Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
12-10-1984 Council Packet
•MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD DECEMBER 10, 1984 PAGE 1 ATTENDANCE 7:00 PM The Orono City Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Butler, Council - members Grabek, Adams, and Hammerel. Councilmember Frahm was absent. City Engineer Cook, City Attorney Radio, Building& Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder Sutton represented the City Staff. City Attorney Malkerson arrived at 10:16 p.m. The new Councilmember effective January 1, 1985, Lynn Adams, arrived at 8:45 p.m. City Administrator Benson was absent. 7:00 PM PUBLIC HEARING PROGRAM YEARS IX AND X UNDER TITLE I OF THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT - RESOLUTION 11702 7:04 - 7:05 PM Mayor Butler announced that now was the time and place for the public hearing concerning the program amendment for program years IX and X under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act. City Recorder Sutton noted the affidavit of publication. There was no one present from the audience for this public hearing. Mayor Butler closed the public hearing at 7:05 p.m. Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson noted that with this amendment the City will have set aside $39,000 for the use of grant money for the Crystal Bay sewer improvements. Councilmember Adams moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to adopt Resolution #1702, A Resolution Amending the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). CRYSTAL BAY SEWER PROJECT DISCUSSION Mayor Butler stated that the first order of business is to accept the feasibility report by the Engineer. Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to accept the feasibility report prepared by City Engineer Cook. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). The following were present from the audience for the Crystal Bay Sewer Project: David Liesch of 1140 Willow Drive Bob Braun of 1230 Arbor Street Phil Raley of 1295 Brown Road South Jay Wood of 1285 Lrbor Street MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD DECEMBER 10, 1984 PAGE Z Wayne Kelley of 1099 Willow Drive South Keari Derry of 1115 Brown Road South Larry & Phyllis Symoniak of 1155 Brown Road South Margaret & Fred Curtis of 2180 Prospect Avenue Duane Glew of 1135 Brown Road South Curtis & Katherine Quady of 1223 Brown Road South Chauncey & Marvel Sandgren of 1215 Arbor Street Elvon Yager of 1223 Arbor Street Maybell Kohls of 1224 Briar Street Wayne & Judy Quast of 1205 Brown Road South LaDean McWilliams of 1130 Willow Drive South John Story of 1233 Briar Str-et Terry Morse of 2080 Spates Avenue Mindy Pattee of 1355 Arbor Street Rick Kiemer of 1212 Briar Street Mabel Bell of 1380 Briar Street Oliver Engstrom of 1145 Willow Drive South Randolph & Peggy Lukanen of 1085 Brown Road South Alex & Dianu Jentilucci of 1295 Briar Street Susan Rovegno of 2010 Shoreline Drive Mary & Jack Spence of 2040 North Shore Drive Karin Zeeb of 1245 Lakeview Avenue Norma Schnoor of 1220 Lakeview Avenue Judy Christensen of 1251 Brown Road South Barb Braun of 1230 Arbor Street Gary & Linda Printup of 1261 Briar Street Steve Carlson of 1205 Arbor Street Jan Johnson of 2170 Prospect Avenue Barbara Garcia 1335 Arbor Street Ardella & Richard Johnson of 1241 Brown Road South City Engineer Cook explained that he had realigned some of the sewer lines, and left the streets at the existing 16' to reduce the cost of the sewer project. Cook stated that the easement acquisition cost has been reduced, assuming that the neighborhood will give the Citv the easements. Cook stated that, the sodding has been eliminated and eplace.3 with seeding which also helped to reduce the cost. Cook noted that the per unit cost is $10,341.00 with the deletion of the above mentioned items. Cook noted the project cost of $597,900.00, witha restoration cost of $260,400.00for a total project cost of $858,300.00. Wayne Quast of 1205 Brown Road South asked why the Engineer showed the sewer line jacking across Brown Road twice. Quast stated that he would be willing to have th- sewer line run in front of his yard to save more money on the project cost. City Bngineer Cook stated that it would be more cost effective rather than tearing up the trees along the front of these properties. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEET1NG HELD DECEMi3ER 10, 1984 PAG1: 3 Wayne Quast of 1205 Brown Road South stated that there are no trees left. Other neighbors that live along that block were all in agreement to have the sewer line run along the front of their properties. City Engineer Cook stated with the owner's consent that this might reduce the project cost by as much as $20,000. Mayor Butler explained that the Council had previously directed the Engineer to go back and try to reduce the sewer project cost as much as possible. Butler noted that if the Council was to choose the 50-50 assessment option, that the per unit cost would be $5,270.00. City Engineer Cook stated that he looked at a method of assessing the project 40 percent on the front foot and 60 percent on the unit charge. Cook stated that based on assessing 50 percent of the project to the benefitting properties, the front footage charge would be $19.80/lineal foot and the unit charge would oe $3,170/unit. Cook used an example of a small lot (50' lot) which the assessment would be $4,160 or about $1,000 less than the assessment on the total unit. Cook stated that on a large lot (200' lot) the assessment would be $7,030. Curtis Quady of 1223 Brown Road asked the Council why they were still discussing the 50-50 option, where the neighbors have already told the Council that they will not accept the 50-50 option. Quady stated that the neighborhood wants the 30-70 split. Gary Printup of 1261 Briar Street asked why the Art Center hasn't been included in the project yet. Printup also noted that there isn't much difference between the 50-50 option and 30-70 option. Printup asked why the Council doesn't choose the 30-70 option. Printup noted the f igures from the last meeting in which with the 50-50 option on a $75,000 home and a $25,000 income, the general tax payer would have to pay $29.50 per year. Printup stated that with the 30-70 option it would increase only to $35.40 per year for 15 years. Mayor Butler stated that there will be other sewer projects in the future, and the Council would set a precedent for other sewer projects by using this 50-50 assessment option. Butler stated that other areas of the City have not had this benefit where the general tax payers have picked up part of the bill. One lady stated that only about 7 percent of the homes are having septic problems. She felt that sewer was being pushed on them. MINUTES ES 0E' THE 1ZI:GUI.AR ORONO COUNCIL. MELTING HELD 1E:CEMIQ-:1t 1 0, 1984 I'AG1; q A pol 1 was taken of the Counci 1 to get t hei r opinion on the assessment of the project. Councilmember Hammerel stated that the $5,000 figure was a reasonable figure with the 50-50 option. Hammerel felt that the 30-70 option would set a negative precedent for future sewer projects. Hammerel explained that if the neighborhood was to try *o maintain their septic systems, it would cost them much more. Counci lmember Adams stated that at f irst he was in favor of the 100 percent assessed option, but after hearing the financial hardships of this unique area, he would be willing to compromise at the 50-50 option. Adams stated that the Council has to consider the future too and not set a negative precedent. Councilmember Grabek felt that the 50-50 option was being too generous. Grabek noted that it should be 100 percent assessed against the benefitting property owners, but because of the situation specific to the Crystal Bay area there should be some consideration on the part of the City and that the 75-25 option would be best. Grabek felt to obligate the general tax payer to the 50-50 option would not be very responsible to the rest of the citizens of Orono. Grabek felt that sewer should be put into the area, but that the 50-50 option is too generous, and therefore he would vote against a motion to adopt the '0-50 assessment option. Mayor Butler noted the schedule of the sewer project that the Council can follow. Butler stated that the plans and crncs can be given to the Council on January 28, 1985, i _he Council orders the plans and specs at tonights meeting. Butler stated that at the January 28, 1985, Council meeting, a date for the bids would be set. Butler noted on March 1, 1985, the City would receive bids which would tell the City the true price of the project. Butler stated that on March 25, 1985, the special assessment hearing :oul.d be held, and if at that time too many people are opposed, the whole project is called off. Butler stated assuming it will continue, April 22, 1985, the contract would be awarded. Butler noted April 29, 1985, the construction would begin with a September 13, 1985, date for the completion of the project. Butler asked the Engineer how much plans and specs would cost. City Engineer Cook noted that plans and specs would cc approximately $40,000. One lady asked how much the Art Center would lower the cost of the project, if the center was included in the sewer project. She asked that the Council investigate this. •MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL ME-F.TI NG HELD DEWE WR 10, 1984 PAGL 5 City Fna i r.ncr Cook stater] that if the Art Center requires 1G sewer -nits, it would reduce the cost of the project $1,000 per unit. Cook stated that lie isn't sure how many units the Art Center would require. Mayor Butler closed the public discussion at 9:00 p.m. Butler also noted that the public hearing must be started over if the Art Center is to be included in the sewer project. Diann Jentilucci of 1295 Briar Street stated that since this project fell within an election year, and a new member of the Council will be here in 1985, she asked what assessment option the new member is going to be in favor of, and if he would be in favor of the sewer project itself . Lynn Adams. new Councilmember effective 1985, stated that the 50-50 option is more than generous. Adams noted that he would not vote for any mot ion beyond the 50-50. Adams felt that if the sewer project is rejected by the neighborhood, that the septic ordinances will. be enforced strictly and that the City is not interested in allowing failing and non- conforming systems to continue. Adams noted that the neighborhood has a good opportunity to get sewer at a lower cost than previous sewer project areas had. Councilmember Grabek moved, Mayor Butler seconded, to order plans and specs for the Crystal Bay Sewer Project to be received by the Council on January 28, 1985, per staff schedule submitted. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Butler moved, CouncilmemberHammerelseccnded,to approve the Consent Agenda*, subject to adding items #13 and #15 to the Consent Agenda and removing item #29 from the Consent Agenda for discussion, with all staff reports concerning these items to be attached to an original copy of these minutes on file in the City Clerk's office. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). APPROVAL OF MINUTES* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Hammerel seconded, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held November 26, 1984. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERV._PION DISTRICT REPORT There was no Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Report. PIANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Plannirg Commission Representative Bill Sime had no comments. MINUTES OF THE' REGULAR ORONO COUNCII, MEETING HELD D1iCF.MBER 10, 1984 PAGE 6 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments from the public present. #778 JOANN GRIMES 4720 NORTH ARM DRIVE WEST FINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #1703* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Hammerel seconded, to approve Resolution #1703, A Resolution Approving the Plat of McHaney Addition for JoAnn Grimes. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). #805 JOHN HALLSON 2640 WATERTOWN ROAD FINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION#1704* Mayor Butler moved, CouncilmemberHammerelseconded, to approve Resolution #1704, A Resolution Approving the Plat of Hallson Estates for John Hal ]son. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). #806 WILLOW PROPERTIES 2600 WAYZATA BLVD FINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #1705* Mayor Butler moved, CouncilmemberHammerelseconded, to approve Resolution #1705, A Resolution Approving the Plat c-: Willow Properties Addition for William Gagne. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). #839 JEFF STEBBINS 2195 WATERTOWN ROAD FINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION#1706* Mayor Butler moved, Counci lmember Hammerel seconded, to apprc,,e Resolution #1706, A Resolution Approving the Plat of Balsawood for Jef f Stebbins. Mot ion, Ayes (4) , Nays (0). #879 MALCOI,M 14ACKAY 1145 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #1707* Mayor Butler moved, Coanc;ImemberHammerel seconded, to approve Resolution 01707, A Resolution Approving A Metes 6 Bounds Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement for Malcolm MacKay. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). #882 THE FARM AT LONG LAKE 1765 WEST FARM ROAD SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #1708* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Hammerelseconded, to approve Resolution #1708, A Resolution Approving a Metes & Bounds Subeivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement for The Farm At ."ong Lake, Inc. Motion, Ayes ( 4) , Nays (0). MINUTES OF T11E REGULAR ORONU COUNCIL. MI•:I•:l';N(; 1)1-:CEMI1F.R 10, 1984 PAGL•: 7 #804 PAINTERS CREEK 4680 BAYSIDE ROAD FINAL SUBDIVISION A) PRIVATE ROAD NAME REQUEST Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to approve the road name request of Luce Line Ridge. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). #804 B) REFUND OF PUBLIC ROAD REVIEW FEE Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to approve the refund of the public road review fee in the amount of $1,000.00. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). #804 C) FINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #1709 Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to approve Resolution #1709, A Resolution Approving the Plat of Painters Creek. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). #816 LAKE MINNETONKA HOMES 155 WILLOW DRIVE SOUTH FINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #1710 Richard Conry was present. Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed with the Council the result of her survey with the cities of Wayzata, Plymouth, and Minnetonka Beach on their methods of the timing for issuing certificate of occupancies and building permits in relation to the completion of required plat improvements. Mabusth stated that she has added a condition to the resolution which should take care of the seeding and sodding condition if the weather does not al;nw seeding or sodding. Richard Conry stated that the revised resolution is acceptable to him. Councilmember Grabek moved, Mayor Butler seconded, to approve Resolution #1710, A Resolution Approving the Plat of Countryside Manor 2nd Addition. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). #820 LONIE FISK 493 PARK AVENUE VARIANCE DENIAL RESOLUTION #1711* Lonie Fisk was not present. Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Hammerel seconded, to approve Resolution #1711, A Resolution Denying Variances for Lonie Fisk to permit the construction of a home. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD DECEMBER 10, 1984 PAGE 8 #874 DUANE BARTH & MRS D JOHNSTONE 1810 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCE Mrs. Donald Johnstone and attorney, Glenn Troberg, were present. Duane Barth and Donald Peterson, developers, were also present. Barry Reoh, realtor, was present. Charles Pyle of 1870 Shadywood Road, Holly Eiss of 1790 Shady rood Road, and Richard Black of 1770 Shadywood Road, were in the audience for this application. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that the Planning Commission recommended denial. Gaffron noted that staff feels that the findings for approval far outweigh the justification for denial. Gaffron noted that in the research through the assessment history of the two lots, the two lots have been taxed as two sepa- to building sites. Gaffron noted that when a home is ),wilt on Lot 21 the existing garage will be - removed. Gaffron explained that both lots have been assessed a footage charge and a unit charge for water which indicates to staff that. they were considered as two separate building sites. Gaffron noted that the developers propose a "grass paver" method for the driveways therefore meeting the hardcover require- ments. Gaffron stated that the proposal fits in with the rest of the neighborhood. Holly Eiss of 1790 Shadywood Road state) that she was not in favor of the application because she doesn't want a new home 20' from her window. Eiss stated that she would prefer no one out her window. Richard Black of 1770 Shadywood Road noted that the Council has an obligation to the neighborhood to uphold the variance rules and regulations. Black stated that. variances should bP granted only in the most exceptional circumstances. Black noted that approv- ing this variance would set a precedent that would not be good for the neighborhood. Don Peterson, developer, rioted that. Mrs. Johnstone has maintained thin property separately with the i-..tent to build on it in the future. Peterson noted that there are 39 lots in thf, neighborhood, 23 lots are smaller than the this one, 15 lots that are larger. Peterson stated that they are proposing to cover less than 25 percent of the lot and are planning to meet all building requirements. Peterson stated that they are asking for no other variances other than that of being allowed to build on a lot that was f,la4-ted prior to the City's current ordinances. MINUTES 01' THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING Iili1.0 DECE'MIIEP 10, 1984 PAGE 9 Glenn Troberg, Johnstone's attorney, noted the Smith variance applica'ion which set a precedent when Counci 1 approved it on March 15, 1984, which is identical to this with the following findinqs: 1. No other land available. Troberg noted that in the Johnstone's case :here is no land available. 2. Lots were developed on both sides of the property. Troberg noted this is the same in the Johnstone's case. 3. Property was served with sewer and water. Troberq stated that the Johnstone's property i s served with sewer and water. 4. Proposed house and improvements can be constructed without the need for additional variances. Troberg stated that this is the case with the Johnstone's application. 5. Applicant purchased the property not knowing the existing ordinances. Troberg noted that in the Johnstone's case, the applicant had the property a long time before the existing ordinances were adopted. 6. Granting a variance would have no negative affect to "he public health, safety and wet fare. Troberg stated that here the Johnstone's application would have no negative affect on the public health, safety, and welfare. 7. Granting a variance would be consistent with the area. Troberg stated that the Johnstone application fits right in with the existing neighborhood. Councilmember Grab:?k moved, Mayor Butler seconded, to app�oveavariancPfor Barth/Johnstone and direct staff to draft a resu,lution of approval incorporating the following findings: 1. The proposal can meet all hardcover requirements of the LR-lC zoning district. 2. All setha(.k requirements for the new lot can be met. 3. From the tax record it appears that the lot has been valued and assessed as a separate lot, not incrementally as part of the adjacent property. 4. The applicant has owned the property since before the current zoning went into effect. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD DECEMBEN 10, 1984 PAGE 10 5. The property has been assessed for sewer. 6. The property has been assessed for water and was assessed a separate water un;t for each lot. 7. The lot area is consistent with many other properties in the neighborhood and is equivalent to or larger than 11 of 25 lots in the neighborhood. Approval conditions to include: 1. Granting a variance to the setbacks for the existing house on Lot 22. 2. No other performance standard setbacks allowed for either lot (i.e. both lots must meet all hardcover and setback requirements). 3. Payment of a park fee for new lot in the amount of $430. 4. $225 sewer plant charge to be paid with buil?'n— permit along with standard SAC charges, etc. 5. Applicants to bear the expense of bringing sewer and water to the property if no stubs exist. 6. Maximum hardcover of Lot 21 to be 2, 280 sf including roofs, decks, driveways, sidewalks, patios, terraces, etc. 7. Applicant placed on notice of the hardcover limitations for both lots. S. No other variances will be granted. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (1). Councilmember Adams voted nay. Adams felt that this application is beyond the borderline for approval, and that the Council has to draw the line somewhere. Mayor Butler noted that the resolution should be filed in the chain of title of both lots. #880 8TXVZN RULE 4625 WWT BRANCH ROAD CONDITIONAL. USS PRRMIT R2801.OTION t1712Mayor Butler moved, Counci lmember Hammerel seconded, to approve Resolution 11712, A Resolution Granting A Conditional Use Permit to permit construction of a green house with limited commercial use. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). MINUTES OF 1111: RFGUTAR ORONO COUNCIL M1:1•:T1NG 111:LD DE:CEMRE:R 10, 1984 PAGE 11 1881 WILLIAM KRUTZIG 1629 BOHNS POINT ROAD VARIANCE William Krutzig was present. Assistart Zoning Administrator Gaffror, noted that some drainage problems are in the process of being resolved to the satisfaction of the City. Gaffron noted that the applicant is constructing a new residence. Gaffron stated that after the applicant applied fcr a building permit, tie was notified that portions of the proposed improvements would go over the hardcover limitations for the property and that he would have to apply for a variance for these specific items. Gaffron stated that the applicant is requesting a variance for the deck and courtyard improvements. Gaffron noted that the driveway would be constructed with a porous pavement in order that the hardcover requirements be met. Gaffron noted that the applicant' s rationale f or request i ng the variance is chat a large portion of the lot is in the 250'- 500' zone and will have no hardcover where 30 percent isallowed, hence the total requested hardcover behind the 75' setback line will be less than the maximum allowed. Gaffron noted that this type of tradeoff has been allowed in the past where there was existing hardcover but not for new construction. Assistant. Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that Planning Commission recommended Genial. Gaffron also noted the sewer problems. Gaffron explained that the neighbors at some time in the past put their sewer lines on Krutzig's property. Gaffron noted that the neighbors do not appear to :lave legal easements over this property. Gaf f ron noted that all the neighbors do think they have easements over the Krutzig's property. Gaffron stated that the drainage onto this property is naturally occuring and wi 11 have to be addressed by the applicant. William Krutzig noted that the existing easement documents were in good intent, but the wording is not sufficient to make then. adequate easements. Krutzig stated that Mr. Fox doesn't have an easerrment. but has the nigh+_ to hookup. Krutzig stated that Mr. Lomar has no sewer easement across his lot. Krutzig noted that he plans to grant easements for the neighbors. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffronalso noted that on Friday, December 7, 1984, +-he site was posted with a stopwork order for filling within 75' of the lakeshore. Gaffron explained that the cat operator was told by his supervisor to do the grading. Gaffron noted that the cat operator responded very quickly in removing tY.e fill. Gaf fron felt that there was not an intent not to comply with the ordinances, but just miscommunication among the contractors. MINUTES ES OF THE I(EGULAR ORONO COUNC 1 I. MEETING IIELD DE-CEM10a4 10, 1964 PAGi: 12 William Krutzig stated that he could redirect the drainage down the property line and create a swale. Krutzig also noted that the drainage could be redirected from the roof to collect in a retention pond. Krutzig explained that when he came into City Hall he was not aware of. ha: dcover limitations. Krutzig noted that at the time he found out about the hardcover problem from staff, he had already spent $6,600 on building plans. Krutzig stated the staff recommended that he seal-_ the house ?own and - co two stories high. Krutzig stated that after spend"ng $6,600 a builder just doesn't throw that aside and waste that money, so he ::ontinued. Krutzig questioned the City's interpretation that decks are 100 percent hardcover. Willitim Krutzig asked for an interpretation from staff or Council on why decks ale considered hardcover. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that usually ::ecks have plastic underneath them so that w3eds :10 not grow through the decking. Gaf f:or stated r.hat board spacing varies from deck to deck and could become a policing nightmare if the staf f had to inspect each deck to determine if it was hardcover or just a certain percentage of hardcover, therefore the City just consA er.s decking as 100 percent hardcover. Krutzig stated that he was planning on having 1' of sand benesth his deck which should not classify it as hardcover. Krutzig stated tnat he could go to an engineer to get percolation tests done to show to the City that decks should not be considered hardcover and may prove to be only a percentage of hardcover. C_.jnci: felt that they would tak;: this into consideration if he brought the information needed. Councilmember Grabek moved, Councilrrember Adams seconded, to deny the Krutzig variance application requesting a hardcover variance to construct a deck and courtyard improvements based on Planninq Commission's following findings: At the time of application, the applicant was informed by staff fully of the hardcover. limit "ions within the 75-250' setback zone. 2. This is a substandard lot in area and slightly substandard on lot width. 3. It is a low lot that provides hydraulic cApac-ity fc- the drainage of ad�oininq properties and th+• building department should address that ztsLe. MINUTLS OF TI11•: 10 MAR 0110140 COUNCI L. MEETING Ii1:I.0 I)I: EMI{l:k 10, 1984 PAGE 13 4. An adequate house for this lot could have been constructed, meeting the 4,595 sf of allowed hardcover in the 75-250' zone. 5. That the additional hardcover is not necessary to maintain a substantial property right. 6. This problem of hardcover was brought on by the applicant. Motion, Ayes ( 4) , Nays (0) . Grabek noted that it is the responsibility of the builder to ask the right questions and get the correct information regarding zoning and building codes before building. #854 G. ROBERT JOHNSON 1981 FAGERNESS POINT ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION #1713 G. Robert Johnson was present. City Attorney Radio stepped down from his City Attorney position because of a conflict of interest wherein Robert Johnson and Tom Radio are employed by the same firm, Popham, Haik & Associates. Gary Larson, attorney, was hired by the City to represent the City of Orono for this application. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that this is an after the fact application wherein the applicant constructed retaining walls, planters, and steps within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone. Gaffron stated that the apparent clearing of trees within the 0-75' setback zone were done by the previous owner per the previous cwnerIs letter. Gaffron noted that .?ohnson had thought that the contractor had taken all the permits needed. Gaffron stated that one solution to the hardcover is to use a pitchfork to pierce the plastic beneath the rocks. Councilmember Grabek asked staff if the City would have granted Johnson the permit if he had come into the offices before he commenced work. Assistant Zoninq Administrator Gaffron replied that Johnson would have had to apply for a variance for hardcover. Gaffron stated that upon staff investi- gation the steps were existing and that Johnson only replaced the steps. Gaffron noted that there isn't an increase 'n hardcover because of the added retention capacity of the planters. Gaffron did note that the Public Works Coordinator recommends the retaining walls be moved out of the right of way. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING 111:1.1) UECEMI;ER 10, 1904 PAGE 14 Robert. Johnson noted that his property has had no increase in hardcover. Johnson noted that he thought that Niccum, contractor, had taken all the permits needed from City Hall. Johnson noted that the erosion on his property was fierce and that something had to be done. Johnson stated that only the diseased eln. was removed. Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson stated that he as a staff person cannot approve anything within the right of way. Gerhardson stated that leaving the stairs in the right of way would be acceptable only if the applicant doesn't hold the City responsible for plowing damage► and would grant the City a hold harmless agreement. Councilmember Grabek stated that from all the documentation that he felt that there wasn't a violation regarding the tree cutting. Grabek Noted that there wasn't much done to the area that wasn't already existing. Councilmember Grabek moved, Councilmember Hammerel seconded, to approve Resolution 41713, A Resolution Granting A Conditional Use Permit and Variance for an after -the -fact application of Robert Johnson to allow the placement of retaining walls, planters, and stairs within 75' of the lakeshore, subject to amending condition i5 to include a hold harmless agreement from Johnson regarding the retaining walls within the right of way, and applicant to sign such hold harmless agreement. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (1). Mayor Butler voted nay. WATER RATE REVIEW City Engineer Cook stated that this was included in the Council packets upon receipt of a complaint from an Orono resident regarding his high water bill. Cook did note that this resident has a swimming pool. which resulted in his high water bill. EASEMENT PAYMENT NAVARRE FORCE MAIN PROJECT* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Hammere 1 seconded, to approve the easement payment f or the Navarre Force Main Project $230.20. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD DECEMBER 10, 1984 PAGE 15 PAYMENT #2 TO B i D CONTRACTING - NAVARRE FORCE MAIN PROJECT* PAYMENT #1 F F JEDLICKI HIGHWAY 12 SEWER REPAIR i DITCH GRADING* CABLE TV REPORT LIQUOR STORE OPERATING RESULTS - THREE MONTHS ENDED 9-30-84 ESTABLISH 1985 SALARIES RESOLUTION #1714 1985 CALENDAR* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Hammerel seconded, to approve Payment #2 to B & D Contracting in the amount of $33,319.11 for the Navarre Force Main Project. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). COUNCILMEMBERS SCHEDULE TO ATTEND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS* MONTHLY LIQUOR STORE OPERATION REPORT FOR OCTOBER, 1984* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Hammerel seconded, to approve Payment #1 to F.F. Jedlicki, Inc. Jfn the amount of $11,6e5.00 for the Highway 12 sewer repair and ditch grading project. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). Mayor Butler announced a Cable TV Meeting to be held December 11, 1984 at 5:30 p.n.. at Shorewood City Offices. Councilmember Adams moved, Mayor Butler seconded, to approve the liquor store operation results report prepared by Finance Director Kuehn. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays ( 0) . Mayor Butler noted the resolution to establish the salaries for 1985 wi`h a four percent increase for employees. Butler told staff that merit reviews should be done in June. Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to approve Resolution #1714, A Resolution Establishinq 1985 Salaries. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). Mayor But ler moved, Counc i I member Hammere1 seconded, to approve the Calendar of City Meetings for 1985. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). Mayor Butler moved, Counci lmember Hammere 1 seconded, to approve the Councilmembers schedule to attend Planning Commission meetings for 19p5. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). Mayor Butler moved, Counci lmember Hammerel seconded, to approve the monthly liquor store operating report for October, 1984, prepared by Finance Director Kuehn. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETIAG HELD DECEMBER 10, 1984 PAGE 16 YEAR-TO-DATE ESTIMATED REVENUES COMPARED TO ACTUAL REVENUES AS OF 9-30-84* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Hammerel seconded, to approve the year-to-date estimated revenues compared to actual revenues as of September 30, 1984, prepared by Finance Director Kuehn. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). YEAR-TO-DATE BUDGET APPROPRIATION COMPARED WITH ACTUAL EXPENDITURES AS OF 9-30-84 Councilmember Adams noted that he had this item removed from the Consent Agenda because he felt there was a mistake in the numbers and asked that this item be tabled to allowed staff time to check into the matter. Councilmember Adams moved, Councilmember Hammerel seconded, to table the budget appropriation report . Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). MATERNITY LEAVE POLICY* Mayor Br.tler moved, Councilmember Hammerel seconded, to approve the maternity leave policy for the Police Department. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Hammerl seconded, to approve the memo from Assistant Finance Director Lattin regarding the comparable worth study to be done by Control Data Corp. Business Adv vr!-. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). INSURANCE AWARD* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember H. -R-. , 1 seconded, to award the insurance bid to Leayie of Minnesota Insurance Trust for the am )i of $75,050.34. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). 1985 SQUAD CARS* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Hammerel seconded, to approve the purchase of three 1985 squad cars at $10.884 per unit from Elk River Ford -Mercury, Inc. with an estimated trade-in amount of $2, 500/car for a total of $27,700 for all three cars. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). RESOLUTION #1715 UNCOLLECTABLE NSF CHECKS* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Hammerel seconded, to approve Resolution #1715, A Resolution Declaring Certain Checks Uncollectable and Removing them from the Various City Accounts. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). TRANSFER OF FUNDS LIQUOR OPERATING FUND TO GENERAL FUND* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Hammerel seconder', to approve the transfer of funds from the liquor operating fund in the amount of $15,000 to the general fund. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCI I, MEETING HI'.I,D DECEMBER I • , 1984 PAGE 17 TRANSFER OF FUNDS GENERAL FUND TO IMPROVEMENT i EQUIPMENT OUTLAY FUND* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Hammerel seconded, to approve transfers of funds from the General Fund to the Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund in the amounts of $20,000 and $17,604. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). TRANSFER OF FUNDS GENERAL FUND TO BUILDING CAPITAL PROJECT FUND* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Hammerel:,econded, to approve a transfer of funds from the General Fund to Bui lding Capi tal Project Fund i n the amount of $20, 000. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). TRANSFER OF MWCC DEBT - SEWER OPERATING FUND TO SEWER DLBT FUND* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Hammerel seconded, to approve a transfer of the MWCC Debt Service Credit - Sewer Operating Fund to Sewer Debt Fund 1966-1976 in the amount of $16,334. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). LOAN PAYMENT ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLE* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Hammerel seconded, to approve a loan payment in the amount of $1,454 from the General Fund Administration Department to the Equipment Outlay Fund as the fourth and final installment to repay the cost of the 1980 Ford Fairmont. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). LOAN PAYMENT - TRACTOR/ LOADER/ BACK HOE *Mayor Butler moved, Counci lmember Hammerel seconded, to approve a loan payment in the amount of $7,244 from the General Fund Street Department to the Equipment Outlay Fund as the fourth of seven installments to repay the cost of the 1981 Ford 750 tractor/loader/backhoe. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). LOAN PAYMENT - DUMP TRUCK* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember)iammerelseconded, to approve a loan payment in the ariount of $4,650 from the General Fund Street D^partment tc the Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund as the second of five installments for the GMC dump truck. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). LOAN PAY14F.NT - SEWER OPERATING FUND* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Hammerel seconded, to approve a loan payment in the amount of $5,000 from the Sewer Operating Fund to the PTR Fund as final payment of the $50,000 loan. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. kEETING HELD DECEMBER 10, 1984 PAGE 18 NAVARRE WELL LOAN PAYMENT WATER OPERATING FUND TO SEWER OPERATING FUND* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Hammerel seconded, to approve the f i fth and f inal loan payment in the ar : %t of $2,017 from the Water Operating Fund to the S. Operating Fund. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). NAVARRE WATER TOWER LOAN PAYMENT - WATER OPERATING FUND TO SEWER OPERATING FUND* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Hammerel seconded, to approve the third loan payment in the amount of $4,642 from the Water Operating Fund to the Sewer Operating Fund. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT City Attorney Radio recommended that the personnel matters he discussed in executive session. At the recommendation of the City Attorney, Tom Radio, Council directed staff to draft a memo to the liquor store manager stating that discounts to City Employees and elected officials are not to be allowed unless that same discount is offered to the general public. BILLS* Mayor. Butler moved, Councilmember Hammerel seconded, that the All Funds Accounts and Liquor Store Accounts be paid. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). ADJOURNMENT 11:45 PM Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Adams seconded, to adjourn the regular Council meeting at 11 :45 p.m. and to enter into executive session. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). ATTEST: orothy M. allin, 4ffity Clerk Mary C. B ler, Mayor AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FUR MONDAY, DECEMBER 10, 1984, 7:00 P.M. (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items tQQUNQLt(MEU1% one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. DEC 11 1984 ROLL CALL 1. 7:00 P.M. Public Hearing Program Amendment - ProllshTiy"ORO(RONO Under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act 2. Crystal Bay Area Sewer Project 3. CONSENT A(;ENDA* APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 4. Regular Meeting of November 26, 1984 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Bill Sime Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT * 5. 4778 JoAnn Gtimes, 4720 North Arm Drive West - Final Subdivision - Resolution * 6. #805 John Hallson, 2640 Watertown Road - Final Subdivision - Resolution t 7. #806 Willow Properties, 2600 Wayzata Boulevard - Final Subdivision - Resolution * 8. #839 Jeff Stebbins, 2195 Watertown Road - Final Subdivision - Resolution * 9. 879 Malcolm MacKay, 1145 Sixth Avenue North - Subdivision - Resolution *10. #882 The Farm At Long Lake, 1765 West Farm Road - Subdivir - Resolution 11. #804 Painters Creek Development, 4680 Bayside Poad - Final Subdivision a) Private Road Name Request h) Refund of Public Road Review Fee c) Final Subdivision - Resolution 12. #816 Lake Minnetonka Homes, 155 Wi 1 low Drive South - Final Subdivision - Resolution 13. #820 Lonie Fisk, 493 Park Avenue - Varian-z - Denial Resolution 14. #874 Duane Barth and Mrs. C. Johnstone, 1810 Shadywood Road - Variance 15. #880 Steven Ruce, 462� West Branch Road - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution 16. 4881 William Krutzig, 1629 Bohn's Point Road - Variance 17. #854 G. Robert Johnson, 1981 Fagerness Point Road - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution 10:39 P.M. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT 18. Water Rate Review Orono Residents in Wayzata Service Area '19. Easement Payment Navarre Force Main Project 010. Payment #2 B & f) Contracting Navarre Force Main Project *111. Payment 01 F. F. Jedlecki Inc., Highway 12 Sewer Repair and Ditch Grading AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, DECEMBER 10, 1984, 7:00 P.M. MAYOR'S REPORT CABLE TV REPORT 22. Meeting December 11, 1984, 5:30 P.M., Shorewood City Offices TRANSPORTATION REPORT CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 23. Liquor Store Operating Results - Three Months Ended September 30, 1984 24. Establish 1985 Salaries - Resolution *25. 1985 Calendar - Meeting Sch-6ule *26. Council Members Attendance - Planning Commission Meetings for 1985 *27. Monthly Liquor Store Operating Report - October 1984 *28. Year -to-Date Estimated Revenues Compared to Actual Revenues as of September 30, 1984 *29. Year to Date Budget Appropriation Compared With Actual Expenditures as of September 30, 1984 *30. Mall:rnity Leave Policy *31. Comparable Worth Study *32. Insurance Award *33. 1985 Squad Cars *34. Uncollectable N.S.F. Checks - 1983 - Resolution *35. Transfer of Funds - Liquor Operating Fund to General Fund *36. Transfer of Funds - General Fund to Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund *37. Transfer of Funds - General Fund to Building Capital Project Fund *38. Transfer of M.W.C.C. Debt Service Credits - Sewer Operating Fund to Sewer Debt Fund 1966-1976 *39. Loan Payment - Administrative Vehicle Administration Department to Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund *40. Loan Payment - Tractor/Loader/Backhoe - Street Department to Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund *41. Loan Payment - Dump Truck - Street Department to Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund *42. Loan Payment - Sewer Operating Fund to P.I.R. Fund *43. Navarre Well Loan Payment - Water Operating Fund to Sewer Opeuating Fund *44. Navarre Water Tower - Loan Payment - Water Operating Fund to Sewer Operating Fund CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S LETTERS AND MEMOS CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 45. Personr,t,l Matters LICENSES !46*) BILLS (47*) ADJOURNMENT 6 To: Orono Council Members COUNCIL MEETING DEC 10 1984 CITY OF ORONO From: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator Date: December 6, 1984 Subject: Public Hearing Amending Community Development Block Grant Program Is has been determined that now that the handicap access ramp at precinct #3 Lakeview Golf Course is completed that there is a shortage of funds in the amount of $1,920.00 to pay for the project. Community Development Block Grant Funds were allocated to fund the project. It has also been determined that there is a balance of funds in the Crystal Bay/Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer feasibility studys projects. In order to transfer funds from one project to another and not lose the balance of funds from the sewer feasibility projects, these monies must be transferred, so that we may accomplish this it is necessary to conduct a public hearing. Attached for your review and approval is a resolution to accomplish the above. It is my recommendation to approve the attached resclution as drafted. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Orono has executed a Joint coorperation agreement with Henne-in County agt.•ee:ir.c3 to participate in the Urban Hennepin Cou:.zy Community Levc-1cpment Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the Orono City Council has acted to undertake activities funded throught the program for each year of its particA-pation; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to amend the activities; and WHEREAS, the City conducted a public hearing on December 10, 1984, to gain citizens input on the amendments. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Orono City Council amends the Urban Hennepin Community Development Program for years 9 and 10 as follows: Program Original Amended Year Activity Budget Budget 1 X 906 Crystal Bay Sewer Feasibility Study 23,489 2,311 1 X 907 Stubbs Bay Sewer Feasibility Study 23,489 3,039 1 X Architect•iral Barrier Removal -0- 1,920 X Crystal Bay Sanitary Sewer Improvements -0- 39,708 Adopted by the City Council at a regular Council meeting the loth day of December, 1984. Ayes Nays ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Minnesota Suburban Newspapers, Inc. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) DONALD K. MORTENSON being duly sworn, on oath says that he is the operations manager and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as Wayzata/Plymouth sailor and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: (A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statutes 331.02, 331.06, and other applicable laws. (B)The printed Notice of Public Hearing which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week, for one successive weeks; it was first published on Monday , the 26 day of Nov , 19 8 4 _, arid was thereafter printed and published on every to and including — day of 19 ,the Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inciusive, which is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publicat, m of the notice: abedrf ghr Jt im imp ,raluvw x., Subset ibed and sworn to before me on this 2 to day of Nov , 19__ A I.. P0EL M. HEDBLOM t+� c - Mtt+rltsot� H-144rfN COUNTY Mi .orrme+aafon •+Wra mil' 2. 19" rrrtt.r.r ►aber."" •9T►C s rl JI.N M[ ARING ON►MM/aAM AMtMomtM7 %MKV to b O►, pM tells MeO rroPta COUNT mm of CM, .f (lr.r OtIl how a r.hhr is resewor proposed arewome 1 r ter a.n I• ad X ..Mr Tttto lTthr ewwr�I, be oe atr � Apr r. {. w 1�f�yr }�i�ryr(a' W.•O . Mr M. MIN. w r me " t. w Or.Ma C4600 arnsbara locate/ w 40 IWO& Or"" Re" ra the CMT fYf wr boar1MR r " halt /MrQltf/ to a pow (Owl so" or.f- lweN COUNT bad tar CHI w Or. tl ro, O to DON& MY hT N.W IMTa rt.r f Irb LAMP DEC 4 sm MY OF ORONC' Affidavit of Publication State of Minnesota ) )SS. County of Hennepin ) /6"/Z L. (tw �, /4LA being July awtwn. - .awh mv% that lwo. " dte pubiuher or w0bouai a4em aml—WAo)er rJ the puMoltrr .A the nrr.p{er ►mrrn a. Tl< Laker aW IW full ►m.rkdle 4 the Iry rhwh are waled bchw (A) the aeryarper hu c.anplrrl r.th all .a the rtaptremerMa irntutt um l; yuallfwalkr as a kpl re r.ppr, a+ p--ki b/ Mtn u Statue. 331 02. 111 06' WW rahcr VOKIble Wa t6k The IV,." _ kO 77C&-- whwb is Nucbad waa cut fr.Nh the cdumna of uW mwwspWf. Well wpi%cJ aW paabblealli tl ante eatY Wmak. for wc.taawe wet►a, n wn (trw puMtJ.eJ .n L a'I the '_. /n/�Ja1 n1-.-! v-.. v. 19 / am ru th—atk-r pnmal a W pumt.hrd .>n —rl .-..... and u.lup.nkt - dw -..._ --- _.. 19—_ ._.___._. _ Pr r%eJ behrw n a -M of f.- I..ra .aw LptWet Inen % w / ,�Ah i 1-- rhr.h , Irrr61 rinowkJpl as brrti the We arW ►tal .rl I/pe u.ed in the ltenp..nt..n 'Ni pablt.a — W the Mahe aAJelghgllor. q.Irwu.r.f r Snba.rrhM wall .w.nn w before me `, L BLRR! 1 N tr . Ja> d Vaw NDII ItplIGM1N*WA Z-olmCIRVER COUW Y rrke �, ,.. aw MI MMf11'� mo1ac• 0 -we* Paw ow 1"WXal1 esnlp 40d go OXy 01 Omr we $Iwo Oak htMtrp to MINN /1poX on I " 10 paq►at" = OW X tome, T IIt 10f 00 Mp/r am i4�111y CO1191~ to of 411M1d0/ e�m1 PwgaPmwn p1k1n r 1 00 %lllp0 10 iMM M pow ft-Wo r a 1r0 11010 4111 Oon~ 10 IN•, r Too r wl on 1W dWO OPAW rrlydlw0 Mooted of 1ITS 0111I1 91OWN Allmd M wo Owf10 TMa • Milt Wild POMAW l 10 to low" r-000@MNM rr9dA1tp9 owumn ►bn 1 amw '' *v and go Cfgr M done M S 471 59 11OO11110r1Y M "oft aM am^ Okd* o r r M 1 OW U10e 27 104 1 r N@ NO�q N;j� I11NOV 2 8 ON !. D CITY OF CAR 4 COUNCIL MEETING DEC 10 1984 To: Orono Council CITY OF ORONO From: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator Date: December 7, 1984 Subject: Assessment Policies Attached for review is page 1 of a 15 page document that pertains to sanitary sewer and water projects and how they can be assessed. The entire document was presented to you for the September 24, 1984 Council meeting. I will have a complete document for review at t? December 10, 1984 Council meeting in the event you cannot locate yours. SANITARY SEWER The first-;,nitary sewer project was constructed in 1963 and 1964. The Frencl ke Sanitary Sewer District was formed, basically comprising LOe area that would be served by the French Lake Sewage Treatment Plant. The trunk sewers were construct large enough to service the entire area including Minnetonka Beach. An assessment of $110.00 p(-r acre was levied at that time to def ray the cost of the trunk sewer. T,ateral sewers were also assessed in addition to the trunk sewer cost. The acreage assessment was spread throughout the entire district to be served by the trunk sewer. A-i assessment of $225.00 (to amortize the cost of the sewage treatment plant) was levied for each single family residence or its eq-iivalent where sewer service was available. This assessment was not levied against vacant property. New residences were charged the $225.00 at the time a building permit was issued for a house with sewer service available. Prior to 1971 all costs relating to the construction of lateral sewers were assessed on a footage basis. In that year the policy was revised to assess 40% on a footage basis and the remaining 60% on a unit basis. ,tie unit is based on a single family residence (or its equivalent), or if the property is vacant, on the unit area required to construct a single family residence. The unit area is based on existing neighborhood density or zoning. The footage is taken to be the actual footage for rectangular lots and the average width for irregular lots. The front lot line is often used where the side lot lines are only slightly skewed, particularly where the sewer runs parallel to the front lot line. The minimum footage assessment for a buildable lot is 50 feet. Corner lots are assessed for the frontage or average width, generally taken to be the narrowest width. If the lot is deeper than the average lot in the neighborhood the additional depth will be assessed as frontage, multiple units and additional footage will be assessed. A vacant lot under single and separate ownership is not assessed for a unit if it is too small to qualify for a building permit but will be assessed for footage. Multiple small lots owned by the same person are assessed fractional units relating to the number of lots required to be combined to qualify for a building permit. The footage is fully assessed. Assessments for residential and commercial properties rare calculated in the same manner and at the same rate, however commercial buildings are assessed fur lateral and :-onnection units based on the sewage flow compared to a single family residence. WATER 'The assessment policy for water is similar to sewer in that 40% is based on footage and 60% on units. There was no separate connection cost for the wells, tank and treatment plant. The footage assessment is c .ated in the same manner as for the sewer. The units are L .lated in the same manner for the residential properties. Commercially zoned properties are limited to 4 units per acre when occupied and 2 her acre when vacant. Each commercial unit or assessable foot is calculated at 1.5 times the rate for residential p acfc l o` 7 5 COUNCIL MEETING DEC 10 1984 FEASIBILITY REPOR TTI OF ORONO SUPPLEMENT FOR CRYSTAL BAY SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS FOR CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 13918 o .2335 9f/ 7...,a .h.yA , 36 -- J., n.a4 A(--"" 351/3 PAa— 6J2-636-4600 December 6, 1994 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Orono Box 66 Crystal, Minnesota 55323 Re: Crystal Bay Sanitary Sewer Improvements Our File No. 13918 Dear Mayor and Council: r ltrt f, tlo.r,rrut, P f Nnhrrl NRome. P E Joseph C .�Mrrld. P L. HIMMrd 4 /. nnhrrt P L Nip hard L. Iar.er. P L Jo.see (' Oh,,.. P L Gke. R Coot, P E. h'rdh A Gordon, P E. Thonme E Noy". P E RKbrd N' Iasa+. PE. Rohrrr G SchunKhe. P E Nan a [ WwAa. P.E. !Iona c Rurryardi, P.E. Jury A fi—rdo.. P E .Mart A Na.,o.. P E Ted A' Tad, P £ MKMrN T Rae.r.oa.n. P E Rohm R PJrffVk, P E M.d 0 1 Awa. P E Cho"..4 Er.4mn Lot 1/ Pa.rl,t, Hark. A! 0hon Transmitted herewith is the Feasibility Report Supplement to the Crystal Bay Sanitary Sewer Improvements. This Report Supplement provides for rerouting of sanitary sewer lines on easements to minimize the project cost. We would be pleased to discuss this report further with the City Council at any mutually convenient time. Respectfully submitted, BONESTR00, ROSENEE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, C. / ,A, 'e Glenn R. Cook, P.E. GRC:kf I hereby certify that this Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Date: September 21, 1984 Reg. No. 9451 FEASIBILITY REPORT SUPPLEMENT CRYSTAL BAY SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS DISCUSSION: This Supplement to the feasibility report for the Crystal Bay sanitary sewer improvements has been prepared to outline a more economical plan for constructing the project. The Report supplement provides for the placement of sanitary sewer lines on easements in several areas to shorten the length of line constructed and minimize the street reconstruction costs. The layout of the sanitary sewer lines proposed in this report are shown on the attached plan. Placement of the sanitary sewer lines on easements will require the close cooperation of the residents or the project costs could exceed that outlined in the original feasibility report. Easements will also to required for the placement of services to the individual homes. This supplement also provides for a reduction in the street section. The original report provided for a 28 foot wide street with berm curbs in accordance with the City zoning code. This report supplement provides for the replacement of only those streets disturbed by construction. The disturbed streets would he reconstructed to a 16 foot width whir, is similar to the existing section. The report also eliminates the sod from the project with all areas disturbed being seeded. COST ZSTIMATE: The summary of project costs are outlined below with the detailed cost estimates provided at the back of this report. The cost estimates are based on unit prices for the 1985 construction season. The coat estimates presented below include a 5 percent allowance for contingencies and a 25 percent allowance for project design, administrative, bonding, capitalised interest, and legal costs. - 1 - 0-485 7c 84-1 Sanitary Sewer Extension 84-2 Street 6 Boulevard Restoration Total Estimated Project Cost $597,900.00 260,400.00 $858,300.00 ASSESSMENTS: The project costa as outlined are proposed to be assessed to the adjacent property based on benefit received. There are 83 units to be served as a part of the improvement with the potential to serve an additional 2 units in the future. The City property in the area is proposed to be assessed 5 units. Total Estimated Pr t Cost Estimated Unit Cost $858,300.00 $ 10,341.00 The property to be assessed is shown on Figure II at the back of this report. CONCLUSIONS b RECOMMENDATIONS: The proposed improvements described in this report are feasible as they relate to general engineering principals and construction procedures. The following recommendations, based on data in this supplemental report are presented for the City Council's consideration. 1. The City or Orono adopt this report as a guide for the installation of sanitary sewer in the Crystal Bay area. 2. The easement acquisition be reveiwed with the property owners prior to proceeding with the project. 3. The following Project Schedule be implemented for this project: 2 0-4857c Receive Supplemental Preliminary Report Continue Public Hearing Order Plana and Specifications Approve Plane 6 Specifications and Set Bid Date Receive Bids Hold Assessment Hearing - Set Bond Sale Hold Bond Sale - Award Contract Start Construction Complete Construction .. i n-48') %C December 10, 1984 December 10, 1984 December 10, 984 January 28, 1985 March 1, 1985 March 25, 1985 April 22, 1985 April 29, 1985 September 13, 1985 APPENDIX A DETAILED COST ESTIMATE SANITARY SEWER 825 Lin.ft. 8" PVC, 0'-8' deep @ $15.00/l.f. $12,375.00 1,230 Lin.ft. 8" PVC, 8'-10' deep @ $11.00/l.f. 20,910.00 2,870 Lin.ft. 8" PVC, 10'-12' deep @ $20.00/l.f. 57,400.00 850 Lin.ft. 8" PVC, 12'-14' deep @ $22.00/l.f. 18,700.00 425 Lin.ft. 8" PVC, 14'-16' deep @ $25.00/l.f. 10,625.00 270 Lin.ft. 8" PVC, 16'-18' deep @ $27.00/l.f. 7,290.00 970 Lin.ft. 8" PVC, 18'-20' deep @ $30.00/l.f. .9,100.00 635 Lin.ft. 8" PVC, 20'-22' deep @ $40.00,'l.f. 25,400.00 250 Lin.ft. 8" PVC, 22'-24' deep @ $45.f0/1.f. 11,250.00 50 Lin.ft. 8" PVC, 24'-26' deep @ $5C.00/l.f. 2,500.00 35 Each Manhole @ $1,200.00/ea. 42,000.00 55 Lin.ft. 8" DIP, outside drop @ $100.00/l.f. 5,500.00 214 Lin.ft. Manhole overdepth 2 $100.00/l.f. 21,400.00 83 Each Service wye branch @ $50.00/ea. 4,150.00 2,200 Lin.ft. 4" CISP service pipe a $16.00/1.f. 35,200.00 200 Lin.ft. 4" CISP riser pipe @ $30.00/l.f. 6,000.00 180 Lin.ft. Jacking 4" CISP and casing @ $50.00/l.f. 9,000.00 200 Lin.ft. Jacking of 8" DIP 6 casing @ $200.00/l.f. 40,000.00 50 Lin.ft. 4" DIP force main @ $15.00il.f. 750.00 LUMP SUM Cut into existing force main 9 $6,000.00/L.S. 6,000.00 LUMP SUM Lift station @ $60,000.00/L.S. 60,000.00 3,000 Ton Rock stabilization @ $10.00/ton 30,000.00 Total $455,550.00 5% Contingency 22,775.00 $478,325.00 + 25% Legal, Eng., b Admin. 119,575.00 Total Construction Cost $597,900.00 - 4 - 0-4857c APPENDIX A (CONT'D RESTORATION 5,000 Cu.yda. Common excavation @ $5.00/c.y. $25,000.00 5,500 Ton Class 5 (100% crushed) @ $7.00/ton 38,500.00 2,200 Ton 2341 bituminous mix @ $20.00/ton 44,000.00 132 Ton AC-1 bituminous material for mix @ $200.00/ton 26,400.00 10 Acres Seed with topsoil @ $4,000.00/acre 40,000.00 175 Each Clear and grub tree @ $140.00/ea. 24,500.00 Total $198,400.00 + 5% Contingency 9,920.00 $208,320.00 + 25% Legal, Eng., 6 Admin. 52,080.00 Total Construction Cost $260,400.00 -S- 0-483 7c i 4* aersTAL wtr LAKE NSWKTOMA 23 News 00.10 1 a f low noI"1M1 Iq 1S1 171 ,t / 10 It A ` CZ' 13, 141 I51 IN �. f - e tt f21 to lei 21 491 t 131 S I , 1 111) !O 1701 161 131 a•1 3 _ 141 17 / 1 ` 51 lei L e11� \ to 10,1 ! a) .i e i I/ , v III rw ! ml r —low y S O � • 11l1 W Opp 2 0 L 1 : e. e e •'•'lo�n,e�o,w,s s �1''S e�s,l'>•"wa 1 : s • v— I FIGURE _ _ �: _ _.._.. �- �1 �'� •�1 =''ice ORONO• OW&SOTE snwtMe lrrdl Mrwrovsr I M its r t•► t•► its tw•I -w. t tt ► t • � 1 1. !!rt —r-r-r- r ! f 1 1 i f t k i I0titifat twf•fil• sk fw wt r �/ 3 k t t f 1 s t i s i ! + . 1 t t f f ! ! 1 t t t t t I t i A I t I L ► t• t•t•t •1• I1 •�•1w}t*fwiwlM!tl • { i f i i ! 