting the variance as proposed. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). # 9 4 2 ARTHUR FINKELSTEI N 1 14 0 S HADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #1813 REVIFW ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Arthur & Dorothy Finkelstein were present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that since the Council reviewed this matter, it was found that Mr. Finkelstein's surveyor made an error in the hardcover calculation, which shows that the actual hardcover in the 75- 250' zone is 41.8% rather than 34.5%. Based on the hardcover error, Mr. Finkelstein was instructed to come back to the Council to determine if additional hardcover must be removed. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING IIE!,D AUGUST 12, 1985. PAGE 7 #942 FINKELSTEIN continued l944 JAMES LEAR 3127 CASCO CIRCLE VARIANCE Asst. Zoning Administrator Gaff ron submitted a list of area of hardcover that has been and can be removed. Gaf fron noted that to get back to the 34.5% hardcover as previously estimated, an additional 900 sq. feet of existing hardcover must be removed. Mr. Finkelstein indicated that there isn't that much hardcover that can be removed, especially in the 0-75' area, without getting into actual structure. Mrs. Finkelstein stated that they have removed a good portion of the existing hardcover in the 0-75' and would like to consider it an exchange for the high percentage of hardcover in the 75-250' area. Councilmember Frahm stated that he feels a good portion of the hardcover is not recognized as being actual hardcover. Frahm also indicated that he would like to see an exchange of the hardcover in the 0-75' area. Mr. Finkelstein stated that he felt they were being penalized for something they are not even changing, in fact, they are cooperating by willingly giving up existing hardcover. He also stated that he has no f uture intentions of adding any additional hardcover. Asst. Zoning Administrator Gaf f ron stated that the hardcover within the 0-75' that the applicants' have already removed has brought the percentage of hardcover down from 25.6% to approximately 20%. Gaffron stated that with the additional removal of area F (which is indicated on the survey), they would more than satisfy the exchange of hardcover. Mrs. Finkelstein requested that they be allowed to keep two sections of the sidewalk until something else is put in to avoid mud problems. Council agreed to allow the delay in removing the two sidewalk sections. It was moved :0y Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to authorize staff to re -draft Resolution #1813 reflecting the removal of item F and delay in removal of sidewalk sections, which will be approved at the August 26th Council meeting, subject to approval by the applicants'. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). Mr. James Lear and his landscaper, Robert A. Swanson, were present for this matter. MINUTES OF T11F. REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HFI,U AUC;U",I' 12, 1985. PAGF: � 1944 LEAR continued City Administrator Bernhardson explained the applicant's request for an after -the -fact variance for a landscaping fence placed 2' from right-of-way. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the fence is 40' in length and 6' high and creates no hazards or view problems. Mabusth referred to Mr. Lear's letter which listed many reasons for the fence, among them, the fence acts as a deterrent for children and pets running out into the street and blocking the view of an unkept park. Mr. Lear submitted some pictures of the fence and area for the Council to review. Mayor Butler stated that the unkept park across the street in in that condition due to the conditions made when the park was donated to the City. Mayor Butler felt that the answer to Mr. Lear 's problem with the fence would be cut of the top 2-1/2' of the fence to conform with the ordinance. Mr. Lear stated that his intent was to use the area for his kids soccer play and that a 6' fence acts as more of a safety deterrent than a 3-1/2' fence. Mr. Lear feels there is a traffic problem in that. area. Mr. Robert Swanson indicated his confusion as to why a 6' fence is not allowed but a 6' hedge of bushes is allowed. He also felt that the fence was aesthetically a plus. Councilmember Frahm stated that by allowing the applicant to retain his 6' fence would be setting a precedent for the entire neighborhood wanting 6' fences. Mr. Lear stated that he felt the fence would also deter the vandalism that he has been recently incurring. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to instruct staff to draft a resolution indicatii,g denial of the request due to no pertinent hardship. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). Mr. Lear voiced his disappointment, and felt he wanted to pursue this matter possibly through the media. #897 CHUCK i JANET PE:TERSON* 825 OLD LONG LAKE ROAD FINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #1825 It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Counci lmembo,r Frahm, to adopt Rusalut ion 01825 Approving the Plat of Club House Turn, per staff's recommentlat ion. Motion, Ayes ( 3) , Nays ( 0) . MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 1.2, 1985. PAGE 9 #694 THOMAS SARENPA 1670 SHADYWOOD ROAD REQUEST TO AMEND ORIGINAL VARIANCE APPROVAL Mr. Sarenpa was not present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the applicant h- . been granted a variance but has not completed all the work intended, and now requests to be a I l,;wed to leave the shed and slabs that were to be removed a6 conditions of being granted the original variance. In addition, applicant has added approximately 736 sq. ft. of hardcover since this was reviewed. Bernhardson stated that staff recommends the applicant submit a new application for the Planning Commission review. Zoning Administrator stated that Mr. Sarenpa ha ?n sent a copy of staff's recommendation. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to adopt staff's recommendation that the applicant go back to the Planning Commission with his request. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). 1985 JOINT USE DOCK LICENSES* RESOLUTIONS #1826 - 11832 It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to adopt Resolutions approving the following 1985 Joint Use Dock Licenses: Resolution #1826-Forest Arms Country Club Addition Homeowners Association Resolution #1827-Navarre C­ve Homeowners Association Resolution #1828-Fox Hill Homeowners Association Resolution #1829-Minnetonka Power Squadron -Big Island Resolution 01830-Victoria Estates Homeowners Assoc. Resolution #1831-Sandy Beach Place Resolution #1832-Walters Port Maintenance and Improvement Association Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). 3465 SHORELINE DRIVE RECOMMENDATION FOR SEWER UNIT CHARGES FOR L.AUNDROMAT USE Robert E. Gould, Minnie Cathers, and Elizabeth Sackrison were present for this matter. City Administrator 'Acrnhardson explained the situation of the property the �ove persons are interested in establishing a lau. nat requires them to pay on 19 sewer units. Bernhardson recommends that staff be instructed to establish something rea5onible and roport back to Council in two weeks. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII. MEETING HELD AUGUST 12, 1985. PAGE 10 3465 SHORELINE DR. continued Minnie Cathers and Elizabeth Sackrison submitted a petition (Exhibit A) signed by Navarre merchants asking the City to consider waiving the excessive amount of sewer units for the proposed laundromat property. It was moved by Councilmembei Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to table this matter until the August 26th Council meeting for staff to review and make a recommendation. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). CITY ENGINEER' 'PORT: CONTRACTOR'S REQUEST FOR PAYMENT* It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to approve payment to A.R.I. Contracting, Inc. for the Sanitary Sewer Improvements Crystal Bay Project as recommended. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). WILLOW DRIVE & 01 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD* NSA VARIANCE RESOLUTIONS 11833 6 #1834 It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to adopt the following Resolutions: Resolution #183- A Resolution setting a speed limit of 30 mph along Willow Drive near Fox Street and indemnifying the Minne- sota Dept. of Transportation from any claims as a result of setti-3 such speed limit. Resolution #1834 - A Resolution setting a speed 1: 30 mph along mold Crystal BaN from Co. Rd. d4 to Co. Rd. u .,d indemnifying the Minnesota Dept. of Transportation from all claims as a result of setting such .deed limit. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). MAYOR'S REPORT CABLE TV REPORT MARINA COMMITTE Bu ler did not report anything at this time. i' y Administrator Bernhardson updated the c' -il e..rding the Cable TV Franchising Monies. Thera was no report from the Marina Committee. TRANSPORTATION REPORT* COUNTY ROAD 15 It. was moved by Councilmember Adams, seC-nded by Counri lr►ember Frahm, t.o acr,ept staff's memr larding County Road 15. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). MINUTES ON THE REGULAR ORS. _il. MEETING AUGUST 12, 1985. PAGE I l CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: CRIME PREVENTION FUND It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Mayor Butler, to approve appointment of five people to serve as charter board members for the Orono Crime Prevention Fund as submitted and recommended by staff. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). LEAF COMPOSTING It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to accept staffs recommendation to Proceed with the proposed leaf composting program. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). BIG ISLAND VETERAN'S CAMP City Administrator Bernhardson submitted Resolutions for hazardous building proceedings for all the buildings on Big Island, and recommended the Council adopt them. Mr. Joe Backes, a Big Island property owner, and Mr. Jim Lund, representing the Veterans of Foreign Wars, were present for this matter. Mr. Lund requested the Council to postpone filing the resolutions with District Court because joint efforts are being n ie by the Board of Governors and State to bring these hazardous buildings into compliance. Mr. Lund stated that they are working on the funding at this time. City Administrator Bernhardson recommended tabling this matter for two weeks based on Mr. Lund's information and to avoid unnecessary court costs. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to adopt staff's recommendation to table this matter for two weeks. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). CONTRIBUTION REQUEST WEST ARM TREATMENT City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed his memo dated August q, 1985 regarding a contribution request for treatn.,:nts of West Arm. Staff has recommended this item be tabled indefinitely. FRITZLER/PETERSON* DEDICATION OF RIGHT OF WAY RESOL11Ti ON It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm,t, ccept dedication of (Chippewa bane) road right-of-way per SLaffIs recommendation. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIh MEFT1NG HELD AUGUST 12, 1985. PAGE 12 SMITH - POWERS MATTER* It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to accept staff's recommendation regarding the Smith - Powers Sewer matter. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). ORDINANCE NO.11* FIRE SPRINKLER FEES SECOND READING PERSONNEL RULES* It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to adopt Ordinance No. 11, Second Series, An Ordinance repealing a section of Ordinance 10, Second Series adopting the 1985 Fee Schedule. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to accept City Administrator Bernhardson's memo regarding Personnel Rules. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). COMPENSATION STUDIES* It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to accept City A, inistrator Bernhardson's memo regarding Compensation Stud_--s. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). ADMINISTRATOR'S GOAL SETTING* It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to accept City Administrator Bernhardson's memo regarding his Goal Setting. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). EASEMENTS TO DATE* IRVING ENGLISH* SALARY ADJUSTMENT HYDRAULIC SANDER* AUDITOR'S REPORT* FEDERAL FUNDS There were no easements to elate. It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to approve a step raise for Officer Irving English III, as recommended by staff. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to approve purchase of one hydraulic sander as recommended. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to accept the Audit Report of Federal Assistance Programs for 1984 as recommended by staff. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII. MEETING HELD AUGUST 12, 1985. PAGE l.i PUBLIC AUCTION* AUGUST 17, 1985 10:00 A.M. It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to approve the public auction to be hf;ld at 1285 South Brown Road on Saturday, August 17, 1985, at 10:00 A.M. per staff's recommendation. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). PAY TELEPHONE DONATION* It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to accept the donation of a pay telephone as requested by Chief Kilbo in his memo dated August 6, 1985. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). TEMPORARY APPOINTMENT* PATROL OFFICER It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Counci lmember Frahm, to approve the temporary appointment of a patrol officer as recommended and outlined in City Administrator Bernhardson's memo dated August 9, 1985. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION* It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to accept City Administrator Bernhardson's Information report regarding: 2695 Casco Point Rd., Crystal Bay Sewer -Change Order, Charles Henke, 3536 Lyric Avenue, Crystal Bay Road Report, 130 Cygnet Place, Krutzig Property-Bohn's Point, Highway 12 Corridor, Hennepin County VoTech, Orono -Long Lake -Medina Sewer, Appraiser, Rovegno Fence, Hardcover, and Riparian Access. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). CITY ATTORNEYS REPORT: CRYSTAL BAY APPEALS STATUS City Attorney Kathleen Blatz updated the Council on the status of the Crystal Bay Appeals. She stated that the property owners requested that thy special assessment appeals cases be consolidated which was denied because of a recent judicial block system order. Attorney Blatz stated that at this point the denial to consolidate may be changed and that the Judge has requested a brief from each party to be submitted within 30 days, and a decision will hP made at that time. ENFORCEMENT OF LMCD REGULATIONS City Attorney Blatz submitted a memo dated August. 12, 1985 regarding Enforcement of Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regulations. The Council discussed this matter briefly and no action was taken at this time. MINUTES OF T11E REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 12, 1985. PAGE 14 LICENSES* BILLS* It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to i•.,-)prove the following license: Fireworks Permit - Lorraine McGowan, 2184 Shadywood Road, for August 17 & 18, 1985 Motion, P•es (3), Nays (0). It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to approve payment of the All Funds Accounts and Liquor Store Accounts. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). ADJOURNMENT 10:01 PM It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to adjourn the regular Council meeting at 10:01 PM. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor COUNCIL ; PWING To: Mayor Butler Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator -2 Orono Council Members ��� ' From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator CITY OF MONO Date: August 21, 1985 Subject: a) #852 Stanley Gregory, 1410 Shoreline Drive - Conditional Use Permit - Installation of decorative pond - second review by Council - tabled at 7/22/85 meeting pending staff's resolution and recommendation for procedurally dealing with the alleviation of designated wetlands. b) #927 Stanley Gregory, 1410 Shoreline Drive - Multiple Variances for Swimming Pool a) #852 Staff recommendation regarding construction of decorative pond - alteration and installation of wildlife pond to be reviewed at a later meeting. Review of application since last reviewed by Council - Staff met with the following individuals on August 1 to discuss the total Gregory application: Mr. & Mrs. Gregory Greg Kopischke, Applicant's Engineer/Planner Glenn Cook, City Engineer Jim Mahady, MCWD Joel Settles, U.S. Soils Office Dr. Richard Hanson, FWBI It became apparent early into the discussion that the decorative pond proposed was viewed as minimal in scope and considered to have little if any negative impact on water quality or quantity. Retention is improved, aeration will preserve water quality. The subject area is not a wetland but a retention area - runoff flows directly from area out to lake via southern culvert. The open pond at a depth of 4 feet will now serve as a sediment trap - ridding runoff of the heavier sediment particules. Currently, severe rainfalls could permit the heavier or larger sediment to run directly into the lake. The "experts" see no problem with allowing independent construction of the decorative pond as long as the following is addressed: 1. The question of the maintenance of the desired water level must be resolved. Does the applicant plan to pump water from the main lake or install an independent well. They advise that droughts or dry periods will effect the water level of the pond constructed at the 929.4 elevation. 2. Plans for the temporary overflow outlet to the southern culvert must designate elevation of outlet, channel construction, cross pro- file of channel (banks to be at 7:.1 slope (horizontal :vertical) desig- nated to encourage return of vegetation. Channel to northern wetland will not be constructed until wildlife pond alteration is resolved. Zoning Files #852 and #927 August 21, 1985 Page 2 3. City staff tc determine need for fabric liner within excavated pond - mixed views of experts on this issue. 4. Final grading and landscaping plans for banks of pond, temporary channel to southern culvert and upland slopes within watershed. As staff advised in an earlier memo, the City has a Conservation & Flowage Easement over the 3/4 acre retention area. The applicant may wish to amend the original easement to more closely reflect the retention area of new pond. If the applicant plans to pump water from main lake to maintain desired water level in pond, the DNR must approve via permit. Staff is not able to report back to you on the wildlife alteration because we await confirmation by the participating experts of the written report drafted by the City Administrator that summarized the findings and recommendations discussed at our August meeting. We expect to report back to the Council at your October 7th meeting. If Council has no problem with the division of the original proposal in granting separate approval for the decorative pond alteration so that the applicants can commence the installation this fall, staff recommends approval of the temporary alteration based on the following findings: 1. The construction of the decorative pond as currently proposed will have no detrimen 1 effects on the original or total project. 2. The current proposal could be approved as an independent project and its successful operation does not hinge or depend on the alteration of the upper wetland. 3. The current proposal as amended by staff and experts will provide increased retention, provide a much needed sediment trap and improve the quality of the water that enters the lake with the aeration of the pond. Direct staff to draft an approving resolution for action at your next meeting. XXXX WESTWOOD PLANNING & July Z'> , 11A V) MEMORANI)MI TO: Mr. & Mrs. William Gregory R*w o! 'ja POW" W 4V ENGINEERING COMPANY I 26PA C1 Jeanne Mabusth - City of Orono Glenn Cook - Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. Dr. Richard Hanson - Gray Freshwater Biological Institute Joel Settles - Hennepin Conservation District Jim Mahady - Hickok & Associates (Minnehaha Creek Watershed) FROM: iiac;q Kupsic;Ike RE: Uregory Residence Proposed Wetland Alteration 1410 Shoreline Drive This memo is to confirm the following meeting: Date: August 1, 1985 - Thursday Time: 9:00 A.M. Place: Orono City Council Chambers 1275 Brown Road South Among the items to be discussed are the following: OF ORONO - Impact on water quality as a result of the alteration. - Monitoring of the wetland as to the appropriate type, base line data collection or other standard for comparison,frequency and durafiura of monitoring, who will perform the tests, costs involved and who will be responsible for costs. - Restoration of the altered wetland should impact prove negative including the standards by which to evaluate impact and the type, extent and potential impact of re-.0orEat ion. Extent tetid cost of construction inspecticx) by the City. Amcxmt of City security coats. - Cutisti-ticLial scheduling and type of dredrling. Use of fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides in or adjacent to the wetlands arnt how close is "adjacent". Please feel free to add items as may to appropriate or ctMTlacl me prior to the NK!etinq should you have any (luestiuns. 1415 WAYZATA 9OUIEVAND, MINNEA►00% MINNESOTA S5416 4612) 5460ISS Zoning File #852 and #927 August 21, 1985 Page 3 b) i927 Lakeshore setback and hardcover variances - separation setback to permit construction of an accessory structure. Zoning District - LR-lB Revised Applicatton Pertinent Ordinances a) 10.21 Subdivision 1 - Lakeshore Setback b) 10.21 Subdivision 2 - Lakeshore Hardcover c) 10.03 Subdivision 12 - Crowding Principal Building A) Lakeshore Setback required = 75' proposed a 53' variance = 22' or 29% B) Lakeshore Hardcover allowed 0 existing 27 s.f. or .042% (approved within application #863 for reti,ining wall within lakeshore yard) proposed 100 s.f. or .155% if pervious surfacing is not considered hardcover or 1200 s.f. or 1.86% if pervious surface is hardcover. C) Accessory Structure Setback - Greenhouse from Pool required - 10' proposed - 514" variance - 418" or 48% List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Addendum Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Original Survey by Egan, Field & Nowah Exhibit E - Report by Applicant's Consuitant Exhibit F - Revised Site Plan Exhibit G - Lakeshore Section - Underground Drainage/Filter System Exhibit H - Hardcover Fact Sheet Exhibit I - City Engineer's Report Exhibit ,T - Planning Commission Minutes of 7/15/85 The applicant seeks lakeshore setback, hardcover and separation set- back variances to install a pool 211x32' located 53' to 59' from the Lakeshore. The proposal also includes an 81x22' greenhouse addition at- tached to the garage. There would be a 5'4" separation between the pool and the greenhouse along a 16 foot wide secton of the pool. The principal structure is currently under construction - completion date at this F;uint Is not known. Zoning File #852 and #927 August 21, 1985 Page 4 The F )erty consists of approximately 8+ acres in area. Review Exhibit D, old survey that shows the lakeshore yard. The lakeshore yard is limited uy the following: 1. Steep topography along lakeshore and north west 2. Septic drainfield located to west of house 3. Narrowing of lot along west shoreline 4. Location of existing caretakers house In the early planning stages for the development of this property, the City was asked to grant a side setback variance from the caretaker's house of 10 feet rather than the minimum setback of 20 feet to provide just the right location for the principal structure. Early site plans revealed a septic test area northeast of the princi- pal structure and the pool located in the current septic envelope. The original septic site would require pumping and a decision was made to relocate septic area to the west of the residential structure. If the pool was relocated west of the present septic envelope in the only available flat area, the pool would be placed closer to the lakeshore than the current proposed location. The applicant has asked if consideration can be given for the abundant land area to the north and east of the house that will not be developed. In review of the hardcover calculations (Exhibit H), it would appear that hardcover is not a problem out of the 75 foot setback zone. The question is what kinds of trade-offs are acceptable in the case of excesses of hardcover within the 75' setback area for new construction. Review of hardships stated in Kopisctike's report (Exhibit I): A) Area further west of primary septic site 1. Potential conflict with the septic system drainfield 2. Exposed location to Tanager Lake which limits privacy and impacts neighbors across the lake. 3. Area would require tree removal & grading to create a flat aria and would encroach into the lakeshore setback to within a Lout 40 feet of the waters edge. 4. Too far f rom house. B) Area northwest of the existing house - site suggested by staff for your June 17th review. 1. Steep side slopes (aproximateiy 15-20 foot drop) creates a very difficult construction situation which could start to encroach into the existing tree cover. 2. hnrth facing slope and orientation is not desirable for pool. use. Zoning File #852 anti #927 August 21, 1985 Page 5 3. Location does not relate to the house use and traffic patterns. 4. Location is risible to train and pedestrian traffic along the railroad which restricts privacy. The applicant asks the City to consider the area to the south of the existing hou,ae/garage and requests approval of this location based on the following findings and hardships: 1. Flat slopes adjacent to the walkout level of t►.e garage. 2. Close relationship to the house, showers, restroom and storage while have a separation from other activity areas of the house. Sunny location and orientation. 4. Tree cover along the lakeshore provides screening from neighbors and the lake while providing privacy for the pool user. Hat -cover Considerations The applicant claims the only true hardcove ound the pool within the 0-75' setback area is the 85 square feet of coping around U pool and 15 square feet of deck. The remaining improvement of some 1100 square feet involves the use of grass areas and b�-)ardwalk (Exhibit G). Review Cook's comments (Exhibit I), he feels the underdrain system is very preliminary in nature and reluires greater detail before he could render judgement as to classi` ion of hardcover but does ask that drainage tiles be directed to marsh ather than lake as currently proposed. He does also contend that th adequate area out of the 75 feet setback area to locate the pool. Plannin.�,C ision Recommendation Majority opinion moved to deny the multiple variance applicatic! Stanley Gregory based on the following findings: 1. The innovative material or construction cannot be considered nois- hardcrover based on current policy. 2. Early planning decision made by applicant or authorized agents of applicant created the need for the variance. 3. Hardships •sented by applicant are not valid when dealing with new construction and site planning -- good planning coui. have alleviated all need for variances. 4. There are other locations (one to the northwest side of house) for the proposed pool outside of the protected area. Zoning File #852 and #927 August 21, 1985 Page 6 5. Variances cannot b- nted for the convenience of an applicant but must be based on ci rct"at, Lances unique to the property. Minority Opinion To approve the multiple variance application of Stanley Gregory based on the following findings and hardships: I. Topography of property 2. Decrease need Iremove trees 3. Septic system ..-)cation 4. Pool is a reasonable use 5. Pool is not hardcover Council Action To give conceptual direction to staff so that a final resolution can be drafted for action at your next meeting. CITY OF OR9NO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial AppIicatiori Fee ,1.5.00 (S50.00 per ers a I1 .: I 1! 