Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-10-1985 Council PacketMINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 10, 1985 PAGE 1 ATTENDANCE 7:00 PM The Orono Council meeting met on the above date with the following members present: Acting Mayor Frahm, Council- membersGrabek, Lynn Adams, and Tim Adams. Mayor But'ar was absent. The following represented City staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson, Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron, Deputy Clerk Lattin, and City Recorder Sutton. City Attorney Radic was also present. City Engineer Cook was not present, but Mike Lynch, from Bonestroo & Associates, was present. RESOLUTION #1772 AWARD SALE OF BONDS Carolyn Drude, Ehlers & Associates, was present. City Administrator Bernhardson stated that Carolyn Drude has indicated that the City of Orono's bond rating has risen from A-1 to AA rating. Bernhardson stated that the highest bid for the interest rates was 8.1051% and the lowest bid was for 7.9156%. Bernhardson stated that staff recommends that the City contract with the lowest bidder at 7.9156%. Councilmember Grabek moved, Councilmember T. Adams seconded, to adopt Resolution #1772, A Resolution awarjing sale of $900,000 general obligation improvement bonds of 1985 to Miller Securities Inc. and Payne Webber, fixing the form and specifications thereof, providing for their execution and delivery and levying taxes for their payment at an interest rate of 7.9156%. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). Carolyn Drude, Ehlers & Associates, recommended that the City appoint the First National Bank to be the paying registrar. Councilmember T. Adams moved, Acting Mayor Frahm seconded, to appoint the First National Bank as the paying registrar. Motior, Ayes (4), Nays (0). PUBLIC HEARING ART CENTER OF MN SEWER PROJECT EXTENSION 65-2 7:06-7:39 p.m. Acting Mayor Frahm called for the public hearing at 7:06 p.m. concerning the proposed sewer project extension for the Art Center of MN. City Recorder Sutton noted the affidavit of publication and the certificate of mailing. Those in attendance for this public hearing signed attendance sheets which are attached to these minutes. Toni Richardson, representative of the Art Center, was also present. City Administrator Bernhardson noted that the City is required by law to publish the public hearing notice twice and that is the reason for the second convening of the public MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 10, 1985 PAGE hearing. Bernhardson noted the appraisal of the Art Center which was submitted tonight for the Council's review. Bernhardson noted that the appraisal indicates that the Art Center's valuation would only increase $35,000 with the sewer. Bernhardson stated that after an on -site inspection the MWCC has reduced the number of SAC units from 22 to 13. Bernhardson stated that the MWCC will be submitting a letter verifying the 13 SAC units for the Art Center. Bernhardson explained that staff is still recommending 10 units to be assigned to the Art Center. Bernhardson stated that if the City were to assign 10 units, the total assessment for the Art Center would be $94,300. Toni Richardson, Art Center of representative, reentered into the record a letter dated May 24, 1985, from the Art Center regarding the proposed sewer extension. Such letter is attached to these minutes. Terry Morse of 2080 Spates Avenue asked why the Art Center is only being assessed 10 units when the Orono High School was assessed 169 sewer units. Morse pointed out that the Art Center could sell the operation and a new commercial use could use the building to its potential. Toni Richardson, Art Center of representative, state? that the current septic system is designed for 1,800 gallon capacity which wus originally designed for 800 students. Richardson noted that the current student enrollment has not exceeded 479 and has declined for years. Richardson noted that if the property was sold, the new owners would have to apply for a conditional use permit and that the conditional use permit is the means for the City to keep control on the size of the use at the Art Center. LaDean McWilliams of 1130 Willow Drive South noted that drain pipes extend from the pottery room part of the Art Center and runs onto the open ground. McWilliams stated that there is white looking material coming from the pipe. Staff noted they would investigate the matter. Councilmember T. Adams stated that he has a hard time considering the additional two units added for future expansion of the Ait Center. Adams asked if the City has assessed additional units for future expansion for commercial uses in other sewer projects. Gary Printup of 1261 Briar Street reminded the Council of a recent service station in Navarre that was charged the same number of SAC and sewer units. Printup asked how the payment of those charges go into the project since the sewer project had already been through the area. Public Works Gerhardson stated that if a commercial use changes and that: change increase SAC units, the additional SAC units are charged as well as the assessments. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING 11FLD JUNF 10, 1985 PAGE 3 Acting Mayor Frahm closed the public hearing at 7:39 p.m. Councilmember Grabek felt that the appropriate number of units to charge the Art Center is 10. Councilmember L. Adams stated that with the additional information received he feels comfortable with 10 units for the Art Center. Acting Mayof Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to recommend the assessment of 10 sewer units for the Art Center and to combine the project of 85-2 with 85-1 . Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). City Attorney Radio noted that an assessment hearing should then be scheduled for the Art Center. City Administrator Bernhardson stated that staff will schedule an assessment hearing by June 22nd for the July 8, 1995, Council meeting. CONSENT AGENDA* Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Counci )member L. Adams seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda* as submitted, with all staff reports concerning these items ro be attached to an original copy of these minutes on file at the City Clerk's office. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). APPROVAL OF MINUTES* Acting Mayor Fratim moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve the minutes of the Orono Counci 1's regular meeting held May 28, 1985. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS MINUTES OF MEETINGS* TOUR CITY PARK SYSTEM* Acting Mayoi Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to accept the Park Commission minutes of April 2, 1985, and May 7, 19H5. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson asked for the number of Counci lmembers that will be able to attend the tour of the parks on June 18, 1985, at 6:00 p.m. Counci lmember!, Frahm, and T. Adams noted they wi 11 be able tc attend the tour. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSENVATION DISTRICT REPORT There was no Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Report. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Planning Commission Representative J. Diann Goetten was present but had no comments. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII. MEETING HELD JUNE 10, 1985 PAGE PUBLIC COMMENTS Herman Renner of 3180 North Shore Drive was present. Renner noted that he is having problems with North Shore Drive Marina again. Renner explained that he was promised that North Shore Drive Marina would not have any marina activity on the east side of the property. Renner noted that the marina continues to operate over on the east side. Renner explained that Larry Hork has had his boat parked there for weeks. Renner stated that Hork claims he has a variance or permission from the neighbor next to the boat. Renner noted that the neighbor doesn't have authority to grant him permission to park the boat there on the east side. Renner asked that no parking signs be placed on the east side to prevent this. Renner noted that Hork's boat parked on the east side acts as a decoy to bring the rest of the boats there. Renner asked the Council to investigate into the matter. Acting Mayoi Frahm asked that Herman Renner attend the Marina Committee meeting on June 19, 1985, when the North Shore Drive Marina will have their application reviewed. Frahm suggested that staff notify Renner when the meeting will be held so he can attend. Frahm also noted that staff should notify Larry Hork of the meeting and request his attendance. City Administrator Bernhardson noted that the City received a letter from Hork's attorney. Bernhardson noted that according to Hork's attorney the North Shore Drive Marina is in compliance with the LMCD's setbacks. Bernhardson noted that this has been referred to the LMCD for interpretation. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENTS Jerry Wheeler of 3399 Crystal Bay Road reviewed with the Council the complaint against him. Wheeler explained that with water in the basement and visitors coming over, he wanted to limit the personal liability against him. Wheeler stated that the way to keep the water f rom the basement was to leave the hardcover in place. Wheeler asked the Council to look at the situation from his point of view. Wheeler noted that he voted for Councilmember L. Adams because t. understood L. Adams to be honest and fair. Wheeler askec. Adams to be fair. Wheeler noted that he also issued a complaint against Dick Carl and asked what is being done with his complaint. Wheeler wanted to be assured that his complaint has been issued through the same channels for the same violations that his was issued. Wheeler asked for fair and equal treatment . Wheeler asked what is being done with his complaint. Building 6 Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that at the last CounciImeeting, staffincluded Wheeler's let ter noting the complaints and waited for Councils directive. Mabusth noted that Council gave no direction to staff. Jerry Wheeler of 3399 Crystal Bay Road stated that he would prefer that his complaint not be followed up, but for the same reasons that the City would not want to follow up on it. MINUTES OF THE: REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE: 1.0, 1985 PAGE: 5 Wheeler stated that he would like the same consideration. Wheeler stated that if the City doesn't feel they want to follow up on his complaint, then he wants the same consideration. Acting Mayor Frahm explained that the subject neighborhood has forced the City in a very precarious position legally. Frahm noted that the City is forced to do things by the book and that the City is past the point in trying to reason with the neighbors. Frahm stated that any complaint that Wheeler has f i led, staf f should follow up on and require a variance or citation if there is violations. Frahm noted that if Wheeler wishes to keep the hardcover, he wi 11 have to apply for a variance to the original variance. City Administrator Bernhardson noted that staff will report back to Council regarding Wheeler's complain against his neighbors in two weeks (June 24, 1985). Jerry Wheeler submitted two pictures of his neighbors that have their own parking pads and utilize them. Wheeler noted that he is anxious to solve the complaint.. Wheeler noted that the City was so prompt to act when a L mplaint came in against him, but took so long to act on his complaint against his neighbor. Wheeler stated that he has been asked by the City to get an engineer's opinion regarding the hardcover and formally requested the City make the same request of his neighbor. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENTS Sandy Sandgren of 121' Arbor Street stated that recent; the City had much controversy over a fence on Stubbs Bay blocking the lakeshore. Sandgren stated that the same situation has developed over at the end of Spates Avenue and Shoreline Drive. Sandgren stated that the fence blocks the view of the lakeshore and the Hennepin County road signs. Sandgren noted that kids are writing obscene words on the fence. Acting Mayor Frahm stated that the fence ordinance issue is on the agenda later in the evening. Frahm stated that staff is aware of the problem and has investigated into the matter. Frahm noted that the fence will be discussed later tonight. 1908 i #924 JON SCHERVE:N 2649 CASCO POINT ROAD VARIANCE i CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT RESOLUTION 11773 - VARIANCE: APPROVAL. RESOLUTION #1774 - CONDITIONAL USE. APPROVAL Jon Scherven and A.W. Scherven if 2649 Casco Point. Road were present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that applicant has revised plans according to Council's direction. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIh MEETING HELD JUNE 10, 1985 PAGE 6 Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Counci lmember I.. Adams seconded, to approve Resolution #177,, A Resolution approving a variance per revised plans showing no encroachment into the 0-75' setback zone, subject to the drawings to be attached to the resolution. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Counci lmember I.. Adams seconded, to approve Resolution #1774, A eesolution approving a conditional use permit to allow a g.._•st apartment use per revised plans showing. an open appearance in the entrance of the home, subject to the drawings to be att.achcd to the resolution. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). #910 JAMES HOFF 2056 SHADYWOOD ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION James Hoff was present. Neighbor Neil Blesi of 2064 Shadywood Road was also present. Assistant' Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that the applicant requests permission to regrade his lakeshore yard to better conform with his neighbors and create easier maintenance of the yard. Gaffron noted that the original plans did not reflect the applicant's intent and the applicant has revised the plans to show the contours to better match his surrounding neighbors. Gaf f ron stated that the appl i cant intends to cut down one of the retaining walls that is in disrepair. Gaffron noted that the grading would extend within 1.0' of the lakeshore. James Hof f stated that he has tried to mow the yard and it is too dif f icult with the steep slope. Hoff noted that he has turned over mowers trying to maintain his yard. Acting Mayor Frahm asked what the hardships were to justify granting of this conditional use permit. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron did note that there is def initely a safety factor in trying to maintain the yard. Gaf f ron reported that according to the neighbor the grade was originally what is proposed now and that. the previous owner filled in the area. Gaffron noted that the City Engineer's review of the original plan revealed that it would not help infiltration and may not be beneficial from an infiltration standpoint. Gaffron noted that during a rainfall rr snowmelt period, the runoff is slowed at the upper plateau where some infiltration occurs, but whateNinr hits the steep slope has a high runoff rate. Gaffron explained that with this regrading proposal there would be a gradual slope which might slow the runoff to the lakeshore but might also reduce infiltration. Nei 1 Blesi of 2064 Shadywood Road noted that he is in favor of the applicatiun and that the lot would look better. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE ',0, 1985 PAGE. 7 #910 HOFF (CONT.) Acting Mayor Frahm stated that he would like to see documentation from the neighbor (a signed affidavit or something) to prove that the grade existed as proposed now. Frahm noted that all the lots along there are high end difficult to mcw. Frahm stated that he needs a hardship t-) differentiate this property from others. Frahm noted that he could approve of the proposal if the existing original grade was what i s proposed and i f he could see documentation of such. James Hof f stated that the rurtoi f wi 11 probably be i mproved since the steep slope will be decreased and made into a more gr-dual sicpe. Councilmember L. Adams explained that is a lot of grading and is very close to the lakeshore. Adams noted that the resolution is written so that all grading would have to be done within a 24 hour period which would help the sif*,iation. Councilmember Grabek asker3 if the City has allowed this type of proposal before. Building & Zoning Mabusth stated that the City has allowed regrading of lakeshore lots because of serious erosion problems and to decrease the velocity of runoff into the lake. James Hoff noted that he plans to landscape the yard which would also help slow the r•_,noff. . Councilmember Grabek noted that this proposal is really a philosophical question that the Council must decide. Grabek noted that. if Council approves this, that anyone with steep lakeshore lots that have a difficult time maintaining it can come in and request the same. Grabek could not see granting the conditional use permit just because the applicant has difficulty mowing the lawn. Grabek noted that the property was purchased with the slope on the property. Grabek asked if the revised plans and change in contours changed the City Engineer's opinion on the project. James Hoff stated that the City should treat applications case by case. Hoff felt it was an unfair assessment to generalize with every high piece of land. Counci lmember Grabek disagreed with Hoff and noted that even though the Council considers properties one by one, their decisions still set precedents for future applications. James Hoff stated that there have been numerous accidents with the lawn mower and he wants to correct the problem L*-fore someone gets injured. Hoff stated that he is willing to comply with any requirements the Council may impose. Hoff felt that his application is not an impossible request_. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 10, 1985 PAGE 8 Acting Mayor Frahm felt that he could approve the application if he has proof that the lot was filled by the previous owner. Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to table the application to provide applicant sufficient time to generate the following: 1. A letter or affidavit confirming that the subject property was filled by the previous owner. 2. Grading plans must include landscaping plan and time schedule for plantings. Motion, Ayei (3), Nays (1). Councilmember Grabek voted nay. James Hoff also noted that it becomes a dangerous situation with the lakeshore when small children are in the lake and the lakeshore cannot be seen from his home. Hoff stated that a sm; 11 child could drown in the lake and he would not be able to see it from his home because of that slope in the lot. #912 GORDON HEDLUND 3990 NORTH SHORE DRT'! VARIANCES• Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to table the Gordon Hedlund application pending further information as requested by the applicant. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). f914 RICHARD KAUFFMANN 2696 ETHEL AVENUE VARIANCE RESOLUTION #1775 Richard Kauff.mann was present. Building 6 Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that the applicant seeks a variance to the average lakeshore setback line for construction of a new residence. Mabusth stated that the applicant has worked out with the neighbors the setback line and that the neighbors have agreed to the 17' extension in the average lakeshore setback. Mabusth stated that the applicant also requests that the existing home be allowed to stay on the property until the new home is completed. Richard Kauffmann stated that the home actually is located 101' fron; the lakeshore. Councilmember Grabek moved, Acting Mayor Frahm seconded, to approve Resolution #1775, A Resolution approving a variance to the average lakeshore setback line. Motion, Ayes We Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE RFGUI.AR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE: 10, 1985 PAGE 9 #916 KRIMMEL/ENGELSMA 960/990 PARTENWOOD ROAD LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT* Acting Mayor Frah.i moved, Councilmember L. A -Jams seconded, to recommend approval of the proposed plat of a lot line rearrangement for G.W. Krimmel and Bruce Engelsma based on the following findings: 1. The lots each contain the minimum required one acre in area. 2. All existing structures meet the required setbacks from the newly created lot. line. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). #919 T.M. SCHULTZE 1185 WYNDMERE ROAD AFTER THE FACT CONDITIONAL USE P1?MIT RESOLUTION 11776 T.M. Schultze was present. Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that at the time of the final inspection of the new Schultze resider.cA, staf f noted the excavation of a pond. Mabusth noted that the pond is not in a designated wetlands area and the pond serves as a collector basin fc.r all run-off from a small localized watershed. Ted Schultze noted that he was not aware that ne needed a permit to Excavate the pond. Schultze noted that the City has requested a 20' easement across the property and he is willing to give such easement. Acting Mayor Frahm r-)ted that it was not originally a designated wetland but that it will be now. Counci lmember T. Adams asked what the two pipes were draining into the pond. Ted Schultze stated that one is a pipe leading from the floor drain from his garage and the other is a iron filter pipe from his well. Council asked Engineer Mike Lynch if he would rccommend that pipes from floor drains and iron filter pipes be allowed to drain into a pond that eventually extends into a another wetlands. Engineer Mike Lynch stated that he would not recommend that the pipes be allowed to extend or drain into the pond. Staf f advised Schultze that they will work with the applicant. to find another location where he may direct tht• pipes in question. MINUTES OF THE REGUTAR ORONO COUNCIL. MFETING 11FLI) JUNE 10, 1985 PAGE 10 Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember T. Adams seconded, to approve Resolution #1776, A Resolution approving a conditional. rise permit for the excavatit— of a pond subject to staff adding another condition Lu the resolution to read "6. garage drain and iron filter drain may not drain into the pond and the relocation of those drains are subject to staff recommendation and approval." Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). #920 LOU FEGERS ?`)90 NORTH SHORE DRIVE Vr RIANCE Rl •.OL"TION #1777 Mr. and Mrs. Lou Fegers were present. Builder, Marty Bethke, was also present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that the applicant requests a hardcover and setback variance to replace a structurally unsafe ai tached garage with living space. Gaffron noted that the applicant has proposed tradeoffs in hardcover but that the hardcover would still increase in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone f -om 3.2% to 5.0% and from 3.8% to 56.8% in the 75-250' lakeshc re setback zone. Councilmember L. Adams felt that there is definitely a hardship on the property in that the garage is literally falling off. Acting Mayor Frahm noted that the future owner of the home will probably come to the City to ask for a variance to construct a garage. Frahm explained that he would have no problem approving a variance to replace the existing garage with more garage space, but that the applicant is requesting to eliminate any garage space and replace it with living space. Fr:.nm stated that by eliminating the garage space, it would leave a future owner with no garage. Frahm noted that it will be very hard for a future council not to grant a variance for a garage and that there is really no other room on the property to place a garage. Lou Fegers stated that they will not ask for a garage. Fegers stated that they will be able to landscape the area so as not to appear unsightly to anyone. Councilmember T. Adams noted t`iat the City cannot force people to construct a garage on their property and should not try to plan something in the future for someone else. Adam noted that he does have a problem with the extension into t 0-75' Lakeshore setback zone. Councilmember Grahex recognized the hardship on this property and telt that the amount of hardcover requested is minimal. Councilmember Grabek moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve Resolution #1777, A Resolution approving a variance for Lou Fegers to permit increases in hardeove-r in the 0-75' and I5-250' . Not. ion, Ayes (2 ), hays W . Councilmember T. Adams and 'acting Kayor Frahm voted nay. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII. MFETING HEI.0 JUNE 10, 1985 PAGE 11 Marty Bethke suggested reducing the size of the screened in porch so as not to extend into the 0-75' setback area. Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconde,, to approve Resolution #1777, A resolution approving a variance for Lou Fegers to permit the construction of a screened in porch and demolition of garage with addition in living space, subject to the square footage of hardcover in the 0-75' be equal to the square footage of hardcover being removed (shed and walkway). Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (1). Acting Mayor Frahm voted nay because of condition #4 in the resolution which states that nc future variances will be granted to the property and felt that this was not a realistic condition. CITY ENGINEERS REPORT BURLINGTON NORTHERN LEASE CRYSTAL BAY SEWER PROJECT* Acting Mayor Frr.hm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve the agreement with Burlington Northern Lease regarding the Crystal Bay Sewer Project. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). MAYORS REPORT There was no Mayor's report. CABLE TV REPORT There was no Cable TV report. TRANSPORTATION REPORT City Administrator Bernhardson noted that the variance hearing will be held on Friday, June 14, 1985 regarding County Poad 15. ATTRIBUTION OF SEWER UNITS TO VARIOUS PROPERTIES IN CRYSTAL BAY AREA SEWER PROJECT City Administrator Bernhardson recommended that the following units be assessed in the Crystal Bay sewer project: I. Sailors World property - 2 units 1. 1950 Shoreline Drive - 2 units 3. Tonka Transmission - 1 unit 4. City properties - 5 units Acting Mayor Frahm stated that 1950 Shoreline Drive should be assessed four units since they have four dwelling units on the property. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the City does not want to encourage four dwelling units on the property and that from a zoning standpoint it may nct be wise to asc. ign four sewer units. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII. MEETING IIEI,D JUNF. 10, 1985 PAGE 11 Acting Mayor Frahm noted that the City should condemn the other two units if they are not planned to be served with sewer, otherwise assign four units to the four dwelling units on 1950 Shoreline Drive. Frahm noted that there will probably be four dwelling units therefor a long time and it is adjacent to a commercial property. Questions were raised from the audience regarding past sewer projects and the way they were assessed. City Administrator Bernhardson answered such questions, and discussion continued among Councilr^embers. Councilmember L. Adams moved, Acting Mayor Frahm seconded, to approve the assignment of five units to the City properties. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). Councilmember T. Adams moved, Acting Mayor Frahm seconded, to assign two sewer units to Sailors World (1 for retail operation and 1 for pump out building) . Motion, Ayes ( 4) , Nays (0). Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember T. Adams seconded, to adopt Resoluton #1778, A Resolution assigning one sewer unit to Tonka Transmission, subject to staff revisions as discussed. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to direct staff to draft a resolution assigning four sewer units to 1950 Shoreline Drive. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). PAYMENT SCHEDULE ON ASSESSMENTS PROJECT 85-1 i 85-2 City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed the payment schedule for the Crystal Bay sewer project. Bernhardson. recommended that the equal principal with decreasing, interest pay,mentsbe adopted for easier accounting purposes. Councilmember Grabek moved, Councilmember T. Adams seconded, to adopt the equal principal anddecreasinci interest paynents schedule on the Crystal Bay Sewer Project. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). SET INTEREST RATE FOR SEWER PROJECT City Administrator Bernhardson noted that the bond rates awarded were 7.9156% and that staff recommends approximately 1.25% to be added for administrative charges. Bernhardson recommended that the interest rate he set at .�. Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Counci lrr ember L. Adams se,,:i,nded, to adopt. the interest rate Of 9.2% for the Crystal b.av sewer project. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MF: ,'TING HELD JUNE' 10, 1985 PAGE 13 RESOLUTION #1780 SPREAD ASSESSMENTS City Administrator Bernhardson stated that the number of assessments have just increased as a result of 1950 Shoreline Drive. Bernhardson stated that a total of 98 units will be assessed and would reduce the estimated $9,430/unit cost. Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to adopt Resolution ##1780, A Resolution Adopting Assessment Roll and spreading assessments over 98 units for sewer project 85-1. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). EASEMENTS TO DATE CRYSTAL BAY SEWER* Thera was no report regarding the easement acquisition. CDBG PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT PROGRAM 6 HOOKUP GRANT PROGRAM City Administrator Bernhardson updated the _Council regarding the CDBG assessment grant program. Bernhardson explained that $37,000 is set aside for hookups to the sewer project for those who qualify. Bernhardson stated that the grant program will be administered on a first come first serve basis and will be available sometime in August. Bernhardson explained that at the time the program is available, the City will notify the residents in the affected sewer project. RESOLUTION #1779 SENIOR CITIZENS DEFERMENT City Administrator Bernhardson noted the revised resolution concerning the senior citizens deferment program. Councilmember Grabek moved, Councilmember T. Adams seconded, to approve Resolution 01779,A Resolution Amending the program for deferment of special assessment for person 65 years of age or older. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). CASCO POINT TRAFFIC CONTROL MATTER City Administrator Bernhardson stated public rearing notice will be published regarding the proposed solution in the Casco Point neighborhood. Bernhardson stated that staff is investigating alternatives for the neighborhood. Councilmember Grabek moved, Acting Mayor Frahm seconded, to defer setting a public hearing date for June 24, 1985, ^garding the Casco Point traffic problem. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays Me CRIME PREVENTION FUND City Administrator Bernhardson stated that staff recommends that the Crime Prevention fund program be implemented. Bernhardson suggested a five member board of directors be appointed by the Council to initiate the non-profit organization. Bernhardson stated that. staff will bring this matter back beforr the Council on June 24, 1985 and asked Council to think of possit3le appointees for the committee. MINUTES OF THE: REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 10, 1985 PAGE 14 Council suggested that the people to be appointed not only come from Orono but from cities the police department serves such as Minnetonka Beach, Long Lake, and Spring Park if interested. ORDINANCE CLARIFICATION HEIGHT OF FENCE City Administrator Bernhardson stated that the current zoning ordinance regarding fences is vague. Bernhardson stated that based on staff's interpretation of the fence ordinance, fences up to 3 1/2 feet have been allowed in the 0-75' setback area. Bernhardson explained that the fence constructed at 2010 Shoreline Drive is a hazardous fence in that it obstructs the view of Hennepin County street signs, and the public access location. Bernhardson explained that Hennepin County permitted the owner at 2010 Shoreline Drive to construct a fence on the right of way. Bernhardson stated that the owner of 2010 Shoreline Drive and Hennepin County have agreed that if the fence is knocked down by County snow plows, Hennepin County will replace the fence. Bernhardson stated that however if the fence is knocked down by buildup of snow, it is up to the owner to replace the fence. Bernhardson noted that the fence is a public and safety nuisance standpoint as it exists. Bernhardson noted that even at 3 1/2 feet the fence could block the view from the public access. Bernhardson reported that the owner at 2010 Shoreline Drive has informed staff that if he is requested to remove the fence, he requests that staff enforce the rest of the fences around the lake. Bernhardson asked Council for clarification of the fence ordinance. One man in the audience noted that the fence depreciates the beauty and value of the shoreline. He reported that he saw a lady miss the bus because the fence blocked her view from the approaching bus. He noted that the fence makes a good fence for kids to write obsenities on. He noted that the snow will eat away the fence in the winter. City Administrator Bernhardson stated th. `.e owner claims that the fence is for the privacy of his : iily members for sunbathing. Bernhardson asked the Council if they interpret the ordinance to mean that no fences are allowed in the 0-75' setback area or only 3 1/3 foot fences allowed in the 0-75' area. One lady in the audience mentioned that this fence, if allowed to stay, will set precedents for future fences around the lake. Councilmember Grabek stated that the fence is a hazard and endangers the view and safety of traffic and pedestrians in that area and that the fence should come down. Grabek noted that the view is blocked for those exiting out of the public Access. Grabek noted that the owner should be tagged and ordered to remove the fence and invited to meet with the Council. MINUTES OF THE: REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 10, 1985 PAGE 14 Council suggested that the people to be appointed not only come from Orono but from cities the police department serves such as Minnetonka Beach, Long Lake, and Spring Park if interested. ORDINANCE CLARIFICATION HEIGHT OF FENCE City Administrator Bernhardson stated that the current zoning ordinance regarding fences is vague. Bernhardson stated that based on staff's interpretation of the fence ordinance, fences up to 3 1/2 feet have been allowed in the 0-75' setback area. Bernhardson explained that the fence constructed at 2010 Shoreline Drive is a hazardous fence in that it obstructs the view of Hennepin County street signs, and the public access location. Bernhardson explained that Hennepin County permitted the owner at 2010 Shoreline Drive to construct a fence on the right of way. Bernhardson stated that the owner of 2010 Shoreline Drive and Hennepin County have agreed that if the fence is knocked down by County snow plows, Hennepin County will replace the fence. Bernhardson stated that however if the fence is knocked down by buildup of snow, it is up to the owner to replace the fence. Bernhardson noted that the fence is a public and safety nuisance standpoint as it exists. Bernhardson noted that even at 3 1/2 feet the fence could block the view from the public access. Bernhardson reported that the owner at 2010 Shoreline Drive has informed staff that if he is requested to remove the fence, he requests that staff enforce the rest of the fences around the lake. Bernhardson asked Council for clarification of the fence ordinance. One man in the audience noted that the fence depreciates the beauty and value of the shoreline. He reported that he saw a lady miss the bus because the fence blocked her view from the approaching bus. He noted that the fence makes a good fence for kids to write obsenities on. He noted that the snow will eat away the fence in the winter. City Administrator Bernhardson stated th. `.e owner claims that the fence is for the privacy of his : iily members for sunbathing. Bernhardson asked the Council if they interpret the ordinance to mean that no fences are allowed in the 0-75' setback area or only 3 1/3 foot fences allowed in the 0-75' area. One lady in the audience mentioned that this fence, if allowed to stay, will set precedents for future fences around the lake. Councilmember Grabek stated that the fence is a hazard and endangers the view and safety of traffic and pedestrians in that area and that the fence should come down. Grabek noted that the view is blocked for those exiting out of the public Access. Grabek noted that the owner should be tagged and ordered to remove the fence and invited to meet with the Council. HIMITES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 10, 1985 PAGE 15 Building 6 Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the hazard is actually above what the fence ordinance allows. Councilmember L. '.jams movdd, Acting Mayor Frahm seconded, to of f irm staf f ' s interpretation of the fence ordinance to allow a 3 1/2 foot fence within the 0-75 setback area. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). Councilmember L. Adams moved, Acting Mayor Frahm seconded, to direct staff to take action and direct George Rovegno to remove the fence because of safety considerations for the public access or cut down the size of the fence to 3 1/2 feet and relocate the fence away from a hazardous location in order to alleviate the safety hazard with such relocation to be mutually agreeable with staff. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). ORONO-MEDINA-LONG LAKE SEWER - ROBBS MOTEL DEVELOPMENT City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed with the Council the sewer line locations near Highway 12. Bernhardson stated that in order to service the Robbs Motel development property, the City of Long Lake has requested to connect into the City of Orono's sewer line without taking any units away from the City of Orono. Bernhardson stated that staff has investigated the request to see if the hookup would affect any future Orono parcels that may be developed. Bernhardson noted that staff feels it will not affect any future developments. Councilmember Grabek noted that the agreement should be written so that Long Lake will pay for any improvements if there is any problems with the sewer lines. Councilmember L. Adams moved, Acting Mayor Frahm seconded, to direct staff to negotiate with the City of Long Lake and Medina an agreement addendum regarding the hookup to Orono lines . Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). BIG ISLAND STATUS REPORT City Administrator Bernhardson noted that his memo regarding the Big Island Veteran's Camp was just a status report. STATUS REPORT 2695 CASCO POINT City Administrator Bernhardson noted that 2695 Casco Point Road now has electricity and that the contractor will beqin pumping of the basement 24 hours a day. Bernhardson nosed that Chris Adams (builder) told staff that he could not meet the deadlines that staff set. Bernhardson noted that staff informed Adams that the City is willing to work with the builder as long as work continues on the home. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 10, 1985 PAGE 16 TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT* Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve the termination of the employment contract with Walter R. Benson. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). LIQUOR STORE -PAGE EDMUNDS PART-TIME EMPLOYEE* Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve the employment of Page Edmunds at $4.25/hour effective June 3, 1985. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). INFORMATION ONLY* Council accepted City Administrator Bernhardson's informational memo. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 130 CYGNET PLACE City Attorney Radio informed the Council that a formal complaint has been prepared for four different violations and he delivered to Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth for her signature in front of the judge. LICENSES* Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve the following licenses: Wayzata Country Club - Fireworks permit Halstad Contracting - Septic System Installer Baldy Sanitation - Garbage Hauler License Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). BILLS* Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, that the All Funds Accounts and Liquor Store Accounts be paid. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). ADJOURNMENT 12:10 PM Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to adjourn the regular meeting at 12:1C p.m. and to enter into executive session. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). I ATTEST: othy M. al lin f- City Clerk Mary C..IWt er, Mayor T, Tom Frahm, Acting Mayor AkT CENTER 01 MINNE50TA/2240 NORTHSHORE DRI'vE, C6YSLA1_ B©Y- AUNNlSU7©-5�i3?3/(6121 41-3-7;61 Wayzata, ;Minnesota SS391 May 24, 1985 Cite of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN SS323 RE: Art Center of Minnesota Sanitary Sewer Improvements Project No. 85-2 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: Q� µAY ? 8 P85 ; CITY OF ORON0 1 The Art Center of ;Minnesota is writing you regarding the proposal which is on the Orono City Council agenda for fonday, June 10, 1955. with repard to assessing the Art Center of Minnesota property for sanitary sewer improvements under the ?Minnesota special assessments 1a1:. Your proposal is to assess our property identified as 2240 North Shore Drive referred to as "Art Center of 'Minnesota best and our pro: -ty at 2180 North Shore Drive referred to as "Art Center of ;Minnesota East". It is our understanding that this Proiect 85-2 is to be done in con- junction with your Crystal Bay sanitary sewer Project 65-1. 1'.e hearby inform you that it is our belief that a sanitary sewer improve- ment project is not necessary for our facility and %•-e do not wish you to construct it. Further, we catarorically object to the assessment of our property for the sanitary se►:er project in the amount of $97,300 or for any other amount. We understand that you have assigned ten "units" at a cost of $9,730 each in arrivin- at your total assess- ment for the Art Cente: of Minnesota properties of $97,300. The property which you propose to assess is described as the Fast 474 feet of the North 459 feet of Government Lot 5, Township 117, Ranhe 23 West, Hennepin County, ,Minnesota, and is otherwise identified on your map attached hereto as "Art Center of Minnesota". To summarize, we object both to the construction of the easement and to your assessment of our land for it. Res)e�tfully submit d, te ILA - Katherine I,% Harder President AVT CLNI LR OF PII!\ USOTA Ki; : st, Planning Commission p4y 143 PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE C,' ! r= PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please prii,;) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) ? • F.PL=O w G ck 4. C, 0-111 ui, Cct> 5 . !G /- - ," 0Zc-�.trvsr,c�� 6_1' es 7. r 8 Jtz,_ ([1 9'- 10. 1 1 l 12. �f�Vtiu,cef 13 . N � r e�y c41 � �• � _}�.. 14. e -1 15. 16 . 17.18 20. C,?rsr4[ BAY SFw'LR .1 n ' / -r = , Planning Commission i 1 1 1 1 I 1 PUBLIC ATTE14DANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE V ID' LqX PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER, NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 1 2 3. - &A 9 oZ 5. J C.C11 t 11 e` ['fir 1►1, , u 9 4 rl / Z- 6. tj M g D ' -) _ #I 7. 061rV 31,0 *Cge X YM P'. b I I 9. cL"L ycJ l.J�l t / - A �5 cc-�rl ; A o 5"Oa4i 1 2. 41rr'2 P,17 ���N ern; ,� �� �f� ,��• ;e/ 41C 3. 7 7-> - 5. 6. 8. 9.oil__`_--- . C.�4 planning Commission „, o/3 Council PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 2 T�� �4� ��s Q rle� 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 0. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 0. 1985 ORONO RECONVENED BOARD OF REVIEW - JUNE 10, 1985 The 1985 Board of Review reconvened on June 10, 1985 at 6:30 p.m. The following were present from the Council: Acting Mayor Frahm, Counci l members L. Adams, and Grabek. Councilmember T. Adams arrived at 7:39 p.m. Mayor Butler was absent. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, City Attorney Radio, and Recorder Sutton. City Assessor Rolf Erickson was also present. Acting Mayor Frahm called the meeting to order at 6: 35 p.m. City Administrator Bernhardson noted that three members of the public were at the May 30, 1935, Board of Review meeting presenting two appeals. Bernhardson explained that the Councilmembers received a random sampling of sales in the Orono area and also the A::sessor's recommendations regarding the requested changes in valuations at the last Board of Review meeting. Bernhardson noted that information received tonight regarding the Rossing residence at 130 Cygnet Place should include a market value of that property of $108,000. Mr. and Mrs. Charles Boehm of 997 Wildhurst Trail were present. Boehm noted that he submitted a letter to City Hall for the C'ouncilmembers stating his position. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the letter Boehm wrote was included in the Council packets for their review. Mr. Charles Boehm of 997 Wildhurst Trail (PID N07-117-23 21 0004) stated that he feels his property value is unfair. Boehm stated that even though he paid $165,000 for the home, he did not realize that the home needed extensive remodeling and he felt that the home was not worth $165, 000. Boehm noted that the home was on the market for 14 months which should have been a test for the true valuation. Boehm stated that the garage is sagging and he has received a quote from a contractor of $15,000 to repair the garage. Boehm stated that he tried to appeal last year but missed the deadline for appeals. Boehm felt that the Assessor is not aware of the extensive remodeling that is needed and the cost of reconstruction of the garaqe that has structural problems. Boehm felt that his valuation should be $128,000. Assessor Rolf Erickson stated that he was not aware of the cost to repair the garage and did not figure that the garage would cost $15,000 to repair. Erickson stated that taking into account the repairs needed that he would feel comfortable reducing the assessment by $5,000. Acting Mayor Fr, moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to reduce Charles Boehm's at 997 Wildi Trail (PID 007-117-23 21 0004) 1985 market value $5,000 to reflect a 1985 of value of $143,900. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to approve the Assessor's recommendations on the following valuations: Alan McDowell, 905 Ferndale Road West (02-117-23 44 0010) with a 1985 market valuation of $745,000 - No Change. Marvin Borman, 1080 Tonkawa Road (08-117-23 13 0011 i 0010) with a 1985 market valuation of $401,200 for both parcels - No Change. Clara Lyman, 825 Old Crystal Bay Road (09-117-23 21 0001 i 0005) with a 1985 market valuation of $637,800 for PID (09-117-23 21 0001 ) and a valuation of $130,000 for PID (09-117-23 21 0005) - No Change. 1985 ORONO RECONVENED BOARD OF REVIEW - JUNE 10, 1985 - PAGE 2 Robert Owens, 1700 Bohns Point Road (16-117-23 22 0003 ) with a 1985 market valuation of $383,100 - No Change. Balboa Inc. , Shoreline Drive (17-117-23 34 0005, 0006, 0007, 6 0008 ) with a 1985 market valuation of $108,900 - No Change. Margaret Rossing, 130 Cygnet Place (04-117-23 22 0023) with a 1985 market valuation of $102,200 reduced $6,500 from $108,700. Spring Hill Conference Center, Spring Hill Road - with regard to the appeal for the tax exempt states it was recommended that determination be made by the tax court. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to approve the minutes of the Board of Review meeting of May 30, 1985. Motion, Ayes ( 4) , Nays (0). Acting Mayor Frahm adjourned the reconvened Board of Review meeting at 6:59 p.m. ATTE&ir : I o thy M. lin, Ckty Clerk Thomas Frahm, Acting Mayor AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JUNE 10, 1985, 6:30 P.M. Asterisk items arc to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Counci 1 under tho r'onsent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. ROLL CALL 6:30 P.M. 1. Reconvened 1985 Board of Review - *R" nutes of May 30, 1985 7:00 P.M. 2. Award Sale of Bonds - Resolution 3. Art Center of Minnesota Public Hearing - Sewer Project Extension 4. CONSENT AGENDA* APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 5. Regular Meeting of May 28, 1985 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS * 6. Minutes c teetings April 2, 1985 and May 7, 1985 * 7. Tour City nark System - June 18, 1985, 6:00 P.M. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - J. Diann Gotten Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 8. #908 and #924 Jon Seherven, 2649 Casco Point Road - Variance - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution (2) 9. #910 James L. Hoff, 2056 Shadywood Road - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution *10. #912 Gordon Hedlund, 3990 North Shore Drive - Varian. -es 11. #914 Richard C. Kauffman, 2696 Ethel Avenue - Variance - Resolution *12. #916 G. W. Krimmel and Bruce Engelsma, 960 and 990 Partenwood Road - Lot Line Rearrangement 13. #9 1 9 1'. M. Schultze, 1 185 Wyndmere Road - After the Fact Conditional Use Permit - Resolution 14. #920 Lou Fegers, 3590 North Shore Drive - Variance - Resolution CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT *15. B,.irlington Northern Lease - Crystal Bay Sewer Project MAYOR'S REPORT CABLE. TV REPORT TRANSPORTATION REPORT CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 16. Attribution of Sewer Uaits to Various Properties in Crystal Bay Area 17a. Payment Schedule on Assessments Project 85-1 and 85-2 b. Set Interest Rate on Assessments - Resolution c-. Spread Assessments AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JUNE 10, 1985, 6:30 P.M. *18. Easements to Date - Crystal Bay Sewer Area 19. C.D.B.G. Programs - Assessment Program and Hookup Grant Program 20. Senior Citizens Deferment - Resolution 21. Casco Point Traffic Control Matter 22. Crime Prevention Fund 23. Ordinance Clarification - Height of Fence 24. Orono -Medina -Long Lake Sewer - Robbs Motel Development 25. Big Island Veterans Camp 26. Status Report - 2695 Casco Point Road *27. Termination of Employment Contract *28. Part Time Employment - Liquor Store ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION *29. Highway 12 Report *30. Hennepin VoTech Sewer Hookup Allocation *31. County Road 15 *32. Deferred Compensation *33. Sale to Minor Violation *34. Public Access/DNR *35. Marina Committee - June 19, 1985 CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 36. Status Report - 130 Cygnet Place LICENSES (37*) BILLS (38*) ADJOURNMENT 14 i 1985 Orono Board of Review COUNCIL MEETING Assessor Recommendations JUN 1019a5 Alan S. McDowell � 905 Ferndale Rd. West CITY OF ORONO 02 117 23 44 0010 Sold 8/83 $825;000.00 3 acres of land on Browns Bar/one site only 1985 Market Value $745.000.00 Mr. McDowell purchased the Bagley property August. 1983 for $825.000.00. The ol- house was removed except for the foundation and a new house has been built on the old foundation. On January 2, 1985 the new house was calculated as 50% complete. RECOMMEND: No Change Charles & Mary Ann Boehm 997 Wildhurst Trail 07 117 23 21 0004 III front feet on channel on North end of Forest Lake 1864 sq ft split level house Purchased 6/84 for $165.000.00 1985 Market Value $148.900.00 When purchased the house was reportedly in run down condition. Most of the redecorating has been completed. I have considered the financing and the condition of the on January 2, 1985. RECOMMEND: No Change. V -� Borman I ankawa Road Ot :si 23 13 0011 08 117 23 13 0010 170 front feet on Maxwell Bay 3493 sq ft ground floor area 1985 Market value $401.200.00 (both parcels) We have a 1984 court petition pending on this property. I have not completed the appraisal for that year yet. RECOMMEND: No change t 2 Clara C. Lv.nan 825 Old Crystal Bay Rd. 09 117 23 21 0001 09 117 23 21 0005 Approximately 22 acres on Maxwell Bay 2455 sq. ft. ground floor area caretakers house also 1985 Market Value 09 117 23 21 0001 $637.800.00 09 117 23 21 0005 $130.000.00 This property has a 1984 court petition pending, and I have not completed the appraisal for that year. RECOMMEND: No chancre Robert & Carol Owens 1700 Bohn's Point Road 16 117 23 22 0003 150 front feet on Crystal Bay 2739 sq. ft. ground floor area Sold 3/83 for $444,000.00 1985 Market Value $383,100.00 Mrs. Owens was going to attend the Board of Review on May 30th, but didn't appear. I have not been able to contact her since then. RECOMMEND: No chanoe Balboa Incorporated Shoreline Drive 17 117 23 34 0005 17 117 23 34 0006 17 117 23 34 0007 17 117 23 34 0008 Total area of land 296220 =_q. ft. 1985 Market V:»tue $108.900.00 The front portion of this land is low and marshy. but the rear is high and nicely wooded. The land is valued at $.25 per sqaure foot. This is a fair value if the property, is to be used for sinole family sites. RECOMMEND: No Change 3 Spring Hill Center - I have asked the County for an opinion on the exemption of the two additional parcels. All new exempt parcels are required to be abated by Hennepin County. I believe these two parcels have been turned down for exemption. RECOMMEND: Let tax court make decision Marge Rossing 130 Cygnet Place 04-117-23 22 0023 Property reviewed on June 3nd, 1985. Scott Mann bought the property in January 1984 for $95,000. Assignment for contract for deed was f i led for Marge Rossing in Apri 1 1984. RECOMMEND: Reduction of market value to $102,200. The reduction is based on the poor interior of the home, not based on exterior condition and residue in the yard. Market value dcns include incompleted garage. 1985 ORONO BOARD OF REVIEW MAY 30, 1985 The 1985 Board of Review met on Thursday, May 30, 1985. Acting Mayor Frahm called the meeting to order at 7:25 P.M. Mayor Butler, Council - members Grabek, T. Adams and L. Adams were absent. Glenn Busitzky re- presented Hennepin County. Representing the City were Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator; Dorothy Hallin, City Clerk; Teri Naab, Recorder; Rolf Erickson, City Assessor and Dave Wild, Assistant City Assessor. Acting Mayor Frahm explained to the audience the process and purpose of the Board of Review. He explained that anyone who is at this meeting has the right to appeal to the County and State Board of Reviews if they so desire, but their presence must be noted at tonights meeting either by appearing before the Board or signsng the attendance sheet and noting their street address, property I.D. number and phone number where they can be reached during the day. Questions from the audience were answered by the the Board, Mr. Erickson and Mr. Wild. The reconvened meeting of the 1985 Board of Review was scheduled for Monday, June 10, 1985 at 7:00 P.M. Appearing before the Board were: 1. Donald Sorenson, Attorney for Charles Boehm, 997 Wildhurst Trail 07-117-23 21 0004 Mr. Sorenson stated that it had come to his attention that he could wait to take his clients petition to the June loth meeting or submit the petition in writing, therefore, he would prefer to wait. No action by the Board. 2. Marge Rossing, 130 Cygnet Place - 04-117-23 22 0023 Ms. Rossing stated she requested a revaluation of her property. She questioned why her market value had risen in the past year since her neighbors have said all their values have decrease since she has moved into the neighborhood one year ago. Wild noted that he had been to the property to assess the large garage that had just been built. Erickscn stated that a total review had not been done this year. An appointment was set for June 6, 1985 at 5:30 p.m. to do a total review, the results will be sub- mitted to the Board June loth. Council for action. No action by the Board. Acting Mayoi Frahm closed the meeting at 7:36 P.M. The reconvened meeting will be June 10, 1985 at 6:30 P.M. The following property owners have submitted letters which have been received and noted by the Board: Robert H. Owens, 1700 Bohn's Point Road - 16-117-23 22 0003 Alan S. McDowell, 905 West Ferndale Road - 02-117-23 44 0010 Clara C. Lyman, 825 Old Crystal Bay Road So. - 09-117-23 21 0001/5 Spring Hill Center - 26-118-23 44 0004 and 26-118-23 41 0002 Marvin 6 Betty Borman, 1080 Tonkawa Road - 08-117-23 13 0011 Balboa Minnesota Co., Vacant Land - 17-117-23 34 0005/6/7/8 ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Planning ibmmission Council it �XICK k��,��� PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY'RECORDS. -P.ry # NAME -9R NUMBER - NAME (please print) ADDRESS P.R _agenda4_ 1. CNg2��LS DOE/-I�'�1 997 w,1460ras'f PA.( O'7-11-7• 23--oc 3. 4. /3o ii - A3 -a,� On, 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 0. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 0. �O4 o3 �3 76 6 Alan S. McDowell May 30, 1985 Board of Review S C� �? ` City of Orono D Orono, MN ' 11 MAY 3 c %5 Gentlemen, • I- CITY OF ORONO I have reviewed the 1985 valuation notice on our property at 905 West Ferndale Road. The proposed amount represents a 30% increase fron. last year, on top of a 22% increase for the prior year. I have had a preliminary discussion with Mr. Erickson. However we did not have enough time to conduct a thorough review of the assessment. Nevertheless, because of the very substantial increases of the last two years and a further jump proposed for next year, I am concerned that my valuation may be out of line with comparable properties because we have recently purchased and refurbished the property. Therefore I would like to reserve the right to appeal the valuation if further analysis indicates it is appropriate. Sincerely yours, Alan S. McDowell 905 We -a I erndah- Flo 4l'.%%,i.t1a. MN 55391 ' GRAY, PLANT, moon% moo'1 , & BENNE.17 A .Ae•N[.SNIO INCLUDING .ITC/[SS—NAL ASSOCIATIONS- -..olo a c•". i.e/[.e.fl � � .e r.. ,. —4. /coc. I•//• -/rr. I..4W oFr•Ices III-1 P 3400 CITY CE\TER .,.»•. « p o... Ip"« r ...{a wt/ • roll f•... / e•of w.r ���"" " ''•"• '• "O" ' °"" THIRTY-THREE SOl'Ttl SIXTH STREET »[..« . »oo.. .c -•ta . cu««row•r MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 5540: .ro»•/ • « a-(.w. o.r.o " roo.. a.,,. r(,r •.... . • •f.a»." I//a.a » /t««n• C.�w•ON •. /Cr.Of Of• [aot«{ . ou• ...fw C •.0 w••O • w•Cr[•. •... a�• /pra ..C..... Noo.c,.. TF.I.EPHOKF. 612.343-2800 ' """ ° "l'" ot•[. a cp..0 w[/ / / ror/pr f•t•-t, I f«•o[+ TELF.COPIER 612.333-0066 '• w�.+ ••C r.,O » ta�N. ItI(.t•: •f •[f TWX P10. 576. 2778 /co. or.- a •(.« •N •t.w•.iO r•a GOY«/ca " c ,[//a... or«c c /..ra(. /•Yct o e•wn«o .�u.•N L . ,.or ` o•r�o » co•rc o. ceY.ua L /•(r(r W�af O« 10-• •r(/ f•[•r[r • t�01 •O/[,♦ , r[.a•rp .O-r f c•oYc. .11%t.•. +. «O.•Or roc -•fa c .ap» •O/{•• • f•[ « O •v0 • •[rrt•• Ipr« [ /•Ort• „�• • • r• t�... { [p•.:vrp.. . . •.p.t. . .,.«.pr .rp».. p..r«e DIRECT DIAL••••«[• ( 612) 34 3- 2999 �`::.:.-g o- May 22, 1985 City of Orono Board of Review P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Attention: Mr. Rolf Erickson Re: Property Address: 825 Old Crystal Bay Road South PID No.: 09-117--23•-21-0001 and 09-117-23-21-0005 Taxpayer: Clara C. Lyman Ownez: Clara C. Lyman Dear Mr. Erickson: This letter constitutes appearance by writtEn communication before the City of Orono Board of Review (herein the "Board") pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 274.01, subd. l(b). As attorneys for the owner of the real estate described above, we hereby appear before the Board to object to the assessor's valuation of the property at $637,800 with respect to PID No. 09-117-23-21-0001 and $130,000 with respect to PID No. 09-117-23-21-0005 as of the assessment date January 2, 1985, for the taxes payable in 1986, and apply for a review thereof. Said valuation is excessive and greater than the real or actual value of the real estate, which has been partially, unfairly and unequally assessed for taxes payable in 1986. Please contact the undersigned should you require further information and to discuss possible resolution of this matter. very truly yours, GRAY, PLANT, MOOTY, MOOTY 6 BENNETT, P.A. By JWT/mp rc Clara C. Lyman F-AEC RE & BEN SO�` 7 �,. o'�:.. �..rf •�•n:i - ,«.. 'r 'r'i I:: •. ���;, �. : �w Z300 MULTIf OOnS TOw[a V�•� »N"f :.: :r. '" « «" �: r• ' 1a1 • oi,: �..... • .»�[[....a...tY oa .i s�• wi —Is r'ior 33 SOUTH SIXTH STnELT a. u��iwa •:w" wa'«o 'lwO, f01 •FLn� •`y = lwiOr DJ C-•wat i•a•wOw« O•••4 •1 a,• 40w w� •O l`p •r i.�li w0 •. .O •• �Crri Oar 't it Orl O V�+iyo MINN CItPOL15, MINNCS0111 53402 •J68, ::w: •r:••:,iw � r.1 w: c��<�aw �c•:or�r�« cc•co. •yso•a-1• :".�:::c o.r D O rwra•r•r0 J; ' rtl •a .O"ai r:�',•r ttOtr••i. w.. r^r i•.tw ~M b• �f�w f •..it ••O« NCO.. � r •r .• Iw al „I �n �iti(at0«'.w � Olt/))r fLOD .lr •f, • wFirr _•: w•wt ; r •t«c( •• ' �� for iw... • o r i•i :.:o :ni•.:.r �:w o. r ..i.i�: is to [ r T[l[w .t Sl )1 i.o�i•r :�:[:.�: u.•[l [ o�rra[w raa [ c•-•nor •un•[ Jo-•. [• w r .i ��• �w.r • uw• i•i:ir� �tawfor <-••c c s<rro•rw •or«.( r ,lr w o::� w•aJ ••it~o -c•••i rwo{i. «�r •f •ww .. • • 4 r Vowt.•oya[ ' i[wL ••-••t � wcia[�a• r. O.r[n O• «Cf• •w•r•O•r •: •tr twi w• r• •D r •.r«nl Crr • J •f •• „t ryr C•fCr :O(Y :r[w••1w t.•+• f•f O(•ryrD w•tfw • t• •.4 w( rOw••n J •(w0 r•r O•w• wOit Yr w u, br r•C w•.•r.C••r•Ov•J••r —..iti OwC�[• ' [t•r ••r•,Li �•• : •wn ••D rt aOt fua•r ibObY•.uw( DOvO f O O f•rr•r: (f Cnwia•.rl O r(ww,r•r •.t t •t•••Ofrt• G•.t • r(aavr •.1 r1 r O•f•.rf w0•t Yr r[«•Oti ..rOr «• iCru•• b••r• •OuwG r0•••f" .a••• w {r,OLw i i'l rG Oi S!/!O AC .0 •lIC wc•7• lr••al. t yw-(w•••r• 1.• •�r •w(^ r f1_l• r •t r. w[• 74 -t••L ••.:[ JOrO {'t•.tr O{rOa• [«• f «i�r O•r�p Y• iaat:•taa 370 fC V[NT[C M1M •TpCCT =Yr•-a p •w " w CO.— r•w�".ao« ii DCNV[w, Cblow•DO •Ot Ot••00• r n`ai . _.t, .. r••wt w, J• •i.�'c: ....,.. [: or a�f •iOr 303/598 SOYO •rrr4r. . . May 16, 1985 Ms. Dorothy Hallin City Clerk of Orono P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Spring "ill Center Dear Ms. Ha: 1 in : Enclosed and hereby served upon you is a Statement of A,-1pezrance by Wr_tten Communication on behalf of the above -named part Very truly yours, Lyle G. Ward LGW/k s Enclosure STAT :lENr of nrri:111/1NCE, J by UNITrE',: COAIU rlCAT10:1 Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, sections 271.01 (subd. 5) and 278.01 (subd. 1), Spring Hill Center ("Petitioner"), !reby appears by written communication before the Local Board of Review of Orono, Minnesota, and states that: (1) Petitioner has an interest in certain real property (the ("Property") located in the City of Orono, County of flunnepin, State of Minnesota, which is identified by following property identification numbers: 26-118-23 44 0004 26-118-23 41 0002 (2) For purposes of real estate taxes payable during 1986, the Property has been assessed unequally, discriminatorily and in violation of law to the extent that the total estimated market value assigneJ to the Property roes not reflect the fact that the Property is exempt from taxation as property devoted to and reasonably nec► y for the accomplishment of the -heritable purposes of P !titioner. (3) Petitioner hereby appeals the assessment referred to above and requests that the Property be determined to be -xempt fron taxation. Date: May 16, 1985. By.S; � G. L Attorney for Petitioner Faegre 6 Benson 2300 Multifouds Tower 33 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 n rrr c r b MARVIN BORMAN IRVINO R. BRAND STEPHEN S. SWARTZ CHARLES OUAINTANCE, JR. NEIL I. SELL MICMAEL A. SWIRNOr'r RO&CRT A. ENOELME RONALD 0. VANTINE MICMAEL O GOLDNER MARTIN O. WEINSTEIN WILLIAM Z. PCNTELOVITCH JOSEPH ALEXANDER MICMAEL L. SNOW BARBARA R. HAUSER OARY J. HAUDEN T H C M A S M. BORMAN R C S E C C A PALMER MASLON EDELMAN BORMAN 6 BRAND ISOO MIDWEST PLAZA MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPMONE (41&` 330-8015 HAND DELIVERED May 30, 1985. TO: Mr. Rolf Erickson c/o Local Board of Review Hennepin County Board of Equalization 14520-12th Avenue North Plymouth, Minnesota WRITTEN COMMUNICATION TO LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW PURSUANT TO MINN. STAT. 278.01 AND 274.13 Re: Real Estate Taxes Pay-Tble In 1986 for Property Identification Nos. 08-117-23 13 0010 and 08-117-23 13 0011, Auditor's Subdivision No. 217, Lot 009, Hennepin County, Minnesota Dear Sir: M A R . SA U M A N N DAVID F. MERR MARY P. FOARDE . RICHARD G. WILSON LAWRENCL M. SHAPIRO N OW A R D S. TA R M OW WILLIAM M MOWER JErFREY W. STEMPEL JOEL H. GREEN VIRGINIA A. SELL JUSTIN M. PERL MIRM D. SMERMAN MAR, R VASALY .'MAN EDELMAN O. COVN*CL SAMOEL H MASLON PET1REo In accordance with Minn. Stat. 278.01 and 274.13, Marvin and Betty Borman Lereby appeal the assessment of the real property located at 1080 Tonkawa Road in Hennepin County, Minnesota, bearing the identification numbers referred to above, for real estate taxes payable in 1986 on the grounds that said property has been unequally and unfairly assessed at a value greater than its real or actual value, and that said parcel has been assessed at a valuation which exceeds by 10% or more, the value which the parcel would have if it were valued at the average assessment/sales ratio for real property in the same class, in that portion of the county in which said parcel is located. MASLON EDELMAN BORMAN 6 BRAND By C4 . -� Virg • . a A. Bell ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONERS VAB:sf JOSEPH A MALIN MERLYN C. GREEN LAW RENCE J HAVES JEROME B SIMON JOHN C JOHANNESON JAME!k W BREHL SRUC.: O ODLAUG R ICHARO T. MCHAf,IE ALBERTA WOODWARD RICHARD D DONOMOO G.RnETTE MULROONEY WILLIAM J HASSINn M 041CHAEL MONAHAN CHAR ,-5 SANS SARR.