1 l;/ii ! i+ I► 1 1 I t a i l 1 f t "'----� ;• iT I ► 1 t I 1 + t F' f. f f I l / i t ! ! l- COMAL war laf39 W M ITOtMI I II W ! • l �- p t � 21 fiw t 4 w) ' ::3 � Z FIGURE 11 ■ •rats OROw. M KSOTA C "WAL My r a salt" to v1 sett ►ll"AwLtIm" V[il V DUMIN,,. '. MIY CHAIRMAN WRIIAML ARMS1RON6 C0,0 IAWYON-HR($ IIA NAMCYLANDONRASSIIIAUM KANS IRNLSTI MOLLINGS SC RUDY SOSCMWI Iz MINH JOSEPHR SIOIN. JR D/L OVAIN G MATCH UTAH J SINNIIY JOHNSTON LA JOHN TOWER It J'M SASSIR TENN MARK ANDAIWS M DAY (,ARY HART COIO 51IVLND SYMMS, IDAHO HOWARDM MLTJINIAUM OHIU CHARIIS GIIASSIIY IOWA DONAIO W RI[Gll. JR. MICM R0S!RI W KASTEN, W'IS DANIEL RAIRICK MOYNIHAN NY DOA OUAYLI. IND J JAM[ S IRON N(OR SLADI GORTON. WASH STIRMIII Slll. STAf/ DIRECTOR PACKARD M BRANDON. MINORITY STAIF O7RICTDA Walter Benson I City Manager City of Orono Box 66 Orono, Minnesota 55323 'United Metes ,mate COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET WASHINGTON, D.C. 205 10 COUNCIL MEETING DecerIt)e r 4, 1984 Our File 4332170019 DEC 10 198" CITY OF ORONO Dear Walter: 1 Attachad find copies of Mrs. Wkanen's etter and our reply. I hope this can be resoled peacefully. Good luckl L Senator RB/jh Enclosure 77 DEC 7 %4 1! r OF Oi i)� October 26, 1984 Rudy Boschw; t z U.S. Senator 310 Brenner Bldg 419 N. Roberts S1. St. Paul, MN 55101 Dear Senator Roschwitz: ! live in Crystal Bay in the Village of Oronu. I know you are familiar with the area b--caiise one of my son's baseball teammates saw you this summer in Minnetonka Beach. I think you'll agree it is one of the most beautiful areas of Minnesota. For the first time that I can remember, (and I've lived in Crystal Bay since 1965), our comrnuni tv has a problem. It is a serious problem that endangers the health of our community. The Village of Orono is proposing the installation of a sewer system in Crystal Bay. The community needs it, the septic tanks are backing up and sewage is running on the streets. Unfortunately the residents are very upset with the way Orono is hondlin the assessment. It is split between 83 houses at a cost of $13,000 plus hook up of 2,000, per house. The 83 houses were choosen because thev may qualify for low income grants but now the Village tells us there is no Federal funding available. When I purchased my house in 1983, the `jilloge told us that no sewer would be put in without federal help. I am not the only home owner they told that to. A neighbor put in a new droinfield last December on the wort; of the Village that no sewer wns coming through. My house is the last house included on the plan. We have a large lot, .8 of or, acre, and could easily put in another septic system. Several of the neighbors have even larger lots. They conveniently excluded the more wealthy commun;ties and the Minnetonka Art Center (for the reason of lot size). But now, us lower income families, ore stuck with a tremendous assessment and no federal help. What can we do? We have met as a community and will challenge the Village at their next meeting, November 13th. We are not ready to accept their proposal. I feel the Village is negligent in their concern with the deterioration of Crystal Boy's septic systems. They dented the sewer to be put in in 1963, when it would of cost only $1,000 per resident, t%ecause of pressure from the wealthy cormunity. There are other issues involved, such as widening the roads, which included in the $13,000 figure. Can you comment on our situation, and do you know of any funding available for this problem? Sincerely, Mrs Randolph T. L_ukonen 1085 South Brown Road Wayzata, MN 55391 AI'1 V C•'/415.,. N ylr r., .l AyAN v1 u,451N4NO tul0 IA.v Rw CI.n 15 4A 1,ANl'I IANOON AAllsto. IV rAr.. fAN15t 1 'r(NIINf,S S! —0-II0SCNWII1 IrINN M111.01 S,DIN ,A Oft ,NA•Nt, NAt(. UTAN 1 111141111 NIN4510N 1A IL" IOWIA fix 1W )AS51N IIMN MALT ♦Nt1A1 WS N OA■ (.AAI NAAI Colo 111.I49) 61U.S IDANb NOWAf1Oy Y/IIINf1AUY 0.4.0 CH1111IS GAASSIif, IDWA DONA•D W Ml G11 jet YrCN Allil Al W AASTIN WIS DAIuf1 fAIAN.t AADL N,NAN M I b AN OVAIII INO ! JAM, IRON Mosel SLAW GOAICIN, WAS., STI/NIIM full $I&" OIAICl O11 Alf "JW M \RAN'JON. U:NOWTV SIAff DMSCTOM Mrs. Randolph T Lukanen 1085 South Brown Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Dear Randolph: United Mates senate COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET WASHINGTON. D C. 20510 Dec-:nn -r 4 1984 My office contacted orom and talked to a gentleman in the planning department. According to him, the decision has not been made as to the sewer or its assessments. 'lbere will be public hearings whidi you can attend and express yourself. orano is trying many avenues to try anri yet the cost down to the residents. If you Cali. the City Hall, they can explain the various methods they have considered. They can also explain why the Art Center was not included or the higher inccIme- families - (they evidently were trying to qet_ funding for you)• If I can assist you further, 1:leas,L crxltal-t rtr_. rely, n Rudy Hosdiriit� Unit4td States'Senator RBi jh 1/ C NNHCUITTWLAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 26, 1984 PAGE 1 ATTE NCE 7 • PM The Orono Counci 1 met on the above date with the fol lowing Rt I - 1- members Dresent ! Mnvnr lAI1t lPT _ rniinni '. mnmhArc Frahm. Adams, and Hammerel. Councilmember Grabek was absent. City Attorney Radio, Public Works CITY OF ORONO Coor:linator Gerhardson, Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder Sutton represented the City staf. 7:00 PM APPEARANCE MARTY JESSEN - HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE DISTRICT Marty Jessen was present. Jessen gave the Council a status report on the Hennepin County Noerenberg Park Project. Jessen stated that a committee has bees established and will meet at the FWBI on Thursday, November 29, 1984, at 4:00 p.m. Jessen noted that the two Orono representatives have been very helpful in giving background on the park. Jessen stated that the County will be accepting bids on the restoration of the gazebo. Jessen noted that the restoration work will done the summer of 1985. Jessen noted that the County has made available to the City, copies of the will regarding the Noerenberg Park. CONSENT AGENDA* Councilmember Frah-, moved, Councilmember Adams seconded, to approve the Consent. Agenda*, with all staf f reports concerning these items to be attached to an original copy of these minutes on file ir. the City Clerk's office. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0i. APPROVAL OF MINUTES* Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember Adams seconded, to approve the minutes of the regular Orono Council meeting held November 13, 1,384. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT Jo Ellen Hurr was not present. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that Hurr had contacted her and noted that no board meeting was held by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District in November, therefore there was nothing to report. Mabusth noted that the next board meeting will be held December 5, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS There were no Planning Commission comments. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments from the public present. TITES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD KOVEMBRR 26, 1984 PAGE 181b LAKE MINNETONKA HOMES 155 WILLOW DRIVE SOUTH (COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE) APPROVAL OF STREET NAME 6 FINAL PLAT APPROVAI, - RESOLUTION Richard Conry was present to represent Lake Minnetonka Homes. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that the new street name has been changed to Manor Circle so that. it will not conflict with other street names. Mayor Butler moved, (-uuncilmember Adams seconded, to approve the street name of MANOR CIRCLE of f Countryside Drive. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). Councilmember Adams stated that the resolution doesn't note that Manor Circle will be a private drive and that Countryside Drive will be a public street after all lots have been developed. Adams suggested that Manor Circle being a private road should be noted in the covenants. Zoning Administ -ator Ma'. sth noted that it is clear in the covenants that are f that any other streets are to be private. Mabus added that in the City resolution it notes that l.Anor Circle is a private road. Councilmember Adams stated that in paragraph four of the resolution that it should note "a separate maintenance agreement to co,?er the maintenance of the private road, Manor Circle". Richard Conry expressed his concern over the resolution which states that no building permits will be issued until the road bed is completed and also a certificate of occupancy will not be issued until all seeding and soddingiscompleted. Conry explained that if the road bed is installed prior to any building permits, new construction would tear up the road. Conry also noted that not allowing certificate of occupancies until seeding and sodding is finished, makes it impossible for anyone to move into a completed home during the months(. November thru March. Conry asked that these conditions be removed or changed. Councilmember Adams informed Conry that the road bed must be in prior to building permits so that emergency vehicles such as ambulances, fire trucks, and police vehicles can get access to the homes. Adams stated that this condition is for the safety I the residents and/or contractors in that area. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that she would do a survey of other Cities to see how they handle the timing of the building permit sand certificate of occupancies. Councilmember Adam_, moved, Councilmember Frah:r seconded, to table action on the final plat approval resolution until the December 10, 1984, council mectinq. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays f(,). MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 26, 1984 PAGE #838 DOUG KL1NT/TOM BERNIER PARTIAL VACATION OF MAPLE AVENUE - RESOLUTION 11699* Doug Klint arrived after the Council had acted on this resolution. #861 STEVEN PAULY 3980 DAHL ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #1700' #869 JAMES PHELAN 1231 WILDHURST TRAIL FINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #1701 WATER RATE REVIEW ORONO RESIDENTS WAYZATA SERVICE AREA SALARY ADJUSTMENT THERESA NAAB* Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember Adams seconded, to approve Resolution #1699, A Resolution Vacating a Portion of Maple Avenue. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember Adams seconded, to approve Resolution #1700, A Resolution Granting A Variance to Steven Pauly to allow the construction of a deck. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). James Phelan was not present. Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed with the Council the final plat. Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to approve Resolution #1701, A Resolution Approving the Plat of HEATHERCROFT. Motion, Aves (4), Nays (0). Mayor Butler noted that City Engineer Cook was not present and that this would be reviewed at the December 10, 1984 meeting. Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember Adams seconded, to approve a salary adjustment for Theresa Naab from $7.00/hr to $7.28/hr effective December 3# 1984. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES PROPOSED LEGISLATIVE BIENNIUM* Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember Adams seconded, to approve the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Proposed 1985-86 Biennium. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). LIQUOR STORE OPERATING RESULTS* Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember Adams seconded, to approve the liquor store operating results three months ended June 30, 1984, r,�?port prepared by Finance Director Kuehn. Motion, Ayes (4). Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVZMBER 26, 1984 PAGE 4 1985 APPROVED BUDGET* The 1985 Budget, as amended by the Council at the special meeting held October 1., 1985, was included in the agenda for information only. REVENUE SHARING REIMBURSEMENT POP BUDGETED EXPENDITURES* Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember Adams seconded, to apI ove the revenue sharing reimbursement for budgeted expenditures report prepared by Finance Director Kuehn. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). SEPTEMBER, 1984 MONTHLY YEAR-TO-DATE SUMMARIES OF RECEIPTS, DISBURSEMENTS 6 BALANCES" Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember Adams seconded, to approve the September, 1984, Monthly Year - to -Date Summaries of Receipts, Disbursements and Balances. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). RECENT COURT ACTION INFORMATION ONLY Tom Radio stated that this item was for information only. PUBLIC EASEMENT FROM BURLINGTON NORTHERN Tom Judd and Art Johnsen were present. Bill Wolfe of 3255 Crystal Bay Road was present from the Crystal Bay area. Tom Radio stated that the houses do have access from Crystal Bay Road. Radio stated that if the Council decides to acquire this public easement, that the City must decide how to assess the public that benefits from this. Radio stated that it would be approximately$315 per property owner (8 property owner._). Tom Judd asked the Council to provide a public easement from Burlington Northern Railroad for the residents of the Crystal Bay area that don't have access to the rear of their properties. Judd stated that Burlington Northern RR has stated that they will not grant a private easement but would be willing to consider a public easement to the City of Orono and Minnetonka Beach. Judd explained that the railroad has already done the surveying and easement work, so that the costs to the City would be minimal. Judd stated that the easement is needed for the public health, safety and welfare of the area, so that emergency vehicles can reach the properties legally. Judd stated that the City does receive a benefit and should bear some of the cost. Bill Wolfe of 3255 Crystal Bay Road stated that the easements are needed and that all the residents in the area are in favor of the public easement. Wolfe stated that he would be willing to pay the $315 assessment. MINUTES OF THt: REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 26, 1964 PAGE 5 Council had no problems with acquiring the public easement as long as there was no expense to the general tax payer, and the benefitting residents pay for the easement. Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Hammerel seconded, that the City acquire the public easement and for the City to absorb the legal fees to -date and any fees after this will be assessed against the project cost. Residents to pay for easement to the City and City in turn will send a check to Burlington Northern Railroad. City will not maintain easement, but the responsibility of the property owners to maintain easement, with maintenance to be consistent with past practices. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). POLICY REVIEW - COLLECTION OF FEES City Attorney Radio recommended that this item be discussed in executive session. SIGN ORDINANCE REVIEW Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed with the Council the temporary sign ordinance. BILLS* Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember Adams seconded, that the All Funds Accounts and Liquor Store Accounts be paid. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). ADJOURNMENT 9:15 PM The Orono Council adjourned the regular Council meeting at 9:15 p.m. and entered into executive session. ;lotion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor COUNCIL MEETING To: Mayor Butler DEC 10 1964 Orono Council Members From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning AdministratorCITY OF ORONO Date: December 4, 1984 Subject: Final Subdivision Approvals - Resolutions - Consent Agenda #778 Jo Ann Grimes, 4720 North Arm Drive West #805 John Hallson, 2640 Watertown Road #806 Willow Properties, 2600 Wayzata Blvd. 4839 Jeff Stebbins, 2195 Watertown Road #879 Malcolm MacKay, 1145 Sixth Avenue North #882 The Farm at Long Lake, inc., 1765 West Farm Road The applicants cited above have all complied with the conditions of preliminary approval and have submitted all required documents. Staff recommends approval of all final subdivisions based on the findings and conditions set forth in each appropriate resolution. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF HCHANF.Y ADDITION COUNCIL MEETING UEC 10 i5-ea CITY OF ORONO WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Cite Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision by Jo Ann Grimes, the subdivider; and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the RR-113 zoning district finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that will allow its use as a single family residence to be fully developed without the need of any variances; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1. Dedication of drainage and utility easements. 2. Creation of a section of private road shown on the plat as Outlot A. 3. Concurrent with the creation of this section of a private road, the Subdivider has dedicated to the City a Road and Utilities Easement granting to the City permanent access, improvement and utility easements over said Outlot. 4. Dedication to the City of a Flowage and Conservation Easement providing for limitations on the use of wetlands and/or drainageways described therein and shown on the plat as "drainage easements". 5. Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fee in the amount of $200.00. 6. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat easements and covenants in the amount of $75.00. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City C cuiic:i 1 of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of McHaney addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the condition that the aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office on or before June 10, 1985 together with a certified original copy of this Resolution and executed copies of the easements and covenants noted above. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, this loth day of December, 1984. ATTEST: City Cler Mayor / P.-- 0200 if MC HANEY ADDITION "' °°` "°00, UK = A •L'� 2 � -•.mow �..�„rS�... � i City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF HALLSON ESTATES FILE #805 COUNCIL MEETING DEC 10 1984 CITY OF ORONO WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision r^gulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered tLe application for a subdivision by John Hallsor, the subdivider; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1. Dedication of drainage and utility easements. 2. Dedication on the plat of right-of-way for a public roac?, shown as Watertown Road. 3. Payment of the City of a Park Dedication Fee in the amount of $100.00. 4. Payment to the City for the legs 1 review and f i 1 ing of the plat easements and covenants in the amount of $75.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Hallson Estates, Hennepin County, Minnesota; subject to the following conditions: 1. The Public Works Coordinator must approve new access for Lot 2 prior to issuance of a bui !ding permit for new residence. 2. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office on or before June 10, 1985 together with a certified original copy of this Resolution and executed copies of the easements and covenants noted above. so City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. The approval granted by this resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, this loth day of December, 1984. ATTEST: Dorothy t;. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor SON ESTATES GORDON R COFFIN CO., INC 0 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COutMNCIL MEETING NO. DEC 10 i98,: A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PTAT OF WILLOW PROPERTIES ADDITION GITY OF ORONO FILE. NO. 806 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision by Willow Properties, a co- partnership consisting of W.D. Gagne, Paul G. Roberts, Albert B. Yngve and Harold VandenElzen, the subdividers; and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the RR-lB zoning district finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that will allow each lot to be fully developed without the need of any variances; ar.d WHEREAS, the City Council hereby approves a special. exception to Comprehensive Sewer Plan, Rural Sewage Treatment Policy No. 7 to allow sewer service to I.ot 1, Block 1, Willow Properties Addition based on the following findings- 1. The sewer project (LS-67-1) was assessed and constructed in 1967 prior to the adoption of Orono's Comprehensive Sewer Plan. 2. The Property is already serviced by an existing sewer service stub. Connection will not invel ve extension of the municipal line. 3. Unit capacity is available within the municpal line. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4. The property was assess( r un i t s i n the LS- 67-1 sewer project. 5. Zoning will remain rural and all development will occur in strict conformance with the rural district requirements including use, lot size, setbacks and all pertinent rural performance standards. 6. Lot 1, Block 1, Willow Properties is able to sustain an on -site septic system. WHEREAS, Lot 2, Block 1 and Out lot B are not platted as part of this scheme but are intended for future development. A11 future development of these properties shall be subject to all requirements of current zoning and the Community Management Plan; and WHEREAS, the subdividers have completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1. Dedication of drainage & utility easements. 2. Dedication on the plat of right-of-way for a public road, shown as Old Crystal Bay Road, Willow Drive 'forth and U.S. Highway No. 12. 3. Creation of a new private road shown on the plat as Outlot A. 4. Concurrent with the creation of this private road, the Subdivider has dedicated to the City a Road and Utilities Easement granting to the City permanent access, improvement and utility easements over said Outlot. 5. Execution of a Subdivider's Agreement providing for instal lation of the private road per City's specifications up to the access drive to Lot 1, Block 1, willow Properties Addition as a condition of subdivision approval. City of ORON0 RESOLUTION OF THE CIT', COUNCIL NO. 7. Submitted written notice to the City advising that 2 of the 3 sewer units already assessed against the property shal 1 be assioned to Lot 1, Mock 1, Wil low Properties Addition. 8. Payment to the City of a Park Cedication Fee in the amount of $200.00. 9. Paym--nt to the City for the legal review and filing of the flat easements and covenants in the amount of $75.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Willow Properties Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota; subject to the following condition: 1. Plans for the private road must be approved by ti^, City prior to construction. 2. The aforesaid plat shall h- filed by the City of Orono wi t'h the Hennepin County recorder's Office on or before June 10, 1985 together with a certified original copy of this Resolutions and f,xecuted copies of the easements and covenants noted above. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary ;_o file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota, this loth day of December, 3984. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor • Henn. Cc Mcr, cr Nor►heoi' count. of Sec. 33, Twp 118 N., Rpe 23 wee► of 31APM 1 26114 52 Kr- Outlot 8 033 !Vhwoy .+ 133 I 33 i _ r � h O n n I A N East line o/ NE 114 of Sec. 35.... I It I I ~�I � A it pn A f' Sorts► live dtdprrll AaM d of NE IA of Sec 33 t beau 12 c.l 1Mi.'1A�ea�f-� ' pe.A/ 6"54 -fag//.se Of �.orhl of Stcfi«I 33 2 L't. 33 APOO, co,.& CPO 4.10 of,, Ae n/ fsryrr of tt -law* .......... .... h- di 01 AA of SOL 33 so Ado 4:1111 —f , &2 Dft qi PC I 1 4 I LHen- CO cone, at AWIhtosl cne, of Sec- 33, T6;:L 118 N., Rot. 23 Wesi of 5thPM Z 2634.32 c 180-44 33 33 NI Eas"" Of NE 114 01 Sec 33 -.4 It <E-Y^ it � r� rl% U . . Sm.Oi h,- -- t, 1 0 A., 1,or 33 IL se.0 South liew of of NE QN!," sr,_ 33 26 bv U. S. Highwc 3 33 Nwriplr y SL No ALme --9*12bel. 1089.11 12 t546 I? -,j, W,77- I'll 46 OALE AUV;Tf(#N ya ifZ rarfer W secitoft 33 w 3rw x PT A6r r,fhr -a v Aac /Z Per .+ Dar. Me 5raas�o,dKRS7y O 0,,,,fat 8 .e City of ORONQuNciL MEETING RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO, A RESOLUTION APPROVING rHF. PLAT OF BALSAWCOD FILE NO. 839 DEC 10 1984 CITY OF ORONO WHEREAS, the City of Orono is r. municipal corporation organizes: and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WH€1RLAS, ..te City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Ccuncil has considered the application for a subdivision by Jeffrey P. Stebbins, the subdivider; and WHLR LAS, the City Council has granted variances to Section 10.03 Subdivision 6 (b) Combination of Separated Parcels prohibited based on the following findings: 1. Lot 2, Block 1, Balsawood with a total of 3 ages of area has been found to have suitable and adequate area on both sides of an intersecting private driveway so that a principal structure, a primary and alternate on -site septic system can be located on the property meeting all standards for rural development within the City. 2. The exi lri aay was placed without any consideratiL iture development f the sLaject property and je relocated if neceE3ary. WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, includiri. 1. Dedication on the plat of drainage 6 utility easements. 2. Dedication on the plat of right-of-way for a public road, shown as Watertown Road. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3. Dedication to the City of a Flowage and Conservation Easement providing for limitations on the use of wetlands and/or drainageways described therein and shown on the plat as "drainage easements". 4. Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fee in the amount of $400.00. 5. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat easements and covenants in the amount of $75.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Balsawood, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the condition that the aforesaid plat shall he filed by the City of C,rono with the Hennepin County Recorfier's Office on or before June 10, 1985 together with a certified original copy of this Resolution and executed copies of the documents noted above. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota, this 10th day of December, 1984. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler 'uyor City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING I METES 6 BOUNDS SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE RF.ARRENGEMENT FOR MALCOLM S. MACKAY FIDE NO. 879 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corperation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision by Malcolm S. MacKay, (hereafter "the subdivider") of a property legally described as follows: All that part of Lot. 1, "Auditor's Subdivision Number 291, Hennepin County, Minnesota", lying East of a straight line drawn parallel with and 725 feet East of, measured at right angles to, the East line of West 1/2 of Southwest 1/4 of Section 26, Township 118, Range 23, and lying North of a line drawn parallel with and 366 feet North of, measured at right angles to, the South line of Section 26, Township 118, Range 23, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said County. Part of Lot 1 is subject to certain rights and restrictions as contained in deed Doc. No. 126904, Files of Registrar of Titles. Also All that part of Lot 1, "Auditor's Subdivision Number 291, Hennepin County, Minnesota" lying East of a straight line drawn parallel with and 1055 feet east of, measured at ri?ht angles, to the East line of the west 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 26, Township 118, Range 23, and the same extended, and South of a straight lini drawn parallel with and 366 feet North of, measured at -ight angles to, the South line of Section 26, Township llf , Range 23, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for saic County. 41 COUNCIL MEETING City of ORONO 1-1 L c, 1 0 1984 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ORONO NO. Part of Lot 1 is subject to certain rights and restrictions as container] in deed Doc. No. 126904, Files of Registrar of Titles. (hereafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the City for a metes and bounds subdivision for division and combination purposes. NOW, THEREFORE•., BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the metes and bounds division of a lot line rearrangement. for Malcolm S. MacKay as shown on the Certificate of Survey by Mark S. Gronberg dated December 3, 1984 and attached to this resolution subject to the following conditions: 1. Upon approval of the subdivision by the City Council of Orono the owner of Parcel C as described in the Certificate of Survey referenced above must apply to the City for legal combination for tax purposes with Parcel B as described in that same survey. 2. The aforesaid division as shown on the attached Certificate of Survey shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on or before June 10, 1985 together with a certified original copy of this resolution. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the division has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota, this loth day of December, 1984. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor iJ City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL m RESOLUTION APPROVING A METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION OF A I.OT LINE REARRANGEMENT FOR THE FARM AT LONG LAKE, INC. FILE. NO. 882 COUNCIL MEETING DEC 10 1984 CITY OF ORONO WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for subdivision of Lot 16, Block 1, The Farm at Leng Lake by The Farm at Long Lake, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, (hereafter "the subdivider"); and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the City for a m*,tes and bounds subdivision for division and combination purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the metes and bounds division of a lot line rearrangement for the Farm at Long Lake, Inc. as shown on the Certificate of Survey by David R. Krueger of the Clark Engineering Company dated October 24, 1984 and attached to this resolution subject o the following conditions: 1. Upon approval of the subdivision by the City Council of Orono, the fee owners of Lots 15 & 17, Block 1, the Farm at Long Lake and Tract G, RLS No. 1275 muss. apply to the: City for legal combinations with the newly created parcels described in the Certificate of Survey referenced above as follows: a) Parcel A to the combined with Lot 17, Block 1 The Farm a%- Long Lake. b) Parcel B to be combined with Lot 15, Block 1 The Farm at Lorg Lake. c) Parcel C to be combined with Tract G, RLS No. 1275. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2. As a result of this division and combination, combined Parcel C with Tract G, RLS No. 1275 will be the only property riparian to Long Lake. 3. The aforesaid division as shown on the attached Certificate of Survey shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office on or before June 10, l.985 together with a certified original copy of this resolution. `.i'he approval c,ranted by this resolution shall expire if the division has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a nev:, application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnescta, this loth &iy of December, 1984. ATTEST: Dorothy P1. Hailin, City Clerk Mary C. butler, Mayor COUNCIL MEETING DEC 1 0 198i1 TO: council CITY OF ORONO FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoninq Administrator DATE: December 6, 1984 SUBJECT: #804 Painters Cheek, 4680 Bayside Road - Final Subdivision A) Road Name Request The applicant has selected the following name!; for the plat road; they are listed as to preference: 1st choice = Luce Line Ridge 2nd choice = Randolph Road 3rd choice = Line View Place Staff founu no conflict with the three names selected in review of existing roads in the immediate area and within Hennepin County. Staff recommends the first choice of Luce Line Ridge. B) Refund of Public Road Review Fee You have received a memo from the Finance Department requesting a transfer of $1,000 from the general fund (originally receipted by the Building and Zoning Department for a public road review fee of $2, 100 - see receipt enclosed) to the pare, fund. The applicant has chosen to pay the $1,000 park fee directly and asks merely now that the City refund $1,000 to applicant. Staff has no problem with recommending the refund based -n the following: 1. Staff never authorized staff or consultant time for the public road review. 2. The applicant realized in the early stages of the sk-*ch plan review that the City would not accept tine prof rr.ads as public given the five -acre density and 'ineal footage of roads. 3. The applicant has asked only for a credit of $1,000 and caul(' have asked for a refund of $1,285. Public Road Fee = ;2,100 Private Road Fee = $815 C) Fi^al Subdivision Approval - Resolution The .ipp1 cant has fulfilled all conditions of preliminary apprc _ ar.d ha,, filed with the City all requested submittals required for final s-abdivision application. Staff recommend approval of the plat, eainters Creek, subject to the findings and conditions setforth i:, the enclosed resolution. CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box as GLNERAI. R1:('L'll''f CRYSTAL BAY. MN 55323 NO. 4887 TELEPHONE: 473.7358 + `" 19 (L� Received i ee Le" DOLLARS For i E%J �C� (• c��" •,r c 7L= (J Fund Object Program Div. Amount�t fje-w e,,---L-- BY City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF PAINTERS CREEK FILE NO. 804 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized apd existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision by Painters Creek Development Corporation, ar, I111nois Corporation authorized to do buEiness in Minnesct,., (herei-ifter "the subdivider"); and WHEREAS, on April 23, 1984 the City Council granted approval of the preliminary plat of a 10 unit Planned Rural Residential Development that designated the buili'inr and septic envelopes for each of the residential units (her(:rai*er referred to as "Development Plan"). Each septic envelope mainL-iins a 20 foot setback from each building envelope and boundary line of each unit. Each building envelope maintains the apirove(, setbacks as follows: Front/street setback of 50 feet Side setback of 20 feet WHEREAS, the Development Plan has been found to meet all standards of the Planned Resident.ial Development Cod,-, On - Site Septic Se%,age Treatment Code i-d al other peetinent sections of the zoning a:jd plattinc r,aes that deal %ith the rural development of property within .ne City, so that each pad can be developed as a single family residential unit w-.thout the need of variances; and WHEREAS Outlot C is not vlatted as part of this scheme but is intended for future development. All future development of Out lot C will be subjr^t to all renui rements of the current zoning and Community Manarjruent Plan of the City; and City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. WFIF.PF:AS, the subdivider has completed a' l regoirer:ents of th platting regulations of the City, includi.nq: 1. Dedication of drainage and utility easements. 2. Dedicationan the Flat. of right of way for a F)ublic road, shown as County }Iighwz-,y 1.o. 84. 3. CreaLion of a new private road shown on the plat as Outlot E, to be know henceforth as Luce Line P:dae. 4. Concurrent with the creation of this private road, +-he Subdivider has dedicated to the City a Road and Utilites Easement granting to the City permanent acc:ass, improvement and utility easements over. said Out'ot; the Subdivider has created non-exclusive ingress, egress, drainage and utility easements over said Out.lot in favor of all abutting and/or benefiting lots including a declaration of certain m-intenance covenants wherein each of the abutting anti/or benefiting lot owners covenants and agrees to permanently maintain and pay the cost of maintenance for saild private road. 5. Dedication to the City of a Flowage and Conservdt1k:n Easement providing for limitations on the use of wetlands arc:/or drainageways described therein and shown on the plat as "drainage easements". 6. Dedication to the City of an open space casement ever. Outlots A 6 B to fulfill. the density requirement for 10 residential units in the RR-lA rural residential zoning district requiring five acres of dry land per unit.. 7. Cre-tion of private covenants placinq restri Lons on the use of each homestead unit, private road and shared commons area. 8. Execution of a Subdivider'. ?ement providing for installation of certain improv%. s as a condition of subdivision approval. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. NO. - -- 9. Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fee in the amount of $1,000.00. 10. Payment to the City foi the legal review and filing cf the plat, easements and covenants in the amount of $75.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BF IT RESOLVED, that the City Ccnnci 1 of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Painters Creek, Hennepin County, Minnesota; subject to the following conditions: 1. Outlot U is yet aside for the septic expansion: and exclusive use of the property located at 4740 Baysi-le I<oad, legal ly described as the 1,,est 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 31, Township 118, Range 23 North except that part of the South 226 feet thereof lying East of the West 249 feet thereof and West of the East 180 feet thereo;. 2. Access to residential units 1. tnrou%ih 9 shal 1. be via Luce Line Ridge. Access to residential unit 10 must be approved by the Hennepin County Fighway Department prior to issuance of building per -nit for new residence. 3. The aior-said plat shal l he filed by the C).ty of Oi,no with the Hennepin County Recorder's: Office on or before June 10, 1985 together with a certified original copy of this Resolution and exeLu:ed copies ofthe Easements & Covenants as noted above. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire .i. the plat has not -been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to f i le a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Co..nci 1 of Grono, Minnesota, this loth of December, 1984. ATTF,, , Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk ry C. Butler, Mav^.r TO: Orono Council COUNCIL MEETING FROM: Jeanne A. Mabustn, Building & Zoning Admini@ECat8r?054 DATE: December 7, 1984 SUBJECT: #816 bake Minnetonka lion-?s, .55 Willou Di SoOF D Q U Subdivisicn - Resolution Issue of C-repletion of specific improvements in relation to the i.ssuant-._ of building permit and certificate of occupancy. Please .review the section, of the platting code. Enclosed for your information. Section 11.16, Subd 2, states building permits cannot be issued unless a road is improved to a point adequate for vehicul .r access for prospective occupants and emergency vehicles. lbivision 3 states that in no case will a certificate of occupancy be seed if the road has not been satisfactorily complc Staff still commends that the grave 1 base work he installed pr to issuance of ..iilding permit but that t1ye developer need not pave the raa(' until that road has had a ch-ir:ce to settl not at the time she City is asked to issue a certificate of occupancy for the first completed house. As for sef!ding and sodding, I ha-,- underlined the section of t'.� code that notes an alternate procedui for a developer if the time of year will not permit seeding and sodding. The code says the developer must submit acceptable security to assure the required seeuinq. The City may then grant a certificate of occupancy prior to c^^inletion of required seedin,-T. Mr. Conry has Eubmitteu a bond that cc ,r s only the cost of the road construction, not the seeding and pond construction. Iwould suggest that Conry submit additional securit the seeding is not completed at the time a contractir asks for the fi :rti f. icate of occupancy. I will amend that uert: -)n of the resolute : ._o _nclude .c alternate procedure per Section i .. 31 , S,ibdivi sioi. f,13. Staf. s coi.,acted tt cities of Wayzata, Plymouth, and Minnetonl':-, �o surve, *heir procec.ur-s in dealing with required improvt-rrL;its A) Wayzata inquires all. improvements completed before the issuance of a building permit.. D) Plymouth ' .. no standards --very Ft (, developer -)une' 1-- s' -)ff person was emb,rrasbed to admit there were no :ts but a.'., they are buying four wheel drive ars for thk: ;_pect_ons department next year. C) Minnetonka will not issue a certificate cif oc-up. -ji until the first layer of bituminous-)aviny n.ts bei2n instal' § ll.12 Subd. 5. Governmental Units. Governmental units to which these bonds and contract provisions apply may file in lieu of said contract or bond a certified resolution or ordinance of that governmental unit agreeing to comply with the provisions of this Chapter. Subd. 6. Failure to Complete Required Improvements. For subdivisions for which no performance bond has been posted, if the improvements are not completed within the period specified by the City in the resolution approving the Final Plat the approval shall be deemed to have expired. In those cases where a performance bond has been posted and required improvements have not been installed within the term of such performance bond and resolution approving the Final Plat, the City may thereupon declare the bond in default and require that all improvements be installed regardless of the extent of the building development at the time that the bond is declared to be in default. Moreover, the City may withhold building permits and certificates of occupancy for lots in the subdivison until the required improvements have been installed. In the event that the City undertakes the installation of the equired private improvements, the City by doing so, will not undertake the subsequent maintenance of those private improvements. Subd. 7. Acceptance of Dedication Offers. Acceptance of formal offers of dedication of streets, public areas, easements and parks for which the City thereafter will be responsible, shall be by resolution of the City. Acceptance of deeds and easements gra-ting to the City open spaces, flowage and conservation easements, underlying public road easements, utility easements, shall be by resolution approving the Final Subdivision Plats, which acceptance shall not be deemed to constitute or imply acceptance of a formal dedication of those properties for which the City thereafter would be responsible. The approval by the City of a Final Plat shall not be deemed to constitute or impl; acceptance by the City of any streets, easement or park shown on said plat. The City may require said plat to be endorsed with appropriate notes to this effect. SEC. 11.13. INSPECTION OF REQUIRED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS. Subd. 1. General Procedure and Fees. The City may inspect required public and private improvements during construction. The applicant shall pay to the City an inspection fee based on the current City fee schedule for public and private improvements required as a result of subdivision approval. If the City finds upon inspection that any of the required improvements have not been constructed in accordance with the City's construction standards and specifications, the subdivider shall be responsible for completing the improvements and no building permits or certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the required improvements have been completed by the subdivider. wherever the ORONO CC 44`+ (4-1-84) Subd. 2. The subdivider shall be required to f i le a warranty bond with the City, prior to the issuance of the certificate of satisfactory completion, in an amount considered adequate by the City Engineer and in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney in order to insure the saLisfactory condition of the required public and/or private improvements, including all lot improvements on the individual subdivided lots for a period of one year after the date of the issuance of the certificate of satisfactory completion. SEC. 1.1.15. DEFERRAL OF REQUIRED PUBLIC OR PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS. Subd. 1. The City may defer at the time of the approval of the Final Subdivision, subject to appropriate conditions, the installation of any or all such public or private improvements as, in its judgment, are not requisite in the interest of the public health, safety and general welfare, or which are inappropriate because of the inadequacy or lack of connecting public or private improvements. Subd. 2. whenever it is deemed necessary by the City tr• defer the construction of any public or private improvements required herein because of incompatLble grades, future planning, inadequate or lack of connecting public or private improvements, or for other reasons, the subdivider shall pay his estimated share of the cost of the future improvements to the City prior to the signing of the Final Subdivision, or the subdivider may pest a bond insuring completion of said improvements upon demand of the City. SEC. 11.16. ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS AND CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY. Subd. 1. When public and/or private improvements are required for a subdivision, building permits and certificates of occupancy may be issued only subject to the approval of the Co.)rcil and shall be provided for in the subdivider's agreement. Subd. 2. Building permits will not be issued to any lot which lot has access only onto proposed public or private street unless such street has been improved to the point so that it is adequate for vehicular access by the prospective occupant, by Police and Fire Department and emergency vehicles. Subd. 3. In no case will a certificate of occupancy be issued to any building on any lot in the subdivision, which lot has I ccess only on a new public or private street until a certificate I f satisfactory completion has been issued for that public or private street. ORONO CC 4')1 (4-- -H4 5 11.31 A. Double Frontage Lots. Double frontage and reversed frontage lots shall be avoided except where necessary to provide separation of residential development from traffic arterials or to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation. B. Access From Any Arterial Roadway. Lots shall not, in general, derive access exclusively from an arterial roadway. Where driveway access from any arterial roadway may be necessary for several adjoining lots, the Council may require that such lots be served by a combined access drive in order to limit possible traffic hazard on such roadway. Where possible, driveways shall be designed and arranged so as to avoid requiring vehicles to back into traffic on any arterial roadway. Subd. 6. Soil Preservation, Grading and Seeding. A. Soil Preservation and Final Grading. No certificate of occupancy shall be issued until final grading has been completed in accordance with the approved final subdivision and the lot precovered with soil with an average depth of at least six (6) inches which shall contain no particles over two (2) inches in diameter over the entire area of the lot, except that portion covered by buildings or included in streets, or where the grade has not been changed or natural vegetation seriously damaged. Topsoil shall not be removed from residential lots or used as spoil, but shall be redistributed so as to provide at least three (3) inches of cover on the lots and boulevards. B. Lawn -Grass Seed and Sod. Lawn -grass seed shall. be sown at not less than four (4) pounds to each one -thousand (1,000) square feet of land area. The seed shall consist of a maximum of ten percent (10%) rye grass by weight and a minimum of ninety percent (90%) of permanent bluegrass and/or fescue grass by weight. All seed shall have been tested for germination within one (1) year of the date of seeding, and the date of testing shall b�- on the label containing the seed analysis. All lots shall be seedE' from the roadside edge of the unpaved right-of-way back to a distance of twenty-five (25) feet behind the principal residence on the lot. No certificate of occupancy shall be issued until respreading of soil and seeding -)f lawn has been completed; exce t that dWrina the period of d cannot be sown, ne ro ert own shall s greemen writing tQ assure that resareading o soil and see in of lawn_._will be done dur in immediate fal owin an in season _J hI111 eave a securit in P to the City or rfnr nce I- uc a r i t The zrevelopFr may choose to include final lot grading and required lawn grass seeding improvements in a subdividers agreement and shall leave a security in a form acceptable to the City for performance in such an amount as shall be determined by the City. Sod may be used to comply with any requirements of seeding set forth herein. ORONO C,' 4 `_15 ( 4- 1 -- R 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF COUNTRYSIDE MANOR 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, t!-.t r i ty of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Ainnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has aOopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision plat by Lake Minnetonka Horres Incorporated; 1, Minnesota Corporation, the subdivider; and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the RR-1B zoning district finding that each lot is of a size and coif iguration that will allow its use as a single family residence to be fully developed without the need of any variances; and WHEREAS, Outlot A is not platted as part of this scheme but is intended for future development. The lots as shown in this second stage of the Countryside plat have been designated so as to assure future lots within Outlot A access by interior plat roads. WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1. Dedication of drainage and utility easements. 2. Creation of a new private road shown on the plat and to be known henceforth as Manor Circle. 3. Concurrent with the creation of this private road, the subdivider has dedicated to the City a Road and Utilities Easement granting to the City permanent access, improvement and utility easements over said Frivate road; the Subdivider has created non-exclusive ingress, egress, drainage and utility easements over said private road in favor of all abutting and/or benefiting lots including a declaration of certain maintenance covenants wherein each of the abutting and/or benefiting lot owners covenants and agrees to permanently maintain and pay the cost of maintenance for said private road. Page• l of .', City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4. The subdivider has dedicated to the City a road and utility easement granting to the City access, improvement and utility rights over that portion of the temporary cul de sac not included in the dedicated right of way of Countryside Drive. 5. All five lots created by the current plat, Countryside Manor 2nd Addition, will be subject to the same restrictive covenants filed ,against Outlot A, Countryside Manor that advises all future benefitting property owners of their share in the responsibility of the maintenance and repair of Countryside Drive until that time in the future when the subject road is a through road connected to Old Crystal Bay Road South. The covenants further advise that at. the time of the City's acceptance of Countryside Drive that it will he the benefitting property owner's responsibility to bring that road up to current City standarcls. 6. Dedication to the City of a Flowage and Conservation Easement providing for limitations on the use of wetlands and/or drainageways described therein and shcwn on the plat as "drainage easements". 7. Execution of a Subdivider's Agreement providing for installation of certain improvements as a condition of subdivision approval. 8. Payment to the City of a Park. Dedication Fee in the amount of $1,000.00. 9. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat, easements and covenants in the amount of $75.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Ororo hereby approves the plat of Countryside Manor 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota; subject to the following conditions: 1. Road beds of Manor Circle, extension of Countryside Drive, and the retention pond located within Lots 1 and 2, Block 3 must be installed and approved by the City before the Building Department. can issue a buildinq permit for new construction. 2 of 3 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2. All seeding and/or sodding required by the Subdivider's Agreement must be installed prior to issuance of a temporary or permanent certificate of occupancy for new construction. 3. If the time of year prevents installation of seeding and sodding, subdivider must provide City adequate security to assure completion during the immediate following planting season. 4. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Recorder's Of fice on or before June 10, 1985, together with a certified original copy of this Resolution and executed copies of the easements and covenants noted above. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application witt: the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, this loth clay of December, 1984. ATTEST: City Cler Mayor Page 3 of 3 &VA 1-1f &c/J..� 4,6 rd,'x COUNCIL MEETING DEC 10 19811 CITY OF ORONO City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL MEETING NO. l� 'V'CC DEC 10 1984 CITY OF ORONO A RESOLUTION DENYING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.24 SUBDIVISION 5-B FILE. #820 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, pursuant to State Statutes 412 et. seq, and 462 el seq. the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted zoning regulations for the protection of the public, health safety and general welfare; and WHEREAS, Lonie Fisk (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property legally described as Lots 7 and 8, Block 2, Minnetonka Summit Park (hereinafter property) within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24 5,(B) to permit the construction of a principal structure on a property that contains 10,761.92 sf or 25% of the required 43,560 sf in area and 125 feet or 90% of the required 140 feet of lot width; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the application; the recommendations of the staff and Planning Commission; the comments and written statements submitted by Lhe neighbors and their attorney; the comments and written statements of the applicant and applicant's attorney, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Counci 1 of the City of Orono hereby denies the requested lot area and lot width variances for the property described above based upon one or more of the following findings of fact concerning this property: FINDINGS City of ORONO RFSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1. As of January 1, 1975, the property has been zoned LR-1B, Lakeshore Residential Zoning District, requiring a minimum of 1 acre in area and 140 feet rinimum width. Based on the zoning district's required performance standards, the proposed use of the property as a residential or buildable lot would require the following variances: a) Lot Area required = 1 acre or 43,560 sf existing = 10,761.92 sf or 25% variance = 32,798.08 sf or i5'6 b) Lot width required = 140 feet existing = 125 feet variance = 15' or 10% 2. Prior to 1975, the property was z n%d R-1C, effectivE sinc4:- September 14, 1967, a residential one requiring a minimum of 1 acre in area and 140 feet min,mur, width. 3. Per the assessment polity of 'he 73-1 sewer district, and the performance standards of �-he R-IC district Lots 7 and 8 were each assessed a 1/1 unit. Five other vacant, sub- standard lots within Block 2 of the Minnetonka Summit Park plat were also assessed a 1/4 unit each. 4. From 1965 thr^ugh 1974 Premier Realty was the fea owner of the property. P. cabin or residence constructed sometime in the early 1900's was rented up to the mid 1960'S. 5. In 1974, Home Federal Savings and Loan foreclosed on the mortgage and the real estate taxes remained unpaid on the property. The residential structure fell into disrepair and as a result of a hazardous building action commenced by the C;tv i�- 1976, the structure was razed in that same year. 6. In 1977, Home Federal Savings and Loan filed a lot area and lot width variance application with the City to construct " new residence on the site. The application was denied based on the 2 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. following findings: a) the lots were "too substandard" b)therewerevacant, contiguous lots avaiIablefor combination c)advised applicant of the City's assessing policy in 1973 for this neighborhood which was to have tlht-se substandard lots combined per current zoning standards. 7. The lots were forfeited to the State Land Department in 1981. 8. On January 11, 1982, the City adopted Resolution 1354, releasing the two lots for public sale with the following notice to the public: "Release of these lands by the City Council does not constitute an assurance that eac:, parcel is or wi 11 be approved as a building site. All parcels remain subject to all applicable zoning ordinance provisions, including those regulations providing for minimum lot area and minimum lot width. Substandard parcels may be useable only in combination with other adjoining parcel(s) and/or may be subject to pri)r approval of zoning variances by the City Council." 9. On August 22, 1954, Curtis Fisk of 40 Lakeview Avenue, Tonka Bay, MN 55331 purchased the two lots for a combined price of $7,210.00, Lot 7 at $4, 120.0© and Lot 8 at $3,090.00. Hennepin County Department of Property Taxation conditions all sales of properties either at public auction or over the counter with the following disclaimer: CONDITIONS - Sales are subject to existing leases, to building restrictions appearing of record at the time of forfeiture and to easements obtained by any governmental subdivision or agency thereof for any public purpose. The appraised value does not represent a basis for future taxes. Contact the city where the land is located for details of building codes or zoning laws. ALL PROPERTY IS SOLD "AS IS" AND MAY NOT CONFORM TO LOCAL BUILDING AND ZONING ORDINANCES. THE COUNTY MAKES NO WARRANTY THAT THE LAND IS 'BUILDABLE'. ALL SALES ARE FINAL, AND NO REFUNDS OR EXCHANGES ARE PERMITTED." City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 10. On February 27, 1984, Lonie Fisk of 723 'Water Street, Apt. 103, Excelsior, MN 55331 and son of Curtis Fisk applied for a lot area and lot width variance. 11. In a sworn affidavit and in oral comments made before the Planning Commission and Council of the City, the applicant has sworn "That, prior to purchasing the property, t had no notice that there might be zoning defects relating to the property. That 1 checked with an official of the City, who did not inform me that there were zoning defects with respect to Lhe property." Applicant has produced no other evidence regarding the identity of the official to the alleged conversation. 12. At the Council meeting of October 29, 1984, staff advised the Council that both the Zoning Administrator and the Building Official had worked with Curtis Fisk on two hrejious zoning application reviews. The two most likely officials of the City to receive such calls were never questioned by Lonie Fisk or Curtis Fisk as to the buildability of the combined lots. 13. The current pattern of development for the Minnetonka Summit Park plat per the LR-lB Zoning District Standards effective January 1, 1975, have been as follows: a) 1974 - combination of 4 lots - total area .86 acres b) 1976 - combination of 3 lcrs - total area .59 acres c) 1979 - combination of 2 lots - total area. 59 acres d) 1979 - combination of 4 lots - total area .79 acres e) 1981 - combination of 5 lots - total area .62 acres f) 1983 - combination of 6 lots - total area .89 acres g) 1983 - combination of 2 lvts - total area .52 acres 14. The applicant contends the City will deny him equal treatment and protection undo - the law if we deny him a building permit because the City has approved building permits for lots requiring the same degree of variances if not greater than those sought by applicant. Staffs review of the City's pact actions on variances granted for the substandard, severed lots reflects the following: 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. a) #802, John Munsel I - LR-lB 1 acre variance area, 190feet width; proposed area 10,000 sf or 23%, proposed lot width 50feet or 36%. Merton Crooker, fee owner of the property for over 30 years maintained a summer cabin that lacked sanitary facilities, sewer was not available. Crooker applied to Lhe City for building permits to upgrade the principal structure and was consistently denied on the basis that any impto,:ement would intensify the use thereby creating potential hazards to the public health, safety and welfare. The City advised Crooker that sewer would have to be made available to the property before improvements could be made to the structure. On July 13, -)93, the City approved Resolution 1294 including the Crooker pt�;)erty in a limited sewer project. Crooker could have connected to sewer and made the necessary repairs to the exisitng structure with building permits for no zoning review would have been required. The cabin remained vacant and was vandalized and was razed per a hazardous building action. Mur.sell applied for lot area and lot width variances to construct a new residence. The City approved the variances based on many of the findings noted in Resolution 1294 and in addition advised the applicant to petition the City for release and private sale of an adjacent lct of similar size owned by the City. The surrounding neighborhood (Highwood) is old and already established, the development size of this lot is consistent with nearby Highwood neighborhood. b) #800 Thomas Burnevik - LR-lC 1/2 acre minimum area, 100 feet width - proposed area 7,500 sf or 35%, proposed width 50 feet or 50% - Once again under one owner for many years, City refused improvement of existing cabin until sewer was made available. The property was included in a limited sewer project and was assessed a sewer unit io 1983 and a water unit in 1982. Burnevik had to apply for lot area and lot width variances because the existing structure was to be removed and a new residence relocated on the property. c) 11780 Gerald Bloms - LR-1B 1 acre minimum area, 140 feet width - proposed 17,9h0 sf or 39% the lot area is consistent with all single developed lots in the Forest Arms Country Club W City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Addition. A11 of the 16 lots within this plat have been developed as single lots - all have been assos!3ed a sewer unit. d) #658 Steve Coddon - LR-lB 1 acre minimum area, 140 feet width - proposed .44 (.05 deeded to City for road) or 44%, 128 feet or 9.5%. The property was tax forfeit and approved fer release and sale to public by the City. The property was assessed a sewer unit in the 73-1 sewer project. The lot is the same size as the developed lot next door but smaller than the lots more recently platted in the Pirates Cove plat on the north side of the access road. e) #808 Gary Nunnally (third renewal variance application) LR- 1C 1/2 acre minimum area, 100 feet width, proposed 11,296 sf or 52%, 50 feet width or 50% lot area and lot width variance required to build new residence on substandard lot that already had an existing residence connected to sewer. This is an older, established lakeshore neighborhood, the lot is consist-nt with the majority of the developed lots in the surrounding neighborhood. f) #731 Charles Hommeyer - (renewal variance) - LR-lB 1 acre minimum in area, 140 feet width - proposed 22,525 sf or 52%, 100 feet or 71%. A residence had existed on the property for over 50 years and the property was assessed for sewer unit in the 7 3 - 1 sewer project. Applicant has an additiDnal 12,504 sf in lot area divided from building site by an unimproved d,-d:cated road that could not be credited but is used as part of developed lot. The building site is consistent with current ;attern of neighborhood development in the Minnetonka Summit Park neighborhood. g) #607 Robert Bredeson - LR-1B 1 acre minimum area, 140 feet width - proposed 23,000 sf or 53%. The property had an established residence on the property connected to municipal sewer. The owner wanted to build a new residence and relocate the new structure on a unique peninsula lct. The lot is larger in area than the majority of surrounding lets in this older established neighborhood. h) #664 Steven Posnie--k - LR- 1C 112 acre minimum area, 1 ii0 E. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. feet in width - proposed 12,870 sf or 49% in a: cd and 50 fuel or 50% - A cabin had exi ted on the property and was removed in December of 1971. The lot has been assessed for sewer and ha; I--n in single separate ownership for many years. The building Site is consistent with the current pattern of neighborhood development. A11 lakeshore lots on Baldur Park, Road are developed singlo lots as the Pcsnick lot. 15. On October 29, 1 9P4, at a public heari;,g on this particular issue, the louncil requested a legal opinion from the City Attorney. The City Attorney advised the City Council that after review of the relevdrt Minnesota state case 13w, as well as case law from other states provided by attorneys for the applicant and nEighbors, there was no prohibition against a denial of the variance under these circumstances. The City Attorney further advised the Council that the questions presented in this case have never been addressed by the Minnescta Supieme Court; thus, the matter is an open question. The City Attorney, However, further advised the Council that case law From the states of Illinois and New York upheld denial of variances under facts similar to this one. Pdrticularly relevant to those court decisions was th fact that there had been offers to purchase the property, which .ouid have protected the landowner from any loss investment in t:,e land. 16. At that same meeting, the Orono City Council directed staff to draft a resolution of denial based upon the following findings: a) The property can be plit to it reasonable al lowed use; it can be combined with the adjacent property; and there is an outstanding offer to purchase by the adjacent property owner. b) The intent of th� application is contrary to the setter and intent of the Orono Comprehensive Plan. c) The development and/or granting of thu variance would set an adverse pcecedent in the City. d) The applicant/purr'haser should ha✓w had knowledge of the 7 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. zoning code requirements prior to purchase, Any hardship seems to be self imposed. e) This is a tax forfeit property. f) A total of one-half sewer unit was charged indicating intent on the part of City that the lot is substandard. g) No ie I sewer assessment was laid against this property them gain indicating the substandard status of the propel h) The property falls short so far of the zoning standard that it is too great to enable justification of granting of the variances requested. i) The property does not conform to the current development pattern of the neighborhood. 17. In denying this application, the City upholds its previous action in denying lot area and lot width variances for the same property (August 27, 1977, - dome Federal Savings and Loan) in consideration of the fo'lowing: a) The same performance standards are still in effect today: LR-1R (effective January 1, 1974) 1 acre area - 140' width R-1C (effective September 14, 1967) 1 ac-e - 140' width b) At the direction of the 1977 Council, the applicant was advised to acquire the vacant lots. An owner of the adjacent vacant lot appeared at one of the publ:.c meetings and was advised to contact applicant to arrange a lot combination. c) The property has not been improved and st i 1 1 requires an excessive area variance. 18. Approva 1 of an app 1 ica;. ion that requi res a 75 per cent City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COI!'NCIL NO. variance to lot area would establish a negative precedent in the future development of the Minnetonka Summit Park neighborhood. A review of the ownership pattern of the remaining vacant lots reveals one, two lot combination and three, single lots. 19. The standards and intent of both the City's Zoning Code and Community Management Plan would no longer have any effect if the City establishes a precedent of approving variances of this degre,. The LR-lB Zoning District alone contains 88 vacant lots, 34 or 39% of these fall within 20-40 percent of the required are . The findings cited in each of the variance applications reviewed in this resolution presented unique circumstances. In review of similar criteria, what is unique about Fisk's request in consideration of the following facts: a) A previous fee owner failed to amend the variance application of 1977 and acquire additional lots at the time they were available. b) There is no structure on the property. The previous -(>sidence was razed in 1976 and had not been in use since the mid 1950's. c) A two lot building site is not consistent with current pattern of neighborhood development. The smallest building site approved since 1975 totaled .52 acres, but that lot had an additional 12,000 sf of land separated or divided by an unimproved public road. d) The property was not assessed a full sewer unit because the property was substandard in 1973 when the sewer district was established. The intent of the sewer assessment policy has been stated for the public record - one quarter unit for each vacant, substandard lot. e) The question of the code standards prior to the city appears fol lowing facts: applicant's knowledge of the zoning to application for a building permit questionable in consideration of the L" City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1. Public notice by both the City and Hennepin County that lots released for sale may not satisfy all zoning standards. 2. The applicant's father and actual purchaser of the lots had worked with officials of the City on two previous zoning applications. 3. The applicant is involved in building construction and should have a general familiarity with development practices. The very fact the property is tax forfeit would strongly suggest to even a building novice that there may be problems with the buildability of a property. 20. The granting of the required variances would result in the following violations of Section 10.08 Subdivision 3.A of the Zoning code with which the applicant must first comply before the requested variances can be granted. a) in review of the factual findings noted above, the plight of this applicant was created by his own actions and has nothing to do with a unique hardship related to the land. b) In reivew of the factual findings noted above, the City finds that the e3sential character of the neighborhood will be altered i a building permit is issued for this property. c) In review of the factual findings noted above, the City finds that to establish a precedent that would allow Beverly substandard lots to be developed to be in complete conflict with the established environmental standards for lakeshore development within - he City and to be detrimental to the public, health, safety and welfare. The City also looks to the broader, environmental principals and goals set forth in its Community Management Plan and the intent of the specific zoning dis-riot when dealing with matters related to the public, health safety and welfare. Issues involving the public health, safety and welfare are not only resolved in securing the obvious City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. traffic and drainage concerns of surrounding property owners but the City also must provide its citizens with a designated and approved optimum level of density, open space and quality of life. 21. The substandard property can be put to a reasonable use by combination with adjacent properties. Donald Meyers, owner of combined lots 5 and 6 adjacent to property on the north boundary line, made an informal offer to purchase the property. 22. On November 20, 1984, Lonie Fisk formally accepted in a written letter submitted to the City, Donald Meyer's offer of $8,500.00. 23. On November 29, 1984, Mr. Fisk advised the City that Mr. Meyers had agreed to honor his offer of $8,500.00. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting hold December 10, 1984. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor 11 TO: Council _%JJJ0IL MEETING FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator ULC 10 1984 DATE: December 3, 1984 SUBJECT: #874 Duane Barth s Mrs. D. Johnstone, 1810 Shadywotyd Y OF O R O N O Road - Variance Zoning District - LR-lC = 1/2 acre Application - Lot Area/Lot Width Variance to Declare a Lot Builddble List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Applicant's proposal and sketch Exhibit F - Plat Map of existing Neighborhood Development Exhibit G - Ten-year Assessment Record Exhibit H - Applicant's Letter (dated 11-11-84) Exhibit I - Planning Commission Minutes 10-22-84 Exhibit J - Planning Commission Minutes 11-19-84 Exhibit K - Manufacturers Literature "Grass Pavers" The applicants are requesting that a 0.35 acre vacant lot be declared buildable. This lot is owned in common but separate for tax purposes with the adjacent 0.40 acre lot containing a house. The 0.35 acre lot contains the garage and access driveway for the house on the larger lot. Please refer to the memos of October 17, 1984 and November 13, 1984. To recap the major issues and information reviewed by the Planning Commission: Width Area Required Width Required Lot 21 (w/garage) 15,100 sf 21,780 60.5' 100' (0.35 ac) (0.5 ac) Lot 22 (w/home) 17,24E sf 21,780 60.5' 100' (0.40 ac) (0.5 ac) Proposed Hardcover Lot 21 22.7% (using porous "grass paver" r:iveway) Lot 22 16.4% (using porous "grass paver" driveway) (No sidewalks or decks shown on proposal) 1. Access - Existing house on Lot 22 uses access across Lot 21. Proposal is for a separate access for each lot on County Road 19, which wi l l require an access permit from Hennepin County. 2. Sewer - The house on Lot. 22 is connected to sewer. According to cur sewer as -built maps, no stub exists to serve Lot 21. Both Lot 21 and Lot 22 were assessed for footage and area, but only Lot 22 paid the $225 plant charge. A stub would have to be jacked under County Road 19 to serve Lot 21, and this cost would have to be borne by the developer. 3. Water_ both lots were assessed a footage charge and a unit charge, indicating they were considered as two sepa-ate building sites. Put, our as-builts show only one water stub to serve the two lots. Aga i:., installing a water stub to Lot 21 would be the responsibility of the developer. 4. Assessment History - Refer to Exhibit G - It appears from the tax history of the propoerty that at least since 1977 the two lots have carried a roughly equivalent taxable market value for the land portion, rather than an incremental value for the vacant lot. According to the previous assessor, these properties would have been scheduled for review again in 1965 and the vacant lot would likely have been placed on an increment value scale based on our current zoning policies. (With the increment. scale, and these lots considered as a single building site, the first x feet would be valued at a higher rate than the additional footage.) Based on the above, it appears that the lots have been taxed as two building sites. 5. Ownership History - The Johnstones have owned both Lots 21 and 22 since they inherited the properties from Mr. Johnstone's father in 1942. The lots have been separate for tax purposes since the beginning. 6. Hardcover Proposal - The applicants have proposed to build on Lot 21 and expand the house on Lot 22 per Exhibit E. They propose to use a porous pavement ( "Grass Pavers" - see Exhibit K) on the driveways in order to meet the hardcover limitations. The City Engineer has reviewed the literature and specifications of the product and in his opinion, if properly installed, the "Grass Pavers" would not be considered hardcover, hence both Lots 21 and 22 could adequacely meet hardcover requirements. 7. Setback Variance Required - The existing house 01. Tot 29 is setback only 3.1 feet from the property line of Lot 21. In a similar application, (Smiley on Pheasant Road) where the existing house was actually over the lot: line, the applicant was made to rearrange the lot lines to create 10' setback. In the Johnstone application, since the lakeshore setback pushes the new house site on Lot 21 a good distance nearer the road than the existing house, staff suggests that a side setback variance for the existing house is in order rather than a lot line rearrangement. B. Existing Garage is proposed to be removed when a house is built on Lot 21. 9. Lot Area Comparison With Neighborhood - Exhibit F shows the existing developed lakeshore lot sizes for the east side of Shadywood Road from County Road 51 to the Coffee Bridge. Existing lot sizes range from 0.22 acres to 1 .00 acres. Lot 21 in question is 0. 35 acres. Of 25 properties in this strip, 11 (or 44%) are equivalent to or smaller than Lot 21. Lot 22 in question, with the house, is 0.40 acres. Again, 11 of 25 (or 44%) are equivalent or smaller. Also, overall, 17 of 25 (or 68%) are smaller than 0.50 acre. There are four properties larger than the 0.74 acre of Lots 21 and 22 combined. The average existing density is 0.48 acres/building site (11.89 acres 25 properties) excluding the two lots in question. Based on the above, a case can be made either way i.e. a significant percentage of neighboring properties are equivalent or smaller than the proposal; yet the proposal yields two lots significantly smaller than the average lot area. 10. Similar Applications Which May Be Precedents - what equival nt applications may have set a precedent for this application? The Lorge properties (3695-2697 Casco Point Road )come to mind, with existing lots of about 0. 48 acres (house ) and 0.44 acres (vacant ) and leaving a setback of ±6' for the existing house. As you are probably aware, this was the subject of a lawsuit which was finally settled in favor of the applicant, allowing construction on the 0.44 acre lot but with no other variances granted. Thedif ferences between the two applications would seem to lie only in the magnitude of the lot area and width variances requested. In the Smiley application, again similar to this, a lot line rearrangement was required in order to create a setback, since the existing house extender: into the vacant lot. This also is very similar to the Douglas Smith application in which a commonly owned lot of .43 acres was approved as a separate building site, but with no setback variance required for the existing house. Lot w/House Variance Vac Lot Variance Lorge 0.48 ac 0.02 ac or 4% 0.44 ac 0.06 or 12% Johnstone 0.40 ac 0.10 ac or 20% 0.35 ac 0.15 ac or 30% Smith 0.71 ac none 0.38 ac 0.12 ac or 24A Smiley 0.65 ac 0.35 ac or 35% 0.59 ac 0.41 ac or 41% .he C'ounci 1 has consistently approved vacant lots as buildable with lot sizes of 0.40 acres, in recent applications with lakeshore and non- lakeshore situations, including: Clifford -- 4760 North Shore Drive, 0.39 acres; Brockopp - 993 Wi ldhurst Trail, 0.40 acres; Haapa la - 4015 Dahl Road, 0.39 acres. Alsc a number of smaller lots have been approved for building sites where a house or cabin was previously existing. If this application is approved, it may set a precedent by allowing a common 0.35 acre lot to be declared buildable, hence a cursory review of the LR-IC district indicates a potential of as many as 10 or 15 new building sites might be created from existing common ownership lots that couldn't be built on if required to more closely meet the 1/2 aerf requirement. SUMMARY The proposal requesting you to allow Lot 21 as a buildable site would appear to meet ?11 performance standards and criteria except lot area, lot width, and side setback for the existing house on Lot 22. The properties have been kept as separate tax parcels by the owners, and the assessment records indicate the vacant lot has been taxed as a separate building site. Lot 21 by itself would be equivalent to or larger in size than 44 percent of the lots in the neighborhood, as would I.ot 22. The question to the Council is, what minimum lot size do you consi:ler acceptable in the 1/2 acre sewered zone, presuming the land is vacant and no other land is available? In the one acre zoning district, you seem to feel that 0.40 acre, or 40 percent of the required area, is acceptable. Is a smaller acreage acceptable in the 1/2 acre zone, given that, essentially all the hardcover and setback performance standards are met? Is therea certain limiting minimum area that should not realistically be surpassed? Staff has calculated that a 50' lakeshore lot in the 1/2 acre zoning district will need a minimum of 12-13,000 sf in a- ea in order to build a minimal home and garage meeting all the setback and hardcover standards. A 100' lakeshore lot in the 1/2 acre zoning district would realistically need to be at least 16,000 sf in order to satisfy the standards. Based or, these numbers, staff would suggest that minimum realistic lakeshore lot sizes in LR-lC range from 55% to 75% of 1/2 acre. Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission recommended denial by a5-1 voate, for the following reasons: 1. A variance to side setback for the existing house would be necessary. 2. Although the lot was assessed footage for sewer, City maps indicate no stub was every placed and the plant charge was never paid. 3. The lot areas proposed are signif icantly less than the aver.,cae lot area in the neighborhood. 4. Approval of this application would set a precedent since the proposed lot sizes are less than those approved in previous similar applications. 5. The lots have been historically used as a single building site, indicated by the locations of the driveway and garage. Staff feels on the other hand, that the reasons for denial are far outweighed by the following justifications for approval: 1. The proposal ran meet all hardcover requirements of the LR-IC zoning district. 2. All setback requirements for the new lot can be met. 3. From the tax record it appears that the lot has been valued and assessed as a separate lot, not incrementally as part of the adjacent property. 4. The applicant has owned the property since before the current zoning went into effect. 5. The property has been assessed for sewer. 6. The propoerty has been assessed for water and was assessed a separate water unit for each lot. 7. The lot area is consistent with many other properties in the neighborhood and is equivalent to or larger than 11 of 25 lots in the neighborhood. Conditions of approval should include: 1. Granting a variance to the setbacks for the existing house on Lot 22. 2. No other performance standard setbacks allowed for either lot i.e. both must meet all hardcover and setback requirements. 3. Payment of park fee for new lot in the amount of $4�0. 4. $225 sewer plant charge to be paid with building permit along with standard SAC charges, etc. 5. Applicants to bear the expense of bringing sewer and water to the property if no stubs exist. 6. Maximum hardcover of Lot 21 to be 2,280 sf including roofs, decks, driveways, etc. Staff will draft a resolution reflecting your decision for action on the January 14, 1985, Council meeting. J CITY OH' ORONO" VARIANCE APPLICATION AppTcation Fee $100.00 After -the -Fact Fee $200.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address _ 1810 Shadywood Road, Orono, TUnnesota Property Identification Number (P.I.D. ) 1711723210026 Please check one -- Is the property abstract or torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name Duane Barth & Mrs. D. Johnstone Phone 471-8457 bla i l i n g Address 2385 Shadywood Road, Box 15, 'Navarre, Minnesota 55392 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- OWNER Name Mrs. D. Johnstone Phone mailing Address 1810 Shadywood Road, Orono, Minnesota 55391 Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of lard. Lot 22 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT USE OF PRGPERTY Present 'Zoning District Residential Present Use of Property Plated Lot Residential Other (specify) --------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated CO;,nLtu,,'— r---- a 130,000.00 Describe request in detail: New }mw --------------------------------------------------------------------------- VARIANCES REQUIRED 75_2f1(1 Lot Area 6Q_ Lot Width 1,880 Hardcover+ Drive%wav 103t80-800 sq, ft Setback Variances ( Front Side Rear) Other . --�� zcs .__.15,200 --- HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations:. Lot can't be sold as abuildable lot___ P.ESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: Lot size is 4.800 smaller than present zir; REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603Government Center 348-3271) Stampe(l, l ecaI sized envelopes (M 10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. Plat Map. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is : -)t complete if the above information has not been included --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied istrue and correct to the best of his/her no/ Applicant's signatu L 'r LZ Date 9/27/84 OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. i Owner's signature %I� '� •�/ Date 9/27/84 Applicant. must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of ect() month. ••1 7i 't' N _{ lb 1 eel _ 4w 1 0 M y ° rIts Tq 1 \ o r • s ; IMFop :top X MW r /,,..ice •�� �+ . S . ` r -• i •t �I_ ;� • \ Ix '�� � so S� � •'. i� c 9+6 `. s W I• r• P .6 f • Ao-'%� r►i w D;wa 'IATF 09/28/81, BATCS 001 1.8 17-117-23 21 0007 ADC P ::NA ME STATE OF MINN rE« CITY OF OPONO NAAF 1000 38 17-117-23 21 0024 PROP ADrlR U1780 SHAOYU*OD RD 'lWlNfQ NAME GLENDINE ANN HARRIS 'AAPAYFR GLENDINE ANN V.ARRIS 14A"E.'♦OD0 1760 SHADYWOOD ROAD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 21 0027 MOP AOCR 01610 SHAnY41000 RD C'»9:ER NAME OONALD R JOHNSTONE ETAL Tty'PAYER D R JOHNSTONE NAr:F/ADOR 1810 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 24 0007 PROP ADOR 01855 SHAOtW000 RD OWHER NAME M a K SALDEN TAXPAYER MAPK R SALDEN NA#11/ADOR 18S5 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN S5391 PROP AOLHI OWNFR NAME TAVPATER TOTAL EATCH 001 00012 07AME /ADOR MENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 17-117-23 21 0008 0179S SHAOTW(DD RD L a 0 PILGRAM LEROY A DELPHIE PILGRAM BOX 81 NAVARRE Mil SS392 38 17-li7-23 21 0025 01790 9.iADYWOOD RD 0 A H EI55 DAVID H EISS 1790 SHADYWOOC RD WAYZATA MIl 55391 38 17-117-23 24 0001 01625 SHADYW000 RD RnOERT G RUUD ETAL ROi,ERT G RUUD 1825 SHADYWOOD FD WAYZATA MH 55391 38 17-117-23 24 0015 J1820 SHADYWOOD RD CHARLES 0 PYLE JR ETAL CHARLES A PYLE JR 1820 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 REPORT NO. P1435401 PAGE I 38 17-117-21 21 0023 01770 SHADYWOOO RD W a L GUSTAFS,ON RICHARD A CATHERINE BLACK 1770 SHADYWO.^.8 RO S WAYZATA MN 5�-3 41 38 17-111-23 21 0C.6 01810 514ADYWCOO PO DONALD R JOHNSTONC ETAL 0 R JOPASTOHE 1610 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA :'W SS391 38 17-117-23 24 0006 01835 SHADYWIMO FD GERALD A TO'JRVILLE JR A 141' E GERALD A TOURVILLE JR 1835 SHADYWOC'0 RD OR ONO Pr 55391 38 17-117-23 24 0016 01840 S11ADY14900D RD JOHN J BURKE ETAL JWN 1 BURKE 1840 SHAOYW:)OO R04i WAYZATA Pni 55391 71 FL. ♦III � � rk 61 ._ � r•.rr i firat,r nt' F+1:^vpy ` for Pradl(-y A. HOY' of tots 21 'ind 22, Shadywxol Hennepin County, Minnerot:i heresy certify Lr.&L this is a true and correc L re; resentati..i. )." a s*-n,e; :n•• Dour-tariet of Lola 11 and and the location of sll _ t r. b .ildingr La : e Win. it .1_1• r not purport to aaa+ ats.er 17-::rv"xar.ta or encmacnr+el.ta. Scale ! 1 incr, - L:. test Da to i �I une V. 1584, A e e�•:�� 20.�iy !-?f-fY o iron marker Fork :. :ront,erp zng.neers and land .rv- ors LonR Lake, Ainne sots EAcelsior Design & Developement Inc. 2385 Shadywood Road " Navarre, MN. Orono Planning Commission Orono City Hall 1335 So. Brown Road Orono, MN. Planning Commission Members: I have applied for a building permit for construction of a new home on Lot 21 Shadywood Addition which is lo- cated adjacent to 1810 Shadywood Road. This building permit application has been referred to the Planning Commission for recommendation because the lot which was platted in 1928 no longer meets the minimum lot size requirement of the new subdivision ordinance which was subsequently passed by the Orono City Council. 'There are seven 60 foot lots in a row in this area which are all below the size required by the new subdivision or- dinance and have homes constructed on them. Some of these homes were constructed or remodeled after the adoption of the new ordinance but permits were ,ranted because the lots were existing oefore the new ordinance was adopted. Most of these existing homes located north of the prop- erty in question cannot meet the minimum ground cover re- quirement of the new ordinance. The construction on the lot lying immediately adjacent to this site greatly ex- ceeds the ground coverage requirement of the subdivision ordinance being almost double the coverage proposed an our lots. I have purchased Mr. and Mrs. Donald Johnstone's home on lot 22 and the adjacent lot 21. This purchase is contingent upon my receiving a building permit for construction of a new home on lot 21. If this permit is t granted it will i'age 2 be economically unfeasable for me to meet the Johnstone's asking price for the two lots. It is my intent, if the sale is closed, to bui,,: a new, quality home on lot 21 and to re- model the existing home on lot 22. Both of these homes will feature quality construction and will be designed with ex- eriors which will be a credit to the neighborhood. I have remodeled and constructed many homes in the Lake Minnetonka area which have been attractive improvements to the neighbor- hoo•is. This can be attested to by many of my previous customers and neighbors of these home owners. This project will also be an attractive addition to the neighborhood. The construction which we propose will meet all of the set- back requirements of your new ordinance and will also meet the ground cover requirement in the 75 to 250 foot zone which was previously questioned at your last meeting. Thes= two lots are the largest of the seven 60 foot lots in the immed- iate area. A summary of our building proposal follows: Lot 21 Lot size 15,000 s£ Lot size 75' to " W zone 9,120 sf Proposed building _Aze 1,839 sf Proposed decorative porous 235.4 sf paving block driveway 428 sf X 55% Total ground coverage 2,074 sf = 22.77�,'; 25% maximum allowed in ordinance = 2280 sf Lot 22 Lot size 17,000 sf Lot size 75' to 250' zone 11,100 sf House addition 040 sf Existing house in 75' to 250' zone 534 sf Proposed decorative porous 349 sf paving block driveway 635 sf X 55% Total ground coverage 75' to 250' zone 1,825 sf - 1.6.4% 25% maximum allowed in ordinance = 2775 sf 2,775 sf Pap,(- 3 As can be seen from the site plan submitted with this letter we can meet all setback requirements for any propesed con- struction as well as maximum allowed ground coverage as re- quired in your new subdivision ordinance. The only item in question is allowing the building to proceed on lots which are below the size required for new subdivisions. Since these lots are larger than any of the 60 foot lots north of them on which homes were built or remodeled and since the lots have been platted prior to the adoption of your newest zoning and subdivision ordinance we feel that it would be a definite, discriminatory hardship on the Johnstone's to deny the building permits on either lot. The Johnstone's purchased these two separate building lots at different times and have purposely maintained the separation of properties from a tax standpoint as well as assessments. They have paid non homestead real estate taxes for the past 40 years on lot 21 and have paid a full assessment for sewer and water mains on both lots. The plant service charge for lot 21 will be paid at the time of issuance of the building permit which is normal proceedure. Based on the previously stated faCtS we respectfully request your approval of this application for building permit on lot 21 and the subsequent permit for remodeling of lot 22. Thank you for your co. 'rat' n. ITiane Barth, Excelsior Design and Developement Inc, Z Q E..00 -1 . � ��_ "►3a1 ,t. 4. "Oyt . '2'halywoo,4 t, `., neo:n Counti, Minnesota !cooIN � f 2! w ZZ r \ i bsrstj, certify teat this is a t-ue and c--rtc;, np:esentsti..:. :)f a sunny of tat boutrisriss of Lots 'tl &Dd "?,-%&4y%0041 &W the looat+x. u. ell er.;stinq bAildarss turvon. :t doss not purport to snow otr,er lr.=rvveynts o- encrcacrre-.ta. Su10 t 1 Inca - 40 fast Date t vuns 17, 1984, qr v..1 .rr.� • p• izvn marker OORWY 1. CJFFD CO., IN. Ax�-/ alesz� Uordm • Coffin Mg. . Mart S. Cronberg MS. No. 177;5 bng ins • r1 sad Land SuM ]4!8 Long Lake, Kimw rota 35 IS Jol'i lip, WAG It.1•.sWewe Ix i4- W—WIT I � l �J\ CY, l .�) � ,� ICI ��J,�r N � _ ~ +�� I I •I '� , � -•' �%/ �i �r -. \ ``+ •_� � � �- ' '" � •., • +� / - ��I � N I IN,�_L , � I . I c ��'�� Ft i�� / -� 'I i �\ \ ` l• • ' l• / �� -� �N N" I �.I gel 00P/ J/ \ ♦ I ( •y�_l ,A •\\�``J <1 �. ���'%'� �• N a = —L7.� �:• S/� ofss we Wo 1 �'r — rsr S.`MN� of 5�1Ody c' • :. --� ` � � V �, � '- / �,i �sf Al 14 cc a • ^� tAr c •.L,Meyf,Mc;;U ti if �-� u : �., �oR, �O %'' ' • Esck rr� ...aj-/�``a _ �\ `.� � . �aE •'+ ••+ •� � � ,. � \ Fri ?�. � Flr � / l� f�\ �� / \� r ' f VAC- C vZ L. ?yv� TA 'M9 LNn eL-be. �WV,<< LA t•forn r TVA. G OOL ? f-,adt. fT Orr^ u• - f3 �•G G 9 sy So 2a-0 /s,ot�o /srg,ol y� 3� �,N 19,��0 /,y�?� -fy yl,,,:"In v? a 0,o /`�a;(� �3/i�i,�i0 ��7g�o 2,yoOwo �9+yoo tv�►>2 �'18•°Z �/� 1�a•,n J7S Z 95 boo 7 2, (,no ,tr I3eo 1 )oN / /.'�a:'�(. `�?)VOO 9 /Z�i 78?+.30 3p_.,o ?ftoo �s voJ r3fat r,t9i.i�1 30�• ?s,Yoc i 4,4 !Gj%V 2P�(opt� 7,32� %4S•`�� ?�,;tc�n /,/L,O _'�!t/pn l'��20 �)7/,9/ rL,;.�oeo,:�c► * y •Y 3S•Sq lN/ goo ��/o� y71s-ntc� 9��c� Io52 .o/ Var (ia 21+2m0Z /yo roo y2,�t�� �(��ip Ja>,i� 1Syon �r w 3ggoo jai N) Soo 5 2 .�i —' 2 (�.��� �,a2o 939, r3 SJl .9 Ll - .4• x4f. g9o. 9 j-- DONALD R.JOHNSTONE 1810 SHADYWOOD ROAD WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 (.�'�p-�-•� AIL 3 S � ��'.I r 1 /� rA i t , '^ � � IC.)O�G 7�ti- ��C. t �l� t'1l.'Y.�-'`r t. �•Z✓1iyt4\a�-�-+1.t.t.l'\. f�la+-\k,M� 1 i L � (�.�--� �: �i..6-�--�. Lti� � � Yes �:.� l� �:.. L �ti:�� J►�.-c�C � � .- .� 1•t—► �1T" V\/ �"� u'��d-1-�I--.1�v1.7a� '�,.�1�.1Y _ I DONALD R. JOHNSTONE 1610 SHAOYWOOD ROAD WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 :Lv\ V4-1� A, XIL Ll )2t laI G ,;� y I-N Till &I-L4 MINUTES OF THE: PLANNING COMMISSION MEI'TING HELD OCTOBER 22, 1984. PAGE 7 i873 LEO CLIFFORD 4760 NORTH SHORE DRIVE VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 8:50 - 8:51 PM 874 D ANE BARTH b JOHNSTONE 1810 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 9:03 - 9:46 PM Leo Clifford was present. Assistant Z(,,ning Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. Chairperson Goetten closed the public hearinq at 8:51 p.m. since no one was pre�;ert in the audience for this public hearing. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gafrroi- stated that the Clifford's want t'.eir lot dec;la-•ed 'buildable. Callahan moved, Sime seconded, to recommend approval a lot arc and lot width variance bsied on the following findings: 1. No r, :her adjacent land is available. 2. Sewer is available and has been assessed for one sewer unit and footage. 3. This lot fits in the the pattern of the existing neighborhood. Motion, Ayes (7), Nays (0). Duane Barth and Mrs. D. Johnstone were present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. Chairperson Goetten announced that now was the time and place for the public hea_ing concerning a variance for Barth and Johnstone. The, following were present for this public hearing: Don Peterson of 32 Interlachen Court Dave s Holly Eiss of 1790 Shadywood Road Charles Pyle of 1820 Shadywood Road Mrs. Johnstone stated that she has always paid separate taxes thinking that someday they would be able to build on this lot.. Johnstone stated that they have paid a lot mr)re taxes because they are separate lots. Johnstone stated that they have paid the sewer and water assessments for this lot too. Assistant. Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that the lot was charged a sewer lateral charge. MINUTES OF T11F. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD OCTOBER 22, 1984. PAGE 8 Callahan stated that the Planning Commission needs to see the overall plan for both lots. Kelley stated that both lots have hardcover problems. Kelley stated that he too would like to see plan-, for the whole development. Rovegno stated that if they can build two houses meeting all the hardcover and other codes of the City, then he could look upon the application favorably Don Peterson stated that this is a buildable lot which has been platted according to the building codes at the time it was platted. Peterson stated that sewer was subsequently put in and this lot was assessed as a buildable lot. Peterson stated that the water main was subsequently put in and again this lot was assessed as a buildable lot. Peterson stated that Mrs. Johnstone has paid taxes on this lot as if it was a buildable lot. Peterson stated that the City has changed the rules since this has been platted to requires new subdivisions to meet the code, but does the City have the riy` t to go back in and change the rules on someone that already has a platted lot under the old subdivision rules. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that. the special assessments on a piece of property never in and of themselves declares the lot a buildable lot. Mabusth stated that the applicant was charged two lateral assessments- because of the lineal footage of the property. Mabusth stated that the value of that lot is never assessed as a buildable lot, but assessed as a vacant lot as part of the improvements for the existing house. Mabusth stated that the assessor can break down those special assessments. �h ;, Charles Pyle of 1620 Shadywood Road state(' that. he is concerned about the division of the lot. Pyle stated that everything on the south side of this lot is larger than t. -oposed lot. Pyle stated that there are several trees that may have to be removed that concern Adams stated that the fact that the house is on one lot and the garage is on the other lot creates a problem and suggests to him that it has been treated for years as a single lot. Adams stated that if this lot was platted before the City codes were changed he might feel differently. Mrs. Johnstone stated that she pay.. $1,500 in taxes for the lot with the existing house, and $1,400 for thv other vacant lot with the garag4. MINUTES OF THE PIJINNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD 0('TO1iI'R 2?, 1984. PAGE 9 Rovegno stated that 2,275 sf of hardcover would be allowed with no variances to hardcover. Rovegno stated that if the applicant can place two houses on the two lot and meet the hardcover regulations and all other code, then the Planning Commission would probably look favorably an the application. Chairperson Goetten stated that the Planning Commission would like to see the assessment history of the properties, the tax history, and the overall showing all hardcr)ver. Sime moved, Adams seconded, to table this application to allow staff and applicant to bring in more information regarding the sewer and water assessment history and overall plan of the project. Mc' -ion, Ayes (7), Nays (0). APPROVAL OF MINUTES Sime moved, Callahan seconded, to approve the Punning Commission Minutes of September 17, 1934. Motion, Ayes (7), Nays (0). REPROSENTATIVE TO ATTEND COUNCIL MEETING McDonald volunteered to attend the Council meeting of November 13, 1984. ADJOURNMENT 10:C9 PM The Planning Commission adjourned at 10:09 p.m. DEFEND GRASS r'i. For what purpose are MONOslabs` intended? A e concrete grids are intended mainly to -- reinforce turf, making it pussible for green lawns to withstand wheels and feel. prevent mud, making off -the -road veni,,le trails and construction sites mud -free and dust -free regard:ess of weather. 0. Are grass pavers only for lawn parking? A. No. The concrete grids are also used to rein- force soil against mud and erosion. 0. Will MONOslab' pavers be available during the energy crisis? A. Yes Cement is made of rock and clay, so MONO - slabs• should be abundantly available for prompt delivery to job site Asphalt however is derived from petroleum, which is in short supply 0. Can MONOslabs' be used instead of asphalt for paving? A. For perking tors — Yes. For driveways and minor roads — Yes Fof n,yhways an major sUecls — No 0. Where can further iolormation be obtained about concrete turf and soil reinforcing grids? A. From FEGKT MUD 0. Are A"ONOslab' turf and soil grids a new development? A. No. MONOsIab• concrete paver grids, devel- oped in Europe, have proven their capabilities and reliability for ten years. They are, however, newly introduced to USA and Canada. 0. Do the turf and soil reinforcement grids re- place concrete or asphalt pavements? A. Not entirely The concrete grids are not in- tended for high speed road traffic They are ideal, however. for overflow lawn parking lots and for erosion or mud control. 0. When can the concrete grids be laid? A. In any weather and at any temperature, even on frozen base, but not into muck. Hand laid in p,ce — anybody can do it 0, Now are areas reinforced by grass pavers drained? A. Water akA ihr ug_h the grids down into sub- soil, thus elrminatrnq puddles and icy patches Underground drainage is seldom required. and s orm water run-otl is minimized HOW TO U S V.. STEP 19 For heavy loads bulldoze one foot below hn fished grade For light loads bulldoze one -'calf tool below finished grade STEP 2. AA�-C''�G.�? Spread and tamp -or -roll six inches of crushed rock or crushed concrete, for heavy vehicle base course. Not required for light loads, such as automobiles roa MUw vENrCLE STEP 3 Cncss SeCI!On view Or mSra!1alion lo, heavy and hOhl vrhq le! teG.t I For heavy loads (trucks) spread and lamp -or - roll or:e inch sand bed on the six inch ballast course. For light loads (automobiles) spread and tamp -or ro . one inch sand bed dtr^ctly on the sub -grade AVLl :1'. .j�� !�'"�...• r=yam M'� ,,. L•'�•. rI AAA I. � � ��� ' ..I STEP Aw 4 1� m Level the paver grids on the sand bed. Keep them "pencil thickness" apart. FINAL STEP Re2r!r `c• - cr.. If a lav✓n is desired please request the illustrated leaflet, "How to estab- lish and maintain lawn, turf and ground ivy on MONOslab• grass pavers." • %I�! '�j�': jJ.'�� ' t � i ' 4 ,E t ' Sri` it •J �T. � � 1. � ! l ( , t -c,t •fir t .: . -t Concrete grass pavers grids permit cnu.. gency vehicler to approach buildings PHYSIC/;IT L PROFOF N, 0NIOSI-ib TURF AND SOIL F IL-11,41--ORCING GRIDS M[TRIC USA/CAN u 1/CAN use nominal values MEASUBEMfNiS Mmill, actual r .ninal INtomputations r.�.,.� 23Vi .• '' " '-:111n==21t " _ ti �yal ir400mrts r: •_' .� I..ISMvADtayacrp; - r'.' 161n—l%ft :t ai I, ;W: .+t:ieaf 120mw?4�+= 1':IX.:r:�e`': ,• 14SIn—ii}t _H.Inth . r1 area, gross 0 250 sq M i70 sq in 22h sq It 3 grids 8 '.g it area, upper surlatt 0 060 so M 95 so in �h sq It ?5"b of gross area area, base surface 071 sq M 226 so in 71/1 sail m of gross area weight/grid 42 11 to :!- 3 Ib 90 lb depends on water absorption weight/pa!lel; gross ,., 1800 1g 3960 lb 2 tons 1 8 metric tons 2 0 USA; Can tons grids/ lon y 24/1000 1g 22/2000lb 2212000 lb Ion 1000 lb= me ric n ton grids/pallet, 21on. ; 42 4" 42 6 grids/layer 7 la erslpatlel r.,:r.r . , . �.•„4,,, grids/area unit .. " , „ 4/14 M 37544 It a, 4r sq it 10 xres = 4 hectares 40.800 M 60,000 ,..:.r. , . sq = grids • grids/area measure 4000/hectare 16,333/scre 16,000/acre 1 27 grids = 8 sq Yd gridsi linear measure rr }. 1666/1m f 2500/1m 2640/mile 3960/mile 2600/mile 4000/mile laid lengthwise, 24` Ina crosswise, 16" strength, compression 2804e,sq cm 4000 psi 1000 psi per ASTM C140-70 breaking load, transverse set specification and lest procedure sheets absorption, water 208 gm'cc 13//tu It 130,cu it per ASTM C140 10 i 231/2" -d 1 ,I v9 to Top view �- 231/2 'r TF f, T I Boll(':r!; View End view I Side view How to Pi-otect your Landscapes Against Wind & Water °S%abS on � low, 11�1 �i1�1 • To prevent gullies & washouts, reinforce slopes with Monoslab© grids. • To protect streambanks & waterways from scouring by water, ice and flood debris, use Monoslabc grids as revetments. • To stabilize sand dunes & beaches, use Monoslab© grids. • To create vehicular driveways over loose sand, lay Monoslab grids on the sand. • To allow air & water to reach tree roots, surround trees with Monoslab' grids. • To reduce stormwater runoff from large paved surfaces, provide Monoslabs grid soak -through areas. • To prevent rat Infestation of broken stone rip--ap, use Monoslab" grid revetments instead. • To cre :te - q. Auatrallan boat ramps, use Monoslab'` grids. How to Protect your Land6t.. -apes Against Wheels & Feet • To attain firelanes and service drives, without sacrificing greer. areas, use grass turf reinforced with Grass PaverF grids. • To provide for seasonal overflow parking, designate "parking lawns", which are reinforced with Grass Pavers grids. • To protect grass from pedestrians and golf carts, reinforce paths and trails with Grass Paver* grids. • To harden grass against wheel overruns, especially along driveways and at corners, reinforce turf with Grass Pavers grids. MonoslabsO & Grass Paverse are one -and -the -same. • When used primarily to prevent erosion, they are termed Monoslabs#. • When used primarily to rein- force grass turf against wheels and feet, they are termed Grass Pavers#. • To prevent aircraft "bogdowns" adjacent to runways, reinforce airport turf with Grass Paver1' grids. Ask for your free "Landscape Architect's Packet", containing illustrated booklet, specification sheet, and list of 26 "how-to" leaflets. Also ask for a quotation, for MonoslabO' Grass Paver@% grids delivered anywhere in USA or Canada. GRASS PAVERS LTD. (313) 549-4046 3807 Crooks Road Royal Oak, Michigan 48073 COUNCIL MEETING TO: Council rr FROM: Michael P. Gaf f ron, Assistant Zoning Admi ni st'rEiJro 1984 DATE: November 15, 1984 CITY OF ORONO SUBJECT: #880 Steven Ruce, 4625 West Branch Road - Conditional Use Permit Zoning District - RR-1B - 2 acre unsewered Application - Conditional Use Permit for a commercial greenhouse attached to existing dwelling. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Site Plan Exhibit E - Typical Construction Plan Exhibit F - Copy of Planning Commission Action Notice Exhibit G - Code Sections Pertinent (Commercial Use) The applicant wishes to construct a 10' x 25' greenhouse attached to the existing dwelling. The use would be somewhat commercial in that applicant plans to sell some plants to others at off -site locations. The planned structure and use would have no of fect on the septic system, would not appear to create additional traffic or cause any neighborhood hazards, and meets all setback requirements. Note that this is a the acre lot in a two acre zone. Planning Commission at their November 19, 1984, meeting found that no retail sales activity was proposed to take place on the property, and recommended approval subject to the structure conforming to all pertinent building code requirements. Planning Commission also questioned whether the proposed use is intense enough to even require a conditional use permit, and recommended that staff review the possibility of refunding the conditional use permit application fee. This was brought in as an application for a commercial greenhouse conditional use permit per Section10.20, Subd 3(E). It may instead fall under the "home occupation" standards [10.20 Subd 4(c)I as an accessory use. A resolution of approval for the conditional use permit is attached. CITY OF ORONO 31 GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATIONt' , /,� r YV ----------------------------------------- - - - - ---------------------- y PROPERTY LOCATION UrLL� Q Site Address I+Q(N V` "i ,� r�,ir�a�RNC14 R�(�, ��cjl�j;- Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) orlIt %� L'LLQI)I- Please check one -- Is the property ✓ abstract or torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included on requi red survey. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name & t Mailing Address TG�I V`jt•;i Phone - ( L - (Z'G t roc-iA R (,fkl? . M,',A rIr N _C�s, ,y -------------------------------------------------------------------------- OWNER Name `1 �.(L('.� .1 tMACE. Phone 4-7 C-7 L.t Mailing Address VIEL ,�'\OAO. NOM0, Date Property Acquired ) (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. -----------------------------------.-----------------7 \J\Lr�~'•�- ------ FEES - Conditional Use Permits -' 5100.00 a) Residential Accessory Use ` �i OCT 2 5 t984 $100.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etcVr y $100.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg d) Land Alteration (grading, filling) Commercial/Industrial Use PRD/PID '- see fee schedule r; Other Applications $200.00 Vacation r^ $250.00 Rezoning $100.00 Appeals zftz Other - see fee schedule (over) PRESENT USE OF PROM"PTY Present Zoning District ���L�� S- f ,_.� Present Use of Property ✓ Residential _ Other (specify) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe rE'C1UeSt in detail: _LFf�11rrT ([& ',�7�,11 �jj) ((, T9, (;fF.E'Jlt;ucP AT-T_& 1'ra -, Tt1 NII 7wi w%Ac.' rem I'NiWvx f Wc.= 3 u- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form. Certi f ied Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this l ist 12,! from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603Government Center 348-3271) L� Stamped, ] ega 1 sized envelopes (110) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Construction plans, if applicable. Flat Map. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE. The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to payallfeesand/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of,,his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature 1.� Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner- hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authc,izes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this Z�i Owner's signature 1_ (A Date ----------------------------- 0 -- --------------------------------------- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commissir-)n Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. •;s���+) �I �.!'4.rs[' :rv�.rSwi'E'�s�SEfiNs✓$*lsr ! i-- Zoo 47 sE v o 2 WESE v+ c ssa•o�•• [ L BRANCH NARY 1: 0 N K n 'Pert of moo& ►ww park Vacated - NOjk 42 � - C9J ICU Z RUh DATE 10/19/84 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT NO. PI435401 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PAGE 25 BATCH 010 38 06-117-23 32 0002 38 06-117-23 33 0006 38 06-117-23 33 000B PROP ADOR 00405 NORTH ARM DR 04680 WEST BRANCH RD 04640 WEST BRANCH RD OWNER NAME LAKEVIEW GOLF Of MTKA INC D F PETERSON ETAL J 8 G TRAUL TAXPAYER LAKEVIEW GOLF OF MTKA INC JOHN E BAKER JOHN E TRAUL NAME/ADOR 4520 W BRANCH RD 4680 W BRANCH RD 4640 W BRANCH RD MO*JND MN SS364 MOUND MN SS364 MOUND MH SS364 38 06-117-23 34 0001 38 06-117-23 34 0002 38 07-117-23 21 0014 PROP ADOR 04560 WEST BRANCH RD 04505 WEST BRANCH RD OWNER NAME DONNA E MAGER R L WENKSTERN RAY J i LORNA MILBAUER TAXPAYER DONNA E MAGER R L WENKSTERN RAY J MILBAUER NAME/AODR 4580 W BRANCH ROAD 54SO THREE POINTS BLVD 8924 NEWTON AVE SO MOLD MN 55364 MOUND MN SS364 BLOOMINGTON MN 55431 38 07-117-23 22 0001 38 07-117-23 22 0010 38 07-117-23 22 0011 PROP ADOR 04625 WEST BRANCH RD 04665 WEST BRANCH RD OWNER NAME E A GUILERSON ETAL RICHARD B HAWKINSON RICHARD B HAWKINSOIN TAXPAYER E A GUNDERSON SCOTT LUSE RICHARD B HAWKINSON NAME/I.00R 4665 W BRANNCH RD 4665 WEST BRANCH RD 1575 COPELAND RD HOLM MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 PROP ADOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH 010 00009 NAME/ADOR 0 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS Of THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT Of OPER�/TI TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. / OAT % A BY dwg. no. title: PERSPECTIVE VIEW OF SUN VALLEY CEBU 3=12 SHOWING PARTS ASSEMBLY . date: scale: NOT TO SCALE rev : dwn : BG . NOTE: MODEL ILLUSTRATED IS J.ANCO STANDARD 10'-11 3/8" FOUNDATION LENGTH WCOOT C A cu A r rc—,, v DOORWAY ZONING FILE NO. 880 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 11-20-84 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Steven J. Ruce COPIES TO: 4625 West Branch Road Mound, MN 55364 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: xx Conditional Use Permit --------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- Date of Meeting: 11-19-84 Vote: 6 For 0 Agaihst Planning Commission recommends the following: xx Approval: Subject to conditions noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. The structure must conform to all pertinent building code requirements. 2. No retail sales activity is allowed on the property. 3. Planning Commission recommends staff review the possibility of refunding the application fee based on the low level of commercial use intended. ------------- -------- ------------------------------------------------------ r.pplicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Council - December 10, 1984 Applicant's information. or next scheduled meeting Deadline for the for the is dependent upon receipt meeting is meeting. of additional In all cases, the application must be continued with the submittal of requested information within _or the City will consider the application as formally withdr-.wn. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. S 10.20 SEC. 10.20. R-lA ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Subd. 1. Purpose. The "R-IA" One Family Residential District is intended to provide a district which will allow a combination of low density residential development and limited agricultural activity. Planned residential developments may be allowed by conditional use permit. The district shall have immediate access to highways and public sanitary sewer. Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. Within any "R-lA" One Family Residential District, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: A. One family detached dwellings. B. Public owned parks and playgrounds. e:-- Rttnicipal buildings. Subd. 3. Cond . t Iona 1 Uses. thin any "R-lA" One Family Residen District, nf) structure or land shall be used for the following uses except bj conditional' use permit: A. Srnools. Public schools and parochial or private schools which teach a curriculum similar to a public school r:c.vided no thudding shall be located within fifty feet of any lot line of an abutting lot in an "R" District and that a fence be erected fifteen feet or more from all street lot lines where the abutting use is for open play, and nursery schools providing fifty square feet of playground space per pupil. B. Churches. Churches including those related structures located on the same site which are an integral part of the church proper, convents or homes for persons related to a religious function on the same site provided no building other than a residence shall be located within fifty feet of any lot line of an abutting lot in an "R" District. C. Clubs, Camp etc. Golf courses, country clubs, tennis clubs, public swimming pools serving more than one family, scout camps, YMCA camps, YWCA camps, church camps, or private non- profit parks, playgrounds and other similar uses. The principal structure for any of the above listed uses shall be 100 feet or more from any abutting lot in an "R" District, and accessory structures shall be a minimum of fifty feet from any lot line. D. Public Service Structures. Public service structures, including but not limited to electric transmission lines, buildings such as telephone exchange stations, booster or pressure regulating stations, wells, and plumbing stations, elevated tanks, lift stations and electrical cower substations, provided no building shall be located within f ty feet from any lot line of an abutting lot in an "R" District. Drior to granting such permit it shall be found that the architectural design of ORONO CC 279 (4-1-84) S 10.20 service structures is compatible to the neighborhood in which it is to be located and thus wig promote the general welfare. E. greenhouses, mmercial greenhouses provided all outsidrstor age isfenced in-s ch a manner so as to screen the stored mate -from view -when observed from the public street or adjoining lot. F. Recreation Areas. Private gun clubs, arch^ry ranges, riding stables, ski slides, provided the area is fenced and no part of the principal use is less than 100 feet from any lot :_ine. G. Guest Houses. A separate dwelling constructed c,n an existing undivided lot for the sole use of the occupants of the principal buildings, including their domestic employees or their non-paying guests. All regular lot requirements shall be met ty the guest house. H. Planned Residential Development. Limited to eetached single family dwellings only and subject to the limitations of Section 10.32. I. Duplex Credit. One duplex may be located on a single lot as a conditional use upon application therefor provided that public sanitary sewer service is available, and the lot is al3acent to a commercial or industrial district, and the duplex is constructed withi., 200 feet cf the commercial or industrial district. A duplex is defined as a two-family unit residential building. J. Apiaries. K. Animals. The keeping of domestic animals for non-commercial purposes including horses for the use of the o<cupants of the premises, provided that any accessory building used for housing such animals shall be located not less than 150 feet from the nearest lot line. A minimum of one acre in aggregate, exclusive of one acre for the principal building, must be available for each animal unit, except as hereinafter set forth. A minimum of two acres of open pasture must be available for a single horse and one additional acre must be available for each additional horse. When the horses are kept stabled and do not require pasture for feed purposes, the minimum pasture requirement inay be adjusted at the discretion of the Council. Such minimum pasture acreage shall not include low lying lands unusable for pasture or grazing. Any person keeping such animals must comply with the provisions of the City Code. mo -e acres. L. Farms (Crop). rrovided that the area is ten or Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 ORONU CC 280 (4-1-84) S 10.20 M. Antenna Structure. Oise independent antenna structure with antenna or combination of antenna attached thereto, subordinate to and servicing the principal use or structure on the same lot and customarily incidental thereto that is not attached to another structure provided the height of the antenna structure does not exceed 65 feet and the antenna structure is set back from any lot line a distance at least equal to the total height of the antenna structure. Source: Ordinance Effective Date: 6-5-, Subd. 4. Accessory Uses. Within any "R-IA" One Family Residential District, no accessory structure or use of land shall. be permitted except for one or more of the following uses: A. Garages. Private garages and parking space. B. Pools, etc. Private swimming pool, tennis courts, and paddocks. ,,,---------- .� -C. Home Occupations. -Any gainful occupation meeting all of the following requirements %when engaged in only by persons rest ng--itt._tfieir dwelling, when there is no employed assistant, when that occupation is conducted within the principal structure only, when evidence of the occupation is not visible from the street, no signs other than those permitted in "R" Districts are present, no excessive stock in trade is stored on the premises, over the counter retail sales are not involved, the entrance to the home occupation is gained from within the structure, and the use does not adversely affect the character of the uses permitted in the district in which it is located. A professional person may u'I his residence for consultation, emergency treatment or performance of religious rites but not for general practice of his profession when such general practice will involve the need for more than three off-street parking spaces for the occupant and visitors. D. Signs. Signs as regulated in the Zoning Chapter. E. Temporary Structures. Buildings temporarily located for purposes of constructing on the premises for a period not to exceed time necessary for such constructing. F. Gardens, etc. Gardening and other horticultural uses including aviaries and decorative landscape features. G. Roadside Stands. One roadside stand offering for s3le only farm products produced on the premises provided that such stand does not exceed 200 square feet in area and that it is located at least thirty feet back from the public right-of-way. source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 ORONO CC: 281 (4-1—F,a) § 10.7 Subd. 4. Accessory Uses. Within any "RR-1V One Family Rural Residential District, the following uses shall be a permitted accessory use: A. Any accessory use as regulated in the "R-IA" District and "Animals" as regulated in Section 10.20, Subdivision 3, Subparagraph M. Suhd. 5. Area, Height, Lot Width and Yard Requirements. A. Height. No structure or building shall exceed 2-1/2 Stories or thirty feet in height except as provided in Section 10.75. B. Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be observed: Side Yard Lot Lot Front Side Adjacent to Rear A cz: :;:;'.`, aru, Yard _ Street Yard 5 acres 300 feet 100 feet 50 feet 100 feet 100 feet SEC. . .28. RR-lB ONE FAMILY RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. S� ". 1. Purpose. The "RR-lB" One Family Rural Residt,#'ial D..:trict is intended to provide a district which will allow a combination of low density residential development and limited agricultural activity. Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. within any "PR-lB" One Family Rural Residential District, no land or structures shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: A. Any permitted use as regulated in the "P-IA" District. Subd. 3. Conditional Uses. Within any "RR-lB" One Family Rural Residential District, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit: A. Uses. Any conditional use as regulated in the <.:":R-11 District except for "Duplex Credit" and "Ar'nals". B. Farms (Stock). Provided that the area is ten or more acres. C. Hospitals, Etc. Hospitals for human care, sanitariums, rest homes, nursing homes, provided that all buildings are located 100 feet or more from the lot line of any abutting 'ot in an "R" District. The site shall contain not less than 600 square feet of lot area for each person to be accommodated. Source: 0L d, },,, : 85 Effective Ua4 . ORONO ''(-' 288 !4-1-R4) City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A VES01,13TION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IE.R MUNICIPAI, ZONING CODE SECTION 10.20, SUBD 3(E) - FILE NO. 880 WHEREAS, Steven Ruce (herein&ft.er "th(- applicant") is the owner of the property located at 4625 Vest Branch Pc,ad located within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and :(•pally described as follows: r The north 208 and 71/100 feet of the East 208 and 71/100 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 7, Township 117 North Range 23 West.. (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a Conditional Use Permit to permit the use of an attached 10' x 25' greenhouse for commercial purposes per Municipal Zox,d-ng Code Section 10.20, Subdivision 3(E). NOW, THEREFORE, B:i IT RESOLVED by the City Counci 1 of Orono, Minnesota: Findings 1. The application was reviewed as F.cning File No. 880. 2. The property is located in the RR-113 Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. 