7 Af ter -the -Fa• --t. Fees --------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTI LOCATION Si }e Address�_�•� 1 1- i•operty Ic _►itif i. in Number (P. I . D. ) a1 //7 - of _3 9 Please check one -- Is the property abstract. or torrens? /7- Please attach legal description to r ? i,. .t n if not included �on required ------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name d (U Phone I J Mailing Address z,i OWNER Phonc 1 3 - Gj,)l "1 _ X.tiling Address Property Acquired,,.� (month; year) I( _ao) (do not) also o� n the adjacent s of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY F:•csent Zoning District Pr,_ sent Use of Proper • Residcntia� specs f __ DESCRIP% -)N OF PEQUEST F,stimated Constructio : Cost $ Describe r. request in do-t a _ 1 : ---------------------------------------------------------------------- VARIAN'8S REQUIRED Lot. Area Ir.)t W.itith Satback ar:ancvs !_ Front _ H.: rdco-,. er Sid( _ Rear HARDSHIP Descri'.i.- undue hirdshir) enforceA'ent of zoninq or practical difficulty resulting from strict. e DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual roper,ty cundi ions prev Fang compliance wi h Zoning Code Requirements: r --- �`Z--------`Q't"`-------------------- -------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Applicatiop Form. 2. Certifi . Lr.operty OwncrF L: st of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Her -•lain County Department .f Finance A-603 Gov -nen.t -eater 348-3271 ) 3. Stamped: lega 1 sized envelopes ( x 10 ) pre -addressed h . names or. I he above list with no return address. -tificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this appli-,ation. Please remember that your variance application is rot ^_omplcte if the above information has not keen included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant herehv egrets to provide all information requires' Ur reque,,ted by the Toning Adminis '-or, agrees to Fray all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in reviewof this a^- -ation, and certifies that the .information sup^:ied is true and correct to t est of his/her knowledgo. CC Applicant's sign-iture, OWNERS ISIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowle6ges and agrees to this -applir-ation and further authorizes reasonable E':,,t: -- or-r.o the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission membe. s, anu Coup merribers for purposes of investigation rind verificati.-n of this request. c aer':. signature rb . CCC_ � I Date J B a ems, --- - - - t- - -________--------_-_ 'pplicant must haV1 all suhu,)t,als inter tht:. city offices 25 days before the .anning Commis:>re!n Mvi . ;nq. Fl:--nniny t'c -nission mvetings are held on the third Monday of each month. p,t,,,� pxi+ian xr12 ,e-� u-, (C- 4;-Y- r-- (o c � L J�n q6 o c) SA-4 cam c..o ca + 01-4�Im - ne�z)u-) ClXz-a eL-Oeclev old-.,o lke:;, T L-) LA-1 0 T--12� 1 _ . ��., 4al) paof C 02-117-23 33 0003 Albert Hanser 1685 Fox Street Wayzata,MN 55391 Certified Properties Owners List Zoning File #927 02-•117-23 33 0001 Richard Perkins 1485 Fox Street Wayzata, MN 55391 02-117-23 33 0002 David & Anne Duff George Capp 1420 Shoreline Drive 1465 Fox Street Wayzata, MN 55391 Wayzata, MN 55391 EXHIBIT Edward Hamm 408 St. Peter St. Paul, MN Street 55102 t XXXXI July 3, 1985 Ms. Jean Mabusth City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RE: Gregory Residence 1410 Shoreline Drive; Wayzata, MN City File: 927 Dear Ms. Mabusth: On behalf of the applicant, Mr. 6 Mrs. William Gregory, we ate submitting the following request for consideration by the City Planning Commission and Council. For reasons that will be fully explained later in this letter, three (3) variances are proposed to accommodate construction of a 21' x 32' pool adjacent to a future greenhouse and the existing house. These variance requests are: 1. Lakeshore Setback The proposed pool is setback 53 to 59 feet from the lakeshore. This average 56 foot setback represents a variance of 19 feet from the required 75 foot setback. 2. Lakeshore Rardcover A total of 100 square feet (85 square feet pool coping; 15 square feet hard surface deck) of hardcover is proposed within the 0-75 foot setback. This represents a 0.155% increase (see attached calculations) over the allowed coverage of 0.0%. 3. Accessory Structure Setback The pool, an accessory structure, is proposed to setback 5'-4" from the future greenhouse and principal structure. This is a 4'-8" variance from the required 10 foot setback. This variance is required only for a 16 foot wide area where the pool is adjacent to the greenhouse. The site topography has offered severe limitations to the overall site planning process. The steep slopes, soils, ground form and vegetation in addition to zoning code setbaeks, have contributed to restrictions on locating the buildings, entry eourt, driveway, pool and septic system. The present building locations on the top of the slopes was found to provide the best site utilization by minimizing potential negative site impact. The proposed pool re -location is a result of these restrictions. Various site locations have been explored. F41S WA►ZATA 0OULIVAAO. UMN[AIOUi. 101NN1l0IA 66420 iAtll $MO•M July 3, 1985 Ms. Mabusth Page 2 A. The area west of the house was the original proposed pool location. Here it minimized site impact by being located along the top of the slopes, met the 75 foot lakeshore setback and related to the house use patterns. This location was later determined to be the primary septic drainfield site and the only location where a,gravity septic system could be installed. With the septic system now in place here, a hardship to the Owner has been created to find an acceptable alternate pool location based on the site constraints and zoning regulations. An alternative of moving the pool further west along this crest was explored but rejected based on the following: - Potential conflict with the septic system drainfi-id - Exposed location to Tanager Lake which limits privacy and impacts neighbors across the lake. - Area would require tree removal & grading to create a flat area and would encroach into the lakeshore setback to within about 40 feet of the waters edge - To:s far from house B. The area northwest of the existing house meets the required building setbacks but is considered an unacceptable alternative location for the following reasons: - Steet side slopes (approximately 15-20 foot drop) creates a very difficult construction situation which could start to encroach into the existing tree cover - North fac;:ig slope and orientation is not desirable for pool use - Location does not relate to the house use and traffic patterns - Location is visible to train and pedestrain traffic along the railroad which restricts privacy C. The location south of the existing house/garage is the proposed alternative to be considered by the Planning Commission and Council. It is the same location reviewed on June 17, 1985 by the Planning Commission at which time action was tabled. This site is most desirable for the following reasons: - Flat slopes adjacent to the walkout level of the garage. - Close relationship to the house, showers, restroom and storage while having a separation from other activity areas of the house. - Sunny lecatton and orientation. - Tree cover along the lakeshore provides screening from neighbors and the lake while providing privacy for the pool user. July 3, 1985 Ms. Mabusth Page 3 As noted at the beginning of this letter, this location will require three variances concerning lakeshore setback, lakeshore hardcover and accessory structure setback. 1. Lakeshore Setback This proposed pool location varies from the plan reviewed on June 17 in that is has been moved about 5 feet further away from the lake. The nearest point ::ill be 53 feet from the water. With an average setback of 56 feet, the requested variance would be 19 feet from the required 75 foot setback. This setback would also move the pool outside the DNR 50 foot structure setback. 2. Lakeshore Hardcover The requested hardcover has been reduced significately from the plan reviewed on June 17. A total of only 100 sgaure feet within the 75 foot setback is now requested. Of this, 85 square fe?t will be the pool edge coping strip and 15 square feet will be ha-d surface deck area. As shown on the attached plan, the only hard surface proposed is that between the pool and the garage/greenhouse and is almost entirely outside the 75 foot setback. This is for practical reasons of maintenance, pool use and access into the house and storage area. The remainder of the gri gown on the plan will be a pattern of pervious surface where a .-ombination of grass areas and boardwalk will be utilized. The boardwalk will be a wood deck module set on and into a rock bed and flush with the pool and adjacent ha-d surface. A geotechnical filter fabric will underlay the rock to allow water passage thru to the natural soil while acting as a weed/vegetattc barrier. The ground form will hold the rainfall/runoff within this rock bed to help control water quality and compensate for the 100 square foot hard surf+- irea within the lakeshore setback (see attached detail). A small 6 inch perforated P.V.C. pipe and filter fabric will be located at a low collection point to allow a slow, controlled outlet for runoff. _1s water pervious surface will also be used as much as possible beyond the 75 fiot setback to reduce potential hard surface coverage, also to help compensate for the requested hard surface within 75 feet. 3. Accessory Structure Setback The pool will have a setback of 5'-4" to the greenhouse and 13'-8" to the house/garage. This will require a variance of 4'-8" from the required 10 foot setback for a 16 foot wide area between the pool and greenhouse. July 3, 1985 Ms. Mabusth Page 4 These proposed setbacks are based on the following reasons: - To move the pool aq far out of the 75 foot lakeshore setback as possible and out of the 50 foot DNR setback. - To maintain a 10 foot or more setback adjacent_ to the house/ greenhouse for as much distance as possible. - The desire to have a pool of 21 feet in width which helps the safety concern of people, especially children, dieing from the short side of the pool. Emergency access can be accomplished to the east, south and west the pool easily and within the 13 foot setback on the north of the pool adjacent to the building entry/exit points. Again, the only restriction will be for a 16 foot wide area by the greenhouse. The pool can also act a convenient water reservoir for fire protection. In summary, the site, zoning qulstions and construction requirements have offered limitations to site u,i,ization. The required locations for the septic system necessitated moving the pool and created a hardship in finding an acceptable alternative location on this restricted site. These conditions of hardship include steep topog:*,phy, narrow area west of the house, existing vegetation and general unique character of the property in relationship to required zoning setbacks. The proposed po-.)1 use is permitted within the LR-1A district. The proposal will not alter the character of the locality. The proposed compensations for hard surface cover Lo control water quality and runoff along with efforts to move the pool out of the lakeshore setback as much as possible and minimize :he accessory structure setback variance, ire made to keep with the spirit and Intent of the zoning code. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me. Sin .erely, WESTW001- PLANNING 6 ENCII NQEFR I NG COMPANY Greg Kopischke GK/nd cc: Mr. 6 Mrs. Wt i; i am Cr(-gory I T►w' -:1 4' �, ?L- A "kPCOt, �, r-L 97-9.41 J NOR-MAL WAi'F�- r%AZK- A.-7ION - HA7-D Sl1RFAt,�/ Pr�u1NC� 0,1ST HOuS'�, P�SMT V,�- 953. 952.V FuTu9- 6.R-EENNOL;`� POOL Ap-eA m ,0 \-R.I;TAIHINI ,4AL� EL 950. Os \TOP Or RAr,17-AL, SL.OP� V1��TA-CtON .v5a96 my 38s 1440 tNOQ- AA"e- D¢, it - a `ww LAItPe.?NOR-t-- t ► IN P U��6�OR-Y R-�SID�NGfG 1410 SNOB-�I.IN� rJR�V� an.. 't 5 NO �)GAI.�-- LAKESHORE SETBACK HONE r _ i� 0-75' 5-250' 50-500' 00-1000, )irections s A. Existing lot area in zone ORONO HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET B. Ex is' C. F.xi �ing hhardcover percentage in zc. ( (B:A) x 100] D. Proposed E. Proposed " hardcover hardcove Per/- ,tage in zone( (D x 1001 G9O\JIV war a percen.tag- `o C� sf Z sf 100 r, f 0.155 `/0 0 e42 sf Z rle sf IK fl we, sf % 75 i s R f 2 % s g -- ----9 30 sf sf �� sf °fib 35 A. Existing Lot Area in Zone - includes the total square fo^taq,!: of dry buildable !-:nd within the specified zone. B. Existing Hardcover in Zone - incl---s the square footage of existing r---)fs, decks, side%. -.a, driveways (gravel or paved) and c it rain-imper-Inus eurfacee within w-he spec'!ied zone. C. Existing Hardcover Percen' ,-ge - u We 'he number in p by the r Rmber in A_ and ^+ult iply by 100. D. Proposed Hardcover in Zone - includder .:� fisting hardcover p" .s all proposee °ddi.tional hardcover. -- E. Proposed Hardcove_• Percentages - divi,te the number in D by the number in A_ nuitiply by 100. F. Allo•• d Hardcover Percentager: if '-e percentages in column E for any setback o exceed the &.lowed percentages in column F, .-cu should cot -tact the Zoning JcNartment a- 473-7357 to discuss the possibilities of obta .,:,,:•; a variance. veneralD -.f a concurrent ,-)val of existing hardcover matches t'ie additi.• it hardcover proposeA —sulting in no net incre4se of h3� ic,. •ver in a s;:,ecified zone, a variance may not ?�e necessary. a+. 2335 '1f/. '1wb rY.Aa...� 36 s1 n..a Afa. 55ff3 PA.... &.2.636-4600 July 18, 1985 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Jeanne Mabusth Re: Our File No. 139-927 Gregory Application Dear Jeanne, f Nln (, Rnwnlrw. /' f R.dwn R kn.rnr P I R..dJmr/ 4 1.. 1w,j I' f R,All.d I T..nr•P I J.— r (Mnrn P f VLm'U`vl�� It22SM i T ._ Gltaw A ( .Y.. P f An/A A oludae, P f Tr....w. f M1nr�l. P f k.. food W f wiff. P f RaA.II G Sek.* A/ P f [ .,..Old ( Rmpra P I Jr... 4 Aua.dna. P I Me-& A H.nroa, P I Ted A f.nd. P f MM'A.N T Pownw. , P f Ro/wr R P fefjn.. P f Pw. d [.aura.. P f A fnOw. 1M M Piw.Nrr We have reviewed the plan submitted for the pool on the Gregory property. There a, irs to be adequate room on the property to avoid placing the pool within the 75 foot setback. The proposed underdrain system for mitigating the additional hard cover is very preliminary in nature. The preliminary details could be expanded and worked into an acceptable plan. We would recommend as a minimum that all overflows from the system be directed easterly to the marsh area rather than to the lake. If you have any question;, ploast, contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. ,et- R GCE. Glenn R. t;urrk I;RC: s-fs u MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 11FLD JULY 15, 1985. PAGE. 4 #852 STANLEY GREGORY 3. Payment of fees for the many inspections to be made by Orono staff during construction period. 4. Applicant to hire outside agency to perform water tests per City's monitoring scheJ ule. 5. Written confirmation by applicants that FWBI and U.S. Soils Office may perform required tests on site. b) No use of chemic,..L agents in control of algae and aquatic vegetation. In addition the City will ask that al; use of fertilizers, hericides and pesticides i areas adjacent to ponds c) City to approve type of dredging to be employed with wildlife restoration. d) Four agencies must approve the proposed contruction: DNR, MCWD, U.S. Soils Of f ice and FWBI. e) Base Line check to be done to check the discharge currently from the culvert in Browns Bay. Motion, Ayes (4), nays (0). T�927 STANLEY GREGORY 41 SHORELINE DRIVE V IANCE SECOND REVIEW Mr. & Mrs. Gregory were present. !-eq Kopischke of Westwood Planning & Engineerinc, was also pre- sent. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that there is at least 1200.s.f. of inovative materials, proposed as non -hardcover within the 0-75' setback area. Fopischke has submitted a plan for use of a comb- ination _)f grass and boards as non -hardcover. Since the pool has been moved 5' away from the lakeshore, it does not need approval from the DNR. The closest point of the pool away from the Lake- shore is 53'. Kopischke stated that the deck would be a c:ombinatien decking/boardwalk syste^n - a framed system grid. This same system is int ted through- out the rest of the project. The end effect would a l l ow water movement through it . There would be gr.ivel underneath. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FIELD JULY 15, 1985. PAGE 5 1927 STANLEY GREGORY Chairman Kelley stated that his concern was what happens if the house is sold. We have no control over the new owners taking up this non -hardcover and replacing it with cement. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that is why it is important to recognize the innovative non - hardcover within the resolution to be filed against the chain of title of the property. We are also looking at lakeshore setbacks, hardcover and a separation setback. Chairman Kelley clarified that the greenhouse and the pool will be 5'4" apart for a length of 16'. He noted the 10 foot separation is required to allow emergency vehicles access. Kopischke stated that this area is very difficult to access anyway, and this is such a small area. Even if you cannot get vehicles there, the human body can certainly funtion around the pool. Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed the City Engineer's report: he certainly wouldn't approve drainage going towards the lake, and would not ad- dress the hardcover issue at this stage without adequate monitoring. Cook would prefer drainage to go towards the east or the north, but not towards the lake. Taylor noted that even if the material is accept- able as non -hardcover, the slope of the drainage might determine whether or not it was adequate. Kopischke explained that what is trying to be done is to set up an underground system such that the water is going to move through the decking and down through the gravel and underneath the gravel will be a technical fabric which will allow water to move through. We anticipate that the grade will be relatively flat such that it will allow the water to move down as much as possible. The pipe was not intended to take all the water out - but merely to keep bottom dry. Chairman Kelley moved, Goetten seconded to recom- mend denial a setback, hardcover and accessory structure variance for Stanley Gregory, 1410 Shore- line Drive finding that the ordinance permits 75' setback and the proposal is 53', the hardcover in the 0-7',' should be 01 and also finding that: 4 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 15, 1985. PAGE 6 #927 STANLEY GREGORY 1. The material discussed is not considered non - hardcover. 2. Early planning decision made by applicant or authorized agents of applicant created the need for the variance. Kopischke noted that the architect has worked with this property; a very unique piece of property with a very limited area because of the sloping and vegetation. The pool had been located, as noted, in the septic area, what was finally approved as the primary septic field, and this has created a hardship in that another area had to be found. Motion, Ayes (3), Nayes (1) McDonald voted nay because of the following: 1. The topography of the property 2. The removal of trees 3. The septic system location 4. The pool is a reasonable use 5. Does not consider the pool hardcover #876 RANDY ASPLUND 3444 EASTLAKE STREET VARIANCES SECOND REVIEW Randy Asplund, the applicant, was not present. Mr. & Mrs. Monge, the owners of the property, were present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the application. Council recommended the patio to be removed by the end of July and referred the item back to the Planning Commission to look at separate locations or to look at a special type of "floating deck". A floating deck is a structure built of 2x4's sitting upright with spacing, sets on the ground and is mobile. It is not anchored to the ground but is probably too heavy to be portable. One of the options of staff is to consider a deck attached to the house that is treated with certain spacing and certain base materials that would be of less of an encroachment. We now have the hardcover numbers - 75-250' just the area within the lot line 38.5%; if credit is to be given for Outlot B it reduces the percent to 28.6%. Out lot B holds the septic system drainfield and serves as the access roadway for the three properties. Taylor noted that the slope from the house to the lake is very shallow. TO: Council PROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE: 8/22/85 BUBJBCT: #876 - Dean Monge/Asplund, 3444 Eastlake Street - variance - resolution Attached is a resolution reflecting the Council's actions of August 12, 1985 regarding the Monge/Asplund variance request. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 FILE 1876 WHEREAS, Dean & Nancy Monge (hereinafter "the appli- cant") are owners of the property located at 3444 Eastlake Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: I.ot 2, Block 1, Bayside Beach (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipai Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the construction of a patio located less than 75 feet from the lakeshore, where no structures or hardcover are normally allowed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File i876. 2. The property is located in the LR-lA Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 15, 1985, and recommended partial approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings ane4 conditions: A) The original applicant, Randy Asplund, construct:!,, the concrete patio within the 75' setback area without consulting the City to determine whether such a structure was allowed. B) The new owners, the Monges, purchased the property from Asplund after the patio was constructed and were not notifies, by Asplund that the patio miqht have to be removed. C) The existing patio is located totally within the 0- 75' lakeshore setback area, and with the adjacent side- walks in the 0-75' setback area constitutes approxi- mately 489 square feet of hardcover or 7.5%. Page 1 of 5 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. D) Planning Commission recommended that a partial variance be granted. The sidewalk between the patio and the lake should be removed, leaving 318 square feet of hardcover or 4.9% in the 0-75' setback area. 4. The City Council reviewed this application on July 22, 1985, and August 12, 1985 and made the following additional findings: A) The applicants have not shown an adequate hardship to justify the granting of a variance to :allow the existing excessive amounts of hardcover to remain in the 0-75' setback area, because this is new construction and with proper planning the need for a variance could have been avoided. B) The applicants do have a hardship based on. the small lot size (0.38 acre in a 2-acre zone), which unusually small lakeshore lot was allowed by the City to be created in order to reduce the intense use of Stubbs Bay by the marina which previously occupied the property. C) The remainder of the property, in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone, contains only the driveway, sidewalks and house as hardcover, constituting 3,869 square feet or 38.7% hardcover. This amount of hard- cover, although exceeding the normal limits, is neces- sary to the safe and reasonable use of the property. D) The applicants have submitted an alternate proposal for a patio which encroaches only 5' into the 0-75' lakeshore setback area, and after removal of the existing patio and portion of sidewalk between the existing patio and the lake, constitutes approximately 110 square feet of hardcover in the 0-75' setback area, or 1.7%, and will increase the 75-250' hardcover by 125 square feet, or up to 4,018 square feet or 40.0%. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 9 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1' The City Counci 1 finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to pre- serve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the construL.ion of a patio to be located partically within the 0-75 foot lakeshore setback zone where no structures or hardcover are normally allowed subject to the following conditions: 1. Per the directiv,- of Resolution 1768, adopted by the Council on May 28, 1965, the existing concrete patio in the 0-75' lakeshore setba,7k zone, and the existing concrete sidewalk between said patio and the lake, shall be removed by September 30, 1985. 2. A new patio of dimensions 121x18' which encroaches 5' into the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone, is hereby allowed to be constructed, incorporating the existing portion of sidewalk between the house and the existing patio. 3. Based on the above conditions, the following hardcover areas are approved for this property: (0-75' Lot Area - 6,550 s.f.) (75-250' Lot Area - 10,050 s.f.) 0-75' Zone: approximately 110 s.f. allowed, inclu.:inq 5'xl8' patio portion and 20 s.f. existing sidewalk area, constituting in total 1.7% hardcover. 75-250' Zone: House 'nd Garage 2,335 s.f. Driveway 1,072 s.f. Hack -up Pad 270 s.f. Sidewalk and Stoop 192 s.f. Patio Portion and Sidewalk 125 s.f. Existing Sidewalk at Pear of ilous:, 24 s . f . 4,018 s.f . or 40.fl* Paqe 3 of 5 City of OR ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4. The total improvement of the property is limited to the hardcover amounts described in # 3 above, and the owner of the property is hereby advised that the City will not ap- prove any future improvements which increase• hardcover, and if such improvements are proposed they might be approved only with concurrent removals of existing hardcover. 5. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 26, 1986). 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and Shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. The undersigned applicant has read, und-rstood and here- by agrees to the terms of thi: resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title cf the property. Adopted by the Orono City Councii on this 26th day of August, 1985. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clark Mary C. Butler, Mayor ( 1 ) Property Ow,,er rage 4 of 5 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ----- STATE"'Ox MINNESOTA COU—Y OF HENNEPIN On this _ day of it 1985 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE. OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF IIENNEPIN ) On this day of , 1985, before me a Notary Public within and for Eaid County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 5 of 5 OU-NOL LUTING To: crono Council Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning A�waticlFYow o Date: August 21, 1985 Subject: #932 Ward Edwards, 2474 Carman Street - Variance - Final Resolution Attached is the re -draft of the resolution as directed by Council on August 12, 1985. Mr. Edwards has been mailed a copy of the resolution; as of this writing he has not had a chance to respond with his approval or rejection of it. Presume that it meets his OK unless I pull it off the consent agenda Monday night. city of OR ONO ri RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A 'vAkIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 & 2 AND SECTION 10.44, SUBDIVISION 8 - FILE #932 WHEREAS, Ward E. Edwards (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 2474 Carman Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 11, Block 6, Townsite of Langdon Park (hereinafter "the property"); ar:i WHEREAS, the applican' ;iaa applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning 'ode Sections 10.22, Subdivision 1 and 10.55 Subdivision 8 to allow the construction -f a new home located partially within the 0-75' lakeshore setback area where no structures :e allowed, and requesting a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow a total of 2,960 square feet of hardcover or 15.8t in the 0-75' setback zone at the building site, where rio hardcover is allowed and to allow 3,390 square feet of hardcover or 30.0% in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone at the building site, where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed, and is requesting a variance to the average lakeshore setback from the lagoon or north side of the building site. NOW, THEREFORE HE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnencta: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as zoning file 1932. The portion of the property to be used as a building site is located in the LR-lB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District, and the portion of the property north of the lagoon is zoned LR-1C-1, One -Family Lakeshore Residential Subdistrict. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application c.. June 17, 1985, and recommended approval of the propose, variance based upon the following findings: A) No lot width vat sance is required since the 125' lot width meets 60% or more of the, 140' requirra+et:t . B) A number of methods can be used in determining the actual percentages of hardcover on the property: Page lot 5 e:. City of ORONO RESOLUTICII OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. (1) Based on crediting only the land a building site, the 0-75' hardcover proposed is 2, 96u -,,are feet or 15.8% and in the 75-250' zone is 3,380 square feet or 30.0%. (2) Based on also crediting the northerly portions of the property for the hardcover calculations,0-75' hardcover is 2,960 square feet or 10. 5% acid in the 75-250' zone is 3,380 square feet or 10.2%. (3) Based on calculating 0-75' and 75-190' from the lagoon, only crediting the building site, and with drainage all directed to the lagoon,0-75' lagoon setback hardcover is 14.9% (all existing driveway), in the 75- 190' lagoon setback is 34.4%, and in the lakeshore 0-50' setback is 0%. C) Applicant should not be penalized for the existing driveway hardcover in the lagoon 0-75' zone, and in fact his driveway proposal minimizes the additional driveway hardcover required. D) The neighbors' request for the lakeshore setback and average setback variances to allow for the least disruptive sightlines, to maintain uniformity, and the capability to direct all drainage over 100' of relatively flat lawn area, justify the -anting of a variance to the lake--hc setback. E) The unique characteristics of the property i.e. the proposed building site separated from the rest of the property by a lagoon, constitute a valid hardship to the property. F) The variances can be granted without permanent crediting of lot area north of the lagoon. 4. The City Counci in reviewing this parcel finds that the property taken in its entirety, including area north of the lagoon, meets or exceeds the 1 acre lot area requirements for the LR-1B Zoning District. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 5 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 6. The City Council finds Mat the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other .pzoperty in this zoning district; that granting the variance would .._. ..._.110t adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8, to allow the construction of a new home located partially within the 0-75' lakeshore setback area where no structures are normally allowed, and grants a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow a total of 2,960 square feet of hardcover (or 1--.88) in the 0-75' setback zone at the building site where no hardcover is allowed, and to allow 3,380 square feet of hardcover (or 30%) in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone at the building site, where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed, and grants a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 1, to allow encroachment on the average lakeshore setback from the lagoon (or north) side of the building site, subject to the following conditions: 1. All drainage from the proposed house mlist be directed toward the lagoon to gain the maximum possible infiltration time and distance. 2. A site grading plan must be submitted for staff approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. Applicant is placed on notice that future additions of hardcover at the building site will not automatically be approved and would likely be subject to removal of equivalent amounts of existing hardcover. 4. Lowest floor elevation must be 932.5 MSL or higher. 5. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within o..e year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 26, 1985). 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the ter—, and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate anyauthority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanc-. Page 3 of 5 0 City of OR ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. .af The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 26 th day of August, 1985. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk (1) Property Owner (2) Property Owner Mary C. Butler, Mayor Spouse Spouse 11,1(1e 4 (.)f 'i vI City of OR ONO STATE OF' MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. On this _ __ day of _ _ 1 9 8 5 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known; to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that hc. (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATI' OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this _ day of _ , 1985, before me a rotary Public within and for said County, personally appeared _ ___ known to me to be the petson(sj descri_bed _ _ in and who executed the foregoinyinstrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 5 of 5 To: Orono Council Members From: Michael. P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator Date: August 21, 1985 Subject: #i942 Arthur Finkelstein, 1740 Shadywood Road - Variance - Revised Resolution Attached is a re -draft of Resolution No. 1813 reflecting the additional hardcover items to be removed per your direction of 8/12/85. A copy of this resolution has been mailed to the Finkelsteins. Assume that the Finkelsteins have accepted this resolution unless I pull it off the consent agenda Monday night. W041A MEETING Cf t V OF ORONO City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1813 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 FILE #942 WHEREAS, Arthur & Dorothy Finkelstein (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 1740 Shadywood Read within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 14 and 15, Shadywood, Hennepin County, Minnesota (here- inafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the construction of a garage addition which will increase hardcover in the 75-250' setback zone, where the existing hard- cover percentage exceed the 25% allowable limit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #942. 2. The property is located in the LR-lC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 15, 1985, and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: A) The applicants propose to concurrently remove por- tions of existing gravel parking area so thct there will be no net increase in hardcover on the property. B) Since the applicants purchased the property in June 1984, they have removed portions of pre-existing plastic lined rock bed hardcover on the property, and they have stated their intent to remove additional such plastic lined rock beds located in the 0-75' setback zone. Page 1 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. C) The existing boathouse on the property is considered a non -conforming structure and subject to the pertinent ordinances. 4. The applicant has removed certain hardcover items since the variance application commenced, reducing from 2347 square feet of hardcover (25.6%) in the 0-75' setback zone to approximately 2100 square feet or 23.0% hardcover, and reducing from 4640 square feet in the 75-250' sethlack zone (41.8%) to approximately 4619 square feet (41.6%). Other hardcover items are available for removal. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighLvring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to pre- serve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the construction of a garage addition with concurrent removal of existing hardcover resulting in a net decrease of hardcover on the property, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant has removed certain hardcover items in the amount of approximately 247 square feet in the 0-75' setback zone and 21 square feet in the 75-250' setback zone. Appli- cant shall remove an additional area of hardcover directly behind the existing garage, which constitutes a removal of approximately 40 square feet in the 75-250' zone and appro- ximately 122 square feet in the 0-75' zone. In addition, applicant shall remove the portions of sidewalk between the house and the new garage, constituting approximately 50 square feet in the 75-250' zone. Page 2 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1 continued. The net resulting hardcover then is 4529 square feet (40.8%) in the 75-250' zone and 1978 square feet (21.6%) in the 0-75' zone. Applicant is placed on notice that the hardcover may never exceed these resulting, amounts, and that any future proposals for additional hardcover may not be approved and might be approved only with concurrent removals of existing hardcover. 2. Council additionally grants approval for applicant to construct a driveway backup apron not to exceed 300 square feet, which addition of hardcover shall be concurrent with the removal of an equivalent area of hardcover on the property at such time the apron is constructed. 3. The applicant is placed on notice that the existing boathouse structure in the 0-75' zone is considered a non- conforming structure and is subject to the pertinent ordinances. 4. Authozities granter3 by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 26, 1986). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoninq code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and here- by agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 26th day of August, 1985. ATTr. T : Dorothy M. flaliin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor ( l) Propc:=t t y own(- r Page 3 of 4 City of OR ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ] 1 3 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 1985 before me a Notary Public within an_d for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 1985, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (trey) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 4 of 4 City of OR ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A U c „ A RESOLUTION DENYING pi _ AN AFTER -THE -FACT VARIANCE TO CI f f OF ORONO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 15 (C) AS AMENDED JANUARY 28, 1985 FILE i944 WHEREAS, James H. Lear (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 3127 Casco Circle within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 2, Block 1, Colorado Springs (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for an after -the -fact variance to Municipal Loning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (C) as amended January 28, 1985 to permit a six foot high privacy fence that runs parallel with the rear/street lot line for a distance of forty feet located approximately two feet off the right of way of Casco Circle where only a three and a half foot high fence is allowed; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Orono (hereinafter "Council") has reviewed the findings of the Planning Commission and the City staff and the written and oral comments of the applicant. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby denies the after -the -fact variance appli- cation of James H. Lear based on one or more of the following findings: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #944. 2. The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The applicant claims that the 6 font high privacy fence is needed to deter children from running into the street "after a pet, a ball or while playing a game". In con- sideration of the sloping topography within the rear yard of the property, a 3 1/2 foot high fence would serve as a deterrent.. Page 1 of 3 City of OR ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. t 4. The applicant claims a 6 foot high privacy fence is needed to block the view of the "unkept" park across the street from his property. The Casco Circle Park was deeded to the City of Orono with specific direction that the park be maintained in a natural state. The park exists today as it did when the applicant purchased the property. 5. The applicant claims the fence provides to protection for his home and surrounding improvements from vandalism. A forty foot length fence along the street lot line does not offer protection for a residence but may, in fact, serve to hide vandals from the view of adjacent neighbors and the police. 6. A forty foot length fence does not provide security. The fence is an integral part of the landscaping plan and ornamental in function and use. 7. The applicant has been advised that he may trim 2 1/2 feet off the height of the existing fence and maintain a legal 3 1/2 foot high fence, two feet off the road right-of- way but has refused to comply. 8. The applicant has been advised that he may move the rence 30 feet from the street/rear lot line and maintain the fence at the six foot height but he has refused to comply. 9. Per Section 10.07, Subdivision 6 of the Municipai Zoning Code. "It is unlawful for any person to hereafter erect or structurally alter a structure until a building permit shall have been issued indicating that the existing or proposed structure and the use of the land comply with this Zoning Chapter." The applicant's contractor failed to obtain the required building permit and as a result was never advised of the zoning standards for fence construction. 10. The plight of ti)E applicant is due to circumstances created by the applicant or agents of applicant. 11. If variances are granted to permit a new fence 6 feet in height, two feet off the road right-of-way, such action would establish a negative precedent in the review of similar applications. Page 2 of 3 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. FURTHERMORE, HE IT RESOLVED that the Council hereby denies the after -the -fact variance application of Jame H. Lear as proposed subject to the condition that the applicant must remove or make the necessary alterations to the existing privacy fence in order to bring the structure into compliance with the zoing code by September 30, 1985. Violation of or non-compliance with this condition of denial shall constitute a violation of the zoning code and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Adopted by the Orono City Counci 1 on this 26th day of August, 1985. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Page 3 of 3 To: Orono Council Members From: Michael P. Gaffror,, Assistant Zoning Administrator Date: August 21, 1985 Subject: #949 Gerald Anderson, 4495 North Shore Drive - Variance - Resolution Zoning District - LR-lB ```''tt9� 4�s� t����^ Application - Average Lakeshore Setback Vari''d u List of Exhibits A,U G 2 G 1.) Exhibit A - Application ��1 �� ®�r-U��o Exhibit B - Plat Map y Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Hardcover Calculations The applicant is proposing an attached garage, living room, great room and deck addition to his home. The great room will extend into the average lakeshore setback area, while still maintaining a lake setback of nearly 1801. The house encroachment into the average setback is 9'. The deck will extend into the average deck setback a distance of 191. Applicant has stated his neighbors have been shown copies of the plans and have no objections to the proposal. Neither neighbor appeared at the public hearing. Proposed hardcover in the 75-250' zone has been calculated by staff as 24.4%, including the I -,3sed deck. In the 250-500' zone, staff has calculated approximat • 550 square feet of existing and proposed structural hardcover in(-_ jing sidewalks, old garage, and new garage addition where a total of 1650 square feet hardcover would be allowed, hence 1100 square feet of driveway can be added and still be within the limitations. This would allow for an 18'x50' driveway plus 121x15' backup apron. Based on these observations, the applicant can meet City hardcover requirements without %ariances. Applicant plans to re -side the existing garage near the road to match the house additions. Staff would recommend approval of the average setback variances per the attached resolution. i.� . CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional project) �f After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION �r II Site Address yyflS 00A skarF- Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) It 0741 J-o?.3-3/-o0oS Please check one -- Is the pro abstract or torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name %uA- t/74U s- Phone _ Mailina Address dg/y WAIL 6 OR__�d��s-���n„� ------------ -------------------------------------------------------------- OWNER �t Name Jerry A NOV(Srr1, Phone 4 7a S 3 4 Mailing Address 4 4 A-'e 7._+4 A: Date Property Acquired 111A X I ?,C; (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property esidential Other (specify) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ OY% 00v Describe request in detail: g UAQ/��►� ----------- --------------------------------------------------------------- VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances ( Front Side Rear) Other --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ( OV E: R ) HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603Government Center 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (# 10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applic=nt hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay allfeesand/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of hiker knowledge. Applicant's signature Date • OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Counc members for purposes of investigation and verification of is request. �I/ Owner's signature �l( Date 7- t' -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. S ME SEC. 7 , T. //7, R. 23 L `so � fl d�. •..•or,., �32 ,,, 31) 4 2 ctn Ob ' +'o Q1•• '`w•:�.�'rey ,7 t j � ., i dry or •. ►,,+_� *cqR ., .GCS FOREST LAKE t • r + i :,�� I1 �{y • O� ♦ t1 . •a cr .. (N01 wCANDI"RED ) 4::: .* .� M «•. q l 3 /,•tin•. U-L 4 r �•''O ,,` y •• a ;• �•• • QQi) � IfY•'� + ♦ +✓"l� •'j• ' rry � Ip . � _ f �•,� � •• . .,�a1N11�"'�-� � '•!v ' ;�•�!s V .:1� ., .: -� / •�r�� 1M�,��•J•n I� r». . ` >3�' I a .' ._. ROAD•«. Nog '� � �te) r•. P.• (,.; • � ( • ail. t '' • , ti • < r, 7.q• ♦ � � �I .1 � •,�f �� �.� '- ..r.rr.... r tr/.'• 7 � M!n,, rl. r• ' • •L. �•rI` r►"Ar . � � �' � a � � ' t r� wro•« •! � 1 4+b� ,t • ' 1. ,tt•ta�vQM ,G�11p[�S �I �E •. � .. � • , r • t,. `{ � l• • � �„ r �4'� � r•: 1 � �- . • wYr v ,��a- lest.. • tg� 4 •' f``' � +' �S� , ,yM • r n : ♦ f .1 : • • �) ,Oi •- ` r �.'eL' yr" 1 • r'al w•n.r�...•-.•..r..• • ,j� �1 ♦c r � • i • � � 1 ►jT.b• r s - i 15• • �I •• root r•••,.... ••w•... ..,w.. rl l} 'f�'• A \ • , d , • (y� t ••� • u. t h O r y l�� .�A•, • .•e �l►,y 1 • l.�', i• 0 Ia a • . '� r.��{•IFt•1, •I°� ' �tr :. �• +. t,..',Q., � � pal • s . — • 4`Z pair � p) • • • t ♦ b� d ,!'1 •/ 'WEST A � NN�c-l. O/I�/� a"41. 6�.nw`iuq SEC 18,T 117.R2_' 43 33 3a �3 Mr. & Mrs. J.L. Theisen Jr. Mr. & Mrs. Vigants 4465 North Shore Drive 4496 North Shore Drive Mound, MN 55364 Mound, MN 55364 Mr. & Mrs. H.J. Rigelhof Mr. & Mrs. Peterson 4515 North Shore Drive 4485 North Shore Drive Mound, MN 55364 Mound, MN 55364 Mr. & Mrs. J.T. Bessesen 4500 North Shore Drive Mound, MN 55364 Ccrtilicate of survey for Gerald L. Anderson of Lot 7, "Bergquist's Addition to Saga (till 0"1 Hennepin Co. Minn." 9767 / p IL?P"0 rJC� 9 hna aaSfnlC�J 0 / wDEx � J� � 1 0 35 {ae� sC{� `c i hereby certify that this is a true o , and correct representation of a survey v Exsfn of the boundaries of Lot 7, "Berg- ha i quist's Addition to Saga Hill, Hen- nepin Co. Minn." and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon. it does not purport to show any other inprovements or encroachments, other E i than the hardcover surfaces on said lot. w co" & GRONBERG, IaC. Av(P,DECK Mark S. Gronberg Reg, o. 12755 $ Gordon R. Coffin Reg, No. 6064 N Engineers and Land Surveyors Long take, Minnesota Phone 473-4141 . A Co �h�rel.0 W •n MorS1, ►Id5N��clr � ,. ory rV Scale: 1 inch = 40 feet rate March 29, 19851 Revised on o Iron marker August 9, 1985 to show existing houses on Lots 6 and 8. HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS BY STAFF 4495 NORTH SHORE DRIVE Area 75-250' = 12,600 s.f. Hardcover, existing & proposed: House 1,130 s.f. Attached Garage 500 s.f. L.R. 90 s.f. Front Walk 100 s.f. Great Room 650 s.f. Deck 600 s.f. 3,070 s.f. 3070/12,600 = 24.4% Area 250-500' = 5,500 s.f. (south of right-of-way line) Hardcover, existing & proposed: Attached Garage 120 s.f. Old Garage 280 s.f. Old & New Sidewalk 150 s.f. 550 s.f. 1650 - 550 = 1100 s.f. available for driveway; 18'x50' driveway = 900 s.f. 15'xl2' backup apron = 180 s.f. It is feasible to add driveway and backup apron and still keep within hardcover limits. LAKESHORE SETBACK ZONE 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' Directions: A. Existing lot area in zone 4800 sf 12600 sf 9500 sf sf ORONO HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSIiEET (81 A"&1C-4"T, B. Existing hardcover in zone 1148 C. Existing hardcover percentage f (B;A) x 100) D. Proposed hardcover in zone E. Proposed hardcover percentage HD -'A) x 1001 F. Allowed hardcover percentage sf 0 % 0 sf 0 % 0 "/e sf 9.1 1985 sf 15.7 51,10 286 sf 3.0 Y. sf 9 n 25 '/o 1750 sf 18.4 90 30 `,. sf e/ 3 5 '% 0 A. Existing Lot Area in Zone - includes the total square footage of dry buildable land within the specified zone. B. Existing Hardcover in Zone - includes the square footage of existing roofs, decks, sidewalks, driveways (gravel or paved) and other rain -impervious surfaces within the specified zone. C. Existing Hardcover Percentage - divide the number in B by the number in A and multiply by 100. D. Proposed Hardcover in Zone - includes the existing hardcover plus all proposed additional hardcover. E. Proposed Hardcover Percentages - divide the number in D by the number -in A and multiply by 100. F. Allowed Hardcover Percentages - if the percentages in column E for any setback zone exceed the ailowed percentages in column F, you should contact the Zoning Department at 473-7357 to discuss the possibilities of obtaining a variance. Generally, if a concurrent removal of existing hardcover matches the additional hardcover proposed, resulting in no net increase of hardcover in a specified zone, a variance may not be necessary. #:�49 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 (B) PILE #949 WHEREAS, Gerald Anderson (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 4495 North Shore Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally des- cribed as follows: Lot 7 "Bergquist's Addition to Saga Hill, Hennepin County, Minnesota" (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Muni-ipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to permit the construction of a room addition and deck which encroach into the average lakeshore setback area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #949. 2. The property is located in the LR-lB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on August 19, 1985, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: A) The house addition will encroach 9' into the average house setback area; the deck will encroach 19' into the average deck setback area. B) Applicant has shown his proposal to the neighboring property owners who have voiced no objection to the proposal. C) The proposal does not require any other variances and meets the hardcover requirements of the City. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 1 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5. The City Council finds that cne conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hards`;ip or difficulty; is necessary to pre- serve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipai Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to permit the construction of a room addition which encroaches 9' into the average house setback area and a deck which encroaches 19' into the average deck setback area subject to the following conditions: 1. The total improvement of this property is limited to 3,150 square feet of hardcover in the 75-250' setback zone and 1,650 square feet of hardcover in the 250-500' zone. Existing hardcover as a result of the current proposal will be very close to these limits, ana applicant is advised that future additions of hardcover are subject to City review and will not be approved unless they are counter balanced with the concurrent removal of existing hardcover. 2. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 26, 1986). 3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shell automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 2 of City of OR ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and here- by agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 26th day of August, 1985. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor (1) Property Owner I'.-it7E- 3 , � f 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 1985 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, per finally appeared known to r z) be the person(s) described in and who executed the fc joing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES vTATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF 11 NNEPIN ) On this day of , 1985, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoina instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free acL and deed. `.RY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 4 of 4 To: Mayor Butler, Orono Council Members From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City AdministratoI'Plat AU G 2s 1985 Date: August 21, 1985 1 CITY W a Subject: Change Order M2 Due to significant poor soil problems that we were having during the construction, particularly along Briar we needed to make a change order for rock for the s* -ts in order to makc them passable for the residents. Because of the ng, I discussed the matter with the two of the three Council members ..iiv were in town the week of August 12th. The initial estimate and change order if for $4,000, it is hoped, based on soil condi- tions, to be only about $2,500. It is recommended that the Council formally approve this Change Order. Any further questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. To: Mayor Butler, Orono Council Members From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administratoz Date: August 23, 1985 Subject: County Road 15 Variance Approval As you may be aware, the variance board for Minnesota Department of Transporation approved County Road 15 as designed and submitted by Hennepin County. At present it is our under- standing that the project is programmed for construction to be commenced in 1989. Now that the variance has been approved, it is perhaps prudent for each of the Communities to get together and address a letter to the County to see if the construction date can be moved up, for a more timely construction period. It is recommended that the Council direct the Administrator to develop a letter which will be a joint letter on behalf of Orono and the other Communities involved, to request the County to move up the date that it has presently has programmed for County Road 15. Should you have any further questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. A,'J G 2 g ', CITY of UhUML To: Mayor Butler, t Orono Council Members �IhG From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator r A U G Date: August 21, 1985 Subject: North Shore Drive OF 0kV1�N V Long -Term Public Access Commitment BACKGROUND At the City Council meeting of May 13th, 1985, the residents along North Shore Drive, between the North Arm Bridge and Tonkawa, presented a petition requesting that no parking signs be posted along County Road 51. This is a follow-up to a petition and request in 1982 to prohibit parking of boat trailer vehicles. In July, the City received a letter from the LMCD requesting that the communities work towards getting long-term commit- ments for the parking spots that were designated in Lake Minnetonka Task Force' recommendations. While the LMCD regulations do call for all spots to be within 1500 feet, which would be about the mid -way point between Tonkawa and Baldur Park, they may at least on interim bases be nterested in spots beyond that 1500 feet. ISSUES A. Whether Orono wants to promote the 5-year offsite parking commit- ment requested by the LMCD. This will be in light of the City's previous s*and regarding securing long-term parking, together with a desire to commit spots long-term for public access, in an effort to forestall pressure for other public accesses in Orono. B. If the commitment is made for those slots, whether the appropriate parties are interested in taking other actions to help alleviate the problem. DISCUSSION Since the petition was received by the City, the City and particular the Police Department have been working with the neighbors, particularly Dan Regan, 3410 North Shore Drive. During some of the week -ends in June, reserve officers were in the area together with patrol officers noting .onditions during Saturdays and Sundays. Additionally we requested that incidents of a non -emergency nature be recorded together with license plates of offending parties regarding trespassing. If there are ser=.ous concerns we requested that 911 be used. We had a smattering of each c:f these, but nothing identify an overarching need for elimina*icn of parking. Of the problems we initially identified as being significant, tres- passing on private docks together with the attended liability for the private owners and the "crimes of opportunity" that are occurinq because of that seemed most significantly. Additionally there was some disturbance of the peace, particularly of boaters returning after partying on th:.