Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-08-1985 Council PacketMINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 8, 1985. PAGE 1 ATTENDANCE 7:00 PM The Orono Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Butler, Councilmembers Grabek, Frahm, Tim Adams, and Lynn Adams. The following represented the City staff: Police Chief Kilbo, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron, Building Inspector Jacobs, City Attorney Radio, and Recorder Sutton. CONSENT AGENDA* Counci lmember L. Adams asked that item N 11 be removed f rom the Consent Agenda for discussion. Mayor Butler removed item #12 from the Consent Agenda. Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda*, subject to items 11 and 12 being removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion, with all staff reports concerning these items to be attached to an original. copy of these minutes on file in the City Clerk's office. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). APPROVAL, OF MINUTES* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve the minutes of the regul ar Counci 1 meet ng held March 25, 1985. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). PNRK COMMISSION COMMENTS N; ,-'gVNBF.RG MI'MORIAL PARK DRAFT RF'"ORT Barb Peterson was present from the Park Commission. Peterson reviewed with the Council the draft report submitted for the Noerenberg Memorial Park. Peterson noted that this is not the final report. Planning Commission Chairman Callahan asked if Hennepin County would be required to go through the City's process of seeking conditional use permits. Mayor Butler stated that the application will be sent to Planning Commission first ind then on to Council for their review. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT Jo Ellen Hurr was not present and there was no Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Report. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Planning Commission Representative Taylor had no comments. PUBLIC COMMENTS Jim Dunn, Chaska Marina, was present. Dunn felt the need to discuss with the Council the lack of communication that has occurred between the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) and Chaska Marina. Dunn stated that Chaska has tried often to discuss options with the LMCD but that the director, Frank Mixa, is not open to suggestions. Dunn submitted to the Council a copy of the 1981 survey of docks and the 1985 survey of docks ( such surveys tc be kept on f i le in the Chaska Marina file). MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRII. 8, 1985. PAGE: 2 PUBLIC COMMENTS Dunn noted that the 1985 plan is much better for the neighbors (cont.) and the neighbors prefer the 1985 plan. Dunn noted that the LMCD director, Frank Mixa, insists that the 1981 dock plan is better. Councilmember Frahm moved, Mayor Butler seconded, to direct staff to contact Jo Ellen Hurr and have her set up an appointment to meet with Chaska Marina operators and Frank Mixa and LeFevre and try to establish communication between LMCD and Chaska Marina. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). #860 FUNK/ROGOSHESKE 540 OLD CRYSTAL 3AY ROAD FINAL SUBDIVISIOII RESOL►TTION #1743 George Funk and Judy Rogosheske were present. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that Rogosheske has submitted a letter in regard to their intent to join the Homeowner's Association that is involved in the upkeep of the piivate road White Oak Circle. Mabusth stated that the legal descriptions cannot be created until Council gi,:es final approval, therefore they cannot join the Homeowner's Association until the legal descriptions are submitted. Mabusth stated that this letter confirms the homeowners of White Oak Circle and applicants have resolved their problom with the covenants of the homeowner's association. Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember T. Adams moved, to approve Resolution 01743, A resolution approving the plat of White Oak Overlook. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). #876 RANDY ASPLUND 3424-3444 EASTLAKE STREET VARIANCE Randy Asplund was present. Asplund presented pictures to the Council showing what type of fence he is proposing. Mayor Butler explained that the ordinance only allows a 6' fence along major thoroughfares and that Eastlake Street is not a major thoroughfare. Butler stated that she could not find any hardships to grant the variance. Randy Asplund stated that his only hardship is for privacy. Asplund noted that the homes that were built are between $250-300,0000 homes and would like to seclude them from view. Asplund noted that all the neighbors were in favor and no view will be blocked. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that the neighbors that did attend the meet ing were f rom Bayside Road, not Eastlake Street. Councilmember L. Adams noted that he cannot find sufficient hardships to grant the variance for the fence. Adams felt that to request a variance to seclude the home with a fence from the surrounding homes because it does not fit in the neighboring homes is nrdt justification for approval of the variance. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD APRIL 8, 1985. PAGE; #b76 ASPLUND Councilmember Frahm stated that he too has not seer, a (cont.) hardship demonstrated by the applicant. Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to deny the variance f inding that no hardships have been demonstrated by the applicant, anO further directed staff to draft a resolution of denial with the appropriate findings. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). Mayor Butler addressed the second half of the application which involves an after -the -fact variance. Butler noted that patios were placed within the 75' lakeshore setback zone without permits or approval from the City. Randy Asplund stated that he was not aware of the hardcover regulations. Asplund stated that he doesn't want to remove the patios that cost approximately $4,500. Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to deny the after -the -fact variance for the patios, wi th such patios to be removed in 30 days, and further directed staff to draft the appropriate denial resolution based on the lack of hardship from the applicant. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). #894 T.M. CROSBY 745 SPRING HILL ROAD FINAI, SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #1744 T.M.Crosby was not present. r..�,sistantZoning Administrator Gaffron explained the proposal of the applicant to rearrange the lot lines which will result in the separation of the existing "main" house from the "caretaker" house. Gaffron noted that the "main" house will have approximately 24 acres and the "caretaker" house approximately 26 acres. Councilmember T.Adams moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to approve Resolution #1744, A Resolution approving a metes and bounds Class 1 subdivision for Thomas Crosby. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). #896 JAMES ANDERSON 2300 FOX STREET PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION James Anderson was present. Assistant Zoning Adminis- trator Gaffron reviewed with the Council the applicant's proposal. Gaffron noted the applicant is requesting a two lot subdivision of a vacant parcel north of Fox Street. Gaffron stated that the applicant's intent is to provide a shared driveway. James Anderson confirmed that his intent is to provide a shared driveway. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING f'ELD APRIL 8, 1.985. PAGE 4 #896 ANDERSON Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to (coat.) grant preliminary subdivision appr.o-ial finding that single family residences can be constructed on each lot meeting all the setback requirements of the RR-lB zoning district subject to the following conditions: 1. Drainage and utility easements. 2. $200 park fee for each new lot (less $250 credit from previous subdivision). 3. Access location to be 50' east of center dividing line as per Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson's suggestions. 4. Shared driveway. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). #898 LEROY KOEHNEN 3360 SHORELINE DRIVE VARIANCE COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW RESOLUTION #1745 Leroy Koehnen was present. Bu4lding & Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the applicant seeks a setback variance to locate a canopy. Mabusth explained that to move the caiiopy to meet the required setback would create a traffic hazard. Mabusth noted that the applicant also wishes to install a car wash. Councilmember T. Adams asked if there would be extra signage as a result of the car wash use. Leroy Koehnen stated that additional signage would not be needed except directional signs to keep the traffic flowing in the right direction. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the SAC charge for the car wash service will be $10,620 and must be paid with the building permit. Mabusth stated that a regular inspection program for underground gasoline tanks should be established by the City by amending the municipal fire codes to require such inspections. Mabusth advised that the State was considering an amendment that would require five year inspections, ;-)ut one cannot be certain this would pass. Mabusth statec' that marinas should also have their underground tangs inspected. Council agreed that some sort of inspection progi. am should be established to require regula:: inspections of underground gas and fuel tanks. Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to approve Resolution 01745, A Resolution Granting a Variance to permit the construction jf a canopy structure over an existing gasoline pump island that will be located 26' from the right of way and to approve the commercial site plan submitted by Koehiien for install +tion of fuel tanksubject. to the following: MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 8, 1985. PAGE 5 #898 KOEHNEN 1. City must approve setback variance for canopy structure (cont.) finding its placement not detrimental to the public safety. 2. New tanks installed per standards by Municipal State Fire Code. 3. Payment of $?.0,620 for total SAC and sewer unit payments with permit for installation of car_ wash. 4. Traf f is f low signage provided on site upon completion of car wash. 5. Field tanks and lines must be inspected per approved City wide inspection schedule. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). #900 JAMES OGLAND BIG ISLAND RECORD LOT #38 VARIANCE RESOLUTION James Ogland was present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that this is an after -the -tact variance for a deck and storage shed that were placed within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone. Gaffron noted that the applicant did complete his automatic variance forms and returned them to the City for processing. Gaffron explained that the application was held up because of the violation.. Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember T. Adams seconded, to approve the after -the -fact variance based on the following findings: 1. Steep slopes and the uneven, sometimes slippery shoreline terrace make access to the property difficult if not hazardous. 2. The lake access is the only viable access to the property, and in this case the decking appears reasonable to provide a safe access. 3. The 7' x 8' storage building acts as a lock box for storage of boating incidentals (pad,?les, lifejackets, etc) which reasonably should not have to be rarried up the hill after each use. Before the motion was voted upon, Council continued discussion. Councilmember Frahm felt that the deck was acceptable but that the storage shed should not be allowed just to serve convenience so the applicant doesn't have to c. incidentals. Frahm noted that everyone else on Big Isla or- the lakeshore areas in Orono wi 11 want to have a shed 1. x this one. Frahm felt that this would be precedent setting t� allow the shed to remain within the 0-75' setback.. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII. MEETING HELD APRIL R. 1985. PAGE 6 #900 JAM.ES OGLAND (cont.) Mayor Butler asked Ogland if there were footings for the shed. James Ogland stated that the shed does not have footings but merely sits on the ground. Ogland noted that Big Island is for recreational use and that the topography of his land makes it very difficult to carry items up and down the hill. Councilmember L. Adams agreed with Councilmember Frahm regarding the shed. Adams felt that the storage shed should only be allowed to remain until the seasonal principal dwelling is built and then it should be removed. Councilmember Grabek stated that convenience should not be recognized by the City as a hardship. Grabek felt that the City would be opening tr . doors for everyone in Orono if they were to qrant a variance for convenience only. Grabek felt the deck was acceptable because of the steep shore and that the deck should not create any ecological problem. Grabek agreed that the shed should remain until the principal dwelling is constructed and then it should be moved out of the 0-75' setback zone. Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to approve the after -the -fact variance for James Ogland based on the following findings: 1. Steep slopes and the uneven, sometimes slippery shoreline terrace make access to the property difficult if not Lazardous. 2. The lake access is the only viable access to the property, and in this case the decking appears reasonable to provide a safe access. Such approval is subject to t,.- following conditions: 1. Shed to be removed after the certificate of occupancy for the pr�nc•ipal residence has been issued and is to be moved outside the 0-75' setback area. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (1). Councilmember Frahm voted nay. Mayor Butler addressed the issue of the automatic lot area variance. Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to conceptually approve the automatic lot area variance and directed staff to revise the resolution and resul3mit it to Council for action. Motion, Ayes (5). Nays (0). MINIT.'5 OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 8, 1985. PAGE 7 #901 KARL JOHNSON 3393 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD VARIANCE Mr. and Mrs. Karl Johnson were present. The following were also present for this issue: Bonnie Russell of 2275 Crystal Bay Road Jay 6 Beverly Keiser of 3375 Crystal Bay Road Aline Ogland of 3345 Crystal Bay Road Jack Kust of 3355 Crystal Bay Road Greg Long of 3359 Crystal Ras, Road Dick & Donna Carl of 3385 Crystal Bay Road Richard Siakel of 3325 Crystal Ray Road. Dixie Lee Weeks of 3329 Crystal Bay Road Dick Cherba of 1340 Vine Place James Grady of 4937 Brunswick --Mound (former owner of Dick Carl's home) V. Olmstead of 4363 Wilshire Blvd --Mound Mayor Butler read the petition dated January 5, 1985, submitted at the Planning Commission asking for support and enforcement of ordinances dealing with hardcover and storage. Butler read a lette> submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Rex Ressler relating to the signed petition withdrawing their names from the petition (attached to these minutes as Exhibit A). Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed with the Council a sketch plan completed by staff showing the parking area and the retaining wall. Mabusth stated that the boat stored on the property is approximately 25 feet in length and is located less than 10' from the property line. Mabusth explained that the ordinances require if a boat is less than 20' , the owner has the right to store the boat in the rear yard 10'from the property line. Mabusth reviewed the discussion held at the Planning C.)tnmission meeting regarding the storage of boats. Mabusth explained that if a boat is over 20' in length and is properly screened from neighbor's view and meets setbacks for accessory structures, that the Council felt that this was meeting the intent of the ordin, nce. Mabusth stated that the problem here is the boat stored on the property is 25' in length stored less than 10' from the property line and clearly in view of the abutting neighbor. Mabusth stated that she and Building Inspector. Jacobs measured from the shoreline to the retaining wall, and found the regaining wall was not Located in the 0-75' setback area rut the side extension of the wall was in the 0-75' setback area. Mabusth stated that Johnson was advised by staff to erect a retaining wall to prevent the erosrun that was tzk:ng place on the property in 1982. Karl .Tch►ison stated that the bank was never landscaped properly and he has always had cr(;sion problems. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELL) APRIL 8, 1985. PAGE 8 #901 JOHNSON Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that another question (cont.) arose during the Planting Commission's review as to whether there was an old driveway to the house to the (west ) was gravel bed. Jerry Wheeler of 3399 Crystal Bay Road explained that this was clay soil except under Johnson's boat. Wheeler st-�ted that he measured the area yesterday after the snow and ice went out and the entire retaining wall i s within the 0-75' setback area. Councilmember L. Adams asked the staff to review the instructions given by staff to build the retaining wall. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that in 1982 staff found filling taking place along the lakeshore of Mr. Johnson's property. Mabusth stated that staff placed a stop work o-der and then discovered where the fill was coming from which wa. from the lakeshore bank to the west side. Mabusth noted than Johnson was told to place hay bales along the shoreline and rip rapping. Karl Johnson stated that he came home one day and the City had done the rip rapping. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that at that time staff advised Johnson that he should erect a retainina wall to prevent further erosion. Mabusth asked Johnson if staff cor.:mented on the graveled area. Karl Johnson stated that the area was gravel and that it was gravel before he purchased his home. Johnson stated that he squared up the area where the parking spot already was. Johnson introduced James Grady and presented a letter. from Mr. Grady explaining facts regarding the graveled areas. Johnson explained that James Grady lived in Dick Carl's home and can testify to the fact that the gravel area was there prior to purchasing the home. Mayor Butler read James Grady's letter (attached to these minutes as Exhibit B). James Grady of 4937 Brunswick Road confirmed the fact that the graveled parking area was there prior to Johnson movi nq in. Mayor Butler ncted that the Council recently denied a variance to park an oversized boat for Richard Eller and asked him to move the bce.t by May 1 . 1985. Butler asked what Johnson plans to do with the boat next year. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII. MEETING HELD APRII. 8, 1985. PAGE 9 #901 JOI?NSON Karl Johnson explained that his wife and he have discussed (cont.; this to a great extent and have decided that they wi I 1 move the boat elsewhere next year. Johnson explained the reason that they are going to do this is because of the violent behavior of Mr. Wheeler with attempts at intimidation, including slanderous yard signs, inaccurate letters to local newspapers, and harrassing mail and bodily injury threats to him and his immediate neighbors, which resulted in the police being called and which has dictated that he drop his boat parking variance. Mayor Butler asked if Johnson is formally withdrawing his variance application and asking the Council to not take ac+-ioi< .)n the boat. Karl Johnson explained that if they were to win this they don't know %,.nat would happen ar.d feared what would happen. Johnson noted that they are trying to end this and quiet the neighborhood down as this matter has gore too far. Johnson confirmed that he is withdrawing his variance to park the boat. Mayor Butler stated that the :)oat should be moved by May 1, 1985. Councilmember Frahm advised staff that staff shoulrt notify the Council promptly if the boat is parked there next year. Frahm had no problem with the retaining wall as it performs a function of preventing further erosion. Councilmember Grabek asked if the boat :.as not moved by May 1, 1985, what would happen if it was not moved. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that staff would issue a citation if the boat was not moved by May 1. Mabusth confirmed that staff would issue a citation also next year if the boat is ever parked there again, and report to Council. Councilmember T. Adams agreed with Frahm and felt the retaining wall should be allowed to stay since it serves as an important function in preventing erosion. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted the Planning Commission's recommendation to remove all the gravel that was placed within the 0-75' setback area and to place suitable ground cover over that area. Mabusth stated that since the property has an excess of 6 percent of hardcover in the 75-250' setback area, Planning Commission asked that that portion of the graveled area also be removed. Mabusth noted that no base is under the graveled area under the boat. Karl Johnson stated that the graveled area used to extend to the stairs on Wheelers property. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 8, 1985. PAGE 10 #901 JOHNSON James .Grady of 4937 Brunswick Road (former owner of Dick (cant.) Carl's home at 3385 Crystal Bay Road) confirmed that the gravel area did extend to the stairs. Councilmember Grabek noted that the area is blacktop no-4 and the car parking is right on the lot line. Jerry Wheeler of 3399 Crystal Bay Road submitted his own scaled drawing of the graveled areas and his o%%n ideas on where Johnson should park. Karl Johnson explained that where Wheeler wants the truck parked is an impossible location in the winter time because of the topography of the land. Mayor Butler noted that the Planning Commission did n t take into consideration the topography of the land and the very obvious hardship that runs with the land. Butler noted that the City cannot mandate a location for the truck if it is not safe. Councilmember L. Adams felt that the Planning Commission's point was that people should nct expand hardcover within 0- 75' of the Lakeshore without going to the City first. Adams felt that in light of the new evidence submitted by James Grady confj rming that there was a parking spot there before Johnson moved in, that the City shouldn't require all removal of hardcover. Adams felt that the retaining wall serves a purpose and should be allowed to remain. Adams felt that half of the hardcover should be removed and grass put in. Mayor Butler felt -hat the area under the boat should be grassed or landscaped. Councilmember Frahm stated that the 10' side lot line setback should be enforced. Frahm felt that a compromise could he made and that he would be willing to allow 6' out of the 14' or a 2' variance. Frahm noted that it would be 4' gravel. and 10' green. Councilmember T. Adams felt that the 10' side setback snould be respected. Adar,:s felt that the 2' variance may not be enough to safely park the truck. Adams stated that the upper part of the property should be non -hardcover. Councilmember Grabek agreed that because of the slope the City should compromise. Councilmember L. Adams felt that a 4' strip of gravel would not be enough to safely park the truck. Karl Johnson stated that in the winter it will create an unsaf.� problem. MINUTES OF THE. REGULAR OR(-.40 COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 8, 1985. PACE 11 #901 JOHNSON Councilmember L. AdemC moved, Councilmember Gra`)ek seconded, to deny the after -the -fact hardcover variance application by :tarl Johnson all- Crystal Bay Road based or► the followinC findings: 1. Evidence has been submitted by James Grady confirming that a parking area did exist on the Johnson property prior to Johnson's occupancy in the south, reasonably northwest corner. 2. The gravel as placed and used is considered as expanded hardcover. 3. Applicant placed hardcover within protected area without required variances. Recommendation for denial is subject to the following conditions: 1. The south one-half of all gravel hardcover within the 0- 75' area must be removed and placed with suitable ground cover (grass, etc). 2. Eight foot wide gravel parking area be allowed adjacent to the driveway with a f foot wide green area between the driveway and the lot line. 3. Any green cover to be added must be approved by Orono staff prior to installation. To further recommend approval of the after -the -fact hardcover variance of 6 square feet created by the extension of the retaining wall within the 0-75' setback area based on the following findings: 1. The major portion of the retaining wall is out of the 0- 75' setback area. 2. The retaining wall serves to control erosion. 3. Applicant was advised to erect retaining wall to sustain eroding bank in 1982 by Orono staff. To further recommend that the boat be moved by May 1, 1985, and if not moved the staff Is to issue a citation and legal action commenced. Before c.he vote was taken on the motion, discussion was opened to the public that attended. Dick Carl of 3385 Crystal. Bay Road did note that the steep slope in this area has put two cars in the lake and asked Council to consider the topography of the land. MINUTES O: THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 8, 1985. PAGE 12 #901 J0`1'NSON Jerry Wheeler of 3399 Crystal Bay Road noted that he was going (cont.) to offer a compromise but the Council has decided what they are going to do. Wheeler noted that two years ago, Mr. Johnsen came over to his home telling him that his wife was quite upset over the argument he and Johnson had had and that he would compromise if he could pull his truck all the way inside up to where the retaining wall was at and he would move his boat. Wheeler stated that he agreed to that. Wheelei stated that. Johnson changed his mind a day late-. Wheeler stated that if Johnson wishes to pull hls beat to the retaining wall Brea and truck and keep it gravel right up to the lot line, but in some manner put some sodding closer to the street, he would agree to that. Mayor Butler stated that in the motion it requires green area ur,derneath the boat along with a 6' wide area. Counci lmember Grabek asked Johnson if it was more convenient with Wheeler's suggestion. Karl Johns.,r stated that he prefers the first proposal with the motic.r, Councilmember Adams made. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). BOAT STORAGE ORDINANCE DISCUSSION The neighbors asked the Council to address the petitions that were signed by many rr- 4 dents to change or amend of abolish the boat storage ordi:unce. Dick Carl of 3385 Crystal Bay Poa6 asked about the status of the petitions that were sent to the 'ity regarding the changing of the boat ordinance. Mayo Butler stated that discussion has L-en held on the amenuing of the boat storage ordinance. Butler felt that the some of thr Council felt that the ordinance should stay the same. Dick Carl of 3385 Crystal Bay Road e..cplained that the problem here tonight: seems to indicate that there will be problems in the future. Carl stated that if the City has an ordinance where the majority of the people cannot comply with the ordinance it seem unrealistic to keep that ordinance on the books. Carl stated that half the people in Orono violate this noat storage ordinance. Carl noted that the ordinance also states "all mohile materials and equipment". Carl asked if this includes snowmobiles, cars, trucks, docks, etc:. Carl stated if you have a beat and park it in your yard, chances are you are going to violate the latter of the ordinance. Mayor Butler noted that the ordinance states t-icats over 20'. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO UNCIL MEETING HELD APRII, 8, 1985. PAGE 13 BOAT STORAGE ORDINANCE DISCUSSION Dick Carl stated that it does not define boats over 20' but says boats "less than 20'". Carl stated that the Council would be better served while they maintain a somewhat loose ordinance, that the ordinance be better defined. Rich Siakel of 3325 Crystal Bay Road noted that the ordinance seems to be vague regarding storage of equipment. Siakel asked if docks fall under this catego-y, and if so, there will be and are many violators of the ordinance. Siakel stated that equipment is not defined and Oraw the line. Siakel stated that random enforcement becomes the problem. Councilmc-mber Grabek asked if they want to draw the line. Grabek felt that if the City leaves the ordinance vague that it leaves the Council the flexibility they need to resolve issues such as this. Grabek noted that the City could enforce every ordinance it has, but the property taxes would rise about 100 percent because the City would have to hire three t=mes the staff they have now. Mayor Butler agreed that by leaving the ordinance vague it gives the City Council the flexibilityfor interpretation of the ordinance and open to thr feelings of the neighbors. Greg Long of 3359 Crystal Bay Road explained that the ordinance does not address the seasonal storage of equipment. Long stated that half the things stored on someone's property in the winter is not stored there in the summer because it is in the lake during the summer. Long felt tFe ordinance should be amended to include seasonal storage. Councilmember L. Adams agreed that the ordinance should be emended for clarity in certain areas. Adams felt that a pi,blic hearing should be held for consideration of modifying `:ie boat storage ordinance. Adams noted that the boats seem to get larger and increase in number every year. Mayor Butler explained that the Council asked for Planning Commission's interpretation of the ordinance. Butler stated that they resolved that if a boat is properly screened from neighbor's view it should meet the ordinance. Dick Carl of 3385 Crystal Bay Road explained that the design of modern boats are made so .at t may be stored on the owner's prcperty. Carl stated t, this has been done because the public has demandea it, and because it gets expensive when the owner of a boat has to store it at a marina. Dick Cherba of 1340 Vine Place asked the Council to remember that the Lake Minnetonka area is a recreational area. Cherba stated that when someone lives in a recreational area the City should realize that storage of recreational equipment on the owner's property is inevitable. Cherba felt that this was only the beginning of the problem for boat storage and seasonal equipment. MINUTES OF THE' REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 8, 1985. PAGE 14 A letter submitted by Dick Carl was given to the Council regarding a specific improvement on- -)perty located at 3399 Crystal Bay Road (attached to these minutes as Exhibit C ) . Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that staff would contact the individual the letter involves and staff would report back to Council. STATUS OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 130 CYGNET PLACE Councilmember L. Adams asked why the City should grant the extension and the status of the clean-up of the property. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the extension is asked by staff to allow the owner more time to clean-up in light of the fact of the winter storms that held up the clean- up. Mabusth stated that they have shown some progress in the clean-up. Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to extend the deadline for clean-up of the violations at 130 Cygnet Place to May 1, 1985. Motion, Ayes ( 5) , Nays ( 0) . BIG ISLAND VETERAN'S CAMP Mayor Butler noted that she has talked w.it.h John Burger on the telephone regarding the status of the Big Island Veteran's Camp. Butler noted that Burger's next idea was to have tent camping and open fires rather than use the buildings. Butler explained to Burger that without police and fire protection it would impossible for the City to grant such a request, and that the camp must be brought up to meet state fire and building codes. Building Inspector Jacobs explained that he testified at the State Legislature sub -committee regarding the building and fire code violations at the Pig Island Veteran's Camp. Jacobs also presented to the sub -committee the City's position regarding the camp use. Jacobs noted that after working with the camp managers last summer fr) qet the corrections completed and nothing was done, Jacobs felt ,`_f+at hazardous building procedures should com!nence. Council concensus was that the Big Island Camp should not open until the violations have been corrected and the Camp meets state fire and building codes. Councilmember Frahm moved, Mayor Butler seconded, to start hazardous building procedures based on the evidence the Council has had in the past of the flagrant building and fire code violations at the Big Island Veteran's Camp, and directed staff to write a letter to the Veteran's Camp notifying them of such action. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 8, 1985. PAGE 15 ANOTHER POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS BUILDING Councilmember L. Adams asked staff to check on a cottage on Crystal Bay Road which appears to be a potential hazardous building and have staff report back to Council. REVIEW OF SITE PLAN & BUILDING PLANS OF PROPOSED SANCTUARY FOR CALVARY MEMORIAL CHURCH ---INFO ITEM Mayor Butler moved, Councilmermher. L. Adams seconded, to approve the site plan and building plans of the proposed sanctuary for. Calvary Memorial Church. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). CABLE TV REPORT Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to recognize that a Cable TV meeting would be held at the Shorewood City offices at 7:00 p.m. at April 9, 1985. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). APPEARANCE JOHN SHARDLOW John Shardlow was present to discuss possible contract with the City to act as a consultant . Shardlow stated that what he knows about what the City warts is the City is interested in looking at the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code as it affects the Highway 12 corridor. Mayor Butler stated that the Council recently had a proposal by a businessman to relocate his landscape business on Highway 12. Butler explained that his appearance made the City take a look at the future development of Highway 12. Butler noted that the Maple Plain interceptor will run along Highway 12 and also Highway 12 itself will be upgraded and therefore create more traffic. Butler stated that the City would like to come up with something that addresses the City's intent for traffic and planning. Councilmember T. Adams stated that historically t:;e City felt a need for a type of commercial zoning for uses that don't require hookups to sewer, such as a nursery/ landscaping business. Adams stated that. the City is looking for a land use that will be consistent with the City's historical planning objectives. Mayor Butler stated that when the Maple Plain interceptor permit was released it stated that no existing "residential" facilities would be allowed to hookup. Butler noted that permit left the door open for commercial uses and new residential to hookup by petitioning the Metro Waste Control Commission. Councilmember Frahm stated that the interceptor will be there but the City wishes to protect the Comprehensive Plan. Frahm stated that Highway 12 is zoned residential but that zoning is not very realistic. Frahm noted that the City does not want industrial zoning along Highway 12 either, but would like to see a quasi -commercial use that fits within the City's intent ar ] Compreh ns ' ve Plan. Frahm felt the City should be prepared fU t ie future. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 8, 1985. PAGE 16 Councilmember T. Adams stated that the nursery/landscape business is a classic example to use for that type of quasi - commercial use. Councilmember Grabek felt that any planning should include the fact that I-394 will be Highway 17 in the future. John Shardlow stated that he has much of the information o;. the I-394 project and could include that in any planning he does. Shardlow stated that he will prepare a draft proposal and bring it back to Council for their consideration. RESOLUTION 11746 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to adopt Resolution #1746, A Resolution approving proposed program for Year XI Urban Hennepin County Community Development PlcckGrant Funds and authorizing its submittal. Motion, Ayes (5)► Nays (0). KNT UTILITY TRACTOR DE MOUNT MOWER* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve the payment in the amount of $19, 280. 82 to K-)rtuem Sales and Service for a utility tractor and side -mount » Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). REQUEST FOR FUNDS WESTONKA SENIOR CITIZENS Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to commit the funds for the Westonka Senj*or Citizens. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). FINANCING CRYSTAL BAY IMPROVEMENTS Finance Director Kuehn reviewed with the Council the financing for the proposed Crystal Bay improvements. PROPERTY FOR SALE LOT 7, BLOCK 6 NAVARRE HEIGHTS Public Works Coordinator Gerhardso�iexplained that there is property for sale (Lot 7, Block 6, N3varre Heights) which is adjacent to L��e Fav6:re parking lot at the west end. Gerhardson stated that if the City was to acquire the lot and certain improvements were made, it would be easier to maintain parts of the parking log. Councilmember Grabek moved, Councilmember Frahm second to direct staf f to see if the owner will donate the land to Orono Park Commission. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 8, 1985. PAGE 17 JENTILUCCI DRAINAGE TILE Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson suggested that the City clean-up the drainage tile on a one-time basis. Mayor Butler suggested a written contract. Butler stated that staff should ,nake it clear to the Jentilucci's that in trade for the easement the City will clean out that ditch only once and will not maintain it in the future. Councilmember Frahm moved, Mayor Butler seconded, to direct staff to clean out the ditch on a one-time basis in exchange for the easement on the City road and that the City will not maintain the ditch at any other time in the future but wi 11 be the responsibility of the owner. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). EASEMENT NEEDED FOR CRYSTAL BAY SEWER Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson stated that Dick Stinson is opposed to the City acquiring an easement across his land and Gerhardson suggested to alter the sewer line so the line will not cross his land. Gerhardson stated that the alternate location of the line will cost approximately $7,000 more but that Stinson has stated that the City will have to condemn his easement. Councilmember Frahm moved, Mayor Butler seconded, to approve the alternate sewer line location to avoid Stinson's property. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). ART CENTER SANITARY SEWER City Attorney Radio reported to the Council that to include the Art Center in the Crystal Bay Sewer project would require that the City start the whole procedure over. Radio did note that if there is some cost that has not been assessed against the whole project and it abutts the project, the City can hold a supplementary proceeding in which you assess part of the cost back to the Art Center. Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to direct staff to start the procedure to serve the Art Center with sanitary sewer. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). Ma}. r Butler stated about the only thing that needs to be done to include the Art Center is to amend the feasibility study and hold a public hearing. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD API:1L 8, 1985. PAGE 18 LICENSES* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve the following licenses: Septic License - Elmer Peterson Septic License - Sullivan's Service Septic License - Volkenant & Sons Parades & Special Events Permit - Hawg Hookers Bassmasters of MN Beer License - Orono Golf Course Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). BILLS* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, that the All Funds Accounts and Liquor Store Accounts be paid. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). ADJOURNMENT 10:45 PM Councilmember Frahm moved, Mayor But ler seconded, to adjourn the regular Council meeting at 10:45 p m. Motion, Ayes (5), w.n u c t n i Mary C. B t er, Mayor f (' C'. i i � � cc i.' C .� n c.. � i • ; r �� . `! tJ f . � '� 9� � vai i C1.� C� Rlr. C Qirn . 3(rx (5. 3 rnn I rr 3G33 Norfll wllnrr iriur :Dagiiaia, Qlinnrnnfa 553n1 April S, 1985 City of Orono 1335 South Brown Road Orono, Minnesota 55323 We, the undersigned, wish to withdraw our names from the pet- ition we signed which was circulated by Mr. Gary Wheeler re- garding the Carl Johnson 1901 variance. We feel Mr 'heeler did not completely represent all of the ramifications of the ordinance when he asked us to sign the petition. and therefore cannot lend our names to its endorse- ment. Rex G. Ressler Sharon M. Ressler i TO: Orono Citv Council FROM: James R. Grady DATE: April 8, 1985 RE: 3393 Crystal Bay Road, Orono, MN: Parking Area and Hardcover History My name is Jim Grady. My current residence is in Mound, where my wife Gayle and myself have owned our home since Novmeber, 1967. However, from Janu- ary, 1960, through October, 1967, my family and I lived at 3385 Crystal Bay Road, Orono. We rented the property. The property immediately ad- joining to the west (3399 Crystal Bay Road) was at that time owned and occupied by Mr. Scott Whitnah. Subsequent to my departure as a renter of the house at 3385, sometime in the 1970's, Mr. Whitnah sold the easterly 50 foot parcel of his property to Mr. and Mrs. Phil Gross, who built the home that Mr. and Mrs. Karl Johnson now own and reside at. This property became 3393 Crystal Bay Road. Because of my long-term proximity to these properties, I am very familiar with the parking and hardcover history that prevailed on the Whitnah property. While I lived at 3385, the Whitnah property (at 3399) had a framed -wood stairway that ran uphill towards the east side of his house from in front of. (south end) and along the west side of his parking area. After the Gross house was built, the stairway remained,only now it began at approxi- mately along the north -south property line dividing Whitnah property from Gross property. Prior to selling the property to Gross, Whitnah had used at least 1/2 of the front part of that property for his parking area. After selling, the property, he used the area in front of the staircase (north of the staircase) that remained on his property. From time to time, Mr. Whitnah had driveway rock brought in to cover his parking area, be- fore and after selling to Gross. The sketch below is my recall of the above discussion. �✓oW_79 pa+e16'^/6 A -seen► 3�7 � 3385 cA¢ 4- A"Ige-&77 Pla TE : -Tiis Pw f JoT - lb 5cAt�e r L"r � , .. r To: Jeanne A. Mabusth. From: Charles R. Carl Date: April 5 1985. i' l� 1' 1 CITY OF ORONO Subject: 10' Fire Lane along property at 31399 Crystal Bay Rd. Dear Jeanne; During a recent meeting involving Crystal Bay Rd. res'ldents,l had the opportunity to examine a plat reap of the area. I noticed a 10' public access running along the west Fide of the above stated property. Upon physical examination of that property line it appears that a graveled parking area alongside the west side of the existing garage overlaps well into the public area. Also having been an interested observer during Lhe variance hearings for this property it seems to me that part of the final variance was the requirement for elimination of all hard cover along the west side of the new structure. I spoke with a former member of the Planning Commission who was, at that time, an active member of the commission. This person also remembers something similar. In view of all the pressure presently being put on one resident nextdoor about hardcover would you please check your records and advise. Respectfully oc �`-- Dick, Carl AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET f"UR MONDAY, APRIL 8, 1985, 7:00 P.M. (*) Asterisk items are considered to be xeutine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon requc6t. ROLL CALL 1. C-NSENT AGENDA* APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 2. Regular Meeting of March 25, 1985 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS 3. Draft Report - Noerenberg Memorial Park LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Representative Paul Taylor PUBLIC COMMENTS ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 4. #860 Hunk/Rogosheske, 540 Old Crystal Bay Road - Final Subdivision - Resolution 5. #876 Randy Asp!und, 3424-3444 Eastlake Street - Variance 6. #894 T. M. Crosby, 745 Sur*.ng Hill Road - Final Subdivision - Resolution 7. #896 James N. Anderson, 2300 Fox Street - Preliminary Subdivision 8. #898 Leroy Koehnen, 3360 Shoreline Drive - Variance - Commercial Site Plan Review - Resolution 9. #900 James W. Ogland, Big Island Record Lot #38 - Variance - Resolution 10. #901 Karl F. Johnson, 3393 Crystal Bay Road - Variance *11. Status of Property Located at 130 Cygnet Place *12. Big Island Veteran's Camp *13. Information Item - Review of Site Plan and Building Plans of Proposed Sanctuary for Calvary Memorial Church CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT MAYOR'S REPORT CABLE TV REPORT *14. Meeting - April 9, 1985, Shorewood City Office, 7:00 P.M. TRANSPORTATION REPORT CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 15. 7:30 P.M. Appearance - John Shardlow *16. Community Development Block Grant Program Funds Expenditure - Resolution *17. Payment Utility Tractor and Side Mount Mower 18, Request for Funds - Westonka Senior Citizens, Inc. 19. Financing Crystal Bay Improvements 20. Property for Sale - Lot 7, glock 6, Navarre Heights AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, APRIL 8, 1985, 7:90 P.M. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S LETTERS AND MEMOS CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 21. Art Center - Sanitary Sewer LICENSES (22*) BILLS (23*) ADJOURNMENT MON MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 25, 1985. 61g85 ATTENDANCE 7 : 12 PM The Orono Counci I met on the above date w(ph thtF ng members present: Mayor Butler, Councilmembers r.a k, Frahm, and Lynn Adams. Counci lmember Tim Adams was absent . City Attorney Radio and City Engineer Cook were also present. ',tie following represented the City staff : Public Works •-dinator Gerhardson, Deputy City Clerk Lattin, Finance _rector Kuehn, Assistant Zoning Administratc: Gaffian, Building Official Jacobs, Police Chief Kilbo, an6 "i'.y Recorder Sutton. Nancy Husnik from the City Attorney's office, Popham, Haik, etc, was also present. Mayor Butler left the meeting at 7:56 p.m. and Councilmember Frahm continued the meeting as Acting Mayor. PUBLIC HEARING 7:13-7:20 PM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Larry Blackstad, Office of Planning & Development, Hennepin County, was present. City Recorder Sutton noted the affidavit of publication. Mayor Butler announced that now was the time and place for the p,.:i)lic hearing concerning the community development bloc% grant program Year XI. There was no one present from the audience for this public hearing. Mayor Butler noted that the City has approximately $28, cj00 in funds for Year XI. Butler explained that these funds rust be allocated in order for the City to retain these funds. Larry Blackstad, Senior ?Manner for the Block Grant Program, stated that the City must set up the administration for the program. Blackstad stated that the City has an 18 month time period for when the program is approved by HUD that an expenditure has to occur. Blackstaa stated that the money discussed tonight would become availabre to the City on July 1, 1985, and must be expended by January 1, 1987. Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to direct staff to complete the application for the funding and send to Hennepin County. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). Councilmember L. Adams stated that the priority for the funding should be used for the Crystal Bay residents for their hookups to the sewer. Larry Blackstad stated that there was a sample resolution given to the Public Works Coordinator regarding the Community Development Block Grant Program funds. Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson stated that the resolution would be on the next Council agenda. MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCII 25, 1985. PAGE 2 CONSENT AGENDA* Police Chief Kilbo asked that the Blue Bell Solicitor's License be removed from the consent agenda item 019. Mayor Butler moved, CouncilmemberFrahm seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda*, subject to item #19 being removed, with all staff reports concerning these items to be attached to an original copy of these minutes on file in the City Clerk's office. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). APPROVAL OF MINUTES* Mayor Butlermoved, Counci !member Frahm seconded, toapprove the reqular minutes of the Orono Council meeting held March 11, 1985, as submitted. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). APPEARANCE BY AL i MARGO PENKE - SOLICITORS LICENSE Al and Margo Penke were present to discuss their solicitor's license application to sell cut flowers. Al Penke stated that his current solicitor's license expires next week and he is here to renew the license. Penke stated that he learned about the complaint from Flowers by Helen through the newspapers. Penke explained that the newspaper articles made him look like the bad guy when all along he has complied with the City's ordinances. Penke stated that he did not know that he needed a temporary sign permit and will remove the signs. Penke felt that the complaint from a Spy ing Park business owner should not have any bearing on the Orono business person just because he is creating competition for the Spring Park business. Penke stated that his own competition is Tyra's market. Margo Penke stated that their business is like a European Flower Market. Penke stated that they have been doing business in Maple Plain and Cokato and have never had any complaints. Councilmember Grabek moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve the solicitor's license for Al and Margo Penke to sell cut flowers for 60 days. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). LAKE MINNETONKA CONSLRVATION DISTR.--T REPORT Jo Ellen Hurr was not present and therewas no Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Report. PLKNNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Chair -man Callah4 and Planning Commission member Rovegno were present. PUBLIC COMMENTS Police Chief Ki► asked that the Council act on a limited firearms permit. .�,lbo stated that a resident is having problems with raccoons. Kilbo stated that he just received the telephone call today. Kilbo stated that he reviewed the firearms permit and doesn't foresees any problems. MINUTES OF T11E ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 25, 1985. PAGE 3 Councilmember Frahm moved, CouncilmemberI.. Adams seconded, to approve the limited firearms permit for 15days. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). MEMO ON STATUS OF TREE REMOVAL ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3135 CASCO CIRCLE* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to accept the status memo concerning the tree removal on property located at 3135 Casco Circle written by Building Official Jacobs. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). #884 RICHARD ELLER 2655 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCE Richard Eller was present. D.C. Messer of 2673 Phet Road and E.J. Stanke of 2660 Pheasant Road were pre! Jerry Wheeler of 3399 Crystal Bay Road was also prese,.c. Acting Mayor Frahm felt that the boat should be removed by April 15, 1985. Councilmember L. Adams felt that the Council should follow the Planning Commission's recommendation to deny the variance to permit the storage of the oversized boat based on a question of the validity of the hardships claimed by Eller and that the applicant can relocate the boat. Councilmember Grabek moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to deny the varie —e to permit the storage of the oversized boat based on a stion of the validity of the hardships claimed by Ellc:. and that the applicant can relocate the boat which sits on a trailer and directs applicant to move the boat by April 15, 1985. Before a vote was taken, discussion continued. Richai:d Eller felt that April. 15 wa3 unreasonable. Eller stated that the boat is usually put in the water prior to Memorial Day or May 30. Eller stated that the boat was there last year and he didn't know his neighbors objected to the oversized boat. Eller stated that he has promised that the boat will not be parked there next year. Councilmember Grabek felt that May 1st would be a better deadline for the applicant and changed the motion to May 1st instead of April 15, 1985. D.C. Messer of 2673 Pheasant Road state .gat the applicant is dragging his feet. Messer stated tha, the boat could have been moved in November when he was notified of the violation. Acting Mayor Frahm told the neighbors that the City has had a report from a marina verifying that if the boat was moved, that it would damage the boat. MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 25, 1985. PAGE 4 Councilmember L. Adams withdrew his second since the motion was changed to include a May 1st deadline instead of April 15th. Richard Eller stated that certain things have been misconstrued in his case. Eller explained that he never knew that anyone was unhappy with his boat parked there. Eller stated that December 5th after he returned from vacation was the first he had heard of any complaint about the boat. Councilmember Grabek asked the neighbors if they ever approached Eller asking him to move the boat and informing Eller that they were unhappy with the boat parked there. E.J. Stanke of 2660 Pheasant Road stated that he never talked to Eller but called t;:e City and found out that Eller was in violation of the boat ozdinance. Stanke noted that his home is for sale and the boas is discouraging buyers. Coun 'lmember Grabek ericouraq-d the neighbors to work out their problems and approaching the neighbor first before ma:.ters like this are brought before the City Council. Richard El ler stated that to move the boat for one month would cost him a great deal of money. Councilmember Grabek moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to deny the variance to park boat and gave a deadline of May 1, 1985, for the boat to be removed, and boat never to be parked there again. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). PUBLIC HEARING 8:15-8:16 PM VACATION OF MANOR CIRCLE Acting Mayor Frahm announced that now was the time and place for the public hearing to be held concerning the vacation of Manor Circle. City Recorder Sutton noted the affidavit of publication. There was no one present in the audience for this public hearing, therefore Acting Mayor Frahm closed the public hearing at 8:16 p.m. Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to postpone the vacation of Manor Circle until the developer of Outlot A proceeds with the third stage plat, and further directs the Mayor to execute the agreement on behalf of the City. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD MARCH 25, 1985. PAGE 5 #889 EUGENE NELSON BIG ISLAND RECORD LOTS 16 AND 22 - FINAL SUBD .RESOLUTION Jay T. Smedberg was present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that the Big Island Ordinance does have some inconsistencies. Gaffron noted that Smedberg recently purchased the properties owned by Eugene Nelson. Gaffron noted that this was a division for tax purposes. Jay Smedberg asked for extra time to speculate on his options for the property in question. Councilmember L. Adams felt that the Council could act on the application and still allow time for Smedberg to speculate on his options. Counc.� ' � -mber Grabek stated that Smedberg's options are limitE,, -flyway in that the entire property, when in common ownership, can only be one record lot. Councilmember Grabek moved, Acting Mayor Frahm seconded, to table the application for 6 months to allow the applicant ample time to seek his options for the properties in question and further directed staff to amend the ordinance to eliminate errors before this item is placed on the agenda. Motion, Ayes (2), Nays (1). Councilmember L. Adams voted nay. Adams felt that the division for tax purposes could be acted on tonight. RESOLUTION #1741 ACCEPT BIDS CRYSTAL BAY SEWER PROJECT City Engineer Cook reviewed with the Council the bids received for the Crystal Bay Sewer Project. Cook noted the lowest bid was from ARI in the amount of $691,587.65. Cook noted that the City has worked with ARI and has received satisfactory work from ARI. Cook noted the resolution for Council's action in which the Council would accept the bids but not award the project. Councilmember Grabek moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve Resolution #1741, A Resolution Accepting Bids for the Crystal Pay Sewer Project but not awarding the project. Motion, Aycs (3), Nays (0). SET ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES CRYSTAL BAY SEWER PROJECT City Engineer Cook asked for Council's opinion on what information and what assessment procedure the City sho 'd notify the Crystal Bay residents and general tax payr Orono. Cook explained that if Council decided on a . assessment with front lateral charges according to lot: the following would be a per unit cost: for a 50' lot the assessment would be $7,419.20/unit MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD MARCH 25, 1985. PAGE 6 for a 100' lot the assessment would be $9,751.20/unit for a 150' lot the assessment would be $12,080.20/unit for a 200' lot the assessment would be $14,415.40/unit City Engineer Cook did note that the last few sewer projects went strictly by a unit basis or the same charge for everyone regardless of their lot size. Cook noted if the Council was to choose the per unit basis for everyone the assessment would be $10,724.94. Planning Commission member Rovegno stated that he happens to have one of the largest lots in the sewer project and doesn't feel that he should be penalized because he conforms to more of the zoning code then the others with the small lots. Rovegno noted that its the smaller lots that forced the sewer onto the area in the first place. Rovegno explained that he has ample area to expand or repair his septic system if needed. Rovegno asked that Council use the same unit basis for everyone rather than penalizing the larger lots. Rovegno felt that the Art Center should be included in the project becaase of its quasi -commercial use. The consensus of the Counci 1 was to base the assessments on a per unit basis rather than the lateral charge. Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to direct staff to include the Art Center in the project and in the public hearing if possible. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). City Attorney Radio stated that he would investigate whether the City would have to start all the hearings over again because they weren't included f rom the start of the project. Radio noted that they did receive published notice in the paper. Radio noted that he would report back to the Council. Councilmember Grabek felt the project should be assessed 100% against the Crystal Bay residents and not include the general tax payer. Councilmember L. Adams concurred with Grabek that the project should be 100% assessed, but added that the Crystal Bay residents that qualify should be allowed to apply for financial assistance through the grant program. Adams stated that the City should not exercise its right to take property from the resident that cannot pay until property is sold or the person has died. Council felt that in the notice to the general public and Crystal Bay residents that the ratio should be 50-100% assessed as the options for the Council to consider at the assessment hearing. MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCII. MEETING HELD MARC11 25, 1985. PAGE 7 Councilmember Grabek moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to direct staff to draft a notice to go the general public and Crystal Bay residents with the ratio of 50-100% assessed as being the options for the Council to consider at the assessment hearing. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). RESOLUTION #1742 ASSESSMENT HEARING APRIL 22, 1985 ORONO MIDDLE SCHOOLPublic Works Coordinator Gerhardson suggested changing the time of the assessment hearing from 7:00 to 7:30 p.m. in case the City must have a public hearing for the Art Center at which time such public hearing would be held at 7:00 p.m. Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to approve Resolution #1742, A Resolution Approving the Assessment Hearing to be held in the Orono Middle School on April 22, 1985, at 7:30 p.m. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). MAYOR'S REPORT - EMPLOYMENT OF CITY ADMINISTRATOR Cy Smythe was present. Smythe reviewed with the Council the contract to employ the new City Administrator. Councilmember Grabek moved, Councilmember I,. Adams seconded, to approve the employment contract effective May 1, 1985, with Mark Bernhardson as the new City Administrator and further directed staff to submit contract for Bernhardson's signature. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). BID AWARD SINGLE AXLE DUMP TRUCK* Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to award the bid to the Minneapolis GMC for an amount not to exceed $23,842.00 for a single axle dump truck and hydraulic sander. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). 1984 POLICE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS* Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to accept Finance Director Kuehn's memo concerning the 1984 Police Department Operations. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). YEAR-TO-DATE ESTIMATED REVENUES COMPARED TO ACTUAL REVENUES AS OF DEC 31, 1984* Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to approve Finance Director Kuehn's year-to-date estimated revenues compared to actual revenues as of December 31, 1984. Motion, 'dyes (4), Nays (0). M,INUTE'S OF TIDE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING IIELD MARCII 25, 1985. PAGI•,' 8 YEAR--TO-DA'i'E BUDGET APPROPRIATION COMPARED WITH ACTUAL EXPENDITURES AS OF DEC. 31, 1984* NON-LETHAI, WEAPON RFV I EW - POLICE DEPARTMENT Councilmember' Adams moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to approve Finance Director Kuehn's year-to-date budget appropriation compared with actual expenditures as of December 31, 1984. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). Police Chief Kilbo demonstrated the non -lethal weapon (Nova XR-5000, stun gun) and asked for Council's approval to allow the officers to carry such weapon. Kilbo stated that he has discussed the side of fects with medical experts and they have no problems with the stun gun. Kilbo stated that he also checked with the insurance company and they foresee no problem with covering such weapon. Kilbo stated that strict guidelines will be followed by officers that use the stun gun. Kilbo noted that the police department will not buy the stun guns for the officers but each individual officer wi 11 buy the stun gun if: they wish to carry one. Kilbo noted that Brooklyn Park uses the stun gun and has had no problems with it. Kilbo explained that the stun gun is used to get control over someone who is not very cooperative with the police. City Attorney Radio stressed that this non -lethal weapon is only to be used in extreme cases and when reasonable force is necessary. Radio noted that adequate training should be required of all officers that carry such weapon. Acting Mayor Frahm stated that the weapon should be used as a defensive weapon only and not as an offensive weapon. Councilmember Grabek stated that strict guidelines should be followed when the use of th4.s weapon is necessary. Police Chief Kilbo stated that ever.ytime one of these weapons are used the of f icer will be required to keep a record of the instances when the weapon is used, and the police department will report to the Council on the incident. Councilmember L. Adams moved, Acting Mayor Frahm seconded, granted the police department permission to allow its officers to purchase the Nova XR-5000 and be allowed to use weapon according to department guidelines with regular reports from the police department when such weapon is used. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCII. MEETING HELD MARCH 25, 1985 PAGE 9 SALARY 6 BENEFIT REVIEW FOR CITY EMPLOYEES CY SMYTHE Cy Smythe was present. Smythe asked for Council direction concerning the salary and benefit review for City Employees. Smythe explained that ever since the arbitration came via the police to establish longevity programs for police it was consistent with the majority of the Cities in the area. Smythe state' that the City has never cstablished a basis for which they want to pay anybody. Smythe stated that the City should make such definitive decision for two reasons: 1 ) So the employees and the Council know the basis on which they will pay employees; 2) Because the legislature passed the comparable worth act which indicates that the City has to do a jot) evaluation study and measure the market in order to make salary decisions. Smythe stated that the City should decide how they wish to pay their employees based on comparison with a relavent group of comparable Cities. Councilmember L. Adams asked if the comparable worth study has to be done with other public institutions or could comparisions he made through the private sector where there is market pressure to determ=.ne wages. Smythe stated that the comparable worth acL does not specify public or private. Smythe stated that the Council should decide what cities they would like to he compared with and then Smythe can make a recommendation based on the re-Fults of th(s study. Smythe stated that the City is currently participating in a comparable worth study with Control Data but such study results will not be available until approximately December, 1985. Smythe suggested that the City not pay City employees the same longevity as granted to the police because longevity is a method of payment which has been adjudged by arbitrators as unique to police and fire employees. Acting Mayor Frahm stated that the new City Administrator should be involved with the creation of salary policy. Smythe also noted that other cities do not offer longevity to their employees (other than police and fire). Smythe stated that the unskilled/semi-skilled public works employees are overpaid compared with the market. Smythe stated that unskilled/semi-skilled public works employee receives approximately $9-11./hr when the market dictates SF./hr. Smythe stated that the City is competitive with the private sector as far as clerical help is concerned. Smythe stated that a study could be done with 6-7 comparable cities in the western suburbs. Councilmember Grabek asked for a comparable worth study with 6-7 surrounding cities in the western suburbs for Council's information and the new City Administrator. MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARC11 25, 1985. PAGE 10 Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to direct Cy Smythe to do a comparable worth study with 6-7 surrounding cities in the western suburbs not to exceed an amount of $500, to be submitted to Council as soon as possible, and to wait until the new City Administrator comes aboard before setting up any formal policy procedures. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT City Attorney Radio stated that the City of Moundsview is asking other cities to submit a amicus curiae brief in support of their position regarding their denial of a zoning permit and asked Council's opinion on whether the City should get involved. Radio noted that amicus curiae briefs rarely help and questioned whether it would be worth the City of Orono to get involved. Radio stated that he would contact the City Attorney for Moundsview. City Attorney Radio introduced his legal assistant, Nancy Husnik, to the Council. LICENSES BLUE BELL ICE CREAM Police Chief Kilbo stated that the Blue Bell Ice Cream Company has submitted a solicitor's license application. Kilbo stated that he has no problem with the owner:;, but would like to get a list of names and telephone numbers of t ne actual people that will be soliciting within Orono. Kilbo stated that it will be college age solicitors and would like to check each one individually. Councilmember L. Adams moved, Acting Mayor Frahm seconded, to approve the Blue Bell Ice Cream Solicitor's license subject to the company submitting a list of names and telephone numbers of the actual people that will be soliciting within Orono. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). WAIVE $150 FEE Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson explained that a gentlemen wants to move an oversized boat lift and in Orono's fee schedule it requires a $150 for moving homes but does not address oversized objects such as the boat lift. Gerhardson stated that Hennepin County does require a $15 permit fee. Councilmember Grabek moved, Acting Mayor Frahm seconded, to waive the fee for moving an over -width boat lift through Orono and to honor Henepin County's permit as long as the applicant follows all regulations of Hennepin County's permit. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). LICENSES* Mayor Butler moved, Counci lmember Frahm seconded, to approve the following licenses: Earl Day i Sons - Septic License Thompson Plumbing - Septic License Patnode Bros - Septic License Minnetonka Bass Club - Parades i Special Events Permit Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING IIL LD MARCH 25, 1.985. PAGE 11 BILLS* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, that the All Funds Accounts and Liquor Store Accounts be paid. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). kDJOURNMENT 10:06 PM Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to adjourn the regular Council meeting at 10:06 p.m. and enter into executive session. Motion, F::s (3), Nays (0). ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Rttum % APR 81985 ORONO DRAFT REPORT NOERENBERG MEMORIAL PARK ADVISORY COMMITTEE MARCH 14, 1985 I. INTRODUCTION A. The Gift and Will In 19i2 the Hennepin County Park Reserve District acquired perty in the City of Orono, adjacent to Lake Minnetonka, as a gift and bequest from the late Lora N. Hoppe. Indicated in her wil were several stipulations regarding the use of the land. Included were the following: o The area shall be known as Noerenberg Memorial County Park, establishing a memorial park in memory of Frederick and Johanna Noerenberg, parents c.f A rs. Hoppe. o The land shall be operated and devoted to public park purposes as an arboretum for flowers, shrubs, ,nd trees. o The land shall riot be used for picnic purposes, for camping, ror boat o►. watercraft launching, or any uses incompatible with that of a general display garden. o The house on the property shah be demolished and a memorial arbor erected with a plaque commemorating the Noerenbergs. o The area north of County Road 51 should be operated and managed in its approximate 11 state as a place wherein wild fowl and other wild game Lc lowed to congregate on the land as a natural area. o Earnings of the funds, also given to the District, should be used for the purpose of maintenance. B. Court Order While the will specifically prohibited certain things, and explicitly directed others it also left many items to interpreta .1. In 1975 the District sought a court order interpreting and defining authorized r;ses of the funds given it by Mrs. Hoppe. The court directed: o That the Hennepin. County Park Reserve District is directed, as tr,istee, to apply the real property devised to it by said decedent to the, use of that of a general display garden as specified ' the Will of Lora N. iioppe o That the Hennepin County PariC Reserve District 7s directed, as trustee, to rnai ntai ri the ner sonal property received by it from the estate of Lora N. Hoppe in a segregated acc-unt and shall administer 'the sarre in trust upon the foi'0wing `erms and conditions: - To apply sc, much of the trust principal and/or net income therefrom as rna% Le reasonable and necessar, to develop and maintain the general disply garden as described in the Last Iti l i of for. d;ceder,t - !n the event that the trustee finds it reasonable to do so, to expand the land area devotee to such gi-ner•al d;sply garden usage by acquisition of adjoining lards by appl icalior of such portions of the principal anal/or yet income of the trust as determined by the trustee to be nc.cessary for that purpose o That the Hennepin County Park Reserve District; as trustee, in regard to said trust, is hereby rested with .full powers of asset sale, investment and retention as specified in Minnesota Statutes paragraph 501,125, enabling said trustee to properiy - 3 - administer and apply the trust assets in its possession to ;,he uses and purposes set forth herein and in the Will of Lora N. Hoppe, dated March 23, 1970. With this clarification, the District Board has, as a matter of policy, (jetermined that $1.2 O llion of the fund should b!-, retained as principal The earnings from investment will be used to finance ongoing operations of the park. C. Previ,^,is Planning In 1974., an advisory committee was established to develop a plan for this area that would be consistent with the will and make available to the public a beautiful and educational place to visit. The committee developed a concept plan, but due to various problems Ian was never i mR l t:men ted. D. The Current Advisory Comittee The present Committee was established in October of 1984 in order to complete the task of developing a plan for the park. In regard to this task, the :Committee was charged with the following responsibilities: o to advise District staff in the review of the original Master Plan for the parK. u recommend appropriate chenges in the plan and establish a long term working plan for preservation, improvement and maintenance of the Park. o to recommend appropriate funding strategies far the development of the park accordi,ig to the plan that the Committee recommends. The membership of the Committee, in order to represent the various interests associated with the park, included individuals from various - 4 - backgrounds and community interests. Committee members were selected from the following areas of interest: o Horticulture/recreation o Individuals o Friends of Mrs. Hoppe o Neighbors o City of Orono o Lak: 'Innetonka Community The committee met as a whole on several occasions to carry out their task. 'his proposal is a result of their concentrated effort and represents general consensus of what the Committee determined best for the Distric 'or the citizens of the area while consistent w;th the interpretations of Mrs. Hoppe's will. The Committee's deliberations included the following: o Review of tors. Hoppe's will and tour: order and discussion of how tht..- Park could be developed and operated within the spirit cf the will. o Review of the 1918 Plan prepared ;or the Park o Inventory of other gardens in thr Metropol Area "iscussion of ;,otential themes. o Presentations by Ray Ford, the Noerenberg's jardener, and Arla Lindberg, currently the gardener for the Hennepin County Park Reserve District at the park regarding their percer,.ion of current operations and future development. o Review of the history and importance of estate gardens in the Lake Minnetonka area and Eddie Phelps role in the planning and development of these gardens. C o Review of two distinctly different concepts for developing the area south of County Road 51 utilizing the theme of Estate Garrinne of l al•n Mi nnnfnnLe o Review of a concept for utilizing the area north of County Road 51 as a "Nature Area. Because of the two distinct areas of the park as specified in the will this Report is also divided into two distinct sections. II. THE AREA SOUTH OF COUNTY ROAD 51. A. THEME: "ESTATE GARDENS OF LAKE MINNETONKA" 1. Whir Estate Gardens? In discussing themes for the garden, the Committee wzs guided by two objectives. First the Committee felt that it was important to provide a garden that would not duplicate the efforts of other gardens it the metropolitan area. In addition, the Committee saw the park as an area that should provide an educational as well as recreational experience for those who visited. In considering these goals, the Committee came up with a variety of possibile themes, including the following: o Victorian o Old English o Winter garden o Minnesota Native Plants o Estate Garden Of these themes, the Estate Garden theme generated majority support from the committee. Advantages of the Estate Garden theme include: o It will not duplicate the efforts of other gardens in the Metropolitan area. mm o Estate gardens are a signifcant and historical feature of the Lake Minnetonka area. o Eddie J. Phelps, a nationally known landscape architect, designed many of the estate gardens in the area and lived in Wayzata. Mr. Phelps was one of the first landscape architects in the Metropolitan area and had a major impact cn the profession'_, growth in the area. 2. Backyrcund of Estate Gardens Btate gardens are an interesting part of the history of the Lake Minnetonka area. Many residents of the area, had elaborate gardens designed for their estates. The gardens both indicated and graced the style of those living around take Minnetonka. An important figure in this fascination with elegant and expansive gardens was Edmund J. Phelps, a local landscape architect known nationwide for his work. Phelps worked in the area from approximately 1925-1950. His work can be found in the Twin Cities, Duluth, Chicago and Washington, D.C., as well as the states of Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Tennesa-e. A list of his clients indicate that he worked with some of the more r-ominent citizens in the Lake Minnetonka area. Phelps played a significant role in the development of the profession of landscape architecture, and the Estate Gardens represent a substantial element of his work. The Committee feels that this theme establishes a tribute to Phelps and his work on the "Estate Gardens of Lake Minnetonka." 3. Elements of an Estate Garden The completed garden of an estate incorporated many elements that worked together as a whole to bring about a total design. Elements -7- representative of estate gardens in general included the following list. Phelps incorporated these elements into the gardens he did in the area. o Geometric forms and fanciful garden shapes such as a 4 leaf clover o Borders of the gardens and lawns were often hedges o Color coordinated gardens o Architectural structures as focal points of the garden area such as gates, gazebos, garden houses o Rose gardens o Perrenial gardens o Garden walls or hedges as enclosures that define "outdoor" rooms o Water features such as pools and fountains o Large canopy trees o Highly manicured lawns In developing gardens incorporating these elements, Phelps paid particular attention to proportion, or the relationship of one element to another. Phelp_ was concerned with "the scale with which one thing is related to another, the house with the lawn, the gazebo with the rise garden, the pool with the terrace or the steps with the wall." It is the committee's desire to continue this tradition of "proportion" wit'i the Noerenberg site. This con--ept of spatial relationships ca.i he seen in the proposed plan for the garden in the transition from the visitor center to the formal floral display area, to the manicured estate grounds, to the more natural edges of the estate. The plan includes several elements of - 8 - architecture as focal points on the estate including the visitor center and memorial arbor, the lakeside gazebo and the grape arbor. Additional architectural features are anticipated including a pool, fountains, benches and observation platforms. B. CONCE"T PLAN FOR NOERENBERG MEMORIAL COUNTY PARK - "A TRADITIONAL ESTATE GARDEN" 1. Design Considerations and Site Analysis In looking at the vegetation and topography of the Noerenberg site with the intent to develop an estate garden, special consideration was given to the following features or characteristics of the land: a. Open, Sunny Areas: Up to five large areas of this type are evident on the size. Their specific features range from good to poor soil, flat to sloping terrain, major relationship to the lake as opposed to that of the road, existing gardens to natural area. Suggested uses, depending on particular area, could include gardens, lawns, parking or water features. b. Low, Wet Areas: The land charac rized by this feature is close to the road and is occasionally flooded. Suggested use is extensive planting of low maintenance plant materials and for a possible natural water feature. c. Open Understory with Mature Canopy While mu:;h of the vegetation of this type is close to the lake, some of it does extend north to the road. These areas include mature trees, steep slopes, and a willow allee. It is recommended that no major construction occur within the driplines of the trees. Possible uses could include shade plantiigs and/or manicured - g - lawns creating the feeling of wide open spaces with paths for circulation and benches for sitting. d. High Points: There are four high points in the park, each with unique characteristics. They are potential sites for areas overlooking the fo nnal garden, the rest of the estate or the lake. 2, Major Components of the Plan In looking at the existing features of the Noerenberg site and the design elements of estate gardens discussed previously, two distinctly different concept plans were developed. The first of these, "A. Traditional Estate Garden," is recommn,,nded. A second "Modified Estate Garden" concept with a long drive through the park with parking near the channel was also considered. The "Traditional" concept is recorinended by the Committee. It includes the following elements and features: a. _ar : In a traditional estate garden, the entry was important as it gave hints of the garden to come. In this concept, the driveway is short with entrance thru a "grand gate" indicating the "elegance" of what is tc follow. The drive takes the visitor to the visitor center first, as it would take a guest to the hone. Landscape plantings near the entrance and along the road to the east will add to the "grand gate" entrance to the Estate. The present entry point would be retained with another pillar added to the east creating separate entrance and exit gates. Additional landscape plantings would be added to enhance the "grand gate" feeling. The parking area would be limited to - 10 - space for 50 cars. Bike and "walk in" access would also be available at this point. The drive and parking area are limited in size to minimize "hard cover" on the site. b. Visitor Center: A visitor center of approximately 1,800 square feet is proposed. It will be the first thing experienced by all visitors coming into the garden off of County Road 51. The center should include a lobby and reception area, and a classroom/lounge capable of accommodating up to 80 people. Restrooms, a small office and area for storage area provided. An outside patio is also anticipated. The architectural stale should recall that of the former house that should also be replicated in the memorial arbor. c. ForYnal Garden: The formal garden starts from the visitor center. Several key characteristics anticipated in the fonnal garden include: o A carefully designed sequence of experiences o Enclosures and intimate spaces o Forma' beds in geometric designs with color schemes o Views to other architectural features, the manicured grounds, and the Lake o Use of garden structures: benches, arbors, walls, terrace, [)ools and fountains Special consideration will be given to selecting plant materials and garden features that will be of interest on a year-round basis. Plant materials that hold fruit over winter or with color or texture of interest in the wlrl—r will be considered in developing specific plans for projects to occur within the formal garden area. d. Manicured Grounds: The visitor, after spending time in the formal garden, would then prozeed to the manicured lawn area. Characteristics of this area include: o Mowed lawns under large canopy trees o Shrub massings for color and texture o Blankets of ea►•ly blooming or shade tolerant flowers in the lawn o Crisp edges o Paths and benches as architectural features Natural Area: The visitor experience from the manicured grounds then proceeds to the natural area at the edge of the Estate. Characteristics include: o Recreated forms of natural plant communities requiring low maintenance o Paths and observatio,i platforms allowing viewing of the Estate and Lake An added benefit of this area of the site would be to provide a vegetative and visual buffer from the Lake channel and road that it borders. f. Evergreen Buffer: Consistent with Mrs. Hoppe's will the area east of the parking lot to the boundary of the park ►rill be planted with evergreens to buffer the neighbor to the east. The mass of plantings will also include other plant materials to add color and texture of interest. - 12 - g, Memorial Arbor: The existing arbor asnould be removed and replaced with one replicating the architectural style of the house. Specifically, the memorial arbor should recall the feeling of the porch and utilize the pillars salvaged when the house was raised. h. Gazebo: The boathouse/gazebo is being restored in 1985. The top story will be a pleasant place to rest with panoramic views of the Lake, formal garden, and the remainder of the Estate. i. Maintenance Services: A small work area and storage space is provided as part of the visitor center building. The storage of most maintenance equipment and large materials and supplies will be in the main Darn across County Road 51. j. Irrigat: n System: The water distribution system will require some improvement as the existing system is antiquated and a maintenance problem.. 3. Capital Funding Capital funding for the development of the Estate Garden will come '0vt A froin twa possible sources. Excess earnings from the funds given by Mrs. Hoppe will be used for development projects. In addition, the District will seek contributions from individuals, organizations, foundations, and corporations to finance the development of the park, particularly for sponsorship of specitic features (fountains, pools, plaza, etc.) as called for in the concept plan Preliminary Cost Estimates (based on 1985 construction) are as follows: - 13 - o 50 Car Parking Lot E 35,000 o 1800 Square Feet Visitor Center 180,000 o Water Distribution System 100,000 o Memorial Arbor 15,000 o Utilities 30,000 o Plantings (east side of property) 25,000 Total $385,000 C. OPERATIONS PLAID 1. Target Audiences The District has the opportunity to focus the programs and services it offers at the Estate Gardens at various target groups. Target groups include garden clubs, school groups, and senior citizen groups. By focusing on the specific interests of these groups a clientele will be developed. Educational and historical displays, exhibits, tours, and other programs describing estate gardens, the Noerenberg Estate and the lifestyle of the Lake Minnetonka Area will be developed. Public use of the area will include general public "browsing" through the Estate with the visitor center as the focal point at which the visitor will get a general orientation and/or specific information on the Estate. 2. Programs There are many programs that could be incorporated into the Estate Garden to provide for more pleasurable and educational experiences for visitors of all types. Possibilities include: -14- o Slide presentation regarding estate gardens of the past; highlighting unique features of several gardens o Displays and classes for floral arranging, drawing, art, etc. o History of Eddie Phelps and his work in the Lake Minnetonka area o History and pictures of the Noerenberg home and its original garden and lifestyle o Explanation of the layout and development of the Estate in the past and current plan o Guided tours through the Estate with interpretation directed at the history of the garden and the estate gardens of the Lake area o Public events celebrating the garders of the past o Selected private affairs such as weddings Program efforts will be adapted to the :,,2cific target groups. For instance, a garden club could incorporate into their visit to the Estate a presentation by one of the gardeners about the various types of flowers in the garden and how they were cared for by Ray Ford. A school group could focus on the history of the garden with special activit;es designed especially for that group by a park programmer. -ls- 3. Public Hours of the Estate Garden Proposed hours for the park: Peak Season (May through October) 8 a.m. - 9 p.m. Off Season (November - April) 9 a.m. - 5 p.m. 4. Staff Staff will be needed in the following areas: Attendants: A number of seasonal attendants will be necessary to assure the smooth operation of the park. These positions include attendants, and visitor center receptionists. Prograr Staff: On a part-time basis, program personnel will be responsible for public and group reservation programs. This will include guiding tours, coordinating large special events, designing special programs for groups, etc. Maintenance: Currently, three seasonal maintenance staff are needed to maintain the Estate. It is not anticipated that additional maintenance personnel will be required if this plan -is implemented. Secures: The Estate will require security personnel. This will be accomplished through seasonal rangers hired specifically for the Noerenberg Memorial County Park. Schedules will be dictated by visitor patterns and ►gill include both the garden and Nature Area portions of the Estate. Propagation: Plantings for the garden would be annually propagated in the District nursery, therefore eliminating the - 16 - need for a large greenhouse as proposed in the previous Master Plan. 5. Operating [budget The operating budget for the Noerenberg Memorial County Park will come from three primary sources: Interest from Trust Fund: As specified in the will, earnings from the trust will be used primarily for maintenance purposes. Accnrding to the court order it appears to be appropriate to use principal for operating programs, however it is the intent of the Committee that the principal be conserved to provide adequate earnings to finance future operating costs.. Fees and Charges: These could include 4)*t*kirf7--4eeS, special program fees, rentals, etc. A,. � <i r �� � <<� '1.«. . Additignal Gifts or Contributions: Additional gifts may be possible for specific projects. examples may include a book on Estat- -gardens of Lake Minnetonka, exhibits or displays, etc. 111. THE AREA NG, COUNTY ROAD 51 A. THEME: "TtiF NOERENBERG NATURE AREA" In her will, mrs. Hoppe indicated that the land, north of County Road 51, shculd be "managed in its app-oximate natural state as a place wherein wild fowl and ,)ther wild game will be allowed to congregate on this land as a natural area..." Attention must be given to how this area will be developed and maintained. B. CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE NOERENBERG NATURE AREA 1. Major Components a. Landscape Plartings Natural plant communities will be enhanced here with - 17 - emphasis on color and texture for visual interest as well as their ability to attract wildlife. b. Hiking Trail A hiking trail will be developed out. to the point. It's emphasis will be on enhancing th, na,ural feeling of the area. c. Parking and Access D. 12 car gravel parking lot is planned with additional overflow parking on a grass surface. d. Obervation "Blind" The northwest corner of the main barn should he utilized as an area to observe wildlife and tn, lake beyond. Special plantings should G-? planned near this area so as to attract wildlife for viewing by Nature Area visitors. Much of the rem-,inder of the barn will be used as space to store maintenance equipment and materials to carry out maintenance functions. 2. Capital Funding for the Nature Area Capital costs for this portion of the Park will be minimal. preliminary cost estimates are as follows: o 12 car parking lot S 5,000 o Modifications to the barn 15,000 o Trail development 5.000 o Landscape plantings 25,000 T07A'_ $50,000 C. OPERATIONS PLAN The Nature Area will he open •_he same fours as the Estate Carden. Most visitors will use the area '.heir own" without staff - 18 - as-,istance. Limited programming could include: guide wildfl(,.ger w6lks and early morning bird -watching. Staffing will conk s* of maint nance and security personnel. Both will be dcne „ personnel hires for the Estate Garden portion of the site. �u.bl�c �,lm.•��s ���. '�C-new/�{� �`-f-�r .�oN�=P LPG �'P CERTIFICA..� OF SURVEY FOR C,{ASKA MARINA OF LAKE MINNETONKA PdEL X� M in Government Lot 1, Section I hereby certify t"at th-_ 's a true and correct repre.,enta,.ior, of r surrey of the botndaries of all of L-t 6 and the FLnt 50 feet of i�t 7 L,ydiard's Pa and that part of Governmen.. Lot Section 8, Township 117 Nort' Rang] 23 West of the 5th Pr' ,ci, •l Meridian, des- cribed as follows: Commencing at a point 724 feet on wring of West from a point of East lln, of acid Government Lot 1 distant 675.91 "eet South of meander c:,rner No. 57 on the t-ath shore of Maxwell Bay, Lake Minnetonka, said East line being assumed to have a bearing of North for purposes of this descrip- tion; thence North 2008' East a di,- tance of 198.4 feet; thence Sol- 87052' East a distance of 70 fact to the point of beginning of the property being described; thence North 2008' East to the shore of Maxwell gay; thence Southwesterly ®lone said shore to a line drawn Parallel with and 858 feat at right angles most of the East line of said Government Lot 1, thence South parallel with said East line to the Northerly line of Co,inty Road No. 51; than, Southeasterly along said Norther : line to a line drawn South �'O8' West from the print of beginning; thence , orth 2008' Fart to the point of beginning, and of the location of all build- ings thereon. It does not pur- port to show other improvements or encroachments. Gore . C0ffir. 6o64 Lend •eyor and Pl++rw,er Long Ieite, ninnesota Scale: I" - 5G' Date : 1-2u-83 0 i Iron marker I — r— r s y --Er�sfm9 decks i i , i� zoo A IhtETI , APR 81985 To: Mayor Butler Council Members L, ORONO Fran: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date: April 3, 1985 Subject: #860 Funk/Rogosheske, 540 Old Crystal Bay Road - Final Subdivision - Resolution The applicant has fulfilled all conditions set forth at preliminary approval except for the one dealing with the issue of the future owners of Lots 2, 3 and 4's sharing in the maintenance and upkeep of White Oak Circle. The City also wished to see how the future owners of Lots 2, 3 and 4 were to pay for damages to the road sustained during the construction period. I have been advised that the homeowners' association's covenants are to ad- dress all these issues. I have enclosed the information submitted to me by the applicant that would confirm their intent to join. Charles Kelley has informed me that the homeowner's association has not been formalized because the developer has not released the road to the association because. I have advised the applicant that I cannot recommend final approval until this matter is resolved and th%z association formalized. The applicant has asked to be scheduled for the April 8th meeting when I advised that our April 22nd agenda would not deal with lane use applications. I have prepared a final resolu'.ion approving the plat. Council may wish to act on the final flat and direct staff to delay filing the plat until the matter of the homeowner's association is resolved to staff's satisfaction rather than table action until May. 1 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF WHITE OAK OVERLOOK FILE NO. 860 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "City Council") has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision by George C. Funk and Judith A. Rogosheske, the subdividers; and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all standards c>f the RR-113 zoning district finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that will allow its use as a single family residence to be fully developed without the need of any variances; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility ease- ments. 2. Dedication on the plat of right-of-way for a public road, shown as Old Crystal Bay Road. 3. The subdividers have entered into an association with the neighboring property owners already served by White Oak Circle, the members of the association have created main- tenance covenants wherein each of the abutting and/or bene- fiting lot owners covenants and agrees to permanently main- tain and pay the cost of maintenance for said private road in addition to assigning responsiblity and payment for damages sustained to said road during construction periods. 4. Dedication to the City of a Flowage and Conservation Easement providing for limitations on the use of drainage - ways described therein and shown on the plat as "drainage easements". S. Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fee in the amount of $600.00. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6. Payment to the City for the legal review ane. fi ling of the plat, easements and covenants in the amount of $75.00. NO�i, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Counci 1 of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of white Oak Overlook, Hennepin County, Minnesota; subject to the condition that the aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Registrar of Titles of the County of Hennepin on or before October 8, 1985 together with a certified original copy of this Resolution and the easement noted above. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota, this 8th day of April, 1985. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor WHITE OAK OVERLOOK .�� ^i�_',:1:.. a:.~i_�i �_;:rP.�ii .Ir!'')���—\. rrr.•1 r I � r O _ oo�_ L �_ x G; 3 I 33 33 •fir — r Q a— Iw » +.wr•.i•+s Mrr. .. rog : A SCALE IN FEET COFFIN a GRONBERG, IN DENOTES IRON MONUMENT ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, PLANNEF BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED LON-' LAKE, MINNESOTA r r� MORWEST BAN06 October 17, 1984 Dear Neighbors. Norwesf B�nk Minneapolis. NA Eighth Street and Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota 55479 612,'372.8123 It has become apparent, after the City Council meeting of October 15, that White Oak Circle will remain a private road. Also, the City Council gave preliminary approval to the FVn1,/ "osheske sub -division with several conditions. Each one of the conditions contained in the preliminary approval has to be satisfied before the City Council will approve the final sub -division. I believe everyone from the neighborhood who attended the City Council meeting would agree that the only way we can protect White Oak Circle is to form a homeowners assocation. A statement regarding mandatory membership in the association would have to be included in the property title of each lot to ensure control and responsibility of each homeowner in the association. The Declaration and By -Laws of the 6ssociation would be drafted, with everyone's input, in a manner tha` would protect the raid. As we discussed at cur last neighborhood meeting, legal expenses would run r x-)ghly $1,000 to establish the association, plus a small fee for the Prorerty Title adjustment to reflect the mat-datery membership (roWILly $200 in total for all lots as per followup meeting with Pcry, the attorney, and myself). Before we give the attorney the green light to ,)roceed, it would be to everyone's best interest to sign a release tlat indicates each family's approval to proceed with the establishrr�nt of the association and advance a deposit against the qu)ted legal expense. Please sign and indicate belru your family's approval or disapproval in the establishment of the association. If approval is indicated, please also enclose a check payable to the "white Oak Circle H ineowner's Assocation" in the am rant of $100. Please return the signed release and deposit to me by October 23rd. Your prorpt attention to this matter will be appreciated by all the neighbors. Sincerely, Charlie Kelley 4849T � "o-, TO: Judy Rogoshesl;e & George Funl: From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date: October 19, 1984 Subject: Pre1 irninc-ry F'opprovc•1 0-C Subdivision Conditions of Approval: 1. Approval of prelimint:ry plc•t per purvey rI. Gronber g dz4tcd August 28, 1' 84. ?. Dr-ainageway that intersects lots and 3 must be shr..rwn as drainage easements (minimum width of 2"n') - drainageway may be redirected along lot line of lots 2 and in order to not place severe restrictions on building envelope. Dry areas of lots 2" and 3 must be e::clusive of drainage areas. 3. In order to alleviate neighbors' concer—S with existing access or approach road to lot 4 - applicants have agreed to reel i qn shared lot line between lots 3 and 4 so that lot 11 will abutt the improved cul-de-sac. 4. Dedication of 33' of right-of-way for Old Cry5t.•1 Et,7. Rozd. 5. tlpplicant to provide written confirmation to City that the following Council directives are satisfied: a) Fr 'Doi of participation in future rnc-intenance i..nd upkeep of White Oaks Circle. b) How future developers of lots, _-, 1 4 are. to assume financial responsibility for the damage to White Oak Circle sustained during construction. Final Submittals: All of the following must be provided to the City two weeks before the meeting at which Council will grant final approval of plat. Council meets oi, the end and 4th Mondays of the month. .ar Council meetings are rescheduled if they conflict with 1 1 hol i da.)•s. White Oak Circle Homeowners Association We approve/disapprove of the establishment of the Homeowners Association. /&z Signature If approval is granted, please enclose a check in the amount of $100. NttE `i APR 81985 To: Orono Council Members L' T ORONO From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator Date: April 1, 1985 Subject: #876 Randy Asplund, 3424-3444 Eastlake Street - Variance Please note - Planning Commission tabled this item on their November agenda because applicant called in sick. There was no December Planning Commission meeting. Applicant was notified but failed to attend the January meeting. At that meeting Planning Commission voted 3-0 to recommend denial based on no hardships demonstrated by applicant. Applicant then requested the item be placed on the March Planning Commission agenda. The neighbors were re -notified, applicant stated he would be present. Applicant failed to attend the March Planning Commission meeting. Planning Commission voted 6-0 to deny based on no hardships shown. Applicant has been notified in writing that this item is on the April 8 Council agenda. Since applicant has not appeared before Planning Commission to plead Isis case, I would request your review if he is present, and direct staff to draft a resolution appropriate to youi action. Zoning District - LR-IA Application - A. Variance to construct an 8' high fence along property line adjacent to city street and within 75' lake setback area. B. After -the -fact variance to allow concrete patios within 75' of the lakeshore. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Fence Application Exhibit B - Patio Applicatior. Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Property Owners List Exhibit E - Survey Sh�:wing Proposed Fence Location Exhibit F - Survey to Scale Showing Existing Patios Exhibit G - Code Sections Pertinent to Fence Application Exhibit H - Planning Commission Minutes 11/19/85, 1/21/85, 3/18/85 Exhibit I - Planning Commission Action Notices 1/23/85, 3/20/85 1 A. Fence The applicant wishes to construct an 8' privacy fence along the south line of his property abutting Fastl . Street. There is a 3' berm with pine trees existing at this time. It is not clear from the application whether the fence will be placed on top of or alongside the berm. The berm was constructed when the new houses were built and is above the natural grade of the surrounding area. By existing codes, applicant would be allowed a maximum F' fence along the property line in the side and rear (east) yards and a 2 1/2' fence in the front (lake) yards extending to the lake. Eastlake Street can not be considered a "major thorough- fare" hence a continuous 6' fence would not be allowed along it on that basis. I believe you are familiar with the existing code sections dealing with fences and can relate this application to the fence along Bayside Road just to t'e east. You could also expect, I am sure, opposition to granting of a variance by the property owners along Eastlake Street who would lose a partial view of the lake. Area properi-.y owners did attend the Planninq Commission meetings where this item was on the agenda. In order to approve, you would have to find a hardship exists and show no adverse effect on the purpose and intent of the Zoning Code nor the health and welfare of the public. B. Patios at 3424 and 3444 Eastlake Street During inspection of the septic system at the newly constructed house at 3464 Eastlake Street staff noted that con- crete patios had been constructed at 3424 and 3444. The appli- cant was notified to remove 'hem as non -allowed hardcover, and he opted to apply for an afte_ the -fact variance as an amendment to the fence application. The concrete patio and sidewalks within the 75' lakeshore seti)ack at 3424 Eastlake Street, constitute 216 square feet or 3.3% hardcover where none is a 1 Z • .-r ?. The concrete patio and sidewalks at 3444 Fastlake Stree- :onstitute 495 square feet or 8.0% hardcover where none is allowed. Again. in order to approve these you must find a hardship, and show no adverse effects on the intent and purpose of the code nor on the health and welfare of the public The Applicant was told by staff that there is little chance fo: approval of varianti-vs for either the fence or the patios, and it was applicants wish to proceed with the applications regard- less. 2 U J r CITY OF ORONO � )�1e ` � �� VARIANCE APPLICATION pplic Lion Fee 10U.00� After -the -Fact Fee .00 --------------------------------------------------------------- AA PROPERTY LOCATION �t Site Address��- Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Please check one -- Is the property abstract or -4— torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name/ �/ ,��L �%�%� Phone Cif 7 Mailing Address y5'AE ------------------------------------------ •-------------------------------- OWNER Name '�����/' L Phone Mailing Address Date Property Acquired .- (month/year) I (do (do not) :also own the adjacent parcels of land. ------------------------------------ PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residen l Other (specify) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost 3 Ono. D O Describe request in detail: ------------------------------------------ ---------------------------- VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances ( Front _ Side Reat).. U''T 25%4 tither HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting f om str* t enforcement of zoning regulations: c LL icy /��%/Z_ -c< (1 ?le,,,", DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROP%RTY CO►iDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance:-ith Zoning Code Requirements: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS I. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Plat Map. ------------------------•-------------------------------------------------- The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above inft- mation has not been included. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or zequested by the Zor:ing Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or -nusual expenses incurred in review of this -.,.pp) !cation, and certif ies that the i►j:ormation supplied is true and correct to the ;best h'er know ge.�/'- -DateApplicant's signat '' OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner reby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorize onable entry onto the property by city staff, consultants, agents, co►... ,sion members,- and Co ncil members for purposes of gation and verification of s 'uest.,� % Owner's signatu e _ Date / I Applicant must havft all submittals i,. the City office, :5 dayi before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings .•se held on' he third Monday of each month. CITY OF ORONO VARIANCE APPLICATION Application Fee Y100.00 After -the -Fact Fee $200.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATIOn I, , , Site Addres Property Identification Number (F.I.D.) Please check one -- Is the property 71K— abstract or. torrens? Please att&ch legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Phone / ` ailing Address ---------------------------------------------------- O+' . d Name —_ Mailing Address _ Date Propert; Acquired 3y� (month/year) I (do Cf(donotf alsD own the adjacent pare.. of land. ---------------------------------------------------- ------------------ PRESENT USE OF PROPFF TY Present Zoning District Pre nt Use of Property Residential Other (specif;,) --------------------------------------------- UESCRI"TION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $_ Ll ef rec�ues tail /� - �i- VARIANCES REQITIRED lot Area Lc+* Widt h e,k__ Hardcover Setback \a lances ( Front .dc Rear. Other HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS I. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603Government Center 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes ( M10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. C.•rtificate of survey. 5. P`jt Map. --------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- The Applicant and Property Owner most sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. ----------------------------------------------------- ------------------- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant herel-j agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Adminis-rator,agreesto pay allfeesand/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his%ner knowledge. Applicant's signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and f-irther authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission member and CouncII members fo urposes of investigation and verification is est. Owner's sign ure Date Applicant must have Is into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. CITY OF ORONO P.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 5:i323 TELEPHONE: 473.7358 ec �a of For —z Fund Object IPlogram Div. Amount r� GENERAL RECEIPT N? 16,165 19 DOLLARS CITY OF ORONO GENERAL RECEIPT P.O. Box 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 TELEPHONE: 473 73581 i Received i C%n 9:— By — N0 6381 19 DOLLARS ti "' •+A► Nr w 1 � r .r J — t- y C V � • 7. OY � V • � . �i �N _1, e A'" • � So So So J IQL TONKA I NI q� AESTVIEW ti 4 So so 5 Z vi �' 3 - a� .� o► a toL. 199 Z54 fi217 I ti�►l ' _ � .� OXFORD - S - } - — o '.jr �._ cco — w Y' 411-- L• cr '^ x N � � (� � ► O � w �i S j r KUN DATE :0/10/84 BATCH 006 38 05-117-23 13 0021 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME V H LARSON ETAL TAXPAYER VINCENT H LARSON NAME/ADDR 25404 LAKE ROAD BAY VILLAGE OHIO 44140 38 05-117-23 13 0036 PROP ADDR 03409 EASTLAKE ST 06''tIER NAME ANDREW FLEISCHHACKER TAXPAYER 0MREW FLEISCHHAKER NAME/ADDR 3409 E LAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0039 PROP ADDR 03435 EASTLAKE ST 06NER NAME SAM BROWN ETAL TAXPAYER CHARLES BALGAARD NAME/ADDR 3435 LAKE ST E LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0043 PROP ADOR 03444 EASTLAKE ST OWNER NAME ORVILLE E KEIRAN ET AL TAXPAYER ASPLUNO DEJELOPMENT NAME/ADDR 14840 COPPERFIELD PLACE MINNETONKA MH 55343 38 05-117-23 13 0046 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME ORVILLE E KEIRAN ET AL TAXPAYER RANDALL ASPLLJUD NAME/ADDR 14840 COPPERFIELD PLACE MINNETONKA Mt 55391 PROP ADDR CWJIER NAME TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH 006 00015 NAME/ADCR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 05-117-23 13 0032 03405 EASTLAKE ST DEN?U S MCGREEVY DEJ:NIS MCGREEVY 3405 E LAKE ST DRONC IIN 55356 38 CS-117-23 13 0037 03465 EASTLAKE ST LUVErN L CA1:PilELL LUVERN L CAMGBELL 3465 E LAKE ST %!i 70 LONG LAKE MH 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0040 03415 EASTLAKE ST 00101A M PRIM iER DOIRJA M PRIMMER 3017 BROOK LANE MINNETONKA MN 55361 38 05-117-23 13 0044 03424 EASTLAKE ST ORVILLE E KEIRAN ET AL ASPLUID OEVELOPMEJIT 14840 COPPERFIELD PLACE MINNETOUKA Mt1 55343 38 05-117-23 14 0053 03403 EASTLAKE ST FRANCES MARY .-TERSON GARY A KOSLOWSKI 3403 E LAKE ST ARONO MN 55356 RLPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 17 38 05-117-23 13 0035 03407 EASTLAKE ST PETER C MEYER DAVID C WRNS 3407 EASTLAKE ST ORONO F,N 55356 38 05-117-23 :3 0038 03425 EASTLAKE ST FRED J BARTZ WALTER it OLSON 501 HEMLO�K DR BUJNSVILLE tl'J 55378 38 05-117-23 :7 0042 03464 EASTLAKE ST M A N HUNSLEY MARK A HUNSLEY 5820 C15VINSTON LA MI�INETONKA JtN 55345 38 05-117-23 13 0045 D R CARLSON A P M CARLSON DARYL R CARLSON 3470 BAYSIDE ROAD ORONO MN 55356 38 05-117-23 41 0022 00405 OXFORD RD A H BURTCH JR A G L BURTON A H BURTON JP A G L BURT04 405 OXF070 ROAD LONG LAKE M!, SF356 try I �130•7 ;,.••- -- s733-• - .�,.•- -- s175• - -- 2z1.55-- Vtt.l �31. S lf7D Y Jt d9 e o ra r av EA 5TLA W.Ew 408 241,46 II 75 II i � � "' i •i — �' it I°p • � �I � � \ S i --') d8-33 '573 --•'� lSt.23 Te 5.., J ' t •� \ ,` \ `l it a 75•0 -• ;p- °s733 --q,4y -" f;p r--------- c 7L=4• _' 931.4 �/ / I O f t \ .7 O I 1 131\T \ _ �' ap I 193zo \ \Q IL L— uld Jy D o;naye Easevtoen �10.1 - �307 3733- 57.75 1 %93z-S '133 '173.4 e 932.1 - --_ -- 200.0 -- ♦3�•S lf3D'Ec�9e o f r,,,v,l-;'ji0 3337 l319 EASTLAKE '4ne STREET First Floor Elevation - 932•5 feet. § 10.03 Subd. 7. fine B ',tding Per Lot. Except in the case of Planned Residential bevel,.- r.-,ents as provided for hereinafter, no more than one principal bu:l('.ing shall be 1-�cated on a lot. Subd. 8. Lots to Face Streets. Each lot shall face on a public street or appropriate private easement. Subd. 9. Accessory Buildings. F� A. Time of Construction. No accessory building or structure shall be constructed on any lot prior to the time of construction of the principal building to which it is accessory. { B. Height Restrictions. No accessory building in the "R" District shall exceed the height of the principal building except barns or stables which shall be subject to the approval of i the Council. C. Area Restrictions. In all "R" Districts no accessory building shall exceed 1,000 square feet of floor area except barn, stable or greenhouse. D. Location. No detached garages or other acces- sory building shall be located nearer the front lot line than the principal building on that lot except on lots which have frontage on a lake. Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 1. Location of Principal Building to Lakeshore. No principal building shall be located closer than 75 feet to the natural ordinary high water mark of a lake abutting the property. This lakeshore setback shall be determined as the mean horizontal distance between the natural ordinary hijh water mark on the lakeshore and the allowable building line. 2. Variance From Lakeshore Setback. Any application for a variance from the requirements of Item 1 above shall be referred to the Minnehaiia Creek Watershed District for its approval before final action by the Council. Subd. 10. Conditional sory buildings on through lots require a conditional use permit. Source: Ordinance No. 155 Effective Date: 2-14-74 Use Permit Required. All acccs- located in "R" Districts shall Subd. 11. Dwelling Use Prohibited. No cellar, basement, tent, trailer, or accessory building shall at any time be used as an occupied dwelling. ORONO CC 255 t4--1-84) § 10.03 Subd. 12. Crowding Principal Building. No accessory building or structure, unless an integral part of the principal building, shall be erected, altered, or moved within ten feet of the principal building. Subd. 13. Garages. Accessory buildings which are for the storage of automobiles shall have the doors thirty feet or more from the property line when said doors face on a public alley or street. Subd. 14. Yards and Open Spaces. A. Reduction Prohibit(. -A. No yard or other -pen space shall he reduced in area or dimensions so as to make such yard or other open space less than the minimum required by the Zoning Chapter and if the existing yard or other 7,pen space as existing is less than the minimum required, it shall not be further reduced. B. Application to Only One Dwelling or Group. No required yard or other open space allocated to a building or dwelling group shall be used to satisfy yard, other open spaces, or minimum lot area requirements for any other building or dwelling group. Subd. 15. Non -Encroachments. The following shall not be considered to bA encroachments on yard requirements: A. Chimneys, flues, belt courses, leaders, sills, pilasters, lintels, ornamental features, mechanical devices, cornices, eaves, gutters and the like, provided they do not extend more than 1-1/2 feet, off-street parking except as hereinafter regulated. A. Name plate signs for one family dwellings; lights for illuminating parking areas, loading areas or yards for safety and security purposes, provided the direct source of light is not visible from the public right-of-way or adjacent residential property may be located to within five feet of the front lot line. -4 C. Fences which do not exceed 3-i/2 feet in height, fences nc;t over six feet in height along the front lot line of lake frontage lots which front on a major thoroughfare, terraces, steps, uncovered o6r.ches, stoops or similar structures, which do not extend above the height of the ground floor level of the principal building and extend to a distance of not less than two feet from any lot line. -Y D . In depth of two feet nor feet, fire escapes not Walls not to exceed a street parking. side or rear yards only, bays not to exceed a to contain an area of more than twenty square to exceed a width of three feet, fences and height of six feet above grade and open off- ORONO CC 256 (4-1-84) 5 10.03 7 E. Rear yard only; balconies, accessory structures except that no structure shall be closer than five feet from the rear lot line, breezeways, detached outdoor picnic shelters and recreational equipment, except as regulated hereinafter. .1. F. Side yards only; accessory Etructures except that no accessory structure shall be closer than ten feet from any side lot line. 'rSubd. lb. Traffic Visibil;ty. No fences, structures or printing more than three feet high in the "R" District on corner lots shall be permitted to obstruct traffic visibility within a triangular area defined as follows: "Beginning at the intersection of -',e projected curb lines of two intersecting streets, thence thirty feet along one curb line thence diagonally to a. point thirty feet from the point of beginning on the other curb Ii:ie, thence to the point of beginning. Source: Municipal. Cede Effective Date: 9-14-67 Subd. 17. Essential Services. This Zoniny Chapter shall require a permit for all structures including utility poles, and right -of. -ways which are an integral part of a system for public transportation, as for transmitting power, water, heat, com minica- tions, gas or :;ewage by any public utility. The Council shall grant a conditional use permit only after a showing that the public safety, health and welfare will not be harmed by the essential services. Subd. 18. Farming. All farms in existence on January 1, 1975 shall be permitted to continue operation subject to the following conditions: A. No new "SLock farms" shall be created or existing stock farms enlarged .-ore than twenty-five percent (25%) in animals over one year old except under the provisions of a conditional use permit. In cun•,idering any such permit, the maximum number and type of animals to be kept shall be determined. The site design and method of operation shall be reviewed and the Council shall find that the proposed "stock farm", if in existence, will not in its opinion be detrimental to the public safety and the general welfare. B. the establishment of any new building for the housing of animals or fowl shall be located 150 feet or more frr:m the nearest offsite residence. C. Products v;roduced on the farm may be sold at retail. One temporary roedside stand may be est.ablishpd for conducting such business. One temporary business sign not over ORONO CC 257 (4-1-84) MIN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 19, 1984 PAGE 9 •N';3 ASnLUND, 3424 b 3444 F.ASTLAKE STREET VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING Chairperson Goetten announced that #876, Randy Asplunds application for a variance has been table6 until the next meeting of the Planning Commission. The following neighbors were present for the meeting: Harriet Hehl of 3348 Bayside Road Esther Addison of 3382 Bayside Road Barbara Huber of 3390 Bayside Road Kathe Jukish of 3280 Bayside road Don Boylan of 3240 Bayside Road Rovegno moved, Kelley seconded to table the application. Motion, ayes (6), Nays (0). #878 THOMAS KAUL INTERPRETATION OF 'ZONING CODE PUBLIC HEARING 9:45 - 9:49 Thomas and Kristi Kaul were present. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. The following neighbors were present for the public hearing: Mary Ann Stinson of 2040 Spates Avenue A.J. Tourangeau of 2060 spates Avenue Pauline Bouchard of 1860 Shoreline Drive Ronald J. Prineas of 1980 Heritage Drive Mabusth asked if any of the members of the Planning Commission were able to attend the open house given by the Kauls at 1900 Shoreline Drive. Goetten hadn't received her invitation. Rovegr.o said he had tried unsuccessfully to reach Goetten. Sime and McDonald were unable to attend. MINUTES OF THE: ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 21, 198`i PAGE. ] ATTENDANCE 7:30 PM The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Chairperson Goetten, Rovegno, and Sime. Planning Commission members McDonald, Kelley, and Callahan were not present. Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and Recorder Sutton represented the City staff. Council Representative Frahm was also present. #853 DOUG KLINT 3545 IVY PLACE SUBDIVISION OF LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT #876 RANDY ASPLUND 3424 EASTLAKE ST. VARIANCE EXTENDED PUBLIC HEARING #883 GARY PRINTUP 1261 BRIAR STREET VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 7:35-7:36 PM Tom Bernier was present. Doug Klint arrived while the Planning Commission was making the motion to approve the application. Rovegno moved, Sime seconded, to recommend approval of the plat of a lot line rearrangement known as Casco Cove finding the new building envelopes unrestricted and satisfying all standards of the LR-lC Zoning District and all existing structures meet the required setbacks. Approval is subject to the condition that a drainage easement within Lot 3 be designated on plat prior to scheduling subdivision for Council action. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). Rovegno moved, Sime seconded, to table the Asplund variance app:ic,,tion until the applicant can be present. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). At the end of the meeting, Randy Asplund sti I had not arrived at the meeting so Planning Commission acted on the application. Rovegno moved, Sime seconded, to recommend denial of the varia-ce applications of Randy Asplund for the fence and the concrete patios within 75' of the lakeshore based on the fact that the applicant has demonstrated no hardship for basis of approval of the variance. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). Gary and Linda Printup were present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaff ron noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was no one present in the audience for this public hearing. Chairperson Goetten closed the public hearing at 7:36 p.m. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 18, 1985. PAGE 6 #897 CHUCK i JANET PETERSON 2. Inspection and approval of the existing septic system for the existing house. 3. City Engineer/Public Works Director review of the access locations. 4. Applicant to execute proper drainage and utility easements. 5. Dedication of roadway on the plat if not excluded in the legal description. 6. Standard park dedication fee of $200.00 for the new lot. 7. Building envelope be at 200' wide or greater at the new building site. Motion, Ayes (6), Nayes (0). .# 6 RANDY ASPLUND 342-4-:�3444 EASTLAKE STREET VARIANCE Randy Asplund was not present. The following neighbors were present: Esther Addison of 3382 Bayside Road Barbara Huber of 3390 Bayside Road Kathe Jukisk of 3280 Bayside Road Rovegno moved, Goetten seconded, to recommend denial of the variance applications of Randy Asplund for the fence and the conciete patios within 75' of the lakeshore based on the fact that the applicant has demonstrated no hardship for basis of approval of the variance as was recommended at January 21, 1985 meeting. Chairman Callahan stated that this matter has come up again because the applicant had requested it because he couldn't make the previous meetings, therefore, even in his absence this matter wi 11 be acted upon. Motion, Ayes (6), Nayes (0). ZONING FILE NO. 876 CITY OF ORONC NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 3/20/85 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Randy Asplund COPIES TO: 3424 Eastlake Street Long Lake, MN 55391 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Variances --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of Meeting: 3/18/85 Vote: 6 For 0 Against Planning Commission recommends the following: XX Denial: For reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Planning Commissien reaff.Lrmed the action of January 21, 1985 to recommend no hardship shown. This item will be scheduled to appear before the Council on April 8, 1985. You should plan to attend this meeting. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Council April 8, L985 If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. ZONING FILE NO./876 CT°Y OF OLIO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION P.J. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 1/23/85 TO: Randy Asplund COPIES TO: 34:4 Eastlake Street Long Lake, MN 55356 TYPF OF APPLICATION: XX Variance -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of Meeting: 1/21/85 Vote: 3 For 0 Against Planning Commission recommends the following: XX Denial: For reasons noted below NOTES AND SPEC?AL CONDITIONS: Since ycu were again not presen' to comment on the application, Planning Commission briefly reviewed the requests and recommended denial based on no hardships Oemonstrated. Please contact staff as soon as possible regarding this application. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Council See Above If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). If you desire certified copies of the of`-.cial Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. rn-. ZONING FILE NO. 876 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 1-7•-85 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Randy Asplund COPIES TO: 3424 Eastlake Street Long Lake, MN 55356 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: xx Variance -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of Meeting: 11-19-84 Vote: 6 For 0 Against Planning Commission recommends the following: xx Tabled: For reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: (Applicant not present) This item is scheduled for Planning Commission review at their January 21, 1985, meeting. You will be mailed a copy of the agenda. Please contact this office if you have any questions. You should plan to attend this meeting. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Planning Commission - January 21, 1985 Applicant's next scheduleA meeting information. Deadline for r.he or f-r the is dependent upon receipt meeting is _ meeting. of additional In all cases, the application must be continued with the submittal of requested information within or the City will consider the application as formally withdrawn. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). If you desire copies of the official Planning Commission--nutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and a,,provr 1 the Planning Commission. To: Orono Council Memb(.rs A IhtETING APR 81985 L " ORONO From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator Date: April 2, 1985 Subject: l894 T.M. CrotA.y, 745 Spring Hill Road - Preliminary Sut('ivision - Lot Line Rearrangement Zonir 'istrict - LR-lA 2 Acre Lakeshore Residential List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application & Letter of Transmittal Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhib.,: D - Survey Exhibit E - Air Photo with Wetlands Overlay Exhibit F - Plat Map Showing Parcel Break Down For Final Survey Exhibit G - Conservation & Flowage Easements - Lydiard Lake Exhibit H - Conservation & Flowage Easements Over Parcel A The applicant is proposing a lot line rearrangement which will result in the separation of the existing "main" house from the "caretaker" house. The resulting lot areas are as follows: "Main House" ;East Lot): 24+/- Acres (All Dry) "Caretaker House" (West Lot): 26.8 Acres Total (8+/- Acres Dry) Please refer to Exhibits F1, F2, F3. Note that due to the extensive designated wetland and adjacent very low land on the westerly parcel, future subdivision near East Long Lake Road and Spring Hill Road is highly unlikely. However, the 8 dry acres could be subdivided in the future. We would require dedication of roadways at the time of a future plat. Planning Commission recommended requiring Conservation & Flowage Easements over the wetlands on Parcel A, which the applicant has provided. Note that (see Exhibit F-3) the easterly lot will become land -locked from the right-of-way and will require the granting of an access easement over the westerly lot to the easterly lot and over both lots to the Winston property to the south. The proposed easement is shown on the survey. Since both resulting lots have in excess of 5 acres of dry buildable land with each existing house, drainfield site testing is not required. Both existing septic systems were last inspected in 1981, and found to be in acceptable condition. They will be inspected again d1iring 1985. Since no new building sites are created, no park dedication fees are required. A proposed Flowage L Conservation Easement has been granted over Lydiard Lake, per Exhibit G. In summary, staff feels this is a reasonable lot line rear- rangement proposal. Planning Commission recommended approval subject to: 1. Revise survey to show parcels per staff recommendation in Exhibit F-2. (You have the revised survey in your packet, Exhibit D. ) 2. The appropriate access easements to be granted to the appropriate properties. 3. Combination of Parcels A and C. 4. Conservation & Flowage Easement to be granted over Parcel A. 5. Dedication of roadways to occur when property is sub- divided in the future. Staff recommends approval per the attached resolution. 2 A j* Date Rec'd 1318ss By �it�Qa.b Fee Rec' d ,fa?.SO. DO LL ►``P"R NO SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name T. M. Crosby Telephone 612-339-7101 Mailing Address 745 Spring Hill Road, Wayzata, MN 55391 PROPERTY Name Thomas M. & Ella P. Crosby Telephone 612-371-5327 OWNER Mailing Address c/o T. M. Crosby, Jr., Faegre & Benson, (Attach list if more than. one)2300 Multifoods Tower, Minneapolis, MN 55402 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Street Address 745 Spring Hill Road, Wayzata 36-118-23-21-0001 Property Identification No. (P.I.D.) 36-118-23-22-0001 Complete Legal Description to be attached to application - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- iSTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels 1 Development Size Acres Dry Land Acres Ilet Land 50 + Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check) X Residential; no. of units 2 _ Other (specify) Present Zoning District R -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes X Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: 2 Existing Units 0 New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density _ Units per Acres Minimum Lot Size: Square Feet Dry BuildaL Land Proposed Use: (check) X Residential Other (specify) ------------ --- ------- (OVER) MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Application Completed 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 4. Stamped, legal sized envelopes ( 110) pre -addressed to r--ich of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) $150.On X Preliminary Review (Class 16 II Subdivisions) $250.00 Preliminary Review $300.00 plus (Class III and all non-residential) 20.00/lot Final Plat Review (Class III) $150.00* *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fecs established by ordinance. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant's Sign -e %'% i, �,. /�,� Date t' Owner's Signatu Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are usually held on the third Mondav of each month. •: ..0. Cr. w...... A. ti r[. \•. • I�\.t l.t wfo. ... rof .•i:.:�w.ct �Loi.. o :wi.�c: <•cw . r. A. A oo ..lt .�.. i [.A. � ft rr0•[; •n.. rt r pw- ..^. • •ooir .or +n. .•wc...... ••l\ • V[r0..• DI r[f r. f.riltf 0»t�nt �t.0.�� DL 1 Ow0 f.L VDI. u Dt.ftw c .twol.w[.fo. FAEG R E eL B E N S O N �Ows�+�►' Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 UAI Dear Jeanne: Z300 MULTirOOOS TOwEP J] SOUTH SIXTH STnEET MINNEAPOLIS• MINNESOTA 55402-3894 e-:iTr- >>DD 'CIE.. .Z5.3. 3560 REPUBLIC PLAZA ]TO SCVCNTCC»T» STRCCT DC-CR, COLORADO BDEOr-.DD. 303ie9E-ee90 January 30, 1985 T. M. Crosby tw l... rrDlr t.�.. • f.OV cl.f � rt pf .... + .tw r oc.f �trr • �t Twirl. w r[+.lo. Y IOIV I� [rc.� .D«Or.Y . .• ..... .. (t'r _ � ..rf of .cor. .AOL ��c ...D •.�. lr.w trw•cr ���r. •• w• «o: � �scr \(�..•.Yi .......l DOVOI.\ .• -fir .. -._._ {. » [!,-i0 rF r After our telephone conversation of yesterday I looked at the survey, the plat books and the tax divisions of my parents property. It appears to me that the intended transaction can take place in the form of a simple lot rearrangement. I am enclosing an Egari, Field 6 Nowak survey of November 29, 1984 together with a copy of a portion of the plat book. Parcel B is to be conveyed to Donald Wildman. Parcels A and C will be conveyed to Eleanor and Fred Winston who own the property immediately adjacent to the south of Parcel A. Ultimately, Parcel C will be disregarded and included as a portion of Parcel A. It was described as an independent parcel because, at one point, Lucy Mitchell and Eleanor Winston where going to buy Parcel A together. In that event Parcel C would have gone to Eleanor. I have indicated on the copy from the plat book the approximate location of the two houses on the property. Parcel A as now described includes the farmhouse which has existed and been used as a separate dwelling since my parents built their house in 1941. Ms. Jeanne Mabus t h�� January 30, 1985 Page Two I believe that the tax parcels for the two tracts have existed independently since my parents acquired the property in 1941. My proposal would be to have a lot rearrangement whereby the farmhouse would be combined with the remainder of Parcel A. No new building sites would be created because the largest portion of Parcel A already exists as an independent tract of property. Ac•curdingly, the only transactions required would be the granting by my parents of an easement to the Winstons for the access road to replace the access road granted to the Winstons when their tract was created. Tt'e lot line rearrangement would then be effected giving the Wildmans an access easement to Parcel B. I am enclosing an application appropriate for the transaction described above. Sincerely, Thomas M. Crosby, Jr. TMC/dab Enclosures cc: T. M. Crosby ?0-1 OC 9 �/ RUN DATE 12/07;62 EATC4 JO1 38 25-118-23 33 C003 O20P ADDR 00625 SPPING HILL RD C:NER tU,ME GEO H PARTRIDGE ETAL %A: PAYER GEO H P-RTPIDGE :L"•E/ADDR 625 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA Y:N 55391 38 25-118-23 34 0003 ?-OP ADDR 00445 SPPiN3 HILL PO C::'I:R NAME H C PIPER JR ETAL TAXPAYER H C PIPER JR t:At::/ADDR G00 MULTIFO?OS BLDG MPLS MN 554G2 38 25-118-23 43 0025 ��OP «DER t:AME JOIN S L ELIZ.'OETII S C'JTHRIE TAXPAYER JOHN A ELIZ..BCTit GUTHRIE NAVE/AlCCR 275 HOLLANDER RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23 21 00C1 :1TOP ADDR 00745 SPRING HILL PO NAME THOMAS M C:?05EY ETAL TAXPAYER THCMAS M CROSSY NAME/ADOR 1600 1ST NATL 6F BLDG MPLS MN 55402 38 36-118-23 23 C001 PRCP «COR OW14ER NtnE BRUCE B DAYTON TAXPAYER ERUCE B Dt.YTC!: N-f:E/ADDR 4122 IDS MITER MPLS MN 55402 HEINEPIN COUNTY PROP'RTY IN:ORt1ATICN SYSTEM FROPERTY C:OJ_RS LIST 36 25-118-23 34 00C1 00541 SF'7If*G H:IL RO RUSS=LL MILES II JOi,fl 0 NO:7DST^C-1 541 SPRING HILL :C .44YZATA NA 55391 _3 25-118-23 43 0016 00265 HD'-LA147E7 RD KLK CG`:STRUCTION CO INC KLK CCaSTRUCIVIA CO IX:: 2755 HOLLY LANE PLYMOUTH NH SSI:47 38 35-113-23 12 C305 00795 FE:!ND«LE RO N STEVCN J UAYT6`4 STEVEN J CAYT1!4 795 14 FE;'40ALE :C WAYZATA IN 55391 33 36-113-23 22 C301 007S5 SPRINZ HILL RO TIIOF;LS M CRC-2Y ETAL Ti'.C!AS M C2095Y 16CU 1ST NATL BK BLDG t'PLS MN 53402 38 36-11S-23 24 0OC4 ERUCE D OAYTCS SPLICE B D..Y fCN 9''i0 OLD LC:4:s LAKE RD WAYZATA Mt4 55391 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE _ 33 2S-118-23 34 0002 00465 SPRING HILL RD HAPPY B STCSER JP :TARRY B STD::ER 465 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA tr: SS391 38 25-118-23 43 OC24 00325 HOLLANDER RD JOIN W A VIDELL K TULLY JC`NN L VICELL TULLY 325 CO ?0 6 0:7011:0 t^7 55391 38 36-118-23 13 0001 S H 62'"L'.4 JR EST t R l t.H::E a nCCOJRT [�rs.c.',t E03 N !"CV,02EN PLACE LOS AN_:ELES CA 9000 t '' 38 36-118-23 22 0002 00765 SPPI!:3 HIL' 'O iREDERICK WINSTC.' FRECERICK WINSTON 7:S SFRING HILL RD W. YZATA t.N 55391 TOTAL BATCH 001 00014 rn X �Jy i f T.IIS,R.23 N2 SEG 36t �:�,. tscso j �•. �3173 Rn E• ws�� rs s� ■• all it GREEN n GREEN q '� c�• :3 BROOKS - 100 JL 1w E.sr open 11( COX _ 3710 AL yr \ I � ?3 boO f iK ,jjs ,� nre�• s - 0 L. • 4 � 2 z y ~ Z EAST .�— @N0, � //2 SEC.36t T. 118t Re23 D No .Ai 3 I l R 12 ' CITY OF ORONO 0 1 ' L fitlS Rn 7t-4�,- LYI GREEN t'�.�Lk rJi°0 iuo (Li �N F -`- 13 (1.Al iiJ ?C 0 l e O 2 M1 o� 2 S[ 2 t!+ � n � isee e 0 ( •raw — — -CAST eeFe aMrea[.e •.� }r.� � r,.rr.I• � _ _ �_ _t • ii vas be 1,40 too • '� ,��� :fir'• I � •^ �, �i�, M LYD/ARO r LAKE � N 1 : i `t V J rlei` � \ 'off• �` a'uat r-•,re• t7 ( [ru v C otDr -iN \ \ ' er City clerk • � PARE �A,.t. ;.. Ssc!dn 3k to,.nsnip IIE{ Rarge 1), Hennadin Canty, Minnnol{ bast corner d sad Government Ld I. Ihaxt South 0dgfan II mmutn Ink ■esl tint of %aiJ Goternmenl Ld 1, A distant of SIR le I#0 to the paint d land being deb i,bW thaw North a1 dig raes 03 minuln 0f sec ends Erik lhersc a North 15 degree. 12 sdnutas Si 1it[ VMS tag. a distsaw e of I e: Trees y minutes at seconds Iasi, a atslanc0 of 139 SS fed: there a Norin fl twits Iasi to the SISWt of Liit Lydiafd; Ihemt teulheaslerllL along the I the east lint d SSWGatfnnunt Lot 1, meat South 0dolnes )6 minutn laslsaid east ' Adi%lanc#d40fed. mail wless, Is the soutPeast.ornet I Ihwxt Neat.. -i o.gfm M minutes $1 termdS west. aloof the Soule, llne L a distance a1 I Is ten to the toulh.est corn#( of Said Gwanment IN I. 11 minutes 21 $ty ads (ask slang Its.. enl lint of sad Gowrneml Ld 1, a ithe paint of ealinnint I the %Guth line d Sala Government Ld 1, it assumed to ew fIM1n w debase ills. ido DES,AIPTION Of PARCEL C- Thai part Of CaernmtM Lei I, S401011 111, loenthip 11IL tngt 21• Honngin Count), Asinnnda, I drA?,W as folio.$ IginA" All the nwih.esl cetner of sad Government Ld 1, hiwxt Souln Odgfees IS minutes 11 Islands 0111, a" the.nl lint ae Sad Government Ld I, a dtttaae of 5l2 to list. Ihtnct Math )1 dg(en 0) minutes W SeCWW$ East, a ditl&Kt d tS. t) I#d; Ines[ t NOW, IS dgrtes 11 minutes 51 seconds (est, a distance of 154 42 fed, then it Nonn Si dgrtn Q olnu!as 41 seaMs East, a distance of ' 10 551efa. thence vorin )i dgrtes IS minutes )0 sacondt Ent to the that at Lake Lyliard thence norinma%tefly, atone the sh- 'e of Litt Lydiard to the Patin i,nt of said Geatrnoint Ld 1, thetxe North p dgrees Ik Min.utn u %tonal Vint sking the natty i-ne as %ad C."ernmenl Ld 1 to the print of OginninS For purpaes d this Ow rip7lon ink South tint d said Cwoi—ent Let I, is ass inad to "or North N dgron 11 minslw SI Samos sent i t her Ay certify that Seri Narwy.es attested fly " at r, Eder my dirtl suptfAsion ark lil 0 t a- a kale I;qhtersd Land SW vfW ~ the Urt d the State d Atinnetda. Olod this 24111th aq d Nteterer, ISM. t Msdd thil fah dap of MarCh, INS. I G A N i 1 E l D { N O ri A C. I N C. Surveyors i7 N01t lesriVshmin*it assumwt. ta.nnesdta tegislralian-'iotpil--' Jqp NiGG RggO F LYO/ARD LAKEPA�cE� PIS i •` �V / \i T emas Crete/ .. •t �' ' eAmye, It `fast l� 0.1 1 RcE • r � ' L'.Ir M pl .: p.cp'drai eOM�S[d OItISIM FLAT too rnCM'S iROS O1 SR d[sCtl►floe Of ►it, l R: INa.rt • fRe Neldaewt Os.aw r Mr r.., or.t � wren e/ Wit. FA TaaaU III, New A nasn.psn Counlf. 1.,.shesay hN "Nee c Wei 1. Impmem"dowwone,'i'venee d serf keel- l 4. eon of 1 •1ep t..eY ]u:A•r. M err f I1 a m..grS.Irt.d.greewl Ynld tar NWtn..0 Owen dMf!..a-trfY'•%Y111, ♦.A:W1rt dl�,*dmpkah letpeYatlp d time. 1M ^110 0111111114 M..re Sae"? Wed el ntin• rims r tlAMUK SOdMf r )S6 Q led to Me tea tiM d sae %w`n.d DM.rtfr d Mf NaONNd&aOr; arse ftm •dgrea Is ..+two :I u ones Ent raj ere eer ►m r td irewd[ y� / M framed, 0..,. to Me wM a.r a sea N.deeeef w Iner d Ito hd" err (IddIO�, �R! SMu A dgrfes Y nnules as idfnn t'. nt abrg Me reertn N N r L.Nd NAtA�Rlemd • de►rarerl Qeeet. to Me mm a 6q.v".t1, somerrrdRrldl.N w1 mew beset see, eealneesl IIauY:n d M.(An w.eel f)uar1. a rrlted/ INfea M •�INr p Helmet 51 sd weds •m.L 1 deg K - DESCRIPTION OF p.RCEI 7. TN out d Cm.­1 Ld L ;atw.. )d Toensnip II{ R.N. Z), nenngin Counly M.-.dy dfc rded d kuees: Cerfaac"p nr n.t:n.d Come d taa Cw.n.stent Ld 1. Ihvx, Swan DO— It eeirttdn 11 sdthds Nest, '" lh..nt lute d sa'a CwnnmeM Lai 1. a Ots1aK t d SR. 74 Ito kill pool at West" d tn. it,' d land being d.c r me. Matt None 31 d.S(.es Olles ) runsQ scads East a dnteC I Of 66) led the lNoon IS 6.9nn 11 wnules 51$9-WI Eel a drNat. d IXQ tea Inez a Na'n 51 degrees at m riles 41 Kaen (A1• a Oist—' d I)$ SS Id; theNlf ' M 71 tgrms 15 —.1. )0 se"" East 1. Me Ow. d Late LId1eN• tn.ce sOs:.""1% dap Me teat a Ede Lyeiel( I.o tn..att knee! urn eeefene one Ld I. M-1 SouM O dgltei 76 lantern c -nets Weft. 'lap Iasi sad ml ", afIs1JK1 d 4m ld. _11 Of test. Wit, sadn.nt can. dl sae LA snmeht Id :. thence IMr% p tgrmt )I aMules 51 scams beet, slap Me s Ah IMF d tad Cee.namt Ld a allarct d I)A 41d b Mf sdultt.nl Cann d sac Cerfr n.sMl Id L theca Nam odegrees li emotesit seatds lest. rang MI —W hest d Lae Coe hd 1.eal La Cettarc e d 74 1. aO I'd b tn. pant el pq'r•:t'nR. I Rulpolel a in. 1 des[ 1, OR Me —11 hnI d taw fN 1I.Mt Ld L is essumtd t. mat WIN p 04 Y .Nnutel 51 toandt seesL 0[SCRIPTION (IF PARCEL C: Tna w d stinnesdl 1q.-Afe, et the hgeVtwesl Cee nef d +aid Geeerllr8M Ld 1. Mac. So M 0 dgrres IS rAnu 11 toa h sent, A" the line of sae Cmmnes.nt Ld K 1• a distee Ce 5111. la Id; the+ 11.11, 37 d q,- 0) .mutes 07 sa nds test, a diftact d f5. U Ito; M ece North IS de[rer I: aNetdes 51 tcatb [fsl a disl.Kr d lSR Q teS: M.K. Noun 51 dgrws a/ minutes U seeds ['d• a ei,M. d —1 ta1. thence Nosh 11 tg(.es 15 minutes )C sconds Ent to the store d Lae LtOEad; Mac. nenne.daty. slap Me seer. of Lar L)deod to the twin d toleCe.n--ALd1;th.K.Ndnh pdgrfes 16 mown R scores pest abp Inc n t a yard Cmtrneeeet Ld I to the Ran! d 6glnnifq [a ptlp" d Mis 6IXria Wes Inf room line d tad Coeernaatt Ld L is assumed to War NOnh p /grmu )r .Mute 51 leant west, I nopp C..le7 Ma this sur.e•E.a aepod oT r.+t a under sry dire) tupn riliat end tn' I e` adulp Registered Und Suree)er urea Me La.s at the Stile d Minnesde, Um this lflh dry of sfi e, .. "K R11Eted this lith eg d MaKfe. M6. E C A N, [ I[ L 0 i N 0 IN A X. I N C. Surefyort NOT[: te.lrgsNd+nerr.nsum!4 dinntself R19-stralten Me. t3T3 11aN lift L-�'�y.�:a�-•FOR- D- .77 NMIH �-�k4r . 1LIcr - •�� 3.1 � ..; �``.���k •r� J / 241 j"'�. �,•' 61..ma- E �?�S Z- a w � i � •t s �y?t:'r `^.. `�' �� �. ,y � �..v ZIA iM-- ..';T C�"`'t��M t :R� a_ - - _ ,�� ;' .' • r. a'G'"... t tCQ��. QC;,. /Zoo. �• s. .L, _.t -" i - `.;;'y ';: • .:.. ro' yam' :��Fs"'• - _ 4;. '. � -j •�t f '_t ?!� �": .r'r9': t t./ .' 2.. ..'M.\� �+1 `.. mow--...%i 1 - ,� � `l:`, ; � -ems! ;i, -• � �i�t ..i• J t s a •* Jac -d! `t.•G i♦ i •�♦ tldii `Pon ` � .,� � _ {, � ..• '�' , • w.` \a"y,\, • ems. t .`.. `` t R `Xt y - �'�.F�` �Y `� r• i �"n , i : 'wdJA � z �,' � 1, � ` h: i`�..ji\L'`` •'z F�� �'r ``:'Yj'� • a .�� �S r �',z. ��`' Y ' �` .:�► • - . w � 9'' :. �� Y t "'4t 2' ^q'�,y. '4 _ a i,=•'l,tr�♦�r � r `v�, '", ♦`V�',;�• T t � � -♦t., a y� � , \`� t � .r• �•� l Y,�y�'�+ a:-; � , ���'♦�``."w\.1,'T;`�tY.� •ta .���•,` . \. �. ' �' .'.� `may. �.; •./ln�^��yy.'l�.t� t�j � '♦�'i�^r_• .Xv�•� 1 i�.,,`.�' .,�t�N '��' �.�`.. e - �--, : �'h�'�. .?1�. .. ', t. \a.�F S JRr,_ , _ R , s v — i ��. � CO ROa© NO v tCo vwy. ALIGN - q L, C��K� ►'°s �r sy sr - 2820 goo r (V)er Utz < �E�•it •.'r roc EXNI v � JKs'' �hII SjO+NG_ YD R r . Z, Y: a 4t 938 93 ?et .. t_ Hill 4 yD - �•-B69.11.?eson ... �1 �.�� gx` �.•t AL 2870 �(� Open wolei ta fps( O 1 is � olo C^'�T F \ pI N I:PJ y, SSE. 1 0 w I F 1 !V I r jl EX H { i -sip, H! !. _.f.=- R. - S.D. we. zrs .4fC ( ....93d93Res ... ,.NC Mimi EQ 11W0 a � \ Z= R� t�tFcS , B69.17.?es. -_jz �o- lCC "WT. ALIGN 9 -.EL tAv L� Sgy y Y d/l v`' Gw L / \ Open rra/er /O �xGLLll-;; 2e20 10 ro r � f ! rr G ttoS B`! - � r LIU , I lfE vls�� / �reo1,ostTG EXH. F-Z NE „�. eA;�.0 C L �. o . zt a 4t C i 93d 93 Res WRes ... 5'D' y t.1 Pin 1imtsr 1 l •- 869.17Res. -litz t yVyV . •'��•-'$.(��KO• %td- FPS ,ILI Plop �+ '`"� �.0 rr♦ y►�tiN' �.... \ � ice- . ,fly P ED �\ OOpen rro/u ' _ r eE� t�r�stfl�' 1 REsu �T/N C� i �XK F'3 FLOWAGE AND CON ;P.I'VATION LASEtILNT AND t-:AIVZR OF DAMAGES ,. THIS INDENTURE, made and entered into this 3rd da. cf _February— _, 19 83 , by and between E1is P. I,ronby and Thomas M. Crosby heirs. ,aass�yns, successors (hereinafter collectively referred to as the Grantor (s) ) and the City of Orono, its suc- cessors and -signs, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the Crantee). IIITdIF.S:;ETII, Grantor (s), for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar (�1.00) and other valuable consideration, hereby covenant, grant, gift, quit claim and convey to Grantee the right to restrict and Grantor(s) agree to limit and preclude the use, improvement and development, under the conditions and covenants herein contained, the following described Land in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesuta: That part of Government Lot 1, and that part of Lydiard Lake which lies within the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 36, Township 118, Range 23, which lies easterly and northeaster ' of the following described line: Commencing at the northwest corner iid Government Lot 1; thence North 890 44' 42" Fast, assumed bearing, along c.ne north line of said Government Lot 1, a distance of 472.96 feet to an United States Meander Corner on the north line of said Government Lot 1, said corner being the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 570 30' 00" West a distance of 198.00 feet; thence South 140 30' 00" West a distance of 264.00 feet; thence South 610 30' 00" East a distance of 462.00 feet; thence South 730 00' 00" East a distance of 264.00 feet; thence South 610 00' 00" East a distance of 396.00 feet; Lhencc South 710 001 00" East a distance of 93.27 feet to a point in the east line of said Government Lot 1 distant 454.06 feet north of the southeast corner of saic Government Lot 1 and there terminating. as follows: 1. Grantor(s) hereby covenant and agree (s): A. No structures shall be constructed, erected, or Placed upon, above, or beneath the Land including without limitatio:1, fences, fireplaces, steps, docks, piers, hardcover or roads of any nature whatsoever, or any other structure or improvement inconsistent with the natural state of the Land. B. No trees, shruts or other vegetation shall be destro eci, cut or removed from the Land except as authorized by writter consent of Grantee. C. No earth, loam, peat, gravel, soil or any other natural material or substance shall be moved or removed from the Land and there shall be no dredging or excavation of any nature whatsoever or any change of the topography of the Land without the written consent of Grantee. D. No soil, sand, gravel or other substance or material as landfill shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Land and no waste, trash or garbage shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Land. E. No use shall be made of the Land except uses, if any, which will not change or alter the natural condition of the Land, and no use which would tend to charge the drainage, flood control, water conservation, erosion control, soil conservation, fish a,id wildlife habitat characteristics ,Fall be ma,?c of the Land or the water situated thereon. /I z F. Grantee may enter upon the Land for the purposes of /inspection and enforcement of the covenants contained herein and `o cause to be removed from the Land without any liability any structures, uses, materials, substances, or unnatural matter inconsistent with the covenants contained herein and the natural state of the Land. 2. Grantor(s) hereby grant, gift, quit claim and convey to Grantee, a perpetual flowage easement and right and privilege to trespass with water over and upon any or all of the Land. 3. Grantor(s) herein do hereby remiss, release, acquit and forever discharge, forever, the Grantee and any and all of its officers and employees of and from any and all claims, demands or causes of action of any kind or nature whatsoever which may arise or accrue by virtue of any flowage or trespass with water within terms of these agreements. In addition to any other remedy the Grantee may have, the covenants and restrictions contained herein may be enforced by injunction. Grantor(s) do not intend that the public should have any interest in the above land by virtue of this indenture or otherwise, except as hereinabove set forth. The Grantor(s) herein certify that the land herein described are free and clear of all encumbrances except: encumbrances of record. All provisions hereof shall run with the land and shall extend to and bind the heirs, successors, representatives, grantees or assigns of the respective parties hereto. % �'• a .. o. / Cam' �, � � . STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this - "y day of F • a , 19V, before me, a Notary Public wi hin and for said Count'—y and State, personally appeared Ella P. Crosby and Thomas-srosbv known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they executed said instrument as their own free act and deed. T-�� 9 Notary Public State Deed Tax Due Hereon: Exempt I+:.f NA: fN I: r! IN!• •P.f�NIN�. J:.. This instrument was drafted by: e CRrS`y POPHAM, HAIK, SCHNOBRICH, KAUFMAN 6 DOTY, Ltd. �'•.A r 4344 IDS Center, Minneapolis, MN 55402 COUNTY ( 612 ) 3 3 5- 9 3 31 me•µ• •••�N+«...�IN N`.r1f+N�rrI..J FLOWAGE AND CONSIAWATION EASEMENT AND WAIVER OF DAMAGES i a i j THIS INDENTURE, made and entered into this _ day of 19 9 by and between Thomas M. Crosby and Ella P. Crosby. husband and wife heirs, assigns, successors (hereinafter collectively referred to as the Grantor (s)j and the City of Orono, its successors and assigns, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the Grantee). WITNESSETIi, Grantor (s) , for and i•n consideration of the sum of One Dollar M .00) and other valuable consideration, hereby covenant, grant, gift, quit claim and convey to Grantee the right tc restrict and Grantor(s) agree to limit and preclude the use, improvement and development, under the conditions and covenants herein contained, the following described Land in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota: See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. as follows: 1. Grantor(s) hereby covenant and agree(s): A. No structures shall be constructed, erected, or placed upon, above, or beneath the Land including without limitation, fences, fireplaces, steps, docks, piers, hardcover or roads of any nature whatsoever, or any other structure or improvement inconsistent with the natural state of the Land. B. I;o trees, shrubs or other vegetation shall be destroyed, cut or removed from the Land except as authorized by written consent of Grantee. C. No earth, loam, peat, gravel, soil or any other natural material or substance shall be moved or removed from the Land and there shall be no dredging or excavation of any nature whatsoever or any change of the topography of the Land without the written consent of Grantee. D. No soil, sand, gravel or other substance or material as landfill shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Land and no waste, trash or garbage shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Land. E. No use shall be made of the Land except uses, if any, whic'hwill not change or alter the natural condition of the Land, and no use which would tend to change the drainage, flood control, water conservation, erosion control, soil conservation, fish and wildlife habitat characteristics :,hall 1n made of the Land or the water situated thereon. F. Grantee may enter upon the Land for the purposes of inspection and enforcement of the covenants contained herein and to cause to be removed from the Land without any liability any structures, uses, materials, substances, or unnatural matter inconsistent with the covenants contained herein and the natural state of the Land. 2. Grantor(s) hereby grant, gift, quit claim and convey to Grantee, a perpetual flowage easement and right and privilege to trespass with water over and upon any or all of the Land. 3. Grantor(s) herein do hereby remiss, release, acquit and forever discharge, forever, the Grantee and any and all of its officers and employees of and from any and all claims, demands or causes of action of any kind or nature whatsoever which may arise or accrue by virtue of any f lowage or trespass with water within terms of these agreements. In addition to any other remedy the Grantee may have, the covenants and restrictions contained herein may be enforced by injunction. Grantor(s) do not intend that the public should have any interest in the above land by virtue of this indenture or otherwise, except. as hereinabove set forth. The Grantors) herein certify that the land herein described are free and clear of all encumbrances except: all encumbrances of record All previsions hereof shall run with the land and shall extend to and bind the heirs, successcrs, representatives, crantees or assigns of the respective parties hereto. STATE OF MINN'ESOTA ) ) s s COUNTY OF NEI:NEPIN ) On this day y of Myrrh 1985 , before me, a Notary Public within and for said County and State, personnally appeared Thomas M. Crashy and Ftla P. Crosby, known to me to be the person(s) described in ana w o eyecuted the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they executed said instrument as their own free a•t and Qeed. NOTARY PUBLIC �,.. ,:..,�....�.Nwf........ State Deed Tax Due Hereon: Exempt Cy. 111-1 • l ti. IY Y. 4; . A:.Vl.ESU.A This instrument was drafted by: '.t POPHAM, IiLIh, SC:IINM?ICII, hAUFt•:T.I: & DOTY, 4344 1DS Center, tlinnc al,c)l j s, mw r°.402 • City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A METES AND BOUNDS CLASS I SUBDIVISION FOR THOMAS CROSBY - FILE 1894 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopter': subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision by Thomas N,. Crosby (hereinafter "the subdivider") of a property legally described in Exhibit A attached to this resolution; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the City, for a metes and bounds Class I subdivision, including: 1. Dedication to the City of a Flowage and Conservation Easement providing for limitations on the use of wetlands located within Parcel A as shown on the certificate of survey by Vernon A. Nickol:-, dated November 28, 1984, and revised March 18, 1985, and attached to this resolution. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the metes and bounds division for Thomas M. Crosby according to the legal descriptions shown on the certificate of survey by Vernon A. Nickol.s, dated November 29, 1984, and revised March 18, 1985, and attached to this resolution subject to the following conditions: 1. Parcel A and Parcel C, as described on the certificate of survey attached to this resolution, shall be legally combined for tax purposes by the applicant. 2. This resolution, the attached legal description and certificate of survey and the above referenced deed shall be filed with the Hennepin County Recorder's office on or before October 8, 1985. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the division has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. 1985. Adopted by the Orono City Council this 8th day of April, ATTEST: ' Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk -Mary C. Butler, Mayor Eastern Original Parcel Government Lot 1, Section 36, Township 118 north Range 23, West of the 5th Principal Meridian. Western Original Parcel That part of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section .36, Township 118 ;north, Range 23, West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying Northerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point in the West line of said northwest 1/4 of the :;orthwest 1/4, distant 759.6 feet South of the northwest corner of said Northwest 1/4 of the northwest 1/4; thence North 89 degrees 34 minutes 34 seconds East a distance of 990.71 feet; thence South 77 degrees 07 minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 357.4 feet to its intersection with the Last line of said Northwest 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 and there terminating. For purposes of this descriLtion the South line of said northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 is assumed to bear South 89 degrees 55 minutes 04 seconds West. AL for-ETING AP? 81?n5 MNO To: City Council From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator Date: March 29, 1985 Subject: #896 James N. Anderson, 2300 Fox Street - Preliminary Subdivision Application - Create two new building sites from 8.1 acre parcel Zoning District - RR-1B - 2 Acre Rural Residential Total. Parcel Area = 8.1 Acres +/- (west) Lot 1 = 3.1 +/- acres dry, 0.95 +/- acre designated wetland (east) Lot 2 = 2.1 +/- acres dry, 1.95 +/- acres designated wetland Proposed Lot Width (both lots) = 182.5' (200' width required) List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey with Proposed Division Exhibit E - Flowage and Conservation Easement The applicant is requesting a two lot subdivision of a vacant parcel noy.th of Fox Street. The total existing width of the property is 3651, hence meeting the 200' width requirement appears impossible. No additional land is available for pur- chase, hence a lot width variance is requested. While lot lines could be gerrymandered to create 200' widths at the building sites, there really seems to be no point in creating odd shaped lots in this instance. Each lot would have a lot width at the building site of 182.5. The City has approved similar subdivisions in th, past. A 2.9 acre wetland exists on the rear of the property over which a f lowage and conservation easement was granted during a previous subdivision of the property in 1977. The easement was filed with the County as Document No. 4342719 on December 19, 1977 (Exhibit E). (This information was submitted at the Plan- ning Commission meeting by the applicants.) The applicants have stated their intent to provide a single shared driveway access onto Fox Street, which is a City sheet at this location. The Public Works Coordinator has reviewed the site and notes that a shared driveway should be located not less than 50' east of the division line to maintain adequate site distance. :f each lot was to have a separate driveway, the westerly lot should have access at the southwest corner which is the crest of the road at that point. Septic testing information has been submitted for each lot. The locations of primary and secondary drainfield sites ha —� now been verified in the field by staff, and the test results indicate shallow trench drainfield systems will be acceptable for both lots. City reccrds indicate a park fee of $/50 pe.L lot was paid by a previous developer of this property in 1977. That $250 park fee _overed Lot 3, Block 1, Bill Kelley's Laad. which is now being divided into two lots. Per Code Section 11.59, Subdivisic.-i 8, the current applicants should be credited with thi- $250, hence at two lots x $200 current park fee per two -acre lot a $400, minu- the $l50 iredited is $150, or $75 per lut park fee required t,) be pair] as past of the current division. Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed two lot subdivision for James N. Anderson, finding that single family residences can be constructed on each lot meeting all the setback requirements of the RR-1B zoning district, such approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval of the septic system testing information. (completed). 2. Subject to staff review and approval of the proposed shared driveway access location (completed). 3. Subject to verification of existence of Flowage and Conservation Easement over the designated wetland areas (verified). 4. Subject to standard drainage and utility easements. 5. Subject to $200 park fee for each new lot (less $250 credit from previous subdivision). Date Rec'd 1ro2 _PS' By 40- �Feec'd C CITY OF ORONO SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM --------------•--------------,---------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name �1M<.� �� \iwn��z=x Telephone �yt\\�i\.4• Mailing Address \rtcoc \���::-t,• �.,�.." cw��rc•�'��• ;��+ :�-:�,�� \�: � `►y:'..�•.Av. � • <.. `. t...:.eS '2Sr e <s.e •�!'.�:�:. •_ � ,s._��1.�, ate,, , =3�. �\`l :' � �v l PROPERTY Name Telephone OWNER Mailing Address (Attach list if more than. one) -----------------------------------• •-------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Street Address Property Identification No. (P.I.D.) 3 C 3-\%1 Complete Legal Description to be attached to application -------------------------------------------------------------------------- EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check) Residential; no. of units C Other (specify) Present Zoning District PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only w building sites) __'i,_ Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: Existing Units New Units Z Total Units Proposed Gross Density Units per Acres Minimum Lot Size: Square Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check) k Residential Other (specify) _ !OVER) MINIMUM MATERIAL NE'CESSAJAY FOR COMPIXTE* PRE1,1MINARY API'LICA'J'JON 1. Application Completed 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can'be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 4. Stamped, legal sized envelopes ( N 10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. SignEd certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form o' security. Certification by Zoninn Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) $150.00 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivisions) $250.00 Preliminary Review $300.0' plus (Class II1 and all non-residential) 20.00/lot Final Plat Review (Class III) $150.00' ''(Plug any legal or engineering charges) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant has read the above and hereby greesto provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. ------------------------- ------->------------------------------------- Applicant's Signature �.Ci�.,,.— �.•_�- -- Date Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Mecting. Planninq Commission Meetings are usually held on the third Mondjy of c.;:ch month. .c c_ �~ ~, 4.4 I,* v f'.e5 z N 4� 70C i5 - i 'PO4 r. (A715� o (47o) 6' own 363 I. -....; i l � 570.13 - V) a s $811504 '6A, y 210.3Z 154.56 365 tL6 .. 8� _ sn 4.9 Se w i•1 .� _sue _. ._ _ - - - - - -f9X- - - 9T3 69 - - - - - - - - _5 lTxrr kw so O tog i (si fr.f o � ., l �1'Sl� s 1�f►1 1f1�' � r r- M O h I G7 N 89' g6' of E 365 I IFLowAcc I 192,5' I �I I 3 EASEMENT let's PROPOSED DIvIsIoN LINO PROPo6E0 BL06 51TES 4 j N 7 I � i I 10' W,C)r DRAINAGE i UTILITY E-ASEMENTS ON ALL 91CtS PER PLAT, I� a• Q' f V T W 0 to N kale: 1" a 1001 o denotes iron pipe marker with plastic insert inscribed "RLS 5713" Date: February 20, 1985 Preliminary subdivisio added February 21, 19L Z10. 1 4. — — 5 8:'+4q-58"W S1bq* q'59'W Fox 5T. PLPT OF BOUNDARY SURVEY for William D. Levering and James Anderson DESCRIPTION: Pit 3, Block 1, Bill Kelley's Land. CERTiFICA'E: ere v certify that this survey and plat were prepared by me 00 undo, my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Land To un(, a the State of Minnesota, Bruce R. Kelley, PE & L�.�1100'6 g, No, 5713 Total area of :.ot 3 ,a Acres. --- — -- Area In flowage eaeiment is 2.9275 Ac. N4UCE R KELLEY Nigh groun.l in east half is 2.0647 Ac. i ^•�••••�•� c«a...aa• 4 •MY Rich groan-i in west half is 3,1If34 Ac, ` %u-Vc101a _- 13.0 roe 11 �� RUN DATE 02/14/85 HEMNEPTN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION S-STEM REPORT NO. PI43S401 PROPERTY C:OdERS LIST PAGE 1 BATCH 001 38 03-117-23 32 0002 PROP ADDR 004SO WILLOW OR S 0:32ER NAME ANN L WHITE TAXPAYEP ANN L WHITE NAME/ADDR 450 WILLCW OR S LONG LAKE MN 55356 El 38 03-117-23 32 0007 PROP ADDR 02340 FOX ST OWNER H. M.E B7UCE R KELLEY TAXPAYER BRUCE R KELLEY NAKE /ADDR 2340 FOX ST OPC110 MN 55356 38 03-117-23 32 0010 PROP ADDR 00400 WILL)W OR S 06NER NAME ARTHUR J NELSON ET AL TAXPAYER ARTHUR J NELSON NAME/ADDR 400 WILLOW DR S LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 33 0003 PROP ADDR 02285 WEBBER HILLS RD OWNER NAME D i K PEDERSON TAXPAYER DEN'.JIS G t KAREN L PEDERSON NAVE/ADDR 2285 WEBBER HILLS ROAD ORONO "N 55391 38 03-117-23 34 0008 PPOP ADDR 02180 WEBBER HILLS RD OWNER NAME EDWIN W RITCHIE JR E WIFE TAXPAYER EDWIN W RITCHIE JR NAf1E/ADDR 2160 WEBBER HILL RD OR0110 MN 55391 38 03-117-23 23 0009 Willow Properties Inc Richard E Fordyce 744 Brown Rd Long Lake, MN 55356 38 03-117-23 32 0003 00440 WILLOW DR S RIC4ARD W PERRY JR RICiIARD W PERRY JR 440 WILL014 DR S LO:* LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 32 0008 INGRED K BIERMAN INCRED K DIERNAN 2740 COLBY AVE LOS ANSELES CA 90064 38 03-117-23 33 0001 CHARLES E V11 EECKHOUT VAN EECKHOUT DLOG C07P 15500 WAYZATA BLVD 41019 UAYZATA M1 55391 38 03-117-23 33 0004 02275 WEBER HILLS RD b E OLSON CARLTON D OLSON 2275 UEBSER HILLS RD WAYZATA M1 55391 TOTAL BATCH 00! 00013 38 03-117-23 32 0006 JCAN K MERRITT JOAN K MERRITT 4556 LAKE HEIGHTS ST DELL DELIE:'JEJE WA 90006 f' 38 03-117-23 32 0009 WILLIAM R KELLEY WILLIA'1 R KELLEY 2215 STINSON BLVD NE MPLS MA 55418 OF v 38 03-117-23 33 0002 02325 FOX ST ' ALVIN W LANDBERG ETAL ALVIN W LANDDERG JR L� 2325 FOX ST CRONO .?1 55356 CITY Or r( ORONO 38 03-117-23 33 0007 00680 NILLOW OR S NORMAN H THEISTE ETAL NORMAN H THEISTE 680 S 4IL1.0:4 DR WAYZATA MN 55391 1342719 FLOWAGE AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT AND WAIVER OF DAMAGES THIS INDENTURE, made and entered into this 14 TN day of November, 1977. by and between William S. Kelley, Jr., a single person, his successors and assigns (herein collectively referred to as the "Grantor") and the City of �runu, its successors and assigns, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota (herein referred to as the "Grantee"). WITNESSETH, Grantor, for and in consideration of the sun of One Doller and other good and valuable consideration, hereby covenants, grants, gifts, quit claims and conveys to Grantee the right to restrict and Grantor agrees to limit and preclude the use, improvement and development, under the conditions and covenants herein contained of the following described Land in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota; as follows: That part of Lot 3, Block 1. Bill Kelley's Land, described as beginning at a point on the east line of said Lot 3, 517 feet south of the northeast corner thereof; thence north 0' 25' SO" west to the northeast corner of said Lot; thence south 89' 46' 01" west along the north line of said Lot, 298 feet; thence south 4. 14' east, 384 feet; thence south 64. 06' 01" east, 304.09 feet to the point of beginning. Also that part of Lot 4, Block 1, Bill Kelley's Land, de- scribed as beginning at a point on the north line of said Lot 3, 77 feet east of the northwest corner thereof; thence tooth 29' 45' 01" west to said northwest turner; thence south 0' 25' 50" east, along the west line of said Lot, 517 feet; thence south 83' 06' east, 44 feet; thence north 3' 13' 15" east, 523.41 feet to the point of beginning. Also that part of Lot 4, Block 1, Bill Keiley's Land, de- scribed as beginning at a point on the east line of said Lot 4, 310 feet south of the northeast corner thereof; thence south 0. 25' 50" east along said east line, 182 feet; thence south 82' 04' 23" sett, 274.01 feet; thence north 3. 13' 25" east, 116 feet; thence north 68. 28' 03" east, 283.27 feet to the point of beginning. Grantor hereby covenants and agrees: A. No structures shall be constructed, erected, or placed upon, above, or beneath the land including without limitation, fences, fireplaces. s:ept. docks, piers, hard -cover or roads of any nature whatsoever, or any other struc- ture or improvement inconsistent with the natural state of the Land. B. No trees, shrubs or other vegetation shall be dest oyed, cut or removed from the Land except ds authorized by written consent of Grantee. C. No earth, loam, peat, gravel, soil or ary other natural material or substance shall be moved or removed from one Lani and there snall be no dredging or excavation of any nature whatsoever or any change of the 'opo- graphy of the Land without the written consent of Grantee. 1977 IV" AND P' W 10Lnk.. PAIL ♦p. Nina LO ®N D. No soil, sand, gravel or other substance or material as landfill shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Land and no waste, trash or gsrtage shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Land, E. No use shall be made of the Land except uses, if any, which will not change or alter the natural condition of the Land, and no use which would tend to change the drainage, flood control, water conservation, erosion control, soil conservation, fish and wildlife habitat characteristics shall be made of the Land or the water situated thereon. F. Grantee may enter upon the Land for the purpose of inspection and enforcement of the covenants contained herein and to cause to be removed from the Land without any liability any structures, uses, micerials, substances, or unnatural matter inconsistent with the covenants contained herein and the natural state of the Land. 2. Grantor hereby grants, gifts, quit claims and conveys to Grantee, a perpetual flowage easement and right and privilege to trespass with water over and upon any or all of the Land. 3. Grantor herein does hereby remiss, release, acquit and forever discharge, forever, the Grantee and any and all of its officers and employees of and from any and all claims, demands or causes of action of any kind or nature whatsoever which may arise or accrue by virtue of any flowage or tres- pass with water within terms of these agreements. In addition to any other remedy the Grantee may have, the covenants and restrictions contained herein may be enforced by injunction. Grantor does not intend that the public should have any interest in the above land by virtue of this indenture or otherwise, except as hereinabove ,t forth. The Grantor herein certifies that the Land herein described is free .nd clear of W. encuabraoccs. All the provisions hereof shall run with the land and shall extend to and bind the heirs, successors, representatives, grantees or assigns of the respective parties hereto. STATE OF MINNESOTA ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) William m 5. Ke I I ey q ry On this kay of November, 1977. before me, a Notary Public with- in and fo-- ,+id Cnd State, personally appeared WILLIAM S. KELLEY, JR.,%,. , - to no pe ly known, who being by me duly sworn did say at he has signed the foregu-ng instrument as his own free act ifeed. ttry v ""' VA 1 V`li i 1H15 INSTRII'ENT WAS DRAFTED BY: ul� '"y BRUCE R. KELLEY 2815 ...ytate 8o,,levard ' ` .,.....,s.. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405 l 4342719 DEC 19-77 2 719 S C003.00 "o A OFFICE OF i ;GN; Y u ME'414 PIN CxN: ccRvl f P FILES tW— n,.rty.c(n on 1971 DEC 19 pn 1: 19 S43427jS fc.. c� t �:•:.c, BY rG� �---- ,.a rcly li4lilt x rot 15 c,. a,, — A IttETING APfZ 8 To: Mayor Butler '� �����0 Council Members 0 From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date: April 5, 1985 Subject: #898 Leroy Koehnen, 3360 Shoreline Drive - Setback Variance - Commercial Site Plan Review Zoning District - B-1 Application a) Variance setback for canopy structure over existing gas pump island. Required = 35' Proposed = 26' Variance = 9' or 26% b) Commercial site plan review 1. install 10,G00 gallon fuel tank 2. install canopy over existing gas pump island east of the building 3. install a one stall car wash within the existing structure List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Site Plan Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Test of Existing Tanks Exhibit E - Engineer's Report. Exhibit F - Equipment Specification Sheet A) Variance Setback The proposed canopy will be built of the same materials used in the existing canopy and principle structure. Staff has inspected the proposed canopy location in relation to traffic flow on the site and egress/ingress from site and find no traf- fic visibility problems. The height of the ructure is well under the 30 feet height limit but still creates no visiblity problems. Planning Commission recommenus approval of the variance setback based on the above findings. Staff has drafted the necessary resolution for your review and action. B) Commercial Site Plan Review - Fuel Tank/Car Wash Two 10,000 gal Ion tanks exist on the property already and have been recently inspected (Exhibit D). one more tank is needed for the sale of super -unleaded. The new tank will be reviewed by the inspection department and installed per Municipal State Fire Code The Planning Commission has asked that the tanks and lines be inspected every 3 years. I will check with the City Engineer to see if there are legal/established inspection schedules for all gas stations rather than single mane station out that is reported to be the best service station operation in the City. I would rather see Council direct the inspection staff to commence a City wide schedule of inspections for all service stations within the City. Inspections that would assure the minimum standards of the State Fire Code are maintained and that the tanks and lines have been inspected by a certified agent. The proposed car wash will be within the existing structure. The entrance will be on the north side of the building allowing for cars to stack up and not interfere with traffic on County Road 15 or 1S. The exit will be on the south side of the building and vehicles can exit on to 15 to travel west or pass the gas pump and exit onto County Road 19 to go east, traffic flow signage should be provided. A review was done for SAC and sewer units as follows: Car Wash (Service Station) 6 SAC @$425.00 = $ 2,550.O0 6 Sewer Units = 8,070.00 $10,620.00 Planning Commission Recommendation To approve the Commercial site plan submitted by Leroy Koehnen for installation of fuel tank, canopy structure ever existing gas pump island and installation of single car wash at service station located at 3360 Shoreline Drive subject to the following conditons: 1. City must approve setback variance for canopy structure finding its placement not detrimental to the public safety. 2. New tanks installed per standards by Municipal State Fire Code. 3. Payment of $10,620.00 for total SAC and sewer unit payments with permit for installation of car wash. 4. Traffic flow signage provided on site upon completion of car wash. 5. Field tanks and lines must be inspected every three years. CITY OF ORONO i FEB 220 CITY OF OR GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION --f Y %ff -------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address G'f'-5N �' Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Please check one - Is the property '_11 abstract or torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. ----------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- APPLICANT Name ,� F Inc o �/ 1�0 E 14 nt r I`A Phone )4% - Q - %C% c/ (-%°fVw) Mailing Address 33ko 5,t4ct C9,r4r IVl4VHAel?P_ &'ln� ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OWNER Name �h'e L WAI 1& N Phone 1e k 3 5" Mailing Address 'Jn;5rj i. AAt��,i K/eanJ bed- EXc- Date Property Acquired /90 y (month/year ) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS $100.00 a) Residential accesscry Use $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 f) T.and Alteration (grading, filling) PRD/PID - see fee schedule Other Applications $250.00 Vacation $250.00 Rezoning $200.00 Appeals _ Other - see fee schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Pr Tscnt Zoning District Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST -------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603Government Center 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes ( R10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Construction plans, if applicable. 6. Plat Mar.. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please rem(,.moer that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of is/ r k owledge. r -t7X / Dat ?- Applicant's signature -� OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Coupcil members for purposes of investigation and verification of this q est. Owner's signature - �,t_... _ Date ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. :���,••�i•�.x�.� s• I��-r*;t'.' • C`a. '"�j4^�•�.��'�� 1 i�..�:�iif �•'y.-!,�"'��!-�'�:� :�=:.i �'�7�.`;.� _ • t�'t ;=.:.: SI '0111,Nno:).�e�'4• i �c ;� � •�: Ni'O :�'� :• �Wl�• 'r- '. �,_ ' _�J--fir;. :t J; ti �• ' - �; Q � ems}-••�.:••��.;,`- •tfij '•, � � _ t- ,��*4.. ►' h ♦ Y ' ;• , 1• •,: Y tip .�nv,�S ;•.. UNIONS OIL COMPANY OF CAUFOPMA tLtt AAL SCNOfLL cF MFIDSON, INC, $IoVB'roDS PCAN'..Fos ✓ ✓r r.ari � Y•:` i;. .. �� �" � 'ti ;�9+VJ.,�C'�r%� �.•~„�, �... •'•_. ,r «•r«•aa. ^p"•• "`' rj a' ..•..:� ^!- ..' •••" ..f SFr • — � \ 4p� fir• ..: ;I ;' � Jt t _�.��'?�. "A \ ' ..�_ �!—" I 1 ., a • :�� �,�, /+e �. :. .-� — ? •' (o ,y .y: �.., a M„ ,�„ -a..r.�... .. ' MO ;� 15 ' 1 `- •''aoMTY to rt r; •[ r > r ti �ifi: ; .�f,�'•' law s, %� . r�s'+ -•a �'� ""` wtctdrtinl • J•t t n )tt 42 uu a,• r UU art is ouoro 4 , �•� P 32 31 V. q �0 M - ' E' E r P• v�4p ' tl. `i soh S���.�p iA� \ (CRYSTgL BAY) _rd• ♦ O(� N—��.=,_.'• —. mart►,.,., �:$- , � �w' ' n�! %s i � � . • �r• �4ty~ •t •! �,Tt,hat' y , � .'�a " � '� rj �' I - C;�� 0r�,w,rjt'l�\\ ,, � �, ,4 �� f •..+ •��1 ' •' t-. •JLr �1r �•!� 1 ` �~ T.Y a i.� �__-- tYi / .J 1• Q,r �`,t , ��•`, u��,•*�M� l�' 11'd ', 1 i bd i�l� ��-1-fnl �+ \ r ' a �� / ti~ • r � 7• ��, r .tj1 /11a f` Y ) � •t'w• r '• .�, r / t��; i � I�� •' d% /. a •yc ,,,) ; .tl ' �� . �•� r,l\ C • r. I A 1 , r� 1�Jy1� ` r .►'��'�%✓ ,t .`:��L' �. M �. ! a. A ,... ,r• ^ s `(= � �/YJ .. � M t � . •/ i nA ; 06, 60; w. ,fw � ''` �.. �• � n �.'. �.a C � p.l �1'aa l� 11 � J r . , • • �i, / `, / • ` • `ram • — w• ti / •'(il` L .I �I e•e H dt' 1 • r • ; i II • s •y�M (►; rt y• �►•• 4•' �:,,•l1. it.;•rbr, � (A r p' 1 (s) r.�I llll I ' .A l � , !. '/ ,? 41 �' •� r .. Al't�,' ♦ t; l'"!ai�1 t✓w I I r' Y'�' �� �� .'i • f y' P7' r ,��/ Y � �. .I � A ' x •' '� �' • �(.r i ,u T�'AltA) V ' � � ` t10A 1 ♦ ` • �1}/- r "� -a • �•�• ram_.• �'! -� ' � f� ' � .e' L'" i r � , SJ J v 1 •� � •� �} ..F NM, iY,r ••'lam ♦ �� pJ ram. ' ri•1 �' _ !;r \� I •� ,� , • '� . i { ri • �1 ; • • M r/ •. •t . ��• ,,! Q'• � 1 lip GI 1 • r r A �� • i.lr " i� MVIN,NI � • J��Li ..y• _ d l �� �.. .' • r r °' •� I 0� (Il (11 Ie In :M i + .'� . �•7 . g • • f - . . (r•) ' •, N, W V1:+j1 p. ,-O`_ ! • �: �•� • . •Ir. • r r.I•• � lil Ati+l • � r r •. r. r � � f y,•• � ��'` � � • C �� . r. t r .� P { 9 .�, W i�) !1 I Is1 � Nl h !` - - • , �,�. + "'� • • r� ' � j ort•o ,•,� , I �•.: i,r hr -r _._ i Ol = i4. '•w rur ��.•. rr rl• j ,bl I` r.�r. N. �t�` 7 tt '• �• "i..� �..� I� 1ir � i•1 (.rl r.r IM ? htr' I , ' • • . M' r •--OrMw•� -••• _.._ r =e..a sl:r.;.ii --_ -�-y—_ .—� _-`_ 1"��r,�� �. i�t•. '� • i ur N � -!r try —'_T -- `��.Y. _n..u•.r,..... �� � ' ii�R �1. jib) F •••irr..w. •rr u+ /1 `FL 20.T 117,R 23 f Or i 9';:IS '-cl"iltr act i'i I•= Pli'il'ilr'3.F'•�li= � hli'ii'�ie'suta Pressure test of lines a'iid tank .'I:on 1 6 r� � �. '= F'�. 1�'' � F .a'•:•a.rr F,'a'r_m.l a.r tank is a 10000 'aa.l lore to ik. , at the of the there :'as :-iich►":= of gas i'il the tarlk. t t� r. j i t ter ?. one h i .,.k r"` t. G _• t a. t J P 1 loss �J t F r'� � = � rt ! �'11'': T t l l * f l '� i : � 1 V :•t' orle F'si Af tr r" t•}i _ test the 9-Rs i 11 the t•ayilk I.La._• 1 . 5 Bert of mod•?._. fr csi4 t h i Mol►_a.d ta.rlE: is a. 10001.3 9a.l lon t•?.'ilr. • a.t tti ' start or' the Un tAthere }ic_ Cif' '3.3 il'1 t1)e VI','. Aitef V'it: }inil.r' at ��=•1 cr•e �.ia._ ?`la=•s Of 91ia ':li of C.-I-le P'si. .mot the Gild of the te-St. t.her.. w;:._ 4c:.75 - of C+•?.s. t-e �aa., i t4 l C�_._ f' ga. f Y-nGi this t•31ik: . Li, -It test" was done with th--7- lire F,F.r�l�.l•?.r' 1171r a t►_r a. ocie hcour t.c-•_t, .at. 2C_1P=.1. thEr'e 1.17.= ?. A lqs_ Of--c�;t_, ga.l lor'_ Per Firitlr- is •?. t•i'-itit• line, thi_• l i rl_ is ti•-+}it. dolea.d l irl4- of a'lis t i in3 is ti sdh . At. this tit'l►'- i !..'aul:1 s?._ that fr orf, ai- e.-= tr.J. C+r' _ .+'.+s C orl t r t i 'I-l'4 .L e III.11 �: f r j.:, . l U O Tanks tested 3i9/84 /3a"IAW, Rai'We, f�l� d fQ�l ks s, Jitc. 2335 V. `1....i ,#,A..,., 36 & P.-J. M 33113 /)A— 612-636-9600 March 14, 1985 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN t323 Attn: Tom Jacobs Re: Our File No. ;'9-898 Koehnen Car Wash Dear Tom: (Ae. . R„nnuw. rL R�.nvl N R,ww_. P t J—PA ( 4.d.,l,A, P E R,.dto,d A ,. t—j. P t R. M,d t. kww,. P t Nov, ( lmw.. P E (.l... R (-A. P!. A -A . 6-d". P E. T *—, E .'%..'. P. E. Rr A.,d N t w.w. P F. Now, (. S, A~h' P E- .N.— f Son.A.. P t Uowld ( )"„, A 440,4 A 14.e . P t l.d A I Wd. P E Afwhd.l 1. R.r,..... P t RoAwr R ry.Jtwk. P F D—dU tmtm.. PE ( A.,M, A FmAJoe N P. fMy Hr b. M Oho. Pit �cr CITY OF ORON-0 The traffic flow plan proposed for the Koehnen Car Wash is acceptable. The plan will increase the number of cars entering onto County Road 15, but not significant enough to warrant rejection of the proposal. We did look at turning the traffic flow pattern around b,it felt that mere congestion would occur near or on County Road 15. If ycu have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK A ASSOCIATES, INC. i Glenn R. Cook GRC:sas 6583c AL AV AlWR L1. LlSU1 t, CITY OF ORONO RYKOwash Systems— W B 4 rA Nationwi3^ !'.'rah. ep,:totns, Inc. 7200 f r 612.j631 •3428 1Q Tc, ioO :ors Per Hour — An, overwhelming Sucr -#a4 RYKOwash R78 vehicle cl! dning Systems succeed becAuse they We simple to maintain, provide reliahl+ servrre, and give a superior wei., that k. 'eps custr . tiers coming br . it again and agair Whether you a ;)rival - investi „ fleet owner c- service station operator, the adr'i- tion of a totally automatic Sv' Nash system to yo,'ir iGtdtinr bring in new customers aria sub- stantially inc►els^ your profits. RYKO has o ore equipment n operation -roughout the-omitry than an) vehicle wash manu- factu• I. • basic ~•lachrne r incept has teen in opeiato`n fur r`•. •r 10 yearsl Pti ! I RYKO's commitment to cityinfe/i+ty Ulrallty, VERSATILITYI Ttr_ R78 Is the most cle ­ A-sh system in :• , .e,-ri,tl The Se'! .Cyrl- fir- You -a"I up r., �11 rsi s per ' our v. , ing each a thorougn single s^ ash cyc-,f! or, you can provide ao mat clown•- and have greater merchandising oppor- -tr­. with the double wash cycle. Art automatically and wnho�.R the added expense r•.f a-t attendantl DEPEN ILITYI 'he Oer •Ole featt,reS of the R`.'KOw;; nance , I A10y. The R " ,► St . C. Wtal _n, r1. .1 tr.o%.4un- resiste a Oro. Oct; it. system dur, , A 1A.Maft ,.,th the element, . , i .r Jed safe- guard_ the RYKOw�+sh R78 is -am- plete'ly sealed wit', a proteafve coat of high quality aircraft paint. Your customer lull Fy like the way thn seven ' ,, soi. .gushes ,if the Ri 3 RYKOwash gc ntiy yet thor- wWoly clean even hard -to -reach vs.hie'e surfaces, and they'll keep c!7;r 'ck wash after wash to in- crease yL-ur profits Leper: r'o.ble and Reliable Features Ensure Success TO 41 Y ALIT'i'S.lA1TICI The J, like it RYKOwash systems, is completely automaticl Easily installed in most bays, the R78 needs no attendant to keep it operating day in and day out. RYKO"s superior oigineering and testing guarantee only routine maintenance and repairs are gen- erally necessary. When service needed, the RYKO network of Sales and ServiLc Centers is available no- t!on%v!de to assure you prompt and qualified maintenance by factory - trained service personnel. COMPLETE ACCESSORY PACKAGES If you want a complete vehicle cleaniny system, add the RYKO Desert King II vehicle dryer and Automatic Attendant coin/token ac. tivator. For high volume locations or where security is important, the ad- dition of Code -A -Wash --with its telephone -type touch pad that Ac- cepts special code numbers —will in- sure your profits. Also, dollar bill ac- ceptorlaetivators are available. Wherever city ordinances require reuse of wail- system water, RYKO offers the must efficient reliable and simplistic reclaim system —the Environmer,talist II For the finishing touch, add Rain- maker. RYKO"s reverse osmosis rinse water treatment syaem and give customers a ?hicle finish they can be proud of. The entire line of accessories and options available for RYKOwash systems are manufactured to the highest stare! Ards in the ­+ y standards that live .;h to RYKO's reputation for i eli4 .1 RYKO sales eng.�­ •s and site designers can help y,,,. develop an efficient plan for your uperation, in- corpuiating your selention of RYKO equipment and options. Talk to your RYKO representative today about in- FULLY UNATTEP "4 COIN OPERATION stalling the RYKOwash system that is right for you. It's sure to become an overwhelming success RYKOwash R713.. . Standard Features .. . Totally automatic: operation re- quires no costly on -site attendant. 1 All aluminum frame construction resists rust and corrosion. Special soft brushes provide a gentle yet thorough wash. 0 Systems -nplified fo' -• maintenance—nu troubles draulict stems, pressure or sou ams. 0 Du. Jirect-drive motors uninterrupted operation. 1 All air, water and electric lines are suspended to protect against ac- cidental damage ' Easy access to all components for routine maintenance and re- placement Electrical systems feature both fuse and thermal overload protec- tion lily installed in most existing ate high and low voltage cumpartrnents assure safety. 1 Designed for easy entry and smooth traffic flow. 1 Underwriters Laboratories listing on all industrial contiol panels And Options... • Autolube systematically and automatically lubricates vital be,ir- ings at p. - t intervals. Select -A -Cycle ..' .vs wash cycles to be tailored to the needs of the location 1 Desert King II dryer to complete your vehicle cleaninq system. • Automatic hctendant accepts coins/tokens and activates wash autumatically Code -A -Wash may be added to Automatic Attendant to accept pre- set "code number" on telephone - type touch pad and insure efficient operation at high volume locations or where greater security is desired. Money Master accl,pts dollar bills and act:%. .wash cycle automatically • Total machi, U.L. listing is available. SPECIFICATIONS... Length 12 ft, 61n vllolr 12 ft. 3 in IN 9 ft, 5 in St:- Requirements: /%it 318*'service I 2.0 cfm 90 psi minis ium 150 psi max.mum Water I" service line 20 gpm 40 pa minimum 150 psi mal, ,, . n Electric Single Phase 20012304 60 mnp Three Phase 2001230, 30 amp. 460V. 15 arnr Minimum Bay Requirements. - Length 25 ft, 0 in Width 12 ft, 6 in Height 9 ft, 6 in For additional inform.-; and specifications, contact your local RYKO Representative RYKO Manufacturing ComFany IV AV W 11600 NW E�0-1,h Ave. 1 Grimes iowa 50111 1 (515) 986.37M • TWX 910 520.2546 ' M RYNO Wa Ulh t.-.9 Gu 1M ,lg1x 10's.h! ►pKAK111M14 11Mu,111 Of 00"m 01111pu1 - 4KO 01 oD1,991W11 1114114 SAA t 36M,00i City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.40, SUBDIVISION 6 (E) FILE NO. 898 WHEREAS, Leroy Koehnen (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 3360 Shoreline Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") anc, legally described as follow: That part of Lot 5, Block 3, Townsite of Langdon Park, described as follows: c.onanencing at a point on the South line of said Lot 5, distant 112.0 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence angle left and Northwesterly 90 degrees 30 minutes a distance of 127.6 feet; thence Northeasterly a distance of 118.95 feet more or less to the westerly right-of-way line of County Road #19 and at a point 285.0 feet Southerly of the Northerly line of said Lot 5, as measured on the Westerly right-of-way lin•! of said County Road #19; thence Southeasterly on said westerly right-of-way line a distance of 183.64 feet to the South line of said Lot 5; thence west on said South line a distance of 178.18 feet to the place of beginning. WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.40, Subdivision 6 (E) to permit the construction of a canopy structure over an existing gasoline pu-p island that will be located 26 feet from the right-of- way of County Road No. 19 instead of the required 35 feet. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minne-3ta: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File No. 898 2. The property is located in thn B-1 Retail Sales Business District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on March 18, 1985 and recommenAed approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: a) The canopy structure is high enough off the ground so that it wil not create traffic visibility problems. b) The canopy structure is to ►e placed over an existing gas pump island and if this structure was relocated so that canopy would meet the required setback, it would create serious tr-iffic flow problems for the service station operation. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. City Council has considered this application including idings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Counci 1 finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or diffic-ilty; is necessary to perserve a substantial property riqht ;.f the appli- cant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND 04;DITONS sed upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a .3ziance to Municipal Code Section 10.40, Subdivision 6 (E) to permit the construction of a canopy structure 26 feet from the right-of-way of Co.:nty Road No. 19 instead of the required 35 feet subject to the following conditions: 1. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by >lication for a building permit within one year of the date of -il approval, or this variance wil expire on that date (April )86 ). 2. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the City Council on this 8th day of April, 1985. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hal in, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor City: of: ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. STATE OF' MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this ______ ry ___ d a y of , 1985 before me a NotaPublic within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINAESOTA ) 1 s. COUNTY OF H ENNEPIN ) On this day of , 1985, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared _ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APR 81°85 To: City Council L T ORONO From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator Date: March 28, 1985 Subject: #900 James W. Ogland - Record Lot No. 38 - Big Island Variance - After the Fact Zoning District - RS (Big Island) Application - After the fact hardcover and lakeshore setback var?ances for deck and storage shed in lakeshore yard. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Hardcover Calculation3 Exhibit E - Survey Exhibit F - Sketch Exhibit G - Photos Exhibit H - Alan P. Olson Memo 9/23/83 The applicant is planning or. constructing a seasonal cabin on his Big Island property this summer. In reviewing the file for this property, it came to staff's attention that an illegal deck and small building had been constructed or. the lakeshore sometime between Summer 1982 and September 1983. Please read the memo from Alan (Exhibit H). This building, now known to be for storage, was constructed without permits in violation of the zoning ordinances. The applicant signed and returned his Automatic Lot Area Variance forms in a timely manner in May 1983. Alan held these up after discovering the work in violation. Staff brought applicant in for an after -the -fact hardcover and lakeshore setback variance after discussions regarding the access to the property indicated some form of deck may be necessary to allow safe access to the property. A narrow strip of level shoreline exists next to the lake, then a steep bank of 50-65% slope or steeper rise - to a more level plateau and building site above the lake. Applicant has stated that the shoreline is treacherous to walk on and must be traversed in order to reach the south end of the lot, where the lesser slope allows a pathway to the higher parts of the lot. The existing deck is slatted, and the applicant has stated that the shoreline is mainly sand, hence the deck may nearly meet our non -hardcover deck standards. The small storage building is 7'x8' and located about 12' from the shoreline according to the survey sketch. Applicant states that it is necessary for practical utilization of the shoreline. 1 The deck and storage building together comprise approximately 480 s.f. or 6.5% hardcover in the 0-75' zone. Since it is impossible to safely travel to Big Island at this time in order to view the site, you wi 1 1 have to rely on the photos attached; the original color prints will be at the meeting for your review. Or, perhaps you would wish to table the application pending ice -out and make an actual inspection of the site. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their March 18, 1985 meeting. and felt that there aze hardships to the property that justify granting the variance: 1. Steep slopes and the uneven, sometimes slippery shoreline terrace make access to the property difficult if not hazardous. 2. The lake access is the only viable access to the property, and in this case the decking appears reasonable to provide a safe access. 3. The 7'x 8' storage building acts as a lock box for storage of boating incidentals (paddles, lifejackets, etc) which reasonably sh-)uld not have to be carried up the hill after each use. Planning Commission noted that applicant has left virtually all of the original vegetation in place. Planning Commission recommended approval of these existing improvements based on the above fin(aings and hardship, subject to the applicant being placed on notice that no additional futti-e hardcover will be allowed in the 0-75' zone. Staff notes that there may be other Big Island properties with similar access problems which could ask for the same type of variance. A resolution reflecting the Planning Commission's recommendation is attached for your review. It would be appropriate at this time, regardless whether or not you approve this variance, to formally recognize the Record Lot/Automatic I.ot Area Variance resolution for this property (attached). 2 Jis-o H.C.Onriar-iC-.( geaiip* ;0 l!6 g3S s0 Sc+ba.c-K 0-7S' CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION $( r a ddi r Initial Application Fee $150.00 (.51.00 pc e After -the -Fact Fees (Additional $50.00 payment per -each -p ------------------------------------------------------ - ----- PROPERTY LOCATION N 0 2 5 085 Site Address LOT 2G 2Co nU2SE Z5c.'`tn.0 Ph'fvc- 0116P GRONO Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Z > -111-Z Please check one -- Is the property abstract or torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. I\:rtiCU-,tcqP d --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name J A,note 5 U). C6L,4AJQ Phone 7ri Mailing Address OWNER Name . J,*,,,, tD, C C-, L Am,'L Phone 4141 -7,f7�, _ Mailing Address _S(OC4 ) � ¢ C.St �'�2. �C-��/� ,•S7- � OCAA i 1r4 e Date Property Acq,iired 2�� Z (month/year) I (do) (d:o not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. ------------------------------------------••------------------------------- PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property P_PClZeA-r1aA.,,4 C-- Residential Other (specify) ------------•-------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ ISL7o.4Q Describe requ% n detail: Z,44e) ^,1ci QE'C4_ U EAil D k ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances ( Front Side Rear) Other 01 HARDSHIP .;100scribe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict ------=.4 -- ---------------------------------------------•------------------ DESCRIPT7;.QF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: STEZP FJyf.4yrrKenfi IV LA- —, lt /1 c c e s s A. 1? E-A -- -- -- _ --- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603Government Center 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in reviewof this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature _ �`�.�VLt� W ��^i�Gt-�t�i Date 2 - 2V- js _ OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission nemt)ors, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature —„1�a� ltJ. (.�1 Date 2 - 2 y *.5 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant must have all submit`als into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. P-anning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. RUM DATE 02/22/85 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT NO. PI435401 PROPERTY 0WNERS LIST PAGE 10 BATCH 005 38 23-117-23 23 0015 38 23-117-23 23 0016 38 23-117-23 23 0028 PROP ADDR C!::ER NAhE J A N AKERBERG J A N AKEPBERG GEORGIA PLAID ET AL Tl./PAYER JAN AK.EP.BERG JAN AKERBERG GEDIGIA RUUD NAME/ADDR 4075 HIGHWOOO RD 4075 HICH:COOD RD 13611 VALLEY VIEW PD MOUND MN 55364 MOUND N2J 55364 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344 -- 3b\ 23-117-23 23 00;W- 38 23-117-23 23 0032 38 23-117-23 23 OO7j�i� L_-� O M PROP AOOR Ct:!.ER NAME JOSEP" A MARjC J BACKES LOIS A BENTON J A A I ?SAAMAN TAXPAYER JOSEPH "A '£S ET AL JAMES W OGLA1ZD JACK A-SAAMAN I� NANZ/ADDR 3416 JIO `LA 5600 EXCELSIOR BLVD 5308 W HIGI=00 DR LV L MINNET A MN --55343 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 EDINA MN 5543. CITY 38 23-117-23 23 0035 PROP ADD,, C:::;ER NAME FRED E GILKESON TAXPAYER STEPHEN O'GARA TOTAL BATCH 005 00007 NAIIE/ADDR 116 N LINDEN ST NORTHFIELD MN 55057 t # tM000 I I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AR'D TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFC!?I'.ATICN AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECCRDS OF THE HEt-'ZPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT PFJWOPERTY TAXA CN,;TO THE BEST OF MY KIIO:JLECGE AIJO BELIEF. ' DATE '� �BY Lot A 73 ' 32:i 51 1 SO 4941 47 46 4Al 3 M, b ` 42 40 � h 31) / 1 ° 3� 7! ' 3'! (30)1 (18r •� 32 • •,°i�31 1 3 so • -'• - �-ell-_ a 0 p 26� i czi i v • •,.a,+ �? W IL BAY ST .. M. 1/M Ca Stt 23 Is F � its • � � ^ � •� � St • ?"Is IS NOT 4 I : G^t ► • t • .1 n AT• TM!% PLAT IS C0vM1-C^ IIN.+ -A."Pp .. • �. J•,.? :N T11� Ct,urf 3- � ►��-���- 23 ORONO HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET #900 LAKESHORE F%. Existing B. Existing C. Existing D. Proposed E. Proposed hardcover hardcove• Allowed SETBACK lot area hardcover hardcover hardcover percentage percents ZONE in zone in zone ((B:A) x 100) in zone H DW x 1001 Percentage 0-75' 1 3 ZAP sf — O — sf — d — % leo sf 75-250' I�t 04� sf s° sf 's % 25 250-500sf sf sf y 30 �•� 500-1000' sf sf "�� sf % 35 Directions: A. Existing Lot Area in Zone - includes the total square footage of dry buildable land within the specified zone. B. Existing Hardcover in Zone - includes the square footage of existing roofs, decks, sidewalks, driveways (gravel or paved) and other rain -impervious surfaces within the specified zone. C. Existing Hardcover Percentage - divide the number in B by the number in A and multiply by 100. D. Proposed Hardcover in Zone - includes the existing hardcover plus all proposed additional hardcover. ". Proposed Hardcover Percentages - divide the number in D by the number in A and multiply by 100. F. Allowed Hardcover Percentages - if the percentages in column E for any s•.•`)ack zone exceed the allowed percentages in column F, you should contact the Zoning Department at 473-7357 to discuss the possibilities of obtaining a variance. Generally, if a concurrent removal of existing hardcover matches the additional hardcover proposed, resulting in no net increase of hardcover in a specified zone, a variance may not be necessary. siv24g;.e StfE p = 5(a r R'"wood Deaka - of _ �"PACruq - S9A-10 sowej * G2oPosi� pw�cc Z q30 Dom. _ /So ,I �—Fxis479 415e Fj a t qb1� --//5.?9-- ?Q�•ti --231 0 Denotes Iron Monument X000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation Io0O0l Denotes Pro osed Elevation 1 � I I,/ `� UI q — ll1 - - 98. 5'8 - . ,a� 2 ± - - 1 0Q r! 1 �, ` 11• 15�'AI r '• O p -0 Denotes Direction of Surface Druinoge I hereby certify that this is a true and cullect representation of a survey of the boundaries of: Lots 25 and 26, 4Yl "- ISLAD PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesoto And of the location of all buildings, ;f any, thereon, and all visible encroorhr gents, if e iy, frof- or on said land. As surveyed by me this 9tn day of January 19 p_, Thomas S. Bergquist Registered Land Surveyor, Minn. Lic. No. AL, CERTIF QF SURVEY •` SATHAE-SEAGOIIIST. INC. /_` 40 for .»u.�v�uu•.�vo • w�.t�ulwws.+ } ta'10•nra..1A7•N,. ia6lJ�.-; �l+) ;.� •t /tir ' ' _-__�__~' ---T--7 // -v-~' - ^^ � � t ;y �� ••fit" •Y'.. -�. .yam , y� t`+i : �• q'h �_� •i � �,. _ r. -ice -. Vr ? rram�' :R%�••�,4, I' + ��� •�] �.w r.• �r-�'r •, jr A. JI 4• 4l • , - 4-W �� is ,.�-'•�. - ' � � �' ;; - - _ « •�.�•:.`. ,-+ice , •....f,.,..,�w � � � TO: JEANNE. A. MABUSTH, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR FROM: AI.AN P. OLSON, CITY PLANNER DATE: SEPTEMBER 23, 1983 SUBJECT: ISI.AND ORDINANCE, ETC. THINGS TO DO ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. RECORD LOT 149, Liljemark: see file August 3, 1983 inspection/photo shows new steps built since fall 1982 inspection on shoreline withnut permits. SEND LETTER TO REMOVE SAME along with a copy of the automatic variance when approved. Also note this house has had other quite recent addition of rooms and a large deck (within 75' of shore) which were also done without permits, probably within the last 3-4 years. Make sure they know these were violations of ordinances and that any further violations will result in citations. 2. RECORD LOT 138, Ogland: see file for photos~ -1 Has applied for automatic variance but I have not prccessed it. SEND A LETTER TO HIM. August 3, 1983 inspection revealed brand-new sauna and deck right on shoreline which was not there at all in 1982. Was built sometime in spring-surr.:ier 1983. Violats all zoning and prohibitions. No permits. tell him auto variance will not be processed 1 _ and citations will be issued if sauna not removed by ? 3. RECORD LOT 123, Kilbane: see file August 3, 1983 inspection shows new signs and other evidence that Wayzata Yacht Club is still openly using this very substandard property without a City joint use license, without sanitation etc. even after they told City that they had discontinued such use. Also Kilbane has not zeturned his automatic lot variance form or lot combo form. SEND LETTER TO WAYZATA YACHT CLUB AND TO KILBANE 1) Signage and use of property by Yacht Club violates both R5 zoning ordinance 1246 and joint use dock license ordinances 2) Continued Lse without lot area variance violates R9 zoning and jeopardises rights to add on or maintain existing cabin. 3) Lot area variance would be automatically granted if: a) he returns forms b) he combines lots (2nd form) c) he clears up Yacht Club matter butt no action on this if Yacht Club use isn't either discontinued or broight up to code foi sanitation, etc (which would be very different) 4) Also for Kilbane, separate matter, he should also return variance form for RL 114 which would be approved if he sends form. 2 C Cite of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. APPROVING A LOT AREA VARIANCE FOR RECORD LOT NO_*3,?' _ PURSUA14T TO ORDINANCE NO. 246, SECTION 34.366 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Hennepin Col.tlty, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. That j6Mc..5 W• OC-11_A-ND —.is (are) the owner(s)/taxpayer(s) of record of the following; described pro, erty located within the RS Seasonal Recreational Zoning District of the City: Lot:: 25 and 26, I46rse Island Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota 2. That in adoption of Ordinance No. 246, the City Council reviewed ownership, development and use patterns on the islands and has determined that all the above described property combined is and shell 'hereinafter and henceforth be one "RECORD LOT" as defined. in Section 34.366 of said ordinance. 3. That all the above described property when combined as one RECORD L')T is still less than the minimum lot size required for new lots ii. the RS Dis�rict, but that r.his RECORD LOT is being used and/or may be used in the future for any permitted use in the RS District without adverse affect upon public health, safety, or welfare. rovrT 114ZTWJ The City Council of Orono hereby grants a lot area variance to the above described RECORD LOT based on the above findings and.: subject to the following Conditions: 1. This RECORD LOT including all the above described property combined shall henceforth be continued in common ownership by the same person or persons even if recorded as separate lots or tax parcels, and it shall not be subdiviued, sold in parts, reduced in area or otherwise separated without application for and approval of a subdivision by the City. This condition shall not preclude future sale or transfer of the complete "RECORD LOT" as a single unit. 2. Granting this variance means this RECORD LOT may be used for one - family seasonal recreatioral use without a structure; or a single new seasonal dwelling may be built; or an existing seasonal dwelling may be used, improved, added -onto or replaced; all without requiring further City Council review of lot size, but subject to strict comp- liance with all building permit, setback, hardcover, on -site sewage treatment and other performance standards for development in the RS District. PAGE 2 ; RECORD LIST NO. ,3g : RESOLUTION NO. 3. Granting this variance shall not vest any rights in the property other than as specifically provided in Ordinance No. 246, and shall not preclude a future City Council from amending, modifying or other- wise liniting development rights and/or performance standards in the RS District. 4. The undersigned has read and understood the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, agrees that the above described property constitutes a single RECORD LOT; agrees that the RECORD LOT use may be so limited by the City; and agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on the day of ATTEST: City Clerk (1) J14Me5 U). (2) Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF ORONO Mayor 1983. On this /7 day of�, 19 di , before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, pe onally appeared W- (49:2� and who executed the foregoing known to me to be the person(s) described in instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and AA4 ROBERT E. ROFIDAL NOTARY PUBLIC • MINNESOTA NOTARY PUBLIC HENNEPIN CQ INTY gn MyC�s�`""'"OYtI.I MY COMMISSION EXPIRES x Inn This document is being recorded for the benefit of the City of Orono per Minnesota Statutes 386.77. State Deed Tax Due Hereon: Exempt This instrument was drafted by: City Of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn. 55323 473-7357 • 3 CITY of ORON ;,�__ . j 1'41111 Office flux 660 Crystal Bay. hLnnesola 55323. lfunicip;d OfGres i.. �. On the North Shore o/ Lake Afinnetunka PLEASE COMPLETE AND RETURN THIS FORM TO THE CITY OF ORONO in the attached postage -paid envelope. Doing this will result in combining your separate tax parcels into one parcel for assessing purposes consistent with the current RS zoning. TO: Vernon T. Hoppe Finance Division Director 603 Administration Tower Government Center Minneapolis, Mn. 55487 DEAR SIR: 3- _-i^ ,1983 please date) I HEREBY MAKE A REQUEST FOR A COMBINED ASSESSMENT ON THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LAND (all of which combined are identifed as Orono Record Lot No. .3 F ); a3 - //7 - ;Z 3- 2F3 aoi/ CITY N0. 38 FOR 1983 TAX YEAR Signature of Fee Owner W. pe(4�114 Signature of Taxpay (if different) <o0b E_k C e-(_-154Vy?_ 66W a_t4 CA Taxpayer's Mailing Address (OFFICE USE ONLY) COMBINED CURRENT VALUES H OR AGR•' W_"'_� rLAND BUILDING MACHINE TOTAL FULL TOTAL N. H. :I'•: = AND TRUE ASSESSED IVIL DING A 473.7357 0 AUSIMISTRATIOk A FIXAXCI' - 473 M11 • PUBLIC UORKS - 47) 7)59 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 'RANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 AND 10.31, SUBDIVISION 9 - FILE. #900 WHEREAS, James W. Ogland (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of property located on Big Island and designated 3s Big Island Record Lot No. 38, within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lots 25 and 26, Morse Island Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for after -the -fact variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.55, Subdivision 8, and 10.31, Subdivision 9, to permit the construc- tion of a deck and accessory storage structure located within the 0-75' setback area, which structures comprise 480 square feet (or 6.5%) hardcover where no permanent or temporary structures or hardcover are normally allowed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #900. 2. This property is located within the RS Seasonal Recreational Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on March 18, 1985, and recommended approval based on the following findings: a) The property has a substantial hardship in that the steep topography and uneven shoreline terrace make access to the property difficult and posssibly hazardous. b) The property is not served by a developed road and the lakeshore is the only access to the property. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. c) The severe topography presents a hardship which justifies the use of a storage structure near the lakeshore rather than uphill. 4. The applicant has stated that the decking is under- lain by sandy material and boulder rip -rap, has no plastic sheeting or other impermeable material. which would retard infiltration, and will remain in this condition permanently. 5. The applicant has allowed the natural vegetative screening to remain on the site. 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findinqs and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety, and welfar.2 of the community. 7. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that gr=nting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or dif- ficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keep- ing with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants an after -the -fact variance to Municipal Code Sections 10.55, Subdivision 8, and 10.31, Subdivision 9 to allow construction of a deck and accessory storage structure located within the 0-75' setback area, which structures comprise 480 square feet (or 6.51) hardcover where no permanent or temporary structures and no hardcover are normally allowed, subject to the following conditions: City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1. The deck structure may never be underlain with materials which would decrease the permeability o: the land below the deck, nor shall it be enclosed, covered, or altered in any way so as to become hardcover. 2. Applicant is placed on notice that no future hard- co,.c,r variances will be granted for this property, and no . variances are granted at this time. 3. iorities granted by this variance run with the prop, , y not with the owner, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the dote of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (April 8, 1986). 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 8th day of April, 1985. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Property Owner Property Owner Mary C. Butler, Mayor Spouse Spouse +6 - _ 1IL NOW 1,PR 81? 5 To: Mayor Butler Council Members ON From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date: April 3, 1985 Subject: #901 Karl F. Johnson, 3393 Crystal Bay Road - Variance Application - Variance a) Section 10.60, Subdivision 13, storage of boat over 20 feet in length within 15' to 20' of street. and less then 10' from side property line in a location that provides no screening from neighboring properties and within lake view of west property owner. b) Section 10.55, Subdivision 8, no filling or excavation within 75' of lakeshore or installation of permanent structures - The applicant has placed gravel over approximately 440 square feet of an area located within 75 feet of the lakeshore and has placed a section of a retaining wall within 65' to 67' of the lakeshore. The specific section of retaining wall is 3 feet high at its highest point and stepped down as it approaches the lake. The wall is six inches wide or the width of a railroad tie. List of Exhibits Exhibit. A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Letters From Crystal Bay Residents Exhibit F. - Wheeler Letter 2/23/85 Exhibit F - Carl. Letter 3/8/85 Exhibit G - Inspection Notice ll/l/82 Exhibit H - Site Plan - Hardcover Calculations Exhibit I - Wheeler Memo 3/14/85 Exhibit J - SJ-e Letter 3/5/85 a) Violation of Section 10.60, Subdivison 13 The applicant advises that for his specific property, this is the only area available to store his boat of 25'. The east side of the paved drive is the only formal yard or grassed area in the front yard. The west side of the yard has never been formally landscaped. The applicant has advised that half of the gravel area that lays between the paved drive and west property line is the bed of an old gravel drive that served the house to the west. The remaining portion (area adjacent to retaining wall) was never able to sustain adequate ground cover because of the erosion from the steep back to the north. The applicant has listed the following hardships in his application for a variance: 1. Narrow lot and location of adjacent homes and improvements. 2. Steep topography to rear of home made back of lot inaccessible. 3. Location of access road. I have asked the City Attorney for his opinion concerning the singling out of one individual for violation of an ordinance that is violated by many in our community. The Attorney has advised that if the City received complaints because neighbors have not been able to resolve the problem that we must enforce the standards of the ordinance. The singled out violator is provided due process by providing the mechanism - the variance application - to present his position. If staff refuses to enforce an ordinance, the complaining, neighbor can file an appeals application challenging the City staff's int;rpretation of an ordinance or refusal to enforce an ordinance. For this review, as with the Eller review, the fact that surrounding neighbors are also in violation of Section 10.60, Subdivision 13 is not relevant. The boat cannot be stored on Johnson's property and meet the standards of the code. The Planning Commission was asked to consider the following alternatives in dealing with the boat storage issue: If Planning Commission finds the hardships valid ones, and can make the necessary findings as set forth in Section 10.08, Sub- division 3 (A), vote to recommend approval. If it is your position that the hardships claimed by the appli- cant are not valid and that no boat no matter what size should be stored less than 10 feet from the side lot line of the Lake- shore/front yard of an adjacent home owner, vote to recommenI denial and ask that the boat not be stored at this location in the future. If it is your position that the code needs to be amended, would an amendment help Mr. Johnson's dilema? I have listened to many proposed amendments of this section of the code for the past month but not one proposed amendment recommended storage of mobile material 10 feet from the side lot line of a lakeshc;re yard. The intent of all the performance standards for lakeshcre use is to protect the view of adjacent lakeshore homeowners. b) Violation of Section 10.55, Suhdivision 8 - Placement of gravel and construction of retaining wall. I. Placement of Gravel The applicant has placed gravel over existing ground cover - as stated above the applicant claims about 200 square feet of that was original road bed. The neighbor to the west submitted photos for the review (available for review at meeting), taken prior to his residency that would dispute Johnson's claim that the house to west was served by a drive that intersected Johnson's front yard. I don't know the date of the pictures but the gravelled area was already installed. Johnson ad%ised that when he placed the gravel on the subject area that he did not place plastic sheeting underneath but that he placed it over existing ground cover. Staff advised the Planning Commission of the recent findings made by Council in the Johnson application on Fagerness Point where gravel placed on existing grade or over perforated plactic sheeting for landscape purposes was not considered hardcover. Planning Commission could not make the same findings in this case because the gravel placement in the final analysis was used for the parking of a boat and a vehicle - similar to graveling of drives. The gravel interacting with the natural clay rase from pres- sil-e of parked vehicles creates hardcover. 2. Construction of Retaining wall Portions of the retaining wall are located within 75' of the lakeshore - as noted above an 8 -o 10 feet strip 6 inches wide extends lakeward up to approximately 6.,' from the lake. That sectioi of the structure now covered with snow but from memory did not appear to be structurally relevant to major retaining wall that suppcits the earthern bank on west side of mouse. I have enclosed a site inspec- tion notice from 1982 that would somewhat date the original examina- tion of that earthern bank and an attempt on the part of the applicant to use the fill along the shoreline. At that nspection the applicant was advised by both Olson and Jacobs to erect a retaining wall to sustain the eroding bank. Prior to the wall construction, Johnson claims the heavy rains would wash mud and sediment down over the now graveled area directly into the lake. The gravel was placed over the area prior to the wall construction. Johnson stated that he would remove the section of wall within the 75' protected area but I suggested he wait for Council's decision. The location of the wall and bank excavation are out of the 75' protected area. It would appear staff had resolved the fill along the Lakeshore in 1982. Planning Commission Recommendation A) Placement of Gravel To deny the after -the -fact hardcover variance application by Karl Johnson, at 3393 Crystal Bay Road based on the following findings: 1. No evidence that a driveway ever existed on the Johnson property that served the house to west. 2. The gravel as placed and used is considered hardcover. 3. Applicant placed hardcover within protected area without the required variances. The recommendation for denial is subject to the following conditions: a. Al 1 hardcover (grave 1 ) within 0-75' setback must he ru-moved and replaced with suitable ground cover. b. Additiorai hardcover within 75-250' setback area created by placement of subject gravel to also be removed and replaced with suitable ground cover because these already exists an excess of 6% hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. B) Retaining Wall To approve the after -the -fact hardcover variance of 6 squar- feet created by the extension of a retaining wall within the 0-75' tback area based on the following findings: 1. The major portion of the retaining wall is out of the n-75' setback area. 2. The retaining wall serves to control erosion. 3. Applicant was advised to erect retaining wall to sustain eroding bank in 1982 by Orono staff. C) Boat Storage To deny a variance for the storage of a boat 25 feet in length placed 20 feet off street right-of-way and less than 10 feet from the side property line based on the following findings: 1. Applicant has not demonstrated sufficent hardships. 2. The storage of a 25' boat in a lakeshore yard is in complete conflict with the intent and standards for use of lakeshore property within the City. Council Action Direct staff to draft the appropriate resolution for formal action at your April 22nd meeting. I CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional project) After -the -Fact Fees 4ca-, ------------------------------------------------------------ -- - - PROPERTY LOCATION -► Site Address ` o �%��%' �,�•��_,-�,.,'_ Property Identification Number (P.I.D. a3 qq o0a0 Please check one -- Is the property - abstrac`._ or torrens? Please attach legs 1 description to application if not included on required survey. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name Phone _ / 7/ Mailing Address =� = ; ✓''1 �4 �� ✓ -0_Q6uUja, -------------------------------------------------------------------------- OWNER Name �� 1 /_� Phone W /- Mailing Address Date Property Acq:.ired ,�• (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjar,.it parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property [,-- Residential Other (specify) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: il% ' i- F -r.j It L —I R I. /. ; Ti 'ji , r VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width ✓ Hardcover Setback Variances ( Front Side fear) Other"+�# - (OVER) HARDS113 P Describe undue hardship or practical enforcem�Je'nt of. zoning regulations: ., a�•, difficulty resulting from strict j'((' 4e, LL 4C4 f /( C_ % --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe .�iusual property conditions preventing complianc,_ with 'Zoning Code Requirements: _ S 6V, a 4,1 A6o UE REQUIRED SUBMI7-TALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603Government Center 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. The Applicant- and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. --------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certif ies that the information supplied is tree and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature _ Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the rroperty by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of thin request. A Owner's signature �'t &" Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. co RUN DATE 02/27/85 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT NO. P1435401 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PAGE 12 BATCH 004 38 17-117-23 43 C116 FRO? DDR U3407 CPISTAL DAY RD C::"ER tIAME R S A E C NIZHOLS T:.:•.PAYLR ROBERT S S EUI4ICE C NICHOLS I,At:E/AC-nR 3407 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN' 55391 38 17-117-23 44 OC19 P'30? 11007 03385 C:1'STAL SAY RD CZ.ER Na!E C A D CARL TAXPAYER CHARLES R & DONNA C CARL NAM-c/AJDR 3385 CRYSTAL DAY RD ORONO YN 553?I 30 17-117-23 44 OCZZ F30P ADDR 03405 CRYSTAL DAY 'ZO C:'.;ER NAME JOE OARLIi::, ETAL TAY.PAIER J D DtRLING NAN.E/AD2.1 3- 05 CRYSTAL BAY POt.D .JAYZATA 11A 5539: 38 17-117-23 44 00:7 03369 CRYSTAL BAY RD J B DAHLM'.N & M A D..;:LMAN JO.4 W PAPAS 3369 CRYSTAL DAY RD WAYZATA IN 55391 36 17-117-23 44 0020 03393 C9fSTAL BAY PO 6; F JC;Rt SO;: & S A JOHNSON KARL & SHERI JOSNSON 3393 CRYSTAL DAY kO I:AYZATA 1:1 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0025 022115 BAYVIEW PL BARS ARA J SIPP?.ELL EAR 3..A J SIP, TELL 2205 BAYVIEW PLACE WAYZATA KU 553SPI 17-117-23 44 0010 75 CRYSTAL BAY RD JAY 5 KEISEZ ETAL JAY B KEISER 3375 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA f!!t 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0 '1 0:399 CRYSTAL BAY RD SANDRA K CECR3E St.1TRA K GEORSE 3399 CRYSTAL BAY PC-'C MINttETOIW,A LEACH rN SS391 38 17-117-23 44 02200 BAYVIEW DALE MATSON ETAL DALE MATSC•N ETAL 2200 SAYVIEW PLACE WAYZATA MN 553" P.^:OP ADDR �of �^`6� 1 TA?:PAYER TOTAL BATCH 004 00009 ; ADD:i 1 S I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REF3ESENTED APE AN ACCURATE A!'D TP.UE REPPEC_ttTATIGN OF INFGRMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HLt 1EPIN COUNTY DEPt..?TMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY K,;O:ILEOGE A;;O BELIEEF. `1� 1 ` • I y POPO �jt` N cog �`o'�'J ti c� .•� } 5 ` `'' �ti i! � r 1. .. 3 , r •� el 63 - 14 62 63 i4,4. ' n fa Ioll s P too 54ti ,to/ •t 2 )�y: A0 ST ' 51. ►•�� ti'1 12 4 ,� '23 "� EK• (11�� � ,+` 32�iY .�? lilt ;� 33 �11 J(S �,) ,' 2• �.c '- .r �/ l � I�` r. Cep :��.r 14 U. IV 1,j1 !6 ,: 411 lop +, ;, 21 J. ��•l`y fr L v Ci�r all , �:u3I ark a�:' � - . -• h,o P t, totip to too i-' tiayor Hary Butler City of Orono circ'no F1rr. Dear Mayor But I er, IV l�l I�I FU Ll' _ CITY OF OEZ�fC� ; This is in reference to the city ordinance gcwerning the storing of boats, trailers, docks, etc. on residential lots. Because of the physicol problems of many of the lots on Crystal Bay Rd., 0.e.; narrow lots, closely spaced houses, ineccessable rear yards, a road along the Iakeshore, etc.? it is almost in-rpossible for the residents to compiy with the ordinance as it is now written. As one drives along other lakeshare areas of Orono, it becorrres evident that rnar►g other people hAve the sarne problern. The lake is the basis for a great deal of recreational activity all near, consequently, a great deal of equiprnent ( boats, snowrnobiles, doc.l:s, etc.1 is accumulated by the residents. In view of this, I urge the city to amend the ordinance so that it more closely addresses trre needs and iirrnitions of the citizens of Orono, and specrfic:aily the prablerns of Crystal bail Rd. residents. Respectfuliy, i f ,.Z xw 72 A ) r A -7Lo/ A, /K2 S� � /�' Z�� '%Yor I'lirry but Citu of Orono Orono Mn. Dear Hd'lor Butler, / )'/ L-A-t4,& l j j y '17 D) This is in reference to the city ordinance governing the staring of boats, trailers, docks, etc. on residential lots. Because of the physical problems of many of the lots on Crystal bay Rd., O.e.; narrow lots, closely spaced houses, inaccesshble rear yards.; a road along the, lakeshore, etc.) it is almost impossible for the residents to comply with the ordinance as it is now written. As one drives along other Iekeshore areas of Drono, it becomes evident that many other people have the same problem. The lake is the basis for a great deal of recreational actwity all year, consequently, a great deal of equipment ( boats, snowmobiles, docks, etc.) is accumulated by the residents. In view nf this. ! urne the ciU,i to Amend the ordinance so that it more closely addresses the n^ As and iimitions of the citizens of Orono, and specifically the problems of Crystal Bay Rd. residents. Respectf k" IL P4- 5 l985 CITY p 0 0 Iloyr:,r HerLl But ler- r_ity of ilrrino Orarlcr 111). [)?at- Hepor Butler; r C�CSC�D�IC�r,, j. CITY ov This is in reference to the city ordinance governing the storing of boats, trailers, docks, etc. on residential lots. Because of the physical problems of many of the lots on Crystal Bay Rd., {i.e.; narrow lots, closely spaced houses, inaccessoble. rear yards, a road along the lakeshore, etc.) it is a!nlost impossible for the residents to comply with the ordinance as it is now written. As one drives a!ona other !akeshore areas of Orono, it becornes evident that many other people have the same problem The lake is the basis for a great deal of recreational activity all year, consequently, a great deal of equipment ( boats, snowmobiles, docks, etc.) is accumulated by the residents. In view of this, I urge the city to amend the ordinanwe so that it more closely addresses the needs and iimitions of the citizens of Orono, and specifically the probier'rrs of Crustal Bay Fd. residents Respectful!!_; 3325 CRYSTAL BAY RD. WAYZATA, MN 55391 10 E Mayor Mary Butler City of Orono Orono lln Dear Mayor But!er. --------------- I FM25iq,6 L CITY GF This is in reference to the city ordinance governing the storing of boats, trailers, docks, etc. on residential lots. Because of the physical problems of many of the lots rin Crystal Say Rd., 0.e.; narrow lots, closely spaced houses, inaccessible rear _yards, a road along the lakeshore, etc.? it is almost impossible for the residents to comply with the ordinance as it is now written. As one drives along other Lakeshore areas of Orono, it becomes evident that many other people have the same problem.. The lake is the basis for a great deal of recreational activity all year, consequently, a great deal of equipment ; boats., snowmobiles, docks, etc.? is accumulated by the residents. In view of this, I urge the city to amend the ordinance so that it more closely addresses the needs and irrrritions of the citizens of Orono, and specifically the problerns of Crustal Bay Fed. residents. RespertfiiI ly, ti ., IL 'If il 0 i1agor 11ar-.1 Butler FtrFB City of OrcinoOrono Mn. 5 1985 DeSr i15uor Butler, ��- ' ��„L�� ; This is in reference to the city ordinance governing the storing of boats:, trailers, docks, etc, on residential lots. Because of the physical pr'_lblems of many of the lots on Crystal Bay krd., (i.e.; narrow lots, closely spaced houses, inaccessible rear yards, a road along the lakeshore, etc.) it is almost impossible for the residents to comply with the ordinance as it i5 now written. As one drives. Along other lakeshoro ;seas of Orono, it becomes evident that manu other people have the same problem. The lake is the basis for a great deal of recreational activity all year, consequently, a oreat deal of equipment ( boats, snowmobiles:, docks, etc.) is accumulated by the residents in view of this, I urge the city to amend the ordinance so that it more closely addresses the needs and limrtion,s of the citizens of Orono, and specificallu the problems of Crystal 66L`i Rd residents. Respectfully, 1LlStC�%C.2--szt/�� I#! 