• A GEPSICK GEOrIREY P JARPE RICHARD M OAALSWYK GREGORY J HOLLY LARRY 6 GUTHRIE CANDICE M HOJAN ROLF C GILSERTSON SETH M COLTON GREGORY J M( FEET NANCY BURKE HUPP JAMES G. WEIN►.EYER TIMOTHY P. DANIELS MAUN, GREEN, HAYES. SIMON, JOHANNESON AND BREHL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 332 HAMM BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA BS102 Orono Board of Review c/o City Assessor 1335 Brown Road So. P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 TELEPHONEAC-612-224-7300 T E LECOPIE R: 612-296-091 s May 24, 1985 Re: PID # 17-117-23 34 0005 17-117-23 34 0006 17-117-23 34 0007 17-117-23 34 0008 Dear Sirs: MINNEAPOLIS OFFICE NORTHLAND EXECUTIVE OFFICE CENTER SUITE 5:0 3500 WEST BOTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55431 TELEPHONE' AC-612-835-9550 This law firm represents the owner of the property described on the enclosed 1985 Valuation Notices. We contend that the valuations stated in such notices are tot) high and should be reduced. Therefore, we hereby appeal to you to reduce said valuations. This appearance is being made pursuant to Minnesota Law 1985, Chapter 502, Article 11, Sections 2 and 4. Very truly ours, / l Richard M. Gaals RMG:es EnclosurL-s cc: Ms. C. Michelle Marlo (w/encls.) Mr. Daniel Tyson (w/encls.) Hennepin County Assessor (w/enc.ls.) Mr. Bruce Odl�juy CERTIFIED MAIIJ RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED CITY ASSESSOR 1335 BROWN RD S P.O. BOX 66 ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY 1985 VALUATION NOTICE MN 55323 BALBOA MINNESOTA CO ATTN PRESIDENT 20221 PRAIRIE ST P 0 BOX 977 CHATSWORTH CA 91311 1985 ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE 26,700 PROPERTY ID 17-117-23 34 0005 ORONO 1985 CLASSIFICATION VACANT LAND NONHOMESTEAt IF YOU HAVE GOOD REASON TO BELIEVE THAT EITHER YOUR VALUE OR CLASSIFICATION IS INCORRECT, YOU MAY CALL 473-1844 WITHIN THE NEXT 5 BUSINESS DAYS. IF NECESSARY, AN APPOINTMENT CAN THEN BE MADE FOR YOU TO DISCUSS YOUR INFOP.M,A- ION WITH AN APPRAISER/ASSESSOR. ITHE LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW IS SCHEDULED FOR MAY 30, 7 00 PM AT ART CENTER OF MINN AUDITORIUM THE HENNEPIN COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION WILL MEET FOP. TWO WEEKS BEGINNING JULY 8, 1985. YOU MUST HAVE APPEARED AT THE LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW TO BE ELIGIBLE TO APPEAR BEFORE AUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION. FOR AN APPOINTMENT TO APPEAR AT THE COU RD YOU MAY CALL 348-5076 BY JULY 12, 1985. STATE TAX COURT. STATE LAW PROVIDES THAT A PROPERTY OW%FR CAN NOT APPEAL TO THE TAX COURT OR DISTRICT COURT FOR A REVIEW OF HIS OR HER ASSESSMENT UNLESS A TIMELY APP7f RANCT IN PFPTON, BY COUNSEL OR BY WRITTEN COMMUNICATION HAS G. -N MAD= BEFORE THE LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW AND COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION. FOR INFORMATION ON THE TAX, COURT CONTACT THE TAX COURT OFFICE, 444 LAFAYETTE ROAD, ST PAUL, MN, 55101. TELEPHONE 296-2806. CITY ASSESSOR 1335 BROWN RD S P.O. BOX 66 ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY 1985 VALUATION NOTICE MN 55323 BALBOA MINNESOTA CO ATfN PRESIDENT 20221 PRAIRIE ST P 0 BOX 977 CHATSWORTH CA 91311 1985 ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE 27,700 PROPERTY ID 17-117-23 34 0006 ORONO 1985 CLASSIFICATION VACANT LAND NONfIOMEST-Al IF YOU HAVE GOOD REASON TO BELIEVE THAT EIT`iER YOUR VALUE OR CLASSIFICATION 1S INCORRECT, YOU MAY CALL 473-1844 WITHIN THE NEXT 5 BUSINESS DAYS. IF NECESSARY, AN APPOINTMENT CAN THEN BE MADE FGR YOU TO DISCUSS YOUR INFORMA- ION WITH AN APPRAISER/ASSESSOR. ITHE LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW IS SCHEDULED FOR MAY 30, 7 00 P1l AT ART CENTER OF MINK AUDITORIUM THE HENNEPIN COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION GILL MEET FOR TWO WEEKS BEGINNING DULY 8, 1985. YOU MUST HAVE APPEARED AT THE LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW TO BE ELIGIBLE TO APPEAR BEFORE THE COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION. FOR AN APPOINTMENT TO APPEAR AT THE COUNTY BOARD YOU MAY CALL. 348-5076 BY JULY 12, 1985. STATE TAX COURT. STATE LAW PROVIDES THAT A PROPERTY OWNER CH„ NOT APPEAL TO THE TAX COURT OR DISTRICT COURT FOR A REVIEU OF HIS OR HER ASSESSMENT UNLESS A TIMELY APPEARANCE IN PERSON, BY COUNSEL OQ BY WRITTEN COMMUNICATION HAS BEEN MADE BEFORE THE LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW AND COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION. FOR INrORMATION ON THE TAX COURT CONTACT THE TAX COURT OFFICE, 444 LAFAYETTE ROAD, ST PAUL, MN, 55101. TELEPHONE 296-2806. CITY ASSESSOR 1335 BROWN RD P.O. BOX 66 ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY 1985 VALUATION NOTICE MN 55323 BALBOA MINNESOTA CO ATTN PRESIDENT 20221 PRAIRIE ST P 0 BOX 977 CHATSWORTH CA 91311 j1985 ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE 13,200 PROPERTY ID 17-117-23 34 0007 ORONO 1985 CLASSIFICATION VACANT LAND NONHOMESTEAI IF YOU HAVE GOOD REASON TO BELIEVE THAT EITHCD YOUR VALUE OR CLASSIFICATION IS INCORRECT. YOU MAY CALL 473-1844 WITH1 NEXT 5 BUSINESS DAYS. IF NECESSARY, AN APPOINTMENT CAN THEN BE M;DE F- YOU TO DISCUSS YOUR INFORMA- ION WITH AN APPRAISER/ASSESSOR. THE LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW IS SCHEDULED FOR MAY 30, 7 00 PM AT ART CENTER OF MINN AUDITORIUM 'TH= HENNEPIN COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION WILL MEET FOR TWO WEEKS BEGINNING JULY 8, 1985. YOU MUST HAVE APPEARED AT TH! LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW TO BE ELIGIBLE TO APPEAR BEFORE THE COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION. FOR AN APPOINTMENT TO APPEAR AT THE COUNTY BOARD YOU MAY CALL 348-5076 BY JULY 17, 1985. STATE TAX COURT. STATE LAW PROVIDES THAT A PROPERTY OWNER CAN NOT APPEAL TO THE TAX COURT OR DISTRICT COURT FOR A REVIEW OF HIS OR HER ASSESSMENT UNLESS A TIMELY APPEARANCE IN PERSON, BY COUNSEL OR BY WRITTEN COMMUNICATION HAS BEEN MADE BEFORE THE LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW AND COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION. FOR INFORMATION ON THE TAX COURT CONTACT THE TAX COURT OFFICE, 444 LAFAYETTE ROAD, ST PAUL, VU, 55101. TELEPHONE 296-2806. CITY ASSESSOR 1335 BROWN RD S P.O. BOX 66 ORONO I,ENNEPIN COUNTY 1985 VALUATION NOTICE MN 55323 BALBOA MINNESOTA CO ATTN PRESIDENT 20221 PRAIRIE ST P 0 BOX 977 CHATSWORTH CA 91311 1985 ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE 41,300 PROPERTY ID 17-117-23 34 0008 ORONO 1985 CLASSICICATION VACANT LAND NONHOMESTEAI IF YOU HAVE GOOD REASON TO BELIEVE THAT EITHER YOUR VALUE OR CLASSIFICATION IS INCORRECT. YOU MAY CALL 473-1844 WITHIN THE NEXT 5 BUSINESS DAYS. IF NCcSSARY. AN APPOINTMENT CAN THEN BE MADE FOR YOU TO DISCUSS YOUR INFORMA- ION WITH AN APPRAISER/ASSESSOR. ITHE LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW IS SCHEDULED FOR MAY 30, 7 00 PM AT ART CENTER OF MINN AUDITORIUM TH= HENNEPIN COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION WILL MEET FOR TWO WEEKS =GINNING JULY 8, 1985. YOU MUST HAVE APPEARED AT TILE LOCAL BOARD OF rt=VIEW TO BE ELIGIBLE TO APPEAR BEFORE TH'c COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION. FOR AN APPOINTMENT TO APPEAR AT THE COUNTY BOARD YOU MAY CALL 348-5076 BY JULY 12. 1985. STAT= TAX COURT. STATE LAW PROVIDES THAT A PROPERTY OWNER CAN NOT APPEAL TO THE TAX COURT OR DISTRICT COURT FOR A REVIEW OF HIS OR HER ASSESSMENT UNLESS A TIMELY AFPEARANCE IN PERSON, BY COUNSEL OR BY WRITTEN COMMUNICATION HAS BEEN MADZ BEFORE THE LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW AND COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION. FCR INFORMATION ON THE TAX COURT CONTACT THE TAX COURT OFFICE, 444 LAFAYETTE ROAD, ST PAUL, MN, 55101. TELEPHONE 296-2806. n ( I 717 171 . June 5, 1985 Mayor Mary C. Butler and Councilpersons Lynn Adams, Timothy Adams, Thomas Fraham and James R. Grabek City Of Orono, Board Of Review 1335 South Brown Road P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota, 55323 Re: 997 Wildhurst Trail P.I.D. C7-117-23-21-0004 Dear Madam and Sirs: The purpose of this letter is to present to you our reasons for believing that the proposed estimated market value for our home as of January 2, 1985 is excessive. Our opinion is founded both on factual data and upon established legal principals. There are two .najor issues. First, what is the "fair market value" of our prriperty. Second, is the proposed"estimated market valud'an equal treatment of our property in comparison with other properties in Hennepin County. We moved into Minnesota in 1984. We signed a purchase agreement for this property on June 2, 198, and the transaction was closed and we received the deed to the property on July 9, 1984. While the size of our lot is ill feet by 656 feet, thEre is but 228 feet between the front of our lot and the channel. The balance of the depth of our lot is marsh land which lies across the channel, is in essence unbuildable, and is unuseable by us excep for vista -type purposes. Therefore, the useable portion of our property contains but slightly more than one-half acre. The prop- erty is served by public sewer, but our water supply is by means of our private well. The road which provides access to our property is a narrow gravel private road, which is in poor condition. We understand that numerous attempts have been made to have this road taken over by the City and improved, but that the City refuses to accept it. As it is a private road, the individual land owners must bear the expenses of maintaining it, plowing the snow from it, etc. This fact, of course, reduces the value of this property in comparison with other properties which are serviced by public roads and,/or have public water systems. Mayor Mary C. Butler and et. al. June 5, 1985 Page rwo As the basis for the estimated market value has two compo- nents (i.e. the value of the land and the value of the structures and other improvements on it), it must be pointed out that the value of an identically sized and located lot which is unimproved is greater than that of a lot with a structure already built upon it. The rea- son for the greater value of the "raw" land parcel is that the owner is free to place whatever type and size of structure on the property which is legally permissible, while the owner of a parcel which al- ready has a structure on it has those choices substantially curtailed. Therefore, it is not just to place the land value component of esti- mated market value based upon raw land sales unless a deduction is made for the loss -of -choice factor. Basically, the separate values of a piece of land and of a particular structure individually are greater than when those two components are together. There are three usually accepted approaches to arriving at "fair market value" which are used by appraisors. These are: (1) cost of construction less depreciation; (2) comparable sales; and (3) income generation. Of course, in owner -occupied residences the income approach has little value. The comparable sales approach is limited by the fact that no two properties are identical and, therefore, subjectively based adjustments must be made to approxi- mate the value of the differences. The cost of construction minus depreciation approach relies on averaging certain construction costs and factors which differ from contractor to contractor and upon the correct ascertainment of the deductions which are to be made in assessing both physical depreciation as well as functional depre- ciation. It can be seen by this brief analysis of the appraisors' approaches to value, that an appraisor's opinion as to value is just that, an opinion. It is not unusual for two or more qualified appraisors to arrive at different opinions as to value. These differences usually are relatively minor, perhaps plus or minus 5%, but they can be more substantial. Recent Minnesota Tax Court cases have stated that: "The very best evidence of market value is a recent arms -length crash sale of the subject property." In applying this case law, it must be remembered that the sale must be between persons who are willing buyers and sellers and that they are informed as to values and as to the property itself. If either the buyers or sellers are in a disadvantageous position, having timing or financial problems, the sale prise may be skewed. The same is true if either of the parties has some knowledge about the property which is not shared by the other. of course, if the buyers and sellers have a special relation- ship to each other the sale price is not necessarily a true indica- tion of value, which is the reason that the Tux Court•'s above -quoted language specifies that the sale must be arms -length. Mayor Mary C. Butler and et. al. June 5, 1985 Page Three Another important part of the Tax Court's language is that the sale is a "cash" sale. This criteria is meant to take into account the effect that the type of financing used has on the sales price. We are all aware of the effect that high interest rates have had on the housing market in recent years. If you were able to buy two identical items, one for $130,000.00 and had to pay 14% interest on that purchase for 20 years, and the other for $160,000.00 but only had to pay 8% interest for the 20 year tern, the $130,000.00 purchase would end up costing you a total of $312,000.00 while the $160,000.00 purchase would cost a total of $288,000.00. Therefore, the total cost of the $160,000.00 purchase would be $24,000.00 less than the total cost of the $130,000.00 purchase even though the original stated purchase price was $30,000.00 greater. Both the Court in its decisions on market value of properties and the Minnesota Legislature in its statutes on sales ratio studies compel the consideration of the factor of financing in arriving at values. The "estimated market value" of our property that we are requesting you to consider is applicable only to real estate, it does not apply to personal property that is contained in or on the property. The legal definition of personal property encompasses many items which are usually included in the sale of a home, even a number of items which are attached to the structure but which can be removed without damaging the structure. The reason that the standard purchase agreement contains a printed listing of such items as awnings, shades, drapery rods, lighting fixtures, water soft- eners, hot water tanks, television antenna, etc. are that these items are personal property and unless they are specified in that contract the seller is free to remove them as he has not sold them. The fact that they are usually included in the sale of the home does not change their status as personal property. Nor does the fact that they are usually included in the sale of a home mean that they are to be included in "estimated marker value" and thereby make them subject to ad valorem real estate taxes. The State of Minnesota repealed its' tax on personal property many years ago. It is our opinion that the "fair market value" of our home is approximately $128,000.00 of which $35,000.00 should be attributed to the land and $93,000.00 to the structure. The Lasis for our opinion i- as follows: a.) The property we purchased had been on the market for approximately 14 months prior to the time we signed a purchase agree- ment to buy it. This period of time was certainly sufficient to adequately test the market for it. Mayor Mary C. Butler and et. al. June 5, 1985 Page Four b.) We had not met nor had any connection with the sellers, Erik Lee Elstad and Jerielynn Ruth Elstad, before we viewed the house in the purchase process. We saw them but twice, at the viewing and at the closing, and we have not seen them since. The sale was handled through a realtor. It was an arms -length sale. c.) As we were moving into the area from out-of-state and needed a place to live, we, unfortunately, did not inspect the prop- erty as thoroughly as we should have. Since we purchased our home, we have become aware of a number of problems with the house which now make it apparent that we paid too much for this property. Sc-,e of these problems are: the roof vents are inadequate and havE caused moisture staining on the ceilings; there were no storm doors; the house n• ided painting both inside and outside; the roof raf!ers are under -sized for the span and the roof is now sagging; there is in- adequate insulation which causes increased heating and cooling ex- pe. es; in addition to the roof vent moisture problems, there are other moisture problems giving rise to mildewed u.-ji., ,3per and car- peting; there were no handrails on the staircases. d.) The personal property which was included in the sale was a water softener; two refrigerators; a 12 H.P. John Deere lawn tractor with a 36 inch mower attachment and a 42 inch snow blower attachment; a double oven/range; lighting fixtures and bulbs; car- peting; (1- peii_es and curtains; mirrors, garage door opener and dual cc 3, etc. The value of those items which was set forth on the icate Of Real Estate value which was executed at the closing .000.00. However, at that time we did not understand the legal ition of personal property and now that we are know- ledgablE i t area we believe that the value of the personal property ir, Aed in that sale was substantially higher. e.) The price we paid for this property, real and person- al, was $165,000.00, which consisted of the payment of $71,606.14 in cash and the assumption of the unpaid balance of a mortgage in the amount of $93,393.86. This mortgage had an interest rate of 8 3/4% which definitely made us willing to pay an appreciably higher price for the property than we felt it was worth. The fixed rate conventional mortgage rates at the time of our purchase was 14.75%. This 68 spread in interest rates over the remaining 23+ years of the term of the mor tge gave rise to a difference of $393.26 per month in payments a to a total of $110,112.80 over the remaining term of the mortgage. When one applies the mathematical formula to ascertain the "present value" (which is monetary equivalent of the amount of money it would require at the time of our closing to give rise to that total amounti the result is nearly $33,000.00. This calculation does not take into account the "points" we would Mayor Mary C. Butler and et. al. June 5, 1985 Page Five have had to have pa..i to secure a new mortgage at tiat time nor the higher closing costs which would have been incurred as the result of a purchase by means of a new mortgage. When these factors are totalled together, the economic advantage to us in being able to assume the existing mortgage was, in our opinion, in excess of $36,000.00. f.) While realtor's provide a valuable service and cost sales of real property have realtors involved, we are aware that when a transaction does not involve realtors the seller usually reduces the price by some percentage of the amount which would otherwise be paid in a selling commission. The real estate commis- sion in this transaction amounted to $11,550.00. In our opinion, the amount of the real estate commission should not be included in setting the "fair market value" of a property, even though it may be a necessary component in the vast majority of sales prices of real estate transactions. It is evident that when one subtracts the economic valve ^f all of the above -factors, the actual price which we paid is below our present opinion of the "fair market value" of $128,000.00. However, in arriving at our opinion we attempted to fairly asses the true market value not the lowest possible figure we could p- sent to you, even though we have a factual b,-,sis for a lower amp _-.t. Our challenge to the proposed "estimated market value" does not end, however, with a determination, or what the "fair mar- ket value" of our home is. There is the significant issue of equality of taxation. The Minnesota Constitution, the Minnesota statutes and the Minnesota court decisions require that all prop- erties be taxed equally. If all properties had an "estimated mar- ket value" equal to their "fair market valve:", the equality issues would not exist. However, this is not the case. The sales rat_t• studies, which have been prepared by the office of the Minnesota Commissioner Of Taxation, reveal th_it "estimated market value" is below the actual cash sale value. The Minnesota Tax Court and the Minnesota Supreme Court have consistently required that the "esti- mated market value" of a property, which is used for real estate tax purposes, he reduced from t:I,e "fair market value" of the prop- erty by the applicable sales ratio studies. "he most recently available sales ratio studies for Hennepin County weighted for type and percentages of property in each tax classification gives rise to an applicable percentage to be applied of 86.611. There- fore, according to law, the "estimated market value" of our property should be set at $111, 116.80, which could be rounded to $111, 100.00 or $111,200.00. Mayor Mary C. Butler and et. al. Tune 5, 19'5 Page Six We do appreciate that Rolf Erickson has recognizea that our property has been substantially ov:-r valued in the recent years. We are informed that in making his recent rernmmen(?ation as to "estimated market value", Mr. Erickson did nut take into ac^3 nt the vale ^f the financing factor nor the yua?..'y factor. We wish to thank you for taking the time to consider our position on this watter and trust that you wil.l agree that the proposed "estimated market value" is substantially higher than is justified by the facts and the law. Yours very traly, C- UES E . BOEHM t, ANN C. BOEHM cc: Mr. Mark Bernhardson Mr. Rolf Erickson PAGE E6 Il UN" C : at 0P.f"i1) SAC: C+G : [; _iFF: . cc PURCH-.CEr C.: c!i1LT x TYPE OF o LILDIING STREET SALE PI;CE. : C.CT. LAND AREA: !::,: FT 4.(C'=CP= "=ECG -iPE: OTHER FIN. LAKESHORE? LHr GROUWD FLOUR. __" T Fitr: C�.�C =�.�'_'_. -_:. 'jC CENTRAL AIR 2ND & 3RD FL.: C• r—''' of-C-1, kC GBA: �� c�:-:_'�- _ ,•, - -- - - - - T 0 T A L S FC:g- - - - - T 0 T F L c FO"- - - - - T 0 T A L : F0= - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a------ -- ---- ---- ----------- ------- --- - - - - -- .Ago*., -LE `— _[_^ I — — — — — — — — flM.4i _. 2r 0PC''a_' — — — — — — — — - - — — — — — — — — ,SE . 35 — — — — — — — — — _- - - - - -- GO: 34 --- - - - - -- - — — — — — — — — SUFFIX: 1. — — — — — — — — — PURCHASER AND, �E ^- r- r ----'; -;-- LDIt�G STREET ADDRESS CHEYEt, �E LAND COt":=:=:. ; _'` ; ± c: �• ; _ [' 0 10,35 ORONO Ur-HAR:: F: _ . r I c._ SALE PRICE: I I�OC+i'0 DST=: LAND AP.EA: (S2 FT '?.0B�,C-C= T;': - E: �tiFyPRh !J( DUE) LAKESHORE? LAKE NAMIE : GROUND FLOOR: 0 :: BSt1'T FIN: O.60 ;F'E=.: 0 t10 CE'd7F'AL AIR 2ND & 3RD FL.. i' B-THf: 00FU-.L 0-:/4 40-l'� 0 GB",: 8EDROCtMS -MA 1N: b OTHEF _..:. 0 GARAGE: 0 W.0 LIN.= ): H CO"ME":7'c - - - - - T 0 7 A L S FOR 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T O 7A L S FOR �,4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �. . Ft, E 103 c_E PROV'c.. i . MU41C: SE ORONO SEC: 36 GO: 41 f'1Ff��� aT.•y: t .C' PURCHASER AND LEC-, [t= - :< a T E CF 8U'. STREET ADDRES_ rP 1C1 CHEVY CHr-_L SALE PRICE: 4 luCti4 :•--c: -_ LAf:C> AREA. : B4'::7 �:. - "�c= ;. - - �?=A'i i '� DEcC LAKESHORE? N LAKE GROUND FLOOR: C Ec"'T F:.,, 0 ou O IPEFLFCES: +: _E';'^=! AIR 2ND & 3RD FL. L C-c "4 #C-1'2 C GBA: P :Ei�G '^P�'c-�'. .... G OTHER E+RS . 4 :-- . _ . _ 4T7 W.O.(LIN.FT.): e f'&A,-<Z7:- - - - - T 0 T A L S FOR e• - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - m PHOTO OF SUBJECT 11-LES S"Lt - --- - - - - -- VU411C: 38 ORO,40 - -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- SEC: 20 - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - 0 0 : 21 - - - - - - - - - _ — — — — — — — SUFFA a• 2 — — — — — — — — — 'rURCHASEF AN'D LEA 3""L :'EcCRIFT :0,1i i=4,F' ..U, t. TYPE OF BUILDING STREET ADDRE:f KOSKWICH jO EFH ,' MUF' 2i+ I17 14I0 Rk.;1ELE2460 SALE PRICE: i 40i+(1rk DJ,E: FEE;. IyE_' FIN.: LAIND AREA: C•c•D FT EE DPED TYPE: CONTR17 FOR DEED LAKESHORE% N L"KE t+AME: GROIRJD FLOOR: S •4 SSM T F!N: 0. G 0F?REFLACES: �� NO CENTRAL AIR 2ND & JRD FL 0 E4.; HS: #IF.'-L 0-2.'4 ##3-1.12 0 GBA: =_ EEGFC�i.11-NAit:: l C.,7H.E* eRE. 0 GARACE: • 1 G_T W.O.tLI+i.FT. C Ot "."E'47 S - - - T O 7 i, L :. F!= _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PHOTO OF S r 'E _T F4—Ly.(+� -_l. 17 i u . STREET ADCF'Eo•: PIEPER SL!= LAND ARE:,: 2`.-----=- LAKESHORE,, N L"t= GROUND FLOOR: _: 2ND & 3RD FL. W.0.(LIN.FT. ): t t-•AGE 6; �_-, E•UI X T',?= OF EUILDING T YFE: CON 1-r:,..T tOP DEED H G�PAGE: C+ TOTAL SFj;:.'------- - - - - -- -- --------------------- T 0 T A L S FOR 4.: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - m PHOT(I OF c ;I 1; 12-07 r ;'p-GE ; 3 SALE PP_"F' MUNI I C : 38 ORONO SEC: 4 00: 22 SUFFJX: 20 PUR04=SER AND LEGAL GE "r:--. ',. _.,N :'�+ILT & T•(FE OF STREET ADDRESS - CAMFION JMAE_ '+ 4 1;7 22 __ 1.;, 160 CYGNET Fi_AC=_ L:c: S'Jrii� !«,i._ ;[r•< SALE PRICE: t 110006 iN,?E: OC-. LAND AREA: ?CWS:, FT 0.0147-;E- 'SEED T2. WARP4 47 f DEE:) LAKESHORE? N LAkE tiAr'E: GROUND FLOOR: 1534 X 891 T FIN: 0.20 NFIREP?6ALE:: _ CENTRAL AIR 2ND & 3RD FL.: 0 BATHE: M1FULL #1-:/4 GBAi 1534 BEDROCtSS-M, Irj- 3 OTHE; BRS: i 3ARAGE: 2 ATT W.O.(LIN.FT.): 0 MIMENTS T 0 T :; L S FOR 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T G T F; L S FOR 22 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - •- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - f 16, PHOTO OF SUB EC SALE PROPERTY - - - - - - - 11Ut41 C : 38 ORONO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEC: 17 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GO: 34 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SUFFIX: 23 - - - - - - - - - PURCHASER AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION '(EHF' kUILT a TYPE OF BUILDING STREET ADDRESS RITTENOUR. MEF A W. 17 117 23 34 23 1984 SFL17 FOr ER 2255 NLAINE AVE. LIB1 NAVARRO SALE i ,CE: $ 9'.900 DATE: MAY 1984 FIN.: LAND AREA: 16b84SO FT 0.39ACRES GEED TYPE: OTHER FIN. LAKESHORE-' LAKE NAME: GROUND FLUOR: 953 '1. BSf1'T FIN: 0.50 #FIRE:PLACES: 1 CENTRAL AIR 2ND & 3RD FL.: 0 BATHS: NIFULL #1-3/4 00-1/2 8 GBA: 953 BEDROOMS -MAIN: 2 OTHER ORS: 0 GARAGE: 2 TUCK UNDER W.O.W- rT.): 6 COM; 1ENT S - - - T 0 T A L S FOR 23 - - - - - - - - - - - - - •- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I ow ter ♦ �, ' SALE PP.OPERTY - MUNI C : 3E ORONO _ - - - - - - - -- - - SEC: 7 - - - - - - - - SUFFIX: c) - - - - - - - - PUFC'4ASER AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION YEAR BUILT & TYPE OF BUILDIhG STREET ADDRF GROVER, KcVI1t 7 117 23 32 52 1960 c,PLIT LE'JEL 1315 REST Pv,. O.;D L"'3,72 . TONKAVIEW GARDENS SALE PRICE: # 7 3 o v 0 DATE: _ J . 1984 FIN.: L44D AREA: 3006050 FT 0.69ACRES DEED T'iPE: CONITRACT FOR GE.n LAKESHORE') N LAKE NAME: GROUND FLOOR: 1104 '; BSP1'T FIN: 0.50 NFIREPLALta: I NO CENTRAL AIR 2ND & 3RD FL.: 0 BATHS: NIFULL 00-3/4 N1-1!2 0 GBA: 1104 BEDROOMS -MAIN: 3 OTHER BRS; 1 GARAGE; 2 ATT W.O.(LIN.FT.): 0 CL MENTS T 0 T A L S FOR 52 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - f O 1 r, L S FOR 32 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 r � � I PH010 OF SULJEC T SALE PROPEPT , — —————— MUt4lC: 4 0PCIN0 _ f1w-. — — — — — — SEC: I 0 — — — — — — — — - - — — — — — O G : 24 — — — — — — — — - - — — — — — SUFFIX: I? — — — — — — — — — PURCHASER AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION YEAR BUILT A. TYPE OF BUILDING STREET ADDRESS KEEGAN. WILLIAM .•3 117 23 24 1' 1�6` SPLIT FGrER 1115 W1LL0t•J DRIVE SOUTH METES ACID BOUtt[PC SALE PRICE: ! 65,000 DATE: DEC. 1984 FIN.: LAND AREA: 496OOS0 FT 1.14ACRES DEED T;PE: CONTRACT FOR DEED LAKESHORE' LAKE NAME: GROWD FLOOR: 1196 BSt1'T FIN: 0.50 #FIREPLACES: 2 NO CENTRAL AIR 244D & 3RD FL.: 0 BATHS: 01;JLL #i-3'4 00-1'2 23 GSA: 1196 6EDROOtiS—MA ItJ: 3 OTHER BRS: I GARAGE: 2 TUCK UtJDER W.O.!LIN.FT. a : 0 COMMENTS 7 0 T A L = FOR 17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - - T 0 T A L S FOR 24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - PHOTO OF SUBJE k,,- SkLE PROPEPT'r - - - - - - - MLM I C : 38 ORONO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEC : 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UCH: 42 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UFFIX: 29 - - - - - - - - - PURCHASER AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION YEAR BUILT & TYPE OF BUILDING STREET ADDRESS THOMSON JANICE M & STEVE 20 117 23 42 29 1977 SPLIT LEVEL 3525 IVY PLACE L2B1 IVY ESTATES ACC TO PLAT SALE PRICE: 3 125000 DATE: JUNE 1984 FIN.: LAND AREA: 20500SO FT 0.47ACRES DEED TYPE: WARRANTY GEED LAKESHORE? LAKE NAME: GROLND FLOOR: 1352 X BSM'T FIN: 2` #FIREPLACES: 2 CENTRAL AIR 2ND & 3RD FL.: 0 BATHS: #1FULL #1-3/4 41-1112 0 GBA: 1352 BEDROOMS -MAIN: 3 OTHER BRS: 0 GARAGE: 2 ATT W.O.(LI`J.FT.): 7 COMENTS - - - T 0 T A L S FOR 29 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T 0 T A L S FOR 42 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 PHOTO OF ;Ub lEr T i 4 a-A2 SALE PFOPERT'i MWIC: 38 OFONO SEC: 31 00: 23 SUFFIX: y PURCHASER AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION STREET ADDRESS GMEINER JAMES G & KATHLE 31 118 23 23 9 420 DEBORAH DRIVE L6B2 MCCULLEY FARM SALE PRICE: s 249000 DATE: JAN. 1985 LAND AREA: 217800SO FT 5.00ACRES LAKESHORE? LAKE NAME: GROUND FLOOR: 2156 X. BSM'T FIN: 0.70 OFIREPLACES: 2 2ND & 3RD FL.: 0 BATHS: N2FULL N1-314 M2-1/2 GBA: 2156 BEDROOMS -MAIN: 2 OTHER BRS: 2 W.0.(LIN. FT.): 3 COMMENTS YEAR BUILT & TYPE OF BUILDING 1981 SPLIT LE')EL FIt4. DEED T r PE : IJARRN!.TY DEED NO CENTRAL AIR 3 GARAGE: 3 ATT T 0 T A L S FOR 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T 0 T A L S FOR 23 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T 0 T A L S FOR 31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .nor . FHOTO OF SUBJECT AW SALE PPOPEPT t11_R�i(. ��: is •�r� - - - - - - - - - CIO: 41 — — — — — — — — — =.1;FF . c — — — — — — — — — PUPCHmSER At1[) LE:+,� .�..�.� I_.. E.-9 EUILT 1. T,FE CF EUIL[ING STREET :' ["DRES PETEPSC44. CH*-PLE .i-414ET 11t : ? a; _ 1'+12 125 825 OLD LONG L", E SALE PP10E: I F'50(+C+ D.,TE: HUG1:_ti FIN.: LAUD ARE,: 195000SC, FT 4.48 CFE: GEE[, T'(PE: CC(4+F"C7 FOR DEED LAKESHORE % N LAF'.E t+"I'_ : GROLUD FLOOR: 7;2 E '1 T FIN: e NCI r-EIIT,'4L AIF Z441) ND FL. s 115a E:kTHcZ N;F!ILL 2 GSA: cap. E.EDGOCd1t.-MAIIJ: C.«aF:«;GE: 1 ['ET W.O.(LIN.FT. ); t• rOVIEtJTE. __:L; Er . r • - - - - T 0 T A L S FOR 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T D T H L S FOR 4: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - #- - TOTAL _ FOR c`. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -:-121-07 MUNI C 2, C, R C, SEC. 5. GO: Z-LIF; I PURCHASER AN'L E F: STREET ADDRESS BARTLETT JEF----".. f SALE PRICE: I ' ,A7E LAND AREA: 2875 'OSC- F7 LAKESHORE',, N L 4 ", E t tAll I E GROUND FLOOR: 106.2 ',. 6SM'T F!,',,: R E F'-',-' E 2ND & 3RD FL.; 2,! 5 &,7HS: C, L GBA: 1321,11 El E D P 0 0111, cl 1,1;4. 7 N r,7,-E; :.p W.O.(LIN.FT.): C C C ",V 1EN7 PAGE 17 ."E,c-UlL7, & T(F,E Ci;: PUILDIN'r., 19 SF-1 1 1 / 4 S 7 J." F­ ( TYPE: �JA';,AtJY DEE"- NO CENTRAL AIR I GAFAGE: I DE7 T 0 7 A L S FOR 4: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T 0 T A L S FOF 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - M PHE170 OF SUEJEC-1 EC : - no : -'' S11FI -- - L; c'URNASEc ;:' - - •'E _ Fi . -=- - —_ ---- F.11: fl,e(1 C:� _—.G_. .c''-- ._ :� i 4 T A L S F)G 4; - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • - - - T 4 T :, L 5 F GF : _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - C' 7 ra L S F G'r.' ? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r f l,--• � t _, c_ 1, j SALE PROPERT', - - - - - - - MUNIC: 38 ORONO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEC: 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 00: 21 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SUFFIX: 12 - - - - - - - - - PURCHASER AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION YEAR BUILT & TYPE OF BUILDING STREET ADDRESS DOBSON, EBEN & SONJIA 3 117 23 21 12 1982 1 1/2 STORY 2225 DEVIN LANE L7B1 THE NURSERY SALE PRICE: $ 240000 DATE: NOV. 1984 FIN.: LAND AREA: 148000SO FT 3.40ACRES DEED TYPE: WARRANTY DEED LAKESHORE? LAVE NAME GROUND FLOOR: 1822 BSM'T FIN: 0.75 #FIREPLACES: 2 CENTRAL AIR 2ND & 3RD FL.: 911 BATHS: N3FULL 00-3/4 #0-1/2 0 GBH: 2733 BEDROOMS -MAIN: 2 OTHER ORS: 2 GARAGE: 2 ATT W.Q.(LIN.FT.): 6 COMMENTS - - - T 0 T A L S FOR 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T 0 T A L S FOR 21 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E I 'l� mom 1 LM PHOTO OF SUBJECT u 7 - - - - - - - - PURCHASER ANC. STREET ADDPE:, - 0 HLIN .* C : "i S CIFNI-I - - - - - - - - - c EEC: I — — — — — — — — — GO: 44 - - - - - - - - - OrFl e : '74 - - - - - - - '" : ;: -, c- � " ; - " " - -r- - -_, j' 1- 7. & 7 1 P E C F E U I L D I t d G 7 2 S SALE PF:CE: I :p4l E 1%" 7 LA14D APZ,: 7,1 FE 'EED LAKESHCRE GROUND FLOOR: E F i'.': 3 . 0 0 t'Cl CEf47PkL AIR 2ND & 3RD FL. #CIFLILL #0-12 4 C, 6#4 1 7 0 - , C, 7 HT T C) T A L S FOR 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 0 T A L S FOR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T C, 7 A L S FCIF •- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - rIGE 64 MLA41 C Z 0 R SEC: 17 00: PURCH.;SE.;, EC —, F" YEAR PLIM 7)PE OF BUILDING ST R E E 7 t4. D r E L I NEI L, U 5TCRv' SALE F9lr-E: S 4 LAND AREA: C (I e. E ,!EE-L) T,;E: CONTRoA71 FO� DEED LAKESHORP L r, E :«4', E GROLIND FLOOF: 1 2 A S F NO CENTRAL AIR 2ND & 3RD FL 5�4 H c. GSA: E E 0 0 W.A C E 0 NONE W. Cl. ( L IN.;:7 i, 7 C, 7 r L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -AA a L - _ - _ SEC: 24 CG: 22 - - - - SUFFIX: } PURCH"SEn' LE- FANSLER (.... - -74 SALE PRICE: .e`ar. .`r—E: rip 't LA14D AREA : = - _ .:. FT _ - F.c. LAKESHORE? N 1- GROLVD FLOCK: ': 8SM'T Flh; i+~ 2ND & 3RD FL.. C., BATHS: #2Fi-!L a4-2. �i #1-l• - GBA: s84C. EEDF0Ck1S-t":,j' , 0 0THE;, Etc. _ W.0.�L1t4.FT.): 8 COMMEt:TS ':hGE 45 C EUILT n 7YFE OF Eu'_UING 9$4 1 2/4 STORi F., .:; . . liEE TYPE: COfJ-rRAC; FOR DEED CENTRAL AIR 2 GE : 2 ATT - - - T 0 T A L S _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T 4 T A L cl F_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T 0 T A L S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WI t ,IC 7 U OF SUBJEC7 PURCHASER AND STREET P.N.AE_c G-_2 .7 U.IIC: 38 0F.,Cr--- - - - - - - SEC: Q--------- 00: 44 - - - - - - - - - F1%: E - - - - - - - - - LEx•L-_:,C:.;-... _ --- .l-,:_T T`iPE CIF e. U i! b : t 4 G ALL EN RICHh-rG 11 3 4 ='6500 EAGLE Pul SALE FR:CE: 4 ._°,:i.t I_ -, „:'.E LAFID ARE:;:.E_: -,PE. LJAPP N . DEED LAKESHORE % LAKE GROLND FLOOF.: 2?:1 P:'!'T F:!J: #FIFEPLACES: - CENTRAL AIAR.. 2ND & 3RD FL.. 12:2 E�TrS: 0:,;:V.L 0. GE' -A: 39E 9E[)Rml04S -!!A!N: GTrER :.'F E: 2 ATT W.0 L14N.FT.i: C Cce'It 1EI - - - - 7 0 T A L 3 FOR, 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T O T A L S FOR 44 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T 0 T A L S FOR S - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 I PH070 OF '_ _F :i. i.Eh'1 t1Uir:_ �: fJRJivt� SEC: 3 GG: 33 SUFF1)(: G PURCHASER AND LEGAL 1)ESCF 1CN STREET ADDREE: LAMLIN ELiC-E:!7-i !, t,E_'_Ci .3 117 23 33 d 740 W1LLO:,! ;F:1''E 'C'.T'r. L:lE:; WEEB SALE PRICE: z 1 @708C DATE 1464 LAND AREA: 453e2SO FT I.C4:;CRES LAKESHORE? N L*CE 14AME : GROUND FLOOR: 8 -e BSti'T FIN: 0.75 NFIREPLACES: 2 2No & 3RD FL., 6d.., BATHS: #IFL:LL #.-3:'+ 00-1 "2 GBA: 177C OEDROCMS-MAIN: @ OTHER PRS: 3 W.O.<.L]N.FT.): COti'1ENTS 'IEHR BUILT & TYPE OF BUILDING 1?%8 TWO Z*'TOR`( =:tt.. _ ?YPE : COtrTRkC , FOR GEED NO CENTRAL AIR. GARAGE: @ - - --T-CI-T-A-L-•-F- -`- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T 0 T A L SFOrt PHOTn OF SijP,lrrT SALE PROPEPTY - - - - - - MM I C : 38 ORONO - - - - - - - SEC: 3 -- - - - -- GO: 22 -- -- --- SUFFIX: 7 PURCHASER A14D LEGAL DEfiCP.IPTION STREET ADDRESS PHILLIPS DONNA & JERRY 3 117 23 22 7 2275 LONGVIEW CIRCLE SOUT L381 LONGVIEW SALE PRICE: A 220000 DATE: JAN. 1985 LAND AREA: 91476SO FT 2.10ACRE8 LAKESHORE? N LAKE NAME: GROUND FLOOR: 1345 BSM'T FIN: 0.75 #FIREPLACES: 1 2ND & 3RD FL.: 1320 BATHS: #2FULL N1-3.-4 01-1'2 GBA: 2665 BEDROOMS -MAIN: 0 OTHER BRS: W.O.(LIN.FT.): 4 CO VENTS YEAR BUILT & TYPE OF BUILDING 1980 TWO STORY FIN,: DEED T`rFE: WARRANTY DEED CENTRAL AIR 23 GARAGE: 3 ATT T 0 T A L S FOR 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T 0 T A L S FOR 22 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T 0 T A L S FOR 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - s , f PHOTO OF SUBJECT I - - 1• -1 r •_ •_ _ - •_ _ - - .. LAND APEA: SROUND FLOOF.: '2{� :: Fit:, W.O.tLIN. =T. _ T G i - 1, I .wl -T 1 :4. -C-, MLCJIC: 36 0R0!IC SEC: 00: ' ? :UFF:.. FURCHASER LE,"L 2-ES .z 7_ . STPEET ADDRE:•: SALE PRICE: LAND AREA: 60- -::Cl FT :.52kC=E LAKESHORE7 N : GROUND FLOOR: 30Ci+ E:•tA, -'-r 1t:' i`.. 2ND & 3RD FL.. 30 iC E»-TF;= . -.'LL y t; -. _ - GSA: E0E(+ cC_,FI'.r-1•=-h!r;:. _ :_r_� =_ - • _ W.C.(LIN.F7.): r'.{JE i Est'• E}SILT & "TYPE OF SUIL Di.": : =7C 71t:o E-0- 1 -ED 7'(PE. WAPP40iT'i DEED r- ENT FA L A I R C GAPA. GE : 3 ATT - - T 0 T a L S FOR . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T C' T L S ;OR ?: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - F Hr, ( - - - - SEC: 2i+ - - GO: 24 - - - S C F I : 41 STREET h;GF�c'c L U C•!L 'z- z- SALE _. C. LAND ARE LAKESHORE , Y L--� _ - 't : CARMANS BAY GROMD FLOOR: °-- ;:r - ;:;�;: #F1FEPL_'CES: 2ND & 3RD FL.:r'�4c. GBA: _ _ t.F- L.G,_ . •�_.�r=. C4 iliiyEn C'n': . i W.0.(LIN.FTC:, El:ia PAGE 76 EAR BUILT & TYPE OF EVILDING I '?4A F0:!A LER F i':. . DEED i FE: CN rCT Finn DEED NO CE147PAL AIR 8 GArAGE: u TOTAL S FC'F 4: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ;HGTO G- SUEJECT OROIJO - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- SEC: B-- - - - - -- - U�?: :4 - - - - - - - - - _ le — — — — — — — — — PURCHASER AND cUIL' TYPE OF BUILDING' STREET ADDRESS VAN Pc"E LAND AREA t _. : Ect, TY r E : 4.-iGn LAKESHORE" Y Lc ",E: CRYSTAL BAY GROLCJD FLOOR: 'JL' CE':TRG:. AIR 2rJD & 3RD Fl.: c' GBA: i+ ._: :. _.. 'E� E:�:'S. Q _�FAiE. 0 W.0.(LIN. FT. ,. T0 T A L S F i R A.-' - -- -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T 0 T A L S FOR 34 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r 0 PHOTO OF .U;.,JSLT ;rl� SEC: 1' F'URlii.,.C^. t: :'V; L'r tt 7'(FL ��r E J: L:',�'`. STREET ADVE 3: SIAKEL RINAR:' j SPLIT EP:"-. 3325 CR'(ST.:L E- SALE PRICE: % _.ter. --, - LAND ARth: 311i;.¢:r - :rEi% TrFt: .ThE4 LAKESHORE? Y LAKE t..-.-E ; CRYSTAL BAY GROLND FLOOR: 10E•a -. =1t:: 'S... �F.c.--L-•_E_; ; CENTRAL AIR 2ND & 3RD FL.s GBA.I Gr,F:r=GE. 1 TUCK LR:Gt"r^. W.O.tLIN.FT.i: - - - T 0 7 A L = F:_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A fMVIV V* 'SLrOtLI -8. SALE PROPERT( - - - - - - MUN1 C : 38 ORONO - - - - - - - - - - - - -- SEC: 7--- - - - - -- - - - - - - - GO: 31 - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- SUFFIX: 8--- - - - - - - PURCHASER AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION YEMR BUILT x TYPE OF BUILG1115 STREET ADDRESS VIGANTS BEVERLY A' WONVI 7 117 23 31 8 1951 RAMBLER 4496 NORTH SHORE DRIVE L1x2 BERGOUIST'S 2ND ADDITION SALE PRICE: $ 145000 DATE: NO'd. 1984 FIN.: LAND AREA: 25000SO FT 0.57ACRES DEED TYPE: WARRANTY DEED LAKESHORE? Y LAKE NAME: Forest Lake GROUND FLOOR: 1128 BStl'T FIN: 0.90 #FIREPLACES: 2 CENTRAL AIR 2ND & 3RD FL.: 0 BATHS: #IFULL 01-3/ 4 110-112 0 GSA: 1128 BEDROOMS -MAIN: 1 OTHER BRS: 3 GARAGE: 2 ATT W.O.(LIN.FT.): 5 COMMENTS T 0 T A L S FOR 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T 0 T A L S FOR 31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T0 T A L S FOR , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - •- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PHOTO OF =U1: FE -T SALE PROPERTY - - - - - - - !•+iMd1C: 38 ORONO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEC: 21 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 00: 24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SUFF]"! 33 - - - - - - - - - PURCHASER AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION YEAR BUILT & TYPE OF BUILDING STREET ADDRESS FIEBELKOFt4 J0144 L 17 23 24 33 1?72 SPLIT FOYER 2730 SHADYWOOD ROAD .CT C RLS#420 SALE PRICE: $ 268850 DATE. uEC. 1?84 FIN.: LAND AREA: 17424SO FT 0.40ACRES DEED TYPE: WARRANTY DEED LAKESHORE? Y LAFE WE: Lafayette Bay GROUND FLOOR: 1768 X WV T FIN: 0.75 #FIREPLACES: 2 CENTRAL AIR 214D & 3RD FL.: 0 BATHS: #1FULL #1-:-14 #0-1!2 3 GBA: 1768 BEDROOMS -MAIN; 2 OTHER BRS: 1 GARAGE: 3 ATT W.0.CL114.FT. 7: 4 COh1r4ENTS - - - T 0 T A L S FOR 33 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PHOTO OF SU6.fECT . %we SALE PROPERTY - - - - - - - - MUN 1 C : 38 ORONO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEC: 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 00: 1? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SUFFIX: 13 - - - - - - - - - PURCHASER AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION YEAR BUILT & TYPE OF BUILDING STREET ADDRESS BAUMAN, JOAN & ROBERT 8 117 23 13 13 1972 RAMBLER 1040 TC44KAWA ROAD AUD SUB. # 217 SALE PRICE: $ 265000 DATE: OCT. 1984 FIN.: LAND AREA: 94250S0 FT 2.16ACRES DEED TYPE: CONTRACT FOR DEED LAKESHORE? Y LAKE NAME: Maxwell Bay GROUND FLOOR: 1968 % BSM'T FIN: 0.00 #FIREPLACES: 2 CENTRAL AIR 2ND & 3RD FL.: © BATHS: #1FULL #2-3/4 #1-1/2 3 GBA: 1968 BEDROOMS -MAIN: 3 OTHER BRS: 1 GARAGE: 3 ATT W.0.(LIN. FT.) 4 COMMENTS - - - - T 0 T A L S FOR 13 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T 0 T A L S FOR 13 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PHOTO OF SUBJECT SALE PROPERTY - - - - - - - - MLINIC: 38 ORONO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEC: 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 00: 34 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SUFFIX: 16 - - - - - - - - - PURCHASER AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION YEAR BUILT of ?,(PE OF BUILDING STREET ADDRESS HAGFORS CURTIS C 8 117 23 34 16 1='S� PP416LER 1412 BALDUR PARK ROAD L1261 BALDUR PARK, SALE PRICE: 3 65000 DATE: DEC. 1?84 FIN.: LAND AREA: 12000SO FT 0.28ACRES DEED TYPE: CONTRACT FOR DEED LAKESHORE'� Y LAKE NAME: North Arm GROUND FLOOR: 600 BSM'T FIN: 0.00 #FIREPLACES: 0 NO CENTRAL AIR 2ND & 3RD FL.: 0 BATHS: #OFULL #1-3/4 #0-1:2 0 GSA: 600 BEDROOMS-MHiN: 1 OTHER BRS: 0 GARAGE: 1 GET W.O.tLIN.FT.): 0 CMMENTS - - - - T 0 T H L S FOR 1a - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T 0 T A L S FOR '24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A i PHOTO OF ''BJEf 1 SALE PROPERTY - - - - - - MU14I C : 38 OPC440 - - - - - SEC: 8 - - Go: 31 - - - - - - - SUFFIX: PURCHASER AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION STREET ADDRESS WEIHE WENDY L 8 117 23 31 5 1376 BALDUR PARK. ROAD L20FART216 BALDUR PARK SALE PRICE: $ 111000 DATE: DEC. 1984 LAND AREA: 13100SO FT 0.30ACRES LAKESHORE? Y LAKE NAME: North Arm CROWD FLOOR: 1104 BSM'T FIN: 0.75 #FIREPLACES: i 2ND & 3RD FL.: 0 BATHS: #2FULL 00-3.:4 0-1:2 GBA: 1104 BEDROOMS -MAIN: 1 OTHER BRS: 3 W.O. (LIN.FT.) : 5 COMMENTS YEAR BUILT & T`(PE OF BUILDING 1959 RAMBLER FIN.: DEED TYPE: i.JAP.RANTY DEED NO CEWR L AIR 0 GARAGE: 2 DET - - - - 0 T A L cl FOR 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T O T A L S FOR 31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T O T � L S FOR 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - t PHlirci OF SUE-JECT 9 0 PURCHASER AND STREET ADDRESS SALE PROPERTY MUN I C : 38 ORONO - - - - - - - - - SEC: 5 - - - - - - - - - 00: 34--- - - - - - - SUFFIX: 4 - - - - - - - - - LEGAL DESCRIPTION YEAR BUILT "< TYPE OF BUILD11IG FISHER, ANN C 5 117 23 34 9 1950 PAMBLER 774 TOt4KAWA ROAD L14 ETC PARTEN'S POINT FIRST DIV SALE PRICE: i 108000 DATE: AUG. 1984 FIN.: LAND AREA: 16000SO FT 0.37ACRES DEED TYPE: CONTRACT FOR DEED LAKESHORE? Y LAKE NAME: Stubbs Bay GROUND FLOOR: 616 % BSM'T FIN: 0.75 NFIREPLACES: 1 NO CENTRAL AIR 2ND & 3RD FL.: 0 BATHS: MIFULL #1-3/4 NO-1/2 0 GBA: 616 BEDROOMS -MAIN: 3 OTHER BRS: 0 GARAGE: 2 DET W.O.(LIN.FT.): 28 COMMENTS 37500 , 32322.04 8% T O T A L S FOR 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T 0 T A L S FOR 34 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T O T A L S FOR 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PHOTO OF SUBJECT :ALE PROPERTY - - - - - - - - 11UN I C : 38 ORR40 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEC: 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 00: 44 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SUFFIX: 14 - - - - - - - - - PURCHASER AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION YEAR BUILT & TYPE OF BUILDING STREET ADDRESS BRICKLEY WILLIAM G 7 117 23 44 14 14'15 1 1/2 STORY 4105 HIGHWOOD L16 HIGHWOOD SALE PRICE: $ 95000 DATE: DEC. 1984 FI.14.: LAND AREA: 9500SO FT 0.221'-CRES DEED TYPE: CONTRACT FOR DEED LAKESHORE? N LAKE NAME: West Arm GROUND FLOOR: 528 Y BSM'T FIN: 0.00 #FIFCPLACES: 0 NO CENTRAL AIR 2ND & 3RD FL.: 264 6„THS: #]FULL q0-314 0(4-1:2 13 GBA: 792 BEDROOMS -MAIN: 0 OTHER BRS: 2 GARAGE: 1 CET ►�.0.(LI14.FT. : 0 COMMENTS T 0 T A L El FOR 14 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r, I.M. PHOTO OF SUEJECT KJtwwrICE ART CENTER OF ~30 i 4, ►Mold W-by Ytven that the Coy Courlcx CtwP*Wjet t2q in ft COLWq by. durle 10. 19", 7 dossD m'n on Mm. w e■nrtalpr, a eentt.ry eww to condo to tfn Art Carr« rr," Lp d-crl0/d ae toiowa TIy 9oulh ►set of Mn em 474.6 het of te 'WO Lot d. $1000 n 10 T 1171123Yrtr ,As 21hu S. Mock 3. Makvft Addltbrand , Sac iron 10 T117 pWW neeob. rl/nnep„ Cax11y Mrr- A mW of sty rlliurt roe ere lh the City aMlou "",WNW lk-A nae hare. AM Dpe1eahed ktft D t we e ti10 Oft t e, ffle 1MM. COY dark tRrewt»d in The L&%& e1d The 21 Plor,�, ULy end M@V 2s. 1�1 Affidavit :vf Publi Otion State of Minnesota. County of Hennepin. B(II Holm, being duly sworn, on oath says that he is an authorized agent and-;mployee of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER. Mound, Min- nesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below. A.) The newspaper has complied with all the re- quirements constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended B.) The printed which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was prir!ed and published once each week for y successive weeks It was first published Tuesday. the day of 19 and was thereafter printed and published every Tuesday, to and including Tuesday, the jf day of **Y . 19 8 Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to me on this Q 23 day of ^41Y 19 u j By NGtoy P4itc Cyr f IIe� Nl�r�w (1 ) Lowell d ii0lidred r ate pWd by comreacrai users tpr � ornparable epics Ib 90 per mcm (21 Ma>tenum rate aloweA by law NX above MOW Si 13 taw rnc;h 131 Nate actually ihaf Wd to above mattes Sr 13 �wv u�1r E'Kh ackfrtrcxral suc(:essr.e nee* S "_% Per 'rkh CITY OF ORONO PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION ART CENTER OF MINNESOTA Notice is hereby given that the City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chambers at 1275 Brown Road South on Monday, June 10, 1985, at 7:00 P.M. to consider the extension of sanitary sewer to the Art Center of Minnesota. Legally described as follows: The South 459 feet of the east 474.5 feet of Government Lot 5, Section 10 T117 R23W and Lots 2 thru 6, Block 3, MarkviIle Addition, Section 10 T117 R23W Hennepin County, Minnesota. A copy of the feasibi 1 ity report is on f i le in the City of f ices during normal business hours. All persons wishing to be heard in reference to the proposed project will appear at this time. By Order of the City Council /s/ Dorothy M. Hallin City Clerk To be published in the Laker and the Pioneer newspapers the week of May 20 and May 27, 1985. CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO ) I, Dorothy M. Hal lin, City Clerk, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify tha` a Notice of Public Hearing concerning extending -_sanitary _sewer to the Art Center of was mai ed to the attached fist of property owners on May 20_, 1985 In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 20th day of 'ffdfothy M. a111n, City Clerk (SEAL) Mailing List Art Center of Minnesota P.O. Box Crystal Bay, MN 55323 COUNCIL MEETING JU-N 101985 TO: Mayor and C i t Council CITY OF ORONO FROM: Mark Bernhardson City Administrator t* DATE: June 5, 1985 SUBJECT: Crystal Bay Sewer Project Overview The following memo is to serve as a digest of staff recommer'at ions regarding the various items for the Crystal Bay pro je t. the meeting June 10 h. The numbering on each of the items o correspond with the number on the agenda. 2. Sale of Bonds- Following the Board of Review the Council will receive the opened bond bids at which point Carolyn Drude of Ehlers and Associates will recommend award and passage of resolution. 3. Art Center of Minnesota - Due to a publication error we had to republish for the public hearing and will go through the process regarding whether project 85- 2 will be ordered as pa t of 85-1 and secondly the number of units assigned to the Art Center. A. Staff recomme inclusion of the Art Center in the project as inG zed by the Council at their May - th meeting. B. It is a staff recommendation that 10 assessment units be assigned to the Art Center. 16. Staff recommends passage of resolu'ions which will combine what are present single parcels into assessment units with the attendent structure that is on the land. Additionally recommend passage regarding multiple assessment units on selected properties. Art Center - 10 Tonka Transmission - 1 1950 Shoreline Drive - 2 Sailor's World - 2 City properties - 5 17a. E�xment Schedule - It is staff's recommendation to levy payment schedule be done in equal principals with varying interest totals. b. Pro ect Interest Rate - It is recommended that the Fcujeui rate— charged on the assessment be 1.251 above the net interest rate of the bondF. (With the total founded to the nearest tenth of a p rcent.) c. S read on Assessments - it is staffs recomme.•ndat ion that assessments units be spy -ad in the manner outlined on the roll and in part reflected in agenda item 16. By spreading these assessments it will set a date certain by which appeals now have to be filed and that process can be commenced. 18. *Easments gained to date requiring resolution approval. 19. Community Development Block Grant Programs - At present the staff is developing programs for both payment of assessment and also hookups. Given that no hookup commitments can be -lone until this fall that program will not be functional until such time. Regarding the assessments, the program will need to be in place prior to initial collections of the first assessments next May. Attached is a memo outlining the program development to date. 20. Senior Citizen Deferment - In accordance with directien from Coencil last time staff is recomr--nding approval of the attached resolution for guidei.nes for deferment. COUNCIL MEMINO Extract of Minute= of Meeting of the City Council of the City of Orono Hennepin Cou:,ty, Minnesota J UN 101985 CITY OF ORONO Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of orr-.no, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall in the City, on Monday, June 10, 1985 at 7:00 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: and the following were absent: The Mayor announced that the meeting was con ied for the purpose of considering bids for the purchase of $900,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1985, as advertised for sale. The City Clerk presented affidavits showing publication of the :-,atice of sale in the official newspaper and in Commercial West, which affidavits were examined and found satisfactory and ordered placed on file. The Finance Director then presented the bids received prior to 4:00 o'clock P.M. and opened by the Finance Director pursuant to the notice of sale for the General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1985. These were examined and found to be as follows: Name of Bidder Interest Rates Purchase Price -1- Member introduced the following written resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AWARDING SALE OF $900,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1985, FIXING THE FORM AND SPECIFICATIONS THEREOF, PROVIDING FOR THEIR EXECUTION AND DELIVERY AND LEVYING TAXES FOR THEIR PAYMENT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The bid of to purchase the $900,000 Genera] Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1985 of the City as advertised for sale is hereby found and determined to be the best bid received pursuant to advertised notice of sale, and shall be and is hereby accepted, said bid being to purchase Bonds bearing interest as follows: Maturitv date Interest rate at a price of $ plus accrued interest. 2. To provide permanent financing for Project No. 85-1 consisting of sanitary sewer improvements for the Crystal Bay area, the City shall forthwith issue its negotiable General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1985 in the aggregate principal amount of $900,000, to be dated July 1, 1985, to bear interest at the rates above set forth, payable January 1, 1986 and semiannually thereafter or. January 1 and July 1 in each year, and to mature serially on January 1 in the years and amounts as follows: $50,000 in 1987 to 1992, $60,000 in 1983 to 1997, and $75,000 in 1998 to 2001, all years inclusive, all Bonds maturing on or after January 1, 1996, being subject to redemption and prior payment in whole or in part in inverse order of maturity and by lot within a maturity at the option of the City on January 1, 1995, and any interest payment date thereafter -2- at par and accrued interest. In the event of redemption by lot of Bonds of like maturity, the Bond Registrar shall assign to each Bond of such maturity then outstanding a distinctive number for each $5,000 of the principal amount of such Bonds and shall select by lot in the manner it determines the order of numbers, at $5,000 for each number, for all outstanding Bonds of like maturity. The order of selection of Bonds to be redeemed shall be the Bonds to which were assigned numbers so selected, but only so much of the principal amount of each Bond of a denomination of more than $5,000 shall be redeemed as shall equal $5,000 for each number assigned to it and so selected. The Bonds shall be numbered from R-1 upwards in order of issuance or in such other order as the Registrar may determine and shall be in the denomination of $5,000 each or any integral multiple thereof not exceeding the amount maturing in any year. 3. The Bonds, the Registrar's Authentication Certifi- cate, the form of assignment and the City Clerk's Certificate on the reverse side thereof shall be in substantially the followng form: No. R- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BOND OF 1985 Rate Maturity Date of Original Issue CUSIP July 1, 1985 The City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, for value received, hereby promises to pay to or registered assigns, the principal sum of dollars ($ ) on the maturity date specified above, without option of prior payment, upon the presentation: and surrender hereof, and to pay to the registered owner hereof interest on such principal sum at the interest rate specified above from July 1, 1985, or the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been Paid or duly provided for ds specified below, on January 1 and July 1 of each year, commencing January 1, 1986, until said principal sum is paid. Principal is payable in lawful money of the United States of America at the office of , as Bond Registrar or of its successor as Bond Registrar designated by the City upon 60 days notice to the registered owners at their registered addresses. Interest shall -3- be paid on each January 1 and July 1 interest payment date by check or draft mailed to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day of the month preceding each interest payment date (whether or not a business day) at said person's address set forth on the registration books maintained by the Bond Registrar. Any such interest not punc- tually paid or provided for will cease to be payable to the owner of record as of such regular record dates and such defaulted interest may be paid to the person in whose name this Bond shall be registered at the close of business on a special record date for the payment of such defaulted interest established by the Bond Registrar. For the prompt and full payment of such principal aril interest as the same become due the full faith, credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. Additional provisions of this Bond are contained on the reverse side hereof and such provisions shall for all purposes have the same effect as if set forth here. This Bond is one of an issue of bonds in the aggregate principal amount of $900,000, all of like date and tenor, except as to maturity, redemption privilege and interest rate, issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the Constitution and Laws of the State of Minnesota, including Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, for the purpose of defraying the expenses incurred and to be incurred in corr.A-t:on with Project No. 85-1 of the City, consisting of sewer ovements; and this Bond is payable primarily from taxes levied and special assessments to be levied from its Improvement Bonds of 1985 Fund, but constitutes a general obligation of the City; and to provide moneys for the prompt and full payment of said principal and interest as the same become due the full faith and credit of the City is hereby irrevocably pledged, and the City will levy additional ad valorem taxes on all taxable property in the City, if required for such purpose, without limitation as to rate or amount. The Bonds of this series maturing on or after January 1, 1996, are subject to redemption at the option of the City, in whole or in part in inverse order of maturity and by lot within a maturity, on January 1, 1995 and any interest payment date there- after at par and accrued interest. Thirty days' notice of prior redemption will be given by mail to the bank where the Bonds are payable and to the registered owners, and published notice of prior redemption will be given in the manner provided by Chapter 475, Minnesota Statutes. This Bond is transferable, as provided by the Resolu- tion of the City Council authorizing the issuance of the Bonds of this series adopted June 10, 1985 (the "Resolution") only upon books of the City Real dt the uffice of the bond Registrar by the -4- registered owner hereof in person or by the owner's duly author- ized attorney, upon surrender of this Bond for transfer at the office of the Bond Registrar, duly endorsed by, or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer in form satisfactory to the Bond Registrar duly executed by the registered owner hereof or the owner's duly authorized attorney, and, upon payment of any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer, one or more fully registered Bonds of the series of the same principal amount and interest rate will be issued to the designated transferee or transferees. The Bonds of this series are issuable only as fully registered bonds without coupons in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof not exceeding the principal amount maturing in any one year. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations therein set forth, the Bonds of this series are exchangeable for a like aggregate principal amount of Bonds of this series of a different authorized denomi- nation, as requested by the registered owner or the owner's duly authorized attorney upon surrender thereof to the Bond Registrar. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED That all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond have been done, have happened and have been performed in regular and due form, and that this Bond, together with all other indebtedness of the City outstanding on the date of its issuance, does not exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation of indebtedness. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose until the Authentication Certificate hereor shall have been signed by the Bond Registrar. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Orono, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed in its behalf by the facsimile signature of the yayor and by the facsim- ile signature of the City Clerk, and a facsimile of its official seal to he printed hereon, all as of the Date of Original Issue specified above. Dated: (Facsimile Signature) Mayor (Seal) (Facsimil(' Signature) City Clerk -5- Bond Registrar's Authentication Certificate This is one of the Bonds described in the within mentioned Resolution. Bond Registrar By Authorized Signature ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto (Please Print or Typewrite Name and Address of Transferee) the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: Please Insert Social Notice: The signature to this Security Number or Other assignment must correspond with the Identifying Number of name as it appears on the face of Assignee this Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatever. Signature Guaranteed: Signatures must be guaranteed by a national bank or trust company or by a brokerage firm having membership in one of the major stock exchanges (Certificate as to Legal Opinion) I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Orono, Minnesota, hereby certify that except for the date line, the foregoing is a full, true and compared copy of the legal opinion of Faegre & Benson, of Minneapolis, Minnesota which was delivered to me upon delivery of the bonds and is now on file in my office. (Facsimile Signature) City Clerk -6- 4. The Bonds shall be payable upon present4tion at the main office of , in , as Registrar and Paying Agent, or at the offices of such other successor agents as the City may hereafter designate upon 60 days mailed notice to the registered addresses. Interest shall be paid by check or draft of the Registrar mailed to the registered owners at their addresses shown on the registration books on each interest payment date unless other arrangements satisfactory to the Bond Registrar the City and the registered owners of Bonds are made. The City shall deposit immediately available funds with the Bond Registrar sufficient for the payment of such interest as is to be paid in such manner on the business day preceding each interest payment date. 5. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the City Clerk and when so prepared shall be executed on behalf of the City by the facsimile signature of the Maycr and by the fac- simile signature of the City Clerk, under a facsimile of its official seal. The Bonds shall not be valid for any purpose until authenticated by the Bond Registrar. The Bond Registrar is authorized and directed to register the Bonds initially issued hereunder in such names as the purchaser may direct. The Bonds initially issued hereunder shall be registered as of July 1, 1985, and all Bonds issued in exchange therefor shall be regis- tered as of such date, or, if issued after the first payment date, as of the most recent interest payment date on which in- terest was paid or duly provided for. The legal opinion of Faegre & Benson of Minneapolis, Minnesota, respecting the valid- ity and enforceability of the Bonds shall be reproduced on the reverse side of each Bond at the request of the purchaser and shall be certified by the facsimile signature of the City Clerk. When the Bonds shall have been so prepared and executed, they shall be delivered by the City Clerk end in exchange for the purchase price and upon receipt of the signed legal opinion of Faegre & Benson, and the purchaser shall not be required to see to the proper application of the proceeds. 6. As long as any of the Bonds issued hereunder shall remain outstanding, the City shall maintain and keep at the office of the Bond Registrar an office or agency for the payment of the principal of and interest on such Bonds, as in this Resolution provided, and for the registration and transfer of such Bonds, and shall also keep at said office of the Bond Registrar books for such registration and tran--fer. Upon surren- der for transfer of any Bond at the office of the Bond Registrar with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner's duly authorized attorney, and upon payment of any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer, the City shall execute and the Bond Registrar .11 authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated 'Lansferee or transferees, one or more fully registered Bonds of the same series, of any authorized denominations and of a like aggregate principal amount, interest rate and maturity. The Bonds, upon surrender thereof at the office of the Bond Registrar may, at the option of the registered owner thereof, be exchanged for an equal aggregate principal amount of Bonds of the same maturity and interest rate of any authorized denominations. In all cases in which the privilege of exchanging Bonds or transfer- ring fully registered Bonds is exercised, the City shall execute and the Bond Registrar shall deliver Bonds in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution. For every such exchange or trans- fer of Bonds, whether temporary or definitive, the City or the Bond Registrar may make a charge sufficient to reimburse it for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such exchange or transfer, which sum or sums shall be paid by the person requesting such exchange or transfer as a condition precedent to the exercise of the privilege of making such exchange or transfer. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Resolution, the cost of preparing each new Bond upon each exchange or transfer, and any other expenses of the City or the Bond Registrar incurred in connection therewith (except any applicable tax, fee or other governmental charge) shall be paid by the City. The City shall not be obligated to make any such exchange or transfer of Bonds during the fifteen (15) days next preceding the date of the first publication or the mailing (if there is no publication) of notice of redemption in the case of a proposed redemption of Bonds. The City and the Bond Registrar shall not be required to make any transfer or exchange of any Bonds called for redemption. 7. Interest on any Bond which is payable, and is punctually paid or duly provided for, on any interest payment date shall be paid to the person in whose name that Bond for one or more Bonds for which such Bond was exchanged) is registered at the close of business on the 15th day of the month preceding such interest payment date. Any interest on any Bond which is pay- able, but is not punctually paid or duly provided for, on any interest payment date shall forthwith cease to be payable to the registered holder on the relevant regular record date solely by virtue of such holder having been such holder; and such defaulted interest may be paid by the City in any lawful manner, if, after notice given by the City to the Bond Registrar of the proposed payment pursuant to this paragraph, such payment shall be deemed practicable by the Bond Registrar. Subject to the foregoing provisions of this paragraph, each Bond delivered under this Resolution upon transfer of or in exchanges for or in lieu of any other Bond shall carry all the rights to interest accrued and unpaid, and to accrue, which were carried by such other Bond and each such Bond shall bear interest from F:.ch date that neither -8- gain nor loss i- interest shall result from such transfer, exchange or sub-citution. 8. As to any Bond, the City and the Bond Registrar and their respective successors, each in its discretion, may deem and treat the person in whose name the same for the time being shall be registered as the absolute owner thereof for all p.ir- poses•and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar nor their respective successors shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. Payment of or on account of the principal of any such Bond shall be made only to or upon the order of the registered owner thereof, but such registration may be changed as above provided. All such payments shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. 