HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-26-1984 Council PacketMINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVE;MBER 26, 1984 PAGE 1
ATTENDANCE 7:00PM
7:00 PM APPEARANCE
MARTY .7EsSEN -
HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK
RESERVE DISTRICT
CONSENT AGENDA*
APPROVAL OF MINUTES*
LAKE MINNETONKA
DISTRICT REPORT
'_''he Orono Council met on the above date with the following
Adamsrs present: Mayor Butler, Councilmembers Frahm,
and Hammerel.
absent. City Councilmember Grabek was
Attorney Radio , Public ork
Coordinator Gerhardson, Zoning Administrator Mabustns
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and Cit
Recorder Sutton represented the City staff. y
Marty Jessen was present. Jessen gave the Council a
status report on the Hennepin County Noerenberg Park
Project. Jessen stated that a committee has been
established and will meet at the FWBI on Thursday,
November 29, 1984, at 4:00 p.m. Jessen noted that the
two Orono representatives have been very helpful in
Countgiving y wall be accepting bids on the
ckground on the park. Jessen stated that the
gazebo. Jessen noted that the resto ati oll work will
done the summer of 1985. Jessen noted that th,?
has made available to the Cit County
y� County
of t;ie will
regarding the Noerenberg Park.
Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmembe,
seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda Adams
staff reports concerningthe*' with all
to be ached to
an original copy c;f these minutesems on file intthe City
Clerk's office. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (o),
Councilmember Frahm moved,
seconded, to a Councilmember Adams
Pprove the minutes of the regu iar Orono
Council meeting held November 13, 1984. Mr,tion, Ayes
(4). Nays (0).
CONSERVATION
JO Ellen Hum was not present. Zoning Administrator
Mabusth explained that Hurr had contacted her and noted
that no board meeting was held by the Lake Minnetonka
Conservation District in November, nothing to report. Mabusth noted that the next board
meeting wall be held De^emi-- 5. 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION
COMMENTS
There were no Planning Commission comments.
PUBJ..IC' ('(aMlyh;NTS There were no comments from the public
present.
Meet inn - M. 4 . ., n...r i •
MINUTES OF THE: REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL, MI-FTING HELD NOVEMBPR 26, 1984 PAGE :)
1816 LAKE MINNETONKA HOMES
155 WILLOW DRIVE SOUTH
(COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE)
APPROVAL OF STREET NAKE
6 FINAL PLAT APPROVAL -
RESOLUTION Richard Conry was present to represent Lake Minnetonka
Homes. boning Administrator Mabusth noted that the
new street name has been changed to Manor Circle so that
it will not conflict with other street names.
Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Adams seconded, to
approve the street name of MANOR CIRCLF of f Countryside
Drive. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0).
Councilmember Adams stated that. the resolution doesn't
note that Manor Circle will be a private drive and that
Countryside Drive will be a pub] is street after all lots
have been developed. Adams suggested tha_ Manor
Circle being a private road should be noted in the
covenants.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that it is clear in
the covenants that are f i led that any other streets are
to be private. Mabusth added that in the City
resolution it notes that Manor Circle is a private road.
Councilmember Adams stated that in paragraph four of
the resolution that it should note "a separate
maintenance agreement to cover the maintenance of the
private road, Manor Circle".
Richard Conry expressed his concern over the resolution
which states that no building permits will be issued
until the road bed is completed and also a certificate
of occupancy will not be issued until all seeding and
sodding iscomplEted. Conry explained that if the road
bed is installed prior to any building permits, new
construction would tear up the road. Conry also noted
that not allowing certificate of occupancies until
seeding and sodding is finished, makes it impossible
for anyone to move into a completed home during the
months of November thru March. Conry Basked that these
conditions be removed or changed.
Councilmember Adams informed Conry that the road bed
must be in prior to buildinq permits so that emergency
vehicles such as ambulances, fire trucks, and police
vehicles can get access to the homes. Adams stated
that, this condition is for the safety of the residents
and/or contractors in that. area.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that she would do a
survey of other Cities to see how they handle the timing
of the building permits and cert i f icate of occupancies.
Coutic i Imember Adams ry,ovc-d, Councilmember Frahm
seconded, to table art icn on the f inal plat approve l
resolution until the Derembe:-r 10, 1964, Counci 1
nrerc t i rol . Kati 11. AYta(4 ) , Nava (0).
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING 11ELD NOVE:MBER 26, 1984 PAGE: 3
1838 DOUG KLINT/TOM BI:RNIER
PARTIAL VACATION OF MAPLE
AVENUE - RESOLUTION 11699*
Doug Klint arrived after the Council had acted on this
resolution.
1861 STEVEN PAULY
3980 DAHL ROAD
VARIANCE
RESOLUTION 11700*
1869 JA14ES PHELAN
1231 WILDHURST TRAIL.
FINAL, SUBDIVISION
RESOLUTION 11701
WATER RATE REVIEW
ORONO RESIDENTS WAYZATA
SERVICE AREA
SALARY ADJUSTMENT
THERE.SA NAAB*
Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember Adams
seconded, to approve Resolution #1699, A Resolution
Vacating a Portio.i of Maple Avenue. Motion, Ayes (4),
Nays (0).
Councilmember Frat,m moved, Councilmember Adams
seconded, to approve Resolution 01700, A Resolution
Granting A Variance to Steven Pauly to allow the
construction of a deck. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0).
James Phelan was not present. Zoning Administrator
Mabusth reviewed with the Council the final plat.
Ma%,,or Butler moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to
approve Resolution 01701, A Resolution Approving the
Plat of HEATHERCROFT. Motion, Ayr's (4), Nays (0).
Mayor Butler noted that City Engineer Cook was not
present and that this would be reviewed at the December
10, 1984 meeting.
Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember Adams
seconded, to approve a salary a3justment for Theresa
Naab from $7.00/h: Lo S7.28/hr effective December 3,
1984. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0).
ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN
MUNICIPALITIES PROPOSED
LEGISLATIVE BIENNIUM* Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember Adams
seconded, to approve the Association of Metropolitan
Municipalities Proposed 1985-86 Biennium. Motion,
Ayes (4), Nays (0).
LIQUOR STORE OPERATING
RESULTS* Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember Adams
seconded, toapprove the liquor storeoperatinq result!, -
three months ended June 30, 1984, repert prepared by
Finance Director Kuehn. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0).
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 26, 1984 PAGE 4
1985 APPROVED BUDGET* The 1985 Budget, as amended by the Counci 1 at the special
meeting held October 1, 1985, was included in the agenda
for information only.
REVENUE SHARING REIMBURSEMENT
FOR BUDGETED EXPENDITURES*
Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember Adams
seconded, to approve the revenue sharing reimbursement
for budgeted expenditures report prepared by Finance
Director Kuehn. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0).
SEPTEMBER, 1984 MONTHLY
YEAR-TO-DATE SUM14ARIES
OF RECEIPTS, DISBURSEMENTS
6 BALANCES* Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember Adams
Seconded, to approve the September, 1984, Monthly Year -
to -Date Summaries of Receipts, Disbursements and
Balances. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0).
RECENT COURT ACTION
INFORMATION ONLY Tom Radio stated that this item was for information
only.
PUBLIC EASEMENT FROM
BURLINGTON NORPHERN Tom Judd and Art ,Johnsen were present. Bill Wolfe of
3255 Crystal Bay Road was present from the Crystal Bay
area.
Tom Radio stated that. the houses do have access from
Crystal Bay Road. Radio stated that if the Council
decides to acquire this public easement, that the City
must decide how to assess the public that benefits from
this. Radio stated that it would be approximately $315
per property owner (8 property owners).
Tom Judd asked the Counci 1 to provide a public easement
from Burlington Northern Railroad for the residents of
the Crystal Bay area that don't have access to the rear
of their properties. Judd stated that. Burlington
Northern RR has stated that they will not grant a
private easement but would be willing to consider a
public easement to the City of Orono and Minnetonka
Beach. Judd explained that the railroad has already
done the surveying and easement work, so that the costs
to the City would be minimal. Judd stated that the
easement is needed for the public health, safety and
welfare of the area, so that emergency vehicles can
reach the properties legally. Judd stated that the
City does receive a benefit and should bear some of t: he
cost.
Bill Wolfe of 3255 crystal Bay Road stated ttat the
easements are needed and that all the residents in the
Area are in favor (.f the public easement. Wolfe stated
that he would he wi l ling to pay the S315 assessment.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 26, 1984 PAGE 5
Council had no problFms with acquiring the public
easement as long as there was no expense to the general
tax payer, and the benefit.ting residents pay for the
easement.
Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember kiammerel seconded,
that the City acquire the public easement and for the
City to absorb the legal fees to -date and any fees after
this will be assessed against the project cost.
Residents to pay for easement to the City and City .in
turn will send a check to Burlington Northern Railroad.
City will not maintain easement, but the responsibility
of the property owners to maintain easement, with
maintenance to be consistent with past practices.
Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0).
POLICY REVIEW -
COLLECTION OF FEES City Attorney Radio recommended that this item be
discussed in executive session.
SIGN ORDINANCE REVIEW Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed with
the Council the temporary sign ordinance.
BILLS* Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember Adams
seconded, that the All Func's Accounts and Liquor Store
Accounts be paid. Motion, Ayes (4), Nay--- (0).
ADJOURNMENT 9:15 PM The Orono Council adjourned the regular Council meeting
at 9:15 p.m. and entered into executive session.
Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0).
ATJ'�,ST :
Axeo'?'z
rott,y f
Hall.in, City Clerk Mary C. Buter, Mayor
AGENDA FOR WINCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, NOVE;MBE:R 26, 1984,.7:00 P.M.
(*) Asterisk ;terns -ireconsidered to by rourine items to be enacted upon by one
motion icy tho City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda.
Discussion will he held upon request.
ROLL CALL
7:90 P.M. Appearance - Marty Jessen Hennepin County nark Reserve
1. CONSENT A ;EN►DA*
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
* 2. P.e(3ular Meeting of November 13, 1984
PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSEPVATiON DISTRICT REPORT - Jo Ellen Hurr Representative
PLANNING COMMISSION COMME:N'rs
PUBLIC COMMENTS
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
3. #816 Lake Minnetonka Homes, 155 willow Drive South
a) Approval of Street name - Countryside Circle
b) Final Plat Approval - Resolution
* 4. #838 Douglas Klint/Tom Bernier - Partial Vacation of Maple Avenue -
Resolution
* 5. #1861 Steven Pauly, 3980 Dahl Road - Variarcc_ - Resolution
6. A069 .lames Phelan, 1231 Wildhurst Trail - Final Subdivision - Resolution
CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT
7. Water Rate Review 'bone Residents Wayzata Service Area
MAYOR'S REPORT
CABLE TV REP610'
TRANSPORTATION REPORT
CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
* 8. Salary Adjustment - Theresa Naab Administrative Secretary
* 9. Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Proposed Legislative '85-'86
Biennium
*1P. Liquor. Store Operating Results - Three Months Ended June 30, 1984
*11. 1985 Approved budget Document
*12. Revenue Sharing Reimbursement for Budgeted Expenditures
*13. September 1984 Monthly and Year to Date Summaries of Receipts,
Disbursements and Balances
CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S LETTERS AND MEMOS
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
14. Recent Court Action - Re: Building Permit Denial
1I Public Easement. from Burlington Northern
16. Policy Review - Collection of Fees
LICENSES (17*)
BILLS (18*)
ADJOURNMENT
PARK RESERVES
BAKER
CARVER
CROW HASSAN
ELM CREEK
HYLAND LAKE
LAKE REMCCA
MURPHY HANREHAN
REGIONAL PARKS
ORYANTLAKE
CLEARYLAKE
CLIFTON E FRENCH
COON RAPIDS DAM
EAGLELAKE
FISH LAKE
JAME.S W WILKIE
LAKE SARAH
SPRING LAKE
.&PC1AL USE AREAS
AATWIR E ALLEN WKDt IFE
SANIIUARY
SANFR PARK GOLF COURSE
CLEARY LAKE GOLF COLRSE
HYLAND HILLS SKI APEA
NOC RE NBE RG MEMORIAL PARK
WAWAIASSO ISLAND
WILD GOOSE CHASE ISLAND
TRAIL CORRIDORS
NOR*H HE NNE PIN 'RAIL
BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS
DAVIO LATVAAHO
CHAIR
Got TO VALLt I
WILLIAM N. GOYNTON
!<.I r.HAiP
SI LOUIS PAP.
JUOITH S ANDERSON
HL OOOJ I NG ION
PATRECIAO BAKER
MINNEAPOL IS
NIIIILEV A. OONINE
MAPLE PLAIN
WILLIAM I NOL/R(.OK
MINNC APOLtS
SCOTT L NEIMAN
MINNt APCri .1
VERN J HARTENOUNO
5VPERINIENEN!N1
SECRE /ARV TO THI BOARD
Hennepin County Park Reserve District
3800 Cowity Road 24 • Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359 • Telephone 612-473-4693
November 5, 1984
Honorable Mary Butler
Mayor of Orol,o
P 0 .Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Dear Mrs. Butler,
As we've discussed several times on the phone, the Park
District has established an advisory committee for the
Noerenberg Memorial County Park. Enclosed is a roster of
committee members. The chairman is Dick Gray. The committee
has met twice, first on Wednesday, October 17, when it toured
the garden alld the adjoining park property at Noerenberg.
The second meeting was held on Thursday, November 1 at the
Freshwater Biological Institute.
Tile District Board charged the committee with 3 primary
tasks as follows:
1. To advise staff in the review of the Master Plan for
the Park.
2. To recommend appropriate changes in the Plan and
establish a long term working plan for preservation,
improvement and maintenance of the Park.
3. Recoolmend appropriate funding strategies for develop-
ment of the Park per the Master Plan.
Enclosed is a copy of the outline for the committee which the
Board approved and which describes the composition of the
committee, its schedule and other pertinent information. Also
enclosed is a skeletal work plan for the committee and a copy
of Mrs. Hoppe's will conveying the property to the Park
District. Finally, I've enclosed a copy of the Master Plan
for the park which was prepared in 1977-78 and which the
committee is using as a starting point for their deliber.Elions.
A copy of the agenda for the second meeting held November I
is also enclosed. We distributed copies of the inventory of
floral display gardens in the Metro area to the committee
members at that time. There was considerable discussion
regarding the will and Lue earlier Master Plan and a verb
informative prespritation by Diann Goetten of Orono regarding
Orono's concerns (Agenda Item #14).
The next committee meeting is scheduled for 4:00 p.m. November 29
at the Freshwater Biological Institute. Thus far three items
are planned for that agenda as follows:
1. Interpretatitn of the will.
2. Presentation on the philosophy, background and plans of
the Landscap( Arboretum.
3. Potential concepts and themes for development of the
Noerenberg Memorial County Park.
I hope this information is of interest to you. IJe will keep
you informed as the committee continues its work. I would like
to schedule a presentation before the Orono City Counci' ve—
garding this as soon as possible. I will oe contacting Jeanne
Mabusth in an attempt to find a suitable Lime for such a pre-
sentation. Please contact one if you have any concerns or thoughts
as the coianittee continues its work.
Sincerely,
Marty (� en
Central D4.vision Manager
MJ / nm
1 IENN►_ - T r! t:C+ IN T'r r ARK W: c•E.RVF u i sTF. I C-r
CITIZENS ADV 13OF- t_+JMM I TTE.E
t.iOI Rf Nr,U.R ; i' FMOR r fit... GOtlN 1'Y r1%1RK
p r+rpU�r3 Thy Hennepin COUrIty Park: Reaerve Di. 3tr- t •_t , 0-ar d of Nark:
Cumrr!i si..!n�rs, yerJs Lhe nosed for cau!rn14-toe
representing a broad spectrum of pub Iic inter Rst3 to
advise on mattes pertaininy to the planninq and
develupment of the Noerertberg Memorial County Park. The
Cummi tterr is establ i FI.ed t.:):
1. Advises staff in Lhe± review of the P'astwr Plan for
the Park.
2. Recommend a.ppr'r�Nr ia: a charrcyrsa in thr, nl an and
eSt. -AhIish a l;ang t�lrnt war kir'tq N14t!t for
prssc-r `',aLiav, aftd r,Y�iritenance the
Park.
3, Rr=cr: rnmer,rj aupr c;Wr i at: c +c•rlcii
.1tvv-elopment of the park: pur the, Haster PI an.
'i ructti�-e,;. ThLA Comrrri t.t eK is; t'truc t.urrtd 50 ;errs Ln des+, ne di s+ i n c t
fr,r!r-tiors r)Pteded to *cr.c:nik+l ts4h the purpc.sot
rit34 irIv Apprac.-ic. la
and '.4'Ass tt.;e !"mat- i and Id V i So
on physica.l rilAnning, wea oper-:t.ic:ns
r,atelf4d to IR i i ve+r t.heese semi c w-A .
• f''..4�'".`_;tic.:l. _:fin-! __FL!la�"_ to ir,:,l .'zr-
aeriutAs bVi Idings in the for hist,it i,_al
i ntor ,4t CWLI si. r;ni f i a or-:.� and !dvi se a to +_nset r
di 50os tior+ , ,! p•�rk rJePvr�i w:►n,etrt r rtenf .clrr,
r!asa.,�r �tiun, r�r dwinol ition.
D`•'"'�:_rx^Li't:I' totr;.l,ve vatrfocis Ccttl nq a •c,r,-r�•e
and :trl,: i se h t-,e r t,r:-.! vn a p l &ti for + n o(oc i n- '. hp
rt«sve'i •prnt3nk r11 U-1-
t��ry�r' e�r!F1.,,�_jr•s i•r,. :.rr ee .iF ?-hri? rjii:rt..r.,. T•33 in` 1-01 -ewj '.tf-►)� �' %:.
t.hr� {c:i Ic*#irr<t It +,e—r, l cis nt1 - iecf. -ets LW;U* i r.y i.cr
WhILh reprr3eeMt4tic►n t ri+'mjir ibls�:
' for i-i,. tr,r,- 1 "I,
• '•tt,,,l• try!. .., I. t.••+ {
0
S. City of tworl"
i%. Planming Cowii,S-1.10ri
I). Park and Pec. Ct.;miti.
Thq ;.-Ake Mifinutunf.a Community.,
a. Lake Minn--tvnIm--.a ConsRr-
vation District
11it? Wayzat-a
Society
15 Individuals
S. An iinmediaLe neighbor
7 liennepin Caimtv F-::.iri.
District Board
3t af f Li Ly Jesstn i &; thv: f I i ai Son t (j 6)w AJvi for-,
r i t k s- 9, r.tf-Ar -; 4- j f, -F .-,# i 1 1. 'u� - c # i. I . :1,20ri f- ^N
tE, t,nira; wiv i C' - a s nef-df-d pint I. I , 1.0 al I Lhe Plamiling
F'requono-v Of
Mef-t i nrj Ci 4n C i. rat pd +x; t.- t- rplat. 0., 1 V
.-Owrt or q t 1 t v. work swi I ", -,.,-n ist r.0
l.h1r tit (7 4 Do n r 0 s-q n d 3tA++ it ' flit.- 1"I't1will'y o" I I d 4 und i I f(i
"wip, The C Jim(I i v4i 1. i "Also o I I
C'UtIf",ib. L Line 11*1 a got, 40t a i
-xrea-o
Thtw COMM4 La not have ally
in 2f%,;ntn#j p,%r- k
As ovv, +:
I lat i h,.- t-o4 r k w-F 1..i* Ce_vlfmittaq wit; i-W
-jut I 1v M'4
sionthl v ba-m i 9 x n i i i I I y to i-iw-i, .I wo-i -tnqii a rv,01,tirivilk
;0I L*. It wi 17 th-i- P-er f "I #.A,- I ; -r k.1 I f
v 4,4t i Iris .10 i
110,
IWO
.. 1
_tt+% ., 1:�,.y ,^�,1;' �;•;mmi4,11.:�.ii:
'fjr Flo it)
�. Wttebt should be tl+t, 3c_e91r' trtul t.111-4t�'t of the
duvel op ownt of the garden p art: t c?r+ Cf th+? park':
Wh,At doea , the Will t 4qui r�-%,
What is r9eded gtvren -tthir opporturwitivo
nwti l abl r: in the aroma^
:?. What should he tht4 ttx ta*nt If d"vel opwon r i o the
sanctuary portiao tJ the pmj- � .,
7. What kind - .af rpr'r(jt-Am,ni!-j and tAh"r
spt!riH1 services �-hr_+t.tld by offtit ed tr attract
-.a-tors to thin Para"
4. What capsc:i ty of 04.ibl iC uhts .:hould be anti-:1 patad
,-,nd Ft)t
5. ',hat 1 . t.tl (3-r- *st_r lee4b i-Ctt � G.�►-S�E'it iy 1.aHt19d, r . � •
Auto, :Aus, bi lee. Uoat
3;
1 . What hi strr t t-,iI i ntfor•os# �,c ,i •�rsi t, �. %ar'r-®t ttt� fare
+/or, 1ouis sf..t ':i 1�t'rag hD1•J h kehCt, the pufftp
!,ntAng� ca►ri?tflP 11ow..:R. RAY i i_ + _ t►tj._t jp I by btir n,
tq f t er- ': +wept
bruit'+-t t,to l..dtmr4 s tit +t, attt:e�Id t, r0*4jI. rn1r1,
minanod9 and inter ;,r T.F :i as h1. +-c�rtr. xi iy
to fic.:t+rIt?
111b t;inds , 4 hisfor-lr-al irttr..Iprwt.All tiQn
eF ��.. �+n t•� �rtr.>lr* �_t��w'� to the* 13SO '
A . What put.trrntI all f Itrtlli rrq p-r_r.r. f- r,.-
r)M.:00iQi,t'Vrt #j'jQ tjpewrt 4
tind
i ,
'L-f It" eP 1,,'Ji W; l0i -L 1. r iLt
h,.--jorenbwrmj 1'1•:�'r +, ,. ,, 1 -xtclty Park
t4dv i %or Y i.: wc-,
Work P I poin
lmt!l�rll _LLULDYM llitllft
I Oct 17
I.IntrAuctior of Opf"ber,., A.nd re.,jrew jai
Ole
Comm.' Lwe * cndroe -A- adapted by 'he Henoupif,
County cbre ietetwr Di �tr i t:r Huard
Oi
Comm t ui � i cjfl Pr S.
2. T u tour the For P Orld gaki n f i )--et
h;trid
knawlrrdgo of (.he ex(-Rnt an.! of
i 'Al vJ
i i -, vc) I vud , r-c,ndi t i oi s c i I .;. I tbt i I I-, Ll _t i j c
--us.
Pafjt• iprAti#lCl practi-.-.vE, !. :,
S. To review ll-hv J.uq�l ! i t 2 an s aL,
sr—ri
in M r -,-, . HOOPIM't- r1l.11 14101; wfticl- the 01
muiA "vratte and jeyolor +.jtt Park.
J. T.:) review ljit �f,hw- I C r *Al i :,p t &Y
*fir wisrspor'C',
in
,c r j all: ,.An P r..) rl t-4 a c h.- r m c it w-
And
P.rt rt or *It t.,,in,
I woo
r.,.) Ion C I .ant! t JL bc1J.0
wc) 1J.PW -A
'iub-f7omw t jq*
i-IAl 1 0#1 4 "1 10011 .4 A 44-
40%. Jaii
;1N
Wes t alen t i. I tq t ,xt Pt, Pd.
at a , MN
471 --a20(-.)
1--th
PlYmoutn, MN 35447
'M5
MN 55-91
41- 16!
14th
4 i4 -
o4m odyi-q
4 4 3 -
-I rA." I I .—,
'A.16 so
ko
F rf ow v I IN 4AJ
041 -2"?:w
I
Drab VoJetii,
4801 W. 170L�!
r!dJM,A, MN 554.24
121 -BEj.--jl
341,) f lymouth
Plymnuth. HN 55447
f 55"V-
r )y a !say, MtV 2-
70 41
-si mild n an
-hor it
Iry
W&
c4
WILL
CF
L011A LN. HOPPE
I, LORA N. HOPPE, whose full name is Lora Noerenberg Hoppe,
of Hennepin County, Minnesota, make and declare this my will, and I revoke
all wills and codicils made by me prior to the date of this will.
ARTICLE ONE
I direct my executors, hereinafter named, to pay all of my
funeral expenses, expenses of last illness, claims allowed in tine adminis-
tration of my estate, federal and state income and gift taxes owed by me at
the time of my death, expenses of the administration of my estate and all
death taxes of any character (including interest and penalties) imposed by
reason of my death with respect to any property treated as a Fart of my
taxable estate for purposes of any such tax. My executors shall not
recover any portion of any such taxes from the recipient of an), part of the
property constituting my taxable estate whether disposed of by this will ar
not.
ARTICLE TWO
I give the following legacies to those of the following persons
who survive me:
v A. To my sister-in-law, CLARA S-NIITi-I (Ales. Archie K. Smith)
now living in Willmar, Minnesota, if she survives me, the
sum of Five Thousand Dollars ($S, 000. 00).
r-�
B. To GUSTAV DELCOUf1T, of Minneapolis, \linnesota, if he
survives me, one thousand (1, 0010) shares of G,•ai,.'t Bult
Dreweries, Inc. capital stock.
r
r� C. To Alt'1'ilU1t IIABULItT, of Ai►nnc;irolis, Minnesota, if he
sut•vive.3 mc, one thous;md (1. 000 shares of Grain Belt
Inc. capital stock. if he doe:3 not survi .•e me,
thk ti I ,,ire said shares to his wife, h1,01UX 11ARTLT'1', if
slit, :.urvives me.
1). TO the ll\IVE11S1TY OF Allt:\1:50't':\, for n111sculll p1lrposea, .111
SPO.Cllllells of moose, ducks and oihc-r bird.'; llov. co:ltailled ill 1Tl
holue on Crystal Bay, Lake Minnetonka.
E. To Alt'1'HU11' I1ARTEi'T, I. LORA IIAR'ri 11T, and EVELYN'' S'1'l1:NIUS,
jointly and absolutely, or to the survivors or survivor of them, all
of my furniture and household goods, personal effects and ornaments,
excluding therefrom, however, those small remembrance items
disposed of by a list left with my attorney, henry NV. ilaverstock.
F. To RAY FORDS, if he survives me, any and all automobiles and all
tools, machinery and contents of the outbuildings on my humestead
propertiiiBn Crystal Bay and Maxwell lay, Lake Minnetonka, abso-
lutely,/one thousand (1, 000) shares of Grain Belt Breweries, Inc.
capital stock.
G. To ELVERA ERICKSON, of Mound, )Minnesota, five hundred (500)
shares of Grain Belt Breweries, Inc. capital stock if she is in my
employ at the time of my death.
H. Except to the extent, if any, that I have made gifts or suggested
gifts under this Article and under ARTICLE THREE to relatives,
I have not made and do not make_ any provision. for any other gifts
to them.
ARTICLE THREE
I have left with my attorney, HENRY W. HAVERSTOCK, a memorandum
dated April 8, 1965, containing directions as to disposition of certzlin items,
and I direct my executors to carry out my wishes s expressed in tha` mern,,-
randum, e:.cept only that the gift to MARGARE'I' DELCOURT shall be
stricken therefrom, and I have added a gift to CLARENCE STELLIIACHER
to said memorandum.
P.RTICLE FOUR
A. I give, devise and bequeath all of ni-., real estate in Section 9,
�L
Township 117, Range 23, Ilennepin County, Tvlinnesota, North of the center
line of County Road No. 51, at Lake Mirinetonl:a, subject to a life estate in
favor of 11AY VOT DE in two and sixty one hundredths (2. 601, acres thereof
C, described as follows:
.� Commencing at the intcrs;ection of t1w ccriter line of County Road
-� No. 51 with the enter line of French load, so-called; !hence
Westerly alone, said Count- 110:1d to the %V(-sLot line of of Four (4);
lhenrc A:orth to th1- N'orthl�est corner of Saw Lot Vokir (4); thence
Ea.—;t on the lint. of :;aid Lot Vo11r W) to !hv rrn►rr9- lino n/ m.oitf
French Road, so-called; thence Southerly along said French Road
to beginning, Section 9, Toy.,nship 117, Range 23, Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
whereon is situated the dwelling house in which said RAY FORDE now lives,
to MINNESOTA CHAPTER of THE NATURE CONSERVANCY, INC., a
charitable corporation, with the request that the same be operated and
managed in its approximate natural state as a place whereon wild fowl and
other wild game will be allowed to congregate on this land as a natural
area.
It is my hope and expectation that the MINNESOTA CHAPTER
of THE NATURE CONSERVANCY, INC. shall maintain and operate this
property on an admissions basis or by other proper and suitable method, if
compatible with the stated use, whereby sufficient revenue will be obtained
for the conduct of a game refuge area.
If the devise and bequest under this Paragraph A of ARTICLE
FOUR set forth above to MINNESOTA CHAPTER of TIIE NATURE
CONSERVANCY, INC., a charitable corporation, is not acceptable to it,
then I give, devise and bequeath said property to IiENNEPIN COUNTY PARK
RESERVE DISTRICT upon the same terms and conditions as set forth her
above. If the devise and bequest to IIENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESLIiV3•:
DISTRICT is not acceptable to it, then I direct my executors to cause a
charitable corporation to be organized, with a perpetual charter, to receive
the devise and bequest under this Paragraph A of ARTICLE FOUR, upon the
same tc. rrns and for the same pui poses a5 set forth hereinabc•: e, said
n corporation to be known as "NOERENBf,nG NATURE AREA, INCORPORATED "
or other suitable name incorporatiiig the words ",X0ERENJ3i:RG NATUIt1.,
AREA," and such corporation shall be authorized by its articles and by- laws
to receive slid devise and bequest and administer the same as a nature area
in the same general manner as provided above in this Para;,,raph A of
AI:TICLE FOUR, for the use of the public under such rules and regulations
as said charitable corporation shall prescribe, for public purposes.
B. I give, devise and bequeath all the residue of my personal
property and all of my real estate in Section 9, Township 117, Ran,,,> 23,
Hennepin Coiinty, Minnesota, South of the center line of County Road
No. 51 and located adjacent to and along Crystal Bay, Lake Minnetonl.:a,
to HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE DISTRICT, absolutely, as a
special gift and bequest to be known. as "Noerenberg Memorial County Park
Gift, " for the purpose of establishing a memorial park in memory of my
father, 'Frederick C. Noerenberg, and my mother, Johanna Noerenberg, to
be known as "Noerenberg Memorial County Park, " pursuant to the provisions
of Chapter 512 of the Laws of Minnesota for the year 1961 and other applicable
laws of the State of Minnesota covering the establishment of public parks.
Said land shall be operated and devoted to public park purposes as an arboretum
for flowers,. shrubs and trees, with suitable pathways and decorative features.
I direct that the said HENNEPIN COUNTY PARI� RESERVE DISTRICT, in
utilizing this Crystal Bay area for general display garden purposes, use tite
earnings of the funds which are given herein to the District for the purpose
of maintenance of that area. This indication as to use shall not imply ctnv
authority whatsoever in the District to use the land for picnic purposes, fcu:,
camping, for boat or water raft a . -� � 1 g, c 1 ur �.hing, or for. any uses incompatible
IT
with that of a general display garden area.
._..
I request that RAY W01', DE, if living at the time of my death,
r`
be employed as superintendent of this garden area on Crystal Bay.
n
I regiicst that the: HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVL;
f'
DISTRICT plant ever,, • and other suitable shrubs indigenous to our
climate to that area of L.ie property dcsrribcd tuuter this Paragraph B of
ARTIC LE FOUR which is South of County highway 1 and East of the
present dwellings house and extending Last from the house as far as the
line of the Webster property on the East of this land. It is my hope that
the District will thereby improve and beautify the area for the purposes
above stated.
I direct that my executors shall have the dwelling house
on said land demolished as soon after my death as possible, and have
erected on the site where the dwelling stood a suitable arbor of modest
design, wherein or whereon a plaque shall be placed which shall be
engraved with the following sentiment: "Noerenberg Memorial County
Park Is Dedicated to the Use of the Public in Memory of the
Frederick and Johanna Noerenberg Family Who Once Lived Here. "
If the devise and bequest as set forth under this Paragraph B
of ARTICLE FOUR is not acceptable to said HE\NEPIN COUNTY PARK
RESERVE DISTRICT, then I direct that my executors shall cause a
charitable corporation to be organized with a perpetual charter, to receive
this devise and bequest. Such corporation shall be named "NOERENBERG
MEMORIAL PARK, INCORPORATED, " or a suitable name incorporating
the words "NOERENBERG MEMORIAL PARK, " and shall be authorized by
its articles of incorporation and by-laws to receive said residue of my
�) estate, real and personal, and administer the same for public park and
recreational purposes in the same general manner as set fortis under this
Paragraph 13, all to the end that the public shall be entitled to use said land
freely for the purpose; indicated -14,,ov e.
ARTICLE FIVE
(`- I nominate ARTHUII HARTI:R'I and HENRY W. HAVEIISTOCK
S as executors of this my will. I request that none of my executors be
required to furnish bend as executor in excess of the sum of Twenty- five
01 ".
Thousand Dollars ($25, 000. 00). If either of the persons names as executor
be deceased or be unable for other reason to serve as an executor, then the
remaining executor shall act as sole executor, subject to the qualification
that if said HENRY W. HAVERSTOCK be unable to serve, then
I.ARRY R. HEN EMAN, in the first instance, or some other member of
the firm of Cant, Haverstock, Gray, Plant & Mooty shall be appointed as
executor in place and instead of said HENRY W. HAVERSTOCK.
1N TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have on this day of March,
1970, hereunto set my hand and seal.
The foregoing instrument, consisting of six (6) pages of typewritten
matter, was on this day of March, 1970, signed at the end thereof and
on the margin of the first five (5) pages of typewriting by the above named
I ORA IN. IIOPPE, in the presence of us and each of its, and the same
her declared and published as her will in the presence of us and each of
and at her request and in her presence and in the presence of each other t: r
have this day hereunto Subsr.ribed our names as attesting witnesses thereto.
41
v•. 1(, (,�..� �/�,_T/,�_l.�t_� L (Yesidingat GC�C�Ic.c.cc.<%c�C•� Z/t�!jL
ltcsiding at —
/,
"1tt� 4• C� f�% -�c_ ► Residing ate. ,......�.� �J.
f -- -- -
AGENDA: NOERENBERG MEMORIAL COUNTY PARK ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING
November 1, 1984, 4:00 p.m., Freshwater Biological Institute
1. Review 1978 Master Plan
Narrative
Maps
Model
2. Disucss the previsions of the Will
3. Review Inventory of other Floral Display Gardens in the Metro area
4. Discussion regarding Orono's concerns about Noerenberg Memorial County Park
* zoning
• background information
5. General discussion
6. Next meeting time
11
INVENTORY OF FLORAL DISPLAY GARDENS IN THE M
Garden Owner Yr. Est. Size Theme Fees Annual Use
U.M. Arboretum 1958
Como Conservatory
St. Paul 1915
Normandale Comm.
College 1976
Arneson Acres/ 1981
Edina Arboretum:
City of Edina
Mpls. Rose Garden/
Lyndale Park 1907
Mpls. Pk. Bd
675 acres Series $2/ind. Ind. and group tours; walks and bus
(their bus), 1 reg weekly tour (unr
no theme 50t A/25tC
open, except ind./ mostly groups
for fall and guided tours with volunteers, but r
spring show when more volunteers
theme may be charge was begun 3 years ago to
evident help pay fuel costs in winter
2 ac. authentic
Japanese free
15-20 ac formal garden
is 1 acre free
��.-w►�,t.� �ioatrs
informal, ind. and group
use from babies to senior citizens;
used for marriage ceremonies too
limited; not highly promoted
2iac. annual and free Rose garden is part of Lyndale Parts
rock garden used by individuals; no guided tour
f ree
-loise Butler/
Mpls. Park Bd. 1906 20 ac. wildflower and bird sanctuary strictly a preserve; n(
ann/per. began handout given for individual
rebuilding
fall '83
Mpls. Armory
Gardens 1913 discontinued n '60's; will be replaced during the ne)
conservatory and per(
d
INVENTORY Of FLORAL DISPLAY GARDENS IN THE METRO AREA
Garden Amer Yr. Est. Size Theme Fees Annual Use Comments Contact Person
U.M. Arboretum 1958 675 acres Series S2/ind. Ind. and group tours; walks and bus show how annuals, perennials, etc. Mike Heger
(their bus), 1 reg weekly tour (unresv) can be used in personal gardens 443-2460
educational , 100,000 annual visitors
Com Conservatory
St. Paul 1915 no theme 50C A/25CC
open, except ind./ mostly groups
for fall and guided tours with volunteers, but need
spring show when more volunteers
theme may be charge was begun 3 years ago to
evident help pay fuel costs in winter
'.ormandale Corr. informal, ind. and grc,up
College 1976 2 ac. authentic use from babies to senior citizens;
Japanese free used for marriage ceremonies too
'rneson Acres/ 1981 15-20 ac formal garden limited; not highly promoted
Edina Arboretum' is 1 acre free
City of Edina �ueMrt� �'IaatrS
",ls. Rose (Arden/2iac. annual and free Rose garden is part of Lyndale Park;
lrndale Park 1907 rock garden used by individuals; no guided tours
Pk. Bd
traditional - palm dome in center Les Day
economic house in one wing 489-0868
ferns; perennials, annuals
Japanese landscape architect did planning
land given by college and developed by Joann Rice
a grant from Sears Roebuck; Normandale 830-9306
maintains grounds;use of volunteers
Fdina Garden Council plants flowers in Rick Jacobson
q reenhouse and transplants to park.
G;ft from Morten Arneson; 9 garden
clubs with over 150 members
formal layout; annuals and perennials; Mary Lerman
rebuilding rock garden to resemble 348-4448
English garden; handout given for tours
free
Oise Butler/
"- s. Park Bd. 1906 26 ac. wildflower and bird sanctuary strictly a preserve; no formal gardens
ann/per, began handout given for individual
rebuilding
fall '83
Mary Lerman
Mpls. Armury
Gardens 1913 discontinued in '60's; will be replaced during the next 2 years with sculpture garden/ Mary Lerman
conservatory and perennial display
PARK RESERVE
BAKER
CARVER
CROW. HASSAN
ELM CREEK
HYLAND LAKE
LAKE REBECCA
MURPHY HANAEHA'1
REGIONA' PARKS
SAVANT LAKE
CLEARY LAKE
CLIFTONE FRENCH
COON RAPIDS DAM
EAGLE LAKE
FISH LAKE
JAMESW WILKIE
LAKE SARAH
SPRING LAKE
SPECIAL USE AREAS
ARTHURE ALLEN WILDLIFE
SANCTUARY
BAKER PARK GOLF COURSE
CLEARY LAKE GOLF COURSE
HYLAND HILLS SKI AREA
NOE RE NBE RG MEMORIAL PARK
WAWATASSO ISLAND
WILD GOOSE CHASE ISLAND
TRAIL CORRIDORS
NORTH HENNEPIN TRAIL
BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS
DAVID LATV&ANO
CHAIR
GOLDEN VALLEY
WILLIAM N BOTN►ON
VICE CHAIR
ST LOUIS PIMP
.;UD11 N S ANOEPSON
SL OUAH NGTON
PATRICIA O BAKER
MINNEAPOL IS
fN1RLt► A BOVINE
MAPLE PLAIN
WILLMM I NOL6100011
MINNEAPOLIS
SCOTTL Ntw"01
MINNEAPOI IL
VONNJ NARTENBURO
SUPEMNTENOENT A
SECRETARY TO IHE BOARD
Hennepin County Park Reserve District
3a00 County Road 24 • Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359 • Telephone 612-473.4693
TO: Noerenberg Advisory Committee
FROM: Marty Jessen
SUBJECT: November 29 M27ig
DATE: November 14, 1984
Just a reminder that our next meeting is scheduled
for Thursday, November 29. This will again be held
at the Gray Freshwater Biological Institute at 4:OC ,..m.
The agenda for the meeting includes the following items:
1. Report and discussion on the Arboretum
2. Interpretation of the will
3. Discussion of themes for the garden
If you are unable to attend, please let me know.
NOE RENBLRG MEMOrt I AL COUNTY PARE;
ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING
NOVEMBER 1 , 1.98114
4: ()U F'. M.
Present: Richard Gray, Chairman
Mrs. Henry Doerr
Mrs. James Fish
MicF:ey Gf�ldman
JoEllen Hurr
Bob I.:ojetif)
Absent: Glen Ray
Goorge Pector
lf•-+rb Peterson
J. Diann Goetten
Michael Heger
Barbar,.; t::aAVrwc?Y
Dob Murgaa
Tun: Rile,
Harh Ser'w=-t
Fiennep i n County Park Rt.1,5er,,e District Staff Pr esc! )t :
Marty Je3sen
Don 1(i ng
Judy McDowell
PrC)y19 n�of the W; 1,1_
Richard Gray cipeia,d the meeting by reviewing than provisiono of the
Will. Gray referred spec14iciAll t to the pro,i•:,iun that indicated
trust fund Par rfinqi bf- used f or mof lit wfi-nr:_e E;ur-pu_,es ern: y. Ur ay
called attention to the ward tating that a definitiorf
„a the term ►5 rte-sled in order that it be Actermined whether
develapinent of the pj%, I. is to be included under tlri defirrit 1..�n. Wi',:h
the commitLve's approval, Gray indicated that ht' would cant rict one or
more of the involved lawyers ,and get their i ni t�rprstati on and
understanding of the to m ai intended by Mrs. Hoppe. Gray added that
in doing so, the pos!,i.bt l i ty exists that development would not �)e
considered a maintenar►ce function and that funds for these purposes
may have to come from cu_1t 5 t 0', _.ou.► cr-•- .
Qr_W_c Concerns
As spokesperson for the City of Oruno, Diann Goetten indicated here
concern that th(_- civve l opment of the p.-+.rk be wi th-,ir: the _rainy
standards, of the c,ty. Goetten Stated that: Noerenberg Park .s located
in a residential Zane of the city. Please refer- to %epca.r--?tc report
for Zoning st-.ndard,which apply to this location.
In response to these standard: the committee made the follcvwing
comments:
Gray stated that these are not Lioreasonable standards and thatras
long a-.� they are complied with, he felt there should be no
prutilem i with development of the park: in this respect.