3. On November 19, 1984, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the application aspropesed and recommended approval ,finding .hat no retail sales activity is proposed to take place on the property, that no setback variances would be required, no additional traffic to or from the property would be created, and the proposal would have no effect on the septic system, subject to the condition that the structure conform to all pertinent sections of the Building Code. 4. The City Council has considered this applica&ion including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 1 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5. The City Counci If i nds that granting a Conditional Use Permit to allow the commercial use of the attached 10' x 25' greenhouse will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Conclusions, Order and Conditions Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Counci 1 hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit per. Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.20, Subd 3(E) to permit. the use of an attached 10' x 25' greenhouse for commercial purposes, subject to the following conditions: 1. No retail sales activity may take place on the property. 2. All outside storage of materials or equipment must be fenced in such a manner so as to screen the stored material from view when observed from the public street or adjoining lot. 3. As a home occupation, the following performance standards further apply: a) Entrance: to the greenhouse must be gained from within the house. b) No sign permitted other than those normally allowed in residential districts. c) No employees allowed to wort; on the site. 4. The structure must conform tc all pertinent Building Code requirements. Page 2 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NG. 5. ViDlation of or non-compliance with any of the terms nd ::anditions of this resolution shall constitute a violatic— Df the Zoning Code, shall automati-ally terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishat-le as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned owner has rear', understood and hereby agrees tc the terms of this resolutior and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns .�rebyagrees tothe recording of this resolution in the ch�iin of title of the property. Adopted by the Oi�no City Council on this loth day of December, 1984. ATTEST: Dorothy �'.. Hallin, City Clerk Property owner(s) Property Owner(s) Property owners Mary C. R: t ler, 'layor Spouse Spouse pouse Page 3 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. STATP OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this __ day of _ , 19PS, before me a Notary Public within and or said Count y, personally appeared _ known to me to Fee —tie person(sj described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC _____ --- MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HEN14EPIN ) On this day of , 1984, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, pei-sonally appeared known to me to �e the person(s) described n and who executes' the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSI01q EXPIRES' - P.1(tr 4 r)f d /Vo CITY OF ORONO INSPECTION NOTICE PERMIT NO. 77E,- CALLEDIN SCHEDULED COMPLETED -*L- R & ( E� DATE TIR1LCOUNCIL METING ADDRESS _J! L��,l�ft,� f �•..�.: .r•^rt� ----- OWNER h � CONTR. IVAN'10_7__C --_-- ---- — TELEPHONE NO. — p FOOTING L) PLUMBING RI O SITE INSPECTION O FRAMING p MECHANICAL ❑ INSULATION p WATER HOOKUP OEXCAV.IGRADING/FILLING LAKESHOREIWETLANDS ❑ WALL BD p METER SET/TURN ON ❑ LICENSING ❑ FINAL O SEWER HOOKUP O COMPLAINT ❑ PROGRESS O SEPTIC INSTALL O FOLLOW UP O DEMOL ❑ SEPTIC MAINT ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ FIRE PREV ❑ WELL TEST PUMP ❑ FIREPLACE/WOOD BURNER D _ COMMENTS: 2 j1` L,JIMIAJt-'L,/N� ❑ WORK SATISFACTORY PROCEED ❑ PHOTO TAKEN ❑ CORRECT WORK 6 PROCEED ❑ CORRECT WORK CALL FOR REINSPECT ION IIEFORE COVERING _O_CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. INSPECTOR WILL RETURN TOP ORDER POSTED CALL INSPECTOR p I SPECTIONREQUIRED CALL TO ARRANGE ACCEaS call for the next inspection 24 hou-s in advance Owner/Cunt►. in site 473-73S7 Inspector - --- -- -- Whoo Co,- ' •weciu,*% Fde C,x)y'Soe Nuuce OCC 10 1984 OF ORONO 1 To: Orono Council Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator Date: December 5, 1984 Subject: #881, Krutzig Custom Homes, Inc., 1629 Bohns Point Road Variance Zoning District - LR-lB - 1 acre sewered Application - Hardcover variance List of Exhibits: Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F - Planning Commission Minutes of 11/19/84 Applicant is constructing a new residence on this 0.86 acre sewered lot. The original building permit application included decks on the lake side, additional hardcover in the courtyard, and a standard driveway with apron. At the request of the applicant, the decks and courtyard improvements were excluded and the driveway was proposed to be constructed of a porous pavement in order to meet hardcover requirements if variances were denied. The proposed house and location met all code requirements and permit was ubsequently issued based on the above proposal, with a hardcover variance application immediately filed. Please review the survey and the h-rdcover calculations. Applicant's rationale for requesting the variance is that a large portion of the lot is in the 250' - 500' zone and wi 1 1 have r hardcover where 30% is allowed, hence the total requested hardcover- behind the 75' setback line wi. l 1 be less than the maximum a l l owed. This is essentia 1 1 y a tradeof f between hardcc ver in the 75' - 250' and 250' - 500' zones. Note that this type of a tradeoff has not been granted in the past for new constrvc*ion; only in cases where there was an existing hardcover problem. Note that the house and proposed decks are located more than 75' fron, the shoreline and behind the 931.5' elevation line, below which no filling or grading is allowed. The entire propert} would be allowed 7,257 s.f. of hardcover at maximum development. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended denial of this variance request, based on the following reasons: 1. At the time of application, the applicant was informed by staff fully of the hardcover limitations within the 75'-250' zone. 2. This is a substandard lot in area and slightly substandard on lot width. 3. It is a low lot that provides . vdreulic capacity for the drainage of adjoining properties and the building department should address that. issue. 4. An adequate house for this lot could have been constructed, meeting the 4595 sq. feet of allowed hardcover in the 75 - 250' zone. 5. That the additional hardcover is not necessary, to maintain a substantial property right. 6. This problem of hardcover was brought on by the applicant. A number of issueswere brought up by the neighboring property owners at the Planning Commission meeting, including drainage and the existence of private sewer services near the new house on the subject property, apparently without legal easements. Please refer to the Planning Commission minutes for a discussion of the sewer issue. The drainage problem relates directly to the addi t i cna l hardcover proposed, and brings up a number of questions. The applicant has not submitted a grading and drainage plan, but has verbally indicated there will be 2-3' of fill brought up to the foundation of the house and tapered away from it, and that a culvert will be installed under the driveway. Mr. Lohmar, directly to the south, has indicated his concerti that additional drainage not 5e forced onto his property as a r-.�sult of this new house. Mrs. Lohmar states that the vacant lot stayed wet much o the time, though staff notes this is not a designated wetland and there is no vegetative indication that it is always under water. Applicant has stated he will do whatever grading work is necessary to take care of the drainage and keep it on his property. The applicant has !uggested that he install an underground storage and disposal system for the roof run-off, since the soils at the sight appear to be quite sandy. He requests that Council consider this type of a system as a possible tradeoff for allowing all or a portion of the requested added hardcover to be constructed. Staff is not aware of any case where this type of tradeoff has been granted for new construction on a vacant lot. The Council may deny the application based on the findings made by the Planning Commission. You have the option of granting all or part of the request based on the additional vacant lot area past the 250' setback line. If you wish to coi.sider a tradeoff based on the underground storage system, the applicant should submit plans for review by the City Engineer. Staff will draft a resolution for your January meeting reflecting your motion. /d 3 ( -S ife&4, 47�t& 160 • C06 CITY OF ORONO ;# l G 3 �� .5, ,, ` ya • vU CL�,, VARIANCE APPLICATION Application Fee OO.,OOv After -the -Fact Fee $200.00 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION r Site Address ri•` "�'. Property Identifir_ation Number (P.I.D.) _ Please check one -- Is the property abstract or torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. --------------------/------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT �t�l\�G►M t1P�--�-ti,� N a m e �QuZ'Lt % (jxbTti r% �M" s -set. Phone V -t7s 3'1 Mailing Address 410 �UNdwLti �o 91,tw%aA � M-) 5N44-7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OWNER Name uArnt- Phone Mailing Address Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do riot) also own the adjacenr parcels of land. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District GICCA,n--t" Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 300.04G Describe request in detail: *rSJ�V•-z- y��►c„�c��- ____ _ VARIANCES REQUIRED . I ; (1 i � 41-1 ` _ - 1. j Lot Area _ Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variant-#,f ! Front Side Rear) Cther HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or pi -act ica1 enforcement of zoning regulations: S�Z.E, oG `oT difficulty resulting from strict ------------------------.-------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: Naveow 6L,*- lo2t jo{. 14MOMM0. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certif ied Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this 1 ist f rom Hennepin County Dep-r.tment of Finance A-603 Govr-rnment Center 348-3271 Stamped, legal sized envelopes (N10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Plat Map. ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------- The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to payallfeesand/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies tha the information supplied is true and correct to the best o h' Ar know A. y�y Applicant's signature `�L Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, conunission membe is.and Councilm mbers for purposes of investigation and verifica+ion of t est. Owner's signature h Z., Date ---------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- Applicant must have all. submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. f r �,- � •� t 41 �� P U3� C31 NOERENBERG r R c0 • 04yG r WINNE NA TDeA �� •:. ,�. , �c cc �.`� TMAXWELL BAYJ ,.. �• ,1, won och 17, 6. low(41 ;, � � Ewa CIl �. _ . _ _ , • ►- .;�. i.' s:- NO. Ills r " • � �:.,� y, � � ' �..� _, ram./� ,,; J 11' L A K E ell t N j1 ., 1 • r Y AS HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATIJN SYSTEM REPORT NO. P1435401 PP'wPERTY OWNERS LIST PAGE 11 38 08-117-23 44 0012 38 17-117-23 11 0002 OIS95 BOHNS POINT RD 01655 BOHNS POINT RD GERARD BLOHORN J DAYTON A E DAYTON GERARD BLOHORN J M DAYTON i E J DAYTON 1595 BOHN'S POINT RD 1655 BOHNS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 11 0003 36 17-117-23 11 0004 38 17-117-23 :1 0005 PPOP ADCR 0W1ER NAME 0162S BOHNS POI'1T 90 D T TROWBRIDGE ETAL 0 i S ANrLRSON ET AL KRUTZIG CUSTOM HOMES INC TAXPArER 0 T TROWBRIDGE TOM E SWEEN KRUTZIG CUSTOM HONES INC NAME/AD,0 1625 BOHNS POINT RD 1600 BOHNS POINT RD 410 FERNDALE RD N WAYZATA NN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA tN 55391 38 17-117-23 11 0006 3a 17-117-23 11 0007 38 17-117-23 11 0008 PROP AOUR 0163S BOHNS POINT RD 01645 BOHNS POINT RO 3644ER 14AME DOUGLAS W LOIIMAR A WIFE D A M rOX J M DAYTON A E J DAYTON TAXPAYER DODULAS W LOHMAR DAVID K A MARLENE FOX JUDSON M DAYTON NAf%,'ADDR 1635 BOHNS PT RD 1645 BOHNS P0II4T RD 1655 SOHH'S POINT ROAD ORONO MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 ORONO MN 55323 38 17-117-23 11 0009 38 17-117-23 11 0010 38 17-117-23 11 0012 PQQlP AODR J.44FO NAME J M DAYTON A E J DAYTON J M DAYTUN i E J DAYTON J M DAYTON A E J DAYTON TAXPAYER JUDSON M DAYTON JUDSON M DAYTON JUDSON M DAYTON NAME/ADOR 1655 BUH1+'S POINT ROAC 16S5 1AGiN'S POINT ROAD 1655 BOHN'S POINT ROAD ORONO 'N 55323 )RoNo MN 55323 ORONO MN 55323 38 17-117-23 11 0011 38 11-117-23 1: 0013 �QOP AUDR ')WNER NAME J M DAYTON i E J DAYTON J M Dayton & E J Dayton ,AXPAVER JUCSCN M DAYTON TOTAL BATCH 004 00013 Judson M Dayton 04AME/AOOR 1655 OOHN'S POINT ROAD ORONO MN 55323 1655 Bohn' s Pc i nt Rd Orono, MN. 55323 z4 A-E J�f e.4.&'E' T/4/,'CA !��✓ a WY.7P M •/ l-al-Il Certificate of Survey for Wiiliam M. Krutzig of Trar_t. A, Registered Land Survey No. 565 Hennepin County, Minnesota t rf V i I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representat of a survey or the boundaries of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 565, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and of the location of a proposed building_ It does not purport to ;show other improvements or encroachments. Date : 5-27-83, house shown 10-12-84 Scale: 1" _ 50' fp.s Spot elevation a Iron marker 00RDON p TOFF N CI,, INC. 0; 0 / Mark S. GronDerg Rego. No. 12755 Gordon R. Coffin Reg. No. 6064 Engineers & Surveyors Long Lake, Minnesota NA,ctAc,ove,k c At.0 V L.JI►-T I O.Aj S A . ETA t- lr►, AREA = * ACC x g . L-or -7S - 2-So r = /9, 3-7 s s k �.: : y P5"l s.t. j,? • Lal- AR t-A 2 nD • SOO = 81 a7!; f ranuSC AN O aw-A C-f= = G• ,. "�'. ' , f • :. f`f /• • , i yr. 1•iC .�. I. y .... v .JI`I r•'�• t �.. '� �1.%�•n 1 j • � ..- r' I ' - ., I I . �w �E i' .. � O� �. I ' { i' _ •• 'w rr r w v ,_ ., C j'•'r 1.1 t� .. ! c, - �r )::, _ ',fir ti ,C• _ ,f .. r r•, - I.�,���,.�r,c. r:r'*1'•-*- .. �M.a '� PAr.. �.!•`, ram.• ��;!'t1.1 � " I ,. (.-� j.,:r..�`t ` ! r... ,� .� .. .. �.,t', ;�►►:-[►..: �i. G � 'I�x►!• L (�.Lt r.�•: �'t.. 41A�i'+f"f�'LE 1fC. 7.� ' 7'_►7 � s � _ L� � oi� • . � ' ' `� •-725 �iR"tdbRl L T^^"f % r' :. f l t C 1l �: l.. ^f"r' ' • " `! ,� Y i �:A (� ' 7 �. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 19, 1984 PAGE 15 #881 KrUq'ZLG CUSTOM HOMES, INC., 1629 BOHNS POINT ROAD VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 9:43 - 10:30 PM Bill Krutzig was present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaf.fron noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. The following neighbors were present for the public hearing: Douglas and Ceil I•ohmar of 1635 Bohn's Point Road 11r. Lohmar stated he was concerned with the rage along his lot line and that Krutzig's lot low lot and has accepted drainage from the Lohmar noted that Krutziq will be f i l ? inc �Lit.e a large area which will affect the other • perties, and I would like to see a study dont- to see if the very nerrow strip remaining will ta::e care of the drainage. If the drainage can be taken care of, he would have no concern. lie stated that he had specifically sloped his e• sting Iri veway to take care of the drainage proble, Mrs. Lohmar observed tt,at within the last 10 years she hasn't been able t- walk across Krutzio's lot because of the wz ter Gaffron stated that this lot is not a designate( wetlands. Krutziq stated that there will not a bas�?ment :,, the ho He had consulted with the neighbors and had cc to t,ie cone: ,:ion that a two story home would 1w aisproporti nei to the other homes in the area. ^>affr n stated that the original applicati.n came .Ln r,..c.:esting the house as sown, the decks, and the ,.rivewdy of indpt.;.t.TAinat- proportions and sorr.o hardcover i the eourtyaro area. The oropoFed house w: t _ t._a dens and additional hardcover and wit► fare minimum driveway meets the 25% hardcover. Another considera.icn is the lot cehind the 250' point zone is quite substancia l %a yid we have ., a number of other applications ^ons:dered giving the applicant credi° for tha '.-ea in c.i lcu lat . :.pry *.-,e, dcover. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBF14 19, 1984 PAGE 16 1881 RRUTZIG HOMES Goetten stated that one way we protect drainage is to limit hardcover, and that the 250'-500' credit has only been used for existing situations, not for new lots for new construction. Rovegno stated that the property must accept the drainage that it has formally taken and not discharge at a faster rate or direct it other than the direction it has gone. Tnat is a building matter. Lohmar questioned Krutzig about the fact that this is a "spec" house. What are they going to do? What kind of guarantee will be provided? Krutzig noted that the certificate of occupancy given by the City will be the guarantee because before it is issued everything is inspected by the building department. Gaffron noted that the grading will have to be done in a way that the water will f low onto the property in the past way. Also, you may be creating more of a problem by putting a house on this lot than was there before even if you stay behind the 930' elevation line. Kelley stated he would have a ha -d time approving a v a r i a for hardcover f:ince there is such a problem .with water right now. Krutzig said he wasn't aware of a hardcover problem until after the permit application was made. Mabusth had talked to the applicant prior to going to Council and suggested building a 2 story house or building rather than out and reducing some of the hardcover because Council does not look favorably upon hardcover, variances. Gaffron noted that Krutzig was told before the permit was issued that we can't approve it with the decks and the extensive driveway. That was his risk to construct pilings before the additional requests were approved. McDonald questioned Krutzig about ever building a house in Orono before. He has but stated he was unaware of the hardcover stipulations until now. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMAER 19, 1984 PAGE 17 #881 KRUTZIG HOMES Lihmar brought up another point about the lot. Their sewer line is directly under the rear of Krutzig's house, however, the house is on pilings so that is not a problem. I.ohmar stated that he would like Krutziq to assured him that an easement showing exactly where the pipe is and a right to access his property will be drawn up. Gaffron stated our sewer responsiblity ends at the City's sewer manhole in the street. This is a private easement serving these houses. we don't have any code standards that require sewer pipes to be a certain distance f om the house and this is a case that we wouldn't allow today. But at this time we have no responsibl.ity. Krutzig explained that Gordon Coffin had gone out and described this easement and we intend to describe it b) Metes & Bounds on an easement and put it on to a drawing. A formal written document protecting the neighbors will have to drawn up by Krutzig's attorney. Gaffron stated that another issue is where will Krutzig's house hook up to sewer? There is some question as to whether the ex.istinq shared line can handle another hookup. But this is considered a building issue. One option they have is to ;Hove the sewer lines but this is between the private parties. Rovegno moved, Kelley seconded, to recommend denial of application #681, Krutzig Homes, 1629 Bohn's Point Road, based on to the following findings: 1. At the time of application, the applicant was informed by staff fully of the hardcover limitations within the 75 - 250' zone. 2. This is a substandard lot in area and slightly substanuard on lot width. 3. It is a low lot that provides hydraulic capacity for the drainage of adjoining properties and the building department should address that .issue. 4. An a `equate house for this lot could have been constructed, meet inq the 459'-. sq. feet of allowed hardcover. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 19, 1984 PAGE 18 #881 KRUTZIG HOMES 5. That the additional hardcover is not necessary, to maintain a substantial property right. 6. This problem of hardcover was brought on by the applicant. Krutzig clarified that he was not aware of hardcover, he had his plans done according to the setbacks, structural engineer had worked on the plans, and all those plans had to be submitted at one time. At the time they were submitted was the time that Gaffron called and said we have a hardcover problem. Krutzig stated that he had at that time already spent $7500. He stated he had the option to drop his plans or continue on the basis that he apply for hardcover variance. Krutzig also asked if a pool is considered hardcover. Rovegno clarified that a pool is not considered hardcover, the deck is but the pool has its own closed recirculating movment. It doesn't drain, it collects. Motion, Aye (6), Nay (0). FENCE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Mab•)sth clarified that she would like the input sheets back to her by December 10, 1984. Rovegno questioned how long grading has to sit there before it becomes existing grade? I fcel if we have a reference point that you know will be consistant and then setting a height from that point. Rovegno feels that the fence issue should be addressed as a total case including cornmF-rcial and residential. Mabusth noted that Council asked that only the residential fence ordinance be looked at. Thpy also asked that controls be considered for privacy fences that are constructed as accessory structures. Another issue is protecting the view of neighbors. All of the sample codes submitted for this review deal with protection of adjoining property not protection for the person on the other s4 IN of a major thoroughfare. l COUNCIL MEETING TO: Council DEC 10 1984 FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE: December 6, 1984 CITY OF ORONO SUBJECT: #854 Robert Johnson, 1981 Fagerness Point Road - Varianc_� and Conditional Use Permit. - After--the-fact - Resolution Application - Conditional Use Permit and Variance to allow construction of retaining walls and increase hardcover with -in the lakeshore setback areas. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - List of Property Owners Exhibit D - Survey Showing Hardcover Exhibit E - Letter from Applicant's Engineer (Re: Stability of Stairway Structure) Exhibit F - Retaining Wall Plan Exhibit G - Hardcover Calculation Diagrams Exhibit H - Memo's of August 10, 1984, October 1`, 1984 Exhibit I - Previous Rip -Rap Permits Exhibit J - Planning Commission Minutes (8-20-84, 10-22-84) Exhibit K - Record of Tree Stumps Located 11-18-84 Exhibit 1, - Letter to Previous Owner Exhibit M - Letter from Previous Owner Exhibit N - Letter from Applicant's Engineer (Re: Plastic Perforation Spacing) Exhibit O - Note from Applicant (Re: Plantings) Exhibit P - Letter from D 6 D Tree Service (Re: Activity) This is an application (after -the -fact ) which is a result of an inquiry by a Planning Commission member regarding tree cutting on Fagerness Point. Subsequent staff investigations revealed that major work had been done on the property without permits: 1. Retaining walls/planters/steps were constructed on the west shorel..ne bank, which construction constitutes approxi- mately 250 sf of hardcover or about 3 percent in the 0-75' zone. These planter boxes also now have plastic underlying the rock beds which constitutes an additional approximately 250 sf for a total of about 6 percent. Additional gra.—led areas underlain by plastic increase the hardcover to 19 percent in this 0-75' setback zone. #854 Robert JohnS,on Page 2 2. The entire west hillside was apparently cleared of trees and brush. Early investigation revealed 2-24"+ stumps which appeared to be rotting and if recently cut, must have been dead trees. No stumps greater than 1/2-2" diameter were apparent on the slope, but the slopes and thick brush prevented a good reconnaissance of the hillside. It was not known whether any larger trees were cut and stumps removed at the crest of the hill. The owner stated that only small brush was removed from the slopes in order to "see what was there". There was no evidence of major- erosion of the slope occurring, but wave action is undercutting the bank. Planning Commission Member Adams stated that he found at least three stumps greater than 6" diameter and that he considered them to have been live trees based on new shoots now emerging from the stumps. Staff again inspected the hillside on November 8, 1984, and with the vegetation mostly died off, a number of stumps were apparent ( see Exhibit K) . At least 10 stumps were 6" in diameter or greater and had numerous new shoots sprouting up. 3. Retaining walls, planters, and steps had been constructed along the south side of the house and extended into the presumed road right-of-way. The Building Official noted to the contractor (Timberwall, Inc) that permits were required and that the steps must. be removed from the right-of-way. (This occurred prior to filing of the survey showing the house in the right-of-aay). No permit has yet been issued for this work, and the survey submitted by the applicant indicates that the steps and planters actually now extend up to 10' into the right-of-way. (Note that the garage extension to the house was granted a variance in 1974 based on the house being 8' back from the property line. No survey was required at that t ime. ) The walls, planters, graveled areas, and steps are all either concrete, timber, or gravel over plastic and constitute hardcover in the 75-250' zone in the amount of approximately 2,800 sf in addition to the existing house, deck, concrete patio, and driveway apron (excluding 20' road) which arc - approximately 5,300 sf for a total in the 75-250' zone of 8,125 sf or about 54%. Planters located on the east end of the property near the shoreline have been in place for some period of time and are underlain by plastic also. Along with the existing recently re -paved parking areas, there is about 27 percent hardcover in the East 0-75' zone (excluding the road ) . This hardcover apparently existed prior to 1984. See Exhibit G-2. Applicant has stated that he thought all required permits had been taken care of by his contractors. A permit was taken out by Niccum in 1983 for riprapping on the west side of the property. No other permits have been issued. Timberwall, Inc., the contractor who did the steps and retaining walls, stated that they did not know permits were required. #1854 Robert Johnson Page 3 Applicant has also stated that his landscapers did not cut more than two 6" or larger trees (which were dead) and the smaller brush was removed in order to determine the feasibility of relandscaping and protecting the hillside. Applicant notes he has planted 12 trees and over 300 shrubs since owning the property. Applicants tree service notes they removed only one tree, which was a diseased elm, and noted two other large elms had been removed by previous owners. (See Exhibits O and P). In a phone call to the forestry extension service at the University of Minnesota, I discussed with a forester what was indicated by the stumps with new sprouts or shoots. He stated that. with the 8-10" hardwoods described (oak, elm, ash, maple, etc), a sprouting stump was not clear evidence that the tree had been alive when cut, and that while the tree may have been dead for all intents, due to oak wilt or dutch elm, for instance, it might still sprout after being cut down. Staff contacted the former owner, now living in Florida, to establish what trees were existing when they moved out. ( See Exhibits Land M) . These Exhibits appear to establish that: A) The majority of the stumps are left from trees cut by the previous owner due to dutch elm disease. B) There was a concrete stairway previously on the west bank. C) There was an existing dock at one time. It appears that from all the evidence we have obtained to date, there does not seem to be a clear violation of the lakeshore tree -cutting regulations. The applicant has stated he intends to plant additional vegetation and has already commenced. Since a dock and stairway previously existed, it would also )ear that applicant certainly has a right to create a safe lake acucss on the west lakeshore of his property. The letter from Hickock and Associates (Exhibit E) indicates that the walls and steps are stable and not likely to fall into the lake. Our City Engineer indicates that the walls as part of the stair structure add some stability to the structure. He also indicates that the added hardcover is probably negated by the added retention provided by the planters, hence there is a rationale for allowing the structure to remain. The second letter from Hickock (Exhibit N)discusses the polyethylene sheeting which underlies virtually all the planters and rock beds on this site. They suggest. that 10 to 15 1/4" holes per square foot would be sufficient to eliminate any runoff or ponding. Perforation of the plastic sheeting would appear to be an acceptable alternative to its removal as recommended by the Planning Commission. #854 Robert Johnsen Page 4 Staff Recommends the following: 1. Applicant toper forate (with a pitchfork or other method) al l plastic covered areas on the property at the density of 10-15 1/4" holes per square foot, to be verified by staff. 2. Grant conditional use permit for the west bank steps and walls. Resulting west 0-75' hardcover is about 250 sf or 3 percent. 3. Applicant to obtain construction permit (after-the-fact)for all retaining wall structures. 4. Allow hardcover variances as follows based on new and existing plastic beds being perforated: WEST 0-75'....Allow 3% w:sere 2% was existing and 0% normally dllowed. CENTRAL 75-250' .... Allow 37% where 35% was existing and 25€ normally allowed EAST 0-75' ....Allow 14% where 27%was existing and 0% normally allowed. 5. The Public Works Coordinator has reviewed the steps and walls in the right-of-way, and recommends they be rebuilt and cut- back to extend no farther into the right-of-way than the planter/retaining walls along the house (about 3' out). A resolution is attached with conditions of approval of the conditional use permit and variances. r.r ..x ,yl✓ IT y CITY OF ORONO �"`•' GENERAL I.ANDUSEAPPLICATION -- - --------------------- . _ ------ PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address /siyi 1-14 Property Identification Number Please check one -- Is the property abstract or torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included on requi:.ed survey. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name Phone ,.� �i �•,� >;� ' � :;�_�, � e Mailing Address Name _ S; '• 114, , Phone Mailing Address Date Property Acquired ��'/ (month/year) I (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >rEBS - Co Edjtional Use Permits aD a) Residential Accessory Use $100.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc) $100.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg d) Land Alteration (grading, filling) $150.00 e) Commercial/Indust.rial Use PRD/PID - see fee schedule Other Applications $200.00 Vacation $250.00 Rezoning $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (over) PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. , PFZ / ca-Ni' I S f� lu �,A) e7e-- 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603Gove-nment Center 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (i10) pre -addressed t.o each of the names on the Bove list with no return address. C14. rtificate of survey. �/ ' 5. Construction plans, if applicable. / y 6. Plat Mao. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of h s/her kp,-wledge. Applicant's signature �2�Date Z_?)Zyr OWNERS SIGNATURE 4111 The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. C� / Owner's signature ( C Date �Z22 Applicant must he-ve all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. f+ A 0 S d d 1• hod ! io,� 4,0 - la xN+RIT 2 •• log ,• ` •�� � (.1 10 .r �t3� i`�h4+s.• ' c RFC `R+ Ul JAKE so At 2 71984 T� .. _..._ RUN DATE 07,Zte'64 BATCH 002 38 16-117-23 14 0002 PROP k.DOR 01989 FAGERNESS POINT RD 0641ER NAME DAVID A NITZ ETAL TAXPAYER ALLAN A SHIRLEY REZABEK NAMF:'.ACDR i"9 FAGERNESS PT RD WAYZATA tit SS391 38 18-117-23 14 0005 Wk�;P AC7R 01981 FAGERNESi POINT RD Ow+fR NAME FRLIt#G T FALK ETAL 'AAWAiER G ROBERT JOHNSON NAttE/ADOR 1,61 FAGERNESS POINT RD OR0N0 MN 55391 38 18-117-23 14 0008 PROP ADOR 01973 FAGERNESS POINT RO OWNER NAME A R BACKSTROM ETAL TAXPAYER A R BACKSTROM NAME/ADOR 1973 FAGERNESS PT RD WAYZATA MN SS391 38 18-117-23 41 0001 PROP ADDR 01991 FAGERNESS POINT RD ONNFR NAME ALLAN L PENNINGTON ETAL 'AxPAYER ORVILLE A ALEXANDRA FISHER NAMt/ADOF 1991 FAGERNESS POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 Ja t, HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY ONtERS LIST 38 18-117-23 14 0003 01987 FAGERNESS POINF RD RICHARD A _WANSON ET AL RICHARD A SWANSON 1987 FAGERNESS PT RD WAYZATA to 55391 38 18-117-23 14 0006 01975 FAGERNESS POINT RD JOHN K PURDY ETAL J04N K PURDY 1v75 FAGERNESS PT RD ORONO MN 55391 38 18-117-23 14 0009 01965 FAGERNESS POINT RD G L EKLOF A C F LEE GARY EKLOF / CATHY LEE 1965 FAGERNESS PT RD WAYZATA MN SS391 TOTAL BATCH 002 00010 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 4 38 18-117-23 14 0004 01985 FA6ERNESS POINT RD A I OPHEIM A M V OPHEIM ALAN I OPHEIM 1985 FAGERNESS POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 18-117-23 14 0007 01971 FAGERNESS POINT RD T A F MORTENSON THOMAS MORTENSON 1971 FAGERNESS PT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 18-117-23 14 0010 01955 FAGERNESS POINT RD AKE E ROtMVIST AKE E ROt?AKVIST 4484 W ARM RD SPRING PARK MN 55384 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF Tt'E HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTME T OF FRO RTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE BY +f - (.rrtitiutr,t rurr°Y for G. Witwt I •n.hnsan > + to in 4. Il.4f'RhlS� Mennepin County. MinnesiIa �XN• � .�v .... _ _ \ 01 .N!. ••; p Y • • J • .. /r�..1 I,' •'•.. I.r/ • /f I•C •r •. p Y/•r , ~•iIw/ e' .. I Me ., .• w." . .• et s.L+r. . rr• '! " ('..r.. /.wo , . J t horeby Lot, lh,,. is i true smi tArrlrtl ropes- 0014tInn ni ♦ %nrrvr Of It. h,+,Irt:larle: I ,r 4. i*AGLINIyS. 1Aj* a r •-rr •ntl nl th• Iu,n yr ♦if 4uitditoy f, t' anr, tlie eel n. It AARY virvlt/w.tt •tan show,, the 1gtitlin itl I.intsrapintg a4l"rtoiis nn sii,I ,u[. It d',n•• n7[ pu'l/urt In ahow )rnar iwpr)w-f% r'f% or encro•cli- ^unrs. L.• I � I' JiFf 'M/ /.. � �r GO1111r1h R. C,410 i% 1,W.. !Ni . • 0'-r -.."ATM fl 0 m-WpwwK Inch r 70 loot ILA Wit S. :,IA4 Alron �••/@r r,nrdun •1. ,n tley! Ihr. 6oAo d 6rarollnn an to, Mary •,• w/rnnl•eru IMrI, M0. tt'�'s InetnBlrrS and 11nl fur r�/o•f I :ny 1dk1•. Mitone Q 1 4 A 545 :r,dian Mound Wayzata. Minnesota 55391 September 24, 1984 (612) 473-4224 Mr. G. Robert Johnson 1981 Fagerness Point Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Re: Treated Timber landscaping Improvements at 1981 Fagerness Point Road Dear Mr. Johnson: As requested, we have reviewed your site plan and have inspected the treated timber improvements recently constructed on your property. The purpose of our investigations was to assess the structural stability of your improvements, as they have been constructed. We have made the following obser,ations: 1. Your site plan indicates cross ties were laid horizontally across the slope with anchors extending into the slope. The anchors appear to be placed on and into undisturbed soil which should prevent movement of the timber material. 2. All timbers appear to be interlocked and sufficiently secured with nails. 3. Your shoreline below the steps and planter boxes has been protected with rip rap to ?revent undermining of the timbers from high water or wave action. Based upon the information available, the strucural integrity of the improvements appears to be adequate. As a suggestion, you should revegetate the slopes adjacent to either side of the improvements as soon as possible to prevent any future erosion problems. Should you have any questions, please call me at 473-4224. Very t,-uly yours, EUGENE A. HICK OK AND SOCIATES Mic ael A. Panzer, P.E bt U Ry LAW ' (� �,./c ���,, wo 0 6r •r.r+aE� ,..� o 0 oce - �TEI' �sD Fcr? Sz'CIO c -Mir i I� " • r"eL -.-• r fL i v AW"LAIA-W 16 • 14 _ s M�# •'�# - ffA,LDcovc-2 d-7S wiaT C ruwe .- S"3o + yoo 24. co t.F. OAe 4 SrII,rS i �rnee�,tis A 2 SO s riAa,rc f,?P wqo 430'x5 5r E P1 IT r -75 L • '�, '1� rss a� se • � c o 0 � S c_ 8i D G7 t c r 7Sb it. .. i F z H v Qp s 4.� o ;'• Tr.�BcaS�4rLPS2 a«n �� °'„ °, :�- ' • - G a/Ver.- ovs,c pusnc- - -- - s Po 'off h , �� hr� '� i.�. •' ,�. � ro � � ,� 9 �A .. ' .. III' ,\ -U vim. '`f, p ` •�. a" 2 Say 4^0Mce.e0t 9 vo 2, OO �/ rr Ar'��r• — 4, - TpTNOu� tour • V s � icy •< _• b ► z S j tta3G 2 NA, ToTA4- M+A atb cov vfc /NLLkpiN40 _. ftm,T1C•MNbrAN'A1N ��XGLIAG�F.�4 �U� 3sfl 3of> 5XIH917- G -2 p -'7S EA sr PlAsr/e w/Rc>eNc gvrpS ova l'r l s '3pO S , 3w70 s 1, LL�►+t-puvr� / lam+ �t ♦ Z 7 �/ ♦_ I r4 t t_ -rt( / s �' S �p,ppti,p ter.,-� v O E cy r •, 'iv G O R. DVAJ t rie foe Yv 148y. TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE: August 10, 1984 SUBJECT: #854 G. Robert Johnson, 1981 Eagerness Point Road - Conditional use Permit - After -the -fact Application - Conditional Use Permit to construct retaining walls within 75' of the lakeshore List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - List of Property Owners Exhibit D - Survey Submitted h:,chibit E - Plans Submitted This is an after -the -fact application to place retaining walls ("planters" according to the applicant) ind steps within 75' of the lakeshore. The walls and steps are in pl..jce now and were constructed without City review or permits. A short synopsis of this project follows: The City issued a permit for 101.4 feet of rip -rapping to Bill Niccum of Minnetonka Portable Dredging Company for this address on September 22, 1983. The application noted only 30' would be rip rapped at this time, no time frame stated for completion of the rest. Early this summer staff was notified by a Planning Commission member of the apparent violations of tree cutting within 75' of the lake and construction of retaining walls. Staff's subsequent investigation revealed 2-24"+ stumps which appeared to be rotting and if recently cut, must have been dead trees. No stumps greater than 1/2-2" diameter wert• apparent on the slope. It is not known whether any larger trees were cut and stumps removed at the crest of the hill. The owner states that only small brush was removed from the slopes in order to "see what was there". As of today there appears to be roughly 50 percent cover again established over the slope. There is no evidence of erosion of the slope occurring. Retaining walls ("planters") and steps had also been constructed. The owner stated that he had been told by his contractors that all required permits had been obtained. The retaining walls are lo; ited on the approximate center of the shoreline, made of 6" timbers. I would estimate the hardcover at about 250 sf including steps and tops of planter timbers, or about 3 perrent in the 0-75' zone. The steps are obviously necessary in order to have access to the dock. Note however that this property also has a large dock southeast of Fagerness Point Road with relatively level lake access. No evidence has been presented to indicate whether the retaining waI1S are necessary to stabilize the bank, or whether they are designed and constructed for that purpose. I measured the slope at about 70 percent (19' of drop in a 28' run) which without some stabilization seems quite precarious. The submitted plans do not indicate the depth of the walls or how they are anchored into the hillside. The applicant has give me the impression that these walls are for aesthetic purposes and to help stabilize the stairway and not necessarily the hill. The planter terraces may have some benefit in slowing runoff which otherwise would run right down the hill. On the other hang, will retention and absorption of this runoff in the planter boxes cause saturation of the slope and possible sliding? The City Engineer has reviewed the plan presented and recommends that the owner substantiate the stability of the slope by submitting a report and recommendation from a qualified soils engineer. The rip -rapping done in 198', appears to have been necessary to stop erosion and undercutting of the banks. Approximately 30' of rip -rap was done, but the remainder appears to be needed as soon as possible. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to submit the bank stability information as recommended by the Engineer. Your recommendation for approval or denial could be conditional on staff review of this information, or yoo could table the application. MftR r To: F1anning Cnaimissian From: Michael F. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator - Date: October 15, 1984 Subject: #854, 6. Robert Jcihr-,. c,n, 1981 Fagr-•rness Point Road - Conditional Use F•er n,j t , 'Jar i ante - After The Fact This item was tabled at the August 20, 1984, meeting pending receipt of a survey showing the hardcover on the property and an eng1neer-irig report on the stability of the stairs and retaining wa1 1 s. List of Exhibits: Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - List of Property Owners Exhibit D - Survey Showing Hardcover Exhibit E - Letter From Applicant's Engineer Exhibit F - Retaining Wall Flan Exhibit G - Michael P. Gaffron's Memo of 8-I0-84 The applicant has submitted a survey with hardcover calculations for the entire property. The hardcover calculations submitted do not include the areas covered with gravel undr--rIain by plastic. The applicant is disputing our interpretation that this is considered hardcover. No evidence has been given to indicate the degree of permeability of the plastic underlay; however, on the site in the only area where the plastic was exposed, I found no holes in the plastic in a one square foot section. In the +-r-7--J' west zone, the graveled areas would include an additional 114r:r +/- s.f. for a total including the stairs and retaining walls of 1510 s.f. or about 20%. It appears that about half of this would run off to the east. In the 0-75' east zone, the graveled areas presumably underlain by plastic add about 280C) s.f. These areas have existed in this configuration for sometime. The newly repaved apron was existing the same size it is now. A strip of new pavement roughly 6' x 55' along the east side of the road was previously graveled. Overall, this end of the property apparently has not had a recent increase in hardcover, although it stands at about 40%. In the 75-2 50' "middle" zone, note that the hardcover e:rcluding the graveled areas and planters is already 35y. The new pavement betwir the house and road is about 675 s.f.; this was previnu-ply gr or old pavement. The gravel portion in this area, presun underlain by plastic is about another 2,100 s.f., for a total rdcover (excluding paved ;i_►' road) of 1 940 + 4-U + 3 60 + 360 + 675 ± 21UC) ().5"_-b = 54/ - - - The letter from HicF:ocl, It, Associates indicates that the timber walls and planter boxes are structurally stable, and suggests that the applicant reveqetate the slopes as soon as possible to prevent future erosion problems. The wall are apparently necessary to support the stairway but not necessarily needed to support the steep ban1:. The question remains, is the plastic adequately permeable or does it constitute hardcover? Would the gravel beds be considered hardcover without the plastic- How much of the newly installed retaining wall/planter/steps should be allowed to remain- How much must be removed? Is any further work: necessary, Such as tree planting'' Two of the possible options for recommendation open to the Planning Commission include: 1. Remove all hardcover placed within 15' of the lake at the west end. Have the applicant prove to your satisfaction that the existing plastic is permeable, or have him replace it with something that is. Note also that applicant is limited to 4 slips total for this property per LMCD standards. If you have not had a chance to see this property yet, a site inspection will help you to visualize the extent of the work done on this property. Aga. ;f� :• C l Y CITY OF O Building Permit Na Guilding Insp. 1. Footing I fruvdr4 3. 1s w latbn 4. t.Athtrg S. rtut Plumbing Insp. Sewage Insp. Electric Insp. Special LOCATION I q ?I FA ISSUED Cr _ 19 �:s TO WK4 Af kA int '�)r e �Q t X10 NOTE —All inspections must be called 24 hours in advance. This card must be posted in a conspicuous place on the premises on which the work is to be done. Work must not proceed until required inspections have been made. Destruction of this notice or your failure to comply with the Ordinances makes you haby)o the pena_jjcj4d Ypt)vided therein. Building Inspector TELEPHONE: 473.7357 RIP Rap Application qr rr ar...�r... ft _. M Z a... •.• .,mama • ........ Fee j Date raid-- — �1► RAP iNSVFr-T100 Data: _-- Address: —101 Re-soon for RIP Rap -- oo -prQYant iPre$jDa—j2d, -- — Length of Shoreline to be Rip Ropyed 101.4 - -- Plans SuErmltted: Yes _ -Ax Type of Rip Rap -JNAtIjrA1 f"jA ,Ltone Subject to MND Ferrell Name of Contractor Mtka. Portable Dredging Address of contractor 59Q W. Lake St. Rtrmarks At thia tlm@ Re are Only monin to _ e-nm ALA ,In tt `^f O/ner toot rector _— rhe.ema• Site Plan MHMJEHAMA C ENT LIUAMME,',C-vCID 0007210CT P.O. Bu 387. Y:=yznta, Virmezato 55"1 . , See reverse cldo for Inc--ucttons Do not writs ebm th!s lino 1. OWNER: C?:�k� ''I°a _►/[1rI/�SO�J ~ 2. APPLICtSM _rz'�j=! ,� • .'1 . ADORE-S:/7-, tfez Si pr1rY1� i ADD..^.t:C3: CITY: ZIP: �__-_v— CITY: PF0 f : PN01JE:._ BIQNATURE '6--4��•.. O Prt!Wnery pta rvAew A 8 ^ne Int�toYttrtr:.t o► It•�P..� O Orad1nCfDrdw"., Pt: n O E1: ��a� E'C.be~ : t':.�L•.':^..� for O 9rIC35' eutmt, or ut %ts Pic,--, L;.rrow...^��tt O flood I-►-ln Dotza;:ncnt O uco and cr;►rc:rtc•.lan of O P+rrm Crt�:.�„aa O Me? ' work and obtcC,tws: _�i'tP' �, CIE r�lttf� 1-� „jrr; � •^ '- i IertM P L-.- �i rj2A,2 doe 4% R t ,•,r. ,�sr,..,� t'n a r---��►r , �•ur--r-..... ' `'• _p�r...�. ,,. ` �•' j, �reMo1' lOt MCC s,MvW d� 't.or ����-���►r� s.�f�� %Oaf�a with other c��ltwlli :n�"E�: tlll"MI! �nP Tip/ * /1 ��'�!'40 _ •. �Y of water affected, -+-,ACt Call 473-4224 :or cs,Mtcnea In completing this form IF fill IF • a� 4��le�ittJ'iw6 :fiir rER�� Is` /iA'RO OV4potSp''. : •. rmr., zmv wormr . orw ` r - •� � •- '.�, - Te�c..t.:�r`T • • ` 6�tA�',�tnow'' •�,{witt'..Qg • " .. ..;h• . ,: �7�Vv �PsR�iP �it� wi t?Gr 0 :brat C.4p u. S-12, c AL 70,7i1 t.rvet�. /col or 7?!�P.�P /•S' �t ;'o-r.. �`%'�'�b ,. y.. �+ .. •� -t a ., +' IF If 'i •1 ._• � ,.f •J. - ;, �. 4 �t :y..., _ t: t;�'-. r -Y ._ nI , I'�� s•,i -�, .atnro te�.wn 0 MI01 MEW AN A CREEK WATEMNE® OUG7MCT P.O. Bait 387. Wayzata. Minnesota 55391 Mar a MANO n: O"W 11. Oudna, PM, • AIMA t. Uh a . hM t TMsrs • 8~ R C4.w l . COW116 0 Andu all tall "4034101146 ■1R,•1D,1 �:; Permit Application No: 83-77 Uate: September 19, 1983 Applicant: Robert Johnson 1981 Fagerness Point Road Yayzita, MN 55391 Location: City of Orono, Sec. 18AUC, Fagerness Point, Mr-t Are Bay - lake Minnetonka Purpose: Placement of 1U1 lineal feet of rip rap shoreline erosion protection At the regularly scheduled September 15, 1983 meeting of the Board of Managers, the subject permit application was reviewed a.ong with the following exhibits: 1. Permit application received August 1U, 1983. 2. Property plat oat undated. 3. Site Plan and typical cross section prepared by B. Niccum received August 1U, 1983. 4. Permit File No. 82-32. The Board approved the permit application as submitted. This document is your permit from the bCUU. It is valid for one (1) year. If construction is not complete within one (1) year, an extension must be requested. Please contact the District at 473-4224 when the project is about to commence so an inspector may view the work in progress. EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for the Distri t Kichael A. Panzer, P. . September 19 1983 ate of Issue bt cc: 8^ary 6. Macomber a.--R"Tty of Orono H. Ni ccum . t1nlY s�` lives- r , h. lr —M r-� . r-1-1 • W! . r— s c- i . ��, e. tr---. • wt-�s �� -+ Poroit Appiicn Lion 13o: 02-32 April 16. 1982 Appliccnt: G. Retcrt Johnson 1r.01 Fcrcr-r.c,s Point Road 11c" Zato, 1:-;nncsota 55391 Location: of Sec. 10. City of Orono. Fagerness Point. Vest Arm, Lct:e Uirnctonfta Purpose: log lineal Feet of rip rap shoreline erosion protection At the regularly scheduled April 15, 1982 meeting of the Doard of tannoCors, tt:e subject pornit application was reviewed along with thv foilotiinq cnhibits: 1. Pernit application received Appril 7, 1982. 2. Site r..cp received April 7, 19t32. 3. A stotccont Crap the applicant (Exhibit r) rhich indicntes ecr.?liancc r1 h the 11CUD Shoreline Erosion Protection Guideline received April 7, 1902. The Board tpproved the permit application with the folliwing conditions: 1. The rip rap shall placed no core than 5 feet lake -lard of the shoreline at an elevation of 924.40 HGVD, 1929. 2. The filter blonttet raterial and placement shall be in accordance with tit!/DUT 36010. Failure to comply aith ail the terms and conditions in this pernit is a misderennor. The pornit terns may be el!forced by crininal prosecution, lnjunctlon, restoration or ebaterent. Minnesota Statute 112.89. this docer_cnt is your pornit grog the KCMG. It is valid for one (1) year. If construction is not cooplete within one (1) year, an extension oust be requested. Please contact the District at 473-4224 when the project is tl'out to cocnence ro an inspector may view the work In progress. cc: Board p c iceli►. i�aa0r. %.k . /0or G.,Xetomber !.City of Orono 4/15/82 F. Mixa. LMCD aata of I-6�ue bt MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 20, 1984. PAGE. 7 1852 WILLIAM GRE:GORY Mrs. Gregory stated that her only problem with tabling the application is that they want to put in a swimming pool and would like to use the fill from this pool to fill in wetlands. Kelley asked staff :o check into whether one of the wetlands has already beer. altered. Kelley noted that it looked like it had already been disturbed. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that staff will ask for confirmation of the contours. Kelley moved, Adams seconded, to table the conditional use permit pending receipt of additional information on the dredging of designated wetlands and for staff to check into whether , he wetland has been disturbed as of this date. Motion, Ayes (7), Nays (0). McDonald noted that the spoils should be kept further than 50' from the edge of the wetlands because it is closer to Lake Minnetonka if this wetlands was allcwe-' to be dredged. Mabusth asked Planning Commission to act separately on the retaining wall. Rovegno moved, Adams seconded, to approve the retaining wall subject to the following conditions: 1. Hay bales remain along the bottom of the disturbed bank until completion of the wall. 2. Applicant to submit construction --design infor- mation for Engineer review to assure the wall will retain the banks. a) Footage b) Cross Profile 3. Payment to the City for variance application of $100. Motion, Ayes (7), Nays (0). #85 OBERT JOHNSON 81 PAGERNESS POINT RD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 9:20 - 9:21 PM Robert Johnson was present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. Gaffron noted that this was an after -the -fact application. Chairperson Goetten stated that. a hardcover calculation should be done. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 20, 1984. PAGE H #854 ROBERT JOHNSON Robert Johnson stated that he had instructed the contractor to get the permit and that he had assumed that the contractor nad obtained the permit from the City. Johnson stated that the rip rapping was done las# ir. Johnson stated that only tre planters have bee-- red this year. Sime stated that _.t is already there and it d-.es look nice. Kelley stated that the Planning Commission needs a good hardcover calculation. McDonald moved, Kelley seconded, to table the Johnson, application pending receipt of a survey showing all hardcover on the property Motion, Ayes (7), Nays (0). Adams stated that on the steep slope there are three living stumps. Adams stated that the applicant should have to replace the trees with an equal size. Adams stated that the rip rapping that was done actually extended his shoreline out into the lake. Adams stated that there is a severe hardcover problem. Adams stated that the stairs only should be allowed and that the planters zhould be reviewed by a soils engineer. Adams stated that the applicant should have to make a trade off in hardcover. Adams stated that the applicant should be fined. #855 CHOICE WOOD COMPANY 2500 BELLY AVENUE SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW Dale Mulfinger and Mary Rollwagen represented the Choice Wood Company. Mulfinger stated that this is a PRD with 9 units. Mulfinger stated that he doesn't like to think of it as 9 units but as 4 duplex units and one single family residential house because it w:11 be 5 buildings instead of 9. Mulfinger sated that this PRD is designed to minimize environmental impact on the land. Mulfinger stated that these are tuck under garages. Mulfinger stated that there is one single family home. Mulfinger stated that there would be a homeowners association to help with the maintenance. Chairperson Goetten asked what the square footage of each building would be. Mulfinger stated approximately 1,500 sf. Rovegno asked if this was a PRD with both wetlands and density credits. Roveann stated that he felt there are too many dwelling units on this property. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEFTING HEIR) OCT09F:R 22, 1984 PAGE 4 5 �OBERT JOHNSON 1 FAGERNESS POINT RD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Robert Johnson was present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaff ron noted -that this application was tabled at the August Planning Commission meeting pendi .g receipt of a survey showing all hardcover and an engineering report on the stai)ility'of the stairs and •etaining walls. Gaff ron noted that the City is in receipt of both the survey and report. Adams stated that he is concerned about the increase in hardcover on the property. Adams stated that the rip rap that was done extended out into the lake fartn�-r then what should have been allowed. Adams stated that it appears that work was done with the 0-75' setback area to increase the hardcover beyond the scope of the rip rapping permit. Adams stated that at the last meeting he noted the trees that had been removed within the 0-75' setback area. Adams stated that this should be investigated. Chairperson Goetten stated that there is too much hardcover on the property. Goetten stated that some of the hardcover, maybe the gravel areas, should be removed. Goetten asked if the guest house noted on the survey is used 3s a guest house. Robert Johnson stated that the guest house is rot used as a quest house. Kelley stated that the hardcover on the property is in excess. Kelley stated that he has a problem with the excessive hardcover, the guest house, and the rip rapping that was done. Kelley noted that the property should be restored to its original state before the work commenced. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the i applicant would need to file for a conditional use if that "guest house" noted on survey was ever to be used as a guest house. Kelley asked Johnson how many trees were removed. Robert Johnson stated three trees were removed but not within the 75' setback area. Johnson stated that he got 3 permit for the rip rapping. Johnsen stated that he thought that the other work was covered under the permit that Niccum originally took out the year before. Adams stated that there were stumps with shoots growing out of them. Adams stated that the trees had clearly been cut. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HF1,D OCTOBER 22, 1984. PAGE 5 #854 ROBERT JOHNSON Kelley stated that maybe the Planning Commission should direct staff to have a professional forester look at the trees. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that if a professional needs hiring, that it would be at the applicant's expense, not the City's expense. Rovegno moved, Adams seconded, to deny the conditional use permit request of Robert Johnson to increase the hardcover based on the f inding that work has been done without a k,ermit and that hardcover is significantly excessive on the property and that such wort, would have required a variance, and Planninq_ Commission recommends the following conditions: 1. That dll hardcover should be removed which has been installed since 1983 which exceeds the code requirements. 2. If any trees over 6" in diameter that have been cut down are found within the 75' setback area, that the applicant be issued a citation and staff to take action accordingly subject to City code. 3. City places applicant on notice that the "guest house" noted on the survey requires a conditional use permit should applicant decide to start uFing this as a guest house. Motion, Ayes (7), Nays (0). #870 GARY VALENTA 1160 TOWNLINE ROAD VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 8:35 - 8:36 PM Gary Valenta was present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. Chairperson Goetten closed the public hearing at 8:36 p.m. since no one was present in the audience for this public hearing. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that the applicant wishes to construct an attached garage and cannot place the garage elsewhere because of the septic system location and the topography of the land. Rovegno asked if the proposed location of the garage will compromise any future alternate drainfield site. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaf f ron stated no that it would not affect the alternate septic site. 1 • Q OU T LAt-' • ON R 0.p 0 • s STknnPS t,3cb'r# L ! k i (pFwfpJL+M) 1& LlAwr'? tie Ivel4 .S) $•ruh,►p u/15.P *14'rX LE -7 nuTS B — 4.� it .1 � N — `ii)4C( �0.K17 y�jr�►N'7 S/rdJN,•: STuW�f W/trltCuTS D I2" Ces►T�� D - q 2 ti ST1/lw� P - ,� c Tr,Fb ' P - (�•'' C Lug ? - PM w -' 170 C w/S pRou rs . E Q_ j� " C,,, C. c P� c P R e+u- s Dr/► G 7It jZ - /o: ,Z" 5,��� �� w,.•-�K! Sr`+:'n w- s 3u i'TMw"iP3 t�.rTN �'�tOvts '! S 8 + t►Nc. t t r�� .SPROv * S h — GI.tA.-to pf 3 - 3� T CLUMP OF 2 - Na (�(' %O��tiD 64►cr� No $P,ED��S J 214 " u yr - A'r 20' k � - tO-ZLtt G WW-f SPR01. -rs 1 a dGtEATt,I<' rMy N4v ' Z - Sr1v6.t t W,j11A,.,y sPROtI"S srrN ALIVE W11•rN GWT- - SIN(-tt �yw//MIME`/ �1=,;^:�-S AJtAmrjem4"' 1-2" sTot+os , If Post Office Box 66•CrysLai Bay, Minnesolt Y)323•Municipa1 01fues On the North Shore o/ Lake Minnetonka November 21., 1984 Mr. Erling Falk 1055 Tuscany Place Winter Park, FL 32789 Dear Mr. Falk: I am requesting your assistance in a matter of great concern to the City of Orono. The current owners of the property at 1981 Fagerness Point Road have apparently made some recent and drastic changes to the west lakeshore of the property, in that at least 10 trees of 6" diameter or greater appear to have been removed, all. the brush has been removes:, (essentially the 100' of shoreline has been clearcut), a retaining wall/planter/stairway structure has been constructed, and a deck has been constructed. As the previous owner of this property, I am sure you are familiar with the steep slopes at this location and the tendency for wave and ice action to undermine the shoreline. Our particular concern is that the tree cutting and construction work appears to have totally changed the character and nature of the lakeshore bank. This is in violation of City ordinances which do not allow cutting of live trees 6" or more in diameter within 75' of the shore, and does not allow any hardcover ( steps, decks, etc) within the 75' lakeshore area. The current owner, Mr. Johnson, was forced to apply for a variance and conditional use permit after -the -fact, and is stating that he did not cut any live trees, and that a stairway and dock previously existed on the west lakeshore. tllllill\�,d/��'I\�, J'I71�' • %IINII\14%Ik%110%AIIN%\l1 4'4'+w • Mlu M► Mr. Erling Falk Page 2 November 21, 1984 It would be extremely helpful if you could help us establish just what the property was like when you sold it. Specifically: 1. How many 6" or greater live trees were standing at the lakeshore area, and what were there locations? Please refer to the attached sketch. 2. Was there an existing stairway, and what was its condition? 