Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-25-1985 Council PacketMINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 25, 1985. PAGE ATTENDANCE 7:00 PM The Orono Council met on the above date with the following members present: Acting Mayor Frahm, Council - members Lynn Adams and Jim Grabek. Councilmember Tim Adams and Mayor Butler were absent. The following represented the City staff: Building 6 Zoning Adminis- trator Mabusth, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson, Deputy Clerk Lattin, and Recorder Sutton. Police Chief Kilbo arrived at 7:11 p.m. and Finance Director Kuehn arrived at 8:05 p.m. City Attorney Radio was also present. City Engineer Cook was absent. CONSENT AGENDA* Acting Mayoi Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded► to approve the Consent Agenda*, with all staff reports concerning these items to be attached to an original copy of these minutes on file in the City Clerk's office. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). APPROVAL OF MINUTES* LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT Acting Mayor seconded, to meeting held (0). Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams approve the minutes of the regular Council February 11, 1985. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays Jo Ellen Hurr was present. Hurr discussed with the Council the LMCD's decision on Chaska Marina. Hurr noted that the Supreme Court's directives of 1981 for Chaska Marina is what the LMCD is abiding by. Hurr stated that Chaska Marina turned their docks a different way. Hurr noted that Chaska Marina is not responding to the LMCD's demands regarding the setbacks on the west side. Acting Mayor Frahm asked Hurr to check into the matter as to why Chaska Marina is not responding. Hurr noted that the LMCD is still working on the DWI bill for boaters on the lake. Hurr noted that last year 20 speeding tickets were issued on the lake. Hurr noted that the LMCD will be purchasing a new DWI detector breathalyser which will be located at the Water Patrol station and the offender will be driven back to the Water Patrol to take the test. Acting Mayor Frahm suggeEted that the LMCD investigate into this further because of the burden of escorting someone all the way back to the Water Patrol station. Frahm noted that the portable breathalyzer that the LMCD is currently using is better than their new proposal. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 25, 1985. PAGE Hurr noted that she did speak to the concerned Mound resident about the density of the development on Pelican Point and explained that the LMCD has no jurisdiction over the land. Hurr stated that the proposal for Pelican Point is on a 16 acre parcel with 96 proposed units. Hurr did nc,te that the LMCD standards would apply to the dockage proposed in the development. Hurr stated that the LMCD has not received an application from the developers yet. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Councilmember L. Adams noted that he attended the Planning Commission meeting of February 19, 1985, and that the Commission asked him to set up a joint meeting with the Council. Council discussed various dates and decided that the joint meeting will be held March 25, 1985, from 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. and then at 7:00 p.m. the regular Council. meeting will commence. Council gave staff an alternate date of Saturday, March 23, 1985, if the March 25th date will not accommodate everyone. Councilmember L. Adams stated that a motion was made at the last Planning Commission meeting to have Gloria McDonald removed from the Commission and the Commission was concerned with her excessive absenteeism. Adams noted that the motion died for lack of a second. Adams stated that. the Planning Commission was opposed to the Council's two-year term rule limiting Planning Commis- sion member's terms and asked that Council address this new rul.e. Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to have staff schedule a joint meeting between the Council and Planning Commission for March 25, 1985 from 6-7 p.m. and an alternate date of Saturday, March 2.31 1985, if the previous date won't accommodate everyone. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). PUBLIC COMMENTS Herman Renner of 3180 North Shore Drive was present to point out the problf—is he and surrounding neighbors are having with North Shore Drive Marina. Renner noted that the director of the LMCD, Frank Mixa, will not respond to his complaints. Renner stated that the dockage at North Shore Drive Marina is the problem connecting with the docks of the residents. Renner also noted that the dei7ing pump is so strong that it creates a wake and it has deiced beyond the fence line to the residents surrounding North Shore Drive Marina. Renner noted that the pump is destroying the fishing around the area and also ice skating for the residents. Renner asked who approved the permanent docking for North Shore Drive Marina. Renner stated that the docks should not allow to intersect with residential docks. MINUTES OF THE: REGULAR CRONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 25, 1985. PAGF: 3 Zoning Administrator Mabus•t. toted that North Shore Drive Marina was not subjected to the current zoning because of the court case whi.�h allowed North Shore Drive Marina to go by the old zoning code. Jo Ellen Hurr noted that the LMCD did send an inspector out to the site and that. inspector noted that the dockage conforms to the LMCD requirements. fiurr noted that another inspector from the LMCD will be sent out to investigate into the deicing pumper to see if it meets the requirements since the pumper isn't suppose to cause a wake. Hurr noted that the LMCD is no longer allowing permanent docks. Hurr noted that Orono has approved extensive permanent docking for North Shore Drive Marina. Herman Renner stated that the City should allow the residents in this area to shift their docks around or the City will be involved in a lawsuit. Renner noted that the docking cannot follow the lot lines in tnis neighborhood. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENTS Howard Johnson of 1635 Concordia Street asked Council for more direction regarding his proposal on Concordia Street. Johnson noted that he has dealt with the hardcover issue by proposing holding ponds that will hold a 6" rain. Johnson noted he is proposing five docks in a cluster. Johnson stated that Oreno's code states that. the City likes PUD's because it doesn't destroy the natural amenities. Johnson n;.ted that his proposal is with one car garages in hopes to attract the quiet person. Johnson stated that in the future he hopes to put a tennis court on the property. Acting Mayor Frahm informed Johnson that the property in question will only allow two riparian lots and no multiple docks. Frahm stated that the City has never allowed attached dwellings near the lake except those neighborhoods that were next to a commercial area. Councilmember L. Adams felt that Johnson has a good proposal and an innovative way to use his four and a half acres. Adams noted he would be in favor- of five lots with two of those five being riparian rights. Adams stated t;iat Johnson would have to assign those riparian rights to only two of the lots. Adams felt that Johnson had compromised a great deal from his first proposal. Councilmember Gra!Dek asked Johnson if this is what he would like to sce happen to the lake. Grabek felt that Johnson was not following the intent of the zoning code. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL, MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 25, 1 98', _ PAGE 4 #853 DOUGLAS KLINT TOM BERNI ER 6 GARY BARR 3535/3545 IVY PLACE i 3034 CASCO POINT RD SUBDIVISION There was no one present to represent the applicants. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that this application is a result of the vacation of Maple Avenue. Councilmember L. Adams moved, Acting Mayor Frahm seconded, to approve the plat of a lot line rearrangement known as Casco Cove finding all lots meet the standards of the LR-lC zoning district and that all. existing structures meet the required setbacks for the district, with approval subject to the condition that the plat be amended to reflect the City's ownership of that portion of Ivy Lane referred to on the preliminary plat as "to be dedicated as road". Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). #872 BRECKENRIDGE DEVELOPMENT CORP 1200 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD FINAL. SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #1729* Acting Mayor Frahm seconded, to adopt Approving the Plat Nays (0). moved, Councilmember L. Adams Resolution #1729, A Resolution of BRECKENRIDGE. Motion, Ayes (3), #880 STEVEN RUCE 4625 WEST BRANCH ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR REFUND OF APPLICATION FEE Steven Ruce was present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that at the last Council meeting, Steven Ruce's application was placed on Consent Agenda* and was approved but the request for the refund of the application fee was never addressed. Steven Ruce noted that since his application has such a minimal "commercial" use with no retail sales activity on the property, he asked Council for a refund of the conditional use permit fee of $100. Ruce noted that this was also the Planning Commission's recommendation. Acting Mayor Frahm noted that the conditional use permit is protection for the City in order for the City to control the level of commercial use on the property. Frahm noted that a 10 x 25' greenhouse could very easily become a more intense commercial greenhouse with a future owner. City Attorney Radio stated that the fee is to pay for staff time spent in reviewing the application and also for the filing of the resolution in the chain of title. MINUTES OF T11E REGULAR ORONO COUNCII. MEETING 11EI.D FEBRUARY 25, 1985. PAGE 5 #880 STEVEN RUCE Councilmember L. Adams agreed with Ruce and the Planning Commission in regards to the low level of commercial use for the property. Adams stated that Ruce could have come into the City hall and asked for a building permit and received a building permit without getting a conditional use, but he was honest and mentioned a low level of commercial use for the property. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that the zoning code doesn't address the "deqree" of commerciality. Mabusth explained that to be asked for a refund of the fee is rather after -the -fact. Councilmember Grabek moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to refund the $100 conditional use application fee t Steven Ruce but still have the conditional use on file and filed in the chain of title in order to protect the City against further commerciality on the property based on the low level of commercial use intended for the property. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). #886 RICHARD RAGATZ 1945 CONCORDIA STREET %ARIANCE RESOLUTION #1730* Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to adopt Resolution #1730, A Resolution Granting a Variance to permit construction of a 770 sf deck structure of which 404 sf is to be located within the 0-75' setback zone. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). PLANNING FOR MAINTENANCE OF !MUNICIPAL CODE Zoning Administrator Mabusth recommended that the City contract with the Municipal Ordinance Codifiers, Inc. for one year who would provide for the first annual revision and update of the municipal code. Mabusth stated that the other option is to buy the discs and have the City's own clerical staff update the code. Mabusth noted that the Municipal Codifiers would be able to incorporate the State Statutes into the municipal code whereas the City clerical staff would not be able to without a great deal of time spent on the project. Mabusth noted that the City already has adopted 10 ordinances since the recodification of the code. Councilmember Grabek asked if the Codifiers could give the City an evaluation throughout the year to get some idea of the cost of such a service. Police Chief Kilbo noted that the three of those ten ordinances were the ones the Codifiers left out in the first place. Kilbo noted that those first three ordinances that were left out should be free ones from the Codifiers. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 25, 1985. PAGE 6 Councilmember L. Adams suggested purchasing the discs from the Codifiers just to have around the City if they :'re only a couple of dollars. Adams noted that the City icy want to use them eventually but should purchase them while they have the chance. Actinq Mayor ahm suggested getting an estimate on such a servic, at would update the municipal code. Frahm asked sturf to use the 10 ordinances that the City has already adopted to get an estimate. Frahm noted that the Council shouldn't take any action until the City receives an estimate for the yearly service. SEPTIC SYSTEM BILLING BIG ISLAND Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained to the Council that this was the first year that Big Island would be billed the annual $20 fee for the septic system inspection program. Gaffron noted that this was for Council's information since they may be getting telephone calls from Big Island residents regarding the billing. Council felt that Big Island residents should be billed just like other Orono residents for the septic system program, and staff should proceed with the billing per the existing code. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT City Engineer Cook was not present. MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Butler was not present and Acting Mayor Frahm had no comments. BID AWARD 1985 MATERIALS i EQUIPMENT* Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to accept the balance of the bids as presented for the calendar year of 1985 and to further reject the bid from H.V. Johnston Culvert Company since they included terms that were contradictory to the City's specifications. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). SALARY ADJUSTMENT TERI HAAB* Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve the salary adjustment of 5% salary increase or from $7.28/hr to $7.65/hr effective March 5, 1985, for Teri Naab. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). LIQUOR STORE OPERATING RESULTS THREE MONTHS ENDED 12-31-84* Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to accept the liquor store operating results prepared by Finance Director Kuehn for three months ended December 31, 1984. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELL) FEBRUARY 25, 1985. PAGE 7 RESOLUTION 11731 HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT WILLOW DRIVE OVERLAY PROJECT* Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to adopt Resolution #1731, a Resolution setting a speed limit of 30 mph along Willow Drive from Fox Street to Burlington Northern Railroad Bridge and indemnifying the MN Department of Transportation from any claims as a result of setting such speed limit. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). POLICE AUCTION ABANDONED VEHICLES* Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve the public auction on March 23, 1985 at 10 a.m. at Martin's 66 Station in Navarre for abandoned, seized, or unclaimed vehicles as listed in Police Chief Kilbo's memo. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). RESOLUTION WINE SALES IN GROCERY STORES Deputy Clerk Lattin explained that the resolution drafted is to prohibit grocery stores from selling wine and such resolution would be sent to the legislature. Lattin noted that 25% of the profits from the municipal liquor store are from wine sales and if grocery stores would start to sell wine it would have a detrimental affect on the liquor store. Lattin stated that historically some of the liquor store profits have been used vo fund general fund expenditures. Lattin stated that the Police Chief will answer as to the affects on the health, safety and welfare such a resolution would have. Police Chief Kilbo explained that the grocery stores are already selling 3.2 beer and the selling of wine probably wouldn't have a dramatic affect on the selling of .liquor to minors. Kilbo stated that the problem becomes a policing one in that it is hard to police the hours that grocery stores can sell such liquors. Councilmember Grabek felt that the City should not spend extra time fighting a piece of legislation that may be passed anyway. Grabek also noted that once the liquor store dips below the profit level it probably should be closed. The concensus of the Council was to not adopt the resolution prohibiting the sale of wine in grocery stores. SALARY AND BENEFIT REVIEW OF CITY EMPLOYERS Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson presented Council witt tabulation of the proposed increases and benefits for City employees. Gerhardson noted that Mr. Cy Smythe is rewriting the personnel policy. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MLETING HELD FEBRUARY 25, 1985. PAGE 8 SALARY & BENEFIT It was recommended that the increases noted on the REVIEW FOR EMPLOYEES tabluation sheet be retroactive back to January 1, 1985. City Attorney Radio asked staff to explain the longevity plan. Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson stated thet the longevity plan is based on the number of years an employee has been with the City as follows: after 4 years with the City an to the base rate after 8 years with the City an to the base rate after 12 years with the City an to the base rate after 16 years with the City an to the base rate increase of 3% in salary increase of 5% in salary increase of 7% in salary increase of 98 in salary Gerhardson noted that the above longevity plan went into effect January 1, 1984 for the police department. Councilmember L. Adams stated that he is interested in fairness to those who are entitled. Adams felt that he was not ready to vote on such a matter because he just received the tatulations. Adams asked staff for the history of raises for employees for the past 5-10 years. Councilmember Grabek asked for the impact suc!� increases would have on the overall city budget. Grabek also asked for a comparison with other cities in regard to salary and benefits. Police Chief Kilbo stated that the sergeant who has been with the City for 16 years is only $39 above the top patrolman's salary. Kilbo noted that the same is true for the assilstant police chief. Kilbo noted that both positions are non -union positions. Kilbo stated it would be more worthwhile for the sergeant and asst. police chief to resign their position and become patrol officers again. Kilbo recommended Council look at these two positions. Acting Mayor Frahm stated that the Council should assure the employees that whatever decision the Council makes would by retroactive back to January 1, 1985. Councilmember L. Adams moved, Acting Mayor Frahm seconded, to assure staff that whatever action is taken regarding salaries and benefits would be retroactive back to January 1, 1985. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). MINUTES Or' THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD PEBRUARY 25, 1985. PAGE 9 Councilmember Grabek directed that staff submit the information received tonight, and the financial information regarding the impact on the budget to Cy Smythe and for him to present something by March 25, 1985, directing Smythe to make an analysis, comparison with other cities, and help formulate policy for next five years including establishing a step program. Grabek asked that the financial information regarding the impact on the 1.985 budget also be submitted to Council. Police Chief Kilbo asked Council to direct Pubic Works Coordinator to draft a memo summarizing the Council's action for the employees. Council so directed. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT HAZARDOUS BUILDING ACTION - 1290 SPRUCE PLACE City Attorney Radio explained that the Council recently adopted a resolution declaring the residence at 1290 Spruce Place a hazardous building. Radio noted that unlike other hazardous building actions, the land owner put in an answer contesting the matter. Radio stated that the property then went into tax forfeiture to the state. Radio stated that the land owner had a chance to redeem, and did not do so as of January 7, 1985, therefore the state now owns the land. l.adio stated that the Council must decide two issues: what to do with the hazardous building and what to do with the property. Radio felt that the City could obtain permission from the state to raze the building, but that the state will not pay for it. Radio stated that the state wants to release the land for sale which would allow the City to recoup its costs for part of the razing through the sale of the property to the general public or to buy it back from the state with an adjustment in the price. Radio stated that the City could also purchase the land for park purposes. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the two adjacent property owners are interested in purchasing the property. Councilmember Grabek moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, directed staff to ask for bids on the razinq of the hazardous building and acquire purchase prices from the DNR. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). Councilmember L. Adams suggested that the Park Commission take a look at this property. Adams also suggested offering the property to the adjacent property owners. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL HEETING HELD FEBRUARY 25, 1985. PAGE10 CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT PWASONNEL MATTERS City Attorney RF:dio suggested that this item be discussed in executive session. LICENSES* Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve the following licenses: Multiple Sclerosis - raffle license Irwin Jacobs - kennel license Duane Anderson - kennel license John. Lanier - kennel license Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). BILLS* Acting Mayor Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, that the All Funds Accounts and the Liquor Store Accounts be paid. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). ADJOURNMENT 9:30 PM Act.Lng Mayor Frahm moved, Counc:lmemLei L. Adams seconded, to adjourn the regular Cuuncil meeting at 9:30 p.m. and enter into executive session. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). ATTEST: thy . Ha lin, City Clerk TfRobas F hm, Acting Mayor AGENDA FOR REGULAR COUNCII, ME1:T'1NG SET FOR MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1985, 7:00 P.M. (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. ROLL CALL TING 1 . CONSI.NT AGEi DA* APPROVAI. OF MINUTES FEB 251985 *2. Regular Mceti; l of February ) ) , 1985 �1 { OF OR ON PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT - Jo Ellen Hurr Representative PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Chairman Edward Callahan PUBLIC COMMENTS ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 3. #853 Douglas Ylint, Tcm Bernier 6 Gary Barr, 3535 - 3545 Ivy Place 3034 Casco Point Road - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangment * #872 Breckenridge Development Company, 1200 Old Crystal Ba;• n-d d - Final Subdivision - Resolution 5. # 8 8 0 Steven Ruce, 4625 West Branch Road - Conditional Use Permit Request for Refund of Application Fee *6. 4886 Richard Ragatz, 1945 Concordia Street - Variance - Resolution 7. Planning For Maintenance of Municipal Code - Municipal Ordinance Codifiers Inc. 7a. Septic System Billing - Big Island CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT MAYOR'S REPORT CABLE TV REPORT TRANSPORTATION REPORT S CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT *8. Bid Award 1985 Materials and Equipment *9. Salary Adjustment Teri Naab - Six Month Review *10. Liquor Store Operating Results - Three Months Ended December 31, 1984 *11. Resolution - Hold Harmless Agreement - willow Drive Overlay Project *12. Police Auction Abandoned Vehicles 13. Wine Sales In Grocery Stores - Resolution 14. Salary & Benefit Review City Employees CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S LETTERS AND MEMOS CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 15. Hazardous Building Action 1290 Spruce Place 16. Personnel Matter's LICENSES (17*) BILLS (18*) ADJOURNMENT A�i -ETING FEB 2S 1985 U f OF ORONO MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBFUARY 11, 1985. PAGE 1 ATTENDANCE 7:03 PM The Orono Council met on thf. above date with the following members present: Mayor B:itler, Councilmembers Grabek, Frahm 'ynn Adams, and Tim Adams. City Attorney Radio was press',, Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson, and Recorder Sutton represented the City staff. City Engineer Cook arrived at8:05p.m. Planning Commission Representative Rovegno was also present. CONSENT AGENDA* Counci lmember Tim Adams asked that items 12 and 20 be removed from the Consent Agenda* for discussion. Councilmember Lynn Adams asked that item 10 also be removed for discussion. Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda*, subject to removing items 10, 12, and 20 from the Consent Agenda for discussion, with all staff reports concerning these items to be attached to an original copy of these minutes on file in the City Clerk's office. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). APPROVAL OF MINUTES* Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Orono Council meeting held January 28, 1985. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT There was no Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Report. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Planning Commission Representative Rovegno was present substituting for Planning Commission Representative Goetten. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments from the public present. #881 KRUTZIG CUSTOM HOMES 1629 -OHM'S POINT RD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #1726* Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve Resolution #1726, A Resolution Denying a Variance to permit additional hardcover. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1985. PAGE 2 #886 RICHARD RAGATZ 1945 CONCORDIA STREET VARIANCE Richard Ragatz was present along with David Kirscht, designer of proposed deck. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that the Planning Commission approved this application subject to Council's findings in the Krutzig application. Gaff ron stated that the hardcover problem is then solved if the deck is not considered hardcover, but the problem is that the deck extends into the 0-75' setback area and decks are considered structures. Richard Ragatz explained that the house was built in 1921 and therefore he didn't have much of a choice on where to place the deck. Ragatz noted that placing the deck on the side of the property is not very acceptable to his neighbors in that the deck would be located directly outside the neighbors bedroom window. David Kirscht showed the Council some slides of the property. Planning Commission Representative Rovegno noted that Ragatz did remove some hardcover within that lakeshore area. Rovegno noted that Planning Commission approved the Ragatz application contingent upon CouncillIs positive findings on the Krutzig application. Rovegno stated that once the hardcover issue was solved, then the Planning Commission had to deal with the question of whether the deck structure within the 0-75' setback zcne is considered a non - encroachment as well. Councilmember Frahm stated that he was at the Planning Commission meeting where this application was reviewed. Frahm noted that the main problem with decks is they were always considered hardcover and therefore the City never got into review of decks because hardcover was not allowed. Frahm noted that this deck does not block the view of any neighbors which was his next concern. Councilmember T. Adams noted that whatever action the Council takes tonight will set a precedent. Adams stated the City should consider drafting new setbacks for lakeshore if certain decks are not considered hardcover. Councilmember L. Adams asked for the average setback of surrounding homes in the area. Adams stated that it looked as if the homes were less than 75' from the lake. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that an average setback study was not done but that it appeared there were homes both less than and more than 75' f rom the lakeshore in the area. MIGUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1985. PAGE 3 City Attorney Radio stated that the City's test for variances has to meet several tests. Radio stated that the question of whether the property can be put to a reasonable use without the approval of the variance works against the applicant in this case, in that the property can be used without the deck. Radio noted that the question of the plight of the land owner due to circumstances unique to his property not created by land owner works in favor of the applicant because of the position of the house and the year the home was built. Radio explained that the question whether approval of this variance would alter the neighborhood works in favor of the applicant in that it will not block any neighbors view of the lakeshore. Radio noted that economic considerations do not constitute approval of the variance alone. Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve the variance request of Richard Ragatz and directed staff to draft a resolution of approval noting the following findings: 1. No view problem would be encountered. 2. The proposed deck only extends lakeward as far as the extension of the west line of the house to the south. 3. The location of an existing_ Box Elder tree and the house to the south are factor-, which limit the acceptable locations for the proposed deck. 4. The location of applicants existing house poses a problem in locating a suitable deck. 5. Applicant has stated that he has removed 150-200 sf of existing hardcover walkways in the 0-75' setback zone. 6. The f ront line of the deck does not and may not extend beyond the front line of the home to the south. 7. Sand is to be placed under the surface of the deck as was done in the Krutzig application to prevent encroachment of hardcover into the 0-75' setback zone. 8. The deck is low to the ground and will not be noticeable from the lake. 9. A deck on either side of the house does not appear to be practical because of limited space. 10. The steep grade of lake starting at about a 30' setback and the average setback of the houses in the area which ,-ppears to be 50-60' rather than the required 75' suggests that the natural non -encroachment area is less than 75'. MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1985. PAGE 4 11. The 15' elevation would give a true distance of 75' from the lake at about a 70' horizontal distance. 12. The variance will not modify the character of the neighborhood. Additional findings should include the Krutzig findings in Resolution #1726. Before the motion was voted upon, discussion continued. Councilmember Grabek noted that he did not vote for the Krutzig application because he was building a new home on lakeshore property and knew the zoning codes prior to building the home. Grabek stated that the past philosophy of the Council has been for the benefit of the lake and the City has been strict on any building within the 0-75' lakeshore setback area. Grabek stated that if the Council passes this motion, that the philosophy of the City is changing for certain reasons such as the home being built prior to the current owner and the general lay of the land because other homes extend beyond this home. Grabek stated that there are plenty of homes in Orono that may have the same hardships as Ragatz. Grabek noted that the general philosophy of the City seems to be changing. Grabek stated that he would have to vote against this motion in order to be consistent with past City decisions. Grabek noted that the Council should be willing to allow everyone else to build within the 75' if they approve Ragatz's application. Councilmember T. Adams felt the same as Councilmember Grabek. Adams noted that this is a 20 percent lakeshore setback variance. Councilmember L. Adams stated that he agrees with the 0-75' setback rule with the lake, but that there are many lots around the lake which have special circumstances that warrant a variance. Adams felt that the Krutzig application was one and that the Ragatz application is another one. Adams noted that he did not feel that this would be a philosophical change to approve this variance. Councilmember Frahm asked that the deck be moved just so it extends along the side of the home and out of the 75' setback zone. Richard Ragatz stated that a mature tree would have to be removed if the deck was to be placed on the side of the property. Ragatz noted also that the neighbors do not wish to have the deck outside their indow and that he is trying to preserve the privacy of bot ,omeoaners. David Kirscht stated that ap, oving this variance would not be precedent setting in that each variance is unique to each individual property and should be reviewed that way. MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1985. PAGE 5 Counci lmember Frahm and T. Adams asked that a compromise be reached maybe by extending only 10 percent into the 0-75' zone and placing decking on the side. They felt that the 20 percent variance was too much to allow and that a 10 percent variance would be better. David Kirscht stated that from a design and function standpoint it would not be feasible. Mayor Butler withdrew the motion. Councilmember L. Adams stated that he would amend his second if the motion was made for a 10 percent variance rather than 20 percent. Councilmember Grabek explained that if the City was going to give the applicant a 10 percent variance, they may as well give him the 20 percent variance. Grabek stated that by giving the applicant only 10 percent it doesn't make the deck very desireable or useable; therefore, the City should be strict and consistent and not allow any structure within the 0-75' zone. Grabek noted if the City's philosophy is going to change and allow structures within that 0-75' zone, what is the difference between 10-20'. Grabek noted the City may as well let the applicant have the 20 percent if they are going to change their philosophy. Grabek asked the Council why penalize the applicant 10' just so the Council feels safer that they are staying within the 75' setback. Richard Ragatz agreed with Councilmember Grabek in that if the City only approved a 10 percent variance the deck would not be as functional. Mayor Butler suggested that Council pick a number to give the applicant guidelines on redesigning his deck. Councilmember Grabek stated that puts the Council in an awkward position in that it makes someone pull out of the air a number that they feel appropriate without any basic sound engineering judgment or any science of decking, or movement of people, and opening of windows or doors. Councilmember Grabek moved, Mayor Butler seconded, to approve the setback variance for Richard Ragatz to construct the proposed deck and direct staff to draft a resolution of approval incorporating all of the findings and conditions made in Mayor Butler's previous motion. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (1). Councilmember Tim Adams voted nay. Councilmember L. Adams asked why Councilmember Grabek changed his opinion. MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1985. PAGE 6 Councilmember Grabek felt that the general concensus of the Council is that they would like to give a variance to this applicant because of the hardships, and before the Council gets to the point of creating an additional hardship on this individual by giving him maybe 2-31, which is the same as giving 20-25' , he felt it should be approved. Grabek sated that the Council should not pull figures/numbers out of the air with no specific reason or engineering rationale. Grabek felt that before the Council gets to the point where they would create additional hardship for the applicant by not making the deck desireable or useable after redesigning the deck, he felt it should be approved. Grabek felt that the Counci l's general trend is that the Counci 1 is going to allow some type of variance, and if they allow some type of variance to the 75' setback zone regulation, then the Counci 1 should give the applicant the 20'. David Kirscht asked that. the 1/2" strip condition be removed in that it would create a "trip strip" because the decking does not have railings, and people would trip over this 1/2" strip. Council agreed that the "trip strip" condition could be removed as long as the applicant places this strip along any portion of the deck that does have railings. #887 FREDERICK WINSTON 765 SPRING HILL RD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #1727* Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve Resolution #1727, A Resolution approving A Variance for Frederick Winston to permit construction of a storage building. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). #890 CLIFF OTTEN 875 WAYZATA BLVD CONCEPTUAL REVIEW C1if f ord Otten waf present. Otten informed Council that he was just polling them on whether the City would like this type of use in Orono and what locations they would prefer. Otten stated that this proposed site at 875 Wayzata Blvd would make it possible for him to combine his Long Lake and Wayzata businesses into one building. Otten stated that he doesn't know if this location will work or not so he may go back to his other possible locations. Councilmember T. Adams stated that this was a perfect use in that its non-sewered commercial. Adams stated that it still gives the surroundings a rural touch. Adams stated that nurseries are ideal in this type of non-sewered commercial zoning district. Adams stated that performance standards should be developed for this possible type of non-sewered commercial zoning. MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1985. PAGE 7 Mayor Butler stated that the site on Old Crystal Bay Road and Highway 12 would have a better access to the property than the property at 875 Wayzata Blvd. Zoning Administrator Mabusth informed the Council that the City should consider the MWCC interceptor that will run along Highway 12, and the developers that will be approaching the City for commercial uses, and should develop and prepare for this in the future. Mabusth asked Council if a professional planner could be hired for consultation with staff to help develop these performance standards for this type of zoning. Mabusth stated that John Shardlow would be the ideal planner to hire in that he worked on the interceptor issue and is also familiar with the City's poli,:ies. Councilmember L. Adams moveL', Councilmember T. Adams seconded, to explore the employment and invite John Shardlow to the Council to discuss a contract to act as a consultant with the City staff for this specific project concerning the non-sewered commercial area and rezoning of highway 12. Motion, Ayes (5) , N., •-s (0) . Councilmember I. Adams asked that the City not put Cliff Otten on hold until after the study is concluded and that the City approve a request for a rezoning. 9:15 PM APPEARANCE MAYOR ART KUNZE CITY OF LONG LAKE CONCEPTUAL REVIEW OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF LONG LAKE SEWER PLANT PROPERTY Long Lake's Mayor Art Kunze was present along with attorney, Arlo Vande Vegte. Kunze noted that he does not have the soil boring tests yet. Kunze stated that the City of Long Lake plans to furnish sewer and water to this site. Kunze noted that this property is useless to the City of Orono in that Orono is not receiving taxes off this property. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated tthe property has 25 acres with only 13 dry buildable acre, Mabusth noted that at a maximum Long Lake would only get 12 to 13 units if developed on rural standards. Mabusth stated that the DNR has new setbacks for structures from Long Lake creek that the City will have to abide by. Mabusth stated that soil borings are being done within the area of the pond to see if this property is buildable. Counci lmember T. Adams stated that even if Long Lake provides sewer and water, it is more of a density question. Adams stated that it causes more problems for Lake Minnetonka to allow that many houses on only 25 acres. Adams explained to Kunze that Orono's philosophy is different from Long Lake's. Adams suggested that Long Lake taxe a look at some of the recent PRD's that have beer done in Orono. Adams stated that he would like to see the two acre density done in the most economical way with or without sewer. ;MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1985. PAGE 8 Councilmember L. Adams asked Kunze if he felt that developing the land to Orono's current zoning code would be unpracticle. Kunze felt that it would be unpracticle and Long Lake might not even develop the land if requested to develop without sewer and water. Mayor Butler noted that this property is in a two acre zoning district. Butler also noted that there is wetlands on the property. Councilmember Frahm noted that this development would set a precedent if Long Lake was allowed to develop without regard to Orono's zoning code. Frahm stated that Orono would have to change their Comprehensive Plan in order to approve this development. Arlo Vande Vegte, attorney, stated that this development would not set a precedent because of the unique circumstances. Vande Vegte stated that the land is owned by another municipality and is adjacent to such municipality Councilmember L. Adams stated that the sewer pond is an eyesore. Adams stated that he would like to see more than 12 units nicely laid out on the land. Adams asked why the City doesn't consider transferring the property over to the City of Long Lake. Mayor Butler explained that the annexation of the sewer pond property over to Long Lake was discussed before and the Council at that time was not in favor of the annexation. Butler noted to Kunze tnat clustering of the homes in a PRD type development would save Long Lake money in running the sewer and water lines to the properties. Councilmember Grabek moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, todirect staff towork with the City of Long Lake to work out a reasonable and feasible plan that meets Orono's zoning codes, and further directs staff to consider the PRD type development. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). Councilmember Grabek asked Kunze if Long Lake would be interested in selling the propert} to Orono. Grabek asked that Kunze come back with a price next time he meets with the Orono Council if hp is intereste-3 in selling the property. Councilmember L. Adams stated that he is interested in Long Lake's developing the property to Orono's standards (12 houses with no sewers) and then deeding the property to Long Lake because it is adjacent to Long Lake. Adams stated that if it became a part of Long Lake and they put restrictions in the title of the two acre lots, that they could not be subdivided, it would be a buffer zone. MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1985. PAGE 9 CRYSTAL BAY SEWER PROJECT REPORT City Engineer Cook reviewed with the Council the plans and specs of the Crystal Bay Sewer Project. Cook noted that the assessment hearing would be held April 22, 1985. Mayor Butler asked staff to reserve the Art Center's Auditorium for the assessment hearing on April 22, 1985 and the regular Council meeting will be held that night also. Butler suggested a bulk mailing to the general public so that they know ;ghat portion of the sewer project they will have to pay also. Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to approve the plans and specs and direct staff to advertise for bids. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). Ci` v engineer Cook stated that he needs Council permission to begin the easement acquisition procedure. Councilmember Frahm stated that the City should not go to such expense until they are sure whether the sewer project will go through or not. Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to direct staff to begin the easement acquisition procedure. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (1). Councilmember Frahm voted nay. City Engineer Cook noted the additional costs in regard to the cost of instal ling City water at the same time the sewer is installed. Cook stated that there are two options for providing water service to the area. Cook noted the estimated cost for the lateral system is $297,060 resulting in a unit cost of $3,580 for 83 units. Cook noted the estimated cost for the well and pressure system is $289,800 and the estimated cost for the trunk water line from Long Lake is $514,380. Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to cease further discussion or investigation into the idea of installing water at the same time in the Crystal Bay area. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Butler told the Council of phone calls that she has been receiving from a Mound resident (Ron. Johnson) who is asking that the Orono Council draft a letter to the City Council of Mound opposing the development at Pelican Point in Mound. Butler explained that this development is proposing massive dockage. MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELM FEBRUARY 11, 1985. PAGE 10 The Council consensus was that Orono should not write a letter. Council suggested that staff contact Jo Ellen Hurr (LMCD representative) and see if she can enlighten Mound on Orono's philosophy. Council also asked for an update from Hurr regarding Chaska Marine's license application with the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District. CABLE TV REPORT Mayor Butler announced an executive board meeting regarding Cable TV to be held February 12, 1985 at 7:00 p.m. SEASONAL WEIGHT RESTRICTIONS RESOLUTION #1728 Councilmember L. Adams asked staff to reword some of the memo to read "signs of any breakup" rather than "severe breakup". Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to approve Resolution #1728, A Resolution designating weight restrictions for most of Orono's road, subject to the amendment in memo noted above. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). CASH i INVESTMENTS AS OF DEC. 84* Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve Finance Director Kuehn's memo dated February 4, 1985, concerning the cash and investments as of December 31, 1984. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). POLICE CONTRACT Councilmember T. Adams asked for clarification on parts of the police contract. Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve the police contract for 1985. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). EMPLOYMENT POLICE OFFICER ENGLISH* Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve the employment of Irving Hubbard English, III effective February 11, 1985, with a starting salary of $1,576 per month. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). SQUAD CAR REPLACEMENT* Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve the squad car purchase to replace squad car #142 which was totalled in an accident. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS SINGLE AXLE DUMP TRUCK* Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve the specifications of a new single axle dump truck and hydraulic sander and to authorize advertising for bids with the bid opening to be held March 15, 1985. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL .'ING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1985. PAGE 11 LEGAL NEWSPAPER PUBLICATIONS* Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to appoint the Laker as the official newspaper which would service all of Orono and dropping the MN Suburban News (Sun). Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). REFUND OF SAC CHARGE TO HOMMEYER* Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded to approve the refund of $425 (SAC charge) to Charles Hommeyer at 4125 Oak Street finding that two SAC charges were charged to this property. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). SUMMARIES OF RECEIPTS, DISBURSEMENTS i BALANCES* Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve the Summaries of Receipts, Disbursements, and Balances prepared by Finance Director Kuehn. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). WINE -IN GROCERY STORES --RESOLUTION Councilmember T. Ada. -as asked that this item be removed from the Consent Agenda. Adams asked why the City should b,. opposed to the sale of wine in grocery stores. Adams stated that if the public wants to buy their wine from grocery stores then they should be allowed to. Mayor Butler stated that the City has its own liquor store and the sale of wine in grocery stores would have a drastic effect on the profits from the municipal liquor store. Councilmember L. Adams explained that it might have something to do with the control of sale of wine to minors in that the liquor stores might have more control. Councilmember Grabek moved, Councilmember T. Adams seconded, to table this Resolution for futher information from City staff. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT WELSH MATTER BENSON EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT City Attorney Radio noted his memo regarding the Welsh matter was for information only. Radio requested approval of the Walter R. Benson contract with the City. Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember T. Adams seconded, to approve the employment contract with Walter R. Benson. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCII. MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1985. PAGE 12 LICENSES* Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to approve the following licenses: Lakeview Golf --Cigarette license Crystal Bay Service --Cigarette license Maxwell Alvord--Kennel license Robert Waag--Kennel license John Traul--Kennel license Frank Kokesh--Kennel license Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). BILLS* Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember I. Adams seconded, that the All Funds Accounts and Liquo.L --tore Accounts be paid. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). ADJOURNMENT 10:23 PM Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to adjourn the regular Council meeting at 10:23 p.m. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0). ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor TO: Mayor Butler Orono Councilmembers FROM: Jean A. Mabusth DATE: Fe' . 1985 SUBJECT: #853 L_ s Klint, Tom and 3545 ivy Place and Preliminary Subdivision AL 1lCETNO FEB 29r1985 e OF OR= Bernier, and Gary Barr, 3535 3034 Casco Point Road - Zoning District - LR-lC Area = 2.7 acres exclusive of road right of way Application = Plat - I.ot Line Rearrangement List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owner's List Exhibit P - Preliminary Plan The proposed lot line rearrangement_ of the three developed lots will provide riparian access to the Barr and former Bernier residences. All three lots meet the required 1/2 acre minimum lot area and 100 feet minimum lot width per LR-1C zoning district. No setback encroachments would be created for existing houses and accessory structures as a result of this division. The plat reflects the partial vacation of Maple Avenue. The area designated on plat as "to be dedicated as road" within Ivy Lane right of way has already been granted to City via quit claim deed per condition of Maple Avenue vacation of two months ago. Plat should be corrected. The municipal sewer- and water lines have been located and designated as 20 feet wide utility easements at engineer's request. The utility easements do not restrict the proposed building envelopes. A drainageway that intersects Lot 2 and 3 has been provided for by increasing the utility and drainage easement width to 10 feet on either side of the shared lot line. Staff recommends approval of the plat of a lot line rearrangement known as Casco Cove finding all lc:s meet the standards of the LR-IC zoning district and that all existing structures meet the required setbacks for the district. Approval is subject to the condition that the plat be amended to reflect the City's ownership of that portion of Ivy Lane referred to on the preliminary plat as "to be dedicated as road". Date Reed '? — az(O-'9-1f'- r''rt B}e , r Feec d CITY OF ORONO '0�' L- ,#*,.;h" ) 3 SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM %.•00' -------------------------------/----/--------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name _I v4L L 1 n T Telephone Mailing Address /YS" r%nJ LIAA& /-,.„ovi1� Mph lrlry'7 PROPERTY Name S Arm Telephone OWNER Mailing Address (Attach list if more than one -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Street Address 3 S 41 S Property Identification No. (P.I.D.) Complete Legal Description to be attached to application ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels 't V Development Size = Acres Dry Land _ Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check) VACAnipl- Residential; no. of units Other (specify) Present Zoning District Z, - IC. it -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: 3 E'isting Units p New Units Z Total Units Proposed Gross Density / Units per Y�?— Acres Minimum Lot Size: Square Feet Dry Buildable Land Pro r - A 2 6 04 Use: (check) �, Residential Other (specify) LL 'L k Gf1Y OF OROfO MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Application Completed 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owner's list. of owners within 350' (this list can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 4. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (110) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of. security. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) $100.00 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivisions) $250.00 Preliminary Review $240.00 plus (Class III and all non-residential) 20.00/lot _ Final Plat Review (Class III) $100.00* *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Applicant rust have all submittals into the City offices 25 day,41before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third I I b bd is 0 ,-j -ev N� V r , I .%. A 451 5. pt 1, , 0 �S Ing or ovec -e IV r% @-, 5.,. I'A Of I Ti ON. le Al 0 4 01084 3 3) Al R.L. Sr",- A A Oj I I I Ds�'J� f- 14. A L it! G 0 111] 44 Al F L M .i / S • 4rp 110 3 Pj "1 109 0 45,1 0 r. , > S,�v e . , 1. " ci .? Z .. I :&F -.m• �s , 97 106/, 0 0 174 Oil, .96 /" 105 0 \ - Wft lip, 1716 of 10 p JR) 94 C. 7 on Ira 14) k,- 0 17q Ao , 1 , ^'i A/ ICU y- o .213 Cbl 1vo '0 zt TI, P, -Y ? % Ssi e6 le 161 le, Le 65• 160 Ll --1 o 158 c w 166'% A 16 7 ;5 J68 169s, 60 A 171 5 56 3 41 AV A 1 ()jk V :FAL C5 m RUN DATE 05/22/84 BATCH 003 38 20-117-23 31 0038 PROP AOOR 02 "0 CASCO POINT RD OWNER NAME 0 Z J MORRIS TAXPAYER DAVID Y A JOAN P MORRIS NAME/AODR 2990 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0020 PROP ADDR 03020 CASCO POINT RD OWNER NAME JOSEPM E BR•UN ET AL TAXPAYER CARO;. J KE-LY NAME/ADOR 3020 CASCU POINT RD WAYZATA MH 55391 38 20-117.23 42 0006 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME STATE LA'n DEPT TAXPAYER STATE LAND DEPT NAME/ADOR 38 20-117-23 42 0017 PROP ADDR 03548 IVY PL OWNER NAME JACK LEHTINEN TAXPAYER JACK LEHTINEN NAME/ADOR 3548 IVY PLACE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0022 PROP ADOR 03516 IVY PL OWNER NAME W R BERG A K J BERG TAXPAYER WILLIAM R BERG NAME/ADDR 8602 NO DOVE CIRCLE PHOENIX ARIZONA 8SO28 38 20-117-23 42 0025 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME DOUGLAS E KLINT TAXPAYER DOUGLAS E KLINT NAME/AOOR 145 INLAND LANE N PLYMOUTH MN 55447 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 20-117-23 34 0003 03015 CASCO POINT RD R G LAURIE ETAL R G LAURIE 3015 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0001 JAMES W LUPIENT JAMES W LUPIENT 7I00 WAYZATA BL�'D MPLS MH 55426 38 20-117-23 42 0015 03271 CASCO CIR MARY E LANG ETAL M E LANG A D I GOMEZ 3271 CASCO POINT CIRCLE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0018 03546 IVY PL A H JEWETT ETAL ARTHUR H JEWETT 3546 IVY PLACE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0023 03510 IVY PL STEPHEN B WILSON i WIFE STEPIIEII B WILSON 3508 IVY PLACE ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0026 DOUGLAS E KLINT DOUGLAS E KLINT 145 INLAID LANE N PLYMOUTH MN 55447 c-.lblc--)t 0 G i REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 7 38 20-117-23 34 0012 03045 CASCO POINT RD JOAN V LAWRENCE JOAN V LAWRENCE 3045 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0004 STATE LAID DEPT STATE LAND DEPT 38 20-117-23 42 0016 03550 IVY PL MPLS SAV AND LN LARRY 0 BERKLAI--D 3550 IVY PLACE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0^19 03534 IVY PL FRANI( J BUYSSE FRAIM J BUYSSE 3534 IVY PLACE WAYZATA MH 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0024 03508 IVY PL STEPHEN B WILSON R WIFE STEPHEN B WILSON 3508 IVY PLACE ORONO MN 55391 3C 1-117-23 42 0027 03560 IVY PL JOHN H HONOUR VII i WIFE JOHN H HONOUR VII 3560 IVY PLACE WAYZATA MH 55391 �L) JUL 2 f 1984 � - -'' CITY Of Cr?►:.;� x X 1 1 -- �' -y ( r RLIN DATE 0S/22/84 HEfINEPIN COUTITY PROPERTY INFCPHATION SYSTEM REPORT NO. PI'r35401 PROPERTY 0WNERS LIST PAGE 8 BATCH 003 38 20-117-23 42 0028 PROP ADDR 03535 IVY PL OWNER NAME OLMSTED FED SAV/LN ASSOC TAXPAYER T J BERNIER A B C BERNIER NAME/ADDR 3535 IVY PLACE ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0032 PROP ADDR 03509 IVY PL OWNER NAME QUENTIN JOHNSON A WIFE TAXPAYER QUENTIN JOHNSON NAME/ADDR 3509 IVY PLACE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0031 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME THE CASCO CO TAXPAYER THE CASCO COMPANY NAME/ADDR ROBERT 0 MACNIE 3135 CASCO CIR, WAYZATA MH 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0037 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME STATE LAND DEPT TAXPAYER I D A VIRGINIA A CAPLES NAME/AOOR BOX '•14 OSS! J t1N 55369 38 20-117-23 43 0040 PROP ADDR 03034 CASCO POINT RD OWNER NAME GARY A BARR TAXPAYER GARY A BARR NAtlE/ADDR 1013 ADAMS OR KEY LARGO FLA 33037 38 20-117 23 43 0044 PROP ADDR 03287 CASCO CIR OWNER NA!'E JACK R MCCULLOUGH ETAL TAXPAYER JACK R MCCULLOCH NAME/ADDR 3287 CASCO CIRCLE WAYZATA Mttl 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0029 03525 IVY PL R A V TUCKER ROBERT A VIRGINIA TUCKER 3525 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0033 03532 IVY PL R G BARTIKOSKI ET AL ROBERT G BARTIKOSK.I 3532 IVY PL WAYZATA 11N 55391 38 20-117-?3 43 0035 03040 CASCO POINT RD J H MOGAN ETAL JOHN H HOGAN 3040 CASCO POINT PO WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0038 GARY A BARR GAPY A CARP 1013 ADA1tS OR KEY LARGO FLA 33037 38 20-117-23 43 0042 03277 CASCO CIR LEE GEINERT ETAL LEE GEINERT 3277 CASCO LANE WAYZATA HN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0045 03297 CASCO CIR 0 A M OAS DAIIIEL 0 S MADONNA J OAS 3297 CASCO CIPCLE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0031 03486 IVY PL JAMES A LOVESTRAHD A WIFE JAMES A LOVESTRAtl0 3486 IVY PL WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0001 03030 CASCO POINT RD GECRGE JEtIOS ETAL GEORGE JENOS 6143 ARCTIC WAY EDINA MIl 55436 38 20-117-23 43 0036 03033 CA « 0 POINT RD I P DOOTH S WIFE IAN P BOOTH 3038 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA tttl 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0039 03034 CASCO POItlT RD GARY A BARR GARY A CAPP 1013 ADAMS DR KEY LARGO FLA 33037 38 20-117-23 43 0043 03277 CASCO CIR LLE GEINERT ETAL LEE GEINERT 3277 CASCO LANE WAYZATA t24 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0048 03305 CASCO CIR ECKARD MUENCK A WIFE ECKARD MIlrf,CK 3305 CASCO CIRCLE WAYZATA two 55391 RUN DITE 05/22/84 HENHEPIN COLTITY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT 1:0. PI435401 PRG. ERTY 014NEP5 LIST PAGE 9 BATCH 003 38 20-117-.:3 43 0049 PROP ADDR 03309 CAjCO CIR OWNER NAME STEWART R PERRY AS TRUSTEE TAXPAYER LAWRENCE L BRUSiAD NAME/ADDR 3309 CASCO CIRCLE WAYZATA MN 55391 TOTAL BATCH 003 00037 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION CF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE CH THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROP RTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF Mi YPIOWLEDGE AIID BELIEF, " ` DATE "J , 1 BY r I' I *tLETING FEB 251985 To: Mayor Butler Orono Council Members OF ORONO From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date: February 20, 1985 Subject: #872 Breckenridge Development Corporation 1200 Old Crystal Bay Road - Final Subdivision Resolution The applicant has fulfilled all conditions of preliminary approval and has submitted all the necessary documents. Staff recommends approval of the plat Breckenridge subject to the findings and conditions set forth in the enclosed resolution. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF BRECKENRIDGE FILE NO. 872 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and eyist ing under the laws of thF State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "City Council") has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Counr.i1 has considered the application for a subdivision by the Breckenridge Development Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation, the subdivider; and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the RR-1B zoning district finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that will allow its use as a single family residence to be fully developed without the need of any variances; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 1697 on November 13, 1964 approving a special exception to Rural sewage Treatment Policy No. 7 of Orono's Comprehensive Sewer Policy permitting one sewer connection for Lot 2, Block 1 Breckenridge; and WHEREAS, tic subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, incluCing: 1. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility easements. 2. Dedication on the plat of rights -of -way for public roads, shown as County Road No. 51 and County Road No. 84. 3. Dedication to the City of a Flowage and Conservation Easement providing for limitations on the use of drainage - ways described therein and shown on the plat as "drainage easements". 4. Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fee in the amount of $200.00. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 5. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat, easements and covenants in the amount of $75.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Counci 1 of the City of Orono hereby approves the F lat of Breckenridge, Hennepin County, Minnesota; subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the City issuing a building permit for new residence on Lot 2, Block 1 Breckenridge, the future owner must submit the following to the City: a) Copy of executed Metropolitan waste Control Commission permit for connection to metro owned sewer line. b) Access permit from Hennepin County Highway Department. 2. Payment of $225.00 sewer unit charge with building permit. 3. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Registrar of Titles of the County of Hennepin on or before August 25, 19F5 together with a certified original. copy of this Resolution and executed copies of the easements and covenants noted above. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota, this 25th day of February, 1985. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hall.in, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor .r. FEB d 1985 Ci : Y OF ORONO To: Orono Council Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator Date: February 14, 19V Subject: #880 Steven Ruce, 4625 West Branch Road - Request For Refund of Conditional Use Permit Fee List c` Exhibits Exhibit A - I..etter of Request of Refund Exhibit B - Application Exhibit C - Planning Commission Memo Exhibit D - Planning Commission Minutes Exhibit E - Council Memo Exhibit F - Council Minutes Exhibit G - Resolution Mr. Ruce was made to apply for a Conditional Use Permit for an attached greenhouse based on his statements to staff that he would be growing some plants for sale to others in off -site locations, hence a "commercial" use. Planning Commission questioned whether the proposed use was of high enough intensity to even require a CUP, and asked staff to investigate whether the fee could be refunded. Council did not address this issue in their review of the appli- cation. Council did grant the CUP. Applicant is requesting that you refund his $100.00 fee based on the Planning Commission recommenda- tion. If. you feel this application was justified and required, a motion for denial )f the refund is in order. If you feel applicant should not have had to come in for the CUP, you may wish to reconsider. Note that staff has submitted the resolution to the City Attorney for fi ling. The resolution and certain items from the application, and applicants letter of request are included. cl, ;n;li I 11 P.E. rx; x C ry s t ta F -ty r c. : Ta CITY OF ORONO 66 P.O. BOX 66 GENERAL RECEIPT CRY$ L BAY, MN 55323 TE L( P ONE: 473-7358 Receivpd of 0M For ez Fund Object Program Div. , Amount N° 16387 A) 19 S�z a s DOLLARS 16 ZONING FILE NO 880 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal nay, 1.11, 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice 12/13/84 ------------------------------------- ------------------------- TO: Steven Ruce COPIES TO: 4625 West Branch Road Mound, MIN 55364 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of Meeting: 12/10/84 Vote: 4 For Against COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION: Approve Conditional Use Permit per the attached Resoluti�—,, No. 1712. Council did not address the issue of refunding the application fee, although the question was brought up in staff's memo to council. If you wish to pursue this, we suggest you write a letter addressed to the City Council at the above listed address outlining your request. Your $40 sign refund wi 11 be mailed the 1st week of January 10,85. ----------------------------------------------------------------- XY. CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL expires upon change of ownership or use, or on deadline date specified above. If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Recorder of City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. F r ,- CITY OF ORONO p19 GASHERAL LAND USE APPLICATION /00 3tJ , I . A PROPERTY LOCATION � jr,h�.tj� 4�-(,,yl PUNL� 7Q Site Address 4641 P-operty Identification Number (P.I.D.) Please check one -- Is the property ✓ abstract or torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name (SiUn(C Iq Pu-u: l_. Mailing Address yq-F-sr Phone 'T7 L. - (uis y -------------------------------------------------------------------------- OWNER p Name 1 �� t_(1 t\!IC:F,, Phone �i-�L-���,�% Mailing Address 4-U4,1 ��fEA i Ach 'OAf? . NOtAPIQ P��V-':S30 .1 1 \ Date Property Acquired 1 (month/year) I I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PEES - Conditional Jse Permits---------------------- -- _ _ i� $100.00 a) Residential Accessory Use ` OCT 2 5 W $100.00 b) Institutional ichurch, school, etrt f $100.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg d) Land Alteration (grading, filling) $150. Commercial/Industrial Use PRD/PID - see fee schedule Other Applications $200.00 Vacation $230.00 Rezoning $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District �(%.�LI �S,r1: �F Fjl�ft_� Present Use of Property ✓ Residential Other (specify) ------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- DESCRIP11ON OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: 17, A_- :.�. , . - r- r= .. A•'' -.A .• -%� � AST // !T•,1PrV r-ERNN4l- u.- �1 1 i 1 J �_ i /1 i •n� r • :,i��- / f' ILIF � ,�'i ! � ! � 1 ----- r- ----- -- -___C�__ t------- `-------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS bV Completed Application Form. 2,! Certif ied Property Owners List of owner s within 350' (you can obtain this list (/ from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603Government Center 348-3271) L� Stamped, legal sized envelopes (110) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Construction plans, if applicable. VPlat Map. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. ---------------------------------- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusua I expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of•his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature ' 'l Date a. r- t OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this �equest. Owner's signature 1,J Date j ----------------------------- Applicant must have all submittals -into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. TO: Planning Commission Irmn: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator OATS: November 15, 1984 SUBJBCT: 1888, Steven J. Ruce, 4625 West Branch Road - Conditional Use Permit Zoning District - RR-lB - 2 acre unsewered Application - Conditional Use Permit for a commercial greenhouse attached to existing dwelling List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - property owners List 0 - Site Plan E - Typical Construction Plan The applicant wishes co construct a 18' X 25' greenhouse attached to the existing dwelling. The use would be somewhat commercial in that applicant plans to sell some plants to others at off -site locations. The planned structure and use would have no effect on the septic system, would not appear to create additional traffic or cause any neighborhood hazards, and meets all setback requirements. Note that this is a 1 acre lot in a 2 acre zone. Staff would recommend approval, with the condition that the structure conform to all pertinent Building Code requirements, and that no retail sales activity take place on the property. r MINUTESOF THEPLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 19,1984PAGE 13 #878 THOMAS RAUL further regulations beyond those provided for the zoning code. I find that this is a home occupation that doesn't require application to the Planning Commission or City Council. #P25 TEVEN RUCE ESTBRANCH ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 8:00 - 8:06 PM McDonald added that the home occupations code should state that: hotels and boarding houses not be included in the code. Kelley moved, Rovegno seconded, recommendation to staff to review the planning ordiances to find the appropriate sections that should be amended and reviewed by the PC and City Council for B&B's within the City of Orono. Adams commented that he believes there is a place in Orono for B&B's and this is a oversite in the code. Is a 100% in favor of the motion. Motion, Ayes (6), Nay (0). Steven & Joyce Ruce were present. Zoning Adminis- trator Mabusth noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was no one present from the public. Ruce is requesting to build a greenhouse 10 x 25 in the rear of the property attached to the house. Gaffron stated that it does meet all setback requirements and doesn't affect the septic system. There is a deck in the back of the house. The question ai.ses because Mr. Ruce has some commer- cial dealings outside the home. Ruce explained that he is a gardener and works in other peoples gardens. In the spring of the year he grows plants to use in their gardens, which is the purpose of the greenhouse. There is no walk-in traffic. Ruce also stated that the deck would be removed so the greenhouse may be built. This would not include the deck on the east side of the house. Gaffron noted tl)at there are no hardcover problems. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 19, 1984 PAGE 14 #880 STEVEN RUCE McDonald clarified that the CUP goes with the property if the house is sold but Council can ask to have it reviewed. Mabusth stated that there is no need to put on a review policy of once a year because of the boiler plate language used in the resolution. Rovengno questioned the fact that it was considered as a commercial greenhouse because it is not large enough, there are no people or vehicles coming in. Rovegno stated he would like to have a recommendation that they overrule staff, because a 10' x 25' attached greenhouse used to grow plants not for sale on the premises should not be considered on a size basis to require a CUP. Kelley moved, Rovegno seconded, to recommend appro- val of #880 Steven Ruce, with the condition that the structure conform to all pertinent Building Code requirements and also to recommend to the City Council to review the posibility of refunding $150.00 filing fee based on the finding that there is no retail sales activity taking place on the property. McDonald questioned the use of trucks and Ruce clarified that he only had two pick-up trucks that would be used. Motion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). TO: Council FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE: November 15, 1984 SUBJECT: #880 Steven Ruce, 4625 West Brar,n Road - Conditional Use Permit f :► r �L� Zoning District - RR-1B - 2 acre unsewered Application - Conditional Use Permit for a commercial greenhouse attached to existing dwelling. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Site Plan Exhibit E - Typical Construction Plan Exhibit F - Copy of Planning Commission Action Notice Exhibit G - Code Sections Pertinent (Commercial Use) The applicant wishes to construct a 10' x 25' greenhouse attached to tho existing dwelling. The use would be somewhat commercial in that applicant plans to sell some plants to others at off -site locations. The planned structure and use would have no of fect on the septic system, would not appear to create additional traffic or cause any neighborhood hazards, and meets all setback requirements. Note that this is a one acre lot in a two acre zone. Planning Commission at their November 19, 1984, meeting found that no retail sales activity was proposed to take place on the property, and recommended approval subject to the structure conforming to all pertinent building code requirements. Planning Commission also questioned whether the proposed use is intense enough to even require a conditional use permit, and recommended that staff review the possibility of refunding the conditional use permit application fee. This was brought in as an application for a commercial greenhouse conditional use permit per Section 10. 20, Subd 3(E). It may instead fall under the "home occupation" standards [10.20 Subd 4(c)] as an accessory use. A resolution of approval for the conditional use permit is attached. MINUTE!; OF THE 141:GULAINZ OkONO COUNCIL. Mla•:'1'INC: Ill:l.l) UI:CEMBER 10, 1984 PAGE 10 5. The property has been assessed for sewer. 6. The property has been assessed for water and was assessed a separate water unit for each lot. 7. The lot area is consistent with many other properties in the neighborhood and is equivalent to or larger than I of 25 lots in the neighborhood. Approval conditions to include: 1. Granting a variance to the setbacks for the existing house on Lot 22. 2. No other performance standard setbacks allowed for either lot (i.e. both lots must meet a l l hardcover and setback requirements). 3. Payment of a park fee for new lot in the amount of $430. 4. $225 sewer plant charge to be paid with building permit along wits► standard SAC charges, etc. 5. Applicants to bear the expense of bringing sewer and water to the property if no stubs exist. 6. Maximum hardcover of Lot 21 to be 2, 280 sf including roofs, decks, driveways, sidewalks, patios, terraces, etc. 7. Applicant placed on nctice of the hardcover limitations for both lots. 8. No other variances will be granted. Motion, Ayes (3),Nays (1). Counci.lmemberAdams voted nay. Adams felt that this application is beyond the borderline for approval, and that the Council has to draw the line somewhere. Mayor Butler noted that the resolution should be filed in the chain of title of both lots. 4680-STEVEN RUCE 4625 WEST BRANCH ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION 11712* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Hammerel seconded, to approve Resolution #1712, A Resolution Granting A Conditional Use Permit to permit construction of a green house with limited commercial use. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1712 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.20, SUBD 3(E) - FILE NO. 880 WHEREAS, Steven Ruce (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 4625 Wrest Branch Road located within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: The north 208 and 71/100 feet of the East 208 and 71/100 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 7, Township 117 North Range 23 West. (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a Conditional Use Permit to permit the use of an attached 10' x 25' greenhouse for commercial purposes per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.20, Subdivision 3(E). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: Findings 1. The application was reviewed as Zoning File No. 880. 2. The property is located in the RR-lB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. 3. On November 19, 1984, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the application as proposed and recommended approval, f inding that no retail sales activity is proposed to take place on the property, that no setback variances would be required, no addi tional traf f is to or from the property would be created, and the proposal would have no effect on the septic system, subject to the condition that the structure conform to all pertinent sections of the Building Code. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 1 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1712 5. The City Council finds that granting a Conditional Use Permit to allow the commercial use of the attached 10' x 25' greenhouse will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Conclusions, Order and Conditions Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.20, Subd 3(E) to permit the use of an attached 10' x 25' greenhouse for commercial purposes, subject to the following conditions: 1. No retail sales activity may take place on the property. 2. Al.l outside storage of materials or ec -iipment must be fenced in such a manner sc as to screen the stored material f rom view When observed from the public street or adjoining lot. 3. As a home occupation, the following performance standards further apply: a) Entrance to the greenhouse must be gained from within the house. b) No sign permitted other than those normally allowed in residential districts. C) No employees allowed to wor): on the site. 4. The structure must conform to all pertinent Building Code requirements. Page 2 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1712 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned owner has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this loth day of December, 1984. ATTEST: rothy If hallin, City Clerk t r, Propert ner(a Property Owner(s) Property owner(s) Mary C. Butler,, Mayor �— Spouse Spouse pouse Pa" 3 o IF 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1712 STATE OF PSI IJ;: ESO T A ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPI!: ) On this / day of ca,•/I/ — 1984, before me a Notary Public n�ithin ,and of r saw County, personally appeared 0'.«4known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument. and acknowledged that he (they) executed the sane as his (their) free act and deed. jWN R. OERHAR090N iY /USUGYINNE50TA COUNTY 04M STATE OF 111IUNESOTA ) ) ss. COUt: T Y OF HENI:EPI!: ) 140TARY PUEUC r---- NAY COMMJSSIOt. EXPIRES On this day of , 1984, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared knowr, tr, me to be the persons) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY CUttNI5510t; Er.Plitlr V!. ��LETNIIG FEB 251985 To: Orono Council Members L-i i OF `'R940 From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator 4� C.' Date: February 21, 1985 Subject: #886 Richard Ragatz, 1945 Concordia Street - Variance - Resolution - Consent Agenda Item Attached is a proposed resolution on the Ragatz variance application. Note that in being consistent with the Krutzig Resolution, you are finding that the deck as approved under the stated conditions is not considered hardcc,►er, hence no hardcover variance is granted, merely a variance to 'ow the structure in the 0-75' setback zone. If you have any questions or changes to this resolution, please feel free to remove this item from the consent agenda for discussion. We will continue to consider "decks" in the generic sense as hardcover. When an applicant then requests a variance to the hardcover percentage allowed, we will take it in as a variance application, and although you may in many cases "deny a variance" while allowing a non -hardcover deck, you will maintain a certain amount of control over future use of the deck by filing the resolution with conditions in the chain of title of the property. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL GRANTING A VA1t " MUNICIPAL ZONI,� CODE SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8, AND SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 FILE #886 WHEREAS, Richard Ragatz (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 1945 Concordia Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 11, Fagerness, Hennepin County, Minnesota, (hereinafter "Property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit the construction of a 770 square foot deck structure of which 404 square feet is to be located 60 feet from the lakeshore and within the 0-75 foot lakeshore setback zone where no permanent or temporary structures are normally allowed. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File No. 886. 2. This property is located within the LR-lC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 21, 1985 and recommended approval conditioned on favorable findings by Council that decks which meet certain design standards are not considered as hardcover. 4. No view problem would be encountered. The proposed deck only extends lakeward as far as the ension of the west line of the house to the south. The location of an existing Box Elder tree and the house the south are factors which limit the acceptable ications for the proposed deck. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7. The location of applicants existing house poses a problem in locating a suitable deck. 8. Applicant has stated that he has removed 150-200 square feet of existing hardcover walkways in the 0-75' setback zcne. 9. The front line of the proposed deck does not extend beyond the front line of the ' me to the south. 10. Sand is to be placed under the surface of the deck as was done 4n the Krutzig application (Resolution No. 1726) to prevent encroachment of hardcover into the 0-75' setback zone, hence no hardcover variance is required. 11. The deck is low to the ground and wi ] 1 not be noticeable front the lake. 12. A deck on either side of the house does not appear to be practical because of limited space. 13. The steep grade of lake starting at about 30' setback and the average setback of the houses in the area which appears to be 50-60' rather than the required 75' suggests that the natural non -encroachment area is less than 75'. 14. The 15' elevation and steep slope would give a true overland run-off distance of 75' from the lake at about a 70' horizontal distance. 15. The variance will not modify the character of the neighborhood. 16. The proposed deck still meets the Minnesota Dcpartment of Natural Resources 50' minimum setback for General Development lakes such as Lake Minnetonka. 17. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY :OUNCIL NO. The City Council finds that- ti:-• conditions existing on this property aie peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granti,ig the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, lic!-,r, air nor pose a F..re hazard or other danger to neighboring property; ..ould not merely serve as a convenience to the appli(-.,nt, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSII',NS, ORDER CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Minicipa Code Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 and Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the construction of a i70 square foot deck Ltructurrof which 404 square feet iF to be 1c7ated 60 feet from the lakeshore and within the 0-75 foot Lakeshore setback zone where no structures are normally allowed, subject to the following conditions: 1. A permit .-or the deck must be obtained prior to --nstruction. The entire deck must meet the foll,ving minimurr. design re.., -emen* s: a) width of de._king boards may range from no less than 4" to no more than 8" in width. b) Ratio of board w5.. th to spacing wii ch may he no greater tha;, ? ? :1 ' 8.3» raper, space). c) A 1 -inch hi:-:- ,._;od strip must be installed along the uF; perimeter of the deck to ftevent direct run- off, nxcep-, where railing will not be installed. d) H minimum of a 12-inch under the ertire area downward thr.igh any fill surfa�^e. depth of sand must be pla- of the -eck and extent' sayers to the original e) The deck N :t urm sires be no higher than 12 finished graOc , or if it is higher, suitable i� :• mu- t he plat betweei. the deck ground t.. prevent .,jy acc •r which a i : _)w future p: ment of impermeablr ..iteiials ,,. st:-, concrete slab, etc.) under I' det.-►r. city or OR ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2. No more than 404 square feet of the deck: area may extend to the 0-.'5 foot setback zone. The deck may extend no i..:ther lakeward than the extended front line of the adjacent house to the south. 3. The applicant is placed on noti -1 that ' `ie deck and the areas above and below it within the !i '5' setback zone may never be covered with impervious _,.teri. :s, enclosed, or in any way altered so as to become hardcover, without the granting of a hardcover variance by this or a future city Council. 4. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the owner, but are permissive only and mu.4t be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of IL'Dunci 1 app.,-oval, or this variance will expire on that date (February 25, 1986). 5. Violation of or non- compl;;nce with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically term; .e any authority granted herein, and shall he punishable as , misdemeanor. 6. The undersiqned zpplicant has read, understood and here- by agre-s to the terms L)f this resolution and on behalf of himself, his neirs, successors and assigns, hereby a-- es to the recording of this resolution in the chin of a of the property. Adopted by the City Council on 2th day of February 19PS. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk (1) Property Owner Mary C. Butler, Meyor To: Mayor Butler Orono Council Members From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, joning Administrator Date: February 21, 1985 Subject: Planning For Maintenance of Municipal Code IL +�. s LETING FEB 2S 1985 kn. - f, OF 0PQ.go As Roger Jensen's letter notes, I }--ve not resolved the issue of the maintenance of the municipr.l code. I had considered purchasing the word processing discs containing the code from the codifiers. If this was acceptable to the codifiers, the clerical staff would be responsible for the pr •aration of all ordinance amendments and merely the clerical ma.,itenance of the code. In reviewing this proposal with Jo,— Lattin, the Office Coordinator, she advised that this a zoach would create additional demands on an already overburdened clerical staff. Jensen's letter has outlined his firm's revision service. Their fee will be based on staff time, not a "flat" fee. He stro;igly recommends an annual revision program whether we do it in house or not. T recommend that we contract with Municipal Ordinance Codifiers, Inc. for one year, providing for the first annual revision and update of our code. The City can make a more meaningful decision in the final resolution of the maintenance issue after viewing the performance and bill of the codifier.. V MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE CODIFIERS, INC. !.11��l11T! IN cN.wTT M I,l v�lION •NU OwO,N.NCI COO191C AT ON [.CI U41Y(I T WON MINNEIOTA• OOYlwNYTNT.I UNIT! Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Zoning Administrator City of Orono Box 66 Crystal B"y, MN 55323 Dear Jeanne: ,� to k'ITY OF ORONO 7400 Tyndale Avenue South Minneapolis. Minnesota 55423 Area Code 61) 869-1403 February 11, 1985 We received from your office a copy of Ordinan--e No. 9, 2nd Series, with a request that we prep• a the substitute pages for printing and insertion in your Code. We always contact a city approximately one year after the cffective date of a new Cod(--, but this called our immediate attention to maintenance of the Orono Code so I contacted City Attorney Tom Radio by phone who suggested that I call you directly, which I did last Friday. In our cor sation you said that mainter,anr of the Code was an immedi, but unresolved problem for you. You said that you had been considering requesting a price of us for the purchase of our word processing discs. You are certainly welcome to them for the current price of new discs, and no more. However, even at that price, they will, in our opinion, be of little value to you. While Code revision is frequently used by equipment- salespersons as an inducement to buy, the mechanics of printing replace ^;tt pages is the least expensive step in true Code maintenar Our firm maintains many Codes for cities all over the Stag_, we do not keep ac . ,e discs. Please permit us to review some -ters of greater importance. Our contract with the City provides for assistance with your first amending ordinances so that they can be easily inserted in the Code. We covered this with the persons present at the con- ferences but, unfortunately, they are no longer with the City. We share your concern for good maintenance. Without it the original work deteriorates and ultimately requires recodifica- tion. You have had one such experience which need not Le repeated. Your Code has been in effect less tran one yezr and we surely do not imply that it is in trouble already -- res_ assured it is not. However, we suggest that now is the time to ,Ian your maintenance program. Accordingly, we will review some options open to you. Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth -2- February 11, 1985 We should repeat our conference as to amending ordinances and procedure with the present City Attorney and anyone he chooses to bring with him. It would be scheduled in advance and held in our office. While we have already fulfilled our contractual obliga- tion as to this, under the circumstances there would be no cost or obligation on the part of the City. We know it would be helpful to you and we urge you to take advantage of our offer. In our phone conversation I mentioned the revision service offered by our firm and you asked that I outline it for you. It works like this: 1. The City adopts o-dinances just as it would without our service; 2. At the end of a twelve month period the C.ty sends us copies of all ordinances adopted during that time; 3. We examine the ordinances to make sure the integrity of the format is being maintained and we prepare a revision guide which includes (a) the adopted ordinances with any comments we may have, (b) statutes and Court decisions affecting the Code, and, (c) suggestions as to changes found workable in other communi- ties; 4. We hold a revision conference at the City Offices with the City Attorney, staff and, if possible, Council representatives; 5. We prepare revision ordinances requested at that conference for recommendation to the Council; 6. After adoption of revision ordinances we prepare amended pages for printing and insertion in the Code; and, 7. We keep records from year-to-year as to the subjects discussed and the disposition of them, which is important par- ticularly where a decision is deferred until the next conference. As I explained to you, we once tried to establish a "flat" fee for revisions which we found unworkable. Our fee is based on time and expense but since your City is in the Metro area there would be no expense charge. A one year interval is the optimum for cost effectiveness, a shorter interval has proven to be unnecessary and a longer period increases the overall expense. Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth -3- February 11, 1985 When we started the recodification we assured you that, with proper maintenance, the nee Code would last indefinitely. Whether the City chooses to develop its own system or use our service is a policy decision that should be made within one year after the effective date of the Code. Whatever decision the Council makes, we assure you that a good foundation has been laid, both in format and content, and there should be no excuse for recodification in the future. If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact us, Jeanne. Very truly yours, MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE CODIFIERS, INC. Rodger; Jensen, Counsel REJ/ag c: City Attorney Tom Radio 1rJl-f �r�i. NiEm FEB OC1985 To: Orono Council Members From: Michael P. Gaff ron, Assistant Zoni 9t+AYdO miiniWN111115r Date: February 22, 1985 Subject: Septic System Billing - Big Island As you are probably aware, the City bills each owner of a septic system the $20 On -Site Proeram Service Charge each year, in order to help fund the septic system inspection program, per Ordinance 210. The attached 2-sided flyer will be going out with the 1985 billing to update jur residents on the status of the program. Section 10.31, the RS Seasonal. Recreational District (Big Island) standards, was adopted by ordinance on December 30, 1982, and declares in part that the owners of on -site sewage treatment systems (including septic tanks, drainfields, cesspools, and outhouses) on Big Island are subject to the various provisions of Ordinance 210 including "payment of the standard annual service charge". An administrative decision was made regarding both the 1983 and 1984 billings that only the homesteaded Big Island properties would be billed pending a review of each property as to the type and e.-tent of existing systems Having now completed a review of the existing Big Island systems, we find that a total of 53 separate systems are in use on Big Island, although only 2 properties are homesteaded and only these two have historically been billed. Because the billing of 51 new charges may cause some consternation among the Big Island residents, staff felt you should review this billing. Do you feel a separate resolution authorizing and acknowledging this new billing is necessary, or are you comfortable with it as -is? A resolution will be drafted for the February 25th meeting for your review and approval as you see fit. The notice attached will be going to each new billing recipient, explaining the billing. February, 1985 Dear Orono Septic System User: As you are probably aware, the City of Orono has been inspecting individual septic systems throughout the City since 1978. The intent of the inspection program is to: l . provide information to homeowners on the proper use, operation, and maintenance of on -site septic systems; 2. catch potential problems before they damage the system or cause a health or pollution hazard --thereby saving more costly repairs; 3. identify failing systems and order repairs before health or pollution hazards spread. By correcting individual problems as they occur., we will avoid areawide problems that would require expensive municipal sewers to correct. As of Fall 1984, the majority of the approximatE-ly 1,100 existing septic systems within the City have been inspected on two or more occasions. Approximately 350 systems were inspected during 1984. In part, due to the saturated ground conditions last spring, an unusually high percentage of systems were found to be experiencing backup or surface discharge problems. Many of these were older systems located in soil or topographic conditions only minimally suitable for drainfields. Relocation of the system is often the best sclutinn for this type of problem. Remember that septic tanks are required to be pumped out at least once every three years to remove the natural accumulation of :;olids. If you use a garbage disposal, you should pump at least once each year. City staff are available to assist you with information on the proper use, operation, and maintenance of your septic system. Feel free to call us at 473- 7357 to discuss any system problems you may be experiencing. We're here to help you. In addition, an inventory card of each individual system is maintained in the City files, showing the location of your system and containing design specifications as well as a record of inspections. We are encouraged by the punitive attitude Orono residents have exhibited towards the Septic System Inspec, Program. For the most part, systems have been found in reasonably good condi , and where problems were found, homeowners have responded quickly .in making epairs. With this kind of support, we all can work together in preserving the open space character of rural Orono. Sincerely, Michael P. Gaffron Lyle Oman Assistant Zoning Administrator Septic System Inspector WHAT DOES MY INSPECTION PROGRAM FEE PAY FOR? The Inspection Program fee of $20 per year pays for the inspector and for general administration of this program without other tax dollar subsidies. The fee is charged on an annual basis to each rural homeowner using an on -site system, whether or not an actual inspection is mate that year. This simplifies accounting and thereby lowers cost. The per -inspection fee would be higher if we only billed those homes that were actually visited in a given year. The annual fee has remained at $20 and has not increased since its inception in 1979. Note that the $20 per year septic program fee is a small fraction of the $171.60 per year ($42.90 per quarter) sewer bil'. paid by Orono residents connected to municipal sewer. Think of the inspection program as insurance to avoid the high cost of municipal sewer extensions that might otherwise be forced on Orono residents by the Metropolitan waste Control Commission. The last sewer pro j_cts in Orono cost between $8, 000 and $24, 000 for each house. The $20 fee can be paid for many years before you can come close to what it would cost for sewer! SEPTIC SYSTEM MAINTENANCE TIPS PEEDING YOUR SEPTIC SYSTEM: A 'starter' i:: not needed for bacterial action to begin. Additives need not be used (additives are of little benefit, and some may do great harm if they cause the sludge and scum to be flushed out Into the drainfield). Don't deposit coffee grounds, cuoking fats, wet- atrennth towels, disposable diapers, facial tissues, cigar0tte butts, or similar non -decomposable materials into the septic tank. Avoid dumping grease down the drain as it can build up in the tank and plug the inlet. Keep a separate container for waste grease and throw it out with the trash. Use A good quality toilet tissue that breaks up easily when wet. Remove the sludge and scum in both tanks by pumping at least once every three years. GARBAGE DISPOSAL: If you must use A garbage di sposa I, you may need to remove the septic tank solids every year or more often. Ground garbage wt)' frequently find its way out of the septic tanks And clog the soil treatment system. It is better to compost or throw out garbage with the trash. CUT DOWN YOUR WATER USE: Be conservative with your use of water. Each gallon of weter used must be treated And disposed. Repair all leaky fixtures and reduce the amount of water used in IAundering, bathing, and toilet flushing. Wash only full loads in the washer and spread the washing during the week to avoid overloading the sewage system in a single day. Each bath or shover uses up to 36 gallons of water. Fi 1 ) ►ng the tub not quite so ful I and not turning the shower on all the way could save five to ten gallons with each bathing. Routinely check the toilet float valve to be sure that It isn't sticking and the water running continously. Be sure the toilet Is not flushed unneeessarlly. Don't use the toilet todispose of house cleaning water of cigoretts butts. Have the last person to wash up in the morning and evening flush the toilet After everyone else has used it. This could save 20 to 30 gallons a dAy for A fAmily of four. Water softener wastewater will not harm septic tank Action. However, the additlonAl water will need to be treated anddispased of by the soil treatment system. if the softener wastewater overloads the soil treatment system, the was can be discharged to l.he yroo.,nd surf.rce since I contains no pathogens. WINTER WEATHER: Snow cover compacted by pedestrians and anowsob►les may allow froat to penetrate to the drainfield trenches. A frozen .;r.•infield may cause• b.,ckup of sewage into the hcuse. HOW DOES MY SYSTEM WORK ? SEPTIC TANKS Raw sewage flows into the septic tank where the solids separate from the liquid. Solids such as soap scum and tat float to the top and form A scum layer. Heavier solids settle to the bottom where they are partially decomposed by bacteria. The nondecomposed solids remain as the bottom sludge layer. The solids which are trapped in the septic tank must be removed by pumping before they build up to a level where they will wash out into the soil treatment system anu plug the soil pores. The septic tank should be watertight, corrosion proof, and constructed according to standard criteria. A shallow tank with adequate access is easy to maintain, and requires only periodic inspection and pumpino of solids approximately once every two to three years. The tank cover or manhole access s6,uld be opened when the tank is pumped out so that bAffles can be checked and replaced if necessary, and so that the solids can be effectively broken up and pumped out. Inspection Pipe \ i MC 6 Inlet t 1 VC.0 tEvr, .a a 5.::�• I iL�l� 5r-► Outlet ' `Baffles --- --(i Liquid +sti�'1+ SI.JJGE I,�.t %i'1►9Y DRAIN►IELD The septic tank effluent flows into a soil treatment area commonly known as the drainfleld. This may consist of rock -lined trenches, or in some cases an elevated filter system or'sound',distributingtheliquid effluent over a lArge area. The liquid slowly evaporates and is absorbed byplont life, or filters through the soil back Into the water table. Each action cleanses the effluent of bacteria and nutrients, leaving pure water for yuur continued use. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJEt.T: CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66•Crystal Kay, Minnesota 55 230Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka NOT1 CE Big Island Froptrty Owners Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator and On - Site Program Manager February 14, 1985 On -Site Sewage Treatment System Inspection Progran, Service Charge City of Orono Ordinance No. 246, adopted by the City Council on December 30, 1982, sets forth zoning regulations pertaining to Big Island, Mahpiyata Island, and Deering Island, and constitutes Section 10.31 of the Municipal Zoning Code. Subdivision 12(.