Barbara I aerwer referred to a leatter addressed to the ' j t:y Ca !nr_ i 1
by the Orono Committee for the Protection of Nuarenber g Mepmor i a 1
Pat k which requested re%tr ictive part, ing l imited to Lc paei%"nger
Vehi( IVs. It. w.s5 explained that this was riot a stanc!ard pr,er tly
set by the c t ty . but a ► ,i+quost by :a nei ghhorhoot' group. 11
meTamuet s of ttt, ummittoo will ►or'eivo= + _opr, of this I&ttcr.
It was gUeStioned whether- thr•- 75 foot set,Iacl: standards would
affect the rebuilding of the gazebo. Marty Jessen indicated that
is not D problem since the uistrict had a.ready received e.pproval
;r.om fwono to go ahead wi-, hi:. pro rect.
Dort ten proceeded with another rLincprr, of Urnno's, that communication
bP+ween the Di,3trict anti the city be t_ontineed throughout this
planning effort. Goetten reviewed the secluenc:e of events which
involved the original advisory committee :Anil kwhi cFr let! to Noer _nberg
being removed from thr! 1979 Capital Improvement Flan of t:1'e Di —strict.
?n response, Gray requested the following:
- that Dick Pinson, City Administrator for Orono, r e( ei vr. ,_-)pies
of min-itns from .ill meeting- of +his con-mitt-1;
that -4 joint meetjrvg with i-teighbors and citize:nC of Oront: be
e,cliedttled 1rv-furr any recommendation4, are made by the cor.,mittee.
Floral Di iwl, ar'den
Jesseen distr ibuted c, sheet- listiarg various floral display yarder-rs
throughout they Metro area and re ated i n#ormati an, i . =-r. , year
established, Dize. theme, fews, annual u,;e, additional comments, And
contact person. Je_,st!n noted that thf- garden wi+h the most similarity
to Nuerenberg was, that U.of M. Arboreteum which was march lrrger. Tht
committees ganer.-illy at;r eed +h,�t reagardles--,, of what occ_lrrred at
Noerent,erg there would bF? dtipl ir_ation but that every attempt should bt
made +iot to duplicate d&r ec+ these other garden^ . Themes suggested by
the :omrfjtteep rrtcluderi Vi tut ian -And Old fnyl:yh.
Master Plan
With the aid of a model, Don King reviewed the original master
plan, painting out various features and spatial elements.
Next Meetings Thursday, November 29, 4 p.m.
Gray Freshwater Biological Institute
1. Mike Heger will present information on the Arbor etLIm.
2. Interpretation of the Will.
3. Discussion of themes for the Garden.
SEQUENCE OF EVENTS RE.
NOERENBERO MEMORIAL COUNTY PARE!'.
Planning Effort of 1977-1979
1-12-72 Lora Hoppe dies
10-02-72 Hearing on will
12--3-74 Noerenberg Gardens Advisory Committee is e5tablirhed.
11-30-.77 Committee recommends approval of Master Plan and sends letter to
Druno City Council recommending:
Master Plan
Phase I * 350, i,00
Phase II 900,000
Total * 1,250,000
4-27-78 Hennepin County Park. Reserve District (HCPRD) appears before City
Council for conceptual approval and also indicates support for
public participation efforts.
6--24--78 Neighborhood meeting headed by Allan Raymond involves 20 residents
and 2 HCPRD people. This is the first time citizens actually saw
Master Plan.
7-1s►•-78 City Council directs letter to Clifton French, Superintendent o{
HCPRD, expressing residents' concerns and a=,_king for additional
time to review Master Plan.
8-1-78 Orono committee for the Protection of Naeren j Memorial Part
sends letter to Mayor Von Nest staing concerns regarding Master
Plan;
-inconsistent with terms of the will
-negative environmental impact
--unsound municipal use and planning
....-imprudent use of public funding
9-5--78 Dick Denson, city administrator. sends latter to French, HCPRD,
and i ts.-Qhwles Weaver, Chairman, Metro Council, stating *Aw
concern that Metro Council had awarded $350,000 contract to HCPRD
for development of Noerenberg park:.
9-11-78 Weaver, Metro Council, replies to above letter stating that a
contract was not awarded and acknowledged city's concern with the
situation.
4-26-79 Denson sends letter to Weaver stating concern that contract of
$266,400 has now been awarded to HCPRD, restates that city has
never had opportunity to review proposed plans and asks for delay.
5-16-79 Benson sends letter- to French restating prior correspondence,
concerns and urges cooperation between city and HCPRD.
5--23•-79 Weaver r-esp(--)nd,:i 'to Bens,on',3 letter of 4-26 stating that contract
of $266,401) was awarded and approved 4-12-79. He also questions
city's approval of Piaster Flan and again recognizes continuing
need to involve citizens.
5-29--79 Benson sends letter to French asking for letter in response to
call of 45 days prior. French had said he would contact cities
after their next hoard meeting. Benson has heard nothi.ng.
City sends letter to Weaver stating the lack of communication from
French and that the situation is arousing COmmunit•y concern.
7-24-79 Benson sends letter to French stating his understanding that HCPRD
has r-emoveri the Nuer-enberg project. from 1979 funding program.
CITY OF ORONO ZONING STANDARDS AS REGARDS NOERENBERG MEMORIAL PARK
Reported by Diann Goetten, Chair, City of Orono Planning Commission
Noerenberg Memorial Park is located in the LR-1A (One Family Lakeshore
Residential District) district. A public park is a permitted use. The LR-lA
district under the R-IA district is intended to provide a district which will
allow a combination of low density residential development. The proposed land
use may not endanger the quality of storm water run off into Lake Minnetonka.
Because of the location of the district near the lake, special regulations are
necessary to protect those natural resources from the effects of dense devel-
opment.
Within 75' of shoreline, no excavating, filling, hardcover, temporary or
permanent structures are allowed; 75'-250', 25`,.', hardcover; 250'-500', 30t;
500' - 1,000`, 35% hardcover. (Hardcover i,, any structure, blacktop or other
material which interferes to any degree wits the direct absorption of rainfall
into the ground. Hardcover also includes oivel driveways and plastic bed
coverings w/o holes.
No trees within 75' of the shoreline with a diameter of 6" or more can be
removed without obtaining a permit from the City Council.
Preliminary planning would require a complete site plan, adhering to all
standards of the district and showing for example, all setbacks, elevation,
% dry buildable, % wetlands, existing hardcover (buildings, garages, sheds,
roads, walkways, accessory structures, etc.), septic system, well, etc. A
drainage plan would also be included.
The City Council mould look into the following needs:
- on site septic system
- need for additional toilet facilities
- traffic patterns
road vision
road entrance/s, exit/s
lighting
- estimate number of visitors
- park-ing
if narking on north side, safety concern crossing street
- hou,-s of operation
- nuriber of employees
- overall park lighting
- signage
A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) would be required for the following:
parkii,q lot/s
earth moving
grading
walls
greenhouse/s
Accessory Uses in the LR-IA district are: garages, fences, gazebo.
A varience to the code would be required for a dock. (A varience is required
because there is no residence located on the property.) It would probably be
best to apply for a joint use dock license. Some of the factors to consider are:
- how many slips
- policing of area
- lighting if any
- safety
- rip rapping (permit required)
August 1, 1978
Mr. Brad Van Nest
Mayor
City of Orono
P. 0. Box 66
Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323
RE. Development of Noerenberg Memorial Part:
Dear Mr. Van Nest:
The following statement briefly summarizes the position of
the signatories regarding the proposal by the Hennepin County
Park Reserve District to develop the Noerenberg Memorial Park.
The signatories basically represent only those nearby residents
who have become aware of the project.
We oppose the proposed development for the following reasons:
I. Inconsistent with the terms and intent of the Will of
Lora N. oppe.
A. Property on the north side of County Road 51 shall
"be operated and managed in its approximate natural
state as a place whereon wild fowl and other wild
game will be allowed to congregate on this land as
a natural area."
Operation and maintenance of this land by either
the Minnesota Chapter of the Nature Conservancy,
Inc., the Hennepin County Park Reserve District,
or if the bequest is unacceptable to either of the
u ;eve a charitable corporation as specified in thK,ty.
must be "upon the same terms and for the *%bf6 A,-',
purposes as set forth hereinabove."
B. Property on the south side of County Road 51 "shall
be operated and devoted to public park purposes as
an aboretum for flowers, shrubs and trees, with
suitable pathways and decorative features." Expressly
forbidden are uses of the land "for picnic purposes,
for camping, for boat or water craft launching, or
for any uses incompatible with that of a general
display garden area."
Mr. Brad Van Nest
August 1, 1978
Page 2
The will stipulates "that the Park Reserve District
plant evergreens and other suitable shrubs indigenous
to our climate in that area of the property extending
from the site of the dwelling house east as far as
the line of the Webster property" (now the Raymond
property). "It is my hope that the District will
thereby improve and beautify the area for the purposes
stated above."
C. Summary
While donation of the land for specified public park
purposes implies the need for public access, the will
clearly seeks to place severe limitations on the extent
of such access in order to maintain the land north of
County Road 51 in its "approximate natural state" as
a wildlife preserve, and the land north of County Road 51
as a memorial park to be devoted and operated as an
"arboretum for flowers, shrubs and trees", and for
"general display garden purposes". The specific
exclusion of uses of the land for picnics, camping,
boat launchings or any other "uses incompatible with
that of a general display garden area" as well as the
specific reference to plantings to be made east of the
dwelling house extending east to the Webster (Raymond)
property line clearly indicates that Mrs. Hoppe in her
will envisioned a modest public access to land that would
be more or less preserved in its natural state, in
harmony with its surroundings, and pleasing to her
immediate neighbors.
In the event that her intent for the land to be left
more or less in its natural state was unacceptable to
the Park Resemm1epdD4vtrict, Mrs. Hoppe provided in her "ttAmpd
will that the4weeutors shall cause a charitable VIX el
corporation to be organized for the same stated purposes.
II. Negative Environmental Impact
It has not been demonstrated to the residents that the
environmental impact of the project will not be adverse
in terms of its effects on wildlife, land and water as
well as the health, safety and welfare of the surrounding
residents with respect to the above as well as the specific
effects on residential property values, of litter, noise
and safety from additional traffic and people in the area,
additional local law enforcement costs, potential future
need of widening County Road 51, and the aesthetic impact
on the general sense of well being of the residents of the
community.
Mr. Brad Van Nest
August 1, 1978
Page 3
III. Unsound Municiple Use and Planning
A park or recreational development in a residential
community should enhance the value of surrounding
residential property and have a positive impact on the
lifestyle and general well being of the people already
residing in the area. Since the above effects of the
proposed project have not been demonstrated to the
community by the Park Reserve District, proceeding with
the project cannot be consistent with the responsibilities
of the Orono City Council and Planning Commission for the
sound use and planning of land within the municiple system
it serves.
IV. Imprudent Use of Public Funds
We find the proposed expenditure of approximately
$1,250,000 of public funds for this particular project
inconsistent with the realities and priorities of life
in Minnesota today. We reach the same conclusion regarding
the scope of the proposed five year Regional Park System
capital improvement program of $139,000,000. It will be
our intent to make our feelings well known to the 1979
legislature should such a recommendation be made.
With no invention of being all inclusive, and consistent with
the points raised above, we specifically seek to limit the
development and use of the land in the following manner:
1) That parking be forever restricted to 25 passenger vehicles
and no buses at one time, and that development of a parking
area not exceed what is practicAk�,4or-25 passenger vehicles.
2) That no entrance for public access be allowed within 150
yards of any private property line, no parking be allowed
south of County Road 51, no parking be allowed within 75
yards of County Road 51, and no parking be allowed within
150 yards of Old Crystal Bay Road.
3) That no support or visitor facility be constructed south
of County Road 51, within 150 yards of Old Crystal Bay
Road, or within 75 yards of County Road 51.
4) That visitor facilities be limited to washrooms, drinking
fountains, and telephones.
Mr. Brad Van Nest
August 1, 1978
Page 4
5) That access to the park be denied to the public betwr:en
November 1st and April 30th, and before 10:00 a.m. and
after 4:00 p.m. from May 1st to October 31st.
6) That adequate enforcement be provided by the Park Reserve
District to insure public compliance to park rules and
regulations.
7) That the park, in addition to the use exclusions specified
in the will, not be used for weddings or similar events.
In summary, the proposed project is unacceptable to us for the
reasons outlined above. We view ourselves as reasonable people
who are concerned with doing what is right in terms of the
betterment of the community at large as well as protection of
our own personal interests and the interest of the City of Orono.
This project places these natural concerns in opposition to one
another. It is our hope and belief that the subject can be
disposed of satisfactorily through the public mechanisms which
exist within the City of Orono for the protection of its citizens.
That is where the responsibility is focused. Should that not
occur, we are prepared to pursue the matter with every means at
our disposal to a satisfactory conclusion.
The following signatories appoint Allan Raymond or his designate
from within the group of signatories as spokesman at any event
requiring the signatories to be represented concerning the
Noerenberg Memorial Park Development.
Sincerely,
Orono Committee for the
Protection of the Noerenberg
Memorial Park.
MASTER PLAN FOR
NOERENBERG MEMORIAL COUNTY PARK
GARDEN AND SANCTUARY
BACKGROUND
IN 1972, AT THE BEQUEST OF MRS. LAURA HOPPE, THE HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE
DISTRICT ACQUIRED THE NOERENBERG FAMILY ESTATE, NOW CALLED THE NOERENBERG
MEMORIAL COUNTY PARK. THIS SITE IS LOCATED BETWEEN CRYSTAL AND MAXWELL BAYS
OF LAKE MINNETONKA WITHIN THE CITY OF ORONO. 1T CONSISTS OF TWO PARCELS,
15.98 ACRES SOUTH OF COUNTY ROAD 51 AND 57,83 ACRES NORTH OF COUNTY ROAD 51
FOR A TOTAL OF 73.81 ACRES. THERE IS APPROXIMATELY 6,230 FT. (1..: MI.) OF
SHORELINE ON MAXWELL BAY, 1,200 FT. (.23 MI.) OF SHORELINE ON CRYSTAL BAY AND
1,060 FT. (.20 MI.) OF SHORELINE ON THE CONNECTING NOERENBERG CHANNEL FOR A
TOTAL OF 8,490 FT. (1.61 MI.) OF SHDRELINE ON LAKE MINNETONKA. THIS LAND WAS
GIVEN TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE DISTRICT FOR CERTAIN USES ONLY AS
STATED IN THE WILL.
THE PROPERTY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF COUNTY ROAD 51 HAS BEEN GIVEN ".,. WITH THE
REQUEST THAT THE SAFE BE OPERATED AND MANAGED IN ITS APPROXIMATE NATURAL STATE
AS A PLACE WHEREON WILD FOWL AND OTHER WILD GAME WILL BE ALLOWED TO CONGREGATE
ON THIS LAND AS A NATURAL. AREA."
THE PROPERTY SOUTH OF COUNTY ROAD 51 ".., SHALL BE OPERATED AND DEVOTED TO
PUBLIC PARK PURPOSES AS AN ARBORETUM FOR FLOWERS, SHRUBS, AND TREES, WITH SUIT-
ABLE PATHWAYS AND DECORATIVE FEATURES. THIS INDICATION AS TO USE SHALL NOT
IMPLY ANY AUTHORITY WHATSOEVER IN THE DISTRICT TO USE THE LAND FOR PICNIC
PURPOSES, FOR CAMPING, FOR BOAT OR WATER CRAFT LAUNCHING, OR FOR ANY USES
iNCOMPATIBLE WITH THAT OF A GENERAL DISPLAY GARDEN AREA."
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE WILL, THE AREA NORTH OF COUNTY ROAD 51 WILL
BE DEVELOPED IN A NATURAL STATE AS A WILDLIFE SANCTUARY, FOR THE PURPOSES
OF DISCUSSION IN THIS MASTER PLAN, THIS PART OF THE SITE WILL BE REFERRED
TO AS THE SANCTUARY.
THE AREA SOUTH OF COUNTY ROAD 51 WILL BE DEVEI';Li, AS A GENERAL DISPLAY GARDEN.
FOR PURPOSES OF DISCUSSION IN THIS MASTER PL`, Tr.S PART OF THE SITE WILL BE
REFERRED TO AS THE GARDEN.
AS MENTIONED PREVIOUSLY, THIS SITE WAS FORMERLY THE NOERENBERG FAMILY ESTATE.
INCLUDED WITHIN THIS ESTATE WAS THE LARGE FAMILY HOME, GARAGE, BOATHOUSE/
rw%--,GAZEBO, PUMPHOLISE AND APPROXIMATELY ONE HALF ACRE OF FLOWEK GARDENS ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF CO. RD. 51; AND A SEPARATE RESIDENCE, BARN, MISCELLANEOUS
OUTBUILDINGS, WATERTOWER, A14D A SMALL GREENHOUSE NORTH OF CO. RD. 51.
A PROVISION OF THE WILL REQUIRED THAT THE FAMILY HOUSE BE TORN DOWN AS SOON
AS POSSIBLE AND A MEMORIAL ARBOR BE ERECTED ON THE HOUSE SITE. THE RESIDENCE
ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ROAD WAS GIVEN AS A LIFE ESTATE IN FAVOR OF
MR. RAY FORD, LONG TIME CARETAKER FOR THE NOERENBERG FA'HILY.
A SYNOPSIS OF OTHER HORTICULTURAL DISPLAY FACILITIES IN THE METROPOLITAN
AREA
THERE ARE SEVERAL FACILITIES WITHIN THE METROPOLITAN AREA WHICH MAY BE
COM-ARED TO THE NOERENBERG GARDEN.
1. THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM
THIS FACILITY CLOSELY FITS THE ABOVE DEFINITION OF AN ARBORETUM. ITS
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE IS TO TEST AND DEVELOP ORNAMENTAL PLANTS HARDY TO
MINNESOTA. SEVERAL PLANT VARIETIES NOW MARKETED BY LOCAL NURSERIES
WERE DEVELOPED AT THE ARBORETUM. PROVIDING OUTDOOR RECREATIONAL OPPOR-
TUNITIES IS AN IMPORTANT BUT SECONDARY FUNCTION OF THE ARBORETUM; AND
CONSISTS PRINCIPALLY OF VIEWING VARIOUS COLLECTIONS, PARTICULARLY
WHEN THEY ARE IN BLOOM.
2. LAKE HARRIET ROSE GARDEN
THIS IS CONSIDERED A DISPLAY GARDEN, BUT MUCH MORE SPECIALIZED THAN THE
NOERENBERG GARDEN WILL BE. THE PRIMARY EMPHASIS (AS THE NAME IMPLIES)
IS THE DISPLAY OF VARIOUS ROSES. SEVERAL SMALL BEDS OF OTHER FLOWERS
ARE INCLUDED, BUT THESE ARE SECONDARY IN SIGNIFICANCE TO THE ROSES.
3. ELOISE BUTLER WILDFLOWER GARDEN
WHILE THIS FACILITY IS CALLED A GARDEN, IT IS PRIMARILY AN ENRICHED
WOODS WITH TRAILS. THOUGH IT IS NATURAL LOOKING, WILDFLOWERS ARE IN-
TENSELY PLANTED THROUGHOUT. THE EMPHASIS IS ON WILDFLOWERS AS INDIVIDUAL
ITEMS OF INTEREST. THIS AREA IS SIMILAR TO THE PROPOSED NOERENBERG
SANCTUARY, ALTHOUGH NOERENBERG IS LARGER AND EMCOMPASSES A GREATER
VARIETY OF PLANT COMMUNITY TYPES.
4. COMO PARK CONSERVATORY
THE CONSERVATORY IS PRIMARILY AN INDOOR DISPLAY OF TROPICAL PLANTS.
SEASONAL SHOWS OF CERTAIN FLOWERING PLANTS SUCH AS CHRYSANTHEMUM ARE
ALSO FEATURED.
NORT14PVP K114G TEST GARDEN (COMMERCIALLY OWNED)
THIS AREA IN EDEN PRAIRIE IS OPERATED BY THE NORTHRUP KING SEED COMPANY
TO TEST VARIOUS SEEDS THE COMPANY PRODUCES. WHILE THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC
FACILITY, THE PUBLIC IS PERMITTED TO VIEW THE AREA; BUT, CLEARLY, THE
PURPOSE 1S RESEARCH AND TESTING.
WHILE NUMBERS OF VISITORS TO THESE FACILITIES ARE NOT AVAILABLE, OBSER-
VATIONS OF THE PUBLIC AREAS INDICATE A HIGH LEVEL OF USE. THE NORTHRUP
KING TEST GARDEN PROBABLY RECEIVES LESS BECAUSE IT 15 NOT PUBLICIZED.
UNIQUENESS WITHIN THE METROPOLITAN AREA
THE ABOVE FACILITIES WITHIN THE METROPOLITAN AREA SHOULD NOT BE DUPLICATED
AT THE NOERENBERG SITE.
THERE ARE CURRENTLY NO GENERAL PUBLIC DISPLAY GARDENS IN THE METROPOLITAN
AREA. THEREFORE, A GARDEN SUCH AS THIS IS CLEARLY IN THE SPECIALIZED
CLASSIFICATION OF ZOOS, CONSERVATORIES AND PLANETARIUMS, IN THA.? OPJE OF EACH
IS USUALLY CONSIDERED SUFFICIENT FOR A tFIETROPOL 1 T,44 AREA.
PLANNING P
ROCS
PRIOR SS AND (1 ECTIVES
ADVISORY PREPARATION
THIS c:OhMJ oMNI TTEE WA OF THE DCVELOPI NT p
FOR TNP EE WAS TO ESTABLIS►p LAN F
OR
REPRES SITE,�NTSHIp THIS
CLUBS, EMA7ICI BY N HARK RESERVE 1974, ThE r., t1E • A r'ITIZLNS •
MONO• �I�RSIT ERESTEp CITI COM4 o�TRICT IN pE RAL PURSE �JF
Y OF M1jNNESOTq SS LIKING NEAR LVE p-VP CI'ING THE p,.JV
THE COh�,' TT LA►VDSCApE A THEI TE, Cp�S 1 S TS GF
GENERAL _�� E COLLECTED I KAORET AND RAL GARDEN
RESERVE D C AND REV' INPUT REGARDIr � CITY OF
ISTRICT STAFF. END THE PLANS AS SIRED G�tR1�E
CLUBS, 1ARE WAS bEyEL THEY byERE FO B, TS FROM TEDTHE
'C%EP,'N SERVICE CLU9S LOPED 9Y TpESS,IE BY TFE PARK
C AND ppr C
Pam'-- COUNTY
SEA• INFO � TIONONALIN EREE AND D'STRIBUT
PR`LIMI IN J Rhy�TI EST
LtVE FROM r GROUPS IN MI TO GARDEN
WHICH EBEEN
�NROGRAM RICH THIS INF R 7.1ON OrNq'RES �POLIS/
GIVEN THE D RIOD'CALLY REV UTILIZED 'N oFoNAI S I S COLLECTED
AND ►'ENNEP IN I REC T I ON OF THE RI SLAT I NG BASIS FOR A
� GARDEN COUVTY PARK R WILL, INpUEWER 8Y THE C0I"�41TTEE. THE D�LOPMENT
60RE%44 0BE DE%t ESERVE DI FROM THE
OTHERS R Bo
LOPED AS q G STRICT CITIZENS
IN HE IN TME. ANI CAL GAR E7VERAL PUBLIC AFF I ADVISORY
THE /'ETROp hr TROPOLITAN EN' SUCH A FLIC DISPLANY GARDEN SLAG
COhMITTEE
►'ETROPOLITAN '� AREA. TREA ANp WILLApILITY WIROVI LL GARDEN UGGEST THAT
NDT
RATHER
To BETTER (1VDERST AREA; PERKS IN I* STATE OF 8ERGARDF WILDE A GARDEN ELLEMENTLIC4TE � AN
AND Co tyPA AlA THE C MINNESOTA. BE LNIQUE IN jOWTHE
H LACKING
SP ,AN ApBORE OR RE AN ARBORCTLM,T OF DI SPLAY GARDEN THE
I T LAYING DI FFER OTANICAL GARDEN CAL GARDEN AND
DISPLAY IT S NECESS
REGIONS NoT NECES DIFFERENT ORNvr TAL TREES SH AS I GARDEN Y TO
IS AN AREA,
AND ST 11 INCL
SET
EPHSS1 ALS . AN ,gECESSARl�y ALL THE PL 7, VINE FOR GROWL AND
IS p RBOR NCL S OTHER P
IS NOT p LACED ETUM DIF UDE FO iICH CArV BE LANTS,
d• I LACED ON WOODY p FERS FROM RArtAL BEDS OR GROW IN
OF LAY ANY ANY PAARTICU L�TS'OUSUP tREAS I BOTM ICAL GARDEN S OF '�1UAL5
t N T PARTICULAR
AND SC'ErlT'FI CSTUD T NOT EON EFFOR 1 S LANTS 1I CAL GARDEN HAT THE
ARBORETA FOR DISP MADE TOP DIFFER FROh' E�HASIS
E"p�S 1 S AND BOTAN t LAY, 9Ui, ALS CANTOR CRITICAL
R 1 T 1 I A
TO AID T' RESEARCH AND GARDENS ARE F �L E OLLECTI�S
fER STUDY SCIENTIF SMAT �Wr1INAT'0N
A BACEOUS DISPLAYS.INDIVIDUAL V,qR STUDY PLANTS �AtjD VE AS
DISPLAYLITT ARRA THEIR GREATEST
GARDEN, BY
LE E�*SIS IS �� COLLECTIONS
Camp
E S I T I GARDEt A/ NOT CONTRARANST VEN
ALSO Erp TH tW GE AS'C�L SIZES HERBAGE TO
LEISURE- ACTIVIT�SI ZES APPR S OF PLANTS CjN'T BUT ARE �PRFS ORAL DISPLAYS
ArJD EVALLwTI�I. SERF -AS 13OTAN' ON L OF pl T � CO,tipOSITTD IN DESI PLAN T
G,gRD LA GNED
NdD a RIALS AND GARDENING'- A DISPLAY
R�RETA El�� SUCY
THIS FACILITY WILL BE UNIQUE NOT ONLY TO THE METROPOLITAN AREA BUT ALSO
TO THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. THE NEAREST SIMILAR FACILITY IS THE DISPLAY
GARDEN WITHIN THE BOERNER BOTANICAL GARDEN IN MILWUAKEE, WISCONSIN WHICH
IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 12 MILES SOUTHWEST OF DOWNTOWN MILWAUKEE A14D DRAWS
OVER 1,000,000 VISITORS PER YEAR.
THE METROPOLITAN AREA LACKS A PUBLIC DISPLAY GARDEN AM PIE 'DEMAND APPEARS
TO BE SUFFICIENT TO WARRANT HAVING ONE. THE QUESTION 15 THEN RAISED WHETHER
THE NOERENBERG SITE IS CONDUCIVE TO SATISFYING THE DISPLAY GARDEN NEED.
SEVERAL FACTORS INDICATE THAT IT 15.
1. ACQUISITION OF LAND
THE 73.81 ACRES WITH 1.61 MILES OF SHORELINE ON LAKE MINNETONKA WERE
GIVEN FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING A DISPLAY GARDEN AND SANCTUARY.
IN ADDITION TO THE LAND, STOCK CERTIFICATES WERE GIVEN WHICH PROVIDE
INTEREST INCOME THAT WILL BE USED TO HELP DEFRAY OPERATING EXPENSES.
2. HERITAGE OF THE SITE
THE SITE WAS A PRIVATE ESTATE WITH A SIGNIFICANT PRIVATE GARDEN. IT IS
APPROPRIATE TO DEVELOP A GARDEN AT LEAST A3 ATTRACTIVE AS THAT WHICH
ONCE EXISTED THERE. THIS SITE IS ALSO LOCATED WITHIN THE ESTATE AREA
OF THE LAKE MINNETONKA REGION WHICH MAKES THE DEVEL-OPMENT f�S A GARDEN A
VERY COMPATIBLE LAND USE.
A NUMBER OF GARDENS OF THIS TYPE THROUGHOUT TFEE COUNTRY ARE L KATED ON
FORMER ESTATES WHICH WERE BEQUEATHED TO THE PUBLIC.
3. PHYSICAL SETTING
THE SITE IS LOCATED ON LAKE MINNETONKA, THE LARGEST LAKE IN THE METRO-
POLITAN AREA AND IS CURRENTLY THE LARGEST SINGLE PUBLIC LAKESHORE
OWNERSHIP ON THE LAKE. THE COMBINATION OF LAKE ORIENTATION AND SITE
CHARACTER MAKES THIS AN EXTREMELY ATTRACTIVE SETTING FOR A DISPLAY
GARDEN.
RELAT I Ot ISH I P OF SITE TO LOCAL CC lUN I TY AND METROPOL 1 TAN AREA
THE SITE IS LOCATED W1TMjJ*TTK CITY OF ORONO WHICH IS WITHIN THE DEVELOPING
RING OF SUBURBS IN TME.YGW~ST MltNEAPOLIS PLAN41NG SECTOR OF THEIMETRO-
POL I TAN COUNCIL. THE URBMJ!^SERV I CE AREA AS SHOWI"I "' THE DEVELOPMENT FRA -EWORK
PLAN OF THE MJ_TROPOL I TAN COUNCIL INCLUDES WiST OF I TY OF ORCYJO. THE
SOUTHERN PORTICfJ OF THE CITY AROUND LAKE MINNETONt, INCLUDED IN THE 14
UP.BA4 SERVICE AREA. THE NOERENBERG SITE IS WITHIN 1�, CATEGORY.
THE CITY'S COMPREHE-P;SIVE GUIDE PLAN (AUGUST 1.97b) IDENTIFIES AND RECOGNIZES
THE NOEREIBERG MEMORIAL COU•ITY PARK AS EXISTING WITHIN THE COwuNl TY'S
DEVELOPMENT.
TRAVEL TO THE SITE FROM OTHER PARTS OF THE "E TkOPOLITAN AREA IS BY PRIVATE
AUTO AND PUBLIC BUS TRANSPORTATION.
.,4
THE SITE IS LOt,AiED 15 MILES FROM DOW1JTOMI MINNEAPOLIS VIA U.S.
HIGHWAY 12, COUNTY ROADS 15 Am 51.
SCHEDULED BUS SERVICE OCCURS BETWEEN DOWNTOWN M1t4NEAPOLI3 AND THE
SITE BY WAY OF ROUTE 51, MOUND - WAYZATA. THIS BUS SERVICE DIRECTLY
TIES THE NOERENBERG SITE TO DOWNTOWN MINNEAPOLIS. THE BUS FARE FROM
DOWNTOWN MINNEAPOLIS TO THE NOERENBERG SITE IS CURRENTLY FIFTY CENTS
(.'_ONE 1 TO ZONE 3).
WITH THIS RELATIONSHIP TO THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM, THE SITE IS REASONABLY
ACCESSIBLE TO ALL SEGMENTS OF THE VETROPOLITAN AREA POPULATION.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS
TO UNDERSTAI•I) THE SITE AND THE SPECIFIC ELEMENTS OF THE CONCEPT, AN INVEN-
TORY AND ANALYSIS OF THE SITE WAS COMPLETED. SITE STUDIES INCLUDED THE
FOLLOWING AND CORRESPONDING TO THE ATTACHED MAPS AND/OR PLATES:
1.
2.
EXISTING CULTURAL FEATURES
EXISTING DEVELOPED FEATURES WITHIN
UTILITIES, ETC. WERE IDENTIFIED.
OF COUNTY ROAD 5i ARE ELECTRICAL,
TOPOGRAPHY
THE SITE SUCH AS ROADS, BUILDINGS,
UTILITIES WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY
TELEPHONE AND SANITARY SEWER.
DEGREES OF SLOPE GRADIENT FROM 0% - 5%, 5% - 10% AND SLOPE.) GREATER
THAN 10% WERE IDENTIFIED, BASED ON A CONTOUR INTERVAL OF TWO FEET.
SLOPES OF 0% - 5% ARE CONSIDERED TU HAVE SLIGHT LIMITATIONS FOR DEVELOP-
MENT OF STRUCTURES AND OTC'ER PUBLIC USE FACILITIES; 5% - 10% HAVE
MODERATE LIMITATIONS; AND SLOPES GREATER THAN 10% ARE CONSIDERED TO
HAVE HIGH EROSION POTENTIAL AND ARE CONSIDERED AS UNDEVELOPABLE. THE
MOST PRONOUNCED TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES ON THE SITE ARE THE HILL IN THE
CENTRAL PART OF THE GARDEN, THE HILL OVERLOOKING THE LAKE IN THE EAST
PART OF THE GARDEN, AND THE PENNINSULA EXTENDING INTO THE LAKE IN THE
SANCTUARY.
3. SOILS
VARIOUS SOILS WITHIN THE SITE WERE IDENTIFIED AND CLASSIFIED ACCORDING
TO THEIR RELATIVE SUITABILITY FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SUPPORT FACILITIES
SUCH AS ROADS, PARKING A14D BUILDINGS.
4. EXISTINC VEGETATION PATTEWIS
OVERSTORY VEGETATION WITHIN THE SITE WAS CATALOGED. TWO HUNDRED AND
TWENTY DECIDUOUS TREES OF 17 SPECIES, AND 14; CONIFEROUS TREES OF 9
SPECIES WERE LOCATED WITHIN THE 16 ACRE GARDE14 SITE. THE MO5'1 ABUNDANT
DECIDUOUS TREE IS AMEAICAN ELM (52), AND CONIFER IS SCOTCH PINE (48).
ELM REPRESENTS ONLY 2410 OF THE DECIDUOUS TREES AND 14% OVERALL. THIS
MENJS THAT THE GARDEN'S EXISTING CHARACTER CAN BE MAINTAINED AND WILL
NOT BE DESTROYED AS TREES ARE LOST TO DUTCH ELM DISEASE.
5.
7.
SUN A14D SHADE PATTERNS
THE RELATIVE DURATION OF SUN AND SHADE PATTERNS WITHIN THE SITE WERE
STUDIED BASED UPON A NINE HOUR INTERVAL BETWEEN 9 A.M. AND 6 P.M. OtJ
THE LONGEST DAY OF THE YEAR ( 21 JUNE ). BECAUSE THE SUCCESS OF
FLOWERING PLANTS IS DEPENDENT UPON SUNSHINE, THIS STUDY HELPS TO
IDENTIFY AREAS THAT ARE CONDUCIVE TO VARIOUS GARDEN TYPES AND FEATURES.
NATURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY - SOILS
THIS IDENTIFIES AND INTERPRETS SOIL TEXTURE, AVAILABLE MOISTURE CAPACITY,
INTERNAL DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY. THIS DATA IS THEN UTILIZED IN
DETERMINING THE CAPABILITY OF SOILS FOR SUPPORTING VARIOUS TYPES OF
VEGETATION.
NATURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY - EXISTING PLANT COMITIES
THE VARIOUS PLANT COMMUNITIES OR ASSOCIATIONS WHICH EXISTED WITHIN THE
SITE AS OF THE SUMMER OF 1976 WERE MAPPED. THIS INVENTORY PERTAINS
TO THE SANCTUARY PART OF THE SITE. A TOTAL OF 21 INDIVIDUAL PLANT
COMPIUNITY AS :ATIONS HAVE BEEN CLASSIFIED FOR ALL PAP►; FESERVE DISTRICT
LANDS. THESE INDIVIDUAL PLANT CaV"ITIES HAVE BE:'' GROUPED INTO EIGHT
PLANT COM 14ITY CATEGORIES: MES!C FOREST, MIXED UPLAND FOREST, LOWLAND
FOREST, SAVANNA, UPLAND GRASSLAND, HERBA-FOUS WETLANDS, OPEN WATER 410
EXOTIC. AT THE NOERENBERG SITE, 13 OF THE 21 INDIVIDUAL PLANT COMMUN-
ITIES I-AVE BEEN IDENTIFIED TO EXIST REPRESENTING ALL 8 CATFGOF'ES.
SUCH DIVERSITY OF PLANT COMMUNITY TYPES IS UNUSUAL CONSIDERING THE
RELATIVE SIZE OF THE SITE, AND OFFERS AN EXCELLE14T OPPORTUNITY FOR
tlo-kNAGEMENT AS A SANCTUARY WITH A WIDE RANGE OF HABITAT TYPES.
8. SPATiAL ANALYSIS
THVSTUDY IDENTIFIES
WITHIN THE SITE, AND
IN" ERRELATED.
9. CCNC''PT PLAN
THE GENERAL SPATIAL AND VISUAL DUALITY OCCURRING
HELPS TO EXPLAIN HOW THESE VISUAL FEATURES ARE
OVERALL SITE COtJCEPT: THE TWO PARTS OF THE SITE WILL OPERATE AS ONE
:�-TICTZONAL PARK alIT. ALTHOUGH THE NORTH PART OF THE SITE WILL BE A
SANCTUARY, AND THE SOUTH PMT A DISPLAY GARDEN, THE USER PUBLIC WILL
CONSIDER. THE TWO AS CLOSEL FAELAMM PARTS OF A SINGLE PARK. THE
BI:-'--TIOtl OF THE SITE BY COLtM ROAD 51 ADDS TO THE APPARENT SEPARATION
I I,10 T1.10 PARK UNITS, AND IT IS ALONG THIS ROAD THAT THE GREATEST EMPH'AS I S
ON TIE INTEGRATION OF THE TWO PARTS NEEDS TO OCCUR.
ENTRY TO THE ENTIRE PART; WILL OCCUR AT THE EAST SIDE OF THE 51TF. THIS
ARRANGEhENT WILL PHYSICALLY AtJD VISUALL`' :NTEGRATE THE ACCESS AND PARKING
FOR THE SANCTUARY AND GARDFN. GARDEN RELATED BACKGROUND PLANTINGS OF
TREES A141) SHRUF6S WILL CONTINUE ACROSS THE ROAD ARCUJD THE ENTRY -PARKING
AREA OF THE SANCTUARY. THIS CONTINUITY OF PLANTING AT THE ENTRY WILL
GIVE A STROrJGER IMPRESSION TO THE USER THAT TFIE SANCTUARY AND GARDEN ARE
IN FACT PARTS OF THE SAME GARDEN RELATED PARK.
A
"lY lTt:
AS COUNTY ROAD 51 CONTINUES THROUGH THE kEllAINVER OF THE SITE, THE
SANCTUARY RELATED PLANTINGS OF TREES SHRUBS, ETC. WILL BE UTILIZED ON
THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE ROAD AS A BACKDROP AND BUFFER TC THE GARDEN.
THIS WILL FURTHER STRENGTHEN THE CONTINUITY OF THE TOTAL SITE ACID PLACE
A GREATER EMPHASIS AND
PLANTINGS. IMPORTANCE TO THE ENTRY WITH THE GARDEN RELATED
SANCTUARY CONCEPT
'" THE SANCTUARY WILL BE MAINTAINED IN ITS APPROXIMATE NATURAL STATE AS A
WILDLIFE —OBSERVATION AREA. PEDESTRIAN TRAILS, DECKS, BLINDS
ETC. WILL BE PROVIDED TO ALLOW PUBLIC VIEWING OPPORTUNITIES. THESEWALKS,
FEATURES WILL BE LOCATED TO Eh1PHASIZE THE DIVERSITY OF PLANT COMMUNITIES
AND HABITATS THAT EXIST WITHIN THE SITE. ENHANCEMENT OF THE VISUAL
CHARACTER OF THE SANCTUARY WILL BE ACHIEVED BY PLANTING SHRUBS AND
WILDFLOWERS ^.LCING THE TRAIL NETIVORK. THIS WILL COMPLEMENT THE DISPLAY
FEATURES OF THE GARDEN TO ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO UTILIZE THE TOTAL SITE.
GARDEN CONCEPT
THE GARDEN WILL BE DEVELOPED FOR GENERAL DISPLAY PURPOSES WITH A VARIETY
OF PLANTINGS AND DISPLAY FEATURES. TO ACHIEVE VARIETY, A CENTRAL GARDEN
AREA WILL SET IN A MATRIX OF GARDEN RELATED TREES AND SHRUBS. A PATHWAY
SYSTEM CONTAINING SMALLER GARDEN NODES WILL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE TREE —
SHRUB MATRIX. THIS CONCEPT PROVIDES ONE GARDEN NESTLED WITHIN ANOTHER.
THE CAPABILITIES OF THE SITE ARE THEREBY EXPANDED TO PROVIDE DIFFERENT
GARDEN EXPERIENCES.
THE CENTRAL ;AkDEN AREA WILL BE INTENSIVELY DEVELOPED WITH FLORAL DISPLAYS.
PREDOMINA;vt PLANT MATERIALS WILL BE ANNUALS PEkENNIALS, BULBS AND GROUNC)
COVERS. IN THIS AREA THERE WILL BE EMPHASIS' ON
GARDEN
SUCH AS ARBORS, WATER, WALLS, TERRACES, DECKS, SCULPTURE, ETC. S ECIFIC
FEATURES WITHIN THE CENTRAL GARDEN AREA ARE AS FOLLOWS:
i. VISITOR FACILITY BUILDING
THIS BUILDING WILL BE LOCATED AT THE ENTRY TO THE GARDEN AND WILL BE
DISCUSSED IN GREATER DETAIL UNDER SUPPORT FACILITIES.
2. PRIMARY FLORAL DISPLAY AREA
THIS AREA WILL CONTAIN THE GREATEST CONCENTRATION OF FLORAL DISPLAYS
AND IS 1N THE SAME LOCATION AS THE EXISTING FLOWER GARDEN. 1T WILL
C014SIST OF THREE SECTIONS, EACH HAVING A DIFFERENT DISPLAY CHARACTER,
SURROUtdDING A CENTRAL TURF GRASS AREA.
3. GRAPE ARBOR
AN EXISTING GRAPE ARBOR WILL BE RENOVATED AND UTILIZED IN THE GARDEN.
4. %f,"IALL ARBOR
ON THE SITE OF THE FGP,t'ER RESIDENCE WILL BE A MEMOR 1 AL ARBOR WITH A
TERRACE SURROUNDItC IT. THIS ARBOR IS RFQUIRED TO VFET ONL OF THE
PROVISIONS OF THE WILL.
5. TERRACE OVERLOOK
THIS FEATURE WILL BE LOCATED ON THE FOUNDATION LEVEL OF AN EXISTING
GARAGE. THE GARAGE WILL BE REMOVED AND A TERRACE SURFACE C014STRUCTED
ON THE FOUNDATION. THIS LEVEL IS APPROXIMATELY 15 FEET ABOVE THE
AREA NORTH OF IT WHICH WILL BE DEVELOPED AS A GARDEN TO BE VIEWED
FROM ABOVE.
