Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketDate Application Received: 01/23/13 Date Application Considered as Complete: 02/06/13 120-Day Review Period Expires : 04/07 /13 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: ;A A/ ,, Administrator Ap Name: Melanie Curtis f V V _,, .... _,. Title: Planning & Zoning Coordinator Item Description : Date: 4 March 2013 Item No . Agenda Section: #13-3591, Ervin Wachman, Outlot C, Bayview Farms 2nd Addition PID 06-117-23-22-0018 {also Outlots B & D PIDs 06-117-23-22-0012 & 06-117-23-22-0014) Preliminary Plat of Bayside Meadows -Resolution Zoning District: Existing Lot Areas: RR-1B One Family Rural Residential District (2 acre/200' width) 13.01± acres dry List of Exhibits: Exhibit A. Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Exhibit D. Exhibit E. Exhibit F. Exhibit G. Ex hibit H. + 0.71 + acres wetland 13. 72± acres total Draft Preliminary Plat Resolution Preliminary Plat Survey Revised Plans Invasive Species Management Plan City Engineer Comments 03/06/13 PC Report 02/11/13 PC Action Notice 02/25/13 Draft PC Minutes 02/19/13 Application Summary: Ervin Wachman requests preliminary plat approval to create five new, 2+ acre buildable lots and a private road from the original 13± acres. 1. Lot 1 is proposed to co ntain 3 .74 acres total; 3.05 acres dry, buildable and 0 .69 acres wetland . 2. Lot 2 is proposed to contain 2.26 acre s total; 2.25 acres dry, buildable and 393 square f eet {0 .009 acre) of wetland. 3. Lot 3 is proposed to contain 2 .34 acre s total dry, buildable area. 4. Lot 4 is proposed to contain 2.16 acre s total; 2.02 acre s dry, build able and 0.14 acre storm pond. 5 . Lot 5 is proposed to contain 2.06 acres total; 2.01 acres dry, buildable and 0 .05 acre storm pond . All of the lots would be served by a new private road with cul -de-s ac extending southerly from Bay side Road (CSAH 84). All lots would be served by private septic system s and private well s. Please refer to the Planning Commission staff memo attached as Exhibit F for a full detail of the proposed plat. Planning Commission Recommendation On February 19, 2013 the Planning Commission voted 5 to Oto recommend approval of the preliminary plat contingent upon consulting City Engineer approval of the revised plans, consistent with the staff recommendations and with the following conditions: 1. Revi se the landscape plan to include additional, similar native trees to be planted along the entire southern property boundary showing a tree preservation easement. This has been completed. 2. Revise the landscape plan to reflect removal of invasive species as identified within the KES conservation design report. This has been done. #13-3591 4 March 2013 Page 2 of 2 3. Address on-going maintenance and removal of invasive species within the HOA documents. This has been addressed. 4. Only the variance for the cul-de-sac length was acceptable. All other code requirements must be met with revised plans. 5. Geffre curb cut to be addressed, if needed, by Hennepin County. 6. The revised plans should reflect a trail easement 10 feet in width abutting Bayside Road. An easement exhibit has been provided by the developer. Planning Staff Recommendation The applicants have submitted revised plans as directed which have been reviewed and approved by the consulting City Engineer. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat according to the attached resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED The Council should consider adopting the attached resolution approving the preliminary plat. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT OUTLOT C, BAYVIEW FARMS 2No ADDITION FILE NO. 13-3591 Council Exhibit A WHEREAS, Ervin Anthony Wachman Jr. and Michelle Marie Wachman, a married couple (hereinafter the "Developers") are the owners of the property within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") identified as property identification number 06-117-23-22-0018 and legally described as Outlot C, Bayview Farms 2"d Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "Property"); and WHEREAS, on January 23, 2013 , the Developers filed a complete application with the City for preliminary approval of a five (5) lot residential plat of the Property ; and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Subdivision Codes, on February 19 , 2013 the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the application at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning the application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on February 19, 2013 the Planning Commission reviewed the application and recommended on a vote of 5 to O that the City Council grant preliminary plat approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the proposal at a regular meeting held on March 11 , 2013, and hereby made the following findings with regards to this application: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #13-3591. 2. The Property is zoned RR-1 B Single Family Rural Residential District , which requires a minimum lot area of 2.0 acres and minimum lot width of 200'. The Property totals 13 .72 acres in area of which 13.01 acres is considered as dry , buildable land and 0 .71 acres is wetland . 3. The Property is guided in the 2008-2030 Orono Community Management Plan (CMP) for single family residential use at a density of 1 unit per 2 acres . The proposed layout Page 1 of 8 contains 5 residential lots on 13 .01 non-wetland acres , for an overall density of 1 unit per 2.6 dry acres (0 .38 un its per acre). 4 . The proposed plat includes 5 residential bu ilding lots, each of which will be accessed via a proposed private road to be constructed by the Developers , extending southerly from Bayside Road (a .k.a. CSAH 84). The private road will be subject to homeowner association ownership and ma intenance, and subject to an underlying Road , Drainage and Utility Easement to be granted to the City , as well as a "Declaration of Covenants , Conditions, Restrictions and Private Roadway Easement" either as a separate document or incorporated into the development covenants. 5 . The Developers have submitted a Conservation Design Master Plan (COMP) consisting of a Site Ecological Summary and Project Recommendat ions regarding Conservation Design requirements by Kjolhaug Environmental Services (KES) dated February 6, 2013 which includes the invasive species removal and maintenance provisions of the Bayside Meadows Invasive Species Management Plan dated 02/26/2013 prepared by KES . The KES report addresses specific actions that have been ta ken or will be implemented to protect identified resources , including ma intenance of existing drainage patterns ; tree preservation ; wetland protection ; and view p rotection . Information about these protective measures will be provided to lot buyers about the protective measures required for the property. 6 . The COMP identified existing tree stands along the southeast portion of the property and along the western property line . These existing tree stands are proposed to be preserved via tree protection easements. With the exception of the area connecting the private road to the north , the entire perimeter of the Property is proposed to be in either a conservation easement , a tree protection easement , or a wetland conservation easement. 7. Additionally the Planning Commission recommended additional trees be planted along the southwestern lot line within t he proposed tree preservation easement. 8. Proposed Lot 1 contains 3.05 dry buildable acres ; proposed Lot 2 contains 2.25 dry buildable acres ; proposed Lot 3 contains 2.32 dry buildable acres; proposed Lot 4 contains 2.02 dry buildable acres ; and proposed lot 5 has 2.01 dry , buildable acres . 9. Lot 1 is proposed to have 673 .5 feet of frontage along the new private road ; Lot 2 will have 92. 3 feet on the cul-de-sac ; Lot 3 is also on the cul-de-sac and will have 106.8 feet of frontage ; Lot 4 is proposed to have 222 .34 feet of frontage , partially on the cul-de-sac ; and proposed Lot 5 will have 438.4 feet in width . Ea ch proposed lot contains a building site which meets the RR-1 B setback requirements of 50 ' front and rear and 30' sides . 10. The proposed lots will be served by individual on-site sewage treatment systems and private wells. Each lot has been tested and shown to have primary and alternate conform ing septic system drainfield sites. Page 2 o f 8 11. A delineated wetland exists in the eastern portion of the property and will be subject to the standard wetland preservation requirements including establishment of buffers and granting of Wetland Flowage and Conservation Easements and Buffer Covenants. 12 . The Property is identified in Orono's Surface Water Management Plan (January 2011) as being partially located within the NA-1 drainage area which drains southeasterly toward a larger wetland body (pond NA-P2) and the FL-2 drainage area which drains southwesterly to another wetland area (pond FL-P2). Stormwater runoff from the proposed road will be directed toward a stormwater basin to be constructed west of the proposed road between Lots 4 and 5 and will discharge eastward to the wetland on Lots 1 and 2. 13. The Planning Commission recommended the Developer grant a 10-foot easement along Bayside Road for future trail purposes . A trail easement will be granted as part of the subdivision along the northerly 10 feet of the road outlet for potential future City trail construction. 14. The proposed private road is shown as 1053 feet , which exceeds the maximum length of 1000 feet for a cul-de-sac. The variance requested is reasonable and the Developer will be required to comply with the Fire Marshal 's recommendations and requirements regarding the road width and length . 15. The Developer proposes to conduct grading activities on the properties at 4645 Bayside Road and 4665 Bayside Road to accommodate construction of the new private road. A retaining wall and a development monument sign are also proposed to be constructed on the 4645 Bayside Road property. 16. The Developer has proposed suggested building pad elevations for each of the lots in the development. 17. All proposed lots will contain suitable area meeting all established setback requirements to allow the construction of single family residences. 18. The Bayview Farms 2nd Addition plat approval included a stipulation that future development of Outlet C, Bayview Farms 2nd Addition would require the relocation of the driveways serving the two existing, adjacent homes onto the new private road. The future driveway re-location was a condition of the plat approval outlined in Resolution Nos. 3483 and 3492. 19. Hennepin County has been requested to review the current proposal and advise the City whether the County will accept the Geffre request to not relocate the driveway at 4665 Bayside Road as per Resolution Nos. 3483 and 3492 . 20. City Council will accept Hennepin County's conclusion on the relocation of the Geffre 's access. Page 3 of 8 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above , the City Council of the City of Orono hereby grants Preliminary Plat Approval for a 5-lot plat per the Preliminary Plat survey/drawing by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc . dated 02/15/2013 and attached hereto as Exhibit A , subject to the following conditions: 1) The Preliminary Plat approval granted by this Resolution shall expire one year from the approval date (March 11 , 2014). 2) Approval is subject to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) approval and permits as required . Final plat approval shall not be granted until the Developer has provided evidence that all required MCWD permits have been obtained. 3) Approval is subject to Hennepin County approval of the proposed private road location and permits as required . Final plat approval shall not be granted until the Developer has provided evidence that all required Hennepin County permits have been obtained. 4) The Developer shall construct the required private road and stormwater management facilities on the Property. 5) The Developers shall adhere to their COMP consisting of the Site Ecological Summary and Project Recommendations regarding Conservation Design requirements by Kjolhaug Environmental Services (KES) dated February 6, 2013 including implementation of the invasive species removal and maintenance provisions of the Bayside Meadows Invasive Species Management Plan dated 02/26/2013 prepared by KES . 6) Development Fees. a) Park Dedication Fee. The development is subject to the standard Park Dedication Fee for 5 new lots x $5 ,550.00 per lot= $27,750 . b) Storm Water and Drainage Trunk Fee. The development is subject to the standard Storm Water and Drainage Trunk Fee of $3 ,840 per acre x 13.72 total acres = $52,684.80*. (*Fee will be determined based on the current Fee Schedule at the time when the final plat application is made.) 7) Approval of the Final Plat is subject to compliance with the existing and ongoing recommendations of the City Engineer. 8) In order to facilitate preparation of the final documents, as soon as feasible , the Applicant shall submit to the City written legal descriptions for all required easements as noted herein. Page 4 of 8 9) Plans and Specifications. The following plans and specifications shall be submitted for review and approval by the City and other appropriate jurisdictions prior to final plat approval, to ensure that the proposed plat will accomplish the intended purposes: a) Final grading, drainage and erosion control plan showing existing and proposed contours, anticipated building locations, elevations , stormwater facilities and calculations, utilities and erosion control measures to be used during construction. Final Plat Approval will not be granted until the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has approved the stormwater management plans. b) Final planting plan which shall include final cul-de-sac and entry planting plans with tree calculations. c) Final plans for installation of the development identification monument sign. A separate Sign Permit is required prior to installation . d) Final road construction plans. e) Final stormwater management plan. f) Final stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP). g) Sufficient detail to meet the recommendations of the City Engineer. 10) Easements Required. a) Drainage and Utility Easements shall be dedicated to the public on the final plat 1 O' along all exterior property lines , and 5' either side of interior property lines, except such easements shall be increased to accommodate drainage where required, subject to City staff approval. b) A Drainage and Utility easement shall be dedicated to the public on the plat over the storm water pond area and storm water facilities. c) A Road, Drainage and Utility Easement shall be granted to the City over the private road outlot, as well as a "Declaration of Covenants , Conditions, Restrictions and Private Roadway Easement" either as a separate document or incorporated into the development covenants. d) A Wetland Flowage and Conservation Easement and Buffer Covenant shall be granted over wetlands and wetland buffers on the Property. Page 5 of 8 e) A Public Trail Easement shall be dedicated over the northerly 1 O feet of the road outlet (Outlet B, Bayview Farms 2nd Addition). f) A Tree Preservation Easement within the areas of each of the lots as identified in the KES report and Site Conservation Plan dated 02/15/2013 (Plan Sheet CP). g) A Conservation Easement over the portions of Lot 1 as identified in the KES report and Site Conservation Plan dated 02/15/2013 (Plan Sheet CP). h) Temporary Construction Easements over the portions of the properties at 4645 Bayside Road and 4665 Bayside Road to accommodate the proposed grading and construction improvements. FINAL SUBMITTALS The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Planning & Zoning Coordinator at least four (4) weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month. These submittals are as follows: 1. Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies (one copy for the City's records and one for filing with Hennepin County) and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200'. Drawing to include: A. Lot lines platted per preliminary plat survey/drawing by David B. Pemberton, of Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. dated 02/15/2013 attached hereto as Exhibit A , except as modified herein. 8. Dedication of "Drainage and Utility Easements" 1 O' along exterior property lines, 5' along the interior property lines and over the storm water pond, ditches and facilities. C . Dedication of "Drainage Easements" over all drainageways. D. Dedication of "Drainage Easements" over the wetland and wetland buffer. E. Naming of plat. F. Naming of the private road. Page 6 of 8 2. Legal documents required: A. Title opinion addressed to the City or a title insurance policy in favor of the City covering the Property as well as Outlets Band D, Bayview Farms 2nd Addition. All owners , mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. B. The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the Property as well as Outlets B and D Bayview Farms 2nd Addition. C. Signed Developer's Agreement including the appropriate Letter of Credit in an amount to be determined by the City Engineer, and a cash escrow which covers engineering inspections and other city costs. D. Signed Stormwater Pond Easement. E. Signed Wetland Flowage and Conservation Easement and Buffer Covenant. F. Signed Road , Drainage and Utility Easement over the private road outlet , and Declaration of Covenants , Conditions, Restrictions and Private Roadway Easement to include the private road as well as Outlets B and D Bayview Farms 2nd Addition. G. Trail Easement. H. Signed Tree Preservation Easement. I. Signed Conservation Easement. J. Signed Covenant to Protect Drainfield Sites . 3. Plat approval fees to be paid : Total due: $81,134.80 A. Final plat fee: $700.00 B . Park Dedication Fee: $27 ,750 . Page 7 of 8 C. Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee: $52,684.80. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on the 11th day of March , 2013. ATTEST: Rachel Dodge , City Clerk Property Owner STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Lili Tod McMillan, Mayor Property Owner This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of _______ , 2013 by Ervin Anthony Wachman Jr. husband of Michelle Marie Wachman. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Notary Public This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of _______ , 2013 by Michelle Marie Wachman.wife of Ervin Anthony Wachman Jr. Notary Public Page 8 of 8 .., .., ,., , f") ,o ·Ji· .,,, • .., T---L I I I I I I I I I I I l \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ --- --r I I ~--- i ! ~ I!" g I I DISTRIBUTION. ANO/OR CONVEYANCE OF lOUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN A UTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT i TITUTES AN ILLEGITIM ATE USE AND SH ALL THEREBY UIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. l ESERVES THE RtGHT TO HOLO ANY ILLEGITIMATE .ESPONS IBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES R ESUL TlNG (COUN~Y ROAD NO. 84) --_I ?A:f~i(RS __ :~~:<_ I IK•n.ily t:cnify tha1 1his su rvey, pl:m or n:pon w.is prcpan.'d by mcor und~'f my dim.:1 sur1.·rYision ;11111 tb,n I il m a duly Lkl."llsl,I Land Surveyor wukT the laws of1h i.: S1atcofMi1u1 1.">ola. D,icsl th is\ "::tt::11>~. Da,id B. P,111 ~,mm. Pruf"~,.~,,,-,,1-'L'-a,-,.I-S-,n,-,,-.,,------ Minu~·sot,1 Lic1.'tN' Nu .. .rnru LOT I BL0CK2 I I _l_ "' 0 0 0 0 I I '\. n_ I Resoluti on Exh ib it A I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I ~ l~I I I ~ l~I I I ~ [!~I I I ~151 I I ~l~I I I g1~1 I I ~il:!I I I I I I I I I ! I ~ ~l ~I I I I I 0 I IT T1 1 z ~ (L >-a::: <( z ~ ...J w a::: (L en ~ 0 0 <( w ~ w 0 en ~ co <( -1-o o z en ow a:::z 0~ ~ TWP .117. RGE.23 • SEC .( HENNEPIN COUN TY SATHRE-BERGQU IST, IN C. BOOK XXX/PAGE XXX ORON O, MINN ESOTA 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYl.ATA , MN _ 55391 (9S2) 4 76"6000 NO/UH 80 4 0 40 80 160 SCALE IN FEET WET A-1 Denotes Wetland Delineation/Flag ldLn ti llL'r -98 Denotes Exis1ing Contour ~De1101es Proposed Co111our • Dmotcs Found Monumc.,u -As Deno1cd @ 0 Dcntocs Fouud Ca~I . Iron -M01rnnK11t Dcno1 cs 112"' by 14• Iron Pipe Si..--t and Marked by License No. 40344 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEM ENTS ARE S HOWN TH US: _s_ ::j NOTTO SCALE Be ing 5 fet,1: in width and adjoining lol linL-s:, w1l ess Qthcrwise ind icalcd. and IO feel in width and adjoining righf o f way lin(!), unkss olht.-rwise iudica1ed, as s howu on the plat. (COUN~I ,~ii~E<?sAD N?RE~J ) ---------'" 1en1. ,er.,,. I I _L ------------------_:qn • ·' u. • um, " 1011!t "' . :;i 1--- 327.58 -i;,,--:0 -- T---\ L i l !O)l !OJ • IRVIN It M~~E CEFFR[Oli j PIOf-061172322001 7 • :IC;iao SO()o. 200.67 -16.ao s·0c"'f 0 ~'i} U,00 -t --- I \ \ \ \ "' 1~ 8 I I LOT I BAYVIEW if>"V,· OP(N •10,, •• . ,..,,, ' 145.22 R•313.3~ 6•44°49':::.4• LOT I BLCX:K 2 I I i I I I I "' ~, 8 --- -...... ., ... i;i-.. l 0..-·•n,.,a..a .. 1 ~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ·-·~~~~m~,·~~~~~--- 1 O...rR, $8'3°37'07"\V 057.56 o .... l:R, 1 1r,'°i'}r Ol'Ol .t:ffREY .I: PATRICIA THUU C.A . ARM STRONG PASS ,k B.J. PASS PIOf-06117232.300\g PICJf-0611 723230021 I I t--D:..:E_S_IG_N_E'-R--i-~+-B'-Y-I--D"-A,-T-'E'-1--------'R.;.:E:..;V.;.:IS::.ID::;Nc;;S:..._ ____ ---I USE (INCLUDING COPY I NG, DISTRIBUTION. AND/OR CONVEYAN CE OF ~p 01/21113 ADO OUTLOT A (RMI) _____ INFORMATION} OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOU T I h ttdJy cenify that !his survey, plan or report was prepared by meor under m y din.'t:t s upervis ion and lha t I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor unJcr lhe laws o f the St.1 1cofMi.Jmcw1a . DRAWN BY DBP CHECK ED B Y DBP D ATE 01/17113 .Q!!P 02/15/13 REVtSE PER CITY COMMENTS SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC."s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATI ON. USE WITHOUT ----------SAID AUTHORIZAT!ON CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY -------------INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST. INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY . ------------S ATHR E-BE RGQUIST. INC. RESERVES THE RIG HT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE ------------USERORPARTYLEG ALLYRESPONStBLE FOROAMAGES OR L OSSES RESULTING FROM ILL EGIT MAT E USE. Oati.'d th is 2 s r day auuary, 2013. \ Da vid 8 . Pember1on , Professional Lant! Survc:.")'or Minnt..~ta License No. 40J44 SATHRE-BERGQUI ST , INC . 150 SOUTH BROA DWAY WAYZATA , MN. 55391 {952) 476 -6000 DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY Outlol C, except the No11h 123.00 feet of1hc W est 148.50 fcctofOutlot C, BAYVI EW FARMS 2ND ADDITION. Hennepin. SITE ADDRESS Unassigned · Orono. Mll•ncsota 55359 This survey docs not pu1port to show any underground utililics. The source or infonnation from plaru and mark ings will be combinL-d with observed evidence of utilities 10 develop a view o f those undcrground utilities. However, lacking excavation, the cxac1 location of underground fea tures cannot be accurately , completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or mosc detailed informatior1 is r<.,quired, the client is advised lhat excavuion may be lll'CC!\.Sary. The comractor shall determine the ex act location Qf any and all e xisting utilitic.'S before com1m .. '0Cing work. The con1rac1or shall be folly responsible for any and all damages arising out of his failure to exactly locate and protect all cx is1 ing utility facilities. Contac1 GOPHER ST A T E ONE CALL at 651 ~454-0002 for precise onsilc locatio n o f utilities prior to any excavation. Cusrom Ho m e Builders Til le, LLC. as issuing agent for Old Republic National Title Insurance Company commitmenl for litk insurance file No. HB-25058. cffcc1ivcdatcofDccemhcr 3, 2012, was relied upou as to ma ncrs ofn.-cord. The subject property appears to lie within Zone X, (area of areas outside the l -pcrcc111 annual chance floodplain. areas o f I% a!Ulual chance sheet flow flooding where average deptlis arc less lhan I foot, areas of I% annual chance stream floodin g where the contributing drainage area is Jess than I square mile, or areas pr otected from tl1c !Yo annual chance flood by k v et.>s . No Base FIOOll E levations or dt-pths are shown within tl1is zone. Insurance p urchase is not rL,quircd in rhcse zones.), pC:.T the National Flood lnsur.mcc Program, Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Pan el No. 27053C0285E, dated S<:p1cmb<:r 2, 2004 as acquired from 1hc FCl.kral Emergency ManagC1n1.'Tl t Agency Web Site. Arca lnfonna1ion: Lo t A rca .., 597,643 Sq. Fl.-13.72Acrcs Currem zoning an,! sc1back information: Zoning: RR-18 · (}ne Family Rural Resid ential Building Setbacks· Front Yard . 50 fec..--t Rear Y.ard · 50 feL'1 Side Yard -30 feet / Street -50 foct •zoning a nd Setback in fonnation provided by the Planning Department of the City ofOrooo. Surve y coordinate and btaring basis : ~knnepi.:n Cowity Coon1inalc Base No modifications to this )urvey or sk etch may be pl.'tformed by any person o tlKT than the surveyor ~igning this ccrti(icalion or persons under his direct supervi sion. This dra wing and data is protoctcJ by federal copyright laws . !Is rcproduetion and redistribution wi1hout proper conseru is prol1ibi1cd. Btnchmark: MNDOT G~clic Control S1atinn Y I 17 RESET -Maple Plain Elevation -1013.43 feet {NGY D29) TITL E COMMITMENT NOTES, I 0. Parcel s ubject lo utility aud d rain age e aseme111s as shown on the plat of BAYVIEW FARMS 2ND ADDITION . 11. Parcel subject 10 terms and conditions of Flow age and ConsLTVation Easement and Waiv1.'T of Damages. in ravor of the C i1y of Orono, which gra nts the right to restrict 1hc use, improvcrncrus and developme nt over 1hc wctlnnds H ~hown o n the plat or DA YVIEW FARt\·1S , lilW vu fi..-b1 uary 12, 1980, as Docum"'n: No. 1371023. (Defined as •as shown on the plat of BAYVIEW FARMS·}. 12. Parcel s ubjL'CI 10 tmns and co11di1ions o f Road and Utilities Easement for public ingress, egress, acn'Ss, road and :...Hi1ics purposes, in favor of City of Orono, a s created in document da ted Octobt.-r 28, 1994, filed November 29, 1994, as Documcm No. 2570025. (Over Outlot D, BAYVIEW FARMS 2ND ADDITION) 13. Parcel subject 10 t erms and co11di1io11s of Road and Ulilities Easc1m11ts for public ingress, egress, access, road and utililies purposes. in favor of City of Orono, as c reatL--d in documt.iit dated Oco tber 28, 1994, fili..'CI Nm•cmber 29, 1994, as Doeumenl No. 2570026. (Over Oullot B, BAYVIEW FARMS 2ND ADDITl0N) 14. Acce ss IO the subj1:c1 properly is limited over p ublic easement in favor ofthc City of Orono. IS. Parcel subject 10 wetlands which may be subject to federal , Sl411e, or local regulation. Parcel subjccr to lrnns and con ditions for Driveway Easemi..,11 OvL-r Outlo l B, BAYVJEW FARMS 2ND ADDITION, m favor of Lot I, Block I, BAYVIEW FARM S 2ND ADDITION. (Shown o n Ccr1ifica1c o f Title) TWP .117 -RGE.23 -SEC.06 HE NN EPI N COUNTY BOOK XXXIPAGE XXX ORONO, M INN ES OTA PRELIMINARY PLAT BAYSIDE MEADOWS Council Exhibit B FILE.NO 31202-070 pp pp SY MBOL LEGEND LOT LINE BUILDING SETBACK BOUND A RY PARCEL BOUNOARY LINE DRAINAGE AND UTILIT Y EASEME NTS RIGHT-OF-WAY FLARED END SECTION W/RIP-RAP --»--. STORM STUCTURE LABEL m WELL e SEPTIC SITE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SWALE V I (/) :::i; 0, -o (/)0 J: 0 ,_N .. -Q:~~ L..J <( N iN~ o:::.~ ~ Lo.Jo ;is I "" uo 12 0:: ..., \ I ) L DESIGN DATA: STREET SECTION. OWN ER: PE TER & SH ARON RE NNEB OHM PIDN-0611 72321 00 0 5 CONSERVATION EASEMENT D .... \ \ .J I \ . I (; ,I I I \ ! J J b I I II! .. , .. !ii I :i OWN ER: JAM ES MORGAN & DE BRA PULFORD PIDN-0 611 723220022 SITE DATA • ---~ ~ "" 0 V'-' . 0 D TREE PRESERVATION EASEMENT OWNER : OWN ER: JAM ES & JULIE DZUB A Y PIDN -0 6 1172322 0023 SOIL BORIN G LOCATION B ENCHMARK/ FOUND IP • I 5" SPWE82408 WEAR COURSE (MN DOT 2J60) 2 .5" SPN W8230B BASE COURSE (MN DOT 23&0) 8" CL 5 AGGREGATE BASE (MN DOT 3138) SUBGRA OE FABRIC (8 OZ/SY. NO N-WOVEN) (if required) ZONING: RR-18 M IN LOT AREA: 2.0 AC M IN L OT WIDTH· 200 FT AMERIC AN HOME MORTG A GE PID#-061172322 002 1 PRE CONSTRUCTION SILT FENCE POST CONSTRUCTION Sil T FENCE SEPTIC PROTECTION FENCING WOODFIBER BLANKET DtTCH CHECKS UTILITY POLE 6" (2' wide) CL 7 AGGREGATE SHOULDER CROSS SECTION: 3% CROWN 10' PAVEMEN T WID TH 2' AGGREGATE SHOULDER 3:1 DITCH SLOPE 'Z' TYPICAL OiTCH DEPTH 3' TYPICAL OSTCH WIDTH INSTALL CULVERTS FOR EACH DRIVEW AY WITH HOME CON STRUCTION DESIGNER BY +..;...a...+-'---+-'0;.;,A""TE=-if-------'R,::Ec:,Vl:;::S:;::IO.:.:NS=------1 USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, ANO/OR CONVEYANCE OF RSM DRAWN BV RSM CHECKED BV """ DATE 01-15-13 RSM RSM 02·1M3 La: t.re Rr,,iaion, ...-.-.~ INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS S TRIC TLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT 02·15-13 -_ S-.•La,cMperCfyComnerc:.. _ _ SATHRE-BERGQUIST, 1NC 's EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION USE WITHOUT S AID AUTHORI ZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE A ND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC OF ALL RESPONSIB ILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC RESERVES THE RI GHT TO HOLD A N Y ILLEGITIMATE USE R OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RE SUL TING FROM ILLEGHMATE use FYSB • SOFT SYSB • 30FT SYSB STRT. 50 FT R Y SB • 50 FT ·• MAX COS LENGTH -1000 FT ••• MIN CURVE 275 FT 50 25 0 25 50 PSN- SCALE IN FEET I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED SY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION >NO THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROF ESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE O F M INNE S OTA. Robert S M~~,d, PE Date· .Qf./Jd[3 Lk:, No. Jd.'f1-t ~~¢> I i ", <li,~"s 100 I $<4,"'t<'"'" i "' $ p\.-''# f,_'"' EEVt:O FEB 2 8 2013 CITY OF ORONO SAT HR E-BERGQUIST, INC . 150 SOUT H BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN 55391 (952) 476-6000 OWN ER: TREE PRESERVATION EASEMENT BRADLEY PASS PIDN-0611 723 2 40001 Counci l Exhibit C \ \ \ ~-\ DEV ELOPER ERVIN WACHMA N 2135 Sa lem Court Long L a ke , M innesota 55365 PROJECT C ON SULTA N T WILLIAM COFFMAN \ \ Co01nan De\·d opmat1 Services. Inc. ('c-11ular 61:!-201-069:? l~na11 t,,llcofTman(a cbbum,1.et.•m CITY PROJECT NO ORONO, MINNE SOTA \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ·o 1.-_ .. _ j ' I I , \.. -, ---~-----J ---t.-----" --- /) I ('j:::J cf.J () 0 OWNER: ERIN SU LLIVAN PID#-061 1723220024 SHEET I NDEX TAB LE I Description I Pre limina ry S ite P la n I ExistinQ Cond itions P lan I A lta S urvey I P relim inary Pl at (/) (/) <( Q. S heet SP EX AA PP GP ST LS A"ria l I Prel im inary G rad ino & Erosion Contro l P lan I Preliminary S treet P lan & P rofile I La ndsca o ino Pla ns I Aerial -500' Set back P lan PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN BAYSIDE MEADOWS F ILE NO . 3 1202-070 SP SP I SYMBOL LEGEND LOT LINE BUILDIN G S ETBACK B OUNDAR Y ---- PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS RIGHT-OF-WAY FLARE D ENO SECTION W/RIP-RAP • STORM STUCTURE LABEL rn WELL • SEPTIC SITE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SWALE ~> SOIL BORING LOCATION 0 BENCHMARK / FOUND IP • PRE CONSTRUCTIO N SILT FENCE ---- ,,/ / / / ,, w "---a:: u..r--u..~ C WO Oo N WN / / r ljl I...) t,5 i ci::,o:;::i l. ~s;;i .... 3: a::~ 0 <( '° :::;;:o ~,lo, z9 50.. ~ ·, •, l l L D ... J. :ii ~ OWN ER: PETER & SHARON RENNEBOHM PI D#-0611723210005 0 6 0 I I ~ § oq, ---;fp --1 ;i o'i : I Q ~ I I I I s IC ;; ... .. 00 OOoocO OWN ER: JAMES MORGAN & DEBRA PULFORD PID#-0611723220022 0 ... ! i I 0 OWN ER: .. . 0 I OoOO . ;:. .. IC OWNER: 0 JAMES & JULIE DZUBAY PID #-0611723220023 POST CONSTRUCTION SILT FENCE - SEPTIC PROTECTION FENCING ---AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE PID#-0611 723220021 W OODFIBER BLANKET \;)QQQQq DITCH CHECKS ~ UTILITY POLE <"Q., J--......::.0;:.;ES:=:IG,"N;;:E;..;.R_+'N.:.:O-t-'B"-'Y-t.....;:.;OA.;.;T.:.E-+-----R:.:.:E:..:V.:.:IS::.:10::..;N.:.S ____ --j USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION. ANO/OR CONVEYANCE OF RSM INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED W1THOUT DRAWN BY RSM CHECKED BY XlU< DATE SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC ·s EXPRESS WRIT TEN AUTHORIZATION, USE IM THOUT S AIC AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY -------------INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, IN C. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. ------------S ATHRE-BERGQUIS T, INC RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE ------------USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING __ -· _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FROM ILLEGITMATE USE 5 0 25 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PL.AN OR SPECIFICATION 't.AS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER M Y DIRECT SUPERVISION ANO THAT I AM A DULY R EGISTERED PROFESSIONAL EN G INEER UNO;.R T HE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Robert S Molsljtd. P .E Data . _Q/jtcJJJ Lie. No. ]-{.t..r'Z.:l SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH B ROADWAY WAYZATA , M N 55391 {952) 47 5-eOOO OWNER : BRADLEY PASS PIDN-0611723240001 I! 8 ! ~ 0 0 ~ ~ I .,.,.. I .,.,.. ... I i' . ! tjOO 0 CITY PROJ ECT NO. ORONO, MINNESOTA 0 o<S o o 8oj ,~ 0 ! E IC = IC ·o 0 ~ l, 'oo ooo ·c;ao o oo o OWNER : ERIN SULLIVAN PID#-061172 3220024 EXISTIN G CONDIT ION S PLAN WACHMAN PARCEL (/) (/) <( 0.. -j £DN ~8 I') <f>N .. (/)I') ct:<( N WO.I'- jc.,:= Oz'° 00 a:: I 1--"" V>9 :::;;:o.. a:: <( < c.j F ILE NO. 31 202-070 EX EX LEGEN D AIS Denotes Ad ,·cr11.s1n,•lnfonna11onal Sien At:. Denotes Air Cond1taonmg Urut BfE 01.-nOlcs Oascmcnt Floor El1.""·a1 ion CB D1.1101csCatchD,u in C80X Denot es Curb Uox COL ~esBuiklin1t:olU11V1 BEE Deno(cs 8Wldini r~1rancc EIC\·atton 18 l)cno tcs Tele/Comm. Bo.vl'cd OIH Denotes Communic.111ioo I land ho lc CIIH Dcnolcs C01m numc11ion Manhole CONC Ocno4cs Conc.rd e Sur face CMP Denotes Comiptc<I M(...1.111 Pi pe,Siic DI P Denotes Ductile Iron Pipe/Size EB [)(n01cs Elec1 ric Oox EHH Denotes Elcctnc I Qndhole TRAN Denotes Elcctnc Transfonncr EIIH D1..'notcs Electric Manhole Ell Dl'flOh.-s Eleclric M1.>1cr rH Denotes Fire 1-lookl,Jfl FP Ocnoct:1 Flag Pole rES l:>enoc cs Fla red End Scc1io n·Si1x CASV DcnoccsGasV.-l\'C Gr[ lx.'flotcs Garaac Floor EIC"!.ation CM IA'flOln Gas Meter COi. Denot es Ground Lt~t CP OcnOICS Guard POSt CYW lknOlcs Guy Wm: HCS Denotes Handicap Pa rking Sip HYO Dcnolcs Fire 11,·dtant LP Denotes Lij hl Pole 118 Ocnoies Ma ill)()x NOP Ocl'IO!es No Parkin& S•an OHU Ocnotrs o ,·crhefid Ut ility Linc PKS Denotes Parkin1 Sien PIV Denotes Post Indicator Valve RCP Dt!lOICS Hc·info ~cd Concrete P1pe1Sizc RO lk'notcs Roof Drain sco Denotes Sanimy Clcinout SMH IA'IIO!eJ Sanitary M a nhole sv Denotes Sep1ic Vent STP DL'f'IOll'S S1o p Si en STIIH Denotes Stonn Manhole TRS l>cnoccs Tratn c ConltOI Sign 11. Dcna1 cs Trame t1 i h1 ucc DL11otes Underground Communicati on Linc UC[ Denotes Undcrgrou.nd Electric I.inc: ucc Ocnoles Undcrpound Gas Linc SAN Dcno1cs UndcrilfO!Jnd Sa nitary S4;\\·cr ST Denotes Underground S1onn Sewer UP DcnOICS U1ility Pole UI.P Omolcs Utihly t ie.ht Pok TNH Dcnolts Top Nut o f ll)·dranl -l)cno1cs Waler Manhole WV Dcno1c,s Water Valve t!ET A-1 DcnOles Wetland Oeli ncation,f b g ldcntifit.'T Denotes ExiS11ne Contour --<1i»--Dcnote1 Propo.scd Conto ur • Der.oles Found Mo nument -As Dcnot OO ® Dt.'l'ltoes f oond Cast -Iron -Mon wncnt 0 lxnolcs 112· by 14· lron Pipe Set and Marl.:(d h y l,JCC!W! No 40)44 IIO/fl'H 80 40 40 80 100 SCALE IN FEET I (C0~1:!~AD N£J4) 8~ YS IDE RO A D __________ I ____ _ ·--··-. ::i I I _L ::i ~ . J,i ~g ~\'.001 115~6 . T ~,· • _;.~: .; I :::-., -- _ _ _ .. ~ . .,,/:~ ----327.~--7 -~~;-[· ;r"j, · ~~:r~~~--,=~-~---_:~-- --....... I ' ' / ; ~ ~ 15'o'o"r' . ,.. -:_i Jo.0o1!."0o-.. 11 / / ... .\. --' i " \' ---~ ,,.. .,,.. /.,. J... ' z .> ~ .Iii t ~ C ' --,,. ",. l....! ---, -...:.:.-::~...:,,;-" (' •\ ~ 0;;~,' '(, ··~ \ -'f l / ' ,. ,. I --' \ I \ '° \ . I '/ 1 ' .. ... I/ / ' , ,. .. -~ --\ ', ~ I I I t t ~:211t, I '~•~.22 ' -11 '1 .,./~ .. ---I f~' .. ,\ LOT -I ___ , ,''• \44 r. Rl ,13.~ ' ......... '// / : ----8 --' ' (ld1IIIG ' -.. I ;; RI 6•~4°411':;4" ' TI ' .,;,, .1 -:-~-' . .::.==-ioJ!l ' ,,· fl I) :,7 ~ \ '1 1--' I ,. --. --' ----B' QCK•l '·-' 8 O; ~ ' , :>:>-I ---,o-,::.c..-. ~ ' ', I ./.' I / /fl ·,, I ,::-: -i---l ---Q~~~V{ '' -' --~ I ·~ / Ii{ LOT i'' ' I I / ,' . I --. ---,--...:::::-:.._-:..--;t.\,,I'., / 1 ~, BL<x;K2 'I I I · :-Jli _f=: .. ~~~-~:;:~~--:~~~~-.:~' -~ -,_ _,,,./ ~ 1 / / Mil~ ( -, ·:I '{~~ t!:.~ 2 :_.c<>.:.~. --.:!i."11 \ ,---/ ,._~ ' ,8 I / . ,r.li , .. I~ -! -Q IN l!9"45'02!~79.Jf' /$i' E--}, (__~~'l~ : ,. • g ll:e! :::,-.-., -,-.II'' -~~ , 11 /'\ 1 • , i ·· 1 ---..,;·s .1' ---' ,1.-'tj. (ld--' •-,, ·, 1-I \ I ., j N89°45'00"t DI -,. --', \1 o' ,o.Jll ' \ . -l , 148.50 rf I ----,<.:t ·~-f~·RMS / 1,: _: 1::~ -,__7 _~ ... ,. /-------·q:'_~ --__ -,~1t; ', ......1 , ,,-\I ~<t,.i. .,I. •1 ,." ,---,--~ •..t::::---::::·o,c .•• LJtAM,1f ""!_ -.,._ \ 1 1 J-.~------,, ·~ ~ ----:::=:::--,'1Cf-C!I.!:~ -, .,. ' \ ,, ,...f----=---. ,," _.,,/ · ... _-_:._ ~ -;_-43:s~ig_':.':::,,~, .... :..O-_ ,~~,\ ,, -I .,,,... ,,, *" .. -,--~-~1:·..sa!°E'"::-::.-, _,:,,,, j .,.. ,"" .--->---::--.._.:::,...~;._s~"~I).-,'--=,,, ~·\\,,, I ~ ) -.ar· ---. ,." .,,. --.:-----~·-,.,-~, ..-,.:::-.:--:-..::1 1 -'~~\:· ,, ----e. --/ ., ,,. ,; r ---.... ..... .... -.... _ .-::, .t .. '\\,i ' \ \ ! .,.."' ,--_.,..., .,.., _,,, ---::-... .... ~::::. ........ · .... ~, \\' \ . /., 11 .,-.... // /,,--~ """"';,, ,,,"~ ---..: ..:..;Q._::::'.,, .. , ~., ·, \ ~ ~\ \ -)... .,... , . .,... , .,,,. .,,,. ,, -.... ... . t 8 , ,, I;-I ·, ,., ., .. ": .. /,,,, ,,~:.,,,. /'.,,,. • ----:::-::~~-~-~~~8.~ ~'~~-1!,-~~ \ / / tfll ,, / -., .,,. ,, / .. ------.... ::-:, ...... io,..,~~ l '' ' ·'!: ' ' \ ,...--.... _., .... , .,, I! .... .,,,.'/.,. /// ,,,,,: ".,,,.,:.--.,., .... ----~~":.... 'C" , .... a ·,, . ~ ,, I .,,,. / ,, ..... ,, -. .,, . . "./J7ri' • ... '"', i' ... L ) I I ~ .,,./,; ,. ,,. __ I/,;~~"'~-----~~ ..... ...._ ,, ,,~-11 ,, \ .,~ / .. ,r / ., .-----~ ~ ,, ,,_ ,,, ......... ,, ! ' I / I ." .,, / • // // / ____ .£'.s;r -.~'... ''·~"''' W\/ -')' I I I 1'.,'#°'.;.; . .,,,."",11////,-,~r-..... ~, ....... ':.. -.. ~\~ ,,, i!! )' ·, ,,,r "-~ 1/1.,./ ---·-,:-._."'"\ ....... ..., .. ,,' I \ "\ \ / I I I/ "'10.1172moo,1 ., f I I I ...._. .. .,..' .... , ~-:~,--fll,.. \ ,< I / I I I I _,~~ ... II. I I , I r -,.._.\~,-. •"·,• ' '' ' '"' I " ) , 1 ,/. 1 1 1 ,,.n_,.,,I le \ -:;', ,,,'.\\\°' -'., t / I I ; I I I I \ ' I \ \ "' • \ \\ ',, \ i!..8 ), j. / I / 1 1 I/. I I •I I I I '<'t. ~ ''-',,. ', \ 3° I ~ / I • I I I I C / I I I I I '"\ ·c "' \ ' I( ' / / ;I , ' '\ I I I I ~ ' ~, \\ ~ ,,1 / / , , \ I 01:/TI_OT C1 1 I I ·• ,1, -' ~ ,-. ' ' ',,, -,-. 'I , ,. ' ' I \ I I I I I •;:_\ '1·-\ ' ,, .,-~ All I ~) -<t I I' '· \ ' ' I \ I \ / ... -"'..,· ' '' ' , I" ,c I , ' I 1 , I ' I 1 1', / ' ,. a "' 1 ). , , , , 1 , 1 1 -, , 1 1 , ·"' ·-· \ ~ , a Ot I , \. , . \ \ \ , , ', , i"!!: .•, I"' . •-, 2ND , 1 \ .APDIJION, , -:-::::,,':..,, , .• \ ' '.., ::i_ ao i ,. I '' \,,, , --;:.::;-,,,, i.P..,-' ... !il / / .,,. ---. \ \ \ '. . ),, \ .... -.:.. ~ -' ' ,, ",'-' ,. • ,. ~ .,.. .... ' ' ' '' ' , , .... ---.,,. ..... . ' ,, ' \ I o• i Ji o ,,/,. I -, ' , ', , '\ , . _'.,,,,. , ' ',, ' ' "' I~ , •8 1~ ,.------~ ... ', \ ,'~,.'..:·,' ... , •. --11'\,'' I ~ 11 .. i:: ---...I--zi ( I 1 ' ' ' \ ' . ' ' ., ' I I I I I ·, \ I I ·~j 1 / / 1 /-------, ',,', ',',",,~,', ·"/ \ I J:;: \ \\; -1 1; ,,,, ~' /--I '-,,,,,',, , ,,,,, r ' '' ' ''· ._ '· I I 1 · ' \ I I • -< \. A .• --' ' I I \ I / I I I : : \ -< \ \ I ·,, \ \ / \ \ ~ ·i ',' \ \ : ,'/ : ,' : ', :: 1~1 I •1 I If\ (11 1 1 11 1 ;1 1 1 I I ', ,1 (JJ I I ' I ',f· f '1 '1 / 11 , I I I I ~ \ \ ~ J I • \ ' \ I j I I I I . I , / I I I I I ' ~' I / 'I , I I I I , I I ,· I \ \ , \ , 11<:I ' I I I I I , 1 I·,~, I, . 1 \', ,, ,,, ,rt\,\:\,, \,, . 1 I j / / / '\ \ ' ' 'k \ \I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ .,"~· I', . ,,\,, ',\" ,\,,,,\,,,,\'\I I ~ I I \ I I \ ~ \ ' ' ' \ t \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , .. --, 1, 1 I , -' , ', \ , i. ' ., ' , ' , ' '' , 'll"'"'- 18 1 J 1 , 1 1 I 1 ', \ , , 1 1 , 1 \' ' \' , ' , ' '·' ' "'~~ ' ~* :" t , '.. I ' , , .... , , , , , \ \, , , \ , , ... '-, ~J.''( ·.. , / I / I • \ \ ' \ \ l-'\ , ' ' '\ '', ',1) '\,.,._;-Q. ' ' , I' , " , , 1 r, , , ·, , , , . ...-~, , , I I • \ ' I \ \ ').. \ \ \ • ' \ \ ' \ '~~;ft ' ' '-·, l / , I ... \ ', I \ t \ '\ \' ' ',••', '~' ',', / // ,, I ", \ ' \ \ •, \ \ \ \ \ ' ~..f~ ... !-,-... '\...._ ', ,· ,,. / L I / '-, \ , \ \ I \ \ \ , '4".,.<D:J--'::, ','-\.', \ , .,,,.' /. 10/. ' / I \ \ __ ~_!_-' .. ' I '\ '\ "~ ......... '',',_:,,Oi·. / /.,, ... ,, '/:? :..i / • TR({ L' .. L,~, y "' \, b \ \. }'j..... ·, \ T \' ---,,. ::_,... ~ . .,s;~ ~~,-H \ ' "--'_ )/ \ 0\ T / ,r, -c;,,;".._ L --S8\J 0 J7'07"W 657.~ \ ~'It: 1' I , / I I I :. , .,,. :-~ -~'=l.:;r,=D)I~ I \ \ C.A.. .-.s=; 3~\l f A.."'5 \ ( I I ' .,. ------I I I I PIO ,0111 • I I I I I I I /I,,.--l ',, \ \ \ \' \ \ \ \, \ \ \ l / ,\" ',' ,'\','\''',',''\ .. .... .......... 0 .. e ... s 1G ..... N ... ER_-it----t-8'-Y'-i ..... D"-A"-TE=-+------"R"'EV.;.;l:;;;S;.:ID;;;N:;;;S _____ -I use (INCLUD ING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, ANOIOR CONVEYANC E OF INFORM ATION )OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBIT ED W ITHOUT SATHRE-8ER GOUIST, INC 's EXPRESS WRITTEN AU THORIZATIO N . USE WI THOUT SAID AU THORI ZATION CONSTI T UTE S AN ILLEG ITIM A TE U SE ANO S HALL T HE REBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BE RGQUIS T, IN C. OF ALL RE SPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIG HT TO HOLD A N Y ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONS IBLE FOR DAM AGES OR LOSSES RE SUL TI NG FROM ILLE GITMATE USE. DRAWN BY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, IN C . D8P CHECKED BY ,so SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA , MN , 55 301 (052)'7e-eooo 08P DATE 0 1117/13 DF-5('R IPTI ON Of SUI IJ l:CT PROP FH.fY OullQt C. except the No n h 123.11(1 feet ofthc West 148 .50 fee t ofO ut101 C, llAYVI EW FARMS 2Nl) AJ)DITIO N. lh:n nepin . SITE M QRl·SS Unassig.nt.'d • Orono. Minne110ta 5 5:>59 Th is survey docs not purport lo ~how any Ul\dcfiround ut1lit1c ~. T he source of infonnatio n from pla ns and niarkin gs will be cotnbincd wilh observed e...id ence of ul ilities 10 develo p a v iew oflho se w\derifOU •'ld u1ili1ie1 . llowcvcr, lad:ina u.cavatkm. the c,ac t location o r u nd ereround rc.a1 urc:t cannot be: accura1cly , cotnpku:ly and rcha~y d epicted Where add 111o nal or more det1 il.:d inlormation is ~ired, th e client ,, ad,·iscd that eM:I \II M')ll may be n«ns:1ry. T he contrac to r ~1.11 11 d ctcnnh1e me cxacl kx:a tio n o f a ny a nd a!! exis.1in~ u1 lliti1,.--s hcrore commcncing "'Ork T he con1rae1or :sh.;a ll be ful ly rcsrons,blc for any and a ll d ama vcs a risin g out o f his fa ihuc lo cxac!ly locate and protect all cxi~ing Ulihty l'lu:1litlCS. Con&.acl GOPIIER STAT E ON b CAU. at 651 •454 -0002 for p rcciscons11c loc:alion o f u11li1k'i prior to an)' exca.,·a1;on, C ustom Home Bui klct s f il lc. L LC, a s 1hui11g agent for Oki Repub lic N11 iorul Ti1lc Insurance Company commmnt.Tll foJJ 1i1lc an:iUf1 ntc fil e No . 118·:?SOSS. cffoc ll\C elate ofo«cmbcr 3 . ::!0 1 :?, -«,'H rel ieJ upon as IO mancn of reco rd The subjt.'CI p roperty appears 10 lie w ith in Zone X, (area of areas outside the 1-pcrcc nl a1mua l c hance lloodplain. a reas of 1•. annual chance ~C1 llO\\' tloodin, "here l \·cra tte dcpth.s arc less than I loot , areas o f 1•-..a nnual chance we:am llood1ne \\'here the contr.hutin,: drlma gc aru 1i less than I sq uar e mile. or are.as protected lrom the 1• • a nnual cha nce flood by Jc\·ccs. No Base Flood ElcntM:'l n!I o r depths a rc sho-.n "''illlln th u wnc. Insurance pun::ha~ i:. l\04 r~u,red in these 7..onts,). pc: the Na11011a1 f lood Jnsura,1cc Program . Fklod Insurance Rate Map Conununity Panel No . :?70SJC0285 6, dated September?, 200 4 as ac quired from the FL'<!eral Umc ricncy Ma11J11cmcn1 A11ency W t.'b Suc Arc.a tn fon nauon : l..ot Arca • 597.64\ Sq Ft .· 13.7:? Acres Current .1.oning 3nd sc1 t,,r.:k info nna1io n 7.onme.· RR·IB • One family Runi l Re:OOenu al Ou1 khn g Setbacks froo· Yard· SO flX"t Rea r Ya rd • SO R"tt Sid e Yard • .lO fet.'1 1 Street· 50 fee 1 •zon,ng and Setback mfmna1 ion prond ed t,y lhc l'lanrnni Dcpan rnt.'fll orthe C11y or<>rono Sun·ey coordina te and bcanng ha,is ; llen ncptn County C'oord ina le Base No moJilka1ioos to tllis SUt\'Cy J t sketch may h e pcrfon ned hy a ny f>t.'1':IO R 01hcr lhan the surveyo r sig111nv 1his ccnilicauon or ~is l,lnder hi~ d irect SUf>t.'T\'ision l hi s drn .ing and data is protect«! by (cderal COfl)Ti ght la••s Its rcproduchon and rn hstnbutma ., ilhOul proper consent 1s prohibited Benchmark . M?I.Tl)()T (i t.'Odc li( Conuo l Sta 11o n YI 17 RESET· Maple Plain Elc\'at,on • 10 13 43 feel (N(iVD29) l'ITLf:C'OMM lTM l:NT NOTE": 10 Parcel subj e(I IO utilny ah.I draan.aee cucments as shown on the phu ofDA YVl l;W FARM S 1ND ADDITIO N. 11. Parcel subjec t 10 lt.'TtnS and conJ1t1on s ofFlowa ee ant.I C'onscr\'ation Easemem a nd Waiv t.nJf D:un ai;es . in favor o f 1hc Cit)' of Orono, which a ra,11s the ri g.ht IO r e.s1r ic1 th e use. 1mpf0\·cin1.·,u s and dt\·elopmcm o,·cr UK-wetlands;&$ $ho1o1.•n oo the p l.a l of BA YVll!W FARMS. lilcd on February 12 • l ?SO, a s Dowmenl No . I \7101-1 {Dctincd H ·usoown on lhc p l.a l ofR/\Y VIUW FARMS-} I ::! Parcel suhj cc t to tcnns a nd 1:onditi0t:1i o f Road and Ut ilities l~scmc n1 for put,lic in rifess , egrt.-ss , :trr't'""· mail :tnd u111ities flUl'J)0~'-'11, l,1 fa,,or o f Ci1y o f Oron o , u crc.1tcd in docw11 ffll d:.ted Ck1oh<:r 1 8. 1994 , tiled No vember :??. 1994. as Docuincnl No 25 700 :?5 (0-,•cr Outlo1 D. BAYVIEW FARMS :?NO ADDITION) IJ . l'arc cl subject 10 1cmts ard cond111onsofRoad 3nd U11l11ies Easemen1s fo r puhlic ini:ress. egress. access. road and utilit ie s 11ufl)Oscs. ln favor o f ('il)' of Orono . a s crca 1ed in documen1 da1cd <x:othcr 211 . 1994, filed No\'emt'lcl 29. 1?94. as IJoc wn t.-nl No . 2.S700:?6. (O\er OuUOI n. llA Y V lliW 1:AJU.'IS 2NU ADDITIO N) 14. Access '° ll\e ~bJCCt propcr1 y 1.s limited 0 1·er p ublic easemcnl in fa \·orof lhc C'i1)' of Orono. 15. l'arccl whjecl to" clland;, which 1n;ay he subject 10 federal, sl31C. or local re~ulation. l'mel suhjecl 10 1cnns: a ~J cond111ons lor Or n·C"A ay Easement over OuUot U, UA YVIEW FARM~ :?NlJ ADD ITION , 111 fa\'('rof Lot I, Uloc k I. HAYVl 6 W 1:ARM S 2ND AOOITIO N. {Sho,\n o n C'crtiticate ofT,lle) n 1s ts .occnify 1oO tKV I N WA(IIMAH , JR . I.AKE CO MM UNITY BANK.CUSTOM I K>M E BUI I.D bitS T lll E COM PANY a ud OLD R l•PUOI.I(' NA 1 IO NAL TITLE IN S\IR.ANC E COM l'ANYtbat tbn mapor plit &Dd titeSilf\'()' on •1h1Ch 1t II based were made m a«Ofdaoce \ll,•1th 1M :?0 11 M1n tmum Stand.'l rd Dclatl Rcqt1 11cmcnts for Al.f A/Af'SM Land T1tk:: S111,•cy:., Jotnll)' e~u,bhiohcd <11 ud ad,oplcd b y AL TA aud NSPS . The field work was rompletrd on J>ucabc'r I ll . 2012. Dated lbc 7th Jay of January, ?OD Da \•id U Pcmbm on , Prot'cs,,.iona l l..ll nd SurYCyOf ~·h nMSOta Lic:cn'iC 4()'44 TWP.1 17 • RGE .23 -SEC .06 HEN N EP IN COU NTY BOOK XXX/PAGE XXX ORONO, MIN NESOTA ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY IRVIN WACHMAN, JR., LAKE COMM UN ITY BANK C U STO M HOM E BU I L DERS TITL E, LLC OLD RE PU BLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSU RANCE CO. FIL E N O. 3 1202-070 RES TORATION NOT ES RES TORATION· 2.5 ACRES ' ' ' A RESTORE ALL Ot STURBEO AREAS WITH 4· TO 6. O F TO PSOIL, O R EXI STING O N.SITE ORGA NIC MTRL 8 SEED PO NO SLOPES ANO DETENTION A REAS W ITH MN/DOT 310 O R BWSR P8 SEED MIX AT A RATE OF 100 LBS.IACRE AND FERTILI ZE WI TH 20-0-10 A T 10 0 LBS.tA CRE. C. SEED A ll OTHER DISTURBED A REAS W ITH M NOOT 250 ANO SWSR SEED M I X FOR WETLANDS AT A R ATE OF 100 LBSJ ACRE ANO FE RTILIZE WI TH 2()..0.1 0 AT 100 LB SJACRE. {UNLE SS OTHE RWISE NOT ED) D ONLY P HOSPHOROUS FREE FERTILIZER IS TO BE USED O N SITE . E M ULCH WITH TYPE 1 A T A RATE OF 2 TONS/A CRE ANO DISC ANCHOR IMMEDI AT ELY AF TER P LACEMENT. USE WOOOF IBER B LANKET O N A LL SLOPES 3 :1 (FT) O R GREATER. F MAI NTAIN ALL SILT F ENCE UNT IL T URF HAS BEEN ES TA BLISHED. G RESTO RATION WORK Wil l BE COMPLETED W ITHIN 72 HOURS OF GRACI NG COM PLETIO N. 10 SILT FENCE, BEFORE GRADING-1,1 10LF SEPTIC F IELD PROTECTION. 865 LF AFTER G RADING · 525 LF (pond) 11 TREE FEN CE, BEFORE GRADING -250 LF "· SL~,..,c • 1,1 50SY I I i ii Vl :Jc 01 vi g IO --~~ --a: CD N u.J <{" i~- 0 ..:lig ~I ' "" ' (.)0 ii a: w fr--------~<~~/~~ ~ I, 0 ~ SYMBOL LEGEND LOT LI NE BUILDING SETBACK BOUNDARY PARCEL B OUNDARY LINE L DRAINAGE ANO UTILITY EASEMENTS F LARED ENO SECT ION W/RIP-RAP STORM STUCTURE LABEL WELL e SEPTIC S ITE E M ERGENC Y OVERFLOW S WALE SOIL BORING LOCATION BENCHMARK / FOUND IP • P RE CO NSTRUCTION SILT FENCE POST CONSTR UCTIO N SILT FE NCE \ ) OWNER: PETE R & SHARON RENNEBOHM PID#-0611 723210005 ., l \ l t1 --J I I \ .-II I JII ,1 .. ,s !il I I :3 D / WETLAND CONSERVATION EASEMENT + ,~ + I + + + l&Nt :~--> + + + J « ! zJ ,·9 + + + +O' i.. + + + JO~oO + + + + + + + + + + + + n ...... D + + + r .. I Vl Vl <{ a.. SEPT IC PROTEC TION FE NCI NG 4r I I I I TREE PRESERVATION EASEMENT OWN ER : W OOOF18ER BLANKET 0 1TCH CHECKS UTILIT Y POLE ON•SITE BMPS 1 NUAP POND • NURP PONO W ILL Be UTtUZEO TO MEET 0A: EXCEEOOUHJTY ANO RATE CONTROLREOUIREMEHTS 2. S.Ot,tMERS • THE PONO OUTLET STRUCTURE INCLUDES A SUBMERGED INLET PIPE TO~ S10M."1NG. 3 A:1f> RAP -Rlf> AAPWILL BE U TILIZED AT ALL APRONS FOR ENERGY OISSIPATIONANO PROVIDE SEDIMENT CONTROL 4 SLO PE STABILIZATION -SILT FENC E W'ILL BE INSTALLED Al.ONG OOVI/N GRAOIENT GRA04NG LIMITS ANO'hOOOFIBER BLANKET WILL BE UTILIZ ED ON All SLOPES 3:1 0 ~ G ~EATER T O PROVIOEAOEQUATE SLOPE STA81UZATlON. S BIOROlLS • BtOROLLS WILL BE INSTALLEO ALOHG REAR YARD SWALES TO PREVENT SEOOAE,~T FROM REACHNG »E N..RP PONOA.W ULTIMATELY OOWNSTREAM~ 0 INFILTRATIONIR E'TENTION AREAS -INFILTRATIONl'RETENTION AAEAS WILL BE UTIUZED TO REDUCE/RET""N ft.E RUNOFF FROM TH E INCREASED HAADSURFACE, 7 STREET SWEEPING • STREET SWEEP!~ WILL. BE DONE A MINIMU M OF ONCE PER WEEt<O R MORE FREOUEN T\.Y TO MINIY!ZE OUST CONTROL. ANO VEHICLE TRACKIJ'«'... 10 PHOSPHOROUS FREE FERTILIZER -PHOSPHOROUS FREE F ERTILIZER WILL ALSO BE USED ON SITE. Bayside Meadow P rotect Notes. OWNER : JAMES MOR GAN & DEBRA PULFOR D PID#-0 611 72.3 220022 l The hou se types and place me nt and proposed d rive w1 ya are for illustra tive purposes only. A do tailed certificate of aurve y w ill be pre pared for each lot , conform ing to the the City setback requirements . 2 Tree Cl ea ring w ill be required for the road a nd s tormwa ter pond construction. The re are treH shown in red, that ,llustrate t rees th at may be removed for the proposed hous.a a nd dnveway construc:tJOn The proposed house placement for L 1 &2 will be w ithin the existing on-srte tree cover 3 Off~Site gre dln9 will be required for th e private roed construct ion, the nece ssary g r&d ing e a seme nts w ill be o bta ine d o nce the pr0 Je e1 has prellm fnary pla t a ppro 11al, sin ce there maybe plan revis ~ns. 4 A monument is propos.d and a monumen t easement will be obtained 5 St re et -Rurel S•ction -SH Street Plan Sheet -D itch typteal sectJon 3 1 sk>pe 12' depth 1 3 ' Width 50 25 25 50 100 SC ALE IN FEET t--'D:..:E'-:Sc:IG,:'N:"E:;.R;_-f...;N..;;O:c....t-:'B':'Y-if-:'D::.:A:..:T.::E-!------"R.::E.;.V l~S::,10::.:N:;;S:__ ____ -l USE (I NCLUDING COPY ING , DI ST RIBUTION, ANDl'OR CONVE YANCE OF RSM RS.~ ~S.!!,_ _ _ SileLa)IDIA,-cty~ _ _ INFORA.iATION)OFTHISPROOUCT ISSTRICTLY PROHIB IT EO WlTHOUT I HEREBY CER TIFY TH A T THIS PLAN OR SPECIFIC A TION WAS P REPARED B Y ME OR UNDER MY DtRECT S UPERVISION .6NO THAT I AM A DULY REGIS TERED PROFESSION AL ENGINEE R UN DER THE L A WS OF THE S TATE OF M INNES OTA. DRAWN BY ____ -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ SATHRE..SE RGOUIST, INC ·, EXPRESS WRITTEN AU THO RIZATION. USE WITH OUT RSM SAID A UTHORIZATIO N CONSTI TUTES AN ILLEGITIMA TE U SE ANO SH ALL THERE8Y CHECK ED B Y ----------INDEMNIFY SATHRE -B ERG QUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILIT Y, SATH RE-BERG QUIST. INC RES ERVE S THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE D ATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONS IB LE FO R DAMAGES OR L OSSES RESULTING F ROM ILLEGITMATE use Robert S . Molsl~. P .E . Da te: Ol /tclD Lie. N o. Jd!:0...1 GE NERA L NOT ES· OWN ER: JAM ES & JULIE DZUB AY PI D#-061172322 0 0 23 ERIN SULLI VAN PID#-06 11 72 32 20024 1. IN STALL SILT FENCE A S S HOWN ON PLAN, AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF ORONO OR D IR ECTED BY THE ENGIN~ER 2. THE WAT ER QUALITY PO N O M U ST BE EXCAVATED AT THE BEGINNING OF GRADING OPERAT IONS TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY STORM W A TER OE TENTION DURING CONSTRUCTION SAND ANO S ILT MUST BE R EMOVED FRO M THE PONO A S N ECESSARY DURING CONSTR UCTION AND AT THE COM PLETION OF THE PROJECT. 3. BEGIN G R ADING , INST ALL PE RFORATED RIS ER P IPE tN PONDS WHE N PONO G RAD ING IS COMPLETE . TEMPORARY DRA INAGE P IPE SHALL BE USED FOR I NTERM EDIATE DRAI NAGE DU RING THE CO NSTRUCTION PERIOD AS NECESSARY AN D OJR ECTEO BY THE ENGINEER INST ALL SILT FENC E A ROUND EXCAVATED PONDS 4. IN S PECT P ONO, S ILT FE NC E , AND R OCK ENTRANC E B ER M AFTER ALL RAINFALL EVENTS AS REQUIR ED BY THE NPDES PERM IT 5. LINE All PONDS YflTH A MINIM UM 3· ORGANIC SOILS & SEED SLOPE S BE TWEEN NWL ANO 100 Y R HWL WITH A WATER TOLERANT M IX . (OR AS NOTED) 6. REM OVE PE RFORATED RISER PIPE WH EN STOR M SEWER AND OUTLET STRUCTURE FOR PONDS ARE INSTALLED 7. POND· 10:1 BENC H (1 FOOT)THEN 3:1 MA X 8. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR IS R ES PONSIB LE FOR All STORM WATE R IN SPECTIONS A CCOROING TO THE M PC.A STORM W A TER PERMIT. THIS INCLUDES BOTH WEEKLY INSPECT IONS AND INSPECTIONS DO NE AFTER A OS RAIN EV E N T A COPY OF THE INSP ECTION R EPORT MUST BE EMAILED TO TH E ENGINEE R ANO DEV ELOPE R ON A WEEKLY BA SIS 9 . THE CON TRACTOR SHALL PLACE AND MAINTAIN AN EFFE CTIV E SILT CONTROL DEV IC E. INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE RE MOVED WHEN R ESTORATION HAS BEEN ESTAB LISHED 10. ALL RET AIN1 NG WALLS Will R EQ UIRE A STRUCTURAL OESIGN. A B U ILDING PERMIT & A F IN AL INSPECTION REPORT 11 A 1·.2• C RUSHE D ROCK ENTRANC E BERM SHALL BE PLACED AT THE SITE ENTRAN CE. TO R EPLACE SILT FENCE:, ANO M IN IM IZE EROSION ON TO THE STREETS. THE ROCK BERMS SHALL BE THE W IDTH OF THE ENT RANCE AND 2 F EET H IGH WITH 4;1 SLOPES 12 T HE CONTRACTOR SHAL L MAINTA IN POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM THE BUILDING PAD A N D STREET AREAS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION 13. THE CON TRACTOR SHALL ATTEMPT TO PREVE NT S04L MATER IA LS FROM LEAVING THE SITE BY E ROSION ANO VEHICLE WHEE L T RACKING HE SHALL BE RESPONSIB LE FOR CLEANING OF STREET, BOULEVARD ANO U TI LITY FACILITIES THAT R ECEIVE ANY ERODED OR TRACKED SOIL MATERIAL OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS OR MA TERIAL. 14 EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE S HOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY THE CON TR ACTOR SH AL L DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCAT ION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITI ES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGR EES TO B E F ULLY RESPON SIB LE FOR ANY AND AL L OAMAGES ARISING OUT OF H t$ F At LU RE TO EXACTLY l OCATE AND PRESERVE ANY A NO ALL EX IST ING UTILITIES CITY PROJECT NO ~,..s S«9~<" PRELI MINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN FILE NO 31202-070 i "' i .. , Qo,,~"s \ "' ., $ p\.,..# SATH RE-BERG Q UI S T , INC . 150 SOUTH BR OADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 ORONO, MINNESOTA BAYSIDE MEADOWS GP I .. ~- ~ 9 DE Cl.) u >< ~ • i I :~ g ld l.J ~ ,:c () ~ ~ <:I ~ ,j ::: tiJ ~~ ~~ u .._, 50 25 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET SYMBOL LEGEND LOT LINE BUILDING SETBACK BOUNDARY ---- P ARCEL BOUNDAR Y LI NE DRAINAGE ANO UTILITY EASEMENT$ RIGHT -OF -WAY FLARED END SECTION W/RIP-RAP (I STORM STUCTURE LABEL m WELL • SEPTIC SITE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SWALE SOIL BORING LOCATION BENCHMARK/ FOUND IP • PRE CONSTRUCTION SILT FENCE POST CONSTRUCTION Sil T FENCE SEPTIC PROTECTION FENCING WOODFIBER BLANKET DITCH CHECKS UTILITY POLE PROFILE SCALE 60 30 30 60 120 SCALE IN FEET ··u.J \ ... ...-Cl: CD I') w <(N " jr::::i~ " ,• o--'-/ w<O 0 ~I "" UC ci:O:: w loc, :• ~ w ljJ l ' f: I' r' .J J ..__ W O f,5 t:>o f N WN L -I er c£: ;::i wo,..._ iii ~~- --- \ \ \ ,' ' I \ I / \\ ,, ,, , , \ ' I -/ LO#l'Olff.., ...... LGWfllCalflll'A• ..... ....... ,... N&alil'•tn.M ....... ··- \ - b u• .. ,5 I J---.CD~ES,:'l:,:GN7E::;.R:.....+.:.;N.::;.O-+-:'B:cY:-+-:D::.:A.:.;T.:;E-+----,-.,.....:R.:,E:.:V"'IScolO:;:N::,S ____ --l USE (INCLUDING COPYING. DISTRIBUTION, ANO/OR CONVEYANCE OF RSM RSM ~S-~ _ _ s. ~ pw Cly Conm..as _ _ INFORMATION ) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT DRAWN 8Y RSM CHECKED BY DATE 01 -15-13 SATHRE-BERGOUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. use WITHOU T SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE ANO SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC OF All RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC RESERVES T HE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILL EGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES O R LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMA TE USE ~ l J I s ~ I I :. I 11 i • t I ,.,. ......... ··-I I N &av•- U•-o-----=vc----ll H ill-vc ,n --- I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION 'WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANO THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESS10NAL ENGINEER UNCER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF M INNESOTA. Robert S Molstjld, P E Date: Ol/(C/{) Lie. No. 1--1,.'-fl.:l ---- SATHRE-BERGQ U IST, IN C. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN 55391 (952 )47 6-6000 I "' l I iii i __ ... _ "' I / / 1.5 " BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE · MNl'DOT SPV\€B240B (2360 SPECIFICATION) ~ 3 " &ITUMINOUS BASE COURSE· MNl'OOT SPN\NB230B (2360 SPECIFICATION) 8" C LASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE , MN/DOT 3138° GEOFABRIC, MN/DOT TYPE V, MIRAFI 500X , BOZ/SY NON-V'vOVEN APPROVED SUBGRADE DESIGN DATA: STREET SECTION : 1.5" SPWEB240B WEAR COURSE (MN DOT 2360) 2.5" SPNWB230B BASE COURSE (MN DOT 2360) s· CL 5 AGGREGATE BASE (MN DOT 3138) SUBGRA OE FABRIC (8 OZJSY. NON-WOVEN) (if requ,rfKI) (See Pevement Des,grl I R-Valu e Deslgrl. Haugo Geotechnicel 01-1 0-13) CITY PROJECT NO ORONO, M INNESOTA 6" (2' wkle) CL 7 AGGREGATE SH OULDE R CROSS SECTION · 3%CROWN HY PAVEMEN T WlOTH 2' AGGREGATE SHOULDER 3 ,1 DITCH S LOPE 2: TYPICA L DIT CH DEPTH 3' TYF>tCA L DITCH WIDTH INSTALL CULVERTS FOR EACH DRIVEWAY WITH HOME CO NSTRUCITON PRELIM INARY STREET PLAN BAYSIDE MEADOWS FILE NO 31202-070 •, ENTRY MONUMENT SEE SHEET2 I PLANTING BED SEE SHEET3 I I -----1 I I ::,.: I ~I u l I (/) I Cl'.'. I w I-I z ~ I n. ---i I ,.,. I I I I I I I I I I -l- I l I I I I I \ I I \i I I I 1 '1, ' ' l I -', I 'i-- : I I I I I I I I I \ \ 50 / / ' 25 I I I / / I I I I I t \ \ I 25 50 SCALE IN FEET t I I ' I I I I I I \ \ \ \ \ I - J 0 \ I I I I I I I I I ,-----/--, I I / § I I I I 1- 1 r -f--...i --, I I , I I I <> I I I / "< I I I / "'I I , L 1-----...J / I ,' ~ § f I I I r-l-\ - ,-i-+--- I I 6 ;:; ~ i I \ ' I I I \ I \ \ I \ I , I , ' ' \ \ \ ' \ I I \ 100 ' ~ INDICATES AREA OF BUCKTHORN REMOVAL ' ' NOTE: \ I I I I / / SEE INVASIVE SPEC IES REMOVAL CONTROL PROCEDURE FOR BUCKTHORN REMOVAL PREPARED BY KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SER ICES. ~==~D~ES:~tGN~E~R~::::::t ""'N"'~"-"+:T::~y'-cw+-=~'::.~:::'-T'c:~3:-+R""ev,..l"'se'"'E!"=cfty=oom=~=EV=:=:;:::c:.:IO;c~c.cs ____________ ---,~~~~~c~:~~~~;;':,~~~r:~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~;~~~TION) DRAWN BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE 10W CHECKED BY 10W DATE 01.2:1-13 WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION C ONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE ANO SHALL THEREBY INDEMNI FY NORBY & ASSOCIATES LANOSCAPE ARCHITECTS. INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. NORBY & ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS. INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEG ITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LO SSES RESULTING FROM ILL EGITMATE USE. I ~:.,,-;:;:.f:::'::! lco+~-.1-~.",.t ... __ ,, .• _._. -~~'Wb',~~ J I I \ ' ' ' TREE PLAN TING BASED ON 1 SHADE TREE PER 40' OF ROAD FOOTAGE. ROAD FRONTAGE =2270 L.F. TREES REOUIRED=57 Norby & Associates Landscape Architects, Inc. 100 Es s< Second S<=t Chaska, MN 553 18 (952)36 1-0644 OWNER: TRE E PRESERVAT ION EASEMENT / BRADLEY PASS ---- PI0#-0611723240001 :,..-------__ KEY COMMON NAME TREES AL l..sldeo 'Red Maple' BH Black Hills Spruce H.. """= Locust 'Sl<vtine' PE Princeton Elm RM Red Maple SM Suaar MaPie WP Wh~ePine CITY P ROJECT NO. ORONO, MINNESOTA / ,,,,.,,.,. // ---t -,,,.,,,.,,... // .,...""' .,,,.---<J!>&-______ _ B l)TAN ICAL NAME Ttiia americana 'Re:dmortd' Piecea alauca desnata Gleditsia tricanthos var inermis 'Skvffne' Uimus americana 'Prfnceton' A c errobumi ,leer sacchaflm Pinus strobus Total --- '-~-- <( / --.a.-_.,,,. / / / -- / I I I I I I I ' T I I I \ I \ \ I -' -' ~ :) Io, t-5 \ i ,~g 1 .\.~~ 5g, N i 'a'::: o '"' ol!o >-\ I w~ Ea: <.. I I w I \ ..., I \ i, \ \ \ I I I I I I I I ' \ ' \ l \ I \ I \ ' ' ' \ \ \ QUANTITY SIZE NOTES 7 2.5"BB strai;iht single leader 10 TBB 7 2.S"BB strai:lht sinale leader 12 2.S"BB strai:lht sina le leader 10 2.S"BB ...,.,ht sinale leader 8 2.5" BB straioht sil1ale leader 3 TBB 57 PRELIMINARY PLANT ING PLAN BAYSIDE MEADOWS FILE NO. 31202~70 1 3 / / \ \ \ \ I.A. I \ - I --( '\. ..L '-" . \ --( -------Precast Concrete Cap Stone Veneer ~!l-------Precast Concrete w/ sandblasted letters Precast Concrete Stone Veneer @ (ii) Entry Monument Concept Scale: ~"=1'-0" ., /. I 1---D::;E=:S::..:IG::..:N=:ER.:.......-+"'N0.:;;·4--!DW.=B.:..~-1-_-=2~"'~TEc::!._c..J-1-_-_-_-.-_-_--,-u"'~c.:ted::..:S::..:~;;.;N58,a.S __________ --; g:~~SC~~g~U~~~~T:C~~~T:~~~:~~e:v?i~~~=~;;.i~~~TION) I---D-RA__:TDc.:;.;.:.:....BY_-4- 1 ----------LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE TOW CHECKED BY TOW DATE 0 1-23-13 WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE ANO SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY NORBY & ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC. OF All RESPONSIBILITY. NORBY & ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY IUEGITIMA TE USER OR PARTY LEGAI.L Y RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LO SSES RESULTING FROM 11.LEGITMATE use. ...I.. I I ---- RETAINING WALL TOW: (1023.0) BOW: (1020.0) ' \ ' \ \ ' ' ' ' J ---- Entry Monument Site Plan 10 Norby & Associates Landscape Architects, Inc. 100 Esst Second Stn:<t Chuo, M N SS318 (9S2)361-0644 CITY PROJECT NO. ORONO , MINNESOTA \ 10 SCALE IN FEET 20 NOKI'H / \ PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN BAYSIDE MEADOWS FILE NO. 31202-070 2 3 3-REDMAPLE (SEE SITE PLANTING Pl.AN) DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MU LCH 4 •DEPTH 3 FIELDSTONE BOULDER CI) CUL-DE-SAC PLANTING PLAN 3 SCALE 1"=10'-0" 10 10 20 SCAlE IN FEET NOlfl'H t--"D-"ES"=IGCCN~Ec...R_-+-NO-·;--~BY--1_D_ATE~-+------REVIS='-"IONS"-------I use (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, ANO/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) lOW OF TH IS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT NORBY & ASSOCIATES OAAWNBY TOW CHECKED BY lOW DATE 0 1-2~13 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITIEN AUTHORIZATION. u se WllHOUT SAID ... UTHORIZATION CONSTITUTE S AN ILLEGITIMATE USE ANO SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY NORBY & ..SSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS. INC . OF "LL RESPONSIBILITY. NORBY & AS SOC IATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS. INC . RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGmMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RES UL TING FROM ILLEGITMA TE USE. ., I G) ENTRY PLANTING PLAN SCALE 1"=10'-0" 10 , ___ .,_c_ ........... __ . -=- 10 SCALE IN FEET I _...-- 20 NOlfl'H ; ENTRY PLANTING LEGEND COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME QUANTn PERENNIALS Au1\JT!n .!<rt Sedum Sedum x 'Autumn Jov' Goldsturm Rudbeckia Rudbeckia 'Goldsturm' Ka<1 Foonllor Grass Cefam8f1(0St/:s X ecutiflont J(atf Foftrste, Mavnlnht Salvia Salvia nemerosa 'Mainacht' t.t:x>nstwle YlllT<:HI Achilea 'Moonshine ' Ria.Ste11a0avlily Hemerocallis 'Rubv Stella' RuasianS""" Pervosk/a spp. NOTE: ALL TR EE PLANTINGS ARE FOUND ON SHEET 1 (PRELIMINARY Pl.ANTING Pl.AN) CllY PROJECT NO. 16 10 7 14 16 11 1 Norby & Associates Landscape Architects, Inc. ORONO, MINNESOTA 100 Es,t Sc<:ond Streel Chaska, MN 55318 (952) 36 1-0644 I _.-\.------------------- -----14-MAYNIGHT SALVIA ----- 10-§QLJ)STURMlfLJDBECKIA 11-RUBY STELLA OAYLJLY ,,c.,.,==...,:16-!.!:!!AUTUMN JOYSEDUM 16-MOONSHINE YARROW 1-RUSSIAN SAGE /~VINYL EDGING ~ / BOULDER WALL ---------DOUBlESHREDDED SIZE 1 aal 1""' 1 aal 1 aal 1 gal 1 aal 1aal NOTES HARDWOOD BARK MUL CH 4• DEPTH 7-AARL FOERSTER GRASS Plant 18" o .c. P1ant 18" O .C . Plant 30" O .C . Plant 18" O.C . Plant 18" O.C. Plant 18" O.C. Plant 36" 0 .C . I ----- PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN BAYSIDE MEADOWS FILE NO. 31202-070 3 3 t--0"-E"Sl=GN..;.E;cRc.._-l--'-NO"'-. +-8"-Y'-I-O"-A-'T'-'E'-1-------'R.::E:..cV.::IS:;.IO;cN_;;S:_ ____ ___. USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, ANO/OR CONVEYANCE OF RSM _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ INFORMATION)OFTHISPROOUCTISSTRICTLYPROHIBITEOWITHOUT DRAWN BY _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ SATHRE-BERGOUIST,INC.'1EXPRESSWRITTENAUTHORIZATION. USEW1THOUT RSM SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE ANO SHALL THEREBY CHECKED BY -----------INDEMNIFY SATHRE-B ERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SAT HRE -BERGQUIST, INC RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE DATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE use. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT TH!S PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANC THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENG INEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA Lie. No. lJtD../ SATHRE-BERGQU IST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (!l52) 47~ CI TY PR OJECT N O. ORONO, MINNESOTA SYMBOL LEGEND LOT LINE BUILDING SETBACK BOUNDAR Y PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE DRAINAGE ANO UTILITY EASEMENTS RIGHT -OF-WAY FLARED ENO SECTION W /RIP·RAP STORM STUCTURE LABEL m WELL • SEPTIC SITE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SWALE SOIL BORING LOCATION BENCHMARK I FOUND IP • PRE CONSTRUCTION SILT FENCE POST CONSTRUCTION SILT FENCE SEPTIC PROTECTION FENCING WOOOFIBER BLANKET DITCH CHECKS 1" = 70' 250' AERIAL SITE PLAN BAYSIDE MEADOWS FILE NO. 31202-070 C...to r-:--~-----------------------------------------------------------------, I I I I I I I I r.5 1 :_._; 11::': () I (!J I ,;:: I fl 1 I I I I I I I 4r I I I I I I /'' - V) :le a, u;g :co 1-N •. -li:!N 'ffi ~. z<r-----~':::'-o-'-~"' 0 ~I "" ' u o a1a:: \ w \ \ I I } ,, (j \ I OWNER : PETER & SH ARON RENNEBOH M PID#-06 1172321 OOQ5 -·----I I 1 '-} \ l rJ J I I .I b ,I \ \ i ' I I, -1 J II! .. , .. Iii I : ::i OWNER: JAMES MOR GAN & DEB RA PU LF ORD PI D#-061 1723220 0 2 2 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN F EET OWNER : AMERIC A N HOME M OR TGAGE PIOi-0 6 1172322 0 0 21 ._...;O:.;:E.;:;Sl.;:;GNc;:E:c;.R _l-""'-NO:;.;.. +_;B:..;Y-+-'D"-A-"'TE'-4-----"R"'-EV:.:.:IS::.:IO:.:.:N;:._S ------l USE (INCLUOING COPYING, O!STRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF I H ERESY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANO THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA . RSM RSM 02-08-13 Added~~ INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED W ITHOUT 0 ~: ev RS~ 02-l~t) ---~-~pwClyC-.. --~:~;=~~~~~~~~~N 1~g~·s~:u~~~SA~~~~~7r~i1~~~~~1i;sHUA~i :~~~~~ CHECKED BY DATE INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUI ST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY . S ATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC . R ESERVES THE RIGHT TO H OLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY R ESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE USE O WNER : J AM ES & JULIE OZU B A Y PID #-061 1723220023 SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC . 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN 55391 (952)47~ la I -----_I --·--I OWNE R: V) V) <( Cl. ERIN SULLI VAN PID#-06117232 200 24 CI TY PROJECT NO. ORONO , MINN ESOTA SITE CONSERVATION PLAN BAYS IDE MEADOW S FILE NO . 31202.070 CP 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET :::) I\ I ~ I• r:.-C> ("' /"\ i:> r:.-r:.-V 1 l'I 11 'I I L_ I \ 0 '--' I \ L_ L_ I , ------------------------- ( C0um:¥-R9A9-N@.-84J---B-A-Y-£IDE-R.OAD --- g . ! ___ -- ~// 30. oo 0 /9-0°1 s ·oo"~ ;EFFRE )017 OCKl w 0 0 0 G-J (D ..p. (D 0 0 ~ I o~ I y / !0«;, 0 EX\S1\NG HOUSE 245 .22 R=313.39 6=44°49'54" LOT 1 BLOCK2 FARMS I _L ~ u, I I I ! I I I I I I ! I o, I 61 0 1 1 I I I I I I NORTH TRAIL EASEMENT DESCRIPTION A trail easement described as follows: The North 10 .00 feet of Outlot B, BAYVIEW FARMS 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Area: 500 sf I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota Dated this 25th day of February, 2013. SATHRE -BERGQUIST, INC . Daniel L. Schmidt, Profess ion al Land Surveyor Minnesota Li cense No. 26147 C.. l I REVISIONS I-~ !;Q 0 (,/) I UJ z X z UJ ~ I-ci z z 0 UJ a:: ~ 0 UJ u. Cf) 0 <( >-f-UJ 0 ' DRAW/CHECK " DLS/RSM DATE 02/25/2 013 BOOK/PAGE NA JOB NO. 3120-070 DWG . NAME EAS EMENT S , Bayside Meadows Orono, Minnesota Invasive Species Management Plan Prepared for Bayside Meadows Homeowners Association by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (KES Project No. 2012-068) February 26, 2013 Council Exhibit D h ... vf:·, "t:D FEB 2 8 2013 CITY OF ORONO SUMMARY Bayside Meadows Orono, Minnesota Invasive Species Management Plan Bayside Meadows was approved by the City of Orono as a residential, Conservation Design project. A goal of the project was to enhance and preserve vegetation composition within undeveloped natural areas located on the site. This goal was to be accomplished through the protection of natural features and removal of invasive species. Per project approval, perpetual conservation easements for Bayside Meadows were recorded with the County and are included as Appendix A. There are three (3) conservation/preservation areas that will require annual management for invasive species (i.e. common buckthorn) and noxious weeds (Figure 1). The Conservation Easement area is a sloping meadow dominated by grasses. The Wetland Conservation Easement area is a grass dominated wetland buffer located above a grass dominated wetland . The Tree Preservation Easement area includes a sugar maple-basswood forest in the southeast part of the property, and a row of mature white pines along the west property line. Prior to turning over vegetation management obligations to the Homeowners' Association, the developer will remove invasive species for two growing seasons and complete all required plantings. In 2013 and 2014 invasive species removal and management will be (was) completed throughout the site by a qualified vegetation management professional contracted by the developer. This has prepared the site so that the Homeowners ' Association will be able to reasonably and effectively manage the site . The Homeowners' Association will take over the obligation of vegetation management in spring of 2015. Because soil s likely contained a seed bank of invasive species and because adjacent properties also contain invasive species, annual vegetation monitoring and management is required to prevent reinvasion by undesirable species. In addition to buckthorn removal , the developer has been managing to control other encountered noxious weeds such as garlic mustard , common burdock, and Canada thistle. Reed canary grass located within conservation easement areas does not require management. (Additional Note -Snags (standing dead trees or tree stumps with hollow cavities) can provide valuable wildlife habitat to a wide variety of birds and mammals and should left in place. Also, many of the larger living sugar maples in the very southeast portion of the site have numerous cavities and barred owl feathers were observed. These snags and trees should be left in place unless they pose a hazard.) Ba yside Meado ws In vas ive Spec ies Manage ment Pla n Page I of 3 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION MANAGEMENT PLAN This Invasive Species Management Plan below summarizes monitoring and management activities that should be performed by homeowners annually (starting in 2015) within conservation and tree preservation areas (Figure 1) within the Bayside Meadows development. Bayside Meadows Invasive Species Management Plan Sprint Mana2ement Activities The entire property should be walked. Invasive species seeds migrate onto sites via animal traffic and droppings, wind, and water. Identify re-sprouted (previously cut) buckthorn trees/saplings. Hand pull and discard in trash or take to City brush drop site. Herbicide treatment is not effective in spring. Replace protective tree wrappings with caging. If additional native trees or shrubs are identified, protect with caging. Note areas of other invasive species ( e.g. garlic mustard, common burdock, Canada thistle) and hand pull prior to seed dispersal to prevent a population from becoming established. Refer to fact sheets for species appropriate management technique. Fall Mana2:ement Activities The entire property should be walked. Invas ive species seed s migrate onto sites via animal traffic and droppings, wind, and water. Identify re-sprouted buckthorn trees/saplings. Spot treat with herbicide application (glyphosate or Brush-B-Gon), or hand pull and discard in trash or take to City brush droo site. Identify concentrate d areas of buckthorn seedlings (0-3 inches in height). Spot treat with herbicide application of glyphosate or Brus h-B-Gon. Note areas of other invas ive s pecies (e.g. garlic mustard, common burdock, Canad thistle) and hand pull prior to seed dispersal to prevent a population from becoming established. Refer to fact sheets for species appropriate management technique. G e nerally, effective removal of an established buckthorn population takes 5 or more years due to annual germination of seedlings from the existing soil seed bank. After successful invasive species removal from the first 2 to 5 years of active management, future management activities on the site should be greatly reduced. Prior to performing site management, it would be helpful to become familiar with the species that need to be managed. Fact s heets pertaining to the identification and management of s pecific invasive species previously observed on the site are included with this document (Appendix B). Also, as invas ive species are removed, previously existing native species will be "released" from dormancy. As new species emerge on the site, it will be important to correctly identify them as natives for preservation rather than invasives requiring re moval. Bayside Meadows Inv asive Species Management Plan Page 2 of 3 Specific identification or management questions should be directed to a knowledgeable Restoration Specialist ( contractor) who can assist the Association with identification, education, management, or on-site composting options or could be hired to perform this work for the Association. Additionally, the developer and/or the City of Orono can assist the association in finding a qualified contractor. ATTACHEMENTS Figures l -Site Conservation Plan Appendix A -Conservation Easement Documents Appendix B -Invasive Species Fact Sheets Bayside Meadows In vasive Species Management Plan Page 3 of 3 I I j I I I I 1r l ~! I ~ I J I "' 0 ~I z "I ~ t--,-- (:J I ~ "'I ~ l•J ,-- " 0 ~,, ~ I I h I I I 111/N I I 15.~E-I icr:: I I o;8 I .. .J,. I I I !~ I I I I ' ........ --..... 11~]02~~,j ___ ~eoo::=~ _ .... O~ER: PETER 6: SHA.RON RENNEBOHU WETt.AND COHSERVA.TION D PIOf-061172321 0005 EASEME~ :; < i i• f i ~ u. I i'" ; ;; i1 i!c::: a::~~ "'<~ !a~ ..... uo ffiit I I I I __ j_ I, II! ;i· ·, l ~ I J ii! ~ ~, $CALC IN rE'.t:T USC \NCluottG COPVING, DISTRlflUfJ:)ff,AN).()R COfM.YANCC Of'" HORMo\TION)OFn-sPROOUCTISSTRICll.Y~EC>WmiOI.IT $A~.&£ROOUIST,1NC."1EXPRESS'MOTTEN ....m<>RIU,l10N. IJSE.Wfl'HOUT $~,tJJTNORIVt.TlOf.j CatiSTTT\JllaSANI.LEGITIMATEUS£ANOSI-W.L ll4ER£8Y INMM~ SANR£-8EROOUIST. IMC. Of AU 1'tESPON$BUTY. S.-.~~T.INC. ftESER\ESniE~TTOl-tOLDNfVLLEGfTMlt.Tl: USER 0A PAA"f" lEG/1,1.LY RESPOHSIBLE FOR ONAAGESOR: LOSSES ~SU.TN:. FROM llLEGtTM.'1E USE. /# '4 ~ + i · + • + 1i /+ ,iHP~:,..,-t _..) + I .::~,ijs~" • r{t ----J --, tf.' '~~ '·1,ri I , • --+ '(/J'(., + + / + + 4(1) + + :+ + + • + ~ ' + + + + + + -M 1--;.--,,----c N ~ < "' ... ~ .,,..,., \J~ ;; \ .,...,,. ........ ;i. > \ .,.,...f!J ...... ,.....,,,,. ~,,,~-::,_-f\""'1 I ____ ,, ,~ .-~-" \ -;,~£~-... ~ ~ \.J,_-_:-_ -"" -~---\.---O'l -----,-----;:::-=-9Q --I I• j ~---'c J.---.,-, ::}i!:·= :i r .. r ~----x-ll~,/' ' i, ~ \~ j/,,.' \~ ""-~ _____ J _-f_-f_((~~~ //\ </ :,(;,~1' / 1-'I / / \ V ,..,,..( I l:}\ ,....-\ "' ,,. I /,~ \, (l/ _..,,., ~~Qr,-. 0 I ?:i O ,,, :i ;i 0 "b I 1· 0 o ~ ~ (,.{'~ • ', ~/0 ·;;; I ..i ~J::; 0 '¥'~, ) . - ""I i";-·'~.:J I I ' Qf l lm O I '~_I • r;;;-' · ,;'12..1 Ov.NER: Ai..ERICAN HOME MORTGAGE PIOl-0611723220021 J ~ I ~-.cl.;'.,, OWNER, JAUES & .A.JUE OZUBAY P10#·061172J220023 O'M"ER: ERIN SULLIVAN PIDl-0611723220024 ~ CON .. ~ ffi~~ i O.'.:, o~g ~..:. .,,o ;er ,c' <) :I i~ !!~ er~~ i<~ o~~ ,_ I Ii oi;-RE_jy Cl:RTFV 1ltA T THIS PL.AH OR SPECIF1C ... TIOH WAS PREP#IRED9VME OR IJt«JE:RM'f OlltEC! S~AI«> 1-....i,1 I "'MA OU..Y ~CCSl ldtt,O ~ESSIOfW. EHGl'EER UNOIER JHE LAWS CIF THE ST ... TEOFMll'fESOT"'- ~>-~ @ . . . ~ SATHRE-BER GQUIST, I NC. 150SOUTH8AO,o,l')"°'"'V W .. Y7Al .......... 56»1 ISG')47f.e000 ORONO, MINNESOTA SITE CONSERVATION PLAN BAYSIDE ME ADOWS ~::'!AA·"""'· l ie.Jc.~ Fll.lE f«>. 3 1202.tlTil APPENDIX A Conservation Easement Documents KjOUIAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY l'rovidi"l Sound, Balanud, ComJ>rthtruiw Natural Rtsauru Solutions COMMON/GLOSSY BUCKTHORN CONTROL PLAN Phase 1 -Initial Eradication (September and October) 1. Identify all buckthom with trunk diameter greater than 1.5" measured at ground level within the control areas. Chemically treat with glyphosate, Garlon or Rodeo using cut stump method or girdling. Mark cut stumps with colored wire flag. 2. Identify buckthorn saplings less than or equal to three (3) feet tall within the control areas. Treat saplings with foliar chemical treatment glyphosate, Garlon or Rodeo. Phase 2 -Extended Maintenance 1. Identify all new growth buckthom with trunk diameter greater than 1.5 " measured at ground level within the control areas. Chemically treat with glyphosate, Garlon or Rodeo using cut stump method or girdling. 2. Identify flagged stumps from Phase 1 and apply glypho sat e to stumps that have re- sprouted . Treat stump shoots with glyphosate, Garlon or Rodeo. 3. Identify new buckthom samplings less than or equal to three (3) feet tall within the control area. Treat saplings with glyphosate, Garlon or Rodeo. 4. Continue phase 2 methods for the life of the project which end s two years after the completion of construction. COMMON/GLOSSY BUCKTHORN CONTROL METHODS 1. The following methods are approved methods of removal and control. Any deviation from these methods needs to be approved by the owner's representative prior to their use. Method 1 -Foliar Chemical T reatment 1. Foliar chemical treatment shall be used on buckthom saplings less than or equal to three (3) feet tall. 2. Chemical spray shall be applied between the months of mid-September through October. Chemical spray shall not be u sed between March 15 and July 1. 3. Spray to wet all foliage of sapling s. 4. Use handheld or backpack sprayers with ultra-low volume nozzles to minimize contact with desirable existing plants . 5. Apply broadleaf chemical herbicide glyphosate, Garlon or Rodeo . 26105 Wild Rose L ane, Shorewood . Minneso ta 55331, Phone: 952-401-8757, Fax: 952-401-8798 Method 2 -Cut Stump Treatment 1. Cut stump treatment shall be used on buckthom with trunks greater than 1.5" measured at ground level. 2. Cut buckthom as close as possible to ground level and mark with colored wire flag for future identification and treatment. 3. Apply glyphosate, Garlon or Rodeo chemical herbicide to cut stump surface, bark exposed above ground, and roots exposed above ground using paint brush, wick applicator or low-volume sprayer. Glyphosate, Garlon or Rodeo chemical herbicide to be minimum strength of 10.0%. Method 3 -Girdling (Frill Cut) Treatment 1. Girdling treatment may be used on buckthorn with trunks greater than 3" measured at ground level. 2. Cut a frill around entire circumference of trunk as close as possible to ground level. 3. Apply glyphosate, Garlon, or Rodeo chemical treatment to entire frill cut and adjacent bark surface using paint brush, wick applicator or low-volume sprayer. Glyphosate, Garlon or Rodeo chemical herbicide to be minimum strength of 10.0%. HERBICIDE NOTES Garlon and Ortho Brush -B -Gon Active ingredient is Tryclopyramine. Mix with w ater for cut stump, frill , and foliar applications. Apply immediately after cut stump and frill. Glyphosate Glyphosate is the active ingredient in Roundup. Mix with water for cut stump, frill, and foliar applications. 10 to 20% active ingredie nt i s required for cut stump and frill methods . 3% active ingredient i s required for foliar application. Apply within 24 hours of the cut stump and frill. Water base d chemical. Rodeo is a glyphosate product for aquatic use. Use on plants within wetlands and within 10-ft of wetland edges. Use the same rate as outlined above for glyphosate. COMMOM/GLOSSY BUCKTHORN CONTROL PLAN -Page 2 of 2 Kjolhaug Environmental Services IMPACTS ON FORESTS 0 Out-competes m any tree seedlings and other native vegetation . 0 Adversely affect s native insect s and ot her wildlife. F I RST-YEAR PLANT S Garl ic musta rd is a bie n nial; it has a two-year li fe cycle . Seeds ger minate in April. Seedlings m e shown below. Note oak leaves fo r size compariso n. Leaves: Cl usters of 3-8 rounded to kidney- shaped leaves develo p at ground level during t he first growing season. They have scalloped edges, a wrinkled appemunce, a nd remain green all winter. SECOND-YE A R P LANTS Rowers: Small (1/4 inch), wh ite, 4 petals, on the e nd of the main stem and side branches, b looms April through June . (see top of page) Leaves: Heart-shaped to triangular, 1-3 inches wide, coarsely toothed on edges, alternate on the stem, give off a garlic odor when crushed. Height: Floweri ng stalks grow 1-4 feet toll. Roots : Taproot is slender, white, and often has an S-shoped ben d near the top. Seeds: Capsu les appear soon after flowering and q uickly lengthen. Seeds are small , produced in a row i nsi de th e capsule, and black when ri pe. More than 100 seeds per plant. SIM ILAR SPECIES II VIOLET leaves resemble first-year plants, but flower s bloom low and have S petals, lea f surfaces are less crinkly. No tap root. II GROUND IVY (creeping Charlie) spreads along the ground as a vine and has p urpl e flowers. CONTROL METHODS FOR GARLIC MUSTARD Control strategies must be applied fo r eight o r m o re years until the garlic mustard seed bank is deple ted. Methods may vary over time, depending on the extent of t h e invasion. Vulnerable areas, especially woodlands, should be monitored each spring to promptly detect new invasions and prevent re -occurrence. Mark areas where plants were found to aid in future monitoring. HAND PULLING For smaller infestations or where large groups of people a re involved, hand pulling \ 1, or digging garlic mustard can be effective. , v' If plants ore pulled or dug before budding .,t.: v' Use herbicides only when necessary. ALWAYS read the entire herbicide label carefully, following all mixing and application instructions. Wear recommended protective gear a nd clothi ng. WEED TORCH (FOR WET COND ITIONS ) Another method for spot-killing patches of newly germinated seedlings in spring is to "flame" them with a propane weed torch. Flames quickly kill tender seedlings, usually without permanently damaging nearby perennial plants. Use the weed torch cautiously, and o n ly when conditions are wet. ALWAYS contact your local fire control agency prior to using this method. Burning permits may be required. begins, they may be scattered aboul the . area to dry ou t, preferably off the •· ''.f-' PREVENTING FU RT HER SPREAD ground. Do not put pulled plants in ; '·\· ··,.. .~ piles where roots may stay moist a nd :' -~ r Clean shoes, pockets, pants cuffs and equipment development can continue. thoroughly after walking or working in inJested areas. ·.,Ji Garlic mustard seeds are tiny and are often carried off v' Once flowering has begun, all p lants / , .. , in clothing, shoes cmd m ud. must be bagged. Garlic mustard seeds :/1 ./: • .~ d 1 can still ripen after plants are . , ,..-· ' r Survey your area for green garlic mustar p ants. t d ' ( · t d · · ,; · ·· ,r Plants can be spotted any time they arc not covered uproo e . usmg energy s ore m , . . .. 'r/ \.> · 1 stems and leaves.) Pulled plants ~· :;' by fallen leaves or snow. may be put in plastic bags or large · :·-1· ·. ,· "' / v' When you find an infestation, remove plants that are paper bags. · 1 ' --,. • producing seed fir ·t, working fr om the least infested to v' Bagged plants should be d isposed of · · ! 11 the most infest ed area. Then remove other pla n ts, by b urning, b u rying deeply in an arc u , ; :"'· · again starting wit h the least infested areas . that will n ot be disturbed, or landfilling. v' Monitor non-infest ed wo o d lands carefully and (Please, do not burn plastic bogs.) Let garlic mustard freque n tly. Rem o ving one or t.vo plants before they co ll ected i n paper bags dry thoroughly before burning . go to seed is much easier than removing hundreds v' Do not co mpos t garlic mustard. Few compost piles or thousClnds la ter o n . prod uce enough hent to destro y ull garlic mustard seeds . v' To send bagged plants lo the landfill, label the bags as 'Invasive Plants -a p proved by DNR for landfilling'. CUTTING Cutting pla n ts a few inches above the soil surfoce just after the flower stalks have elongated but before th e flowers have opened can be effective in preventing seed production and may kill garlic mustard plants. However, som e plants m ny send out n ew flower stalks that require additional cutting. Monitor site regularly. H ERBICIDES v' Extensive infestations -if too large fo r manual methods -can be con t rolled by using a l % or 2% solution of glyphosate (there ore many brands). Appl y to the foliage of individual plants and dense patches in fa ll and/or very early spring. At these times most native plants are dormant, but garlic mustard is green and vulnerable. Gl yphosate is a nonselective h erbicide that will kill or injure all green non-tctrget plants. Use caution during appli-cat ion , and spray so that herbicide neither drips from the garlic mustard leaves o r drifts ont.o a djacen t desired vegetation. WEBSITES HTTP!//TNCWEEDS.UCDAVIS,EDU/ESADOCS/A.LLIPETl ,HTML An extensive summary o f i nfortn(ltion about garlic mustard. The Nature Conservancy also h as information o n man y o ther invasive pla nts. HTTP://DNR.WI.GOV/INVASIVEs/F'ACT/GARLIC,HTM A summary of garlic mustard i nformation from the Wisco nsin DNR , with links to other sites. HTTP://WWW,BOTANY,WISC,E DU/WISFLORA Photos and information on all Wisconsin plants. CREDITS This fact.sheet is based o n the brochure: Garlic Mustard - A Major Threat to \Visconsin 's Woodlands. b y Paul Hartman and Sharon Morrisey, Univ. of Wisconsin-Ex tension, 2002. It was revised by Colin Keily, David Eagan, Eunice Padley, Kelly Kearns, and Colle€n Matula, WONR, 2006. PUB-FR-350-2006 .KjOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY Providing Sound, &lanad, ComJ>rrhrnsivt Natural Ruourct Solutions GARLIC MUSTARD CONTROL PLAN Phase I -Initial Eradication l. Late spring to early summer: Identify/confirm garlic mustard presence in wetland, wetland buffer, woodland/forest areas "control areas". Mow/cut all areas covered with garlic mustard. A void compacting soils through weed whacking where possible. 2. Late fall: When native plants are dormant, and garlic mustard seed pod are not yet mature, chemically treat identified areas with glyphosate or Rodeo. Avoid compacting soils through hand-held or backpack sprayers where possible. Phase 2 -Extended Maintenance 1. Early spring and late fall of following year, identify new garlic mu stard within control areas. Spot-treat with glyphosate or Rodeo . 2. Continue as de scribed above for the life of the project which ends two (2) years after the completion of construction. GARLIC MUSTARD CONTROL METHODS 1. The fo llowing methods are approved methods of removal and control. Any de v iation from these methods needs to be approved by the owner's representative prior to their u se. Broadleaf chemical treatment 1. Chemical spray shall be applied between the months of March through April and mid- September through October when native species are generally dormant. 2. Spray to wet all foliage. 3. Use hand-held or backpack sprayers with ultra-low volume no zzles to minimize contact with desirable existing plants . 4. Apply broadleaf chemical herbicide glyphosate or Rodeo. 26105 Wild Rose Lane, Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 , Phone: 952-401-8757, Fa x: 952-401-8798 HERBICIDE NOTES Garton and Ortho Brush-B-Gon Active ingredient is Tryclopyramine. Mix with water for cut stump, frill, and foliar applications. Apply immediately after cut stump and frill. Glyphosate Glyphosate is the active ingredient in Roundup. Mix with water for cut stump, frill, and foliar applications. 10 to 20% active ingredient is required for cut stump and frill methods. 3% active ingredient is required for foliar application. Apply within 24 hours of the cut stump and frill. Water based chemical. Rodeo is a glyphosate product for aquatic use. Use on plants within wetlands and within 10-ft of wetland edges. Use the same rate as outlined above for glypho sate. GARLIC MUSTARD CONTROL PLAN -PAGE 2 OF 2 Kjolhaug Environmen tal Services 2/26113 Canada thisUe-lnvasiw species : Minnesota DNR Canada thistle ( Cirsium arvense) Description: Appearance: Perennial herbaceous plant, 2 -5' tall with slender grooved stems that branch only at the top . It has male and female plants. Leaves: Alternate, smooth, oblong, tapering, and directly attached to the stem, deeply divided, with prickly margins. Flowers: Numerous small purple flowers appear on top of the upper branched stems between June and September. Seeds: Small light brown seeds are tufted for dispersal by the wind. Seeds remain viable in the soil for over 20 years. Roots: Each plant has a fibrous taproot with wide spreading horizontal roots. Each small section of root can form a new plant enabling the plant to spread vegetatively. Ecological Thre at: • Canada thistle invades natural areas such as prairies, savannas, glades and dunes if some degree of disturbance already exists. It also invades wet areas with fluctuating water levels such as streambanks, sedge meadows and wet prairies. • Once it has established itself it spreads quickly replacing native plants, diminishing diversity. It grows in circular patches spreading vegetatively through horizontal roots which can spread 10 -12' in one season. • Canada thistle occurs throughout the northern U.S. from northern California to Maine and southward to Virginia and in Canada. • It has been declared a noxious weed in 43 states as one of the most tenacious agricultural weeds. • Canada thistle is a MDA Proh ibite d n oxio u s w eed < Co ntro ll ed Li st} in Minnesota. www.dnr .state.rm.us/invasi ws/ter restr ialplants/herbaceous/canadathi sUe.htrri 1/2 2/26113 Canada this tle -lnvasiw species : Minnesota DNR Control Methods: Mechan ical Repeated pulling and mowing will weaken roots, mowing when flower buds are just to open Late spring burns May/June are most detrimental, but also stimulate seed germination ; burn consecutively for 3 years C h emical Spot app li cation with glyphosate or with selective herbicide clopyralid, or mets u lfu ro n Biological Stem weevil , bud weevil and stem gall fly are commercially available Native Substitutes: • B lue g ia nt h yssop (Agastache foeniculum) • Purp le p r a irie clover (Dalea purpurea) • Can a d a t ic k trefoil (Desmodium canadense) • Ro u g h blaz ing st a r (Liatris aspera) • Wild be r ga m o t (Monarda fis tulosa) Additional Resources • Vid eo o n Can a d a thistle id e ntificat io n (Unive r sity o f Wisco n si n ) • M inn esota Departme nt of Agric ultu re Th istle I den t ificatio n • Can a da Thistle Fact Sheet (MDA) !PDF ! !Ex u • M i nne sota Noxio us W e eds (MN DOT) i PoF I n x,1 • Minnesota De p a rtment o f A g ric ulture T h is tle Biocontro l • Unive r sity of Minnesot a Exten sion • North Da kota De p t. of A g r iculture Fact S h eet • US Forest Service Fact S h eet • Pla n t Con ser vat io n Allia n ce Fact S h eet • I nvasive a nd N a tive Th istle Ide nt ificatio n (South Da k o t a St a t e Unive r sity) lPDF I www.dnr .state.rnn.us/i nvas iws/terrestri alpl ants/her baceous/canadathi sUe.htm 212 FWG invasive plant fact sheet Common Burdock (Arctium minus) Common Burdock, a member of the Compositae family, is a plant of open, sunny, disturbed sites: roadsides, rail tracks, old fields, meadows, and forest edges. While it grows best on moist fertile soils it tolerates various conditions. It cannot withstand repeated cultivation. Although described as a biennial, burdock is really a short-lived perennial (a "facultative" biennial). • A basal rosette and deep taproot grow in the first year. Flowering can take up to 5 years depending on site conditions, but once this occurs the plant dies. Burdock can grow more than 2.5 metres in height. • Triangular leaves are broad, coarse, alternate and resemble those of rhubarb. Flower heads consist of a thistle-like bur with spiny bristles topped by a cluster of small purple florets. The flowers grow in the leaf axils and the tip of branches, either singly or in small groups. Flowering is from mid-July through late summer. • The prickly seed-bearing burs readily attach to anything brushing against them, thus ensuring widespread seed dispersal. Studies show an average of 100 burs per plant, each bur containing approximately 40 seeds. However, other studies suggest upwards of 15,000 seeds per plant are produced. Seeds generally mature by September and are spread throughout the winter and spring. Various insects pollinate burdock, particularly honeybees, bumblebees and leaf-cutting bees. Burdock reproduces only by seed. • Studies variously indicate a seed survival rate of from 2 to IO years. • Although native to Eurasia, burdock is now naturalized throughout North America where it has been known for over 250 years. Control Be very careful about disposing of burdock seeds that have hitched a ride on you or your pet! • Removing all flower heads including those in the leaf axils, has proven relatively effective. However, buds can re-form after cutting so monitoring is essential. • Cutting back the first year basal rosette and digging out the taproot has been shown to have a good degree of success. However, some studies report that new plants will grow from any root left in the ground. • Removal of mature burs is difficult but effective . Burs must be bagged and disposed of. • There is no known bio-control agent for burdock at present, although a moth, Metzneria lappella , has been shown in some studies to reduce the viability of burdock seeds. ©Fletcher Wildlife Garden 613-234-6767, fletcher@ofnc.ca . www.ofnc.ca/fle tch er.php Text and photos: Christine Hanrahan Council Exhibit E @ E3C>LTC>N & ~ENK, INC® Consulting Engineers & Surveyors 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Phone (952) 448-8838 • Fax (952) 448-8805 March 6, 2013 City of Orono Attn: Melanie Curtis PO Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 RE: Preliminary Plat Application 13-3591 www.bolton-menk.com Bayside Meadows (formerly Outlot C, Bayview Farms 2nd Addition) Engineering Review #2 Dear Melanie: As requested, we have completed an engineering review of the documents submitted for the above referenced project. Our current review is based on the following submittal items: • Subdivision Application; dated 1/23/13 • Resolution Approving Preliminary Plat of Bayview Farms 2nd Addition, dated I 0/24/94 • Resolution Approving Final Plat of Bayview Farms 2°d Addition, dated 11/14/94 • Resolution Approving Lot Line Rearrangement of Properties, dated 2/12/96 • Development Narrative prepared by Coffman Development Services, dated 1/23/13 · • Storm water Management Plan prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, dated 1/17 /13 • Geotechnical Memorandum prepared by Haugo Geotechnical Services, dated 1/10/13 • Wetland Delineation Report prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental, dated 10/22/13 • Natural Resources Inventory Memorandum prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental, dated 1/22/13 • MCWD Approval of Wetland Boundary and Reclassification, dated 1/17/13 • Preliminary Plans prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, dated 2/15/13 o Preliminary Site Plan o Existing Conditions Plan o ALTA Survey o Preliminary Plat o Preliminary Grading and Erosion Control Plan o Preliminary Street Plan o Preliminary Planting Plans (3 Sheets) o 250' Aerial Site Plan o Site Conservation Plan • Conservation Design Report memorandum prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental; dated 2/6/13 • Invas ive Species Management Plan prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental; dated 2/26/13 • Engineering Review #I comments responses prepared by Sathre-Bergquis t, dated 2/15/13 We offer the followin g observations, comments, and recommendations for your consideration: 1.0 GENERAL: 1.1 Drainage calculations for the proposed s tormwater pond currently meet City requirements. Proposed runoff rates will be restricted to less than existing runoff rates . However, plan revisions ® Preliminary Plat Application 13-3591 Bayside Meadows Page 2 may affect peak discharge rates. Therefore, a Final Stormwater Management Plan should be submitted with the Final Construction Plans. Also, an outlet control structure detail should be included with the Final Plans. 