-;) of Section 10.31 sets forth standards under which on -site s;.wage treatment systems (including septic tanks/drainfields, cesspools, and outhouses) are regulated on the islands, and requires payment of the standard $20 annual on -site sewage treatment inspection program service charge, which is described in the attached flyer. Unless you have previously filed for homestead credit for your Big Island property, this is likely the first billing you have receivrc3. Sewage systems on Big Island were last inspected by the City in 1982 and are again scheduled for inspection durinc 1985. Remember that non- conforming systems must be abandoned or made conforming oy January 1, 1988. You will be notified after the 1985 inspections if any remedial action is necessary. Please feel free to contact me or Field Tnspector, Lyle Oman, at 473- 7357 if you have any questions. �l'ILUI'St: t [Utiltit� 471 7337 • ADMIMSIR %110% A I I%A,%t t 473 735b • Pt BLK HUNKS 4' l ' 159 ASSt SS1%G i FEB 2S 1985 To: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator s �►s : V OF OR"" From: Jack Brinkhaus, Street Foreman Date: February 20, 1985 Subject: Bid Award - Equipment & Materials Bids 1985 The City of Orono advertised for two successive weeks for street materials and equipment rental, with bid opening at. 10:00 A.M. Friday, February 8, 1985. The enclosed tabulation contains a complete accounting of all bids received and the recommended low bidders and alternates. The accepted low bids for materials are determined by availability and location of materials. Traveling distance to a supplier is a consideree cost factor when determinin a low bid. When renting equipment with an operator, we are guided by the type, size of equipment, and an hourly rate. It is possible to award the low bid to more than one contractor when considering materials and equipment. In order to stimulate enthusiasm for the following years work, we make sure to divide the work accordingly a*-r .g these low bidders. In the event low bidder is not available, the City reserves the right to purchase from the next alternate. This year, we received a bid from H.V. Johnston Culvert Company that was unresponsive in that they included terms that were contradictory to our specifications. Therefore, I recommend that we reject. their bid. I recommend that the City Council accept the balance of the bids as presented for the calendar year 1985. CITY OF ORONO 35 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL gUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS --EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE PIT RUN GRAVEL CLASS 4 GRAVEL CLASS 5 GRAVEL TON TON TON PIT DEL. PIT DEL. PIT DEL. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- L & D Trucking 4.83 5.40 (4) (3) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sa-Aq Inc. .92 3.85 1.92 4.85 * (1) * (2) ---------------------------------------•-- Wm Mueller & Sons ** 1.10 -------------------------------------------- 4.50 2.00 5.40 (1) (2) (1) (3) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Barton Sand & Gravel Co. 1.25 3.65 2.05 4.65 2.20 4.R0 (3) (1) (1) * (4) (1) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Buffalo Bituminous 1.25 4.75 2.00 5.50 �.15 5.65 (3) (3) * (2) (3) (5) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Midwest Asphalt Corp. 1.25 4.75 2.25 5.75 2.10 5.60 (3) (3) (3) (3) (2) (4) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bury Carlson 1.24 3.60 2.10 4.91 2.25 4.60 (2) * (2) (1) (5) * DENOTES LOW BID 1-5 ALTERNATES ** ALL PRICES SUBJECT TO .07 PER TON AGGERGATE TAX CITY OF ORONO 1985 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS i EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS--EQUIVpMT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE FA-2 CLASS C FA-3 CLASS C FA-4 REDROCK SEALCOAT SEALCOAT TON TON TON PIT DEL. PIT DEL. PIT DEL. ---------------------•------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bryan Road Products 4.25 7.25 * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------- Sa-Ag Inc. 3.50 6.40 * * ----------------------------•-----•-------------------------------------------------------------------- Wm Mueller i Sons ** 5.00 8.40 * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Barton Sand & Gravel 6.20 8.80 (1) (1) ---_-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Midwest A Ilt 4.75 8.25 (1) (1) * DENOTES LOW BID 1 ALTERNATES ** ALL PRICES SUBJECT TO .07 PER TON AGGERGATE TAX CITY OF ORONO 1985 BID TABULATIONS FVR STREET MATERIALS i EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID iN TONS --EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE FA - 1 BINDER ROCK WINTER SAND 1/:: - TO 1 1/2 TON TON PIT DEL. PIT DEL. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- L i D Trucking 5.09 ------------------- - --------------------------------------------------------------------- (4) --------- Sa-Ag Inc. .92 3.Rr 5.50 7.98 * A (2) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Wm Mueller i Sons ** 1.55 4.95 6.25 9.65 (1) (3) (4) (3) Barton Sand i Gravel 2.00 4.60 6.20 8.80 (2) (11` (3) (2) Buffalo Bituminous 4.75 10.00 (1) (4) --------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Midwest Asphalt 4.00 8.00 * (1) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bury Carlson *** 4.55 -------------------------- (1) * DENOTES LOW BID 1-4 ALTERNATES ** ALL PRICES SUBJECT TO .07 PER TON AGGEFGATE TAX * * * 200 TON MINIM!'M CITY OF ORONO 1985 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS i EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TUhc--EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE 1 1/4" CRUSHED 3/4" CRUSHED 3/4 MINUS LIMESTONE LIMESTONE LIMESTONE TON TON TON PIT DEL. PIT DEL. PIT DEL. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bryan Rock Products 3.20 6.20 3.85 6.85 3.20 6.20 • • (1) _____________________________________________________________________________________ Midwest Asphalt 3.25 6.75 3.75 7.25 3.45 6.95 (11 (1) • (1) (1I (1) • DENOTES LOW BID 1 ALTERNATE CITY OF ORONO 1985 BIB TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS i EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS --EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE MC 30, 70, 250, 800 GALLON PLANT DEL.iPLACED -------------------------------------------------- Wm Mueller a Sons +• 1.50 1.70 • (2) -------------------------------------------------- Buffalo Bituminous ••+ 1.35 Allied Blacktop --------------- Midwest Aapnalt ----------------- Bury Carlson **** __________________________ 1.45 (1) -------------------------- 1.80 (3) -------------------------- 3.00 (1) CRS - 1 6 2 GALLON PLANT DEL.iPLACED -----------------------' 1.50 1.70 e (2) 1.10 • DENOTES LOW BID 1-3 ALTERNATES •• ALL PRICES SUBJECT TO .07 PER TON AGGREGATE TAX ••• TRANSPORT LOTS ONLY •*•• MC-800 ONLY RC 250-800 GALLON PLANT DEL.sPLACED ------------------' 1.50 1.70 • (2) ------------------ 1.35 CITY OF ORONO 1985 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS L EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS --EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE 2331 MC 2341 MC TON TON -_ _ __------..---'"-"""-------------"""' PLANT DELIVERED PLACED PLANT DELIVERED PLACED Hardrives Inc. 28.00 --""--------------------""""-""-""' 32.00 (3) (3) _________________________________________________________________________________________. Wm Muller a Bons •• 19.00 22.40 19.00 22.40 _________________________________________________________________________________________. Midwest Asphalt Corp.*** 25.50 29.50 36.50 26.00 30.00 37.00 _________________________________________________________________________________________. (2) (2) (1) (2) (2) (1) Bury Carlson •••/•••• 25.25 27.75 29.00 25.50 27.75 29.00 (1) (1) • (1) (1) ' DENOTES LOW HID 1-2 ALTERNATES •• ALL PRICES SUBJECT TO .07 PER TON AGGERGATE TAX •" 350 TON MINIMUM ON PLACED BLACKTOP •••• 20 TON MINIMUM ON DELIVERED BLACKTOP Hardrives Inc. CITY OF ORONO 1985 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS i EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS--BQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE 2331 AC TON PLANT DELIVERED ------------------' 16.90 Commercial Asphalt 19.40 (3) ------------------------------ Wm Muller i Sons •• 19.00 (2) ------------------------------ Buffalo Bituminous ++++ 18.87 (1) ------------------------------ Midwest Asphalt *•• 21.00 (4) ----------------------------- Bury Carlson •++/++•++ 22.40 (5) 22.90 (1) 22.40 2341 AC TON PLACED PLANT DELIVERED PLACED ------------------------------------------ 19.20 (1) ------------------------------------------ 20.26 23.76 (3) (2) ------------------------------------------ 19.00 22.40 ---------------------------------' 24.00 27.50 19.58 24.70 28.20 (3) (1) (2) (3) (1) ----------------------------------------------------- 25.00 33.00 21.50 25.50 30.00 (4) (2) (4) (4) (2) ----------------------------------------------------- 23.61 25.66 22.65 23.61 25.66 (2) * (5) (1) + DENOTES LOW BID 1-5 ALTERNATES +• ALL PRICES SUBJECT TO .07 PER TON AGGERGATE TAX ++• 350 TON MINIMUM ON PLACED BLACKTOP ••++ 100 TPH MINIMUM ON PLACED BLACKTOP +•••• 20 TON MINIMUM ON DELIVERED BLACKTOP CITY OF ORONO 1985 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS i EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS --EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE 12" CMP 15" CMP 18" CMP 24" CMP 24" CMP 36" CMP 48" CMP 60" CMP 16 GAUGE 16 GAUGE 16 GAUGE 14 GAUGE 16 GAUGE 14 GAUGE 12 GAUGE 10 GAUGE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ALL PRICES ARE TO BE DELIVERED Viking Steel Prod. 5.54 6.51 7.54 11.92 9.77 18.36 31.10 52.80 (2) (2) (2) (1) (2) (2) (1) (1) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All Steel Products 5.50 6.50 7.50 10.00 8.50 16.00 29.00 49.00 (1) ll) Il) • a • • -------------------------------------------------- St. Regis 5.30 6.25 7.25 12.00 9.50 18.00 32.00 54.50 • + + (2) (1) (1) (2) (2) • DENOTES LOW BID 1-3 ALTERNATES CITY OF ORONO 1985 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS i EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS --EQUIPMENT IS BID PER BOURLY RATE 12" 15" 18" 24" 36" 48" 60" ------ - -------------------- APRON APRON APRON APRON APRON APRON APRON ALL PRICES TO BE DELIVERED - ----------------"""""""-"'-"'----""'-_-_-------_---__.---"-- Viking Steel Products 32.80 41.61 - 54.08 80.43 237.10 469.38 807.43 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) All Steel Products 28.00 38.00 48.00 80.00 140.00 400.00 800.00 • (1) (1) (1) • • (1) ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ St. Regis 28.50 36.50 47.00 70.00 212.50 465.00 785.00 (1) ♦ + ♦ (1) (1) .�................----...=......._...................... .......... lZ' 18. 24 3 . . 6. --------------------------------------------------------------------------"""-"'---------"'---- BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND ALL PRICES TO BE DELIVERED Viking Steal Products 5.54 6.51 7.54 9.77 18.36 46.65 79.32 (1) (1) (1) (1) + (1) (1) _________________________________.----____-____-___-__-------------_________---_--_____________ All Steel Products 6.00 7.00 8.00 10.00 20.00 35.00 65.00 (2) (2) (2) (2) (1) ______________________________________________________________________________________________ St. Regis 5.30 6.25 7.25 9.50 27.00 48.00 81.75 • • ♦ ♦ (2) (2) (2) • DENOTES LOW BID 1-2 ALTERMATEB CITY OF ORONO 1985 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS i EQUIPMENT RENTAI. ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS--BQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE BULLDOZER BULLDOZER BULLDOZER BULLDOZER BULLDOZER BULLDOZER PER HOUR PER HOUR PER HOUR PER HOUR PER HOUR PER HOUR MODEL RATE MODEL RATE MODEL RATE MODEL RATE MODEL RATE MODEL RATE ________________.--------"'----------------------------------------------' Schoening Excavating -------------- L i D Trucking Midwest Asphalt ----------------------------------- Bury Carlson •• D-313 70.00 D-6 55.00 D-7 60.00 D-6 75.00 (1) D-8 95.00 D-8H 100.00 CAT SCRAPER PER HOUR MOD,-L CY RATE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Schoening Excavating D-7 11 60.00 • DENOTES LOW BID 1 ALTERNATES •• 2 HE MINIMUM - INCLUDES PICK-UP AND DELIVERY CITY OF ORONO 1985 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS f EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS --EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE TRUCK TRUCK TRUCK TRUCK TRUCK TRUCK TRUCK PER HOUR PER HOUR PER HOUR PER HOUR PER HOUR PER HOUR PER HOUR CY RATE CY RATE CY RATE CY RATE CY RATE CY RATE CY RATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------""---------- Schosning Excavating 12 34.00 -------------------------------------------------------------------------_--_-_-___---------___--- L i D Trucking 13.9 38.00 14 39.00 • -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volkenant 6 Sons 11 35.00 • ________________________________________________________________________________..-__-_-___________ Allied Blacktop Co. 12 44.00 19 50.00 (2) __________________________________________________________________________________________________ Midwest Asphalt 12 40.00 20 55.00 (1) __________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bury Carlson 11 44.00 15 51.00 (1) • DENOTES LOW BID 1-2 ALTERNATES CITY OF ORONO 1985 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS --EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE Schoening Excavating -------------------- L i D Trucking WHEEL LOADER WHEEL LOADER WHEEL LOADER WHEEL LOADER PER HOUR PER HOUR PER HOUR PER HOUR CY RATE CY RATE CY RATE CY RATE ___________________________________________________________________________ 1 40.00 2 44.00 3 47.00 ___________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________ Volkenant 6 Sons 1 -------------------------------- Robert Innee Company 1 ------------------------------- Allied Blacktop Company 2 72.00 _____--___-�____-____ 45.00 (1) ------------------------- 40.00 2 45.00 • (- 2 45.00 (1) _______________________________ ------------------------------- _______________________________ 3 1/2 50.00 • DENOTES LOW BID 1-2 ALTERNATES (ROBERT INNER COMPANY SKID STEER LOADER W/ATTACHMENTS $35.00 PER HOUR) CITY OF ORONO 1985 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS i EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS --EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE BACEHOE BACRHOE BACRHOE BACXHOE PER HOUR PER HOUR PER HOUR PER HOUR CY RATE CY RATE CY RATE CY RATE ___________________________________________________________________-________________________--_-_--- Schoeni Excavating 1/2 48.00 3/4 58.00 ♦ e ---__--...___________________________________________________________________________________________ L i D Trucking 1/4 55.00 ♦ ____________________----______________________________________---_____--__-_--_-----__________----_._ Volkenant 6 Sons 1/3 45.00 TRAXCAVATOR TRAXCAVATOR PER HOUR PER HOUR CY RATE CY RATE Schoening Excavating 2 45.00 ♦ ________________________________ -______________----_-------__--- Volkenant & Sons 1 1/2 42.00 ♦ • DENOTES LOW BID CITY OF ORONO 1985 BID TABULATIONS FOR STREET MATERIALS i EQUIPMENT RENTAL ALL QUANTITIES ARE BID IN TONS --EQUIPMENT IS BID PER HOURLY RATE MOTORGRADER MOTORGRADER MOTORGRADER MOTORGRADER PER HOUR PER HOUR PER HOUR PER HOUR WITH WING MODEL RATE MODEL RATE MODEL RATE MODEL RATE --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Schoening Excavating 12 50.00 12 43.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Allied Blacktop Company 12E 49.00 i _____________________________________________________________________________________________..--____ Midwest Asphalt 12G 65.00 -------------------------------- Bury Carlson ------------------------------------------------------------------ 12 48.00 (1) 3/4 TON PICKUP TRUCK 6 LOWBOY W/8 PLOW PER HOUR _________________________________________________________________________________________________.___ Schoening Excavating 34.00 46.00 ------------------------------------ L i D Trucking .__________-_-_----_----_________________________________________ 45.00 60.00 (4) (2) ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Robert Innes Company 35.00 (1) --------------------------.___________________----_-----_-_---____________-___--____--_-____-____.__ Allied Blacktop Company 39.00 65.00 (2) (3) -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Midwest Asphalt 43.00 70.00 (3) (4) _ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bury Carlson 55.00 3 DENOTES LOW BID (1) 1-4 ALTERNATES C a.t.--JL blon FEB 291985 TO: City of Orono Council Q i Y 0F PR4NO FROM: Joan Lattin, Office Coordinator DATE: February 21, 1985 SUBJECT: Teri Nast's Six Month Review Teri Nash has completed her six months probationary period and I recommend that she be given a 58 salary increase effective March 5, 1985. Teri's present salary is $7.28 per hour with the 56 increase her hourly salary will be $7.65. Teri has taken the initiative to develop new methods for reports on the micro computer and is very capable in handling the busy phones and the people who have business at the City office. TO: City Council FROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director DATE: February 20, 1985 Memo x85-11 /^ page 1 of 2 4, JL .: _A A'lEE= FEB W985 Gil: v OF NOW SUBJECT: Liquor Store Operating Results - Three Months Ended December 31, 1984 Comparative liquor store operating statements for the fourth quarter of 1984 and 1983 are attached. The balance sheet and statement of revenue and expenses are somewhat condensed from prior reports but are essentially unchanged. The cost of sales statements has been expanded to show cost of sales by type, liquor, wine, beer, and mix and miscellaneous. The 1984 totals for liquor -wine and beer -mix are shown so that a comparison can be made with 1983. The more detailed information is not readily available for 1983 so this method must be used until the first quarter of 1985. A seperate schedule is included for gross profit on sales by category - liquor, wine, beer, and mix and miscellaneous. As with the cost of sales, the gross profit statement compares the 1984-83 totals for liquor -wine, and beer - mix due to information limitations. A condensed comparative statement of revenues and expenses is presented below. W.. n., of abcount• ]e.t et eno a,e•• vt.ut OpoutS.f .ae.n.a. OP.ta InV Incov (LOSS) xen eq utln9 IeCON M•t Imoae ILou) IOUIITx W6Krf b _1916 H•J (unen t11 $104.631 6116_..6S2 6p2.•21, 01190 ''�`iis 'i4'n -n U;984 itrE 1 2 565 4-4(47 F-7;LT7 t-Trial ........ ..... ........ '"1 10 011T9 1994 Ore _IfN 196) (UMKI Ifsl fflf.:u 6444.51, 6125.eW 1f�f,.1 0151 11 � I TTr s'M IITi 413 1 12{ 1 720 (123i1, i- 9! 121 ........ S 21I a ........ ITTAI ........ The fourth quarter of 1904 had income of $3,407 compared to the 1983 fourth quarter income of $7, 143, a decrease of $3,736 or 52.34. For the year 1984 net income was $9,128 on gross sales of $426,169 or 2.14%. This compares with 1983 net income of $21.203 on gross sales of $451,122, or 4.76%. For the yea• 1984 net sales were down $25,169 from 1983, a decrease of 5.62%; cost of sales was down $15,223, or 4.641; operatinc expenses were up $2,304, or 2.05%; and net income was down $12,975, or 56.95%. Memo 085-11 page 2 of 2 For the past three years sales and profits have heen declining. Sales hit a peak of $480,570 in 1981 and have declined to $426,169 in 1984, a drop of $54,491 or 11.32%. During this same period net income has declined from a 1981 high of $57,168 (an exceptional year) to $9,128 in 1984, a decrease of $48,040 or 84.03%. Operating expenses were $98,652 in 1981 and were $114,848 in 1984, on increase of $16,196 or 16.421. Inventories hive been reduced from $114,454 on 12-31-83 to $101 '58 on 12-31- 840 a decrease of $13,196, or 11.531. Credit card sales for 1984 were $27,312 or 6.41% of sales compared to 026,978 or 6.001 of sales In 1983. Generally municipal :iquor store profits have been decreasing in the state size 1981. This trend has been noted by the State Auditor in his annual recap of city liquor operations as reported in the Leayue of Minnesota Cities publication each year since 1981. I have enclosed copies of the State Auditor's recap reports for the years 1983, 1982, and 1981. M85.1 In ASSETS Current Assets: Cash and investments Returned checks and credit card charges Accounts receivable Accrued interest receivable Prepaid expenses Inventory for resa is Total Current Assests Property and equipment: Leashold improvements Equipment Less accuxilated depreciation Net Property and Equipment Total Assets CITY OF OROWO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE BALANCE. SHEEP DECEMBER 31, 1984 S 38,089 189 932 161,258 $140,468 725 25,763 26,408 (21,223) 3,265 $145,733 LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY Liabilities: Accrued Wages payable Accrued retirarent payable Accrued credit card expense Accounts payable Due to State (Sales Tax) Total Liabilities Fund Equity: Retained earnings January 1 Net income January 1 to December 31 Transfers to General Purl Total Fund Equity Total Liabilities and Fund Equity S 2,615 261 176 9,589 3,669 135,295 9,126 (15,090) DECEMBER 31, 1983 S 34,462 234 468 556 192 114,454 $150,366 725 25, 663 26,388 (19,493) 6,895 $157,261 $ 2,475 256 234 13,909 5,092 $ 16,310 $ 21,966 144,091 21,293 (30,000) 129,423 135,295 $145,733 $157,261 ........ ........ CITY OL OROMO nVNIC1VNL LIwo. $.a. 9 }614'1Y.YT OL NLVLYV[ YYo Ll ILY9L5 Three Months Ended Om 11 TY.lve Months Ended Dee Jl 6 Amount I .UYYnt 1T.� J, ... T6'e� M.OYnt CT.r Set:. rtEe ltee S196.53S 169.61 $116.611 le9.99 $426,169 169.0 3451r113 199.19 341.6 discounts y y� Met.ee i 1il]i �,�.,n 11Wit. -16-W 41'518y -11-a -T>l Co., of silo bin t. 6�i 19� yil9 264 lmi 116IIY DTose Protle 16 1)5 i ]f is¢ )29, IY1 nm Opeueetu sebsl.s t.dnd me9me 16,659 11.56 II.]SS 11.31 66.U9 I1.63 61.391 ConttlYutlone LI66 1.95 1.661 l.11 E.661 1.09 5./16 1.11 1.13 health & l Inaun.. N.du f Ir lid 1.11 139 .13 4.661 1.11 41186 .11 Mo[t... ." insU[.nu Ilf .11 IH .l] 609 .10 5IS .11 Pmbulonel sosvn,et ...I 1,66S .)6 639 .il tin, tool wlplles 353 I1 131 .09 .00 11111 .94 MOp eet. d plo Mot, Iltht end Part .06 ills?36 .11 4.I65 1.i11 I.e9 41684 439 6I] .61 Ili .li .SI 511 .13 .21 Sent, Wildi nO ). 159 ).63 1, 61I I.11 4,911 11.911 3.l0 11.611 J.15 ..nt. .....I Md nt.men...nd [.Peen 636 .49 601 .li I,NI .49 1.119 .51 hddn. CM[9. f[et Gen. land .S9 11l .19 1.1u .16 ). 695 .1% Cffics, utlone Ill ILI .11 SSS .D 61S .05 PI .06 Oltlo. ]I J] II .12 231 .95 316 .61 g, pubes n9. luellshln9 6 tdmertleln9 Ill .li .A 1.211 .)1 1,516 .11 Data Pt Ill .H $16 I11 .16 I.111 .61 .66 Co. Intu[.nws 1... 151 .13 1.115 1.59 1,763 .66 4.1t1 6.616 1.44 OtMo[ uponu 181 .A 115 .59 I, 113 A6 I,tll .0 Total OP.[atin9 1NP.nse -3y -T(--ff -fTA 11� -dil.iS y -74--.W 0"..tl.9 Inoo.. (Loo1 2,69S 3.36 4.511 6.56 S.613 1.27 17,481 1.9. Mon 0".tim tr..nme: Intotest on Investments 956 .91 56S .61 ).14, .01 Loss .67 .the, U V4 - - 119 96 ass _ S Totnl MD. wlnusll M85.lIc CITY OF ORONO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE GROSS PROFIT ON SALES Three Months Ended Dec 31 Twelve Months Ended Dec 31 1984 1983 1984 1983 Liquor Sales S 42,560 $153,595 Cost of Sales 30,503 111,600 Gross Profit S 12,057 $ 42,505 Gross Profit 8 28.33% 27.69% Wine Sales S 30,770 $106,183 Cost of Sales 20,233 69,168 Gross Profit 1 ,537 37,015 Gross Profit t 34.24% 34.861 Total Liquor and Wine Sales S 73,330 $ 80,765 $259,688 $271,997 Cost of Sales 50 736 26 180,168 18 Gross Profit S t� 611 0 $ ea 709 Gross Profit 4 30.81% 32.95% 30.62% 31.14% Beer Sales S 31,017 $155,065 Cost of Sales 21,648 .110 337 Gross Profit 919 S 44,728 Gross Profit S 30.21% 28.84% Mix and Miscellaneous Sales $ 2,178 S 11,416 Cost of Sales 1,912 8,915 Grose Profit T---Fa $ 2,501 Gross Profit t 12.21% 21.91% Total Beer, Mix and Miscellaneous Sal -es $ 33,195 $ 37,658 $166,481 $179,125 Cost of Sales 23,560 27 035 119,252 127 194 Gross Profits , 623 7, 29 51, 31 Gross Profit 8 29.03% 28.21% 28.37% 28.62% M85.11O CITY OF ORONO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE COST OF SALES Three Months Ended Dec 31 Twelve Months Ended Dec 31 1984 1983 1984 1993- Liquor Inventory, Beginning S 49,448 S 52,886 Purchases 27,065 104,124 76,513 157,010 Less Inventory, Ending 46,910 46,010 Cost of Sales 39,503 $111,000 Wine Inventory, Beginning S 51,809 $ 54,942 Purchases 17,669 63,471 69,478 118,413 Less Inventory, Ending 49,245 49,245 Cost of Sales 20,233 $ 69,168 Total Liquor and Wine Inventory, Beginning $101,257 $ 89,309 $107,818 $102,614 Purchases 44,734 72,673 167,5 192,502 145,991 161,982 275,4 295,116 Less Inventory, Ending 95,255 107,828 95,2•_ 107,828 Cost of Sales S 50,736 S 54,154 $180,16t $187,288 Beer Inventory, Beginning S 3,664 $ 4,667 Purchases 22,071 109,757 25,735 114,424 Less Inventory, Ending 4,087 4,087 Cost of Sales $ 21,648 $110,337 Mix and Miscellaneous Inventory, Beginning $ 11988 S 1,960 Purchases 1,640 8 871 NEW 3,828 Less Inventory, Ending 1,916 1 916 Cost of Sales 1,912 8,915 Total Beet, Mix and Miscellaneous inventory, Beginning $ 5,652 $ 6,553 $ 6,627 $ 6,797 Purchases 23,911 27 169 118,628 127,024 133,821 29,563 3� 125,255 Lass Inventory, Ending �.�.6t0.0.33 6,627 6,903 6 627 Cost of Sales 5 23,s6s �m ,194 Analysis of city liquor store operations for 1983 Ame H. Carlson, State Auditor Declining sales and net income con. tinued in 1993, as evident in the sum. mary analysis of city liquor store oper. ations. In the 343 cities which operated liquor stores, 60 stores suffered oper- ating liquor losses, while 31 stores had net losses. In contrast, 22 stores con tributed $100.000 or more to the city general fund, which indicates the sharp contrasts in profit among the stores. Four stores closed during the year. City liquor store sales decreased $833.000 to $138.5 million in 1993. compared to $139.3 million in 1982: and $146.1 million in 1981. Gross profit for a8 stores of 31.5 percent was up 0.1 percent over the prior rest. Oper. ating expense continued rising to 25.7 percent, up from 25.2 percent in 1982. Operating income of $8.0 million was down from S8.6 million 1982 and $10.6 million in 1981. Net 'income of a8 stores totaled $10.854.071. down from $11.408.194 a year earlier. Contribution of city liquor store profits to other city funds was down also in 1983. amounting to S8,884,704 compared to $9.079,436 for 1982. Twenty-seven city liquor stores had gross sales in 196 in excess of $1 million, and two. Edda and Richfield. had sales of $5.48 and $5.46 million. resper. uvely. The most profitable city liquor store was Richfield with an operating income of $463.623. followed by SI. Anthony. Bemidji, and Edina. Twemy- six stores had net icomes of over $100.000 in I"0r, as compared to 24 atoms III 19t income for all stores ($10,851,G' an average of 7.8 percent of ., cotnpared to 8.2 per - mot in 1982.. d 9.6 percent in 1901. Nimly-eight stores made no corn butions to other municipal funds in 1983 and nine required contributions from governmental funds. Two stores. Longville and Wilson. faded In report in lime for this nock December 1984 Summary of 1983 city liquor stores operations On and Off sale stores - 248 cities Pervert of sales Item Amount 1983 1982 Saks $75.932.166 1011.0 100.0 Cost of Saks 46.234.036 61.0 61.9 Gross profit 29.598,130 39.0 38.1 Operating expense 25.392.613 33.5 32.3 Income from operatbns 4,205.517 55 5.8 Non-operatin8 revenues 2.157.561 2.8 2.8 Non -operating expenses 353.990 0.4 0.4 Net income before transfers 6.9i19.088 7.9 8.2 TraiM,,s to other atv funds 4.573.410 - - Of -sale only stores - 95 cities Percent of ad. It.. Amount 1983 1982 Saks $62.625.435 100.0 100.0 Cost of asks 48.590.811 77.6 77.7 Grass profit 14.11M.624 22.4 ?2.3 Operatog expensv 10.194.221 16.3 15.6 Income from operations 3.842.403 6.1 6.7 Non -operating revenues 1.212.146 1.9 1.8 Non -operating expenses 209.566 0.3 0.3 Net income before transfers 4.844.983 7.7 8.2 Transfers to other an' funds :.311.294 - - All stores - 343 cities Percent of sal. Item Amount 1983 1982 Saks $138.457.601 100.0 100.0 Cost al saes 91,822,&7 68.5 68.6 Gross profit 43,634.754 31.5 31.4 Operating expense 35.586.874 25.7 25.2 Income from operauans 8.047,920 5.8 5.2 Non operating revenues 3.369.707 24 2.3 Nonopera uq; expenses 563.556 0.4 0.3 Net .. before transfers 10.851,071 7 8 8.2 Transfers to other city funds 8.884.704 - - Operating income as a percent of sales Percent of agile+ Item 1993 1982 1981 On and off Bair stores 5.5 5.8 7.2 Off -sale my stores 6 1 6.7 7.4 AN stores 5 N 6 2 7.3 Analysis of city liquor store operations for 1982 State auditor Decreasing sal, and drdimng net income are evident in the summary analysis of o(y liquor store operations in 1982. In the 348 cities which oper- ated,liquor stores, 44 stores suffered operating losses, while 26 stores had net losses. Seven stores closed during the year. In contrast, 18 stores contnb uted $100,000 or more to the city general fund. which indicates the sharp contrasts in profit among the stores. City liquor store sales decreased $6.8 ndOlon to $139,291,307 in 1982. compared to 1981 sales of $146.152.224. Cost of sales declined slightly from 68.8 percent an 1981 to 68.6 in 1982. Gross profit for all stores increased to 31.4 percent in 1982. up from 31.2 percent in 1981. Operating expense continued to rise to 25.2 per cent as compared to 23.9 percent in 1981. and 23.4 percent in 1980. Open acing income of $8.605,815 Is down from $10.618.860 to 198). Net income of all stores totaled $11,408.184, down sharply from $13.971.092 a year earlier. Contribu. tion of city liquor store profits to other city funds was down slightlyin 1982. amounting to $9,079,436 compared to $9.586,768 for 1981, Twenty -fire city liquor stmes had gross sales in 1982 in excess of $1 million and two. Edina and Richfield. had sales of $5.7 million and $5.5 million, respectively. The most prufita ble city liquor store was Richfield with an operating income of $442.410 fob lowed by St. Anthony and Edina. Twenty-four stores had net wows of over $100.000 in 1982, as cu"wed to 30 stores in 1981. Net income for all stores was $11.408,i84. an average 8 2 percent of sales, compared to 9.6 percent b, 1981. SevenlY,ighl stores made no moon. bulions to other muns-Ipal funds to 1982 and 13 required cornributxrnx fnsn so, - emmrntd fund, NOrerrrber 1983 Summary of 1982 city liquor stores operations On and off -sale stores - 258 cities Percent of sales Item Amount 1992 1981 Sales 90.355.740 100.0 100.0 Cost of sales 49,701.888 61.9 62.5 Gross profit 30,653,852 39.1 37.5 Operating expense 25.978.078 32.3 30.3 Income from operations 4.675,774 5.8 7.2 Nonoperating revenues 2.216.840 2.8 3.3 Nonoperaung expenses 334.947 0.4 0.4 Net income 6.557.667 8.2 10.1 Transfers to other city funds 5.296.846 -- -- Off-sale only stores: 90 cities p /b� ercent of sales Item Amount 01982 1981 Sales S58,935,567 100.0 100.0 Cost of sales 45,799.055 42 % 77.7 78.0 Gross profit 13.136.512 30.3 22.3 22.0 Operating expense 9.206.471 oy, 3 15.6 14.6 Income from operations 3.930,041 (e.p 6.7 7.4 Nonoperating revenues 1.072.305 /.S 1.8 1.6 Nonopenting expenses 151.829 - 0.3 0.2 Net income 4850,517 -7, S 8.2 8.8 Transfers to other sty funds 3:782.590 -- All stores: 348 cities Percent of sales Item Amosmt 1992 1981 Sales $139.291.307 100.0 100.0 Cost of sales 95.500.943 68.6 68.6 Gross profit 43,790.364 31.4 31.2 Operating expense 35.184.549 25.2 Z4.9 Income from operations 8.605,815 6.2 7.3 Nonoperatmg revenues 3,209.145 2.3 2.7 Nonopentmg expenses 486.776 0.3 0.4 Net income 11,408.184 8.2 9.6 Transfers to other cav foods 9,079.436 -- -- Operating income as a percent of sties Percent of Wee Item 1982 1981 1980 On and off sA, sore, 5.8 7.2 8.3 Off sal, oNr sorr, 6 7 7 4 8.0 All storr, 6 2 7.3 82 17 Analysis of Municipal Liquor Store Operations for 1981 ARNE H. CARLSON, Stale Auditor There were 359 cities in Minnesota operating ON AND Off SALE STORES 772 MUNICIPALITIES - municipal liquor stores during 1981. Two hundred and Percent seventy-two were on and off -sale stores, while 87 were Item Amount of Saks off -sale only. Sales .....$86,769,197 100.0 Cost of Sales .............. 54,223,709 62.5 Gross Profit $32,545,488 37.5 Municipal liquor store sales totaled $146.152.224 in O..... Operating Expense .. .. 26,319, 715 30.3 1981 as compared to 1980 Sales of $140,869,427. an in- Income from crease of $5.3 million. Cost of Sales rose from 68.4 per- Operations -$2,921,057 cent to 68.8 percent in 1981. Operating expense e Non operating Revenues 2, 3.2 amounted to 23.9 percent of Sales, as compared to 23.4 Non -operating Expenses 381.356 0.4 0.1 percent in 1980. Operating income of $10.618.11W. or Net Income ..... 761,474 .$8.765,474 10.1 7.3 percent of Sales, was down $896,538 when com- o Other Contributions to Other L pared to the preceding year. Municipal funds Municipal F 85,914,511 - 6 Contributions of municipal liquor store profits To ei n other municipal funds was up in 1981, amounting to OEbsAtf ONLY STORES 37 MLwIaPAUSLES v S9,586,768 as compared to $8,774,721 in 1980. Twenty Percent stores showed contributions to the city governmental Item Amount of Saks funds of $700,000 or more in 1981, while 73 stores made Sales - $59.383,027 100.0 no contribution in 1981 and 14 required contributions Cost or Sales 46,323,646 78.0 from governmental funds. Gross Profit ... $13,059.381 22.0 Operating Expense 8,666.294 14.6 Twenty-seven municipal liquor stores had gross Sales Income from in 1981 in excess of $1 million and two -Edina and Operations $4.393.087 7.4 Richfield -had sales of $6.1 million and $5.6 million, Non -operating Revenues .9b1,565 1.6 respectively. The most profitable municipal liquor store Non -operating Expenses 149,034 0.2 was St. Anthony with an operating income of $399.487. Net Income . S5,205.618 8.8 followed by Edina and Richfield. Thirty stores had net in Contributions to Other comes of over $100.000 in 1961. Net income for all Municipal Funds _ $3,672.257 - - stores amounted to $13.971,092, an average of 9.6 Pet - sr cent of sales. Comparative operating income results for all store, pd PP g ALL STORES 359 MUNICIPALITIES as a Percentof sales are presented below. Percent Percent of Saks Item Amount of Saks 1981 1960 Sales $146.152,224 100.0 On and Off -sale Stores 7.2 83 Cost of Sales 100,547,355 68.8 S Off -sale Only Stores 7A 8.0 Gross Prafil $45,604,869 31.2 w All Stores . ....... 