9. There is hereby created a special fund, to be known as the Improvement Bonds of 1985 Fund, and in the event the principal of and interest upon the said ',;i'G shall become due and payable and there are insufficient n. in said Fund to pay such principal and interest, the Finance ,_:.ector is authorized and directed to pay said principal and interest from the general fund and thereafter to reimburse said general fund from collections of taxes levied hereby and special assessments for Project No. 85-1. The proceeds of the Bonds herein authorized shall be deposited in a separate construction fund to be used --lel;" for the payment of expenses of the Improvement. Any ining proceeds may be used for any lawful purpose. All ctions of special assessments for the Improvement are hereby cably appropriated and pledged to the payment of principal c interest on the Bonds herein authorized, and the moneys 31 estments in the Improvement Bonds of 1985 Fund shall be use _or no other purpose than to pay principal of and interest on the said Bonds until such principal and interest shall ha„ been paid in full; provided, however, that nothing herein crn- tained shall prevent the issuance and sale of additional bonds payable from the proceeds of such assessments to provide addi- tional funds to pay the balance of the ccst of said improvement. 10. It is hereby found and determined that the estimated collection of special assessments pledged for the pay- ment of saiA Bonds will, with the taxes hereby levied, produce at least five rcent in excess of the amount needed to meet, wh� due, the principal and interest payments on the Bond-, and it is further found and determined that the special benefits to be assessed against assessable property for the improvement will, in any case, be more than. 20% of the cost of the improvement to the municipality. For the purpose of paying the City's share of the cost of said improvement, there is hereby levied on all taxable -9- property within the corporate limits of the Citv a general ad valorem tax in the years collectible and in the amount provided as follows: Year Collectible Amount 11. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to pre- pare and furnish to the purchaser and to the attorneys approving the Bonds, certified copies of all proceedings and records relating to the issuance of said General obligation Improvement Bonds of 1985 and to the right, power and authority of the City and its officers to issue the same, and said certified copies and certificates shall be deemed the representations of the City as to all matters seated therein. 12. The City Clerk shall furnish a certified ;)y of this resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin Count and obtain the County Auditor's certificate as required by law. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member and upon vote being taken thereon the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against 'qe same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. -10- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS. ) CITY OF ORONO ) I, the undersigned, be.neg duly quali.ied and acting City Clerk of the City of Orono, M;rinesota, hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City helC June 10, 1985 with the original thereof on Fj' of re^.ord in my of 'ice and the sai- is , lull, - i an. .nplete transcript therefrom i:. -. a as trt same relates to the issuance and sale of $900,000 Ge it Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1985 of said City. WITNESS My hand offic and the seal oz the City this _ day _ 1. irk City c.f Orono, Minnesota (Seal) NEWCOMBE & HANSEN APPRAISALS. INC. SERGE IfANSEN. - • ASSOCIATE APPRArSLITS M JOANN HANSEN, w • CHRIS,OPH► R HALF)EN KATHRYN LVJEN I MK/ :�� '. r't ., r r. •«p1l r :I'•.` ,i «s ROBE 1 f UH DERNrS ANSENOSUN ..I w ..r • «•,yl ws CYN7HIA f UHEFMANN VERNE HANSEN CATHLEEN CHOROI DENNIS D KELSALL • DE WEY NEWCOMfiE. — «1. —lu 1,30 NORWE ST MIDI AND P 1;,DING 401 SECOND AVEN , SOUTH MINNLAPOLIS MINNESOTA SS401 • 612 3390400 #18479 June 7, 1985 Ms. Kathy Harder, President Art Center of Minnesota PO Box 158 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Ms. Harder: As requested, I have made an inspection of the Art Center of Minnesota property located at P"40 North Shore Drive, Crystal Bay, Minnesota. Fter havino viewf:<i Ue type of operation and fa ' 'tips -14-h compose the -imary structures on the Art Center property, I )f .:pinion that the market value of the property is one which be •ident upon an alternate of lesser use of the existing Art Cent(:. The Art Center of Minnesota East is classified -as a Historic Property and would have to continue to be utilized in some manner which is consistent with its architecture. This could include renovation of the building to offices, retai' or apartments, so long as the exterior architecture remained intact. Art Center of Minnesota West The Art Center of Minnesota West is a str-irtr re which consist.. of a former elementary school with an approrrr age of 30 years, and an addition constructed in approximately 1978. The --w addition contained approximately 9,920 sf., the original building 10,018 sf. for z 'ntal building area of approximately 19,938 sf. The 6, going is constructed of mc-onry walls, a concretf, slab floor, and er plain finish on the in�er )r with exposed r,;li•;,5s. The new building on the easterly enu nas a floor !I which is at a lower elevation than the existing or old f,uildin. The buildinq is in good physical condition and c..^ be expected to remain serviceah'n for its ;resent use for an indefinite time period. NF-WCOMBE & HANSEN APPRAISALS, INC. M I N N E A P O L I S. MINNESOTA 5 5 4 0 1 #18479 -2- Art Cent of Minnesota East The Art Center of Minnesota East is a older structure, constructed in the late 1800's or early 1900's and has been designated as a Historic Structure. The building has two floors above grade, measuring approximately 1,800 sf. per floor for a total of 3,600 sf. above grade. U! ity Services ThL two buildings are each served by a separate septic system which are capable of supporting the buildings and treating the waste from the Art Center. The septic system for the Art Center of MinneNica East, is reported to be an older system and while not constructed specifically to modern requirements, is still functioning adequately and there is no reason to anticipate any change in the immediate future. The system which serves the Art Center West is reported to he a system which meets or exceeds the requirements of the Cite ind adequately serves that structure and should be able to r "lie into the foreseeable future. Estimates' Market Values The ._:imated market value of the Art Center property, as improved, is subject to a considerable amount of speculation due to the use and potential of sale to an alternate user on the open market. The most closely related use for the property would be for a day school or Montessori School which could utilize approximately 50% of the structure or all of the Art Center East building. For alternate u5Ps, th( st probable use of the property would be for subdivis= - n single t, ly residential property, which would mean the deme, n and vumoval of the existing structure, as well as the existing sic system including the drain fields. In the case of alternate use, requiring demolition, it is highly probable that approximately three residential lots could be developed on the property, u;i,,g the existing zoning of R1 which requires two acres per lot. While the site is slightly small for that subdivision. it is probable that a variance could be granted to allow for three residential lots. N EWCOM BE & HANSEN APPRAISALS, INC. M I N N F A P 0 L: S /.1 1 N N F S T A 5- 4 U 1 #18479 -3- Estimated Market Value Before and After Assessments: In viewing the property, in estimating its market value as if placed on the open market, it is my opinion that the property, in its present condition, with a private sewage disposal system, would have an overall market value of approximately $15.00 per sgjare foot of gross building area above grade or: 23,538 sf. x $15.00 psf. = $353,070 Estimated Market Value Before Sewer Improvements: $350,000 Estimated Mao et Value After Sewer Improvements: Given the circumstances that the ,roperty is to be improved with public sewer, the most optimistic difference in value to the property would be approximately 10% increase in value which would be calculated as fellows: $350,000 x 1.10 = $385,J00 Estimated Value After Sewer Replacement: $385,000 Conclusion of Value 0iscu,sion The differential in value to the property is equal to approximately $35,000, which is basically quite minimal, however a purchaser contemplating the purchase of this property in a before and after situation would bL looking at the cost of connection, and the onrling and future payments for sewer usage, thereby increasing the cost of operations in the property. The cost of sewer rental or payment, exclusive of assessments, would have to be considered into perpetuity whereas the cost for maintaining the existing septic systems could be maintained on a sinking fund basis as or near the same cost of operation. NEWCOMBE & HANSEN APPRAISALS, INC. M I N N F A P O L 1 5. M I N N F b O T A 5 5 4 0 1 #E18478 -4- Conclusion of Value Discussion (Cont'd) In analyzing the value of the property on a before and after basis, considering its present use and continued use as a community based Art Center, or for uses on an alternate basis, it is my opinion that the property would not be able to sustain a value increase equal to the proposed assessments of $91,000 based on the concept that it is equal to ten units for assessment purposes at $9,100 per unit as proposed. It is improbable that the benefit to the Art Center in the amount of $91,000 could be realized and that such a cost which would be almost equivalent to 25% of the estimated market value, is highly questionable and not realistically attainable. I have not completed the appraisal in detail, and reserve the right to make changes in the final opinion, however this letter represents my preliminary findinqs and should be taken to mean that the assessments proposed to be levied against the Art Center of Minnesota would be excessive and should be challenged on the basis that the assessments would not contribute to the value of tl.,� Center in the amount equal to the cost of the assessments. If you wish to discuss this in greater detail, and need to have the appraisal completed to support my preliminary findings, please call me at your convenience. Sincerely, NEWCO"'9E & HANSEN k PRAISALS, INC. By: r--" 1446�� Berge Hansen, ►,,I sb Appraising Qualifications of Berge Hansen EDUCATION and PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS Bachelor of Science Degree -- South Dakota State University. Master of Education Degree (Administration) — South Dakota State University. Professional Real Estate Appraisal Studies — American Institute of Real Estate Appraisal Courses: 1966- (Course I — Basic Pi ir:iples, Methods and 'rechmques of Appraisal 1968-Course 11 — Urban Properticc 1964--Course III — Rural Properties 1972-Course VI — Theories and Principles of Capitalization E'ected h1crnber of American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, M.A.I. Designation No. 5080. Associate Member of Greater Minneafxilis Area Board of Realtors. Member of Mortgage Bankers Association of Minnesota APPRAISAL EXPERIE14CE Prudential Insurance Company of America Ten years experience as Appraiser and Planal•er in 'I he Real Estate Investment Department. Negotiated morteage loans and appraisals of residential, farm and ranch, comnicrcial and indusinal properties,- includ-ing work on purchase leaseback, joint ventures ;ind purchase propt•rtie%. Newcombe and Hanscn Appraisals Inc. Independent Fee Appraiser as President and Partner of NCIA-combC & Hansen Appraisals, Inc. A Partial list of clients served is as follows: Northern States Power Co. Knutson Companies Acacia Mutual Life Ins. Co. First National Bank of Mpls. First National Bank of St. Paul Midland National Bank of Mpls Flietman Mortgage Companv F W. Woolworth Compan% Federal Home Loan Board Hiimc Equity Hennepin Federal Savings & I .oan Honeyw-rll Ninth District Federal Reserve Pnidential Inc Company I fie Bankers life Company Minnc,, ota HiLhwav Dv, iment City of % inneapohs City of St Lout Park City of Minnetonka City of Hopkins Hennepin County, Minnesota Klodt-C adle Properties Cushman A akefield Inland Construction Co. Phillips Petroleum Company Minneapolis Housing and Redevelopment Authority Turbodyne-Electric Machinery Mfg. Teachers Ins & Annuity Assoc. of America B. F. Saul Advisory Co. App .sisals completed include a variety of all types of Diioperties including industrial properties, shopping centers, apartments, office buildines and recreational land developments. Appraisa'a have been made for buyer-, sellers and in.cstors of all types of real estate. Specialist as li cimsultant in real estate mortVAge financing and investment. t)u:ilit.cit a, ,ir r%;,, r, %& i,it- in condemnation Arid real csldte talk cases ART CENTER OF MINNESOTA12240 NORTHSHORE DRIVE, CRYSTAL BAY, MINNESOTA 55323fl6121 473-7361 Ma U fhb. STING JUN 101°85 City of Orono Crystal Bay, NIN 553_23 Would you please see that the following people have a copy of the attached letter. Thank you. Mary Butler Mark Bernhardson John Ge rhardson Tom Frahm Tim Adams Lynn Adams James Grabek Tom Radial Si acerely, Marion C. Gray Director, Art Cente Boar ART CENTER OF MINNESOTA/ 2240 NORMSHORE DRIVE, CRYSTAI BAN, MINNESOTA 55323ii6121 473-7361 Mr. Roger Janzig Staff Engineer Metropolitan Waste 350 Metro Square 7th and Robert St. Paul, MN 55101 Dear Mr. Janzig: Control Commission May 17, 1985 COL.6 KFIL NIFETING ,!U!1 1010?5 CITY OF R94. 0 In accordance with our phone conversation the afternoon of Monday, May 13, 1985 I am enclosing a sheet with figures for the number of students attending the Art Center of Minnesota on our heaviestday of classes, Tuesday, and the time they spend at the Center. I also thought I would include our lightest day which is Friday so you can see the difference. You will note that on our heaviest day 35% of the people are only here for one hour, 39% for two or less hours and 96% for three hours or •ss. ' suggest that only a handful of these people ever the facilities. Just 4% or 8 people are here for more tt:atn three hours and this is the equivalent to two families of -nur people each. In reality this would be less than two families considering that no one takes showers, baths, does laundry or stays overnight. On our lightest day of classes 92" of the people are here for three hours or less. Only 8% or 8 people are here for more than three hours. 1 want to stress the uniqueness of the Art Center. It is not comparable to an elementary school in water usage because: 1. The maximum time spent in classrooms is 3 hours compared to 6+ hours in an elementary school. Our use of the facilities would therefore be mimimal. 2. Our students are not required to stay for lunch as are grades 1 through 4 in an elementary school. If you have any questions regarding these figures please call me at 473-3100 or at the Art Center, 473-7361. I would be delighted meet with you and Jo Ellen Hurr at your convenience to try to -.x ow unit figures. Our next meeting with the Council of the Cic, of Orono is Tuesday, May 28th at 7:00 p.m. Sincerely, Marion C. Gray Director, Art Cent Bo d May 17, 1985 STUDY FOR METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COWIISSION ON NUMBER OF STUDENTS ATTENDING THE ART CENTER OF MINNESOTA ON HEAVIEST AND LIGHTEST DAY OF CLASSES AND HOURS ATTENDED Tuesday classes for Spring 1985 (Heaviest day) Classes & Staff 7h hrs. 3 hrs. 2 hrs. 1 hr. 45 min. Total a.m. students 43 7 4 54 p.m. students 18 10 4 32 night 39.5 39.5 Dining Room * 47 aver. 47 Staff & DR emp 8 2 10 Total 8 102.5 7 61 4 182.5 Friday classes for Spring 1985 (Lightest day) Classes $ Staff 7� hrs. 3 h:-. 2h hrs. 1 hr. Dotal a.m. students 14 11 7 32 p.m. students 13 13 Dining Room* 47 aver. 47 Staff $ DR emp. 8 2 10 Total 8 16 34 54 102 *The Dining Room does not keep specific records. They say they can serve 6n on a heavy day and 35 on a light. day. Fridays are apt to be very light. Copies of the May 17, 1985 letter to Mr. Rcger Janzig went to: Robert G. Mitchell Mary Butler Mark Bernhardson John Gerhardson Tom Frahm Tim Adams Lynn Adams James Grabek Tom Radial Jo Ellen fiurr John Burger Kathy Harder Toni Richardson Susan Enright Nick Legeros MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIh MEETING HELD MAY 28, 1985. PAGE 1 ATTENDANCE 7:05 PH The Orono Council met on the above date with the following members present: Acting Mayor Frahm, Councilmembers Lynn Adams and Tim Adams. Mayor Butler and Councilmember Grabek were absent. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson, Police Chief Kilbo, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaff ron, and Recorder Sutton. City Attorney Radio and City Engineer Cook were also present. CON:- NT AGENDA* Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember T. Adams seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda* as submitted, with all staff reports concerning these items to be attached to an original copy of these minutes on file at the Cit., Clerk's office. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). .': WIZEN COMMENDATIONS RESOLUTION 41763 RESOLUTION #1764 RESOLUTION #1765 RESOLUTION #1766 Arthur Priez was present. i'olice Chief Kilbo was present. City Administrator Bernhardson presented Resolution $1764, to Arthur Priez commending his participation in the COUNCIL MEETING apprehension of a burglar. James Rick arrived later in the meeting at 7:25 p.m. City JUN 1019065 Administrator Bernhardson presented Resolution #1763, to James Rick commending his participation in the apprehension of a burglar. C+" Or VnVNo City Administ: Bernhardson noted that Frank and Barb Peterson will r.,jt be present tonight to receive their resolutions of commendation and the City will mail their resolutions to them. Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve Resolution #1763, A ResolL, r. commending James Rick in his participation in the apprei,...►sion of a burglar. Motion, Ayes (3). Nays (0). Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve Resolution 0176", A Resolution commending Arthur Piresz, Jr., in his participation in the apprehension of a bur,3lar. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). Acting Mayoi Frahm moved, Councilmember L. A:iams seconded, to approve Resolution. #1765, A Resolution commending Prank Peterson in his pd -icipaticn in a apprehension, of 3 burglar. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays ti). Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve Resolution 01766, A Resolution commending Peterson in her participation in the apprehension c.f a burglar. Motion, Ayes (3), -Aays (0). MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MFETINC: HELD MAY 28, 1985. PAGE 2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES* Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember T. Adams seconded, to approve the regular Council minutes of May 13, 1985 as submitted. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0).. PARK COMMISS'ON COMMEN". There were no Park Commission comments. LAKE M1NNE CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPL,t RepreFentative Jo Ellen Hurr was present. Hurr informed the Counc 1 that a lake inspection tour is scheduled for Augur+_ 3, 1985, at 11 a.m. Hurr stated that the LMCD is evaluating deicing procedures for marinas. Hurr reported that the LMCD is evaluating the s, rage of boats on the lake. Hurt explained that there are 3 ful.-time water patrol off'.cers and 20 volunteers. Hurr stated that the DWI law wds adopted by the LMCD but noted that the water patro.l cannot require a person to take the DWI test if the boat is r.,.j+ moving and that the only time a DWI ticket can by iE ­d is if the boat is actually moving. Hurr noted that requested by the Council, she contacts' Chaska Marini. _id has set up two appointments with Chaska and that they have cancelled both times. Acting Mayr:, Frahm felt that there should be more water patrol people patrolling the lake. Frar.r. as•ii-a for a response from the LMCD regarding the lobbying a��irt,- the'".:' if they proper.- more public accesses to the lake, Fr. nm f that the DNR should fund the extra ater patrol people `: will be nee"-ed. PLANNING COMM I S S I 00 WMMRXTS There were no Planning Commission commentr,. PUBLIC COMMEN.b There were no comments from the public present. l911 TIMOTHY SCHOEN 41 WILLOW DRIVE NORTH VARIANCE RESOLUTION 11767 PUBLIC HEARING 7:41 - 7:50 PM Acting Mayor Frahm called fc: public heari•wn at :41 p.m. concerning T:m Scboen's variance applicatit n to cv:. ;truct a ne home. .uilding b Zoning Administr :tor Mabusth noted t%It cercific..t. f mailing and the affidavit of publication. Tim Schoen % �F, pr c ^>ent . B' 1 l Wear of 36 Hac '• -ry Hill was present for this public hciring. Bi 11 Wear o:` 3b Hackberry Hi 1 noted that he o:.,. the ;property west of Lhis propert,,. WEai noted that there i- a fence a :roes the tact of his property but that the fens oes not senate the exact property line. Wear explained there there havr. been drainage pi ns in this area. Wear stated that MINUTE;; 01' THE k1-:G.11.Ak OHONO COUNCIL MEET I NG HELD MAY 28, 1985. PAGE 3 years ago he came before the Council to get permission to install a tile from Watertown Road to Hackberry Park. Wear noted that he used to own the lots in this area and subdivided them. Wear stated that a drainage problem was created and that the subject lot being discussed tonight used to be the low lot in the subdivision and at onetime had cattails in it. Wear explained that he sold the lot that the home they used to Live in and built the home they live in now, he had to dig 2 1/2 feet of dirt to make his lot lower than the surrounding lots. Wear noted that the sbi l was a gray sandy loam and contained water. Wear stated that he tiled from his home out around the south, east, and north boundary lines and a couple of years later the subject lot with cattails on it dried up and became a likely spot for a vegetable garden. Wear stated that it is the only way the water can flow across his lot. Wear asked that the City assure him that the grade on 41 Willow Drive be kept the same and not create any retaining ponds to keep the drainage onto his property. Wear stated that is has been brought to his attention that the City of Orono held this hearing to expedite things and that the City was only interested in Schoen's $150 fee for the variance application. Wear asked that the City consider refunding the applicant's money because the City issued the building permit before the public hearing. Building i Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that the Council was polled on this variance application and that. in order to allow the construction to be expedited the application was brought before the Council. Acting Mayor Frahm closed the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember T. Adams seconded, to adopt Resolution 01767, A Resolution Approving a Variance to allow construction of a new residence. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays !0). 1876 RANDY ASPLUND 3 4 2 4- 3 4 4 4 EA S T I .A K P. STRSST VARIANCE: RESOLUTION 11768 Randy Asplund was present. Assistant Zoning Administrator saffron explained that staff drafted a resolution of denial per Council directive. Gaffron stated that the applicant is now requesting a screened -in porch and that would probably require tradeoffs in hardcover. Acting Mayor Frahm felt that the appl icant is requesting too many significant changes that. the application should be referred back to the Planning Commission. Frahm noted that the City has never approved detached floating slab decks within the 0-75' setback zone before. Randy Asplund explained that he has sold one of the homes and that the owners would like an answer regarding the patios as soon as possible. Asplund agreed to remove the pat i cs but would like to knew whatto do with it after the patios are removed. MINUTE!, OF THE Il'•:(;UI.AH ORONO COUN('I1, M1•:ETING fif:I,l) MAY 28, 1985. PAGE 4 Acting Mayor Frahm advised Asplund that after the patios are removed, that the ground should be sodded. Councilmember L. Adams noted that he has a problem approving anything in the 0-75' setback area. Councilmember L. Adams moved, Acting Mayor Frahm seconded, to adopt Resolution #1768, A Resolution denying variances for the fence and patio concrete request with a deadline date for removal of patios for June 15, 1985, for 3424 Eastlake Street and July 23, 1985, for 3444 Fistlake Street and the request for deck platform and screen ,3 porch to be referred to the Planning Commission for their review. Motion, Ayes (2), Nays (1). Councilmember T. Adams voted nay. #897 CHUCK PETERSON 825 OLD LONG LAKE ROAD PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION Chuck Peterson was present. Assistant Zoning Adminis- trator Gaffron stated that the surveyor reconfirmed the dry buildable area that Council requested at the last meeting. Gaffron confirmed that there is 2.0 acres of dry buildable per lot in the area identified strictly as a seasonal drainageway. #903 WARD FERR); LL 3405 WATERTOWN ROAD ZONING APPEAL Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve the preliminary subdivision application of Chuck Peterson. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). Mr. and Mrs. Ward Ferrell were present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that the applicant was brought in under a zoning appeal in order to save the applicant some money. Gaffron explained that if the applicant had applied for a variance that the application would be more costly and with the Council's past precedents the Council would probably have denied the application. City Attorney Radio asked how much the full variance application would have cost. Radio noted that by allowing this applicant the appeals procedure the City is saving the applicant money, but by handling this matter the City is not treating this application as a variance and not using the same standards. Radio noted that the decision reached tonight does not presume that the same decision would be reached on a formal variance application. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that the variance application would be $150, plus the applicant's expense for additional surveying work, plus the extra expense for septic test ing for each lot . Gaf f ron c st imatud MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. HEFTING HELD MAY 28, 1985. PAGE '; #903 FERRELL that the application could have cost the applicant $1,000 just to get denied. Gaffron noted that staff felt that the applicant could get some general direction from the City under the zoning appeals application process. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that the Alden Anderson application is very similar to this Ferrell application. Gaffron explained that the applicant owns four adjacent tax parcels totaling 2.90 acres. Gaffron noted that the applicant wishes to obtain a building permit for the 1.04 acre lot. Ward Ferrell stated that he has owned the land since 1948 and built the existing home in 1958. Ferrell stated that he bought and has saved this land with the intent to build his retirement home. Ferrell stated that Herb Ross (former Orono Mayor) had requested him to divide his property. Ferrell stated that as a favor to Ross and the City and to stop trouble in the future, he divided the property into four parcels. Ferrell stated that then the zoning changed in 1967 and at the time the hearing was held regarding this zoning change, he asked whether it would affect existing lots and he was told no by the City. Ferrell noted that he is willing a parcel of land for his daughter to build on. Ferrell stated that. in 1980 the Stubbs Bay Marina was divided and the City allowed very small lots. Ferrell felt that he should receive the same treatment that Stubbs Bay Marina had received. Acting Mayor Frahm explained that the City agreed to smaller lots in the Stubbs Bay Marina because the City felt that it would be a less intense use on the property with residential units rather than the intense use of the commercial marina. Frahm stated that there were very extenuating circumstances with the Ftubbs Bay Marina and shouldn't be used to compare with this application since the circumstances were significantly different. Ward Ferrell asked if the City was going to honor what Herb Ross requested. Ferrell stated that Ross told him to cont ct George Hanson (former assessor for Orono) to see what the lot sizes should be when he was subdividing the property. Ferrell stated that Hanson told him 140' width for each lot. Acting Mayor asked staff what the typical lot size is in the neighborhood. Ward Ferrell stated that the average lot size is one acre and only one parcel is two acres. Councilmember T. Adams asked how many units the applicant is requesting out of a total of 2.9 acres. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron answered that the applicant. is requesting a total of three building sites (one existing, one for the retirement home, one for his daughter ) . MINUTES ON THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 28, 1985. PAGE #903 FERRELL Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that in 1967 the standards changed when the zoning code was revised effecting the applicant. Acting Mayor Frahm explained that it is hard for the City to honor a verbal opinion that was made in 1967. Frahm felt to be fair to the applicant that he would consider two building sites, but certainly not three building sites. Councilmember T. Adams stated that before deciding the Council should see all relevant background information. Councilmember L. Adams symphathized with this type of problem when the owner purchases property and keeps it with the intent in the future to build on the property only to have the zoning code standards change, Adams stated that he cannot see installing three septic tank systems on three small lots since the septic tanks will be the permanent system installed there. Adams noted conceptually that he would consider two building sites only because of the problem that the applicant owned the property with the intent to build in the future only to have the zoning code standards change. Adams noted that if it weren't for that reason he would not even consider two building sites. Adams stated that when the septic systems are placed too close together on small lots such as these, there are potential problems with ground water contamination when these systems fail. Acting Mayor Frahm expressed his concern that if the City approved three lots that the City would create a density pocket similar to the Crystal Bay neighborhood in which the City would have to go back in the f uture to correct the problem by sewering the area. Ward Ferrell stated that his septic system is 28 years old and has never had a problem with leakage. Ferrell pointed out that he has paid taxes on the property as if they were buildable lots since 1948 and now he cannot use the property. Ferrell stated that up until two years ago they paid taxes on the two vacant lots as if there were separate building sites. Ferrell noted that two years ago the taxes were lowered from $11,000 to $5,500. Ferrell explained that he has already told his daughter that she can have the lot and he is not going back on his word. Ferrell asked if the City was going to honor what Herb Ross told him years ago. Acting Mayor Frahm stated, in his opinion, no. Mrs. Ferrell asked if the City was going to refund their taxes that they have paid for buildable lots all these years. City Administrator Bernhardson stated that should a variance be applied for that in the review it should be considered what position the applicant would have been in if he had not. sutAivided the property. MINl17I::; OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNC11, MEETING I11:1,1) MAY 28, 1985. PAGE 7 #903 FERRELL Councilmember L. Adams gave his opinion should the applicant apply for a variance, he would be willing to consider a total of two lots. Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember T. Adams seconded, to affirm the staff's interpretation of the zoning code. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). #908 6 #924 JON SCHERVEN 2649 CASCO POINT RD (#908) VARIANCE - RESOLUTION (#924) CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION Jon Scherven was present with his father A.W. Scherven. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that the applicant proposes to build a two story addition over the existing concrete slab and deck on the lake side of his parents home. Gaffron noted that the applicant proposes hardcover tradeof f s, and that the proposed deck does extend into the 75' setback zone. Gaffron stated that the conditional use permit is required because the applicant is requesting to use the basement as a guest apartment for his parents who are retiring. Gaffron noted that applicant does propose a kitchen in the basement but !'ias agreed that the second dwelling unit would never be rented out. Gaffron noted the Planning Commission did approve the application subject to the following regarding the guest apartment use: 1 ) apartment for use of family members only; 2 ) apartment use may not be conveyed to a purchaser; 3 ) guest apartment may not be rented out and such to be confirmed by staff yearly; 4 ) use is subject to City review at end of four years. Acting Mayor Frahm asked ,f a separate entrance is proposed for the guest apartment use. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that the main entrance would be used, but that once inside the main entrance, a door leading to the basement and a door leading to the upstairs is proposed. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that the Council did recently approve the Beck conditional use permit which is similar to this application. Councilmember L. Adams felt that the lot is really too small to support another dwelling unit. Jon Scherven explained that his parents have tried to sell the home and have not been able to. Scherven stated that he has of fered to buy the home, remodel it, and then they would be able to live in the basement. Scherven confirmed that he will agree to any stipulations the Council wishes to place on the guest apartment use. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 28, 1985. PAGE 8 $908 b #f924 SCHF.RVEN Councilmember Frahm noted his concern for the future when the Schorvens move out and the f uture owner may try to rent out the apartment. Frahm noted it is hard for staff to police such a use. Jon Scherven responded that the neighborhood would probably police itself. Councilmember L. Adams suggested a compromise with one kitchen. Jon Scherven noted that one kitchen would be very inconvenient for all living there. City Attorney noted that the resolution could be written in a manner in which the parents would have no vested rights. Councilmember Frahm stated that the entrance to the home should appear as any other single family residence. Frahm stated that the two doors inside the main entrance should be eliminated so that it does not seem that there are two dwelling units. Frahm noted that he has a problem with the deck extending into the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone. Councilmember L. Adams suggested an alternate plan to give the entrance a more open view and appear as one single family residence. Jon Scherven noted that with this plan it would not be very energy efficient with one door in the winter time. Councilmember L. Adams noted that the current proposal is a potential duplex plan. Council suggested tabling the application to allow the applicant time to redesign his plan. Jon Scherven explained that he is trying to sell his home in Mound and has a purchaser ready to buy if this application is approved. Scherven stated that he isn't sure if the purchaser will wait for two weeks for an answer. Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to conceptually approve the conditional use permit and variance application but to table application until June 10, 1985, and further directs staff to redraft resolution and applicant to redesign and submit his plan reflecting the following: 1. Deck and steps to remain outside of the 0-75' setback zone and not to extend beyond the side boundaries of the home. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 28, 1985. PAGE 9 2. Council will grant Conditional Use Permit for a guest apartment use if applicant redesigns proposal to eliminate doors and walls separating the basement and upstairs to give the entrance an open appearance. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). 1921 CHUCK VAN EECKHOUT 2135 SALEM COURT VARIANCE RESOLUTION Chuck Van Eeckhout was present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that Van Eeckhout seeks a setback variance as a result of the new home being incorrectly placed too close to the lot line. Gaffron noted that either a lot line rearrangement or variance application was needed. Van Eeckhout noted that the proposed home next door will be placed further from the lot line so as not to create crowding. Van Eeckhout stated that he will retain an easement over Lot 3 in favor of Lot 4. Council suggested that staff incorporate this easement requirement into the resolution. Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember T. Adams seconded, to conceptually approve variance application subject to staff redrafting resolution to reflect the easement condition as discussed. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). Van Eeckhout asked if he could continue with the home until the resolution is adopted. Council agreed to let the builder continue on the home. STATUS REPORT 3399 CRYSTAI, BAY ROAD* ON CONSENT AGENDA BUT DISCUSSION WAS HELD Jerry Wheeler and Sandra George of 3399 Crystal Bay Road were present. City Administrator Bernhardson noted that this item was on the consent agenda for Counci 11s informat ion but noted that Jerry Wheeler was in the audience and asked Wheeler if he would like to address the Council. Jerry Wheeler stated that he would like to address the Council about the complaint against him. Wheeler explained that when he moved on the property he agreed to the variance conditions in good faith with every intent on following through with the condition to removing the hardcover. Wheeler noted that he did remove half of the hardcover. Wheeler noted that when they were installing the basement problems began with flooding in the basement. wheeler MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING tl}:I.I) MAY 28, 1985. PAGE 10 3399 CRYSTAL BAY claimed that the gravel hardcover helps alleviate the water ROAD STATUS draining into his basement. Wheeler explained that he and Sandra have spent more money than intended on the basement and therefore haven't been able to finish the project as soon as they would have liked. Wheeler noted that at the time they agreed to the variance conditions, they did not fully understand exactly what hardcover was. Wheeler noted that they did sod the entire yard when they moved in and eliminated much of the runoff . Wheeler stated that they would like a flat parking pad on his property where the remaining hardcover is because of the steepness of the grade. Wheeler explained that the complaint against him defeats his neighbors ewn complaint since Dick Carl was just requesting a parking pad for him because of the steepness of the grade. Wheeler noted that he has the same hardship with the steepness of the grade and should be allowed to keep the gravel hardcover for his parking pad. Wheeler stated that Loth of his neighbors have put hardcover in between their homes to keep the water out of their basements. Wheeler stated that they will comply with Council Iswishes. Wheeler asked the Council what he should do. Acting Mayor Frahm stated that Wheeler would have to apply for a variance if he wishes to keep the parking pad. Frahm noted Wheeler's other choice is to remove the hardcover and comply with the previous variance conditions. Jerry Wheeler stated that the City does have the option of choosing which items that the Citywill request to apply for a variance. Wheeler noted that for two years he asked the City to respond to his complaint against his neighbor and the City was very slow in responding, but his neighbor makes a complaint against him and in two weeks the City is ready to take action against him. Wheeler asked if his complaint against his neighbor has been issued through the proper channels. Acting Mayor Frahm stated that the City wi 1.1 play by the book and require the applicant to comply with the conditions of the resolution or file for a variance:. Jerry Wheeler suggested that the Council not play by the book and if Dick Carl feels he has a legitimate complaint against him, then. let Carl take him to civil court. Councilmember L. Adams explained that regardless of Dick Carl's complaint this issue would have come before the City Council because Wheeler and George are in violation of the resolution they signed. Adams stated that he was on the Planning Commission at the time this variance was granted and that the Commission did a great deal of sole searching in order to grant. the 25' variance. Adams stated that. condition /3 in the resolution that was approved states "seeding of gravel drive prior to final inspection by MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII. MEETING HELD MAY 28, 1985. P-;E 11 building inspector" and condition 44 states "the City will 3399 CRYSTAL BAY approve no further variances for this property". Adams felt ROAD STATUS that the gravel drive on the west side of the house should be removed prior to final inspection by the building inspector. Councilmember T. Adams noted that the condition to remove the gravel was a primary condition and reason for the Council's approval. Jerry Wheeler noted that the final inspection has not been made yet because he has not quite finished the project. Wheeler asked the Council if he feels that he has a legitimate drainage problem and the gravel helps the problem can he not apply for a variance. City Attorney Radio noted that if an application was filed it would be a variance application to the original variance that was granted. Jerry Wheeler stated that if the City wants to stipulate that the City will take the legal liability if his truck rolls down the hill and kills someone or the liability for the water damage done to his basement he would feel differently. City Attorney Radio noted that these claims should have been brought up at the hearing of the original variance application. Building 6 Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that if there are drainage problems, then we should find out what is creating those problems. Mabusth advised that the burden is on the applicant to hire an engineer or whatever to determine the problem and a solution to the drainage problem. Council suggested Wheeler hire an engineer to make a recommendation for the drainage problem. Council noted that if Wheeler wishes the parking pad to stay that he must apply for a variance or else comply with the original condition of the resolution. Councilmember L. Adams noted his feelings on the water problem in the basement is that it is not going to be adversely affected if Wheeler removes the gravel area and sods the area. Adams stated that even with an engineer's report that claims the gravel area must stay to prevent water damage, it will be very hard to allow the gravel area to stay. Adams noted that the parkirg problem is different from the others neighbors. Adams noted that Wheeler has a three or four car garage and owns a bigger lot than most of his surrounding neighbors. Adams found it difficult to believe that the gravel slab is essential. Jerry Wheelet btated that even with a triple car garage, he has trouble in the winter time getting into the garage because of the steep incline. Wheeler stated that he did add gravel next to the house and it alleviated the water problem in his L•asement . MINUTES OF THE RI:GUL.AR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HE1,IU MAY 28, 1985. PAGE 12 STATUS REPORT ON 2695 CASCO POINT ROAD* Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember T. Adams seconded, to accept staf f ' s status report on 2695 Casco Point Road. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). CITE ENGINEER'S REPORT PLANS - OVERLAY ON WILLOW DRIVE i OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD City Engineer Cook reviewed with the Council the plans and specs fer the Willow Drive and Old Crystal Bay Road overlay project. Acting Mayor Frahm reminded staff that the culverts on Willow and Watertown Road should be fixed to solve one citizens problem with traffic shaking the home. Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember T. Adams seconded, to approve the pans and specs for the Willow Drive and Old Crystal Bay Road overlay project. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). RELEASE FOR BIDS Acting Mayer Fra- loved, Councilmember T. Adams seconded, to direct staff to ._lease the project for bids, Motion, Ayes (,.), Nays (0). CABLE TV REPORT There was no cable TV report. TRANSPORTATION REPORT There was no transportation report. LIVINGSTON AVENUE DRAINAGE PROBLRA* Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember T. Adams seconded, to accept the Livingston Avenue drainage problem complaint and asked that staff investigate the matter. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). RESOLUTION %1769 RELEASE OF TAX FORFEIT LAND FOR SALE City Administrator Bernhardson noted six parcels of land that Koehnen wishes to repurchase together with his agreement to combine those parcels. Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to approve Resolution #1769, A Resolution Approving the release of tax forfeit land for sale. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). PET1TION FOR STOP SIGN AT CASCO POINT ROAD L DUNWOODY Gail Nafus of 2580 Dunwoody Avenue was present . Nafus stated that she circulated the petition already submitted to the "ity and received many signatures of people in favor of a stop sign at Casco Point Road and Dunwoody Avenue. Nafus MINUTES OF THE RFWULAN ORONO rOJNCII, MEETING HELD MAY 28, 1985. PAGE. 13 emphasized the dangerous condi.t ion at this intersection and asked Council to consider ordering a stop sign to be located there. Nafus also requested a "slow children" sign because of the dangerous situation with speeding cars and the children in the neighborhood. City Administrator Bernhardson noted that this was an issue with the City in 1979 and the outcome was a reduction in the speed limit of 30 to 25 in that area. Bernhardson stated that the City needs to review the area and then come back to Council with a recommendation. Bernhardson suggested that Council just accept the petition tonight and staff will submit a recommendation at the June 24, 1985, Council meeting. Gail Nafus asked that the City expedite their revie of the area and felt that one monthwas too long to wait. Nafus felt that monitoring the traffic will not reveal anything new. Co+incilmember I,. Adams suggested holding a public hearing regarding the issue. City Administrator Bernhardson stated that staff will schedule a public hearing for June 24, 1985 regarding the request from the petition. PETITION NORTH SHORE DRIVE - PARKING PROBLEM Joe Bau of 3444 North Shore Drive, James Erler of 3448 North Shore Drive, W.C. Odden of 3450 North Shore Drive, R.S. Prochnon of 3440 North Shore Drive, anc Dan Regan of 3410 North Shore Drive were present from the audience regarding this petition. City Administrator Bernhardson stated that this petition was received at the last Council meeting. Bernhardson stated that the petition addresses pedestrian and bicyclist safety, trespassing, and disturbing the peace. Bernhardson noted that. the City received a petition in 1982 to post no parking signs but the request was denied by the City. Bernhardson noted that the City is concerned with the elimination of 25 parking slots along the lake for vehicular and trailer parking since the DNR requires 700 public parking spaces around the lake and elimination of the 25 parking spaces would require the City to allocate those 25 slots elsewhere. The five gentlemen from North Shore Drive expressed their concerns regarding the pedestrians and bicyclist on the bike path. They noted that they have constant problems with trespassers onto their private properties and also fisherman who even fish off their docks. They stated that emergency vehicles have had trouble getting through this area when the parking lot and road slots are full as there was nc. area to pull off the travelled portions of road. The neighbors noted that there have been many serious accidents in the area and the area has a safety problem. MINUTFS OF I111" REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MI:E'TING ►11:I,D MAY 28, 1985. PAGE 14 City Administrator Bernhardson suggested delaying action on the petition until staff can work with the DNR and Hennepin County regarding the no parking signs. Bernhardson noted that Hennepin County wlil not take any action unless the City recommends something. .Acting Mayor Frahm explained to the neighbors that the DNR requires all cities to provide public access to the lake. Frahm stated that if the City fpiis to provide these public accesses the DNR could condemn property for the access. Frahm explained that staf f needs to work with the DNR before the City can take any action on this petition. Councilmember L. Adams suggested that staff look into the possibility of placing a public dock onto the North Arm landing to eliminate the problem of the f ishermen seeking out private docks to do their fishing. SENIOR CITI?EN SPECIAI. ASSESSMENT 'DEFERMENT City Administrator Bernhardson a%plained that five years ago the City of Orono adopted a resolution giving special assessment deferment options to senior citizens. Bernhardson stated that this is the fifth year of that agreement and the Council must decide whether to make such a program renewable. Bernhardson noted present county guidelines and since those guildelines were last acted on in 1979 it should be appropriate at this time to update those guidelines. Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to make the special assessment deferment option renewable for senior citizens fo► a five year period and to adopt Hennepin County's guidelines. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). REQUEST FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION City Administrator Bernhardsor.requested the Council enter into executive session after the regular Council meeting has adjourned. BOARD OF RE'V I EW MAY 30, 1985 City Administrator Bernhardson reminded the Council that the Board of Review meeting wi 11 be held on May 30, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. in the Art Center. FENCE ON SHORELINE DRIVE City Administrator Bernhardson stated that Hennepin County is exploring the right of way issue with the fence. Bernhardson noted a letter that Building Zoning Administrator Mabusth had written to George Rovegnv at 2010 Shoreline Drive. Art Tourangeau of 2060 Spates Avenue and Terry Morse of 2000 Spates Avenue were present. Tourangeau expressed his concern with the fence location and his view of the lake. MINUTE'S OF THE REGUI.AR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING IIKILU MAY 28, 1985. PAGE 15 HENNEPIN COUNTY JOTECH PROPERTY City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the VoTech proposes a horse training facility in the City of Medina with access onto Homestead Trail a Hennepin County Road. Bernhardson stated that the VoTech might request hookups to the sewer and water lines to Orono. Bernhardson stated that it is his. understanding that if VoTech cannot get the hookups, that they propose an on -site septic system. Bernhardson stated that the proposal has passed the Planning Commission level in Medina and will be presented to the Medina Council next Monday. Bernhardson stated that some of the surrounding residents are concerned with traffic and potential pollution. Bernhardson asked for direction from Council about allocating potential sewer units for this use. Councilmember T. Adams stated that it is hard to argue against this type of land use since it seems logical to locate a horse training facility there. Adams stated that the residents are concerned with the ultimate level of the VoTech facility and potential location of the whole VoTech facility. Acting Mayor Frahm advised staff to allocate no units until the study of Highway 12 is completed. Frahm noted that the City will probably not allocate its own units for a Medina protect since Orono is limited in its own number of units. City Engineer Cook stated that he had heard that VoTech wanted to hookup to Orono's lines but actually get the units from the City of Long Lake. City Administrator Bernhardson stated that Long Lake has also asked Orono if they can hookup to the Orono section of the lines for the Robb Motel project but allocate the units from Long Lake. Bernhardson noted that he will bring this back June 10, 1985 when he gets more information regarding this project. LOGIS OPEN HOUSE City Administrator Bernhardson reminded the Council of the LOGIS open house to be held May 29 6 30 from 1-5:30 p.m. RESOLUTION FOR DEFERRYU COMi'ENSATION City Administrator Bernhardson noted that at the last Council meeting, Council passed a resolution for deferred compensation and the agency came back and asked that another form of the same resolution be adopted. Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember T. Adams seconded, to approve the changed form for the deferred compensation. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 28, 1985. PAGE16 BIG ISLAND UPDATE City Administrator Bernhardson stated that the State Legislature has passed that the title will not pass until August 15. Bernhardson noted that staff has posted all the buildings and sent notices to the State Commissioner of Veterans Affairs that the buildings must be boarded up and absent that, the City can do the work and can assess it against the Department of Veterans Affairs. Bernhardson noted that a meeting will be held Thursday with the Board of Governors to show them exactly what must be done with each cabin. Bernhardson stated that the Board of Governors will have to then make a decision whether to correct the violations, tear the buildings down, or sell. Bernhardson stated that they must make public notice to any interested public agencies that may be interested in buying. Bernhardson explained that in order to expedite the corrections, the City will start hazardous building procedures. COUNCIL POLLS Councilmember L. Adams felt that no more telephone Council polls should be done by staff and felt that it was an improper procedure and should not be used. Adams stated that this procedure should be avoided. City Attorney Radio agreed noting that at times it may be a violation of the open meeting law. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT STATUS REPORT AT 130 CYGNET PLACE City Attorney Radio updated the Council that the property still has not been cleaned up at 130 Cygnet Place and he is proceeding with a criminal complaint. LICENSES* Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember T. Adams seconded, to approve the following licenses: Jimmies Lounge - Liquor License Renewal (on -sale) Long Lake Chamber of Commerce - Special Events permit Arnold Carlson - trapping permit Westonka Sewer 6 Water - Septic System Installer License Westonka Sanitation - Garbage Haulers License Alan Penke - Solicitors Permit Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). BILLS* Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember T. Adams seconded, that the All Fund6 Accounts and Liquor Store Accounts be paid. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). ADJOURNMENT 10:10 PM Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to adjourn the regular Council meeting at 10:30 p.m. and enter into executive session. Motion, Ayes ( 3) , Nays (0) . ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerki� Thomas M. Frahm, Acting Mayor MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 2, 1985. PAGE I ATTENDANCE The Orono Park Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Peterson, Stinson, Kelley, Erger, Bradley, Kienzler and Kost. Secretary Sweatt was ab- sent. Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson represented the City staff. INTRODUCTION OF NEW MEMBERS The following new members were introduced: Phil Bradley, Marianne Kienzler and Bob Kost. STUBBS'S BAY There was discussion concerning a structure on Stubb's Bay Road that has been donated to the City. Members were asked to try and come up with uses for this structure since it does have historical value. Discussion of places which would be appropriate for the building included: should it be moved to the school COUNCIL MEETING campus area? uses as a library? would Hennepin County be interested? what would the JUN 101985 cost be to move the structure? should it go to Bederwood Park? Is there funding available to renovate the structure? Members were asked ��y C OF ORQNO to think of different organizations which might be willing to donate funds. At the next meeting, the Commission should consider a recommendation to the Council as to what should be done with the donated structure. The building is on the corner of Stubb's Bay Road and Watertown Road. It is currently located on property donated to the University of Minnesota. GREENWAY SOCIETY A brief description of the Greenway Society was given to each member. Members were asked to read it over before the next meeting. Mr. Surrey Gage, an active member of the Society will be asked to speak at the next meeting regarding this group, to give us an in depth picture of this groups activities. CITY PARKS Joh,, Gerhardson showed the new members the location and what was available at each City park. Swimming beaches were included in the introduction. PARK FACILITY TOURS Plans w,!re initiated to have a joint "get- together" with the Council, Planning Commis- sion and Park Commission as well as members of the City staff to tour each park facility. A tentative date was set for June 4, 1985 at 6 P.M. Finalization of these plans will be made a a later date. MINUTES OF THE PARR COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 2, 1985. PAGE 2 NOERENHERG COUNTY PARK Information regarding a special advisory com- mittee put together by the County was noted. The final draft of this committee's work is available at the City officies. Any in- terested Park Commission Members were informed that they could obtain a copy through the City. DATE SET FOR NEXT MEETING The next meeting was scheduled for May 7, 1985 at 7 P.M. All members were asked to attend. MEETING ADJOURNED MJNUTES OF THE PARR COMMISSION MEETING HEL.I MAY 7, 1985. PAGE 1 ATT?NDANCE The Orono Park Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Peterson and Stinson. Members Kienzler, Bradley, Kost, Kelley, Erger and Sweatt were absent. City Administrator Bernhardson and Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson re- presented the City staff. MEETING ADJOURNED Since enough members were not present for a quorum, the meeting was adjourned. Consideration of a special meeting was discussed. Reminder notices will be mailed out before the next meeting to all members. To: Orono Council Members From: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator Date: June 7, 1985 Subject: Park Tour - June 18, 6 P.M. The Park Commission has scheduled a tour of the Orono Park System beginning at 6 p.m. on June 18, 1985. The tour will begin at the Orono Council Chambers. The Westonka Senior Citizens have donated the use of their new van and a drive. The van has a capacity for 20 people. Please contact me if you wish to attend. COUNCia. IMMING JUN 101985 CITY OF ORONO It To: Orono Council Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator Date: June 6, 1985 Subject: Jon Scherven, 2649 Casco. Point Road #908 Variance; #924 Conditional Use Permit - Resolutions List -of Exhibits Exhibit A - Council Minutes From May 28, 1985 Exhibit B - Revised Plans The applicant has revised his plans so that the entryway to the house is open directly to both floors with no interior doors. He also has redesigned the deck so that no portion of it extends into the 0-75' setback zone nor outside the extended side lines of the existing house. Based on Counci l's 3-0 vote of conceptual approval on May 28, 1985, subject to the above conditions being fulfilled, staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit and average setback variance per the attached resolutions. COUNCIL MEETING JUN 101.85 CITY OF ORM rvv" IT 4-- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL, MEETING HELD MAY 28, 1985. PAGE #908 i #924 JON SCHERVEN 2649 CASCO POINT RD (#908) VARIANCE - RESOLUTION (#924) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION Jon Scherven was present with his father A.W. Scherven. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that the applicant proposes to build a two story addition over the existing concrete slab and deck on the lake side of his parents home. Gaffron noted that the applicant proposes hardcover tradeoffs, and that the proposed deck does extend into the 75' setback zone. Gaffron stated that the conditional use permit is required because the applicant is requesting to use the basement as a guest apartment for his parents who are retiring. Gaffron noted that applicant does propose a kitchen in the basement but has agreed that the second dwelling unit would never be rented out. Gaffron noted the Planning Commission did approve the application subject to the following regarding the guest apartment use: 1 ) apartment for use of family members only; 2 ) apartment use may not be conveyed to a purchaser; 3 ) guest apartment may not be rented out and such to be confirmed by staff yearly; 4 ) use is subject to City review at end of four years. Acting Mayor Frahm asked if a separate entrance is proposed for the guest apartment use. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that the main entrance would be used, but that once inside the main entrance, a door leading to the basement and a door leading to the upstairs is proposed. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that the Council did recently approve the Beck conditional use permit which is similar to this application. Councilmember L. Adams felt that the lot is really too small to support another dwelling unit. Jon Scherven explained that his parents have tried to sell the home and have not been able to. Scherven stated that he has offered to buy the home, remodel it, and then they would be able to live in the basement. Scherven confirmed that he wi 11 agree to any stipulat ions the Counci 1 wishes to place on the guest apartment use. Counci lmember Frahm noted his concern for the f uture when the Schervens move out and the future owner may try to rent out the apartment. Frahm noted it is hard for staff to police such a use. Jon Scherven responded that the neighborhood would probably police itself. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING IIF I.D MAY 28, ] 98 , . PAGE Councilmember L. Adams suggested a compromise with one kitchen. Jon Scherven noted that one kitchen would be very inconvenient for all living there. City Attorney noted that the resolution could be written in a manner in which the parents would have no vested rights. Councilmember Frahm stated that the entrance to the home should appear as any other single family residence. Frahm stated that the two doors inside the main entrance should be eliminated so that it does not seem that there are two dwelling units. Frahm noted that he has a problem with the deck extending into the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone. Councilmember L. Adams suggested an alternate plan to give the entrance a more open view and appear as one single family residence. Jon Scherven noted that with this plan it would not be very energy efficient with one door in the winter time. Councilmember L. Adams noted that the current proposal is a potential duplex plan. Council suggested tabling the application to allow the applicant time to redesign his plan. Jon Scherven explained that he is trying to sell his home in Mound and has a purchaser ready to buy if this application is approved. Scherven stated that he isn't sure if the purchaser will wait for two weeks for an answer. Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to conceptually approve the conditional use permit and variance application but to table application until June 10, 1985, and further directs staff to redraft resolution and applicant to redesign and submit his plan reflecting the following: 1. Deck and steps to remain outside of the 0-75' setback zone and not to extend beyond the side boundaries of the home. 2. Council will grant Conditional Use Permit for a guest apartment use if applicant redesigns proposal to eliminate doors and walls separating the basemt�nt and upstairs to give the entrance an open appearance. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). 1 EXHIBIT ..._ ::%� s - �' � �T*.1 sY. .:. ...•�. ��..wRr� �► � • ������, iZ:.�stQ� t • •��� .�lXYt �.l-'?���?.��..j..,,yy .. :, T t..t � . �clfea..i�e�.e s �1:'t..��-r•.�.r %F�: 's" Y L �.,1 Yi+ M f —♦ •� ` �� t••,A/�`l.A.� .•' _ _���:.� _ t jL:,,�Cd13i�"Ay"' - .� t "' ~ '�� fit! — — -- _ yrrd �. 1 . .. ,-.r,.,_. __ _ _ ...._ t �:._,i --;r-e.a•.�. ___ __:pis - - - ----_. wQ_.__..�� r r-Jf EXH181T • (. e• cwr..y v .!�0N Y•w•..Cf.. j • � y..tKF �� 1 i ��''�%� ( �• MRf•+M V( Mkt �4M ✓�••. � � �� .fir. � � 1 .• ..f. r•61. • -it,LLIV•�1'd .i E . � Y - 1• h.•� uveaw. . . - T- lA . d City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 FILE #908 WHEREAS, Jon Scherven (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 2649 Casco Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 138, Spring Park (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to permit the construction of an addition to his existing house, which addition will encroach 8 feet into the required average lakeshore setback area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #908. 