1.2 Drainage calculations must be submitted as part of the Final Plans to confirm sizing of all culverts. 1.3 As part of the Final Plans, Drainage and Utility easements must be placed over the wetland, wetland buffer, stormwater pond, and all ditching and culverts directing runoff to the pond or wetland. The easements should be shown on the Final Plat and Final Street, Utility, and Grading Plans. 1.4 The estimated cost of proposed street and utility improvements must be submitted as part of the Final Plat process for determination of the total Letter of Credit amount. A Letter of Credit written to 150% of cost of improvements must be submitted prior to any land disturbing activities. 1.5 New development triggers the wetland protection ordinance requirements. Therefore, the following should be considered: a. This wetland is li sted as a "management 2" wetland in the MCWD's Functional Assessment of Wetlands inventory, which requires a 25 foot buffer and 20 foot structure setback. The proposed buffer exceeds and the setback meets City requirements. b. The invasive species listed in the Wetland Delineation Report have been included for control in the Invasive Species Management Plan. c. Wetland Buffer markers are indicated on the plan in accordance with City requirements, at the upland boundary of the buffer edge located at lot lines and changes of buffer edge direction and spaced a maximum 200 feet apart. d. Estimated landscaping costs for vegetation management and buffer establishment will need to be submitted for determina tion of total Letter of Credit amount a s part of the Final Plat process . e. Approved WCA wetland delineations must be provided to the City in a hard copy format as we ll as a CAD or GIS format using Hennepin County coordinates. 1.6 Payment of park dedication fees must be submitted to the City prior to Final Plat approval. 1.7 The Home Owne r s Agreement (HOA) doc ume nts s hould be s ubmitted for re view prior to Final Plat approval. The following items should be included : a. Road Maintenance Plan b. Pond Maintenance Plan c. Monument Maintenance Plan d. Invasive Species Control 1.8 The applicant will be required to obtain Hennepin County approval and permitting for connection to County Road 84 and installation of the culvert in County Right-Of-Way . A copy of any approvals or permits required should be submitted prior to Final Plat Approval. 1.9 The applicant will be required to obtain Minnehaha Creek W aters hed District (MCWD) approval and perm itting for erosion co ntrol. A copy of any approvals or permits required should b e s ubmitted prior to Final Plat approval. Since the development i s proposi ng les s than 20% impervious surface, no stormwater management permitting from MCWD should be required. 2.0 SITE PLAN: 2.1 Per the City of Orono's Resolution No. 3492 approving the plat of Bayview Farms 2°d Addi tion and the agreement between Owners, the dri veway location for 4665 Bayside Road should b e revis e d onto the private road and the access to Bayside Road e liminated. 2.2 Protection fencing is shown to be ins talled around potential septic areas to ensure they are not impacte d by construction. The protection fencing locations s hould be inspected and approved by the City Engineer prior to any land disturbing activities. ® Preliminary Plat Application 13-3591 Bayside Meadows Page 3 3.0 PRELIMINARY PLAT: 3.1 One variance will be required for the proposed plat: a. The length of the cul-de-sac (1053') exceeds the maximum allowed ( 1000' ). 3.2 The Conservation Master Design Report memorandum indicates conservation easements should be placed over the tree stands located in the southeast comer of the site and along the west property line. It also indicates that a conservation easement should be placed over the sloping grassland located north of the existing wetland. These easements are shown on the Site Conservation Plan and should be recorded with the Final Plat process. 3.3 Outlot A of this proposed plat (Bayside Meadows) requires a road and utilities easement over the entire area. The easement should be generated using the standard city form and recorded as part of the Final Plat process. 3.4 A 10' trail easement abutting Bayside Road has been indicated on the plans. The proposed trail easement should be recorded with the Final Plat process. 4 .0 GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN: 4.1 A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will need to be submitted as part of the Final Plans. The SWPPP should include a project narrative, erosion control notes, erosion control installation schedule, erosion control maintenance schedule, pollution prevention notes , location and detail s of proposed erosion control devices. 4.2 Grading for road construction is proposed onto Lot 1 Block I and Lot I Block 2 of Bayview Farms 2"d Addition . Construction easements should be obtained from each lot owner for this work and submitted to the City for review. 5.0 PRELIMINARY STREET PLAN: 5.1 The proposed street section design meets the recommendations outlined in the Geotechnical Report and City standards. 6.0 PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN: 6.1 Tree calculations should be shown on the Planting Plan. One shade tree is required for every 40' of road fronta ge. 6.2 Tree pre se rvation and removal s hould be included with the Planting Plan so the extent of tree clearing can be field verified. 6.3 Additional, similar native trees to be planted along the entire so uthern property boundary have been added to the Planting Plan. Final loc ation s and species s hould be reviewed prior to Final Plat approval. Date Application Received: 01/23/13 Date Application Considered as Complete: 02/06/13 120-Day Review Period Expires: 04/07/13 To: From: Date: Chair Schoenzeit, Planning Commission Members Jessica Loftus, City Administrator Melanie Curtis, Planning & Zoning Coordinator 11 February 2013 Council Exhibit F Subject: #13-3591, Ervin Wachman, Outlot C, Bayview Farms 2"d Addition (also Outlets B & D) PID 06-117-23-22-0018 (plus PIDs 06-117-23-22-0012 & 06-117-23-22-0014) Preliminary Plat -Bayside Meadows Public Hearing Zoning District: Existing Lot Areas: RR-lB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acre/200' width) 13.01± acres dry + 0.71 + acres wetland 13.72± acres total Application Summary: This application contemplates preliminary plat approval to create five new, 2+ acre buildable lots and a private road from the original 13± acres. l. Lot 1 is proposed to contain 3.48 acres total; 2.79 acres dry, buildable and 0.69 acres wetland. 2. Lot 2 is proposed to contain 2.26 acres total; 2.25 acres dry, buildable and 0.009 acre wetland. 3. Lot 3 is proposed to contain 2.63 acres total dry, buildable area. 4. Lot 4 is proposed to contain 2.18 acres total; 2 .03 acres dry, buildable and 0.15 acre storm pond . 5. Lot 5 is proposed to contain 2.16 acres total; 2.12 acres dry, buildable and 0.04 acre storm pond. All of the lots would be served by a new private road with cul -de-sac extending southerly from Bayside Road (CSAH 84). All lots would be served by private septic systems and private wells. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the planning commission review all of the issues identified within the report and provide direction to the applicant. Staff recommends tabling the application to allow the applicant to address the known issues. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Exhibit D. Exhibit E. Exhibit F. Exhibit G. Exhibit H. Exhibit I. Application Development Narrative Alta Survey 01/07 /13 Existing Conditions Plan 01/15/13 Preliminary Site Plan 01/15/13 Preliminary Plat 01/23/13 Preliminary Grading & Erosion Control Plan 01/15/13 Preliminary Street Plan 01/15/13 Preliminary Planting Plan 01/23/13 a. Entry Monument Site Plan 01/23/13 b. Cul-de-Sac & Entry Planting Plans 01/23/13 Aerial Site Plan 01/15/13 Exhibit J. Exhibit K. Exhibit L. Exhibit M. Exhibit N. Exhibit 0. Exhibit P. Exhibit Q. Exhibit R. Exhibit S. Exhibit T. Exhibit U. Exhibit V. Exhibit W. Exhibit X. Exhibit Y. Exhibit Z. Exhibit AA. Exhibit BB. Exhibit CC. Exhibit 00. Exhibit EE. Site Conservation Plan 02/06/13 Site Photos Aerial Photo Conservation Design Report 02/06/13 Wetland Delineation Report 10/22/12 MCWD Notice of Decision 02/01/13 Mn RAM Assessment -Reclassification 01/17 /13 City Engineer Review Comments 02/07 /13 Hennepin County Review Comments 02/12/13 Hennepin County Assessor Comments 02/12/13 Road Curvature Diagram City Code Excerpts Summary of Estimated Fees 2013 Fee Schedule (excerpts) Resolution No. 3483 -Preliminary Plat Bayview Farms 2nd Addition Resolution No. 3492 -Final Plat Bayview Farms 2nd Addition Lot Area Exhibit (received 02/12/13) Revised Preliminary Site Plan 02/11/13 (received 02/12/13) Staff Sketch -Bayview Farms/Bayview Farms 2nd 2008-2030 CMP Map 4E-3: Comprehensive Trail System Plan Cristofori Circle Exhibit Exhibit FF. Property Owners List Exhibit GG. Plat Map Exhibit HH. Letter from Irvin Geffre 02/14/13 PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW Conformity with 2010 -2030 Orono Community Management Plan #13-3591 11 February 2013 Page 2 of 7 The proposed subdivision is in co nformity with the guiding of this area for single family rural residential development at a maximum density of 1 unit per 2 acres. The propo se d development generally conforms to the 2.0 acre dry-buildable, 200' width standards of the RR-lB Zoning District. Relationship to Surrounding Development The proposed single -fa mily deve lopment with 2-plus acre lot sizes is consistent with existing development in the surrounding neighborhood. The surrounding properties vary in size from 2 to 20+ acres. Conformity with Zoning District Lot Requirements The property is located in the RR-18, One Family Rural Residential District, which allows for single family rural residential uses with a minimum lot size of two dry buildable acres. Each proposed lot meets the minimum requirement of 2.0 acres of dry buildable land. General Site Characteristics The site to be platted as "Bay side Meadows" is currently a vacant field containing open areas identified as a hayfield and meadow, a wetland, and a wooded area along the south and southeast portions of the property. A wetland delineation ha s been conducted and has been shown on the survey; the 30,896 square foot (0.7 acre) wetland has been recla ss ified from a Preserve classification to a Manage 2 classification. The City has re ce ived a copy of the delineation and of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval of the delineation and the reclassification. #13-3591 11 February 2013 Page 3 of 7 A storm water pond is proposed to be created to address stormwater resulting from the new hardcover of the development. The storm water pond will straddle the common lot line between proposed Lots 4 and 5 with outlet pipes directing overflow water under the proposed private road into the ditch and wetland on the east side. The area taken up by the storm water pond has been deducted from the dry buildable acreage of each lot. History Bayview Farms and Bayview Farms 2nd Addition were platted in preparation for allowing the current Outlot C (Bayview Farms 2nd) to be developed with additional building sites. Outlot B and Outlot D Bayview Farms 2nd Addition were created specifically in 1994 for the purpose of providing access for the future development of Outlot C. It was the City's intent at the time of the Bayview Farms 2nd plat approval that future development of Outlot C would require the relocation of the driveways serving the two existing, adjacent homes onto the new private road. The future driveway re-location was a condition of the plat approval. Agreements detailing the driveway re-location requirement are part of the approval resolutions for Bayview Farms 2nd Addition (attached as Exhibits Y & Z). An additional new outlot, shown as proposed Outlot A, will be platted for the purposes of constructing the private road with cul-de-sac and connecting to Bayside Road. The adjacent homes are currently owned by Irvin and Marjorie Geffre (4665 Bayside Road) and Eric and Elizabeth Sims (4645 Bayside Road). Sims is a new owner since 2000; Geffre participated in the Bayview Farms 2nd plat and signed the agreements attached to the plat resolutions. Geffre indicated they would relocate their driveway accesses upon the development of Outlot C. The current plan reflects connection of the Sims driveway to the new private road; the Geffre driveway is not proposed to be relocated. Hennepin County provided comments on this proposed plat which support the past understanding regarding the driveway relocation for both the Geffre and Sims properties, attached as Exhibit T. Lot Layout and Lot Standards The property is situated south of Bayside Road otherwise known as County State Aid Highway 84 (CSAH 84) and accessed via a platted SO-foot corridor between the Geffre and Sims properties. According to the RR -lB Zoning District standards, all of the lots must contain 2.0 dry acres and meet a 200' width requirement at the road frontage as well as 50' principal building setbacks. The proposed lots lay out as follows: Proposed Lot 1: Proposed Lot 2: Proposed Lot 1 will have 2.79± acres dry land (excluding 30,189 square feet of wetland). This lot is proposed to be the largest overall with a total of 3.48 acres but the proposed tree and conservation easements, wetland, wetland buffer, buffer setback and the proposed road location result in limited options for building sites. This lot is proposed to have 784± feet of frontage along the private road. Most of the site's Manage 2 wetland is situated on this lot centrally along the eastern side. There is a sufficient buildable envelope available, and all of the required RR-1B district lot line setbacks can be met. Lot 2 has 92± feet in width at the cul-de-sac, and ±180 feet in width at the principal building setback, contains 2.25± dry acres in area. There is a very small portion of the Manage 2 wetland on the northeast corner of the property; a 30 foot wetland buffer is shown surrounding the wetland. Tree preservation Proposed Lot 3: Proposed Lot 4 Proposed Lot 5 #13-3591 11 February 2013 Page 4 of 7 easements are proposed on the eastern half of the property as well as a portion across the southern lot line of the property to protect and preserve the existing tree stand. All required RR-18 setbacks can reasonably be met when this lot is developed with a new home. The septic treatment sites are located out of the tree preservation area. Lot 3 is proposed to have 110± feet in width at the cul-de-sac, and ±220 feet in width at the principal building setback, contains 2.63± dry acres in area. It appears all required RR-18 setbacks can reasonably be met when this lot is developed with a new home. Tree preservation easements are shown along the southern and western property boundaries. Lot 4 is proposed to primarily front along the private road with a small portion accessing off the cul-de-sac. It is proposed to have 2.038± dry acres; it will have 298± feet of frontage on the new private road. The storm water pond makes up approximately 0.15 acre of this lot. All required RR-18 setbacks can reasonably be met when this lot is redeveloped with a new home. This lot will also have a tree preservation easement along the western, rear lot line. Lot 5 is proposed to contain 2.12 dry, buildable acres and 1,958 square feet of storm water pond. A tree preservation easement is proposed over the western and northern portions of the property. Road Layout and Standards The applicant is proposing to plat Outlot A to create a private road with a cul-de-sac. An access permit is required from Hennepin County in order to relocate the access and create the private road. The Subdivision Ordinance and the CMP require a SO-foot corridor and a 100 foot cul-de -s ac for a local private road. Street design information was submitted with the application materials and has been reviewed by City Engineer. The proposed paved width of the private road is shown as 20 feet where the Code requires 24 feet for 3 to 6 homes. A variance from the minimum paved width requirement would be necessary. The cul-de-sac is proposed to be 120' feet in diameter with a 24-foot paved width; a 47 - foot landscaped center is proposed. Due to the location of the existing outlots connecting Outlot C to Bayside Road, the applicant's road design is proposed with a 100 foot curve radius which exceeds the City's minimum curve radius of 275 feet. The grade of the road in this area is approximately a ±13% slope; the recommended grade should not to exceed 12% [City Code 82-281 (e)]. The angle of the access and the steepness of this part of the property create an unfavorable and potentially unsafe situation for the roadway. The applicant has provided an exhibit to illustrate how the City's curve requirements impact the site layout. The Planning Commission should consider driving on Cristofori Circle before Tuesday's meeting; Cristofori Circle has a radius that is approximately 125 feet and the slope is around 10%. Keeping in mind, Cristofori Circle is not as extreme as what is being proposed but it has a similar slope and curve radius to get a real life feel for the road that is being proposed. Staff recommends the applicant redesign the road and lot lay out to better address the City Engineer's concerns regarding the road design. The applicant proposes to post the road "no parking" on the east side and install signage regarding the steep curve of the road. James Van Eyll our Fire Marshal has reviewed the plans had the following comment: According to Appendix D of the 2007 Minnesota State Fire Code, regarding Fire Apparatus #13-3591 11 February 2013 Page 5 of 7 Access Roads, a minimum of a 26-foot wide paved road and a 96-foot diameter cul-de-sac is required, or the homes served must be equipped with fire suppression sprinklers. The applicant will need to address how the City's standards and Fire Codes will be met. The developer will be required to submit maintenance covenants for recording with the plat which address on-going maintenance and upkeep of the private road. Rural Oasis, Conservation Design & Woodland Impacts The property has an area of existing woods in the southeastern portion of the property and along the wetland edge. A row of trees has been established along the southern and western boundaries of the property. Tree preservation easements are proposed. The Rural Oasis Study and Conservation Design Master Planning process has been formulated to help determine on a case-by-case basis what natural values should be preserved . This project triggers the need for the developer to conduct and submit a conservation design plan. A Conservation Design Report dated February 6, 2013 has been conducted and submitted by Kjolhaug Environmental Services (KES) for review. The applicant via the KES memo indicates that invasive species are primarily identified in the southeast portion of the site. Because many of the invasive trees (and identified diseased or dying trees) are located in a potential building site the KES plan indicates that the removal of invasive species will be the responsibility of the individual land owner(s). Staff would comment that the most effective trigger for inva sive species removal is at the time of development or platting. Invasive species removal, at least initially, should be the responsibility of the developer with on-going maintenance or removal falling on the homeowners association or individual property owners. The applicant has identified a significant tree stand in the southeast portion of the property (primarily the east half of proposed Lot 2) which is proposed to be protected via a tree pre servation easement. The tree preservation easement is also proposed to extend along the perimeter of the entire property beginning at the south end of the wetland on the east and continuing around clockwise to the north end of proposed Lot 5. This tree preservation easement will protect the significant tree s identified on proposed Lot 2 as sugar maple, some basswood, American elm, boxelder and ironwood as well as a stand of white pine s on the western perimeter. A conservation easement is proposed at the north end of proposed Lot 1 where it abuts the Sim s property. This easement may preserve lake views enjoyed from the Sim s property. As part of the development the applicant/developer will be required to plant one shade tree for every 40 feet of road frontage. Staff sugge sts the shade trees be of a complimentary native species to offset the removal of dead/diseased trees and possibly healthy native tree s from the building sites. Wetlands on Site and/or Impacted Accordin g to the submitted survey there is a 30,896 square foot (0 .7 acre) Manage 2 wetland on the property. Establishment of wetland buffers and buffer setbacks will be triggered for the lots containing wetlands; a Manage 2 wetland requires a 25-foot native vegetated buffer and a 20-foot structural setback from the buffer. The applicant is proposing a 30 -foot vegetated buffer with a 25-foot structural setback from the buffer. This exceeds the City's requirements . The wetland ha s been delineated, reclassified through the MnRAM process and approved by the MCWD . The City will require a Flowage and Con servation Easement over all wetlands and buffers de signated on the site. Wetland buffer #13-3591 11 February 2013 Page 6 of 7 signage should be purchased by the developer for installation along buffer areas and where the buffer intersects lot lines. Road Improvements and/or Easements Needed The City requires standard perimeter, drainage and utility easements around all property boundaries in the plat as well as Conservation and Flowage Easements over the delineated wetlands and wetland buffers. Conservation easements should be provided to protect the views and trees as indicated in the KES Conservation Design Report. Stormwater and Drainage Improvements The development is subject to the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee of $3,840 per acre x 13.72 total acres= $52,684.80. (Because none of the proposed lots exceed 4.0 gross acres, the 2013 Fee Schedule 2-acre maximum fee stipulation does not apply.) Park/Trail Easement/Fees or Dedication Needed The 2008-2030 CMP Comprehensive Trail System Map (Exhibit BB) indicates that a future trail is planned on Bayside Road (CSAH 84). The Planning Commission should discuss the merits of an easement for trail purposes adjacent to Bayside Road over the SO-foot road corridor outlet. The Park Fee is determined as 8% of the fair market value of the land being subdivided, or a maximum of $5,550 per residential dwelling unit. The Hennepin County Assessor has indicated that 8% of the raw land value will exceed the maximum fee. Once the land is reassessed following development the value will increase again. Therefore, for this property, staff has determined that as there will be five new dwelling sites, the Park Fee will be $27,750. Utility Locations and Availability The subject property is not located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA); sewer service is not available to these properties. The properties are proposed to be served by septic systems and private wells. All septic systems must be located 20' from all property boundaries, 20' from structures, hardcover and the delineated edge of wetlands. Private wells shall be setback 3' from structures and SO' from septic systems. Septic system designs have been submitted to the City and have been approved by Willie Gibbs, Septic Manager. Issues for Discussion Conservation Design: The developer has prepared a Conservation Design Report which identifies areas where trees and positive views should be preserved; the plan also outlined invasive, non -native species to be removed. The report indicates the individual land owners should be responsible for invasive species removal upon construction of a new home. Staff would recommend the responsibility of the initial removal be placed on the developer; the homeowners association should be responsible for ongoing maintenance. The planning commission should direct the applicant in this regard. Additionally, the planning commission should identify other areas which should be reviewed , protected or preserved as part of the plat if appropriate. Access: The applicant is proposing to create an Outlot connecting to an existing outlot corridor for the new private road. The applicant has indicated that creating the private road to City standards may impact their lot layout and ultimately may not be feasible considering the existing connecting outlot configuration. Staff has requested a revised road layout which better meets the City's standards; at the drafting of this report the revised plan has not been submitted or reviewed by staff. Existing Driveway Relocations #13-3591 11 February 2013 Page 7 of 7 As noted above the Geffre driveway is not proposed to be relocated as required . The planning Commission should discuss the recommendations of staff and Hennepin County using the guidance provided in the Bayview Farms 2 nd Addition resolutions and direct the applicant accordingly. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the planning commission walk through the known issues identified within the staff report and discuss with the applicant the available options. Staff recommends the application be tabled upon providing clear direction to the applicant regarding expectations. The applicant should be prepared to discuss the issues with the commission and prepare to draft revised plans as requested for placement on the March planning commission agenda . PC ExhibitA City of Orono Subdivision Application Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Main: 952-249-4600 fax: 952-249-4616 Mailing Address: P.O . Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Application # l ~ -3 5 '1 J Date Received: / -;:;, ,&-! _ 3 Amount Paid : U l '2.J.& tf Staff : ~l, ~ Fee: 4illi--=-· -H-,,,~,,....,.,...,q----- Renewal: This application form must be completed in full. Site Address: PROPEitTY INFORMATION: Ou}\ c-t-C.. Property Identification Number (PIN): _Qlp~~'-1-1 ...... 3--=3~4-d.........,cci__.S'~--------------- (Attach legal description to application if not include on the survey.) Date P~?perty Acquired (month/year): ~ 1qq D Abstr~ct ,or'© Torrens, please check one Preser:t.t use of property: (} D Residential ~ Other eJ.{1S,\\C4 Qw\ o+ Zanin~· District: ~'°' -\ ~ -~~~--+~~~~---------- APPLICANT INFORMATION: (_Complete legal names and marital status required for each interested party) Name : [,yi (\ ~ C..nrY)O.("\ Phone {home): ~eu..: (p 12. -'-J " -2ogq Phone (work): Address : a,:5 §\ e.m CoGi-\-t-00fj 1-a\:.e th 0 Email : .,:hellwub v:i @ "'iSI'\. cu"'"' 1 Fax: OWNER INFORMATION: (Complete legal names and marital status required for each in terested party) Name: ~rn~ O.b 0..W~ Phone (home): Phon e (work): Addr~ss : • 4-,: ~ cJo q ~ E~,ti I ~; ii;;,ic;;f;,l'iikkw-n,,:J-LoY'-J Fax ei,,,., . EXISTING LAND USE: U l Number of Tax Parcels: .1Pd:::,()ILO I ~ t-rvl l!YlRI s~i €-'s-a_--k.. re . Ee>VV\ Development Size : \S .O\ Acres Dry Land D, 1 \ Acres Wet Land \&. t"f d, Acres TOTAL, all parce ls Present Use (check one) Present Zoning District Proposal: 0 Residential ; Number of Units: ~~_of g: (Specify) -~__..__\S~~--n__,j.--C)_u.}_\D\-________ _ 0 Division for Tax Purposes 0 Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) -¢-Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites O Existing Units Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) 5 New Units 5 Total Units 'i Units per 13 .1 d.. Acres .::.. 81 .\CS Square Feet Dry Buildab le Land 1$ Residential D Other (specify) Su bd ivision Application Last Updated: N ovember 2010 10 D .4 u (o.c. RECEIVED JAN 2 3 2013 ClTY OF ORONO #3591 Minimum Material Required for Complete Preliminary Plat Application 1. Payment of fees 2. Completed application form. 3. Preliminary plat information on Certificate of Survey. 4 . Certified Property Owners list 5. A list of any other persons you wish notified of this application Minimum Material Required for a Complete Final Plat Application 1 . Payment of fees 2. Signed certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3 . Title opinion. 4. Easements, covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement 6. Letter of Credit APPLICATION FEES: (Planning & Zoning Coordi nator to [X] those which apply) A r 1DD' ,cation Base Fees: Cost Total Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & Ill} $350* Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement $700* Subdivision Aoolication (Class I & II) $700* Preliminarv Subdivision Acolication, plus $30/lot (Class Ill & all non-residential) $850* 1nu,- Final Plat Aoolication (Class Ill) $700!' Park Fees (to be determined per Section 82-227) TBD Legal and Engineering Review As incurred Renewal of Class I, II & Ill Subdivision $350 Renewal of Lot Line Rearranaement $350 *plus, Engineering & Legal Review S . II ,pec1a mprovement F ees: Cost Total Proposed Private Roads , plus $.50/lineal foot $650* + 11~4- Proposed Public Roads, plus $.50/lineal foot $950* + Request for Citv to Acceot Existina Private Road $950* Proposed Sanitarv Sewer Main Extension, olus $25/stub $275* + Proposed Watermain Extension, p lus $25/stub $275* + Prooosed Storm Sewer System (exctudina culverts) $250* On-site System, Site Evaluation Review (acclicable to rural subdivision) $60/cer lot x$60 °?or:r- *plus, Engineering & Legal Review Flexible A lication Fees / Miscellaneous Fees Cost Total Variance $700* Varies Easement Vacation Associated with a Subdivision $200* PRO A lication with Subdivision, $35/dwellin unit x$35 *plus, Engineering APPLICANT ANO/OR OWNER: ...... • Agree to provide all information required or requested by the Planning Department • Agree to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment} and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge . The applicant and owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until It is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • The Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Applicant and/or Owner acknowledge th ust be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant nd/ owner is unable to attend a sci1eduled meeting, please make arrangements to hav an authorized represe tati i:ittend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to our proj '-, Applicant's Signature:_.-,--l~-====tl:st:~.;J..~J\L..!!! d Applicant's Signature:-t-l'd,l-7-:-7"--f'<;;:--'--t-frff:ih'\t:::~~- Date: __ 7+/,,?....::;Z'-=~~,hL-~~----Date: ____________ _ _.-Date :._~/µb!::..:2--/:.,,.ll'..L,,J£...-__ _ Date: ___ 7'----=~------- City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono MN 55356 Receiot No: 3.008325 952-249-4600 Jan 23, 2013 Ervin Wachrnan Planning ar,d Zonir,Q Escrow ileposit -Outlot C 101 000 .00 Bayv iew Farra Second Addltion 101-22205 Deferred Rev-Developer De~~sit Planninq ar,d Zor,ing Subd -Outlet C Ba yvi ew 2,484 .00 Farm Sec ond Addition 101-34420 Cond Use-Variance -Dev Fees Total: Che ck Check No: 4214 Pavor : Ervin Wachraar, Total Applied: Cha nge Tendered: 12,484.00 ------------·----------------- 12,484.00 12,48 4.00 .00 01/23/2013 10:48AM "BAYSIDE MEADOWS" -Development Narrative January 23, 2013 Developer Introduction: Ervin Wachman 2135 Salem Court Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Project Manager/Consultant: William Coffman Coffman Development Services, Inc. Cellular 612-202-0692 Email: billcoffman@cbbumet.com The developer is proposing to subdivide a 13.72 acre parcel into 5 new single family home sites. The proposed project name is "BAYSIDE MEADOWS". The site is located in Section 6, Township 117N, Range 23W, which is on the south of Bayside Road (County Rd #84), and just east of County Road 19. The property is currently platted as Outlot C, Bayview Farms 2nd Addition. Access will be a proposed private street via outlots B & D of Bayview Farms 2nd Addition. The property was part of a preliminary and final plat application in 1994 (City of Orono Reso lution #3483 and #3492), which set the site up for future development. The property is located within the RR-IB, Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. The western half of the site is existing farm land, which is currently a hayfield. The eastern half of the site is a sloping meadow with a flat wetland in the middle and a woodland area on the south/southeast corner of the site. The He nnepin County soils survey shows the site contains mostly loam soils which are generally classified as clayey soils. A wetland delineation report and a natural resources inventory were completed for the project by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company and are part of the project app li cation. This proposed residential de velopment will consist of high end single family homes. It is anticipated that these lot and home packages will sell for $900,000 and up and would be a welcome addition to the City of Orono 's tax base. The site is within the Mound/Westonka Independent School District 277. PC Exhibit B -1 - 1/23/201 3 RECEIVED JAN 2 3 2013 CITY OF ORONO #3591 "BAYSIDE MEADOWS" Upon City approval, the project construction is to begin in the Spring of 2013. The site grading work will consist of a private street and a storm water treatment pond construction. There will be some minimal grading on each of the lots to complete the street construction and the grading balance for the project. The grading within the two existing outlots between the Geffre ( 4665 Bayside Rd) and Sims ( 4645 Bayside Rd) will require a grading easement in order to keep the private road as low as possible to the adjacent landowners to lessen the visual impacts. The developer is working with the two adjacent owners to obtain the necessary construction easements. Also, a stipulation of the plat approval in 1994 for Bayview Farms 2°d Addition, as it was the city's intent to have both 4665 and 4645 revise their driveway locations onto Outlot B and to eliminate their direct driveway access to Bayside Road. The Sims ( 4645), are in agreement with that condition. The Geffres ( 4665), prefer to maintain their driveway out to Bayside Road. -2- 1/23/2013 359 J Development Team: Civil Engineering, Surveying & Land Planning - Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. Robert S. Molstad, P.E. David B. Pemberton, P .L.S . 150 South Broadway Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Telephone: 952-476-6000 Facsimile: 952-476-0104 Email: molstad@sathre.com Email: pemberton@sathre.com Wetland & Biological Sciences - Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company Melissa Barrett 26105 Wild Rose Lane Shorewood, Minnesota 553321 Telephone: 952-401-8757 Facsimile: 952-401-8798 Email: melissa@kjolhaugenv.com Soil Sciences- Haugo GeoTe chnical Services Paul Haugo 13570 Grove Drive #278 Maple Grove, MN 55311 Telephone: (612) 554-4829 Email: p.haugo@gmail.com Comprehensive Plan, Zoning. & Variances: This property is currently zoned RR-lB, Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. Access to the site is propo sed via Outlots Band D, which conforms with the approved final plat resolution. Variances -Two variance requests are required for this proposed project. 1. C ity Code require s a maximum cul-de-sac length of 1000 feet. The proposed plan has a street length of 1,068 feet to the center of the cul-de-sac from the centerline of Bayside Road. 2. The minimum curve radius design standard is 275 fe et. Due to the existing configuration of Outlot D and private road alignment, a radius of 100 feet is proposed. -3 - 1/23/201 3 #3 59 1 Orono Zoning: The property is currently zoned RR-lB: Proposed Zoning-RR-lB Minimum Lot Area-2.0 acres Minimum Width-200 feet Front Yard Setback -50 feet Side Yard Setback -30 feet / 50 feet (street) Rear Yard Setback -50 feet A preliminary plat lot area tabulation sheet is in Appendix A of this narrative. Site Analysis: The site is bordered on the north by two existing homes. Both of these home sites were part of the plat application for Bayview Farms 2nd Addition. Access to the site is between these two homes within two proposed outlots. There are existing home sites surrounding the property. The site consists of existing farmland (hayfield) on the western half of the site. The northeastern side is sloping with a flat wetland in the middle of the site. A wooded area exists in the southeast comer of the site. Please see the existing conditions plan and the aerial site plan. The site topography is sloping within the site with peak elevations on the north end of the site at +/-1010 and sloping to the east and west. One wetland was delineated on the site in the middle of the eastern half of the side. The wetland elevation is+/-960 to 961. No wetland impacts are proposed for this project. The Soil Survey of Hennepin County indicates Lester, Cordova, Hamel, and Angus Loams over most of the site. The soils that are present on most of the site consist of mostly moderately drained loams and clayey loams with a moderate to low permeability. These soil types are typically suitable for residential development. The site is within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Street Design: "BAYSIDE MEADOWS" proposes to have 20' wide bituminous pavement private streets with a 2' gravel shoulder, and a 2' deep ditch, the ditch bottom will be 3 feet with 3: 1 slopes. All streets will be constructed to the section proposed by the pavement design recommendations of the geotechnical engineer. A copy of the pavement design report, prepared by Haugo Geotechnical Services (Dated: January 10, 2013, Project #13-010) was submitted with the preliminary plat application. Site Grading: The site grading is planned to begin in the spring of 2013. The private roadway and the stormwater treatment pond will be graded in one phase. Some off-site grading will be required on the two adjacent parcels ( 4645 and 4665) for the private drive construction. The proposed house placements on Lots 1-5 are for illustrative purposes only, we have shown some possible future contours. Some minor lot grading adjustments may be required to balance the overall site -4- 1/23/2013 359 ). grading. A detailed final grading plan will be submitted with the final plat application. The proposed overall graded area is+/-2 .5 acres. Storm water: The storm water treatment pond will provide temporary storage of stormwater runoff, treatment of storm water, and sediment removal. The outlet from the stormwater treatment area will discharge into the existing wetland. The stormwater plan will provide adequate treatment and storage to meet the City requirements. A stormwater report was prepared and submitted with this preliminary plat application for the City to review. The project is exempt from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District review, since the new residential development will result in less than 20 percent increase in the impervious surface. Wetlands: A wetland delineation report was prepared by Kjohaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (KES) (KES Project No. 2012-068, dated October 22, 2012). A copy of the delineation report has been submitted with this application. A wetland classification type change was submitted to the watershed along with the MNRAM assessment data. The watershed reviewed and approved the change to wetland type: Manage 2. The proposed site plan shows a 30 ' wetland buffer and a 25' City required wetland setback. No wetland impacts are proposed for this project. The proposed wetland buffers and setbacks are shown on the attached plan sheets. Some construction will occur in the wetland setback area, no work is proposed within the buffer area. At the completion of construction and prior to home building, wetland buffer markers will be placed at the specified locations. Natural Resouces Inventory -Woodland Areas & Protection: KES prepared a natural reso urces information inventory for the proposed project. The report is attached for City review . Landscape Plan, Monuments, & Entrance: This development will create a site with preserved natural woodland areas, scenic vistas, pond and wetland views. The stormwater pond and private drive will have landscaping and/or trees. The entrance to BAYSIDE MEADOWS is proposed to have an entrance monument with typical landscaping. A custom entry monument will also be designed and constructed. This will create a sense of luxury and livability for the new single family residents . Homeowner's Association and Restrictive Covenants: The developer will prepare restrictive covenants and standards that will apply to the entire neighborhood during both the initial development and the overall operation of the s ubdivision. These documents will be prepared and submitted with the final plat application. A select group of builders will participate in "BAYSIDE MEADOWS". The restrictive covenants will be tailored to the developer's vision of the project. Each builder will be required to meet the specifics of building types, landscaping, and overall goals of the development. The HOA will be responsible for mainte nance issues within the subdivision. These will include the private street, storm water treatment pond and entrance monument. They may also include special landscaping, mailboxes, signage, and any other common elements. -5- 1/23/2013 APPENDIXA PRELIMINARY PLAT LOT AREA TABULATION WACHMAN-ORONO DATE: 1/18/2012 BLOCKl LOT AREA WETLAND AREA 151,711 sq. ft. 3.48 acres 30,189 sq. ft. 2 98,631 sq. ft. 2.26 acres 393 sq. ft. 3 119,945 sq. ft . 2.75 acres sq. ft. 4 89,251 sq. ft. 2.05 acres sq. ft. 5 94,089 sq. ft. 2.16 acres sq. ft. Total 553 ,627 sq. ft. 12.71 acres 30,582 sq. ft. OUTLOT 44,016 sq. ft. 1.01 acres sq. ft. WETLAND AREA Total Lots 553,627 sq. ft. 12.71 acres 30,582 sq. ft. Total Outlot 44,016 sq. ft. 1.01 acres sq. ft. TOTAL 597,643 sq. ft. 13.72 acres sq. ft. -6 - 1/23/2 013 LEGEND AIS Dc:notes Advcrtising-Infonnatioo.aJ Sign M:! Dmotes Air Cooditiooio& Umt lf't Ocnotes Baseman Floor Bcvmoa C8 Dmotcs Caich Basin C80ll Omoto, Curb Box CCI. Dmotes Buildin& Colwm I[[ Denotes Building Ennncc EJevadoa 18 Dmotcs Tdo'Comm. BolC/P<d OiH l>mot<S C-Hmdbole oat Deootes Commmiadoo M.amolc CCWC Denota: Cooac:te Surface Cl,I' Dmotes ConuJat<d Mcul Pip,;si,e DIP Dmotes Ductile boo Plpc/Si,.e El Dmotcs Elcaric Box [Hit !>moles EIC<tric llaodho1e TltAN Dmol.cs Elcaric Tr1D.1fonncr £11H £11 FH FP rtS CASV en GIi GIil Cl' G'l'W HCS HYD l.P 118 NOP OHU PKS PIV IICP RO sco -sv SlP S'IIIH 1RS 1l ucc UG[ UGC SAN ST uP UU' 1NH -w 11[1 A-1 Omotcs Elc:ct:ric Manhole Ocooct'S Elct1ric Meta Omotesftre~ Dmous Fla& Pole Dmctcs Flared End Sectro'Sizc Dc:ootes Gas Valve Ocnoccs Garage Aoor EleYatioD Dmotcs Gas Meter Dmotcs Grotmd Liibt Dmotes Guard Post Dmoces Guy Wire Dcno«es Handicap Part.ing Sign Omoccs Fire Hydnot Deno< .. LigJu Pole Dmoccs Mailbox Dmotet No Parkin& Sip DmotQ 0.obead Utilicy LiDe Dmotcs Pam,,g Sip Dmota; Pos:t lodi.cator Valve Oenotci Re-ini>rccd Coom.1c Pipo'Sa.e Dcno<<S RoofllniD Denotes Sanitary CJeanout Denotes Samia')' Maahole Dmol<S Sq,eic Vml l>wot<S S,op Sip Denotes Stonn Manho le Omolcs Traffic Control Sign !>moles Tnff"IC Ligbt Dtnnt~ t ltvlcrgrowxt COllllDWUcatioo Line l)(no(cs Uod crground Electric Line Da,ot,s Undapoond Gas Line Denotes Underground Sanitary Sewer Ocoot~Uoderground Storm Scwu Dmol<SUlilityl'Ole Dwot<S Urility/Liglu Pole Deootcs Top Nut of Hydrant Omotcs Water Manhole Denotes W•er Valve Dwolcs Wc:tJand Delineation/Flag [dcmificr Owota: Existing Conaow ~!>moles Proposed Comoor • Dmotcs Found Mooument • As Omot<d ® 0 Deotocs Found Cast • Iron -MonWDCD Dmola 112" by 14" lroo Pipes« md Mal<al by Licmse No. 40344 60 60 SCALE IN FEET 160 --- \ I I I I (CO~,!~AD N~!4) B~ YSIDE ROAD ----------'----- I I _l_ -k \_,o I I I DESCIU1"l]ON OF SUBJECT PROPERTY Owo1 C, ex<q,< the North 123.00 rm of the Wes1148.S0 fmof<>wot C, BAYVIEW FARMS2ND ADDITION, Hcnnq,in . srrE ADDRESS Unas.,;p<d • Orono, MlnncsoU 55359 This SW"l'ey ooa oot purport 10 sbow any uodcrgrmnd. UlilitiC'-. lbe so..ce of infonnMioo from plam atd marldnp will be combined wi1b obicrvcd eYidmce of utililics 10 dcvdop a view o( those UDdcrgrouod utilities. 1-k>wever, lacking excav auon, the euc:t Joc,rion of undapound fcatu= CIDOOI be accun1d y, ooq,lc<dy and miably depicted. Where additional or more dee.ailed information is requinxl, the ctiem is advised th.al ex.cavatioo may be necessary . Tbe coonaor sbaJI detcnninc the exact locatioo of any and all cxistin& utilities before collllD(:DCial.g work. lbc c:ootractor sbaU be fully responsible for any and all datntgcs arising OUl of his faihD'C to exactly locate and JXQtect all existing utility facilities. Cont1tt GOPHER STATE ONE CALL at 6SI-C S4-0002 for precise oositc: bcatioo ofUlil.itics pri(rK> any cxcavatioo. CwlOm HolnC Builders Title. LLC, &$ usuina a&t:Dl for Oki Republic National Title 1nsunoce O>q,aoy commitmcol tor title insuraDee fiJc No. HB--2SOS3. effective date of December 3, 2012. was relied upoo as IO matters of""""1 TbeAi>jc<t propaty _. lO liewnhin ZoDC X, (,iea ofucas.....tcthe 1-per«D mnual cballce ~ areas of 1% aonua.lc:haocc sbecl Dow 8ooding •·bc:reavmgc depths are less tba.o t foot, areas of 1% amrua1 cbaocc: stream flooding what the oontributina: drainage area is less than I square mile, or areas protectOO tom 1bc 1% a.unual thaoce flood by levees. No Bue Flood Elevations or depth, are shown within this z.ooe. 1unoce purdla.se is aot rcqwed in tllCX zooes.), pa lhe National Flood lt&sl.l'IDCC Prop-am. Flood lnslnncc Rate Map Cou,.mmity Pand No. 210SJ C028SE, d,ted Seplember 2, 2004 as acquired from the F<dcnl E1DCTgmcy Maiag..-Al"ICY Wd>Sitc. Am lnlixmalioo: Loi Am • 597,643 Sq. Ft · 13.72 A= Curtt"OI wrung and setback inJormatioo: Zoniog: RR-lB • Ooc Fauiily Runt R<Sidailial Bllllding Sert>.:ks: F'root Yard · 50 feec Rear Yant · SO tc:et Side Yant · JO fee</ SCrcet • SO fee< •Zoning and S<fbad( infonnarioo provided by the Plannmg Department of the City or Orono. Survey cooninate and bearing bas is : Hennepin County Coonlinale Base No JD>dilications IO this swvcy or skdch may be performed by any pason other than the surveyo r signing this «rtificatioo or )X1'SOllS Ulldtt tm direct supavisioo. This drawing and data lS P"()lccted by fulaal copyright laws. Its rc:procu::lioo md rcdistributiOD wilbout proper coosa>.1 is probibiccd. Btndunart: MNOOT Geodetic Conuol Slation Y I 17 RES ET Maple Plain Elevarioo • 1013.43 feet (NGVD29) TITLE COMMITMEfil NQI!S: 10. P.-ctl subjec:1 IO utility and drainage CIISemtl'lts as shown on the plat of BAYVIEW FARMS 2ND ADDrTI ON. 11. Parod subject w, cams aod CODditioos or Flowage and Coosc:rvatKHI Ea.K,ocoi md Waiv«of Dain.ages, in favor of the City of Orooo, which grants the right to rcsttic.t the ~e. improvements and dcvdopment over the wt.1.lmds as sbowo oo. the plat of BA YVI.EW FARMS, 6Jed oo February 12. 1980, as Documfflt No. 137 1023. (Dcfao<d as "as 5howtl oo the plal of BAYVIEW FARMS"). 12. Parcel w bjcct to tcnns and oonditioos of Road aDd u,mties Ea.scmc:nt for public Ulgrcss. cw<n, actaS. road and utilities purpos es, lD favor of City o f Orono, as a eated in dcx:umcot da.lod October 28, 1994, filed Nov<tllber 29, 1994, as 0ocu.-No . 257002.S. (0.c, Outlol D, BA YVlEW FARMS 2ND ADDITION) 13. Parcel suijcct to terms and cooilitioos of R~d and Utilities Easemc:ots for publ.ic lOGJ'C'S$,, egress, accas. road and utilities p.upo,sa, in favor ofC'lry o!Orooo, as created io docwnaJI: dated Oootbcr 28, 1994, filed November 19, 1994, as Oocummt No. 2570026. (Ova Out1ot 8 , BA YVlEW FARMS 2ND ADDffiON) 14. Aa:e1s so tbc subjffl property is lim.iled o ver public cascmtlll in Cavor oftbe City of Orono. lS. Pan::d subject so wdlaod.s which may be subjoct 10 fcdmu, state, or local regulatioo. Pared SUbjcctlOtcnns aod aotitiom for Driveway E~I OVtr°'41ot B. BAYVfEW FARMS 2ND ADDrTI ON, in fa<0< oflol l, Block I, BAYVIEW FARMS 2ND ADDITION. (Shown oo Certificate ofTitle) This is 1o ocni fy10 ERVIN WAO{MAN. JR..., LAKE COMMUNnYBANK..UJSTOM 1-K)MEBIJU.J)ERS 1TT1...E COMPANY and OLD REPUBL(C NATIONAL 1l11..E INSURANCE COMPANYtb&I this IIl,lp or pLll andthl: ""'"CY on which ii is bued were made iD KCQrdancc with lbc 20 11 M1nimum Slandatd Detail RccpJ.i:emc:ots for AL TA/ACSM Lmdntlc s.nty,,joialty<Stablisbcd aod-b)'ALTAandNSPS. e PC ExhibitC Vl ::::i; O> i7i8 ~~ ••J,JN OWNER: PETER & SHARON RENNEBOHM PID#-0611723210005 ---·n::m~. ~,II' w <( ,.... -----------/ /~ ---· ---i ~~ / / .11:! '1 ' . / ,... " / / ~9 ~ --' \ " \ / / a::a. I I' / w \ ,·· 11 .r J . I ---' \ / \ \ II! I (. \ .... . lit ', . J. I \~ j \ \ i. \ .. -.:___ . \ \ \J .. .-_ "" , ., I \ .i 1a,-------~tb ~~o '-,., \. ---J ~ \ Jo, ""> ' ~ ~ \ ~· ' ~ ., I O ', F ,,...,.,,,,_,,,,_,,,,-Q Q ' ' ~ ,-,L------~~---~~~-· '~). . . 1~ . 8 0 g ' ooq,~ ·--,~ ' ---· -! I I I '_ -~:. ·-.J 0 ~ \ \ ' ;; i, ;i i ' ' ' .. . ~ t : 0 _ .. 0 ' <• ~ . . a. ~ 0 OWNER: BRADLEY PASS PID#-0611723240001 0 i .. .. 0 .,. 0 i I I I I I -I I J ·: I PC Exhibit D Vl Vl < Q. -; lriN .'Ilg I') VlN •• Vl I') 0::<N w Q." fC);: Oz'° 00 a:: I I-,... vi9 ::::i; Q. a:: < < <.i ' I \ I I \ ' dO I oo o oo Jo._o __ o_fo_· ;_oo_, ___ o_0 ___ o_J_'_o_·_~ __ o_~o_;_0+;0 ... 0=--o_())A __ ~ ___ iio1-1ol!"f-l,r., ... o:> ____ ;o0;;;...__o __ o_o_~j I I I I I OWNER: JAMES MORGAN & OCBRA PULFORD PIDf-0611723220022 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET OWNER: AMERICAN HOME MORTGA GE f>ID#-0611723220021 1,--..:D:::ES;:::IGNER=:.:__-4-;.;.:NO:;_. 4-=Bc:.Y--1-.=;DAc:..:TE-=--1~----"R;;:;.EV;.c.clS"-'ION"'S"------l USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND(OR CONVEYANCE OF RSM _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ INFORM.t.TION)OFTHISPRODUCTISSlRICll.YPROHIBITEDWllHOUT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANO THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER Ut.OER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DRAWN BY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'• EXPRESS v.RITIEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WllHOUT RSM CHECKED BY DATE 0 1-16-13 S>JD AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN 11.LEGITIMATE USE AND SHAU. THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST. INC. OF AU. RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES O R LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE use. R-, S. Moist~, PE. Data : Ol /t d!) Lie. No. l-:4':ael OWNER: JAMES & JULIE DZUBA Y PID#-0611723220023 SATHRE-BERGQU IST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAY ZATA , MN . 55391 (Q52)47~000 OWNER: ERIN SU LLIVAN PI0#-0611723220024 CITY PROJECT NO. ORONO, MINNESOTA EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN WACHMAN PARCEL FILE NO. 31202-070 ' • I I I I I : :........1. J I I I 1 I I I l 1 : I I ! I ~ I :~· I ;1 I ~l I t<~ a:i I c5 I ld u:. ul ~) I xi LiJ 1~ I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I DESIGN DATA: STREET SECTION: 1.5" SPWEB2408 WEAA COURSE (MN DOT 2360) 2.5 " SPNWB230B BASE COURSE (MN DOT 2360) 8° CL 5 AGGREGATE BASE (MN DOT 3138) SUB GRADE FABRIC (8 OVSY, NON-WOVEN)(ff requrod) e" (2' ...to) CL 7 AGGREGATE SHOULDER C ROSS SECTION: 3'4 CRov,,,i 10' PAVEMENT WIDTli 2' AGGREGATE SHOULDER 3:1 DITCH SLOPE 2' TYPICAL DITCH DEPTli 3' TYPICAL DITCH WIDTli INSTALL CULVERTS FOR EACH DRIVEWAY WITH HOME CONSTRUCTION SITE DATA: ZONING: RR-1B MIN LOT AREA: 2.0 AC MIN LOT WIDTli: 200 FT FYSB-50 FT SYSB -30FT SYSB STRT -50 FT RYSB-50FT OWNER : PETER & SHARON RENNEBOHM PI0#-0611723210005 ~· I ~~ la ,--o~~-1 s:i•~ I ~ I I ' I r ----~ I ; ___ ~:-_____ , I I I I I I I I I ~-I I I I .,., / / V OWNER: JAMES MORGAN & DEB RA PULFORD PI0#-0611723220022 ,,,_ -- -MAX COS LENGTli -1000 FT -MIN CURVE 275 FT 5025 0 25 50 1 00 SCALE IN FEET • ..;,1 ': + t. OWNER: AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE P!Df-0611723220021 1-...:Dc::E'=SIG::::.N.:,:ER:.:_-+=+B::..:Y-+.....:D::;_A:.:.;TE=--i----...;.R:::EVIS.:.;;:::;IONS=:;. ____ -l USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, ANO/OR CONVEYANCE OF RSM _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ INFORMATION)OFTHISPRODUCTIS STRICTLYPROHIBITEDWITliOUT I HEREBY CERT IFY TliAT Tlil S PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION A ND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER TliE LAWS OF THE S TATE OF MINNESOTA DRAMl B Y SATHRE -BERGQUIST, INC .'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTliORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMAT E USE AND SHALL TliEREBY INDEMNIFY SATliRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBl LITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES TliE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSE S RESULT ING FROM 11.LEGITMATE use. RSM CHECKED BY IOO( DATE 0 1-15-13 Robert S. MolSI , P.E. Dato: Lie. No. ldr'fl-l + + + + + ,' I I 1=1 OWNER: BRADLEY PA SS PID#-0611723240001 / / / / __ .-:.., -r--., 11 .J --..-!---.,1 .J----.. , ~ :]rii"•-... / L ~-"io/' E.,.,,,,-"" '\411 /. /\.. / /, .,;"' ) < ~~ ,1 \ ("' _/' , I ~, v .,,,,.,,,,., I v I Vl Vl < a. PC Exhibit E L - ~1? .1 1. I I I I ' .. I I I --I .. r -- 1 .. t I OWNER: JAME S & JULIE DZUBA Y PIDf-061 1723220023 SATHRE-BERGQU IST, INC . 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN . 55391 (952) 476~ I I I 1 L----~,-----~-----~ I i 00 'cj)O O 00 ,' OWN ER : ERIN SU LLI VAN PIDN-0611723220024 DEVELOPER ERVIN WACHMAN 2135 Salem Cout Lo ng Lake, M innesota 55365 PROJECT CONSULTANT WILLIAM COFFMAN Sheet SP EX AA pp SHEET INDEX TABLE I Description I Preliminary Site Plan I ExistinQ Conditions Plan I Alta Survey I Preliminary Plat Conman Dcvclopmcn1 SeMccs. tnc. c,uuw612-202-0692 Ernail:billcoflinan@:bbumcloom GP ST LS Aerial I Preliminary GradinQ & Erosion Control Plan I Preliminarv Street Pla n & Profile CITY PROJECT NO. ORONO, MINNESOTA I Landscaoin!l Plans I AP.rial -!;OQ; SAtback Plan PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN BAYSIDE MEADOWS FILE NO. N 0 80 40 NORTH 40 80 SCALE IN FEET 180 'M:T A-1 Oeootes Wetland Delineation/Flag ldcnlificr ---980 --Denotes ExisfuwC- ~Denotes ProposcdCon»ur • Oc:uotcs found Monument -AJ Dc:notcd @ Dcnl0cs Found Cast -boo -Monument O Denotes l/2" by 14" Iron Pipe Set ml Marked by License No. 403 44 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS AR.E SHOWN THUS: ==1 NOTTO SCALE Being S feet in widlh a"'1 adjoining Jot lines. Wll,ss olhcrwisc indicated, 1"'110 feet in width and adjoinir,a rigl<of way Lines. unless otherwise indicated. as shown on tbcpb.t V I C I N I T y T I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ --- L (COLJlhj r:}r~tD N?iir~:) ---------- LOT I ~ BL<X:K l BAYVIEW B1 ,L3 119,945 sq. ft . 2.75"!" .. ' 245.22 R•313.3S 6•44°49':;4" LOT I B LOCK2 FARMS 0-11: EIIIC • £UZ"8ETH SIMS l--'DE=S::.IGNER==-:..-+='-1--::Bc:Y'::-1'-:'D:::A,:,TE"'::+-:-::-::-:==-=c:--'R'"FN=IS::.;IONS=;;_------t USE (INC LUDING COPYING . DISTRIBUTION, ANO/OR CONVEYANCE OF ~p 01/21113 ADDOUTLOT _ _ _ _ _ INFORMATION)OFTHISPROOUCTISSTRICTLYPROHIBITEDWITHOUT I had>y certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or UM:cr my direct supervision and that I am a duly Liccoscd Land Surveyorut-1crtbe laws of the State of Minncsola. DRA'M-1 BY DBP CHECKED BY OBP DATE 01117/13 S ATHRE-BERQQUIST, INC.'sEXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION . USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEG ITIMATE USE ANO SHAU. THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHR E-BE RGQUIST. INC. RESERVES THE RIG HT TO HOLO ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM 11.LEGITMATE US E- Dat~\::t=20~. David B. Pembenon, Prof<SSional Land Surveyor Minnesota Licc:nsc No. 40344 I I _l_ -, -t I l I I I I I "' I s I 8 ! I I I --- --- ' SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN . 553Q1 (952) 476-6000 DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY Outlot C. except theNor1h 123.00 fe<1 of the Wes, l 48.SO fe<1 ofOutlotC. BAYVIEW FARMS 2ND ADDITION, Hennepin . SITE ADDR.ESS Unassicncd-Orono, Minnesota 55359 NOTES This survey docs oot purpon IO show any undcrlfound utiljties. The source of information fiom plam ~ mar1tines will be combined with observed. evidence of utili ties to develop a view of those~ utilities. However, w:Jcin& excavation, the cxaa localion ofundc:rground features aMOt be acwnt<:ly, a,q,lc1cly and rdiably dq:Mdcd. ~additional o r morcdeuik:d information is required, lbc:dienr.isadviscd thatcxavation maybc:oeccssary. The contn.ctor shall dctc:nnine the exact location o f any and ill custing utilities bd:>rc a>l1llllCnCq work. The contnclor shall be fully responsible for any and all damages arising out of his failure., cualy locale and protect all existing utility facilities. Contaa GOPHER STA TE ONE CALL a t 65 l-454-0002 for precise onsitc loc2lion o f Lmlmcs prio<10 any o:c.avation. Custom Home Builders Tille, LLC, as issuing agent for Old Republic National Tille lnsuranceCoffl)all)' commitment for title insurance file No. HB~250S8. cffcctivcdaicofDcccrrt>e:r3, 2012. wasretied~aslO mattas of rcc:on:1 The subject property appear,"' lie within Zone X, (area of arc.s outside the l-pcrca>t amual clw>Ce floodplam, arca.sof 1%.amual chanccshc:ec flow flooding where avcngcdq>ths arc 5css than I fooc. areas of 1%aruua.l cbancc stream tlooding: where the contnbuting drainage area is: less than I $QUUC mile, or areas protected from the I% annu.t chance flood by levees. No Base Flood Elev ations or depths arc shown within this iooe. lmuranc:e pwdlasc i.1 not required in these zones.), per the National Flood l nsuranoc Program. Flood lnsur>nee Rate Map Corrmmity Panel No. 27053C028SE, data! Scpt<mbcr 2, 2004 as acquired from the Feder.II Emergency Managemcu Agency WebSilC. Area Information : Lot Arca • 597,643 Sq. Fl -13.72 Ac:rcs Current z,,ning ml sctbadc information, Zonina: RR -lB -One Family Rural Residential Buiiding Sdbacks: Fro'" Yaro -SO fe<1 Rear Yaro -so feet Side Yan! -30 feet / Stn:<f-50 foe, •Zonin& and Setback infonnation provided by the Planning Departmc:ntofthc City ofOrorxi. Survey coordinate and bcarin& basis : Hcnnq,;,, Coumy Coordinale Base No modifications to this survey or sketch may be pcrfonncd by any pcrnon other than the surveyors~ lhr.o. certlftcation or persons under his d irect supervision. This drawing aro data is protected by fcdcrat copyright laws. Its rqmxtuctioa and redistribution without proper COll!iiem is prohibilm.. Benchmark: MNDOT Geodetic Control Station YI 17 RESET -Maple Plain ElcYatioo • 101 3.43 fe<1 (NGVD29) TITLE COMMITMENT NOTES: 10. Parcel subject ID utility and drainage easements as shown on the pl.at of BAYVIEW FARMS 2ND ADDITION. 11. Pa.reel subject to terms and conditionsof Flowagc: andCo nsc:rvation~and Waiver of Damages. in favor of the City of Orono. wh.ich grants the: right ID restrict the use. irq:,rovcmcnts ard development over the w etlands a, showo on the plal ofBAYVIEWFARMS, 6Ja:lonfdxuary 12. 1980, as Documcol No. 1371023. (Defined as "asshownonthcplalofBA YVIEW FARMS"). 12. Parcel subject to terms and cordittOns of Road and Utilities Easement for pubtic ingress. egrt"SS, KUSS, road aoo utilities purposes. in favor of City of On>no. as acaltd in doc:umcnt daltd Orcd:,er 28, 1994, filed November 29, 1994, as Document No. 257002.S . (Ovcr Outlot D, BAYVlEW FARMS 2ND ADDITION) 13. 14. IS. Pared subject "' terms ml cond itions of Road and Utilities Easements i>r public ingn:ss. qJ'CSS, access. road and utilities purposes. in favor of City of Orono, as crca1od indoalmcntdaled Ooolbcr 28, 1994, filed November 29. 1994, as Document No. 2570026. (Ovcr Outlot B, BAYVIEW FARMS 2ND ADD ITION) Access to the subject propcny is limited over public c:asanm in f.lvo<oflheCityofOrooo. Pam:l subjce1 to wetlands which may be subject., federal, mtt. or local rqulation. Parcel subject to terms and conditions for Driveway Ea:semmt over Oullot 8 , BAYVIEW FARMS 2ND ADDITION, in lavo r oflot l , Block I , BAYV IEW FARM S 2ND ADDITION. (Shown on CcrtificatcofTitle) TWP.117 -R GE.23-SEC .OIi HEN NEPIN COUNTY PRELIMINARY PLAT BOOK XXXIPAGE XXX ORONO, MINNESOTA BAYSIDE MEADOWS PC Exhibit F FILE NO. 31202-070 pp RESTORATION NOTES RESTORATION ·2.5ACRES I I A . RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH 4" TO 6" Of TOPSOIL. OR EXISTING ON.SITE ORGANIC MTRL. B . SEED POND SLOPES AND DETENTION AREAS WITH MN/DOT 310 OR BWSR P8 SEED MIX AT A RATE OF 100 LBSJACRE AND FERTILIZE WITH 20-0-10AT 100 LBS./ACRE . C. SEEO ALL OTHER DISTURBED AREAS WITH MNDOT 250 ANO BWSR SEEO MIX FOR WETlANOS AT A RATE Of 100 LBS JACRE AND FERTILIZE WITH 20-0-10AT 100 LBSJACRE. (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) D. ONLY PHOSPHOROUS FREE FERTILIZER IS TO BE USED ON SITE. E. MULCH WITH TYPE 1 AT A RATE OF 2 TONS/ACRE AND DISC ANCHOR IMMEOIATELY AFTER PLACEMENT. USE WOODFIBER BLANKET ON ALL SLOPES 3:1 (FT) OR GREATER. F . MAINTAIN ALL SILT FENCE UNTIL TURF HAS BEEN ESTABLISHEO. G. RESTORATION WORK WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN 72 HOURS OF GRADING COMPLETION. 10. SILTFENCE,BEFOREGRADING· 1.110LF SEPTIC FIELD PROTECTION . 8e6 LF AF TER GRADING · 525 LF (pond) 11. TREE FENCE, BEFORE GRADING· 250 LF ON-SITE 8MPS ' I I I I \ \ 1. NVRP PONO • NURP PONO WILL BE UTILIZED TO MEET OR EXCEED QU~ITY ANO RA TE CONTAOl REQUIREMENTS. 2. SKIMMERS . Tl-I E PONO OUTt.ET STRUClVRE INCLUDES A SUBMERGED INlETPIPE TO ALLOW SKIMMING. J. RIP RAP • RIP RAP WILL 8E UTIUZEO II TALL APA.OH S FOR ENERGY O&SSIPATION ANO PROV10E SEDCMENT CONTROL 4'. St.OPE STA.8n..lZA TlOH • Sil T FENCE WM.L BE lNSTALLED ALONG DOWN GRAOENT GRADING LIMITS AND WOOOft8£R 8l.ANKET WILL ae UTILIZED ON ALL SLOPES 3!1 OR GREATER TO PROVioe: ,\OEQVATE SLOPE STABILIZATION. 5. BIOAOUS. BIOROlLS WILL BE INSTALLED ALONC A.EAR YARD SWfd.ES TOPREVENTSEOfMENTFROM REACHING Tl-tE NURP PONO ANO Ul TIMA TELY DOWNSTREAM WETI.ANOS e. INFU.TRATtONIRETENllOH AREAS· INflL TRATIONIRETENTION AREAS WIU BE llT'UZEO TORE.OU~TAIN THE RUNOFF FROM THE INCREASED HARDSURFACE. 7. STRUT SWEEPING. STREET SWEEPING WIU BE DONE A MINIMUM OF ONCE PER WEEK OR MORE FREQUENTLY TO MINIMIZE DUST CONTROL ANO VEHtCLE TRACKIOO 10. PHOSPHOROUS FREE FERT1LIZER · PHOSPHOROUS FREE FERT1..IZER WI..L. AlSO BE USED ON St1E. OWN ER: PETE R & SHARON RENNEB OH M PID#-0611 723210005 I <.--, I \ " :I I I I ', \ \ j i \' r1---\ I I I \_l I l llli \ \ JiJ I \ I .,s \ H i '\ I \ ~ J o,,,l ; 1_ - I I !!! -I ! () ...- ' I 1--· ---l I I I ,, 'I..,. I L _ -_ J -I _. OWN ER: JAMES MORGAN & DEBRA PULFORD PID#-061 1723220022 Bayside Meadow Project Notes: 1. The house types and placement and proposed drivew•ys are for illustrative ~oriy. A detailed certificate of auvey will be p,eparod lo.-each lot. ooolorming 1o tho tho Cily-_..,....,.., 2. Tree Clearing wih be required for the road and stormwater pond a>nstNc:tioo. There are trees sh::Mn in red, tha illustrate trees that may be remo1o1ed for the proposed house and driveway construction. The proposed house ptaoement for L 1 &2 wm be >Nithin the existing on-.tto tree oover. 3. Off-Stte grading will be required for the private ro ad construction. the neoes.sary gradirig easements wil be obtained once the project has preliminary plat approval, since there maybe plan ~. 4. A monument is proposed and a monument easemert 'MN be obtained. 5 . Street· Ru,al Section· s ... S1reet Plan Sheet . D~ch typic:al section 3:1 slope/ 'Z dept,/ 3" Wdlh 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 11-_::D--=-ES::.;IGNER==--i----:--:NO--=-·c.+...;:B;..cY-+....c..DA-'-TE-"--+------REVI_S_IO_N_S ____ ---I USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, ANO/OR CONVEYANCE OF RSM INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISlml AND THAT I AM A DULY REG ISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DRAWN BY RSM CHECKED BY JUU( DATE 01-15-13 ------------SATHRE-BERGQUIST,INC.'sEXPRESSWRITTENAlJTHORIZATION. USEwm-K>UT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQU IST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES R ESULTING FROM 11.LEGITIAATE USE. Robert S . M~stjld . PE. Date: 0/ /t df]. Lie. No. Jd.':0.:1 GENERAL NOTES: OWNER: JAM ES & JULIE DZUBA Y PID#-0611723220023 OWNE R: BRADLEY P ASS PID #-0611723240001 ,.:. __ _ la I _.J L ----i"°' -, ------:21 ------_J z: I i ~o oo:, S o a cx,o000 o ~ OWNER: ERIN SULLIVAN PID #-0611723220024 1. INSTALL SLT FENCE AS SHOWN ON PLAN, AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF ORONO OR DIRECTEO BY THE ENGINEER. PC Exhibit G (/) ~ CL 2. THE WATER QUALITY POND MUST BE EXCAVATED AT THE BEGI NNING OF GRADING OPERATIONS TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY STORM WATER DETENTION DURING CONSTRUCTION. SAND AND SILT MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE PO ND AS NECESSAR Y DURING CONSTRUCTION AND AT THE COMPLETION OF TH E PROJECT. 3. BEGIN GRADING, INSTALL PERFORATED RISER PIPE IN PONDS WHEN PONO GRADING IS COMPLETE. TEMPORARY DRAINAGE PIPE SHALL BE USEC FOR INTERMEDIATE DRAINAGE DURING THE CONS'TRUCTION PERIOD AS NECESSARY AND DIRECTEO BY THE ENGINEER. INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND EXCAVATED PONDS . 4. INSPECT POND, SILT FENCE, AND ROCK ENTRANCE BERM AFTER ALL RAINFALL EVENTS AS REQUIRED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. 5 . LINE ALL PONDS WITH A MINIMUM 3• ORGANIC SOILS & SEED SLOPES BETWEEN NWL AND 100 YR HWL WITH A WATER TOlERANT MIX. (OR AS NOTED) 8 . REMOVE PERFORATEO RISER PIPE WHEN STORM SEWER ANO OUTI.ET STRUCTURE FOR PONOS ARE INSTALLF.D. 7 . POND· 10:1 BENCH (1 FOOT)THEN 3:1 MAX 8. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL STORM WATER INSPECTIONS ACCORDING TO THE MPCA STORM WATER PERMIT. THIS INCLUDES BOTH WEEKLY INSPECTIONS AND INSPECTIONS DONE AFTER A o.s· RAJN EVENT. A COPY OF THE INSPECTION REPORT MUST BE EMAllEO TO THE ENGINEER AND DEVELOPER ON A WEEKl y BASIS. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE ANO MAINTAIN AN EFFECTIVE SILT CONTROL DEVICE. INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN RESTORATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHEO. 10. ALL RETAINING WALLS WILL REQUIRE A STRUCTURAL DESIGN, A BUILDING PERMIT & A FINAL INSPECTION REPORT. 11 . A 1"·2" CRUSHED ROCK ENTRANCE BERM SHALL BE PLACED AT THE SITE ENTRANCE. TO REPLACE SILT FENCE, AND MINIMIZE EROSION ON TO THE STREETS. THE ROCK BERMS SHALL BE THE WIDTH OF THE ENTRANCE AND 2 FEET HIGH WITH 4:1 SLOPES. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM THE BUILDING PAO AND STREET AREAS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ATTEMPT TO PREVENT SOIL MATERIALS FROM LEAVING THE SITE BY EROSION AND VEHICLE WHEEL TRACKING. HE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING OF STREET, BOU LEVARD AND UTILITY FACILITIES THAT RECEIVE ANY ERODED OR TRACKED SOIL MATERIAL OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS OR MATERIAL 14. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREE S TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBlE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTL y LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. CITY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN FILE NO. 31202.070 SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUT H BROADWAY WAYZATA , MN. 553g1 (952) 476-eOOO ORONO, M INNE SOTA GP BA YS IDE M E ADOWS GP I . ., I 6 I I :~·; ·o I ·~ I ·e' •• I ~t rU I ~h I i ~ r.S I ~I ~ ul ®1 (,') I ii IL I td ~~ ~~ I 0 ~ I I I I I I 1 ' --· J . w··---. r 11 ' ' 0: r '-' Ill --1 J l ....... "-~ 1~8 N I .,! I I \.o.JN I I oco::,,, _ \.o.J~c,a._ ----_. --~ ~--~ ii \ I ) I \ ' i \ \ (J --./ L-· l'YIIIJTA•- P\11 B.l!V • 1011.12 AD.•-&.00 K•ao..oo ----------Ye - l---'DE=Sl~GN:..::ER=---<i....:.:;"'4-'Bc.;Y~....;D:::.A;.;.TE=--i~---.......:..:REVIS:;.:::;IO::;.N~S-----1 USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF RSM _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ INFORMATION)OFTHISPRODUCTISSTRICT\.YPROHIBITEDWITHOUT DRAl"IN BY RSM CHECKED BY IOU( D'-TE 01-15-13 SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC .'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION . USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN IUEGITIMATE USE ANO SHALL lttEREBY INDEMNIFY SAlttRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBlllTY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES lttE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEG IT IMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. - I I I I I I I !!! -I I I -I ..,.. ..- ./ V - ,.;;:o , I \I I I~~ \ \. ~~ •' ,~ >-/, ~ V4>!7 -----I_ --7 -V • t LOW ft09IT B.IV • n.. LOW ft09IT IIJTA • .. 10.11 PIIIIIJTA •7.., PYIB.IV •m • AD.• 14.211 K •a11 -----------------11-1/C ; ! ; i FINISHED GRADE a. - -- h -- I HEREBY CERTIFY lttAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIF ICATION WAS P REPARED B Y ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I NA A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER lttE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. SATHRE-BERGQUIST , INC . 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA , MN. 55391 (952)47'5~000 Robert$. Mel" , P .E. Oete: Lie. No. J=4'::0::t PC Exhibit H I ,, I • ... iii L - · - iii i I I I I I '---... ~:, r--- I I I .e :11 .~ , · I ~ - t----- 1 .. 1.5" BITU MI NOUS WEAR COU RSE -MN/DOT SPWEB240B (2360 SPECIFICATION) 3" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE· MN/DOT SPNWB230B (2360 SPECIFICATION) s· CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, MN/DOT 3138" GEOFABRIC, MN/DOT TYPE V, MIRAFI 500X, 80Z/SY NON-WOVEN APPROVED SUB GRADE DESIGN DATA: STREET SECTION: 1.5" SPWEB2408 WE>S>. COURSE (MN DOT 2300) 2 .5" SPNWB230B BASE COURSE (MN DOT 2360) 8" CL 5 AGGREGATE BASE (MN DOT 3138) SUBGRADE FABRIC (BOVSY, NON-WOVEN)(W,ecµ<ed) Vl Vl < 0.. (See Povement Dealgn I R-Velue Design · Haugo Gealecmical OMC>-13) r 1- CITY PROJECT NO. ORONO, MIN NE SOTA 6' (2' wide) C L 7 AGGREGATE SHOULDER CROSS SECTION: 3%CROl"IN 1a PAVEMENT WIDTH 2' AGGREGATE SHOULDER 3:1 DITCH SLOPE 2' TYPICAL DITCH DEPTH 3' TYPICAL DITCH WIDTH INSTALL CULVERTS FOR EACH DRIVEWAY WITH HOME CONSTRUCITON 5025 0 25 50 SCALE IN FEET PRELIMINARY STREET PLAN BAYSIDE MEADOWS 100 FILE NO. 3 1202-070 ST ST ENTRY MONUMENT SEE SHEET 2 Pl.ANTING BE SEESHEET3 ::.:: w w ~ u V) ~ w f---z ~ a.. . .,. I I ! r 1', I ' I '- I ' I \ '-1--1. I I I I I I / I I I I / l // I '-/ I I I I I I I I I I / , // //, ® OWNER: /~ / // PETER & SHARON RENNEBOHM -:,.,-; PID#-06 11 723 2100Q6 / ,,- 1 I r ,-----, I I I I I I /'\ I I I "' I L,-----_J I I I ' \ ( -\._ \ 1 I I I I I " " N lq ~ / I ~ I I I -_I J -) J'G ,__)0 0 / // -3,F - r) J :!: ~., ~· = .. . • I I I L ,, OWNER: ui BRADLEY PASS ~ PID#-06 1172324000 1 • I I I I ' -- --.!~- :=;_----I ,._ ... -: --OOOr-- ~ ' ' \ \ \ \ I I PC Exhibit I ...... __ _ I 1- % § ;- OWNER • / / -....... -o.i: .. ~ ----;;,---<>66----~--------/ ' ' ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ \ JAMES MORG AN & ~tBRA PULFORD PID#-0611721220022 \ \ 50 25 0 25 50 SCAL E IN FEET 1--=:DE::::~c;:IG::,:NE;::R,:__-+"-'NO~,-+--"BY'---l,--.cD"-'ATE=---t-----"-'R"-EV1,..S ___ IONS~------;~~S~~~~~~~=~E~\'n~~~~TlON) DRAWN BY TllW CHECKED BY TOW 100 OWNER: I ( \ \ ' ' ' \ OWNER : JAMES & JU LIE DZUBA Y PID#-0611 723220023 AMERICAN HOM E MORTGAGE PID#-0611 723 220021 Norby & Associates Land scape Architects, Inc . DATE LANOSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION, USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGmMATE US E AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY NORBY & ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCH ITECTS, INC, OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY, NORBY & ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY llLEGmMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESUl TING FROM ILLEGll'MATE USE, ,,__,_,,_,,_ Rv)ll-..,.. ---100 Esst Scoond S1re<1 Chaska. MN 5531 8 (952) 361 -0644 0 1-23-13 OWNER : ERIN SULLI VAN PID H-061 1723220024 PLANTING LEGEND KEY COMMON NAME BOTAN ICAL NAME TREES AL L.nden 'R ed Maple' Ti/Ila americana 'Redmot'Kf EiH Bfack Hills Spn,,ce -Piecea glauca desnats .... , - ' ' ' Q UANTrn\SIZE I 7 12.S"BB 7 I TBB HL Honey Locust 'Skvline' G ledftsia tricanthos var inennis 'Skvt j 7 12 .5" BB RM Red Maple Acerruburm 10 2 S"BB SM Sugar Maple Acer saccharom 6 12 .S"BB I CITY PROJECT NO, ' ' \ \ NOTES stra;ght si~le leader stral(Jht sim:ife leader str>lahl 5'11!,le leader strajght ~!e ieacer PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN ORONO, MINNESOTA BAYSIDE MEADOWS FILE NO, 3 1202-070 1 3 / \ \ \ \ 1---- 1 -- I \ \ ~;) I \ -------- ~ BAYSIDE ..i MEADOWS ,ti:~ ~· --- ~ ---~ :.- ~ -~~ ~ -- "--' . - Precast Concrete Cap Stone Veneer Precast Concrete w/ sandblasted letters Precast Concrete Stone Veneer Entry Monument Concept Scale: ;"=1 '-0" ., l--~D~E~~~G!:!!NE~R'---1-!N~D:,_ . .j....!:8:.:_Y4-~D~ATE:.!:....+-_-_-_-_-_-_--'-~!!::e:.:.:IS::.,~:::,:.::,sc... ___________ -l [:~F~l=i~~::?J:~=~=Tl!ii~rsATION) DRAWN BY ----• ------· --------· -----· -·--WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES Jll,j ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL 'IDW -----------------TH EREBY INDEMNI FY NORBY & ASSOCIATES LJll,jDSCAPE ARCHITECTS. INC. OF ALL CHECKED BY RESPONSIBILITY. NORBY & ASSOCIATES LJll,jDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC. RESERVES 'IDW _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _______ •• _ _ TH E RIGHT TO HOLD Jll,jy ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMA TE USE. DATE 0 1-23-13 I \ \ .LJ ..I../ .1. ...I... ~ ...1..i...., ...1.....1 X 1~24.6 4 I I I -- RETAINl"jG WALL TOW: (1023.0) BOW: (1020.0) -- -- ~--'-1 ) I --- -.---- \ X 1018.96 / \ \ Entry Monument Site Plan 10 5 , 0 10 20 "'--~,1\,-"li'----- ~----l:lJ:!L_ ~If:~ Norby & Associates Landscape Architects, Inc. IOO EsstSecond Street Chask•,MN 553 18 (952)36 1-0644 CITY PROJECT NO. ORONO, MINNESOTA SCALE IN FEET NORTH PRELIM INARY LANDSCAPE PLAN BAYSIDE MEADOWS PC Exhibit I~ FILE NO. 31 202-070 2 3 .--=D.:ES=IG~NER=-+=:..+..:B::.;Y'--!-=D::.A::.:TE=-+-----...:.:R::.f:V:.:IS::.ION=::.S _____ -1 usE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, ANO/OR CONVEYANCE OF RSM _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ INFORMATION)OFTHISPROOUCT ISSlRICTl..YPROHIBITEDWITHOUT DRAWN BY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. use WITHOUT RSM CHECKED BY DATE 01-15-13 SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE use ANO SHAU. THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC . OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM M.LEGITMATE USE. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNOER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANO Tl-1AT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LNOER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA Robert S . M~lljtd, PE Date : gjcdfl. Uc. No. Jd&J-1 SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC . 150 SOUTH B ROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 553111 (952) 475-6000 CITY PROJECT NO. ORONO, MINNESOTA 1" = 70' 250' AERIAL SITE PLAN BAYS IDE MEADOWS PC Exhibit J FILE NO. 3 1202-070 AE AE I I I I I I I I I CJ I L>J €1 1 LJ fS I HI C'l. I I I I I I I I I I_ ci)•• <( 0 a:: rt..l 0 Cl) >-A' & CQ -·M ~e---JS.: \ \ I 0 z 0 <( 0 a:: ,--,L------~~~'R,~ >-E- ~ 0 u i ll Ju !~:: '°!N i -~ -:, < " ~ § "' "" :ii >.: ;;-er, :l -' I I I I OWNER: PETER & SHARON RENNEBOHM PID ,11-0611723210005 " " < .,, C: N :<l E <::! h :ii IH e:: >, " co N l ,o~N co I , .. ' -\ w ..J OWNER : TREE PRESERVATION EASEMEN T 4f I I I I I I JAMES MORGAN & DEB RA PULFORD PID,11-06 11723 220022 5025 0 2550 100 SCALE IN FEET DESIGNER ND. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, D ISTRIBUTION, ANO/OR CONVEYANCE OF 1---D-RA'"'R!"-'~-BY--+-'I.O_ ~M 0~13 _ Add-LCoos en,aUonEneml!filS _ ~:~R':..ii~C:d~'i~.lf~~~:E~i~~;;;::~~~;"'~r:,~~EWITHOUT RSM ------------SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY C HECKED BY -•• = = = = = = = = = = = = ~T~~~-'::E~~~~~:t~~~~~~i~:s~:L~l:~~~N!~~l:YILLEGITIMATE "'°' -------------USERORPAATYLEGALLYRESPONSIBLEFORDAMAGESORLOSSES RESULTING DATE _________ -· ____ FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. 01-15-13 OWNER: AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE PID§-0611723220021 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANO THAT I AM A DU LY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Robert S. Mo1:i'd· P.E. Dale: Oi /i d_Q Lie . No. 3-+':(W D 0 OWNER : JAMES & JULIE DZUBAY PID,11-06117232200 23 t-ii.o SATHRE-BERGQU IST, INC. 150 SOU TH BROADWAY WAYZATA. MN. 55391 (952 )476-6000 PC Exhibit K ,.. I I I ... .. , . I ' I I - OWNER: TREE PRESERVATION EASEMENT BRADLEY PASS PID,11-0611723240001 I., \:.i L ---·-·1 I I I I ~ I r 2"'L ,~ j ~-- r---.;--~ J----q,-r~,~ic-=. r --L--90 /'\ / \,.J ~v ) /. "'>' / /, < ~<.<c-/ / \ y;,, / I \ "l.\ //~, I v I t o I ti: I CT • (") C/l c.> I ... "' < 0 i 0 ..,. "' ...J ~ I -r I : B~ 994.o \ I L., rl (~O) I L~ OWNER: ERIN SUWVAN PIDj-0611723220024 I I I J I I · 1 °'- CITY PROJECT NO. ..J ..J ::, O> i!:~ 0 <( 0 -"> UN ··-,,, ffi~~ i~:: ool!~ >-I w '-= a::9 u. 0.. u. ~ ORONO, MINNESOTA SITE CONSERVATION PLAN BAYSIDE MEADOWS FILE NO. 31202-070 CP CP I \ ( I I , I ~ .J ., ~'I J .f r -0 (") m >< :. Q: r+ r 0 259 Feet S 2/14/2013 10:17 AM © Bolton & Menk, Inc . Web GI Railroad City Limits Parcels (1-1 -2 0 13) Bayside Meadows Disclaimer: This dr.twing is neither a legally ::::~d:: o::~ T~:; ii 1ourv~ il~d is not ,~tei:~e:,:oe:ords, inform •tion, a nd d; dnwme:.•s a comp1la t and state officM, and locat ed 1n various Cl:", cour,~~a shown, and is to be use other sources affecti ng th~ The City of Orono is not fo r reference purposes on y. , hP r,.in ..-nr.t.\in ,-ri rP<.nnn<.ih!P for imv m .. rnirou"N"< PC Exhibit N .KjOUIAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY Providing Sound, Balanctd, Compr<htniir,, Natural Rtsourct Solutions Memorandum Date: February 6, 2013 To: Bob Molstad, Sathre-Berquist From: Melissa Barrett, Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company (KES) Re: Site Ecological Summary and Project Recommendations and Division 2 of Orono Conservation Design code-Bays ide Meadows (Wachman Parcel), Orono , MN This memo summaries the natural resource inventory information provided in the January 22, 2013 KES Natural Re so urces Inventory -Bays ide M eadows (Wachman Parcel), Orono, MN (document with figure s and appendices attached). This me mo also provides project recommendations with respect to the site's ecological characteristics and responses to items 1 thru 9 of Divi s ion 2 (Sec. 78-1635) of the Orono Conservation Design code. Site Summary The -13. 75-acre Wachman parcel primarily consists of large hayfield dominated by non-native grasses in the western two-thirds of the site. Mowed lawn dominated by non-native grass and a significant tree stand dominated b y boxelder and common buckthom comprise the northern parcel extension that connects the s ite to Bayside Road. Two significant tree stands dominated by white pine are located in the northeast portion of the site, and along the western property boundary. A final s ignificant tree stand is located in the southeast portion of the site. The western portion of this last significant tree stand contains a large number of diseased/dying American elm trees (Dutch elm di sease) as well as an und e r sto ry of common buckthorn. The re mainder (east and south portion) of this final tree stand is dominated b y sugar maple with le sser amounts of basswood, American elm, boxelder, and ironwood with common buckthorn present in the northern portion. The remainder of the parcel is unmanaged grass land dominated b y Kentucky blue grass, smooth brome, and reed canary grass and wetland dominated by reed canary grass. Trace amounts of invasive/noxious weeds were observed on the site and include: garlic mustard, Canada thi stle , motherwort, and common burdock. 26105 Wild Rose Lane, Shorewood , Minnesota 5533 1, Phone: 952-401-8757 . Fax: 952-401-8798 Previou s ly KES prepared a Natural Resources Inventory (NRI) memo that included a review of the City of Orono Natural Resource s Inventory, a review (and revi s ion) of DNR MLCCS data, a tree survey, a wetland inventory and assessment of wetland buffers, A MN RAM analysis, and an Ecological Management Category review. Two items stood out with this review. First, the woodland located in the southeast portion of the site was reclassified from an oak forest mesic sub-type to a maple basswood forest (DNR MLCCS class ification versus our on-site assessment). This same area was also identified within the Orono NRI Conceptual Greenway Corridor Alignment as containing: I) the potential for a high quality natural community, 2) a conceptual greenway corridor, 3) steep s loping so il s, and 4) other natural and semi-natural communities (high and medium quality natural community remnants also have the potential to support rare species). Based on our on-site assessment of this area we determined that: I) only a portion of this area (the very southeast corner of this woodland) would be con s idered to be high quality, 2) this area will still function as a part of a greenway corridor even after development, 3) it does contain moderately sloping soils/topography, and 4) due to field observed encroachment/invasion of invasive species within the southeast forested area , the presence of rare species is unlikely. The wetland present on the site is not of type or quality to qualify for proactive management or protection. However, Wetland I will benefit from the implementation of a wetland buffer and stormwater protection. Lastly, the site was assessed for C it y of Orono Ecological Management Category (EMC) ratings (City Code Sec. 78-1635(9)(4)), a nd F igure 6 illu strates observed category areas. Level I EMC areas are associated with wetlands and their buffers. Level 3 EMC areas are suitable for stormwater management. No Level 2 EMC areas (ecological opportunity areas) were observed on the s ite. Recommendations Trace amount of invasive/noxious species should be hand pulled at any tim e of the year and thrown away, or spot sprayed with g lyphosate w he n native species are dormant (mid-April or mid-September). Common buckthorn removal should occur wherever common buckthorn is present on the site and s hould follow the methods outlined in Appendix E. The very so utheas t corner of the s ite contains a significant tree stand , of which a portion would be beneficial to pre serve. Only that portion of the tree sta nd t hat does not include invas ive common buckthorn and diseased elms should be preserved (area out s ide of the identified Diseased Tree area shown on Figure 7 of the previous submitted KES memo). This area of the tree stand contains mature, native trees and provide habitat for animals. This tree area cou ld be protected under a tree preservation easement. If possible, the white pine s ignificant tree stand along the western prope rty I ine could be protected under a tree preservati o n easement. Existing vegetation within the designated wetland buffer on the site has a continuous dense layer of perennial grasses that have been unbroken for at least l O consecutive years. Buffer adjacent to Wetland I should not be disturbed by construction activities. Buffer augmentation or vegetative restoration within the buffer is not proposed as this type of physical disturbance often increases the amount of invasive/noxious weeds in this location and throughout the site. The on-site wetland and adjacent buffer must be protected under an easement. Steeply sloping soils in the northeast p011ion of the property should be place under conservation easement to protect them from potential vegetation alteration (conversion to lawn) and erosion. Sec. 78-1635. Basic Conservation Design Master Plan requirements and evaluation criteria As stated in the code -"The developer shall prepare a Conservation Design Master Plan for development of the property, consisting of written and visual documentation including maps in an acceptable electronic format , addressing the following topics: (I) Consideration of the existing drainage system; Pre and post de velopment topography is not s ig nificantly differe nt; th e refore, s urfa ce runoff on and from the s ite w ill not s ignifi ca ntl y chang e . (2) Establishment of a stormwater management system, using multi-cell treatment principles, and defining proposed methods of stormwater phosphorus reduction; One storm wate r po nd t o treat impe rv io us s urfa c e runo ff is proposed. (3) R e moval of invasive species and di seased trees ; T hat maj orit y of in vasive s pecies (i.e. common buc kth o rn ) and di sea sed t rees (i.e. di s ease d Ameri ca n e lm) a re o nl y prese nt in the so utheas t porti o n of th e s it e (Figure 7 KES Natura l Reso urces In ve nto ry -Bays id e M ead o ws (Wac hman Parcel). Orono, MN). Removal of in vasive s pec ies in th e so utheast portion o f th e s ite w ill be accompli s hed b y the land o wne r that purc hase s that lot. Many di seased /dyin g/in vas ive trees will lik e ly be re m oved with the cons tru ct io n o f the ho me -a s that is w here man y of those trees are located . The metho d s for commo n bu c kth o rn removal we re inclu de d in Appe ndix E of th e prev ious s ubmitted KE S m e m o . Co mmo n buckth o rn locat ed w ithin the n o rth po rtion o f the s ite w ill he remove d fo r roadway cons tru cti o n. Trac.:e a mo unt s of commo n in vasi ve/no x io us wee d s are present in th e eas t third of th e site and in c lud e: garli c mus tard , Can ad a thi stle . mo th e r wo rt , and co mmo n burdo c k . ( 4) Protection of s ignificant tree stands and woodlands that s upport scenic and/or ecolog ical goal s, including mitig ation of any s uch s tands to be impacted b y deve lopment activities. The ve ry so uth east co rner o f the s ite cont ain s a s ig nificant tree s tand , o f vv hi c h a po rt io n wo uld be ben e ficial to pre ser ve . Only th a t porti o n of the tree s tand that does not includ e in v as iv e common bucktho rn a nd di seased e lm s s ho uld be prese r ved (a rea o uts id e of th e id entified Di seased T ree a rea s how n o n F ig ure 7 of th e prev ious s ubmitte d KES memo). This area of the tree s tand co nt a in s mature nati ve trees and p rov id e habitat for a nim a ls. A dditi o nall y, the s ign ifi can t t ree s tand dominated b y w hi te pine al o n g the western prope rty line would b e b eneficial to preser ve as it provides bird habi tat and a natural sc re e n to the adjacent property. (5) Protection of existing wetlands, including augmentation of buffers, mitigation of impacts, and enhancement of degraded systems The ex isting o n-site wetland will not be impacted. Furthermore it w ill h ave an undi sturbed buffe r along the entire wetl a nd e d ge. Existin g ,..vctland buffer o n th e s ite h as a co ntinu ous dense la ye r of perennial g rasses that h ave been unbroken fo r a t lea st IO con sec uti ve year s . Buffer adjacent to Wetland I w ill n ot b e di s turbed b y con stru ct io n activities; therefore , no buffer augmentatio n o r enhancement is n eeded. The wet land buffe r w ill b e protected und e r a n easem ent. (6) Justification and mitigation of any negative impact to ecological commu111t1es. "Negative impact" includes any modification to a lower level of ecological community quality, as described by the Minnesota Land Cover Classification Sys tem (M-34X Modifiers); T h e proposed development of the s ite w ill n ot result in a ny n egative impact to ecological co mmuniti es (i.e. no modificati o n to a lower leve l of ecological com muni ty q uality a s described by the MLCCS M-34X m od ifi e r ; C it y Code Sec. 78-1635(6)). The hom e lots that wi ll b e located near or w ithin the so ut h east ma p le basswood fo rest vv ill lik e ly b e located c lose to th e roadway w here th e hi g hest concentratio n of co mmon b uckth o rn and d isea sed trees we re obser ved. (7) Maintenance of ecological c o nnecti ons through s ite design , as s hown on the Orono Natural Resource Inve ntory; No eco logica l conn ecti o n s wi ll be seve red by t h e proposed project. The south east portion o f th e s ite is s h own as part of a pote nti a l g r een way corridor. T h e majority of' this portion of the s ite wi ll b e unto uc he d by the proj ect. It is li ke ly that th e hom e to be co nstru cted w it hin t hi s part of th e s ite w ill b e located near th e roadway (northwes t part of th e so ut he a st wood la nd area). Furthe rmo re. t h e h o m e ,;v iii lik e ly b e wi thin wood land area that needs to have m any d is ea se d . dead trees, a nd common b uckthorn re m oved. (8) Maintenance and protection of ex isting pos itive views, and mitigation of any exi sting or proposed n egati ve views us ing appropriate measures s uc h as s ite layo ut, screening, building des ig n and col orati o n , etc.; and There is a di stant v iew of the North Arm of Lake M inne t o n ka fro m th e very n orth e rn part of t he s ite. No homes w ill be locat e d between thi s a rea (whi c h w ill beco m e a roadway) a nd the aforementio ned view. A dditionall y . the Wachman p arcel is locat ed lower o n the landscape than adj acent properti es to the north w hi c h c urrent ly have a lake v ie vv. T h e refore, proposed ho mes w ill n ot .. block" a ny ex is tin g v iews . P h otos a re in c lud ed with thi s m e m o. (9) Preservation or reinterpretation of existing landmarks. NA Looking to the s outheast from the northwest corner of the s ite. • Lo o king t o th e so uth fr om th e north portio n of the s ite . Looking t o th e e as t at the we tl and in the eas t cent ral portion of the s it e. C ommon buckthorn in s outheast tree a rea. Common buckthorn in no rtheast corne r of s it e. Note : Site boundaries on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. 29 i 12 . -- 19 ~() -s:,<l-"i d :., 110 ~ Site Location I l.!J\·~ic'e Fl o =~======--· D 8 4 N Au n ~r 19 ~rt r o est Saga Hill d ~. 110 Jennings Bay tv SJ;o 't.~ l>r C ·"i.: (5 '"O Wes! Arm ch iake ii3 "' Hamsons Boy .., t l :,·n wo,,u B Ive! i: C i: S011 n ( Pa, I( V t-_)i /itl~-f iOII ~/l o:...ind ..., Seton I l1'P I t'IYD Dl,,6'-t, Lake las , l'tt'a yz.:i t,i Blvd W J t ') tl 0 St ub bs Bay ~ ?<., ~~ ,taxwell Nortl"• '"t. nay Arm 51 _rystol Boy .-u~ SI ~; z z Mm net nr k :i 8t> .. h S ho:el ir e D r Lato '1 JJ 1~6 ::: ,: ,;; ..... "C ..,.. E <:.Se:, ','<' Crysta I Ba 1• 15 © ;;,:,,2 t,l i:r:,:~fl C::irr,:ir;.ti:,r, ·~ ,1~;2 lfor.i;; Figure 1 -Site Location Map .KjOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES C OMPANY Wachman Parcel (KES No. 2012-068) Orono, Minnesota No Scale NORTH DESIGN DATA; ZONING: RR-1 B MIN LOT AREA: 2.0 AC MIN LOTWtDTH; 200 FT FYS8 • 50 FT SYSB -30 FT SYSB STRT • 50 FT RYSB-50 FT 0 MAX COS LENGTH -1000 FT ·-MIN CURVE 275 FT PREPARED FOR GONYEA HOMES CO NTACT; TYLER WENKUS 76:l-432-4502 EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROX IMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY ANO ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULL Y RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND All DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY ANO A l l EXISTING UTILITIES. 100 50 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 200 I HEREBY CE RTIFY THAT THIS P LAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME O R UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVIS IO N AND THAT I AM A DUL Y REG ISTERED PROFESS101'W.. ENGINEER UNDER TH E LAWS OF THE ST A TE OF MINNESOTA. ------------DATE _______ REG "NO ----- REVISIONS BY ______ ,u. N I-"' e Cf) '" .., "' ::) "' z a ::;; (9 I 0::: w co >-<{ I 3: w 0 <{ 0::: 0 er: I co I I-I-::, <( 0 en Cf) 0 "' r 0... _J <( ~ w ~ z () 0 Cf) 0::: LJ.J 0 <( en ~ i== w <( o._ z 0 (.) z z I 0 <( ~ <( _J LJ.J 0 2 () >-z I z z <( () 0 0 _J c:: (!) f-<( 0 LJ.J s s .. , DRAWN " R SM C HEC KED XXX DATE 10-1S-12 SC AL E AS SHOWN JOSNO. 