11epor Mary Butler City of Orono Orono Mn. Dear Mayor Sutler; I FEB I ail1 2 61985 i This is in reference to the city ordirance governing the storing of boats, trailers, docks, etc. on residential lots. Because of the physical problems of rr,rjrry of the 1CItS on Crystal Bay Rd , 0 e ; narrow lots; closely ::pac&d houses rnycceSsable reer- yryrds:, a road along the lakeshore, etc: ) it is ,dh*ortst in.possitile for the residents to comply with the ordinance as it is now written. As one drives along other lakeshore areas of Orono, it becoms evident that many other people have the same probiern. The lake is the basis for a great deal of recreational activity all year, consequently, a great deal of equipment ( boats, snowracibiles, docks, etc..' is accumulated by the residents. In view of this, i urge the city to amend the ordinance so that it more closely addresses the needs and l i rni t i ons of the citizens of Orono, and specifically the problems of Crystal Say Rd. residents. Respectful lu, D I layor Mary But. ier- City of Orono C rr'ar10 Mr1. Dear Mayor Outler; rFi-,2G1985 0RC',N0 This is in reference to the city ordinance governing the storing of boats, trailers, docks, etc. on residential lots. Because of the physical, problerns of rnany of the lots on Crystal Bay Rd., (i.e., narrow lots, closely spaced houses, inaccessible rear yards, a road along the ►akes:hore, etc.) it is almost impossible for the residents to comply with the ordinance as it is now written. As one drives along other lakeshore areas of Orono, it becomes evident that many other people have the some problern. The lake is the basis for a great deal of recreationa! activity Ail year, consequently, a great deal of equipment ( boats, snowrnobiles, doers, etc.) is accumulated by the residents:. In view of this, I urge the city to amend the ordinance so that it more closely addresses the needs and limitions of the citizens of Orono, and specifically the problems of Crystal Bay Rd. residents. Respectfully, Ze -j tt—lfc� -f 19 Mayor 11.iry But I er City of Orono FEB 2 7 19 75 Orono Mn. i CITY OF NONIO Dear Mayor Out ier, This is in reference to the city ordinance governing the storing of boats, trailers, docks, etc- on residential lots.. Because of the physical problems of many of the lots on Crustal Bay. Rd., (i.e.; narrow lots, closely spaced houses, inoctes,.able reer tiords, a road along the lakeOore, etc.) it is almost impossible for the residents to coi iplq with the ordinance as it is now written. As one drives along ether lakeshore areas of Orono, it hecomes evident thnt many other people have the same problem. 'rho lake is the basis for a great deal of recreational activity all year, consequently, a great deal of equipment ( boats, snowmobiles, docks, etc.) is ac:c: mulated by the residents. In view of this, I urge the city to amend the ordinance so that it more closely addresses the needs and !imitions of the citizens of Orono, and specifically the problems of Crystal Bay Pa. residents. Respect ful1q.. r� t _/ Ilhr►.t Butler � p City (if Orono � �-- 0rono 11n. I FU 2 Clear Mayor Bo 1pr, —IT - ; - DOF This is in reference to the city ordinance governing the storing of boats, trailers, docks, etc. on residential lots. Because of the physical problems of many of Me lots on Crystal Fray Rd., 0.e.; narrow lots, closely spaced houses, inaccessable rear yards, a road along the lakeshore, etc.) it is almost impossible for the residents to comply with the ordinance as it is now written. As one drives along other lokesh►ore areas of Orono, it becomes evident that many other people have the sarne problem. The lake is the basis for a great deal of recreational activity all year, consequent ly, a great deal of equipment ( boats, snowmobiles, docks, etc.) is accumulated by the residents In view of this, I urge the city to amend the ordinance so that it inure closely addresses the needs and limitions of the citizens of Orono, and specifically the problems of Crystal Bay Rd. residents. Respect ful,ly, 1 `•'W 1 jV Mayor Mary Butler. City of Orono Orono Mn. Dear Mayor But I er: ' i It�828 1985 E,Li, CITY OF ORONO Thics: is in reference to the city ordinance governing the storing of boat:, trailers., docks, etc. on residential lots. Because of the physical problerris of niany of the lots: on Crystal Fray Rd., (i.e.; narrow lots, closely spaced houses, inaccessable rear yards, a road along the iakeshore, etc.) it is almost impossible for the residents to comply with the ordinance as it is now written. As one drives along other lakeshore areas of Orono, it becomes evident that many other people have the s.3me problem. The lake is the besis for a great deal of recreational activity all year, consequently, a great dea! of equipment ( boets, snowmobiles, docks, etc) is accumulated by the residents. In view of this, I urge the city to amend the ordinance so that it more closely addresses the needs and limitions of the citizens of Grano, and specifically the problems of Crystal Bay Rd. residents. Respectfull", February 21, 19H5 To the Residents of Crystal Hay Road, The petition distributed by Mr. Carl and Mr. Siakel points out that "a great deal of equiptment (boats, snowmobiles, docks, etc.) is accumulated by (a few) residents" and is Indeed stured in frer+t yards. But, to amend the ordinance is TOTALLY UNNECESSARY AND t1AY PROVE TO BE 111GIeLY DETRIMENTAL. TO OUR CO111UNIT'Y. You already know that the city ordinance, as it is, does allow for variances where residents have an ACTUAL 11;RD5HIP. History has proven that the city is not blindly and strictly enforcing this storage ordinance. They normally only get involved upon a specific complaint. Where there are .inaccessable back yards, I am in agreement with the general intent of this petition BUT, LET'S NOT OPEN THE FLOOD GATES. Let's all con- tinue to work toward a clean neighborhood ---- FOR EVERYONE. If a resident has an ACCESSABLE back yard; HE SHOULD USS IT. Even now a few people dump "items" in their front yards for all to look at even though they have accessable back yards. Sheer inconvenience should not :re an excuse for anyone to encourage the decay of our neighborhoods appearance. In any case, should a person with an inaccessable back yard be allowed the uncontrolled storage of as much miscellaneous "stuff" In his FRura yard as he may want? As this can poteirtially get out of hand, WE MUST 11AVE CONTROLS. Our present ordinance does serve that purpose while still considering true hard- ship cases. If you still fee' tAat you want our cur- rent protections weakened, PLEASE., Af LEAST, AMEND THIS PETITION mro RE YOU MAIL IT. Reflect your honest concerti for our neighborhoods appearance by adding a footnote stating that "IF A PERSON HAS AN ACCESSABLE LACK YARD, HE SHOULD USE IT"1 Si core i �rs,� Je r �W eeler 33 C ystal Bay Rd. 3385 Crystal bay Rd (n� FW.j 2 lei `I w.ayzata fin 55391 ill\ 1�-� March b 1995 [�6jTy0j?ON Members, Planning Commission City Council City of Orono Dear Members, As I'm unable to personally attend this meeting I'm writing this lettor in reference to agenda itern 1901 concerning Hr vori .►ohnson My wife and ! live at 3385 Crystal Bay Rd. and Mr Jof , ison is our next auui- neiq_hbor. After reading the agenda iterns it is obvious that variances are being required on two different ordinances One, a Maid :over situation within 75' of the lake and the other, a boat storage req_ulation Let me first address the hardcover situation The area in question was orginally part of a driveway that serviced the residence which is now owned by Ms Sandra George. The rest was added to alleviate the mud problem after the area was leveled The city was aware of the wh.)le affair They tagged Mr .Johnson for improper disposal of the dirt on the lakeshore The situation was taken care of by Mr Johnson to the city s satisfaction and was considered closed The Planning Cornrr�ission was also aware of the situation and during a hearing on the plant, for the redoing of Ms George's house, reminded Mr Johnson to be sure to get a retaining wall in as soon as possiole I was present at that meeting with Mr Johnson and I heard it No mention was made by anyuody, Planning Commission or City Offical, of a hardcover violation or any other violation for that n-13tter, except the one previously mentioned Now, because of a vicious and unrelenting verbal and written campaign against butte Mr Johnson and the City, undertak.2n by a tenant in the George house, the City has decided to require Mr Johnson to get a variance for the area in question. This simply is not fair if Mr Johnson is guilty of a violation then the City is quilty of neglect for not correcting it when they first knew about it At this late (late, to be fair to r1r Johnson, the subject should be dropped with no further action taken The boat pr oblem is a different matter altogether Mr Johnson is being required to get a variance to an ordinance which is violated by almost every lakeshore resident in Orono I myself violate it twice and as you walk down Crystal Bay Pd you see many other vvilators, including one mernber of the Planninq Commission If you drive along the lakeshore areas of the City marry more examples of violations are obvious The fact of the matter is, the ordinance, as it is now exists, is not enforcable and should !.a �rnnr.rlc.rl Tn c"inx.ra ciir►. 3c lhic "rz-ca of the complaint of one new neighbor, who is unfamilier with and unresponsive to the established traditions of the neighborhood, is not fair. If the opposite situation existed, that most everyone was in compliance, it would then be a different story. This is not the case here. If the City chooses to require W. Johnson to apply for a variance they had better start requiring everybody who violates this ordinance, including myself, to apply for one. There are no provisions for selective enforcement and there is no mention of "the spirit of the law". In view of the above, and because of the existance of a petition asking the Council to amend the ordinance in question, the subject of Mr. Johnson's boat should be tabled until the status of the ordinance is decided. Respectf lly Dick and Donna Carl CITY OF OROM I,'SPEC'ION NC, _ y All 14.7,h1I I NO w AD, zf CSS ? 7tj "'11117-A L_ - r •� (q ( Vv E I i CON IR. t + I 10Nr- N(?. lot ,� t � �.{ •A.'; .. '.f I.11t�1.1A1t'i; � t •• t .i, .� yy ► 11�! "irt''. ►ti. t l 11::1 1'trl.tl' COMMENTS: -,jA�SJ FI_I. •l. r .—Allot W. 1, Y_­­ t-- -�.�i�G• s C�.1 vim.,• ma's•-� � � � / . _. _ . � - - _ _.._.._ w w a n;;rlt?;tr'•h11:.1 '.1.1,41, 111, loot 04 (Ir p1U11.(111 V i J (;01(64t• C.1 vVII-•- (_At 1 1 0114 tlt IN',1.1 1 I t, +) 111 1 '011 !.f t , t (Tit C!IVFIIf* I I )'J. I I.,)'ytIll I I re) Y:lI Ilot. lul.•I• . t .• / i r 111/I Yn1 11'1 1; , •' 11'tyit1111111•,, I t tl t'At I I• :,It1 tilt . Irl:.l't 1 I(r►. Iti f)t11/1(,1y t.I•.I 11! I.104/1')'.1 !. • , . . 1 cRII for the Next impe(.tlrnt 24 Iburs too ,Itiv.-ltlr,c• Owner/Contr to sjtspeclu . I c� *Vh-14P i .1! Jor I M•'t) t •rl•� :•r/P ti r'q.« r - op Y 'C•y.�7 �-/K q•+..r....r _.... _-,.�rr.��w.TM�.y,�,.�rrii�Y. �.. - ...r•....r .-, 0��-��•! way ��'X S%S' = 1.2 60 6 41, 4 (o!o .s.� �'`.' 3!5a so 1) = ) . 7 l U a • )larch 14. 1985 TOt Planning Commission City of Orono FROMs Jerry W. Wheeler 3399 Crystal Bay Rd. Wayzata, Mn. 55391 REs FALSE INFORMATION regarding No. 9011 Karl Johnson On Monday, March 18th., Mr. Karl Johnson is scheduled to appear before you regarding TWO variance applications. I have a couple MAJOR concerns with the information our- roundine this case. My first concern is that the "put-lic notice' this matter indicates that Mr. Johnson has NOT been di. acted to apply for variances for ALL of the vio- lations that he was susposed to have filed for. My second concern is FAR MORE SERIOUS. My concern is that Staff's January 22, 1985, "Update" to the City Council on this matter is FULL of DEFINITELY FALSE INFORMATION. I would like to address my concern with the "public notice" first and then the January 22nd. "Update". The public notice which was in the "Laker" on March 5th., states that Mr. Johnson has applied for ONLY TWO VARIANCES (See attached h 1.) A variance to store an oversized boat in his front yard, and 2.) A variance for hardcover that he has brought in within 75' of the lakeshore. In addition to the oversized boat and the hardcover, Mr. Johnson has also excavated the hillside and built a re- taining wall which is FULLY within the 75' lakeshore set- back (Mr. Johnson also stores a pickup truck in this same area). The retaining wall, the excavation, and the truck are AH. VIOLATING NOT ONLY THE 75' SETBACK BUT ALSO THE In' SIDE LOT LI`:E SETBACK REgUIREMEN.T. I do not fully un- derstand the variance procedure but, why hasn't Mr. Johnson been directed by Staff to ALSO apply for variances for these other violations? Mr. Johnson is violating so many of our laws, it is inconceivable to me that he is only applying for two variances. To address ONLY these two vio- lations totally distorts the truth. I am certain that I heard the City Council direct City Staff to ask Mr. Johnson to comply with ALL of these laws. There is also no reference 1n the public notice to tt fact that the two variance applications that Mr. John_.. has filed, are "after the fact" variance applications. It is customary to have this information as part of the public notice in as much as there is a larger fee involved. This gentleman has recieved such "special treatment" in the past that I am simply wondering if this is an "indication" that, once again Mr. Johnson has been allowed to "slip by" where other Orono Citizens are not. (bee Attached) Now to address my second concern. Staffs January 22. 1985 '.'Update" to the City Council regarding Mr. Johnson's vio- lations is FULL OF UEFINITLY FALSE INFOHMATtON1III I am concerned that this FALSE information is going to be pre- sented to you, the Planning Commission, as an allegedly factual basis for you to base your decision on in this matter. It is imperative that you know the truth. The "Update" states that only a "small portion of (Mr. Johnson's) retaining wall is located within 75' of the lake". This statement is TOTALLY FALSE. The truth is that ALI. OF THE RETAINING WALL IS WITHIN ZJ' Of THE LAKE 5HOHE.; The "Update" states that "the bank that was altered is NOT in the protected area" (emphasis added). Once again, this statement is TOTALLY FALSE. The entire excavation is within JJ' of the lakeshore.* The "Update" goes on to state that a *major portion of.... (this storage area) was the bed of a driveway that served the residence on the (west)." This is literally RIDICULOUS. The "residence on the (west) side" just happens to be OUPS. Not only is this information false, fir. Johnson himself would NEVER have allowed us to drive over "a major portion" of his property to gain access to ours. lselieve met In addition to this false information., I have other serious concerns with this report. It is si biased in Mr. Johnson's favor as to give the appearance of DELIBERATE PLANNING. It doesn't even attempt to mention ANY fact that could possibly have a negative effect on Mr. Johnson's applications (and there are many). It is possible that Staff is planning to submit additional information to you Monday evening but, in case they are not, 1 want you to have at least a few facts. First of all, BEFORE Mr. Johnson built the storage area in question, he ALREADY had a blacktop parking area in front of his DOUBLE garage that measures 23' x6 H' .* ALMOST 1,600 Sq UARE FEET OF STORAGE SPACE (See Diagram). Even though this parking pad doubles as his garage entrance, THERE IS MORE THAN AMPLE 110011 for the storage of Mr. Johnson's pick up truck WITHOUT BLOCKING HIS DOUIiLE GARAGE ACCESS IN ANY WAY WHAT-50-EVER. In spite of this, Mr. Johnson stubbornly refuses to store his pickup. OR ANYTHING ELSE, on this parking pad. He insists on dumping ALL OF HIS JUNK ON OUR LOT LINE FOR US TO LOOK AT. • all measurements are an accurate as possible without going onto Mr. Johnson's property. The lakeshore measurements are based on my recollection of EXACTLY where the lake - shore was last year. I believe all measurements to be accurate within a couple of inches. 1u The "Update" politely states that Mr. Johnson "MERELY.... plac(ed).... gravel over existing; grassed area...." (emphasis added) but there is absolutely no attempt to inform you of Just how much hardcover Mr. Johnson has. By my calculation, which may or may not be correct, Mr. Johnson has 84% OF THE ,75' SETBACK AREA, IN HARDCOVER. I wonder how many of Orono's residents are allowed to have 84% hardcoverl Last but not least, this "Update" has missed no opportunity to "shed an unusually good light" on Mr. Johnson. It goes on to "observe", in passing, that Mr. Johnson "has placed no plastic sheeting under the gravel"I While this is indeeJ "a finding of fact" (and surprisingly true), HOW CAN ANY STAFF REPORT BE SO THOROUGHLY BIASED IN ANY PERSONS FAVOR? I am sure that all of the preceding can somehow be explain- ed away ---one item at a time. Nobody is perfect. but, everything taken together paints quite a different picture, especially in light of the long; term history of this dis- pute. I can't prove that Mr. Johnson has in fact continu- ally received preferential treatment from "someone" in Orono. BUT, THE EVIDENCE IS OBVIOUSLY OVERWHELMING THAT "SOMEONE" HAS DISHONEST FIIIENDS IN HIGH PLACES IN OHUNO. I am hoping that the Planning Commission and the City Council will see to it that such dishonesty does not un- fairly or ILLEGALLY "influence" the outcome of this hear- ing. I would appreciate a fair hearing. 4 u / i � / tom/ e ��•,t� %//,/- Lz�Rk \ TRUCK approximated 1 7I X8' IT IS VERY EVII)ENr- (especially when drawn to scale) THAT MR. JOHNSON CAN EASILY PARK HIS TRUCK ON HIS BLACK- TOP PAD AND STILL HAVE ROOM TO SYAHE CITY OF OHONO NOi ICE Ttw Plann.ng Comnusston wte rgld a Pubh. Hl artng lit It�e Cwncd Chambers al 1275 Solt 8 ,-V Hoar] on WrKidy. March 18 1985 on I!a maller of Itw lollowvp land use apphcaltons 1 lr>_HW Jmnes W Oal&w &y Island Lots 2')i and 215, se ISTWWJ P.vo .� _After IhC f..rI vane., es ID har!kover 'WA lakeshrue sel a. Ts reguIat.ons Ior It* ConsltuO on of a 510rage buedtnp 2 No 901 Karl F Johnson. 3393 crysial 8dy — arwnces to hard cover reputations for plar.ememt of grAwA within 75 feet of the la►eshore and lot the st,Nage of a DWI IhJI e. [eeds 20 feel n l.:ngth n hrs lakeshore yard N persons wlshrng :o be heard w 11 appear a lids trine Wt ltten Comments ate solicited Plan, are avadabte la revwr n the City offices Cdy of Orono br Planning Comm.sstot Jean MaDuslh Bukluig s Iorw.g Admtnrstral IPuDkshed in 7t,e I :.kel Mare.h 5 1H851 Ca4fnolf.' 39Y 4nAP C _ WILLIAM J. SIME, JR. 2106 SHADYWOOD ROAD • WAYZATA. MINNESOTA 55391 • 471 -0296 March 5, 1985 Mr. Edward Callahan Planning Commission Chairman P.U. Box 72 Crystal Fray, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Callahan: Since I will be unable to attend the !March 18th planning Commission meeting, Iam enclosing a copy of a change I have requested Pam to make in the February 19, 1985 P.C. minutes. I was informed by Pam that Mr. Karl Johnson of 3393 Crystal Ray Rd. will be coming before you requesting a variance to keep his 25 foot boat in his front yard. This is very close to my home in an area my wife and I walk frequently. In my opinion, this situation is the most flagrant violation of multiple city ordinances I have seen. There are four distinct and separate violations: 1. Dirt has been excavated from a slope within 75 feet of the lake without a permit and a retaining wall constructed. Abck Ci u:,lit-( wa5 put in this --r ea wh i rh i s rnns idered by Orono to be hard cover. (Naturally, this is also within 75' of the lake.) 3. A boat exceeding 20 feet in length has been stored there; as well as a real eyesore in the farm of a rusted out pick-up truck. i. The boat, pick-up, and excavated area are all riqht on the property line, even though our ordinance clearly specifies a ten foot sideyard setback -- even in the back yard. I complained to the city council in 1983 when the area was being excavated, and was ignored. Mr. Wheeler of 3399 Crystal Bay Rd. --Mr. Johnson's neiqhbor-- has been pleading with Orono to simply have the ordinances enforced for the past two years. The real injustice here is that some tyre of political pressure has been exercised to prevent the enforcement of our ordinances in Mr. Johnson's case. Even the similar "Eller matter" was dispatched with the comparative lightning speed of less than five months. (And that consisted of only ONE violation.) To grant Mr. Johnson variances to four ordinances would make a pure mockery of our codes and ordinances. As a matter of fact, I feel our city must insist that this illegal storage area be filled in and returned to its original state. Iam very sorry that I will not be able to voice my feelinqs personally. Sincerely, Copied to all PC members. G �. A b!LETING To: Mayor Butler Council Members NONO From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date: April 4, 198 Subject: Status of Property Located at 130 Cygnet Place The subject property has been closely observed by staff members for the last two months. A final inspection was made on April 3th of the yard area and photos taken of the remaining violations. Staff can report that the owners have made progress in the clean-up of the yard areas. The recent weather has im- peded the final stages of clean-up - stacking of wood, filling, grading and seeding of entire disturbed area. Staff recommends an extension of three weeks (May 1, 1985), to allow the owners additional time to complete the clean-up based on their display of good faith. Council should direct staff to write both the Rossings and their attorney of the May 1st extension date. TO: City Council to- A lotETIN6 FROM: Thomas J- Jacobs, Building & Fire Inspector LATE: April 4, 1985 APR SUBJECT: Big Island Vets Camp 1 WINO On April 4, 1985, I testified at the State Legislature Subcommittee on the status of the Big Island Veteran's Camp. A summary of my testimony and the City's position concerning the Vets Camp is in the attached report. I would recommend that the City start condemnation proceedings as soon as possible on the structures in order to bring the Vets Camp into conformance with the State Building and Fire Codes, and that the camp remain officially closed until the camp is brought into conformance. CITY OF ORONO CITY POLICY ON. VETS CAMP Continued operation of the camp for its intended purpose is entirely consistent with the plans and policies of the City of Orono, whether by the State Department of Veteran's Affairs or by the Board of Governors. However, any agency or group contemplating continued operation must recognize the deteriorated condition of the facilities and the immediate need for complete reconstruction. Continued use of the buildings and grounds in their present state poses a distinct life safety and health hazard: 1. The buildings are fire hazards and there is no fire protection. 2. The buildings are physically deteriorated to the point of non - repair. Several are actually crumbling. They are open, unprotected hazards to children. They attract vandals and uninvited guests. 3. The wiring is ancient and exposed. Frayed wiring and damaged fixtures are shock and fire hazards. 4. Toilet and sewer facilities are outdated, unsanitary and insufficient for ust y more than a handful of campers. None of the buildings come close to meeting State Building Code requirements. None are handicapped accessible. The buildings violate State Fire Code requirements; the cabins don't even have smoke detectors! The plumbing, water distribution and toilet facilities violate Minnesota Health Department regulations. The burning of trash and garbage violate nu^nerous pollution control air, water and landfill regulations. There has been no winter caretak:r to deter vandalism. If the camp is to continue in operas ion, the operat-.)r roust make the moral and financial committments necessary to ensure a safe and healthFi:l facility to serve the publi-7 . The State Architects' 1979 report estimated the cost at that time to be $2.9 million dollars. Where will those funds come from? City officials are rightfully concerned with the future of the camp. City taxpayers review no benefit and can not be expected to finance any camp improvements. In the minimum, we would have to strictly enforce State Building, Fire and Sanitation Code requirements. This would mean condemnation! What are the alternatives? I see three choices: 1. Continued operation of the camp, by the State or by the Board of Governors. But either way, they must depend upon a major reinvestment of over 3 million dollars which could only come from the State. Are you ready to commit the money? 2. If the camp closes and the land is sold for private development, the City has determined that the maximum density possible within our very limited public service capability is 11 homes. Is this what should happen to this publicly purchased, publicily used property? 3. The official position of the City of Orono has for many years been this: Whenever the Veteran's Camp ceases to be used for camp purposes, this unique property should become a public park for use by everyone. This is the only land available on Lake Minnetonka for this purpose. Page 2 We strongly support the Hennepin Park Reserve District in their long range plans to acquire this property. Their management of this area for the benefit of general lake users, and even the r n-boat owning public, the only way this will ever happen. We recommend that this bill. be modified in such a way as to ensure that try health, safety, and welfare of the general public is secured by the implementation of an immediate repair program to meet Sta-e code (Building & Fire)•:rich would result in a minimum degree of safety before the facility is open for the public use. And that the general public wi l l benefit from actual use of the property whenever Veteran's Camp use is no longer feasible or desireable. Page 3 Facilities survey of the Big Island Veteran's Camp Big Island, Lake Minnetonka August, 1979 Prepared By: State of Minnesota Department of Admir.ia -ation Division of Architecture & Engineering (This) is a State owned Veteran's rest camp which has few parallels in the United States, let alone Minnesota. "The camp site represents a major public recreational resoL_ ^e that deserves to be developed in such a manner that its great potenti,W� is maximized" Handicap accessibility must be provided if camp is to serve its purpose for disabled veteran's. Police Protection "none" Fire Protection "none, except hand extinguishers" Sanitation recommends replacement of toilet buildings and septic systems Water Supply recommends upgrading well structure and distribution system for minimal fire protection Buildings recommends demolition of all except pavilion (which will need major renovation) with replacement of cabins and support buildings Estimated Cost 1979 Dollars: $2,908,800 Page 4 PLANNING 1972 Resolution #446 Highest and best use is for public park purposes with management by Hennepin County Park Reserve District. 1974 Comp Plan Every effort should be made to combine available lands with County Perk Pi.strict Land. 1980 Comp Plan City encourages eve,•}ual pub- :c ownership of the islands as recreational resources fo .neral lake users. Orono supports the Hennepin County Park Reserve District as the appropriate agency to oversee public use of the Lake Minnetonka Islands. ZONING 1967 R-lr 1 acre residential 1974 LR-lA-1 2 acre rural residential 1982 RS 5 acres Sr�,sonal Residential with conditional use permit for camp use Page 5 A lwiffn ( 3 /APR 81°a5 To: Mayor Butler ORONO Council Members From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administ for Date: April 4, 1985 Subject: Review of amended site plan and building plan of proposed sanctuary for Calvary Memorial Church The Church has asked that Council review the amended plans for the new sanctuary. The earlier plans reviewed with application ##764 (Conditional. Use Permit and variance) showed an addition of 81' x 1041. The current plans propose a reduced structure of 52.4' x 84.8. The seating rapacity has been reduced from 524 to 414. They have submitte•3 new building pla ,long with the other changes. Staff sees no problem with the amend i_ldiny and site plans. APR 8 195 r ORONO THOMAS 0. CREIGHTON D,MECT DIAL NUMBER (6111) a43-1290 b)CONNOR & HANNAN ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3000 IDS TOWER BO SOUTH EIGHTH STREET M!NNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55-102-2254 (612) 341-3800 TELEX 29-O♦SS4 TELEEOv1ER 612 341-3800 (286) UVMl1D2 MnI1M TO: Directors, Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission FROM: Thomas D. Creiyhton, Legal. Counsel D1. March 28, 1985 R.E. April Commission Meeting W0�1C'��' t985 + ; -("If Y Or su�T[ aoo w.ar,w6tCw.0 E 80000 a•a) (1ol; as, -' 00 s,�•a .100 O.[ .."Ca au.. [[.'[• ,700 11.c0). afa[[1 DE.v[s.cOL0a.00 0010) uc) 630. -roo .a� a.•oo Phere will be a Commission Meeting on Tuesday, April 9, 1984 in the Shorewood City office at 7:00 1 m. This will be a full Commission (not Executive Committee only) meeting at which the atteng%`nce of all Directors is encouraged. Attached is the agenda for said meeting. TDC:jlg Attachment LAKE MINNE:TONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION A G E N D A Tuesday, April 9, 19E` 7:00 p.m., Shorewood City Office I. CALL TO ORDER II. MINUTES III. REPORTS A. Officers B. Legal Counsel C. Administrator Screening Committee D. Nominating Committee Report E. Dow -Sat IV. OLD BUSIT' >S V. NEW BUSINESS A. Election of Officers VI. ADJOURN U A IncETING City Of ORONO APR 81335 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL p� NO. _ '� ' "OkONO RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED PROGRAM FOR YEAR XI URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS AND AUTHORIZING ITS SUBMITTAL WHEREAS, the City of Orono, through execution of a Joint Cooperating Agreement with Hennepin County, is a cooperating unit in the Urban County Community Development Block Grant Program. WHEREAS, the City of Orono has developed a proposal for the use of Urban Hennepin County CDBG funds made available to it; and WHEREAS, the following proposed use of Community Development Block Grant funds was developed consistent with program rules. Reduction of assessments Grants Program Crystal Bay area BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono approves the proposed use of Year XI Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant funds and authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County for consideration by the Citizen Advisory Committee and f^r inclusion in the Year XI Urban Hennepin County Community Development '91or_k Grant Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds. Mary C. Butler, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hall -in, ity Clerk TO: Orono Council htr.0N6 13 FROM: John R. Gerhardsor, Public Works Coordinator APR B1985 DATE: April 4, 1985 ORONO SUBJECT: Payment - Utility Tractor and Side -Mount Mower Oa Apri 1 2, 1985, the Public Works Department received delivery of a new utility tractor and side -mount mower. The tractor and mower meet the specifications required, and, therefore, I recommend payment to Kortuem Sales and Service for an amount not to exceed $19,280.82. to - - - --A hir.ETING TO: Orono Council %PR FROM: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator DATE: April 2, 1985 pONO SUBJECT: Request for Funds - Westonka Senior Citizens Inc. On March 29, 1985, the City of Orono received a request for funds from the Westonka Senior Citizens, Inc. to purchase a van type vehicle to transport handicapped senior citizens. As stated in the attached letter, the City of Orono can allocate community development block grant funds for its share of the monies requested. If the Council feels that the request is appropriate, we must conduct a public hearing and designate the amount allocated and from which years' funding. It would be my recommendation to allocate funds from Year X monies which has a balance of $39,708. WUNI ON I" S I : N IOR CITIZENS INC. Sl'ONSOItI-a) IIN' St'lll iltllAN (:O.*%I,\It!NI'1'N' SI:lt\'1(;li • A UNI11:D \VAN' A(;IiN(N • liOX ,i2 MOUND, ;1IINNES(YIA 55 6-i March 27, 1985 City Council City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear City Council, We are seeking approval of 10% of the Year Eleven Block Grant monies to purchase a private passenger van equipped with a handicapped lift to provide medical transportation for the elderly, handicapped, and others from homes, senior citizen apartments, senior day care, etc. The monies needed for the day to day operation of the service will come from resources through Westonka RIDES. Westurtka RIDES is the new service currently serving seniors and non -seniors having no other source of transportation by utilizing private vehicles with volunteer drivers and a large 20 passenger vehicle recently purchased by the Lions -Rotary -Seniors partnership. There is significant data in the latest 'Metro Council research that identified the high priority for transportation services to the seniors and others. This transportation problem :s expected to escalate in years to come with increasing life expectancy. We submit that during the past year we have assisted 443 unduplicated seniors in our community and specifically 47 in your city. Senior population figures for each of the communities listed 'below with the amount that 10`)6 of each city's funds would total City Sr. Pop• Allncation 10% portion Mound 944 $76, 581 $7 , 650 Spring Park 355 11,430 1,145 Orono 807 27,894 2,790 St. Bonifacius 107 8,397 850 Minnetrista 299 23,851 2,385 We have been in contact with Mr. harry Blackstad about the legality of this concept. he has responded with the information that is legal, eligible, and fundable out of your year 11, Community Development Block Grant monies. Mr. Blackstad indicated that the guidelines identify 15% of your funds for service related equipment purchase. We are requesting an amount that is 101K> of your funds. Our vehicle cost seem to be in -2- excess of $15,000 up to $20,000. We will be able to spend only the amount you agree to, but if you have more than 10% available please share your resources in this endeavor. This request is for one-time funding of this equipment and does not include the cost of operating the iehicle. Our new 20-passenger vehicle will indeed help our transportation problem but, unfortunately, it will not be able to serve the day-to-day medical appointments. For example, therapy often takes weeks of daily transportation to distant medical facilities. With a smaller van, we will be able to coordinate with the clinics and hospitals for block time and take several people with one trip. With the average cost of $120 for wheelchair -equipped medi-van it is needless for us to point out the value of having one locally. We believe we can keep the service at a modest level through the use of volunteer drivers, capital equipment costs through the cities, and rider donations. No one will be denied service because they cannot donate. Our experience is that seniors want to retain their independence by paying their own way. Our donations level by senior riders in the other donation -based transportation services are highest in the Metropolitan area. This service is not to replace an ambulance, will not be equipped as an emergency vehicle. It is to serve those without transportation who are capable of riding in a van. Sincerely, Doc Meier President Westonka Senior Citizens DM/bd Merno #85-20 19 APR 81°8: TO: City Council �, . ' 9.4 0 FROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director DATE: April 5, 1985 SUBJECT: Financing Crystal Bay Improvement Project The attached information regarding the financing of the Crystal Bay sanitary sewer improvement project was prepared for us by Ehlers and Associates. The financing options shown are for assessments of 100%, 75%, 66 2/3%, and 50%. The balance in each projection will be covered by the Ci'.�y in the form of an ad valorem levy on all taxable property. I will be present at the Council meeting on Monday, April 8, 1985, to go over the schedules with Council. Carolyn Drude, a representative from Ehlers, will be at the public hearing on April 22, 1985, to present the financing information to the public and to answer questions. Ef LERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FINANCIAL SPECIALISTS :IRST NATIONAL-SOO LINE CONCOURSE 507 MARQUETTE AVE MINNEAPOLIS.MINNESOTA 55402 339-8291 IAREA CODE 6121 March 22, Amended: Marco 29, "1985 Tom Kuehn Finance Director Orono City Hall Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Local improvement financing; three assessment options As we discussed by phone, the attached exhibits will update that material furnished October 11 (amended October 31), 1984 with regard to your local improvement financing currently under consideration. The amount of the bond issue has been structured as follow:: Contract costs rl contingency $712,335 Engineering 6 related costs 92.604 Legal, fiscal 6 administrative 21.000 Capitalized interest (9 mo., 9.5%) est. 65,000 $890,939 Less investment earnings _ (8,500) Funds needed $882,439 Plus discount allowance 11,561 Bond issue 90} 0,000 The amounts of the three assessment options have beon computed by dividing the total assessments in each of the three options ($675,000 if 75% assessed, $600,000 if 66-2/3% assessed; and $450,000 if 50% assessed) by the 83 properties you have indicated are involved. Don't hesitate to call with any questions. Sincerely, EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES,-INC. Carolyn Or de t r Vice President db/enc. A, EXHIBIT - 1.00 COMPUTER RUN FOR CITY OF ORONO 1985 IMPROVEMENTS - 75% ASSESSED DEB; SERVICE PLANNING 3/20/85 PRINCIPAL 900,000 INTEREST RATE 9.5000% DENOMINATION BLh 5,000 DATE OF BONDS 198S FIRST MATURITY 1987 MAT YEAR - MATURITY YEAR TOT+S% - DEBT SERVICE PLUS 5% TAX VAL - TAXABLE VALUATION ASSESSMTS - ASSESSMENTS AVAILABLE CUM BAL - CUMULTATIVE BALANCE PRINCIPAL - BOND PRINCIPAL LEVY - P+1+5% MINUS ASSESSMENTS INTEREST - BOND INTEREST MIL RT - MILL_ RATE ON BALANCE TOTAL. - TOTAL P AND I ASSM:/P&I - FACTOR OR RATIO OF ASSMTS TO PRI TOTAL ASSESSMENTS OF 675,000 WITH INTEREST OF 11.00% MAT TAX VAL YEAR (OOO,S) PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL TOT}5% ASSESSMTS CUM BAL LEVY 1986 102,077 0 85,500 85,500 89,775 0 0 89,775 1987 102.077 50,000 85,500 135,500 142►27S 137,812 0 4,462 19118 102,077 50,000 80,750 130,750 137,287 114,300 0 22,987 1989 102,077 50,000 76,000 126,000 132,300 109,350 0 22,950 1990 102,077 50,000 71,2SO 121,250 127,312 104,400 0 22,912 1991 102 077 50,000 66,500 116,500 122,32S 99,450 0 22,875 1992 102.,077 501000 61,750 11.1,750 117,337 94,500 0 22,637 1993 102,077 601000 57,000 117,000 122,850 89,550 0 33,300 1994 102,077 60,00'J 51,300 111,300 116,865 94,600 0 32►265 1995 102,077 60,000 4S,600 105,60� 110,880 79,6SO 0 31,230 1996 102,077 60,000 39,900 99,900 104,895 74,700 0 301195 1997 102,077 60,000 34,200 94,200 98,910 65,750 0 29,160 1998 102,077 75,000 28,500 103,500 108,675 64,800 0 43,87S 1999 102,077 75,000 21,375 96,375 101,193 591850 0 41,343 2000 102,077 75,000 14,250 99,250 93,712 54,900 0 38,81E 2001 102,077 7S,000 7,125 82,12S 93,712 49,950 0 38,812 TOTALS 900,000 82t„ 500 1,726,500 AVE DEBT SERVICE FROM 198!, TO 2C01 = 107,906 AVE DEBT SERVICE FROM 1987 TO P001 _ 109,400 BOND YEARS 8,699.9999 AVE MATURITY 9.6666 'DSPLASSM' PROGRAM COPYRIGHT BY EHLERS AND ASSOC., INC, 10/1/1984 MIL R1 .87c .04-� .22! .22f ^t .cc .224 . 22; .3cE .31E .30E .29E .26S . 42S .405 .3FC .360 EXHIBIT - 2.00 COMPUTER RUN FOR CITY OF ORONO 1965 IMPROVEMENTS - 66-2/3% ASSESSED DEBT SERVICE PLANNING 3/28!85 PRINCIPAL 900,000 INTEREST RATE 9.5000% DENOMINATION BLK DATE OF BONDS 198S FIRST MATURITY 1987 MAT YEAR - MATURITY YEAR TOT}S' - DEBT SERVICE PLUS 5% TAX VAL - TAXABLE VALUATION ASSESSMIS - ASSESSMENTS AVAILABLE CIIM BAL - CUMULTATIVE BALANCE PRINCIPAL - BOND PRINCIPAL LEVY - FM SY. MINIS ASSESSMENTS INTEREST - BOND INTEREST MIL RT - MILL RATE ON BALANCE TOTAL - TOTAL P AND I ASSMT/PRI - FACTOR OR RATIO OF ASSMIS TO F°.I T01AL ASSESSMENTS OF 600,000 WITH INTERESI OF 11.00% MAT TAX VAL YEAR t000,S) PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL TOTS% ASSESSMTS CUM BAL LEVY 1986 102,077 0 851500 85,500 89,775 0 0 89,77S 1987 102,077 50,000 85►500 135,500 142,27S 122,500 0 19,775 1988 102,077 SO,( )0 80,7SO 130,750 137,287 101,600 0 35,687 1989 102,077 50,000 76,000 126,000 132,300 97,200 0 35,100 1990 102,077 50,000 7J,►250 121,250 12.7,312 921800 0 34,512 1991 102,077 50,000 66,500 116,S00 122,325 68,400 0 33,925 1992 10F,077 50,000 61,750 111,750 117,337 64,000 0 33,337 1993 102,01-7 60►000 57,000 117,000 122,850 79,600 0 43,2SO 1994 102,077 60,000 S11300 111,300 116,865 75,200 0 41,665 199S 102,077 60,000 45,600 10S,600 110,660 70,800 40,080 1996 102,077 60,000 39,900 1'91900 10^,895 66,400 0 38,495 1997 102,077 60,000 34,200 94,200 98,910 62,000 0 36,910 1998 102,077 7S,000 28,500 103,SOO 108,675 57,600 0 S1,075 1999 102,077 75,000 21,375 96,37S 101,193 53,200 0 47,993 2000 102,077 75,000 141250 89,250 93,712 48,800 0 44,912 2001 102,077 75,000 7,125 82,125 93,712 44,400 0 44,912 TOTALS 900,000 826,500 1,726,500 AVE DEBT SERVICE FROM 1981) TO 2001 = 107,906 AVE DEBT SERVICE FROM 1987 TO 2001 = 109,400 BOND YEARS 8,699.9999 AVE MATUPITY 9.6666 'DSPLASSM` PROGRAM COPYRIGHT BY EHLERS AND ASSOC., INC, 10/1/1984 MIL R1 .R75 . 33C .332 .32E .423 .40E .39F .377 .361 .50C .470 .439 .439 EXHIBIT - -'.00 COMPUTER RUN FOR CITY OF ORONO 1Q85 IMPROVEMENTS - 60% ASSESSED DEBT SERVICE PLANNING 3/28/85 PR I ivi_ 1 AL 900.000 INTEREST RATE 9.S000% DENOMINATION BL.k 5,000 DATE OF BONDS 198S FIRST MATURITY 1987 MAT YEAR - MATURITY YEAR TOT}57 - DEBT SERVICE PLUS 5% TAX VAL - TAXABLE VALUATION ASSES'5MTS - ASSESSMENTS AUAILA11-E CUM BAL - CUMULTATIVE BALANCE PRINCIPAL - BOND PRINCIPAL LEVY - P{I+5% MINUS HSSESJMENTS INTEREST - BOND TNTEREST MIL RT - MILL RAZE ON BALANCE TOTAL - TOTAL P AND I ASSMT/PRI -- FACTOR OR RATIO OF ASSMTS TO P&I TOTAL ASSESSMENIS OF 450,000 WITH INTEREST OF 11.007. MAT TAX VAL YEAR (000,S) PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL TOTS% ASSESSMTS CUM BAL LEVY 1986 102,077 0 851500 85,500 89,775 0 0 89,775 1987 102,077 50,000 851500 135,500 142,275 91,875 0 50,400 1988 102,077 50,000 80,750 130,750 137,287 76,200 0 61,097 1989 102,077 50,000 76,000 126,000 132,300 72,900 0 591400 1990 102,077 50,000 71,250 121,250 127,312 69,600 0 57,712 1991 102,077 50,000 66,500 1161500 122,325 66,300 0 56,025 1992 102,077 50,000 61,750 111,750 117,337 63,000 0 54,337 1993 102,077 60,000 57,000 117,000 120,950 59,700 0 6.3►150 1994 10'c',077 10.00ci 51,300 111,300 116,865 .,6,400 0 60,465 1995 102,077 .0 45,600 105►600 110,860 53,100 0 57,780 1996 102►077 s1,000 39.,7700 99,900 1041R95 45,800 0 55,095 1997 102,077 60,000 34,200 94,200 96,910 46,500 0 521410 1998 102,077 75,000 28►500 1039500 108,675 43,200 0 65,475 1999 102,077 75,000 21,375 96,37S 101,193 39,900 0 61,293 2000 102,077 75,000 14,250 891250 `13,712 36,600 0 57,112 2001 102,077 75,000 7,125 82,125 93,712 33,300 0 57,112 TOTALS 900,000 626,500 1,726,500 AVE DEBT SERVICE FROM 1985 TO 2001 = 107,90E Ail DEBT SERVICE FROM 1987 TO 2001 = 109,400 BOND YEARS 61699.9999 AVE MATURITY 9.6666 'DSPL.ASSM' PROGRAM COPYRIGHT BY EHLERS AW A".. 10/1/1994 MIL R1 .875 . 49" .54E . 53F .61E . 59i .566 . 535 .641 .60G .555 .559 EXHIBIT NO. _�.OIA DATED 3/29/8S ANALYSIS [LAWS OF 1'r9141 OF PROJECT IMPACT ON 1984/BS PROPERTY TAXES AS RELATED TO INCOME CITY OF ORONO 1985 IMPROVEMENTS CITY HOMESTEAL ANALYSIS ASSUMES TAX RATE OF 99.30 MILLS, PLUS PROJECT MILLS OF .30, FOR A TOTAL OF 99.60 HOUSEHOLD INCOME:: 5000 10000 15000 20000 ASSESSORS GROSS TAXES NET TAX NET TAX NET TAX NET TAX MKT VAL W/O P W/P DIFF W/O W!;' DIFF W/O W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF w, W/P DIFF 50000 683 886 7S000 1519 1S23 100000 2264 2270 125000 3008 301/ 150000 3753 3764 175000 4498 4S11 200000 5243 5258 2,:5000 5987 6005 2.60 120 120 4.60 394 398 6.89 1139 1145 9.10 1883 1892 11.39 2628 2639 13.60 3373 138o 15.89 4118 4133 18.10 4862 4880 .1 1 223 224 4.60 394 398 6.89 1139 1145 9.10 1883 1892 11.39 2628 2639 13.60 3373 3386 15.89 4118 4133 18.10 4862 48BO .40 311 312 4.60 438 439 6.89 11:39 1.145 9.10 1883 1892 11.39 2 28 2639 13.60 3373 3386 15.89 4118 4133 18.10 4862 4880 .50 38�j 381 .Bi 539 541 6.89 1139 1145 9.10 1883 1392 11.39 2628 2639 13.60 3373 3386 15.89 4118 4133 18.10 4862 4880 25000 NE T T AX W/0 W/p DIFF .69 406 407 1.20 666 668 6.89 1184 1190 9.10 1928 1937 11.39 2S72 2684 13.60 3418 3431 15.89 4163 4178 18.10 4907 4925 1.29 1.60 6.84 9.1C. 11.39 13.60 15.89 18.10 HOUSEHOLD INCOME:>:> 30000 35000 4(0OW 45000 50000 ASSESSOR'S GROSS TAXES NET TAX NET TAX NET TAX NET TAX NET TAX MKT VAL W/O P W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF W/0 W/P DIFF 50000 883 886 75000 1519 1523 100000 2264 2270 125000 3008 3017 150000 37S3 3764 175000 4498 4S11 200000 5243 5258 225000 5987 6005 2.60 406 407 4.60 759 761 6.89 1334 1340 9.10 2078 2087 11.39 2823 2334 13.60 3568 3581 1S.89 4313 4328 18.10 S057 5075 1.29 406 407 2.30 869 873 6.89 1614 1620 9.10 2358 2367 11.39 3103 3114 13.60 3848 3861 15.89 4593 4600 18.10 5337 S35S 1.29 406 407 4.60 669 873 6.89 1614 1620 9.10 2358 2367 1' .19 3103 3114 13.60 3848 3861 15.89 4593 46C3 18.10 5337 5355 W/O P - TAXES WITHOOT PROJECT W P - TAXES WITH PROJECT PROGRAM 'TAXCRM84', COPYRIGHT BY EHLERS R ASSOCIATES, INC., 10/1/198.) 1.29 406 407 4.60 869 673 6.89 1614 1620 9.10 2358 2367 11.39 310:3 3114 13.60 3"-AB 3861 15.89 4,",93 46CE 18.10 5337 5355 1.29 406 407 1.?9 4.60 869 87-3 4.60 6.89 1614 1620 6.89 9.10 2358 2367 9.10 11.39 3103 3114 11.39 13.60 3848 3861 13.60 15.89 4593 4608 15.89 18.10 5337 5355 1.8.10 EXHIBIT NO. 3.G1B -185 A:iAt"SI`_ fLW` 'R 19641 OF NROJ"(: JN 198:)/86 PROKRTY 7AXES A; RELAILD TO IW"'O' CITY OF "RONO 1965 ImF4l.WLNf NTS CITY HOMESTEAD ANALYSIS ASSUMES TAX RATE OF +'S.30 MILLS, PLUS PROJEL! MILLS OF lk . 99.60 HOUSEHOLD INCOME" 5000 10000 �000 .• -' � A:,ESSJR'S GROSS TAXES NET IAA NET TAX NET TAX MKT VAL W/O P W/P O'..FF w/D W/P DIFF L/O W/P RIFF WO W/P DIFF Wr' - •1, tip DI' 250000 6732 6752 20.39 5607 5627 20.39 5607 5627 20 3 5607 5627 20."'+ 5607 5a. 472 20.39 10)D00 8222 0246 24-N 7091 7121 24.89 7097 7121 24.F'3 7097 7121 24 89 1091 7121 7166 24.89 4Jt3000 11201 11234 33.89 10016 10109 33.89 10016 101D9 33.89 10016 10109 33.89 10076 10109 33..4' 10i54 33.89 500000 14190 14222 42.89 13055 13097 42.89 •3055 13097 42.89 1z055 '3097 V .89 13055 13097 42.89 1.100 13142 42.89 600000 17159 17210 51.09 16034 "085 51.89 16034 16085 51.89 16j34 16-A5 51.89 16034 i6Ut35 .0.99 16079 161"0 J1.89 750000 21627 21692 65.39 20502 20567 65.39 20502 20567 65.39 205 2 2n`�7 65.39 20502 20567 65.34 20547 206 65 S9 900000 260% 26174 78.89 24911 25049 79.89 2,971 25049 78.89 24971 25U40 78.89 24971 25G49 78.89 ry116 'S }4 78.89 999000 29045 29133 87.70 27920 28008 B1.70 27920 28" 87.70 2792C 29008 87.70 2792'' 28D08 97.70 16" i1053 67.70 HOUSEHOLD INCOME.» 5" 10000 15000 20" 2190 J00 ' ASSESSOR'S GROSS TAXES NE' TAX NET `AX NET TAX WE .h: IF mp MKT VA W/O P W/P DIFF WO `-'/P DIFF W/0 W/F [`IFF WO W./P DIFF WO W/P DIFF s •.i► DIFF 250000 6732 6752 20.39 58OL 20.39 6082 6102 20.39 b082 6102 2:! 39 6082 C102 20.39 6M 6.0? 20 39 300000 8222 8246 24 89 7292 ;t. .A '"j 7572 7596 24.99 1512 7596 'A 89 1 42 IM6 24.09 Me ISW 24.89 400000 1 201 11234 33.89 10271 1L--04 3' 1.,351 10584 33.89 10551 1058-i 1.99 10551 10584 13.1.4 10551 '0584 33 89 533" 141BO 15_: " 42.89 1325'12 0 192 42.89 13530 13512 42.89 13530 '57. 89 131P_0 13572 42.:9 13530 0612 42.89 6t Ou00• 17159 112.J ..89 16229 1r;2130 51.89 16509 16560 51.8a 16" • .'-C 89 16504 16560 SI-89 16.W 1f;60 51 89 75OXIO 21627 2169Z 65.39 20697 20762 65.39 20977 21042 f3.39 20977 21042. + 33 20977 21042 A .39 N-* Tv42 61, 39 9000cx, 260% 26174 78.89 25i66 25244 78.89 25446 25524 78.89 25446 25524 -t 89 25l46 25524 M. Z'Aft, 7524 78 49 "lf% 0 29045 29133 81. 10 28115 282O3 87.73 i,0395 28483 81 71' 28395 28483 lV . 70 2f. M 28483 By . 29395 : W-1 %" W/0 v - TAXES WITHOUT PROJECT W P - TAAE' WITH 9ROJECT PR•-X" 'TAXC MS', COPYRIGHT BY EHLERS a ASSOCIATES, INC., 10/l/1903 n491Z EXHIBIT NO. 3.02A DATED 3/29/8:> ANAL`.'SIS [LAWS OF 19841 OF PROJECT IMPACT ON 198,4/85 PROPERTY TAXES AS RELATED TO INCOME CITY OF ORONO 1985 IMPROVEMENTS CITY HAMESTEAD ANALYSIS ASSUMES TAX kilTE OF 99.30 MILLS, PLUS FROJECT MILLS O"- .40, F: (OIAI OF 99.70 HOUSEHOLD INCOME:>` 5000 10000 15000 20000 ASSESSOR'S GROSS TAXES NET fAX NET TAX NET TAX NET TAX MKT VAL W/O P W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIrF W/O . " DIF r W/r 50000 '383 087 7SO00 1519 - I SP S .00000 -'E64 L?13 12SOOC 3008 3020 150000 3753 :3768 17S000 4498 4516 vvv Sc43 52o4 22S000 5987 6011 .50 120 120 6.10 394 400 9.19 1139 1140 12.10 138-1 189S 15.19 2628 2643 18.10 3373 3391 21.19 4118 4139 24.10 4862 4886 .30 2%' 6.10 3'. ^" ' 9.19 11, 12.10 1811.b95 11-19 2628 2643 18.10 3373 3391 21.19 4118 4139 24.10 4862 4886 .50 311 312 6.10 428 4410 ?.19 115y 1148 12.10 1863 1895 15.19 2628 E643 18.10 3373 3391 21.19 - 'Q 4139 24.1C 4886 .70 3&) 3U 1 i . 19 S39 541 9.19 1139 1148 12.10 1883 1895 1S.19 2628 2642 18.10 3373 3391 ;'l.IY 411(3 4139 24.10 4862 4886 f 5000 NET TAX 10 W/P CLIFF .89 -�06 408 1.60 666 �068 9.19 1164 1193 12.10 1928 1940 15.19 2673 2688 1 .10 3418 3436 L.1.19 4163 z 184 24.10 4907 4931 1.69 2.10 Y.19 12.10 15.19 18.10 21.19 2(;.10 HOUSE�iOLD INCOME:::- 30000 35000 40000 45000 50000 ASSESSOR'S GROSS TAXES NET TAX NET TAX r TAX NET TAX NET TAX MKT VAL W/O P W/P DIF i- W/O W/P DIf W/0 W/P DIFF 'J DIFF W/0 W/P DIFF W/O W.•'P DIFF SOOOP 883 887 7 S000 11)19 1525 100000 2264 2273 12500C 3008 3020 150000 37S3 3768 175000 4498 4S16 200000 5243 5264 22S000 5987 6011 '?. 406 408 759 762 y.19 1334 1343 1c.1, 2078 2090 15.:. 2823 2838 16.10 3568 31.06 21.19 4313 4334 24.10 S057 5021 1.69 406 408 3.10 869 875 9.19 1614 1623 12'.10 2358 c_>370 15 19 3103 3118 1; 10 3848 3866 21.19 4593 4614 24.10 S37 5361 .69 w A. u 5 9.19 1614 16P3 12.10 2358 2370 15.:? 3103 3118 18.10 3"48 3866 21.19 93 4614 24.10 5337 5361 W/O P - TAXES WIT40UT PROJECT W P - TAXES WIT►+ PROJECT PROGRAM 'TAXCRM84', COPYRIGHT 8Y EHLERS R ASSLCIATES, 14C., 10/1/1983 1.69 406 408 6.10 869 87S 9.19 1614 1623 12.10 23SH 2370 1S.19 3103 3118 18.10 3046 3666 21.19 4SY3 4614 24.10 5337 S3n1 1.69 406 408 1.69 6.10 869 87S 6.10 9.19 1614 1623 9.19 12.10 2358 2370 1?.10 15.19 3103 3118 1S.1f 18.10 3048 3866 18.10 21.19 4S93 4614 21,19 24.10 5337 5361 24-.10 EXHIBIT N0. 3.02B DATED 4/3/85 ANALYSIS (LAWS Oi 19641 OF eROJECT IMPACT ON 1985/86 PROPERTY TAXES AS RLLAIEU 10 INCOME CITY OF ORONO 1985 IMPROVEMENTS CITY HOMESTEAD ANALYSI5 ASSUMFS TAX RATE OF 99.30 MILLS, PLUS PROJECT MILLS OF .40, FOR A TOTAL OF 99.70 HOUSEHOLD INCOME>> 5000 10000 15000 20000 25" ASSESSOR'S GROSS TAXES NET TAX NET TAX NET TAX NE1 TAX NET TAX MKT VAL W/O P W/P DIFF W/0 W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF 250000 6132 6759 27.19 5607 5634 21.19 5607 5634 27.19 So07 5634 27.19 5607 5634 27.19 5652 5679 27.19 300000 8222 2155 33.19 7097 7130 33.19 7097 1130 33.19 1097 MO 33.19 7097 7130 33.19 7142 7175 33.19 400000 11201 1124% 4�).19 )0076 1C121 45.19 10076 10121 45.19 10076 10121 45.19 10076 10121 45.19 10121 10166 45.19 500000 14180 14237 57.19 13U55 13112 57.19 13055 131',;: 57.19 13055 13112 51.19 13055 13112 57.19 13100 12151 57.19 600000 17159 172n 69.19 16034 16103 69.19 16034 16103 69.19 16034 16103 69.19 16034 16103 69.19 16019 16148 69.19 750000 21621 21'14 87.19 20502 20589 87.19 20502 20589 87.19 20502 20589 87. 4 20502 2U.;89 87.19 20547 20634 87.19 900000 260% 2,,201 105.19 24971 25076 105.19 2497i 25076 105.19 24971 25076 105.19 24971 25076 105.19 25016 25121 105.19 999000 29045 29162 117.00 27920 28031 117.00 27920 28037 117.00 -7,j2O 28037 117.00 27920 28037 117.00 27965 28092 117.00 HOUSEHOLD INCOME>> 5000 10000 15000 20000 25" ASSESSOR'S GROSS TAXES NET TAX NET TAX NET TAX NEI TAX NET I%A MKT VAL W/O P W/P DIFF -i W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF W/0 W P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF 250000 6732 6759 27.19 5802 5829 21.19 6082 6109 27.19 6W,' 6109 27- 0 --q2 G109 27.19 6082 6109 21.19 300000 8222 8255 33.19 7292 7325 33.19 7572 7605 33.19 7572 7605 33.19 7572 7605 33.19 7572 1605 33.19 400000 11201 :1246 4',.19 10271 10316 45.19 10551 10596 45.19 10551 10596 4 .19 10551 10596 45.19 10551 10596 45.19 500000 14180 14237 57.19 13250 13307 57.19 13530 13587 57.19 13530 7 5'.19 13530 13587 57.19 13530 13587 57.19 ,00000 17159 0 228 69.19 16229 16298 69.19 16509 16518 69.19 16509 16578 69.19 I6�09 16518 69.19 16" 16578 69.19 750000 21627 21714 87.19 20697 20784 87.19 20977 2!364 87.19 20977 c1064 87.19 20977 21064 87.1) 20977 21064 87.19 900000 26096 26201 105.19 25166 25271 105.19 25446 25551 105.19 25446 25551 105.19 25446 25551 105.19 25446 255ti1 105.1) 999000 29045 29162 117.00 28115 2823t '17.00 28395 28512 117.00 28395 28512 111 00 28395 28512 117.00 20sy5 28512 117.00 w/0 P - TAXES WITHOt1T rPRWECT W P - !AXES WITH PROJECT PROGRAM 'IAxCRr8" , COPYRIGHT BY EHLERS d ASSOCIATES, INC., 10/I/1963 04981 EXHIBIT NO. 3.03A DATED 3/29/85 ANALYSIS [LAWS OF 19841 OF PROJECT IMPACT ON 1984/85 PROPERTY TAXES AS RELATED TO INCOME CITY OF ORONO 198S IMPROVEMENTS CI1Y HOMESTEAD ANALYSIS ASSUMES TAX RATE OF 99.30 MILLS, PLUS PROJECT MILLS OF .30, FOR A TOTAL_ OF 99.9u HOUSEHOLD INCOME:>:> 5000 10000 1.5000 20000 25000 ASSESSOR'S GROSS TAXES NET TAX NET TAX NET TAX NET TAX NET TAX MKT VAL W/O P W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF W/0 W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF 50000 883 889 S.30 120 120 _SO 223 224 .60 311 312 1.00 380 382 1.39 406 409 2.50 75000 1519 1528 9.20 394 403 9.20 394 4C3 9.20 438 440 1.80 S39 542 2.30 666 670 3.20 100000 2264 2277 13.69 1139 1152 13.69 1139 1152 13.69 1139 1152 13.69 1139 1152 13.69 1184 1197 13.69 125000 300B 3027 18.20 1883 1902 18.20 1383 1902 18.20 1883 1902 16.20 1B83 1902 19.20 1928 1947 18.20 150000 3753 3776 22.69 2628 2651 22.69 2628 2651 22.69 2628 2651 22.69 262E3 2651 22.69 2673 ?696 22.69 17S000 449B 4525 27.20 3373 3400 27.20 3973 3400 27.20 3373 3400 27.20 3373 3400 27.20 3418 3445 27.20 200000 5243 5274 31.69 4318 4149 31.69 41:8 4149 31.69 4118 4149 31.69 4118 4149 31.69 416,.4 4194 31.69 225000 5967 6024 36.20 4862 4899 36.20 4862 4899 36.20 4862 4899 36.20 4862 4899 36.20 4907 4944 36.20 HOUSEHOLD INCOME:':: 30000 35000 40000 45000 50000 ASSESSOR'S 3ROSS TAXES NETT'AX NET TAX NET TAX NET TAX NET TAX MKT VAL W/O P W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF S0000 883 889 75000 1519 1528 100000 2264 2277 125000 3008 3027 150000 3753 3776 17S000 4498 4525 200000 5243 5274 225000 5937 6024 5.30 406 409 9.20 7S9 764 13.69 1334 1347 18.20 2078 2097 22.69 2323 2B46 27.20 3568 3S9S 31.69 4313 4344 36.20 5057 5094 2.50 406 409 4.60 869 878 13.69 1614 1627 18.20 2358 e37.' 22.69 3103 3126 27.20 384,3 3875 31 .69 4593 4624 36.20 5337 5374 2.50 406 409 9.20 869 878 13.69 1614 1627 18.20 2358 ='377 22.6? 3103 3126 27.20 3848 3875 31.69 4593 4624 36.20 5337 5374 W/O P - TAXES WITHOUT PROJECT W P - TAXES WITH PROJECT PROGRAM "TAXCRM84', COPYRIGHT BY EHLERS R ASSOCIATES, INC., 10/1/1983 2.50 406 409 9.20 869 878 13.69 1614 1027 18.20 2358 2377 22.69 3103 3126 27.20 3848 3875 31.69 4593 4624 36.20 5337 5374 2.50 406 409 9.20 869 878 13.69 1614 1627 18.20 2358 2377 22.69 3103 3126 27.20 3848 3875 31.69 4593 4624 36.20 5337 5374 2.50 9 ?0 13.69 18.20 22.69 27.20 31.69 36.20 EXHIBIT NO. 3.03E DATED 4/3/85 ANALYSIS (LAWS OF 19841 OF PROJECT IMPACT ON 1965/86 PROPER,Y TAXES AS RELATED TO INCOME CITY OF ORONO 1985 IMPROVEMENTS CITY HOMESTEAD ANALYSIS ASSUMES TAX RATE OF 99.30 MILLS, PLUS PROJECT MILLS OF .60, FOR A TOTAL OF 99.90 HOUSEHOLD INCOME>> 5000 10000 15000 2ioco0 25" ASSESSOR'S GROSS TAXES NET TAX NET TAX NET TAX NET TAX MET TAX MKT VAL W/O P W/P DIFF W/0 W/P DIFF W/0 W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF W/0 W/P DIFF 250000 6732 6773 40.69 $607 5648 40.69 5607 5648 40.69 5607 5648 40.69 5607 5646 40.69 5652 5693 40.69 300000 8222 8271 49.69 7097 7146 49.69 7097 1146 49.69 7097 7146 49.69 7097 7146 49 69 7142 1191 49.69 400000 11201 11268 67.69 10076 10143 b7.69 10076 1C143 67.69 10076 10143 6;.69 10076 10143 67.69 10121 10188 67.69 500000 14180 14265 85.69 1;,_.)5 13140 85.69 13055 13140 85.69 13055 13140 85.69 13055 13140 85.69 '3100 13185 85.69 600000 17159 17262 103.69 16034 16137 103.69 16034 16137 103.69 16034 16137 103.69 16034 16137 103.69 16079 16182 103.69 750000 21627 21758 130.69 20502 20633 130.69 20502 20633 130.69 20502 20633 130.69 20502 20633 130.69 M 47 20678 130 b9 900000 26096 26253 157.69 24971 25128 157.69 24971 25128 157.69 24971 25128 157.69 24971 25128 157.69 25016 25173 157.69 999000 29045 29220 175.50 27920 28095 175.50 27920 28095 175.50 27920 28095 175.50 27920 2BD95 175.50 27965 28140 175.50 HOUSEHOLD INCOME>> 30000 35000 40000 450of) 50000 ASSESSOR'S GROSS TAXES NET TAX NET TAX NET TAX NET TAX NET TAX MKS VAL W/O P W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF W/0 W/P DIFF W/0 W/P DIFF W/O W/P DIFF W/0 W/P DIFF 250000 6732 b773 40.69 5802 5843 40.69 6062 6123 40.69 6L,62 6123 40.69 6082 6123 40.69 6062 6123 300W0 8222 8271 49.69 7292 7341 49.69 7512 7621 49.69 7572 1621 49.0 7572 7621 49.69 7512 7621 40O0OC 11201 11268 67.69 10271 10336 67.69 10551 10618 61.69 10551 10618 67.69 10,551 10618 67.69 10551 10618 500000 141130 14265 85.69 13250 13335 85.69 13530 13615 P5.69 13530 13615 85.69 13530 13615 85.69 13530 13615 600000 17159 17262 103.69 16229 16332 103.69 16509 16612 103.69 16509 16612 103.69 16509 16612 133.69 165O9 16612 750000 21627 21758 130.69 20697 2.jM 130.69 20977 21108 130.69 20917 21106 130.69 20977 21108 130.69 20977 21108 900000 26096 26253 157.69 25166 25323 157.69 25446 25603 157.69 25446 25603 157.69 25446 25603 157.69 25446 25C'D3 999000 29045 29220 175.50 28115 28290 175.50 28395 28570 115.50 28395 n570 175.50 28395 28510 175.50 28395 29570 u/O P - TAXES WITHOUT PROJECT W P - TAXES WITH PROJECT PROGRAM 'TAXCRMBS', COPYRIGHT BY EHLERS & ASSOCIATES, INC., 10/1/1983 40.69 49.69 67.69 85.69 103.69 130.69 157.69 175.50 O499Z EX. 4.00 ASSESSMENTS PROKCiEO TOR C17Y (IF ORONCI MR 1S M. 0 II.DOX. 1ST YR FACIOR 1.25 ` i'ROIFCT 1911S IMT(FAMENTS - 03/29/M ns T •:100% 10850.00 75: _8100_00 - - - _ 66 213 a 7200,E _ SO%-��400.00 P YEAR PRIN INTR 'i�TKL RiN INiR �TOTK i'R1N INik TUTgL- ►R!N IN1V TOTpC l'td6 ' 3 1491.87 2215.20 $40.00 1113.75 1653.75 480.GO 990.00 1470.00 360.00 74a'.50 3IO2.50 lye/ 7i j3 1113.93 1837•-6 S40.00 831.60 1371.in � 480.00 73V.?0 lc'IY.n 360 ^0 1-54.40 Y14.A0 1980 723. 