2. The property is located in the LR-lC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 15, 1985, and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the f( -)wing findings: A) Applicant has a, to remove 190 square feet of hardcover in the 7`, 50' setback zone, which is an equivalent amount of hardcover to the portions of deck proposed in the 75'-250' setback zone. B) The proposed addition wi 11 be placed over an area of existing hardcover in the 75'-250' setback zone. C) There wi l l be no net increase of hardcover in the 75'-250' setback z(:ne. Existing and proposed hardcover in the 75'-250' zone- is "Ilho square feet or 44%. Page I of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. D) The portions of deck originally proposed to be constructed in the 0-75' setback zone comprise 98 square feet on 2.2% hardcover. Applicant has no addi- tional existing hardcover in the 0-75' or 75'-250' setback zone which can be feasibly removed to offset this 98 square feet. The applicant has subsequently revised his plans so that no portion of the deck wi 11 extend into the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone or past the extended side lines of the existing house. E) Hardships to the property are the locations of the existing house and the neighboring houses in relation to the lakeshore, and the small existing lot size (11,800 square feet). F) The adjacent propert. owners have expressed approval of the proposed plans, and find thet no views will be encroached upon by this addition. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the condit existing on this property are peculiar to it and do r. ,,,,Iy generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a f,.re hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to pre- serve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision I to permit the construction of an addition to his existing house, which addition will encroach 8 feet into the required average setback area. Page 2 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCiL NO. he applicant shall remove hardcover concurrently with addition, as follows: Concrete slab Sidewalk blocks adjacent to Portions of paved driveway 190 square feet of existing the con:' fiction of the garage apron Total square feet - iu square feet - 84 square feet ---------------- 190 square feet 2. This approval is based upon the revised plans submitted by the applicant indicating an open entry way without separate entry doors for each floor level, and deck not extending into the 0-75' setback zone nor extendinq outside the existing side lines of the house. 3. The applicant is advised that the City will not approve any future improvements that result in additional hardcover and that if such improvements are proposed that they be counter -ba1ar.ced with the removal of existing hardcover. 4. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (June 10, 1986). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and here- by agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this loth day of June, 1985. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor ( 1 ) Property owner Page 3 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO, STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of __, 1985 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the forggoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 1985, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (the:..r) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 4 of 4 City of OR,ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE AND CONDITIONAI, USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 3 (G) FILE NO. 924 WHEREAS, Jon Scherven (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 2649 Casco Point Road located within the City of Orono (hereafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 138, Spring Park (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a Conditional Use Permit to permit the creation of a temporary guest apartment within the walkout level of the existing house at 2649 Casco Point Road by constructing separate kitchen facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File No. 924. 2. The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The property is approximately 0.27 acres in area. 4. On hpri l 15, 1985 and May 20, 1985 the Orono Planning Comm -n reviewed the application and recommended approval of t posed variance to the 1 acre lot area requirement for L- temporary second dwelling unit per Zoning Code Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (A)(7), and recommended approval of a conditional use permit for the temporary guest apartment, subject to the following conditions: a) The guest apartment is for use of family members only. b) This guest apartment use may not be conveyed to a purchaser of the property. c) The guest apartment may notbe rented out and such to be confirmed by staff yearly. d) This use is subj(<ct to City review at the end of four years. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5. The City Council f inds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district: that 'granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6. The City Counci 1 f inds that granting a Condi tiona 1 Use Permit will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neigh- `-loring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding pr.o- erty values and the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 7. The City Council has considered this application in- cluding the findings and recommendations of the Planning Corrinission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a Variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.20, Subdivision 3(G) to allow installation of kitchen facilities to create a second dwelling unit on a lot of area 0.27 acres where 1.0 acre is required for a second dwelling unit, and grants a Conditional Use Permit for temporary use of said unit as a guest apartment subject to the following conditions: 1. Use of the guest apartment unit is limited to family members only. 2. This conditional use permit may not be conveyed or transferred to any purchaser of the property. 3. The guest apartment unit may not be rented out. 4. This conditional use permit is subject to review at the end of four years (May 28, 1989) and subject to yearly staff confirmation of thy• use. Pages 2 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5. This approval is based upon the revised plans submitted by the applicant which indicate an open entry way without separate entry doors for each floor level. 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. The undersigned owner has -ead, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this loth day of June, 1985. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Property Owner(s) Property Owner(s) Page 3 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF NENNEPIN ) On this day of 1985 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF NENNEPIN ) On this day of , 1985, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me tc. be the persons) described in and who executed the foregoinginstrument, and acknowledged that he (trey) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMtI:'SION EXPIRES Id ? TO: City Council FROM: Michael P. Gaftron, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE: June 4, 1985 SUBJECT: #910 James Hoff, 2056 Shadywood Road - Conditional Use Permit Zoning District - LR-IC Application - Regrade Lakeshore Yard of Property, All.Within 0-75' Setback Area Existing Grade - Uniform Slope of about 38% from high plateau down to lake Proposed Grade - 2 4 - 3 0 % slope COUNCIL MEETING List of Exhibits !J!1 101C";;5 Exhibit A - Application CITY �F G�,JONND Exhibit B - Plat Map 1 Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey with existing and proposed contours Exhibit E - Planning Commission Minutes 5-20-85 The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow him to regrade the lakeshore of his property so that it conforms more to the properties on either side of him. Most of the work proposed is within the 0-75' setback area. His existing slope is about 38% according to the existing grade topographic submittal. The proposal would decrease the slope to about 25% on the average, but would eliminate the flat plateau which currently acts as runoff percolation area. City Engineer, Glenn Cook, has reviewed the proposal and made these comments: 1. The proposed contours as shown do not accomplish the stated purpose of conforming to the neighboring property contours. Note that the property to the north has extensive retaining walls. How will the grading conform to these? On the south side, where slopes are less severe, it would likely require less removal of material to conform to the neighboring grades. 2. The proposed grade changes will eliminate the existing 30-40' "plateau" area of 68 slopes or less, which now functions as slow - runoff and infiltration area, and change the entire lakeshoreyard to slopes of 24-30%. From a runoff infiltration standpoint., this is not necessarily a beneficial project. One-third of the lakeshore yard which formerly had relatively good infiltration characteristics will be reduced in infiltration capacity. #910 Hoff Page 2 June 4, 1985 From a maintenance standpoint, the applicant is correct in that the flatter grades will mak^ maintenance easier. The "safer access" concern may be valid, but with a minimum slope of 25% after the propo5t'd grading, a stairway will likely still be the preferfed method of getting to the lake. When you review this site, it may be Helpful in your visualizing of the proposal that the final grade at the point where the steep slope starts downward will be 6' below that point in the area midway between the side property lines. During the Planning Commission review it became clear that the originally proposed contours do not reflect what the applicant wants to do because at the time they were proposed he had not discussed this project with his neighbors. He has since then approached the neighbors and he plans to submit a revised grading plan for the City Engineer's review, showing a blending in with the neighboring properties, possibly some removal of retaining walls by the neighbor to the north. These revised plans have not yet been submitted for review. Please review the May 2C, 1985, Planning Commission minutes. Planning Commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit application for regrading of the lakeshore yard, based on the following findings: 1. Applicant's lakeshore yard will conform better to the neighbors yards and will look more aesthetically pleasing. 2. Proposal will reduce degree of hazardous condition existing on the property because of the slope of the land and will improve the health, safety and welfare of the applicant's yard and neighborhood. 3. Applicant's lakeshore yard previously existed as the proposal now shows and previous owner built hill back up again, thereby creating extra hardship on current owner for maintenance of yard. Appt (,val would be subject to the following conditions: 1. Regrading to be done under close supervision with staff and City Engineer to assure that proposed contours will blend with the neighbors yards. 2. City to require that the applicant have this grading done professionally and not by the applicant. 3. Proper erosion controls to be approved and supervised by staff. #910 hof f Page 3 June 4, 1985 4. If applicant proposes steps or a stairway to the lakeshore, applicant may not exceed existing steps or existing amount of hardcover. Based on the recommendation of the Planning Commission, you have three options if you look favorably on this project: 1. Approve with the condition that the City Engineer review and approve the final grading plans (draft resolution attached). 2. Conceptually approve and table subject to staff review of the revised plans; or 3. Table pending receipt of staff review of proposed plans. CITY OF ORONO�., GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Site ;%d d r e s s 205.6 Shadywood Road Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 17-117-23 310014 Please check one - Is the property abstract or torren_.? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included or, required survey. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name James L. Hoff Phone 471 9416 Mailing Address 2056 Shadywood Rd., Wayzata, No. 55391 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- OWNER Name James L. Hoff Phone 471-9416 Mailing Address 2056 Shadywood Rd., Wayzata, Mn. 55391 Date Property Acquired __ Marab 1985 (month/year ) I (1W) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- FEES - CONDITIUNAI. USE ?E1041TS $100.00 o) Residential accesscry Us(- $150.00 1,) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $25C.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use A $200.00 f) Land Alteration (grading, filling) J ) " I J PRU/PID - f.E'E' fee schedule Other Applications $250.00 Vacation $250.00 lie zonirig $.00.00 Appeals .�r.croti7rg-,� r APR 1 ,93, othcr - see fev schedule 1..GSENT USE OF PRO11Ek7'Y Present 'Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS I. Completed Application form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list f rom Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) s . Stamped, legal sized envelopes (110) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Construction plans, if applicable. 6. Plat v.. -). ------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- The :,pplicant and . operty Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. ---------------------------------------- APPLICANT' S SIG:1A1'Ukr' The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certif ies that the information supplied is true and correct to the Jb o�is/her kn4y�edge. Applicant's signa OWNERS SIGNATURE I/ Date f�1 The owner herby a nowledges and agrees to tt, pplication and further authorizes re 1 n� onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission m mbers, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of his r quest. Owner's signature _ Date / �9 Applicant mutt yr all sut�mittals into the City offices 25 days-LcIoLe the leienn•ing Commission Meetinyl Plnnning Commission Meeting% are held tm the -third V . ' r t-' t 3,r! wi 39 1A • ' 2l No 51 1 } kD w. ! \Gp c i ✓ bl' s 1 •, ��:, - , Uf MC toe .,C its •' ` E,Dlock H,Tornplt of Longdor Pork GI v OF3� (I`�±1 i orNedl CITY OF ORONO w � 27 \ 2 3 4 25 � I 2s { v ty4) I• r °�� r� �� J6 • N.�•blre , 23, cro 1 Y 21 t` / +•�+ , \� s JI 1 � . � i h L • ,I �• I l••: � � w '��l1� , S /�� �/L/ _ 2C, e,�`1 tw F / �^` t t. o ,v All w n i ' V� • Q I t_..•+•—'' i �ssl�r L•�-:''. �'► �' V NOR, T�ERN .. RUN DATE 03/28/85 BATCH 001 17 17-117-23 31 0003 PROP ADDR 03745 SUNSET OR OWNER NAME R 0 NAEGELE ETAL TAXPAYER ROBERT 0 NAEGELE NAME/ADDR 3746 SUNSET DRIVE SPRING PARK MN 55384 38 17-117-23 24 0027 PROP ADDR 01990 SHADYWOOD RD OWNER NAME PETER GLINT TAXPAYER PETER GLINT NAME/ADDR 1990 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 1 117-23 31 0002 PROP ADDR 0201f ;HADYW000 RD 0;:NER NAME M P OER ETAL TAXPAYER MICHAEL P LANGNER NAME/ADDR 2016 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 33 17-117-23 3: 0013 PROP ADCR 0�040 SIIADYW00D RD OWNER NAME JOHN F SCHOLL ETAL TAXPAYER JOHN F SCHOLL NAME/ADDR 2040 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 39 17-117-23 31 0016 PROP ADDR 02080 SHADYWOOD RD OWNER NAME R W CARLSEN ETAL TAXPAYER ROBERT W CARLSON tIAI*E/ADDR 2080 SHAOY14000 RD WAYZATA MN 55391 36 17-117-23 31 ocvl PRCP ADDR 02100 SHADYWOOD PD UWNER NAME R A P ALBEWISUN TAXPAYER ROBERT V ALBERI`.:ON NAME/ADDR 2100 `iHADvW000 RD WAYZATA HN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 17 17-117-23 31 0045 03703 SUNSET DR THE SOUTHLAND COPP THE SOUTHLA14D COPP 2828 N HASKEL DALLAS TX 75204 38 17-117-23 24 0028 01998 5HAUYWJO0 RD 0 A S BOLL DOUGLAS E A SA14URA E BOLL 1990 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA M11 55391 38 17-117-23 31 0011 02024 SHADYWOOD RD ALBERTA G MELBY ALBERTA G MELBY 2024 SIiADYW000 RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 31 0014 02056 SHADYWOOD RD J A A HOFF JAMES L HOFF 2056 SHADYW000 RD RONO MN 55391 38 17-117-23 31 0026 STATE LAND DEPT CITY OF OROt10 X ALBERTA M STROM CITY CLERK ORONO MN 55391 38 17-117-23 31 0042 02092 Sl1ADYW00D RD GRACE LEE DAHL GRACE LEE DAHL 2092 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA 11H 55391 REPORT ': PI435401 PA_E 1 3T 17-117-23 24 0026 01978 SHADYWOOD RD GE03GE J HAENf ETAL GEORGE J HAENY 1978 51!AOYWOOD RD WAYZATA MH 55391 38 17-117-23 31 0001 02000 SHADYWOOD RD JOHN C WELLS ETAL GLADYS WELLS 2000 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 31 0012 02032 SHADYWOOD RD R A R POTAS RONALD F POTAS 2032 SH40(WOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 31 0015 02064 SHADYWOOO RD NEIL R BLESI ETAL MR HEIL R BLESI 2064 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MIN 55391 38 17-117-23 31 0031 .- X uj STATE LAND DEPT CITY OF ORONO X ALBERTA M STFOM CITY CLERK ORONO MN 55391 )8 17-117-23 31 0044 OZ117 SHADYWOOD RD DAVID S DECKER DAVID S BECKER 2117 SHADYWOOO RD ORONO MN 55391 I fI RUN DATE 03/28/85 BATCH 001 38 17-117-23 42 0017 PROP ADOR 02106 SHADYWOOD RD OWNER NAME W JP i G SIME TAXPAYER WILLIAM J SINE JR NAME/ADOP 2106 SHADYW000 ROAD WAYZATA MN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST TOTAL BATCH 001 00019 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 2 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE 44 Y MINUTES OF THE. ORONO PLANNING COMMIS )ION MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1985. PAGI: 6 # 910 JA1 ES HOFF 2056 SHADYWOOD ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 9:18 - 9:26 PM James Hoff was present. Mark Gronberg, •surveyor, was present. Chairman Callahan called for the public hearing concerning Hoff's conditional u::e permit application to regrade his lakeshore yard. Assistant Zoning Adminis- trator Gaffron noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. Neil & Jan ,Blesi of 2064 Shadywood Road were present from the audience for this public hearing. James Hoff explained his proposal to grade his lakeshore yard to match his neighbors yard. Hoff explained that there is a safety factor when he tries to maintain his yard and is very dangerous. Hoff noted that he plans to extend the contours of his neighbors to his own yard. - Kelley asked if the applicant plans on removing the retaining wall. Hoff confirmed that he will remove the retaining wall. Hoff stated the the proposed improvements wi 11 improve the saf ety of the bank. Neil Blesi of 2064 Shadywood Road noted that the proposal will greatly improve the looks of the applicant's lakeshore yard and will reduce the degree of existing hazard. Blesi noted that the previous owner had regraded the lakeshore yard and because of lack of family support built the hill back up again. Blesi noted that the applicant's yard had previously been the same contours that were proposed. Assistant Zoning Administrat ron noted that according to the City Engineer that the p,,,pused contours as shown wi 11 not accomplish the applicant's objective. Chairman Callahan felt that the Planning Commission needs more information to determine if the proposal meets the applicant's objective. Callahan closed the public hearing at 9:26 p.m. Sine noted that the plan is not complete and is difficult to see where the contours will be. Sime noted that when the lakeshore area is graded that the applicant sod the ground right .,way to prevent erosion into the lake. Sime moved, Kelley seconded, to recommend approval of the conditional use permit application of James Hof f to allow the grading of his lakeshore yard based on the following findings: 1. Applicant's lakeshore yard will conform better to the neightors yards and wi l l l(.)ok more ,lest het i c. MINUTE:, OF 'I'll, cal; NI) I'LANNING COMMASSION MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1985. PAGE 7 2. Proposal will reduce degree of hazardous condition existing on the property because of the slope of the land and will improve the health, safety, and welfare of the applicant's yard and neighborhood. 3. Applicant's lakeshore yard previously existed as the proposal now shows and previous owner built hill back up again thereby creating extra hardship on current owner for maintenance of yard. Approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Regrading to be done under close supervision with staff and City Engineer to assure that proposed contours will blend with the neighbors yards. 2. City to require that the applicant have this grading done professionally and not by the applicant. 3. Proper erosion controls to be approved and supervised by staff . 4. If applicant proposes steps or a stairway to the lakeshore, applicant may not exceed existing steps or existing amount of hardcover. Motion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). #912 GORDON HEDLUND 3990 NORTH SHORE DRIVE VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 9:44-10:05PM Gordon Hedlund was present. Chairman Callahan called for the publichearing for Gordon Hedlund's variance application to permit the construction of a new residence. Building & Zoning Adninistrator Gaffron noted the affidavit of publicatio-i and the certificate of mailing. Robert & Sue Bilger 4005 North Shore Drive ware present from the audiciice for this public hearing. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that the lot i!: partially located within the I.R-lC and LR-1B zoning district. Gaffron noted that Planning Commission should decide f irr,t what zoning district standards should apply to this application. Kelley asked about. the surrounding lots in the neighborhood and felt that the zoning should match the surrounding lots. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that the surrounding lots are mostly half -acre. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAI. ZONING CODE SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8, AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAI, ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 - FILE 910 WHEREAS, James Hoff (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 2056 Shadywood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 8 and the Southerly half of Lot 7, Gust S, Johnson's Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit and variance to permit the regrading of the lakeshore yard within the 0-75' protected lakeshore area per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03 , Subdivision 19, requesting a variance to Section 10.55, Subdivision 8. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1.. This application was reviewed as zoning file #910. 2. The property is located in the LR-IC Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 20, 1985, and recommended approval making the following findings: 1. Applicant's lakeshore yarn will conform better to the neighbors yard and will appear more aesthetically pleasing. 2. Proposal will reduce the uegree of hazardous condition existing on the property because of the slope of the land and will improve the health, safety, and welfare of the applicant's yard and neighborhood. 3. Applicant's lakeshore yard previously had been filled, a,id the proposal is to return the grade to nearer its original state, thereby reducing hardship on the current owner for maintenance of the yi+rd. Pays• I of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4. The City Council has considered this application includi.-!a the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow to regrading of the lakeshore yard will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; and is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above f indings, the Orono City Counci 1 hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section10.55, Subdivision 8, and a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to permit the regrading of the lakeshore yard at 2056 Shadywocd Road, subject to the following conditions: 1. City Engineer shall approve final grading plans pi _or to issuance of the actual grading permit. 2. Regrading shall be done under close supervision of staff and City Engineer to assure that proposed contours wi 11 blend with the neighbors' yards. 3. The applicant shall have t'llis grading done professionally and not by the applicant. 4. A silt fence sedimentation barrier shall be installed prior to and maintained in place during the regrading process. P,.igo� 2 ()f 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5. The grading work shall take place within a single 24 hour period and the entire lakeshore yard shall be sodded within the immediate following 24 hour period in order to minimize any erosion into the lake. 6. Any new steps or stairway constructed to replace the existing steps shall not exceed the area or hardcover of the existing steps. 7. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the owner, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a grading permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date ( , 19 ). 8. Violation of or noncompliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 9. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the r_!cording of this resolution in the chain of title of the piuperty. 19 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this day of ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor (1) Property Owner Spouse Page 3 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this _ _ day of _ 1985 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeareO known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. rOI1NTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of _ _ , 1985, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person s) described in and�wh0 executed the foregoinginstrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC ' MY COMMIS`::ION F.X�'IRF:s Page 4 of 4 To: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator From: Michael P. G: -on, Assistant Zoning Administrator Date: June 6, 1985 Subject: #912 Gordon Hedlund, 3990 North Shore Drive - Variance Mr. Hedlund called me today at 11:15 and requested that his application be tabled pending further information he expects to receive from the County Transportation Department regarding their possible acquisition of a larger portion of this property. He expects further information in two weeks and would be rescheduled for June 24 or July 8. I explained to him that based on the Planning Commission recommendation and the City's past policy on applications such as this, information that the County wishes to purchase the property would not likely affect the Council's action if a denial is in order, and it certainly wouldn't help his case for approval. However, he insisted that he would rather table until he heard back from the County, so I agreed to tabling, and he will get back to me on the 13th or 14th of June. COUNCIL POEETING 11UN 101085 CITY OF ORONO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato DATE: June 6, 1985 Forwarded recommending delay. Attempting to inform interested parties. COUNCIL MEETING To: Mayor Butler, Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator 10191c5 Orono Council Members From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Adm� istrator CITY OF ORONO Date: May 30, 1985 Subject: #914 Richard C. Kauffmann, 2696 Ethel. Avenue - Variance Zoning District - LR-lC - 1/2 Acre or 21,780 s.f. minimum lot area Total Area of Lot = 29,343 s.f. Lot Width at Lakeshore = 98'.35 Lot Width at Proposed Building Site = 108' Application - Variance to average lakeshore setback line of approximately 17' for proposed new residence. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Ex!.ibit C - ..at Map Exhibit D - Lot Line Rearrangement Exhibit E - Pulver Letter Exhibit F - Kearns Letter Exhibit G - Survey/Site Plan The applicant seeks a variance to the average lakeshore setback line for construction of new residence. The lot has ar, existing residence that is currently occupied by lat:ves of the applicant. The application shows the current owner to rc 'chmitz. Planning Commission approved a lot line rearrangement for L vious owner, Jack Hamlett, in 1984. The applicant has a. ".hat the present structure remain in use during construction. he y has allowed in the past the use of an existing structure by the r, dent/owner during a reconstruction period. Pending final resolution of the placement of the new house, the City will ask that the applicant obtain from the current owner and occupant of existing residence a written statement confirming his understanding of the City's request that the house be removed prior to final inspection for new residence. The proposed house extends approximately 17 feet beyond the average setback line. The applicant contends the unique roof design and varied elevations of the roof will no' cr—te viewing problems for adjacent home owners. The elevations of the wii w heights of the adjacent homes have been designated on the survey but .got the various roof elevations of the proposed structure. In the original application reviewed by the Planning Commission, the applicant had asked for a 32 foot ext.c-nsic,n beyond the original lakesna e setback line. The adjacent and most affected homeowners objected to the proposed setback line. A compromise was reached by both the applicant ane homeowners and they agreed that a 17 foot setback, qiven the unique roof design and elevations, would create no viewing problem. zoning File #914 Richard C. Kauf.fmann May 30, 1985 Page 2 of 2 Hardcover has been decreased because of the shortened access drive. Planning Commission advised the applicant that the current dock encroached the dock use area of the owner to the east and advised that it be relocated at an appropriate time but no later t`,n 1986 use season. The property is torrens and, therefore, the enclosed staff resolution that incorporates the necessary findings and conditions for use of this property, cannot be filed against the chain of title. In this case if the City is to proceed with the formal approval of this variance both the applicant and Tom Schmitz and spouse must sign off on the resolution. CITY OF ORONO VARIANCE APPt..ICATION iLAW Initial Alplicatic;i Pee $150.00 ($50.00 per etch additional project.) After -the -Fact FAes PrLOPERTY LOCATION to Address 2696 Ethel Ave. Property Ident i f i cz -ion Number (P. I . D.) 20-1 17-23-24-0044 Please check one -- Is the property abstract or X torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not incli!ded c-n : eyuir, d survey. APPLICANT Name Richard r. Kauf fmann Phone 537-2968 Fail ig Address 3836 Hampshire Ave, Crystal, MN 55427 OWW ER Name 'o _-!;chn,itz _ Phone 47;-98., Mailing Address _.r a Ethel Ave. -- Date Property Ar• -� :a _ 12/84 _ (month/, I (xk, also own the id jacent parce _ s of land. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Fwt4SENT USE OF PROPERTY Pre st nt Z; n i ny Dist . i ^t. i-k-1C P-esent U:.,• Prepm. iy `.;fngle Fac.:i ly__ - — Other > -- --- — _ ----- ---------- - - - - -- - DESCRIPTION G, EQUFST : stimat eJ Construction Cost $ 140 - 160,00n.00 The lot in this reruc,t is located in Che extreme north- 0'e%Cr t bf, rf., 1 n d e t a i 1 : wer [_for! ions_of_Cu tar. ^.cy and vet year the end of the h e te•�ergraphy of the lot wi c i shuw g ades of 271 creatingdif f i. ul t lot maintenance at d ac+il F-ror.ioc oble Also present arc poor lake snore access and a�,c•abi it Con- •trurtIng A flaw-�!R!� • � 7t rvFc ZT e a jh..er� F5 tenance &Lt l,Pkr S' r,, .rce• Ittyy� the adiacent re�iuc;itial elevation and locations lulus t`�e proposed conatIWi " - ",or ", ti, i'fi f"f-ou bn`dlucatloh p"r-cverTf-ai,v-GTc%k:tjcT ui`TAiC� v1#v6T_oY X(IT TPf1C' properf V"•Aik n:w',to1R1.D IA)t. Ares Lot width Hard( -over 'yrtt'ack Vat lances ( front - �id�' Re-, i Ot t'%f t A'. + i wr take Sh— a aetb:+. M WV i • HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting frog, strict enf(,rcement of zoning regulations: If construction of the new residence were to comply with the re;ulation it would result in cult accessibility to lake s ore due to 'it Feand gra es and distance ra-t e lake shore from that location. oni— aT—problems word -be prov ng proper lawn care and maintenance an any possible soil eru s on due to ----the--919€L stMU-------------------- -------------------- ---------------- DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPE1JTf CONDITIONS Describe unusual proper, y con'44-ions preventing compliance with 'honing Code Requirem.-nts: 272 grade slopes exist on this lot starting at a point 50' from the lake Ghory Constructing, the new residence in the re0ueste area greatT reduces tFiese grades. - REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Cert.Li ied Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 %,vernment Center 348-3271 ) 3. Stamped, le 11 sized envelope ( 410 ) prc--addr e,.sr•.t to eacn of t-he names on th^ above list with no return a 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations -is required. 5. Plat Asap. The Applicant a erty Owner must e' jn th` .,1)plication. Please re,nember that your variar.- lication is not ccmpiete f the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: The applicant hereby agrees to provide all inf.ormatio.,, required or reque-t ':y the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay al l fees and/or u.—osual expenses incL. red in review of this appl iration, and certifies that the infor; ation supplied is true and correct t.c the best is/her knov'-6ge. Al nt' s <' i nnat urc Date A-ril 24, 1985 OWNERS S I GNA'1 URF: ; The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this aE.,plication and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the propert-y by City staff, consultant agent_, commission .nembers, and Council me-,b(rs for purposes of i,vest igatic,.. and verification of this request. Owner's signature D,- Apri1 2y, 1985 Applicant must have al l subm.ttaI ; into thr City , ff irvs 25 days before- the VIJ11111n(jI0n;It1'i`!,ivrk(!(•(-t.]n(j. PIinnIi,(jCori,*,1S';ronMcctin(jt-atd(11,t11e_'t111rd Monde,, of t,ach RUN DATE 04/16/85 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PRCPERTY OWNERS LISF REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 7 BATCH 004 (f 38 20-117-23 24 0003 PROP ADDR 02684 CASCO POIIIT RD CANER NAME THEODORE C DAIITIS TAXPAYER DAVID RLRIKLE N•.IE/ADDR 2684 CASCO PT RD SO WAYZATA MH 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0008 PROP ADORI 02715 CAPOLI14E AVE OWNER NAME GINKEL CCNST CO TAXPAYER DEKNIS C MILLER NAME/ADDR 2735 CAROLINE AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 r' 38 20-117-23 24 0015 PROP AOOP.� 02725 ETHEL AVE OWNER NAME J A E ROSLRTSON TAXPAYER JAMES A ELIZAEETH ROPERTSON NAttE/ADDR 2725 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 S8 20-117-23 24 0040 PROP ADDR 02720 ETHEL AVE OWNER NAME JOHN WAYNE A JOYCE E HAM!)LET TAXPAYER JOH. W A JOYCE HAMTLET NAME/ADDR 27a-O ETHEL AV OROVO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0046 PROP ADDR 02691 ETHEL AVE 01+ N NAME DOROTHY L KEARNS TAXPAYER DOROTHY L KEARN5 NAMIE/ADDR 2691 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA MN SS391 38 20-117-23 24 0004 02686 CASCO V:):'?1T R' THEODORE C OANTIS DAVID RUNKLE Zo04 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA 141 55'11 38 20-117-2' ^4 0013 02700 ETHEL AVE CURTIS R JEN7EN A WIFE CURTIS R JEhS0l 2700 ETHEL A ORONO MN 5' L 38 20-117-23 24 0025 02691 CAROLINE AVE HARRY E PULVER A WIF£ HARRY E PULVER 2691 CAROLINE AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0044 02696 ETHEL AVE R A J KAUFFMANN THOMAS A CAPPIE A SCHMITZ 2696 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 TOTAL EATCH 00013 38 20-117-23 24 0007 02715 CAROLINE AVE JAMES C ROSEt1CRANTZ ET AL JAMES C ROSENCRANTZ 2715 CAROLINE AVE Oro.'l0 MN 55391 i 38 20-117-23 24 0014 02705 ETHEL AVE LtWPENCE D PILLAR LANIZENCE D PILLAR 2705 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA Mil 55391 38 20-117-23 24 C033 02690 CAROLINE AVE R M FEAVENY ETAL RICHARD M KEAVENY 80X 59 NAVARRE rN 55392 38 20-117-23 24 0045 02697 ETHEL AVE C GGRDOtl AMtMOSON ET AL C GCPDON AML140SCH 2697 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 1 RUN DATE 04/16/85 BATCH 004 ,r oft HENNEPIII COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 06DIEPS LIST REPORT HO . PI435401 PAGE 8 . fPTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED —4 AN ACCURATE AND TRUE ,,PRESENTATICFI OF INFONMAIACN AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENHEPIos COUNTY OEPAATMFNT OF PFCPERTY TAXATION, J0 THE BEST OF MY K143WLEOCE AND BELIEF. DATE G by i 00 gk`ik Of.)T OF WINSHIP'S SUSOIVIS7 4 w cr "A C OF LOT 1. SPRItir, PARK ?NC cl 14 E 0 -TER KIAS CASCO 4'8"3 POINT AD I �v 40 40!,.Is L95 1 7 7 / c,.%;; T 0 F W I N S -4 1 P'S S U 8 C 3 1,'. 40 1 coo 2 - S n CC Lj7 1, 5"'N5 P-IRW 24C o .4 0— 3. 40 4 25 .5 .. V/ to 21IV 40 40 17 400 v r) Is@ 40 320 0 to b� .0 49 J'a b Ail 0 A, S" CASCO c ji 0 0 231, 2 Nl- it 51 this Is a true and on of a Survey of i JCi / F, arna Tract C, �� \ r*cf lying, south- _ vn froc a point on the - ' raid true:, distant 15 feet 4orthwesterly from .craer of said tract, throuCh the Fortheasterl com er :arec Land Survey No. 115, files of reF:strar of Titles, County of Hennepin; -ds-rn; 11int part of Tract A lyinC Northwesterly of a line descrii.ed a!i follows: Befifu.1nf,. at the a .act B; thence Northeasterly along a line which if extended would intersect the Po at Easterly corner c distant 15 fact Southwesterly from said moat Easterly corner of said Tract B; thence deflecting right sterly line of said 'tract A distant 5 feet Southeasterl,/ fron said Host Easterly corner. of said Tract t�d.rg, Rrr!stered Lend Survey No. 115, fileb of Registrar of Titler., County of Hennepin; znascn) That part of Tract B lytre; Northwesterly cf a lire oescritred as follows: Beginning at the a ruct 3; thence Wortheaeterty along a line which if extended would iutersect Use suet Easterly corner c dista` t 15 feet Sout+wsstprly frv,s onid rout Earterl i corner of sal' Trait B; , thence deflecting right =*-erly line of Tract A distant 5 feet. Southeasterly frov said naet Kest«rly corner of said Tract B, ar -g; and Trncts 2 and 1, Rerict•rrd land Survey tko. 11,, file, of Begimtrar of Titles, County of Henn*; darn) That part o. Tract C lying South—asterly of a lin- drswr+ fror. a point on the Southwesterly 1 t 1' feet Korthwrsterl:. fr+ -- the Cost Southerly corner of and tract, throuCh the Northeasterly cornet Y Planning Commission City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 I am in receipt of a notice published May 6, 1985 concerning the request for a variance by the owners of the property at 2696 Ethel Avenue (Kauffmann No. 914). I have reviewed the proposed plan for the improvements at this address in the Orono City office. Based upon my review it appears the proposed house does not conform to the average set back ordinance. It is constructed in such 3 way that it will destroy all privacy which previously existed on the lake side of my residence at 2691 Caroline Avenue. Also, the proposed improvement is not in conformity with the other homes along the Carmans Bay snoreline. it is my understanding that the ordinance was designed to provide each home in the area with maximum relative privacy in the lake view areas. The plans do not show a deck and I would also expect that the house would have a deck which would further reduce the privacy at my house and other homes on the shoreline. I have no objection to the construction on the premises but I do believe that it shculd be set back at least 35 feet from the present proposed •ation so as to lie in conformity with the other homes cn the lake re and not interfere with the view or privacy of these homes. I lieve this is fair to everyone. ^1 Harry Pulver Thelma Pulver 269: Caroline Avenue F., Planning Commission City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 I object to the variance requested by Richard C. Kauffmann for the property at 2696 Ethel Avenue. Based upon what I know about the size of the proposed house it appears to be too big for the lot and, more importantly, I believe it will block my view of the main lake:. Also, because of the size of the house and decks around the house I believe it will interfere with my privacy. I believe the houses have been placed as they are so that each of us can get the most enjoyment and view of the lake without obstructing each others use and enjoyment. Dorothy Kearns 2691 Ethel Avenue City of ORO o RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAI. ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1. FILE f914 WHEREAS, Richard C. Kauffmann (hereinafter "the applicant"I has an interest in the property located at 2696 Ethel Avenue within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: See Exhibit A, attached WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.2:', Subdivision 1 to permit construction of a new residence that `.1 extend 17 feet lakeward, beyond the average lakeshore setback line of existir.:,-1 residence buildings on adjacent lots. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File l914. 2. The property is located in the I.R-lC, Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 20, 1985, and recommended approval of the proposed average lakeshore setback variance for new residence based upon the following findings: A) The design of the roof and the elevations of the roof will not create view problems for adjacent residences. B) The neighbors have noted for the public record their approval of the amended setback line. C) The proposed improvement will not diminish sur- rounding property values. D) The applicant seeks no otter variances to construct new residence. Page 1 of 4 City of OR ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4. The City C uncil has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Orono staff and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this prope ty are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic• conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to pre- serve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above f indi ngs, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1, to permit the construction of a new residence that will extend 17 feet lakeward, beyond the aierage lakeshore setback line of existing residence buildings on ad- jacent lots subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant and future owner are hereby pl iced on notice that decks shall not Le permitted along the 1- ant of the proposed residence that will extend beyond tF.-. approved a✓erage lakeshore setback line. 2. Applicant or future owner must relocate current dock that encroaches eastern pros rty owner's dock us,7• area at the time the dock is insta' d next year. The City will approve no e..:.e ,ca :cans to i l l r-il dock in current use. 3. Applicant and current owner must submit a written state- ment to City upon application for a building permit stating that they agree to remove existing residence prior to final inspection for new residence. 4. Authorities granted by this variance run with the pro- perty not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by aphli:scion for a building permit within one year of e date of Council apprrval, or this variance wi l 1 expi qn that dat u (June 10, 19bf. ). Vagv 2 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5. Violation of or non -coral . iance with any of the terms and conditions of this v ance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shal automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned applicant and owners have read, under- stood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution. Adopted by U. Orono amity Council on this ] 0th day of June, 1985. ATTEST: llor�th; M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor (1) Pro- ty Owner Property Owner Page 2 of 4 s City of OR ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. STATE: OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY CIF HENNEPIN ) On this _ _ _ day of , I q 8 5 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, persona' y appeared _ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUI MY COMM 'ON EXPIRES STATE. OF MINNESOTA ) )rs COUNTY OF NE:NNYPIN ) On this day of 1985, before vre a Notary Public within and for said County, ,-Iersonally appeared knc)wn to me to re the person(.) de .cr:ibed in aid who executed the foregoing instrument, and ac::nowlc-1ged that he (they) executed the same as 1 is (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUoLIC My COMMISSION F:X� IRFS -� --- Page 4 of 4 Exhibit A CattiMo,_} 71f0 (Ps -left) T1,e ae�rth,ecter:y el o' T:r." A, ettept that part Usreef Wr4 Xvrtl.wst.erlj of a line des- eritwd as follows: lteo:irnlnf at the anat Mstorly ,mor of Tract E; thence Ncrthessterly sit � s llns which if astsrlled would Intersect the cost Easterly corner rf Tract B, to a Point Blatant 1" foe! Snu"`Wsrly from acid Most Laster14 corner of sold Tract B; thence deflecting right to a point on the Nort9easterly Itn. of said Tract s distant 5 feet Soutt,essterly fron said root Eseterly corner of said Tract B, Pne Maid line there ending., Registered land Sarvey No, 115, files of Registrar of Titles. county of tiannuptn; Cer'., No. 5271P1 t!iedott) Tract P, ea, pt that part thereof lying ik,rth-est.rly of a line descnoed so f*Aiowe: Beginning at the Most 1psterly corner of Tract L; thence Rcrthessterly slonC a line Whit!) if estonded would intersect the "at Easterly corner of Tract B, to a Point distant 15 feet SoctEvestorly mi.free said s. Sisterly corner of said Tract B; t•oer.ce eaflectirg right to a point on the Kortheasterl; line of Tract A distant 5 feet Soulheseterl/ fr- ■ sn!d Most gsot.erly ecrTar of sale Tract B, srd sold line there andinC, Registered :And Survey Nc, 115. files of Registrar or Titles, ounty of Hsrnej!r, C � ; W>" STING To: Orono Council Members From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date: May 29, 1985 Subject: #916 Gary W. Krimme! 6 Bruce W. Engelsma, 960 6 990 Partenwood Road - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Zoning District - LR-lB - Minimum lot size regri:-ed 1 acre Total Area - 2.35 Acres Application - Subdivision - plat required because property is torrens or registered Applicants seek a rearrangement of their shared lot line so that existing improvements on each lot are located within their respective homestead lot. Proposed Lot 2 has maintained the required lot width along the lakeshore at 148.58'. The dock has not been designated, but applicant was advised that existing dock on Lot 2 meets all required setbacks from extended side lot lines. The areas of both lots have not been diminished but maintained at 1 acre minimum. The only unfortunate aspect about the application is that the owners had to pay the additional costs of a plat. Planning Commission recommends approval of the proposed plat of a lot line rearrangement for G.W. Krimmel and Bruce W. Engelsma based on the following findings: 1. The lots each contain the minimum required 1 acre in area. 2. All existing structures meet the required setbacks from the newly created lot line. CITY OF ORONO SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM (� (n�(�Date Rec'd �S 1t_5@� 1J'' %J R- Fee R d uG 1 APR 2 6 1985 ---------------------------------- [-irl-T-1- of- -0U- I Name r'Afe ell tT11"Aff 1- Telephone �/ - Jsp Ifkacf fA" Oaac c1,-1,4 y7/ -77Ja Mai ling Address 1�1J �,�,��E-,��� ,pp o ,r - SS.?S� PROPERTY Name -7,4A E Telephone OWNER Mailing Address (Attach list if more than one ------ -------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPFRTY LOCATION Street Address 51s'n-17 p Property Identification No. (P.I.D. !W 0006 /00C) Complete Legal Description to be attached to applicationcvri, f10'^k i ------------------------------------------------------------------- EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels 2 Development Size 1.51S a Acres Dry Land _ Acres Wet Land ! Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check) X Residential; no. of units. Other (specify) Preser.- Zoning District -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: _ Existing Units �7 New Units �.� Total Units Proposed Gross Density Units per Acres Minimum Lot Size: ,O 4rf'f Square Feet Dry Buildable T.a n H Proposed Use: (check) Residential other ( specify) .__ -----.------ _.- (OVFk) MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETF PRL•'LIMINARY APPLICATION 1. npplicatic)n Completed 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 4. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature DatE- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------- FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) $150.00 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivisions) $250.00 Preliminary Review $300.00 plus (Class III and all non-residential) 20.00/lot Final Plat Review (Class III) $150.00* *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zonirg Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. --------------------------------------_-_----------------------------------- Applicant's Signature " Z �-? Date �f #I'^ Da t e _ -- R— Owner's Signature Applicant must havv all t,mittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Mf�ct.ing. Planning Commission Meetings are usually held on the third Monday of vach month. RUN DATE 05/01/85 HEIINEPIN 0004TY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT NO. P1435401 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PAGE 8 BATCH 005 38 08-117-23 12 0001 PROP ADDR 00980 TOtlKAWA RD OWt1CR NAtiE GRAYDON M MC CULLEY ETAL TAXPAYER GRAYDON M MC CULLEY NAME/ADDR 125 INLAND LANE PLYMOUTH MI 55o47 38 08-117-23 12 0004 PROP ADOR OWNER NAME DAVID RIDLER ETAL TAXPAYER DAVID J RIDLEP NAMF/ADDR 2925 GARFIELD AVE S MPLS till 55408 38 06-117-23 12 0002 00970 TOtlKAWA RD DALE R AtTDERSO11 ETAL LALE R A14DERSON 970 TONKAWA RD La,lG LAKE MN 55356 38 OA-117-23 12 0005 01000 TOf4YAWA RD P J HOFFMAN ETAL PA1MOtID J HOffMAN 1000 TONKAWA PD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 08-117-23 12 0003 00960 TONK.AWA RD DAVID J PIDLER ETAL DAVID J PIDLEP 2925 GAPFIELO AVE S MPL`.; MN 55408 38 06-117-23 21 0005 00990 PARTENWOOD RO WAYCROSSE INC CPUCE W ENGELSMA 990 PARTENWOOD RD LONG LAVE MN 55356 38 08-117-23 21 0006 38 08-117-23 21 0107 38 08-117-23 21 0008 PROP ADOR 00960 PARTENWOOD RD 00930 PAPTEN'.4000 Pr) 00900 PAPTEtr1000 RD 0161'1IER NAME GARY W i JEANNE M KRIMMEL HALAND C A JO ELLE L HUPP E N ESCHDACH A B S ESCHDACH TAXPAYER GARY A JE04HE KRIMMEL MALAND A JO ELLIN HUP R EDWARD N i BAPBARA ESCHBACH NAME/ADDR 960 PARTENW000 ROAD 930 PARTENWOOD ROAD 900 PARTENWOCD PO LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO till 55356 33 08-117-23 21 0010 38 08-117-23 21 0011 38 08-117-23 21 0012 PROP ADDR 00925 PAPTEMJC00 PO 00905 TOt11 AWA RD 001ER NAME J A M WAR NORMA J JOHNSON RUSLELL T L!;t1D JP ETAL TAXPAYER JACK A MARY SAFAR NCRMA J JOHNSON RUSSELL T Lu"t) JR NAt1E/ADDR 925 PARTENWOOD ROAD 835 PARTENWOOD RD 905 T016'.A::A DO LONG LAKE MN 55356 OPO►40 MI 15356 LOt1G LAKE Mt1 55356 38 08-117-23 21 0013 38 00-117-23 21 0014 38 08-117-23 21 0015 PROP ADOR 00935 TONKAWA RD 00955 TONKAWA RD 00975 TMIXAWA RD OWNER NAME WILLIAM J MCLELLAN CTAL C CHARLES SMITH i WIrE A A M KAPAS #916 TAXPAYER WILLIAM J MCLELL414 C CHARLES SMITH ANTHONY J FAIAS ►:AME/ACOR ')35 TGNKAWA ROAD 7 SMEDLEY OR 975 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 PIEWT06N SQUARE PA 19073 CPONO MN 55356 38 08-117-23 21 0016 PROP ADOR 00985 TONKAWA RD OWNER NAME GEPALD A PARTEN A WIFE TAXPAYER GERALD A A LUCILLE G PARTEN TOTAL BATCH 005 00016 NAMF/ADDR 10�60 BERKSHIPE ROAD BLOOMINGTON MH 55437 RUN DATE 05 0 1/85 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFOPMATION SrSTEM REPORT NO. PI435401 PROPERTY OWIERS LIST PAGE 9 BATCH 005 #916 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCUPATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORCS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY K14OWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE�'I�_ BY it �/ i. V it. V • V , I .III � I � 211 211 410 scale feet N 1340 91 � �,• �, '� .� crs 6 0� P_ARTEN'WO _ 3 ; s r, p ''' - o -- `�� �� ,�• •jt �t0 �+ 1 • ,t11C. 4,' . •+ ir; ti, — :~ �'• ' M C [AST t� • •`,,,0 ` ft * o ,a, �t5 ;,` •% /r. . �t1 OUTLOT C ^' : •o jjt •• .• / y W LOT 2 1 \ EAST 3 C c � • (AST Ekti 2 Ile tL. •. r M4 ff LOT i6 �{ 4 5 •� `�� 7 LOT N ylLt: rPart of 15 00 --- / -43 992 O W J f> 'y • — r ou 7 t' 0 T a l l h 'CAi~l,k'U 0 di t.it l� �� •�.. 1♦„f �� r. � >' >•' ► � ��J� p. .'`'i6•f.;9) - ..0OO • 'till IL Al. ETIIG To: Mayor Butler, yT.' 10 10`5 Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members _ "I 3 i OF ORONO From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, 7.oning Administrator Date: May 29, 1985 Subject: 0919 T.M. Schultze, 1185 Wyndmere Road - Conditional Use Permit Zoning District - RR-1B Area - 2 Acres Pertinent Ordinances - Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 Application - After -the -Fact, Conditional Use Permit - Applicant began construction of pond last fall without necessary permits. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Drainage Plan Exhibit E - Site Plan Exhibit F - Topography Prior to Construction Exhibit G - Engineer's Report Exhibit. H - Resolution At the time of the final inspection of the new Schultze residence, staff noted the excavation for the pond. Applicant advised that it was done last fall and that no one from the City had advised him of the need for a conditional use permit. The pond of approximately 10,000 square feet in area is not located within a designated wetland. The pond will serve as a collector basin for all run-off from a small localized watershed, (approximately 7 acres in area), house to south, front yard of Schultze house and area to the immediate north (see Exhibit D). The pond will not alter the general direction of the drainage but will tend to channel the drainage and control the velocity of run-off. Review Exhibit F, the flow is to the west. Applicants tennis court and changes in elevation along the west property line will redirect the flow to the northwest property line. The pond will slow run-off to the west. As the applicant has ad- vised, the run-off has created a problem in his rear yard because of new construction on property to south and the velocity of run- off from tennis court; it became very necessary to define a retention area in the yard. Schultze advises that the area of the excavation was always damp and would he useless as yard area. The water level of the pond will be controlled by two cul- verts. The applicant has not provided information as to a spacific elevation for culverts but they must be so placed as to not create blockage of drainage on Lot 4. The pond wi 1 1 be 4 1/2 feet at its deepest point. An aerator will be installed to control growth of algae and unwanted vegetation. The pond is decorative and will not function as a wildlife pond, thus no need for DNR review. The watershed involved is localized and does not qualify for watershed review. The City Engineer has reviewed the pond and the surrounding properties and has the following comments: A. In regard to bank slopes, he advises no changes but to let them seek their natural grade. The spoils on the northwest side of the excavation must be used to trim banks along west and north sides of pond (use same slope ratios for banks as found un southern pond;. B. As soon as final grading is completed, the entire disturbed area must be seeded with appropriate ground cover. C. The City will ask for a drainage easement to reflect the drainage pattern/flow at the time banks of pond are re- stored. The drainage easement of 20 feet will assure that the applicant or a future owner will not block the culverts taking immediate drainage from Lot 4 to the south. The drainage easement will secure the natural drainage flow to the west (in this case probably northwest). Normally we would have required elevations of culverts but in light Df the localized nature of the watershed, the City need only >>e concerned that a drainageway be defined and protested via the easement. The enclosed approving resolution incorporating the applicable portions of the recommendation, the City Engineer's comments plate language, waving all liability on the matters dealing with pond's use. has been drafted Planning Commission and the usual boiler part of the City in 2 lop Pee3/ 001s 40o, oo cap a oo. oo ACA.r, , CITY OF OIIONQ -'/ 3t 106. GENERAL LAND tl`;}: APPLICATION --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION EXHIC7IT — A Site Address Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 9 / OC)pg Please check one - Is the property abstract or _ torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if net included on required survey. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name T. li-. Schultze Phone Mailing Address —skonvr --------------------------------------------------------------------------- OWNER Narr.E Phone Mailing Address I V15 J%.ndW¢rs_ Rossi, 'Jaysata, it" 55301 Gate Property Acquired _ 3l33 (month/year ) I (19.);((do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- FEF.S - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use $150.00 h) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldq $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use 1 c $200.00 f) Land Alteration (grading, filling) PRD/PID - see fee schedulc Other Applications y250.00 Vacation $250.00 Rr.zoninq "-.JO.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedu:o .so C!r►T •� �� PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: See attached letter and picktures and plans REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603Government Center 348-327,1) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Construction plans, if applicable. 6. Plat Map. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or u; -ial expenses incurred in reviewof this application, and certifies that the infor- -_ion supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowled e. Applicant's signature ' �, Date y� OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigatio,. and verification of this request. Owner's signature Uate -------------------------------------d"----------------_---------------------- Applicant must have all sul,mittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commisnion mueting. Flanning Cummisblotl Meetings are held on the third Nonday of each mon%.h. April 24, 1985 Ms .Jeanne A. Mabusth Cosy of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Ms Mabust-i: Enclosed find my check for $400 to cover the cost of the "after the fact" permit for my grading and drainage plans. Also enclosed are 3 photographs covering the bridge design and shoreline slopF. Please be advised this is to b, a decorative pondand that it is also to handle runoff from the surroundi..9 homes and adjacent tennis court. We have removed approximately 100 cubic yards from the pond area and piled this material on the east and west sides of the north end of the pond. This material will be used for finish gradinq around our home and also to refill a small portion of the pond at the northeast corner of the tennis court. The pond is approximately 41feet deep at its deepest point. I do not know how to calculate the slope of the shoreline aand have enclosed two representative pictures for that purpose. The bridge in question will look exactly like the rear deck of our home. Again I have enclosed a picture for explanat'3n. The ends of the bridge will rest on two concrete slabs which will float on top of the embankments. I have a landscape design firm working on the details of the bridye, shoreline and other related details. We als-) anticipate having to put in two small culverts at the south and west sides of the pond to assist the pond in the event of extremely heavy rain. If you have any questions my phone numbers are as follows: (N) 473-9520 % S 1 C, (u) 631-0520 Yours truly, Ted Schultze 26-118-23 42 0003/2 26-118-23 13 0002 Conley Brooks 510 Baker Building Minneapolis,MN 55402 26-118-23 42 0008 younqki & Youngsun Kim 1180 Wyndemere Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Property Owners List #0 19 26-118-23 42 0010 Back K. Hong 3999 Auburn Drive Minnetonka, MN 26-117-23 42 0007 Kern M. Hoppe 1150 Wyndemere Rd 55343 Wayzata,MN 55391 S /1/2 SEC. 26, T• //8, R. 23 �-,���'rE ��+ 142 4 ate' G Y... ,... D N D t=R H I L L o • FARMS0 CI zz A'♦ i-6.v ra-a d.y'y.� � •H£tiN.rM I �_ -+ _. - �i s �• ALSEE•S!� LONG `�► ~�• �,l ti LAKE •1. ADD. •� CJ JOHNSTON'S ` !{ARRANGEME AIF t � ALBEE' BOA ;,�. -,•. f --- " ; F f ADD. 10� 0 v °tic � w, - • ' � ---- i' yy j - � �,�� •+..• 4, ' ' EKE r 1 r• 4• N� ;rM-AIL - ONG noy�• SEC 35• 6, k n 43 AI470e110tea ex tind elevation 7 �O K I' %Tit IT\ t CT A Y r 4 :. Q ` � w r.• � 'J� 1 c.�r i � '' C �, s 0 t vie y v n0 DE Mt_ SCAIE i f ' 9"Chparki Spite is tree ?x Let of S.C.' corner house Lle•.: .�•_; 1 , • �� r• "�ni RA F/1J�t ' J ro u rn � •- LAVIJ� i. � .. ccpA1� DL►Jul,V�t,Lowy ' w � R•, AIJa -t' ' - "ULV r.Ko ,wp \ �•M•LN►IiALh r re po e - 1 �tiva�-,oRww �►� �4lD WAuK. ♦►10 Lg oo u • l e t •G c � YFf vs LA Dti4C-•F /u uD xul FfuRa�l. Ails Agrp / .� nVLAI /oi11f 4� tc �.a -► S , j 6r ;�uA oa. s ' • - �Qn� N 89015'io" E 7 _ _ • AiE urrnt r' ---- --_.. _- - i ; \ h.•tu•n9 � i Z o � _ Rl 1 ► 1 1 -i 1� V �\ \ 9 \ 2 4 •>G.as bo� dY �i .1 or ' J / I21 50@ = sq !I d. y ,, cA � 1 eons , • ` 1 \ 1 OD satbert 4\ • � � Vie\ 1 111'��11 1 ,fl•,t+� 7. OlLoaree tt1 t \ \ I � � \'�i. ,. � 310 ►o0! iq it i..lel i A —A A C.urdon. P £ ---- -- -- — ------------_— ----- --- 0 P F TAo.du £ hom P E RO W,, M Rn.. P i. Rwh.,d K /-ovn. P F � M.M. ( ou AZJr.e1. P F R„hr.r G S, Pkw—h•, P F 1335 V. 'I. —A .Y.g6...7 36 e,.q,o •d A 1 —twq. P t Mm.,n L Snn.l.. P £ //f� Rn Aa•d t L,w.,, P! V.. W C #-je,dr. P F S! /•.�/. /N...re! 551 f3 le—, f f)huw. P F /.r.. A Ao.,dun. P F led nL.... 611-636-4600 lA id P PF .e A / wb_ F A1uh.N T Raw~— P E Rutwo P %dfelk. P £ Dk ,d 0 1. wrAou. P F May 29, 1985 fA.,le, A &i A,ow I N Pa-15k kR.- 2//awn .AI /ll,on City of Orono �LS���_�P.O. Box 66rCr stal Ba Mn. 55323 f lY Y� rM�ll 3 U� i�Attn: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth V! Re: T. M. SchultzeY OF ORONO File No. 139 - 919 Dear Jeanne: We have reviewed the ponding area constructed on Lot 3 of the Wyndemere Subdivision. The ponding area has been constructed in a drainage way and will control the rate of runoff from approximately 7 acres. The ponding area will not have a significant effect on the water quality in the watershed. The inlet and outlet culvert elevations from the pond should be set so blockage of water on Lot 4 does not occur. The banks of the pond and disturbed yard area should be seeded as soon as possible. We would recommend that a 20' wide drainage easement be provided diagonally across the lot because of the tennis court being so close to the lot line. The grading for the tennis court and the excess excavation along the lot line would preclude maintaining the drainage along the lot line as proposed. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:mb / 8145c City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 FILE NO. 919 WHEREAS, Theodore M. Schultze (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 1185 Wyndmere Road within the City of Orono (hereafter "City") and legally described as Lot 3, Block 1, Wyndmere (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a Conditional Use Permit to permit the installation of a decorative pond per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counr7i 1 of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File No. 919. 2. The property is heated in thc, RR-lR Rural Residential Zoning District. 3. On May 20, 1985, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the application as proposed and recommended approval, based on the following findings: a) The pond excavation is not located within a designated wetlands. b) The pond will not change the general direction of the flow of the localized watershed. 3. The pond will decrease the velocity of the run-off to the west created by the improvements within the Wyndmere plat. 4. The City Council has considered this application in- cluding the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 1 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5. The City Counci 1 f inds that granting a Conditiona 1 Use Permit to allow the installation of a decorative pond on the property will not be detrimental to the health, -zafety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neigh- boring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding pro- perty values and the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCULSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to permit the installation of a decorative pond, subject to the following conditions: 1. The entire disturbed area must be restored with suitable ground cover upon completion of land alteration. Spoils stored on edge of pond to be used in restoration. 2. The applicant is to grant a drainage easement to the City to protect the redirected natural drainageway that intersects the property. 3. The applicant is advised of the homeowner's liability in case of serious accident or death at this pond. Posting the pond against treaspassers does not release the owner of the safety responsibility incurred. 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the items and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of. the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be r.+,,nishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned owner has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this loth day of June, 1985. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Property Owner(s) Property Owner(s) Page 3 of 4 City of 01-LONIO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this _ _ day of _ 1985 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE: OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this _ day of , 1985, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 4 of 4 • TO: City Council FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE: June 6, 1985 SUBJECT: #920 Lou Fegers, 3590 North Shore Drive - Variance Zoning District - LR-lC Application - Hardcover, setback variances to replace structurally unsafe attached garage with living area. List of Exhibits IKETING Exhibit A - Application Il�t{ 10 j��5 Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Hardcover Calculations and Staff Revision of Hardcover Hardcover Calculations Exhibit E - Letter of Request Exhibit F - Survey p.l - showing proposed addition and deck Exhibit G - Survey p.2 - showing proposed extent of foundation excluding decks Exhibit H - Survey p.3 - showing hardcover applicant would be willing to remove Exhibit I - Planning Commission Minutes 5-20-85 Mr. Fegers has an attached garage that is rapidly becoming detached. He proposes to remove the garage, the dirt under it, and the existinq failing foundation walls, and replace with actual living space. Ir. the process, he proposes to "square off " the left rear corner of the house, and will no longer have a garage on the property. In fact, he would require extensive variances if he ever wanted to place a garage on the property in the future. He also proposes to add a screen porch or, the lake side of the house, and a deck walKway along the left side of the house (see Exhibit F). There is no question that the proposal will improve the appearance, livability, and safety of the property. However, portions of the proposed additions fall within the 0-75' setback area and will increase the hardcover slightly in the 0-75' setback zone. I also do not see a stairway leading to the ground from the deck; the applicant has not indicated whether one would be installed. Mr. Fegers and :iis builder have questioned the measurement of the lakeshore setback as shown on the survey, noting that the water is at a high level at this time. Indeed, by Code the lakeshore yard is measured from elevation 929. 