7.3 82 Operating Expense 34.986,009 23.9 Income from Operations ..$10,618.860 7.3 Thnty-seven municipal liquor stores suffered Non -operating Revenues .... .. 3,882,622 2.7 operating losses in 1981, while 16 stores had nel losses. Non -operating Expenses .. 530,390 0.4 Eleven stores were closed during 1981. A summary slate Net Income - S13,971.092 9.6 Trent of 1981 municipal liquor store operations is Contributions to Other presented in The next column. Municipal Funds _$9.586.768 - MINNESOIACITIES [ POPHAM. HAIK, SCHNOBRICH, KAUFMAN 6 DOTV. LTD. +a++ ioa c[.rca M INNEAPOLI3. MINNESOT : 55402 ,[61i-aaa- a.. n•ccow.....cut . c1 c coe o. w .Duc .'su+o. .m..n o rA.-L mo.Ae c �u w.c[ e.. us • 6 [v[.. «ca L[fu[ac r«o.•. c ..¢uwwwe[. .Ic.Acc . MILAN .ow[.+... "AN 1^1.cu A. "Arc woecw. c au+uso. .A[ •ITuo» I.— . . oe eoa., [.Owa�fO« .••.[c[....MAN" . c.co . .eoruary 20, 1985 Mr. John Gerhardson City of Urono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 He: Willow Drive Resolution Dear John: FEB 201985 yt . r OF Me. cow Av+o-.cwn I.E. OEM It .<w..I ... 60802 o... u...... c .... [Doo . a•w[n, A . ww5.l.010.. O. c, 20036 . j. LB 2 1 '985 I 11,1CITY OF URUfyO� Enclosed please find the proposed resolution for the speed limit variance along a portion of Willow Drive. It includes the nold harmless language the Department of Transportation requires. Please put this on the dgenda for the February 25, 1985 Council meeting. TJR/3f Enclosure 5312E Ve/ry/ truly yours, Thomas J: Radio City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY NO. OF •-• • A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY OF ORONO SETTING A SPEED LIMIT OF 30 MPH ALONG WILLOW DRIVE FROM FOX STREET TO THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD BRIDGE AND INDEMNIFYING THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FROM ANY CLAIMS AS A RESULT OF SETTING SUCH SPEED LIMIT WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has approved and granted to the City, a variance from Minnesota Rules §8820.3300 allowing a vehicle speed limit of 30 mph on Willow Drive, from Fox Street to the Burlington Northern Railroad Bridge; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono: 1. The vehicle speed limit along Willow Drive from Fox Street to the Burlington Northern Railroad Bridge shall be set at 30 miles per hour, rather than 40 miles per hour as stated in Minnesota Rules #8820.3300. 2. As a condition of MnDOT granting its variance, the City will hold harmless the State of Minnesota and all its agents and employees of and from any and all claims, demands, actions or causes of actions of any nature or character arising out of or by reason of, in any manner, the resurfacing project on MSAS 191 (Willow Drive) from Fox Street to B.N.R.R. Bridge, in any other manner than as a design speed of 40 miles per hour in accordance with the Minnesota Rules ,$8820.3300, and further agrees to defend at their sole cost and expense any action or proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising as a result of the variance. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, of a regular meeting held February 25, 1985. Mary C. Butler, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Cleik INTEROFFICE MEMO 85-027 4,A kuE= DATE: February 21, 1985 FEB 25-1985 TO: Mayor Butler, Orono City Council OF ORM FROM: Chief of Police Melvin Kilbo SUBJECT: Public Auction The Police Department requests to conduct a public auction on March 23, 1985 at 10 a.m. at Martin's 66 Station in Navarre. The vehicles to be auctioned have been abandoned, seized, or unclaimed. This auction will be to satisfy tow and storage charges, and will be conducted in accordance with Orono ordinance #178, Opt. 112. The following vehicles will be sold to the highest bidder with payment in cash or check with all sales final. MN MMM117 1973 Ford Station Wagon, Ser. #3P76S137484 MN AGA625 1971 Chev. 2-door, Ser. P166471JI87793 MN BUY133 1968 Ford 2 dr. HT, Se-. 08P62F180748 MN EYX835 1970 Plym. 2-door, Ser. OPL21LOD226294 MN OCK519 1973 Ford Ste. Wagon, Ser #(unavailable/unknown) MN DUR190 1971 Malibu, Ser. 413637IL175180 MN MLN396 1979 Chev. Cpe., Ser. #lM07V9249567 MS MC20272 Vepa Motor Bike, Ser. #(unavailable/unknown) SoJL. !!—A hItE r6 FEB 2S 1985 TO: City Council tSflW1 FROM: Joan Lattin, Assistant Finance Director Wi:� OrrCry'f!M DATE: February 22, 1985 SUBJECT: Wine Sales in Grocery Stores Mel Kilbo, Chief of Police will be at the Council meeting on Monday, February 25, 1985, and he will address the matter of wine in the grocery stores. As I stated in my last memo the 1 iquor managers and my concern is the impact that the sale of wine in the grocery store will have on the profits of the liquor store. I have attached a copy of my memo of 2/7/85 also attached is a fact sheet from the Municipal Liquor Store Association. 9I1.BUYi,11O1R P®.. - 11....Y. - lAtiVH9 ..10. T.T. SMM LAM l0[SOK9/ G618016 it `st56" t il. IPBieITI IOAI. tU01. .HO'L 9001. Im L B01I0 001 , rim NIX 40M0 MYS eO®nIa 6NN8 9mbm O/21/26 It 9 St 812,951.0 6 119.M $18,177-81 S IM.M S19.M6.A 0 1,41011.01 5 66.20 5 A.11 0 2.64 6 1.211.16 xs�M ll/ltnl 7M It 21,108,11 223.811 22.612.45 h1SO] .57i Y).)t6.9S 959.A 66.15 61.51 9).9 1.10.0 6 yn St 161 161.)) BM6 0/16/29 5 as It 22, M.❑ 221.0 22,612.45 6A.A 21,296.91 M.26 A. VS O.61 Ad I,M1.0 Stun 10/IiM 8 M 5t 22,00.11 223.86 22,612.45 1.110.M 23d62.65 I'M." 57.52 MAIL 110.911 1.618.44 9 St 24.936.41 249. 16 25, LOS.19 1.259.29 26.665.811 1.500AS M.12 10.M 169.61, 1.M.11 v'[e6ery 09/29M M M 19,261.86 192.60 -9,460.54 1,15I.R 21,111.99 1.916.:1 62.61 111.0 101.49 2.m." Mrvo 93AIM 16 y:6 6 It 21.665.11 216.65 21.961.36 717.0 26.618.60 951.69 66.51 67.a WON, 1.116.A SeiN OSRBM y[6 puuc 03/16AI 1 Y'e - 23.66686 216.45 23.811J1 - - - 26.42.0 N0.62 11.92 56.26 65.4141 911.M t y[0 It Id 561.i1S eobnen 23/I8/91 1 n - 16,931.86 169.SO 17,1O1.24 - - 11,II7.26 161E 1.28 it." Qwe.8r69 II/UM 9 y[6 51 U,M1.21 10.01 I1.111.28 6S6.S6 11,181.86 186.P )).61 55.95 12.86 MO.H �6n 06q3/8 - - - 16.226.311 162.26 16.186.241 - - 16,1M.29 162.26 6.911 11.44 S." IBS.M ......... 4, W.-a .... Sl-f.6}T.9 .......... i651.T6 ....... >Fbi.2l ....... ....... itl,6irR ......... IMFNW[SOQ PMOI•BM. - MC fO� - lY9 fOBiellf tW06 �8610- (01 16.s lbntl� Im 1s no6)Is xW16.Y MW it 'RII'6L COAL IC1 9.5 p2yep 5 6.62 S .04 S 1.46 - . S 6.46 Butlan 1.00 .M 7.0 -- 1.88 y��ln9 6.69 .e 6.% - - 6.55 wol 6.84 .25 CIS - - 6.0 N6Minq 6.52 .05 4.57 - - ).Sl (ppMpMM X . W, On,9l Al1YFV15 f9666Y1' 1, ,onu. 59 ,oeu. ,m'L „'m �2 BIY..9 991w rIa 1ue mir, xellln 621,236.52 8212.55 621,661.0 81,693.35 SM.W.82 SI.MS.M $ S9.M 8 M.M 8 3.12 SIAM.q 6MIn 33,M2.61 334.93 33,736.n 1,W.88 n.623.51 I,BM.p 65.M 162.0 S.M 2.1M.23 Ottln ZI,256.52 212.S5 21,K1.0 1.833.M n.W.62 I,MS.M M.M M." 3.12 11e M. 13 w tx 31,762.21 311.62 32,819.83 I,M3.99 13,M..82 1.921.61 $1.67 In.91 M.M 2. IM.n G[tuc.l6an 15,S33.62 15S.33 35,6M.n 1. M.99 31,M3.19 2,149.n 91.37 ISI.% SS.M 2,8M.Y 6[1M1M99 M,3M.16 282.91 n,513.61 I.M.M M,M3.35 1,311.59 n.19 I0.61 1M.M 2.n3.0 C.,l. n,838.79 n6.31 28,311.95 1.615.55 M,1M.M 1,69S.K In.n - - 95.% I.9M.99 Bllw M,261.21 M2.41 M,623.62 11911.18 M,SS4.M 211I3.M n1.0 - - In.12 2.1M.M 8u[miitt[ 36.925.23 1M.n 31,234.58 1.M1J2 12.196.M') M,181.21 L1M.li 2MJ1 - - ILL" 2,n6.J3 x9Ldry I.MB.M 13.M .;:: 66 K.61 I, M).53) St<ffevft a n,619. 19 2". 19 25.M9.M I,M3.68 M,559.M 1,514.87 WA 1M.M M.n 1.70.31 ��iwen 21,3n. 18 211.n 23.612.S7 1,189.61 n,993.M 1,6%.62 133.67 - - n.M 1.659.M x iglu ISAS9.69 151.59 15J11.M 765.55 16,en.63 912.18 M.M U." 16.M 1,9M.38 Gff[m Min." n1.21 M.301.M 1J19.M 21,M6.93 116M.M V.I6 111.61 0.0 I, M.3s Clb�rltll n.586.M n5.63 n,8/2.33 1,492.12 31,3M.69 32,W. 18 I,M3.M W.M - - 10.97 2.N).M xol lCiy I,251.M 12.M I.M2.56 63-I3 1,325.691 83,999.59 819.9M.11 823,BM.M 61.6M.K 51.613.M 5819.49 $r.4U.83 TO: Orono C. Council FROM: Joan Lattin, Assistant Finance Director DATE: February 7, 1985 SUBJECT: Wine In Grocery Stores Resolution Fca 1 i �sa5 I have attached a resolution opposing Wire In Grocery Store Legislation. Should the Minnesota Legislature pass legislation allowing wine in the grocery stores it could erode the profits of both municipal and private off -sale stores. The wine sales represent 25% of the total gross sales at the Orono store and the margin of profit on wine is 35%, whereas liquor is 27% and beer 26%. The sale of wine 'n the grocery stores would reduce the net profit of the Orono Liquor Store. WINE -IN -GROCERY STORES ---- FACT SHEET 1. MINNESOTA'S EXCLUSIVE LIQUOR STORES ARE DOING AN EXCELLENT JOB OF MARKETING WINE RESPONSIBLY: A. Extremely Broad Selection --- Competitive Pricing --- Warm Atmosphere --- Attractive Wine Department Fixturing --- Large Percentage of Overall Floor Space Devoted to Wine; B. Helpful, Professionally Trained Sales Assistance; C. A High Percentage of Store Personnel are Women which accounts for a typical Customer Count of Over 60% Women; and D. Exclusive Liquor Stores DO NOT WANT TO GO INTO THE CHEESE OR GROCERY BUSINESS. 2. MINE (like beer, s its 8 cordials IS AN ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE THAT MUST BE TAXED, 0 R1 oll�D 6 �€ u Ii T€6 rrx€-AAu L i SEV€k7(( A. The issue is not whether wine is a food but whether wine is an alcoholic beverage; 1) Wine has no more food value than beer or spirits or cordials; 2) Medically, all beverage alcohol is viewed as providing only "empty calories" 3) Beverage alcohol is not a substitute, nor efficient source of food; B. Wine is taxed, both federally and locally as beverage alcohol, not food; and C. Wine sales are controlled by the Alcohol Control Boards in all 50 states. 3. LIQUOR CONTROL POLICIES ARE BEST DETERMINED AT A STATE-WIDE LEVEL: State government is far better prepared than local city councils to gather and evaluate all the facts necessary to consider the consequences of liquor control policy; So -Called "local option" does not work; 1) Local option has failed in Sunday opening; 2 Local option has become "local blackmail" in 10:00 P.M. Friday Closings; 3 Local option does not work in competitive community and suburban situations; 4 Wine is not the proper weapon for contiguous border wars; 5 Local option has been a hideous failure in Chicago; 6) Wine alcohol control policy is not a fitting subject for intense political pressure on local governments where many a councilmember tan be a grocer, liquor dealer etc. 4. GROCERY WINE SALES ARE INHERENTLY MORE DIFFICULT TO CONTROL THAN EXCLUSIVE LIQUOR STOREWISALES. A. Package liquor stores are almost always, one -owner -operated businesses where the force of the liquor control coawissions can be overwhelming; B. Grocery stores are often highly organized as large chains where the threat of closing a single store for illegal wines sales has a minimal threat on overall operations, C. Grocers are structured with strong ties between Producers, Wholesalers, and Retailers --- many of which relationships are illegal in the carefully controlled Three -Tier System of liquor control; D. Minnesota's Liquor Control Commission lacks the budget and manpower to handle a potential 300% increase is outlets for wine -- especially for outlets not experienced with the special problems of selling alcoholic beverages. 5. EXTENDING THE NINE SELLING PRIVILEDGE TO MINNESOTA GROCERY STORES COULD HAVE CONSEQUENCESSEVERE NE A. When grocery stores are allowed to sell wine, shocking wine consumption increases occur overnight. These increases range from a low of 41% to a high of 718% with an average of over 300% in studies conducted in seven states; B. Wine consumption increases are uniquely dangerous; 1) States dominated by wine consumption preferences have the highest rates of overall alcohol consumption in the United States; 2) States dominated by wine consumption preference have the highest rates of Liver Cirrhosis in the United States; 3) When the percentage of the alcohol consuming population broadens, the pro Portions of alcoholics and abusive drinkers broaden accordingly; 4) Foreign countries where wine is treated like a mere food, like Frar and Italy, have the highest rates of alcoholism and liver cirrhosi in the world; 5) Studies clearly show that when beer nr spirits are the dominant alcoholic beverage within a state, rates of alcoholism and liver cirrhosis are surprisingly low. 6) High correlations exhist in many wine -in -grocery states between increased wine sales and Property Damage, Injury Producing Accidents, 3 Felony Drunk Driving Arrests; C. Grocery stores have a poor record of underage sales to minors. Studies from coast to coast reveal that grocers range from 50% to 900% more likely to make underage beverage alcohol sales than exclusive liquor dealers: D. Many wine -in -grocery stores states rank as the worst states on the Alcohol Problems Index which calculates per capita consumption, alcoholism, alcohol -related crimes, alcohol death Dublic drunkenness and drunk driving. A. One study shows a 25% gross sales drop to package liquor stores when wine was introduced irco grocery stores; B. Where grocery stores can sell wine, wine industry studies show that grocers average nearly 70% of all wine sales in the marketplace; C. Municipal liquor stores (unique to Minnesota in any real numbers) would e harmed, both reducing tax revenues and control. D. Consumers would be harmed since grocery stores rarely carry boutique wines, resulting in liquor stores being stuck with slower moving, imported wines which means much higher prices. Exclusive liquor stores would also sharply reduce wine selection. One study projects a first year minimum decrease of 30% of facings and a minimum price increase of 20%. 7. DANGERS BEYOND THE FIRST YEAR OF WINE IN GROCERY STORES: A. Nine sales could be extended to Gas Station Superettes; B. Grocery stores could easily push for strong beer as well; C. Only four states with wine -in -grocery stores have resisted the pressure to put Spirits in grocery stores D. The grocery industry preference for Price Advertising would erode the last bastion of control, TO: City Council FROM: John R. Gerhardson Mel Kilbo Tom Kuehn Joan Lattin Jean Mabusth Lorraine McGowan DATE: February 15, 1985 FES 251985 OF opggo SUBJECT: Salary and Benefit Review Non -Bargaining Unit Employees The following non -bargaining unit employees salary and benefit review is being presented to you because of concerns by the department heads regarding benefits and salary adjustments and how they differ from bargaining unit employees benefits and salary adjustment. The items of concern are: Injured on duty pay Vacation days Longevity pay 1985 salary adjustments Holidays The injured on duty pay, vacation days and number of holidays are items that are being reviewed by Mr. Cy Smythe while updating the personnel policy. The 1985 salary adjustments and longevity pay are of immediate concern and we are requesting action on those items as soon as possible. The longevity pay was approved in November 1984 for the police officers retroactive to January 1, 1984. It is our opinion that all employees that are not supervisors receive longevity pay retroactive to January 1, 1985. The cost of living increase for non -bargaining unit employees was 4%. The cost of living increase for bargaining unit employees was 5►. It is our opinion that a 14 increase be passed on to all non-bargining unit employees retroactive to January 1, 1985. It is an accepted policy that supervisory personnel do not receive longevity pay, therefore we are recommending a 5% increase for all non -bargaining unit supervisory personnel retroactive to Janaury 1, 1985. The dollar amount impact on the above recommendations amounts to $40,000.90. page 2 February 15, 1985 Salary and Benefit Review Non -Bargaining Unit Employees Please be advised that this is an interim adjustment and as soon as further studys are completed we will present that information to you with further recommendations. All department heads will be in attendance at the Council meeting on February 25th to discuss this, with the exception of the Liquor Store Manager, who is on vacation. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION OPPOSING THE WINE IN GROCERY STORES LEGISLATION WHEREAS, the City of Orono owns and operates a Municipal Off Sale Liquor Store, WHEREAS, the City of Orono has transferred the profits from the Liquor Store to reduce the General Property Tax levy, WHEREAS, should the Win^ in Grocery Stores legislation be passed, the profits of the Liquor Store wou:d ba reduced. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Orono Council opposes any legislation allowing wine in :grocery stores. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held February 25, 1985. ATTEST: Dorothy Y,tlallin City rl?cR Execu4ive %0!0 d iseuss�d r,� .2 0aS-sS MP.d:�n9 aft now �iea ti) e w 4VI F BPS Cheek lui4l -b 11WOND/ Ci►y�Gvk as i chose dOtUMe, A+S - No+ pubs Ic, laorMafien LIST OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR MEETING OF February 25, 1985 Raffle License: Multiple Sclerosis Kennel License: Irwin Jacobs, 1700 Shoreline Drive Duane W. 6 Pamela G. Anderson 4220 Chippewa Lane John Merrill Lanier Sr. 3060 Fox Street INTEROFFICE MEMO 85-025 DATE: February 19, 1985 TO: Mayor Butler, Orono City Council FROM: Chief Melvin Kilbo SUBJECT: Raffle License - Multiple Sclerosis I have reviewed the raffle license application attached. I understand the M.S. Society will be running the raffle in numerous bars and taverns in the metro area and that they will be in charge. I have some reservations about gambling in a licensed liquor establishment, but I approve this license if thev, (the M.S. Society) are running it. I have reviewed the application and they do meet all the necessary criteria to meet the city ordinances. NrLOMI Mu4�pH $CINO.n $O[IpY MmMwM N."E Sbr rMplb 2N4 N Wft. Awn. MinM.pdn. µnM.W. SS.M Telephone (6121 870-1500 Toll -Free i-NO.592-5296 WIN -WIN RELATIONSHIPS CHARITABLE GAMING KATHLEEN MAHONEY M.Auine R..... .n... I.. Willard M. Munger, Jr. E....nu Di,..,., License No. APPLICATION FOR RAFFLE LICENSE - $10.00 fee Organization Address: Representative: Affiliation with Address: -V 3 V4 Date(s) of the Drawing Date Received _ Date Expires Final Drawing Date CITY OF ORONO 1335 BROWN ROAD SOUTH BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 Phone _ g 7 0 - Z S d--V Phone 70 - / S dZ e -5- Location of Drawing /� _ 1M Al Purpose of Raffle /C qiS E /71a -o . A9Ye O-717` List Prizes to be Raffled and their value (fair market retail value) Specify which of the prizes noted above were donated Security (minimum amount $10,000.00) in the form of Bond Insurance Copy of security to be submitted with completed application. THE ORONO POLICE CHIEF SHALL HAVE ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY DAYS (180) IN WHICH TO INVESTIGATE AND MARE A RECOMMENDATION PURSUANT TO ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 5.23, SUBDIVISION 3(D). --------------------------------------------------------------"'--------- The undersigned hereby agrees to the conditions quoted in Section 5.23 Subdivision C of the Orono Municipal Code attached to this application and any additional requirements the City staff may have. Signature of Applicant: ---Date_ -' R, --- --- - ------ FOR CITY USB ONLY: After review of application, a at recommends the following: Approval of application __ Denial of application Signature of City Official: Date: Signature of Police Chief:��-4,,(— /(cam, Date: Minnesota Charitable Gambling Control Board rOR BOARD USE ONLY 900 Summit State Bank Building 310 4th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55413 (612) 341-7676 GAMBLING LICENSE APPLICATION (Class A, B, or C) INSTRUCTIONS: 1. PRINT OR TYPC. 2. Bring completed application to local governing body, Obtain signature and date on all copies, and leave goldenrod copy. Applicant keeps pink copy and sends remaining copies to Wove address. 3. Ciumgr, in application information m t be submitted within Type or Application: ❑ Close A - fee 1100.00 (Bingo, Raffles, Paddlewheel,, Tipboarda, Pull -tabs) E) Class B - ree S 50.00 (Raffles, Paddlewheels, Tipboards, Pull -Tabs) ❑ Class C - TOO S 50.00 (Bingo Only) MWe chocks YWle to: Minnesota Charitable Gambling control Board. Applian! (Offletal, legal fuse of organization) Nat'l. MS 8oclety, MN North Star Chapter Business Addna. 2344 Nicollet Avenue City, State, Zip Minneapolis, WH 55404 Canty Hennepin Bufinama Telephone umse federal I.D. Number (612 ) 870-1500 41-079_065a ype Of Organization ❑ faternal Cl VWerana ❑ Religious U other Nonprofit Organization Type of Organization Charter International Q National ❑ State Nwoer of Yusrs in Mmaer of Articles of Evistenca (in Minnesota) Incorporation (if incerpontee) 31 years 19 Location Mrre Articles an riled New York Yee No 1. Does organization have a dues structure? X If yes, or of active members 33,000 . Has Organization been previously licensed X the Bomrd? If 22, live date . Ilan llceme ever bean denied, suspended ravokad7 If yea ehac4 .11 that apply: X ❑ar Oniad ❑Susosndad ❑Revoked A. Is Orgnizatin exempt free payment of X U.S. income tax? If yes, attach copy of letter doclarim ea tin. . Ie pegr+izatin tax esmapt from psyrnt X of Mbaeusta taxi If ya, attach copy of letter employing exemption. Site A City, 5zi t e3 County 02Q LYf/ Yee No . An dl go.CL setivitiea eon tad et the abovz site. If no, complete a sepa- rate application foal for each site as a X separate license is issued for each site. It. Is site located within city/tors, limits? one organizatics, own the site where 13. gambling activity will be conduct.d7 If X no, attach copy of the lease for the site. aseaClyme (t ens or rand Address City, State, Zip O k'CNd emb zng Meager Name Willard M. Munger, J Address 2344 Nicollet Avenue lty, state, zip Minneapolis, MN SS404 The 110,000 fidelity bond required by Minnesota tatutes 349.09 has bean obtained. Cager:y Noms Bond rusher Fidelity i Depositors 9682268 rlar of Or nization's Officers bed Title* a• Bin $lay Nuarphy Jr. Chair c• J•CEre J. Wood, Treasurer "old Friada V d. Joanne TAvin. Secret," -2- Minnesota Charitable Gambling Control Board GAMBLING LICENSE APPLICATION (Cl&is A, B, or C) GAMBLING SITE AUTHOBIZATIG By my signature below, local Is. ehforcvmunt office,: or n-.ante or the Board are hereby authorized to art., upon the site, at any time gambling 1, being conducted, to observe the gambling and to enforce the low for any unautha,,zed game or practice. BANK RECORDS AU(HURi2AT10N By my signature below, the Board 1, hereby authorir'.a rn inspect the bank records of the l:eneral uahbling Bank Account whenever necessary t• fulfil) requirements of current Somali, rules and law. OATH I hereby declare that I have read this spot icat ion and all information submitted to the Board; All information submitted ie true, accurate, and camp l ate; all other required information has been fully disclosed; 1 am the chief executive officer of the organization; I assume full responsibility for the fair and lawful operation of all activities to be conducted; 1 will familiarize myself with the law. of the State of Minnesota respecting gambling and rules of the Board and agree, if licensed, to abide by those law. and rules, including amendments thereto. Urat, legal News -o•'f Organization a--- ^`------ uc Officer) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF NOTICE BY LOCAL GOVERNING BUOY I hereby acknowledge receipt of a copy of this application. By acknowledging racelot, I admit having been served with notice that this application will b� revl awed by the Charitable Gambling Control Board and if approved by the Board, will beeome effective 30 days from the date of receipt (noted below), unless a resolutinn or the local governing body le passed which specifically disallows such activity and a copy of that resolution Is received by the Charitable Gambling Control Board within 30 days of the below noted date. approval b n 1! CC-ODOOI-01 (12/54) mite - Board Canary - Board (data entry) ORGANIZATION Home of Represantativ r Gambling (ae rving notice) /,- pink - Applicant Applicant Governing Body RENTAL AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this _day of —T 11 1985, by and between �� ^'�"'��•' S doing business at the address of !) «✓/'`��'f•i' A� in the City/County of 'ini a le'N'0 hereinafter called FIRST PARTY, and the HINHESOTA NORTH STAR CHAPTER OF THE NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY, hereinafter called SECOND PARTY, WITMESSET`I : 1. First party, being the owner of operator of business premises, for and in consideration of the sun of $ _f1le. ' ` e per month and other consideration hereinafter recited, due and payable on the loth of each menth, does hereby grant to second T party for the period beginning L ^ 1985 through 198_ the right to locate on the business premises games of chance devices consisting of those legal in the State of Winnesota, such devices to be located on the premisas where designated by the first party. (A sketch Of the location of su,h devices is shown on the last gage of this lease.) SeconI cy shall provide all employees to maintain and supervise the games of chance. First party shall have no interest in the outcome of such games of chance as stipulated by State law. 2. Second party shall pay first party the monthly rental fee, which shall be a sum sufficient to provide for adequate rental of space. In complicance with State laws, rental fees shall in no way reflect upon the variance of monthly gross proceeds of the games of chance, but shall be contingtmt upon actual space usage incurred by the games of chant: and the patrons thereof. 3. Both parties agree to comply with all Federal, State and local laws pertaining to the conduct of games of chance, 4. First party agrees that only one eligible organization at a time may operate on the above stated premises and that this premises shall be subject to rules provided by time Minnesota State Charitable Gambling Control Board and house rules compatible with Minnesota State Law agreed upon by the first and second party. S. In accordance with all State law governing charitable games of chance, the first party agrees that any relative, employee or agent of the first party as stipulated in the State law governing charitable games of chance shall not participate in selling, distributing, conducting, assisting or playing of lawful games of chance at the site herein leased. Further, no emplovee nor spouse of an employee of the second party shall participate in the purchase of lawful games of chance at the site herein leased. 6. Lawful games of chance shall take place on the leased premises during time the leased establishment is open for the lawful sale of alcoholic beverages during regular business hours mutually agreed upon by the first and second party. 7. First party agrees that no other eligible organization shall operate games of chance devices on its premises until (30) days after second party has vacated the premises. This Rental Agreement is subject to the issuance of a gambling license by the Minnesota Charitable Gambling Control Board. IH WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hand the day and year first above written. FIRST PARTY: 17 (bate) SECOND PARTY: (Date) (Date) Willard M. Munger, Jr. CITY OF ORONO KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION - P.O. BOX 66 ,] ,L "/� License 1•ear CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 19 473-7357 �'���- Atl que3V0A$ must be ansurned. License Sec must accompany apptiratiou. Aft apptications ane subject to appaocat by the City Couned. 1. Owner's Name -4- C` a 1 JC.• C C9 `� 2. Property Address 12 0(2 r . h C',c r \yo Y \'A- W h ., z A —FA -S 3. Mailing Address (if different) 4. Phone (tlome) "% 13-741 (work) 5. COMMERCIAL Kennel License Information a) Name of business b) Business activities (check) boarding veterinary care training breeding retail/wholesale sales grooming other (specify) c) Normal business hours: weekdays AM to PM Saturdays AM to PM Sun ys/holidays AM to PM d) After hours contact: Name Telephone e) Dog runs/exercise areas are: inside outside both 6. RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Information a) Maximum number of dogs (over 6 mo's old) to be kept at any one time b) Principal breed(s): (� ,-\(`i; C, \-t \,.F 9— _ c) Purpose of keeping more than 2 dogs - ti.+ d) Dogs normally kept: _ inside home _ separate kennel structure ..Ilflfffffflfflefflffflf fff}f1l:fef:f 11effff:fffff:fff:off effff llffllaf if lff:fffff:� The undenaigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council Son a Kennet Licelne as speci6ied on this SoAm; the undeAsigned acknomtedgea that a kennet ticenbe is peAmi65ive only and does not grant ally aithotity to violate any ptovision o6 any City ftunanee oA otheA tau• oA negufation; the undeuigned heae6y g4ents the City permission to inspect the ptemibes pA.ioA to ticerne appnovat and at any otheA utlaonabte time dwUng the 'icense duration; aid the undeasigned agaee.3 to abide by the AegwinemenU o6 Nunicipat Code Chaptea 63 inetuding any epeciat conditions imposed by the City foamed as pant o6 any kennet tieense app4ovat. KIND OF LICENSE Commercial Kennel License $100.00/year 1 �,Rest�ential Kennel License S 25.00/year App ,can Date .4':f}lfllfff.lflffff1f11ff 11111f111f1}Iff.........flffflf11f1fff1f1f1fff...... ff1 ror U��'y� 1+Ix YtOnl4fgf lyyr uv. @n..l - -- C .nt.- M1. CITY OF ORONO KENNEL LICEISF APPLICATION P.O. BOX 66 l.i cuusc irar l CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 19iP�' 473-7357 —,—J Alt questions amat be ansa'eted. License SCC must 4efain)1,Uy7 applicativu. .%tC ap7•f icnttons a4c subject to appievaC by the City Cow¢it. 1. Owner's Name _J/JMf_ ) E 154' r4 ,Y 2. Property Address A,4W&n ZAVi IAooL Al/BJ,li. AIV .7:K� 3. Mailing Address (if different) 4. Phone (Home) (Work) 1657,3 5. COMMERCIAL Kennel License Information a) Name of business b) Business activities (check) boarding veterinary care training breeding retail/wholesale sales grooming other (specify) _ C) Normal business hours: weekdays AM to PM Saturdays AM to PM Sinn ays/holidays AM to __PM d) After hours contact: Name Telephone e) Dog runs/exercise areas are: inside outside both 6. RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Information a) Maximum number of dogs (over 6 me's /'i ��oo,ld) !to be kept at any one time b) Principal breed(s): AdrPA7A&1 zWeAzAes c) Purpose of keeping more than 2 dogs T zi� .422 d) Dogsn R1ept: inside home separate kennel structure Jigs% ui Q aG ...i .....) +4tf}tt tf }111!}f 1y 1R 11t Hff Rt•f}R}R1f}!1f}!f#.Rfttt1....tttt1V..... The wtdwigned hereby mates application to the Oiwty CitF rowteit jo4 a Kennet License as 4peci6ied on this So4m; the wtdeu igned acknowledges that kennet ticerue is peAmi4aive only and does not grant any au.thoa.i.ty to viotate any pnov con of any City Ordinance on other taw on .%egutation; the undersigned hereby giants the City penmZ63ion to inspect the premises prio4 to License approval and at any other aeasonabte time during the ticense dwtation; and the undeuigned agtees to abide by the nequi%ements o6 Muit.iei.pat Code Chapter 63 inctuding any speciat conditions .imposed by .the City Coancit as pant of any kennel License appnovat. KIND OF LICENSE Commercial Kennel License $100.00/year _/ Residential Kennel License $ 25.00/year ?Lt ' a -/`-Irk 9,35-.00> Applica,nt Date w .Rc ..}.u.....u..}f.fffefl.ueul.f. •fff•tst•u serf t.••!u}f u}utft CITY OF ORONO KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION — P.O. BOX 66 Liccnsc Year CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 lg� 473-7357 ACC questions must be ansrceted. License ice must acecmpany appticatimn. Att apptications are subject to appaovaC by the City Councit. 1. Owner's Name Xjjm NtERItIIL LAW IEK St. 2. Property Address 3obo :!v SI. Lowe LAKe K41J•SS35L 3. Mailing Address (if different) Co• )PJ• 6tL— WKoluo 4. Phone (Rome) �LCM-$58f} (work) 30.3cf39 5. COMMERCIAL Kennel License Information N/^ a) Name of business _ �T b) Business activities (check) boarding veterinary care training breeding retail/wholesale sales grooming other (specify) c) Normal business hours: weekdays AM to PM Saturdays AM to PM Sundays/holidays AM to __PM d) After hours contact: Name Telephone e) Dog runs/exercise areas are: _ inside _ outside _ both 6. RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Information a) Maximum number of dogs (over 6 mo's old) to be kept at any one time q- b) Principal breed(s): /Vt:u/Fouuh L4N/ c) Purpose of keeping more than 2 dogs AeEf.bmr) Noce" d) Dogs normally kept: inside home separate kennel structure •1ff1f 1111RR111ffffifflf1f1f1}f}}Iff111111f1f111flff Rf lfllffflf Rl111f 1Rf 11fi11ff1ff The undena.igned hereby makes appticatian to the Orono City Councit for a Kennet License as speciiied on this 6o4m; the undetsigred ackno,ete.dges that a Kennet ti.cenee ie peAmi6ive onty and does not grant an:J autII04ity to vi0tate My p4ovisi0n of any City O4dinance on other tac on negutation; the unde4aigned hereby g.4att5 the City permission to inspect the ptemiaes p4ion to License app4ovat and at any other 4easonabte time du4•i.ng the License duAdtion; and the andetsigned agrees to abide by the eequitemen of Nunicipat Code Chapte4 63 inctuding any apeciat conditions .imposed by the City Councit as pant 0f any bennet ticense appuvat. KIND OF LICENSE Commercial Kennel License $100.00/year =r✓ Residential Kennel License $ 25.00/year����� .ta...c. Jalr s.8 t8s198S .0`.Oct) App scant Date .�1f':fl.f1f111ff1lfflffllffllllffffflff............... f.......flf.flllflflfflllfllf♦ OF 0e011 dAt P¢Fio+) t-/ 7o hdr EMa L-NO YAMS OIV GIOSi GRO5S -4 °!nL LOJ d NOERSON RL 31 4994.45 dENSON MR 1? 5CO3.25 3JRZIE4 SA 31 250S.54 3R•NEa ^.d 9^ 163.1n B9:11KHAUS JF 42 4471.72 3URMASTER WO 31 4712.)1 .AL SUN AJ 42 4Z7].2d C iirCK JM f: 172050 C4_SK:CK ]B 31 450.52 E nR:NRc.19 OL 9-, 2: 45.6d ERiCKeOy )J fi ERICKSO4 SR 31 5246.:2 FRITMR JM 31 5111.'6 G:FFRON 4v 33 1Y79.92 G_vuAR)S::I JR 42 5414.-1 .?:10U:ST "0 91 34.