33 1034. 36 1757. 70 S40.00 772.?0 1312.20 4f.0. G0 6N6.40 1166.40 360.w S14.W 874.80 1M 723.33 954.80 1678.13 540.00 712.00 12S?.UO 4K.00 d.33.60 I113.60 360.00 475.20 635.20 1990 723.33 875.23 1598.56 540.00 6S3.40 1193.40 480.00 S80.90 1060.80 360.00 435.60 79$.60 19V1 723. 33 795.66 1519.00 S40.00 S94." 113ti.00 400. 00 S C.00 1000. C-0 360.00 396.00 )SL00 1992 723. 33 716.10 1439.431 S4C.00 S34.60 1074.60 460.C•0 475.?0 9SS.2C t� 360.0'r% 356.40 716..4o 1993 723.33 636.53 1359.86 S40.00 475.20 101l..i'.0 460.00 4PI'.40 902.40 ` 360.00 316.110 676.00 1994 723.33 556.9, 1280.30I 540.00 415.60 96S.60 4i3O.P7 369.1.0 04Y.60 I 360.00 217.20 637.20 199S 723.33 477.40 1200,731 S40.00 3:.6.40 E196.40 ( 4130.00 316.00 796.80 3tA.00 237.60 597.6o 1996 723.33 397.83 1121.161 540.00 297.00 0-17.09 ! 4CO.00 264.00 744.00 360.00 11;8.00 558.00 199, 723.33 318.26 1041.601 540.00 237.&0 777.e.0 41W.GO 211.?9 691.i0 360.00 1`9.•:o S18.40 1998 723.33 238.70 962.03 140.00 170.?0 718.20 ± 4c0.00 1S8.40 638.A0 360.00 1:8.8( 4:fl.B0 1999 723.33 159.13 882.46 S40.00 18.90 65U.00 400.00 106.60 SO5.60 360.00 79.c0 439.20 2000 723.33 79.56 802.89 a40.0o a9.+0 b91.+0 AN0.00 E2.80 a32.d0 ?eu.00 39.60 3 -' - - - - �• ;4yments - - - 1126.43 -- - - - - - -- - --.- -.-... ------,_ -.- .,._.�__-..____---1001_?7 --- . -• - ------ 750.95 'pJ 6) To: Orono Council Members APR 81Q35 From: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator �t Date: April 1, 1985 L � qN0 Subject: Property For Sale - Lot 7, Block 6 Navarre Heights On April 1, 1985 the City received the attached letter offering a lot for sale. The property is the lot adjacent to the Navarre parking lot at the west end. During a phone conversation the property owner's representa- tive stated that they would be willing to dispose of the property for $2,000-$3,000. The property measurements are 50' x 134.5' and is in a one half acre zone. i h Q 710 RILEY, SCATTARELLA, KAINE & KRAVE, LTD. 1 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3107 PENN AVENUE NORTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINiJESOTA 55411 DAVID L SCATTAHELLA (612) 529.9195 t TIMOTHY KAINE JAMES H. KRAVE March 28, 1985 City of Orono P .O . Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 AT'1'N: Administration h Finance Gentlefolk: JAMES J. RILEY (1909.1983) We represent an individual having an interest ir, Lot 7, Block 6, Navarre Heights Addition. A visual inspection of that property reveals that it is a single city lot hdjacent to a parking lot behind a shopping center in your city. Our client has authorized us to contact you to see whether aq the city would be interested in purchasing this lot. The client would be willing to dispose of it for a rather nominal sum, and it appears that the city is the logical entity to acquire it. [f you have any interest will you please contact this office and ask to speak to our collections manager. Sincerely, Timothy Kaine ,rK:dm to - . 4L METING APR 81935 LIST OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL �j FOR MEETING OF April 8, 1985 r��0 Septic Licenses - Elmer Peterson P.O. Box 284 spring Park, MN 55384 Sullivan's Services Inc. 3660 Highway 101 South Wazyata, MN 55391 Volkenant & Sons Inc. 1030 County Road 83 Maple Plain, MN 55359 Hawg Hookers Bassmasters of Minnesota Bass Tournament at Lord Fletcher's August 10, 1985 Beer License - On Sale Orono Golf Course ;,Il G :'�.`�:'l:.: I''S'I':•J.T,Li:S � ♦ � c,l..t.�l •, r.�: ��•l:� LICIa:SI: A1'1'1.]Cit'1'lOII IL,nr: 471-7757 I i All questions must be answered. License fee, bond, certificate of insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification or Home Sewage Treat- ment Workshop attendance must accompany this application. All appli- cations are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. 1. Business or trade name �, fle}_„san ro _ 2. Business address -n2,ox 3An _ 55394 3. Business phone 4z-€ 31 Residence phone 972_2420 4. Name c_` applicant or company representative hQldina IIKA certifi- J!m brque Ann " catic:, Alfred Brregolmann I5. Type of certification held: —Installer _Pumper Site evaluator System designer I CERTIFICATE NO. %3 Is this a Provisional Certificate? — , 6. If no Certificate is held, provide evidence of attendance at one of the Cn-Site Sewage Treatment Workshops held immediately prior to the current construction season. 7. Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? p,s Most recent year 1934 8. Have you ever har: a license revoked? no When ? Where?_ SUBMITTALS REQUIRED: ( _1. $25.00 license application fee. jL2. $2,000.00 license and permit bond ;gaming City of Orono as oblicee. The State Plumbeis Bond will not be accepted. �., 3. $10-50-100,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance.i�� � - 4. Copy of current MPCA Certificate or evidence of attendance at On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshop held immediately prior to current construction season. LICEI4SES 1•:II.L NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED. List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license j;mN {,f;,t,�r.t,•,,,�� The vndefsilned he-eby wakes application to the City of otono. Minnesota, for license to install and repair septic systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to t►e la.s of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the city of Orono. /�% DailiApplicants signature staff recommendation (Approva1•1W41C— l)vn1Jl: Date: 7. 1/• Reason for denial: City Council f.ctiur. t.tt.•:�—, - n;(•:e.•o.) ba•nir.d: i OFFICE USI: ONLY .te litany. :!• II `_ O!!,ert, at: lea'. ri:l"1'1c �1��.� I;. �,ji•1.1.7:1�ri f (1) Ito N r., .�: r: , r..ry. r:•: ,'•3:3 LICL;:Si: AP1'I,ICi+T1U;: r,... iw: 471-7357 All questions must be answered. Licenre fee, bond, certific,,tc: of insurance, and evidence of MPCA CertifiCC.tioll or Home Sewage Treat- ment Workshop .attendance must accompany thin application. All appli- cations are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. 1. Business or trade name cV','.LTVAN'F crRVTCFF TNC. 2. Business address 3C.frCI HIC, I��'r.Y Ill "ZOU111. 1.-AY!AV tiI13, — 3. Business phone 473-4300 Residence phone 471-IRSn i 4. Cf applicant or company representative holdino MPCA Certifi- j CaLic:'+ 5. Type of certification held: .nstaller Pumper X Site evaluator X System designer Is this a Provisional Certificate? NO CERTIFICATE NO, nO77n 6. If no Certificate is held, provide evidence of attendance at one of the On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshops held immediately prior to the current construction season. 7. Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? YcC Most recent year l(2A!, 8. Have you ever had a license revoked? NT when? Where? SUBMITTALS REQUIRED.. QL4 1. $25.00 license application fee. 2. $2,000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted. f �L 3. $10-50-100,000 minimum Certificate 1 : I•-surance. Copy of current MPCA Certificate e,. evidence of attendance at On -Site Sewaae :reatment Workshop held immediately prior to current construction season. LICENSES ':LL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED. List per,ons other than applicant who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your lice: ����IlccxlT JQ1; ;`_��r OR LFy\I$ k'C)I.TF'RE The undersigned hereby tykes applicatiot. 10 the City of Orono. MinnesOta, for license t- install and repair septic systes+t, and/or puwp out septic tanks, subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of Orono. Date 3/20/85 Applicants signature Staff tecomaendatlon 16pproval: venial: Cater Maton for da•nial: Clty Council !.!tir.n L.it.. A-pr Late lick!­ ..,,i.. — OFFICE USI: nNLY Arl`Y (lf :AU }N \ } ' •'.. ..., • ,. :c i : ;;� , . . i:�� 7 �:1,•;•f,l.I,t:i;:; t•,y..,, �•. :. L7Cl:t�Sl: i`l,]Crt'1'101' i:11 yuc!-:t1 0n : n:ur,t be -111 rctl. Licen-•c fee, bond, certificate of insuranct, rind eviOcnce of 1.111CA Certification or Home Sewace 'Treat- ment Vorl:--hop atte.4t3.';11ce must accompany this application. All appli- cations are sub;ect to a ten (10) day approval period. r 1. B u s i n e E• s or trade name + f Kj f 2. I:vslncss i:ddre!ls /11 r 3. Business phone •/2j- ,5-y7 Residence phone ;i.CO+ :'r+O1C]+C1iI'CiCt.1 Cr i::_11ci:at Or erl 1- 17 I 5. Type of certification held: In,taller i Pumper _Site evaluator A System desicner !; i a aCertificate') CERTIFICATE NO. I s t Provisional _ �, lS. If no Certificate is held, provide evidence of attendance at one of the 0:-t-Site Sewage Treatment 1•;orksheps he-'d i;r_-,ediately prior to the current construction seaso-n. 7. Pave vow ever held a Septic Syst-cm Installer license in Orl".)0 befo_-C., pe, _ 1•;ost recent year 1 �l 8. Have , cu ever had a license revol:cd?_i;re^? 1•:here - Sum':=TT..L-S ..:QUIF,::D.----•---------------- --_- _-------.."._ -__ .. __... CC 1. $2.5.00 license application fee. ek-_.2. $2,000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as oblicec. The State Pluniters Bond will not be accepted. oL 3. 510-50-100,000 rtinimum Certificate of Insurance. C1 _ 4 . Copy of curren• 1•,r'CA Certificate or evidence of attendanc On -Site Sewace Treatment Workshop held iflmmedi :tely prior current coltst:ruction season. LICENSES 1•,ILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL I:'EMIS ARE SUBMITTED. List persons other than applicant who are au' -red by you to apply for pernits under your license The undc•raiSned IK•rchy tsales a;.pltution to the City of Oronc. Msnnesota, for license to install repair Septic systems, Arid/of pump out septic tant., t.biect to the lays of the State of :11nnesota and the Ordinana.s of 0W City of Orono. Date - (- - '� y / -- �- .—_..� Applicants s,, , .cure' .��� / /r✓i�._.... == '"`_ Staff reccn,^ na!etia.n Apl.rov,l: )r Denial: Date. Reason for it/ Cow,cil .` tc:. L..t..-.__.,_______. - h==�t,.•eJ:—� _ Drr.:..,; ,,t.,•.. -- --- — OrrICr usi. Olrl,Y APrLICATION PARADES and SPECIAL EVENTS CITY'of ORONO, MINNESOTA 55323 Date • /h/N4/ VC 19- Application Number__ Name MLJ & _/fr�,j:5&-S 9S - /dip 576 S 9F Address -- Location of -Pere- or Event Ae!�AC-/ni��+/t // -> fi' T -_ l-lJ/�� t �iYC�C 1S Na:;e of Persons and,'or Organization:. Handling the Event _ T-- Phone Numbers_ T G.kS?wJ-Na►� A,G�E-Y7�-��C2� C�itsKci__Y.Z�_����Z __ Date of Event �r,�(, /c'—. 19 55 Hours of Event_ Y;xc A'7. 7V $. re Reason or Purpose Insurance Coverage _-J�!7e'-'— Co,mpanY __ � _._ c�.t7�c-✓_ Copy of Insurance Certificates to be Submitted with this Application. I am aware of all applicable State and other laws -larding Paraaes and Special Everts and will abide by same. I also agree to hold the City of Orono harmless from all liabilities that may arise directly or indirectly from the Parades or Special Event approved by the granting of this permit. Fee: $25 �«,ya.� riG939 3ignatu a .rApplicant -- -_ Fa Paid RECOMMENDED: Yeses No ((//< I Date: r Check --- Cash I Pubi. Safety Dit i C Approved: Yes No Initi�,;,,_ Clark -Adam ; t rator Office Use Only: Re:- a:-ks : - - . __ -- �hC'-►�C� /'L [ If C �/ �\vim``• � � •i .1 1.1 • � 74.)-.�.K,� ;>>�� ;Te,Z S (c r vea %s %, Clcics T�s c✓�Suls'c"�C l� � ��-�� Gam,<s�r" , H� -•�i r�i �/ 7/ - S � � 2 VC— ix'19-J,< rAlf 5 x. c:- C:TN CF 010411 ERP I -NJ yANE P A Y P T-T-O 3IV GRmSS GR)SS EXP76SLOY A HOER SON SL 31 9071.27 123104 BE NS ON VR 1? 5563.25 165ell BOBLIEN SA 31 4559.86 551.44 BRINED CA 9) 169.!10 0.00 ARINKHAUS JF 4Z 1919957 1129*88 SURMASTER NO 31 828C.33 1159.44 CARLSJN VJ 92 7505.12 1378.78 CHECK Jr 99 11R.50 0.^? CHESAICK GB 31 4037. 34 1179.i2 ZMKr K0EP7 JL V 3546.92 50)•Jd E%GLLSH I3 IH 31 2206o53 741.10 Eft 1 C KSCI 7J 93 i..:0 0.00 EPICKSON KP 31 9671.19 1527.65 FRIT LLZR JM 31 8854.24 1195.53 JGFFRON RP S3 6993.�4 1304.64 a ERH1POSON JR 42 9445960 1298.31 5^E"VGU:ST ND 9i S68.30 10?.?C GREGOPT JO 42 695% 29 767.33 GRIFFITHS dE SI 127912S 1118.53 H ALLIN 1" 12 5775.?7 117.52 HILSEN Sc 42 6229121 161112 HANSING :J 31 152S.64 155176 HEN•1 I NG JP 91 617.37 72.72 H:JUS PA 9^ 413S.40 SP31'4 JAC?9$ •J 33 6499.9? 928.56 JJWNS RJ 90 OA1 3J0 J 31441S OV 90 31 1152.45 1325.17 9:00 NH 31 10279.04 147)aM KIANTCZUK R 31 3bS4.24 1649.26 K NUTS CV CA 15 4819.02 692.24 KRIMNEL OL 93 %)0 3.70 KUEHN TM 15 '943.6U 1784172 LATTIN JC 15 5491120 117.52 M:, 3U6 TH JA 37 t .4d 1221.60 MAIUEL CN 9J 1656012 67012 MCGOK AN LR 91 7320 a 16 1151.52 PO R0 NC 2T NS J 31 8498.15 1411.59 PAOSS FT 61 5441.7Z 741.?4 4AAM TL 12 .41.77 663.12 OAS D9 93 i.0' 1 in OMAN LE 33 4344.J0 474.+1 PEAR40N SC 31 S491.73 1?86.62 PZTERS04 RY 93 '1.'.O ).'1 P AO V) 9J 12 714.42 64.97 OU14T VA 92 6Si1114 977.S6 ROTCRAFT SE 43 01G0 7.70 i ASS JJ 42 6517440 161.12 SELLNE9 CL 91 01J0 3.^-0 SEISTAD ER 93 0.?0 3620 S 94_E'1 OS 42 5346*56 499121 SL:Gf SP 93 111C ".J3 CITY •1F :RONO A Y R Y-T-0 EMPL-NO NAME DIV GROSS O47SS EXVIALLDV SMLTH JR 92 6752*54 1101617 S TEF FEN /1AG RE 93 6704.23 963*34 STEVEAS BG 93 H_•00 cola SUTTON or 12 2921610 417.30 TOMCZTK NV 31 8551976 1152632 COUNT GRANO 30,055*24 PAID 9=44 TOTAL n756 T•1TAL TOTAL FICA TAX 0905S m 199937.41 EMZLDYERS FI: A = GPGUP 4.ALT4 0 ' PHYSICi4NfS HEALTH PLAN C = BLUE CROSS/BLUE SMIELO 0 = MEO:CAL CENTER PLAN E = PRUDENTIAL F = COJPD• HEALTH CAPE G = MINNES?TA HMO H = TRAMS-AMERICA ')CC* I = BANKERS LIFE J = MUTdAL SERVICES K = NUIUAL OF ORAHA L = CMOLOYEE•S RENPFIT = AETNA N = NICOLLCT EITEL = LEAGUC 19 CITIES Z = HEALTH CAPE MA:NT ACCT. MISSING HGSP CODE FOR 59ME rMPLWS w C:TTOF ) 1 Dar , pe.0 CaA7c L T•r-e EMP L•N1NA ME D:V GROSS 690SS "P/ALLOW A OHMS L it 690.J0 221.10 AdAMS T it 337.:0 227."1 PUTLED •C 11 11J0.)^ 275.:3 F=AHM T 1+ 6R0.00 220.'0 GDA6EK J 11 389.00 2ZJ.)C COUNT G=w NO 19155.JD PAID (e:CS TOTAL .: '']5 TCTAL TOTAL F:^A T111 fi?OS" a .9^ PMPLOTERS FI^_A A = L40UD HEALTI D = PHYSIC:AW S HEALTH FLAN C = 91.0= :?)SSMUI: SH:ELD 0 = MLO:C=L CLNT71 PLAN E = PP.�)DE.jT iAL F a CG)DO. HEALTH CARS G = +:NNES)TA 440 H = TtW,S-AMERSCA GCC. I NAAT-A' LIF_ J MUTUAL SEP.V:C:M M + MUTUAL 3F OMAMA L = EMPL9TEL=S MEV?FIT M = A°T4a N = N!CILLTT C:TEL a LEAGU4 IF C:T!`_t Z = H.AVf rAME 44:NT e:CT. MISSINo H 5P C9DE F011 SJME 7MOL@S 1905 CITY Or *Rojo CNECR REGTSTTA 03-31.81 ••N 1 r , F.O. , 0*S11Q 3.. __i1L�Lii.Ll��3PtL__�I.LOUSL.'14.1•lr• KT3U4 Oa/01/SS 1S1.93 0 S O RENTALS UTILITIES n.4324-515-90 .AW.< u4/01/85 ,ijjn R l R 10111-s ___ATDItE-Ai Y7.- ---- -IT)•_s 732. 51 S-99------. ,S•NIL ._.. / `•/•Less -!�,•e SA:OSS Co"', - LIO W'SC" --- -- UI0-31 S-1 - -- - raNlal_• Kr)cs 04/-.If1S 17.71. gains CTVER Lie Disc F1-48t 1-515- --- r. ru AL Kr 313 04/01/65 1J.-I SA IOSS CO) -EA Lit DTSC Yt-Nst-Si S-90 •A%uAL - /15 -- _ _11.11 -------- m1402 MAIN__-- 120. DISC- .--- n-as1115/f-.tom. rleL,t -- KrSOI :41E1/11 13.r2 G-l"s ca"!m A:OE PUAC! n-a1R-St S.90 •AYU4 K2);s ;40.01eS 2.1c• Sa TOOs CO WER SINE Disc rl-4015-SIS.93 rAlkal. 'F n IBC-J'CIL'D__sa/•'i[iS____ PACM6 :a/C1INS 1e6.29 ED 91.-LL!" .:At MACS Tt-a01e-S1S-90 ptl IL 3.50- - _Z2_@1[LLI-S - +l1E. Disc 71.4113.5/3-90 .�. _. .40"4 Yh I27.69 . -. _. KQ:I _ _ :a/L1 (!! _ 13'•3a 1JLL1-9 .:•E L:O aUAC1. - __ rl-a e10.115•9C _ .IMIq rCT31.1 +41-1/15 14.15. 9'J3L:1T r'YE L:0 DISC n-anl-111-10 - K?!.1 .41 ills 151.11 W.'L:TT 1TYE .•Y: rU,C♦ /t-4112-1I5-10 .,%VAL KILL .1/'1/3-. 609- OJXL.1F .71E I:1t DISC 21-a113-SIS-9T PAWAL 61.11 - .Crt-' -./'V•• e." R.Sr '-!C.;r•1 Lift :YS L1-41W-12M 31 •AJ,q Kl}-V .:/'t/!s S .1S NLr :11Y •C]SS/-E-:G:^LS a-4210.1/4­)1 lA1WL 7-.15 C - 1 -`ST•t STv .:STALE :1-a521-C3•-13 KF31. '11-1"Ill .a/tl,s! 3.11 3.., cK1 aETt -'STAGE ]1-Nn-'. <0.11 "W-L K131: .[fill .tI [t la3 c•>f• -oSTLG! :1-U21-d59-11 "WIL g9JAl Kr!l .aI'V S! $I.'A 11v.-1 rtiTTAiryl ••sr1iF •1-aJE1-:So-IS +•M.AL -C131-. 1/]r:5 ILt2 .1ST•:STa =.5 AYE '1-al21-129-13 %uAI K137. }I'•••V n.1 r137•:5T•4 :ST<GE :1-1321-156-53 •BYu<L - .h:/51: .u'11as '65.e6 STSTit FDSTSSE 31-4321-Ira-33 .ArUla Kr3/t .11E5 11.51 -IeTSr"ET_l -GSra Gt ]1-1321-101-33 AW-L / K •Ta _•/^t Ie! W R.VI el))9,STEa a•sll•E Lt-U21-2a9-a2 - AAL ' K/31: -417t/SE 3.74 S•ST•ALTC, LSIA:E /E-tin-Sa1-11 rlWAt ' .ClS1' .t1'1/!s .•9 a1ST•:STEA ia-4321-190-95 .Aw AI .....• .•..QS 171.36 r1t•^ ]1 f3TAL SCYLRAL FUN ' 3.52: 4 ,1017 21 TOTAL L:9UCA D"PA':YO FUV !.!• •Y':n 12 TO•iL .ATCR Y?-A-laG •913 • ,.e •0ty sa TOTAL its :Talc r,r,.TPS Fe 4.76'.27 TnAL 1925 CST9 OF ON ONO CHECK REGISTER .A,1. '. 03-11-as PAGE I KI]Je :a/:11e5 Lv PCI IC) .41'11•i it PC13.9 ' ICIll. .4/'11-5 -Cr ]It- .41.71191 .C/11: -41:1115 Kr71:' .11'11I! _41 It IS wC/71.: .41"1113 - .C/11" .4111/65 wCr71C :4VI/7S wC/•1� .W1145 .. K/71: .4/I1155 151.93 N G ■ REMtALs ---J100 <a R A K RW-ALS_ 1.411.03 . salsas CIIPER 11.^1 atoms COI -EA 1•.11 _..__0ela4S. CO]'EA_ 53.12 atoss VIPER 2.10• 81003 Cote Ea 1/S.99 116.29 El PM -CLIPS 7.40-_ 0 PNILLTPS TP).%9 . 131..'a 914L1'9 Y:AE 11.15. IJILI-I Ri NE •11.11 9UIL:rT 4.4c 1.19. OJ<L:11 d:IE 61.11 K..r "ICYS/S '.95 LVV 31AN 1^.95 . n . IIS.ST44 3.12 clSf. : StE1 5•. •) P1sr•!Stci PIIr+:31.. /1.12 r1S{-•-T t •AS.IS IST.IST.t - el itn il.• 4.1 44.11 <3.1 LSr+e s)E1 s.34 L5r •e;TE1 • o PI;r•I ;rcl +14.16 ryw^ ''1 r3TIL 1.1 L`.•! •ON! P Tilt., :'1•:• •2 To^., p9 -U•y f1 TOi:L 4067.)) T!TIL MANUAL ltl GzsC_.___ -__ _- rl-<SH :SS S-.40 J.AIN IL_:•! d IME PUACr 71-A912. SI S-90 PAMUAL 914C Disc 7/-4113-SIS-90 MANUAL ^.�r .:ME PURCr H-N t2-SIS-v0 MYUAL d:IC O:SC ._ 71-44/1•SIS-90 _._ -MANUAL_ ._ L:0 PUACr.._ ._ _ rt-4810•St S-4C-- -. _ MANUAL _. L.0 OtSC )1•4711-515-90 MANUAL .IN: 9URCr it•H I2•SI S-v0 PANUAL 44. OTSC 71-4517-515.9! PAWAL Lis! :NS Ct•4952-120.71 rAN9IL • P M M4IPE!:CO ^. LS :1•4240.1/4.73 MANUAL -:STAGE :1•4721-Jf9.12 •AN4ll -I PIST 01-<121-3<0-t .ANUL PIST44! 16E J1-U21-JS9.14 MANUAL ' P'S!SiC '1•a 121-:69N5 raN4Jl A.STGC a.a •21-i29. 71 wANWI •:3 toAsE :1-/12113G.51 AWAL c.5 if 4E 71-4521./)4-7/ - ANWI P CS TL :C Ot-4321A GS.7S PAWIL -iSudE CI-4321-;49.42 .AWJAL !SIA4E I2-4S2/.Sa9.91 14WAL :.S'Ast r1.472I-s90-91 .ANUAL •I•'CRS 57•LIAL )W9 LIOUCA 6PIPAI:N6 FUND 11i . i-F-4-ING I'JIO i%F C241:E !crPArlN9 MC I"S CITY 0! ORONO CHECK REGISTER •+'• uW M• 0HC6/tl 1b2O LCRO•MMINCSOTA ISE OFF SUPPLIES tNPO-lrsfEM-- -ifMf"MI sC-!Gulp D9S-Ic R4/04/&s 25.20- &EST INFO SYSTEM RAT MISC EQU;% "O"HU 24/C4/03 12.61• AT&T INFO SYSTEN MMT RISC f0U 3 23.0 - AT4T 14FO SYSTEM-�--"" ANY 41 SC EQu1l 0"11: ^a/'41ls 2S.20. AY{T INFO SISTER "AT RISC EQUti L94^TC ^. /:.1ns 21•20• ART :NFU SISTER ANY 41sc '.cup^ 09401C 04/04/45 U4.10 -- ' AUT INFO SYSTEM-"-" -" 3TNC4 EQUIP O9SPIC 04/04/95 20.16. ITST INFO SISTER MAT "Ise [Quip 0R010 D4P14/-S ._ _ 5.34 AT&T INFO SYStFR PIT Rise EaulP C"C10 .4/:U lS I)..- AT&T INFO SYSTEM - - 41;T 4I5C cIul. "Set- N/OUss 1.56• AT&T 'AF9 5TSTE4 -AT -:SC :G01P 125.49 . :ve014 .41WIS 1N.Ct ALL STIR iLEaSt- Mgt RISE ?cu.. 09SC14 14/C4/1S I4?.-0 ALL S•LR [LEC141C P4T RLDO/Si01 0".14 .4/ca/66 1U.58 ALL ITII =LECTRIC AV 6L06/440S _-W41. :4/:4/45 64.13 ALL &•II [LECTRIC ART LINES/LS 523.42 ,vb. L 4114,85 9.'A If 4 T III) SYSTEM TCLEPAG4E 9.'. . . 9S'I. .11: 41-S C.:O +^YEi-4N -CSV'L ISM EN3 4"H •l1t .1401. .4/I4115 64.11 P", STR 00 Vi'vE Lift L•.G CONSULT .9e-.1. ,.W41&S 21R.13 E•NES•ROO RCSE•R AsN ENO COMIYLT L9494 d4/14195 449.39 1^AESY100 RO:EAf LS4 EAG CAJUJT L9S0t. :4/J6/45 W.30 RSLEi'43C 2OSESC -S4 ZW CONSULT .RICI4 ../:A/ll 11402 --YE:-R-C RSS71- A;% fJ41LLT . Rtt h ,L/,4/!s 21T.22 ! Tf3.403 +SSE^E SSA EMS C^R1QlT •.e!e: _41,4145 13^.'^ P J04L14 -91ft T: 4) •-T11•UIL LWI:C S4/04/1s 236•16 CAV PORE. a !9UIF -.It Ilse EW:- 234.16 . + m IT: ........ 31.AA C-APIA-UILISA:N6 P.T4/-Uet 04-08-85 PAGE I w ACCOUNT NO. INS. & P.O. 9 MESSAGE 01-4210-129-31 '•� ...•CNS -- . 01-4342-039-14 ' 01-4342-069-15 31.4342-t29-31'- :1-4342.124-33 C 31-4342-249-42 C+.4S60-124-iS--.___ 22-434Z.S49.91 C 12-442.549.91 t3-a342.SA9.91 »-UR-S69-92 -Cgs CRS 01-4342-249.4E . t.4143-329-I2 G I 01-4343-129-II T3-4344-S69-92 .a. -CMS F1-tRC-SfS•9J •� .... Cgs 11-4321•;69-ls i1-4342.249-42 J1-ISU-249.4E o i. /90f :ITT OF 0f010 CHECK REGISTER 0"110 85 PAGE 2 All GR(CK KO•_OAT[ 4M000T CY 94 ITEM O[tCRAIiOM KCOYKT R0. INV. 0 P.O. 6 MISSAGE 04/94/65 112.46 CMAll PUaUSMINO PRIGIPUOL J 1{S.ft • [ul ____ ..•..• •.•-CKS it l ., ;YON2.. COPY OUR aA RAC--- OFF SVRRL I[f-..-- .- 01=1210=039�12__-_--___.. .__.-_•. " la2 .W4/45 7.50 CMT Ou. •• IMe OFF SUPPLIES 01.4210-059-11 CY916 5t/•A/a! +13.64. Ce•Y OUR PR IMC 5if 9UMULs 01.4210-069-12 .: 09f16e 54/C6.13--_____ .. 115.66 C21Y cu. •4 the - .. OFF 'sVPPL•E3 - --.. -01.4210-069.12- OVe1N 74/il a2.20 CO.T Mu. •w IMC OFF SUPPLIES Of.4210-069-IS 'r OV9142 Ct/U/6S 8.69 CYr CIY •K 14C 'IFF SUPPLIER 31.4210-129-31 M142 1a/:4/9S -- ' - - -3.19 - COPY OUR •K INC - OFF Su.PLICI - 11.6210-156-31 -' -• C99142 14/C4/!s ?GS.2s COPY OVP AN the OFF SURPLUS 01-4210-1 R-33 Y - N16142 :./0195 11.15 CLroT OUR -4 INC OFF SUPPL(3 01.4210-249-42 • O"142 .41,4141 - 1.13 CORY cu. JR the OFF SUPPLIER 7I-4210-SIS-OC ".142 .W./!s .r6 C-•T OUP ' IKS OFF SJPPLE3 r2-t710-S N-91 ' C94161 '4/.4/2S .51 COPY 510 a- :MC OFF SWRI It% 71-6210-569-92 401.90 ...u. ...-CMS 010-11 VILLCY CC C:f111I3CM:OlR ;1-016-129-31 At .'d .Y7254 '4/.4/9 2F1.23 6EUE441 ."AIA tM !W:P/RTS/6CCis1 21-4232-569-92 • 211.25 ..•... .... Cgs • S SiJI :4/C6/•5 3•.27 .L4-IA)S CV/J 1M1 TAKES/LIC O1-4147-179-12 3R.25 . • ...... ...... '912F9 .4/.4/E! 141.19 4.:0 HEARTH MC MEALT- INS -1-4151-121-31 JV{7F) _4/.4/05 itC .l9 RR IMP -[4LT4 1K `•i604 INS I1-NSI-I2S.31 CMal? _41"Iss 246.46 6AO1A• M(A.TM :9C MALT" INS 01-L N-120-3+ VVp IFS .a/Ll/FS 13.?7 Y"Uv TEAL-M ".0 -ILTK :N3 01-1151-124-33 '02/5 -11 41-1 106.-1 ;PM- -CALTM :11C HEALTH t63 74-4111-590-03 694.it ...... ...-CKS '962F/ ,11 4/TS lF.IS MEO :-K -.1LIM CIA/ MEALTM IRS "1.41SI-249.15 19.2F/ 11.41-5 /F.1S 1:5 :-R -NUM CAPE MULTM 1-5 '-4151-129.31 -V62r/ _4/:4/13 I1:.:3 4:3 :1- -'4LiM CAR, WALT- IRS n-1151-1?4.13 :V.21/ -W./95 IFF.1. I" :-• `ILTA CAP_ MULTM IRS -1-1151.249.12 1432FT '. 4/../P5 44.:1 N.5 C-4 -:ALTO CARE MF.tTM IRS 72-4151-549-9t N321I :41i4/1S 66.:2 M.0 CYR-ELLT.I CARE MF,ALTM 119 73.4151.549.92 551.14 . .. ...... .•..CMS :Vl 25 4f.6/!3 2s1.11 -AC. CMCill t3 OWN COLOR 72-4232-569-91 :ti6?. 41'1IS$ 100.A -=C- C-E•'CRL C1 0T.M.1 Ell q-4s65-S•9-91 Ins CITY of OR•10 CHECK REGISTER 04-05-e5 ►a0E 3 � • 1.1/1.93 • I'�• )4/J4/81_ 1001 3_s2 _HALLSN/OONat"T f l • CORF/ICMCOLS 01.451M739-/2 - � • G _ - •..-CRS - _ - ON No ^a Nt/B /01.37 Hr9N Cry TRUS PRTS/.UOL 4t.4322-40s.10 • ' OY919' 74/0135 45.64 RUNN-741Ra5 TP4 YL V.ILE. GC if-•!1f-919-IS _ .VS"t 14/04/Rs 4.49 RUENY-TA1.43 PaY:V VtIE"[ 't 13al-f I.-71 • CY13vt 14/C4/as 3.96 RU!144-TH7.Ia! P4YCL/.: L495 1'.I3.1-749-91 (WO l97 LHC4183 5.41 RU•44-THOUS TRI YEL IP ILEA 7E .•-U et•569-92 $9.12 Y • W4.4 ;4 /.V IS 77.11 TY: _1SER ••TOIPUL 2I-4322. ro94L4 .. /.4/93 Tr' _lR!R P1f:/FUHI 119-31 C1-aS22.120.31 35.43 ' • 7YR a1, •4/^I/!f Urwp P; ryi ;Urrlr E111-)IPr :I.: CFSI I4-4211-S90.9s 11.22 •. {RS 7194Ss 14/L4/RS /V.tl 06I3/34:3! W RIT ISRCE-H1150.1]Rf r-4341-919.12 4 W9adl LW"Os IS'. ^ L^SI:/fJITE 32'. .RI .da:C-4Z: Pi;YrR Cf. 4310. 150.12 T905 341C4/as 74.`7 04IS11JITE 321 MIT 15RE C-nP1ZSC/) 01-4540-339.12 eIa1S •4134/15 7R,'.; L4315/SUITE S2: AO♦aRiC-n•IZsCt7 ^.1.{740-171-33 C S43s S4/.'./ef I7C.C7 LOCIStSUIr' 32' NNT 45Rrr.Mr177-0]RI CA430-17M3! e 411 '4I.4/4S tf'. `: LI:S `.'SU:1ti !!i nI 1cREC-aY- ri ••;tY •. U aO-N{-Sl :n 4S5 Sa V.I.S 2)a.t4 L^45re a:rr r2. :`H:Y !!. Y•R ER ;1•lfS2-)69.IS "I'll V/":l/H 4.14 L'Of5'eJ•i •. l2: ^P UUP!E9••i• •1.a143-;69•ls C99435 'u _4/Fs .U."I LCUtS'SUtr' 32^ 34T4 S►:C-Fre CIN 33S-JN.Is ^99435 .11141.5 a1.11 l^OIS/RUITE 323 4)HI9 laa y-F±P 72-4151-349-91 •P'O455 .a/,4/7) I.4R L'sti'SVtTE 52J 0. C1U4IE••f Ev 17-4313-549-91 foeols '41L41!5 fr.47 L"11^11U;Tr lt' 71Ta P44C.PEP It-4SSS-740.91 'V9635 L.It4/4. MIT L.)IS•SUT" 'tl 40414 "NMfE3 /A4312-s6v.97 rye 435 14/141.I t.S1 LY:I:/•U.T; 31' ]P Cr1RTE•-Fte 77.43is.$69.12 ❑9415 :4/E4/4) NOT l-tI S/]YIr7 it: MIA PRJC.FEC 71.0 33-Sag-9t ` l.7N.•2 • ...... ....CRS C9R lit ;4/.{/e1 Ia.t11.5: 0•TT ^' 049 LSR: l:ME ]ERV:C! 1ST AT4 r1-13/5-130-32 • 691.46 C!Ty Y L^YO �191 OFF RLRT Ol-{J31-119.11 14.973.16 • 1985 CITY JF On91f0 CHECK No. DATE A NICK REGISTER O"ll-Gs MK { •I C"439 06/R6/GS 126.69 L40 Lk F440 TRACTOR CWIPpfi/6CLSS O/-4231-260.42 r - - _ _ __.__.____ •..-CKS l ••.. 1,607.20 -- Pl"3 0143fr tdAl0C--21c ACRT Ot-4160-240-TI i .ea1.33 - .l. 1M 41U ^4 /CM 95 M1l1.i{ •: NN!1NSC1 UTILITIES Ot-4324-39942 C91 In.04/04FGS __ 63.F1 0144,66f01 _ UTILITIES 01-4324-129.31 PVe 49^ .4/C4/95 42P.:2 N: W!46lC3 UTILITIES 72.4324.$49-91 1.102.15 - !"T SF PUNS FIN' SER9:CC 2N3 OT■ !t-43t1-132-12 12.110.46 • CYR1>9 C4/'.4/!1 MISS ]'a UTILITIES 51.4124-099-1T 191NN VL4/!! M.15 \:° JT/L:TIES 71-4324-Vb71 VIS)V [4 /':. /95 19R.9S YSa WIL''TIC$ 31-aJ $.240.42 • cvs b) '4l:. nt 4. a. S• r,lP UTILIftis !1-a12P i9E•V r9H a4 G/!4/N! 4.2S 41] UtIL:TIL! tt-6324-290-17 ' WI519 :6/S4/61 4.23 42P UTILITIEC 01.4324.290-9f Of ^9e])9 .4/34/95 296.12 41] UTILITIES F3.6324-569-92 -Y11)9 :4/i4/15 21.32 JTILITI:S P1-4324-569-12 ro9 ]S4 `4/AR5 2902. sxa .T!LCT!!S 73-4324-S9C-a/ .. M 3$v :4M4/85 nota 9TIL;TILC 11-4324-S90.93 393Ji !"W. .4/C4/ss 66.34 N:%T./FS•:tk >4LL TtL!P,.IN: :1.t710.3SM 12 .. .99 )I^ .41 41PS 16.34 '1'NC4P!iT-N 9CLL T'L!aYOxC 1T-41M..'SI•N ^915 h• :4/:4/9! 51.21 1132T44!eTNR S:LL TEWHOIE 31-U25-iSo.13 ^v1 )I] u411414- 124.31 ♦S4T4.t STIkk PrLL T!LCP-Skf .^1-4320-12M 51 _ .4P-4/11 0.51 N^Rr.YUT-.N Pr LL TTLCP-M r. rt-4320-IF4-73 1W>I .4/:4I!5 66.32 :1 -T4E ST-kk TELL t.Lrev01S 11.4120.249-42 .4/.4/6S 11.26 N?T4.IEST;NN R:L4 14LPN!N: T-4!M-S10.01 _ -.'.612• .4/(4/!5 IR.R1 •114Tu!IT: 4k FILL T!LC9xl.r IA Ui}t69-fi roa S F' ;4/.4/11 19.27 41-1-419T+ik R-LL 'ELIP-ON! 74.4320-590-91 9a ]i^. .6/r.Fas 10C.55 IICRT41"Illk DELL 4RVERTISM 24-4323-590.93 SIN.12 . • ...... ....CKS Pvl SVO 94/L4/45 F.•1 )TTrn SROs !NC 804/6ROS Pk' 74-4231-590.93 • PIPS • • r 1993 0; `' or ORMO CREC6 REGISTER 04-08-39 PAGE s A "If AMDt11 Mf 9C R004 liCP OC4CREPT3 GO ""MIT W, INV, A P.O. 6 RCSS//C r1--�CNCCI �\ • .1 IA 1 CROSS? ../!4/!f r6.34 "ERA PSOa 3/11 10 3/24 91.4141-039.12 ' 4 04/14/65._ 2.97 PIRA I"A 1111 f0 3124 01-4141-040.15 • _C91Syr f1vG 54r - C4NVIf _ `.to ---- PERA- -- --- -- --►tf A -Slit 10 VI-.._. 71-4141=0SO.14 -- - - - ---'. cvAsvr .^4f,4195 14.`1 Pr4A PER 3/11 To 3124 11.414t-069.15 4 • CVSs9/ J./4a1A5 5.56 P:u PER $/11 TO 1/24 01-1141-d99-17 - CIO Syr Sa P:a/!S _ I.IF C:44 -- -- •CRA 3111 TO 1/24 :1-4141-1 It. IS-- - -- t9G1V/ :</,4/O 14.1S P_AA PEAR III TO 3/E4 11-414141S-31 ,1 Cv>S9/ 141,41 IS 301.13 rr •A PEA III IO 3124 "1-114t-321-31 _ r96S9/ ^411.4/65 141.16 P.PA - PER 1/it TO 3124 rI-4141-126-71�-- - - M6IVI 14/4411S 193. r9 Pr.a PER 3/11 TO 3124 :1-4141-174-33 4 `V6SVr 04/../RS 121.53 1_19 PCRa 3111 10 3124 CI-4141-E49.42 nVAsvl •141•4"1 14.11 Aral - Pi41 3111 TO 3124 :1-N 11. 190-ei ^9H9/ .4/:41 r5 1.'; P:4A L'I! :NS ^1•N12.129-31 4 'V6191 34141/15 14C.15 P:4A P-a, 3111 TO 3/24 71_11 11 •315-93 `vase/ a/.a/M1 121.29 PO4 PIRA oil to 3124 r2-1141-549.91 ' M15V/ .11 rbs 132.'S .:SA PERA 3111 TO 3174 I3-41.1-SV9.92 -46597 _a /,.alH 4S.59 .•\ WAR 3111 TO 1/24 74.4141-S90-93 2.9S9.19 C 4 u.•.. .. .CR; • N9602 .41"4/1,5 1:." r.A's 7ErP R;CA Of M•: AUrl !1•l1N-E{b 47 4 13." • ...... ••.--R1 4 'Matt ;4 /.'-/•5 244.13 2111:.IARS N'-'LTI •L ."AT, !VS 9-3N2-300•Gr 4/T.115 292.SI P+TSICIANS M':L tM PL 414L TN :S• 9-4151.JH•12 4 -91>AI ^a/.H •7 W." F+111.:AN. MCiL•+ .L n'a LIM :R3 11.41SI.369-15 ^W621 4P'a n5 141.1; •vfs.CT4 r.. v-q!v 4L :•liu •Li n1-N 11.121AI 'v40 .41 41-1 97.51 .1'S:'!uii w: 411 'L -ALI. :a$ y.atS1.17M 31 9V11 a/ a/•5 9S1.14 P.T!:C:AS: n!•LN -L .:SLIT, rt: "i•41Sb/20.11 16G621 :a 1../•5 93r.11 e.fl;r aYi NS=LT. PL a.a L1- !as 11-4131.1r4-33 -Y•641 la /'aui 161.63 •uf9':IAA' MeiLto PL M.ALT. !A. N1.41S1-249-42 1Ya611 .A,'.,-$ /49.40 .ns!:IAv; 1i104 PL AC.LT- :a; ".4151-290-61 'Yr bal 'i /'4f`5 Sr•. •1 ..t4!C•A•.S +-1L•1 FL N-A(TM ;A! r1--4111.SIS.v3 'Vl6H '61 .1.5 44.'S F+1;'::A,. wL ALTN .L NCALTr IA• 72-4151-S49-9t A5 111.15 cns': n•,t M: At r- PL Mr:1LTu IL! lS-U 19•561-92 ^v162E Y/.4/!S ')5.51 :•.A su--L, C. I1P FURL:IURE ^. 1.45a9-1to- 31 UVs62. ca Aa/13 15.14A.49 9:.91- NPR 4 ASSOC LUX 9(IS .1-2040•770-n1 'w516 -11,41-S 671.'C 111RA4 MSTA A t1Ru: R-fal RCa L!4 11-43i1440-16 _41DH '•La/aS 4.151,74 "P.A. M11a A <130C 110WIS 01-4112-344-16 •/'a/IS •33.1. 13PMtY W. a 1314: -.'6SULT145 31-43Q.249-42 096N1 141-IM 253.13 • ?Nt- M1:4 A ISCOC CCGIULIIRS 7b SCS-660-16 LVCa21 1/ 4/15 196.s7 'C•MSR MA:A a ASS" CLRSYLTIIG E1-U'l-129. 31 • CM 696 `., Wit IS•.'0 PeP9<M uPA a ASSY. CcR.1LI 146 Ct-43:3-1 R•33 - 'r 1/85 C179 OR Me" Men N0. RATE AMOUNT CNECN REGISTER 9C N00R 1TER DESCRIPTION 0"he5 ACCOUNT N0. 149. 0 P.O. 0 nu 6 MESSAGE M AI 00002G 04/04/0 1.111.0 P10n4M MAIN A ASSOC CtMSULTIRG 01-4307440.71 MRIS O41:4/IS 141.04 PDPNA4 M114 A,ASSUC LEGAL FEES 41-2040-000-00 • OSeG2!--•:1JL9J!S- -"70.1T---- F00NA4 n.:R t 4550^- -C CN SULTINf----- • 14PA1e1 9.11) P9PnA4 41I4 1 ASSOC CCNSULT[NG ♦1-UCS-UO-07 =,a: NO2 14M/11 $3.05 PIPn44 MA:4 1 ASSOC LEGAL FACE 44-27A0-000-00 , - C99052 141-6195 11.^.7 POLICE 4ARNSMAN ASSN OCORSIPCA:COCLS 71-4240-129-7/ t r9a666 J4/.4165 2.50 A C P•OCNTIFICATIONS 5FF SUP -LIES M-4210-129.1t t.s0 •••••• -•^CMS N16A6 .4/14/6S 0.10 ST L2VIS 14 IED CTR )'NCR CONSULT -1-4726-129-71 41. M M V ...... ....ENS egg it 11/14/15 N.•9 ST T11AS SS C0\ F7 F:CA 5/1110 1124 i1-41 A2-179-A2 CA 112 :41"U25 4•.1 ST TRCAS SS CY, 10 1 A 3/1110 5/2+ -W r12 Ili 11-5 101 • i' PSas ii •.'• F) :CA 1/I11^ !/21 '1-N12-1SMIa rid F12 a/ A: Re 127.12 T1'aS :>9 Fp 1 3/11Tr 112, '1•4112-169-I5 -9. 112 )a /.V tS 11.i1 it rn4s [i cn FJ :CA 3011.0 1124 '1•110-J99-17 9a r12 '4/.1/!S 59..0 S. T`A5 i1 CON F1 F:CA 3/11.0 3124 '1-ItQ-115-11 m rig i".411S 111.90 .T TR:AS a SJN FC F:C1 )1111C I/24 Ft-4142-1FM 77 ;9R N4 C4/.4145 1F1.11 .1 TA'AS is r0N FJ :rA 1/1111 1124 `+-N •E4 t9•l2 c9A 112 4/ .145 25.11 , T1"A• cl, 1') ':CA 5/1113 3/24 )1-4112-290.61 1•0112 J4/:.1.5 Rt.11 it Ti+. A' '. 11 F:CA S/1110 !/Z4 )1.at a2•sIS.9: -.w 1t2 .4f.41FS T..S it T•}i I[C. )/1111 5/26 r2-N at-sav-vt "a I,I 741J4/1S 124.55 St Rfas is C11 FD FICA III TO 7/24 T3.4942.569-92 IArlt 4411161.5 15.61 it T1rAe :l ..•. FO -:CA 11 IJ 5124 ra.4142-590-95 1.405•S9 ...•.. .•.-Ells ^.911CA !4/;.191 M.'s .1 T-ERS-11 ^-T.-LTN OTAER CONSMT T2-4)^6-Sa9-91 11503 -tA/44 141161SS '86.•r .' P71-51 91. ;1SP IL70 iURC44L " .4641.205.r! 9sfl.6r . ...... .... cos 191254 )41,4/1s 4.95 .T'F-iL QILS ^011 01F FROLT AIR 01-1232-129-71 4.95 ` SM ♦j CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 04.0e-e1 Fut 1 w - -- - - O T O IAN O s 0 R MESSAGE RTC AMSJtt rE%001 ITEM OEGCAIFTION ----A CC YN N • -�-T S S.2S,___-QQR STKI;M[R IYY3___ YCAIj{ R� Y -c{s 14,04,85 2ZO04 TWF 1WALT Ce 441 111V eR05 2Mtz7t-J+0-n ^/ ..-Cgs • 15.21 UN:FSA+S +\l144-10 YLRIM A+/- 01-4221-126-11 --'--- ---- - Of/OA/3) 62).11 U41FCRNS MMUMIIie Y£AAINO ARF .0 t.i 221•lih ll • .6/C4/31 1.SOC.30 UN:F)RNf aNL3N:TC0 OARNICR VtSTe C1-4560•120-11 _ 2.162.20 •••-CK3 U1aI1S 6"..:A YM:rEA str1 OI MS COMP SCNCCLS '31.13Sa-266-62 Ac.-3 ...-Cgs • :4/16/%S 1.1S0.il A:a24rA.CtrT F FIRE SCFrSC: 2NO )IA 71-4719-113-12 • ••• CKS • 1 M:6/1s 1.10 •:ST±RO L:I£ LIFE :NS 11.4152-31+./z 21•]S /!ST£R1 L:IE :YS L:I1 INS 31-41S2.069.IS .AR6/+1 1•/:6/11 3.19 GST'F'1 L:F_ .1% L:FC !MS £1-4tSz•I21.11 • ':6/.4/85 21.4. :SIi14 L:I£ :13 I:FE INS 0t-4112-t26­11 7fL 6/!S H.SS •: it±il U.; :is L:F: TNS :1-4152-12+-71 !6/']6/•S 4d3 6: ST:AY U.; :15 L:FE :M1S :1-61V2-116-7! - .H.6IU 4.a6 •:31: 14 L:I£ :hf L:IE I43 01.012-Z49-42 :6/01/21 f.13 F: iTERN 1:.! :%9 LIFE INS 0/.4152-2+0.61 16/U/01 2T. F3 is STEAK L:FE :43 L:F£ IRS 71.4132-111-+3 y4/16/15 4.94 NCSTERV L:IE tis UPI INS T2-4112-sihp '. UCN 1V 1J.14 Nc!?6N I:.E :1S L.F: INS 21-4112-160.+2 I.•) NLST'a1 L:°£ :13 WE EMS I6-41$1. M.61 - 1e1.)1 . -Cgs 6/'6/11 11.6+ N-.:31- 41 n ±LaC rR:C Ur I L: rI-. .1-632f-2ah62 11.6+ . •••-CR3 E W%l 15 1300 A1rM/• O"A Say W.? OFF EOYIi Ii.1£ w .a/Sa/zs f/.32 41% S +n-•S -Te E•RE11C :1-a 71 z-32p-I1 11.3E /4/'6/RS J1.6• + • • A119111,1 C3CLS 11.4260.12+•11 .. /• 196I CtTY OI OAO(O CHECK REGISTER C, CC 41. OAIC AMOYM _____. YCY005,______ ITEM DESCRIPTION. _ _ 4CCOV4f 43. INV. I P.O. I MESSAGE �.'+li .� 32.43 • •. OYIOO).. .4 n:a/ef _._ ll.Nld 7— SLN A:YLe i0A9 AuiO i0u t7— T:EfIO-17ti7T____. ' 4 •I TM[ lYM0YI1fOYi /MN3/IL gCOtl3 91�E7W.07F17---� ----- -_ ._.• ' 1f.+0 MEAT U LERN•ANA41 ANT LWSACS 01-4343-099-17 - - n.'9 . "- 009"4 ---- S.10 NATL PIPL PROTECTION IC09S/IERIC3CLS 01.4la0.11M]7 " .4/:4ef 5.10 "v1.7I .411a/85 141 Ai 130PTo1 E+VSYCCAIMA NVT "LOG/ONUS I1-4131-569-92 ISI.S? . VNY:! .4/:4ls7 15.^' -'SRIIC S,APCTI PWf- Nhf NISe EW!P 71-4342-129-31 •a Y•.Y lr oHf I2.51 E-P 4!IN -043 YYT AUTO 91.4341-249.42 . Ii.s% • ` '.P 1I' .4/'•I1t 1.Itc .40 Y13Y249A !Yf!h:^-S 9TNER [OUIP i4dSt3-SYF V1 . •.44:.50 •••-EME •OP St1 './'4/R4 S3.49 A•St+ItIC1 PEf IIM1T R-U71-f aI-41 PAlfAt K1311 A/.WMf 141.'I .111.1Etrt P:S TI it 2!-Ud/•S4V. Rd -AMNL 214.14 •...CNS •���• frio".YI 'W,7'I TOTIL ;'WPAL IVMO I.W.3' -UW 41 19-,AL RCP.:WRCY! ASYILVIN'. P SS.'f -UYO 44 TOM 14I2 SICC ASSM%'%t Put 17P.aR •UY9 71 Mf41, LIOVIR 9f!RA!:M4 -U+O ' d. NC.tf -UYI 12 TOM OT:A OP•AAT!%6 'Al -M 14 TOTIL ;C+[+ Of !1Af:Y4 j%O •.NIS .'i ^!M. 14 TOM 5'L/ :IU.,E :P!P1'INS 10 114.251.-1 1i-41. - Planning Commission PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF OPONO MEETING DATE Zl-<CIM PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) ?�'A A TER5�7✓ 4416m danalsya, / 2. ���Of.C, tit ��� 1lPapct��„�� yc4lRb 3. "I k �c o. n" Q st 1 Y _ �. Q. 3o75 F-cv✓iet.)4ein !avw'n `I S60 9 _ 0. 1. QAMQS .GYa- -dt ,I 1 �NS41 IC 1(P10 p� 2. i✓N'E USSE6L / 337i (rt'YSrOY d/-lA/, %0/ 3. 1 P _ i p,: , iAd. 40fvt / ., 3 5 s O / 7.-� 45-7c [ a S. _ 8 8 0. Planning commission anti PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 1. 114r-4 '% SS R' 7RA aly 12 "'%O) 2. 6r,t �3s c. d ,tA 9�r901 _- 3. is 1l 4. 5. -Di C)c 6. .�✓ARA Sr Kt 3Lfc2 �� 90 7. B. a 390/ 9. 0. 1. 2. 3. .4 .S. .6. .7. ,8. L9. 10. I n-fo in d.+ l'ori -:1L +e...oM S Comn Lt NPR 81995 0 . OROW (Ac" Q�iitar� Q MeentiS and r � � g Agendas i0 s Y Suite 300, Metro Syumc Boil ding, St, Paul, Mtnocuaa i5101 -7 ,77" V K*2510 March 22, 1985 p� I WEEK OF MARCH 25 - 29 NOTE: This publication contains a one -week list of meetings and agenda items for the Metropolitan Council, its standing committees and advisory committees, as well as similar information for the Regional Transit Board. It is mailed every Friday to a contact person in the region's local governments and to the Twin Cities media. Meetings and agendas occasionally must be changed. For this reason, anyone planning to attend meetings should verify the information in advance. Call 291-6464 to do so. Media should continue to call Ken Reddick, 291- 6422, or Lynna Williams, 291-6511, for more information. Metro olitan Parks and 0 en S ace Commission - Monday, March 25, 4 p.m., ouncil hambP'S! he comm ssion wi consider an acquistion grant amendment for French Regional Park, ;'ennepin County; a development grant amendment for Lake Byllesby Regional Park, Dakota County; and a system plan revision reviewing the recreation services distribution mapping. The commission will also act on a resolution of appreciation for commission member Bill Barbeau. Metro o1itan S stems Committee - Monday, March 25, 4 p.m., Conference Rohm E. he committee w iscuss the final report from phase I of the independent management study of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC). The committee will also consider a metro plant air emissions facility permit; authorization for statement at a hearing on Minnesota Pollution Control Agency rules regulating sewage treatment grants; a MWCC request to amend the ?954-1988 development program and the Water Resource Management Development Guide plan for Excelsior Lif Station improvement; an environmental worksheet scoping document on Anoka County/Blaine Airport; and the interim Regional Transit Board implementation plan. Senate local and Urban Government Committee -Tuesday, March 26, 10 a.m., State Capitol, Room G- . The committee will hold a hearing on the metro governance bill. House Local and Urban Affairs Committee -Tuesday, March 26, noon, State Office ut ding, Roam he committee will hold a hearing on the Regional Transit Board finance and structure bill. A re ate Resources Committee - Tuesday, March 26, 3:30 p.m., Conference Room he Comm flee w consider preliminary findings addressing the part of its legislative charge on sufficiency of data. It will also hear a progress report on the permitted reserves update, a report from the technical subcommittee on field survey needs and cost estimates, and presentation and discussion of the issues and impacts of resource protection alternatives. House Local and Urban Affairs Committee - Wednesday, March 2/, noon, State Office Building, Room 200. The committee will hold a hearing on Regional Transit Board legislation. Regional Arts Forum - Wednesday, March 27, 1 p.m., Conference Room C. Regional Transit Board Polf�c Committee - Wednesday, March 27, 5 p.m., RTB Sff ce c cr onC Terence boom. The board will cons ider'tont inuat ion of the Metro Mobility evaluation and hear presentation from interested parties. It will also consider a Science Museum proposal and an update on a light rail transit RFP (request for proposal). Metro oli tan Parks and 0 en S ace Commission - Wednesday, March 27, 6:30 p.m., orev ew ty a . he commiss on w be briefed by implementing agencies -- Anoka, Ramsey and Washington Counties --on 10-year capital improvement programs. Senate Urban Government Subcommittee - Wednesday, March 27, 7 p.m., Dakota County Government Lenten oars Broom, Hastings. The subcommittee will hold a hearing on the metre governance bill. Ride-Sharin Executive Committee - Thursday, March 28, 8:30 a.m., Council ham er.. he committee wi 1 discuss the five-year work program. House Enviromn `. and Natural Resources Committee - Thursday March 28, 10 a.m., tatee. 1 ng, Room he committee will hold a hearing on the Merriam/Rose olid waste bill. Metro olitan and CMynit Develo meet Committee - Thursday, March 28, 1:30 P.M. ounc ambzrs. he committee wi consider the city of Spring Park's housing bond plan; the biennial art plan; the environmental assessment worksheet scoping document on the Homart office development in Bloomington; the summary of public hearing comments and final adoption of the long-term care report; and the approval of the 1985 annual implementation plan. It will also discuss revisions of the health systems plan. Metropolitan Council - Thursday, March 28, 4 p.m., Council Chambers. Report of the Metropolitan and Community Development Committee: Annual implementation plan for 1985 for the Metropolitan Health Planning Board; environmental assessment worksheet scoping document for Homart office development in Bloomington; city of Spring Park housing bond plan; Health Planning Board's legislative priorities; biennial arts plan. Report of the Metropolitan Systems Committee: Acquisition grant amendments for Medicine Lake and Eagle Lake Regional Parks in Hennepin County; amended master plan for Coon Rapids Dam Regional Park, Anoka County; development and acquistion grant amendment requests for Long Lake -Rush Lake Regional Park, Ramsey County; request for development grant amendment, Phalen-Keller Regional Park, St. Paul; development grant amendment for Como Zoo, St. Paul; metro plant air emissions facility permit; authorization for statement at a hearing on Minnesota Pollution Control Agency rules regulating sewage treatment grants; Metropolitan Waste Control Commission request to amend 1984-1988 development program and Water Resource Management Development Guide plan for Excelsior Lift Station improvement; Regional Transit Board interim implementation plan; environmental assessment worksheet scoping document for Anoka County/Blaine Airport. Report of the Management Committee: Approval of consultant for contract to assist in the conduct of a comparable worth/pay equity of all Council job classes; federal 1985 Health Planning work program (federal grant year: July 1, 1985 - June 30, 1986). F e. March 29, 1985 WEEK OF APRIL 1 - 5 5 L'5/L!�, 1985' � CITYO OORONOJ NOTE: This publication contains a one -week list of meetings and agenda items for the Metropolitan Council, its standing committees and advisory committees, as well as similar information for the Regional Transit Board. It is mailed every Friday to a contact person in the region's local governments and to une Twin Cities media. Meetings and agendas occasionally must be changed. For this reason, anyone planning to attend meetings should verify the information in advance. Call 291-6464 to do so. Media should continue to call Ken Reddick, 291- 6422, or Lynna Williams, 291-6511, for more information. Plannin Association Annual State Conference - March 31-April 2, Holiday Inn, t. oud. he con erence Is sponsore by the Minnesota Chapter of the American Planning Association and the Minnesota Planning Assn. Senate Trans ortation Committee - Monday, April 1, 10 a.m. State Capitol, Room 112. The committee will in d a hearing on Regional Transit Board legislation. (Tentative) Metro olitan S stems-ommittee - Monday, April 1, 4 p.m., Conference Room E. he commT ittee w7T:ons—i e n acquisition grant amendment for French Regional Park, Hennepin County; a development grant amendment for Lake Byllesby Regional Park, Dakota County; and the Metropolitan Airports Commission 1985-1986 capital improvement program. Rye ional anslt Board - Monday, April 1, 4:30 p.m., Council Chambers. The boar w Trhear a report from the Policy Committee on the science museum proposal. It will also hear a report from the Administration and Finance Committee on a contract amendment with Strgar-Roscoe Fausch, Inc; allocation of motor vehicle excise tat funds; review and revision of 1985 calander year budget and review of 1986 and 1987 projected budgets; furniture specifications/bids; and recommendations for appointment of planning manager and programs manager. House Local and Urban Affairs r mittee - Tuesday, April 2, 5 p.m. State Office Bui ng Room he committee will hold hearings on Regional Transit Board legislation, the Merriam/Rose tn''id waste bill and a bill on the watershed management alternative to combin,:d sewer overflow. (Tentative) �Metro olitan Waste Mana a Advisor CoCIttee-T+:esday, April 2, 2 p.m., unci hambers. hehambers. he tee wi 11 cons tiler abrugatton of a development limitation for Hennepin my solid waste landfill site D in Greenfield as requested by John Steinke. The committee will also review proposed exclusions from Hennepin County waste flow designation for Richards Asphalt Co., Waste Energy Systems and Reuter, Inc. It will also review Hennepin County's waste flow designation plan. rg ate Resources Advisor Committee - Tuesday, April 2, 3:30 p.m., Con erence oom he Comm ttee wi discuss the legislative charge requir ^� it to determine the need to protect aggregate resources and the level of protection desirable. Senate R riculture and Natural Resources Committee - Wednesday, April 3, 1 ptate apmto oom 112. The Committee wi hold a hearing on the regional parks and Department of Natural Resources bonding bill. (Tentative) Environmental Resources Committee - Wednesday, April 3, 4 p.m., Conference Room F The committee will hear a progress report from the Aggregate Resources Advisory Committee. it will also consider abrogation of development limitation for Hennepin County solid waste landfill site D in Greenfield as requested by John Steinke. The committee will also review requests for exclusion from Hennepin County waste flow designation for Richards Asphalt Co., Waste Energy Systems and Reuter, Inc. It will also review Hennepin County's waste flow designation plan. Metro of itan Parks and 0 en S ace Commission - Wednesday, April 3, 6:30 p. m., H yh l and Go f C ub. he commission will be briefed by implementing agencies-- City of St. Paul, Dakota County and Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board --on 10-year capital improvement programs. Chair's Advisory Committee - Wednesday, April 3, 7:30 p.m., Council Chambers. Governor's Taxicab Commission - Thursday, April 4, 8 a.m., Council Chambers. he commission will hear a legislative update and committee reports. Metro olitanRiver Corridors Study Committee - Thursday, April 4, 12:30 p.m., ton erenci a Room E. Metropolitan and Comrtmunit Develo ment Committee - Thursday, April 4, 1:30 P.M., Councr bombers. The committee will consider the City of Cottage Grove comprehensive plan amendment housing element, the City of Crystal housing bond plan, the City of White Bear Lake housing bond, a human services trends and issues report and health systems plan revisions relating to ambulatory surgery and acute hospital care. M ana ement Coittee - Thursday, April 4, 3 p.m., Council Cha�ioers. The committee w I:nncons der approval of the collateral for investments report, 1985 insurance coverage, the federal fiscal year 1986 developmental disabilities project grant application, the request to the state for regional recreation open space funds appropriated by the 1983 legislature, the Council's participation in Anoka County condemnation of temporary development rights of Thomas and Beverly Johnson for Anoka County candidate landfill site D and investment guidelines. The Com{ittee will also discuss the Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission year-end 1984 financial summary and the status of the planning Assistance grant program. Senate R riiture and Natural Resources Committee - Thursday, April 4, 7 p.m., tote ap Cuo oom he Commttee will hold a hearing on a bill for a no - interest loan program for separating combined sewers and sewage treatment grants. (Tentative) Report of the Environmental Resource Committee: Setting public meeting on Hennepin County resource recovery environmental assessment worksheet; setting public meeting on Ramsey/Washington Waste -to -Energy Project draft environmental impact statement; request by Egan Family Trust to lift development limitation, Anoka County candidate landfill site D, Oak Grove; request by Northwest Disposal to lift development limitation, Anoka County candidate landfill site D, Oak Grove. Report of the Chair: Appointment to the Transportation Advisory Board. The Council will also act on resolutions regarding the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan amendment to replan and rezone an area near County Road B and McMenemy St.; Metropolitan Waste Control Commission--1985 Capital Budget amendment for the combined sewer overflow study; Plymouth comprehensive plan amendment to relocate local parks and trails; Plymouth comprehensive plan amendment to change planned industrial to office space, near 1-494 and Hennepin County Road 15. Minnesota Planning Association Annual State Conference -Sunday, March 31 to ues ay, pr o iday nn, t, Gloud. The conference is sponsored by the Minnesota Chapter of the American Planning Association and the Minnesota Planning Association. April S. 1985 Iu 4L....APR WEEK OF APRIL 8 - 12 CIfY OF `' L 1 NOTE: This publication contains a one -week list of meetings and agenda items for the Metropolitan Council, its standing committees and advisory committees, as well as similar information for the Regional Transit Board. It is mailed every Friday to a contact person in the region's local governments and to the Twin Cities media. Meetings and agendas occasionally must be changed. For this reason, anyone planning to attend meetings should verify the information in advance. Call 291-6464 to do so. Media should continue to call Ken Reddick, 291- 6422, or Lynn& Williams, 291-6511, for more information. Health Vote Town Hall Neetin - Monday, April 8, 3:30 p.m., Northern States ewer Company, Nico et all, Minneapolis. Senator Lave Durenberger will give the keynote address at this discussion of "Health Care in the Marketplace: Is Cost Control Reducing Quality?". Metro olitan Parks and 0 en S ace Commission - Monday, April 8, 4 p.m., Council ambers. he commiss on wi review the Miesville Ravine Park Reserve master plan and the development grant amendment for Sprinq Lake Park Reserve, Dakota County. It will discuss issues related to grant contract cost overruns and use of agency -earned i,; erest funds. It will be briefed on the preliminary report from the consultant for the Minnesota Holmenkollen study team. Metropolitan Committee - Monday, April 8, 4 p,m., Conference Room E. The committee wi ac—f� ton a change in the 1984-1988 development program for the Blaine sewer interceptor project, aircraft noise abatement policies, Hiawatha Av. final EIS/4(f) evaluation and alternatives analysis and the Metropolitan Airports Commission's 1985-1986 capital iimprovement program. Joint Meetin of Ccunc it Members and Parks <,.' en Space Commissioners - on ay, ri p.m., t.Paul Hotel. Deve to men tat Disabilities Advisor Committee -Tuesday, April 9, 1 p.m., ounci hambers. he comm ttee w a so aiscuss the Health Vote, hear a report on the Developmental Disabilities Volunteer of the Year award and select the recommended priority services for the state three-year developmental disabilities plan. Legf slative Hearin, (Tentative - Tuesday, April 9, 12 noon, Room 200. State ce dg. Ouse a Local Affairs Committee: possible action on Regional Transit Board legislation. Deve to mental Disabilities Public Forum - Tuesday, April 9, 2:30 p.m., Council hambers. dward5kernulis, Ph.D., director of Minnesota's Division of Mental Retardation Services, will keynote. Legislative Hearin, (Tentative) - Tuesday, April 9, 3 p.m., Rope 10, State Office Old House Budget Committee: regional parks and Department of Natural Resources (DNR) bonding request. Le islative rl Heanng (Tentative; - Wednesday, April 10, 8 a.m., Room 120. Capito% fenate Finance Subcommittee )n State Departments: regional parks and DNR bonding request; hearing will continue at 3 p.m. that day on this bill, plus other requests; the subcommittee will also hear combined sewer overflow financing proposals. Metro MR A Advisor Committee - Wednesday, April 10, 9 a.m., HRA Conference oom, Lower Leve 2 . he committee will hear a Health Vote presentation and the progress report on the metropolitan housing fund and the grants proposal. It will also discuss the recommendation for approval of revised program objectives and guidelines for the metropolitan huusing fund. Metro olltan Health Plannin Board - Wednesday, April 10, 3:30 p.m., Council Na e'%. he oard w11 he the following reports. Planning Committee: review of revised Health Systems Plan Chapter 1; revised inpatient pediatric component. Legislative Committee: nursing home principles; MA. Health Dept.'s cost containment bill. Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission - Wednesday, April 10, 6:30 p.m., Scott ounty Government enter. he commission will be briefed by implementing agencies -- Carver County, City of Bloomington and Hennepin County Park Reserve District -- on the 10-year parks capital improvement programs. Governor's Taxicab Commission - Thursday, April 11, 8 a.m., Council Chambers. the commss on w ear the legislative update and committee report. Metro olitan Council - Thursday, April 11, 4 p.m., Council Chambers. etropo tan and n ommunity Development Committee Items: adoption of long-term care report Resha in Lor. -Term Care in the Metropolitan Area: Recommendations for�Change., an recngn it on of the contr bu tSons of the tas force; Crystal housing bond plan; White Bear Lake housing bond plan. Cottage Grove comprehensive plan amendment. Metropolitan Systems Committee items: acquisition grant amendment for French Regional Park; development grant amendment for Lake Byllesby Regional Park; Hiawatha Avenue final EIS 4 (f) evaluation and alternatives analysts; Metropolitan Airports Commission's 1985-86 capital improvement program. Management Committee items: investment guidelines; approval of collateral for investments; 1985 insurance coverage; federal fiscal year 1986 developmental disabilities demonstration project grant application; request to state for regional recreation open space funds appropriated by the 1983 Legislature; participation in Anoka County condemnation of temporary development rights of Thomas and Beverly Johnson (Anoka County candidate landfill site 0). Environmental Resources Committee items: abrogation of development limitation, Hennepin County landfill site 0. Chair reports: appointments to the Minority Issues Advisory Committee, the Metropolitan Health Planning Board and the Metropolitan HRA Advisory Committee. Legislative Liaison: status repot on legislative initiatives. Aviation Poilc Plan Task Force - Friday, April 12, 9 a.m., Council Chambers. —taskTW orce w cont nue is discussion on the Aviation Policy Plan update and discuss clustering tall toners and airport classification characteristics. Council Members 8-,d et__ _t - 6. P. Friday. April 12 to Saturday, April IS ort tar inn, Minneapolis. The Council will begin discussion of its 1986 work program and budget. Lab E. Shenmeh Dmbel Seiei Manage, - E.vmm Av 21gl Lama Aeehue Mram_1.�m Fan Lee. New eey 0102e TowpIpro(201)1a15Ee5 p/T�� MIYII+M. Na NATpl eaa NM NI ANoa_SLNoto _ INTERNATIONAL CUMMNY � � p 91995 i nertn 1985 Uear Colleague, 'i CITY OF 011(.. I wrote to many of you in a out the budget problems facing the EPA Clean Lakes Program (ULP). Since that time, we have successfully informed our elected representatives in the Congress about the need for this important pro- gram and the value 1t has to the protection of our vital lake resources. 'ihey have responded by making sure EPA had funding available to keep this program viable. This is due to YOUR INVOLVEMENT. As we all know, this is a very difficult budget year for many of the federally sponsored programs, and of course the CLP is not being supported in the Reagan Administration budget request. If the CLP is to receive any funding support in fiscal year 1986 (starts 10/85), it will be as a result of again our COLLECTIVE- LY INFORMING and CONVINCING our congressional representatives that this contin- ues to be a very worthwhile program --one that MUST be continued! We need to continue our efforts to inform Congress. Right now, Important bud- get decisions are being made. The House and Senate Subcommittees on HUD and Independent Agencies are markleg up the budget proposals. Final hearings for public witnesses will take place in late April, and the North American Lake Management Society (HALMS) will be presenting strong testimony in support of the CLP and the Non Point Pollution Control Program of EPA. In order for those state- ments to be effective, the Subcommittees need to hear from every one of us----- RIGHTNUWIII WHITE THLM!!! CALL THEW !, WIRE TMEMIII LET THEM KNlaf HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT THIS ISSUE Enclosed Is a sheet listing the membership of the committees. It your represen- tative is involved, write to him. if not, write to the Chairmen with a copy to your elected ofticfals with a short note. Also enclosed is a tact sheet on the CLP you my find helpful. It you keep your LAKELINES, there is a wealth of information for reference in developing your let- ter. I would urge you to include the following: e Request that the CLP be level funded ($5,000,OUO) • Advise than that you do NOT went to see any restrictions on the was of the grant funding; in the past, EPA has only supported the completion of projects already In the construction phase e Indicate that a modest am of funding should be designated to support staff at EPA headquarters and the regional oftices. With personnel, technical help 1s provided and questions are answered e Make a special point that a minimum of S5OO,000 should oe mde available to continue the vital research work so that we can understand lake pollu- tion problem better and publish technical information. a EPA still has not published the Clean Lakes mnual that the Conk'Less pro- vided funding for in Fiscal year 1984 Thanks for your sunport. if we all pitch 1n, we can make this another uccecsful year for Clean Lakeal Sim Y. Lout Shemmn LF-h: in Dist ict Sales Mgr. -Eastern F.nrlc. - 7 Louis E Shenmen O un,l Sauee Man.,., - Eastern 2331 Lemo,ne Avenue Forl Lee. Now Jersey 0702e e r Telephone (201) a61-5665 MUD CAT ;„aesE„ULI INTERNATIONAL COMPANY THE CLEAN LAKES PROGRAM Section 914 of the Clean hater Act I M P A C 'l OF tit) r U N D i N G A Is 4 A A a ,. L • a Or k e A k A Is _CLNEEAL _BACKCROONu Since making, its first award to January 1976, EeA's Clean Lakes Program (CLP) has evolved into a program that is now in a post rn to meet its stated objectives: s Ensuring that the states are prepared — manage their freshwater lakes, an.' • Restore at least one lake to recreational quality within 15 miles of each standard metropolitan statistical area The success has been due to a number of factors: • The alarming rate at which the nation's lakes are continuing to degrade • The program is initiated at the grass routs level and and requires a strong local commitment (50% match) • It is voluntarv--not required by law or regulation, and it gets the job done! Emphasizing an overall watershed approach, Clean Lakes projects prevent soil erosion and thus sedimants and excess nutrients from filling in and "aging," the lake; toxics and organlcs are kept out of the waters; water supplies are improved; recreation is increased. This is EPA's only existing program to implement nonpoint source controls. RESULTS To date, 45 States have participated In the program and over $70 million has been awarded. A.nnroxlmetely six states now have specific legislatively derived lake res- toration and protection programs. A recent survey by the North American Lake Management Society (NALMS) Indicates that most states are willing to pursue the development of such programs. The benefits have been well -doe umanted.... nearly 150 lakes have been restored with public benefits greater than elghL dollars for each EPA dollar invested. Approximately 100 million Americans enjoy cleaner lakes, water Is free of sediment, weed, and pollutants. Concerned citizens have proven that the voluntary clean-up of our most valuable resources --freshwater lakes ---WORKS!!! And, it only costs each American a dimar per year at full fundiag support of $15 million annually. FUTURE NEEDS Over 10,000 lakes .re in need of restoration and protection, and others are continu- ally being degraded. Those lakes cannot be taken for granted; efforts to restore and oreurve them must go on. Otherwise, NO SWIMMING, NO DRINKING and NO BOATING signs will continue to appear on the landscape. SO WHAT' Lou&E Shammed D,mc, Sera Manspw- Eastern till Lammers Benue M14161V Fort Lee, Now Jersey T mpnons 11011 ae r-M 552a MUD r!p" ANmN"melm mN"mmT LCOMPANY THE CLEAN LAKES PROGRAM Section 314 of the flee. Hater Act I M PAC 'I OF tit) FUND LNG R e a e e e • A a. • e e a a A a GENERAL BACKGROUND Since making its first award 1n January 1976, EPA', Clean Lakes Program tCLP) has evolved into a program that 1s now 1n a position to meet Its stated objectives: • Ensuring that the states are prepared to manage their freshwater lakes, an!. • Restore at least one lake to recreational quality within 25 miles of each standard metropolitan statistical area The success has been due to a number of factors: • The alarming rate at which the nation's lakes are continuing to degrade • The program Is Initiated at the erase roots level and and requires a strong local Commitment (50% match) • It in voluntary --not required by law or regulation, and 1t gets tl,e job done! Emphasising, an overall watershed approach, Clean Lakes projecte prevent soil erosion and thus sedimentss and excess nutrients from filling in and "aging" the lake; toxics and organics are kept out of the waters; water supplies are Improved; recreation is increased. This is EPA's only existing program to Implement nonpolnt source controls. RESULTS To date, 45 States have participated in the program and over $70 million has been awarded. Annroximataly six states now have specific legislatively derived lake res- toration and protection programs. A recent survey by the North American Lake Management Society (HALMS) indicates that most states are willing to pursue the development of such programs. The benefits have been well-docmented.... nearly 150 lakes have been restored with public benefit, greater than eight dollars for each EPA dollar invoiced. Approximately 100 million Americans enjoy cleaner lakes, water 16 frec of sediment, weed, and pollutants. Concerned citizens have proven that the voluntary clean-up of our most valuable resources--freahwatar lakS.