3. Was there an existing dock, and what was its condition? It is important that we establis;-1 for the record the condition of the property before the Johnson's acquired it. We would appreciate a short note from you, or even a collect call (612- 473-7357) if you could help us in this matter. Sincerely, Michael P. Gaffron Assistant Zoning Administrator ps Enclosure CERTIFIED 4a M Novembee 28,1984 Michael P. Gaffron A%s't Zoning Administration City Of Orono Dear Sir; L9C9�Lq�c;r! DM - .,.y_,m DEC 198d Inregard your letter of 11/21 as to the property at 1981 Fagerness Point, Orono, Mn. 1/ We cut down some large trees because of Dutch Elm desease.. There were probably two large trees left that we didn't because pf the difficulty of removing same. 2/ The stairway on the west bank was concrete with some metal pipe railings left. The bottom of the 0 OF RONOr concrete steps was wrecked by an ice jam in the spring a few years aga. 3/ The dock was in poor condition with only a few old posts left. Yours truly, �. November 28,1984 Michael P. Gaffron AS;s't Zoning Administration City Of Orono Dear Sir; -- DEC L__ Inregard your letter of 11/21 as to the property at 1981 Fagerness Point, Orono, Mn. 1/ We cut down some large trees because of Dutch Elm desease.. There were probably two large trees 'Left that we didn't because pf the difficulty of removing same. 2/ The stairway on the west bank was concrete with some metal pipe railings left. The bottom of the concrete steps was wrecked by an ice jam in the spring a few years aga. j/ The dock was in poor conditimn with only a few old posts left. Yours truly, f4o 545 Indian Mound Wayzata. Minnesota 55391 (612) 473-4224 November 21, 1984 Ms. Jean Mabusth City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Jean: III I spoke with you several weeks ago about a property owned by Mr. Robert Johnson. We discussed what you do and do not consider to be hard surface areas. Specifically, you stated that a polyethylene sheet with holes punched in it so that water could infiltrate would tot be considered a hard surface. After some brief calculations, I feel that if the plastic sheeting is punctured by app-oximately 10 to 15 4-inch diameter holes per square foot, the infiltration rat! will be adequate to prevent any ponding or runoff. If you need additiGn al information, please contact me. Very truly yours, EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES im Mahady, Engineer 1 bt 1•,/�.t.� � .��,/ .wG ,vim•-.�- ,c.��.w�, �,•, �� .�.�",�. ,-�,�-fit' � ��- �/� o`-t-l� ep,w,/ � goo �� - n ✓ 6 D & L TREE SERVICE DUTCH ELM 6 OAK WILT REMOVAL TREE TRIMMING & PRUNING FREE ESTIMATES Duke Hamman Dave Anderson 544-0815 427-2621 Mrs. Carol A. Johnson 1981 Fagerness Point Rd. Wayzata, Mn 55391 Dear Mrs. Johnson: You requested that. I put in writing the tree trimming/removal activity on trees over six inches or more in diameter which we did for you or observed on the back bank (West Arm side) of your property since you moved in. We have removed only one such tree which was an Elm that had Dutch Elm disease. This tree was approximately 24 - 30 inches in diameter and was the third of three Elms of this size. The other two had been removed before you moved in and also showed evidence of Dutch Elm disease. On these two we lowered the stumps since they had been stumped rather high. It, each case, at your direction we left the stumps in place so that the root system would help gold the bank in place. The only location where a stump was ground out was not actually on the bank, but just back from the bank. This was the tree on the corner of the property which was severly damaged during the storm in 1982 and fell across your son's fort. As for trimming, we have done only the Ash on the bank where the rope swing is. It is still questionable whether the trimming done will help this tree survive, but we are hopeful that we can have the same sucess as with the large Maple by the house which now appears to have been saved by reason of the trimming which we did in 1982. Of course, there is still a concern that the one on the bank even if it again blossoms will eventually be lost due to ero:.-on from the lake wave action just like other trees of your neighbors which are actually leaning in the water. I shculd also mention that because of your desire to encourage or plant additional cover on the bank, we cut back the existing vegetation (primarily black thornberry bushes) to approximately a one and one half foot height. This allowed Bachman's to better see the spacing of what was there and what would compliment it. As you know we did not remove any of the vegetation. A1rhough you need to rely on someone like Barhmao 's for what could be added to the bank, in our experience the -:-st an, long term survival of major tree growth does not sug,�esr planting additional trees on the bank. Your desire for substanr4al `ree growth may have to be satisfied with the many other trees you have already planted cn the property. However_, the trimming of the existing bank veb='ation may also allow for some of the small tree seedlings which ;e foun(' — prosY:r. You also rer:ested that. we indicate our recollections of the old stairway on the back bank. This stairway was concrete with no side edging and in a bad need of replacement. It was straight up and down and approximately four foot wide with the bottom third having been washed out. 'Ibis must have occurred some time before you moved in because there was a lot of erosion where the broken away portion had been and part of the old concrete was laying in sections in the water. If you need any further information, please let me know. Sincerely, City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAI. ZONING CODE. SECTION 10.03 SUBDIVISION 19 AND APPROVING A VARIANCE, TO ZONING CODE SECTION 10.55 SUBDIVISION 8 AND SECTION 10.22 SUBDIVISION 2 FILE NO. 854 WHEREAS, G. Robert Johnson (hereafter "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 1981 Fagerness Point Road within the City of Orono (hereafter "City") and Icgally described as follows: Lot 4, Fagerness P.ennepin County, Minnesota (hereafter "property") and, WHEREAS, the applicant has made an after -the -fact applicaticn to the City to permit the construction of stairs, retaining walls, and planters within 75' of Lake Minnetonka, and to permit the placement of hardcover in excess of the al loved hardcover in the 0-75 foot and 75-250 foot lakeshore setback zones, requesting a Conditional Use Permit her 1.1un.icipal Zoning Code Section 16.03 Subdivision 19 and variances to Section 10.55 Subdivision 8 and Section 10.22 Subdivision 2. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counc41 of Orono, ?Minnesota: )INGS I. This application waf• viewed a Toning File No. 854. 2. The property is located in the I,P-1C Lakeshore Residential Zoninq District. 3. The Orono Planning c'ommission reviewed this application at the.i r August 20, 1984 and October 22, 1984 meetings, and recommended denial of a conditional Use Permit based on the following findings: a) Work was done with(,ut the required permits. b) Hardcover on the property is r'xcc: and the increases in hardcover weulc'. have require variance. Paqe I City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Planning Commission further recommended the all hardcover in excess of that allowed by code, been installed by the current owner since 1981. remova 1 of which has 4. City staff has investigated the removal of 6" diameter or larger trees within 75' of the lakeshor.e on this property, and based on information provided by the current owner, previous owner, and applicant's tree service, finds that no solid evidence exists to indicate any live trees 6" in diameter or larger were removed. 5. A dock and a concrete stairway did exist previously in the approximate locations of the newly constructed stairs, planters, walls, and. dock. The applicant has a substantial right to create a safe lake access on the west sic.'e of the property. 6. City Staff has observed the lakeshore stairs, planters, and walls, anti has reviewed the information on the stability of the structure provided by the applicant's engineer, and concludes from the evidence presented and apparent, that the structure appears sufficiently stable. 7. Design of the planter structure is such that the net run-off is not significantly changed frcr that of the original stairs and slope. 8. To remove this structure and restore the grade to its original slope would likely cause erosion detrimental to the lake. 9. The rock beds with polyethylene sheet underlayment are considered to he hardcover. If the polyethylene sheet under.laymEnt is perforated with 10 to 15 1/4" diameter holes per square foot, it will not Le considered as hardcover. 10. The hardcover originally existing on this property prior to recent construction of the wa l Is, steps, and rock beds, was as follows: 0-75' west Lakeshore. . . . . . . 2% 75-250' Central Area.. . . . . . �5% 0-75' East Lakeshore. . . . . . .27% Page 2 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. The stairway, planters, and cent to the south side approximately 10 feet into the City retaining walls located of the house extent] right-of-way. 12. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on thi, -)roperty are peculiar to it and do not -apply general l.y t( -ne property in this zoning district: the granting of the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the owner, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial propei'v right of the owner; and would be in keeping with the pirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 13. The City Council finds that granting a Con-litional Use Permit to the applicant for th.., t-intinui, 7.1 of the nonconforming structure and hardrover w . not be detrimental to the health, safety or general w .,re of the public, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and the level of use of the property limited by the lertinent sections for nonconforming structures within the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Rased up )n the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit per 7.onirg Code Section 10.03 Subdivision 19 and granting variances to Section 10.55 Subdivision 8 and Section 10.22 Subdivision 2 to G. Robert Johnson to permit the construction of planters, stairs and retaining walls within 75 feet of Lake Minnetonka and to approve 3% hardcover (250 square feet) in the 0-75' Lakeshore setback Zone (w st side) where 0% is a] lowed, to approve 371 hardcover (5500 square feet) in the 75-250' Lakeshore Setback lone where only 251A is allowed, and approve 14% hardcover (1500 square feet) in the 0-75' Lakeshore Setback 7.or. - (east side) where 08 is allowed, subject to the following conditionE: 1. Al I plastic -covered rock hods on the property must be perforated at a density of 10-15 1/4" holes per square foot, to be verified by City staff upon completion. 2. Applicant must obtai,. an after the -fact construction permit for all existing retaining wall/plantar/stairway structurcc which were recently installed. Pages 3 City of ORONO RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL NO. The stairway/planter/retaining wall structure adjacent to the south side of the house must be reconstructed so that it will extend no farther into the right-of-way than the existing planter box on the east side of the house. 4. The retaining wali/planter/stairway structures shall be brought into compliance with pertinent sections of the bui 1ding code. 5. Applicant is placed on notice that this property contains excessive amounts of hardcover over that allowed as noted above, and that any future improvements to this property involving an increase in hardcover must be matched with the removal of existing hardcover. 6. Authorities granted by these variances run with the property not with the owner, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for an after -the -fact construction permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (December 10, 1985). 7. Violation of or noncompliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. B. The undersigned owner has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this loth clay of Dc ember, 1984. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hal in, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor (1) Propert owner 11,itw 4 ` /�DIt4%Sef/t40. ItOSL�te� 1`I Z(i� G( 4�i:►('��_ �� / •//� fk•� R c-of. P.! .` •_ __ -. --. -.-- _, — _-- _ '-�__- _ � Arm G A-4..:,r., P ! R-AM N Rau-r. P L Ar:A A Gomim P E. rhom" E- heyn P.E. R.rAeN H. Fower. I.F. . 1 �S IV 1-.A .+Vyi..y 36- - --` = — _ J•WAA Ae,lr.!•., P f P.-.V:ud R�1rn G .ids-IMI, P E &• /�.-,-r, M"..w6 531M 4 /M-tw,. P t R•AirsL 1-nw. PE. Mn.0 1. S-nrN. I E DOWNC. R-rprfr, I£ P -.. 642 - 6.16.41600 !eww C IMw•- P L J" A llrrNr•-. P.£ Mok .l. He".-*. P F. red s r.rV, r £ MWhW4 r Renr-w r F R-1 P. rA11gr4, P,*- November 21, 1984 0.wfQtalk, .- PE. c•-.I<, A P rl,ow Leo 11 Pr•.lf* He.l.• ,N ' Ift" City of Orono lox 66 COUNCIL MEETING Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Mr. John Gerhardson Re: File No. 13923 Navarre Force Main Dear John, DEC 10 1984 CITY OF ORONO Enclosed please find the signed easement agreement from Net Leased Property Investors. Also enclosed is a bill from their attorney in the amount of $230.20 which we would recommend for payment. if you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK b ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:li Encl. 4642c LAW O:I1r[6 ESTES PARSIN EN & LEVY A P110I[SSIONAL ASSOCIATION 700 PILLSBUR ' CENTER ..0— D PANS -NC- 200 SOUTH SIXTH STREET c fuwKc NINoa HURRAY P. KLANC w D. [aT[• MI-4 �APOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 f. TODD RAPP POBERT A. Le— nOwAwO J_ wV SIN cwlc •. wcNULTz oAVIo w. r+.Lw[A JAC■ A.wOff[wD TELEPHONE ICON I, fTCIH 1[w0 f COTT L. ANDCwf ON 16121 33 -2M fwVCC • JAw[f DANICL J. SICwf DOw/ TELEX IlI121 ]]3-0700 wCf[CCA J. w D.N.CL November 16, 1984 Mr. Glenn R. Cook Ronestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 West Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 Re: Navarre Sanitary Sewer Your File No. 13923 Dear Glenn: Enclosed please find the temporary easement executed by Net Leased Property Investors and the consent to the easement executed by Super Valu Stores, Inc. and M id-Tonka, Inc. Pursuant to your letter of last month, you agree to reimburse my client for the legal fees involved. I am enciosing a statement for our legal fees of $225.00. Thank you for your cooperation. t Y?urs truly, John Parsinen JP/csm Enclos^res C-60 ESTES PARSINEN & LEVY A P"Of[SSIONAL ASSOCIATION 700 PILLSBURY CENTER 210 SOUTH SIXTH STREET MINNEAPOLiS, MINNESOTA 66402 16121333.2111 November 19, 1984 MR GLENN R. COOK BONFSTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. 2335 WEST TRUNK HIGHWAY 36 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55113 PLEASE RETURN UPPER PORTION WITH YOUR REMITTANCE TO FILL LE -GAL SERVICES REK.�:]RE7 RECkRCING REVIEWI14G IIJCATIrJN OF FM7-70JT; DRAFTING CONSENTS AND CIRCULATING INSTRLM NIS. FOR DISBURSEMENTS AS FOLLOWS: REPRODUCTION $5.20 OUR FILE: 1203/5 TOTAL SERVICES: $225.00 TOTAL DISBURSEMIM : $ 5.20 TOTAL SERVICES AND DISBURSEM01IS: $230.20 ESTES PARSINEN & LEVY P A ,.o E.►Ests "CUwpto 9UT Nor r.c kq)4t, N s . 1 Mf ll w•i, M Sus"TTto AT A LATER OATS ff 2335 V. I.....A 36 St P../, M.....,.k 55113 PA_ &.2 - 636- 4600 December 5, 1984 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Ray, MN 55323 At-tn: John Gerhardson Re: Navarre Force Main b L.S. 97 Our File No. 13923 Dear John: nuo L Nn.nmou, PI N++hrr A Nnm.e, P 1 h,vf+A l Am1r,U. I' 1 Nrodfn,J . 1. emlr,R, PI N. had I bras',, III COUNC1L MFEv", ULC 10 1984 G ITY OF ORONO Ghn. R ('n A. P 1 An,A A GwJun, P 1 Mu Aa,d 14' 1ww. P I N,,h,t fr SrA,.nn hr, P I Afa,.+n f Sw ole, l+ 1 1 r did (- R.vle,di, P L Ierr. A Rowdnn. P £ .Af.,A A !foam., P.L hd A !.Ad, P. £ N. ho,l f Rods.... P £ Rah r /l PlefffrAr, PC 110, d O LawAw., P £ (fhmM, A Ewkw. 10, Al Po.WSA) Ilya. %f Oh.. Enclosed please find two copies of the second Request for Payment for the above referenced project. This work has been satisfactorily completed and we recommend payment. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:sas Encl. ffDEC 6 t4m 4845c ? i� nr 011` "_"3 r1� �•'� &,A-V4 '- P If Row", P f R. Awd M I wew. P I 1—rh 1 A MMM. ► f R. Ar., 1. S M, A,. P ► 2335 V. `1....A 36— A.wr...d 1 I.wIW,. P I Af..... I U. r ► M....d I i...w. P I I —*W 1 &-or-4,. P► SI P...l. M•-- 55113 I...r. 1 , w..M P I I.... A R ..a.. P I PA.... 612-636-4600 Af..A 4 If..... PI ImA Iwo. Pf U.ArN r goon... r f MAW R Iyt11u, r /grid tl I olAw.. P I- t'A.r411 frrlr. I — Alf re-f r IIwAr. 1/ tMw December 5, 1984 UNC,� �,�EETING CO City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: John Gerhardson GJT Y of O R p N 0 Re: Navarre Force Main 6 L.S. d7 Our File No. 13923 Dear John: Enclosed please find two copies of the second Request for Payment for th/- above referenced project. This work has been satisfactorily completed and we recommend payment. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENEE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. / / Glenn R. Cook GRC:sas Enc1. 4845c REQUEST FOR PAYMENT DATE: November 30, 1984 FOR PERIOD: PLACE: Orono, Minnesota _ From: Oct. 20, 1984To Nov. 29, 1984 PROJECT: Navarre Force Main 6 Lift Station #7 - San. Sewer PROJECT NO.: FILE NO.: 13923 CONTRACTOR: B 6 U Contracting ADDRESS: 6130 Sunset Drive Mound, Minnesota 55364 REQUgST 'FOR PAYitF.NT NO.: 2 SUMMARY: 1. Original Contract Amount 2. Change Order - ADDITION $ _ 2,800.00 3. Change Order - DEDUCTION $ 4. Revised Contract Amount 5. Value Completed to Date 6. Material on Hand 7. Amount Earned 8. Less Retainage 5 X 9. Sub -Total 10. Less Amount Paid Previously 11. AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 2 OWNER APPROVAL: By - By Date: $ 102,926.28 $ 105,726.28 S 97,784.33 $ _ 0.00 $ 97,784.33 $ 4,889.22 $ 92,895.11 $ 59,576.00 33,319.11 Approved By: BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK b ASSOCIATES, INC. Approved By:_ B 6 D Contracting Contractor By: 3826c Project: Navarre Force Main 6 Lift Station V San. S. Orono, Minnesota Contractor: B 3 D Contracting STATEMENT OF WORK Payment No: 2 File No: 13923 Date: Nov. 30, 1984 Unit Est'd Quantity Amount Contract Item Unit Price Quantity To Date To Date PART I - FORCE MAIN 6" DIP force main L.F. $24.37 1,278 1,298 $31,632.26 Standard 4' diam. air release manhole w/1642B cstg. Ea. 1,746.22 1 1 1,746.22 Cut 6" DIP into existing manholes Ea. 1,250.00 1 1 1,250.00 Jack or auger 6" DIP P.E. L.F. 77.50 170 170 13,175.00 Cut VDIP into existing 6" force main Ea. 1,725.00 1 1 1,725.00 C.I. fittings Lbs. 1.18 600 600 708.00 Mechanical trench compaction L.F. 1.25 1,278 1,298 1,622.50 Common excavation C.Y. 2.98 750 457 1,361.86 Class 5 aggregate base T. 7.38 1,090 358.65 2,646.84 AC-1 bitum. material for mixture T. 210.00 20 14.94 3,137.40 2331 bitum. base course mixture T. 19.95 250 15 299.25 2341 bitum. wearing course mixture T. 22.90 120 255 5,839.50 Bituminous curb (Type "B") L.F. 5.25 450 491 2,577.75 Remove bituminous surfacing S.Y. 5.25 1,250 931 4,887.75 Remove b replace CB or MH cstg. Ea. 1,875.00 2 2 3,750.00 Cross under existing water main Ea. 445.00 2 2 890.00 Cross existing water service Ea. 450.00 2 2 900.00 Sod w/3" topsoil S.Y. 4.50 1,200 1,630 7,335.00 TOTAL PART I - FORCE MAIN..... $85,484.33 Page 1. 3826c Project: Navarre Force Main 6 Lift Station #7 San. S. Orono, Minnesota Contractor: B 6 D Contracting Contract Item PART II - LIFT STATION NO. 7 REVISIONS Lift Station No. 7 revisions CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 15" PVC Storm Sewer Payment No: 2 File No: 13923 Date: Nov. 30. 1984 STATEMENT OF WORK Unit E s t ' d Quantity Amount Unit Price Quantity To Date To Date L.S. $9,500.00 L.S. L.S. $9,500.00 TOTAL PART II -LIFT STATION #7 REV..... $9,500.00 L.F. $16.00 175 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. I...... TOTAL PART I - FORCE MAIN TOTAL PART II - LIFT STATIO14 #7 REVISIONS TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE...... 175 $2.800.00 �2'60U.UU $85,484.33 9,500.00 1) Ann nn Page 2. 3820C COUNCIL MEETING wi /3a.s�.s�ieloo, Ka1,�.rs, fYhr�rdl�iit �r fYd�oci�,ei, Jirc. ..,f 36 sJ 1)-a, Af__ .. 551f3 Pic_ 6f2.636-4600 December 7, 1984 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: John Gerhardson Re: TH 12 Sewer Repair b Ditch Grading Our File No. 13925 Dear John: 0 E C 10 1984 W-VZF OR /r.vpA! .I.,k,!.l. PI k"I.,11. ,, I.... Ar, PE N,mf4„ I -1 I r.4r,l. l I .Meru. I S,~46. PE R..e,d f lu,nn. P I DomM C. 6nprdl, P.E J.Rrn ! lJbuR. /' L terry A Iwrlo.. P E .VeM A H*RAOR. P E red A fwM. P. E A hwq ♦ RwfRNM. P E Robs R Pfdffvk, P.E Arad o Lo.Ade. PE C ,An A &w*m rr Lm .N. Peseaky 'ferkR At rm— Enclosed please find two (2) copies of Request for Payment No. 1 for the above referenced project. The work has been satisfactorily completed and we recom- mend payment to F. F. Jedlicki, Inc. Yours very truly, BONTSTY00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK b ASSOCIATES, INC. Harlan M. Olson HMO:sas Enc 1. 4878c REQUEST FOR PAYMENT DATE: December 5, 1984 _ FOR PERIOD: PLACE: Orono, Minnesota From: Nov. 1, 1984 To Nov. 30, 1984 PROJECT: Trunk Highway 12 Sanitary Sewer Repair 3 Ditch Grading PROJECT NO.: FILE NO.: 13925 _ COMPLETION DATE: November 911984 CONTRACTOR: F. F. Jedlicki, Inc. ADDRESS: 14203 W. 62nd Street Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: f_- 1 ` —_ - SUMMARY: 1. Original Contract Amount 2. Change Order - ADDITION $ 3. Change Order - DEDUCTION $ _ 4. Revised Contract Amount 5. Value Completed to Dar 6. Material on Hand 7. Amount Earned 8. Less Retainage 5 X 9. Sub -Total 10. Less Amount Paid Previously 11. AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR FAYMENT NO.: I OWNER APPROVAL: By Date: $ 13,050.00 $ 13,050.00__ $ 121300.00 $ 0.00 $ 12,300.00 $ 61`_.00 $ 11,685.00 $ 0.00 $ 11,685.00 Approved By: BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK S ASSOCI TES, INC. By Approved By: F. F. Jedlicki, Inc. Conrractor By:__ ♦S33C Project: Trunk Sanitary Sewer & Ditch Grading Orono, Minnesota Contractor: F. F. Jedlicki, Inc. STATEMENT OF WORK Unit Contract Item Unit Price SEWER REPAIR 3 DITCH GRADING Clear and grub L.S. $800.00 Ditch grading C.Y. 4.00 Replace 10' of 10" truss pipe between MH 9 and MH 10 as per details L.S. 6,000.00 Seeding w/seed (Mixture 7), Payment No: 1 File No: 13925 Date: Dec. 5, 1984 Eat uantit L.S. 1,000 L.S. mulch and 3" topsoil Ac. 1,500.00 1.5 TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE.... :ity Amount Date To Date L.S. $800.00 1,000 4,000.00 L.S. 6,000.00 1.0 1,500.00 $12,300.00 4532c '002 DEC 3 W ' CITY OF ORONO ' THOMAS 0. CREIG,ITON OIRtCT DIAL NU..eea (612) 3u-1sea O'CON NOR & HANNAN ATTORNEYS AT LAW aeon 1 0 s TOWER 00 SOUTH CIGHTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402-2254 leis) 3+1-3600 TELEX 29-0584 TELCCOPIER 612 :04--3600 256) MEMORANDUM t,•-Te •00 «,«v.o.. o. a.., (foal so?-..00 tulle .I00 O«e V«67eO a... Cew.e„ 9—ce. 09-90. C01.0-00 00003 1j,071 430 .1100 veuaovat, a• «.04M. 111.1. .a.. a..00 TO: Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission - Directors and Alternates and City Administrators .-�'•� FROt• Thomas D. Creighton, Legal Counsel V DATE. November 30, 1984 ` RE: -o-oming Meeting This is to remind you and notify you of the December meeting of the Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission. The meeting is scheduled for 5:30 p.m., December 11, 1984, in the Shorewood City Offices. An agenda will be forwarded to you at a later date. however, please find enclosed proposed public access rules from Dow -Sat of Minnesota. Your franchise requires that they submit such access rules to you for your approval prior to their implementation. The necember meeting will be very important. On the agenda wi�-IIthe restructuring of the Lake Minnetonka Commission possibly into an executive body which meets monthly with either quarterly or semi-annual meetings of the entire Commission. Obviously, this will effect all of you and is a significant charge in the ..anagement of the cable system. Those in attendance at the last few meetings (those few) determined that if the level of attendance continues to be as low as has been demonstrated, the orderly administration of Dow -Sat of Minnesota's cable �;ystem in the Lak-2 Minnetonka area will be significantly impaired. The options available to the Commission and the supporting documentation has not yet been drafted, but an attempt will be made ,xecutive committee to have that material for you fir;, r December meeting so that it may be discussed and acte�_ yoir December meeting and sent to your city counci- the appropriate amendments to the joint powers agreement. Memory:, -hake Minnetonka Novembt J , 1984 Page Twu Again, this is possibly the most sign4ficant discussion your Commission will have since the actual selection of Dow -Sat of Minnesota to operate your cable system. It is essential that representatives from your City be available to express your City's viewpoint on this important issue. If you have any questions prior to the December meeting, please feel free to contact me. NOTE TO CITY ADMINISTRATORS: Please find enclosed our most recent list of the Directors and Alternates of the Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission. If your director has changed please call my secretary, Jeannine at 343-1231, and inform her as to your current representation on the Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission. Also, if you have not alre done so, please inform this office as to your City's acti,. relative to the proposed budget of the Lake "innetonka Cable Communications Commission for 198. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Thank you for your cooperation in these matters. TDC:jlg OPERATING RULES FOR PUB. , EDUCATIONAL, GOVERNMENTAL, AND LEASED ACCESS CHANNELS T1-. rules and regulations set forth herein below govern the availahlI ity and use of public, ed..cational, governmen:ol, and leased access ch,nnels of DOW-SA'" OF MINNF.SOTA, INC. maintained on its cable televisia,: system Serving the Lake Minnetonka Area in Minnesota. I. PUBLIC ACCESS A. Public: accees channel space shall be available at no charge to any person, group, organization or other entity on a first come, nordiscriminatory basis upon thn filing of the designated Application for Access Channel Time and Use of Facility (Attachment-ALbA2) and consistent With the availability of the access channel at the time and for tl►e ci„r:;- tion requested. Time and production facility requests should be made fni reasonable ho,,r;;. B. No program, production or presentation shall be transmitted which involves ;any advertising material desiR, to promote the sale of commercial products or serv;^eh (in- cluding advertising by or on behalf of candidates for public office,:), lottery inforr ,tion, or obscene or indecent iratter. C. In order to permit diversity of use among pl►blic access cablecasters Dow -Sat of Minnesota, I c. m.:y limit the use of cablecasting facilities by any one applicant to two ho►.rs during any calendar week. Additional time may be leased 4n accordance with numher IV of these rifles. II. EDUCATIONAL ACCESS A. Educational. access channel space shall be available at no c:. to Lake Vin;unka educational institutions upon the filing of designa; ed �pplir.ation fo! '. cess Channel Time and Use of Facility (Attachment Ai o A-2) and consistent with the avail !v of the access channel at the time and Cr the duration requested. B. Same as I. B. IIL. GOVERNMENTAL A� A. Covernmentai .:__ess channel space shall be avail ble at no charge to the ci. Lake ¢_ 4nnka Area and its departments upon the filing of tb- 'naignal.ed Ar 'i -tion ur Acr-.ss Channel Time and Use cf Facility Attachments A� i_A�l he availaLility of the access channel at t0k,- time and for the Use of the government.i access cha: iel shall be governed by the r B. Same as 1. B. IV. LEASED ACCI: A. Leased } :ess cl•an-.el space Ft.+' �,e available to on, -iup, crganization or then entit; or a f i - cots' imt---tory basis upon the filing of the designate Application for Ar-eas .,hanaei Time ind Una of Facility (Attachments A 6 A ) and consfa- tent with Lhe bility of the , seas channel at the time and for duration re- quested. Time requc.she-ild be made for neasonable hou-s. IV. LEASED ACCESS - Cor'. B. No program, pro ction or presentation shall be transmitted which involves lottery information or obscene or indecent matter. C. The rates for use of the leased access channel and production charges are avail- able upon request and stated as approved by the titre, of the Lake Minnetonka Area. V. EQUIPMENT A. Public access equipment (studio, portable, and post -production) is dedicated to the purpose of production and cablecasting of public access programming. Equipment may be borrowed on a first come, nondiscriminatory basis only by individuals who have been certified by Dow -Sat of Minnesota, Inc. or its designee. Equipment certification requirements are included in At�lnehment B. A. Public access equipment a - be rented by individuals for purposes other than indicated in Section VIII A. only when it has not been requested for public access use. C. Applicants requesting to borrow public access equipment must complete and sign the E ui pent RequesL Form, Attachment C. D. Applicants must a;;ree to return the equipment to Dow -Sat in good condition. Normal wear and tear is expected. During the time that the equipment is in the pos- session of the applicant, ►'' applicant shall be wholly responsible for its c—, safe- keeping and custody and any and all damage to the equipment. The applicant shall nit attempt, make or perm'Z anyone else to make or attempt to make alterations to equiF--ent without the expressed authorization of the Chief Engineer of Dow -Sat. E. Dow -Sat may withhold from an individual the use of the public access equipment and facilities if, in the judgement of the access facilitator, the individual cannot adequately exercise the required care, safekeeping rr-ustody of the equipment. F. Production assistance shall be available at narge to users of public, edu- cational and gove--nmental access equipme- C. Video Tat -La - Dow -Sat of Minnest, will provide video tapes free of charge to each access user. All tapes remain thr ..rty of Dow -Sat of Minnesota, Inc. Tapes sre reusable and will be recycled. H. Studio Use - (a) essential personnel only are allowed in ch- conc,.1 rotrm during the production (b) users and participants may not interfere with the productions and studio time of other users (c) users and other participants shall not smoke it the control room due to possible damage to the equipment (d) Dow -Sat of Minnesota, Inc. reserves the right to temporarily refuse the uve of the access channel or iacilities to pe,son under the influence of alcohol, drugs or otherwise not under full control of or her senses (e) v.s will abiy all rules established by the Dow -Sat of Mir a, Inc. ac(eas --ordinator. VI. WAIVER A. Dow -Sat may, in its discretion, waive any of the above requirements in circum- stances for which the nature of the cablecast warrants such a waiver. VI'_. PUBLIC INSPECTION A. Dow -Sat ^;hall maintain a complete record of the names and addresses of all in- dividuals and groups requesting access time, Attachment D. Such records shall be main- tained for a period of two years in the local Public Access Studio of Dow -Sat and wi'1 be available for public inspection, Monday through Friday, except legal holidays. B. Persons requesting public inspection shall identify themselves by name and address in order to assure Dow -Sat administrative control of such records. C. Access channel time will not be made available to access users who refuse to have their identity maintained in the records and available for public inspection as required by this section. VIII. CABLECASTING A. Thete are two ways to provide programming in order to utilize access time. A program may be produced by using Dow -Sat portable or studio equipment, or a prerecorded tape may be supplied to Dow -Sat. In both cases, the tape is then scheduled for showing on the designated access channel. B. Dow -Sat of Minnesota, Inc. reserves the right to review the convent of all tapes and script outlines submitted for cablecesting to ensure compliance with FCC rules, and all other federal, state, and local standards. Tapes produced by community residents are not expected to meet broadcast television standards. However, those tapes which do not maintain a stable video signal will not be cablecast. C. Dow -Sat of Minnesota, Inc. assumes no responsibility for damages to tape, film, or equipment furnished by the user. Furthermore, Dow -Sat will not edit, or a er in any way, the content of access material without the written permission of the user. D. No charge shall be made for non profit use of an access channel. F. Producers who use Dow -Sat equipment and/or facilities may dub one copy of their maste, Late for their own use. The producer must supply his own tape for this purpose. After' the first copy a $10.00 der hok (1 hr. min.) dubbing fee will be assessed. PRODUCTION CHARGES FOR LEASED USERS $10/hour: Portable camera/recorder accessories package $15/hour: Video tape editing facility (2 machines) $30/hour: Studio facility, full or partially -equipped $20/hour: Playback time on community channel $200/day: Mobile production package (includes 2-camera studio format and tape unit - 24 hour) Playback rates will begin on the following schedule: 1-5 minutes, one time spot $3.00 per minute 5-30 minutes, 1 to 12 times $20.00 per run 13 times or over $18.00 per run 52 times $15.00 per run 30 minutes, 1 Lu 26 tithes 26 times or over 52 times Over 52 times $30.00 per run $24.00 per run $1,000.00 package rate Negotiable PRODUCTION CHARGES FOR NON-COMMERCIAL USERS There will be no charges for a public institution's use of the production facilities. There will be no charges for playback of any program produced by a non-commercial user over the access or local origination channel(s). Dow -Sat will furnish videotape to non-commercial users at no charge, if we retain the tape. Copies may be made for minimal charge, depending on number and program length. PRODUCTION CHARGES FOR COMMERCIAL USERS $10/hour: Portable camera/recorder accessories package $15/hour: Videotape editing facility (2 machines) $30/hour: Studio facility, full or partially -equipped $20/hour: Playback time on community channel $200/day: Mohile production package (includes 2-camera studio format and tape unit) (Attachment B) USER ZERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS b RESPONSIBILITF.S 1. Eligible access users include residents of the community and members or employees of organizations which serve the community. Any community resident may request channel time for the presentation of a program. 2. Eligible users wishing to utilize now -Sat of Minnesota, Inc. equipment to produce a program must complete a training course provided by Dow -Sat or have taken a similar course elsewhere and pass an evaluation test given at the conclusion of the course. To pass the evaluation test, the user must demonstrate production capability and familiarity with the production equipment to the satisfaction of the Dow -Sat staff. 3. Upon completion of the training course and evaluation test, the qualified user will be issued an access eligibility card which serves as a verifi- cation of the ability of the user to operate the access equipment and facilities. The card also serves as an acknowledgement on the part of the user of the familiarity with and acceptance of the right and respon- sibilities associated with access use and is surrendered each time equip- ment is checked out. Eligible users are also required to fill out an eligibility information card which is kept on file by Dow -Sat. 4. All access eligibility card holders must produce or participate in the production of at least one program per year. Failure to do so will require the user to retake the certification test. It is the responsibility of the access eligibility card holder to have his eligibility card updated to re- flect production involvement. S. Eligible users under 18 years of age must have a release form signed by a parent or legal guardian stating that the adult accepts full responsibility for the equipment and its use. Studio cameras and editing equipment •.ill be used only under supervision of the access coordinator or adult access user. 6. User must agree that if music or non music copyrighted material is tnvolvei, the appropriate copyright clearances have been obtained. (Attachment B - Page 2) User Certification Requirements 6 Responsibilites - Cont. Page 2 7. Users of portable equipment must agree to take all initiative to iden- tify himself or herself, to persons being -video taped. The user should explain the reason for taping, but not identify himself or herself as an employee or representative of Dow -Sat. 8. Termination of Privileges - Equipment, facility, and channel time use privileges may be terminated at the discretion of Dow -Sat of Minnesota, Inc. for any of the following reasons: a. failure to return equipment on time b. damage of equipment c. failure to notify access coordinator of a cancelation of pre- viously scheduled equipment or facilities. d. violation of any of the operating procedures established by Dow -Sat of Minnesota, Inc. I have read and understand the eligibility requirements, and I agree to abide by them: Local Access User - Signature Parent or Guardian must co-sign if access user is under 18 years of age Uate (Attachment A1) DOW-SAT Of MINNESOTA, INC. REQUEST _vR CHANNEL TIME STAFF USK APPROVED DENIED BY DATE NAME DATE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE HOME PHONE BUSINESS PHONE AEC NO. ORGANIZATION CONTACT PERSON ISSUE DATE PHONE PROGRAM TITLE P.P. NO. (IF APPLICABLE) PROGRAM LENGTH (MINUTES) PROGRAM SYNOPSIS CHANNELS) RKQUESTED DATE(S) TINE TIME TIME APPLICANTS SIGNATURE DATE STAFF USE [APPROVED DENIED REASON CA11L&CAST DATE/TIME (IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE) ACCESS CHANNEL AGREEMENT DATW STAFF SIGNATURE VAT[ ('o t.i( Iwmi)t A.,) DOW-SAT OF MINNESOTA, INC. PROGRAM PROPOSAL STAFF USE 9ylTCM A•PROV D D_ �. /. NO. R Y 1.NAME DATE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE HOME PHONE BUSINESS PHONE AEC NO, ISSUE DATE ORGANIZATION CONTACT PERSON PHONE 2.PROORAM TITLE: 1 EST. LENGTH (MINUTES) FORMAT PROPOSED PRODUCTION DATE LIVE PROPOSED CABLECAST DATE TAPED DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM CONTENT 3.FACILITIES REQUIRED: STUDIO TIME REQUIRED REMOTE TIME REQUIRED PORT -A -PAC TIME REQUIRED EDIT SUITE TIME REQUIRED DO! -SAT CREW VOLUNTEER CREW NUMBER OF PERSONNEL. REQUIRED PURPOSE• APPLICANT 9 •IONATURK DABS 1 DOW-SAT OF MINNES0111 INC. EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES CFIC_k-0UT FOR!' NAMB NOM[ ' '10NL ■Us I NESS PHONE AMC NO, P.P. NO. PAT[ OUT TIME DATE I TIME _! QUAN. CQUI►MENT DESCRIPTION USER INIT, RTAFF COMMENTS o u IN AUT INiT. 'N I 1 I HAVE INSPECTED THE EQUIPVKN'v ANDj7111 FACILITIES U1[R 1 NAME LISTRO ABOVE AND FOUND IT TO Of IN PROPER CONDI " ON FACll`T AZ NOTED. 0 U JBER 1 SIGNATURE _ _ DATE _ T 1 N[ O'IT T IT ♦TArF - Di -~T I VR C'J' _ 1 SIGNATURE �nATR iN TIME IN GTA-r C,MN/'ITS- I S A// 1 SIGNATURE Us�—T 11UNAIURK •TALI "1q'•a TYot vrorl1f /oulporw--av%joN o-o-Y •'f'll•�[NT PILL 60 T''^ROVi1t�� TtgTtO BY 1. •vAIP I tCs1N I C 1 •N w • ♦ 4I N :4 MOV^• T'f r[TR-1v l vc vnqu l tL! D&.4a Sit & No L I A V I L F T T. (Attachment D) ACCESS ELIGIBILITY INFO A . E Issued i i City Stat Pha 0 alL Emp P"H of Emitn Poi SIG. C PooNeese AdfJinss: — H I NO - -foyer 10 rQency Crrrtact Is o0� O E &AW Z a C z V PRODUCTION EXPERIENCE Date P. P. No. T Sionatuti St. Init. Z~ W 0 f- to N Z W CO W W � Z 2 QZa H J � Cr Lf_ w 400 H- f- ►_ H V Y Z Z Z 0 w I p U. �aoo V / > V• i /� V/ CC m W 1 cc 0 X W r- Q a v U WZ WAa0�Z rui H O � cc = p QV 41f Z W Q ZWO ►- V ►- O Q. W S r- N] O W LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMISSION -ALTERNATES Mr. Robert Frizelle 1837� ileathcote Lane Wayzata, MN 5'391 Mr. Jim Olds '00 LakF Street Excelsior, MN 55331 Mr. Keith Stuessi 5000 Meadville Street Excelsior, MN 55331 Ms. Betsy Swartwood 210 Russell Lane Long Lake, MN 55356 Ms. Sarah Lutz 4645 Brockton Lane Hamel, MN 55340 Mr. Brian Borne 2633 Woodbridge Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Mr. Harrold Pellets 1450 Game Farm Road Mound, MN 55364 Mr. Robert L. Gagne 24850 Amlee Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Mr. Ronald Kraemer 3910 De Otero Avenue Spring Park, MN 55384 Ms. Ellen PeterEon 2500 Sprit Knob Road Wa°, ata, MN 55391 LAKE MINNETONKA CITIZEN REP Carl Rosen 4540 West Arm Road Spring Park, MN 55384 LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMISSION MEMBERS MAILING LIST- :.OU'NCIL MEMBERS Mr. Charles Watson 19150 Easton Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Mr. Richard Knapp 128 Third Street Excelsior, ON �6331 Mr. James Hillis 5480 Maple Heights Excelsior, MN 55331 Ms. Robin Hoseth !kside Drive -ke, MN 55356 -,mas Anderson 34.1 .,iel Road Hamel, MN 55340 Mr. Danni O'Reilly 2552 Lafayette Rood Wayzata, MN 55391 Mr. Frank deMonchaux 5820 Lakeview Drive Mound, MN 55364 Ms. Mary C. Butler 3145 Casco Circle 'e4ayzata. MN 55391 Ms. Wlaine _�n 8933 Wildwo Avenue St. Bonifaciv , MN 55375 Ms. -Jan Haugen 4780 Lake-* r 'Terrace Shorewood ',,N 55331 Mrs. Ellie He'_1F 1801 Sunset Ur: SFr,-q Park, M.. 55384 Mr. Fdward Bauman 90 To••ka �,1 Road Torka Bay, MN —111 Ms. Andrea Bassett 2850 Stony Arch Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Mr. David awinghamer 5429 Zumbra Circle Excelsior, MN 55331 LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMISSION -RESIDENTS Mr. Dennis Haggerty 19105 Lake Avenue Wayzata, MN 55391 Mr. David Stahr 142 First Street Excelsior, MN 55331 Mr. Doug Hanson 283 Heather Lane Long Lake, MN 55356 Mr. Larry Boisclair 1825 Co. Rd.24 Long Lake, MN 55356 Mr. Reid Baker 2417 Woodbridge Wayzata, MN 55391 Mr. William Goblirsch 940 Maple Crest Drive Mound, MN 55364 Mr. Walter R. Benson Orono City Hall Crystal Bav, MN 55323 Ms. Eleanor Dittrich 8870 Hilltop Dr. St. Bonifacius, MN 55375 Mr. Al Leonardo 5845 Country Club Rd. Shorewood, MN 55331 Mr. Dennis Erickson P.O. Box 1 Spring Park, MCd 55384 Mr. Anthony Pini 125 Wildhurst Road Tonka Bay, MN 553.3i Mr. Allan Erickson 2825 Maplewocd Czrcle I... Wayzata, MN 5539: 'Frans 9(:errm3 "!' _ 3 3 1 COUNCIL MEETING MAYOR Robert Rescou ULC 1 U iQ-COUNCIL Jan Haugen Tod Shaw Kristi Stover CITY OF ORONO Robert Gogne CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 • (612) 474 321 FOR YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION TO: Administrators, Clerks, and Cite Councils FROM: Jan Haugen, Chair of Minnetonka Cable Commission SUBJECT: Comm, ion Members from Your City CITY OF ORONO When the Commission was formed each City was guaranteed 2 seats. The Representatives you appointed were very active during the writing of the RFP, the evaluation of the companies that responded, and the choosing of the Cable Company that would build our Cable system. No-, it seems, everyone has the idea that the work of the Commission is cve r NDT TRUE' - As Commission we must now select a Cable Administrator, monitor the systcln to make sure the residents of our respective cities receive the service that was promised, and regulate the access channels. You must appoint 2 Commissioners and 1 alterrate. A Council Member must be one of the three appointed. They should be dedicated to the premise of a first rate Cable system for the residents of our cities and willing to attend at least 1 meeting a quarter, and possibly one meeting a month, for transacting the business of the Cable Commission. If you reappoint those who were previously on the Commission stress the aforementioned points and make sure they understand the necessity of your City being fully represented on the Commission. We would like to restructure the Commission so it is imps-rativt• that each City is represented so they can express the views and wishes of the Citv. if you are planning to reappoint the previous members please send their name, correct address, city, and a phone number where they (an be reached , during the day, (this will only be used when absolutely necessary). We would also like the home phone number. A Residential Community on (ake M;nnetonka's South Shore Cable Commission Members From: Jan Haugen page two Perhaps you will be appointing new members in January. We would appreciate the new member's name, address, etc. as soon as possible after their appointment so we can update our mailing list and thus make sure they re-eive meeting notices, irformation on Cable, etc. Thank you for your attention to this letter. Jan Haugen Chair, Minnetonka Cable Commission 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, Minn. 55331 M rz.3 TO: City Council FROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director COUNCIL MEETING DEC 10 16-' DATE: December 4, 1984 CITY OF ORONO SUBJECT: Liquor Store Operating Results - Three Months Ended September 30, 1984 Comparative liquor store operating statements for the third quarter of 1984 and 1983 are attached. The balance sheet and statement of revenue and expenses are somewhat condensed from prior reports but are essentially unchanged. The cost of sales statements has been expanded to show cost of sales by type, liquor, wine, beer, and mix and miscellaneous. The 1984 totals for liquor -wine and beer -mix are shown so that a comparison can be made with 1983. The more detailed information is not readily available fur 1983 so this method must be us.d until the first quarter of 1985. A sepiarate schedule is included for gross profit on sales by category - liquor, wine, beer, and mix and misce)laneious. As with the cost of sales, the gross profit statement compares the 1984-83 totals for liquor -wine, and beer - mix due to information limitations. A condensed comparative statement of revenues and exp�?nses is presented below. THIRD QCARTtR f4�7' bvei __ TZAR TO DATE _ __ � Over 1994 _ 1987 (Under 1987 198� 1983 _(Under) 1983 sales ^.c: of d s arts $115,]94 $177,713 S(22,7191 $314,879 $327,658 233 243 5(12,979) Cost of Sales 8.�2 t7�89� 97,893 (14,394) —�( 22�,964 89,91S 94,565 _1e,3291 t4,6581 Gross prifit opecatirg expenses )2,605 28,500 —7,1�5 49,650 _ 26,569 ,Y151 l6a) 86,728 3.1yl 83 668 8,985 3,060 (7 �) opersti^g ncome (Loss) Non operating income 972 �.a" 1,654 () (6( 82) 3 3 1155 (621) 3V Net Income (Loss) 5 1,� S 1e,fi:s ........ ........ ......... ........ ..... ......... The third quarter of 1984 had income of $5,07'1 compared to the second quarter income of $4,390. This is an increase of $687 or 15.6% between the second and third quarters. For the first nine months of 1984, however, the liquor operation had income of $5,721 on sales of $314,879, compared to 1983 nine month income of. $14,0b9 on sales of $327,858. For the first nine months of 1984 the income was down $8,339 or 59.3% For the fourth quarter of 1983 the liquor store showed net income of $7,143 on sales of $118,423. Sales for October, 1984 were down $4,122 from 1983, as shown on memo #84-71. As stated previously it will not be possible to transfer from the Liquor Operating Fund to the General Fund the $30,000 budgeted for 1984. At the end of 1984 we will transfer $15,000 and if possible, will transfer the other $15,000 in 1985. Memo ::84-74 The annual liquor store profits have been steadily decreasing since 1972 and the liquor store manager has been trying Lo generate additional sales and cut overhead in several ways. It seems that the decline in sales is not unique to Orono but is widespread. The Minnesota Municipal Liquor Association (MMLA) has a consulting service available to us for analyzing the situation as it exists in Orono and r-commending a course of action. This service is available to us at no charge because we are a member of MMLA. It is requested that Council direct the liquor manager to retain the MMLA consulting service as soon as possible. M84.74(' CITY OF ORONO hUN IC I PAL LIQUOR STORE: BALANCE SHEEP ASSETS Current Assets: Cash and investments Returned checks and credit card charges Accounts receivable Accrued interest receivable Prepaid expenses Inventory for resale Total Current Assests Property and Equipment: LPashold improvements Equipment Less accumulated depreciation Net Property and Equipment Total Assets LIABILITIES AM) FUND EQUITY Liabilities: Accrued 'Rages payable Accrued retirement payable Accrued credit card expense Accounts payable Due to State (Sales Tax) Total Liabilities Fund Equity: Retained earnings January 1 Net income January 1 to September 30 Transfers to General Fund Total Fund Equity Total Liabilities and Fund Equity SEPTEMBER 30, 1984 $ 35,247 853 243 1,428 535 106,909 725 25,763 26,488 (20,786) $ 1,283 335 107 5,573 2,603 135,295 5,721 $145,215 5,702 $150,917 S 9,901 141,016 $150,917 SEPTEMBER 30, 1983 $ 65,043 441 143 1,908 1,846 95,862 725 25,663 26,388 (19,357) $ 1,002 392 143 9,440 3,146 144,091 14,060 $165,243 7,031 $172,274 ==-sssax $ 14,123 158,151 $172,274 M84.74F CITY OF ORONO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE STATEMENT OF REVENUE AND EXPENSES Three Months Ended Se t 30 Nine Months Ended Sept 30 1 - FT - If Amount I Sales Amount I Sa.s Amount I Sa es Amount Sales_ Sales and Cost of Sales: Sales $116,936 108.08 $139,629 100.00 $319,644 109.00 $332,699 100.00 Sales discounts 1.54I 1.32 1 077 1.34 4 765 1.49 4 841 1.V, Net sales 115,191 -4i'. '137:743 314!79 327r858 Cost of sales 82,789 70.89 97 993 69.54 224 964 70.38 233 293 70.12 Gross Profit "2,605 -27.88 48!630 -Tvy $-09!913 -a-m 5 94!565 -A- Operating Expenses: Salaries and wages 16,833 14.39 15,798 11.31 49,471 15.47 46,526 13.98 Retirement contributions 1,456 1.25 1,475 1.06 41824 1.51 4,362 1.31 Health & life insurance 1,175 1.09 1,947 .75 3,495 1.99 3,269 Workers comp insurance 116 .10 119 .10 354 .11 376 .98 Professional services 512 .44 36 .92 1,600 .59 526 .11 Operating and saint supplies 132 .11 326 .23 1,112 .35 1,255 .16 Heat, light and power 1,863 .91 1,351 .97 3,354 1.05 3,627 .3R 1.99 Depreciation 438 .37 136 .19 1,293 .49 400 Rent, building 3,759 1.21 3,600 2.SR 11,150 3.49 10,80G .12 3.25 Maintenance and repairs 488 .42 297 .15 1,433 .45 768 Admin. charge from Gen. Fund 627 .54 601 .43 1,881 .59 1,803 .24 Communications 184 .s6 133 .10 56f .18 453 .54 Office supplies 15 .01 128 .09 157 .05 239 .13 Printing, publishing & advertising 433 .37 393 .22 1,152 .36 825 .07 Data processing 425 .16 449 .31 1,259 .39 1,436 .25 Insurances 418 .36 1,576 1.13 2,297 .72 4,909 .43 1.47 Other expense 435 .37 1,266 .91 1.340 .42 2,192 .63 Total Operating Expense -fVT ` 2§, 61 -FU11 -U f20 1T;1j 83,660 25.14 Operating IncomL (Loss) 4,105 3.51 12,999 8.66 3,187 1.98 19,905 3.28 Mon Operating Revenue: Interest on invest-ments 964 .82 1,169 .83 2,491 .78 2,499 Other Total Non Operating Revenue 0 --4TI 81 --gj 491 -'T�j 35 -T� 43 -�-�t 01 --�q 665 .75 20 ---9 Net Income (Loss) 0 S,077 ........ 4.3411 ....... 3 13,744 ........ 9.841 ....... 3 5.721 ........ 1.79% ....... $ 14,969 ........ 4.231 ....... M84.74D Liquor Sales Cost of Sales Gross Profit Gross Profit % Wine Sales Cost of Saies Gross Profit Gross Profit % Total Liquor and Wine CITY OF ORONO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR SPORE GNIDSS PROFIT ON SALES Three Months Ended Sept 30 Nine Months Endd Sept 30 1984 19821984 1983 $ 40,747 29, 5 :'? 11,175 27.43% $ 25,916 16,762 $ 9,154 35.32% $110,945 80,497 $ 30,448 2!.44% $ 75,413 48,935 $ 26,478 35,11% Sales $ 66,663 $ <<,,624 $186,35E $191,232 Cost of Sales 46,334 53,063 129,432 133,134 Gross Profit 20,329 23,561 $ 56,926 $ 58,098 Gross Profit % 30.50% 30.75% 30.55% 30.38% Beer Sales $ 46,470 $124,048 Cost of Sales 33,540 88,689 Gross Profit $ 12,930 $ 35,:•59 Gross Profit % 27.82% 28.50% Mix and Miscellaneous Sales � $ 3,803 $ 9,238 Cost of Sales 2,915 6,843 Gross Profit 888 ,395 Gross Profit % 23.35% 25.93% Total Beer, Mix and Miscellaneous Sales $ 50, 2,71 $ f , 99t, $133,286 $141,467 Cost of Sales 44,030 95,532 Groc,s P-ofit _-61,455 $ !3,818 $ 18,966 $ 37,754 _100,159 $ 41,398 Gross Profit % 27.49% 30.11% 28.33% 29.20 % CITY OF ORONO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE COST OF SALES Three Months Ended Sept 30 Nine Months Ended Sept 30 1984 1983 1984 1983 Liquor Inventory, Beginning $ 50,608 $ 52,886 Purchases _ 28,412 77,059 79,020 129,945 Less Inventory, Ending 49,448 49,448 Cost of Sales $ 29,572 $ 80,497 Wine Inventory, Beginning $ C11010 $ 54,942 Purchases .4,561 45,802 �68,571 100,744 Less Inventory, Ending 51,809 _ 51,809 Cost of Sales $ 16,762 $ 48,935 Total Liquor and Wine Inventory, Beginning $104,618 $103,892 $107,828 $102,614 Purchases 42,973 38,480 122,861 119,829 147,591 142,372 230,689 222,443 Less Inventory, Ending 101,257 89,309 101,257 89,309 Cost of Sales $ 46,334 53,063 $129,432 $133,134 Beer Inventory, Beginning $ 4,916 $ 4,667 Purchases 32,288 87,686 37,204 92,393 Less Inventory, Ending 3,664 3,664 Cost of Sales $ 33,540 $ 88,689 Mix and Miscellaneous Inventory, Beginning $ 2,209 $ 1,960 Purchases 2,694 7,031 4,903 8,99). Less Inventory, Ending 1,988 1,988 Cost of Sales $ 2,915 $ 7,003 Total Beer, Mix and Miscellaneous Inventory, Beginning $ 7,125 $ 10,313 $ 6,627 $ 6,797 Purchases _34,982 40,270 94,717 99,915 42,107 50,583 101,344 106,712 Bess Inventory, Finding 5,652 6,553 5,652 6,553 Cost of Salts $ 36,455 $ 44,030 95,692 $100,159 Analysis of city liquor store operations for 1983 Arne H. Carlson, State Auditor Declining sales and net income con- tinued in 1983, as evident in the sum- mary analysis of city liquor store oper- ations. In the 343 cities which operated liquor stores, 60 stores suffered oper- ating liquor losses, while 31 stores had net losses. In contrast, 22 stores con- tributed $100,000 or more to the city general fund, which indicates the sharp contrasts in profit among the stores. Four stores closed during the year. City liquor store sales decreased $833,000 to $138.5 million in 1983, compared to $139.3 million in 1982, and $146.1 million in 1981. Gross profit for all stores of 31.5 percent was up 0.1 percent over the prior year. Oper- ating expense continued rising to 25.7 percent, up from 25.2 percent in 1982. Operating income of $8.0 million was down from $8.6 million 1982 and $10.6 million in 1981. Net income of all stores totaled $10.854,071, down from $11,408,184 a year earlier. Contribution of city liquor store profits to other city funds was down also in 1983, amounting to $8,884,704 compared to $9.079,436 for 1982. Twenty-seven city liquor stores had gross sales in 1983 in excess of $1 million, and two, Edina and Richfield, had sales of $5.48 an' $5.46 million, respec- tively. The most profitable city liquor store was Richfield with an operating income of $463,623, followed by St. Antlumy, Bemidji, and Edina. Twen'y- six stores had net incomes of over $100,000 in 1983. as compared to 24 stores in 1982. Net income for all stores ($10.854,071) was an average of TA percent of sales, compared to 8 2 per cent in 1982 and 9.6 percent in 1981 Ninety-eight stores made no contra butions to other municipal funds in 1983 and nine required contributions from governmental funds Two stores. Longv& aril Watson. faik•d to rvix,rt in time for this artick, Summary of 1983 city liquor stores operations On and off -sale stores - 248 cities Percent of sales Item Amount 1993 1982 Sales $75.932.166 100.0 100.0 Cost of sales 46,234.036 61.0 61.9 Gross profit 29.598,130 39.0 38.1 Operating expense 25.392,613 33.5 32.3 Income from operations 4,205.517 5.5 5.8 Non-cr-rating revenues 2,157,561 2.8 2.8 Non -operating expenses 353.990 0.4 0.4 Net income before transfers 6,009.088 7.9 8.2 Transfers to other city funds 4,573.410 - Off -sale onl%, stores - 95 cities Percent of sales Item Amount 1993 1982 Sales $62.625.435 100.0 100.0 Cost of sales 48.588.811 77.6 77.7 Gross profit 14,036.624 22.4 22.3 Operating expense 10,194.221 16.3 15.6 Income from operations 3.842,403 6.1 6.7 Non -operating revenues 1,212,146 1.9 1.8 Non -operating expenses 209.566 0.3 0.3 Net income before transfers 4,844,993 7.7 R 2 Transfers to other city hinds 4.311.294 .all stores - 343 cities Percent of sales Item Amount 19143 1982 Saks $138,457,601 100.0 100.0 Cost of sales 94,822.947 68.5 68.6 Gross profit 43,04.754 31.5 3) 4 Operating expense 35,586.834 25 " 25.2 Income from operations 8,047,920 5.8 6.2 Nor, -operating revenues 3,369.707 24 2.3 Non -operating expenses 563.5% 0.4 0.3 Net income before transfers 10,854.071 7 8 8.2 Transfers to other city funds A.884.IN - - Operating income as a percent of sales Percent of sales Item 1983 1982 1481 On and off-sak stores .5.5 K Off sale nnly stores 6-1 h t All stores 58 r, 2 - December 19#44 COUNCIL MEETING DEC 10 1984 TO: Orono Council CITY OF ORONO FROM: Joan Lattin, Assistant: Finance ')irector DATE: December 7, 1984 SUBJECT: 1985 Salary Resolution The 1985 Salary Resolution reflects a 4% increase as per the salary benchmark used for the 1985 Qudget. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUi'ION ESTABLISHING SALARIES FOR CITY EMP[D'YEFS FOR 1985 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, that salaries and wages for City employees be established as follows, effective January 1, 1984: NAME POSITION 1984 SALARY 1985 SALARY Walter R. Benson City Administrator $43,874.46 $ Dorothy Hallin City Clerk 20,437.03 21,254.52 Thomas Kuehn Treas/Finance Director 32,117.95 33,402.67 Joanne Lattin Deputy Treasurer 20,437.03 21,254.52 Cha:_iotte Knutson Acc. Clerk/Posting Clerk 17,305.60 17,997.63 Jeanne Mabusth Zoning Administrator 30,540.59 31,162.21 Thomas Jacobs Building Official 24,142.56 John Gerhardso:) Publif7 Works Coordinator 34,166.75 35,533.42 Jack brinkhau,.; Street Foreman 27,202.65 28,290.76 Steve Hansen Street Dept. LBO 21,527.09 22,388.17 John Sass Street Dept. LED 21,527.09 22,388.17 Dale Skreen Street Dept. LDO 21,527.09 22,388.17 James Gregory Street Dept. HEO 23,977.34 24,936.43 Frank Mross Senior Maintenance Man 18,526.79 19,267.86 Jerome Smith Sew*-,r i dater 22,754.5', 23,664.71 Wayne Quast Sewer i Water 22,735.44 23,644.86 William Carlson Utility Foreman 26,952.63 28,030.74 Theresa N:.ab 15,142.40 (to be review d Mel Kilbo Police Chief 36,770.39 38,241.21 Winton Burmaster Asst. Chief of Police 29,735.80 30,925.23 Sue Bobzien Police Secretary 16,286.40 16,937.86 Barbara Provo Copy & File Clerk 4.25 per hr 4.42 per hr Ronald Steftenhagen Golf Course Supt. 24,076.14 25,039.19 Lorraine McGowan Liquor Store Manager 26,287.67 27,339.18 Patricia Higus Asst. Liquor Store Manager 14,576.43 15,159.49 Dian Ehrenberg Liquor Store Clerk 12,501.22 13,001.27 Michael Gaffron Asst. Zoning Administrator 25,116.00 26,120.64 Pam Sutton Recorder 7.50 per hr 7.80 per hr Gary Cheswick Sergeant 28,410.48 29,546.90 3/4/85) City of ORONO RE;,OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. PART TIME POSITIONS WIE POSITION 1984 SALARY 1985 SALARY Carol Hansing Asst. Police :secretary 6.24 per hr 6.49 per hr Ccnnie Nanuel Ligour Store Cl�-k 4.65 per hr 4.84 per hr John Henning Liquor St -,,,re '-Ierk 4.35 per hr 4.52 per hr Lyle Oman Field Inspector 15,600.00 16,224.0.1 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that mileage for City use of private cars on City business he reimbursed at $0.23 per mile. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held December 10, 1984. ATTEST: Dorothy M. 1a n, City Clerk ry C. Butler, Mayor IL COUNCIL MEETING U E C 10 1984 TO: Orono Council CITY OF ORONO FROM: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator DATE: December 7, 1984 SUBJECT: Special Meeting January 3, 1985 - Appointments Each year it is necessary to appoint or reappoint commission members, consultants, legal newspaper etc. It has been recommended that we conduct a special council meeting January 3, 1985. KEY 7:OG PM Council Mt 2nd 6 4th 1985 ORONO CITY MEETING SCHEDULE g Q Mo ay 7:30 PM Planning Commission U 3rd Mon. JANUARY FEUXUAKT T w T F S S M T W T F S X rL:.a 3 4 5 1 2 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 49 6 7 8 9 :30 15 16 17 18 19 10 CD 12 13 14 15 16 G22 23 24 25 26 17 19 20 21 22 23 27 a 25 30 31 240 26 27 28 MAY S M, T w T F S 1 2 3 4 6 l 8 9 10 11 ;: I3 14 15 16 17 18 10 21 22 23 24 2LI 28 29 30 31 I F S ti 0 7 i1 12 13 14 18 19 20 21 =:5 26 2 7 28 JUNE S M T w T F S 1 2 3 Q 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 OCTOBER S 41 T w T 1 2 3 6 a 8 9 10 13 15 16 17 20 21 22 23 24 2 7 Z 3 29 30 31 F S 4 5 11 12 18 19 25 26 KE :' Q Park Commission Official Holiday x 1st Tues MARCH APRIL S M T w T F S S M T w T F 1 2 1 © 3 4 3 3 4 © 6 7 8 9 7 a8 9 10 11 12 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 17 18 19 17 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 25 26 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 29 30 31 JULY AUGUST S M T w T F S S M T W T 1 3 ` 6 1 2 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 & 7 8 9 14 15 16 16 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 21 ED 23 24 25 26 27 i8 19 20 21 22 23 28 29 30 31 25 0 27 28 29 30 NOVEMBER DECEMBER S M T w T F S S M T W T 1 2 1 2 Q 4 5 6 3 4 Q 6 7 8 9 8 Q 10 11 12 13 10 12 13 14 15 16 15 1® 17 18 19 20 17 18 19 20 21 22 2322 23 24 )< 26 27 24 Z5 26 27 x 29 30 29 30 31 G9 d COUNCIL MEETING TO: Council DEC 10 1984 FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator CITY OF URONO DATE: December 4, 1984 SUBJECT: Schedule for Councilmembers Attendance at Planning Commission Meetings for 1985 The following is a schedule of assigned attendance for the Councilmembers to attend the Planning Commission meetings for the year 1985: January 21, 1985 - Jim Grabek February 19, 1985 - Lynn Adams (NOTE: MEETING IS TUESDAY) March 18, 1985 - Tom Frahm April 15, 1985 - Tim Adams May 20, 1985 - Mayor Butler June 17, 1985 - Jim Grabek July 15, 1985 - Lynn Adams August 19, 1985 - Tom Frahm September 16, 1985 - Tim Adams October 21, 1985 - Mayor Butler November 18, 1985 - Jim Grabek December 16, 1985 - Lynn Adams Please advise the Building and Zoning Department (473-7357) if you cannot attend the meeting assigned to you. Memo #84-71 page 1 of 2 TO: City Council FROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director COUNCIL MEETING DIC 10 19�1� Lorraine McGowan, Liquor Store Manager CITY OF ORONO DATE: November 27, 1984 SUBJECT: Monthly Liquor Store Operating Report - Octol;e: 1984 Attached is the monthly report for the October liquor store operations of 1982, 1983 and 1984. SaleF- for the major categories of liquor, wine and beer are shown Each category is divided by the number of sales to arrive at an average sale price. The total monthly sales includes the mix and miscellaneous sai4s as well as liquor, beer, and wine sales. The total gross sales is divided by the total customer count for the month to show an average sale per customer. Sales discounts -jre deducted from total gross sales to arrive at net sales. To arrive at an estimated oross profit and net profit per month we have taken a five year average percentage for the fourth quarter of 1979 through 1983 and appl ied this to October of the current year quarter. The actual pErcentages are used for the prior two years. Although using this procedure will not be completely accurate it does give a general comparison F tle current month to the same month for the past two years. The attached monthly report reflects 1983 as the high sales overall. Net sales for October 1984, are down $4,122 (11 from 1983, and down $3,570 (10.5%) from 1982. MefT10 # 84 -11 page 2 of 2 MONTHLY LIQUOR STORE OPERATING REPORT 1982 1983 1984 OCTOBER Liquor Sales $12,937 $14,207 $11,859 Sales Count 1,656 1,892 1,568 Avg Sale Price $ 7.81 $ 7.51 $ 7.57 Wine Sales $ 8,927 $ 7,765 $ 8,238 Sales Count 1,645 1,546 1,516 Avg Sale Price $ 5.43 $ 5.02 $ 5.44 Beer Sales $11,772 $12,094 $10,196 Sales Count 2,682 2,614 21270 Avg Sale Price $ 4.39 $ 4.63 $ 4.50 Total Gross Sales $34,436 $34,895 $30,864 Total Customer Count 4,289 4,252 3,708 Avg Sale Per Customer $ 8.03 $ 8.21 $ 8.33 Net Sales $33,943 $34,495 $30,373 Gross Profit % .3023 .2995 .3077 Gross Profit $10,261 $10,331 $ 9,346 Monthly Expense .2402 .2439 .2199 Monthly Expense $ 8,153 $ 8,413 $ 6,679 Net Profit $ 2,108 ------- ------- $ 1,918 ------- ------- $ 2,667 ------- ------- Net Profit % on Sales .0621 ----- ----- .0556 ----- ----- .0878 ----- ----- COUNCIL MEETING Memo #84-72 Page 1 of 4 Utt, 1 TO: City Council CITY OF ORONC FROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director DATE: November 30, 1984 SUBJECT: Year to Date Estimated Revenues Compared to Actual Revenues as of September 30, 1984 The following tabulation shows the estimated 1984 revenues compared to the actual revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 1984, and indicates the percentage of collection. 