4 MSI,, which in this case is located at some indeterminate point in the marsh vegetation bordering the open water. In discussii-,g this with the surveyor, he noted that it is not feasible to determine a 929.4 contour in marshlands such as this because the hummocks and mucky soi 1 material do na yield a stable, un4 form bottom. #920 Fegers Page 2 June 6, 1985 the water elevation were at 929.4 right now, it might still be very 4-.Axing to define the contour. Since the surveyor has stated that 929.4 could be as much as 15' further out than the edge of the low ground, staff feels it is acceptable to measure from 15' past the low ground in this specific case. Note that the wetlands maps show this as marsh area. (I have based my hardcover calculations on the setback measured 15' past the low ground.) Please review Exhibit D. Applicant has stated he is willing to remove certain items of hardcover to !yelp compensate for the proposed additional hardcover. In the 0-75' zone, hardcover will increase from 125 s.f. (3.2%) to 194 s.f. (5.0%). In the 75-250' zone, hardcover wi 11 increase f rom 1, 319 s . f . ( 5 3.8 %) to 1, 391 s . f . (56.8 %) . Note also that this application requires a variance to the code sections which prohibit structures in the 0-75' setback zone, and also to the average setback with the neighboring structures. The neighboring property owners have been notified of the public hearing, but have not commented on the project. Note that the structure co the west does not appear habitable, and that the proposal will not affect views of the lake from either structure. In summary, the following variances are requested: A. Hardcover 0-75' - increase from 3.2% to 5.0% 75-250' - increase from 53.8% to 56.8% B. Lakeshore Setback - proposed 631; 12' variance C. Average Setback - approximately 8' variance One of the options you have is allowing the squaring off of the house without the screen porch or deck. I think this is completely justifiable. The proposed tradeoffu in hardcover decrease the impact of the added deck hardcover. I also feel that this is not a realistic site to consider the "deck ground treatment for non -hardcover", since the decks for the most part will be 3' or more above ground. Note that the proposed deck along the west wall is 3' wide, leaving about a 4' setback for the deck. The non -encroachment section of the code allows an uncovered deck at ground f loor level to extend to within 1' of a side lot line. The section does not discuss whether railings are an encroachment? -ailings will certainly be required in this case. Planning Com• on reviewed this application at their May 20, 1985, meeting and nmended approval finding that. the garage is dangerous as -is and tne. removal of the shed will reduce the impact of the additional deck hardcover. Planning Commission suggested the following conditions be placed in the resolution: 1. Hardcover is limited in the 0-75' setback ;,one to `_>.0% and in the 75-250' setback zone to 56.8%, with lakeshore setback as 63' or a variance of 12'. 2. Applicant mutt runc;vtu shed and walkway to make t radeof f s in hardcover. #920 F'egers Page 3 June 6, 1985 3. Railing required on deck. 4. Applicant is placed on notice that any future variances for hardcover may not be approved and that future owner is placed on notice that the property is without a garage and such variance application for a garage may not be approved. A draft resolution is attached reflecting the Planning Commission's recommendation should you wish to approve this request. CITY OF O ONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION initial Application Fee $150.00 !.$50.00 After -the -Fact Fees ----------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Addre ;s ,11�< 110 it f 7 / ,Z `� ;� v ?r each add � ,1 , x Property Identification Number ! P. I . D. ) ,2 3 3y Please check one -- Is the pror abstract or tcrrens? Please attach legal description .._application if not included on required survey. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPI.I CANT Name ?Z�ti � -rt Mailing Address Z�]�%�% �c,%'C \�1 i, - <7 <-3�i/ ---------------------------- OWNER Name `. r_ -. tiQ �. Phone Mailing Address Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) do not] ---also own the adjacent parcels of land. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District � 4�'— Present Use of Property •� r.,� . ,_ - f <Resident i a l Other (specify) ---------- --------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost S Describe request in 'etail: a -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width ,-�Hardcover Setback Variances ( Front Side Rear) 'Other-- v ---------------------------- --.- ----------------------------------------------- ( vvv 11 HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: < 1-40-TIC -------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS ,1. Completed Application Form. �2. Certified ,.roperty Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list \ from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603Government Center 346-3271) 5 . Stamped, legal sized envelopes ( N 10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the \ above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. �5. Plat Map. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to payallfeesand/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application,, nd certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of i /her know dge. Applicant's signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. / Owner's signature t1l �'�' `'14- Date 1 — -- ------------------ ---------------------------------------------------- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Motet ing. Planning Commission Meetings are held can the third Monday of each month. RUN DATE 04/19/85 BATCH 008 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 23 38 08-117-23 34 0001 38 08-117-23 34 0002 38 08-117-23 34 0011 PROP ADDR 03605 HCRTH SHORE OR / OWNER NAME HENNEPIH COUNTY HENNEPIN COUNTY LAUZEIICE A JOKES & WIFE TAXPAYER HENN COUNTY HENN COUNTY LAI'?ENCE d APDELL JOKES NAME/ApDR 36G5 tlORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA t1N 55391 38 08-117-23 34 0019 / 38 08-117-23 34 0020 / 38- 08-117-23 34 0022 PROP ADDR 03570 NORTH SHORE OR 0358O IIORTH SHORE OR 90 NORTH SHORE DR OMIER IIAME DONALD JEROME LAMONT PERCY C GOOEL ETAL M FEGERS TAXPAYER DONALD J LAMONT WALTER PEIIIIERTO14 ILYN E FEGERSNAME/ADDR 3570 NORTH SHORE DR 4567 GAYWOOO DRIVE 0 NORTH SHORE DRIVEORONO CL MN 55391 MINI.ETONKA ION 55343 ZATA H14 55391 38 08-117-23 34 0023 38 08-117-23 34 0025 38 08-117-23 34 0034 / PROP ADDR 03598 NORTH SHORE DR OWNER NAME L G LA BRESII ETAL E0VARD H SPINDLER / STATE LAUD DEPT TAXPAYER LESLIE G LA BRESH ESTATE OF ED14ARD SPIttDLER CITY OF CRONO NAME/ADDR 4575 WAYZATA BLVD C/O LARKINs HOFF11AN, DALY :I WALTER R BEWSON/CITY ADM MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 7900 XERX,ES AVE S SUITE 1500 OP.OWO MN 55391 BLOOMINGTON MN 55431 38 08-117-23 34 0055 38 00-117-23 34 0056 � 38 08-117-23 34 0059 PROP AOOR 03550 NORTH SHORE DR / 03587 NORTH SHORE OR 01420 BALDUR PARK RD 01TIER NAME DENNIS 0 GONYEA ET AL RONALD L CHRISTENSEN Ii WIFE G & H ROTH TAXPAYER OENf1I5 0 GONYEA R014ALD t MAYDETH CHRISTENSEN GUENTHER R ROTH NAME/ADDR 50 GROVELANO TERR 3587 NORTH SHORE OR 4603 ELLERDALE RD MPLS MN 55403 WAYZATA HN 55391 MINNETONKA MN 55343 PROP ADOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH 008 00012 NAME/ADDR #�2 0 RUN DATE 04/19/85 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT NO. PI435401 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PAGE 24 BATCH 008 2 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE"CORD 5 OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPER Y TAXATION, TO BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF p o titi IPAI ♦ 2 /Z 4, ♦� ,r1 �`� t / �� ti • «�` � �. OG �w ♦ a , `,P I 17 IL6� �� 1 \6f� 4� All ,7 12 i to I ,ioo i�49i ti Y �, ��i !� \ �• 1 30; 31 i 32 Q S v, a 63 ! 2 / I..Q a•�i •4 ` `• r tti •AK • ,6h / ---- '^ --- --- —. _ s= ', / i •�•�iD Nc zee i .-)A C .. Porf of lot 2.81oekl, ^--- --+-- - -- 36_�Noazr�,� Crystol Bay View 7 90.9d ,yes LAKESHORE SETBACK ZONE 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000, Directions: ORONO HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET A Existing B. Existing lot area hardcover in zone in zone sf J�� sf Z O sf sf sf sf sf sf C. Existing D hardcover percentage ( (B-!A) x 1001 / , f e> Proposed hardcover in zone 7i E. Proposed hardcover percentage [ (D?A) x 1001 F. Allowed hardcover percentage ~ sf 0 J , / / C 'sf y 1% 2 5 Y. ' sf 90 30 sf o/ 0 3 5 A. Existing Lot Area in Zone - includes the total square footage of dry buildable land within the specified zone. B. Existing Hardcover in Zone - includes the square footage of existing roofs, decks, sidewalks, driveways (oravel or paved) and other rain -impervious surfaces within the specified zone. C. Existing Hardcover Percentage - divide the number in B by the number in A and multiply by 100. D. Proposed Hardcover in Zone - includes the existing hardcover plus all proposed additional hardcover. E. Proposed Hardcover Percentages - divide the number in D by the number in A and multiply by 100. F. Allowed Hardcover Percentages - if the percentages in column E for any setback zone exceed the allowed percentages in column F, you should contact the Zoning Department at 473-7357 to discuss the possibilities of obtaining a variance. Generally, if a�cot__r_eval of existinq hardcover matchss__the_additional hardcover proposed, resulting in no_net increase of ar cover in a_speciried zone, a variance may not be necessary. ORONO HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET 1'�y S'7`A'F F LAKESHORE A. Existing B. Existinq C. Existing hardcover hardcover D. Proposed E. Proposed F. Allowed SETBACK lot area hardcover hardcover hardcover ZONE in zone in zone percentage in zone percentage percentage ( W-W x 1001 [ (D;A) x 1001 0 `Yo 0-75' 3 /q Ciosf sf / sf ✓ �� "�n 75-250' 2. 5-0sf a I sf �.� S �L�� % sf �'-�, , �, /0 25 250-500' sf sf sf 30 500-1000' sf sf "�a sf % 35 Directions: A. Existing Lot Area in Zone - includes the total square footage of dry buildable land within the specified zone. B. Existing Hardcover in Zone - includes the square footage of existing roofs, decks, sidewalks, driveways (gravel or paved) and other rain -impervious surfaces within the specified zone. C. Existing Hardcover Percentage - divide the number in B by the number in A and multiply by 100. D. Proposed Hardcover in Zone - includes the existing hardcover plus all proposed additional hardcover. E. Proposed Hardcover Percentages - divide the number in D by the number in A and multiply by 100. F. Allowed Hardcover Percentages - if the percentages in column E for any setback zone exceed the allowed percentages in column F, you should contact the Zoning Department at 473-7357 to discuss the possibilities of obtaining a variance. Generally, if a concurrent removal of existing hardcover matches the additional hardcover proposed, resulting in no net increase of hardcover in a specified zone, a variance may not be necessary. Az' A. 0-7S' = 3p00 s 4. Gov s� Weon I-JA-L-KWALy LO GK wA-L L NOT- I N c-Zcs e �X/S'r'N� ffi�►� � co✓r,e 7S' 2�' (� P-•-cN ur v-4c.,G w o �s P3 L v c Ic w "L �. l qL{ (:-o /) %DLOSp- A�� ; usF ao� zS. Kx P -- �..,•� SAP ) 3 S .i . G�-��. s��► /3 s • � . t Dlxc�A�.pC fo� 'D#2!V P vnjrti-t 3S? ►319 s �. � �9 i s �. Ne'r' /"' c44A S t 7s'"? ; '7 s 3, 0 a - a. Certificate of survey , . S 1 for Marty J. Bethke of part of Lot 8, Block 2, "BALDUR PARK" Hennepin County, Minnesota <- nQ: h . . fib" i �o vo �k / r 04r.. 0 124. movable abed N Q• I hereby certify that is a t•ue and cor- rect representation of a �.�� survey of the boundaries of that part of Lot 8, Block 2, "B 'OUR PARK" lying North of -junty Highway No. 51, and c ` the location of all build- in.•s, if any, thereon. It does nod., p jrport to show any other mpr, •,?m«-nts or encroachments. COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. Mark s. Gronberg Reg. No. 1275 Gordon R. Coffin Reg. No. 6064 Engineers and land Surveyors Long Lake, Minnesota Phone 473-4141 e;ee 75lr«l /'Om I Cdge of /o Jgrbund i 6 Lane 53 /ee1 4►+ ^ tenleilne of Ira✓CI \..� � d �I J J- X7p �0. . �J- C° Scale: t tnch 30 fc•s,t Date April 18, I9R5 0 Iron marker Certificate of Survey for Marty J. Bethke a - L�-- of part of Lot 8, Block 2, "BALDUR PARK" Hennepin County, Minnesota -IM 'b• Exisiiny �� ��q� nrcrobk shed I. \ . 4e1 ,M—F- I hereby certify that this is a true and cor-\2, Elm rect representatio 7f a survey of the boi varies that part of ,.ut 8, Block"BALDUR PARK" lying North of County Highway No. 51, of the location of all build- / ings, if any, thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. COFFIN 3 GRC N(7_ y i7q ark S. CtonherReg. Nc;. I2755 Gordon R. Coffin Reg. No. 6064 Engineers and Land 51itveyors Long lake, Minnes-:)ta Phone 471-414I N L;rte 75f�e1 iron+ • edge of /0,19roUnd I, �A `hll wll �qY L ine 13 feet !{t*rr �!� eenfertint oflrare/ `Cenfv/ine J, jPOP n� \ Scale: I inch . 30 fcet Date April 18, 1,#85 Iron ridtkcr Certlflratc of Survey 41 �. Bethke Of part o. d, Block 2, 'Wr.DUR PARK" �. Hennepin County, Minnesota �� SS x� L ot �. 9 l� naorob/e shed I hereby certify that `his is a true and cor- rect representation of a`PI survey of the boundaries ot�'�°� 36 that part of Lot 8, Block 2, "BALDUR PARK" lying North of County Highway No. 51, and / of the lucation of all / build- ings, if any, thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. COFFIN 8 GRONBERG, INC. aN��rk S. � No 9 g 2755 Gordon R. Coffin Peg. No. 6064 Engineers and Land Surveyors Long Lake, ainnesota Phone 473 4141 se Line 75�ee�Fro^' i k-ed9e of/o,dground S/ads ��� 90 i "� L one j3 Feet l3r�m � .� tenteiiL'ne al tra✓e/ J \ VV1, `Centr.;%ile •i /rnre/ i Scale: 1 inch . 30 feet Date April 18, 1985 0 Iron marker Certificate of Survrij for Marty J. Bethke of part of Lot 8, Block 2, "BALDUR PARK Hennepin County, Minnesota V20 v q� s t r • 4e „ �• � Er%aJin9 � , .Q �elre 75/ee10' A- edgC of to jgrtund I hereby certify that �! this is a true and cor- I a i` + rect representation of a \,, %,r9 survey of the boundaries o&o that part of Lot 8, Block�Q, ,� - ° spat, i1 L,ne !3%er /+an+ "BALDUR PARK" lying North `cenfertineo!Move / of County Highway No. ,5 and %`� 86a wlk v of the location of bu�,l6�\ ; y. ings, ifamf, the o ' •r does`. not purport to show a,'or improvements gr encrc, ,`7ebts. ` 5� ! � Curler%ne y• �W. . h of !rare/ J 1 COFFIN d GRONBERG, INC. CO°� Mark S. Gronberg Reg. No.'12755 Gordon R. Coffin Reg. No. 6064 Engineers and Land Surveyors Long Lake, Minnesota Phone 473-4141 Scale: 1 inch a 30 feet+,; r t �7 ,�• ,�," r Datc April A, 1985 .. 0 Iron marker ,INUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1985. PAGE 15 #920 LOU FEGERS v 3590 NORTH SHORE DRIVE a VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 10:54 - 11:15 PM Lou 5 Marilyn Fegers were present. Marty Bethke, contractor, was also present. Chairman Callahan called for the public hearing concerning Lou Feger's variance application. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the 'certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was no one present in the audience for this public hearing. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained Feger's request to replace a structurally unsafe attached garage with living area. Gaffron stated that the attached garage's foundation is cracking and in disrepair. Gaffron noted that the applicant plans to make tradeoffs in hardcover by removing the portable shed and a walkway. Gaffron noted even with the proposed tradeoffs in hardcover, in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone the hardcover would increase from 3.2% to 5.0% and in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone from 53.8% to 56.8%. Goetten asked Fegers if he proposes a garage. Lou Fegers stated that he has no plans for a garage. Kelley noted that in the chain of title it place a future owner on notice that the hardcover on this property already exceeds the maximum allowed and that future variances for a garage may not be a Kelley asked what is kept in the shed. Lou Fegers noted that gardening tools are kept in the storage shed and that it is a portable shed. Fegers noted that he has temporary planks that he puts on the ground so that he can have access to the shed when the water is high. Marty Bethke noted that they could use the special treatment under the deck so that it would not be considered hardcover. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that his hardcover calculations took into account the condition that the applicant would remove the shed and the walkway. Gaff ron stated that the applicant could move the send under the deck. McDonald noted that the hardship for the applicant in that he has water on both sides. Chairman Callahan closed the public hearing at 11:15 p.m. Kelley moved, Taylor seconded, to recommend approval of the Lou Fegers' variance application based on the following findings: jNUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD HAY 20, 1985. PAGE 16 #920 FEGERS (CONT) 1. Existing garage is in disrepair and is a hazard to the health, safety, and welfare of the community. 2. Applicant has been subjected to two 0-75' lakeshore setback zones since he is surrounded by water on both sides. 3. Tradeoffs in hardcover decreases impact of proposal on the lake. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Hardcover is limited in the 0-75' setback zone to 5.0% and in the 75-250' setback zone to 56.8%, with lakeshore setback as 63' or a variance of 12'. 2. Applicant must remove shed and walkway to make tradeoffs in hardcover. 3. Railings required on deck. 4. Applicant is placed on notice that any future variances for hardcover may not be approved and that future owner is placed on notice that the property is without a garage and such variance application for a garage may not be approved. Motion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). #921 CHUCH VAN EECKHOUT 2135 SALEM COURT VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 11:18 - 11:26 PM Chuck Van Eeckhout was present. Chairman Callahan called for the public hearing concerning Van Eeckhout's variance application. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was no one present for the audience for this application. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaff ron explained that this variance application is a result of a construction error in which the house was placed incorrectly by the applicant's footing contractor and ended up too close to the lot line. Gaffron noted that either a lot line rearrangement or a variance is needed. Chuck Van Eeckhout explained that the reason the mistake happened is because there was about 10' of snow on the ground at the time of the footing inspection. Van Eeckhout noted that it was virtually impossible to see the corner stakes at that time. Van Eeckhout noted that at the time the footing inspection was made, the footings for the garage had not been dug and that the footing inspection was only for the home. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. GRANTING A VARIANCE TO M`JNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 AND SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 and 2 FILE 1920 WHEREAS, Lou Fegers (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 3590 North Shore Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 8, Block 2, Ba ldur Park, lying North of County Highway No. 51 (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 and Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 and 2 to permit the removal of an attached garage and replace with addition and living space, screen porch and deck located within 63 feet of the lakeshore and which will encroach 8' into the -,-rage lakeshore setback and which will increase hardcover in 0-75' lakeshore setback zone from 3.2% to 5.0% and in the 75-250' zone from 53.8% to 56.8%. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RF.SOLVF.D by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS I. This application was reviewed as Zoning File No. 920. 2. This property is located within the LR-lC Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 20, 1985 and recommended approval based on the following findings: a) The existing garage is becoming separated from the house due to a poor foundation and is in a hazardous and unsightly condition. b) The proposed hardcover tradeoffs by removing a shed, wooden walkway, stoop, and planter decrease the impact of the added hardcover. Page 1 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4. The small lot size and location of existing house and driveway are hardships to the property. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planninc, Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the appli- cant, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neigh- boring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship cr difficulty; is necessary to preserve a sub- stantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Code Section 10.55, Sub- division 8, and Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 and 2 to permit removal of the attached garage and construction of additional living area, a screen porch, and deck located within 63 feet of the lakeshore and which will encroach 8' into the average lake - shore setback and which will increase the hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone from 3.2% to 5.0% and in the 75-250' zone from 53.8% to 56.8%, subject to the following conditions: 1. Hardcover is limited in the 0-75' setback zone to 5.0% and in the 75-250' setback zone to 56.8%, with lakeshore setback of 63' or a variance of 12'. 2. Applicant must remove shed and walkway to make tradeoffs in hardcover. 3. Railing required on deck. 4. Applicant is placed on notice that any future variances for hardcover may not be approved and that owner and future owner are placed on notice that the property is without a garage and such variance application for a garage may nct be approved. Page 2 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the owner, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (June 10, 1986). 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and here- by agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this loth day of June, 1985. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Property Owner Property Owner Page 3 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 1985 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 1985, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the persons) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 4 of 4 Mhoft BURIINGTON NORTHERN R.,ILROAD SALE S and PROPS R1 Y MANAGEMENT DEPARIMCNI June 3, 1985 3300 Continental Plaza 777 Main Street Ft. Worth, Texas 76102 D Nil Cam; N U-V1[ , JLjr - 6 �!JLD% CITY OF ORONO City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Gentlemen: RE: Lease 248,02 - 8 inch longitudinal sanitary sewer pipeline and crossing - Orono, MN Enclosed, in duplicate, is the above -mentioned agreement. BOTH copies should be signed in the presence of witnesses and returned Tor —signature on behalf of Burlington Northern. One copy will be returned for your record. Please send a check payable to Burlington Northern Railroad Company for the rental specified in the agreement. Sincerely, 0. P, lhouse Lease Representative Attachs. copm603.1 CUUN�jI'L (sk? TINQ iU!I 10 CITY OF WND THIS AGREEMENT, made this 1st day of June 1 19 85 , between BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY (formerly BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC.,)e Delaware corporation, hereinafter called "Railroad," and CITY OF ORONO, a municipal corporation of the State of Minnesota, whose post office address is Box 66, Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323, hereinafter called "Permittee." WITNESSETH: Railroad, for and in consideration of the fee herein provided to be paid to it by Permittee and of the covenants and promises hereinafter made to be observed anA performed by Permittee, does hereby grant to Permittee license and permission to excavate for, construct, maintain and ope .. 8—inch sanitary sewer pipeline, hereinafter referred to as the "facility," upon, along or across the right of way of Railroad, underneath the surface thereof, and under the tracks of its railroad, as the case may be, at or near Orono Station, in the County of Hennepin , State of Minnesota to be located as follows, to -wit: crossing at survey station 137 + 80 - milepost 27.43 as shown colored red Exhibit "A", dated April 25, 1985, on the plat hereto attached, marked and by this reference thereto made a part hereof. Permittee in conside ation of such license and permission hereby covenants and promises as follows: 1. Perm ay in advance to Railroad for this permit the sum of Four Hundred Dollars ($400.00) for the f_ a (5) year period and Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250.00) for each five (5) yt reafter; also all taxes nW its that may be levied or assessed against said facility. Railroad reserves the right to change the said charge at any time this permit remains in effect upon thirty (30) days' written notice. This provision for payment shall in no way restrict Railroad's right of termination under Paragraph 9 hereof, 2. Permittee, at Permittee's sole cost and expense, shall excavate for, construct, reconstruct, maintain and repair facility placing the some in accordance with the specifications provided in application dated March 25, 1985, heretofore approved by the Railroad's Reg'onal Manager Engineering. Permittee shall fill in the excav,:tion, and restore the surface of the ground to its previous condition subject to the approval of the Superinterxlcnt of the Division of R&Ilroatt upon which the facility is located Said Supxennlendeot shall have the right at any time when in his judgment . iwt.omes necessary or advisable, to require any material used in the work to be replaced with like material or with material ut a more permanent character; also to require additional work or change of location of said facility as a mat!er of safety, or of appearance, or on account of additional tracks being laid, change of grade thereof, construction of a building, or for any other reason whether or not connected with the operation, maintenance, or improvement of the railway of Railroad, all of which shall be done at the expense of Permittee in the manner herein provided. 3 Permittee shall give to the said Superintendent at least two (2) days' advance notice of any work to be done by Permittee in the excavation, construction, any reconstruction, maintenance, repair, change of location or removal of the facility, and shall conduct such work in such manner as not to interfere with the maintenance and operation of the railway of Railroad. 4. In the event that Railroad, at the request of Permittee or any agent or contractor of Permittee or for the protection of its property and operations, does any work, furnishes any material or flagging service, or incurs any expense whatsoever on account of the excavation for, construction, any reconstruction, maintenance, repair, change of location, removal of the facility or otherwise. Permittee shall reimburse Railroad for the cost thereof within twenty (20) days after bills are rendered therefor. If the excavation for construction, any reconstruction, maintenance, repair, change of location, or removal of the facility, requires any or all of the foil^ ving work: removal and replacement of track, bridging, protection of track or other railway facilities by work or flaggin gineering and/or supervision, such work is to be performed by Railroad employees and the cost borne by Permittee. 5. In the event any cathodic electrolysis or other electrical grounding system is installed in connection with the facility which, in the opinion of Railroad, in any way interferes with any train signals, telephone or telegraph lines, or otner facilities of Railroad, Permittee upon being informed by Railroad of such interference shall forthwith discontinue operation of and remove said grounding system, or take such steps as may be necessary to avoid and eliminate all such interference. Permittee further agrees to indemnify and save harmless Railroad from and against any damages, claims, losses, suits or expenses in any manner arising from or growing out of interference with the signals, telephone or telegraph lines of Railroad by the operation, use or existence of any such grounding system. 6. Permittee shall and hereby releases and discharges Railroad of and frorr, any and all liability for damage to or destruction of the said facility, and any other property of Permittee located on or near Railroad's premises; and shall and hereby assumes any and all liability for injury to or death of any and all persons whomsoever, including officers, employees and agents of the parties hereto, or loss of or damage to property to whomsoever belonging, including property owned by, leased to or in the care, custody and control of the parties hereto, in any manner arising from or during the construction, any reconstruction, use, maintenance, repair or removal of said facility, however such injury, death, loss, damage or destruction aforesaid may occur or be caused; and shall and hereby does indemnify iond save harmless Railroad of and from any and all c,jims, demands, suits, actions, damages, recoveries, judgments, costs or expenses arising or growing out of or in connection with any such injury, death, loss, damage or destruction aforesaid. Permittee further agrees to appear and defend in the name of Railroad any suits or actions at law brought against it on account of any such personal injuries, death or damage to property, and to pay and satisfy env final judgment that may be rendered against the Railroad in any such suit or . The liability assumed by Permittee herein shall not be affected or diminished by the fact, if it be a fact, that any A or action brought against Railroad may arise out of negligence of Railroad, its officers, agents, servants or emplovees, or be contributed to by such negligence 7. Permittee shall not transfer or assign this permit without the written consent of Railroad. a. Nothing herein contained shill imply or import a covenant on the part of Railroad for quiet enjoyment O. It is expressly undwstoud and agreed tnmi V zdroad may at any time cancel and terminate this }icense and permission by giving to Permittee thirty (301 days notice in writmg of its intention to cancel the some and at the expiration of such notice this license and permission shall terminate Upon receipt of such notice and before the expiration thereof. Permittee, under the supervision, and direction of the aid Superintendent, or his authorized representative. shall remove the facility from the right of way of Railroad dod vesture the right of way and premises of Railroad in a manner and to such ronditron as shaft be satisfactory to the said Superintendent of Railroad If Permittee shall fail to remove the facility and restnte the said right of way to such condition within saxf thirty (30) day period, Railroad at its option may remove the same"restore the said right of way to its conditio". And Permitter shall pav the coct and rxtxrnw thereof to RA.,?"A ' 1f) Upon any failure of Permittee punctually and strictly to obserM4 rnd perform the covenants and promises made herein by Permittee to be kept and performed, Railroad may terminate tt �s agreement on ten (10) play;' notice to Permittee, remove the facility, and re-\mee the right of way to its previous u,ndition at the cost and exr ^« '` Per 1. Any notices given under the provisions of this agreement shall he good it deposited - , united States post office addressed to Permittee at Permittee's post office ,alnress above stated or as otherwise d,., ted by Permittee. 12. The license and permission herein granted is subject to permits, leases and licenses, if any, heretofore granted by Railroad affecting the premises upon which said facility is located. Subject to the foregoing provisions, is agreement ar.i all of the covenants and promises thereof, snail inure to the benefit of and t•r., boviing upon the parties f respective executors, administrators, successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEnEOF, Railroad and PL. -esence -& r U.,M e0029 ' 115 h e\ d this agreement the day and year first above written. .,CRLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY By Oww~ Me -*W, -- Uww B Mayor Attest _ ___--_— City Clerk , r s � 0 °- 5}ate°" O a � s 0- -C, '5° S A7 �S 5� / 1 V. 4r \ i Q tal Is. t;,, / Per Me I z•ooc\ Tc/*0000./ Q . 0 h , \00 V �— 1 O )y o� 1- V a `O O. S EXHIBIT 'A' BURLINGTON V)RTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY CONTAMMG �� SO. FT. WOOF OR IES3 Orono jycm i egjn _ CITY cOukTY STATE IW# -� 0 SCALE 1_-�i=Y— DATI: 'Z S _� DW00ft rnfV CHEF EMf3 4M Twa. 4006 M ,!UPI 10111'5 To: Orono council Members CITY Y OF NONO From: Michael P. Gaflron, Assistant Zoning Administrator Date: June 7 1985 Subject: Crystal Bay Resolutions Attached are two resolutions. Th6 first, regarding 1245 Arbor Street, is typical of the resolutions which will be drafted for similar cases in which 2 or more adjacent parcels commonly owned but in separaLe tax ownership are considered as a single building site, which will be granted one sewer unit. The other cases similar to this one are: 1240 Arbor ^tioet - P.I.D. #Is 10-117-23 31 0067/0068 1251 Briar Street - P.I.D. Vs 10-117-23 31 0040/0041 2140 Prospect Avenue - P.I.D. #Is 10-117-23 --'1013/0014 1251 South Brown Road - P.I.D. #Is 10-117-23 31 0022/0023 2080 Spates Avenue - P.I.D. #Is 10-117-23 31 0079/0080/0081/0095 Two additional small unbuildable parcels will not be served: 1) Lot 6, Ora Park - P.I.D. #10-117-23 31 0084 2) (Unplatted 1221 s.f. lot - P.I.D. #10-117-23 31 u-5 on Crystal Avenue, Two addit al lots of area greater than 2.0 acres will also have a-pnolution d, ted determining they will receive only 1 unit: 1) 1205 Arbor Street - P.I.D. #10-117-23 24 0031 2) 1225 Briar Street - P.I.D. # 10-117-23 24 0030 I have also included i draft resolution for the property at 1950 .,ioreline Drive. Please revie hu two attached resolutions and make any comments or chp— s a- you e fit. A RESOLUTION DETERMINING THAT ONE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1245 ARBOR STREE'.' KNOWN AS LOTS 12, 13, 14, AND 15, BLOCK 2, MAXWELL'S ADDITION TO CRYSTAL BAY WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Sewer Project 85-1 was initiated by the City to solve existing o -site sewage treatment problems in the Crystal Bay area, within which Lots 12, 13, 14, and 15, Block 2, Maxwell Is Addition to Crystal Bay, are located; and WHEIZEAS, the aforementioned Lots 12, 13, 14, and 15 are legally combined for tax purposes into two separate parcels, legally described as follows: PID 010-117-23 31 0072 (I.,ots 12 and 13) PID #10-117-23 31 0073 (Lots 14 and 15); and WHEREAS, said parcels are owned in common together, but not owned in common with any other abutting or nearby properties; and WHEREAS, all adjacent lots are occupied; and WHEREAS, Lots 12 13, 14, and 15 have historically and are now used as a single property; and WHEREAS, the existing house, well, and septic system and garage are all located on Lots 12 and 13; and WHEREAS, the total dry land area of the parcels is approximately 0.64 acres, as compared to the existing zoning regulations requiring 2.0 acres per buildable site; and WHEREAS, the owner of the property has been notified that one sewer service is intended to be provided to the Property, and the owner has not requested that a second sewer service be provided; and WHRRBAS, constr..ction of a single family residence on Lots 14 and 15 would be contrary tc the intent of the community Management Plan; and WHEREAS, the property owner would not be denied a substantial property right if sewer is not provided to the parcel comprised of Lots 14 and 15. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, that the property at 1245 Arbor Street, comprised of Lots 12, 13, 14, and 1.5, Block 2, Maxwell's Addition to Crystal Bay, shall be provided with one sewer service to serve the existing residence on the property. FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the one sewer unit shall be assessed to parcel PID #10-117-23 31 0072, on which the structure is located; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that PID #10-117-23 31 0073 is not considered as a buildable lot by and of itself under current zoning regulations, and shall not be served with sewer; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that if PID #10-117-23 31 0073 is granted a variance and declared buildable by this or some future council, a connection charge in the amount ec,,iivalent to one 1985-1 sewer unit assessment shall become due and payable upon granting_ of the variance; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that if PID #10-117-23 31 0073 at some future date becomes a buildable site as a result of a ch-ange in the zoning regulations a connection charge in the amount equivalent to a 1985-1 sewer unit assessment shall become due and payable upon application for a building permit. FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that this document shall be f i led in the chain of title of the affected parcels in order to serve as notice to potential future owners of the property regarding the City's position on sanitary sewer service. Failure to appear in the chain of title does not negate the findings and conclusions of this resolution. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this day of , 1985. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerks Mary C. Butler, Mayor DRAFT ONLY A RESOLUTION DETERMINING THAT 2 SANITARY SEWER SERVICES WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE PROPERTY AT 1950 SHORELINE DRIVE WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a Municipal Corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Sewer Project 85-1 was initiated by the City to solve existing on -site sewage treatment problems in the Crystal Bay area, within which 1950 Shoreline Drive is located; and WHEREAS, 1950 Shoreline Drive consists of a parcel in single separate ownership known as P.I.D. 10-117-23 42 0012, legally 6escribed as: Locs 22 and 23, Ora Park on Lake Minnetonka, and that part o: Lake Street lying between the extensions of the side lines of said lots and between the front line of said lots and the Northwesterly line of the right-of-way of County Road No. 7 (County Road 15); (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the property is zoned LR-lA, Single Family Lakeshore Residential 2-acre unsewered; and WHEREAS, the property contains a structrre currently �jsed as a duplex, and contains 2 cabins which-urrently are rented out, for a total of 4 existing dwelling uses on the pro- perty; and WHEREAS, the property contains approximately 14,000 square feet in area or approximately 0.32 acres; and WHEREAS, the 4 dwelling use of the property is con- sidered a non -conforming use, which use has continued without interruption since prior to January 1, 1975; and WHEREAS, Municipal Zoning Cude Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (1) states as follows: "I. Duplex Credit. One duplex may be located on a single lot as a conditional use upon application therefor provided that public sanitary sewer service is available, and the lot is constructed within 200 feet of the commercial or industrial district. A duplex is defined as a two-family unit residential building"; and Ilagr 1 o, 2 WHEREAS, the property is located less than 200 feet from property at 1955 Shoreline Drive which is commercially zoned as B-2, Lakeshore Business District; and WHEREAS,2 dwelling units would be the maximum allowable conforming use for the property; and WHEREAS, the intent and philosophy of the City as set forth in the Community Management. Plan is to limit the density of development in accordance with the planned land use patterns and consistent with all environmental constraints; and WHEREAS, the City's general policy has been that non- conforming uses should eventually be discontinued; and WHEREAS, granting more than 2 sews- services to the property at 1950 Shoreline Drive would tend to encourage the continued non -conforming use, in direct conflict with the City's general policies. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, that the property at 1950 Shoreline Drive shall be assessed 2 sewer units to serve the existing duplex on the property. FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that the current and potential future owners of the property are placed on notice that the granting of 2 sewer units does not in and of itself automatically grant a conditional use permit for a duplex on this property. A conditional use permit application, review, and approval are necessary in order for the conforming duplex use to be granted. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota on this day of _ , 1985. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Cle-k Mary C. Butler, Mayor Page 2 of 2 TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE: June 5, 1985 SUBJECT: Rationale for Assigning Sewer Units to City Properties Per Appendix A, "SAC Criteria' , of the Iv...JCC' S Reserve Capacity Charge Monthly Report Manual, general office structures such as the city hall, the post office, and the public works office are assigned SAC charges based on i, 400 square feet of net f loor space per SAC unit. The MWCC defines net floor space as the total square footage minus mechanical rooms, elevator shafts, stairwells, restrooms, and storage areas. We have calculated the net areas of these buildings as follows: Post Office = 900 sf = 0.375 SAC unit City Hall = 2,100 sf = 0.88 SAC unit Public Works= 1,330 sf = 0.55 SAC unit Based on the type of usage and the size of the Counci 1 Chambers, this has been equated to a church sanctuary (1) at 275 seats per SAC unit. Since the realistic capacity of the Council Chambers is 100 persons or less this would be equivalent to 0.36 SAC units. The two public works gd, -es ar ' the "lumber yard" equate best with a "warehouse" usage, at 7, , square feet per SAC unit. Th. lumber yard is about 6,600 square felt. The two public works garages total about 2,200 square feet. In a! 1, these spaces total 8,800 square feet or 1.26 SAC units. None of these three buildings is likely to have toilet facilities installed. One of the garages does have a sink. The total equivalent SAC units for the C1• y properties is then 3.425 SAC units. We have assigned a total of five sewer units, 1 each for the post off ice, city hall--iblic works office, public works garages, and the Council Chamber .. . TO: Council Members, Concur recommending approval. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION DETERMINING THE NUMBER OF SEWER UNITS AT 1960 SHORELINE DRIVE WHEREAS, the use of the property at 1960 Shoreline Drive in Orono is currently under a Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the Conditional Use Perm.:. allows for the operation of a "service station"; and WHEREAS, a service station operation requires sewer units as per the schedule provided by the Metropolita,, Waste Control Commission; and WHEREAS, the current use of the property is an automative repair shop t1l,at does not dispense great volumes of gasoline; and WHEREAS, City staff has dete,mined that under current conditions the operation does qualify for one sewer unit until such time as the operation changes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that one sewer unit will be assessed immediately and one sewer unit will be deferred until such time as the operation changes back to a "service station" in which the dispensing of gasoline is a major part of the operation. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that when the deferred assess- ment becomes due, that the assessment will be spr,,ad over the same amount of time as all other units. Adopted by the City Council, Orono Minnesota on this day of , 1985. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Gil► '� L �1F;STING TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator��' June 3, 1985 JIJr-I 10 CI t'Y OF ORONO SUBJECT: Crystal Bay Sewer Project - Method of Payment As an informational item in your packets for the Council meeting of May 28th was a memo from Tom Kuehn to myself comparing Alternate A payments with varying principal and interest. from year to year. Alternate B equal principal with varying interest totals. As outlined in that memo it is the staffs recommendation that Alternate B be utilized as the method of payment for this assessment primarily for the following reasons: 1. From an accounting standpoint Alternate A becomes extremely complex for the County, ourselves and the individual assessment payers. 2. The overall cost of the asses..:nent resulting in an interest payment of $139.00 per year average increase or approximately $2,082.00 over the life of the assessment. Should you have any further questions please feel free to contact me. Memo 485-22 page 1 of 2 TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator FROM: Tom Kuehn, finance Director DATE: May 24, 1985 SUBJECT: Alternatives Available for Collection of Special :sessments Dui ig the discussions of the Crystal Bay area sanitary sewer project an alternative collection method has been suggested as a me ns of easing the burden on those properties assessed for the improvement. The alternative suggested would be "equal payment amounts annually" over the 15 year collection period (alternative A). This method works like a mortgage type payment in that the tal payment for principal plus interest does not fluctuate - (Loe principal paid increases to offset the decrease in interest charges each year). The "equal annual amount" type of payment (a; ternat i ve A) is in contrast to the "equal principal plus cL.,:rent year interest" type of payment (alternative B), which is the normal method of collection used for special assessments. The alternative B method of collection provides for the principal to be collected in equal annual installments. To the annual principal amount is added one years' interest on the unpaid principal balance. The alternative B method of collection results in the total payment being reduced each year as the interest charges decrease. For the homeown. r assessed, Alt t i ve A has the advantage of being easy to budget for. Howe L., it does rasult in higher Interest charges over alter ative B. I have chucked with Hennepin County recjarding both methods o° special assessment collection. There are several seasons wt- should not consider using alternative A. 1. Her :pin County computer system cannot reflect the breakdown in the annual payments between principal and interest but will show Lae total payment as principal on the individual tax statement each year. 2. Hennepin County can;�ot/wi.l l not modify the computer program to accc.nodate alternative A. if they would/could the cos--: to Orono is unknown. Note! The Cty of Minnestrista is the only city in Hennepin County to have ever -ised alternati A. They ten', used it once ver-tuso of the problems it created. 3. The ternative A method wo�ild necessitate the creytion of a seperate schedule by the city enrlineor or fiscal consuita,it in order to be able to calcul,ite prepayme+t of outst.rndinq principal balances during tht.� period cavered (15 years, This special schedule shot;d n:)t Memo 485-22 page 2 of 2 result in much, if any, extra Expense for the City. 4. Because the County could not show the interest charged each yeas ' -he individual tax statements, the City we-ild need t communicate the interest charged each year :h property with an outstanding assessment balance ,is project. This would need to be done P,ery year the assessments were all paid. This cot be very constimina for the City staff. 5. If we initiate the alternative A for this project it will make it very difficult to not use it for future projects if proposed by the •ffected property owners (for example Stubbs Bay sanitary sewer. The annvil problem of notification of interest charges to the affected properties then begins to have the pctenlial if becoming very expensive in terms of staff t„ 2 and effort. EX. 1.00 ASSESSMENTS PROJECTED FOR>> CITY OF ORONO, M OVER 15 YRS, 0 11.00%, IST YR FACTOR 1.25 PROJECT» 198S STREET IMPROVEMENTS 05/22/85 4,6T6,?NATo v � Li Ai 7CRA/ATI ✓C -'ab_-_.__ ASSMTS>> 10110.00 10110.00 YEAR PRIN INTR TOTAL PRIN INTR TOTAL 1986 674.00 1390.12 2064.12 294 1,390 11684 1987 674.00 1037.96 1711.96 326 11080 1,406 1988 674.00 963.82 1637.82 362 1,044 1,406 1989 674.00 809.68 1S63.68 402 1,004 1,406 1990 674.00 B1S.54 1489.S4 446 960 1,406 1991 674.00 741.40 141S.40 1195 911 11406 1992 674.00 667.26 1341.26 550 856 1,406 1993 674.00 593.12 1267.12 610 796 1,406 1994 674.00 SIB." 1192.98 677 729 1,406 1995 674.t 444.84 1118.84 752 654 1,406 1996 674.00 370.70 1044.70 834 572 1,406 1997 674.00 296.S6 970.56 926 480 1,406 1998 674.00 222.42 B96.42 11028 378 1,406 1999 674.00 148.20 822.28 11141 :65 1,406 2000 674.00 _ 74.14 748.14_ 1, 267 139 11406 7-c741s /o,/loo0 9/yy.81 It-W& lo,tlo I11 57 1,367_ A,0077tsNNL ;r&reeCsr PA/o w,VOFR ALf 144l.p,Odl A vtrrcr ALLill"i L JNIt AesT PA,o `7R YfAB M 131 City of ORONO ppFF� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL YLIi. �•'-.iiNG NO. _ .1Uf1101�'ei A RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL9 CITY Of ORONO SEWER PROJECT 85-1 AND 85-2 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and sassed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the designs-ed sewer projects for Crystal Bay (85-11, and the Art Center of Minnesota (85-2), 11 NOW, THEREFORE., BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1986, and shall bear interest at the rate of percent per annum from the date of October 1, 1985. Ta the Eicst installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date October 1, 1985, until December 31, 1986. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from September 1, 1995; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31, of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. t. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified dup:.cate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the sale manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono this day of 1985. ATTEST: �oioEey M.-Ni(1In;—`LTiy C�i[k� Ili[y Cs,-iutltae;-rf:y�i "-""""" "UNCIL WETING JO 1 01585 TO: Mayor and City Council CITY 6F kOln/ FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato�vlb DATE: June 5, 1985 SUBJECT: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Programs For Crystal Bay Sewer Project Staff has received from Hennepin County and is presently developing Orono's program for administration of two grant programs as outlined below. It is anticipated nothing significant can be applied for on these programs until la-er this summer or into the fall, it will be at least until that time before we know the amounts to be applied for and approximately how much commitment can be made. SanitaEy Sewer Hookup Grant Program - In allocating Year X of CDBG Funds the Cr[y of Orono set aside $39,788 for this program which is used to help qualifying individuals pay off the hookups of their individual residences to the new sanitary sewer. Applications can not be be significantly acted upon until such time as there is a fairly firm dollar figure as to the cost of each of those individual hookups, which will not be possible until the system has been installed later this summer and into the fall. The City will however, have to get commitments for all this money prior to December 31, 1985 as the availability of these funds lapse at that time. This is a one time grant program and money should not be needed in the future to help pay for these hookups in Crystal Bay. (If a project in Stubbs Bay is implemente' for 1986 CDBG Funds would need to be allocated from Year XII to fund similar programs). Crystal Bay Assessment Deferal Grant Program - For CDBG Year XI (w is commences 7 1 5)—t a City oCOrono has allocated $27,894. Intent of this program is to assist in paying for the principal and interest coming due annually for qualifying individuals under the program. This program will be allowed to function on an annual basis to the extent that CDBG funding is ongoing. It is our present understanding that CDBG funding will be continuing for at least the next 2 to 3 years. Since this is an annual installment payment program there is some concern as to what happens should those funds no longer be available. There is however some provision to hedge against the termination of this program as we presently understand the prepayments of special assessemnts will be possible under the program. It is obvious that any appeals undertaken by qualified individuals will have an impact on this program. Program aspects that will be developed by staff before presentation and approval of the program includes - The administrative structure and.•r which this will operate (Orono will have to handle this as Hennepin County does not administer this program). - Determination as whether there will be any repayment clause required in either of these two programs. Once the programs have been approved by Council information will be sent out to all residents of the Crystal Bay area and together with packets being made available for application. Funds in each of these programs will be on a first come first serve basis until monies have been totally utilizied. Should you have any further questions for comments please feel free to contact me. COUNCIL MFETgrl6 JUN 10 m5 CITY OF ONgMO TO: Mayor and City Council ,/ FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator o DATE: June 3, 1985 SUBJECT: Senior Citizen Special Assessment Deferment Attached please find the resolution implementing your intent regarding senior citizens deferment as it relates to: A) Renewa: every 5 years of those that continue to qualify. B) Implementation of updated income and assets guidelines. (These have been revised downward from the 5/24/85 memo in order to properly conform with Section 8 Low Income Guidelines.) If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE PROGRAM FOR DEFERMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PERSONS 65 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono is the official governing body of the City of Orono; and WHEREAS, M.S.A. Section 435.193 through Section 435.195 authorizes the City of Orono, upon proper application, to defer the payment of special assessments against any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older on January 1 of the payment year and for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments; and WHEREAS, Section 435.194 authorized the municipality to establish an interest rate to be added to the deferred assessment which shall be payable in addition to the deferred assessment; and that Orono had adopted such a program under ordinance 2.62 (1984 recodified) and Resolution 1093 (dated November 13, 1979) and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the deferral of assessments should be granted to any person otherwise qualified who makes proper application to the City of Orono on forms prescribed by the County Assessor of Hennepin County and by the Orono City Council and for whom the City Council determines that it would be a hardship to make the payments, based upon the following criteria: Number of Maximum Persons in Household Income $11,040.00 12,600.00 14,160.00 15,750.00 16,740.00 17,730.00 18,690.00 19,680.00 Assets not including homesteaded property of $25,000, income and assets as defined in Hennepin County's Utility Connection Program. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. a NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORONO IN REGULAR MEETING ASSEMBLED, that the assessments against any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older and for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments, be deferred fog a period of time not to exceed five years subject to the aforementioned financial criteria, upon submission of an appropriate application signed by the qualified person, and which may upon expiration of initial or any subsequent renewal deferments maybe reapplied for, and subject to the applicant meeting all the necessary criteria upon reapplication be deferred for an additional period not to exceed 5 years; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the right of deferment is automatically terminated under Section 435.195 if; 1. The owner dies and the spouse is not otherwise eligible; 2. The property or any part thereof is sold, transferred or subdivided; 3. The property should lose its homestead status; or 4. If for any reason the City determines that there would be no hardship to require immediate or partial payment. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held June 19, 1985. Mary C. Butler, Mayor ATTEST: So,,tNy""'M i aiC nfZr by Cierf C ~/ COUNCIL POEETNG JUN 1019?5 TO: Mayor and City Council SON FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato CITY OF ��O DATE: :une 5, 1985 SUBJECT: Casco Point Traffic Staff is presently undertaking studies as outlined in the memo last time regarding traffic and traffic problems in this area. At the last meeting it was indicated we would set a public hearing on June 24th. It is now our recommendation that staff bring back recommendations on the 24th for your discussion and, that following that we publish for public hearing on July 8th, 1985. This process is requested as it is felt better for staff to discuss with Council alternatives prior to the public hearing. The public notice can then outline those alternatives, if any, most likely to be implemented. Based on your direction we will inform effected parties. If you have any further questions or comments please feel free to contact me. COLIKIL WEETING TO: Mayor and City Council V[1101995 FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator CITY 7 OF ORONO DATE: June 5, 1985 SUBJECT: Crime Prevention Fund In 1983 the City Council passed a resolution authorizing the establishment of a non-profit crime prevention fund for which articles of incorporation as a non-profit had been drafted. The remaining action that needed to implement the program was solication of names and appointments of individuals as the original members, a minimum of five persons, to commence the organization. Establishment of the organization as outlined is typical of such crime prevention funds in the Metropolitan Twin City area. Staff is bringing back the formation of the crime prevention fund to get Council direction on the following: A. Establishment - Whether they want to continue and have such an organization -stablished. B. Initial Directors - If so give staff names of possible canTifTates for initial established member- ship that staff would then contact to see if there is an interest by June 24th. C. Appointment - Given the interests staff would bring back recommendation on July 8th for appointment of those individuals followed by review of the articles of incorporation by the City Attorney with an estimated date initial organization meeting by August 15th. D. Scoee of Organization Service - As a final cons 11 3e ration Tor tlfe Council for the 24th in relationship to appointment of initial individuals is whether this would be an Orono based organization or based on the area that the Orono Police Department sar,!es. It is staffs recoayseneation that such a crime prevention fund and organisation would provide the City with a focus for its crime prevention efforts and provide an avenue for interested individuals to assist in this area. Possible directions for this group would include distance in the area to establish: Executive Security Neighbors Nome Watch Operation Identification Monies - Undercover usage Crime Prevention communications to the communities Child I.D. programs It is the staffs recommendation that we go forth with the crime prevention program and recommend that it done for the entire Orono service area. It is additionally recommended to the extent that there is an interest that a least one Councilmember from Orono be appointed to the board. p! J COUNIAL PHTING TO: Mayor and City Council JUN 10 1985 FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator CITY Of ORONO DATE: June 5, 1985 4'flV7tY SUBJECT: Height of Fence Within 75 Feet Lakeshore Lot In reviewing rules regarding the height of fences as they relate specifically to the current fence on the Rovegno property, the Zoning Ordinance indicates the following: SECTION 18.22. Regulations for One Family Lakeshore Residential Districts. Subdivision 1. Lakeshore Set Back Regulations. The set back from the shoreline for lakeshore lots shall be at least 75 feet and no building, fence or wall over forty-two inches but not in excess of seventy-two inches in height above original grade may be located closer to the shoreline than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots. The Zoning Ordinance can be interpreted either as: A. Prohibiting everything within 75 feet and nothing higher than 3 1/2 feet between the 75 feet and the average setback or, B. That anything up to 3 1/2 feet is permitted within the 75 feet but that nothing higher than that within 75 feet or the average setback which ever is greater. Based on review of our practice we have apparently permitted without variance (we were unable to locate any such variance back to 1975) fences up to 3 1/2 feet within the 75 feet. Given the question raised as to interpretation regarding the Ordinance coupled with our past practice in relationship to this issue, staff in requesting the clarification on that matter. Basing the interpretation on past practice would suggest that we permit up to 3 1/2 feet within the 75 feet or average setback. (Additionally Section 19.03 Subdivision 15 regarding nonencroachments hoe been understood to apply although it states it applied to yard requirements which appear to be items separate from setbacks in Orono's code.) It's been indicated that it 3 1/2 feet is the standard rith:n 75 feet, the owner of the property in question will reduce thw sire of his fence to that coupled with taking care of any public safety problems as it relates to location of that 3 112 feet. Should the interpretation be that nothing is permitted within 75 feet then the owner has indicated he will remove the fen-e however expect the City to either seek variances or hive removed any fences that have not been "Grandfathered in". I feel is a reasonable expectation. Sluuld you have any further questions or comments please feel free to contact me. cc: George kovegno COUNCIL VEETINr � )Utl 1019c5 TO: Mayor and City Council CITY OF Ck4NO FROM: Mark Bernhardsnn, City Administrator DATE: June 6, 1985 SUBJECT: Orono -Medina -Long Lake Sewer/Robb's Motel Development As you may recall the vacant land in Long Lake next to Robb's Motel is presently under development proposal. Presently the development can run their sewer and hookup �o the Long Lake manhole at pipe "C" using "Long Lake Units" under the sewer agreement and not have to approach Orono on the matter. This solution however because of the lay of the land results in having to put a lift station in, in order to connect at this point. The City of Long Lake has approached the City of Orono regarding allowing the development to hookup in pipe "B" which is under the Orono -Medina agreement in order to avoid the expense of the lift station plus the on going maintenance problems associated thereto. Given the following facts: A. That between the requested hookup site on pipe "B" and the manhole between pipe "B" and pipe "C" there is no significantly developable property in Orono which would be adversly affected. B. That configuration is such so that there would be no adverse impact in reserve capacity to Orono develop- ments further "upstream" from the connection point. (Both "B" •nd "C" are 8") C. Under the agreement there is no direct allocation of units in pipe "B" however based on the discharge out of pipe "B" at present Orono could put in a maximum of 216, in Medina a maximum of 82 for a total of 298. Based on the fact that there are approximately 358 available units in an 8 inch pipe there appears to considerable reserve capacity. (Development estimate is 15 units.) D. Long Lake in accomplishing this is willing to - take the allotment out of their units for pipes "C", "D" and "E". - put a meter coming out of the ind--strial park into our pipe - revise the agreement maintenance formula for pipe "B" under the agreement E. That Long Lake has a line running along Willow from south of Migi.way 12 to this line and may provid.- available units for selected Orono properties. It is the recommendation of staff that Council approve 1. Subject to Medina's agreement that Robb's Motel property be allowed to hook into pipe "B" as indicated to our Engineer. 