=, 0 S"_iORT JD 42 3914.'7 GR:FF:T4S riE 31 4792.23 74 1Z 3322.44 42 3481.95 H :'.5 :•1i :J 31 37:115 7' 2Sd6.23 J-?705 TJ 33 3714,24 ,UM+:S:y 00 31 435%,72 K:L31 OM T1 i626.54 K:=4l1CZUK 4 31 439::.T2 K•:U-SA CA 15 1'42,37 K=iMuU OL 91 .17 Ku c:aN TM 15 5'67044 L: TT IN JC 15 3232.54 M.BUSTi JA 33 4"9.5S MA•,UEL 'M 9' 1147,42 4CGJYA4 LR 41 4165.53 M:a^JCZTY; J 31 45i5.7O 4,GS5 FT 57 3.: 65.26 •;A A1' TL 12 ZZu2.T3 0r 1r, of ct 51 2472.C7 �AL'tEa °R 31 571 ^ '/ 11 47.2.31 ?'_T-R 531 rSoij ?a;Y] 9J 12 5211.0 JUAJT 4A 92 367,.76 R?1CRAFT JE J3 -.'v SASS JJ 42 3481.45 31:LLNE2 CL 93 :. " S:LST:J -a 42 S535.:2 13i4.66V„4,, JL ktE= C.nn 551.44 FEB of 1985 ).70 1149028 1]7R.78 31.60 1179,"? .1 74RP•13 +420.18 1461o4 55.:0 1711.'7 1205.55 d75.77 •61.12 1?7.1? 1O3.4a 5 d3.:4 92F.S6 :97.e9 1.7].3J 1-'97.6d 6°2.23 molo 1294.72 ;1'.52 1221 .5J 222.54 1 J51.52 1344.66 (41.:4 553.2^ ..) 24 . 3 7 i15.1/ 61.51 977.55 T51A2 7 N.)b CITY OF jRVi 4 Y ENP LwNJ NAPE 7!Y GR1;5 29JSS EYP/ALLOT SLIGO SR 03 n*.?1 1833 SMITH JR 92 3987*93 1:. 25.78 S TCFFEN4AG PE 93 3815.12 763.J4 STE YENS 9G 93 SUTTON P£ 12 1649.70 405.60 T04CZTM MY 31 4545.IP 1252.04 COUNT 9F+'17 359412.75 PAID 0'::.43 TOTAL 0^737 T TkL TOTAL F:CA T%X GROSS = 25.413. JS '4=LSYCRS FIC 4 = ,,PJUP H'ILTn S C•YS:CLAYfS H:4LTM =LI-4 C = PLU: =ROSS/SLUT SH7'_L7 J = MCJICIL CITE, PLA"I E = PRUOS :T:AL F = CC"3. " E4LTH CAPS G M!N44ESOTA 142 H = TR6LS-4'4FRIC.1 OCC. I = 9ANREFS LIF_ J = MUTUAL ;E.iVIC-S X = MUTUAL JF 7MAHA 4 44 NA N = NiCILL_T EITEL = LF49UE ^F :IT!PS Z = WEAL" CA 4_ 44I9T 4CC% M::3LN; HJrc CO4E FOR 304E '4DL'S • 14es CITY of coma CHECK NC6ISTCN 02-25-e3 PAGE I ,t CHECK NO. DAT! + OUYT Y. N00) ITEn oESCNIPTION ACCOUNT 47 I4V 4 P.O. 4 4ESSAK 1{l6006_ / 1$1 1.40 A0A0 11INNESOTA INC OFF SUPPLIES 01-4210 J16-12 - ' ' 4�6 ...• NO ■E MCS Of a_I NC SUPPLIES 01_42J¢JSt 1l__ • l64U6 __.-__7.43 .__._-IC 1.10 AC:0 __.___QIF NINN:30TA INC OFF SUPPLIES 01-4213o61 1515 0l6006 I�• 12 qt/SS 1.10 ACq 0•NINM.' OTA INC OFF SUVPL!E5 11-4210 J!6.15 OS60W .72/21 /lS_ 1 40 --'iil:Zi- -- ACNO N11N• T& INL__ IFF SUPPLIES_ -Su - 01-4210-121-31 ----d1-Ci")a.-ETx:Ts 8lrf6Di-7177f/77 6-cllo Ii171 6-iie aft 036006 1a121/a5 201.62 ACAO•NINNCSOTA INC OR EQUIP Ot-AS40.016-17 1 ICJ ...... .. :• BS: 3-- -i4Igji iu --- nxr xtsc Eanv �i=55ai=iL6=iF- - 1 17.10 CKI OS6v16 :12114% 25.1} A4•il)al .-NE•1 'IT 4LWGAOO fl-tlaf•SI S-![ - .. - 2S.S1 CNS 076066 .}/}1 /6S A'.LS n]A:-1Y : ECIf ^. is PPr;"Uff '1-a)I2-121. 51 A•.65 0 ...... •.. CNS ' 0561:34 .2/If/4S 64.is +Yfu 1: PA°E1 )FF 1UPPL:E' '1.1210-310.12 - - - `56034 .ef?1/45 4.14 AV-4:' a1-r4 31F 39ppt:II `l-421J•156•14 2 • ^s6034 .1/2t AS .71 AY C41I P.+R )FF )YPPLICt '1-6110-156.14 576UH d/I3 /41 t1.E6 Alf" P.a_q 0!f $UPPL tC: 01-a}10-LN-•S - - IS6074 .2/}1/A5 .11 1'K.34 --ER )FF SJPPL:ES ;1-4210-T26.31 1, 456014- .MIT •I3.S4 A40n2i J.7I OF r SIPLIES r1-4110-t}a33 -5 .34 .I/fl, I }a.'I A1C411 Pa1Eq IF;SJ:PLIES 11.4210-246.42 - neos5 12121/e5 I.15 14C43. Pa-:'3 }fF s11F PL;r 11-4>lo sis.Q: . - ...... .. cos a 756-63 1/21145 1Z5.•0 14401 0C4 it :FF :'OUC>- 125.50 .....• .•. CNS 156UP1 .1/2t/95 17.J1 4.".)1IAI A 5^4: "'IT GLO;/GN)S 1561161 .}/21Igs 11.'0 ALICI;I:61 A Y14S 1-IT 6LO1/GP03 71.130L515.4. ••.... - - •.. CNS 036 JPC _ 1211as W.'^ AuAv%;r^4 41.11Oq CL1T+:SO ALLYCC ..- ...... •.. CNS _^ , `54111 •2I21 q7 1S).'3 C.ESA:CN-;UT fU T4:AN ALLU-E )1.4221-126.51 .. L ll CNC K A .•OAT N / 4 � I•J 75e131 L171/4S '' -RSel 51"— 72R11RS- 9 {lsi u2/21/4S ^SAI Sf .2Jt11•5 •56111 .Z121 J 15 '5SISL • .551S; .2/tlls5 .fSI T' .2/71/11s 73et.! .217f 1R5 u u.. ^.SOtS! .212.165 ' ^ssas• .a/21185 O532Se .2/21/Ss 1532s9 .2J21/Ss •� 7Ss xSe .2/L1/!f { "CHECK RESISTER . 02 2S-Ss PAGE . Z _ a, _1 r AR90 NT YLROOi ITEM DESCRIPTION, 6 0W2T 41. INV, X P.O. Y NES:AGC .• :Fi CKA :OLA VER31R• RIX OURCN 71_41ZO-515-90 • R ---- CASE-- -- 93.io COL•VTIL -IFE INS J0 HEALTH INS al-41S1-126-31 • 15.10 CSLSVIAI LIFE INS :0 NCALTH INS 71-N S1•I29. )1 16 45.10 1AT.r0 CSNRr17IAL OL39 PIT JANITORIAL SCRY 71-a )19.09b 17 223.41 E3RMr.:U: RL)3 HIT -- JSNSTSRrAL $--V -129-51 _� 611.13 • •. e. • CIIR-RTV 34LL, TJF JAN AS SALES TAX 71-3570-000-0' If.:: C-PR-.-Y i.Li, tA. JAN SS !ALES rAX 41.277x. 103✓ _ 3 C`-%'X'V rAL:, TAX J14 35 S:LES 'a. 71427E :3J•'- • •.. CAs • 29.67 GILL: i1N RVT SLOG/UROS H -afa S.099-it - - - -- t9.47 CJLLSTIY -%I .LOo/9401 71-4143.51S.91 • {.`: CJLLSGAV 41T %,"t-073 !a -a SA3.590.93 $3.41 • - • • ••- CF3 S.139. C a1L' • EP::V3lV ASSES:NG :E•Y 71-{S `7-:59. to • 3.1J9.'3 • _ S.r{ Sv rCV1JV/AI4i :OYt /:CNO]L :1-a3 Se 129.$1 ••• CA1 • •."C 3'L3:v YA.LET :C C nr/;C-JCLS -1-4 SIS-129. $1 ..•0 • -02.11 Grwl'IE PARTS Co VOTOR SNELS vl-4x20-249•4t ".• 201.SS 6rwIN: PLATS CI sw!P/VTS/ACCLSS 01-4232-249-42 S.S. 37'Nly: PIRTa CO 'Wi.,PTS/AtcrsT 17-{2 sx-Sag-91 ..19 9TVNINE V.413 C3 ENtoJ9TSlACCr SS 75-a232-S69-92 ;• 31•.52 036264 u2/21/55 -- - ---354.1S 354.?S 64IOGS BC:R GIST BCCR PuRC1l rl-4615-S15.90 p ••, uu•• ..-Cgs ..'• 6?Yr ;4itYt M6 Sf\v --- :04I%SCNOCl2 3S.30 „ • .. _ ^Sl29/ 42/21 /!+. SN•-0 Ili R9 CnT :VI.F$ Pt:C C]Ni r_[^]JLS M.{IS6-129•)t :. _ _ _ _ .. ol ;` F ...•.• __ _ _. -. _ ___ __ --- . _. C1t3.___- M� 1561,19 .t121/as 1/1.q W[ 4 ^I Tl CR3 .aTSI-URL ?f-46M.359-14 • 12i,+1 ZKS B163dI .2/211aS SS7. ? X:L3) VCLI:V :U'B1V0 A"WCC 51-4121-It9.31 -- � .•...• .. CRS • • 156319 SW118, 247. L•LIT•L. •SS :CY LIABILITY IL:T1 -1-4Va-169.15 9S61i9 .2/?Iles 249,-] 3 L•Itl :93 a1N L:48IL:TI 11-43?3-129•31 -- OS6s99 .2I2118S 1.116.11 - %A LI ^'IT-41 :U OCN L•4BILl•T •1.4572-129•4a • .Wt 1.116.11 LIIIT-4.'V5 L:AB:LITT ]1-4f1]•NP62 056309 185 .Milas 512.1] L•Cl`-I :IS 3!4 Ji•I L.-ABILITY [14TI 11-43r0-290-01 - .. "6399 Ss6390 .21711" 126. -0 L-CIT•11 :IS .RO.C4rT :XsS11-129. 31 ^56599 .2127185 1,.'0 LIr:T-1I :Vs YSO•ta Tl `-al>1-129•)t ,�-altt-197. .212l 54. l L•CI• TI 'la"IS a. )._: TT MS MS 61 - is61V0 ^561F9 IRS .2121/55 1t4.'] L•ICIT•4. '93 'W:l FL]P•1 'I -a 3'1-1t9-11 0 ^16109 .2121165 164.'] •CI• L. 'IS •90•• FLIATCR 'n4113.240.12 .2/211R1 164.'0 LI^.IT•JB 'VS I19:• il9a TER •-a171.)30.6f -- IS6399 156309 .MI Its 12a.:I L.Ct T-AR "43 :8T] 1X; '�-a 14•)H.12 0S6S99 -2/21/a5 11.1• LICR-1. !VS •JT9 •XS OS6349 _2121 Its 5.649.15 LtCI•-44 !VS a'JT9 :VS 314-129.3S_ 11•a114 n 29. 11 �. 016599 .t/211XS 6.13 LP CI LlS '1: 4JTJ :VS q -43 F4-119. S5 •56399 .2/21115 ZOO..:. L.CIT'-1V -VS <Ufa ^1.41 F4-t49.at 056399 .2121/15 LPCtT-an IVS :9T0 ;VS I." •-4114.260-e1 016399 .11211sl 52:.,I LRITt IX 'VS SONSS INS ^1-4315-169.15 • _ 1221 AS. ] LNCtf-1R 'VS VO9i13 ]1-UrM ]69./S 156394 976599 12121,11 w-.] L4P-aB :Vs LIABILITY i79 L:49:U TT C161V9 41] N]:! 1X :Is •IS •13P:RTY !X; II-{3/1-H s•V1 0563Vo :11211:1 q3 d^.-.1 L•C1• %A ' .Uri :X3 )..a3/4-S11-a1 !" __- 05"99 _212f .2/21r5S 196.•0 L.Ct, an !VS :V1 LCABILITT r2-4320.139-9f-��----- --- - , 056390 •2 /21IaS SA.I9 IXCiT-N 14% •POP--RT1 :XS RdS21.749 % I�" 0663v9 .21?11 AS 28.No LNCIT-44 .IS ROM-4TT INS TS-U)1-569.92 �•'. 036399 C2121165 2500 LNCIT-41 143 EQUIP PLOATC4 I1S6799-mrn�Bs-- -----e3res--[Nrt r-4N I9s---iuso-t>ts-"'- --23c43Y 056199 02/tl/n 1.651.00 LMCIt-4A 14S OEM LIABILITY 7HQ70-f90•ri n.'b I, 1a ' 056799 U2/21/97 269.30 LNCIT-49 INS PROPCATI :as t4-4st1-590-91 T19679M-'--rIxt179f---- 1R:7tF LOCI I=iM-+7f----?QUIP-rL)4TCT-y[:i17GS9G0i 0565v9 62/21/15 p.30 LNCIT-44 112 AUTO !NS 14-43/4-S90-91 "' A I9.98c__lo . _ y -036ILi ` ' Ctlit/e3 - -104.60 P4:dB UPai i±i45IM;-6 ssw ntw[N COisou- - --- -:1=43:6=120%1f--- -- •�•i C44 i O364J4 L2/21/15 S6.44 TNC LAM±9 .ITOOPUSL 11.4322-420m SS.4/ • 6 ...... • . Cgs - • C.6415 .2/21/NS 144.•0 LJAt> Na 1 25 -1-4340.039. I2 6 0164J5 .21211-5 2.•1 L1611 91I4T-NO^TPC 11- 4 N 0-069-II • 1>643S R/T1 r95 L1013 ;:+r; CC is.- N= 12S ^1-4)U-169.11 "-- • Ca6U5 .T RT nS 276.'0 216.T6 L1413 :^9 :'1 s!C--J='1 lI-4SS2-369.15 6 -.6435 .T/21/9S >51.46 Ll iti ltt% e407-J1Y -1.4355.769.I5 056435 '.ix/21/9S LI^.I: v:NF 22-4140.549-91 - - • 056U5 .2/21/65 5.11 65.11 L'IT A.I&Y SEA" 12-452-S49-91 6 CS641$ .1171,112121/S 1t1.55 L'S11 Ric-jA4N 1+I4 PNOC-JAY lx-USS-SN-OI N.6433 .2/T1/9! 1.55 Lllt3 -4INT-NOOCN 11-4352-S69.92 • ^.6435 .2/21145 14.12 Llats sjc.j. •• 1-1-4SS2-S69.92 e ^. N1S .2 /21 .45 )tt.a2 U11; OAT, OAT4 a4.C-J%� )1-4 SSS-Sl9-li 1013.62 • ' •..... ....CNS L.v44 LYM.iN It)S/A);/NtT SUa "1-Ktl-;v9-IT ...... ----.KS 9 -'649L-:/21/eS •25.49 MIPC 9s hl U4+" 66 .'JT) 9YT 9.61/S `2/21/1S It.S 71.N N:T41 JASTC C^4T40L -6CC -M 15 • - fa .5 S1.<1 . • � 0.649S .2/21145 21.13 vats 1.Ir:l CS • ANT N:sC 'CUP '-414t-129-11 ••••CMS 9 11-t x•2-)00-C7 ^CNS 71-1142-249-4C 1965 city or Oftwo .90 •. t / ' 1 ul 05•••• 02/21/65 144.20 tat•]0 91• 1 p•� fS13U .2121 /is 16.10 ■■ rS e7U .t/tt/75 2t.:C Y•' 'sNt6 .2/t11RS 7l65a• :2 Rf /BS 651 15 •ses1r y '565a! 1/r1/•5 ^5651e _2121r47 e7654•- - _2121/45 �. ^S 6SaA .1/21I45 • rs6ssv-- Nt/n/n 03]559 .z/tllel OS6Sl0 .2I21/!1 oses/o .z/a /s1 sesri .:av71 nes/e .zrt+/e5 +. oSSS/9 tRl/S1 as6S .2/2f a1 osesM .t/a Ia a. OS6S1J !/21IB1 �•- L56S91 CSs Sv/ 211119f a26.il 317.33 1.115.^a 19.52 S-.is 2•.'6 t`.•0 I S:.a2 e•.s3 CHECK RCGISTCR 02-25-33 P>i[ i ' J * • xx eCNrrlt ASSN HEALTH INS 9t-4151-12e-St C_yl a, MIM_SRISTA -- TREE OISP CH6S 11-4591-240-42 RUN" IN.. AGENCY RJ4.wl 113 44!4Ct HUR-41 INS AGMT YaVRit Ha JYaa! NI V911C xUOW it 4,VNyO NNOWSC NavA\•f MaiOVAIIC YtvAiA! w1yJYAR[ NlvaA" w1>OVIir NSval-e wIRO,AAE NtVa RRr hayOVA•C 13MIC ..RJVAar Navaiar 41104A2r RiP Y:P VrLL 9`ar+.!s1UN KILL '11ar4.r ST'lN 4raL 'n=ta-IS1: IN N-L: '-T-.rST IN I-LL 9•°T`1.CST IN YiLL Y.aN .0 STi iY a-LL V•4Ta!STAM B!LL 714R SHOP IY; 11 Nill.S15.1' life :Ns 12-451a.519-V1 :UT) Ivy 17-4314-Se9-97 50:/3RO3 PNT SW '1-4231•199.11 6LOS/raR95 PNT 31•> '1-{}11.129-i1 BLOB/GRJS MT SUP 11 •ai 31-290.61 PSS /!9Yi•/att!SS rl-a} g-129-SI PTS /C WtP qCC: SS Y-a28-1ii-51 >•v roul P/Ac nss- '1-az lz-ttv-az PTs/_oat Ss I2-a:Ti-S69-YI P%RYrT aLJlr Svn] SUP 1S-a2+t•569-42 >TSrEOU:r /ACC:SS 11-asg-569-42 Sto G/:NOi FVT SUP 11-a2 S1-Sq-9! •• fR. ST la Ci ;1.112S-2N-t2 Yt{LI TIis rt-a 8a-369-92 •• CRi _ i •iLLP..7 N! 11-t)27-S1S-v0 n L_arON[ 11-a S27.O1f•i] ADVERTISING /1-a1!)•S15-91 -CL TrL:PHONE 11.43M.S69.92 •• CNS +21 To am --^1-4141-039.11"-- - -- "--- -- "- 4rn ia 1124 TO 2/10 11.4141.040-13 1 1 e1 ��'. ^'v .. S 7".,r e, ♦ yam: _ :', �;�'tt • "G.,':.4�._CNCCR REGISTER �'. S •• -, '0 T•25-DS •I PAge "-_6 M Y 4001 •• ITEM OESCRIPTION ACCOUNT MI. NY. R P.O. I NCSSAGE • .93 Prp1 '• ' Pni! 1123 TO P/13 01-4141-059-1 t' �- -," �"�• r • f 99,LS�T PEiI 'ER. 112e TO 2111 ,1YfJ` 01-1141-069.15 • -' • 6.y1- P_u 1123 Ti-F/li_--.1i-a 1l(�'r 9-i7. - - - • 056591 021 ziI15 1.001.R P[RA PER. 1/19 TO Z/10 01-U61-111-31 T R 016192 02/21/9! 3T.41 P.-AA P+RA 1129 TO 2110 ±1-4141-115.31 + LIfI---�- - -Kfi-T/ZFro •992.�. no U2/21/95 434:66 PTJu - PENA 1/24 TO 2110.. 01-4141-126-31 • 036592 02/21/U ^ 140.53 Peas PENA 1146 TO 2110 - O1-1t61-12M33 P[NT6gil-y". - -.. _. -._. - a5659/ .Z/21/85 17.76 PIRA PENA 1/26 T7 2110 M.N t1-290. 61 95659? 2/21/85 163.90 PENA . PENA 1126 TO 2/10 71-4141-515-93 65N7-T2-RnN3 ---7679r-- P!R6---------- PENA 1ne-1d- 2/fr-'-/2=CiiT.Si►:vf-- ^ 056sor G2/2t/H 144.26 PEAA PORN 1/29 T6 2/10 T3-4161-569.92 :'- 036¢9/ J2/21/65 45.56 PCN6 Pb 1/2e TO u 2113 74-4111-590.93 - ---- �� ...... • 0566uf C2/21/s5 P25.10 PAAOELL R!RN F3KS7EI . r 1NAN:}AL CONSUL' 11-4370-169-15 "R 056615 .1/21 IV! Ill..& PERNT4 TPa:R A+PATA PVT AUTO r2-4141.S49.91 - -- - - • 156613 .2121191 1r1.16 -:RATS T.+:R PC.A:• NNT 103 71-4341-569-92 6 2eS.10 05661r .2R11%% 252.75 P..1T3 •aer9RT 4" !JPPL:CS 01-6210-129-31 M.+5 6 .....• - .. ...-CRY .2/21 /st Zf7. `: a•4. iUiP.I :H L'PC.EaS El•tSNN29•Sl 6 ������ • ••CRf U1662• .1121,41 i.91i.62 a. -NY 42:4 & A35U: LEGAL /EE4 .4±10.000-0 C5661• ')R1+s! 102.70 NCN A 434UE LEGAL PZT4 U-2Jt3-730-0' 056SZ& .2/r1/6$ 31.'0 P2•NA. NA:. S :SSG: LT611. FEES - T3-2040-000.1. -_ 6. r3R.62 6 ...... .. :R3 -.fee•2 .2/11+sf 33.IS AT aA'JL N?nM 3Pr Sdra L:E: •P-6i13.129-f1 N 6 •... ••j -.5611C _2/25/es 1.+P: .'^ 0?N 3'RET:gP SOYs et CLCTNT46 ALL - -'" " - -- - - '- ----- • . ...... ---..«Cgs -- Y 77,ONLc RCazeT .7.. + OSe/Oe J2+z1/ss N1.ff - MUMS !MINTED - 24 CLOTNI44 ALL 01-2040-000-043 •6796= sz.tl/es----_�:u!1[rJT11t u9L[YI T[0___IIILe_C�NLJ,16- Di.N6a129-7! 1:!a -- •`• 036e35 4z/a1/es 27.9^ MARNI9e Utts INC A 01-4351-249-42 -- ....•• •... CR] M• J2/21/85 1S+.16 RI TCA 1003JCFI CO -" fWZV?pTf/ACC{]S__ ----12•{2S!-S�i�t `"-----"---T • 5s6eea .2/2t•as 110.43 YM•t.- 1NI4L CO GL1S -•-a le0-les-ss a ^sesa vl/21/ff 720.a4 Ye:Tc 1. 4rA1 A+ AY:VI f0 IIYg II NAI PITROI N JLai61.ISS-it"-- - ----- - . aae.;a . ....Cgs :S6Y]v .:/Tl/RS 13s.'? YA $Y:Y:T)T ER:MC MMgi/p{p/EOCIs Gt-a21]-129. 31 • a. 0S69II :2/21/85 1^.9f NJNs)% RA- co 7G)/i IOCRI00CLs ]1•a2a0-079-12 " • $69.1 :2/2t/61 11.15 p'Joz)v MA^ CO dSog:/p{R:mcL1S - ^1-aN0-129.31_ OW .2/21/aS 11.9s MIJSIY MA• C7 MJ2g7/pEploacks 71-4240-249-42 A R.1S . ^S69C2 .Uz1Jas 163.10 L 6 v M7a :Ac ST RAT sup Ct-4273•249.42- ta^..-I -56911 _2/21/45 4'1 .IL:Cc R!C77.41T :•n{p COY:UI• Gt.a l:6.129•S1 136934 .2/2//65 17.'^ MTL -IRE 1R0CT IS•A Y.NMc.'sNV 01-43p0-174-77 W.'o 1569J .2121191 141, 3 sT 7L±J) :T Uv:M CI%F/SCY^!lf :1.0 i6-tz9. )1 - a .....• •.. CGS • ' +K2222 .2/21/SS 42S.:3 C-IWI-144C7TR G.L •, 421.2) • " 11C12/7 .2/21/p5 - - - 21.pr Tin JAC363 -- -ILC43[ ..' .� t.a . 3T1f. ,+:` h1%•" - CHECK REGISTER �-.ii 70b23-6S FADE S� �MOUMi � R • EAT 1 '•Vr 4CR30+ ITEM OCS[AIFn.1N .[COUNT I F.O. S N ss ADC e3v f TALAs Is Co4T TO FICA 1ne To r/t�` -N ir.Ol9. r; -.1.• MUST .i 23 COV/ F3 --- - FIC I/2- TO - - 1 MANUAL NC727A 32/21/S1 1.14 ST T1FAS SS CITY FO FICA 1/24 TO 2/13 01-4142-3$9-I4 N.NULL '; ♦ 1C7274 3212113% 163.14 ST WAS I3 CO4T FD FICA 1/26 to 2/l0 11-4142-369-15 rANUAI • r>�2FmF --- - t0�q"--lT-R!p'St C64Td�NV7�--' 1t T2FA' 02121A3 S6.74 ST TMC►'3 is C14T FD FICA 1/iA To 2013 01-4142-1IS-31 MANUAL C 72I6 :z/211e5 299.17 3T T4CAS t3 C14T FIT FICA lF2l TO 2113 01.6142.174.33 MA Ttst—e2/21i37------ - lvr.�F---sT's.us-Is e31s FD----f:e./22-ee-xn3--rs=6r6r2cM:"tr----.AM—- 1Cr27A .2121195 29.45 ST TM!AS is C44T FO Ft:A I/26 TO Z113 01-4142-290-61 MANUAL t '1 2/21/65 92.15 $T ri!AS Is C14T To FICA 1121 To 2111 71-A1A2-fts-90 M.1uA - .--'T:R7/37-- -- -- 72:74-- --Or T1CAS Is COOT Flo-- F:Cc I22e-i"717--SiT12---i2M9T— R MCtzr4 Oz/21/61 143.07 3111EA1 53 CONT FIT FICA 112e To 2113 77-6142-56169Z MANAL "C McFfN .21211AS rs.61 ST T3:4S IS CHIT F1 FI:A vze To 211E --- 74-616z-590-93------ -_M.NUu --- 1+439.53 . -- ...... :Fs - -- 42,066.44 - N40 41 TOTAL _- FU40 _CV 117.'0 •UN1 Al TOTAL -SR;! LIMN •HOMER[ F46 i .. 1.111.M7 LV41 71 TOTAL IU406 LIQUOR OF!AT:',S FV40 •VVT 12 T9NL rATCr 0F!LAT:`.0 f:MO 4.417.51 tA.A11.5r .VV1 71 TOTAL IEViM OFe LAT:V9 F1N0 T.716.97 FUN' Ft TOTAL 11Lt CdILS! 9!IIAT IV6 FO _ P..563.29 TOTAL 6 A PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATES PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMA^_ION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 1.slum 2. AMNp% R lb fin( 3. d 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. .0. il. L2. L3. (4. L5. L6. 17, 1H. 19. 20. I nfo r in a+ fort IE +e..,00 M 5 cau n , A AS I ot me" z-zs-e'r i SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY ....,.. MEMORANDUM nrb.n.cro. ,•oo.nv anlx xaon•. •w IVlvsvrllf cx•.n. TO: Directors Lnfll rMf <Y.wt• `•4Gxn LIT..11•. FROM: Glenn Purdue f ow n.uH ,o S.O. DATE: January 16, 198', nglf .41 c o x.rrvcs SAGS RE: Financing of Combined Sewer Separation in x , of 1•11 ff L.an.f•cx Minneapolis, St. Paul, and So. St. Paul ,Aucuc•., ,o,ofo vr;I rum ...ew000 .,,,,_..n•. Background: ..mxwn N..Ma au r.m o10,0 1. An excerpt from the October Minutes is attaches. ofno n..ouw 2. A copy of a letter to Tom Triplett is attached. .b.Yvs 1.I f: 411•v.xpn slNIS..., Recen •_ Develoomrnts: - sxo.Na. vi t xD In the near future a bill which will address the need ..ow.s xuoxn to establish a regional or state mechanism for funding ^L'o"• accelerated sewer separation in the three cities will M•tLU w000,...R be introduced in the Legislature. SRA, AMM, and the two suburban lobbying groups have made known their opposition to the establishment of a state grant fund for this purpose. Instead, these groups have stated support for an interest -free match- ing loan, the interest to be paid by the state. The Met Council and state agencies are developing a proposal. At this point, no opposition to the SRA position has surfaced (with the very n,. ble exception of the Governor's public position, taken last fall). Action: Each SPA member should make its pos on known to its legislative delegation in the very ar future. The full.wing points could be made: The other cities in the metro area have built separated sewers at their own expense. It would 2000 FIRST BANK PACE WEST • .MINNEAPO IS. MINNESOTA $5402 1 (011) 5300545 be unfair to ask them to pay for sewer ccnstruc- tion in the three cities. The cost of sewage treatment will increase for member cities when the three citier complete their separation construction, while the treatment cost for the three cities will go down because they no longer will be paying to treat storm water. All three cities have a timetable for separating their sewers, using their own funds. These timetables are to be compressed by state and federal action. Only the costs of compression should be considered as a state burden. All principal costs should be borne by the three affected cities. An interest-liee loan for one-half of the cost of construction, on, a matching basis, is equitable. This might be accomplished -by Met Council bonding to fund loans with interest being paid by the state. (The loan fund would be approximately $110 million; interest might to $40 million.) / Owl OC-T up. lF L ' �� 1 5 Y Y -f%ru-k-s -Z S7 f C. Combinpd Sewer verflow. Mr. Purdue reported on the status of permitting for Minneapolis, St. Paul and South St. Paul to discharge untreated sewage into the Mississippi from combined s wer overfiow. He distributed a "whits paper" issued October 17th by the Metropolitan Council. A copy is attached. The paper proposes a state construction fund of approximately $50 million annually for a period of five years. Forty percent of the monev would go to th, metropolitan area and the remaining 601 would go to outstate cities for sewage treatment projects. The three cities with CSO permits would receive 50% of the funding of remedial construction from the state fund. The paper states that EPA may forbid additional sewer hook-ups thrnuch.cut the mwcc sT sy tem if a program for completion of construction by about 1991 1s not adopted ',y state government. Mr. Purdue stated his view that this sanct. •n is aimed primarily at the other cities in the metro area, and he stated that he believes they are the onl•: governmental units which may oppose a state-fundea grant to the three cities. The position paper also suggests as an alternative that EPA may mandate the method of abating CSO, and the position paper states that a method mandated by EPA might not be the method most acceptable to the metropolitan area. A general discussion of the issue followed. Mr. Thomson suggested that eliminating storm water inflow would result in increased plant capacity for sewage treatment and thus the excess cost could be considered a SAC charge. There was a consensus that it would be inequitable to stop additional hook-ups in cities which have separated sewers. There was also a consensus that those cities which have separated sewers should not now pav the cost of the separation in other communities. Mr. Spore suggested that accelerated construction could be financed by the state through a loan program, rather than throuah a grant pro- gram. Foliowing more discussion, it was moved by Spore, seconded by Boeck, that counsel be directed to inform the Met Council, other appropriate agencies, and executive and legislative branch leaders that SRA favors a state -funded loan program to accelerate ecnstruction. The motion carried unanimously. Upon suggestion by Mr. McGraw and by consensus, counsel was also directed to prepare a summary and resolution for review by member city councils. Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Bldg., St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 POSITION PAPER ON LEGISLATION FUNDING AN ACCELERATED STORMWATER AND SANITARY SEWER SEPAPATION PROGRAM in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area PROPOSED LEGISLATION The Council and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency will ask the 1985 session of the Minnesota State Legislature to establish a state construction grants program to Provide financing for accelerating the separation of sewers in Minneapolis, St. Paul and South St. Paul that convey both stormwater and sewage. The program would provide funding to meet state and federal permit compliance schedules for eewer separation in the metropolitan area and also. funding for outstate communities to meet federal Clean Water Act requirements. An annual appropriation in the $40 to $50 million range will be requested. Of this amount, 2/5th3, or from $16 to $20 million, would be available to the Twin Cities Area for sewer separation, with 3/5ths allocated to the rest of the state to meet mandated federal water quality deadlines. The metropolitan area portion, plus a share of the state's federal construction grant allotment dedicated to sewer separation, would be matched dollar -per -dollar by the three cities with local funs over a five-year period. Total estimated cost for the sewer separation program, not counting regional facili'ies, is $214 mi],l,iun. WHY IS THE SEPARATION PROGRAM NEEDED NOW? ass:ceiwpi never. wormaiiy, the pipes convey the wastewater to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission's Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant in St. Paul for treatment. However, the interceptor sewers leading to the plant and the already huge plant are not large enough to handle heavy rain flow, so automatic bypass gates in the sewer system are ocened to divert the wastewater into the river. During a year with average raintall and snowmelt, an esti=ted 4.6 billion gallons of mixed sewage and stormwater pour into the river. It occurs, on the average, every three days during warm weather. Heavy rains also cause local street flooding and sewer back ups in homes in some areas served by combined sewers. -n n a wooers. na:ner, all sewage must receive treatment so advanced that 90 percent of the pollutants are removed prior to discharge into a water body. The combined sewer overflow discharges require a state permit acceptable to the federal government that acknowledges the violation but includes a mandatory plan and program to end the discharge. T,.e discharges can be eliminated by completing a storm and sanitary sewer separation program initiated by the cities many years ago, or by collecting, storing and treating all the combined stormwater and sewage. The Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant currently treats 73 bil. Son gallons of wastewater annually. It now meets state and federal standards. 11 is was not always the case. It took ten years, and $400 million of state, federal and regional funds, to upgrade the plant to the point where its treated discharges have only a minimal impact on the Mississippi River. Priority was given to the plant during the last decade because its discharge was 16 times'greater than was the total discharge from the 87 combined sewer overflow pipes on the Mississippi River. With the Metro Plant up to standards, the next key step in cleaning up the Mississippi River is to figure out the best way to keep raw sewage from entering the river. The benefits from conveying all stormwater in the combined pipes to the Metro Plant for treatment would be very minimal. New filtering equipment at the plant could cost in the neighborhood of $150 million. In addition, much larger sewer pipes leading to the plant would need to be built. The raw sewage, on the other hand, is not only unsightly, but contains large amounts of disease -carrying bacteria, such as fecal coliforms and viruses. Separating the pipes that carry both sewage and storm water will remove these troublemakers from the Mississippi River. Minneapolis, St. Paul and South St. Paul began to separate their sewers long before the major upgrading of the Metro Plant began. Their pipes are very old, and were built by the cities at a time when the prevailing way to ntreat" wastewater was merely to dump it into rivers and lakes. Minneapolis has separated all but 13 percent and St. Paul 40 percent. As of 1982, Minneapolis had spent $85 million, and St. Paul $68 million, on separation. South St. Paul has separated o5 percent of its pipes at a $3 million cost to the city. At current spend-4-7 rates, it would take 25 years for the three cities to complete the separation. A five-year completion schedule financed solely by the three cities could bankrupt them. The Twin Cities add state have made ambitious, expensive add salutory efforts to maintain the quality of Minnesota's waters. Combined sewer overflows are an anachromsm in the face of this tradition. remove choices and options the metropolitan area might wish to pursue to solve the problem. ne eu ect oa sucn an action could be to halt construction of buildings of all types --new homes, new industry or new commercial developments affecting 66 cities and townships and about 80 percent of the Twin Cities Area's population. The action would hit the Twin Cities auburda particularly hard. It would bring downtown and neighborhood commercial and residential development to a halt. A court could impose a solution. This situation could occur after the permit is issued and if the three cities, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission or the Metropolitan Council do not met the permit schedules for ending the raw sewage discharge into the Mississippi River. Recently, the Milwaukee, Wisconsin area was token t0 Court over the quality of the area's discharges into Lake Michigan. Under a court -imposed plan, Milwaukee must spend a huge amount of money, $1.6 billion, to expand its wastewater storage and treament facilities. The state of Wisconsin went to court recently anklna for rnert rw'ew Ar rwo permits issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency which govern resolution of the Twin Cities combined sewer overflow problem. WHO WILL BENEFIT FROM THE SEPARATION PROGRAM? Separating the combined sewer pipes to end the practice of dumping raw sewage in the Mississippi River will help ameliorate a public health threat Posed by the fecal coliform and viruses that now enter the river via overflow outlets. What groups of people will benefit? Everyone along and downstream of the current outfalls: river users of all types, the three directly affected cities, the public and states downstream from the Twin Cities. Minnesota as a whole will benefit. Its 3reate3t river will be cleaner and more esthetic. Solving the combined sewer overflow problem removes a threat of state or federal sanctions or court -dictated answers that might be doubly expensive or impact the natural suburban growth and development of the Twin Cities Area. STEPS THAT NEED TO BE TAKEN Combined sewer overflow in the Metropolitan Area and inadequate wastewater treatment are two important water quality problems remaining in the state. There has not been enough federal and state funding to solve thos problems on ar. accelerated timetable. 1. The 1985 legislature needs to fund adequately the independent state construction grants program that was established by the 1984 legislature. The Program must include combined sewer overflow projects as grant -eligible. 2. The Coneresb needs to pass a new Clean Water Act that provides an appropriate federal share of the cost of further water quality improvements. These actions will, in turn, provide the necessary financing so the sewer separation program can be carried out rapidly and outstate communities can get on with improving their water quality. 3. Minneapolis, St. Paul, and South St. Paul need to complete their planning for sewer separations, which is currently under way. 4. The Metropolitan Council needs to amend its Water Resources Management Development Guide to include the separation projects. The changes are scheduled for early 1985. The Council also needs to give an earlier -than -planned go ahead to three regional sewer interceptor projects that are planned as part of the sewer separation solution. Estimated cost of the regional interceptors is about $20 mill -on. draft Oct 12 01222A POEDTI { i SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY January 7, 1985 uocx�xcl0" uconw cyan t oom"r„5 ,•DS"s.•�„e Mr. Tom Triplett, Director State Planning A encv 4 9 C cmD"n. xucxn 100 Capitol Square Building Dttr••a" 550 Cedar Street tux pout m•x• St. Paul, MN 55301 u<su•w wog. WIM.WD RE: Funding of Combined Sewer Separation x,51'4D1 ,••55 aon U.C. 9, . Dear Mr. Triplett: wsno „W1.0u I am writing to you on behalf the Suburban Rate Authar- .11Iw00D .x..1=. itv Board of Directors. At its October quarterly I.W. meeting, the Board reviewed the Metropolitan Council's w.?.S, ..x ,.1. sl run position aopr on the funding of ?ccele.ratpd combined P p w0"0 sewer separation. After considerable discussion, the wSID M510 lx Board directed the Chairman to take appropriate action tax,:m to indicate the Board's dissatisfaction with the SOSSw50•u SO$,.so concept of a state program P grant ro ram to finance accelerated p •xl.o". construction of the separation facilities, rnllnwin i.ua.ee •n that meetinq, the SRA Rxpcutive Committee and cnunse f.Orl•Aw have met with Metropolitan Council ntaf- On this s wlw000 L5:"a rut matter. MWxll wCSOr" wonp The BRA Board feels that it would inequitable to wnon.xD require those users who have alreadv paid for their own separated systpms to bear a substantial part of the cost of the accelerated separation earn' �rtion which appears to be necessary in the three nit The Board is pleased with the effort being cad., .0 solve the problem, and it recognizes that an accelerated program must be undertaken. If funding be.vond Oat which can be provided by the three affected cities is required, the Board feels that a loan program is far more appro- priate as a method of providing that fundina. We understand that this is one of the alternatives heirq considered and that the alternative nav require the payment of interpst by the state. It is my belief that the Board would iuprart thin alternativp The annual meeting of the BRA Board will he held on Wednesdav, January 16th, and at that tires the Board will consider what further action it ought to take on this matter, 2000 FIRST BANK NACE WEST • MINNERPOUS, MINNESOTA 55,07 • (617)7330543 Mr. Tom Triplett, Director Januar- 7, 1995 Page .. I am sure that you understand that there are some strong feelings on this subiect and it is m- hope that a bill which will have broad support will. be in- troduced. Very truly yours, Fred G. Moore Chairman FGM: rb SHHSC SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COUNC Bbominq,on a Eden Rai.,, a Edna a R<01 eld MINUTES OF THE SUBURBAN ENERGY TASK FORCE MEETING JANUARY 17, 1985 COUNCIL CHAMBERS - RICHFIELD CITY HALL The inaugural meetinr of the Suburban Energy Task Force meeting was convened at approximately 8:1. a.m. by Debbra Determan, Program Director, South Hennepin Human Services Council. Person; in attendance went around the table and introduced themselves and stated their affiliations (See attached participant list). A welcoming statement was presented by Ivan Ludeman, Richfield City Council member and representative of the city's Energy Advisory Committee. Mr. Ludeman presented a warm welcoming statement in which he stressed the importance of energy issues to persons in all walks of life and endeavors. OVERVIEW OF TASK FORCE OBJECTIVES An overview of Task Force objectives was presented by Eileen Moran, co -convener and Executive Director of the Northwest Human Services Council. Ms. Moran presented the objectives of the Task Force as being three -fold: 1) Coordination and information sharing in and among cities and between various energy programs. 2) Joint development of funding and programming ,...forts. 3) Review of low -incase housing and related issues. RICHFIELD ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAMS Steve Warn, Energy Coordinator for the City of Richfield, was the featured speaker on the energy programs available in Richfield. The city has had a Citizen's advieory Board for energy issues for the past 7-8 years, and thus, was a `.,rerunner in local planning on energy -related issues. Steve indicated that the Board has been fairly effective in addressing community needs. He stressed that it is extremely important to have a good under- standing of the city, such as its housing stock. The Richfield energy programs are packaged under the label, "Bundle Up Richfield". A big part of their effort is in public education, i.e., letting people know what is available. They have not conducted energy audits, but have contracted with other groups and organizations. They have aggressively prowled home energy loans. Steve indicated that promotion and marketing was the most difficult aspect of the program; it is closely tied into education. He suggested that anything o...... Inn a aln.,,n;nn,nn M.nneanu SS431 0 161218865530 Minutes of the Suburban Energy Task Force Meeting January 17, 1985 Page Two that seemed to work, they were willing to try. They are going to test a telemarketing approach within the next few weeks. The home improvement component of the program includes three parts: 1) Neighborhood Energy Workshops - Minnegasco is the current sponsoring organization. Y.E.S. was used to distribute promotional literature door-to-door. These workshops provide a good opportunity to advertise other energy services and programs. 2) Shared Savings Demonstration Project - This program is designed to reach moderate and upper income home owners. There are no up front costs; the homeowner pays only if a savings actually occurs as a result of the energy -related improvement. 