12 Month 9 Month Estimated Actual Percent of Revenue Revenue Est. Revenue GENERAL. FUND -- Property Taxes Current Ad Valorem -Real Estate $ 857,250 S 387,313 Current Ad Valorem-Pers. Property 11,353 5,677 Delinq. Ad Valorem-R.E. & Pers. Property 34,850 Mobil Homes Tax Fiscal Disparities 17,463 8,732 Penalties 6 Interest 8,232 Forfeited Tax Sales Apportionment 3,335 Total Taxes 886,066 448,139 51% Licenses and Permits :3usiness 7,200 6,418 89 Non -Business 28,800 74,008 257 Total Licenses & Permits 36,000 80,516 22.4 Assessments 2,350 - - - - Intergcvernmenta1 Civil Defense ,000 6,535 Local Government Aid 151,640 77,938 Homestead Credit 135,360 68,261 Reduced Assessment Credit - - Police Town Aid 34,970 - - Municipal State Aid - Streets 24,500 25,740 Payments In Lieu of Taxes 2,000 2,180 Total Intergovernmental 352,470 180,654 51 Memo #84-72 Page 2 of 4 12 Month 9 Month Estimated Actual Percent of Revenue Revenue Est. Revenue GENERAL FUND Charges for Services General Service Fees $ 2,500 $ 3,72.4 149% Plan Check/Site Examiniation Fees 10,000 26,527 265 Conditional Use, Variance, Sub - Division Fees 6,000 11,459 191 Developers Improvement Fees - - 5,246 - - On -Site Septic Inspection Fees 19,500 16,220 83 Contract Police Services 350,099 263,165 75 Contract Inspection Services 2,`00 2,584 103 Police Special Services - - 100 - - False Alarm Fees 1,000 1,400 .140 Admin Charges to Other Funds - - 4,057 - - Other 2 Total Charges for Services 391,599 334,484 85 Fines and Forfeitures Court Fines $ 19,738 26,062 132 Dog Impound Fees 500 950 190 Total Fines and Forfeitures 20,238 27,012 134 ''iscellaneous Interest on Investments 80,000 58,871 74 Rent Income 3,600 3,600 101) Refunds and Reimbursements 3,607 SAC Charges & Permit Surcharges 42,735 Miscellaneous 1,905 Transfers In 53,150 - - Sale of Land 100,000 Total Miscellaneous 136,750 210,718 154 :vine Month Total (1984) $1,825,473 $1,281,523 70% Nine Month Total (1983) $1,671,911 $1,050,253 63% WATER OPERATING FUND Water Sales and Services $ $ 101,508 Interest on Investments (651) Other 39 Nine Month Total (1984) $ 126,129 $ 100,896 80% Nine Month Total (1983) $ 1.21,731 $ 80,492 66* Memo #84-72 Page 3 of 4 12 Month 9 Month Estimated Actual Percent of Revenue Est.Revenue SEWER OPERATING FUNDRevenue -- Sewer Use Charges $ $ 222,929 Penalties on Delinquent Utilities 7,273 Unit Charges 1,575 Interest on Investments 9,720 Interest on Interfund Loans Miscellaneous 33 Metro Waste Control Commission - Interest on Current Value Credits and Deferred Charges 14,777 - Current Portion of Deferred Gain 7,1.48 Nine Month Total (1984) $ 318,266 $ 263,455 83% Nine Month ^otal (1983) $ 283,806 $ 252,032 89% GOLF COURSE OPERATING FUIJD Sales Green Fees $ $ 51,516 Rentals 13,478 Candy, Food, Beverages 7,678 Golf Balls 2,771 Pro Shop 805 Interest on Investments 81.6 Refunds 6 Reimbursements 30 Cash Over (Short) _ (43) Mine Month Total (1984) $ 68,501 $ 77,051 - Nine Month Total (19831 $ 68,882 $ 112,237 - - Memo #84-72 Page 4 of 4 12 Month 9 Month Estimated Actual Revenue Revenue. LIQUOR OPERATING FUND Liquor Sales $ $ 110,945 Wine Sales 75,413 Beer Sales 124,123 Mix Sales 8,214 Misc. Sales 1,024 Sales Discounts (4,766) Bottle Deposits 5,159 Bottle Returns (5,235) Cash Over (Short) 11 Interest on Investments 1,626 Refunds & Reimbursements 30 Percent r)f Nine Month Total (1984) $ 121,016 $ 316,544 - - Nine Month Total (1983) $ 123,237 $ 330,901 - - NOTES - The Liquor Operating Fund and Golf Course Operating Fund revenues reflect gross sales and have not been adjusted for inventory changes to reflect gross profit on sales. No percentages are shown for these operations because the estimated revenues represent gross profit at the projected break-even point. The Golf Course Operatinq Fund in 1983 included a one time transfer of $40,000 from the Park Fund for prior years capital outlay. The Liquor Operating Fund revenue for 1983 has been restated to omit the sales tax collected - a non revenue item. TO: City Council FROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director DATE: November 30, 1984 Memo #84-73 COUNCIL MEETING Page 1 of 3 DEC 1-0 1984 CITY OF ORONO SUBJECT: Year -to -Date Budget Appropriation Compared with Actual Expenditures as of September 30, 1984 Attached is a copy of the September 30, 1984, budget and expenditure report for the General rums and the Liquor, Water, Sewer, and Golf Course Operating Funds. This report reflects the current (c) activity and year-to-date (y) activity by department within the General Fund and by fund for each of the operating funds. The following tabulation is a summary comparison of the nine months ended September 30, 1984, to 1983 for the respective budgets and expenditures of each year. Each year also indicates the percentage of budget expended. 9 Month 12 Month Actual percent General Fund Appropriation Expenditure Expended City Council 1984 $ 44,240 $ 49,279 ill% 1983 48,969 29,067 66 Administration 1984 108,262 77,783 72 1983 102,154 83,592 82 Elections 1984 17,052 6,846 40 1983 3,019 2,391 79 Assessing 1984 53,636 49,741 93 1983 39,786 37,232 94 Finance 1984 87,628 65,567 75 1983 82,360 58,790 71 12 Month General Fund ADDroariation Legal 1984 $ 69,000 1983 64,900 Government Bldgs. 1984 38,266 1983 34,964 Human Rights 1984 4,504 1983 3,690 Police 1984 646,253 1983 585,505 Fire 1984 112,526 1983 105,822 Planning & Zoning 1984 145,140 1983 136,312 Civil Defense 1984 1,865 1983 1,825 Animal Control 1984 7,650 1983 6,976 Engineering 1984 5,420 1983 6,920 Street 1984 361,513 1983 332,141 Health 1984 3,775 1983 3,570 Parks & Recreation 1984 41,139 1983 42,998 Other 1984 -0- 1983 •0- Contingency/ Transfers 1984 77,604 1983 70,000 Total Gen. Fund 1984 1,825,473 1983 1,671,911 Liquor Operating 1984 121,016 1983 123,237 Memo 494-73 Page 2 of 3 9 Month Actual Expenditure $ 22,879 35,087 21,375 21,846 3,531 2,765 449,496 437,083 112,768 99,317 106,818 99,050 960 1,270 3,096 3,144 644 583 209,743 201,908 29,507 24,790 42,138 18,460 19,295 6,678 1,271,466 1,163,053 83,712 82,250 Percent Expended 33% 54 56 63 78 76 70 75 100 94 74 73 52 70 41 45 12 8 58 61 72 58 -- (Note 1) -- (Note 1) 25 10 70 70 69 (Note 2) 67 (Note 2) 12 Month General Fund Appropriation Water Operatingl984 $126,129 1983 121,731 Sewer Operating 1984 318,266 1983 283,806 Golf Course Memo #84-73 Page 3 of 3 9 Month Actual Expenditure $79,028 66,677 224,377 214,705 Percent Expended 63% (Note 2) 55 (Note 2) 71 (Note 2) 76 (Note 2) Operating 1984 68,501 53,655 78 (Note 2) 1983 68,882 46,959 68 (Note 2) NOTE 1 - Includes non -budgeted disbursements for expenses rebillable to developers, SAC charges and building permit fees remitted and misc. refunds and reimbursements. NOTE 2 - Expenditures do not include inventory purchased for resale, sales tax remitted, or depreciation. 1VE4 CIIY,OF 'ACNJ (OPTION !`71 CIYISIOA OFERATIir STSTiMcNT•eY OP,J:C1 AS OF 9-30-i4 P&G[ 1 4 L1 4EKA-L F61►L OIV 11 CITY COUNCIL (eJECT UESCRIPTICN APoROPPIATIrN ENCUMBRANCE EA=ENCITURF PRIOR r0. AOJ UAfNCUM PAL PCT MRS PLAN MR= USED r 4101, SALAFIE;-R[GLLAk EMPLOYEE C 1.194.,_r -------- -- 50.0 Y 1302!C.C: i•93l./2 3.293.2! 75.1 450.0 4153 NORKPANS C(RF IN:rUhAhC. C _ --'---_--•�- • Y Vo.cr 144.46 tJs.SA 51.6 �y� ----- •••• ICTAL FFPSk;hAL 3LRY:CL+ C t,la4. ? ------------ - 50.0 Y 139510.G: t0,�A1.1 3,423.12 74,6 45C.0 421U CFF:CE SU►PLItE C t 75.00 24.5` :C.SJ 32.7 "440 BOOKS i PE0100ICALS C � t 1'►7.0;. 17S.f.0 ! ���• T07K iUPPL1EMMAI10SPEP41 C _ 14.50 • t MOOD 24.Su 225.5c 9.e e 430E AUOItIAO i FIOMICIAL C i _- .-- - Y S•i^.O.GO Sr4..U.Cu 10C. 4309 E1161MEERING CC%SULT146 c M ��-- - - ---- - r 421.6A 42).bt-999.9 . -alit OT14EN CCNi4LTIW UltVICES C __ Y 1•C:Q.%' t4.56C.5� 13.56(.37.456.0 • ••�• TOTAL FAOFES!I(%AL S.Rv!C C T 6.470.f,G 70.1�A.2S 13.588.25-316.6 - ---JAU& 0443AG46 . Y 925.00 925.00 TOTAL COAMUMIC4TiOMi C - u: �! Y 925.0C 925.cc 4322 r PRIATINi t fURIICMINi C ., : t 3.000.00 905.74 2.014.26 32.9 ��.• TOTAL PAINTIAG-PUBLISH-AO C 174.97 t J•Ov0.0.' 9e5.74 2.014.26 32.9 I, tUIPOMOT i RAC RENTAL'*. CALa 4 • TOTAL RENTALS C 4. � F ,j 1984 CITT CF CAW 10►TION 921 )!VISION- O►tPATING STATEPENT•fil CBJECT AS CF 9-30-84 PAGE 2 Cl GENERAL f UNO DIV 11 CITY COUNCIL COACT CESCRIFTIGN AP►RO►RItTION ENCUPIGNANCE rXFE%rITURt PRIOR P0, AOJ UNENCLP BAL PC? HAS PLAN HRS USED 4356 REETIRGG-COIIF-SCHOOLS C • r r 200.00 48•CO 152.0C 24.0 P •••• MAL OTHEF CL'NTRACT SEPV C r 7one ^ 4G•0G 152.00 24.0 437U QLkEFAL LIAV LITY INSUR c _ . r - 1 , t' T• dC dig." 19736,54 33.6 r• 4377 UMBRELLA LIABILITY INSUA C f 4379 INSURANCE AGE&I Of RECOPD C 76.0 76.G7-999.9 a • •••• TCTAL INSUNA6CER C Y 2.61S003 9S4.S3 1.66C•47 36.s 43Gu MttGENSMI►a. - ._----- —.-_. -- C Y 16•540.09 .. -- 4322 _K911116 LRFLXSLS • . _ _ __ _ C Y 1J0•o- 43/S-DOXATICUS__ _._ _ _.-__-.-. _-..._ C Y SOo•oo ••.. TOTAL _OTMEA..Z6AM&&------C- r 17.140.00 J C TGTAL ANOUN13 TMIS CIVI=ION Y 44.2t0.OG i 2.994.oa /6•S1S.a0 25.0C 99.8 • 33.13 1S9.e2 S9.12.159.8 ... soa•oc - I6.67t•G2 46i.1R 97.3 ,.� J 49330.64 S�.B 49.279.02 S •039.02-1/1.4 450.: L t � 1984 CITT OF 4RCMC COPTION 021 OIVTSTON•OPERATINIi STATERENT•BY 06JZCT AS OF 9-30-64 PA6E 3 � - 01•6EMtaAL F "D DI9 12 ADMINISTRATION - -' ? t (' C0•KC1 OE6CRIF1ICN APPROPRIATION ENCVMOR►NCE EXPENDITURE PRIOR P0. ADJ UNENCUM SAL ►CT IRS PLAN MIS USED --4100- SAW196,00E44LAA ENPLOttd C 3.106001 - -267•S -.- t 7S•alS.00 44.912.43 31•C22.57 59.1 39355.3 . S '-.-4111 GNtill IPE•RS6LLAR EMPLOYEE C 67.3C - - 6.0 , t 6L0.0t 376.05 223.95 62.7 31*1 • ' 412L1 SALARiai-TEMP iMPLOYEES C 31.01 7.3 -- t 1.280.03 2./44.2C 464.2C-167.S 206.7 .� I 413U SLVLALkCE $AV _ C ' Y 622.97 ii8 _.._-.-A2u-i#CAIIiJ1-PLti _4iR06-96i1 C 30.95 r %.:29.92 ...�LSU-,MOLUAT_ $At 0646 9431 C _ _ 20.9L ` r 1.375.14 •'.,-•--a1�% cI1-#A16_4SO46-V891 C 2.065.46 r 2•S21.9c .- W - Zu-mIA1bUT I" C 447.4S Y 6.97i.00 4.611.43 414:..�L'M1.2.1X-�R►'fJl1Wt;OM---C -_ _ iS3.)/ r 1.4QO.00 942.75 r f.733.00 3•SS2.J7 4152 LIFL INSURANCE- C - -- -- -----33.36 ---- -- r 399•:C 305.62 41SS yIIRKAAMS LEAF 1%.W1LAl1CC-- -C T 1.OS6.00 711./0 •jf .•....TOIII p4A&OM1L BERYIC[S 4C 6•S02.72 - r 93.280.00 679012.24 O.." 4210 OFFICE SUPPLIES C r' 4220 MOTOR FUELS A LUBRICANTS C r 1.4�5.G0 N "F:> : 1t• 4232 CGUIPPCNT PARK a ACCES C "1 t 100.00 0148 S'60RS a PEPIOOICALS C T i00.00 680" +� 2.171063- _ 65.55 19022.?6 77.16 452.70 622, 91-999.9 I. 3.0 t� S•C29.92-999.9 359.7 24.0 1 •375. 14-999.9 1S1.0 .• 96.0 - 2.521.9C-999.9 167.0 2.36SO57 66.1 ,S 451.25 67.6 4` 29140.93 6200 93.31 76.6 -- --L, _. 344.20 67.4 «ice 269267.72 71.6 1.02a.17 67.1 452.24 69.3 47.30 90.5 4�i70.6 I ' 1184 C1T1 Cf CRCNC t0'TTON M71 OIVISIOA-CPERATING SlITEPENT•BT CIJECT AS Cf 9-30-84 PAGE 4 ,, Cl BLMEAAL-FU%D DIV 12 AORIRISTRATTCN CeJECT DESCRIPTION APPROPRIATICN INCUP9MANCE -•••• TOTAL-SLPPLIES•RAIN•REPAI C EXPENCITURE PRIOR P0. AOJ UNENCU' BAL ►CT MRS PLAN MRS USED 134.01 T S,27S.GC 39724.25 1,5SC.75 70.6 7 43U6 VTMER CCNSULTIW SERVICES C T _•••• I96J0. 19149.SS 4s0.1s 71.9 TOTAL PROFESSICNtL SERVIC C . 19149.lS 4sC./5 71.9 .� 432U T[LEPNCqE C 1t{.SS _ - _..._. _.'•`� 193:0. a67.73 412.22 68.3 4321 PCSTAGE C ------ -.___ 1 72S.C: 531.3@ 193•TO 73.3 - •••• TOTAL CONNYAICATIONS C r 20C2s..0 /.419.JR 605.92 70 #RI1.TIMi. r T 250.3: 112.a0 137.2t - - -�• .4323 AMATIS: ho.-_ _ . - -- C T rs. 2c '• __...-._sale• TOTAL-AASMIING-aYBLISfrAO C T 32S.�C 112082 212.20 34.7 _ w, �- 434.: NAIAT OFFICE ECUI►PENT C f „ T 3JS.f0 53100 IS6.50-141.T 43'.1 PAINT AUTO EQUIPMENT C--� --� - V -. -------___ T 7s0.00 425.98 !24.62 S6•{ ~ TOTAL CONTRACT MAIN-REPAI C� • -- - •a T 1912S.o0 957.4e 167.32 95•1 is C01lRI[R•OATA PROCESSING C •••• TOTAL CATA PROCESSING C .., •-nttuual�t6MsscA�oaLs t �.---_-----... vd r r -- -- -----_ - --- 1,IOO.CQ -- --- 1,037.44 -----._ . 1e2.54 ----- _ G4.S - ---- f t.. 1984 CUT OF ORONC (OPT?04 7?1 OTVISION• JFFRATING ST!TE%1ENT-RT OeJECT AS OF 9-30-84 PAS[ S L1-.QAI►TBA{r.940W-.____--_. .._ OIV 12 49MIAISTRA7ICN C@JECT DESCRIPTION APVRIIPRIATION ENCUPBALWCE EXPENDITURE PR!OR PC. AOJ UNENCUP BAl PCT Has PLAN Ma USED 437L GENE;AL LIAC•;LITT INSUR C (At. T 25C.0 47.20 81.1 . 4374 AUTCMOTIvE IRSLAANCE C a:c Y 34�.00 2eA.25 59.7' 8208 r 4175 804C+ ;ASUFAAC: C 010._.. r 6C.00-999.9 • ,: i 4377 UNEAELLA LIAEILITT TNSUR C - - T 2� 0. � 20C.00-999.9 •'� i 4379 INSURAAICE A$E%T OF RFC040 C T 1 r6.23 leG.23-999.9 •�� • TOTAL INSWINC ES - C .s•. ,. � T 394000 339.26-156.7 r 43tc Pt►tERstiPf C Ts.c^ ,jam T 725.00 134.35-11905Sao " 4381 TRAYSL-MILFSfE-PARKING C 11.5E T 100.CC 160.76 6(. 7t-160.8 4St: MCET,N,, EXFSeSES C 98.10 ------- -- ---------- -- - T S..O.OG 349.89 15C.11 70.0 ----- 4363 LICENSES S TANES C 5.00 _.... T 55.CU 54.25 .75 98.6 ---------.-- -- w _._...____ •��• TOTAL JTNER C1•49SEe C 129.60 - --- t 1#344.04-.- 19424.2S t4.25-103.2 'r 479C-ARIAC va-Z&ILasuMO LOANS -C--- ` T 193e1,.20 4855 TNT EXP-INTEWL"D LOANS C .. T •R ,r•r• TOTAL OTHER OISSURSEMENTS C TOTAL AMOUNTS TM S CIVISION C 1.3es.to 69.00 69.00 e.e84.t1 It I,3e5.CC 1 085. C0 69.0C 69.00 403.! ir ,:' 1" �; �d K `'�;;Iwir iNo ' :`... :. ..''is. ..a A ii °r .iilte.� .:<� ► 7. . 3 .''i 'ii�wGG�'aiiM� rgir+.��ff+.M.�.. Jar" w r .. . _ •- r:. _ ...- r r!v',:t .. ... .. _ 1984 CITT OF ORGAC /OFTION 021 01MI06-CFERATING STATEMENT -BY DEJECT IS OF 9-30-84 PAGE 6 O1 GiNEAA4-FUND- --- - 0211 12 ADMINISTRAT[GN CBJECT DESCRIMON APPROPRIATION ENCUMBRANCE EXPENDITURE PRIOR PO. ADJ U%ENCLP BAL PCT HAS PLAN MRa USED } r la • r r 1 l� 19A4 CITY OF jRCVC I:PT±ON -?) D•VTSTON-OPSRATINs STATrMrNT-PT OBJECT AS OF 9-30-84 PAGE J1 SUAEAAL FUND DIV 13 ELECTICkS - - CeJECT L'S,'PIFTICN AFPR)PRIATI^.N CNC'J"SPA tic ' EXPENOITUR£ PAIOK /C. AOJ U%INCUP HAL PCT MRS PLAN MRS USEI 410U SAL.' 42ES-REGULA4k EMPLOYEE C 676.6n 61., Y e.789.5C 3,17C.FQ 59t5t.1i 35.6 293.1 4111 OWERIIP.E-REGLLAR EMPLOYE_ C 23547 14.1 T 0.':C Z92.0i 1C7.a2 54.4 18.1 412U SALALIES-TER; [MrLCT£ES C T 250.)C .43 249.57 .2 .' 4131 VACLTI,N PLY 4;R,56 9971 C T 223.45 223.45-999.9 4132 1+OLIJAY ;At (PA" 9elt) C 11.79 T 10C.49 10C.4 M999.9 413'_ SICK PAT IFRCG 969) C - _ - T 89.10 89.10-999.9 4141 FEPA-C:TT CONT,tI9UTIJN C 19.36 Y 637.^C 243.17 393.l3 3P.2 4142 FICA: CIIT C"TR;NUTIZN C 20.6') Y 4 '1 .;?; 1 4.7 296.3C 26.1 4153 •ORKKANS C614r IASURt :C£ C r 1J.c_ 10.0_ 1G0.0 ••.. ICIAL FLkSZ%Al ScRYi:Ei--. C ----- - 963.57 7S.i T 4s194.30 6,392.7C 39.6 311.3 ' 4210 OFFICE SUPPLIE: C I2T.G^ r U0000 1s9.11 - ••.. TOTAL SUPPLIES-MAIN-REPAI C-- 127.00 Y SJ0.00 159.11 4303 LEGAL.-CC,4SULTIIG SERVICES C i 4310-CLECTION Jl104f l `' C •••• TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVIC C T 25.00 1,932.24 34C.l9 3103 340.19 31.4 25.00 _AIM, 4. 1 14tl4 C:TT CF �PCV; WTI-)►! "21 LT GLhfFJL : Uec 13-CLECTIONS CSJECT JESCRIFIIzM icppOPRIti_JN •••• TOTAL CJMMLflCGTIONS -.c v iatt PNtIAti�Nti G PwtiCUING C •++• t01Lt FAI%?IAG•PVKISN•AD C v 32s.03 4341, PANT CFFICf acul►"E"T C _ - . - _. ____ _ v__ •••• TOTAL CONTRACT MRIN-ARE►aI C 43s0 11E(T;1*4S-CO11F•ScMO,LS c r 54.flC •••• TCT:L ;:ThEF C06TAACT SEkV C r 50.00 C.VISION-.icEPATIVS STRT=MEMT-Er 33JECT AS CF 9-30-84 PAGE 8 CtiCUMBP;RCC EIIPENOMME PRIOR PC* ADJ UNENCUP •Al PCT NRS PLAN NRS USED 203•ss IM42 62.6 1• �T 224•63 • .` ,e 241f•3T 75.63 76.7 224.63 249.3? 7 5.6'. 76.7 xS u _._..- .. ___.. _. _ 4STE sjkEAAI ltAf:L:1r IN4UR t T 3s•00 �•♦ 4513 EGU2PNEhT fL0ATG3 INSUR C 1 IO.00 13C.cc • 4310 111SURAtICE ASEST OF RECOAO t - - --- — f 29.23 2!• l3wMeg .� • "all ►ol AL INSYAANCES C - -- --'.: tes.co 29•23 13s.TT tt.T • `j. 43l1 tRtrEl-NILtA4t•PARRlNN C --too. ac_ • TOTAL GUEP ClARCES c •• _Y 00 I got .�� �. T 17.05z.Go t 1- t2 • so 44--"- s 1!.sz- +1.41i- Sos- ----5--ul.44_ —7s.2 1./45.72 509204.2e 40.1 311.3 ' 1914 Csfr CF ORCNC IOPT!3N 1171 DIVISION-OPERATINS STATEMENT-PY OEJECT Cl GCNtP,4L FUNO - OIV 14 ASSESSING - . -- OBJECT OESCRIPTIGN APPROPRIATION ENCUMORANCE EXPENDITURE PRIOR M0. AOJ --4100 SALAAIC3-*i4LLAR EMPLOYEE C 266.13 / r 39371.16 -4111 W ATINI-414ULAA EMPLOYEE C 36.6S r 93.^p 412u SALLAIES-TEMP EXPLOYEES C Y 249.19 4131 VACAT:Cn PA1 t:A;p.9bl) C --- Y 431.21 _ _4132 HOLIDAY RAI If&". 9Ab) C 39.31 Y 177.79 4113 SICK.PAY IPACG 9991--- _C -.. Y 4141 PER& CITY COMTAIBUTIJN C 14.45 ' r 415.)0 2C9.69 _ 4142 FICA--CITY-COIIlAlaUTI3M - C 23.80 1 Y 525.0C 279.64 41S1 HOSFITALI24TICk INSURANCE C r _.._41 S2 L IFL I t::UR6ACt- ------ --- -- C- ' Y 13.00 41 S3 11OAKM"& C4MP--I%SUF&NCC C- ' r 15.00 9•r,3 aa.•--SpZI1.-IeiiiJNAL�[RIII;t3_�;�_ �--..r-- -------3�t0.S4--- Y 10.2$1.00 4�SS9.23 4210 OFFICE SUPPLIt! - C -- --------`-5.46 f AS OF 9-30•84 PAGE 9 ? UNENCUM RAL PCT NITS PLAN HAS USEO 40122.24 45.0 3SS.0 .� _._ ._. 2•S -_.• 93.01-999.9 6.7 249015-99909 1.2 4C7.27-99909 _ t 177079-99919 f tS.71-999.9 , 2C S. 31 so. s 245.3! 53.3 1.783.0C 17.0C ' 5.97 6002--- 59361+77 47.7 44 Y 630.00 266.20 383.8O 41.0 4240 BOOKS t PERIODICALS C .� ••+• TOTAL SLFFLIEI•MAIN-AEFAI C T 3( 4306 MIA CCMSULTIIW SERVICES C r •••• TOTAL PROFESSIONiAL SER9IC C 279.20 S70+00 3202 39s•9 y?..'.. 1964 CITY CF COMO 01 GENERAL FUAC CBJECT i;LSCAIFTICN 432L. TELEPHONE 4321 POSTAGE tOPTION ^tl OIVISION-JPEAAT!NG STATEPCNT- 9V OBJECT AS CF 9.30-84 PAS[ 10 OIV 14 ASSESSING APPPgPRIATION ENCUMBRANCE EXO MITURE PRIOR PO* AOJ UNENCUM SAL PCT t HIS PLAN NRS USED E, _.----- C 11B.1a r 193100C' e8208 427•82 67.3 • r 3500G0 193.77 156.23 55•4 ' •••• T07:L COMML'AiCAT:ONS C r 19660.�8 1907S.9S Sa4.OS 64.8 f ' 4312 PRIbTlh6 a P1.BtICMINS C r ..-- ._ _ . 2W•OC 122.0G 77. 10 619S err• TOTAL PAINTINfrPVBLISN-AO C - r-•-- ----2000D: -- 122e9C _---77.1G 61•S 434L PA116T OFFICE EQUIPMENT C r 1S0.00 iS7.S� 7.SC-1GS.O ••• • TOTAL. CCYTAAZT_JIAlN- WAI C_..._.-_ r 1S0000 1S7,50 7.s0-1os.o,� ti�5� �.jw� y rAT-' FFLCCE!lk( C '3 •••• TOTAL ^ATA FNOCEiS!NG C Y •�� 4359 INTER-QOVT SERSICES C J" TOTAL OTNII t CNTRACT SEMI C -r 4Jl•aoo.o0 - -- a2.o00.00 • �66.08-�04 s 125e00 23./3 101.SI 1S.S ,,; r 92.ta 92. 11-999.9 r 125.00 115.31 - 9.69 92.2 ICTAL AMOUNTS THIS DIVISION C v 539636*02 sos.�a 49,741.12 39194•48 92e7 saes 39s•9 4 Wn t f.• j 1 1715 Cliv Of ORCN! 40►TION 021 01V!3I0N-OPERATING STATEMENT -BY CBJCCf AS Of 9-!0-8A ►Ai[ 11 a' _._...._ 01 4[AI[8AL-4060 . _.. _.._ OIV 14 ASSESSING COACT DISCRIPTICN APPRO►RIATION ENCUNSRANCE EXPENOITURE ►ORIOR PC- AOJ UNENCUM BAl PCT NRS PLAN MRS USED •G 1 Ili . J! t ... .. st G • . 2 a+ n ' I - ai a1 M� I low jj 1 jw 1924 CITY CF CRONO COPT10N F71 DIVISION-GPERATING STATfPl4T-ET DEJECT AS CF 9-30-84 PAGE 12 C1 GENEM.:L F U160 OI9 Is F INAwC fo CQJECT OESCATFTI:M APS-riOM IATION ENCUMBRANCE EXPENDITURE PRIOR R0. AOJ UNENCUR GAL PCT "AS PLAN MRs USED 4100-41ALAAME R[GLLA4 EMPLOYEE C - 39940043 -- 330.7 !� r ssoll18.Gt 3F9376.43 18946107 66.9 . 4113 GMEAT INi■ AEGIILAR ENFLOYEt C - - Y 6.CC 6.00-999.9 .i c� 4124A SALAAlcS-TEMP-EMPLOTEES l 4.24 1.0 - --;-� 133.04 96.9E 57.6 27.8 .� 4131 9ACLIZ 1 PAl-01" 9JF1 C-- - - 138.7i 24.0 _r r 20559053 29SS9.53-999.9 2F4.0 4132 MOL:OAr-9AT-4l-AOG-9&A1 C 222.43 24.0-- -r`. r 1•^92.1F 1•C92.71-999.9 120.0 "40 is 4133 BICM AA1 -lFABG- 9391 _ --.. .- C 14C.58 - 2011 ----• N. Y 967.91 967.91-999.9 133.3 4141 FERA• CITT CCM14:9LTION C 2.946.L9 1.C24.9/ 66.6 ^,»,', 4142 FLCt.C1T8-C44IAIAUTiJN-- C. __ 111.17 ----- --- r 3.9Q9.Ct 20830P 19125442 71.2 w 41S1.-410404TALIU1144-I4SIIAAhM C 290.74 _.._ at r 3.752.01 2.616.66 1913S.34 69.7 •1 - - - ASS2 Lut- s+�wa�cs- �� ^- C - -- 28.06 T 322.0r Z59.22 71.78 r 146.OG 171.21 31.t1-121.4r# - as�_i4i C-___-,._..._-.--•--__--- -----.- - ----1.265.37--- --- 400.0----'tom � r 619268.00 50,009.4s 17925loSS 74.3 3978193 2.46 ' 4110 OFFICE SUPPLIES C .c r 1.400.00 944.63 455.37 67.5 4l4U IOORS t PERIOCICALS C --V pq T s0.00 76.66 26.66-1S3.3 "� ••.. TOTAL SUPPLIf1-MAIM-REPAI C 5.46 M r 1,4s0.00 19021629 42G.71 70.4 4320 TELEPHONE C 59.45n. a. sam-ass not Y. " 4321 POSTAGE C 1934 CITY OF ORC+IC --01 SENCRAL- ENNO _ __ .._ _ coats? CESCAIPTICN •.I._....__u.•. TOTAL-0NMNNICATIONs $OPTION C71 OIV 1S FINANCE APPO!"P IATION C Y 1.22S.:C r 4388 PIIINTIAB i PUBLICHING - C Y Moor •••• TOTAL PRIh1IGG-PUBLISH-AO C 4344w WRY OFFICE 14LIPRENT C --- .. ____ __ _.-- Y 125.E C 4342 PAINT ►ISC EQUIVRENT C •••• TOTAL CONTRACT RA10-11EPAI C -_ 43s2-LOGIS-AORIA SERVICE--- - c --•- Y 3.112.0'' 4353 COLOItR-OAU F43CESSING C Y •0.29 - 4314-w6t4•CLA115-2_IS11CSSK(111 C Y 2.530.03 C Y 9.e10.Cc -C _ 1S•292.00 �+ 4356 MEETINGS-CONF-:CHOOLS C "' i •••• TOTAL OTHER CONTRACT 3ERV C 200.00 N " 437u GENERAL lIlitlST1 tNSUR C - • ----- --2CAI .00 1414 AUTCROTIVE TN3UANCE C 10.0c: -.- .- 4375 BOMOS IRSIMANCE C DIVISION OPERATINQ STATEMENT-PY OPJECT AS OF 9-30-64 PAGE 13 ENCUMBRANCE EXPE W TURE PRIOR PC. AOJ UAENCVP 9AL MCT 14AS PLAN HRS USIO 9v].6P 231.]2 ai.t . • 9S.7S 104.lS 47.9 g� 9S.7S 104.25 47.9 14 O �e 2S9.27 _ a, 23 29074.16 19C37./4 66.7 %4 u 4.00 71.24 21.2E-142.6 .o 2.530000 100.0 _ 79213947 2.3116.S3 7S.1 11911"091 3.403.09 77.7 ----- 134.60 2S3.60 138.00 —� 233.�0 --- — - ---- — s 9 5.6S------- -- --- -- _ _33.00 --- 1d:' 53.60-12G.B s3.bo—t26.a — -- 11.91- 93.A - - - --23.00-330.0--- IS84 CITY OF ORCA( 1CF710" C7! O:YISION-OPEPAT?NC ST:TENENT-11T #)EJ-CT AS OF 9-'O-e4 PAGE 14 0 4FAEAAL FUAG On 1S FINANCE CBJECI CESCFIFTICN APPROPRIATIFIN ENCUMBRANCE SXCENCITURE PRIOR PC- AOJ UAFNCLP PAL PCT NPS PLAN MRS USED 4376 MONEYS t SECURITY C T 150.00 35.00 115.CC 23.3 • 4379 IN:+L.%A..CL AGEAI Of R&COOD C y 150.63 15C.61-999.9 •••• TOTAL IhSUAANCLS - C T e6P.^.0 610.71 257.2ti 70.4 A 4380 11tPliA"TPS - C 75 5.00-1o6.7 • v __--4311 TRAVEL -MILEAGE -PARKING- -'C 522.02 42.D 1t 91.0.OG 377.9d - 4391 CTrtR CMAQEt3 - r C__.-_ 25.6E 25.66 • T 25.CG •••• TOTAL OTMEP C14RGES ~� C 53.46 483.66 51l.34 4E.4 TOTAL AMOUNTS T1613 CI0ISi0N _ C - 69602.11 4OC.O • 65.566.A►, 22.Ce1.2C 74.6 3.781.3 K> � CI11 CF CP;A' 1CPT'jN C71 C:VI!ION OcCvcT:YC, !7ATEPENT•11T 094ECT A' OF !.]p.,A NAit 1g CI ;EAErAL rUND GIV 16 LE -,AL. CPJFCT :"SCR:FT:CN APPA9PRIAT10N CMCU0604tNCE fX'EYCITURC P?•OP ►O. 10J UNfUCI'M HAL PCT HAS FLAN NAS YSCD AiU1 LEGAL-MLIA71% F C . r 9.511O.lC 2.769.75 6.73C.25 29.2 43u2 LCiAL-CC:/Ri AFFEagw`ICiS C . r te•a':O.Gr 9,1)7.1� ls�e22.T1 32.e ._ ._. 43u3 LE"L-CCNSULIIty SLRVICr': C 3•R74.75 t•l7S.7S 10.• -� _. _ .... TOILL PAJFLSF::'J.L S4.PVIC C r 5(`.•I)0._ igr171.10 14•22t.21 ' - A3i? Mt1►t1Ni A +2L•LICM: aG c r 39.<4 !9. A♦-999.9 +•• Te?il PRiMTiMi-PUOLISM-AD C 19.04 IS.t4-999.9 i Asff •I8IL CHAAiit C 639.75 V 190'�0.1J' 7.067.22 11.932,7t 37.1 •••• TOTAL OTh9P CSNTAACT SERV C 639.75 TOTAL AJ14uAT,. T4-:S--UW1344N C -- _._.. 619.75 ' t i7�0?0.00 27•A1Q.tS 46,121.15 13.2 u _ Ak mz;'M'" M't"'i'":� ..2.i�f' `rrc. :� .� :`_�..'�51*il.''r s+r►,v�wy+�+.Ls.ki�Kikl- .tl� .1 191l4 C;tT CF GRCNC ICPTT7N ^21 C?VISION-CrfFATIhr. SLAT-PfNT-FIT "FJfC' A'_ CF 9-70-a4 F16E 16 i Cl 6CAf.z:.L FiLAO DIV 17 60VLCkMrNT rUI' OINt„ 1 MECT LLSChj FTI:.N APFq:pRIeTIOM ENCUP8A44C-- txvr4cTTUAf PRICk PC. AOJ UV NCLM PAL PCT HAS FLAN MPS USED 410J EALAill S-AfGkLAA EMFLOTEf C 419.bt 33.2 1 10,024.-1 3.697.33 7 t i 2 f . f 1 33.8 293.4 d 4111 OVEkTIMt_-ALGLLAA EMFLIYEE C 1 235.39 7S.7S-111.7 17.0 412L SALAeIzS-TL11v EMDLOYELS C 13.SC 1.% r 13.SC 13.SC-9Y9.9 1.5 A131 VACAT:"I CAl 11A36 Yall . _-c - 127.54 r $02.49 5;:2.49-999.' 4 4132 HCLIJA'• PAl (FA66 9411--_--t 42.1% r 2r1.3m i'1.37-5�9.5 4133 SICt PRv ,t.CG 9B9) _._tZ r 247.LC i47.cc- 9YJ.1) 4135 MoLa T 1 LV 0A�.d V97 1 C r r 27.6C 27.6r-999.9 4141 iLR:- C:'1 CGA,TI;IMUTION C 24.79 ' T 612.C: 214.7t 377.22 39.4 "4 1 _ A1♦ ICs•CITt Cik1w:RUT I :p C 40.91 f t ».CC 319.21 ASs.41.0 4153 adJFKMAU� C.Mt .A).U4AMCi--- C r 46•ao 46.00 ;a 41 •-+• TOT&L 4PLA4rkAL 5CRV:CE.: C _- ._-.---_._M..__.....____.--------__._____ N3.K _ _- -_ ____ __....--_ _.-- -- _ _._-- -._,_ _ 34*7-• 3 ' T 120561.00 3s4 rso" 1OCs2.32 43.6 311•• Koi • ONVAt! 1t R SUPPLI C 100.63 19190.00 446.18 • 4132 COUIPMEMT 04111S 4 ACCES •s•• Yot41 SUMLIES-MAIN-REPAI C 100.63 r 1�i00.OQ 641.71 43U3 LEGAL-CCMSULTlu SEArICES C 4306 OTUCA CCNSULTIM6 SLAVIC[S C �; " •••• TOTAL PAOFLSSI04AL SERVIC C ^....�, a �A't� '� �:a•i4A�f:•. 19053.22 21.0 194.93-9"09 f5l.29 4208 1M 4 CITT OF ONCNO 11101TON ^TI OIV-110M OF.aATIy4 STATErEMT-O♦ ONJECT AS OF 9-10-84 pAOE 17 O1 •i1K1a�L J YND DIY 17 GOVEPNNT N'. POILO1116- CvJECT DESCRIPTION AVPP 21PA I AT 10% :►1CUNBR4NCE rXPEMDITURE PRIG; Pa. AOJ UNINCLM PAL PC MRS PLAN MRS USED ' 4324 UTILITIES C 425.22 T 11.00O.J� 69'69.32 4.93C.61 SS.2 .a• TOTAL UTILITIES C 415.10_-_- ♦ 11�Oi0.C^ 6.r69.32 4.SIC.tt 4331 tOYIPNEAT I PAC RENTAL C ---- --- ---- ♦ 545.CC 545.CC-999.9 4332 OFFICE Oft lYILCINB MENTAL C _ - ♦ 120.or, 120.0e loos •••• TCTiL kEf4TALI C :. a� - T_ 120.00 665.C3 145.CC-S54.2 _. .__.____.__.-_.____._ ••: Is 11� 4542 Mat•.i M:SC t0>J_PNE14T C :•� a• • r 17S.CC t5v,43 4E4.43-376.8 ••« sc . i 4343 Na;k, ilILGS • GAOU'.:j.i C 1.916.11 _ +. r 7040.3C 3.818.00 3082.0 4341•dAAIMIAL 441MCE C ♦ 5030.0- S.1 b1 .6G 1 . t 38*4C 63.2 _ • u••-ZOT-A4-444141ACi-N►IN•SEVAI C 2.s64.42 ♦ t2.1�S.7C 7.639.C3 49535.97 62.7 -- - -.;. _ 4370 blKAAL LIMLITY INSUR C ,� ;:-- r - i50.G, 23.13 126*87 13.4 4311 MMERTT IhiYRA110E c .. ♦ 560.00 464.00 96000 82.0 4 • 4372 BOILEN S PACMIFERT INSUN C - ., T 200.01 150.uu 50.00 75•0 „ r 4379 INSURANCE ASEAT Of RECORD C �r _ •••• TOTAL INSURANCES .� ♦ 910.00 4383 LICENSES A T ns C es.s7 207.30 77.2 '.✓h 4r. �.t]I i� rilr �+4.. '!'►. ..�'� '. _� ; is IOtA CITt OF ;,RCN] #OPTION Qtl 0!Y!SION-OVC5ATlN6 STATEMENT-LPY CFJECT AS CF 9-30-84 PAGE lA Cl AENCRAL fUkD 01V 17 OBYERNMENT RUILOINES _ i ClJECT OESCRIf12ON - ••• • TOI AL OTMEO C►AACp APMRI'PRIATIJN ENCUMBRANCE C EXPENCITURE PRIOR FOS AOJ UNENCLP BAL /CT NOS PLAN NO$ USED MAL ANOUNIS Thtt EI112itON C 70573.89 -- -- - -- ; 3407 --_ r 3t•tee.:� 219375.17 16919C.!3 55.1 • 311.9 .db r b I I �1 1 • 19E4 CI1r CF (4PCYC IOPTION C2) DTVISTOM OPERATIN4 STATERENT-ST 08JECT AS OF 9.30-114 PAGE 19 Cl GENERAL FUND _ __. DTV 21 HUMAN 4110ITS ____ • CBJECT G- SCPIFTTCN 385 CckAT.��S APPROPMIATION ENCUMBRANCE C EXQENrITUR_ Pa ml Inc. ADJ UNEMCIr AAL PCT "Its PILAU MA: USED Jt! T 495'_'4•CC 3.5'1.50 S72.5C 78.4 __—.—�_._ i .• none TCT1.L CTh-rF C►AA:,ES C • T 40504occ 31531.5C 47;.SC 78.4 • ICTAL lKjjNT. TW S LIVISiON C --... _ .._._ �_. T 4♦S^4•�. J•SS1.;� S72."C 78.4 r *i • .n.. no I 19P4 CITT CF CRCN-. (OPTION 021 —•-- tt-OENEFAL FL#0 019 39 CAJCCT OE3CRIFTI011 APO LIFE I ASUIIAIICE - - C T _.._._. •��• TOTAL PERSON&L SERVICE4 C r MAL ANOYNTS Tbit Oi9iS:ON C r DIVISION-OFERATI46 STATEPENT-HT CEJECT AS Of 9-?0-04 PAGE 20 POr AOJ UNENCUP SAL PCT NTIS PLA% NRS USED dt t1 .r _.._..-ii u� 1 ._ 19l4 C111 CF GRC%C lOPTI3N ^21 D!VISI05 CFEPATING STATEPENT-ET OEJECT AS OF 9-30-84 PAGE 2/ Cl GENERAL f UkO - OIY 31 POLICE OPOTCCTION C!?JECT OESCRIFTI4N AP•RnPRIATION ENCUMBRANCE WCRT MAE PR!OA PO. AOJ UNENCUP SAL PCT HIS PLAN HIM USED AM SALA4IES-01MAR EMoIOVEC C 26.125.56 2.062•S - -;; T 390.337.00 253.737.9I 136.599,^f 65.0 20.297.3 4111 UVEATI►E-MMLAB EMPLOTEE C 10901041 r T 12.411,34 S•SM 66 69.0 665.6 412U SAtARIES-TEMP EMPLOYEES C 35.63 9.S T 152.10 152.IC-999.9 3100 4121 CYERIIRi•IEKF EM:LOTELS C T 4130 SEVEAFACE-6A1---- C -~F• T 3.9t;0. 2' 3•COE.00 :. 4131 VACAT144 FAY J1,R46 9811 - C 2.318.92 - - 192.0 •-----_; T 12.69C.32 12669E. 32-999.9 944*0 4132•MOLIOAT FA1 IFAOG 9881 C 201.68 16.0 r 14.213.9`. 100040/4 13.2Cl.86 7.1 80.0 .: 4133 SICK RAT-4FRCG-" 91 C 203.S2 - 16.0 -.-' T 5.425.71 S.425. 71-999.9 404•5 )4 413S-INJURY PAT 4FRC6-9901 C -- -.. r 2.974.74 2.974.74-999.9 SO.S 4136 OTNEk PAY 4to"•9981 -- ---- C-'-`- T 17.76 17.7l- 9 99.9 - 4341-. x9sx- CIIT CONTAIGUT14%- 395 - _._. . T 49.371.CC 3554.3 17.866.87 63.8 •'S _4142 FICA- C:JT-Z"3Ai8Yt- 4X--•----C --- - -- _ - ------107.24 T 1.438.00 /9011019 426.81 70.3 1 • T6S. 21 T 23.7r0.00 139927036 7.852.64 67.0 J' .` ' -_-_ i352-L vvc* IAISYRANCE --t °, T 700.00 614.00 86•00 St.t �` �saluurs_WAWA C ��usl T -- 20.427.00 tt•t72.32 8.154.68 60.1 4157 IN Aun ARJCCI _ ..f T ��r $2192"*00 •sa, 349•r43.03 ' ,� #_" 1�71.522097 67./ 2293240f y �kt..:� • ITE4 CITr CF CRCNC IOFTIJN n?1 DIVISION-CPEPATING STATEMENT -ET OBJECT AS Of 9-30-04 PACE 22 w 01.OEKUL-,FUKO OIV 31 POLICE PROTECTION COJECT GESZRIi1ICR APPR9PRIATION ENCUMBRAK E EXFENDITURE PRIOR ►C. ADJ UNENCLN RAL PCT HAS PLAN NM Yip ' 4210 OFFICE SUPPLIES C 37t.15 r 3,950.00 3.672.45 277.Si 93.0 lb 422U MUT:R FUL2 I LUBRICAkTS C i,l10.71 r 24,O�D.GC 1e•467.57 S9532.43 76.9 4421 CLOTHING t PEP594AL CQUIP C IOO.:C • T 1.2 0.0- 20242.70 2.5S7.30 43.1 ` 4931 BLDG t GROUMOS NSR SUPPLT C r 1'?7.C3 lo7.03-999.9 4932 EOUIPREMT PARTS t ACCE S C r 3,630.00 2.44S.35 1,154.63 Nag 424U BOOKS t PEPIOOICALS C 1'4b r 7010•C0 606olS 93.95 86.6 4241 TRAINING SUPPL IES C K_ • r I95.0.0C 499.u6 1,cCC.94 33.3 •••• TOTAL SUOPLIES•RAIN-MEPAi C 20314.69 r 30.9SO.00 209040021 10.539.79 72.0 ~ w ' UU3 LEGAL•CCUSULT166 SEMVICTS C 1 •a20.OG 9.0 4306 OTPER CENSULTIKG SERVICES C 4,D00.CG _. - 3•C47963 _- -- - ---- 9S2.37 16.2 ---_.- _ --_ 4b •••• TOTAL PROFES21CNAL SERVIC C 29172,37 --4 3. S - - ------ -- -a9S.70 Alb 4,106.31 2OC93.69 66.2 'r __�.iaa.a_i-0TAL_COMiIUNIL�TIDNS C- - --- r T,3C0.fo u' 4322 PRINTING 4 FUBLICHING C T /•800.00 J •••• TOTAL PRINTIKS-PUBLISH-AD C r 1•800.00 936.91 493.10 5.043622 147.60 10333.62 147.60 1.333.62 .*�: 4 163a09 SSa2 2,2S6.70 69.1 466.31 7401 466.1f 74.1 u■a M�p I t 1964 C11Y OF ORONC IOPTTJN 021 DIVISION-OFERATIMO STAT{PENT-BY OBJECT AS OF 9-?0-84 PAGE 23 03-49490A1c-OYAO•- '- --OIV 31 POLICE PROTECTION --- COJECi KSCRIPTICII APPROPRIATI24 ENCUMBRANCE EXPENO!TUAE PRIOR PO. ADJ UNrNCLo BAL FCT MRS PLAN MAS USED ' -' - -� 4324 UTILITIES~ C 230.16 1 296^0.0r 1.977.36 622.64 76.1 1 •��a TOTAL UTILITIES C 230.36 T 2r6':0.00 19977.36 922.64 74•1 r 4330 RADIO RENTAL C 1_ 4.610.00 4.f1[.CC --.- 4331 EOUIPKEAT t NAC RENTAL C 4532 OFFICE CA BUILCING RENTAL C 695.66 ----------_ _,__- Y er244.3: 6017C.94 2$C73.DC 74.9 •••• TOTAL RENTALS C 68S.66 t 120IS4.00 6,170.94 6.l8!.06 48.0 - 434L MAIRT•-CFF-ICE-ECUIPMENT C T 1r1s00.00 380. 0 1.42C.CC 21.1 , 4341 KAIAT AUTO-EAUIPAENT C - 535.65 - -- -'- Y 99000.0.i 4,927.79 49C72.21 54.e ,. 4342 Aalftl K:SC.EtU:PKt1►T_ .. __. C 1 900.00 771.33 12l.67 BS.7 4343 AAIMT_OLD"-•-GROUk0&_, _. C- 129.111 1 6i.0.C'' 979.57 !75.57-163.3 „ .4341 JAMITLRI1l-SLAYLCE _.-C_-_ _ 223.60 1 29700.00 1,1ssoko 911.2C 66.3 -__._- u•"01AL--CCKTRAC1-"2X-ALRAL_.C..__--.----- --- - -------- - -- - $19.23 1 ISOON .0Q 8.e47.49 60152.91 59.0 4336 MEETINGS-0011F-SC4OOI.a C 210.00 �+ 1 2960/•00 29913014 113.14-104.0 � - ••• • TOTAL JTM£A CONTRACT SERV C Z10.00 T 29800.00 29913.14 113.14-104.0 f 4370 GENERAL LIABILITY I113UR C m ■.____-.1.200.On -495.Z2-141.3 4371 PROPERTY IMPANCE C :-y'` K .�It rare ..... r� �•� _�_ I 1964 CfTr OR CRCNO /0►TION C21 DIVISION -OPERATING STATEPENT-OT L@JECT AS OF 9-30-64 PAGE 24 Cl U49R1L-FUAO - OIV 31 POLICE PROTECTION --_ -- ' CP.JECT OESCRI►TION APPROPRIATION ENCUMBRANCE EXPENOITURL PRIOR PO. AOJ UA:NCUN BAL PCT NRS PLAN NRS USED -- �' 4373 f QU TF PEMT-IV,CATEAS :NSUR C r 175.0^ 31.UC 14i.CC 17.7 �' ~ - --' ' --- ' — - 4374 -.AUT tMC T l WE-INSURANCi C r 3r706.7C --- 1.21900C 67.1 . 4375 BCNCS I&SUASWC -. C 4311 UNBAELLA-LIA`ILLIV IkSUR- C +• 4319 - INSURANCE--A4Z%l- OF-UC,4 D C r 1�110.2I 1.11E.27-999.9 •.•. TOTAL-I*SUAAACtS--- - . _ .. C r _ 5.156.00 6•C25.29 - 637.29-116.1 -- ----'' •. 431i MEPBERSh:FT _ C r 750.00 761.50 11.CC•101.5 4361 TRAYtL-N:LEAGE-PARKING C 775.93 $.9 � 4332 NEE%NG EXAENSES C 4/.i4 4/.44-999.9 r w 4313 LICENSES 6 TAVES C v 70.C7 111.50 41.S0-1Sl.3 ;+ ••• • TCT eL OTMEP Ct'ARGES C T 19645.00 963.06 661,94 Sees r '•� 4520 IUILC1403 S STPUCTURES __ _�_-_r C _4•S�D.00---- __ -__-. ___ 4#426.70 - - ----_.._ - 73.3c---940 _. 454u CFFICE FURMFJXT-EOU:P C \ .N.• •,' 45SU AUICMOTIVE E6UIPNENT C T ___---- 240900.00--- --- .. 25.73S.64 _ —__ _ 939.64-103.4 - 4S6U OTtER EOUIiREA1 C . �' •••• TOTAL CAPITAL CUTLAT _,,, C t_—_SQ•ES0.D12_. z.`� +a_�.e_Sf - \� ^v a 5 Ll1lSSi0� 646.253 441 4l5.3S ' :'•1� • i w3� • +' • "P4 CITY CF GAIry 4OPT:-N 02) OIV!SICK- CFEF:TING STRTEPFNT-PY CF.J"CT A$ CF 9—!0-84 PATE 2i Cl GENERAL FUND DIV 31 POLICE FRCTECTTIN CRJECT CCSCR IFIX GN APPROPRIlTION EN.UNSR1NCE EXPENCITURE PRIOR PC. AOJ UNENCUM SAL PCT NRS PLAN NRS Uiio 1' 7 i vi s 1 s, n� . .y 7d • H • • Sw • too To 410 Y • • M .i � p L-I 19e4 cITT or ORCNO COITION C2/ 91VISTON-CVEAATi140 STATEPENT-RY OBJECT AS OF 9-30-e4 pNeE t6 ---- 01 4ENERAL-4UNO------- - OIV -32 FIRE PROTECTION tedECl GLURIPTICA 4109 A"ROPRIATION ENCUMBRANCE EKvEACITURE PRIOR r0. AOJ UNENCUM BAL PcT Nos PLAN MRs Ysty UL#AIt1-REGULAR ENPLME. t ____ T _•_ _._ 4141- P6RA• CI1 ♦ -coal moul leg t . ,• 4142 Pl".Cttt-CONTAIAUTION- t •SO& 14TAL-0449iNAL-4EANI.a+-.. -t _ _ �• 431S FIRE SEN♦ICCS Lr11 LAU t /3•a71.0a - �:. t aS�35S.00 539404.CC 6�2a9.QC-111•t as 4316 Plot ICAVItt1 ►APLE PLAIN C - - ♦ 99971.G0 2I592.39 74.0 a+ t 4317 FIVE SENNItt 010UNO t 10.157.71 _ n t 4292:0.00 409630*89 19569.11 96.3 y � 4311 FIVE SOME YITZATA t - T 159000Sri !. 119154.75 30t45.25 7404 �! ••• • TOTAL PVOPESSICNAL SERNIC C 23 •SSe. f0 ♦ 1129526*3c 1129768.25 241.25-10f.2 eve is OCTAL ANOdNt: this cI1rISIO+1 c 73.55e.70 �j. ., _"_� --T--_-- 1/29526.03 -___._—___ ._112s71i.2S - ____.. 242.25-100.2 1904 CIT7 Os cocno SOPTION 021 OTVISION•OPEPATING 1TATEPENT-BY OBJECT AS OF 9-30-84 PAGE 27 .OIV 33 PLANNING ANO 204I006 - COJtCT OaSCAIPTION APPR"PRtATION ENCUMBRANCE EXPEMO!TURE PRIOR PO. AOJ UNENCUM BAL PCT MRS PLAN HAS USED 4ALAkICS-AS6VLAA CXPLOTEC C 8052.74 _76t•5•.--- ' �- 1 95,432.00 66031.24 2897e0.74 69.9 6902905 . • 41.11 . QVCRT.I%toSE611LAA-CAPLOVEE C ; T 200.all 1910@1 $.19 95.9 Ilea • _- --- _-- Mu SALAAILS•TIMP .IMPLOTEES C tu2.43 24.1 34176047 29961.41-463.4 475.0 C Y ,• -----.___4131-9ACbTiJI/ P1t-4?AOi►--f►el./__._ C 11.25 - . 1 19311,54 1�311.SM999.9 S4.S :;� ___ --___If3?-NOLjOA>t--•PA1..�f�lOiA_ .---C - 3a0.tS _ _ _ 32.0 .._-..:; ♦ 10504060 19108660-999.9 140.0 __...._4133 SICA PA1 49046, 94991-- - C " Y 357.4Q 357.40-Otte 9 16.0 w• __-4136-Otkit +1A1- 4iRCi -99A1- . C- T 124.32 124.32-999.901 4141 QEa_ C:Tr CCNTRIRUTIOM-- C _. _ -343.67 - - - ---- 1 StSIS.CC 39599.64 10 13.3! 65.3 v 4142 F ICt. CITY CCa1w:hJII.)A C _ -_ .__ __- --$65.04 r 69337.GL' 49436065 1,90C.35 70.0 .. 10 ,,• _ _ 4151 "11 T LLIIIIIC4 I43U. ANCE C --------------391;•10-- __4.352.00- ---- -- - --- - __ - --- - 1 3,079.99 1,212.01 70.5 to _ 4152 LIF_ I:ISUAAA'L _. L r f.O.Ct --.&.4L 34.10 -------- 45.9C 4206 - 4153 WaRKAAAS CuPf iMSUAANCE [ __._._�... ` r 19115.26 7C4.74 62.9 •... T0141 C - - ----------- __9.149.4i _- 79♦ 1149631.0; 1169647.G4 27,983.96 75.6 6.7A2.0 fs.� i9. ` 421u OFFICE SU►PLIT! C 148.46 K, r 2,316.37 1,193.63 66.2 4220 MOTC4 FUELS 6 LUBRICANTS C 200.09 29500.00 19117.68 702.32 71.9 4132 E01'LPMENT PARTS 6 ACCES [ 4.16 909.51-S54.5 Y 200.00 10109.51 i. i". _ {F .. r a 14h4 CITY Cr CR(NC (rpT:JN 1:1`1 D•V!CION OVIPATING S74TEM:NT-f-Y CP.JECT AS CF 9-30-84 PAil. 27 . :1 GENEF-L fLkC DIV 33 FLANkIN5 INO 7)NIVE CFlJECT wLSChIFTICN APPRl%PRIAT10#4 ENC1)Map thC[ EXVEND'TURE PRIOR ►O. AOJ UMffNCUM BAL PCT MRS PLAN HAS USED 410u SALAkIE3-AEGULAA F-MFLnY[r C W- 52.74 742.5 Y 95.432.CC 66.73i.26 28.7rC.74 69.9 A019.5 4111 OVERT IRE-AL6tiLAA EMPLOYE'_ C T 202. E.15 95.9 17.0 412� S4L:.RIE.i-T:R.P ;M^LCYEiS C IL2.43 24.1 T P15.^; 39F76.4 2o961.47-463.4 4)5.0 413L SEV-7mEkCr FAY C � T 4131 VACi.TIj.Y PAT (3RC6 9111 C 11.25 T 10 311 .54 1.311.'4-999.9 84.5 - - -- 4132 NOL:jAV PAT 4FR.'4, 9431 C 3AG.45 32.0 T 1,fis.60 1.lGF.CC-999.9 140.0 -----4133 SICK ?AT I;Pcro 9691 C T 357.4.' ]57.4�?-999.V 16.0 4136 CTtL .'AT 4FAC4 V9e1 C i T t24.32 124.32.999.9 4141 CEKI Ci 1Y CCNTr 1BuTI JN C _ ,i43•Q7 _ __. ___ T 5.515.LC 3.599.64 1.911.3ti `s.j 4142 FICA CITY CON/wIUJTI.IN C -54S.04.-- T 6.337.GC 4o436•63 1�900.35 70.0 4151 hOSiI7tLTYA1IC&-:NSURANC£ C- T 49312.00 39079.N 1.2f2.01 10•• 4152 LIF-_ 1:4SURAAILL _ L _ _ A•4G-_- -.__--�-- T a0.00 34.10 45•9C 446 .4153 YOAI4AAQS WKc .ISSURANCE C - -. -- -- i: Y 19"0000 1919S.26 704.74 42.9 •: _...._ 101."-44,44JMAI G - 90%49.48 --7i.L T 114.631.0G A69e47.04 279983.94 75.4 a.7t+2.o WU OFFICE SUPPLItf C --------^-- -�---v 148.46 T 39500.00 2.314.37 19163.63 a6.2 4220 ROTOR FUEL$ 4 L110R1CANTS C 200.09- T 29500.00 19» 7.6a 702.32 71.9 (� 4132 EWIPIK NT PARTS ► ACCES C 8.16 T 200.00 19199.51 109.51-554.1 if "s' s t ' �!F' i I►�.� _ . 4.. � � 'iu' � irr�:J L:. Y�..� fi � 1984 CITY C: CRCNC 4-PTICN ^21 ^:Vi51JA-GGfRSiIv3 STiTrPrhT-1'Y CPJCCT AS OF 9-!0-A4 PALE 28 ` Cl wEAERAL ♦UAC DIV 33 PLANNIA4 AAO 27NING CSJECT U_SCAIr1ION AFPR9PRIATITS ENC'1MSR:NCE EAPENO!TURE PRIOR ►C. AOJ UAENCLO SAL PCi HAS PLAN HAS USED 4t4U 00.109 , A FEAI..CIC»LS C sees TOTAL :.L'PFLIES-MAIr-JEoal C 356.71 Y es700*90 5,620.46 1,079.S4 83.9 ` 431,! LEE:L-CCN5tM IAG SERVIC°5 C ` Y 2.0J0.3: 31M.32 1,ctC9.f[ 1o.i 4305 [N6. ,L..ING CW* ULTIvG C e 430e aTMLR CCNWITIA` SLaVIC:; C 7,217.24 6.7►z.7e 51.,, - -*at* TOTAL PSO►ESSIONAL SCRVIC C r 16•sn0.00 e,1S0 va e,?4S.Cc 49.4 432U TWOMONt C 1V8.29 Y 1,9ZO.:G 19Sti5.97 334.C3 h2.4 __._.__._. _._ _--• 4321 POSTAGE C r 19000.0r. 82C.69 179.31 r2.1 ----,; sets TOTAL C3NNU%:CATIONS C 198.29 -_-.--_ i 2•oJO..G 2s"6.ee 82.3 4322 1 .TiAi l-RtlllLiCMiJiO---- C Y SS0.04 499.10 SO•f0 •0•T I •. • . Tr .e AAIAjU&#-Wllll.ISN+AO-C-- i 15 r SSO.Cu 499.10 50.90 70.i • 4340 RAI &T OFF ICt t GUI PPENT C / r 300.0^ Se1.30 tt/•so•10l•i 4341 PAINT ALTO t0UPPENT C :« � •, r 1.000.00 943.00 /6.20 96.4 h- 4342 MA lAT •ISC EQUIPMENT - -C'-_ - - Y 150.00 180.84 3C.84•120.4 •••e TOTAL CONTRACT IMIN-A[rAI C-- A _ 2 T is 104SO.00 iR14s•14 :-� 2�O.1M120.4 y K R all 4353 COURIER -GALA PROCESSING C 17 ; at +, ;.• <. � .A•, c as.. • r .� .tea � .... A •:�1` .�' � 9_ r-, . 11984 C:1 -9 w_ (Of1I0N rl1 DIV:SIeW OFIR!1,4, 31AT,- ONE NY- Fr OBJECT AS OF 9.30-84 PAGE 29 91 4L.AEF1.l FL%c OIV 33 PIAN444 AAO 734ING • CBJLCT PFPR')PRIAT1011 £NCJNHPAACE EXDENCITUR,r PRIOR ►C. AOJ UNEMCII AAL PCT HAS FLAN HRS USED • 43SS DATA PR.Cf!f1}4 C T 275.''. 222.23 52.11 goes . •gee TOTAL - DATA- PROCUllNG C v 275.CC 226.41 40.59 82.3 . 4.536 "CETI US- CORP- lc"03ts C 48.SG >r 300e-' 4C3.50 1C3.5C•134.5 1 * •••• TOTAL OTNEP COstAAtt OCR11 C 4E.50 T 3.0.5 403.54 103.SC-134.5 437C OCAlEAAL LIA01LIT♦ INSUl1 C • 21i.01 79.G �._ __• " 4ST4 Abl'QIIOtiYE IMitRANCL C 458.50 510.5C 47.3 M'`• 43t9 IMSURAhCE /OE41 Of RECORD C 80 240.50 2AS.ShS99.9 •••• TOTAL Ihs11AA16CEI C 3a 1.339.Go g7C.9v 53F.61 60.4 ------ C - r 200.0" 1S3.00 47.00 16.5 ,;• i U 4391 1RALCl-11i1(AiE-PARItINji C 1'3.^' 132.1• 47.t4 K.4 _ _ 43g2 M[(T.A(►.;}itASf+ C i r 75.00 30.94 44.04 41.3 r not a TOTAL .-t111fA CLAAALS -_ C' ..... T 415.00 316e1 1SO.30 K.t I TOTAL AN4UMTS THIS CIVISION C T 109140.00 10.620919 t9D4 380322006 73.4 •0762:0 h.t� 1 � 19l4 CITY CF ORCN, ►OPT!JN r?1 DIYI!!OF-CCERATINC S1A!.re"41-PT ., A4.!; AS OF 9-30•84 PASS 30 Z1 GENER„L FCAD UIV 34 CIVIL OEFEoSE - COJECT G_SCPIFTI,ol APvRnPRIATION ENCUMBRANCE EXPENOITUIIE PRIOR PO. AO•► UNENCUM GAL PCT NITS PLAN NRS USED 4210 CFFICF SUFFLIES C 41.97 ----.----- t 41.97 551.03 7.0 • 4[32 ECUI: R&kT k.07- 4 .CCCS C 349.2C '~�! . T 3.G.".' 349.24 4. 2C•116.4 ••e• TOTAL_SLPPLI-5-0lA:A-;LPAI C 391.17 - . t 91L0.0^ 391.17 SOt.S3 4305 • 4�2U RIEPMcrE _---- C----• -- 62.99 ._., ♦ P40.30 569.26 I70.74 61.i r t • 1 75.00 73.00 • •••• TOTAL ':OMIIUAiCAT:3MS c 620" _,• T 913.0C 569.2t 345.74 6201 4lFt� rE►. ;M!PS C v 50.o: SC.CC ! •,•• TOTAL :IHLR :►AAGES C „• v s0.3C so.oc ----�; % TAL 4040..06`- I►:5 (:Y:S:JH C 434.16 — i 981�5.30 960.43 ct c, 5 • s1•s ; + A , 11}4 CITY OF ORE. /OPTI.N -21 1)TVISI94-JPERAi:Nr STATTMENT-HY OPJE:1 AS CF 4-30-134 PAGE 31 Cl GEAEA..L iUkf. DIV 35 ANIMAL COkTRCl CPJECI JLSCkYi1,.,A APP►nPRIAT!OM ENCUMHRAkCE EXPENOITINIt P4140 10. AOJ UNENCUM SAL PCT MRS PLAN HAS USED �� 41Uu 3ALAFIEi-Pr.4LLAk EMPLOYEE C - ""'` --• • r 4141 VERA-CITY COHTkIBUT:uM C Y 1 4142 FICA-C:IY CC'.inliJT:jN C Y � �;r4• -.-. iNa_IlITAL %jli�:l1SL 3i.RVZCFs. .. C J • T '• ♦ 300.C'. .76 29;.74 .1 rr •o•• ICTAL CJANUNICAITIANS c » t 3"0.:' .26 2vS.I4 .t r• 4US tNl%Tt%* N PLNLICM!" t u� •••• TCTIL PRIpf}V;•o'-'JRISw .) C 8D0.6C rOC.00 .- :a _.. _ _ 436. ANIN:.L CARL -- -- C ----.___. �.-. _ ---ST•SD.w __ —�. _ _--- - ._._.._._ __. -_,�.__. '? t 1.ns0.0c 307.30 2993 a ._- 4361 "IA4L PATROL SLkVIC• C- idol " N Y S•SC0.00 2.1+r�. 11 2.711.31 •7 - __ am�ZAL- J7UE& CZATRACT SEaV t---- r ••SS0.00 47.3 � 3.4S4.ST 3.095049 �'��ICTAL AMJuk15 ThIS L!VISI�,N C--- 1.650.00 3.O95.I5 49554.25 40.5 T Ile .f �F i +it _ 1984 CI3r OF JREN, 1JF1lJN "2! STATErgNT-3Y 0@JCCT AS 0i 9-30-84 PAC[ 32 E1 GENER—L FLNC 01V 41 ;hr.1'4U;:4G -- C@JECT GE$CFIFTI:A APPF3P•:3'1^►1 ENCUMBRANCE ExDEMC!TUR_ PR!JR ►C. ADJ UNENCUP SAL PCT NAS PLAN NRS USED 41UL SALtwIES-AEELLA& EM'LrlrLZ C ----- -- -} 2000 a •••• TCiel PER SONe.I :EItYICES C - -- R --- — r 2000 f 4SL4 •NG:'+E:RIkG AETA:NL° C— r 920.04 521.SC 39l.SO SA.) 4SU5 ENG:NEER:N( C(ASUL'I'j5 C r 4955c000 122.2) 4!'77.75 2.7 -.. ���• TOTAL PAOFf$SICNAL SCAVIC C !O.JJ • 49776.25 11.5 TOTAL AMJU%I� TF'$ EIMISIJN C • SlA20.00 643.75 4,776.25 11.9 20.0 f.. ! M u R a N u 1994 CITY CF CFC1C (CFT•JN '11 ')!VIS!0M•JFE2LT:NG STAT"MFNT-PY rPJ:CT 01-ENEA,.L FUKL OiV 41 5TRE. T CONST a "AIA' LPJECT C;S:R!FTICk AFFROPAI=T!OY EM['-,M901.14CE EXFEN^ITUAE P:<IOF 00. AOJ 41UU SALllIL5-AE(kL'A EMPLOYEE C 69239.t•6 r 1r9,547.�C 73•P42.52 4111 CV£FTIP.-AtGLLAA EMPLCYCE C 32.e2 T 5,630.CC 19091.74 411L SALAk:LS-T_-►P fhrLCYEES C 219.53 r 256.5: 4131 VACA.TILN•J► V (rA:G 987) C 1,115.42 Y 4,563.64 4132 FOIIDAi-Jll-liiO4--9sa) C 442.91 + 4133 SICK PAY cpRcf*-2991 .___- _ C 255.11 r 4,359.77 413: INJUAT►AY (FA,; 99C) C 496.b0 v 966.'r _61.41._fJLA•=ClTY CLNTF78UTInN c 386.47 Y 6,331.GL 4,294.0: _ 4142--SI CA CITY CCATRIRUTION C 636.52 Y 8,^AO.0 � 5.765.+54 - -Al5l-NOSFaTALl2ATlCh LNSUAAAICC c t ttti7.64 69326.10 _ 4152 -Lifer IaSUak&CE _ C ------ _ -- - - 4.16 - r 116.0' 87.F4 _'. �63 z3-�iAKJIAA(a L41LF _uAUAlLMCE -t- _ -- - -_---- - _ . � 13.666.00 S�2o4.R7 w___.�••aa_s*tAL_At9R904u-tE*VlC:tS Cso•SSs.1t.- r tS2,S39.o: t09.39�.t0 - ' V ' - 4210 OFFICE SUPPLIES V C 5.46 ' r 800.0c 182.22 422U POTO.1 FUELS A LUORICAN►S C I•' Y r I?,MO.oc 6.965.74 4221 CLOTHING 4 PERSONAL L1-' C '-- - -----` $5.40 Jf4 1 IIZD0.o^ 791.SD 4231 PL04 a 6ROUbES P6R SU► Ll C ., AS CF 9-30-94 ►Ait 33 ' UNENCLY SAL PCT MAS PLAN MRS USED ' 53S.S 35,7C4.49 67.4 61444.7 • 2.0 ._ 397Ct.2t 33.8 123.5 25.5 - 15t.5c-999.9 25.5 ;•,� 134.7 = 495t'-.64-999.9 510.7 48.0 w. locit.4P_-999.9 224.0 :. 49359.77-999.9 S93.S .. S6t.GC-999.9 2,C38.?C 67.S ,. 2,274.16 71.8 29562.9C 68.1 --28.16 75.7 19439.13 36.1 42999c.90 7100 617.78 22.8 a.ot4.26 s2.9 408.50 ♦ A 7,92109 19l4 CITY Of OACN4 COPTIC% ^7/ OIViSIOA-CFERATING STATEPCNT•PT OEJfCT 61 GENERAL-FUkO 01V 42 STREET C34ST & PAW CPACT OESCAIFIION APPROPRIATION ENCUMBRANCE EXOENCITUAE PRIOR ►O. ADJ -4I32 EOUIPUE&T-PARTS i ACCES C 1f164.15 T 89111tb.)o sfco1.10 -.4953 STAELT HAIbT AST. i SUPP C 49623.39 T 125r000.0^ 45#617026 494U R04K4 4 PERIODICALS C T 10. Gr ••• •- TOTAL--UUPPLIES•NAI11•ItEPAI -C 60393.0 T 1S2r0"0.0" 60fSb7.f2 430 C LEtAL-CCNSULTI►.+ SERVICES T 1f/46.5C 43US EbOIAIEEAIWG CCASULTIVS C 40.I5 T 199^0.^C 59434.60 43C6 CTr.a CCNSULTIK6 SERVICES C T 9BO.GC •••• TQTAL PROFESSIONAL S£RVIC C 40.75 T if500.=l^ 8r261.10 4321. TEIEf HONE C 4321 POSTASE C I MAC •••• TOTAL CONAUA:CITIONS C IClAL--FALAkIlbivkU&LI-9"AO C 133,80 19046.63 17S.47 13S.F6 --- - 297.41 A! OF 9.30•84 PAGE 34 UNENCUM BAL PCT MPS PLAN UPS NSEO 2,998.90 62.5 79.382.74 36.S 1c.aa9n.9 ,,•; *5 t 919412.18 39.9 . 19146. SCr999.9 �• 30534.60.362.3 W.00'•999.9 61761.10-550.7 f 423.37 71.2 7.9C--76.4- 197.41-297.4 100.00 297.41 197041.297.4 i 'A 4324 UTILI'IES C 122.54 �"� T 2.000.0!' 1r312.35 617.65 65.6 4323 STREET LtGNTING-�--- C - - T tOf000.00 3•�03.26 4f396.74 l6.0 •••• TOTAL UTILITIES C 122.54 ::vi. T 12f000.0� 6.915•SI Sf084.)9 S).6 1994 CTTr OR OPCNQ (CPT!CN ^21 0!VISION-OFEZATING STAT:r[NT-PT GFJECT AS CF 9-30-94 PAGE 35 - U1 ;E1�OA1.-T{ND _ OIV 42 STREET CONST 4 014INT CBJECT USCRIF114h APPROPRIATION ENCUMBP.NCE ExCENCITURE FRIOF ►O. AOJ Ul/ENCLP SAL PCT HAS PLAN Mos USEO ' 4331 EOUIIPERT t PAC RENTAL C 27.90 1` T 1294'G.GO 8,008.00 4•!92.CC 64.6 •R•• TOTAL KIN TALS C 27.90 r /2.t G.C^ 5.3011.00 49392.0Q 64.6 4141. PAINT OFFICE ECUIPRENT C 200.C- so.cC 15C.Z0 25.0 4341 PANT AUTJ ECU'EMENT C 271.7U r 3.OG0.7': 2.247.75 752.25 74.9 ----- c` 4342 PAINT RISC CGUIPIIENT C 16.50 759.40 14.7 4343 PAINT ELC61 4 (ROUNDS C 4M9.04 P9.04 •999.9 x. 4346 SPF;7/6-iLLl-rMeS CLAN U-- C •• T 4•�_C. 2•S60.JC 1.44C.CC 64.0 - u. ---- „ ' •••• TOTAL C34TAACI Mil*-4E°AI C 290.2C �^ T 7918?.3o 39C12.61 lows 4356 PCE.TIALS•C„NF-!ChOCL-- C T 3j0.::' $0.00 tl0.00 16.7 u . •.a •..• TOTAL JIMEA "0411RRCT 5EAV C ---.._....._. M. - - -� T 300..0 50.00 tS0.00 16.7 437u GENERAL L1011LITr iNSUM - C •� r T.l`Co.oO twbbb•7a " - 4573 EGUIPPINT FL761EAS INSUR C -� r 600.0C t17•DO 4574 AUTCHOTIVE INSURANCE C � "� r 2.970.00 i.40S.7S ws 4377 __ UMeAELLA LIMLITT IN5UR C •'� r 793.00 4374 INSURANCE AiENT OF RECORO C r 622.03 •••• TOTAL INSURANCES C r 4•S70.00 S•701.56 a6. 75-1 N.7 343.00 3601 561.25 S/•1 793.00-999.9 622.03-999.9 1 9137. 56-124.9 .f finis. ff : �6r - _ ... y ; a ar. . it;`twa 4�li6l.. J. _._ Ar�.-. '.t� � .�•�.' -_'; '�! .,+i k,:^.:: i�i[t. � •� � - � �., r • TOTAL MOUNTS This Oi11ISlON u' 1 ti r�—A rij 1 - 1904 CITY Of ORCNC 101:T10N ^21 OIC SIGN-OCERATINC, STATEMENT -PT QPJECT AF Cf 9-30-84 PAGE 36 - •- 4;1 OENtPAL #411110.-- -. DIT 41 STRE:T CONST a wtihr 1' UACT OtSCRIMON AFPROPAIATIOM ENCUNBPANCE CApEhOITURt PRIOR PO. ADJ UNENCUM PAL PCT NAS PLAN HAS UKO 4110 MtPOERships c -----mot• - 1; T "000 15.GC 35.CC 30.0 •. 4341 TRAVEL -MILEAGE -PARKING C r IJ0s07 15.3n l4.t4 15.4 4343 LICiftSES a TAPES C 14 r 10.0� 1C.C^ !1•1 • - 4390 CCNIRACT TALL MKOVAL�- C r 117CO.Q? 673.CC 327.CC 67.3 4391 TALI DISPOSAL CHARGES C 19205.CC 5.CC-1C0.4 •••• TOTIL 371-L0 C►ARGES C T 2.360.ic 1,S"8.35 451.64 eC.9 .w 479C FRIhC F0-IhTs.AFUND LOAM- C sD 8.470.00 • ' •••• TOTAL TiWfCRS C „ I -_�J+93-=NT aJIY- :NTEAfLYO LJAAS C _ T 3,424.00 30424.00 •••• TOTAL 7TALS OI::BURSENENTS G ____--- __ ..__� _.----._.�.—�_-_.- - �__---- --_ __r---�• T 39424.L3 3,424.00 .t Y 3619313.00 1�,seo.oi 20lr,T43s4S 1S10691S5 Soso 1,921-9 1984 CYlT CF CAChC 4CFT :JN ^_71 7jVjS!0N OPrAAT14G STATEMENT-I'T 0rJ--CT AS CF 9-30-84 PAU 37 Cl GEAEP-L rUkO DIV 51 rIJFLIC, HEALTH 4URSIN4 CFJECT OrSCRIFTich tPPRO)PRI&TI14 Nct?"SRLNCE EXPE4C I TURC FF 100 PC. ACIJ UhfNCLP SAL PCT MRS PLAN NM U80 431 FujjL.0 hiALTO, JUjtsjN; C 39775.J5 3077300C ICTAL PkjF4LSSI.)1J1-L SLRVIC C . ..... 30775.2.E 31775.0c TOTAL ANO04% Tt,:S :wisijm c 3.75.4C 39715.CC m ?7!o I 'flilwwp- .1 19A4 C! IT CF CRL.4 IOPTI" 921 OIVISION•OPERATING STATEN£N►-ST COJECT L1 ±ENER.L FLAL OIV 61 PARKS A RECREATION (EJECT wi SCKIFTi:.N APPRf1PItIATION ENCUM9R4A10E EMPE%OITURE PRIOR PC. AOJ 410C SALArIEL-REGLL-.^ ENPLnTEt C 19669.34 T 269IF3.00 169723.43 4111 -3VERI:.E-AL6LLIk EOFLOTEE C T S�O.GO 412L, SALar ILS-TFP. ;.MvLCVLES C 4S.00 T 4S.00 4131 VAL-':..t. rt1 (rrq;,ti 9L'11 C 226.34 T 19220.76 413.' FCL;; AT rAl tFkGG 96A1 C 101.17 T 46S.71 4133 S;CX Ftl 4rA;6 V49) C 30902 T 497.sF 4135 :AJLfT r9V (r%C4 9911 C T sS.2c 4141 :C6. C.* ITT C3tiTn:.iUT'JN C 76.39 T 1,466.CO 933.91 4142 F 1C.. CITY CC-%Tn:f UT t.14 C 125.42 T 1916R._' 10256.21 1151 ►O$�:T:LIIAI:Ck :NSUi-.ANCE C 134.21 If 1.20/.07 4152 LIF: 1hSURAACE C 1.10 T 1 3. CC 9.9: AS OF 9- 30-34 PAGE 36 U%ENCUP Olt PCT HAS PLAN NRG USED 152.3 - . 99457.57 63.9 19563.6 500000 45.CC-999.9 1922C. 76-999.9 465.71-999.9 497, 56-999.9 55.2C-999.9 5349C2 63.6 M 0 9 67.2 574.93 67./ 3.1C 76.2 4153 YORKNAbs C�KF 144W-44CZ C-_._.--.- T 959 00 4 91.72 467.28 51.3 _ _�a�w_T4Ti�..-1(ASONAI :.i�YiCEa t 7.4C�9.40- _ ------ T 22,909.56 4210 OFFICE SUPPLIEI C T rs.00 4110 ROTOR FUELS 6 LUBRICANTS C 96.04 "1 T t.4C'O.GO 19SSt./1 4121 CLOTHING A PENTONAL EQUIP C ?0.CC 4231 SLOG A GROUbOS If4R SUPPLT C J T 1 9 300 . E O 99864.44 69.9 23.ac 1/7.SM113.4 10.0a 49G.60 S01.40 3/•4 r1 1.71606 1984 CiiT CF :RLNO t:PTI)N '?! :;IYT5'J64 JrFQATIFOG STAI- WE%T-HT OPJLCT AS CF 9-30.0i PAGE 39 UI 441SAL FU%O OIY Ai PARKS A PECR=AT:JN CEJECT LLSCA. M .' h ►tGt^P4S4TSJh ENCUPRAINCt EKcENCITURF PRIOR PC- AOJ U%ENCUM eAL PCT MRS PLAN MRS USEO " 4132 i.OUIPM%AT PAAl, A ACCES L 2d•10 _ ___—._._� r 7,0.1r 131.23 31.23-1G5.3 v: •.•• TCTAL .,LPPLi`:-MiIN-PEPAi C •24.14 - t 3.4^5.:C 2,!23.11 b11.29 BO.d 4U. ` MAL•CCMfULTIhv SEFv1C`. 5 C r 4SUS COOMERING MOULTING c . t 2�O.Ot i9C.7� 430l-CT1+[A CCNSNtTIM •tR112C�ES C 600.0C � Y lra.00 .19 ' r dao.00 roO.Qc x •••• TOTAL Calm "r. lNs [ sQ.0 .19 4i.2/ 1.6 M a 43l2 .A;kT,Ar, t c4blr.:Mj446 c 2.72 r 50. 2.2? _. 47.7!_._ 4 04 ease TOILL PAINTI&G-PUSLISM-AO C ` r 5Q. ^ 2.22 47.70 404 1 •••• T01A1 uTiLI11TTJ _ — c ...--__ _. _____�____._.----.-•_---- A•SG •� 7 1 S0.00 70064 71.36 32.4 4331 COUIPMCAT A MAC RENTAL C 360.00 �•' •••• TITA. AEMTALS C 360.00 3 A3A1__11AlYI-�4tI�.EYU1P1.tNT r 7nt1.00 6162 JAIII-j%1 300.W 437973 237.13-21l.1 J W 4A.4t 31.2 y pw� 4 -1 r r, 1944 CITr OP Cam t9PTION 02) DIVISION-CPERATIV: 4TATEPfN7-F-T OfJECI AS Cf 9-'0-e4 PAGE 40 01-69 KRAL ♦UI►0 - - *TV i/ PARNS a RECREATTok OOdtCT OEOCRIPTICN APPROPRIATION ENCUMOR.NCE EXPENDITURE PPIOR ►C. ADJ UNENCUN 8At PCT NO$ PLAN HAS USED 4343 ImIlT 4KC46 a GROUND$ C MOW - T 1s0.00 E90.36 74C.3e-593.6 `-.---_•++R TOTAL CONTRACT RAIN- IEPAI C loser): r KO.00 1048106e ll:.be-22L.0 GAS I" dOiit aECREAt104 PROGRAM C lecococc +++• TOTAL OTREP CONTRACT SERV C r i,C�O.Or 1,600.0- 4370 OWAAL LIAOIL ITT TNSUR C 4371 PRoPTRTr IASLPtKE C 4s.`L 4S.00-999.9 6J?3 CUP AMT PLOAIEAS INCUR C SO.CL 24.CC-148.0 1 4374 AUTOMOTIVE INSURANCE C r 43T7 UIWELLA LIAOILITY INCUR C r loses:, IOC.00-999.9 • 4379 INSURANCE SOLI or RCCOPO C s1.to 71.20-999.9 •••• TOTAL INSURANCES C __..._.TOTA{rAR�IM/R7i,-Tal±•,4"4sVM W_t�.1al.i— ", r 61.17l.Od tl,s07.1s ►631.es T1.T 1.71i.i iJ 1964 «xry OF om:*f onpr/�* ~/^ "/vxsxo% apc"x,zIw *YWrEw,~ov 011Jco AS cF 9~30~84 pu6E «» - m «E*Ewxu pwwo om vI 9,w,v^'x cpJoox ocwcxxpn'w A~eptivs 1n:v% cnCu~mwumcE cnpcwnxvwa! pw!n" PC. xoJ uwEwcow nuL poI .' HAS nuwm wwm USED ' ^uox LoGa~cCwnokrx,6a wExvxos C - ---'---'-- v v,ovo^+, 1,57c.9n~991^9 «xuS -iww*,?4ZE1'/wo cvusULrxu6 C $n«.u» ---- ------'-------~ v ., - m 3037.n1~n99.9 , vnvLL Pmo*aoo1,;%-L u`wv:c c xa*.ao - -- --'- -- ----� ° «,,vn.vv *,rVr.9 1-9��� ' = Imvuu wMOmoVm 161* Ejvxj%ON c ~ n *,vo7°91 . ' ^ ~ ° ^ , ^ ~ . = ,- .. » ' �r----- — m }'` .. . 8 ` ^ ...^�.. `~ . - 1984 CITY CF CPCNC C^_PT!^N '"21 02VIS!0N-3Fc:PbT1V.: -TAi[PtN1-PT CFJECT AS CF 9-30-84 PAGE 42 p C1 :LNERAL FUND DIV 12 CONTINGENCY CBJLCT 0-SCRIF %rlw Aypp�.PRIATION E4CuMBRANC[ CNpENO:TUR: PRIG• PC. AOJ VNrNCLP PAL PCT HAS PLAN HRS USED 430E CTP R CCNIIUL1iA6 SCRvICt$ C 3 9227. 7 C-999.9 •••• TOTAL GAjFLSSj;%AL ;; RVIC C y 4142 FAtATIFi 4 FWLICH!ht: C Y 7•'`53.:5 7.f5!.C5•999.9 "••• TOTAL 104IA1TIRO•IVOLISH- 40 C Y 7�OS3.CS .L5!.05-991.9 43NC PEPS:ASI.IPS C Y 490.yo 49c.ac-999.9 _ b ••.• TOTAL OTHLR CO^aN[t C 49C.se-V99.9 " K• 4S2J.Oytt,p a4a 4 SSOKIMB C Y 2. 2.'85. Cc-999.• .- r 4• T IA.OS A.17t.6•.-999. 9 .��.'+. •••• TCYAt. CAPITAL -'J!LAT C3•S1S.�► _.�i .� Y l.S73.ti5 i.S27.[.i 999.9 +..4u FEpAWkT 1aAAK:A OUT C r f/.�4.,;0 S7.e04.00 J •••• TO:AL 111441WEOS C r sY.A1o4.oa f1'.N4.se . 4900 C @►I t I N iEAIC i .-.. C S ,�` •••• TOTAL OTHEP OISRUASEORENTS C Y 2119200.11C. . __. _ _ _ 20•QII4.00 _ ,'� r _ TOTAL . AUDL k L JAa i ." Y IS 1 UY _. C _ — A - 19414 CIT1 QF CRCNC t9PTI7N C21 btVT9T)N•OFfA+TING STATir'NT-BY CEJ:CT A- CF 9 '0-84 PAGE �3 U1 r.LN[RAI. FUND WV 13 SAC CHARGES PE004IT SURCM6 ~ tQJLCT GLSC*IFTICN APwRO►R!-TIDN EVOCUPBRINCE EX7-NC:TuFE PF:0- /C. AOJ UM:IICLN BA- FCT MRS PLAN HAS USED --486U SAC C1406(S REOITTE0 C 2.I,,3.,S T 11.917.:' 310-77.0'-999.9 _..-4161 Lltw F-k14 SIFCr.G R%MTD C r 5•452.0,3 59452.13-999.9 1 u.. TOTAL :.TNLR CI MASEMENTS C 2.1, 1." -� T ST•.?9• S 37,415.t!-999.9 T"TAL AM,jUNTS Thl C:V:S:CN f 2.1:3./S t 310419,63 371119.6i-a99.9 MAL ANOWNTS THIS FLOOD C 1269171.6+ S•tSi.3 _ .._� __. _____. t 1•a2S•�73.JG 1.211ANt.•71 `5.•C:E.71 69.7 44.4e6.6 -- -- 1964 CTII of ORM I01011011 C21 0IVI310W UFLRATIMO STITE.1NT-51' OPJ•CT IS Of 9-10-64 PAGE If, T1 1,36UCA OPOAIf Af FUND Div 00 LIQUOR SICAf COME "Wa Mick APPROPRIATION INCUP6RINCC IRPCNCITURC PRIOR 1[. ADJ UNCOCU. DAL PCI HAS PLAN Has USED RION NLAAICS-RIWIAA rMFLOT[L C 3.564.25 432.0 T 11.161.'0 ]F.C25.31 16.!59.69 69.4 1.518.0 C9UT1*[•A4{LlN CMPIOTCC C 1 10.51 1C.51-999.9 1.0 _ _- Ni► MARJ,6NIRP IMILCTCIO C 416.11 207.0 T I4.000.0- O.12C.66 7,279.12 AM.0 1094.5 _.__atat-OACATIGM ART 410 D6 vall c - 599.11 10.0 v 7.193.39 2.133.19-999.9 301.0 40394MILWI Pal IRA06 9AAA c - 205.21 21.0 v +.'26.2[ I.C26.2c-999.9 ts2.0 - -.lUa QG FAT IIA(6 9991 6^1.A2 604.3 b999.9 92.0 fT6JM PAT 164c4 999) {. I 16.JF 16.71-999.9 '____N1f AORa1S1AA111L .ii INJU -.j-_ _. .. _ _ 627.LC ' f Ir10►.Oc 1.MP1.00 626.0C F5.0 scu•CITT mulaUI10N-. C--._ _.. 1UD.66 T 6.rA9,00 1.C"8.16 1.24C.56 70.6 T I.M.6a 11180.33 416.61 N.t 364.23 - - T 699MN 1.1119,99 01/411 6a.9 '•fi-.L1R6-• C --�I.CA 1„ t IN.00 114.46 19.11 9i.1 a..�I61r 16660MA6.YY1(66 f 9H.60 s 671.23 -b.Jssj& 6101.17 64.1 f al.Na.N 10.111.36 18,900.66 ►1J w6 rr rcT .M.l.� r • RN.TO I66.r6 111.1i N.6 )♦ FINAL 6PlAU IN6 SN,"I's ( 96.N • L-•. r 2.f0'. ybN1 a.N NJ _' 61.1 p96 F 6.6M11 AA. -.Of 6, .00.00 46.40 _'. ✓ rT.rS 717.I1 N.1 IRA CIII C, ORCNt ,OPTlow 02) OIfISM- GICRATING 3TATIPM-PT ODOM AS Of 9-M-84 PSt2 11 LIWJR OPUNIAS FUND OI+ tU LIOUCA STCRE _. COJECT OISCRIf13CN AMPOPOIATION INC UANRANCE EAPENOITUNE PRIOR 00. 804 rENCUP OIL ACT MS PLAN Nr U199 4a3Z COUTPAEAI FARTS a ACCIS C T 3.14 3. 14991.9 . • aL aU NODAL a PERIODICALS C T 290.00 :sa.a0 ••.• IDIAL SUPPLIES-MAIN-PEPAI C 96.64 T 3.110.00 1.229.26 1.524.14 37.9 43VO NUOITING t PIrOC1AL C T 1.1ts.00 1,601.00 47s.CC-162.2 ------- •••• rna PNornatNaL lcmc - c + 11125.00 1.406.00 as.0c-142.2 - - - 4/10 takwo 2 C 56.21 ~•� -- ----- --- - f T20.00 440.72 259.27 64.0 -- 4321 PM•att C .� -- + 130.0E 29.59 10.41 2N.6 _.__.___ - .. ._e• •P,• TOTAL COMMNICATira 54.21 ..� f SM.00 400.31 320A9 59.4 -.-.-... _.y2S.Mfl[1NC,.l1MUCNINa-__-2 -;;� f n.00 sso.0a iaai 1Le.a A _._4523-AONSAISSINt - -C f 1,7N.Of •-aA-S63K-,03NS3NaNWOL1L1•e0 L- - t /,2q.r 4324 OTICITICS C T 3.w.a -.... lol., .1411tH 1 RJR �• J•M• . 1.MDA1 4111 IIKt r rntlN7 MC TAL c i-- la.aOO.r • Ta/R RT.L.,, t 1.012.e1 1,1aZ.77 404.49 3,1tt.3T 04.61 LMt.3T 1. ar.r 1,2.P.r 197.16 r.a 132./2 M.O 2,131.61 "A lR1� t.T 11 A3 A.t P� y :• l.ra.N Ad 14.4411L.r - ---- t1.,14.46 - --- ---S n4.M --M.a- --- - - 5 190A c1II OF ON CMc top"" on OTI1IITON•MCRATIN9 STATCKNT.0/ 094CT AS OF 9-50-34 Post 0,0 00 Ti t1GDOR 01?AT116 FUND --OR No. AI01MM *lot -- -------'-'--'-- "-'""'- COACT DESCRIPTICM Ae000POIATIN tMWONANCE CVCOOTT00C PRIOR 00. AOJ MENCUP OIL FLY MC PLAN MM YAM 1342 MAIM MIGC 11411MCNT -C---- - - - --"'--(' T SM.00 0.95 252.05 1e.0 4343 SAINT +LOGS A.MOIIM4._-._ C__ - xel.0e T 1.I00.OD 1.259.49 5I.4!-101.9 5, • -...A TOT" -CCNIRAC/-IMIN.RPAIC. _ __ 357.51 T t•700.00 1.570.95 313.CT 91.0 {!f! CONip.OAL P/0K091p C i 144.00 70.0^ 10.CC 50.0 Y AM NTA PPJCEIII►t 0 ++� T t.OSbOC 99{.{5 11155.55 15.e ___ .... TOTAL DATA MCCC00IM- f 1.190.00 991.45 11125.55 41.0 ' 6356 1KIT1M0-C/M-RMO o C AN.M- x{C.92 159.C. 40.2 --= .... TOT" O7 Mto CONTRACT NM C 609.00 210.92 559.0e 40.7 - "TO ACKAAL-- T OeS.00 446.40 256.e0 AS.i 1311 GAC9IAIY LANAMS--t . ' T 25.00 n.aD zco-lae.a 4,379."IOM0119C.1N3Wi C -- - ------ --- -- - - - - 26.00 2A. aC-9n.• -� x,009.oa 100.00 ° ------ f 1.500.06 1.0{l.N9 _. A.7L• ueuucc ••••c_n._.ccnw_c--- Y :9A.m ., .....i. t•G. .. wr.... ... I, • f,110.00 2.611.34 ': 43e0 KMIRSMIPS C 1.900.00 5.0 45e.11 T7.9 206.09.990.9 x.550.61 50.9 1xS.00 50.0 s?.�.;.; - 1994 CITY OF ONLY] IOMTIOM CIA 03YISfON OPERATING STYTCNENT•BT OPJECT /S OF 9-W84 MN[ !41 M 11 lIGOOY OPIX/TIN4 FV110 DIY 90 EIOUM STORE CBJCCT UESCRIN1ICR APPROPRIATION EYUNMX/NCE EXPENDITURE PRIOR PC. /OJ UNCNCOII MOl O[T 110S OIOM IIM{ 000 T 2CO.:T 93.15 106.89 46.6 43411 LICEAfL3 \-T01p-- C �� T NA. S I600 $011 o{.O 4361 DE FREE TAT 1.MAMORT11tl10o C Y �1 GlfS UN[Oa LEt)fa -01,11CMO/CIYROt C ^; ---_u{90ENLN. CRAGS f--__ c 5 Tw AL_Olout-c MIT& - c 1 STA.O^ 291.15 21Y.F5 55.6 , 4939 61PE0 IMPOOTEMEMT! c ' T 500.0E 50[.0c H{O MMiC[ TWq•PI/7.[W1R C 1 T W0.[7 99.91 2C0.c9 33.5 T 1.000.0] TOLL "PITOL SITLRT c T 190Y.00 N.91 1.iE LCG 5.6 — _ 1 r • t Y } r c /.Oj • PtdFD9.f..ia/1T-. I . HO.F '. �W I 1 • !s..; - t J M 1944 C111 GI 2q C1O IOPTIOM 021 OIYSSION-OPl Re TIME STITCPdMi-:'r OPJ(CT l5 OF 9_50-$A PSL[ Ljt 7/ Ll LUCF dlglllLe FUMO OlY 90 LIOUM STIR' • Nt0 CNCO{T CStO OISCOYtl [[► [ 157.09 - i 13M.C1 401.07 110.93 67.e t N.99 IOTq OTN[0 OI MY11f[Nttit [ ... -_- - ....___.. [� 1 T IrI00.GS SH.07 11f1 L 67 .8 N 10TSL MOUNTS INS$ tIOISIM C 113fiD r 171.010.0[ f3,l11. 17 37,lollol 6y" 703.0 r 6.641.5 --.• _IOTn.MOWIa?M{LiM10. C -- r 1iS.O1s.00 fj,f"n 7//. 17 37,3eY.a1 H•>" e. eels M .. a ITS CITY OF 0414C C (OPTTA 011 O:VIST04-CFCRATIMG STItEP!NT-PT OBJECT AS Of 9-3"4 PAGE 1/0 Ii VATEA JPEAATIKG ♦U'10 01V 91 VATER CEPAMTPCM' _..... COJECI OESCFITlICt VP,"AI IT O9 E4C"P0e4 MCC EXPENDITURE PRIM PC. AW UMEMCGM OIL PCT INS FLAN HBO USED AIOU SAIIAIES-AESGI.A EMPLOViC O 2.622.59 a13.3 - T 42,49v.G9 21.396.57 21.102.4! 50.3 1.161.1 4111 OVEATIPE-MLGLLAA EMPLOYES C 14.4c - -1.0 - I 500.1c 163.76 115.22 T2.4 412U SALIRIL3-1EAF ERPLCTEES T 25.^c 46.32 21.32-115.3- 1131 VACATI JM PIT (FMOG 931, C 347.45 T 2.252.C9 11252.C9-999.9 4132 MOL.OAT PAT IFMOG 7.31 4 146.92 T 461.7t l41.77-949.9 4133 SICK FIT (,MCC 949S - C 6.12 I 339.75 319.75-999.9 6136 CTIE4 PAT IFAC4 9901 C T _.... 4139 A011[445111ATIVE SERVICE C IS2.LJ - - -- T 699.50 616.00 137.10 74d ,. ---NU PER' CITT CONTRIBUTION C 15t,61 - -. V 2.917.:C 1.593.27 9.313.73 54.6 -.. _.4342 FIG. CIII CC.T.IVUTI3M C 100.11 T 2.236.00 11P56.11 fAtlr.01 47.2 _. ____4/0L.6NNii 0.itA I1 CY IMSUA"Ct-. --_ 149.46 -.._____.. ________.- •. t 1.27R.:" 1.341.53 371.a7 7b4 s _ 1 121.00 r1.06 A.92 75.1 •••a.y00kIIN5 Cuts r 1,959.00 1.426.00 $7.46.10.5 �'. -- 6_UTAL. RL44011AL �LRY{CIL C __.JR733.2Z -_--.. 24, 1 32,744.60 31.203.14 20.1- 16 N.3 1044.2 _. Q10 OFFICE SUPPLIES C T 100.00 4129 00100 FUELS I LUBRICANTS C_--_- - 1VY.Altt.. T 1.100.00 32.41 93.19 1.167.84 67.31 32.4 611.16 64.9 4221 CLOTH&*$ 4 PCRE0114L EQUIP C Ia." - V 305.00 I12.94 172.06 $5.3 1981 CI11 OF CBCNC tOFTION P21 01YISIOR•OFCPATING SIAF .f 1-Fl CEJICT AS OF 9-10-96 PAN , ^� I 22 LATEP JPQ.IIAG i99D OIY 91 WATER CE'r AAT 1FMT - _. _- . _ _- COJCCT OESCR1F110M APP. OPRIATIOB ENCUMBRANCE E1-E9CITURE PPfOP 10. AOJ UREMCLP PAL POT MS MAN NN OW / 1231 BLCG A GAGORCS PAR SUPPLI C ..--_._. I 2C0.00 40.15 1S9.A5 20.1 1232 EGUIPPELI FARIS A ACCES C 65.J0 --- --__. _- ^� 1 1rCC0.00 381.99 615.01 39.5 1231 UTIL:TI 31SIIN NAINT SUPP C 519.95 7 5.1e5.00 21111.51 3.124.42 42.8 .. 4210 LOOA. A PERIODICAL{--_- - C T 25.10 25.CC .. _.._ «.• TOTAL tYNL1E{•Y1N•IOAI C- 111.4C - / 1029.91 4.296.0F 46.6 -._.-_ ___ _.. UOY AY[]T1RF L PLAM[pl C r 900.00 9CO.00 100.E 4303 L[IAL-CCNSL! 71-.S SERVICES C T 100.01 tCC.C' LN3 [NIAC[R IAG C(NLYLTiN C r 1.000.07 1q.00 eft. cc te.S - 13N at111L cERNtT3N surlcu c T 3w._o 5so.co - .----------------- .... »rYa PTlorcaulwa a[ar:c e --... ---- ---- - --- .. r [.3N.00 1.04•N 1.241.00 H•t -..__._...____... LAY 1[tONON[ [ 13.26 Am$ PNTAOI .... TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS C SS." •r. 10.011 T N.N $8.00 US SLIMS [ 409.12 I$.MAP 11.883.33 4.716.67 N.3 1964 CITT C! OOONO CCPTION Ul DI9ISTON•OPEPATINa STATE/CNT-9\ OOAECT as LE 9-30-84 PA" � - 12 Na7CA JPCNRTIK !WO DI9 91 WATER OEPAATKNT --- COME OESCRI/110N AA.ROPAIAT39N ENCUNORANCC E6lCNCITONt PRIOR P0. AO.I YNCNCLN RAL ECT NRs PLAN On 0390 .63a9 STREET L16N1I66 L 1:234.15 1230.73 1.27E.73-999.9 T •••• TOTAL YTILITIC9--- L 1,661.85 1Z022.06 3.0/.94 ----'- 79.3 -'-' T 16.000.