2. Staff be directed to work with both Medina and Long Lake to amend the agreement to ref lect the change in units for this property, together with addressing sewer connection charges on the line (5825/Unit) in exchange for future available units in present Long Lake line. We feel this situation has no appreciable effect on the developability of any Orono properties. We do not however necessarily feel the same can be said to any hookup of the VoTech project through this system and are reviewing that at this point. Should you have any further questions or comments please feel free to contact me. TO: Mayo[ and City Co�jj�f}]l\nciI COUNCIL AIFETU FROM: Mark BernhardsoXty Administrator JIM 1 0t9cj DATE: June 5, 1985 CITY Of %9#0 SUBJECT: Big Island Veterans Camp Jf7 The City of Orono has forwarded to the State of Minnesota orders regarding securing of the vacant buildings. They have been in the process of attempting to do that and we will have inspected the property again by June 10th. Based on this visit we may request that the City Council order further securing of the building and assessed to the property owner as needed. Staff is in the process of developing the notices for hazardous building proceedings and will give notice next week to the State of Minnesota regarding the buildings for which hazardous buildings proceedings will be initiated. It is anticipated that the staff will bring back either on June 24th or July 8th the request for the Council to specifically order them to respond within 28 days or initiate action in District Court. he a side note we have had the caretaker moved from the caretaker's building, which had a number of problems, up to the Ballentine cabin which had no significant problems that could not be rectified in order for him to occupy it. Should have any further questions or comments please feel free to contact us. June 7, 1985 Mr. Chris Adams 10640 99th Place Maple Grove, MN 55369 CITY of OKONO I'wl O(fim IIUA IE•(;rYRInI NRY. Minnwaln i5:i'4')•Munidvsl (Nfi[w On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka C019i�t:1: C'_£TING IUN 1019c5 CITY OF 60M0 Re: 2695 Casco Point Road - Drainage Problem - Orono Dear Mr. Adams: Many inspections has been made at the above subject property in regard to the drainage problem. On June 6, 1985, I called and left a message for you to call me regarding any progress on the drainage problem. I never heard back from you. I am writing this letter to inform you of the following: 1. By June 12, 1985, you must pump the basement out and continue to pump until the problem is resolved. Failure to do s, will result in the issuance of citations and the commencement of hazardous building procedures. 2. By June 14, 1985, a contract with a contractor to install the drainage system must be submitted to the City of Orono for review. Failure to do so w__ ' 1 result in the issuance of citations. 3. By June 21, 1985, work must be started on the installation of the drainage system. Failure to do so will result in the issuance of citations. 4. By July 3, 1985, all work on the drainage system must be completed and inspected by the City. Failure to do so will result in the issuance of citations. Your failure to eliminate the above violations by the deadlines noted above leaves the City no alternative but to issue citations and refer the matter to the Hennepin County Courts. at ILDIM.A VAIN, 4717157 • AI'M IN IS[ It A HUN A FINAN(-t-473J338 • nRI I(MIIRGS (717)59 ASSFMISC Mr. Chris Adams Page 2 June 7, 1985 If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at my office. Sincerely, �JkMka/) 6U, Q,o Thomas J. Jacobs Building Inspector ps pc: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator City Council Tom Radio, City Attorney Ron Nolan TO: Mayor and City Council �,\ COUNGi� 1!�Emw FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato of �, V!I 1 0 %11`5 DATE: June 7, 1985 CITY `r 61, A40 SUBJECT: Termination of Employment Contract "' Attached please find documents relevant to the cancellation of the contract for W. R. Benson per his request dated June 3, 1985 effective June 10, 1985. In response to this request: A. Staff is requesting a transfer of $10,000 of the current $20,000 contingency to cover that portion of $23,265.00 not already covered in the Administration budget. B. Viewing our investments coming due and being available by July 8th together with the commitments we have to see if enough cash will be on hand to issue a check on that date. C. To the extent that cash on hand on July 8th does not permit one lump sum payment either discuss with Mr. Benson the possibility of partial payment based on cash available on July 8th followed with the balance prior to August 9, 1985 or absent that payment of one lump sum prior to August 9, 1985. Memo k85-23 TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator FROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director DATE: June 6, 1985 SUBJECT: W. R. Benson, Termination of Employment Contract Attached are copies of Walter R. Benson's June 3, 1985, letters to PERA and the City 'ouncilmembers regarding the termination of his employment contract with the City of Orono effective June 10, 1985. Also attached is a copy of Mr. Benson's employment contract with the City of Orono. Under item 4 of the employment contract Mr. Benson has the option of terminating the agreement at will upon five working days written notice, with the balance of the monthly payments to be payable in a lump sum within sixty days. Since the inception of the contract the City has paid Mr. Benson for 4.5 months or $1,485.00 of the 75 month agreement. Therefore, the City will remit to Mr. Benson the balance of 70.5 months at $330.00 per month, or $23,265.00 on or before August 9, 1985. Mr. Benson has requested payment of the balance within thirty days, if Council approves Mr. Benson's request, payment will be scheduled f::- the July 8, 1985 agenda, if there is sufficient cash on hand. Otherwise payment will be made by August 9, 1985. June 3, 1985 Mr. Phil Coleman Disability Section Public Employee Retirement Assoc. 203 Capital Square Bldg. 550 Cedar Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Dear Mr. Coleman, I have received your letter informing me thay my disability has been approved. I have enclosed for your information, my marriage license and my letter�The City of Orono officially terminating my part time agreement, as of June 10, 1985. which you requested. As you stated this completes the required action on my peAt to become eligable for total 6 permanent disability benefits. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, NTYWalter R. Benson June 3, 1985 Honorable Mayor 6 City of Orono Council Members Box 66, Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 On February 11, 1985 I executed a part time contractual employee agreement effective January 26, 1985, between myself and the City of Orono, with the option of terminating the agreement and the balance of monthly payments, payable in a lump sum within sixty (60) days. For health reasons beyond my control, I have applied for which has been approved, a total 6 permanent disability with the Public Employee Retirement Association. The Public Employee Association has notified me that Disability payments will begin upon receipt of my termination. As the agreement states a lump sum balance will be paid within sixty days, I would appriciate a final payment within the next thirty days if this is at all possible. (TThha�nki/ngg you in. advance, Walter"R Be DLS�LSaV LS� ,Ali - 5 B6 O I cc: Joan Lattin cc: Phil Coleman P.E.R.A. Disability Section ^F GRU50. P:NNESOTA. CONTRACT EMPLOYEE AGREEMENT The City of Orono. Minnescta. hereinafter referred to as Employer, and Walter R. Benson. hereinafter referred to as Contract Employee. agree to all the terms of employment as described in this contract employee agreement. . 1. Compensation Package. Fmplover agrees to provide the following compensation package: (a) Salary of 3330.00 per month, payable during the first week"of the month, or at such other times as the carries acree, or such amount as agreed upon by Employer and Contract Employee. (b) Health and life insurance with the total cost to be deducted from the Contract Employee's salary. Should the total cost exceed the amount of the monthly salary. the Contrac= Employee will reimburse the Employer for the d:ffererce by the 15th of the month. (c) Contributions co the P.:blic Employees Retirement Fund. 2. Contract Employee's Duties. Contract Employee agrees to devote his best efforts on a time available basis to act as a consultant as specifically directed by the City Administrator or Mayor. The Contract Employee agrees to observe the policies and procedures of the Employer and to conduct himself in a manner and demeanor consistent with the requirements of the position. 3. Duration of Employment. The employment relationship between the parties shall begin January 26. 1985, and shall extend for a period of seventy-five (75) months, ending April 26, 1991. 4. Employment Terminable. The Contract Employee shall have the option of terminating this agreement at will upon five (5) working days' written notice, with the balance of the monthly payment`s�tobe payable in a lump sum within sixty (60) days. DAT�u:,��5� Mary Butler, Mayor City of Orono, Minnesota Attest/ 1ty C1 Walter• R. Benson 05111F" /� CsOW111 109!HTIK TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator JIUI1 7 o 1225 FROM: Lorraine McGowan, Liquor Store Manager DATE: June 3, 1985 SUBJECT: New Temporary Part-time Employee As of June 3, 1995 I have hired Page Edmunds as a temporary part- time employee, at $4.25 per hour. He has been checked and cleared by the Orono Police Department. After 3 months I will review his progress and at that time adjust his wages accordingly. We have been very short on part-time employees for sometime. It is necessary to have capable and reliable personnel to work when emergencies, sickness and vacations come up. we are also coming into our busy season and we need more people on the floor to handle customers and help increase our sales. TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato Forwarded requesting concurrence. f CM11i t PHTIN9 TO: Mayor and City Council JIT11019cb FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato t l CITY DATE: June 6, 1985 SUBJECT: Administrator's Summary Information For 6/10/85 The following format is an attempt to summarize for Council items for which direct Council action is not specifically requested at this point. 1. Highway 12 Corridor Re ort - At present staff is trying to get back and to worts w;th John Shardlow as to defining the scope of the project together with deciding which items are appropriate for the staff to take and those that are important for the consultant to work on. Based on this we will looking for a revised estimate of cost. As part of this revision we are asking for a quote by phase, with each phase having a go/no-go decision. It is anticipated this will be brought back for Council consideration on June 24th. 2. Hennepin Coouunntty VoTech Equine Facili� - There has been rscuss ons on this matter have in -'[sated that: - Medina City Council will consider this at their meeting June 18th - At Medina's request VoTech is studying the feasibility of their main access beinq to County 6 opposite Old Crystal Bay Road. - Long fake has agreed that they will extend their water system if the VoTech desires and that they will allow VoTech within their capacity for sewer. At present the VoTech is talking in the range of 10 to 12 units for their facility, this however could have impact on the capacity of the overall system, both in Medina and Orono, and we are currently looking at the -erall system impact and also segment impacts which pass deg able property in Orono. It has been icated to VoTech that they work through Medina, and Me—na work with Orono as far as the sewer issue is concerned. It has also been indicated that we wil l out- line for the VoTech initially what considervtions will be necessary should that their main access be off 6. Information regarding this consideration wi!I be al vo of importance in the Highway 12 study. County Road 15 - The variance hearing will be conducted at 9:20 A.M. Friday, June 14, 1985 in St. Paul. Attached please find Hennepin County's outline for variance request. John Cerhardson and myself will be attending. referred Compensation - Presently I am aware of 4 different compensation plans which qualify for public employees in the State of Minnesota. Presently the City of Orono offers 3 of those. These are available to all employees including part time employees and councilmembers. The restrictions on any of these plans are a maximum of $7,500 per year or 25% of the income with that employer which ever is less. For those interested a meeting will be held at 4:00 P.M., Tuesday, July 9, 1985, with a representative from the ICMA Retirement Corporation. Additional meetings will be scheduled later for the representatives of the other two. Presently we are exploring the one other qualified plan Aetna just to see if there are advantages to also include this one for the employees of the City. 5. Sale To Minor Violation - The County Attorney's office has U—ecideed not to issue an indictment in the case based on the investigations. Per your direction we are attempting to contact the employees' a torney regarding the offer discussed May 13th. It is anticipated that an administrative hearing on the matter wi 11 be held later this week. Public Access/DNR - As you may have noticed in the paper DNR awe Been given permission to exercise their authority of eminent domain to acquire public access on Christmas Lake. Additionally DNR has been seeking permission to implement Lake Minnetonka Task Force recommendation regarding the lake access on the southern and weP am sides of the lake. Additionally of the approximate. 1,100 spots currently existing that had been identifie_ .y the Task Force, DNR feels 182 clearly meet their qualifications for secured long term boat access with their ultimate goal being 700. In particular thes, spots that have been discussed on North Shore Drive east of the Hendrickson bridge are ones which they will be seeking long term commitments. In 1982 there was an apparent Orono position that absent significant public safety considerations that those spots and others identified should be be commited for the long term. It is anticipated that we further discuss this issue on July 8th in conjunction with the North Shore issue being brought back to the Council on the parking and safety issue. �J n DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Li040 b"Jushington Av. South InHopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 935-3381 TN 935-6433 June 4, 1985 .AAI - 6 IM Mr. Mark Bernhardson CITY i"C f.,•.j, Administrator Qf •I, .. ��„ 1 City of Orono P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 VARIANCE HEARING CSAH 15 FROM CS 110 TO CSAH 19 COUNTY PROJECT 6 _4 SAP 27-615-13 Dear Mr. Bernhardson The following information is the background submitted by Hennepin County for the variance petition from standards for street width on CSAH 15. CSAH 15 is essentially a 2-lane roadway with a 22 ft. wide concrete base along most of its length. Over the years, various w•idenings, shoulders, and turn lanes have been added as development has taken place. This has resulted in a road varying in width from 24 to 56 ft. In 1983, average daily traffic (adt) ranged from 9,250 to 16,000 vehicles per day (vpd). The year 2000 adt is predicted to range from 12,000 to 18,000 vpd. These values indicate that the road operates as a high density arterial. The State Aid Urban Rules require a 4-lane, high density arterial to be 52 ft. wide when undivided and 68 ft. wide when a 14 ft. median is present. HC/DOT proposes to reconstruct CSAH 15 as a 44 ft. wide roadway and provide by-pass lanes at the major intersections where turning movements are frequent. This will provide road widths of 44, 48 or 52 ft. along different portions of CSAH 15. Approximately between Interlachen Road and Dunwoody Avenue, the number of left turn movements indicate a need for Medians and left turn pockets. Along this portion of CSAH 15, the road width will vary from 62 ft. to 66 ft. Hennepin County is requesting a variance from the Urban State Aid Street Width Standards for the following reasons: 1) The narrower road will allow better driveway grades because It would permit an easier match to existing driveways. HENNEPIN COUNTY Mark S.,rnhardson - 2 - June 4, 1985 2) A wider road would be difficult to construct due to setbacks from the road to various buildings. 3) In one area, CSAM 15 threads between a townhouse development and a public boat landing. Widening the road would either damage the townhouses or cause severe disruption of the operation of the boat landing and a subsequent loss of parking. 4) The Cities of Mound, Spring Park, and Orono have passed resolutions approving the County's proposed design and concurring in the request for a variance. If you have any questions regarding this information or about the variance hearing, please do not hesitate to call me. 9 cerely, q. Bruce M. Poc k, P E./"0 Preliminary Design Engineer lar 37 CODidC i KIEET N6 AN 101985 LIST OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL cylj'y GT ©kONQ FOR MEETING OF June 10, 1985 Fireworks Permit - Wayzata Country Club Starting Shotgun Golf Events Septic System Installers - Halstad Contracting Garbage and Refuse Collector - Raldy Sanitation Redepenning Services East Tanks Sanitation APrLl CATION FOR FIREWORKS PXI1MIT VILLAOF. OF ONONO, MINNESOTA Da to:. �.�� 19 s Application Numbers .53 Name (.JR�.4T. �2nLn Tao �� ttA ',egress_ /S/ 134p,g7:jq Ila SS131?/ Location of tIreworks Display /790uu:1.-, /'fnin"nonee 4 1 ..4�ir_— _ :nme of Persons and/or Organizations Handling Fireworks Display _1 FIRI.0 1 A0 t (?m Mpm)p t 1 Name of any Where Fireworks will be Purchaoed _ 147e: _� hone: Lc , c fseason or Purpose Type of Fireworks v// .,ate of us* Q�r'��� ! /QT 19_ IT Insurance Coverage Amo:u:t Company _ Copy of Insurance Cortifiostes to be Submitted with this Application. I an aware of all applicable State and other laws regarding possession and use of fireworks and will abide by same. I also agree to hold the Village of Orono harmloss from all liabilities that may arise directly or indirectly from the shooting of fireworks approved by the granting, of thl�Dees,LL. Fee: 410.00 gas ure Hof Applicant DR Date: , Check Cash�Y Tni Lisle JG i office Iles , , : , 1917 .� RECOMMENDED: Yea_ No_ c ..a e y roc r A' N:yV 't % Yoe IVNo , 1, . rs br Remarks:_._.._._____._ C--tificate of i!IEu! a;,ce .N• COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGES WAYZATA INSURANCE AGENCY -- — 305 E LAKE CT AST PAUL INS COS WAYZATA MN 55391 --- NaM{dNO IOWA NATIONAL INS CO WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB -- BX 151 DST PAUL INS COS WAYZATA MN 55391 ----------— � -� inrun.anrry lay w.ar,a .. a _ Y »a -•.. a .E a' I r .I.ny [OnIrKlwaar .a.mrm « ,.err,. ,..>,. .,. . re ♦.,e . ....ree...„, eoa.w+e,em ,ben os-n: L arms. aew+•m..rre re.a a„. or ._ w'-.. t,-'i•-,d-Lan:LR in nnvundnil7.rfiS_—. -y100;... — 9129/85 •16CeptD1GO 500- '----_-- GCNCRPL LIPRIIIir date 9/29/89 100 PUT(IMOeILE UFsltlly y axcES LIANILIIY CXL18139321--- ---_""— 9/29/85' ,Inception date 9/29/84 ! 2,000 2,000 I. , I i4 NV0630025183 ---9/^_9,85 - - -- waaRERa coM,—iGs: Mw "11,ceptlor. date 9/29/84 100_____ I [MPIOv[RS IIPNrII'V PaM.e.atlM: Snood .. I o, i 110!.d I 1., 0 1 III r Ie, y .. pny w-. Jr m,. __ yle .. elrr rr nr. br,l lu lr.. T.rl W4 •... .ro-i r nL �a1 .. r.:L t.0 .': •r .L,.. •. .: I.,.-: May 31• 1985 S CITY OF OPONO�_�� 133i 5 BPOWN ROAD OPONO MI N14ESOTA THOMAS -J F' AH CF'CO CITI' of JRONO LICENSE Ai'DiACM1'I0L' rh��•e . nn bS: All questions must be answered. License fee, bond, certificate of insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification or Home Sewage Treat- ment Workshop attendance must accompany this application. All appli- cations are subiect to a ten (10) day approval period. 1. Business or trade name 2. Business address/Y/�D 3. Business phone Sig/�-tld ?x- Residence phone 4. Name cf icant or company representative holding MPCA. ecrtifi- catic: appli,t 0( C.4 e, r� iuC r'L s 5. Type of certification held: XInstaller _Pumper xSite evaluatorSystem designer Is this a Provisional Certificate?�(J CERTIFICATE NO.00 .d - 6. If no Certificate is held, provide evidence of attendance at one of the On -Site Sewage Treatment workshops held immediately prior to the current construction season. 7. Have you ever held a Septic System installer license in Orono before?, e 9 Most recent year / rj y f/ S. Have you ever had a license revoked? �rwhen?- r Nhee? SUBMITTitLS REQUIRED: -- s*/ti Z1. $25.00 license application fee. P'j. r'e U'.L—Pfnoge 12. $2,000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will sot be accepted. p¢G�c —1 ✓ 3. $10-50-100,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. P' 0 —LL�4. Copy of current MPCA Certificate or evidence of attendant at On -Site Sewage Treatment workshop held immediately prior to current construction season. LICE14SES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED U14TIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED. List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license %%/D it e, the undlt.lsned h,,,b, hetet appllv.tlon 10 the City of tho.c. elnne aeu, fur )lwnte to }ntt.11 enG Npel! le pt is ayttot, ..dyer pulp out teptie tint., tub)ect t0 the )out of the Stott of nMna tau .nd the dt di...... 01 the City of OmnO. O Date J 2 _ Applicants signature Stiff rlCotnenla U un App, ovll p.ton lo, Grn,al:_ Denial:_ "t<: j __._ el ly t..a J.__ Non l•i:__ OFFICE USE CITY OF ORONO -fI' License Year P:O. Box 66 -1 Date Received '- - $ Crystal Bay, MN 55323. MAY 919M Fee Paid oe Initials 7/ - 473-7357 ((1_1- FP.CU( F /7/9i GARBAGE it UcESCOLIECTOR'S LICENSE APPLICATION The undersigned wishes to operate the indicated business in the City of Orono and herewith makes application for a license to do so. Business/Firm Address, ,?&, , Business Phone Number d179-,2353 Applicai Address Phone N Check One: Individual Partnership Corporation Number of Vehicles to be used in Orono / Description of Vehicles (attached list if more): Loaded Loaded Year Mfgr. Gross Wt. Rear Axle Wt. Size/Yards License Number General area of City served Schedule of Collection charges/ dates Nat. Approximate number of customers in Orono Location of dumping area !C-A, __________________________________________________________________________ IN ORDER FOR THIS APPLICATION TO BE COMPLETE, YOU MUST ENCLOSE THE FOLLOWING: Surety bond in the amount of $1,000. Proof of insurance in the amount of $100,000-$300,000-$50,000, and 10-day cancellation clause. Annual fee is a $30.00 flat rate fee, plus $15/truck, and a $30.00 transfer fee (if applicable). __________________________________________________________________________ I am the owner and operator of the above business and I have paid all license fees and xes requir�a by law. The above information is correct. 7 V App/ ca / ----_ Date -------------- /1____ _-_______-_ _-________-____________-_-___ FOR CITY USE ldNLY:. After review of application, staff recommends: [. 'Approval Denial Other (specify) S�ignn!ure of City 0191cial Date CITY OF ORONO License Year P-.O. Box 66 Date Received Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Fee Paid '-A, r Initials, 7/l 473-7357 GARBAGE a REFUSE COLLECTOR'S LICENSE APPLICATION The undersigned wishes to operate the indicated business in the rity of Orono and herewith makes application for a license to do so. Business/Firm �' n i�r !✓ iL i /� ✓ �" �•,� I (° )- Address ^ u 7 :, (' O F?_j) J O ✓' AF / Oc/�i/i ;!G/ (Street) (City) (State) (7.ip I Business Phone Number y J Applicant's Name ri L / /r/ fi L L' (' /- Address 7 i) / /, C. U / n G /U .4 P7 L/{./A�. •a/A� J JJ�aY (Street) (City) (State) -((Zip Code) f Phone Number �� 7 '% - �y 1 G Check One: Indi•.idual Partnership Corporation Number of Vehicles to be used in Orono Description of Vehicles (attached list if more): Loaded Loaded Year Mfgr. Gross wt. Rear Axle wt. Size/Yards License Number Ger,-gal area of City served IA1474-47-o GV41 RDy H.4CR04--RR/'/f///7 W/ // o W ,D /{ d L a v b � f /< /= /l v Schedule of Collection charges/ dates a. a U PG A4 G A/Tf.� Lipi Approximate number of customers in Orono / O O Location of dumping area �� ,7 ^ f) /i /- L 4-- (n A / _____________________________________________________________________ IN ORDER FOR THIS APPLICATION TO BE COMPLETE, YOU MUST ENCLOSE THE FOLLOWING: Surety bond in the amount of $1,000. Proof of insurance in the amount of $100,000-$300,000-$50,000, and 10-day cancellation clause. Annual fee is a $30.00 flat rate fee, plus $15/truck, and a $30.00 transfer fee (if applicable). __________________________________________________________________________ I am the owner and operator of the above business and I have paid all license fees and taxes required //by law. The above information is correct. Tpp ii cent Date r ______________________________________________________________ FO TY USE ONLY: After review of application, staff recommends: Approv Denial Other (sp ecify) g nature of C ly Official Date Of L CITY OF ORONO License Year P.O. Box 66 Date Received Crystal bay, MN 55323 Fee Paid Initials 473-7357 •.• �" 7@7 �ifGARBAGE a REFUSE COLLECTOR'S LICENSE APPLIC The undersigned wishes to operate the indicated business in th herewith makes application Ifor a licens-/e. to do so. L CITY OF ORONO Business/�g+i rm EASE I00 to �A.cr/A�/ON Address vC. /. e.. -2 eue .. _ ill.. S � AS - Business Phone Number I/r//- Applicant's Nam ese� �t`e /r .va I L Address 8100(Idoe.a (Street) (C Phone Number f/c,r/ - �G! S- LU Check One: Individual Partnership Corporation U •/ Number of Vehicles to be used in Orono 0-"C, Description of Vehicles (attached list if more): Loaded Loaded Year .Mff .� Gross wt. Rear Axle wt. Size/Yards Lice se ber 999 L-erd 1noo LegT General area of City served 14r1 Schedule of Collection charges/ dates JAP'v — 94 ! _ Approximate number of customers in Orono � 36G Location of dumping area Le rC /t ------------------------------------------------------ ________-__-__--__-__ IN ORDER FOR THIS APPLICATION TO BE COMPLETE, YOU MUST ENCLOSE THE FOLLOWING: Surety bond in the amount of $1,000. Proof of insurance in the amount of $100,000-$300,000-$50,000, and 30-day cancellation clause. Annual fee is a $30.00 flat rate fee, plus $15/truck, and a $30.00 transfer fee (if applicable). ______________________________________.___--______-___________-_____--____ I am the owner and operator of the above business and I have paid all license fees andd1taxeess required by law. The above information is correct. A PP ant Date --- -----------'-"'-"---------------'---------------------------'---- FOKJITY USE ONLY: After review of application, staff recommends: Approval De ial other (specify) Siq atur( of City r ffi0 al Date / �L ('TY 3F c _ = Y = J ��VE\flA. IJe.L Y-T-p PL=KO DIV GROSS GROSS EXF/ALLOY ADAPS L it 132C.00 22]•'0 ADAMS T 11 1320.JU 227.^0 BOTLEF MC 11 165C*2C 275.00 FPAHM T 11 1320.^O 220•nP G9 GRAbEK J 11 1320.00 220.00 i= -jr COUNT FRANC 19155.00 dr% AY p 7M 5 •A PAID UJ3C5L VA TOTAL 00305 TOTAL O �n TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS = .0^ EMOLOYERS FICA A = GPCUF HEALTd B = PHYSICIANIS HEALTH PLAN C = BLUE CRJSS/BLUE SHIELD 0 = ME7:C:L CLNTE1 PLA01 E = PPLOWIAL F = COOPO. HEALTH CAP_ G = MINNESOTA •MO H = TRAAS-AMEF:CA CCC. I = EAKKERS LIFE U = MUTUAL SERV:C-S K = MUTUAL JF 3444A L = EM PLC YEE@S BENEFIT M = AEIKA N = NICCLLLT EITEL ^. = LEAGUE OF C:TIES 2 = HEALTH CAP_ MAIKT ACCT• MIJSI" MOSF CODE FOR SOME EMPL=S 'PLY ReIoo ry t f a /pi- :1 54 y1.25 '. 65 ... _._.—.. ti .'I;-_'.t " 51 761-.49 551.44 KH. US JF 42 13451,a7 1: R NJ S1 1442+925 ,1 P 4 Ss .9i '. 7'° ;1 l:l St t4)o .Y7 ti 35.4. 1. lL C- 'H {1 515'056 •35, 45 'R'^I )J r3 53104J 91•.5 _KL:'1 (° 11 17111.t7 1152o 72 "ZL_'• J•• 51 15674, 55 11?1 oil 'fq.7 is 17 1' -4 1. )4.•4 L: - 93 111, 43 54*5 ._°"4 n77u .10 42 15?7iar 1365, 54 n:L L: n-d'n 'C YL 1;3;1.45 361,tZ ^;.i: 7J Si 25`1. 1.9 21:,+7 H C'1'.I to 10 Y0121, 15 67, No K:LJO '•e i1 17s Ci. ,4 147:, i; Y!r..t'C2UY S1 'Gv M. .15_°,12 " y ."j.9 _ 1, •21 .12.74 [: .17 75 7?a 6,4/ 225,14 4_p..5t1 J: SS 14r.1 d. 46 1 121 961 .. 1,. -L _ .57.•4 39, 22 . J..J,r. ,' 55 1' 51 72 1 :. .. TL 1 71C',Ii 422.Y4 524. )n•• _ /414140.1 ry24 4 v' i 114. C:Tr 'F .. a v L. T,.n, L r. _ . . . . . ' L�NU NAMc ?•9 G?f)SS ^•R7S5 C%:/4LL7Y a %'CEV D.42 IC969997 681,44 ��•"'iIIff L:•,0 �b3 7 1 MITH 1u 97 11306,19 97A.43 TFF="1TAi AE vS 11519,43 J6T_4 Ti_VEnS 1 95a.26 290'53-iJT T5% Tor 12 5446,30 593 13 H:ES 9P 9'346,39 219,9A UH.C_LYK -144 al 4._637, 45 _ 1132.T2 --�—� .�.'U �•� .____iY47 3 557,45 4 PAID 51 T.T 4l " ._._. .____T7'rL ._.__. F:CA i:% 'ik;;' 2+0735.15 .__. _ + '%'L 9r: RS FI7A a" A = GROUP HEiLT„ ohY..:'.:C Jr" u::LTw.fL64— 1a•, �4 _ C_ _PLU- :R)SS/9�J SH:: L) MEO:C'L CL4iER 'L.% ........__._._F i"J. H.ALTM .4c_ s, i.. h •. J MUTUAL `.Ci9IC:5 44 • .. "L-6 _ L:e,u= 'F .:T:_ 2 = ME -LIP CA*C M4:9T ACCT, r 1995 CITY OF GRIM) 4^. OSI[ _ 1 • MCI l62 ^S/llIN3 I MC/ h) 03-IM/53 __ MC/Se/ VSI ftItl> 'S/11/15 L CHECK REGiSTEN N tl N RENTALS MIT GAS 1G t-SS-SS )1 OS-3t-SS PAGE S MANUAL ..nnVi _ _S•.10 iM9•) Gl ^if:a iUiPl_:ei _^.•-t217-1it.17 /{IIII� �plE _1S.sM__ Ter_1Jt1J lL.oBi G:E1:E_SY�LLS___ _a-t2t9'Lt-S! hgyGSl A. •!,e pMYLIVG L1V=._ �E3 elYe PEP e;aS /1-U{2.515-MG rAVIV AL_'�'rr 2{.]G _ „_ - -5p5 •4_I_4 ::rl API E.. Cl, _J• 1NL3.VMCN._.__.__ I1-tJ12-SIS_9Q MANUAL__ �.Y C) 1ISE eTMIT 7:•C II-i 111-f1S•Yf V\CAL 91.'S II5.•9 El eq LL:-S t SJMS M:NE >Ur CM -- - It.4112-511. 46_ - •NVAL-----�'• 25.tM- El —ILLI/S t i%S MINE eT\MT G;lC I1.{511-SI5-GG MANUAL ZtVLtG . _.._. i fa. •: CGU+(T L:1U.a -LAC. I1-{Sry-SI S•M -A%VAL 1".•>- .... c0)•c{ t:) +ve.:M C::) 71-1a11-St S.Mt - i2•.v) - S _t%s 3. Z11,v -gyp. n Mt11 L:7u a y­A: •;n.ti c119 t 1905 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 06-IC-e5 wee I -CHECK AC. DATE_ __-APWNT _ .-NCNOCI,- ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. ANY. F_P.O. I MESSAGE 161000 06/1SIs5 11M..02 ACNO-MINNCSOTA INC OFF SUPPLIES 01-4210-039-12 _--161C06_ __Q6A03(6S___,_ _ 40.02. _._._1000•�fNNr SOfA _IN[ - .. OFF-SLPPLIES C,-4210-059-I1 161COe 06/0/fs 11.55 ACRO-PINNESCIA INC OFF 31AFF(IES _ C1-121C-069-75 _ -- - -- --- - 1G10"6 C6/05/11 S4.11 ACMO-MI.NAESOIA INC OFF SUPPLIES C1-12TO-129-31 CAICS/65 IFO.26 - _ ACAO-MINVSOTA INC --ACRO-MINNCSOTA CT-1210-121-31 --16100e 161OU6 nG/O sA 65 17.0E INC _OFF OFF _SUPPLIES SUPPLICS CT-1210-219-11 '-- I61COG D6/cs/Es 21.32 ACAD-MTRNr S(TA INC EQUIF/PTS/ACCCSS CI-1232.0i5-11 ACgO-"INMESOTA INC. 21-4210-515-IC tas.ee. _OFI_SUPFLIES _ --- -- T - 161010 CGI65/13 16.53 ATAT !Nre SYSTEM PAT PISC CCU IF CI-4312-039-11 ' �101C IC,QG/(; OS_.__..._- _. 16.S1 _. 'Tot INFO SYSTEP ANT_PISC- EQUIP CI-4312-059-14 161CIC CWA/6s 16.S3 AT1T !MFO SYSIEM "At MISC EQUIP - (1-4311-069-15 - - — --- — -' T 16191C 061CSI01 2300 AT&T :MF6 SISTEP NMI PISC ECLIP CI-4312-121-31 _ _-t et0IT_ _ _CNasAEL__,_. _ 16.53 ATI1 :NFC SYSTEM PAT EQu!, EI-4312-1I4-1! -• 16101C C61011s 16.53 AT6I INIC SISTER - PAT _PISC PISC EQUIP C1.1312-21h12 - _- - - --' toms . _vote c6/esjq--16e.^C __ .ALL STECt .RCDUCTS IT PAT Sul CI-Q2!3-d19.12 sae."O. ._. -- 1° �'. 161E1! " ICSIQS L 319.•G ASSM MC141 MUNIGIPS MEMOERSNIF FPO CI-1!.O-CZC-11 A ••(K6 161-11 .6105065 112.60 IUCSET—'--------- '• n2.Ga a _...-C6s 's =161C22 OA /f1/u 3. ea. 91- RUS3AL CANlifN.1NC It P.r sv �L-�2J721L-li_ 4- 3.n3.es ' 1u090 as/1sIe5 3000 fYR1YSREM/YIftTC,1 NEARING A►P 01-4?21-129-31 -Y NQs J� Y C _ — p!i MINE PuRck 21-611I-51 9 _ �1CAI(`Ol CITY D[ff .gRrYMCM Y" 1 71-4420 513-1 j'... �. .; 9S.N • 1•'. A_�:-M 1•I �� :r'. yb�,i.-}':�. �,2'''M: L3. J / -. ..: �- ,I�IH!�l�'}>LRi(t }_iL: �. ��•_h•i,P� ,3!`:�i �2L��Ja♦'�e]r�i'.v,:I '�, . - ...�i " .,.. _...,.��) INS CITY OF SAINT CHECK REGISTER 06-10-35 PACE 2 1 __GMCC•_6?.,Q,ATCApW AT Y[A01j_—jTC[. OCSCPIP 17cM __- ACCOUNT NO. IM6. I P.C. R MESSAGE - _-- ---_ 161112 CGICS/ts 41.00 CxtPPEx6 CORA— SLO6IGACS Phi 01-42!1.29C.61 � ...... ..cis 271.01 _.---(CPS OUP IR INC. -..- -UFF-SUFPIIS- 01-4210- 0$9-12 l tula2 C6/^.5/1! IGPI CUP OR INC OFF SUPPLEE Ct-WO-0T9-1{ —isnfe-- 161112 __Q6/C51i5_ - -------- MIA MIA COPY Olio .'•R OFF SUPPLIS C1-1210-069-15 � 66/051e5 L^v cGPr Gar'PA -Ixc INC ---eFF'swru5 n-f 2lo-uv.l1 - —__._• I 16tt42 06/CS/S5 24P.f2 COOT OUP OR INC Orr SUPPLE$ CI-WG-174-37 140tall—wo- E1 COr]-OUP--R,IAC SUPPLEI 01-4210-249-62 ' 161/f2 061CSIi3 _19.65 3.62. copy OUP PR INC _Orf OFF SUPPLIES "--" '-41-17$0-405-00 ,•—,6j14r_�sl 161141 U6/CSFss 3.42 CCPY OUR AN INC OFF su". 11 11-4210-4as-cc - 9 CsjjS UP ^9 INC OFF SUPPLIES {:1G.asi.Is ' 1611{2 U6105/01 _-.j..62 {.21 _—COPY COP 00 -R IAC OFI SUPPL E3 - 71-{NO-51Si n 161142 Yells/si 3.22 COPY OOp PR INC OFF 6UPPLES /{-{210-390-93 ' • -- —"- 16ii 1 1 1, 7e0.00 [iCB[Re 6$f CARS_"--_-E6YIP-11[ATIL - - TMf7!1-S9C-a — ---- a/C30%i! a.. 1,sso.oa • 1 _ ...... '' ..«yes n '.. r 16124t_-4e/ans 2v.aC__j�r JCO e�x]xG co---_4aMC_ARILE___, _"_- 74a4tE2-59c-ss �.Y. ...CAA - �73-474 1^ 16115$ WC1165 171.21 GENERAL REPAIR Si PAT LIAEI/L$ MS69-$2 .. 1?1.21 • ___- -_._.. _.._- .._______ 6- ...... I612t2 x6/0 /1 S .L0 f i R 1(R�SCLS W172 06/0/11 33.16 6 6 R SERVICC6 As he OFF 12-4221-541-{I Y 1i121 • I 4"1 i a R SERVICES FN4_—SAS_RRI SOF 22-4734-549-6t •�12/7 6/ 3/i152.i0 0 i _ R-3iiC[C[E RN3 GIOi IORC{--_ -72.411•S49-91 - 16t2I2 06/05/15 S0.6A G 1 R SERVICE$ xCARIRi APP 13-4221-569-92 +� 16 -uz 041/ESNs I, ?I i 6 R stly Cj}y "-Sq_ FhI EOF _ _ 73-a7!a-569-92 1692R 06105/15 4.20 i S i SERVICE$ PRY SIOG/LFCS - 73-4313-569-6. _ 1612R 06/CSISS 10.40 s e X RRYICCE HEART&& A" 14-4221-590-53 169.2s —C's C 161215 06/05/15 160.39 _u.ry GROUP RVL,U, N.1`. :. ... .,;.,GROUP RCALTM 1 01-115-1-171-31 01-4151-126- 11 01-4151-129_31 • il-N51-590-a3 'afs1A��Rx'fii�TLE1.a'ili.•'.111.Y:Jpi�i�'�1rL'.lii �:_':.au"i �; I, toes cnT OF agwo 696.51 . CHECK REGISTER Ct-10-65 PAGE - III"_ CESC2If+ICR ICCOVaT 40. IAN. R P.O. 6 MESSAGE 61217 061(105_ 61.15 NCR CIA HEALTH CARE MEAL IM tAS _ ----- ---HEALTH - Obl1S1-06v-IS - - - - - -- -�- �� 1612I1 0!/OiIIS R.IS K!0 CIA HEALTH CARE IRS CI-N 51.12Y-`1 161211 061Cf fly 110.03 NCO CIA MEALTM CAME HEALTH IRS 01-4151-1?4-I3 1612LL—RG MI. IS _1". IE ...... --FED CSN MCALTM CA11C.. OCR LT M INi _ (1-413/-249-42. 161211 C61011% 44.01 RED CYR MTALTO CARE HEALTH IRS 12-A lsbSa S-it 10211 o610115 6C.OZ Rr0 CIA HEALTH CARE HEALTH INS /3-4111-50-v1 16114/ 06I(3115 )..00 [Nil MY RVYT ASSM B[OMS /PU Ia0 tCl3 [t-{N0-039H2 161iso e61ptAL__..___,e.OR rN1L.11LST_MUN[ . CLRs._._!![MSLRSM tI_._.______[7-asec-Osp-1;_. 66.00 / ----_- ---$loll[ au 1113 T6 06/GS165-_ 10/.46 JOHNSON PAPER Co wr 7s-a1!C-S15-c0 „ 1 •). ...... ..-Cps I 111301 01/0L6S LAWN RELATIONS A65N CONSULT YI{C - 01-4501-@0-11- •y� 92a.20 a:a.zo 1 • AimC-E20-11--�-�--------� I•' 161601 COMM 1.211. SO LAR[RINA CONE 0[AT RMER 6silp L.cO-�—��alw 2.211. s0 . I ...... ....Cgs ■. I 1161 iva 0610 s%R 10:lh lMC i itn PRTGIPVIB 41-4522-405-cc 1616L4 01 WI$ 20.64 THE L•YER PRT41PVLI AS-4322-452-CL 20.64 . — ----_--J -i...Cgs !M9 -•� 16+411 aumm 61.0o uwsurE a ruRr cwtrmvucus 2aiu:-$van �Gl J 9t Aa . ..l ..... ..Pus p.l ._ 1 s n..:ao-uwsl »cgs 1llas •>iis�iR11 w+ 011[s/6S G 't,'I 3.„1 r;ra.6Ml silk•• ... .4y pr�.'fi:. .rRNY• 11s1�/.•+�.• I»e.'.•�IJi{'. . Y. 1•?, _ ,(� I. _ - - - - .� a'.... ...F.n i.A.:..... .. ... L;._r_.. Li.. a . _-;is F;y'�fr,.; .'i•%i k!��.v: '; irfsri�4 TONS CITT Or ORONO CHECK REGISTER C6-10-85 PAGE 4 1 I1CN DESCRIPTION _._ IC[OLL7 NO. IGY. f P.O. L n(SI IG( S' 2.700.00 • • - ..... _ ___._. _. __..—_-_—.—____... _ _ - - - .... CIS ._ __1�1434 G/O/!S 43.65 GONG LGFC GLASS__ NMI ELOGI(GCS AS. 61 _ 141419 L&PSISS 1.22 LONG LF PORE TPICT:F PUCLSILU!(S 12-4220-511-5I J._LI�Sf ul/JSr!) —CG/tI/t5 4.95_ Le" U_ra 0 TRACTOR PULLS/LUS[S_ i3-4220-549-92 • 14F141, ---_----{.50 --- LONG LN rat TRACTOR _ FY[LS/lV![! 24-4220-540-s! 5 I4.0! . ..-CIS _. 1 --1414AI CGlt$In ___1.50_ tat.FIT I"; (Gulp Cy45H-»C-ai__ .__�uM4_S!FC.? _- V 0'• 1f1456 CaliblaS 2/.4y N4GYSTN•UC4NNC C(FYr/SCNCCLS CI-43S6-1T4-13 yw... ..«COS n -• IfN/�I11----�2.G41.2f ---!C TFO Y43T( CONT4OL SIC �[42I lLC_--- C1.Ul0-25LiS�-- - -- - - 0" 2.941.25 .••..• •••-CPS •� Itu)__vf/uLu_.___17/.40...__ TNT 0/-4235-245-42_ -L3—RSJjL71SS_--)i_ _i!!..._. -- _ 4 a 161414 06107//5 11.46 PIGM.SGs00 UTILITIES 01.4124-O/9-12 =_10ii 9.4/ r[_SN(4[3(0 YTWIt[t.--- 01-4324-129-!1 Ull f/ /IS—tIS.35 .I INC Gs s CO U11 LI t I C 5 —�2-4314.s 4 a/I---' 0• 1616" 0f/OS/a N.^.o PIIM G44CO PNt PLT L NA 12.420.141.11 161411 96/05115 7.00 4N 0[N[r IT SSSN HEALTH 141 1.4 sT-12;:11 1.00 • LI5l2 OGPoSAf 0S d0 4144[SOtf 1p10 I4L [[YIP//T SrG[iCSS 7b4212-)/F 51 Y' •. Ml)Ss i CfUO3/sS 'i .' H0.17�yy��� \ NS/ YTI IIII[S 0.4324.09Al2 . �Y�1 f-i r._1.T„ M t, a-1s/YlYtg•'-t.}i. vi -;r... ►1'.�,..2 +' 1915 CITY Of ORONO CHECK REGISTER 06-10-85 PACE S i L7 _N[,i13( _,4NOUNT, 4000_____ C[5[RIPLEON. I[[OW/ NO. SHY• I P.O. I XE35kGC__ �—CPECK _ ...9E _ ___ __[l[X _ _. tt M' Ib ISS9 06/05/a5 165.45 ASP UTILITIES 01-4524-129-31 y6G051SS 166.99 ...___ASP_ 1RlLl lIL S CI-4!24-245-4E ',• lot$$$ C6IC5191 6.99 ASP l'TILITI I• CI-4!:4-29C-61 9' 161559 06/ESI05 1,174.79 MSP UTILITIES 72-1121-511-51 '• Ir� �_1a 1559 G4IOSIp__ _ ASP - - TI 12 13-4324-569-52 " Iat$$9 W/0f 1as 41.90 - "So -- -- - _9TILI UTILITIES 14-4324-S90-93 - -----�--_, )" 66.34 NORTHWESTERN TELEPHONE to151C__06/05145 161570 06/05gS __T_ NORTHWESTERN BELL.. DELL TELEPHONE - - - _ 01.4!20.osv-12 — 1'• 1611?0%15?0 06/C5/15 35.34 35.64 N9gNJ[STERN SELL TCLLPH/N[ CI-4!20-069-ts C1-U20-069-11 •€ _161370_ 9_6iCSINS___. 169.37NORTHWESTERN_ ___ TELEPHONE 01-4320-124-31 161110 L6IE5II1 69.Is NORTHWESTERN PELL_ . AC LL TELEPHONE ----���C1-4320-174-11 ----- - '1^ 161570 Oe/[SIH 70.^t %ORT4YESTCl1A SELL TELEPHONE C1.4720.249-42 •I ,_105/0.__1gfJGIlti__,13'26NOPIMW[SrP R... BELL __'__TCLEPHSAE 72.4370-S49-it o 161f70 Of ICS IGS 10.91 KORTHKSTERk SELL TLLEPPC,E------- 73-4320-S69-52 - --� --- 1" 161$70 C6/03/15 107.36 NOPTNJCSTEEN SELL TELEPHONE 74-4320-S90-93 b1$79 Os/C3//S 109.3E AO,g1I9CA!CSk_1(LL _._._sjY(wf J2 U9 74-43:l-S9Q33__. C As •' 161312 H6/0510 9.43 OMAN/LYLE MILEAGE CI-4111-174-33 ' 161590 06/OS/IS ----- --� 3.60 OTTER BRCS INC ST ART SLY - ------ _C1-4233-249-42-- )'• 3.60 r I Y- 1,C 161597 W sit 161591 As u As _ _ PEAS 5C1-441-040 /6-5/19 -- 01-47N-040.13 —��---� PER& 516-5011 [1-N41-OS9-14 _uPA.. SGftjL n!-4141-069-11_ PEAR S06-5115 C1-{141-099-17 PER, 5/6-1119 CI-4141-111-31 PER, 516.5011 (1-4141.115.31 PEAS S/6-1I1/ CI-4141-121-31 -- -- PCRA 5I6-1/19 C1-4141-12"l1 41-290-e1 41.432-cc _ 41-515-10 41-549-91 3�15 Itiii�A: �'�•'�y►—y .-u .. INS Clit or CAERE CHECK REGISTER Ca10-45 PAGE 6 i CMCCM ._DATE AMOVNT AMIN _ ITCP OCSCPIPItON _ RCCOLNT No. IAN. . P.O. r N[f S1G[ ._ -CPS _ ---- 16160P -W5185 3a60.00 PAMELL KERR RASTER 1964 AUCIT 01-4ICO-020.11 �•• • 161 W6 06/05/RI 'r2S.Oo PAMCLL RCRR FORS TER /9Ja AUDIT 11-4sCO-SIS-90 -isiete ulitf l6s __.-seC.^0-__.._.PINNCLL-R[Pp ruSTu _-HJ4'ADC I1 72-43C0-545.41 141600 C61r.s/25 125.00 PAMELL RCRR FORSTER N64 AUDIT 77-4)CO-569-92 • _._ 16140606/ slas 290.10 FINK[LL-KERR- FCASTEA__i9A_4_AUOiT___ _._ 14.43c0-S90-53 ._-- • ...cps 'a 161612 C6/Cs/•s 3.00 FEARS$ DEEP NICK ST POT AUTO 01-4141-249-42 , _ 161612 Ds c`s __ _ -Fl.u.9-sev. v: ."--" ----_--. ..Cps. II1620 00/Cs llS 501.90-_--CO M.1LL iPi 6 SONs VINE PUICM 11-N12-51S-so 7bNt s-SIS-4C 101620 Q6/OSAs 6.16 --12.l CO P41LLI-S -ED A SONS "--siNc-OISC AINL Ot SC - -'-- n-aeu-vs-se -7-TH/2c 06%tSieS r- PHILLIPS { SO4i 101 .14 i :. • :. _4rs.^6 _PJPMA+. M.tR A ASSOC __ ccTAl r[p ___ _ - - 01-47C1-060-16 C1.41t2-OIDN4 - -• 10621._� Gfc)CIi___-- 16162• 2.254.t6 P2.0.M McIR 6 ASSCC ASSCC CCUPI CCNSULTINc CI-4:OS-C1C-14 061b/1s L112! U6/ellst S_______.�25.10 604.15 POPMAI P6Pa4. MI, Nltp { }.ASSCC ____CONSULtiMC _". CI-41C1-1/MSs `- _14L21__flO/C1,/J. w 62A U6i0 ORf 294.;n PIVMIM MASK 6 ASSOC CONIULIM C1.15a1-24/-A2 141621 061051H 1.04S.00 POPM.M MAIR { ASICC CONIULIIAI C1.A 7C S-NC-11 ..�40.60-... - - POPM.M_"AIR. l_AAs GC. CM JU LT Al. _._ ___41.630-40S-00 U •4303-405-CC _ _ •, �. M625 Ou0s165 r69.60 POP.A. "alp 6 4Ss CC CM IULT146 45.47C3-412-00 L. • �^ 16162F 06/0111, 1,40.60 PJPH.M Mats 6 NICK CONSULIIM ..-Cps • 1616311 COIC5111 .. .96 aVill -1 YI M[ to ua IUIICM .19• QUQITI ai N[ Ce LIG DISC /1-aHbSi s.10 A40 Kan TTI_P{15t_[f YIM �iVA C� ___ __71.4412-515-40 .11- Quill Tl MIN[ CO MINE DISC 71.4I17-51Y1c .91 6uK(TI MIME CO RI1 POACH 11.4620-s1S-90 ..-COS NHS1 .. outs HS I70.S6 S62CLLIIC IAO INC E6UIW ATAL ZruN•AO-Ii-'-- no.0 aim Tir. ,,wii Fins is CON No :i yy FICA sno-6/2 at-4242-0s9-14 M It 1995 CITY 01 CRCNC CFCCA REGISTER C(-10-9! PAGE 7 IT9tlEC.-No._.ON E_—_-piOU4,_- -_-._ _ Y(NOOi __I!Em_OCSCAIPCIVk -, ACCOUNT NO. INY. V.O. I MESSAGE '0'I 161112 00/Cf/11 167.91 ST TREAS SS CON PO FICA S/2E-6/2 (I•N 42•J09-i! •• i161712__1_0[C J 1As 19.61_S I_It C A 3 SS CON FO_ FICA C1-4142-099-I1 'I 161712 06/05/15 60.10 IT "CIS SS COY PO _S/10.M F;[A _- 5/2:-6/2 f1-1142-11S-11 ---_ "--------- )•161-711 06105/4S 29S.36 ST T4-6S SS C04 TO FICA 5120-6/2 Cl-1142-476-33 ^� 111112 ZO/Q7I!! 53 Si 1AI AS SS CON IC IICA 5/2C•C/2 Cl-N42-249-42 is ' A Ili 061 SM _J29. _ 10.93 ST TRCAS 33 CON I FICA 5/2C•6/2 -- :1-t142-290-1/ - ---"-- )' lei pit 96/C7/15 3.S1 ST 79' AS SS CON TO IICa 5/20.6/J 15-1141-432-EC A �)1LT12_06LSJ/U i9.99 "$6.79 _. $I TAEIS SS CON TO F(CA 5120-6/2 11-1142-515-9C 161712 1' 06IC5141 "- ST TRE'S-SS CON FO "- -FICA WC-Cl; _ - - 12-41,42-349-91 1 TRIM 06/o/15 126.31 ST IREAS IS CON TO FICA 5/7C-6/2 71.4142-569-92 19.99 S[ TRESS SS CC, TO S/2J-212 14-4112-590-91 10M.40 -.'_ _ _ _ _FICA 1 --_-111.20--_-CON - - •A' 161140 16/Cl/1• STRETCHER SUNSIRNG S4PPLIC•_- CI-1241-129-1-1 �' A! 1•^' ...... .. —Cgs A U1119 a ' .61CS/Is 2.110.90---IRACT OIL CO-- -�- GAMINE" -_-- 161Fr9 96/95/05 119.60 TRACI OIL CO FUELS/LURII 14-lt20-190"l ) „• q 11A1 ' 06/OfI1! —� I .Oa0.J0 IO N COUIP CO -_--- qT FN/PL1 _ " "- -72-4141-949H1�— .. 1.040.00 A U !. .u..' ...Cgs ' ''• YALUI ouOvV_ 120.22 Mll[S_El30uCI3.S.0 IONI►_[[IS 1lC C[37_2i•}2 32-149.1112.22 _ I-: /•1GU Ol/o NS J »1Rn u•/nns ;161 elL01tJ! 161tau 01/Ol/6S /y1 ( 16M6s Y6/G)/f' VITI&TA LA40 ROVER Ewtrntvleuu a-u32-t9o-e1 -- 11.63 YR10FI IICNM ELECTRIC UTILITIES 01 Z4324-F{Aa7 11.43 A ___1.31.EI AJJWILVS iT UCJRC _.9A13Ai�l U._ 01-f 221-121-1 141.92 AN SURPLUS STORE INC MEANING AFP C1-4111-129-1 201.64 • r . -9•f �r1'!,)il�lillaS:W'�'i"� 4, /9.00. ,1 '-r is • � ..✓.� % .�Y ,•6 N+e*�G2JYc9�l�p�' 1�fSiwFt$ •' .` ;r J �rMl1yyyy.,, //���� '9.1' jy •��.Yy,,yy 7+1 .. 1r J1.'�i 51 r r ./ .l r•-r.!`. 1 19P5 CITY Of OR0110 CHECK REGISTER 06-I0-e5 FAGS a �^ .� [MCfS�Il. DRTL 6Nquyr ___ YLvgov ____yrzN ccscRis SION ACCOUNT No. INN. Y P.0. t HEISAGE •� 161 vu3__ 0e /Ss /e5 w.0000 i�NS}_ltgNs� __ISeN�x 902 _ m.x 7Ca-oq0-a0 40. • 1e1 so4 ..s/o'Es 0GO CMCP LAWN MAY PLO6_14005 CI-4343-290-tl 161105 C6/CStu 10.00 J01_1" YEN SNC AVER SCI D1.25Co-000-00 _ •-ENS i ______ _ _ _ - — - _ _ -_-- - __ Kt7l9 WcsIYS 102.41 PRIOR WINE MIME FYRCP 71-1912-SIS-50 MANUAL MC1_169 0.41051 5 �.19_- vR]OS _YI N• YI4E DESC.______71-L11 •.-SIS-if PSNVSL K/7t9 C6/0115 57.29 PR:OR YINC NIA PLAIN it-4120-SIS-f0--- ----PAPbAt '1" 17600 • y MC757U 04/b IS 1. 95.42 EO PNILLIPS YIML IMGP _- -- ��--ThH12-S1S-90 PAWAL K7770 06/CS/45 71.91. CO PNILLIPS MINE Oise 7t-fH7-SiS-f0 MANUAL L_NC71r00G/05Iis 51.910_,_rED. PNILLIPS___._.. YI 4E,.SIISG 71-481I-SIS-90 MANUAL.,__ 0CF77C 06/CS/eS 71.91 CD PNILLIPS NIN( CISC71- N 1A•S1S•i0----------- MANUAL )" 1.513.11 • ' i i K7311 Oe/[S PIS 275.61 OYIl7T9 Y2 NC ------YIM[ 1URCM--�-- --71-U12-S/S-f0 MANUAL Kim 06/05/e5 4.67. OUNLITY WINE NINE DISC 71-4115-515-91 PANLAL ' " PP772 00I0I41 770.71 EO P4!LLI-$ LID PUACM 71-4l10-SIS-50 MANUAL A __ S.42__Lo L:LLI•s_—.—__L2e DISC 7l-Alil.sts-90 MANUAL ^ KI312 06/05/65 31F.06 CO PNILLIPS _ _ WINE PUPCN _ _ 11-4112-515-50 _ _ _ MANUAL -- 7 KE372 06105/13 6.74• LO PNt LLI" WINE Disc 1P4E13-51"0 MANUAL )^ KI713 06/01/62 1.757.14 CATGGS CCDPCR LIQ PVACP 71.4 SIG-511-90 YSNUAL KIM 06uc5Fos 21 Is GA.LI S C-C20ER �l1 'CLsc n-441l-S15-s0 Aural_ � __.._. — _ - 7` Am Y! atjssm 221�tA iN 1CN COMIL JYG YINL_IW (� 1bU12-SIS-90 PANUAL •- ACT SIR 06105115 4.50- INTERCONIL PIG MINE CIS C—71�N17-S1f-f0 --- pAMLAL Pi J^� 224.52 . SS ACN15 6/[ /ID Y.�3 1Yg1\I YIN[ YIIIE IYAb ---7 t�41/}-715�10------MIWAL ,'•� ••i K1 A15 06/05/85 1.H- QUALITY NINE NINE Disc 71-4f17-515-90 RONAL iJ ' j...... .... CIS __ !S.?C1.1T FUND OSTOTAL Qf4f A SL AQ_._-____ - __ 1�{ 711. )9 FUND tS f0\Al 1915 SPECASSESSMENT FUR — — -- 9.1)S.10 FU9D 71 TOTAL LIQUOR OPCNAII44 FUND ±• n1' '1 _2,pmol FM_L2_jji!L EATER OruATLIG FUND 2.041.55 FUND 77 ICTAL SCYU OPERATING FUND _ l 2.951.21 FUND 14 TOTAL 6CLF COURSE CPERATING FC dH.S i7r TOTAL .+ �. _ ♦ .*.Pby •. 'Cr. +'J.� :i1IL�). .II•t� 'L.7 .v'LY:4r :N�r.,i9�r {••.^�1f'iG�..-. .. •y:Y, f. .� Planning Commission Pnye�°F3 Counci i "�l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 2 PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE (--It) _. ? S- PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from aqenda) 2. FAOJ-O U/ C,)g Is 2 n ,P°$Pr"cT CRYs-r4C .BAY SFW 6. jJpF!'—s�Y Gii__c ��1��,-.� '� } ". . ��e.i / ¢' et!✓-e'l%/+� _< 7. L�'7.cvua.�`� /02 S'/ jf-lti[c1" v is —7— G—T/ �f% � V� (�c.A<\ 9 0 LLrJ S /a29 '02i IAl 2_ 3.NR/1i 61z,.1 11 Si •>fSf Ls,I\ K<\ 4. 12z ,, 6. a... - 7. n9. 0. 1/ _ I= R Planning Commission Council PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE 6 1D'LQX PLEASE FILL OUT TNF INFORMP^ION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 2. 3. 4. 1 i 5. �.IeQ �InC "r - ) l ' zy 11. 6. % ) / 7. ,( :. I 44/'� � Icy > � b S E 11 0. 9� No,SlfaRl: �Q 5,ow-.'le 1.Al A , 3. J W. ` - `, J . 1 e W� Planning Commission P'1` 3 W3 Council PUBLIC ATTENDANCF CITY OF .',RONO MEETING DATE btu w� PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER Ne ,1� (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 2. ;rLiu i ,- SUr 3. M I nfo r in a-�� f on -:]E +eoofvl s clomne'l, I M" CO.Nf.. MEETING JUfi 101085 ot CITY OF MONO TO: Mayor and City CougyQll FROM: Mark Bernhardsor`\��9 A P� V DATE: June 3, 1985 SUBJECT: City Participation - Past Project Assessments The following information provides a summary as background for Councilmembers, should the issue of past projects be raised by persons at the Council meeting June 10, 1985, regarding the City's past prac'.ce of participation in special assessment payments. Research has provided .,s with the following information regarding each of the individual projects: 1. Water Project 70-1 ($1.4 Million) This .as orfgtnaily known as the Navarre water project a.0hough Casco Circle, ShorehiI is and Fagerness Point were added to this project. Originally this entire project was to be 100% assessed however, the project provided for 133 future assessment units for commercial development. (This was in part anticipated as the IDS development was under consideration at that point) With the anticipated development not taking place th Council did establish a levy starting in 1975 for the funding of this project. This levy was done fo, the years collectable 1975 to 1984 for a tota. of approximately $227,900. Subsequent levies have peen cancelled a it is anticipated that this may well be r=paid out the remaining balance to the PIR fund .nen the bonds are fully paid. 2. Sewer Assessment 73-1 ($1,467,000) This assessment was initially assessed 100% with no general tax levy intended however, subsequent appeals and settlement resulted in o reduction in the assessment. These reductions however w not funded out of the general tax rev es 's, p. ayments and available interest income a ab,. to defray the cost of the reduction. The :d for any tax levy was cancelled when this debt issue of September 1, 1974, was refunded along with the two debt issues of August 1, 1970. (It is presently anticipated that a minimum of $250,090 balance in 1991 when all PIR Bonds for 70-1 and 73-1 are paid.) 3. Sewer Proect 80-1($931,000) This project was assessed at 3011 o7 [Ae total however, a resulting re- assessment reduced the unit assessment by ✓crying amounts depending on the location of the effected properties made possible by 'he fact that the project was over bonded and income was generated off this together with the fact that the interest rate that the bonds sold at was considerably less than subsequent investment was able to earn. There was a levy for 3 years which totaled $53,600. This levy however was not needed and it is anticipated that the balance in this fund when the bonds are fully paid will be approximately $335,000 in 1996. 4. Sewer Project 1971-1 This was a small project tot aling TS45,000 rn the Dunwoody are a. This project was split on a 50/50 assessment basis with the City, with $26,500 levied on the general property taxes although this was subsequently reduced by $3,100. This project is the only one that we are aware in which the Council initially did anything other than a 100% total assessment of the project. Given the relatively small nature of the project we feel that this does not seL a precedent particularly since subsequent sewer project appraisals w-re 1.00% and these later assessments were of a magnatitude that were considerably larger. Questions have additionally been raised given the fact that the Crystal Bay area was part of the original French Lake sewer district when initially established and were assessed approximately $110.00 per acre for that project even though the area did not receive sewer at the time. It has additionally been mentioned by the residents of the neighborhood that they were in part assessed for the school to a total of $150,000 when the school (now the Art Center) was erected. I: is our understanding that the school district sold this for a otal of $140,000. There was no recognition of those initially asr—zed for the school in :.abating any of that amount. It is staff_ consideration of this item that this is a matter between the residents and the school district as to how this matter was dealt with. If you have any further comments please feel free to contact me. To: Mayor Butler, Orono Council Members From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Date: June '7, 1985 Subject: 1984 Financial Statement - City of Orono Attached, please find the following received this week from Pannell, Kerr 6 Forster: a) Letter addressing publication requirements and manager operations. b) 1984 Financial Statement As Tom Kuehn will be on vacation for the next few weeks, we have requested the auditor be present for discussion with the Council at the July 8, 1985 meeting. At a time when auditing firms nationally have become signi- ficantly more cautious in rendering opinions due to isolated yet significant problems in the auditing of selected priva.e sector firms, an "unqualified" opinion (although no guarantee of a problem -free financial future) reflects well on the excellent efforts of both Council and staff in prudent financial manage- ment. I would like to specifically recognize Tom Kuehn for an expert job of financial accounting and administration together with the very capable efforts of Joanne Lattin and Charlotte Knutson. Should you have any significant questions or comments that you would like addressed by the auditor on July 8th, please let me know. cc: Personnel Files April 25, 1985 To the City Council City of Orono PANNELL KERR FORSTER Cerltlea Public Accounanls 410 Park National Bona Bldg 5353 Weyrata Boulevard Minnea col i MN 55116 Telednone 16121545-0121 The purpose of this letter is to communicate to you our general observations and comments of the City's financial position, accounting system, and interne. controls. Therefore, by its nature, it may be critical but meant nevertheless to be constructive. There are asi•ects of the City's procedures not included or rommented upon here that constitute strong features of the accounting and inter- nal control system. Publication Requirements The 1984 Minnesota Legislative Session enacted a Public Notice Reform Bill, which substantially altered all City publishing requirements, Included are new financial statement publication requirements under Minnesota Statutes 471.697 and 471.698. The City lover 2,501) pop.) must now publish a five -page prescribed format summary financial report by July 30, 19d5, in the City's oflical newspaper. Three of the required pages are in the City's audit report. We would be pleased to assist the City in compiling the remaining pages of the diiii sure statement. Liquor Store Inventory and operations - Graphic Information In our management letter to you last year, we made a few comments about your liquor store inventory. The first suggestion was to perform the phys- ical count of inventory at year-end rather than in March and September. This year the City counted inventory on January 1st. It may be incon- venient to the City's staff, however, we found the inventory much m:re accurate, and efficient to account for than in the previous year, In future years, the City might want to consider taking the inventory on the morning of the first working day of the new year. The amount of business on that morning 1s usually minimal, and therefore, could be worked arwnd quite easily, Several of our municipal liquor store clients remain closed until noon on the first Working day of the year r, allow enough time to count at lust the stock on the sale. fluor. Deliveries are then segre- gated and restocking shelves is halted until the reml .-ring cvunts car Le taken. The second comment made regarding inventory last year leritain,d to I vee- tory levels. Inventory has been reduced slightly over the previous year. We believe it IS still higher than it needs to be, espec.ally with declining sale. Chat the tore 10 experiencing. We have IncloA 1 tw, graphs which allow inventory and operation trends am relationshils. "a industry averages are from Rcbert Morns Associates amoral %tataent stu- dios for retell liquor store., 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3ji- 2 O 1961 500 ♦50 4VO 350 300 Tc T[ b 1 250 0 av 200 150 100 SO O INVENTORY TURNOVER ORONO MUNICIPAL LIOUOR STORE 1932 1983 FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31. a ACTUAL ♦ INDUSTRY AVERAGE OPERATING TREND ORONO MUNICIPAL LIOVOR STORE 1964 1961 1962 1963 1964 FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 o SALES • OOST Of SALES A AET INCOME City of Orono - 3 - April 25, 19185 Condition of Financial Records Last year the City's financial statements required several changes in accounting policies in order to comply with Generally Accepted Accounting Principals (GAAP). The City's financial records for the current year required very few adjustments. They were the typical tpe of adjustments that are almost impossible to detect until the audit :s underway. This being the second year we have audited your City, we were able to more deeply observe and analyze your accounting system. The financial records were in excellent condition and the accounting system was working effi- ciently and accurately. One area of potential improvement we - -iced is in fixed asset accounting. The City does have a good fixed asset system. Recordkeeping for additions, deletions, and the reconciliation of December 31 balances could be mere systematic and efficient. The result would be improved records, with less effort. We would be pleased to discuss these recommendations with you and to assist with any changes you wish to make. We also wish to express our tnanxs for the cour- tesy and assistance extended to us during the course of our examination. Very truly yours, P' 'L KEir FORSTER Donald D. Anfinson, Partner DDA:b]s CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA I N D E X Page City Council and Other Officials 1 Accountants' Report Letter 2 General Purpose Financial Statements; Combined Balance Sheet - All Fund Types and Account Groups 3 - 4 Combined Statement of Reve-ie, Expenditures, and Changes In Fund Balancrs - All Governmental Fund Types 5 - 6 Statement of Revenue and Expenditures - Budget and Actual - General and Special Revenue Funds 7 - B Combined Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings - All Proprietary Fund Types g Combined Statement of Changes io tinancial Position - All Proprietary Fund Types 10 Notes to Financial Statements 11 - 19 Accompanying Information: General Fund - Balance Sheet 20 Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance - budget and Actual 21 - 24 Special Revenue Funds - Combining Balance Sheet 25 - 16 Combining Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 27 - 2S Debt Service Funds Balance Eheet 29 Statement of Revenue, ' oenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 30 Capitr' Projects Fund - Balance ;:meet 31 Statement of Revenue, Expenditires, and Changes in Fund balance 32 Special Assessment Funds - Combining Balance Sheet 33 - 34 Combining Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 35 - 36 Enterprise Funds - CoMlning Balance Sheet 3' - 36 Combining Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Fatal ngs 3- - 42 Combining Statement of Changes In Financial PoaltiOn 43 - 44 Exhibits - Assessed V ations, Tax Levies, and Miil •atv.. 41, Debt Serv: Aegulrementa and Sources of Financinu - General iAigati. r, Bonds y. Future Ad Valorem Levies to Prtlre h„nds i' Accountants' Report on Internal Arta,unting tnntr.,lr: 4 1, r CITY OF ORONO `• HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Me 6, A �.. t ^Y COUNCIL AND OTHER OFFICIALS Year Ended December 31, 1984 f' Term of Office From _m Tc rCity Council: QMayor Mary C. Butler 1/1/83 12/31/84 Councilmembers Timothy Adams 1/1/83 12/31/86 GThomas Frahm 1/1/83 12/31/86 James Grabek 1/1/83 12/31/84 John C. 4ammerel 1/1/83 12/31/84 C CCity Administrator palter R. Benson Finance C+re•:tor - Treasurer Thomas M. Kuehn CAssistant Finance Director - Deputy Treasurer - City Clerk Joanne Lattln CDeputy City Clerk C Dorothy Hallin r r r -1- ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT LETTEP PANNELL KERR FORSTER Certified Public Accuuntant5 410 Park National Bank Bldg 5353 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis MN 55416 Telephone t6l21 545-0421 To the City Council and Residents City of Orono, Minnesota We have examined the General Purpose Financial Statements of the City of Orono, Minnesota, as of and for the 19ar ended December 31, 1984, as listed in the index. Our examination was mace in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and, accordingly, included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. In our opinion, the General Purpose Financial Statements referred to above lrr- aent fairly the financial position of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at DecemLFr 31, 1984, and the results of its operations, changes in fund balances, and changes in financial position of the Proprietary Fund Types for the year then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a basis consistent with that of the preceding year after giving effect to the change, with whir`) we concur, in the method of accounting for vacation and severance pay li, lities in the General Long -Term Debt Account Group as described in Note 5 to the financial statements. t�. Our examination was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the General Purpose Financial Statements taken as a whole. The accompanying information as listed in the index is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the General Purpose Financial Statements. Such information has teen subjected to the auditinq procedures applied in our examination of the General Purpose Financial Statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated it, all material respects in relation to the General Purpose kinanciai Statements taken as a whole. Certified Public Accountants Minnoapolis, Minnesota April 25, 1985 GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CITY OF ORONO COMBINED BALANCE SHEET ALL FUND TYPES AND ACCOUNT GROUPS As of December 31, 1984 Governmental Fund Types Special Dr-ht General Revenue Service ASSET:; Cash and investments $2,115,330 $ 350,729 $ 4,498 Receivables: Accounts Accrued interest Taxes - delinquent (Note 2) Special assessments Contract for deed (Note 4) Due from other funds (Note. 8) Due from other governmental units Inventories Prepaid expense Unam3rtized bond discount Property, plant, and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation (Note 3) Amount available in Debt Service Fund (Note 5) Amount to be privided for debt service (Note 5) Total Assets LIABILITIES AND FUND EVUITY Liabilities: Accounts and contracts payable Salaries payable Due to other furis (Note 8) Due to other governmental units Deferred revenue (Note 4) Long-term debt (Note 5) Total Liabilities Fund Equity: Investment in general fixed assets (Note 3) Contributed equity (Note 6) Retained earnings Fund balance - Unreserved - Desi-Inated for ea:ergency contingenciRs Designated for capital projects Designated for debt service indevignatsd Total Fund Equity Total Liabilities and fund 10Iuity 4,258 54,031 8,89, 127 100,47U 2, 370 93, 333 4,033 27,1 15 11,902 7, 4 72 4,746 162 t,377 $2,390,473 $ 394,369 $ 6,002 $ 64, 61 3 $ 4,358 31 , 1 77 24,632 4,033 6,683 93, 333 225,438 8,391 23S,850 $ 6,002 1,929,185 385,978 20 165, 035 385,978 6,002 $2,390,471 $ 394,369 5 6,002 No w eM - 3 - Proprietary Account Groups Fund Type General Totals Capital Special Long -Term General Only) Projects Assessment Enterprise Debt Fixed Assets _(Memorandum 1984 1983 ' $ 63,455 $1, 654, 1 73 $ 234,933 $ 4,423,118 $ 4,250,622 563 146,894 151,715 158,785 1,788 43,315 6,970 115,122 49,879 4,620 105,090 82,170 1,394,368 16,901 1,413,639 1,693,659 93, 333 3,563 87,533 19,544 141,788 195,033 487,940 507,314 529,489 ' 2,568 120,844 128,158 141,907 162 1,137 21,910 23,287 24,812 5,846,672 $ 998,640 6,845,312 6,815,953 $ 6,002 6,002 5,820 239,575 239,575 184,432 r$ 68,806 $3,209,050 $ 6,880,698 $ 245,577 $ 998,640 $14,193,615 $14,133,698 $ 4,033 $ 1 3, 546 $ 18,930 $ 105,480 $ 115,689 7,571 38,748 35,944 7,564 100,559 141,788 195,uj3 11 12,3S4 19,048 23,126 207,313 300,646 216,843 2,785,000 $ 245,577 3,030,577 3,330,000 4,033 2,806,121 346,727 245,577 3,636,287 3,916,635 $ 998,640 998,640 982,583 5,745,225 5,745,225 5,777,968 788,746 788,746 714,076 ' 235, 850 211,885 64,773 64,773 76,394 31 5, 505 321 , 507 204. 8-3 87,424 i 2,402,587 2,249,284 64,773 402,929 -_ 6,533,971 998,640 10,557,328 10,217,063 $ 68,806 $3,209,050 $ 6,880,698 $ 245,577 $ 998,640 $14,193,615 $14,133,698 6pe N,at.e4 to Financial Statements. - 4 CITY OF ORONO COMBINED STATEMENT of REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - ALI. G0 VERNMF:NTAI. FUND TYPES Year Ended December 31, 1984 Revenue: Taxes ad valorem Special assessments Licenses and permits Intergovernmental revenue Charges for services Fines Other revenue - Interest on iirvestments Sale or rent of property Miscellaneous Total Revenue Expenditures: General government Public safety Streets Parks and rezreation Miscellaneous Water and sewer capital outlay Capital projects Debt service Total Expenditures Excess of Revenue Over (Under) Expenditures Other Financinq Sources (Uses): Operatinq transfers in (Note 8) Operatinq transfers out (Note 8) Added (appiie:i) to amount to be provided for debt service Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) EXCESS OF REVENUE AND OTHER SOURCES OVER (UNDER) EXPF.NDITURE.s AND OTHEk USES Fund balance - Beginning of Year Fund Ba larwo- - End of Year Special Debt General Revenue Service S 892, 41 5 4,963 1 02, 958 364,053 S 47,020 S 43,722 438,643 46,400 190,704 34,101 565 1 2, 067 9,727 15,310 2,061,930 96,431 44,287 439,274 34,561 916,147 2,406 360,053 1 2, 812 37,865 6,681 33,274 4,041 21,596 15,739 44,105 1,786,613 97,836 _ 44,105 275,317 (1,405) 182 41,404 76,556 (57,604) (45, 350-0 (16,200) 31,200 $ 259,117 $ 29,795 $ 182 1,905,918 356,183 5182? $2,165,035 $ 385,978 S 6,'102 - 5 - .. r+ Tot.+ly w Capital Special _ _(Memorandum Only) Projects Assessment _ 1984 1983 A $ 40,345 $ 932,760 $ 825,843 149,396 1 54, 359 541,306 102,958 71,243 A 6,135 460,930 512,982 `# 438,643 376,032 46,400 37,518 A $ 7,327 155,676 388,373 312,211 1i 12, 067 3,900 8,081 33,118 20,276 7, 327 359,633 2,569,608 2,701,311 473,835 386,576 N 918,553 857,102 �! 372,865 327,547 44,546 30,628 12,683 49,998 53,024 21,596 1,320 18,948 131,549 166,236 307,089 �r 200,341 244,446 251,686 18,948 344,573 2,292,075 2,214,972 _ ( 1 1 , 621 ) 1 5, 060 277, 5 j .) 486,334 117,960 118,031 ►� (102,960) (132,034) Iiw (1O,2`,2) (10,252) (464,749) (t0,252) 4,748 (478,752) �w $ ( 1 1 , 52' I $ 4, 8n,, $ 282, 2111 $ 7,5117 _ 76,394 _ 398,121 �2,742,430 2,734,849 LS 64,773 $ 402,929 $ 3,024,717 $ 2,742,436 _ L Sep w)tp4 t- Finan,,ial StatPm-fits. L - fI - an CITY OF' ORONO COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES BUDGET AND ACTUAL GENERAL AND SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Year Ended December 31, 1984 Revenue: Taxes ad valorem Licenses and permits Intergovernmental revenue Charges for services Fines Other revenue - Interest on investments Sale or rent of property Miscellaneous Total Revenue Expenditures: General government Public safety Streets Parks and recreation Water and sewer capital outlay Capital projects General Fund Over (Under) Budget Actual Budget S 886,066 S 892,415 S 6,349 36,000 102,958 66,958 350,470 364,053 1 3, 583 391,599 438,643 47,044 20,238 46,400 26,162 80,000 190,704 110,704 3,600 1 2, 067 8,467 4,350 14,690 10,340 1,772,323 2,061,930 289,607 • 421,203 439,274 18,071 913,434 916,147 2, 71 3 353,043 360,053 7,010 41,139 37,865 (3,274) Miscellaneous 29,195 33,274 4,079 Total Expenditures 1,758,014 1,786,613 28,599 Excess of Revenue Over (tinder) Expenditures 14,309 275,317 261,008 Other Financing Sources (Uses): Operating transfers in Operating transfers out Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) EXCESS OF REVENUE AND OTHER SOURCES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES 53,15U 41,404 (11,746) (57,604) (57,604) _ (4,454) (16,200) (tt,746) S 9,855 S 259,117 $ 244,262 04 M - 7 - - M Special Revenue Funds Over (Under) budget _ _Actual Budget $ 2A, 000 47,020 $ 1 9, 020 10, 520 34,101 23,581 3,480 15,310 _ 11 830 _ 42,000 96,431 54,431 1,000 34,561 3 3, 561 500 2,406 1,906 23,112 1 2, 81 2 (10,300) 11,200 6,681 (4,519) 21,596 21,596 15, 7 3'i 15, 7 39 4,041 4,041 _ ----35, 81 2 971836 62,024 6,188 (1,405) (7,5?3) 77,154 76,55h (59H) �. (62170n) (45,35(! 