6. LAKE OVERLOOK DECK
AN OVERLOOK DECK WILL BE DEVELOPED BETWEEN THE MEMORIAL ARBOR AND
THE LAKE TO PROVIDE A BETTER VIEW OF THE LAKE AND THE EXISTING GAZEBO.
7. GAZEBO
THIS IS AN EXISTING BUT SOMEWHAT DETERIORATED FEATURE ON THE SHORE OF
CRYSTAL BAY. IT HAS BECOME A LAKE ORIENTED LANDMARK AND WILL BE
RESTORED AS AN IMPORTANT FEATURE OF THE GARDEN.
?. WATER FEATURE
THIS FEATURE WILL START AT THE MEMCjRiAL ARBOR TERRACE AND FLOW DOWN
BOTH SIDES OF THE HILL FOR A TOTAL LENGTH OF APPROXIMATELY 450 FEET.
IT WILL CONSIST OF A SERIES OF POOLS, CHANNELS AND SMALL WATERFALLS
WITH A DECK DEVELOPED PARTLY OVER THE POOL ON ITS WEST END.
THE PATHWAY —PERIPHERAL GARDEN NODES WILL ENCIRCLE THE CENTRAL GARDEN AREA
PROVIDE DIFFERENT TYPES OF EXPERIENCES. THE GARDEN NODES WILL NOT
BE SCALED DOWN DUPLICATIONS OF THE CENTRAL GARDEN AREA, BUT WILL FEATURE
DIFFERENT EMPHASES WITH WOODY PLANTS HAVING AN EQUAL OR GREATER ROLE
T�-tN HERBACEOUS PLANTS IN THE DISPLAYS. THE TYPES OF GARDEN NODES WILL EE:
1. AZALEA GARDEN
THIS WILL BE LOCATED WITHIN AN EXISTING GROVE OF PINE TREES WHICH
PROVIDES THE SPECIFIC SITE REQUIREMENTS FOR THESE PLANTS.
2. SHADE GARDENS
THIS NODE WILL CONSIST Of, TWQ AREAS RECEIVING MODERATE TO HEAVY SHADE I '— I
FOR D I SPLAY OF PLANTS WMBC 1' CAN TOLERATE AND THRIVE IN SHADY COND I T I ChNS . 'H i f-4 C IN
VISUAL GARDEN
THE AREA NORTH OF THE EXISTING GARAGE WILL BE DEVELOPED TO BE VIEWED
FROM THE TERRACE ON THE GARAGE FOUNDATION ABOVE.
4. wT I VE GRN*ENTAL GARDEf IS
TWO AREAS WILL BE DEVELOPED WITH DATIVE: OPJVVENTAL PLANTS, PREDOMINANTLY
FLCWERIt;G SHRUBS.
5. MEDICINAL AND EDIBLE DISPLAY GARDEN
A"a AREA AT THE WEST END OF THE SITE WILL BE DEVELOPED WITH PLANT VARIETIES
HISTOP!CALLY USED FCR MEDICINAL OR EDIBLE PURPOSES. IT WILL ALSO CONTAIN
';AT 1 `�l N4[)/OR WILD PLANTS RATHER TWdtj DOMESTICATED CULTIVATED PLANTS.
6. SPRING BULB DISPLAYS
TWO AREAS ALONG THE LAKESHORE WILL BE DEVELOPED AS SPRING BULB
DISPLAYS. THE SOUTH FACING SLOPES SHOULD CAUSE EARLIER FLOWERING
AND EXTE1l) THE SEASON OF BLOOM.
7. TERRACED GARDEN
THIS NODE WILL BE IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE VISITOR FACILITY
BUILDING. IT WILL BE A MULTI -LEVEL GARDE14 STEPPING DOWN TO THE
LAKESHORE.
8 , MEADOW
THE OPEN FLAT AREA ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE SITE WILL BE DEVELOPED
AS A DISPLAY MEADOW, WITH A PATHWAY CIRCLING THE EDGE AND OVERLOOKING
THE MEADOW. THIS WILL ADD ANOTHER DIMENSION AND EXPERIENCE LEVEL TO
THE GARDEN. IN ALL OTHER DISPLAYS OF THE GARDEN THE SCALE OF VIEWING
IS CLOSE AND INTIMATE, BUT IN THE MEADOW THE SCALE OF VIEWING WILL
BE OPEN AND MORE EXPANSIVE.
SUPPORT FACILITIES
CERTAIN SUPPORT FACILITIES ARE A NECESSITY FOR THE EFFECTIVE USE "NO
MANAGEMENT OF THE GARDEN AND SANCTUARY. THE ENTRY AND PARKING WILL BE
LOCATED ON THE EAST PART OF THE SITE. A PARKING LOT FCR 65 CARS WILL
BE PROVIDED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CO. RD. 51 AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE
GARDEN. A DROP-OFF AND TURN -AROUND TO ACCOMMODATE BUSES WILL BE INCLUDED.
BUS PARKING WILL BE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CO. RD. 51. A SEPARATE DROP-OFF
AND RAtIP TO THE VISITOR FACILITY WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THE HANDICAPPED.
PARKING FOR 126 CARS WILL BE PROVIDED NORTH OF CO. RD. ;1. THIS WILL
PROVIDE DIRECT ACCESS TO THE SANCTUARY AND ADDITIONAL PARKING FOR THE
GARDEN.
THE DEVELOPMENT OF A VISITOR FACILITY BUILDING IS ESSENTIAL TO THE
ENJOYt".ENT AND COMFORT OF THE USER PUBLIC. THE STRUCTURE WILL BE LOCATED
AT THE ENTRY TO THE GARDEN TO SERVE AS THE INITIAL CONTACT POINT FOR ALL
VISITORS. IT WILL BE A YEAR ROUND FACILITY FOP, THE FOLLOWING:
1. VISITOR CONTACT SUCH AS DISPERSAL OF INFORMATION ABOUT THE GARDEN,
DISPLAYS AND STAFF CONTACT.
2. VISITOR COMFORT ltlCLUDING RESTROOMS, DRINKING FOUNTAINS, TELEPHONE
AND LOUNGE.
3. DEMONSTRATION -EDUCATION OPPORTUNITIES WITH AN AREA FOR DEMONSTRATION
OF METHODS AND PRACTICES USED IN THE OPERATION OF THE GARDEN AMU
CLASSROOM SPACE TO CONDUCT CLASSES IN GARDENING AND RELATED SUBJECTS.
TO EFFCCTIVELY OPERATE ANO MAINTAIN THE GARDEN, A SERVICE FACILITY WILL
HE LOCATED NORTH OF COUNTY 5L NEAR THE ENTRANCE TO THE GARDEN AND WILL CONTAIN
SPACE FOR THE FOLLOWING:
1. ADMINISTRATION, INCLUDING AN OFFICE, RESTROOMS, EMPLOYEE WORKSPACE
AND LUNCHROOM.
2. MAINTENANCE, INCLUDING VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT, STORAGE AND WORKSPACE.
3. PROPAGATION, INCLUDING GREENHOUSE, HEADHOUSE, LATHHOUSE, OUTDOOR
CONTAINER PLANT AREA AND AN OUTDOOR PLANT PROPAGATION AREA.
4. SPECIAL WORKSPACE FOR SAFE HANDLING AND DISPOSAL OF PESTICIDES.
ACCESS TO SPECIAL POPULATION GROUPS
WITH EXISTING BUS SERVICE TO THE SITE FROM DOWNTOWN MINNEAPOLIS, THIS
SITE WILL BE READILY AVAILABLE TO ALL POPULATION GROUPS. PROPOSED
DEVELOPMEIJT IS DESIGNED TO ACCOtf90DATE THE NEEDS OF SPECIAL POPULATION
GROUPS (ESPECIALLY HANDICAPPED). ALL PATHWAYS WILL BE SURFACED TO
ACCOMMDDATE WHEELCHAIRS. GRADES OF THE PATHWAYS WILL BE SUCH THAT
WHEELCHAIRS WILL HAVE ACCESS TO ABOUT 90% OF THE GARDEN. IN GENERA,
A.NY FACILITIES NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE THE HANDICAPPED OR OTHER SPECIAL
PO'ULATI(*l GROUPS WILL BE INTEGRATED INTO THE OVERALL DESIGN, RATHER
THAt4 PROVIDING SPECIAL FACILITIES FOR SPECIAL GROUPS. AN EXAMPLE OF THIS
IS WHERE RAMPS ARE REQUIRED TO ALLOW tAlEELCHAIR ACCESS. THESE WILL BE
TIED INTO THE OVERA-•L CIRCULATION SYSTEM AND MADE ATTRACTIVE FOR ALL USERS.
MULTI -SEASON USE
PUBLIC USE OF A DISPLAY GARDEN IN THE MINNESOTA CLIMATE I5 SOMEWHAT LIMITED
TO THE WARM MONTHS OF THE YEAR. BECAUSE OF THIS, A STRONG EFFORT WILL BE MADE
TO EXT-ND THE USEAGE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE YEAR. THIS WILL BE DONE THROUGH
THE FOLLOWING EFFORTS:
1. USE OF PLANT MATERIALS WHICH HAVE ATTRACTIVE WINTER CHARACTERISTICS
SUCH AS COLORED BARK AND FRUITS.
2. USE OF THE GARDEN IN THE WINTER AS A BIRD WAICH1NG APFA. THIS CAN
BE ACCCIIPLISHED BY THE USE OF PLANT MATERIALS t-TRAC;iVE TO BIRDS
AS WELL AS SUPPLEMENTARY FEEDING.
AS
I NTERPRET I \%E-EDUCATIONAL USE TFIROUG; LOUT 1 E YEAR. BY OFFERING
CLASSES AND INTERPRETIVE PROGRAMS, THE VISITOR FACILITY WILL
EXTF"' THE USER SEASON TO THE ENTIRE YEAR. CLASSES AND PROGRAMS
IN GARDENIr1G, BIRD IDENTIFICATION .4ID FEEDING ARE EXAMPLES OF
WINTERTIIME USE. THE SANCTUARY GRMIDS WILL BE USED AS AN INTERPRETIVE
AREA THROUGHOUT THE YEAR.
USER CAPACITY
ACCURATE ESTIMATION OF USE OF A PROPCSED FACILITY OF THIS TYPE WOULD BE
VERY DIFFICULT TO DETERMINE. A THEOFETIU1 DESIGN :APACITY CAN BE
ESTIMATED BASED UPON THE SIZE OF THE FACILITY ANT) AN ASSUMED DENSITY OF
USE:
10
THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF THE GARDEN INCLUDES APPROXIMATELY 1.3 MILES
OF PATMVAY. AN ASSUMED DENSITY OF USE OF AN AVERAGE OF ONE PERSON
EVERY TEN FEET THROUGHOUT THE PATHWAY SYSTEM GIVES A CAPACITY OF APPROX-
IMATELY 700 USERS AT ONE TIME. AN EXPECTED TURNOVER RATE OF THREE PER
DAY GIVES A DAILY CAPACITY OF 2,100 USERS.
MCPRD/P&E
1977
", , ff4m
loo
LAKE MINNETONKA— CRYSTAL SAY
@me amp mmw" - Dspl. of PWilk
. SW IP 0 ....
— Contow inwvol -own #"§
—TM ymy backvqw" go" MdKasm the
eme ewskie "w pwk bwmwwv
NOERENBERG MEMORIAL
COUNTY PARK
existins culowral foistwirows
COUNTY
PARK
RISERVI
DISTRICT
PLANNING A
11"Giftilial"a
DIPART8611011
►En~RAL GARDEN NOW
ram_^ L'."r+�jj' i _~�' ... ••••�� - `� , - •� ,To-
Zj
o r.}
'* XX
LAKE MINNETONKA-CRYSTAL BAY
Vra PAT~Y SYSTEM
goGARDEN RELATED TREES -SF
SANCTUARY RELATED TREES]
ENTRY ROAD
PAAKING
- Bo.• map wm<• - D.p, of ryPublkl
Work. - Suy 0......
- C-1 Vr Inl•r ral - Ira {..t
-Th. yray b.,69r... d I...t ..dtj
ar.o uut..d. th. Palk tuu .ndary
NOERENSERG M E M C
COUNTY PART
tOAENof diwom
NENNf►IN
COUNTY
PARK
f[SI Rv[
o1STRICT
m
PLANNING •
ENGINEERSNo
DIPArt RSENY
4-..-,-rA, `� • `I` ``�,"° ° ° ° ° v" I ° -'°' Ate- H
-
ve
!r e
-------------
Np
`—s--- —_ BLARE
E.0"
HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK. RESERVE DISTRICT ANDN/NG
NGINEERiNG
DEPARTMENT
circulation diagram AlM1977 ZI
e so loo+l
NOERENBERG MEMORIAL COUNTY PARK
PRIMOMY
DISPLAY
VL •
i
HE
GARDEN & SANC
NOERENBERG N
COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1984 PAGE 1
mov 2 G 1984
ATTENDANCE 7 :00 PM The Orono Counci I met on the above date . The following
Councilmembers were present: Mayor Bu ouncil-
members Adams and Hammerelc T)(uoFl���ahm and
Grabek were absent. City Administrator Benson was
absent. City Attorney Radio, City Engineer Cook,
Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson, Assistant Zoning
Administrator Gaffron, Finance Director Kuehn, Police
Chief Kilbo, and Recorder Sutton represented the City
staff.
CRYSTAL BAY SEWER PROJECT
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC
HEARING 7 : 00 - 9 : 14 PM Mayor But ler announced the cont inuat ion of the Crystal Bay
public hearing. Butler noted f or the record a petition
that was received from the neighbors. The followir.g
neighbors were present for the continuation c.f tt.e
Crystal Bay public hearing:
John Story of 1233 Briar Street
Charlie Dobson of 1290 Arbor Street
John & Patti Worre of 1270 Arbor Street
Duane Gle:v of 1135 Brown Road South
Richard & Ardella Johnson of 1241 Brown Road South
Randolph & Peggy Lukanen of 1085 Brown Road South
Karen Bjerkeng of 1245 Arbor Street
Fred & Margaret Curtis of 2180 Prospect Avenue
Hilda & Ulai Hanson of 1290 Railroad Avenue
Frank & Barbara Peterson of 1261 Arbor Street.
Wayne Quast of 1205 Brown Road South
Alex & Diann Jentilucci of 1295 Briar Street
Steve Carlson of 12G5 Arbor Street
Rick, Jan, & Bob Johnson of 2170 Prospect Avenue
Norma Schnoon of 1220 Lakeview Avenue
Phyllis & Lawrence fymoniak of 1155 Brown Road So.
Mary & Jack Spence of 2040 North Shore Drive
Mary & Dan Crear of )980 Spates Avenue
George & Susan Rovegno of 2010 Shoreline Drive
Curtis & Katherine Quady of 1223 Brown Road So.
LaDean McWilliams of 1130 Willow Drive South
Marvel and C.N. Sandgren of 1215 Arbor Street
Bob & Barb Braun of 1230 Arbor Street
Karin Zeeb of 1245 Lakeview Avenue
Judy Christenson of 1251 Brown Road So.
Maybell Kohl of 1224 Briar Street
Mindy Pattee of 1355 Arbor Street
Rick Kieman of 1212 Briar Street
Oliver Engstrom of 1145 Willow Drive
Linda & Gary Printup of 1261 Briar Street
David Liesen of 1140 Willow Drive
Kevin Derry of 1115 Brown Road
Dianne Mattila of 1270 Briar Street
Patricia Drummond of 2160 Prospect Avenue
Mr. and Mrs. Herb Shepherd of 1335 Briar Street
Gail Stowe of 1250 Briar Street
MINUTES 0'' THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1984 PAGE 2
CRYSTAL BAY SEWER PROJECT
City Engineer Cook reviewed with the public the
proposed sewer line and lift station locations in the
Crystal Bay area.
One man suggested that the City assume the LDSt of
maintenance of the lift station thereby reducing the
cost of the whole sewer project.
City Engineer Cook stated that it costs the City
approximately $4, 500 a year for the maintenance of each
lift station.
George Rovegno of 2010 Shoreline Drive suggested that
the when installing the sewer pipe, that the
contractors to be careful no' Lo tear up the road which
would rcdu,.;e the cost of the project.
City Engineer Cook stated that it is impossible to
install piping without tearing up the roads. Cook
stated that the City can just restore the roads to their
original state now rather than extending the roads.
Cook stated that this would cut the cost of the project.
C-^k noted that the City could save money if they didn't
nave to pay for easements on private property. Cook
explained that it could cost approximately $10,000 per
unit if the City could cut the cost on the roads,
easements, and have cooperation f rom the neighborhood.
One lady suggested putting in water at the same time as
the sewer.
City Engineer Cook responded that only sewer is planned
for the Crystal Bay area. Cook reminded the neighbors
that e.o put in water at the same time would Increase the
cost of the project.
Alex Jentilucci of 1295 Briar Street suggested putting
in the rater pipe, dry piping, in case it would be used in
the future.
City Engineer Cook noted that when a dry pipe sits for
one winter, the joints begin to compress.
Gary Printup of 1261 Briar Street asked what would be
the cost if the City didn't replace the roads with 3" of
asphalt and just used 2" and aiau just paved the
existing size �;i tr.e streets now.
(.ity Engineer Cook explained to reduce the proposed
reads from 24' to 18' it would reduce the cost of the
pr-)ject approximately $100,030. Cook stated another
$50,000 could be reduced .if the City were to use 2" of
asphalt. Cook informed the neighborhood that it would
be approximately $2,000 less per unit for reducing the
street replacement proposal. Cook noted that another
area the City could reduce the sewer project cost by
$40,000 is to seed grass areas that will be torn up
rather than using sod. Cook stated that the neighbors
could also take care of their own yards: and traduce., the
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1984 PAGE 3
CRYSTAL BAY SEWER PROJECT
Mayor Butler received a letter f rom the residents of the
Crystal Bay area noting their ideas for reducing the
proposed sewer project. Such letter is attached to
these minutes on page 13.
George Rovegno of 2010 Shoreline Dri a who bears
the debt of the deferred assessme
Mayor Butler replied the general tax p..rer.
One lady stated that according to the appraisals that
were done, there are still going to be a lot of people
coming below that appraised valuation. She stated
that in order for- the City to avoid lawsuits, the City is
going to have to pick up part of the unit cost. She
stated that the option to assess the project 50-50, ib
still going to l,e too much for each individual to pay.
She asked the Council to consider 30-70 option.
George Rovegno of 2010 Shoreline Drive presented a
letter in which he had commented on the appraisals that
were done on some of the properties in the Crystal Bay
area. Such letter is attached to these minutes on page
14.
Randolph Lukanen of 1085 Brown Road South stated that
when he bought his lot he called City Hall to see if there
was any potential sewer proposed for this area.
Lukanen stated that he was told that he would most
?ikely not be included in any potential sewer project.
One lady stated that they just put in a new septic system
under the direction that sewer would not be put in for
sometime.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that
when people have called City Hall for information
regarding sewers in the Crystal Bay area, they have been
told consistently that there was no set timetable for
sewer installation and that there was no immediate plan
to install sewer in this area, but it would definitely
be sewered it federal grant monies became available.
Gaffron stated that the situation has now changed, no
funding appears to be available, and there are problems
row which the neighbors who attended the previous
.neetings felt warranted proceeding with the process to
determine the actual cost of sewering the area.
Alex Jentilucci of 1295 Briar Street stated that the
majority of the people want the sewer, but not the high
assessments that the City is thinking of imposing.
Jentilucci stated that when they moved in it was their
distinct understanding that sewer would be installed
approximately 5 years from the a-+ —ley moved in.
Jentilucci stated it has been L ,cars and the City is
still talking about potential sewer, but has taken no
action. Jentilucci stated that the Crystal Say area
needs sewer.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER f3, 1984 P:1GE 4
CRYSTAL BAD( SEWER PROJECT
One lady wanted to clarify the petition t'.at was signed
by many Crystal Bay residents. She noted that the
petition was not any indication that the residents
don't want sewer, but that the neighborhood was opposed
to the method of assessment that the City is considering
(Example 50-50 option).
One man noted that there arc. many people who are
included in the sewer project that don't want sewer
because they don't have problems with their existing
septic systems.
Mayor Butler rem:.rked that at the last meeting, one of
the Councilmembers asked staff to investigate how much
the general tax payer would have to pay if a portion of
the project was spread across the general tax rolls.
Butler used an example of an Orono resident who had a
household income of $25,000 and if the property was
worth $75,000, the addition to that individuals tax
bi 11 would be $29. 50 per year over the 1 i fe of the bonds
(15 years). Butler used another example of an Orono
resident who had a net tax per year of $50,000 and lived
.Ln a $200, 000 home; his tax increase f or picking up half
the bill for this sewer project would be $41.19 a year.
Butler noted these examples would be if the City was to
choose the 50-50 assessed option for the project.
Butler stated if the City was to pick up 70 percent of the
project, that same person at $25,000 a year living in a
$75,000 home would have an increase of $35.40 per year
over 15 years. Butler reminded the audience if any
portiun :)f the project is uut cn the general tax rolls,
that trey are also on the general tax rolls and would
also receive that increase in their basic real estate
tax.
George Rovegno of 20iO Shoreline Drive stated that
nothing says the City can't. just pay for a portion of
this project out of the general budget and not assess
the general tax payer. Rovegno stated that way it
would just mean that the City has to be more
conservative in the rest of its operations.
John Ericson if 1620 Shadywood Road stated that he is in
the sewer and water construction business. Ericson
noted if this should come to the point where the City
asks the general tax payer to pay for a portion of the
project, he personally would have n, problem with an
additional $30 a year. Ericson stated that tic, woula
object if the City doesn't put in a water main along with
the sewer line at the same time. F• -• 3ted that it
would be a waste if* the City Cut now, and five
years f rom now had t o tear up t he . tai.n to put in
watf•r.
MINUTES OF THE RE,,'h.AR ORONO COUNCIL MELTING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1984 PAGE 5
CRYSTAL BAY SEWER PROJECT
Mayor Butler replied that there is no reason to put
water in this area. Butler explained that there is no
water tower, and the City would have to build another
water tower. Butler asked the Public Works
Coordinator if there is any block grant monies
available.
Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson stated that the
City receives $28,000 a year in block grant monies.
Gerhardson stated that the City can use this money for
sewer projects.
George Rovegno of 2010 Shoreline Drive ieviewed with
the Council his letter he submitted at the meeting.
Such letter is attached to page 14 of these minutes.
Rovegno stated that the appraiser used a theory to come
up with the appraisals. Rovegno reviewed his letter
with the Council in which he believed the appraisals
were facetious and fallaciouE
One man stated that the Crystal Bay area _s unique. He
noted that the value of the houses are such that they
aren't going to increase $10, 000 when they get ready to
sell their property.
Councilmember Adams stated that af_er seeing the
appraisals, he would be in favor of the 50-50 assessment
option. Adams noted that the Council should not t=
any action until the other two Councilmembers can ae
present.
Councilmember Hammerel stated that he would be in favor
of the 50-50 assessment option.
Gary Printup of 1261 Briar Street asked the Council to
approve the 70-30 assessment option.
Mayor Butler closed the public hearing at 9:14 p.m.
Butler askspd staff to bring back the following
"84 to informatir>r for the meeting of December 10, 1934 to
continue the Crystal Bay sewer project discussion:
' . The di f f erence i n cost i f the Ci ty used a g.- ` vier
pump.
2. The impact of the cost on the project if the City
doesn't have to pay for easements.
3. Staff to be able to show where those easements are
to be taken from.
4. Staff to bring back f igures as to how much it will
reduce the sewer project cost to reduce the size of
the proposed streets.
MINUTES OF TnE ORONO COUNCIL MEFI.LNG i.ELD NOVEM$ER 13, 1964. 1. ,E f
CONSEAT AGEN:•:* Cou.,,-ilmember Hammerel moved, Councilmember Adams
seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda*, subject to
item number li being removed for discussion, with all
staff reports concerning these items to be attached to
an original copy of these minutes on file in -he City
Clerk's office. Motion, Ayes (?), Nays (0;.
APPROVAL OF MINUT-W& Councilmember Hammerel moved, Councilmember Adams
secondea, to approve the minutes of the regular ;'ouncil
meeting of October 29, 1984. Motion, Ayes i , i , N .ys
(0).
APPROVAL OF MINUTES* Councilmember Hammerel moved, Councilmember Adams
seconded, to approve the minutes of the Canvasr.ing
Board Meeting of November 7, 1984. Motion, Ayes (3) ,
Nays (0).
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION
DISTRICT REPORT There was no report from the Lake W nnetunk-
Conse—a"or District.
PLANNING COMMISSION
COMMENTS Gloria McDonald wa,- not present. Plans,_ ng CommissiDn
member Rovegno was present but had no comments.
PUBLIC COMMENTS There, were no comments trom the f'iblic present.
#611 JOHN ERICSON
1620 SHADYWOOD MOAD
DENIAL OF APPEALS
PETITION REGARDING
?WTZRPRETATLON OF 'SUED
PMULAVIONS
RESOLUTION John Ericson was presern,. Ericson nc tsiat his
attorney has written , letter .-0 the fit) of Orono.
Ericson stated that he didn't receive thr elution
t,r-' ,1 today. Ericsor. -;t.ted that in hi: c the
14,Lq are combined for tax purposes only. r koted
t), *, on !: tie tax statsmEyits thPre is a legal r c, io*
-.,ts, a;pted that he uoesn't consider this
-a bftVtVAriM. Fricson stated th.it il- is consiste.
with the neighborhood and is not a detriment to th.
neighborhood.
City Attorney Rauio stated sine
didr.'t have times to review the r%
Citr hasn't received the attcrt
shouLt table action on the re,
Councilmember
so-conded, to
Ho, -ember 26.
a s (n
Adams m-.� ved .
t00 4-he Lis..
,,4 . .:nunci 1 meet i n
y
the
:ity
...K .i %,Mp.:".: e 1
�. Ca - . on L:nt 1 1.
1.-,, Ik!1, (ii,
E
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL IINETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1984 PAGE 7
#861 STEVEN PAULY
3980 DAHL ROAD
VARIANCE
1869 JAMES PHELAN
1231 WILLHURST TRAIL
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
Steve and Suzie Pauly were present. Assistant Zoning
Administrator Gaffron stated that at the last Council
meeting, Council asked Steven Pauly to reduce the
hardcover on the property by reducing some gravelled
areas and existing shed.
Councilmember Adams stated that he would prefer 'to have
zero percent increase in hardcover.
Mayor Butler suggested trading off hardcover in the 75-
250' setback zone and crediting ; `: s trade off to the 0-
75' setback zone.
Mayor F-01L ter ni-,ved, Councilmember Adams seconded, to
tall- a:.! n on the approving Resolution for Steven
Pauly to allow applicant time to reduce hardcover so
that there is a zero percent increase in hardcover.
Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0).
James Phelan was not present at the time the Council
reviewed his apF'.ication, but he was present at the
leg p .ping of the Council meeting. Recorder St1'.ton
noted that James Phelan had called the office and noted
that he would not be able to attend the meeting.
F;ayor Butler moved, Councilmember Adams seconded, to
grant preliminary approval of a two lot plat
application of James Phelan finding all standards of
the LR-lB zoning district have been satisfied and that
the property has been assessed two sewer units and sewer
is available; such approv-1 is subject to the following
conditions:
1. Future owr ,ot . must apply for , land us, -
permit fro y if a guest home use s proposed
for satruct . erred to as shed on preliminary
plat.
7. Payment of park fee for newly create ',ot 2 at
$100 no.
3. Future owner of Lot 2 must have new access to site
approved by the Public Works Department.
4. Plans for sewer connection to Lot 2 must be reviewed
prior to assurance of a building perwir r ew
residence by the Public Works Department.
ewer unit fee of $225 must be paid wit► ding
•-mi t for Lot 2.
Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0).
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1984 PAGE 8
#871 WILLIAM MIELENZ
3435 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD
VARIANCE
RESOLUTION 11696 William Mielenz was not present.
Mayor Butler noted that when the Planning Ccmmission
reviewed this application, there were some comments
from the neighbors as to the drainage problem
surrounding this property. Butler noted that she
would like this cleared up before building permits are
issued.
Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Adams seconded, to
approve Resolution #1696, A Resolution Approving A
Variance to construct a deck within the 75-250'
lakeshore setback zone. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0).
#872 BRECKENRIDGE DEVELOPMENT CORP
1200 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
RESOLUTION #1697 James Bartlett was present to represent Breckenridge
Development Corporation. Asst Zoning Administrator
Gaffron noted that the Council must first approve a
Resolution to allow hookup to MWCC's sewer lire.
Councilmember Adams moved, Mayor Butler seconded, to
approve Resolution #1697, A Resolution Approving a
Special Exception to Rural Sewage Treatment Policy No.
7 of Orono's Comprehensive Sewer Policy to permit one
sewer connection at1200old Crystal Bay Road. Motion,
Ayes (3), Nays (0).
Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember seconded, to grant
preliminary approval of a two lot plat application of
Breckenridge Development Corporation finding all
standards of the RR-lB Loning district have been
satisfied and that the City approved a sewer connection
to existing metro gravity line based on the f indings in
Resolution #1697; such approval is subject to the
following conditions:
1. Payment of a $225 sewer .:nit charge with building
permit application.
2. Dedication of right-of-way in addition to the
triangle (25' ) t the intersection of County Roads
84 and 51 as shown on plat.
3. Designation and dedication of 20' drainage
easements along east and south property lines--
-ity to acquire Flowage and Conservation easement
over drainage easements.
MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMB:'.R 13, 1984. PAGE 9
#872 BRECKENRIDGE DEVELOPMENT CORP
4. Payment of park fee for newly created lot of
$200.00.
5. Access to new lot must be approved by Hennepin
County Highway Department --access permit must be
submitted with building permit application.
Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0).
i I:7 3 LEO CL1 FFORD
47bg NORTH SHORE DRIVE
VARIANCE
RESOLOTION i1696 Leo and Neila Clifford were present.
Mayor Butler asked if this property had been offered to
the adjacent property owners.
Leo Clifford stated that the property has been for sale
for two years and is currently for sale.
Coun�ilmember Adams stated that the City should
distinguish this .ariance from the other variance they
are revi swing and planning on denying. Adams rioted the
following to distinguish the Cl..fford's application
from other variances:
1. No alternate use for the property.
2. Not a s :f imposed hardship.
3. Adjacent property owners were offered the land for
sale.
Counc:lmember Adams moved, Councilmember Hammerel
seconder:, to approve Resolution #1698, A Resolution
approving a Variance to construct a new home, subject to
changing item #3 in resolution to read "No other
adjacent land is available and there appears to be no
altermtie�'bse of the property" and subject to staff
adding language to include additional right of way to be
acquired in resolution. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0).
ALEX JENTILUCCI
DRAINAGE TILE PROBLEM Alex and Diann Jentilucci of 1295 Briar Street were
present. Jan and Bob Johnson of 2170 Prospect Avenue
and Fred and Margaret Curtis of 2180 Prospect Avenue
were also present.
Mayor But ler noted for the record that the Jentilucci I s
have been added to the agenda as item #10A.
Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson explained that
this is a underground drainage ti le in the Crystal Bay
area which runs .`rom Jentilucci's under the road to
Dayton's property, Gerhardson stated that it is cn
private propert;. Gerhardson noted that the drainage
ditch gets all the drainage from the Crystal Bay area.
MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1984. PAGE 10
Gerhardson stated that i couple of years ago the City
replaced the culvert and created a ponding area for the
drainage. Gerhardson stated that the Jentilucci's
want something done with the tile line.
Alex Jentilucci of 1295 Briar Street showed the Council
pictures of the drainage problem. Jentilucci noted
that the drainage ditch is being used by all of Crystal
Bay, approximately 10 acres. Jentilucci noted that
the City did put in the drainage ditch and the City
should have to maintain the "'itch. Jentilucci stated
that at one time the City was maintaining the ditch and
then quit the maintenance of the ditch after replacing
the culvert a couple of years ago. Jentilucci asked
the City to take care of the problem and clean out ditch
area. Jentilucci noted that all he wants is the street
to disappear from his survey.
Jan Johnson of 2170 Prospect Avenue stated that she used
to call the City to come and clean out ditch area.
Johnson stated that when she stopped calling the City
Stopped maintaining the ditch area.
Margaret Curtis of 2180 Prospect Avenue stated that the
City caused the water flow problem when the City
replaced the culvert. Curtis stated that the City put
in the culvert along time ago and the City should have to
maintain it.
Councilmember Adams explained that Dayton has been told
by the City to maintain his end of the culvert, and the
neighbors here should have to maintain their end.
Adams noted that this is private property.
Diane Jentilucci of 1295 Briar Street stated that the
City should clear up their legal description problem.
Mayor Butler asked there are other people with drainage
problems ir. the City that would want their problems
solved if the City was to maintain this culvert.
Butler also asked the City Attorney to research to see
if the City would be setting an adverse precedent by
taking over the maintenance of this drainage tile.
Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson stated that there
are several other drainage problems in the City.
City Attorney Radio asked that the matter be tabled so
that he may do a review and submit a legal opinion to the
Council. Radio noted that this could be settiny an
adverse precedent if the City was to take over
maintenance of this when it is on private property.
Radio noted that it is not up to the City to clear up
Jentilucci's legal description.
MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEEZING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1984. PAGE 11
Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Adams seconded, to
taule action on this drainage problem until December
10, 1984, to allow the City Attorney to review this and
submit a legal opinion. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0).
SALARY ADJUSTMENT -
SUE BOBZIEN i CAROL
HANSING Police Chief Kilbo was present. Councilmember Adams
explained that he had this item removed from the Consent
Agenda* because he wanted to clarify the policy on
salary adjustments. Adams asked why she just doesn't
get a raise after the first of the year.
Chief Kilbo e.:alained that Sue Bobzien was not given a
raise after her one year of performance which was in
August.
Mayor Butler noted that the raise should go into effect
as of her first year apniversary date in August.
Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Adams seconded, to
approve a salary adjustment for Sue Bobzien effective
August 15, 1984 from $7 . 53 to $7 .83 per hour and Carol
Hansing salary adjustment from $6.00 an hour to $6.24 a
hour effective November 19, 1984. Motion, Ayes (3),
Nays (0).
JULY, 1984 MONTHLY i
YEAR-TO-DATE SUMMARIES
OF RECEIPTS* Councilmember Hammerel moved, Councilmember Adams
seconded, to approve the July, 1984 Monthly and Year -
to -Date Summaries of Receipts, Disbursements and
Balances prepared by Finance Director Kuehn. Motion,
Ayes (3), Nays (0).
AUGUST, 1984 MONTHLY A
YEAR-TO-DATE SUMMARIES
OF RECEIPTS* Councilmember Hamrerrl moved, Councilmember Adams
seconded, to approve the August, 1984 Monthly and Year-
114 to -Date Summaries of Receipts, Disbursements and
j Balances prepared by Finance Director Kuehn. Motion,
Ayes (3), Nays (0).
AUGUST LIQUOR STORE
OPERATING REPORT* Councilmember Hammerel moved, Councilmember Adams
seconded, to approve the monthly August Liquor Store
Operating Report prepared by Finance Director Kuehn.
Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0).
SEPTEMBER LIQUOR STORE
OPERATING REPORT* Councilmember Hammerel moved, Councilmember Adams
seconded, to approve the monthly September Liquor Store
Operating Report prepared by Finance Director Kuehn.
Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0).
MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1984. PAGE 12
CASH i INVESTMENTS
AS OF SEPTEMBER, 1984* Councilmember Hammerel moved, Councilmember Adams
seconded, to approve the cash and investments as of
September 30, 1984, report prepared by Finance Director
Kuehn. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0).
ARBITRATION AWARD
(LELS) LAW ENFORCEMENT
LABOR SERVICES - CONTRACT
APPROVAL* Councilmember Hammerel moved, Councilmember Adams
seconded, to approve the report and contract prepared
by Police Chief Kilbo (LELS) Law Enforcement Labor
Ser-ices. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0).
CARMAN STREET SEWER
PROJECT REIMBURSEMENT* Councilmember Hammerel moved, Councilmember Adams
seconded, to approve the Carman Street Sewer Project
Reimbursement of $3,500 to Richard Edwards of 2480
Carman Street and Edward Lehman of 2470 Carman Street.
Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0).
PUBLIC HEARING
DECE14BER 10, 1984
7:00 PM* Councilmember Hammerel moved, Councilmember Adams
seconded, to approve the public hearing to be scheduled
for December 10, 1984, at 7:00 p.m. concerning the
Transfer Funds of CDBG. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0).
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
COLLECTION OF FEES City Attorney Radio asked that this be discussed in
executive session.
BILLS* Councilmember Hammerel moved, Councilmember Adams
seconded, that the All Funds Accounts and Liquor Store
Accounts be paid. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0).
?4)JOURNMENT 11:19 PM Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Adams seconded, to
adjourn the regular Council meeting at 11:19 p.m. ar.a to
enter into executive session. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays
(0).
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, Deputy Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor
reeel'VM 11-13 -24 &kr)t 1 M 4
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1984 PAGE 13
CITIZ7,1"S ►.•�r s;: CCI C-T?t.:I' , TVE
('RYSTAI n AY S11 TR DR( JECT
As nemb-, rs of the Cr,-etai ?ar Ccm-rarity af'*ected by the proposed
sewer project for 1965, we have outlined five objectives we feel
the City of Crone must achieve before proceedirr with, the project.
Cur petition, against the proposed sewer project,•!nder the three
payment opti;ns,reflects the opinion of �`% out of "3 households.
We believe this is a significant numl er and urge the City of C`ronn
to consider the following objectives
1. :•:idening of the roads and adding cur>,ir;- should
to eliminated
2. Alternative plans for the sewer system tha ma- be
lees expensive should be invssti@at.ed
3• The City of Orcno must resolve to pa•i a portion of
the cost so as not to create an undo hardslip on
the residents of Crystal Ray
4. Including other areas in the pro; ect should tie
considered if this will lower the per unit cDEt
of the project
5. An asrurance from the City that provisions will
be made for those uratle to afford the ars-e-s-ent
As a community, we wish to express to the City Cu-uncil our desire
to cooperate in finding reasonable and oractical sr.lutions that we
as well as the City can accept.
LJ
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL 14EETING HELD NOVE14BER 13, 1984 PAGE 14
2010 Shoreline Drive
Orono, Minnesota
November 13, 1984
Orono City Council
Crystal Bay Minnesota
In the matter of the Public Hearing on Sanitary Sewer in the crystal Bay Area:
Comments in addition to my letter of September 16, 1984.
Issues:
1. Compliance with Community Management Plan
2. Design and Cost
3. Farrell appraisal "Theory"
4. Benefit Analysis
1. Compliance with Community Management Plan (CMP)
The CMP directs that the installation of sanitary sewer shall not
impose hardship on the residents or city. This project may not be
undertaken without satisfying this requirement.
2. Design art Cost
Table 1 - details some of these factors:
Table 1
A. 24 foot wide proposed roads A. 1. No one warts or needs wider
with berm curbs. roads or curbs.
41' 2. Wider roads have inherently
higher installation and
maintenance costs.
3. Increases hard cover
unnecessarily in Lakeshore
district.
B. Total gravity system proposed. B. 1. A limited number of residences
on low ground necessitate extra-
ordinarily deep piping at great
expense.
2. Addition of a limited number of
"grinder" pumps could ree .ne
depth necessary and reduce capi-
tal expenditure.
C. Proposed mains are located within
the paved roadway.
D. Engineering, administrative fees of
25%.
TABLE 1
C. 1. This increases road replacement
costs and pipe installation costs.
2. This is unnecessary in many cases
since the 16 ft wide (average)
roads lie on 40-60 foot wide
rights -of -way.
3. The reasons presented for this
plan is that sewer accesses are
"easier to find in the winter" and
"will not require acquisition of
easements."
D. 1. Other cities, eg. Victoria pay 15%
fees.
E. Exclusion of abutting properties E. 1. Raises per unit costs
served by project mains e.g. Art 2. MUSA line immaterial, ref. Old
Center. Crystal Bay Road.
F. Other issues: 12 dead end pipes F. 1. We need a qualified review to
(Is this excessive?); double piping reduce costs.
in front of Council Chambers (Is
this necessary?); accuracy of cost
estimate (recent h4dding has exceeded
engineering estimates.)
3. Farrell Appraisal "Theory"
While substantial issue may be -.-aken with the absolute numbers provided
and his choice of comparable properties is at the very least seri3usly
flawed, Mr. Farrell has used a "Theory" to arrive at his conclusions
that has no basis in fact, reason, or real estate appraisal practice.
"The value conclusion estimate for the subject systen is based on the�or
that a property with a private system would sell in the lowest rang o -
the estimates. Conversely, a residence with a public sanitary system
and new road ways sell in the higher, enO of the range." (Emphasis
added.)
In practice he concludes that if his three questionable private 3)ystem
comparable properties have "values" of, for example, S50,000, S52,000
and S54,000 an the public system comparable properties have "values" of
S56,000, $58,000, and S60,000; the before and after values ere S50,000
and S60,000. This is fallacious logic, has no basis in fact or practice
and is a self -admitted "theory."
An equally reasonable (or unreasonable) theory would be to conclude;
based on housing demand in Orono both with and without public systems
that the private system property would sell in the highest range because
it is located nEdr to Lake Minnetonka, the School District, and City of
Orono, with its excellent septic system administrati;,n, while the public
property would sell in the lowest part of the range since it really
offers no practical additional benefit. in practice, properties in the
11ns1mv,Pr�d parts of Orono; the Farm at long lake, Green Trees, Webber
Hills, the developments along Old Crystal Bay Road and Willow Drive,
Foxhill and the Pink Palace property to name a few sell at premium
narket prices when contrasted to nearby severed areas in towns such as
_ong Lake.
4. 3enefit Analysis
(or decrease) in property value is
Once a reasonable, rationale increa,c
determined the analysis 4 benefit accruing to the property can begin.
Positive benefits —are:
1. Increase in property value
2. ?
Neaat,/e benefits include:
1. capital costs
2. interest costs (less tax benefits)
3. installition costs
4. S.A.C. Fee, permits
5. loss of val,le in ex' -sting functioning septic system
6. cost of de, Imissioning existing septic
ocs osysem
trees, creation of
7. decrrise in property value, e.g.,
easements.
g, increase in operatinq expense
g, increase in property taxes (IPss iicome tax benefits).