3) The House Doctor Project - Currently funded by Minnegasco. This program is designed to assist those homeowners who fall through the cracks (Yon-EAP eligible). It is the most cost effective of the Richfield energy programs. Evaluation of the city's energy programs is currently conducted by the Minneapolis Energy Office. Steve indicated that coordination with thirty different groups and organizations is very complex. In regard to accessing funding. it was emphasized that there are funds available, along with in -kind support generally •rom the City. Steve stressed that it is extremely important to identify community needs, and then custon-tailor energy programming to reet those needs. CITY REPORTS V_ Bloomington - Alyse Osborn was in attendance representing the Bloomington HRA. She indicated that this city has no identifiable-rograms at this tiro. Energy irgrovements have been incorporated in ,me improvement loans. The biggest problem is with the high ir.teres' .dies. They have considered working with Richfield on energy issues. Eden Prairie - The City of Eder ,rairie was represented by Steve Durham of the City Planning Departmen 'e indicated eighty percent of the houses in Eden Prairie a,e les. thirteen years old. The City also has a relatively small percentag. senior citizens. He indicated that there is a need for pu'olic education as well as for looking at the energy efficiency of rectal yroperties and the needs of single reads of households. New Hope - Curt W, representing the City of New Hope, stated that his city also did not h, my programs. They primarily work with grants for low and moderate into... residents. He feels that there is a definite need for public information, as for weatherizition of multi -family units. Minutes of the Suburban Energy Task Force Meeting January 17. 1985 Page Three Hopkins - Hopkins was represented Mr. Kohman stated that he was not on this group, and that he would meeting to represent the ci:y. STATE ENERGY OFFICE by Ray Kohman, Chief Bu4'l-i'ng Inspector. the right person to .present the city suggest someone else attend the next Susan Moore attended the meeting as a representative of the State Energy Office. She indicated that the state energy code is a minimum standard, and the state office has encouraged builders to go beyond the code. Community energy grants are available from the State for the planning and implementation of energy projects. She stressed that it is extremely important to negotiate within local utilities in order to make use of CIP funding (Conservation Investment Program). It is imperative to get local government involved in this effort. There was substantial interest among those present regarding the Community Energy Grant Program, and it was decided to make this the focus of the next meeting. Susan indicated that she could rrrange for a speaker from the state office. West Hennepin agreed to serve as host for the next meeting on February 28. The meeting adjourned at approximately 9:30 a.m. Thomas J. Esser South Hennepin Human Services Council Recorder TJE:cp fj army! h9nnep1n human nrvlur planning board / 1100 vernon avenue youth, /t. foul/ pork, minne/ota $3416 ei! enn4pIa u1Nan 920-3333 A rY 1000 FEBie6 �u CCITY OF SUBURBAN ENERGY ISSUES TASK FORCE AGENDA FEBR'JARY 28, 1985 8:00 am to 9:30 an ST. LOUIS PARK CITY MALL COMMUNITY CONFERENCE ROOM SODS MINNETONKA BLVD. I. WELCOME/INTRODUCTIONS II. SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION n'I JANUARY 17th NEti.AG III. PRESENTATION OF DEED COMMUNITY ENERGY GRANT PROGRAM Pr'SENTER: Mark Schoen Daua; Kenager, Community Servicka Department of Energy and Economic Dev*IG;.xant VI. COMMON ISSUES AND STRATEGIES FOR COORDINATION V. ADJOURNMENT '-�t!f'F;l�!dHCF;['. t41.��t:;;'F•;L CUUI`!' F'l'.i;s AD'- I"•C)PY COMI,JTTEE Ml-i J A`at IAriY ' 1 , 1?9 Present : Ann Doerr Dorthea Fish J. Diann Goetten Mike Huger JoEl icr, Hurr Fs�ar h 1.:4•�s�rwes . tt?rn--gL Rer. tar Abaer,t:- Richas d Grav hti c_ I e-v Go I dm It,o [4,3b Ko i pt i -, Uot? 1'it!q��tcS i arb Peter ,.* lr 61 en Pay Tuni Riley H arik SPrwat Hr'PrID 5t:af f a Marty Jessrr Ile1) Bartel 9'a.v Ford {rtA. ret� ) Judy McDowell. Dun Fling 1`,, 1 A L ? ndbrer u � r r- t - mil/ RCGE RC! ! - T N FtMFaT: -_NI ...I-Ai-.E M I NNE7_..{-ATE C-APDE_NS Marty Jev-acan refer^r-J lie _owm ttee :..- tf's r--rsoarch crmpilcd b'v District ttaiT. ThL• regiearLh i.rt ucifd in op-nlitt�,un on thu entattr gardurns of the Lake WI.-InetC3oka. a -ea �:-r n Eddir Phc:lp.,. premier landstrapae rrc:hitact fu: they nt t-a Aur i-,m !.hc: year t. i'.'bi iak>pr+=xi mate'•',) . SrLr i f i.(: �;,t?ct2o.-is of the informat.l.:)n included: a f'zar l: ikl listA'nq C;;t.i e r'htalp=�-' c:li nts C� I?r::,L. pIi- Ii •.4opf'�;.' atld clement�s iric.car'purated into gar-dPrts L.i.st:inr� of pottential mnttioda irrcorpor-atinq these— into the. Nc;eronbov-G Ri ourap!iv of Phr• l PS 1? rast WayzJta ria!wd= article ft:'zturinq Ph*Ips ih, committee brnwr,eci thrrattah hookr, MI h!euer brought from the Arburu-tum c1•inal ing with urte.te q-t-"dens. Hcger also brought some of the working •films o-r f'ftclps that ir-,clt-tded drawirgt•, Ff,c\tvs, and notes concorned with flowers, architectural structures;, design, etc. The committee was i!tvitvd to look .:at thoup as wean av; photos of the Bell garden brought by Dor theat Fish. The conr,nit:c•v ,•,•aj :;l i de' pr-ovi dr(I by Mt 1'. Phel,ls that cJr-c.` ct od mod_ ).t.ic;naI gar der)F. F'hklpz.• had d;.AsAgnc:rd. C,LLR_F -L4 r _.QF;-88) 7471jc' OF:. THE CADE'N Jensen intraduc:ed Ray ford, ,gardener for the Noerenbergs for 52 years, and Prl a. l i ndberg , t:urr.Eint i-;CF'F:D staff ma.i. nteri ance at the Noe renbera garden. Jensen i ndj dated that th4ny we+rp here in rospon:�e to the commi t: tev ' s requesi: <,t the last mecti ng . L:4'. ndbe!r-c! gave i brief ac _ut. nt Of cctr-r ent oaeri,.-t i c ni, at the Uor dcrt, hi ghl i i,ht i nq thc. -Fol : owi i-q: c: The par- t. i cul ar• -flowers to be pl. artt�?J in the garden are 1 av,)cl nu. E�a:ch f al I f or the ( c; ! -)wi if surrirrtrr , I t r e:•nai r,s mti.:h t•th.,-. aarne as, trier; f:..y ror-d w:as in c:h::irge al.ttrc.,_t-gh new tlr"-, et. i ss of f1owL'r !: rna, V' lbe turd. F1c,IJE'r• bed'v .:rre :di.:;O JA d. U • Throe :ae,_t.isnnal sta f •f arse needcA + n mai r,t i- i n the gardvn . wor-ki.ng from mid--Apr•i 1 thr o!agh SL-ptembor. V Mr.,g.t visitors seem as interested in th'? history of the gord*n, family. etc. if, i:h,: Ljor dpit Staf t ct''-en, t.,3k:p time to t.:+lk: t 7i viritc.r. rpoar,!ir+a this. Ftar d F,ru i ='ed ':nr` t:c nmi ttiF?e with 40m,:.� hi motor i cal. r:,ar5pec i.:i'-F�: t.•r At. one ti'-iie, 7,r-60 pl,+rtty wi?ru- nraEd:�d ,r01- thl? wh c.` cover%:?d a CO C"at' t_'e al. mor'v .Area t halrl at P" resar.%. .111 pl .:irr'LS were r xti i:-o-1 An i hq c.sts.+t,-� grtne-- lC7uss airL:r',lra Fs thr-.. read. o A r zist: gc.rdpri was eoddwe-J ~•it!?r `•.he. 1-4,,r. a The -family traveled during the winter, often gathvi-jnq ido ,t, fr••r the ckarder. the a .zeto de ipri cam!_ i rou, Japan. When que-A.Aort d on .it!du hi., zzaw for tn:: fttture, Ford ind.catod th:•- f ul 1 owi rig g a Wai k:i ng pathr� or, the rtor•th -�;i de would greatly enhar.f: e visitor Miage and appreciation oT tho natural area: The lan(; near thr» ;:ktartrtel should be mown and c)rvE�lo�;c�t} moire as it has bt=t.:4) in the past. TF►E con►mi ttCAC di iac.usSk'd pr(tbl erns wi th t he c:henrtel ar oa and i nqui red what the co-:5t wauld he U-) employ un riiitw security. Jussen will check int.L, this for- the rie:A ateetirig. During thi di sr_ussi on of park:. oper rit i un_,, Jensen .also added that Di ctf Cray had states' his feeling that the cost to reconstruct the gazebo was too high and recommended that this pl -An be modi f i ed. .0 E; rqIr)TIcq Don Ki n( I j and Deb Cartels., Distr-irt- li.,nd-ic-ape ar-chil-ect.S., introchiced two schematics of the Naet-eriber-g gar-dcn. King conimunted that they wer-c- done in an attempt to lc)Lik: at. thcj site for rot­w, fresh ideas and to incorporate the concept of estate ga- dens as a theiim�. Four drawings were reviui.ied includin.-i. Lininted out natura) ci-f -e_-Iie garde.) ar-o". The-,- i i1cl tided aper, , Sun, I y 11­1.:,-,a­_. .. fcilst.ioi�I i shad t.,--vess , I olm -And wc` ar-c-,::,% , alid hi �jh Poi [Itt.;. v. lcirte)s c-on;(r!e7)t.c?d that fsevat:rit InUSt be cuniiii,Joirad for bcjti, p4:)-_;JA tive antf ne�,:.tive facto., 9 irt PI-Anniritj fu:- Gardon de,.cA,.)pim_,nt. 2. P!2t&n JaJI.__U:E,s Balr(Els pointed oust pateiiti;,)' �tsuiio for the i:,rw�vi list_!-ci above. For ex ample, 1;.,w, wel- areas cou.1.0 bce u,.ied for a natitral ci.- riort, ir.formal uzirdr;n ad-_ApUlblsa to th-A 'SitULttion; tr,eest;, furming a lxn:_, could be incarpor'-Aec. j.rito a woix1P-,j--kv (al lvy); --t high tooint ;4ic�-_:id be zi, goad spot fc-r t:-.L Visi !:,jr Clain- E M a L L Gar In this concept, the visit,_o, c ' crii.ei- wzDuld be a fwqtaph(r 4c.- %-to* "home" aric: would be visited fil c-,L. ["he woud then pirc—c-cr-a-d to the ft)i-rr..kl uard(nv ]v outs-Acjck -.JIL- cef-ter- #r-;.Anir_-ue-ud and then 1:-o morc; irifcrrriA, flatt.,_;al gar -dens, + us' at, . The v*- i j- t-t-)*r,- wal j I d follow a I c n q t 10 i rat: d i - "! v r- I r i t h e n iA rj arena that W01.11d give "glimpses" oT tht- carde.,.. Th* walk to the visitQi enter would on fi-rjm i-iForrral oardr,­i_:; tr- this mcir-rze r -. r m;-i I e r- s.- v a, r Si w of c one Some On trio =Ommittev li..ed the idc-a LJ a lonc-- windinq dri%re thrroutih the pardon. Hegur commentod that this dusign did not work particolarly wall at then Arbur-etuni. The LOMMittET �4&11e?'A1ly fL-Yt that the tchematiu:. had helped with thr?ir, Linder -standing of the .-ardar, and that they thought the plans: qcod. 1) j 5 t r i G: t staff will ou t I i i i E? A more :_.-+ �_-c i f Jo c: P r cic? t a no T ci, devU'l L p rjcr-:'_ wiLhiri the idvntif ied on the C-011LOpt plans :,,nd prepai-ci more if j U Site r I WIS. U'l-ut-11tati 0 a , Will be determined by Jesren -After talF,InLi to Vici,. Cray. February 15, 1985 FEB 9 1985 WEEK OF FEB. 18 - FEB. 22 NOTE: This publication contains a one -week list of meetings and agenda items for the Metropolitan Council, its standing committees and advisory committees, as well as similar information for the Regional Transit Board. It is mailed every Friday to a contact person in the region's local governments and to the Twin Cities media. Meetings and agendas occasionally must be changed. For this reason, anyone planning to attend meetings should verify the information in advance. Cali 291-6464 i.0 do so. Media shuuld cuntinue to Cali Ken Reddick, 291- 6422, or Lynna Williams, 291-65.1, for more information. Metropolitan Council Staff Meeting - Tuesday, Feb. 19, 9:30 a.m., Council Chambers. A report on the Council by the Office of the Legislative Auditor will be discussed. House Local and Urban Affairs Committee - Tuesday, Feb. 19, noon, Room 200, State office ui ding. Council Chair Sandra Gardebring will testjfy on the legislative auditor's report on the Council. Expanded Metropolitan Waste Management Advisory Committee - Tuesday, Feb. 19, 2 p.m., Council Chambers.— The committee will review the Council's solid waste actions and activities, and the solid waste guide hearing record. Aggregate Resources Advisory Committee - Tuesday, Feb. 19, 3:30 p.m., Conference Rooms C and D. The committee will considr the legislative charge requiring it to formulate a procedure for ideWt ying the degree of protection needed to ensure the long-term availability of aggregate resources. Metropolitan Systems Committee - Tuesday, Feb. 19, 3:30 p.m., Conference Room ittee will review the revised recreation open space capital improvement program for fiscal years 1986-87. It will also discuss transportation policy plan issues related to the light rail transit analysis. Regional Transit Board - Tuesday, Feb. 19, 4:30 p.m., Council Chambers. T{•.e board will hear a report from its Administration and Finance Committee reviewing the MTC tax anticipation bond issue, an amendment to the Strgar- Roscoe-Fausch Contract, and a financial statement. The board will also hear the report of the Committee of the Whole on transit improvements in the three corridors, and a report by the Policy Committee. Arts Advisory Board - Tuesday, Feb. 19, 5:15 p.m., Conference Room E. The board wil review the bidnnial plan. Minnesota Pollution_ Control Anenc�r_Solid _Waste Seminar - Wednesday, Feb. 2", 9:30 - 0: a.m., fhunderbfid Mote, Bloomington. Council Chair Sandra Gardebring will speak. Transportation an�Advisory Board - Wednesday, Feb. 20, 2 p.m., Council Chambers. The board wilj introduce new members and consider a proposed TIP amendment, and transit alternatives issues and recommendations. It will also hear reports from the Technical Advisory Committee, the FAU Committee and various agencies. Envfronmental Resources Committee - Wednesday, Feb. 20, 3 p.m., Conference Room E. The committee will review the solid waste policy plan hearing record. Governor's Taxicab Commission - Thursday, Feb. 21, 8 a.m. Conference Room E. Metropolitan a" Community Development Committee - Thursday, Feb. 21. 1:30 p.m., Council Chambers The committee will consider Abbott -Northwestern Hospital's proposal to purchase a magnetic resonance imager, applications for the NNFA multi -family market rate rental programs, and the city of St. M ary's Point comprehensive plan review. It will also discuss the environmental scanning process used in strategic planning. Metropolitan River Corridor Study Committee - Thursday, Feb. 21, 3 p.m., Conference Room Metropolitan Parks and Gocn Space Committee of the Whole - Thursday, Feb. 21, 6-8 p.m., Conference Rooi C. A ingAdvisor Committee - Friday, Feb. 22, 9 a.m., Council Chambers. The committee will make app tments of officers and subcommittee members, and hear an update on Stral. on Aging issues and staff reports on the program's work plans. 1. 2. 3. 4. AGE14DA MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT February 21, 1985 Wayzata City Hall 7:30 p.m. Call to order; present, absen* staff. ' FEB 9,2.E Reading and approval of ,ninutes of regular meeting of January 17, 1985. Approval or amendment of February 21, 19e5 agenda. Hearing of permit applications: A. 76-61 Lou Beasley - 53 foot lake setback variance, Sec. 136CA, 1774 Jones Lane, Harrison Bay, Lake Minnetonka. B. b4-1% Otto Associates - grading and drainage Pldn for "Harding Acres," an 18-lot residential subdivision, Sec. .33dC, Smithtown Road at Wedgewood, City of Shorewood. C. b5-U7 C. W. Freeman - 90 lineal feet of rip rap siiureline erosion protection, Sec. bDBA, southeastern shore of Lake Minnetonka, City of Chanhassen. U. 85-U8 Gary and Barbara Gengel - 60 foot setback variance, Sec. 17ABB, southeastern shoreline of Grays .lay, Lake Minnetonka, City of Minnetonka. E. b5-U9 Al Hilde, Jr. - grading and drainage plan for a proposed 4-lot subdivision, Sec. 20BDC, existing pond on the property ultimately drains to Gleason Lake, Ci'y of Piyinouth. F. b5-lU City of Richhfield - storm sewer system providing drainage for Richfield Bank property and the Market Plaza develuprnent, Sec. 27CB8, drainage to Richfield Lake, City of Kicnfield. G. b5-11 Bayview Homeowners - 96.5 lineal feet of rip rap shoreline erosion protection, Sec. 1AD, Smithtown Bay - Lake Minnetunka, City of Victoria. H. b5-12 James M. Miller - grading and drainage plan/till, Sec. 4DBA, southeast quadrant of tae proposed interchange of T.H.1l and Carlson Parkway, City of Minnetonka. I. b5-13 Burger Kind Corporation. - grading and drainage plan ter a fast food restaurant-, Sec. 21DCD, northeast quadrant cf Williston Road and T.H.7, City of Minnetonka. J. b5-15 Big Island Inc. c/o Thomas Judd - 112 lineal feet of rip rap shoreline erosion protection, Sec. 22DCN, City of Or rio, southern shoreline of Big Island, Echo Bay - Lake Minnetonka, City of Orono. K. 85-16 Harry and Diana Evert - 55 foot lake setback variance, Sec. 6CA, City of Victoria, south shore of Lake 1:arr�.ne, City of Victoria. L. �5-17 Hennepin Co. Dept. of Environment and i:neryy - mi.intenance dreoginy of 750 cubic yards in a 5U' x 400' area of Spray Island Channel, 300' of rip rap along sout}eastern snore of Seton Channel, lUU' of rip rap at ooth ends of Narrows channel, and 2UU+ of rip rap at born ends of Boy Scout Channel, 4 locations on Lake Minnetonka; Spray Island Channel, Seton Channel, Narrows Channel, and Boy Scout Channel. 5. Reports of Treasurer, Engineer and Attorney A. Treasurer's Report - Mr. Carroll. (1) Administrative Func. B. Engineer's Report - Mr. Panzer. C. Attorney's Report - Mr. MacoriDer. b. Uri tinisned ri.:siness. 7. New Business. b. Adjournment . UU7Zn MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT January 17, 1985 The regular meeting of the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District was called to order by Chairman Cochran at 7:35 p.m., on Thursday, January 17, 1985, at the St. Louis Park City Hall, St. Louis Park, Minnesota. Managers present: Andie, Carroll, Cochran, Lehman, McWethy, Spensley and Thomas Also present were Board advisors Panzer, Mahady and Macomber. Approval of Minutes The minutes of the special meeting of December 13, 1984 were reviewed. The Managers noted that a quorum of the Board was not present. It was moved by Spensley, seconded by Cochran, that the minutes of those proceedings be approved. Upon vote the motion carried. Tne Managers then reviewed the minutes of the regular meeting of December 20, 1984. It was moved by Lehman, seconded by Spensley, that the minutes be approved as distributed. Upon vote the motion carried. Tabling of Permit Applications The engineer recommended tabling the following permit applications until such time as all required exhibits have been received: 85-02 John Bierbaum, The Bellefonte Co. -'Town Square,% a 3.12 acre development consisting of a new bank, clinic, drug store and shops, Sec. 13CCB, east side of Hwy 110 between Church Street and Lynwood Blvd., Mound. 85-03 Palmer H. and Nancy J. Koosman - construction of a rock jetty for docking and boat storage purposes, Sec. 14CD, northern shore of Langdon Lake, Mound. It was moved by Spensley, seconded by Lehman, that the foregoing applications be tabled pending receipt of all required exhibits. Upon vote the motion carried. City of Minnetonka - recreational trail from Grays Bay dam to Crosby Road, Sec. 8D, Grays Bay Dam, Minnetonka. 84-92 The engineer reviewed the application of the City of Minnetonka for construction of a recreational trail from Grays Bay Dam to Crosby Road across the Grays Bay Dam weir and control structure. The engineer reported that the staff has reviewed methods to limit public access to the control structure and to safeguard the passage of pedestrian and bicycle traffic across the structure as proposed by the City. The engineer noted that commen',s Have been received from the Hennepin County Sheriff's Water P..'rol and the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, both of which support the fencing as proposed. The DNR Boat and Water Safety Division recommended a higher fence and a placement of warning signs around the perimeter. The engineer stated that comments are also to be delivered by the DNR Division of Waters and the Hennepin County Department of Environment and Energy. The Managers reviewed the proposal recommended by the engineer. The tanagers requested that the engineer revise the configuration at the upstream side of the structure to cause the fencing to be extended slightly lakeward of the shoreline to provide additional Barriers to access to the structure. The Managers further directed the fencing be installed to a height of six feet. Following discussion, it was moved by Carroll, seconded by Lehman, that the application be approved and that the District fund 5U per cent of the cost of material and labor for fence construction not to exceed $1,000, with the fence to be constructed as shown in the engineer's drawing with the following modificaticn: extend the fence further from the wingwalls along the shoreline and that the final fence height (42' to 72') be determined based on staff review of maintenance requirements. Gerald `loberman - boat ramp renovation, Sec. 27B, Tonka Bay Marina, Echo Bay, Tonka Bay. 85-01 The engineer reviewed the application for installation of a replacement boat ramp in the same location as an existing ramp. The engineer recommended approval upon the engineer's receipt and approval of a construction drawing of a typical cross-section of the ramp as recommended in the written memorandum ..le - of the engineer. It was moved by Thomas, seconded by Andre, that the application be approved as recommended by the engineer. Upon vote the motion carried. Bruce D. Grussing - placement of fill in a wetland for a driveway access to a proposed single family residence, Sec. 25ABB, wetland lying to the southwest of Carson Bay, Lake Minnetonka, north of Manor Road and west of Dyer Lane, Deephaven. 85-04 The engineer reviewed the application for wetland filling. The engineer advised that the applicant proposes coripensatory excavation at similar elevations and recommended issuance upon staff approval of hydrologic computations as set forth in the written memorandum. It was moved by Thomas, seconded t)y Andre, that the application be approved subject to the foregoing condition and subject to approval by the City of Deephaven. Upon vote the motion carried. B. T. Joint Venture c/o _Tucker Sheehy - grading and drainage plan for a 32-unit townhouse development, Sec. 35CBB, south of T.H. 12, west of Long Lake Cc,-k, Long Lake. 85-05 Tne engineer advised the managers that the application constitutes a continuation (Phases II and III) of a project appruveo under permit 84-15 issued by the Board in March 1984. The engineer reviewed the drainage of the site and recommended approval subject to conditions numbered one through five in his written memorandum. It was moved by Andre, seconded by Carroll, that the application be approved subject to the foregoing conditions. Upon vote the motion carried. Daniel E. Sicheneder - 50' setback variance, Sec. 18AAD, southwestern shore of West Arm Bay, Mound. 85-06 The engineer reviewed the application for a variance from the District's setback requirement. The engineer advised that the applicable setback in the City of Mound is 50 feet and the 5U foot setback conforms with existing building patterns. The engineer recommended approval upon receipt of a survey showing the OHWL of 929.4 as a reference for the 50' setback distance. It was moved by Andre, seconded by Lehman, that the application be approved subject to the foregoing conditions. Upon vote the motion carried. correspondence The Managers noted receipt of the following items of correspondence: 1. Minutes of the 509 Section Meeting of the Minnesota Associdtion of Watershed Districts, October 16, 1984, and Notice of Meeting January 29, 1985. -3- 2. Announcement of the Metropolitan Council's program entitled, 'The State of the Region', to be held January 30, 1985. 3. Notice from the Water Resources Board noting the expiration of the terms of Managers Lehman and Carroll on March 8, 1985. Treasurer's Report Treasurer Carroll distributed his monthly Treasurer's Report dated January 17, 1985. It was noted that on page six of eight the payment shown to the City of Mound is not in fact being made tnis month. The Treasurer agreed to discuss this matter with the accountant. Following review of the report and the funds availaole for investment and the status of the various project accounts of the District, it was moved by Andre, seconded by Thomas, that the Treasurer's Report dated January 17, 1985 be approved and the bills paid as set forth in that report. Upon vote the motion carried. City of Minneapolis/Creek Hydrologic Study Manager Carroll reported that he had had preliminary discussions with the staff at the City of Minneapolis regarding payment of the outstanding billing due from the City of Minneapolis. Upper Watershed Storage and Retention Project/Painter Creek Subwatershed The engineer reported that construction of Project No. 4 had commenced on January 9, 1985 in Painter Marsh. The engineer advised that the contractor would be sidecasting the dredged material and that sidecasting had been authorized by the Minnesota Department of Natural Nesources. The engineer distributed a proposed Change Order Number 1 to modify the contract documents to allow sidecasting and to modify the unit prices applicable to projects 2, 3, and 4. The engineer recommended approval of proposed Change Order No. 1. It was moved by Andre, seconded by Tnomas, that the Change Order de approved and executed on behalf of the District. Upon vote the motion carried. The engineer reported that the City Council of the City of Minnetrista has authorized access across the park property identified in the condemnation action as Parcel 25. The engineer identified the alternate route for access to Project No. 6, and advised that this change would permit the District to avoid using private property owned by Mr. John Wambecke for access to the pro3ect. The engineer advised the Board that easements over only four parcels will need to be submitted to the condemnation commissioners for determination of value. The engineer advised that hearings were scheduled to commence January 28, 1985. Water Maintenance and Repair Fund Project Status The engineer reviewed a memorandum dated January 10, 1985 regarding the status of various water maintenance and repair fund matters. The engineer reviewed the request of the City of Long Lake for payment of additional costs incurred by the City in constructing a sedimentation basin. The engineer explained that the amount of the additional request was $3,460 in addition to the $7,500 previously committed by the Board. Following discussion, it was moved by Andre, seconded by Carroll, that the $7,500 be approved for payment at this time and that the balance of $3,460 be hele and reviewed by the Board in connection with other requests for funding from the dater Maintenance and Repair Fund. Upon vote the motion carried. Project CP-e Creek Cndnnel Improvement City of Edina/Cascade Lane The engineer advised the Board that a contractor had commenced work on Project CP-8 approximately January 8, 1985, The engineer also informed the Board that a final contract has been signed with the Minnesota Department of Transportation whereby the Minnesota Department of Transportation would fund up to a maximum of S3U,000 of the pro)ect cost. Adiournment There being no further business to come before the regular meeting, Chairman Cochran declared the meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. U231n Respectfully submitted, John E. Thomas, Secretary -5- STATE OF MINNESOTA WATER RESOURCES BOARD L !6121 29E •.8/U 50U Lafayette RoadFirst F loor[e 15St. Paul, Minnesot,i CD f 55146January ?1, 1�?:45 Or OrcONC) TO: Persons Interested in Metropolitan tiurface Water- Management Metiopolitan Surface Water Mana Qcmf -it Act - Informational Mailine " :_' A question that continues to be raised about the Metropolitan Surface Wr?ter Management Act is: "Why is it necessary?" It is being asked mainly t,v communities in unorganized watersheds who don't see the need for spending pub:ic money to prepare watershed management plans in their areas. Is Watershed I'lanninq Needed" The need for sircnger local water management was debated at length when the proposal was brought before the Legislature in 1982. T110 main arguments supporting the bill were that serious surface water problems Mere occurring throughout the metro ar-e.i inat demanded local government action to correct, and that proper planning and manago ment practices could prevent these problems at less cast than corrective measures. '1 here certainty was no intent to require planning that �.ould not be cost effective in the long run. The requirement that plans initially be prepared on a wairrshed basis was included because runoff doesn't obey political boundaries. A downstream community has little control over the quantity and quality of runoff originating from communities upstream, unless an organization with watershed -wide authority is established. Metro communities have been confronted with varied surface water problems including: Floo,ling - Bassett Creek take Jane (dig Marine-liig Carnelian Lakes Fri(be Lake Chaska Creek Oneka Lake Prior Lake Coon Creek Lake Marion Minnehaha Creek Round Lake Informational Maihrig .1 Metropolitan Surface W,ilcr Manac.ent •nt 1tci Lake Degrad ition - Long Lake Lake Como McCarron's I :ike Sprin.g lake Silver Lake Hrosion/Sedimenianon - Elm Creek Mill fond Etter creek tanuary ; I, 1985 thge TWO Golden Lake Lake Riley 'twin Lakes Lake Rebecca Gleason Lake Battle Creek I'leasure Creek If local water management efforts are not stren4thened, there is no doubt that surface water problems will increase as more development takes place in the metro area. The Metropolitan Council's projected population 4routh rate for the metropolitan are from I980-2OCK) is 11 .4 'b. 1 his figure is deceptive, because signifi•. out development can occur with Itttle or no increase in population. The Council's 1984 report Twin Cit;rs Recent Urowth Trends and Pros ep cts stated that: "What this means in terms of growth is that despite very modest population increases, we still experienced con- siderable development - new homes built and new jobs created. Although population only grew by six percent in the 1970's in the metropolitan area, the number of households went up "16 percent, and jobs grew by :: percent. Su,-h growth was necessary to house and employ the growing numbers of baby boomers reaching adulthood." The attached maps show those communities projected to have population increases between the years 1980 and AW of 40 - ;o,4 and over W0:; and communities projected to grow in population by Liver 4,000 residents between 1980 and AW. Watersheds containing these fast-growing communities have the greatest immediate need for surface water planning. lhey will also need to (to more detailed planning than the urbanized and the rural watersheds. A well-done watershed plan will give communities a good understanding of the effects projected development and larul use will have on surface watc r systems. In formulating water management strategies, local officials will W. 40A.; Informational Mailing i. 2 January 31, 19,85 Metropolitan 'Aurface Water Management Act I'age Three have to weigh the costs of controls needed to prevent problems versus the costs of correcting problems after -the -fact. Communil.ics that have dealt with serious surface water problems have found corrective projects to be extremely expensive. Enactment of the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act reflected a strong concern over proper water management and legislative confidence that local officials would do a good job in implementing the Act with mintmai oversight. if communities do not make a Rood faith effort to accomplish the purposes of the Act. it is possible that the Legislature will be asked to expand the role of regional or state government in land use zoning, regulation of development. and water management in general. Attach. (I.hies and 1 owns Wi+h Projected Fopulation Gains Between 40 - rAV, From 1980 - 2000 Cities and With ®Projected Fo�Iulation Gains Greater Than 50% From 1 ck8) - 2000 1 , 1 s•.ro. �IIIIIIIIIIII!!!I!!i!!!�!!I{1!' ill i • I�l;lli{iilii!��•�' `'��'►'� hill Iq�� �t IIIIIIII ..� oN Co .1 7• I + � J I ol.nw•cl p1• o Iv ( �.)� �Irll of •o N` rll rlw t•11 wl 11.,1.• ..Ile.• Ir ION\ �b r•T I.Y. 1 L 1,•.0 I .o.i(•t1Y1 (Dr . ON aI I�Gwr, '�I'•r �• .1• l IL ( w r�•, ..I IU., I, I D.;.a te• 1•`I. G•O• CARVI[R C t•.,• nc.n \I cn„•u c.o. ;(•. ••.•• L--- } -- - - -- - --- 7D c. Co j�. sill � .•. •.,rM ! I r .11 ,.• • �•H,uLI ( ! .e..c ti —r -- — - -- -- —— *D• __f _ WU 1 Ir L_—_ �� :r•(r I y•c:(•[ I I.ISr ))Nf•Nt ( v,•1 U •S..w ! �, I ••.1• AW I q.r•N rp• ! ,l ,..•l„11 I 1, -V75 t 1 el••111• , ,rill .I i.l ('' � .•,• I tP•l. •. t (: rI[•.. ,. I` U„j • I'.f f --' 10 If_—_�_--7�w�e�1 .-1 .[ Iw.rt •.r• TWIN CITIES METROPOLITAN AREA Political Boundaries,1984 1 1.b./ I . . . • .eYO• I /.I90. •..0 11 » N. U•1 7 0.0.0 10 Is"O'l \e.Il le .1.9e1. w NOI.YeM �•�( 1 •u•,t0•u Hn• 11 NN.a (....... le...►... I, ..1) 0tI. !!Ls -A — Countj Boundary . re•....r Is e / sell, )O L01•:10.D » e.1.00. 1, 01'" a, ueV •u » .u,nNl geN Municipal Bouno&ty . c.u.•o+. 1e 101Oer. rlrl.•u 81 t.ueNe w e.e ..0 •. G.•, r.rlJ •• _ Township / •....../ 1s .1 a.,reer i) Mel t.Nea, It %.:1,..9 v.u, — — _ { Bounda[ • .r( I../ I.•I 1&,.YN. e.,0 to .•. •e.1., a ►I ...I , •I,.• Cities With Projected gains Grcalrr ' ®Population T ha n 4.000 From 1980 - 2000 - ]fill--- , Ca r•rl•rr 10 1r 1••1 i. f '.. •. I I ul � nuf C r � ffi3t _ .__ L I rUGO r•�O�t• t,•,l, r,•,,_ W MIN ON G•l urn\ to•I o•.. uo• � _co-- p I for II rr•r. � 1J c•n r1 «.• ytq{wrrle re 1 NENNEV I I uoc 1�. l(r�- \ •t )yt0)I IQlO•I it sl•\ ]1 01. i! I ql Il 1 I •( I DI r1.On[1 /,, o'� to Ir1'I J- vp _ -_ •T _ - of •1 r.; orow RAMSf CO I I o•1 •1 Y1 IIN/N 1 •' I fl lCv�\ l:%-y .r r•uL l I-1 1 r•.. I rA • u.rf —.I - _ w•fl •r t I I 19 Is, 1 r- ee.l••t1Y► ---� It, � r•Yl lr � --�I °• YI ' I Jaen t r.lu. 1 1rcr11 1 •rto•.• I � CARVER C tr•1• U(n.•... yr I ,•G t • - ti I — ee5treyel w•�'•:Sr • I r ,,, . l i� II II �' y ..IruGl G fi rT •.1 l l 1 Il_ I .• ...Weil te. I •I w:U,O• , 1 )1 l•N t.(11 Noe.. I• I I t I 1 ( 1 I I I „ • r • I el ••(It• 1 !tilt .\•irl rill,.• i 111a ... t•yt\I • • r Yn 1 • \l1 •1• I i ... e,.r ID Is TWIN CITIES METROPOLITAN AREA Political Boundaries,1984 1 Ir.i.L rr•• • YOY.e •1e•.•lNe. e1Krr1 e1Y \••t 7 0•0•0 10•e�.fe•1lf J»»I 1 11 /Ou` —1 ...• le Counly Boundary . 1o.r• 1•r I) : 1 r1r1 JO L 1• t1�'. t !e e••rl,•1 5 nt1,1•e• a r,\19r J1 l••«.r, » en,1.../ j-'O'O Municipal Boundary e L•II..eM 1• (Ol Yr1•r .I�. rrl ): NIIee00 !0 «• rr•• r/.Lr'1 .ees•... N •r .. r.e.. JI 01.1 uc.Ll ,1 u•1. •.e I+wO, e r10 t•.1 \•rl I. \•rN •o•,1 J• w••,er•o 1) /t .