17,344 14,454 31 , 20n 16,740 S 20, 641 S 29, 79r� S Sege Notpv to Financial .St4t•r+ents. - �4 - Am CITY OF ORONO COMBINED STATEM174T OF REVENUE, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN RETAINFL EAF:NINGS ALL PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES Year Ended December 31, 1984 Enterprise Funds Sales and Cost of Sales: 1984 1983 Sales S 431,037 S 455,850 Cost of sales 306,933 321,190 Gross Profit 124,104 134,660 Operating Revenue: Metered water sales 130,895 104,600 User charges 308,734 286,765 Green fees 52,589 50,629 Shared cost by other governments 1,516 44,311 Equipment rental 14,057 12,075 Other 3,715 7,801 Total Operating Revenue 511,506 506,181 Total Gross Profit and Operating Revenue 635,610 640,841 Operatinq Expenses: Personal services 230,399 216,931 Purchased water 29,580 17,209 Sewer disposal charges 175,936 163,036 Professional services 10,097 6,804 Operating and maintenance supplies 23,127 22,002 Heat, light, and power 36,736 38,274 Depreciation 155,305 149,812 Rent, buildings, and equipment 19,532 19,860 Maintenance and repairs 30,964 21,157 Administrative and office expense 32,814 29,53b Other expenses 4,794 5,814 Dotal Operating Expenses 690,457 Operating Loss _749,274 (113,664) (49,616) Nonoperating Revenue (Expense): Interest on investments, assets sold to other yvv., and interfund loans 47,802 41,U33 Amortization of deterred gain 9,530 9,530 Other income 274 8,5U0 Interest expense interfund loans (2,313) (21671) Total Nonoperating Revenue (Expense) 55,293 5t,392 Net Income (loss) before Operating Transfers and _ Charcle to Contributed Equity (58,371) 6,776 Operatinq transfers in 44,003 Operating transfers (out) (15,000) (30,000) Applied to contributed equity (40,002) Add: Credit for depreciation on contributed assets 148,041 143,794 NFT INC1)MF 71, PFTAINFL EARNINGS $ 74,6711 5 124,571 Fetained earnings - beginning of year _714,076 5li9�505 ketatned Earnings - Fnd of Year $76tt 746 714.076 tote Notes to Financial statements. - y - CITY OF ORONO COMBINE[; STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL PUSIIIUN ALL PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES Year Ended December 31, 1984 Enterprise Funds 1984 1983 . Sources of Working Capital: Net income (loss) before operating transfers and chatge to contributed equity S (58,371) S 6,776 Items not affecting working capital - .w Depreciation 155,305 149,812 ► Total Working Capital Provided from Operations 96,934 156,5b8 Transfers from other funds 44,0(,3 �. Contributed capital 115,298 402,703 Reduction of other assets 17,992 Increase in long-term liabilities 59,579 pe Total Working Capital Provided 230,224 662,873 Uses of Working Capital: Additions to property, plant, and equipment 168,607 407,336 Transfers to other funds 15,000 30,000 Increase in other 4- ets 706,224 Reduction of other .abilities 11,973 4,347 Total Working Capital Used 195,58u 547007 M Increase in Working Capital $ 34,644 S 114,966 Changes in Components of Wo-king Capital: Increase (decrease) in current assets - M Cash and investments $ 1Fi,488 S 159,851 Accounts receivable (7,072) 40,424 Interest receivable 7,087 1,033 tp Delinquent special assessments receivable 4,255 (19,142) Due from other funds (1,903) (24,1400 Due from other governmental units 571 (22,402) Inventories (14,393) 6,441 Prepaid expenses (429) (3,283) ~ (Increase) decrease in current liabilities - Accounts payable 5,580 (11,922) Accrued salaries payable (444) (462) r Due to other funds 25,304 (414) Due to other governmental units (2,400) t3,557) to Deferred gain - mcc r Increase in Work:.ng Capital $ 34,644 S 114,966 to Is abee Nctes to Financial Statements. - 10 - CITY OF ORONO NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 1984 Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The City operates under "Optional Plan A" form of government as defined in the State of Minnesota Statutes. The City Council, composed of an elected mayor and four elected trustees or councilmembers, exercises legislative authority and determines all matters of policy. The accounting policies of the City conform to generally accepted accounting principles as applicable to governments. The following is a summary of the more significant policies: A. REPORTING ENTITY - In accordance with National Council on Governmental Accounting (NCGA) Statement Number 3, these financial statements include all funds and account groups over which the City exercises oversight responsibility. B. FUND ACCOUNTING - The accounts of the City are organized on the basis of funds and account groups, each of which is considered a separate accounting entity. The City maintains the following funds, grouped by fund type and account groups: (1) Governmental Fund Types a) General Fund - The General Fund is the general operating fund of the City. It is used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. b) Special Revenue Funds - Special Revenue Funs are used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources (other than special assessments, expendable trusts, or major capital pro)ects) that are legally restricted to expenditures for specified purposes. c) Debt Service Funds - Debt Service Funds are used to account for the accumulation of resources for, and the payment of, general long-term debt principal, interest, and related costs. d) Capital Projects Funds - Capital Projects Funds are used to account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of mayor capital facilities (other then those financed by proprietary funds, special assessment funds, and trust funds). e) S pPrIA1 Assessments Funds - Special Assessments Funds are used to account fur the financing of public improvements or services deemed to benefit the propertieg against which special assessments are levied. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued December 31, 1984 Note is Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Continued (z) Proprietary Fund Types - a) Enterprise Funds - Enterprise Funds are used to account for operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises --where the intent of the governing body is that the costs of providing goods or services to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recover..a primarily through user charges. (3) Account. Groups - a) General Fixed Assets - This separate group of accounts contains the fixed assets of the governmental fund types. b) General Long -Term Debt - This group of accounts contains the long-term obligations of the City other than those liabilities included in the Proprietary and Special Assessment Funds. C. bASIS OF ACCOUNTING - (1) Modified Accrual - Governmental funds are accounted for using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Their revenue is recognized when it becomes measurable ar,.. available as net current assets. Their expenditures are generally recognized when the related fund liability is incurred. (2) Accrual - Proprietary funds are accounted for using the accrual basis of accounting. Their revenue is recognized when it is earned and expenses are recognized when they are incurred. 1). INVESTMENTS - Investments are stated at cost, which approximates market value. Earnings or, investments are allocated to the individual funds based upon the average of month -end cash and investment balances. E.. INVENTORY - Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market on the tirst-in, first -out basis. x. PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMFNT - Fixed asset: are stated at cus!, estimated costs, or in the case of contribut.ons, at fair merk.,t value at the time received. (1) General Fixed Assets Account Groul - General fixed assets arr not depreciated. Tne cast ut property, )plant, and equipownt. are accounted for ass current. expenditure-- of ttie y<;vernsrental fund types in the your purchased. - 1'� - NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued December 31, 1984 Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Continued F. PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT - Continued (2) Pr prietary Fund Types - Fixed assets of the proprietary funds are depreciated using the straight-line method over the esti- mated useful lives of assets, as follows: Buildings 25 - 50 Years Distribution/Collection System 10 - 40 Years Equipment 3 - 10 Years Depreciation on contributed assets charged to operations is closed to contributed capital. G. BOND DISCOUNTS - Bond discounts are amortized annually over the life of the related bond issue. H. BUDGET - The amounts shown in the financial statements as "Budget" represent the original budget amounts based on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Budgets are adopted annually by the Council. Only those funds for which budgets are adopted are included in the "Combined Statement of Revenue and Expenditures - Budget and Actual." No other funds, or portions of funds, had budgets adopted. I. TOTAL MEMORANDUM ONLY COLUMNS - Because the accounting system is organized and operated on a fund basis, the columns on the combined financial statements captioned, "Total (Memorandum Only)" are pre- sented for informational purposes only, and are not intended to present consolidated intc oration. Note 2: Property Taxes A property tax levy is approves by Council resolution and certified to the county auditor for collection. Property taxes attach an enforce- able lien on taxable property within the City on January 1. A portion of the property taxes levied is paid by the State of Minnesota through homestead and other tax credits which are included in intergovernmental revertue in the financial statements. An allowance for uncollectible taxes is not considered necessary based on the City's collection experience in recent years. .w ft w W - 13 - W NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued December 31, 1984 Note 3: Property, Plant, and Equipment A. Proprietary fund type property, plant, and equipment: Golf Municipal Water Sewer Course Liquor Operating Operating Operating Total Land and land improvements $ 25,132 $ 127,977 $ 153,109 buildings and build- ing improvements 77,694 S 31,014 28,135 136,843 Equipment $ 26,488 29,920 17,009 42,122 115,539 Distribution/�:ollec- tion system _1,559,248 5,545,006 7,104,254 Total 26,488 1,691,994 5,593,029 196,234 7,509,745 Less accumulated depreciation 21,223 420,012 1,186,434 35,404 1,663,073 Net S 5,265 $1,271,982 $4,406,595 $ 162,830 $5,846,672 F. Statement of changes in General Fixed Assets by major classification: Balance Balance beginrinq End of Year Additions Deletions of Year Land and land improve- ments $ 431,241 $ (44,946) $ 386,295 Buildinas and building improvements 145,958 145,95b Equipment 405,384 $ 116,837 (55,834) 466,387 Total S 982,583 $ 116,837 $(100,780) $ 99B 640 Note 4: Deferred Revenue A. SEWER OPERATING ENTERPRISE FUND, MCC - This amount represents the gain resulting from the sale of the City's sewer treatment facilities to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC'). The remaining balances due from MWCC totals $478,3O6 for the facilities and $9,634 for reserve capa- city charges and are included in Due From Other Governmental Units as of December 31, 1984. The total sales price of each portion of the facili- ties will be received over thirty years with interest at 4% per annun by credits against the annual sewage handling charges of MWLC. Composition of the deferred balance is as follows: Remaininq Deferred Facility Year Gain Treatment Works 1971 S 6,280 1963 Interceptor 1r)77 18b,435 1965 Interceptor 1977 _ 12,59b Total Deferred S 2(7,313 - 14 - NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATE:MI.NTS - Continued December 31, 1984 Note 4: Deferred Revenue - Continued B. GENERAL FUND, CONTRACT FOR DEED - The City sold a section of land to a homeowners association on a Contract for Deea, in February 1984. The sales price of $100,000 will be received in equal quarterly payments over a 15 year period, without interest. The remaining $93,333 balance on the Contract at December 31, 1984, is shown as deferred revenue in the General Fund, until collected and available to finance current operations. The receivable reflects total future payments rather than net present valise because the entire receivable is offset by deferred revenue. Note 5: Long -Term Debt A. Components of Long -Term Debt: General Long -Term Debt: General obligation bonds - State -aid road bonds Vacation and severance benefits payat;le Total General Long -Term Debt Special Assessment Debt: Final Original Interest Issue Maturity Issue Rate Date Date Balance Eno of Year $270,000 5.25 - 5.40% 7-01-79 4-01-8b $ 145,00 N/A N/ A N/A N/A 10U,577 245,57, Improv. Bonds of 1971 $1,130,000 4.00 - 5.40% 2-01-71 2-01-87 230,00.- G.O. Ref. Bonds of 1976 $2,635,000 5.5U - 6.00% 8-01-76 2-01-91 1,180,000 Improv. bonds of 1980 $1,100,000 7.10 - 8.75% 12-01-80 3-01-96 900,007 Improv. Bonds of 1982 $475,000 6.50 - 10.00. 12-01-82 3-01-99 475,00 Total Special Assessment Debt 2,785,000 Total All Long -Term Debt $3,03U,57: B. Statement of Changes in Long -Term Debt: General ST*cia1 Long -Term Assessment Debt Debt Total Long-term debt, beginning of year $ 1dU1000 $3,150,000 $3,330,000 Debt retired (35,000) (365,Uuu) l4UU.000) Net change in vacation and severance benefits E.ayab le 100 577 - - 100,577 Long -Term Iaeht, Eno of Year $ 2451577 0Uu $3,U30,577 - 15 - NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued December 31, 1984 Note 5: Lony-Term Debt - Continued C. Minimum Annual Principal and Interest Payments Required to Retire Long -Term Debt Excluding Vacation and Severance benefits Payable: General Special Year Ending Obligation Assessment December 31, Bonds Debt Total 1985 $ 41,859 $ 581,179 $ 623,038 1986 39,986 586,254 626,240 1987 42,970 521,255 564,225 1988 35,945 380,069 416,014 1989 361,637 361,637 1990-1999 1,246,068 1,248,068 Total $ 160,760 $3,678,462 $3,839,222 D. Descriptions and Restrictions of Long -Term Debt: General Obligation Bonds - These bonds were issued for improvements or projects which benefit the City as a whole and are, therefore, repaid from ad valorem levies. Vacation and Severance Benefits Payable - This liability represents vested benefits earned by employees through the end of the year, which will be paid or used in future periods. Special Assessment Bonds - These bonds were issued to finance various improvements and will be repaid primarily from special assessments levied on the properti.s benefiting from the improvements. Some issues are partly financed by ad valorem levies. The Refunding Bonds of 1976 were issued to refund the Improvement Bonds of 1970A, 1970B, and 1974. The liability for these assets and liabilities relating to these refunded issues are not inclu'l-i in these ::naucial statements. F. Resources to Meet Future Debt Requirements: Amounts Available for Long -Term Debt - Available fund balance designated for repayment of long-term debt include: Debt service funds Special assessment funds $6,002 $315,505 Amount to be provided in General Long -Tern. Debt group of accounts represents future state -aid payments designated for repayment of the state -aid road bond and future fundinq of severance ana vaca- tion benefits. Future tax levies of $230,800 are available, it necessary, to retire Special Assessment Debt. 0 ==I= NOTES TO FV,ANCIAL STATEMFNTS - Continued December 31, 1984 Note 6: Proprietary Funds Contributed Capital This balance represents the cost of property contributed to the Enterprise Funds by the City, less depreciation thereon charged to operatiorv;. Changes occurring in this account during the year were as follows: Balance - beginning of year Add: Assets contributed during year Less: Depreciation on contributed assets Balance - End of Year Golf Water Sewer Course Operating Operating Operating Total $1,261,720 $4,361,579 $ 154,669 $5,777,96b 115,298 115,298 (32,038) (113,433) (2,570) (148,041) $1,229,682 $4,363,444 S 152,099 $5,745,225 Note 7: Segment Information for Enterprise Funds The City provides services which are accounted for in the Enterprise Funds. The segment information for these Enterprise Funds for the year ended December 31, 1984, is as follows: Municipal Golf Liquor water Sewer Course Operating Operating Operating Operating Total Operating Revenue or Gross Profit $ 120,252 $ 131,022 $ 313,808 S 70,528 S 635,610 Depreciation Expense $ 1,730 $ 36,266 $ 114,161 $ 3,148 $ 155,305 Income (Loss) before Operating Transfers $ 9,118 $ (17,972) $ (53,566) $ 4,049 $ (58,371) Operating Transfers In (Out) $ (15,000) $ (15,000) Net working Capital $ 124,147 $ 5,657 $ 252,153 $ 3U,041 $ 411,998 Property, Plant, and Equipment - Additions $ 100 $ 9,808 $ 158,299 $ 400 $ 168,607 Total Equity $ 129,412 $1,260,538 $4,951,150 $192,871 $6,533,971 - 17 - �,. NOTES 7) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued December 31, 1984 s . aw ' Note 8: Individual Fund Disclosures A. Interfund receivables and payables at year end: General Fund Special Revenue Funds - Revenue Sharing Fund Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund Capital Project Fund - State Aid Construction Fund Special Assessment Funds - 1966-76 Improvement Fund 1980 Improvement Fund Enterprise Funds - Water Operating Fund Sewer Operating Fund Totals Interfund Interfund Receivable Payable $ 4,033 $ 29,632 4,033 27,115 3,563 87,533 7,564 20,590 19,544 79,969 $ 141,768 $ 141,788 B. Interfund operating transfers made during the year. - Funds From Tu Amount Purpose General Building $ 20,000 Capital Projects Improvement and Capital Outlay General Equipment Outlay S 37,604 Expenditures Capital Outlay Revenue Sharing General $ 26,404 Expenditures Improvement and Capital Outlay Revenue Sharing Equipment Outlay $ 18,952 Expenditures Annual Profit Liqucr Operating General $ 15,ODU Transfer C. Other Individual Fund Information: No deficit fund balances existed at year end. Expenditures did not exceed apprupriations (budget) on any individual tund. - 18 - NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued December 31, 1984 - Note 9: Pension Plans Substantially all City employees are covered by a statewide contribu- tory retirement plan operated by the Public Employees' Retirement Association (PERA). The City records pension expense as the contribu- tions come due. Contributions for 1984 were $83,373. Contribution rates are determined on a statewide basis and include provisions for .. prior service costs. The assets of the State of Minnesota PERA Fund were substantially less than the actuarially computed value of vested benefits as of the most recent valuation date. That part of the deficiency attributable to the City is not determinable. ACCOMPANYING INFOPMATION I I CITY OF ORONO GENERAL FUND COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET ^ Comparative as of December 31, 1984 and 1983 M; 1984 1983 ASSETS Cash and investments $2,115,330 $1,904,207 Receivables: Accounts 4,258 4,819 Accrued interest 54,031 22,174 Delinquent taxes 100,470 78,348 w Special assessments 2,370 423 IM Contract for deed 93,333 Due from other funds 4,033 14,954 Due from other governmental units Inventories 11,9U2 4,746 3,744 3,505 Prepaid expenses 70b Total Assets $2,390,473 $2,032,882 LIABILITIES ANL FUN[, E�,UITY Liabilities: Accounts payable $ 58,055 $ 40,936 Contracts payable 6,558 3,955 Accrued salaries payable 31,177 28,817 Due to other funds 29,632 40,096 Due to other governmental units 6,683 13,16Q Deferred revenue - contract for deed 93,333 Total Liabilities 225,438 126,964 M Fund Equity: t. Fund balance - Unreserved - Designated for emergencies 235,85U 211,885 Undesignated 1,929,185 1,694,033 Total Fund Equity 20165,035 1,905,91b i rll Total Liabilities and Fund Equity $2,39U,473 $2,032,bd2 - 20 - M CITY OF' ORONO GENERAL FUND STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL Year Ended December 31, 1984 With Comparative Actual Amount for Year Ended December 31, 1983 1984 _ 1983 _ Over (Under) Budget Actual Budget Actual Revenue: _ _ Taxes - Ad valorem taxes $ 886,066 $ 879,044 $ (7,022) 5 764,507 Penalties and interest 13,371 13,371 20,435 Total Taxes 886,066 892,415 6,349 _ 784,942 Licenses and permits Licenses 9,300 8,678 (622) 14,11J6 Permits 26,700 94,280 67,580 57,137 Total Licenses and Permits 36,000 102,958 66,958 71,243 Intergovernmental revenue - State grants - Local government aid 151,640 155,876 4,236 236,905 Homestead credit 135,36() 136,523 1,163 136,473 Reduced assessment credit 197 Attached machinery aid 386 Civil defense 4,000 9,242 5,242 3,318 Police town aid 34,970 34,592 (378) 33,237 Police training reimbursement 2,080 2,080 Municipal state -aid, streets 24,500 25,740 1,240 22,085 Total Intergovernmental Revenue 350,470 364,053 13,583 432,601 Charges for services - General government 18,500 61,632 43,132 54,113 Public safety 373,099 377,011 3,912 321,919 Total Charges for Services 391,599 438,643 47,044 376,032 Fines 200238 46,400 26,162 37,518 Other revenue - Interest on investments 80,000 190,704 110,704 145,557 P-nts 3,600 5,400 1,800 3,900 Payment in lieu of taxes 2,000 3,007 1,Uu7 2,555 Refunds and reimbursements 3,629 3,b29 8,3U9 Special assessments 2,35u 4,963 2,613 Proceeds from contract fur deed - land sale 6,bb7 6,667 Miscellaneous 30091 3, C`91 1,362 Total Other Revenue ___ 87�950 _ 217,461_ 129,511 _ _161,6,13 Totd/ PeVenue 1,772,32 2,Ub1,93u 289,607 1,8b4,V19 .. .w r V., M - Continued - r a� GENERAL FUND - Continued STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAI Year Ended December 31, 1984 With Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31, 1983 Expenditures: General government - Mayor and council - Personal services Supplies Other services and charges Administration - Personal services Supplies Other services and charges Capital outlay Elections - Personal services Supplies Other services and charges Assessing - Personal services Supplies Other services and charges Finance - Personal serviceE Supplies Other services and charges Capital outlay Legal - Other services and charges Human rights - Other services and charges General government buildings - Personal services Supplies, Other services and charges Capital outlay Total General Government 1984 19b3 Over (Under) Budget Actual Budget Actual 13,510 13,393 (117) 12,883 250 47 (203) 420 30,480 43,783 13,303 22,162 44,240 57,223 12,983 35,465 93,280 89,715 (3,565) 86,956 5,275 5,326 51 5,762 8,322 8,651 329 14,270 203 106,877 103,692 (3,185) 107,191 10,587 7,485 (3,102) 2,b16 500 638 138 9 5,965 5,645 (320) 5�jd 17,052 13,768 (3,2b4) 3,333 10,251 5,743 (4,508) 9,101 85U 587 (263) 313 42,535 58,116 15,581 30,336 53,63E 64,446 10,810 39,75U 67,268 68,788 1,52U 64,084 1,450 1,585 135 1,373 18,910 19,bbl 951 17,562 119 87,628 _ 90,234 2,6Ub 83,13b 69,000 67,241 (1,759) 67,784 4,504 4,459 (45) 3,626 12,561 9,618 (2,943) 6,198 1,500 1,391 (109) 1,341-1 24,205 27,202 2,997 24,324 _38t266 1 677 __ _ 38,211 (55) 33,539 411,203 _ 439,274 18,071 _ 373,82t> - 22 - - continuej - GENERAL FUND - Con. ?d S OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND UiANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL. Year Ended December 31, 1984 With Comparative Actual Accounts for Year Ended December 31, 1983 Expenditures - Continued: Public safety - Police protection - Personal so-rvices Supplies Other services and charges Capital outlay Fire protection - Personal services Contracted fire protection Protective inspection and zoning - Personal services Supplies Other services and charges Capital outlay Civil defense - Supplies Other services and charges Animal control - Personal services Other services and charges Total Public Safety Streets - Personal services Supplies Other services and charges Capital outlay Total Streets Parks and recreation 1984 19t+3 Over (Under) Budget Actual Budget Actual 521,266 510,468 (10,798) 478,367 38,950 45,250 6,300 37,262 55,187 55,167 (20) 47,748 30,850 33,788 2,938 20,756 646,253 644,673 (1,580) 584,133 93 93 114 112,526 118,942 6,416 128,295 112,526 ! 119,035 6,509 128,409 114,631 120,386 5,755 105,505 6,700 7,469 769 6,193 23,809 17,354 (6,455) 23,495 _ 1,197 145,140 145,209 69 136,390 900 934 34 859 965 845 (120) 1,592 1,865 1,779 (86) 2,451 80 80 7,650 5,371 (2,279) 4,770 7,650 5,451 (2,199) 4,77U 913,434 916,147 2,713 856,153 152,589 148,634 (3,955) 147,574 152,UU0 141,125 (10,875) 119,018 48,454 70,294 21,84U 56,072 1,364 353,043 360,053 7,010 324,028 Personal services 32,774 28,575 (4,199) 23,76u Supplies 3,49`j 3,505 10 3,451 Other services and charge; 4_,87o 5 78S 915 3,41_7 Total narks and Recreation 41,13-a 37,865 (3,274) 3(-,62r - Cont ::::rd - - 23 - A GENERAL FUND - Continued STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL Year Ended December 31, 1984 With Comparative Actual Amount for December 31, 1983 Expenditures - Continued: t"+ Miscellaneous - Health Engineering Private improvements General equipment purchases Contingency Total Miscellaneous Total Expenditures Excess of Revenue Over (Under) Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses): Operating transfers in (out) - From Liquor Fund From Revenue Sharing Fund To P molding Fund To Sewer Operating Fund To Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) EXCESS OF REVENUE AND OTHER SOURCES OVER EXPENDITUREf,' AND OTHER USES Fund balance - Beginninq of Year r Fund Balance - End of Year t� r 1984 1983 O ve r (Under) Budget Actual Budget Actual 3,775 (3,775) 5,420 1,472 (3,948) 1,244 10,598 10,598 11,060 19,257 20,000 21,204 1,204 15,815 29,195 33,274 4,079 47,376 -1,758,014 1,786,613 _ 28,599 1,632,011 14,309 275,317 261,O08 232,008 30,U00 15,000 (15,00u) 30,000 23,150 26,404 3,254 29,911 (20,000) (20,O00) (30,000) (4,001) (37,604) (37,A04) '20,000) (4,454) (16,200) (11,746) 5,910 $ ) $ 259,117 $ 249,262 $ 237,916 1,905,918 1,668,000 $2,165,035 $1,905,918 CITY OF ORONO SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET :; cf D-member 31, 1983 With Comparative Totals for ueccmhPr 31, 1983 ASSETS Cash and investments Receivables - Accrued interest Prepaid expenses Due from other funds Due from other governmental units Total Assets LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE Liabilities: Accounts payable Due to other funds Total Liabilities Fund Balance: Unreserved - undesignated Total Liabilities and Fund Balance Revenue Community Sharing Park Development Fund Fund Fund $ 30,486 $111,136 1,284 3, 1 16 7,472 $ 39,242 $114,252 $ -0- S 4,358 4,033 8,391 30,851 $114,252 $ 39,242 $114,252 $ -0- 7 be i Improvement and Building Totals {M� Equipment Capital Outlay Fund Outlay Fund 1984 1983 S 155,884 $ 53,223 $ 350,729 $ 320,735 Pq 3,365 1,12E 8,891 3,765 ►� 162 162 27,115 27,115 43,209 /1 7,472 8,928 $ 186,526 $ 54,349 $ 394,369 S 376,637 1e Mw W $ 4,358 $ 1,569 4,033 18,885 Mn 8,391 20,454 Iw w $ 1E6,526 $ 54,340 $ 385,978 356,183 ~ S 186,526 S 54,34+ $ 394,369 $ 376,637 r. we am No is CITY OF ORONO M SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE. Year Ended December 31, 1984 ,.. With Comparative Totals for Year Ended December 31, 1983 Revenue Community Sharing Park Development Revenue: Fund Fund Fund Intergovernmental revenue - Federal grants S 29,099 S 17,921 Other revenue - Park dedication fees Interest on investments Interest on interfund loans Total Revenue Expenditures: Other services and charges - Microfiche city records Recodification Crystal Bay sanitary sewer study Stubbs Bay sanitary sewer study Other Capital outlay - Handicapped access, voting, Lakeview Elections Department equipment Street Department equipment Police Department equipment Water Department equipment Sewer Department equipment Park Department equipment Bederwood Park improvements Daniels Park improvements Hackberry Park improvements Crystal Bay playground land Crystal Bay playground improvements Antoine Park improvements Summit Park land Summit Park improvements Administration Department equipment ^inance Department equipment 'lding and Zoning Department equipment Total Expenditures Excess of Revenue Over (Under) Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses): Operating transfers in (out) - From Revenue Sharing Fund From General Fund To General Fund To Golf Course Fund To Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) EXCESS OF REVENUE AND OTHER SOURCES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES Fund balance - Beginning of Year Fund ha lance - End of Year $ 11,830 6,427 11,744 35,526 23,574 17,921 4,033 2,250 1,551 2,115 226 149 14,255 9,218 y 5,377 368 735 368 1,824 6,702 368 5,742 21,472 15,888 17,921 1 4, 054 7,686 -0- ( 2 6, 404 ) (18,952) (45,356) $ (3 1 , 302 ) $ 7,686 $ -0- 62,1S1 106,566 -0- $ 3v,851 $114,2S2 $ _0 _ i Improvement and Building Totals Equipment Capital Outlay Fund Outlay Fund 1984 1983 $ 47,020 $ 30,076 i 1 1, 830 6,290 $ 12,198 $ 3,732 34,101 27,019 i .. 3,480 3,480 2,870 1 5, 678 3,732 96,431 66,255 t� 4,033 2,250 1 2, 750 Rsl 1,551 796 2,115 924 375 271 14,255 7,435 9,218 12,812 3,519 1,339 1,339 949 660 21,596 21,596 660 6,313 6,681 735 7,537 368 6,966 1,824 6,000 6,702 1,353 368 N 3,569 5,742 3,234 E� 1,895 1,895 e� 2,910 2,910 1,067 1,067 tt __ 42,555 97,836 49,18a (26,877) 3,732 (1,405) 17,067 tf M 1 8, 952 1 8, 952 37,604 20,000 57,604 50,000 tl (26,404) (29,911) y� (40,002) (18,952) )� ,56,556 20,000 31,200 (19,913) w $ 29,679 $ 23,732 $ 29,795 $ (2,846) 1t r 156,847 30,617 356,183 359,029 �� $ 180--,526 $ 54,.349 $ 385,978 $ 356,18.3 w CITY OF ORONO DEBT SERVICE FUND COMPARATIVE. BALANCE. SHEET As of December 31, 1984 and 1983 ASSETS Cash and investments Receivables - Accrued interest Unamortized bond discount Total Assets FUND BALANCE Unreserved: Designated for Debt Service G. O. State -Aid Road Bonds of 1979 1984 1983 $ 4,498 $ 4,060 127 50 1,377 10710 $ 6,002 $ 5,820 $ 6,002 $ 5,820 am CITY OF ORONO DEBT SERVICE FUND COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AhD CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE Year Ended December 31, 1984 and 1983 Revenue: Intergovernmental revenue - State -aid - highways Miscellaneous revenue - Interest on investments Total Revenue Expenditures: Debt service - Retirement of bond principal Interest on bonds Fiscal agent fees Total Expenditures EXCESS OF REVENUE OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES Fund balance - beginning of year Fund Balance - End of Year G. 0. State -Aid Road Bonds of 1979 1984 1983 $ 43,722 S 40,445 565 285 44,287 40,730 35,000 30,000 9,055 10,730 50 50 44,105 _ 40,780 $ 182 $ (50) 5,820 5,870 $6,002 S 5,820 - 30 - CITY OF ORONO CAPITAL PROJECT FUNb COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET As of December 31, 1984 and 1983 ASSETS Cash and investments Receivables: Accrued interest Due from other funds Due from Other Governmental Units: MSA construction account Other Total Assets LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE Liabilities: Accounts payable Contracts payable Total Liabilities Fund Balance: Unreserved - Designated for capital projects Total Liabilities and Fund Balance State -Aid Construction Fund 1984 1983 $ 63,455 $ 62,088 1,788 771 3,563 2,931 10,968 $ 68,806 $ 76,758 S 393 S 364 3,640 4,033 364 64,773 76,394 $ 66,806 S 76,758 ON r ass y A CITY OF ORONO CAPITAL PROJECT FUND COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE Year Ended December 31, 1984 and 1983 Revenue: Intergovernmental revenue - State -aid for construction Other revenue - Interest on investments Total Revenue Expenditures: Capital projects - McCulley Road, leq.l, engineering, and sexlcoating Semaphore - Highway 12 at Old Crystal Bay Road, construction Project reviews, legal and engineering Willow Drive overlay Miscellaneous Total Expenditures EXCESS OF REVENUE OVFR (UNDEF) EXPENDITU!-1:S Fund valance - beginning of year Fund Balance - End of Year State -Aid Construction Fund i1984 1983 S 2,931 $ 7,327 4,018 7,327 6,949 11,553 52 1,045 1,886 7,395 _ 60 +18.946 3.043 S(11,621) S 3,906 76,394 72,4b8 S 64,773 $ 76,394 - 32 - CITY OF ORONO SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FUNDS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET As of December 31, 1984 With Comparative Totals for December 31, 1983 Permanent Improvement 1966 - 76 Revolving Improvement ASSETS Fund Fund Cash and investments $ 92,758 $ 1,042,790 Receivables: Accrued interest 3,245 27,448 Delinquent taxes 181 2,782 Delinquent special assessments 27 54,040 Deferred special assessments 1,586 359,601 Miscellaneous 563 Due from other funds 87,533 Inventory, water meters 2,568 Unamortized bond discount Amount to be provided for debt service Total Assets $ 100,928 $ 1,574,194 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES Liabilities: Accounts payable $ 4,692 Contracts payable 8,801 Due to other funds Due to other governmental units 11 Special assessment bonds payable S 1,410,000 Total Liabilities 1 3, 504 1,410,000 Fund Balance: Unreserved - Designated for debt service 164,194 Undesignated 87,424 Total Fund Balance 87,424 164,194 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 100,928 S 1,574,194 no 1980 1982 Totals .. Improvement Improvement Fund Fund 1984 1983 �a A $ 334,618 S 184,007 $1, 654, 1 73 $1, 743, 087 8,146 4,476 43,315 20,404 1,657 4,620 3,822 27,601 35,076 116,744 90,802 664,933 251,504 1,277,624 1,592,620 563 87,533 112,980 2,568 3,165 14,310 7,600 21,910 23,102 10,252 C$ 1,051,265 $ 482,663 $3,209,050 $3,600,234 $ 53 $ 4,745 $ 5,040 8,801 39,315 $ 7,564 7,564 7,746 11 12 900,000 475,000 2,785,000 3,150,000 907,564 475,053 2,806,1 21 3,202,113 11� 143,701 7,610 315,505 199,053 14 87,424 199,068 ti _143,701 7,610 402,929 398,121 L 1,051,265 $ 482,663 $3,209,050 $3,600,234 r w CITY OF ORONO SPEC K,L ASSESSMENT FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE Year Ended December 31, 1984 With Comparative Totals for Year Ended December 31, 1963 Rewonue: taxes - Ad valorCm taxes Penalties and interest Special assessments - Principal levied or adjustments Interest and penalties Intergovernmental - State homestead and other tax credits Other revenue - Interest on investments Miscellaneous Total Revenue Expenditures: Capital projects - ,Pr,sonel services - City staff &—ifessional services Construction costs Othe& Lesbt servi- - Interest and amortization of bond discounts Fiscal a ,ent fees Misce l lane(o.:s Total txpendi tures t,:c;ess -J Revenue Over (Under) Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses): Operating transfers in (out) - From 19dO Improvement Fund To Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Added (applied) to amount to be provided for debt service Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) EXCESS OF REVENUE AND OT'1ER SOURCES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES Fund balance - beginning of year Fund Balance - End of Year Fermdnent Improvement 1966 - 76 Revolving Improvement Fund Fund $ 1,542 $ 22,663 �.3 421 169 37,885 214 3,502 16,530 97,721 955 6,526 19,438 168,718 768 21,104 94 108,697 513 87,464 393 5,938 131,082 93,894 (111,644) 74,824 $ (111,644) $ 74,824 199,068 89,370 S 87,424 $ 1641194 1980 1982 Totals Improvement Improvement - Fund Fund 1984 1983 $ 1 5, 485 S 39,690 $ 38,341) 206 655 2,561 it 411,L )3 w 66,810 S 4 149,396 130,013 2, 41 9 6,135 6,929 ~ 27,503 13,922 155,676 132,462 E� 600 8,081 1,760 112,423 59,054 359,633 723,358 A 768 1,759 368 21,571 28,460 108,697 244, OS9 513 1, p! 75,n67 ,t.)8 199,769 210,61. 79 100 572 294 + 3,259 3,486 12,683 3,657 78,405 _ 41,192 - 344,573 489,950 34,018 1 7, 862 15, 060 233,408 � f Mbl 8, 1 20 ` (8,120) (10,252) (10,252) (464,749) _ (10,252) (10,252) (464,749) M b $ 34,018 $ 7,610 4,808 $ (231,341) 109,683 398,121 629,462 rr S 143,701 $ 7,610 $ 402,929 $ 308,121 - 36 - CIT" ENTERPRISE FUNDS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET As of December 31, 1984 With Comparative Totals for December 31, 1963 Municipal Golf ` Liquor Water Sewer Course Totals Operating Operating Operating Operating 1984 1983 ASSETS Current Assets: Cash and investments Accounts receivable Delinquent st?ecial assessment:, receivable Accrued interest receivable Due from other funds Due from other governmental units - MWCC Inventory Prepaid expense Total Current Assets Other Assets; Less Current Portion: Due from other funds Due from other governmental units - MWCC Total Other Assets $ 38,089 $ 13,416 $ 159,330 $ 24,098 $ 234,933 $ 216,445 189 146,444 261 146,894 153,966 Property, Plant, and Equipment: Land and land improvements Buildings and building improvements Equipment Distr./collection system _ Total Property, Plant, and Equipment Less: Accumulated 964 101,260 140,502 1 6, 901 165 5,050 2,443 14,856 7,432 5,727 21, 01 3 350,751 1 7, 1 01 473,084 490,185 25,132 77,694 31,014 26,488 2c' 920 1 7, 009 1,55 .248 5,545,006 26,488 1,691,994 5,593,029 16,901 9,814 791 6,970 2,715 2,443 4,346 14,856 14,285 6,425 1 20, 844 1 35, 237 429 31,575 543,841 537,237 17,101 1 9, 544 473,084 488,633 490,185 508,177 127,977 153,109 153,109 28,135 1 36, 843 105,829 42,122 115,539 99,862 7,104,254 6,988,956 198,234 7,509,745 7,347,756 depreciation 21,223 420,012 1,186,434 35,404 1,663,073 1,514,386 Net Property, Plant, and Equipment 5,265 1,271,982 4,406,595 162,830 5,846,672 5,833,370 Total Assets S 145,767 $1,292,995 $5,247,531 $ 194,405 $6,880,698 $6,87b,784 - 37 - PM 4PO is ~ Municipal Golf Liquor Water Sewer Course Totals Operating Operating Operatinq Operating 1984 1983 LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY Liabilities: Current liabilities - Accounts payable $ 9,809 $ Salaries payable 2,615 Due to otaier funds Due to other gov't units 3,931 Deferred gain - MWCC Total Current Liabilities 16,355 Long-term liabilities, less current portion - Deferred gain - MWCC Due to other funds Total Long -Term Liabilities Total Liabilities Fund Equity: Contributed capital Retained earnings Total Fund Equity Total Liabilities and Fund Equity 2,358 S 6,427 $ 33F, $ 18,930 S 24, r,10 1,655 2,224 1,077 7,571 7,127 3,489 79,969 83,458 108,762 7,854 448 121 12,354 9,954 9,530 9,530 9,530 15,356 98,598 1,534 131,843 159,883 197,783 197,7P- 207,313 17,101 17,1L 19,544 17,101 197,783 214,884 226,857 16,355 32,457 296,381 1,534 346,727 386,740 1,229,682 4,363,444 152,099 5,745,225 S,777,968 129,412 30,856 587,706 40,772 788,746 714,076 129,412 1,260,538 4,951,150 192.871 6,533,971 6,4, ,044 $ 145,767 $1,292,995 $5,247,531 $ 194,415 $6,880,698 $6,878,784 - 38 - 0 CITY OF ORONO ENTERPRISE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS of Year Ended December 31, 1984 With Comparative Totals for Year Ended December 31, 1983 p Sales and Cost of Sales: Sales Cost of sales Gross Profit Operating Revenue: Metered water sales User charges Green fees Shared cost by other governments Equipment rental Interest on accounts certified to county Other Total Operating Revenue Total Gross Profit and Operating Revenue Operating Expenses: Salaries and wages Retirement contributions Health and life insurance contributions Purchased water Sewer disposal charges Professional services Operating and maintenance supplies Heat, light, and power Depreciation Rent, buildings, and equipment Maintenance and repairs Administrative charges from General Fund Communications Office supplies Printing, publishing, and advertising Data processing Insurance Other expenses Total Operating Expenses Operating Income (Loss) Nonoperating Revenue (Expense): Interest earned on investments Interest income from MWCC Interest income from interfund loans Amortization of deferred gain Other income Interest expense on interfund loans Total Nonoperating Revenue (Expense) Met Income (Loss) before Operating Transfers and Charge to Contributed Squity Municipal Liquor Operating $ 419,509 299,257 1 20, 252 Water Operating sw $ 1 30, 895 127 131,022 1 20, 252 1 31, 022 r 66,130 36,024 6,365 4,063 4,661 1,910 29,580 1,600 1,132 1,515 6,942 4,317 18,685 1,730 36,266 14,900 1,860 3,604 2,508 608 685 874 228 80 1,285 1,733 1,388 3,214 4,809 2,156 303 114,887 146,268 5,365 (15,246) 3,479 (41si 274 -_-�-3, _ (2,313) 553 (2,726) 9,118 (17,972) - 39 - h. Golf Totals Sewer Course Operating Operating 1984 1983 pe $ 11,528 $ 431,037 $ 455,850 7,676 306,933 3211190 My 3,852 1 24, 104 1 34, 660 1 30, 895 $ 308,734 308,734 52,589 52,589 1,516 1,516 1 4, 057 14,057 3,558 30 3,715 MMM��111 313,808 66,676 511,506 313,808 70,528 635,610 104,600 286,765 50,629 44, 31 1 12,075 3,1 32 4,669 506,181 640,841 61,199 36,170 199,523 187,415 7,109 3,218 20,755 20,277 2,334 1,206 10, 1 11 9,239 29,580 17,209 175,936 175,936 163,036 6,915 450 10,097 6,804 66 8,678 5,992 23,127 22,002 1 1, 603 2,131 36,736 38,274 �++1 1 14, 161 3,148 1 55, 305 149,812 ler 570 4,062 1 9, 532 19,880 20,737 4,763 30,964 21,157 732 706 4,554 4,250 1,558 1,244 4,361 4,137 71 64 443 540 154 2,161 3,600 2, 568 2,274 5395 5,760 M 3,519 2,919 14,461 12,283 1,748 587 4,794 5,814 p� 419,298 68,821 749,274 b90,457 r (105,490) 1,707 (113,664) (49,616) V 19,525 2,342 24,933 17,472 20,556 20,556 20,890 2,313 2,313 2,671 9,530 9,530 9,530 274 8,500 (2,313) (2,671) _ 51,924 2,342 _ 55,293 56,392 (53,566) 4,049 (58, 371) 6,776 - 40 - - Continued - a ENTERPRISE FUNDS - Continued COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS ' Year Ended December 31, 1984 With Comparative Totals for Year Ended December 31, 1983 w Operating Transfers In (Out): From General Fund From Park Fund To General Fund Applied to contributed equity Credit for depreciation on contributed equity NET INCOME (LOSS) TO RETAINED EARNINGS Retained earnings - beginning of year Retained Earnings - End of Year Municipal Liquor Water Operating Operating (15,000) 32,038 $ (5,882) $ 14,066 ,. 135,294 16,790 $ 129,412 $ 30,856 - 41 - Golf Totals Sewer Course ' Operating Operating 1984 1983 4,001 r.•, 40,002 (15,000) (30,000) (40,002) 113,433 2,570 148,041 143,794 pa w $ 59,867 $ 6,619 $ 74,670 $ 124,571 Do 527,839 34,153 714,076 589,505 S 587,706 $ 40,772 $ 788,746 $ 714,076 ion W" am m 42 - CITY OF ORONO ENTERPRISE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION Year Ended December 31, 1984 With Comparative Totals for Year Ended December 31, 1983 Sources of Working Capital: Net income (loss) Items not affecting working capital - Depreciation Total Working Capital Provided from Operations Transfers from other funds Contributed capital Reduction of other assets Increase of long-term liabilities Total Working Capital Provided Uses of Working Capital: Additions to property, plant, and equipment Transfers to other funds Increase of other assets Reduction of long-term liabilities Total Working Capital Used Increase (Decrease) in Working Capital Changes in Components of Working Capital: Increase (decrease) in current assets - Cash and investments Accounts receivable Delinquent special assessments receivable Interest receivable Due trcm other funds Due from other governmental units Inventories Prepaid expenses (Increase) decrease in current liabilities - Accounts payable Accrued salaries payable Due to other funds Due to other governmental units Deferred gain Increase (Decrease) in Working Capital Municipal Liquor Water Operating Operating S 9,118 $ (17,972) 1,730 36,266 10,848 18,294 1 0, 848 100 1 5, 000 15,100 18,294 9,808 2, 44 3 12,251 S (4,252) S 6,043 S 3,627 S 7,914 (513) (275) 408 137 (13,194) (361) (192) (58) 4,335 (140) 1,417 S (4,252) 1,385 52 857 (3,608) $ 6,043 - 43 - Golf Totals Sewer Course Operating Operating 1984 1983 $ (53,566) $ 4,049 $ (58,371) $ 6,776 �w ( 114,161 3,148 155,305 149,812 60,595 7,197 - 96,934 1 56, 588 44,003 115,298 115,298 402,703 17,992 In 193,885 6 17, 992 59,579 771 77 230,224 662,873 158,299 400 168,607 407,336 in 15,000 30,000 106,224 9,530 11,973 4,347 1� 167,829 400 195,580 547,907 Iy $ 26,056 $ 6,797 $ 34,644 $ 114,966 N ►w rr $ 1,830 $ 5,117 $ 18,488 $ 159,851 `r (6,510) 226 (7,072) 40,424 .w 7,087 7,087 (19,142) 3,193 517 4,255 1,033 �+ (1,903) (1,903) (24, 346) 571 571 (22,402) �* (240) (598) (14,393) 6,441 (i46) (33) (429) (3,283) (1,799) 1,659 5,580 (11,922) (263) (93) (444) (462) r 24,447 25,304 (414) (211) 2 (2,400) (3,557) (7,255) r $ 26,056 $ 6,797 $ 34,644 $ 114,966 w ►? as - 44 - CITY G. ORONO ASSESSED VALUATIONS, TAX LEVIES, AND MILL RATES Year Ended December 31, 1984 Assessed Valuations: Real property Personal property Fiscal disparities contribution Fiscal disparities distribution Total Assessed Values Tax Levies by County Auditor: General Fund Special Assessment Funds - PIR sewer 1971 Improvement Bond 1980 Improvement Bond Total Tax Levies Mill Rates by County Auditor: General Fund Special Assessment Funds - Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund 1971 Improvement Bonds 1980 Improvement Bonds Total Mill Rates Collectible in 1985 1984 1963 $100,314,576 $ 93,709,375 $ 88,720,487 1,430,696 1,355,446 1,231,262 (1,711,293) (1,586,532) (1,319,378) 2,042,654 1,721,825 1,500,266 $102,076,633 $ 95,200,114 $ 90,132,637 $ 1,001,056 $ 1,021,513 $ 9U9,595 :,601 1,703 26,220 26,348 18,114 17,932 S 1LC-0I,056 $ 1,067,448 $ 955,578 9.778 Mills 10.741 Mills 9.778 Mills .017 .276 .19U 11.224 Mills 10.088 Mills .019 .292 .199 10.598 Mills - 45 - CITY OF ORONO ' DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS AND SOURCES OF FINANCING - GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS As of December 31, 1984 and 1983 1984 1983 Sources of Financing: Amount available in Debt Service Fund $ 6,002 $ 5,820 Amount to be provided from future state -aid highways 160,760 204,482 Total Sources of Financing 166,762 210,302 ' Debt Service Requirements: Bond principal payable 145,000 180,000 future interest on bonds 15,760 24,482 Tot 1 Debt Service Requirements 160,760 204,482 Excess of Sourc_, of Financing Over Debt Service Requirements S 6,002 S 5,820 f - 46 - CITY OF ORONO Year Collectible 1985 1986 1:87 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 FUTURE AD VALOREM LEVIES TU RETIRE BONDS As of December 31, 1984 Special Assessment Bonds 1971 1980 1982 Improvement Improvement Improvement Bonds Bonds Bonds (Note 2 (Note 2) $ 25,800 $ 18,400 30,800 18,400 Total S 56,600 18,300 18,100 17,700 17,300 16,800 16,100 15,300 14,400 $ 170,80U $ 400 1,200 70U 60U 500 $ 3,400 Total Levies (Note 2) $ 44,200 49,200 18,300 18,100 17,700 17,300 16,800 16,100 15,700 15,600 700 600 50U $ 230,800 Note 1) The levies for these issues are the general obligation ad valorem levies which are in addition to the amounts levied in the special assessment rolls. Ad valorem levies are placed (as required by law) at 105% of debt service requirements. Note 2) The City canceled the collectible 1985 tax levies totaling $44,400 scheduled to finance the retirement of Special Assessment Bonds. The City may cancel future ad valorem levies if the respective special assessment funds have suf- ficient. sources to pay future debt requirements. - 47 - ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT ON INTERNAL ACCOUNTING CONTROLS To the Ci _y Cou:. City of Orono, Minnesota PANNELL KERR FORSTER Certified Public Accountants 410 Park National Bank Bldg 5353 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis MN 55416 Telephone (612) 545-0421 We have examined the financial statements of the City r uronc for the year ended December 31, 1984, and have issued our report thereon, dated April 25, 1985. As a part of our examination, we made a study and evaluation of the City's system of internal accounting control to the extent we considered necessary to evaluate the system as required by general's accepted auditing standards. The purpose of our study and evaluation was to de. ermine the nature, timing, and extent of the auditing proce- dures necessary to express an opinion on the City's financial statements. Our sr•av and evaluation was more limited than would be necessary to express an opinion system of intp rnal accounting contto' taken as a whole. The City is ret rEible for estab'isl.inq and maintaining a system of internal accounting conic :. In fulfilling this responsibility, estimate d j, :'s by management are required to assess the expected benefits and rel. 170s .ontrol procedures. Tho objectives of a system are to provide manageme, . r, rec._.;a le, but not absolute, assurance that assets are safeguarded against loL..s from unauthorized use or dip:-sition, and that transactions are executed in accordance with management's autho• .ion and recorded properly to permit the preparation of financial statements ace ance with generally accepted accounting principles. ause of inherent li❑.itatioi.: in any system of internal accounting control, errors or irregularities may nevertheless occur and not be detected. Also, projection of any evaluation, of the system to future periods is sub3ect to the risk that procedures may become inadequate because of change., in conditions ur that the degree of compliance with the procedures m: deteriorate. Our study and evaluation made for the :invited purpose descrit n the first pares ;ph would not necessarily disclose all material weaknesses in tilt ..ystem. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the system c.• internal accounting control of * _ City taken as a whole. howe••^r, our study and evaluation disclosed that bec-wise of the limited size of your of � staff, your organization has limited segregation of duties. A good system of inter^-. .vcounting control contemplates an adequate segregation of duties so 1•at no one .,vidual handles a transacti.cn trom inception to c-�,plet�on. While we recognize thdi your office staff is not lac=,e enough to permit !Wk,.F,udte segregation of duties in all respects, it is importat . however, that aware of ltfi this condition. The foregoing conditions were considered in determin'ng the naty. -i•ns.ng, and extent of audit tests to be applied in o,:r examination of the financia: stat•_.r.ent8, and this report of such conditions dues n•::" �god.'fy our report, dated April 2�p 1985, or. such financial statements. T1'.in rel.ort is inte:cde., solely t..•r the use of management and s3houl(: not be used t-,r dry otthMr purp,•,e. Cert 1 t ied Put llr Acc-ount,int s Minneap•.�lisa, Minnrsutd April 21, 1985 INTEROFFICE M9MO 85-077 DATE: June 3, 1985 TO: Administrator Mark Bernhardson, Orono Council Mayor Kunze, Long Lake Council FROM: Chaef Mel Kilbo SUBJI `T: Citizen Appreciation Reference case file 85-1696 Mr. Myron Dean Lieske, 279 Highview, Long Lake, came in 5/31/85 at 1:45 pm, to comment on the efficent police work u,id response regarding a medical involving him that occurred 4-17-85. Officers English and Cheswick resporcaed to call about chest pain - administered oxygen and ci zked vitals. North transported to Methodist. Police respcnsz time was three minutes. ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT roa� REoORT MADE MESS IcEY CONTROL NUMBER IftAI CONT AGENCY NCIC IDENT IILr . E C 1 / �' I` � -�� U / M, N 0, 2 1 7_. r v/ DAY: S M T T F S L Wept DATE REPORTED (APO) TIME APO (TAP) LOCATION GRID NBR (LON) D / Q y 1 1 -7 ! / ' Lr / // ►LAC* COMMITTED 1►LC► _ n � L NOR HAD SOUAD OR BADGE # ISBN) TIME ASIG. CT AS) TIME AAR. (TART TIME CLA. ITCLI NBA -� UCS rICER ASSIGNED ASSISTED BY ISN Uoc �Z NSE OR INITIAL COM►LAINT OTHER /RINCI►AL. M-e/ 1 - --- COMPLAINT QOFFENDER Q VICTIM PA y fie. ,, L: e S kL- BVSINESS ADDRESS HOME ADDRFSS 17 q h �, . �. _► OTHER REPORTS INCLUDED Impewnd ❑ f ,op Inventory O Implied Consent ❑ Accident AepO" Top ❑ Inrluence Repent Q ►bores ❑ —] BUSINESS ADDRESS RE►ORTIN , rF^SON jjOFF6NDEA0VICTIM0 O.O.B HOME ADDRESS SEE CASE FILE HAD Codes P — Phone A — Radio A — Alarm — I — In ►erst V — VIWeI M — m-A T — Other BUSINL55 r•n UM1C HOME PHONE BuSINEss PHONE HOME PHONE ROLL CALL C Worn rli Release Dept. Assist Message Deliver j Treated III Transpo-ted Advised Citation Issued — Detail Completed G.O.A._ —_- - - ----- 19 s Ct SFit'r-1, II —- / J . sr--_._,L:.tkt r�z� _1�• �.-, �.�._.G�ei.;. t __ e�e 4 e� jPf .-_t,re p.. _�'�^.rs� �1 J—9L�i+r D.t S-•��a rl�— n _...� 1 _ _1�. t fA �� /L ��� ter a.• ~'�' __ ' ' I"`. � r Cpvy TO CO AITF.y (] OIFKEH•S (,1rAITNY ❑ COURT ❑ CHIEf j UTHER (.;�ru:'c1rd C!t.I•'bs eIrst Rel utt•r� s,lr'Ity Inact.e Othe+ J. 10 �yi S 1`i SUPLiiVISO N'S S!G4ATURf 275 Hiahview Lane Lon-- Lake, Mr., 55356 June 1, 1965 Sot. Chesuick Crono Police Department P. C. Box CS Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear SUt. Cheswick: I want to thank you for your quick response to our :11 call in the early morninq of April 17. Shprtly after I oot to the emercency room of Methodist Hospital, I had a heart attack. Your action helped me to oet prompt medical att=ntjon, enahlino me to survive. My wife and I cporeciate what you did for us. It's good to know you're there and are so re- sponsive. Thank you. Very trLIV yours,,/ Nyrcn Lieske I MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1985. PAGE 1 ATTENDANCE 7:30 PM The Orono Planning Commission met on the above -late with the following members present: Chairman Callahan, with members Goetten, Sime, Kelley, Taylor, and McDonald. Planning Commission member Rovegno was absent. Council representative Mayor Butler was present. Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and Recorder Sutton represented the City staff. #913 PAUL PHILLIPS 2160 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PUBLIC HEARING 7:30 - 7:39 PM Paul and Mary Phillips were present. Mark Gronberg, surveyor, was also present. Chairman Callahan called for the public hearing concerning the preliminary subdivision of Paul Phillips. Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was no one present from the public for this scheduled public hearing. Building & Zoning Admini.strator Mabusth reviewed with the Planning Commission Phillip's proposal to subdivide approximately 12 acres of his land into 4 lots. Mabusth noted that portions of the 12 acres are located within the City of Medina, but that the obvious building sites are located within the City of Orono. Chairman Callahan closed the public hearing at 7:39 p.m. Goetten moved, Sime seconded, to recommend approval of the preliminary plat application of Paul Phillips findinq all standards of the RR-1B zoning district r-d on -site septic code have been satisfied based on the following _)nditions: 1. Additional septic testing to be complete(' before applicant is schedule for Council approval --Lots 1 and 3's alternate test sites. 2. Locate existing septic system on Lot 3. 3. Approval of curb cut by Hennepin County. City to acquire drainage and utility easement over Outlot A. 4. Owner of Lot 4 must grant access easement in favor of Lot 3. 5. Future developer of lands within Medina to be served by private road within Outlot A must obtain a conditional use permit from the City of Orono prior to construction. f MINUTES OF Tilt", ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1985. PAGE 2 6. Engineer to submit necessary hydraulic information in order to determine size of retention area on Lot 1. City will ask that the area be designated as a drainage easement, the City will ask for a flowage and conservation easement over designated area. 7. Payment of park dedication fee of $600 ($200 each lot) . 8. Dedication of right-of-way of 40' for County Road 6. 9. At the time Lot 1 is developed, berming to be done along Outlot A to prevent runoff from flowing over mounds and to protect mound Eites when road is constructed. Motion, Ayes (6), Nays '0). #916 G.N. KRI14KEL i BRUCE ENGELSMA 960 i 990 PARTENNOOD LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT PUBLIC HEARING 7:45 - 7:48 PM Jeanne Krimmel and Bruce Engelsma were present. Mark Gronberg, surveyor, was also present. Chairman Callahan called for the public hearing concerning tt,p lot line rearrangement for Krimmel/Engelsma. Building 6 Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was no one present in the audience for this scheduled public hearing. Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth informed the Planning Commission of the applicants' proposal to rearrange the shared lot lines so that the existing improvements on each lot are located within their homestead lot. Mabusth advised the owner of Lot 2 that there may be a need to relocate the dock per realigned/extended side lot lines. Mabusth noted for the record the dock setbacks as follows: dock length 0-50' - 10' setback from extended lot line dock length 50-100' - 15' setback from extended lot line Chairman Callahan closed the public hearing at 7:48 p.m. Goetten moved, Kel ley seconds: i, to recommend approval of the proposed plat. of a lot line rearrangement for Krimmel and Engelsma based on the following findings: 1. The lots each contain the ri:inimum required one acre in area. 2. All existing structures meet the required setbacks from the newly created lot line. 3. Applicant has been advised that the dock located on Lot 2 may have to be relocated per the above setbacks noted by staff. Motion, Ayes; (6), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING IiEI-n MAY 20, 1985. PAGE. 3 #918 JOHN NORDSTROM 541 SPRING HILL ROAD , PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PUBLIC HEARING 8:00 - 8:29 PM Dennis Buratti, attorney from Dorsey, Whitney, law firm, was present to represent the Nordstroms. Mark Gronberg, surveyor, was also present. Chairman Callahan called for the public hearing concerning the preliminary subdivision for Nordstrom. Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. George &Patricia Partridge of 625Spring Hill Road, and Harry B. Stocker of 465 Spring Hill Road were present from the audience for this scheduled public hearing. Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained Nordstrom's proposal to subdivide his homestead lot into 5 buildable lots. m3busth noted that the old driveway will be removed up to t::a public cartwwy that serves the former Crosby, Winston and Partridge residences. Mabusth stated tha-i-- staff recommends that the proposed curb cut on Spring Hill Road be moved 60-70' eastward. Mabusth noted that all new lots have suitable area for on site development but that staff will ask for additional peres and borings for Lot 1 further east and uphill from Partridge drive and alternate tests for existing house lot. Patricia Partridge of 625 Spring Hill Road expressed her concern if the developer does not finish off the road bed requirements and yed w!.o will enforce the conditions. Partridge asked s c why the septic site is proposed so close to the lot L.ne. Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that staff will enforce the conditions of the final reso,.ution. Mabusth noted that the proposed septic test site meets the required 20' setback but that time has shown that drainfields close to a drive can create problems. Assistant Zonir., „oministrator Gaffron confirmed that the proposed septic site does meet the required 20' setback from the lot line, but staff would feel more comfortable locating the site further back from the lot line. Kelley asked staff if each lot has 2 acres dry buildable. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the wetlands area will be reconfirmed by the surveyor, Mark Gronberg. Chairman Callahan questioned staff why the City should require the applicant to abide by the DNR's setbacks from lakes when the City hasn't even adopted the DNR's standards yet and felt that this shouldn't be included in the motion. Callahan .,ed the public hearing at 8:29 p.m. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PI.ANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1985. PAGE 4 #918 NORDSTROM (CONT) Sime moved, Goetten seconded, to recommend approval of the preliminary plat application by John Nordstrom finding all standards of the RR-lB Rural Residential Zoning District and on -site septic code have been satisfied subject to the following conditions: 1. Additional septic testing required prior to scheduling application before Council for formal action. a) new peres and borings uphill to the east on Lot 1. b) alternate septic testing for Lot 3--surveyor should locate existing septic system on plan. 2. All new construction and septic installations must meet the Orono setbacks from the lake and owner is hereby advised that Orono may adopt DNR setback regul.•'_ions which require additional setbacks from the lak . 3. Describe wetl ;nd in angles and bearings within Lot 5 at 9 7 0 ' elevatioi. Designate wet.land as drainage easement. Citv to ask for conservation and flowage easement ov`r wetlands. 4. Existing drive must be removed at the time Lot 3 is served by new private road and shared drive. Road must be removed upto private cartway, and cartway is to be returned to its natural state. 5. Move curb cut on Spring Hill Road 60' to 70' t3 meet safe sight distance. 6. The City will ask for underlying road and utility easements over Outlot p--maintenance covenants for upkeep and maintenance of private road. Appl icant must submit proof within private covenants that shared drives, ownership and maintenance is shared by Lct.s 1, 2 and 3. 7. The City will ask that portions of the property involved in Lydiard Lake be dedicated to the City for public use. Since the property is abstract, the area should be described in angels and bearings, designated as drainage easements and dedication on the plat to the City for public use. 8. Payment. of $800 park dedication fee ($200/lot). 9. Building envelope for Lots 2 and 4 should be changed to reflect 200' setback from Lydiard Lake. 10. Lot 4 drainf ield may need to be relocated after are 150' Lake Lydiard. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COlf STING HELD MAY 20, 1985. PAGE 5 11. Applicant is p aced on notice there there is a non- conforming structure on Lot 3 and is subject to all pertinent ordinances. 12. Applicant to assure that each lot has 2 acres of dry buildable. Motion, Ayes (61, Nays (0). #922 CHUCK VAN EECKBOUT 2020 i 2.80 SALEM COURT LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT PUBLIC BEARING 8:35 - 8:46 PM Chuck Van Eeckhout was present. Chairman Callahan called for the public hearing concerning Van Eeckhout's proposed lot line rearrangement. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaf f ron noted the certificate of mai ling and the of f idavit of publication. Maxwell Alvord of 960 Brown Road North was present from the audience for this scheduled public hearing. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the applicant's proposal to rearrange the lot line at 2020 and 2080 Salem Court by trading equal areas in order to create a more attractive building site. Maxwell Alvord of 960 Brown Road North pointed out an existing drainage problem with the culverts. Alvord asked staff to investigate into this matter. Alvord noted after the drainage problem is solved, that he has no problems with the lot line rearrangement. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted tha,L the City was nut aware of the problem and thL` staff and City Engineer will investigate into the drainage concern. Chairman Callahan closed the public hearing at 8:46 p.m. Kelley moved, Sime _- :ded, to recommend approval of the proposed lot line rear- -:,!,gement for Chuck Van Eeckhout at 2020 and 2080 Salem Court subject to the following conditions: 1. Flowage and conservation easement over Lots 1 and 2. 2 0roinage concern raised at meeting to be investigated by City Engineer for improvement. 3. Drainage easement be granted by Lot 1 across Lot 2. Motion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1985. PAGE 6 #910 JAMES HOFF 2056 SHADYKRDOD ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 9:18 - 9:26 PM James Hoff was present. Mark Gronberg, surveyor, was present. Chairman Callahan called for the public hearing concerning Hoff's conditional use permit application to regrade his lakeshore yard. Assistant Zoning Adminis- trator Gaffron noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. Neil & Jan Blesi of 2064 iadywood Road were present from the audience for this public -iring. James Hoff explained his proposal to grade his lakeshore yard to match his neighbors yard. Hoff explained that there is a safety factor when he tries to maintain his yard and is very dangerous. Hoff noted that he plans to extend the contours of his neighbors to his own yard. Kelley asked if the applicant plans on removing the retaining .:all. Hoff confirmed that he will remove the retainii.3 wall. Hoff stated the the proposed improvements wi .1 improve the safety of the bank. Neil Blesi of 2064 Shadywood Road noted that the proposal will greatly improve the looks of the applicant's lakeshore yard and will reduce the degree of existing hazard. Blesi noted that the previous owner had regraded the lakeshore yard and because of lack of family support built the hill back up again. Blesi noted that the applicant's yard had previously been the same contours t� t were proposed. Assistant Zoning Administr. )rGaffron noted that according to the City Engineer hat the proposed contours as shown will not accomplish the applicant's objective. Chairman Callahan felt that the Planning Commission needs more information to determine if the propusal -eets the appliicant.'s objective. Callahan closed the pub. hearing at 9 ')6 p.m. Sime noted that the plan i:; not complete and is difficult to see where the contours will be. Sime noted that when the lakeshore area is graded that the applicant sod the ground right away to prevent erosion into the lake. Sime moved, Kelley sec coded, to recommend approval of the coedit, onal use permit application of James Hoff to allow t;- e grading of his lakeshore yprd based on the f-llowing findinys- 1. A,. licant's :lakeshore yard will conform better to the rn-.ghbo:s yards and will louk more aesthetic. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1985. PAGE 7 2. Proposal will reduce degree of hazardous condition existing on the property because of the slope of the land and will improve the health, safety, and welfare of the applicant's yard and neighborhood. 3. Applicant' akeshore yard previously existed as the proposal no. shows and previous owner built hill back up ,.n thereby creating extra hardship on current owner maintenance of yard. Apt.._ subject to the following conditions: 1. Regrading to be done under close supervision with staff and City Engineer to assure t' -t proposed contours will blend with the neighbors yarus. 2. City to require that the applicant have this grading done professionally and not by the applicant. 3. Proper erosion controls to be approved and sup- -ised by staff. 4. If applicant proposes steps or a stairway to the lakeshnre, applicant may not exceed existing steps or exist I am( •nt of hardcover. Motion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). #912 GORDON HEDLUND 3990 NORTH SHORE DRIVE VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 9:44 - 10:05 PM 7,crdon Hedlur.. -s Fr,..sent. Chair,iian Callahan called for the public hearing for Gordon Hedlund's variance applicat-,. ,,, to permi.t the conztructic)n of a i.ew residence. BuIlaing & Zoning Administrator Gaf.fron rioted the affidavit oi: publication ,,nd the certificate of mai', ­rj. Robert & Sue Bilger of 40%.;" Korth Shore Drive were , --sent from the audience for this public heating. Assistant Zoning Administrator Ga- Fron noted that the lot is partially located within the LR-IC an(`, LR-lB z ing district. Gaffron noted that Planning ission should decide first what zoning district standa.r. ould applv tL: thiF appli .atiori. Kelley asked aba_.c the s,Arround iny lots ir, the neighborhood and felt that the zoning r,oul i match th urrounding lo• ­ Assistant "loning Administrator Saffron tated that % Surrounding lots are mostly half -acre. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1985. PAGE 8 #912 HEDLUND (CONT) Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that an cabin existed on the property but the previous owner damaged the cabin when he tried to install a basement/foundation for the cabin. Gaffron noted the sewer is available and both lots have been assessed footage. Gaffron explained that the applicant will be limited to 2,300 sf of hardcover and it appears that the home and driveway the applicant has proposed will meet this requirement. Gaffron noted a problem with the access f rom the lot onto the "S" curve and that Hennepin County has some recommendations. Gaffron noted that Hennepin Co,-,nty made the following comments in the_ r letter dated May 14, 1985: 1. No point on the lot frontage meets the minimum sight distance requirements for a driveway location for the posted 30 mph limit. 2. Any proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved utiliti permit prior to beginning construction. 3. The developer must restore all areas within County right of way disturbed during construction. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that the County would request that a triangular area of 1,4'10 square feet be dedicated for roadway where the County r,,ad encroaches into the property. Robert i Sue Bilger of 4005 North Shore Drive stated that the "S" curve is already dangerous enough without adding another access onto the hazardous road. The Bilgers noted that - there is currently a safety problem on the "S" curve and many accidents have occured in this area. The Bilger explained that they have even had cars run into their home from that sharp 'S" curve. Gordon Hedlund stated that when he talked to Hennepin County about the access that they did not express too much concern. Hedlund noted that Hennepin County mentioned that they would need right-of-way and that they would make some recommendations, but that they weren't alarmed about the proposal. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron asked if Hedlund would be willing to use a shared driveway for access. Gordon Hedlund stated that he would be willing to share a driveway access with someone if the City required it. Sue Bilger of 4005 North Shore Drive stated using a shared driveway will not solve the existinq problem on the "S" curve. Bilger stated that the City would still be placing more traffic onto this dangerous road if this variance is approved. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PI.ANN I NG COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1985. PAGE 9 #912 HEDLUND (CONT) Gorcon Hedlund noted that there are a lot worse problems wittin Orono and throughout Hennepin County than this access point.. Chairman Callahan closed the public hearing at 10:05 p.m. Goetten ,noted that in light of the dangerous access area that shp would not be able to vote in favor of the application. Taylor move.1, Kelley seconded, to recommend denial of Hedlund's var: ance application to construct a new home based on the following findings: 1. Lot does not follow the neighborhucd pattern of existing development, being smaller than 91% of ih- developed lots -,thin 1000' cf the property. 2. Relatively unsafe county road access. 3. Applicant had forewarning that lots may be unbuildat,le prior to his purchase. 4. Denial is consistent with past denials on vacant substandard lots of this size. 5. Property could be combined with adjacent properties to the east or south, both of which are substandard in area. 6. Intent of the application is contrary to the letter and intent of the Orono Comprehensive Plan. 7. Granting of this variance would set an adverse prec -nt in the City. 8. The property falls too short of the zoning standards to justify granting of the variance. 9. There is an existing hazardous traffic: problemon the "S" curveand that an additional access onto this -oint would further the dangerous situation. Motion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1985. PAGE 10 1914 RICHARD KAUFFMANN 2696 ETHEL AVENUE VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 10:08 - 10:25 PM Richard Kauffmann was present. Chairman Callahan called for the public hearing concerning Richard Kauffmann's variance application to the average lakeshore setback line to permit the construction of a new home. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted the certificate of mailing and the of f idavit of publication. Harry& Thelma Pulver of 2691Caroline Avenue, Dorothy Kearns of 2961 Ethel Avenue, and Thomas Schmitz of 2696 Ethel Avenue were present from the audience for this application. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that the applicant wishes to construct a new residence 32 feet beyond the average setback line. Mabusth stated that the applicant has since amended his proposal to extend only 17 feet beyond the average setback line. Mabusth noted that the applicant has asked that them present structure remain in use during construction. Richard Kauffmann presented a model of the proposed home to the Planning Commission. Kauffmann explained that his (laughter and son-in-law presently live in the existing house. Kauffmann noted that he has worked with the neighbors and because of the neighbors comments he shifted the location of the home and pulled back the home to only extend 17 feet beyond the average setback line. Kauffmann stated that he has no decks that would block the neighbors view of the lakeshore. Kauf fmann stated that he proposes a screened -in porch with a walkout patio with spaced wood and sand below thit. should not be considered hardcover. Goetten asked what the highest point of the house would be. Richard Kauffmann stated approximately 29'. Kauffmann explained that he proposes a loft inside and needs the house high enough to allow space for the loft. Dorothy Kearns of 2961 expressed he. -•oncern for her view of the lake. Kelley felt that if approved no additional decks should be allowed. Zoning Administrator Mabusth advised Kauffmann that his existing dock appears to cross over the lot line. Mabusth noted that the boat attached to the dock encroaches onto Pulvers property. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CCLMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1985. PAGE 11 #914 KAUFFMANN Richard Kauffmann stated that he did not know that the dock (CONT) encroaches onto anyone's property and that the previous owner, Hamlett, was the one that installed the dock. Kauf fmann explained his proposal to extend the dock 20' and to pull the boat back from the lot line. Kauffmann stated that he will move the boat to conform to the code if confirmed that it crosses the line. Kauffmann noted that he is trying to give the Pulvers enough room and therefore shifted his home away from their lot line. Kauffmann noted that he will be saving a mature tree by pulling the home back. Kauffmann not?d his hardship to be the steep existing grade of the lot and explained his proposal to grade that down. Kelley asked the neighbors what they thought of the proposal. The neighbors stated that they can live with the proposal after Kauffmann made the changes. Chairman Callahan closed the public hearing at 10:25 p.m. Goetten moved, Taylor seconded, to recommend approval of Richard Kauffmann's variance application to permit construction of a new home into 17' of the average lakeshore setback zone based on the following findings: 1. Topography is so steep that specific construction and house location are needed to provide safe access to lake. Slope from house to lakeshore is steep. 2. Design of roof and roof elevation does not create view problems for adjacent homes. 3. The proposed improvement will not diminish surrounding property values. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant and future owner not allowed to place another deck to the lakeside of the structure and such to be filed in the chain of title. 2. Applicant to relocate dock and boat if dock is encroaching over neighbors lot line. 3. As applicant requested, existing house may remain in use during construction and then must be removed from site. Motion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). MINUTES ON THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1985. PAGE 12 TIPTON CORPORATION 1290 L.YMAN AVENUE. VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 8:49 - 9:15 PM Mike Sjeklocha of 1424 Baldur Park Road was present to represent Tipton Corporation. Chairman Callahan called for the public hearing concerning Tipton's variance application to construct a new residence on Lyman Avenue. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. Marc & Tracy Whitehead of 1220 Lyman Avenue were present from the audience for this application. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that Tipton Corporation plans to remove existing house and detached garage and sheds from site and build a new residence. Gaffron noted that the proposed house appears to meet the required front, rear and side setbacks. Gaffron noted his concern that the primary drainfield site will not meet minimum setbacks from the house, and the alternate site is not realistically capable of containing the 1,200 sf drainfield required while maintaining safe setbacks from foundations walls. Marc Whitehead of 1220 Lyman Avenue stated that there is no question that the existing buildings on the property are an eye sore, but that the size of the home proposed is too large. Whitehead stated that he thought the lot size was approximately 1 .8 acres ( closer to 2 acres) , but just found out tonight that it is 1.3 acres. Whitehead noted that he was also surprised that Tipton has already made their proposal to the City, since he and Tipton representatives had conversations relating to trading and/or buying of the lot last year. Whitehead asked to have the issue decided regarding if the driveway was to be a private driveway or vacated roadway. Sime asked Whitehead if he would be wi l ling to sell some of his acreage so that Tipton could combine it with their 1 . 3 acres. March Whitehead of 1220 Lyman Avenue stated that he might be wi l ling to sell some land, but he doesn't know how much land he has now. Whitehead noted if Tipton is willing to go to the expense of surveying his land to find out exactly how much acreage he owns, he might be willing to sc.l. Whitehead noted that he hasn't had time to investigate and see what his options would be in the future if he sold some land to Tipton. Whitehead stated that the neighbors are concerned that the building will sit. too high on the site and ask that the building be lowered so as not to be too conspiciou:,-. Whitehead asked that the City enforce the 2 acre minimum and that approving this variance for 1.3 acres could scat a precedent. MINUTES OF T11F: ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION ME:E:TING HELD MAY 20, 1985. PAGE 13 Mike Sjeklocha stated that the high point of the home will not be conspicious. Sjeklocha noted that the garage is even with the existing building now. Sjeklocha noted that he was not aware until tonight that there were problems with the septic test sites not meeting the setbacks. Sjeklocha noted that there should be no problem in moving those sites to meet the setbacks. Kelley noted that a smaller home would meet the septic test sites and suggested reducing the size of the home. Kelley noted that the home could be built on the lot as long as Gaffron approves the site. Goetten noted that the size of the house being proposed is too large for the lot and would like to see something smaller. Chairman Callahan closed the public hearing at 9:15 p.m. Callahan noted that the drainfield testing site may be alright if the house was only 3 bedrooms. McDonald moved, Sime seconded, to table Tipton Corporation's application for a variance to allow the applicant time to consider their options. Motion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). i919 T.M. SCHULTZE 1185 WYNDMERE ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 10:36 -- 10:53 PM Ted Schultze was present. Chairman Callahan called for the public hearing concerning the after -the -fact conditional use permit application by Ted Schultze. Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was no one present from the audience for this public hearing. Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that at the time of the final inspection of the Ted Schultze residence, staff noted the excavation of the pond. Mabusth stated that the pond is approximately 10, 000 sf area and is not located within a designated wetla: Mabusth explained that the pond serves as a collector L.' ,i,i for all runoff from asmalllocalized watershed. Mabust. voted that th.e pond will not change or redirect the previous drainage patterns nor have any negative effects on surrounding properties. Ted Schultze noted that he was not aware that he needed a permit for the construction of a pond and that ne was not informed by staff of the need for :i permit. Schultze noted that his pond collects drainage from the surrounding neighbors property and is equipped to handle all runoff in the area. Schultze noted that this is not to be a wildlife pond. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1985. PAGE lq #919 SCHULTZE Kelley asked staff for the definition of a wildlife pond (CONT) versus a decorative pond. Building 6 Zoning Administrator Mabusth answered that the applicant first advises whether the pond is to be a wildlife or decorative pond. Mabusth stated that if a wildlife pond is to be installed, there is a more extended review process by other agencies. Mabusth noted that the physical difference between the two ponds is that the wildlife pond has more gradual slopes with an island.' Mabusth explained that the decorative pond has sharper or steeper banks and usually no islands to encourage wildlife. Mabusth advised that the decorative pond is deeper and water quality controlled with aerator. Mabusth noted that the applicant can place swans in the pond in order to discourage other wildlife that might nest there. Chairman Callahan asked Schultze if he plans to aerate the pond. Ted Schultze concurred that he will aerate the pond. Schultze mentioned that he may rip rap the banks of the pond if needed. Schultze noted that the pond is a benefit to the neighborhood since it serves as a collector basin for the neighbors drainage. Chairman Callahan closed the public hearing at 10:53 p.m. Kelley moved, McDonald seconded, to recommend approval of the after -the -fact conditional use permit application of Ted Schultze based on the following findings: 1. The pond excavation is not located within a designated wetlands. 2. The pond will not redirect or change the localized watershed but will, if properly constructed, control the velocity of the runoff created by the surrounding improvements. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant must submit additional hydraulic information such as the elevation of the pond and specific controls on outlets and inlets, especially to the north if the applicant considers this as a possible outlet. 2. Applicant to restore entire disturbed area with suitable ground cover upon completion of land alteration. Spoils stored on edge of pond to be used in restoration. Motion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). MINUTES Oh' TIIh; ORONO I'I.ANNI NG COMMIS", 1 ON MI•;I•:'1'1 N(; HELD MAY 20, 1 985 . I'i:>. �', 15 #920 LOU FEGF.RS 3590 NORTH SHORE DRIVE VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 10:5.1 - 11 :15 PM Lou & Marilyn Fegers were present. Marty Bethke, contractor, was also present. Chairman Callahan called for the public hearing concerning Lou Feger's variance application. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was no one present in the audience for this public hearing. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained Feger's request to replace a structurally unsafe attached garage with living area. Gaf f ron stated that the attached garage's foundation is cracking and in disrepair. Gaf f ron noted that the applicant plans to make tradeoffs in hardcover by removing the portable shed and a walkway. Gaffron noted even with the proposed tradeoffs in hardcover, in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone the hardcover would increase from 3.21 to 5.0% and in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone from 53.8• to 56.8%. Goetten asked Fegers if he proposes a garage. Lou Fegers stated that he has no plans for a garage. Kelley noted that in the chain of title it place a future owi,er on notice that the hardcover on this property already exceeds the maximum allowed and that future variances for a garage may not be approved. Kelley asked what is kept in the shed. Lou Fegers noted that gardening tools are kept in the storage shed and that it is a portable shed. Fegers noted that he has temporary planks that he puts on the ground so that. he can have access to the shed when the water is high. Marty Bethke noted that they could use the special treatment under the deck so that it would not to considered hardcover. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that. his hardcover calculations took into account the condition that the applicant would remove the shed and the walkway. Gaffron stated that the applicant: could move the shed under the deck. McDonald noted that the hardship for the applicant in that he has water on both sides. Chairman Callahan closed the public hearing at 11:15 p.m. XeIley moved, Taylor seconded, to recommend approval of the Lou tegf-r's' variance, application based on the following findings: MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD HAY 20, 1985. PAGE 16 #920 FEGERS (CONT) 1. Existing garage is in disrepair and is a hazard to the health, safety, and welfare of the community. 2. Applicant has been subjected to two 0-75' lakeshore setback zones since he is surrounded by water on both sides. 3. Tradeoffs in hardcover decreases impact of proposal on the lake. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Hardcover is limited in the 0-75' setback zone to 5.0% and in the 75-250' setback zone to 56.8%, with lakeshore setback as 63' or a variance of 12'. 2. Applicant must remove shed and walkway to make tradeoffs in hardcover. 3. Railings required on deck. 4. Applicant is placed on notice that any future variances for hardcover may not be approved and that future owner is placed on notice that the property is without a garage and such variance application for a garage may not be approved. Motion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). #921 COUCH VAN BSCXBOUT 2135 BALM COURT VARIAIICR PUBLIC HEARING 11 a 19 - 11:26 PM Chuck Van Eeckhout was present. Chairman Callahan called for the public hearing concerning Van Eeckhout's variance application. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was no one present for the audience for this application. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that this variance application is a result of a construction error in which the house was placed incorrectly by the applicant's footing contractor and ended up too close to the lot line. Caffron noted that either a lot line rearrangement or a variance is needed. Chuck Van Eeckhout explained that the reason the mistake happened is because there was about 10' of snow c.n the ground at the time of the footing inspection. Van Eeckhout noted that it was virtually impossible to see the corner stakes at that time. Van Eeckhout noted that at the time the footing inspection war; made, the footings for the garage had not been chug and that the footing Inspection was only for the horse. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1985. PAGE17 #921 VAN EECKHOUT Van Eeckhout noted that the home met the setbacks at that (CONT) time, but once the footings fo►- the garage were dug it was apparent that the setbacks were 11' from the lot line. McDonald noted that the setbacks should have been confirmed by the inspector at the time of the footing inspection and should have known that the garage footings were forthcoming. Chairman Callahan closed the public hearing at 11:26 p.m. McDonald moved, Sime seconded, to recommend approval of the variance application of Chuck Van Eeckhout based on staff's error in verifying the setbacks at the time of the footing inspection. Motion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). #924 JOHN SCHERVEN 2649 CASCO POINT ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC BEARING 7:54 - 7:57 ON John Scherven was not present. Chairman Callahan called for the public hearing concerning John Scherven's conditional use permit application. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was no one present for the audience for this public hearing. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that the applicant appeared before the Planning Commission in April for an average setback variance and an addition with hardcover tradeoff. Gaffron noted that the applicant is requesting a guest apartment use to allow his parents to live in the apartment. Chairman Callahan closed the public hearing at 7:57 p.m. Kelley moved, McDonald seconded, to recommend approval of John Scherven's conditional use permit application to permit a guest use apartment subject to the folluwiny conditions: 1. The guest apartment is for use of family members only. 2. This guest apartment use may not be conveyed to any purchaser of the property. 3. The guest apartment may not be rented out.. 4. This ase is subject to City review at the end of four years. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (1). Planning Commission member Goetten voted nay. Goetten felt that the lot should have the area required in order to sustain the extra guest apartment use. MINUTE:r OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MI`ETING HKI.D MAY 20, 1985. PACE 18 1923 SCHOELI, & MADSON 565 LEAF STREET SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN RF:VIIF.W Larry Hanson, representative from Schoell & Madson, was present. Assistant 'honing Administrator Gaffron reviewed with the Planning Commission the applicant's proposal to subdivide a 5.9 acre parcel into 3 lots with an average lot size of 1.88 acres. Goetten noted that the City has never been in the position to approve substandard lots. Goetten noted that she would consider 2 lots but not 3. Larry Hanson noted that the existing building will be removed. Assistant Zoning Adninistrator Gaffron noted that the drainage easement area should not be included in the total dry buildable a -re Gaffron noted the total parcel of 5.9 acres minus the li ` I sf of drainage easement equals 5.65 acres of dry bui l(...)Ie. Larry Hanson noted that the "drainage" area is dry and buildable but does carry water at certain times. Kelley asked 4.f the builder could acquire more land for his proposal. Kelley noted a strip of land to the north and south. Larry Hanson stated that it is a consideration. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that Reverend Glen Chaffin, of the adjacent Church of Religious Science, talked with him and noted that the fences do not indicate the boundary lines. Taylor Explained that if there is 11,000 sf of wet area, and the applicant is already 4,20P sf short of 6 acres, there would be a total of 15,000 sf needed in order to provide for drainage easement and to assure at least 2.0 acres for each lot. Larry Hanson questioned the City's definition of drainage easement being unbuildable. Hanson noted that the actual channel is narrow. Chairman Callahan summarized Planning Commission's viewpoints. Callahan noted that unless the applicant can acquire 6 dry buildable acres that the commission will not approve of. 3 lots. Callahan informed the applicant that the Planninq Commission will only consider 2.0 acres per lot. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Sine moved, Goetten seconded, to formally approve the Planning Commission minutes of April 15, 1985. Mot ion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 20, 1985. PATE 19 REPRESENTATIVE TO ATTEND COUNCIL. MEETING Geot_ten volunteered to a.ttend the Council meeting of June 10, 1985. DISCUSSION OF INVITATION TO ADMIN!STRATOR Planning Conirission extended to invitation to City Administrator Bernhardson to attend the Planning Commission meeting of June 17, 1985. MARINA COMMITTEE APPOINTEES Planning Commission selected representatives Kelley and Sime to be appointed to the Marina Committee. DISCUSSION OF HAZARDOUS BUILDING Sime noted a haz,ird, us building just west of Fegers and asked staff to invf•stigato. ADJOURNMENT 11:45 PM Sime mcwed, Goetten seconded, to adourn the regular Planning Commission meeting at 11:45 p.m. Motion, Ayes (6), Nays W) . L IN '985 ill]] I—,;'; t . f I IL91 league of rninnesota cities -' May 31, 1985 TO: City C�l�er FROM: Joel .J5?'nmik,Legislative Counsel RE.: Notice of Stare Agency Openings The League has received notice from the state of several available positions in state agencies. Many of these agencies play very important roles. Application forms may be obtained at the Office of the Secretary of State, 180 State Office Building, St. Paul, MN 55155, (612) 296-2805. The deadline for applications is .June 11, 1985. The League strongly encourages interested city officials to submit their applications. Please pass this information on to your mayors and councilmembers. For further information, please contact me at the League. We would be happy to assist in any way possible. 1) MUNICIPAL BOARD has 1 vacancy open for a member. The board acts on all boundary adjustments between a city and the adjacent 13nd, and rules on incorporations. Members are appointed by the Governor. Members must file with EPB. Monthly meetings; members receive $50 per diem plus expenses. For specific information contact the Municipal Board, 165 Metro SquEre Bldg., St. Paul 5510); (612) 296-2428, 2) CHARITABLE. GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD has 3 vacancies open for members. The board shall regulate legal forms of gambling to prevent their commercialization, to ensure integrity of operations and to provide for the use of net profits only for lawful purposes. Members are appointed by the Governor. Must have been residents for at least 5 years, not more than six members may belong to the same political party. At least 4 members must reside outside of the seven county metropolitan area. Terms are staggered. Members receive $35 per diem plus expenses. Members must file with EPB. For specific information contact the Charitable Gambling Control Board, 900 Summit National Bank Bldg., 310 4th Ave. S., Minneapolis 55415; (612) 341-7676. 3) METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION has ? vacancies open immediately. Members must be a resident of the appropriate Metropolitan Airports Commission commissioner precinct. The t;rmmission promotes air transportation, international, national, state and local by developing (OVER) ILL it at A, rrunne!-,t,)t,a ` 51 C-) 1 (h 1 L?) 2;-'' % `_7buo the Twin Cities as an aviation center, coordinates with other aviation facilities in the state to provide economical and effective use of aeronautic facilities and services; may build new airports or acquire existing airports in the metropolitan area; adopts and enforces regulations to manage all. metropolitan airports; controls airport land use and provides for airport noise control. Members are appointed by the Governor; members must file with EPB. Monthly meetings; members receive $50 per diem. For specific information contact the Metropolitan Airports Commission, 6040 28th Ave. S., Minneapolis 55450; (612) 726-1892. 4) SMALL BUSINESS PROCUREMENT ADVISORY COUNCIL has 1 vacancy open for a member. The council advises the Commissioner of Administration on the small business procurement program, reviews complaints from vendors and reviews compliance reports. Members are appointed by the Governor. Members receive no compe„^ation. For specific information contact the Small Business Procurement Advisory Council, 112 Administration Bldg., St. Paul 55155; (612) 297-4412. JJJ:rmm (2iet ktA, ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT r� MESS KEY CONTROL NUMBEKIOCA) CONT AGENCY NCIC IDENT (LIAG) DATE/TIME REPORT MADE L NOR DATE REPORTED IRPD) TIME RPD (TRP) LOCATION GRID NOR (LGN) DAY: S M W T F S E/ �� 1 , /2. h/ / // PLACE COMMITTED (PLC) LL/ L NOR HRO SOL'AD OR BADGE # ISBN) TIME ASIG. (TAS) TIME ARR. ITAR) r1 _ TIME CLR. (TCL) Imo`/ OFFICER ASSIGNED ASSISTED BY Lj NOR ISN VOC (UC�S �/ /•,, T OFFfN&E ❑ OR INITIA.LCIOMPLAINT ❑ OTHER PRINCIPAL: %, COMPLAINT ❑OFFENDER 0 VICTIM❑ D.O.B. BUSINESS ADDRESS H OTHER REPORTS INCLUDrD Impound ❑ Prop Inventoiv ❑ Implled Consent ❑ Accident Report ❑ Teps ❑ Influence Report ❑ Photos r] REPORTING PERSONQOFFENDER❑VICTIM D.O.S. BUSINESS AUDIESS / HOME ADDRESS L oil SEE CASE FILE HRD Codes P — Phone R — Radio A — Alarm 1 — In Parsa V — Visual M — Ms+I T — Other N i m 00 4Jq 1smb W BUSINE'SS PHONE HOMEPHONE BUSINESS PHONE HOMEPHONE ROLL CALL Warn & Release I Dept. Assist i Message Deliver Treated & Transported Advised —'� Citation Issued Detail Completed COPY TO List CO ATTNY ❑ CITY AITNY ❑ COURT ❑ CHIEF ❑ OTIIER DISPOSITION. Unfoun Cleared by arrest Ref other agency Inactive Other 0F F IC " ' SUPERVISOR'S SIGNATURE LAKE MINNETONKACONSERVATION DISTRICT 473-7033 JUN CITY OF ORONO L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE June 1985 Saturday 6- 8-85 Lake Inspection Tour: Water Structures & Environment Committee and Lake Use Committee 7:30 a.m., Wayzata depot docks Saturday 6-22-85 Executive Committee 7:30 a.m., Park Bench Eatery, Spring Park Wednesday 6-26-85 Regular Meeting, Board of Directors 7:30 p.m., Tonka Bay Village Hall 4901 Manitou Road (County Road 19) 5-31-85 �C� May 31 �O` Metropolitan Council 1985 D �0 �-E. �� s 30U Metro Square Building 0 Seventh and Robert Streets i uI I ��; St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 i TO: Metropol i Uls J,' Telephone (612) 291 6359 A year ago we he d a series of meetings with local officials around the region to hear your concerns about the Metropolitan Council. This year I would like to once again meet with you to discuss the Council's priorities for 1986 and the impact that has on the budget. These regional meetings, which have been held since 1976, are also an excellent opportunity to hear any concerns you may have about Council -related issues. My plan is to hold one meeting for each county plus a separate meeting for the Cities of St. Paul and Minneapolis. We'll meet for a dutch treat breakfast at 7:30 a.m. The Hennepin County meeting will be on Tuesday, June 25 at the Kopper Kettle Restaurant, 225 Central Avenue in Osseo. During the year we were able to get the new Regional Transit Board, which was created by the 1984 Legislature, up and running. We've also made some inroads in redefining how the region manages its solid waste. Our program is currently in the Legislature and we'll have more information on that by the time we meet. For 1986 the Council has set six issues as priorities for 1986. These include: 1) An analysis of whether changes in funding have hurt the ability of local governments to deliver public services. 2) Enlarging the Council"s role as a regional data center. 3) Improving the region"s long-term care system for elderly and handicapped people. 4) Recovering resources from trash instead of burying it in landfills. 5) Improving the Council"s metropolitan commission "oversight". 6) Studying the region"s long-range needs for public transit. I look forward to seein you at the breakfast meetings and getting your reaction to these priorities. Please R.S.V.P. Rosemarie Johnson at 291-6391. We've also invited legislators and members of the regional commissions Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, Regional Transit Board and Metropolitan arks and Open Space Commission). S' cerely, Sandra S. Gar 6ring Chair cc: Clerks, City & County Administrators, School Superintendents & Board Chairs, City Council & Town Board Members All E4uil Qlgwrtunrt, Emplover ART CENTER OF MINNESOTA/2240 NORTHSHORE DRIVE, CKYSLA.L BAY, AIJNN,FSUJA_Si3.2.31(612) 473-7361 Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 May 24, 1985 City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RE: Art Center of Minnesota Sanitary Sewer Improvements Project No. 85-2 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: ry Q MAY ?8M L CITY OF ORONO The Art Center of Minnesota is writing you regarding the proposal which is on the Orono City Council agenda for Aonday, June 10, 1985. with regard to assessing the Art Center of Minnesota property for sanitary sewer improvements under the '11innesota special assessments law. Your proposal is to assess our property identified as 2240 North Shore Drive referred to as "Art Center of Minnesota Nest and our property at 2180 North Shore Drive referred to as "Art Center of Minnesota East". It is our understanding that this Project 85-2 is to be done in con- junction with your Crystal Bay sanitary sewer Project 85-1. We hearby inform you that it is our belief that a sanitary sewer improve- ment project is not necessary for our facility and we do not wish you to construct it. Further, we catagorically object to the assessment of our property for the sanitary sewer project in the amount of $97,300 or for any other amount. We understand that you have assigned ten "units" at a cost of $9,730 each in arriving at your total assess- ment for the Art Center of Minnesota properties of $97,300. The property which you propose to assess is described as the East 474 feet of the North 459 feet of Government Lot 5, Township 117, Range 23 West, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and is otherwise identified on your map attached hereto as "Art Center of Minnesota". To summarize, we object both to the construction of the easement and to your assessment of our land for it. Res eStfully submit d, Katherine V; . Harder President ART CENTER OF MINNESOTA Kii: sb _RF..PORT LAST YR. TO DATE APRIL '85 ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTH LY_ACTIVITY CITY OF ORONO THIS SAME MONTH THIS YR. IFFENSES MONTH LAST YEAR TO DATE ARRESTS 21 16 46 43 AA art 2 44 43 97 99 Adults 11 raffic 96 58 210 182 Juveniles 0---- art 3 16 11 40 67 Citations 170 part 4 35 42 109 12.7 _ Warninas 3_____ art 5 183 204 527 687 - _ -A TOTAL ORONO 395 374 1029 1205 CITY OF LONG LAKE _ art 1 8 5_ 17 15 art 22 17 38 43 Adults ?_ Itra_f _2 f i_c 39 6 68 36 Juveniles 0 1 Part 3 6 4 14 11 Citations 44 Part 4 16 12 39 38 Warninas 25 Part 5 47 35 139 124 J TOTAL LONG LAKE 138 79 315 267 1 CITY OF SPRING PARK --- Part 1 7 6 19 13 15 6 27 32 Adults 1 Part 2 _ —_ 4 4 23 27 Juveniles 0 Traffic 2 2 9 5 Citations 17 Part 3 10 6 19 45 Warnincs 2 Part 4 _ - 29 31 91 114 Part 5 _ TOTAL SPRING PARK 67 55 1 188 236 CITY OF MINNETONKA BEACH -- part 1 1 3 — 2 4 Part 2_ 2 1 _ _ 4 2 Adults 0 _ Traffic 3 4 10 12 Juveniles,_0 Part 3 0 1_ 1 2 Citations 6 14 WarniD-qc s 0_ Part 4 0 2 4 Part 5 _ 14 _ 10 43 41 TOTAL MTKA BEACH J 20 21 __ 6 4 75_— BRAND TOTALS 620 529 1596 1783 TOTAL ICR REPORTS TRAFFIC CITATIONS — NON_ HAZARD TAGS _237_— 30 TOTAL CONTACTS---- METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Suite 300 Metro Square Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612-291-6359 PRELIMINARY FORECASTS BY COMMUNITY FOR 1990 AND 2000 June 4, 198� INTRODUCTION The Metropolitan Council forecasts show continued gains in the number of people, jobs and households in the Twin Cities Area through 1990 and 2000. These preliminary forecasts are part of the update of the Metropolitan Development Framework, the Council's plan for orderly and economic change in the region. The plan refers specifically to growth in regional facilities that the Council oversees, such as sewers, transportation, parks and airports. Generally, the higher the forecast numbers, the greater the demand on regional facilities. The Council will use the forecasts to plan for expected demands on regional facilities and other services including health, aging and solid waste. Regional commissions use the forecasts to design and stage their projects. Local communities use them to guide planning for local growth and development. The Council projected the following increases for the region by 1990: 17 percent in households, 9 percent in population and 21 percent in employment. This is slightly above the population growth rate during the 1970s, but not as high as the rates of the 1950s and 1960s. The forecasted growth rate for households and employment is down slightly from growth in the 1970s. Growth is expected to continue from 1990 to 2000 at a slightly lower rate than forecasted for the 1980s. REGIONAL FORECASTS Population and employment forecasts* were done separately and then compared. The demographically based forecasts used the cohort survival method. Regional employment forecasts resulted from a regression analysis comparing local and national trends. The demographic method vielded population, household and labor force forecasts. The labor force and employment forecasts were compared to ensure compatability between them. fhe regional forecasts are shown below. Year Ho,,seholds Population Employment 1970 573,834 1,8/4,612 853,000 1980 721,444 1,985,873 1,075,000 1990 845,000 2,160,000 1,300,000 2000 910,000 2,260,000 1,400,000 FORECASTS FOR CITIES AND TOWNSHIPS Growth occurs throughout the region. In most instances, change can be under- stood by examining local trends. In the suburbs, it is easy to spot; whole subdivisions and new office buildings appear in a short time. Construction goes on in most communities during every economic recovery, even in some areas that have been stable for years. In a few areas, growth trends run counter to these economic cycles. Business expansion even occurs during recessions. In turn, that causes construction in some areas during periods of genera' decline. In the older, more developed areas, growth occurs in buildings left 'A description of these forecasting methods follow; the tables. by firms expanding to the suburbs or in buildings where other firms went out of business. Office buildings and apartments replace single-family housing. Industrial parks fill up and shopping centers try new marketing strategies and tenant mixes. The forecast for each area considers the dispersed nature of change, as well as regional and national trends. Each minor civil division (MCD) was independently forecasted. These MCD forecasts were totaled and compared to the regional forecasts. Individual community forecasts were adjusted so that the total of MC9"s would equal the regional forecast. This method reflects the regional forecasts, as well as changes in rural areas, developing suburbs, older suburbs and the central cities. The region exhibits two interesting housing characteristics. Housing activity has been about equal each year since 1970 on either side of a line drawn along Highway 12. If one divides the region approximately along Highway 65, the west side of the region has twice as mach housing construction annually as the east. The forecasts reflect these ratios. In each MCD, the procedure followed was to forecast households first, then population and finally employment. Close examination of recent trends helped determine each city's or township's forecast. For example, the household change was examined from the 1970 to the 1980 Census. Annual residential building permits furnished another indicator of change. The permits showed the types of housing units constructed each year between 1970 and 1984. Finally, growth limitations were examined; for example, additional land supply and Zoning restrictions. Information about these factors cdme from local plans and contacts with local planners. CONCLUSION The tables that follow show the preliminary forecasts. They may be revised after city officials and others examine them. Later this year, the forecasts will be adopted by the Council as part of the Metropolitan Development Framework. A more detailed discussion of the MCD household, population and employment forecast methodology follows the tables. HENNEPIN 1970 1980 1990 �00C► PRELIMINARY --------------------------------------- HOUSEHOLD FORECAST 5/29/85 61 uomi n9ton 18.4 '866U Z�50 ` J('►(:►0 Brooklyn Center 9151 10751 11500 115C►i► Nrook1yn Park 7 43 15268 --1►00 25000 Champlin 1291 -277.; 4000 5000 Corcoran 407 1247 16►>C► 1800 Crystal 8296 8977 9--C►0 9-Oo Dayton 691 1161 15i►C► 17c:►r► Deephaven 1062 122_ 1'cici 1300 Eden Prairie 1653 538' 1 1500 16000 Ed i . i a 1 = 005 17961 19500 1980! ExceIsior 900 1149 1400 1400 Fort Snelling 105 17 loci i00 Golden Valley 6534 7597 82C►ci 8400 Greenfield 252 �.J� 2 4U� � J 0U 50 JU( Greenwood 194 250 Z50 Hanover 28 64 eci 100 Hassan T -215 452 J5o 600 Hopkins 4667 7061 7600 8000 Independence 5'3 789 950 lo5o Long Lake 422 586 900 lo►:►►:► Loretto 88 109 14C► 156 Maple Grove 1503 62::9 11000 14000 Maple Plain 3-24 465 6oci 704:► MedicinE Late 157 16-- 175 175 Medina 582 765 900 1100 Minneapolis 161141 161858 166000 168000 Minnetonka 9088 12667 16500 113000 Minnetonka beach 181 187 «5 225 Mi nnetri str 7:�1 974 1150 1200 Mound 2:JJ 3384 3700 3700 New Hope 6019 7627 8500 8500 Orono 1976 2291 2600 2704 i Osseo 807 1015 1100 1100 P1ymoUth 4641j 10491 17000 Z10o0 Richfield 14801 15258 15800 16000 Robbinsdaln 529i► 5705 6000 6000 Rociford 47 125 170 200 Rogers 174 210 300 400 St Anthony 188.7 19vS 2000 2000 St BonifaCius 188 281 400 450 St LOUIS Fa-t 15781 17669 19500 20000 Shorewood 1 1 12 1 484 1650 1700 Spring Far 4513 684 750 730 Tcnk.a Bay 428 491j 700 700 Wayzata 126u 156(.1 1800 1900 Woodland 157 18'• 200 2W TOTAL 'i19713 76tS-4 41400=) 439000 HENNEP I N 1970 1960 1990 <<u:►U Population Forecasts 5/29/8J Bloomington ---------------------------------------- 81970 818:1 88000 85000 Brooklyn Center 35173 31230 30000 :0000 Brooklyn Farb: 26230 43332 57000 65000 Champlin 4704 9006 12400 150!►C► Corcoran 1656 4252 5100 56C►C► Crystal 30925 2554- 25000 24000 Dayton 2631 40C►0 5000 J OU Deephaven 3-85� 716 �600 3�c:�C► Eden Prairie 6938 1626Z� �2000 4 000 Edina 44046 4607-, 450C.)0 46000 Excelsior 2563 2523 2900 27(_)i) Fort Snelling 624 223 200 200 Golden Valley 24246 22775 22000 220U0 Greenfield 973 1391 1700 1606 Greenwood 587 6 5 Z 63C► 60u Hanover 96 248 290 350 Hassan T 917 1766 2000 21(-)0 Hopkins 13428 157,36 14400 14800 Independence 199,:; 264i► 2900 3200 Long Lake 1506 1747 200 2500 Loretto 340 297 40 350 Maple Grove 6275 2UJ25 35000 4700o Maple Plain 1 169 1421 1700 19c_►0 Medicine Lake 446 419 440 420 Medina 2_96 2627- 2900 400 Minneapolis 434400 370951 349000 3360C►0 Minnetonka 35776 ;868--• 4700i► 49000 Minnetonka Beach 586 575 610 590 Minnetrista 25378 '2:7,6 -500 3,500 Mound 7572 9280 97-00 890U New Hope 23180 2'087 24000 27Oi►C► Orono 6787 6645 7000 7000 Osseo 2908 2974 �100 2900 Plymouth 18077 1615 48000 57060 Richfield 4727-1 77851 :7000 :7000 Robbinsdale 16845 14422 14200 14206 Roc 1. f or d 166 = E30 490 560 Rogers 544 652 900 1160 St Anthony 6886 5619 4600 46110 St Bonifaci-is 685 857 1100 120(:) St Louis Fark 486B::� 429, 1 42000 4700i► Shorewood 4223 4646 48UC► 48(?0 Spring Fart. 1087 1465 1500 1400 Tonka Bay 1'97 1'54 1800 1800 Wayzata 3700 _.b21 3900 ::900 Woodland 544 5 2 b 540 520 TOTAL 960040 941 4C1' 99700(.,) 102400) 10 HENNEP I N 1970 1980 199C► 2C►C►C► PRELIMINARY EMPLOYMENT FORECAST 4/17/85 Bloomington ---------------------------------------- 43955 59000 750C►(j 9000u Brooklyn Center 8064 10600 14000 14000 Brooklyn Farb:: 2810 7200 15000 21O0C► Champlin 345 440 74i0 1 U0� j Corcoran 35 �30 200 20!i Crystal 5623 6000 6500 6504► Dayton SO 100 200 3C►0 Deephaven 275 160 700 300 Eden Prairie 33C►6 12200 29000 72000 Edina 2-2060 41000 52000 54000 Excelsior 1::00 7000 3000 000 Fort Snelling 14888 20000 24000 24000 Golden Valley 18985 300OC► 3::000 :13000 Greenfield 5 50 lUU lOC► Greenwood 35 100 100 1UC► Hanover 4 50 50 Hassan T 4 10C► 500 500 Hopkins 16091 19100 21000 2100o Independence 30 100 100 100 Long Lake 1213 191►C1 2000 2000 Loretto 75 160 25G 250 Maple Grove 759 170fj 4000 6000 Maple Plain 500 180(') 2000 2000 Medicine Lake 36 50 50 50 Medina 394 1100 1200 1200 Minneapolis 290324 2840(')0 295000 1298000 Minnetonka 5736 18(.,)00 32000 Minnetonka beach 145 210 1)00 aJ Minnetrista 10 50 100 151) Mound 2725 A2600 2200 2700 New Hope 4415 9400 10000 10000 Orono F,5i► 470 600 600 Osseo 1738 47,00 4500 4500 Plymouth 6587 20000 34000 45000 Richfield lo328 14100 14500 14500 Robbinsdale 4416 3200 5000 5000 Roc1ford 147, 160 256 250 Rogers 175 730 1000 1200 St Anthony 1999 1800 2500 2500 St Eonifacius 1�u 260 300 300 St Lou t S F ar E :0788 35000 3800o '8000 Shorewood 5C►9 520 550 550 Spring Far 1 1 5C►li 1 100 1500 1500 Tonka bay 30 50 50 50 Way:ata 5o 5400 5504) 5500 Woodland 4 50 50 50 TOTAL_ SOt,4_`4 61 732C►00 780000 15 APPENDIX REGIONA!. POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD FORECASTS The regional population forecast was prepared using the cohort survival model. It is a widely used, relatively simple way of applying assumptions to project future population change for different age groups. The 1980 Census population and age distribution by sex provided the basis of these regional forecasts. Each cohort (group of people the same age) is advanced or aged one year at a time until the desired forecast year is reached. The number of people still in the age group each year is equal to the number that survived, minus the number that moved out of the region, plus the number that moved in. Each year's births are calculated by multiplying the number of women in each age group by the percentage likely to have a child that year. The forecast uses assumptions about the number of people that will survive, the fertility rate and migration. Future survival rates were assumed to stay the same as in 1980, except for the future elderly; they are projected to live longer. Recent evidence shows less peopie are dying from heart disease. The fertility rates were held at the 1980 level. A few more people moved out of the region than into it during the last decade --a reversal of the trend of the previous two decades. The migration assumptions resulted in a slight future net migration loss. It was assumed that both in- and out -migration would droa slightly over the period from 1980 to 2000. Less people are expected to be in the age ranges that have the highest mobility. Households were forecasted using assumptions regarding the rate at which people of different ages form households. It was assumed that these rates would remain the same (by age) as they were in 1980. To determine the number of households for a future year, the household formation rates were multiplied by the forecasted population by age. The household forecasts reflect the historically high household formation rates of 1980, bUt do not further increase the rates for 1990 and 2000. In light of the sharp drop in household formation rates durinq the recent recession, this spems appropriate. The employment forecasts are consistent with the labor force expected in 1990 and 2000, even though employment was not derived from the demographic forecasts. REGIONAL EMPLOYMENT FORECASTS Employment for 1990 and 2000 was calculated from regression equations. The Equations were derived from analysis of a special series of total nonagri- cuitural employment for the seven -county area and United States total nonagri- cultural employment from 1958 to 1983. Two equations were used for each category, such as manufacturing, services and retail. One equation made local employment a function of national employment. To obtain 1990 figures, a Bureau of Labor Statistics forecast of national employment was simply substituted into the equation. The other equation was a trend line. The 2000 forecasts are a continuation of the trend from 1958 to 1983. MCD HOUSEHOLD FORECASTS The primary data for the MCO household forecasts were the 1970 and 1980 Censuses, annual residential building permits and the amount of developable land left in a city. (A household is an occupied housing unit either a single-family home or a single apartment unit.) For example, if the census showed a change of 500 households from 1970 to 1980, the first approximation of a city"s trend was 50 households per year. Examination of the permits indicated important aspects of change in a community. It showed if a community followed national growth cycles and to what degree the community's overall trend was influenced by a few large project;. Over the last 10 or 15 years, a number of cities had only one large apartment project. Some of these projects had hundreds of units, enough to significantly affect the annual average. That is, the overall trend was too high. These communities actually had single- family housing activity with one large project. In these cases, the initial forecasts used the single-family trend. If there was not enough land available in a city to accommodate continuation of the trend, the city was assumed to stop growing during the forecast period. Finally, all city and township forecasts were adjusted to total to the regional household forecasts. MCD POPULATION FORECASTS This work had much the same form as the household forecast, but used additional data. Census data, school enrollment by grade and building permits helped project the number of people living in a household. The age distribution and number of students in the higher grades indicate the potential number of people that could leave the area to go to work, to further training or to college. The types of housing built in an area change the number of people per unit. Apartments have a much smaller number of people per unit than single-family houses. T' .,recanted persons per household ratio multiplied by the expected number of olds yielded the population forecasts. Once again, the MCDs were added I. djusted to meet the regional population forecast. MCD EMPLOYMENT FORECASTS "Employment" is the number of people that work within a community, whether they live there or not. This differs from census data, which counts "employed" people where they live rather than where they work. MCD employment in 1970 came from a Minnesota Department of Transportation data set done for transportation modelling. More recent employment data came trom a special tabulation of covered employment by city. This source is divided by industry and is available from 1977 to 1983 Covered employment includes all working people that are covered by the Un--;,'oyment Compensation Insurance Program. The program is administered by th- ;,,partment of Economic ",pr—ity. They prepared the data for this region. The initial trend was calculated from i970 to 1983 using _d employment. Just as in the household forecasts, the structure of employment was examined to determine factors that would affect the trend. In addition, commercial and industrial building permit data helped determine if recent development activity reflected local service and retail needs, or was regional in nature. Local service and retail activities include fast food drive-ins, grocery stores, dentist offices and small banks. Regional activities are speciality shopping centers, warehouses, multi -tenant office buildings and corporate headquarters. The forecasts reflected other factors such as land supply shortages, zoning restrictions and planned projects. The individual MCD forecasts were summed and compared to regional forecasted employment and adjusted as necessary. 5.29.85 VW529A,ARCHIV ART CENTER OF MINNESOTA/2240 NOKTHSHOkE DRIVE, CkYSLAI-13AI',ZUNNISU7a-55.3231(612) 473-7361 Wayzata, Minnesota SS391 May 24, 1985 Cite of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RE: Art Center of Minnesota Sanitary Sewer Improvements Project No. 85-2 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: NAY ? 8 1985 TY OF ORONO The Art Center of :linnesota is writing you regarding the proposal which is on the Orono City Council agenda for :Monday, June 10, 1985. with regard to assessinv the art Center of Minnesota nropert;' for sanitary sewer improvements under the ;Minnesota spe -al ^--sess-ents law. Your proposal is to assess our property iJe:.tif,ed as 2240 North Shore Drive referred to as "Art Center of �Iinnescta Best and our property at 2180 North Shore Driv^ referred tc. as It ',.enter of Minnesota East". It is our Understanding that this project 85-2 is to be dot in cc:, - junction with your Crystal Bay sanitary sewer Project 85-1. We hearby inform you that it is our belief that a sanitary Ye c. improve- ment project is not necessary fcr our facility and xe do -iot -1sh you to construct it. FurtLer, we catagorically object to thy^ lssessment of our property for the sanitary sewer project in the amount of $97,300 or for any other amount. We understand that you have assigned ten "units" at a eon-, of $9,730 each in arriving at your total assess- ment for the Art Center of Minnesota pr nerties of $97,300. The property whi-a you propose to assess is described as the East 474 feet of the North 4S9 feet of Government Lot 5, Township 117, Range 23 West, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and is otherwise identified on ycur map attached hereto as "Art Center of Minnesota". To suMmarize, we object both to the construction of the easement and to your assessment of our land for it. Respe5tfully submit Id, Katherine V'. Harder President ART UNTER OF 111KNESOTA KII : st, #0- 10 i 1 0sScale0 \4NGVD-1929) fDate1985o rDatumevel)hour Certificate of Survey for James L. Hoff in Lots 7 & 8, GUST S. JOHNSON'S ADDITION Hennepin County, Minnesota i l APR 19 196 ►J CITY OF ORONO it _1 `4, OF ORONO l_ �\ '3 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the Southerly half of Lot 7* and all of Lot 8,°GUST S. JGHNSON'S ADDITION', and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. *For purposes of this survey, the North line of the South half of Lot7 has been assumed to be a straight line drawn from the midpoint of the Southwesterly line of said Lot 7 through the midpoint of the dashed traverse line near the Northeasterly line of said Lot 7 (as said dashed line is shown on the record plat), said North line of the South half being extended to the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka. COFFIN & GRONBERG, .INC. ,r -Mark ron rg eg o. 2955 Gordon R. Coffin Reg. No. 6064 Engineers and Land Surveyors Long Lake, Minnesota Phone 473-4141 N o® scat 1N raaT ale' 0 4 dr 0 73' o° ,o 4 E4G se Try Tract 0 ae< 250. TS- Y 251 SO- P _ \ 1 mo 65,07 6.e0 3 ee• 12'e 1`E � ,MOST EASTERLY CORRER OF TRACT 6 PART OF T IAGT A \ ITLE N0. 527162 LAKE MINNETONKA o� y �W, )••f•s CARMANS BAY >a�°. ra as 'qd` It iv \ � i o /• F \\ \ \ \� aye)/ � \ ` .�\ � \ c 0 0, \\ R. L. . °\d \ \O 4 ju e \ It r. �'h << • dr 49 .�� �._ .\ \(j \ < )� ti i 1 `C 0. • �r a[ -�Io� ,a<J. e 0 r r _ J < °• •t \+ \ \,� • Tract MOST EASTa1LY i 4 • `�\o q4) \\ \ \\ \�N \ r,A CORNER ' : 0 Tract` E /�.•lt :~o• ze.• •r -I `.I ,A rat ��^. r° r• � �.,r I •. , / A •O O r: V� JI / ♦ / s aep41 j 6• �sr yea a / m/ / f 4 Sim- la roe . r /, J /00 d G LEGEND fee° �f IrOn bnuxen lOYnd 1` IRON PIPE, UNLESS NOTED. o Or Oki I• Iron Pipe Set With Cap St.mpad RLS117... p1(DI ilrred Distinct 1. Plat ON RECORDED DESCRIPTION M! Denotes •nA A SPOT ELEVATION • 4a•r 2 FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL O 10 9. ey a. M / / trim CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: RICHARD C. KAUFFMANN LEGAL DESCRIPTION The brthurterly 100 f"I of Tract Aet<•yt that na"t tNereo+ ir1M brthrste'I, oI , lime descrihed as ,.I losn: Epinn rag at the most Easterly corner of Tract E; thence brtheaskrly along a line Which 1 caEAkdr f extended mould intersect the most arly coeOf Tract S. to A Point mo distant IS fast Sthmoeast from Said st Easterly corer of Tract e; the"le deflecting right to A point on the ftrtheaekrlY It" of mid Tract A distant S feet Sultheaskrly frem said most Euterly rarer of Tract 6 andlP.I '. Mos well ' RRaagishe�tnLand Surrey b. 116. files of at Be .stared land as Is erlancW by certificate of Title 16. 527160. Tract S, wkpt that part thereof 17 in0 Rudm: sh eskrly of 6 11. doteed n "lloos: 6eglnefnp mt the most FAsterly Carer of Tract E; thento brth ....... a onp A ilne Alch if extended weelA Intersect the most Easterly corner of mid Tract B. to a Point distant IS feet Southwesterly from said ld most Easterly corner o1 Tract S: th— dm/tastlmg right te A Point on the brtheasterty lie of Tract A dtttut S feet Sootheaskrly from said most Easterly corner o! tract S. and amid line there andfy, Registered LAW Surrey b. 115. Films of Registrar of Titles. County of Hennepin. Being registered land as is r,ldenced by tartittcets of Title b. 4271e1, Said tracts contain 29,500 sRwra !•et, on or lest. Ar moawrad to the ester's cage. SVEJert to ea seems. re—AtlOns or restrictions of —.it. if anY 116 +s au n •. n .e xin: x n••sn Y. a x fe We .)",I In CCI .,. -. A• wa near r. •. rA � �rmn, ors' ' 'MERILA & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS. SITE PLANNERS r2i6 exam A,•, K • E 68 • 6rsamlr• Perm. YYae— M o m•rm•^•• left) SST-TS¢T , 84 - roi #016 r O 236. i `s yo y 507 i 0 D D O So i Lot. Areas Lot 1 = 1.30 ± Acres Lot 2 = 1.05 ± Acres New South Parcel = 1.30 ± Acres New North Parcel = 1.05 ± Acres Existing Legal Descriptions: I. Lot 1, Block 1 Partenwood Owner: Bruce W. c'ngelsma 990 Partenwood Road Long Lake, MN 55356 2. Lot 2, Block 1, Partenwood Owner: Gary W. Krimmel 960 Partenwood Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Date : 4-5-85 Scale: i" = 50' o : iron marker E—t L- PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR GARY KRI14MEL & BRUCE ENGELS14A IN LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 1, PARTENWOOD ORONO, MINNESOTA °b c L7 0 ' Jo a � J N VO.05 ZI J ?' a �. rj S G f-1 MA4WELL VAY ' J 1 \� LAKE MINNETONKP. 1 \ 1 \ A� \ �1 1T1 \ \ 1 \ \ 1 AS �s� \ 6 E>st \ Exift q �K<wr.el Vd �D �ividin9 Line. 3�00 N 8gI50.34�W ` Z O N ;7 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of Lots I and 2, Block 1, PARTENWOOD, according to the recorded plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, and the location of the houses and driveways thereon. It does not purport to show other improvements or encroachments. COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. Mark S. Gronberg Reg. No. 12755 Gordon R. Coffin Reg. No. 6064 Engineers & Land Surveyors Long Lake, Minnesota SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL Project No- 85-1 Project Name Crystal Bay Sanitary Sever Date - May 10 1985 Resolution No. Resolution Date April 22, 1985 Municipal Code No. 429 Levy No. Interest Rate 11% Prepared By Glenn R. Cook - Shut 1 M P.LO. No. Plat Parcel Lot Block Addition Area Feef Unite Age. Rote Total Age. Name Address Miscellaneous 16-117-23-31-0001 41310 3480 --- --- --- 1 $9,430 $9,430 George F. Rovegno 2010 Shoreline Dr. 10-117-23-31-0002 41310 3470 --- --- --- 1 $ 9,430 $.9,430 John T. Spence 2040 No. Shore Dr 10-117-23-31-0003 41310 3495 --- --- --- 1 $ 9,430 $9,430 Lyle G. Godfrey 2060 No. Shore Dr, 10-117-23-31-0004 41310 3490 --- --- --- 1 $ 9,430 $ 9,430 Carol A. LaQuey 2080 No. Shore Dr 10-111-23-31-0005 41310 3425 --- --- --- 1 $ 9,430 ;9,430 Olsi Hanson 1390 Railroad Ave 10-117-23-31-0006 41310 3600 --- --- --- 1 1 $ 9,430 $.9,430 P. J. Golden 1380 Railroa3 Ave 10-117-23-31-0007 41310 3485 --- --- --- 1 $ 9,430 $9,430 Reerett V. Miller 1360 Railroad Ave 10-117-23-31-0009 41310 3420 --- --- --- 1 $ 9,430 $9,430 Helen Bowers 2055 Spates Ave. 10-117-23-31-0013 41310 4020 --- --- --- 1 $9,431) $9,430 Godfrey F.Berquis 2140 Prospect An 10-117-2 31-OO16 41310 460C --- --- --- 1 $ 9,430 $.9,430 Irene Wo tcke 2150 Prospect Av.l 0-117-23-31-OO17 41310 4310 --- --- --- • L $ 9,430 $9,430 PatriciaYD Drunmond 2160 Prospect Av. 10-117-23-31-0018 41310 4320 --- --- --- 1 $9,430 $9,430 Bobby D. Johnson 2170 Prospect Av.' 10-117-23-31-0019 41310 3200 --- --- --_ 1 $ 9,430 $9,430 Fredrick W. Curtis 2180 Prospect Av. 10-117-23-31-0022 42140 0200 -�- --- --- 1 $ 9,430 $ 9,430 l W Cre�hrletienaon 1251 Brown Rd. 10-117-23-31-0028 42140 1650 7 & 8 1 Crystal Bay Mtka. 1 $ 9,430 $ 9,430 Robert J. Carlson 1290 Arbor St, 10-117-23-31-0029 42140 1900 9 6: 10 1 rystal Bay Mtlu, 1 $9,430 $ 9,430 Home Trade I e 1270 Arbor St. 10-117-23-31-0031 42140 2400 11 6 12 1 Crystal Bay Mtka. 1 $ 9,430 $9,430 Cary F. Farley 1250 Arbor St. 1� U 10-117-23-31-0032 42140 2700 1 6 2 2 Crystal Bay Mtka. 1 $9,430 $9,430 F. P. Peterson 11271 1261 Arbor St. 10-117-23-31-0033 42140 3100 3 6 4 2 Crystal Bey Mtka. 1 $9,430 $9,430 1Swanson Maribeth A. Arbor St, 10-117-23-31-0034 42140 3500 4 6 5 2 rystal Bay Mtka, 1 $9,430 $9,430 Jay Wood 1285 Arbor St. - J 10-117-23-31-0035 ..,.-- 42140 3900 5 6 6 2 r stsl Be Mtka. Y Y 1 $ 9, 430 $ 9, 430 Mrs, Albert P. Hoppe 1295 Arbor St. .f ,wu.-e owner as Boyce Sprague - 1DZZ E. Gardner St., Wayzata 55391 - Drurmmond is occupant with contract for deed. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL Project No. 85-1 Resolution No. Interest Rate 11% Project Name crystal Bay sanitary sewer Date May 10. 1985 Resolution Date April 22, 1985 Municipal Code No. 429 Prepared By Glenn R. Cook Levy No. Shoat s _ of P.I.D. No. Plot Parcel Lot Dlock' Addltloe Area Feet Units Ass. Rate Total Aso. None Address taecellaneous 10-117-23-31-0036 42140 4300 7 a B 2 Crystal Bay Mtka. l $9.430 $9,430 !'rrcus J. 6 Judy A. Blue MO Crystal Av. - 10-117-23-31-0037 42140 4600 9 2 Crystal Bay Mtka. 1 $9,430 $9.430 Fa a M. Rrtreft 1290 Brier St. 10-117-23-31-0038 42140 4800 10 2 Crystal Bay Mtka. 1 $9.430 $9,430 Dianne J.Mattlla 1270 Brier St. 10-11i-23-31-0039 42140 5100 1 11 6 12 2 Crystal Bay Mtka. 1 1 $9,430 $9,430 Jens* D. Stowe 1250 Briar St. 10-117-23-31-0040 42140 5400 1 & 2 3 Crystal Bay Mtka. 1 $9,430 $9,430 Adeline Quest 1251 Briar St. 10-117-23-31-0042 42140 5900 2 6 3 3 Crystal Bay Mtka. 1 $9,430 $9,430 Gary M. Printup 1261 Brier St. Mrs. Boor)) 10-117-23-31-0043 42140 6500 4,5,6 3 Crystal Bay Mtka. 1 $9,430 $9,430 H. Rhite 1291 Briar St. tO-117-23-31-0044 42140 7D01 6, 7 3 Crystal Bay Mtka. 1 $9,430 $9,430. Alexander 6 Dianne Jentiluce 1295 Brier St. Jeffrey B. 10-117-23-31-0048 42520 2010 4 1 JMrkvill. 1 $9,430 $9.430 Anderson 1375 Brown Rd.So 10-117-23-31-0049 42520 2020 4 1 KarkVille 1 $9,430 $9,430 George Platter 1380 Arbor St. 10-117-23-31-0050 42520 2500 5 1 Morkville 1 $9,430 $9,430 Philip Kaley 1395 Brown Rd.S. 10-117-23-31-0051 42520 3000 1 2 Morkville 1 $9,430 $9,430 9milio Garcia 1335 Arbor St. 10-117-23-31-0052 42520 3500 1 2 2 Markville 1 $9,430 $9,430 Ronald Anderson 1355 Arbor St. 10-117-23-31-0053 42520 4100 3 6 4 2 Markvllle 1 $9,430 $9,430 Mabel M. Belt 1380 Briar St. Elizabeth C. 10-117-23-31-0054 42520 4500 3 2 Merkville 1 $9,430 $9,430 Johnson 1365 Arbor St. Enrique �b 10-117-23-31-0055 42520 5500 4 2 Markville 1 $9,430 $9,430 Libetique 1385 Arbor St. '`�i0-117-23-31-0056 42520 6300 5 6 6 2 ILrkvilla 1 $9,430 $ 9,470 11s I. EDotieenkramer 2140 N. Shore Dr. 1 Herbert A. - C 10-117-23-31-0057 42520 7100 1 3 Markv Llle 1 $9,430 $9,430 Shepherd 1335 Briar St. 10-117-23-31-0058 42520 7300 1 3 Markville 1 $9,430 $9,430 Brian L. Gamon 2195 Prospect J Maxwell Add to L 10-117-23-31-0064 42540 O100 1 1 Crystal Bay 1 $9,430 $9,430 Wayne A. Quest 1205 Brown Rd.So. S 10-117-23-71-0065 42540 0250 2 6 3 1 1 Maxwell Add to Crystal Bay 1 29,430 $9,430 Curtis Quady 1223 Brown Rd So. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL Project No. 85-1 _ Project Name Crystal Bay Sanitary Sever Data may 10, 1985 Resolution No. Resolution Date April 22, 1985 Municipal Code No. 429 Levy two. _ Interest Rate 11.0% Prepared By Glenn R. Cook Sheet 7 ,, of 4 P.I.D. No. Plat Parcel Lot Block Addition Area Feet Units Ass. Rate Total Ass. Name Address kesceeaneous 10-I17-23-31-0066 42540 0450 4 4 5 1 Maxwell's Add to Crystal Bay 1 $ 9,430 $ 9,430 Richard C.Johoson 1241 Brown Rd.So. Maxwell's Add to Candsce S.M. P.O. Box 3765 10-117-23-31- 42540 0600 6 4 7 1 Crystal Bay 1 $ 9,430 9 9,430. Allen Aspen, CO 81611 Maxwell's Add to 10-117-23-31-0069 42540 0850 8 4 9 1 Crystal Bay 1 $.9.430 $ 9,430 Robert R. Braun 1230 Arbor St. Maxwell's Add to 10-117-23-31-0070 42540 2720 9 4 10 2 Crystal Bay 1 $ 9,430 $ 9,430 C. H. Sandgren 1215 Arbor St. Maxwell's Add to Elvon 4 10-117-23-31-0071 42540 2975 l0 4 11 2 Crystal Bay 1 $ 9,430 $ 9,430 Terry Yager 1223 Arbor St. 12 6 13 Maxwell's Add to ' 7 10-117-23-31-SS73y 42540 3255 14 4 15 2 Crystal Bay 1 $ 9,430 S 9,430 Karen E.Bjerkeng 1245 Arbor St. Maxwell's Add to 10-117-23-31-0074 42540 3290 16 4 17 2 Crystal Bay 1 $ 9,430 $ 9.430 Maybell Kohls 1224 Briar St. Moxwell's Add to 10-117-23-31-0075 42540 4030 17 4 18 2 Crystal Bay 1 $ 9,430 $ 9,430 Richard T.Kimen 1212 Briar St. 10-117-23-31-0089 42780 3000 15 1 Ora Park 1 $ 9,430 $.9,430 Daniel Crest 1990 Spates Ave. Richard 10-117-23-31-0090 42780 3225 16 - 19 1 Or& Park 1 $ 9,430 $ 9,430 V. Stinson 2040 Spates Ave. Monterey on Michael P. 10-117-23-31-0093 42640 1010 1 4 - 6 8 Minnetonka 1 $ 9,430 $. 9,430 McClelland 2170 Mtka. Ave. 10-117-23-31-0095 42780 -- 1-5 4 21 1 Ore Park 1 $-9,430 $ 9,430 Terry D. Morse 2080 Spates Ave. ' ^10-117-23-31-0096 42780 -- -13 4 2 1 Or. Park 1 S 9,430 $ 9,430 Harriet Sp Tore ngeou 2060 Spates Ave. Randolph T. 10-117-23-24-0003 41310 8200 --- --- --- 1 $-9,430 $ 9,430 Lukanen 1085 S.Brown Rd. Able J. 10-117-23-24-0004 41310 2802 --- --- --- 1 $�� 9,430 $ 9,430 Christenson 1105 Brown Rd .S. l 10-117-23-24-0005 41310 2870 --- --- --- 1 $ 9,430 $ 9,430 Kevin J. Derry 1115 Brown Rd. S. Duane A. 4 (,) d0-117-23-24-0006 41310 2874 --- --- --- 1 $ 9.430 $ 9,430 Nancy Clew 1135 Brown Rd. S. �T 10-117-23-24-0007 41310 2858 --- --- --- 1 $ 9,430 $ 9,430 L.J. Symoniak 1155 Brown Rd. S. L � 10-117-23-24-0008 41310 2855 --- --- --- 1 $. 9,430 $ 9,430 David Liesch 1140 S. Willow Dr. J Shirley 4 LeDeen 6 10-117-23-24-0009 41310 2620 --- --- --- 1 $ 9,430 $ 9,430 McWilliams 1130 S..Willow Dr. e S S 10-117-23-24-0010 41310 2630 --- --- 1 $ 9,430 $ 9,430 Vera C. McWilliams 1121) S. Willow Dr. C l% SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL Project No. _ Resolution No. Interest Rate - Project Name Crystal Bay Sanitary Saw er Date may 10, 1985 Resolution Oats April 22, 1985 Wrdclpal Code No. 429 Levy No. Prepared By Glenn R. Cook Shoot 4 _ of 4 P.I.D. No. Plat Parcel Lot Bock Addition Area Feet Unite As*. Pate Total Ara*. Name Address I Mlscollanocus 10-117-23-24-0011 41310 2612 --- --- --- 1 $ 9,430 $ 9,430 Harold & It= Freund 1110 Willow Dr.S. 10-117-23-24-0016 41310 5167 --- --- --- 1 $ 9,430 $ 9,430 Warren P. Kelly 1099 Willow Dr.S. 10-117-23-24-0017 41310 5170 --- --- --- 1 $ 9.430 $ 9,43C Nary Ann Olson 1115 Willow Dr.S. 10-117-23-24-0018 41310 5140 --- ------ 1 $ 9,430 $ 9,430 Oliver Engstrom 1145 Willow Dr.S. Douglas 6 10-117-23-24-0019 41310 5165 --- --- --- 1 $ 9.430 $ 9,430 Nora Sehnoor 1220 Lakeview Av. 10-117-23-24-0020 41310 5175 --- --- --- 1 $ 9,430 $-9,430 Dennis W.Fischer 1165 Brown Rd. S. Maxwell's Add to 10-117-23-24-00 42540 1250 12 6 13 1 Crystal Bay 1 $_9,430 $ 9,430 Al L. Hopwood 1205 Lakeview Av. Maxwell s Add to 10-117-23-24-0022 42540 1500 10 6 11 1 Crystal Bay 1 $ 9,430 $ 9,430 Betty J. Flam 1212 Arbor St. � Maxwell's Add to 10-117-23-24-0023 42540 1510 14-16 i Crystal Bay 1 $ 9,430 $ 9,430 Virgil H. Rolling 1225 Lakeview Av Me-ell's Add to 10-117-23-24-0024 42540 1725 17 6 18 1 Crystal Bay 1 $ 9,430 $ 9,430 Roger M. Zeeb 1245 Lakeview Av. Mexwell's Add to 10-117-23-24-0030 42540 5555 1-15 3 Crystal Bay 1 $. 9,430 $ 9,430 John Story 1233 Briar Ave. 1-8 Maxwell's Add to Stephen 6 10-117-23-24-0031 42540 -. 14-28 2 Crystal Bay 1 $-9,430 $ 9,430 Rsndl Carlson 1205 Arbor St. 10-117-23-42-0012 42780 4410 22 6 23 1 ra park 2 $ 9,430 $18,860 E.Robie Wayne 1950 Shoreline Dr 1955 Shoreline Or � 10-117-23-42-0014 42780 5100 --- -- rs Park 2 $ 9,430 $18,860 Sailors 'World 10-117-23-42-0021 00499 -- 1 1 Tourangeau Add. 1 $ 9,430 $.9,430 Daniel Crear 1980 Spates Ave. 10-117-23-42-0022 00499 -- 2 1 Tourangeau Add. 1 9 $ 9,430 $ 9,430 $ 9,430 $84,810 Tonka Transmisslo Craig Olson Art Center of Minnesota 1960 Shoreline Dr' <2240 Nn. Shore Dr. b1 d 10-117-23-32-0001 5210 10-117-23-32-pppp 59 2 thru 6 3 Me rkv ills 1 $ 9,430 $ 9,430 ArtCenter of 2240 No. Shore Dr thru 0063 Minnesots J 5 city G S S G 96 Total Unite I �% * Tax Records indicate owner as Kemna 6 Suess. t '.a... � .. ...ate.: "r, .. '•Iqy. F v,:, 1 r.0 .gyp •' . ' K.. J MEDINA-ORONO-LONG LAKE SANITARY. SEWER AGREEMENT EXHIBIT b v� r x r eu,1a WE for a+S A,*-'UOL sirlw, AWe 1i L ASCHMtN ASSOCIATES INC , Iti�6S