HomeMy WebLinkAbout1970-09-15 Finding of Planning Commr
For—OEY'lcial Use Only
Village of Orono Name
Zoning Variance
!!—
e No.
Findings and Recommendations
of
Planning Commission and Village Council
�40 Qp ,hP C4-
ame o ner Last Firs
Address of Owner No. and Street City and Zip (Phone)
Address f Property No. and Street Citv and Z
1. Present Use:
Description and used sur
. rropos
Jse :
property:
4.s is to property by members of Commission:
Date Members Purpose of Visit
5. Oral or written reports submitted to Planning Commission and
by whom prepared. (Include in file a copy of report when
possible.)
a0'" D - -/ k7 -it e- C, //J1 1
4-.0
6. Appearances by applicant or his representatives before
Planning Commission regarding this matter:
Date Persons Appearing
9 V-70 G'on fiu� fa r - 2-be,-
Testimony and Exhibits
Presented
rJ`ee tc6, v ��7ro bo sY
home -
Difficulties or hardship to owner. See question 14 of
application.)
Cor-M Or
Qalnor1�
u n K 64 ble 7h) arm
Ct66e5s 7-1(eof5 ca�h5�"
is -A-idable
�oo Oda Ata b/e -fe �e
5 f', t/ 03 9 f o ,; !�b e Gr o� i
fh ci' ,0 c r f y, 7tiy�e S
/ q70 /
8. Conditions of the property. See question 15 of application.)
a. Size and shape of lot.
42iY2 ra y 5 be �7 7G r%e e
Al4t 00 O n IJI:6feroeS5
b. Buildings.
c. Roadways and driveways.
d. Natural topography. r
J-6 / O i e � 6 e u f — A'- a 6 e ✓'e /a klo le sc l
J66 1`O / S 3k/A m p vj �e r' /-/SF m e 5'A
e. Special or unusual conditions.
9. Effect on neighborhood and comprehensive plan. See question
16 of application.)
a. Effect of proposed use on surrounding property
(light and air, noise, drainage, property value).
6) afAl a r- th , () /- 5 4.� /) , c V O m F O r/i e,
`UDald Pnha ACC- 'fbF ne1gj,behee� G
b. Description of traffic conditions in vicinity and effect
of proposed use on them.
/VO
c. Dangers to public safety (fire, health, pollution).
N,e rl
d. Compatibility of proposed use any applicable compre-
hensive plan of Village.
e. Reactions, if any, of abutting property owners to
proposed variance.
10. Other comments.
11. Planning Commission Recommendations.
P-1 Variance should be granted.
Variance should be denied
Variance should be granted with following conditions:
2. Village Council Action
a. Findings (if different than above)
b. Disposition
Variance granted
Variance denied
Variance granted with following conditions:
TO: Administrator
FROM: Inspector
DATE: September 15, 1970
SUBJECT: Lot Size and Setback Variance - Jerry Stageberg - 1920 Fagerness
Point Road
Jerry Stageberg has made application for a variance on lot size and
front setback for the purpose of constructing a residence at 1920
Fagerness Point Road, Parcels 5610 & 5620, 7. F.e�eY-ness
Mrs. Ron Peterson, former owner, made application for same last year
and was denied in December, 1969. Since the six months are up, a
variance can be legally applied for again. Conditions are the same as
last year. The property is serviced by sewer.
Remarket Parcel 5610 is 109000 sq. ft. parcel 5620 is 179500
sq. ft.9 however much of parcel 5620 is swamp.
Parcel 5610 is only 2* ft. above water level.
There is a real problem in having enough buildable
land. Possibly the planning commission did not
make a full study of this lot. Before approval,
we need to know how much fill is to be doneq
and how much is buildable now.
Ralph H. Martin 9/24/70