For ^_xamp 10, obtaining an unrealized
g IO, GO beincrease in property value
at a cost of $20,0 s
Table 2 provio,s an illu'�Lration of the principle and does nct purport
to be actual nuilbers.
r/
(ASSET)
Positive Benefit
Increase in value S10,000
Income tax benef•.� (33%)
- interest expense 1,500
- real estate tax 1,300
Total
$12,800
TABLE 2
U ABILITY)
Negative Benefit
(over 15 years)
Assessment S5,000
Interest 4,520
Installation 1,000
SAC fee 425
Loss of value of
functioning
Septic system (50%
depreciated) 2,000
Decommissioning old
system 500
Increased operating
expense (net) 867
Increased property
taxes 4,000
Total S19,312
Net Benefit ;55,512)
(net worth)
Ccnclusions
1. The Crystal Bay Area should receive sanitary sewer.
�. Installation should not impose a hardship on the residents.
3. Design and cost must be carefully evaluated to assure that we obtain a func-
tional system at the lowest reasorAble cos,.
4. Property value conclt.sions should be drawn from real data not
"Theory."
5. Benefit analysis must be total and complete, not piecemeal or selective.
Sincerely,
George r. ?ove,�,o, Jr. Susan J. Rovegno
,7
J
COUNCIL MEETfiJd
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PART A
Nov 2 G 1984
Orono ouncil CITY OF ORONO
Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
November 21, 1984
Roo,' Name Request - #816 Lake MinnPto,:ka Homes
Staf f must recommend against the use of the same root name in the Naming
of the new spur road. The future through road has been approved as
Countryside Drive; ^ountryside Circle is too similar and will cause
conflicts with the locating of homes on countryside Drive. The
cc+- -ns expressed by staff in this review for road name :-equest are the
gab ,s the ones cited in the road name review for the French Creek Plat.
The Police Chief has enclosed sections of the Hudson .directory that
lists o'kPr roads with similar names.
Plea . Connery was advised in Resolution #1641, page 4 -it
Co,..ic.. ipprove road name prior to final plat approval.
(City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 1641
b) Signed and executed"flowage and conservation easement"
over the "drainage easements as shown on the plat of plat
name" -/'� r,
c) Extend original Temporary Road Ma ntenance Agreement to
include 5 new lots
d) Complete enclosed Developer's Agreement to 'Include ail
improvements not completed prior to final [,!at approval �) _, . ���
e) Signed and executed road and utilities easement to cover
the area of the cul de sac not included in dedicated right of
way. A legal description of that area must be created for,,AA- �,F•/
that document I/ -/
f) Complete road name request for private road. Council
must approve road name prior to final plat approval
3. Fees to be paid - Total due C325.00 li- I��t
a) payment for park fee per current schedule
5 lots @ $200.90 = $1,000.00
b) legal review and filing fey• at $75.00
c) final plat application fee at $1o0.00
d) payment for street sign:
1. 1 stop Sig P $ 75.00
2. 1 street sign P, 75.00
� 150.00
Adopted by the City Council May 30,
1984.
. I -
` C' ' `1 :
Mary 1�-r
,Kayor
At est :
i M, n
' oth Ha11in, Debu_tClerk
Or t a . r oni , 2`rt y
4 r 1 4
l?• w CLlM.OP•IN It w
a01OP
1
CI,yi11 aAa ar
IQ-•:
[aa10. -1 t 1d.
T•.-Is%
•a01T•• VISO LA wtr I"-IY
La.wT•♦ l so rw i•1-Iss
)w-1M t4tl/alw: r
aa61r
a! -IA
cvLf.a •r1 N
Iva-". sea--
[ar1.r1(t w l •r
ca0•..■1 w r •r
•ao f,
W fi
co,,Mtaw.tc P 1L
ar-IM
Mo.., RI[MOP•i.L 1
+.•
aalo- lw
1
fILLtOa cod 11
11f-7•
(a•+Ir M•K w to
•»-IHf
CtlrtfwlN P to
aeli-1>•
.l 1.5 ht.Mw..- •D
an +l. +sA
.17-In
MLtw MOM it
NT-,N
1aI+I,t r\K w N
») 70
caWTiwlft f/ to
.li lM
IW CEatlOP•Ia
a.L ft►
f1.-ap
cpN•• .rl aw
-
f1• Ilf
Lfla(tI =- w
flAf-
Poe hl.a =•lar •Mawft
On-
a! -A
CaEtt A fP
>17o•1f1
[1a•ia• .N r
t0f-11f
ma
tart• err• (•
Yt-If0
♦f0 10f ALaavl7r
.0.
n
f10-!
oils: .0.6 atol w
71a-17•
cilY.• •# 1r
ta17' Ill'
[O IIr wl [ .N
M/-Its
Nf CRAW r 1•
w A
N.-11.
CNILAAI fW w tl
•N-M
t1:r•♦ 51 a,•
iY•Y
a!".0. (\tMlrll.
as•-1.1 tiDa[[n t+ »'
70a-ir
at
it•-lI7r
iN-I-Nw.. tfI-•f
IC.It too-,"
r/
crootoE24"t! •ReD +•a•►
]7+ 11
aMf>-1IaYr h1/alO. CI• [a
Ys-Ifl
cle, !♦�
NN
MI-S•
fa
l
cNr
I an
7f1fe'-t.e9`•.
At•OO
9f71-I61
f•
3.0 *4
tiw11Ka
aas-r
040•01
cv .D 1J C
CLMNB
•, a.
IMt-111
CQ.wtlal w N
isf-N
Ca,s .N r In
NI -la a7. '
fw-ISA hf•MI
W-111
G1iwIiK r Lwts af.
10i 10+
ip�y te>71
(a .0 a] •
MI -la! CL[aftf L• at
/• 1T.
no' Ale
CitMfal. to laa.ti PH
Saf to
[m IK .rlT [n
af•w
»TY 7f• '
.�11e ClttllP
aLlM [ a I 10•
t aeft eL N N
cs. M
cm taa[ wl w
.:a
f1' .D [ 1.L
>7, » b1 .
IN-M
/M-Y !••
.•■ •.•
1N eM-IV
ar y
ca O. 1.Y 1wI O
Call" _• OP
tU IW
a1,-,.•
Cm IM 01 a WL
cm taw n 10 a.
!1•-2.
ce a0 ( IS,
•1a a
M•1.1 tLtu<L•••1
R.MIM •q rf
Ts' fr
taw. w. O
i•• ,a
ifs-l.fl• 7S
t0
[
/w-..
"N. AtO .N A
Ale
Inl7►Mt ••t ■ N
r• v
clp+ •M Ir wrf n
CO ■e
Rv •• W y
ba-M
i1•-ta A/ *LaN .tL M.
CAP
a1f-71
t7lf*MD apf . tr
r7 17.
e7�lr. no- see
a[T�-ef
CO N C] .v
CLIra Lay AN a f1'f
COLM • to,
,Ire 7`
LaR..I,S O
L. .S $17 7•
70•-fl. Itl t)
CYl.1w` M : •L
.,f.•1
(aft• a.4 a IP
/0i•Iso
.It-aI
Ca f0 • I.I
to•.•
!-•1 tl� ..•
A/NLa10 au a an
b/'M
CQ tlaYa aIt f iL
t01 173
tpsa cIa fa
Po a0 [ w
sf• 7!
11f ,a1
A[NtJuO f• y µ
iw-t1
Co a*aop M • N
Nl-a1
Cm•fa Cf I If11
fa7-t1t
q W 1 l0
N1 al
•» IN
C►SALri' s• K [►L
!L-ia
t1s (f.l■f aM • N
a1s-71C
gOPtA ♦. w
IM
W-IN
'a01-/al
CO at / w'
aea-w
CL7NLtot a+ w W,
no
I.y10..00 wt f it
aso i,
nsfl IA,r l
W. 11 7.D 9C
7M-Ifi
hto Sc
>rl-/N
as 0•.[00 Lr w
2=1•7
Comm n IM
=-Y
CO tt I W
70.1
1�-IM
.ff-M tt 111 N N
MI•IM
tcE V.01 tr N
N1-0.
COWS, r. a far
AN
tla-too
coa41 Col
Iw-1N
41rt ft fl►
at7-If
I
CI•VYI. '0 w
7/l-1.o
MS MA
itNfl•t0/•
f0 aD t) AM
ili-l.
NF/./
tN•IN hfnsl7/a-•!
GitM.c• [+ a*1
a1}.•
IN W-yf
CO a0 [1 IaR
1.1-aa
(LI rl/r w It
M-tY sr
ifl-Ir
'
CCL lot 1. w.
>rl-lala
as a..
[Y
r-a0
CO tf f N
1 -N
'�-111 [[IIIrIIr t• Lt
7r-f 11
Chl C` If
Nf-IN
COPS t•
W-100
CC a0 r w
Iwy/
olf-Ir tL IrIP A.l A:
)M-N
(
Cll Larl. .•a ��
rl-.
COPSES` M fn
low
C1,66
iaf-11+
r0 s0 I r.
Ift-a.
K IfIP w
1>♦->D
COLUMI..•e r
I"
COLAND
iw-Ir
t0 as • w
IM•A
.if.N CL 1••�. IC Cie
)♦t'M
i
cU.tao 1. w'0 1►,
7N-if
tOPIIY! 1•r
fn
H1 fttc
[O N N N
tt1.11
af7-r.
AIItP ff l+.
ra-as
caL•wI. C, 1.0
•T.,.
[Ifll♦ •M
1" .•a
Lo as n A
It1 to
tIL-,.3
UIaP'- AM r
f/l-AIR
lalaOJ M 2,
lef-11a
CIS" J r
to
atl•tl
a�-1Af
hI■TP IM A�
f/i'!
1
1a lM.la M OPI
y�1
CIAs. II N
faw-ly
CO N w
as . 10
laf i1
1T-!
hIMTP •M ••
TI-Ifl
1
to lrpli W r
laf-Iw
Ctt•Il •' Y
7yIN
M)-la1
W
CO aH r Cal,
it11a
eA_lie
eaf..f.1 h1.11P M t••
i71-IN
to lsLu ar I,I
M. �•
COP•f. 1h: tp .f
fL Ra
.a7-IW
to W 11.
Itt-M
f1a� CL1■101 IL a•.
NI -IN
Lr IR•F.It (w p
"1":31
Gr•.M 1fta
1fa' 11S
:0
cc 1t N
11fi[
fLaa..■ .M a Ir«
iM'1N
CO frL N w
11C` 1]•
Ci••[1•apt A
SN-Ifs
r
t0 i0 1 w
IM-M
llr-IN
OL M■ W1 / I0•
fat-Isa
tq rl■ ..a in
36 -.5
c!K i. a1 w P
Nl i•
tc 00 I aw
Iti-i
alt-!
AIM tl r aw
fw-11s
tow(.L (7 O
als-1IS
tan lta •
a.• 17
CO :0 1 N
/tb11
eTL_ff1
(lur•• a, Iw
AI-Y
tawM1(ti • r
i•1-1'
M• al t r
tL f0
f7t-It•.
Cl lyya• .N
la• 11
A ftf
7.7-1r
CPaI[s w aft
sae«
[f RD
11..-••
t11>•.T• 1. II
•1•-111
twtt (It !
codAt(i
N!• IS
cla, ••11 1 /P
i1'•'I!t
la► Ir
f1•-IlL CLO+a• tla .f
fp-11)
tLfLl \A 1A
11•-)
C0"0. ■at a 1•.+
I. tla 0i
la.-Ifl
7ff-Ir
Rf. a• tO 1 K
seer l to. as►Ir
1.1-y CL Wa■ w w
>♦1-11]
Cw0/ J
Iaf-11.
tleMl.
tared• r a
71T-IO•
N W f C.
i.f-If [L V•Ta w K
t!i•IT
CrMft't LA 1�
CaNit W R•
iN-1•
q
fT-Ia1. Ml'IN
•If-w h.O1tR P M
W
/M-IN
.SS-1S
fi-17L. ili-ly
caaffK. COP I fa It1F 11
[w10+•IP N to
rI-la1
c0 sob 1 V
.fa -I! Ct P.• LA
♦a so
goo- W
CaA2 to • fs
/M 1]
a!1'OP'L tl' O'
Nf-IY
a1tIM-
!a -If/ RLO,A•
4/M. h A
1!-•
twllata COMM • ra
If0.17
aler J A
.T-lat
[O N .D ! No
doe-"
faMf
no, fr
aLOM• LW n10a• !
17f-11•
t[,Aa Ka J ff
lfl•a
ta♦tL.la tl k
y1••
tfi•a/
LO is ! \ 1M
•N'IA
��
Mi-10
aN� at Wov aCM O
ow SO
(awe (a 0a w•
»t-11
M'L= h a••
w fr
..•^al
li •• b i A
ts-r ILN.N■Lt tf1
Loaf:[: a•t f1
N> Ir
rl-lw
alryaa. [1•
fwtL •ar [1• • Sr
Mai
ca N ! L A
a7/1-tff.aWlt/
,ww fey,IN
N
M 7. faf-»
.11 f1
CO" *1IY a.■ rl
Ga,":11. a• c•
1•:•M
ow•,.tl• ' 11 r a.
tot A7
" .• .0
IN
!ta-1Y lL•rawlr •
CLI.tlLLtr LA fef
s)s_r
cti.■■n.a • a.•
M7..1
Ca►r•L. I •N p.
110a
[a.t W f wr•
la'•-0a
N►114 AMa,1 Sal r
ata+t
[oaS.w)r wl w
sea-l1
tar+/rA r na
1100
Sal-I11
7n I.4.4411-210
solo -Am
f!•11f A10 J 0o
1It-IY
tOaOrrO ftn
caoa L• is
COIIaA M .0,
Ift-•0
to as ! l P_
CO N a1 1 1.
„►'�N
P►-wad CL(a N Y
h1I raLLt• N aM
•P'7C1
NF1r
)IO
tMYr/rr era 11.
f. SI• Y
w7 >•
Rw/af[ M a tT•
q •0 .0 S A
At"
Mt•/r
CA. q •
al.-Iao
�wfq•taLN w t•
tie 1E1
b1 IN M. a+
m .a toe w
aN-fi
rt-.:[
CL•f[ N N
siT 11•
COa:alt •• • :aw
•ao 1.7
1talRtt M • fI•
i'al-q
q q •a • IK'
�..it
l.Lec•arle 1! 1
fas- Is,
cum Art fT•
COMM RC lot
t tl -w
al 1 ow -IN
t0
.w
t.'YK •■�' Va f♦
MYI.1
)In
If b. ♦"1
co"Au � M1
N.-(i1
It a: 10 t �
TI•
f;_�. �L
[fK ti00[ N to
tN-I.1
two WA O Rn
af. N
ttRtM Lea !
aaf-N
r N .0
M1 •0 N
R/-r
CAM AN f fn
faf ••
awfM V W
it-/y
M/ 71 Vol -I!
llr,ff.f1:_L!
a!♦wtl [, ea
t10-af
[of) f: N • slI
71. .e
Ctt10O LI M
/t1-0a
at N ! 7 a.
a01.1/1
M.,w
tbtlplow to seal
a•1-IN
COO 1 ar'
ats •.1
(t/laY♦ K 0•
=',=
06"1
'A t0 ao t [:•
W-K
1tf�
•t}lif M100A M 14
IN, 1.,
CfltD h tw
iM.'.
►a! r rf
cant YtttM M of
Iq-•1
aaF Saw
p r 10 • d
q N to • K
l.f .fl
f••-N
IAM IKtt►ta1 CC W
ar l!•
(af�l.a! y w
row It
cm+•atl� M 1
"I An
to N 1! a N
aTt-i7
tif-I� fr aN Y
we-•' a50-w
i
too~ as !
t IP
KF:[•
t/tt IM
Cn l.Wt /0
a✓M 1]'
to N ! /f K
sae /7
1a•L
»
e,OP0/!• tr
,so to • ISM
tw-Ir
Le, •Oath � r
tI0•/,I
q N 01 1a aff
frl..�
!a-w 1tOPfa• I♦
J IR
K0. 1a
t
t
MI-01
cRIM(+ M V
1a0-r
[f N Iw If
!s-1Y /wL•P
f 1 fM
b• to
,Cfwlia Y
! A
rI 1.•
(w t0f1� M f.f
)I4-01
10 so ! .t \7t
COP'•aMM
-a'" O
at►a•
owftat•
we ti I IP
/'I•-1r
cet twae0a 1. OPa
ttf-17c
•M sN. aa• 717
At f1J w cows
fL ra ►•
MI --a•
c"
• ttl A
I M l a
lw •atLam l • A
w• 1 A,
c(.. 0 •0 to •
Wo It
Ctlwalta
tla N
/:t-r
RwKf w
!
aM-./
fOt+aMl® J • •
fa'7 -N
q N ! !t K
Alto
/a•ti 1.01 CO.1M•
e�tr�t• IC iv
a11'+•
!'M!f MI
�a wN IaM
taf 1»
[s..a:010 LA • h
q N a1 11 M
orall
1111 IaI
fwlm• N �
!• 17
1
MKlO w A
tl.-1!
IN
H- aN N
CON • Ii M
OW
I/N faa
M- eN f•' Ir caMlt• w N
al:-ll
Llwf.(wa R COP
f1a'tr
Ca`1011_ a• W tt
.fltl0 w ILO
11.- 1i]
aN-If1
tII N ! 11 w
+-'ff-tl-IS
VW too .! n to
ta.-M
sw-1a1
[aaLOY w t♦
itt fM.
Ca,
fI'
•flt-w
1
N as .L 1 In
I!-N. eistow OP !
to
tt1 'w
ONW4" w 111►
fr] 1w
.41,
. N� 11
N,..♦
�-1af. sit.ILL
N►lN Owe.
f..w Owa a,A OP' 1w
!►w
IMPOSE •et O
to. Dec 1senum ar
717 1i•
.
1 cglr - so I.t
In-u
n N i n N
.a►1w
f11-I•. C�a17I
�•a"1
([s,a tlw R Isle
Af ud
le •a.• P L.
an-tti
q :s C[. :) f•
rf-fi
M
N►•.K /i/a a.f :
IIa-Ifs
L.ftlfla M •11•
C0a1,•f L. •0Yw
a1a-.0a
1f
CAPl0 at' I! Q
N
1N
.T►�
O7-a• 11w.f'.I aIL ■ r
a/1•.
1...,
71, ,
CY/f• to I■�
Me
cc N ! ci
M� tat...a Lw w w
N,'1s
folt�tef w •
N) s0
�. t0••1f • r
.• M
op. l.f
aN-Iw
q N ,o I.
q N i 1• ►
Y'-t)t
>•I-If1 Cwru ..L • 1R
flla M •fa` 1•
^'MIT M ft
)1• x
10Mw1.•
Cf1a•... CIN w w•
1N'N
H N ! la w
I1f, 1M
a10 • w
a"
�M M r
N iI`
L1sa.Ia. hN N r
/tr ai
f7•-Ire fwT
M► Ifl fAiN
.at t 1♦,
:..
gar IM
w f w•
000wwsolomta
IID M
I tofu.••• LI.O " w
Mf 1»
q M a0 1. Nw
atr 17f
aM In••.
moup 1l i.l •y f aK
OP • �tf
II!-af
lf�..«
, Calf-,:.
Lslw !♦ la
1»
1Ma-1N
q M N t• a.s
t. 11 ! 1• q
af0-11/
tt['Is.
(IO r.• M f OP-lA
»,•N L. [R
M-tea
�y�yP
t1 i �1
f� :1..
[01i/•a•
q1/a.• vow wM[ alaa
1M..lY
O q M 14 N■
)♦►n•
M /M 0i YN M •
a�41.
*
- Cole•• r1/r 11 aflr
2Ai-.N
q N Ir I• L.
N ! I. aOP•
0-11
tfi• Ib
w OA fr •a .aa 0,
a!•4I
- an.
fa. . o.
1 duo". "tow a!
Ilk" f
Rf
City of ORONO COUNCIL MEETING
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL r1ov ~ r , �~
NO.
CITY OF ORONO
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF'
COUNTRYSIDE MANOR 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation
organized and E-Yisting under the lams of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted
subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe
development of land within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for
a subdivision plat by Lake Minnetonka Homes Incorporated;A Minnesota
Corporation, the subdivider; and
WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all standards
of the RR-lB zoning district finding that each lot is of a size and
configuration that will allow its use as a single family residence to be
fully developed without the need of any variances; and
WHEREAS, Outlot A is not platted as part of this scheme but is
intended for future development. The lots as shown in this second
stage of the Countryside plat have been designated so as to assure
future lots within Outlot A Access by interior plat roads.
WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of
the platting regulations of the City, including:
1. Dedication of drainage and utility easements.
2. Creation of a new private road shown on the plat and to be
known henceforth as Manor Circle.
3. The subdivider has dedicated to the City a road and utility
easement granting to the City access, improvement and
utility rights over that portion of the temporary cul de sac
not included in the dedicated right of way of Countryside
Drive.
4. All five lots created by the current plat, Countryside Manor
2nd Addition, will be subject to the same restrictive
covenants filed against Outlot A, Countryside Manor that
advises all future benefitting property owners of their
share in the responsibility of the maintenance and repair of
Countryside Drive until that time in the future when the
subject road is a through road connected to Old Crystal Bay
Road South. The covenents further advise that at the time of
the City's acceptance of Countryside Drive that it will be
the henefitt.irq property owner's responsibility to bring
th:lt road up to current City standards.
P, nF 1 oS ?
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
Dedication to the City of a Flowage and Conservation Easement
providing for limitations on the use of wetlands and/or
drainageways described therein and shown on the Plat as
"drainage easements".
6. Execution of a Subdivider's Agreement providing for
installation of certain improvements as a condition of
�;ubdivision approval.
7. Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fee in the
amount of $1,000.00.
8. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the
plat, easements and covenants in the amount of $75.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the
City of Orono hereby approves the plc-,t of Countryside Manor ?nd
Addition, Hennepin County, Minncsct,; subject to the following
conditions:
1. Subdivider must provide amended road plans for Manor Circle.
Plans are to be approved by the City prior to construction.
2. Road bed and the retention pond located within Lots 1 and 2,
Block 3 must be installed and approved by the City before the
Building Department can issue a building permit for new
construction.
3. All seeding and/or sodding required by the Subdivider's
Agreement must be installed prior to issuance of a temporary
or permanent certificate of occupancy for new construction.
4. The aforesaid plat shall be f iled by the City of Orono wi th the
Hennepin County Recorder's Off ice on or before May 26, 1985,
together with a certified original copy of this Resolution
and executed copies of the easements and covenants noted
above.
The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the
plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it
will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for
subdivision review.
Dated this 26th day of November, 1984.
ATTEST:
City CIS rk
1`4; y o r
P,, 2 (. f
COUNCIL MEETI4G
NOV 26 1984
TO: Council
FROM: Jeanne A. MabLsth, Zoning Administrator CITY OF ORONU
DATE: November :1, 1984
SUBJECT: #838 Petition for Vacation of Portions of Maple Avenue -
Resolution
At your July 9, 1984, meeting Council conceptually approved the
partial vacation of Map'_e Avenue and was advised to table formal action
on the petition pending final approval of a proposed lot line
rearrangement of the Barr, Klint and Bernier properties. That
subdivision has been postponed to a future date and the applicants have
askr l tn.�-, the City proceed with the formal vacation. Staff sees no
problem v4.+-h the approval as long as the following is provided by the
applicants:
1. Access and utility easements for existing water and
sewer lines.
2. Quit claim deed of additional rightt of way for
Ivy Lane.
Staff recommends approval of the partial vacation of Maple Avenue
subject to the findings and conditions setforth in the enclosed
resolution.
1421 East Wayzata Blvd.
Wayzata, Minnesota 55391
November 19, 1984
Cit,i of Orono
Orono, 11innesota
Attent.i.cm: Jeane Habusth
Re: Proposed subdivision (lot line rearrangement) for Douglas E. Klint
of tract V, R.L.S. No 461
Dear Jeane,
I would like to withdraw rr aonlication for the above lot line rearrangement.
It would appear that there is a better way to divide this Property, which
would be more beneficial to all concerned. As- soon as a consensus is
reached on this nee lot line rearrangement, I would like to reserve the
opportunity to resubmt this saris ratter at ;hat time.
you eery much for your kind cooperation; and consideration.
ZVe ,
i�
uglas E. Kl'
DI : J 8
�850" 3
CA�CO COVE
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR
DOUG KLINT. THOMAS BERNIER a GARY BARR
OF TRACT V. R. L. S. NO. 461. LOTS 160-42, 04 8 PART Of
185 SPRING PARK, AND PART OF VACATED MAPLE AVENUE
AND LOT BLOCK 1, IVY ESTATES
e,,l
oar I--
r'r r l. y ac+ 1. 2 L• rn
C'�•vN�/W'dTt'� LbU►�CY�S
i
: !reeky ae-ttfy that trio n.reoy was
Prepore4 by m or uodor g oast opr�
Violin and twat : M a duly AglaMnd !And
Sur";,sr under Ur laws of its State of
PUnrr oet o .
'...k..n �. G,'ITS .1 , 111C.
_•. .rfd,rV tea. Ira. 11,755
..w• aid !And '.ereeyoro
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
A RESOLUTION VACATING AN UNUSED PORTION OF
MAPLE AVENUE WITHIN THE PLAT OF SPRING PARK
SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 117, RANGE 23 IN THE
CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, cn May 20, 1984, Thom,-: Bernier, Gary Barr and Doug
Klint filed a petition with the City of Orono requesting the vacation of
a portion of Maple Avenue originally dedicated in the plat. of Spring
Park legally described as follows:
That part of Maple Avenue lying Westerly and Southwesterly of a
line drawn from the most Northerly corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Ivy
Estates, to the most. Easterly corner of Lot 184, Taylor's
Subdivision of Spring Park Lots, and lying Northeasterly of a line
described as follows: Beginning at the Southerly corner of Tract
V, Registered Land Survey No. 461, files cf Registrar of Titles,
County of Hennepin; thence Southeasterly along the Southeasterly
extension of the Southewesterly line of said Tract V to the
centerline of said Maple Avenue; thence Southwesterly along said
centerline to its intersection with the Northwesterly extension
of the Southwesterly line of Lot 161, Winship's Subdivision of
Spring Park Lots; thence Southeasterly along said Northwesterly
extension to the most Westerly corner of said Lot 161 , and there
ending.
WHEREAS, after Jue published and posted notice, a public
hearing was held before the City Planning Commission on June 18, 1984,
regarding said vacation and all persons interested were given an
opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, after due standing and consideration, the Planning
Commission recommended approval of the requested vacation and the
Council of the City of Orono finds that said vacation, as proposed, is
in keeping with the public interest in consideration of the following
findings:
The vacation does not affect access to or use of any
adjoining property.
2. The City has not and does not intend to develop, improve
or use the dedicated right-of-way as a road except for
utilities and access purposes hereinafter described.
Page 1 of 2
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
3. The unimproved dedicated right-of-way as it exists
serves no public purpose.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the petition of Thomas Bernier, Gary Barr and Doug Klint is hereby granted a.)d that the portion
of M-1ple Avenue legally described above is hereby vacated. The
granting of the petition is subject to the following conditions:
1. Upon vacation-, Thomas Bernier and Doug Klint must
combine the vacated portions of Maple Avenue with their
respective homestead properties (Lot 1, Block l Ivy
Estates and Lot 184 Taylor's Fubdivision of Spring Park
Lots).
2. Upon vacation, Doug Klint and Thomas Bernier must.
execute a utilities and access easement for existing
municipal water anc sewer lines that intersects the
vacated portion of Maple Avenue, granting easement
rights to the City over, under and above that vacated
portion of Maple Avenue.
3. Upon vacation, Doug Klint will quit claim deed to the
City additional right-of-way for Ivy Lane providing
five (5) feet for maintenance ditch along travelled
roadway.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota
at a regular meeting held Noveii.ber 26, 1994.
ATTEST:
Do,-othy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. ButlerY
, Ma or
Page 2 of 2
1�.
COUNCIL MEETING
NOV 21; 1984
TO: Council CITY OF ORONO
FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator
DATE: November 19, 1984
.'UBJECT: #861 Steven Pauly, 3980 Dahl RoaJ - Variance
Attached is a resolution for approval of the proposed 1,250 sf
additional hardcover in the 0-75' zone conditioned upon removal of an
equivalent 1,250 sf of hardcover in the 0-75' and 75-250' zones,
resulting in no net increase in overall hardcover on the property, per
your direction on November 13, 1984.
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO
MUNICIPAL. ZONING CODE: SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 i 2 - FILE l861
WHEREAS, Steven Pauly (hereinafter "the applicant" ) is owner
of the property located at 3980 Dahl Road within the Cicy of Orono
(hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows:
That part of Lot 4, Section 8, Township 117 North, Range 23
West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as follows:
Commencing at meander corner between Sections 7 and 8,
Township 117, Range 23; thence South along line between said
Sections to a point where a line running East at right angles
to said Section line from same to shore of Lake Mirnetor.ka
wi11 include 2 acres off North part of Lot 4 said Section 8;
thence at right angles East to shore of Lake Minnetor':a;
thence Northerly along said shore to beginning, 2 acres;
(hereafter "property"), and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance
to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions I and 2 and 10.55
Subdivision 8, to permit the construction of decks and an addition to
the existing house 28 feet from the lakeshore where a 75 foot setback is
required, and to allow an increase in hardcover in the 0-75' foot
setback zone from 2,866 square feet (or 7.5%) to 4,116 square feet (or
10.81) where no hardcover is allowed.
NOW, TIIEREFORF. BE: IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as zoning file #861
2. The property is located in the Lk-lB Single Family
Lakeshore Residential Zoning District.
3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application
on September 17, 1964, and recommended approval of the
proposed variances based upon the following findings:
a) The existing house it; located almost entirely within
the 0-75' setback zone and it would he a hardship to the
owner to move the entire structure in order to meet the
setback and hardcover requirements.
b) The steep slopes at the house site constitute a
hardship to the property.
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
4. The Council. finds that a complete tradeoff in hardcover
is possible i f portions of existing hardcover within the 75-
250' Lakeshore setback zone are removed in conjunction with
the removal of portions of existing hardcover within the 75'
Lakeshore setback zone. This will result in no overall net
increase in hardcover.
5. The City Council has considered this application
including the findings and recommendations of the Planning
Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant
and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety
and welfare of the community.
6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on
this property are peculiar to it and clo not apply generally to
other property in this zoning district; that granting the
variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions,
light, air nor pose a fire hazard or ether danger to
neighboring property; would not. merely serve as a
convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a
demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to
preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and
would he in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning
Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22,
Subdivision 1. and 10.55 Subdivision 8 to allow construction of Jec'
and an addition to the existing house 28 feet from the lakeshore where a
�r 75' setback is required, and a variance to Section 10.22 Suhdivisi in 2
to allow an increase in hardcover in the 0-75' setback zone from 2,866
square feet (or 7.51 ) to 3, 390 square feet (or S.9%) where no hardcover
is allowed, subject to the following conditions:
City of ORONO
RLZ;DLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
1. Existing hardcover in the amount of 1,250 square feet
must be removed prior to issuance of certificate of
occupancy, resulting in no net increase in hardcover
over the entire lot. Items to be removed include:
0-75' Zone
Concrete Block Patio . . . . 176 sf
Shed Near Lake . . . . . . . 130 sf
Gravel Driveway Apron . . . 420 sf
75-250' Zone
Gravel Driveway Apron . . . 524 sf
Total Hardcover to be Removed . . 1,250 sf
2. Applicant is hereby advised that the City will not
approve any future improvements that result. in additional
hardcover in the 0-75' setback zone, and that if such
improvements are proposed that they be counterbalanced with
the removal of existing hardcover.
3. Applicant is advised that the existing boathouse is a
legal, non -conforming structure and :s subject to the
pertinent ordinances.
4. Authorities granted by this variarce run with the
property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and
must be exercised byapplication fur a bui ld.ng permitwithin
one year of the date of Council approval, ar this variance
will expire on that date (November 26, 19b5).
5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and
conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of
the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority
<Iranted herein, and shill be punishable as a misdemeanor.
1984.
A1'7'ES7':
Clty Of OR
ONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
6. 'I'he u n d e I s i
hereb g es to gned 'PPl i `'ant read
himself I , the terms of has undErstooa his heirs, successors and asE,ut1on and °" behalf of
and
the recording of this resolution in the chair, ns•herebyagrees to
a'n of title of the
Adopted by the City Council on this 26th (13y Of pe'Ci'R1ki(`1',
ho ° fi11in,
City `erk
�Proferty Owne
--
Y C 'per
4 3 PI'Ope— r y
Mary c. ''ut er 3`yor
C y of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) J J
COUNTY OF 1AF14NEPIN )
On this
day of
, 1994, before
me a `rotary
Public
wlthln and l:or
Sc31d^ COUrlty, personally
appeared
known to me to
b__ e th_e-
_p_erson(_ sj �descr abed
11-and who executed the
foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged
that he (they) executed the
same as his
(their)
free act and deed.
MY COMMISSION EXPIRZS
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF hENNFPIN )
-------�--
On this — -_ day of -_ -, 1984, before me a Nlot.ary
Public WICK- n and far said County, personally appeared
know:i to me to
-the person{s) described in and -who executed the foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same es his
(their) free act and deed.
NOTARY PUBLIC
MY COnr,I �S ION EXPI FiE:� - -
COUNCIL MEETWO
TO: Orono Council NOV 26 19P4
FROM: Jeanne A. M.ibusth, Zoning Administrator
CITY OF ORONO
DATE: November LO, 1984
SUBJECT: #869 James Phelan, 1231 wildhurst Trail - Final Subdivision -
Resolution
Mr. Phelan has -,,)mpl.ied with all conditions of preliminary approval
except for one. F.ubmission of signed mylars.
In consideration of the following:
1. Time of year - pressure on all developers to get their
subdivisions filed before the end of the year (subdivisions
filed after the first of the year require immediate payment
of real estate taxes due in 1985).
2. Agenda for December l0th meeting is already overburdened
with final plat approvals.
3. Phelan's plat is not complex --the mylar can be signed by
mayor and clerk at any time after approval of plat. Copies
of the mylars have been approved by staff and will be
available at the meeting for review.
Staff recommends approval of the plat HEATHERCROFT subject to the
findings and conditions set forth in the enclosed resolution.
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF
HEATHERCROFT
WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation
oryarized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the (-ity of Orono has adopted
subdivision regulations for the orde_ly, economic and safe
development of land within the City; ane
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the subdivision
application for a plat by James M. Phelan, the subdivider; and
WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found tomeet allstandards
of the LR-1F zoning district finding that each lot is of a size and
configuration that will allow its use as a single family residence to be
fully developed without the need of any variances; and
WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of
the platting regulations of the City, including:
1. Dedication of drainage and utility easements.
2. Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fee in the
amount of $100.00.
3. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the
plat, easeme.ts and covenants in the amount of $75.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Counci 1 of the
City of Orono hereby approves the plat of HEATHERCROFT, Hennepin
County, Minnesota; subject to the following conditions:
1 . Plans for sewer connection to Lot 2 must be approved by Ci y
prior to issuance of a building permit for the new residence.
2. A sewer unit fee of $225.00 must be paid with building permit
for new residence.
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
3. Access to Lot 2 must be approved by the Public WorY,s
Coordinator.
4. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with the
Flennepin County Recorder's Office cn or before May 26, 1985,
together with a certified original copy of this Resolution.
The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the
plat has not been f i led by the date specif ied above. In that event, it
will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for
subdivision review.
Dated this 26th day of November, 1984.
ATTEST:
Citv Clerk Mayor ---__
COUNCIL MEETIN
NOV G 1g�4
TO: City Council
FROM:
John R.
Gerhardson,
Public Works CoordinatoCITY
r O F O R O N O
DATE:
November
23, 1984
SUBJECT: Water Rate Review - Orono Residents - Wayzata Customers
Recently the City of Orono received complaints from two res den`.s in
Orono who are served by the Wayzata water service area. The
complaints state that the formula for water rates equitable. in that area are not
City Engineer Glenn Cook will respond to the complaints on Monday
evening, November 26, 1984.
COUNCIL MEETING
NOV 2 G 1984
TO: City Council CITY OF ORONO
FROM: Joan Lattin, Office Coordinator -
DATE: November 15, 1924
SUB.IHCT: Three Month Salary Review - Therr!s•i Na•ib
Theresa Naab was employed by the City of Orono on September 4, 1984, as
an Administrative Secretary. During the past three months Theresa's
job performance has been exceptional and she has readily adapted to the
various duties assigned to her. I have attached a copy of my memo
regarding Allocation of Duties - Secretarial Staff. Theresa will
also be a back-up for Pam Sutton as City Recorder.
I recommend a salary increase of 4%, she is earning-,,7.00 an hour with
the increase her hourly salary will be $7.28 effective December 3rd.
Her six month salary review will be on March 4, 11485.
TO: Walter R. Benson, City Administrator
FROM: Joan Lattin, Office Coordinator
DATE: August 2, 1984
SUBJECT: Allocation of Duties - Secretarial Staff
Dorothy Hallin, City Clerk's duties are as follows:
Preparation of Council agenda
Preparation for elections
Typing of resolutions, Administrator's memos and
correspondence also statistical typing
Central files
Theresa Naab, duties will be as follows:
Preparation of Planning Commission agenda
Handle all incoming and outgoing mail
Assessment searches
Homestead applications
Abatement applications
Special assessment combinations and divisions and any other
recording of combinations and divisions for City records
Update address book
Assist with issuing General Permits and Building Permits
Statistical typing
Pam Sutton, Recorder duties are as follows:
Attend all Council and Planning Commission meetings
Type minutes for Council and Planning Commission meetings
Building and Zoning files
Issue permits Building and General
Overload typing
ossociation of
n')etropolitan
municipaIities
November 7, 1984
Dear Local Official:
COUNCIL MEETING
N011 2 6 1984
CITY OF ORONO
The attached policies have been recommended by the five AMM
standing committees and Board of Directors for adoption by
the General Membership as AMM Legislative Policy for the
1985-1986 Biennium.
The General Membership meeting has been set for 7:30 P.M. at
the Richfield City Hall, 6700 Portland Ave. on Thursday,
December 6, 1984. This should give you and your council time
to peruse and discuss the various policy recommendations.
Policy adoption requires a two-thirds majority vote of
those present. Each city has one vote except the more
populated cities of Bloomington (2), Minneapolis (7), ana
St. Paul (5).
We look forward to your active participation in this very
important part of the AMM policy process.
Respectfully,
ftn,B kes, President
Association of Metropolit.. Municipalitits
INDEX
PART ONE
MUNICIPAL REVENUES AND TAXATION
PAGE NUMBER
I. MUNICIPAL REVENUES
A.
LEVY LIMIT REPEAL
1
B.
LEVY LIMIT MODIFICATIONS
_ 5
1.
Realistic Levy Base
1 - 2
2.
Commercial/Industrial Levy Base Growth
2
3.
Reverse Referendum
4.
Mandated State and Federal Programs
2 - 3
5.
Decreased lion Tax Revenue Special Levy
3
6.
Energy Special Levy
3 _ 4
'.
Service Shifts - Levy Limit Review Board
4
8.
Federal Revenue Sharing Replacement Funds
4 - 5
9.
Natural Disaster and ;,awful Order Special
5
Levy
10.
FICA Base Adjustments
5
C.
LOCAi GOVERNMENT AID
5 - 6
D.
PROPERTY TAX
6 _ g
1.
Tax Exempt Property
6
2.
Property Tax Distribution From County
6 - 7
3.
Railroad Property Taxation
7 - 8
4.
Unit A sse:;3ed Value For Budgeting
8
`..
Malting Structures Property Class
9
I1.
E .
ASSESSMENT EQUALIZATION
3
-
10
1. Coefficient of Dispersion Penalty
9
-
10
'. Sales Ratio Equalization
10
F.
GENERAL FISCAL IMPACT POLICIES
10
-
11
1. Tax Increment Financing
10
2. Fiscal Note--,
1J
-
??
3. Electronic Transfer of Funds
11
PART TWO
GENERAL LEGISLATION
GENERAL
LEGISLATION
12
-
30
A.
PELRA PAOUII)ION S
12
-
13
B.
POLICE AND FIRE PENSION PROVISIONS
13
-
14
C.
CABLE COMMUNICATIONS
14
-
16
D.
INDUSTHIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BOND
16
-
?7
ALLOCATION
E.
OPPOSE MUNICIPAL BOND SALES CONTROL BY THE
1.1
STATE
F.
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS - DAY LABOR
17
G.
CPPOSE STATE OR METROPOLITAN LICENSING CF
17
-
18
GENERAL TRADE CONTRACTORS
H.
UNIFOhM BUILDING CODE
18
1.
MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BOARD
18
-
19
J.
VETERANS PREFERENCE
1")
K.
F.MPLO.EE DISABILITY - LOCAL POLICE: AND FIRE
19
-
1`0
FUND:1
L.
POLICE OFFICER ELIGIBILITY AND RECRUITMENT
20
-
21
M.
JUDICIAL. SYSTEM
21
-
23
N.
DATA PRIVACY AND OPEN MEETING
23
0.
ONE CLASS OF BEER
23
P.
OPPOSE INITIAT'VE - REFERENDUM FOR ZONING
24
ORDINANCES
Q.
SHADE TREE DISEASE CONTROL PROGRAM
24
R.
TREE REMOVAL. AND TREATMENT LICENSING
24
-
25
S.
LIMIT NEW AUTHORITY FOR STATE AUDITOR
25
-
36
T.
PERA BENEFITS, FINANCING, AND ADMINISTRATION
26
-
30
U.
TORT LIABILITY LIMITS
30
V.
EMPLOYEE TIME/DISTANCE REQUIREMF_NTS
30
PART THREE
HOUSING IN THE METROPO'ITAN AREA
III. HOUSING PROBLEM (INTRODUCTION),
31
-
36
A.
EXAMINE LOCAL REQUIREMENTS
32
B.
MANDATORY STANDARDS AND ALTERNATIVE HOUSING
32
C.
PROGRAM LATItUDE
33
D.
RENEWAL OF FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING
'•3:.
't.,
E.
LOCAL HOUSING PROGRAMS - AUTHORITY/
33
-
34
RESPONSIBILITY
F.
FINANCING HOUSING POLICIE:,
34
G.