31202-070 F ILE : BASE_WACH.OWG SHEET W et ,.oF SHEE TS--' Notes: See tex t for MLCCS (lulc_mlccspy3) description. All boundaries on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Figure 3 -2005 DNR MLCCS Map (DNR Data Deli) &2010 Aerial Photograph ~ Kf OLJ-IAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY ------- Wachman Parcel Orono (KES No . 2012-068) Orono, Minnesota +N 1 inch -207 feet Notes: See text for MLCCS description. All boundaries on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Legend CJ Site Boundary Altered Forest Conifers ...- Grassland Hayfield Maple Basswood Forest Figure 4 -Revised MLCCS Map per KES Natural Resource Inventory (2010 Aerial Photograph) .Kf OLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL S ERVI CES C OMPANY Wachman Parcel Orono (KES No. 2012-068) Orono, Minnesota 1 inch -207 feet Notes: All boundaries on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Legend ,. C:=J Site Boundary STS Figure 5 -Significant Tree Stands (STS) (2010 Aerial Photograph) ~ ~) .Kf oLHAuc ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY -- Wachman Parcel Orono (KES No. 2012-068) Orono, Minnesota +N 1 inch -207 feet ..-.......-_.. Notes: See text for EMC categories and description. All boundari es on t h is figure a r e approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. F igure 6 -E cological Management Categor ies (EMC) (20 10 Aerial P hot ograph) ~ l\JOLHAUG ENVJRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY ----- W achman P arcel Orono (KES No . 2012-068) Orono, Minnesota 1 inch -207 feet ~ Notes: All boundaries on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Diseased Trees C:=J Site Boundary Common Bucklhorn Figure 7 -Invasive Species Management & Diseased Tree Removal Area (2010 Aerial Photograph) ~ ~) Kf oLHAuc ENVIRONMENT AL S ERV IC E S COMPANY -------- Wachman Parcel Orono (KES No. 2012-068) Orono, Minnesota 1 inch -207 feet IqOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY Providing Sound, Balanctd, Comprthtnsio, Natural Rtsourct Solutions Memorandum Date: January 22, 2013 To: Bob Molstad, Sathre-Berquist From: Melissa Barrett, Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company Re: Natural Resources Inventory -Bayside Meadows (Wachman Parcel), Orono , MN The -13.75-acre Wachman Parcel is located in Section 6, Township l l 7N, Range 23W, City of Orono , Hennepin County, Minnesota, south of Bayside Road, and south of the addresses of 4665 and 4645 Bayside Road (Figure 1). On January 3, 2013 KES visited the Wachman Parcel to complete a tree survey and document other natural resources information for use in preparing the Conservation Master Plan . Kjolhaug Environmental Services (KES) has completed a number of environmental related items to be used in future planning. Items completed included (1) a basic Natural Resources Inventory as outlined in Section 78-1634(4) of the Orono City Code, (2) an invas ive species and di s eased tree removal p lan , and (3) mapping and review of Orono Ecological Management Categories. Previously in 2012 , KES completed a wetland delineation on the site (Figure 2) which was s ubsequently reviewed by Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The Notice of Application (comment period) for the wetland delineation review ends on January 22, 2013 (Appendix A). After that time a Notice of Decision approving the wetland boundary can be issued by the watershed di strict. Natural Resources Inventory City of Orono Natural Resources Inventory -The 2006 City or Orono Natural Re sources Inventory prepared by Hennepin Conservation District was reviewed . Land Cover Classification Level 1 and Level 3 assessments showed artificial surfaces, planted or cultivated ve getation, forest, and shrubland within s ite boundaries. No areas identified by the Minnesota Biological Survey were shown within s ite boundaries. A natural a rea comprised of oak forest (mesic subtype) was id e ntified in the southeast corner of the s ite. This same area of the s ite was identified by the Conceptual Greenway Corridor Alignment as containing: I) the potential for a 26105 Wild Rose Lane , Shorewood , Minnesota 55331 , Phone: 952-401 -8757, Fax: 952-401 -8798 high quality natural community, 2) a conceptual greenway corridor, 3) steep sloping soils, and 4) other natural and semi-natural communities. High and medium quality natural community remnants also have the potential to support rare species. The inventory did not identify any specific need for proactive management or protection for the site. The wetland present on the site is not of type or quality to qualify for proactive management or protection. However, Wetland I will benefit from the implementation of a wetland buffer and stormwater protection. Due to field observed encroachment/invasion of invasive species within the southeast forested area, the presence of rare species is unlikely. Figures for all items listed above can be found in Appendix B. For reference, the full Orono Natural Resources Inventory document is available online at: http://www.hennepin.us/portal/site/HennepinUS/menuitem.b I ab7547l750e40fa01dfb47ccf0649 8/?vgnextoid=61 b2b556b89332 l OV gn VCM l 00000491 I 4689RCRD Review and Revision of DNR MLCCS Data -Current DNR Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) inventory data for the site was downloaded and reviewed for accuracy (Figure 3). A revised MLCCS map incorporating KES field observations is provided in Figure 4. Attached Table 1 outlines in detail DNR data and KES field verified data. Modifier M 34X has been included , as has the modifier for common buckthorn (M-408). Little to no garlic mustard was observed on the site. Data sets are similar in that they both identify hayfield, grassland, and forest. KES was able to modify specific land cover boundaries base d on known wetland boundaries and field verified land cover. The most drastic land cover change would be the reclass ification of the southeast corner from an oak forest mesic subtype to a maple basswood fore s t. KES field verified data al so provides more accurate information regarding invasive species coverage a nd location. Based on our assessment, proposed development of the s ite will not result in any negative impact to ecological communities (i.e. no modification to a lower level of ecological community quality as described by the MLCCS M-34X modifier; City Code Sec. 78-1635(6)). The home lots that will be located near or within the so uth east maple basswood forest will likely be located close to the roadway where the highest concentration of common buckthorn and diseased trees were observed. Tree Survey -Tree ID number, diameter breast hei g ht (DBH), and s pecies name for trees tagged during the tree survey are provided in Appendix C. Generally, trees were located within areas identified as altered forest, conifers, and maple basswo od forest on Figure 4; however, some s cattered tree s were located in the hayfield. Four s ignificant tree stands (STS) are located on the s ite and are labeled as s hown in Figure 5. These tree stands c o rrespond to areas identified as altered forest , conifers, and maple basswood forest on the 2012 MLCCS land cover inventory. Wetland Inventory and Wetland Buffers -A wetland delineation was completed on the s ite in 2012 by KES. The repo11 identified one wetland (Wetland I) within s ite boundaries (Figure 2). Originally, Wetland I on the site was given a protection classification of Preserve by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) inventory. In January 2013 KES completed a MNRAM functional analysis for Wetland 1. Based on the analysis results, a revised protection classification of Manage 2 was determined. MCWD approved the management classification change on January 17 , 2013 (Appendix D). Minnehaha Creek Water District (MCWD) revised their Wetland Protection Rule in September 2010. Similar to City of Orono rules, buffers widths are based on the management class of the wetland as determined by a functional analysis. However, MCWD base buffer widths are generally wider than City designated widths. The more restrictive of the widths must be represented on the grading plan. Wetland Buffer Protection, Augmentation, and Enhancement -Existing wetland buffers on the site have a continuous dense layer of perennial grasses that have been unbroken for at least I 0 consecutive years. Buffer adjacent to Wetland 1 will not be disturbed by construction activities; therefore, no buffer augmentation or enhancement is needed. Ecological Management Category Review -The site was assessed for City of Orono Ecological Management Category (EMC) ratings (City Code Sec. 78-1635(9)( 4)), and Figure 6 illustrates observed category areas. Level I EMC areas are associated with wetlands and their buffers. Level 3 E M C areas are suitable for stormwater manage ment. No Level 2 E MC areas (ecological opportunity areas) were observed on the s ite. Invasive Species and Diseased Tree Removal Plan Invasive Species Removal and Management Plan -Areas with invas ive species observed on the site are illustrated in Figure 7. The primary invasive s pecies identified on the s ite was common buckthorn. A detailed common buckthorn management plan is included in Appendix E. Trace amounts of other non-native, invas ive species were observed (common mullein, motherwot1 , garlic mustard). Future seeding of inva s ive s pecies management areas (outside of the graded home lots) is not anticipated because cut stump treatment and foliar spray ing of buckthorn and other trace invas ive s pecies should not result in bare soil or un-vegetated areas. As invas ive species comprise le ss a nd le ss cover over time, native species are 'released'. Native species that have been dormant under the canopy of invas ives are expected to naturall y come back on their own. Although not preci se ly measured , buckthorn trees observed on the s ite represented approximately 99% of the total invasive cover. Buckthorn shrubs less than 1.5 inches in diameter will likel y b e foliar treated. Buckthorn trees greater than 1.5 inches in diameter should be stump cut, and their trunks and branches should be chipped or hauled off the s ite. Diseased and Dying Tree Removal Plan -Tree ID number, diameter breast hei g ht (DBH), and species and for all trees tagged during the field tree survey are induced in Appendix C. Diseased or dying trees identified for removal (49 in total) are primarily located in the diseased tree area shown on Figure 7. However, some dead white pine trees were also present in the conifer areas. Diseased/dead trees identified for removal are hazard trees in poor to dead/dying condition and are in locations that would endanger property and/or other trees. Due to their exiting low quality, mitigation for these trees is not proposed. Mitigation for any snags removed from within the building area would not require mitigation as snags are dead trees. However, snags outside of the building area do not pose a hazard and can provide valuable wildlife habitat to a wide variety of birds and mammals and should left in place. Many of the larger sugar maples in the very southeast portion of the site have numerous cavities , and barred owl feathers were observed. These trees should be left in place unless they pose a hazard to the building sites. Tree Protection and Mitigation Plan -The exact trees that will be removed due to home construction is unknown at this time. Therefore a mitigation plan for impacts to healthy trees has not been provided with this memo . When assessing tree impacts in the future , boxelder trees s hould be considered to be an invasive native species and therefore should not require mitigation. TABLE 1-MLCCS Existing and Revised -Wachman P arcel 2005 DNR MLCCS I nventory Data MLCCS Alphanumeric Code MLCCS Definition Code 24217 2.ch.GN .pUS.cHF Hayfield 52130 5.de. UP.nA T Altered/non-native dominated upland shrubland 32112 3.de.UP.nOA.nOM Oak fores t mesic subtype 62140 6 .gt.GD.Nat Grassland with s pa rse dec iduous trees -altered/non- native dominated vegetation 42130 4.de.UP.nAT A ltered/non-nati ve dominated deciduous woodland 32150 3 .de.UP.nMB Maple-basswood forest (northeast part property) 32150 3.de.UP.nMB Maple-basswood forest (south property line) 13124 I .hh.CT.i25.cGS S hort grasses and mixed trees wi th 11-15% im pervious cover 13134 1.hh.CT.i50.cGS Short g rasses an d mixed trees w ith 26-50% impervious cover 2012 Kjolhaug Environmental Natural Resource Inventory Observations MLCCS MLCCS Definition Code Alphanumeric Code 24217 2.ch .GN.oUS.c HF Havfield 32150 3.de.UP.nMB Maole Basswood Forest 62140 6.gt.GD.nAT Grassland with sparse deciduous trees -altered/non- n ative dominated vegetation 61420 6.ge. WB.n WM Wet Meadow Wetland 32170 3.de.UP.nAT. A ltered/non-native deciduous fo rest 21300 2.tt.CM. Planted, maintained or cult iv at ed mi xed con iferou s and deciduous trees Modifier Definition M 34X Quality of natural community ( see table on following page for val ue s defini t ion) M 2XX Cultural land us e (values are 2 10 to 276) M 408 Common buckthorn (* see table on following page for va lues d efinition) Modifier Modifier M 34X M 2XX blank 276 blank B blank blank C D blank b lank Mo difier Modifier M_34X M 2XX NN 276 B NN NA D NA Mo difier Approximate M_408 acres on-site 7.98 3 1.96 2 2 .3 4 0.08 0.15 3 0.1 1 6 0.30 0.35 0.48 Total= 13 .75 Mo difier Approximate M_408 acres o n-site 2 8 .5 3 2.5 2 1.5 0.5 5 0.15 0.6 Total = 13. 75 Continued on next page TABLE 1 (continued) M_34X Natural Plant Quality Modifier Values Cover Class/Estimated Percent Cover for Invasive Species Modifiers Cover ClassNalue Definition A Highest quality natural commu nity, no disturbances and natural processes intact. Good quality natural community. Has its natural B process e s intact, but shows signs of past human impacts. Low levels of exotics. Moderate condition natural community with obvious past C disturbance but is still clearly recognizable as a native community. Poor condition of a natural com munity . Includes some D natives, but is dominated by no n-natives and/or is widely dis turbed and a ltered. NA Native species present in an altered / non-native plant commun ity. Altered I non-native plant com munity. These semi- NN natura l com m unities do n ot qualify fo r natural quality ranking. M_ 408 Common Buckthorn Cover Modifier Values Cover Class/Estimated Percent Cover for Invasive Species Modifiers Cover ClassNalue Definition 0 U nknown or not observed I Obse rved, unknown quantity 2 I -5% Cover 3 6 -25 % Cover 4 26 -50% Cover 5 51 -75% C over 6 76 -100% Cover APPENDIX A Bayside Meadows, Orono, MN Minnesota Wetland ConsetVation Act Notice of Application Local Government Unit (LOU) Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Address 18202 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Project Name Date of Bill Coffman Wachman Parcel Application 10/22/12 (completed 12/5/12) Type of Apolication (check all that apply): Application Number W12-52 [gJ Wetland Boundary or Type D No-Loss D Exemption D Banking Plan D Sequencing D Replacement P lan B ill Coffman has appli ed for wetland bounda1y & type approval for the parcel located approximately 400 feet sout h of Bayside Road and south of 4665 & 4645 Bayside Road (PID #0611723220018). The application was received on October 22, 2012 and completed on December 5, 2012. The delineation was performed by Kjo l haug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (KES) on October 12, 2012. The boundaty was reviewed in the fie ld on November 2 1, 2012 by MCWD staff. 2. APPLICATION REVIEW AND DECISION Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 3 provides notice that an application was made to the LOU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. A copy of the application is attached . Comments can be submitted to: Name and Title of LOU Contact Person Comments must be received by (minimum 15 Catherine Bach business-day comment period): District Technician January 22, 2012 (4:30 PM) Address (if different than LGU) Date, time, and location of decision: 18202 Minnetonka Blvd A decision will be made following completion of Deephaven, MN 55391 the comment period. Phone Number and E-mail Address Decision-maker for this application: (952) 641-4504 (2J Staff cbach@minnehahacreek.org D Governing Board or Council Date: '1ju /1 v BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page I of 2 3. LIST OF ADDRESSEES !2J SWCD TEP member: Stacey Lijewski -stacey.lijcwslci@co.henncpin.mn.us [gl BWSR TEP member: Lynda Peterson -Jynda.pctcrson@state.mn.us 0 LOU TEP member (if different than LOU Contact): 0 DNR TEP member: [gl DNR Regional Office (if different than DNR TEP member): Melissa Doperalsld - Melissa.Doperalski@statc.mn.us 0 WD or WMO (if applicable): [gl Applicant (notice only) and Landowner (if different): Bill Coffman -billcoffman@cbburnet.com [gl Members of the public who requested notice (notice only): Consultant: KES (Melissa Barrett) -Melissa@kjolhaugenv.eom City: Christine Mattson -emattson@ci.orono.mn.us [gl Corps of Engineers Project Manager (notice only): Melissa Jenny-Mclissa.m.jenny@usace.army.mil 0 BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator (wetland bank plan applications only) 4. MAILING INFORMATION >Fora list ofBWSR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/contact/WCA areas.pdf >Fora list ofDNR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.rnn.us/wetlands/wca/DNR TEP contacts.pdf >D fN atura epartment o IR I Offi esources Reg10na ices: NW Region: NE Region: Central Region : Southern Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. As sess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ec ol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources 2115 Birclunont Beach Rd . NE 1201 E. Hwy. 2 1200 Warner Road 261 Hwy. 15 South Bemidii, MN 56601 Grand Rapids, MN 55744 St. Paul, MN 55106 New Ulm, MN 56073 For a map ofDNR Administrative Regions, see: http ://files.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dnr regions.pdf >Fora list of Corps of Project Managers: www.mvp.usace.army.mil/regulatory/default.asp?pageid=687 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District, ATTN: OP-R 180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700 St. Paul, MN 55101-1678 > For Wetland Bank Plan applications, also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 5. ATTACHMENTS In addition to the application, li st any other attachments: D D D D D BWSR Fo rm s 7-1-10 Page 2 of2 APPENDIX B Bayside Meadows, Orono, MN Land Cover C lassification • Level 1 Ci t y of Orono La nd Cover Cla ssification a nd Natura l Resources In ventory Legend Cl City Bou ndary 40000 Woocland -50000 Shru!Jl and Land Co ver C lass1r1ca lion -Leve l 1 60000 Herl)..1cous D No L.m<I cover Classification d;;it;;i rec this ;;ir e;;i 70000 Nonv;;iscular 1000 0 Art;fi ci;;il Surfaces and Assoaated Areas -80000 Sparse Vegetation 20000 P l.:mtect or Cul ti vated Vegetation -90000 Water • 3000 0 Forests City of Orono -Land C over Classification and Natural Resourc e In ventory March 2006 0 2.250 4,500 9.000 Feet I inc h equ als 4 5CO f eet Figure 6 19 Land Cover Classification -Level 3 City of Oro no Land Cover Class1ficati on an d Natura l Re sources Inventory Legend c::J City Bounamy CJ 40000 Wood land D 500 00 Shrubland "Color Cate go ries f0< Le·,el 3 Land Co,-e r Ctassifit.:1tion D 60000 He r'Jacous D 70000 Nonvascu lar D 10 000 Artifi cial Surfa ces and Assooated Areas -aoooo s;iarse Vege tati on D 20000 Planteo or Cultivated Vegeta:ion -90000 water -30000 Forest s • Complete Leve l 3 Legend on next page . City of Orono -Land C over Classification and Natura l Resource In ven tory March 2006 0 2,250 4500 9.000 Feet I in ch equal s 4.5(){) feet Figure 7 20 Natural Areas and Communitiy ID Numbers City of Oro no Land Cover C lass i fica tion and Na tural Resources Inventory City of Orono -Land Cover Classification and Natural Resource Inventory March 2006 23 Legend c::::J City B0undar1 Nat ural Co mmuni ty T ype -1 T amarack s·t,a mp -2 Tama ra ck s·,,amp m inerot rophi c subtype 3 Oa k forest 11 Mi xed hard ..... ood swamp 12 Aspen forest. sat u ra te d soi ls 13 Black ash s·:1am p . seasona ll y f ooded 1 4 r~:i xed hard·:,oo d S'.'la mp . s easona l y flooded -15 Upl an d mi xed co nife ro L1s-dec iduous for est -16 Oak woodland-brushland 17 Nati'~e dominated ten p orari l y flooded sh r u b land 18 Poor f en sh r ub subty pe 19 Ri ch fen sh rub subtype 20 Sh rub s..v~mp seepage subtype 25 f,:es c prairie 26 '/~et n eaoo.,... 27 Poor fen sedge s ubtype 28 Reh fen 33 Catt ai l m arsh· semiper manentl y f loo ded 3'1 Mi x ed emergent marsh 35 '•1\'et n·eado·N • sem 1pe 'manently flooded 36 Cattai l n arsh • inte·mrt t ently exposed -37 Cattai l marsh · permanenty flooded -38 •1Vate r il y open marsh -39 l 1mneti c open water 40 Pe rmanently f ooded aqua! c bed -4 ·1 Pa us tr ne open ..... a ter .. EOO 3,:oo E,,40() =eet 1 inc h eq~als ~ .. :.Jo fee: F igure 8 Legend c::J City Boundary __ Steep Slope Soils • ONR Scientific and Natural Areas • Reg1cna1 Parks Conceptual Greenway Corridor __ Adjacent G reenway Corridors --Streams @ Exi sting wenands 100 Year Floodplain Natu ral Community Quality Q HignOUa lity Medium Q uality otner Natural and Se mi-Natu ral Conmunitles City of Orono -Land Cover Classification and Na tural Resource In ventory March 2006 0 2,2 5-0 4.5 00 9,000 Feet 1 inch equ als 4.:,0{) feet Figure 9 23 County Biological Survey Sites City of Oro no Land Cover Clas sifica ti on a nd Natura l Resou rces Inv en tory • c:::I C t'j 60..r.d.1 ·, CBS 8 ~c ive r~ty ~.l"l liii",J ler Ott+•$ IU c::loJr,-•~c ,110 Hil:"'I t.tCCER,-e EEL0',11 ',t 1 •• r.1ut.1 ov:~:1·v s T;.,\ID.C..F:•s Logend C~H.lf":'f e ;c io~)I s~·-...y 1~3'..r.JJ ::~n mi,,:"\I~ H I • A;:::H FOR :s- C :.s=:.1-1 ~\>00:> ... !..N) r--E.~CY. ASH S'.'.'.:..1,I? .C:: ::.A n >-• .. r.t,,:.:J- l J ·W CA.'\ ';.l.\'~H'JA c :i,v :;~_.:.~1: -E\1ER6ENT l..'!o.R~,; C FLooo=_;.,., :::Re.s,. ,;J.:.;iw::oo ~-.•,A.YP FC;;EsT CJ .O"i','L A.\C 1-o.A,c wooo F'O~:s -m ',IAPL :-::..~~WOOJ F::~..:n 1E i3 ',\·::OC~, c::I \1ES.C -tA~C-,'iCOO FOP.ES .. S YS T:',I ',IESrC ::,1.;.: SAV..:..'N1-1::E\IB;._i -\tESC :~,.\ ~ E c:::1 •,11.x::, :1.1eRc~e nr r.•.:.RH :rCP.:zr. t:i ',t:x::i ~:;,C".'1000 5~·\'A.VP City of Orono -Land Co ver Classification and Natural Resource Inventory March 2006 0 2.250 4,500 1 inc h equals 4.500 f&et -OAK =ORE~.- -O~K w coc_:..r,.c .EP .. •S-LAHJ 1E IG 1,•.00 0~1 -POOR FEH !;.ECG :'. C: .. UE-y'PE 9.000 Feet -RED OAK -S ~GAR 1/ . .:..PlE. :k ':.S\·\'O::i . ;Eli:.=t\_ T -:. ... ::'RY: =:.~EST RtC H F:•. •T~A\13 TIO H, -RtCH F:~ (P ;..\j,3 -toH, Sh P. • .i~ SU~7YPE -,ECGE ~•:; )::','; -SEEPAGE VEACOW 1SOOTH:.?Ji; -$!-?.UB S','iAl.~P -S .. VEP. 1.u._:::n .. E-,:V ~Ge\,:.:..~::=:~: FL-::O)=LA,'\ =;~ST -$ .. VER t.tA:il E-GRE Et,,, A.Sr -:.VTTC".','iOOD -~.R:..CE FC"ESi -sua:..R MJl :IL E FCRE ST ·.=1::: wo::::,si -TAY.AR ~::" $~VP.VP 1't:Tt.1 :A:,:'1 \·.._ Figu re 5 9 APPENDIXC Bayside Meadows, Orono, MN Tree ID Diameter Species Condition/Health Propos ed for Require s (inches ) Re moval Mitig ation I 12 White pine 2 10 White pine -, 9 White pine .) 4 6 White pine 5 7 White pine 6 8 White pine 7 10 White pine 8 6 White pine 9 11 White pine IO 8 White pine dead -.J No 11 13 White pine 12 11 White pine 13 9 White pine 14 12 White pine 15 l l White pine 16 10 White pine 17 5 White pine dead -.J No 18 14 White pine 19 9 White pine 20 9 White pine 21 11 White pine 22 10 White pine 23 11 White pin e 24 9 White pin e 25 8 White pine 26 7 White pine 27 6 White pine d ead -.J N o 28 8 White pine d e ad ,J No 29 9 White pine 30 IO White pine 31 7 White pine 32 8 White pine 33 6 White pine 34 7 White pine 35 8 White pine 36 IO White pine 37 9 White pine 38 10 White pine 39 10 White pine 40 10 White pine 4 1 12 White p ine 42 12 White pine 43 9 White pine 44 8 White pine Tree ID Diamete r Species Conditi o n/Health Prop osed fo r Req ui res (inc hes) Re moval Mi tigat io n 45 8 W hite pine 46 3 Re d cedar Gun ipe r) 47 6 W hite p in e dead '1 No 48 26 A merican e lm dead, two trunks '1 No 49 10 White pi ne 50 11 W hite p ine 5 1 9 W hite pi ne 52 IO W hi te pine 53 11 W hi te pine 54 4 W hi te pine dead '1 No 55 11 W hi te p i ne 56 9 Whi te pine 57 11 W hi te pin e 58 10 Whi te pi ne 59 11 W hite pine 60 12 C raba ppl e 3 to 4 m a in trunks 6 1 12 Red cedar Gu n i pe r) 62 6 Commo n bucktho rn multi trunks '1 No 63 15 Red cedar Gun i per) multi tru nks 64 9 Red cedar Gun i per) mul ti trunks 65 11 White pine 66 I O Whi te pi ne 67 10 W hite pi n e 68 11 W h ite pi ne 69 5 W hite p ine dead '1 No 70 11 W hi te p ine 7 1 14 Colorado blue spruce 72 7 Boxelder 73 8 Boxelder 74 28 Boxeld e r 75 15 Colorad o b lue spruce 76 18 Colorado bl ue spruce 77 11 Colorado b l ue spruce 78 16 Colorado blue spruce 79 8 Boxeld e r 80 9 Boxeld er 8 1 17 Ame ri can e l m 82 14 Boxelder 83 16 Boxelder dead core '1 No 84 16 Boxelder dam aged crown '1 No 85 18 Boxelder dead/co re rot '1 No 86 12 W hi te s pruce 87 12 Co lorado b l ue spruce 88 IO Colorado b l ue spruce Tree ID Diameter Species Conditi on/Health Proposed for Requires (inches) Removal Mitigation 89 11 White spruce 90 9 White spruce 9 1 9 White spruce 92 10 Whit e sp ruce 93 20 Boxelder 94 see notes Crabappl e multi trunks 95 15 A m e ric a n e lm diseased -J No 96 11 Ameri can e lm 97 12 American e lm diseased -J No 98 8 America n elm d iseased/dying ,I No 99 9 American elm diseased /dying -J No 100 12 Green ash 101 10 Sugar mapl e 102 12 Boxelder 10 3 7 Sugar maple diseased -J No 104 10 unknown dead -J No 105 6 Boxelder 106 7 Sugar maple 107 6 BE 108 6 Sugar maple broken crown 109 7 American e lm 11 0 7 S ugar maple 111 7 Sugar maple 112 8 Sugar maple 11 3 10 Ameri can e lm broken crown 114 7 Boxe ld er 11 5 12 Boxelder 11 6 8 Ameri can e lm dis eased -J No 11 7 8 A me ri can e lm d is eas ed /dead -J No 11 8 42 Bur oak 11 9 6 American e lm 120 8 Green ash 12 1 14 American e lm 122 9 Ame rican e lm di s eas ed -J No 123 12 Am e rican e lm 124 6 American e lm dis eased -J No 125 11 Green as h 126 16 American e lm di s eas ed -J No 127 7 American e lm di s eas ed -J No 128 12 American e lm dis eas ed/dead -J No 129 7 Boxelder 130 6 American e lm dead -J No 131 8 American e lm di seased -J No 132 6 American e lm dead -J No T ree ID Di ameter S pecies Cond ition/H ealth Proposed for Requi res (inc hes) Re mova l M iti gation 133 9 Am e ri can e lm dea d '1 No 134 10 A m erican elm dead '1 No 135 14 B asswood 136 30 S ugar ma pl e m a n y dead limbs 137 7 A meri can e lm 138 8 Suga r ma ple 139 17 G ree n ash 140 8 S ugar m a pl e 14 1 8 Sug ar ma pl e crown miss in g 142 I 1 S ugar mapl e 143 9 Boxeld er 144 8 A merican e lm 14 5 13 Ame ri can e lm 146 12 Am e r ic an e lm 147 9 Boxe ld er 14 8 11 S ugar ma ple 149 11 A merican e lm dead .J N o 150 26 S ugar maple co re ro t, no crown 15 1 28 S ugar ma p le core rot 152 12 American elm 153 15 Bl ack walnut 154 24 Sugar ma pl e core rot/n earl y dead '1 No 155 10 A meri can e lm dead .J No 156 2 1 S ugar m ap le many dead li mbs 157 7 S ugar map le 158 7 S ugar map le 159 8 A me ri can e lm d iseased '1 No 160 15 G reen ash 161 23 Sugar mapl e snag 162 8 Sugar maple 163 8 S ugar maple 164 29 S ugar ma pl e core rot/broken crown 165 7 S ugar map le 166 7 S ugar maple 167 9 S ugar ma pl e 168 12 S ugar ma pl e 169 6 S ugar map le b roken crown 170 9 S ugar ma pl e 17 1 7 Ameri can e lm d iseased '1 No 172 9 Sugar map le 173 8 Sugar ma pl e 174 10 S ugar ma pl e broken crown 175 9 S ugar mapl e 176 17 Hackberry Tree ID Di ameter Species Condition/Health Proposed for Requires (inches) Removal Mitigation 177 13 Boxelder 178 16 Boxeld er 179 16 S ugar maple 180 11 S ugar maple 181 8 Sugar maple 182 11 Sugar maple 183 7 S ugar maple 184 10 Sugar maple 18 5 8 Sugar maple 186 6 Sugar maple 18 7 7 Sugar maple 188 10 Sugar maple 189 10 S ugar maple 190 7 Sugar map le 191 6 S ugar mapl e 192 16 American e lm diseased/hollow y No 19 3 18 Sugar map le 194 8 Sugar maple 195 12 Sugar maple 196 6 S ugar maple b roken crown 197 9 S ugar maple 198 8 S ugar maple 199 7 S u g a r m ap le 200 8 Sug ar maple 201 6 Sugar maple d ead y No 202 9 Sugar maple 203 8 Sugar maple 204 7 Sugar maple 205 11 S ugar maple 206 10 American e lm 207 7 Sugar map le 208 21 Basswood s plit core 209 6 Basswood 210 8 Basswood 2 11 11 Bass wood 2 12 8 American elm 2 13 17 Bas swood 2 14 17 Bas swood 21 5 10 American e lm 2 16 8 S ugar maple 217 18 Red oak 2 18 7 Sugar maple 2 19 8 S ug ar maple core rot/leani ng y No 220 7 America n e lm Tree ID D iameter S pecies Conditi o n/He alth P ro posed for Requi res (in c h es) Removal Mit igatio n 22 1 10 Boxelder 222 16 Boxelde r two trun ks 223 7 S ugar ma pl e 224 11 S ugar ma ple 225 9 S ugar ma ple 226 6 S ug ar m a ple 22 7 10 S ugar m ap le 22 8 16 Green ash 229 14 S ugar m aple d ead /leaning ,J No 23 0 6 S ugar m aple 23 1 6 Sugar m apl e 232 1 Green a sh 2'"'"' .) .) 8 Boxeld er leaning 234 14 Boxeld e r 235 7 Boxeld er 236 15 Hac k berry 237 13 Basswood 238 6 S ugar maple 239 25 S ugar ma pl e 240 12 Boxelder 24 1 10 S ugar maple 242 7 S ugar map le 243 8 Sugar map le 24 4 8 Sugar ma pl e 245 26 Sugar map le 246 22 S ugar ma pl e 247 7 S ug ar ma pl e 248 7 Ame ri can e lm 249 11 Boxe lde r 250 8 S ugar map le 25 1 6 S u gar map le 252 20 G ree n ash 253 7 S ugar maple 254 7 S u gar m aple 255 8 Sug a r maple 256 8 Sugar m aple 257 9 Sugar maple crown m issing 258 6 Hi ckory li ke ly b itte rnut 259 2 1 Sugar maple 260 2 1 Sugar maple 26 1 8 S ugar ma ple 262 28 S ugar maple 263 27 S ugar maple 264 25 S ugar maple s p ike Tree ID Diameter S pec ie s Conditi o n/He a lth Proposed for Requires (inches) Removal Mitigation 265 19 S ugar maple 266 24 Unknown possibly walnut, sp ik e 267 26 Sugar mapl e 268 15 Sugar mapl e core rot 269 12 Sugar maple 270 12 Sugar mapl e 27 1 14 Basswood 272 11 Basswood 273 8 Sugar maple 274 8 S ugar maple 275 19 Basswood 276 6 Sugar maple 277 7 Sugar maple 278 11 Sugar maple 279 25 Sugar maple extreme leaning "' No 280 7 Sugar maple 281 36 Sugar map le s nag, very nice 282 7 Sugar maple 283 7 Basswood 284 17 S ugar mapl e many ho ll ow areas 285 22 S ugar mapl e bottom rot, overall co ndition ok 286 26 S ugar maple s pike 287 16 S ugar mapl e s nag 28 8 15 Basswood 289 14 Basswood 290 9 Basswood 29 1 16 Basswood 292 11 Basswood 293 10 Basswood 294 7 Basswood 295 9 Basswood 296 10 Basswood 297 11 Basswood 298 17 Basswood 299 IO Basswood 300 12 Basswood 301 16 Basswood 302 7 Basswood 303 13 Gree n ash 304 14 Unknow n d ead (only supported by tree 303) "' No 305 11 Sugar maple 306 8 Sugar map le 307 25 Sugar mapl e leaning, dying, co re rot "' No 308 18 S ugar maple leaning , core rot, man y dead branche< "' No Tree ID Di a me t e r S pec ie s Condition/Health Proposed fo r Req uires (inc he s) Remo va l Mitigati on 309 15 S ugar mapl e 3 10 23 S ugar m a pl e le a ning, dis eased, bad pa rt s '1 No 3 11 11 Am eric an e lm 3 12 6 S ugar ma ple 31 3 2 1 S ug ar ma ple 3 14 10 G reen as h 3 15 11 Ameri can e lm 316 11 Basswood 317 11 Sugar m a ple 3 18 16 S ugar m a pl e do ub le trunks o f eq ua l di a meter 319 19 Basswo o d 320 8 Basswo o d leaning but safe 32 1 9 S ugar mapl e bottom ro t , overall co nd it io n ok 322 15 Boxelder bi g bro ken li mb 323 22 Basswood 324 18 B asswo od 32 5 11 S ugar m apl e 326 27 Su gar mapl e 327 28 S ugar m apl e s nag 328 6 S ugar mapl e 329 13 S ugar map le 330 14 S ugar map le 33 1 13 S ugar map le 332 8 Sugar mapl e b roken crown ..,,.,,., 14 S ugar maple botto m go ing bad .) .) .) 334 16 Boxelde r 335 12 Boxelder 336 13 Ame ri can e lm 33 7 28 S ugar ma ple bad shape, ho ll ow '1 No 338 13 G ree n ash 339 14 G ree n as h 340 6 Sugar map le 34 1 14 Boxe ld e r 342 7 Sugar m ap le defo r med 343 18 Boxe ld e r leani ng, sp li t trun k 344 12 Boxe ld e r 345 13 A merican e lm 346 8 Boxeld e r 347 12 A me ri can e lm 348 11 American e lm 349 6 S ugar m apl e bad bottom 350 14 S ugar mapl e 35 1 11 S ugar m apl e 352 15 S ugar ma pl e Tree ID Diameter Species Condition/Health Proposed for Requires (inches) Removal Mitigation 353 6 Sugar maple 354 7 Sugar maple broken crown 355 8 Sugar maple broken crown 356 20 Sugar maple bad s hape, dying ,/ No 357 10 Crabapple 358 8 Boxelder 359 10 Green ash 360 8 Crabapple 361 10 American elm 362 12 American elm dead ,/ No 363 14 American elm dead ,/ No 364 14 American elm dead ,/ No 365 48 Sugar maple crown mi ss ing 366 12 Green ash 367 13 Green as h 368 10 American e lm 369 7 American e lm 370 60 Cottonwood see notes B lack W ill ow multiple trunks 12 to 30 in, broken 3 7 1 main lim bs see notes B lack Willow m ul tiple trunks 12 to 30 in , broken 372 main lim bs 373 6 Boxelder 374 13 Green ash 375 34 Green ash multiple trunks, split crown APPENDIXD Bayside Meadows, Orono, MN MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT QUALITY OF WATER QUALITY OF LIFE Memo To: Melissa Barrett , Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company From: Catherine Bach, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District CC: Bob Molstad , Sathre-Berquist, Inc . Bill Coffman Date: January 17, 2013 Re: Wetland Functional Assessment (MnRAM) for PIO #0611723220018 (Wachman Parcel) An application for approval of wetland boundary & type under the Minneso ta Wetland Conservation Act was submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (District) on October 22, 2012 for the Wa chman parcel (PID #0611723220018), which is located just so uth of 4665 & 4645 Bayside Road in the city of Orono. One wetland was determined to be on the property and is shown on the attached survey . A wetland functional assess ment using the current version of the Minnesota Routine Asse ss ment M ethod (MnRAM 3 .4) was submitted on January 3, 2013 for approval. The functional assessment is contained in the attached memo. In the District's Function al Assessment of Wetlands inventory, the wetland is currently classified as Preserve. The wetland was classified as Manage 2 as a result of the functiona l assessment, and the District concurs with this classification. This memo serves as formal approval of the manage m e nt classification of the wetland as M anage 2 for MCWD permitting requirements . Enclosed: Memo containing functional assessment Survey showing wetland boundary lqOUIAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY Providing Sound, Balanctd, Compr<htn1ivt Natural Rtsource Solution, Memorandum Date: January 3, 2012 To: Catherine Bach, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Cc: Bob Molstad, Sathre-Berquist, Inc. From: Melissa Barrett, Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company Re: MNRAM Analysis -Wetland I , Wachman Parcel, Orono, MN According to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District wetland inventory, Wetland I of the Wachman Parcel is rated as a Prese rve wetland. Wetland present on th e Wachman Parcel is part of a larger PEMAd/PEMCd wetland complex that continues to the southeast and eventually connects (approximately 0.25 miles distance) to the North Arm of Lake Minnetonka shore land system. Previous ly, wetland analyses performed for wetlands abutting s horeland have rated as Preserve due to the s ho reline protection function. However, wetland present on the Wachman parcel does not provide shoreline protection. Wetland I was previously described as a Type 4 (PUBGx/PEMA) excavated, open water and fresh (wet) meadow wetland complex (Wachman Parcel Wetland Delineation Report dated October 22, 2012). At the time of the delineati o n, the PUBGx portion of the wetland was un- vegetated and dry. The center of the basin was an upland knoll dominated by a canopy of boxelder. For the purposes of the delineation it was included within the wetland boundary. Fresh (wet) meadow was dominated by reed ca nary grass with le sser amounts of giant goldenrod and Canada thistle. Other non-dominant vegetation observed included : garlic mu stard, asters, blu e vervain, se d ge, black willow, boxelder, and American elm. In addition to the excavated basin, an excavated ditch connected the bas in to the east property lin e. MNRAM Analysis A MNRAM vers ion 3.4 functional analy sis was completed for Wetland I on the Wachman Parcel to assess appropriate wetland functions and management class based on current, on-site observations. A M NRA M output summary and input data are included in Appendix A , and results are s ummarized in Table 1 below. 26105 Wild Rose Lan e, Shorewood , Minnesota 55331 , Ph one : 952-40 1-8757, Fax : 952-40 1-8798 T bl 1 MNRAM 3 4 A I . R It f W ti d 1 W h a e . na1ys1s esu s or e an ac man P reel. a Function Rating Veg Diversity/Integrity Low Hydrology -Characteristic Moderate Flood Attenuation Moderate Water Quality-Downstream Moderate Water Quality -Wetland Moderate Shoreline Protection N IA Wildlife Habitat Structure Moderate Fish Habitat N IA Amphibian Habitat N IA Aesthetics/Recreational/ .... Low St01mwater Sensitivity Moderate Conclusion Based on current, site specific conditions the management classification for Wetland I of the Wachman Parcel is Manage 2 based on the highest rated function of Moderate for Wildlife Habitat. We are seeking concurrence with this management class determination from Minnehaha Creek Watershed Di strict at thi s time. Thank you. APPENDIX A MNARAM Analysis-Wetland 1, Wachman Parcel, Orono, MN We tland Fu11ctio11al Assess111e11t Su11unary lf'etlt11ul N"m e Wachman Orono WL 1 H.1·tl1"oge o11101plt ology Depressional/Flow-through (apparent inlet and outlet). Depressional/Flow-through (apparent inlet and outlet} M11i11te11a11ce of M aillte11a11ce of A estlteticsl Cltaracreristic Mai11tem111ce of Cltamc·tel'istic Recreatio11/ Wildlife Habitat Cl111rncteristic A mphibian Ed11catio11/ Ill II ill t e mm c e of Hy tlro /ogic R eg i111e 0.52 Mode rate Flood/ Stonm vaterl Atte111111tio11 0.38 Moderate Gro11 11tl- Water 1'111i11tem111ce D0w11s tl'ei1111 ofWet/1111d Water Quality 0.57 Moderate Water Sltoreli11e Quality Protection 0.54 0.00 Moderate Not A pplicable Additional 111/ ormatio11 Wetland Se11siti1 ,ity A dditio1111f Stormwater Trer1tme11t to Stormw11ter IVetltmd N am e Structure Fis h Habitat Habitat C11l111ral Commerchll Uses lnreractio 11 Wetfa 11d Restomrio11 Potem ial 11111{ Urb an De1·elop 111e11t N uds Wachman Orono WL 1 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 Combination 0.00 0.10 0.54 Discharge , Recharge Moderate Not Applicable Not Appl icable Low Not Appl icabl e Not Applicable Moderate Moderate Wetland Community Su11unary Vegetative Diversi~y!Jntegrity Community We ighted Individual High est Al'erage Average CowaNlin Circular Plant Wetland Communi~v Wetland Wetland Wetla nd Wetland Name Location C/assificatio11 39 Communi~I' Proportion Rar;,,g Rating Rating Rating W achman Orono W L 1 27-117-23-06-001 PEM1A Type 1 Fre sh (Wet) Mead ow 70 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.10 Low Low Low PUBG Type 4 Shallow, Open Water 30 0.1 0.10 0 .1 0 0.10 1Communities I I 100 I \ 0 .10 \ ~~: \ ~~1: Jo Low 0 Denotes incomplete calculatio11 data. Thursday, January 03, 2013 Page 1 of 1 MnRAM: Site Response Record For Wetland: Wachman Orono WL 1 Location: 27-117-23-06-001 Wach man Site Orono Plant Community: Fresh (Wet) Meadow Cowardin Classification: Circular 39: PEM1A Type 1 Plant Community: Shallow, Open Water C Cowardin C lassification: Circular 39: PUBG Type 4 4 Listed. rare, special species? ~ 5 Rare co111111unity or habitat' E] 6 Pre-European-settlemenl condition ? E] Hy drogeomorphology I topography: 7 Depressional/FlowThru 8-/ Maximum water dept/, 8-2 % inundated 9 Immediate drainage--local WS IO Esimated s i=elexist111g site: I I-Upland Soil I /-Wetland Sn i/ 12 Outlet for flood control /3 O utlet for hy dro regime I -I Dominant upland land 11se 15 Wetland soil condition /6 Vegetmion (% cove1) 17 Emerg. veg floo d resistance 18 S ediment delive1y /9 Upland soils (soil g ro up) 20 Stormwater runoff 21 S ubwaters hed wetland density 22 C hanne ls/s heet flo w ? ' -J Adjacent b 1iffer width Adjacent area management 2-1 -A F ull 24-B Manicured 24-C Bare Oinches 0% 20 acres (se e #66) ~ ~ 0 [!] I 70% I ~ I-A-I [!] 0 0 ~ 50 feet I 1100%1 I o% I pi0kJ Adjacent area diversi(vlstructure 2 5-A Native I 0% I 25-B Mixed 1100%1 25-C Sparse I 0% j Adjacent area slope 26-A Gentle 26-B Moderate 26-C Steep 27 Downstream sens.lWQ protect. ~ 28 Nutrient loading ~ 29 Shoreline wetland? ~ Shoreline Wetland 3 () Rooted veg., % cover 1°% I 31 Wetland in-water width I O feet 32 Emerg. veg. erosio n resistance D 33 Erosion potential of site D 34 Upslope veg.I bank protection D 35 Rare wildlife ? ~ 36 Scare!Rare/S1/S2 community [ No j 3 7 Vegetative co ver tE 38 Veg. community interspersion 39 Wetland d ell'iltls ~ 40 interspe rsion 011 landscape 0 41 Wildlife barriers 0 Amphibian-breeding potential ./2 Hydro pe r,od adequacy I Inadequate 43 Fish presen ce 0 44 Ovenvintering habitat ~ 45 Wildlife sp ecies (list) 46 Fis h habitat quality I NA I 47 Fish species (list) 48 Unique/r are o ppo rtunity E] 49 Wetland vis ibility ~ 50 Proximity to populatio n ~ 5 / Public ownership ~ 52 Public a cces s ~ 53 Human influe nce on wetland I s-1 54 Human influe nce on viewshed ~ 55 Spatial buffe r 0 56 R ecreational ac rivity potential ~ 57 Commercial crop--hydro impact Groundwater-specific questions 58 Wetland soils Recharge 59 Subwatershed land use Recharge 60 Wetland si~e/soil gro up Discharge 61 Wetland hydroperiod Recharge 62 lnle1/011tlet con.figuration Discharge 63 Upland topo relief Discharge Additional information 64 Resroration potential No 65 LO affected by restoration 66 Existing si=e ~ Restorable si=e Potential new wetland 67 Average width of pot. buffer O feet 68 Ease of potential restoration 69 Hydrolog ic alterations 70 Potential wetland type 71 Stormwater s e ns itivity 72 Additional treatment needs Watershed WS# S ervi ce Area : 0 0 B A For functional ratings, please run the Summary tab report . This r eport printed on : 113/2013 Management Classification Report for Wachman Orono Wll ID: 29 Wachman Site Orono HENNEPIN County Watershed, # Corps Bank Service Area Based on the Mn RAM data input from field and office review and using the classification se ttings as shown below, this wetland is classified as Manage 2 Functional rank of this wetland based on MnRAM data Functional Category Self-defined classification value settings for this management level Low I Moderate Not Applicab le Not App licab le Not Applicable Low Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Not Applicab le Mode r ate Vegetative Diversity/Integrity Habitat Structure (wildlife) Amphibian Habitat Fish Habitat Shoreline Protection Aesthetic/Cultural/Rec/Ed and Habitat Stormwater/Urban Sensitivity and Vegetative Diversity Wetland Water Quality and Vegetative Diversity Characteristic Hydrology and Vegetative Diversity Flood/Stormwater Attenuation* Commericial use* Downstream Water Qua lity* The critica l functi o n that caused this wetl and to rank as Manage 2 was Maintenance of Characteristic Wildlife Habitat Structure Detail s of the formula for thi s action are shown below: Moderate Moderate Low Moderate Low Moderate/ Low -/ - -/ - -/ - Maintenance of Characteristic Wildlife Habitat Str (Q3e*2+Q39+Q37+Q38+Q40+Q41+(Q23+Q24+Q2 5)/3+Q 13+Q20)/10 Question Value Description 13 0.1 Outlet: hydrologic regime 20 0.5 Stormwater runoff 23 0.5 Buffer width 24 1 Adjacent area Management 25 0 .5 Adjacent area diversity 37 0.1 Vegetation cover interspersion 38 0.1 Community interspersion 39 0 .5 Detritus * The cl ass ification val ue settings for these functions are not adjustable Management Classification Report for Wach man Orono Wll ID: 29 3e 40 41 0 .1 1 1 <No Description Found> Wetland interspersion/landscape Wildlife barriers This report was printed on: Thursday, January 03, 2013 • The clas sification va lue settings for these function s are not adjustable Wachman Site Orono HENNEPIN County Watershed, # Corps Bank Service Area NORTH DESIGN DATA: ZONING: RR-1B MIN LOT AREA: 2 .0 AC MIN LOT WIDTH: 200 FT FYSB-SOFT SYSB-30 FT SYSB STRT • 50 FT RYSB -50 FT •• MAX COS LENGTH-1000 FT '" MIN CURVE 275 FT PREPARED FOR: GONYEA HOMES CONTAC T: TYLER WENKUS 763-432-4502 EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN A N APPROXIMATE WAY ON LY . THE CONTRACTOR SHAL L DETERMINE TH E EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND All EX1ST1N G UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENC ING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPON SIBLE FOR ANY ANO ALL D AMAGES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE ANO PRESERVE ANY AND ALL E XI STING lJTILITIES. 100 50 0 50 100 SCALE I N FEET 200 I H EREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATIO N WAS PREPARED BY ME OR U NDER MY DI RECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTER ED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE S TA TE OF MI NNESOTA. ------------DATE _______ R EG. NO ----- , RE VI SIONS BY "' \. ., 8 0 0 ~ z "' ,-. ... N "' I-e Cf) m M "' :::> "' z a ::;; <i C) I- er ;5 >-<{ w :a: en >-<{ I :a: w 0 <{ er 0 Q'. I al J: I-I-:, <( 0 C/) Cf) 0 ';! 01<S S1,~ <v' 1',i, " g .. -' "' .. </) "' «-: ~ 1', 0"'" D1y3 o~'='' 0.. __J <( w <( 2 u I-z 0 (f) 0::: LU 0 <( (f) 2 f'.= LU <( CL z 0 (.) z ;?; I 0 <( 2 <( _J LU 0 2 6 >- z I z z <( u 0 0 _J 0::: (.'.) I-<( 0 UJ s s ., DRAW N 'I RSM CHECKED XXX DATE 10.15-12 SCALE AS S HOWN JOB NO. 31202-070 ILE: BASE_WACH.OWG Sl"lEET Wet \. OF SHEETS--' APPENDIXE Bayside Meadows, Orono, MN .KjOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY Prouiding Sound, Balanc.d, Compreh,nsiu, Natural Rrsourct Solutions COMMON/GLOSSY BUCKTHORN CONTROL PLAN Phase I -Initial Eradication (September and October) 1. Identify all buckthorn with trunk diameter greater than 1.5" measured at ground level within the control areas. Chemically treat with glyphosate, Garlon or Rodeo using cut stump method or girdling. Mark cut stumps with colored wire flag. 2. Identify buckthorn saplings less than or equal to three (3) feet tall within the control areas. Treat saplings with foliar chemical treatment glyphosate, Garlon or Rodeo. Phase 2 -Extended Maintenance I. Identify all new growth buckthom with trunk diameter greater than I .5" measured at ground level within the control areas. Chemically treat with glyphosate , Garlon or Rodeo using cut stump method or girdling. 2. Identify flagged stumps from Phase I and apply glyphosate to stumps that have re- s prouted. Treat stump shoots with glyphosate , Garlon or Rodeo. 3. Identify new buckthorn samplings less than or equal to three (3) feet tall within the control area. Treat saplings with glyphosate, Garlon or Rodeo. 4. Continue phase 2 methods for the life of the project which ends two years after the completion of construction. COMMON/GLOSSY BUCKTHORN CONTROL METHODS 1. The following methods are approved methods of removal and control. Any deviation from these methods needs to be approved by the owner's representative prior to their use. Method 1 -Foliar Chemical Treatment I. Foliar che mical treatment shall be used on buckthorn saplings le ss than or equal to three (3) feet tall. 2. Chemical s pray shall be applied between the months of mid-September through October. Chemical s pray shall not be used between March 15 and July I. 3. Spray to wet all foliage of saplings. 4. Use handheld or backpack sprayers with ultra-low volume nozzles to minimiz e contact with desirable existing plants . 5. Apply broad leaf chemical herbicide g lyphosate, Garlon or Rodeo. 26105 Wild Rose Lane, Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 , Phone: 952-401-8757 , Fa x: 952-401-8798 Method 2 -Cut Stump Treatment l. Cut stump treatment shall be used on buckthorn with trunks greater than l .5" measured at ground level. 2. Cut buckthorn as close as possible to ground level and mark with colored wire flag for future identification and treatment. 3. Apply glyphosate, Garton or Rodeo chemical herbicide to cut stump surface, bark exposed above ground, and roots exposed above ground using paint brush, wick applicator or low-volume sprayer. Glyphosate, Garton or Rodeo chemical herbicide to be minimum strength of I 0.0%. Method 3 -Girdling (Frill Cut) Treatment I. Girdling treatment may be used on buckthorn with trunks greater than 3" measured at ground level. 2. Cut a frill around entire circumference of trunk as close as possible to ground level. 3. Apply glyphosate, Garlon, or Rodeo chemical treatment to entire frill cut and adjacent bark surface using paint brush , wick applicator or low-volume sprayer. Glyphosate , Gari on or Rodeo chemical herbicide to be minimum strength of 10.0%. HERBICIDE NOTES Garton and Ortho Brush-B-Gon Active ingredient is Tryclopyramine. Mix with water for cut s tump, frill, and foliar applications. Apply immediately afte r cut stump and frill. Glyphosate Glyphosate is the active ingredient in Roundup . Mix with water for cut stump, frill, and foliar applications. IO to 20% active ingredient is required for cut s tump and frill method s. 3% active ingredient is required for foliar application. Apply within 24 hours of the cut stump a nd frill. Water based chemical. Rodeo is a g lyphosate product for aquatic use. Use on plants within wetlands a nd within 10-ft of wetland edges. Use the sa me rate as outlined above for glyphosate. COMMOM/GLOSSY BUC KTHORN CONTROL PLAN-Page 2 of2 Kjolhaug Environmental Service s Wachman Parcel Orono, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report Prepared for Bill Coffman by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (KES Project No. 20 l 2-068) October 22, 2012 PC ExhibitO RECEIVED JAN 2 3 2013 CIT'f OF ORONO ....:::... --· WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY • The Watchman parcel was inspected on October 12, 2012 for the presence and extent of wetland. • The NWI-map showed one PUBGx/PEMA wetland within site boundaries. • The soil survey shows that all soils present within site boundaries are partially hydric. • The DNR Protected Waters Map did not show any DNR Protected Waters, Waterways, or Wetlands within or near site boundaries. • One Type 4 (PUBGx/PEMA) excavated, open water and fresh (wet) meadow wetland complex was delineated within site boundaries. Wachman Parcel Orono, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report I. INTRODUCTION The Wachman Parcel was examined on October 12, 2012 for the presence and extent of wetland. The 13 .72-acre site was located in Section 6, Township 117N, Range 23W, City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, approximately 400 feet south of Bayside Road, and south of the addresses of 4665 and 4645 Bayside Road (Figure 1). The western half of the site consisted of a hayfield . The eastern half of the site was moderately sloping deciduous woodland in the south, and sloping meadow and flat wetland in the north (Figure 2). Topography for the site generally sloped downhill to the east central portion of the site (i.e. slopes downhill in all directions towards the wetland). II.METHODS Wetlands were identified using Routine Determination methodology described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Waterways Experiment Station, 1987) and Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Wetland boundaries were identified as the upper-most extent of wetlands, which met criteria for hydric so ils, hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrology. Wetland-upland boundaries were marked with pink pin flags and located by Sathre-Berquist. Soils, vegetation , and hydrology were documented at representative locations along the wetland- upland boundary. Plant species dominance was estimated based on the percent aerial or basal coverage visually estimated within a 30-foot radius for trees and vines, 15-foot radius for the shrub layer, and a 5-foot radius for the herbaceous layer within the community type being sampled. Soils were characterized to a minimum depth of 18-20 inches (unless otherwise noted) utilizing Munsell Soil Color Charts and standard so il texturing methodology. Hydric soil indicators used in reporting are from the NTCHS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (USDA Natural Reso urces Conservation Service Version 7, 2010) which are commonly found in the Midwest. Plants were identified using standard regional plant keys. Taxonomy was based on the Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Aqjacent Canada, Ed. 2 (New York 2 Botanical Garden, 1991 ). Indicator status of plant species was taken from the 2012 National Wetland Plant List (Lichvar, R.W. and Kartesz, J.T. 2009. North American Digital Flora: National Wetland Plant List, version 2.4.0 (https://wetland_plants.usace .army.mil). U.S. Arm y Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH, and BONAP, Chapel Hill , NC.) III.RESULTS Review of Soils, NWI, and DNR Information The National Wetland Inventory Map (NW/) (Mound Quadrangle, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 1989) showed one PUBG:x/PEMA wetland within the site boundaries (Figure 3). The Soil Survey of Hennepin County, Minnesota (http://soils.usda.gov/survey/geography/ssurgo/) showed the following soil types within or near site boundaries (Figure 4). Partially hydric means that at least one component of the map unit is rated as hydric . SMU Map Unit Name Hvdric? L22E Lester loam, morainic, 18 to 25 percent slopes Partially hvdric L23A Cordova loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Partially hydric L36A Hamel, overwash-Hamel complex, 1 to 4 percent slopes Partially hydric L40B Angus-Kilkenny complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes Partially hydric L41C2 Lester-Kilkenny complex, 6 to I 2 pe rcent slopes, eroded Partially hydric L41E Lester-Kilkenny complex, 18 to 25 percent slopes Partially hydric The DNR Protected Waters Map, Hennepin County (http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/) did not show any DNR Protected Waters, Waterways, or Wetlands within or near site boundaries (Figure 5). Wetland Determinations and Delineations Potential wetlands were evaluated in greater detail during field observations on October 1, 2012. One wetland was identified and delineated on the subject s ite (Figure 2). Corresponding data forms are included in Appendix A. The following description of the wetland and adjacent upland reflects conditions observed at the time of the field visit. At that time, herbaceous vegetation was actively growing and temperatures were typical of the season. Wetland hydrology was assumed to be drier than typica l for that date based on below normal precipitatio n amounts in for the preceding 30 days (Appendix B). The survey of the wetland boundary is presented in Appendix C. Wetland 1 was a Type 4 (PUBG:x/PEMA) excavated, open water and fresh (wet) meadow wetland complex. The PUBGx portion of the wetland was un-vegetated and dry. The center of the basin was an upland knoll dominated by a canopy of boxelder. For the purposes of this delineation it was included within the wetland boundary. Fresh (wet) meadow was dominated by reed canary grass with lesse r amounts of giant goldenrod and Canada thistle. Other non- 3 dominant vegetation observed included : garlic mustard, asters, blue vervain, sedge, black willow, boxelder, and American elm. Soils observed below the wetland boundary were black silty clay loam to 44 inches underlain by depleted silty clay loam, meeting the f 12 indicator for hydric soil (thick dark surface). No free water or saturated soil was observed within 46 inches the soil surface in the sample borehole. Secondary indicators of wetland hydrology included geomorphic position and the PAC-Neutral Test. Adjacent upland at the sample location was dominated by a canopy of green ash and sugar maple, and an understory of common burdock, motherwort, garlic mustard, aster, and reed canary grass. Upland soils also met the A 12 indicator for hydric soil. No primary or secondary indicators of wetland hydrology were observed. The delineated boundary followed a slight change in vegetation compos ition (an increase in Canada thistle, Canada goldenrod, and common milkweed) and a gradual change in topography. Wetland 1 corresponded to an NWI-mapped wetland and was located within an area mapped with Hamel (poorly drained, and somewhat poorly drained) soil on the soil survey. The wetland extended off the s ite to the east. Other Areas No other areas with wetland vegetation or hydrology were observed on the site. No other areas were shown as wetland on the NWI map. 4 V. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION The procedures utilized in the described delineation are based on the COE 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Both the delineation and report were conducted in compliance with regulatory standards in place at the time the work was completed. All site boundaries indicated on figures within this report are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Delineation Completed by: Melissa Lauterbach-Barrett, Soil Scientist Certified Wetland Delineator No. 1085 Professional Soil Scientist No. 45067 Xg/ Report reviewed by: ______________ _ Date: October 22, 2012 Mark Kjolh aug, Professional Wetland Scientist No. 000845 5 Wachman Parcel Wetland Delineation Report Figures: • Figure 1 -Site Location Map • Figure 2 -Aerial Photograph • Figure 3-NWI Map • Figure 4 -Soil Survey Map • Figure 5 -DNR Protected Waters Map Note: Site boundaries on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ~rl F d-1 Lake : 29 ] . W,1krto wn P.::J 4-0 ~e,-1;, <J I., ~ Site Location~ ..::======B-Jyscr Ref~ ~l Arm Dr 3: ci ~ 0 .c V, z . ·-1 , 19 J For€·£t · ~, Saga Hill laf..e Jennings Bay ·/\J S1, lo ~c>-o, West A rm ~1 OU nd Seton Spring Park ,,,.£;u lake oa~'!t!n z 'tayzata Bfvd 'vV Q r O t_) 0 "'' L6hg l a ---··· .. -·---_·,-----~~ i 146 ] •.•./a t~, t~h·.-n Rd "' ,::. Stubbs Bay a: ~ 0 :iS -' Fu:<S1 1, "{ V'\ ~ Maxwell ,::. .. Fre.ncll ~ North 1J. Boy l.a ke i Arm ~ <.,hor~or ~o @_~ qj <-,\-I, Crystal Say f 1~j Sn C 1y5 tul ! 51-1 . ··:.' Bay .,\ · Mi n,1etonk ~1_ B.each ,..,. -:-;::,_ .':-::/ ' •ii:, . '1 .. Shoreltne Dr <;>lo: Lo(ayetre Buy :ti~" ® 20'12 Mic rosoft Corpor:.tior. © 2·:)12 Nokra . Figure 1 -Site Location Map Wachman Parcel (KES No. 2012-068) Orono, Minnesota K/OLHAUG EN VIRONMENTAL SE RVICES C O MPANY ,t-N No Scale Note: Site boundaries on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Figure 2 -2012 Aerial Photograph Wachman Parcel (KES No. 2012-068) ~ KjOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY ------- Orono, Minnesota 1 inch -241 feet '~ ....... ., ___ ) ' I l ) ,/ ( Figure 3 -NWI Map (USGS Mound Quadrangle) Wachman Parcel (KES No. 2012-068) ~ KjOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY .....___,. Orono, Minnesota 1 inch -650 feet Note: Site boundaries on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Soil Legend L22E -Lester loam, morainic , 18 to 25 percent slopes L23A -Cordova loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes L36A -Hamel, overwash-Hamel complex , I to 4 percent slopes L40B -Angus-Kilkenny complex , 2 to 6 percent slopes L41C2 -Lester-Kilkenny complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded L41E -Lester-Kilkenny complex, 18 to 25 percent slopes Figure 4 -Soil Survey Map Wachman Parcel (KES No. 2012-068) Orono, Minnesota KjOLIIAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY 1 inch -265 feet Note: Site boundaries on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Figure 5-DNR Protected Waters Map --------- Wachman Parcel (KES No. 2012-068) Orono, Minnesota Kf OLIIAUG ENVI RO NME NTAL SE RVICES COMPANY 1 inch -520 feet Wachman Parcel Wetland Delineation Report Appendix A: Data Forms WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region ProjecUSite W achman Parcel City/County: ___ O_r_o_n_oi_H_e_n_n ___ Sampling Date: ___ 1_0_1_121_1 _2 __ _ ApplicanUOwner: B . Coffman State: MN Sampling Point: S P1 -upl ------------------1 n vest i gator ( s ): M . Barrett 3ection. Township, Range: ______ 6...;,_1_1_7.:...' _2_3 ____ _ Landform (h i lls/ope. ter race. etc.): abo ve toeslope d epression Local relief (concave, convex , none): low fl at slope _______ ..:.._ __ _ Sl ope(%): 1-4 Lat:------------Long : Datum:----------- Soil Map Un it Name_H_a_m_e_l _____________________ 'lW I Cl assifica lion: _____ P_U_B_G_x_lP_E_~_I_A ___ _ A re climatic/hydrol ogic conditions of the site typical fo r this time of the year? N (Ii no, explain in rema rl<s) Are vegetation . so il , or hydrology s ignifi cantly distu rbec? Are "normal c ircumstances" A re v egetalion . soil , or hydrology naturally problemati c? present ? Yes SUMMARY OF FIND INGS (Ii needed , explain any answers in remarks .) Hydrophytic vegetation present? N --Hyd ric soil prese nt? y Is the sampled area within a wetland? N -- Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes , o ptional wetl and s ite I D: Rema rks: (Explain alternative procedures here or i n a s;;parate report.) 3 0-day roll i ng prec ipitation a verag e below n o rmal VEGETATION --U s e s cientific names o f p l ant&. .t\bsolute Dominan Indic ator Dominance Test Worksheet Tr ee Stratu m (Pl o t size: 30 ) % Co ver t Species Staus Number of Dom i nant Species 1 Fraxinus penn sy l va nica 20 y FACW that are OBL, FA CW , or FAC: 3 (A) 2 A cer saccharum 20 y FA CU To tal Number of Do minant Cf 3 Species Across all Slrata : (BJ 4 Perce nt of Dominant Species 75"' 5 tha t are OBL. FACW . or FAC : (A/B) 40 = To lal Cover Sagling/Shrub straturr (Plot siz e: 15 ) P rev al ence Index Work sheet 1 Tot al % Cover of: 2 OB L species -x 1 = ----fo6 3 FACW species ~ x 2 = 4 FAC spe cies 15 x 3 = !I:.£_ 5 FACU spe cies JO x 4 = l:kJL 0 = To tal Cover UPL spec ies S x5 = ~ Herb stratum (Plot si z e: 5 ) Co lurnn lota ls 'go (A) ~(B) 1 Alliaria petiolat a 15 y FAC Prevalence Index= B/A = 3./ZS 2 Phalaris arundinacea 10 y FACW 3 Cirsium arvense 5 N FACU Hydrophytic V ege tation Indicator s: 4 Ascl epias syriaca 5 N FACU Rapi d tes t fo r hydrop hytic vegetation 5 -5 /_/ Ot}_VVI,/. ~ (A,-d.,,'t;t c..-,v Vf'L Dominance test is >50% 7---6 Prevalence index is s3.o • -7 Morphogical adaptalions ' (provide 8 s upporting data in Rem arks or o n a 9 separate sheet) -10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' tf--D ~ =To ta l Cover (e xplain) -Woody_ vine stratum (Pl ot s ize: 15 ) 'Indicators of hydric s o:I and wetla nd hydrology mus t be 1 pres ent. unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophyti c 0 = Total Cover v egetati on pre sent? N --- Remarks: (I nclude pllcto num be r s here or on a se parate s heet) fa,,<,;,,.,( I l..i. c..,.pL,:;hd_. Fr~<..y,/h,1.1) f'e h1'1>,f1fJ,.,,2 ,__ ah.l 1 "-vt,t--mvS f t:en,-, ~c}'r,, ~;P-Vl.f~O US Amy Corp s of En gin eer s Midwest Regio n SOIL Sampling Point: SP1-upl Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type* Loe** Texture Remarks 0-40 10YR 2/1 100 FS SCL 40-44 10YR 4/2 98 10YR 4/3 2 C M SCL *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion. RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL= Pore Lining , M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A 16) (LRR K, L, R) --Sandy Redox (S5) --Dark Surface (S?) (LRR K, L) Histic Epipedon (A2) -Black Histic (A3) -Stripped Matrix (S6) -,,on-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) -Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) -Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) --Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) -Stratified Layers (A5) -Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) --Other (explain in remarks) ---2 cm Muck (A10) -Depleted Matrix (F3) -Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) -Redox Dark Surface (F6) X Thick Dark Surface (A12) -Depleted Dark Surface (F?) -*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) -Redox Depressions (F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or -5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) problematic - Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? y Depth (inches): --- I Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Prima[Y Indicators (minimum of one is reguired; check all that a1212ll£l Secondarl£ Indicators (minimum of two reguired) ,._ Surface Water (A 1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) --Surface Soil Cra cks (B6) '---High Water Table (A2) --True Aquatic Plants (B14) Drainage Patterns (B10) --'---Sat uration (A3) -Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Tab le (C2) ,__ Water Marks (B1) -Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots --Crayfish Burrows (CB) '---Sed iment Deposits (B2) (C3) --Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) '---Drift Deposits (B3) -Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) --Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) ,__ Algal Mat o_r Crust (B4) -Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils --Geomorphic Position (D2) '---Iron Deposits (B5) (C6) x FAC-Neutral Test (05) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) -Thin Muck Surface (C7) -- ,._ Sparsely Vegetated Co ncave Surface (B8) -Gauge or Well Data (D9) .....__ -~ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes ---No X Depth (inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes ---No X Depth (inches): hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) --- Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: I Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region ProjecUSite Wachman Parcel City/County: ___ o_ro_n_o_lH_en_n ___ Sampling Date: ___ 1_0_11_2_11_2 __ _ Applicant/Owner: B. Coffman State: MN Sampling Point: SP1-wet -----------------1 n vest i gator ( s): M. Barrett Section, Township, Range: ______ 6..;.,_1_17..;•:....2_3 ____ _ Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): toeslope depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): slight flat slope ___ ___..:::..._ __ ...:...... __ _ Slope(%): 0-3 Lat:___________ Long: Datum: __________ _ Soil Map Unit Name Hamel 'IWI Classification : PUBGx/PEMA ----------------------------------Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? y --Hydric soil present? y Is the sampled area within a wetland? y --Indicators of wetland hydrology present? y f yes, optional wetland site ID : Wetland 1 Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) 30-day rolling precipitation average below normal VEGETATION --Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 that are 0BL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL , FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 0 =Total Cover Sa12ling/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 X 1 = 0 100 ---3 FACW species x2 = 200 4 FAC species 0 x3= 0 ------5 FACU species 5 x4 = 20 0 = Total Cover UPL species ---0 x5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size : 5 ) Column totals 105 (A) 220 (B) ------1 Phalaris arundinacea 100 y FACW Prevalence Index = BIA= 2.10 2 Cirsium arvense 5 N FACU 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation -5 X Dominance test is >50% -6 X Prevalence index is S3 .0* -7 Morphogical adaptations• (provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) -10 Problem atic hydrophytic vegetation• 105 =Total Cover (explain) -WoodY.. vine stratum (Plot size: 15 ) •indicators of hydric soil and w etland hydrology must be 1 present, unless disturbed or problematic 2 ~ya rophyt1c 0 = Total Cover vegetation present? y --- Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sh eet) US Amy Co rp s of En gin eers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP1-wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (In ches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type* Loe** Texture Remarks 0-44 10YR 2/2 100 SCL 44-46 10YR 4 /1 100 SCL *Ty pe : C = Concentration , D = Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL= Pore Lining , M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) ---Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) -Black Histic (A3) -Stripped Matrix (S6) --iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) -----Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 ) --Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Stratified Layers (A5) -Loamy Gleyed Matri x (F2) Other (explain in remarks) -2 cm Muck (A 10) -Depleted Matrix (F3) ----Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) -Redox Dark Surface (F6) X Thick Dark S urface (A12) --Depleted Dark Surface (F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) --Redox Depressions (F8) hydrology must be present, unles s disturbed or --5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) -problematic -- Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type : Hydric soil present? y Depth (in ches): --- I Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primart Indicators (minimum of one i s regu ired; c heck all that a1212ly) Secondaa Indicato rs (m in imum of two reguired) ......_ Surface Water (A 1) Aquatic Fauna (81 3) --Surface Soil Cracks (86) ~ High Wat er Table (A2) --Tru e Aqua ti c Plants (814 ) Drainage Patterns (810) 1--Saturati on (A3) --Hydrogen Su lfide Odor (C1) --Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B 1) --Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots --Crayfis h Burrows (C8) --Sed iment Deposits (82) (C3) --Satura ti on Visible on Aeria l Im agery (C9) 1--Drift Depo sits (8 3) --Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) --Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) 1-- Algal Mat or Cru st (84) --Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil s )( Geomorp hic Position (D2) 1--Iron Deposits (85) (C6) ><FAG-Neutral Test (D5) ......_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) --Thin Muck Surface (C7) ......_ Spa rse ly Vegetated Concave Surface (88) --Ga uge or Well Da ta (D9) ......_ . --Other (Expl ain in Remarks) ~ Wa ter-Stained Leaves (89) F ield Observations: Su rfa ce water present? Yes No X Dep th (inches): Water table present? Yes ---No )( Depth (inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes ---No X Depth (inches): hydrology present? y (in c lude s capillary fringe) --- Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: [Remarks : US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Wachman Parcel Wetland Delineation Report Appendix B: Precipitation Data Wachman Parcel, Orono: Precipitation Summary Source: Minnesota Climatology Working Group Month l y Totals: 2012 Target: T117 R23 56, Lat: 44 .97133 Lon : 93.63515 mon year cc tttN rrw ss nnnn 00000000 pre Jan 2012 217935 .49 Feb 2012 217935 1. 73 Mar 2012 217935 1. 70 Apr 2012 217935 2.96 May 2012 217935 9. 55 Jun 2012 27 118N 23w 22 SWCD 3.96 Jul 2012 217935 4.75 Aug 2012 27 117N 24w 27 BYRG 2.83 Sep 2012 27 117N 24W 27 BYRG .45 August/September/October Daily Records Date Precip. Date Preci p. Date Precip. Aug 1, 2012 0 Sep 1, 2012 0 Oct 1, 2012 0 Aug 2, 2012 .01 Sep 2, 2012 0 Oct 2, 2012 0 Aug 3, 2012 0 Sep 3, 2012 0 Oct 3, 2012 0 Aug 4, 2012 .49 Sep 4, 2012 0 Oct 4, 2012 0 Aug 5, 2012 0 Sep 5' 2012 .02 Oct 5, 2012 0 Aug 6, 2012 0 Sep 6, 2012 0 Oct 6, 2012 T Aug 7, 2012 0 Sep 7, 2012 T Oct 7, 2012 0 Aug 8, 2012 0 Sep 8, 2012 0 Oct 8, 2012 T Aug 9, 2012 0 Sep 9 , 2012 0 Oct 9, 2012 .02 Aug 10, 2012 0 Sep 10, 2012 0 Oct 10, 2012 0 Aug 11, 2012 0 Sep 11, 2012 0 Oct 11, 2012 0 Aug 12, 2012 T Sep 12, 2012 0 Oct 1 2, 2012 0 site visit Aug 13, 2012 .09 Sep 13, 2012 .11 Aug 14, 2012 0 Sep 14, 2012 0 Aug 15, 2012 .07 Sep 15, 2012 0 Aug 16, 2012 .14 Sep 16, 2012 0 Aug 17, 2012 0 Sep 17, 2012 .32 Aug 18, 2012 0 Sep 18, 2012 0 Aug 19, 2012 .31 Sep 19, 2012 0 Aug 20, 2012 0 Sep 20, 2012 0 Aug 21, 2012 0 Sep 21 , 2012 0 Aug 22, 2012 0 Sep 22, 2012 T Aug 23, 2012 .35 Sep 23, 2012 0 Aug 24, 2012 1. 37 Sep 24, 2012 0 Aug 25, 2012 0 Sep 25, 2012 0 Aug 26, 2012 0 Sep 26, 2012 0 Aug 27, 2012 0 Sep 27, 2012 0 Aug 28, 2012 0 Sep 28, 2012 0 Aug 29, 2012 0 Sep 29, 2012 0 Aug 30, 2012 0 Sep 30, 2012 0 Aug 31, 2012 0 ?~----------------------------------, -ti) 6 (1) .c (.) s::: ·--s::: 0 +:i flS ~ C. - Wachman Parce l, Orono g 4 I I \ I =-------.=---= \ " ::::::,.., -....1 ... C. flS -0 - normal precip range ~ 3 rlN====---===~~~~=--===~---_J .c -C 0 E "t, s::: flS ~ ·- 2 ns C 1 0 7/11/12 T 7/26/12 8/10/12 8 /25 /12 9/9/12 o monthly precip -daily precip -30d rolling total Site visit October 12, 2012 9/24/12 10/9/12 Wachman Parcel Wetland Delineation Report Appendix C: Wetland Boundary Survey Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Application for Approval of Wetland Type and Boundary 1. Project/Site Information Project/Site Name: Wachman Parcel Local Government Unit: MCWD Location (address and/or T, R. Sec.): T117N, R23W, Sec 6 Applicant Name: Bill Coffman 2. Applicant Information Address : 201 East Lake Street City, State, Zip: Wayzata, MN 55391-1695 E-mail: Phone: 3. Agent/Consu ltant Information Company Name (if applicable): Kjolhaug Environmental Contact Person: Melissa Barrett Address: 26105 Wild Rose Lane E-mail: melissa@kjolhaugenv.com City, State, Zip: Shorewood, MN 55331 Phone: 952-401-8757 4. Description of Request Check all that apply: X Wetland Boundary (must attach wetland delineation report) X Wetland Type (Eggers & Reed and/or Circular 39 type) 5. Signature By signature below, the applicant requests a determination from the Local Government Unit under Minnesota Rules 8420.0225 on the submitted wetland boundary and type information in this application. The applicant also affirms that they are the owner of the subject property or have permission from the land~ue~on /O/zZ/!Z- , Applicant or Authorized Agent Signature Date Important Notes: • The applicant may be required to submit multiple copies of the report/information to the LGU. The LGU may require the applicant to submit copies directly to Technica l Evaluation Panel Members. Check with your LGU regarding their submittal requirements. • The LGU decision must be made in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, section 15.99. For LGU use only Date Received: Page 1 of 1 BWSR Wetland Boundary/Type Application Form 11/10/08 !~ ~ l"S Arm~· Corps of Engineer'> St. Paul District Request for Corps of Engineers \Vetland Delineation Review Please enter the following general infomiation about the property under review : Name of property owner Ervin Wachman Property Address 0"0. & Street, City, State, Zip Code) 38 Address Unassigned, Orono, MN 00000 Lat. C Lon2. , ( decimal de2rees) Countv Hennepin Location: 1/4 Section 6 Towns hip 117 Range23 Size of review area 13.72 acre(s) Print Form By submission of this ,vetland delineation report I am requesting that the U.S. Anny Co1ps of Engineers. St. Paul District provide me with the following (check only one box): 0 Wetland Delineation Concunence. Concunence with awetland delineation is a wTit ten notification from the C01ps concuniug. not concurring. or commenting on the wetland b o undaries delineated on a prope1ty. Under this request. the C01ps will not address the jm-i sdictional status of the wetlands on the property . onl y the botmclaries of the resomces within the review area. D Prelinlinary Jurisdictional Determination. A prelinlina1y jurisdictional detennination is a non- binding written indication that there may be waters o f the United States. including wet lands. on a parcel or indicat ions of the approximate location(s) of waters of the United States or wetlands on a parcel. Preliminary jurisdictional detenn ina t ions are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. D Approved Jurisdictional Dete1mination. An approved jurisdictional dete1111.ination is an offic ia l Corps de termina tion th a t jurisdictional water s of the U nited States or n aviga ble waters of the United States . or both. are either p rese nt or absent on the property. An approved jurisdictional detenuination precisely identifies th e limits of those waters on the project site detemlined to be jmisdictional tmder the Clean Water Act or Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved jurisdictional detenninations can be relied upon by the affected party for a period of five years . An approved jurisdicti onal detemlination ma y be appealed through the Corps' administrative appeal process . In order for the Corps to process your request. the wetland delineation mus t be prepared in accordance with the 19 87 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. any approved Regional Supplements to the 198 7 Manual. and the Guidelines for Submitting We tl and Delineations .in l\,Ii.n.ne sota and Wisconsin (http://wi.vw .111vp.usace.a nuy.1nil/regulato1y '). Requestor_fi~_U/b_~~-~~~-~--------Date 10/22/12 Name (typed) _M_e_lis_s_a_B_a_r_re_u ______________ _ Minnesota Wetland Conse1Vation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit (LGU) Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Address 18202 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Project Name Date of Bill Coffman Wachman Parcel Application 10/22/12 (completed 12/5/12) ~ Attach site locator map. Tvoe of Decision: PC Exhibit P Application Number W12-52 ~ Wetland Boundary or Type 0No-Loss 0Exemption D Banking Plan D Sequencing D Replacement Plan Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendation (if any): D Approve D Approve with conditions 0Deny Summary (or attach): 2. LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT DECISION Date of Decision: 2/1/13 ~Approved D Approved with conditions (include below) 0Denied LGU Findings and Conclusions (attach additional sheets as necessary): A wetland delineation at the Wachman parcel (PID #0611723220018/located approximately 400 feet south of Bayside Road and south of 4665 & 4645 Bayside Road) in Orono was performed by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (KES) on October 12, 2012. The boundary & type were reviewed in the field on November 21, 2012 by Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) staff. One Type 4 wetland was identified on the property. The boundary & type described above and in the delineation report dated October 22, 2012 are approved by the MCWD. This decision is valid for five years. A project on this property may require a permit from the MCWD. F R 1 or eo acement Pl d' fr h St t W ti dB k ans usmg ere its omt e ae e an an: Bank Account # Bank Service Area County Credits Approved for Withdrawal (sq. ft. or nearest .01 acre) BWSRForms 7-1-10 Page 1 of3 Replacement Plan Approval Conditions. In addition to any conditions specified by the LGU, the approval of a Wetland Replacement Plan is conditional upon the following: D Financial Assurance: For project-specific replacement that is not in-advance, a financial assurance specified by the LGU must be submitted to the LGU in accordance with MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 (List amount and type in LGU Findings). D Deed Recording: For project-specific replacement, evidence must be provided to the LGU that the BWSR "Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants" and "Consent to Replacement Wetland" forms have been filed with the county recorder's office in which the replacement wetland is located. D Credit Withdrawal: For replacement consisting of wetland bank credits, confinnation that BWSR has withdrawn the credits from the state wetland bank as specified in the approved replacement plan. Wetlands may not be impacted until all applicable conditions have been met! LGU Authorized Si ature: Signing and mailing of this completed fonn to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 5 provides notice that a decision was made by the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. If additional details on the decision exist, they have been provided to the landowner and are available from the LGU u on re uest. Name Title Catherine Bach Signatur District Technician Date 2/1/13 Phone Number and E-mail (952) 641-4504 cbach@minnehahacreek.org TIIlS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO THE MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT. Additional approvals or pennits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required . Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. Applicants proceed at their own risk if work authorized by this decision is started before the time period for appeal (30 days) has expired. If this decision is reversed or revised under appeal, the applicant may be responsible for restoring or replacing all wetland impacts. This decision is valid for three years from the date of decision unless a longer period is advised by the TEP and specified in this notice of decision. 3. APPEAL OF Tms DECISION Pursuant to MN Rule 8420.0905, any appeal of this decision can only be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal, including applicable fee, within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice to the following as indicated: Check one: f8I Appeal of an LGU staff decision. Send petition and $0 fee (if applicable) to: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 18202 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 BWSR Fonns 7-1 -10 D Appeal of LGU governing body decision. Send petition and $500 filing fee to: Executive Director Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 Page 2 of3 4. LIST OF ADDRESSEES [8J SWCD TEP member: Stacey Lijewski -Stacey.lijewski@co.bennepin.mn.us [8J BWSR TEP member: Lynda Peterson -Lynda.peterson@state.mn.us D LGU TEP member (if different than LGU Contact): D DNR TEP member: [8J DNR Regional Office (if different than DNR TEP member): Melissa Doperalski - Melissa.doperalski@state.mn.us D WD or WMO (if applicable): [gl Applicant (notice only) and Landowner (if different): Bill Coffman -billcoffman@cbburnet.com [8J Members of the public who requested notice (notice only): Consultant: KES (Melissa Barrett) -Melissakjolbaugenv.com City: Christine Mattson -cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us [8J Corps of Engineers Project Manager (notice only): Melissa Jenny- Melissa.m.jenny@usace.army.mil D BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator (wetland bank plan applications only) 5. MAILING INFORMATION ) For a list of BWSR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn .us/aboutbwsr/workareas/WCA areas.pdf ), For a list of DNR TEP representatives : www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/wca/DNR TEP contacts.pdf )D fN JR R . alOffi epartment o atura esources e~10n ices: NW Region: NE Region: Central Region: Southern Region: Reg. Env. Assess . Ecol. Reg. Env . Assess . Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess . Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources 2115 Birchmont Be ach Rd. 1201 E. Hwy . 2 1200 Warner Road 261 Hwy. 15 South NE Grand Rapids, MN 55744 St. Paul, MN 55106 New Ulm, MN 56073 Bemidji, MN 56601 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions, see: htt,p://files.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dnr regions.pdf )For a list of Corps of Project Managers: www.mvp.usace.army.mil/regulatory/default.asp?pageid=687 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District, ATTN : OP-R 180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700 St. Paul, MN 55101-1678 ) For Wetland Bank Plan applications, also send a copy of the application to : Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul , MN 55155 6. ATTACHMENTS In addition to the site locator map, list any other attachments: D D 8 BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 3 of3 Note: Site boundaries on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ch lake L:,n wo od Blv d t)ioil$_qlon I nl£~ 1.V ,1 h:r town Rd 40 ~e,~ <J I.I ~ Site Location I D<1Y1 id e Rd' ~..= =====--D ~ N Arm [)r .. 0 I:! 0 ..c '"1 z 19 Jennings Bay Mound Seton i rllfO Fores t Saga Hill Lake West Ann Spri n g Park lake Clos5en W.)yzatc\ Bfvd w Oro no St ubbs Bay Arm Maxwell Bay Crystal 51 Bay ~U;( St Gth Ave N z 0 ~ 0 = j Lo ng La French Lake ~; ·q) s~ Ciystal Bay ts l St1 Minnetonka Be ach ~ Sho reli ne Dr ~ LafcJyette Bay ~" © 2D 2 l,lit;rosoft Corp:,r~tiD ® 20 2 No k:i;i; Figure 1-Site L ocation Map Wachman Parcel (KES No. 20 12-068) Orono, Minnesota No Scale JvoLHAuc ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES C OMPANY RECEIVED JAN 2 3 2013 CITY OF ORONO MINNEHAHA CREEK. WATERSHED DISTRl~T Pcexh;brta QUALITY OF WATER ., QUALITY OF LIFE Memo To: Melissa Barrett, Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company From: Catherine Bach, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District CC: Bob Molstad, Sathre-Berquist, Inc. Bill Coffman Date: January 17, 2013 Re: Wetland Functional Assessment (MnRAM) for PID #0611723220018 (Wachman Parcel) An application for approval of wetland boundary & type under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act wa s submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (District) on October 22, 2012 for the Wachman parcel (PID #0611723220018), which is located just south of 4665 & 4645 Bayside Road in the city of Orono. One wetland was determined to be on the property and is s hown on the attached survey. A wetland functional assessment using the current version of the Minnesota Routine Assessment Method (MnRAM 3.4) was submitted on January 3, 2013 for approval. The functional assessment is co ntained in the attached memo. In the Di strict's Functional Assessment of Wetlands inventory, the wetland is currently classified as Preserve. The wetland was classified as Manage 2 as a result of the functional assessment, and the District concurs with this classification. This memo serves as formal approval of the management cla ss ification of the wetland as Manage 2 for MCWD permitting require ments. En closed : Memo containing functional assessment Survey s howing wetland boundary _ _1 n_: 591 KjOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY Provicli"l Sound, &lanucl, ComprthtnsilJ< Natural R,souru Solutions Memorandum Date: January 3, 2012 To: Catherine Bach , Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Cc: Bob Molstad, Sathre-Berquist, Inc. From: Melissa Barrett, Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company Re: MNRAM Analysis -Wetland J, Wachman Parcel, Orono, MN According to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District wetland inventory, Wetland 1 of the Wachman Parcel is rated as a Preserve wetland. Wetland present on the Wachman Parcel is part of a larger PEMAd/PEMCd wetland complex that continues to the southeast and eventually connects (approximately 0.25 miles distance) to the North Arm of Lake Minnetonka shoreland system. Previously, wetland analyses performed for wetlands abutting shoreland have rated as Preserve due to the shoreline protection function . However, wetland present on the Wachman parcel does not provide shoreline protection. Wetland I was previously described as a Type 4 (PUBGx/PEMA) excavated, open water and fresh (wet) meadow wetland complex (Wachman Parcel Wetland Delineation Report dated October 22, 2012). At the time of the delineation, the PUBGx portion of the wetland was un- vegetated and dry. The center of the basin was an upland knoll dominated by a canopy of boxelder . For the purposes of the delineation it was included within the wetland boundary. Fresh (wet) meadow was dominated by reed canary grass with lesser amounts of giant goldenrod and Canada thi stle. Other non-dominant vegetation observed included: garlic mustard, asters, blue vervain, sedge, black willow, boxelder, and American elm. In addition to the excavated basin, an excavated ditch connected the basin to the east property line. MNRAM Analysis A MNRAM version 3.4 functional analysis was completed for Wetland 1 on the Wachman Parcel to assess appropriate wetland functions and management class based on current, on-site observations. A MNRAM output summary and input data are included in Appendix A, and results are summarized in Table 1 below. 26105 Wild Rose Lane , Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 , Phone: 952-401-8757, Fax: 952-401-8798 T bl 1 MNRAM 3 4 A I • R It ti W ti d 1 W h a e . . na1vs1s esu s or e an ac man P reel. a Function Rating Veg Diversity/Integrity Low Hydrology -Characteristic Moderate Flood Attenuation Moderate Water Quality -Downstream Moderate Water Quality-Wetland Moderate Shoreline Protection NIA Wildlife Habitat Structure Moderate Fish Habitat NIA Amphibian Habitat NIA Aesthetics/Recreational/ .... Low Stormwater Sensitivity Moderate Conclusion Based on current, site specific conditions the management classification for Wetland 1 of the Wachman Parcel is Manage 2 based on the highest rated function of Moderate for Wildlife Habitat. We are seeking concurrence with this management class determination from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District at this time. Thank you. ', .. ~ . APPENDIX A MNARAM Analysis-Wetland 1, Wachman Parcel , Orono, MN Wetland Functional Assessment Summary Wetland Name Wachman Orono WL 1 Hydrogeomorphology DepressionaVFlow-through (apparent inlet and outlet), Depressional/Flow-throug h (apparent inlet and outlet) Maintenance of Maintenance of Aesthetics! Characteristic Maintenance of Characteristic Recreation! Wildlife Habitat Characteristic Amphibian Education! Maintenance of Hydrologic Regime 0.52 Moderate Flood! Stormwater! Attenuation 0.38 Moderate Ground- Water Maintenance D ownstream of Wetland Water Quality 0.57 Moderate Water S h oreline Quality Protection 0.54 0 .00 Moderate Not Applicable Additional Information Wetland Sensitivity Additional Stormwater Treatment to Stormwater Wetland Name Strncture Fish Habitat Habitat Cultural Commercial Uses Interaction Wetland Restoratio n Potential and Urban Development Needs Wachman Orono WL 1 0 .42 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 Combination 0.00 0.10 0.54 Di scharge, Recha rge Moderate Not Applicable Not Applicable Low Not Applicable Not Applicable Moderate Mode rate Wetland Community Summary Vegetative Diversity/Integrity Community Weighted Individual Highest Average Average Cowardin Circular Plant Wetland Community Wetland Wetland Wetland Wetland Name location Classification 39 Community Proportion Rating Rating Rating Rating Wach man Orono WL 1 27-117-23-06-001 PEM1A Type 1 Fresh (Wet) Meadow 70 0.1 0.10 0.10 0 .10 Low Low Low PUBG Type 4 Shallow, Open Water 30 0.1 0.10 0.10 0.10 Communities Low Low Low 100 0.10 0.10 0.10 0 Denotes incomplete calculation data. Thursday, January 03, 2013 Page 1 of 1 D MnRAM: Site Response Record Fo r Wetland: Wachman Orono WL 1 Location: 27-117-23-0 6-001 Wachman Site Orono Pla nt Community: Fresh (Wet) Meadow Cowardin Classification: Circular 39: PEM1A Type 1 Plant Co mmunity: Shallow, Open Water C Cowa rdin Classification: Circular 39: PUBG Type4 4 listed, rare. special species? ~ 5 Rare community or habitat? ~ 6 Pre-European-settlement condition? ~ Hydrogeomorphology I topography: 7 Depressional/FlowThru 8-1 Maxim um water depth 8-2 % inundated 9 Immediate drainage--/oca/ WS JO Esimated si=elexisting site: I I-Upland Soil I I-Wetland Soil 12 Outlet for flood control 13 Outlet for hydro regime 14 Dominant upland land use 15 Wetland soil condition 16 Vegetation ("/o cove,) 17 Emerg. vegjlood resistance 18 Sediment delivery 19 Upland soils (soil group) 20 Stormwater nmoff 21 Subwatershed wetland density 22 Channels/sheet flow 23 Adjacent buffer widlh Adjacent area management 24-A Full 24-B Manicured 24-C Bare Oinches 0% 20 acres (see #66) ~ ~ 0 [!] 110% I ~ 0 [!] [!] [!] ~ 50 feet I 1100%1 Io% I I o% I Adjacent area diversity/structure 25-A Na tive I o% I 25-B Mixed 1100%\ 25-C Sparse I o% I Adjacent area slope 26-A Gentle 26-B Moderate 26-C Steep 27 Downstream sens.lWQ protect. 28 Nutrient loading 29 Shoreline wetland? Sl,ore/ine Wetland 3 O Rooted veg .. % cover 3 l Wetland in-water width 32 Emerg. veg. erosion resistance 33 Erosion potential of site 34 Upslope veg/bank protection 35 Rare wildlife? 36 Scare/Rare/S/IS2 community 37 Vegetative cover 38 Veg. community interspersion 39 Wetland detrittrs 40 Interspersion on landscape 41 Wildlife barriers Amphibian-breeding potential 42 Hydroperiod adequacy I 43 Fish presence 44 Ovenvintering habitat 45 Wildlife species (list) 46 Fish habitat quality 47 Fish species (list) 48 Unique/rare opportunity 49 Wetland visibility 50 Proximity to population 51 Public ownership 52 Public access 53 Human influence on wetland 54 Human influence on viewshed 55 Spatial buffer 56 Recreational activity potential ~ ~ ~ 1°% I I O feet D D D ~ ~ tE 0 0 0 Inadequate 0 ~ I NA I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 57 Commercial crop--hydro impact ~ Grou11dwa ter-specific questions 58 Wetland soils Recharge 59 Subwatershed land use Recharge 60 Wetland size/soil group Discharge 61 Wetland hydroperiod Recharge 62 Inlet/Outlet configuration Discharge 63 Upland topo relief Discharge Additional information 64 Restoration potential No 65 LO affected by restoration 66 Existing size ffi Restorable size Potential new wetland 67 Average width of pot. b11jfer O feet 68 Ease of potential restoration 69 Hydro/ogic alterations 70 Potential wetland type 71 Stormwater sensitivity 72 Additional treatm ent needs Watershed WS# Service Area: 0 0 B A For functional ratings, please run the Summary tab report. This report printed on: 1/3/2013 Management Classification Report for Wach man Orono Wll ID: 29 Wachman Site Orono HENNEPIN County Watershed, # Corps Bank Service Area Based on the Mn RAM data input from field and office review and using the classification settings as shown below, this wetland is classified as Manage 2 Functional rank of this wetland based on MnRAM data Functional Category Self-defined classification value settings for this management level Low J Moderate Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Low Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Not Applicabl e Moderate Vegetative Diversity/Integrity Habitat Structure (wildlife) Amphibian Habitat Fish Habitat Shoreline Protection Aesthetic/Cultural/Rec/Ed and Habitat Stormwater/Urban Sensitivity and Vegetative Diversity Wetland Water Quality and Vegetative Diversity Characteristic Hydrology and Vegetative Diversity Flood/Stormwater Attenuation* Commericial use* Downstream Water Quality* The critical function that caused this wetland to rank as Manage 2 was Maintenance of Characteristic Wildlife Habitat Structure Details of the formula for this act ion are shown below: Moderate Moderate Low Moderate Low Moderate/ Low -I - -I - -I - M aintenance of Characteristic Wildlif e Habitat Str (Q3e*2+Q39+Q37+Q38+Q40+Q41 +(Q23+Q24+Q2 5 )/3+Q 13+Q20)/10 Question Value Description 13 0 .1 Outlet: hydrologic regime 20 0.5 Stormwater runoff 23 0.5 Buffer width 24 1 Adjacent area Management 25 0 .5 Adjacent area diversity 37 0.1 Vegetation cover interspersion 38 0.1 Community interspersion 39 0.5 Detritus • T he classification valu e se ttings for these function s are not adjust able Management Classification Report for Wachman Orono WU ID : 29 3e 40 41 0.1 1 1 <No Description Found> Wetland interspersion/landscape Wildlife barriers This report was printed on: Thursday, January 03, 2013 * Th e classification value settings for these function s are not adjustable Wachman Site Orono HENNEPIN County Watershed, # Corps Bank Service Area >-"' 0009"9.::.