•r• 1 •oi. -- - - - Township BCNndafy NEWS RELEASE From: Freshwater Society Navarre, Minnesota Contact: Paula Ripley Telephone: 471-8407 FEB ? n 1985 i CITY F RELEASE: I , All Lake Minnetonka Editions Date: February 15, 1985 LAKE MINNETONKA WATER QUALITY PROGRAM The use of copper sulfate in Lake Minnetonka, the impact of sewage diversion projects and comparisons of past and present water quality will be some of the topics addressed at a seminar to be held Tuesday, March 5, 7:30-9:30 p.m. at the Gray Freshwater Biological Institute. The program, "A Historical View of Water Quality in Lake Minnetonka," is sponsored by the Institute, the Freshwater Society and co -sponsored with the Minnetonka, Orono, Wayzata and Westonka Community Services/Education Departments. Dr. Edward Swain of the Institute will discuss water quality data in 1982 ak v4wlpx;,Qd to data from 1969, focusing on the impact of the sewage diversion projects al the lake initiated and completed during that time and their effect on water quality• and lake ecology. Dr. Swain will also discuss water quality in areas such as West Arm and Jennings Bay, where sewage diversions are under consideration, but not completed. Dr. Swain will also discuss the pros and cons of the use of copper sulfate based on the 3-year, $200,000 study he is conducting on Lake Minnetonka to study the effects of copper sulfate, including its impact on algae and other animals, the residual effectiveness of such treatments and the impacts on water quality. His study, "The Effects of Copper Sulfate on Lakes," funded by the Freshwater Foundation and the State of Minnesota, may serve as a model to predict how lakes (more) react to the use of copper sulfate. a chemical used primarily to control algal populations in freshwater lakes. Dr. Swain has also been cooperating in a project with the Limnological Research Center at the University of Minnesota to determine the history of Lake Minnetonka utilizing sediment analysis and dating. Dr. Swain will discuss the history of manes activities around Lake Minnetonka as recorded in the bottom sediments lain down year after year. The study of lake sediments, paleolimnology, can help determine events that changed the water quality of the lake during the past 1500 years. Dr. Swain received a B.A. in 1974 from Carleton College in Northfield. Minnesota, and a Ph.D. in ecology from the University of Minnesota in 1984. He has been extensively involved in sediment studies of lakes in Vermont, Hawaii, Northern Minnesota and the Twin Cities. Time will be available during the program for the audience to ask specific questions. Cost is $2.00, payable at the door. The Gray Freshwater Biological Institute, part of the College of Biological Sciences at the University of Minnesota, is located at the intersection of County Roads 015 and 019 in Navarre. * a � Boy Scout MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD CY' MANAGERS P. O. BOX 387 WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 PERMIT APPLICATION - PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT DNR PA NO. DATE RECEIVED APPROVAL DATE YES NO DATE INSPECTED APPLICANT NAME Hennepin County__TEL. 935-3381 ADDRESS 320 Washington Ave. Hopkins MN bbJU APPLIED TO [city, Orono DATE PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING: 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION SE 1/4 of the S 1/2 Section 8 Township 117-Ranae23 2. BODY OF WATER Lake Minnetonka 3. DESCRIBE WORK 6 OBJECTIVES • For dredging permits describe proposed m,thod of excavaticn and erosion/siltation control and proposed location of spoil disposal. • For ground water withdrawal give number, location and depth of proposed wells and estimated gallons annual use. _ Place ripra2 along apDrox 200' of this channel to protect the ants from further erosion 4. EARTHWORK DIMENSIONS (FEET) NA 5. EAR FWORK VOLUME (CUBIC YARDS) NA 6. ATTACH DRAV,'INGS SHOWING PRESENT CONDIT10NS i PROPOSED CHANGES All maps must show: • scale • government land lines and property boundaries • topography (two -foot contour intervals) using sea level • a plan of proposed improvements datum * locations of soundings and soil borings Cross sections must show: • water and land profile showing highest ;mown water level • soil types • construction details SIGNEDDATE ` Narrows Channel MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS P. O. BOX 387 WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 PERMIT APPLICATION - PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT DNR PA NO. APPROVAL DATE YES NO APPLICANT NAIME F ADDRESS n noun Hgokins, MN 55343 DATE RECEIVED DATE INSPECTED TEL. 935-3381 APPLIED TO (city, uil.lage,_.tnvnj Orono-Tonka Bay DATE PROPOSES THE. FOLLOWING: 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION E & W ]f4 N 112 Section 21-Township 117 Range 23 2. BODY OF WATER Lake Minnetonka _ 3. DESCRIBE WORK i OBJECTIVES • For dredging permits describe proposed method of excavaticn and erosion/siltation control and proposed location of spoil disposal. • For ground water withdrawal give number, location and depth of proposed wells and estimated gallons annual use. Place riprao along aoorox 100 ft at the ends of this channel for shoreline protection 4. EART:"FORK DIMENSIONS (FEET) NA 5. EARTFWC.%i. VOLUI-It (CUBIC YARDS) NA 6. ATTACH DRAWINGS SHO14ING PRESENT CONDITIONS i PROPOSED CHANGES All maps must show: * scale • government land lines and property boundaries • topography (two -foot contour intervals) using sea level • a plan of proposed improvements datum • locations of soundings and soil borings Cross sections must show: • water and land profile showing highest known water level • soil types • construction detail SIGNED`/ DATE k 25' 2 5' Evk- )i ('71.) G-3.4 2 5' -d NARROWS CHANNEL (not to scale) North Total riprap : 100' BOY SCOUT CHANNEL (nd to "41110 Total rW*p 2OW MARRELD INVESTMENT COMPANY 7841 Wayzata Blvd. • Minneapolis, MN 55426 • Phone (612) 545-1716 February 13, 1985 City Council City of Orono Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear City Council Persons: FEB 2 '014 1995 mo j1 (9c 0 tiV �N, `l FEB 1 5 1985 I am concerned with your approach in paying for sewer in the Crystal Bay area. I do not think it is right for the City at large to subsidize home owners in this area for their sewer system. Who is to say whether they are more able to pay than another person in the City for a sewer or, for that matter, roads or other public improvements? When I received sewer, nobody helped mel I did not go the the City at large to help me pay for my sewer. The City should not guess as to which home owner can only afford an improvement and then arbitrarily charge that owner a percentage of the cost based on the City's opinion. How about other people in the City that get improvements in areas where you, the City Council, think that the people in that area can't afford them? Certainly, there are lower income families in other parts of the City who you, in your best judgement, feel should not pay their fair share of public improvements. Do you intend to put all improvements on an advalorem basis? Do you intend just to put improvements on lower income homes on advalorem? Will you cancel my sewer assessments if my income drops and put in it on advalorem? I do not wish to subsidize Improvements in other parts of the City. I believe 1t is unfair (unconstitutional?) for you to charge me for my own sewer and then again charge me for a part of somebody else's sewer. City Council February 13, 1985 Page Two Please reconsider your position on Crystal Bay and charge that area in the same way that you have charged for sewers in the past. Very truly yours, MARFIELD INVESTMENTS Samuel S. Marfield ` 2455 Scotch Pine Lane Orono, MN 55391 Phone: 473-3344 SSM:kms n DEPARTMENT OF ENVIROWLINT A ,Z) ENERGY : •��� ` 320 Washington Av. South ' HENNEP!N � 8468 Hopkins, Minnesota 5`c )34, •. LIU 935-3381 TTY-935-6433 January 30, 1965 Mr. Walter Benson, Administrator City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Benson: Yennepin County is in the process of applying for a permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to do lake improvement maintenance work at Boy Smut Br. and the Narrows Channel. The work involved at these sites will be the placing of riprap. A copy of the permit application to the Watershed District and a site plan is enclosed. If you have any questions, please contact us. Sincerely, Edward Mcnteleone Principal Environmentalist DI/sn Enclosure HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT W . 278 HELD ON MONDAY, JANUARY 28, 1985 LCY�O 7 3 Uj O!jo ."a The regular meeting of the School Board of Independent School District #278 was held on Monday, January 28, 1985. Present: Dave McKown James Franklin James Seiter Don Anderson William Levering William Fenholt Kitty Crosby Reuben Palm UPON MOTION by Reuben Palm, seconded by Jim Franklin, the minutes of the January 14, 1985 regular meeting were approved as presented. Jinn Seiter informed the Board of the tn'iuwing items which are currently under consideration by AMSD: (1) Bill advocating that school be held between labor Day and Memorial Day; (2) School for the Arts; and (3) PELRA changes regarding length of effective dates of the contract. Mr. Seiter stated that if any of the Board numbers had input in these areas they should let him know or conr_\,;t Reuben Palm. Mr. Seiter commented on the selection of Gary Severtson, high school science teacher, to participate in a physics program to be held this summer which is sponsored by the National Science Foundation. The District has been requested to cooperate in the funding for Mr. Severtson's participation in this program. Mr. Seiter stated that this is an excellent opportunity for Mr. Severtson and also is beneficial for the physics department. Action will be taken on this item at the February 11, 1985 Board meeting. Jim Franklin reported on the Parent Meet i Confer meeting held on January 21, 1985. Areas of concern were: (1) school calendar; (2) legislation regarding juvenile code revision; (3) kindergarten scheduling; and (4) curriculum development input from parents. Kitty Crosby expressed appreciation to those people in the community who had contributed to the Scholarship Fund. Roger Meyer presented a check for $300 to the S0ool District on behalf of the Orono Wrestling Boosters. The money is to be applied to the purchase of a mat for the Varsity wrestling program. Don Anderson MOVED, Bill Levering seconded, acceptance of this contribution to the District. The Board expressed appre- ciation and thanks to the Orono Wrestling Boosters for this contribution. Dave McKown called on Ron Gilbert for a progress report from the math curriculum writing team. Mr. Gilbert provided a summary of the revisions, improvements, additions, etc. that are being incorporated. Development of basic skills, needs of the gifted and talented, problem solving and application of mathematical skills in the technological field, primarily utilization of computers and calcu- lators, are the main areas that have been addressed. Members of the writing team were present in order to answer questions from the Board. Discussion ensued with regard to uniformity of math format, transition between grade levels, communication with parents regarding the writing of curriculum, and the opportunity for input. Mr. Gilbert stated i,hzt a rough draft of the math curriculum was available in the District Office fof the Board's perusal. The committee would appreciate suggestions or questions from the Board within the next couple of weeks. After that time they will proceed with the final draft which will be brought back to the Board in March or April for final approval. Dave McKown expressed appreciation to the committee for their work on the math curriculum. Ron Gilbert provided the Board with a list of equipment needed for the enhan- cement and refurbishing of technological education at the Orono Schools. Mr. Gilbert stated that in years past the Board had supported the concept of tech- nological education and the application of various technologies within the edu- cational program. Teacher representatives from each building were present and explained the various needs at each grade level. Concerns expressed were: the need for a program to be developed for the refurbishing of present equipment; the necessity for increased numbers of computers at all levels; the need for more software packages; and maintenance of hardware. After a lengthy discussion, Mr. Fenholt stated that budget finalizations should be available within the month and after that time the Board would then be able to define more clearly the District's financial capability in meeting the needs stated in the plan. The Board expressed concern and a strong desire to do all they can to continue the excellent program now available at Orono. UPON MOTION by Bill Levering, seconded by Kitty Crosby, the plans for the Gifted and Talented Program were approved as follows: 1. The recommendations contained in the letter from OCGT officers dated December 10, 1984, to the Orono Superintendent of Schools shall be used as a guide in the development of long range planning for the Gifted and Talented Program. 2. Adoption of the proposal for in-service curriculum writing for 1985 as presented by the gifted/talented coordinator. Funding of approximately $1,600 will come from the District Inservice Training Budget. 3. The need for released time elementary G/T adjunct teacher will be con- sidered for 1985-86 if, as expected, more state funding of gifted/talented programs becomes available. 4. Gifted/talented coordinator authorized to investigate the possibility of participation in Wayzata strings program for certain talented music students. 5. Approved request for funding from the Orono Education Fund to send four teachers and the gifted/talented coordinator to the first Midwest Institute for Advanced Gifted Studies, which will be held this summer at the College of St. Thomas. (Granting of this request by the Orono Education Fund will depend on availability of funds). 2 UPON MOTION by Bill Levering, seconded by Jim Franklin, David North was hired as the Head Co-ed Track Coach for the 1984-85 school year. UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Bill Levering, the request by Zoe Ann Palmer to reduce her position as middle school librarian to 50% time in 1985-86 was approved. Karen and Jim Schleisman expressed concern to the Board regarding homework over vacation periods. Their h:sic -equest was that vacation time be free of homework. Dave McKown expressed appreciation to Karen and Jim Schleisman for their presen- tation. Mr. McKown stated that this information will be relayed to the staff and he also requested that each principal provide a written opinion on this subject to the Board for clarification purposes. UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Jim Franklin, Susan Vest's request for a five year leave of absence was denied. Bill Levering stated that he hoped Mrs. Vest realized that this decision of the Board was not a reflection on her contribution to the Orono Schools but that the Board needed to act according to the language of the Master Contract with regard to fulfillment of the clause on sabbatical leaves. UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Bill '.evering, Marren Gilbertson's request for a five year teacher mobility leave of absence was granted. Discussion was held with regard to cooperating with Maple Plain in the develop- ment of their recreational facilities. The Bo-,rd requested administration to obtain further written clarification from the attorney as to specific par- ticipation of the District in this project. UPON MOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by Kitty Crosby, the bills as covered by vouchers 047173 through 047230 (checks 046422 through 047172 are manual checks) and 045898 through 045950 wera approved as presented. UPON MOTION by Reuben Palm, seconded by Jim Franklin, the Activity Fund Report for 1st and 2nd quarters of the 1984-85 school year was approved as presented. UPON MOTION by Bill Levering, seconded by Jim Franklin, the meeting was adjourned. r ;tat�AerneP. Crosby, Clerk Approved: / Nave McKown, ha rmnan 3 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Orono City Council FROM: Thomas J. Radio, City Attorney RE: 1290 Spruce Place Lot 4, Block 19, Saga Hill Revised DATE: Feuruary 19, 1985 FACTUAL BACKGROUND Tne above property has been involved in a hazardous building action initiated by the City, since July 13, 1983. The contract for deed holder, James Archer, responded to the City's action and the case became a matter for protracted litigation. On January 7, 1984, the above -cited property became the property of t,e State, due to tax forfeiture. Tne owner had from January 7, 1903, to January 7, 1984, to redeem the property. As no redemption was completed, the State now owns the land, with control vested with the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Dennis Morris from the County Department of Taxation has informed us that because the lake frontage of the Archer property is exactly 50 feet, the DNR could allow the sale of this to the City. Mr. Morris has prepared a resolution for the County Board requesting the DNR to release the Archer property for sale. The Board will make a decision on the resolution March 12, 1985. unce the County votes their approval, the resolution will De sent to the DNR for approval or denial, as to releasing the property for sale. Mr. Morris said the DNR process may take a muntn ur more. If the DNR approves the sale of the land, the County will send notice of the DNR's decision to the City. The County will also ask the City whether the property should go up for public sale. The City may, at this point, approve a public sale and turther specify whether the sale should be open or restricted to the adjacent land owners. Mr. Morris felt that due to the number of procedures involved, any final public sale might not take place until September or October of this year. i{ ' r s lft*, I Feuruary 19, 1985 Page 2 Accordingly, if the City were to raze the structure and rid the neighDornood of the hazardous building, it could recoup its initial expense one of two ways: 1. Purchase the land from the DNR with an appropriate deduction for the razing cost from the purchase price. If the City wishes to purchase the land from the DNR, it should request the Park Commission to review the potential of the land for park and/or recreational purposes. 2. The City could sell the land at a public sale and levy an assessment on the property. The City may also recommend that the County Board pass along to the DNR, any restrictions or conditions the City may want to impose upon the land, such as restricting the sale to owners of adjoining land. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1) The house should be razed as it presents a hazard to the public health, safety and welfare. 2) The Council should uecide whether the land should be purchased for park purposes, or placed for public sale. 3) If the Council wishes a public sale of the land, it should decide what, if any, conditions should be imposed upon the sale. cc: John Gerharason, Puolic Works Coordinator Thomas Jacobs, Builaing Inspector 4947f MINUTES OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY January 16, 1985 FEB 1 J l985 ill Y0 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the annual meeting of the Suburban Rate authority was held at the Ambassador Motor Hotel, in the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, on Wednesday, January 16, 1985, commencing at 6:30 p.m. 1. Call to Order: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, Fred Moore. 2. Roll Call: Upon roll call, attendance was found to be as follows: Brooklyn Park Graydon R. Boeck Champlin Harlan Isom Columbia Heights Arden Hovland Deephaven William D. Schoell Edina J. N. Dalen John Wallin Excelsior Charles Thomson John Frohrip Fridley Edward Hamernik Greenwood William D. Schoell Hastings Gary E. Brown Maplewood John C. Greavu Idinnetonka Robert DeGhetto Minnetrista Charlotte Paterson New Brighton Henry Sinda North St. Paul Glenn Anderson Plymouth Frederick Noore Richfield Don Hassenstab F,t. Louis Park Larry Mitchell Shakopee John K. Anderson Shorev:.ew David P. McGraw Spring Park Patricia Osmonson Wayzata Allan Orsen Also in attendance were SRA attorneys Clayton LeFevere and Glenn Purdue. 3. Approval of Minutes: The minutes of the quarterly meeting of October 17, 984, were presented for approval as mailed. It was moved by Mr. Greavu. seconded by Mr. DeGhetto, that the minutes as submitted be approved. Carried unanimously. 4. Election of Officers: The Chairman indicated that he had requested the Executive Committee to serve as a nominating committee and that the Executive Committee had nominated the following persons for the following offices: Graydon R. Boeck James K. Spore J. N. Dalen Gary E. Brown John C. Greavu David P. McGr iw Frederick Moore Chairman Vice -Chairman Secretary -Treasurer Executive Committee Member Executive Committee MMember. Executive Committee Member Executive Committee Member The Chairman explained that the Executive Committee was making these nominations having in mind securing geographic distribu- tion, continuity as well as new participation on the Executive Committee, and degree of interest and activity in the organiza- tion. The Chairman called for other nominations. There being none, it was moved by Mr. Schoell, seconded by Mr. Sinda, that the nominations be closed and that a unanimous ballot be cast for the nominees. Carried unanimously. Whereupon the Chairman announced that all the nominees were elected to the offices for which they had been nominated. 5. Secretary -Treasurer's Report: Secretary - Treasurer Dalen presented a written financial report for the calendar year ended December 31, 1984. (A copy is attached to these minutes.) The report showed a cash balance of $1,756.44 and investments having a cost of $28,486.80 and a face value of $30,000. The report also disclosed the status of payments of annual assessments by members showing $36,931.50 as paid and $3,804.10 as unpaid for the year 1984. He indicated that a follow-up would be done on the several unpaid accounts and expressed satisfaction in the general record of payment by the other communities. It was moved by Mr. Greavu, seconded by Mr. Hamernik to accept the secretary - treasurer's report. Carried unanimously. 6. Report of Chairman: Chairman Moore reported on meetings which had been held by the Executive Committee on the matter of combined sewer overflows (CSO's) of the cities of Minneapolis, St. Paul and So. St. Paul. He indicated that a meeting was held with Mr. Harrington of the Metropolitan Council staff and that possible financing alternatives were explored. He indicated that the Executive Committee met, thereafter, and determined to give tentative support to a proposal which would provide a state subsidy for approximately one-half of the interest on the indebtedness to be incurred in accomplishing storm -sanitary sewer separation in the three cities. He indicated that there was opposition, within the Executive Committee, to outright grants to pay the construction costs on the storm -sanitary sewer separation. -2- The Chairman called on Glenn Purdue to report further on this matter. Mr. Purdue distributed a memorandum to the board stating background and recent developments, and recommending action by the membership. (A copy of that memorandum is attached to these minutes.) He then provided an oral summary. Mr. DeGhettc reported that Minnetonka had also expressed its position in opposition to grants and in favor of a partial interest subsidy. Mr. Brown reported that Hastings had taken similar action and had contacted its local legislators to explain its position. After discussion, it was moved by tor. Boeck, seconded by Mr. Dalen, that the following resolution be adopted: RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the SRA supports the accelerated construction of separation facilities as may be necessary because of state and federal action. In the event that the cities of Minneapolis, St. Paul and So. St. Paul are not themselves able, because of financial restraints, to fund such construction within the next ten years, the Board supports the concept of a state -subsidized loan program, the subsidy not being greater than one-half of the interest cost of bonds issued to finance con- struction. The Board opposes a grant beyond this amount. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this reso- lution be sent to all members of the Metropolitar Council,to all metropolitan legislators, and to the Governor. Carried unanimously. The Chairman further reported that in November letters were sent to a number of communities in the metropolitan area inviting them to become members of the Suburban Rate Authority and to join in the common efforts being made by the SRA members. He indicated that individual members of the board may soon be asked to contact neighboring communities as a follow-up to this membership effort. 7, Claims: Secretary -Treasurer Dalen presented the claim of the SRA attorneys for administrative and legal services as follows: -3- General: Legal. Fees: $ 2,677.50 Disbursements: $ 866.91 MWCC Administration Review: Legal Fees: . $ 1,102.50 Disbursements: $ 87.70 Northwestern Bell: Legal Fees: $ 875.00 Membership Data: Legal Fees: $ 257.50 CSO (Combined Sewer Overflow): Legal Fees: $ 70.00 Disbursements: $ 25.95 Pumping Rate-Municipal/NSP: Legal Fees: $ 17.50 Franch i so Legal Fees: $ 122.50 It was moved by Mr. Greavu, seconded by Mr. Hamernik that the foregoing claim be paid. Carried unanimously. 8. Attorney's Report on Electric Franchises: Glenn Purdue reported that a questionnaire had been sent out to SRA members inquiring about the status of their franchises with the electric utilities serving them. He reported that 16 members had responded and gave a summary of the status of their franchises. He indicated that he expects efforts to be resumed in the near future to negotiate a proposed uniform electric franchise. He solicited suggestions from SW, members as to matters which they regard as of primary concern to them in their electric franchises. He indicated that Fred Moore of Plymouth, Fran Hoffman of Edina and Graydon Boeck of Brooklyn Park had agreed to serve as members of a negotiating committee to assist in the development of a proposed uniform franchise. -4- 9. Report :,a Status of Administrative Review: Clayton LeFevere reported that in 1983 Governor Perpich appointed a commission chaired by John Boland, former Metropolitan Council chairman, to study the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, its organization and its operating practices and procedures. The Boland Commission report was i-sued in late 1983. Among its recommendations was a recommendation that a professional management study of the MWCC be conducted. The SRA and other interested organizations urged the creation of an independent, broadly -representative committee to assist in (a) defining the scope of any such management study, (b) selecting the organization to make the study and (c) monitoring the progress and final results of the study. This recommendation was adopted and James Spore was appointed as a member of this advisory committee at the suggestion of the Suburban Rate Authority. The 1.111CC authorized the management study and the advisory committee proceeded to define the scope of the study and recommend the firm to make the study. The accounting firm of Touche Ross & Company was selected and is currently involved in makinq its study. Early in its work it requested the assistance of the SRA in obtaining information from its member municipalities about their perceptions of the MWCC. In response to this request the SRA submitted a questionnaire to its members and trans- mitted the responses back to Touche Ross. Mr. LeFevere reported that Mr. Spore had expressed satisfaction with the way the study is proceeding. 10. Designation of Auditor: Mr. Dalen recommended that the board of directors designate the George ft. Hanson Company as auditors to review the SRA's books for the calendar year 1984. It was moved by Mr. Dalen, seconded by Mr. Shoell, that this be done. Carried unanimously. 11. New Business: Upon the Chairman's call for any new business,ness, Mr. Anderson expressed conceiii about the ways the proceeds of the new garbage disposal ta.: will be expended. He indicated that the Metropolitan Council is obviously carving out a role for itself in connection with solid waste disposal and the use of the proceeds of this tax. He indicated that a hearing will be held on January 28 on this subject and urged the SRA to monitor this matter. A question was raised as to whether the SRA Joint Powers Agreement would authorize this activity. Mr. LeFevere indicated that some preliminary work on this subject might be permissible but that any very significant involvement would appear to be beyond the authorized scope of the SRA. There followed further discussion of this subject. There was general agreement that this was a matter which member communities should follow closely, but no formal action was taken on the matter. -5- 12. Adjournment: There being no further business to come before the meeting, tic Chairman declared the meeting adjourned. Attest: airman Attachments ecretary SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY ANALYSIS OF CHANGE IN CASH BALANCE SAINT LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA For Year Ended December 31, 1984 Balance at January 1, 1984 $ 11,278.52 Additions: Interest Income $ 6,199.39 Special Assessments: City of Roseville $1,963.20 City of Circle Pines 245.40 City of Victoria 245.40 City of Lauderdale 245.40 City of Shakopee 490.80 City of Richfield 1,963.20 City of North St. Paul 736.20 City of Robbinsdale 736.20 City of Edina 2,454.00 City of Plymouth 1,717.80 City of Burnsville 1,963.20 City of Hastings 736.20 City of Shorewood 245.40 City of Orono 490.80 City of Brooklyn Center 858.90 City of Champlin 490.80 City of Moundsview 736.20 City of Spring Park 245.40 City of Bloomington 4,171.80 City of Colum bia Heights 1,227.00 City of Deephaven 245.40 City of Eden Prairie 980.80 City of Excelsior 245.40 City of Fridle•- 1,717.80 City of Greer 245.40 City of Croix 245.40 City of Maple Pia. 245.40 City of Maplewood 1,472.40 City of Minnetonka 1,963.20 City of Minnitrista 245.40 City of New Brighton 1,227.00 City of Wayzata 245.40 City of Woodland 245.00 City of Shoreview 981.60 32,268.90 94,803.79 Sale of investments 56,335.50 $106,082.31 Deductions: Accounts payable J. W. Wilson b Associates, Inc. $1,669.19 LeFevere,Lefler,Kennedv,O'Brien 3,964.16(A) _ 5 5,633.35 b Drawz Investments purchased 42,822.30 J. W. Wilson 6 Associates, Inc. 13,389.21 LeFevere,U fler,Kennedv,O'Hrien,&Drawz 41,956.01(A) George M. Hansen Company 525.00 104,325.87 Balance at December 31, 1984 $ 1,756.44 Page 2-- ANALYSIS OF CHANGE IN CASH BALANCE. Note A: The breakdown of legal cost as follows: General Metropolitan Waste Control NorthwesLern Bell Telephone Northern States Power Co. INVESTMENTS $12,903.72 3,929.50 28,981.95 105.00 $45,920.17 United titates Treasury Bills Discount Duc 1-24--85 united States Treasury Bills Discount Due 7-85 COST $14,243.67 14.243.13 $28,486.80 FACE VALUE $30,000.00 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY STATUS OF' ASSESSMENTS RECEIVABLE SAINT LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA As of December 31, 1984 BALANCE CITY VOTES ASSESSMENT PAID DUE Bloomington 17 $ 4,171.80 $ 4,171.80 _ $ -0- Brooklyn Center 7 1,717.80 858.90 858.90 Brooklyn Park 9 2,208.60 2,208.60 -0- Burnsville 8 1,963.20 1,963.20 -0- Champlin 2 490.80 490.80 -0- Circle Pines 1 245.40 245.40 -0- Columbia Heights 5 1,227.00 1,227.00 -0- Deephaven 1 245.40 245.40 -0- Eden Prairie 4 980.80 980.80 -0- Edina 10 2,454.00 2,454.00 -0- Excelsior 1 245.40 245.40 -0- Fridley 7 1,7)-.80 1,717.80 -0- Greenwood 1 245.40 245.40 -0- Hastings 3 736.20 736.20 -0- Hopkins 4 981.60 981.60 Lake St. Croix Beach 1 245.40 245.40 -0- Lakeland 1 245.40 245.40 Lauderdale 1 245.40 245.40 -0- Loretta 1 245.40 245.40 Maple Plain 1 245.40 245.40 -0- Maplewood 6 1,472.40 1,472.40 -0- Mendota Heights 2 490.80 490.80 -0- Minnetonka 8 1,963.20 1,963.20 -0- Minnetrista 1 245.40 245.40 -0- Mound 2 490.80 490.80 Mounds View 3 736.20 736.20 -0- New Brighton 5 1,227.00 1,227.00 -0- North St. Paul 3 736.20 736.20 -0- Osseo 1 245.40 245.40 -0- Plymouth 7 1,717.80 1,717.80 -0- Richfield 8 1,963.20 1,963.20 -0- Robbinsdale 3 736.20 736.20 -0- Roseville 8 1,963.20 1,963.20 -0- Shakopee 2 490.80 490.80 -0- Shoreview 4 981.60 490.80 490.80 Shorewood 1 245.40 245.40 -0- Spring Park 1 245.40 245.40 -0- St. Louis Park 9 2,208.60 2,208.60 -C- Vednais Heights 2 490.80 490.80 Victoria I 245.40 245.40 -0- Wayzata 1 245.40 245.40 -0- Woodland 1 245.40 245,00 .40 Orono 2 490.80 490.80 --0- $40,735.60 $36,931.50 $3,804.10 fJf F0 2 U �' :C iY #853 ;a&" Oou Kg lnt d that folio ws:dto mtencl nara[ a Lot 185 lying Southwesterly of a line described as g point In the Northwesterly line of said Lot 185 distant 45 feet Northeasterly from them,,[ vayta.ly corner of said Lot; thence at a Straight Iine to a point In the Southeasterly Iine of said Lot, which point Is distant 45 feet Northeasterly Fria the most Southerly corner of said Lot, In Taylor's Subdivision of Spring Park Lots, according to the plat thereof on file or o1 record In the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said County, AND ALSO Tract V. Registered land Survey No. 461. Files of Registrar of Titles. County of Nennepin, AND ALSO that Dart o/ 'acdted NaD le Avenue W h9 Nesterly and South- resterly of d Iine dram Froa the as St Northerly corner of to I, BIO Ck 1, IVY ESTATES, to the most Easterly corner of Lot M. Taylor's Subdivision of 51 ring Park Lots, and Tying Northeasterly of a line described as follows. Beglnnin9 at the Soutly hercorner of Tract V. Registered Land Survey No. 461. Files of Registrar of Titles, County of Nennepin; thence Southeasterly along the So utheas to rly extension of the So uthre sterly Iine of said Tract V to the center- Ilne of said Naple Avenue; the Southwesterly along said centerllne to Its intersection with the Northwesterly extension of the So uthre sterly line of Lot 161 MIn;hID's Subdivision o1 Spring Park Lots; thence Southeasterly along said North- westerly extension to the most Nesterly corner of said Lot Ifi 1, and there ending. Toa Bernier EofT-6rk 1, IVY ESTATES, according to the recorded plat thereof. G rr�Ba�rr of t5 160. 161, and 162, wlnshlp's s•,bdivlslon of Spring Park Lots. 1 hereby certify that this survey as prepared by me or under my direct super's s ion, and that I am a duly Reg l stered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of N.innee Sots. .Gl� of -Regis ra on 35 COFFIN a GRONBE RE, INC. CAS.CO COVE PROPOSED ';UBDIVION FOR DOUG KLINTa TOM BERNIER 9 GARY BARR OF TRACT V, RLS. NO. 461, LOTS 160-162 WINSHIPS SUB. OF SPRING PARK LOTS, LOT 184 B PART OF IBS SPRING PARK, LOT 1 , BLOCK I , IVY ESTATES, AND PART OF VACATED MAPLE AVENUE. DATE 12-19-84 SCALE: I"= 50' COFFIN B GRONBERG, INC. ENGINEERS 8 SURVEYORS LONG LANE, MINNESOTA