PRACTICES WHICH INCREASE HOUSING COSTS
34
H .
RENTAL. NOUN I NG
35
-
36
PART FOUR
METROPOLITAN AREA I33UES AND CONC'E:R )
IV. PHILOSOPHY, ISSUES, AND CONCERNS (INTRODUCTION)
37
-
54
A.
PURPOSE OF METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENTAL
37
-
38
AGENCIES
B.
CRITERIA FOR EXTENSION OF POWrR
38
C.
STRUCTURES, PLANNING, FUNDING - SERVICES/
38
-
41
PROGRAMS
D.
METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE ACCOUNTABILITY
j41
-
43
E.
DEVELJPMENT IN ADJACENT COUNTIES
43
-
44
F.
MINNESOTA INTERGOVERNMENTAL. REVIEW OF
44
-
45
FEDERAL PROGRAMS
G.
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING - ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
45
-
46
PROCESS
H.
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING - LOCAL AND REGIONAL
46
INTERACTION
I.
REZONING - FIRST CLASS CITIES
46
-
47
J.
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL BUDGET
47
-
48
K.
SEWER AVAILABILITY CHARGE (iAC)
48
-
49
L.
PARKS AVD OPEN SPACE FUNDING
49
-
50
M.
SURFACE dATER MANAGEMENT
50
N.
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT
50
-
51
0.
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
51
-
54
PART FIVE
TRANSPORTATION
V. TRANSPORTATION
55
-
62
A.
MNDOT HIGHWAY FUNDING
5`_r
-iv-
C.
REGIONAL. TRANSIT BOARD (RTB)
55
-
56
D.
HIGHWAY JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES
56
-
57
E.
STATE AND COUNTY HIGHWAY TURNBACKS
57
-
58
F•
'3C' TRANSPORTATION PROCESS
58
-
59
G.
METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM FUNDING
59
H.
TAXI CAB REGULATIONS
59
-
60
I.
LIGHT RAIL. TRANSIT ALTERNATIVES
60
-
61
J.
CITY SPEED LIMITS
61
-
62
K.
MNDOT/CITY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS
62
L.
MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE TAX
62
M.
BIKEWAY FUNDING
62
t a::t Gy
rrv10::s
sh—
mm
LEGISLATIVE POLICIES
1985-1986
MUNICIPAL REVENUE AND TAXATION
I -A 5% LEVY LIMIT REPEAL
The Asso ation of Metropolitan Municipalities has consistently
opposed the levy limit laws in that they apply uniform statewide
restriction:, to cities and are too inflexible to accommodate
inflation, uncertanties in state and federal financial aids, and
the diverse problems and circumstances faced by cities throughout
the state. Such laws are inconsistent with principiei of local
self-government and accountatility. 1either do they recognize
changing local conditions as to either eypenditire needs or
revenue sources. Levy limits may ultimately work against the
interests of local taxpayers because the law creates an incentive
for cities to take maximur,, advantage of the opportunity to make
general or special levies. For examYle, the arbitrary decision in
1981 to create a new levy limit base effectively penalized those
cities that were successful in holding down their property tax
levies in 1981. History has now provided cities with numerous
lessons teaching that cities which choose to levy less than the
maximum allowed in a giver, year risk being later tied to
unrealistic or artifically low new limits for future budget years.
Therefore,
THE AMM REMAINS STRONGLY OPPOSED IN PRINCIPLE TO SUCH LIMITATIONS
AND RECOMMENDS THAT THE MINNESOTA LEGISLATURE REPEAL LEVY LIMIT
LAWS FOR CITIES.
I-B LEVY LIMIT MODIFICATIONS
Although the AMM is strongly copp„zed to Levy Limitations as
currently legislated, the organization is aware that there is
significant legislative initiative to maintain the responsibility
for local Groperty tax levels. Hore.er, :oval government must
eontinut dr.,; be allowed to prcvide f-r services that -Pole demand
and that state and federal law require. Therefor.:, if repeal. is
not :adopted, the Association supports aner,'A4ments to the ;resent
levy limi`, law to provide furti,er relief from current inequities.
H-1 REALISTIC LEVY BASE
The 1983 legislature restored the }rc 198' levy base formula of
local government aids plus levy limit, on which annual growth is
calculated without regard to actual levy. This method provides
that cities may levy less than the limit without losing the
ability to regain the underlevy in future years. The leg .ature
also provided growth based r)n an index rather than a flat
percentage and growth increase for the greater of population or
householdr, and some base growth for commercial and industrial
activity. All of thc:F- erowth fa.t. r: are neces:-,,ry a-, minimum
'.o allow cities the ability to at least stay even with service
provisions for the varying population needs.
THE AMM SUPPORTS CONTINUED USE OF THE: CURRENT LEVY BASE ADJUSTMENT
FACTORS AS A MINIMUM FOR FUTURE LEVY YEARS IF THE LEGISLATURE
FINDS IT PHILOSOPHICALLY NECESSARY TO CONTINUE LFVY LIMITS FOR
CITIES OVER 5000 POPULATION.
B-2 COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL LEVY BASE GROWTH.
:he current levy limit law recognizes that increased houses and
reopie require increased revenues to provide services. The law
also recognizes that new commercial industrial expansion causes
!.e» city costs and therefore, provides a special levy for three
:ears equal to the amount of revenue raised by applying the
general mill levy to the increased value and provides one-half the
special levy as a base increase at the end of three years.
Without some growth factor, all services for new commercial and
industrial property would have to be provided from existing
revenue, thus reducing service to the remainder of the community.
Without additional revenue to provide this service, considering
netrop,,litan fiscal disparities, a very real disincentive exists
allowing any type of new or expanded commercial/industrial
trcwt"%. Unfortunately, with only half the growth factor after
fiscal disparities added to the base, city residents are
subsidizing services to commercial/industrial projects.
'herefore,
':HE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE: TO PROVIDE A 100% LEVY BASE INCR17ASE
FOR NEW AND EXPANDED COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL GROWTH SO THAT
SERVICES MAY BE PROVIDED WITHOUT DECREASING SERVICE TO THE
EXISTING RESIDENTS OF ThE CITY.
B REVERSE REFERENDUM
:he 1981 legislature eliminated the Reverse Referendum procedure
which allowed &:local governing body to increase its levy oase.0y.
up to 10% it.::iet aras at 8% or more of the levy limit the previous:
year. The law restricted use to a one time 10% increase or
_p to 10% in multiple steps and public he&ring procedures. The
Increase was subject to a referendum if a petition was
presented containing signatures equal to 5% of the numbe: of
persons voting at the previous general election. If no petition.
.as received, the increase becomes effective. This provision
provided a measure of flexibility for cities, and counties that
needed base increases for various reasons.
THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE RE-ENACT THE REVERSE REFERENDUM
PROVISION TO ADD FLEXIBILITY FOR LOCAL UNITS.
H-4 MANDATED STATE: ANU FFI)FHA. PRCGRAM:
The cost of local government i3 being influenced more and more by
both state and federally legislated mandated programs and
increased mandated benefits or costs for in -place programs. Due
to current levy limitation restrictions, the ability of local
government to pay these: incrc�;.ned cost . i:_, severely re., tricted,
thereby causing in many instance,, a reduction i the level of the
traditional service functions of pollee, fire, --treet, etc. There
is a vast range of mandated program increases which have no
bearing or relationship to the anr,uai I allowed levy 11rnikt
increase. Some of these include worker's compensation benefit:,,
binding arbitration, federal ^ocial security, minim-wm wage laws,
comprehensive planning, Critical Areaz Act, Shorelines Act, OSHA,
etc.
THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO RECOGNIZE THAT MANDATED INCREASED
EXPENDITURES IN ONE PROGRAM WITHOUT A CORRESPONDING IN^.REASE IN
FUNDING ABILITY MANDATES A DECREASED EXPENDITURE IN T%E OTHER
SERVICE AREAS SUCH AS PUBLIC SAFETY ETC., AND THEREFORE, WHEN SUCH
INCREASES ARE MANDATED THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD PROVIDE A PERMANENT
LEVY LIMIT BASE INCREASE TO OFFSET THE NEW COSTS.
B-5 DECREASED NON TAX RFVENUE SPECIAL LEVY
The 1981 legislature eliminated the Decrea:,Ed Nor, Tax Revenue
special levy by rolling the 1')151 act.L'L levy int: the 'Levy bane.
The primary purpose of this special 'Levy waz to pr(,vide a method
ON an annual basis to recapture revenue decreafe3 in,
prinicipally, municipal liquor store operation:, using the current
year as a comparison to 1911 revenue:> modified by inflation. Wnen
the Levy Limit law was initiated in 1971, it did not consider that
a major share of sorre; c i t ie: Genera 1 tJ.Idt;et rt!ven,e dal' derived
from the liquor store revenue. Since 19;', these revenues or
profits have remained :on-tant or in many cages actual:;declines:,
thus causing severe problems because levy increases were only
teased on actual 19'; 1 property tax levy. The decrease,. non tax
revenue special levy was initiated in 19'13 and modified in 1980 to
reiu•dy this pro4laA6. ..�.: .,
THE AMM ENCOURAGES THE LEGISLATURE: TO RE: -INSTATE THE DECREASED,
NON TAX REVENUE SPECIAL LEVY USING 1981 A:.) A BASE YEAR TO MORE
ACCURATELY REFLECT THE CURRENT INCREASE OR DECREASE FROM.
MUNICIPAL ENTERPRISES SUCH AS LIQUOR STORES.
B-6 ENERGY SPECIAL LEVY
There has been a tremendous interest in energy related And
developing methods of saving energy in the part fe. 'ear5. IL i..
recognized that fuel conservatior, measures art nec�L:_sary ar.,:, in
fact, federal and utate legit:ration hits bear; t>.ssrd requiring,
certain energy :;avinC.. measure... :`iLic_ „rt ru,uired tmake
facility energy audits which are basica'ly paid for through energy
grant,. However, facility changes and capital expenditures, some
required and others that make sense, must be implemented using
local revenues. In many case; these revenues are not available
because of levy limitations. Therefore,
THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO ENACT A SPECIAL LEVY TO PAY FOR
COSTS INCURRED FOR ENERGY IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING REPAIRS AND
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES.
B-7 SE W CE SHIFTS -LEVY LIMIT REVIEW BOARD
Doe to aiminishing state funding of county ;ard city services and
; 1gUening levy limits. all units of local governm%;nt have been
modifying service procedures and increasing revenues where
possible. For many years some counties have provided services to
cities on a contract basis for police, prosecution, jailing,
assessing, etc. In order to free up funds for other services,
sore counties have been shifting a much larger burden: of cost for
these services to the city at a much greater increase than ; or
K. An actual prime example of this is as follows: One county
nE s done the assessing for all units within the county on a
contract basis for one dollar per year. This cost has been funded
within the county levy base. However, for 1983 the county charter
a:tual costs to the local units, as high as $23,000 for one city.
.ne city has the option, to pay or hire its can assessor. It car,
neither because its base does not include any funds fur this
p.rpc:e. Because of the law the county can free ap, that base levy
__ be used for other purposes. This type of activity is more
canno% where cities contract with the county sheriff for police
service and have no control over cost increases.
THE AMM STRONGLY UF+GES THE LEGISLATURE TO RE-ESTABLISH A LEVY
!:MIT BASE REVIEW BOARD AND AUTHORIZE THE BOARD TO ADJUST CITY
LEVY BASES FOR SERVICE SHIFTS AND EXCESS COST INCREASES FOR
CITY/COUNTY CONTRACT SERVICES SUCH AS POLICE, PROSECUTION,
JAILING ASSESSING, ETC. WHEN IT CAN BE WN THAT IT IS A NEW
-COST TO THE CITY OR A COST INCREASE IN E.
S OF THE STANDARD LEVY
BASE INCREASE.
B-8 FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING REPLACEMENT FUNDS
Zince 472 the cities in Minnesota have become more and more
ceper.vent upon Federal Revenue Sharing. Currently almost all
cities are using some or all of their revenue sharing allocation
for normal general operating expense::, and many of these same
cities are at, or near, levy limits. If Federal Revenue Sharing
is eitter discontinued or reduced, carrvU ly these is no
alternative method to raise revenue to replace the !Ssn. In some
cases the resulting, cuts in novice will Le a def;nice threat to
tr.e general, healtr, welfare, an! c'Ir -ty ' f rany _f )ur city
residents. Therefurc,
THE. AMM REQUEST:) THAT THE LEGISLATURE ENACT A PROVISION IN Ti
LEVY LIMIT STATUTES TO PROVIDE A LEVY LIMIT BASE INCREASE TO
REPLACE ANY FUNDS LOST THROUGH REDUCTION 0P DISCONTINUANCE Or
FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING TO CITIES.
B-9 SPECIAL LEVY - NATURAL. DISASTER A14D LAWFUL Qfi'iE;i
The 1977 LeEislaturc eiimiriated number of socuial levies,
including those for x�xpend i tur•e:; c funds as a result of natural
disasters arid lawfu' oraers, neither --f which a city car. plan for
or has any control over. Lawful ordFrs are a result of not being
able to implement some sfi::te o.• federal regulation. Natural
disasters, such as the 1977 and 1978 heavy rains which caused
severe flooding in the ;metropolitan area, can ccruse unnatural
large expenditures for emergency repair to city facilities.
Neither of these are used often, but when r;eeded are absolutely
nece:.:,ary.
THE AMM URGE^ THE LEGISLATURE TO REINSTAT, THE SPECIAL LEVIES FCR
LAWFUL ORDERS AND NATURAL DISASTERS.
B-10 FICA BASE ADJUSTMENTS
Normally FICA - Social Security Withholding - is directly
proportional to payroll. However, in recent years the employer
contribution percentage and amount of salary FICA is paid on, has
Increased drastically, well abov^ inflaticn rates.
THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE ENACT A LEVY BASE INCREASE
PROVISION TO ALLOW FOR THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE NORMAL LEVY BASE
INCREASE A:. OWED BY THE LEVY LIMITATION LAW AND THE FICA INCREASE
MANDATED BY THE. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
I -C LOCAL GG'. ERNMF.NT A I D
Local Quvernment Aid distribution from the State to 411AAI-es,Aas
been a much debated issue the past several years in the
legislature and amung varicus city groups. In the past 16 years
the distribution has ranged from a pure per capita formula to a
need formula ba;:ed on valuation and service expenditure leve'.
Possibly because of the distribution debate or because aids tc
local government are easy target3, the legislature significantly
reduced it-- commitment to the aid programs and property tax relief
in the early 1980's to sole, a major portion of the :,evere
economic rece3sirn in the +te. Thus for a period of time,
property taxe7 increased ;ignif,,caritly to replace diminished state
revenue to local units of government without corresponding local
service increase:-. Now that the recession has ended, economic
rerovury in occuring and state revenues area increasing, it is tiros
for the state to renew commitmei,,. to maintaining a reasonable
level of property taxes and local services by once again funding,
],.)cal government aid programs. Although, the debate will
undoubtedly continue as to the appropriate formulas for
distribution of aids because of the vast difference in cities
within the state, the legislature :should not abrogate its
authority nor lose sight of the overall need to ma:rstain stable
and reasonable property tax levels.
THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO RFNEW THE COMMITMENT TO ALL
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND MAINTENANCE OF REASONABLE PROPERTY TAXES BY
INCREASING ITS FUNDING OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID PROGRAMS ON AS FAIR
AND EQUITABLE BASIS AS POSSIBLE. THE LEGISLATURE MAY NEED TO
CONSIDER ADDITIONAL NEW AND CREATIVE METHODS OF SOLVING UNIQUE
LOCAL FUNDING PROBLEMS SEPARATELY FROM THE GENERALIZED FORMULAS.
I-D PROPERTY TAX
D-1 TAX EXEMPT PROPERTY
Cne of the glaring inequities in the Minnesota tax system involves
"he free local services that are provided to tax exempt properly
owned by the state and by certain nor,-Eovernmental organizations.
It is wid,--y acknowledged that such property benefits directly
from governmental services such as police and fire protection and
street services provided by cities and counties. However, since
there is not legal basis for ciair,,ing reimbursement for the cost
of such services, they are borne by the local taxpayers.
Furthermore, such property is concentrated in certain citiez and
counties resulting in a heavy cost burden in certain parts of the
state.
THE ASSOCIATION nELIEVES THIS PROBLEM SHOULD BE CORRECTED BY
ENACTINC LEGISLATION REQUIRING BOTH THE STATE AND
NON -GOVERNMENTAL OWNERS OF TAX EXEMPT PROPERTY, EXCEPT FOR
CHURCHES, HOUSES OF WORSHIP, AND PROPERTY USED SOLELY FOR
EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES BY ACADEMIES.",:'.COLLEGES, UNIVERSITIES AND
SEMINARIES OF LEARNING, TO REIMBURSE 'CtTIES AND COUNTIES FOR THE
COST OF POLICE, FIRE, AND STREET SERVICES.
THAT THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD ALSO CONSIDER PROVIDING REIMBURSEMENT
FOR THESE SERVICES FOR ALL STATE OWNr:) FACILITIES, INCLUDING STATE
UNIVERSITIES.
D-2 PROPERTY TAX DISTRIBUTION FROM COUNTY
Counties are supposed to distribute 70% of the collected property
tax funds on hand as of the 20th. day of the month following
collection date within 30 day;, and the remainder within 60 dais
t.. 8% interest accruing after 4; day:;. Cities may request, and
reva ive an early payment. Some of the Metropolitan Counties are
not forwarding the special assessment collection portion upon
early request nor are the delinquent tax collections forwarded on
a uniform and timely basis. Recently, the legislature modified
school payments by requiring 70% distribution within 7 working
days and the remainder within 14 working days of the settlement
date. Ironically, the first half property tax payment is at the
beginning of school districts fiscal year, whereas, many cities
have had to borrow operating funds at market interest to cover
costs for the first 6 months of operation. It is not practical
nor possible in most cases for cities to accumulate enough reserve
funds to cover normal cost.n from Vanuary 1 through dune 20.
THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO MODIFY THE PROPERTY TAX
DISTRIBUTION PROCESS FROM COUNTIES SO THAT CITIES ARE TREATED
EQUAL TO SCHOOL DISTRICTS BY REQUIRING AT LEAST 70% OF ALL FUNDS
ON HAND AS OF THE SETTLEMENT DATE,INCLUDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS,%
BE PAID WITHIN 7 WORKING DAYS AND THE REMAINDER PAID WITHIN 14
WORKING DAYS. ANY INTEREST EARNED BY THE COUNTY WHILE HOLDING THE
FUNDS SHOULD ALSO BE DISTRIBUTED. FURTHER, THE LAW SHOULD CLARIFY
THE PROCESS FOR DELINQUENT PROPERTY TAX COLLECTIONS SO THAT THESE
FUNDS ARE NOT HELD BUT FORWARDED WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD AFTER
COLLECTION WITH ANY INTEREST ACCRUED BY THE COUNTY
D RAILROAD PROPERTY TAXATION
The existing system for taxation of railroad operating property is
not consistent with the taxation of other commercial and
industrial properties. The present formula values railroad
operating property at about 2 % of the value which would be
determined by a local a33ev .or using generally accepted assessing
principles. The AMM recommends that a new system of property
taxation be established which, enable railroads operating in
Minnesota to be taxed consistent with the taxation of other
commercial and industrial properties. This system should contain
the followirg features:
A NEW FORMULA SHUULu BE DEVELOPED FOR THE VALUATION OF RAILROAD
OPERATING PROPERTY FOR PROPERTY TAX PURPOSES. THE NEW FORMULA
SHOULD CONTAIN TWO EQUAL FACTORS. ONE OF THESE FACTORS SHOULD BE
FIFTY PERCENT OF AN AMOUNT BASED UPON: THE AVERAGE VALUE OF ALL
OF THE TAXABLE LAND IN THE: CITY OR COUNTY TIMES THE AREA OF THE
RAILROAD OPERATING LAND PLUS THE VALUE OF RAILROAD OPERATING
STRUCTURES AS DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL ASSESSOR. THE OTHER FACTOR
WOULD BE AN AMOUNT BASED ON EITHER THE STOCK AND DEBT OF THE
RAILROAD OR THE; CAPITALIZATION OF EARNINGS APPROACH.
'OPERATING LAND' IS DEFINED TO MEAN ANY LAND WHICH UNDERLIES THE
OPERATING STRUCTURES DEFINED BELOW AND RIGHTS -OF -WRY ADJACENT
THERETO AND WHICH IS NECESSARY TO THE INTEGRAL PERFORMANCES OF
RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION SERVICES.
"OPERATING STRUCTURES" IS DEFINED TO MEAN ALL STRUCTURES OWNED OR
USED BY A RAILROAD COMPANY IN THE PERFORMANCE OF RAILROAD
TRANSPORTATION SERVICES,INCLUDINr WITHOUT LIMITATION, FRANCHISES,
BRIDGES, TRESTLES, TRACKS, SHOPS, DOCKS, WHARVES, BUILDINGS AND
OTHER RELATED STRUCTURES. ALL OPERATING STRUCTURES EXCEPT
RAILROAD BRIDGES, TRESTLES, TRACKS, DOCKS AND WHARVES, SHOULD BE
TAXABLE.
THE PRESENT SYSTEM FOR VALUING AND TAXING NON -OPERATING PROPERTY
SHOULD NOT BE CHANGED.
NO TAXING JURISDICTION SHOULD LOSE REVENUE BECAUSE OF THE CHANGE:
FROM THE EXISTING UNIT VALUE SYSTEM TO THE NEW LOCAL ASSESSMENT
SYSTEM.
-4 UNIT ASSESSED VALUE FOR BUDGETING
Due to fluctuating or decreasing state aids and credits and
increasing assessed values in property it is difficult for local
units to judg^ the impact of budget decisions on individual
property taxes. Only one or two counties in the Metropolitan Area
provide a close estimate of local units total assessed values in
time for use during the local budget process.
THE AMM URGES THE METROPOLITAN COUNTIES TO PROVIDE LOCAL UNITS
WITH AT LEAST A CLOSE ESTIMATE OF TOTAL ASSESSE) VALUE OF THAT
UNIT BY AUGUST 1ST. FOR USE DURING THE BUDGET PROCESS.
D-5 MALTING STRUCTURES PROPERTi CLASS
Recently a Minnesota Tax Court decision declared that portions of
the structures used in the process of converting grain into malt
were attached machinery and therefore exempt from real property
`,axa'ion. The impact of this decision on property taxes in
certain areas w'th"W 'concentration of malting operations is
significant. In addition the AMM is concerned that based on this
precedent the courts could extend the exemption to any structure
specifically designed for warehousing certain goods or commodities
such as grain elevators. The legislature has specifically
designated electric generating plants and equipment as real
;roperty subject to property taxes. Therefore,
THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE TO SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATE ALL
STRUCTURES USED IN THE PROCESS OF CREATING MALT FROM GRAIN AS
WELL AS STRUCTURE USED FOR STORAGE: AND DRYING GRAIN TO BE REA:.
PROPERTY SUBJECT TO PROPERTY TAXATION.
I-E ASSESSMENT EQUALIZATION
Unequal property assessment, both within and among the various
taxing jurisdictions, has been a concern of the legislature in
past sessions due to overlapping tax levies by county, school and
various special districts. For various aid formulas, the state
has utilized sales ratios as an offsetting equalizing factor so
that distribution of aids will be accomplished on as fair and
equitable basis as possible. The legislature has also adopted a
penalty provision effective in 1986 based on coefficient of
dispersion which is calculated from the sales ratio and has
discussed penalty provisions based on the sales ratio itself.
However, sales ratios individually and collectively are inherently
flawed, inaccurate, and at best are only general indicators. Many
factors not associated with :c'vil value of a piece of property
can affect the sales price of >;. property. A farmer may buy a
40 or 80 acre parcel for well 'market value' ao ar add on to
a current farm and justify the by spreading the extra expense
over the entire farm. A person with a very large rinwnpayment or
access to good finar^ g may be able to purchase a house with a
very low or non -exist underlying mortgage well under the
'market value'. On Lne other hand, someone with very limited
downpayment may pay well over the market rate for a house with a
high underlying assumable mortgage. Many other economic and
personal reasons may enter into purchase price of property. Also,
in many cases there just are not enough sales in a class of
property to accurately determine a sales ratio in a given
geographic area. Finally, to keep ratios from constantly jumping
Lap or down from year to year and to level out statistically the
activity, the Revenue Department disregards some sales that are
out of line for various reasons and uses two year samples to
create a ratio. At best, sales ratios and various, statistics such
as the coefficient of disperson are only general indicators. They
are tools to be used to determine cases of inconsistancy and
provide a basis for constructive help to assessors. Imprecise
sales ratios are generally in the ball park and computed in such a
way as to be consistantly imprecise for all units. Therefore, as
just one of several factors in aid formulas, they may be a
necessary ingredient to provide as uniformly as possible an
equitable distribution. However, because sales ratios and
oefficient of disperson measurements are imprecise and were
basically developed as tools to determine general trends, they
should not be used as precision measurements for penalties or
bonuses.
E-1 COEFFICIENT OF DISPERSON PENALTY
THE AMM URGES THE. LEGISLATURE TO REPEAL THE COEFFICIENT OF
DISPERSION PENALTY PROVISION.IF THE LEGISLATURE DETERMINES A NEED
EXISTS, THE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE SHOULD BE MANDATED TO ORDER A
REASSESSMENT OF AN AREA BY AN INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR IF THE
COEFFICIENT OF DISPERSION INDICATORS FALLS TO SOME LEVEL BELOW
NATIONAL STANDtRDS OF ACCEPTABILITY. THE COSTS OF SUCH
REASSESSMENT SHOULD BE BORNE BY THE RESPONSIBLE ASSESSING
JURISDICITON.
E-2 SALES RATIO EQUALIZATION
Whereas, taxing units in the seven -county metropolitan area are
subject (1) to certain area -wide levies and (2) to Fiscal
Disparity allocations, it is necessary to ensure tax equalization
among these varicus tax units. In 1984 the legislature authorized
the Revenue Department to study new methods of calculating sales
ratios by including adjustments for financing, etc.
AFTER THE SALES RATIO STUDIES ARE IMPROVED BY INCLUDING ALL
FACTORS OF SALES THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD ENACT LEGISLATION WHICH
MANDATES AT LEAST A 90% SALES RATIO FOR ALL CITIES WITHIN THE
SEVEN-COUNTi METROPOLITAN AREA, THE SALES RATIO SAMPLE TO BE
EITHER DONE OR AUDITED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND
REQUIRING THAT THE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE SHALL M4KE AGGREGATE
INCREASE IN THOSE CITIES BELOW 90%. THE SALES RATIO DETERMINATION
FOR THESE PURPOSES TO BE MADE 014' THE BASIS OF A 12-MONTH PERIOD
SAMPLE, BEGINNING NO MORE THAN 18 MONTHS BEFORE THE ASSESSMENT
DATE.
THE AMM OBJECTS TO SALES RATIO BEING USED AS A BASIS FOR PENALTY
OR BONUS OF STATE AID FUNDS.
I-F GENERAL FISCAL IMPACT POLICIES
F-1 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
Tax increment financing has permitted many cities in various parts
of the state to define and carry out rehabilitation, development,
housing, and economic development projects on their own
initiative. It represents the most feasible and effective legal
strategy which is currently available to cities in preserving and
improving the physical ap ,g9tonomic environment in their
communities. /,
THE AMM BELIEVES THAT PRESENTLY NO SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES ARE
NECESSARY AND RECOMMENDS THAT NO SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES BE MADE BY
THE LEGISLATURE UNTIL THERE HAS BEEN SUFFICIENT EXPERIENCE TO
DETERMINE IF CHANGES ARE NEEDED.
F-2 FISCAL NOTES
Many laws are passed each year by the legislature which have a
substantial effect on the financial viability of cities. Some or
these, such as revenue and tax measures, have an obvious any
direct effect which is often calculated and reported during the
hearing process. However many others, such an worker's
compensation benefit increases,, mandated activities, binding
arbitration and other 'Labor related legislation, social programs,
etc., are not viewed during the bill process as to the fiscal
impact on cities. Due to the current restrictive levy limitation
laws, many of these hidden costs are causing severe reductions in
the standard services which must be provided by local units.
THE STATE SHOULD ADOPT A POLICY OF "DELIBERATE RESTRAINT" ON ITS
MANDATED PROGRAMS, INCLUDING A MANDATORY FISCAL NOTE IDENTIFYING
LOCAL GOVERNMENT COSTS ON ANY NEW MANDATED PROGRAMS WHEN T`iEY ARE
INTRODUCED IN THE LEGISLATURE, AND A STATEMENT OF COMPELLING
STATEWIDE INTEREST TO ACCOMPANY ALL STATE MANDATES.
F-3 ELECTRONIC TRANSFER OF FUNDS
Currently Hennepin, Ramsey and Carver Counties may transfer
payments from the county checking accounts directly to the school
districts bank account. This eliminates mail or personal delivery
delays, does not cost the county any interest loss z;lnce money is
transferred from savings to checking as soon as warrants are
Issued, and does excelerate the local unit's earning power on the
money by as much as three or four days. Any method of efficiency
which not only saves money but increases local funds should be
initiated. Therefore,
THE AMM REQUESTS THE: LEGISLATURE ENACT LAW ENAB, ING ELECTRONIC
TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM COUNTY TO CITY IN THE SEVEN COUNTY
METROPOLITAN AREA TO PROVIDE EFFICIENT AND COST EFF'CTIVE FUND
TRANSACTIONS.
GENERAL LEGISLATION
II -A MINNESOTA PUBLIC EMPLOYEE LABOR RELATIONS ACT (PELRA)
The AMM recommends that the followinE changes affecting cities be
made.
A-1 DISCIPLINARY ACTION
Employees presently have a variety of grievance procedures
available to them, including civil service systems, veterans
preference, and thu equal employment opportunity act.
EMPLOYEES COVERED BY A PELRA AGREEMENT SHOULD BE ABLE TO SPECIFY
WHICH PROCEDURE SHOULD BE USED BY THEM OR SPECIFY A DIFFERENT
PROCEDURE IN THE AGREEMENT, THUS PRECLUDING AN EMPLOYEE FROM
INVOKING TWO PROCEDURES FOR GRIEVANCE.
A IMPASSE RESOLUTION
PELRA SHOULD BE AMENDED SO THAT THE EMPLOYEES MUST EXERCISE THEIR
RIGS! TO STRIKE WITHIN 15 DAYS FOLLOWING THE EMPLOYEE'S REFUSAL
TO ARBITRATE OR FORFEIT SUCH RIGHT. CURRENT TIME LINES SHOULD BE
ELIMINATED. AUTHORITY TO DECLARE AN IMPASSE SHOULD REST SOLELY
WITH THE MEDIATOR
A-', SUPERVISORS AND CONFIDENT'AL EMPLOYEES WITH PUBLIC
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
SUPERVISORS OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES SHOULD HAVE THEIR MANAGEMENT ROLE
ACKNOWLEDGED AND HAVE THEIR STATUS LIMITED TO MEET AND CONFER.
IN NO EVENT SHOULD SUPERVISORY OR CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES BE
REPRESENTED BY AN EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION WHICH REPRESENTS THE
NON -SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES THEY SUPERVISE. THE TERM 'SUPERVISORY'
SHOULD BE AS PRESENTLY DEFINED .UNDER PELRA FOR NON-ESSENTTAL
EMPLOYEE SUPERVISORS. THE DEFINITION' OF SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES
SHOULD NOT BE FURTHER LIMITED. TO DO SO WOULD ESSENTIALLY
PROVIDE ThAT IN ALL BUT. CITY MANAGER CITIES, NO EMPLOYEES COULD
BE CONSIDERED TO BE SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES FOR PURPOSES OF THE
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT LABOR RELATIONS ACT
A-u RIGHT TO STRIKE:
THE EXISTING CLASSIFICATION OF ESSENTIAL EMPLOYEES SHOULD FE
ELIMINATED AND ALL EMPLOYEES ORGANIZED UNDER PELRA GIVEN THE
RIGHT TO STRIKE. WITHIN THE LIMITED RIGHT TO STRIKE, THE PUBLIC
EMPLOYER WOULD HAVE THE OPTION OF EITHER REQUESTING ARBITRATION
WITHIN A SPECIFIC TIME: OR ALLOWING EMPLOYEES TO LEGALLY STRIKE.
A-5 BINDING ARBITRATION
In the past several years, the legislature has modified the
essential employee binding arbitration procedures by changing
from conventional to issue by issue final offer, returning to
conventional, and finally adopting a short time issue by issue
final offer which has been challenged in court. A final
resolution should be made to avoid the confusion caused by
Jumping from one to the other. Issue by issue final offer
provides some advantages over conventional arbitration. In issue
by issue final offer, the parties must negotiate in good faith
and each arrive at a reasonable position on each issue or face an
obvious loss of that issue, whereas in conventional, the final
outcome is left solely to the judgement of an arbitrator whose
knowledge of unique local conditions and financing may be
somewhat limited.
THE AMM STRONGLY URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO ADOPT A SYSTEM OF ISSUE
BY ISSUE FINAL BEST OFFER ARBITRATION FOR MUNICIPAL ESSENTIAL
EMPLOYEES IN ORDER TO PROMOTE THE BEST OPPORTUNITY FOR
NEGOTIATION IN GOOD FAITH BY BOTH PARTIES.
A-6 PICKET LINES
NO CITY EMPLOYEE SHOULD BE PERMITTED TO REFUSE TO CROSS THE
PICKET LINES OF OTHER CITY EMPLOYEES.
II-B POLICE AND FIRE PENSION PROVISIONS
i.ocal police and full time fire relief associations were phased
out by the 1980 legislature, unless the local council. opts to
keep the relief association. All new employees will become part
of the state police and fire PERA fund and the state will
reimburse local units for a portion of the unfunded liability
remainiL'7' in the local fund. Employee contributions were set at
a%. However, the Legislative Retirement Commission has in the
past established a general policy requiring public safety
employees to pay 40% of the normal pert"= -costs. .hese changes
have greatly helped solve a most ser'i4as problem, but a few minor
ad ustments are still necessary. The AMM believes that:
B-1 PORTABILITY
SOME FORM OF PORTABILITY INTO THE PERA POLICE AND FIRE FUND
SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO MEMBERS OF LOCAL POLICE AND FIRE RELIEF
ASSOCIATIONS IF THEY TAKE A PUBLIC SAFETY POSITION IN ANOTHER
GOVERNMENTAL UNIT BEFORE THEIR PENSION BENEFITS ARE VESTED. THE
PERA LAW SHOULD ALSO BE AMENDED TO PERMIT A MEMBER OF THE PERA
POLICE AND FIRE FUND TO CONTINUE PERA COVERAGE WHEN THE MEMBER
TAKES A PUBLIC SAFETY POSITION IN A CITY WITH A LOCAL RELIEF
ASSOCIATION.
B-2 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION AMOUNT
EVEN THOUGH THE EMPL(�tEE CONTRIBUTION AMOUNT WAS SET AT 8%,IN
MANY FUNDS THIS IS NOT EQUIVALENT TO 40% OF THE NORMA,, COST. THE
AMM URGES THAT THE CONTRIBUTION LEVEL BE SET AT 40% OF THE NOVMAL
COST OF FINANCING THE BENEFITS EVEN IF THIS AMOUNT EXCEEDS 8%
OF BASE SALARY. ANY INCREASE IN BENEFITS FOR CURRENT EMPLOYEES
INCLUDING ANY RESULTING DEFICIT, SHOULD BE FINANCED 5O% BY THE
EMPLOYING CITY AND 50% BY EMPOYEES ON A CURRENT BASIS.
II-C CABLE COMMUNICATIONS
Nearly all of the cities in the Metropolitan Area have formed
single or joint powers Cable Service Territories (CST) as have
many of the cities in Minnesota outside the Twin City Area. The
franchising process in progress in these areas range from totally
served to under con:-truction to preparing RFP's for bids. Based
on recent court decisions and pending Federal Legislation it
appears that much of the control cities had in cable
franchising, rates, and the cable product is being eliminated or
transferred to the FCC and market place. However, the basic
franchising process and issues related to system interconnects
and regional. channel still remain state and local issues.
C-1 CABLE FRANCHISE PROCESS
Minnesota statutes provide a reasonable and flexible set of
guidelines for municipalities to establish cable service
territories even in a changing, federal environment.
THE AMM BELIEVES THIS LAW HAS ALLOWED LOCAL COMMUNITIES TO
PROVIDE I►?UT INTO AN IMPORTANT COMMUNITY SERVICE AND THAT IT
SHOULD NOT BE MODIFIED TO DIMINISH LOCAL CONTROL.
C-2 METROPOLITAN<*EGIONAL CHANNEL NEEDS
The 1973 legislature mandated a uniform regional channel be set
aside, an entity to schedule programs and facilitate use of the
channel be designated, and the cable board should prescribe rules
for its operation and practi(:e which ;.hall insure that priority
be given to public use of the channel. To date, minimal 'needs
analysis' has been done to determine what type of programming
should be pr:)vided or even if there is a real need or desire on
the part of the general pudic an it relate:; to the cost ,f
providing a regional channel capability. It may be that after
definitive analysis there i., nct .sufficient ,u t.;fication, ever.
In light of some of the special interest activists claims, for a
regional charme 1 as mandated and that the Action mi i tit be
to attempt t!, repeal the mand.ite.
THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD ENSURE THAT A DETAILED NEEDS AND USE
ANALYSIS BE COMPLETED i0 DETERMINE THE JUSTIFICATION FOR A
REGIONAL CHANNEL AND THE TYPE OF PROGRAMMING THAT SHOULD BE
CONSIDERED PRIOR TO EXPENDING SIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS OF PUBLIC
FUNDS.
C-3 REGIONAL CHANNEL FUNDING AND ORGANIZATION
:f after thorough study, it is determined to proceed with
development of a regional channel, then certain criteria should
�e adhered to as well as some problems resolved. A major
controversary exists as to the appropriate funding mechanism for
regional channel programming. Many options exist including a
subscriber fee, a portion of local franchise fees, a program
generator fee, a general metropolitan property tax, or state
reimbursement for a state mandate. Very little study has been
done to identify which of these or what combination is truly the
fairest and most equitable. The structure anj creator of a
program entity could take many forms. The form chosen may in
fact dictate the type of programming, the financing, and the
degree of general public benefit or interest. There is also the
question of domination by a single segment of society or type of
agency which needs consideration. The State Cable Board has
designated a planning group composed of representatives from
nearly all segments, public and private, that have some interest
in the regional channel. This group is meeting to resolve the
above issues. As a guide to the working group, the State Cable
Board, and to possible legislation, the AMM recommends that the
following be considered:
FUNDING SHOULD INITIALLY BE APPROPRIATED BY THE LEGISLATURE FROM
A PORTION OF THE 6% SALES TAX REVENUES FROM CABLE SALES TO
SUBSCRIBERS SINCE THIS IS A NEW SOURCE OF FUNDS TO THE STATE AND
WOULD ENSURE THAT THOSE RECEIVING THE SERVICE ARE PAYING FOR THE
SERVICE, THE EXPECTED COST OF $250,000 IS LESS THAN 10% OF THE
NEW SALES TAX REVENUE TO BE GENERATED IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA
IN THE NEXT YEAR.
CONTINUING FUNDING SHOULD BE FROM THE STATE SALES TAX IN
CONJUNCTION WITH CONSIDERATION OF SOME FEES OR CHARGES TO THE
VARIOUS GROUPS BROADCASTING ON THE REGIONAL CHANNEL.
PROPERTY TAX AND FRANCHISE FEES SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AS
FUNDING ALTERNATIVES.
THE REGIONAL CHANNEL ENTITY SHOULD BE A 'NOT FOR PROFIT'
ORGANIZATION SIMILAR TO CURRENT PUBLIC TV AND RADIO WITH A BOARD
OF DIRECTORS REPRESENTING AND APPOINTED BY THE VARIOUS USER
INTERESTS INCLUDING MUNICIPAL AND REGIONAL AGENCIES. IF THIS
PREFERRED ORGANIZATION IS NOT ACCEPTABLE, THAN THE LEGISLATURE,
SHOULD CONSIDER CREATION OF A COMMISSION WITH APPOINTMENT BY THE
VARIOUS USER INTERESTS INCLUDING MUNICIPAL AND REGIONAL AGENCIES.
THE REGIONAL CHANNEL SHOULD PROVIDE PROGRAMXING OF BROAD
REGIONAL INTEREST VGRSUS NARROW SPECIAL INTERESTS AND NOT
ATTEMPT TO COMPETE WITH CURRENT COMMERCIAL CHANNELS.
PROVISION SHOULD BE MADE FOR A THOROUGH OVERSIGHT STUDY, AFTER
A "EASONABLE TES:' PERIOD, TO DETERMINE THE LONG TERM VIABILITY
Attu NEED OF THE: REGIONAL CHANNEL CONSILERING AT LEAST SUBSCRIBER
USE AND COST EFFECTIVENESS.
C-4 CABLE SYSTEMS INTERCONNECTION.
Ultimately, provision will be made to interconnect the various
cable service territories and systems in the metropolitan area.
The Metropolitan Councils Advisory Committee on
Telecommunications has recommended the formation of a commission
of Cable Service Territory Commissions to effect this
interconnection which is technically complex and does involve
issues within the individual franchise agreements.
THE AMM SUPPORTS FORMATION OF A COMMISSION OF CABLE SERVICE
TERRITORY COMMISSIONS TO FACILITATE THE U...IMATE OVERALL
INTERCONNECTION OF THE VARIOUS CABLE SYSTEMS IN THE METROPOLITAN
AREA.
II-D INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BOND ALLOCATION
In 1984, the Federal Government adopted various restrictions in
the use of Industrial Development Revenue Bonds which included a
$150 per capita cap for each state per year through 1986 and then
$100 per capita for 1987. The allocation for Minnesota equalled
approximately $600 million per year. In response, the State
Legislature adopted an allocation program for 1984 and 1985 which
dedicates $95 million to the state, $404 million to entitlement
cities issuing at least an average of $1 million in three._ Qf_:tte
last four bears, and $101 million for non entitlement eiLy uon.
Any amounts nct issued or committed by August 31 Will revert to
the non entitlement pool. A 19 point project criteria was
developed to judge applications to the non entitlement :.