-(ZS&) L6£'S'S ·N~ 'V!VZAVM AVMIJWOOB Hl OOS O',L "8NI '1s1nm:n:138·3~H1 vs S3WOH \f3ANO£J 'v'l0S3NN1W 'ONOlelO 13::Jt:ll/d Nl/!'JH:)1/M d' NOll'·.'r'>;,JI ar: 113,'.', ~ • • 0 ~ E:3C>L TC>N & "-/1 EN K. , I NC® Consulting Engin eers & Surveyors 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Phone (952) 448-8838 • Fax (952) 448-8805 February 7, 2013 City of Orono Attn: Melanie Curtis PO Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 RE: Preliminary Plat Application 13-3591 www.bolton-menk.com Baysi de Meadows (formerly Outlot C, Bayview Farms 2nd Addition) Engineering Review #1 Dear Melanie: As requested, we have completed an engineering review of the documents submitted for the above referenced project. Our current review is based on the following submittal items: • Subdivision Application; dated 1/23/13 • Resolution Approving Preliminary Plat of Bayview Farms 2nd Addition, dated 10/24/94 • Resolution Approving Final Plat of Bayview Farms 2nd Addition, dated 11/14/94 • Resolution Approving Lot Line Rearrangement of Properties, dated 2/12/96 • Development Narrative prepared by Coffman Development Services, dated 1/23/13 • Lot Calculations prepared by Sathre-Bergquis t , dated 1/18/1 3 • Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, dated 1/17 /13 • Geotechnical Memorandum prepared by Haugo Geotechnical Services, dated 1/10/13 • Wetland D eli neation Report prepared by Kjolhaug E nvironmental , dated 10/22/1 3 • Natural Resources Inventory Memorandum prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental, dated 1/22/13 • MCWD Approval of Wetland Boundary and Reclassification, dated 1/17 /13 • Preliminary Plans pre pared by Sathre-Bergquist, dated 1/15/13 o Preliminary Site Plan o Existing Conditions Plan o ALT A Survey o Preliminary Plat o Preliminary Grading and Erosion Control Plan o Preliminary Street Plan o Preliminary Planting Plans (3 Sheets) o 250 ' Aerial Site Plan o Site Conservation Plan • Conservation Design Report memorandum prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental; dated 2/6/13 We offer the following observations, comments, and recommendations for your consideration: 1.0 GENERAL: PC Exhibit R 1.1 A legend, defining significant features and lines, should be included on each plan to aid in reading plan sheets. cg Preliminary Plat Application 13-3591 Bayside Meadows Page 2 1.2 The benchmark should be labeled on all plans. 1.3 Drainage calculations for the proposed stormwater pond currently meet City requirements. Proposed runoff rates will be restricted to less than existing runoff rates. However, plan revisions may affect peak discharge rates. Therefore, a Final Stormwater Management Plan should be submitted with the Final Construction Plans. Also , an outlet control structure detail should be included with the Final Plans. 1.4 Drainage calculations must be submitted as part of the Final Plans to confirm sizing of all culverts. 1.5 As part of the Final Plans, Drainage and Utility easements must be placed over the wetland, wetland buffer, stormwater pond , and all ditching and culverts directing runoff to the pond or wetland. The easements should be shown on the Final Plat and Final Street, Utility, and Grading Plans. 1.6 The estimated cost of proposed street and utility improvements must be s ubmitted as part of the Final Plat process for determination of the total Letter of Credit amount. A Letter of Credit written to 150% of cost of improvements must be submitted prior to any land disturbing activities. 1.7 New development triggers the wetland protection ordinance requirements. Therefore, the following should be considered: a. This wetland is listed as a "management 2" wetland in the MCWD's Functional Assessment of Wetlands inventory, which requires a 25 foot buffer and 20 foot s tructure setback. The proposed buffer exceeds and the setback meets City requirements. b. The Wetland Delineation Report lists Canada Thistle, which i s considered to be an invasive species, and should be listed for control in the Vegetation Management Plan. c. Wetland Buffer markers should be placed at the upland boundary of the buffer edge located at lot lines and changes of buffer edge directio n and spaced a maximum 200 feet apart. d. Estimated landscaping costs for vegetation management and buffer establishment will need to be submitted for determination of total Letter of Credit amount as part of the Final Plat process. 1.8 Septic reports indicating suitable primary and alternate sites for on-site sewage treatment sys tems mu st be s ubmitted for review and approval. 1.9 The Conservation M as ter Design Report should be revised to begin removal of invasive species at time of rough grading, instead of relying on the landowners who purchase the lot s. The Home Owner Association document s should also include requirements and procedures for invasive species removal. 1.10 Proposed well loc ations should be shown on the Final Plans. Wells mu st be setback 3 feet minimum from structures and 50 feet minimum from septic systems. 1.11 Payment of park dedication fees mu st be submitted to the City prior to Final Plat approval. 1.12 The Home Owners Agreement (HOA) documents should be submitted for review. The following items should be included: a. Road Maintenance Plan b. Pond Maintenance Plan c. Monument Maintenance Plan d. Invasive Species Control 1.1 3 The applicant will be required to obtain Hennepin County approval and permitting for connection to County Road 84 and installation of the culvert in County Right-Of-Way. A copy of any approvals or permits required should be s ubmitted prior to Final Plat Approval. 1.14 The applicant will be required to obtain Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) appro va l and permitting for erosion control. A copy of any approvals or permit s requir ed should be submitted prior to Final Plat approval. Since the development i s proposing le ss than 20% impervious surface, no sto rmwater management permitting from MCWD should be required. cg Preliminary Plat Application 13-3591 Bayside Meadows Page 3 2.0 SITE PLAN: 2.1 Per the City of Orono's Resolution No. 3492 approving the plat of Bayview Farms 2nd Addition and the agreement between Owners, the driveway location for 4665 Bayside Road must be revised onto the private road and the access to Bayside Road must be eliminated. 2.2 Protection fencing should be installed around potential septic areas to ensure they are not impacted by construction. The protection fencing locations should be inspected and approved by the City Engineer prior to any land disturbing activities. 3.0 PRELIMINARY PLAT: 3.1 Outlot A of Bayview Farms 2nd Addition should be combined with Lot I Block 1. 3.2 Lot 1 Block 1 of Bayview Farms 2nd Addition was combined with the small lot shown on the southwest corner containing the existing shed and the easements were vacated accordingly. The plat should be revised to correctly depict the lot lines and easements. 3.3 Two variances will be required for the proposed plat: a. The length of the cul-de-sac (1068') exceeds the maximum allowed (1000'). b. The radius of the proposed road centerline is less than the required minimum 275' in two locations. The radius is proposed to be 100' at approximate station 4+00 and 250' at approximate station 9+00. 3.4 The Conservation Master Design Report memorandum indicates conservation easements should be placed over the tree stands located in the southeast comer of the site and along the west property line. It also indicates that a conservation easement s hould be placed over the sloping grassland loc ated north of the existing wetland. These easements are shown on the Site Conservation Plan and should be recorded with the Final Plat process. 3.5 Outlot A requires a road and utilities easement over the entire area. The easement s hould be ge ne rated u sing the standard city form and recorded as part of the Final Plat process. 4.0 GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN: 4.1 Riprap should be placed on the down stream end of all culverts for energy dissipation. 4.2 A Stormwater Pollution Preve ntion Plan (SWPPP) will need to be submitted as part of the Final Plan s. The SWPPP should include a project narrative, erosion control note s, erosion control inst allation schedule, erosion control mainte nance sc hedule , pollution prevention notes , location and details of proposed erosion control devices. 4.3 Grading for road construction is proposed onto Lot 1 Block I and Lot 1 Block 2 of Bayview Farms 2nd Addition. Construction easements s hould be obtained from each lot owner for this work and submitted to the City for review. 4.4 A legend defining or notes labeling proposed erosion control devices should be added to confirm adequate erosion control will be provided. 5.0 PRELIMINARY STREET PLAN: 5.1 The proposed street section design meets the recommendation s outlined in the Geotechnical Report and City standards . 5.2 A minimum paved width of 24 ' is required for pri va te roads per City code. The plans currently propo se a width of 20'. Therefore, the plans must be revi se d to meet City requirements. 0 Preliminary Plat Application 13-3591 Bayside Meadows Page4 5 .3 The proposed vertical curve at s tation 7+50 does not meet required standards. Per the State Aid Manual for Sag Vertic al Curves , a minimum K value equal to 36 is required for the 30 mph design, and a K value equal to 35.79 is proposed. The profile should be revi sed to meet minimum s tanda rds . 5.4 The vertical profile i s extremely steep at the location of the proposed 100' radius hori z ontal curve (approximate station 4+00). The combination of steep slope and tight curve could create safety concern s during snowy or icy conditions . The applicant should consider modifying the road layout to le ssen the slope and increas e the radius . 6.0 PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN: 6.1 Tree c a lculations should be shown on the Planting Plan. One shade tree is required for every 40' of road frontage. 6.2 Tree preservation and removal should be included with the Planting Plan so the extent of tree clearing can be field verified. Ple ase let me know if you have any ques tion s or need additional information. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC. Robert E. B e an, Jr., P.E. Water Resources E n g ineer Melanie Curtis From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Hi Melanie , Carla. Stueve@co. hennepin. mn. us Tuesday, February 12 , 2013 11 :12 AM Melanie Curtis Robert.Byers@co .hennepin.mn.us; Steve.Groen@co.hennepin .mn.us Preliminary Plat Review -Outlot C , Bayside Meadows 2nd Addition PC Exhibit S Thank you again for sending us the preliminary plat for the Bayside Meadows 2nd Addition (Outlot C), located south of CSAH 84 (Bayside Road), east of CSAH 19. We discussed this at the county Plat Review Committee today. Based on our review, the county continues to support consolidation of these driveways. Allowing two closely spaced driveways would not be recommended for traffic flow and safety reasons. CSAH 84 (Bayside Road) is classified as a collector roadway , which would require 1/8-mile (660 feet) access spacing based on our county access spacing guidelines. Since this will require a future permit, we are currently researching the original permit for the L 1-B1 property to determine what was included for access to this property, since that may be used as a basis for the future permit. Please let me know if you need anything further from us prior to your Planning Commission meeting next week. Thank You! Carla Carla Stueve, P.E. I Transportation Engineer Hennepin County Transportation Department 11600 Prairie Drive I Medina , MN 55340 Office 612.596 .0356 I Cell 612.868.66771 Email ca rl a.stueve@co.hennepin .mn .u s Disclaimer: Information in this message or an atta chment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes , Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney-client or work product privilege , may be confidential , privileged , proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthori zed review , copying, retransmission , or other use or di sclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended re c ipient of this message , please immediately notify the sender of the transm is sion error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system . 1 Melanie Curtis From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Thomas Kunik (assessor) Tuesday, February 12 , 2013 7:46 AM Melanie Curtis Re: Preliminary Plat 13-3591 Wachman Parcel 4.0 Wachman -BM -PP.PDF PC Exhibit T Melanie, It appears that there are 5-sites and each of those sites would get the maximum of $5,500 per residential unit. The A.Y.2013 value as farm land divided by the 5-sites is $85,000 x .08=$6800. Obviously the value of each lot will be increasing after we get information on the division due to the property type change and use change to somewhere in the area of $200 ,000-$250,000. If you have questions please call me on my cell-612-802-9861, I will be downtown in meetings all day. Thomas M. Kunik , AMA Appraiser Hennepin County Assessors Office A-2103 Government Center Minneapolis.Mn. 55487 thomas.kunik@co.hennepin.mn. us Office:(612)348-3046; Fax:(612)348-8751 Melanie Curtis <MCurtis@ci.orono.mn.us> 02/11/2013 07 :11 PM Tom &Mike To ''Thomas Kunik (assessor)" <thomas.kunik@co.hennepin.mn.us>, "Michael Smerdon (assessor)" <michael.smerdon@co.hennepin.mn.us> cc Subject Preliminary Plat 13-3591 Wachman Parcel The Orono Planning Commission will be reviewing a subdivision of property located at The Orono Planning Commission will be reviewing a subdivision of property located at Outlot C, Bayview Farms 2"d Addition within the RR-1B single family, 2 acre rural residential district. The property's surveyor has determined the lot area is 13.72 gross acres (a copy of the proposed subdivision is attached). Payment of Park Dedication fees is determined as 8% of the fair market value of land being subdivided, or a maximum of $5,550 per residential dwelling unit. Please note, only the new lot(s) is subject to the fee. Please calculate the fair market value of the new lot to be subdivided off and provide it to me by Wednesday, February 13 (sorry for the short notice). The City is anticipating this application to be heard before the Planning Commission at their February 19th meeting. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks -Melanie Melanie Curtis Planning & Zoning Coordinator City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Direct Dial: 952.249.4627 Fax : 952.249.4616 1 ----e c... )> ;:: fTI (/) :!!i::: 00 'II, ;o I 0 Ol> ~zo :::jR-J ~o~ f'r,,J,.,, .. NCI) o;o 0 )> N-U NC [;:j c... -u )> -;:: ofTI ,.(/) ~R'o :::jei NC1"1 (,j fTI ;o N .. NO oN oC NCl1 (,I)> -< -< ;u m m -a ill CJ) m ;u ;; -< 5 z m l> CJ) m ;:: m z -< -u 6 'II, fTI I ;o o- o,Zo ~~i NrfTI ~~~ N )> gz N .i,. I I I OWNER : IRVIN & MARJORIE GEFFRE PID#-0611723220017 IMn & M a,)o,1e ~ffre 4665BaysideRd 2..lSAcres PA:~~TERS SREE I< --------- (_COUN TY ROAD N O . t:4 1 --__ -,-- ' BAYSIDE ROAB ! ~ 1.1 ll ; Bayfield Fann: 2nd Ado i ~ --\c \ *-~' n S,<- 0 0 ( (. -L-.., -.9.l!e I 'Or . (989 ....... .,,,, ·O) L _ -,------· -· - gj -,--- gl Lot 3 11 ~45 Sq Ft ~5Ac. 0 "" •L -, ,<o ,.... ' r -\ ,.... \ In I <:. "' \a;. I \u,\ I I \ \<!).\ • \ '8\ le:.\ I+ '8 \ \ ~:,... \ ; I I ";.\ \~ \ >\ \ \ \V,.... \.,J I I Elk: & Ellzabelh Sims 4645 Bayside Rd 2.76 Acres OWNER: ERIC & ELIZABETH SIMS PID#-0611723220009 Ll 82 Bayfield Fan ns 2nd Add ---- ............ ... ....... ................. "' .... .. ... •• . ... • ", r -·-·-- ~-y AO, . I , / ~"' ~,('v ~ f~~\9 t,': I ," I O -~· \ 0 0 I I •5...-, rr \ . .,.,.... .. \ Lot 2 9 8,63 1 Sq Ft 2 .26 Ac . I I --- ~-... ... ... ... "' ... ,r \ ('~ ' \\ \~ ,,~ \ \f, \"'+ ,I\<!).+ \ ,e,l " ' ~\ I----:-"'" \ ' \ ~ ,, \ I I -u fTI --4 :!!~ ~11:' b(/) ~?;o ~ ;o :::E -.JQZ ~z~ ~;:i·· Oz Oz ~lil 0 I ;:: m :a; l> m CJ)-< m> riiz zo -< () ~ CJ) m ?i! ~ 5 z D -a ;o m CJ) m ;u < l> -< 5 z ~ m ,:: m z -< \\ ..... _.J\ ¥ ... ) I \_.-:::::45_ -\-/•'> ,.__ \, ' ----------\.,/!i.'!.. --~ J ,:. '-1 ----' ~ lo 1:. ____ w ,'lilio...----- ()Wl\ll'"R• ()wti..l~R· RECEIVED FEB ·, 2 2013 CITY OF ORONO "'C (") m >< ::r C" ;::;: C Chapt er 78 -Zoning Regulations PC Exhibit V Sec. 78-420. -Area, height, lot width and yard requirements. (a) Height. No structure or building in the RR-18 district sha ll exceed 2Yi stories and shall not exceed 30 feet in height except as provided in section 78-1366 (b) Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be observed: j I --.- I I 1side i Lot j Lot Front Side Yard I Rear !Area Width Yard Yard Adjacent Yard I (acres) (feet) (feet) (feet) I I I Jso 12 1200 130 ' to Street j (feet) (feet) I r; so _J (Code 1984, § 10.28(5); Ord. No. 18 3rd series, § 3, 9-27-2004) ARTICLE XII. -CONSERVATION DE SIG N Sec. 78-1631. -Pur pose and inte nt. The City of Orono as a result of the Rural Oasis Study conducted in 2005 finds that there is an intrinsic link between the natural systems and the valued scen i c character that exist throughout the community. The requi rements of this conse rvation design ordinance are meant to preserve and enhance this ecological/aesthetic character by requiring: (1) protection and enhancement of drainageways and water qual ity; (2) protection and enhancement of ecological communities; (3) reinforcement and establishment of eco logica l connections throughout the city; (4) augmentation and preservation of viewsheds i ncluding corridor enclosure and buffering; (5) preservation and improvement of views; and (6) preservation or reinterpretation of local landmarks. (Ord. No. 67 3rd series,§ 1, 1-11 -2010) Sec. 78-1632 . -Appli ca bility. The Conservation Design Master Planning requirements of this article apply to all proposed residential subdivisions or multi-unit residential developments greater than five acres in tota l area or guided for urban density (greater than one unit per two acres). (Ord. No. 67 3 rd series,§ 1, 1-11-2010) Sec. 78-1633. -Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in thi s section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Conservation design means a two-phased approach to design and development that maintains or improves eco logical assets, provides infrastructure that works with the land, and incorporates people's instinctive de sire to experience nature. Some conservation design strategies include: identifyi ng and avoiding sensit ive natural features, p lanning roads along contours, allowing lots to border natura l open space, integrating ecological stormwater management, using sma ll er lots, and educating developer and buyers about the ecological values of the landscape. The first phase entails an inventory and ana l ysis of the potential development site's natural features, existing land uses , and wetland delineation. The second phase entails ana lyzing the design impl ications of the findings from the in itial phase, alternative stormwater design, and a conceptual design for road and lot layouts. Minnesota Land Caver Classification System (MLCCS) means the Minnesota Land Cover Classificat ion System (MLCCS) d isplays data on natural/semi-natural and cultural cover types at the highest level of classification. The next four leve ls of classification each reveal further specifications such as plant types, soil hydrology, hardcover and plant species. Using MLCCS data is the first step in producing a natural resource inventory of a deve l opment site. Orono Natural Resource Inven t ory means an element of the Orono Community Management Plan that displays the ecologica l connections w i thin and beyond the City of Orono. Page 1 Corridor enclosure means the nature, appearance and relative degrees of screening provided by roadside vegetation. Corridor enclosure types include: Open enclosure: Long views beyond the right-of-way, no real sense of corridor enclosure. Edged enclosure: Solid wall of vegetation along roadside, views focused along corridor. Tunneled enclosure: Vegetation begins to completely enclose roadway, above and sides, creating a "s mall scale" roadway experience. Varied enclosure: Enclosure changes rapidly along corridor, short stretches of open, edged, and tunneled corridor. View analysis means the process of determining whether a view is positive or negative. Positive views: Views of natu ra l areas, water bodies, established parks, wetlands, rural and historic land uses. Negative views: Views of structures, particularly multi-family residential, institutional, and commercial and industrial uses. Views of power lines, telephone poles and other utility infrastructure. Landmark preservation and enhancement means preserving and maintaining distinct cultural features, landmarks and unique points of local character, both natural and man-made, to maintain a familiar se nse of place in the community. Ecolagical Management Categories: Level 1: Ecological "off-limits" areas, including wetlands and required buffers, historic drainage. Level 2: Ecological opportunities, including existing degraded drainageways and existing degraded ecosystem remnants. Level 3: Ecological possibilities: Areas suitable for stormwater treatment. Note: These Ecological Management Categories are not intended to directly correlate with MLCCS M-34X Natural Community Quality Modifiers. Significant tree stand means a grouping or cluster of coniferous and/or deciduous trees with contiguous crown cover, occupying 500 or more square feet of property, which are comprised of deciduous trees six inches or larger in diameter (d.b.h .) or coniferous trees 12 feet or more in height. Additionally, those forest or woodland remnants identified as high, moderate or good quality in the Orono Natural Resources Inventory shall be cons id ered as significant tree stands . (Ord. No. 67 3rd ser ies ,§ 1, 1-11-2010; Ord. No. 94 3rd series,§ 9, 9-24-2012) DIVISION 2. -BASIC APPL/CATION AND PLAN REQUIREMENTS Sec. 78-1634. -Application requirements and procedures. The developer sha ll follow the steps outlined below as part of the development review process: (1) Review and respond to the Goals and Policies for Environmental Protection and Natural Resource Management as established in the Orono Community Management Plan and the recom menda tio ns contained within the Orono Natural Resources Inventory. The intent is to establish the property's ecological connectio ns both within Orono and as part of the regional eco logical system . (2) If the property exists adjacent to a documented co rrid or in the Rural Oasis Study, review and respond to the existi ng aesthetic and ecological analysis. (3) If the property is not adjacent to a documented corridor in the Rural Oasis Study, developer shall have a qualified consultant prepare a simi lar analysis and submit it to the city for review. This analysis shall include the documentation of views, co rridor enc losure, and landmarks through a plan analysis and photographs. Developer shall be charged a standard fee established in the city fee schedule to cover the expenses of the c ity in hiring a consultant to review the eco logi ca l site analysis submitted by the developer. (4) Additionally, subm it a natural resources in ventory of the site, in cl uding all of the following elements : a. Review of the MLCCS data pertinent to the site. b. Tree survey, includ ing all significant individual trees greater than six feet diameter, and stands of trees, identifying tree species and size. c. Wetland inventory, i n cluding delineation reports . d . Topographi c survey indicating existing drainage patterns. e. Analysis of the site based on the findings and recommendations of the Orono Natural Resources Inv ent o ry with regards to: • Conceptual greenways and open space corridors; Page 2 • Existence of rare plant communities; • Potential need for proactive management and protection. (Ord. No. 67 3rd series,§ 1, 1-11-2010} Sec. 78-1635. -Basic Conservation Design Master Plan requirements and evaluation criteria . The developer shall prepare a Conservation Design Master Plan for development of the property, consisting of written and visual documentation including maps in an acceptable electronic format, addressing the following topics: {l) Consideration of the existing drainage system; (2) Establishment of a stormwater management system, using multi-cell treatment principles, and defining proposed methods of stormwater phosphorus reduction; (3) Removal of invasive species and diseased trees; (4) Protection of significant tree stands and woodlands that support scenic and/or ecological goals, includ ing mitigation of any such sta nds to be impacted by development activities; (5) Protection of existing wetlands, includ ing augmentation of buffers, mitigation of impacts, and enhancement of degraded systems; (6) Just ification and mitigation of any negative impa ct to ecological communities. "Negative impact" includes any modification to a lower level of ecological community quality, as described by the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (M-34X Modifiers); (7) Maintenance of ecological connections through si te design, as shown on the Orono Natural Resource Inventory; {8) Maintenance and protection of existing positive views, and mitigation of any existing or proposed negative views using appropriate measures such as site layout, screening, building design and coloration, etc.; and {9) Preservation or reinterpre tation of existing landmarks. The p lanning commission and city council shall evaluate the Conservation Design Master Plan to determine whether the proposed development: (1) Preserves existing drainage patterns and enhances stormwater collection and conveyance by app lying an eco logica lly-ba sed multi-cell stormwater managem e nt sys t em that improves ecosystems by reducing reliance on manmade infrastructure, reducing downstream ru noff of contaminants, and enhancing ecological connections; (2) Inc lude s a program for the removal of inva sive species and diseased trees; protects significant tree stands and woodlands that support scenic and/or eco log ica l goals; and includes mitigation of any such stands that will be impacted by development activities; (3) Protects existing wetlands by im plementing new buffers or augmenting existing buffers; mitigates identified wetland impacts; and enhances degraded wetland systems; (4) Results in no negative impact to eco log ica l comm unities of Ecologica l Management Categories 1 and 2; results in no negative modification of any eco logi cal communities as described by the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System; and establishes, maintains and improves native ecologica l communities including natural and semi-natural area s to provide wildlife habitat and support na tu ra l ecological functions (i.e. drainage, filtering, buffering, etc.); (5) Establishes or maintains ecological connections through site design, as shown on the Orono Natural Resource Inventory that will enhance stormwate r collection and conveyance, promote ecological and wildlife corridors, and provide recreational opportunities for re si dents; (6) Preserves and where appropriate augments or improves roadway corridor enc losure to promote community aesthetics associated with the city's rural character; pre serves open rural views and other aesthetic elements of the land scape; and mitigates the negative visual impacts of development; {7) Preserves, maintains, or reinterprets existing landmarks and unique points of loca l character, and preserves distinct cu ltu ra l features that will maintain a familiar sense of place in the community. (Ord. No. 67 3rd ser ies,§ 1, 1-11-2010) DIVISION 3. -DENSITY BONUS STANDARDS Sec. 78-1636. -Density bonuses for urban density development. For residential development in Orono's defined urban area (zoning districts allowing densities in excess of one unit per two acres, and including properties identified in the Orono Community Management Plan for conversion to urban density) within the range s of the gu ided density a density bonus may be allowed if the city council finds that the performance bonus requirements of this division have been met. T h e city council shall det ermine the exte nt of density bonus awarded for such properties. Examp le: Prop erties g uid ed in t he Community Managem ent Pl a n Page 3 for a density range of two-four un its per acre have a base density of two units per acre; while the high end of the density range is not guaranteed, the city council at its discretion may allow development at a final density of u p to four units per acre through the performance bonus process. (Ord. No. 67 3rd series,§ 1, 1-11-2010) Sec. 78-1637. -Performance bonus requirements. Within the urban density area, developers have the opportunity to increase the base density by going above and beyond the Basic Conservation Design Master Plan requirement. By implementing a combi nation of development enhancements that not only preserve but improve the natural characte risti cs of the property or preserve and enhance existing landmarks, the developer shall become eligible for a density bonus. The extent of such density bonus shall be determined by the city council. Development enhancements include but are not necessaril y limited to the following: (1) Reforestation beyond existing woodland limits; (2) Water quality improvements; (3) Improvements in ecological grade of existing communities; (4) Upgrading of edge buffering to maximum, or tunneled, cha racte r; and (5) Major preservation or enhancement of existing landmarks. (Ord. No. 67 3rd series,§ 1, 1-11-2010) DIVISION 4. -LONG-TERM PRESERVATION Sec. 78-1638. -Preservation requirements. The developer shall establish and implement measures that will ensure the preservation and maintenance of those elements of the development that are determined to re quire long-term or permanent protection from development or misuse . Such measures may include but are not limited to: conservation easements; deed restrictions; private covenants; transfer of ownership to agencies such as the Minnesota Land Trust or the Nature Conservancy, or to the city via dedication, etc. (Ord . No . 67 3rd ser i es,§ 1, 1-11-2010) Sec. 78-1639. -Buyer education. The developer sha ll establish covenants documenting the e lements of the development to be protected and how they are to be protected, and shal l establ ish a defined program for education of the initial purchasers of lots within the development as to the limitations that affect future use of the property. (Ord. No. 67 3rd series,§ 1, 1-11-2010) DIVISION 5. -RESOURCES Sec. 78 -1640. -Resources. The primary references for faci litating the conservation design process include the following: • Orono Rural Oasis Study (DSU, 2005). • 2008 -2030 City of Orono Community Management Plan , Chapter 3A-Environmental Protection Plan (City of Orono, 2009). • Orono Natural Resources Inventory (Hennepin County Department of Environmental Services/Bonestroo Natural Resources Group, 2006). • Minnesota Land Cover Classificati on System (MLCC S). (Ord. No. 67 3rd se rie s,§ 1, 1-11-2010) \ Page 4 Chapter 82 -Subdivision Regulations DIVISION 3. -ROADS AND PUBLIC WAYS Sec. 82-281. -Design standards. (a) Generally. In order to provide for roads of suitab le location, width and improvement to accommodate prospective traffic and afford satisfactory access to police, firefighting, snow removal, sanitation and road maintenance equipment, and to coordinate roads so as to co mpose a convenient system and avoid undue hardships to adjoining properties, the following design sta ndards for roads are required: (1) Road surfacing and improvements. After the sewer and wa ter utilities have been installed by the subdivider, the subdivider shall construct a ll road pa veme nt, shoulders, drainage improvements and structures, curbs, culs-de -sac, and sidewalks in conformance with all construction standards and specifications adopted by the ci ty and shall be incorporated into the construction plan s required to be submitted to the subdivider for final subdivision approval. (2) Rights-of-way. Rights-of-way shall be in accordance with the following performance standard: a. Minimum righ t-of -way widths. ) Principa l arterial, intermediate art~~ial As recomme nded by the State Department of Transportation I ·----.----------------_J r Minor arterial 80 fee t r--------- !Collector ' 70 feet ! f al r Parkway I I 50 feet ·------·,--" i 100 feet -----------J I J Culs-de-sac _______ __J I SO feet radius b. Rights-of-way are needed for future roadways in the opinion of the city. c. Right-of-way widths or add itional widths in existing rights-of-way in excess of the stand ards designated in this chapter when, du e to topography, ad d itional width i s necessary to provide adequate earth slopes. Suc h slopes shall not be in excess o f 3:1. (b) Railroads and limited-access roadways. Railroad rights-of-way and limited-access roadways where so located as to affect the subdivision of adjoining lands shall be t reated as follows: (1) In residential districts, a buffer stri p at least 25 feet in depth in addition to the normal depth of the lot required in the district shall be provided adjacent t o t he railroad right-of-way or limited-access roadway. (2) In districts zoned for business, co mmercia l or industrial uses, the nearest street extending parallel or approximately parallel to the railroad shall be at a sufficient di stance to ensure sui table depth for commercial or industrial sites. (3) Streets parallel to the rail road when inters ecting a street which crosses the rai lroad at grade shall be at a distance of at least 150 f ee t from the railroad right-of-way. Such distance sha ll be determined with du e co nsideration of the minimum di stance r equired for future se paration of grades by means of appropriate approach gra dients. (4) Streets crossi ng the rai lroads shall be avoided . (c) Intersections. (1) Streets shall be laid out so as to intersect as nearly as possible at right angles . A proposed int ersection of two new streets at an angle or less than 75 degree s sha ll not be acceptable. An ob lique stre et sho uld be curved approaching an intersection and shoul d be approximately at right angles for at least 10 0 feet from the intersection. Not more than two streets shall in ters ect at any one point un less specifical ly approved by the city. (2) Proposed new intersections along one sid e of an exist ing street shal l coincide with any existing interse ctions on the oppos ite side of such street. Intersection jogs with centerline offsets of less than 150 feet sha ll not be permitted, except where the intersected street has separated dual drives without median brea ks at either intersection. Where stree ts intersect major streets, their a lignme nt shall be continuous. Intersect ions of arteria l roadway s shall be at least 800 f eet apart. Pag e 5 I I (3) Minimum curb radius at the intersection of two local streets shall be at least 15 feet, and minimum curb radius at an intersection involving a collector street or local streets in a commercial or industrial area sha ll be at least 25 feet. Alley intersections and abrupt changes in alignment within a block shall have the corners cut off in accordance with standard engineering practice to permit safe vehicul ar movement. (4) Intersections shall be designed with a flat stopping area of at least 30 feet in a residential area and 60 feet in a comme rcial or industrial area. The stopping area shall be designed to provide a maximum grade of two percent. (5) Where any street intersection will involve earth banks or existing vegetation inside any lot corner that would create a traffic hazard by limiting visibi lity, the subdivider sha ll cut such ground and/or vegetation (including trees) in connection with the grading of the right- of-way to the extent deemed necessary by the city to provide an adequate sight distance. (6) The crown of all streets, including intersections, shall be three percent or less . (d) Typical section. The typical section indicated in this subsection is as determined for a clay subg rade (A-6 soil classification) and may be subject to change. Soil borings may be required to be determined by the city. Units (1) Private street, residential I R.O.W.* 1 (feet) ----i--- l M.P.W.** 1 (feet) Section 13-=-6 I Jover 7 I I 1so I I 15° i 124 --------,!,-8--i-n_c_h_c_la_s_s _5_1_00% crushe d 1-. 1 3-inch 2341 bituminous surface f2s l s-inch class 5 100% crushed I '3-inch 2341 bituminous surface _ _J I ____ ___J (2) Public street, residential -;;,W,;;----T !(fe~:___ _ ----, F -.- r3-=7o--· Isa Section ' ! J I I r ·--rso l 28 1 -inch class 5 100% crushed -i nch 2341 bitumi·n-ous surface ... ___ _J --------·----- 10v"10 ---- Maximum cul-de-sac length= 1,000 feet 32 I Maximum number of units on cul-de-sac= 10 (3) Public street, commercial or in dustrial f~rt~--~~·;·· ------·---~~~:~~:.:---·--- ! I ,-+ --p ·-132 _I -I *Right-of-Way Width **M inimum Paved Width 8-inch class 5 100% crushed 3-inch 2341 bituminous surface 1 s -inch class 4 1 8-inch class 5 100% crushed . 4-inch 2341 b ituminou s surface I (e) Horizontal and vertica l control. Horizo ntal and vertical contro l shall be as follows: Section I _J -·---1 i I ---•. , ... _________ __J I I Page 6 r-----·----·--·---~- I ~orizontal Control 1 Functional Design Vertical Control Maximum I Class ISpeed (mph) Private street (residential) I 'Minimum Gradient Radius I (percent) (feet) I ---------11,, 1275 I f 127-5~~~-~~~---1, j Public street 130 I I (residential) I I j Pu biic street 1 1 (commercial and industrial) 140 I 400 (Code 1984, § 11.33) Sec. 82-282. -Off-site premises; roadways. (a) Access to improved public or private roadways. No subdivision shall be approved unless the area to be subdivided shall have adequate access from an existing publicly dedicated and opened roadway or on a private roadway open to travel or vehicular use pursuant to an easement between persons or between persons and the city. Such roadway must be suitably improved as required by the city, the state or the county. If the public roadway, including but not limited to existing bridges, drainage structures, lighting, shoulders, base, pavement, alignment or sight distance, is not suitable to handle the proposed additional vehicular traffic from the subdivision, the subdivider at his expense will be responsible for first improving the public roa dway to a standard acceptable to the city, to ensure that the health, safety and welfare of the citizens presently using the roadway and in the future will be protected and will not be adversely affected by the increased use of the roadway caused by the subdivision. Th is improvement shall be accomplish ed prior to final subdivision approval unless the city agrees and the subdivider provides a suitable performance bond to complete the improvements in the subdivider's agreement. (b) Access to improved public roodwoys over existing private roadways. Wherever the area to be subd ivided is to utilize an existing private roadway in order to gain access to the public roadway, such private roadway shall be suitably improved as provided in this section for public roadways. (Code 1984, § 11.32(1)) Sec. 82-283. -On-site roadways. (a) Grading and improvement plan. Roadways shall be graded and improved to conform to the city's construction stan dard s and specifications and sha ll be approved as to design and specifications by the city engineer, in accordance with the construction plans required to be submitted prior to final subdivision approval. (b) Topography and arrangement. (1) Roadways shall be related appropriately to the topography. Roadways shall be curved wherever possible to avoid conformity of lot appearance . All roadways shall be arranged so as to obtain as many as possible of the building sites at or above the grades of the street. Grades of streets shall conform as clos ely as possible to the original topography. A comb ination of steep grades and curves shall be avoided . (2) All streets sha ll be properly integ rat ed with the existing and proposed system of thoroughfares and dedicated rights-of-way as established in the comprehensive municipal plan. (3) All thoroughfares shall be properly related to specific traffic generators, such as industries, business districts, schoo ls , churches , and shopping cente rs; to population den sities; and to the pattern of existing and proposed land uses. (4) Roadways shal l be lai d out to conform as much as possible to the topography, to discourage use by through traffic, to permit efficient drainage and utility systems, and to require the minimum number of roadways necessary to provide convenient and safe access to property. (5) The gridiron roadway pattern need not necessarily be adhered to, and the use of curvi lin ear roadways or U-shaped roadways shall be encouraged where such use will result in a more desirable la yo ut. Page 7 (6) Culs-de-sac shall be discouraged; proposed roadways shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be subdivided unless prevented by topography or other physical conditions or unless in the opinion of the city such extension is not necessary or desirable for the coordination of the layout of the subdivision with the existing layout or the most advantageous future development of adjacent tracts. (7) In business and industrial developments, the roadways and other accessways shall be planned in connection with the grouping of buildings, location of rail facilities, and the provisions of alleys, truck loading and maneuvering areas, and walks and parking areas so as to minimize conflict of movement between the various types of traffic, including pedestrian. (c) Blocks. (1) Blocks shall have sufficient width to provide for two tiers of lots of appropriate depths. Exceptions to this prescribed block width shall be permitted in blocks adjacent to arterial roadways, railroads or waterways. (2) The lengths, widths, and shapes of blocks shall be such as are appropriate for the locality and the type of development contemplated; but block lengths in residential areas shall not exceed 1,500 feet or 12 times the minimum lot width required in the zoning district, nor be less than 400 feet in length from centerline to centerline of adjacent streets. Wherever practicable, blocks along arterial collector roadways shall be not less than 1,000 feet in length. (3) In all blocks, the city shall require the reservation of an easement through the block to accommodate utilities, drainage facilities or pedestrian traffic. Pedestrian ways or crosswalks, not less than ten feet wide, may be required by the city through the center of blocks more than 800 feet long where deemed essential to provide circulation of access to schools, playgrounds, shopping centers, transportation or other community facilities. Blocks designed for industrial uses shall be of such length and width as may be determined suitable by the city for prospective use . (d) Access to primary arterials. Where a subdivision borders on or contains an existing or proposed arterial, the city may require that access to such roadways be limited by one of the following means: (1) The subdivision of lots so as to back onto the arterials and front onto a parallel local or collector roadway; no access shall be provided from the arterial, and screening shall be provided in a strip of land along the rear property line of such lots. (2) A series of culs -de-sac, U-shaped streets, or short loops entered from and designed generally at right angles to such a parallel street, with the rear lines of their terminal lots backing onto the arterial. (3) A marginal -access or service road separated from the arterial by a planting or grass strip and having access to the arterial at suitable po i nts. (e) Road names and street addresses. The sketch plan as submitted shall not indicate any names upon proposed streets. The city shall name all roads at the time of preliminary subd ivision approval and assign street addresses . The local postmaster shall be consulted by the zoning administrator. Names shall be sufficiently different in sound and in spelling from other road names in the area so as not to cause confusion. A road which is or is planned as a continuation of an existing road shall bear the same name. (f) Road regulatory signs. The subdivider shall deposit with the city at the time of final subdivision approval the sum of money as determined by the city for each road sign and the i nstallation cost. The city shall install all road signs before issuance of certificates of occupancy for any residence on the streets approved. The city shall place all signs at the developer's expense at all intersections within or abutting the subdivisio n, the type and location of which shall be approved by the city. (g) Reserve strips. The creation of reserve strips shall not be permitted adjacent to a proposed street in such a manner as to deny access from adjacent property to such street. (h) Construction of roads and dead-end roads. (1) Construction of roads. The arrangement of streets shall provide for the continuation of streets between adjacent properties when such continuation is necessary for convenient movement of traffic, effective fire protection, for efficient provision of utilities, and where such continuation is in accordance with the city comprehensive municipal plan . If the adjacent property is undeveloped and the street must be a dead-end street temporarily, the right-of-way shall be extended to the property line. The city may limit the length of temporary dead-end streets in accordance w ith this chapter. (2) Dead-end roads (permanent). Where a road does not extend to the boundary of the subdivision and its continuation is not required by the city for access to adjoining property, its terminus shall normally not be nearer to such boundary than 50 feet. However, the city may require the reservation of an appropriate easement to accommodate drainage facilities , pedestrian traffic or utilities. A cul -de -sac shall be provided at the end of a permanent dead-end street in accordance with the city's construction standards and specifications . For greater convenience to traffic and more effective police and fire protection, permanent dead-end streets shall, in general, be discouraged and where allowed be limited in length in accordance with this chapter. (Code 1984, § 11.32 (2 )) Sec . 82-284. -Road dedication and reservations. (a) New perimeter streets. Street systems in new subdivisions shall be laid out so as to eliminate or avoid new perimeter half-streets. Where an existing half-street is adjacent to a new subdiv ision, the other half of the street shall be improved and dedica ted by the subdivider. The city Page 8 may authorize a new perimeter street where the subdivider improves and dedicates the entire required street right-of-way width within his own subdivision boundaries. (b) Widening and realignment of existing roads . Where a subdivision borders an existing narrow road or when the comprehensive municipal plan or some other agency indicates plans for realignment or widening a road that would require use of some of the land in the subdivision, the subdivider shall be required to improve and dedicate at h is expense such areas for widening or realignment of such roads. Such frontage roads and streets shall be improved and dedicated by the subdivider at his own expense to the full width as required by this chapter. (c) Use of reserved land. Land reserved for any road purposes may not be counted in satisfying yard or area requirements of chapter 78, whether the land is to be dedicated to the city in fee simple or an easement is granted to the city. (Code 1984, § 11.40) Sec. 82-285. -Pedestrian access. The council may require sidewalks or other pedestrian pathways in order to facilitate pedestrian access from the roads to schools, parks, playgrounds or other nearby roads at least five feet in width . Sidewalks shall be five feet in width and pathways no more than eight feet in width. (Code 1984, § 11.44) Secs. 82-286-82-299. -Reserved. DIVISION 4. -CONSERVATION DESIGN Sec. 82 -300. -Conservation design required. All proposed residential subdivisions or multi-unit residential developments greater than five acres in total area or guided for urban density (greater than one unit per two acres) shall be subject to the provisions of chapter 78 , article XII with regards to conservation design. (Ord. No. 67 3rd series,§ 2, 1-11 -2010) Page 9 PC ExhibitW Outlot C, Bayview Farms znd Addition #13-3591 Summary Estimate of Fees* Preliminary Subdivision Plat Application: Preliminary Subdivision Application Proposed Private Road Proposed On-Site Evaluation -review charges Application Escrow {guarantees payment of City's consultant costs) Estimated cost of City Engineer's review of preliminary plat {Actual cost will be billed to property owner) Collected with Application Final Subdivision Plat Application: Final Subdivision Application, including Legal Review and Filing {w/ covenants) {Covers first review of documents, if additional time is required, those costs will be billed to the property owner.) Storm Water and Drainage Trunk Fee {paid for the entire plat) Park Fee {8% of Fair Market Value), but no less than $850 +$30/lot $650 + $0.50/lineal foot $60 per proposed lot $10,000 $7,500 $2,484.00 + $10,000 escrow $700 $3,840/acre ** $3,250/per lot and no more than $5,550 per lot x #of new lots $5,550/lot Estimated cost of City Engineer's review of final plat {Actual cost will be billed to property owner) $500.00 Final Subdivision Application Fee is paid with the Final Plat application. Storm Water and Drainage Trunk Fee, Park Fee and consultant costs are paid before the final plat is recorded. *Based on 2013 Fee Schedule ** Maximum Fee : For the 2-acre zoning districts, any lot exceeding 4.0 gross acres including wet land, shall be charged a maximum trunk fee equal to the trunk fee for a 4.0 acre parcel. ORDINANCE NO . ......22_, THIRD SERIES AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 2013 FEE SCHEDULE AND AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 91, THIRD SERIES The City Council of the City of Orono ordains: SECTION 1. Ordinances Repealed. Ordinance No. 91, Third Series, entitled 2012 Fee Schedule is hereby repealed. The City Council of Orono per Section 2-171 of the Municipal Code hereby ordains the following fees effective during the calendar year 2013: SECTION 2. Fees. ZONING APPLICATIONS All fees are application fees and are non-refundable after staff work has begun on the application. Applicants are responsible for all consultant charges incurred. Consultant charges will be billed separately. Application Type VARIANCE Base Fee (Additional variances included in base fee) Variance Extension (no change from original approval) $ 700.00 1 •1 Extension (Administrative approval} $ 50.00 2nd and each subsequent extension (Council approval) $ 350.00 After-the-Fact Fees Double Application Fee Application Escrow: New Home/Addition/New Structure $2,500.00 Other Variance $ 700.00 Exempt: Sign CUPNar; Guest Apt/Guest House CUP; Plbg in Accessory CUP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (One charge per project) Residential Accessory Use (Animals, etc.) Institutional Use (School, Church, etc.) Duplex Credit (per building) Guest House/Guest Apartment Commercial/Industrial Use Non-Conforming Use (Finding of Similar Use) Land Alteration: -Grading & filling -designated wetland/floodplain -Grading, filling, etc. (over 500 cubic yards) -Sea walls, retaining walls within 0-75' lakeshore Application Escrow (any of the above) Amend Existing CUP Renewal Conditional Use Permit (no change from original application) Conditional Use Permit with Variance (included in base CUP fee) After-the-Fact Fees $ 700.00 $ 700.00 $ 700.00 $ 700.00 $ 700.00 $ 700.00 $700.00 + permit $700.00 + permit $700.00 + permit $700.00 $700.00 $350.00 Double Application Fee Applicable Code Section Sec. 78-42; 78-96 thru 99; & Sec. 78-129 Res. #1306 Sec. 78-42 Sec. 78-42; 78-913 Sec. 78-42 Res. #1306 2013 Fee Schedule-Page I "'Cl () m )( ~ C" ;:. X ZONING APPLICATIONS (CONT.) Application Type PLANN E D DEVELOPMENT RPUD or PRD Application with Subdivision RPUD or PRO Application without Subdivision PID Applications (5 acre minimum per code) PUD Rezoning (Highway 12 Corridor Only): Residential Commercial/Industrial Application Escrow C OMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW Application Escrow ZONING AMENDMENTS INCLUDING R EZONING Escrow REQUEST TO AMEND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Escrow S UBDIVISION Sketch Pla n (C lass I, II, & III) Basic Subdivision Application (Class I & II Subdivisions, Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement) Preliminary Plat Review (Class III and all non-residential) Final Plat Review Renewal of Subdivision Approval (C lass I, II & HI, and Subdivision of a Lot L ine Rearrangement) (No Change from Original Approval) Application Escrow (All Class II and III S ubdivisions, and any C lass I S ubdivis ion or Lot Line Rearrangement that involves improvements subject to a Development Agreement) Subdivision Fee plus $35.00 per dwelling unit $ 50.00 per dwelling unit (minimum $600.00) $200.00 per acre (minimum $1 ,000.00) $700.00 + $40.00 per dwelling unit $200.00 per acre (min. $875.00) $10,000 minimum $700.00 + Consultant Fees $10 ,000 minimum $700.00 + Consultant Fees $700.00 $700.00 + Consultant Fees $700.00 $350.00 $700.00 Applicable Code Section Ch. 78, Article VI Sec. 78-42 S e c. 78-42 Sec. 78-42 Sec. 78-42 Sec. 78-42 Sec.82-85 Sec. 82-112 (a)(b), 82-15 $850.00 + $30.00/lot Sec. 82-112 (c) ($810/2 lots; $840/3 lots; $870/4 lots, etc.) $700.00 + Special Legal/Enginee ring/ C onsultant Charges Sec. 82-142 (9) $350.00 $2,500 m inimum-no public Sec. 78-42 and 82-47 improvements $10,000 minimum with public improvements 2013 Fee Schedule-Page 2 ZONING APPLICATIONS (CONT.) Application Type VACATIONS Public Road Easement Vacations with Subdivision Applications Easement Vacations not Associated with Subdivision Applications Escrow EASEMENT CREATION Easement Creation with Subdivision Application Easement Creation not Associated with Subdivision Application Escrow SPECIAL IMPROVEMENTS Non-refundable charges for City Engineer's review for applications and design drawing, including construction inspection fees . If improvements are proposed as part of a Subdivision, Review Charges are payable with Preliminary Plat application. Proposed Private Roads Proposed Public Roads Request for City to accept existing private road Request for City to maintain unimproved public road Proposed Sanitary Sewer Main Extension P r oposed Watermain Extension Proposed Storm Sewer System (excluding culverts) On-Site System -Site Evaluation Review (applicable to rural subdivision applications) APPEAL OF ADM I NISTRATIVE DECISION $100.00 per benefiting property ($700.00 minimum per application) $200.00 $700.00 + Consultant Fees $700.00 (no fee) $700.00 + Consultant Fees $700.00 $650.00 plus 50c/lineal foot $950.00 plus 50c/lineal foot $950.00 $225.00 $275.00 plus $25.00 per stub $275.00 plus $25.00 per stub $250.00 $ 60.00 per new lot proposed for on-site $ 50.00 Applicable Code Section Sec. 78-42 Sec. 78-42 Sec . 78-42 Sec. 82-15 (a)(3), 82-l 12(a) Sec. 82-213 (4) Sec. 78-99 20 I 3 Fee Schedule-Page 3 ZONING APPLICATIONS (CONT.) PARK DEDICATION FEES I Land Dedication Minimum Area -Subdividers shall be required to dedicate to the City for parks, playgrounds, trails, open spaces and other public purposes as a minimum that percentage of gross land area, or other such amount as may be determined by the City Council, as set forth below: (I) Residential/Agricultural/Multiple Residential Zoned Land. Dedication requirement of8% of the land being platted or subdivided. (Exclusive of lot that includes an existing residence.) (2) Commercial/Industrial Zoned Land. Dedicated requirement of8% of the land being platted or subdivided. Cash Contribution in Lieu of Lands. In those instances where a cash contribution is to be made by the subdivider, in lieu of a conveyance or dedication of land, the cash contribution to be contributed shall be equivalent to the fair market value of the equivalent undeveloped land that would otherwise have been conveyed or dedicated. The City shall account for such funds in a special fund named Park Dedication Funds. The City Council has established by resolution a minimum residential park fee of $3,250 per dwelling unit and a maximum of$5,550 per dwelling unit. The City Council has established by resolution a minimum commercial/industrial park fee of $8,125 per acre and a maximum of$13,875 per acre. Applicable Code Section Sec. 82-227 Res. 4738 (12-10-01) Res. 4739 (12-10-01) 20 13 Fee Schedule-Page 5 ZONING APPLICATIONS {C ONT.) STORM WATER A N D DRAINAGE TRUNK FEES Applicable C ode Section Sec. 14-281 t hru 14-287 S torm water trunk fees apply to new development and redevelopment of existing properties and provide f unding for the s to rm water infrastructure necessary to s e rv e the City. T he trunk fee is based on the land us e and ac reage of th e property be ing dev eloped. An equivalency factor multiplier is assigned to each land us e ty pe, wit h a 2-acre res idential lot considered as the standard in the City with an equ ivalency factor of 1.0. T he ta ble below lists the storm water trunk fees per acre for the variou s zo ning dis tricts and land uses in the C ity. s torm Water and D ra in age T runk Fees Ne w Dev elopment Trunk Fee/ (I) Buffer Easeme nt Reduct io n. Fo r th e 5-acre zo ning Land Use Acr e di strict, a re ductio n of up to 50% of th e trunk fee fo r the lot will be all owed for the pe rcentage of the lot protected by Sing le Fa mily Res identia l 5 Ac re Zon e (I) (2) $3 ,075 pe rimeter and/or dra inage way buffer c aseme nts. These buffe r easemen t areas shall rem ain in a nat ural con dit ion. Sing le Fam il y Re side nt ial 2 Acre Zone (3) $3,840 (2) Maxi mum Fee . Fo r th e 5-ac re zo ni ng dist rict, any lot Sing le Family Reside nt ia l I Acre Zone $5,000 ex ceedi ng 7.0 gross acres includ ing wetl an d, sha ll be charged a maxim um trunk fee equal to the tru nk fee for a 7.0 acre parcel. Such lot shall rem ain eligibl e fo r the up to 50% Sing le Fam il y Resident ia l 1/2 Acre Zo ne $5,76 5 reduction note d in (I) above, suc h reductio n based on the pe rcentage of 7.0 ac res th at is placed in bu ffe r eas em ents. Mul t i Fam i ly Residenti a l 4 Uni t s/Acre o r Less $6,93 0 (3) Max imu m Fee . For the 2-ac re zo ning distri cts, any Multi Family Resid e nt ial Greater tha n 4 Unit s/Acre $8,08 5 lo t exceed ing 4.0 gross ac res including wet land, shall be ch arge d a maxim um tru nk fe e equal to the tru nk fe e fo r a 4.0 C ommerci a l or In dust ria l $9,23 0 acre parce l. Redevelopment projects will be defined as any project to either remove and repla ce exis ting structu res or to e nlarge existing structures. T hese projects will be charged a portion of the bas e trunk fee a djus ted for th e area of expans ion of impe rvious s urface a bo ve th e e xis ting conditions. T he table below lists the base trunk fee based on the a rea of impervious surface expansion and adjusted for th e t ype of la nd use . The trunk fe e s hall be d etermined by multiplying th e appropriate fee by th e acrea ge of th e de velopme nt s ite. Area of Imp erviou s Surfac e Residential Red evelopm ent or Expan sion Commercial or Indu strial Expan s ion of Exi stin g Deve lopm ent Red eve lopm ent or Expan sion of Ex istin g Trunk Fee/Acre Devel opm e nt Trunk Fee/Acre 0 -1 000 Squa re Feet $1,350 $3 ,230 I 000-2000 Sq uare Feet $2,69 0 $6,46 0 More than 2000 Square Feet $3,78 0 $9,240 20 13 Fee Schedule-Page 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL · NO. 3 4 8 3 A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIM:INARY APPROVAL FOR A PLAT AT 4645/4665 BAYSIDE ROAD -FILE NO. 1967 PC ExhibitY WHEREAS, Robert S. Olson of 4645 Bayside Road, Irvin Geffre of 4665 Bayside Road and K-P Properties Inc . represented by Donald R. Peterson on August 26." 1994, filed a formal subdi vi sion application with the City for approval of a residential plat of property legally described as: · Lots 1 and 2, Bl~k 1, Bayview Farms, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the_ property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462 .358 et. seq . and the City of Orono's Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 19, 1994, at which time all persons de siring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicants subsequently revised their proposal which was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their regu lar meeting of October 17, 1994, at which time P lanning Commission on a vote of 7 to O recommended approval of the revised proposal; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on October 24, 1994, the Orono _City Council considered the subdivision application of Robert S. Olson, Irvin Geffre and K-P Properties Inc ., noting tl1e following findings of fact: 1. The property is located within the RR-lB, Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2. The property contains_ a total of approximately 19.5 acres, of which approximately 1.1 acres has been delineated as wetland. Page 1 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO . 8 4 8 3 3. The proposed p lat contains two lots ( designated as proposed Lot 1, Block 1 · and proposed Lot 1, Block 2), each containing an existing .residence structure, proposed Lot 1, Block 1 being 2 .75 ac~es in area, and proposed Lot 1, Block 2 being 1.94 acres in area. Proposed Lot 1, Block 2 technically requires a lot area variance, but will retain ownership of an additional 0.07 acre oullot and may gain up to· an additional 0 .28 acres as noted below, in order to meet the 2 .0 acre minimum lot area requirement. 4. The septic system serving the residence on proposed Lot 1, Block 1 is failing and is intended to be replaced . On-site sewage treatment system site evaluation da ta indicates that primary and alternate drainfield sites for current and future use are available within proposed Lot l, Block 1. No septic testing is required for the existing residence on proposed Lot 1, Block 2 since it is a pre-existing lot. 5. In addition to proposed Lot 1, Block 1 and proposed Lot 1, Block 2, four outlots are proposed to be created with the following intent for each : (a) (b) (c) (d) Outlot A: 0.28 acre remainder parcel to be combined with proposed Lot 1, Block 2, at such time that Outlots B and D are used for private driveway or road access to Outlot'C . Outlet B: 0.32 acre 50' future road corridor providing access for future development of Outlot C. In the event that Outlot C is further developed using road access from adjacent properties not requiring the use of Outlots B and D, Outlots A and B will be legally combined with proposed Lot 1, Block 1. Outlot C : 14 .13 acre parcel intended for future development into ·s ingle family residential lots. Outlet C is intended to not be buildable for even a single residence unless or until it is further subdivided and/or replatted into one or more building sites. Outlet D: 0 .07 acre future road corridor segment to complete continuous access · in conjunction with Outlot B for future development of Outlet C. In the event that Outlot C is further developed using road accesses from adjacent properties not requiring the use of Outlots B and D, Outlot D will be legally combined with the proposed Lot 1 , Block 2 . Page 2 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3 &. 8 3 6 . Outlets B and D provide continuous access to Outlet C from B~ys.ide Road . The platting of Outlot D coincides with an existing access easement over Lot 1, Block l, Bayview Farms in favor of Lot 2, Block 1, Bayview Farms . The inclusion of Lot 1, Block l, Bayview Farms in this proposed plat is the subject of an agreement attached to this resolution as. Exhibit A, which details the applicants' intent regarding the future use and disposition of Outlets A, B and D. 7. It is the City's intent that if Outlets B and D are developed for future road to serve Outlot C, then the existing residences on proposed Lot l, Block 1 and proposed Lot 1, Block 2 shall construct driveway accesses onto said new road and eliminate the existing direct driveway accesses to Bayside Road. · · 8. It is the City's intent that in the event Outlets Band Dare used in the future for road purposes that such road shall be constructed to City standards. Further, it is the City's intent that in order to guarantee the future access to Outlot C, applicants shall provide to the City standard road and utility easements over Outlots B and D. It is the City's further intent that if Outlot C . is developed without the need for access via Outlets B and D, that such road and utility easements will be vacated upon formal request of the property owners. 9. It is the City's intent that Outlets A, Band C shall remain in common ownershlp until Outlet C is further developed, and that Outlet D shall remain in common ownership with proposed Lot 1, Block 2 until Outlet C is further developed. . 10. It is the City's intent that at the time Outlot C is further developed, the City will at that time require the payment of park dedication fees and the dedication of all necessary and appropriate public easements within Outlets A, B, C and D. 11. It is the City's intent that proposed Lot 1, Block 1 and proposed Lot 1, Block 2 grant the standard perimeter utility and drainage easements based on the assumption that Outlots B and D will in the future become a roadway. 12. Alt!}ough Hennepin County Department of Public Works has requested additional right-of-way for County Road 84, no additional County road right-of-way will be required of the developer consistent with the standards for a collec.tor road in the Orono Comprehensive Plan. Page 3 of 6 · CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. :3 4 88 13 . A driveway easement over Outlot B shall be granted in favor of proposed Lot 1, Block 1 for the existing driveway in Outlot B. 14. The single family residences existing on proposed Lot 1, Block l nncl proposed Lot 1, Block 2 require no further variances. NOW, THEREFbRE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat for Robert S. Olson, Irvin Geffre and K-P Properties Inc. at 4645/4665 Bayside Road per the survey dated August 24, 1994, revised October 13, 1994, by Raymond A. Prasch of Lot Surveys Company Inc., subject to the following conditions : 1. Outlots A, B and C shall remain in conunon ownership until Outlot C is further developed . Outlot D shall remain in ownership with proposed Lot 1, Block 2 until Outlot C is further developed. 2. Outlot A is considered an unbuildable remainder parcel and upon development of Outlot C, Outlot A shall be either combined with Outlot Band proposed Lot 1, Block 1 if Outlots B and D are not used for road purposes, Qt Outlot A shall be legally combined with proposed Lot 1, Block 2, in the event that Outlots B and D are used for roadway purposes. · 3. Outlots B and D are platted for future roadway purposes and shall remain as separate unbuildable tax parcels until such time that Outlot C is further developed. In the event that Outlot C is further developed without a need for use of Outlots B and D as roadway access, then Outlots B and D must be legally combined with adjacent prope1ties . 4 . . Outlet C is created for future development only, and no building permits shall be issued for Outlot C until such time that it is replatted into one or more buildable lots . 5. In the event that Outlets B and D ·are used as an acces s road serving a future development in Outlot C, the residences on proposed Lot 1, Block 1 and proposed · Lot 1, Block 2 shall revise their driveway locations onto said Outlot roadway and eliminate direct access to Bayside Road. Page 4 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3 4 8 3 6. A driveway easement over Outlot B shall be granted in favor of proposed Lot 1, Block 1 for continued use of the existing driveway in Outlot B. 7. Proposed Lot 1, Block 1 and proposed Lot 1, Block 2 are subject to the standard perimeter drainage and utility easements. 8. No additional right-of-way for County Road 84 will be granted although Hennepin County has requested it. . . 9. Standard drainage and utility easements shall be granted over Outlots B and D at this time. However, the City will not require payment of park dedication fees or the dedication of additional public easements within Outlots A, B, C and D until Outlot C is further developed. 10. The residence on proposed Lot 1, Block 1 shall be provided with a new septic system within the time frame and requirements of the City code. 11. The metal shed located at the northwest corner of Outlot C shall be removed within one year of final plat approval unless a complete formal application for subdivision of Outlot C has been submitted by that date. TI1e following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the reg_ularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month: 1. Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) _mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200'. Drawing to include: A: Lot lines platted per preliminary _survey by Raymond A. Prasch of Lot Surveys Company Inc . dated August 25, revised October 13, 1994. B. Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" within proposed Lot 1, Block 1, such easements being 10' in width along all east and north lot lines, 10' in width along the westerly boundary adjacent to Outlet B, and 5' in width along the southwesterly and southerly lot lines; and within proposed Lot l, Block 2, such easements being 10' in width along the west and north lot lines , 5' in width along the easterly boundary, 10' in width along the boundary with Outlot D, and 5' in width alqng the southerly lot lines . Page 5 of 6 2. Legal documents required: CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 8 4 8 ~ A. Title opinion addressed to the City . All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shnlt sign the plnt and all other documents · affected by such interest. B. The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property . C . Signed and executed driveway easement over Outlot B in favor of . proposed Lot 1, Block 1. D . Signed and executed road and utility agreeme.nts over Outle ts B and D . 3. Fees to be paid: A. Legal review and filing fe e s = $200.00 Total due : $200.00 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minneso ta at a regular meeting held October 24 , 1994 . lin, City Clerk Edward J. Ca1la'1, Jr., Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing ins trument was acknowledged before me on this 24th day of October, 1994, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, May or & City Clerk of the City o f Orono, a Minnesota municipal corpo.ration and said instrument was executed on beha lf of the City. LINDA S. VEE NOTARY PUBL IC -MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY My com rr.lgslon expires S.12·96 . Notary Public Page 6 of 6 e.XHJBIT A ~L, No . ~L/93 AGREEMENT Robert S. 01:ion _and Margaret W . Olson, fee owners of Lot 2, Block 1, Bayview Farms , and K-P Properties, Inc., contract purchaser of said lot, hereby agr~e that in the event that portion of Lot 2, Block l , Bayview Farms shown as Outlot C on the attached Exhibit A 'is replatted into buildable parcels and a roadway 1s dedicated or reserved within that portion of Lot 2 , Block l, Bayview Farms which is shown as Outlot B on attached Exhibit A, then the above named parties hereby agree to deed to Irvin T. Geffre and Marjorie L. Geffre that portion of Lot 2, Block l, Bayview Farms . shown -as Outlet A on attached Exhibit A and a portion of Outlot C a:s shown on Exhibit A bounded by a line described as follows : Beginning at the Northwesterly corner of Lot 2, Block 1, Bayview farms which is also the Southwesterly comer of Lot l , Block 1, Bayview Farms ; thence North 89 45' 00" E distance 148 .50 feet, thence S 00 45". 00" E distance 103 .00 feet, thence S 89 45' 00" W di stance 148.50 feet, thence Northerly along the west line of Lot 2, Block 1, Bayview Farms to the point of beginning and there .. terminating . Irvin T. Geffre and Marjorie L. Geffre,· fee owners of Lot 1, Block l , Bayview Farms, as a consideration for such commitment to deed fu ture Outlot A and part of future Outlot C, hereby agree to join in the application for plat ting and any future plat of buildable pa.r_cels which proposes such dedication or reservation of Outlot B as access to Outlot C as shown on attached Exhibit A . __..----,~ay of Cx:.. i-: 1994. Robert S. Olson K -P .13¥: Donald R. Peterson ~/ Irvin T. Geffre Fee owners o f Lot 2. B lock 1 . Bayvi ew Farms Contract purchaser of Lot 2, Block 1, Bayview Farms Fee owners of Lot · 1. Block l ---~---. -~ ~ { , .. ~:;;!: Farms, their heirs Marjorie L~ -r-.,,...,_.._ ~ // . -. and ·' I. PRELIMINARY PL AT OF: BAYVIEW FARlvfS 2ND ADDITION CITY OF ORONO, CO UNTY OF HE NNEPIN --= ••• L---------:----------·----· 0 <{ 0 a:: LOT .. SURV EYS . co. LAND SURVEYORS· 0.-1-,.r: o..,,~ .. I. • P ,.....,.Utt I.e. U4l5 •ZW ..... Pl,-.ta. N HUI , __ : "··Sll1 fltillffl"! ... t.a\ff'Jia .. ,...,.u. ...... ~,- ... , ... u..r.s',6,J)t ,.._: •1•-on ~-~,,: 1.•t iw-wc •:a •• .,. .... ,in, ,:,,, '"'· •. 1r-:,,.,.vt".1'!"14'"·":1 ~: 1oS.•JC,l ,,_, ~t s. -,U...,,t,•1 11 . :h- '44S '4nf« ,_.. c:---. ~ tncrlnlur: \aL l. lie<' L !U'ff(S ;'f!lf'!'\ ,_,, "..._, ..... '""'I"'<' t,.,,,..._ .... ,,...., ... ._., h ,1.-r • ...._....,,.,.,,e 1. ,.,.,,,,. 4f.1S ht'II• JftM ..__ .. h'Xrlitt-1-: lel 1, llec.• I . I.U'fl0 ,,~ c-t, .,,.._.,., ,. • ..-,•u u .. ...,..u.,..-""_...· c.-..-.. 193 ....... '·---···'-'"'~ , ............. 0...-1 • .... .._ \. ....... , tn.a.uft: 0.t ..... 0,.:1 6C,l'H: °""" a •.>tac,u, Or,,,ne,1C 1•,1J Ac,u ~ ··---M'"4~ If APU~ ,l,,.C.10 0,0t AUUl i.,.,, ... ,., , , .... , ... : All .hl..c:,r1 .... ....,...••M t,,_. ,...,.:r>I '-~ ... u .. ,., .. , I ........ ArJJJfr-·(11',Al l"•- V•tc,r ~IJ •'°"l1 S....lt-,~•~IC ...... ~,,.,. ,-.,.., ....... ........... _. t'Nhle1'M h .~ .. ~· ... ,... .... ,,.. '1 .. .,.... ti'~.! ROAD :, .......... , . ........ u ~ ........ °'' 1 • ...... Q~ ~ .... ,.,. oun ' I i ' .; .I ('' '. CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 8 4 9 2 A ,RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF BAYVIEW FARMS SECOND ADDITION -FILE NO. 1967 PC Exhibit Z WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council bas considered the application for a subdivision by Robert S . Olson of 4645 Bayside Road, Irvin T. Geffre of 4665 Bayside Road, and K-P Properties, Inc. represented by Donald R. Peterson (hereinafter "the subdividers"); and WHEREAS , on October 24, 1994 , the City Council approved Resolution No. 3483 granting preliminary approval for a plat at 4645/4665 Bayside Road; and WHEREAS , the property is located within the RR-lB, Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land . within each newly created lot; and · WHEREAS, the property contains a total of approximately 19.5 acres, of which approxima.tely 1.1 acres has been delineated as wetland ; and WHEREAS, the proposed plat contains two lots (designated as proposed Lot 1, Block 1 and proposed Lot 1 , Block 2), each containing an existing residence structure , proposed Lot 1, Block 1 being 2.75 acres in area, and proposed Lot 1, Block 2 being 1.94 acres in area . Proposed Lot 1-, Block 2 technically requires a lot area variance, but will reta in ownership of an additional 0.07 acre outlot and may gain up to an additional 0 .28 acres as noted below , in order to meet the 2.0 acre minimum lot area requirement; and WHEREAS, the septic system serving the residence on proposed Lot 1, Block 1 is failing and is intended to be replaced . On-site sewage treatment system site evaluation data indicates that primary and alternate drainfield sites for current and future use are available within proposed Lot 1, Block 1. No septic testing is required for the existing residence on proposed Lot 1, Block 2 since it is a pre-existing lot; and Page 1 of 6 ,,,- CITY of ORONO RESOUITION OF THE CI1Y COUNCIL NO. 3 4 9 2 · WHEREAS, in addition to proposed Lot 1, Block 1 and proposed Lot 1, Block 2, four outlots are proposed to be created with the following intent for each: (a) Outlot A: 0 :28 acre remainder parcel to be combined with proposed Lot 1, Block 2, at such time that Outlots B and D are used for private driveway or road access to Outlot C. (b) Outlot B: 0.32 acre 50' future road corridor providing access for future development of Outlot C. In the event that Outlet C is further developed using road access from adjacent properties not requiring the use of Outlots B and D, Outlets A and B will be legally combined with proposed Lot 1, Block 1 . (c) Outlet C: 14.13 acre parcel intended for future development into single family residential lots . Outlot C is intended to not be buildable for even a single residence unless or until it is further subdivided and/or repianed into one or more building sites . (d) Outlot D: 0.07 acre future road corridor segment to complete continuous access in conjunction with Outlot B for future development of Outlot C. In the event that Outlot C is further developed using road accesses from adjacent properties not requiring the use of Outlots B and D, Outlet D will be legally combined with the proposed Lot 1, Block 2. WHEREAS, Outlets Band D provide continuous access to Outlet C from Bayside Road . The platting of Outlet D coincides with an existing access easement over Lot 1, Block 1, Bayview Farms in favor of Lot 2, Block 1, Bayview Farms. The inclusion of Lot l, Block 1, Bayview Farms in this proposed plat is the subject of an agreement attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, which details the applicants' intent regarding the future use and disposition of Outlets A, B and D; and WHEREAS, it is the City's intent that if Outlets B and D are developed for future road to serve Outlet C, then the existing residences on proposed Lot · 1, Block 1 and proposed Lot 1, Block 2 shall construct driveway accesses onto said new road and eliminate the existing direct driveway accesses to Bayside Road; and Page 2 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 8 4 .92 WHEREAS, it is the City's intent that in the event Outlots Band Dare used in the future for road purposes that such road shall be constructed to City standards . Further, it is the City's intent that in order to ·guarantee the future access to Outlet C, applicants shall provide to the City standard road and utility easements over Outlots Band D. It is the City's further intent that if Outlot C is developed without the need for access via Outlots B and D, that such road and utility easements will be vacated upon formal request of the property owners; and WHEREAS, it is the City's intent that Outlets A, B and C shall remain in private common ownership until Outlot C is further developed, and that Outlot D shall remain in private common ownership with proposed Lot 1, Block 2 until Outlot C is further developed; and WHEREAS, it is the City 's intent that at the ti.me Outlot C is further developed, the City will at that ·time require the payment of park dedication fees and the dedication of any ".additional ·necessary and .appropriate public easements within Outlets A, B, C and D; and . WHEREAS, it is the City's intent that proposed Lot 1, Block 1 and proposed Lot l , Block 2 grant the standard perimeter utility and drainage easements based on the assumption that Outlots B and D will in the future become a roadway; and WHEREAS, although Hennepin County Department . of Public Works has requested additional right-of-way for County Road 84, no additional County road right-of-way will be required of the developer consistent with the standards for a collector road as defined in the Orono Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, a driveway easement over Outlet B shall be granted in favor of proposed Lo t I , Block 1 for the existing driveway in Outlot B; and WHEREAS, the existing accessory metal shed located at the northwest comer of Outlot C will become non-conforming upon final plat approval due to lack of a principal residence structure and must be removed within one year of final plat approval unless it is incorporated into a subdivision of Outlot C into buildable lots and made conforming at that time; and WHEREAS, the single family residences existing on proposed Lot 1, Block 1 and proposed Lot 1, Block 2 require no further variances; and Page 3 of 6 .. __ j CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCil, NO. S 4 9 2 WHEREAS, the · subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1 . Completion of the requirements of Resolution No. 3483 . 2 . Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility easements . 3. Granting of road and utility easements over Outlets B and D. 4. Granting of a driveway easement over Outlot B in favor of proposed Lot 1, Block 1. 5 . Payment to the City of legal review and filing fees of $200.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Bayview Farms Second Additi on, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions : 1. 2. 3. 4. Outlets A , B and C shall remain in common ownership until Outlot C is further developed . Outlot D shall remain in ownership with proposed Lot 1, Block 2 until Outlot C is further developed. Outlot A is considered an unbuildable remainder parcel and upon development of Outlot C, Outlot A shall be either combined with Outlot B and proposed Lot 1, Block 1 if Outlets B and D are not used for road purposes, or Outlot A shall be legally combined with proposed Lot 1, Block 2, in the event that Outlets B and D are used for roadway purposes. Outlets B and D are platted for future roadway purposes and shall remain as separate unbuildable tax parcels in private ownership until such time that Outlot C is further developed . In the event that Outlot C is further developed without a need for use of Outlets Band Das roadway access, then Outlets Band D must be legally combined with adjacent properties. Outlot C is created for future development only , and no building permits shall be issued for Outlot C until such time that it is replatted into one or more buildable lots . Page 4 of 6 Fn!OOIIIIIIIO.., CITY of ORONO . RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3492 5. In the event that Outlots B and D are used as .an access road serving a future development in Outlot C, the residences on proposed Lot 1, Block 1 and proposed Lot 1, Block 2 shall revise their driveway locations onto said Outlot roadway and eliminate direct access to Bayside Road. 6. No additional right-of-way for County Road 84 will be granted although Hermepin County has requested it. 7. Payment of park dedication fees and the dedication of additional public easements within Outlots A, B, C and D will not be required until Outlot C is further developed. 8 . The residence on proposed Lot 1, Block 1 shall be provided with a new septic system within the time frame and requirements of the City code. 9. The metal shed located at the northwest corner of Outlot C shall be removed within one year of final plat approval unless a complete· formal application for subdivision of Outlet C has been submitted by that date. 10. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hermepin County Recorder's Office on or before May 14, 1995 together with a certified original copy of this resolution and executed copies of the easement documents noted above. The approval granted by this resolution shall expire if the plat has not been fiJed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Page 5 of 6 .J CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO . 8 4 9 2 Dated this 14th day of November, 1994. ST A TE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss . COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 14th day of November, 1994, by Edward J. Callahan, J_r. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. ·£,!·~ LINDA S. VBB .-"''\'' NOTll l-W PUBLIC • MINNESOTA ~~'Ii'°:::'.'.·:.. ~i EM NEPIN COUNTY. ' -· .•. ,1· '• .,., "r,rnr,,l,is~n &ltplreo 6-12 96 ~-· . •·1 ... .. ~ •. ~-,.~~ .... ., • ...;.-.,~, ... , 9~ Notary Public Page 6 of 6 ·~"' ·.,··· ··., .r·· ( · ErH-1B1, A ~so~. :JI= 3'i9:J. AGREEMENT Robert S. Olson and Margaret W. Olson, fee owners of Lot 2, Block l, Bayview Farms, and K-P Properties, Inc., contract purchaser of said lot, hereby . agree that in the event that portion of Lot 2, Block l, Bayview Farms shown as Outlot C on the attached Exhibit A is replatted into buildable parcels and a roadway is dedicated or reserved within that portion of Lot 2, Block 1, Bayview Farms which is shown as Outlot B on attached E;thibit A, then the above named parties hereby agree to deed to Irvin T. Geffre and Marjorie L. Geffre that portion of Lot 2, Block l, Bayview Farms shown as Outlot A on attached Exhibit A and a portion of Oullot C as shown on Exhibit A bounded by a line described as follows: Beginning at the Northwesterly· corner of Lot 2, Block 1, Bayview farms which is also the Southwesterly corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Bayview Farms; thence North 89 45' 00" E distance 148.50 feet, thence S 00 . 45" 00" E· distance 103.00 feet, thence S 89 45' 00" W distance 148.50 feet, thence. Northerly ¥Dg the west line of Lot 2, Block 1, Bayview Farms to the point of beginning. and there terminating. Irvin T . Geffre and Marjorie L. Geffre, fee owners of Lot 1, Block l, Bayview Farms, as a consideration for such commitment to deed future Oullot . A and part of future Outlol C, hereby agree lo join in the application for platting and any future plat of buildable parcels which proposes such dedication or reservation of Outlot B as access to Outlot C as shown on attached Eithibit A . . /1 -K-P ;:cz-Inc ~. J3.y : . '-~X7~ lf:@;,,fJ':/ president Donald R . Peterson \ ' {*-· ~---.._:_ ---- Irvin T . Geffre Fee owners of Lot 2 , Block 1 BayYiew Farms . Contract purchaser of Lot 2, Block l, Bayview Farms Fee o,,..·oers of L ot 1, Block 1 <AA/\ ' ' ~ayYiew Farms, their heirs ___ 7 .J!.;_'::::=...~..L~ --1::-.!.~ I . s s i g n s .Marj one L. q!ffrc /_.,. .. and \. PRELIMINARY PL AT OF; BA YVIEvV F ARlvfS 2ND ADDITION CITY OF ORONO, COUN TY OF HENNEPIN LOT. SUR VEYS CO- LAND SURVEYORS ..,...l 4"M'I": -·-'., ,,.........dtt '""· uo, ..... .t ••• 11:i--t•. ,. ... 1'441 ,,._: •1 .. CU 1 .. , ....... : O...•n- »&.11~~=:a,,.1- 'hrNc... 0 S~'Jll t'Mrllc: •U•llll .. .,._..,.~ l•t • ..,.-1, A .• I -". /kl :'lrs •..-. ,. ~:~ .. ,-.... ,, ... -:: ~-!O·r.,J ..... , ~ !.. _.. l*~-..... , .•• ··,-·"" s..,i..-'-!:"-. .... WC. l . tie<• l. ~~1:v r ..,,...; ~tr•'--•• ..... t-r• :a .. ~.,,,,,.,.. • ..... , 1, .. 1,. r. --"""~, ...... ,~ .. ... ~ -tJi,1:• .. a:-., 0,,-.f,t 0r..u:r.,11 .. : ln I , • ._. I ... ,,tt,, f•~ . c-~ .,,..._ __ :,,, -.'-• ... ~ ... ,.-...i:-. i. ... ...._,,, ... .. T ..... ,__..,~ .. 1 r., __ .,o,,,_ .. 1..:, • .-., in .......... : e,..,-·~ ... ~ .. . o..i-• OU: A""o• o..,-c. l "•)•.tu !••-•• IIH.-.ll•H••: ->--~ OQ# ec.,tll ......... t ., ....... : .. ,, ..... ~..,... ·~-·-•, ..... ,_...,..' '-~...._-,,,.., ,., .. , ............ ,.~,, i.-,,_ ,._. ~t.1( TYPICAL L-OT ROAD ; .............. . .., ... , ...... . .._ ..... ,._. •MI04 tH l1 ,_, ., -. 'l t.!)'::!.! , • ..-.. ... r, ia,.....,, ••• ·- -.. -... i . ,_ .... .,. ... : •-••# (o•• i I _I LOT5: Total Lot Area= 94,089 sf (2 .16 ac) Pond Area = 1,958 sf (0.04 ac) Wetland Area = 0 sf DryArea=92,131 sf(2.12ac) LOT4: Total Lot Area= 94 ,7 95 sf (2.18 ac) Pond Area = 6,483 sf (0.15 ac) Wetland Area = 0 sf Dry Area= 88,312 sf (2.03 ac) LOT3: Pd-1,958 sf Total Lot Area"' 114,401 sf (2.63 ac) Pond Area = 0 sf Wetland Area = O sf Dry Area= 114,401 sf (2.63 ac) LOT 1: Total Lot Area: 151,711 sf(3.48ac) Pond Area : O sf Wetland Area= 30 ,189 sf (0.69 ac) Dry Area "' 121,522 sf (2.79 ac) Wet-30,189 sf Wet-393 sf LOT2: Tot al Lot Area= 98 ,631 sf (2.26 ac) Po nd Area "' 0 sf Wetland Area = 393 sf (0.009 ac) Dry Area = 98,238 sf (2 .2 5 ac) RECEIVED FEB 1 2 2013 CITY OF ORONO -0 (") m )( ::r cr ;:;: I I I I I I I I vi WI LoJ ~, (!) I ~, LoJ !~ I I I I I I I I I I I - I I I en,, < 0 c:::: w Q u:i >-< O:),_ -.::t" 00 0 z Q < 0 ~ >-f- 5 0 ~ J ' I OS ' I I I I OWNER: PETER & SHARON RENNEBOHM PID#-0611723210005 OWNER: I I I •~ lo .&& Iii ,-~~ I I ~ ._ I ~~/ I I I • I I It;;+ !!~ ~ "'!! ~~ + ~ t~;. :; + + + + y + + + + + i .... ->._ ,,. + + + ~ + ,, ) + t + + + + + + + + OcOO OWNER: 0 ' I I I I \ 3015 0 I I JAMES MORGAN & DEBRA PULFORD PID#-0611723220022 JAMES & JULIE DZUBA Y PIDN-0611723220023 DESIGN DATA: STREET SECTIO N: 1.5" SPWEB240B WEAR COURSE (MN OOT 2360) 2.5· SPNWB230B BASE COURSE (MN OOT 2360) 8" CL 5 AGGREGATE BASE (MN DOT 3138) SUBGRAOE FABRIC (8 OZJSY. NON-WOVEN) (if requlreo) s· (2" wide) CL 7 AGGREGATE SHOULDER CROSS SECTION: 3'1/oCROWN 10' PAVEMENT WIDTH 2' AGGREGATE SHOULDER 3: 1 DITCH SLOPE 2' TYPICAL OtTCH DEPTH 3' TYPICAL DITCH WIDTH INSTALL CULVERTS FOR EACH DRIVEWAY WITH HOME CONSTRUCTION SITE DATA: ZONING : RR-1B MIN LOT AREA: 2.0 AC MIN LOT W IDTH: 200 FT FYSB • 50 FT SYSB-30FT SYSB STRT. 50 FT RYSB-50FT •• MAX COS LENGTH · 1000 FT • •• MIN CURVE 275 FT 50 _ _c.D:::.ES'-IGc...N;.::;E"-R-+'-N;.::;0:..... +--"B-'-Y-+-...:O;;..;A"-'TE=-l-----'-R:::.EV:.;;IS:.;;IO:.;.Nc:;S ____ --1 USE (INCLUD ING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION , ANO/OR CONVEYANCE OF RSM RSM 02-11-13 Loe~~~.,... ll'FORMATION) OF THIS PROOUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITEO WITHOUT DRAWN BY RSM C HECK ED BY lOO( DATE 01 -15-13 SATHRE-8ERGOUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITIEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATIO N CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE ANO S HALL TH EREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-8ERGQUIST, INC. Of ALL RESPONSIBl.lTY. SATHRE-8ERGOUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY llLEGITIMATE -U SER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPON SIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEG IT MATE USE. 25 25 50 SCALE IN FE ET 100 OWNER: AMERICAN HOME MORTGAG E PIDN-0611723220021 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY M E OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANO lliAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIO NAL ENGINEER UNDER TH E LAWS OF THE S TA TE OF M INN ESOTA. Robert S. ~£l~, P .E. Oa1e: 0( /tdfJ. Lie. No. Jd.'<Y SATHRE-BERG QUI ST , IN C . 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 OWNER: BRADL EY PASS PID#-0611723240001 PC Exhibit BB jo.o 1 / / / / (" ...... I \ I \ \ \ I _-l ,00 I I L-- lo IS! _______ _J o·os r -- __ .., r --oo -1.. ..J ·-.. --.. , ~ :}1~.1c :. J L --"go'/'\ '1,1 // \-?.I / / • /,"'.> > < ~~'i;./ / \ y;;,-/ I "?.\ //'1,1 I v I I u: I <:T 0 I (") en < 0 ...... 0 M 0 I 0 .....i ~ o·os ~ 8 r -- BF 994.6 r ----..-----__J ol g _ ,v"\ ~ OWNER : ERIN SULLIVAN PIDN-0611723220024 c;PO O 00 0 C w ~ w () w a:: (/) (/) < Cl. -j aiN ~8 I") VlN "(/)I") O::<(N wCl.,.._ i\.,:: Oz'° 00 ~J.. Vl9 ::;;Cl. a:: < < c.i ...J ...J ~ O> 1--5 <o _,,., UN ··-,,., [!J~N i"'" Cl.:: o~:g >-I w"" a::9 u..Cl. u.. L,J --, SHEET INDEX TABLE DEVELOPER. ERVIN W ACHMAN 2 135 Salem Cou~ Long Lake, M innesota 55365 PROJECT CONSULT AN' WILLIAM COFFMAN I I I I Sheet SP EX AA pp I D escr iption I Preliminary Site Pla n I Existina Conditions Plan I Alta Survev I Preliminary Plat 0 (""") z c:, 0 C'-.J a:'. 0-J 0 .--u.. CD 0 u..J ~ ~ (.) I I I I Coffman Dt\·clopmcnt Ser.. ices. Inc. Cellular 612-202-06Q2 Ema1 l:billcofTmao@c;bbumct.com I GP I Preliminarv Gradina & Erosion C ontrol Plan I I CITY PROJECT NO. ORONO, MINNESOTA I I I ST I Preliminary Street Plan & Profile LS I Land scaoina Plans A!;lrisil I A!ilds!I -SQQ' Setbs1~k Plsin PRELIMINARY S ITE PLAN BAYSIDE MEADOWS I I FILE NO . 3 1202-070 SP SP 2-s700Zl,. PC Exhibit CC ,~ fl.Oi4b i 1A,1'1(.,1T"1 e-A.1~.,. ov~ DM~ D, "f"D c t'rY Bct rs,~ ' ~ ~ ().V11,,t'f""/ (;k(?M.gN"t DV~dJu.7"l.Cr 8 7() Cc'M t3Y I ()t,-t~ Co/'05<:::Nr vo A Lk' 'I wr -B-1 ~ &l,,i\J~ 1200 ... .... .... 800 1800 I 1100 -··-l-....- -......... .. j • I _ WEST~ ROAD __ _ 1200 -~ ., I ••....._ I " ... ··--~ ---1- , .. , , I'--, , .. ....... , ... - 2000 - 2100 • ~ ,_) -----ru~ ..... 10 I uu 2800 --~ " I 3200 -. .... -· I 1000 t · 3200 2800 WA'flATABl.,VO i • T.H.12 ... ---l .. _ • B.N.S.R. .. _,. \. ....... _ ----~~--- : I r······-1 2000 I , ... I 1200 I ... .... 0 I I ------·-··-··-··--1200 .uuu,,,il · 1···....... ! : .... -·--···· ···-·····-•,·-- Dll:"J.J-1'1" I •• Ula! • ,. ' ---. ----• • u••· _ _...I ,.,.u l -eoo ... ... •• -··-I I.A/l;I LUVG L,o:r --100 .. ' I • I ---,-,-... ...... , .. , , () -... .. • I .... .. • I ' 'AFA.lll7f I ~~ I ... ,_ , -,--, ro w,4 HAY ---I l I 2800 2100 1 - G f _J-1200 , __ J_ 1600 ,_ 2000 __J-2100 10 -i-2800 , ll -f I I 2000 H 1600 1200 800 , -)200 .... 0 Compreh ensive Trail Sy stem Pl an City of Orono Minnesota /'V Existing Separated Trai ls Future Trail s (May Be Road Shoulder or Separa ted) 0 3000 6000 --s Scale in feet #Bonestroo MAP 4 E-3 0 0 o 203 Feet ---======i © Bolton & Menk, Inc -Web GIS 2/13/2013 12 :54 PM Legend Contours Index Intermediate Rai lroad a City Li mits D Parcels (1-1-201 3) Cristifori Circle Discbiimer: This drawing is neithM a leg alfy record ed map nor a survey an d is not int ended to be used as one. Th is drawing ls a com pilat ion of rH:ords, information, an d data located in va rious city, county, and state offices, and othe r sources affectin e the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City of Orono is not r,.<.oon<.ihlP. fnr ar,v inarr11r::1rW-<. h,..r,.in r n ntainl"rl ,:, ('") m >< =. O" ;::.: m m RUN DATE: 1/11/2013 38 06-117-23 21 0005 P & S RENN EB OHM 4565 BAYSIDE RD PETER& SHARON RENNEBO HM 4565 BAYSIDE ROAD MA PLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-117-23 22 0012 ERVIN A WACHMAN JR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED CITY OF ORONO PO BOX66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 06-117-23 22 0018 ERV IN A WACHMAN JR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ERVIN A WACHMAN JR 2135 SALEM CT LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 06-117-23 22 0021 RES! WHOLE LOAN II LLC 4755 BAYSIDE RD AMERJCAN HOME MTG SERV IN C 4875 BELFORT RD SUITE 130 JACKSONVILLE FL 32256 38 06-11 7-23 22 0024 ERJN SULLIVAN I 80 NORTH SHORE DR W ERJN SULLIVAN 180 NORTH SHORE DR W MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-117-23 23 0019 J P TH UL L & P E THULL 270 NORTH SHORE DR W JEF FREY P THULL PATRICIA E THULL 210 NORT H SHORE DR W MO UND MN 55364 38 31-118-23330005 B & NCUFF 4660 BAYSIDE RD BRIDGETTE CUFF 4660 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PL AIN MN 55359 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PC Exhibit FF 38 06-11 7-23 22 0009 ERIC P SIMS/ELIZABETH I SIMS 4645 BAYSIDE RD ERIC P SIMS/ELIZABETH I SIMS 4645 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-117-23 22 0014 ERVIN A WACHMAN JR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED CITY OF ORONO POBOX66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 06-117 -23 22 0019 EVAN R MELINE 4775 BAYSIDE RD EVAN R MELIN E 4775 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-117-23 22 0022 J W MORGAN JR & D G PUL FORD 4725 BAYS IDE RD JAMES MORGAN & DEBRA PULFORD 4725 BAYSIDE RD MAP LE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-117-23 220025 J MORGAN & D PULFORD ET AL 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED JAMES MORGAN & DEBRA PULFORD 4725 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-117-23 23 0021 CA ARM STRONG PASS/BJ PASS 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED BRADLEY J PASS 253 6 18TH AVES MPLS MN 55404 38 3 1-118-23 33 0007 ROSEMARY C IVERSEN 4740 BAYSIDE RD ROSEMARY C IV ERSEN 2835 CASCO PO INT RD WAYZATA MN 553915359 59 38 06-117-23 22 0011 IT & ML GEFFRE 38ADD RESS UNASS IGNED IRVIN T & MARJORIE L GEF FRE 4665 BAYSIDE RD MA PLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06 -11 7-23 22 0017 IT & M LGEFFRE 4665 BAYSIDE RD IRVIN & MARJORIE GEFFRE 4665 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-11 7-23 22 0020 PETE R MEYERS/CAROLYN MEYERS 70 NORTI-1 SHORE DR W PETER MEYERS CAROLYN MEYERS PO BOX 157 MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-117-23 22 0023 SD& J A DZUBAY l5 0NORTH SHORE DR W STEVEN D & JULIEA DZUBAY 150 NORTH SHORE DR W MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-11 7-23 23 0018 J P THULL & P E THULL 2 10 NORTH SHORE DR W JEFFREY P THULL PATRJCIA E THULL 210 NORTH SHORE DR W MOUND MN 55364 38 06-117-23240001 BRAD LEY J PASS 2 15 NORTH ARM LA BRADL EY PASS 2536 18TH AVES MP LS MN 55404 38 31-1 18-23330009 PAINTERS CREEK HOMEOWNERS 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED PAINTERS CREE K HOMEOWNERS C/0 SHAi'\fNON BURGER 165 LUCE LI NE RJ DGE ORONO MN 55359 RECEIVED JAN 2 3 2013 CITY OF ORONO RUN DATE: 1111 /2013 38 31-118-23330011 B R LANGE & J B BURRELL 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED BRUCE R LANGE P OBOX48 NEWKENT VA 23124 38 31-118-23 340003 JOHN R HENDRICKSON ET AL 25 LUCE LINE RIDGE JOHN R HENDRICKSON 25 LUCE LINE RIDGE MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE DATE: .!.'W ·, 1 ·inn HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 38 31 -118-23 33 0014 MICHAEL D SLETTEN 4680 BAYSIDE RD MICHAEL D SLEITEN 4680 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 DEPARTMEN T. 59 38 31-118-23 33 0015 B PETER & CHRISTINE A CHEY 4720 BAYSID E RD B PETER & C HRJSTINE ACHEY 4720 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 RECEIVED JAN.