- lake. North Shore Drive August 21, 1985 Page 2 It is felt that these can be addressed in other manners short of posting no -parking. As far as pedestrian bike safety along the way, the potential for problems does exist. Prohibitting parking may not necessarily remedy those and to the extent that the cars parked along North Shore Drive tend to "narrow" North Shore Drive may tend to slow the driver and may actually improve the situation. The concern of the neighbors in part is that they have seen the problem increase over the last 3 to 5 years in part due to closings or limitations of other accesses on the lake together with an expected in- crease in boating in future years. This is in part based on an expected increase in use by off -lake residence as areas such as Orono's rural area develop. This may also be aggrevated if a significant number of non- residence boat owners who currently dock at private docks along the lake are no longer able to utilize those docks and begin to utilize public accesses on a regular basis. If it hoped that the DNR's attempts to secure the public accesses either on the west or south side will alleviate part of this problem. RECOMMENDATION A. That the Council encourage the appropriate parties to take the following remedial action to address this specific problems. 1. Encourage construction of low decorative fences of the ease- ment, not to exceed 3 112 feet to be constructed by the appro- priate private residents and help provide property definition and limit trespassing, and insure appropriate signage is posted - both on the road side of tr.- properties and the lake side of the docks. 2. The City work with the County to attempt the following: - utilization of asphalt curbing to prevent parking off the asphalt damaging the people's grass - stripping be to allow for pedestrian bike path on lakeside of County Road 51 - the designated gap (6 to 10 feet) every 150 to 2n0 feet to improve pedistrian safety crossing - if needed, appropriate signage be put up to direct persons back to the public a.-cess 3. That the residents aid the City work together to monitor the situation and develop means and information by which the owners can work with the police to limit law violations as relates to their property. North Shore Drive August 21, 1985 Page 3 While the City has looked at the possiblity of putting a make ready dock off its fire access to reduce trespassing on the docks, the residents at this time do not feel that it is necessary and we are not recommending that this be done at this time. If the other measures do not elimiate the problems identified, however, this may be an option to explore. B. That the City adopt a resolution that the County make a 5-year commitment with the LMCD for all the spots along North Shore Drive. Both this resolution and the agreement should include that this commitment can be terminated if specific public safety problems arise necessitating that the parking be reduced or eliminated. It is addi- tional recommended that the spots beyond 1500 feet on North Shore Drive continue to have parking as they may provide parking for people using the public access in the early and late winter. Kathleen Wallace, the regional coordinator for DNR, will be present should you have any questions regarding access on west and south sides of the lake. Should you have further questions or commants, please feel free to contact me. PHONE NO STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 296-3572 July 25, 1985 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106 Mr. Mark Bernhardson City Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Bernhardson: 1. Qv Q�QNO c�� v As agency heads for the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Metropoli- tan Council (MC), and the Department of Energy and Economic Development (DEED), we are writing you to urge your community to support and to initiate implementing the goals and recommendations of the Lake Minnetonka Task Force Report and to offer our agencies' assistance in this effort. Metro Water Access Task Force In 1979, our three agencies, at thy• recommendation of the Legislative Commission on Minnesota's Resources, ..:tided together to form a task force for the purpose of developing a c­�perative program for providing in- creased public access to metropolitan area lakes. The task force defined the term "adequate public access" and ranked the metropolitan area lakes according to their need for additional. or improved access. Based on this criteria, Lake Minnetonka was listed as one of the highest priority lakes for establishing new or improving existing public access. Creation of the Lake Minnetonka Task Force With this in mind, the DNR, in 1981, identified a parcel of property on Halstpd's Bay suitable for public access and with a willing seller. By February, 1982, local opposition to DNR's plans to acquire the site prompted Governor Quie to direct the DNR to abandon their plans. The ensuing dialogue between the Governor's Office, the legislature, the DNR, and Lake Minnetonka area residents resulted in the creation of the Lake Minnetonka Task Force (I.MTF); which was charged with studying the recre- ational uses of the lake and preparing a report on their findings. The task force was comprised of ten citizen members, nine government offi- cials, and a chairperson, Bob Searles, former legislator from the Minnetonka area. Both Minnetonka area and non -Minnetonka area commu- nit es were represented as well as one representative each for boating, ,;ailing, and fishing interegrs. The input of all communities on Lake Minnetonka was sought. Additionally, public meetings where held to solicit input from individuals and groups. The task force found that there is a need and a demand for additional access to lake Minnetonka. There is, however, no desonstrated need for additional lake access, f(ir AN EOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER .401po'..6. boats other than fishing craft and small recreational boats. The Report of the Lake Minnetonka Task Force, Juwtc 1983, details the workings, findings, goals, and recommendations of this task force. Lake Minnetonka Conservation Districts Role The Lake Minnetonka Task Force noted that the Lake Minnetonka Conserva- tion District (LMCD) "... should continue to be the primary agency in coordinating the study, monitoring, and regulating of recreational use patterns ...." The task force also recommended that the LMCD "... be responsible to coordinate existing standards for what constitutes reli- able parking in the vicinity of access sites and to maintain a program designed to reach and sustain the task force goal of 700 (vehicle -trailer parking) spaces." Recently, in response to this recommendation, the LMCD adopted reliable parking standards. We encourage your community to use these standards and work with the LMCD to reach the reliable parking goal. Request for Support Once again, we urge your community to consider and take actions which implement the recommendations of the task force. The task force rec- ommendations specific to your community and the zones within your community are addressed on an attached sheet. Separate letters from each of our agencies which clarify our roles, responsibilities, and types of assistance that we can offer your community to help reach the task force's goals will be sent to you shortly. 1+e are looking forward to working with you. Sincerely, Jos ph N. Alexander, Commi-s' finer Department of Natural Resources Sandra Gardebring, Chair Metro olitan Council rk B. Dayton, Commis. oner Department of Fnergy and Ecorior,,ic i?evelopr:ent cwPS c c : LMCD 1.MTF Members Legislators Hennepin and Carver County Boards ,attachment .SUMMARY OF THE LAKE MINNETONKA TASK FORCE"', RECOKMENDATIONS FOR PUBLIC ACCESS Community: OR.ONO Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Contact Person: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Phone: (612) 473-7357 Zones: 1, 2, 3 Zones* Task Force Recommendations Recommendation: North Arm/Hendrickson Access - Add make-ready dock; add signs showing the location of off -site parking; and provide toilets, trash containers, public phones, and adequate landscaping. In addition, any or all of the following methods should be employed to reach the Task Force goal of 700 total car -trailer public parking spaces for the lake: Increase on -site parking by land acquisition where land availability and funding permits; increase reliable parking by acquisition of or through written parking agreements for off-street parking lots in the vicinity; increase long-term reliable on -street parking in the vicinity through written parking agreements. 1, 2 Recommendation: If long-term written parking agreements for existing sites within these zones cannot be secured, then additional access for small boats with associated parking should he considered to meet reliable parking goals for the zones. 1 Recommendation --Shore Facilities: Noerenberg Bridge - Improve landscaping. Benches, trash containers, and toilets should he provided. 2 Recommendation --Shore Facilities: Molly's Corner/Browns Bay - Secure parking and construct a fishing pier on Brown's Br-. Benches, trash containers, and toilets should be provided. 3 Recommendation: Additional fishing craft and small recreation boat access should be sought. 1, 3 Recommendatior: Acquisition of Deering Island and the Big Island Veterans Camp for park purposes. The State should obtain full and clear title to th_e Camp and the HCFRi1 should develop and manage the site in conjunction with the Arthur Allen Wildlife Sanctuary as a regional park. *To address the distribution of accesses for fishing craft and small recrea- tion boats, the Task Force arrived at a system wherebv the lake was divided into five major zone,. See attached map. 1,2,3 Recommendation: When County Road 15 between Wayzata and Navarre needs improvement, it should be designed and managed as a two-lane scenic parkway preserving the historical vistas of this unique lakeshore roadway. Improvements should provide, where environmentally possible, bike and hiking trails and scenic parking areas. County and State standards should be modified to allow the roadway to be classified as a scenic parkway. 1,2,3 Recommendation: If your community has a trail plan, the task force recommends that the plan be implemented to improve shore access. 1. 3 Recommendation: Implementing agencies and Orono should cooperate in monitoring any future land use changes at existing commercial access sites and should consider public access use prior to any rezoning for non -access use. 1,2.3 kfcommendation: When managing access sites and when considering new lakeshore development, particular attention should be given to the goal of improving access for fishing craft and small recreation boats. To: Mayor Butler, Orono Council Members From: Mark E. Bernhardso: City Administratoz-L_) Date: August 21, 1985 Subject: Big Island Subsequent to our last meeting I spoke with Jeff Olson, the Assistant Commissioner for Veterans Affairs of the State and he indicated that he and a representative from the Big Island Board of Governors were attempting to set up a meeting to jointly develop a plan regarding the property. As of August 20th, 1985 however, a date had not been established. It was addi- tional indicated to me by an interested party living on Big Island that the Board o' Governors hav_hired the architectural firm of Setter, Leach and Lindstrom 10 do an evaluation of the buildings in order to develop a reasonable plan regarding rehabilitation of the property. This person is to get back to me with an estimated report date from the architect. Based on a r-asonable date, it is our recommendation that we delay for another two we As until September 9th for the passage of the resolutions regarding hazardous building proceedings. Should you have further questions er comments, please feel ree to contact me. Ap CGUN0L MEETING To: Mayor Butler, Orono Council. Members �j AU G 2 R 1935 From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat* CITY OF ORONO Date: August 23, 1985 Subject: Sewer Assessment Policy - Navarre INTRODUCTION In 1981 the City was experiencing problems with Lift S+-ation #6's (Casco Point Road) capacity during a heavy rain or power failure at Lift Station #7 near Shadywood (which drained back to #6). With the Schlee development in 1982 it was decided in order to rectify the existing problem at peak times, that a by --pass line was constructed and assessed at $150/unit for all existing properties and undeveloped properties with stubs together with additional assessments against the Schlee development, etc. This substantially paid for the cost (90% of $221,365.00) In 1984, in conjunction with Fresh Water Biological Institute's (FWBI) subdivision plan, an additional project to re -do the force main at Lift Station #7 was undertaken. The project cost was a total of $116,000 of which FWBI was to pay $47,080 based on an existing $2000/acre formula for trunk availability. Then at the time of connection $500/unit for 12 units for the Lift Station #7 improvement plus the initial $225/connection unit charge in Navarre for all new units from the original sewer plus $150/unit for the by-pass line for a total of $875/unit for each of 12 units was to be p,: id by FWBI. The capacity added by the by-pass and Lift Station #7 forcemain was at least 192 units. It was estimated that in addition to FWBI's 12 uni+ :hat an 116 new unstubbed residential units could be coming on line the future. It was decided that in order to assure the Cit• 'as repaio, and recouped the cost of money until the units connection ct.arges were paid, that the balance $57,120 of the actual assessment estimate ($104,200) less FWBI's $47,080, be divided by 58 (1/2 of the 1:6) new residential units (to the extent that more come on line it would cover holding costs, etc.). The policy as adopted (see attached) stated thz!t all new structures or modifications in existing use resulting in more sewage be charged $1,345/unit broken down as follows: $220 - Initial connection charge (from 1963) 150 - By-pass (82-1) 985 - Lift Station #7 connection (1984) $1,345 - Total The initial system charge has probably been paid off and such monies will eventually go to the sewer operating fund. .11 but $22,932 of the by- pass was assessed with various pay backs. As for the Lift Station #7 charge, 58 units will pay off the principal. Sewer Assessment Policy - Navarre August 23, 1985 Pacjo .' This policy issue was raised by a plan to place a laundromat in an existing commercial structure. Given thut this use results in 19 units •-.f capacity used, that they would be face? with a S25,555 connection cnarge. Coup o ing this with a request for a car wash :r the area w ich would be faced with a $13,450; the twc properties if the projects went ahead would pay $ °,005 dollar.; of which $29,000 would go to Lift Station 07. This amount to 50% of the assessment being paid 1)y these two. Because of the charges however, it is doubtful either improvement will happen. ISSUES A. Should exist;Lag commercial buildings which have already 'OFF -,sessed the actual chaige plus by-pass charge be faced with an , hire r Lift Station #7 plus the other two charges for ­n(_rea­--,d us Is it best to review and adop* comnreher".ve policy for all improve- ments as suggested by the attached u;,,mo from Flan Olson. C. H%,w iF Orono to recoup its mon( ,�, •: * _ :a n connections. DISCUSSION ;.he projects from future, somewhat The concern at. the .ime c' ^he present , cy was being ueveloped was: a) Will connection ch >f f the principal "assigned" to .t.-!m i.e. will those cc- en? b) Since no timing estimated, now will the City be reimbursed fnr its The situa'-ion we arc presently faced with is that: a) Because of the cha--es, certain improvement projects to existing bui ldings wi i 1 probat i y no, happen and therefore the City col lects noth ;. rig. Shoe d the ' ota i capacity be charged at the present rate and a l l units hooked up, the City could conceivably collect $1.83,000 to p- $67,000 in principal (intereat in f.fteen years estimati, was paid in that time would be about $50,000 if nook upc wer ds, ".?nly over the 5 years). c) That persons who hooked up and paid in 1984 would pay the szme dollar charge ap one who hooks ulp in 199P •ith n.) ad justi,gent for inf lai.i on : time cost of money. Sewer Ar.sessment Policy - Navarre August 23, 1�95 Page 3 d) That had these existing buildings done the projects in 1983 or earlier they would probably not have paid these charges since they already had been assessed the $225 and °' 7,0 at that time they happened and not paid the $985. e) Had no new development come in, some system correction would have to be done and either paid for out of sewer utility charges or assessed against existing property owners. f) At present about 10-15% of the future connection charges r Lift Station #7 have been paid. RECONREMATI•;: At present, there are zz least four different s� t i r ••ssible in the district which are charged the same under the prey •)o - Existing buildings/new use increasing sewage - New buildings replacing existing buildings ^w residential with stubs w residential without stubs For the p stnt is. a regarding these specific charges, the following .ems are recom.;ended as an amended policy in Lift Station #6, #7, #8, 113 and #22 Prea: a) That all new residential lots developed that currently do not have a stub be cha_.-ed the entire $1,345 plus $113.50 (10% of the Lift Station #71s $�,35 and $1 `"0 for the by-pass) fo. each year after 1984 that they hook up to pay for the City's "carrvi n,r costs". b) That new residential uw,- is with stubs c, charged $985 -lus $98.50 per year. c) That new bu 'ings replacing existing ones with n:) inc.--ease in usage not be ;ed . d) That existing buildings with increaF d usage he c -d 5335 per increase unit plus $33.50 per year after 1984. If th .sting capa- city were used up strictly by existing commercial `:ic Duld pay off the assessments. e) To the extent that f.,tu.-e units do not come on line, it is recom- mended that the monie. tc t-cen f- maintenance funds, as *he project would nave most probably have ' e done, and so paid. (This project was not bondf-d but borrowed funds from the PIR fund.) Should you adopt these rccommendat ions `hey will he brought back in iesolution form on F-�ptember 9th, 1985. i for rather r-commended ac•ti,_ns: a, That a comprehensive impr ,vement E..)licy be deveiped and adopted to 911ide fut.ire assessmen . poli_ies. Sewer Assessment Policy - Navarre August 23, 1985 Page 4 b) The FWBI be formally assessed the $47,050 that it was allocated to them from Lift Station V. If these recommendations are agreed to they will be addressed later this fall. Should you have further questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. City Of ORONO RESOLUTIOM OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1620 A RESOLUTION CONCERNING CHARGES FOR THE USE OF SEWER SYSTEMS IN AREAS SEWERED BY LIFT STATIONS 16, 17, t8, 113 6 i22 BE IT RESOLVED that for the purpose of paying for the construction of the forcemain by-pass, and enlargement and improve- ment of the sewer system, in order to provide capacity for future development in Lift St, '.ions 116, 117, 18, #13, and #22 areas, the City Council shall impose, as a just and equitable charge for the use and for the availability of such facilities and for connection therewith, the amount of $1,345 per unit to be paid upon issuance of a building permit for a new structure or upon modification of an existing use which use will or does result in an increase discharge of sewage. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held April 9, 1984. Attest:���� Alberta M. Strom, City Clark FIGURE II - Summary of current and potential flows to LS-6, LS-7, and L-8 under current zoning standards. Current Additional Total Current Max. potential Potential Zoning Residential Potential* and Potential Res. Units for Units without L.Sta. No.: Districts: Units: Res. Units: Res. Units: Lift Station: Service Stub LS-8 LR-lB 47 + 7 54 54 5 (flows intj LS-7) IS-7 LR-lB, 117 + 62 179 �)33 34 (flows into B-4 (plus 54 LS-6) from LS-8) LS-6 LR-lB, (Res. only) (includes flow LR-IC, 250 + 73 323 52 from LS-22 and LR-IC-1 LS-13) B-1, B-3, Wormn'1) 6!1 B-4, B-5 5 + 50 = 115 30 (plus 233 from LS-7) TOTALS 479 + 192 671 116 x* * A Residential Unit equivalent for commercial property unit calculation is 274 gallons/day. Units were calculated at 1500 gpd/acre for commercial property potentials. ** There are 116 potential units out of 192 potential units which do not presently have a sewer ser- vice stub from the sewer main to the property line. 0-4 8c TO: Walter R. Benson, City Administrator Tom Kuehn, Finance Director John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator Glenn R. Cook, City Engineer Bruce D. Malkerson, City Attorney FROM: Alan P. Olson DATE: September 29, 1983 SUBJECT: Collection of Sewer and Water "Unit" Charges and Assessment Policy Ea-h time a public improvement project is done, and each time late or deferred "units" are determined and collected with new dev4lopments, the question is again raised about fairness and adequate return on investment for the City. The 82-1 trunk sewer project forced the that includes "deferred" unit charges to permits, just like the old 63-1 "plant" from the beginning of the 82 project was would increase in dollar amount as years inflation and for the City's expense of paid for the total project including the Z recommend two actions: issue because of the formula be collected with future charge of $225. The intention that these deferred units go by to compensate for carrying the bond issue that deferred amount. 1. Consider and adopt an ordinance similar to that attached. This Expands and clarifies the existing "late connection" section of both water and sewer chapters of the code, and it sets up the graduated tables of increasing charges depending upon which year the connection is made. The deferred sewer units [25.854(f)] arc the units intended to be collected with each new building permit in the affected areas. A map has been prepared which shows these areas (see Dorothy Hallin). The availability units (sewer 25.854(g) and water 25A.214(f)) are units that should have been assessed throughout the area, but which might be added by either 1) extention of new laterals into undeveloped areas such as the Tonka property in Navarre or the hill by Saga Hill; or 2) new subdivision of Property previously assessed for fewer units than now approved; or 3) expansion of existing commercial, industrial or multi -family residential properties where the expanded use is for more units than originally assessed. The tables are art up with suggested dollar increases ye.ir by year. They should be reviewed by the Finance Department and adjusted as necessary before adoption. The whole thing might be best incorporated within the recodification instead of being adopted separately. If adopted separately, prepare a resolution and summary for publication also. 2. The second action should be adoption of an ASSESSMENT POLICY resolution. I suggest including the following points: a) Adopt as a guideline to be usec' in determining future project assessment formulas, but may be altered as project needs vary. b) In areas of new development, utility projects could be assessed as follows: trunk service: by area and unit lateral service: by front footage and/or uni- service stubs: include with lateral "unit" c) In areas of existing development, projects could be assessed as follows: trunk service: by area and uni lateral service: by unit only d) Street projects could be assessed by curb -frontage and by area in existing developments, and by unit only in new developments. e) Storm sewer projects should be assessed by area only in existing developments, and by either area or unit in new developments. f) Private developers in the rural area should install all improvements as private projects without City assessment. g) Private developers in the urban area should install new improvements as private projects without City assessment except when off -site improvements or off -site benefit is involved. h) For consistency, new sewer projects connecting anywhere to the old 63-1 project should inciide in their formula the $225 "plant charge" unit [or it's current dollar amount see proposed 25.854(f)) as a deferred unit charge on future building sites. i) Connections to new privately -installed sewer or water e:.tensions should still pay the City trunk sewer or water availability "unit" charges, but obviously no lateral unit charges. For information ana convenience, I have attached a complete table of all past public and private improvement projects and their assessment formulas. O iullo K tETIHG To: Mayor Butler, Orono Council Members � � AUG 2 G 1935 From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Date: August 21, 1985 CITY OF ORONO Subject: Coded Adoption by Ordinance In the past, Orono has on annual basis, by resolution, adopted its building code and since this building code incorporated such codes such as the plumbing and heating codes Orono did not have to adopt these separately. In researching another matter however, it was discovered that the current building code which was amended in 1985, no longer adopts these codes by reference and the City now has to so adopt in order to be able to enforce them on a local basis by ordinance. RSCOMMSNDATION It is recommended that the Council adopt by ordinance the following list of codes in order to be on appropriate legal ground for enforcement: Minnesota Plumbing Code - rhapter 4715 Minnesota Heating, Ventil:.,.