However, some of the points seem redundent, skewed to :r
citirl, arl not project oriented, thus making it difficu or
small %cn untitlemunt cities to compete, even with good projo ,ts.
THE: AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE: TO CAREFULLY REVIEW THE 1984 118
BOND STATUES TO ENSURE; A FAIR AND EQUITABLE OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL
MINNESOTA CITIES TO UTILIZE THIS FUNDING MECHANISM FOR
ECONOMIC AND JOB CREATION GROWTH. SPECIFICALLY THE: REVIEW SHOULD
EXAMINE THE. ALLOCATION FORMULA, THE STATUTORY CRITERIA FOR
PROJECT:,, ENTITLEMENT iDINT POWERS AGREEMENTS, AND BOND SALES
TIME LINES. FURTHER, THE: AMM WOULD SUGGEST THAT VARIOUS
INTERESTED AGENCIES AND CITIES 3E GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO
PARTICIPATE IN THE PROCESS AND PROVIDE INPUT TO THE FINAL FORMULA
FOR FUTURE YEARS.
II-E OPPOSE MUNICIPAL BOND SALES CONTROL BY THE STATE
:egislation proposed in previous sessions would have made the
State Attorney General Bond Counsel for all municipal bonds and
Y:aced authority for selling all bonds with the State Investment
P:ard. This could lead to increased bond costs and lengthy
relays in bond issuance. The AG office does not have the
rr:fessional competency to be recognized by bond buyers and would
need years and a great deal of money to develop the competency
necessary to eliminate a dual opinion from the private sector.
'::;is would also be a step in the direction of government
'..:reaucracy taking over a function of private enterprise which is
_-mp etent and is working at a time when the public trend is
denanding less government instead of more.
THE AMM OPPOSES ANY LEGISLATION MAKING THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BOND
COUNSEL AND/OR THE STATE INVESTMENT BOARD SALES AGENT FOR
M'�NICIPAL BOND SALES. FURTHER, IF THE. LEGISLATURE PURSUES THIS
ISSUE, THEY SHOULD UNDERTAKE A DETAILED STUDY PRIOR TO ANY
LEGISLATIVE ACTION TO DETERMINE NEED, EFFECTIVENESS, AND COST.
I:-F PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS - DAY LABOR
.rater the Local Improvement Code, a $5,000 limitation is
established and if the cost of an improvement is estimated to
ex:eed this amount, the city is required to advertise for bids
f:r the improvement. However, there is no similar limitation for
4nprovements which are not financed by special assessments. Since
manY cities use their own employees to construct, remodel,or
a :ter city owned property and perform construction, repair and
na.,ntenance on city streets, roads, bridgez, and utilities, and
not special-lyassess these improvements to any benefited
rr ;arty owner',.the existing law does not apply to them. The cost
;f preparing specifications and various reports for bids on Lhese
..';es of projects would probably outweigh any potential cost
z_•::ngs by using private enterprise to perform these functions.
" sc, by requiring use of the 'prevailing wage rate', all public
costs could be increased causing higher property taxes.
:X7- PROVISIONS Or THE: UNIFORM MUNICIPAL CONTRACTING LAW ARE
SUFFICIENT TO ENSURE EFFECTIVE CONTROL OF PUBLIC FUNDS
EXPENDITURES SO Tti'.: FURTHER MODIFICATION OF STATUES REGULATING
HESE ACTIVITIES ARE NOT NECESSARY. LIMITATIONS ON THE USE OF
SAY LABOR BY CITIES FOR THE DOING OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SHOULI:
BE ENACTED.
:: OPPOSE STATE: Oh METROPOL;TAN LICENSING ` GE'NE:RA:, TRADE:
CONTRACTORS
Licensing of general trade contractors and various other
activities has long been a local prerogative, and the mechanism
for license review, issuance, and enforcement is already in
place. The primary reason that local licensing has been
successful and, therefore, maintained at the local level, is that
inspection and enforcement personnel reside at the local level,
know the area and activities, and are familiar with local
ordinance and restrictions, thus providing better and faster
enforcement. Suggestions have been made to form a statewide or
metropolitan wide licensing authority and split the revenue among
the licensing agency and various municipalities with the
municipalities maintaining enforcement tasks It is questionable
under this arrangement, if either the alter or municipalities
would have enough funds to accomplish the respective tasks. In
these times of economic stress it does not seem logical to
increase participation in an area that has and is being handled
effectively at the local level. Therefore,
THE AMM STRONGLY OPPOSES STATE OR METROPOLITAN TAKEOVER OF
GENERAL TRADE CONTRACTOR AND OTHER ASSOCIATED TRADE CONTRACTOR
LICENSING.
II-H UNIFORM BUILDING CODE
The 1979 Legislature virtually eliminated the use of the
mandatory uniform State Building code in outstate Minnesota by
providing adoption by referendum or, a county basis. Where
elections have been held, defeat has been overwhelming. The code
has been in effect in the 7 county metropolitan area for several
years and has been accep�ed and appears to be working as
intended. Some citier; would like to see the standards increased,
but recognize Lhe necessity of a uniform code and have no major
objections to its use. In fact, even though some legislators
have discussed elimination of its use in the metropolitan area,
there does not seem to be any objections to its use from public
bodies, the private sector, or general citizenry.
THE AMM STRONGLY OPPOSES ELIMINATION OF A MANDATORY STATE
BUILDING CODE IN THE SEVEN COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA.
II -I MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BOARD
Since its organization, the Minnesota Municipal Board h;.s
strengthened municipal government by providing a means for the
orderly and intelligent evaluation of pruposed incorporations,
consolidations and annexation: throughout the statf;. Recent
additions and changes in the commission's authority in annexation
and consolidation areas will encourage and foster an assessment
Or thf' f ,.=r goverrimt'Tita l f ramework of c e r t :i i n k i - C`
..9
of development and services in urbanizing fringe areas around
cities.
THE AMM REQUESTS THAT NO FURTHER CHANGES BE MADE: IN THE STATUTES
GOVERNING THE OPERATION OF THE MTNNESOTA MUNICIPAL BOARD.
II-J VETERANS PREFERENCE
The basic provisions of the uniform veterans preference law for
state and local government have over the years worked reasonably
well and except for a few changes to restore employee equity
should not be changed. The AMM recommends the legislature review
and modify the law as follows:
J-1 NO COMPENSATION FOR UNWORKF.D PERIODS
WHEN A VETERAN'S EMPLOYMENT IS TERMINATED AND HE OR SHE DOES NOT
REQUEST A HEARING WITHIN TEN DAYS, OR WHEN AN IMPARTIAL HEARING
BODY DET7RMINES THAT THE DISMISSAL WAS FOR JUST CAUSE, THE LAW
SHOULD NOT REQUIRE THAT THE VETERAN RECEIVE COMPENSATION FOR ANY
PERIOD WHEN SERVICES WERE NOT ACTUALLY PERFORMED.
J-2 ONE HEARING PROCEDURE
THE LAW SHOULD MAKE IT CLEAR THAT THE PETIT TO,', PROCEDURE IS AN
ALTERNATIVE TO LOCAL ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING. THE HEARING BODY
NEED NOT BE THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION (AT ITS OPTION) IN THOSE
CITIES THAT HAVE SUCH A COMMISSION.
J-3 PROBATIONARY PERIOD
THE LAW SHOULD BE MODIFIED TO ALLOW CITIES TO TERMINATE VETERANS
THE SAME AS ALL OTEER PERSON DURING THE PROBATIONARY PERIOD
WITHOUT HEARING.
II-K EMPLOYEE DISABILITY - LOCAL POLICE AND FIRE FUNKS
Ift hUmber of cities with local police and firetp6tinsion funds are
experiencing a problem with employees receiving disability
payments from the local fund and full worker's compensation
Payments totalling more in after tax take home pay than if they
were working. PERA policy and fire employees are prohibited by
law from receiving greater pay while on disability tha&„ while
working, but Minnesota Statutes 424.27 specifically prohibits
cities with local plans from correcting the above situation.
This quirk in the law is a costly one for cities and provides
impetus for marginally disabled employees to stay home. Why work
when you can make more by not working? Therefore,
THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO CORRECT MINNESOTA STATUTE 424.27
TO ELIMINATE THE ABILITY OF AN EMPLOYEE IN A LOCAL POLICE OR FIRE
-11-
FUND TO RECEIVE DOUBLE DISABILITY PAYMENTS WHICH EXCEED THE
NORMAL AFTER TAX WORKING INCOME. FURTHER, THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD
CLARIFY AND ESTABLISH STANDARDS SIMILAR TO PERA FOR DETERMINING
DISABILITY.
II-L POLICE OFFICER ELIGIBILITY AND RECRUITMENT
During the 1978 legislative session the :.egislature adopted a
uniform state licensing recruitment for police officers which is
unparalleled in any other area of the United States. The
requirements enforced by the Minnesota Peace Officer Standards &
Training Board (MPOST) stipulate mandatory minimum standards for
recruitment, training and conduct of police officers which
significantly infringe on the prerogatives of local government.
In conjunction with establishing the POST Board and rules and
regulations, the legislature also eliminated the former BCA
schooling and training program for entry level police officers.
The POST rules and regulatons became effective July 1, 1979.
Under these rules and regulations, any one interested in becoming
a police officer must have two years of law enforcement training
after which they are given a written examination administered by
POST. They are then required to take an eight week skill course.
Five institutions are certified as meeting POST requirement for
the 2 year training in the metro area; Metro U, Lakewood
Community College, Inver Hills Community College, North Hennepin
Community College and Normandale Community College. Under the
present operation, completion of the skills level requirements
can only be accomplished through full time day time attendance.
In the two years since POST has been in effect., several problems
have arisen The first of those problems deals mainly with the
age and maturity of the applicant now being tested for the police
officer position by metropolis- jurisdictions. Formerly that
applicant was predominately a to late twenty year old
applicant, many times possessin( ur year degree, however, not
necessarily related to the law iwt.wLteement area. Many applicants
were individuals interested In'& eamplete career change and often
times older and of more mature character. The two year law
enforcement degree requirement has now shifted that applicant to
a much younger age group. Applicants who have entered the law
enforcement program right; out of high school generally, compared
to the previous applicant pool, demonstrate a lack of maturity
and people contact experience. In many instances this
applicants' intere3t in police work is based on misrepresented
ideas of what police work is really like.
The second major problem with the present POST regulations is the
full time eight week;; skill course process. This process makes
it extremely difficult for an individual interested in a career
change, while at the same time beinE; required to work to support
a family, to take the time of;' n,,,-f :.:-.ary to complete the skills
training coursa.
These two problems have significantly inhibited police agencies,
particularly in the suburban areas, to attract a mix of
qualified police candidates.
Another problem is that protected class enrollment in
POST -certified schools is too low to provide police departments -
with an opportunity to hire qualified protected class group
members as police officers. Under current POST rules and
regulations, some cities may not be able to meet their
affirmative action goals.
The present regulations also effectively deny a police officer
candidate the opportunity to obtain, or police jurisdiction the
opportunity to provide on -the -job -experience and training prior
to becoming a full fledged officer. This practice is followed in
many other employment sectors through either an apprenticeship or
internship program. It works to the advantage of both the
employer and employee.
The present system of certifying police officers in the State of
Minnesota does not contain adequate flexibility to address
on -the -job -training and ulti:late certification through a one year
apprenticeship or internship program in lieu of 2 years of
formalized training.
AS A RESULT OF THESE PROBLEMS, AMM RECOMMENDS THAT T9E PRESENT
POST RULES AND REGULATIONS BE AMENDED TO PROVIDE. FOR FOUR-YEAR
COLLEGE GRADUATES TO TAKE AN EQUIVALENCY EXAMINATION AND UPON
SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE: EQUIVALENCY EXAMINATION BE ELIGIBLE
FOR HIRING AS A POLICE OFFICER WITH COMPLETION OF THE SKILL
:'RAINING ON A PART TIME. BASIS. FURTHER, THE AMM RECOMMENDS THAT
THE SKILLS TRAINING COURSES BE OFFERED THROUGHOUT THE METRO AREA
O`1 A PART TINE BASIS AFD THAT THE REQUIREMY.NT FOR ENTRY LEVEL
POLICE OFFICER BE Rr-EXAMINED THEREBY 1wRIKING AVAILABLE THE
OPPORTUNITY FOR APPLICANTS TO ASSUME: A POSITION OF POLICE OFFICER
WITH THE CONDITIONS THAT CERTAIN LEVELS OF TRAINING AND SKILLS
MUST BE ACHIEVED W17"AIN A REASONABLE. PERIOD OF TIME: NOT TO EXCEED
ONE YEAR PRIOR TO CERTIFICATION. THE AMM ALSO RECOMMENDS THAT
STATE LAW BE AMENDEL TO REQUIRE POST -CERTIFIED SCHOOLS TO DEVELOP
A RECRUITMENT SYSTiM WHICH PROVIDES ADEQUATE REPRESENTATION OF
PROTECTED CLASSES AND THAT THE: PRESENT POST RULES REGULATION:,
BE AMENDED TO A1.11OW COMPARABLE OUT-OF-STATE TRAINING COURSES A
A SUBSTITUTE FOR POST -CERTIFIED SCHOOL TRAINING. THIS
SUBSTITUTION SHOULD BE ALLOWED -jh-,Y /F THE CANDIDATE CAN PASS
AN EQUIVALENCY EXAM AND THE SKILLS C('URSE.
.. -.� JUDICTA1, SY,1Ti,M
The principal job of municipal government is to protect people
and their property. The people, through their property taxes,
pay a considerable amount for this protection primarily in the
form of police and fire service. For some while, police
departments and municipal officials have been frustrated by an
apparent leniency of judgements being handed down by our
municipal and district courts whereby, after having expended a
considerable amount of the public's money and often taking
considerable risks, a violator is apprehended and prosecuted in
court only to be turned out w th a suspended or light sentence.
In some communities youth crime and status offense have become
such a major problem that the traditional process is no longer
effective;. The courts and probation departments cannot cope with
'L,he magnitude of numbers and, therefore, youthful offenders are
more often Burned back with only a reprimand or not even
petitioned into the system for the first two or three offenses.
The negative effects of this process are twofold; 1) It tends
to reinforce the violator's lack of respect for others and their
contempt for the law, especially impressionable youth; and 2)
It is terribly demoralizing for our police departments and law
abiding citizens. Recent legislative initiatives such as the
promotion of work restitution programs, victim protection, and
stronger penalties for habitual c.'minals are helping, but more
emphasis is needed in the area of j,ivenile crime prevention and
penalities.
M-1 YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU
Youth service bureaus operating witnin or by joint powers
agreement among, a small number of communities and sponsored
through federal and state grants have proven successful in
curbing increased incidence of repetitive youth offense,
especially because of their ease and speed of access by local
clients. However, this concept is endangered due to funa
limitations caused by levy limit restrictions which do not allow
flexibility to start new programs or allow funding when. Federal
Grants run out.
THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD ENCOURAGE: LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO SPONSOR
YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU TYPE: ACTIVITIES AS A HELP AND BUFFER TO THE
COURT SYSTEM AND A PREVENTATIVE FOR HABITUAL YOUTH OFFENSE. THE
LEGISLATURE HAS ALREADY ALLOCATED SOME FUNDS FOR THIS TYPE OF
ACTIVITY, BUT TO SUCCEED MUST PROVIDE LOCAL UNITS THE ABILITY TO
FUND THESE PROGRAMS THROUGH THE LOCAL. PROPERTY TAX LEVY BY USE OF
A SPECIAL LEVY OR BASE: INCREASES.
M-2 YOUTH PUNISHMENT
Because of the increasing incidence: of youthful offenders, the
judicial system out of sheer burden tends to be somewhat lax in
-21'-
punishment until the offender has many repeated appearances
before the court.
THE AMM SUGGESTS THE JUVENILE JUSTICE TASK FORCE. INVESTIGATE
STRONGER ACTION FOR YOUTHFUL OFFENDERS, ESPECIALLY BEFORE A
PATTERN OF LAWBREAKING HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED, THUS DISCOURAGING
REPEATED ACTS BECAUSE THE YOUTH KNOWS THAT HARSH PUNISHMENT WILL
OCCUR.
"�. DATA PRIVACY AND OPEN MEETING.
Data privacy laws protect individuals from the release of
information to the public which the legislature has deemed to be
private or which could be unnecessarily harmful to the
individual. On the other hand, the open meeting law prohibits
local governmental units from holding closed sessions except when
d:scussi.�- pending or actual law suits with an attorney or labor
negotiations. Unfortunately, many occasions have arisen in past
dears where local units in dealing with individuals or employee
disciplinary matters have been fr ed to either violate the Data
Privacy Statutes or the Open Mek ng Statute in order to fairly
resolve the issue.
THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE TO MAKE THE DATA PRIVACY AND
OPEN MEETING LAWS CONSISTENT SO THAT TO COMPLY WITH ONE LAW A
CITY SHOULD NOT HAVE TO VIOLATE THE OTHER.
II-0 ONE CLASS OF BEER
:.egislation has been proposed in past years to eliminate the
manufacture and sale of 3.2 beer in Minnesota. If this were done
substantial problems could arise in control of the sale of strong
beer in service stations, grocery stcres, drugstores, and
elsewhere that 3.2 beer is presently sold.
IF THE MANUFACTURE AND SALE OF 3.2 BEER IS ELIMINATED IN THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA, THE, AMM STRONGLY URGES CONTINUED LOCAL
CONTROL OF LICENSING AND WOULD OPPOSE LEGISLATION MANDATING OR
GRANDFATHERING LICENSING OF 3.2 BEER SALES LOCATIONS WHERE THE
PRINCIPAL PRODUCT IS NOT STRON3 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES.
FURTHER, THE LAW SHOULD BE MODIFIED SO THAT AN ESTABLISHMENT OR
PERSON HAVING A LICENSE TO DISPENSE STRONG BEER DOES NOT NEED TO
OBTAIN AN ADDITIONAL LICENSE TO DISPENSE OR SELL 3.2
0:.A3SIFIED btE.R•
II-P OPPOSE INITIATIVE -REFERENDUM FOR ZONING ORDINANCES
The Municipal Planning Act has been interpreted to allow for
initiative and referendum (IR) in cities with charter provisions
allcwing for IR. There is evidence that this interpretation har.
interferred with cities' efforts to achieve their planning and
development goals, particularly in the housing field in the
metropolitan area.
First, the statutory procedure on zoning ordinances provides
ample opportunity for the participation of both the general
public and 'individual property owners in decisions relating to
zoning ordinances o► the Municipal Comprehensive Plan. It is
inappropriate to allow such a long deliberative process to be
overturned by a relatively few voters who may have narrow
interests in the issue.
Second, the clear intent of the existing planning law is that
zoning ordinances and amendments nog be subject to IR. Without a
clear uniform statutory procedure for the implementation of
municipal planning, statutory and charter cities will be subject
to different procedures and the intent of the act will not be
rea 1 i �,.ed . Therefore,
THE AMM SUPPORTS Ail AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL PLANNING ACT TO
PROVIDE THAT ZONING ORDINANCES AND AMENDMENTS NOT BE SUBJECT TO
CITY CHARTER PROVISIONS ON INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM.
II-Q "MADE TREE DISEASE CONTROL PROGRAM
Starting in 1977 the legislature made a strong commitment to
control Dutch Elm and Oak Wilt tree diseases by enacting an
excellent Shade Tree Disease Control progra�im and backing that
legislation with sufficient funding to bring the disea.- :; under
control. However, due to lack of financing in the most recent
past, Dutch Elm disease is once again spreading rapidly as it has
in other areas of the country when financial commitment has
stopped. Therefore, the AMM urger the legislature to:
Q-1 PROGRAM CON7TINiUATION
CONTINUE; THE SHADE TREE ..DISEASE CONTROL LEGISLATION WITH NO
CHANGES AND TO PERMIT CITIES TO USE SPECIAL LEVIES, SPECIAL
ASSESSMENTS, AND OTHER SOURCES TO FUND LOCAL CONTROL PROGRAMS.
Q-2 GRANT FUNDING
THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD ONCE AGAIN MAKE SHADE TREE DISEASE CONTROL
A TOP PRIORITY ISSUE AND RE: -ENACT THE GRANT PROGRAM AT A
SUFFICIENT LEVEL TO ACHIEVE A 50% SANITATION AND REFORESTATION
TARGET LEVEL.
II-R TREE REMOVA:. AND TREATMENT LICEASING
The high incidence of Dutch Flm and Oak Wilt diseas•_r has
understandably caused a large increase in the activity and
numbers of firms in the tree removal and treatment service
business. Several proposals have been made to initiate
Metropolitan or statewide licensing and setting of standards.
the Associations does concur that some form of consumer and
worker protection, as well as control of chemical Lreatment
activities, would be advisable. however, we would oppose
mandatory licensing on state or metropolitan level. Licensing of
contractors and various activities has long been a local
prerogative and the mechanism for license review, issuance and
enforcement is already in place. The primary reason that local
licensing has been successful and, therefore, maintained at the
local level, is that inspection an enforcement personnel reside
at the local level and are much more familiar with the area and
activities, thus providing better and faster enforcement. Most
local units currently have a tree inspector and some form of
control/removal program. It then logically follows that
licensing could most economically and efficiently be initiated
and enforced at this level.
R-1 ORDINANCE CONTROL
THE ASSOCIATION URGES MUNICIPALITIES TO ADOPT TREE REMOVAL AND
TREATMENT LICENSING PROCEDURES FOR THE PROTECTION OF PROPERTY
OWNERS, THE GENERAL PUBLIC, AND EMPLOYEES OF FIRMS ENGAGED IN
THAT SERVICE. TO THAT END, THE ASSOCIATION HAS DEVELOPED AND
WILL MAKE AVAILABLE TO INTERESTED MUNICIPALITIES A MODEL
ORDINANCE SETTING STANDARDS AND REGULATING THE ACTIVITIES OF TREE
REMOVAL AND TREATMENT FIRMS.
R-2 LOCAL LICENSING
THE ASSOCIATION STRONGLY SUPPORTS TREE REMOV..L AND TREATMENT
LICENSING AT THE PREROGATIVE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT BUT DOES
STRONGLY OPPOSE INITIATION OF MANDATORY LICENSING AND/OR
LICENSING AT THE STATE OF METROPOLITAN LEVEL IT IS RECOMMENDED
THAT THE STATE ESTABLISH UNIF"14 MIN�IXUM STANDARDS FOR SHADE TREE
TREATMENT CONTRACTORS AND BUSINESSES.
R-3 RECOGNIZING THAT THERE ARE EFFORTS ON THE PART OF SOME TO
LEGISLATE STATE OR METROPOLITAN WIDE LICENSING, THE AMM URGES
THAT IF AREA WIDE LICENSING IS CONSIDERED, THAT A PROVISION BE
INCLUDED ALLOWING A LOCAL UNIT TO REVOKE THE LICENSE PROVISIONS
WITHIN ITS JURISDICTION FOR CAUSE.
II-S LIMIT NEW AUTHORITY FOR STATE AUDITOR
The State Auditor issued a report dated April 14, 1982, entitled
'Guideline for the Audit Responsibility of Local Governmental
Units within Minnesota'. The report indicates that of 4,308
:nits of government including counties, cities, towns, school
.`stricts, intergovernmental agencies, and fire relief
associations only 1369 havF; a legal audit requirement and of
those the state auditor has mandatory audit responsibility for
370. The Auditor is suggesting that generally accepted auditing
standards (GAA00) are implemented in Minnesota, that uniform
accounting and reporting be standardized for all units, and that
all units meet uniform auditing standards. It is further
proposed that all units have an audit requirement (reporting
requirements for vci-y small units) and fall under the
jurisdiction of the state auditor whose office would be empowered
to audit each unit once every four years. Fees would be related
to actual cost. The local units of government would be expected
to select an audit firm with the approval of the state auditor.
Only audit firms passing a peer review (process established by
State Auditor) would qual ''y for doing audits. The state auditor
would prescribe all Qtandards, procedures, and reporting
requirements. While the AMM find] merit in the goal of achieving
a higher degree of efficiency and accountability, it is
questionable if it is necessary to create a burgeoning
bureaucracy that would in effect dictate which audit forms are
acceptable beyond the standards of education and competency
already in place. Do all units really need to comply with a
stardard audit which may imply costly conversion to accrual
accounting? Most units under 2500 population are on a cost
basis, while all units above that use accrual or modified
accrual. Is there really a need to standardize reporting between
cities and schools, or schools and counties? Reporting within
individual types of local units is already fairly well
standardized. the auditor currently reviews all audits and can
make suggestions on reporting or procedure modifications. This
proposal appears to suggest moving away from a well working
private sector service to a larger more controlled governmental
operation. It implies greater cost in times when all units of
government are trying to reduce costs.
THE AMM OPPOSES AS UNNECESSARY THE STATE AUDITOR HAVING
ADDITIONAL IN HOUSE AUDIT AUTHORITY AND THE ASSUMPTION QjF. POWER
TO D014#4WOR APPROVE AUDIT FIRMS FOR CITIES. •P'EVtH::
II-T PERA BENEFITS, FINANCING, AND ADMINISTRATION
The following principles should govern any changes the
legi:>lature makes in PERA and the other statewide pension plans.
T-1 HIGH FIVE YEAR BENEFIT BASE
The adoption in 19*13 of the "high five year" benefit formula for
PERA has provided very adequate pension benefits for career
municipal employees. Further shortening of the averaging period
would create windfalls for some PERA members and multiply
opportunitie,:; for manipulation of service and salaries to
maximize pension benefits without proportional contributions to
, - fur.d. Therefore,
THE AMM OPPOSES MODIFICATION OF THE 'HIGH FIVE' FORMULA.
T-2 GENERAL PERA BENEFIT INCREASES AND FUNDING
ANY INCREASES IN PERA BENEFITS SHOULD BE GRANTED ONLY TO THE
EXTENT THAT PROPOSED CONTRIBUTIONS AND CURRENT RESERVES ARE
SUFFICIENT TO FULLY FUND THE INCREASES IN THE OPINION OF ONE OR
!?ORE RECOGNIZED PENSION ACTUARIES WHO ARE INDEPENDENT OF THE PERA
3RGANIZATION. ANY BENEFIT INCREASE OR CONTRIBUTION REDUCTION
PERMITTED BY EXCESS RESERVES OR EXCESSIVE CURRENT CONTRIBUTIONS
OR COMBINATIONS OF THE TWO SHOULD BE OF SUCH AMOUNTS AS TO
BENEFIT THE EMPLOYER AND EMPLOYEE EQUALLY AS A PERCENTAGE OF
OVERALL EMPLOYEE SALARY.
T-3 EARLY RETIREMENT
Devices to promote early retirement, like the proposed rule of
75 for police are a very blunt instrument for cutting budgets or
.:Ee : i ng out dead wood.
BECAUSE INCREASING LIFE SPANS SHOULD LEAD TO AN INCREASE IN YEARS
OF EMPLOYABILITY, THE AMM OPPOSES EXTENSION OF THE RULE OF 85 AND
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RULE OF 75 FOR POLICE OR FIRE FUND MEMBERS
AS WELL AS OTHER PROPOSALS TO ENCOURAGE EARLIER RETIREMENT BY
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES.
7-4 RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE BY PERA
Among all the proposals for benefit increases, the one that most
threatens the financial soundness of PERA and other Minnesota
public pension funds, is the proposal to provide health insurance
to retirees paid from the pension fund. Full payment would
commit Lhe taxpayers to an open ended promise to pay a cost that
is escalattnk'11.4 1'.,the rate of 15% to 20% per year even in. Ipw,.,.
:nfIatio*i' y,falNs. Partial payment would provide .jj ,
foot -in -the -door for full payment. Eitner would hamper efforts
:.o control health care costs by making the recipient responsible
for a significantportior; of charges to encourage thrifty use.
IN ORDER TO AVOID RECURRING PROBLEMS SIMILAR TO THOSE EXPERIENCED -
BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN ITS PENSION PROGRAMS, THE AMM, OPPOSE
PAYMENT OF HEALTH CARE COSTS FOR RETIREES FROM THE PERA FUND.
T-5 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFIT:; BY CITIES
In order to prevent the creation of large unfunded deficits for
promised health care for retired public employees, in the same
way that unfunded actuarial deficits were created by promised
pension benefits prior to statutory requirements for funding, the
Association urger the legislature to impose the f'oIIowir,,_;
restrictions.
BEFORE AN GOVERNMENTAL UNIT MAKES ANY NEW COMMITMENT TO PAY ALL
OR ANY PART OF SUCH PREMIUMS OR CHARGES IT SHALL ASCERTAIN THE
ENTIRE COST. ANY GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY PAYING FOR RETIREE
BENEFITS SHALL BUDGET FOR THE: YEAR IN WHICH THE COMMITMENT IS TO
BE INCURRED, SUFFICIENT FUNDS TO COVER ALL PROJECTED CURRENT AND
FUTURE COSTS WHICH WILL ACCRUE DURING THAT YEAR, AS DETERMINED BY
A LICENSED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTA14T OR RECOGNIZED ACTUARY. ANY
GOVERNMENTAL UNIT PAYING ANY PART OF THE COST OF RETIREE BENEFITS
AUTHORIZED BY THIS SUBDIVISION, OTHER THAN INCLUDING RETIRED
EMPLOYEES IN A SINGLE GROUP WITS{ ACTIVE EMPLOYEES, SHALL
ESTABLISH A SEPARATE DEDICATED FUND FROM, WHICH THE COST OF THESE
BENEFITS SHALL BE PAYABLE AND SHALL BE AUTHORIZED TO LEVY AND
COLLECT A TAX, IF NECESSARY, IN THE NEXT ANNUAL TAX LEVY FOR THE
PURPOSE OF PROVIDING THE NECESSARY FUNDS FOR TEE PAYMENT OF SUCH
PROJECTED COSTS.
T-6 GENERAL RETIREE BENEFITS
IF ANY INCEEASE IN BENEFITS IS ENACTED FOR PERA RETIREES, THE
RESULTING COSTS SHOULD NOT BE PAID FROM THE PErA FUND, BUT RATHER
SHOULD BE FINANCED BY A DIRECT APPROPRIATION FROM THE STATE
GENERAL FUND.
T-7 MINNESOTA POST RET'. RFMENT INVESTNr..,T FUND
THE AMM SUPPORTS THE CONTINUATION OF THE MINNESOTA POST
RETIREMENT INVESTMENT FUND AS A MEADS OF PROVIDING
POST -RETIREMENT INCREASES IN THE ;": BENEFITS OF RETIREES
UNDER THE STATE-WIDE PENSION FUN HE AMM SUPPORTc STATE
FUNDING OF ANY FUND DEFICITS FROM 11, FUNDS OR AMORTIZATION
OF THE DEFICITS BY CREDITING A RE'a -ABLE PORTION OF EXCESS
EARNINGS OVER STATUTORY ASSUMPTIONS TO RETIRE DEFICITS AND
PAYMENT OF THE REMAINDER OF EXCESS EARNINGS TO RETIREES AS A COST
OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT WITHOUT ESTABLISHMENT OF ANY GUARANTEED'-'iT141
ADJUSTMENT.
T-8 PENSION FUND PRGGRAM
SINCE INTEGRATION OF PENSION FUND ADM:N13TRAT1ON MECHANISMS MAY
LEAD TO COMBINING THE FUNDS, THE: AMM OPPOSES ANY MOVE TO COMBINE
ADMINISTRATION OF THE THREE STATE-WIDE PENSION PhOGRAMS.
T-9 INSURANCE REBATE
The PERA police and fire fund is now essentially fully funde".
Furthermore, the Employer (taxpayers) through payment of mc,re
than 50 percent of contributions to this fund is creiting a
surp'Aus no' needie-d for Pension purpo:;en. There fora,
THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD AMEND THE PRESENT PROVISION ON
DISBURSEMENT OF THE TWO PERCENT TrkY ON AUTOMOBILE CASUALTY
INSURANCE TO ALLOW EXPENDITURES BY THE RECIPIENT POLITICAL
SUBDIVISION OF ANY EXCESS OVER THE cMpi.OYER'S SHARE OF POLICE
RETIREMENT COSTS FOR ANY POLICE DEPARTMENT PURPOSE INSTEAD OF
REQUIRING PAYMENT TO THE PERA POLICE AND FIRE FUND. SINCE THE
PERA POLICE AND FIRE FUND HAS NCGW ESSENTIALLY ACHIEVED FULL
FUNDING, EMPLOYER' AND EMPLOYF.F.S' CON —'-RT'TTONS SHOULD BE REDUCED
TO AN AMOUNT SUFFICIENT TO PAY NORMAL COSTS C'; AN EQUAL SHARE
BASIS.
,10 CONTRIBUTION SAVING-3
ANY DECREASE IN CONTRIBUTIONS BY LOCAL UNITS DUE TO DEFICIT
REDUCTIONS OR PROGRAM CHANGES SHOULD ACCRUE TO THE LOCAL UNIT.
T-11 STATE TAXATION OF PERA CONTRIBUTIONS
:recently, the Internal Rcvcnue Service ruled that employee
contributions to PERA and similar public pension systems are not
subject to federal income tax contribution during the year in
which they are contributed to the system, but rather are taxable
in the year in which the employee actually receives the benefit.
.his ruling is consistent with the manner in which municipal
emplcyer contributions are taxed. Since the employee does not
'%ave use of the contribution in the year it is made and the
Federal government has deferred taxation until the benefits are
received,
THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE TO DEFER STATE TAXATION OF
EMPLOYEE PERA CONTRIBUTIONS UNTIL BENEFITS ARE RECEIVED AND TO
EXCLUDE 71;- PERA AMOUNT FROM THE EMPLOYEES GROSS INCOME.
T-12 PEhk BOARD AND DIRECTOR SELECTION PROCESS
THE SELECTION PROCESS FOR THE PERA BOARD SHOULD BE .•.AUISED TO
PREVENT DOMINATION BY A SINGLE WELL FINANCED INDIVIDUAL OR
ORGANIZATION. SELECTION OF A SUCCESSOR TO TiiE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
SHOULD OCCUR ONLY AFTER AN OPEN SEI.ECTIOy PROCESS TO CHOOSE THE
BEST QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL IS COMPLETED. FURTHER, THE. STATUTES
SHOULD SPECIFICALLY PROVIDE CRITERIA AND QUALIFICATIONS FOR
INDIVIDUALS TO SERVE AS BOARD MEMBERS AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.
T-13 MERGING OF LOCAL POLICE AND FIRE INTO PERA
POLICE AND FIRE. ASSOCIATIONS SHOULD BE MERGED INTO THE PERA
POLICE AND FIRE FUNDS ONLY IF A NEW DIRECTOR IS SELECTED ON A
FAIR,OPEN BASIS, AND ONLY IF THE CITIES AND ASSOCIATIONS SEEK/
NG
EACH MERGER PROVIDES THE PE JLICE AND FIRE FUND WITH CASE OR
PAYMENT PLANS INCLUDING RE:A111_,, iC INTEREST TO COVER THE F'JL:.
ACTUARIAL. COST OF THE PENSIONS PURCHASED. FURTHER, NO INCREASE
IN BENEFITS TO PERA POLICE AND FIRE MEMBERS SHOULD BE GRANTED
SINCE PERA BENEFITS ARE OBVIOUSLY MORE ATTRACTIVE: THAN THOSE OF
THE LOCAL RELIEF ASSOCIATION.
T-14 PERA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR SALARY
THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD PROHIBIT THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FROM
RECEIVING AN ADDITIONAL SALARY FROM A PERA CONBRIBUTING
ORGANIZATION TO PREVENT CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
II-U TORT LIABILITY LIMITS
During the 1983 legislative session, Tort liability limits for
local governments were increased from $100,000/$300,000 to
$200,000/$6CO,000 as of August 1, 1984. Limits for Hazardous
Waste disposal claims are $300,000/$600,000 and will be
$400,000/$1,200,000 effective August 1, 1984. During these
discussions, the Governors office expressed a desire to remove
Tort liability limits altogether. If done, this could have a
critical and disasterous effect on city financing and property
taxes. The cost of providing insurance for unlimited liability
would be prohibitive and cause a long term unnecessary major
property tax increase. Also, if a major claim were to be filed
and supported through the judicial system for a sum far in excess
of what might be considered reasonable, a local jurisdiction
could literally be driv• , to financial ruin with the taxpayers
becoming liable for huge property tax payments. Unlike a private
sector business, a city cannot merely declare bankruptcy and
cease to exist.
THE AMM CONSIDERS THE CURRENT TORT LIABILITY LIMITS ADEQJATE TO
SATISFY ANY REASONABLE CLAIM AND THEREFORE URGES THE LEGISLATURE
TO RETAIN THE LIMITS IN CURRENT LAW AND NOT CONSIDER UNLIMITED
LIABILITY.
II-V EMPLOYEE TIME/DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS
Ti,e 1984 Legislature eliminated the authority of outstate cities,
as it previously had done f r metropolitan area cities to be
able to require employees to reside within the city boundary.
Howe'ver, in allowing outstate cities the authority to establish
job related time or distance requirements the legislature riemoved
that authority in the metropolitan area, Therefore;
THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO RESTORE THE AUTHORITY FOR
METROPOLITAN AREA CITIES TO SET JOB RELATED TIME OR DISTANCE
RESIDENCY REQ"uIREMENTS FOR CI'PY EMPLOYEES.
III
HOUSING IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA
HOUSING PROBLEM DEFINITION
Housing is a metropolitan problem of major proportiono.
According to demographic data compiled by the Metropolitan
Council, there is an estimated need for about 120,000 new
housing units in the metropolitan area by 1995. A significant
portion of these units (68,OOO) are needed for persons who
cannot afford market rate housing. There are strong
indications that under existing conditions, the total need for
housing or the need of the lower income segment will not be
met. In addition, there is an equally important
problem of maintaining and re -using the existing
housing stock effectively. Otherwise, more new housing
will have to be produced to make up for unnecessary losses and
there will be an under utilization of public service
investments.
The Federal and State Governments appear to be reducing their
financial commitments to provide housing for low and moderate
income persons and this will intensify the housing shortage
problem for those unable to purchase or rent at market rates.
It is also apparent that local units of government do not have
the financial capability to assume the shortfall in Federal and
State provided subsidies. The i.ousing shortage problem for
persons unable to afford market rate housing can only be sc •red
if all levels of governr*,ent and the private sector work
together and if each contribute,; a `'air share to the solution.
Each level of Zovernment sho,41d contribute its fair share to
help solve the problem and each level's contributions should be
of the kind it is best suited to make. The Federal and State
Levels should continue to provide most of the direct subsidies
for low and moderate income persons. The Federal and State
Governments also have the responsibility to improve the overall
investment climate and to provide a tax climate in which the
private sector can produce rental units that are affordable to
low and moderate income households. The State should also
grant:: Local units of government the authority and f•1exiJ>iiity
to Conduct the kind of housing programs that best meeV5.their
diverse needs.
The Metropolitan Council should develop a realistic
comprehensive housing plan for the Metropolitan Area that
provides specific guidance to the public and private sectors so
that both can make rational decisions relative to future
housing needs; a plan which delineates the responsibilities of
all the "actors" in a complex housing delivery system.
Local units of Government also have a strong role to play.
Even though local land use controls constitute a small portion
of the total cost of hourin6, local units should 1t set
requirements which go beyond wl,at is necessary for the
3'-
protection of health, safety and welfare. Local units should
also work with the private sector to make the best use of
existing tools (revenue bonds, tax increment financing, etc.)
to produce housing which is more affordable.
Finally, decision makers at all levels of government must
become more cognizant of their actions, policies, and decisions
which have an indirect but substantial impact on housing costs.
Such actions, policies, and decisions may in
themselves be worthwhile and beneficial but which do drive
up the cost of housing.
BASED ON THE HOUSING PROBLEM DEFINITION, THE AMM RECOMMENDS
THAT:
III -A EXAMINE LOCAL REQUIREMENTS
Local requirements constitute a very small portion of the total
cost of producing housing, but all participants in the housing
delivery system need to do their part to hold costs dowr.
COMMUNITIES EXAMINE THEIR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS (LAND USE
REGULATIONS, SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES, ETC.) TO SEE IF THESE
REQUIREMENTS GO BEYOND WHAT IS NECESSARY FOR THE PROTECTION OF
HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE, AND INHIBIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF
BASIC SHELTER AFFORDABLE HOUSING. MODIFICATIONS SHOULD BE MADE
WHEN APPROPRIATE.
III-B MANDATORY STANDARDS AND ALTERNATIVE HOUSING
Mandatory, uniform land use standards for housing style and
location would not be appropriate because of the great
diversity among cities and differences within cities relative
to state of development, topography, lot and dwelling sizes,
the mix of housing values and costs, and the level of municipal
service:, which are provided. Therefore, cities should retain
the auLbority to regulate land uses, including...1-he
determination as to whether alternative housing, suctl its
manufactured and accessory housing can be located in areas
where other modes of housing have been established.
Land use regulation is one of the tools city off.icials need to
protect the health, safety, welfare, and interests of the
city's residents.
THE LEGISLATURE NOT PASS LEGISLATION WHICH SETS MANDATORY
ZONING AND SUBDIVISION STANDARDS OR WHICH REMOVES LAND USE
REGULATION AUTHORITY FROM LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERNMENT. CITIES
SHOULD RETAIN THE AUTHORITY TO REGULATE THE LOCATION, SIZE
AMOUNT, AND TYPE OF HOUSING, INCLUDING MANUFACTURED AND
ACCESSORY HOUSING, WITHIN THEIR BOUNDARIES.
III-C PROGRAM LATITUDE
There is a tendency on the part of the Legislature when it
provides funding to the Minnesota Dousing Finance Agency (MHFA)
or political subdivisions for housing programs to make sure it
is a safe investment. The AMM does not disagree with the need
to be prudent with public funding. However, the :state
guidelines and regulations sometimes are so stringent they
Inhibit inovation and render the programs inoperable. Also, at
times the rules and regulations for programs administered
locally, are more stringent and cumbersome than for similar
programs administered through the MHFA. There is a need for
creative and inovative programs to increase the production of
housing for low and moderate income persons.
THE LEGISLATURE WHEN PROVIDING FUNDING FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
INOVATIVE AND CREATIVE PROGRAMS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF HOUSING
FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME PERSONS SHOULD PROVIDE ENOUGH
PROGRAM LATITUDE IN THE GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS SO THAT THE
PROGRAMS CAN BE TAILORED TO MEET THE NEEDS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF
A VARIETY OF SITUATIONS IN DIFFERING LOCALS. ALSO THE
STATE GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS SHOULD NOT BE MORE
STRINGENT FOR PROGRAMS ADMINISTERED B: LOCAL UNITS AS OPPOSED
TO PROGRAMS ADMINISTERED THROUGH STATE OR REGIONAL AGENCIES.