^.0 ., U3/ OLt•RE,T a PIC RENTAL c 125.°C .� T 125.aL _ •.•. 70tAL RENTKf L 125.CC 12S.OL r 636N NRINT OFFICE tO0IPKNT [ SO.CC N.a6 3.54 92.0 T ' UN RAINS ONTO COMMENT C 622.52 If930.0E 927.96 7.La 966 ROSS GAINS P1fC COOIPRCNT ' C 1.0Lo.0'. 130.65 369. 3S 11.1 4363 PAINT OLD$$ 6 MOWS C 100.0; S.13 25.20 74.80 25.2 _ _ ---- ---- _..-_--- 1 4363 GAINS WATER RAM. 6 PLANT C IS0.90 -__i. 6000.00 1.314.61 50fl.3i 14.9 •P•. TOTAL CONTRACT KtWPC►A3 C 765.42 2.114.40 _- __ -_.. 6.739.12 -24.2 ' - -. _4312 La613•ADNIA SIR9I6- G--___ _.-_ f00.00 .. $9.34 466.R 333.30 ONd T ... U13 CO/AlEbOAL AAOCLN300.�----tLOR-. ._ _. - _- ---- 9.9/ 141.41 a.C9 eA•, pAli.660CLi11![ L \ T00.00 -----21.66 .---- ---- $04.14 195.3E PT.I .-__•••.SITAI-6AfL3A0C[LitA16-__ __ - a36.7s 69.2 ^ r t,n2.6D 9n.a 173.00 73." 72.6 .•-4316 METIKO-CM9.LCNOKS L am." \ - 059 IBEO-60oi KNICEI O 19'an.42 12.092.37 - 6.491.63 M.6 .. -- 1 1964 C1T1 Cr ORCNC ICPTLSN '121 0)T!SION-JrCA.TING STATEMENT -FT ON-Cr AS CI 9-30-84 PAC t w CI \A 1[A OP pAT iAG �UNO CIA 91 JATCR [LPART PCYi I COJLCT Ji S[A1PTi CN RPPRIPNI•TION CNCUR6AINCL CNPCNOITURk PRIOR Pa. AOJ UNCN[UP DAL POT 1ws PLAN NM vm .... TOTAC O1NC1 Cry TRACT SCAM C T 191630.0^ 13.^67.3r 6.532.63 66.7 I 437L GLMA1a LIAP11111 INSUA c T 111.CC 9^.T.19 196.49-122.6 - anl PRC.:rRIT J6SLAINCC C T 21J.v HC.O: 47C.cC-262.9 - NTI 941110MY PLOSICRI USLR C • T S.lu 5.40-999.9 - 44/6 AW4,14TI9L INSLRANCC c I T 525. U 112.-5 119.C5.229,2 U►{.YMR[LLA LJ.ACL:TT IASUR C - -- r - r 95.:'. RC.C" 5.ir 91.r Alr{ tMWRNC[ AaUI If •,cnw c _6• P i 21 r.1) 12.15-999.9 tOTII IA{URARc iS c r 1 I.C9,30 2. 112.1r 1.)0).21-192.5 P qCY 11[1C!A♦NI►1 [ M r. i u69 NARLN2LCAM.wAMtN{ c :. A 200.0C 19.61 — _ — _.. 961.T1 9.1 -- -- { "02 LIU%K$ 6 SAM C - 6' .AA. T6T6L {1M6 CPLAN C - 350.00 IS1.22 _.--19C.iC--1C.7—_.---____._—�••� .. I ♦ 710.011 tN.w r -__—tl1a.A6tw6uNL1sYJMC•'S '— —._ _ -_ -__sau.rs _- _ T 1.AM.w 9.6or.ao a.wl.6aus.6 � _._A9.n eT.r. o •IrLLaI • T {{6.w 1{6.w ',_ .... uAY_WILLJWnw • __—J.12J.H. ___. - _ - - � •_ .tol I WON." 9.AOT.60 3.197.40-1 N.a • 1961 CIIT JP DLCNO IOPTIIN Dl[ D:Pt SIONW CPD11TIb0 3TLTTPINT-ol CNCCT 1s IF 9-30-I1 OAK J+ s I It 1gCA aPCS1'1141 qH0 Oil ^t JLT[L OVALTHNI - - • CNLCT 07SC[Ii/Ick APPIIOPLIITT,. IMCUNSASNCC [AIthD:TUAC PRIOR PI. ADJ UhCNCUP LAL PCl NM ILL■ h00 um +� • • I •••• TO1K IAINtILI! C __ • T 4.346.30 104I.CC �• 1 , • LHD WAFWDS L 11[!.4UQSi,N,S C T - „t In 1 -- • KSS ILI CAP-tLtLAPINO 1o1N3 c u1 • Is1K 01nU LIL1MSCh[tts C s• v 1. 317.C4 i.11 l.00 '• IOTAL YOUhis This OIVISIX C 11.534.90 216.3 t• T 126,120.,,C 1947103 II0C1.71 0.I 1TI81.2 • I• ICTAL lftt kl: IBIS PUNJ C 11.534.1; 216.3 • v 126.129.00 29.02T.23 U.101. i1 I2.P 1064.2 ...• I 1964 Cns OF AMC BOOTED" Us OIVI9t ON•OPE6AIIN6 STATEMENT-6V OBJECT Af OF 9-30-a, 016E 7y w • 19 SE KR JOE6ATIA6 IOMO DIV 92 SEWER CERRIt1ENT COACT 'RIFTICO S90RONRIATIO" ENCUMBRANCE EXPENDITURE PO ION PC. AOJ WHEREON BAL PCT MRS PLAN MRS USED • AMU 9AL.. ."CELIA& ERMLOTEf C 4.091.00 351.1 _ I S2,199.0c 40.191.49 12.60.51 76.1 1.433.9 • • 4111 OV'.'..E-RCfuw EXPLOTL- C 1 I.S00.O^ 621.03 611.9E 54.) $0.0 • • 412U SALAMI'S- RAT ENPLCIEES C r $0.00 21.39 26.el 12.9 1.? • • 4131 VAUII.L FIT I9A0A W1 C 611.66 31.5 1 2.413.54 2.1I7.SM999.4 293.0 • • 4132 9CL:JAr Pal IPA06 9461 202.03 21.0 _. r 1.311.3/ t.c v.11-94v.v 120.0 • • 4133 SIC[ Pal (H(6 VAT) C 6.12 T 396.44 '.9 L.,b999.9 46.5 • • 1136 Oi ILR PAI 'PAC. 9961 C a139 AOX1%ISTMATjvE $:RVICE C 163.0". 1 T10.0^. $N.00 1111Cc 25.2 • • 4141 TCRA^Lilt ED1,11IbUTIUM C 241./1% .. 1 3.66S.CL 1.179.70 E6s.3C 26.5 • • 6112 TIC. C:TT CO.T.Ibu1l1N C - 269.35 T 7,Nt.00 2.273.66 311.11 as.$ :,• • 4151 Nf SMITAL;JITICN I"U%AMCL C ..-.-__ ._. I42.16 _-_ ____ __ _ -- --•" 1 2.2M.90 11639.4% 6se.ss 71.6 ..• • 6152111E 164"AACt c _.__.__.. ____ _ 12.3A-. - --- -__ ___-_ -__�__.__•• 1 148.06 111.06 3694 NA �• • 1 _ &III NDMAMANS CUR' ASSURANCE C-.- 1,398.21 71.19 95.3 .� • 1 -y.._IfIY.Pu asu JCRV1CL5-_-C-__ _ _-._ _._ •_Y2.20-- aw 1 N.Oq.N 9.172.28 11,118.12 Nd •' •' 1710 9P9IC[ SUPPLIES C "�• •, T IN.00 43.84 56.16 bid 4220 NET" Futt6 9 WBA2CANTS C 111.11 Ps •.'�'�T,j: �rr I 2.2N.00 1.430.31 369.69 03.0 UZI CLOIMINf I Ppl"AL EQUIP C - - 2102 T 321.44 264.26 44.16 80.1 maim m .S8'. �.• a .- BAss ABM. ,--, -or 146a CI1. OF .PEN: IOPT9M ilt o1YIS•04 OPr1AT19N SIATEN(NT-P9 08UCCi AS Of 9-l0-64 qg __73 &EVER iPCD.+11A: FUND 019 12 SEWER OCPAAt Pl NT OJECT OESCMITTICM uPPCPDIATI9N ENC U4811NC( (VENCITUNP PAlOP No, 104 UMENCLN OIL ICY MPS PLAN OB USED 4P, -Qtl ELCf 1 .101ACS .11 SUPPLI C iO 1 33.e7 33.(1-919.9 ... -1Ql EOU IPM(AT YA9L t tCCLS C T 1.150.EU 216.22 916.13 2.533.41 26.6 • 6t34 UTILITY $15ST6 .mthi SUEY C S.if 1 1,5.O.CL 62.47 1.412.2C 5.5 1 •••. T014 3UPPL{if-IY {M. AEP1{ C 411.76 9 P.s+).o: t.767.37 4,1CP.43 36.5 7 - 000 MOXI968 6 iTO6NCIAt C v 1025.eC 1.125.U0 1DO.0 0 • 4303 LEGAL-CCOSULIIN IIOgtts C r � . 4SU3 EN113EE61W c-i-sa TI110 C 1 ld]0.00 2.64 S.O1 50 S.0t-160J .�� . 43US CTPt1 CCN6YLIIAf IQlICTS C r 149.25 NS.2 s-991.9 n� O •• .• TOTAL PA2PIOlt OEL IENIL C •33.,. - -may • 9 11625.CC t,C15.26 1,391.21.153.0 1M0 1tLL/NCMC C 65.01 4 P10.00 497.94 .. --.. IN." 65.1 177/ PMT16E 230.00 - 6?3.15- w• TOTAL CN1100IC lls" C 65.07 ! I.660.80 - __ •-••3.09 _ 1Y3 . •c_LWiSWPl4.- C- __ 9 10.00 157.03 B.OYt1t.1 T 10.00 1f7.05 Ll. B.t/1.1 "{-- oil _ VT ILl nc� c fn.tS ------- • I /1Pt1♦O•N O.pt.tl 2.911.01 i3.t or .... TOTAL UILLITI(I C 191.25 t 11.800.0E 4.059.91 2.961.03 P3.t -Y--+-- YLl I", fill OF JAON] $OPTION 521 Ol Yi SI OM-OPCNA I]V'. STRICMENT•YY OPJ•CT AS OF 9-10-ta PAGE . .0 Silt' tR•r•Tl.i RUNO OIV 92 SLYER CEUYTOENT gJ(cI UL SC. I0II am .. "PROPAitliON ENCU MRN u.CE EVENOi TURF PRIOR It. AOJ UaENCUM BA/ ACT HAS PLAN "as vita • h $fit COUIPIIRT t PNC RCIRAL C �. r LTO.Cf 545.Cc 455.UC S4.5 - E] .... TOTAL SCNTALI c r 1.^_:0.1, 511.dc 455.CC 54.5 5 b 4I40 POINT VPKC CeBI/KIIT t [;.^ ..-------- ----r AC.00 56.79 1Y.79-142.0 h 4341 SAINT Safe COOIPOCOT c 162.17 � 1. ----- --------------[ 1.150.90 1,114,6I 11.1T 99.0 -- 11 AS" SAINT SAsc Ctt IPRC1IT c � _-I AcO.Cc 252.55 S67.67 29.0 i) a)al SAINT Stitt a MON/( c 3.95 t1c.co 10.10 119 `0 20.5 I] Uaa SAINT LIMI-LIFT 8141I046 c 398.00 O _ --- -_.____. _._ r 22090.c. 4.20.4l - _latt)... 1 .• 1•' .... TOTAL CONTRACT MIO-RbAI C 1.164.02 24.730.00 1.645.02 - 1aMa.9S t(.9 I) - AJOI Leu tAOS IA 649peL-._..c- _. 21.10 ;2 If $91.00 5lo.4c 184.46 eat __�aAsi COW tpt•o•A BMtt8631se-;-- --- -_---------- .. _ _ :5 T 111.011 a... Ode N.) - -atte-NU PWCRital -- L __---- 11.44 1� T 1.4111.01 1.050.46 IM.14 /(.a J ••"-MAL 0•tA JNOtta►1 M- 6 _ 91.P4 -- SJ . 7 2.1Te.ca 1•627.40 N(.tt Pe.( Osa RctiWhIW.ecMeelO C r Ttt.00 $5.00 145.118 ns 2� � r CM.00 51.0C /41.ec no ] A)� o/e ttNafL uanrtr TruA c -- --- �.g • J1'1 UT) RNUIPO[NT ILOAIERS /tt0a c 194, [ITV CP CR(AC 10F•I5N -21 DI9TSION-OPOTATITIS ST•IT.r NT.RT DEJECT •s [P 9-50-/1 PAGE :S SA.cR 'FIR.T1Na TW.D OT9 92 SCNO KPAATK4T f NJLLl Of SCRIFIICY APP.1PRIMIN LOCUMS-IKE UPCMCIIURC PRTOP Pa. AOJ UNCNCLP PAL PCT PAS PLAN NH USED a/la u ICRGTIVE INSLAAK, r 1.S.CC 906.95 111.9)-219.{ aSi1 UPPAULA LIARILITT ;NFUR C T 110.Cc t1C.c^ 40.CC 1S.1 ad F! INSUAANCL AGERT OF ACCCW C 1 S41.01 141.Cf-999.9 .... TCIN-1o.WabCc. f r 1.920.it 1044.46 1"', 'tr_111.0 1396 1[PURSOM c T %0.Oi S0.Cc 1 us1 iliGotL�oKUN�G1aSNM c _..- 9 YN.O^ 15.54 174.40 18.6 alA) LTcCNS[1 S UM c 9 Sol 1.I1.IILt 4199 W[YLCCIS CHCRS/CNON t t +� qf/ Mcf f4491N lPA611 t /1dN.15 :0 t 1,1.11../t uo.N1.H aa.»e.i1 n.o aew nlcc t /99+0.00. a.a1.a1. 1.1».11. no a)•1 o1Kh{PA1S9[ NF Laos S w I 1.NLN 1.N7.H x.. to7M NaTS1 SNaMp S 14.641.30 t ISI9NI.M 31 1H N/J00 N.NLH 11.1 Also SSILOSMS a 8/awc7WS t 010 a0ToM11N SMSPROT f 5.541.21 _—.._1 __.—a.aM.GC — .__�_H.OS0.1►-.— — bM1.0►.9H.�- 45H OIKP 9"IFN\t C ISO.DD- '.., PAP. iHY qII/4 So1UT t 1.141.71 'aft M-N.a ' 1994 Cul OF uaJ IS iLYCe OPIMIie, I@.O COACT OCKNIFTICN ICTII eNOJNT; Tn1S .uNO ,OPTION 02, O2SISION•OPCNITINS STCICNINT.eT CMCI AS Of 16SO. Se PNK i OIP 92 SIUCa DEPARTN41 .. APPNOPR I'lle" CNCUPe01NCO C➢PCNOITUO[ PRIM PO. SOd USCNCUP W PCT MS SUN Nq 020 I T 310.266.39 29.054.O0 22S.71bN 93,149.10 SO.S _.—CWJ 36944.6 1: 2 a� �d Gi �. I 19A, CIT, CP :A(%, IOPTTON 021 DIVISION 9KAATIMA STATENENT-eT OIJECT AS OF 9-30-e4 PAGE !9 • I, GOLF COURT "EPAIIMA IO DIT 93 GOLF CEUASc --- -- - -- -- '" --' -- --- CBJECT OESCAIPTI(N AP•RSPPIATION EMCU.6MANCE EPPIENOITURE ►MIOA NO. ADJ UNENCUR SAl POT MRS PLAN MRS USED -� 4100 SALLAI(S-AEGLLM EMPL9,i( C - 1.923.34 --- I60.4 ---? T ie.5.2.00 14.271.4% e.5C9.95 69.7 1.539.e , 4111 CNEATIPE-ALGLL-R CNPIOTZE C -- T 50.CC sC.00 , 412C SAt Ai IDS -TO. E.P,QTEES C - 1.GT2.0! 353.5 T e,I90. 8,4e1.51 30E.45 9e.5 2,0e9.e 4131 9AC4TI" EN 1PAOA_eA11 C -- 52.56 T /51.1I Ill. 11-999.9 60.0 4132 .OLIJAT 041 'FICA, 4AA1-.. C- ..- 103.1, T 515.55 515.53-799.9 t0.0 ab 4133 SICK RAF LORCA 959) A 1e.30 4.0 --_r T 142.e1 142. e1-999.9 1L0 13 113e CTNER PAT IPPCG 99S1 C - -- - I • 113s AOM:.-,"TP.LTIII SEP7ICE C 3S3.OU - - -. I ros.00 7N.00 +.oaloe.l • 4141 .EAA-C:TT CONTRIBUTION C - -10.10 - '1 1 1.40.00 GARS/ SOLN 41S.7 • 4142 FICA-C:TI CGRT.:AUTION C -- - -145.11 - - T 1.1,e4.00 1.3e7.H SSfM73 70.1• 1151 NOSP:TALIrAT;CN T 1.3e140 Nt•3{ tH.IA M.7 �»� 1152 LIFE I"URA{E( - ' ------- �-10-----�-- ' --- 9 13.00 9.N 3.1e /16.3 ws A133 .OAAMYt.CU... INSURANCE-�4. _--------- ..- -- T 1.Nl.N N3.0► f1.H 9{.A r N919!•N 339NA.73 e•736N T9.1 sd{1.2 A21U LIFICE SUPPLILS _-- C- - -- T 1611.00 $0.90 110.00 31.3 .• -_ e279 NOT OR P0[LA A LUZ41 AA"S C 1.964.13 139.91 93.E QZ1 cL01RS MA ' PU 30NRL [QUIP C .40 -• 1 150.094 yo a..e $1.60 65.6 , �5� 1 - t All 1994 CITI OF OEM! loot3oN )11 OIT:]t OM-OPt AL1.9G SIW1 4T-el OeJCCI AS OF 9-30-96 PASC y IL 6CLF CJUM.L Lf CMN:Mf. 10 OIM 13 GOLF COURSE -----.-_-. CGJECI NESC6IFTICK 6KP0►P IITION CNCUMGMLNCE a PCNOITWR PPIOM Pa. N0J UNCNCLO NIL ACT MOS PLAN MY WO 6231 FLOG 6 GPOULCI MLR SUPPU C 116.92 T 3.236.0' .^7402 1011. 21 65.0 6632 EGUIFMELT PART! L 6CCCS C 1.79 I 1.000.0^. 932.1i 6109 93.2 u.. tOTAL SUPPLIL!-M6I6-PCPAI C 217.19 1 6.510.CC 5023.66 1.466.54 r7.2 630U 6VO:T ING O FU6NCIPl C T PS.CO 450.00 11S.CC 66.7 - •••• TO/AL PMOF[aatONll SLGYIC C ' r 6y.0^ 650.0 225.00 66.7 - 63aU 11L[►NOG[ C 176.16 ,- __. _. T 11200.07 939.99 360.01 70.0 ' • 6A/ 91ST149 c T 50.00 13.39 36.61 26.9 r •..• IGTGL C061 lC&T6ONS 0 1F606 T 1.210.0c 853.3A 396.61 66.3 1 - --------------- -- • ---Ana J*941166.9 JEWLIC111NO- - C T 600.00 26C.^^ 12C.00 HA c 469.55 ' r 1.200.Cc 1.L99.o5 299.13.12G.9 V- _ `_--•PP�21i6L-Nir[[YWUNISN.fO C 66I.5S ---_ _ r f.600.01 1. R9.01 17b OS•171.2 ' 6314 UTILCTILS C In.c+ L' r 3.000.0c 1.536.61 1.463.19 51.2 " • IOIY Yilllli[! C 11. Ad••• r 1.000.00 /. SSf7.tl61 f.L6].19 31.Z J N•' 6131 12WIPMCPT 6 MAC MCNTAL c 6.6s3.0L 5+,� �•.. TOT6t OINTALi C .J ..-__6.6OO.OL-_-_. _______ 6.067.70. 1 I.GW .00 F� e � j5« •6 .t, Sl t.tl 48401 $1.1 lv 19Aa Cfly of OR CNC (OPTION "I 019ISI9N-6PEMATtNA STATEMENT-R OBJECT A3 OF 9-30-84 PA" N la GnLF COUP!, &PIRATING TO Div 93 6GEF COUPLE -�'—�- CSJCCT CCSCAIFII:M APPROPRIATION 90CURBRANCC EXPENDITURE PRIOR 90. 104 USCNCUP GAL PCT MRS PLAN NO VGED 4342 RAIRT r:SC CGUIPPERT C T - 1.200.00 13.63 1.646.16 /46.16-177.2 --- 1• • 4343 RISNT SLOGS a WON" C T 1.2S0.00 SAMS 1,902.34 652.BF-151.2 n.. TOTAL-COTRACI MAIM -a CPAI C 3,450.00 1,121.34 6.060.22 61C.21-112.7 D T R 63S6 191TI%AS-CGE7•2CNOOLA c .._ f IOO.OE 10.0' "d.00 10.0 . 1 n6R TOTAL STRIP IMPACT SEAS C 10.D0 9C.0c 10.0 .9 T 100.V - 43Ta GLNCA6L LEABILITS INgq __ C w0.o: 1,SO3d6 CO3.1.26-300.6 - .. rt • 6371 FROPEAiI tMOMCC __..____ C 1 93.0E 111.0p 22.00-127.1 • 6373 COUIFI40T FLOAICRS tMOVA C _._ T L 100.10 ay.00 . it.00 9.0 • __--_- U76 AWCR0111I I9itNARCE --- -_----- C 7- - 277.ac A.Op 2aa.CC 11.9 • 63/7 WIRMA LIABILITT t%SUR C " -� 1-----350.00 IOO.M - _.--0s0.00 26.6 -- ~8 43F1 DRAM SRO► INSURANCE C J' 6379 tN61MUNCE AGENT OP SECOND C _ T ___-_..___-_ __12S.N - -- 121.66-999.9 --____ --.—•� O •••. TOTAL INLS9ANCtl C 1 1d22.00- ---1,924.42-- —SO4.42-13S.S I- aun .. C 1 725.00 44SIJAAGELe - 1 50.00 1 17f•00 v.. it 225.00 100.0 f•12 ._—-_fS.OS 9.S 12A•00 100.0 1961 (lit IF :RCSC ICPTIJN ^21 O:v,5SOR-JFEA4TIN6 STATCRCNt-OY OBACT AS O9 9-30M84 PASC �R 74 GOLF CJUAG: OSCR_T:p CO OIV 95 GOLF COURSE '---" '--- -----------� - ' 1 CN.F/CT JESCAIFIl:6 APPROPRIATION ENCUNBUNCE CRPCNOITURF PRIOR N. AOd UNLNCLN BAL PCT IMO PLAN _NM USCO 6599 DIME. C•.PFi[ C CTNLA 041k:LN C Y 599.30 - 555.97 45.06 NN.7` - - --� ''1 4511 W"VEeaTS TI LAND C 10S.071 1CS.0[-999.9 r ----•1 AUG NU ILCI66: A SIFUCTIIALS 2.50C.CC r 7.500.00 ,a --NIU OTPLR INPN09LPCNts- C 45C.00 „1 r 450.00 ------•;/ N/N ADTt110ME INUIPMENT C r 4564 SULR LO0t9PKOI C r )50.00 456.52 511.6A 56.4 •••• TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY I r 3.100.00 543.57 3.156.68 14.7 4•A• • •, ouuw6tR-NNN Lttl --- r . 1 Y5O RLIAh." A AI IXOAMW 11L611 T ri . M•. TOOL IYLI0L✓rFMAl11161 A-C r C T"I INTEROFFICE MEWUNVI< MEETING DEC 10 1984 DATE: December S, 1984 TO: Mayor Butler and Orono City Council CITY OF O R O N O FROM: Chief Melvin Kilbo SUBJECT: Maternity Leave Policy I am forwarding for your review and approval a proposed maternity leave policy. My secretary, Mrs. Bobzien, is expecting her second child in June. A research of recent ruling and other department nolicys show that this policy is in tune with current municipal practices. Council approval is necessary as the Orono Police Department Rules and Regulations were also approved by Council. ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT EFFECTIVE SECTION DEPARTMENT MANUAL DATE NUMBER Dec. 15, 198 100.84 DISTRIBUTION1 RESCINDS TITLE: Maternity Leave All Personnel Permanent fulltime employees shall be granted maternity leaves during the physical incapacity of the employee. The use of accrued sick leave is allowed. After all ac- crued sick leave is used, vacation leave may be used to the extent the employee is entitled to such leave. After the employee has exhaused all accrued sick leave and vac- ation, the leave may continue on excused unpaid leave. However, during unpaid leave, payments to hospitalization shall be made by the employee as required, to maintain coverage. Maternity leaves of absence shall not exceed two (2) months duration witho.•t express permission of the Police Chief. Employees returning from maternity leave must furnish ev- idence from a medical doctor that they are capable or re- suming their duties. OPD 072 3/ TO: City Council COUNCIL MEETING FROM= Joan Lattin, Assistant Finance Director DEC 10 1984 DATE: December 5, 1984 SUBJECT: Comparable Worth study CITY OF ORONO The Minnesota Legislature passed a local government pay equity law earlier this year. The new law requires each local government to develop a pay equity plan (comparable worth) and to submit the plan to the Department of Employee Relations by October 1, 1985. The Metro Area Management Assn. formed a group of city managers to interview three consultants that could provide a comparable worth study for the local governments. C.D.C. has been retained as consultants. We are looking at a cost to Orono of approximately $4,900 to $5,000. There are several features that C.D.C. is offering that will assist the cities in this study - an evaluation report ranking their specific employees based on a comparable worth study, a benchmark study which would provide evaluations throughout the metro area and should a city create a new position they will re-evaluate that for a cost of $5 to $7. I have attached a copy of the memo from M.A.M.A. regarding the comparable worth study and Chief Rilbo's memo. INTEROFFICE MEMO 84-172 DATE: December 5, 1984 TO: Mayor Butler and Orono Council FROM: Chief Melvin Rilbo SUBJECT: Metropolitan Area Managers Assoc. meeting on Comparable worth I attended a meeting on December 4th at Brooklyn Center Council chambers. This meeting was to discuss member cities intent to participate in a study of comparable worth sponsored by MAMA. I indicated that the City of Orono would participate in the study. DATE: November 21. 1984 TO: All Managers, Administrators, Elected Officials III L5 @ CS OM�ga .� FROM: William Joynes ,i i!I Chairman, MAMA General Labor Relations Committee Com�11 �j� II )I RE: MAMA Joint parable Worth Study 11LICLITY O- F NO As many of you are aware, three months ago the Metropolitan Area Management Association undertook a project to determine whether or not suburban cities could jointly produce a study that would comply with comparable worth legisla- tion enacted in the 1984 session. At that time, we asked cities to indicate whether or not they would be willing to fund on an equal basis, our investiga- tion into that possibility. Some 57 communities agreed to do so at a cost of approximately $200 per city. We estimated that amount would be required to develop our request for proposals and to screen various consultina organizations who might wish to bid on such a joint venture. Our desire to approach the study jointly was based on two reasons: First, the historical effort that MAMA has made in comparing wages and fringe benefits, and the success we have had in keeping their levels consistent in the metro area. Secondly, we felt that it was preferable for all MAMA cities to have used a com- mon approach in the event that future litigation occurs. We are now at a point where a committee of managers made up of myself, Bob Thistle from Cocn Rapids, Jim Miller from Minnetonka, Jim Brimeyer from St. Louis Park, and Jim Lacina from Woodbury, with support from Labor Relations Associates, is recommending to the 57 cities the selection of Control Data Corporation Business Advisors as the vendor to accomplish the job evaluation study mandated by State law. A summary of the proposal is attached for your information. At a December 4, 1984 meeting of MAMA managers and administrators each of the 57 cities will be asked to indicate if they prefer to continue jointly or proceed on their own with a separate study. To help cities make that decision, I have attempted to provide more detailed background information on the screening pro- cess, the rationale for the selection of CDC and the anticipated costs for the Joint approach. SCREENING PROCESS We began in August of this year by sending out a generally worded RFD to 18 firms locally and nationally who had done job evaluation work in the private and public sector. We received ten responses from the initial request. After a considerable amount of evaluation, six `Irms were selected to be interviewed further. They included Haye Associates, Towers -Perrin -Forster and Crosby, Control Data Corporation, Arthur Young and Associates, Hewitt and Associates, Hellcrest-Craver Associates. Those Interviews were conducted in October at the League offices by the RFP com- mittee and members of the staff of the League of Minnesota Cities. At the conclusion of that process, three firms were felt to merit further scrutiny. They were Haye Associates, Towers -Perrin -Forster and Crosby, and Control Data Corporation. It was felt that Arthur Young and Associates and Hewitt and -2- Associates, while providing a viable approach to job evaluation, did not present a system that would fully satisfy the requirements of Minnesota law. Hallcrest- Craver was eliminated because we felt that with their staffing and current Com- mitments, a timely product might be a problem. After that interview, the RFP committee developed a more detailed and specific RFD, copies of which were sent to all interested cities. The three consulting firms were asked to make a second presentation which took place on November 6, 1984. Invited to that meeting were all the representatives of organized labor represented in the MAMA communities, representatives from private employee asso- ciations and any managers or administrators who wished to attend. At the conclusion of the interview, the selection committee was unanimously in favor of recommending the CDC system. The CDC proposal at $345,000 was, admittedly, the most expensive proposal we received; however, the unanimous feeling of the com- mittee was that it was the one proposal that we felt would provide the best and most legitimate results and wo,.�d .,e the most easily maintained system over a period of years. RATIONALE FOR DECISION I would like to briefly discuss some of the thoughts.of the committee regarding the selection of CDC which I hope will explain why that choice was made. First and foremost, the Control Data Corporation proposal offers to do job evaluations on all of a given city's positions. We originally thought the cost of doing such a study to be prohibitive, and had suggested in the RFP that an evaluation study that included 25 benchmark jobs would be more appropriate. CDC bid that benchmark study but added that for a nominal additional charge, it would be a simple task to do all of the positions in all cities. CDC Business Advisors' computer capability makes the extension of the study to all individual positions in each city, a relatively simple matter. The other consulting proposals did not offer that capability. A very strong argument for the selection of CDC was the extent of the data offered as an end product. First and foremost, after the study was completed, CDC would provide each city with an evaluation report ranking their specific employees based on a comparable worth scale. In addition, the. MAMA rities would receive a composite benchmark study which would provide evaluations throughout the metro area for those jobs which were similar. An example would be that a city would be given a relative point value for the position of patrol officer within its own organization, and would also have the data to compare that point value to a metropolitan average and to specific patrol posit ins in neighboring cities. This was felt to be a tremendous labor relation -personnel tool for all cities and something beyond what we thought we would receive from the comparable worth study. Another very attractive feature of the CDC proposal was its ability to be updated. Orice the initial study was completed and in place, the system would be able to provide, at a very nominal cost, adjustments over the years. For example, if a city created a new position or added responsibilities to an existing job, a new questionnaire could be filled out and submitted to CDC outlining the tasks that position would perform. CDC Business Advisors would recompute the job evaluation rankings for that city and provide a new point value for the position. -3- Their estimate of what it would cost to re-evaluate a specific position or incorporate a new -0 the city, was $5 to $7 per occurrence. The other two proposals did not i „ h a capability. Finally, a word about the conceptual framework of the CDC proposal. Their job evaluation study is one that is referred to as a task evaluation approach as opposed to a whole job evaluation approach which was proposed by the other two firms. In a task evaluation, jobs are broken down into many small functional tasks and those tasks are rated and a point total derived. A specific job and its relative worth compared to other jobs in an organization is determined by the total of its task values. In the whole job evaluation approach, the job, not individual tasks, is rated on its relative worth in various categories. With this method, certain jobs may have an inherent bias due to preconceived ideas about their complexity or difficulty. An example might be an evaluation of a bomb disposal officer. Most people's initial reaction is that the job is worth a great deal because of the element of danger involved. When you evaluate the job on a "whole job" basis, that danger factor tends to expand into all the Areas that you may be using to rank the worth of the job. In fact, the danger in bomb disposal work may be present only once in a great while, and the majority of the job may be very routine and non -dangerous. The task approach eliminates this type of halo effect because each separate function is evaluated. In our example, the bomb disposal officer would be given fairly high points for certain tasks like the diffusion of a bomb, but may receive routine marks for other tasks associated with the work he or she would perform. The net result is to provide a more accurate point total for all jobs surveyed. For the reasons listed above, the committee felt unanimously that the CDC propo- sal offered COST OF THE PROPOSAL Many cities have called requesting to know the estimated cost per city of the CDC system prior to the December 4 meeting. At this time, it is not possible to give exact dollar amounts. Obviously the total cost to each city will be depen- dent to a large extent to how many cities select to cotinue with this joint approach. Additionally, there are some other factors that will influence the cost. There is a possibility that quite a large number of out -state cities will wish to use the comparable worth study that MAMA has developed. We estimate that 30 additional cities may participate. If they do choose to join us, then the cost per city could be reduced significantly due to the economies of scale achieved by a larger group. We have also been contacted by the Metropolitan Airport Commission, the Minnesota Utility Association, and the city of Thief River Falls, Wisconsin. They have all expressed some degree of interest in participating. While a firm dollar amount is not possible to determine at this time, I can give you a range of the dollars we are talking about if we make some simple assump- tions. If the 57 MAMA cities all agree to participate and the charges are based on a formula which takes into account both a minimum value charged to each city, and some factor for the number of employees, then the cost would likely range from approximately $4,000 to cities the size of Osseo and Minnetrista, to an 4- amount somewhere around $15,000 for a city the size of Bloomington. If 25 to 30 outstate cities join in the study, the cost range would be lowered to $3,500 for small cities up to about $12,500 for a city of size of Bloomington. CONCLUSION We have asked that representatives of the 57 MAMA cities attend a meeting on December 4 at 10:00 AM at the Brooklyn Center City Hall to provide us with a decision as to their intent to participate or not with the NAMA study. We realize that some cities will not be able to make firm comaittments due to the fact that their councils may not meet before that date. It is my hope that with the information provided you will be able to give us a good indication of what your city intends to do. A similar meeting has been scheduled for members of the Coalition of Outstate Cities on December 19 at 1:30 PM at the Golden Valley City Hall. Those of us on the committee have spent many hours involved in this selection process. We believe that CDC proposal represents the best option for us to meet the requirements of State law and will provide us with a personnel and labor relations tool which far exceeds what we expected to obtain through thi; pro- cess. We strongly recommend that member cities join in the study. Metropolitan Aiea Management Association C•.,mpensat ion Study Process Summary The plan for development and implementation of a FOCAS (Flexible Occnpational Analysis System) job analysis a^d evaluation system for 25 benchmark jobs defined by the MAMA C,-�ittee and for subseq—it evaluation of MAMA member citier n-benchnark jots is summa i below. FOC. sestionnaire-based job analysis and evaluation system., AS has been developed to provide accurate and comprehans_ie information about jobs to support effective human resource management. The first step in the process is to develop questionnaires to be used to gather information about what employees do. We will use one questionnaire for each nccupational group. The MAMA Committee will identify one subject matter expert and an advisory group fror each occupational group to work with Business Advisors. These individuals will provide their job content expertise throughout questionnaire development and job evaluation, and should be very knowledgeable about jobs in their occupational area. Business Advisors, together with a team of MAMA member cities' Personnel Directors, will develop preliminary questionnaires based upon existing job descriptions and the Business Advisors data bank of ta.k items. The Personnel Director team will identifv and schedule employee workshops to be conducted jointly with Rusinec� Advisors, to modify preliminary questionnaires. Questionnaires will be finalized with the advisory group for that occupational area. Second, Personnel Directors will schedule and conduct meetings with employees for thep to complete the questionnaire for their occupational group. In filling out questionnaires, employees will indicate for each task that they do or do not perform it and how much time they spend on tasks performed relative to other tasks. Third, Busines- Advisors will provide data entry from the questionnaires an'. provide computer -generated position descriptions for each employee who filled out a questionnaire. This is a listing of tasks performed with time spent percentages. The supervisor and employee will review and verify or modify the position description. The Personnel Director team will collect and return all modified position descriptions to Business Advisors. Business Advisors will provide data entry and return revised position descriptions to the Personnel Director team for distribution to supervisors/employees. These will serve as final position descriptions. Fourth, Business Advisors will provide average, or benchmark, job descriptions for the 25 benchmark jobs identified by the MAMA committee. Personnel Directors will identify employees making up the benchmark. Subject matter experts and advisory groups will work with Business Advisors to finalize descriptions. The fifth step in the process, task valuing, begins at the same time as the second. Business Advisors will work with the Personnel Director team, subject matter experts and advisory groups to set up the task valuing process. The Personnel Director team will identify and schedule managers for valuing meetings. Business Advisors will conduct valuing meetings. In valuing tasks, managers will rate all tasks about which they are knowledgeable, according to one factor, complexity, importance or unfavorability. Business Advisors will review average task values with the subject matter expert and the advisory group to finalize values. factor weights will be statistically computed by Business Advisors and finalized with the subject matter expert and advisory group. The sixth step is to combine results of the completed questionnaires with task values to determine job value. Business Advisors' computer analysis will compute job value by multiplying time spent on tasks times task value and sum the products to produce a point total. Business Advisors will provide job values for the twenty-five benchrark jobs to the MAMA committee. Step seven is to collect and analyze wage and benefit data from public and private sector labor markets. The MAMA committee will identify available surveys and work with Business Advisors to define appropriate markets and to determine if a specialized salary survey is desirable. If so, Business Advisors will conduct a specialized salary survey. Final job hierarchies will be constructed based upon job values and market data. The eighth step is to analyze relationships among job values, current pay rates and market data. Business Advisors will provide an analysis and alternative strategies for addressing pay discrepancies. Ninth, Business Advisors will provide individual job evaluation points to the member cities. Finally, Business Advisors will provide a report of methodology and results and meet with the MAMA committee to present the report. klall2111 COUNCIL MEETING To: City Council DEC 10 1984 From: Joan Lattin, Assistant Finance Director CITY OF ORONO Date: December 6, 1984 Subject: Insurance Bid Award The insurance bids are as follows: League of Minnesota Crum i Forster Insurance Trust General Liability 13,414.41 7,263.00 Property Insurance 3,832.63* 4,186.00 Crime Insurance 898.00 570.00 Auto Liability 22,100.85 7,941.00 Liquor Liability 4,071.14 4,071.14 Law Enforcement 5,809.20 5,809.20 Public Official 1,236.00 2,691.00 Umbrella Liability 6,60n.00** 12,425.00 Workmen's Comprehensive 30,094.00 30,094.00 88,056.23 75,050.34 • This does not include boiler insurance. •• Crum a Forester will not write the Umbrella Liability separately, must take entire package. The 4:,surance premiums have doubled since last year, which we were aware of and the 1985 budget reflects this increase. The insurance markets have changed considerably this year and there is ru change foreseen in the furture especially for political subdivisions. Our agent is still trying to negotiate a more reasonable premium for our Umbrella Policy. I recommend that we award the bid to the LMCIT which represents a saving of $13,005.89. 33 INTEROFFICE MEMO 84-17' COUNCIL MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1984 TO: MAYOR BUTLER AND CITY COUNCIL DEC 10 1984 FROMt CHIEF MELVIN KILBO CITY OF ORONO SUBJECT: REQUEST TO PURCHASE SQUAD CARS HENNEPIN COUNTY PURCHASING HAS AWARDED THE 1985 SQUAD CAR BID TO ELK RIVER FORD -MERCURY INC. THE FULL SIZE FORD SEDAN CAME IN A DID OF $10,884.00 PER UNIT. THIS RID IS WITHIN OUR BUDGETED FIGURE. THE ORDER FOR 1985 SQUAD DELIVERY MUST BE MADE BY DECEMBER 20, 19S4 BY LETTER OF INTENT AND PURCHASE ORDER. I REQUEST PERMISSION TO PURCHASE THREE (3) FORD CROWN VICTORIA SQUADS AT S10,884.00 EACH FOR A TOTAL OF $32,652.00. WITH A CONSERVATIVE ESTIMATE OF $2500 RETURN PER CAR AT AUCTION, WE WILL DE WITHIN BUDGETED NET AMOUNT OF $27,700. I ALSO REQUEST PERMISSION T"O SEND LETTER OF INIENT AND PURCHASE ORDER FOR THE UNITS. Memo 484-75 3� TO: City Council lBDM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director DATE: December 6, 1984 SUBJECT: Uncollectable N.S.F. Checks - 1983 COUNCIL MEETING DEC 10 1984 CITY OF ORONO The attached resolution lists all uncollected N.S.F. checks from the year 1983. All prior year's N.S.F. checks have been written off previously. During 1983 there was a total of $742.63 in N.S.P. checks charged back to the liquor store. '., this total $571.93 has been collected to date. This leaves an uncollected balance of $170.70. Since these checks are now at least one year old it is recommended that they be written off as uncollectable. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 9a NO. s•s s A RESOLUTION DECLARING CERTAIN CHECKS UNCOLLECTABLE AND REMOVING THEM FROM THE VARIOUS CITY ACCOUNTS As of December 10, 1984, the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota hereby declares the following checks uncolIec tab le and directs the removal of same from the appropriate City accounts. Liquor Store Checks: Joseph W. Patten $ 4.61 Larry A. Schermann 19.49 Mark S. Kurvers 20.00 Janet Lea Lind 15.00 David Bromirski 8.59 Joel Zellmann (2) 26.43 Julie Tudor 5.10 Claude W. Burnaugh 56.81 Paul R. Menth 23.67 firms Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held December 10, 1984. Mary C. Butler, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, CityC er Memo N84-76 r TO: City Council PROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director DATE: December 6, 1984 SUBJECT: Transfer of Funds - Liquor Operating Fund to General Fund As per the 1984 Budget Revenue Source, the Liquor Operating Fund Of the City is to contribute S30,000 to the support of the General Fund. It is recommended that the following transfer be approved at this time. Transfer from Liquor Operating $15,000.00 If we have sufficient revenues the remaining $15,000.00 will be transferred in 1985. TO: City Council FROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director DATE: December 6, 1984 Memo 084-77 COUNCIL MEETING DEC 10 1984 CITY OF ORONO SUBJECT: Transfer of Funds - General Fund to Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund It is recommended that transfers of $20,000.90 and $17,604 be made from the General Fund to the Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund. The monies were budgeted in 1984 as part of the annual General Fund Contingency. The $20,009 transfer is the regular amount budgeted annually. The additional $17,604 was budgeted to be transferred in lieu of depreciation on certain general fixed assets. The transfers are to provide the necessary funding for the purchase of General Fund capital outlay requirements. This format was adopted for 1984 to reduce the peak and valley effect of capital outlay on the General Fund departments. Memo #84-78 ,7 / COUNCIL MEETING TO: city Council DEC 10 1984 FROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director CITY OF ORONO DATE: December 6, 1984 SUBJECT: Transfer of Funds - General Fund to Building Capital Project Fund On December 13, 1982, Council passed Resolution 41445, establishing the Building Capital Project Fund. The purpose of this fund is to provide funding tc replace the police quarters with a building within the Orono City limits and to provide funding for an eventual relocation of the public works functions, and such other future municipal building requirements as needed. It is recommended that a transfer of $20,000 be made from the General Fund to the Building Capital Project Fund. The monies were budgeted in 1984 as part of the annual General Fund contingency. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1445 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE BUILDING CAPITAL PROJECT FUND WHEREAS, the City of Orono recognized the need for adequate building facilities for housing the police, public works, administrative and other City departments; and WHEREAS, provision for annual additions to a Building Capital Project Fund can eliminate or greatly reduce the need for future bonding requirements. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Building Capital Project Fund is hereby established and further, that it is to be funded through transfers from the General Fund and in such amounts as stipulated in the annual General Fund expenditure budget. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on December 13, 1982, LA ' 11 William B. VaM Nest, Mayor ATTEST: A erta M. Strom, City Clerk Memo 084-79 ?e COUNCIL MEETING To: city Council DEC 10 1984 FROM: Tom Kuehm, Finance Director CITY OF ORONO DATE: December 6, 1984 SUBJECT: Transfer of M.W.C.C. Debt Service Credits - Sewer Operating Fund to Sewer Debt Funu 1966-1976 on August 15, 1978, Council passed Resolution 1931 which provided that the Annual Debt Service Credits from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (M.W.C.C.) would be receipted in the Sewer Operating Fund and transferred each year to the Improvement Bond Redemption Fund (Special Assessment Debt Service Fund for sewer and water bond issues from 1966-1976.) From the inception of the Debt Service Credits in 1971, through the 1976 credits, no transfers were made from the Sewer Operating Fund to the Debt Fund. The Debt Service Credits were transferred from the Sewer Operating Fund to the Debt Fund for the period 1977-1983 when the Debt Service Credits ended. it is recommended that the 1971 Debt Service Credits, in the amount of $16,334 be transferred to the Debt Service Fund from the Sewer Operating Fund. This is the first of six transfers to be made to relay the Debt Service Credits for the years 1971 through 1976. RESOLUTION # 931 A RESOLUTION TO CLOSE OUT THE METRO TRUST FUND TO THE SEWER OPERATING FUND WHEREAS, the Metro Trust Fund was created in January 1977, for the purpose of collecting the debt service and current value credits received from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (M.W.C.C.) F, that these credits would be avaUable to purchase land or for other capital expenditures (if it were determined that these purchases were permissible under the law), and WHEREAS, these -redits were depositer? in the Metro Trust Fund during 1977 and were invested and did earn interest during 1977, and WHEREAS, the 1978 credits from the M.W.C.C, have been deposited in the Metro Trust Fund through August 31, 1978, and WHEREAS, it has been determined that these credits cannot be so set aside and cannot be used for the stated intended purposes, but that the debt service credit is to be collected in the Sewer Operating Fund and transferred to the Improvement Bond Redemption Fund (Debt Service Fund) each year, and that the current value credit is to be used within the Sewer Operating Fund for reducing the charges from the M.W.C.C., NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: 1. The assets of the Metro Trust Fund on hand at August 31. 1978. (cash of 523,850.02 and investments of 0119,953.12) be transferred to the Sewer Operating Fund as of August 31, 1978. 2. The future debt service credits (which will total $22,265.30 for the remainder of 1978 and $55,717 for the years 1979 - 1983) will be collected in the Sewer Operating Fund and transferred to the Debt Service Fund in the amount received each year. 3. The past debt service credits (in the amount of $95,303) which were used to reduce the operating costs of the Sewer Operating Fund to the years 1971 - 1976 will be repaid to the Debt Service Fund. 4. The 1977 debt service credits and interest earned and adjustments through December 31, 1977, which were deposited in the Metro ':rust Fund (in the amount of $49,678.54) will be repaid �o the Debt Service Fund. 5. The 1978 debt service credits and interest earned through August 31, 1978, which were deposited in the Metro Trust Fund (in the amount of $'.'5,275.47) will be repaid to the Debt Service Fund. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held August 15, 1973. William b. Van hest, Mayor Attest: / -- alter R. s Clerk-Admin is for C� Memo 484-80 0 COUNCIL MEETING DEC 10 1984 TO: city council - FROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director CITY OF ORONO DATE: December 6, 1984 SUBJECT Loan Payment - Administrative Vehicle - Administration Department to Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund In March 1980 Council approved the pruchase of an automobile for the City Administrator. The Equipment Outlay Fund was to provide the financing with the stipulation that the Administration Department budget would repay the loan, with interest at 5%, over a period of four years. It is requested that Council approve a payment of $1,454 from the General Fund Administration Department to the Equipment Outlay Fund as the fourth and final installment to repay the cost of the 1980 Ford Fairmont. The payment represents principal of $1,385 plus interest $69. Memo 08;-81 VO TO: City Council ram: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director DATE: December 6, 1984 COUNCIL MEETING DEC 10 1984 CITY OF ORONO BUBJECT: Loan Payment - Tractor/Loader/Backhoe - Street Department to improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund In March 1981 Council approved the Long Lake Ford Tractor bid of $36,892 for the tractor/ loader/backhoe. This piece of equipment was purchased by the Ego rent Outlay Fund for the Street Department. As a condition of purchase the Street Departmen, to repay the loan over seven years with interest at 188 per annum. The Street Department did budget $7,244 in 1984 for payment of this loan. It is requested that Council approve the payment of $7,244 from the General Fund Street Department to the Equipment Outlay Fund as the furth of seven installments to repay the cost of the 1981 Ford 758 Tractor/Loader/Backhoe. The payment consists of $5,174 principal, and interest of $2,670. Principal balance remaining December 31, 1984 is $15,522. Memo k84-82 V/ COUNCIL MEETING DEC 10 19,4 TO: City Council PROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director CITY OF ORONO DATE: December 6, 1984 SUBJECT: Loan Payment - Dump Truck - Street Department to Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund On July 11, 1983, Council approved the bid of Minneapolis GMC Truck Center for a 1984 dump truck in the amount of $22,258 less the trade-in of the 1972 International dump truck at $3,888 for a net cost of $19,258. This vehicle was purchased by the improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund for the Street Department. The Street Department is to repay the amount over five years with interest at 9% per annum. The Street Department did budget $4,659 in 1984 for payment on this loan. It is requested that Council approve the payment of $4,650 from the General Fund Street Department to the Improvement and Equipment outlay Cund as the second of five installments. The payment consists of $3,389 principal, and $1,341 interest. Principal balance remaining at December 31, 1984 is $11,593. Memo #84-83 `1 COUNCIL MEETING DEC I 0 1984 TO: City Council CITY OF ORONO FROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director DATE: December 6, 1984 SUBJECT: Loan Payment - Sewer Operating Fund to P.I.R. Fund It is recommended that a payment of $5,000.00 be made from the Sewer Operating Fund to the P.I.R. Fund as the final payment of the $50,090.00 loan as per Resolutions t283 and l343 respectively. Authorising Transfer of $50,000 from 1963-54 Sewer Construction Ends M('A5A^, uhe 1963-64 Sewer Construction Fund createf: .�:or 63-6; IS-1 construction project has been completed and them is 5/5,000 romaining in tha Fund, and WNER:'AS, it appears to be in the best interests of the Village to transfer $50,000 to the Sevier Operating Pundl this transfer to be used to restore the $50,000 deficit of the Sevier Operating Fund to the General Fund until such time that Sewer Operating would be on a paying 'basic. NOW, TILEREFORB, BE IT RESOLUT9 by the Village Council of th3 Vlllago of Orono, Minnesota: (1 The arprocriate officers of the 7illaEe are hereby authorised to transfer cash not to exceed $5O,CO0 from the 1963-64 Sever Cop--truotion Fund to Sower Operating Fund. AdoptoC by the Village Council of tha Villa(;e of Orono st a reguler nceting held April 14, 1969. H. R. Poes, ayor ._ Attec;% eF ver�S ilam RES);L'TIOH dc�J�� A RF.EOLUTSON AP:'ROYTNU COInOLIDATION OF Cr.RTAIN CONSTRUOTION FUNDS BE IT 10FT.BY WZOLVED, by the Village Council of the Village of Orono, Minnesota that the following .anitary newer Construction Funda: 63Lt-1 8 6415-1 and 65Ln-1 be consolidated into c Fermanent Improvement Revolvirg Fund #429. This fund will be *aaed £cr con- etructien costa iwtil ouch tl.mn as a permanent financing is estat- liabed for the 9:"titular construction fund. '.;ken t:ne permPners financing is estebliehed, thn construction fund will ra_:aoare. :hc Permanent Imnrov-:+nent rovolvlmg Fund in the amount prevluaZ forred. Adopted by the Village Council of the Village o1 Orono, Nirnesota, at a reguler meet_ng held Jur;e 8, 1970. Lou a er queer, S�;ror -' "-- Attest• s pffiTi H. Bastin, erk-Adwi- rreior— 10Memo #84-84 , COUNCIL MEETING DEC 10 1984 TO: city council CITY OF ORONO FROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director DATE: December 6, 1984 SUBJECT: Navarre Weil Loan Payment - Water Operating Fund to Sewer Operating Fund In May 1979 Council approved the transfer of $9,710 from the Sewer Operating Fund to the Water Operating Fund for the repairs and maintenance to the Navarre area well. This transfer was approved as a loan to be repaid with interest. The fifth payment is due in 1984. It is recommended that a payment of $2,917 from the Water Operating Fund to the Sewer Operating Fund be approved. This payment consists of $1,983 principal and $114 interest. This is the final payment on this loan. Memo M84-85 COUNCIL MEETING TO: City Council DEC 10 1984 FEOlf: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director DATE: December 6, 1984 CITY OF ORONO SUBJECT: Navarre Water Tower - Loan Payment - Water Operating Fund to Sewer Operating Fund On November 22, 1982, Council approved the transfer of $27,800 from the Sewer Operating Fund to the Water Operating Fund for the costs of painting the Navarre Water Tower. This transfer was approved as a loan to be repaid over ten years at 10% interest. Provision for the third payment was made in the 1984 Water Operating Fund Budget. It is recommended that the payment of $4,642 from the Water Operating Fund to the Sewer Operating Fund be approved. This payment consists of $2,443 principal and $2,199 interest. Principal balance at December 31, 1984, will be $19,544. 4 NONE LISP OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR MEETING OF December 10, 1984 COUNCIL MEETING DEC 10 l9i4 CITY OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING , , 7TV :MS T 11 2524.2: 21J=75 5 LIT L E° •C 11 315?*16 252=SS FTAMM T 11 2524e22 211935 UcLIEK .1 11 2524.?? 21J=35 H1 T"L'c4 J 11 2524520 21J=35 T )T!L __!05 T:` L r TO'AL FICA TAX nn J.c c 01--M=LIYE95 FI:A A = GRJUO grAL•+ 9 a PMTiIC:llvc M::LTM aLLI C HLUE y )3SIj�jr Sd:CL) 0 • MEJ:C;L C:VTTi >LA'! = vcUJcNT:AL F = CO)'0. 474�Tl C=iE M:'.%EE TA i'.: N TnA4:S--17=::A ,::_ H:'1KEcT L:F: .1 MUTUAL .Eq V::-S M = NUT034L )F ,1A+: L = EMeLll.'!S ME'l EFIT • = ACTRA IJ a SICKO.cr EITEL * Li A.UL ^F CIT::S C = ME40F 4kl4T A^,C-. M'SSIN4 M:S' CJOE FOR 31M-_ :M=LOS C7-�T• '-V=.1' r A r afrktraoEtiD /a.��61! r-T-, - - - F'PL-H+ SL.;7 : 9S IA33.+5 '.i] 3.1;14 J3 +1 1146-.51 "765% S•.?F:.i j4; i; 93 11970: 921% .5T.V`_..3 AG 93 1094." SJf.J'1 -- 1 1.'S"07a 412.93 * •.L ZTK 25 1C4a'2 1797. 55 ^T U... T9r11394= TAIO ...45 Tn'AL '1"57 Ak--L TOT% F; C4 TAX GAT; = 19.6T5.92 rwrL7T:P3 FT A = GPJJP 4LALTH M = PfriICIa41S HEALTH �L=1 = M=J:CA CEITEt TU': L _ P3U JE A':AL F - LSJ'7. HEALTH :pe_ , = MI.11?37'4 14J H TnF'A-]MPo If!A ,CC. I a HI'AEHS L:=. J a MUTJAL K % •OTUAL JF 1441A L . LKPLC Y i'S 9E4 CF:T M = AETNA N NIC"LL:T EI'EL C LrAJU'_ `F C:TTES Z * MLALTM CAR: 114;91T A::T. M:SS;N.r Mid= C)OE F0ft S)KC .POOLS ::Tv .F _-�, .. 3 7 �RtryPee/eo cAD 1001009� 7• .. . Fi PL •^•: 73 "i 3-V 51)L :?)i" 7F/}. LO 413-QC34 3L 7t 26)46.*2 L197.53 a3 12 421,35.46 '.27.45 9i7Z:r1 :3 I 14105.59 511.74 R%•'Kti ='1; JF .t 153441,S6 111S.i5 c.""-_i_-. .) 31 12h64./3 1143.44 C-JIS'i JJ +? 15924.73 4. As.54 _s r,za :p S1 ??757.73 1133.•3 )L 3J 1.197.11 4Y..SSl F '.•'IL:° eu f1 17 1 S-FFSd. u"- fr '245r.•7 165.:J 42 77+91.G5 1314.Jd 5t6 ulcT J^ 4? )Sh91.79 �22.24 54`FF:T645 -F it 27343.13 13S1.41 )4 12 laY?9.:6 1KS.J5 'C 42 2:/22.44 737.50 H3 "•'J' ;J S1 f-46.:4 143.52 Ja r1 22Y1, a7 41.15 K:JJS TA 1� 1SV99071 i6:.•.4 J.Z p' Ti S3 ?S161.46 )2°.455 J>r'Jr rJ 7" 2559.04 )..' J)M'? "I S1 1i564.4) 1.65.65 K:Ln^ " S5ee1.52 1L1s ,24 KID./C: K••)'L. I t I S'IG .79 665.43 K;-01 vM Ii 3:-25.11 1235.21 L.77• J: 15 17193.F6 7SS.a J3 3; 25219.44 1174.Olt v:..._L Y J' 1t69.>? '3705 a: J. 41', r )', 2512F a i I +' -I I.)3 41119C27`:1 J 3' 27245844 1J55056 FT S1 17521.79 F"6.)9 v^-� •L 12 362;@71 $95.75 jr, LE S1 a'15.1? 53).`) ?L L+.ro -d 31 ?45. 76 ).:) o: A. 5)J 'C 31 2> :51.46 1145. 53 P_T"i$J9 cY 95 V3976 ).)) __9Y jr N 7799i .47 1)55.43 PR'w) I 17 z947.oe 7?.76 9v:.i .4 7t t?169152 161,+1 a)1 CaW +1 161, 1C 7.') 535: JJ 42 2Je/7.55 035,44 VLLNEY % 91 1121.77 ).)3 SK c..•, 15 41 L.e 6'. .VI +5:.53 do -� ' pel CITY Of oew :KCe e91Ien0 - 1i•/FN MIL /L.:1M t' . - CM[CSSOx _O+r� L+]u+r 9[1069 Cull Ks=PT]M fCCOYIA M. _]OW. 0 P.O. 9 MMM C•.•i AS002 I2/061N 30.38 pl +Sacr2ma n■r [mar Rn4 3NIt1- - 12/C6/M --- H.Se- -- l I I ■ p" SISTER - TELEPHONE - -- - 01-1120.019-12 -- "-'• T 315e11 12106/91 r.S11 a I s t Tire SYsnN TELEPHONE 01-5320-019.14 1 ' ASJ 11 12nalm 19.rr a I I I I,re SYSTEM TELEPHONE O"520-0.19-15 As.,I 12/39494 I0.S3- 3 1111 tire A3TE11 TELEPHONE 31-4320.129.31 XL 11 12/041e4 31.53 a T a T INOO SYSTEM TCLEPHONE 01-1320-1 T1-53 C Asia I?/ IS4 _ 39950 L T I 0 life STSrEN T!LCPHMi 01•4320-249-42 JlSitl I2/39g1- r52.19 a I a T pre SYSTEM )OF COUTI O1-1510-109-II - - . Sisal 12/Ya/e4 e.18 L I I I T49 SYSTEM TELPNONE 72-4120-1N-91 C 3151011 12/G44 10.9r a I L M tiro SYSTEM TELEPHONE rl-4320-Sa9-12 911.SS JLSYI• 121i6rN 39M.23 "1 STAY ELECTTIC "I RISC iO la 01-1312-249.42 390.23 ...••• •..-CM3 F nS.19 Itl:aAl $2.38 a90C1 SO%.HUC! el u9r0M COOT OI-4151-129-31 $2.)9 ••...• •••.CMS • 1lLaJa, 1N.00 ".CT)+Tit L SON; N,r OLOS/SM0. 11-LfU-C99-11 69.:0 . .9•••• •.•.CSS AfI 12IC6/91 •--)] aolfi O100 PmC,r AS, air ai 4"\ 01-1301-200-41 Asir. 12/:6I91 1.16 SON!ir900 ROSC4 1SM 433RESS In 01-40S-039-1t "Sit. 11/10Ie1 PI.13 nNr$1430 ROYCY! Asa TMs C31smr 01-4303-200.11 SAW, 12/NI91 $.IS elw-i'm ROSCNC aSY ORSSM HIM 2I-1305-200-51 MSJL 12/3 1111 SS.ts OOaiT400 ROlE,• ISO I. 12 SS 01-1301.249-4Z Mf:/, 12/]9H1 235.19 4-Vi1403 %*SEW a39 ii Csea WAY 01-4301-344-rl MU/• 12/:9/.1 125.2s SO4iTUa +OSENC ISM hi CSSUL, 1"305-31 Id0 AS. 1♦ 111; 411. \t.l] OINT3g00 ROSCNC aSN ENI C313ULT 25M 301-353-00 AS.II I1/11,14 1.11S.f9 10,CirM00 MOSE4 ASM E% CMOLT 41-130S-L10-00 515.1. 12NI1M1 $.Is e0NEs103 Rise,! ISM !,S CO,SYIr 72-1105.S11.91 1.,. 1. 111G6/91 44.11 S1nirMO0 10S(4 AS, Cos CONSULT 13-455-599.92 Aa.Ia 111;1114 163.11 111Yil Va ROSC4 ITN 'NO C3%sutr 13.431. $19-92 JN./1 ItI»IN •1.53 019!S rE05 MOS!4 aS% ER C31SULT 13-1101-SN.92 1.111.32 -Ess I4110. 12/:✓9a 231.49 OR SLY%•\IeT:M --TOPWL 01N322-Ir433 2If.Ll .••.•. •...CMS 14 to 91 121.0144 9r.ls CaTIr JI Ctf, Olsl Ora NOTCH 11-6I5-313-90 f M MM ma Sc{1S1U 12-IaM rR{[• i. •ry -Zan '1{I 4R0MT R!W01 _ ITCO KKOnrh KCPK III.. IR4. • P.O. • KI{YC _ 54S10012ID6/M It. if cas( P9AEt a E{olr EKIP/Pf SIACCESS OI-ti S2•N9•H --case _ _ _. 4 mo• ..AKO MSI.I 11,3618, 1112.21 Carl 201 Y IK No SUPPLTES Ol"lle-339.11 I45I4( 12/06/u I.11 C)w DO. i Ile fP• 111.111, 01-4210.340.13 - Mft" li/S9/66 1.11 - COAT iw -4 IRA: w SUPPLIn 01-4i10.059.14 - -- _ Mf144 11/06/96 11103 cow OYP All IRA: {H SUPPLTIS 01.4210-049•I5 M4,4a I I/061N .39 Call ]UP •0 IK SOP SUPPLTC O1-4210-R931 • GASIH 1Ili Gila 13/.21 COP` OY. is IK SI• SYHl tt2 OIN2f0-Iil•!! "I'll Il/!s/At .2] C)H DU. -4 IK III SJHLIES fl-at10-1 n.)S Mf14( 111)6/RI 2.Ss cow *UP M IK DI/ S.I.LIEf OI-62/0-2N.62 • IRS NI Il1C6 194 1.14 cal, Sol a4 IV >fl SJvv LIES 01-@10.2N-II u)la( Il/:Gilt 2.91 Cow -V M I.: 0/• SV••L!CS 41.12I0.421-00 • $1,11, tlulu s9 cYr nup aR I c IDS iov^L IEs nNz10-S1 s.w N1141 IW6141 Sns E.w )w >1 1 c vl :urruEs N11k li19 ••. .iI CYI 111 al I aJHl2s n•4210-SA0.9i tn.fJ . • • 54st" 1)/:A/u 5.1390) Alto ! •crib .59!551.9 SCRV O1.1301-0S9-t4 3. 109.13 M5l/I All:611, 16.11 6 a 1 f!..:C:s ti..Ew AA Ot-42214t0.42 ' Mull I2I-6 M. I.27 6 a 4 uI.Tc!s ST wf 3Yv 01-4211-249.12 Mat 11 NSITi H/.fnl 41.a . a I IE.v.CES RLOSIVOS "I 01•I )tA ]t9-t ) ` l II/]Gi.4 11/]11.A f1.43 21.4 G { L S[PI)CIf {LOGSRJS PRf 01-1313-u9 31 mul NN/t It/. fna 1.1) 4 { 4 S!O1Kf •CARS" GAP V-4121.110.91 MS"? IIota I.. I.ts S a 4 SEP1ICEl UiIL 113 wT SUP )2-4034-549-11 mull 11/•61R4 51.16 4 a I SC.ACCS 4LOGIZXIS ON 12-IRS-54/•91 Saw // IT/�6144 {.If G a 1 SERIIC:S .CN:4{ a+ Alin •56692 "Sill 11/I6/I. ).•f 6 a 4 SE-1[C!S UTIL ;IS IM1 SUP HAIR-f60.92 ` Mf111 121 114 G a A 1E.110ES 904I1 2S MS n.l R3-f69•R 1).40 4 4 A ;•1110ES .E411I49 tlF 14-1221-190.91 "Sill Mill I1/'1194 121.10 GI{YP IE4110 14C %fALIP IRS 01"tS•-121.31 "It" 111:6144 12I.6144 121.99 il..n $AM' •EgfP IK lEALTP [w 01-4151.126.11 Mf1IS 111J4144 SO.$, ARCO' IC.LTR )C WALT. IRS 01-41SI.JI9./1 MLh I)C61 A. 19.16 IS 3Y• AEA-fl Ile 'IEAV. IR3 01-IIsl-174.33 %AQU- -:.-10 IK ••ALI. Iw r[.41S1-f9{-91 411.33 • ...... •• ai • 143I/. IL-41.4 $2.34 PIPt1+..yR[GS A4 Us:" CORT 01-41S•.I21-01 Ml CITY OF ORw CWil RESISTER u-lo-aa raaa � • __QCLL4Pc 04TK a iTCO OLSCRIrTIM "MAY 00. tlr. a P.O.a RSlapl •.- �... ST. SO __. _. _. .. . :a • l.f W+_._ 1!/M /M _l.1/2.27 NEW Fn RL LIL S 01-Lau-pa0-la a _CT Nfad fl/NJM 56.11 _ MR Mr IWit2a ►MTaa[ 01-4321-OW-13 4 N.fo • - 1 Mus 12IIp M.1S WIM CIS, Mellow MT AIL CAGES O/-4 314-0811-16 G T.R a•SAS 13/26104 21. rs J4O91-404 1CMIra am Of-t381-Irt-33 21.1f l 0 .•.... wwCai SNN/ ti/a/44 V.Sa JIrOt N/RIUSr 4 am 01.4?Zt-I21-11 - S).So :,s:: e Rgaq. 1.2f3•:] . S < 4turats )'C RFOT 71-4332-515-90 • a «.... •.w ]tF N11N 11-A144 Y.fJ wntrrJNf rlaPLMTLCAr 21-t5•-]t1.1 S Nf3q I21.1/14 E.1) wCr1.1.M443 TLMlteaat r2-asit- if)M ItL//aa I.tl WC111•rH04'1 TUi4VErr L/RILC4 LF )1-UIl-WSI?-oz-IE ` SJ.O «...• � ••w CSS Ns•-• II/TI/.• 4a01 TNI _41C. •.ro/weL 01-452E-220-11 NM_• 1203*11. 11.3t I.! .a[[• rLTS/IML IT" 122-u1. 33 � 17/:1/84 AS.)] THE _acil U1c CRrIS:na 11-4313.31S." IZf.13 NMI♦ 1t6N•• S^JI LTOOCia Rill Tr ac2a/d s 01-a343-3I 1) L ".31 • f.M19 1 -111114 11.44 LfM Lc clip IRCT34 Fwlr •Ts acc•si 91.42 u.t41-42 r�.0 � •rri nrr w a]1Ka `. •. :Kn Ronan AK■ 1M. 11141 awo w M.N. Iran KSatolt" 345441 1arm /0a 92.00 LMi LASE TIRE Sam HIS at IS tawrr ""IS Ito" As t.x'.if rR) 0104E CKSSOL Sac anlTWO • l.r.:.2s . 56*4a 12/06/1114 S40.2T PTKESr ♦SIMLT at fast Sw - SU.2T . • Alar. I2/A/1a 421.6Z .!W-"Sca WILITTES Al../ 12/..104 41.53 41=E4ai0 UTILITIES • ASar] 121Y.Ie+ 470.31 •tm;4nC3 UTILITIEL Ulu. It'. /)I IS.41 Rf11ESOT. SUN 1r.S )va/PUSL • "$$t. 12. nMI M.Si w. inryOT. Sul )ras -R1M)1ML NSUS IJ•a/-I 1).)2 riW-SafS Sul SEWS P.Ta/-usl .•AIs �1/11 Na 3).1] gYIE E)T. iw 1EwS arf HPO.L fu >s1 'I/.alr. St.)S e342wc1r1SWj4p-% aI U1!311 C)wT Sid1 . N)lll 12/"4/P 25..3 RW-41 tai l6E4J7 I-9Fit1 ]Yl 25.:0 . 3L)S51 12 /.Ny 219.)) Nip OILIMS ASW 1T/»/I1 1N.22 15- -MISSES ASri- 1)/.6/6I 1r•..1 w3- v,ILITIES A)SS. 1211.+94 -.S) %SP WtUrt ES %-SS• 1 U A 11, 1.314.15 RSP OT1LITIE2 NS.t. 12/.6/Ia *-.It- RS• UTILITIES AM. l2/.a M. .N.41 .1P - UTILITIES • %.$$- 1211,411. a -.II as UTILtaE2 AS$SS 12/.614- u.2a 13P ur)LI TI ES ),I".:t . • Asia/ 12/.S/II itf.l] PER4 a_ia fill M 11/1S 12-10.44 Pa" - .. r KdOw •. IS1r. � r. 0. ] KSLt Ol-11a2-tw-a2 ..�CFS • ?416o&4"-r3 11-4217-249-42 01-a 1: 1_099-17 01-I324-t29-31 n-1524-S49-9t 31-4322.2t0-11 01-a 121-040. 11 I -a 522-AI.00 41-4122-135-03 01.41S1.12E4t )1-4111-S1 5-90 01N724-0/l-IT 01-a124 129-31 Oliu,-iar•a2 01•a7tM210.a1 T2-a32MS�r-St A-aS2MHh/i t1-alx-sao-r2 )f-a 72M SNA2 2a.•sx-»o-rs 0f-U al-05S-12 ••�CRS c tWI LIST c ;,k_o2 or IRORt qu -� T -.•CN ALfTfi[R 0-1100. ITCR OCSCfwn � CHOT N. It•. f 0.0 "SSoI t2/OaM SO." ►tit. KRs lips TO lilts OINIMf-OMO 34559/___ 12136/64 3.7S KRA Kls /1/s t0 lifts 01-41M1.OSf.1M' xsStl 12136/I4 q.)O._-- _ _ ►CN KlA It/f TO 11/ls - 0•-MIM/-ON-IT-- ti x3Ser 12/06/N 24./4 KRA KRA I1/S TO lilts O1.141-099617 .. _IM3 N'2 _ 12/06/94 1.1N.N KM "go Ills is lilts 01i1M1-i/s-31 RsOOi-12/01tM_.-.. - M7.N ►-- _. 11 K44 Tits Tf fills 44-4t0_115-31-._- _ 3679er Ialu /II 2SS.S2 ►LIIA ►eak tits To ills$ 01N141-121-31 _ Sister 1tmlu 364.13 ►Lu KRA Ills Tf ///ls 01-a14/-126.3/ x17er ti/OA KI Irs.02 --AA KRA II/S TO lolls Ot-4141-174.33 R Rosser 12124/9I 164.1t KRA KRA lips TO t1/ls OI.4141-249.41 USSR 11"61.4 - 26.Tf _ /!IA ailA Ills TO lilts 0Ii141-290-61 M 11/0619• 16t.42 - KRA - F_u Ills Tf 71-M1M1-541-f1-- AGI ANSW I11 f/f{ 11t.ft ►[NA KRA lots To fills TVls t2-Lltl-S8"2 s\iSer 1?1;61f{ yo.:3 ►L•1 KRA Ills TO tills 23-a1N.SA7-f2 "Silt 12/SR/ter 45.43 Ku KIA Ills i0 1V1! n.414t.990.93 1a01.3 . .. "so_, 12126/4. 57.3/ PE MI 3w3rt KN fa YIIN MT Ct-4111-12/-C• s2.)f . xSNt 12/16144 I..^0 -tags 3C 0 two fi "I AUTO 73-4341-560.72 5.21 . M "ARTS 1M.14, 32.%1 .!RIIS T.3.4 ATFAIR RST AUTO Ot-4741-249-42 3Afe'13 1210014, MOC Jo .L4413 TaJ:( REPAIR "I AUTO 74-4341-790.03 H2.si . xSal> IMrt 14, 12.1% ►ITL)A A{ IMIGN Corr Ot.alsl•12s-71 xS615 12/:6144 I".fa 0;1)A a!NIIN AM 01-4221-129- 31 2P.J2 . m/ell 111:5/44 194.1s .4T31'. YMi NCALTM •L MCIL:M IRS 01-3372-000.00 x7Ril ItlO ll\ 41$01 ."$I_'t\s3 1C•'Ti ' 'ALTM INS 01-41SA339-12 "SRI/ 121J6/44 727,10 1 Vlt9TAFC Ka jN K HALT" [N! 01-N71-OAs.IS "3et/ l2A Alft IM2o 7MN1:Cp"S NL.IN -L -CALI- T"L 31-42ST-/21.31 "162I 12/26/6I 93.16 ►-q;; ry\) M[ALTM OL MALT. -1" 01-{1 St-126-31 "Sall N/J61314 eI1.13 141S1Ct AM3 "CAVA ►L wILTM INS OR-Nil-127-31 3.1it1 Itl!i IRA 121.99 .a1SIC1,41 NULTA •L AALTN tAS Rt-al Sl-0n-33 mist, 121Le111 $36.12 .-TiCtANi eta\t- -L M\lt- INS 01-4171449-42 "Sell 1T/]ana 134.13 ►Moil C1AM1 \SALTA pL NALSA [IS 01-4151-270.6/ • "Sall 121J4/16 3A2.22 ►Milt:nMs "Cars at A\LTM I". ".41st-113-90 "Hll t2/16H4 131.60 ►w TSI:""3 "CAL" ►L MALt" TNT 12-41$1.549-91 "fall Ito. ip-{ 121.10 P-151CI44S MCALtR IL MALT- IN! -"a ISI-S69-91 .402.2) m SKt 1N3671. '.1S1.V .3pmv NAM a ASSO: R-ra1RQ 01-4301-380.16 A. T. a t t ...-as ' • � ••�GR; • . •.•-CRS •..-CRS . 1 tnA [ITT or wolw - COMIC R"Tor" - 12-10-44 rAs[ 6• • .�_. r CRICK N0. DATL ANOWt r±\ON ITCH O[SCRATIM ACCOONT w. IN..O P.O. I •CS?ASC • JA5620 la/N/Ol I 6.165.59 PO-01 W[C 1 AStOc Call" 19'r 01-4302-050-16 't 3656241 12/06tas 1.164, r204160 Sala a &UGC LE6u CONSOLE 01 -4 30 s-ofau _ - x1s62e ---Itn6tsa -- A. -PORN. MAIN A asSSC LEGAL CONSULT ---- Ot-A313-129-31- • Alamo 12196taA St.. PYMal MAIN a ASSW LEM COSSIILT 01-1303-1R-33 U 562a 12136,94 96.2E P9r944 4619 a %Sam LEGAL CONSULT 01.1303-249-12 AS628 - - 12/06/St-- -- "s SG - nrg0 ulN a ass*- LEGAL CONSULT CI-4303-840-71 - - SIs628 12/06/54 .so POA6N WIN a HSOC LEGAL CONSULT 41-1303-110-00 14S626 12/761" .11 P"N19 SAR / Asloc LEGAL CONSULT ld-4s03-90S-00 "ibis 12/W 166 ..So P al Wit a ASSOC LEGAL CC63ULT 14-13C3-131-00 - 9.,10.95 . 345650 12/06184 101.52 00AL(FT. AfaE CO LIO FUSCM 71-L5lo-Sls-90 %$*a. 22106/86 2.-.6- WALITT W-11 c0 L:a FJtCM 21-1311-SIS-90 ' 101.26 . ...... ..pus _ SAa111 12/761I1 164.30 STAT -MI 53:ONEITs s00Nf/PEarooms 7/-4240-039.12 "fill 12/E6IA4 14.70 STATE-NN ACu•!os OOINi/PEt200CLS 01-4240-129-51 ts5..7 . S.stiz 17/o6/86 F1.13 ST T1EAs 3S CAN Fo 11.1 11119 TO 1212 01-4142-939-12 - 545112 12/i6/5. 6.25 $T TiE43 it C31 Fo _I:A 11119 TO 1212 01-4142-340-13 At AStlt lz/:6t61 •,16 3r ftElS SS CON F0 Ft.-6 i1119 TO 1212 01-4162-019-11 H5112 121:6194 1F1.45 ST Ftr45 35 :34 F3 ::4 11/19 T3 121? 