-2 3 2013 CITY OF ORONO 31-118.·2~33.~--+----f " CS) 11 01-117-2~11 06-111 23-22 11) 01-117-24-14 06-117-2~ -------- '11 06-117-23-24 PC Exhibit GG " i __ _J, g)-1' I I i: I! For more information contact: Print Date: 1/11/2013 Hennepin County GIS Division Map Letend : 300 South 6th Street Map Scale: 1" = 389' Minneapolis, MN 55487 Buffer Size: 350 feet gis. info@co. he nnepi n . mn. us Map Comments: 4645 -46 65 BAYSI DE RD ORONO ,M N Water Park Parcel D Buffer Retion Selected Parcels Major Roads I ii Minor Roads !1 ti " II .,~~' ,1 ,r, ,I ii I I ii 'I RECEIVE D JAN 2 3 2013 Cttv OF ORONO ... 1/11 /2013 February 14, 2013 Melanie Curtis City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RE: Land Use Proposition #13-3591 Dear Melanie : RECEIVED FEB . 4 2013 CJry OF ORONO PC Exhibit HH I am writing with some concerns regarding Land Use Proposition #13-3591. This proposition is in regards to connecting my existing driveway at 4665 Bayside Rd with the proposed new private roadway to the Wachman Parcel. I am opposed to connecting my driveway to the proposed private roadway for the following reasons: 1) The new driveway would require much more maintenance and upkeep as it would be approximately 100 feet longer. 2) The new driveway would come ve ry close to my drain field. It also, would create a useless strip of land between the driveway and County Road 84. 3) We do not want to be responsible for any future repairs, maintenance or upgrading of the proposed private road. I would appreciate your consideration in allowing u s to keep our existing driveway as it is. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ca ll me at 6 12-599-6393. Thank you. Sincerely, ~A~-1--~+ Irv in Geffr e 4665 Bayside Rd Maple Plain, MN 55359 Melanie Curtis From: Sent: To: Melanie Curtis Monday , February 25, 2013 11 :53 AM 'Coffman , William D' Council Exhibit G Cc: 'Bob Molstad'; 'melissa@kjolhaugenv.com'; 'shellwachm@msn .com'; 'Robert Bean'; David P. Martini Subject: 13-3591 PC Action Notice Bill As you are aware, the Orono Planning Commission reviewied your application for preliminary plat of Outlot C Bayside Meadows (File #13-3591) on Tuesday, February 19th. The Planning Commission acknowledged your recently revised plans and, with conditions, recommend approval of the preliminary plat. The approval conditions are as follows: 1. Revise the landscape plan to include additional, similar native trees to be planted along the entire southern property boundary showing a tree preservation easement. 2. Revise the landscape plan to reflect removal of invasive species as identified within the KES conservation design report. 3. Address on-going maintenance and removal of invasive species within the HOA documents. 4. Only the variance for the cul-de-sac length was acceptable. All other code requirements must be met with revised plans. 5. Geffre curb cut to be addressed, if needed, by Hennepin County. 6 . The revised plans should reflect a trail easement 10 feet in width abutting Bayside Road. Complete sets of the revised plans and/or information are requried to be submitted to the City for review by or before February 28th at noon in order for con sideration on the City Council's March 11 th meeting. Two full-sized sets of complete, revised plans and one copy of a reduced full set 11x 17 or smaller is required. Digital copies may replace the reduced set. Please let me know if you have any questions. Melanie Melanie Curtis Planning & Zoning Co ordinator City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Direct Dial: 952.249.4627 Fa x: 952.249.4616 Planni ng & Zoning Office 952.249.4620 Email: mcurti s@c i.oro no.mn.us Website: www.ci.orono.m n .us City of Orono Office H ours Mond ay -Fri day 8:00 am -4 :30 pm 1 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. Council Exhibit H hoenzeit noted this is a difficult lot to work with and has a number of practical difficulties. Schoenzeit sta d in his mind further mitigation will be difficult to request. Land gr er noted the City Council discussed the prior failure of the bluff. Curtis note is property as well as the adjoining property experience.d a bluff failure o occasions. Th ailure on the adjacent property occurred approximately three years a . Landgraver noted t eighbor stated at the Council meeting that there were a and other debris under e soil that contributed to the failure. Leskinen indicated it is her derstanding that subterranean walls wer onstructed to fix the failure on this property and are still in p Curtis indicated that is correct. Lemke asked if Staff is aware of where Curtis indicated they are approximately in the location. nmission had not discussed before and that he ent on this application before it was Schoenzeit noted the City Council brought back to the City Counci1 t that it probably is ready for e Planning Commission to comment on. Curtis indicated the ding plan as proposed is consistent with the City's reqm ents to maintain drainage to the la or to the road on to the applicant's property. In this case the r ff is diverted to the lake . Curtis in · ated there are ways to capture it and treat it or slow it down but that easures given the topography of the lot. Landgr er moved, Leskinen seconded, to recommend approval of Application #12-3582, olson Cust Homes on Behalf of BWB Holdings, 4731 North Shore Drive, granting of variances, bject to e conditions of the City Engineer and the Department of Natural Resources. VOTE : Ayes ys 0. NEW BUSINESS 3. #13-3591 ERVIN WACHMAN, OUTLOT C, BAYVIEW FARMS 2ND ADDITION (PID 06-117-23-22-0018), PRELIMINARY PLAT/SUBDIVISION, 6:45 P.M. -7:22 P.M. Ervin Wachman, Applicant; Bill Coffman, Coffman Development; Robert Molstad, Satre-Bergquist; Mark Kjulhaug; and Eric Sims, 4645 Bayside Road , were present. Page 3 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. Curtis stated the applicant is requesting preliminary plat review in order to create five new, 2-plus acre buildable lots and a private road from the original 13-plus acres. All of the lots would be served by a new private road with a cul-de-sac extending southerly from Bayside Road. All lots would also be served by private septic systems and private wells. The proposed subdivision is in conformity with the guiding of this area for single-family rural residential development at a maximum density of one unit per two acres. The proposed development also generally conforms to the standards of the RR-I B Zoning District. Curtis noted tonight's presentation will be based on the original plans submitted with the application. The applicant has submitted revised plans but Staff and the City Engineer have not had an opportunity to review those revised plans . Copies of the revised plans have been provided to the Planning Commission tonight in the event the applicant would like to refer to the proposed changes to the original plan. The site to be platted as "Bayside Meadows" is currently a vacant field containing open areas identified as a hayfield and meadow, a wetland, and a wooded area along the south and southeast portions of the property. A wetland delineation has been conducted and has been shown on the survey. The wetland has been reclassified from a Preserve classification to a Manage2 classification. The City has received a copy of the delineation and of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval of the delineation and the reclassification. A storm water pond is proposed to be created to address stormwater resulting from the new hardcover of the development. The storm water pond will straddle the common lot line between proposed Lots 4 and 5 with outlet pipes directing overflow water under the proposed private road into the ditch and wetland on the east side. The area taken up by the storm water pond has been deducted from the dry buildable acreage of each lot. Bayview Farms and Bayview Farms 2°d Addition were plated in preparation for allowing the current Outlot C to be developed with additional building sites. T he future driveway relocation was a condition of the plat approval. Agreements detailing the driveway relocation requirement are part of the approval resolutions for Bayview Farms 2"d Addition. An additional new outlot, shown as proposed Outlot A , will be platted for the purposes of constructing the private road with cul-de-sac and connecting to Bayside Road. Hennepin County has provided comments on this proposed plan which support the past understanding regarding the driveway relocation for both the adjoining properties. The current plan reflects a connection of the Sims driveway to the new private road. The Geffre driveway is not proposed to be relocated. The property is situated south of Bayside road otherwise known as County State Aid Highway 84 and is accessed via a platted 50-foot corridor between the Geffre and Sims properties. The applicant is proposing the following lots under the previously submitted plans: 1. Lot I is proposed to contain 3.48 acres total; 2.79 acres dry, buildable and 0.69 acres wetland. This lot is proposed to be the largest overall with a total of 3 .48 acres, but the proposed tree and conservation easements, wetland, wetland buffer, buffer setback, and the proposed road location result in limited options for building sites. This lot is proposed to have 784-plus feet of frontage along the private road. Most of the site's Manage 2 wetland is situated on this lot centrally along the eastern side. There is a sufficient buildable envelope available and all of the required RR-I B district lot line setbacks can be met. Page 4 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. 2. Lot 2 is proposed to contained 2.26 acres total; 2.25 acres dry, buildable and 0.009 acre wetland. Lot 2 has 92-plus feet in width at the cul-de-sac and 180-plus feet in width at the principal building setback and contains 2.25-plus dry acres in area. There is a very small portion of the manage 2 wetland on the northeast corner of the property; a 30-foot wetland buffer is shown surrounding the wetland. Tree preservation easements are proposed on the eastern half of the property as well as a portion across the southern lot line of the property to protect and preserve the existing tree stand. Al required RR-1 B setbacks can reasonably be met when this lot is developed with a new home. The septic treatment sites are located out of the tree preservation area. 3. Lot 3 is proposed to contain 2.63 acres total dry, buildable area. It is proposed to have 110-plus feet in width at the cul-de-sac and 220-plus feet in width at the principal building setback. It contains 2.63-plus dry acres in area. It appears all required RR-1 B setbacks can reasonably be met when this lot is developed with a new home. Tree preservation easements are shown along the southern and western property boundaries. 4. Lot 4 is proposed to contain 2.18 acres total; 2.03 acres dry, buildable and 0.15 acre storm pond. The lot is proposed to primarily front along the private road with a small portion accessing off the cul-de-sac. It is proposed to have 2.038-plus dry acres and will have approximately 0.15 acre of this lot. All required Rr-lB setbacks can reasonably be met when this lot is redeveloped with a new home . This lot will also have a tree preservation easement along the western, rear lot line. 5. Lot 5 is proposed to contain 2.16 acres total; 2.12 acres dry , buildable and 0.04 acre storm pond. A tree preservation easement is proposed over the western and northern portions of the property. The applicant is proposing to plat Outlot A to create a private road with a cul-de-sac. City Codes require a 50-foot corridor and a l 00-foot cul-de-sac for a local private road. Street design information was submitted with the application materials and has been reviewed by the City Engineer. The original plan reflected necessitating variances. At first review of the applicant's revised plan , it appears that they do now meet the City 's dimensional and engineering size requirements for curve and slope. With the final plat application, the applicant will need to submit maintenance covenants for recording with the plat which address oncoming maintenance and upkeep of the private road. This property triggers the Rural Oasis Conservation Design Plan . A conservation plan dated February 6 was included in the Planning Commission 's packets. A preservation easement is proposed which will protect the significant trees identified on proposed Lot 2. The tree preservation easement is also proposed to extend along the perimeter of the entire property beginning at the south end of the wetland on the east and continuing around clockwise to the north end of proposed Lot 5. This tree preservation agreement will protect the significant trees identified on proposed Lot 2 as well as a stand of white pines on the western perimeter. A conservation easement is proposed at the north end of proposed Lot 1 where it abuts the Sims property. This easement may preserve lake views enjoyed from the Sims property. The applicant's plan also outlines invasive, on-native species to be removed. The report indicates the individual land owners should be responsible for invasive species removal upon construction of a new home. Staff would recommend the responsibility of the initial removal be placed on the developer, with the homeowners association being responsible for ongoing maintenance. The Planning Commission Page 5 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. should direct the applicant in this regard. Additionally, the Planning Commission should identify other areas which should be reviewed, protected, or preserved as part of the plat if appropriate. As part of the development, the applicant/developer will be required to plant one shade tree for every 40 feet of road frontage. Staff suggests the shade trees be of a complimentary native species to offset the removal of dead/diseased trees and possibly healthy native trees from the building sites. The City's 2008-2030 Comprehensive Trail System Map indicates that a future trail is planned on Bayside Road. The Planning Commission should discuss the merits of an easement for trail purposes adjacent to Bayside Road over the SO-foot road corridor outlot. The standard stormwater and drainage trunk fee will be applied to the development at the time of final plat. Staff would suggest the Planning Commission discuss the conservation design as well as any other areas the commissioners identify, specifically the invasive species removal. As noted, the Geffre driveway is not proposed to be relocated as required. The Planning Commission should discuss the recommendations of Staff and Hennepin County using the guidance provided in the Bayview Farms 2nd Addition resolutions and direct the applicant accordingly. In addition, Staff recommends the application be tabled upon providing clear direction to the applicant regarding expectations. The applicant should be prepared to discuss the is s ues with the Commission and prepare to draft revised plans as requested for placement on the March Planning Commission agenda. Schoenzeit commented the recommendations and requests by Staff seem very reasonable Bill Coffman, Coffman Development, stated they are willing to discus s the issues raised by Staff. Schoenzeit asked if the applicant is willing to deal with the invasive species as part of the development project. Coffman indicated they concur with Staff's recommendation. Schoenzeit asked if they are willing to grant a trail easement. Coffman stated they concur with that recommendation as well. Schoenzeit stated the conservation design report outlines the importance of cataloguing the trees and identifying any outstanding features of the land to be included and set up for preservation as well as addressing the invasive species to make sure they are properly identified. Coffman stated they have a plan that will be prepared for the HOA. Schoenzeit stated the last recommendation is that the existing home move their access, give up their county road curb cut and utilize the private road. Coffman stated Eric Sims is willing to connect up to the new road. As Staff mentioned, the Geffres would prefer not to hook up to the new road since it would create a longer driveway and would require Page 6 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. additional maintenance. Coffman indicated he is not sure how they would be able to require another landowner to give up their road access. Curtis indicated she did speak with Mr. Geffre on Thursday and that he indicated they do not want the additional expense of a longer driveway and that he wants to remain independent of the new subdivision. Mr. Geffre was not able to attend tonight's meeting but has submitted a letter detailing his concerns. Landgraver asked if the Geffres originally agreed with combining the driveways. Curtis indicated they did but that in speaking to them, she had the impression that they did not completely understand the ramifications of that. Mr. Geffre's February 14th letter states the following: "I am writing with some concerns regarding Land Use Proposition #13-3591. This proposition is in regards to connecting my existing driveway at 4665 Bayside Road with the proposed new private roadway to the Wachman Parcel. I am opposed to connecting my driveway to the proposed private roadway for the following reasons: No. 1. The new driveway would require much more maintenance and upkeep as it would be approximately I 00 feet longer; No. 2. The new driveway would come very close to my drain field. lt also would create a useless strip of land between the driveway and County Road 84; No. 3. We do not want to be responsible for any future repairs, maintenance or upgrading of the proposed private road." Lemke asked if Hennepin County will have any problems with the two curb cuts. Curtis indicated she cannot speak for Hennepin County but that the County's comments are included in the packet. Curtis stated she can ask for clarification from Hennepin County prior to this application going before the City Council if the Planning Commission would like. Landgraver stated as a point of order, there is nothing the Planning Commission can do about the drain field. Curtis stated Mr. Geffre's point was that it was very close to it and he does not want to impact it. Berg asked how far away the new road is from Mr. Geffre 's driveway. Gaffron stated it is approximately 150 feet. Schoenzeit commented that would also create a lot of hardcover. Landgraver stated in terms of the conservation easement, Staff brought up some good points about Mr. Sims' property. Landgraver asked if the applicant is agreeable to a conservation easement on the north end of Lot l . Coffman indicated they are proposing that. Page 7 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. Leskinen noted she did not have a chance to review the recently provided information and asked if the applicant is now proposing to pave the street to the 24' width and change the radius. Coffman stated they have resolved the issues with the road and the only variance they are now requesting is relating to the length of cul-de-sac. The cul-de-sac is presently 54 feet in excess of the City's Code. Lemke asked if the Sims' property would be part of the homeowner's association. Coffman indicated they would not be. Schoenzeit asked David Martini how the process is going with the developer and whether he has any concerns. David Martini, Consulting City Engineer, stated they have no concerns at this point but that they have not had a chance to review the latest information provided. The biggest concern related to the curve and the steepness of the road. Martini stated it appears with the new information submitted that those two things are being addressed. In going through the point by point response by the applicant, it looks like in general there is an effort being made to address the comments raised and that he did not note anything that was being disputed at this point. Martini stated there appears to be a good faith effort on the part of the applicant to address the comments raised by his office. Schoenzeit asked if Mr. Martini agrees that there should be as few variances as possible in light of the fact that this is a new development. Martini stated that is correct. Martini stated the Sims ' driveway is the most concerning with the closeness of the new road. Hennepin County will ultimately have the final input into what is allowed or not allowed for road access. Ideally, from an engineering standpoint, you will want to remove that driveway off of the county road and bring it into the private road but that the points brought up by the property owner are valid. Martini noted an easement wilt probably be required since that driveway will cross onto the neighbor's property to get to the private road. Martini stated there are certainly some challenges with being able to take that driveway and hook it up to the new road but that he would have to defer to Hennepin County. Schoenzeit commented it might be nice to pre-secure the easement if the access to the county road has to change at some point. Chair Schoenzeit opened the public hearing at 7:08 p .m. Peter Meyers, 70 and l 00 North Shore Drive, stated they have a concern related to the fact that this is a very quiet area with deep lots, wildlife and a marsh, all of which will be changed as a result of the subdivision. Meyers stated in his view the noise would be greatly increased with this development. Meyers indicated even today he can hear a neighbor who is well off to the east of them in their swimming pool, and that placing more homes into this area is problematic. Meyers stated he and his wife are not in favor of further development of this area. Schoenzeit asked if he is proposing an alternative to this project. Meyers indicated he is not. Page 8 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. Pat Thull, 210 North Shore Drive, illustrated her property on the overhead. Thull indicated she is glad to see the tree buffer preserved but that they are not proposing a tree buffer between their property and this development. Since their patio is very close to the property line and their house is located uphill from this development, it would be nice not to have to look down on the homes. Thull stated she would like some consideration given to some trees being planted in that area since this development changes the existing environment. Thull stated in order to accommodate the people who have been living there, she would like to see more of a buffer between the current buildings around the property. According to the aerial view, there are no trees and she does not understand why that is being called a tree buffer. Chair Schoenzeit closed the public hearing at 7: 13 p.m. Schoenzeit stated the point about mixing a new development with an old neighborhood is a good point and one that the Planning Commission should review. Berg asked if there are any trees at this time in that area. Thull indicated there are not. Schoenzeit asked if the developer is amenable to planting some trees io that area. Coffman stated the aerial does depict some trees between this development and the Wachman property. The Wachmans have owned the property for 20 years and were there prior to many of the other homes in the area. Coffman indicated they are certainly willing to take a look at planting some additional trees along the edge to strengthen that buffer in an effort to be a good neighbor. Schoenzeit asked if that would be satisfactory. Thull indicated she would appreciate that. Landgraver asked if Staff has any other items they would like the Planning Commission to discuss. Curtis indicated at this point it appears the applicant has addressed a number of the issues in their new submittal of information and that she would encourage the Planning Commission to reiterate the direction they would like the applicant to follow. Schoenzeit stated in following the recommendations of Staff and the City Engineer, the Planning Commission would like to see zero variances other than the cul-de-sac length. In addition, the Planning Commission would like to see the developer include the invasive species cataloguing and proposed removals, the granting of the requested trail easement, and ensuring that the design conservation report is detailed as to the negative aspects that need to be corrected and the positive features that need to be preserved. Schoenzeit stated the Planning Commi ssion heard some compelling reasons against removing the curb cut for the neighbor that is not part of the development and adding some more trees to the buffer as proposed for other areas. Coffman indicated he is agreeable with that. Page 9 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. Schoenzeit asked if the Planning Commission should table the application. Coffman requested they be allowed to move forward to the City Council. Schoenzeit stated the Planning Commission's recommendation would be that the checklist be documented and accepted by City Staff prior to the application proceeding to the City Council. Landgraver noted the nature of the neighborhood is changing but that the development is compliant. Schoenzeit stated the Planning Commission's role is to ensure that the application is compliant with City regulations, and that if the request is compliant, the Planning Commission has a duty to make their recommendations to the City Council. Gaffron asked if the developer is going to grade in building pads at specific locations . Coffman stated there will be some grading done but not a lot. Gaffron asked if any potential buyers have expressed interest in any particular lot. Coffman indicated the development is still very conceptual at this point. Schoenzeit encouraged the developer to continue to work with Staff to resolve all the issues prior to this application proceeding to the City Council. Schoenzeit reiterated his recommendation that the application contain no variance requests. Landgraver moved, Leskinen seconded, to recommend approval of Application #13-3591, Ervin Wachman, Outlot C, Bayview Farms 2nd Addition, Preliminary Plat/Subdivision, subject to the developer accepting removal of the invasive species as part of the development project, granting of the requested trail easement as requested by Staff and City Engineer, that the conservation design report will be detailed in nature outlining both the positive aspects and the negative aspects that need to be corrected, and that the developer include a tree buffer for the rest of the property as requested by the neighbor with similar planting density as the other tree buffers to be installed as part of this project. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 4. 13-3592 PILLAR HOMES ON BEHALF OF BRIAN AND 3955 WA: TOW ROAD, VARIANCES, 7:22 P.M. -7:31 P The applicant · oposing to remove the existing home and garage onstruct a new single-family home. T roperty is smaller than the required five acres and is awkward ed. The septic locations opography offer additional limitations for the building site. In addition tot area variance , applicant is requesting setback variances to allow construction of the home 50 feet fro the front Page 10 of 23 Christine Mattson From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Good afternoon, Catherine Bach [cbach@minnehahacreek.org] Friday, December 28, 2012 12 :22 PM 'Stacey.Lijewski@co.hennepin .mn .us'; 'Peterson , Lynda (BWSR)'; 'Doperalski, Melissa (DNR)'; 'Jenny, Melissa M MVP'; Coffman, William D ; melissa@kjolhaugenv.com ; Christine Mattson WCA Boundary & Type Notice of Application -Wachman Parcel , Orono W12-52_Boundary & Type NOA.pdf Please find attached a Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Application for a wetland boundary & type determination for the Wachman parcel in the city of Orono (PID #0611723220018). The complete application is included. Comments on this application will be accepted until 4:30 PM on January 22, 2012. Feel free to contact me with any questions. Catherine Bach District Technician Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 18202 Minnetonka Boulevard Deephaven, MN 55391 Direct : (952) 641-4504 Main Office : (952) 471-0590 Fax: 952-471-0682 www.m i nnehahacreek.org • MINNEHAHA CREEK w;.TEU HU > P t$0 1CT ~Think Gree n -please do not pri nt thi s e m ail unless nece ss ary 1 Hennepin County GIS -Printable Map 06-117-23-22-0018 A-T-B: Owner Ervin A Wachman Jr Market Name: Total: Parcel 38 Address Unassigned Tax Address : Orono, MN 00000 Total: Property Farm Sale Type: Price : Home-Non-Homestead Sale stead: Date : Parcel 13.72 acres Sale Area: 597,650 sq ft Code : Torrens $475,000 $4,417 .68 (Payab le: 2012) $185,000 04/1996 Page 1 of 1 Property Map N Print Date: 1/11/2013 -$ I This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" w ith no I representation or warranty expressed or I implied, including fitness of any particular purpose. merchantability, or the accuracy and 1 completeness of the information shown. I COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COU NTY 2013 .A Think Green! http://gis.eo.hennepin.rnn.us/Property/print/default.aspx ?C=449443.5869723901,4980574.... 1/11 /2013 Minnesota Wetland Consetvation Act Notice of Application Local Government Unit (LOU) Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Address 18202 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Project Name Date of Bill Coffman Wachman Parcel Application 10/22/12 (completed 12/5/12) Type of Application (check all that apply): Application Number W12-52 IX] Wetland Boundary or Type 0No-Loss 0Exemption D Banking Plan D Sequencing D Replacement Plan Summary and description of proposed project (attach additional sheets as necessary): Bill Coffman has applied for wetland boundary & type approval for the parcel located approximately 400 feet south of Bayside Road and south of 4665 & 4645 Bayside Road (PID #0611723220018). The application was received on October 22, 2012 and completed on December 5, 2012 . T he delineation was performed by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (KES) on October 12, 2012. T he boundary was reviewed in the field on November 21, 2012 by MCWD s taff. 2. APPLICATION REVIEW AND DECISION Sig ning and m a iling of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 3 provides notice that an application was made to the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. A copy of the application is attached. Comments c a n be submitted to: Name and Title ofLGU Contact Person Comments must be received by (minimum 15 Catherine Bach bu siness-day comment period): District Technician ,January 22, 2012 (4:30 PM) Address (if different than LOU) Date, time, and location of decision: 18202 Minnetonlrn Blvd A decision will be made following completion of Deephaven, MN 55391 the comment period. Phone Number and E-mail Address Decision-maker for this application: (952) 641-4504 [8'.I Staff cbach@minnehahacrcek.org D Governing Board 01· Council Date: ~uj1v BWSR Fo rm s 7-1-10 Page 1 of2 3. LIST OF ADDRESSEES [8J SWCD TEP member: Stacey Lijewski -stacey.lijewski@co.hennepin.mn.us [8J BWSR TEP member: Lynda Peterson -lynda.petcrson@state.mn.us D LGU TEP member (if different than LGU Contact): D DNR TEP member: [8J DNR Regional Office (if different than DNR TEP member): Melissa Doperalsld - Melissa.Doperalsld@state.mn.us D WD or WMO (if applicable): [8J Applicant (notice only) and Landowner (if different): Bill Coffman -billcoffman@cbburnet.com [8J Members of the public who requested notice (notice only): Consultant: KES (Melissa Barrett)-Melissa@kjolhaugenv.com City: Christine Mattson -cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us [8J Corps of Engineers Project Manager (notice only): Melissa Jenny -Melissa.m.jenny@usace.army.mil D BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator (wetland bank plan applications only) 4. MAILING INFORMATION >Fora list of BWSR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.rnn.us/contact/WCA areas.pdf >Fora list of DNR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.rnn.us/wetlands/wca/DNR TEP contacts.pdf Department o Natura Resources Reg1ona ices : f I Offi NW Region: NE Region: Central Reg ion: Southern Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Eco l. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Eco l. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. NE 1201 E. Hwy. 2 1200 Warner Road 261 Hwy. 15 South Bemidii, MN 56601 Grand Rapids, MN 55744 St. Paul, MN 55106 New Ulm, MN 56073 For a map ofDNR Administrative Regions, see: http://files.dnr.state.rnn.us/aboutdnr/dnr regions.pdf >Fora list of Corps of Project Managers: www.mvp.usace.army.mil/regulatory/defau1t.asp?pageid=687 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District, ATTN: OP-R 180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700 St. Paul, MN 5510 1-1678 > For Wetland Bank Plan applications, also send a copy of the application to: MiJU1esota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 5. ATTACHMENTS In add ition to the appli cation, list any other attachments: D D D D D BWSR Forms 7-1 -10 Page 2 of 2 Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Application for Approval of Wetland Type and Boundary 1. Project/Site Information Project/Site Name: Wachman Parcel Local Government Unit: MCWD Location (address and/or T, R, Sec.): T117N, R23W, Sec 6 Applicant Name: Bili Coffman 2. Applicant Information Address: 201 East Lake Street City, State, Zip: Wayzata, MN 55391-1695 E-mail: Phone: 3. Agent/Consu ltant Information Company Name (if applicable): Kjolhaug Environmental Contact Person: Melissa Barrett Address: 26105 Wild Rose Lane E-mail: melissa@kjolhaugenv.com City, State, Zip: Shorewood, MN 55331 Phone: 952-401-8757 4. Description of Request Check all that apply: X Wetland Boundary (must attach wetland delineation report) X Wetland Type (Eggers & Reed and/or Circular 39 type) 5. Signature By signature below, the applicant requests a determination from the Local Government Unit under Minnesota Rules 8420.0225 on the submitted wetland boundary and type information in this application. The applicant also affirms that they are the owner of the subject property or have permission from th e land~~ 1:ue ~s ,det:min~on -filJJ_/vVL (.U/?1/ ~ I ~/z2 I /Z--. Applicant or Authorized Agent Signature Date Important Notes: • The applicant may be required to submit multiple copies of the report/information to the LGU. The LGU may require the applicant to submit copies directly to Technical Evaluation Panel Members. Check with your LGU regarding their submittal requirements. • The LGU decision must be made in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, section 15.99. For LGU use only Date Received: Page 1 of 1 BWSR Wetland Boundary/Type Application Form 11/10/08 From: To: Subject: Date: Catherine, menssa@kio lhaugenv com Catherine Bach Coffman phone number Wednesday, December 05, 2012 2:07:39 PM Bill's number is 612-202-0692 Melissa Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G L TE Smartphone Wachman Parcel Orono, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report Prepared for Bill Coffman by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (KES Project No. 2012-068) October 22, 2012 WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY • The Watchman parcel was inspected on October 12, 2012 for the presence and extent of wetland. • The NWI-map showed one PUBGx/PEMA wetland within site boundaries. • The soil survey shows that all soils present within site boundaries are partially hydric. • The DNR Protected Waters Map did not show any DNR Protected Waters, Waterways , or Wetlands within or near site boundaries. • One Type 4 (PUBGx/PEMA) excavated, open water and fresh (wet) meadow wetland complex was delineated within site boundaries. W achman Parcel Orono, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report I. INTRODUCTION The Wachman Parcel was examined on October 12, 2012 for the presence and extent of wetland. The 13.72-acre site was located in Section 6, Township 117N, Range 23W, City of Orono , Hennepin County, Minnesota, approximately 400 feet south of Bayside Road, and south of the addresses of 4665 and 4645 Bayside Road (Figure 1). The western half of the site consisted of a hayfield. The eastern half of the site was moderately sloping deciduous woodland in the south, and sloping meadow and flat wetland in the north (Figure 2). Topography for the site generally sloped downhill to the east central portion of the site (i.e. slopes downhill in all directions towards the wetland). II. METHODS Wetlands were identified using Routine Determination methodology described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Waterways Experiment Station, 1987) and R egional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual : Midwest as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Wetland boundaries were identified as the upper-most extent of wetlands, which met criteria for hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrology. Wetland-upland boundaries were marked with pink pin flags and located by Sathre-Berquist. Soils, vegetation, and hydrology were documented at representative locations along th e wetland- upland boundary. Plant species dominance was estimated ba sed on the percent aerial or basal coverage visually estimated within a 30-foot radius for trees and vines , 15-foot radius for the shrub layer, and a 5-foot radiu s for the herbaceous layer within the community type being sampled. Soils were characterized to a minimum depth of 18-20 inches (unless otherwise noted) utilizing Munsell Soil Color Charts and standard soil texturing methodology. Hydric soil indicators used in reporting are from the NTCHS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Version 7 , 2010) which are commonly found in the Midwest. Plants were identified using standard regional plant ke ys . Taxonomy was based on the Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada, Ed. 2 (New York 2 Botanical Garden , 1991 ). Indicator status of plant species was taken from the 2012 National Wetland Plant List (Lichvar, R.W. and Kartesz, J.T. 2009. North American Digital Flora: National Wetland Plant List, version 2.4.0 (https://wetland_plants.u sace.army.mil). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH, and BONAP, Chapel Hill , NC.) III. RES UL TS Review of Soils, NWI, and DNR Information The National Wetland Inventory Map (NWI) (Mound Quadrangle , U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 1989) showed one PUBGx/PEMA wetland within the site boundaries (Figure 3). The Soil Survey of Hennepin County, Minnesota (http://soils.usda.gov/survey/geography/ssurgo/) showed the following soi l types within o r near site boundaries (Figure 4). Partially hydric means that at least one component of the map unit is rated as hydric. SMU Map U nit Name Hydric? L22E Lester loam , morainic, 18 to 25 percent slopes Partially hydric L23A Cordova loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Partially hydric L3 6A Hamel, overwash-Hamel comp lex, l to 4 percent s lopes Pa rti a lly hydric L4 0B Angus-Kilke nny complex, 2 to 6 percent s lopes Partia lly hydri c L41C2 Lest er-Kilkenny complex, 6 to 12 percent s lo pes , e roded Partially h ydri c L41E Le ster-Kilkenny complex, 18 to 25 percent slopes Partially h ydric The DNR Protected Waters Map, Henn epin County (http://de li.dnr.state.mn.us/) did not s how a ny DNR Protected Waters, Wa terwa ys, or Wetlands within o r near site boundaries (Figure 5). Wetland Determinations and Delineations Potential wetlands were eva luated in g rea t e r detai I during field observations on October 1, 2012. One wetland was identified and de lineated o n the subject site (Figure 2). Corresponding d ata forms are included in Appendix A . T he following de scription of the wetland and adjacent upland refl ects co nditions observed at the time of the fi e ld visit. At that time, herbaceou s vegetation was actively g rowing and temperatures were t y pical of the season. Wetland hydrol ogy was assumed to be drier than typi cal for that date based o n be lo w normal precipitation amounts in for the pre ced ing 30 days (Appendix B). T he surv ey of the wetland bounda r y is presented in Appendix C. Wetland 1 was a Type 4 (PUBGx/PEMA) excavated, open water and fresh (wet) meadow wetland complex . The PUBGx portio n of the wetland was un-ve get a ted and dry . The center of the basin was a n upland knoll dominated by a canopy of boxelder. For the purposes of thi s delineatio n it was included w ithin the wetland boundary . Fresh (wet) meadow was do mina t ed b y reed canary grass with lesse r a m o unts of giant go ld e nrod a nd Canada thistle. Other non- 3 dominant vegetation observed included: garlic mustard , asters, blue vervain, sedge, black willow, boxelder, and American elm. Soils observed below the wetland boundary were black silty clay loam to 44 inches underlain by depleted silty clay loam, meeting the F12 indicator for hydric soil (thick dark surface). No free water or saturated soil was observed within 46 inches the soil surface in the sample borehole. Secondary indicators of wetland hydrology included geomorphic position and the FAC-Neutral Test. Adjacent upland at the sample location was dominated by a canopy of green ash and sugar maple, and an understory of common burdock, motherwort, garlic mustard , aster, and reed canary grass. Upland soils also met the Al2 indicator for hydric soil. No primary or secondary indicators of wetland hydrology were observed. The delineated boundary followed a slight change in vegetation composition (an increase in Canada thistle, Canada goldenrod, and common milkweed) and a gradual change in topography. Wetland I corresponded to an NWI-mapped wetland and was located within an area mapped with Hamel (poorly drained, and somewhat poorly drained) soil on the soil survey. The wetland extended off the site to the east. Other Areas No other areas with wetland vegetation or hydrology were observed on the site. No other areas w ere shown as wetland on the NWI map. 4 V. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION The procedures utilized in the described delineation are based on the COE 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Both the delineation and report were conducted in compliance with regulatory standards in place at the time the work was completed. All site boundaries indicated on figures within this report are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Delineation Completed by: Melissa Lauterbach-Barrett, Soil Scientist Certified Wetland Delineator No. I 085 Professional Soil Scientist No. 45067 Report reviewed by: ____ u_~----------Date: October 22, 2012 Mark Kjolhaug, Professional Wetland Scientist No . 000845 5 Wachman Parcel Wetland Delineation Report Figures: • Figure I -Site Location Map • Figure 2 -Aerial Photograph • Figure 3 -NWI Map • Figure 4 -Soil Survey Map • Figure 5 -DNR Protected Waters Map Note: Site boundaries on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. 19 ~o ~fl,..;,, d I., ~ ....__s __ it_e_L_o_c_a_ti_o_n __ ..r~=====~B-JyoeRo ~ N :.i.rm )r •rt F 110 ch Lake l ;·n w(J,_,t: Blo:c/ t )i (i il9l 1on ll'llt:t> 19 Jennings Bay Hamsons Boy .\/1 0 U fl d Seton I 11lto Mrest Saga Hi ll La~i· /\/ S/10 ~> o, West Arm Sp rin g Park Lake Classen ~: Wayzat.i Blvd \N O t on0 Stubbs Bay Arm Maxwell Boy 135 ._\ <:,n o r ;, i), F:er,ch Lake HG ·, " ,::;. Crlstal Ba y Crystal 51 Bay Mi n 1etr_·,n 1 a 8P Eich ·~ '15 !:.r Sh o r el ir:e Dr ?lo: Lof7Yr>tr Bay :J;t-,, © 2:,12 t,l i:ro;;c,f1 Cc,rp o_r:;1i c,r, © 2:l12 tfoki:. Figure 1 -Site Location Map -------- Wachman Parcel (KES No. 2012-068) Orono, Minnesota FqoLHAuc ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE S C OMPANY No Scale Note: Site boundaries on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Figure 2 -2012 Aerial Photograph Wachman Pa rcel (KES No. 2012-068) ~ JvoLHAua ENVIRON MENTAL SERVICES C OMPANY ------- Orono, Minnesota 1 inch -241 feet Note: Site boundaries on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ~-.~ .. ( .. ft ; . ·! ', I I j I / I ___ / ( ,l... Figure 3 -NWI Map (USGS Mound Quadrangle) Wachman Parcel (KES No. 2012-068) Orono, Minnesota fvOLIIAUG E NV IR ON ME NTAL SERV IC ES C OMPANY 1 inch -650 feet Note: Site boundaries on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Soil Legend L22E -Lester loam, morainic, 18 to 25 percent slopes L23A -Cordova loam, 0 to 2 percent s lopes L36A -Hamel , overwash-Hamel complex, I to 4 percent slopes L40B -Angus-Kilkenny complex, 2 to 6 percent s lopes L41C2 -Lester-Kilkenny complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded L41E -Lester-Kilkenny complex, 18 to 25 percent slopes Figure 4-Soil Survey Map ----- Wachman Parcel (KES No. 2012-068) Orono, Minnesota K!OLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY I inch -265 fee t Note: Site boundaries on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Figure 5-DNR Protected Waters Map Wachman Parcel (KES No. 2012-068) Orono, Minnesota 1 inch -520 feet K!OLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY Wachman Parcel Wetland Delineation Report Appendix A: Data Forms WETLAND D ETERMINATIO N DATA FOR M -Mid west R egion ProjecUSite Wachman Parcel City/County: Orono/Henn Sampling Date: 10/12/12 ---------App Ii can U Owner: B. Coffman State: MN Sampling Point: SP1-upl -----------------1 n vest i gator ( s): M . Barrett 3ection, Township, Range: 6, 117, 23 ---------'---'-------L and form (hillslope , terrace, etc.): above toeslope depression Loca l relief (concave, convex, none): low flat slope -------"-----Slope(%): 1-4 Lat: __________ _ Long: Datum: -----------Soi l Map Unit Name Hamel \JW I Classification: PUBGx/PEMA A re cl i matic/hydrol o gic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal ci rcumstances" Are vegetation . soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FIN DI N GS (If needed, explai n any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation p resent? N -- Hyd ric soi l present? y Is the sa mpl ed area wi thi n a wetlan d? N -- Indicators of wetland hyd rology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (E xplai n alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) 30-day rol li ng precipitation average be low normal VEGETATIO N --Use scienti fic names of plants. Absolute Domin an Ind icator Dominance Test Wor ks h eet Tree Stratum (Pl ot si ze: 30 ) % Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus pennsy/vanica 20 y FACW that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) 2 Acer saccharum 20 y FACU Total Number of Dominan t Lf 3 Species Across all Strata: (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 75" 5 that are OBL. FACW, or FAC: (A/B ) 40 = Total Cover SaQling/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ) Prevalence I ndex Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species -X 1 = - 3 FACW sp ecies _..2Q_ x 2 = 06 4 FAC species i5 X 3 = !i£_ 5 FACU species 3o x4= _&_Q_ 0 = Total Cover UPL species 5 x5 = ~ Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Col umn totals 'lo (A) ~(B) 1 Alliaria petiolata 15 y FAC Prevalence Index = B/A = 3 . /2, 5'" 2 Phalaris arundinacea 10 y FACW 3 Cirsium arvense 5 N FACU Hydro phytic Vegetation I nd icators: 4 Asc/epias syriaca 5 N FACU Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 -5 I (. ()tl, VV'!.L_ > C4 rd, ?t C-"'--Al (,!_flL Dominance test is >50% -6 r Preva lence i ndex is !:3.0* -7 Morphogical adaptations* (provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) -10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* tf-o~ = Total Cover (expl ain) -W ood':f. vine stratum (P lot size: 3Q ) ·indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present. unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hyd roph ytic 0 = T otal Cover vege tatio n present? N --- Remarks: (Include photo numbers he re or o n a separate sheet) jtM,i-J. ,Li c..ptr.hP(. Fr-Ayt'/'W517eh'Yl~fvd'vi ,?~ a"1.~ 71tvt,i.... m vS f ~J-n-rfh. ~~~ U S Amy Corps of Eng in eers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: S P1-upl Profile Desc riptio n : (De scribe to t he depth needed t o d ocument the indicato r or confirm the absen ce o f indicators.) Depth M atrix Re dox Featu res (In c hes) Color (moist) % Colo r (m oi st) % T ype* Loe** Texture Remark s 0-40 10Y R 2/1 100 FS SCL 40-44 10YR 4/2 98 10YR 4/3 2 C M SCL *Type : C = Concentra tion, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix , MS = Masked Sand Gra ins . **Location: PL = Po re Lining , M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric S oils: Histi sol (A 1) Sa ndy G leyed Matrix (S4) --Coast P rairie Re dox (A16) (LRR K, L , R) --Histi c Epipe don (A2) --Sa nd y Redox (S5) D ark Surfa ce (S7) (LRR K, L) --Bl ac k Hist ic (A3) --Stripped Matrix (S6) -Iro n-Ma nganese Masses (F1 2) (LRR K, L , R) ------Hydrogen S ulf ide (A4) Loam y Mucky Min eral (F1 ) V ery Sha llow Dark S urface (TF12) --Stratified Layers (AS) --Loamy Gleyed Matri x (F2) --O th er (e xplain in remarks) --2 cm Muck (A10) --Depl eted M atrix (F3) -- ----De ple ted Below Dark Su rface (A 1 1) Redox Da rk Surface (F6) XThic k Dark Surface (A12) --Depl eted Da rk Su rface (F7) --*Indicators o f hydro phyt ic vege tatio n and weltan d --S andy Mucky M inera l (S 1) --Redox De p ressions (F8) hyd ro log y mu st be presen t, un less d is tu rbed or 5 c m Muck y Peat or Peat (S3) --problem ati c Restri ctive Layer (if observed): Typ e: Hydric soil prese nt? y Dep th (i nches): Rem arks: Soil s were extremely dry and ha rd to sam ple. Deple ted layer was d ocume nte d starting at 4 0 inc hes depth. Based o n professional experi ence as a soil scientist it is k nown that the next 2 inc hes de pth of soil will be the same coloer or even m o re d epl eted in colo r. Soil m eet s A 12 . HYDROLOGY Wetl and Hy drology Indi ca tors: Prima!Y Ind ica tors (min imum o f one is reguire d; check a ll that a1;rn l:il Seconda!Y I ndi ca to rs (m inim um of two regu i red) Surface Wate r (A1) Aqua tic Fauna (813) --Surface Soil Cracks (86) -----True Aquatic Plants (81 4) Drainage Pattern s (8 10) _ High w_ater Ta bl e (A2) --_ Sat urati on (A3) -Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Seaso n Water Tabl e (C2) _ Water Marks (8 1) -Ox id ized Rhi zosp heres on Livin g Roots --Crayfish Burrows (CB) _ Sed im ent Deposi ts (82) (C3) --Sa turation Vi si bl e on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Dri ft Depo sits (83) -Prese nce of Redu ce d Iron (C4) --Stunted or Stressed Plants (D 1) Alga l Mat or Crust (8 4) -Recen t Iron Reduction in Ti lled Soi ls --Geomorphic Position (D2) -Iron Deposits (85) (C6) x FAG-Neu tra l Tes t (D5) -Inundati on Vis ible on A eria l Imagery (87) --Thin Muck Surfa ce (C7) -- -Sparsel y Vegetated Concave Su rface (8 8) --Gauge or We ll Data (D9) --___ Water-Stai ned Leaves (89) Other (Exp lai n in Remarks) Fi eld Observations: S urface wa te r present? Yes No X Dep th (in ches): Water t abl e present? Yes No X Dep th (i nches): Indicators of w etla nd Saturat io n p resent? Yes No X Depth (in ches): hyd rology pres ent? N (inc l udes capillary fringe) Desc ribe recorded data (stream g auge, monito ring well , ae ria l photos, previous inspections), if avail able: Rema rks : US Ar my Co rp s of Engi nee r s Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region Project/Site Wachman Parcel City/County: Orono/Henn Sampling Date: 10/12/12 -----------------Applicant/Owner: B . Coffman State: MN Sampling Point: SP1-wet ------------------------- lnvestigator(s): M. Barrett 5ection , Township, Range: 6, 117, 23 --------------Land form (hillslope , terrace, etc.): toeslope depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): slight flat slope -----------S I ope(%): 0-3 Lat:___________ Long : Datum: __________ _ Soil Map Unit Name Hamel \JWI Classification: PUBGx/PEMA ------------------------------------Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks .) Hydrophytic vegetation present? y --Hydric soi l present? y Is the sampled area within a wetland? y -- Indicators of wetland hydrology present? y f yes , optional wetland site ID: Wetland 1 Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) 30-day rolling precipitation average below normal VEGETATION -Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC : 1 (A) 2 Total Number of Dom inant 3 Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC : 100.00% (A/B) 0 = Total Cover Sagling /S hrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of : 2 OBLspecies 0 X 1 = 0 ---3 FACW species 100 x2= 200 ---4 FAC species 0 x3= 0 ------5 FACU species 5 x4= 20 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x5= 0 ------Herb stratum (Plot size : 5 ) Column totals 105 (A) 220 (B) ------ 1 Pha/aris arundinacea 100 y FACW Prevalence Index = BIA= 2.10 2 Cirsium arvense 5 N FACU 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vege tation -5 X Dominance test is >50% -6 X Prevalence index is :53.0* -7 Morphogical adaptations* (provide 8 supporting data in Remarks o r on a 9 separate sheet) -10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 105 = Total Cover (explain) -Woody_ vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ) "Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrolo gy must be 1 present, unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophyt1c 0 = Total Cover vegetation present? y --- Remarks : (In clude photo numbers here or on a sepa rate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engin ee r s Midwes t Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP1-wet Profile Description : (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type* Loe** Texture Remarks 0-44 10YR 2/2 100 SCL 44-46 10YR 4/1 100 SCL *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location : PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils : --Histisol (A 1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) --Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L , R) Histic Epipedon (A2) --Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) --Black Histic (A3) --Stripped Matrix (S6) -,ran-Manganese Masses (F1 2) (LRR K, L, R) --------Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) --Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) --Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) --Stratified Layers (A5) --Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) --Other (explain in remarks) --2 cm Muck (A10) --Depleted Matrix (F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) --X Thick Dark Surface (A 12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) --*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand --Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1) --Redox Depressions (F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) problematic -- Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? y Depth (inches): Remarks: Soils were extremely dry and hard to auger. 0-44 in so ils were 2/2 in color dry, 2/1 in color wet. statrted at 44 inches. The auger is not longer than 46 inc hes. Ba sed on professional experience as a soils scientist it is know that the next two inches are also depleted in color. Soil meets A12. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primar:y Indicators (minimum of one is regu ired; check all that aggl~l Secondar:y Indicators (minimum of two reguired) Surfa ce Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ~ High Water Table (A2) -True Aquatic Plants (B 14) --Drainage Patterns (B 10) ----_ Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) --Dry-Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) -Oxidi zed Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfi sh Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2) (C3) --Saturati on V isible on Aerial Imagery (C9) -Drift Dep osits (B3) -Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) --Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) -Algal Mat or Crust (B4) -Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil s X Geomorphi c Position (D2) -x _ Iron Deposits (BS) (C6) FAC -N eutra l Test (DS) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) -Thin Muck Surface (C7) -- -Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) -Gauge or Well Data (D9) --_ Wa ter-Sta ined Leaves (B9) Oth er (Exp lain in Remarks) Field Observations : Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (in ches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology present? y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well , aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Enginee r s Midwest Region Wachman Parcel Wetland Delineation Report Appendix B: Precipitation Data Wachman Parcel, Orono: Precipitation Summary Source: Minnesota Climatology Working Group Monthly Totals: 2012 Target: T117 R23 S6 , Lat: 44 .97133 Lon: 93.63515 mon year cc tttN rrw ss nnnn 00000000 pre Jan 2012 217935 .49 Feb 2012 217935 1.73 Mar 2012 217935 1.70 Apr 2012 217935 2.96 May 2012 217935 9.55 J un 2012 27 118N 23w 22 SWCD 3.96 J ul 2012 217935 4 .75 Aug 2012 27 117N 24W 27 BYRG 2.83 Sep 2012 27 117N 24W 27 BYRG .45 August/September/October Daily Records Date Precip. Date Preci p. Date Precip. Aug 1, 2012 0 Sep 1, 2012 0 Oct 1, 2012 0 Aug 2, 2012 .01 Sep 2, 2012 0 Oct 2, 2012 0 Aug 3, 2012 0 Sep 3, 2012 0 Oct 3, 2012 0 Aug 4, 2012 .49 Sep 4, 2012 0 Oct 4, 2012 0 Aug 5, 2012 0 Sep 5' 2012 .02 Oct 5. 2012 0 Aug 6, 2012 0 Sep 6, 2012 0 Oct 6, 2012 T Aug 7, 2012 0 Sep 7, 2012 T Oct 7, 2012 0 Aug 8, 2012 0 Sep 8, 2012 0 Oct 8, 2012 T Aug 9, 2012 0 Sep 9, 2012 0 Oct 9, 2012 .02 Aug 10, 2012 0 Sep 10, 2012 0 Oct 10, 2012 0 Aug 11, 2012 0 Sep 11, 2012 0 Oct 11, 2012 0 Aug 12, 2012 T Sep 12, 20 12 0 Oct 12, 2012 0 Aug 13, 2012 .09 Sep 13, 20 12 .11 Aug 14, 2012 0 Se p 14, 2012 0 Aug 15, 2012 .07 Se p 15, 2012 0 Aug 16, 2012 .14 Sep 16, 2012 0 Aug 17, 2012 0 Sep 17, 2012 .3 2 Aug 18, 2012 0 Sep 18, 2012 0 Aug 19, 2012 .31 Sep 19, 2012 0 Aug 20, 2012 0 Sep 20, 2012 0 Aug 21, 2012 0 Sep 21, 2012 0 Aug 22, 2012 0 Sep 22, 2012 T Aug 23, 2012 . 35 Sep 23, 2012 0 Aug 24, 2012 1. 37 Sep 24, 2012 0 Aug 25, 2012 0 Sep 25, 2012 0 Aug 26, 2012 0 Sep 26, 2012 0 Aug 27, 2012 0 Sep 27, 2012 0 Aug 28 , 2012 0 Sep 28, 2012 0 Aug 29 , 2012 0 Sep 29, 2012 0 Aug 30, 2012 0 Sep 30, 2012 0 Aug 31, 2012 0 site visit 7 -~ 6 .c (.) C: ·-- C. (.) Wachrnan Parcel, Orono f 4 +-lf----\~~~-1-~-=--~~-='-~i---..-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-=--=i C. ~ -0 - .c -C: 0 E "C C: ~ >. ~ C 1 T Site visit October 12, 2012 0 +-r-'i-......~l --1 .---..-'-~-o+-r-_1 _T_I ---------- 7/11/12 7/26/12 8/10/12 8/25/12 9/9/12 9/24 /12 10/9/12 o monthly precip -daily precip -30d rolling total Wachman Parcel Wetland Delineation Report Appendix C: Wetland Boundary Survey OE~N OATA: ~=:;.~~ MIN I.OTWIO " FVSll,50FT :;:s~~~n RYSa·~H ::"'M~=':;~IOOOFT Melanie Curtis From: Melanie Curtis Sent: To: Monday, February 25, 2013 11 :53 AM 'Coffman , William D' Cc: 'Bob Molstad'; 'melissa@kjolhaugenv.com'; 'shellwachm@msn.com'; 'Robert Bean'; David P. Martini Subject: 13-3591 PC Action Notice Bill As you are aware, the Orono Planning Commission reviewied your application for preliminary plat of Outlot C Bayside Meadows (File #13-3591) on Tuesday, February 19th. The Planning Commission acknowledged your recently revised plans and, with conditions, recommend approval of the preliminary plat. The approval conditions are as follows: 1. Revise the landscape plan to include additional, similar native trees to be planted along the entire southern property boundary showing a tree preservation easement. 2. Revise the landscape plan to reflect removal of invasive species as identified within the KES conservation design report. 3. Address on-going maintenance and removal of invasive species within the HOA documents . 4. Only the variance for the cul-de-sac length was acceptable. All other code requirements must be met with revised plans. 5. Geffre curb cut to be addressed, if needed, by Hennepin County. 6. The revised plans should reflect a trail easement 10 feet in width abutting Bayside Road. Complet e sets of the r evised plans and/or infor mation a re requried to be submitted to the City for review by or before Febr uary 28th at n oon in order for consideration on the City Council's March 11th meeting. Two full-sized sets of complete, revi sed plans and one copy of a reduced full set 11x 17 or smaller is required. Digital copies may replace the reduced set. Pl ease let me know if you have any questions. Melanie Me lanie Curtis Planning & Zoning Coord inat or City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Direct Dial : 952.249.4627 Fax: 952 .249.4616 Planning & Zoning Office 952.249.4620 Em ail: mc urti s@ci.orono.mn .us We bsi t e : www .ci.orono.mn.us City of Orono Office Hours Monday -Fr iday 8:00 am -4 :30 pm 1 ~tr~-~======~-~- ~~?led ~uu, k:¥2 ~tA uu:tz ~ ~ ck~p<- t+v A-f;O l tCTlA> up ' . . ~ -~ ~ t)&,-WU(, c:10- ~lm ~e1f0 --'? ~E>cf ~. ~~ rdPud-tdh ~ ~ = d/l &~w~t;~,,( hr, vet~~. trY 4 ~ ~Utrf\--. .:£ { ~ re,! 0 ta:fz,(JY\, c{ tvu/)7 UlUn-fiJ @»t~ f?ottJ-V-1 1 mtuLp~ w~ ~ >~ ( ~ 4 e,wµ ~c. O"M ~ VaA,t,~ce ) /§~]-P;°PC'Sd ~~~~/ /Ul WI/~ OPlAk' tu~~. lffe,U'/d ~I~ /pa+ ,h iM:;L, / -/J/)'1?'-&4 CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 952.249.4600 TO: Ervin Wachman 2135 Salem Ct Long Lake, MN 55356 TYPE OF APPLICATION: DATE OF MEETING: ZONING FILE: 13-3591 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 12 March 2013 COPIES via Bill Coffman Email: Bob Molstad Ervin Wachman Subdivision, Preliminary Plat 11 March 2013 VOTE: 4 FOR 0 AGAINST Motion: To approve per the findings and conditions of the preliminary plat resolution in the Council packet and previously mailed to you. Please arrange to sign the original resolution at the City Offices (Monday through Friday 8 -4:30). **All persons with an interest in the property must sign the resolutions . Submittal of a complete Final Plat application and all required submittals as outlined within the Preliminary Plat resolution shall be at le ast 4 weeks prior to the desired City Council meeting date . Upcoming Council meetings are as follows: Monday, April 22"d Monday, May 13th TUESDAY, May, 28th Monday, June 1 0th If you desire certified copie s of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. If you have questions plea se conta ct Melanie Curti s, Planning & Zoning Coordinator, at mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us or 952.249 .4627. C: 0 -<tS (.) -.0 ::J a. -0 ~ > <tS "'C --<( C ·15.. C: (l) C C (l) I 0 >, c ::, 0 0 ci 0 Cf) (l) C C ~ 0 (]} ro u5 Cl) Q) I _!_ >, .c: 0 3: Cll --0 Cf).._ 0... C £ow.!<: Cll ~I= 0»1-.2 C: .Q (/) (/) .. 00.(ljctl:S: c:Ec.c:.2 ,__ (l) > -0 (]} O-o>c.O ~cgcu-o (/) Cll .!<'. -2 »-ro ro -c._.-....., ::, (]} (]} 0 Cf) -orno.fil<D Ol Cll Cll C ~ c-aO.c ·-(]} (/) ·-.c: ~ N 3: ~ .S2 ·-(]} .c: c-ocai3: 0 £ (]} ~ (/) Cf)::,.C:_J- © Cll -~ U C .._ O>~ C Cll O C (]} ~ -~ Q) ..:l £ a..(l)-5ia:o .c: .c: := (l) '~ro.o~rn ~ £ 5.z ~ LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Orono Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Orono Council Cham- bers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on TUESDAY, February 19, 2013 , beginn ing at 6:30 p.m. on the matter of reviewing the following land use applications: 12-3585: Spring Hill Gott Course, 725 Sixth Avenue North, RR-1 B zoning district, re- quests a conditional use permit for wetland alteration in order to fill a portion of a wet- land on the property." , 13-3591 : Ervin Wachman, Outlot C, Bay- view Farms 2nd Addition (PIO 06-117-23- 22 -0018)1 RR-1 B zoning district, requests preliminary plat approval in order to create five (5) new, 2+ acre residential lots. 13-3592: Brian & Judith Buttertield, 3955 ' -0 (]} U) (]} (]} -Cll -~ ~::, ::i=roui rr Cll -3: ~ ::, (/) Cll <D rr Cll - £ Cll c5!l! =(/)U>.o Cll Cll (]} l3 .C C ·-:=: U> co_ ui .!<'. :Q (]} Cll C) U) C: ...... 0 0 -0 (l) U) (]} (]} C: .c: 3: E -~ <D ::, :0 > o :::i "ui (.) 0.. (/) (l) (]} -0 C) .c C: (.) -C1l::, Watertown Road , RR-1A zoning district, request a lot area variance in order to construct a new single family home on a lot 1.43 acres in area where 5 acre s is re- quired; a front setbac k variance allowing a 50 foot setback from the front prope rty line/ edge of ROW where a 100 fo ot setbac k is required; and a rear yard setbac k variance allowing the house to be set back 7 4 feet and the deck 68 fe el from !lie rea r where a 1 OQ.fQOMe\P?C~-i~;r~qw[Jld~,,,,,,;~. . • . t , 13-3593 : Peter Esk uche on behalf of Nancy Bigos, 3350 Fox Street, LR-1A zoning dis- trict, requests an average setback variance in order to construct a new. in-ground pool ahead of the average lakeshore setback line. 13-3594: Steiner+ Koppelman on beha lf of Nancy Bigos, 3350 Fox Street, LR-1 A zo ning district, requests a conditional use permit to allow the installati on of a bathtub/shower within an accessory structure. ~l i 0 -0 C\J Q) . .c: (/) ~l 0 C\J 13 -3596 : City of Orono will consi der amendments to Orono Zoning Code Chapter 78 rega rding accessory structures and uses withi n the R residential districts . All person s wishing to be heard are encour- aged to attend these meeti ngs. Thi s is not a final agenda and is subjec t to change prior, to the hearings . Writte n comme nts are ac- cepted and should be submitted to the City of Orono by February 11 , 2013 if possible. Interested persons may review the applica- tions at City off ices. For an appointment, please call (952) 249-4620. City of Orono By: Pla nning Commi ssion Melanie Curtis Pla nning & Zo ning Coord inator (Published in The Lilker and The Pioneer newspapers February 2, 2013) \ ~ c (l) OJ <( -0 (l) N 15 -;;:. ::, C1l . ,... \~ ~ "§ .c: :i <( >, C1l 0. -e -0 ~ C C1l 3: C ·-0. -a.<2~ ro Q) cti ~ ._ <=u.o© a.·-.c E ~ -o o o ro © (.) ::, -0 -0 <JJ er·;; c: co o ro .C0>1-_ <ii '.2 a.~ a. ::, (/) . CO:=: CO<( E (/) e-OH ...... - -C: ::s ·;:: (.) a. ~ <J) 3: 3: -0 -0 (l) C: -e ::::, cii (/) -0 (l) .c -~ :0 ::::, a. C1l Cf) - -0 Ol (LJ 2-~li:_ C -0 ·;:: :J o.c3 ,__ C (]} ·- 0 ~ -g 0 >, (l) co >, co ,__ co -o(l)O -0 \1 "\ .\ o.--u,u,._:r.0 3;:C:(])r.0 (])OO.--ci cUcoC\Ja> (l) (/) o.~-o .c:-<JJ<(C I-<DC 3: ..-E(l) ---:-(]} (0 <(Ecr.0co -0 Q) .1; a. (]} .c I- co -5 Cll 0 ro -...... ::: ID ~ co a.(]} (/) Cll <I> ·-a. 3: .c: U) .c g 3: C) .c: (l) Cll 3: C (l) .c: -i ~lit~, ~ (l)-gcil :: £co(!) <I> £ ~ .... -~-~~1''.;.·n,_ V -~ i z <("'" ' tu r -• er.> o R ~z ffi _. .. w z r:e:-.... • I-z . !(/)~:~ ) re I ~ , <( 0 . '(.).:::;$, • c::) (L1 , cc ii: E :<(>-~- ~ a:: C :G':~C) ' 0 o .?:· ~z z~ ~ 4~~ '$;"':'11~1:::~. ) ;-.f t ,. ~~ ,,1i 1 .~\ I ! J;? I ··~t1l-~~-,r . ~~; t-,i .~c~#!l..,.~: r., E 0 .. O O .C ... lf? 0 0 l() C: -·- (/) ~ ... (,9 CJ ..: a. ~go ~ ~ t;: $ ::, ~ Cl>t:U) C CJ >CJ •• 0 E O ~ ~ ·-E .o "' CJ iii o ~E::: E O O Cl) CJ ... ~ 'i~-~ .S-c-'=~~; c ·;;;g>-... u -a.·-.0 0 CJ e1>goi-g:;;; (0~~:::8,-.;; a:-ol().2:ag -~ LO "m ~:;:: :: -Q) (.) ·- (/J {h ->.~ :Q)f~co o~E::>.c iii a. E::, o 1;l CJ"' "'w ::: ~ ·; ! 0 .0 "' "' ..J e==a: -m--.::, a.~t?.. C: 0 -m 0 .c :::, a. -0 .:t:: > ro "C --<( C ·o.. C Q) C C Q) I 0 >, E ::J 0 0 ci 0 en Q) C C ~ 0 Q) rn if) en OJ 0:: OJ ~-5w:S en-~-o <( 0 -5Q)..J(l) ~tw.gi c _QI (I) OO.l-3: -E en o C (I) Cll c 0 -0 C _:,,: :S: C :S: = en rn o ::i c--2' E x en ::J Q) .... C1l :s: -ocn(l).co cnrno.. ai c-og_-g.o "ii> ~ en C1l -a .0 ·;:: :s: -2 -0 (I) C1l C1l §-5cou5 en::iOJ~a> (D<tSf:c:~ -oc-crn C Cll O ·-.C <( en .... ~ -~ • ·-(I) -.c 0..QJ.c-o:;:: .c ~ 3 ~ .0 0 () r. ~ cO ~ -5 R~$ • "O (I) V) Q) (I) -Ill ._ ·-:l ·s := cti (I) CTro-3: ~ ::J (I) Ill OJc,rn- £ cc O ~ =enen~ C1l cc (I) u .C C = ;=: en C o_ :S: C ·-0. -0 -~ ~ Ill (i)[U>,'- =u.oa> o.._ ..c E::::-oo 0 Cll OJ U::i-O-O en CT 0 ;> C ro o ro .cm,.__ '-C O..t-- Q) ·.;:: 0 o. ::i en . g_~C'tl'.:f LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Orono Planning Commission will hold a · public hearing in the Orono Council Cham- bers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on TUESDAY, February 19, 2013, beginning at 6:30 p.m. on the matter of reviewing the following land use app lications: 12-3585: Spring Hill Golf Course, 725 Sixth Avenue North , RR-1 B zoning district, re - quests a conditional use permit for wetland alteration in order to fi ll a portion of a we1- land on the property. 13-3591: Ervin Wachman, Outlot C, Bay- view Farms 2nd Addition (PIO 06-117-23- 22-0018), RR -1 B zon ing district, requests preliminary plat approval in order to create five (5) new, 2+ acre residential lots. 13-3592: Brian & Judith Butterfield, 3955 "O Q) E I C (_ d Qj ~ 0 :-Q Q) Cll t) en C _o en -"' 0 -0 Q) en OJ a> Cr. :S: E -~ (I) ::J :0 > 0 ::J ·u5 u o. en Q) Q) -0 () .C C U -Cll ::J E en e"OH :: C =1 ·c () 0. en Cll Cll :s: :s: "O "O Q) C -5 Cll 0 U) Cl) ._-Ci ;s:ca>C'J (I) 0 0. --c:i cUroC\JOJ (I) en o.~-a .c-en<(C 1-C:s;,-OJ --:-OJ OJ (') E <(ECC'JCll ·;:: 0. Q) .c 1-,...... (l) Cll ---._ X ro ~ Q) CJ) Cll Q) ·-0. :s: r. en r. -~ 5 () .c Q) Cll :S: C Q) Watertow n Road, RR-1A zon ing district , request a lot area varian ce in order to construct a new single fam ily home on a lot 1 .43 acres in area where 5 acres is re- quired ; a front setback va riance allowing a 50 foot setback from the front property lin e/ edge of ROW whe re a 100 foot setback is required ; and a rear yard setback va riance allowing the house to be set back 7 4 feet and the deck 68 feet from the rear where a 100 foot setback is required . 13 -3593 : Peter Eskuche on behatt of Nancy Bigos, 3350 Fox St reet, LR-1 A zoning dis- trict, requests an average set back variance in order to construct a new, in-ground pool ahead of the ave rage lakeshore setback line. 13-3594: Steine r + Koppelman on behalf of Nancy Bigos, 3350 Fox Street, LR-1A zoning district, requests a conditional use pe rmit to allow the installation of a bathtub/sh ower within an accessory structure. (')-, [ .-Q) 0 "O C\J Q) .c .!!2 :0 ~ :::i ro 0.. "O ..._ ~___£)! Cll ' n .,-g ~ "2 ::J rn (/) '+-' Cll (/) Li_ ~.5 l ·-"O .... :;J o..-.... g ~l 0 N -0 Q) r. -~ :0 -Q) ·-0.:::: u ->, Cll C 0 Cll !I: C1l >, --oOJO Cll ::J 0. en ,.c--o ~ ~ii~ Cll :s: "2 :s: Q)-o2 == r. C Cll -Cll (I) (I) -5 13-3596: City of Orono will consider amendments to Orono Zoning Code Chapter 78 regardi ng accessory st ructu res and uses within th e R resident ial districts. All persons wishing to be heard are encou r- aged to attend these meetings. This is not a final agenda and is subject to change prior to the hearings. Written comme nts are ac- cepted and shou ld be submitted to the City of Orono by February 11, 2013 if possible. Interested persons may review the applica- tions at City offices. For an appointme nt, please call (952 ) 249-4620. City of Orono By: Planning Commission Melanie Curtis Planning & Zo ning Coordinator (Published in The Laker and The Pioneer newspapers February 2, 2013) c Q) en <( -0 Q) N ·;:: 0 .c :i <( 0 "O >, ~ 2'-.i ::J (I) >, en I~· ._ ;~~·\ -w ;-.;: --t z (()~~:, Cl, z w ·" ;i LU z ~ < I-z "'. :'. &? ~ g : ;<t o:-· ?o::;o. ; ,ml!1 ~ u: ~ E , <I:>-~ -~ ~ cc g ·, a:i!o • 0 o >-z z ~ ~::f''w5..~ ,· '1<.S ,/l{j,J";°;'.:;,.,, . t f rM\\ '~\~d; \:;.., ;/ ~-~-~="-'" ' _;; :_;;y ~ .. ~: .-.,. '{, .... ,-; e 0 0 c:i .s: l() 0 ~ • C: 0 l() ·--.,.. ~ U) <ii U) ::, (I} Cl) i.: CL Cl) 0 . ::: a) 0 "' ·~ ] E In ori ~ Q) i..: ~ C: Cl) ~ .l!! ~ O E .o 1ii Cl> :;:; E !': E ;: ra 8 -2~~ E >, ;: O'in o~.c!'l~fil ..... ·-0 > ... (.) .E a.·= .c .E g C1) Cllcj-g-olJl +-'(Oa.~~ci ctS ""'O O"" C a: -g~=;~E ·-l() 0 ·-~<ii!~~ u, .. .._-ca !'l2lE~.c 0 a, -O .;g.E~~ Cl) ·-Cl) s: Cl)>< - 0 :0 "' "' -I (ti ::E a: -~NM .!:, c..-- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. ) CITY OF ORONO ) CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I, Monica Fadness, of the City of Orono , Hennepin County , Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #13-3591 was mailed to the attached list of property owners. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 81h day of February , 2013. ~~a.~ Monica A. Fadness CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616 NOTICE The Orono Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Orono Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on TUESDAY, February 19, 2013, beginning at 6:30 p.m. on the matter of reviewing the following land use applications: 12-3585 Spring Hill Golf Course, 725 Sixth Avenue North, RR-18 zoning district, requests a conditional use permit for wetland alteration in order to fill a portion of a wetland on the property. 13-3--S91 Ervin Wachman , Outlot C, Bayview Farms 2nd Addition (PIO 06-117-23-22-0018), RR-1 B zoning district, requests preliminary plat approval in order to create five (5) new, 2+ acre residential lots. 13-3592 Brian & Judith Butterfield, 3955 Watertown Road, RR-1A zoning district, request a lot area variance in order to construct a new single family home on a lot 1.43 acres in area where 5 acres is required; a front setback variance allowing a 50 foot setback from the front property line/edge of ROW where a 100 foot setback is required ; and a rear yard setback variance allowing the house to be set back 7 4 feet and the deck 68 feet from the rear where a 100 foot setback is required. 13-3593 Peter Eskuche on behalf of Nancy Bigos, 3350 Fox Street, LR-1A zoning district, requests an average setback variance in order to construct a new, in-ground pool ahead of the average lakeshore setback line . 13-3594 Steiner + Koppelman on behalf of Nancy Bigos, 3350 Fox Street, LR-1A zoning district, requests a conditional use permit to allow the installation of a bathtub/shower within an accessory structure . 13-3596 City of Orono will consider amendments to Orono Zoning Code Chapter 78 regarding accessory structures and uses within the R residential districts. All persons wishing to be heard are encouraged to attend these meetings. This is not a final agenda and is subject to change prior to the hearings. Written comments are accepted and should be submitted to the City of Orono by February 11 , 2013 if possible. Interested persons may review the applications at City offices. For an appointment, please call (952) 249-4620. City of Orono By: Plannin~g Commission ~ Melanie Curtis Planning & Zoning Coordinator To be published in The Laker & The Pioneer Newspapers on February 2, 2013. Posted at: Orono City Offices Crystal Bay Post Office Long Lake Post Office Navarre Post Office •• RUN DATE: 1/11/2013 38 06-117-23 21 0005 P & S RENNEBOHM 4565 BAYSIDE RD PETER & SHARON RENNEBOHM 4565 BAYSIDE ROAD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-117-23 22 00 12 ERVIN A WACH MAN JR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED CITY OF ORONO POBOX66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 06-1 I 7-23 22 0018 ERVIN A WACHMAN JR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ERVIN A WACHMAN JR 2135SALEMCT LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 06-117-23 22 0021 RESI WHOLE LOAN II LLC 4755 BAYSIDE RD AMERJCAN HOME MTG SERV INC 4875 BELFORT RD SUITE 130 JACKSONVJLLE FL 32256 38 06-11 7-23 22 0024 ERIN SULLIVAN 180 NORTH SHORE DR W ERIN SULLIVAN 180 NORTH SHORE DR W MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-11 7-23 23 0019 J P THULL & P E THULL 270 NORTH SHORE DR W JEFFREY P THULL PATRICIA E THULL 210 NORTH SHORE DR W MOUND MN 55364 38 3 1-118-23330005 B& NCUFF 4660 BAYS IDE RD BRIDGETTE CUFF 4660 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY I NFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: l 38 06-117-23 22 0009 ERIC P SIMS/ELIZABETH I SIMS 4645 BAYSIDE RD ERIC P SIMS/ELIZABETH I SIMS 4645 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-117-23 220014 ERVIN A WACHMAN JR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED CITY OF ORONO PO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 06-117-23 22 0019 EVAN R MELINE 4775 BAYSIDE RD EVAN R MELINE 4775 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-1 I 7-23 22 0022 J W MORGAN JR & D G PULFORD 4725 BAYSIDE RD JAMES MORGAi'I & DEBRA PU LFORD 4725 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-117-23 22 0025 J MORGAN & D PUL FORD ET AL 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED JAMES MORGAN & DEBRA PULFORD 4725 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-117-23 23 002 I CA ARMSTRONG PASS/BJ PASS 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED BRADLEY J PAS S 2536 18THAVES MPLS MN 55404 38 3 1-11 8-23 33 0007 ROSEMARY C IVERSEN 4740 BAYSIDE RD ROSEMARY C IVER SEN 2835 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 553915359 59 38 06-117-23 220011 IT & M LGEFFRE 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED IRVIN T & MARJORJE L GEFFRE 4665 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-117-23 22 0017 IT & M LGEFFRE 4665 BAYSIDE RD IRVIN & MARJORIE GEFFRE 4665 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-117-23 22 0020 PETER MEYERS/CAROLYN MEYERS 70 NORTH SHORE DR W PETER MEYERS CAROLYN MEYERS PO BOX 15 7 MAPL E PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-117-23 220023 S D & J A DZUBA Y 150 NORTH SHORE DR W STEVEN D & JULIE A DZUBAY l SO NORTH SHORE DR W MAPLE PLAlN MN 55359 38 06-1 17-23 23 0018 J P THULL & P E THULL 21 0 NORTH SHORE DR W JEFFREY P T HULL PATRICIA E T HULL 2 10NORTH SHORE DR W MOUND MN 55364 38 06-117-23 24 0001 BRADLEY J PASS 215 NORTH ARM LA BRADLEY PASS 2536 18TH AVES MPLS MN 55 404 38 31-1 18-23 33 0009 PAINTERS CREEK HOMEOWN ERS 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED PAINTERS CREEK HOMEOWNERS C/0 SHANNON BURGE R 165 LUCE LINE RIDGE ORONO MN 55359 RECEIVED JAN 2 3 201 3 CITY OF ORONO RUN DATE: 1/11/2013 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 2 38 31-118-23 33 0011 BR LANGE & J B BURRELL 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED BRUCE R LANGE POBOX48 NEWKENT VA 23 124 38 31-118-23340003 JOHN R HENDRICKSON ET AL 25 LUCE LTNE RIDGE JOHN R HENDRJCKSON 25 LUCE LINE RIDGE MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESEN AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE 0 38 31-118-23 33 0014 MICHAEL D SLETTEN 4680 BAYSIDE RD MICHAEL D SLETTEN 4680 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 DATE : J.Ahl 1 1 ·1nn sv:.,--J'---.1.4,~~-~L--'1=---'--"- DEPARTMENT. 59 38 31-118-23 33 0015 B PETER & CHRISTINE A CHEY 4720 BAYSIDE RD B PETER & CHRISTINE ACHEY 4720 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 RECEIVED JAN "f3 2013 CITY OF ORONO SATHRE-BERGQUIST 1 INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY, WAYZATA, MINNESOTA, 55391 (952) 476-6000 FAX (952) 476-0104 February 15, 2013 RE: Preliminary Plat Application 13-3591 (S-B Responses) Ba yside Meadows (formerly Outlot C, Bayview Farms 2nd Addition) Engineering Review #1 02-7 -13 1.0 GENERAL: 1.1 A legend, defining significant features and lines, should be included on each plan to aid in reading plan sheets.Response: A legend has been added and additional notes have been added to the plans. 1.2 The benchmark should be labeled on all plans.Response: A few benchmarks have been added to the plans. 1.3 Drainage calculations for the proposed stormwater pond currently meet City requirements. Proposed runoff rates will be restricted to less than existing runoff rates. However, plan revisions may affect peak discharge rates. Therefore, a Final Stormwater Management Plan should be submitted with the Final Construction Plans. Also, an outlet control structure detail should be included with the Final Plans. Response : An updated stormwater management plan will be submitted with the final plat application . The final construction plans will have the storm sewer profiles in cluded. 1.4 Drainage calculations must be submitted as part of the Final Plans to confirm sizing of all culverts. Response: Drainage area and storm sewer sizing computation will be completed with the fmal plans. 1.5 As part of the Final Plans, Drainage and Utility easements must be placed over the wetland, wetland buffer, stormwater pond, and all ditching and culverts directing runoff to the pond or wetland. The easements should be shown on the Final Plat and Final Street, Utility, and Grading Plans. Response: The required easements will be shown on the final plans. 1.6 The estimated cost of proposed street and utility improvements must be submitted as part of the Final Plat process for determination of the total Letter of Credit amount. A Letter of Credit written to 150% of cost of improvements must be submitted prior to any land disturbing activities. Response: A construction cost estimate will be provided with the final plat application. 1. 7 New development triggers the wetland protection ordinance requirements. Therefore, the following should be considered: a. This wetland is listed as a "management 2" wetland in the MCWD's Functional Assessment of Wetlands inventory, which requires a 25 foot buffer and 20 foot structure setback. The proposed buffer exceeds and the setback meets City requirements. Response: The buffer and setback are per the data provided by the Watershed and City, please verify that 25 ft and 20 feet are adequate for both the watershed and the City and we will revise them on the final plans. b. The Wetland Delineation Report lists Canada Thistle, which is considered to be an invasive species, and should be listed for control in the Vegetation Management Plan. Response: The thistle has been addressed in the revised management plan. c. Wetland Buffer markers should be placed at the upland boundary of the buffer edge located at lot lines and changes of buffer edge direction and spaced a maximum 200 feet apart. Response: The proposed buffer monuments are shown on the plans. d. Estimated landscaping costs for vegetation management and buffer establishment will need to be submitted for determination of total Letter of Credit amount as part of the Final Plat process. Response: The landscaping costs will be provided with the final plat application. 1.8 Septic reports indicating suitable primary and alternate sites for on-site sewage treatment systems must be submitted for review and approval. Response: The reports were submitted with the original application. 1.9 The Conservation Master Design Report should be revised to begin removal of invasive species at time of rough grading, instead of relying on the landowners who purchase the lots. The Home Owner Association documents should also include requirements and procedures for invasive species removal. Response: The removal of invasive species will begin with the site grading work, additional removal maybe necessary with the final lot landscaping work. 1.10 Proposed well locations should be shown on the Final Plans. Wells must be setback 3 feet minimum from structures and 50 feet minimum from septic systems. Response: Possible well location have been added to each lot. 1.11 Payment of park dedication fees must be submitted to the City prior to Final Plat approval. -Ok 1.12 The Home Owners Agreement (HOA) documents should be submitted for review. The following items should be included: a. Road Maintenance Plan b . Pond Maintenance Plan c. Monument Maintenance Plan d. Invasive Species Control Response: The HOA documents will address the requested items. 1.13 The applicant will be required to obtain Hennepin County approval and permitting for connection to County Road 84 and installation of the culvert in County Right-Of-Way. A copy of any approvals or permits required should be submitted prior to Final Plat Approval. Response: The Hennepin County access permit will be obtained prior to any permanent improvements. 1.14 The applicant will be required to obtain Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) approval and permitting for erosion control. A copy of any approvals or permits required should be submitted prior to Final Plat approval. Since the development is proposing less than 20% impervious surface, no stormwater management permitting from MCWD should be required. Response: The final plans will be submitted to the watershed for the required ero sion control review prior to any site grading activities. 2.1 SITE PLAN: 2.2 Per the City of Orono's Resolution No. 3492 approving the plat of Bayview Farms 2rx1 Addition and the agreement between Owners, the driveway location for 4665 Bayside Road must be revised onto the private road and the access to Bayside Road roust be eliminated. Response: Mr. Geffre has been in contact with the City. 2.3 Protection fencing should be installed around potential septic areas to ensure they are not impacted by construction. The protection fencing locations should be inspected and approved by the City Engineer prior to any land disturbing activities. Response: Silt fence and/or tree fence will be installed prior to any site grad ing activities, as shown on the plan set. 3.1 PRELIMINARY PLAT: 3 .2 Outlot A of Bayview Farms 2rx1 Addition should be combined with Lot 1 Block 1. Response: Outlot A is not part of the proposed proj ect. 3 .3 Lot 1 Block 1 of Bayview Farms 2nd Addition was combined with the small lot shown on the southwest corner containing the existing shed and the easements were vacated accordingly. The plat should be revised to correctly depict the lot lines and easements. Response: The lot line was removed from the construction plans, but we do not have title wo rk on the adjoining parcels to verify the combination of the parcels. 3.4 Two variances will be required for the proposed plat: a. The length of the cul-de-sac (1068') exceeds the maximum allowed (1000'). Response: The eds was shortened a few feet with the radius changes, please refer to the revised plans. b . The radius of the proposed road centerline is less than the required minimum 275' in two locations. The radius is proposed to be 100' at approximate station 4+00 and 250' at approximate station 9+00. Response: The street alignment has been revised to meet the 275' radius requirements. 3.5 The Conservation Master Design Report memorandum indicates conservation easements should be placed over the tree stands located in the southeast comer of the site and along the west property line. It also indicates that a conservation easement should be placed over the sloping grassland located north of the existing wetland. These easements are shown on the Site Conservation Plan and should be recorded with the Final Plat process. Response: The easements will be prepared and recorded with the final plat. 3 .6 Outlot A requires a road and utilities easement over the entire area. The easement should be generated using the standard city form and recorded as part of the Final Plat process. Response: The outlot easement documents will be prepared for recording with the final plat. 4 .1 GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN: 4 .2 Riprap should be placed on the downstream end of all culverts for energy dissipation. -Response: Riprap has been added to the downstream aprons within the site, but not along the county road. 4.3 A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will need to be submitted as part of the Final Plans. The SWPPP should include a project narrative, erosion control notes, erosion control installation schedule, erosion control maintenance schedule, pollution prevention notes, location and details of proposed erosion control devices. Response: A SWPPP will be prepared and an NPDES permit will be obtained, prior to any site grading activities. 4.4 Grading for road construction is proposed onto Lot 1 Block 1 and Lot 1 Block 2 of Bayview Farms 2nd Addition. Construction easements should be obtained from each lot owner for this work and submitted to the City for review. Response: Temporary construction easements or right of entry will be obtained prior to any grading activities on the adjacent parcels. 4 .5 A legend defining or notes labeling proposed erosion control devices should be added to confirm adequate erosion control will be provided. Response: A legend has been added to the plans, the final erosion control plan will have additional notes and details. 5.1 PRELIMINARY STREET PLAN: 5.2 The proposed street section design meets the recommendations outlined in the Geotechnical Report and City standards. -Ok 5 .3 A minimum paved width of 24' is required for private roads per City code. The plans currently propose a width of 20'. Therefore, the plans must be revised to meet City requirements. Response: The street width has been revised to be 24 feet in width. 5.4 The proposed vertical curve at station 7+50 does not meet required standards. Per the State Aid Manual for Sag Vertical Curves, a minimum K value equal to 36 is required for the 30 mph design, and a K value equal to 35.79 is proposed. The profile should be revised to meet minimum standards. Response: The revised street profile meets the 30 mph k-values. 5.5 The vertical profile is extremely steep at the location of the proposed 100' radius horizontal curve (approximate station 4+o0). The combination of steep slope and tight curve could create safety concerns during snowy or icy conditions. The applicant should consider modifying the road layout to lessen the slope and increase the radius. Response: The street alignment has been modified to meet the 275' radius requirements and the street grades are within the allowable range, per the city code. 6.1 PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN: 6.2 Tree calculations should be shown on the Planting Plan. One shade tree is required for every 40' of road frontage . Response: The final planting plan will provide the requested tree calculations. 6 .3 T ree preservation and removal should be included with the Planting Plan so the e xtent o f tree clearing can be field verified. Response : With the completion of the final grading plan, we will p rovide a d e tai led tre e c learing pl a n for the con st ru c tion pro cess and some pot ential c lear in g areas for the possible home sites within the treed area of the project. End of Comments Please let me know if there are any additional items we need to address prior to the PC meeting on Tuesday night. Also, please send the revised plans back to the fire marshal for a second review. We have revised the curves and the street width and the amount of pavement within the cul-de-sac, but wish to keep the landscaped island. Sincerely, Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. Robert S. Molstad, PE President LOT LINE BUILDING SETBACK BOUNDARY PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS R IGHT-OF-WAY F LARED ENO SECT ION WIRIP-RAP STORM STUCTURE LABEL WEU SE PTIC SITE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SWALE ...J «: I ----• DESIGNOATA: STREET SECTION: E ' OWNER: PETER & SHARON RENNEBOHM PID #-0611723210005 .,, .,, < .,, ;j ~ .... i. .,, ~"' ,:; pi <.: ~ Eie "' ~i N "' ~. 0:, w ::::; ~ 0 0 ~· '-----..- . lo I ~ r w I OWNER: JAM ES MORGAN & DEBRA PULFORD PIDfl-0611723220022 SITE DATA: • --· __ ...--' ..- OWNER: I .. lsi I OWNER: JAMES & JULIE DZUB AY PID #-0611723220023 SOIL BORI NG LOCATION • 1.s• SPWEBZ408 WEAR COURSE (MN DOT ZJ60) z.s· SPNWBZ308 BASE COURSE (MN DOT 2360) 8" CL 5 AGGREGATE BASE (~IN DOT 3138) SUBGRADE FABRIC (8 OZ/SY, NON-WOVEN) (i ,equ.,ed) ZONING: RR-16 MIN LOT AREA: 2.0 AC MIN L OT WIDTH: 200 FT AMERICAN HOME MOR TGAGE PIOfl-061 1723220021 BENCHMARK I FOUND IP PRE CONSTRUCTION Sil T FENCE POST CONSTRUCTION Sil T FlcNCE SEPTIC PROTECTION FENCING WCIOOFIBER BLANKET DITCH CHECKS UTILITY POLE 6" (Z' wkJe) CL 7 AGGREGATE SHOULDER CROSS SECTION: 3%CROWN 10' P AVEMEN T WIDTH z· AGGRE GATE SHOULDER 3:1 DITCH SLOPE 'l: TYPICAL DITCH DEPTH J' TYPICAL DITCH WIDTH INST1'.LL CULVERTS FOR EACH DRI VE WAY WlTH HO"-IE CONSTRUCTION t---"-DE",s,,,1G,cN;'-E_R_+N-,Oc'.-t--::B::,Y+-co':'-A"-TE=,-1------','R",EV1;.;.S::.:IONS='-----USE (INCLUDING COPYING. DISTRIBUTION. ANOIOR CONVEYANCE OF RSM 1 RSM 02-1 M3 _Lo1 .u,!9 Re11hk~":.~~ ~~s INFORMATION) OF THIS PROOUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WlTHO.JT 2 RSM -r· 02:·ts-u -Sile I.JI~ P8f C1t1 Commenll SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT . I -----SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES ,'.N lllEGITiMATE USE ANO SHAU THEREBY -• INOEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGOUISl, INC. OF All RESPON SIBILITY. . :I_· -. SAlHRE-BERGOUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR O""AGES OR L OSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEC ITMATE use. . DATE DRAWN BY RSM CHECKED BY 0 1-15-13 FYSB ·SOFT SYSB-30FT SYSB STRl -SO FT RYSO. SOFT •• MAX COS LENGTH . 1000 FT ••• MIN CURVE 275 Fl 50 ZS ZS SO SCALE IN FEET I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNOER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIOI> ANO THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. lie. No. i-4'::cJ...t 100 SATHRE-BERGQU IST . I NC . 150 SOUTH BROAOYIAY WAYZATA. MN . 5539 1 (952) 476-6000 ( I'" ~ I ERVIN WACHMAN 2135 Salem Court Long l ake, M4nnesota 55365 .~ h r Willi"" COFFMAN OWNER : BRADLEY PASS PID#-0611723240001 0 ..J "O ~ ., > 0 u '\ I j O OWNER : --_ _, ERIN SULLIVAN PID l/-0611723220024 SHEET IND EX T A BLE Sheet I Description I SP Preliminary Site Plan I EX I ExistinQ Co nditions Plan I AA I Alta Survev I pp I Preliminary Plat V) V) <( a. I I I I CoffnJa't Ocvdormatt Scn"K'l.'S. lnc. Ct!llul:w 6 12-!02-0691 t.m:111 :bilkoffman@cbbumtt com I GP I Preli minary Gradino & Erosio n Control Plan I CITY PROJECT NO. ORONO, M INN ESOTA I I I ST I Preliminarv Street Plan & Profile LS I Landscaoino Plans Aerial I Aeria l -500' Setba ck Pla n PRELIMINARY S ITE PLAN BAYSIDE MEADOWS I I I FILE NO. 31202--070 SP SP I I I I I I I I I -,,. - I ~,, r, I --:;: :....- I --:: -- I -:r ~, C 7 a:: u C < ,-._ .__. U1 I ~ ::..- er--- §I 7 - ~ z ,..., ~, .__. ~ - I I I I SYMBOL LEGEND LOT LINE 8UILOING SETBACK BOUNDARY PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE t------------t------il ' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS t RIGHT-elf-WAY FLARED ENO SECTION W/RIP-RAP <9 I STORM STUCTURE LABEL WELL QJ Cf --e SEPTIC SITE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SWALE [:9 I SOIL BORING LOCATION 0 I BENCHMARK / FOUND IP • PRE CONSTRUCTION SILT F ENCE --- ' "' --- OWNER: PETER & SHARON RENNEBOHM PIDN-0611723210005 ,-------.-... ~I OWNER: JAMES MORGAN & DEBR A P ULFORD PIDN -0611723220022 , ;i ~ ) .. .,! ~ I ""· f/ , t~,' /. 