III-D RENEWAL OF FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING
The Federal and State levels of government have a broader and
more diverse tax base than local units of government and shoul-'
provide the necessary funding to fulfill their housing polio
commitments to lower income persons. This funding commitme►.
is needed to provide adequate housing for those persons unable
to afford market rate housing.
FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING FOR HOUSING SHOULD BE INCREASED TO
IMPLEMENT THE HOUSI,:; POLICIES OF THOSE LEVELS AND MATCH THE
NEEDS OF THOSE PERSONS. REQUIRING ASSISTED HOUSING INCLUDING
ASSISTANCE rOR REODVATING AND REHABILITATING SUBSTANDARD:.
HOUSING UNITS.
III-E AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR LOCAL HOUSING PROGRAMS
There is a great diversity amonC the cities in the metropolitan
area. Some cities need more: housing for low and moderate
income persons while other citic:, need more housing for middle
and upper income per.;ons. Citie!c, should have the authority to
promote whichever kind of housing is within the public purpose
and best interest of the city to do so. It is also importan!
that state and federal agencies cooperate with cities in
aeveloping workable programs to meet the d ver::e need, of
cities. Cities need to have more control over the cost of
housing being developed if they are to meet the intent of
the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. In a practical sense,
municipalities, may be able to require reduced cost housing,
but it is preferable to have this authority specified by
statute specifically. Dedication would provide land, or cash
in lieu of land, for housing needs and is not intended to
be in addition to parks dedication but a substitute for it if
that would better enable the city to meet its overall needs.
CITIES BE GRANTED SUFFICIENT AUTHORITY AND FLEXIBILITY BY THE
LEGISLATURE TO CONDUCT HOUSING PROGRAMS THAT MEET THE DIFFERING
NEEDS OF DIVERSE CITIES AND THAT ENABLE CITIES TO COMPLY WITH
THE METROPOLITAN LAND PLANNING ACT WHICH DIRECTS CITIES TO
PROVIDE OPPORTUN'.TY FOR LOW AND MODERATE COSTS HOUSING. CITIES
SHOULD BE ALLOWED, IF THEY DESIRE, TO REQUIRE LOWER COSTS
HOUSING IN PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS AND TO REQUIRE THE DEDICATION
OF LAND OR CASH FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING AS AN
ALTERNATIVE TO THE REQUIRED DEDICATION FOR PARKS. ALSO, CITIES
SHOULD HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DEVELOP HOUSING FOR MIDDLE AND
UPPER INCOME PERSONS IF THAT IS NEEDED TO ACHIEVE A BALANCED
HOUSING STOCK.
III-F FINANCING FEDERAL, STATE AND REGIONAL HOUSING POLICIES
7're city services which are provided to residents and property
.wners and financed largely by property taxes do not relate to
the financial ability of the property owners. Property taxes
rrovide the major revenue source for most cities and reduction
:r. property taxes based on ability to pay would compound the
:using problems in most cities.
THE LOCAL PROPERTY TAX SYSTEM SHOULD NOT BE USED AS THE VEHICLE
TO FINANCE OR IMPLEMENT FEDERAL, STATE OR REGIONAL HOUSING
POLICIES.
111•C PRACTICES WHICH INCREASE HOUSING COSTS
Decision makers at various levels of government must become
-ore cognizant of actions the; take which have an indirect but
s.;tstant.al impact on housing costs. These actions in
t-euselves may be worthwhile and beneficial, but when
implemented result in increased housing costs. F.xamrles of
tAis type of action would include such things as the sewer
availability charge, restric,ed growth policies, building and
energy codes, environmental riles, etc.
THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND STATE AGENCIES EXAMINE THEIF
PRACTICES AND POLICIES TO DETz:RMINE POSSIBLE HIDDEN IMPACTS ON
HOUSING COSTS OF SAID PRACTICES AND POLICIES NOT DIRECTLY
RELATED TO HOUSING. CHANCES SHOULD BE MADE AS NECESSARY.
. :4 -
III-H RENTAL HOUSING 1A THE METROPOLITAN AREA
Rental housing plays an important role in the Twin Cities
housing market. Approximately 35 per cent of the housing units -
in the Twin Cities region are rental units. Traditionally,
rental units have provided an affcrdable housing option for,
singles, young adults, young .,parried, students, the elderly,
and low and moderate income -»useholds. In reality, rental
housing units serve a market muc.�: more diverse than that served
by owner occupied units. Yet over the past several years a
number of problems have developed in the rental market,
including:
1. Production, of new rental units has declined drastically as
households are unable to afford the rents which must be
charged to cover costs and financing.
2. Many households which in the past would have moved from
rental to ownership status are unable to do so due to both
the increased cost of housing units and high interest
rates.
3. The combination of few additions to the supply of rental
units, increased competition for rental units, conversion
of rental unit:; to condominiums, increased operating,
costs, and general inflation has created a situation where
many rental units are not an affordable option for low and
moderate income households.
4. The supply of existing rental units, which iS
predominately efficiency and one bedroom units, does not
adequately address the needs of families seeking rental
units.
Precisely becau-se rental housing serves so many diverse types
of households and because the relative size of each category is
changing the solutio„ to t?�vs'elomblems must be multifaceted.
ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT BECOME INVOLVED TO SUCCESSFULLY
ADDRESS THE PROBLEMS IN THE RENTAL MARKET. IN PARTICULAR, THE
STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS HAVE CRUCIAL ROLES IN IMPROVING
THE OVERALL INVESTMENT CLIMATE SO THAT THE PRIVATE SECTOR CAN
PRODUCE: BOTH RENTAL.. AND OWNER OCCUPIED UNITS AND IN PROVIDING
SUBSIDY FUNDS SO THAT LOW AND MODERATE HOUSEHOLDS CAN AFFORD
DECENT RENTAL, UNIT:. POSSIBLE ACTIONS INCLUDE:
- MODIFYING FEDERAL AND STATE TAX POLICIES TO IMPROVE THE
OVERALL INVE:3TME:N.T CLIMATE: FOR THE PRODUC 7 :ON AND
MAINTENANCE OF RENTAL. HOUSING.
CONTINUING AND INCREASING THE LEVEL OF FUNDING AIMED AT
GIVING LOW AND MODERATE INCOME FAMILIES ACCESS TO DECENT
HOUSING.
CONTINUING PROGRAMS WHICH USE TAX EXEMPT BONDING TO CREATE
BELOW MARKET RATE FUNDS FOR BOTH RENTAL AND OWNER OCCUPIED
UNITS.
CONTINUING PROGRAMS WHICH ALLOW REHABILITATION AND
WEATHERIZATION PROGRAMS TO BE UTILIZED ON RENTAL UNITS.
GRANTING LOCAL UNITS MORE AUTHORITY TO REGULATE THE
CONVERSION OF RENTAL UNITS TO CCNDOMINIUMS.
IV
METROPOLITAN AREA ISSUES & CONCERNS
IV. PHILOSOPHY WITH RESPECT TO METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
The source of all governmental power resides with the people. The
purpose of government is to identify and meet the needs of the
governed. Needs of the people should be met with a minimum of
involvement on th-, part of governing units. The degree of
involvement should be that necessary to solve the problem. Because
they are closer to the people, local governing bodies are
generally most :suited to deal with the day-to-day problems of
their constituents, to introduce practical knowledge to the
formation of policies and plans affecting their constituents, and
to see the impact of those policies.
Some issues are beyond the scope of a single governing body.
Therefore, when such issues arise, it is in the interest of all
concerned for governing units to cooperate in reaching a solution.
There are a few problems which are of such magnitude that they
encompass the concerns of an entire metropolitan area. Such
problems and issues must necessarily be dealt with by a
metropolitan unit. However, that unit should act in cooperation
with local governing bodies by attempting to identify the best
solution before determining courses of action. Metropolitan
Agencies and Local Governmental Units should be viewed as partners
with each respecting the role of the other in solving these
problems.
Government must not be insulated from the governed. It crust be
kept in mind by all officials, elected and non-electea, that they
are servants of the will of the people.
IV -A PURPOSE OF METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
Due to the.poiitical fragmentation of this metropolitan aru-1--4R4
the diverse fiscal conditions, geographic locations, and size 4f
the local unit: of government, there is a need for a regional
service delivery system to provide certain services or portions of
certain services to most effectively and efficiently satisfy the
needs of the residents living in this area. F.xamtle of this type
of regional service needs would be the prevention of pollution,
provision of certain transportation functions, etc. There s a
also a need for some planning on a metropolitan wide basis which,
must be done in cooperation with local government. The ffdera1
and state government require that many grant applications be
reviewed by a regional agency to determine consistency .)f these
applications with regional plans and programs. since this
activity is beyoc;d the control of local units of government, the
Council appear- to be the mo.,t logical agency to perforr, this,
function.
THE PRIMARY AND PREDOMINATE. PURPOSES OF THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
AND METROPOLITAN COMMISSIONS SHOULD BE TO COORDINATE THE PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE METROPOLITAN AREA: TO PROVIDE: WITHOUT
NZEDLESS DUPLICATION THOSE AREA WIDE SERVICES WHICH ARE BEYOND THE
CAPABILITY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL UNITS TO PROVIDE INDIVIDUALLY AND
JOINTLY: TO PROVIDE AREA WIDE PLANNING WHERE NECESSARY WITH
COOPERATION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL UNITS: AND TO FULFILL THE
REGIONAL REVIEW RESPONSIBILITIES FOR GRANTS AND LOANS AS DIRECTED
BY THE STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS.
IV-B CRITERIA FOR EXTENSION OF METROPOLITAN ORGANIZATION POWERS
::sere is a natural tendency of any organization to seek more
authority in both breadth and depth; therefore, increased
authority to the Council and its aiencie3 should contain carefully
considered specific direction.
ACTIVITIES WHICH ARE NOT MANDATED BY FEDERAL OR STATE GOVERNMENT
BUT MAY BE UNDERTAKEN THROUGH USE OF GRANT MONEY SHOULD NOT BE
PURSUED MERELY BECAUSE MOINEY IS AVAIL•ABLF UNLESS THERE IS A NEED
THAT MUST BE SATISFIED FOR THE PEOPLE OF THE METROPOLITAN AREA AND
THEN SHOULD BE PURSUED ONLY AFTER A THOROUGH EVALUATION TO
DETERMINE WHAT ADDITIONAL LOCAL OR STATE EXPENDITURES ARE
NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE ACTIVITY, hEACT TO THE FINDINGS OR
IMP:.EMENT A PROGRAM.
THE LEGiSLAT'JRE, IN GRANTING THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ADDITIONAL
AUTHORITY TO UNDERTAKE AN ACTIVITY, SHOULD SPECIFICALLY STATE THE
AUTHORITY BEING GRANTED AND NOT INCLUDE GENERAL LEGISLATIVE
..ANGUAGE SUCH AS..."INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SUCH MATTERS
AS..."
ANY EXPANSION OR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ONLY
WHEN AT LEAST ONE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS EXISTS:
-THE SERVICE;, FUNCTIOX, . OR ACTIVITY EAS BEEN SHOWN TO BE NEEDED
AND IT CAN BE DEMO�N3TRAT£D THAT IT CANNOT BE EFFE`TIVELY OR
EFFICiENT;.Y PROVIDED OR ADMINISTEREi THROUGH EXISTING GENERAL
?URPOSE UN'.TS OF GOVERNMENT.
-INTERVENTION ON A REGIONAL BASIS 1S NEEDED FOR PROTECTION OF THE
REGIONAL INVESTMENT IN THE METROPOLITAN PHYSICAL SERVICE SYSTEM.
-THE SERVICE FUNCTION JR ACTIVITY IS MANDATED BY THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT.
:'J-C STRUCTURES, PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND FUNDING OF
METROPOLITAN SEEVIC,ES AND PROGRAMS
Tre Metropolitan wr,• , ,, ,L. _ i t;� <. ►,e >,
' ^y tt i :'at�rc
1967 to coordinate "the planning and development" of the
Metropolitan Area. The Council, as initially established, was
mostly advisory but was given some direct authority and
responsibility for regional policy development and coordination
in the areas of wastewater treatment and disposal, transportation
and airports. The Council was given limited approval authority
for development proposals which were of metropolitan (regional)
significance. The Council, in its infancy, was given no direct
operational authority and instead the Legislature created two new
Metropolitan Commissions (MWCC and MTC) and restructured the MAC
to actually operate and provide those services. In subsequent
sessions, the Metropolitan Council's authority and responsibility
was expanded to include regional parks and open space, solid
waste, regional review authority over certain types of federal
grant applications, approval authority over controlled access
highways and approval authority over certain elements
(airports, transportation, parks and open space, and sewers) -f
local comprehensive plans. however, the Council was not given
operational or implementation authority in these areas. There
was one expeption to this general division of responsibility: the
Council was given regional HRA operational authority but the
Council can only operate this; authority in a city at the request
of that city.
The funding for the Metropolitan Council and the regional
agencies has also evolved over the period of time and is a
mixture of property taxes, user fees and state and federal
grants. Except for user fees, the Legislature has retained
control over the maximum tax rates and the metro agencies cannot
adjust these rates upward. The Legislature also retains control
over grants thru its biennial appropriation process.
C-1 POLICY PLANNING - POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
The historic legislative intent concerning separation of
responsibility for mett*lipolitan (regional) policy planning and
policy implementation lthuld be reAffirmed.
THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SHOULD BE A PLANNING AND COORDINATING
BODY; AND REGIONAL PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATIONS SHOULD
BE CARRIED OUT THROUGH THE EXISTING METROPOLITAN AGENCIES AND/OR
GENERAL PURPOSE UNITS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT.
C-2 METROPOLITAN STRUCTURE AND STRUCTURAL RELATIONSHIPS
The structure of Metropolitan Governance that ha-- evolved over
the last 16 years is basically satisfactory. The structure and
relationships between the Metropolitan Council and the various
Metropolitan Commission.; and Agencies are not uniform an
function determines form. Ma,or• :J.ructural changes are not needed
but the AMM doe, recommend two minor but significant changes
which should help to promote more effective communication and
coordination of regional services.
-THE CHAIRPERSONS OF THE REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD AND THE
M,E:ROPO;.ITAN WASTE. CONTROL COMMISSION SHOULD BE APPOINTED BY
THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL RATHER THAN THE GOVERNOR.
THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO REVIEW THE ANNUAL
OPERATING BUDGETS OF THE RTB AND MWCC AND TO PROVIDE COMMENTS
WITH RESPECT TO THE: RESPONSIVENESS OF THESE BUDGETS TO THE
REGIONAL POLICY PLANS kDOPTED BY THE COUNCIL FOR THOSE
FUNCTIONS.
C-3 FUNDING FOR REGIONALLY PROVIDED SERVICES
Based on the recently completed study by the Metropolitan Council
of the financing and financial status of the regional commissions
and projected revenues available to proviL regional services;
..,e existing sources of revenues (user fees, state and federal
appropriations and property taxes) are adequate.
THE AMM WOULD OPPOSE THE IMPOSITION OF A SINGLE UNIFORM, REVENUE
SOJRCE TO FUND REGIONAL SERVICES.
-; REGIONAL TAX RATES AND USER FEES.
e Legislature controls the maximum tax ra`
can be
-evied by the Metropolitan Council and the of
tropolitar.
.gencies to fund their programs and services.
lieve it
should continue to do so. User, fees are generally
-olled by
the ,Metropolitan Agency collecting the fees (MAC.
-1nd MTC)
tit the legislature has on occasion imposed certa..,
fee: for
tie MTC. The setting of user fee, and the process
,r setting
fees has generally not been considered a problem by local
.fficials except for the user fees controlled by the MWCC. A
major inter:ial management study and audit is currently
being
cond��'r� of the MWCC and this may provide useful
information
re.L.,.,.e to that agency. Based on the foregoing, the
AMM b- Neves
t .at:
USER FEES FOR REG:�',,.,,L SERVICES SHOULD NOT BE DETERM'NED " Y
THE LEGIS;.A,URE. THE MAXIMUM PROPERTY TAX RATES FOii RE ,IONA
PROVIDED SERVICES SHOULD BE DETERMINED BY THE LEGISLATURE.THE
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE MWCC SHOULD STUDY
AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS WITH RESPECT TO AN IMPROVED PROCESS FOR
DETERMINING WASTE WATER TREATMENT FETES CHARGED BY THE MWCC.
THE STUDY AND RECOMMENDATION SHOULD AS A MINIMUM, INCLUDE SUCH
I':EkS AS: A VEHICLE FOR A CITY TO CHALLENGE THE AMOUNT CHARGE
T'; A CITY IN A TIME..Y FASHION; ,AN APPEAL PROCESS; THE NEED FOUR
SAKE AGE.N�Y TO REGULATE: THE TREATMENT RATES; AND IF THERE IS A
NEED; THE MOST APPROPRIATE. REGULATORY AGENCY. THE METROPOLITAN
COUNCIL SHOULD AL:IO STUDY AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS WITH RESPECT
TO THE APPROPRIATNESS OF USER FEES FOR SPECIAL USE TYPE
FACILITIES WITHIN THE REGIONAL. PARK SYSTEM.
IV-D ME:TROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE ACCOUNTABILITY
The major recommendation o;' the Legislative Cc ,ission on
Metropolitan Governance dealt with the issue of accountability of
Metropolitan Agencies in order to improve their responsiveness to
the various groups and government agencies interested in
Metropolitan Governance. The AMM and other interest groups have
also studied this issue and identified the lack of accountability
as a ii, r problem.
D-1 LEGISLATIVE ACCOUNTABILITY
The system of regional governance should be more accountable to
the Legislat—e. The Metropolitan Council is in reality only
ancountable J reopons:ve to the Governor who is elected on a
state-wide t� S. The Council, in turn, appoints the members of
the RTB, MWCC and MPOSC. Consequently, these Agencies are further
removed from the Legislature in terms of accountability. History
has shown that by and large the Council and Regional Agencies
members are arpointed, reappointed or removed mostly on the basis
of political party affiliation. In theory, the Counci: and
Commission: are also accountable to the Legislature, but the
Legislature in recent years has shown little inclination to
exercise its overview authority unless the Council or Agencies
request increased funding or new funding authority.
A,: BUDGET AND REVENUE FO''E:CASTING OVERSIGHT
THE: LEGISLATURE SHOULD JIRE THE COUNCIL AND REGIONAL AGENCIES
TO PHEPARE LONG RANGE BUDG:.T iROJECTIONS, IN ADDITION TO THE
E!ISTING REQUIREMENT OF ANNUAI. OPFRATING AND FIVE YEAR CAPITA4mhh.
IMPROVEMENT BUDGETS.,- THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WOULD ASSEMBLE M :..
INTEGRATE THE SEPARATE AGENCY BUDGETS INTO A SINGLE BUDGET ---
DOCUMENT AND PREPARE SUMMARY AND OVERVIEW DOCUMENTS SHOWING
AGGREGATE RESULTS AND MAKE; A REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE AND PUBLIC.
THE: COUNCIL WOULD NOT BE GRANTED ANY APPROVAL AUTHORITY BEYOND
WHAT IT NOW P03SESSES .
B) POLICY AND PROGRAM OVERSIGHT
THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD REQUIRE: THE: METROPOLITAN COUNCI�, AND
REGIONAL AGENCIES TO MAKE. A FORMAT. REPORT AT THE BEGINN.NG OF EACH
LEGISLATIVE SESSION WHICH FOCUSES ON THE: MAJOR PROGRAMS, PLANS,
ISSUES AND CONCERNS OF THE: RESPECTIVE AGENCIES. THE REPORTS AS A
MIN,MUM Wn;1..D IDENTIFY AND COMMENT ON NEW PROGRAMS; MAJOR CHANGES
To ON-GOI: PRO ;RAMS; THE: NEED FOR SAME; MAJOR AC('OMPL,I°HMENT I
SINC- TH`.: PREi IOU'S REPORT; AND DISCUSS REASONS FOR INCREASES IN
US'' :ES WF i' SUCK' TNCREASES EXCEED "AE INFLATION RATE:. THE
LEG. ,AnRE SA D HOLD 'HEARINGS' ON F .iCH REPORTS AND ALLOW FOR
PUBL.0 COMMENT.
C) LEGIS!,ATIVE FOCUS
THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD ESTABLISH A CENTRAL P'''NT OF FOCUS WITHIN
THE. LEGISLATIVE STRUCTURE TO ENHAN%,E INCREASED ACCOUNTABILITY AND
OVERSIGHT. THE PREFERRED METHOD WOULD BE TO ESTABLISH STANDING
COMMITTEES IN BOTH HOUSES WHICH FOCUS ON METROPOLITAN AFFAIRS AND
ISSUES AND CONCERNS OF METROPOLITA.-N GOVERNANCE. ALL PROPOSED
,E��ISLATION PERTAINING TO THE AGENCIES OF METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE
WOULD BE REVIEWED IN THESE COMMITTEES IN ADDITION TO THE NEW
ACTIVITIES SUGGESTED IN IV-D-1.
D-2 PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY
Tne Association also believes that the metropolitan agencies
should be more accountable to the residents served by zuch
agencies. :;rest election of agency members might improve
accountability brat it would probably resii'. t in a genera: purpose
metropolitan level of government which ,e AM,'-'. opposes. ii.e AM,M
relieves tr...`. a revised appci.ctmf-nt pi ocess is necessary to
e-...;.r,ce i _+: "c ac ountab i 1 i ty and re _ to the res:eats
ant local officials in the metropolitn:. urea.
.HE LEGISLATURE. S'f011Lp I,IPROVE TuC APPOINTMENT PROCESS FOR
MEMBERS OF THE MEi '•'OPOLITAN COUNCIL AND ThE MWCC, RTB AND MF'OSC.
Th- APPCi:;TMFNT F:+i10ESS, AS A MINIMUM, SHOD'..D INCLUDE: A
REQUIREMF •" FOR A SPECIFIED FI1. 1NG PERI('D FOR FACH VACANCY;
REQUIREvE FOR AN ADEQU*TE:.Y NOTICE^ tI:-I"LIC HEARING IN EA'.
D:STRli "' F0 WHICH AN APPOINTMP'�'T IS 'r) BE MADE INCLUD''
v^.ITEFA FO-y SELECTION, C4NUIDATE DAMES AND QUALIFICATIONS.
QUIRMENT THAT 0 LY PF'°SANS WH- HAVE 'ILED DiT';hE FIL1..
:7KIOD ARE E'.I6IBLE iV„ APPOINiMENT; .ND aU,RF.MENT Fi,:.
%bi1NGFUL INVOLVEMENT -8R'�: LOCAL OFF lr ,,A1.:i AND ,..,GIJi.ATORS FROM
JISTRICT TN WHICH THE APPOTNTMENT IS TO BE MADE. LOCAL
.-FICIALS ::HO;,_D NOT BE PRECL'ID::.` In*" SERVING oN THE ,ZTh,;PO' ITAN
COUNCIL.
D•3 UNIFORM,, ADMI`iISTRATIVE PPO ; DURES - MF,;ROPOL.ITAN AGENCIES
ne Governs: ' Comm sn i o,, rev iew t► MWCC 'fade sever,_
rccommendationc, iith administrative type prorlem;.
a!sociated wit`; the M'wi (_ is possible that jome of these
;.roblems may also lie intersnt ir. tt,e other metropolitan type
agencie3 These zencie. ill hive one `teas in common their
b,:werni.ng bodies:, ... :a seIs.,teda L.) appointment and are not directly
I- ..i...Cly to the resi d- rAn cf the metropolitan area. Uniform
n13tra• ive • rocedurc .. c,oi.c ur•r.irig : ,ch thin,.:s as personne:
practices, nepotism, procedures for awarding contracts, a code of
ethics, etc. should be developed and implew, ted.
THE AMM WOULD SUPPOPT LEA` SLATION WHICH RESULTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT
AND IMPLEMENTATION Or UN.dORM ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR THE
METROPOLITAN AGENCIES (METROPOLITAN COUNCIL, MWCC, RTB, MTC). AN
ADEQUATF!.Y NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING SHOULD BE HELD PRIOR TO FINAL
ADOPTION OF THE UNIFORM PROCEDURES.
D-4 LOCAL - REGIONAL CONFLICT RESOLUTION MECHANISM
One of the issues addressed by the Legislative Commission on
Metropolitan Governance in its final report relates to thc. need
for a mechanisrw whereby intergovernmental disputes in the
metropolitan area can be resolved.
Three governmental alternatives for dispute resolution; were
considered: ;1) judical review; (2) adminiretrative procedure;
and (3) legislative review. Persuaded that court proceedings are
not the best means of settling mo-+ intergovernrrpntal disputes,
the Commis— on focused most +' its tentior; upon the other two
alternative... With regard 'mi trative proceedings, either
of the rule -making or co: i case variety, the Commission
concluded that they are etter suitec, o the :.eeds of
governmental adversaries tha.. .ourtroom procee"ings. Reasoning
that Administrative Procedures Act kAPA) proceedings are not
generally appropriate to the types of functic^-� performed by
metropolitan agencies, the Commission con;_,ided tho: the
Legislature should apply the APA process only on a case-b;,-case
basis after careful consideration.
The Comp-i.ssion concluded that the third forum, the Legislature, is
the orp r should be relied upon and that the ?.ef ' la' ure shout 1
cnn...'der means of improving, legitimitizing an,, ggularizing
ac:cc.;s to t, legislative forum for dispute h:ch cannot
Q^,�:)erly be led at the metropolitan level. shis end, the
Ccr-::-Assion incicat.ed its support of proEram evaluaLjjCA as a method
of exposing and resolving the policy issues which give rise to
many such disputes.
THE AMM BELIEVES :'HAT THE LEGIJ LATURE SHOULD NOT INTERVENE IN
MOST METROPOLITAN LEVEL - LOCAL LEVEL DISPUTES, B91" 14�0
RECOMMEND THAT THE L.F:;ISLATURE: ESTABLISH AN ADMINISTRAT IVr- TY,-,E
PROCEDURE BY STATUTE FOR LI:j*PU'iED CASES INVOLVING THE
INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF METROPOLIAN LEVEL POLICIES
IN SPECIFIC SITUATIONS INVO► VING A LOCAL .trNIT Oi r,OVFRNMENT.
IV-E RAPID DEVELOPMENT IN COUNTIES ADJACENT TO THF. METROPOLITAN
APEA
inCreif e f r•t t !'
development activities in the counties adjacent ;,c the
metropolitan area and analysis of this development will likely
reveal the beginning stages of growth problems similar to the
problems which prompted the establishment of the Development
ramework and Mandatory Land Planning Act in the metropolitan
area. In fact, the development in adjacent counties may
accelerate due to the controlled growth policies within the
metropolitan area.
To correct any undersirable growth patterns which may cause the
unnecessary development or expansion of public service systems
such as water, wastewater treatment and transportation facilitis,
etc. in the area, and the negative impact that that de-velopr*.+
may have upon the metropolitan area, the Association recomms-nds
that:
THE LEGISLATURE DESIGNATE A STATE AGENCY TO MONITOR AND ASSESS
UR°AN DEVELOPMENT IN THOSE ADJACENT COUNTIES AND REPORT TO THE
LEGISLATURE AND THE ADMINISTRATION ON THE NEGATIVE IMPACT OF SUCH
URBAN DEVELOPMENT.
THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD PROVIDE THE TOOLS IE�ESSARY TO SOLVE THE
PROBLEM IF THE MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT INDICATES THAT A PROBLEM
EXISTS.
IF THE PROBLEM SOLUTION REQUIRES PUBLIC INVESTMENT, THEN THE COSTS
SHOULD BE BORNE BY THE BENIFITTING AREA INCLUDING SUCH HIDDEN
COSTS AS HIGHER TAXES, UTILITY FEES, TRANSPORTATION, ETC.
E"iTN'THOUGH THE AREA OF CONCERN IS NOT PART OF THE SEVEN COUNTY
METROPOLITAN AREA; DUE TO THE POTENTIAL IMPACT ON METROPOLITAN
AREA, Ti1E METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SHOULD ASSIST AND COORDINATE WITH
THE DES16NATED STATE AGENCY IN THIS EVALUATION.
V-F MINNESOTA INTtiRGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW OF FEDF IL PROG"LM
t J.4
?residential. Executive Order No. 12372 as amc-oded by Executive
�r:er No. 12416 eliminates the Federal A—i Review Process and
a;:thorizes each state to establish its own process. Minnesota
Sessions laws 1983, Charter 289, Section 49 authorized the State
Planning Agency to adopt a state process. Such review and state
processes must be recognized by the Federal Agencies. A State
:rater Governmental Review of Federal Programs process was adopted
,n 1984 and appears to be satisfactory. Any revision to the state
-ocess should be consistent with t`.e principles listed below.
F GUIDELINES FOR STATE PROCESS
STATE PROCESS (PROCEDURES) MU_1T BE APPLICABLE AND CONSISTENT
u'; A STATEWIDE BASIS WITH SPECIFIED CRITERIA TO DETERMINE WHICH
FEDERAL PROGRAMS, PROPOSALS AND PROJECTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE
INTER -GOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS. PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS SHOULD
NOT BE ADDED OR DELETED FROM THE LIST WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE.
F-2 REGIONAL REVIEW AGENCY
THE REGIONAL AGENCIES REVIEW AUTHORITY, SHOULD BE LIMITED TO
JUDGING THE PROGRAMS, PROPOSALS, PROJECTS CONSISTENCY WITH
REGIONAL PLANS, GOALS AND POLICIES. NO PREFERENCE OR PRIORITY
SHOULD BE GIVEN TO PROJECTS, PROGRAMS OR PROPOSALS WHICH EXCEED
THE REGIONAL OR STATE REQUIREMENTS AS OPPOSED TO THOSE PROJECTS,
PROGRAMS OR PROPOSALS WiiICH MEET THE REGIONAL OR STATE
RE QU�.REMENTS. EACH PROGRAM PROJECT PROPOSAL SHOULD BE REVIEWED
PRIMARILY ON ITS OWN MERITS AND THE REGIONAL REVIEWING AGENCY
SHOULD DOCUMENT ITS REASONS FOR CONSIDERING FACTORS NOT DIRECTLY
RELATED TO THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE PROGRAM, PROJECT, PROPOSAL.
F-3 NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
PROCESS, SHOULD BE AS STRINGENT AS THOSE FORMERLY REQUIRED BY
A-95.
IV-G COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING - ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS
Regional, state, and federal governmental levels •equire a variety
of special-purpose and environr;ental review-- for proposed
development projects. Each of these reviews represents a response
to a perceived need or a public concern. Environmental reviews
can cause significant delay which creates uncertainty and
sometimes higher costs tc_ the developer and ultimately the
consumer. The process of environmental -eview can also be abused
frivolously.
Improvements have been made to simplify th:e state environmental
=, review process, administered by the Environmental Quality Board
�- (EQB). In ,97h, the Env ironmenta1 Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was
introduced. To aid in determininr, whether a proposed action has
potential for significant environmental effects that would require
the thorough evaluation of an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS). In most cases, ar, E1:'2 is not required, and the
environmental review process is complete when the EAW is cleared.
A more recent change ha- shifted the responsibility for most F:IS
preparatior, to local units c,' Government. We commend the
Legislature and thf: EQB for ing there positive steps to
simplify and streamline the ronmtntal review process a d
further believe thall another t., would be tc incorporate more
the environmental review process into the lo.-al planning Froces:,.
Each metropolitan area community rcust prepare a comprehensive
1"'an; the local plan is an excellent vehicle for Qu,h are
THE AMM SUPPORTS THE CONCEPT OF ALLuWTNG LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE PLANS
AND ORDINANCES WHICH CONTAIN ACCEPTABLE ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS TO
BE USED TO SATISFY ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ADDRESSED IN THE EAW AND
EIS PROCESS. FURTHER, THE. ENTIRE STATE'S ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY
SYSTEM SHOULD BE STREAMLINED IN SUCH A MANNER TO ENABLE A
"ONE -STOP" PERMIT SYSTEM FOR ALL STATE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.
! -H COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING - LOCAL AND REGIONAL INTERACTION
Im—.1ementation of the legislation passed in 1976 mandating the
completion of local and regional comprehensive plans is nearly
complete. However, it must be recognized that planning is an
ongoing process, and several precepts should be kept in mind by
local units of government, the Metropolitan, Agencies, and the
State as this planning process continues during the 19801s.
YET. ROPOLITAN SYSTEM PLANS, AS WELL AS REGIONAL PLANS FOR THE
PUY."'AL SERVICE SYSTEMS PROVIDING FOR ORDERLY AND MANAGED GR'DW;H,
MAST CONTINUE TO BE SUFFICIENTLY SPECIF'C IN TERMS OF LOCATIONS,
CAPACITIES, AND TIMING TO ALLOW FOR COtiSIDERATION IN LOCAL
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING.
THE REGIONAL INVESTMENT IN METROPOLITAN PHYSICAL SERVICE SYSTEMS
(TRANSPORTATION, WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT, AIRPORTS, AND PARK AND
OPEN SPACE) SHOULD CONTINUE TO BE PROTECTED BY PREVENTING ADVERSE
IMPACT ON THESE SYSTEMS DUE TO LACK OF INTEGRATION BETWEEN
REGIONAL AND ,..00A'- PLANNING.
CA' OFFICIALS MUST HAVE EFFECTIVE INPUT INTO THE REGIONAL
?:.ANNING PROCESS ON AN ONGOING BASIS.
DESIGNATION OF OTHER PLANS AS METROpCOLITAN SYSTEMS PLANS SHOULD
NCT BE MADE UNLESS THERE IS A COM?ELLING METROPOLITAN AREA WIDE
PROBLEM OR CONCERT: THAT CAN ONLY BE SOLVED THROUGH A REGIONAL
SYSTEM.
IV -I REZONING REQUIREMENTS - CITIES OF THE FIRST CLASS
7'-.e State Municipal Planning Act sets forth special reGuir-=ner;ts
for rezoning in Cities or the First Cla:s. Land can be rezone.:
::nly with a. consent petition approved by two-thirds of the
;roperty owners within 100 feet of the property to be rezoned or
ty a "40-acre study". In effect, neighboring property owners have
more power over rezoning than the elected :ity officials. Also,
t^,is causes a problem for the cities of the first class in meeting
the requirements of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act.
THEREFORE THE AMM RECOMMENDS THAT THE MUNICIPAL PLANNING ACT BE
RE'�ISED TC MAKE: THE REQUIREMENTS FOR REZONING IN CITIES OF THE
FIRST CLASS CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENT:, FOR EEZ ONING IN
CITIES OF THE SECOND, THIRD, AND FOURTH CLASS.
IV-J METROPOLITAN COUNCIL BUDGET
The Metropolitan Council has an annual budget of several
million dollars and impacts the two million people living in the
metropolitan area. The resident: have the right to know how
their money is being spent; therefore, the annual budget is a
tremendously important document. It should convey enough
information so that the residents can determine what product is
being produced and how much the product costs. Also the budget
should be 1cepared early enough in the annual adoption process so
that the residents can provide meaningful input as to program
activities and program priorities. The Metropolitan Council has
taken steps to improve its budget process and we commend them for
this. The following suggestions are made to help the Council
upgrade its budget process further.
J-1 BUDGET DETAIL AND SPECIFICITY
As noted, the Annual Budget and Work Program has been improved in
re,-_nt years to contain more detail and specificity which enables
Interest groups to make more reasontd recommendations. Further
improvements should be made.
MANDATED OR NON DISCRETIONARY PROJECTS, PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES
SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED. PROJECTS, PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES WHICH MAY
BE DISCRETIONARY BUT ARE TOTALLY FUNDED BY A FEDERA:, OR STATE
GRANT SHOULD A:.SO BE IDENTIFIED. MORE INFORMATION SHOULD BE
PROVIDED AS TO PREVIOUS YEARS EXPENDITURES FOR ON -GOING PROGRAMS,
PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES.
J POST HEARING BUDGET INCREASE
In at least each of the last two years, the Council has
significantly increaE6ft 4ts budget several months into the budget tr<
year. The AMM belie =this detracts significantly from the fir
official open budge' process and should not tecome an annua:
occurrence.
THE; METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SHOULD REVIEW ITS TOTAL BUDGET PROCESS
SO TEAT IT HAS APPROPRIA:'E FACTUAL INFORMATION AT THE TIME IT
ADOPTS THE ANNUAL FUDGET AND WORK PROGRAM TO PRECLUDE THE: NEED FOR
MAJOR BUDGET AMENDMENTS AFTER INITIAL ADOPTION. IF BUDGET
AMENDMENTS ARE NECESSARY, THE: COUNCIL SHOU:.D ENSURE THAT THE
AMENDMENT PROCESS PROVIDES ADEQUATE: NOTICE TO THE PUB:.IC AND THAT
THE PUBLIC BE PROVIDED THE OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT.
J-3 RELIANCE: Ot� PROPERTY TAXE:;
' 1 • R.If � r • • 1 . � \
to support Council activities. Federal grants used to fund about
two,'thirds of the Council Budget and the local property tax about
one-third. The ratio is now reversed. Property taxes are already
considered to be very high by some persons in the metropolitan
area and maor efforts should be made to hold the line on
.ncreaces.
THE COUNCIL SHOULD MAKE A THOROUGH EXAMINATION OF THE ACTIVITIES
FORMERLY FUNDED. BY FEDERAL GRANTS TO DETERMINE IF THEY ARE STILL
NFZESSARY AND WORTHWHILE WHEN ONLY LOCAL DOLLARS ARE INVOLVED. THE
COUNCIL SHOULD ALSO SEEK TO BE INCLUDED IN IHE STATE. FUNDING
PROGRAM THAT PROVIDES SOME FUNDING FOR THE REGIONAL DEVELUrSEN—A
COMMISSIONS IN RURAL MINNESOTA WHICH PERFORM MANY SIMILAR TASKS.
ADDITIONALLY THE COUNCIL SHOULD SEEK TO DIVEST ITSELF OF SERVICES
THAT IT PERFORMS FOR THIS AREA, IF SUCH SERVICES ARE PERFORMED BY
S':A':E AGENCIES FOR RURAL MINNESOTA.
J-4 CASH RESERVE FUND
Based or, an analysis of the proposed 1985 Metropolitan Council
B,:dgtt Iocument it appears that the cash reserve furl is larger
1—ar, is needed for cash flow purposes. However, since sufficient
information is not contained in the budget document as to cash
flow needs and when income is to be received, it is impossible to
Determine how much reserves are necessary.
'HE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SHCULD SEEK RECOMMENDATIONS FROM I':S
AUDITOR AS TO WHAT THE APPROPRIATE LEVEL OF CASH RESERVES SHOULD
BE. THE COUNCIL SHOULD ALSO SEEK ADVICE AS TO HOW THESE RESERVES
SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED AND ACCOUNTED F' N ITS BUDGET PROCE3S AND
uvC1JMEN7ATION.
IV-K SEWER AVAILABILITY CHARGE (SAC)
^.e charge is levied against all building units within the sewer
service area whether or not these units will connect to a
metropolita►. ;ewer facility. Sewer service area boundaries
basically fo:_,jw municipal boundaries when some portion of a city
is connected to a sewer facility. The Development Framework
established a Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) line
different from and in many cases, inside the sewer service area
boundaries creating the situation where SAC is je•ried against
units which will not be served within the foreseeable planning
future. The current funding boundaries are incons'.stent with
Development Framework policy.
THE AMM BELIEVES THAT A THOROUGH EVALUATION SHOULD BE MADE OF THE
SEWER A� AILABILITY CHARGE (SAC) TO DETERMINE IF IT IS FAIR,
EG1217ABLE AND RELEVANT RECOGNIZING THAT MANY CHANCES HAVE OCCURRED
AND PRESENT CONDITIGNS ARE QUITE DIFFERF'NT THAN THEY WERE IN THE
EARLY 1970'-) WHEN THE SAC k'.-) E:STABLISHE:D. SPECIAL ATTENTION
SHOULD BE GIVEN TO THE SITUATION WHERE THE SEWER SERVICE AREA
BOUNDARY 1S NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE MUSA BOUNDARY. THIS
EVALUATION SHOULD BE COORDINATED AND/OR DIRECTED BY THE
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL.
IV-L METROPOLITAN PARKS ANG OPEN SPACE FUNDING
The 1974 Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Act established the
Metropolitan Parks and Open Space system and provided
state/regional fiscal support for acquisition and development of
the regional park system. Also the Act provided a "payment in lieu
of taxeG" to Local units of government on a decreasing basis over
a four year period. This "payment in lieu cf taxes" was to lessen
the immediate impact of property taken off the tax rolls for
regional park purposes. Funding for the operations and
maintenance of regional parks was and is the responsibility -of
the implementing agencies (counties and cities).
L-i OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
Due to increased usage, a leveling of state aids and the impact of
levy limit restrictions, it is becoming increasingly difficult for
the implementing agencies to operate and maintain these ►^—ional
facilities. Furthermore, regional parks provide the sam( -sin
function in the metropolitan area as state parks pcov..:e it,
outstate Minnesota and State funding is provided for operation and
maintenance of Mate pa-ks.
THE AMM RECOMMENDS THAT STATE OR REGIONAL FUNDS HE PROVIDED TO
IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES TO HELP FUND THE MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION
COSTS FOR THE REGIONAL PARKS AND OPEN SPACE SYSTEM. THE
TA:'F./REGIONAL FUNDS SHOULD BF IN THE FOPw OF A CONTIN�iNG
REVENUE SOURCE: NOT DEPENDENT UPON BIENNIAL LEC"-ATIVE:
APPROPRIATION AND PREFERRABLY FROM A SOURCE OTHER THAN THE
PROPERTY TALI.', A FAIR AND EQUITABLE FORMULA FOR DISTRIBUTIM, OF
THE: STATE/REGIONAL FUNDS SHOULD BE DEVELOPED. THE: REGIONAL PARKS,.
SHOULD REMAIN UNDER THE CONTROL. OF THE IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES.