~g, Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Rules - Chapter 1345 1984 National Electrical Code 1983 Model Energy Code as Amended Staff will draft an ordinance for formal approval at your meeting of the 26th. We are unable to include the complete ordin.nce until staff is in receipt of additional information from the State Bui�.ding Code Division. Should you have further questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. Memo #85-'1 COUNCii WETING TO: Mark Elernh,ardson, Cit f Ddminir :rator AUG 2G10 FROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director 5 DATA: August 12, 1985 G01'Y OF N NO SUBJBCT: Revenue Sharing R::imbursement for Budgeted Expenditures For the year 1995 the City has budgeted $52,000 from the Federal Revenue Sharing Fund to be used for General Fund and Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund support. Through July 31, 1985, we have expended $40,839.97 from both funds for revenue sharing purposes. It is recommended that $15,850.09 be transferred to the General Fund and that $8,888.45 be transferred to the Improvement and Equipment outlay Fund for the following 1985 expenditures. Rev Share Cost Portion General Fund - Police Department Camera, and lockers S 850.00 Squad cars, 3 complete less sale of 2 26,795.84 Radar units 2, barrier. vests 2 4,296.68 Total General Fund $31,942.52 $15,850.00 Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund Finance Department - 2 Calculators $ 341.95 Government Buildings Department - 4,004.58 telephone communization equipment, vanity, and drop box side entrar-:(, for hdministration tuilding Street Department - 4,541.92 Coupler for front-end loader, chain saw, band saw Total Improve 6 Equip Outlay Fund $ 8,888.45 $ 8,888.45 Total All Fund,, $49,830.97 $24,738.45 �caa��socc aaa aasoa� To: Mayor Butler and Orono Council Members 1 From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato4 C Forwardld recommending approval. The actual total avai'.able for 1985 is 43,300. This transfer leaves a balance of*18,561.55 which wil' '-,e transferred once the Nidgeted purchases are made. Iq To: Mayor Butler, Orono Council Members AU G 19$5 From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administr.to CITY OF OWN Date: August 21, 1985 Subject: Parade of Komes In the past M.�ek the staff has developed a recommendation for handling the parade of homes for this year on Bohn's Point. This plan will be discussed ith the Krutzigs and the neighbors at the meeting on Wednesday, August 28th, here at the City offices. in checking with the Minneapolis Builders Association, it was found that thL . --illowinry houses in Orono will also be in the Parade of Homes. French Creek Development ;2 homes) 1290 Lyman Avenue Salem Court Later this fall, after conclusion of the Parade of Homes, we will bring back recommendations regarding any proposed regulation of such re- lated events for 1986 based on our 1985 experience. Should you have fLrther questions or comments, feel free to contact me. To: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Fr(an: Joy- R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator Date: August 21, 1985 Subject: Refura '-ter Meter Freshwater Biological Institute In Decembei 1, the Freshwater Biological Institute, 2500 Shadywood Road, F chased 0 ee water meters from the City of Orono to be installed at that iocation to determine actual water used for sprinkling, air conditioning and initary facilities in the building. It has been determined that one meter will not be used, therefore, they are requesting a refund for that meter. The ineter they wish to return is the size and type '- t is ,::)rma.,-y in our inventory, therefore, it is my recommenda to refund the FWBI an amount not to exceed $12­*."0. To: Mayor Butler anc ion( Council. Members From: Mark E. Bern;'hards�.tn, City A&n inistratoii'',:k Forwarded Recommending Approval CJTW INTEROFFICE MEMO 85-121 coukt - h7lfTfq DATE: August 19, 1985 AUG 2 61935 TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator CITY OF ORONO FROM: Mel Kllbo, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Public Auction As a result of very pour attendance to the auction held on Saturday, August 17, 1985, I request permission to rehold a public auction according to Orono Ordinance 2-61 at 1285 South Brown Road in Orono on August 31, 1985 at 10:00 a.m. T'1te intent of the auction will be to sell 12 bicycles, 1 CB radio, 3 stereo components, boat gas can, cassette unit, code -a -phone answering machine, 1 Crossman c02 rifle, and also other city property no longer needed. Newspaper legal noti ce, flyers, and newspaper article will be used tc notify the public. To: Mayor Butler and Orono Council Member3 �y��) From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City AdministratorM/Jy Forwarded recommending the rescheduling of the date from August 17 to August 31, 1985. To: Mayor Butler, Orono Council Members \ggs�n From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administratoil°'"-u Date: August 21, 1985 Subjects Temporary Patrol Officers Due to a specific law that addresses a Sheriff's Department providing either individual or total services on a contract basis to a community, it will be required that we pass resolutions entering into a Joint Powers Agreement for the limited duration for this assignment. It is recommended th '. the Council pass a resolution permitting establishment o such a Joint Powers Arrangement. Since this requirement was only realized in review by the County Attorney yesterday, we are presently having language drafted regarding it. Prior to the establishme t of a Joint Powers Arrangement, based on this resolution, we"Unter into a letter of intent in order to start by September 1st, 1985. Any further questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. uIU„w: vAETING 4;1iI Ut UkONO O fOilO Coin'\\ (Yle�i-1fw� ` Pek5U5+ ZG, IC' 8S A RESOLUTION ORDERING ABATEMENT OF HAZARDOUS BUILDING ACTION AT 2695 CASCO POINT ROAD WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Ron Noland 4651 Nicola, Egan, Minnesota 55122 the fee owner of record of property; and WHEREAS, Builders Finance, 1055 Wayzata Boulevard, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 and Chuck 6 Sheri Ost, 8035 Erie Avenue, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 have an interest in the property located at 2695 Casco Point Road, Orono, Minnesota, herein referred to as "property and legally described as follows: Auditors Subdivision No. 265 P.I.D.: 20-117-23 23 0003 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono, having duly considered the matter pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 463.25 to 463.251, hereby finds that the above described property is unhabitable and contains hazardous conditions which constitute a public nuisance and which makes this property hazardous to the public health, safety and welfare based on the following findings: 1. Building open to public. 2. Building has not been backfilled - excavation around building and in garage (attached) 8'♦ deep. 3. Orders to correct these hazardous conditions were issued by the Building Offical on 7/5/85 and 8/16/85. These orders have not been complied with. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows: 1. That the City Council of the City of Orono, pursuant to the foregoing findings and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Sections 463.25 to 463.251 hereby orders the owner(s) of the subject property to correct on the property these hazardous conditions within the time as follows: a) Building boarded up - 10 days. b) Hazardous excavation - 15 days. Page I of 2 2. The City Council of the City of Orono further orders that unless this corrective action is taken as follows: a) board up windows within 10 days, b) excavation backfilled within 15 days enforcement of this order will be made by the City of Orono. 3. That the City Council of the City of Orono further orders that if the City is compelled to take corrective action herein all necessary costs expended by the City will be assessed against the real estate concerned and collected in accordance with Minnesota Statute, Section 463,22, 4. That the City Council of the City of Orono hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor, City Administrator, City Attorney, and other officers and employees of the City to take such action, prepare, sign and serve such papers as are necessary to comply with this Order and to assess the cost thereof against the reai estate described above for collection along with taxes. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, this _th day of , 19_ APPROVED: ATTEST: Mary C. Butler, Mayor Dorothy M. Mallin, C ty Cler Page 2 of 2 To: Mayor Butler, yyVi:Gf: i�tETlN6 Orono Council Members -9,v'�'Ifivh�� Urzs From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato Date: August 21, 1985 CITY OF ORONO Subject= Administrator's Information TEMPORARY PATROL OFFICER - It is anticipated with the letter of intent, that will probably be signed Monday or Tuesday, that we will be able to initiate the services of the Sheriff's Patrol Officer starting Sunday, September let, 1985. It is anticipated that the individual assigned to this ta::k will not only be a person who has been with the Sheriff's Department several years in a patrol function but most probably be an officer who has had patrol experience in Orono. HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR - The kick-off meeting for the Highway 12 study will be held on September 26th, 1985 at 7:30 at Orono Schools. This kick-off will be for the Council Members, Planning Commission Members and the land owners affected, and will be a presentation by Mr. Shardlow as to the area included in the study objectives. CRYSTAL BAY APPRAISER - To date we have contacted two appraisers and only one of them has given us a quotation. We are presently seeking additional quotations and hopefully will bring this back to you on the 9th of September. ROVEGNO FENCE - At the Planning Commission meeting it was their decision that the construction of the fence was not in accordance with the ordinance. Staff is communicating with Mr. Rovegno to submit a variance application for the September 16th, 1985 Planning Commission meeting. GAS SPILL - On August 14, 1985 at 10:30 p.m. approximately 75 gallons of unlea o gasoline was spilled while fueling a City vehicle. The fuel was retained in an excavated area at the intersection of Crystal Avenue and South Brown Road. The fuel was pumped into 55 gallon drums and disposed of according to methods recommended by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The following day one foot of earth was removed from the retention area and air dryed in a safe area as recommended by the MPCA. The officer involved has received an oral reprimand. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS - At the last Planning Commission meeting the Commission was given several zoning ordinance amendments but due to the fact that it was 12:30 before that item on the agenda was reached, they decided to table that until their September 16th, 1985 meeting. MOODY'S MUNICIPAL CREDIT REPORT - Please see attached report. SMITH -POWER'S SEWER MATTER - To date all the appropriate documents have seen or are being • goad and appropriate checks being delivered. It is anticipated that construction of the sewer will commence next week. Memo 085-32 Tot Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Proms Thomas M. Kuehn, Finance Director Dates August 21, 1985 Subjects Moody's Municipal Credit Report Attached are copies of the Moody's Municipal Credit Report for Orono dated June 10, 1985. The report revises the rating for all City of Orono bond issues, increasing that rating from Al to As. An analysis of the City is included showing the reasons for the debt rating upgrade. The City's bonds were originally rated A in 1963. The rating was last upgraded to Al in 1974. G1l�7�41i f� F.UG2G CITY OF Moody' Municipal Credit Report Orono, Minnesota June 10,S9g5 CIf)i ;I O�iI;N0 Review General Obligation/Special Tax Moody's rasing: Aa (rndasd from Ad) opinion: Excellent financial operations are supported by a grade secunly is afforded Accordingly, the rating large and growing tax b.ise. Combined with high has been reseed from AS to Ao, wealth levels.md tan improved debt position, high koy faclic Debt Burden 1.9% Owner Occupied Median Housing Value. Payout. Ten Years: 93.6% 1980: S97,100 Average Annual Growth, F.V., 1980-84: 9.0% Unemployment. Hennepin County 3/95: 4.0% F.V. per Capita, 1984/g5: S63,760 General Fund Balance in % Median Family Inoome. 1990: S35,223 Revenues. FY 1994. 100.8% onafyalc Excellent financial open itiom have been mamusinn rah consistently stable General Fund balances, at June 30. 1994, the balance represented over 100% of operating revenues. Steady tax have growth has enabled the city to reduce the tax rate while still supporting the city's operations. The location of the community within commuting distance of the Twin Cii in and on Lake Minnetonka accounts fir the predominately residential us have and should continue to be a strong factor despite the lack ofdivenity Socianonom.c mdicn.ire among the highest in �'� IVT-- -"4m-- the state and county unemployment remains bet" state and national avenge. Debt position is favorable with modest debt burden and rapid payout. Proceeds of this financing will fund unitary sewer improvements; the city intends to issue an additional $I million in the next one to three yean for more sewer improvements. AI this time. we have aho reviewed and revised the sting on Orono sultaid road bonds to Aa. This ennew was prepared in conjunction with the cdy's sale of S900.000 general obligation improvement bond vlc ,in June 10, 1995. General Obligation/Speelal tat June % 1985 Orono, Minnesota rating hislery: August 1963. A August 1974: Al anotW: C. Murta MvJ••InWmb.vlu.N.u.nl.luiw•xml xu..n valy f•Txrpun M,b•ry�nlnwn+Ib inl.vnMnw'�nen k.lVxn tlwnW lam wMwnlmka.xnlrM .e4M lv., linuW.N lk lnrhl,I. �IMunWnn l•u.n1xlxrmN vnK'In,.v wIM Y,Mv.nliry. xn�pn.ni.s rn�rgVYlnr.slu •ell nJlk,u rw,nnx PTM .n,M Nn gMnNkwvxTl o.4L wa nu . mAla..WxrAe.tl nu�.w.+uuJ,WnJwo.I wl.�r 4..J~nM x. M.Vnln nr.Yr lv.nn/n,rPn/M.n rn�l,nl'.rwe nrA nr��NhvJWn v.� N.��� �••nvrt „r\I, we\�w�kk In ••w lw M. prvnen m,ryM1�n equal n.F •Ine�N.eJ\.rk,Y•.nAa, Pv.n. .ny. o.wr'�n. N.Vx �N'n Vk� lvx \, k.. vN .Imra.w �n.v lu IVAUMµ mbmou.. gnaw Mt6n.s rr,n \.r\n. Nl 1Ue General Obligation/Special Tax June 10. 19f6 Orono, Minnesota Mbl factom. Debt State "IOS016/1/55($000) ilondeddebt-mlslandmg a] $3.390 Grins bonded debt $3,390 Gross and net direct debt S3,390 Overlapping debt 4,755 Overall net debt 118.195 lb Fundum fund IM debt Woupton of AprJ I. 1985 are It.I 11.W1 91 hwludn Srm tall aeserJ oanptxw 6nrlda b 4 wW m lane to. 1995. For additional informstion plesse refer to Moody'% 1995 Municipal and Gmrmmrnl Manu:d, page 2309. to. SeculltV: G.t )., ULT and special asaeament. Defaults- No record found Debt Ratios Role of Retirement Net Per 10 Medlon Principal Amount %01 Debt _ Capita 01 Medlon all, F.V. (%) ArTlaant Due ($ 000) TOpI Direct S 493 S 792 0.7 2.4 In 5 years 51,9s0 57.2 Overall 1.196 S1,064 1.9 3.6 In 10 years 2,835 1116 '& For eon nth ran,a Won under mast Use of Proceeds: Sanitary sewer improvements. CIP/Fldufe Borrowing: $I million move for Structure: Rapid rate of retirement, drehning debt sanitary sewer Improvements in the neat one to servtce requirements three yeah. adrMtalstraEM Form of Government MaSor-council, appointed Pudic Employees: 37 full-time. 7 pan -time, factors: administrator Three are numbers of PERA 25 are enrolled on .nndm:Itnl plan. 148e contributions to PER.A amounted to $93,372. WeMt1y Orono vakeeftaa and Fiscal Assessed % Tag Rala per levy %Td01 beat year_ VoluaRan(F1g0) Change $10111111) AV. (000) COIISCNO 1981/112 $79.735 12.6 510.83 Sect 99.11 19s2/83 90.133 13.0 10.59 956 98.62 1983/m 95,IW 3.6 11.22 1,067 96.52 1984/85 102.077 7.2 9.79 1.001 In Prates General Obligation/Speclat Tax June 10, 1965 Orono, Minnesota 19fM/85 Full Valuation: M$437.714,955 1983 EARC Sale, Ratio: 88.2% 1984/85 Equalization Rate: 23.3% Average Annual Growth F.V.. 19M84: 9.0 e n;A..... .aurka W-d.l by EAaCsales noo, 1984/85 Full Value per Capita: $63.760 1984/95 A.V. Largest Taxpayers Bu1Nle is ($OOO) Wayzata Country Club Private Club 824 Washington Scientific. Inc. Precision Machine Corp. 767 Van Dale. Inc. Automated machinery 707 Individual Re,idential 354 Individual Residential 470 Individual Residential 450 economic ►opulation: Orono facials: veal ____elation %Chorge 1970 6.787 _ 1980 6,845 0.85 1982 est 6,865 0.29 loealron; Fifteen miles west of Minneapolis on Highway No. 12, Northern Shore of lake Minncim". Area: 15.3 square miles Population DeneBy: 449 per square mile Pop•."•ttlon and Mousing CharacterhRos: Orono CIN State U. S. Poptgallon; 1980 1980 1900 Median age 31.8 29.2 30.0 % school age 23.9 21.2 20.9 %working age 62.3 59.4 60.7 65 and over 7.7 11.7 11.3 No. pennns/household : 99 2.74 2.75 Income; Median family income 535.223 521.185 319.908 below Poverty Icvel 2.5 9.5 12.5 Perupitamcome S15.t78 $7.452 57,313 Mousing: %owner occupied 89.6 7.16 64.4 91, built before 1939 2112 33.3 26.1 C, built since last census 19.8 21.2 259 Owner occupied median salue $97. IOU 554.300 547,300 Median gross rent $154 $236 $243 tkcupied housing snit. 2 291 5our". ll S. Census Bureau General Obllgotlon/Speclal Tax June 10, 1985 Manciol toetors: Orono, Minnesota Labor Mahet Cha ted4tics: Hennepin County 96 % % Civilian Total Unemployed Unemployed Unemployed Year labor Force EmploypteM County state U S. 1975 4%,826 470,332 5.3 5.9 8.5 1976 301,527 475.36 5.2 5.9 7.7 1977 517.156 496,057 4.1 5.1 7.1 1978 492.933 467.622 3.2 3.8 6.1 1979 494.975 478,835 3.3 4.2 5.9 1980 510.591 499,579 4.1 5.9 7.1 1981 526.659 504,989 4.1 5.5 7.6 1982 527,698 495.658 6.1 7.8 9.7 1993 534,920 500,537 6.4 8.2 9.6 1964 550.539 525,064 4.6 7.1 7.5 3/95 5a),604 515.8% 4.6 7.1 1.1 3/95 46,473 526.611 lA 6.5 7.5 Source: Department of labor, Bureau of Labor Sratntics. 1965 Washington Scientific Gldustnes 300 Van Dale, Inc 225 Orono Public Schmis 202 Wayne County Club 117 Source. lMfoal Statement r Spring Hill Conference Carter 83 Gray Freshwater Biological Ins[. 52 Tyri s Super Value 33 Four National Bank of the lake. 20 Frnhwater Foundation II Operating Funds Financial Penormance IBscal Years ended 12/31 IT 000) 1985 _ 1983 +. 1964 %Change Revenue $1.%5 S2.147 ---Budget $2.034 _ 9.1 Expenditure, 1.727 1.999 2,034 94 Operating surplus l 238 259 6 8 •:llmrnl� Zr 4n,rr IuW, Imo.w.a mnnod Ada^rwnnn/1 :1 Omnnl tuna .1, l V,uWnN 1914 sou2ef of Ro9erws % Taae 41.5 Intetgovemmental revraue 192 Charges 1" wnnm 204 I.leensrs end permas 40 Imena nn n,,lrn t• 64 1914 Items ofE e�rWBr_w_----" % PuMIc safely 48 5 General gnvemmrnl 23 ; 5rrerrs l9 I Parks! recreation • ,ah. ) . Dew vervme T : + ' Mannry,{.YM n � W nra,,.en General obligation/Special lax June 10. 1965 Orono. W lnesota General kind Rnanclal Poafion (fiscal Yeas ended /2/31 3 000) 1963 fit 4964 Cash and immlments $1.904 f2.115 Operating Inane - Othercurrmthabilitir% 127 152 Year-end cash wrplue 51.777 S1.9f2 Receivable, S 125 S 169 Fund h.Imer S1.906 S2.165 Undoignuled hmd baler_. S1.69/ $1.929 CaeWu.l 017670A0 ■ Conlact Valerie Hendy. Communications Editor Moody's hoveatoa Service Key to Moody's Municipal RaBngs 99 Church St.. New York. NV 10007 Telephone: 12121553-0341 M dy's ratings provide myconn with a simple system of gradation by interest and pnceippaeI paybeens may be very moderate. and thereby nor which the relative Investment qualities of deb, instruments may he well a.( ... rded during both gad and bad times over the future tJn- noted cenruuy of psnnmm sit ... cn.rises &,nds Tn thin class. There am nine basic rating categories for long-term obligations. They B ,--Be from ACC (highest quality) to C (lowe%T quality) Bonds in the W, A. Mot b ead � ,mined which Maly i believes tu. x ilia Bonds winch arc rated ell lacy chvamnsuca of the desrublc yang t inrolmen, tiobuta are desig ted by The symbols Anal. estmem. A ... ranre s f nmrnl and principal payments or matme, ploy y Al. Wow, MI end N. nano o! other terms of the contnm aver an Y g p,rud of time may y There are four raring cetegerW for short-term obi ge um, all of which be small. define an mcnhment gg ado o utualum Thearc designated Moody', Investment Grade resMp 1 through MID A. Coo In the eau of variable .Is demand obligation, (VRD0,d, two ralmp Bonds which are rated Coo are of pcor ataMing. Such names may be in defaull or there may be present elements of danger with respect to are assigned; one representing an evaluation of th, kgrte of risk aam- principal m interest coned pole scheduled prim.r end interest payments, and the other reprearnung an evaluation of the degree of risk aasaiated with the CO demand feature. The short lerm raping assigned to the demand feature Bonds which are rated CC represent ubhpunns which are apau'+w< of VRDns is designated as VMIG (pronounced yAa MID) When no m a high degree Such man are oven m default or have other me. rid nuns., pyybed tube long to shnrvtcon open ofa V Rryo.I will the boomerangs. Definitions of Bono Ratings Aaa Bonds which arc rated 1M am judged to be or the hair quality They carry the amdlar desist of investment auk and ere generally referred to a Be,,"edge. - fareres, pyments art ordec,ed by a large or by an erc"Peco 'lly suede martin end principal is secure. While the vanoas proTre o_ elements are likely to change. tech aharBes a can h vismb sad tie mini unlikely m impair, rho fundamentally iron, pasiuon of le Aa Bond, which are rated As. arc Judged m be of high quality h, all standards. Together with the Asset group they camynu whet are g,m orally known as high grade bonds They are rated lower than the best Mtdr M1ecauu magma �( protection may not be a large a in ACa saumes or Bumteaion.: pmtanlve ekmrnu may be ultimate, ample. rude or (here may be other elements present which make the long-term asks appear nmewhat larger thrtr m Asa se urrim, Bonds which as teed A Induces many favorable mvnlmenl .tributes and are 1. be considered as upper meth m Bade obligations. Fetters gnmg security to pnncipel and oure ar, considered adequate, bur dements may &, presem ni mMpot . muepribday to trope rmrn[ time time in the metre. Boa B.nde which arc tared Ma aonsidered at medmin Brad, obhga- tione. I e. they art neither highly protected nor pool, secured Inter as, p yment% and principal wanly appear adequale far thr present bar certain protector elements may be Tism, o, may b, characlenam call, -mel able rive any g... I length of mmr Such &,ads lack .1 sr.ndo, m ru item she ... e ernno end in fact have gwcidea re chat. acunuws w writ Ba &nwh which on .,.it Vic are lulled m have apn Mauve eemen[s. ,hey faure canna the .....domed se even watered afire the prose, rmn of Bonds which ere rated C arc the lowest rated clef of bonds, and asues so rated can ber regarded as having emocrody pour prospects of ever meaning any real investment sundrng. Con ( ! Bonds for which The secunly depends upon the completion ofsome act or the fulfillment of some condition arc rated conditionally. These are Mndssecuredby (a) earnings of projects under construction, III) con. rags of projects nu.mned in operating experience. (c) rentals which begin when fadtees am so.yleted, or (d) paymentsm la which scan, other trading counter. mooches. Parenthetical mina devotes proba- ble India statute uPm camplmmn of canstroaueln or elimination of bash of cmedom. Definitions of Short -Term Loon Ratings lamermc,l'ea wasaaiaed nthMgaYMq Hoop ere Ichate. fiM by dam oh . date of m.md,y or matudtien or an saturation date and descriptionforms to distinguish each rating frin a ratings. Each ravng dais an a notorque with no implTrntlrte a to any other umimr time of the time obb"r MID Hangs urmmrte at the'mire. men[ of the margabon while VMID rung aopnatnn ..It bs a footnote of each .user's specific Cr ectural a ,.the futures. MIG 1/VMIG 1 The desanerme dentin best y.let, There is mrun, ,rang motm- ,von by mmlduhed cash news, superear hqudtlY %airport "I d,mom straled broad -baud access la the market for refinancing. Mlr, 2/VMIG 2 This devgnaiot denotes he la quality Margins, lectiam are ample although nor so large as m ,he p.Mr., group MIG 3/VMIG 3 )'his denigrator. denies favorable gwbty All seeurny elements ice accounted for but there a lacki a, the undeniable,rese of the pert, ceding grade Liquidity and cash flow, protection may he narrow and market access fell minenang rs likely 1. to I,, well eauWnhed. MIG 4,fVM1h Tlus desunelnn dmorn adequate gnal,n Pr..,aIon tonnnoo.I, m prided n required If an mvesrmem .,aunty I, ymxnr and although n.st dt,mah or predommwnh speculates,. there n q aifm rid A n. k0oixglail CITY OF u4070 '"Pt-hU 41 HC r F A Y R )!9 GR133 GRO3" EKC7ALLOJ A•IDERSJ.J AL 31 2t966.81 1498•12 d ENS ON MR 12 21753.25 '? BEH4HAROSU Mr 12 12353.94 1692.32 BODLIEN 3A 31 1G573.46 521.15 BR!NER CA 90 168.00 3•1C BR!NKHAUS JF 42 IR902.37 1398.1R 13URRASTER 90 31 20620 J8 1367.46 CARLSON KJ 92 14366.78 1J78•)8 CHECK JM 90 130.35 1.r'1 CH_SY ICK GB 31 2:573. 26 1136.40 EOMUNOS P JO 318.75 3.31 EhRENBERO OL 9). R589.91 537.11 ENGLISH II IH 31 1"58% 64 322.a3 ERICKSO4 OJ 93 1692•.iJ 256.15 ERICKSO4 KR 31 2392754 1325.17 FRITZLER JM 31 22141:49 I35FO59 SAFFRON MP 33 17^40.24 1304.64 GALLO 3F 93 432.51 74.)0 GERMARDSO4 JR 42 2311200 1366.64 GREGORY JO 42 1674800 959.12 GRIFFITHS GE 31 11463.25 636.95 HALLIN )M 11 13882.74 917. 52 HA%SEN SC 42 15207.62 862. 34 HANSING :J 31 4189.81 425.13 HENNING JP )) 14SS.83 58.76 H IoUS 04 91 9963.99 575.75 JACUBS TJ 33 15386.iR 1187.72 JOHNS07 BP 31 23291.42 128106 KILBO MH 31 14947.)4 1473•90 KIPiYCZUK M 51 21 ?49.41 1152932 KNUTSON CA 15 11724910 692.24 KS:MMEL DL 93 "•'?^ -'•"' KULHN TM 15 2179C•9) 1284.72 Le1YIN JC 15 159749' 7 917.52 NABUSTH JA 33 2J720.45 1221.67 MANUEL :M 9) 396909 403.23 MCG•)JAN LP 9^ 17635.36 1J51.52 MJP)YCZYN3 J 31 21576.99 i411.59 MR is FT 61 1326103 741.'4 NAJQ TL 11 IJ149.23 623.52 OAS 00 95 5120JO 0.341 OMAN LE 33 1)594.10 624•01 PALMER PB 31 427.'3 92.30 PEARSON SC 31 216CS944 1311."9 PLTERSJI 'L 12 M^.6.63 275.40 PEYERSON AK 9R 618.�) 52..7d PROVO MJ 12 7869•34 356.25 JUAST aA 92 15941.48 1)C2.3) SASS JJ 41 15253.46 •61.62 Z G w Lam I. V CITY OF J-31 P A Y 7 Y.T.O . EMPLw NO NAVC OIV GROSS GROSS EKo/ALLM SELLNER ^_L 03 O,9U ).)) SELSTAO EP 93 O.^0 ).)0 SKPEEN OS 42 15295.I6 R66.44 SLISC SR 93 1629,75 243.60 SMITH JR 92 16JS3.26 R19.T4 S7?F FENHAB RE 93 16334.63 963.)4 STc:VENS RG 93 2029.39 216.25 THI S RR 90 ISSS.51 204,)0 TOMCZYK My 51 V 917.59 1368*38 YOYTCKE SM 31 63975 23.J0 COUNT GRAND 42.017.0 PAID :.51 TOTAL "161 TOTAL TOTAL FICA TAR GROSS = 22I195074 EMPLOYERS FICA A = GROUP HEALTH B = PHVSICIANOS HEALTH PLAN C = BLUE CROSS/dLUE SHIELD 0 = MEDICAL CENTER PLAN E = PRU7EATIAL F = COOPD. HEALTH CGRE G = MINNESOTA 440 H = TrtA%S_AMERICA q:C. I = BANKERS LIF_ J = MUTUAL 3ERV:CES K = MUTUAL JF VIA4A L = EMPLOYEE'S BENEFIT = ACT NA N = NICOLLET CITEL 0 = LEAGUE OF 7ITITS 2 = HEALTH CAP- "A:NT ACCT. MILSINJ MfSt C70E FLA SOMF '4=L'S 1995 CITY OF uRaVJ nHCCN •EGISTER f CHECK 00. DATE AMOUNT vC ND 03 ITEM DESCRIPTION f 238019 c6 naIas 25.29 .FRICAN .INrR OL9010ROS PNT 236036 O8/221AS 64.26 RNC43A PAPER OFF SUPPLIES ( 236034 06/22t65 5.14 ANCHOR PARCH OFF SUPPLIES 23BU34 06122/1IS le.96 AMCN)R WIN Off SUPPLIES 239334 DAMIAN 62.10 \VC9DR PPER OFF SUPPLIES ( ZA IA U./22/R5 56.23 ANCHOR PPER 3F- SUPPLIES Z36334 U5/2215S 160T ANCHOR PAPER OFF SUPPLIES 236l34 0onals5 .To AYCM311 PA•ER OFF SUPPLIES ( 230034 09122/SS 1.14 ANCHOR PA-iR Off SUPPLIES 236034 06,22/85 1.2R ANCHOR PAPER OFF SUPPLIES 243.44 . ( 6 23W39 H.A n2105 513.13 EA Al. F ANDCRSON RISC AT RNT SUP 533.53 . 136065 06,22,65 53.33 BLAMAIA3 A SOU". RLDG/6R05 RNT i 2360" Donates 10OAO BLACx09IAx A SONS BUGIGROS RNT 236065 05/22/65 31.31 6LICNONTAE 6 SAS BLDSIADS PAT 196.11 . 1 a 13600T UHtntas 166.SO SURF L CARLSON IVC ST FRY SUP 166.53 . 6 23809- Ce/nls5 15.1.9 RUMASTCRNINTDR EQUIP/PTs1ACCr SS l 11.19 13e1t4 '1/zz/RS 41.2% C3C4 COLA VC10I46 BEER PAC. 2381z. -6122,85 462.90 COCA COLA VENDING NIN PUNCH • 2361za .a ni/55 655.10 COCA COLA VENDING COME RESALE 111T9.1S . i3912e CO1221e5 991.34 C14erpT RMAO-ILN Oro . IONSULT 953.36 o•u. • 23913 IS/221R5 .` COLOVIALIFE INS 0 HEALTH INS t SA17: ^S R!/!5 150 COlOVf\L LI iE 'MS CO HEALTH INC 4S.-O 16.26-95 ✓AGE 1 r ACCOUNT 40. UIY. F P.O. Y MESSAGE 21-4343-515-90 i ...-C6S / 01-4210-039-12 O1-4210-159-I4 6 01-4210-069-IS 01-4210-la9-31 pt.4210-1T4.33 f 01-4210-249-42 T2-4210-s49-91 T3.4210-569-92 f TM4210-590-93 f o.