0 '·· I'~ 0 OWNER : . ' -~ I I I I I I I O'NNER: 0 JAMES & JULIE DZUB AY PIDN-061172 3220023 POST CONSTRUCTION S ILT FENICE --- SEPTIC PROTECTION F ENCING -, -I AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE PIDN-0611723220021 WOOOFIBER BLANKET DITCH CHECKS UTI LITY POLE DESIGNER RSM DRAWN BY RSM CHECKED BY """ I DATE I 01-15-1 3 I C....CC-'----+-N-'--0._I--IB_Y -lli--=D'-'"T.:.:E-t------'-'R-"-EV'-'-IS'-'"ION"'--"S------1 USE (INCLUDING COPYING. 01STRl8UTION, ANO/OR CONVEYANCE OF I I .. INFORMATION) OF THIS PROOUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT -.1 ·-_· 1--.. , -· .. -· .. SATHRE.BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATK)N, USE WITHOUT -SAID AUTHORIZATION CON STITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE ANO SHALL THEREBY I -· INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. -SATHRE,BERGOUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEQTiw.TE I . .. USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING I i -F ROM ILLEGITM ... TE USE. 502502550 100 SCALE IN FEET I HEREBY CERTIFY TH"T THIS PLAN OR SPECIFIC.o.TIONW"S PREPARED BY ME OR LINDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I A M A DULY REGISTE RED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAW S OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. RObe<I S. Moist~, P.E. Oa1e: Ol/!d..D. uc. No. :iJ.':o-1 SA TH RE -BERGQU IST . INC . 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA , MN, 55391 (952) 476-6000 OWNER: BRADLEY PASS PIDN-0611723240001 C ITY PROJECT NO. I ORONO, MINNESOTA i ~ " :,i .. ! a ~ t OWNER: ERIN SUL LIVAN PIDN-0611723220024 -- E XISTING CONDITIONS PLAN WACHM AN PARCEL I I I I I I I I I I I I I VJ VJ < Cl. -; criN 0 "1:10 P") VJN .• VJ P") f!J<N ~Cl.~ Oc.,<D z o 01 ~"" VJ9 ::;Cl. er < -,i_ u F k.ENO. 31202-070 % 50 25 0 25 50 SCALE IN FEET I I I I I ~, a:: 01 V) I §I z ~, 100 I I I SYMBOL LEGEND LOT LINE BUILOING SETBACK BOUNDARY PARCELBOUNDARYLINE DRAINAGE A ND UTILITY EASEMENTS RIGHT -OF-WAY LCW ~ flEV •91't.A4 l OWl'OlffT S U ,•a•l'Olf P\IISTA•l•,J ,..,.E:LE\1'•~72.U I I \~ '· I ' ,, / I {--\ '- \ \o { '. • 'l, ~ "-, :. \. F LARED END SECTION W/RIP-RAP (9 CJ e ~» ~ • STORM STUCTURE LABEL WELL SEPTIC SITE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SWALE SOIL BORING LOCATION I :--' ___ .,,...,,e-------,,1 BENCHMARK/ FOU ND IP PRE CONSTRUCTION SILT FENCE ---~ POST CONSTRUCTION SILT FENCE ---~ SEPTIC PROTECTION FENCING WOODFIBER BLANKET "-'- DITCH CHECKS ~ UTILITY POLE <Q.., ; ~ i ; s i j ~ PROFIUE SCALE ..... 1•00 ''" MO 60 30 0 30 60 120 SCALE IN FEET DESIGNER RSM NO. I BY I DATE REVISIONS 2 I RSM I 02·15-13 Sile u,,0..1 '* c11, Co,rwne,\tl USE (INCUJOfNG COPYING, OISTR18UTION. ANO/OR C0,,.'1/EYIJ<CE OF ~',,-l-:~=c-+---=:::::~~;;;;:==----INFORMATION) OF THIS PROOUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED w m lOUT . -. I" . DRAW N BY RSM -I : . I : - CHECKED BY I I -- XU DATE i I -01-15-13 I ... -.. . -· --. - -- SATHRE-BERGQUI ST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITIEN AUTHORIZATION. USE W1THOUT • • ·-SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE ANO SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-B ERGOUIST. INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBIUT'f. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES T HE RIGHT TO HOtDANY ILLEGITIMATE -1 USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR D AMAGES OR L OSSES RESULTING . FROM ILLE GITMATE USE. i ; e i i ; 1•00 .... .. .. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION V/"S PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I "MA OULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL E NG INEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STAT E OF MINNESOTA. ~~;' ~ i;";m-P.E. Lie. No. :U.'-o-1 ~ ''""1 ,, .. "l~\ 4l1 'isl \ ' Ii\ le ,,oo +~t,,fl.5 !'~~ ~lJJ; p\..,.+~ ; : I .' \ ! I ' ' \~·~ ' i / -) \ \ \ ! \ ' I ! . 0 : : I 1.5" BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE -MN /DOT SPWEB240B (2360 SPECIFICATION) 3• BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE· MN/DOT SPNWB230B (2360 SPECIFICATION) a· CLASS 5 AGGREGATE B ASE, MN /DOT 3138" GEOFABRIC, MN/DOT TYPE V, MIRAFI SOOX, 80Z/SY NON-WOVEN APPROVED SUB GRADE DESIGN DAT A: STREET SECTION: 1.5" SPWEB2408 WEAR COURSE (MN OOT 2360) 2.S· SPNWB230B BASE COURSE (MN DOT 2360) 8"CL 5AGGREGATE BASE (MN D0T31J8) SUBGRADE F"BRIC (8 OZ/SY. NON-IVOVEN)(W required) (See Pa vement Design I R-Value Design -HaugoGeotec:hnic:a 01 -10-13) 6" (2' wide) CL 7 AGGREGATE SHOULDER CROSS SECTION: 3%CROWN 10' PAVEMENT WIDTH '< AGGREG" TE SHOULDER 3:1 DITCH SLOPE '< TYPICAL DITCH DEPTH 3' TYPICAL DITCH WIOTH Ul Ul < Cl. INSTALL CULV ERTS FOR EACH DRIVEWAY Wll H HOME CONSTRUCITON ~ i ; i g ~ "'' ,,oo 0-00 SATHRE-BERGQUIST , INC . 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN . SS39 1 (9S2) 47 6-aOOO I CITY PROJECT NO. ORONO, MINNESOTA PRELIM INARY STREET PLAN BAYSID:: ~1=AD0 '8S FILE NO. 31202-070 RESTORATION NOTES RESTORATION -2 _5 ACRES A. RESTORE A ll DISTURBED AREAS WITH 4ft TO 5· OF TOPSOIL . OR EXISTING ON-SITE ORGANIC MTRL. B . SEED POND SLOPES ANO DETENTION A REAS WITH MN/DOT 3100R BWSR PB SEED MIX AT A RATE OF 100 LBS.JACRE AND FERTIUZE WITH 20-0-10 AT 100 LBSJACRE. C. SEED ALL O T HER DISTURBED AREAS WITH MNOOT 250 AND BWSR SEED MIX FOR WETLANDS AT A RATE OF 100 LBSJACRE ANO FERTILIZE WITH 20-0-10AT 100 LBSJACRE. (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) D. ONLY PHOSPHCROUS FREE FERTILIZER IS TO BE USE D ON SITE. E. MULCH WITH TYPE 1 AT A RAiE Of 2 TONS/ACRE AND DISC ANCHOR IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLACEMENT . USE WOOOFIBER BLANKET ON ALL SLOPES 3: 1 (FT) OR GREATER. F. M AINTAIN ALL SILT FENCE UNTIL TURF HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. G. RESTORATION WORK WILL BE COMPLETED WIT HIN 72 HOURS OF GRADING COMPLETION. 10. SILT FENCE, BEFORE GRADING . 1,110 LF SEP TIC FIEL D PROTECTION -865 LF AFTER GRADING· 525 L F (pond) 11. TREE FENCE. BEFORE GRADING. 250 LF "· . .,.._, un1L.1 • .l :JU:::iY I I .,ilL I :,,:: w w Cl:'. 0 (/) Cl:'. w f-z :;;: a.. I I < ,...._ ~/ '"" :r. < C ;,. f- 7 SYMBOL LEGEND LOT LINE BUILDING SETBACK B O UNDARY PARCE L BOUN DARY LINE DRAINAGE A ND UTILITY EASEMENTS R IGHT·OF-WAY FLARED E NO SECTION WIRIP·RAP STORM S TUC TURE LABEL m W ELL $ S EPTIC S ITE EMERGEN CY OVERFLOW SWALE ,_ .. SOIL BORING LOCATION 0 BENCHMARK/ FOUND IP • PRE CONSTRUCTION SILT FENCE POST CONSTRUCTION S ILT F EN CE SEPTIC PROTECTION FENCING W OOOFIBER BLANK ET tLo<.L DITCH CHECKS ~ UT ILITY POLE <"Q., O N-SITE BMPS ~ . Ll .,--- w 0::: u.,... u. ~ WO (.!)o WN ci::ci':~ woN z,,-... :;::a:::~ o<«:i :::;o o'!l J., ZQ 5Cl. ~ «.: I I I I I I. NURP POND. NUR P POND Will BE: UTILIZED TO M EE T OR EXCEEOOUALJTV ANO RATE CONTROl REQUIREMENTS 2. SKIMMERS• THE PONO Oun.ET STRUCTURE INCLUDES A St..6MERGE.DINlET PIPE TOAU.OW SKIMMING. 3. RIP RAP · RIP RAPW1ll 8 E UTILIZED AT All APRONS F OR E NERGYOl~PATIONAND PROVIOESEOIMENT CON TROL s~ f! ~: .. ~ i · 4. Sl0PE STA.8/LIZATION • Sill FENCE Will BE INST Al.LED A.lONG DOWN GRADIENT GRADING ll~TS ANO\VOOOFIBER Bt.ANKE T WILL BE UTILIZED ON All SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER TO PROVIDE AOEOUATE St.OP€ STA.81UZATION. S. BIOROLLS . BIOROLLS WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG REAR YARD SWALES TO PREVENT SEOIIJIENT FROM REACHING THE NVRP PONO A.NO U..TIMATELY DOWNSTREA.M WETI..ANOS 6. INFILTRATION/RETENTION AREAS -INF1l TRA.TION.iRETENTIO "'I AREAS W1LL 8E. UTILIZED TO REOUCEJRET~N THE RUNOFF FROM THE INCH.EASED ~OSUHFACE 7. STREET SWEEPING -STREET SWEEPI NG WILL BE OONE A. MINIMUM OF ONCE PER 'h'EEK OR MORE F"REOUENTlY TO MINIMIZE OUST CON TROL ANO IIEHIClE T RACK.INC. 10. PHOSPHOHOUS FAEE FERTILIZER. PHOSPHOHOUS FHEE FEIUIU Zl:H WlU. A.LSD BE USED ON SI TE. ·a 'O < i! N ., E ~ 'O -;;; ~ "'· ::, - OWNER: PETER & SHARON RENNEBOHM PID#-0611723210005 Bayside Me adow Project N ote s: OWNER: JAMES MORGAN & DEBRA PULFORD PID#-0611723220022 1. The hou se types and placement and proposed dri veways are for illustrative purposes only. A detailed certificate of survey will be prepa,ed for e ach lol. conforming lo the the City setback teQUirements. 2. Tree Clearing will be required for the road and stormwater pond conslruction. There are trees shown In red, thal illustrate tr ees tha t may be removed fOf lhe proposed house a nd driveway oonstruction. The proposed house placement for L, &2 will be wilhln lhe elUsling ~site tree cove,e. 3. Off-Site grading will be required for the private road construction. the necessary grading easements will be obtained once the project has pr!!liminary plat approval, since there maybe plan re....;SK>ns. 4. A monument is proposed and a monument ea sement will be obtained. 5. Street . Rural Section -Se e Street Plan S heet -Ditch typical section 3:1 slope f 'Z depth f 3' Width 50 25 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET =;.:...-+-'=-+-=-+-===-+-'-----'R,::E:.;V.::IS:.:.10::;N.:.;S:_ ____ --I U SE (IN C LUO ING COPYING . DISTRIBUTION, ANOi OR CONVEYANCE OF Sit!_La~t ptt Clty ~~~ INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT I S STRICTLY PROHIBITED WlTHOUT DESIGNER NO. BY DA TE 1 1 HEREBY CERTIFY T HAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED SY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANO THAT I AM A DULY RE GISTERED PROFESSIONAL E NG INEER UNCER THE LAWS OF THE S TATE OF MINNESOTA. R SM DRAWN BY RSM · 1 CHECKED SY "" ·1 DATE 01 -15-13 I RSM 02-15-13 -r l I I SATHRE-BERGOUIST, INC:s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID A UTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN IUEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THE REBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUI ST, INC. OF All RES PON S IBILITY. SA THRE-BERGQUIS T, INC. RES ERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEG ITIMATE _ U S!:.H. OH PARTY l EGA LLY K ESPONS IBLE:. FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RES ULT ING FR OM ILLEGITMATE US E. Robert S . M~st~· P.E. D ate: ol,/t dJ] Li e:. No. J-4'-fk t GENERAL NOTES: OWNER: JAMES & JULIE DZUBAY PID§-0611723220023 OWNER: BRADLEY PASS PID#-0611723240001 OWNER: ERIN SULLIVAN PID#-0611723220024 1. INSTALL SILT FENC E AS SHOWN ON PLAN, A S REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF ORONO OR DIRECTED BY T HE ENGIN EER. I (f-)00 00 J Cl) Cl) < a. 2. THE WATE R QU ALITY PONO MUST BE EXCAVATED AT THE BEGINNING OF GRADING OPERATtoNS TO PROVIDE T EMPORARY STOR M WATER DETENTION DURING CON STRUCT ION. SAND A NO S ILT MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE POND A S NECESSARY DURING CONSTRUCTION AND AT THE COMPLET ION OF THE PROJECT. 3. BEGIN GRADING. IN STALL PERFORATED RISER PIPE IN PONDS WHEN PONO GRADING IS COMPLETE. TEMPORARY DRAINAGE P IPE SHALL BE USED FOR INTE RMEDIATE DRAINAGE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD AS NECESSARY AND DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND EXCAVATED PONDS. 4. INSPECT POND, SILT FENCE, AND ROCK ENTRANCE BERM AFTER ALL RAINFALL EVENTS AS REQUIRED BY THE NPOES PERMIT. 5. LINE All PONDS WITH A MINIMUM 3· ORGANIC SOILS & SEED SLOPES BETWEEN NWL AND 100 YR HWL WITH A WATER TOLE RANT M IX. (OR AS NOTE D) 6. RE MOVE PERFORAT ED RISER PIPE WHEN STORM SEWER ANO OUTLE T STRUCTURE FOR PON DS ARE INSTALLED. 7. POND . 10:1 BENCH (1 FOOT) THEN 3:1 MAX 8. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR IS RESPONS IBLE FOR All STORM WATER INSPECTIONS ACCORDING TO THE MPCA STORM WATER PERMIT. THIS INCLUDES BOTH W EEKLY IN SPECT IO NS A N D INSPECTIONS DONE AFTER A 0.5" RAIN EVENT. A COPY OF THE INSPECTION REPORT MUST BE EMAILED TO THE ENG INEER ANO DEVELOPER ON A WEEKLY BASIS. 9. THE CON TRACTOR SHALL PLACE ANO MAIN TAIN AN EFFECTIVE Sil T CONT ROL DEVICE. INLE T PROT ECTION SHALL BE REMOVED WH EN RESTORAT ION HA$ BEEN ESTA BLISHED. 10. A l l R ETAINING WALLS W IL L REQUIRE A STRUCTURAL DESIGN , A BUILDING PE RMIT & A FINAL INSPECTION REPORT. 11. A 1·-2"' CRUSHED ROCK ENTRANCE BERM SHALL BE PLACED AT THE SITE E NTRANCE, TO REPLACE SILT FENCE, AND MINIMIZE EROSION ON TO THE STREETS . THE ROCK BERMS SHALL BE THE W IDTH OF THE ENTRANCE AND 2 FEET HIG H WITH 4:1 SLOPES, 12. THE CON TRACTOR S HALL MAINTAIN POSIT rYE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM T H E SUILO ING PAD ANO STREET AREAS THROU GHOUT C ONSTRUCTION. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ATTEMPT T O PREVENT SOIL MATERIALS FROM LEAVING THE SITE BY EROSION AND V EHICLE WHEEL TRACK ING. HE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING OF ST RE ET, 8 0ULEVARO AND UT1LITY FACILITIES THAT RECEIVE ANY ERODED OR TRACKED SOil M ATERIAL OR OTHER CON STRUCTION D EBRIS OR MATERIAL 14 . EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE. SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY . THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ANO ALL DAMAGES ARISIN G OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE A NO PRESERVE ANY A ND All EXISTING UTILITIES. SATHRE-BERGQU IST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN . 5 5391 (952) 4 76-6000 CITY PROJECT NO . ORONO, MINN ESOTA PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN BAY S IDE MEADOWS FIL E N O. 31202-070 GP / /GP AIS /,I; BFt: CII caox ca. BEE 18 (HI CMH CONC a,p DP EB ENH 11WC E»f DI Flt FP F'ES 0/IS'i QFE GIi ClDl GP aYW HCS lf'II) LP 118 NOP CHU Pl($ PIV RCP 111D sco SIIH sv SIP sn.t1 'IRS ll uoc UC[ UClO $AH ST UP ULP 1114 Motl 'fN IET A-1 Denotes Adv-c:nising-lnform:uio nJl Sig.n OenOfei Air ComJitioning Unit Oennte~ Ba,;ement Floor l::.levJli11n l.knotes Carch Basi n Dt::notcs Curb Box Denote; Bui klin:,: Column Denotes Building fntr.1m.~ l:.\e.,.arion Dl!'nolfi T d ~Comm. Box/POO Denot~ Communi..:ation HJndhote Denotes Com munica11on t.,fanhole Dt::nolt:S Cum.'.ri:-h: Surface DellOlt.-S Conugate<l i\·tel31 Pipe1Siu Dt:notes Ductilt: Iron Pi~ Size Denote~ Electric ~1)( L>enotes Elt:\:tric Handhl)k Denores Electric Transformer Denotei Electtk !\.fanhule Denotes Electrit' !\.·letcr Denores t=ire Hookup Denotes Flag Pole Denotes. Flared End Scclion1Sizc Dt::notcsGas Valve Denotes Garage Floor Elevation Otno1es Gas Meter Denotes Ground Light l>enote-s Guard Po:i.t Denotes Guy Wire Denotes H:mdiC'::ip Pllrking Sign Dienote:. fire Hydrant Denotes Liy:ht Pole Oenot~ Mailbo ., Denot~ No Park ing Sign Dcnorcs Ovc-he:11.l Utility Linc Dc:noll!S Parking S1gn Denotes Post Indicator Val••e Denotes Re-in forced Concrete Pipe Siz,e l.knores Roof Orain Denotes Sanitary Ckanuut Dtnotes Snnit 11ry M:inhol.:: D:notes Septic Vent Denotes Stop Sign Ck-notes Stonn M:1.nnole Deno1es Tratlic Conrrol Sign Iknote§ Traffic Light O.:nutes Undc:rsrounJ Communicatiun Li ne Denotes UndagrounJ E\('('tric line Denotes Underground Ga s Lme Denotes Underground s ~n it:iry Sc:wer Denotes Undc:rground Stonn Sewer Deno tes Utility Pole Deno!ei Utility/light Pole DertOfes Top ~ul ofHyJr.mt Denotes Water Manhole Denot~ Water Va lve Denotes Weiland Dclinc1ni on.'Flag ldentific:r Denotes Existing Contour -<lllt>---Denoles Pru~ ConlO ltr e ~nute> FounJ Monu1mmt • A'j lk:noi..:J @ Dentoes Found Cast. Iron . Monument O Dc:notes I f2'" by H" Iron Pi pe Sc:t ,:mJ Y1arke<l by LicenSC" No. 403 4-1 N 0 80 40 40 80 SCALE IN FEET 160 V I C I N I T y M A p \ I I I I I / I I I I / I // I I \ ./ /1 . .., . I I ,, I I / I I / I -or·/ I _.,.,. I 1 __ _ ----- I'-~--\. A-. \ } ,<§§>' I , I I f · I I I 1-_;0;;:E;.:;S;:;IG:;:N,:.:E;;;R~-f...;.;.;;;.;..i-:~.+-==-+------'R...;Ea;Vc:;IS;;.;ID;;aN...;Sa...------t ~Ni~~;,~~g~~'t;~il;l~~:i~~l1~u;~~;i"v°~~~~~;;:;';~T ---------SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT DRAWN BY DBP CHECKED BY OBP DA TE 0 1/17113 SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEG ITIMATE use ANO SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERG QUIS T, INC. OF ALL RE SPONSIBILITY. S AT HRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVE$ THE RIG HT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITlt.\ATE USER OR PARTY LEG ALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMA GES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITM ATE USE . \ \ \ \ I \ I ' \ ' / / / / / I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I "' I / I I • .,. ~-n \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I,\\ SATHRE-BERGQUIST, IN C. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN . 55391 (952) 4 76-6000 DE SrRIPTIQN OF SUBJECT PROPERTY Outll)t C. e;.;cep11he North 123.00 feet of the: Wot l4 8 50 feet of Ou1 \1.,11 C. 01\.YVIEW FARMS 2ND ADD1TION. Henn~pin . SITE ADDRESS Unassignal . Orono . f\linnesorn. 55359 This s ut'V\..'")' docs no1 puq,ort to show any unJ..:rgrounJ utililics. The :iioun:c ofinfonnation from phms anJ markings will be combined with observed eviJerm: of urilitie:; 10 d(\'elop a view of thoSc unc.Jergroun<l uti litie::.. Howe\er. bcking e.'lcavation, the: c:x;ac1 location of undrtgruund t'c:anircs cannot be accurately, complc:tel)' and reliably dcpictc<l. Where adJi1ional or mc1re tle1ailetl infonnation is required. the cli~T i~ atl vi~ that excava1ion may be necoe.~1ry . Thc: cun1rar.:1ur sha\1 c.Jch:nninc the c...al·1 lol-;,1 ion of any ;md all eKi~lini u1ili1ic:, bdou: l·vrmncni.:ing; work. The contra,:tor shall b~ fully respun1oible fOT any 3nJ :ill dam3go arising out of his fai lure to ex-.1c1ly locate anJ protect all existing utility facilities. Cont:ict GOPHER STATE ONE CALL ar651·45-t--0002 for pr~ise onsirt: location of utilities prior to any ex;cava tion. Custom Home BuilJm Title. LLC. :is issuing agent for Old R~public N:nion:il Titl~ lnsurJnce Company commitment for mle insurance file No. Hl:!.·250Slt effc:ctive date ofOet:c:mber J. 2012. was relied upon as 10 m:mm ofrcoord. The subject property appc:,~ to lie wi1hin Zone X, (area of area:. outside the I-percent annual chance floodplain, areas of l % annual chance she~! flow llooding whc:re average depths are less rhan l foot. areas of 1% annu al chance stream floodin g where the contributing drainage areil is less than 1 square mile, or areas protected from the I 'Ai anm1al chance flood by \eve~. Ko Base Flood Elevations or depths are shown within this zone. lns.urance purchase is nut rajuirnJ in tho:c zunes.). pi:r lhc: Narivn:sl Flood [n)uram:e Prugr.1m. FlooJ ln.:,v.r.tm.:e R~te Map Comm un ity Panel No. 2705lC0285C. dated September 2 , 2004 as acquirc-d from 1he FcdC'T"31 Emergency Management Agency Web Sire. Area Information: Lo, Area •597,64) Sq. Ft.. IJ.72 Acres Cumnt zoning and sc=tb:idc. infonnation: Zoning: KR -18 -One Family Rural Residential Build ing Setbacks: Front Yard -50 ti=et RearYarJ -50feet Side Yard .JO feet /Strffi. SO feet •zoning and Setback information provided hy lhe Planning Department nfthe Ciry nfOmno. Survey coonJinate and bt"aring basis : Hc:nncpin County Coordinate Base No modifications to this mrvey or s ketch may be perfonned by any penon other than t he surveyor Si boning this certification or persons under his d in:ct supervision. This dnwing and data is protected by federal copyright laws. Its reproduction a nd redi stribution without proper cons~nl is prohibited . Bc:nchmuk: MNOOT Geod~tic Control Sta1ion Yl 17 Rl:::SET • Maple Pl:i iri Elevation • 1013.43 fc:et (NGVD~9 ) TITLE COMMITM(NT N0T£S· 10. Parcel subject to utility and drain:sgc: ea-sc-mcnts as shown on rhc: ph1.1 ofB/\ YV!EW FARMS 2ND ADDITION . 11. Putel subject to renns 11n,t c<mdition$ of Flowa gc: and ('on">eN:llion E..,semenl and W11 ivcr of D:m1agc1o, in favor of 1he City of Orono. whL~·h grJm:io the ri~hl to rtstri1:t lhc: use:. impruve men1s and development over the wetlands as shown on the plat of BA YVll:W FAR?vlS, filc:d on February 12, 1980. as ()Q(.:ument No. 137 1023. (Dc:fined as "'as shown on the plat of BAYVI EW FARMS"). 12. Parcel subject to terms and condi1ions of Road and Utilities Easemc:nt for public in ~. egress. access. roaJ and utilities purposes. in favor of City of Orono. as c.,-e31ed in document dateJ Ocml:k:=r 28. 199-'. tiled November 29. 199-'. as Doc ument No. 25 700.!5. lOver Outtot D. 8/\ YVU:.W f/\RJ..IS 2~D ADDITION) U . Pti rccl subject to terms enJ comfaions of Road and Urilit k-s Eascmt:nls for public ingn.-s.s. egress, access. road and utilities pull)OScs. in favor of City orOrono. as created in document dated Cko1ber 28, 1994, filed November 29, 1994, as Document No. 25 700:!6. (Over Ou1 lot 8, BAYVIEW FAR.MS 2 ~D AOOI TION) 1-i. Access to fhc subj~1 property is limited over public e;..semen1 in favor o f the City of Orono 15. Parct"l $ubjet:1 tu wetlanJs which may be s ub ject to feJC'!"'Jl , slate. or local n:g ul afion Plrtel subjct·t to terms and con.Jitions for Driveway Easem¢nt over Outlot 8 . BAYVIEW FA~IS 2'.\JD ADDITION. in favor of Loi 1. Block I. BAYVIEW FARMS 2ND ADDITION. (Shown on Certificate of Title) Thi i b 10 ccnitY to ER VI:,,; W.\CHM.\N'. JR .• L.\KE COMMV:-SITY 0.\:,./K.CUSTOM HOME BUILOf'.RS TITLE C0MPA:,.1Yand OLD REPUIILIC' ~1,\T!O;'II AI. TITI.E ISSUR A:,.l(E COMPA;'IIY 1ha11hi \m,1porrl:i1 ~no.I the survey on .,,.hich it i:. b;.is.cJ were m:uJc in ac.:or,Janc-c .... ith th,,. 2011 Miniinu.1n $1.1n,.LUU Drtail Rcquircmcr,u. for .\LT.·V.\CSM Land Ti1!e Sun.·cys. Jointly estab lished and ;t;Joptcd by ALTA and ~Srs. The lidJ worl; was compktcJ on 0\.-ccmlx"I' I~. :?011. Dated the 7th day ofJ:mllary. 20ll. D11vid 8. Pembfflon. Profession.ti LanJ Surveyor Minnesota License 4034..i TWP.117. RGE .23. SEC.06 HENNE PIN COUNTY BOOK XXX/PAGE XXX ORONO, MINN ESOTA ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY IRV IN WACHMA N, JR., LAKE COMMUNITY BANK CU STOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE, LLC OL D RE PUBLIC NA TI ONAL TITLE INSURANCE CO . FILE NO. I I I I I I I I I ~I 0:: ul ~' §I z ~1 I I I I I I I ..i'.Jt' / ,v C: J. ::.,.. / ..-.8 --· 0 ---, :! ,... 7 C: < C C!'. ,,.. :- 7 :::: :--.._, ~ ,--- 4f I I I I I I OWNER: PETER & SHARON RENNEBOHM PID#-061 1723210005 CONSERVATION EASEMENT D ~L-,r---= /' I I I -5·:1 r~-~ I r -.,--;;-i I t.. \\n I I I I \\I I I I \~I • \\ \~\ • I ·1 \~ L U t I I 1 ..-J V.-l I L-_.. -1.--;-_J OWN ER: JAMES MORGAN & DEBRA PULFORD PIDH-0611723220022 50 25 25 50 SCALE IN FEET TREE PRESERVATION EASEMENT 100 OWNER: AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE PID#-0611723220021 DESIGNER NO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE CINCLUDING COFYING. DISTRIBUTION. ANO/OR CONVEYANCE OF l-...!:!:c;R:;S•::!!1 ~-+_;.:::::.+°":RS::',M+:::02'=~ .. "';,,:-t----:..,.:::,.:::-:::C..::,..,=:;,doo::-;:E,=-=•---j INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIB IT ED WITHOUT OWNER: JAMES & JULIE DZUBA Y PID#-0611 723220023 \ DRAWN BY RSt.1 2 RsM I 02:1!1-,'j --·Sf1el.•'f0\lt1>t11Ci1~1a -SATHR E-BERGOU IST,INC.'sEXPRESS WR ITTEN AU THORIZATtON. USEwtTHOUT I • ·1 SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEG ITIMATE USE AND SHALL THERE BY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST. INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY . I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS Pl.AN OR SPECIFICATION NAS PREPARED BY M E OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANO THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGIN EER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ~t,fc.~5 l SAT H RE-BERGQUIST, INC . CHECKED BY x<x DATE I SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITP.IATE . _1 1 . I . USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAG ES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITM ATE use . . I 01 -l S-13 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA , MN 55391 C95 2J 47~ ROben S. M~SI~, P.E. Date: Ol,ltd!] Lie. No. Jd.':a-t \ \ ~ ~· \ \ \ \~ \ . ) \ \ OWNER: --, r ---l J • ··~ ~\ ~:}~=:q L---~ / \, j ~ \ </ /,"> ,> / / / \ ("' / / ',\ V // V' ERIN SULLIVAN PID#-0611723220024 CITY PROJECT NO. ORONO, MINNESOTA SITE CONSERVATION PLAN BAYSIDE MEADOWS (/) (/) <{ Cl. FILE NO. 31 202-070 '%p / I CP NORTH 60 4 0 4 0 60 160 SCALE IN F EET WET A-1 Denutt"s W!!tland Dclincotion!Flog tJentifif'f Denotcs E11istini; Contou r ~Oenm~ Pmpo~e<l C'o ntom • Oc!no1es Found Monument -As ~otc,.J ® Dent~s Found Cut -Iron • Monummt 0 Dcm>lcs 1/2~ by 14~ {run Pi~ Set and M:ukcd by License Nu. 403-1-1 UKAI NAGI: /\NU UTILITY b \StMt:NTS /\KC SHOWN rHUS: NOTTO SCALE Being S feel in width anJ 11Jjoining 101 lin~. unless 01herwisc inJicared. and 10 feet in width and adjoining right orway lines. u nl ess 01herwise indicated. 3.$ sho wn on 1hc plat. T---L I I I I l I I I I l I ~ \ \ \ \ --- \ \ --r- l I .., .., I( () ,. 11,) l'l ) \I)" I \4\ P AINTERS CREEK --------- LOT I 3:J)CK : 245.22 R=3 13.3~ ?•4·\·49'5 4• B AYVIEW LOT I B L OCK 2 ' .. , .... '!)O•J I r i :.;~-: '...-~ n_.,. J , , ,,.''\ r -..., ft"' \ ,... '\ ..;!I .(, \ "\ t, ~ 1 1 I I <\,..... \ "'IB ~ I I I I lo \'"\ \ • ,,,., ,,,., 'n ,,,. .., .., ::i I I _l_ _J_ "' s 0 0 I ~ \ '~ \1 ,·, 1 1 \ ..-i ~~', \ I ;r :l \ .. / ~--]_.,,~-\~.;....._} J _. __ _.'_...,_ .. ,_.z.,.,i•------------~Me,'i.•i-:i.1;~----'~' ---- I S8j".37'Q 7 '\11 G57 !:6 OYINER: I ~ .j..,. .... .,. OWNER: ..l:F'FREY A P ATRICA n-iUlL P'Cf-0811723 2.30019 l C.A. ARMSTRONG PASS ll B.J. PASS I Pt01-061 t72J2.l0021 l .._____:D:.:E;:S;;;IG;:cN;;;E;:;R'---f--'N.:.;O:;_·+-=B::'Y::-f7 D::;A;;;TE::..,...+-ccc:c-:c==-:--cR::'E"-V"-IS:::l.:cON;_:S::_ ____ -! USE (INC LUDING COPYING. DISTRIBUTION, ANO/OR CONVEYANCE OF DBP 01/21/13 ADD OUTLOT A {R/WJ INFORMATION) OF TH IS PRODUCT IS STRIC TLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT I hereby cenify that this survey. pl :m or report was pn:p:ircJ by me or under my Jir('c! supervision :mJ 1h:i t I :im a J uly Li1.:enst!<l Land Sur\'ey-0r onJer tht- law!ll ufd1c Sta te: of Mi irnoot:i. DRAWN BY DBP CHE CKED BY DBP DATE 01 /17113 OBP 02/15/13 _ R~vl_?~ ~E.R ~1n "Co~ME~J~. _ SATHRE-BE RGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZAT ION. USE WlTH OUT I ---. __ · 1~6~:~,~~os~~~!l~~~~;~:~i.T,~~.A~Fl~Ll~G~~l~~~s~:1~,~~.o SHALL THEREBY f SAT HRE-BERGQU IST, INC. RES ERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEG ITIMATE • _ USER OR PAR1Y LEGALLY RESPON SIBLE FOR OAMAGES OR LOS SES RESULT ING I FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. Datc<l thi:) 2L.I day o ( January. 2013 ~~~~~,,__ll....=----=-------- Davi<l B. P~berton, Prufl!ss ion:i l L:ind Surv('yllr Minn 1..-so1:1 Li cenSI!' No. 40 344 SATHRE-BERGQUIST, IN C. 1SO SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 5539 1 (95 2) 476-6000 D ESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY Outlot C. e~o:cpt the North 123.00 ta!r of the Wesr I-I R.50 feet uf0111 !or C. BAYVIEW F/\R.r.lS 2ND AD01Tt0N. Hennep in . SITE A DDRt::SS Una:.signtro • ()rQno. Minn~la 55359 Th is survey d<)~ nu! purport tu shnw any underground utiliti(s. The s1>urce ofinfonnation fr1>m plan:; anJ m!trk inis will be combini:J with observed cviJc:nce of utilities to develop i! vie w of those und ergro und utili ti~. Howeve r. lack mg cxcavation. th ( e xat·t locarion of underground fe.1rure!ll cannot be accurately, com plet.:ly and rd lably d1::pictcd . Where atld irion3\ or more J erni tcd infonmtion is required, the c!iem is ;,dvist!<l that e:<cav1uion may b( nC\:1;$Sary. T~ co ntr:u:ror sh:111 dt:ti::nni ne the e xact loca tion of any and all existing util ities before commencing work. The conrractor shall b( fu lly respons ible for any and all da mages arisi ng out of his fitilure to exactly loca te and protect all u is1ing utility fac ilities Co nta ct GOPHBR ST /\ T C O NE C/\LL at 651-454-0002 for precise onsitc location of utilities prior to :my excavanon. Cus to m Home BuikJers Ti lle. LLC. as i ssuing agen t for Old. Republi c Na tional T itle Insurance Company commitment for title iruur.mce fil e No . ilU-2505R. effective date of December 3. 2012. w:is rel ied upon as to matters of r«ord. The .'iuhject property :t prear... to li e w ithm Zone X, (area of :tre--t'i 1)11t~iltt: the 1-pcn:ent annual chance fl oodplain. arC"JS of 1•1o a11 nud chance slk:el flo w OooJ mg whet( avaage 1.k p1hs arc less 1ha r1 I foul. areas of 1% annual cham:e strea m tl ooJing where the contribut ing drainage ar,:,a ii lesi lhan 1 ~uare mile. orarca:i protected from 1hc: 1%, ann ua l chance tl ood by kvces. No Base Fl ood El .:vations or depths arc shown with in 1his zone. l nsuranct pun:hase is not requ ir,....J in rhest> 7J.J n es..), ~r rhe National Flood lnsur.mce Prognm, Flood lnsur:mc e Rate 1'.lap Cumm unity Panel No. 27053C0285E. J a1ed Scpr~ber 2. 2004 as acquired from the Federal Emergency t,..lan:tgemenr Agency Web Si te . Are:1 lnform:11ion : Lot l\rc:1 -S97 .64J Sq . Ft . -I J .72 Acres Cum:nl zoning :md se1back infomrn tion: Zoning: RR·l8 -0ne f a mily Rura l Rc.si<l o:ntia l Bui lding Sc-tbac ks : Front Yar<l -SO fc:cl Rear Yan! -SO fed SiJe Yard· JO fe~ I Street~ 50 fec:t • Zoning am.I Setb,1ck informat iun pruvidc<l by the-Phmning Dt:panment of the: City of Oruno. Survey coordinare an<I bearing ba.si s: H<:-nn(J)in Counry Cm;,n.!ina tc Base Nu moJifica tioos tu this survey or sk!!tch may be performed by any person oth er th an the surve)or signing 1his cenificalion or -persons un<le r his direct supervision. This J r.iwing and d,113 is protected by fedcf31 copyright la ws. Us reproduction and redi srribu1ion wirhout propc 1..vnS<:nt is prohibited. Benchmark: /\.INOO f Geodetic Control St ation YI 17 RESET . Maple !'lain Elc:vatiun • 1013.43 fo:r (NGV0~9) T ITLE. C'O~-t~IITM f.NT NOTF.S : 10 Parcel s11b;ec1 to utility :met dr.1 in:tge e:tsements as shown c,m rhe phtt of BAYVIEW FARt.lS 2ND ADDlTI0:-1. 11 Parrel !llubject to terms and conditions of Flo"age am.I Conservation Ease:men1 and Wai ver of D:images. in favor of the Cit)· of Oron o. which grants the right to restrict the use, improvements and deve lopmeni ove-r rhe "etl a.nds as shown on th e platofBAYVIE W FARMS. fikd on February 12. 19~0. as Docum<.'flr No I), 11023 (Ddined as "as shown on thl' plat of BAYVIEW FARMS") 12. P.ircel subject 10 tmns ::ind conditions ufRuad anJ Util itit-S Easement for public ingress. egrtss. acct>s s. road and utiliti es purposes. in fa\·or of City of Orono. as creatcJ m doc ument datctl Oc1ober 28. 191}4. fi1 1..'\.I November 29 . 199-1 . as Docum~nl No . 25 70025 . (Over Ourlot 0 . BAYVIEW FARMS 2ND ADDlTION) 13 Pare~\ subject 10 terms ind condirions of Road :mJ Util ities Easements fur public ingres.s, egress. accc:ss. ro JJ and utilities purpoSC$, inf.nor of Ciry of Orono. as crea1eJ in d<Jcument J.neJ Oco1bc:r 28, 199-1. fi led November 29, 199.f, :\S Oocum('nl No. 2570026. (OvcrCM \01 8 . BA YVIEW Fi\Rl\.lS 2ND ADD lTI ON) 14. Access to the subject prof)(ny is limited over public easement in favorof1he Ciry of Orono. 15. Parcel subject to wetlands which may be subject 10 feJer..1. sme. or kx::i l regu1:ition Parc el subJccl to tenns and condi1ions for Drivew\ly Ea sement over Ou1lot B. BA YVltW F/\RJ..·IS 2ND ADD ITION. in favur uflot I, Block I , BAYVI EW FARMS 2ND ADDIT ION. (Shown on Ce-rtificateofTi!lc) TWP.117 • RGE.23 • SEC .06 H ENN EPIN COUNTY BOOK X.XX/PAGE XXX ORO NO, MINN ESOTA P RELIM INARY PLAT BAYS IDE M EADOWS FILE NO. 31202--070 pp/ /PP MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. choenzeit noted thi s is a difficult lot to work with and has a number of pract ical d ifficulties. sta d in hi s mind further mitigation will be difficult to reques t. Landgra r noted the City Council di scussed the prior failure of the bluff. property as well as the adjoining property experienced a bluff f: · 'Jure on the adjacent property occurred approximately three Landgraver noted the · hbor stated at the Council meeting that there w e a number of plastic bottles and other debri s under the ii that contribut ed to the failure. Leskinen indicated it is her unde anding t ha t s ubterranean wall ere cons tructed to fix the failure on this property and are still in place . Curtis indicated that is correct. Curtis indicated they are approximately in the stairs but that she is not aware of th e exact location. Landgraver noted those were facts t h at t Planning Comrn is sr had n ot di scussed b efore and that he wanted the Commi ss io ners to be a war of th ose. Schoenzeit noted th e C ity Counc · a lso wa nted the DNR to commen t o this application before it was brought b ac k to the C ity Coun · but t h at it probabl y is ready for the Plan ·ng Commi ssio n to comment on. con cern on thi s site due to the in cr eased hardcover. C urti s indi cated the rading pl a n as proposed is con s istent with the City's requireme to ma inta in drainage to the la or to the road o n to the ap pli cant 's property. In this case t he run o f · diverted to the lake. C urti s in cated th ere a re ways to cap ture it and treat it or s lo w it dow n but that it is iffic ult to do some of tho meas ures g iven the topography of th e lo t. Landg ver moved, Leskinen seconded, to recommend approval of Application #12-3582, olson C ust Homes on Behalf of BWB Holdings, 4731 No rth Shore Drive, granting of variances, bject to e conditions of the City E ngineer and the De partment of Natural Resources. VOTE : Ayes ys 0. NEW BUSINESS 3. #13-3591 "E RVIN W ACHMAN, O UTLOT C, BAYVIEW F ARMS z No ADDITIO N (PID 06-117-23-22-0018), PRELIMINARY PLAT/SUBDIVI SION, 6 :45 P.M. -7:22 P.M. Erv in Wac hm an, Applicant; B ill Coffman, Coffma n Development; Robert Mol stad, Satre-B ergquist; Mark Kj ulh aug; a nd Eric S im s, 4645 Baysid e Road, were pre sent. Page 3 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. 2. Lot 2 is proposed to contained 2.26 acres total ; 2.25 acres dry, buildable and 0.009 acre wetland. Lot 2 has 92-plus feet in width at the cul-de-sac and 180-plus feet in width at the principal building setback and contains 2.25-plus dry acres in area. There is a very small portion of the manage 2 wetland on the northeast corner of the property; a 30-foot wetland buffer is shown surrounding the wetland. Tree preservation easements are proposed on the eastern half of the property as well as a portion across the so uthern lot line of the property to protect and preserve the existing tree stand. Al required RR-1 B setbacks can reasonably be met when this lot is developed with a new home. The septic treatment sites are located out of the tree preservation area. 3. Lot 3 is proposed to contain 2.63 acres total dry, buildable area. It is proposed to have 110-plus feet in width at the cul-de-sac and 220-plus feet in width at the principal building setback. It contains 2.63-plus dry acres in area. It appears all required RR-1B setbacks can reasonably be met when this lot is developed with a new home. Tree preservation easements are shown along the southern and western property boundaries. 4. Lot 4 is proposed to contain 2.18 acres total; 2.03 acres dry, buildable and 0.15 acre storm pond . The lot is proposed to primarily front along the private road with a small portion accessing off the cul-de-sac. It is proposed to have 2.038-plus dry acres and will have approximately 0.15 acre of this lot. All required Rr-1 B setbacks can reasonably be met when this lot is redeveloped with a new home. This lot will also have a tree preservation easement along the western, rear lot line. 5. Lot 5 is proposed to contain 2.16 acres total ; 2.12 acres dry, buildabl e and 0.04 acre storm pond. A tree preservation easement is proposed over the western and northern portions of the property. The applicant is proposing to plat Outlot A to create a private road with a cul-de-sac. City Codes require a 50-foot corridor and a I 00-foot cul-de-sac for a local pri vate road. Street design information was s ubmitted with the application materials and has been reviewed by the City E nginee r. The o riginal plan refl ected necessitating varian ces. At first review of the applicant's revised plan, it appears that they do now meet the City's dimen s ional and engineering size requirements for curve and slope. With the final plat application, th e applicant will need to submit ma in tenance covenants for recordin g with the plat which address oncoming maintenance and upkeep of the private road. This property triggers the Rural Oasis Conservation Design Plan. A conservation plan dated February 6 was included in the Planning Commission's packets. A preservation easement is proposed which will protect the significant trees identified on proposed Lot 2. The tree preservation easement is also proposed to extend along the perimeter of the entire property begi nning at the south end of the wetland on the east and continuing around c lockwise to the north end of proposed Lot 5. This tree preservation agreement will protect the significant trees identified on proposed Lot 2 as well as a stand of white pines on the western perimeter. A co nservation easement is proposed at the north end of proposed Lot l where it abuts the Sims property. This easement ma y preserve lake views enjoyed from th e S im s property. The a pplicant 's plan also outlines invasive, on-native spec ie s to be removed. The report indicates the individual land owners should be respons ibl e for invasive specie s removal upon con structio n of a new home. Staff would recommend the responsibility of the initial removal be placed on the developer, with the homeowners association being respo n sible for ongoing maintenance. The Planning Commiss ion Page 5 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. additional maintenance. Coffman indicated he is not sure how they would be able to require anothe r landowner to give up their road access. Curtis indicated she did s peak with Mr. Geffre on Thursday and that he indicated they do not want the additional expense of a longer driveway and that he wants to remain independent of the new s ubdivision. Mr. Geffre was not able to attend tonight's meeting but has s ubmitted a letter detailing his concerns. Land graver asked if the Geffres originally agreed with combining the dri v eways. Curtis indicated they did but that in speaking to them, s he had the impress ion that they did not completely und e rstand the ramifications of that. Mr. Geffre's February 14th letter states the following: "I am writing with some concerns re garding Land Use Propos ition # 13-3 591. This proposition is in regards to connectin g my existing driveway at 4665 Bays ide Road with the proposed new private roadway to the Wachman Parcel. I am opposed to connecting my driveway to the proposed private roadway for the following reasons: No. 1. The new driveway would require much more maintenance and upkeep as it would be approximately I 00 feet longer; No. 2. The new driveway would come very close to my drain fi e ld. It also would c re at e a us e le ss strip of land between th e dri veway and County Road 84; N o. 3 . We do not want t o be respon sibl e fo r an y future r e p a irs, maintenance or upgradin g of t h e proposed private road." L e mke as ked if Hennepin County will hav e any problems with the two curb c ut s. C urti s indicated she cannot s peak fo r Henne pin County but that the County 's c omments are included in the packet. Curti s stated s he can a s k for c larific ati on from Hennepin Coun ty prior to this ap pli cation go in g before the City Coun c il if th e Planning Commi ss ion would like. Land graver stated as a po int of order, there is nothing th e Planning Co mmiss ion can do about the drain fi e ld. C urti s stat ed Mr. Geffre's point was that it was ve ry c lose to it and he d oes not wan t t o impact it. Berg asked ho w far away the n ew road is from Mr. Geffre's dri veway. Gaffron stated it is a pprox imat e ly 150 feet. Schoenzeit comm e nted that would also c reate a lot of ha rdcover. L a nd graver stated in terms of the conservation ease me nt, Staff brought up some good po int s a bo ut Mr. Sims' property. Landgraver asked if the ap pli cant is agreeable t o a conservation easemen t on the north en d of Lot I. Coffman indicated they are propo s in g that. Page 7 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEE T ING T uesday, February 19, 2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. Pat Thull, 210 North Shore Driv e , illu strated her property on the overhead. Thull indicate d sh e is glad to see the tre e buffer preserved but that t hey are n ot proposing a tre e buffer between their property and thi s development. Since the ir patio is v e ry close to the property line and their house is located uphill from thi s d evelopment, it w ould be nice not to h ave to look down on the homes . Thull stated s he wo uld lik e som e con sid e ration given to some trees being planted in that area s ince thi s develo pment change s the ex isting environment. Thull stated in order to accommodate the people who have bee n living t here , she would like to see more of a buffer b etwe en the current buildings around the prope rty . A ccording to the aerial view, the re are no tre e s and she doe s n ot understand why that is b e ing called a tree buffer. Cha ir Schoenz eit closed the public hearing at 7 : 13 p.m. Schoenzeit stated t he point about mixing a new development with an old neighborhood is a good point and one that the Planning Commi ss ion s hould review . Berg as ked if there are any trees at thi s time in that area. Thull indicated there are not. Sc hoe nzeit a sked if the devel o pe r is ame nabl e to pl an t in g som e trees in th a t area. Coffman stat e d th e aerial does de pi ct som e trees between t hi s devel opme nt a nd the W ac hm an p ro p e rty. T he Wac hmans h ave owned the property for 2 0 y ears and we r e there prio r to m an y of the othe r ho mes in t he a rea. Coffm a n indi c a te d t hey are certa inl y w illin g to t ake a lo o k at pl a ntin g some ad d iti o n a l trees a lo n g th e ed ge to stre n gt hen tha t buffe r in an effo rt to be a go od ne ighbor. Sc hoe n ze it as ke d if th at would be sati sfa ctory . Thull indi cat ed s h e w ould apprecia te that. Landg ra ver a s ke d if St aff has an y other ite ms th ey would like t h e Planning Commission to di scuss. C urti s indi c ate d at thi s p oi nt it appears th e a pplica nt has addressed a number of th e iss ues in th e ir new s ubmitta l of in fo rmati o n and that s he wo uld e ncourage th e Pla nning Commission to rei terate the direction · th ey wo uld lik e the appli c ant t o follo w . Sc hoenze it state d in fo ll ow in g the recomm end ations of Staff a nd th e C ity E ng in eer, the Pl annin g Commi ss io n would lik e t o se e zero v ari a nces ot he r than th e c ul-d e-sac le ngth . In addition, the Pl annin g C ommiss io n wo uld like t o see t he dev el oper includ e th e inva s ive spec ies c atalog uin g and pro posed rem o va ls, t h e g ranting of th e r equ es t ed trail e a se me nt, and en s urin g t hat th e design c onservation report is d e t a il e d as to th e n egative as pects t hat nee d t o be c orrec ted and the pos iti ve features that n eed to b e preserv ed . Schoen zeit stated t he Planning Commiss io n h eard som e compe llin g reason s again st rem ov in g the curb c ut for the n e ighb o r th at is no t p art o f t he deve lo pm e nt a nd a ddin g some m ore trees to th e buffer a s propose d fo r other areas. Coffma n indi cat e d he is agreeabl e with that. Page 9 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, March 11, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT 7. #13-3591 ERVIN WACHMAN -OUTLOT C BAYSIDE FARMS 2ND - SUBD/PRELIMLNARY PLAT -RESOLUTION NO. 6209 Ervin Wachman, Applicant, and Bill Coffman, Coffman Development, were present. Curtis stated Ervin Wachman requests prel iminary plat approval to create five new, 2+ acre buildable lots and a private road from the original 13 + acres. 1. Lot I is proposed to contain 3.74 acres total; 3.05 acres dry, buildable and 0.69 acres wetland. 2. Lot 2 is proposed to contain 2.26 acres total; 2.25 acres dry, buildable and 393 square feet (0.009 acre) of wetland. 3. Lot 3 is proposed to contain 2.34 acres total dry, buildable area. 4. Lot 4 is proposed to contain 2.16 acres total ; 2.02 acres dry, buildable and 0.14 acre storm pond. 5. Lot 5 is proposed to contain 2.06 acres total ; 2.01 acres dry, buildable and 0 .05 acre storm pond. All of the lot s would be se rved by a new private road with cul-de-sac extending southerl y from Bayside Road (CSAH 84). All lot s would b e served by private septic system s and private we ll s. On February 19 , 2013 t he Planning Commission voted 5 to Oto recomme nd approval of the preliminary plat contingent upon consulting City Engineer approval of the revised plans, consistent with the staff reco mmendation s and with the following conditions: 1. Revise the landscape plan to include additional, s imilar native trees to be planted along the entire southern property boundary showing a tree preservation easement. This has been compl eted. 2 . Rev ise the la ndscape plan to reflect removal of invasive species as id entified within the KES conservation design re port. This has been done . 3. Address on-going ma intenance and removal of invasive specie s within the HOA documents. This has been address ed. 4. Only the va riance for the cul-de-sac length was acceptable. All other code req uirements must be met with re v ised plans. 5. Geffre curb cut to b e addressed, if nee ded, by Hennepin County . 6. The revi sed plans should reflect a trail easement 10 feet in width abutting Bayside Road. An easement exh ibit has been provided by the developer. The applicants hav e submitted revised plans as directed which have been reviewed and approved by the consulting C ity E ngineer. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat according to the attached resolution. Page 10 of 27 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,March 11,2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (7. #13-3591 ERVIN WACHMAN-OUTLOTC BAYSIDE FARMS z"D _ SURD/PRELIMINARY PLAT-RESOLUTION NO. 6209, Continued) The Council s hould consider adopting the attached resolution approving the preliminary plat. Levang asked if the Geffres have been notified of the email that has been received today. Curtis indic ated they have not and that they are not technically a part of this application. Curtis indicate d she will be in communication with the Geffres but that she does not have the ir email address. Curtis noted the email has been provided to th e applicant. McMillan asked if the reso lu t ion contains language to the effect that the Geffres need to hook their driveway into the new road. Curtis indicated it doe s. McMillan asked if they were the homeowners then a s well. Curtis indicated the Geffres signed that agreement. M cMillan asked if th e one shade tree for every 40 feet of road frontage is in the code or the co nservati on design. C urtis in dic ated it is in the C ity's Co de under subdi v isions . McMillan asked what the road fr ontage is defin ed a s it relates to the p lanting of the t rees. C urtis state d it would be the frontage along the n ew priva te road that is created . C urti s displayed the land scap e plan o n the overhead. C urti s po inte d out the locatio n of the proposed trees. McMillan asked if the tree preservation was put in the re soluti on . Curtis stated the applicant did provide a report and a plan which is wh at is referred to in the resolution. M cMill an asked what would hap pen o nce th e trees die along the ro ad and con servation easement. Curtis stated th e trees protected under the co nservation easement are exi sting trees and th e conservation easem ent would prev ent the cutting and removal of those trees. C urti s indicated if t h ey di e naturall y, she is n ot sure of a provi sion in the plan on w hether additional trees wo uld be ad ded. The applicant is providing the C ity w ith the homeowne r assoc iati on d ocument s but the City is n ot in volved in t hat. In the areas w here there is invasiv e s pec ies remo val , th e re are plantings propo se d for those areas. Mattick state d he oftentimes w ill quickly rev iew the h om eowne r association documents but that he does no t do much more than that sin ce the C ity is not involve d w ith that. The C ity ty pi call y will require replacement of a tree if it dies w ithin two years of planting, but if a tree dies five years from now, the City wo uld not go o ut and enforce t he planting of a new tree. L evan g aske d if the pines trees are intended t o stay a lo n g Bayside. Page 11 of 27 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, March 11, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. {7. #13-3591 ERVIN WACHMAN-OUTLOT C BAYSIDE FARMS 2ND - SUBDIPRELIMINARY PLAT-RESOLUTION NO. 6209, Continued) Curtis asked if the trees are proposed spruce trees or existing. Coffman indicated those are proposed trees. Curtis stated in the area where the new driveway will be located, she is not sure specifically where the trees are in relation to that and whether they are on the subject property or the neighboring properties. Coffman stated the existing trees are in the middle of the new private road, which will require the removal of three or four spruce trees. McMillan asked how the access piece should be addressed. Curtis stated the resolution requires approval be received from Hennepin County as part of the final plat. Mattick indicated the reasoning behind the wording is that the hookup is to a county road and Hennepin County would need to approve that and that it is not a city requirement. If the county approves the driveway access, from Staffs perspective they would be okay with that access, which is along the lines of the original resolution. If the access is denied by the county, some other arrangement would need to be worked out. Levang asked if Hennepin County is okay with the access. Curtis indicated they are supportin g the City 's 1994 documents, but that the e-mail does not re ally provide any directions besides indicating they support the C ity's original resolutions. Levang asked who would make that application to the county. Curtis indicated the developer would. Anderson moved, Printup seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6209, a Resolution Approving The Preliminary Plat for the Property Located at Outlot C, Bayview Farms 2"d Addition. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. ..o:.u.L,.n...<'\. HOMES ON ALF OF BRIAN & ANC -RE H BUTTERFIEL~SS nG~ng 5 Watertown Page 12 of 27 Council Notes 031113 7 Item Description: #13-3591, Ervin Wachman , Outlot C, Bayview Farms 2 nd Addition PIO 06-117-23-22 -0018 (also Outlots B & D PIDs 06-117-23-22-0012 & 06-117-23-22-0014) Preliminary Plat of Bayside Meadows-Resolution Application Summary: In 1994 the current configuration of Bayview Farms 2 nd Addition was platted to allow for access to and development of the 13 acre Outlot C. This application contemplates a preliminary plat to create five new, 2+ acre buildable lots and a private road from the original 13± acres . All of the lots would be served by a new private road with cul-de -sac extending southerly from Bayside Road (CSAH 84). All lots would be served by private septic systems and private wells . With the exception of the variance requested to allow the cul-de-sac to be 1053 feet in length where the code requires 1000 feet maximum the applicant's proposal meets or will meet City code requirements for minimum lot size, stormwater management, sewage treatment, landscaping, wetland protection and conservation design.~. On February 19, 2013 the Planning Commission voted 5 to Oto recommend approval of the preliminary plat contingent upon City Engineer approval of the revised plans and consistent with the staff recommendations. They added the following conditions: 1. The landscape plan was to be revised to include additional native trees to be planted along the entire southern property boundary showing a tree preservation easement. This has been completed. 2. The landscape plan was to be revised to reflect removal of invasive species as identified within the conservation de sign report. This has been done . 3. The HOA documents should address on-going maintenance and removal of invasive species. This has been addressed. 4. All other code requirements must be met with revised plans. Only the variance for the cul-de -sac length was acceptable. 5 . Geffre curb cut to be addressed, if needed, by Hennepin County. 6 . A 10-foot trail ea sement abutting Bay sid e Road should be provided . An easement exhibit has been provided by the developer. T he applicants have submitted revised plans as directed which have been reviewed and approved by the consulting City En gineer. St aff re commends approval of the preliminary plat acco rding to the attached resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Tonight the Council should con sider adopting or amending the draft resolution . Melanie Curtis From : Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Hi Melanie , Carla .Stueve@co.hennepin.mn.us Monday, March 11 , 2013 7 :56 AM Melanie Curtis Robert.Byers@co.hennepin.mn.us; Steve .Groen@co.hennepin.mn.us; Eric.Drager@co.hennepin .mn .us; Julie.Bowman@co.hennepin.mn.us RE: Preliminary Plat Review -Outlot C , Bayside Meadows 2nd Addition We have discussed this driveway access issue again internally, and the County feels strongly that consolidation of these existing driveways (4665 and 4645 Bayside Road) should occur with the development of Outlot C and the proposed access via Outlots B and D. The original platting of these outlots was contingent on the property owners agreeing to this access arrangement and this agreement was signed by the property owners in the City Council resolution (No. 3492). Consolidation of the access driveways is also important for traffic flow and safety reasons . Based on the County's access management guidelines, a 1/8-mile (660 feet) access spacing is recommended along this roadway. Allowing the existing driveway access for 4665 Bayside Road and the proposed access for Outlot B would provide an approximate spacing of 150 feet. In addition, consolidation of access driveways along Bayside Road has been demonstrated in the past (for example, the properties immediately to the west: 4775 , 4755 and 4725 Bayside Road) and the County would support continuing this practice. For these reasons , the County is in complete favor of upholding the City Council resolution that was signed by the property owners in October 1994. We would not support maintaining the existing driveway at 4665 Bayside Road with an additional driveway access on Outlot 8 . Thank You! Carla Carla Stueve, P.E. I Transportation Engineer Hennepin County Transportation Department 11600 Prairie Drive I Medina, MN 55340 Office 612.596 .03561 Cell 612.868 .66771 Email carla.stueve@co .hennepin.mn .us From : Melanie Curtis <MCurtis@ci.orono.mn .us> To: '"Carla .Stueve@co.hennepin.mn.us"' <Carla.Stueve@co.hennepin.mn.us> Date : 03/04/2013 03:02 PM Subject: RE : Preliminary Plat Review -Outlot C, Bayside Meadows 2nd Addition Carla I wanted to touch base with you on this request before our City Council reviews it (on Monday). Our Planning Commission reviewed the attached REVISED plat on Feb 19th. The PC acknowledged your comments and the comments from the Geffres at 4665 Bayside Road (attached). The PC recommended that, as the driveway at 4645 Bayside Road IS going to be relocated to the new private road they would leave the matter of the Geffre driveway up to Hennepin County's discretion. My email today is to inquire as to what steps the County would take to cause the Geffre driveway to be relocated , if any . Thanks for your time and if this is easier to discuss on the phone please feel free to give me a call. Melanie 1 Melanie Curtis Planning & Zoning Coordinator City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Direct Dial: 952.249.4627 Fax: 952.249.4616 Planning & Zoning Office 952 .249.4620 Email: mcurtis@ci.orono .mn.us Website: www.ci.orono.mn .us City of Orono Office Hours Monday -Friday 8 :00 am -4 :30 pm -----Original Message----- From: Carla .Stueve@co.hennepin.mn.us [mailto:Carla.Stueve@co.hennepin .mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, February 12 , 201311:12 AM To: Melanie Curtis Cc: Robert.Byers@co .hennepin .mn.us; Steve.Groen@co.hennepin .mn.us Subject: Preliminary Plat Review -Outlot C , Bayside Meadows 2nd Addition Hi Melanie, Thank you again for sending us the preliminary plat for the Bayside Meadows 2nd Addition (Outlot C), located south of CSAH 84 (Bayside Road), east of CSAH 19. We discussed this at the county Plat Review Committee today. Based on our review, the county continues to support consolidation of these driveways. Allowing two closely spaced driveways would not be recommended for traffic flow and safety reasons. CSAH 84 (Bayside Road) is classified as a collector roadway , which would require 1/8-mile (660 feet) access spacing based on our county access spacing guidelines. Since this will require a future permit, we are currently researching the original permit for the L 1-B1 property to determine what was included for access to this property, since that may be used as a basis for the future permit. Please let me know if you need anything further from us prior to your Planning Commission meeting next week. Thank You! Carla Carla Stueve , P.E . I Transportation Engineer Hennepin County Transportation Department 11600 Prairie Drive I Medina, MN 55340 Office 612.596 .0356 I Cell 612 .868 .6677 I Email carla.stueve@co.hennepin .mn.us Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney-client or work product privilege , may be confidential , privileged , proprietary , or otherwise protected , and the unauthorized review, copying , retransmission , or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited . If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. [attachment "admin@ci .orono.mn.us_20130304_ 155231.pdf' deleted by Carla J Stueve/PW/Hennepin] [attachment "4.0 2 LAND USE APPLICATION ESCROV/~~EMEN:A' fl..~ Application # I ?z -2~L AGREEMENT made this ~ day of /U'l fl IL l?, between the CITY OF ORONO , a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and _l,.,£6~.!..:-.:........:~~.a:...:..~:::.:....::....::......1-. _______ _ [a corporation -optiona~ ("Owners"). Rec itals 3. The City is willing to commence its review of the application and incur costs associated with said review only if the Owners establish an escrow to ensure reimbursement to the City of its costs . NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS : 1. DEPOSIT OF ESCR~NDS. Contemporaneously with the execution of this Escrow Agreement, the Owners shall deposit$ -with the City. All accrued interest, if any, shall be paid to the City to reimburse the City for its cost in ad inistering the escrow account. 2. PURPOSE OF ESCROW. The purpose of the escrow is to guarantee reimbursement to the City for all out-of-pocket costs the City has incurred (including planning, engineering, or legal consultant review) or will incur in meeting with tl?i Owners, ~viewing the plan s, and preparing agenda packet material for City Council review of application # -a'??:?11 . Elig ible expenses shall be consistent with expenses the Owners would be responsible for under a zoning and subdivision application . 3. MONTHLY BILLING. As the City receives consultant bills for incurred costs, the City will in turn send a bill to the Owners. Owners shall be responsible for payment to the City within 30 days of the Owners' rece ipt of bill . 4. DISBURSEMENT FROM ESCROW ACCOUNT . In the event that the Owners do not make payment to the City within the timeframe outlined in #3 above, shall cease all reviews until the Owners pay all e xpenses invoiced pursuant to #3. The City may draw from the escrow account without further approval of the Owners to reimburse the City for eligible ex penses the City has incurred . 5. CLOSING ESCROW. T he Balance on deposit in the escrow, if any, shall be returned to the Owners when the review has been completed . 6. CERTIFY UNPAID CHARGES . If the project is abandoned by Owners , or if the eligifile~xpenses incurred by the City exceed the amount in escrow, the City shall have the right to certify the unpaid b'alance to the subject property pursuant to Minn . Stat.§§ 415.01 and 366 .012. \ \ ' \ \ OWNER, \ ::TY'l'MOY D --~ . Its: __ r-_:_..J_~_v_L...___· ==ob"-_ ........ ·, _,-"""'<...=-L-=· A_u_r __ Its: Internal Use Only: C Original to Finance Deparbnent C Copy to Zon i ng FIie Cl Copy to Street File I I I I I I \ l I \ \. City of Oror,o 275{) Kelley Parkway Oror,o MN 55356 Receiot No: 3.00B325 952-249-4600 Jar, 23, 2.'013 Ervi n Wachraar, Plarmir,g arid ZonimJ Escmi oeposit -Out lot C 10,000.00 Bayview Farm Secor,d Add1 t ion 101 -22205 Defer~ed Rev-Dev~loper Deposit Plarmrng arid Zor,rng Subd -Out lot C Ba yview 21 4B4 . 00 Farm Second Additior, 101-34420 Ccirid Use-Variance -Dev Fees Total : Check Check No: 4214 Pavor: Ervir1 Wachraar1 Teotal Applied: Char:g e iendered : 01/23/2013 10 :48AM 12,484.00 12,484.00 12,484.00 .00 Melanie Curtis From: Melanie Curtis Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Wednesday , February 06 , 2013 8:33 AM 'Coffman , William D' 'melissa@kjolhaugenv.com'; 'Bob Molstad' Wachman #13-3591 Conservation Design Bill -I indicated I'd be in touch after we had a chance to go through your materials more thoroughly . Our engineer has nearly completed the review of the preliminary plat and called to inform me this AM that it appears the Conservation Design plan is incomplete or missing. The report from Kjolhaug does hit the high points but it appears recommendations or detailed plans are lacking. In short, the Conservation Design element of the application is incomplete. This is a critical part of the preliminary plat review and is required for the planning commission's review . Were you expecting a more comprehensive plan from Kjolhaug? If we receive it today we could keep your application on the February PC agenda because our engineer could still review it and provide comments to me in time. I have a couple meetings today but am in the office if you have questions. Melanie Melanie Curtis 11 952 .249.4627 ~ mc urtis@ci.orono.mn .us From: Coffman , William D [mailto:BillCoffman @C BBurnet.com ] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 9:26 AM To: Melanie Curtis Cc: MICHELLE JEUB Subject: RE : #13-3591 letter Hi Melanie, I'll get you the original signatures as soon as they return from Arizona. Also, I had a very good meeting yesterday on site with both Irv Geffre and Eric Sims regarding tree removal, grading limits etc. The Geffres still do not want to extend their drive to our new road though, but both of them seem to understand and agree with all other issues, at least for now. Thanks again, Coffman Development Services, Inc. Cell 612-202-0692 I Fax 952-473-3932 Email billcoffman@ cbburnet.com CBB I 201 East Lake Street I Wayzata, MN 55391-1695 Website www.wdco ffman .co m -------. COLDWeLL. BANl(eR~ BURNET 1 Melanie Curtis From: Sent: To: Bob Molstad [molstad@sathre.com] Tuesday, February 12, 2013 8:46 AM Melanie Curtis Cc: Coffman, William D Subject: FW: Bayside Meadows -Response 021213 Attachments: Wach-Lot Areas 021213.pdf; Wach-SP Updated 021213 .pdf; Wach -275' Radius Exhibit 021113.pdf Melanie, Attached are a few PDF files for your use/review. The first PDF shows the area summary for each lot, per our discussion yesterday. I did twist the lot line of Lot 3/4 to provide 2.03 acres of "dry" area for Lot 4, to account for the ponding on Lot 4. The second PDF is the updated site plan. Showing the lot line shift and the total lot areas have been updated. The third PDF shows a 275' radius overlay for the 30 mph design standard. The proposed site plan has a 100' design radius for the private roadway, this radius is necessary to maintain the 2.0 acre minimum lot size for the RR -lB zoning district for the three lots on the west side of the roadway. The centerline alignment within the existing Outlot D of Bayfield Farms 2"d Addition is angled, due to this existing condition we are proposing the 100' radius. The length of the curve is only+/-130 feet, then you enter a straight tangent and then a 300 foot curve as you proceed south toward the cul-de-sac. The fire marshal has concerns with the private street width (26 foot vs the 20 foot proposed) and the island within the cul-de-sac. To address these two concerns and the proposed 100' radius, we would propose to post the east side of the private roadway as no parking from sta 10+00 to the county road. Also we can sign the 100' curve, if requested. For the cul-de-sac we would propose to increase the paved width from 24 feet to 26 feet and still provide the 2' gravel shoulder on both the inner and outer edges, providing a 30' travel surface around the cul -de-sac. In the inner island we would mound this area up a few feet and not have any landscaping plantings within 4 feet of the gravel edge. Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional data, prior to the PC meeting next Tuesday. Thanks, Bob Robert S . Molstad, P.E. President SATHRE-BERGQUI ST, INC . 150 So ut h B roadway Wayzata , Mn. 5539 1 Ph : 952-476-600 0 Cell : 6 12-247-7005 The ele<trornc dala conveyed b y SAT HRE BERGO Uk, r IN (, IS 11 , the e 1p11 nl' ,eference, nly Th, mat e11,il 1, copyrighl pro tected The r ec.,p,,•nt a9rees b y 11, receipt of electro,uc 1nfon,at m n to not ott er the electron ic data The rec1p1e11t agr .. e b y h,~ recerpt 01 th • dat st t the inform h~ r:ont a 1ned in the tran rm son may b cha nged V.'l ttJJ ut r1ohf1cat1on of th e 1ec1p1f;>nt Thr e lectronic 1n format 1on is not tr a ce1t11 1ed ve 1s•or-of a pldn Rec1p,e nl aqrees t o hold SATHR~ BERGQUIST IN!, harmle s l ror m y ar-l I c laim ATHRE -El RGQUIST Inc ,at< 10 repre.ent atir,n or w cr;:,n11,, expr essed or ,rnp l<e<J w ith respect I<' the n: JS8 of llie data prov1derJ here lh1 th regard e s of ·ts f ormat Gr th 'll0 n s f 11 Iran ,mi ss1u f here 1~ 'lC 1uar tee or repre... 1tot1t n to the use1 s to the ace racy currM 1cy s1..utat)1hty or r e l18b1 1i1y cf 1h1s ct, ta for any purpose The 11se · .Jr:cepts lhe datA • as 1s: a nrJ nss imes all r1 k assr.ic1ate \'.1th tt usE! By acceptar a o f t hi s data U e u ser a,Jrees not t o tra r1 srn11 this. dat~ 0 1 pr ov1,-Je acce ss to it 01 any part ,t b > another µa11y u nless th 11,er st II 1r..lude w ith t~e <J al~ opy of t s d,scl mer SATHRE'-BERGQIJIST Inc .. ssumes n res ons1b11ty for actuill or consequ entia l ct arnage incurred as a esult of n y u(' •r' e hance on thts d.8ta 1 Melan ie Curtis From : Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Bob - Melanie Curtis Monday, February 11 , 2013 2:45 PM 'Bob Molstad' 'shellwachm@msn .com'; 'Coffman , William D' RE : Bayside Meadows In your plan revisions could you please assure your preliminary plat exhibit clearly identifies each lot's total acres and break into dry and wet square footages? It is much clearer for staff, Planning Commission and Council's reference. In the meantime, I am referring to Appendix A from your Development Narrative (1/23/13). Although I'm still not clear on the wet/dry square footage calculations for Lots 1, 2, 4 & 5 for my report summary . Should I subtract the wetland square footage from the lot area? It is not completely clear. And regarding Lots 4 & 5 I need the area of the storm water pond on each lot calculated and separated out from the dry buildable. Can you please provide this at your earliest convenience or direct me to the information I am looking for in your materials? Thanks. Melanie Curtis V 952 .249.4627 1:8J mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us From: Melanie Curtis Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 4:47 PM To: 'Coffman, William D' Cc: 'Bob Molstad'; 'melissa @kjolhaugenv.com'; 'shellwachm @msn.com' Subject: FW: Bayside Mead ow s Bill Please see our consulting City Engineer's comments, attached . Our engineer has provided comments and recommendations regarding the proposed development which should be addressed with your revised plans. There will not be sufficient time for you to submit plan revisions and have another eng ineering review prior to the preparation of the Planning Comm ission packet. However I would recommend p reparing to address any comments that the PC may bring up from the memo at the meeting. You should prepare revi sed plans following receipt of any additional direction given by the PC at the meeting on the 19th. I hope you've received the Fire Dept and MCWD comments I forwarded earlier. I am still waiting for comments from Hennepin County and will forward to you upon receipt; our Police department did not have any comments on the plans . A coup le pieces of information I would like you to provide/clarify prior to the meeting are: 1. The attached memo identifies that the radius of the roadway at one point is tighter than recommended and is quite steep. To aid in the PC's deci sion making process plea se provide an exhibit to me which illustrates the recommended minimum radiu s (275') overlaid on top of the proposed roadway . It would be helpful if I could receive this exhibit by or before Wednesday. 2 . The email from our Fire Chief indicated the need for in -home fire suppression sprinklers and/or a widened roadway . Plea se provide comments to me as to how you plan to address this moving forward. 3. The issue w ith the Geffre driveway should be addressed. The Bayview Farms 2 nd plat documentation indicates that they agree to "participate" in future development applications. We interpret this to mean that they should sign and participate in your application . At this point we still have an ex pectation that their driveway will be relocated. Pl ease let me know if you have a ny questions on the attached or on my direction. Melanie Curtis Planning & Zoning Coord inator City of Orono 2750 Ke ll ey Par kway 1 Melanie Curtis From: Melanie Curtis Sent: To: Cc: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 9:27 AM 'melissa@kjolhaugenv.com' 'Bob Molstad'; 'Coffman, William D' Subject: RE: Wachman #13-3591 Conservation Design Melissa -to follow up your voicemail: what I meant by "the conservation design element is missing" is that it appears you 've begun the inventory and analysis but haven 't completed the analysis and developed the plan . Beginning at Div ision 2 of our Conservation Design code (pasted below) is a list of the basic application & design requirements . I think your initial submittal dated 01/22/13 is essentially an inventory which doesn't reach the level of a Conservation Des ign Master Plan as required (and described beginning with Section 78-1635). We are looking for analysis, recommendations and a plan for this site . An example I can offer is that the conservation design process should happen before lots and roads, etc are laid out, not afterwards. On page 4 in your last paragraph you indicate that trees will be removed and that exact trees to be removed/protected are not known at this time. Your plan should identify recommendations for protection and possibly identify limits for tree removal which will assist in the design of the development. I have a short meeting at 930 but will be in the office most of the day. Melanie ARTICLE XII. -CONSERVATION DESIGN DIVISION 1. -GENERALLY DIVISION 2. -BASIC APPLICATION AND PLAN REQUIREMENTS DIVISION 3. -DENSITY BONUS STANDARDS DIVISION 4. -LONG -TERM PRESERVATION DIVISION 5. -RESOURCES Sec . 78 -1631. -Pu rpo se an d in t en t . Se c. 78-1632 . -A ppli ca bi lity . Sec. 78 -1633 . -Definit io ns. Sec. 78-1631. -Purpose and intent. DIVISION 1. -GENERALLY The City of Orono as a result of the Rural Oasis Study conducted in 2005 finds that there is an intrinsic link between the natural systems and the valued scenic character that exist throughout the community. The requirements of this conservation design ordinance are meant to preserve and enhance this ecological/aesthetic character by requiring: (1) protection and enhancement of drainageways and water quality; (2) protection and enhancement of ecological communities; (3) reinforcement and establishment of ecological connections throughout the city; (4) augmentation and preservation of viewsheds including corridor enclosure and buffering; (5) preservation and improvement of views ; and {6) preservation or reinterpretation of local landmarks. (Ord . No. 67 3rd series,§ 1, 1-11-2010) Sec. 78-1632 . -Applicability. The Conservation De sign Master Planning requirements of this article apply to all proposed residential subdivisions or multi-unit residential developments greater than five acres in total area or guided for urban den sity (greater than one unit per two acres). 1 Melanie Curtis From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Bill/Bob Melanie Curtis Tuesday, February 12 , 2013 1:48 PM 'Bob Molstad'; Coffman, William D 'Robert Bean' RE: Bayside Meadows -Response 021213 Thanks for the exhibits . Your exhibit illustrating the road curve really helps me understand the (engineering) challenges of the site better. That being said, I discussed your proposed road layout with our engineer and feel that, while a 100' radius might not be realistic, I need to see a better effort to lessen the slope and the curve radius. I do understand that this may result in some of the proposed lot lines being relocated/revised. Please provide me with a revised plan which comes closer to meeting Orono's road standards for paved width, slopes and curves, etc. If the lot lines are revised, please provide me with updated dry/wet area calculations for each lot. Without more information and analysis I don't feel confident that I can support the variances from Chapter 82 - Subdivision Regulations regarding the minimum requirement standards. Further I would not recommend nor do I foresee the Planning Commission moving an application forward to the City Council for preliminary plat review and approval where there are outstanding issues. I am not suggesting pulling the application from Tuesday's agenda ; however my recommendation to the Plann ing Commission will likely be to review the materials, provide feedback on the various elements of the plan and then table until March's meeting. Melanie Curtis tr 952.249.4627 ~ mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us From: Bob Molstad [mailto:molstad@sathre.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 8:46 AM To: Melanie Curtis Cc: Coffman, William D Subject: FW: Bayside Meadows -Response 021213 Melanie, Attached are a few PDF files for your use/review. The first PDF shows the area summary for each lot, per our discussion yesterday . I did twist the lot line of Lot 3/4 to provide 2.03 acres of "dry" area for Lot 4, to account for the ponding on Lot 4. The second PDF is the updated site plan. Showing the lot line shift and the total lot areas have been updated . The third PDF shows a 275' radius overlay for the 30 mph design standard. The proposed site plan has a 100' design radiu s for the private roadway, this radius is necessary to maintain the 2.0 acre minimum lot size for the RR-18 zoning district for the three lots on the west side of the roadway. The centerline alignment within the existing Outlet D of Bayfield Farms 2"d Addition is angled, due to this existing condition we are proposing the 100' radius. The length of the curve is only+/-130 feet, then you enter a straight tangent and then a 300 foot curve as you proceed south toward the cul-de-sac. The fire marshal ha s concerns with the private street width (26 foot vs the 20 foot proposed) and the island within the cul-de-sac. To address these two concerns and the proposed 100' radius, we would propose to post the ea st side of the private roadway as no parking from sta 10+00 to the county road. Also we can sign the 100' curve, if requested . For the cul-de-s ac we would propose to increase the paved width from 24 feet to 26 feet and still provide the 2' gravel shoulder 1 I I I I I I I • I I ~ c5 I o 1 ~ ~ () I ~ ol ~: ii ~= 0 n~ I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I J / OWNER: PETER & SHARON RENNEBOHM PID,¥-0611723210005 Vl :::1:0> vl8 :co 1-:::l -----ir~ I") ,,.. w < <"i --------1 !N" ---~::: ""-'° ' -I ' ~9-\ " ~ (.)~ '\ \ \ -(.J J ii:O:: \ ' ~--w J \ I I I i r l la 1f \ 111 / \'. r () • I .,s I li1 I, I 1-..:a \ I L ----J ' --· i I c ---1 I \ I L -----.1 I I OWNER : 4f I I I JAMES MORGAN & DEBRA PULFORD PIDf-0611723220022 DESIGN DAT A: STREET SECTION: 1.5" SPWEB2408 WEAR COURSE (MN DOT 23e0) 2.5" SPNWB230B BASE COURSE (MN DOT 23e0) 8" CL 5 AGGREGATE BASE (MN DOT 3138) SUBGRADE FABRIC (BOZ/SY, NON-WOVEN)(ln,qulred) 8" (2' wide) CL 7 AGGREGATE SHOULDER CROSS SECTION: 3%CRO....,., 1a PAVEMENT wtD'TH SITE DATA: ZONING: RR-1B MIN LOT AREA: 2 .0 AC MIN LOT WIO'TH: 200 FT FYSB-50FT SYSB -30FT SYSB STRT • 50 FT RYSB-50FT -MAX CDS LENG'TH -1000 FT OWNER : AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE PID,¥-0611723220021 2' AG GREGA TE SHOULDER 3 :1 DITCH SLOPE -MIN CURVE 275 FT 5025 0 2550 100 2' TYPICAL DITCH OEP'TH 3' TYPICAL DITCH WIDTH INSTAU. CULVERTS FOR EACH DRIVEWAY wt'TH HOME CONSTRUCTION L-...!D~E~SIGNE=!:.R -~:::4...!B:.:.Y..+-.::DAc:,:TE=----'1-----....:.R:.:EV.:..:;ISc;;IOc;.N;;:;,S ___ --I USE (INCLUDING COPYING, D ISTRIBUTION, ANO/OR CONVEYANCE OF RSM _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ INFORMATION)OFTHISPROOUCT ISSTRICTl.YPROHIBITEDWl'THOUT DRAWN BY SATHRE•BERGOUIS T , INC .'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZAT ION. USE wt'THOVT ------------SAID AU'THORIZATION CONSTIT\JTES AN IUEGITIMATE USE ANO SHALL 'THEREBY RSM CHECKED BY DATE 01-16-13 INDEMNIFY S A'THRE-B ERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-B ERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO H OLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGAU. Y RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. SCALE IN FEET I HEREBY CERTIFY 'THAT THIS PtAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANO THAT I AM A DIJLY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAi. ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF 'THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Robert S. Moi st , P.E . Oate: Lie. No. l:+':o-f + + + OWNER: JAMES & JULIE DZUBAY PID,¥-0611723220023 59 r-.- 1 I ,~ .:.-Ir !1~ I I I iii -, I I OWNER: BRADLEY PASS PID#-06117232 40001 . -·-..;: -, . -r-:.---.; Ii I -•--1 ..1.---~,-{~="l / L ~-ij /'\ !,v,,, \4,1 ....... . ....-"\.. / /, ......... ) < ~~ ,,,1 \ r _:;.,, / I 4.\ V//,t. I V I it ~ ~ cf ~i I I I I .. . i ~·o --I .. ,-- OWNER: ERIN SULLIVAN PID#-0611723220024 1 , I I R!CEIVI! Vl Vl < a. SHE ET INDEX TABLE DEVELOPER ERVIN WACHMAN 2135 Salem Court Long Lake. M;nneooto 55366 PROJECT CONSULTANT W ILLIAM COFFMAN Coffinan Devclopmcnl Services, Inc. Cdlulu 612-202-0692 Emoil:billco~com CITY PROJECT NO. Sheet SP EX AA pp GP ST LS A"rial I Description I Preliminary Site Plan I ExistinA Conditions Plan I Alta Survey I Preliminary Plat I Preliminarv Gradino & Erosion Control Plan I Preliminary Street Plan & Profile I Landscaoina Plans I APri<II -snn.-~e•h~ck Plan F ILE NO. 31202-070 SATHRE-BERGQUI ST, INC . ORONO, MINNESOTA PRELIMINARY S ITE PLAN BAYSIDE MEADOWS 150SOUTHBROADWAY WAYZATA,MN.55391 (952)471H5000 AIS ~ .-c CB caox ca. IE[ Tl O*I CIIH CONC CMP DIP EB [HH TRAN [IIH Elil rt1 FP n:s CASV en GIi COi. GP CYW HCS Dmotes Advmising-lnfonnatiooal Sign lxnotes Air Conditioning Unit Dmotes B~ement Floor Elevation Dwotes Catch Basin Denotes Curb Box Denotes Buik1mg Cohnm Deootes BuHding Entrance Elevatioo Dmote, Td<ICounn. Box/Ped Dmotes ColD.llllD.ication Handholc Denotes Col.WDJ.Ilication Manhole Dmotes Cooaete Surface DeDOles Corrugated Metal Pipc'Size Dtnoles Ductile Iron Pipet'Size Dmotes Elecuic Box Dmoles Elocttic Handbole Dmotes Electric Transfonner Dulotes Elu:tric Manhole Dmotes Electric Meler Dmotes Fire Hookup Dmotes Flag Pole Denotes Flart.d End Section/Size Denotes Gti Valve Denotes Garage Aoor Elevatioo Dcooles Gas Mdf.2' Denotes Ground Light DmotesGuan.1Post Dmotes Guy Wire Denotes Handicap Panci.Dg Sign HYO Dc:notcs Fire Hydrant U' Denote, Light Pole Ml Dalotes Mailbox NOP Dmotes No Parking Sign CHU Denotes Overhead Ulility Line Pl($ Dc:notes Parking Sigp fllY Dmotes Post Indicator Valve RCP Denotes Re-inforced Concrt1c Pipe/Size 1111) l)(notcs Roof Drain SC0 Dmote, Sawtaty Oeanout SltlH Dmotcs Sawtaty Manhole 5V Deoo!<S Sq,tic Vatt STP Dmote, Stop Sign STMH Dmotes Stonn Manhole TRS Dmotes Traffic; Coottol Sign TL Dm01es Traffic Light UGC Denotes Uod t2'ground ColDDlWlication Line UG[ Dwotes Undaground Electric Line UGC l>a>oles Uoottground Gas Line SAM Dalotes Uodttground Sanitary Sewer ST DaiotesUnda groundStoru1 Sewcr UI' Dmotes Utility Pole UI.I' Dmotcs Utility/Light Pole TNH Dmotes Top Nut of Hydrant Oa:!.otes WataManbole -WV IICT A-t OmOles Water Valve Dm0les Wdlaod Ddtncatioo/Flag ldattilit:r Ocootes Existing Comour ~DmOle, Proposed Con1our • Dmotes Found Mouwnm, . As DmotOO @ 0 Dmtoes Found Cast -lroo -Monwmnt Dmotcs 1/2" by 14" Iron Pipe S" and Marl<ed by Liceose No. 40344 IIOltrH 80 40 40 80 SCALE IN FEET 160 \ \ \ --- DRAWN BY J-......!:D:;E,2Sl~G~N"ER~-~~t-B~Y:....,i--,:D:::A~T,:;;E""-i------'RC::E:.;Va;tS"IO;;;Na;S;_ ____ ----i ~i~~~wg~~~~~~~~~~6~1~i;~~~~~~;.oR':,~?B~ro:~~~T ------------SATHRE-BERGQUI ST,!NC.'sEXPRESSWRITIENAUTHORIZATIO N, USE WITHOUT DBP CHECKED BY DBP DATE 01/1 7/13 SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITU TES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY tNDE MNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF AU RESPONSIBILITY. SATHR E-BERGQUIST, INC. RESE RVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY IUEGITIMATE US ER OR PARTY LEGA LLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAG ES OR LO SSES RE SUL TING FROM ILLEG ITMATE USE. (COl Th.hv ROAD NO. 84 ) ::: .. ]~r.tRS ::R!:tK --------- I I _J_ SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYlATA. MN. 55391 (Q52)471J.eOOO DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY O\a.lot C. except theNonh 123.00 feetoftbeW<:$1 148.50 feet ofOutlot C. BAYVIEW FARMS2ND ADDffiON, Hau,epin . SITE ADDRESS Unassigned -Orooo, Minnesota 553S9 This survey does not pwpon IO show any undcrgroUDd utilities. The source of information from plans and markings will be combined with obstrved evidence of militics to devdop a vie,.v of those uoderground utilities. However, lacbng excavation, the exact locatioo of wxlerground features ca.noot be accun.tely, co~etdy aod reliably dq)icted. Where aMitional or tooredctailOO informalioo is required, the diem is advised th.11 excavatioD may be necessary. The contractor sh.all detcnnine the exact klcatioo of any and all aisling utilities before co~ work. The contractor shall be fully responsible for any and~ damages arising out of bis fail we to cxaaly loc.1!e and protea all existinguailityfacilities. Coouet GOPHER STATE ONE CALL at 651-454-0002 for precise onsiteJocatioo of utilities prio, to aoy excavation. CUstom Home Builders Title, LLC, .ll issuing agent for Old Republic National Title InsuranceC.O~y commitmmt for title insurance file No. HB-2505&, effective date ofDecemba 3, 2012, was rdied upon as to mattus of record. The subject property appears to lie within ZooeX, (area of areM outside the )-percent .!lllnua) cb3oce floodplain, treas of I% annual chance shed flow flooding where average dtptbs ilTC less than I foot, areas o f 1 % anaual chance stream flooding where lhecootributiog drainage area is less tban I square mile, or areas protected &om the 1% annual clLance flood by levee.. No Base Flood Elevations or depths are shown within this zone. ~ purchase is ooc required in the5e zooes.), per the National flood lnsurmce Program, Flood Insurance Rate Map C.OllllDJllity Panel No. 27053C0285E, dated Sep(ember 2, 2004 a, acquired fiom the federal Emcrgmcy Man,gemeot Ageocy Web Site. Area Inf0nna1 ion : ~ Area • 597.643 Sq. Ft. -13.72Aacs Current zoning and setback infonoatioo: Zoning: RR-18 -0neFa mily Rural Resid<ntial Bw.lding Setbaeks: Front Yard -50 fet< Rear Yard -50 r ... Side Yard -30 feet I Strec! • .SO feet •Zooing and Setback information provided by the Planning Deparuneni oftheCityofOrono. Survey coordioate and bearing basis : Htnncpin Cow1y Coordinale ~ No modifications to thi s survey or sko:cb may be performed by any pa-son other thao the surveyor signing this certification or pcnoos under his direa supcrviiion. Thi s drawin8 and data Js protected by fedC!'al copyright Laws. I~ r eproduction and redistribution without proper consmt is prohibit<Xl BCllWll.Wk: MNOOT Geooebc Control Statioo YI 17 RE SET • Maple Plain Elevation • 1013.43 feet (NGVD29) TITLE COMMITMENT NOTES: 10. Parcel subject to utility and drainage easements ~ shown oo the plat ofBAYVIEW FARMS 2ND ADDITION. 11 . Parcel sul:ject to tmns and conditions of Flowage and Conservation Easement and Waiver of Damages, in favor oftbe City o f Orono, which grants the right to restrict the use, iq>rovcnau.s and devdoptnmt over the wetlands as shown on the plat of BAYVIEW FARMS, filed on Fehuary 12, 1980, as Doauncot No. 1371023. (Defined as Ras shown on the plat of BAYVIEW FARMSj. 12. Paree) subject to tmos and conditioos of Road and Utilities Easement for public iD g,'(SS, egres.s.. access, road and utilities pwposcs , ill favor of City of Orono, as created io document dated Ocrobcr 28, 1994, filed November 29, 1994, as Documait No. 2570025. (Ovtt Oullot D, BA YV1EW FARMS 2NDADDITION) 13. Parcel subject to t<X'lm and conditions of Road and Utilities E.a.set.nen1s for ~ic ingress,. egress, access, road and utilities purposes, io favor of City ofOrooo. as creatOO in document da.ttd Ocotba- 28, 1994, filed November 29, 1994, as Documa1t No. 2570026. (OvttOutlot B, BAYVIEW FARMS 2NDADDffiON) 14. Access co the subject property is limited over s,ublic ease.nan in favor of the City ofOrooo. IS. Parcel subject to wetlands which may be subject 10 faleral. state, or k>cal. regulation. Parcel subject to tmil$ aod conditions for Driveway Easanent ova Outlot B, BAYVIEW FARMS 2ND ADDITION, in favor of Loi I , Block 1, BA YVJEW FARMS 2ND ADDITTON. (Sbown on Catificate of Title) This is to cenify to ERVIN WACHMAN, IR., LAKE COMMUNITY BANK, Cl.5TOM HOME BUILDERS 1Tl1.E COMPANY and OlD REPUBLIC NATIONAL lTILE INSURANCE COMPANY that tbismap or platandthcSW\.-ey on which it is ba!lCd were made in acettdux:,c with the 20 11 Minimum Standard Dctail RcQuin::me:nls for ALTNACSM Laod litlc Surveys, jointly establ.ish!:d and a<klp1cd by ALTA andNSPS . The field work was completed on l'>ecaobcr l&, 201 2. David B. Pembaton, Professional Land Surveyor Minnesota Licmsc 40344 TWP.117 -RGE.23-SEC.06 HENNEPIN COUNTY . BOOK XXXIPAGE XXX ORONO, MIN NE S OT A ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE S URVEY IRVIN WACHMAN, JR., LAKE COMMUNITY BANK CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE, LLC OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANC E CO . FIL E NO. 31202-070 NOR1'H 80 40 40 80 SCALE IN FEET WET A-1 Denotes Wetland D<lincatiorvFiac Identifier --980 Denotes Existing O>IIIOUr ~Denotes Proposod Coroour • Denotes Found Monument . As Denoted (t) 0 Dentoes Found Cast • Jron • Mo[IJJl)Cl'd Denotes 1/2" by 14" Iron Pipe SCI and Marl<ed by License No. 40344 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: _s_ NOT TO SCALE Bein& S feet in width and adjoinin& lot lines. unlcssotherwise indicoted. and IO feet in width and adjoinirc rial" of way lines, unJess otherwise indicated. as Sm>wn on the plat ;---l I I I I I I I I I I I ~ ----- Kil l 1s ... ,L i I .-I I I I I ..,, I I OWN(~: ,..,. tRW. • MARJC>fttt CCF'f'RE P!.DI-OS1 1 '1:2l 220017 LOT I r::1 ~ BUX::K ! B AYVIEW __ , i i BH3 11 D,1145 sq. ft. ~·--· 2.75ac= I J} •Hll aS, 245.2 Z R•JIJ .J S A-44o49•:;.4• LOT I , BLOC'K.2 FARMS I I _L L -.o.r' I -----r---,_,...,h~8 ;:..;'ka.· ..... -----1...i------·---..i ... _· _________ : ~=l.~_-;:_ - Jr,}.-"'°' 01IN£R: SB(l 0 J7'C7"\t/ 657.56 -R: lfD ,. ~ .EFTREY A: PATlttO A. THULL C.A. ARWSTROMC: PASS a 8.J. PASS Plllf-0811723230019 PI0,-0811723230021 .1 l-~D~E::S!!:IG~N~E:!R~~...!!~+-,:Bc;Y~t"':CDc:A:cTEc::':+-:-::==:;--;;:;--'R-"EV=IS:.;IO=NS;:._ ____ ---j US E (INCLUDING COP YING , OISTRIBUTION, ANO/OR CONVEYANCE OF DBP 01/21/13 ADD OUTLOT _ _ _ _ _ :~R~=~l;l~~~:~;;~~:"!~.'~~=~E W1THOl/T I hereby certify that this swvey, plan or repon was prepared by me or under my direct supavision and that I un a duly Licffll<II Lll1d Surveyo, ..-lhc: laws of the State ofM.irn::sota. DRAWN BY DBP CHECKED BY DBP DATE 01/17/13 SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITU TES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY IND EMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONS IBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC . RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESUI. TING F ROM ILLEGITMATE USE. Dated this 2~ day t~· 2013. -l,, ... --:, David B. Pcmbcnon, Professional L..aR1 Surveyor Minnesota License No. 40344 SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA , MN . 553D1 (952) 476-6000 DESCRlPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY Outlot C, except the Nonh 123.00 feet of lhc: West 14&.SO feetof0u1lot C. BA YV1EW FARMS 2ND ADDITION, Hennepin . SITE ADDRESS Unassigned· Orono, Minnesota SS3S9 NOTES This survey does not purport to show any underground utilities. The ,ourcc of infi>rmation from plans~ nwkings will be combined with observed cvidc:nc;c: of utilities lO develop a view ofth.,se uokrJroond utihDCS. Howevtt, lackinc excavation. the cxaa loCltioo of undcrpow,d fcatwcs ~ be lCWllll<ly, 0011111etcly ml reliably dq,iacd. Whc:re addition.al or more detailed infonnation is required. the client is :advised d\11 excavation may be necessary. The contractor shall detcnninc the CJ.act location of any &rd all ciistirig utilities bd>rc comncncing work. The mnb'acior shall be fully responsible for any and all dama&es arisincoutofhis failwe » cuctly locate andprolCCt all existina utility facilities. Contact GOPHER STATE ONE CALL at 6Sl-4S4-0002 for pnci,eo"5itc loationofutilibespnonoany c:x.cavation CUstom Home Builders TitJc. LLC, as issuin& agent for Old Republic National TiUc Insurance Coff1)3tt}' commitment fortiUc insurance file No. HB·250S8. cffc:ctivcdatc:ofOocc:nm 3,2012, wasrd.icduponas bmattm: of record. The subject property appears IO lie within Zone X, (area of areas outside the i .pcn:mt a.noual chanc:c floodplain. ~of I% annual chanceshcel flow f1oodinc whercavcrqedepChs are less than I foot, areas of I% anwalchancc stream floodina where the oontn1,uting draina&e area is less than I -mile. or l!QS proloaed from lhc: I% annual chanc:c Oood by levec:s. No Base Flood Elevations ordq)ths arc shown within this z:onc. lnsurancepurchase is oot required in these zones.), per the National Fk>od lmurancc ProlJ'lf1\ Flood Insurance Rate Map C.Omrrunity Panel No. 27053C028SE, dal<d Scpt<mbc< 2, 2004 as acquired from the f ed<r>l Effl<rl<ncy Mana&crncnt A&fflCY Web Site. Arc.a lnlonnation : Lot Arca • 597,643 Sq . ft -13.72 Acres Current zonin& and sdback imonmtion: Z<>ning: RR -18 . One Family Run! RCS>dcmial Buikli.ng Setbacks: Front Yard -50 feec Rear Yan!. SO feet Side Y ud • 30 feet / St=t -SO feet •Z.,ning and Setback infonnation provided by the Planning Dcpanrncnt of the City of Orono. Swvey coordinate and bearing buis : H<mq>in County Coordina1c Base No mo<llflcations t0 this survey or sketch may be perfonncd by aJrj person othc:r than the swvcyor signing tru:s certification or persons under his d~ect .._,,isio1L This drawing ml data is pc-.cd by fedml a,pyriaiht laws. Its reproduction and redistribution withoul proper a>nsad is pro~ Benchmark: MN DOT Gc:odcric Control Station YI 17 RESET · Maple Plain Elevation • 1013.43 feet(NGVD29) TlTLE COMMITMENT NOTES: 10. Parcel subject 10 utility ml drainage cascmcntsasshowoon lhc:pl.atof BAYVIEWFARMS 2ND ADDITION. 11. Parcel subject IO terms and conditionsofFlowagcandConsavltion EascmeNand Wiivt:t of Damages. in favor of the City of Orono, which grants the rigN m rcsb'ict the use. ~vcmcnts and development over the wetlands as shown on the plat of BAYVIEW FARMS, filed on February 12, 1980, as Oocwncnt No. 137 1023. (Defined as "as shown on lhc:pl.atofBA YVIEW FARMSj. 12. Parcel subject IO terms and oonditions of Road and Utilities Easancntfi>f pubticirw=,cci=, access. road and utilities putpOSC$.. in favor of City of Oro~. as ett:atcd in doc:umcnt dalcd Ocloba" 28, 1994, filed November 29, 1994, a, Document No. 2S7002S. (Ovtt Outlot 0 , BAYVIEW FARMS 2ND ADDITION) 13. 14. 15. Parcel subject IO tcrms and conditions of Road and Utilities Easemails for p,blic irw=, cci=, access, road and utilities purposes, in favor of City of Orono, as created in document dated Ocotber 28, 1994, filed November 29, 1994, as Docwncnt No. 2S70026. (Over Outlot B, BAYVIEW FARMS 2ND ADDITION) Accc:ss 10 the subject property is limited over public cascmc:ot in f2vor-oftheCityof0rono. Parcel subject to wctl.a.nds wh.ich may be subject to fcdcn.1, state. or local rcguLttion. Parcel subject 10 terms and conditions for-Driveway Eascmmt over OuOot 8, BAYVIEW FARMS 2ND ADDITION, in favor of Lot I, Block I, BAYVI EW FARMS 2ND ADDITION . (Shown on Ccnificate of Title) TWP.117 • RG E.23. SEC.06 HENNEPIN COUNTY BOOK XXX/PAGE XXX ORONO, MINNESOTA PRELIMINARY PLAT BAYSIDE MEADOWS FILE NO. 31202-070 pp pp RE!ITORATION NOTES RESTORATION • 2 .5 ACRES A RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH 4" TO 6" Of TOPSOIL. OR EXISTING ON-SITE ORGANIC MTRL B : SEED PONO SLOPES ANO DETENTION AREAS WITH MN/DOT 310 OR BWSR P8 SEED M IX AT A RATE OF 100 LBS./ACRE ANO FERTILIZE WITH =10 AT 100 LBSJACRE. C SEED ALL OTHER DISTURBED AREAS WITH MNOOT 250 ANO BWSR SEED MIX FOR WETLANDS AT A RATE Of 100 LBSJACRE ANO FERTILIZE WITH 20-0-10 AT 100 LBSJ ACRE. (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) o ONLY PHOSPHOROUS FREE FERTILIZER IS TO BE USED ON SITE. E : MULCH WITH TYPE 1 AT A RATE Of 2 TONS/ACRE ANO DISC ANCHOR IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLACEMEITT. USE WOOOFIBER BLANKET ON ALL SLOPES 3 :1 (FT) OR GREATER. F MAINTAIN All SILT FENCE UNTIL TURF HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. G. RESTORATION WORK WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN 72 HOURS Of GRADING COMPLETION. 10. SILT FENCE, BEFORE GRADING · 1,110 LF S EPTIC FIELD PROTECTION · ee6 LF AFTER GRADING· 525 LF (pond) 11 . TREE FENCE. BEFORE GRADING · 250 LF 12. WOOOFIBER BLANKET · 1, 50 S'f I I I I I I I I I I I I ?'!i!!;~D~ NURP PON O W\LL BE Ulk.lZEO TO MEET OR EXCE ED QUALITY AND RAlE CON'lROL REQUIREMENTS. i SKIMMERS. 'THE POND OUTlET STRUCT\JRE lNCLUOES A SUBMERGED tNl.ET PIPE TOAUOWSKIMMING. 3. RIP RAP • RIP RAP WILL BE UT IL IZ ED AT ALL APRONS FOR ENERGY 04SSIPATION ANO PROVIDE SEOMENT CONTROL ... SLOPE STABIU ZATION -SLT FENCE WU BE INSTALLED ALONG DOWN GRA.DtENTGRADINGUMfTSN<tOWOCX)f,IBERBI..AHKET W,LL BE UTILIZED ON ALL SLOPES ~;1 OR GREATER TO PROVCE. A.OEOUAlE SLOPE STABLIZATION 6 . 8\0ROt.LS . BIOROI.LS WIU BE INSTALLED ALONG REAR YARD SWALES TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM REACHING TI-IE NURP e iNC::~~=~i:~~O:e!s~~~~ETENTION AREAS W,U BE UTIJZEOTOREOUCEiftET,..., THE RUNOFF FROM 'TME JNCREASEO HARDSUAFACE. 7 STREET SWEEPING. STREET SWEEPINO WIU BE DONE A MINIMUM Of ONCE PER WEEK OR MORE FREOUENT\.VTO MINIMIZE: OUST CONTROl AN O VEHla.E TRACKNG 10 PHOSPHOROUS FREE FERTILIZER • PttOSPHOROUS FREE FERTUZEA WU. Al.SO BE USED ON srTE.. OWNER: PETER & SHARON RENNEBOHM PID#-0611723210005 1 \ I ___ J OWNER; JAMES MORGAN & DEBRA PULFORD PID#-0611723220022 B ayside M eadow Project Notes: 1. The house typM and plooomen1 and proposed driveways are for illUllnltive purposes orly. A detailed -· of survey will be prepared for each lot, conforming to the the City setbedt requiremeru. 2. Tree Cleating wiU be roqulred for the road and stonnwater pond conmuction. Ther9 .-e trees~ In red, thal lllustroto trNS thal may be removed lo< 1he proposed house ard driveway oonstndion. Tho proposed houso p1aceme,. for L 1 &2 wiU be \Mthin the existing on-site tree cover. 