---WORKSIII And, it or:ly costs each American a dimer per year at full funding support of $15 million annually. FUTURE NEEDS Over 10,000 lakes are in need of restoration and protection, and others are continu- ally being degraded. Th", lakes cannot be taken for granted; efforts to restore and preserve these must go on. Otherwise, NO SWIMMING, NO DRINKING and NO BOATING signs will continue to appear on the landscape. J9 Wiwi Americans want to clean up their lakes. Thev chink a dime of their Federal tax la not an exorbitant price to pay annually to make sure that this nation .betel.. the integrity and value of its freshwater lake hariuga. What good 1n a strong "tio"1 defense when there Ix nothing left back home to protect? Demand for funds has increased deamstiully--more than double the appropriation In the last few yams.. Without Federal soaLance, the States' Initiatives will be lost, v311 flounder and collapse. Our lakes will be in jeopardy. gut" had hopW that this program would be put back on track. They have no that "Poetry or t echniul whe r.-with-all to pick up this program In the next fw years, much Jose Cho next six moothal $50 million in ongoing restoration projects would be to don- gor of ewer seeing Completion and approximately 100 diagnostic/faaLLbill.ty Studio, can mo longer emp"t restoration money. Wltb"t funds, the dogradation of our lakes will continue, and rho science, and tech- molegy dwolopment to d"1 with this terrible problem will stagnate, U.S. (louse of Reprusentatives COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND STAFF AMIIOIAMTIONe SUBCOMMITTEE ON HUD —INDEPENDENT AGENCIES H143 CAPITOL_._ .................................. 225.3241 Edward P. BolaM, Mess., CMIrm6n Bob Tresler, Mich. B3 Green, N.Y. Louie Stokes. Ohio Caarerrca COlpnh'L Pa. Lindy (Mrs, Hale) Boggs. Le. J*" LaayA Calif. Martin Oleo Saba. Minn. Bill Boner, Tenn. mortssosrA erur slebw, Aichud N $71 Afarw1e3..............53241 T"tion, Paul E STr Ass+ eu3....... _... _...-W..._........ 53261 AM. Doiwk T M ASST slag._..--- ....................... 63341 ,reran slur MJe3iko. Geyl STf Altar 1016....... ._. __--- .... .......... �..._.._ filial Hailing Address: Honorable (fill in Anse of Representative) Subcommittee on HUD - Independent Agencies H 143 Capitol Washington, D.C. 20515 U.S. Snsate SUBCOMMITTEE ON HU04NDEPEUDENT AGENCIES SD-123......... -....... __ ............................... 224-72 f 0 Jake Gam, Utah, Chairman. 1.0we2 P. Weicker, Jr.. Corm Paul Loath, Nee, John C sn, n Miss Minima, M. D'Amato, N.V. Mutual P'"unwi, Wie. James Abdul S. Oak. Penick J Lemi Vt. Pete V. Donrenici, N. all". Jrm Sesser, Terw,. Meiling Address: Honorable (fill in name of Senator) Subcommittee on HUD - Independent Agencies SD-123 Washington, D.C. 20510 March 22, 1985 !��'1 <<•101 (;�T� �F 01(Gi�10 tl''°n'��•1 ��• 16121 291 6359 ipolitan Area Citizens and Governmentai Officials SIL...c. . Adoption of Solid Waste Management Development Guioe/Policy Plan and FinT$taten�ent oti= n logs and Conclusions The Metropolitan Council on Mar. 14, 1985, adopted the new Solid Waste Management Development Guide/Policy Plan and a final statement of find- ngs an coot us ons regarding pu is hearing comments made on the guide. Enclosed are copies of the final statement and a summary of the guide. They are being sent to you until the guide, incorporating all the changes approved by the Council, can be made available. One of those changes in the guide was to allow voluntary participation in source separation programs before determining whether a mandatory approach is needed. If by Jan. 1, 1988, voluntary efforts of cities, townships and counties have not achieved the Council's objectives for waste reduction and source separation, mandatory source separation would go into effect by July 1, 1988. The new guide also requires: - A ban on landfilling of compostable waste (such as leaves and grass clippings), recyclables (such as newspapers, cans and glass) and combustible solid waste after 1990; - The opening of up to three new landfills intended to accept only residuals remaining after waste has been processed; - Establishment of region -wide programs for public education and participation and for developing markets for recovered materials and energy. The Council appreciates very much the comments and direction given by citizens, officials and others on the guide. Seventy-two persons pro- vided testimony for the public hearing record and over 500 pages of written and oral comments were provided. The response helped make the guide a better document and shows the importance of solid waste manage- ment to the Metropolitan Area. Copies of the guide will be available toward the end of April. Ques- tions about the new guide can be directed to Paul Smith at 291-6408. Sincerely, - � 1 5 era S Ga�ri � Chair SSG:sje SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT GUIDE/POLICY PLAN NM ALA —STATEMENT AND CONCLUSIONS This report is a final statement of findings and conclusions regarding the Solid Waste Management Development Guide/Policy Plan adopted by the Metropol- itan ounC ciI%F C4, i4A5. he report escr� the major issues raised at a Jan. 28, 1985, public hearing on the policy plan and in written comments (received through Feb. 12, 1985). It also includes findings about the need and authority for the plan, and conclusions about revising the plan based on the public hearing comments. Available as separate documents are: 1) the hearing report, which responds to the issues raised and makes recommendations for changes to the plan, and 2) the hearing record, containing a summary of the hearing oral testimony arts the written comments received. They can be obtained by contacting the Council"s Communications Department at 291-6464. AUTHORITY Minn. Stat. 473.149, as amended, requires the Council to prepare and adopt as part of its Metro otitan Deve to ment Guide, a long-range policy plan for solid waste managemen n e etroDa an Area. The Waste Management Act of 1980, as amended, requires that the Council amend its plan, by Jan. 1, 1985, to include an abatement plan and a landfill development schedule. The abatement plan must include specific and quantifiable objectives for abating to the great- est feasible and prudent extent the need for and practice of land disposal of mixed municipal waste through the year 2000. The abatement plan must include standards and procedures to determine whether counties or cities have imple- mented the plan. The landfill development schedule must specify the number and capacity of landfill sites from a metropolitan inventory to be acquired by the metropolitan counties. The schedule must be based on the reduced estimate of capacity as determined by the abatement plan. MAJOR ISSUES AND RESPONSES The hearing report recommends clarification and expansion of the text of the guide in response to many of the hearing comments. Two changes in policy word- ing are recommended, but overall there are no substantive changes to the guide. It is recommended that the guide's basic policy structure, abatement objec- tives, most time schedules and planning requirements remain unchanged. Although the hearing raised a number of issues, considerable public support has been expressed for the guide's new direction and aggressive approach. The pub- lic, on the whole, wants a change in the waste management system and is suppor- tive of alternatives to landfills. Moreover, the public appears to want govern- ment to continue to take an aggressive role in waste management. One important policy area recommended for change is the proposal to implement region -wide mandatory source separation after 1987. Considerable response was received regarding the proposal. Cities and counties, in particular, felt the proposal is premature and that a voluntary approach should be tried first. Con- cern focused primarily on financing, enforcement and market issues. In response, the hearing report recommends that as an into -mediate step perfor- mance h-cessed on a voluntary participation basis. Mandatory participation could vgered as a second step if voluntary efforts are not working. Modest changes are recommended for the landfill development schedule. Clarifi- cation is given in response to questions about how private proposals can substi- tute for the schedule's allocations and to clarify what alternatives would be available if all of a county's inventory sites proved to be unpermittable. Economic concerns were also key issues. Some respondents said the guide should allow for more competition and place less responsibility on the public. sector. Concern was expressed, in particular, that waste designation would have monopo- listic effects on waste management services. Also, a number of respondents said there should be more in the way of cost incentives for waste generators to recycle and reduce waste. The hearing report responds to these issues and no major changes are recommended to the guide. Organized collection, incentives and other issues will require further analysis as the guide is implemented which may lead to recommendations for future legislative change. These issues do not affect adoption of the guide and its policy structure at this time. Finally, there were several comments regarding the proposal to have the coun- ties implement a hazardous substances separation program. Concern was expressed that the program is premature and requires further analysis. It is recommended, therefore, that the date for having the program in place be moved from 1988 to 1990 and that the implementing responsibility be left open until further work on the subject has been completed by the Waste Management Board (WMB) and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). FINDINGS 1. The Waste Management Art V 1980, as amended, requires that the Council adopt a land disposal abatement element as part of its solid waste policy plan. The Act requ'res that the Council include specific and quantifiable objectives for abating to the maximum feasible and prudent er t the need for land disposal of mixed municipal solid waste and of spec) components of the waste stream. The plan must include reduced estimates of added solid waste disposal capacity needed, measurable objectives for local abate- ment standards for measuring implementation of the plan. The Act further requires that the Council determine the number of sites and the capacity of sites to be acquired within each metropolitan county, together with a sched- ule of disposal capacity to be developed within each county. 2. in order to inform its Judgment respecting its solid waste development guide/policy plan, the Council held a public hearing on a draft of the plan on Jan. 28, 1985. 3. Feasible and prudent alternatives to the practice of landfilling mixed municipal solid waste exist, but have not been ' demented. 4. Governmental entities and private persons generally support the proposed shift away from the practice of land disposal of unprocessed mixed munici- pal solid waste toward the practice of limiting land disposal to processed residuals. S. Governmental entities and private persons support the implementation of vol- untary source separation of recyclable materials, as a way of decreasing dependence upon landfilling. 6. The public generally supports a more aggressive effort by regional and local goverment to ensure that the shift away from landfilling can occur. CONCLUSIONS 1. The guide's basic policy structure, abatement objectives, most time sched- ules and planning requirements should remain unchanged. 2. An intermediate step should be used to assess source separation on a volun- tary participation basis. Mandatory participation should be triggered as a second step if voluntary efforts are not working. 3. The date for having a household hazardous waste separation program should be changed to 1990 and the implementing responsibility should be left unde- fined until further work is completed by the NMB and WCA. 4. Other changes should be made to provide clarification and expansion to the text of the guide as the hearing report recommends. SUMMARY OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT DEV�LOPMENT GUIDE/POLICY PLAN INTRODUCTION The guide is a plan for managing the Metropolitan Area's solid waste well past the year 20DO. It calls for developing a regional system of composting and recycling services, centralized processing facilities and transfer stations (drop-off points for waste subsequently taken to processing facilities). It is aimed at carrying out state and federal requirements for proper waste management, and emphasizes recovering usable materials and energy from waste while minimizing the use of landfills. BACKGROUND The seven -county Metropolitan Area generates nearly 5,500 tons of municipal solid waste daily. Municipal waste consists of paper, food waste, yard waste, glass, metals and other miscellaneous materials collected from residential, commercial and industrial sources. About two-thirds is generated by households and businesses; industry generates the remainder. Ninety-five percent of the region's municipal waste goes to landfills. An estimated eight percent goes to landfills in counties bordering the seven - county area. About 87 percent goes to eight landfills currently operating in the area. Estimates of the amount that is recycled or otherwise recovered range from three to seven percent, but little reliable data is available. If the region continues its current, heavy reliance on landfills with no increase In recycling, it would possibly need as many as 15 new landfills. The health and environmental consequences of land disposal of waste have been Increasingly documented in recent years. Damages can occur in the form of sur- face and groundwater contamination, air pollutant emissions, fires, explosions, food chain contamination, noise and odors. All of the landfills that have operated in the Metropolitan Area since 1970 are contributing to environmental or potential health problems. Incidents include contamination of surface water, methane gas migration, and nuisances such as litter, noise and odor. Groundwater contamination has been detected at all sites, with varying degrees of severity. AUTHORITY In response to this situation, the 1980 Minnesota Legislature passed the state Waste Management Act, significantly increasing the Metropolitan Council's responsibility for solid waste management in the Metropolitan Area. This act charged the Council with providing a long-range plan for managing solid waste in the region that provides for the reduction of waste, recovery of materials and energy and minimizes the practice of land disposal. The act requires the plan to set regional waste management policy and provide schedules for develop- ing waste facilities and activities to manage solid waste through the year 20DO. This guide responds to the 1980 directive. It replaces the solid waste manage- ment chapter of the Council's Metro olitan Develo nt Guide that the Council adopted in 1979 and amended in he o id Waste OR ement Development Guide/Policy Plan is one chapter of the Me r000 tan eve opment bulde. GENERAL APPROACH OF THE GUIDE The regional system envisioned in the guide is intended to reduce the region's reliance on land disposal by maximizing the recovery of energy and materials from solid waste and reducing wastes at the source as much as possible. The system would draw on several different approaches to manage solid waste. They include include waste reduction, source separation, energy and materials processing, and land disposal. Waste reduction involves methods to cut back the amount of waste generated in the first place. Source separation involves sorting waste where it is generated so reusable materials can be marketed or processed more readily. Processing for energy and materials recovery consists of methods that transform materials into a usable, marketable product or burn them for heat energy. Land disposal --depositing waste in or on the land --would be a last resort, used only for residual materials left over from recycling or processing. These approaches will play different roles in a new regional waste management system, but all will be necessary to a greater or 1psser degree to deal with the region's solid waste properly, effectively and comprehensively. WHAT THE GUIDE PROPOSES The guide calls for halting the practice of burying mixed municipal waste in landfills after 1990. Only the nonrecoverable residuals remaining from waste processing would be landfilled after that date. Processing would include recovering recyclable materials, burning waste for heat energy and composting organic waste to produce a useful soil conditioner. The plan requires that, by July 1, 1988, generators of municipal solid waste must separate recyclables and compostable yard waste from other waste only if voluntary efforts have not achieved the objectives set by the Council. Recy- clahles include paper, glass, metals and automobile oil and batteries. Compos- tablt yard waste includes leaves, grass clippings and other organic waste from lawn snd garden maintence. To make this effort successful, counties, cities and townships need to provide recycling services for these materials over the next three years. The guide would require, by 1986, establishing centrally coordinated programs for public education and participation and for developing markets for recovered materials and energy. The Metropolitan Council would assume the major responsi- bility for establishing these programs, but other groups, particularly the counties and state agencies, would be involved as well. The plan sets ambitious goals for waste reduction and recovery. By 1990, waste reduction activities would cut back the amount of solid waste generated by about four percent. Source separation programs would recover about 16 per- cent. Centralized processing, which includes waste combustion, materials recovery and co -composting, would handle about 80 percent. The guide says that three new landfill facilities will need to opened in the region. It requires Anoka County to open a facility in 1987; Hennepin County, a second in 1991; and Washington County, a third in 1993. These facilities would accept only processed residuals or special wastes like construction debris. The guide sets a ceiling on the amount of new landfill capacity that can be developed. The plan urges establishing "organized" collection of trash. Most of the region's municipal waste is now collected under an "open" arrangement where each waste generator (a household, for example) purchases collection service directly from a waste hauling firm. Under an organized system, exclusive collection areas would be assigned to haulers so they would have more customers in a relatively smaller area. The net result would be savings in transporta- tion costs, less truck traffic in residential areas and, with reliable pickup service available for recycables, better assurance that recycling programs will succeed. The guide also encourages counties to join together to develop large-scale processing facilities. Such facilities will need to draw on waste from areas that don't necessary conform to county boundaries. As a result, counties will need to cooperate to help ensure the facilities' success. COSTS OF DEVELOPING THE NEW REGIONAL SYSTEM The cost of developing a new regional system for solid waste management is estimated at S345 million. This includes the cost of centralized processing facilities, startup costs for recycling and composting programs and the cost of several new landfills to handle waste that can't be recovered. Households in the region pay on the average about $105 a year for getting rid of their trash under the existing system. By 1990, those costs could increase by $20 to S40 annually. ALTERNATIVES THAT WERE CONSIDERED WASTE REDUCTION AND SOURCE SEPARATION Waste reduction and source separation are often referred to as low -technology approaches because they usually require only a small capital investment, have the flexibility to respond to change and involve the participation of those who generate waste. It is difficult to determine how much of the region's waste could be diverted from landfilling through waste reduction methods, but they would probably account for only a few percentage points. Several industries, public institu- tions and other organizations are already carrying out waste reduction activi- ties to reduce costs. However, many manufacturing processes cannot produce completely recyclable or reusable products, and waste generators frequently do not know about opportunities for reducing waste at the source. Waste reduction also has major institutional barriers to overcome. A full- scale effort requires new federal or state legislation aimed at reducing waste produced by specific industries. Such legislation generally takes years to pass, and only after the full economic consequences and benefits are known. For these reasons, many waste reduction efforts are beyond the capabilities of local governmental units to implement. It is likely, however, that waste reduction efforts will expand somewhat with- out legislation or major advances in technology. Waste reduction will occur if 1) the opportunities for conservation are recognized and 2) there are economic incentives to do so. To promote such efforts, the regional strategy emphasis reduction methods that are administratively simple to implement. Such programs include consumer education and awareness, office paper reuse, yard -waste mulching and govern- mental purchasing practices favoring reduction. Particular focus should be on awareness and education programs that emphasize the benefits of waste reduction. Historically, almost all recovery has taken place by hand -separating the wastes where they are generated (such as households and offices), then transporting and selling the recovered materials. Technologically, this process is rela- tively simple and has a good potential for dealing with a substantial percent- age of the region's waste. The main obstacles to implementing source separation have beer. economic. Separ- ation programs simply have not been able to compete with land disposal with its artificially low costs. Moreover, source separation programs have always depended on the voluntary participation of waste generators, and any cost sav- ings have usually not been large enough to encourage most generators to partici- pate. In addition, there has often been a lack of coordination among different recycling efforts and sometimes unreliable service. Immediate priority should go to separating yard waste that can be composted and recyclable materials from mixed municipal waste. Indications are that source separation programs could be available throughout most of the region within two to three years. Within five years, enough households and businesses could be participating in waste separation programs to achieve a very substantial reduc- tion in wastes otherwise destined for landfills. CENTRALIZED PROCESSING The options available through use of centralized processing facilities include materials recovery, waste combustion and co -composting (the composting of mixed waste with a material that is high in nitrogen such as sewage sludge). Central- ized processing is generally referred to as a high-technology approach, because compared with other methods, it uses more expensive equipment and facilities; its operating costs are typically higher; it requires long-term financing and commitments for waste supply, and is less flexible to convert to other technol- ogies. The major advantage of the approach, though, is the ability to reliably process large quantities of waste in a short period of time. The technology of recovering materials at centralized processing facilites is well established. Shredding, magnetic separation of metals, air classification (using a blast of air to separate materials according to their weight) and simi- lar techniques have been successfully used for a number of years. This tech- nology can extract recyclable materials, process recyclables previously sepa-, rated at the source and reduce the total volume of waste. It can also be adapted to produce refuse -derived fuel (RDF) for combustion or supplemental material for co -composting. Materials recovery at centralized facilities has good possibilities in the Metropolitan Area, particularly if the technology is used with other processing methods. As previously mentioned, similar equipment can be used to accomplish a number of purposes. Centralized materials recovery can also serve as a backup if source -separation approaches do not meet anticipated objectives. Waste combustion must play a key role in the region's future waste management system. It could recover as much as 50 percent of the total solid waste gener- ated annually. Priority must go to developing a system of major combustion facilities that will be operational by 1990. Largp-scale facilities need to be built each capable of handling as much as 500 or m tons per day of mixed municipal waste. In general, large-scale facilities provide the potential for greater control of air emissions because they have higher combustion efficien- cies. These facilities will not be competitive in the short-term; therefore, they will require assurances of an adequate waste supply. The ROF technology Is more adaptable to the regional strategy because of its flexibility. Another form of centralized resource recovery is composting or co -composting of mixed solid wastes with materials high in nitrogen. Similar to backyard com- posting of yard waste, large composting facilities rely on the biological pro- cesses of microorganisms to break down the organic fraction of processed munic- ipal solid wastes. Composting facilities process the waste, using shredding and mechanical separation techniques similar to energy recovery facilities. The viability of composting plants depends on the markets for the final prod- uct. Centralized composting facility technologies include open 'windrow" systems (that is, piles of organic refuse that are turned using large road machinery) and enclosed systems where the oxygen and temperature levels are controlled. These types of resource recovery systems are more common in Europe than in the United States. Centralized composting is, however, increasingly being used in this country. Indications are that a number of markets exist in the region to use cm -compost products. Some question remains, however, regarding the competitiveness of the product with similar products currently being used. The University of Minne- sota, in cooperation with the Council, has begun a research and development pro- ject to determine the marketability of co -compost in the Metropolitan Area. The net effect of including co -composting in the regional strategy is to increase flexibility and lessen even further the amount of residuals requiring land disposal. The question about the marketability of compost should not by itself discount co -composting as an important part of the region's future waste management system. However, public subsidies may be required until a long-term market demand is developed. LAND DISPOSAL As a method of waste management, land disposal is a last resort. Waste reduc- tion and resource recovery are preferable methods, but ever. with land disposal there are factors to consider to minimize environmental and land use problems. Waste reduction and resource recovery are estimated to reduce significantly the need for land disposal but will not eliminate it entirely. Landfills for munic- ipal solid waste will be necessary on a short-term basis while reduction and recovery systems are developing. They will also be necessary for the residue from recovery operations. However, their use should be kept t0 an absolute minimum. Another factor is the type of waste materials that landfills accept. To date, there has been little effort to control the types of waste deposited in land- fills except for state prohibitions on hazardous wastes in 1973 and discarded tires effective in 1985. What the region requires, however, is a ban on the land disposal of "unprocessed" municipal waste after 1990. Unprocessed munici- pal waste includes materials that could be recycled, but have not been removed, and wastes that have not been stabilized by incineration or other processing methods. The technology is available to achieve a total ban, and it is economi- cally possible to have such services region -wide after 1990. Such a ban would allow only residuals from processing and recycling to go to landfills. SE1856-PHENV2 03.21.85 4, _ . A fMiLlllsO MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 18, 1994PR pA&BS ATTENDANCE 7:30 PM The Orono Planning Commission met �n thew@ Wgate with the following members present: ha rman Callahan, Kelley, Goetten, Rovegno, McDonald and Taylor. Sime was absent. Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron and Recorder Nash represented the City staff. Council Representative Grabek was absent. #894 T.N. CROSBY 745 SPRII4G HILL ROAD SUBDIVISION OF LOT LINE RP.ARRANGF14ENT CLASS I PUBLIC HEARING 7:30 - 7:40 PM T.M. Crosby was present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was no one present from the public for this application. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained Exhibits F1-F3. F1 being the existing property boundaries, F3 being the desired end point by split- ting the lots so the caretaker house is on a separate parcel with approximately 8 acres of dry land. The main house being on a separate parcel. F2 showing the way this can be done by rearranging lot lines. Mr. Crosby stated that the smaller parcel shown on the map will be given to the Winstons (who own property to the south) which will square off their property. Rovegno clarified that Parcels A, D and C wil l be one lot of record. Parcel B will be one lot of record. Gaffron clarified part of what is shown as designated wetlands is part of meandered lakeshore and therefore owned by the State of Minnesota. There is no point in requiring dedication since it is already essentially dedicated. Rovegno questioned why dedication ,f roadway was not requested at this time since there are three houses involved. Goetten stated that this could be added in the resolution that any further subdivision of any of the involved parcels would at that point be required to dedicate roadways. MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISLION MEETING HELD MARCH 18, 1985. PAGE 2 4894 T.X. CROSBY Goetten moved, ReI ley seconded, to recommena al prove? of the preliminary subdivision of lot line rearrange- ment for T.M. Crosby on Spring Hill Road subject to the following conditions: 1. Revise survey to show parcels per staff recommendation in Exhibit F-2. 2. The appropr?ate access easements to be granted to the appropriate properties. 3. Combination of rarcels A, C and D. 4. Flowage 6 Conservation Easement over Parcel A. 5. Dedication of platted road would be subject to any future subdivision. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the process to Mr. Crosby. Item 4 will require a Flowage i Conservation Easement over the wetlands area of Parcel A which would mean a required description of the bour?cries of the wetlands. Item 5 is saying at a future time when that property is platted down to its most intense zoning use, we would require a dedica- tion of the existing roadways. Motion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). 4895 T.N. CROSBY 1240 i 1260 BRACRETTS POINT ROAD SUBDIVISION OF LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT - CLASS I PUBLIC HEARING 7:45 - 7:58 PM T.M. Crosby was present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was no one present from the public for this application. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted this application is a lot line rearrangement. There are two parcels involved, one with an existing house on approximately .92 acre and adjacent properties total- ing 2.01 acres. The request is to make the smaller property a little larger and the larger property a little smaller. The properties are relatively low, in most places the ground is less than 5 feet above lake level. Soil testing has been done on the south- erly end of the Pillsbury property where they would need a specially designed mound septic system to make this buildable. It would fit within the setback requirements and would meet the City's codes. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 18, 1985. PAGE 3 i895 T.M. CROSBY Mr. Crosby explained they wish to acquire additional property because their lot is very small and the added property would be used for a dock and protection. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron asked for Zoning Administrator Mabusth's comments on taking a lot of over 2 acres (in a 2 acre zone) and breaking it down to a emaller lot and making the adjacent lot larger, thus making two substandard lots. Zoning Adminisrator Mabusth explained this is an acceptabl procedure as long as no harm is done to the original lot that you are taking land from, and if you are improving a substandard condition. There would be no new lot created or an unbuildable lot in an unsewered area. The septic testing has been done and found to meet all rural standards. Thus if you are assured you have a buildable lot you may rearrange lot lines to improve the substandard lots. Goetten stated her concern that by doing this you would be in a sense granting a variance on the newly created substandard lot. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the fact remains that you are improving a smaller lot building envelope and still not making the larger lot non - buildable. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that the floodplain area on the Pillsbury lot below 931.5 can't be filled or excavated without Council approval. Further study should be done on this area to tell if filling would be a problem. If a house is proposed to be built in 'his area, (encroaching on the floodpl ain), then a +w would have to be done. Assistant Zoning Administra, . Gaffron stated that by approving this lot line rearrangement you are pushing the building envelope on the Pillsbury lot further south, thus encroaching onto the floodplain. For future building a conditional use permit or variance would be needed. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the DNR would have to approve any fill within the floodplain. Chairmen Callahan reviewed the point that since you are taking away the highland on the Pillsbury lot, you are essentially forcing the future house t., to ld in the floodplain, whereas if the land were ls:,, as It is there would be no problem. MIMOM OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 18, 1985. PAGE 4 #895 T.M. CROSBY Chairman Callahan mov,d, Taylor seconded, to table the application for a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement for T.M. Crosby at 1240-12EO Brackett's Point Road until the April 15th meeting so Mr. Pillsbury can be made aware of the futu.:e building conditions. 1896 JAMES N. ANDERSON 2300 PDX STREET PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION CLASS Il PUBLIC NEARING 6:04 - 8:15 PM The two owners involved, Jim Anderson if 1900 Harbor Lane, Plymouth and Bill Levering of 2500 Woodhaven Drive were present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was no one present from the public. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that this is a request for a two lot subdivision, existing width of the property is 365. Required lot width in a 2 acre zone is 200', obviously without doing odd gerrymandering you won't jet 200' for both properties but there would be no a:eat benefit from doing this. Mr. Anderson noted that there is no other adjacent property to acquire. He also stated that this is the best way to subdivide because of the north section of the lot being wetlands area. Also, the land slope• from the front to the back of the lot. Taylor asked for clarification of further subdivision of the property in question. Mr. Anderson stated that there is already an easement over the wetlands from the original subdivision. Callahan expressed concern about 2 driveways coming out onto roadway. Mr. Anderson stated that the intention is to have one private driveway for both properties. Rovegno stated that this should be incorporated with- in the resolution. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 18, 1985. PAGE 5 4896 JAMES ANDERSON Rovegno moved, Taylor seconded, to recommend approval of the preliminary subdivision for James N. Anderson at property located at 2300 Fox Street subject to the following conditions: 1. ,gaff approval of the septic system testing inf..rmation. 2. Staff review and approval of the driveway access location. 3. Flowage 6 Conservation Easement over the designated wetland areas. 4. Standard drainage and utility easements. 5. Park fee in the amount of $200.00 for each new lot. Motion, Ayes (6). Mays (0`. 4897 JANET i CHUCK PETERSON 825 OLD LONG LAKE ROAD PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION CLASS II PUBLIC BEARING 6:36 - 6:41 PM ward Krueger was present to represent the applicants. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publica- tion. There was no one present from the public. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaff ron stated that this application it a subdivision of approximately a 4.4 acre parcel, excluding roadways. Thus making two lots of approximately 2.2 acres. The topography of this property makes this subdivision a logical division. Kelley noted that the houses would have to build behind the 200' lot width lire. Kelley also ques- tioned how many driveways wou a be incorporated. Mr. Krueger stated that two driveways would be implemented. Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to recommend approval of preliminary subdivision for Chuck a Janet Peterson for property located at 825 Old Long Lake Road sub- ject to the following conditions: 1. Septic testing approval for both the new lot and an alternate site for the existing house. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 18, 1985. PAGE 6 8897 CHOCK 4 JANET PETERSON 2. Inspection -and approval of the existing septic system for the existing house. 3. City Engineer/Public works Director review of the access locations. 4. Applicant to execute proper drainage and utility easements. 5. Dedication of roadway on the plat if not excluded in the legal description. 6. Standard park dei ion fee of $200.00 for the new lot. 7. Building envelope be at 200' wide or greater at the new building site. Motion, Ayes (6), Mayes (0). 4B76 RANDY ASPLUND 3424-3444 RASTLARE STREET VARIANCE Randy Asplund ras not present. The following neighbors were present: Esther Addison of 3382 Bayside Road Barbara Huber of 3190 Bayside Road Kathe Jukisk of 3280 Bayside Road Rovegno moved, Goetten seconFed, to recommend denia of the variance applications of Randy Asplund for the fence and the concrete patios within 75' of the lakeshore based on the fact that the applicant has demonstrated no hardship for basis of approval of the variance as was recommended at January 21, 1985 meeting. Chairman Callahan stated that this matter has come up again because the applicant had requested it because he couldn't make the previous meetings, therefore, even in his absence this matter will be acted upon. Motion, Ayes (6), Mayes (0). MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 18, 1985. PAGE 7 i889 EUGENE NELSON BIG ISLAND RECORD LOTS 16 i 22 SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT Jay T. Smedberg was present. There was no one pre- sent from the public for this application. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that this matter had been before the Planning Commission previously. There has been more research done to find out exactly what the property rights are for Big Island. This application is a proposal to divide the long lakeshore strip into two pieces, one that would be combined with Record Lot No. 22, one that would be combined with Lot 6, 7 and 8 and Lot C into Record Lct 16 and that does exist in the zoning code as Record Lot 16. The question was brought up last time was why is Lot C included with Record Lot 16, can it be or why can't it be a separate lot? Gaffron stated that in Section 10.31 of the code it specifically deals with future happenings on Record Lots, so that when a single party becomes owner of adjacent parcels of land '-hey become, from a zoning definition stand- point, r .ngle Record Lot, and that definition does include ,.rcels that are separated by a platted un- deve'oped right-of-way. Povegnc noted that the lot in question is not a record lot of anything. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that there is a mistake in the code, which should be corrected. Mr. Smedberg stated that the only request on his application was getting a separate tax number for the two pieces of land which are recorded as separate torrens property. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that he agrees that approval of the divisions appropriate, and delete the condition that Lot C combined as part of this division. He noted that for about half of the Big Island record lots, Resolutions have never been completed, dating back to 1983. He felt that if we give the applicants 6 months to resolve the paper- work for the automatic variances, if within 6 months this has not been completed they would loose the benefit of the automatic variance and would have to come in for a variance with the standard fees and possibly not be grsnted the variance. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 18, 1985. PAGE 8 4889 EUGENE NELSON Callahan moved, Kelley seconded, to recommend approval of the subdivision for Eugene Nelson for property located on Big Island, Record Lots 16 and 22, as it is requested subjert to the following conditions: 1. Parcel E must be combined with Lots 6, 7 and B. 2. Parcel A must be combined with Lots 9, 10 and 11. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron state-J that the reason the parcels must be combined in this manner is that the City will never allow a subdivision to create a new piece of land that is unbuildable where there is adjacent property in com- mon ownership that it is an integral part of. There- fore, a combination would be required. Motion, Ayes (6), Nayes (0). 4900 JAMS W. OGLAND RECORD LOT NO. 38 - BIG ISLAND VARIANCE - AFTER THE PACT PUBLIC HEARING 8:42 - 8148 PM James Ogland was present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate cf mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was no one present from the public for this application. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that Mr. Ogland is planning to build on his property, Big Island - Lots 25 & 26 Morse Island Park, and in reviewing the file it came to staff's attention that an illegal deck and small building had been constructed on the lakeshore sometime between the Summer of 1982 and September of 1983. (Gaffron pre- sented teh Planning Commission with photographs of the decking and shed, originals in Big Island file, Lot 38.) Gaffron stated these structures were built without permits. Gaffron noted that Mr. Ogland was requested to bring this matter in as an after -the - fact variance application or that he tear it down. Mr. Ogland stated that one reason the decking was built vas that the shoreline is very steep and muddy. Mr. Ogland noted that he had tried to plant grass but the property faces east and nothing would grow. Mr. Ogland did mention that there is a sand/dirt base under the deck, thus should not be considered hard- cover. Rovegno noted that in other cases where there has been a problem with a steep shoreline, the City has approved lock boxes. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 18, 1965. PAGE 9 #900 JAMBS W. OGLAND do ny e McDonaldmentionedthe alicant did land a landas dany avegetation grading remove and kept thet natural as possible. Kelley moved, Taylor seconded, to recommend approval for an after -the -fact variance for James W. Ogland for property located on Big Island, Record Lot 38 based on the following findings and conditions: 1. The applicant has shown a hardship to exist. 2. The applicant has not removed any vegetation. 3. The applicant be put on notice that no further development of hardcover in the 0-75' setback. Motion, Ayes (6), Nayes (0). #901 KARL P. JOHNSON 3393 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 8:55 - 10:02 PM Sherri 6 Karl Johnson were present. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. The following neighbors were present: Greg Long of 3359 Crystal Bay Road John Kust of 3355 Crystal Bay Road Aline Ogland of 3345 Crystal Bay Road Jay B. 4 Beverly J. Keiser of 3375 Crystal Bay Road Jerry wheeler of 3399 Crystal Bay Road Chairman Callahan read the petitions from the Plan- ning Commission packet oppos=ng the storage ordinance. The following signed such petition, which were submitted to staff and will he kept on file inthe zoning file 4901: Mr. i Mrs. Geo. A. Moss of 3335 Crystal Bay Road Richard Siakel of 3325 Crystal Ray Road Dick 4 Donna Carl of 3385 Crystal Bay Road Eunice 6 Bob Nichols of 3407 Crystal Bay Road Joseph R. Lofrand of 3365 Crystal Bay Road Karl F. Johnson of 3393 Crystal Bay Road Jay B. i Beverly J. Keiser of 3375 Crystal Bay Road Greg 4 Pam Long of 3359 Crystal Bay Road Dirie Lee Weeks of 3329 Crystal Bay Road Chairman Callahan read a letter, enclosed in the Planning Commission packet, from Dick i Donna Carl opposing the boat storage ordinance. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 18, 1985. PAGE 10 #901 EARL P. JOHNSON Chairman Callahan then read a letter from Jerry wheeler enclosed in the Planning Commission packet opposing the storage of Johnson's boat and the way City staff enforces the ordinances. Callahan read another letter sumbitted by wheeler (attached to these minutes, Exhibit A) which express his opinion regarding Johnson's variance request and the way staff and Council have dealt with this matter. Callahan read a letter written by Planning Commission member, Bill Sime, asking the Planning Commission to enforce the ordinances an deny Johnson's variance (letter attached to minutes, Exhibit B). Crystal Bay Road residents submitted a petition agreeing not to restrict any type or size of boat, nehicle and/or trailer within the confines of their property (original petition attached to minutes, Exhibit C). Kelley noted that the diagram provided by a neigh- boring property owner seems to indicate that the retaining wall is within the 75' setback. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that Karl Johnson did a sketch and the area calculations were done from a boundary survey done by Mark Gronberg a year ago. There is no certification of the 75' setback. Staff went out and took the tape and determin-d where the 75' setback area was. Planning Commissions may require at this point that the 75 feet setback line be certified by surveyor. Zoning Administrator Mabusth clarified the events surrounded by Sandra George application. The City staff went out to tag Mr. Johnson for excavation and found out the City was responsible for the moving of the dirt. Mr. Johnson had been given a stop work order back in 1982 for filling along the lakeshore. The fill was taken from a bank along the west aide of the house. At that time staff advised Mr. Johnsor to put in retaining walls to stop the erosic problem. Mr. Johnson noted that tie had come home one day and the City had put in rip rap along the lakeshore. Chairman Callahan stated according to staff's review the applicant has placed gravel over approximately 440 square feet of an area located within 75' of the lake. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 18, 1985. PAGE 11 #901 EARL F. JOHNSON Mr. Johnson commented that he feels that he has graveled less that 200' because there was a driveway already on the area in question. Therefore he feels that he hasn't added any hardcover that wasn't already there. Mr. Wheeler disputed that there was never a graveled driveway and submitted pictures to the Planning Commission showing no gravel taken about 2 years ago (pictures to be kept in zoning file i901). Chairman Callahan clarified that the applicant feels that he did not add hardcover because the driveway had already existed, from 30' back from the road to the retaining wall the applicant did excavate and put gravel where none was before. Kelley questioned whether the gravel is considered hardcover if it is driven on. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that the applicant claims this gravel is used for landscaping and erosion problems. Mabusth stated that there is a difference between gravel used as a base for a dri-e- way and gravel used in landscaping. Chairman Callahan suggested the Commission deal with this application in two separate parts. First the hardcover issue; part of the retaining wall is within the 75' setback area and it is within the 10' setback. However, the retaining wall was put in at the specific instruction of the staff. Rovegno moved, Kelley seconded, to recommend denial of a hardcover variance for Karl P. Johnson at 3393 Crystal Bay Road. Recommend removal of all gravel hardcover within the 0-75' setback area that was added in recent times based on the following findings: 1. Based on the evidence submitted and the pictures it appears that as of about 1982-83 there was no driveway serving the George house coming across that area. 2. This gravel is hardcover, it looks like driveway aggregate base. 3. Installed without a hardcover variance. Motion, Ayes (6), Hayes (0). MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NEW MARCH 18, 1985. PAGE 12 #901 KARL F. JOHNSON Rovegno stated that the next matter should be the 75' to 250' setback area. Presumably there is approximately 317' of hardcover in this area. If there is an excess of hardcover in this area, then whatever portion of the gravel area within th 75' to 250' setback area be removed. Rovegno moved, Callahan seconded, that if there is any hardcover within the 75' to 250' setback area, that should also be removed. Motion, Ayes (6), Nayes (0). Callahan moved on to the second half of the variance which included the retaining wall and excavation. Rovegno moved, Goetten seconded, to recommend approval of the retaining wall on the finding that staff did indeed recommend its placement at some point in the past, presuming it was beyond the 75' setback area and needed for erosion problems. Kelley also added that even if it is within the 10' side yard setback, this should be approved. Motion, Ayes (6), Hayes (0). Callahan moved on to the issue of the boat storage, which has already been discussed in previous matters before the Planning Commission. He also noted that a number of the petitions being circulated relate to the question of whether or not the boat ordinance itself ought to be changed, it is not the province of this group to decide whether an ordinance should be changed and it should not be discussed at this time. Mr. Johnson stated that he would like to leave the boat at its present spot and not be treated any different than anyone else in Orono. Kelley moved, Rovegno seconded, to recommend denial of the variance for Karl F. Johnson to permit the storage of an oversized boat on his residential property based on the following findings: 1. The applicant has indicated no hardships. Motion, Ayes (6), Hayes (0). Callahan noted for the record that no member of the Planning Commission appears to be in violation of the boat storage ordinance as was indicated in a letter submitted by Jerry Wheeler. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 18, -1985. PAGE 13 #901 EARL P. JOHNSON Mr. wheeler noted that he had also submitted to Council at their February 25, 1985 meeting a petition by residents of Orono who wish the ordinance to be enforced. f898 LEROY EEOHMEN 3360 SHORELINE DRIVE COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW Leroy Koehnen was present. Mr. Koehnen stated that he is requesting to put up a canopy on the east end of the building, add one extra underground tank and put in a single stall drive-thru car wash. The car wash would mean opening up the south side of the building with a door, lining up the cars so that they enter from the north and exit out the south doors which would enable them to enter on to County Road 19 or 15 or enter the alley and into the parking lot behind the building. McDonald asked if the Environmentalist-2 car wash would be used to conserve on water. Mr. Koehnen stated that he would be using fresh water method because of bad reports about recyling the water, thuL leaving in harmful salts and chemicals. Kelley questioned the status of an annual inspection of the field tanks. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that Thomas Jacobs, Building Inspector, handles all inspections involving Uniform Fire Code. Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to recommend approval of the commercial site plan by Leroy Koehnen for installation of fuel tank, canopy ever existing gas pump and installation of single stall car wash at service station at 3360 Shoreline Drive subject to the following conditions: 1. New tanks installed per standards of Minnesota State Fire Code. 2. Payment of $10,620.00 for total SAC and sewer unit payments with permit for installation of car wash. 3. Approval of se_back variance for canopy finding nothing detrimental to traffic visibility. 1. Traffic flow signage provided on site upon completion of car wash. 5. Field tanks and lines must be inspected every 3 years. Motion, Ayes (6), N+yes (0:. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 18, 1985. PAGE 14 #899 PAUL PHILLIPS 2160 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH SKETCH PLAN REVIEW Mr. c Mrs. Paul Phillips were present. Zoning Administrator Mabusth questioned the applicant about another division of the northern part of the land located in Medina. Mr. Phillips stated that they had purchased half of the parcel and that division would have to be resolved with the City of Medina. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that this is the first time that a subdivision would be seeking a minimum area credit by asking for crediting land in another City. Any other subdivision had always immediately satisfy the area standard within the City and remainder is just additional la..d. She noted that there should be no problem with this. The assessor has confirmed that there will have to be no separate PID or legal description. Majority of the lands will be credited to Orono. She noted that the accesses to the site were the only real problem to be resolved. Kelley stated that he had no problem with this proposed subdivision. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Chairman Callahan noted that the comments made by Lynn Adams to the Council at the February 25th Council meeting was that there had been a motion presented to the Planning Commission in relation to absenteeism. He noted that absenteeism is on the adgenda for the joint meeting to be held March 25, 1985. He also noted that to his recollection, there was a question raised about absenteeism but no motion was made regarding this issue and in fact it was ruled that it was not the Planning Commissions busi- ness. He wishes the minutes of February 19th to reflect this. Chairman Callahan also noted that Council had questioned the fact that only 3 members were present at the February 19th Planning Commission meeting and the validity of that meeting for that reason. City Attorney at that time suggested that there was no quorum. Callahan noted that Item 6 on the agenda for the joint meeting of March 25, 1985 is in regard to the quorum issue not absentee+.em. McDonald stated that the Planning Commission does not need a quorum because they are only a recommending body. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 18, 1985. PAGE 15 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the City Attorney noted that Robert's Rules of order defines any quorum for any group including the Planning Commission. Rovegno stated that Robert's Rules have never been adopted by the Planning Commission according to the ordinances. He also noted that they are following Robert's Rules because a quorum is defined in the rules only if a quorum is defined as being required. If it is not required then it is not applicable. Zoning Administrator Mabusth advised that she was not aware that adoption of Roberts Rules of Order would have to be legally adopted by an ordinance but that certainly the City Attorney would respond. Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the Planning Commission minutes of February 19, 1985. Motion, Ayes (6), Nayes (0). REPRESENTATIVE TO ATTEND COUNCIL MEETING Taylor volunteered to attend the Council meeting of April 8, 1985. ADJOURNMENT 10:42 PM Rovegno moved, Goetten seconded, to adjourn the regular Planning Commissior meeting at 10:42 p.m. Motion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). March 14, 1985 TO, Planning Commission City of Orono FROMi Jerry W. Wheeler 3399 Crystal flay Hd, Wayzata, Mo. 55391 RE, FALSE INFORMATION regarding No. 9011 Karl Johnson On Monday, March 10th., Mr, Karl_ Johnson Is scheduled to appear before you regarding TWO variance applications. I have a c"uple MAJOR concerns with the information sur- rounding this case. My first concern is that the -public notice" in this matter Indicates that Mr. Johnson has NOT been directed to apply for variances for ALL of the vio- lations that he was susposed to have filed for. My second concern is FAH MORE SERIOUS. My concern is that Staff's January 22, 1985, "Update" to the City Council on this matter is FULL of DEFINITELY FALSE INFORMATION. I would Iike to address my concern with the "public notice" first and then the January 22nd. "Update". The public notice which was in the "Laker" on March 5th., states that Mr. Johnson has applied for ONLY TkO VARIANCES (See attached), 1.) A variance to store an oversized boat 1n his (rant yard, and 2.) A variance for hardcover that he has brought it, within 75' of the lakeshore. In addition to the oversized boat and the hardcover, Mr. Johnson has also excavated the hillside and built a re- taining wall which is FULLY within the 75' lakeshore set- back (Mr. Johnson also stores a pickup truck In this same area). The retaining wall, the excavationo and the truck are ALi. VIOLATING NOT ONLY THE 75' SETBACK BUT ALSO THE 10' SIDE LOT LINE SETHA.CK HEUUINENENT. I do not fully un- derstand the variance procedure but, why hasn't Mr. Johnson been directed by Staff to ALSO apply for variances for these other violations? Mr. Johnson is violating so many of our la -es, it is inconceivable to me that he is only applying for two variances. To address ONLY these two vio- lations totally distorts the try tn. I am certain that 1 heard the City Council direct City Staff to ask Mr. Johnson to comply with ALL of these laws. There is also no reference in the public notice to the fact that the two variance applications that Mr. Johnson has flied, are "after the fact" variance applications. It is customary to have this information as part of the public notice in as much as there is a larger fee involved, fhis gentleman has recieved such "special treatment" in the past that I am simply wondering if this is an "indication" that, once again Mr. Johnson has been allowed to "slip by" where other Orono Citizens are not. (bee Attached) Now to address my second concern. Staff's January 22, 1985 !'Update" to the City Council regarding Mr. Johnson's vic lations is FULL OF DEFINITLY FALSE INFOHMATION1 I I I I a concerned that this FALSE information 1s going to be pl s anted to you, the Planning Commission, as an allegedly tic tual bade for you to Gus your decision on Sr. this matter. It 1s Imperative that you know the truth. The "Update" states that only a "am 11 portion of (Mr. Johnson's) retaining wall is located within 75' of the lake". 'This statement is TOTALLY FALSE. The truth Is that ALL OF THE RETAINING WALL IS WITHIN ZJ' OF THE LAKE SHORE. - The "Update" states that "the bank that was altered is NOT in the protected area" (emphasis added). Once again, this statement is TOTALLY FALSE. The entire excavation is within pf' of the Lakeshore.* The "Update" goes on to state that a "major portion of.... (this storage area) was the bed of a driveway that served the residence on the (rest) " This 1s literally RIDICULOUS. The "residence on the (west) side" just happens to be OURS. Not only is this Information false, Mr. Johnson himself would NEVER have allowed us to drive over "a major portion" of his property to Rain access to ours. Believe mel In addition to this false information, I have other serious concerns with this report. It is so biased in Mr. Johnson's favor as to give the appearance of DELIBERATE PLANNING. It doesn't even attempt to mention ANY fact that could possibly have a negative effect on Mr. Johnson's applications (and there are many). It is possible that Staff 1s planning to submit additional lnformatlon to you Monday evening but, In case they are not, I want you to have at least a few facts. First of all, BEFOHE Mr. Johnson built the storage area in question, he ALREADY had a blacktop parking area In front of his DOUBLE garage that measures 23'X6B','ALMOST 1,600 S1IUARE FEET OF STORAGE SPACE (See Diagram). Even though this parking pad doubles as his garage entrance, THERE I5 MORE THAN AMPLE ROOM for the storage of Mr. JOhnson'a pick up truck WITHOUT BLOCKING HIS DOUtILE GARAGE ACCESS IN ANY WAY WHAT -SO -EVER. In spite of this, Mr. Johnson stubbornly refuses to store his pickup, OR ANYTHING ELSE, on this parking pad. He insists on dumping ALL CF HIS JUNK ON OUR LOT LINE FOR US TO LOOK AT. • OIL measurements are u accurate as possible without going onto Mr. Johnson's property. The Lakeshore maul - is are based on my recollection of EKACTIY when .... .a..e- ahors was last year. I believe all measurements to be accurate within a couple of Inches. The •Update° politely states that Mr. Johnson "MeHELY.... plac(ed).... gravel over existing grassed area...." (emphasis added) ' ` there is absolutely no attempt to inform you of Just hI,. inch hardcover Mr. Johnson has. By my calculation, which may or my not be correct, Mr. Johnson has 04%. Of THE 75' SE'rBACK AREA, IN II nucomt, I wonder how many of Orono's residents are allowed to have 84% hardcoverl Last but not least, this "Update" has missed no opportunity to -shed an unusually good lights on Mr. Johnson. It goes on to "observes, in passing, that Mr. Johnson "h„s placed no plastic sheeting under the gravel"1 While this 1s indeed "a finding of fact" (and surprisingly true), HOW CAN ANY STAFF HEPORT BE SO THOROUGHLY BIASED IN ANY PERSONS FAVOR? I am ours that all of the preceding can someho•- be explain- ed away ---one item at a time. Nobody is perfe.;t. but, everything taken together paints quite a different picture, especially in light of the long term history of this dis- pute. I can't prove that Mr. Johnson has in fact continu- ally received preferential treatment from "someone" in Orono. BUT, THE EVIDENCE IS OBVIOUSLY OVERWHELMING THAT "SOMECNE" HAS DISHONEST FRIENDS IN HIGH PLACES IN ONONO. I am hoping that the Planning Commission and the City Council will see to it that such dishonesty does not un- fairly or ILLEGALLY "Influence" the outcome of this hear- ing. I would appreciate a fair hearing. (,II Slncerel/ , iD TRUCK, approximated 17'%8' IT IS VERY KVIOENT- (especially when drawn to scale) THAT MR. JOHNSON CAN EASILY PAID: HIS TRUCK ON I1I5 BLACK- TOP PAD AND STILL HAVE ROOM TO SPARE 7 CIT. ar oacse .01we IN N^.^4 Lwmnwl .A we . Pb. rrx.eti rti cow., cn,rro.�{:I it ra so�.o rrr..r w.o... nr.ra.r u.{n rs ims o, n. e �nwnxrxr rra v.�: wrr for M rpm M rvNrr urlrm W , {l u�r pmmMbp .v..l,. yx.r.. e1..1 MM 10 INI d M Ix.Jp. _ rx,pr,xM uxxv, wnu�. s o ro r arrow IMYn,G n IM lMw WILLIAM J. SIME, JR. 2106 s.uo. . aaAu . W.1.1A. MlxxfSOTA 55391 • 471.0296 March 5, 1985 Mr. Edward Callahan - Planning Commission Chairman P.O. Box 72 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Callahans Since I will be unable to attend the March 18th planning Commission meeting, Iam enclosing a copy of a change I have requested Pam to make in the February 19, 1985 P.C. minutes. I was informed by Pam that Mr. Karl Johnson of 3393 Crystal Bay Rd. will be comi before you requesting a variance to keep his 25 foot boat in his ._ont yard. This it very close to my home in an area my wife and I walk frequently. In my opinion, th 15 sit.ation is the most flagrant violation of multiple city ordinances I have seen. There are foul distinct and separate violations: 1. Dirt has been excavated from a slope within 75 feet of the lake without a permit and a retaining wall constructed. x 2. Crushed was put 1n this area which is considered by Orono to be hard cover. (Naturally, this is also within 75' of the lake) 3. A boat exceeeing 20 feet in length has been stored there; as well as a real eyesore in the form of a rusted out pick-up truck. 4. The boat, pick-up, and excavated area are all right on the property line, even though our ordinance clearly specifies a ten foot siAeyard setback -- even in the back yard. I complained to the city council in 1983 when the area was being excavated, and was ionored. Mr. wheeler of 3399 Crystal Bay Rd. --Mr. Johnson's neighbor-- has been pleading with Orono to simply have the ordinances enforced for the past two years. "h. real ir.j„etice here is that some type of oolitical pressure has been exercised to prevent the enforcement of our ordinances In Mr. Johnson's case. Even she similar "Eller matter" was disoatchea w' the comparative lightning speed of less than five months. (And t consisted of only ONE violation.) 10 grant Mr. Johnson variances to four ordinances would make a pure mockery of our codes and ordinances. As a matter of fact, I feel our city must insist that this illegal storage area be filled in and returned to its original state. Iam very sorry that I will not be able to voice my feelings personally. Sincerely, Copied to all PC members. y/•�� ( � ! n•4ri1J� t� 1 The underslrnx re,i.icnts of Crystal bay i:. r{,rec ro u, restri:t any type or also of boa,. vehicle and/or trailer within the confines of their property. A vast variety of reasons can be given to uphold this declalon, but ours :'enctes the general ^aelinf "In the. lv!st ?! years nqt one landowner has c^-.ilainec r made an insur c" their nelchlor':. storl,c policicn." NAIL 1 s.1 9.':1u O:,-AAA... JL I .�38s 17. 19. f si t +, i MINNEHAHA CREEK WATEFa";4'%D DISTRICT P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 1010 0E aMea M pava n Cochran Rev ..MOenl l lMman .laM E Tomas m.h.11 R G11011. Camille D :Mrt names 8 MCWe1hy .1aIM R SpMsiry April 2, 1985 TO: Interested Citizens Re: 1984 Annual Report fear Sir or Madam: Enclosed is a copy of th< Annual Report of Minnehahn Creek Watershed District for 1984. Should you have any questions regarding the District's activities, please feel free to ct any member of the Board of managers. Very truly yours, David M. Cochran, president Board of Managers Minnehahn Cre Water District 0439n Enc. MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT FOR 1984 March, 1905 The managers exchanged information with other governmental units affected by the programs and policies of the watershed district and honored requests to attend meetings of municipal, county and state officials as well as meetings of interested citizens and groups. The managers received substantial support and assistance from the Hennepin and Carver County Boards of Commissioners through the year which greatly assisted the district in carrying out its programs during 1984. During 1984, the managers continued to serve in organizations dealing with water resource issues. The Board participated in the activities of the Chapter 509 Section of the Minnesota Association of Watershed Districts to deal with issues in implementing Chapter 509, Laws 1982, and in the deliberations of the annual meeting of the Association, held November 30 - December 1, 1984. The managers supplied copies of minutes of all meetings and reports to interested citizens and to public officials throcghcut the district. Copies of the 15u3 Annual Report were filed in 1984 with the Minnesota Water Resources Board, the Department of Natural Resources, the Boards of County Commission^rs of Hennepin and Carver Counties and with State Senators and Representatives from the area within the watershed district. Ei, 'SION OF BOARD OF MANAGERS On November 3, 1983, the Water Resources Board conducted a hearing on the question whether to expand the size of the Board of Managers. Following hearing, the Board ordered that the Board be expanded by two managers, both to be appointed by the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County. Pursuant to that authorization, the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners appointed James R. Spensley of the City of Minneapolis and James B. ?thy of the City of Edina to the two additional manager ions. Manager Spensley took the oath of office on March 15, .4 and Manager MCWethy took the oath of office on April 19, _ 34. PERMIT APPLICATIONS The watershed district received 197 permit applications during 1984. In each instance, the proposed project was reviewed in detail for environmental soundness and for compliance with the district's rules and regulations. Applications were received for projects such as dredging, shoreline erosion protection, highway and utility crossings, setback variances, filling, preliminary plat review and drainage and grading for site development. A -2- INDEX Page Introduction...................................................1 The Managers and Meeting Information ................ ..........I Expansion of Board of Managers.................................2 Permit Applications............................................2 Hydrologic Data Collection.....................................3 Gray's Bay Control Structure/Lake Minnetonka...................3 Water Maintenance and Repair Fund ..............................4 Minnehaha Creek Channel Improvements/ Cascade Lane Area, Edina (Project CP-8)........................4 Upper Watershed Storage and Retention Project (Project CP-5)...............................4 Watershed Management Planning Chapter 509......................5 Floodplain Regulation..........................................5 Boundary Amendments............................................5 Maple Plain Treatment Plant/Interceptor ........................6 Legal/Physical Boundary Differences ............................6 Goals and Objectives...........................................6 Budget/1984....................................................7 Financial Records..............................................7 The managers exchanged information with other governmental units affected by the programs and policies of the watershed district and honored requests to attend meetings of municipal, county and state officials as well as meetings of interested citizens and groups. The managers received substantial support and assistance from the Hennepin and Carver County Boards of Commissioners through the year which greatly assisted the district in carrying out its programs during 1984. During 1964, the managers continued to serve in organizations dealing with water resource issues. The Board participated in the activities of the Chapter 509 Section of the Minnesota Association of Watershed Districts to deal with issues in implementing Chapter 509, Laws 1982, and in the deliberations of the annual meeting of the Association, held November 30 - December 1, 1984. The managers supplied copies of minutes of all meetings and reports to interested citizens and to public officials throughout the district. Copies of the 1983 Annual Report were filed in 1984 with the Minnesota Water Resources Board, the Department of Natural Resources, the Boards of County Commissioners of Hennepin and Carver Counties and with State Senators and Representatives from the area within the watershed district. EXPANSION OF BOARD OF MANAGERS On November 3, 1983, the Water Resources Board conducted a hearing on the question whether to expand the size of the Board of Managers. Following hearing, the Board ordered that the Board be expanded by two managers, both to be appointed by the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County. Pursuant to that authorization, the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners appointed James R. Spensley of the City of Minneapolis and James B. McWethy of the City of Edina to the two additional manager positions. Manager Spensley took the oath of office on March 15, 1984 and Manager McWethy took the oath of office on April 19, 1984. PERMIT APPLICATIONS The watershed district received 197 permit applications during 1984. In each instance, the proposed project was reviewed in detail for environmental soundness and for compliance with the district's rules and regulations. Applications were received for projects such as dredging, shoreline erosion protection, highway and utility crossings, setback variances, filling, preliminary plat review and drainage and grading for site development. A -2- This Annual Report of the Minnehaha Creek watershed District des a summary of the major activities of the Board of are during 1984. Any person wishing additional detail is raged to contact any individual manager. As of December 31, 1984, the names, addresses and terms of he managers are as Ia'mile follows: D. Andre 10401 Cedar Lake Rd. Term Expires Apt. 419 March 8, 1986 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Michael R. Carroll 4509 Washburn Ave. So. Term Expires Minneapolis, MN 55410 March 8, 1985 David H. Cochran 4640 Linwood Circle Term Expires Excelsior, MN 55331 March 8, 1987 Albert ". Lehman 3604 west Sunrise Drive Term Expires Minnetonka, MN 55343 March 8, 1985 James B. Mcwethy 4380 Thielen Avenue Term Expires Edina, MN 55436 March 8, 1986 James R. Spensley 5117 Chicago Avenue Term Expires Minneapolis, MN 55417 March 8, 1987 John R. Thomas 6326 Smithtown Road Term Expires Excelsior, MN 55331 March 8, 1986 The present officers are: David H. Cochran President Albert L. Lehman Vice President John E. Thomas Secretary Michael R. Carroll Treasurer During 1984, twelve regular meetings were held by the managers on the third Thursday of each month at 7:30 p.m. In order to make the meetings of the managers more accessible to all residents of the district, the managers meet in odd numbered months in the St. Louis Park City Hall and in even numbered months at the Wayzata City Hall. _I_ WATER MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FUND The Board of Managers continued its practice of requesting from the municipalities within the district suggestions for maintenance projects to be paid in part from the district's water Maintenance and Repair Fund. From the numerous requests received, the managers approved the following projects for 1984: Applicant/Location City of Mound City of Long Lake Proiect Description Shoreline erosion protection Channel improvements and sedimentation basin in drainage way tributary to Long Lake Allocation 40% of actual construction costs to a maximum of $3,000 40% of actual construction costs up to $7,500 City of Orono Culvert replacement 40% of actual at Long Lake Creek in construction costs Orono Orchard Road up to $7,000 In addition to the foregoing municipal requests, the managers authorized modification of the elevations of the canoe landings on Minnehaha CreeK located at Cray's Bay, the Horse Ford, Big Willow, and County Road 73. The costs we-e paid from the Water Maintenance and Repair Fund. MINNEHAHA CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS/CASCADE CANE AREA, EDINA (PROJECT CP-8) Channel improvements in the Cascade Lane aria of Edina were authorized by the Board on December 19, 1983, to be paid from 1983 Water Maintenance and Repair Funds. That work was not completed by the contractor during the Winter of 1984. During 1984, the contract was amended call for the contractor to complete the work during the Winter Q85. UPPER WATERSHEw STORAGE AND RETENTION PROJECT (PROJECT CP-5) Aerial photography and topographic mapping were completed in the Spring of 1984 .` , one Upper Watershed Storage and Retention Project within the Painter Creek Subwatershed (CP-5). Topographic mapping was completed and easement descriptions were prepared. On November E, 1984, the Board approved plans and specifications for -4- summary is attached to this report showing the project location and type of application received. As in previous years, a large majority of the applications received were from the Lake Minnetcnka portion of the watershed district, reflecting the continuing urbanization of that area. All permits granted by the watershed districts specifically require compliance with applicable municipal ordinances and, if the permit involved Lake Minnetonka, the applicable ordinances of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District. In add.tion, permits issued by the watershed district require compliance with any applicable rules of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The Board of Managers also took action as necessary regarding complaints, permit violations and activities which had been undertaken prior to issuance of a permit from the district. HYDROLOGIC DATA COLLECTION The district's hydrologic data collection program was continued during 1984. The data for 1983 is published in the Annual Hydrologic Data Report dated April, 1984. Copies of this report were submitted to the Minnesota Water Resources Board, the Metropolitan Council, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Department of Natural Resources, and local government officials and citizens' groups. GRAY'S BAY CONTROL STRUCTURE/LAKE MINNETONKA During 1984, the district operated the Gray's Bay Contro. Structure under the existing Management Policy and Operational Plan last revised and approved by the Department of Natural Resources on May 20, 1983. During 1984, the managers continued to rely heavily upon participation of each of the municipalities on Minnehaha Creek in recording creek elevations and flows and reporting that data to the district. The district prepared monthly summaries of this data and made these summaries available to interested municipalities and citizens. The assistance of each of the municipalities was invaluable to the district in making the operational adjustments required during 1984 to accomplish the management objectives of the Headwaters Control Structure. In connection with a request from the City of Minnetonka to use the surface of the dam and weir as part of a city trail. the district commenced an investigation of means to add public safety measures at the Dam. This study was pending at year end. -3- 1984 PERMIT APPLICATIONS A 8 C 1 D E F G H I Chanhassen 1 2 3 Deephaven 4 4 Edina 1 1 2 Excelsior 1 4 1 6 Golden Valley 0 Greenwood 1 2 3 Hopkins 1 1 2 Independence 0 Laketown Twp. 2 2 Long Lake 5 1 1 1 8 Maple Plain 1 1 Medina 2 1 3 Minnetonka 6 3 1 2 1 2 15 Minneapolis 3 3 Minnetonka Beach 7 7 Minnetriste 3 1 1 5 Mound 5 4 9 4 1 23 Orono 6 3 14 1 1 25 Plymouth 6 1 2 2 l 12 Richfield I I St. Bonifacius 0 St. Louis Park 10 1 1 12 Shorewood 6 1 5 1 13 Spring Park 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 10 Tonka Bay 3 1 7 1 12 Victoria 1 1 6 2 1 11 Wayzata 3 1 6 1 11 Woodland 3 3 Total Permit Applications 62 1 11 4 10 79 10 8 13 197 PERMIT APPLICATION CATEGORIES A - Grading and Drainage F - Shoreline cetbact Variance B - Bridge. Culvert or utilities G - Fill or excavation C - rl oodptain Development H - Other Categories 0 - Dredging I - Municipality Total E - Shoreline Improvements or Rip Rap Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, and Lower Minnesota River Watershed District to amend portions of the common boundaries of those watershed districts. A second petition was submitted in November 1984 to amend the boundaries adjacent to the Middle Mississippi Water Management Organization, Bassett Creek Flood Control Commission, Pioneer Creek Conservation Commission. and the Carver Creek Water Management Organization. A hearing was scheduled for early in 1985. MAPLE PLAIN TREATMENT PLANT/INTERCEPTOR The Board reviewed the Environmental Assessment Worksheet prepared by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency on the phase -out of the Maple Plain Treatment Plant and interceptor construction. This project will remove the last remaining sewage treatment plant which discharges into Lake Minnetonka. LEGAL/PHYSICAL BOUNDARY DIFFERENCES The managers reviewed the problems associated with review of projects located within the legal boundary of the watershed District but which drain into another watershed management organization. The managers adopted a policy to address such situations providing for th• application of the standards of the receiving organization doaver possible. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES In 1984, the managers developed policy statements on surface water management in conformance with the requirements of Chapter 509. During 1985, the managers intend to prepare a draft Watershed Management Plan for review during the latter part of 1985. The schedule calls for completior, of the plan by December 31, 1986. The managers plan to complete construction of the Upper Watershed Storage and Retention project of improvements in the Painter Creek Subwatershed (CP-5) in 1985. The 4o.vrd also intends to complete the channel improvement work in thi Cascade Lane area of Edina. The managers will continue to emphasize active use of its Water Maintenance and Repair Fund during 1985 in order to accomplish desirable maint nance projects within the district. The Boaro anticipates that i• will continue reviewing and issuing permits pertaining to indi •!.Iual site developments during 1985. -6- 1984 PERMIT APPLICATIONS A B C D E F G H 1 Chanhassen 1 2 3 Deephaven 4 4 Edina 1 1 2 Excelsior 1 4 1 6 Golden Valley C Greenwood 1 2 3 Hopkins 1 1 2 Independence 0 Laketown Twp. 2 2 Long Lake 5 1 1 1 8 Maple Plain I 1 Medina 2 1 3 Minnetonka 6 3 1 2 1 2 15 Minneapolis 3 3 Minnetonka Beach 7 7 Minnetrista 3 1 1 5 Mound 5 4 9 4 1 23 Orono 6 3 14 1 1 25 Plymouth 6 1 2 2 1 12 Richfield I 1 St. Bonifacius 0 St. Louis Park 10 1 1 12 Shorewood 6 1 5 1 13 Spring Park 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 10 Tonka Bay 3 1 7 1 12 Victoria 1 1 6 2 1 11 Wayzata 3 1 6 1 11 Woodland 3 3 Total Permit U6211 1 Applications 4 10 79 10 ? 13 197 PERMIT APPLICATION CATEGORIES A - Grading and Drainage B - Bridge, Culvert or Utilities C - Floodplain Development D - Dredging E - Shoreline Improvemerts or Rip Rap F - Shoreline - Ck Variance G - Fill or excavation tither Categories nicipality Total BUDGET/1984 As required by law, the managers, pursuant to notice, held a public hearing on September 20, 1984 on proposed budgets for the district's Administrative Fund, Water Maintenance and Repair Fund, and Watershed Management Planning Fund. Follrwing the public hearing, the managers adopted budgets for 198, for these funds. FINANCIAL RECORDS The financial records of the district are kept by a certified public accountant All financial transactions are recorded in the minutes of its meetings. The treasurer of the district maintained separate records for five funds in 1984: (1) the Administrative Fund; (2) the Water Maintenance and Repair Fund; (3) the Data Acquisition Fund; (4) Watershed Management Planning Fund, and (5) the Upper Watershed Project Fund (CP-5). Records for each of these funds include the dates and amounts of all expenditures, the names of individuals receiving payment and the purposes for which payment is made. The official depository for the district is the Wayzata State Bank, Wayzata, Minnesota. During 1984, the financial records of the district were audited for the year 1983 and a copy of the audit was filed with the State Auditor for the State of Minnesota in March 1985. Respectfully submitted, ! i>✓ 6a � David H. Cochran, Presi'�nt Board of Managers of the O 105n Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 7- PUBLIC AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT HENNEPIN Government Center .•i;,;:' Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 Li W-38" March 25, 1985 PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT Free leaf compost will be made available to the public 1, R+d-April by Hennepin County and 14 cities. ThP cc I's mpost sites will be open, beginning Saturday, April 13th, days a week from 8 a.m. to 5 p.n. A front-end loader wili be available on weeRends only during April. The Hennepin C.:unty sites are located in Eden Prairie -- :o one and a half Hiles west of Highway 169 on County Road 1, then south one -quarter mile on County Road 4: and in Maple Grove -- one mi_e west of County Road 18 on County Road 109. For more :nformatir all 935-3381. Leaf compost will be availab:e at fjur Minne_.olis street maintenance district sites, beginnini Monday, April 15th. For additions. _nformation, C.:' 348-.487. Uther cities which will operate compost distribution sites ere Bloc-ington, Brooklyn Cer.ter, Brooklyn Park, Champlin, Edin„ Excelsi� pkins, Mound, .'!ew Hope, Plymouth, Robbi,:edale, St. thony a' 4. ta. Leaf composting reeuces the need for landfi.'_ling yard wastws, while., 'n--:+dii,y garde,ers with air excellent soil •.onditioner. M107 1./.KC CC)t:`. EPI/h Tlf -- ; A G E N D A Regular Meeting, 7:30 p.m., Wednesday, March 27, 19 5--,1` TONKA PAY VILLAGE HALL 4901 Manitou Road (County Road 19), Tonka Bay f "�!._Q���� "1 il- 1. Public Hearing - Sieff 7:20 p.m. J ` 12. Call to Order '— + r-.( r/` �r %�✓I 3. Roll Call 4. Minutes - February 27, 1985 5. Treasurer's Report A. Monthly Financial Report B. Bills C. 1984 Financial Statement 6. Committee Reports A. WATER STRUCTURES 6 ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE (1) Committee Report (a) Lord Fletchers Revision (b) Public Hearing Report: M.Y.C. (c) of " to Schmitt Marina (d) to " of Surfsid^_ (e) 1985 Dock License Renewals (f) Fiture Public Hearings (g) Deicing Program Review (2) Action Item: Length Variance - Sief'. (3) 0-;ier B. LA'.E USE COMMITTEE (1) Committee Repor' (a) Special Event Permits (b) Slow Buoy 'etter (c) Special Event Stipulations (d) Charter Boat Regisrratior, (e) Commercial Licenses (f) DWI Legislation (g) Inspection Reports - Special Events (h) Water Patrol Report ( i ) Other W Action Items (a) Wayzata Fire Department Inspection/Refund (b) Wayzata Chamber of Conunerce Inspection/Refund (3) Other C. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 7. Other Business 8. Ad ournment 3-22-85 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REGULAR MEETING TONKA BAY VILLAGE HALL February 27, 1985 The regular meeting of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District CALL TO was called to order by Chairman Brown at 7:30 p.m. on Wednesday, ORDER February 27, 1985 at the Tonka Bay Village Hall. Members present: Carl Weisser* (Excelsior), Robert Brown (Green- ATTENDANCE wood), Robert Pillsbury (Minnetonka), Donald Boynton (Minnetonka Beach), Jon Elam (Mound), JoEllen Hurr (Orono), Robert Rascop (Shorewood), Ron Kraemer (Spring Park), and Robert Slocum (Wood- land). Communities represented: Nine 191. *Arrived late. Hurr Moved, Rascop Seconded that the minutes of the January 23, MINUTES 1985 meeting be approved. Motion, Ayes 181, Nays 101. Hurr Moved, Pillsbury Seconded that the Treasurer's Report be TREASURBR'O approved and the bills paid. Motion, ayes 18), Nays 10). REPORT WATER STRUCTURES 6 ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE: Rascop reported that the committee laid -over the Fletcher matter, in the absence of the applicant. The committee reviewed 1985 dock license renewals, modified stipulations, and made recommendations; future public hearings were also reviewed. Permanent dock status in relation to deicing permits was reviewed, two deicing permits were recommended for approval, and the deicing program was reviewed in relation to new uses for needing deicing equipment: (1) protection of Lake -stored boats, (2) protection DEICING of dockage which had usually been removed other years, (3) protec- PROGRAM tion of boat lifts left in the water, (4) use of over -sized or directional pumps, (5) chronic deicing without a permit, or (6) other purposes. Other questions arising were. (a) should deicing be allowed after March 1 without a permit this season? (b) should deicing be permitted only after March 1? (c) difficulty of enforce- ment, primarily due to unavailability of responsible party? (d) authority to turn off or remove pumps that are forming hazardous crperations? and (e) any need for public hearing? The committee: recommender+ that the Boyce-Aruott variance order be enforced, was update,j on t`,t Upper Watershed Project CP-5, was advised that a permanent dock permit was issued to Sieff upon the understanding that a deicing permit would not be granted, was updated on the Causeway tatter, and was advised of the Winston development project in Tonka Bay. LMCD Board Minutes February 27, 1985 Page 2 Elam Moved, Hurt Seconded that the committee report be accepted. Motion, Ayes [9], Nays [0). Elam Moved, Hurt Seconded that the following 1985 renewal dock license applications be approved, subject to village response: City of Deephaven Eagle Bluff City of Excelsior City of Greenwood Lafayette Club Lafayette Ridge Homeowners Association Lakewinds Condominium Association City of Mound Park Hill Apartments Park Island Apartments .ir , Island .:est Apartments Motion, Ayes 191, Nays [0]. 1985 DOCK LICENSES Hurt Moved, Pills!- ry Seconded that the deicing permit applicatio^s DEICING for Wayne Burkhalter and James Kuntuzos be approved, subject to PERMITS inspection and notice to abutting neighbors. Motion, Ayes 191, Nays (0). Hurr Moved, Elam Seconded that the Boyce-Arnott variance Order BOYCE be enforced. Motion, Ayes ]9], Nays ]0). ORDER LAKE USE COMMITTEE: Pillsbury reported that the committee: reviewed the public hearing report on ultralights; held review of Special Event stipulations; continued discussion of liquor sales on the Lake; recommended refund of the Birchview deposit; continued discus- sion on boat size; deferred further discussion and action on DWI matters until outcome of proposed legislation is kr.owii; will further develop the question of commercial licenses on the Lake; recommended the District's cooperation with Greenwood in pending DWI prosecu- tions; accepted a letter from a hockey group proposing a marathon race on the Lake next winter; and was advised of the status of the fish house letter program for cleanup. The Water Patrol reported to the committee 0at. the number of fish houses is down this year, and Patrol act.�ity is also down, all possibly because fishing was not very good this winter. The WATER Water Patrol inspected the Chilly Open: cleanup was satisfactory PATROL except at Excelsior around the ball fields - cooperation nad been REPORT promised in seeing that the area would be cleaned up; there were no first aid kits or trash containers at that location. The Water Patrol reported to the Board that the bNR inspected fish houses, LMCD Board Minutes February 27, 1985 Page 3 found about 50 still left on the Lake; the game warden reported heavy debris but that people are cleaning up. Boynton Moved, Hurr Seconded that the committee report be accepted. Motion, Ayes (9), Nays (0). Pillsbury Moved, Rascop Seconded that the Birchview deposit be BIRCHVIEW refunded. Motion, Ayes (9), Nays :01. REFUND Hurr reported on the Minnesota House hearing regarding DWI matters; she encouraged support of DWI legislation that can be enforced in boat operation. The Water Patrol supported her report by indica- ting that, while the original Bill was strong, the final Bill may not be. Hurr Moved, Rascop Seconded that by letter the District support DWI the original legislation regarding DWI matters on the Lake. Motion, LEGISLATION Ayes (9), Nays (0). EXECUTIVE COKIITTEE: Brown reported that the committee reviewed the Boyce orjer and recommended proceeding to bring the dockage into conformance with the variance Order of 1-25-84. Greenwood's DWI prosecution letter was reviewed, as well as the status of liquor licensing on the Lake. The committee reviewed a proposal from the county court to provide the LMCD with summary data relating to the Water patrol citations issued on the Lake for 1984. The committee concurred that the data provided should include the following breakdowns: city, type of violation, fine, county costs, other costs assessed to the city, activity for 1984, and the number of guilty pleas vs. those needing prosecution. After review of deicing violations on the Lake, the corunittee determined that deicing prosecutions should proceed o,. hazarJous installations, with or without notice to the violator. The 1984 final budget report was reviewed and the summary memo; AUDIT bids fur auditor will be let. The committee reviewed the proposed change in ownership of docks presently owned by Minnetonka Moorings, Inc. which are leased to Shorewood Yacht Club, Inc. Upon legal opinion that change in ownership does not constitute a change in use under LMCD Code, the committee recommended that a license amendment application changing ownership to the Snug Harbor Yacht Club, Inc. be approved as a minor change. LMCD Board Minutes February 27, 1985 Page 4 In other matters the committee: discussed the value of holding a planning conference for Directors to review present policy and PCA: fUtL-re direction of the Board; snd determined to continue to monitor ACID PCA information as its program develops on acid disposition. DISPOSAL Pillsbury Moved, Hurr Seconded that the committee report be accepted. Motion, Ayes 191, Nays (0). Rascop Moved, Pillsbury Seconded to reconfirm LMCD policy that DWI local prosecuting attorneys have authority to prosecute matters PROSECUTION on the Lake, including DWIs. Motion, Ayes (9), Nays (0). Elam Moved, Boynton Seconded, regarding liquor sales on the Lske, LIQUOR that '.he LMCD seek to convince the Comm;ssioner of Public Safety, SALES on an infor•Aal basis, to implement procedures which would afford some greater degree of protection to the Lake. Motion, Ayes 191, Nays )0). Hurr Moved, Elam Seconded that prosecutions of deicing violators DEICING should be pursued as promptly as possible, to eliminate reicing VIOLATIONS hazarJs. Motion, Ayes f9j, Nays [0). Pillsbury Moved, Hurr Seconded that the license amendment applica- SHOREWOOD tion changing ownership from Minnetonka Moorings, Inc./Shorewood Y.C. NAME Yacht Club, Ins. to Snug Harbor Yacht Club, Inc. be approved with CHANGE no change in use. Motion, Ayes (9), Nays (0). Elam Moved, Rascop Seconded that a planning/work session to review PLANNING/ dock policies and other matters be held, with Bauman, Gisvold N01Y and Elam to prepare the format. Motion, Ayes 191, Nays 10). SESSIONS OTHER BUSINESS: Regarding authority to shot -Sown or rtmove deicing, equipment when it creates a hazardous condition, the Water Patrol reported they have received direction to unplug any such un-t, to eliminate the hazardous condition. ADJOURNMENT: Brown Moved, Rascop Seconded at 9 p.m. that the ADJOURNED meeting be adjourned. Motion, Ayes (9), Nays 10). Submitted by: JoEilen L. Hurr, Secretary Approved by: Robert Tipton Brown, Chairman M E T R O P O L I T A N C 0 U N C I L Suite 30U Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 METRO HRA ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, April 10, 1985 9:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. HRA Conference Room (Lower Level ?5) A G E N D A I. Approval of present agenda and Minutes of February 13 and March 13, 1985 Committee meetings. II. Health Vote Presentation - III. Progress report on the Metropolitan Housing Fund and the Grants Proposal IV. Recommendation for approval of revised program objectives and guidelines for the Metropolitan Housing Fund Phil Cohen, Chair 1am26la APR .r � Y O .ORON� Julie Opitz Roberta Everling Robe"ta Everling (action item) METROPOLITAN COUNCIL HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHCRITY Suite 300 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 Minutes of HRA ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING March 13, 19p5 Members Present: Philip Cohen, (Chair), Edmund Bowler, Sharon Garber Marilyn Spensley, Josey Warren, Gertrude Ulrich Members Absent: Joan Archer, Lyn Burton, Thomas Duffy Staff: Laurie Garfield, David Wilson, Mary Fromm, Nancy Reeves Dianne Stone, Kathleen Mulligan, I. Approval of Agenda The meeting agenda was approved, with the addition of one agenda item: Discussion of future HRA Advisory Committee meeting agendas. II. Application for FY 1985 Section 8 Rental Assistance for section 8 Certificates/Vouchers - Laurie Garfield Garfield explained that HUD has made funding available for 360 additional Section 8 households. At this time we have no idea how many we may receive, though we a^e recommending applying for 250 certificates. The request breakdown is as follows: 75 1-bedroom; 100 2-bedroom, and 75 3-bedroom units. Spensley asked if we were addressing the need of the community by requesting the certificates in the quantities we proposef. Garfield assured her we were. Garfield elaborated on her 3/5/85 memo, explaining we last took applications for 3-bedroom units in 1983; (by the end of May it is anticipated that all of the 1983 applicants will receive a certificate and applications will again be taken once a month, starting in June); 2-bedroom certificate applications are taken once a month; and 1-bedroom certificate applications will again be taken in approximately 18 months. Garfield then explained the breakdown of the prQsent waiting list by unit size. David Wilson spoke briefly on the reasons applicants drop from the list. Ulrich expressed concern about the availability vs aff-rdability issue. Bowler/Cohen suggested incentives be offered to buyers to attract those who will rent to households in need of a3313tance. Garfield presented the recommendation as follows: RECOMMENDATION: That the Executive Director be authorized to subs` an application to HUD for 250 Section 8 certifictes. Moved by Sharon Garber, seconded by Josey Warren to apji ove the recommendation. Motion carries unanimously. III. Future Agenda Items The following list of ajenda items was .ugg-sted by committee members for future meetings: 1. Speakers relating studies and/or statistics on housing vs airports in small communities. 2. Accommodating different lifestyles, i.e., day care facilities, communal living, etc. Is there anything we can do as an agency to help out. 3. As population reduces and more housing becomes available, will there be a reduction in the value of existing housing; how will our programs be affected. 4. Representative from state demographers office - the future in housing. 5. Home buying for $1 - is this available in rehab programs in all communities - HUD representatives. 6. Housing for the elderly in rural areas. 7. Housing for the handicapped. Meeting adjourned. km249a METROPOLITAN COUNCIL HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Suite 300 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 Minutes of HRA ADVISOPY COMMITTEE MEETING February 13, 1985 Members Present: Philip Cohen, Joan Archer, Edmund Bowler Lyn Burton, Thomas Duffy, Sharon Garber, Marilyn Spensley, Gertrude Ulrich Members AP �-nt: Wanda Schumacher, Josey Warren Staff: Dianne Stone, Jan Hogan, Laurie Garfield, Kathleen Mulligan, Nancy Reeves, David Wilson Also Present: Peter Bachman, Dolores Hastings Approval of Agenda and Minutes The agenda was approved as well as the minutes from the January 9, 1985 committee meeting. Revised Grievance Procedure - Daivid Wilson: Wilson said in March 1984 HUD published a new set of regulations to govern hearings. Until that time, Metro HRA had been operating with procedures that had evolved over time without direction from HUD. The changes addressed at this meeting are a response to the March 1984 HUD regulations which specify that -- informal grievance hearings be made available only to program participants. Appeals ma e� by program applicants to fA decisions affecting their status, are to be handled by a separate informal review procedure. (If we heard grievances from applicants, it would defeat the economy of the system.) The procedures had several problems: The informal hearing procedure is rather costly, there is no compelling reason to have legal staff on the panel, and it is difficult to guarantee impartiality if panel members are close to the day-to- day activites of the program. The formal hearing:+ are difficult to schedule with an outside panel, there has never been a regulation requirement for the PHA to provide formal appeals, and only a small ncrcentage of grievances have been referred to the formal level. It is felt the new procedures will ensure inaart_ �lity and speed up the process. BURTON asked for a synopsis of a typica� grievance. WILSON said most grievances have to do with claims paid to owners, and anything to do with eligibility is a grievance. There are about 5 hearings/month. GARBER - Since the new procedure has only one officer, what kind of controls wi 1 1 there be? WILSON ex'iained there will be a rotation; Metro Council housing planners have been prufr�id as participants. Training will be provided by Peter Bachman, Metro Council Assistant Counsel, and David W113on. The procedure is: Grievant requests herring, Metro HRA schedules the hearing, defines the :sue and the case is then heard by a wing officer. The officer would receive regulations, review the and make a dicision. The grievant may dispute the decision. (Wilson et`;�.J31zed the impartiality of the proposed hearing procedure.) COHEN - Is this a fairness and equity issue? Should the officer have leaal training? BACHMAN responded that housing planners would be acceptable. If grievant objects to a particular officer, that person would be removed and another officer could be brought in or the hearing rescheduled. Eligible hearing officers would include housing planners, Phil Katzung, Metro HRA program manager. David Wilson, Laurie Garfield, Dianne Stone; whoever is available. GARBER - Asked to ha•e sexist terms taken out of the amendments and WILSON agreed. KATZUNG - We have a three -person hearing panel now; this ran be intimidating. With one officer it would be less intimidating. WILSON emphasized the impartiality of the proposed hearing procedure. COHEN - Does legal counsel sit in on all procedures? Is a transcript made? BACHMAN - If requested. WILSON - A member of the panel writes up a summary. GARBER - Should there be a tape recorder on? WILSON - This could be considered. BACHMAN - If grievant requests tape recorder; ok. But there are so few it is not practical. WILSON - Recommended approval of the new procedures to the Metro HRA as follows: RECOMMENDATION: That the Metro HRA Advisory Committee recommend that the Metropolitan and Community Development Committee approve the proposed amendments to he Metro HRA Policies Governing Admission to Section & Rent Assistance Program and Grievance Procedures. MOVED BY GARBER, SECONDED B! SPENSLEY TO APPROVE THE RE COKiENDATION (Garber and Spensley agreed to amend the motion to remove sexist terms.) Motion carried, unanimously, COHEN asked Committee members ,,., Le prepares -.a supgea* r:arure agenda items at the next. meeting. Meeting adjourne,: at 9:4'. a.m. km204a ' T GIT �,►. {(IN April 1, 1985 TO ALL DIRECTORS AND ALTERNATE DIRECTORS OF THE SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY SRA Quarterly Meeting April 17, 1985 6:30 P.M. Ambassador Motor Hotel PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the regular quarterly :eting of the Suburban Rate Authority will be hold at the Ambassador Motor Hotel, 5225 Wayzata Boulevard, Highway #12 & i100, St. Louis Park-, on Wednesday, April 17, 1985, commencing at 6:30 P.M. This will be the usual dinner mcetin,. Please indicate your intentions as to attendance by returning the enclosed postcard promptly to Mr. LeFevere's office. A tentative agenda is enclosed. J. N. DALEN, Secretary - Treasurer Enclosures (1) Postcard to directors and alternates (2) Agenda to directors, alternates and municipal clerks TENTATIVE AGENDA SItA QUARTERLY MEETING April 17, 1985 A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Approval of Minutes D. Reports of Officers E. Claims F. Consideration of Communications G. Unfinished Business - Review of MWCC Management Study Progress - Report as to Uniform Electric Franchise Report on CSO Legislation H. New Business I. Adjournment EXPRESS NOTES APRIL 1985 j.'ORDINA.TED TRANSPORIAPON 36U Bryant Av 5 Minneapolis, MN 55409 827-1721 West Metro Coordinated Transportation wishes to say thank you to the many Hennepin County volunteers who dedicate their services in trans- portation programs. Drivers, escorts, dispatchers and other trans- portation volunteers are invited to attend a recognition event on Tuesday, April 23, 1985 from 2:00 - 4:00 p.m. at St. Louis Park Recreation Center, 5005 West 36th Street, St. Louis Park. The festivities will include a presentation by Leonz Schooley, Manager of Traffic Safety Services (retired), Minnesota Safety Council, the awarding of door prizes, and an opportunity to meet and share experi- ences with other volunteers. To register, contact Kathy Farris, 827-1721, or the organization you volunteer with. West Metro Coordinated Transportation will sponsor a Defensive Driving course on May 15 and 16, 1985, 12:30 - 4:30 p.m., at Lenox Community Center, 5912 Minnetonka Blvd., St. Louis Park. The course is open to drivers of social service transportation programs which provide rides to Hennepin County senior citizens. The class will be taught by an instructor from the Minnesota Safety Council. Course content includes: 1) preventab-lity of motor vehicle crashes, 2) situ- ations of the two -car crash, 3) standard accident prvention formula, 4) run -off -the -road crashes, 5) preventing pedestrian and bicycle accidents, and 6) freeway driving. Individuals who successfully com- plete the course will receive a certificate. Cost for the entire eight -hour session is $5. Contact Kathy Farris at 827-1721 to obtain registration materials. The West Metro Coordinated Transportation T.a-isciy Council has awarded _ o Crystal, s to 1, $2,000 to the five cities of Brook�fyn—^enter, y Goldin Valley, New Hope and Robbinsdale to provide rides to senior residents of this area. These five cities are forming a joint powers agreement to pro- vide needee transportation to recreational and social programs, con- gregate dining sites, shopping centers and special events. The ser- vice is scheduled to begin this month. Interchurch Community Association has been awarded $50 from West Metro Co! ordinate) Transportation to prov. a assenger Assistance training for their volunteer drivers. The training will also be open to drivers of People Reaching Out to Other People (PROP). The Volunteer Training Fund was established to assist organisations in providing quality training to their volunteers in transportation programs. (OVER) TRANSPORTATION SPOTLIGHT - Senior Ride 1,i(,(jram/North Memorial Medical Center "Senior Ride" is a program operated by North Memorial Medical Center to provide rides for seniors residing in the northwest suburbs of Hennepin County and north Minneapolis. Senior Ride began service it. Octob?r 1982 and is funded through West Metro Coordinated Trans- portation with Title III funds of the Older Americans Act. Using either a lift -equipped or regular van, ransportation is provided for medical -related trips only. Senior Ride Program drivers pick uo riders at their homes and will transport them to any location within hennepin County. Thu eligibility requirements to ride are: -age 60 or over -resident of northwest suburbs or north Minneapolis -self-supported, independent livi:.g arrangement (includes highrise apartments and single-family homes) -must not be under 24-hour nursing care or in need of medical assist-_rce during transit Service is available from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. To arrange a ride, call 520-5025 the Friday before for any ride needed the following week. Rides are scheduled in a first come, first serve basis. Service is free, however donations are welcome. For more information on the Senior Ride Program, cc *act Keith Hoof, North Memorial. Medical Center, 3300 Oakdale Avenue North, Robbinsdale, 520-5859. West Metro Coordinated Transportation, a ..rogram of Senior Citizen Centers of Greater Minneapolis, Inc., is made possible in part under the FEDERAL OLDER AMERICANS ACT through a grant from the METROPOLITAN COUNCIL under an area plan approved by the MINNESOTA BOARD ON AGING. ------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------- West Metro Coordinated Transportation Senior Citizen Centers of Greater Minneapolis Pam ►woriT OOM. 3614 Bryant Avenue South � U.S. POSTAGE Minneapolis, MN 55409 _7 . PAID D w�rw.u. wry PwrmN Na 2" OF 0;1vio ' Sir W y°r f Or °n0 Cgo1 66 Say S�g23 Cr ysta� 9 4 IL 9 Iva < 9 It go. 00 j lot pi PROPOSED SITE PLAN scule 1'- 20' IT ®R n-2 M CITY Of ORONO 414. �� - — -- i.IM CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR M {> CRa.9ta MkRINU OF ILI6 MINNEMNEA in Government Lot 1, Section 8-117-23 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of all of Lot 6 and the Fast 50 feet of Lot 7, Lydlard's Ark, and that part of Government lot 1, Section 8, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, des- cribed as follows: Commencing at a point 724 feet on a bearing of West from a point on the Fast line Of said Government Lot 1 distant 675.91 fset South of meander corner No. 57 on the South shore of Maxwell Day, Lake Minnetonka, said Past line being assumed to have a bearing of North for purposes of this descrip- tion; thence North 2008- East a dis- tance of 198.4 feet; thence South Sr52' Fast a distance of 70 feet to the point of beginning of the property being described; thence North 20081 East to the shore of Maxwell lay; thence Southwesterly along said shore to ■ line drawn parallel with and 856 Cost at right angles West of the East line of said Government Lot 11 thence South parallel with said East line W to the Northerly line of County Road No. 51; thence Southeasterly along said Northerly line to a line drawn South 2008' West from the point of beginning; thence North 2008' East to the point of beginning, and of the location of all build- ings thereon. It does not pur- port to show other improvements or encroachments. Gordon R. Coffin log. No. 6064 land Surveyor and Planner Long Lake, Minnesota Scale- le = 50, Date t 1-20-83 o 1 Iron marker too / , Ap" l S /17S�__ Ity CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR NORTH STAR MARINA, INC. in Government lot 1, Section 8-117-23 �atc I hereby certify that this Is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of all of lot 6 and the Zeat 50 feet of Lot 7, Leydiard's Park, and that part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, describsd as followsi Cosnancing at a point 721 feet cn a bearing of West 1 from a point on the Zest line of said Government Lot 1 distant 675.91 feet South of wander corner No. 57 on the South shore of Maxwell Ray, lake Minns- tonka, said Zest live being assumed to have ■ bearing of North for purposes of this description; thence North 20000 Zest a distance of 198.4 feet; thence South 87052' Zeat a distance of 70 feet to the point of beginning of the property being described; thence North 2008' Zest to the shore of Maxwell Bay; thence Southwesterly along said shore to a line drawn parallel with and 858 feet at right angles West of the grit line of sail Governmant lot 1; thence South parallel with said Fast line to the Northerly 11ns of County Road No. 51; thence Southeasterly along said Northerly line to ■ line drawn South 20081 West from the point of beginning; thence North 2008e Past to the point of N beginning, And of the location of all buildings thereon. It does not purport to show other Improvements or encroach - Monte. Gordon R. Coffin Reg. No. 6064 Land Surveyor and Planner Long lake, Minnesota .C11 Scale: le = 50, Date 4-10-81 o Iron marker Apr; g 9 4 1 F/ ko M,RRcfa^ may—., tqa F..f I' nil I I� U iirl I