-Cks O1-4233-249-42 61 •.•-Cx5 B 01-4343.099-11 01-4345-290.61 9 T1.4143.s15.90 ••«us 01-1273-249.42 a 11-4232.129.31 a •...cxs s 71-4615-515.90 21-4e90-510.9E Ta-a e9z-svD-93 a «cxs s C+-4316-126-33 • •••-ENS • •+.a+s1-+ze- n 'f.N 51.129-31 • 199% CITY OF 3P040 chic. RE,ISTER C1.26.65 PAIk 2 CHECK 140. OATC A9344T TE4)01 ITEM DESCRIP^.ON ACCOUNT NO. INS. N P.:. A .ESSAOE • t34111 J5/22/65 162.23 CCMMIRIIAL *LOG 4hT JANITORIAL SEAT 01-4549-399.1? • 435131 05122/P5 111. 50 C044C ICI AL OL36 RRT JANITORIAL S•_P9 01.43~Z9.31 611.10 . • ....0 a«CRS MISS 06/22115 603 C144-4CT SALES TAX JUL■ SALES TAR Ot-3S00-000-OD Z1N113 08/2211S 15.30 CONN..EB SALES TAT JULY SALES MS 41-2222.300.30 • Z34133 08/22/45 4.051.70 CONA.R^T SALES TAR JULT SALES TAT ?1.2222-000.00 234133 46122/45 1.195.10 C'1MM.4ET SALES TAX JULY SALES TAN 14-2222.300-00 5.20.30 . 0 a u.. u.•CN5 • 25tl1 l9 :B/2L SS 43.25 CONNr4CIAL EMBLEM NEARING APP 01-4221-129.11 43.?S . • ...... ..«CAS Z39141 OP /2 M 14A.32 COPS Du- OR IMC OFF SUPP I1-4213-129.S1 • 143.12 . • ...... ...-CRS 234110 0122/63 )0.10 CJLLIGAN BLDG/IRIS ANT 01-4343.099-t? I3415I .6122/P5 20.11 CJLLI.AM hL)615ROS NOT T1.4343.515.90 • 236110 'tl tell"$ 33.10 CULLIGAN SLDGIGADS ANT /4-4345-590-91 $4.13 . 23513A .6122115 42.40 OAHLNEINEI GIST CO BEER PURCM ?4-4415-590.93 • 42.40 . • "• • • • ..«CRS 236163 G5122165 2.SSS.43 OAS 3I3TRIIUTt4G CO 4EER PUNCH 71-4415.515.90 238163 04122131 9?A63• NAY )ISTRI6UTIN4 CO JOT NET I1-41116-51S.90 • 239163 06122115 SS.53 OAS )ISTR19UTINS CJ AIR PUNCH ?1.4820.$15.90 234163 ON/22/65 30.•O OAS 913TRISUT146 C) BEER .URCN 14-46111-590-91 2.521.13 . • ...... ...cKS 23..6r 03/22145 ?.964.53 CAST ME 3ET'V4E BEEN AMC. ?1-4415-515.90 2S.1A1 JS/22115 21.23. EAST SIJO 3ESEAAGE SOT ACT ?1-4416-515.9G 2.939.10 . 216199 L9RLIA5 1.3J9.'D A1L• a 1.PTERSON AUG ASSESS SEAT 01-4371-J$9-14 IA ...... ....4w 1915 CITY OF ORON) CNCCR 9E^.[STEP 09•i6-35 PAGE 3 Y Cn TCR N^.. DATE AMOUNT VEN00. ITCH. ]ESCRIPTTON ACCOUNT 40. ENV. 9 P.O. 9 MESSAGE Y tl e2.: 116122185 29.60 EM9IM WING CO COYC RESALE I9-9 B72. 590-93 zv.6D . ...... ...-cis • atgt]. C6/22/65 26.20 FATTELER / MARK EAUIP/PTS/ACC•SS 01.4232-129-31 24.30 .. .•CRS 238251 Oe Ft2/35 1.is GOLDEN VALET CC CONF/SCMOOLS C1-4356-129-51 • 7.10 ...... ...-CAS Z3*2• L/22/l5 121.79 GENUINE PARTS CO EQUIP/PTSIACCCSS .4212-290-93 ild?56 236 iSe Ol /z2/65 GENUINE PARTS CO EWiP/PIS/AC C[35 R-6212-590-97 7 • 53.33 15!•73 ...... ....CAS • 139219 W/}1135 96.55 iLCNW700 IYGL EV000 UTILITIES 31-6 324.099.17 96.511 . • ...... ....CAS • I3A261 DAIWA$ 217.95 4000IN CO EQUIP/PTS/ACCESS 73-4232-T69. 92 J1 F.05 • .o u. ...CRi 236ITZ 16/21/85 91.13. G t ( 3ERfT CC WIAR.NG APP 01-4221.249.62 • 236z/z :6/22191 91.'1 G t ( SE9Y 7 CIS /EAR140 APP C1-6221.149.42 236}F2 rV/22/95 91.,C G t . S(9vt Cr4 WEARING A[P 01-6221-249-62 236272 39/22/35 15.)s 0 t R SE197CES ST PNT SUP 01-4233-240-42 • 136272 36/22/35 61.23 6 6 ( SEPYICES M4T BLOC/cR04 01-4345.099.17 23627i 25/23/45 55.43 G t ( SE-dlCES MAT RLOG/6ROS 01-4345-12%It 236272 1.6/22185 2].16 6 G M SEPYICES WEARING AF0 72-6221-599-91 • 1362F2 79/22/65 4.61 G t . 3PVTCES �TIL STS ON? SUP 72-4236-549.91 ls922Y ISIW45 z.RO G t - SEP.ICFS M4T BLOG/0R03 77-4345-549-91 239272 )6/22/95 33.24 G A ( SERVICES WEARING APP 73.4221.569092 • 236272 36/22/IS 6.11 G t R SCpVIC•5 UTIL SYS MNT SUP 73-4236-f69-92 23627Y 76/tall! 4.23 c 6 . SERVICES FAIT BLOG/GROS 73-4343-369.92 a1s277 )6/2211S 15.13 n t ( SERVICES NEARING AW 74-6z21-590-93 • 231.6s . ...... ...ACAS • ill ll9 r6122185 .50 MAPPTi POT6TR CHIP .ONE BL'AL[ iM 6a02.A0.93 44 u.sG . • ...... ..� to 2Jtl An YR2/.5 61.11 MAARIS OF=ICI EQUIP NNT OFF EQUIP 11-4340-129-31 196S CITY OF 000'1) ;HECK-EGISTFR Oh26-35 PGGt A • CHECK NO. GATE AMOUR. V.NBOS ITCM OCSCPIPT:ON ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9 P.O. S MESSAGE • 61.11 . • •••••• .—CKS 25e2v5 UB/22/95 SR.30 HENNE-tV :0-0P SCCO BLUGfSROS/PNT i1-4151.290-61 S..;B . • 236321 OB/ii/e$ 47.10 Ike. IACP ANNUAL CONE 11-4 156-129_31 8100 . «cbs 23633C C4/22/85 F19.O2• I:04 3ETR4IT :OR- ICMA 7/29 TO Rill 01-4140-339-12 • 239330 Willis 119.02 !CMA Pr TRMVT CORP IC44 FF29 TO bill I1-4140-039-12 23633U OR/ii/s$ 71.92 TCNA QFTRM%T COOP ICNA IF29 TO 9111 01-4140-039-12 T1.92 . • .-CAS • 25tl333 -,1221E5 108.12 ALLIES 6 50N BLOC/4ROS MAY 26-6231-S90-93 101.12 . • ....•• .. r C" 236365 _e 12116S 23.59 JAC04S-TOR MILEAGE Ot-A161-12.-33 • 23.5R .....• ...-CAS • 234312 .a 222/65 31.22 JOHNS AUT) SUPPLY EQUIP/PTS/ACCESS 01-4233.129.31 ,163/2 '.n 122IR5 61.:3 JOHNS AUT3 SUPPLY EQUIP/PTS/ACCESS "-a2524A9-A2 • 99.2s ...... ..rC" • 23431s .6122165 lit." JOH4301 PIPET co STORE SUP 11-1230-515-90 IS1.FF • NNP• ..—Cos • 23035 )6/22/9$ 9.11 KO11E119$ 3RUG OFF SUPPLIES 01.4210-196-33 236385 J9/2iPBs '.:] HUVENFS )RUG EOJIP/PTSACCESS 09-4232-129-31 236343 )s/ails$ t,25?.:J KEAIENlS OAUG STORE REST Ft-1332-515-90 • 136355 U6122/85 5.52 KFNENTS )RU9 UTIL STS MAT SUP F1-4236-S69692 2393RS -6/2219s 2.41 KFav:*As ]RUG OFF SUPPLIES F4.4210-590-93 t .13n, 13 . • .....• NrCRS • e5R 393 CP/tl/ss '1).'2 ROPTJCRS :ALES/SO .41 RISC 'QUIP 11-4362-290-61 JT . • •. u.. ..r CRS 19-S CITY OF GROVO CHECK RESISTER 0e-26-85 PAGE 5 • ENE:. NO. ❑ATE 1-OJNT OrNo01 ITCH OESCNIPTIOV ACCOUVT 40. INW • P.O. A MESSAGE 238135 16/22/15 276.26 LSOIS/SUIT[ 371 ACHIM SER V-JULY 01-43$2.069-15 236435 OR/12/95 9.40 LOGIS/IJITE 32- C WRIER 10-JULT M-A 353-069.15 23e43S 18/22/45 901.64 L2G15/SUIEC 37^ DATA PROC-JULY C1.4355-069.15 25845S Ce/12/es 63.11 LOOTS/SJItE sn AOMIN SEP"JULY 72-63SZ-549-91 238435 Js/22/85 12s.19 LOGISLSUITE 32' DATA PRGC-JULT 72-435S.S69-91 23b435 UP/22/4S 79.S7 LOGIS/SOTTE 32G AORIN SER"JULY 73.4552-SG9.92 256435 CA/22/95 315.73 L90I5/5JItE SID DATA PROC-JULY 73-4SSS-569-92 1.7W.S0 . 236637 05/22/95 655.66 CITY 0• 016 LANE OFF RENT Ot-4311-129-31 68S.66 • ...... ..—Cgs 238456 39/22/85 "./0 NA9l3TR-JEANTE MTG EXPENSE 01.4382-114.33 39.10 . ...... ...Cgs 230460 tuns PARR WIT SALES EPURCN 11.4e12-515-90 23 6D 64 0/225s 1 02/2215 4.190.55 MARK WIT SALES BEEN PUR [M 7b A81S-S1S-90 271A60 Ds/22/B5 .50• MARK Y!} S\LES BOi RET 71.4e16-S15.90 A,595so3.3D . ... u. ..CAS 25"" C6/22/85 3e..i5 MARTINS NAYARRE 66 ART AUTO 01.4311-129.3t 3e8. 5 ...... •...CKS • 23 ella /tl /22185 11.531. N!iH PASTE COYM lK NYC C-SCPT 1S-t2R 2-000•BC 11.531.43 • ...... ..Cgs • 23846n r0122185 2.621.10 RIOKEST ASPHALT ST PAT SUP 01-4235-219-11 2.627.So • ...... ..—Cgs 239485 U6/21/35 29.41 MPLS OTrGEV CO RNT RISC E901. 31-4317-249.12 • 29.40 .. u•. ..•-CMS • 2 Je 3]! ^s/R/eS 64.J3 RIMY °i PC IRE "If RISC Coup 01•a 312-1I9. 31 6A. .`0 . � ...... ••.-CMS O 23e521 JW/12/R5 A01ns -IT 37ST :0 CWItP/P1./ACCer- n-12 �:-SVO-v1 / 1905 c1ty Of ORONO CNECM RE'•I5t!R 28-20-85 PAGE 6 1 CHECK NO. O&T2 APOJ41 VE400• 11EN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT 40. INA. A P.D. A MESSAGE 1 234522 .3122185 631.98. R:T )IST :) EWtPfPTE/ACCESS 14-4252.590.93 238522 LB/I2/6S 0.91 NIT O!ST C3 EWIPI►IS/ACCESS 74.4232-590.93 AP,9R . 0 ..-CAS ...... • 2505/ J6 R2f s5 16.33 CITI 01 MINNETRISTI TREE DISPOSAL 01-4391-249-42 IWO ....Cgs • ...... 236548 C6/22/ss 9.71 NAV6N0 HARDWARE &LDGfGMOS SUP 0+_a 231-290.tl • 239768 o6F22/ss 26.66 44VA401 NIIDGARE EWvfPTSfACCESS 01-4232-129-31 236348 08/22/15 51.97 NAMR49 HARDWARE EQUIP/TSIKCESS 11•4232-174-33 236566 U6I22/85 b•s NIVAMO MAROMARE EGUTP/PTS/ACCESS 11-4232-249-42 • Z3111,46 n6/22/I5 3.12 NAVLRNE NlRONN C EWP/►TS/ACCCSS /1-6232-51S-90 254545 96/22155 15.19 N&vaRRE HIROMAIE EWIPf►TS/ACCESS 72.4232-549-91 231349 .1/221PS 39.12 NAVNRD 46RDVARE EQUIP/PTSPACCESS 71-4232.$69-92 • 139546 OB122195 59.73 NAVARRE HARDWARE BLOG/ORDS WP 74-4231-S90-93 236540 05122/65 112.13 4AVNRO 4ARDVARE EGJIPPPTS/2CCESS 76.4232.590-93 299.9s . • ...CAS As236S3J '_P/22/15 111.1) NELS)V ETERPRISES LID PURCII TJs10.515.90 23s5SU 75/222A5 171.-1 NELS31 ENTERPRISES NONE PURCN 71-H12. S1S•9C 2f BS5P L6/2tl.5 S.i] 4EL314 EMTERP2;SL5 BEER PIµ CN 71.4s15-515-90 • 2S4550 a/22I SS 1•:l NELSGI ENTERPRISES NIS PUNCH IR-6620-515-90 z vz.$) ...-CAS • ...... 219559 ^&122/83 799.I6 NsP ST LITES OT-632S-249. 42 • 2365S9 U8/22f11 362.16 Ns. UTILITIES 71-6324.515-91 23BS59 ^8/22/I5 I)7.12 RSI UTILITIES T3-4324-569.92 1.?6l,72 • ..._ns • 2f 6S 6/ 06/22/s5 13. 71 41114E9N r35 GE. POSTAGE 11.4321-339.12 1'.7P ...-CAS • ...... 236570 U6/22/83 19.50 No1T4vESTERN HELL TELEPHONE O1-43E0-249.62 1! 236570 JB/12/3S $1.16 MnRT.M±STEIN O'LL TELEPHONE 71.4320-515-90 238670 Os/22/85 11.12 4w3INarst ERN BELL ADVERTISING 11-4325-SIS-95 2363/0 26/22155 21.61 NORTIrESf ERN BELL 1ELEPHIIE 72-4320-569-91 r ISIS70 :B/22/IS 31.21 NOPfivESTEtft fV.LL TELEPHONE 73.4320-)69-92 133.44 • ....Cgs •..... tfe n/ J1122fas 59.9A PE+A PER& 7/29 TO R/11 D1-41A1031612 • 236S97 LB/21-65 7.9^ PERA PEA& 7129 to .111 11-4141-040-13 • .1915 Cliv OF JR011 CHECK REGtSrEA Ce-26.35 PAGE 7 6 CHECK NO. DATE 193J•1' vENOY ITEM OESCRIPT:ON ACC3UNT 40. IOO. R P.O. A MESSAGE 6 23e591 .6122/RS 1•53 "RL PE1A 7/29 TO I/11 OL4t4l.J59-l4 236517 09122/es 96.50 OrR, PERA 7/29 TO A/1/ )1.6161-069.15 236597 USIZ2185 51.22 PENA v[%A 7129 TO l/11 0/-4141-099-17 236sv7 U&/221N5 1.164.40 IrRA KRA P/29 TO 4111 11.6161-1/1-31 236597 06/21/85 62.16 PEP, PERO 7/29 TO R/11 -1.A161-115-31 i3est7 01/22/e5 706.56 PrR& PERA 7/2t TO 4/11 01-4161.121-31 25SSv7 US/22/e5 65502 PERA VETO F/29 TO l/t1 01-170-126.31 236107 06/22/45 194.71 PERA PERA 7/29 TO &111 01.6361-17" 33 25s597 46/22155 113.27 PIRA PERA FP29 TO 3111 0/-6745-269-62 236597 08/22/85 6{.13 PERA PERA 7129 TO 6/11 01-4161-290.61 236597 U6/22185 173.27 PERO PER& 7129 TO 8/11 71-4141-SIS-90 234597 U"22/95 96.47 PERA PENA 7/29 TO Sill 72.6141-549-91 • 256591 06/22/AS 131.42 PIRA PERS PF29 TO Silt 73.4161-S69.92 238397 OB/22/e5 66.23 PERA PER& 7/29 TO A//1 76.41A1-590-93 3029.15 • 235595 Ce/22/65 9.+0 P[PA INS LIFE INS 01.4152-120-11 v.]0 • ....•• ....Cgs • 23e6 ]e U6 fie P e5 626.10 PANNELL RERR FORSTER M AUDIT -FED PROG7AN 11-6300-361-03 626.)0 . • ...... ...Cgs 255611 C5122fe5 21F.SS PT -St cOLI/IUP NFLG RIF POACH 71-4920.515.93 • 21F.31 • ...... ...Cgs 236617 06/72/ss 255.95 PHOTO FACt9Rv OFF SUPPLIES 31-421D-t29-31 23561? 09122185 33.93 PHOT) 160 3" JPF SUPPLIES 11-4210-116-33 • 7S9.7s . ...... 234656 o6/22195 140.6S POGRESA DIST NINE PUNCH 7I.4■t2-SIS.90 236636 .6122,65 2.52G.RS ..GREAc DIST BEER PUNCH 71-6815-51$-90 • 236636 43/22/55 100.40. P504ERt OT3T nor RET 71.4e16-SIS-90 935636 36/zN/6S 29.92 POORE3s DIST WIN PURc. 71.66I0-SIS-90 2096.64 • • 23B&]A Os/22/Ss ZIS.13 .RAINIO OFFSET PRTOPPUBL OI.6S22-156.33 235.)O to •••os ...ells 236662 LN/2P1e5 211.15 1EFD CNNOI & T196cE0 CAC RESALE 7.-ISC2-100.93 AN 211.15 u•••• ...."a • 15666? .3/221SS 11.2s Pr. 1:st :) 5.0 6-E• PUNCH 11-6e1S-175-90 . 9 19.1 C!TI OF vRYN) CHECK •C.TSTSA 71-16-e5 PAGE S I I CHECK N0. DATE 1.9U ar 3!N0o1 TIER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT 43. I149. N P.O. I RES34K • • .....• ....CRS • • i ].4 R7 -e/22/65 1. ST PtUI l3QR QED suPPL iCs 71-4210-114.S! 19.59]9 • • • 115694 Se/22/85 e9.S4 ROAD ICSC3E --QUIP/PTS/ACCFSS r.1-4252.129-31 • 69.58 . • ...... ..«as • DS1 S1 YS/22/45 ISI.e9 STENAAN SAR02IC4 ANC CONC RESALE 74-4832-590-93 • 157.e9 . • ...... ..-Cxs • • 239740 06/22/95 4101 00N 3TREI:4ER GUNS OP! SUPPLIES 01-4210-12b S1 239740 SeR S1.•9 004 3TWI:NER GUNS 35 01-4252-129.31 • 239HO COMM 4NA9 004 Sf K I]YER GUNS OTHER/PTs/ACCE OTHER [Gulp 0/.4500-129-5/ • AS. R . • ...... . CRS • 236? 76 .e/22165 4,S53.15 TNOR•E MIT CO BEEP PUNCH 71-4815.515.90 • 239774 .e/22/95 31.60• T-ORPE ME CO VT 9ET 71.491e.515.9c • 4.519.55 . • ...... ••••CRS • 235179 )11271e1 4.213.50 TAW OIL :0 $4SOLINE Ot-12e0.300-01, • 235779 .,s/22/45 526.50 TRAC/ 3% CO tASOLIIIE 74-4220-590.93 • 4P4^.%0 • .. u,. -cgs • 136/e9 ,e/72/45 117.75 TORISTONC •111A RIG PUNCH 11-4820-515.90 • 117.13 • • ...... ...-CRS • • 2PN11 Oe R!/41 60.92 Nrsi00 SN: RRT WRIER RNMIT 72-4345-549.91 t^.92 . • f ..u.. ••CRS r 21ee 15 CeN2/55 99.11 NA-RIN9 LIVES INC EQUIP RENTAL ^I.43 S/•24P 42 • 99.10 • ••-u. •••CRS • 25es44 ^.//22/e5 4..57 NH!T- 3EA. AVI.AL CO ANINAL CAPE 01-4360.195-35 • 236864 .6/22/eS 4r -.13 14IT: 30- AVI-tt CO AN114AL -AVAIL 01_43e1.1tl5-15 • 1955 C!TT OF UR04J 1 C MECR LC T'_ fY01 YT • 4S6J] 23369. 'a at/aS 11.41 11.41 • t]6.70 .•/22 Ftl5 2800 26.+0 • 13 NJ1 04,12181 35.;o SS.10 ♦ 13.912 'A/le/e5 4:.:0 W .:O SS.)0 ♦ 23691A L6atlas /05.02 105.J0 • 2]NCS 08/22I65 233.10 202.30 • 236916 .tl/2r/+s 695.16 69S.50 • 2369'r •812218! 23.10 236VY 0e/221.5 23•30 40.'0 . • 2369'e .6I22 ns 6.3e 60.38 • • 234•31 .6 /22/65 .59 Is • a en;, ueti2260 75.10 75.10 . • lS PP11 06/zt/eS 35.10 350.10 • • 236912 u4/R/63 41.10 49.10 • 236913 06/22/9S 17.10 17.10 • M6q• • nests .6/ti/95 23042.12 :NECK REGI•T;R 3 26-45 PAGE Y00R ITEM OESCRIPTIOU ACCDUNT 40. 31•. • P.O. M MESSAGE •-•.CKS 2IEQLER IYC EQUIP/PTSIACCES' 71-4232.249-42 ...CMS ART OOERILLS OFF SUPPLIES 21-4210-1T4.33 WAND EOMARDS EDWARDS 932 01-2300.000-02 LA MREMCE S4RONER 6ARDNER 936 01-2300-000-00 NE0LU13/03RDON HEDLUND 912 01-2500-000.00 "PIS NO3 SESCAAC4 COIF/SCHOOLS 01-4356-129-11 MOMRTIN RTIN OTRCA CONSULT 01.43Ts-129.31 U04MI54 CSLF iUP PRT6/PUQL r4-4322-390-93 N.RIPS/KATE COMP/SCNSOLS 01-4356-039-12 K4RMES/ROTE COIFISCNOOLS 01-43SM114-33 MACOJEDN EQUIP EQUIP/PTS/ACCESS '1-42S2-249.42 4R OFF SUPPLIES n-4810-51S-9C ST-IR:/SPIRE LO•ERTISIAS ".43z3-S?S-90 SKART•r3 mas OFF SUPPLIES 01-4210-1Z9-31 SINKLERFM4RRTON SIMRLER 932 01-2300-000-00 2IL•ERMER6/ALM PAD SHOP RESALE FM4e01.590.93 •.P-CN3 0--. TAU:N •US 'MIU .5 41E 'JUMP TPUCK 14.-4$50.633." lies CITY OF JRN" • CHC" NO. DATE 6S1091 03122/AS K ra52 U6/z2/as KFasS 06/221es do KNse 35122,65 • Krasl U4122155 • K )UF Ua/22/8S • KT6Sn ,. 622 K I155 6122165 • K /t19 J1/22/85 K Fiyv )6/zz/65 KF61v Ca/22/9s K )65Y J4112153 K1419 is/altos do KF651 06/22/AS HC7659 O002z/N! KF659 "f22/as Al MCF659 C6/z Las K145. J6/22/as K hS9 16/82/65 K ra59 b/22/8S Kr&5Y Oa/22/85 1 AMOUNT 23.IQ._2 $51.5 S S1.95 17.43 1/.65 . 170.00 1T'.M0 46.30 46.20 . 37.20 . ra- 16.16 . S35.s- 10.6r- S22.RS . 211. 42 /.11 t.r1 160.14 18.61 69.77 323.10 532.22 0.56 104.27 61.07 12s.16 r5.36 I.SN..o . 21.T93.•l 62607 23.442.)2 11.12 25.666. S 3 621.Sa 12.624.15 A.lc7.�e 9r..ae.ar CHECK PEGTSTER V_NOOi TTEM DE3CRIPT7DN OUI:KTT OAR SUPPLY "IQ/MISC PURCH TIN J4:093 MILEAGE RISK CONT13L OTHER CNSULT JEtV 43o6E4AKER TERP EMP QUALITT VINE NINE FURCH OU=LITE VTNE MTNE DISC ES MILLI-S NINE PURCH Cl P41LLIPS NINE DISC ST TIE'S IS C31T FU FICA F/29 To e/11 ST T%!As sS CO4T FD FICA 7129 TO g/11 AT TIM SS colt FO FICA F129 TO gill $T WN'S SS :"1T FD FICA r/29 To t/11 At TAEAS AS C3VT FO FI:■ 7129 TO 9111 ST 24!AS IS CnIl FD FICA r/29 t0 alit ST TR rAs is COVT FO FICA F/29 To 2/il sT TtFAS SS CINT To FICA F/29 To gill St 11163 35 :31T FO FICA F/29 TO M111 SI It . SS COVT To FICA I/29 TO 6011 or It 3 Colt FD FICA T/29 TO Pill $T TR' s CONT FO FICA 7129 TO Pill ST It. .S CI1T FO FICA 7029 TO Alit FUND 71 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 1011 I1 f3t4L FED REVENUE SHARTVG FUND 'UNO 14 TOf RL IMPROVE A EQUIP )UTLAT I FUND at fOTIL PER" IMPRCVE REVOLVING F RUNS It TOTAL LIQUOR OPERATING FUND 1 Ago T2 f3lAL PATER OPERATING FJNO FUND r3 TOTAL SEVER OPERATING FUNJ 1'JIM Ia TOTAL %%F COURSE CPC04TIW FO TOTAL . P.d O-tl5 npLC 1", ...-CM_ s T1.t820-S/S-9p • •••-CMS 7t.t7g1-1F1-37 MANUAL • p1-t 3C M039-12 MANUAL 01-4120-115-31 MANUAL ) r1-4812-51S.9C MANUAL r1-4817-S1S-9J -ANUAL l 71-4812.515.90 MANUAL ) r1-4813-SIS-90 MANUAL 1 21-4142-019-1 MANUAL 21.4I42-0/0-13 MANUAL 1I-4142-059.11 MANUAL 1 DI-4142-069-15 MANUAL 31-4142.099.17 MANUAL 31-1142-IRS-31 MANUAL Dt-1142.1r4­33 MANUAL 71-11/2-249-61 MANUAL 71.1112-210. MANUAL A r/-11/2-513.9 UNUAL FS-NtZ-569-913 MANUAL P7-4142-5O-9 MANUAL 1 ra lux-s9o- vs3 MANUAL • •--as P J �I1! rii.i. MEETING AU G 2 6 1985 LIST OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL _ FOR MEETING OF August 26, 1.985 Clio Of ORONO Firearm use Permit - Robert E. Nash, 1020 ToWnline Road Maple Plain, MN 55359 On -Sale Liquor .:nse - William Wear 2160 West Wayzata Blvd. Long Lake, MN 55356 Solicitors License - Discount Flowers Al Penke Route 2, Block 223 Cokato, MN 5532I Septic Installers License - McCarty Water 6 Waste 62:,0 Highway 12 West Maple Plain, MN 55359 Duane Ritter Excavating 7120 Vernon Street Rockford, MN 9!'i'L4cf_1'12N trot Fllil'_A1.S!S-L-PERM II' PITY OF ORONO DDTE•.._.� P 4 . NAME: IT'Arn/! �.�,/ I kLt —.— ... ADDRESS • M97.0 I rx./+ w�l �� �+ • _ TYPE OF PERMIT DESIRED: ANNUAL �' 15-DAY_ ATE STARTING• e- T 4'i, DATE ENDING• -- -- _ PURPOSE: i - 9 . I agree that this permit doesn't allow the hunting of game birds or ya,•: animals in the city of Orono and agree to abide by all applicable fed- eral, state and local laws. FEE PAIDi DATE: g CHECK: AC SH: INITIALS: JM� SIGNATAPPLICANT RECOMMENDED: YES• Ny PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR APPROVED: ____ YES• - NO; CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR UI\VIYV ✓P,— ... .... ....... . ME 6 [EY CONTROL NUMBER IOCAI CONT. AOENCV NCIC IDENT IC.WI E C 1 /�/ M N 0 2 7 S / DA, L NBR �1 �D�ATEEE REPORTED III TIME RFD ITRPI LOCATION GRID NOR ILONI Ell/ Il� ' F 'R"/' — - " / / / / PLACE I p2 0jnA i./ L NBR ORD SQUAD OR BADGE p 180N1 TIME ASIU. tTASI TIME ARA. ITARI TIME CLR. ITCLI 5 O UCe OFFICER ASSIGNED/ F—. M I I SSIGNED/II f I VICTIM (PLC1 nm elm B 0 eeR nF Np rm IOFT U-1 tl Fil PHONE I OTHER REPORTS INCLUDED ImpwAS ❑ Prep Inventory ❑ ImpIIM CmMn1 ❑ AcclNnl MppN ❑TFR ❑ W-uencu ROPP" ❑ Peome ❑ REPORTING PE RSON❑OF FENDS A OVICTIM❑ D.O.E. EUEINESOADDRESS EUSMESS PHONE HOME ADDRESS I HOME PHONE ICON• £. Nash SEE CASE FILE Warn CI Retem Advised Dept. Assist Message Deliver Citation Imed _ Devil Completed ROLLCALL Treated d Transported G.O.A. I COPv TD CO ATTNr ❑ urr Arrwy ❑ couRr ❑ _cNIFF U orr.eR DISPOSITIONUnswnded Cleared by arrest Rat. otAv Ow -CV InaeDva Olbel OFFICER'S I SUPERVISOR'SSIGNATURE ,numv rwu6t LJCYAA I Nltw l INiIDENT�rn REC'D BY: ORONO POLICE RECORD CHECK REPORT CODE 1 I I I AY: s I. T w v B MESS. KEY CONTROL NUMBER IOCAI CONY. AGENCY NCIC (DENT. ICAGI E C I / --1 / M N 0 2 T 1 1 S 1 0 0 LNBR �r FDATE REPORTED IRPDI TIME PRO ITRPI LOCATION GRIND NOR ILGNI /PUCE COMMITTED (PLCI O LLNBBRR HRD j BADGE N0 SON) TIME ASIG. (TASI O f / O /'It�C/ L1I / TIME ARR (TAR) TIME CLR ITCLI �� /� NRD Coen P.Plnm I11�II' T L� U❑ If NGR ID El / R / / / / A 1 1 —�i�l� In tenon SUPERVISOR APPROVED ENTERED C.J.R.S.❑ V YIPUNM Mail T 011%, Raeorbe By DOB/ AeeraM HPI —NO, Dow 7 - 3— PNeIrNW: W?l-70M7 M 0M1 bn. fua: A4 aAJcw.J stain.. ►- ti T Br6 (ATTACH TELETYPE IF APPLICABLE) AAT CL-14/t. DLBUREAU—li��g$%-BLb DEPT. OF PUBLIC HEALTH - (MENTAL HEALTH - 2962671.830 A.M. to4:30 P.Ml HENNEPIN COUNTY WAR RANTS — (348 20DO or CDC HWA) CAI►4 RAMSEY COUNTY WARRANTS — (2984893 days. 4843366 mONNl e&f4 L NCIC IOW FORMAT) HOMETOWN WARRANTS I / HOMETOWN (ADDRESS& PHONE NO. VERIFIED? V 1 MILITARY — 726-1118 (ONLY IF CHECKS SHOW A POSSIBLE MILITARY RECORDI peuw een+rol Dlrbinn 4' . � I • , I M.qr« pu .11q CMx 9u'.., ur a,. N 1 Mlnn..er. frier+ STATE OFF INNESOTA PUBLIC SA a+n gesa+» DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO ONLY ALLOW CONSUMPTION A DISPLAY OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR IThh Application Shall Be Typewritten and Submitted Before June 1st of each Year) In answering the following quetlioni "APPLICANT" shall be governed a foliovn: For a Partnership, ono of the partner shall execute this application for ail members of the partnership. Fiat is Cotperatlon, one officer shall eaecwe this appliution for NI officer, directors, and stockholders. For a Club, mr of the club officers shall aseauts this appliution for all the members. If additional spec is required, use .,.",are font of paper, indicating by number the question ,.wend. (FEE FOR PERMIT — SaBBaft) EVERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED 1.1. William W. Wear ,as individual owner m .I w ,..even w.u.amn, und..u.. for and in behalf of _ William Wear l MwNr n.mw.1 wn.wr.. nwnop el e,wun. or new m nuel hereby apply for a permit allowing consumption and display of intoxicating liquor to be located at _ 2160 West Wayzata Boulevard , Municipality of Orono Ipnw,.eer.w wet,. L., ... mon ..non Pent Office of Long Lake , County of Hennepin Orono State of Minnesota, in accordance with the provisions of M.S. 340.119. 11.4, ever Surce.n, 2. Will business be operated as a private club or public place public place 3. State type of business mexican restaurant 4. FOR A PUBLIC BUSINESS: If a partnership, state name and address of each member of partnership; if a corporation, state name and address of officers and directors. William W. Wear 36 Hackberry Hill, Long Lake, MN 55356 I N,MI Idd.Ml Mable Wear 36 Hackberry Hill. Long Lake, 11N 55356 N.m.I Iner«.wl 5. FOR A PRIVATE CLUB: Date club win organized is club incorporated number of members , length of time in present location , is club building owned or rented what is the membership dun what are the requirements for membership Does club maintain lockers to be used by members for storing intoxicating liquor Names of all officers and/or directors of the club. I.—, Enclose with this application a copy of the Constitution and By -Laws of the club and current list of bona fide member. 6. If applicant or any partner, corporaLan officer per dirxtor. club officer w director, is not a citizen of the United States, hg Such noncitizens 7. State name of person who will operate or manage business: William W. Wear 36 Hackberry Hill. Long Lake, HN 55356 IName I.,MI B On what now it the establishment located, or to be located first floor 9. How are the Infiniti claesified u..der the inning ordinance h_1 Apprpy.a Im Viol.Novi by DO NOT UK 10. State name and address of owner or owners of building wherein the business will be located: William W. Wear TC uarkherry Hill. Lane Aka- IIH 55366 IN—, IPatlOnl 11. Has applicant; if partnership, any partner; if corporation, any officer or director; if club. any club officer or director, ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked or suspended or been convicted for any violation of State Laws or local ordinances; if so, give date and details 12. Is applicant; if partnership, any partner; if corporation, any officer or director; if club, any club officer or director, a memi of the governing body of the municipality or county in which this permit is to be Issued; if so, in what capacity 13. Has applicant; if partnership, any partner; if corporation, any officer or director; if club, any club officer or director, any interest whatsoever, directly or Indirectly, in any liquor establishment in the State of Minnesota . Give name and address of such establishment 14. Furnish the name and address of at least three business references, including one bank reference State Rank of Inns lake _ __ _ Long _ —. 1964 W. Wayzata Blvd. LonuLake. i1N 55355 (Ni IAddrwr Arlo H. Vance Veote. P.A. 1850 W. Wayzata Blvd, Long Lake till 55356 IM.mp Iseerwrl Kunze Co. 1850 W. Wayzata Blvd, Long Lake. MN 55356 ,.—I uednrrl IS.Will intoxicating liquor be sold on the premises No 16. (a) State whether application is: 1. Original % 2. Rl:newal _ 3. Transfer III) State whether dancing will be permitted on the premises 17. Are the premises now occupied, or to be occupied, entirely separate end exclusive from any other business establishment lie 18. State trade name to be used Mexican atery 19. State whether an "On Sale" or "OffSale" Non -Intoxicating Malt Beverage License has or will be granted in conjunction to this business and for the same premises On -Sale 20. Has there been issued, or will there be issued, a $54.00 Federal Retail Liquor Dealer's Spacial Tax Stamp for the sale of liquor on these premises No 21, Has your local government an ordinance regulating the consumption and display of intoxicating liquor 22. If operating under zoning ordinance how is location of building classified I Iw.ey snN OHN I Nn nN .na rlM.nrMa YNT 41 in In. yprurion. NM rho. IN .nww. e. Nue nt mr n.n 1—I.. I tuninn undenn"d IMI IN Own of NN, iMoriaNNn In Mn dnoiwo.. w In. INin. la EM .wli,,.nl inrn—lkn ro,nnmin uuu rw IN MninninM Nox,nNn N NIN PnRat. IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOO THAT ANY PERMIT ISSUED HEREUNDER DOES NOT ALLOW THE SALE OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR. UMs.d InINnINN 0$IN= Fry.. in W t*w CennN O"._ In '.Nd.d ny M.E. IN,. $n1M 344.111. NO CONSIDERATION WILL BE GIVEN TO THIS APPLICATION UNLESS APPROVED AS HEREINAFTER PROVIDED: If applicant is located in the County, the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners or his Mexican Eatery I N.m..1 En..nmmra 4ie.auu .1 lmnorl(p P.e�iend Representative shall approve both copies of the Subsc�.bIaad� an sworn to before me this — day application. of \1.,a.�� Ic...nn.n. sane.. c.o Ir cemm..nnMn.1 ne NK,w.nvn.n r Ininnnin, eu I . If applicant is located in a Municipality. th�� Commission expires President of the Council or his Representative shall approve both copies of this application. STATE OF MINNESOTA Combination Application for Retailer's (On -Bale) (OH -sale) Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor License To the_ Caway, I, a— ad leeeam •.u.mr I.nevl mm t.nwm national, hereby make apoltoation jor a nemurre (U.. Lianue to all rood, Mail liquor under and pursuant to an of the city, pillage, or State amintoslmtinMalt than) paced 4 city, village tauvel, tantyy beard of and Chapter 340, m1neceota Saltuta 1945, w amended, providing for liawint and regulating 1N note of non-intox4nttng malt Uttar. During the past five years, my reetdenee Ass ban as follow: 36 Hackberry Hill. Long Lake. [-IN 55356 I pap lqp.• 7 31 24 a. 14inneanolis _ sae•• an, I. cw vlM1n Flinnesota Memel, T.• ears we, I am a (native) fnaeaaeatteei; aida n, of the United State. I My (adfoes) (hwhamd'e) name and addras'• Mable Wear, 36 Hackberry Hill, Long Lake, MN 55356 I am proprtetar. of Mexican Eatery llyrn ars, N In the elate of Corporation I, aathortmet to do b"ohm, in Mtnwaal. Liana k far 2160 W Wayzata Blvd. _(stew[) (htgAway) located w fallaoe: The luvnee udn be Ion ooneadion with r cite tranb m,m eve, 4h Ma•.... d,a CM which has been in operation 0 porn• TN The <,t blieh...t it located an the first boor. The bermes premier are owned by William W. Wear The laaw an the property are not delingwnf. I am not engaged In the retail enk of IntaaimNng liquor. I have not h d an applieatian jor Hearses miated as follows I hate never ban oonvlated of a felony nor of t'ialating any Xauaoal or state liquor law ar loeol ordtaanae relating to the manufaet., .1. or tranew,lation, or poenwion far air or troraportation of intoxicating liquor. Gambling or gambling demea will not be permitted on the licensed premteu. I am the awnor of the leasehold, furniture, feturee, and equipment In the premire for which the liana I. applied. ezoopt I ba.a an leleatme or yeamat to trand.r the Ilepea Y malem pe".a I submit tam foilo de, noaw of proax. Meddling a baY, for Marren, Myth Whom I be" iced Inatome nlauou ter [,dome: State Bank of Long Lake 1964 W. We vzh fa Blvd.. Long Lake. DIN 55356 Ar 10 H. Ve, nde Veg te, P.A., 1850 W. Wayzata Blvd., Long Lake, MN 55356 t do not ,and W .."" he the rl. of iawale.tlel tlaa, lid mgl M... Fedeml fbeupeaeal Tax Mcdpt te j�a anti C mpllthe A�l ta'Wiith t Wroylaloeakofl Ee ormn ecni.nni eo tM W lei w odrinb far emldew' parpow and and Myra petrol,. In fun rlea, of the gplh k. I .R.. w wale. mT Conanwtloml Rf fhU V. W march and Miture and will freely permit pace offlem to leaPert ter prom ises and se,a w the forfeiter- of mr Ilona it I. w Wra dolatrd the pn.l.lom d tM ardWaa Im•luual pra,ldina for it. Innth., f thin Ilaenee. I hereby .alemall • ar that the forevin(( ee.amena am tree and eov t to thm bal of as ImeMladve .ad that 1 alyrr to rompI, MN all the pmeidom of the ordleame undo whkh lhi. 11.. 1. Itenaa eab..mre lid ea.n Ia Mon me Ww----- day d JaaAe nam, M lea Yam m� T.••• me fib!! W pal a. :a.:.