01-1112-069-1S - Asti 12/^61a1 r2.63 3T Tills i3 :al F0 F::a 11119 TO Ilia 01-4142-099-IF Asti 12/:6141 52.90 at tl E41 is :01 FO F•CA 11,19 TO ti/a 11-4fR-115-31• Asti I2/C6166 331.16 ST "'AS i3 C31 FO F!CA 11/19 TO 1211 01N142-174-33 ' $A)/1t 12/96f44 117.S0 31 Tt CAS is CON F3 FICA 11/19 TO /2R 01.6142-249-62 341F12 \In6/9l 6F.Fs ST T9FAS i :01 FO FICA 11119 TO 1212 01-41/2-290-61 A1511f IIlia 164 FP.H $I TUIS is C34 FO F:CA t1119 TO 1211 i1.6112-5ts-% 34stlt t21j6I61 F2.$I ST TIEAS if C01 F0 FI:A 11/19 TC 1211 F2-41l2-S19-91 J'SFlt I2/C6154 171.16 ST ftres i2 CON Fs r•CA 11119 10 1212 F3.1142-S69-92 $15111 12/E6104 72.1♦ ST TIE VS is C31 F0 FICA 11119 TO t2/2 74-41A2-S90-95 - 1.51r.11 . •••••• ..«CNS $,I", I21)6 Is. 192.53 3JtMLN41 :-.99 iEt im AT:6M 31-e55s-Iao.zt F92.50 .....• ....CF3 54 -1 12N611. $2.13 171C219/4149 14 UNION CON 01-NS1-129-31 12ds ' W••. 6••.CNi Nfl-t tt/:e1la 1!!.+3 aMIVAITTF OF 41 CONFISCNOSLS 01-4156-176-13 - 1l7.70 ...... -Cgs a )119f1 12/:61.4 34.66 MESTWI LIFE IW LIFE INS 01.41S2-039.12 G _ rif Eiiw'!ay A `.c 'eIEgY. .a i . 9114 CITY UP o30No CNCN QSt3TI■ I200-54 PAGE T G MO_O � LtC •NJOT IISDOS IT[0 OGCOIFTI�ACCWN M_._I N. 3 P.D. • IICSSN[___T, 36f6f5 12/06/54 25.36 NCSTMI LIFE IN LIFE t" 01-4152-069-15 - 34Sg3 _ 12106184 _ _ 3.30 _ IMESTM LIFE INS LIFE INS 01 61t2-121-31 •- ASISS 12/06/44 . _ 24.10 _ UIST101 LIFE IN LIFE III --- - - - OIN352-126-31 - J6SSSS 12/36164 30.H NC If CAl LIFE t0 LIFE 143 ON"152-121-31 NSSSS.__ 6.45 WCSTENN LIFE III LIFE :M6 01i152-1 T6-33 _ MASI _12/36,14 12/04,64- -- --_-- --1.T6 --- NESTER\ LIFE tMS - LIFE INS - - -- 01-6152-24t62 - - ' 56l6SS 12/36/84 1.10 NCSTINM LIFE INS LIFE INS UbAI SZ-29"I a SLSASS 12/06164 26.62 NCSTEOV LtFC 1113 LIFE INS T1-61S2-31S-00 %$A$$ 12/O6131 10.12 VESTEMI LIFE IVS LIFE INS T2-6152-561-11 MS.$$ 12/:6166 12.34 NESTTRI L.-C INS LIFE INS 75-4152-561-12 A5Af5 12/36194 1.•0 WE ST CNI LIFE INS LIFE INS T4-4I52-S00-93 194.66...... - ...-CMS 341664 1L;6114 11- WRITE SEAT ANIPAL:3 &VENAL CAA-- 01-4360-165-1S MSSS• 1?1;6 ^ a SM 61Tft SEA' AIi•ILL CO N:IAL -'TAX 01-6161-16S-35 34$F64 1216144 SAN„ WRITE $CAT ANIMAL CO NE1AL PAYNOL 01-4361-16S-35 365664 12136^4 540.20 &-III SEA- &VIRAL CO 'RENAL PATROL 01-4361.195-35 151.5% . AS6 if 1213611, ll.it NAI6MT -EA1 ELECTNI. UTILITIES 01-1324-249-42 11 .l1 MSN. t/N 61N 2N.^^ A):ITAY )34P l,)NSIFTRID:-LS 01-4243-241.42 MIS ASI., 12/)61F4 2403 NE•ME-tl :TT Ft" OFF SUPPLIES OIN210-351.14 2A.cC AS1.J 121J6 ^a 144.10 114%L 113JiTR[FS MVT AUTO 01-4341-121.11 36403 %SO S 121461-4 4S.13 Nr111L, 1R6 E5NV1S COIFISCM))LS Ol"IS6.121.31 65.33 . fU Y.a II/:6IN. 22P.S3 SFEFF, i... NL061i T.BCr 73-AS20-56%12 22N.S0 . ASv,f 121:VN 161.64 ST PIUL $TIMP NNS -TSIPUBL 01i S22.165-35 tu.aA . SAM. R1'f 16f T1.23 SKICR EPOS LOIN NLO3/3NS: PIT SUP 31.4231-011-12 T3. 23 l4SN11 12,26184 35.519.11 5 1 ) ')Nti A..T:N SIAIRIA CMS? 41-031-410-00 53."A.I1 . ASod 111,16154 11.0S.13 F F AT)LE:A3 IVC NIT LINCSILS 73-4341-S69.92 I1.6NS.33 ASN_N SZ1,61F6 1,421.96 NALVOASON :D13T BL36/STRUCT&S 13-520-31140 ---CMS u..CN; Ion CUT M Mo19 CKR M[{[iTEi 12-10-04 90i[ 5 • CNM ON Wl[ .MOST ITEM KSCM WTI= ACCOUNT 0. INS. O ► 0. 1 NESSAK ♦ :' 1 MF-I.a21.N • may. -.. �77"L S 111 9ICLC4Z - SFO SIEL[M 01-2300-000-00 Air.,W.00 . • __ _ _- _ __ _ ._ - ...-Cx5 w ei. - MCF199 1?106114 11.33 COW SETS !4a,S Tax OCT $&US TAX 41-2222-030.03 MANUAL Krla9 12/36/04 2.559.04 CMW R9 S.US law OCT SALES TAX 7/4222-300.00 MANUAL ^ KI•M 121"Y114 2.619.37 CIM1N BM SALES fax O[r SAUS TAX 2P2222-000-00 MANUAL ✓-1199 1?/.6A4 2•534.00• COM R9 SALES SAX OCT SALES TAX rt-2222-000.00 MANUAL Kt 199- 12/]4194 114.13 COW R!I SALES TAX OCT SALES TAY 74.2222.000.00 -" MANUAL • 2.663.)7 . K1 S^ 12M.sm SC.lO .f Sl C31F/SOICol3 01.43S6-129-31 MANUAL KtLI I217.Is. 2F0.34 "STIAJrER HOSTAGE (17-4321-141-31 MANUAL • 2».sa . K»H 12176134 Isle)] SAISSS CO2KR LI3 AUICM 71.6910-515-90 MANUAL • KI212 111-6n. 2.1S• "INS COOKS LIs OIf[ r1N911-sts-90 MANUAL IMSF • •.•«. .... CIS K/734 1'.L6 n4 ?$.IS ST Tt!AS SS CIIf10 FICA Ills TO 11,19 3I-4142-339-12 MANUAL MCf* . I11J6194 H.93 ST WAS IS :CITFO FI:A Ills TO lilts CI-4142.040.13 MANUAL K12). 171=6194 6.19 ST TiE43 55 C7,710 FICA ll/S " 11114 01.4142-0119.14 MANUAL KIF-6 121,6/9. 153.53 sr rtr4S SS COITFO F::A 1115 TO 11/t1 31-4142.069-13 MANUAL ' NCI r7a 1710614. 36. 16 $T WAS Sr CDIf FO FICA Ills TO 11119 01-41 Q_O9 lT MANUAL K(234 12/L6 n4 rZ.57 $I TREYS IS CIITFO FICA 11/s TO 11/l& 01-4142-1/s.01 MANUAL W12:4 It/:6114 191.25 ST lIGS fI W1170 FICA Ills TO It/is 01-4142-1?4-33 MANUAL K?234 171.4144 303.9 ST TAE.S SS COITFO FICA 1115 TC 11119 01"142-249.42 MANUAL KFZ14 12/1.6184 43.10 st TIE43 SS CONTFO FICA 1115 TO $1115 01-6142-2911.61 MANUAL KIF. 1Man6 FT.65 Sr TIEal IS CSITFO •I:A it's To 11/15 ?I-4142.515.90 MANUAL KIt)4 11166 n. Fs.11 sr M45 f1 CONTFO FICA itlf T9 Illti T2-N 42.TNdl MANUAL WIT."12/]61M4 IF.N ST TR!AS S' C041FO FICA Ills JO lilts F3-4l42.SA9-92 MANUAL KILO 121:61sa 72.1; Sr Tie44 ;. :DITIO FICA Ills TO 11//s /4.4142.$90.93 MANUAL 1.)9001 . K/7J> 12/26144 43.30 S.eLil CCSF/SCM:OLS Cl-43sh249-42 MANUAL 41.13 KI?)s 1713s n4 14.51 OR]N LI1 SYNC Sip 71-4250. S13-NU MANUAL KI»6 12/:01I4 2.6 ""a Ll0 iU aI.A OT Mi m"231-SIS•90 MANUAL K/tJa ltg6•H 7.46 MA DW LID FOST.SE FI-4321-S15.90 MANUAL " K/?). I?ICA 114 lt.S6 CIO") Lis - ADVERTISING ?I-4323-SIS-90 MANUAL 41.54 . • MIMI 171% M14 6s2.19 JONN4)9 sell LIO Fiat" FI-4910-515-90 MANUAL KI?.I 12/.6164 1?. t7. ilNN131 9415 Lis DISC li-tall-SIS-9Q MANUAL KI2)l 12/061e6 141.13 11";31 BIOS Mile MURCM ?1-4912-sis.90 MANUAL • MCI Pat 12/:6 Fla..N- J]NNi:I 9435 Mpl WS CM 71.U13-SIS.90 MAgIAL 1.J 71.15 . :NEC% REGISTER 12-10-84 760E 9 191% CITY OF 00010 G C CNECR 40. _"It __1gOUN1 VEN001 IRN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT a. Inv. 0 P.0.O.0 REST AEE _. cr20O 12/6/44 - 149.27 - OUBIT! NINE -- - LIS PURCM 71-L O10-SS S-90 _ -- - 11-A111-Stf-90 _ MANUAL MANUAL _. Kit10 _ li/06 FOA II.31• QUILL" MINI LIO DISC 71-4012-51S." MANUAL NCrtOI 12/06t114 A2.ST OJALIrT NINE NINE PURCN 71N113-51"0 MANUAL_. UQT2�� -- �j/Ci /�A 3.26• OUALITT VINE _ .NINE Disc _ _ ... -- Io2Y.71 ` 1Ci A► 12/06/11A W.16 G11IG2S COINER LIO MURCN 71-41110-S1S-90 RANUAL .C17O9 12/Oi INa 19dA OR ISSS co"ER LIS DTSE 71.4 911-51 S-90 RANUAL NC1700 11276/64 S23.41 OAIGIS u19EA NINE 2URCM 71-4412.SIS-90 MANUAL Ap NC1239 121.16184 10.23- - SAME C07K4 NINE DISC 71-49t3-S1S-90 MANUAL 1.341.0p . AP - ...-CMS 32.45t./7 F1110 11 TOTAL GENERAL FUMD 22.06 FUND 11 .3TAL FE7 REVENUE SNARIIG FWD 1 .T31.16 FUND 13 TOTAL C011M OEVCL OLOCV RANT F 61.13 AM 23 TOTAL RUNIC STATE AID :an FUN N.Rfa.)S FUN', al TOTAL PEA" MAINE REVOLVING F 1010 42 TOTAL 19664a SPEC %SSMNL FUND t3.5] NU to TOTAL 1102 SPEC ASSESSREIT FUN 0.616.41 FUND R T1r AL LI3MM OPERATING =1111 • 1."S.14 FWD R TOTAL WATER OPEP&TING FUND 13.F67.S3 AM IS MAL SEVER OPERATING FUND 1.141.73 F1,10 TA ror AL GOLF :OUR3E OPERATING PO • 9S.13S.SS LOYAL Planning Commission Council PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE 1d'lo`fy PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) . 1, I • � l i•..�� 1- A 1 ME, � `� WWI J U • ' / rcle Planning Commission PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE a -/D .fy PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) _ w ill �.�� • i� / .�.t�. ► I i 1-10 - - • �L'.L� �"i'A Planning Commission PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE ii -/o -1f/ PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) Mm— . N. r SLlii� •-.�740 //a. a 1. LM P i I nfi) in d.+ i0rl IE 4-etolry% S counct, 1 rn v • -%11 -A(i COUNCIL MEETING IN NIwNT K'INNN. IY6fPNT[IT1 p„[Np,IYMA.VM IC Ill M I.p...rr M1IYu. R .. N1.wY. FW e.PYLAL A= Al AllNv..wYr T. 1... I Nr..r.. ,. r nm••-s Iw..r, In. Iwo ,r. NINMA a 11 .4 L.<,.r. 11.11 rr1 r4 .rvrx4 .Al I non CITY OF ORONO 1. .. 1 ..n. C_Ill Ill r.l I, Al Ph r u}.rrp N .4 L..flu r.n Y 4 W a.[n M bN. IkMr rr.r vr. I"p,r .r...,..- ..p..N... .nwY. Al .wx... o- rI+ W 4. IMN •.L . nrly Iw .4�Yw w Trw... IYN IPµM ".l I Il uw rlMn �111 w rlw. N W..r IY All Yr IIx4I nY\.n rn MAva 'Al l Ixw A. vMa :N..MI All b.: rll:.,ll:...11y...rn. I... I. 1...1 r!q Nqn .MT .naY.IA. rn4n �mnl11M. rnlr n.n Mr. r.l�.. I...e wK . e ..0 ..r..x x\x�.e� .n ...r...wlY AI ln.. a �✓ Mln!'/ WIInPT CIIYNITTN rcP`.r er r1.en n. ! nMrl .nr,ln Lv.�.w .�N�Ae nh M.m M, b..f•.bq.M'MMU KAnL11. [INYlr'-1 LT7•Y1.T[P n„; ... Ll..n F Ilr•M ry I. .r •I . Al-PiY MaxnN ..•rl n IAwra .r .I' I. w < ♦ rAN r x., .rr • I.. Ad- r ntw YPlfL I umnn -•. w IdAm M•N4A .w T.InR . v.r4. x I nryrnn4 A'mIe .M Qnr .Ir .•rM \..••e.i.L C1P[ICYLY[I QNIMTCL r • IIxLN n ILI ILA ldl m,0.. ...r Al 14 MNf, Inr ..I. A.P... nyn..n IlIl l'; I PK 3 Mill l.cr4 .MN 1L.1 4 .Y MI" 1. -Ill IllIll .n Cn.rml"l .rM rL.I w .fNml All __A. aMl .m•I.r I4 r.11 ['nn ll.a .11. .1.11 No.ewKl KMA F+rA NKIIy. f. WlruN All Ill lu L. a.x n I\e I4a..1•.. OILL[II[_CW_LTR CPPIY_I f_[PNPi .w rrm.N h fA'N4.. n. I4 u4 ..y.rl i.wAl dll I r r NnwN 4nNr•.Y [wN PNYI,ry Inb Mop .N r rrMV�lr.. eAM r4 CMN`.[ M l _ TM lA wrM=r\ Il�. Ff4 I'nm. A. C ..I. "4re n l A x..4. wKIIY 1 m n M xr .-Al1 ..11 w ..rrl.vNex W I4 Cvl4p a SI. TM•nu x wIF\. IAnA'a1rPnA'[ I.Al All.l ..r[h.K,Mna .M wMMA —I'd I' t cvI- RRrnRT 11 R. b..om..N Tt.>w!n Pl . Al l ... dd, n.m .. no l ,. I.. Add W. xn ro1! .w ...x .le . •w,.4.. .MIY N foot M nY waa. B.IIYLRP rLAIIVt APT PRnIPT .111", RRNIII AT Al ,Addl w.N .d fk¢\.e<r+kA [4 motb. N 4fms IA- I-, e Ill . w mmW All 1.r AlpIs" All "I-, PIMI.1. A, 6e RLak[."Twr. d 14 nwN Y.wnA Yxla.\ri Xlnre [\e nnr.Y 'Np __d A.l .4 wcr•nA YIR RAf. TP+lee .wewle/ [ r K\mN. I. .Y plKlpl I., I4 \IL\ All- x.e A... a Ill- n'Adll 1- . I"' .I" nl All .e Mom...... a 14 /W Ik. .II Mpvmxl nl•x.M r4 '[.•A. olYMw. 1\p.e !41<4. .Pb x MYII M 1 r. Al [R I'll. RA IAT. T., ..n ."Al .L.b .Plf^en .N cork Wr.. G. Ill .MM 14 AM\ u,.•wl rKry.NW R M NNa4 KAl Arl MTA. ex Al Iece1M o T. APrc leb. rel.rl,. .M T.I14 .ecr.r4/ IAe m .mn.nA Ir. llFxrlryaM IM Apl•Iq fvbd x MpN Ys,ar.b IINA K.wl .l"M.4.,N In qe.M I,em 11. CMIM.[ T.e.ibld r41M .l.IerNe .Nw, k.<.m1N .1 .10 r4 A/n IY,nll.e P[pN,bu P.AIb.<A ,M .<pNIMw nN NI\e T4 rerwblq r. .P•r MdY e.IW�' N 14 lul waer¢e �T4 ..nin. W. AllI4 m-, .NlNnl re R. al. we.rNn m, b. la. ro,. tl ANK ww'A nYc...M x .4 Aera. a I4 A...... nrNa. nrnk I-Il .T N'lIY x, ,e ..[eM f prbM 1.. mLrrA • A, 14 eM M I. W. d,l .11er ..elwlb. [IT<A4 .w.4d 14 wwb I., AWwom Ill All- h.I M. A.- .. "M1mll ull w.V . Ww x ,A..V.AeA r..nl.rYwr IIlll - IM .II ry Mr .b M./ wemle•. rmM TNl Ilalh..a nnnd InIN. [ep toll m,e xr a\x w ,A. mgWl se W'.1 .rw .v INL... PRtA4 IPI. IYeIeN - XO..11 Yr flw NwrA .r.wler. m11Y .L, r4 r Irrnernl MrnYr nYrrx �xYiyi M xMf r r.! w Ibrt r }vr nrrxnvi rYv IM'w.nr W .- .o-lwR s....N Y.u.rR.. ..__.. r.r n..Lpi�.r.¢rY 'EMT 1r'+vlu v^rli N r, Nn•rn Mr M, I 9 vx Y 4 Laurr I qH I+ �aW n•r vMe m v.rM. rMll b•M •rr N 4 i4rN4 11 lu• vwr[v Rvvvrr v r! 1 1 r Ilrrr lYlYq u i�r Me 4 r n LiY• 1 r1Y n4 •Kv n rn.N r.Yr...r wrq 1'xIY'N M..II wMi M rY 'iw 1xerYv rTrrlr Rr/1 M N i4urui vJrr Ne M1IY4r yrvy Re ui r4yllnq wM N r.wN 0. nue •VXMIINYIINT •vr rrrlq nu Ljwsiu llM Tx. iwrR Y i' tlrinll. rrNnR. �w it G '-."-w - - - . <+.ox� •r�r.. w.�rnr N Ir Y •RR RnlYI YYRIY w M •YCLV UYIrnXrnikJ. ,u [a.r f.M P. n.q wl.• vl Y bI.. n Ilk.IIf.Vry NM ww Lbvke PA•[ku NknrN 'W,..rw I./ Awl L.I.N I.. 1N..1 14 NN eY w\ Ywu F r / 4„Iv, a ,.44 VYL1 W YA L.wnwll/ . 4rbM1�~ AA[[.WN Fq,nw Iw IN �..n.Nr 4F.y w.•.I r/ bvN w 1 A , ,14NLLLl.M/ v 1 Ln.wrYw n .IW Y Y.W Mew p^ All. n Aw.� . rW1. NI rvq.N u.q NOW w.w4n w1Y'AYl•W {INII nM ^IMYIf Ak Xr Ar.A• NY N sY rIw4 %M ..T w I'W IA.N..� �4rM N ..14 ve , x An4 Y 144 w 10p nN vM 14 Wr Nn.Ib IN rNmyr4 pe w rY JNIY.4M WrA•eJ I:oYNN\ [s IY M1•.N A✓nYK NII N NJIN N w.4 OYYWm m[. LWI•N.,AWA! M lX1e W .II IW 1W I Cann:lm Ye,n4.A. MTP M•F,I ..nN W M1rv. w. AIY4o•n 14 x'p wlwn.l,• 4e•YN IY•eclefr c •I,A ,F I AIIK ryr/ N IrAN �tIN 1YM'tIM Iw •Y INYN Mtl K A d nA• LILW W vb/ IN INL II .N. AIIK A M 40 W 4/b IN INI n wuA Ao IY[rs•A�.m onl.me .N INo .IJ w wY4r. wIM Y 1.•N WIIMKYI sNw,/ wAM ANTn1Y nc .11.1••K ,N Bw CI MT.AGI CANIAn IN INAN N pewne4 . Nr4.4WYA MN INbp Iwn qNn M,Al11 e.,. NN14 JFuu.Ww• IY . :4 I..N rn•N. lAN4r/ K. R,IINI/ rNMNN I4111Y .. ANtew IY cMrM'I. NPwrubr IN . WLN,'. AM AJ rlwd (eniklr WIY w%w1 AW .rMr I rM [ IW.' IIyuN A4•W'NI N.0 IUAW yw4u rwNeW YbN IN1 M l'YMe•/ wu+II nY I NroW. IN _.. I. .IY+ne r AO, III. M N. u I... u 1e 1. n .In61.I I.I Yn I .nM:W III till P.. III .. AM -1 .1 r N WnJ I - I . n r IY IN Kr. IA.N I4NIA I'I••Illnnn W 141a. Yin YVW r 4.n4u ..' MIer4Y0 I LyNmw W 4 IY nYa[.rMw .1 y I 4.WI r Mq Iw aNIFMu IN pq•r. .....Yq LnMw` C N . I. AIY W MIr Y Ply l.n•4 oLNreJ 1+ wnnl Yew. wrlA w YoKA lw AY PeWPW. OnYN Y.IIN .. J Alrnw PJ mA I .NA I N Klynr4 %r rN IW y. NA Me. TYn JYyK .Nr.r rrW Ir1 rNl I.II N :Y Ia1N.NI wr IMrn ♦YY Mr •YI,Atl WIw4r br. �wLu wN Ml .Y A...eA.leen m nP nrn IAIY At,,, nwe INIYI Mor... A MI [[V roK .o o.N. a IL..N0 YY� IYIN MACII (YIFq weNA .N T.Ilk Nte.NJ 14 amb In APpr n CAT1rtI1M11Y 4mrn M.n. Y.asY It... si a T.Y Nkc. I-.., YICVYITY AUA C.r. C Aa.. Cu .M' Cons M NY Iw ewe�Ae.. Ye\N Iw I...NY[.N T41.. - IN.I I.... W:.rw14y ra'Ast A .1.wl p1A .N IAL...u. YI xntru IY N fAm N'Ak wnW. IN, 11 lbllr!II .arN Atl IN,. -.114 -1 W IX Iti ne Y.IN"rIPYIM .11. ..M.YA Ilb"alN Iv IY t[Yd .... N nn1v0 TIII 4 I.M[Ane.1 111 F IY bAN OWYNA IW\N N¢AN IWYIN Ill .tlIW .1. b[. w.w Y . . A.eNr 1.1w1 n 1.... Allen TINOINL w4• wW' JW NrYN. . mll ttll me .N 1.\o NO N wennn f1VUtlND C41Nry InKJ Atl /lu.k Krrn.luJ 14 o wr for JWu ,IT... Tu P.rp.[+. I ..Prn.. I .wJnrl,.. 10 Jen1 ,Aelfa'.•We..4.1 ry M114 k.4wr' 'nor un'a1Y. 14b IInINp N IYI'Lli4N: YN..Y Lr PIAYKI !Tl lu wl11 Yb W. 14 BO.r... A Nw.I Y:IXNIJ 4 OwNlen A I\Y rnOWl .. rW JINer.a lu. rgwNr INe✓4 ntl 4 n"1 n oION/ o nY14 r.41r LnLr n IWY\ )]N n nwNNr Yn e4[IN mt I. AaaeN ar¢\wI JONKI 4Y )oY IIe.W,IO Lmn .4 IIW.K w.N 1. I.e. .N II N[\N wwJeO IN .n. I. ".1, IN .O NI nen mN 'A 1 '...1 1. MI Ike liner 14r K O111 1. InIJ 4 pe,tt A 14 Il,r , F•NJ I . SiI•h4[I/N. Yr Yrn WA .".. IYI M1 LN. d 14 1 N Qp W . . [W.yNlo %q1.w 'As. .. Im\ A 'IIIs Abf On [W[ lran orlr, YNJeY^rre[ •ndl... I AYO Inl 14 mml w.4r d Ilm yAN Ill, Vm/e+llo (FI IN. .1 ... Ik Il 4 m Nq,A...LKA 411 n NU A NN d wA0[M Nw/ Iv [ W NI- . --,I IAI,eNYm,M W Yn. It", Twr4, ..,J tl/iVIiLI Yew4r. 14 t eIt. s I IN ... 4, paltln 4.olKreem A 4 NN 4 JueNl I.u. W.. relOr tll IN [N Ju.e LII n.l AYUYY l'N MIAIJ NeYWI. e...rpe.NJ II., Nu•.K ,NNA.N npN,l lol Ye. CIYM¢. won. W CYIY, _.a . 14 um Nr. I. Ii 1 n ._I,i d Al'.. .It. ellKlln Ile[..41 )1. IV/A. roll ull -11. Yn bUY A4u1.eI .IIL NI d4[ we.4u mll.11 I. bMNNA m XtheIN ki W tIw gT4u A r. manly I.N N.[. n4.r1.1 Ju s.1 lhl, Mf-Ita, Il% l Ctr14q r.eJ W. 1Mren.rn Alwt 14 NnAN IY Xq^rl N MY:IIF.YM TANKNOA mW Y W . Wbot AN pn me W eA.411wrJ nemL[r METROPCL IT)$ COUNCII. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 300 Metro BQuam Building, Saint Paul, MN 55101 DATES December 5, 1984 TO% HRA Advisory Committee Members and Intere,ted Persona FROM: ` Cohen, Chair, HRA Advisory Committee SUBJECT: M, ting Cancellatio.. There will be no meeting or the HRA Ad- Committee for the mcnth of Deomber 1984. Our next scheduled meeting will be J� , -.v85. PC/l= DEC 6 q C_ TY OF ORONO MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIION MEETING HELD NOVF14BER 19, 1984 PAGE 1 ATTENDANCE 7:30 PM The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Chairperson Goetten, Planning Commission members, Sime, Rovegno, McDonald, Kelley, and Adams. Planning Commission member Callahan was absent. Council Representative Thomas Frahm was present. Building and Zoning Administator Mabusth, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and Recorder Naab represented City staff. #877 RICNARD PERRY 44U & 450 WILLOW DRIVE SOUTH SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT PUBLIC HEARING 7:31 - 7:45 Mr. & Mrs. Richard Perry and H.H. b Ann L. White were present. Gary Phleger was present to represent. the Perrys. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. Phleqer noted that there had been a court case involving the lot lines and that the Perrys and the Whites had agreed to agree where the line would be located and to straighten it and make it parallel with Willow Drive. This application has been made as 3 result of that agreement. There is a fence that runs along the common boundaries of the Perry residence and the White residence and a fence that goes at an a --le. Phleqer noted that as of today he had receiveu final revised drawing and descrip- tion from Mr. Coffin and noted the line had to be moved slightly because White did not want it at her gate post. So it was moved s l ight l y to the west to accomodate her request. If approval is obtained the Perrys will be taking that fence that. now runs at an angle swinging it to a parallel direction with the road and matching it up with ho-r gate. We are not intending to create any new lotF or altering lot sizes or gain sq. footage for any purpose. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIION MEETING HELD NOVA- BER 19, 1984 PAGE 2 #877 RICHARD PERRY Mabusth noted that there are no problems with setbacks for the existing structures. The lot line changes have absolutely nothing to do with the setback lines or required building envelopes. Kelley inquired about the access to the lot and the width. White replied that they have a permanent easement of 20'. Phleqer stated that there will be a 20' easement which the Whites have now but for clarification when the deeds are exchanged it will be again noted for the record. The easement is across the Perry property. Rovegno asked that the plat map be clarified. Mrs. White said the easement was created because the Old 87 Poad used to run right in front of Perry's driveway. There is an aerial view neap that their surveyor,Tom Burquist, found at the court house that verifies the easement. Phleger noted that the descriptions, which look forebodingon the certificate survey, will not increase the legal descriptions for the properties. The white property will be described as its present description excluding anything west of that lot. Kelley questioned the fill that was going in there and Mabusth explained that that has already been reviewed by the city in a previcus conditional use permit review. Rovegno stated that we have to make sure the white house maintains road access. Adams moved, McDonald seconded recommendation, of approval of the Perry/White application of the lot line rearrangement finding no negative affects on the existing building envelopes. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Parcel A is to be combined with White homestead. 2. Parcel 13 is to be combined with Perry homestead. Mot ioiis, Ayes ( 0) , Nay! MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 19, 1984 PAGE: 3 #879 14ALCOLM MACKAY 1145 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH PRELIMINARY S-UBDIVISION PUBLIC HEARING 7:48 - 7:57 John Taylor represented Malcom MacKay. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was no one present from the public. Ta-•,lor stated this a matter of subdividing an 18 ace a parcel for tax purposes into one 12 acre parcel and one 7 acre parcel and having the 12 acre parcel adjoining the property which 4ould lead to potential sale. Gaffron noted he had received the septic testing report for the existing house on Parcel A and there is adequate room for future septic needs if existing system fails. There are some wetlands shown on the plat maps, leaving on Parcel A, 5.6 dry acres and Parcel B, 4.4 dry acres. There is an easement of 50' width for private roadway. There is a road that serves the MacKay house and two houses to the west of it. Adams questioned the possible rearrangements and subdivision/variances that might be brought up in the future because of the size of the parcels. Adams further stated that he assumed that the ultimate plan must be to combine the two parcels and then further subdivide the property. Taylor stated he was unaware of any future plan. Rovegno asked Gaffron if a Flowage and Conservation Easement was needed for the wetlands. Gaffron stated that they are wetlands and so we should take a Conservation and Flowage Easement now at the time of subdivision. The wetlands were added in at the last minute by the surveyor. On the original survey the lakeshore was shown closer to the house, which has been determined incorrect. Kelley clarified to Taylor what is needed. Asking for a Conservation and Flowage Easement means the surveyor wi l 1 have to describe the boundaries of the wetlands. The applicant would be responsible for the legal do scription. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 19, 1984 PAGE 4 #879 14ALCOLM MACKAY Kelley moved, Sime seconded to recc-m—id approval of #879 Malcolm MacKay, preliminai:y subdivision subject to the following conditions: 1. Conservation b Flowage Easement 2. Payment of $100.00 park fee: Motion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). #882 FARM AT LONG LAKE, INC., 1765 WEST FARM ROAD SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT PUBLIC HEARING 8:08 - 8:12 Tim Adams was present. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was no one present for the public hearing. Mabusth explained that the division involves a buildable lot in the Farm at Long Lake plat. The lot had specific limitations; a view easement over it, and the topography. Mabusth sees no problem with the proposal as each affected building envelope will be improved. Mabusth stated that Parcel C will retain riparian rights, the other two lots will not. Rovegno moved, Sime seconded, to recommend the approval of the Farm at Long Lake Inc.'s application of a lot line rearrangement finding the building envelopes of each affected property to be improved subject to the following conditions: 1. Parcel A to be combined with Lot 17, Block 1 2. Parcel B to be combined with Lot 15, Block 1 3. Parcel C to be combined with Tract G, RI.,S 1275 4. Combined Tract G shall have riparian access to Long Lake combined Lots 15 and 17 are not riparian to Long Lake Metion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 19, 1984 PAGE 5 #874 DUANE BARTH & MRS. JOHNSTONE 1810 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCE - SECOND REVIEW Duane Barth was present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron note] the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. The following neighbors were present: Charles Pyle of 1820 Shadywood Road Dave and Hol ly Ei ss of 1790 Snadywood Road Caffron stated that this application had been tabled at the October meeting pending submittal of a number of items, one of them being the applicants hardcover development proposal which is explained on Exhibit E. Barth explained for Lot 21 the applicant proposes a 75-250' hardcover of 22.7% using a porous paving block driveway "grass pavers" which would eliminate some of the hardcover problem. They are 80% c en on the top - we used 50% open in our calcula .ion. They are also set in sand 6 - 8" so al 1 the water gees through them. Sidewalks and decks are riot shown on the proposal. The existing garage would be removed. Barth further noted for Lct 2 , with the existing house, a proposed addition and a porous pavement driveway (to be consistant), without decks or sidwalks, the hardcover is 16.4%. Gaffron's comments included a necessity to regulate in the future the possible pavement of driveway on Lot 21 and since we don't require a permit for paving a drivewav, how do we regulate it? Gaffron went on to comment on the assessment record. The vacant lot has not been taxed at a lowNr value, than the lot with the house, hence it does not appear to have been considered as accessory property to the lot with the house. In fact, the land valuatior,s have been almost equal through -out the research period. Gaffron explained Exhibit F, Plat Map of neighbor- hood existing development.. It is from Coffee Bridge to the intersection of 51 on the east side of Hwy 19. I.ot sizes are quite variable from .22 to 1 acre with house. Lot 21 is 0.35 acres. Of the 25 properties in the strip, 11 or 44% are equiva- lent or smal ler than either Lot 21 or 22. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 19, 1984 PAGE 6 #874 DUANE BARTH & MRS. JOHNSTONE The total acreage of this area divided by the no. of houses yields an average lot size is 0.48 acres. In past applications the precedent for this type of application has been set. would this application be a precedent for smaller lots? Sime questioned whether the Planning Commission could approve this aplicat.ion because of the following facts: the lot was there first and it was approved, it has been in single ownership, they have done nothing to alter what was a buildable lot and it would seem that they are grandfathered in. Don Peterson stated that there are 7 - 60' lots to the north and of the 7 the Johnstone lots are the largest. The Johnstone lots meet the hardcover standards where some of the other lots don't. I think this proposal fits in well with the neighbor- hood. Dave Eiss asked if a variance would be needed to put a house on Lot 21. Sime stated that this is the whole point. These are two individual lots, always have been. This is how the tax assessor has treated it. Goetten's c. cerns were that 10 to 15 lots within the zoning uistrict could come in and ask for a building permit. Rovegno asked if both lots had been homesteaded. It was clarified that onlv the lot with the house had been. fie then asked if it is possible to get a tax refund based on the fact that the lots have been treated as one lot. Sime clarified that a person can file for a refund for three years prior. Gaffron stated that the difference being these are legally combined lots for tax purposes and it becomes a subdivision through our ordinances vs two Geparate lots - no subdivision is needed to sell the property. Sime moved, Rovegno seconded, to recommend approval. of Lot 21 as a separate building site based upon the following findings: MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 19, 1984 PAGE 7 #874 DUANE BARTH b MRS. JOHNSTONE 1. The proposal -an meet all hardcover require- ments of the LR-lC Zoning District. 2. All setback requirements for the new lot can be met. 3. From the tax record it appears that the lot has been valued and assessed as a separate lot, not incrementally as part of the adjacent property. 4. The applicant has owned the property since before the current 7nning went into effect. 5. The property has been assessed for sewer. 6. The lot area is consistent with many other properties in the neighborhood and is equivalent to or larger than 11 of 25 lots in the neighborhood. Conditions for granting approval: 1. Granting a variance to the setbacks for the e;:i sting house. 2. No other performance standard setbacks allowed for either lot i.e. both must meet all hardcover and setback requirements. 3. $225 plant charge to be paid with building poermit along with standard SAC charges, etc. 4. Removal of existing garage on Lot 21. 5. the applicant to bear the expense of bringing sewer to the property if no stub exists. Adams stat.Pd he is in oposition of this motion because we would be creating a substandard side yard setback on Lot 22 by allowing Lot 21 to built on. The fact the Lot 21 has a garage on it and Lot 22 has a house on it suggests that for many years the owner of this property has used it as one lot. Had they had both the house and garage on one lot that would indicate the intention of selling the aajoining lot at a later time. But I see this property as one that has been used as a single piece of property for all intents and purposes and for that reason I a;n oppossed to thi mot.i-in. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEFTTAG HELD NOVEMBER 19, 1984 PAGE 8 #874 BARTH/JOHNSTONE Rovegno questioned Adam's opposition, referring to a similiar situation in which a larger piece of land would be subdivided with a house on one lot and a garage serving that house on another. Would you disallow that subdivision? McDonald agreed with Adams stating that we have got to be strict in this matter to protect Lake Minnetonka. Motion, Ayes (1), Nays (5). McDonald moved, Adams seconded, to recommend denial subject to the following findings: 1. The lots were used as one property, house on one lot and garage erving house on the other lot thus indicating that they had planned to use it as one homesite. 2. There is no sewer stub and plant charge has net been paid. 3. The lot areas proposed are significantly less than the average lot area in the neighborhood. 4. This could set a precedence in that 10 to 15 new building sites might have to he allowed to be created from existing common substandard ownership lots if this is approved in this zrni.ng district. 5. A side yard setback variance for the existing house would have been necessary. Motion, Aye (5), Nay (1). MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVE14BER 19, 1984 PAGE 9 #876 RANDY ASPLUND, 3424 6 3444 EASTLAKE STREET VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING Chairperson Goetten announced that #876, Randy Asplunds application for a variance has been tabled until the next meeting of the Planning Commission. The following neighbors were present for the meeting: Harriet Hehl of 3348 Bayside Road Esther Addison of 3382 Bayside Road Barbara Huber of 3390 Bayside Road Kathe Jukish of 3280 Bayside road Don Boylan of 3240 Bayside Road Rovegno moved, Kelley seconded to table the application. Motion, ayes (6), mays (0' #878 THOMAS KAUL INTERPRETATION OF ZONING CODE PUBLIC HEARING 9 : 4 5 - 9 : 4 9 Thomas and Kristi Kaul were present. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. The following neighbors were present for the public hearing: Mary Ann Stinson of 2040 Spates Avenue A.J. Tourangeau of 2060 spates Avenue Pauline Bouchard of 1860 Shoreline Drive Ronald J. Prineas of 1980 Heritage Dri-e Mabusth asked if any of the members of the Planning Commission were able to Attend the open house given by the Kau l s at 1900 Shoreline Drive. Goetten hadn't received her invitation. Rovegno said he had tried unsuccessfully to reach Goetten. Sime and McDonald were unable to attend. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 19, 1984 PAGE 10 #878 THOMAS KAUI. Goetten wanted to note that she had received a call from Kathy Coward, owner of 1950 heritage Drive, now residing in NY. Mrs. Bouchard intzoduced a copy of Kathy Coward's letter which Chairperson Goetten read to the people present. (See attached letter.) Mrs. Bouchard presented another letter representing the Fox Hill Association which Chairperson Goetten also read. (See attached letter.) Mabusth commented on toe phone cal l she reciever3 from Mr. Stinson regarding the application. Mabusth reported on his position. Mr. & Mrs. Stinson have a rental unit in the Virgin Islands and they would not like to 4ee this type of activity a this neighborhood. Goetten react the letter written by Pauline Bouchard to Jean Mabusth. (See attached letter.) Kristi Kaul asked to state her feelings. She realizes that there is a lot of opposition and feels that the neighbors have a predetermined notions of what a Bed and Breakfast (hereafter referred to as a B&B) would be like elsewhere. What we really want to do is first and foremost is have this as our home. We would have very limited house guests coming and staying, mainly just on week -ends. Our main objective is to restore the house to its original state and maintain it. We have contacted all of the neighbors and informed them of our plans. we feel that the way the house is located and because of the existing vegetation, the extra guests that would be staving, wouldn't even be noticed. There are seven bedrooms but only four rooms would be available for guests. We feel that the history of the area is so valuable to maintain. So much of it has been lost. We are looking at our home - not a business. Mcuonald stated she felt that what the neighbors were trying to say is that people are people and it is hard to control their actions. MINUTF,S OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 19, 1984 PAGE 11 #878 THOMAS KAUL Kaul stated that she and her husband had visited the other B&B's in the area and that they are listed through the B&B directory which limits the amount of traffic through your home. There are 40 homes in Minnesota. One example that is similiar to what we are trying to do is on Mount Curve Place. It is in a residential area and the house doesn't look any different than any of the others in the area. My suggestion is to have a represen- tative of the neighborhood and of the Planning Commission come with us tc talk to these people and their neighbors. Kaul asked about a CUP permit. Goetten stated they would then have to make some changes in the zoning code. It is not considered a conditional use at this time. Goetten suggested that the issue of a B&B may have to be looked into and possibly amend the code to include a B&B. Roveqno asked Mabusth if the residential area is not the place for a B&B, which zoning area could accommodate such a facility? Goetten stated this a question of interpretation of the home occupation code. Sime referred to code book under 10.20 section 4(c) for a home occupation only three (3) parking spaces are accepted and the occupation cannot be visable from the outside of the home. Mabusth noted that this applied only to professional people such as doctors, architects, etc. who used their homes on a temporary bases. McDonald asked the Kauls if they had ronsi.dered any other homes in this area for their B&B. Kaul said they had but they thought this was the best area because of the location on a major street. There would be no conflict of a private street where d few extra cars on a given night would be noticed. we had considered the Pierce- wyer House in Excelsior but the size of the house would tend to be more commercial than we want since this is to be our home. MINUTES OF THE. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMDER 19, 1984 PAGE 12 #878 THOMAS KAUL Adams commented that he thought this is a marvelous idea and that it would be good for the community but he felt that the neighbors views should be heard. Rocegno commented that he did remember the application for the subdivision on this property and the court- findings. He felt that this is a prime example of the houses of the ei ra and fel, it would be a good use of the land. He has known the Kauls for several years and finds them to be a hardworking, honest couple and feels they will comp.y with the limitations set forth. He did, however state that he is uncomfortable with the "home occupation use". Goetten stated B&B's are something that we should address elsewhere_ because of the neighborhood reactions. She recommended that staff look into possibly amending the code to cover B&B operations. Kelley moved, Sime seconded, recommendatior "Ir denial of #878 Thomas Kaul, 1900 Shoreline Drive, subject to the following finding: 1. That a B&B does not meet the original intent of the home occupation code Section 10.20, Subdivisions 4 (C). Motion, Aye (5), Nay (1). Rr)vegno voted nay. Minority Opion - Rovegno stated that under Section 10.20, Subdivision 4 (C) home occupations code, he felt that B&B is accessory to residential use based on review of performance standards provided by staff. It is only carried on by persons r.esidiny in the residence, there are no paid employees, the use is conducted within the principal residence, there no visible signs of use from the street, no accessive stock stored on the premises, no overcounter sales, the entrance is through the principal residence and the septic system is up to the B&B as we l as the 8 - 10 member family that could live there. I find the three (3) stall parking not applicable because it only pertains to rrofession practice. Further I find that County Road 15 is a major throghfare and probably a suita- ble residential road on which to place such home occupation. And the applicants appear to be wi1linq to subject themselves tc MINUTESOF Tti::"LANNINC COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBEP 19,1984PAGE 13 #878 4H014AS KAUI. further regulations beyond those provided for the zoning code. I find that this is a home occupation that doesn't require application to the Planning Commission or City Council. McDonald added that the home occupations code should state that hotels and boarding houses not be included in the code. #880 STEVEN RUCK 4625 NEST BRANCH ROAD CONDITIONAL, USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 8:00 - 8:06 PM Kelley moved, Rovegno seconded, recommendation to sta`f to review the planning ordiances to find the appropriate sections that should ;)e amended and revit.wed by the PC and City Council for B&B's within the City of Orono. Adams commented that he believes there is a place in Orono for B&B's and this is a oversi to in the code. Is a 100% in favor of the motion. Motion, Ayes (6), Nay (0). Steven & Joyce Ruce were present. Zoning Adminis- trator Mabusth noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was no one present from the public. Ruce is requesting to build a greenhouse 10 x 25 in the rear of the property attached to the house. Gaff ron stated that it does meet all setback requirements and doesn't affect the septic system. There is a deck in the back of the house. The question arises because Mr. Ruce has some commer- cial dealings outside the home. Ruce explained that he is a gardener and works in other peoples gardens. In the spring cf the year he grows plants to use in their gardens, which is the purpose of the greenhouse. There is no walk-in traffic. Ruce also stated that the deck would be removed so the greenhouse may be bu-lt. This would not include the deck on the east side of the house. Gaffron noted that there are no hardcover problems. MINUTES OF T11F: PLANNING COMMISSIUN MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 19, 1984 PAGE 14 #880 STEVEN RUCH McDonald clarified that the CUP goes with the property if the house is sold but Council can ask to have it reviewed. Mabusth stated that there is no need to put on a review policy of once a year because of the boiler plate language used in the resolution. Rovengno questioned the fact that it was considered as a commercial greenhouse because it is not large enough, there are no people or vehicles coming ir.. Rovegno stated he would li'e to have a recommendation that they overrule Staff, because a 10' x 25' attached greenhouse used to grow plants not for sale on the premises should not be considered on a size basis to require a CUP. relley moved, Roveqno seconded, to recommend appro- val of #880 Steven Ruce, with the condition that the structure conform to a'1 pertinent Building Code requirements and also to recommend to the City Council to review the posibility of refunding $150.30 filing fee based on the finding that there is no retail sales activity taking place on the property. McDonald questioned the use of trucks and -.uce clarified that he only h-d two pick-up trucks that would be used. Motion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). MINUTES GP THE. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 19, 1984 PAGE 15 1881 RRUTZIG CUSTOM HOMES, INC., 1629 BOHNS POINT ROAD VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 9:43 - 10:30 PM Bill Krutzig was present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. The following neighbors were present for the public hearing: Douglas and Ceil Lohmar of 1635 Bohn's Point Road Mr. Lohmar stated he was concerned with the drainage along his lot line and that Krutzig's lot is a low lot and has accepted drainage from the hills. Lohmar noted that Krutzig will be filling in quite a large area which will affect the other properties, and I would like to see a study clone to see if the very narrow strip remaining wi 1 1 take care of the drainage. If the drainage can be taken care of, he would have no concern. He stated that he had specifically sloped his existing driveway to take care of the drainage problem. Mrs. Lohmar observed that within the last 10 years she hasn't been able to walk across Krutzig's lot because of the water level. Gaffron stated that this lot is not a designated wetlands. Krutzig stated that there wi 11 not he a basement in the house. He had consulted with the neighbors and had come to the conclusion that a two story home would I_e disproportioned to the other homes in the area. Gaffron stated that the original application came in requesting the house as shown, the decks, and the driveway of indeterminate proportions and some hardcover in the courtyard area. The proposed house without the decks and additional hardcuver and with a bare minimum driveway meets the 25% hardcover. Another consideration is the lot behind the 250' point zone is quite 'tubstancial and we have in a number of other applications considered giving the applicant credit for that area in calculating hardcover. MINUTES Or THE PT,ANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 19, 1984 PAGE 16 1881 KRUT?.IG HOMES Goetten stated that one way we protect drainage is to limit hardcover, and that the 250'-500' credit has only been used for existing situations, not for new lots for new construction. Rovegno stated that the property must accept the drainage that it has formally taken and not discharge at a faster rate or direct it other than the direction it )Rds gone. That is a building matter. Lohmar questioned Krutzig about the fact that this is a "spec" house. What are they going to do? What kind of guarantee will be provided? Krutzig noted that the certificate of occupancy given by the City will be the guarantee because before it is issued everything is inspected by the building department. Gaffron noted that the grading will have to be done in a way that the water wi 1 1 f low onto the property in the past way. Also, you may be creating more of a problem by putting a house cn this lot than was there before even if you stay behind the 930' elevation line. Kelley stated he would have a hard time approving a variance for hardcover since there is such a problem with water right now. Krutzig said he wasn't aware of a hardcover problem until after the permit application was made. Mabusth had talked to the applicant prior to going to Council and suggested building a 2 story house or building rather than out and reducing some of the hardcover because Council does not look favorably upon hardcover, variances. Gaffron noted that Krutzig was told before the permit was issued that we can't approve it with the decks and the extensive driveway. That was his risk to constru^.t. pilings before the additional requests were approved. McDonald questioned Krutzig about ever building a nouse in Orono before. He has but stated he was unaware of the hardcover stipulations until now. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 19, 1984 PAGE 17 #881 KRUTZIG HOMES Lohmar brought up another point about the lot. Their sewer line is directly under the rear of Krutzig's }souse, however, the house is on pilings so that is not a problem. I.ohmar stated that he would like Krutzig to assured him that an easement showing exactly where the pipe is and a right to access his property will be drawn up. Gaffron stated our sewer responsibli.ty ends at the City's sewer manhole in the street. This is a private easement serving these houses. We don't have any code standards that require sewer pipes to be a certain distance from the house and this is a case that we wouldn't allow today. But at this time we have no responsiblity. Krutzig explained that Gordon Coffin had gone out and described this easement and we intend to describe it by Metes & Bounds on an easement and put it on to a drawing. A formal written document protecting the neighbors will have to drawn up by Krutzig's attorney. Gaffron stated that another issue is where will Krutzig's house hook up to sewer? There is some question as to whether the existing shared line can handle another hookup. But this is considered a building issue. One option they have is to rove the sewer lines but this is between the private parties. Rovegno moved, Kelley seconded, to recommend denial of application #881, Krutzig Homes, 1629 Bohn's Point Road, based on to the following findings: 1. At the time of application, the applicant was informed by staff fully of the hardcover limitations within the 75 - 250' zone. 2. This is a substandard lot in area and slightly substandard on lot width. 3. It is a low lot that provides hydraulic capacity for the drainage of adjoining properties and the building department should address that issue. 4. An adequate house for this lot could have been constructed, meeting the 4595 sq. feet of allowed hardcover. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMAER 19, 1984 PAGE 18 1881 KRUTZIG HOMES 5. That the additional hardcover is not necessary, to maintain a substantial property right. 6. This problem of hardcover was brought on by the applicant. Krutzig clarified that he was not aware of hardcover, he had his plans done according to the setbacks, structural engineer had worked on the plans, and all those plans, had to be submitted at one time. At the time they were submitted was the time that Gaffron called and said we have a hardcover problem. Krutzig staterl that he had at that time already spent $7500. He stated he had the option to drop his plans or coi:tinue on the basis that he apply for hardcover variance. Krutzig also asked if a pool is considered hardcover. Rovegno clarified that a pool is not considered hardcover, the deck is but the pool has its own closed recirculating movment. It doesn't drain, it collects. Motion, Aye (6), Nay (0). FENCE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Mabusth clarified that she would like the input sheets back to her by December 10, 1984. Rovegno questioned how long grading has to sit there before it becomes existing grade? I feel if we have a reference point that you know will be consistant and then setting a height from that point. Rovegno feels that the fence issue should be addressed as a total case including commercial and residential. M. sth noted that Council asked that only the residential fence ordinance be looked at. They also asked that controls be considered for privacy fences that are constructed as accessory structures. Another issue is protecting the view of neighbors. All of the sample codes submitted for this review deal with protection of adjoining property not protection for the person on the other side of a major thoroughfare. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 1?, 1984 PAGE 19 FENCE ORDINANCE Rovegno stated that we need some kind of performance standard. APPROVL OF MINUTES REPRESENTATIVE TO ATTEND COUNCIL MEETING Kelley asked how we project the image tt.at we would perier natural plantings opposed to fences? Mabusth noted that we can do this by encouraging natural plantings through staff input an,j if not effective require that person to file a variance. Rovegno stated that he would like to have all the compiled input back by January 10, 1985 so there is time to study the comments before the joint meeting on Feburary 4, 1985. Sime move, Goetten seconded, to approve the Planning Commission minutes of October 22, 1984 subject to the changes noted by Rovegno. Motion, Ayes (6), Nay (0). Sime volunteered to attend the Council meeting of December 10, 1984. ADJOURNMENT 10:45 PM Sime moved, Rovegno seconded, to adjourn the regular Planning Commission meeti.ng at 10:45 p.m. Motion, Ayes (6), Nay (0). Regular Fleeting, 7:30 p.m., Wednesday, December 5, 1984 TONKA BAY VILLAGE HALL 4901 Manitou Road (County Road 19). Tonka Bay 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call EC W 33. Flinutes - October 24, 1984TY o„ � ���-�� 4. Treasurer's Report o,► 5. Committee Reports A. WATER STRUCTURES b ENVIRO*IENT COMMITTEE (1) Committee Report (a) Special Density 6 Dock License Review - LOT' Fletchers (b) 1985 Dock Licenses (c) Code Amendment - Ramp Fee (d) Deicing Program (e) Temporary Structures Permit Review (f) Shoreline Study (g) Stipulations Review (h) Dock Regulation Review (i) Other (2) Action Itemt 1985 Dock Licenses (3) Other B. LAKE USE COMMITTEE (1) Committee Report (a) Special Event Applications - New (b) of of to Renewals (c) Code Amendment - Transom (d) Charter Boat Registration (e) 1985 Lake Use Study (f) Special Event Stipulation Review (g) Grays Bay Dam Trail Safeguards (h) Water Patrol Report Q ) Other (2) Action Item: Grays Bay Dam Trail Safeguards (3) Other C. EJMCUTIVE COMMITTEE 6. Code Amendment A. Ramp Fees - first reading B. Transom Riding - first reading 7. Other Business A. Official Depository Designation B. Official Newspaper Designation C. Other B. Adjournment 11-30-84 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVAT ON DISTRICT REGULAR MEETING TONKA BAY VILLAGE HALL October 24, 1984 The regular meeting of Lake Minnetonka Conservation District CALL TO was called to order by Chairman Brown at 7:43 p.m. on Wednesday, ORDER October 24, 1984 at the Tonka Bay Village Hall. Members present: Robert Brown (Greenwood), Robert Pillsbury (Minnetonka), Donald Boynton (Minnetonka Beach), Jon Elam (Mound), ATTENDANCE JoEllen Burr (Orono), Robert Rascop (Shorewood), Ron Kraemer (Spring Park), Ed Bauman (Tonka Bay), Richard Soderberg* (Vic- toria), and Robert Slocum (Woodland). Communities represented: Ten 110). *Arrived late. Hurr Moved, Slocum Seconded that the minutes of a October 3, 1984 meeting be approved. Motion, Ayes 19], Nays 101. Elam Moved, Burr Seconded that the Treasurer's Report be approved and the bills paid. Motion, Ayes 191, Nays (0). Chairman Brown declared the new officers of the District installed. LAKE USE COMMITTEE: Pillsbury reported that the committee ze- viewed and made a recommendation on a Special Event renewal permit for a fishing contest held earlier this year. The committee discussed the addition of the .05 intoxication level to the LMCD boating card for 1985, the final decision being delayed pending consideration of additional state or LMCD legislation. The committee reviewed transom riding and will recommend that the LMCD Code and synopsis card be amended in agreement with state statutes. The boating safety review was continued. The committee discussed the possible changes in charter boat registration requirements, including the use of numbered pennants on charter boats to ncuurage boating safety and to impro%,e compliance for the 1985 season. The committee • ived the 1983 Lake Use Study boating index, recently compiled by the county, with interest in completing tht. documentation for use in the LMCD public information program. MINUTES TREASURER'S REPORT INSTALLATION LMCD Board Meeting October 24, 1984 Page 2 The committee accepted the summary of Special Event stipulations for eview of possible changes for the 1985 season. The W.,ter Patrol reported to the committee that because of the 'e'i:TER PATROL change in weather, there was a big slow -down in boating activity REPORT this fall; now boats are being removed for winter storage. The Patrol is preparing this for a new class of recruits and for the assignment of another regular deputy also this fall. In other matters the committee determined to hold a public hearing prior to the January Board meeting regarding ultralight regulation ULTRALIGHTS on the Lake, and to include a news release on the matter. The committee also determined that there is a need for the LMCD to review the handling of boat motor antifreeze and boat cleaning acids, to determine any pollution effects on the Lake. Bauman Moved, Kraemer Seconded that the committee report be accepted. Motion, Ayes 19J, Nays 10). Elam Moved, Hurr Seconded that the Special Event renewal permit W.A.M. for Women Anglers of Minnesota be approved. Motion, Ayes (10J, PERMIT Nays 101. WATER STRUCTURES 6 ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE: Rascop reported that the committee advised a licensee to make application for any changes in his dock plan; recommended a list of d4.icing renewal applications for approval; recommended the Rockvam amendment to add 65 remote rental slips for approval; continued the conver- sion matter; requested a Code amendment draft to exempt fees for publicly owned ramps; :nd reviewed and concurred in requiring dock applications on the long form to help bring LMCD records up to date. The committee continued the discussion regarding temporary strut- TEMPORARY ture permit fees and to possibly issuing a single joint permit, STRUCTURE sharing inspection and enforcement duties with the Sheriff. FEES The committee discussed the possibility of charging fees and issuing permits only where special exceptions are requested. The matter was continued for discussion wish the Sheriff's Departrment. The committee was advised of Chaska Marina's lack of response CHASKA to the earlier LMCD license and variance Order. ORDER Hurr Moved, Pillsbury Seconded that the committee report be accepted. Motion, Ayes 1101, Nays 101. LMCD Board Minutes Oc�ober 24, 1984 Page 3 Elam Moved, Hurr Seconded that the following deicing permit renewal applications be approved subject to inspection and notice to abutting neighbors: Chaska Marine, Inc. Minnetonka Yacht Club DEICING Crystal Bay Service North Shore Drive Marina PERMITS Frank Elshaug (Duma) Sailors Uorld Fairview Hospitals Surfside, Inc. Gavle's Marina Corp. Dave Taylor Grays Bay Resort 6 Marina Tonka Bay Marine Norma Johnson Roger Wikner Motion, Ayes 1101, Nays 101. Hurr Moved, Pillsbury Seconded that the Rockvam dock license ROCKVAM amendment request to add 65 remote rental slips be approved. AMENDMENT Motion, Ayes 1101, Nays 101. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: Brown reported that the cor..mittee continued discussion of the temporary structure proposal, pending outcome of the Water Patrol memo to the Sheriff concerning a joint pro- gram. The committee discussed the need for improvement in the enforcement program for LMCD permits in cooperation with the Water Patrol. The shoreline boat -storage study being conducted by the Photo Sensing Lab is expected to be completed during October. The committee recommended that the LMCD mileage rate be increased from 21c to 22c, and that the boat and snowmobile rate be increased form $9 to $10 per hour; it further recommended Board approval of two small tables for use at Board meetings; TABLES no recommendation was made regarding the PERA group life insurance. The committee reviewed and discussed Draft 3 of the Code amendment regarding conversion of dock use which includes Section 4, a more restrictive use, and a modified preamble. The comrnitte, forwarred the amendment to the Board for second reading. Baun.an Moved, Boynton Seconded that the committee report be acc(pted. Motion, Ayes 1101, Nays 10). CODF AMENDMENT: Hurr Moved, Pillsbury Seconded that the reading CONVERSION of the Code amendment regarding conversion of dock use be ac- CODE cepted, that further readings be waived, and that the amendment AMENDMENT (Ordinance 68) be adopted. Motion, Ayes 1101, Na•,s 101. OTHER BUSINESS: Brown Moved, Pillsbury Seconded that the LMCD MILEAGE mileage rare be increased from 21C to 22c per mile, and that the boat and snowmobile rates be increased frove $9 to $10 per hour Motion, Ayes 1101, Nays (0). LMCU Board Minutes October 24, 1984 Page 4 Brown Mov Rascop Seconded that Resolution 46 regarding DEPOSITORY redesigna; on of the Wayzata Bank and Trust Company as the LMCD depository be adopted. Motion, Ayes 1101, Nays !01. ADJOURNMENT: Hurr Moved, Elam Seconded at 8:55 p.m. that the ADJOURNED meeting be adjourned. Motion, Ayes 1101, Nays 10). Submitted by: _ JoEller L. Hurr, Secretary Approved by: Robert Tipton Brown, Chairman a a,i ay, 'o ff 587'47.57-E ,.. - 1 728.00 Q., 1- --r"—_-400. 00 _- --�_ __ o .3V 240.00 �� r Nei A. s7-w o P A RL 9733 3\ •.� 587'47'S7"E 623.06 JJ j <, '•q 4J� �i1J 24i.)2 37(6.94 E' ) �1 N �asicrr : /vaaye cunrert /lw,o crs. ,.:! ------- m anv'bu%idiny ,-es/ric%n v .� � 'n br,Mrn9 '•s/ric/ion \ ���.i e: FtL 57_E _ ,aJ, C p A NSC53'26�E N� N87.47'57-W 434.It 32 Q z o L 5)i,Qyp .o° Shore /ine / C ti cse� ..:•:Z•;� es'se.-nen> �� Hennepin <vunl PleienCe R s C E I / . ' 333 62 p�rd)n4'9e a u!i/if• easemen>� ' L O N 6 LAKE monumen/ found o _-_-...._ .... 9-----_.._.i_-__.-i--__.. C\20.38 �S ro:7 st Ah.A:ER EL.95Pr.-() 85762700 N'S7"w\ //2/i 2 �? - ' S/OF` Sou/h /ine o1e Pc%c of -7I T�F \ Owner of Lot 16, Block 1, THE FARM AT LONG LAKE Approved by the City of Orono, this _ day of 19_ Mayor City Clerk NOTE: Orientation of this bearing system is per plat of TW DESCRIPTION: ORIGINAL PARCEL Lot 16, Block 1, THE FARM AT LONG LAKE, according to on file and of record in the office of the County Re. Minnesota. PARCEL A (Area - 72,158 sq. ft. or 1.6565 Act The north 104.72 feet of '.at 16. Block 1, THE FARM k the recorded plat thereat on file and of record in t Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. PARCEL B (Area - 72,157 sq. ft. or 1.6565 Ac) That part of lot 16. Block 1, THE FARM AT LONG LAKE. plat thereof on file and of record in the office of Hennepin County, Minnesota,lying southerly of the nc of the following described line: Commencing at the southwest corner•of said Lot lE minutes 03 seconds East, assumed bearing, along 101.24 feet to the point of beginning; thence Soy seconds East, 277.16 feet; thence North 84 degree 434.32 feet to a point on the northeasterly line feet southeasterly of the northeast corner of sai PARCEL C (Area to survey line - 72,158 sq. ft, o That part of Lot 16, Block 1, THE FARM AT LONG LAKE, plat thereof on file and of record in the office of Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Southerly of the fc Commencing at the southwest corner of said LotFl( minutes 03 seconds East, assumed bearing, aloie` 101.24 feet to the point of beginning; thence . seconds East, 277.16 feet; thence North 84 degc 434.32 feet to a point on the northeasterly li feet southeasterly of the northeast corner of I hereby certify that this survey, plan or direct supervision and that I am a duly Re of the State of Minnesota. Date DEC 4 1W UL OF 6- W At OF I. W /4f Of SEC. V 'A A 14 -w yAqar!9.,-.h sq.w A ox or. it aak a Excepnom CrC1cRr10A1 A180*41'37* W 25404.10 CXCCRrIOAt ...... i4 AIA6*f— \,F,45'i�VS�W- L #A '4 /30 2O.N W 19,2/--- ------------- ------ 0 orto r \>�0AWAIA.Uf oF.456mir,41r A/ 'IV 4 I e, \At �j 041rZ 0 77 C fN. �ut V t4 V oreor a j 200.0/ N 9 'ij E Zt. 4411 % 0 r 3 . " - C0 I �1 a 11 .' 249,v - 2Z 179 Of 0r 117 9 T X09 01 111 IA F lei 4 . rp nv* /,e, 'esif comvry MI611WAY USURSAN 200-' 0 200 400' 864ARIAA66 fhVWAI AASE ASStIME0 Denotes 1/2 inch by 14 inch pipe set and marked ' ' ith Minnesota Registration No. 10943 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET - 0 Denotes Cast iron monument. AFNAIEPIAl .-SuAlry) k�h_ -7 77-1, N. REVISIONS Z4, 1 1 S+NbLANe...r+a•r �..jm a ' a _. Y - C SAH s 1 pro poled tot Itne Rearrangement ' B for Xa lco lm S. Mackay and Edson w, Spencer .. ...., .. In Aud, Sub. Mo. 291, County. and Gov't lot 2. Section 2 Nennapin County. Minnesota f ` `w ^� parcel Abinsed am to be ri,t4ima by Mackayl .. . Cart. ro. a56W7 All that part of Lot 1, 'Auditor's Sub- r rlrr..�mr division NLAW 291. wnmpin County Minnesota; lying East of a straight It Orion paral lei with and 1055 feet east of. —sured at right angles, to the East Ilne of the Nest s of the bothwest N of Se Lion ^r Township 118, "a- 23. and the dam extended, an, .,uth of a straight Ilro Orion parallel with and 366 feet north of, measured at right angles ta, the Sr •h Ilne of Section 26, Town- s snip 119, Flange 23. acmru.og to the plat thereof on file or of record In tm offs, of t" Registrar of titles in s and for said County. parcel 8 Ito he trans/erred from Mackay t. Spencer) Cert. ro. 456645 All that part of t I. 'Auditor's Sub- division NlnDer 291, Reompin Coo' Minnesota'. lying tas' Of a straight line dram par n wtt11 and 725 feet East of, measured at right angles to. the East lihe of the u Nest s o� Suuthwpsl s of Section 26. TownshlD 1111. paflge y 'f, 23. am ,JIng North of a !Im drawn parallel vl in and 366 feet feet North of. measured at right angles W. the South !ilia of Section 26. Township 118, Range 23. ' acm fng to the plet thereof on ff le or of record in the off Ice of it* APO istrar of Titles 'r and for said County. I i parcel C (to be retalriea by spencer) •i That part of mvermlent tot 2. Section 26. Township ite ' y North. Flange 23 writ of the Sth Frisf pal Aer:dI.h. lying Northerly of 'reek and westerly of the Col lows ng descrine0 Ilm and Its Southerly extension- Coo.— ing at tm Northwest corner of It. Southeast / • a [ gu+rter of said Section 26. thence on an asS—d A bearing of oath i"03'a5^ Nest along the Nest Ilse of solo Southwest guar ter a distance of 1168 feet to the y Wink of beginning of Clip Ilse lining described; theme _ South aS" East a fsta-ce of A18.5a feet: these South v 9-06'west a distance of 6t0. 58 feet; thence South 5.Sat East to the Southerly 11, of said ibvernsent tat 1, and Iliere ending, ~..w p.�.(�,a- ♦ S 1 . t•F .-`• IICCE!I that part thereof IYlnq Northerly of tfle "Surrey i••' - '•-^^» Y Ins of Ilenpe In Count State Aid MI hwa Nunber 6, plat raw • r.•rti. ��, ra ar w•.-rr p Y 9 r f .., r�•._ _____. __ 5, as delineated In Nook 3, Page 1 of Mighway plats as - -- - — ---- — — —1.1.1ded on the office of the County Reorder, C..mns - Le+x 13a17dld T—pec[ay _.__—_— . * Y—C 74T__.________--___. Lakr .. v.,, rr '•�• RaTfTcrr M�—. I hereby certify that this Survey was prepared -� by me or Land, my 01 rest supeny"pin. ono indI am A duly Registered land Surveyor under the laws of lne State of Mlmesota. Scale: I Inca . 100 feet PARDON R. COFFIN CO., IN[. Date Oett ben 1981 o Iron sinker Mark S- Gronbery .egty755 Gordon R. Coffln 14: No. 6065 F—imers end land Surveyors I Lake. Minnesota C Dee. lo, /gay