3. Off-Si1e grading will be required for the private road construction, the necessary gradir1J eesemetU will be obtained once the projed has preliminary plat •wn,val. since~ maybe plan revioions. 4 . A monument 1, proposed and • monumert oasemerc will be obtained. 5 . St<ee1 • Runil Section -See Street Plan Sheet • Ott cl, typical section 3: 1 olope / 2' depCt, / 3' Wdh 50 25 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 1-_;;o!=E~Sl~G~NE!,!R~~..!NO~. +-'B~Y~_..::D:::.ATE!!:..+----...C.R=EVl=SIONS==------1 use (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION. ANO/OR CONVEYANCE Of RSM ------------~:;~~;~:1;~1 ~~~~:ss~~~~~~;~~EWITHOUT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT S UPERVISION ANO THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS Of THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DRAWN BY ------------SAID AUTHORIZATION CONS TITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE /\NO SHALL THEREBY RSM ------------INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST. INC. Of All RESPONSIBILITY. CHECKED BY _ _ _ _ _ ___ ----SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGmMATE """ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ USERORPARTYLEGAll.Y RESPONSIBLEFOROAMA GESORLOSSESRESULTING DATE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. 01-1!>-13 Robert S. Mo1st!".. PE Date: 0/ ljr::IJ] LI<:. No. J-LLa.., GENERAL NOTES; 0 00 OWNER: JAMES & JULIE DZUBA Y PID#-0611723220023 ,- 1 I 1~ .?'1 E .~ 1 • I I r _J -, I l ~ - OWNER: BRADLEY PASS ~· PID#-0611723240001 Oi -- I I .. r -- 1 I I I ---~ 1 ------11 --. ---.J ~ s: I i;; ~0 o~ Foo 0 00 ~c,00 o o <?_ OWNER : ERIN SULLIVAN PID#-061172322002 4 1. INSTALL SILT FEIIICE AS SHOWN ON PLAN, AS REQUIRED B Y THE CITY OF ORONO OR DIRECTED B Y THE ENGINEER. Ill Ill < Q. 2. THE WATER QUAUTY P ONO MUST BE EXCAVATED AT THE BEGINNING Of ~ING OPERATIONS TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY STORM WATER DETEITTION DURING CONSTRUCTION . SANO ANO SILT MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE PONO AS NECESSARY DURING CONSTRUCTION ANO AT THE COMPLETION Of THE PROJECT. 3. BEGIN GRADING, INSTALL PERFORATED RISER PIPE IN PONDS WHEN PONO GRADING IS COMPLETE. TEMPORARY DRAINAGE PIPE SHAll BE USED FOR IITTERMEOIATE DRAINAGE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD AS NECESSARY ANO DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER INSTAll SILT FENCE AROUND EXCAVATED PONDS. 4 . INSPECT POND. SILT FENCE, ANO ROCK EITTRANCE BERM AFTER ALL RAINFAll EVEITTS AS REOUIREO BY THE NPOES PERMIT. 5 . LINE ALL PONDS WITH A MINIMUM 3" ORGANIC SOILS & SEED SLOPES BETWEEN NWL ANO 100 YR HWL WITH A WATER TOLERAITT MIX. (OR AS NOTED) 6. REMOVE PERFORATED RISER PIPE WHEN STORM SEWER ANO OUTLET STRUCTURE FOR PONDS ARE INSTAI.LEO. 7 . PON0 -10:1 BENCH (1FOOT)THEN3:1 MAX 6 . THE GRADING CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR All STORM WATER INSPECTIONS ACCORDING TO THE MPCA STORM WATER PERMIT. THIS INCLUDES BOTH WEEKLY INSPECTIONS ANO INSPECTIONS DONE AFTER A 0 .5" RAIN EVEITT. A COPY Of THE INSPECTION REPORT MUST BE EMAILED TO THE ENGINEER ANO DEVELOPER ON A WEEKLY BASIS. Q. THE CONTRACTOR SHAll PLACE ANO MAINTAIN AN EFFECTIVE SILT CONTROL DEVICE. INLET PROTECTION SHAll BE REMOVED WHEN RESTORATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. 10. All RETAINING WALLS WILL REQUIRE A STRUCTURAL DESIGN, A BUILDING PERMIT & A FINAL INSPECTION REPORT. 11. A 1"·2" CRUSHED R OCK EITTRANCE BERM SHALL BE PLACED AT THE S ITE ENTRANCE, TO REPLACE SILT FENCE, ANO MINIMIZE EROSION ON TO THE STREETS. Tl1E R OCK BERMS SHALL BE THE WIDTH Of THE EITTRANCE ANO 2 FEET HIGH WITH 4 : 1 SLOPES . 12. THE CONTRAcTOR SHALL MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM THE BUILDING PAO ANO STREET AREAS THROUGHOLIT CONSTRUCTION. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ATTEMPT TO PREVEITT SOIL MATERIALS FROM LEAVING THE SITE BY EROSION ANO VEHICLE WHEEL TRACKING. HE SHAll BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING OF STREET. BOULEVARD AND UTILITY FACILITIES THAT RECEIVE ANY ERODED OR TRACKED SOIL MATERIAL OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS OR MATERIAL 14. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMA TE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHAll DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY ANO ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ANO All DAMAGES ARISING OUT Of HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE ANO PRESERVE ANY ANO ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. t,t.'-S St,<t"°~~ ,+ ! %, i ., \ $ .... \\'~'ts .,~ SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA. MN. 55391 (952) 47- CITY PROJECT NO. ORONO, MINNESOTA PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN BAYSIDE MEADOWS FIi.ENO. 31202-070 \ PIIISTA•- 1'111 B.IV • 101t.lZ A.D.•.e.oo K •IO.OO I I ~-I I I I I I I I ..- 1 _.., ..--- V aeo.ooocrYC -------- EXISTING GROUND ;~ --I ~ --I- -1<00 - RSM _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ INFORMATION}OFTHIS PROOUCTISSTRICTLYPROHIBITEDWlTHOUT DRAWN B Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ S ATHRE-BERGQU IST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT RSM SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMAT E USE ANO SHALL THEREBY CHECKED BY -= = = = = = = = = = = = ~Ao;:~_FB~:~iJ~~;~~~~G~~;~!\, ~~~~~~:~1:y ILLEGITIM ATE JOO< _ -_ --_ ------USEROR PARTYLEGALLYRESPONSIBLEFORDAM AGESORLOSSESRESULTING DATE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. 01-15-13 - I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: Robert S. Mo:~jld, P E Date: 0( ltdD. Lie. No. H'-CL• ., .. LOW POIN'f B.IV • 171..M LOW POINf ITA • .. 111.19 PIIIITA•'T- 1'111 B.IV • fflM A.D.•1',a K•a.'19 I ~ 't I • 1 I I 1, :1r .~ I . I -- I 1---- 1 ---.-----... ---, -r--90 \i ..J --·--1 J._ ---•1 -~ ~B=~ / L -----""1: 90 ., ' a E.,,........... \411 . ..... • /\.. 'i / /,,,.....) < ~!;, ,.....1 \<";,-,.....I 1., v,.....,....." I v I I I I - 1.5" BITUMINOUS WEAR CO URSE -MN/DOT SPWEB240B (2360 SPECIFICATION) 3" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE -MN/DOT SPNWB230B (2360 SPECIFICAT ION) 8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE , MN/DOT 3138" GEO FABRIC, MN/DOT TYPE V, MIRAFI 500X , 80Z/SY NON-WOVEN APPROVEDSUBGRADE (fl ~ a. 110JIOOO'YC ----------------..- SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZA TA, MN. 55391 (952)476-6000 CITY PROJECT NO . ORONO, MINNESOTA D ESIGN DATA: S TREET SECTION: 1.5" SPWEB240B WEAR COURSE (MN DOT 2360) 2 .5" SPNWB230B BASE COURSE (MN DOT 2360) 8" C L 5 AGGREGATE B ASE (MN DOT 3138) SUBGRAOE FABRIC (8 OZ/SY, NON-WOVEN)(~reqoooo) (See Pavement Design IR-Value Destgn -HaugoGeotechnicaf 01 -1 0-13) fl"' (2° wide) CL 7 AGGREGATE S HOULDER CROSS SECTION, 3%CROWN 10' PAVEM ENT WlOTH 2' AGGREGATE SHOULDER 3:1 DITCH SLOPE 2· TYPICAL DITCH DEPTH 3' TYPICAL DITCH WIDTH INSTALL CULVERTS FOR EACH DRIVEWAY WITH HOME CONSTRUCITON 50 25 ~ 25 50 SCAILE IN FEET PRELIMINARY STREET PLAN BAY S IDE MEADOWS 100 I FILE NO. 31202-070 ST ST ENTRY MONUMENT SEE SHEET 2 PLANTING BED SEESHEET 3 ~ w w a:: u (/) a:: w t-z <{ a.. I I I •, . ., I I ' 1', I ' I ' I ' / \ ,_ -1-- 1 I I I ' J I / I / I // ,_/ .,,.-------OC-o, / ' / \ \ / \ ' \ I + ~ t' ~ • 1' / .; , ' rt I -~ ! I ~"---1 I "cl! I L! \ ~ ~ ,'-J tf I: ; j I t58 I L~, 1 ..., I~ I f -'- l I I{+ ; I I l w~ I p I I J $~--L -""\. __ I __ J - ~&~ i o;ig ' :; I ."' ~ Ji, I I , ~z9 I 5 a. / Q; // / / / ~ T I \ ,, -l -\- 1 I I I I ' ', \ ' \\ ' ~ __/ OWNER: / @ PETER & SHARON RE NNEBOHM PID#-061172321 00~ > \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I I I / / / I I .., I ~ lo S: OJt => eo \ \ '\ \ ' OWN ER • JAME S MORGAN & D}BRA PULFORD PID#-061 172!5220022 \ 50 25 0 25 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 __ .., 0 / / OWN ER: / / I ( \ \ / .... .... ' \~ AM ERIC AN HOME MORTGAGE PID#-0611 723220021 \ 1 J 'I I I~ 18 f' \ ' -.... ~ ' OWN ER: j 0 " -.}_ JAMES & JU LI E DZU BA Y PID#-061 t723220023 -x,:o - I ~ -' --~- J-~O=::E~='G~NE~R,__+.:.:NO~. t--!B:.:Y-t--=DAc.:;TEc=...+-_-_-_-_-_-_-'-~=--:.::s_:.::ION;;.;_c::.s ------.---, ~!~sc~=~~:,IC~~~~~~E~~~~~~TION) LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS. INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUniORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONS TrT\/TES AN ILLEGmMATE USE ANO SHALL THEREBY INOEMNlFY NORBY & ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. NORBY & ASSOCIATES LANOSCAPE ARCHITECTS. INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOt.D Al<'f ILLEG ITIMA TE USER DR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. Norby & Associates Landscape Architects, Inc. ORAWN BY TOW CHECKED BY TDW DATE 01-23-13 :.,'nrtql,.~ .... ~"">f...cli)) -1'\Ml-aM ,..W~ th11 fJ.~~-""""-- e,,...: __ ,, ... _, _ IIW.-,Mbrr._., __ 100 EsS1 Second Slffl:I Chaw, MN 55318 (952))61-0644 m OWNE R: --- ~ BRADLE Y PASS ~ PID#-06 11723240001 ------ / ' ' --.!C!.._ t. \ ..., I ~ --r------000,_ ~, (99<.0 / ', ..:.....::...._ \ _.,'_\.._ \ -----0 -------...... \ S ' , I : I Ga oQO O Oµ -------<>66-----....... OWNER : ',, ERIN SULLIVAN ' PID ll-06117232 20024 ', ' PLANTING LEGEND -- ---- / --- (/) (/) <( a. /- / K E Y jCOMM O N NAME BOTANICAL NAME QUANTlnjSIZE NOT ES AL BH H L R M S M CITY PROJECT NO. ORONO, MINNESOTA Acer saccharum 6 PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN BAYSIDE MEADOWS I I FILE NO. 31202-070 1 3 ( / \ ~ ~ ~ / \ \ \ --- ,--- 1 ------ 1 ...L ... '--' . -------Precast Concrete Cap Stone Veneer """~-----Precast Concrete w/ sandblasted letters Precast Concrete StoneVe.-r Entry Monument Concept Scale: ~"=1'-0" ., --==~~l~!;!!NE~R!__..µ~µe!!.v+_1:D~ATE.!.;._+ ___ __:R,!!:EVIS=IDNS=,..._ ___ -j USE (INCLUDING COPYING. otSTRIBUTION . ANO/OR CONVEYANCE Of INFORMATION) I-NO. OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRK:T\.Y PROHIBITED WITHOUT NORBY & ASSOCIATES TDW -------------· ---LANOSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION . USE DRAWN BY -·-------------·---WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE ANO SHALL TDW THEREBY INDEMNIFY NORBY & ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC. Of ALL CHECKED BY ______ -----------~~~i'o~ 1~'e5t~~:5us~~:;i~~~~S~~~fii_~VES ~ -= :::. ..:: :::. ::.: :::. :::. :::. :::. ::: = =: :::. :::. :::. = FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RE SUL TING FROM ILLEGITMA TE USE. 01-23-13 ..L.I .I.. ..... ..L ~ i. .LJ i....J X 1024.64 I I -- RETAINING WALL TOW: (1023.0) BOW: (1020.0 ) -- >..--'-1 ) I -- \ Entry Monument Site Plan 1 0 5 --..Y..W•---- o-:~ ~ .. ---l2!!!.....- Norby & Associates Landscape Architects, Inc. IOOE>stSccundSucet °'""'""MN SS318 (9S2)361-0644 CITY PROJECT NO. ORONO, MINNESOTA X 1018.96 5 10 20 SCALE IN FEET NORTH / \ \ PRE LIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN BAYS IDE MEADOWS FILE NO. 31202-070 2 3 . .A....-1' r'. ( 3,REDMAPLE (SEE SITE PLANTING PLAN) DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MU LC H 4" DEPTH 3 FIELDSTONE BOULDER < EB CUL-DE-SAC PLANTING PLAN SCALE 1"=10'-0" 10 10 20 SCALE IN FEET NOlrTH l..-_!!:OE:;~~IG;!!:NE!=R~-+~NO~. µB::_Y+...::D::::A.:..:TE=---jc-----'-R.:::EVlc:.=SION-""'S'------1 ~~;::~S~=~;~K:~~=~~~~g~~TION) ---------------~---LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC.'s EXPRESS WRJTTEN AUTHORlZATION. USE DRAWN BY row CHECKED BY TOW DATE 01-2~1 3 WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZAT ION CONSTITUTES AN 11.LEGmMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY NORBY & ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCH ITECTS. INC. OF All RESPONSIBILITY. NORBY & ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS. INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD 1'HV ILLEGm MATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM 11.LEGITMATE USE. ([) ENTRY PLANTING PLAN 3 SC ALE 1"=10'.0" ,.._._,._ ~1*"'r~ ., 10 r I 10 SCALE IN FEET .LJ ..J... .1. .... ~ i...L.J ..L...I X 1024.64 20 NOlrTH .ENTRY PLANTING LEGEND COMMON NAM E BOTANICAL NAME QUANTn PERENNIALS "'•-n Jo\l Sedum S«lum • 'Autumn Joy· Gcldslurm R udbeclda Rutbeckla 'Goldsturm' Kar1 Foersw Grass C.emeprmtis x s;utffkn 'K•rl Foemtef -SaMa Salvia nemerosa 'Mainac;ht' Moor&tine Ytm>N Achilea'Moonshile ' RlbY Stsla Daylt, Hemerocatls 'Rubv Stella' Russians-Pervosl<ia spp. NOTE: ALL TREE PLANTINGS ARE FO UND ON SHEET 1 (PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN) CITY PROJECT NO. 16 10 7 14 16 11 1 ----14-MAYNIGHT SAi.ViA _.-- 1~TURM1fliDBECKlA 11 -RUBY_STELbA DAY LIL Y 16-AJJIUMN JO YSEDUM 16-MOONSHINE YARROW 1-RUSSIAN SAG E /~VINYL ED~ING ~ / B OULDE R WALL ---------DO UBLE SHREDDED Sl2E 1 aal 1 aal 1 aal 1 aal 1 gal 1 aal f ,iii NOTES HARDWOOD BARK MULC H 4"DE PTH 7-KARL FOERSTER GRASS Plant 18" O.C . Plant 18" o.c. Plant 30" O.C . Plant 18" O.C . Plant 18" o.c. Plant 18" o.c. Plant 36" o.c. J ---- N orb y & Associat es Landscape Architect s, Inc . PRELI MINARY PLANTING PLAN 100 EsS1 Scwnd St=t Chaska, MN 553 18 (952)361--0644 ORONO, MINNESOTA BAYSIDE MEADOWS )< FILE NO. 31202-070 3 3 1-.....!:0~E~~!!:l~~N~ER~-j....!:~+-!'..BY:_f--'~:::A;.:TE.:::._-t-_-_-----..:.:_::EV=:_:::IONS::.:_.:::..-_--_-_--I ~~~~~:~c:,;~;1~1~~6~:~c~~=~~~ SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'a EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT s~o AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN IU£GITIMATE USE ANO SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY IU£GffiMA"lc USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM llLEGITMATE USE. DRAWN BY RSM CHECKED B Y OA"Tc 01-15-13 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS Pl.AN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANO THAT I AM A DU LY REGIS"TcREO PROFESS IONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Rober1 S. MolstJl(I, P E. Date: ot/ldJl. Lio. No. J.+':O..t SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. S5391 (1152) ~7~000 C ITY PROJECT NO . ORONO, M INNESOTA 1" = 70' 250' AERIAL SITE PLAN BAYSIDE MEADOWS F Ii.ENO. 3 1202-070 AE AE RECEIVED .,,. JAN 2 3 2013 CITY OF ORONO K]OLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY Prol!idi"I Sound, Balanud, Comprthtnsiw Natural Ruouru Solutions Memorandum Date: January 22, 2013 To: Bob Molstad, Sathre-Berquist From: Melissa Barrett, Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company Re: Natural Resources Inventory-Bayside Meadows (Wachman Parcel), Orono, MN The-13.75-acre Wachman Parcel is located in Section 6, Township 117N, Range 23W, City of Orono, Hennep in County, Minnesota, south of Bayside Road, and south of the addresses of 4665 and 4645 Bayside Road (Figure 1). On January 3, 2013 KES visited the Wachman Parcel to complete a tree survey and document other natural resources information for use in preparing the Conservation Master Plan. Kjolhaug Environmental Services (KES) has completed a number of environmental related items to be used in future planning. Items completed included (l) a basic Natural Resources Inventory as outlined in Section 78-1634(4) of the Orono City Code, (2) an invasive species and diseased tree removal plan, and (3) mapping and review of Orono E cological Management Categories. Previously in 2012, KES completed a wetland delineation on the site (Figure 2) which was subsequently reviewed by Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The Notice of Application (comment period) for the wetland delineation review ends on January 22, 2013 (Appendix A). After that time a Notice of Decision approving the wetland boundary can be issued by the watershed district. Natural Resources Inventory City of Orono Natural Resources Inventory -The 2006 City or Orono Natural Resources Inventory prepared by Hennepin Conservation District was reviewed. Land Cover Classification Level l and Level 3 assessments showed artificial surfaces, planted or cultivated vegetation, forest, and shrubland within site boundaries . No areas identified by the Minnesota Biological Survey were shown within site boundaries. A natural area comprised of oak forest (mesic subtype) was identified in the southeast comer of the site. This same area of the site was identified by the Conceptual Greenway Corridor Alignment as containing: l) the potential for a 261 05 w;1d Rose La,e, Sho,ewood, M;""esota 55331 , Phom,, 952-401 -8757, Fa" 952-401jBJ91l'1 [: g ·1.l ~J ~) // high quality natural community, 2) a conceptual greenway corridor, 3) steep sloping soils, and 4) other natural and semi-natural communities. High and medium quality natural community remnants also have the potential to support rare species. The inventory did not identify any specific need for proactive management or protection for the site. The wetland present on the site is not of type or quality to qualify for proactive management or protection. However, Wetland 1 will benefit from the implementation of a wetland buffer and storm water protection. Due to field observed encroachment/invasion of invasive species within the southeast forested area, the presence of rare species is unlikely. Figures for all items listed above can be found in Appendix B. For reference, the full Orono Natural Resources Inventory document is available online at: http://www.hennepin.us/portal/site/Hennepin US/menuitem .b 1ab754 717 50e40fa0 l dfb4 7 ccf0649 8/?vgnextoid=6 l b2b556b89332 l OV gn VCMl 0000049 l 14689RCRD Review and Revision of DNR MLCCS Data -Current DNR Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) inventory data for the site was downloaded and reviewed for accuracy (Figure 3). A revised MLCCS map incorporating KES field observations is provided in Figure 4. Attached Table 1 outlines in detail DNR data and KES field verified data. Modifier M_34X has been included, as has the modifier for common buckthom (M-408). Little to no garlic mustard was observed on the site. Data sets are similar in that they both identify hayfield, grassland, and forest. KES was able to modify specific land cover boundaries based on known wetland boundaries and field verified land cover. The most drastic land cover change would be the reclassification of the southeast comer from an oak forest mesic subtype to a maple basswood forest. KES field verified data also provides more accurate information regarding invasive species coverage and location. Based on our assessment, proposed development of the site will not result in any negative impact to ecological communities (i.e. no modification to a lower level of ecological community quality as described by the MLCCS M-34X modifier; City Code Sec. 78-1635(6)). The home lots that will be located near or within the southeast maple basswood forest will likely be located close to the roadway where the highest concentration of common buckthorn and diseased trees were observed. Tree Survey -Tree ID number, diameter breast height (DBH), and species name for trees tagged during the tree survey are provided in Appendix C. Generally, trees were located within areas identified as altered forest, conifers, and maple basswood forest on Figure 4; however, some scattered trees were located in the hayfield. Four significant tree stands (STS) are located on the site and are labeled as shown in Figure 5. These tree stands correspond to areas identified as altered forest, conifers, and maple basswood forest on the 2012 MLCCS land cover inventory. Wetland Inventory and Wetland Buffers -A wetland delineation was completed on the site in 2012 by KES. The report identified one wetland (Wetland l) within site boundaries (Figure 2). Originally, Wetland 1 on the site was given a protection classification of Preserve by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) inventory. In January 2013 KES completed a MNRAM functional analysis for Wetland 1. Based on the analysis results, a revised protection classification of Manage 2 was determined. MCWD approved the management classification change on January 17, 2013 (Appendix D). Minnehaha Creek Water District (MCWD) revised their Wetland Protection Rule in September 2010. Similar to City of Orono rules, buffers widths are based on the management class of the wetland as determined by a functional analysis . However, MCWD base buffer widths are generally wider than City designated widths. The more restrictive of the widths must be represented on the grading plan. Wetland Buffer Protection, Augmentation, and Enhancement -Existing wetland buffers on the site have a continuous dense layer of perennial grasses that have been unbroken for at least 10 consecutive years. Buffer adjacent to Wetland 1 will not be disturbed by construction activities; therefore, no buffer augmentation or enhancement is needed . Ecological Management Category Review -The site was assessed for City of Orono Ecological Management Category (EMC) ratings (City Code Sec. 78-1635(9)(4)), and Figure 6 illustrates observed category areas. Level 1 EMC areas are associated with wetlands and their buffers. Level 3 EMC areas are suitable for stormwater management. No Level 2 EMC areas (ecological opportunity areas) were observed on the site. Invasive Species and Diseased Tree Removal Plan Invasive Species Removal and Management Plan -Areas with invasive species observed on the site are illustrated in Figure 7. The primary invasive species identified on the site was common buckthom. A detailed common buckthorn management plan is included in Appendix E. Trace amounts of other non-native, invasive species were observed ( common mullein, motherwort, garlic mustard). Future seeding of invasive species management areas (outside of the graded home lots) is not anticipated because cut stump treatment and foliar spraying of buckthorn and other trace invasive species should not result in bare soil or un-vegetated areas. As invasive species comprise less and less cover over time , native species are 'released'. Native species that have been dormant under the canopy of invasives are expected to naturally come back on their own. Although not precisely measured, buckthom trees observed on the site represented approximately 99% of the total invasive cover. Buckthom shrubs less than 1.5 inches in diameter will likely be foliar treated. Buckthom trees greater than 1.5 inches in diameter should be stump cut, and their trunks and branches should be chipped or hauled off the site. Diseased and Dying Tree Removal Plan -Tree ID number, diameter breast height (DBH), and species and for all trees tagged during the field tree survey are induced in Appendix C. Diseased or dying trees identified for removal (49 in total) are primarily located in the diseased tree area shown on Figure 7 . However, some dead white pine trees were also present in the conifer areas . Diseased/dead trees identified for removal are hazard trees in poor to dead/dying condition and are in locations that would endanger property and/or other trees. Due to their exiting low quality, mitigation for these trees is not proposed. Mitigation for any snags removed from within the building area would not require mitigation as snags are dead trees . However, snags outside of the building area do not pose a hazard and can provide valuable wildlife habitat to a wide variety of birds and mammals and should left in place. Many of the larger sugar maples in the very southeast portion of the site have numerous cavities, and barred owl feathers were observed . These trees should be left in place unless they pose a hazard to the building sites. Tree Protection and Mitigation Plan -The exact trees that will be removed due to home construction is unknown at this time. Therefore a mitigation plan for impacts to healthy trees has not been provided with this memo. When assessing tree impacts in the future, boxelder trees should be considered to be an invasive native species and therefore should not require mitigation . TABLE 1-MLCCS Existing and Revised-Wachman Parcel 2005 DNR MLCCS Inventory Data MLCCS Alphanumeric Code MLCCS Definition Code 24217 2.ch.GN.pUS.cHF Hayfield 52130 5.de.UP.nA T Altered/non-native dominated upland shrubland 32112 3.de.UP.nOA.nOM Oak forest mesic subtype 62140 6.gt.GD.Nat Grassland with sparse deciduous trees -altered/non- native dominated vegetation 42130 4.de.UP.nAT Altered/non-native dominated deciduous woodland 32150 3.de.UP.nMB Maple-basswood forest (northeast part property) 32150 3.de.UP.nMB Maple-basswood forest (south property line) 13124 l .hh.CT.i25.cGS Short grasses and mixed trees with 11-15% impervious cover 13134 l .hh.CT.i50.cGS Short grasses and mixed trees with 26-50% impervious cover 2012 K. lh ,JO aug E . nv1ronmen tat N atura IR I t Ob esource nven ory f serva tons MLCCS MLCCS Definition Code Alphanumeric Code 24217 2.ch.GN.oUS.cHF Hayfield 32150 3.de.UP.nMB Maple Basswood Forest 62140 6.gt.GD.nA T Grassland with sparse deciduous trees -altered/non- native dominated vegetation 61420 6.ge. WB.n WM Wet Meadow Wetland 32170 3.de.UP.nA T. Altered/non-native deciduous forest 21300 2.tt.CM. Planted, maintained or cultivated mixed coniferous and deciduous trees Modifier Definition M_34X Quality ofnatural community ( see table on following page for values definition) M_2XX Cultural land use (values are 210 to 276) M 408 Common buckthom (* see table on following page for values definition) Modifier Modifier M_34X M 2:XX blank 276 blank B blank blank C D blank blank Modifier Modifier M 34X M 2:XX NN 276 B NN NA D NA Modifier Approximate M_408 acres on-site 7.98 3 1.96 2 2.34 0.08 0.15 3 0.11 6 0.30 0.35 0.48 Total = 13 .75 Modifier Approximate M_408 acres on-site 2 8.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 0.5 5 0.15 0.6 Total= 13 .75 Continued on next page TABLE 1 (continued) M_34X Natural Plant Quality Modifier Values Cover Class/Estimated Percent Cover for Invasive Species Modifiers Cover ClassNalue Definition A Highest quality natural community , no disturbances and natural processes intact. Good quality natural community. Has its natural B processes intact, but shows signs of past human impacts . Low level s of exotics. Moderate condition natural community with obvious past C disturbance but is still clearly recognizable as a native community. Poor condition of a natural community. Includes some D natives, but is dominated by non-natives and/or is widely disturbed and altered. NA Native species present in an altered / non-native plant community. Altered I non-native plant community. These semi- NN natural communities do not qualify for natural quality ranking. M_ 408 Common Buckthorn Cover Modifier Values Cover Class/Estimated Percent Cover for Invasive Species Modifiers Cover ClassNalue Definition 0 Unknown or not observed I Observed , unknown quantity 2 I -5% Cover 3 6-25 % Cover 4 26 -50% Cover 5 51 -75% Cover 6 76-100% Cover Note: Site boundaries on this figu r e are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. '2i L ':.: '-. ~ Wat ertown Rd ~ z 6th Ave N z C. Lake\ _§ I, 'o,;s, p.\Je t-l Wayzat a Slvd w O ro n 0 j 'ld r ch Lake --- l ~nwoou Blv d 19 j 4-~ ~e,4, Ji ~ IJ ~ ~ljeRd -84 j Site Location ~ ci 'y, ~ 0 ..r::. V, z ~J A nn {)r 19 110 J Saga Hill Jenn~ngs Bay /\/ s;,o ""ie>Dr "C ;;. a!! ., ~ "' E f 0 u s Stubbs Bay .... 0 ::I " .. i "'d 1i "<= ~ ~ Not1. ~ Arm r 51 oy IJXW(!/1 Day Wa:e,u ..... n Rd fu:. St ~<.,horf'Or Lo ng la Frentfl l ate' 146] ..... 'O 1%'. C ~ e co ..... ~ C ... 6 ~ '>~ Cry sta l Bay 15 Min n etonka Be ach t)irm9Jl M ound Spri n g Park ~ Sho reli ne Dr ~ ., R ~" © 20 12 l.licro;oft Corporation© 201 2 Nofu Figure 1 -Site Location Map ~ fvOUIAUG ENVIRON MENTAL SERVICES COMPANY ------- Wachman Parcel (KES No. 2012-068) Orono, Minnesota +N No Scale f _,, OU IONOUA.: lClfailQ:":ft.19 lill,I LOT~l.OAC Mll'l l OfV4>nt:l'OO n' rvs&-S<l rT ST'S11•30FT SY5I S11tT-60,,. Fl"Sa-50" •• MAX ~LfNOTH -IOOOn •• 0 M1N Ct.JINl!'.2JSn Pftf:PAAEC>roR: --· CON'T'~T:TYLCll:VICNCUS ,, . ..,,..., 1!1Q8flNGUf1.ml':S !II-Olo'NMl:SHC!Wtf1,j AH ~J,U,.Tl!WAY ()t(.V, M c.oN11VCTOIII MW.LCE'Tf""*I: lHE EX.ACT LOCATION OF N« N#O AI..L !XSS""'3 UTILITIES IEFOR£COM,IEHC.a«)W()Rk. Nl AORa:S l08En.l.LYRESPON5111t.l" rOft W'f ~AU. ONMGU........, OUT 0, "IS ,III.U'II: TOOM:TI.Y LOCAff M«l l"ftDVM! Mt( Nf.>MJ. E)OSJN)Ufll.lTIE&. I HEAU YCUl:TJFY TK,\T l'..s fl'I.M Oill:5".CIF1CII.TlOMWM ll'MO'ARE> 1Y • ORI.A«IER MY OIAC-.CT StMINISION NIO fhA T I AM 1, tu. Y Rl:OISTDE) l"ROFUSIOtW. £HGN:t'JI l.N:ll"R THE LAWS CF fl'E SIAIE OF,....,SO'L\. -----""""' --- c.. <( ::; z I"' .:.. <f 0 ..J 0 z < ..J ,.. UJ ~ REVIS IONS c .. q Z ; ~-~ ~i :::, z 0 2. (!) ~ 0::: ~ W 3: CD ~ I 3: w ~ 0::: ~ I '° I-io <( ~ UH ..J UJ ~ 0 0 0:: Cl) <{ UJ CL z z z :E <{ ~ ci :r: z (..) 0 <{ Q'. s: 0 '''""' -Ct4ECl'..EC> "" _., Wet BY Cl) UJ ::; 0 J: <( UJ ~ 0 C, Notes: See text for MLCCS (lulc_mlccspy3) description. All boundaries on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Figure 3 -2005 DNR MLCCS Map (DNR Data Deli) &2010 Aerial Photograph ~ lyOLHAUG ENVIRON M ENTAL SERVIC ES C OMPANY ---- Wachman Parcel Orono (KES No. 2012-068) Orono, Minnesota ,tN 1 inch -207 fe et Notes: See text for MLCCS description. All boundaries on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Legend C=:J Site Boundary Altered Forest Conifers L Grassland l-Hayfield · . ' • Maple Basswood Forest ~Wetland Figure 4 -Revised MLCCS Map per KES Natural Resource Inventory (2010 Aerial Photograph) ~ FjOUIAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY ---.,. Wachman Parcel Orono (KES No. 2012-068) Orono, Minnesota 1 inch-207 fee t Notes: All boundaries on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Figure 5 -Significant Tree Stands (STS) (2010 Aerial Photograph) ~ K!OLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY -- Wachman Parcel Orono (KES No. 2012-068) Orono, Minnesota -t-N 1 inch -207 feet ........__ Notes: See text for EMC categories and description. All boundaries on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. (=:J Site Boundary ~ Level 3 EMC_Orono ' C Figure 6-Ecological Management Categories (EMC) (2010 Aerial Photograph) ~ lyOUfAUG ENVJRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY Wachman Parcel Orono (KES No. 2012-068) Orono, Minnesota +N 1 inch -207 feet Notes: All boundaries on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. J Diseased Trees [:=J Site Boundary Figure 7 -Invasive Species Management & Diseased Tree Removal Area (2010 Aerial Photograph) ~ }ifOUIAUG E NVIRONMENTAL S ERVICES C OMPANY ....._.__ Wachman Parcel Orono (KES No . 2012-068) Orono, Minnesota ,tN 1 inch -207 feet APPENDIX A Bayside Meadows, Orono, MN Minnesota Wetland ConsetVation Act Notice of Application Local Government Unit (LGU) Address Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 18202 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Project Name Date of Bill Coffman Wachman Parcel Application 10/22/12 (completed 12/5/12) Application Number Wll-52 [gJ Wetland Boundary or Type 0No-Loss D Exemption D Banking Plan 0 Sequencing 0 Replacement Plan Bill Coffman has applied for wetland boundary & type approval for the parcel located approximately 400 feet south of Bayside Road and south of 4665 & 4645 Bayside Road (PIO #0611723220018). The application was received on October 22, 2012 and completed on December 5, 2012. The delineation was perfonned by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (KES) on October 12, 2012. The boundary was reviewed in the field on November 21, 2012 by MCWD staff. 2. APPLICATION REVIEW AND DECISION Signing and mailing of this completed fonn to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 3 provides notice that an application was made to the LOU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. A copy of the application is attached. Comments can be submitted to: Name and Title ofLGU Contact Person Comments must be received by (minimum 15 Catherine Bach business-day comment period): District Technician January 22, 2012 (4:30 PM) Address (if different than LOU) Date, time, and location of decision: 18202 Minnetonka Blvd A decision will be made following completion of Deephaven, MN 5S391 the comment period. Phone Number and E-mail Address Decision-maker for this application: (952) 641-4504 [gj Staff cbach@minnehahacreek.org 0 Governing Board or Council Signature:-~~· ~............__,~---Date: ~u/1v BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 1 of 2 3. LIST OF ADDRESSEES [81 SWCD TEP member: Stacey Lijewski -stacey.lijewski@co.hennepin.mn.us ~ BWSR TEP member: Lynda Peterson -lynda.peterson@state.mn.us D LGU TEP member (if different than LGU Contact): D DNR TEP member: [81 DNR Regional Office (if different than DNR TEP member): Melissa Doperalski - Melissa.Doperalski@state.mn.us D WD or WMO (if applicable): ~ Applicant (notice only) and Landowner (if different): Bill Coffman -billcoffman@cbburnet.com ~ Members of the public who requested notice (notice only): Consultant: KES (Melissa Barrett)-Melissa@kjolhaugenv.com City: Christine Mattson -cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us ~ Corps of Engineers Project Manager (notice only): Melissa Jenny-Melissa.m.jenny@usace.army.mil D BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator (wetland bank plan applications only) 4. MAILING INFORMATION }>Fora list of BWSR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn .us/contact/WCA areas .pdf }>Fora list ofDNR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/wca/DNR TEP contacts.pdf }>D eoartment o Natura esources f IR eg1ona ic es: R . I Offi NW Region: NE Region: Central Region: Southern Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Eco l. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. NE 1201 E. Hwy. 2 1200 Warner Road 261 Hwy. 15 South Bemidii, MN 56601 Grand Raoids, MN 55744 St. Paul, MN 55106 New Ulm, MN 56073 For a map ofDNR Administrative Regions, see: http://files.dnr.state.rnn.us/aboutdnr/dnr regions.pdf }>Fora list of Corps of Project Managers: www.mvp .usace.army.mil/regulatory/default.asp?pageid=687 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District, ATTN: OP-R 180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700 St. Paul, MN 55101-1678 }> For Wetland Bank Plan applications, also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 5. ATTACHMENTS In addition to the application, list any other attachments: D D D D D BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 2of2 APPENDIXB Bayside Meadows, Orono, MN Land Cover C lassificatio n -Level 1 Cit y o f O rono Lond Cover Clossification ond Natural Resources Inventory Lege nd c::::J City Boundary 40000 Woodland -50000 Shrubland La nd Cover Classification -Level ·1 60000 Hert>acous D No Land Cove r Classification data fer this area 70000 Nonvascu lar 10000 Artificial Surfaces and Assoeiated Areas -80000 Sparse Vegetatio n 20000 Planted or Cultivated Veget.xion • 90000 Water -30000 Forests City of Orono -Land Cover Classification and Natural Resource Inventory March 2006 0 2.250 4,500 9,000 Feet 1 inch equals 4.500 feet Figure 6 19 Land Cover C lassification· Level 3 Ci ty o f Orono Land Cover Classification and Natural Resou rces Inventory Legend c:] City Boonaary D 40000 Woodlanel 50000 Shrubland ·co1or Calegories for Le,,el 3 Land Cover Classification D 60000 Herbacous CJ 70000 Nonvascular D 10000 Artificial Surfaces ana Assooated Areas -80000 Sparse vegetation D 20000 Pl anted or CUitivated Vegetatio n -90000 Water -30000 Fcrests • Complete Leve l 3 Leg end on next page . City of Orono -Land Cover Classification and Natural Resource Inventory March 2006 0 2.250 4.500 9 .000 Feet 1 inch eq..ials 4 .500 feet Figure 7 20 Natural Areas and Communltly ID Numbers City of Orono La nd Cover Classification and Natural Resource s Inventory City of Orono -Ulnd CoYW Classiffcation and Natural Resource Inventory Matc/J 2006 23 Legend t::] City Boundary Natural Commumty Type -1 Tama rack swamp -2 Tam3rack swamp minerouophic subtype 3 Oak forest 4 Oak forest mesic subtype -5 Oak forest dry su btype -6 Map te -basswood fo re.\t 7 Aspen forest -8 Floodplain foreS! -9 Lowland har dwood fores1 -10 Black osll swa mp 11 Mixed h ardwood swamp -12 Aspen fo rest • saturated soils 13 Black 3sh swamp. seasonally flooded 14 Mixed hardwood s wamp· seasonalty flooded -15 Upland m1 •ed conife rous-deciduous forest -16 Oak woodland-brushland 17 NatN"e dominated tempo rarily flooded shrv bland -18 Poor fen shrub subtype 19 Roell fen shrub subtype 20 Shrub swamp seepage su btype 21 Birch bog, spiraea sh,ubbnd -saturated so ils -22 Alder swamp -23 Wet meadow shrub subtype -24 W•low sw~mp 25 Mesic pra1ne 26 Wet meadow -27 Poor fe n sedge subtype 28 R,ch fen 29 R,ch fen sedge subtyp e -30 Cattail marsh -seasona lly flooded -31 Mllced emergent marsh -seasonally flooded -32 Wet meadow • seasonally flooded -33 Cattail m 3rsh . semipermanenlty flooded 34 Mored emergent m;.,r,h -35 Wet me adow . sem,permanent ly flooded 36 Catta il marsh -1nterm(tenUy exposed -37 Ca ttail marsh • pe rmanent~ flooded -38 Water ily open marsh -39 Lrnnetic open wate r -40 Permanento/ flooded aquatic bed -41 Palustrme openwa let' 1,600 3.200 6 ,400 .... I inch eq>~'S 3.200 fe et Figure 8 Legend c:::J City Boundary t.:J steep Sl ope S0i1S -ONR Scientifi c and Natural Areas -Regional Par1<s Natural Community Quality conceptual Greenway Gorridor r:z2l High Quality _ A<ljacent Greenway Corridors Me<li um Quality other Natural and Semi-Natural conmunities --streams E:;;J Existi ng Wetlan<lS 100 Year FIOOdplain City of Orono -Land Cover Classification and N atural Resource Inventory March 2006 0 2.2 50 4.500 9.000 Feet 1 inch equals 4.500 feet Figure 9 23 County Biological Survey Sites City of Orono Land Cover Classification and Natural Resources Inventory • C8S B IOOiwrsty Ra "l~:il"lg lorOtt-r s ,n IC:lo;rs·.,,01N$ HlG-1 MCCERA~ 6ELO\V •~11N f.'UM OVE~iV &TA-.,OAROS Legend C.our:y Bro logic;I/SUl'\'t y tJar~ :::cm,,,u.,,!..s (=:J A!:=EN FORE.S- C A5:?EN WOOC,_A.,...,:) C S:.ACK ASn S,'.A'lir C: Ct..Ti ... lL MJl:..:.;:;.s - Ll ORV OW SAVII.N~Ji C];.=r,ow~. -EMERGEN Tt.•.r..P!-1 C] C'\.OOOF~AtJ :CREST -i'-~ .. \':00 $'.\"A.VP FOREST -.O,\'l_.D HAS.CWOOO FOR:ST -\\AP LE-:A~S ,\'000 FC~S.i 1510 \",COC$, -\.tESIC -iA=iCWCOO FORE S-SYSTE'A -\ESIC ~ SAVA~). i CE\fTR:.. .. } -'AESIC ='l>\RE -'A!XEO E.\1ErtGEf,fff,'ARS-l •FOREST, -MlXEO n.l.=iC',~,coo SW<lVP City of Orono -Land Cover Classification and Natural Resource Inventory March 2006 0 2,250 4,500 1 in ch equals 4,500 feet •o...••CRes· -OAK -.·:coo-ANC-ERU~:-LAHJ 1Ei1GW COOS ) -POCR FEN S.EOOE SUS-YPE 9,000 Feet -REO O,l,.K . S .. GAR ,.,..,,.PLe:-S.A.SS'\'\'OCO-rEIIE~t.J..,1--il:KOFIY: '="O;:;.EsT -RICH FEN 1'RASS TION) -RtcH F:N (T=l:A...,S TIOI.) S1-!RJ 3 SUBTYPE -SEOGE .-:.<:>~,•; -SEEPAGE ME.t.00\\' (SOUTHERN) -SHP.UE S"MJ,<P -S'LVEP.MAPL E -(V~G K.A CREi:=-E~!FlCO~LAl~~C~ST -S\VE~ MA.= .. e · GREEtJ ASH . COTT0!\',\000 T~RACE FOREST -SUGAR MA~.E FOREST (El ~ WO OOS) -TA.V.AAAC o< $WAJ.1..P -~'i":T l.l:ACOW -W ..LCW • :>00\VO O'.) $~V B SWS.Jl:;, ., .. .1.owsw. ..... ,, Figure 5 9 APPENDIXC Bayside Meadows, Orono, MN Tree ID Diameter Species Condition/Health Proposed for Requires (inches) Removal Mitigation 1 12 White pine 2 10 White pine 3 9 White pine 4 6 White pine 5 7 White pine 6 8 White pine 7 10 White pine 8 6 White pine 9 I I White pine 10 8 White pine dead " No 11 13 White pine 12 11 White pine 13 9 White pine 14 12 White pine 15 11 White pine 16 10 White pine 17 5 White pine dead " No 18 14 White pine 19 9 White pine 20 9 White pine 21 I I White pine 22 10 White oine 23 11 White pine 24 9 White pine 25 8 White pine 26 7 White oine 27 6 White pine dead " No 28 8 White pine dead " No 29 9 White pine 30 10 White pine 31 7 White pine 32 8 White pine 33 6 White pine 34 7 White pine 35 8 White pine 36 10 White pine 37 9 White pine 38 10 White pine 39 10 White pine 40 10 White pine 41 12 White pine 42 12 White pine 43 9 White pine 44 8 White pine Tree ID Diameter Species Condition/Health Proposed for Requires (inches) Removal Mitigation 45 8 White oine 46 3 Red cedar Guniper) 47 6 White pine dead '1 No 48 26 American elm dead, two trunks '1 No 49 10 White pine 50 11 White pine 51 9 White pine 52 10 White pine 53 11 White pine 54 4 White pine dead '1 No 55 11 White pine 56 9 White pine 57 11 White pine 58 10 White pine 59 11 White pine 60 12 Crabapple 3 to 4 main trunks 61 12 Red cedar Guniper) 62 6 Common buckthom multi trunks '1 No 63 15 Red cedar (juniper) multi trunks 64 9 Red cedar (juniper) multi trunks 65 11 White pine 66 10 White oine 67 IO White pine 68 11 White pine 69 5 White oine dead -..J No 70 11 White pine 71 14 Colorado blue spruce 72 7 Boxelder 73 8 Boxelder 74 28 Boxelder 75 15 Colorado blue spruce 76 18 Colorado blue soruce 77 11 Colorado blue spruce 78 16 Colorado blue spruce 79 8 Boxelder 80 9 Boxelder 81 17 American elm 82 14 Boxelder 83 16 Boxelder dead core '1 No 84 16 Boxelder damaged crown '1 No 85 18 Boxelder dead/core rot -..J No 86 12 White spruce 87 12 Colorado blue spruce 88 IO Colorado blue spruce Tree ID Diameter Species Condition/Health Proposed for Requires (inches) Removal Mitigation 89 11 White spruce 90 9 White spruce 91 9 White spruce 92 10 White spruce 93 20 Boxelder 94 see notes Crabapple multi trunks 95 15 American elm diseased -./ No 96 11 American elm 97 12 American elm diseased " No 98 8 American elm diseased/dying -./ No 99 9 American elm diseased/dying -./ No 100 12 Green ash 101 10 Sugar maple 102 12 Boxelder 103 7 Sugar maple diseased -./ No 104 10 unknown dead " No 105 6 Boxelder 106 7 Sugar maple 107 6 BE 108 6 Sugar maple broken crown 109 7 American elm 110 7 Sugar maple 111 7 Sugar maple 112 8 Sugar maple 113 10 American elm broken crown 114 7 Boxelder 115 12 Boxelder 116 8 American elm diseased '1 No 117 8 American elm diseased/dead " No 118 42 Bur oak 119 6 American elm 120 8 Green ash 121 14 American elm 122 9 American elm diseased -./ No 123 12 American elm 124 6 Ame rican elm diseased -./ No 125 II Green ash 126 16 American elm diseased " No 127 7 American elm diseased '1 No 128 12 American elm diseased/dead -./ No 129 7 Boxelder 130 6 American elm dead " No 131 8 American elm diseased '1 No 132 6 American elm dead '1 No Tree ID Diameter Species Condition/Health Proposed for Requires (inches) Removal Mitigation 133 9 American elm dead " No 134 10 American elm dead " No 135 14 Basswood 136 30 Sugar maple many dead limbs 137 7 American elm 138 8 Sugar maple 139 17 Green ash 140 8 Sugar maple 141 8 Sugar maple crown missing 142 11 Sugar maple 143 9 Boxelder 144 8 American elm 145 13 American elm 146 12 American elm 147 9 Boxelder 148 11 Sugar maple 149 11 American elm dead " No 150 26 Sugar maple core rot, no crown 151 28 Sugar maple core rot 152 12 American elm 153 15 Black walnut 154 24 Sugar maple core ro t/nearly dead " No 155 10 American elm dead " No 156 21 Sugar maple many dead limbs 157 7 Sugar maple 158 7 Sugar maple 159 8 American elm diseased " No 160 15 Green ash 161 23 Sugar maple snag 162 8 Sugar maple 163 8 Sugar maple 164 29 Sugar maple core rot/broken crown 165 7 Sugar maple 166 7 Sugar maple 167 9 Sugar maple 168 12 Sugar maple 169 6 Sugar maple broken crown 170 9 Sugar maple 171 7 American elm diseased '1 No 172 9 Sugar maple 173 8 Sugar maple 174 10 Sugar maple broken crown 175 9 Sugar maple 176 17 Hackberry Tree ID Diameter Species Condition/Health Proposed for Requires (inches) Removal Mitigation 177 13 Boxelder 178 16 Boxelder 179 16 Sugar maple 180 11 Sugar maple 181 8 Sugar maple 182 1 l Sugar maple 183 7 Sugar maple 184 IO Sugar maple 185 8 Sugar maple 186 6 Sugar maple 187 7 Sugar maple 188 IO Sugar maple 189 IO Sugar maple 190 7 Sugar maple 191 6 Sugar maple 192 16 American elm diseased/hollow " No 193 18 Sugar maple 194 8 Sugar maple 195 12 Sugar maple 196 6 Sugar maple broken crown 197 9 Sugar maple 198 8 Sugar maple 199 7 Sugar maple 200 8 Sugar maple 201 6 Sugar maple dead " No 202 9 Sugar maple 203 8 Sugar maple 204 7 Sugar maple 205 11 Sugar maple 206 10 American elm 207 7 Sugar maple 208 21 Basswood split core 209 6 Basswood 210 8 Basswood 2 l I 11 Basswood 212 8 American elm 213 17 Basswood 214 17 Basswood 215 10 American elm 216 8 Sugar maple 217 18 Red oak 218 7 Sugar maple 219 8 Sugar maple core rot/leaning " No 220 7 American elm Tree ID Diameter Species Condition/Health Proposed for Requires (inches) Removal Mitigation 221 10 Boxelder 222 16 Boxelder two trunks 223 7 Sugar maple 224 11 Sugar maple 225 9 Sugar maple 226 6 Sugar maple 227 IO Sugar maple 228 16 Green ash 229 14 Sugar maple dead/leaning -.J No 230 6 Sugar maple 231 6 Sugar maple 232 1 Green ash 233 8 Boxelder leaning 234 14 Boxelder 235 7 Boxelder 236 15 Hackberry 237 13 Basswood 238 6 Sugar maple 239 25 Sugar maole 240 12 Boxelder 241 10 Sugar maple 242 7 Sugar maple 243 8 Sugar maple 244 8 Sugar maple 245 26 Sugar maple 246 22 Sugar maple 247 7 Sugar maple 248 7 American elm 249 11 Boxelder 250 8 Sugar maple 251 6 Sugar maple 252 20 Green ash 253 7 Sugar maple 254 7 Sugar maple 255 8 Sugar maple 256 8 Sugar maple 257 9 Sugar maple crown missing 258 6 Hickory likely bitternut 259 21 Sugar maple 260 21 Sugar maple 261 8 Sugar maple 262 28 Sugar maple 263 27 Sugar maole 264 25 Sugar maple s pike Tree ID Diameter Species C ondition/Health Proposed for R equire s (inches) Remo val Mitigation 265 19 Sugar maple 266 24 Unknown possibly walnut, spike 267 26 Sugar maple 268 15 Sugar maple core rot 269 12 Sugar m aple 27 0 12 Sugar maple 271 14 Basswood 2 72 11 Bassw ood 2 73 8 Sugar maple 2 74 8 Sugar maple 27 5 19 Basswood 276 6 Su gar maple 277 7 Sugar maple 278 11 Sugar maple 279 25 S ugar maple extreme leaning -'1 No 280 7 Sugar mapl e 281 3 6 Sugar maple s nag, very nice 282 7 Suga r m aple 283 7 B asswo od 284 17 S ugar m aple many ho llow a reas 28 5 22 Sugar m aple botto m rot , o verall c ondi t ion o k 286 26 S uga r m ap le s pike 287 16 S ugar m aple snag 288 15 Basswood 2 89 14 Basswood 290 9 Bassw ood 29 1 16 Basswood 292 11 Bassw ood 293 10 Bassw ood 294 7 Bassw ood 295 9 Bassw ood 296 10 Basswood 297 l l Basswood 298 17 Basswood 299 10 Basswood 300 12 Basswood 301 16 Ba sswood 302 7 Bass wood 303 13 G reen a sh 304 14 Unknown d ead (onl y s uppo rted by tree 30 3) -'1 No 305 11 S ugar m aple 306 8 S ugar m aple 307 25 S ugar maple leaning, dy ing, core rot -'1 No 3 08 18 S ugar maple leaning, co re rot, manv dead branchei -'1 No Tree ID Diameter Species Condition/Health Proposed for Requires (inches) Removal Mitigation 309 15 Sugar maple 310 23 Sugar maple leaning, diseased, bad parts ..J No 311 11 American elm 312 6 Sugar maple 313 21 Sugar maple 314 10 Green ash 315 11 American elm 316 11 Basswood 317 11 Sugar maple 318 16 Sugar maple double trunks of equal diameter 319 19 Basswood 320 8 Basswood leaning but safe 321 9 Sugar maple bottom rot, overall condition ok 322 15 Boxelder big broken limb 323 22 Basswood 324 18 Basswood 325 11 Sugar maple 326 27 Sugar maple 327 28 Sugar maple snag 328 6 Sugar maple 329 13 Sugar maple 330 14 Sugar m ap le 331 13 Sugar maple 332 8 Sugar maple broken crown 333 14 Sugar maple bottom going bad 334 16 Boxelder 335 12 Boxelder 336 13 American elm 337 28 Sugar maple bad shape, hollow ..J No 338 13 Green ash 339 14 Green ash 340 6 Sugar maple 341 14 Boxelder 342 7 Sugar maple deformed 343 18 Boxelder leaning, split trunk 344 12 Boxelder 345 13 American elm 346 8 Boxelder 347 12 American elm 348 11 American elm 349 6 Sugar maple bad bottom 350 14 Sugar maple 35 1 11 Sugar maple 352 15 Sugar maple Tree ID Diameter Species Condition/Health Proposed for Requires (inches) Removal Mitigation 353 6 Sugar maple 354 7 Sugar maple broken crown 355 8 Sugar maple broken crown 356 20 Sugar maple bad shape, dying -..J No 357 10 Crabapple 358 8 Boxelder 359 10 Green ash 360 8 Crabapple 361 10 American elm 362 12 American elm dead -..J No 363 14 American elm dead -..J No 364 14 American elm dead -..J No 365 48 Sugar maple crown missing 366 12 Green ash 367 13 Green ash 368 10 American elm 369 7 American elm 370 60 Cottonwood see notes Black Willow multiple trunks 12 to 30 in , broken 371 main limbs see notes Black Willow multiple trunks 12 to 30 in, broken 372 main limbs 373 6 Boxelder 374 13 Green ash 375 34 Green ash multiple trunks, s plit crown APPENDIXD Bayside Meadows, Orono, MN MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT QUALITY OF WATER QUALITY OF LIFE Memo To: Melissa Barrett, Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company From: Catherine Bach, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District CC: Bob Molstad, Sathre-Berquist, Inc. Bill Coffman Date: January 17, 2013 Re: Wetland Functional Assessment (MnRAM) for PIO #0611723220018 (Wachman Parcel) An application for approval of wetland boundary & type under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act was submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (District) on October 22, 2012 for the Wachman parcel (PID #0611723220018), which is located just south of 4665 & 4645 Bayside Road in the city of Orono. One wetland was determined to be on the property and is shown on the attached survey. A wetland functional assessment using the current version of the Minnesota Routine Assessment Method (Mn RAM 3.4) was submitted on January 3, 2013 for approval. The functional assessment is contained in the attached memo. In the District's Functional Assessment of Wetlands inventory, the wetland is currently classified as Preserve. The wetland was classified as Manage 2 as a result of the functional assessment, and the District concurs with this classification. This memo serves as formal approval of the management classification of the wetland as Manage 2 for MCWD permitting requirements . Enclosed: Memo containing functional assessment Survey showing wetland boundary KjOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY Providi"l Sound, &lanud, ComJ,r<htnsive Natural Ruourct Soluliaru Memorandum Date: January 3, 2012 To: Catherine Bach, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Cc: Bob Molstad, Sathre-Berquist, Inc. From: Melissa Barrett, Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company Re: MNRAM Analysis -Wetland I, Wachman Parcel, Orono, MN According to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District wetland inventory, Wetland 1 of the Wachman Parcel is rated as a Preserve wetland. Wetland present on the Wachman Parcel is part of a larger PEMAd/PEMCd wetland complex that continues to the southeast and eventuall y connects (approximately 0.25 miles distance) to the North Arm of Lake Minnetonka shoreland system. Previously, wetland analyses performed for wetlands abutting shoreland have rated as Preserve due to the shoreline protection function. Howeve r , wetla nd present on the Wachman parcel does not provide shoreline protection. Wetland I was previously described as a Type 4 (PUBGx/PEMA) excavated, open water and fresh (wet) meadow wetland complex (Wachman Parcel Wetland Delineation Report dated Oc tober 22, 2012). At the time of the delineation, the PUBGx portion of the wetland was un- vegetated and dry. The center of the basin was an upland knoll dominated by a canopy of boxe lde r. For the purposes of the delineation it was included within the wetland boundary. Fresh (wet) meadow was dominated b y reed canary grass with lesser amounts of giant goldenrod and Canada thistle. Other non-dominant vegetation observed included: garlic mustard, asters , blue vervain , sedge, black willow, boxelde r, and American elm. In addition to the excavated basin, an excavated ditch connected the basin to the east property line. MNRAM Analysis A MNRAM version 3.4 functional analysis was completed for Wetland 1 on the Wachman Parcel to assess appropriate wetland functions and m a nagement class based on current, on-site observations. A MNRAM output summary and input d ata are included in Appendix A, and re s ults are summarized in Table 1 below . 26105 Wild Rose Lane, Shorewood, Minnesota 55331, Phone: 952-401-8757, Fax: 952-401-8798 T bl 1 MNRAM 3 4 A I . R I fi W I d 1 W h a e . na1vs1s esu ts or et an ac man P reel. a Function Rating Veg Diversity/Integrity Low Hydrology -Characteristic Moderate Flood Attenuation Moderate Water Quality-Downstream Moderate Water Quality-Wetland Moderate Shoreline Protection NIA Wildlife Habitat Structure Moderate Fish Habitat NIA Amphibian Habitat NIA Aesthetics/Recreational/ .... Low Stormwater Sensitivity Moderate Conclusion Based on current, site specific conditions the management classification for Wetland I of the Wachman Parcel is Manae:e 2 based on the highest rated function of Moderate for Wildlife Habitat. We are seeking concurrence with this management class determination from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District at this time . Thank you. APPENDIX A MNARAM Analysis-Wetland l , Wachman Parcel , Orono, MN Wetland Functional Assessment Summary Wetland Name Wachman Orono WL 1 Hy,lrogeomorphology Depressional/Flow-through (apparent inlet and outlet), Depressional/Flow-through (apparent inlet and outlet) Maintenance of Maintenance of A est/reties/ Characteristic Maintenance of Characteristic Recreation/ Wildlife Habitat Characteristic Amphibian Ed11cationl Maintenance of Hydrologic Regime 0.52 Moderate Flood/ Stormwater/ Atten11ation 0.38 Moderate Gro11nd- Water Maintenance Downstream of Wetland Water Q11ality 0.57 Moderate Water Shoreline Q11ality Protection 0.54 0.00 Moderate Not Applicable Additional Information Wetland Sensitivity Additional Stormwater Treatme111 to Stormwater Wetland Name Struct11re Fish Habitat Habitat C11lt11ral Commercial Uses Interaction Wetland R estoration Potential and Urban Development Needs Wachman Orono WL 1 0.42 0.00 0 .00 0.31 0.00 Combination 0.00 0.10 0.54 Discharge, Rech arge Moderate Not Applicable Not Applicable Low Not Applicable Not Applicable Moderate Moderate Wetland Community Summary Vegetative Diversity/Integrity Community Weighted Individual Highest Average Average Cowardin Circular Plant Wetland Community Wetland Wetland Wetland Wetland Name location Classification 39 Community Proportion Rating Rating Rating Rating Wachman Orono WL 1 27-117-23-06-001 PEM1A Type 1 Fresh (Wet) Meadow 70 0.1 0.10 0.10 0.10 Low Low Low PUBG Type4 Shallow, Open W ater 30 0.1 0.10 0.10 0.10 1Communilies Low I ~-100--,--------0-.1 -0 --+---o.-10--t---,-0 . ..,..10:-----i D Low Low 0 Denotes incomplete calculation data. Thursday, January 03, 2013 Page 1 of 1 MnRAM: Site Res po nse Reco rd For Wetlan d: Wach man O rono WL 1 Loca tion : 27-1 17-23-06-001 Wachman Si te O ro no Plant Commun ity: Fresh (Wet) Meadow Cowardin Classification: Ci rcular 39: PEM 1A Type 1 Pl ant Community: Shallow, Op e n Water C Cowardin Classification: PUBG 4 listed, rare. special species? 5 Rare community or habitat? Circular 39: Type4 6 Pre-European-settlement condition? Hydrogeomorphology I topography: 7 Depressional/F lowThru 8-1 Maximum water depth 8-2 % inundated 9 Immediate drainage--local WS JO Esimated si=el exisling site: I I-Upland Soil ! I-Wetland Soil 12 Outlet for flood control 13 O utlet for hydro regime 14 Dominant upland land use 15 Wetland soil condition 16 Vegetation ("/o cover) 17 Emerg. veg flood resistance 18 Sediment delivery 19 Upland soils (soil group) 20 Stormwater runoff 21 Subwatershed wetland density 22 Channels/sheet flow 23 Adjacent buffer width Adjacent area management 24-A Full 24-B Manicured 24-C Bare Oinches 0% 20 acres (see #66) ~ ~ 0 0 1 10% I ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 50 feet j 1100•;.j I o% I I o% I Adjacent area diversity/structure 25-A Native Io% I 25-B Mixed 1100%j 25-C Sparse I 0% I Adjacent area slope 26-A Gentle 26-8 Moderate 26-C Steep 2 7 Downstream sens.lWQ protect. 28 Nutrient loading 29 Shoreline wetland? Shoreline Wetland 3 O Rooted veg., % cover 31 Wetland in-water width 32 Emerg. veg. erosion resistance 33 Erosion potential of site 34 Upslope veg.l bank protection 35 Rare wildlife? 36 Scare!Rare!S J/S2 community 37 Vegetative cover 38 Veg. community interspersion 39 Wetland detritus 40 Interspersion 011 landscape 4 1 Wildlife barriers Amphibian-breeding potential 42 Hydroperiod adequacy I 43 Fish presence 4 ./ Ovenvintering habitat 45 Wildlife species (list) 46 Fish habitat quality 4 7 Fish species (Ust) 48 Unique/rare opportunity 49 Wetland visibility 50 Proximity to population 5 / Public ownership 52 Public access 53 Human influe nce on wetland 54 Human itifluence on viewshed 55 Spatial buffer 56 Recreational activity potential 0 0 ~ Io% I I 0 feet D D D ~ ~ [E ~ 0 0 Inadequate 0 ~ I NAI ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 5 7 Commercial crop--hydro impact I NA j Groundwater-specific questions 58 Wetland soils Recharge 59 Subwatershed land use Recharge 60 Wetland size/soil group Discharge 61 Wetland hydroperiod Recharge 62 lnlet!Ou1/et configuration Discharge 63 Upland topo relief Discharge Additional infor mation 64 Restoration potential No 65 LO affected by restoration 66 Existing size rn Restorab/e size Potential new wetland 67 Average width of pot. buffer o feet 68 Ease of potential restoration 69 Hydrologic alterations 0 70 Potential wetland type 0 71 Stormwater sensitivity B 72 Additional treatm en t needs A W a ter s hed W S# Service Area : For fun ctional rat ings, plea se run the Summary tab report . T his report printed on: 113120 13 Management Classification Report for Wachman Orono Wll ID: 29 Wachman Site Orono HENNEPIN County Watershed, # Corps Bank Service Area Based on the MnRAM data input from field and office review and using the cla ssification settings as shown below, this wetland is classified as Manage 2 Functional rank of this wetland based on MnRAM data Functional Category Self-defined classification value settings for this management level Low I Moderate Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Low Moderate Moderate Moderate Mod erate No t Applicable Moderate Vegetative Diversity/Integrity Habitat Structure (wildlife) Amphibian Habitat Fish Habitat Shoreline Protection Aesthetic/Cultural/Rec/Ed and Habitat Stormwater/Urban Sensitivity and Vegetative Diversity Wetland Water Quality and Vegetative Diversity Characteristic Hydrology and Vegetative Diversity Flo od/Stormwater Attenuation* Commericial use* Down stream Water Quality* The critical function that cau se d this wetland to rank as Manage 2 was Maintenance of Characteristic Wildlife Habitat Structure Detail s of the formula for this action are shown below : Moderate Moderate Low Moderate Low Moderate/ Low -/ - -I - -/ - Maintenance of Cha racteristic Wildlife Habitat Str (Q3e*2+Q39+Q37+Q38+Q40+Q41+(Q23+Q24+Q2 5)/3+Q13+Q20)/10 Ques tion Value Description 13 0.1 Outlet: hydrologic regime 20 0.5 Stormwater runoff 23 0.5 Buffer width 24 1 Adjacent area Management 25 0 .5 Adjacent area diversity 37 0 .1 Vegetation cover interspersion 38 0.1 Community interspersion 39 0.5 Detritus • The cl assi ficatio n value se ttings for these functions a re not adjust able Management Classification Report for Wachman Orono Wll ID : 29 3e 40 41 0.1 1 1 <No Description Found> Wetland interspersion/landscape Wildlife barriers This report was printed on : Thursday, January 03, 2013 • The classifica tion value settings for these functions are not adjustable Wachman Site Orono HENNEPIN County Watershed,# Corps Bank Service Area OOOIHW•(Zs:6) l6tS'S'NN'Vl.VZAVM AVMO'l'm!QHJ.OOSO!a ·8N1 '.1s 1nom:13s-3~H1vs S3~0H V3AN0£) VlOS3NNI~ 'ONO~O 138~\ld NVV>JH8VM dWJ ~ :.ll lV')Ol ONVl 3 § • • • § APPENDIXE Bayside Meadows, Orono, MN .KjOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY Prollidi"I Sound, Balonad, Comprtlitnsivc Natural Resourct Solutions COMMON/GLOSSY BUCKTHORN CONTROL PLAN Phase l -Initial Eradication (September and October) 1. Identify all buckthom with trunk diameter greater than 1.5" measured at ground level within the control areas. Chemically treat with glyphosate, Garlon or Rodeo using cut stump method or girdling. Mark cut stumps with colored wire flag . 2. Identify buckthom saplings less than or equal to three (3) feet tall within the control areas. Treat saplings with foliar chemical treatment glyphosate, Garlon or Rodeo. Phase 2 -Extended Maintenance l. Identify all new growth buckthorn with trunk diameter greater than 1.5" measured at ground level within the control areas. Chemically treat with glyphosate, Garlon or Rodeo using cut stump method or girdling. 2. Identify flagged stumps from Phase I and apply glyphosate to stumps that have re- sprouted. Treat stump shoots with glyphosate, Garlon or Rodeo. 3. Identify new buckthorn samplings less than or equal to three (3) feet tall within the control area. Treat saplings with glyphosate, Garlon or Rodeo. 4. Continue phase 2 methods for the life of the project which ends two years after the completion of construction. COMMON/GLOSSY BUCKTHORN CONTROL METHODS l. The following methods are approved methods of removal and control. Any deviation from these methods needs to be approved by the owner's representative prior to their use . Method 1 -Foliar Chemical Treatment I. Foliar chemical treatment shall be used on buckthorn saplings less than or equal to three (3) feet tall. 2. Chemical spray shall be applied between the months of mid-September through October. Chemical spray shal I not be used between March 15 and July 1. 3. Spray to wet all foliage of saplings. 4. Use handheld or backpack sprayers with ultra-low volume nozzles to minimize contact with desirable existing plants. 5. Apply broadleaf chemical herbicide glyphosate, Garlon or Rodeo. 26105 Wild Rose Lane, Shorewood , Minnesota 55331, Phone : 952-401 -8757, Fax: 952-401-8798 Method 2 -Cut Stump Treatment I. Cut stump treatment shall be used on buckthom with trunks greater than 1.5" measured at ground level. 2. Cut buckthorn as close as possible to ground level and mark with colored wire flag for future identification and treatment. 3. Apply glyphosate, Garton or Rodeo chemical herbicide to cut stump surface, bark exposed above ground, and roots exposed above ground using paint brush, wick applicator or low-volume sprayer. Glyphosate, Garton or Rodeo chemical herbicide to be minimum strength of I 0.0%. Method 3 -Girdling (Frill Cut) Treatment I. Girdling treatment may be used on buckthom with trunks greater than 3" measured at ground level. 2. Cut a frill around entire circumference of trunk as close as possible to ground level. 3. Apply glyphosate, Garton, or Rodeo chemical treatment to entire frill cut and adjacent bark surface using paint brush, wick applicator or low-volume sprayer. Glyphosate, Garton or Rodeo chemical herbicide to be minimum strength of I 0 .0%. HERBICIDE NOTES Garton and Ortho Brush-B-Gon Active ingredient is Tryclopyramine. Mix with water for cut stump , frill, and foliar applications. Apply immediately after cut stump and frill. Glyphosate Glyphosate is the active ingredient in Roundup. Mix with water for cut stump, frill, and foliar applications. 10 to 20% active ingredient is required for cut stump and frill methods. 3% active ingredient is required for foliar application. Apply within 24 hours of the cut stump and frill. Water based chemical. Rodeo is a glyphosate product for aquatic use. Use on plants within wetlands and within 10 -ft of wetland edges. Use the same rate as outlined above for glyphosate. COMMOM/GLOSSY BUCKTHORN CONTROL PLAN -Page 2 of 2 Kjolhaug Environmental Services · Melanie Curtis From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Steve, Carol Pass , Chair, EPIC [cpass@runbox .com] Monday, August 19 , 2013 9:16 PM SChristopher doug .norris; Yvette Christianson; James Wisker Re : MCWD Permit 13-186 I received notice for the August 29th public hearing on Friday and sent you a thankyou for that notice ... a different project. In discussion with Tom, I understood any other notice would require 14 days. Since I hadn't received any actual official notice regarding the Wachrnan project, I assumed it would be in 14 days at least. When you emailed me on Wed. that it was going to your board ... that is not the same thing in my understanding as being involved in a public hearing. Most processes that I have been involved in go to a board, they consider it and then the public hearing follows later. I was counting on official notice for the Wachman public hearing, which I hadn't received until today. Since I was not clear about the one for Wachman on Thursday, when I checked my email, I tried to call you and get clarification. I could not get a hold of you and, given Tom's remarks, I simply thought I should wait for official notice ... official notice is . .just that...'official'. He never mentioned the 72 hour deal.. .so ... I concluded your board would consider this on this Thursday and in two weeks we would have a public hearing.It should not be hard to see that our communication would be understood this way . This misunderstanding is unfortunate, since I will have almost no time to prepare what I wish to say. I will do w hat I can. Perhaps other people have called you about this short notice ... but if not ... then they also must not h ave received this information until today when I did. Perhaps that is even the letter of the law ... Whatever .. .1 just think there should be a lot more public involvement regarding the broader issues that emerge in this proj ect...and that 72 hours for others concerned (assuming there are such) when water quality and wetland mitigation are what's in view. I still find this proces s confusing and pretty opaque for the concerned public. It should serve and inform the broader public ... not primarily tho se that are involved in a project, but all the stakeholders ... this means more than those within 600 ft. when it is a flowing stream that touches all of the properties that the stream crosses and impacts.It seems to me that should be the orientation for an organization named after and in a caretaker role of a historic creek. Carol and Brad Pass On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 2 1 :06:33 +0000 , Steve C hri stopher wrote: > Carol , > The notice went out last week and yo u confirmed that you received it on Friday. Additionally, I let you know v ia email on Wednesday oflast week that this would be go ing to our Board on Thursday of this week. > > Steve Chri stopher > > MCWD Regulatory Program Manager > Direct: 952-641-4506 > > Office: 952-471-0590 1 > 18202 Minnetonka Boulevard > Deephaven, MN 55391 > > --------------- > From: Carol Pass , Chair, EPIC > Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 4:01 PM > To: Steve Christopher > Cc: doug.norris; Yvette Christianson; James Wisker > Subject: Re : MCWD Permit 13-186 > > > Steve, You should have informed me that once you had made a decision as to when this hearing would occur, people would have only 72 hours notice. I have had a hard time finding out anything about any of this from the get-go. It seems to me to be a developer's field day with little input from the surrounding community. I will do my best but...this is really disappointing. When I heard nothing, I naturally assumed a longer time frame. The fact is ... there are conflicts of interest everywhere in this process ... (See the remarks by the Orono City Council that this will increase the tax base flowing to the City of Orono.) What is one to do when they just want to press the issue of water quality, etc.?? Not happy. Do we have to sign up to speak? > > Carol and Brad Pass > > On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 03:20:27 +0000 , Steve Christopher wrote: > >>Carol, > > The previous public notification for comment was a 14-day period. This is simply notification of the public hearing which we follow a 72-hour standard. >> > > Steve Christopher >>Regulatory Program Manager >> > > Sent from my mobile phone >> >> > > "Carol Pass, Chair, E PIC" wrote: >> >> >>Steve , >> >>hanks for the notice. I just saw it today, since I was on lock-down doing taxes. However, the guy (Tom) in regulatory .. services .. ? or whatever that department is called, insisted that the notification requirements were 14 days. M y assumption, since I hadn't heard anything, is that we had two weeks before any hearing ... What's up? Could you explain this? What is the leg al requirement? >> > > Thanks, Carol and Brad Pass >> >>On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 20:04:19 +0000 , Steve Chris topher wrote: >> >>>Carol , >>>I received your voicemail and we will be sending the notification of the Board hearing tomorrow. The meeting will be held at the District office on August 22nd at 6:45pm. >>> 2 > > > Steve Chri stopher >>>Regulatory Program Manager > > > 15320 Minnetonka Blvd . > > > Minnetonka, MN 55345 >>> > > > Direct: 952-641-4506 >>>Office: 952-471-0590 >>>Fax: 952-471-0682 > > > www.minnehahacreek.org > > > [MCWDrgbVert] >>>Presenter I 2013 International LID Symposium August 18-21 , 2013 I Saint Paul, Minnesota 3 Melanie Curtis From: Sent: To: Carol Pass, Chair, EPIC [cpass@runbox .com] Monday, August 19 , 2013 4:02 PM SChristopher Cc: Subject: doug .norris; ychristianson; jwisker Re: MCWD Permit 13-186 Steve , You should have informed me that once you had made a decision as to when this hearing would occur, people would have only 72 hours notice . I have had a hard time finding out anything about any of this from the get-go. It seems to me to be a developer's field day with little input from the surrounding community. I will do my best but...this is really disappointing. When I heard nothing, I naturally assumed a longer time frame. The fact is ... there are conflicts of interest everywhere in this process ... (See the remarks by the Orono City Council that this will increase the tax base flowing to the City of Orono.) What is one to do when they just want to press the issue of water quality, etc.?? Not happy. Do we have to sign up to speak? Carol and Brad Pass On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 03 :20:27 +0000, Steve Christopher wrote: > Carol , > The previous public notification for comment was a 14-day period. This is simply notification of the public hearing which we follow a 72-hour standard . > > Steve Christopher > Regulatory Program Manager > > Sent from my mobile phone > > > "Carol Pass, Chair, EPIC" wrote: > > > Steve, > > hanks for the notice. I just saw it today, since I was on lock-down doing taxes . However, the guy (Torn) in regulatory .. services .. ? or whatever that department is called, in sisted that the notification requirements were 14 days. M y assumption, since I hadn't heard anything, is that we had two weeks before any hearing ... What's up? Could you explain this? What is the legal requirement? > > Thanks, Carol and Brad Pass > > On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 20:04:19 +0000 , Steve Christopher wrote : > >>Carol , > > I received your voicernail and we will be sending the notification of the Board hearing tomorrow. The meeting will be held at the District office on August 22nd at 6:45pm. >> > > Steve Chri stopher > > Regulatory Program Manager > > 15320 Minnetonka Blvd. 1 Melanie Curtis From : Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Hi, All, Carol Pass , Chair, EPIC [cpass@runbox.com) Tuesday, July 30 , 2013 11 :22 AM Steve Christopher; stacy.lijewski; Melanie Curtis pthull; doug .norris ; ychristianson North Arm Creek Lttr 7/26/13 North Arm Creek lttr 7-26-13.doc I am forwarding the attached letter to all of you, which I sent to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District requesting a public hearing regarding the Bayview Meadows Development. Given the state of North Arm and what I know of this land, I believ e it bears much more focus than the development has received. I am sorry that I am coming to these conclusions later than all would wish. Having done a smaller development 12 years ago and believing the area concerned was in a 'preservation' category, I naively trusted that a different outcome would be pursued. I should have checked more closely, but that does not change the facts of the land , the wetland , the creek and the lake ... all of which should be a main concern. That is why I requested this meeting. Thank you. Carol Pass 1 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 15320 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, MN 55435 Dear Mr. Christopher, July 25th, 2013 Brad and I have serious concerns regarding Water Quality issues, Erosion Control and Wetland Protection due to the 5 lot residential Bayview Farms Development being proposed by Mr. Ervin Wachman. We are requesting a public hearing to address issues that we believe are paramount to the health of our adjoining property and especially North Arm Creek, which flows from the basin on the Wachman property to the North Arm of Lake Minnetonka. This basin and creek have delivered clean water to North Arm for the indefinite past, in addition to supplying clean and drinkable water to the many species of animals, birds and reptiles depending on this currently clean source of water, which flows through the large watershed area on its way to the lake. The downstream residents and property owners also have a stake in these concerns as their children have played in the creek and enjoyed its cleanliness for many years. This valley with its water source has been a safe haven for many unique species that once populated all of Minnetonka and now find themselves pressured out of much of it due to major development. It is not possible for those of us who have tried to preserve the pristine character and water quality of the remarkable Minnetonka chain of lakes to s it quietly by while septic systems are clustered around a major drainage basin/ h eadwater that has long served to supply clean water to an already struggling bay. Water quality has always been a serious issue for North Arm, given its steep shoreline and long narrow shape. Furthermore, in all our years of association with Lake Minnetonka, we have only recently seen its beaches closed because of e-coli and its water increasingly dim. The proposed development with its many septic systems in an area of intense under and above ground drainage flowin g to the lake can only seriously exacerbate the se problems. We wish to have at least one public airing of these concerns and to go on record calling attention to and asking for more mitigation of the d eve lopment's negative impact than we see in the current plans. Please arrange a public hearing and the public notification it should have. Thank you. Sincerely, Brad and Carol Pass 235 North Arm Lane Mound,MN and 2536 18th Avenue S. Minneapolis, MN 55404 (612) 280-8418 (612) 916-8418 cpass@runbox .com bpass@ usintemet.com lf OEPARTIEJIT OF NATURAL AESOU!aS WHAT IS A CALCAREOUS SEEPAGE FEN? Calcareous fens are rare and distinctive wetlands characterized by a substrate of non-acidic peat and dependent on a constant supply of cold, oxygen-poor groundwater rich in calcium and magnesium bicarbonates. This calcium-rich environment supports a plant community dominated by "calciphiles ," or calcium-loving species. These fens typically occur on slight slopes where upwelling water eventually drains away and where surface water inputs are minimal. Sometimes they occur as domes of peat that grow to the Soil Drift •coarse Bedrock Recharge zone Fact Sheet Generalized regional cross section: Peat apron formed over valley terrace (diffuse groundwater discharge) Illustration b James Almendin er Science Museum of Minnesota height of the hydraulic head. These settings create an unusual wetland regime where the substrate is almost always saturated to the surface, but flooding is rare and brief. Shallow pools of water in which marl precipitates are t yp ically present surrounded by low, tussocky, grass-and sedge-dominated vegetation. The s ubstrate is s pringy or quaking underfoot. The figures above and below illustrate the geologic features and groundwater flows that lead to the formation of calcareous seepage fens. HOW RARE ARE CALCAREOUS SEEPAGE FENS? Calcareous seepage fens are one of the rarest natural communities in the U nited States. These fe ns have been reported from 10 states, mostly in the Midwest. Approximately 200 are known in Minnesota, most of which are only a few acres in extent. They are concentrated at the bases of terrace escarpments in river valleys in southeastern Minnesota, on the s id es of morainal hill s and valley Till ·calcareous Buried outwash ·coa rse Till Generalized regional cross section: Peat mound formed Recharge area over aquifer window on moraine flank Pothole (localized groundwater discharge) I t Jllustratlon b Jam es Almendm er, Sci ence Muse um of Minne sota sideslopes in southern and west-central Minnesota, and on the downslope side of beach ridges in the Glacial Lake Agassiz basin in the northwest. There are also a few in northern Minnesota where upwe llin g groundwater reaches the surface within large, more acidic peatlands. Page 1 Dece mber 20 I I 1- DEPAl!TIIEKTOF NATUIW.111:SOU!aS Fact Sheet WHY ARE CALCAREOUS SEEPAGE FENS PROTECTED? In addition to the rarity of the community itself, calcareous seepage fens support a disproportionately large number of rare plant species in Minnesota, four of which (*) occur almost exclusively in this community. Eight state-listed, rare plant species are known from calcareous seepage fens: Carex sterilis* Cladium mariscoides* Rhynchospora capillacea* Fimbristylis puberula* Scleria verticillata Eleocharis rostellata Valeriana edulis Cypripedium candidum Sterile sedge Twig-rush Fen beak-rush Hairy fimbristylis Nut-rush Beaked spike-rush Valerian Small white lady's slipper State threatened State special concern State threatened State endangered State threatened State threatened State threatened State special concern Calcareous seepage fens are highly susceptible to disturbance. Reduction in the normal supply of groundwater results in oxidation of the surface peat, releasing nutrients and fostering the growth of shrubs and tall, coarse vegetation that displaces the fen plants. Nitrogen-rich surface water runoff into Groundwater discharge pool s in a calcareous fen . fens promotes the invasion of aggressive exotic plants, especially reed canary grass, that also outcompete the fen plants. Flooding drowns the fen plants. The soft, saturated character of the peat makes almost any level of activity within them, by humans or domestic livestock, highly disruptive. HOW ARE CALCAREOUS SEEPAGE FENS PROTECTED? Under the Minnesota Wetlands Conservation Act (WCA), impacts to calcareous seepage fens are regulated by the Department of Natural Resources. According to the WCA, calcareous fens may not be filled, drained, or otherwise degraded, wholly or partially, by any activity, unless the commissioner of natural resources, under an approved management plan, decides some alteration is necessary (Minn. Statutes 103G.223). In addition to the protection afforded by the WCA, destruction of any state-threatened plants occurring on a calcareous fen may be regulated under Minnesota's endangered species law (Minn. Statutes 84.0895). For additional information, see the DNR website at: http://www.dnr.state.mn.us /ets/index.html . The DNR maintains a list of known calcareous fens, which is available at the DNR 's website at: http://www.dnr.state.mn .us/e co/wetlands.html Landowners or others proposing activities that may affect a calcareous fen or that are interested in protecting or managing a calcareous fen should contact the DNR, Ecological and Water Resources Division at 651-259-5125. Page 2 December 2011 Department of Natural Resources Identification of Known Calcareous Fens Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, section I 03G.223, the following described lands contain calcareous fens as defined in Minnesota Rules , part 8420.0935, s ubpart 2. These calcareous fens have been identified by the commissioner by written order published in the State Register on June 2 , 2008 (32 SR 2148-2154 ), August 3 1, 2009 (34 SR 278) and December 7, 2009 (34 SR 823-824). Additional sites may be added to this li st as new calcareous fens are discovered and existing si te s may be removed from the list if it is determined that the wet land no lon ger meets the definition of a calcareous fen. Future revis ion s to the list will be published in the State Register. The current l is t wi ll also be posted on the DNR's web site at: http://files .dnr.state.mn.us/publications/wa ters/calcareous _ fen _li st_ no v _ 2009 _rev 1.pdf County Fen ID Located in: Calcareous Fen Site Name No. Township RanQe Section(s) Becker Spring Creek WMA South 251 T142N R42W SWNE12 , NWSE13 , NENE13 White Earth 5 34594 T142N R41W NW05 White Earth 6 34595 T142N R41W NW06 Waubun WMA South 191 9 0 T142N R42W NENE01 Anderson WPA 28540 T139N R42W NWNE01 Pederson WPA 34161 T142N R41W SWNW29 Hamden 36 34839 T140N R42W NWNW36 Big Stone Stony Run 19784 T121N R45W ESENE19 Carver Seminary Fen 20977 T116N R23W SWNESE34, SW35 NESWSW35 Chiooewa Chiooewa River Fe n 18688 T118N R41W SWSE23 Kragero 26 26001 T119N R42W NESW26 Watso n Sag Ea st -a 18689 T119N R42W SE36 T unsberg 10 25999 T118N R41W SWNW10 Montevideo Fen 26005 T117N R41W NESW01 Rosewood 31 25195 T118N R40W NESE3 1 W atson Sag SW 18687 T118N R41W SESW16 Watson Sag East -b 18692 T118N R41W NWNW06 Zion Church Prairies 18686 T118N R41W NSW06 T118N R42W SESWNE01, NENESE01 calcareous _fen_ li s t_N o v _ 2009 _rev I .doc Page I of8 County Fen ID Located in: Calcareous Fen Site Name No. Township Range Section(s) Clav Barnesville Swamp Humboldt 1 13722 T137N R45W SESE01 Barnesville Swamp Tansem 18NW 246 T137N R44W NWNW18 Barnesville Swamp Tansem 18SW 6625 T137N R44W SWSW18 Barnesville Swamp Tansem 7a 18814 T137N R44W SESWSW07 Barnesville Swamp Tansem 7b 1973 T137N R44W NSW07 Felton Prairie B Bar B Ranch 252 T141N R46W E13 Felton Prairie County Land 7726 T142N R45W SNW31 Felton Prairie Felton WMA 247 T142N R46W ESE36 Felton Prairie Flowinq 24 7723 T141N R46W WNWSE24 Hauqtvedt WPA South Unit 21259 T137N R44W SWSE32 Clearwater Clearbrook Fen 249 T149N R37W NW17 Cottonwood Delton 20 31977 T107N R35W SESE20 Amo2 35483 T106N R37W SESE02 Amo13 31985 T106N R37W SWSW13 Storden 21 33992 T107N R37W SWNW21 Storden 34 35383 T107N R37W NENE34 Dakota Black Doq Lake Fen -a 242 T027N R24W NW34, NWNE34 Black Dog Lake Fen -b 14373 T027N R24W NNW34 Black Doq Lake Fen -c 31929 T027 N R24W SESE27 , NENE34 Black Doq Lake North 16550 T027N R24W SENE24 Gun Club Lake North 20941 T028N R23W WSE33 Gun Club Lake South 244 T027N R23W W04 Nicols Meadow Fen -a 243 T027N R23W NESW18 Nicols Meadow Fen -b 20942 T027N R23W NWSESW18 Nicols Meadow Fen -c 20943 T027N R23W SWSESW18 Dodge Pheasants Forever WMA 28257 T107N R17W SWSE24 WasiojaWMA 28258 T107N R17W SESWSESW17 Fillmore Chester Fen 9623 T101N R13W SW24 calca reou s _fen_ li s t_ Nov_ 2009 _rev I.doc Page 2 of8 County Fen ID Located in: Calcareous Fen Site Name No. To w nship Range Section(s) Goodhue H olden 1 West 13336 T110N R18W SENW01 Perched Vallev Wetlands 13101 T112N R13W SENWSW08 Red Winq 21 14378 T113N R15W SSE21 Wanamingo 22 29025 T110N R1 7W NW22 Houston Houston 26 14371 T104N R06W NNW26 Sheldon 16 15209 T103N R06W NWNE16 I.Jackson South Heron Lake Wetlands 9198 T103 N R36W NESESW29 Des Moines River North 2892 T103N R35W NWNW08 Kilen Complex 239 T103N R35W SENW17 Belmont 7NE 240 T103N R35W NENE07 Belmont 7SE 24443 T103N R35W NESE07 Petersburg Prairie SE27 25443 T101N R34W NWSE27 Petersburg Prairie SE26 34047 T101N R34W NE26 Kandiyohi New L ondon 24 3198 9 T 12 1N R34W SWNWNE24 Gennessee 21 252 51 T119N R 33W SENE SE21 Regal Mea dow 28864 T122N R33W SWSE15 Koochiching Lost River Fens 34582 T155N R29W E3 5, ESE 35, SENE3 5 , WNW36 , WSW36 Fo re st Grove Fen s 34581 T152N R2 9W WNW03 , NWSW03, NENE04 SESE28 , SSW28 NNW33, Nett Lake Fens 34580 T 065N R22W NE33 , NE SE 33, WNW34, NWSW34 Hay Creek Fens 3458 5 T 154N R27W SWSW22, N ENW2 7 Le Sueur NWS E03 , NWNW11 , Otta wa Fens 13725 T110N R26W ESWSE11 , NWSE14 , NNN E14 Kasota 7 34551 T109N R26W SWNW07 Lincoln Alton a WMA North 34552 T109n R45W NESWSW 3 1 Lyon Shelburne 22 28259 T109N R4 3W SE22 calc areous _fen_ li st_ No v _2009 _rev I.do c Page 3 of8 !County Fen ID Located in: Calcareous Fen Site Name No. Townshio Ranae Sectionfs) Island Lake 23 -a 34040 T111N R43W NE23 Island Lake 23 -b 34042 T111N R43W NWNW24, NENE23 Mahnomen Rosedale 36 15996 T144N R41W SE36 Waubun WMA 13721 T143N R42W NWSW25 Waubun WMA -South 19190 T143N R42W SESE36 Waubun WMA East -a 19130 T143N R41W SE30, ENE31 Waubun WMA East -b 19186 T143N R41W SWSE30 Waubun WMA East -c 19185 T143N R41W NENWNE31 Waubun WMA East -d 27834 T143N R41W SWNE31 , NENW31 Marshall Tamarac River 14381 T157N R46W SESW02 Vikinq 18 14377 T155N R45W NE18 Viking 20 15297 T155N R45W SESWNW20 Viking Strip 4 14379 T154N R45W NW04 Martin Perch Creek WMA 1228 T104N R30W SWSE07 Murray Moulton 11 13672 T105N R43W SWSE02 Sarah Mason WMA 33456 T108N R41W NWSW33 Nicollet Fort Ridqely State Park 1225 T111N R32W NWSE06 Le Sueur Fen 1227 T111N R26W NENE16 Nobles Westside 11 (Adrian) 10568 T102N R43W SWSW11 Norman Aqassiz-Olson WMA 13677 T146N R45W SWNW22 Agassiz-Nelson WMA 35480 T146N R45W NW36 Sorinq Creek 25 35479 T146N R45W NWSW25 Faith WMA-a 13674 T144N R43W SENW26 Faith WMA-b 13675 T144N R43W NW35 Faith Prairie 7893 T144N R43W SWNW25 Green Meadow 22 6131 T145N R45W SESE22 Green Mead ow 26 3942 T145N R45W WNW26 Green Meadow 35 13676 T145N R45W SW36 , SESE35 calcareous_fen _ li st_Nov _2009 _re v l.doc Page 4 of8 County Fen ID Located in: Calcareous Fen Site Name No. Township Range Section(s) Plmsted Hiqh Forest 15 8275 T105N R14W NENENE15 Dover13 2936 T106N R12W NENESW13 Dover 7 8257 T106N R11W NESWSW07 Hiqh Forest 35 8276 T105N R14W NENESW35 Marion 8 31964 T106N R13W NWSW8 Jovce Park Fen 31964 T106N R13W NWSW8 Marion 30 8274 T106N R13W NWSWNW30 Nelson Fen WMA 13727 T105N R15W SWSE16 Rochester 23 31980 T106N R14W SWNW23 Rock Dell 23 Fens 20563 T105N R15W NW23, SWNWNW23 Haverhill 19 31983 T107N R13W NENW19 Otter Tail Eaqle Lake 22 SW 31197 T131N R40W NWSW22 Eagle Lake 27 NW 31199 T131N R40W NWNW27 Eaqle Lake 28 31198 T131N R40W NENE28 Eagle Lake 22 SE 31200 T131N R40W SESE22 Eaqle Lake 27 NE 31201 T131N R40W SENE27 Haugtvedt WPA South 21259 T136N R44W NENE6 Unit (Ottertail) Henning 18 31206 T133N R38W SENWSW18, SWNESW18 Erlandson WMA 28155 T131N R43W SENE25 Aastad 23 28156 T131N R43W SWSW23 Pennington Sanders Fen North 14301 T153N R44W WNE07 , EWSE07 Sanders Fen South 14297 T153N R44W SE18 , NE19 Norden 18 34586 T154N R44W SESW18 Pipestone BurkeWMA 10566 T106N R44W SESE28 Altona WMA South 13726 T108N R46W NENW01 Aetna 29 W 33874 T108N R44W SWSW29 Rock 33 34549 T107N R44W NESW33 Osborne 22 34550 T105N R44W NESW22 Rock 5 NE 34553 T107N R44W NWNE05 Rock 5 South Fens 34555 T107N R44W SESW05, NESW05, SWSWSE05 Burke 28 34556 T106N R44W NWNESW28 ca lcareo us_fen_ li st_N ov _2009 _rev I .doc Page 5 of8 County Fen ID Located in: Calcareous Fen Site Name No. Township Range Section(s) Polk Chicog WMA East 6403 T148N R45W NWSWSE28, SWNE33, NENE33, Chicog WMA West 6405 T148N R45W NE29, WSE20 Enerson WMA 16306 T149N R40W NENW17 Godfrey Prairie 16268 T148N R44W NWSE09, NE09 Gully 27 16326 T150N R39W SWNE27 Gully 22 16303 T150N R39W NE22 , WSE22 Gully 23 16307 T150N R39W SE23 Gully 25 16312 T150N R39W NWNE25 Gully 30 35382 T150N R39W NNE30 , NENW30 , SSE19 Kertsonville WMA 6402 T149N R45W SSESW16 Chester 24 35384 T150N R40W SN24 , NNSW24, NSE24 Chester 29 18396 T150N R40W S29 Kittleson Creek Mire 10149 T147N R44W SS06, OW07 Onstad WMA 16270 T147N R45W W01 Pankratz Prairie South 245 T149N R45W SWNE17 Pembina Trail: Crookston 1226 T149N R44W SSW19 Pembina Trail: TNC 17211 T149N R44W ESWNW30 Thorson Prairie WMA South -a 35142 T148N R45W SE08 Thorson Prairie WMA South -b 33545 T148N R45W NE08 Thorson Prairie WMA South -c 35143 T148N R45W NWSE05 Thorson Prairie WMA South -d 35144 T148N R45W SWNE05 Pope Ordway Prairie Lake Johanna 29 13682 T123N R36W SWSW29 Blue Mounds 15 -a 13755 T124N R39W SW14 , SESE15 Blue Mounds 15 -b 28931 T 124N R39W SENESE15 Ordway Prairie Lake Johanna 30 27364 T123N R36W NENESW30 Ordway Prairie 11550 T123N R36W SENW30 Ordway Prairi e Gilchrist 25 28889 T123N R37W SENENE25 Nora 29 30146 T126N R40W NESW29 Gilchrist 26 28896 T12 3 N R37W SWNE26 Redwood Swedes Forest 19 13724 T114N R37W SW20 , NESE19 Redwood Fen 13723 T114N R3 7W SW22, NENW27 Rice Rice County Wilderness Area 238 T111 N R20W NE34 Bridgewater 34 Rice County Wilderness Area 12448 T111N R20W SESENE22 BridQewater 22 ca lcareou s_fe n_ l ist_No v _ 2009 _rev l .doc Page 6 o f8 !County Fen ID Located in: Calcareous Fen Site Name No. Township Ranae Section(s) Roseau Bemis Swamp 13668 T160N R38W ENW01 , SWNE01 Bemis Swamp East 13669 T161N R37W SWSE29 , NWNE32 Pine Creek Peatland 34584 T164N R41W SW25, NWSE25 Sprague Creek Fens 34583 T164N R40W S34, NW34, SNE 34, WSW35, SWNW 35 !Scott Savage Fen 241 T115N R21W SNE17 , SENW17 , SWNW16 !Stearns Big Lake SW 24729 T123N R31W NESWSW33 Roscoe North 24694 T123N R32W NESE24 SprinQ Hill Fen 24043 T124N R33W N16,SE16 , NWSW15 St. Wendel Swamp SW 23987 T125N R29W S17 Steele Pogones WMA 28256 T105N R19W NWNWSE18 Swift Do Not Enter Fen -a 27178 T122N R37W NE12, NWSE12 Do Not Enter Fen -b 27114 T122N R37W NESW12 Kerkhoven 11 NE 27113 T122N R37W SENE11 Kerkhoven 2 27109 T122N R37W SWSE02 Kerkhoven 11 NW 27112 T122N R37W NENW11 Wabasha McCarthy Lake 31975 T 109N R10W W02 !Wilkin Anna Gronseth Prairie -Akron 10 7072 T134N R45W W10 Rothsay Prairie Tanbera 16 7074 T135N R45W ENW16 , E16 Rothsay Prairie TanberQ 9 7073 T135N R45W ENE09 Rothsay Prairie -Prairie View 33 7070 T136N R45W S33 Rothsay WMA -Akron 4 7040 T134N R45W NE04 Town Hall Prairies 7071 T134N R45W NENW15 Winona Wiscoy 15 10569 T105N R07W SESW15 Wiscoy Valley East 18395 T105N R07W SNWSW03 calcareous_fe n _ li st_ Nov_ 2009 _rev I .d oc Page 7 of8 K:ounty Fen ID Located in: Calcareous Fen Site Name No. Township RanQe Section(s) !Yellow Medicine Fortier 6 19337 T114N R46W SENWSE06 Fortier 5 19334 T114N R46W SESWSW05 Fortier 20 27211 T114N R46W SESENW20 Fortier 22 Fens 27 58 T114N R46W SWNWSW22 Fortier 8 19331 T114N R46W swswswo8 Mound Sprinqs Prairie 250 T115N R46W NE18 Sioux Nation WMA 248 T114N R46W W17 calcareous_fen_ list_Nov _2009 _rev I.doc Page 8 of8 the county auditor. DOR pays out to each of those taxing districts directly, except for the school districts. The DOR certifies to the Minnesota Department of Children, Families and Learning (DCFL} the amount that goes to each school district, and DCFL reimburses that portion directly to the school districts. This is standard procedure that the DOR and DCFL follow. Regarding valuation of land in a WPA, DOR assessors in each county help review records and va luation issues. The DOR assessors re view land value changes and can require the county auditor to adjust the value of a parcel up or down, depending if it is valued too low or too high. County or watershed reclassification Calcareous fens An LGU may request that BWSR reclassify a county or watershed on the basis of its percentage of presettlement wetlands remaining, and, after receipt of sufficient docu- mentation from the LGU, BWSR shall c hange the classification. If requested by the LGU, BWSR will assist in developing the documentation for the change of classification. Within 30 days of BWSR approval of the change in classification, BWSR will publish a notice of the change in the EQB Monitor. One hundred citizens of an LGU may request the LGU to reclassify a county or watershed as described above. Through a petition to the LGU, the citizens must provide sufficient documentation to the LGU for the reclassification. The LGU will cons ider the petition and forward the request to BWSR or provide a reason why the petition is denied to BWSR and the citizens. A ca lcareous fen is a peat-accumulating wetland dominated by distinct groundwater inflows having speci fi c chem ical characteristics. The water is characterized as circumn eutral to alkaline, with high concentrations of ca lcium and low dissolved oxygen content. The chemistry provides an environment for specific and often rare hydrophytic plants. Ca lcareous fens may not be drained or filled or otherwise altered or degraded except as provided for in a management plan approved by the DNR. The DNR will provide technical assistance to landowners or project sponsors in the development of management plans. The DNR will investigate wetlands to determine if the wetland is properly identified as a ca lcareous fen. Furthermore, the DNR maintains a list of kn own ca lcareous fens in the state and their location (avai lable at http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/publications/waters/ Ca lcareous_Fen_List.pdf}, and provides updated lists to BWSR for further distr ibution. Updates to the list will also be published in the State Register. ~ Wetland Conservation Act Manual/ Juf.!J 2004 Pa3e52 ( l. STORMWATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR Wachman Parcel Orono, Minnesota ' ,--;-_:;---, :., : l--,.t",44 L_J PREPARED FOR: Irvin Wachman 2135 Salem Court Long Lake, MN 55356 " ~ . ,'-, ', I I I I ' .. -, ... .............. / Date: January 17, 2013 PREPARED BY: Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. 150 South Broadway Wayzata, MN 55391 ft!C!!IVl!D JAN 2 3 2013 CITY OF ORONO /~~~~s su~~~, SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY. WAYZATA , MN 55 391 • (6 12) 416.-,t(>ITTY f: 9 .hl -~ ~, :~J -~. Stormwater Management Report for Wachman Parcel Orono, Minnesota Prepared on January 17, 2013 Revised on Prepared for Irvin Wachman : Contact 1: Irvin Wachman 2135 Salem Ct. Long Lake, MN 55356 Phone : Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. 150 South Broadway Wayzata, MN 55371 Contact(s): Bob Molstad, P.E. molstad@sathre.com Nate Herman, P.E . nherman@sathre.com (phone) (952) 476-6000 (fax) (952) 4 76-0104 http://www.sa thre.com/ SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY, WAYZATA , MN 55391 • (952 ) 476-6000 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly regist ed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota . Reg . No. 'I ,crgz... Project: Wachman Parcel Location: Eagan, MN Prepared for: Gonyea Prepared by: Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. Date: January 17, 2013 HydroCAD was used to model rate control for this project. Rate Control The table below compares pre-development and post-development l"dtes. Pre-Develo ment Rate Post-Develo ment Rate Pond Elevation NWL Eleva tion Elevation Elevation Pond 975 .0 975.39 975 .96 976. 75 NURP Results (ac-ft) Re uired Dead Stora e 0.15 Re uired Dead Stora •e 0.43 PS (Pre vs. Post Comparison) Pre-Development Resu lts (Surface Outlow lb/vr) Post-Develooment Resu lts (Surface Out PRE- Variable OVERALL DEVELOP MENT Variable OVERALL DIRECT POND RUNOF F PO% 11.2 11 .2 PO % 9.4 7.1 2 .3 P10% 45.8 45.8 P10 % 38 29.3 8 .7 P30% 45.8 45.8 P30% 34 29.3 4.6 P50% 45.8 45.8 P50% 31.2 29.3 1.8 P80% 91.7 91.7 P80% 59.1 58.6 0.5 TSS 229.2 229.2 TSS 162.2 146.6 15 .6 TP 1.6 1.6 TP 1.3 1 0 .3 TKN 8.8 8.8 TKN 7.2 5.6 1.6 cu 0.2 0 .2 cu 0.2 0.1 0 PB 0.1 0.1 PB 0 0 0 ZN 7.4 7.4 ZN 6.2 4.7 1.5 HC 7.9 7.9 HC 6 5.1 0.9 PS (Removal Efficiencies) Post-Develooment Results (Re moval Efficienc y%) Variable POND PO% 49.6 P10% 62.3 P30% 79.8 P50% 92 P80% 98.9 TSS 86.4 TP 59.3 TKN 56.7 cu 62.7 PB 74.1 ZN 50.5 HC 74.1 low lb/yr) Project: Wachman Parcel Location: Eagan , MN Prepared for: Gonyea Prepared by: Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. Date: January 17, 2013 Nurp Design P= Aw= House Roof Area = Ave. Driveway Area= Area Of Street = Topology Pond Total Hardcover Area = Grasscover = Hardcover For Fi = CN = Fi= PerviousCN = 68 0 .14 62.70 SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA. MN 55391 • (612 J 471>-61Xl0 2.5 ·storm 7.60 Acres 13100 SF 17700 SF 28300 SF Area 1.36 Acres 6.24 Acres 1.06 Acres (S treets & Dri ves) CN 98 61 S = R= R = 1000/CN -10 = (P-.2S)(P-.2S)/(P+.8S) 0.24 5.95 V= RAw/12 = 0.15 !Acre -Feet (Required) MPCA General Permit Requirement (1 ,800 cf per drainage acre) V = 1,800A = 13,680 Cubic Feet (Required) Ponding Dead Storage Volume Co ntour 970 970 972 974 975 977 Bottom NWL HWL Area (sf) 0 1,640 3,000 4 ,700 8,400 12 ,200 Based on Plan Contours -10:1 Bench (1 .0') Then 3:1 Slope Cummulative Storage(cf) 0 0 4640 12340 18890 39490 (Acre-Feet) 0 .00 0 .00 0 .11 0.28 !0.43 !