�—.r.. M_•�er � .u.. rr •4 m„ .Y Yn Otatt of Minnegota, County of_ The undersigned, county attorney and sheriff of said county, hereby recommend the within applt^ cation, it appearing to the best of our knowledge that said applicant has not, within a pr{ad of ftw years prior to the date of this appliootion, violated any taro rel"Ing to the sale of an-intatinattng molt Uquor or intarivating liquor, and that in our judgment the applicant will aomply udth the 1p,os and regulations relating to the eanduct of said Dada's. Dated at Minn., I8__ County Attorney btate of Minnesota, 1 s' COUNTY OF __ J TOWN It L hereby esrtiftAd that the Town Board of the Town said County and 8tob, by resolution on the aY o/ IY_^ did onsent to the 1s'aan s of the lieeno applied for in the within applioation. 19_ TIIB TOWN BOARD OF THB TOWN OF Town Clerk BY— Cho wuxn Note: 'Vo County Boord'hall lesa Moines for sale 14 any Twos Without the Bono" of 04 Torn Board of such Town, and a Town Board 'hall Boas" to the issuance of any liens "thous the writtaw re, ommendation of the County Attorney and the She i/f. 9 E v � G V C cl i z se r a I I V 5ok 4 PMDOUCEN'H THIS CERTNKaTE 41SSIRD IS A MATTER OF INFORMATION OILY RNO CONRM pimt IBP Mum valley view MO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTNKATE MOLDER THIS CERIWICATE DOES NOT YRIq, EAYEND OR ALTER THE COYERAOE AFFORDED SY THE POLKMS ME" -- - - COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE 8200 MiN*BFc Drive alolmlJytm, 10EWImotas 55438 _ MMEIpMr A Trannimparics COMPANY ° OTTER Ompesdes IMSONED .. WaSus1 IMaatloe SEA C 101111W. Ri lMEle J. ISaar 2.160 Wayata Boulevard lJvrl Lake, ICFrEewta 55356 .. LETTISA COMPANY ° COMPANY ` 1ETTER THIN M 10 CERTIFY THAT WLKNS O IMEIMNCE LKTED BELOW "YE SEEN KSUEDTO THE INSURED NAMED ADOYE PON 1H1 POCK• PERgO INDICATED. NOTWITHETAMOING ANY IIEWIREYENT, TEAM OR CONDITION O ANY CONTRACT OR OTI EA DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY K MSUED OR MAY PERTAIN. THE INSUMNCE A,PGRI SIT THE WUCES OESCRIBEO NEREM M SUBJECT TO ALL THE TENS. EICLUM0N6. ARE COCOA,TRANSTRA OF SUCH POIICI[S. CO L1 TYPE OF INSUFIANLE _ POCKY NUMBER no INIONA MN SRLWYR PA. IW WTOI WR SELm'WI 13/1�/gS IIASILITY LIMITS M THOU M FM: OccLYPYI f AGOW" E f A DEMERAL LIATY coPUIENSNE YERS 1f65 95 °MRQF'E"uwrERL"°"B CAPARIIA f S EARS a tauPSE HMAD { FWpICRtaiIEIED OPERATORS INDEPENDENT OOMRUCTUD I. COMBINED $ f DO MAURML INJURY . f ! ry} WpLp IONA PROPERTY CMMCf PERSONNEL MNRY AUTOYOSRE LIAMLJTY- AM' wD N ALP f ALL OJRED wDs M PASS 1 1 ME aMIEDw WPM) MPED wos DRINK NONOAN[D wu5 ca NINNEO s PVAArt LIULm "CRESS W T uMULu FaM MOi NO s f OTHER THEN (ANSI MAN — M.YUIOW g WORKERSCOMPENSATION PRO EMPLorERswnm 0316 00 0g6]77 /S CRNTI Y$JgDARA_LH -FC— lusuM Pan LYITI f3L00.D•J ASE EA:New,mEE OTHER DESCRIPTICN OF CREMTIONMSOCArpNyVEHKLESSPECIK REM5 OeEtlficate gol4Q In Kim the wa tgagm MildFit:ra Life 3100 West Lake Street Him ApIiA, MiavNrwta 55416 Ad'D411I1,uU 1 DdU*0 SHOJLO ANY a THE ADOYC O[SCRyfO WLKYS IN CANRLUIS KIM THE EX PIRAYS DJ'C THEREOF. THE ISSLHNO COMPANY WILL 1M01L10A TO YAII `V DAYS WHITEN NOTICC TO THE MRINKATE ROLC(R WYLD TO THIS LAYI LA SMUT OROR }Ia COMPANY, ITS RESENTS p1�11[PtKMTATPJE�MAI11/fY .": M REHM Ye . Mau ileac ,n ;aQ. •ir!- .—.- . V V'Y� Vu ryO I OICIY I COINCIDEN I I ORONO POLICE RECORD CHECK REPORT REC'D BY. DE AY. E M T W T i 6 MESS. KEY Ej� CO ROL NUMBER IOCAI CONT. AGENCY NCIC IDENT. ICAGI E C I / 1 j� /I M N 10 2 ) 1 1 5 0 0 / LNBR DATE �REEPOORTE�D BIPPD) I TIIME RRPTD (TR�PI LOCATION GRIND NOR ILGNI Ell/ I ' / L LIZILYJ / / PUCE COMMITTED IPLCI / FLNBR NRD SAME NOISONI TIME ASIG ITASI TIME ARA. ITARI TIME CLR. ITCLI NRD m O ❑ / 0 / / II1�II1� / © / I /1 R . RW,o `� /El /� /0 1 1 `l /o / yJ /� IA. in pv SUPERVISOR APPROVED ENTEREOC.J.R.S. ❑ V Vaunt M&MW //�Y T O,w RWnWBY. AACO. r- jQEMJ[&S OUOI BM. Nor. _ CwngNM: INPdMft D R`ipI e AI a I.l O 1. (ATTACH TELETYPE IF APPLICABLEI AAT CA'*-& DLBUREAU )0-,s2o-oyo-s�o-�zo DEPT, OF PUBLIC HEALTH - (MENTAL HEALTH - 2962671.8 30 A.M. W a'30 P.M.) HENNEPIN COUNTY WAR RANTS - 1348 2000 or CDC HWAI / - (298 E893 days, 481 3366 nryMq -� NCIC IOW FORMAT( HOME TOWN WARRANTS HOME TOWN (ADDRESS& PHONE NO. VERIFIED? -! I MILITARY - 726 1148 (ONLY IF CHECKS SHOW A POSSIBLE MILITARY RECORD) Nwn NM D«I aR- oC- 97 nrAE NE.: 2tL —.f39/ L1CeI1Se No. APPLICATION FOR SOLICITATION - $20.00 fee Date Received Date Expires CITY OF ORONO 1335 BROWN ROAD SOUTH BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 Organization: IN ,, ,,'�, �: Phone .':'6 Address: Representatiye: ��nr��.�. , Phone ,,n e Address: + '2 11, Check One: Business Solicitation Contribution Solicitation Number of P.nple Solicitating within the City I — Provide list of Names of Solicitors on back of this application. Type of Product to be solicited PERMIT EXPIRES 60 DAYS FROM APPROVAL DATE. POLICE CHIEF SMALL HAVE FIVE (5) BUSINESS DAYS IN WHICH TO INVESTIGATE AND MARE A REC,'MMENDAT-ON PURSUANT TO ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 5.30 SUED 5(a). ------------------------------------------------------- _----------_-_-__ ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON SOLICITORS Subd. 3. Prohibited Solicitation Practices. A. It is unlawful for any solicitor to engage in solicitation for any unlawful business or o ianizational purpose or activity. B. It is unlawful for any solicitor to practice harassment, nuisance, theft, deceit, or menacing, troublesome or otherwise unlawful activities during the ce'irse of solicitation. C. It is unlawful for any solicitor to enter, or attempt to gain entrance, to residential premises displaying at such entrance a sign with the words "Peddlers and Solicitors Prohibited" or "Solicitors Prohibited". D. It is unlawful for any solicitor to refuse to leave business premises when requested by the owner, lessee, or person in charge thereof. E. It is unlawful for any person to engage in contribution solicitation without completion of licensing or registration as herein provided. P. It is unlawful for any person to engage in business solicitation without a license as herein provided. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The undersigned hereby agrees to the conditions quoted above from the Crono Municipal Code and any additional requirements the City staff may have. Signature of Applicant: Date: ' ------------------------------- .__------------------_-____---------_-_----- FOR CITY USN ONLY: After rev'e- Application, staff recommends the following: Approval of applicatic. Denial of application Signature of City Official: Date: Signature of Police Chief: Date: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name Address• Phone: Czr. License No. Name: Address: r.11 Phor Lid i No. Name: Address. Phone: License NAMES OF SOLICITORS Name: Address: Phone: License No. Name: Address: Phone: License No. Name: Address: Phone: License No. (If additional names, please attach list) To: Orono Council Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator Date: August 19, 1985 Subject: Septic Pumper's License, McCarty Water 6 Waste The applicant is requeuting a "provisional" license to pump septic tanks within the City of Orono. She has not attended the On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshop as required by Code, as she is just starting her own business and the workshops are held once a year in January -March. I have met with the applicant, am impressed with her attitude, and knowledge of pumpout methods and requirements, and I recommend that a pumper's license be issued for 1985, with the wording "renewal of license for 1986 will require completion of normal training requirements". McLJarty Water � Wamsto MR. Michael Gaffron City of Orono 1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Mr. Gaffron: August 19 �1 AUG 19 1985 I am requesting that the City of Orono grant McCarty Water 6 Waste a provisional permit to pump septic tanks within the City Of Orono. Enc- losed is permit bond and certificate of insurance. I am aware that the City of Orono requires septic pumpers to successfully complete the MPCA/ University of Minnesota On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshop. Unfortunately, the course is not offered until January, 1986. I have course materials, and have worked with pumpers who have completed the course and log many years of experience. I support the City of Orono's efforts to assures juality septic tank service and will attend the next scheduled WorkshoF If a provisional permit is granted, I will make every effort to fully comply with the City of Orono's regulations and procedures. McCarty Water 4 Waste's marketing program emphasizes the need for routine septic tank maintenance, which is compatible with the intent of the City of Orono. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If you require any ad- ditional information, please feel free to contact me at 479-4343. will look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, ; &LY-P)1/���� j Mary K. McCarty McCarty Water 6 Waste has a disposal permit through the Metro Waste Control Commission ... .. . .. ..... I .. III I..:... l;l'1 1 cif :►RO NO u r:.tn ns. rr: rl;l LTCENSI, APPLICATION wn,ne: m-usy All questions must be answered. License fee, bond, certificate of insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification or Home Sewage Treat- ment workshop attendance must accompany this application. All appli- cations are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. 1. Business or trade name WAkrcs, "Ste. 2. Business address (gasp �7!/tuai J,;1LA) ,WIePlaiAI, 653.5% 3. Business phone yrpGrelet -y3y3_-Residence phone 0 / -gmN3 4. Name of applicant or company representative holding MPCA certifi- caticnt/44& /�tLltttt� 1. 5. Type of certification held: _Installer _Pumper _Site evaluator _System designer Is this a Provisional Certificate? CERTIFICATE NO. 6. If no Certificate is held, provide evidence of attendance at one of the On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshops held immediately prior 41 to the current construction season.-W.1Jaikf ne(t5a)"JaEW0Wshop 7. Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? n0 Most recent year 8. Have you ever had a license revoked ?,When? Where? SUBMITTALS REQUIRED: 1-'1. $25.00 license application fee. t--2. $2,000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as obligee. The Sta, bets Bond will not be accepted. �- 3. $10-50-100,000 r._. Certificate of Insurance. 1t__ 4. Copy of current MPCA Certificate or evidence of attendance at On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshop held immediately prior to current construction season. LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEm, ARE SUBMITTED. List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license TAe undersigned Iq«bY rate..,Pllcttlon to the City of Giant. mmnetete. for lice." t, install and repeb Septic Syrians, and/or Pw0 out .entic rants. sublact to tM )a•s of the State a ..nna.ou and the Ordinance. of ran City of O,ono. Date - 0 9,)- Applicants signa It"' reeoaaenda Uon A _ � PP,awl: Lnl air eate �, Susan toe Oeu,n 1: City C..n111 1....... E..,. L11'r o.,1 1,r.. �r. on. 1,ctr... , 1.: _ __. _. OFFICE USl: ONLY l )`,* of Ueet at: 1))5 Provn Pned S..1h CITY of ORONO SEPTIC 51'STE47 INSTALLERS .t,u mq Haase..: P. a. u.. id c11.1a1 my, Me 55321 LICENSE APPLICATION Phone:.))-2)5) All questions must be answered. License fee, bond, certificate of insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification or Home Sewage Treat- ment Workshop attendance must accompany `his application. All appli- cations are subject to a tennnl1 �)10) day approval period. 1. Business or trade n . .B'�i��__ �:_ .es_ 2. Business address 7/ 1. O J<_A_C ' � ��� �F" 3. Business phone U 77-$74.#9 Residence phone'f77-3Lr19 4. Name of applicant or company representative holdina MPCA certifi- cation 5. Type of certification held: XInstaller _Pumper _Site evaluator _System designer �/^1 Is this a Provisional Certificate Sit—CERTIFIC�ATTEE NO._�. 6. If no Certificate is held, provide evidenceCof attendar;;,e {o e of the On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshops held immediately prior to the current construction season. 7. Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before?,L4Z Most recent year 1,7 1V B. Have you ever had a license revoked? Y�Whe n?-Where ? I TTALS REQUIRED: $25.00 license application fee. 04- _2. $2.000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted. 3. $10-50-100,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. 04. Copy of current MPCA Certificate or evidence of attendance at j3.�On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshop held immediately prior to current construction season. 8 LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED. List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license The uedQf$iy..d Mreny ..k.. e)plleellon to the City of Omn.. Mlnneeot., for Ile. . a. In. t.II ..4 repair ..plic .Yet..., no pmp -it Septic tenet. subject to the I... of the dtale .f Minnuol. .nd the Ordin.ne.. of the City of teen.. Date- 7- PY- Applicants signature saaff reeo:oene. W.W.- 9 ..... for eenia l: _ City C... eil dcum: wie: dvprorea:_ pniee: Chile lies ".-- OFFICE USE ONLY MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE SCHOOL BOARD c'!% OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278 HELD ON JULY 8, 1985 The annual reorganization meeting of the School Board's! Ord'h/d Ind%yjii�nt School District No. 278 was held on Monday, July 8, 1985. Present: Dave MCKown James Franklin Ja eiter Don Anderson William Levering Will enholt Kitty Crosby Lucie Taylor The meeting was called to order and nominations for chairperson were requested by Mr. Seiter. UPON MOTION by Bill Levering, seconded by Kitty Crosby, Dave MCKown was nomi- nated for chairperson, nominations ceased, and Mr. McKown was elected by unani- mous ballot. UPON NOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Lucie Taylor, Bill Levering was nomi- nated for vice chairperson. Kitty Crosby MOVED, Jim Franklin seconded that nominations cease and Mr. Levering was elected by unanimous ballot. UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Bill Levering, the yearly salary for Clerk was established as 5500 and the yearly salary for Treasurer was established as $100. UPON MOTION by Bill Levering, seconded by Jim Franklin, Kitty Crosby was nomi- nated for Clerk. Lucie Taylor MOVED, Bill Levering seconded that nominations cease and Mrs. Crosby was elected by unanimous ballot. UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Lucie Taylor, Don Anderson was nomi- nated for Treasurer. Jim Franklin MOVED, Kitty Crosby seconded that nominations cease and Mr. Anderson was elected by unanimous ballot. UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, secc,ded by Jim Franklin, the minutes of the April 8, 1985 special meeting were approved as presented. UPON NOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Jim Franklin, the minutes of the April 22, 1985 special meeting were approved as presented. UPON MOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by Kitty Crosby, the minutes of the April 29. 1985 special meeting were approved as presented. UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Bill Levering, the minutes of the June 10, 1985 regular meeting were approved as presented. Bill Levering requested that a presentation be given to the Board to provide further information regarding teacher supervision and evaluation. Mr. Levering stated that he felt the Board should be informed of the process/goals involved in carrying out these evaluations and the work of this committee. Mr. Seiter provided further information to the Board regarding the math/science training program provided through funds from Title II, P.L.98-377. UPON MOTION by Bill Levering, seconded by Kitty Crosby, the consent agenda was approved as follows: 1. Approved the Superintendent's Selection Committee as follows: Don Anderson, Marvel Bongart, Kitty Crosby, Jim Franklin, Dick Kling, Sue Kueppers, Pat Kullberg, Bill Levering, Dave McKown, Don Norris, John Samuelson, Lucie Taylor, Reuben Palm 2. Approved membership in E.C.S.U. for 1985-86. 3. RESOLVED, the School Board, at its meeting on July 8, 1985, did declare its intention to develop projects which expand and improve the educa- tional programs of the district, and said Board did authorize the Superintendent to execute and file application for an in behalf of the school district, and otherwise to act as its authorized representative in state and federally funded programs. 4. Hired Mary Gentes as District TIES secretary. 5. Approved the request of Jennifer Hetchler to attend the Orono Schools. Bob Rego, architect, was present and provided the Board with an explanation of the bid process on the Schumann Elementary roof replacement and answered questions from the Board regarding the project. UPON MOTION by Bill Levering, seconded by Kitty Crosby, the Board accepted the low bid of Les Jones Roofing, Bloomington, for the Schumann roof replacement including the cafeteria roof. Mr. Rego brought the Board up to date on the progress of the remodeling project at the middle school and the high school exterior wall insulation. lie provided explanation on the selection of brick for the middle school project and when a tentative selection has been made, the Board will have an opportunity to look at the sample. The Board asked many questions of Mr. Rego regarding the product being used in the insulation of the exterior wall of the high school. He assured them that it was .a durable product and a good one for use in this par- ticular project. Mr. Rego stated that both of the present projects are progressing very well and according to schedule at this time. Bill Fenholt will provide the Board with a breakdown of the projects that will be deferred and other budgeted funds to be used as a result of the roof project at Schumann Elementary. UPON NOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the regular Board meeting dates for 1985-86, will be held at 7:00 p.m., in the middle school vocal music room as follows: July 8, 1985 November 11, 1985 March 10, 1986 August 12, 1985 December 9, 1985 April 14, 1986 September 9, 1985 January 13, 1986 April 28, 1986 September 23. 1985 January 27, 1986 May 12, 1986 October 14, 1985 February 10, 1986 May 20, 1986 October 28, 1985 February 24, 1986 June 9, 1986 RESOLVED UPON MOTION by Bill Levering, seconded by Kitty Crosby, that the State Bank of Long Lake and the Bank of Maple Plain be and hereby designated as depo- sitories for the regular funds of this school district and the officers of the School Board are hereby authorized in the name of and on behalf of the School Board to open or cause to be opened or to continue or cause to be continued accounts with said banks and to execute and deliver to said banks, signature cards supplied by said banks containing said banks usual customer agreement applicable to such accounts and the signatures of the officers or other persons herinafter named are hereby authorized to act for and on behalf of the School Board or otherwise to endorse or cause to be endorsed, to negotiate or cause to be negotiated, or to deposit or cause to be deposited in such accounts any money, checks, drafts, orders, notes or other instruments payable or held by this School Board. Said officers are: David McKown, Kitty Crosby, Don Anderson. UPON MOTION by Bill Levering, seconded by Kitty Crosby, the following investment depositories were approved and George Stubbs and William Fenholt are authorized to transfer funds among these financial institutions for investment purposes: 1. Marquette Bank 2. Norwest Bank of Minneapolis . 3. First Bank of Minneapolis 4. Midwest Federal Savings and Loan of Minneapolis 5. First Federal Savings and Loan of Wayzata 6. Twin City Federal Savings and Loan 7. Financial Corporation of America 8. State Bank of Long Lake 9 1st Financial Management Corp. 10. Eaton Vance Investors Fund, Inc. 11. Delta Savings 3 Loan, Bolsa, CA 12. Minnesota School District Liquid Asset Fund Plus UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Bill Levering, the LAKER/PIONEER was designated as the official publication of the Orono School District. UPON MOTION by Bill Levering, seconded by Don Anderson, the official office of the clerk of the School Board will be the District Office in the middle school building. UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Bill Levering, John Nolten of the law firm of Faegre and Benson was approved as general legal counsel. UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Bill Levering, Dale Beihoffer of the law firm of Faegre and Benson was approved as legal counsel for labor related needs. UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the auditing firm of Froehling, Anderson, Plowman 6 Egnell, Ltd. as school auditors was approved. UPON MOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the renewal of surety bonds for all employees was approved. UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Lucie Taylor, Kitty Crosby, Jim Franklin and Bill Levering were appointed to serve on the Teachers Meet and Confer committee. UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Bill Levering, Dave McKown was appointed to serve on the Minnesota State High School League committee. UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Jim Fr nklin, Dave McKown was appointed to serve on the TIES committee. UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Bill Levering, Jim Franklin was appointed to serve on the A.M.S.D. committee with Kitty Crosby as alternate. UPON MOTION by Bill Levering, seconded by Lucie Taylor, Don Anderson was appointed to serve on the E.C.S.U. Representative Assembly committee with Jim Franklin as alternate. UPON NOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by Kitty Crosby, Lucie Taylor was appointed as the representative to P.E.R. general assembly with Bill Levering as alternate. UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Bill Levering, Jim Franklin was appointed to serve on the Community Education committee with Bill Levering as alternate. UPON NOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by Bill Levering, Lucie Taylor was appointed to serve as M.S.B.A. Comnet person with Jim Seiter as alternate. UPON NOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by Lucie Taylor, Kitty Crosby was appointed to serve on the Title 1 committee. Jim Franklin MOVED and Lucie Taylor seconded to amend the motion to appoint Don Anderson as alternat-. UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Jim Franklin, Bill Levering was appointed to serve on the Continuing Education committee. UPON NOTION by Bill Levering, seconded by Don Anderson, Kitty Crosby, Bill Levering and Lucie Taylor were appointed to serve on the Negotiating committee. UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Lucie Taylor, Don Anderson and Jim Franklin were appointed to serve on the Parent Meet and Confer committee. UPON MOTION by Lucie Taylor, seconded by Kitty Crosby, the Board accepted the low bid of McBroom Construction for repair/maintenance of the middle school ten- nis courts. Usage of the tennis courts for school programs will be monitored in order to provide backup data when/if further maintenance is required. Bill Fenholt commented on the condition of the high school track according to the engineer and the Board expressed their concerns. Mr. Bob Roscoe, engineer, had examined the present track and he felt that the track base is adequate for resurfacing. As this has been a concern of the Board for some time, Mr. Fenholt said he was pleased to realize that the track problems were not as serious as previously assumed. Mr. Fenholt stated that the problems/maintenance with the track are not due, according to the engineer, to a poor base but that our problems are with the surface. The engineer did not take soil samples berallse he saw no need to do so. UPON NOTION by Bill Levering, seconded by Kitty Crosby, the Board accepted Alternate 1 from the company of McBroom for repair and resurfacing of the high school track. Bill Fenholt provided the Board with information regarding District roof repairs, including the Maple Plain School. Mr. Seiter informed the Board that administration will be working with Hanus Bus Co. to develop guidelines for the bus drivers and meetings will be held semi- annually with the drivers to review these guidelines. Should these guidelines be violated, the Board will have the right to request the removal of that driver. UPON MOTION by Bill Levering, seconded by Don Anderson, the bus transportation contract with Hanus Bus Company for 1985-86 was approved as presented. The negV• ted amounts follow: HANUS BUS Co., INC. 4So0 TONKAwOOD ROAD MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55343 935.)We .tuns 19, 19r5 Yillir peamit Orom lohool District fM 685 1. Old Crystal Day ad Oa000, IN Aar Mr. Fusin it, its following Is our pa0p0a9d pries for school tranaportatim for the 19e5-" sehool years rt 915-W 4g Unto@ 15 I0 .Oo $117.70 $300135.00 Dmysilio loutss 1 ! o'L o o 117.70 20009.00 TO-T"h 1 49 Do 64.90 11033.00 Rode 6 hs-Sohool 5 .26.7> 29.43 25015.50 !din (bvan-"Cr ft 1 1500 16.50 2".00 ly seems) Bond lane (4hr basic) 4 S�r 00 60.50 42350.00 TwanlskLr -be)9.00 3150.00 antra Osrr 1700 has I $.So 17.00 psa hr 28900 v late Activity 816 rms 7529.43 per am 244M 4. go Total 00st 457412.36 sino.a.y, I Fred un" lassos Dos Co., Inc. Bill Fenholt provided the Board with an update regarding teacher negotiations. He stated that ten planning and negotiating meetings have been held and the pro- cess is just beginning. Mr. Fenholt stated that he has not met with the secre- taries as yet but will do so in the near future and report back to the Board commit tee. UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Jim Franklin, milk bids are to be secured for the 1985-86 school year. UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Jim Franklin, the bills as covered by vouchers 048507 through 048532 and 047815 through 048033 (048034 through 048037 held for 1984-85 vouchers) and 048038 through 048083 were approved as presented. UPON MOTION by Lucie Taylor, seconded by Jim Franklin, the meeting was recessed at 8:10, it was reconvened at 9:DO p.m. A presentation was given by Dr. Clifford Hooker and Dr. van Mueller of the Departunent of F cation Policy and Administration, University of Minnesota, expla'ning their :onsultant services in regard to the District's search for a superintendent. Discussion was held but no action was Laken. UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Bill Levering, the meeting was adjourned. c Katherine F. Crosby, Lierk Approved: Dave MCKown, chairman NOERENBERG MEMORIAL COUNTY PARK CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE METING August 5, 1985 4:00 p.m. Freshwater Biological Institute ONoao 10---- 'r-- j691 ��61 ZsI WN I�E Members Present: Richard Gray, Chairw Jo Ellen Ilurr Ann Doerr Bob Kujetin n Dorthea Fish Bob Mrgaas c "� J. Diann Goetten Barb Peterson Mike Heger George Rector O ^' r- s os 0, O � , rrry, Members Absent: Mickey Goldman Toni Riley O Barb Kaerwer Hank Sere Glen Ray Others Present: Bill Boynton Jeb Bar Ray Forde Don King Arla lindberg Fbrty & -en Bo .. -klund Dick Gray called the meeti.ig r at 4:00 p.m. Deb Bar As reviewed the site ;' n mplementing the concept of the Estate Gardens of Lak tiinnetonka. She .iewed the drawing indicating location of the Visitor r iru*hei - stems, garden features, parking lot, entrance gate and of ian. Questiom < ng how much of the existing garden layout would be retained :.de Bartels explained that most of the beds were being re, r r ... nged 'n shape. It is important, given the location of access to + a,:J the visitor Center. that the gardens be orientated ir. manner rompatiu., w -h the building, as i , hau Previously been orientated with th house. As a result the garden plan has essentially a three axis viewing of the garden, one from the Visitcr Center, one front the gazebo, and one from the e. mo r'al arbor. The Question was raised regardieg '.he size and style of the memorial arbor on the site of the former house. Bartels explained that the arbor being proposed now was considerably larger than that currently in place. It is essential' a double wall arbor opr-. to viewing through it. It is on the location of the former home and while it appears somewhat larger it will •^• dominate the site because the space available is considerably lar-or tAn rLor. The 'ommi- ee stressed its desire to have it ^hor , 1 ze sc the pillars and posts salvaged from the house *-an . .: razed so as t, Int.iri an architectural styl cd,,sis.ent .ith the house that existed there previously. NMLP Advisory Committee Meeting - 2 - August 5, 1985 Don King distributed revised cost estimates for the development of the garden plan. The estimstes are organized into three segments; the first dealing with the basic supp,,rt services discr,sed in the report adopted by the Committee on March 14, 1985, the second being additional features that would make the garden more usable by the public, and the third being additional features that would complete the development of the garden as indicated on the plan. Total construction cost is estimated to be t8P5,000. (Copy of the cost estimate is attached.) Gray suggested that inasmuch as only about $200,000 was available immediately. The Committee should prioritize those items on the cost estimate list. The Committee agreed on the following priorities: Memorial Arbor S 25,000 Plantings (East Side of Property) 25,000 Parking Le 45,000 Utilities 30,000 Water Distribution System t 75,000 TOTAL •np, The Committee agreed that additional funds available would then be spent on the other priority items listed on the cost estimate with the first being the completion of the water distribution system as called for in the plan. Discussion emphasized that some of the brick pathways would be constructed as par: of th. garden is being developed, so that each component of development would be coralete. Heger indicated it is important to use quality materials and construction rather than being partially completed and thus inconveniencing the park user until additional construction occurs. The L..,mmittee discussed the amount of fund ra- ing that would be required to develop the park. The Committee suggested :he District spend the halance of investment earnings, above those necessary support annual opei„cions, to phase in the improvements outlined in thL cost estimates, additional funds (private contributions nr public funds) could be used to s.pplement this money. The cur sus of the Committee was to _ . •e the plan as presented and to recor - that the District approach this on a phased year development sche; Funds for constructir, sl,uld come from the Trust Fund in excess of $1.2 million and investment earnings 'i excess of thou ;•:1red to operate on annual basis, plus f .ds available irum other source: Chairman Gray commended the District staff on V work with the Committee in this process and thanked them for tneir cooperat.on. Chairman Gray also thanked all the am -+hers of the Committee for their time and interest in this project. Tti� meeting adjorned at 5:55 p.m. 01?5A UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA I Depannenl o1 police TWIN CITIES 2030 Universityy Avenue S E. Mmneapolls. Mnnesol0 55414 1 (612) 373 3550 Avgtvt 14, 1985 Chief Melvin Kilbo Orono Police Department 445 Willow Drive Long Lake, Minnesota Dear Chief Kilbo, AUG 2 G 11985 CITY OF MONO I wish to thank you and your department for the very profeAsional assistance provided at the University of Minnesota Board of Regents meeting August 9, 1985, at the Gray Freshwater Biological Institute. Your coopera- tion was very much appreciated by the department and the University of Minnesota. Assistant Chief Bermiester, Mark Fritzleu and Mark Thomton were assigned to the meeting. These officers contributed in a very professional manner in a difficult situation. Their presence and actions allowed the meeting to continue to a successful conclusion. I personally want to commend them for the fessional conduct during the entire affair. This ea ^nce was probably new to them, but they handled eves Aspect of it extremely well during the unpleasant conf>font; in. C � again, "Thank you." If we can be of any assistance, p—ase call. Sincerely, 7 William A. House Acting Chief of Police WAN/- cc: 2anda: AUG28'�_:.c TO: ORONO CITY COUNCIL FROM: JoEllen Hurt CITY OF UhJh,. DATE: August 23, 1995 ITEM: LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT APPOINTMENT I an interested in being reappointed to the LMCD for another three year term. I am currently on the Executive Committee and also a member of both subcommittees. My attendance record at an avera — of four meeting per month is excellent. I chaired the fee cr,s,mittee that reallocated the costs of the LMCD operation and in curm reduced the charge to the City of Orono by several thousand dollars. The LMCD has many challenges in the next few years and I feel that my background and experien-e on the board for the last four years will assist me as an effective representative of the Lake end the City of Orono. I will be happy to Aiscuss this issue with you on Monday the 26th of August, or call me at home with any questions. Planning Commission PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) �3. awl- -j)Ft Avm ot.�-LAku- h,rr- M2 ���12 any ris s {1ryMMry �• + P o 5. a 4# tir- 4WC Q �7. E. 0. 2. C y2 Ir, i v ±Pup' it 9 r 7 i 'UP. COe- 'O Qk� t 4. r 5. 6. 7. 0. 9. 0. nfo r in d,+ I OfX IE +e.,otv% s Comn cli I (At" ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE: PROVIDING FOR IT'S ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT: REGULATING THE ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, ENLARGEMENT, ALTERATION, REPAIR, MOVING, REMOVAL, DEMOLITION, CONVERSION, OCCUPANCY, EQUIPMENT, USE, HEIGHT, AREA AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL BUILDINGS AND/OR STRUCTURES IN THE CITY OF ORONO; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND COLLECTION OF FEES THEREFORE; PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF: ORDINANCE NO. 12 OF THE CITY OF ORONO AND ALL OTHER ORDINANCES AND PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT THEREWITH. The City Council of the City of Orono does ordain as follows: Section 1 - Section 12.01 0£ the municipal Code of Orono is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 1. Building Code. The Mint •sota State Building Code, estabrls�ied pursuant to Mn. Stats. 16B.60 through 168.73, one copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk is hereby adopted as the building code for the City of Orono. Such code is hereby incorporated in this ordinance as completely as if set out in full. A. The 1985 Edition of the State Building Code Minnesota Rules Chapters 1300, 1305, 1310, 1315, 1320, 1330, 1335, 1340, 1355, 1360 and 1365 effective 1/14/85 adopts by reference the following codes. (1.) 1982 Edition of the Uniform Building Code, identified as "UBC"; (2.) 1984 Edition of the National Electrical Code, identified as "NEC"; (3.) 1981 American National Standard Safety Co9e for Elevators, Dumbwaiters, Escalators and Moving Walks, identified as ANSI A17.1 - 1981, and Supplement, ANSI A17.la - 1982. (4.) Minnesota Plumbing Code, Minnesota Rules Chapter 4715.9190 - .3160 and 4715.5000 - .6000. (5.) Flood Proofing Regulations, June 1972, Office of the Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army. (6.) Minnesota Heating, Ventilating, Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Code, Minnesota Rules Chapter 1345. 17.) Rules for Energy Conservation Alternatives in Construction Minnesota Rules Chapter 4215 adopts ".y reference the 1983 CABO Model Energy Code. 1 (8.) State of Minnesota Manufactured (Mobile) Home Rules, identified as Minnesota Rules Chapter 1350. (July 31, 1983) (9.) Standards of Performance for Solar Energy Systems and Subsystems Applied to Energy Needs of Buildings, 1977 Edition, identified as Minnesota Rules Chapter 1325. a. Mandatory Appendices. In additon to those items listed above, the following Appendices, Standards and Supplemental Materials referenced in the Co.3e are hereby adopted by reference as part of the Building Code in the City of Orono and incoporated into this ordinance as completely as if set out in full. (1.) Minnesota state Building Code, Technical Requirements for Fallout Shelters, Minnesota Rules Chapter 1330. (2.) Minnesota State Building Code, Variations in Snow Loads, Minnesota Rules Chapter 1365. (3.) 1982 Uniform Building Code Appendix Chapter 35. (4.) Minnesota Plumbing Code, Minnesota Rules 4715.3900 - 4715.4100. C. Optional Appendices. The followwng Appendices, Standards and Supplemental Materials are not a mandatory part of the Code but are adopted by reference for the City of Orono and are incorporat without change, into this ordinance as completely as if out in full. (1.) Minnesota State Building Code, Abbreviations and address of Technical Organizations, Minnesota Rules 1390.2000. (2.) 1982 UBC Appendix, Chapters 1, 7, 32 ...... 55. (3.) Minnesota Plumbing Code, Minnesota Pules 4715.3560 - 47' .1800. (4.) Minnesota State Building Code, Appendix E Automatic Fire Suppression Systems, Minnesota Rules 1300.1150. Secti 1 2. Effective Date of Ordinance. The effective date of this Ordinance is upon publication. By ------------------- ------ Mayo[ Attest- er-------------------- 2 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE: PROVIDING FOR IT'S ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT: REGULATING THE ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, ENLARGEMENT, ALTERATION, REPAIR, MOVING, REMOVAI., DEMOLITION, CONVERSION, OCCUPANCY, EQUIPMENT, USE, HEIGHT, AREA AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL BUILDINGS AND/OR STRUCTURES IN THE CITY OF ORONO; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND COLLECTION OF FEES THEREFORE; PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF: ORDINANCE NO. 12 OF THE CITY OF ORONO AND ALL OTHER ORDINANCES AND PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN C^NFLICT THEREWITH. The City Council of the City of Orono does ordain as follows: Section 1 - Section 12.01 of the municipal Code of Orono is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 1. Building Code. The Minnesota State Building Code, e sta�iTs�i ed pursuant to Mn. Stats. 16B.60 throuqh 168,73, one copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk is hereby adopted as the building code for the City of Orono. Such code is hereby incorporated in this ordinance as completely as if set out in full. A. The 1985 Edition of the State Building Code Minnesota Ruler 'hapters 1300, 1305, 1310, 1315, 1320, 1330, 1335, 1340, ;i55, 1360 and 1365 effective 1/14/85 adopts by reference the following nodes. (1.) 1982 Edit?on of the Uniform Building Code, identified as "UBC"; (2.) 1984 Edition of the National Electrical Code, identified as "NEC"; (3.) 1981 American National Standard Safety Cc is for Elevators, Dumbwa;ters, Escalators and Moving "alks, identified as ANSI A17.1 - 1981 and Supplement, ANSI A17.la - 1982. (4.) Minnesota Plumbing Code, Minnesota Rules Chapter 4715.0100 - .3160 and 4715.5000 - .6000. (5.) Flood Proofing Regulations, June 1972, Office of the Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army. (6.) Minnesota Heating, Ventilating, Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Code, Minnesota Rules Chapter 1345. (7.) Rules for Energy Conservation Alternatives in Construction Minnesota Rules Chapter 4215 adopts by reference the 1983 CABO Model Energy Code. l (S.) St. nnesota Manufactured (Mobile) Home Rules, i ,d as Minnesota Rules Chapter 1350. (July 31, i. (9.) Standards if Performance for Solar Energy Systems and Subsystems Applied to Energy Nerls of Buildings, 1977 Edition, identified as Minnesota Rules Chapter 1325. e. Mandatory Appendices. In additon to those items listed above, the following Appendices, Standards and Supplemental Materials referenced in the Code are hereby adopted by reference as pact o£ the Building Code in the City of Orono and incoporated into tliis ordinance as completely as if set out in full. (1.) Minnesota State Building Code, Technical Requirements for Fallout Shelters, Minnesota Rules Chapter 1330. (2.) Minnesota State Building Code, Variations in Snow Loads, Minnesota Rules Chapter 1365. (3.) 1982 Uniform Building Code Appendix Chapter 35. (4.) Minnesota Plumbing Code, Minnesota Rules 4715.3900 - 4715.4100. C. Optional Appendices. The folloiwng Appendices, Standards and Supplemental Materials are not a mandatory part of the Code but are adopted by reference for the City of Orono and are incorporated, without change, into this ordinance as completely as if set out in full. (1.) Minnesota State Bui ldin.i Code, Abbreviations and address of Technical Organizations, Minnesota Rules 1300.2000. (2.) 1982 UBC Appendix, Chapters 1, 71 32 and 55, (3.) Minne -, Plumbing Code, Minnesota Rules 4715.3509 - 4715.380'. (4.) Minnesota State Building Code, Appendix E Automatic Fire Suppression Systems, Minnesota Rules 1302.1150. 'action 2. Effective Date of Ordinance. The effective date of ioio Ordinance is upon publication. By ----- — Attest: T ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE: PROVIDING FOR IT'S ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT: REGULATING THE ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, ENLARGEMENT, ALTERAr10N, REPAIR, MOVING, REMOVAL, DEMOLITION, CONVERSION, OCCUPANCY, EQUIPMENT, USE, HEIGHT, AREA AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL BUILDINGS AND/OR STRUCTURES IN THE CITY OF ORONO; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND COLLECTION OF FEES THEREFORE; PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF: ORDINANCE NO. 12 OF THE CITY OF ORONO AND ALL OTHER ORDINANCES AND PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT THEREWITH. 'he City Council of the City of Orono does ordain as follows: Section 1 - Section 12.01 of the municipal Code of Orono is her,nby amended as follows: Subd. 1. Building Code. The Minnesota State Building Code, estate she pursuant to Mo. Stars. 168.60 through 168.73; one copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk is hereby adopted as the building code for the City of Orono. Such co-i- is hereby incorporated in this ordinance as completely as if set out in full. A. The 1985 Edition of the State Building Code Minnesota Rules Chapters 1300, 1305, 1310, 1315, 1320, 1330, 1335, 1340, 1355, 1360 and 1365 effective 1/14/85 adopts by reference the following codes. (1.) 1982 Edition of the Uniform Building Coie, identified as "UBC"; (2.) 1984 Edition of the National Electrical Code, identified as (�.) 1981 Ameri, National Standard Safety Code for Elevators, ^umbwaiters, Escalators and Moving Walks, identified as ANSI 417.1 - 1981 and Supplement, ANSI A17.la - 1982. (4.) Minnesota Plumbing Code, Minnesota Rules Chapter 4715.0100 - .3160 and 4715.5000 - .6000 (5.) Flood Proofing Regulations, June 1972, Office of the Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army. (6.) Minnesota Heating, Ven'ilating, Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Code, Minnesota Rules Chapter 1345. (7.) Rules 1Jr Energy Conservation Alternatives in construction Minnesota Rules Chapter 4215 adopts by reference the 1983 CABO Model Energy Code. (8.) State of Minnesota Manufactured (Mobile) Home Rule identified as Minnesota Rules Chapter 1350. (July 31, 1983) (9.) Standards of Performance for Solar Energy Systems and Subsystems Applied to Energy Needs of Buildings, 1977 Edition, identified as Minnesota Rules Chapter 1325. B. Mandatory Appendices. In additon to those items listed a'. e, the following Appendices, Standards and Supplemental Ma :vials referenced in the Code are hereby adopted by reference as part of the By ding Code in the City of Orono and incoporated into this ordine-. a as completely as if set our. in full. 1.) Minnesota State Building Cnie, Technical equirements for Fallout Shelters, nnesota Rules 'hapter 1330. (2.) Minnesota State Euilding Code, Variations Snow Loads, Minnesota Rules chapter 1365. (3.) 1982 Uniform Building Code Appendix Chapter 35. (4.) Minnesnta Plumbing Code, Minnesota Rules 4715.3900 - 4715.4100. C. Optional Appendices. The follo i Appendices, Standards and Supplemental Materials are not a-..datory part of the Code but are adopted by reference for the -'ity of Orono and are incorporated, without change, intn this ordinance as completely if aet out in full. (1.) Minnesotd State Building Code, Abbrevirtio,:v and address of Technical Organizations, Minnesota Y.le- '100.2000. ) 1982 UUr' Annendie, Chapters 1, 7, 32 and j5. (3.) meri:ta Plu,.,_.ng Code, /innesota Rule 1. '7i5.3500 - 015.3800. {i.) Minnesota State Ldilding Code, Appendix E tomatic Fire Suppression Systems, Minnesota Rules 1300.1159. Section 2. rffective Date of Ordit. r.ce. The effective date of this Ordinance is upon pub:ication. By _ Mayor Attes.- ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE: PROVIDING FOR IT'S ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT: REGULATING THE ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, ENLARGEMENT, ALTERATION, REPAIR, MOVING, REMOVAL, DEMOLITION, CONVERSION, OCCUPANCY, EQUIPMENT, USE, HEIGHT, AREA AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL BUILDINGS AND/OR STRUCTURES IN THE CITY OF ORONO; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND COLLECTION OF FEES THEREFORE; PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF: ORDINANCE NO. 12 OF THE CITY OF ORONO AND ALL OTHER ORDINANCES AND PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT THEREWITH. The City Council of the City of Orono does ordain as follows: Section 1 - Section 12.01 of the municipal Code of Orono is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 1. Building Code. The Minnesota State Building Code, established pursuant to Mn. Stats. 16B.60 through 16B.73, one copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk is hereby adopted as the building code for the City of Orr^o. Such code i hereby incorporated in this ordinance as completely as if set ou .n fu 1 1. A. The 1985 Edition of the State Building Code Minnesota Rules Chapters 1300, 1305, 1310, 1315, 1320, 1330, 1335, 1340, 1355, 1360 and 1365 effective 1/14/85 adopts by reference the following codes. (1.) 1982 Edition of the Uniform Building Code, identified as "UBC"; (2.) 1984 Edition of the National Electrical Code, identified as "NEC"; (3.) 1981 American National Standard Safety Code for Elevators, Dumbwaiters, Escalators and Moving Walks, identified as ANSI A17.1 - 1981 and Supplement, ANSI A17.la - 1982. (4.) Minnesota Plumbing Code, Minnesota Rules Chapter 4715.0100 - .316N and 4715.5000 - .6000. (5.) Flood Proofing Regulations, June 1972, Office of the Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army. (6.) Minnesota Heating, Ventilating, Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Code, Minnesota Rules Chapter 1345. (7.) Rules for Energy Conservation Alternatives in Construction Minnesota Rules Chapter 4215 adopts by reference the 1983 CABO Model Energy Code. (8.) State of Minnesota Manufactured (Mobile) Home Rules, identified as Minnesota Rules Chapter 1350. (July 31, 1983) (9.) Standards of Performance for Solar Energy Systems and Subsystems Applied to Energy Needs of Buildings, 1977 Edition, identified as Minnesota Rules Chapter 1325. B. Mandatory Appendices. In additon to those items listed above, the following Appendices, Standards and Supplemental Materials referenced in the Code are hereby adopted by reference as part of the Building Code in the City of Orono and incoporated into this ordinance as completely as if set out in full. (1.) Minnesota State Building Code, Technical Requirements for Fallout Shelters, Minnesota Rules Chapter 1330. (2.) Minnesota State Building Code, Variations in Snow Loads, Minnesota Rules Chapter 1365. (3.) 1982 Uniform Building Code Appendix Chapter 35. (4.) Minnesota Plumbing Code, Minnesota Rules 4715.3900 - 4715.4100. C. Optional Appendices. The folloiwng Appendices, Standards and Supplemental Materials are not a mandatory part of tite Code but are adopted by reference for the City of Orono and are incorporated, without change, into this ordinance as completely as if set out in full. (I.) Minnesota State Building Code, Abbreviations and address of Technical Organizations, Minnesota Rules 1300.2000. (2.) 1982 UBC Appendix, ^_hapters 1, 7, 32 and 55. (3.) Minnesota Plumbing Code, Minnesota Rules 4715.3500 - 4715.3800. (4.) Minnesota State Building Code, Appendix E Automatic [sire Suppression Systems, Minnesota Rules 1300.1150. Section 2. Effective Date of Ordinance. The effective dat? of this Ordinance is upon publication. By-- ----- Mayor Attest: 2 Cite of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF LETTER OP INTENT AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a duly constitued municipality under Chapter 412 Minnesota Statutes with its own police department; and WHEREAS, the County of Hennepin is a duly constitued county under Chapter 873 and provides law enforcement services in accordance with Minnesota Statutes; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono has need on a temporary basis for one patrol officer not to exceed four (4) months starting 1, September 1985; and WHEREAS, the County of Hennepin is able to supply such a qualified officer under a joint powers arrangement as provided for in Minnesota Statute 436.05 under the conditions outlined in attachment of the letter of intent dated August 22, 1985; and WHEREAS, the letter of intent provides the basis for initiating su_h services. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Counci 1 of the City of Orono that it desires such services under the terms outlined in the letter of intent dated August 22, 1985, and hereby resolves to enter into the needed joint powers agreement under these terms and, FURTHER RESOLVED, that its Administrator and Police Chief may jointly execut,2 the appropriate letter of intent and joint powers agreement. in 1 ine with the conditions of the letter of intent. Adopted by the Orono City Counci 1 on this 2Eth day of August, 1985. ATTEST: Macy C. Butler, Mayor------- fior©t"Fy -cTe—rm --- - -- City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORISIF-.a EXECUTION OF LETTER OF INTENT AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a dily constitued municipality under Chapter 412 Minnesota Statutes with its own police department; and WHEREAS, the County of Hennepin is a duly constitued county under Chapter 873 and provides law enfGrcc:.nent services in accordance with Minnesota Statutes; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono has need a temporary basis for one patrol officer not to exceed four (a, months starting 1, September 1985; and WHEREAS, the County of Hennepin is able to supply such a qualified officer under a joint powers arrangement as provided for in Minnesota Statute 436.05 under the conditions outlined in attachment of the letter of intent dated August 22, 1985; and WHEREAS, the letter of intent provides the basis for initiating such services. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono that it desires such services under the terms outlined in the letter of intent dated August 22, 1985, and hereby resolves to enter into the needed joint powers agreement under these terms and, FURTHER RESOLVED, that its Administrator and Police Chief may jointly execute the appropriate letter of intent and joint powers agreement in line with the conditions of the letter of intent. Adopted by the Orono City Counci 1 on this 26th day of Au(lust, 1985. Mary C. F3utier, Mayur ATTEST: U-0rothy-M—.-1 T-TTn; --riiy-C'Ter-V-- 0 City, of OR(_)N() RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF LETTER OF INTENT AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a duly constitued municipality unO..er Chapter 412 Minnesota Statutes with its own police departm;.;t; and WHEREAS, the County of Hennepin is a duly constitued county under Chapter 873 and provides law enforcement services in accordance with Minnesota Statutes; and WHEREAS, the City of Oronc has need on a temporary basis for one patrol officer not to exceed four (4) months starting 1, September 1985; and WHEREAS, the County of Hennepin is able to supply such a qualified officer under a joint powers arrangement as provided for in Minnesota Statute 436.05 under the conditions outlined in attachment of the letter of intent dated August 22, 1985; and WHEREAS, the letter of intent provides the basis for initiating such services. NOW, THEREFORE 86 IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono that it desires such services under the terms outlined in the letter of intent dated August 22, 1985, and hereby resolves to Enter into the needed joint powers agreement under these terms and, FURTHER RESOLVED, that its Administrator and Police Chief may jointly execute the appropriate letter of intent and Joint powers agreement in line with the conditions of the letter of intent. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 26th day of August, 1985. Mary C. Butler, Mayor ATTEST: rlocothy-Mi: �aTTin;-�'►Ty-Cwe -- -- City Of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORI%ING EXECUTION OF LETTER OF INTENT AND JOINT a-rMERS AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a duly constitued municipality under Chapter 412 Minnesota Statutes with is own police dep.irtme,it; and i!kgRZAS, the County of Hennep. n is a dt.ly constitued county under Chapter 873 and provides law enforcement services n accordarce with Minnesota Statutes; and WHEREAS, the City of Oronc has noed on a temporary basis for one patrol office; not to exceed four (4) months starting 1, September 1985; a,id WHEREAS, the County of Hennepin is able to supply such a qualified officer ender a joint powers arrangement as provided for in Minne:�ota Statute 436.05 under the conditions outlined in attachment of the letter of intent dated August 22, 1985; and WHEREAS, the letter of intent provides the basis for initiating such services. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono th.it it desires such services •ander the term% outlined in the l,.�t ter of intent Jated August 22, 1985, aid hereby resolves to enter into the needed joint powers agreem-rit under these terms an-i, FURTHER RESOLVED, that its Administrator and Police Chief may jointly execute the appropriate letter of intent and joint powers agreement in line with the conditions of the letter of intent. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 26th day of Au'lust, 1985. M :, r y C Butter, Mayor_-- A,r,rF:ST: ��o�oti�Y �t: RaiTin, _c'Cfy "C1"rrT___'_ - �6 �coNSTtvcTlcr LI►'11tt, V)/ =. a L I IJ t maw��_���������������r����ww�w.���w������������������ ������������ -----������������������������������������w L—�-----,J�IJti�5 Ohl CJI La1G. Fi1.D p 2'-o"i2'-p" aS'-dJKa•+ ��•iE¢ED , RvIJ REFRICaE2v.r1T LIrJ ESA-- �� =Rc51J SIR Ir�1TeKE 2clGJ C*ZaDc To cR Wll- + �� t2r4vt ELF CL I M4DbC^ ' TvH V-S y uGT bElo►i C34k&DE \`Low r - ^ - - - 4.1 t IQDICATLS LII.+E � I a � FoiJ�R� ion: io a 2craFs � Ev5T. l•1ELl - 4EJI5E EfibT. pUMP - r� ,� P:PirJG 'e� I.i.to1•J ^/rTVESS" �,;r�P _ �• lie, p. IeJtTo1LA'ibrJ. FINIgN F-USN Nv/ G2AvF- 1 ci- % r' 145U-. COPPER ; 44 LO✓fa ' I p-j5 Iw 0Vge CVGK ALL ti J'� GPZAt�L 4gC-ovI- l j I !! 9PNIThR( SEuEP hNG ae INV. II NV 932 c If�JttQFl7 1��� ( N%1T�� MPIN �IPINb R ' �� 93� C= 36. v.-- 1 !� � v.iITH 'Z `I i NON P: (�P►T�D _ �/ 1� SM T'' 9 5j �Fc^ HrAT �,k?- P� S AND CGYGi( ,�/ 1'ARN'/i FLU %• 1yP0 Ey �pf�YWE•L.L® � _. I ,K:1.�..- � "� G �,rj�20 LF g PW i 0 I PAV�� a r-6-N=fPjr- l'pr�t`I COI; r ac i • b � v"THIGH- cveh 5U6C etTr-p 6!5 LINE WC?j cr1 1` o G O nuc tic w No(lTt+ `�C. �'L FoF SEtJl,GE E.�EcTolz I �� ^ITN ;Le� 1 LZ4fTi01'l 5o is �� r.. � � � ^\ ��24•Lee � � O n 1 not AC i-rz2 // rY [e1 j UR, " Pewer Pek Po Der Po% T GoiiiiLol f,Sec. 7, aR Y �Fe AC I9. IR 14 lee -1 - 9G5. Keu-(v0/1"rlpp/e -F p- ple r•ararr siruiF -� 0 fe 927 Ftnce r ,30 40 N t/ 0 ` � ` `�` _�an'�• a od�`"' IROH / � . �..,. Top o- - i�� 6 I = `t u 16 and 18 of Orono, ^)w vacated, together with all vacated avenues, lexcept Brackett hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of`fhe.bol ible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. ignated in the plat of Orono, now vacated, as Public Reserve which lies Southerly of pd this 23rd day of November, 1976. #henry Nnrfh d !IPnrppB; 15 minutes East. 323.7 feet to a point on the East line of t P ! i+4 •R