(Provided) I0,91 ! Live Storage Dead Storage Volume/Pond Surface Area =2 .25 ft Surface area w/3:1 slope=4265 sqft Average Mean De pth=4.43 ft PONDNET 2.1 FLOW AND PHOSPHORUS ROUTING W. Walker March 1989 Press AL T-G for TITLE--> Dakota Path INPUT VARIABLES .... UNITS case labels NURP Pond watershed area acres 100 7 .60 runoff coefficient 0.2 0 .14 pond surface area acres 0 .19 pond mean depth feet 4 .43 upstream pond p load lbs/yr 0 0 .000 upstream pond outflow ac-ft/yr 0 0 .00 OUTPUT VARIABLE S ........ outflow p load lbs/yr 34.695 1.434 outflow volume ac-ft/yr 66.66667 3.520048975 outflow p cone ppb 191.4753 149.8797815 pond removal % 57.45219 66.69514638 total removal % 57.44994 66.69338188 ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS ............. yrs 0 .5 0 .5 inches 20 20 runoff total p ppb 4 50 450 runoff ortho p/total p 0 .3 0 .3 relative decay rate 1 1 un it runoff in/yr 8 5.557972065 unit export lbs/ac-y 0.815443 0.566526316 POND WATER BUDGETS ...................... runoff ac-ft/yr 66.66667 3.520048975 upstream pond ac-ft/yr 0 0 total inflow ac-ft/yr 66.66667 3.520048975 outflow ac-ft/yr 66.66667 3.520048975 POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS ................... runoff l bs/yr 81.54432 4.3056 upstream pond l bs/yr 0 0 total inflow l bs/yr 81 .544 32 4.3056 net sedimentation l bs/yr 46.849 2.871626222 outflow l bs/yr 34.69532 1.433973778 HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS ............ pond vo lum e acre-ft 4.166667 0.854091377 vlawmo pond vo lum e acre-ft 4.166667 0.220003061 relati ve volume inches 2.5 9.7054488 residence time years 0.0625 0.24263622 residen ce time days 22.8125 88.5622203 overflow rate ft/yr 66.66667 18.25396825 inflow phos cone ppb 450.0238 450.0238411 outflow phos co ne ppb 191.4753 149.8797815 p re action rate 3.173601 6.01283341 1-rp 0.425478 0.333048536 Wachman -PS -Pre-Development -01-17-13 P8 Urban Catchment Model, Version 3.4 Run Date 01/17/13 Case Wachman-Pre -011713.pSc FirstDate 01/01/71 Precip(in) 50.4 Title Wachman-Pre-Dev La stDate 12/31/72 Rain(in) 40.76 PrecFile msp_ 4989.pcp Events 134 Snow(in) 9.67 PartFile nurp50.p8p TotalHrs 16440 TotalYrs 1.88 Case Title Wachman-Pre-Dev Case Data File Wachman-Pre -011713 .pSc Path C :\P8 Urban Catchment Model\P8 Version 3.4\ Case Notes: Storm Data File msp_ 4989.pcp Particle File nurp50.p8p A ir Temp File File msp 4889.tmp T ime Steps Per Hour 4 Minimum Inter-Event Time (hrs) 10 Maximum Continuity Error % 2 Rainfall Breakpoint (inches) 0 .8 Precipitation Scale Factor 1 Air Temp Offset (deg-F) 0 Loops Thru Storm File 1 Simulation Dates Start 6 /1/1970 Keep 1/1/1971 Stop 12/31 /1972 Max S nowfall Temperature (deg-f) 32.0 SnowMelt Temperature (deg-f) 32.0 Snowmelt Coef (in/degF-Day) 0 .06 Soil Freeze Temp (deg-F) 32.0 Snowmelt Abstraction Factor 1.00 Evapo-Trans. Ca libration Factor 1.00 G rowing Season Start Month 5 G rowing Season End Month 10 5-Day Antecedent Rainfall+ Run o ff (inches) C N Antecedent Moisture Condition AMC-II AMC-Ill Growing Season 1.40 2.10 NonGrowing S eason 0 .50 1.10 l Watershed Data Watershed Name DA:E01 ,E02,E03 Runoff to Device PRE-DEVELOPMENT Infiltration to Device Watershed Area 20 SCS Curve Number (Pervious) 65 Scale Factor for Pervious Runoff Load 1 .. Indirectly Connected lmperv Fraction 0.045 UnSwept Impervious Fraction 0 UnSwept Depression Storage (inches) 0 .02 UnSwept lmperv. Runoff Coefficient 1 UnSwept Scale Factor for Particle Loads 1 Swept Impervious Fraction 0 Swept Depression Storage (inches) 0 .02 Swept lmperv. Runoff Coefficient 1 Swept Scale Factor for Particle loads 1 Sweeping Frequency 1 Sweeping Efficiency 1 Sweeping Start Date (MMDD) 501 Sweeping Stop Date (MMDD) 1031 Device Data I Device Name PRE-DEVELOPMENT Device Type PIPE Infiltration Outlet Normal Outlet Spillway Outlet Particle Removal Scale Factor Bottom Elevation (ft) Bottom Area (acres) Permanent Pool Area (acres) Permanent Pool Volume (ac-ft) Perm Pool Infill Rate (in/hr) Flood Pool Area (acres) Flood Pool Volume (ac-ft) Flood Pool Infill Rate (in/hr) Infill Basin Void Fraction (%) Detention Pond Outlet Parameters Outlet Type Outlet Orifice Dia meter (in) Orifice Di scharge Coef Outlet Weir length (ft) Weir Di scharge Coef Perforated Riser Height (ft) Number of Holes in Riser Holes Diameter Flood Pool Drain Time (hrs) Swale Parameters Length of Flow Path (ft) Slope of Flow Path % Bottom Width (ft) Side Slope (ft-v/ft-h) Maximum Depth of Flow (ft) Mannings n Constant Hydraulic Model Pipe, Splitter, Aquifer Parameter Hydraulic Res. Time (hrs) 2 Particle Data Particle File nurp50.p8p Particle Class PO% P10% P30% P50% P80% Filtration Efficiency (%) 90 100 100 100 100 Settling Velocity (ft/hr} 0 0.03 0.3 1 .5 15 First Order Decay Rate (1/d, 0 0 0 0 0 2nd Order Decay (1 /day-ppr 0 0 0 0 0 Impervious Runoff Cone (pp 1 0 0 0 0 Pervious Runoff Cone (ppm 1 100 100 100 200 Pervious Cone Exponent 0 1 1 1 1 Accum. Rate (lbs-ac-day) 0 1 .75 1.75 1.75 3.5 Particle Removal Rate (1 /da 0 0 .25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Washoff Coefficient 0 20 20 20 20 Washoff Exponent 0 2 2 2 2 Sweeper Efficiency 0 0 0 5 15 Water Quality Component Dart_a----,------,----...-----.------,.-----...-----. Component Name T SS T P TKN c u PB ZN HC Water Quality Criteria (ppm) Level 1 5 0 .025 2 2 0.02 5 0.1 Level2 10 0 .05 1 0 .0048 0.014 0.0362 0.5 Level3 20 0 .1 0 .5 0 .02 0 .15 0 .38 1 !content Scale Factor Particle Composition (mg/kg) PO% 0 99000 600000 13600 2000 640000 250000 P10% 1000000 3850 15000 340 180 1600 22500 P30% 1000000 3850 15000 340 180 1600 22500 P50% 1000000 3850 15000 340 180 1600 22500 P80% 1000000 0 0 340 180 0 22500 Pre-Development Results (Surfa ce Outlow lb/yr) PRE - Variable OVERALL DEVELO PMENT PO% 11.2 11 .2 P10% 45.8 45 .8 P30% 45 .8 45 .8 P50% 45.8 45 .8 P80% 91 .7 91 .7 TSS 229.2 229 .2 TP 1 .6 1.6 TKN 8.8 8 .8 cu 0.2 0.2 PB 0 .1 0 .1 ZN 7.4 7.4 HC 7.9 7 .9 I.. Wachman -PS -Post-Development -01-17-13 PS Urban Catchment Model, Version 3.4 Case Wachman-Post -011713.pSc FirstDate 01/01/71 Tltle Wachman-PoS1-Dev LastDate 12/31/72 PrecFile msp_ 4989.pcp Events 134 PartFile nurp50.p8p TotalHrs 16440 Case Title Wachman -Post-Dev Case Data File Wachman-Post -011713.pSc Path C:\P8 Urban Catchment Mode~P8 Version 3 .41 Case Notes: Storm Data File msp_ 4989.pcp Particle File nurp50.p8p Air Temp File File msp 4889.tmp Time Steps Per Hour 4 Minimum Inter-Event Time (hrs) 10 Maximum Continuity En-or % 2 Rainfall Breakpoint (inches) 0.8 Precipitation Scale Factor 1 Air Temp Offset (deg-F) 0 Loops Thru Storm File 1 Simulation Dates . Start 6/1/1970 Keep ~ 1/1/1971 Stop 12/31 /1972 Max Snowfall Temperature (deg-I) 32.0 SnowMelt Temperature (deg-I) 32.0 Snowmelt Coef (in/degF-Day) 0 .06 Soil Freeze Temp (deg-F) 32.0 Snowmelt Abstraction Factor 1.00 Evapo-Trans. Calibration Factor 1.00 Growing Season Start Month 5 Growing Season End Month 10 5-Day Antecedent Rainfall + Runoff (inches) CN Antecedent Moisture Condition AMC-II AMC-Ill Growing Season 1 .40 2.10 NonGrowing Season 0.50 1.10 Watershed Data Watershed Nam e DA:P01,P02,PI DA :P04 Runoff to Device DIRECTRUNO POND Infiltration to Device Watershed Area 12.4 7.6 SGS Curve Number (Pervious) 65 65 Scale Factor for Perviou s Runoff Load 1 1 Indirectly Connected lmperv Fraction 0 .06 0.18 UnSwept Impervious Fraction 0 0 UnSwept Depression Storage (inches) 0.02 0.02 UnSwe pt lmperv. Runoff Coefficient 1 1 UnSwept Scale Factor for Particle Loads 1 1 Swept Impervious Fraction 0 0 Swept Depression Storage (inches) 0.02 0.02 Swept lmperv. Runoff Coefficient 1 1 Swept Scale Factor for Particle Loads 1 1 Sweeping Freq uency 1 0.5 Sweeping Efficiency 1 1 Sweeping Start Date (MMDD) 501 101 Sweeping Stop Date (MMDD) 1031 1231 Run Date 01/17/13 Precip(in) 50.4 Rain(in) 40.76 Snow(in) 9.67 TotalYrs 1.88 Device Data I Device Name DIR ECTRUNO PONO Device Type PI PE POND I nfiltra tion Outlet Nonna! Outlet Spillwav Outlet Particle Removal Scale Factor 1 Bottom Elevation (ft) 970 Bottom Area (acres) 0.038 Pennanent Pool Area (acres) 0.193 Pennanent Pool Volume (ac-ft) 0 .43 Penn Pool lnfilt Rate (in/hr) 0.04 F lood Pool Area (acres ) 0.28 Flood Pool Volume (ac-ft) 0.91 Flood Pool lnfilt Rate (in/hr) 0 .0 4 I nfill Basin Void Fraction(%) Detention Pond Outlet Parameters Outlet Type ORIFICE Outlet Orifice Diameter (in) 12 Orifice Discharge Coef 0.6 Outlet Weir Length (ft) Weir D ischarge Coef Perforated Riser Height (ft) Number of Holes in R iser Holes Diameter Flood Pool Drain Time (hrs) Swale Parameters Length of Flow Path (ft) Slope of Flow Path % Bottom Width (ft) Side Slope (ft-v/ft-h) Maximum Depth of Flow (ft) Mannings n Constant . Hydraulic Model Pipe, Splitter, Aq uifer Parameter Hydraulic Res. Time (hrs) 2 Particle Data Particle File nurp50.p8p Particle Class PO% P10% P30 % P50% P80% Fi ltration Efficiency(%) 90 100 100 100 100 Settli ng Velocity (ft/hr) 0 0.03 0.3 1.5 15 First Order Decay Rate (1/d a 0 0 0 0 0 2nd O rd e r Decay (1/d ay-pprr 0 0 0 0 0 I m pervious Runoff Cone (ppr 1 0 0 0 0 Pervious Runoff Cone (ppm) 1 100 100 100 200 Pervious Cone Exponent 0 1 1 1 1 Accum. Rate (lbs-ac-day) 0 1.75 1.75 1.75 3 .5 Particle Removal Rate (1/da, 0 0.25 0.25 0 .25 0.25 Washoff Coefficient 0 20 20 20 20 Washoff Expone nt 0 2 2 2 2 Sweeper Efficiency 0 0 0 5 15 Wate r Q uality Component Dat,..a----..----..... ----~--------~---------- Com nent Name TSS TP TKN cu PB ZN HC Water Quality Criteria (ppm) Level 1 5 0.025 2 2 0.02 5 0 .1 Level 2 10 0 .05 1 0.0048 0.014 0.0362 0 .5 Level 3 20 0 .1 0 .5 0.02 0.15 0 .38 1 !content Scale Factor Particle Composition (mg/kg) PO% 0 99000 600000 13600 2000 640000 250000 P10% 1000000 3850 15000 340 180 1600 22500 P30% 1000000 3850 15000 340 180 1600 22500 P50% 1000000 3850 15000 340 180 1600 22500 P80% 1000000 0 0 340 180 0 22500 Post-Develooment Results (Surface Outlow lb/yr) p D ost-evelopment es R ults (Removal Efficiency %) Variabl e OVERALL DIRECT POND RUNOFF Variable POND PO% 9.4 7.1 2.3 PO% 49.6 P10 % 38 29.3 8.7 P10% 62.3 P30 % 34 29.3 4 .6 P30% 79.8 P50 % 31.2 29.3 1.8 P50% 92 P80 % 59.1 58.6 0.5 P80% 98.9 T SS 162.2 14 6.6 15.6 TSS 86.4 TP 1.3 1 0 .3 TP 59.3 TKN 7.2 5.6 1.6 TKN 56 .7 cu 0 .2 0.1 0 cu 62.7 PB 0 0 0 PB 74.1 ZN 6.2 4.7 1.5 ZN 50.5 HC 6 5.1 0.9 HC 74.1 r l @> DA :E2 (NO THEAST) TOTAL EXISTING RUNOFF 3 (SOUTHEAST) Routing Diagram for Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc., Printed 1/18/2013 HydroCAD® 10.00 sin 03665 © 2012 HydroCAO Software Solutions LLC Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area (acres) 0.300 0.600 15.600 3.500 20.000 Area Listing (selected nodes) CN Description (subcatchment-numbers) 98 Houses, Drives & Street (E01, E02) 90 Wetland (E03) 65 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG B (E01, E02, E03) 58 Woods/grass comb., Good, HSG B (E03) 65 TOTAL AREA PRE-DEVELOPMENT Printed 1/18/2013 Page 2 r Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solu tions LLC Soil Listing (selected nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (acres) Group Numbers 0.000 HSGA 19 .100 HSGB E01 , E02, E03 0.000 HSGC 0.000 HSG D 0.900 Other E01 , E02 ,E03 20.000 TOTAL AREA PRE-DEVELOPMENT Printed 1/18/2013 Page3 Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC PRE-DEVELOPMENT Type 1124-hr 2-YR Rainfall=2. 75" Printed 1/18/2013 Page4 Time span=5.00-80.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 1501 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method , UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-lnd+ Trans method -Pond routing by Stor-lnd method Subcatchment E01: DA:E1 (WEST) Runoff Area=3.200 ac 3.13% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.43" Flow Length=335' Tc=21.5 min CN=66 Runoff=1.04 cfs 0.115 af Subcatchment E02: DA:E2 (NORTHEAST) Runoff Area=2. 700 ac 7 .41 % Impervious Runoff Depth=0.47" Flow Length=390' Tc=23 .0 min CN=67 Runoff=0.95 cfs 0.105 af Subcatchment E03: DA:E3 (SOUTHEAST) Runoff Area=14.100 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0 .36" Flow Length=455' Tc=29 .8 min CN=64 Runoff=2.74 cfs 0.428 af Link E04: TOTAL EXISTING RUNOFF lnflow=4.47 cfs 0.647 af Primary=4.47 cfs 0.647 af Total Runoff Area= 20.000 ac Runoff Volume= 0.647 af Average Runoff Depth= 0.39" 98.50% Pervious = 19.700 ac 1.50% Impervious= 0.300 ac Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC PRE-DEVELOPMENT Type II 24-hr 2-YR Rainfall=2. 75" Printed 1/18/2013 Paqe5 Summary for Subcatchment E01: DA:E1 (WEST) Runoff 1 .04 cfs @ 12. 19 hrs, Volume= 0.115 af, Depth= 0.43" Runoff by SGS TR-20 method, UH=SCS , Time Span= 5 .00-80.00 hrs , dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 2-YR Rainfall=2.75" * Area (ac) CN Description 0 .100 3 .100 3 .200 3.100 0.100 Tc Length (min) (feet) 21.3 300 0.2 35 21.5 335 98 Houses, Drives & Street 65 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG B 66 Weighted Average 96 .88% Pervious Area 3.13% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 0.0800 0.23 Sheet Flow, 0.0500 Total Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2 .75" 3.35 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps Subcatchment E01: DA:E1 (WEST) Hydrograph I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I 1 I j I ' 1 I I I I i t I I I I I I I I • -~ -:· ~ -: -~ -~ --~ --+ -~ -~· -:--:-.. -: -~-I-~ -~ -Ty~p-e-1, -2~-li r - , ' I I I I I I l I I I I t , I : ' : ' , : 2-YR Rainfall ~2.75'~ ' I I I I I I : : : Runoff Area:3 .200 ac I I ' I I I I ( I I I I I I I I Runoff Volume:0.1 15 at I I 1 I I I L I I ' ' I I ' I ' I ' fl ~notf PeptJl ;:8.4~': :Flow Length ~335 ~ I ' ' I ' I ' ' I I I ' I I I I o I I I I I I I 0 I ' I I ' ' I I I I I I I I I ' I ' I I , I I I I I I ' ' I I I ' ' I ' I I I I t I I I ' I ' I ' I I I ' ' ' ' Tc:21 ~5 min t I I I : CN:66 I t I I I I ' I ' I I ' I I ' t I I J I I I ' ' O ~~ .. ~~....,..~.~....,.,..,....,.f,4~."-· -~~~. ~~~,of.,~~-~~~. ~U.~,4f.f,~~.~~ .. ~. ~~ 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 3 4 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 Time (hours) l D Runoff ~ Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. PRE-DEVELOPMENT Type 1124-hr 2-YR Rainfa/1=2. 75" Printed 1/18/2013 Page6 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment E02: DA:E2 (NORTHEAST) Runoff 0.95 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 0 .105 af, Depth= 0.47'' Runoff by SGS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 2-YR Rainfall=2.75" * Area (ac) CN Description 0 .200 2.500 2.700 2.500 0.200 Tc Length (min) 22.5 0.5 23.0 (feet) 300 90 390 ' I I I 98 65 67 Houses, Drives & Street Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG B Weighted Average 92.59% Pervious Area 7.41 % Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Description 0 .0700 0.22 Sheet Flow, 0.0400 Total I I I I o I I I I I I I Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.75" 3 .00 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway KV= 15.0 fps Subcatchment E02: DA:E2 (NORTHEAST) Hydrograph I I -, -,. - I I I I ' I I I I I j I I I -r--1-, --t -t" -t" -1---'t" -r---, I -, ---, -'" -,--,--, -.,. -r -r--; -; - I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I : Type: I~ ~4-f;lr, 2~V:R Rainfalt~2.75'': : Runott Area~2.tdo ac I I I t I I I I I t I I I I I Runoff vo1:umec::o.:1 os at I t I I I I I : I I I I I I I I I ' ~'1Jr;1Qff O~pt'1;:Q.~7': I I , :Flow Lerigth:=39b ~ ' ' ' . : ' 'fc~23 ~0 min I ' I I I I I , 'CN:::67, I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0~;,4:;~~~ .... ,..,.. ........... -..... ~~;,4:;~~~ ..... ~~~:1',o{;~~~~~~~.~~~~1,4,f~~~~~~~~( 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 Time (hours) l Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC PRE-DEVELOPMENT Type II 24-hr 2 -YR Rainfa/1=2. 75" Printed 1/18/2013 Page 7 Summary for Subcatchmen t E03 : DA:E3 (SOUTHEAST) Runoff 2 .74 cfs@ 12.33 hrs , Volume= 0.428 af, Depth= 0 .36" Runoff by SGS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Ti me Span= 5 .00-80.00 hrs , dt= 0 .05 hrs Type II 24-hr 2-YR Rainfall=2.75" Area (ac) CN Description * 0.000 98 Houses, Drives & Street 10.000 65 Woods/grass comb ., Fair, HSG B * 0.600 90 Wetland 3.500 58 Woods/grass comb., Good , HSG B 14.100 64 Weighted Average 14.100 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 29.3 300 0.1000 0 .17 Sheet Flow, Woods : Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2.75" 0.5 29.8 3 2 . 155 0.1300 5.41 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 455 Total Subcatchment E03 : DA:E3 (SOUTHEAST) Hydrograph ' ' I i I I I I I I I I I 1---I -.,. -I ---1 -T -r -,--1 -1 -r -,--1 --, ·-1 -:--:--,--, --:--r -,----. ---· r -.--,---1 -r -,--1-1 - < I I I ' I I ' ' • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I ! I I I I I J I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I > I I I I < I I I I I I I I I I I I < I < < I I ' I I I I , I I I 1 ---1-J..-1>--I-...J J-'--~-1-...J _ _._.._ Type: II 24-hr, 2 ~ V,R Rainfa ll;:2 . 75'~ ~ _,_ Runoff-Area i:-1.4. i OO -cl.C - I I I I I I I I ' I I I t t I I I : Runoff Vo lume::::0)\28 at I t I f I I I I t I 1 I I I I I ! t 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I , , ' · · · Runoff DeptJ,;:8.36': I I ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I ' < I t I I I I I I I I ' ' I I ' I I I ' ' I :Flow Length:455~ I I I I I I I I I I I I j I I I I j., 1 : ~-~-:--1--:-1-~-~-:--:-----·-----,-T-c :::29 ~8min -· ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I 1 I I I I < I I I < < I I < I I I I I I t I I I < I I I I < I I I I < I < I I I I I ' I ' I I I I I I J I I I I I I I I ' I < I I I I I , 'CN:::64 I I I j I < I I I I ! 1 I I I I < I 04~~~--............. --~~~~.-~~~~.-~~~~~~~~~~.-~~~~~~~~.~-~~ 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 Time (hours) I D Ru nottl Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC PRE-DEVELOPMENT Type II 24-hr 2-YR Rainfa/1=2. 75" Printed 1/18/2013 Page 8 Summary for Link E04: TOTAL EXISTING RUNOFF Inflow Area = 1.50% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 0.39" for 2-YR event Inflow = 12.27 hrs, Volume= 0 .647 af Primary = 20.000 ac, 4.47 cfs@ 4.47 cfs@ 12.27 hrs, Volume= 0 .647 af , Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 5.00-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs 5 4 3 .. ~ ll: 0 Ii: 2 0 ' ' Li n k E04: TOTAL EXISTING RUNOF F Hydrograph I 0 ' ' -I--1---! -L -1--t --l -L--I • ...J -: _: __ :_ Jrttlo,w _~tEJ~;=~Q;~QO~ ~Q, _ I I I ' ' I _ I _ I _I_ I _ I ___ I _ I _ _ _! _ I __ 1_!.__ _I_ .!_ _ _1 _ I _ t _ I _I _ I _ f _ I I ! I 1 I I I I I l I O l l I l I I I ' I I I I I I I I l I I 1-r -,--,-1 -r -1--1-, -r -,-,-, - -I -.i. -~ -t-~ -._ -t -~ --4 -~ -1--I --! - I I t I I I I I t I l I I I ' I I I I -i-r -r-1--,-,- 1 ' I I I I I I I l -r~-T r,·,·r ·r -,-r-, I I I I -1-4 -.4,. -1--t -~ -+--1---1-J. -I--·--I -+--~ I I I I I I I -.J -~ I 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 3 4 36 38 40 42 « 4°6 48 50 52 54 5°6 58 6 0 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 s'o Time (hours) • Inflow D Primary Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC PRE-DEVELOPMENT Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfal/=4.20" Printed 1/18/2013 Page9 Time span=5.00-80.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 1501 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method , UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-lnd+ Trans method -Pond routing by Stor-lnd method Subcatchment E01: DA:E1 (WEST) Runoff Area=3.200 ac 3.13% Impervious Runoff Depth= 1.21" Flow Length=335' Tc=21 .5 min CN=66 Runoff=3.78 cfs 0.322 at Subcatchment E02: DA:E2 (NORTHEAST) Runoff Area=2.700 ac 7.41% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.27" Flow Length=390' Tc=23.0 min CN=67 Runoff=3.24 cfs 0.286 af Subcatchment E03: DA:E3 (SOUTHEAST) Runoff Area=14.100 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.09" Flow Length=455' Tc=29.8 min CN=64 Runoff=11.64 cfs 1.277 af Link E04: TOTAL EXISTING RUNOFF lnflow=17.90 cfs 1.885 af Primary=17.90 cfs 1.885 af Total Runoff Area= 20.000 ac Runoff Volume= 1.885 at Average Runoff Depth= 1.13" 98.50% Pervious = 19.700 ac 1.50% Impervious= 0.300 ac Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC PRE-DEVELOPMENT Type 1124-hr 10-YR Rainfal/=4.20" Printed 1/18/2013 Page 10 Summary for Subcatchment E01: DA:E1 (WEST) Runoff 3.78 cfs@ 12.16 hrs , Volume= 0.322 af, Depth= 1.21" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS , Time Span= 5 .00-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type 11 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.20" * Area (ac) CN Description 0.100 3.100 3.200 3.100 0.100 Tc Length (min) (feet) 21 .3 300 0.2 35 21.5 335 4 3 98 65 66 Houses, Drives & Street Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG B Weighted Average 96.88% Pervious Area 3 .13% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Description 0 .0800 0.23 Sheet flow, 0 .0500 Total Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.75" 3.35 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway KV= 15.0 f ps S ubcat c hment E01: DA:E1 (WEST) Hydrograph f I I I -1--:·--t -t--r--1-""1-..,-t--r--:-;---1 -i---1---1---r-t--r--,-..-,- 1 I I I I I I I I I t I ' 1-I ·· "1 -T -,-•1--I -'f I I : Type: I~ ~4-f:lr, ' I •,; I ~ I • I J. I I Al ft ' I ~ :1 O·n:R r,1 a1n1 all ;:'J.~e , -~ -,--: F.funo ii ·A-rea;i ioo ac - 1 I I I I I l I I I ! I I I I Runo ff v oi:ume =0.322 at I i I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I _ .-• -,--;-• _. -r--,-_, •.• _ ~ _; __ : __ : _R~r:tQJ f _Q~p_th~1 ~~t ~ - · · · : . . · · :Flow t.eri gth:;3 3s ~ · · · : Tc~2 1~s mi n I I I I I I I I I I I -1-I -"'1 -1 , .. , , , , , CN '66 -r -1-·1 -i -·--r--1--,--r -1" -r -·--. -1 -r--r -1·-..., -,. -:::C · · I I I I t I I I I I I ' t I I I I I I t I I 1 I t I l 1 I I I I I 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 2 4 26 28 30 32 3 4 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 Time (hours) j o Runoff~ Wachman -Routing -0 11713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC PRE-DEVELOPMENT Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfal/=4.20" Printed 1/18/2013 Page 11 Summary for Subcatchment E02 : DA:E2 (NORTHEAST) Runoff 3 .24 cfs @ 12 .18 hrs, Volume= 0.286 af, Depth= 1.27" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method , UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.20" * Area (ac) CN Description 0.200 2.500 2.700 2.500 0.200 Tc Length (min) (feet) 22.5 300 0.5 90 23.0 390 3 98 65 67 Houses , Drives & Street Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG B Weighted Average 92.59% Pervious Area 7 .41% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Description 0 .0700 0 .22 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.75" 0.0400 3.00 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps Total Subcatchment E02: DA:E2 (NORTHEAST) Hydrograph I I I I I I t I ! I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I -! _ l _ L I I I I I ! I I I I _ j _ I I_ _I __ I t I I I ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I l I I f I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I I I I I I 0 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I 1 I t I ' I I I < I I I I I I I I I ' , I I I I + I I I I I I ' I I I I --Ty' ne: II ~4-h ~ -~ l 1 .,. I I ' ,1 O~Y.R Rainfall;:4.20'~ I I I ! I I I Runoff Area:2. 700 ac I I I I I 1 I I I I I Runoff Vo lume=0.286 at -r--,--J -~ -"t -r--1--, -""t -I"' -r--1--, -.. -~ -~ -1-_, --, -r -r----, -~ -r -r--1-, -,. -~ -, -1 -., - I , : : ; : : : : ; : : ' 1 ' Rllnoff D~Pt'1 ~1-~1': , : : : ; : : : : : · · Flow Lerigt h~390 ~ , : : : : : : j : : : : : , , I , : , , tc~2a ~o min 11_1 _1_1 __ 11: •1 '1 11 JI I : : : , : , -, ---: -.--:-----I-------:-:--,---Cl\f~67,- I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I > I I ' I I I ' ' I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I l 1 I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I ! I I t I I I O--Vl;~.U,~....,.....,._,.....,.....,.....,.~~~ .. ~.~.,.~.~."-~,.~.~~~.-~-~~~,f,f;~,f,f;~,,4f,~'of,f~~~~~,fo,f,~~ 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 6 6 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 Time (hours) !D Runoffl Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. PRE-DEVELOPMENT Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfal/=4.20" Printed 1/18/2013 Page 12 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment E03: DA:E3 (SOUTHEAST) Runoff 11.64 cfs@ 12.27 hrs, Volume= 1.277 af, Depth= 1.09" Runoff by SGS TR-20 method , UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4 .20" • • Area (ac) CN 0.000 10.000 0.600 3.500 14.100 14.100 Tc (min) Length (feet) 98 65 90 58 64 Description Houses, Drives & Street Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG B Wetland Woods/grass comb., Good , HSG B Weighted Average 100.00% Pervious Area Slope (ft/ft) Velocity (ft/sec) Capacity Description (cfs) 29.3 300 0.1000 0.17 Sheet Flow, 0.5 155 0.1300 5.41 Woods : Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2 .75" Shallow Concentrated Flow, 29.8 13 12 11 10 9 8 I 7 ~ 0 it 6 5 4 3 2 0 6 8 Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 455 Total Subcatchment E03: DA:E3 (SOUTHEAST) Hydrograph --' -" ---------1----------------• • • ----- I I t I I I I I t I I I I I I t I I I ! l I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I l I f I I I 11 i4 h I -r -r · -.--.-, -f -1--:--,-T -T -r -,--,-1 -T -r -,-,--, -T -r -.-----yp·e 1----• 1 r-- I I I I I I l ! I I J t I L I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I • I I I I I I I I I I ',I-ft ' I •' .I: I I •. l"\A .I ·· :-;-:--'.-;-;-:--:-:-~ -;-:--:·· -:-:-~ -:--:--: 1-of T.rt-Ra1n,alt;:~--~u ·;- 1 I I I ! I I 1 l I I I I I I I I I I l I I ! I l I I t -,----:-:-.-,---: ·:-,-.---,-:--:Rur..-off -A-rea~1~.ioo-ac -- , I I 1 I I I I I I I I t I t I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I · ,-,----:-:-:-,--,-,-.--,-,-,--,-:--Runatrvolifme;;~~211 -al - --~ -~ ---:-~ -+ -:--,-~ -1-+ -~ -,--:-~ --~. :--:--~ + -~ -:-1, p }-~ -J,-:-f 0$'~-.. _ L_I_ _·-·· .. '. _~ _: __ 1_ J_ 1 _ 1 _L_. __ . _ _l_ -~ _: __ : ___ u_~~ ___ f!R! __ ~--· ___ : __ I I I I! I I I j It I I I I I I I I I 11 • I L I I I t..·4 '~ _ ~ -~ _:_ -~-~ _ ~ -~ _:_ :_ ~ _ ~ -~ _:_ ~-~ _ J. -~ _: __ :_ ~ _ ~f,o_w eng_t!.:; __ 55 , __ I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I 1 .. L _. _ _J _ .l _ L _ : __ :_ .J _ ~ _ : _ ~ _: _ _J _ .J _ j_ •• ! __ : _ _J _ .J _ 1 _ ~ ___ : .T c:29~.8 -m i.n __ t I I I ! I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I! I I I I\ I I I I 1 t I I I I It. I I It I CN '64 . L _ L _t_ .J -.J -L -L _1_ .J • .l -l. -L -•--1-.J -l. -L _!_ .J -.J -.l. -L _I_ _1 _ .J -l. -L _I_ ' = -- I I l I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I 1 I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I l I I I I I I I ,_ -·-_,_ .J _. -J. -L--·-~ ---1 •• l-..-··'-...J --l -..!. -L--!--1-..I -,1.. -L--1 --l -.! ---L--1-- I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I l I -1--1 -4 -'--~ -1--1 -4 -+ -1--1--I --f ;. -~ -1 --1. -..; --f. -I---- I I t I 10 12 14 16 18 20 2'2 24 26 28 3'0 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 Time (hours) ID Runoff~ Wachman -Ro uting -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10 .00 s/n 03665 © 201 2 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC PRE-DEVELOPMENT Type 1124-hr 10-YR Rainfal/;;4.20" Printed 1/18/2013 Page 13 Summary fo r Li nk E04: TOTAL EXISTING RUNOFF Inflow Area = 1.50 % Impervious, Inflow Depth= 1.13" for 10-YR event Inflow = 12 .23 hrs, Volume= 1.885 af Primary = 20 .000 ac , 17.90 cfs@ 17.90 cfs@ 12.23 hrs , Volume= 1.885 af , Atten= 0%, Lag= 0 .0 min Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 5.00-80 .00 hrs, dt = 0.05 hrs 20- 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 · 12- ~ 11 .!:!. ll 10 ~ 9- 8 . 7 6 5 ' 4 3·, 2 · Link E04: TOTA L EX ISTING RUNO FF Hyd rograph ,- 1 I I t I I + , I I I L I I I I I I I / -1--1 -1 ·-r -,--, -T ----· • ---.--, --. -r ---, -1 ------"l -r ---1 i -r -,---r -r ·1 -1· r-t-,-1- I_ I_ I _! _ ~ _ i __ •• t I I _I I __ l _ ._ _ I l • ! ! - t ! I I I I I I , _ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~: t ---~ ~ ~ = -·: : ~ ~ -·1 ri now~ AJte~~~go ~o~QP t~cj -, ··T-r-1-l-1'-1---,-.. -,--1--1-.. -----r -, -r~-.. ->--1--,--.-r--1-,--+-r-1--t I I I I J ~ -r 1--, -1 r 1--, -,. -,---"1 -,. ---1-., , -r-1--1 ., -r -1 --, -, -1 -1· ·1 - I I I I I I ! I , I , I I I I 1 -1--• -T -r -1-l -T -1--1---r-----, -1 ---C --.,. -j -1--t ---f -,--, -T ---i-I -1 -1---1 - -_1 ---'-_. I I I -L-_.; ___ _ l . -1 .J --l.-I I "1-,-i--------.--1 I I I T -r -I -1 I -' -,--, -.! -·-' __ !._1_ __,_ I I I I I I _ ______ ••• _: ____ 1 _______ T __ , ___ l _ 1 __ I_ l _ L _1 _ J J -I.. _1 _ _J - I I I I I ~ .. ~ I > I I -1 ---1--· -1" -r--,--1 -"1 -+-•1-""I - I I I I I ., ., -r ,-r, r,-1-1 I I I I ---7 --,--. --'j ---I 1 -I--,-.. - 1 • I ---'----·_,---L.-1 .•• -l.-~_I_..J_J_L.. -.J- I I r-....J -.i. -I---.J -...._ -l--·---------~ ----..,. -~ -,.. -1-.. -\... -1 ---• -+ -... -1 --1 -_.. -L.. -1-,.... - I I I I I--, -'t -I'"" ---, -'t -t--1---, -t° -r--1-.. -,.. .. --1-1' -• -r---" -~ -1--· -T -'"' • j---, -"t -•• -!-i - I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I 1 -· --T -r -1-I -T -r ----T -----, -T -,---1 -r . --j -l -... -.---T ---,--1 -T -r -,-1 - o,~-"',,f-, ~~,....,...,.,,,...,.,...,....,,.,,....;,i~~""~~~~~~.~i',i4,~of, ...... ffi""'4~~~:;4,: .. ~f. •. ~.,4.~, ~~.'1.'i4.~.,4',. ~ .. ,1, .• ~.f.. ;.,;_ 4 .. ~( 6 8 10 121 4 1618 20 2224 2628 30 32 34 3638 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 6264 6668 70 7274 76 78 80 Time (hours) • In fl ow D Pri mary PRE-DEVELOPMENT Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfaf/=6.00" Printed 1/18/2013 Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14 Time span=5.00-80 .00 hrs , dt=0.05 hrs, 1501 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-lnd+ Trans method -Pond routing by Stor-lnd method Subcatchment E01: DA:E1 (WEST) Runoff Area=3.200 ac 3 .13% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.44" Flow Length=335' Tc=21.5 min CN=66 Runoff=8.14 cfs 0.651 at Subcatchment E02: DA:E2 (NORTHEAST) Runoff Area=2.700 ac 7.41% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.53" Flow Length=390' Tc=23.0 min CN=67 Runoff=6.8 6 cfs 0.569 af Subcatchment E03: DA:E3 (SOUTHEAST) Runoff Area=14.100 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.26" Flow Length=455' Tc=29.8 min CN=64 Runoff=26.65 cfs 2.659 af Link E04: TOTAL EXISTING RUNOFF lnflow=40.29 cfs 3 .879 af Primary=40.29 cfs 3.879 af Total Runoff Area= 20.000 ac Runoff Volume= 3.879 af Average Runoff Depth= 2.33" 98.50% Pervious = 19.700 ac 1.50% Impervious= 0.300 ac ,.. Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc . PRE-DEVELOPMENT Type 1124-hr 100-YR Rainfal/=6.00" Printed 1/18/2013 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 201 2 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment E01: DA:E1 (WEST) Runoff 8.14 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.651 af, Depth= 2.44" Runoff by SGS TR-20 method , UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-80.00 hrs, dt= 0 .05 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=6.00" * Area (ac) CN Description 0.100 3 .100 3 .200 3 .100 0.100 Tc (min) Length (feet) 21.3 0.2 300 35 98 65 Houses , Drives & Street Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG B 66 Weighted Average 96.88% Pervious Area 3 .13% Impervious Area Slope (ft/ft) Velocity (ft/sec) Capacity (cfs) 0 .0800 0.0500 0.23 3 .35 Description Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2. 75" Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 21 .5 335 Total 9 8 7 6 i 5 i!I 0 ii: 4 3 2 I ' I I ' I I I I I / I I I I I I / I Subcatchment E01: DA:E1 (WEST) Hydrograph ---1 -.J ---L --...1 -.l -.L.. -->--- I I I I I I I ! l I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I t I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I f I I I I I I I I l I t I ---:--:-~ _ :_ r _, __ : _: _ ~ -:-----------:--:-.-.-~ -.--,---t yp,e:1l -24~f.i f I j I I I I t I I I I I ·-v I R I •' '-I I -'-!, A .I -1 -:--:---: -: -:--:-: -~ -:--:--:-: ---,--,--:·100 ~ ,.R-, a1n·ra:ll ;::o:Oc,·:- -~ -:--: -, -r -~ --~ -~ ---~ -,-~ --'. -r -~ -,---:-Ru noff -Area ±3.200-ac - , I l I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I : : : .. : Runoff Voluniec:::0.651 at _ ... -,--1--4 -+ -t,---1-~---I --.,. -,--t--1--t -+--•. ._ -!----1-_..,. -1--1 --o -t--:--!---t--t--+--·--1--i- i : , ' : : : : , ' ' : : : , RuMof f De nth::::2.44'~ 111111 I i i ,11 ,,,,.~1 11 I -~ -:--;-~ -~ -~ -;-~-~ -~ -~ -:-~-, -~ -~ _,_ -:-~ -• -:F,·o-'w-, -~--e'"n_,_g_,t_h-~3'-3-'5-~- + I I I t I I I I I l I I I ' I I ~ ' '~ , I -~-:--'---+-~-:--:-~-1 .. :----: 1-;-~-:--:-: _:_ :--· ~ irC~21 ~.sm~ll - , I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I ___ 1 __ 1 _____ ~. _: __ : _ 1 ______ 1 __ : ~ _ ~ _ ~ _: __ : _ 1 ___ : __ • __ · _ ~ __ !. _ : __ :_ ~ _CN::6_6 _ I I I I I I J I I I I • I t I ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I 1 I I I I ' I I I t I ! I I I I l I I I I r -1---~ -T" -r ----, -r -r -1-., -,. -r -r -,--1 -, -T" -r -i--; -,. -r r -, -., -1 • r -r -,--, - I I l I I i I I I I I t I I ' 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 Time (hours) Page 15 i D Runoff ~ Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. PRE-DEVELOPMENT Type 1124-hr 100-YR Rainfal/=6.00" Printed 1/18/2013 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment E02: DA:E2 (NORTHEASn Runoff 6.86 cfs@ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.569 af, Depth= 2.53" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-80.00 hrs , dt= 0 .05 hrs Type 1124-hr 100-YR Rainfall=6.00" * Area (ac) CN Description 0.200 2.500 2.700 2.500 0.200 Tc Length (min) (feet) 22.5 300 0.5 90 23.0 390 / ' 7 ' 6 5 .. '.2. 4 ~ 0 ii: 3 ... 2 ' 0 98 65 67 Houses, Drives & Street Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG B Weighted Average 92.59% Pervious Area 7.41% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Description 0.0700 0.22 Sheet Flow, 0.0400 Total Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.75" 3 .00 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway KV= 15.0 fps Subcatchment E02: DA:E2 (NORTHEAST) Hydrograph I 1 I I I I 1 -I--1----1 -.j. -4----I--1--I --1. -I--1-_,_ -I - l I I I I , , , : I • , • f • • , • ! , I , • I I I , : TYp,e: I~ ~4-f:lr: -;-;--:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:· -:--:-1:oo~)i:R -R8irlta11~6:0o·~ - t I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I t I I I I I I l l I I I I I I J I _ ~ _; __ :_ ~ _: _ ~ _:_ ~ _ ~ _: _ ~ _:_ ~ _ ~ _ ~ _ ~ _: __ ;_R.unaff _Area::2. 100-ac _ ' : Runoff voi:umec:::0.569 at I I I I ! I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I -~ -:-_,_ ~ -~ -~ -:--{--+ -f--~-I-~ -~ -: -•--:-·:-~ -t:Junolf' -rront~:2:s~·~ - I t ~ I I I ~""' ~ I t I I .:, I l I I I I I I . 1 I I I I I I i _ ~ _, __ ,_ .. _,. _ . __ ,_ ... _ .. _. _ ._ _ ,_ ... _. _ .. _ .__, __ ,_ '_: _f._ow _'--en_gtb.=3.90 ~- I I ' ! I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I ' · · fc:::::23~0 min I I I I I I I --l -~ --t -r -~ -:-~ -: -+--~ · !--. -·: -~ -~ -:-~ -~ -~ -:· -:-~ -·cN-::s·7i - I I I I I l I I I ! I I I I t I I I ' I I · t-·-• --1: -• -t--1---of --t -,_ -t--1--I --t -+--I--! ' ---< +--I--1--1 --+ -t--I--1--f --+--+-·-1--1---f - ! I I I I I I I I l l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ... , "I'" I"' I 'I 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 Time (hours) Page 16 ! D Runoff~ Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. PRE-DEVELOPMENT Type 1124-hr 100-YR Rainfall=6.00" Printed 1/18/2013 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment E03: DA:E3 (SOUTHEAST) Runoff = 26.65 cfs @ 12.26 hrs, Volume= 2.659 af, Depth= 2.26" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=6.00" Area (ac) CN Description • 0 .000 98 Houses, Drives & Street 10.000 65 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG B • 0.600 90 Wetland 3 .500 58 Woods/grass comb., Good , HSG B 14.100 64 Weighted Average 14.100 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 29.3 300 0.1000 0.17 Sheet Flow, Page 17 Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2.75" 0.5 29.8 28·: 26 ·· 24 22 · 20 18- "i' ~ 16 · :I: 0 14 ii: 12~ 10- 8 6 4 · 2 0- 6 8 155 0.1300 5.41 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway KV= 15.0 fps 455 Total Subcatchment E03: DA:E3 (SOUTHEASn Hydrogra ph I I I I I I I l I I I I 1 ...j ---i--L-_1_ -1 ·--.. ---._ _I -"" ---,t.. ---1--· -----\... -1-...I -..I -.i. -\... -1--1 -~ -.._ -\... -1--~ --4 -~ -\... -1-- I I I I I I I I I I I l I I j I 26.65cfs 1 1 1 t • 1 , t 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 r -I -i--I -1 -r I-I I -T ---. -1 r -i-,-I l T I r ,-,-T r I----'l4 -r I _ ~ -~ _:_~ -~ _ ~ -~ _:_ ~-~ ___ L _: __ ._ ~ :-~-_:_ ~-~-~-~_: __ :_1_YR.~_IJ _~_ -~tar. __ _ ' I I l I I I I ! I ' t 1,1 ! I I I J:. I I 1 • ~ .. ~ -~ .:. ~-~. ~ -~ -,-~.: -. -~ .·. ~-~ -. -'-.:.100~-:,~EI-Rain,all;:6~00 ~ .. _ ! I I I I _: ·· ~ 1 -:-·Runoff ·Area~14.-too ac --L -L _1 -' -.,. L L -.J _ .1 -1.. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I -r -~ -,-~-~ -,--~ ·:· ---• ~ • --:-• -~ -"-RutiolfVolume:2~659-al - -~-~-·--,-·-!---,--,-"·, ··:---~---:·-H·c 1 ~-:-.~-p'·T-:--.,-:-i2J,;- -~ -~ -·-~-~ _ ~ -~ _:_ ~--~ _ .. ___ :_ ~-~ __ -~-_:_ ~ nlJ_(IQ _~_ -~J>t _ ~:;--· .. -"'-:-. 1 t I I I I , I I ! I I I I t I I I l L ~ . , -~ . --, --. ;. . ----'. -----• -:--'. -~ --. :--:--:---:flow. Lengtu:;:455 ,-- I I I I l I I l I I I I I I I I I I ! -~ -~ -,-~-.J ---L -.-.J_ .1 _ --~ -:---~ -~--~ -:--:-.l _, -~-:---: Tc::29:.-8 -min-- I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I ! I I I I . r -,--,-1 ,. -"'.""" -r---,-.,. -"T" -r--1-· --1 -T -r -,-,-, -T -r -,--1 1 -T • r -,-CN T 54· - I t t t I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I ' = . L _ L _I _ _I,. -_ l. • I. _1_...; _ -• .i... _ -_1_ -· _ .J _ L _ L _I .J _ ... _.: -L -'-_I __ ..J -~ -L _I_ .J _ .J _ .1 _ L _I __ I I I I I I I ! I I I , I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I r -,---, -, -'" -r -, --, -1 -,. ---,-~ -1 -r -.--,--, -., -T -r--1--, -1 i -r 1--, -, ---... -r· - I I I I I l I I I t I I ____ I __ I_ .! _ L _ I _ 1 _ _I _ J _ ~-_ I_ __ 1 __ -· _ J _ ! _ L __ 1 __ 1 _ _! _ 1 _ L -·- I I l I I I I I l • t ., ' 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 Time (hours) ID Runoff~ Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. PRE-DEVELOPMENT Type 1124-hr 100-YR Rainfall=6.00" Printed 1/18/2013 HydroCAD® 10 .00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 18 S ummary for Link E04: TOTAL EXISTING RUNOFF Inflow Area = 1.50% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 2.33" for 100-YR event Inflow = 12.22 hrs, Volume= 3.879 at Primary = 20.000 ac, 40.29 cfs@ 40.29 cfs@ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 3.879 at , Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 m in Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 5.00-80 .00 hrs , dt= 0.05 hrs 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 i 26 24 3: 22 ~ 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 8 Link E04: TOTAL EXISTING RUNOFF Hydrograph ' ! -,--i -T -I -,-I -1 -1. -.-, - i _ 1 __ !_ -·-· .1 _L _1_ .J_ '· _L _I_ J _ I I I I -1-~ -.,. -r--·-; --r -,--1-.., -1 -,--1 ·--, -1" -1--1-·t -1--t-4 -~ -r--,-; --r -r---1 -4 --t -r -1-"1 - I~-===,.,...=:=~=:=~=!= j ~ i=~ =:=j= t =t _:= ~= t =:J~_tt()w~~r~~~~RO;:O-JOQ~cJ = I j I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -1---1 -r -,-, -~ -r -,-., -T -r -1 -, -T -, · -,-, -r -1 -, -, -r -1--, -T -r -1--, -t -r -,-, - -'-_l _ l_!__l _ _l_.l _I_-·-_1 _ !__ I __ f_J -~ ··'-_1_ 1. L __ I_ J _!_ _I __ 1_ l_!_ _1 __ 1 _ _! _L _I_ J _ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I l I I I I ! I I I I I t I -t-...,. -.+--1--1--1 -+ -:--1--I -'--~ -1--f -.--I -1 --> -.,_ -1--1 --" ---1--1 --+ -I--1---f --f. -I--1-~ - I I I I I I I t I I t I I ! I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I J I I I -,--, -r -r ·-,-, -T -r · -'° , -r -r -·, --, -r -,--1 -, --. -1--, -1 -r -1--1 -T -• -,-1 -1 -r -,-·, - _1 __ I_ l. _ L _ 1_ .J _ 1. _ L _, _ .J _ 1 _ L _1 _ J _ .1 _ 1 __ I_ J _ !. _ L _I_ .l _ ~ _ i __ I_ .1 _ L _1_ J _ J. _ L _r _ .J _ I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I -1---, -.... -~ -1--1 -.... -r--,--, -1--:· -1--, -t--,-··1---t -t--r , --t -t--,--. --t -t--1-, -.,. -i--1--1 - I I I t I l I I I I I I I I ! I t t I ! I I I I I I t I I I I I -.-I -I -t -,-. t -0 1 -I -,-I -I -I -1-I -I -,--1-I -I -I I -l I -,--, -I -I -,-I -I -1 --I -1-...J _ J.-1--1-.J-J. -1---·-...1--1----L--1-~. J..-~-1-4--1----L--1-.J -~ -1--1-+-1----.1-...1-.J.-1--1-.J- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i -,-, -T -r -1--, -r -r -, -, -r -r· -1 -1 r -r· -. -1 -r -1 --, •· T -r -1-, -t -r -1-, - )._L_I_J __ , __ 1 __ 1_.J_l_t _i ••• !_1_1 __ 1 _ _!_L_• __ 1_J_L ___ 1_1 __ t_ 1_ 1 _1 _1_ I_ i I I I I 1 I I I I I I ! I I I I t I I I I I I l I I -)--i --I -... -._ -I --of --+--1--1 --t -t • •• I--I -.i. -I--1--I -+ -.._ -I 4 -..t, -~ I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I -,·--,-.-r-,-,-r -,--,--,-r-r-1-,-r-,--,--i -r -,--1-1-r-,--i-r -,· -,--1-r -,--,-,- ··'-.J _ l. _ L _ 1_ J _ .1 _ •-_1_ .J _ L _ 1 __ 1 _ I _ 1 _ t __ 1 _ .!. _ L _ I_ _/ _ .1 . L _ I __ 1 _ J. _ L _1_ J _ .l _ L -•-J - / I I I I I I I I t I t I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I J I I I I ,--,-T-r -1--1 --,.-~ -1-"""1 -r--1--·1 -;--,.-,--1---t-r-~-;-,. -r -1--1-1'-r-1--,-.-,.-1--1-1- 1 I l I I I I I I l I l l I I ! I I I I l I I I I I ! I I I I --,-1-,-1-,-,-,--,--.-y l __ l_ ""j _ j" _!_ -,-,-,-,--1-1-1. -_1_l _l _1_ -,-1 -1--,-I --1 -J.-L. _,_ .J_ J. -L--1--1 --1----1--1-..I-J.-1--t-.J -i--1-_j_ J -~ _,_ -1-.J. -~-·-..J -~ -1--·-~- I I I I I I l I I .. , 10 121 4 1618 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 Time (hours) !:] Inflow D Primary r e DA:P1 (WEST) e DA :P3 (S UTHEAST) TOTAL PROPOSED RUNOFF e POND Routing Diagram for Wachman • Routing . 011713 P rep ared by Sathre-Be rgqui st , Inc ., P ri nted 1/18/201 3 HydroCAD® 10.00 sin 03 665 © 2 01 2 HydroCAD Software Sol utions LLC Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (selected nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 0.600 98 Houses, Drives & Street (P01, P02 , P03) 7.600 68 SEE NURP (P04) 0.600 90 Wetland (P03) 8.100 65 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG B (P01, P02, P03) 3.100 58 Woods/grass comb., Good , HSG B (P03) 20.000 67 TOTAL AREA POST-DEVELOPMENT Printed 1/18/2013 Page 2 r Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Soil Listing (selected nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (acres) Group Numbers 0 .000 HSGA 11 .200 HSG B P01,P02, P03 0 .000 HSGC 0 .000 HSG D 8 .800 Other P01,P02, P03, P04 20.000 TOTAL AREA POST-DEVELOPMENT Printed 1/18/2013 Paqe3 Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc . HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC POST-DEVELOPMENT Type II 24-hr 2-YR Rainfa/1=2. 75" Printed 1/18/2013 Page4 Time span=S.00-80.00 hrs , dt=0.05 hrs, 1501 points Runoff by SGS TR-20 method , UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-lnd+ Trans method -Pond routing by Stor-lnd method Subcatchment P01: DA:P1 (WEST) Runoff Area=3 .000 ac 6.67% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.47" Flow Length=335 ' Tc=21.5 min CN=67 Runoff=1.10 cfs 0 .116 at Subcatchment P02: DA:P2 (NORTHEAST) Runoff Area=2.000 ac 10.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.50" Tc =20.0 min CN=68 Runoff=0.87 cfs 0 .084 af Subcatchment P03: DA:P3 (SOUTHEAST) Runoff Area=7.400 ac 2 .70% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.40" Subcatchment P04: DA:P4 (POND) Flow Length=455' Tc=29 .8 min CN =65 Runoff=1 .67 cfs 0 .245 af Runoff Area=7.600 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.50" Tc=20 .0 min CN=68 Runoff=3 .30 cfs 0 .318 af Pond P05: POND Peak Elev=975.39' Storage=3 ,463 cf lnflow=3 .30 cfs 0 .318 af Primary=1.08 cfs 0.318 af Secondary=0 .00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=1.08 cfs 0.318 af Link P06: TOTAL PROPOSED RU NOFF lnflow=3.97 cfs 0.763 at Primary=3 .97 cfs 0 .763 af Total Runoff Area= 20.000 ac Runoff Volume= 0.763 af Average Runoff Depth= 0.46" 97.00% Pervious = 19.400 ac 3.00% Impervious= 0.600 ac r ( Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. POST-DEVELOPMENT Type II 24-hr 2-YR Rainfall=2. 75" Printed 1/18/2013 Page 5 HydroCAD® 10 .00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment P01 : DA:P1 (WEST) Runoff = 1.1 O cfs @ 12 .19 hrs, Volume= 0.116 af , Depth= 0.47'' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-80.00 hrs, dt= 0 .05 hrs Type II 24-hr 2-YR Rainfall=2 .75" Area (ac) CN Description 0.200 2 .800 3.000 2 .800 0.200 Tc Length (min) 21.3 0.2 21 .5 (feet) 300 35 335 I ' I ' I I ' I ' ' ' I 98 65 67 Houses , Drives & Street Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG B Weighted Average 93 .33% Pervious Area 6.67% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Description 0.0800 0.23 Sheet Flow, 0.0500 Total Grass: Dense n= 0 .240 P2= 2.75" 3 .35 Shallow Concentrated Flow , Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps Subcatchment P01 : DA:P1 (WEST) Hydrogra ph ' ' I I I I t I I ' I I I I I ! I I ! I ' I I I ! I I I ! I I I ' ' ' I I I I I ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I ! I I I I I _Ty_p~ JI 2 4~f.t( _ ' "1 -'t -t -1--, t I I I I I ' I I I I ' ' I I I ' ' I I I I I I I 0 1 -t" i--,--, -~ -t' ,... -1 -1 - 2~YR Rainfal l:;:::2.75'~ I t I I I I I I I I t I I t I t I I I j I I I I I I I I J I I I I ! I ! J I I ! I I Runoff Area~3 .0 00 ac ' ' I I ' I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I : · · Runoff Vo lume :::::0.:11 s af I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I ' ' I I ' I I I : . ' : · Ru r1 off Pept'1 ~(;).~1': I I I I I ' 1 I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I I I o I ' I ' ' ' ' ' I ' I ' I I I ' I ' ' I ' I I I ! I I , I I I I t I I I I ! I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I ' I I I I ' I ' I ·Fl ow Lerigt h::::335 ~ ! t J I I I I I I J c:21 ~5 min· I I I I I t I I : : : CN ::::6'7 I I I I I I I , I I I I ' I ' ' I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I ' ' ' 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 2 4 26 28 30 32 34 3 6 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 Time (hours) Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10.00 s /n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC POST-DEVELOPMENT Type 1124-hr 2-YR Rainfa/1=2.75" Printed 1/18/2013 Paqe6 Summary for Subcatchment P02: DA:P2 (NORTHEAST} Runoff = 0.87 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.084 af, Depth= 0.50" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5 .00-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 2-YR Rainfall=2 . 75" * Area (ac) 0.200 1.800 2.000 1.800 0.200 CN 98 65 68 Description Houses, Drives & Street Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG B Weighted Average 90.00% Pervious Area 10.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope (ft/ft) Velocity (ft/sec) Capacity (cfs) Description (min) 20.0 0.95 0.9 0.85 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.65 0.6 .. 0.55 ~ 0.5 ~ 0.45 ii: 0.4 0.35 , 0.3 - 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 6 (feet) I 8 Direct Entry, Subcatchment P02: DA:P2 (NORTHEAST) Hydrograph I I f I , I I I ·,-.,-1-r-,-1··1-r -r-1-1-r-.--.--T ·,-,---1 -r · .--,-,--1--,-i-1-r-1--1-,-r -,-,- 1 I I I I I I I I I t ! I I I I t I I I I I l -1-r-1--1-,-,-i--1---,-.--1··,-,----1-1-1--,--1-· -1-.--1-,-,-1 __ _ I ! I I I I I I I I -I -! -1--1-i -f -,-----I -,- 1 ! I I I I I I -1-1-1--1-1 -1·,--1---,-, ! ! I I I ! I I I -I -T -,--1-I -t -,-----I -,- -l_ _ L -'-_1_ ..! _ !. _ 1 __ I _ I _,_ I ! I I I I I I I I _ l _ .!.. _ I_ .• 1_ J _ l_ _ ·--·---L -·- I I I I I I I I I I -+ -~ -:--: · ~ -+ -:--:-r-· -+ -:--:-.-~·-2~ -4·· i -:-- _ _!__!.._-__ r _ __l _.!__1 __ 1_~ _yn~1-1. ---11-11'.-- t I I I I I I I ,-;"t , I I -: -: -:-2~:YFt Bai h-ta 1-1~2 ~ rs·~-: {: ;R~no,l A;ea~iooo~ ae : -:--:--:-: -: -1-:-: -: -:---~-:--.-R-}-~--:-1·1·-v+-:--,:--~·--~-o·--o·--s'-4!.-~_t: __ _ l__l_.J_J._L_. __ 1_..1_1_1__, ___ l_l_l __ ,_. uno . __ o u.,,,.ee: . . -a 1- • I l I 1 I t I l I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -:--:--: -{ -~ :---:-{ -t -:--:--: -·} --~ :--:-~ --~ -:-Aurlo1·1-D6H th~o-~·~- -L _I_ ..J _ J__ L _L _1_ J 1. _L _I_ .-J _ J. _ L -'-..J. J._ ,._ _:_ .. I .. ...J-..1. -'-J . ...J_ 'r'J'! _ll_~-' !~-~ -L I I 1 I I I I I t I I I I I I t I I I I I I t I t I I I 1 ! ! j 1 -L ·'-.J_ ' -L ·'--'-J _ L-L -• . .J_ --L _I_.J_J -L _L -' J _ J _L _I_.J -e-20·0-m,n - l I I I I ' I I I t I t I I I I I I I I I I I I i ~ .. ! _ L. _._ -l _ .J. _ :.. -1--1-.1 -!. -._ -1-..J _ -! _ L _ 1-...J -... -L -L -1-_! -.&. -L -1-.l -.l -L -' --1-..J -.L -L. -1- 1 t I I I I I t I I t I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I CN-68 -L--1-...J-.!. L-L-1-..l.-L -L-,-..J .• '-L-L.....J-.l -1.---1-J -.l.-L -1-....1-.J.-L .. L... J -· -- 1 I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I -1--1---1--+ -1---l--1-~-'--1--1· -:--+ -!· -1----1-._ -:. -~ .. j_ -1--+ 1--1--1 --.C.-J...-1--1--J-+--1--I - I I I J I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I • J.. -1--1-.... -1--1-_,_ ~ -I. -._ -1--1 --+ -L. -1--l -4 -l. -1--·-J -.l -L.. -1-~ --1---1--1-..I -._ -1--t- i I I I I I I I I ! 1 I I I I l I I t--1-4 --+ -I--i --1-• --,--1-4 --+ -I---~ _.. --+ -+-->--1--+ --+ -I--I -I --+ • .. -1--1-4 -+--:--I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I 1 I I I I I I I I -1--+ ··-+ -J-. -!--1-..,1 -+--I--+·--i --+ -;. -1--1 --+ -I--._ -t--+ --+ -0--I -I··-+ -I--t--1·· -1-+--0--I - I I I I t I I I ! t I I I I 1 1 I I I I I ! I I -""t -t--1--1-~ -r -i--1--1 -.., -t--1---i -,--t--i----1---4 -T -r -1--, --t -t--t--1--; -r--r -1 - 1 I I + I I I I I I l I I I I l I I t I I I I I I I 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 6 4 66 68 70 72 7 4 76 ,78 80 Time (hours) ! D Runoff. r l Wachman -Routing -01 1713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist , Inc. HydroCAD® 10 .00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC POST-DEVELOPMENT Type II 24-hr 2-YR Rainfa/1=2. 75" Printed 1/18/2013 Page 7 Summary for Subcatchment P03 : DA:P3 (SOUTHEAST) Runoff 1.67 cfs @ 12.32 hrs , Volume= 0.245 at, Depth= 0.40" Runoff by SGS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00 -80.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 2-YR Rainfall=2.75" Area (ac) CN Description * 0 .200 98 Houses , Drives & Street 3 .500 65 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG B * 0.600 90 Wetland 3 .100 58 Woods/grass comb., Good, HSG B 7.400 65 Weighted Average 7 .200 97.30% Pervious Area 0 .200 2 .70% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 29.3 300 0.1000 0.17 Sheet Flow, Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2 .75" 0.5 29.8 155 455 I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 .1300 Total 5.41 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps Subcatchment P03: DA:P3 (SOUTHEAST) Hydrograph I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I < I I ! I I I I I I ' I I I ' I ' I I I I I_ I I I I t I ' ' I I I O I I I 4 I .! I I I I I , I I ' I I I ' I ' ' I I I I ! I I I I I I I I < I I I I I I I I < I I I I j I I I I Type: I~ ~4-t;l r, 2~YR Rainfal1~2.75'~ I 'Runoff Area~7.400 ac I I I I I I I I I I : · · Runo ff Vo lume::::0.245 at _! I I I f • I I I I I I I I I · : ; · R~~Qt t o~p tJi ~o:~o·~ I I I I I I I I , : : 'Flow Lerigth :;:455 ~ . : · Tc~29 ~a mi n I I I I I I ' , : : CN ::::65 I I I I I I I t I I I ! I I o I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 0 I I I I 1 I I I f I I I l ' I I I o~~~~.....,._,.... ,.,;,,,,......,~~~~~~rif.~~~~~~~-(,,(;,f,.~~~~~~-.~. ;,..,.~~. 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 3 4 36 38 4 0 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 Time {hours) ! D Runoff ~ Wachman • Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC POST-DEVELOPMENT Type II 24-hr 2-YR Rainfall=2. 75" Printed 1/18/2013 Page8 Summary for Subcatchment P04: DA:P4 (POND) Runoff 3.30 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0 .318 af, Depth= 0 .50" Runoff by SGS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.75" * Area (ac) CN 7.600 7.600 Tc (min) 20.0 3 i 2 0 Length (feet) 68 Description SEE NURP 100.00% Pervious Area Slope (ft/ft) Velocity (ft/sec) Capacity (cfs) Description Direct Entry, Subcatchment P04: DA:P4 (POND) Hydrograph ' I J I I I I I I I I I I I ' I ' ' ' ' T ' ' 'll '),f a:.. I ; -T -r -1--1 -_. -t--t--1-~ -"t -t" -~ -:--: • ~ -~ -:--:-~ -~ -yp~ -_.,.~-1:1~ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 2~V:R F.tainfaJl:i:2. 75'': · Runoft Area~'i.soo ac I I I I I I I t t I I I I I I , . . Runoff Volumec::0.31 sat !. -L.. -1-~ .• ..1 _ 1. _ L _1 __ I _ .J _ l. _ L .. L ~ _ .t. _ L L. -1-.J -..I. -L _ L _J_ ..J - ' ' ' fl(n;1qff P~ptJ,~Q.$8 ': tc~2o ~d min ' ' ' I · cN~sa I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I ! I I 1 I I I t -1--,-1-r-1·-,-1-1-r -1--,--. r -,--, -I -T -I -1--I -T -I -C -.--. -I -r -r -i--1 -1 -T - 1 I ,. ' 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 Time (hours) ! D Runoff~ Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC POST-DEVELOPMENT Type 1124-hr 2-YR Rainfall=2. 75" Printed 1/18/2013 Paqe9 Summary for Pond POS: POND Inflow Area = 7.600 ac, 3.30 cfs@ 1.08 cfs@ 1.08 cfs@ 0.00 cfs@ 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.50" for 2-YR event Inflow = 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.318 af Outflow = 12.58 hrs, Volume= 0 .318 af, Atten= 67%, Lag= 24.8 min Primary = 12.58 hrs, Volume= 0.318 af Secondary= 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routing by Stor-lnd method, Time Span= 5.00-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 975.39' @ 12.58 hrs Surf.Area= 9,133 sf Storage= 3,463 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 107.5 min calculated for 0.318 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 107.2 min (1,014.9 -907.7) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 975.00' 74,208 cf Custom Stage Data (Irregular) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation (feet) 975 .00 976 .00 978 .00 980.00 Device Routing #1 Primary Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (sq-ft) (feet) ( cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-ft) 8,440 425 .0 0 0 8,440 10,250 465.0 9,330 9,330 11 ,308 15,690 705.0 25,748 35,078 33,684 23 ,715 805 .0 39 ,130 74,208 45,794 Invert Outlet Devices 975.00' 18.0" Round OUTLET PIPE L= 135.0' RCP, rounded edge headwall, Ke= 0.100 #2 Device 1 #3 Secondary Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 975.00 ' / 962.00' S= 0.0963 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, straight & clean , Flow Area= 1. 77 sf 975.00' WEIR WALL, Cv: 2.62 (C= 3.28) Head (feet) 0.00 0.50 0.50 4.00 Width (feet) 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 979.00' LAND OVERFLOW, Cv: 2.62 (C= 3.28) Head (feet) 0.00 1.00 Width (feet) 20.00 30 .00 Primary OutFlow Max=1.08 cfs@ 12.58 hrs HW=975.39' (Free Discharge) 'L-t_OUTLET PIPE (Inlet Controls 1.08 cfs@ 2.91 fps) 2:WEIR WALL (Passes 1.08 cfs of 3.24 cfs potential flow) Secondary OutFlow Max=0 .00 cfs@ 5.00 hrs HW=975.00' (Free Discharge) 'L-3:LAND OVERFLOW ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Wachman -Ro uti ng -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. POST-DEVELOPMENT Type II 24-hr 2-YR Rainfa/1=2. 75" Printed 1/18/2013 Page 10 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 3 ._,. :§. 2 i ii: ; / / / Pond P05 : POND Hydrograph ' 3.30cfs t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 : 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .. _ -: _:_ ~ -~ ~ -~ _:_ ~ _:_ ~ -~ ~ -: _:_ ~ _ Jnfl ow-Ar-ea :::::Z .600-ac :- l I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I -.,_ -1 -.J -1-_. -L -1-_.. -1-.J. -~ -4 -""--1---! -1-....J -'---t-+ -1--I -i.. -1-.I--1--' -I-_, -'--1 -+ -I- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I i. -1-.J _ 1-..J -L -1-.1 -1-.J _ L J -J.. -1-J. -L ...J -L -1-.1. -1-J -L -1-~ -1--1.-....J -L -•-"--L - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • o 6 8 1012 14 16 182022 2426 2830 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 4850 52 5456 586062 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 Time (hours) [] Inflow 0 Outflow D Primary II Se condary r Wachman -Routing -01 17 13 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solution s LLC POST-DEVELOPMENT Type II 24 -hr 2-YR Rainfa/1=2. 75" Printed 1/18/2013 Page 11 Summary for Link P06: TOTAL PROPOSED RUNOFF Inflow Area = 3.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 0.46" for 2-YR event Inflow = 12.27 hrs , Volume= 0. 763 af Primary = 20.000 ac , 3.97 cfs@ 3.97 cfs@ 12.27 hrs, Volume= 0.763 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0 .0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 5.00-80.00 hrs , dt= 0.05 hrs 4 3 - 2 1 - 0 Link P06: TOT AL PROPOSED RUNOFF Hydrograph I I I -, -·-_, _ --!.. --_1 -..! -._ --....! ---·--.! -!. ---!. -~ -I I _I_ _ !._ I -, I I I I I I I 1 ' : I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -r,-r-~--,-----1------i ----1 -----1 -r -,---r -;--,-1 ---1--1-1 -1 - 1 I I t t ---I" -..----,-... -t• ---1-1 -I"" --1 -t I I I I I I I I I I I ' ,-'t -r -1--, -1 -... -1 --, --- I I ._ -;... -1--1 --'--1---1--l -4,,.. -~ _1 ---1 _ ;... - I I I ;,, .. a· i'o 12 14 16 10 20 22 24 26 20 30 i2 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 .. 74 76 78 00 Time (hours) 1:1 Inflow D Primary Wachman ·Routing· 011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC POST-DEVELOPMENT Type 1124-hr 10-YR Rainfal/=4.20" Printed 1/18/2013 Page 12 Time span=5.00-80.00 hrs , dt=0.05 hrs , 1501 points Runoff by SGS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-lnd+ Trans method -Pond routing by Stor-lnd method Subcatchment P01: DA:P1 (WEST) Runoff Area=3 .000 ac 6.67% Impervious Runoff Depth=1 .27" Flow Length=335' Tc=21 .5 min CN=67 Runoff=3.77 cfs 0.317 af Subcatchment P02: DA:P2 (NORTHEAST) Runoff Area=2.000 ac 10.00% Impervious Runoff Depth =1.33" Tc=20 .0 min CN=68 Runoff=2 .78 cfs 0.222 af Subcatchment P03: DA:P3 (SOUTHEAST) Runoff Area=7.400 ac 2.70% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.15" Subcatchment P04: DA:P4 (POND) Flow Length=455' Tc=29.8 min CN=65 Runoff=6.56 cfs 0.707 af Runoff Area=7.600 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1 .33" Tc=20 .0 min CN=68 Runoff=10 .58 cfs 0.844 af Pond P05: POND Peak Elev=975.96' Storage=8,956 cf lnflow=10.58 cfs 0 .844 af Primary=5.47 cfs 0.844 af Secondary=0 .00 cfs 0 .000 af Outflow=5.47 cfs 0.844 af Link P06: TOTAL PROPOSED RU NOFF Inflow= 16.91 cfs 2.091 af Primary= 16.91 cfs 2.091 af Total Runoff Area= 20.000 ac Runoff Volume= 2.091 af Average Runoff Depth= 1.25" 97.00% Pervious = 19.400 ac 3.00% Impervious = 0.600 ac I.. Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC POST-DEVELOPMENT Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfal/=4.20" Printed 1/18/2013 Page 13 Summary for Subcatchment P01: DA:P1 (WEST) Runoff = 3.77 cfs@ 12.16 hrs , Volume= 0.317 af, Depth= 1 .27" Runoff by SGS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5 .00-80.00 hrs , dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.20" * Area (ac) CN Description 0.200 2.800 3.000 2.800 0.200 Tc Length 98 65 67 Houses , Drives & Street Woods/grass comb ., Fair, HSG B Weighted Average 93 .33% Pervious Area 6 .67% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 21.3 0 .2 21 .5 4- ' ' 3 I ' ' I I I I I 2 I 0 I Ii: I I I I I I I 300 35 335 I ' I I 0.0800 0.0500 Total 0 .23 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.75" 3.35 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway KV= 15.0 fps Subcatchment P01: DA:P1 (WEST) Hydrograph 1 i I I I I l I I I I t I I I I I I 1 I I ! I ! 1 I -,-,.-r-1----,-T-r 1 -i ~-r -r---1 --1 --<;-r -r-,··-,-,--r-r·-1--.---r·r-1-·1-,--r -r-,--,- I ' I I I ' I ' I I I I I I I I 1 l J I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ! l I I I 1 : : I ; ' : : : I : • , I TY Pej II 24-~~ I : : : I I : : ' : :1 O~Y.R Ra infaf 1~4.20'' ---1----, -... -r ---, ---.. -... -1·--, -'1 -r -r -1--1 -., -,.. -:--1--, ---r -r -r--,-., --r -r -~ -1-, - I I ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I ' : : Runoff Area ::3.000 ac 1 I I I ! I ! I I I t ! I I 1 I I : Run off Volume:::0.3 17 at I I I J I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I , . , , , . . , , . , , R , . , ff p . , Ji , 1 21 " I t I ' I I I I I UAO ent -' ' ---"l -T -,... -,--. -·1 -T -r -1-I -·1 -r -r -.--, -, -, I r ---, ~ ,-. r • I -, - ' ' ' : : : : : : : , :Fl ow Leri gtb :;335 ~ I I I : I I t t : : : : : : : TC :21 ~5 min I I I j I I I I I I I I I I I I I r I I l I + ' I I J I I CN ' 67, T --1--, --, -r -r-,-I 1 1 r -,-• 1-I -1 r -r --, --r -r ~ -i-· 4 -• = -, I I I I I I i I I t I I I t I I ! I I I I I I I I l ! ! I ! I l I I I I I 1 l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I i I 1 I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I ' ' 0 -I 1• • ' • •• I 'I I 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 Time (hours) ID Runoff ~ Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC POST-DEVELOPMENT Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfa/1=4.20" Printed 1/18/2013 Page 14 Summary for Subcatchment P02: DA:P2 (NORTHEAST) Runoff = 2. 78 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.222 at, Depth= 1.33" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.20" * Area (ac) CN 0.200 98 1.800 65 2.000 68 1.800 0 .200 Tc Length (min) (feet) 20.0 Description Houses, Drives & Street Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG B Weighted Average 90.00% Pervious Area 10.00% Impervious Area Slope (ft/ft) Velocity (ft/sec) Capacity (cfs) Description Direct Entry, Subcatchment P02: DA:P2 (NORTHEAST) Hydrograph ' ' ' .L-1-.l _ .i-L _I_-'-.J _ J. _L_L _J _ J -1.-L_I_..J_ ,l _ L -:.._ _1_ ..J _ J_ L-L-1_.J_J _1. _L _I_ .J_ '_ L .L_:_J . 3 2 ,-- I I t I l I I ! I I ' · Type: I~ 24-~r . o· ,,,R' ..., , . , ,· '11 ' Al ftA,i :1 , ~ ,: na1n a ;:'f.~l!I : I I I I I I : I I \ , I I I I I I I I f I I ___ ,_ 1_ _: __ : ___ l _ ~ _ ~ _: __ : .6tun_oft _~rea;;2 .. 0.00 _ac _ I I I I I I l I I ! I I l 1 ! I I I f I l I I , ' Runoff vo1 :umec:::o.:222 at I I I f I I I I I I I I I I I l I I ~(Jr,qff 0~pt~~1.a3': : tc:=2o ~d m,n -~ -,--i -1 -·r -r -1---, -t -r -1 -,--, --., -r -r -,--,-~ -r -,-··1-~ -., -r -~ ;_ ~ -CN-;68 - t I I I I I 1 I I I I I o~~~~-,i....,..~..,,..,.,,...~~~~~~~~~~~.~~(,l;(,~~~~~~~~~~~~'.f.t(( 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 Time (hours) (" Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC POST-DEVELOPMENT Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfal/=4.20" Printed 1/18/2013 Page 15 Summary for Subcatchment P03: DA:P3 (SOUTHEAST) Runoff 6.56 cfs@ 12 .27 hrs, Volume= o. 707 at, Depth= 1 .15" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-80.00 hrs , dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.20" * * Area (ac) CN 0.200 3.500 0 .600 3.100 7.400 7.200 0.200 Tc Length (min) (feet) 98 65 90 58 65 Description Houses , Drives & Street Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG B Wetland Woods/grass comb., Good , HSG B Weighted Average 97.30% Pervious Area 2.70% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Description 29.3 300 0 .1000 0.17 Sheet Flow, Woods : Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2.75" 0.5 155 0 .1300 5.41 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway KV= 15 .0 fps 29.8 455 Total I ~ .2 IL Subcatchment P03: DA:P3 (SOUTHEAST) Hydrograph I I ! I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I ! I J I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I ,,--,--t--I --:------1-----. ---t-------.--, -i -I -i -,--.-.. -, -1-----.-• -c -,--1 -j' -:--1---• - 7 I I ! I I I I I i ! I I I I I I 6.56 els 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .. r -:--'.-, -T -~ --~ -~ -~ -r -1 --:-~ -~ -~ _ ;_ -:-~ -r -~ - 1 -~ -1 -Type~ J ~ .24~1J ~ - 6 ' ' : , , : : : : : : '1 b~Y:R Rai nfal1 ~4.28'~ I ! I I I I I I ! I I ! I I I I I I I t 1 I 5 I I -, -,--·-, -: -~ -,-~-~ -:---.-~-~ -~ -~ -:--:-Runoff -Area =7~400-a-c - • I ! 1 I I I I I I I I I I I ' I ,.-1-_, . : : : . : : Runoff Volume::::0.707 at l--L. 1-J -.J 1 "-1--1 ..j. I--L -1--1 l ._ -1, .. -1-, -I. ~ L -' -!--I -.! L "--1-...J 4 ' • , I • : : • : : : : : R , · , ff p · : t"::1 ~s·~ I I I I I I • I I I I ' I I l I ur,o ~I) ~·l •, ! 3 I I I 1 I I I , 1 I I I I I I I I ! I I l I I I .JI I ~ -"-:---~ -! -,--:--·---~ _._ -,--'-{-~ -:--:--:-~ -; -;Flow -Length:'155.- • I I I J I I I 1 I I ! I I t I I 1 I I I I I I 'f c:29~8 mi n I I t I I I I I I I ' I I l 1 • j I I I l I I 2 ---:---~ ---: -,--:---: -:--:-_: _: _: -: -:--: . --~ -:-------~ -:--:-:-ctr:i;s_s _ I I I I I I I I I I : j I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r -1---, -T -r ---, -; -r -1--,-, -, -r -r -,--1 -, -r -r -1---, -r -,--, --, --r -r -r -: --, - t I I : I I I I t I I I I I I I I I 1 I o ~~~~~.,.....l'IPT....,.,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'"4' 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 '32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 5 4 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 7 4 76 78 80 Time (hours) ID Runoff ~ Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC POST-DEVELOPMENT Type 1124-hr 10-YR Rainfa/1=4.20" Printed 1/18/2013 Page 16 Summary for Subcatchment P04: DA:P4 (POND) Runoff 10.58 cfs@ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0 .844 af, Depth= 1.33" Runoff by SGS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.20" * Area (ac) CN Description 7.600 68 SEE NURP 7.600 100.00% Pervious Area Tc (min) 20.0 Length (feet) Slope (ft/ft) Velocity (ft/sec) Capacity (cfs) Description 11 10 9 8 ~ 7 .e 6 3r: 0 ii: 5 4 3 2 0 6 8 Di rect Entry, Subcatchment P04: DA:P4 (POND) Hydrograph I I ! I l I I I I t I I I I I I I 1 I I ' I I ! I I I l I I I I I I I T-1 I I It 24 h ' -r -r -,-I -·r -r -I -1· 1 -T -f -r -,--I -, -T -r -,-, -·1 -T -r · 1--, -,-vp·e .---.. 1 r-- ! I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I t I I l , I , I I -~ -'.-_;_ ~-~ -~ -~ -:-~ -~ _: _ ;_ -: ~-~ -~ -~ -:-~1-01 l '~_r1 _ "a' 1·n' t'a:11;_4! -"""l~- , , , • • t , I I , , I • • I I I I 1 I I y;·n " . ~ .4':u , I I I I I I I I , I I l I I t I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I J I I -~ -~ -:-~ -~ -~ -~ -:-~ -~ -~ -~ -:--:-~ -~ -~ -:-Aun oft Ariea ·::::?-.660 ac-- I I l I I I I I I I l I I I -:-J-+. 1-~-·--:-:-~-Runct>ff-Volume::O j844-at ··- I I I I I I I L I I 1 I I l I I I I I I -:-~ · 1 -T .. ~ ---: -: -;. -:--:-·]-R• •nnff. P~th-:=1 -.3.1)'"~-. I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' ,.. I V ~ ,..."" ~ •.. I J ..., I I I I I I I I I I l L I I I I I I I I I I I l I t ' 1 2 I I I iii I -r--r -1-,-"'I' -r -I -1--,-"T -T -:--1--i-'T -i -r ---, .. -, -"l" -r -1--1-"1 -c.... o· -1\-m,·n-- I I I I I t I I 1 , I l I ! I I I I I I I I I I I -1•U. I I I t I I \ I I I I I I l I I l _,_~_..,._..__ .... _,_-4_ ... _.__~-,-~_ ... _ ........ _._ -1 --l --l-_, • -i-._ , • CN .... .ca I I ' I I I I l I ! ! I--, -I I -I. -,-' ! ...:u - I I I I I I I I I I I I l ! l ! ! ( I I I I I I I I I I L _ L _I _ _I_ .l _ L -~ . .I_ .J _ .1 _ .L _ L _1 __ 1_ J _ 1 _ L _1 _ .J _ .J •• 1 _ L _1 __ I _ J _ L -t I _I_ J _ J. _ L _I __ I j I I I ' ' I I t I I I I I I I I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I j I I I l I I I I I I I I I I I -i -r --~---i -r-~----i-r-~- ' ' I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I t t I 1 -r -,-· ,-,-i -T -r -1--,-, -r -1 -,--, -, -T , -r -r -,-,--, -1 -r -, - 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 Time (hours) ID Runoff~ Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC POST-DEVELOPMENT Type 1124-hr 10-YR Rainfal/=4.20" Printed 1/18/2013 Page 17 Summary for Pond P05: POND Inflow Area= 7.600 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 1.33" for 10-YR event Inflow = 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.844 af Outflow = 10 .58 cfs@ 5.47 cfs@ 5.47 cfs@ 0.00 cfs@ 12.36 hrs, Volume= 0.844 af, Atten= 48%, Lag= 12.9 min Primary = 12.36 hrs , Volume= 0.844 af Secondary= 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0 .000 af Routing by Stor-lnd method, Time Span= 5.00-80 .00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 975.96'@ 12.36 hrs Surf.Area= 1 O, 181 sf Storage= 8,956 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 63 .5 min calculated for 0.844 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 63.1 min ( 936 .1 -873 .0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 975.00' 74,208 cf Custom Stage Data (Irregular) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation {feet) 975.00 976.00 978.00 980.00 Device Routing #1 Primary Surf.Area Perim . Inc.Store Cum.Store {sq-ft) {feet) { cubic-feet) { cubic-feet) 8,440 425.0 0 0 10,250 465 .0 9,330 9,330 15,690 705.0 25,748 35,078 23,715 805.0 39 ,130 74,208 Invert Outlet Devices 975.00' 18.0" Round OUTLET PIPE Wet.Area { sq-ft) 8,440 11,308 33,684 45,794 L= 135.0' RCP, rounded edge headwall, Ke= 0.100 #2 Device 1 #3 Secondary Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 975.00' / 962 .00' S= 0 .0963 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 1.77 sf 975.00' WEIR WALL, Cv: 2.62 (C= 3.28) Head (feet) 0.00 0.50 0.50 4.00 Width (feet) 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 979.00 ' LAND OVERFLOW, Cv: 2.62 (C= 3.28) Head (feet) 0.00 1.00 Width (feet) 20.00 30.00 Primary OutFlow Max=5.45 cfs@ 12.36 hrs HW=975.96' (Free Discharge) t..._1:0UTLET PIPE (Inlet Controls 5.45 cfs@ 4.55 fps) t..._2=WEIR WALL (Passes 5.45 cfs of 12.36 cfs potential flow) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs@ 5.00 hrs HW=975.00' (Free Discharge) t..._3:LAND OVERFLOW ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10.00 sin 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC POST-DEVELOPMENT Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfal/=4.20" Printed 1/18/2013 Page 18 11 10 9 8 ... 7 :e. 6 l 0 Ii: 5 4 3 2 / / Pond POS: POND Hydrograph l I I I I t l t I I I I ,.-1-.J _L _!_ L _L ..1_:_ ..J_.1. _1_ J _L ...J_L_l_...l _I_..J_ L-1-J.._L .J_ L _I_ J _1_..J_L_t_ .1-L J_ L-1-..l _ I f I I I I I l I I I I I l I I I ! ! I I L I I I t I I I I I I 1 I _ J_ I I I t _ J - I I I t I I ! I I j I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I -.. -,-~ -~ ~ ·; -:-~ -~ ~ ---:-~ -:-~ -~tnflow ·Area=i'~soo-ac~ I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I -~ -:-~ -~ ~ -~ -:-~ -~ ~ -~ -:-~ -~ ~ -~ -:-~ P.:.ar •~ 1:1e1 ,,.:.-9~5 -·~,;-·-~ - I ! I f I I t I I l I I I I I L I I ! " , ~ ~ , 'f..,. , 1 ;; 1 • .:,y I -f -,-I -I -! .. T -,-1 -,-·1 -r -1-1 -,--! -r -1-1' -,-i -r -1-·, -,--, -I -,-T -i-l I ··1 -l - _ ~ _: __ : _ ~ _: _ ~ _:_ ~ _ :_ ~ _ ~ _:_ l _: __ : _ ~ _: __ : _ :_ Sto_ra~e;:_8;.956 ~ cf~ _ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I t I ! I I E I I I I I L _ 1_ .J _ L _I_ l _I_ J _ L .J _ !. _l _ J _ 1_ .J _ L _1_ l _ L J _ L _t _ .1 _ I_ .J _ L _1_ l _ I_ J _ L _I_ j _ I I I I I I E I I ! I I I I I ' .L. -1-.J -L ..J -.i. -1-..J -L .J -L -1-.J -1-..J -L -1-J. -L ..J -!--1-.J. -1-...J -L -1-_. -I. J -L -1 -.J. - I I I I E t I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I ,--1--1-t--t-"t--l--t-t' -1-~ -1--t-1--t-t--··1-+-t--t -r-1--t-1--1-t--1-+ -1--!-r-1 --t •• I I l I I I I t I I I I I I l I I I I L I I I ( l I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I T -1-, -r-, -T -,--, -r., -r -,-1 -1--, -r -1-,. -r., -r -,-, -.--,-r -,-1 -r, -r -,-, - I I I I I I I I L I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r I I I I I I I r I ' I I ' I r -1-1 -r -, -T -,-1 -r 1 -r -.-1 -1--1 -1 -,-T -r -, -r ··, -1 -.--, ·· r -i-T -,-, -r -, -1 - I I I I I I I I I L I I I I I I I I I I I I I -1-r1----1----r~-1-r1-r----r1-r--~- ' ' ' 6 8 10 12141618 2022 2426 283032 3436 3840 4244 4648 5052 5456 5860 6264 6668 70 72 74 76 7880 Time (hours) [] Inflow O Outflow D Primary a Secondary r Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10 .00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC POST-DEVELOPMENT Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfal/=4 .20" Printed 1/18/2013 Page 19 S ummary for Link P06: TOTAL PROPOSED RUNOFF Inflow Area= 3.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.25" for 10-YR event Inflow = 12.24 hrs, Volume = 2.091 af Primary = 20.000 ac, 16 .91 cfs@ 16 .91 cfs@ 12 .24 hrs, Volume= 2.091 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0 .0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 5 .00-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs 18 . 17 16 15 · 14 13 12 .. '.£. li: 0 IL Link P06: TOTAL PROPOSED RUNOFF Hydrograph I I I I l i I I I I I I I I I I I -T -1--1--, ---t --i ---z--, -, -r -.----:----1-----, -• --, -----"j - I I l I ,--I -i -· -----.--,-- -. -:-t-.--:·· ~ ---:--:-.! -t-·--: : -~ -:1n (le;>w :Ar:e~;:20~·000 ,a c - -----------------·-.. ---j ----· ------I I I I I _J _ J.. _ ..._ _1 .1 _ .L _ I __ , _ J -i -L _. _ J -L _ 1_ -' -l -o.. -....J -.J. -'---.J - I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I _ t ___ ! _ L __ .., _ .1 ___ I_ J _ 1 _ L _t _ ..1 _ i _ 1 __ l _ J _ L _ 1 __ 1 _ .J _ L _ 1 __ , _ ..i. _ L __ J _ ..1. ____ _J _ I I I I I I I l I I I I -..J -.J. -'---....I ;.. -L... -1-_. -.1. -'-.1 -.J -L -L -.J -• -L -I_ -1 -J -._ -_ -1 ___ L. _ ! _ -_ I I I I I --~ -J -... ---1 -... -~ ---I -... -... -· --~ -... -,_ ---4 -j,._ -._ --... -I,.. -,_ --.... -I--·-..:. ---;_ --..I. - I ' --,--4-+----1-"'1 -+-1----f-+--t--,--+-•--1--r--,-1--1------.. ---1--0- 1 I I I -!--I -,.. -· ,-----..,. -I--1-~ -+. -~ ---+ -+. -,--. --f -+--1---"' -~ -I--· --'" -~ -1-~ -.,. -,---~ - I I ---. -... -~ -1-""I -... -r -1---. -r -r--, -"1 -t' -1--, -1 -t--·--1 -., -~ -1---'T ---1--, --t' -,--, --. - I I I -,--,-,. -,-----,-·---i--.-... -r .. 1-,-.,.-,---"T -r -.--,-, -r-1---... -r -,--,-,.-r -,--- ' I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I -,--, -T -,--,-., -,. -r -1-.... -T -r -,-1 -r -.--1 -"T -r -r -1 ---r -, --T ---.---1 -----. - I I I I f I I I I ! I , I I I -1--, -T -r ---, ---; ----r -~ -1 -1 -T -,--1 -1 -1· -,--, -1 -r -,---... -----, ------·, - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --. ---c --., -T -,--1---r ---,-1 -·,· -,---1 -r ---1 -i -r -,-----;--------c-----1 - I , I I I I I l t I I I f I I I I l I ---I -I-,---"; ---,--------I ·-i ----I -I -t -, -I -i ·-------------,---I - I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I ·----~--~-;----------~-i-r··-,-,-~~---~-1------------~---- • I I I l I I I I t I I I I ------I -----, -I • --1--i -7 -,--, -"i -i" --··1 ---I -1--, ---;----, ---,----- I 8 10 1214 16 18 20 2'2 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 °40 4244 °46 48° 50 °525°4 5 1 6°58 60 62 6 4 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 Time (hours) El Inflow D Primary POST-DEVELOPMENT Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfal/=6.00" Printed 1/18/2013 Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 20 Time span=S.00-80.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 1501 points Runoff by SGS TR-20 method , UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-lnd+ Trans method -Pond routing by Stor-lnd method Subcatchment P01 : DA:P1 (WEST) Runoff Area=3.000 ac 6 .67% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.53" Flow Length=335' Tc=21.5 min CN=67 Runotf=7.94 cfs 0 .633 af Subcatchment P02: DA:P2 (NORTHEAST) Runoff Area=2.000 ac 10.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.62" Tc=20.0 min CN=68 Runoff=5.73 cfs 0.437 at Subcatchment P03: DA:P3 (SOUTHEAST) Runoff Area=7.400 ac 2.70% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.35" Subcatchment P04: DA:P4 (POND) Flow Length=455' Tc=29 .8 min CN=65 Runoff=14.62 cfs 1.450 at Runoff Area=7.600 ac 0 .00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.62" Tc=20.0 min CN=68 Runoff=21.77 cfs 1.660 at Pond POS: POND Peak Elev=976.75' Storage=17,666 cf lnflow=21.77 cfs 1.660 af Primary=11.58 cfs 1.660 at Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 at Outflow=11.58 cfs 1.660 af Link P06: TOTAL PROPOSED RUNOFF lnflow=37.46 cfs 4.179 af Primary=37.46 cfs 4.179 af Total Runoff Area= 20.000 ac Runoff Volume= 4.179 af Average Runoff Depth= 2.51" 97.00% Pervious = 19.400 ac 3.00% Impervious= 0.600 ac Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. POST-DEVELOPMENT Type 1124-hr 100-YR Rainfall=6.00" Printed 1/18/2013 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment P01: DA:P1 (WEST) Runoff = 7.94 cfs@ 12.15 hrs , Volume= 0 .633 af, Depth= 2 .53" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method , UH=SCS, Time Span= 5 .00-80.00 hrs, dt= 0 .05 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=6.00" * Area (ac) CN Description 0 .200 2 .800 3 .000 2 .800 0 .200 Tc Length (min) (feet) 21 .3 300 0 .2 35 21.5 335 8 7 6 .. ~ 5 ll: 0 ~ 4 ' ' ,_ , ' 3 , ' 2 --I 98 65 67 Houses, Drives & Street Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG B Weighted Average 93.33% Pervious Area 6 .67% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Descriptio n 0 .0800 0 .23 Sheet Flow, 0.0500 Total Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2 .75" 3 .35 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps Subcatchment P01: DA:P1 (WEST ) Hydrograph ' I I I I I I I I I I t I j I ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -:--1--,-,---i---,--,-1 -1-1--,--,-1-,-,---1-1-1 -1-1--------------r---1-- ' ' : . : : : : : : : : : ' Type II '>4-h r, I l 1 1 I I I I I I I I ~ -~ -:---~ -~ -~ -:· :-: -:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:--:-1~00:vR -R&1 ntar1;;-s:oe·~ - -"_: __ --_; -~ _:_ ~ ~ _: -~ _:_ ~-~ -"-~ _: __ :_R·u· noff -A-rea' -3-0' o'e-a'c:_ I I I i I I I I I I I j I I I I ~• -• I ! I I r ' I I I I I I I I I I I t I I ___ · ___ ~ ___ · __ : __ : _ ~ _ ~ _ : __ : __ :_~_~_:_B u n.off _Vo lume:0.633 a f. _ I I I I I ! I I 1 I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I : I I I I I I ' ' ' ' I I t I I I I I ' I I I I I fl ~n off Pepth ;::~.53': , • -:· ~-:-r -r -,-:-: : _: _:_ -:-~ -;-Flow -l ength-~335 ~ - ~ ·--~~-~I-~~~-'. :--~ ~ ~-~: :_~ ~-~-:--tc:2 1:s~min - j I I I I I I I I I t I l 1 I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I c~· I s~ _ L _ , ___ J _ ..t. _ L _ 1 __ 1 _ J _ l _ L _1_ ..J _ ..L l _ L _ 1 __ 1 _ J _ 1. _ L _ -__ ... _ l _ I_ -•-.J _ ' I-~.= _f J _ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I J I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I ! I I I l ! l I ! I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I ! J I I I r -i---""i -------, -,. -r -r -,--, -1 -r -r -,--1 -, ------· -1 -, -,----, -,. -r -1--i--. - ! I I I a 1'0 12 14 1s 1a 20 22 24 ·2s 2a 30 32 34 36 ia 4'0 42 44 46 48. so 52 54 56 58 so s2 64 ss s's 70 72 74 76 78 so Time (hours) Page 21 !D Ru nott ~ Wachman -Ro uting -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. POST-DEVELOPMENT Type 1124-hr 100-YR Rainfal/=6.00" Printed 1/18/2013 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment P02: DA:P2 (NORTHEAST) Runoff 5. 73 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.437 at, Depth= 2.62" Runoff by SGS TR-20 method , UH=SCS, Time Span= 5 .00-80 .00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type 1124-hr 100-YR Rainfall=6.00" * Area (ac) CN 0.200 1.800 2.000 1.800 0.200 Tc (min) Length (feet) 20.0 6 -' 5 4 .. ~ 31: 3 0 ii: 98 65 68 Description Houses, Drives & Street Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG B Weighted Average 90.00% Pervious Area 10.00% Impervious Area Slope (ft/ft) Velocity (ft/sec) Capacity Description (cfs) Direct Entry, S ubcatchment P02: DA:P2 (NORTHEAST) Hydrograph I I I I I I ..L _ L _I_ ..J --1 -L -L _I_ J _ .l -L -L -1-_1 _ .J -..L -L _1_ ....J _ ...1 _ 1.. -1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I ! I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I ' -1-J _ .1 -L -L _I _ ...J - I -~ -~ -~ -:-~--~ -~ -~ -:-~-~ -~ -~ -:--:-1~0·0-.1i~~-R1-fta" ·1nL j -a~n::.:~-01 ~--~ - I I I I I f I I I I I I l ' I I r ,: n • ...o. u I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I , , , , , , · Flunoft Area::2.000 ac -I • 0 ..., --l -.... -~ -t -~ --+ -"' -~ -1-_, _ -l -4--~ _,_ -I --J -'" -L.--1--' H ..... -... -1-_,_ -I - , , , · , Runoff vo1:ume=0.~37 at I I ! I I l I ; I I I I I I I I I • L _, _ _._ ~ _,. _ ~ _: _ _. _ ~ _ L _ ~ _: __ ;_ ~ _RYno11 oep_tb ~2!~i·~ _ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' : : tc:i:20 ~0 min I I I I I I I I l I I I I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I c~• .... sa -1--1--1--I -+ -I--1--l -_. -!--~ -1--.I -4 -;... -I--1--I -~ -I--I--1--1--+ -+. -J.--1--I --·~--- 2 0 ! I I I t I I I l I I I ' ' ' -I--1--t ---+ -+ -t--1--I -•t -T' -I-·I-' --1--+--~--1--I ---+ -t---t--t-~ ---t -lo -I--1--t -~ -I--I--1--I - I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I "'I 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 Time (hours) Page 22 Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist , Inc. POST-DEVELOPMENT Type 1124-hr 100-YR Rainfaf/;;;6. 00" Printed 1/18/2013 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment P03: DA:P3 (SOUTHEAST) 1.450 at , Depth= 2.35" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method , UH=SCS, Time Span= 5 .00-80.00 hrs, dt= 0 .05 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=6.00" Runoff = 14.62 cfs@ 12.26 hrs, Volume= * * Area (ac) CN 0.200 3.500 0 .600 3.100 7.400 7.200 0.200 Tc Length (min) (feet) 98 65 90 58 65 Description Houses , Drives & Street Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG B Wetland Woods/grass comb., Good , HSG B Weighted Average 97.30% Pervious Area 2.70% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Description 29.3 300 0 .1000 0.17 Sheet Flow, Page 23 Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2.75" 0 .5 155 0.1300 5.41 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 29.8 455 Total ~ .e. 1 IL 16 . 15 - 14 - 13°· 12- 11 · 10 9 . 8 .. 7 6 5 -. 4 3 2 Subcatchment P03: DA:P3 (SOUTHEAST) Hydrograph 1 I I , I I I I ! I I I I , I I I I I ,--,-' -----.----i -1 -r ---.--, -1 -r ---1--, • 1 --1· -.--1 ---T -r ---, -, -T -r ·1-.., 1 --r -.-- I I I l J I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----.. -+--I--1--t --t -.--I-.• --i --t -'f' -... -1--1 --t -•• -I--1---~ --t -I,. ---1 -_. -+ -r,--1--, --t --t -I--1-- , I I_ -- I I 1 I I I I , f I I I 1 I I -; -L -:-_,_..I_~_._ ._ J 1 _ ~ __ -:·· _1_ ~ _ L -~-:-_J_ J • .L _ ~ -;--:-r y·pLe~-i,-z ,1·.:-1,r.-_ I I I I ' I I I I ! I I I I I I -a;i 1 ] :-~:~::-:: ~: · ~: ::: :-~ ~ ~: ~ ::: :_::: ~: :J o:o;ve~ Ra-intaif~sJi a~':~ ~ I , I I I I I l ! ! 1 1 I I I I -~ -~ -:--: ·-.l -L -~ -·-~ ---7 -~ -:--··· ~ -,. -~ -:-Ru·noH-Area ::::"1.400 ac -- ! I I I I ! I I I I I I -: ·: ·:-·:· --:-:--,·· -.-~ -~ -C -:---:-• -RffriolfVoli.ime=~~450 -ar -1--,._ -1--i -~ -,+--,----~ --<I -+ -I--t--I .., -+ -I--1--1 --1 -1' -t----1 --, -+ -I--1--I ---t -1--1-- · · · · · · · · · · · · R · 11· o · · h · ~ as· " _ L _ L • I. _1 • J • L -'-_ .. ~ _ l -J. -L -0. --J • • -L --~ -un Q -· ent, _--' -I_ 1111111!1!1 1 11 Il l , t"1 r-• ,I I I I I I l I I ' I I I I I I 1 j I I I I I I I 1-I I I ..... I .JI. I .J -,-:--:--1 --: -1 -:--1--:-, -~ -~ -:·· -1 -·:-:-:--:--.--.--F. ow ..:engt ll:;'t55;-- t--1--1--I "'t -.--1"'· 1--1 --+-t-t-I-•, ""-T-t--t--t-""'1-T-r--l-·l--,-1'"-/--l--f ·-j-"1"-r-1-- I , , • • ' I c· ·"·g· 8 m·t" L_I ___ _J_..1,_!_L_1 __ , ,_ ... _L 1 ___ .J_l._L .. 1 __ ,_J ~,La.;_ ._. __ I I I I l I I I I t I I I I I I I' I I I I I I I 1 I I CN 65 r 1 -• I T • -, -'T ,-• ,-! -. -I -• --1 ··1 r -r 1 : - I l I I I I I I I ! , I I I I I--I--•--1--+ -1-1-· -i--, -,t -'t" I--1 ---_. -f" -t--J--, ---~ -~ ---1-.. ---r -1--i -t -..--1--I- I I I I I I j I I I I I l I I I I I I t I ' I 1 J.. -1_ _ _ l _ L _1_ .J _ -, _ .I. _ ... ___ 1 _ J _ .,_ _ L -•-_1 __ J _ ~ _ L _ t __ I I I I I i ! I I l I I l I I ! J I I I I I -i T j -. -I --I --1 -(-- o~· """"~~....,,,,....,,..,..~......,.....,~~~~~~~"'f1'i~wft',~~~~~~~f;'i,4'~~,f,wf~~~~~""' 6 8 10 1'2 14 ;·6 18 20 2'2 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 '42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 .. 72 7 4 ·.,6 78 80 Time (hour s) ID Runoff ~ Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. POST-DEVELOPMENT Type 1124-hr 100-YR Rainfal/=6.00" Printed 1/18/2013 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 ©2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment P04: DA:P4 (POND) Runoff = 21. 77 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 1.660 af, Depth= 2.62" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5 .00-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=6.00" * Area (ac) CN Description 7.600 68 SEE NURP 7.600 100.00% Pervious Area Tc (min) 20.0 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 i 14 13 ~ 12 £ 11 u.. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Length (feet) Slope (ft/ft) Velocity (ft/sec) Capacity (cfs) Description Direct Entry, Subcatchment P04: DA:P4 (PO ND) Hydrograph _1 ___ l._L __ _ ___ ,_ --~---~- I I I I r -1--, -T -r -,--,--1-'1 -r -r -1-1 -.,. -,---r -1--,--, -.,.. -r--1--, --, --t -r--1--1 --, -1" -r -1--t --, -..,. -,--1-- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I 1 I I I ! 1-2L77cfs ;--,--,--1-1-1-,--1 -,-,-,-,-.--1-1-1-1--,--,-1-,-,---t-·i-1-1 ·,--1-1-1-1-1-- -~ -~ -:-~ . ~ -~ -~ -;-~ -; -~ -~ -:--:-~ -~ -~ -:-~ -~ -7 -~ -:--;--r ; -~ -•-,·1-,;-A_-i:..-· i-- 1--,--·· 1 ·· r -,--, -1 -1 -, --1-1 -1 -T -1 -,--i -1 -r -i--1-, -1 -, -1 -,--1-it-YR-e.-i -+-, !..I r'~-- ,- 6 8 -"_._ _, _ _._, -'-_._ _,_ .,_ ~ -L-'-_, _ _,_, -'-_,_ -'-1o"o ·L-.;"·R·-""'" -.~ -t -'1.-i -.,..-kA ,,---~-~-:-~-~-~-~-:-~-~-!--~-:--: ~ : : : I +Yi na.1n,-a 1~0 --v u -:-- -L _ L _1 __ 1 _ J _ .L _ L _t •. _J .1 _ l _ L _1 __ I_ ..i _ J. _ L _I ___ J _ 1 _ L -'--' · ..J _ l _ L _I . _I _ _J _ l -L _ I_ - -~ -:--:-~ -~ -~ -~ -:-~ -~ -~ -~ -:--:-~ -~ -~ -:-Run off -Ariea :::7--.600 ac -- I I I t ! I t I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -~ =: =:= ~= ~ = ~ =~ =:~ ~ =: =: ~ ~ =:= ~= ~ =: =Run aff va1um~~~ ;6s<f af = I I I I I ! t ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I ( I I I I I -~ •• ~ _:_ ~ -~ -~ --~ _;_ ~ -I -~ •• ~ _:_ -' -~ -~ -~ _:_ ~ -b l.1-flo ff-pent~:2-.62 ~~-- I I I I I I I I I I I , I I l I I I I ~,. I 1 • t t"' ,-., I I I I -r -~ -,--, -1 -r -,--i--, -T -r ·· r -,--,-1 -r ·-r -,-1 -, -T -r -i--,-, -T -r 2---, -:i -T -r -,-- -L -L -'-_J -.J. -.L -L -'-..J -.~ -l. -L _ 1 __ 1 -J -i. -L -'-..J -..J -l -L _ I __ 1 _ Jr c... o, -0 -m 1-n -- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I 1 ~f ~ i• , -r -r -1-, -, -r -r -,--, -i -r--r -,-, -, -r -r -1-., --, -i -r--1-1 -, -T ·-~ -,-·1 -, --r -r -1---~ -:--:--:-~ -}-:--:-:-~ -}-:--:--:-~ -;--:--:-~--:-~ -~ -:--:-~ -·:· -~ -:-CN:::68·- -t--1--1---i-~ -t--~ -1----t · t--t--1-_, -·t -.; -1--1--1--1 -...--t--1--i ---! -<" -'· -1--1--t -"1' -I--I - I I I I I I I I t l I I t I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I -I I ---I -I -'j'" -I--1-j -I -j" -,--,--. -"'j -I -i" --j -j -I -I -,--. -I -j" -I -,--, -I "j -f -1-- . t--1---1-~-.:-!.-1--1-.J --+ -~ -1---1-· .-!--'-.f-_, -1-_._ .J-J. -1---1-~-~ -.i.-1--•--'--l-~ -1--1-- , I I 1 I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I --r -.--1-1-r-,--,--,-r-r-r-.-· -1 -,-r -r -,--,--,-T-,-,--1-,-T ·-r -,--,-,-,-r-,-- _L_L.._I_ ..J_ J _ l,. _L _I_ J_ J._' _1 __ 1 _ __i _ ..l _ L _L _1_ ...J_.J_ J. _L_I __ 1_ J _ 1._L _I_ .J .• ..J-..1 _ L _I_ - I I I 1 I t I I I I I r -r -1-, -, -r -r -1--, -T -r -r -1 --, --·1 -r -1--1--, --, --r -r· -,--1-, -r -r -,--, -·1 -T -r -,-- J _ .I. _ I_ _ 1 __ 1 _ • 1 _ l _ L --_, . .J -.! -· L -·-- I I I I I I I I I ••• , ·1 10 12 14 16 18 20 2 2 2 4 26 2 8 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 Time (hours) Page 24 ID Ru noff~ I.. Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. POST-DEVELOPMENT Type 1124-hr 100-YR Rainfal/=6.00" Printed 1/18/2013 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 25 Summary for Pond P05: POND Inflow Area= 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 2.62" for 100-YR event Inflow = 12.13 hrs, Volume= 1.660 af Outflow = 7.600 ac, 21 .77 cfs@ 11.58 cfs@ 11.58 cfs@ 12.34 hrs, Volume= 1.660 af, Atten= 47%, Lag= 12.2 min Primary = 12.34 hrs, Volume= 1.660 af Secondary= 0.00 cfs@ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routing by Stor-lnd method , Time Span= 5.00-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 976. 75' @ 12.34 hrs Surf.Area= 12,143 sf Storage= 17,666 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 45.5 min calculated for 1.659 at (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 46.5 min ( 899.1 -852 . 7 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 975 .00' 74 ,208 cf Custom Stage Data (Irregular) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation (feet) 975.00 976.00 978.00 980.00 Device Routing #1 Primary Surf.Area Perim. In c.Store Cum.Store (sq-ft) (feet) ( cubic-feet) ( cubic-feet) 8,440 425.0 0 0 10,250 465.0 9,330 9,330 15,690 705.0 25,748 35,078 23,715 805.0 39,130 74 ,2 08 Inv ert Outlet Devices 975.00' 18.0" Round OUTLET PIPE Wet.Area (sq-ft) 8,440 11 ,308 33,684 45,794 L= 135.0' RCP, rounded edge headwall , Ke= 0.100 #2 Device 1 #3 Secondary Inlet I Outlet Inv ert= 975.00' / 962.00' S = 0.0963 '/' Cc= 0 .900 n= 0 .013 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Are a= 1.77 sf 975.00' WEIR WALL, Cv= 2.62 (C= 3.28) Head (feet) 0.00 0.50 0.50 4.00 Width (feet) 4.00 4.00 4 .00 4.00 979.00' LAND OVERFLOW, Cv: 2.62 (C= 3.28) Head (feet) 0.00 1.00 Width (feet) 20.00 30.00 Primary Outflow Max=11 .56 cfs@ 12.34 hrs HW=976.74' (Free Discharge) 't.....1:0UTLET PIPE (Inlet Controls 11.56 cfs@ 6.54 fps) 't.....2:WEIR WALL (Passes 11.56 cfs of 30.12 cfs potential flow) Secondary Outflow Max=0.00 cfs@ 5.00 hrs HW=975.00' (Free Discharge) 't.....3:LAND OVERFLOW ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Wachman -Routing -01 1713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. POST-DEVELOPMENT Type 1124-hr 100-YR Rainfal/=6.00" Printed 1/18/2013 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 03665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 24 22 20 18 16 i 14 i 12 ii: 10 8 6 4 Pond P05: POND Hydrograph _!,. •• _. __ J_• I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I·· 21 .77cfs ~ -:-~ -~~-7-:-.I -: ~-:-:-~ -:-~-~ -:-7-~ ~-~ -:-~ -:-~-:· -:-~ -~ ~ -~ -:-~ - ,-, --~ -:-~ -: ~-~ -:-~ -~ ~-~ -:-~ -:-~-~1-nflow -Area::1-.600-ac~ - I -I - I I _I _ .J - I--t - I ,-, -/ t I ! I I t I I I I I I I I , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . , , -P . , k ~I ' , '9"!!1-L::! 7$', -1-,-,-,-1-i··,-,-,-1-1-,-1-,--,-,-1-1 -a!:111 -1 AV-; t iu -· .-1- 1 , , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r t 1 "'Y. • V ~ 1 ,• 1 -; -·-~ -~ ~-;-:-~ -~ ~ -~ -:-~ -:-~ -~ -:--~ s: Jto-~r-'aj_e~--i:~7: ~6~6-'6 : c-'Ti - I I t I 1 I f I I I I I I I 1 I l I n ._,1 ' l , I 1 ; -·-~--~~-·~---~~-·~-·-~~-·-~·-~~-~~-~~~-·~-·-~~-·~-~- ' I I I I I ·r-1-,--.,-1 -1-"1-r-,-, -,-,-,-·1-r -,-T-r-,-r-,-,.-,--,-r -i-T -11 -r -1-T- 1 I I I ! I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .. t -, -I -,-I -,--I -t . :-I -I--, -I -, -I -.--, -t -,-I -,-"j -i -.. t - I t I I l I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I J I I 1. _ I_ J _ L .J _ •. _,_ J _ L ..J _ L _1 _ J _ I_ J L _1_ l _ L ..J _ L _1 _ l _ I_ .J _ L _!_ .1 _ L ..J _ I _1 _ .1 _ I I t I I I I I I ! I I l t--r--t -1---1 -T -1--1 -I--1 -t--1---t -r" ...; -t--1-T -t--1 -'!-" -!--+ -I·· --! • 1---,--t -I--i +--1-·!-- I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I 1 l I I I I r-,-, -r -,-T -1-,-r -,-r-,-,-r -,-r-,-T-r 1-r-1-T-,--,-r-,-r-r ,-r -,-., - I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 6 8 10 1214 1618 2022 24 26 283032 3436 3840 4244 4648 5052 5456 5860 62646668 707274 76 7880 Time (hours) Page 26 [] Inflow O Outflow D Primary D Secondary Wachman -Routing -011713 Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. POST-DEVELOPMENT Type 1124-hr 100-YR Rainfal/=6.00" Printed 1/18/2013 HydroCAD® 10 .00 s/n 03 665 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 27 Summary f or Li nk P06: TOTAL PROPOSED RUNOFF Inflow Area = 3.00% Impervious , Inflow Depth= 2.51 " fo r 100-YR event Inflow = 12.21 hrs, Volume= 4.179 at Primary = 20.000 ac, 37.46 cfs@ 37.46 cfs@ 12.21 hrs , Volume= 4.179 at, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 5 .00-80 .00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs 3 6 3 4 3 2 30 28 26 ' ~ 2 4 .e 2 2 . ~ 20 U: 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 6 8 Li n k P06 : TOTAL PROPOSED RUNOFF Hydrograph ' -__ J _ l. _ _ _ ! . !_ _ 1 ·' ___ 1 __ , _ _J _ !,. ___ 1 _ J _ .!. __ -' ___ !_ _ , __ 1 ___ L_ _ _! ___ 1 _ _1 _ .! -1_ -__ I _ I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I t --'-1 LI J_.L L_I_J_J.. L .• ! J_l_l ___ J._L ___ , ___ L._l __ , _ _.._L_I_ J_.J._L _J_ I I I I I I ! I I ! I 1 =:= :;~: ~ ~ =:=: ~ ~ =~ =:= ==; == =:= ~ = ~ =.1nntt,Mr:Ar~a=2o ~·ol)o ~c~ = / 1 I I I I I I I I l I I I I I 1 1 I -!--, ---,----. -----,-.. -I ------I ----------t-----,-----I---I -1-...J _ .._ -L _;_ ..J -J. -L -1---J. ----..J ---1---_ -L ----..l -1--·--•-J. -1--1-..J _.., -L. __ ...J - I 1 l I I I I I I 1 I I I I I -1---.,. -I--1-"'1 ---1---1--; -,--~ -; -"1 ---1-,--+ • t"" -!----r-----~ -~ -1- 1 I t I I ; I I I I t I I I I I -,--i-r -i -1--1 -•• -,--,---r -,--,-1 -----,----------r -i----:----- _, ___ ,!. _ !,_ _ 1 __ !_.!,__I_-~'-_ -!.. •. --·-j ---,_ --------· _ -_____ ---!_ -- I I j I I I I I 1 I I 1 -... -1--- I I I I -i-1-1--.-1 :_1_1 __ ,_ I l I I _l_-' -.L -L --J -.,. -L -'-....J -l.. L --.I -... _ 1_ --_.. _ .L. -L .J _ .. -_t_ --_ .l --_I_ .J _ --L __ .J _ I I I I I -1-.,_..,. -r--·--1 -'t -r--1--,-i--,--1-;-'t ---.,-r----.-., -r--;--i-,.-r--·-4-~-,--1--,- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 t I I I I I -1--. -T -r -1--, ---r -,-, -T -r -,-, -r -1---·, -r ---, -, -r ----T -r--. -t -1 -r -1 ·· , - , __ , _ ~ _ ! ___ , ___ !.. _ l ______ --__ .!. _ '-_, __ 1 _ _I _ I_ _ -J _ I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1---J.. -L. ----l -J. -L --.J -J.. -1... -' -.J -J. -L. --j -:.. -'--J -.J -L ----.L -1... -' -.J _ .i. _ L __ .J _ I I I t I I I I t I I I I I I I t I --, -i-r r-• -----Tr-,---, r ---, I I I I ! I I I I I I -,--,-I -r -,---·r ------T --~,--. -T -r .. -I - ..! --I __ I --- t I i I .!_• ___ J _ I I I .J -_. -L. --J - I I ,. -1-1-t -r 1--1- I 'I ' t ''t'' I •••" 1•••" "'l "'I ''I 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 2628 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 4648 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 7 4 76 78 80 Time (hours) II Inflow D Primary City of Orono Memo From: Melanie Curtis Willie Gibbs, SSTS Manager A-J ~ To: Date: 1/29/2013 Re: Bayside Meadows Proposed Plat I have reviewed the preliminary septic system designs for the 5 proposed lots in Bayside Meadows Addition . The designs show two standard septic sites for each lot with a proposed house site. Lots 2-5 would allow some flexibility in final house location . Lot 1 does not allow for any flexibility and should be noted as such . The septic sites split much of the lot and along with the wetland limits the house site to basically where it is proposed . I have stamped approvals for the five proposed sites. If you have further questions please let me know.