L-2 FUNDING FOR IMPACTS OF REGIONAL PARKS ON HOST COMMUNITIES
xcept for th+�, four year "payment in lieu of taxes; no provision
was made to mitigate the continuing cost impacts of a regional
park facility on a "host community", when such community is not
the owner of the facility. The cost impacts include such itCms as
increased public safety costs, street and road maintenance, litter
cleanup, permanent loss of tax revenues, etc.
THE AMM RECOMMENDS THAT AS A CONDITION FOR RECEIVINC RECiJNAL OR
STATE: FUNDING FOR A REGIONAL PARK FACILITY, THE FACILI-i'Y OWNER AND
OPERATOh MU:")T 14ECOT7 AN AwREFME:NT W Tf, /NF. MOST COMMUNITY TO
REIMBURSE IT FOR THE COST IMPACTS ON THE HOST COMMUNITY.
IV-M SURFACE WATER
':he Legislature in 1982 adopted a Surface Water Management Act for
the 7-county metropolitan area. The Act as passed and amended in
1334 addressed most of the concern raised by the AMM and we do not
see the need for major new legislation at this point in time. if
the Legislature considers a bill for the balance of the state or
:f changes are contemplated for the metropolitan area, such
:egislation sho;;ld not. diminish emphasis on the following
principles:
T.HE COST TO LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERNMENT FOR PLANNING AND
IMPLEMENTING THIS ACT MUST REMAIN OUTSIDE OF LEVY LIMITS AND
ADDITIONAL MANDATES ?LACED ON LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE
FULLY FUNDED B: STATE RAISED REVENUES. A METROPOLITAN AREA WIDE
AD VALORUM PROPERTY TAX SHOULI: NOT BE ESTABLISHED TO PAY FOR
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT 'PLANNING, PROJECTS, MAINTENANCE) EXCEPT
FOR REGIONA:, PLANNING OR PROJFCTS THAT ARE JUDGED TO BE OF
M.ETFOPOLITAN SIGNIFICANCE PER M.S. 473.173. THE AUTHORITIES ANL
RESPONSIBILITIES ASSIGNED TO THE VARIOUS UNITS AND LEVELS OF
GOVERNMENT BY THE 1982 ,SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT ACT SEEM TO BE IN
GOOD BALANCE AND SHOULD ALLOW FOR EFFECTIVE EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT
OF SURFACE WATER. THESE AUTHORITIES AND REPONSIBILITIFS SHOULD
NOT BE CHANGED UNLESS THE SYSTEM DELINEATED iN THIS ACT PROVES
UNWORKABLE. LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERNMENT WITHIN ThE 7-COUNTY
METROPOLITAN AREA SHOULD BE ELIGIBLE TO PA;'ICIPATE IN ANY
STATE-WIDE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT GRANT PROGRAM WHICH MAY BE
-STAB:,ISHED AS PART OF A STATEWIDE PROGRAM.
IV-N HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT
7ne problem of regulating, controlling and disposing of hazardous
zaterials in an environmentally round manner is one of the major
:ssses of this decade both nationally and locally. Major state
:egislation addressing1Chiz issue was enacted in 1980, 181, 182
anal '83. These legislative acts, responded to the conce-ns and
Issues rai;;ed by the AMIM and we commend the legislature for its
a:tion. The curr,ulative affect of the legislation was the
establishment -.;f an, on -going management and cortrul system for the
handling and d::Gosai of hazardous materials where responsibility
is centralized at the state level but requires the cooperation
and support of all levels of government. The AM;M does not
verceive the need for additional legislation or major changes to
existing legislation at the present time. However, any future
legislation that may be considered should enhance and not diminish
emphasis on they f:111cw1 ne, G:r nci,.le:,:
M-1 EFFECTIVE PLANNING
PARTIES OR ACENCIE.5 WHO GENERATE HAZARDOUS WASTE SHOULD BE
INVOLVED IN ALL PHASES OF PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTING THE MANAGEMENT
AND DISPOSAL SYSTEM.
N-2 ABATEMENT -REDUCTION -RESOURCE RECOVERY
GENERATORS SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED 'r0 MODIFY THEIR PRODUCTION
PROCESSES TO RE: -USE, RECOVER/RECYCLE AS MUCH HAZARDOUS WASTE AS
POSSIBLE AND TO USE LESS HAZARDOUS RAw MATERIALS IN Tf.EIR
MANUF4CTURINr PROCESSES. ENCOURAGEMENT COULD BE GIVEN THRU
INCENTIVES/DISCINCENTIVIF.S.
N-3 HANDLING, STORAGE, DISPOSAL
ALL PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE "HAZARDOUS WASTE STREAM" (FROM
GENERATION TO DISPOSAL) MUST BE REQUIRED TO HANDLE WASTE IN A
MANNER THAT WILL ASSURE THAT THESE WASTES ARE PROPERLY IDENTIFIED,
COLLECTED, TREATED, TRANSPORTED, ETC. AND ULTIMATELY DISPOSED OF
IN A SAFE MANNER.
N-4 PRIVATE OWNERSHIP
THE PRIVATE SECTOR SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED TO OWN, OPERATE AND MA!'AGE
HAZARDOUS WASTE PROr?SSING, TREATMENT, S Oxi,GE AND DISPOSAL
FACILITIES UNDER STRI.GENT STATE REGULATION AND LICENSING AND
BACv,?' BY STATE LIABLL TY. UNDERGROUND OR IN -GROUND BURIAL OF
HA: r,:iDOUS WASTES SHOULD ONLY BE USED AS A '.AST RESORT ANT) IF THIS
BECOMES NECESSARY, THE PRIME CRITERIA FOR SITE SELE.;TION SHOULD
BE GEOLOGICAL ACCEPTABILITY AND SAFETY.
N-5 COMPENSATION -INCENTIVES FOR HOST COMMUNITIES
COMPENSATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED TG HOST COMMUNITIES SIMILAR
COMPENSATION PROVIDED FOR SOLIL WASTE LA`dDFILLS.
N-6 EXISTING SITE CLEAN-UP AND LIABILITY
THE MPCA SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED TO PROCEED POST HASTE TO CLEAN-UP
AND DF.CONT!"MINATE THE F.XISTItir, HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES BEFORE THERE
IS FURTHER DAMAGE: TO PUBLIC, .iL.A!,7H AND THE ENVIRONMENT. IF A
RESPONSIBLE: PARTY CAN BE IDENTIFIED, THAT PARTY SHOULD BE LIABLE
FOR CLF,AN-UP COSTS AND PERSONAL INJURY DAMAGES AS DEFINED IN LAW.
iF A RESPONSIBLE PARTY CANNOT BE IDENTIFIED, THEN THE CLEAN-UP
SHOULD BE FINANCED BY THE. STATE SUPERFUND AND THE LEGISLAT.UhE
SHOULD ASSURE THAT THc RE ARE ADEQUATE FUNDS TO DO SUCH CLEAN-UP.
IV-0 SOLID WASTE: MANAGEMENT 'IN THF. METROPOLITAN AREA
The 4aste Management Act of 1980 and ar. amended by the Legislature
in lJ31, 1982, 193; and 1984 r.larifi- ►ikll rederineu the roles
.-esponsibiJ.ities of various level:, government with re3peCt to
managing the solid waste stream within the 7-county metropolitan
area. The solid waste system in place in the 7-county area is
basically a three -tiered system whereby cities control and
regulate collection; counties are responsible for 'siting' new
landfills, developing abatement plans and regulating existing
landfills; an the Metropolitan Council has regional planning and
coordinating responsibilities. The system was intended to foster
and encourage abatement, recycling and resource recovery for as
mnuch of the waste stream as possitle and 'hen to assure
environmentally sound landfill disposal for t; rema'.ning solid
waste. Maximum cooperation and coordination amo..g and between the
various levels and units of government and thr private sector is
needed if the system is to work as intended. The system has not
been entirely implemented as yet, but it appears to be workinb
although there is a growing concern that not enough attention and
emphasis has been given to abatement, rem ling, z-d resource
recovery type activities.
0-1. ALTERNATIVES TO LANDFILLS
All levels and units of government and the private sector should
;.anticipate and cooperate in planning and managing the solid waste
strehm to assure a cost effi:,ient and environmentally sound solid
waste disposal system. Landfilling should only be used as a last
resort and then only for "processed" solid waste or for those
materials which can not be r,-,cled, reused, or disposed of in
another manner
THE AMM STRuNGLY ENDORSES ABATEMENT, RECYCLING AND RESOURCE
RECOVERY ACTIVITIES AND PROGRAMS TO REDUCE THE NEED FOR IN -GROUND
'SPOSAL OF UNPR:ICESSED SOLID WASTE. THE AMM WOULD SUPPORT
'NTUAL PROHIBITION OF DISPOSAL OF UNPROCE;SED SOLID WASTE IN
-....DFILLS PROVIDED THAT COST EFFICIENT ALTERNATIVES ARE DEVELOPED
AND FUNDING IS PROVIDED TO CITIES T') IMPLEMENT THEIR ASSIGNED
RESPONSIBILITIE: IN A REVISED SOLID WASTE MANAJEMENT SYSTEM.
J4. COMPENSATION AND INCENTIVES FOR HOST COMMUNITIF�S
slid waste disposal facilities have many undesireable impacts on
+e "host" communities and they should be compensated for all
11rect and indirect costs associated with the unde31reaG'e impacts
s:ch a facility has on the community. Direct costs include such
tr.inZs as fire protection, water and sewer F4,rvices, buffer zone
design and amenities, litter clean-up, etc. indirect costs include
s.-!% items as road ma;:,I,enancc monitoring cost¢, end u.se y: xnni..ig
an: city administrative .osts associated with the facility.
ffective January 1, 19A; the hest communities for :andfilis are
zu.!:orize-i to charge a fee up to 15 cents per cubic: yard as
c -_.-;,ensat iori for these impacts.
THE AMM SCi;ORTS THIS AUTHORIZATI(:!i AND BELIEVES IT SHOULD BE
CONTINUED. AS OTHER MAJOR F :D WASTE PROCESSING FACILITIES GO ON
LINE (S11CH AS INCINERATION , c FACILITIES THE IMPACT OF THESE
FACILITIES ON THE HOST COMMUNITIES SHOULD CAREFULLY MONITORED
TO DETERMINE IF THEY ALSO HAVE SIGNIFICANT UNDESIREABLE IMPACT AS
OPPOSED TO BENEFITS. IF SO, SOME FORM OF COMPENSATION MAY ALSO BE
NECESSARY FOR THOSE COMMUNITIES.
0-3 FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL, PERSONAL AN' DAMAGES
Studies conducted by the Minnesota Pollution Cow ,1 Agency (MPCA)
and the Minnesota Health Department have indicated that most, :f
not all, landfills in the metropolitan area are causing ground
wattr contamination problems. How significant these problems are
or what the impacts will be is largely undetermined at this point
in time. Effective January 1, 1985 some proceeds from a surtax on
solid waste going into landfills will go into a fund dedicated to
help solve pollution type problems.
THE AMM SUPPORTS THIS SURTAX ':D BELIEVES IT SHOULD BE CONTINUED.
THE PROCEEDS F30F THIS TAX SHOULD PROVIDE HELP TO PERSONS OR
COMMUNITIES IvO.19ED OR DAMAGED BY ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL INCIDENTS
CAUSED BY :.ANDFILL CONTAMINATION. (I.E. REA OR PERSONAL PROPERTY
DAMAGE, PERSONAL INJURIES, :'LEAN -UP ACTIVI'; IES, ALTF - gA.TIVE WATER
SUPPLIES, ETC.). COUNT_GS MUST EXERCISE THt.n STATUTORY
RESPONSIBILITIES TO ASS RE THAT LANDFILLS APE INFILECTED AND
OPE7, ED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND COUNTY REQUIREMENTS.
0-4 COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES
Counties nave the ma„or responsibilities for mar- -inf: and
implementing the solid waste disposal syst.:' . There
feel that the counties have not been as ai�bress ve as they shoa.Ld
have been in decreasing +•his area's reliance on landfills as the
only viable disposal method. has beer some discussion, of
establishing a new metro type organization Lo take over the county
responsibilities. The _unties feel that a lacK of f, f -.: •Ic; is to
blame and effective January 1, 1985 are autt,,)-ized to :t.arge a
surtax of 25 cents per yard of solid waste to help pay for
a1'prnatives to land dizpos,;I.
,'HE AMM SUPPORTS THIS COUNTY SURTAX AUTHORIZATION AND DOES NOT
SUPPORT THE CREATION OF A NEW AGENCY TO ASSUME THE COUNTY SOLID
WASTE MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES. ' tE AMM URr-ES THE COUNTIES TO
RAPIDLY DEVELOP PREFERSED DISPOSAL TECH:IQUEs WHICH ARE
ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND AND COST EFFICIENT. CITIES ShG1JLD t, _`?ERATE
Wlri THE COUNTIES TN DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING NREFERR£P
DISPOSAL TECHNIQUES AND PROGRAMS (I.E. ABASEMENT, RECYCLING,
INCINERATION FOR ENERGY, COMPOSTING, ETC.).
0-5 TRANSFER STATION AND REGULATIONS
Metropolitan Counties are given the power to acquire by purchase,
lease, gift or condemnation solid waste facilities or properties
which includes transfer stations. Acquisition is permitted
without compliance with local land use ordinances. Metropolitan
cities have no protection, except through a review process, from
improvident designation of transfer station sites.
THE AMM RECOMMENDS THAT THE LEGISLATURE PLACE A MORATORIUM ON
TRANSFER SITE SELECTION UNTIL ADEQUATE AND REASONABLE RF.GULATIuN_
OR RULES HAVE BEEN PROMULGATED BY THE MPCA AND OTHER STATE
AGENCIES WHICH WILL CONSIDER THE SITE WITH RESPECT TO LOCAL_ LAND
USE CONTROLS AND THE PROTECTION OF THE: HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE
OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE AFFECTED CITIES. THE RULES OR REGULATIONS
SHOULD NDT BECOME: EFFECTIVE UNTIL ALL AFFECTED CITIES HAVE HAD THE
OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW SUCH RULES AND TO COMMENT ON THEIR ADEQUACY.
0-6 REGULATION OF DISPO-')A:, RATES
7nrough a variety of conditions and reasons s;;ch as solid waste
districting, government control, regulated collections, and
centralized private ownership of disposal facilities; solid waste
disposal choices might become more non-competitive and
r:cr;opolistic in nature.
.HE AMP, BELIEVES THAT SHOULD SUCH A CONDITION OCCUR, A RATE
REGULATION MECHANISM FOR TIPPING (DROP) CHARGES AND COLLECTION
CHARGES SHOULD BE DEVELOPED BY THE LEGISLA"URE.
0-7 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FEF,S
y.nnesota Stat+:es, 1'44, Chapter 644 authorized and/or mandated a
tree tiered system of fees or, solid waste to be disposed of in
landfills. The theory behind the authorization of those fees was
that those who produce solid waste should pay the true costs of
d:sFosal. Mary of the costs of solid waste disposals are hidden,
..nknown or paid for by persons and units of government not
responsible for the production of such waste.
':HE AMM SUPPORTS THE CONCEPT THAT THE PRODUCERS OF SOLID WASTE
SHOULD PAY THE TRUE AND FULL COSTS OF SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL AND
COMMENDS THE LEGISLATURE: FOR ITS FORWARD LOOKING INITIATIVES
LURING THE 1984 SESSION. THE; AMM WOULD SUPPvRT MODIFICATIONTO
THE SURTAX OR D/SPOSAL FEE SYSTEM WHICH WOULD PROVIDE: MORE
INCENTIVE TO REDUCE: THE VOI.UME OF UNPROCESSED SOLID WASTE TO BE
L:SPOSED OF IN LANDFILL'S.
V
TRANISPORTATION
V-A MNDOT HIGdWAY FUNDING
An efficient transportation system is a vital element in planning
for physical, economic, and social development at state, regional,
and local levels Because of extremely high inflation, decreasing
state revenues from decreasing gasoline r,aIes, and federal
cutbacks in the early 1980,s MNDOT delayed a substantial number of
projects in the state and metropolitan, area. In the last
legislative bier,,;um, thi- ;.rot)lem was substantially corrected
with additional funding.
THE. AMM URGES THE. LEGISLATURE TO CONTINUE TO PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE
LEVEL OF FUNDS SO THAT NECESSARY HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE MAY BE
CONTINUED, NECESSARY ADrITIONAL HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION MAY OCCUR,AND
THE MUNICIPAL STATE AID HIGHWAY FUND LEVEL. IS ADEQUATE. ANY
INCREASE IN OR CHANCE IN FUNDING FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES SHOULD GO
:NTO THE HIGHWAf TRUST FUND.
V-B MNDOT TRANSIT FUNDING
MNDOT,by Legislative action a►id func?ng, is a major contributor to
statewide transit programs. This is especially true in the
Metropolitan Area where approximately 801 of the total transit
funds are spent. This imbalance is more than offset by the fact
that a majority of the highway funding is channeled to rural
Minnesota. Because of the large economically diverse population
but rather compact nature of the ':win City Metropolitan. Area, it
is an absolute necessity to prc:ide an effective and efficient
public transit service with: a variety of prugramn, such as
Rideshare and Project Mobility to protect the economic
viability of the area. Without a good transit system, the
Metropolitan Highway system woul nut just ce crowded, it would be
totally inadequate. Many elderly and handicapped persons residing
in the area primarily because of access to unique services would
to almost totally immobile. Finally, due to statutory constraints,
there are r,() funding resources availaoi•, for other anits of
government trj pick up the difference 1f the prograu..; are allowed
to deteriorate. Based on 1984 legislation, rove of there programs
will be transferrted to the new Regional Transit Boar, (RTBi. t
THE AMM REQUESTS THE. LEGISLATURE TO CONS,DER THE METROPOLiTP%,
RANSIT PROGRAM::; AS VERY HIGH P?1ORITY AND FUND THEM SUFFICIENTLY
TO MAINTAIN AT LEAST THE; CURRENT SERVICE: LEVEL.
V-C REGIUNA. TRANSIT BOARD (Kh"
,ne 1)14 leglS,,ation creating t?%e Regional Trim+:'.. Board
resolutiun to many of the apparent problems, associated wits, t!1e
MT'J an the major Metropolitan Transit Provider plann.ng and
coordinating the entire transit needs of the area. Alth-)ug,h the
legislat.ion recognize, that suDre�;ional and d,�veloping area needs
were importan!,, it did not mandate solution., but gavF: the RTB the
to ailvis.ry Godies an:, groups as
necessary. The Tra+;sportation Advisory Board (TAB) made up of ten
;10) municipal officials, 7 county officials, and a number of
other persons representing the public and various metropolitan
agencies has as part of its duties, fulfilled the role of advising
the Metropolitan Council and M:C on Transit Funding and Policy
Issues for many years. This advisory function should continue.
THE AMM ENCOURA3ES THE: RTB TO USE THE CURRENT TRANSPORTATION
ADVISORY BOARD FOR INPUT ON METROPOLITAN TRANSIT FUNDING AND
POLICY ISSUES AS WELL AS TO ESTABLISH A REGIONAL ADVISORY
COMv,I?TEE OF LOCAL OFFICIALS FROM THE DEVELOPING SUBREGIONS TO
?ROVIDE INPUT TO THE TRANSIT PLANNING PROCESS AND TO HELP DEVELOP
EFFICIENT COST EFFECTIVE TRANSIT SOLUTIONS FOR THESE AREAS. IN
ADDITION THE RTB SHOULD MAKE PROVISION FOR DEVELOPMENT AND
FUNDING OF PLANNING COMMITTEES ON A SUBREGION BY SUBREGICN OR
DESIGNATED AREA BASIS AS DETERMINED BY LOCAL NEEDS TO DEVELOP
SPECIFIC TRANSIT ALTERNATIVES FOR THOSE SPECIFIC AREAS.
V-D HIGHWAY JURISDICTIONAL REASSIGNMENT AND FUNDING
--ee State Highway Study Commission and Metropolitan Jurisdictional
.a3,: Force have been studying the possibility of reclassifying
=any roadways in the state as to appropriate use classifications
an. jurisdiction. This reassignment in the metropolitan area is
estimated to shift $6.1 million annually from the state and $1.2
-.::lion annually from the counties to the cities for an increase
$7.31 million annually for general maintenance and life cycle
'reatment (i.e. sealcoat, overlays, etc.). Although, this task
Wad be appropriate, if pursued, it could have a profound effect on
:icy finances and future ability to maintain good road systems,
especially if certain criteria are not met and finance
�':er-;a to established. Therefore, the AMM offers the following
as a gjide to continuing discussion and possible legislation.
-1 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
THE AM"", SUPPORTS JURISDICTIONAL REASSIGNMEN, OF ROADS BASED ON
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIVICATION, SUBJECT TO A CORRESPONDING MECHANISM
FOR FUNDING, SINCE CITIES DO NOT CURRENTLY HAVE THE FINANCIAL
CAPACITY TO ABSORB THE ADDITIONAL ROADWAY RESPONSIBILITIES WITHOUT
NEii FUNDING SOURCES. THE EXISTING MUNICIPAL TUFNBACK FUND IS NOT
ADEQUATE BASED ON CONTEMP,ATED TURNBACK:,.
A ROAD USER NEEDS STUDY IS UNDERTAKEN, THE AMM RECOMMENDS
INCLUSION OF A UNIFORM MEANS OF MEASURING NEEDS AMCNG ALL LEVELS
OF JURISDICTION; FULL CONSIDERATION OF ALL FUNDING SOURCES
AVAILABLE. TO EACH LEVEL OF JURISDICTION; AND CONSIDERATION OF
LOCAL EFFORTS REPRESENTED BY LOCAL TAX LEVIES, SPECIAL
ASSESSME.NT.3, DEVELOPER COSTS, ETC. IN THE FORMS OF CREDITS RATHER
THAN PENALT IE ) .
D SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS
STATE AID RULES SHOULD BE CHANGED TO ALLOW COUNTIES TO UPGRADE
COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAYS USING C.S.A.H. FUNDS PRIOR TO
TURNBACK WITH CITY CONCURRENCE AND WITHOUT PENALTY AS IMPOSED
BY THE RULES
WHEN A STATE OR COUNTY ROADWAY IS TRANSFERRED TO A CITY, INCENTIVE
FUNDING SHOULD BE MADE: AVAILABLE FOR IMPROVEMENT, OPERATION, AND
MAINTENANCE.
WHEN A STATE OR COUNTY ROADWAY IS TRANSFERRED TO A CITY, THE CITY
SHOULD HAVE TNT; OPTION OF DESIGNATING IT AS A STATE AID ROAD OR
LOCAL STREET.
IF A CITY CHOOSES TO DESIGNATE A TRANSFERRED ROADWAY AS A NoN
M.S.A. LOCAL ROAD, FUNDING FOR IMPROVEMENT, OPERATION, AND
MAINTENANCE SHOULD STILL BE PROVIDED.
THE AMM SUPPORTS USE OF A PORTION OF THE HIGHWAY MOTOR VEi;ICLE
EXCISE TAX FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE: INCENTIVE PROGRAM FOR
JURISDICTIONAL REASSIGNMENT
THE AMM URGES ADOPTION OF A LEVY LIMIT BASE ADJUSTMENT PROVISION
AS PART OF THE FUNDINU PACKAGE FOR ONGOING AND FUTURE
OPERATION MAINTENANCE OF JURISDLCTIONALLY REASSIGNED ROADWAYS.
JURISDICTIONALLY REASSIGNED ROADWAYS DESIGNATED BY A CITY FOR THE
M.S.A. PROGRAM SHOULD BE CONSIDERED SEPERATE FROM AND IN ADDITION
TO THE STANDARD DESIGNATION PROCESS SO THAT DEVELOPING CITIES WILL
BE ABLE TO CONTINUE DESIGNATING A PERCENTAGE OF NEW ROAD GROWTH
TO THE M.S.A. PROGRAM.
V-E STATE AND COUNTY HIGHWAY TURNBACKS
Current state law provide, that the state and/or county may
declassify a trunk highway and turn it back to a local unit of
government. The only pr.Qvisioh is that it must be in
good condition. The unit receiving the highway does, not nave tr;e
option to refuse title_ and must', thereafter, maintain the turned
back road. The local unit may add the turnback highway to its M:;A
highway mileage and even exceed the unit's mileage limit if it is
already at it de:;ignated limit. This will qualify that
particular stretch of street for MSA maintenance funds. However,
two problems exist: 1) the maintenance allocation may notbe
sufficient if the street is a high volume carrier, such as highway
8 through Ramsey County; and l') the miles of turnback designated
by the local unit as MSA streets will be deducted from the unit'.:,
future additional M.,A allocation limit, thus forcing the l cal
unit to totally maiantain that portion from its local funds or lose
the right to determine at ;t_. option other "Local streets a.a part
of the MSA system.
THE ASSOCIATION C METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES REQUESTS THE
LEGISLATURE TO MODIFY THE LAW f0 EITHER 1) ALLOW CITIES THE RIGHT
7C REFUSE HIGHWAY TURNBACKS FROM THE STATE OR COUNTY, OR 2) ALLOW
THE LOCAL UNITS MSA MILE LIMIT TO BE INCREASED BY THE MILES OF
TURNBACK WITHOUT AFFECTING FUTURE ALLOCATIONS AND ESTABLISH A
SPECIAL MAINTENANCE ALLOCATION FOR TURNED BACK HIGHWAY MILES BASED
0`: VOLUME OF USAGE. FURTHER, STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR TURNBACK
ROADS SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED BY MNDOT IN CONJUNCTION WITH LOCAL
UNITS OF GOVERNMENT, AND NOT MEETING THESE: STANDARDS BE MADE PART
OF THE CRITERIA FOR wEI CH A CITY MAY REJECT THE TURNBACK.
V-F '3CTRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS - ROLE OF ELECTED
OFFICIAL,
ne transportation planning process in the 'Twin City Metropolitan
Area has been developed in response to a variety of federal and
state ?aws and regulations. The Metropolitan Council (MC) was
formally designated by the Legislature in 1974 (1974 MRA) as the
agency responsible for the administration and coordination of said
planning process. Included within this designation is the
responsibility for 'Long range comprehensive transportation
r'anning required by Secti�.n 134 of the Federal Highway Act of
',y62, Section 4 of Urban Mass Transportation "ct of 1964 and
Se^lion 112 of Federal Aid Highway Act of 1973, and such other
federal transportation laws as may be enacted subsequently. The
planning required under the federal laws is commonly referred to
as the 13C' process (continuous, comprehensive, and cooperative),
and the MC is the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) under
federal terminology. Federal law and regulations require that the
MP) function as "the forum for cooperative decision making by
principal elected officials of general purpose local government"
a1� receipt of federal financial aid for the planning,
= nstruction and operation of transportation improvements in
;:rbanized areas is contingent upon the existence of a planning
process which is satisfactory to federal authorities. When the
.egislature designated the MC as the transportation planning
agency for the metropolitan area, it also mandated the
establishment of an "advisory body" to assist the MC and
Xe',ropolitan Transit Commission (MTC), now Regional Transit Board,
carrying out their responsibilities. While specific duties
.ere not assigned, the Legislature did specify that the advisory
:,_:y would cunsist of citizen representatives, municipal, county,
an: appropriate state agency representatives. This advisory body
:s now called the Transportation Advisory hoard (TAB) and contains
local elected officials among its membership of about 30
sfficials. The M'_ has consistently viewed the role of TAB an an
advisory bodJ based on the 1974 MHA. Hence, local elected
officia'Ls in this area do not play as vital a role in thy:
fe:erdl:y mandated ' JC' trdnnpurtatior, planning proc_e5s as war
intended by federal law and regulation. Although, the Federal
Regulations no longer require exclusive local official
representation as the MC, they stil maintain lk.,cal official
involvement in the MC and 13C' process In addition, the current
elected official participation and '3C' process has worked
reasonably well in this Metropolitan Area.
THE AMM SUPPORTS AS A MINIMUM THE CONTINUATION OF THE CURRENT
LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIALS INVOLVEMENT IN THE '3C' PROCESS. IF
MODIFICATION IS CONSIDERED, THE AMM URGES GREATER LOCAL OFFICIAL
INPUT IN THE SELECTION PROCESS OF THE: TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
AGENCY.
V-G METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM FUNDING
A good effective and efficient Public Transportation Service is
vital to the Metropolitan Area. The existing Highway System could
not handle the pressure of a reduced transit system. The elderly,
handicapped and lower income persons depend on public transit for
job transportation and service accessibility. The business and
Industrial community would suffer extreme economic setbacks if
workers and shoppers were denied public transit. Finally, the
state economy as a whole could suffer reduced income and sales tax
revenues, if public transit in the metropolitan area is allowed
to deteriorate.
THE AMM STRONGLY URGES THE LEGISLATURE AND RTB TO ADOPT PROGRAM
AND FUNDING ALTERNATIVES UTILIZING THE STATE GENERAL FUND, MOTOR
VEHICLE EXCISE TAX, PROPERTY TAX,FAREBOX, AND SERVICE EFFICIENCIES
TO ENSURE A GOOD EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT METROPOLITAN PUBLIC
TRANSIT SYSTE`", WHICH CAN PROVIDE: SERVICE EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN
EXISTING SERVICE.
V-H TAXI CAB REGULATIONS
The Taxi Cab industry is currently licensed and, regulated on a
city by city basis with each city provid.ng, its owns set of fees
and regulation:. A citizens League study entitled "TAXIS:
Solutions in the City; A New Future in the Suburbs," recommends
much deregulation and licenz.e authority vested with the Minnesota
Department of Public. ;,afety. One of the major thrusts behind the
Citizens League proposal is to free up the taxi industry into a
more competitive private business and attempt through this
procedure to create a climate whereby cabs and ci;.ies could
provide increased opportunity for rideshare programs and ether
vitally needed transportation opportunities, especially in the
suburbs. In addition, bills have been introduced in the
legislature transferring regulatory and licensing authority from
citi-en to the MTC. However, neither the Citiz"ns League document
nr,r ".. r,u !.. 11 --.cddre,.3 the com;; /ex prof, iem:; ar,roc i ated with
providing reasonable services to outlying areas or less desireable
districts of some communities. Even if a degree of deregulation is
advisable, some regulation will always be n,�eded making it
necessary to det(.:•mine who and how to enforce such regulations.
Since past attempts for central regulation and licensing have not
beer. successful, new legislation will be proposed which will
des`gnate the Regional Transit Board as the agency to develop
�nfforcr regulations, procedures, fare ceilings, etc., and oversee
municipal licensing.
H-1 UNIFORM REGULATIONS AND PROCEDURES
THE AMM DOES NOT OP?OSE DEVELOPMENT OF A UNIFORM LICENSING
PROC" S AND UNIFORM RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR REGULATION OF TAXI
CABS WITH LOCAL CONTROL AND LICENSING REMAINING A MUNICIPAL
FUNCTION. THE REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD IS AN APPROPRIATE. AGENCY TO
DEVELOP UNIFORM RULES AND TO COORDINATE AND MONITOR THE PROCESS.
H-2 CENTRAL LICENSING
IF LEGISLATION PROGRESSES WHICH WOULD REMOVE LOCAL P.UTHORITY TO
REGULATE AND LICENSE TAXI CABS, THE AMM MEMEERSHIP PUTHORIZES THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO ADOPT POLICY DELINEATING SPECIFIC CRITERIA
AND PROTECTION FOR MUNICIPAL AND GENERAL PUBLIC INTEREST SIMILAR
,0 1984 POLIO:.
H-3 RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS
THE AMM WOL ENCOURAGE CITIES LICENSING TAXI CABS TO DEVELOP
FECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS FOR PASSENGER PICK-UP.
'J-I LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT ALTERNAT'.' ES
:.:ght Pail, as an alterr."tivu trtins t opportunity, is becoming a
s::;ect of n,ch ccneern and is generating a great deal of activity
in the Metropolitan Area. The Metropolitan Council modified its
'transportation Plan to allow consideration, of the issue and
ccipleted in March 1981 a state financed preliminary corridor
:election, criteria study. That study looked at 15 possible
corridors and narrowed the list to 6 corridors that might, qualify
f;r further feasibility study. :t did indicate that University
Are. was a most likely candidate for further study, but lacking
f,.;n s nothing further was done. MNDOT completed a study, of
:?'awatha Ave. and developed an EIS which is currently under
re3lera1 review. The Metropolitan Council discovered in Aigust of
that a $',00,00:) UMTA grant ras available for, detailed LR:
a:ternative study anj submitted P. grant application, to study the
'.,r..versitj and Sid corridors. T;ie Governor and State Legia:ature
`.zvt become increasingly involved in this issue anallocated
revera: million dollars for ;.R: engineering.
The AMM is concerned by several issues. The original study is not
a corridor selection study but more a c-iteria development study.
Of the two corridors proposed for UMPTA grant study, the SW
corridor scored lower than other corridors based on the developed
criteria. The UMTA study assumes a corridor selection which does
not appear to have been done. The previous study was
predominately a staff function and did not go through advisory
committees or public hearings to provide input for criteria or
other major concerns that have not been addressed. Basically the
'3C' (continuous, comprehensive, and cooperative with local
elected officials involvement) process has not been initiated in
this area as it usually is for, Federally funded and other
important programs.
THE AMM STRONGLY URGES THE GOVERNOR, LFGISLATAURE,AND
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TO CONTINUE. THE '3C' PROCESS UTILIZING TAB,
TAC, RTB, AND PUBLIC INPUT TO ESTABLISH CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES
FOR THE STUDY OF LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT AS WELL AS ALL OTHER TRANSIT
OPTIONS WHICH COULD BENEF_T THE METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM. THE
PROCESS SHOULD INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SUCH ISSUES AS
SPECIFIi" TRANSIT ALTERNATIVE SELECTION CRITERIA; OPERATION FUNDING
AND CONTROL (PRIVATE, PUB;.IC, JOTNT POWERS OR A COMBINATION);
FUNDING MET3ODS; AND OTHER DEVELOPMENT WITHIN A CORRIDOR. THESE
QUESTIONS AND OTHERS SHOULD LE CONSIDERED SO THAT STANDARDS AND
PROCEDURES CAN BE DEVELOPED FOR APPLICATION TO CORRIDOR SELECTION
STUDIES AND SPECIFIC TRANSIT FEASIBILIT`.` STUDIES. PRIOR TO
APPROVAL, AL.. ASPECTS OF A PARTICULAR L.R.T. PROPOSAL SHOULD HAVE
BEEN STAVDIF.O AND PRESENTED TO THE PUBLIC AND APPROPRIATE
GOVERNMENTAL EODIES TO ASSURE. A VIAPLE SYSTEM.
V-J CITY SPEED LIMITS
Bills have peer, introtiuc— in past legislative sessions which
would grant cities the authority to set speed limits on city roads
and streets. The LMC has pol►cy which supports that authority for
cities outside of the seven county metropolitan area. Whereas
th i s policy of lc,c.a l authority for free standing rural roe put
state cities may be feasibit, it could be extremely dangerous and
confusing .n tt.e metropolitan area. The seven county metropolitan
area is made up of 140 continguous cities and a number of
townships. BecauncE of the compactner.,: of cities in this area, it
is often impossible to determine when one has crossed a boundary
from one city to the next. If one city ch;inges its limits, its
neighbor would either have to also change or post many
additional signs on each street crossing a boundary. This system
wou1J be coitly, extremely confusing to individuals, and might
cause some legal protlemn in cast of accidents. Therefore,
THE AMM SUPPORTS SPEED LIMIT CONTROL. OF CITY ROADS AND STREE":S AS
CORRENTLY PROVIDED BY LAW FOR THF. ME:TPPeOLITAN AREA AND WOULD
OPPOSE CHANGES TO GRANT GENERAL. S PFEC LI'tI' CONTROI. TO INDIVIDUAL
CITIES WITHIN' ',HE: SEVEN COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA.
V-K MNDOT/CITY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS
The 1984 Legislature modified payment proc eedures for project:;
where the state and city share in the costs through cooperative
agreements by allowing MNJDOT to pay as the work proceeds.
However, because of work load and the priority system used by
MNDOT in preparing and authorizing cooperative agreements, a
number of important local projects are being delayed and cites
are having to expend large amounts of local funds for land
acqui3tion and project preparations long before the agreement
process is completed.
THE AMM URGES MNDOT TO REtiiEW THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENJT PROCESS
AND INITIATE CHANGES SO THAT MUNICIPAL AGREEMENTS CAN BE EXECUTED
ICJ A TIMELY AND EFFICIENT MANNER.
V-" MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE Tt.X TRANSFER ACCELERATION
.ne Motor Vehicle Excise Tax was significantly increased in the
early 1980's and dedicated to the State General Fund to offset the
affect of a declining economy and reduced state revenues. The
:.egislaturc recognized that Highway and Transit Program needs were
growing and that ultimately additional funding would be needed in
tr.ese areas. Thus, a transfer of this tax from General Fund to
the Highway and Transit Funds was establishLd starting with 25% in
1985 and finally reaching 100% in 1992. Recent upward trends in
the various state tax rev-r,ue collections indicate that the
economy is recovering and t'"t more funds from traditional sources
should be available for general state government. Therefore,
,HE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE. TO CONSIDER ACCELERATING THE
TRANSFER OF THE. MOTOR VEHIC,E EXCISE TAX FROM THE GENERAL FUND TO
THE HIGHWAY AND TRANSIT FUNUJ TO KEEP PACE: WITH INCREASING NEEDED
EXFENDITURE:) IN THESE AREAS.
V-M BIKEWAY FUNDING
Tne state recently eliminated Grant Funds for Bikeway paths due to
the declining economy. However, more people are turning to this
form of recreation for both, health and economic reasons. For
safety it in essential that bike paths be t,rovided along state,
county, and city roadw-tys, especially in conjunction with State
and regional park system:, 'therefore,
THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO REINSTATE THE GRANT
PROGRAM TO PROVIDE SAFE 6IKEWAY PATHS.
Memo a84-67 / D
COUNCIL MEETING
NOV 2 G 1984
TO: City Council
FROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director CITY OF ORONO
DATE: November 16, 1984
SUBJECT: Giquor Store Operating Results - Three Months Ended
June 30, 1984
Comparative liquor store operating statements for the second quarter
of 1984 and 1983 are attached. Tie balance sheet and statement of
revenue and expenses are somewhat condensed from prior reports but are
essentially unchanged. The cost of sales st-item:ant has 13.�en expanded
to show cost of sales by type, liquor, wine, beer, and mix and
miscellaneous. The 1984 totals for liquor -wine and beer -mix are
shown so that a comparison can be made with 1983. The more detailed
information is not readily available for 1983 so this, method must be
used until the first quarter of 1985. 4 seperate schedule is included
for gross profit on sales by category - liquor, wine, beer, and mix and
�nisrellarn�o+ls. As with the cost of sales, the gross profit statement
compares the 1994-83 totals for liquor -wine, and beer -mix doe to
information limitations.
A condensed comparative
statement of
revenues
and expenses
is
presented below.
88COND QUARTEP
Y611R TO DA?L
_
If ff
— ---•----
1981
— 1f83 _
_ Under) 1987
1984
1983�__
(Under) 19i]
Sales net of discounts
$111,061
$114,193
S (242)
$199,485
$1981115
$9,179
Cost of Sales
Gros• profic
88 279
--- iT;fif
81,131
--wiff
(•S2)
-"" v
142,175
__sf;ffi
136,208
-3i,if3
$5,975
Operating expenses
Operating income (loss)
�18 861
].SfC
27,716
-_ S:f4r
2,34S
-IT,"ifs)
58,228
__ _1ic
55,18t
- (i,fill
3L128
fai
Nonopecating income
$69
398
471
I'S62
1,501
__ffX
61
Net income (Loss)
$Z, f0
........
5-_fX%*i
........
ffr77")
........
f-- €ri
.....,..
f-
........
3--ffd
......
The seconu quarter of 1994 had income of $4,390 compared to the first
quarter loss of $3,746. This is an income gain of $8, 136 between the
first and second quarters. For the first half of 1984 the liquor
operation had income of. $644 on sales of $1.99,485, compared to 1983 six
month income of $328 on sales of $190,115.
In the s«--(:ond half. of 1983 the liquor sales and income were $258,043 and
$20,837 respectively. However, third quarter sales in 1984 are
$22,250 lass than 1983 third quarter sales. With no significant
changes in gross prof i t or expenses the th i rd quarter net income wi 11
approximate the second quarter. if. the 1984 fourth quarter equals
1983 the total income for the year 1984 will be about $12,999 to
$15,000.
Memo #84-67
page 2
It may not be possible to transfer to the General Fund the amount
budgeted in 1984 with the projected neL income of $15,000 being less
than the $30,000 budgeted transfer. The retained earnings have been
reduced $15,800 since January 1, 1982 because the transfers to the
General Fund in 1982 and 1983 were greater than the net income each of
those years. There was $135,000 in retained earnings on January 1,
1984 but the inventory is usually between $95,000 and $.U5,400 and the
cash and invest.nents .ire about $35,000. Sufficient cash must '-je
available to properly conduct: the business of operating the store.
M84.67A
CITY OF ORONO
PiedICIPAL LIQWR S'I'-W,
BAI.APICE SEiE:rr
DUNE 30,
1984
JUKE-
1983
ASSETS
----------
-30,
---------
Current Assets:
Cash ano9 investim-ots
a" 3.1,173
S 43,605
Returned checks & credit
card charges
831
1,031
Accounts remivable
137
283
Accrued interest receivable
1,204
748
Prepaid exNnses
2,320
4,760
inventory for resale
111,743
114,205
Total Current Assests
$15+3,408
$164,632
Property and Equilrnent:
Leas -.hold improvanents
725
725
E;quipmnt
25,763
25,663
26,488
_
26,388
Less ac unalated depreciation
20,348
19,221
Met Property .ind Equiprient
6,14�
7,167
Total Ass2ts
$156,548
$171,799
I,I4131+.ITAICS All.) FUND EQJI'iY
Liabilities:
Act--ro-r-A wag�5 ,»gable
$ 2,725
$ 2,014
AccrueA retirement payable
482
477
Accrued credit card expense
146
153
Accounts payable
15,152
23,441
Due to States (Sales Tax)
1,904
--_l.,307
Total t,iabi 1 i te5
S 2:5, 6N9
S 27,392
Fund }:clu i ty:
Retained earinys January 1
135,295
144,09,
Net incay" January 1 to June 30
644
316
Transfers to General Fund
- -
- -
Total Fumi Equity
-135,939
144,407
►c)+..,1 i,i.t'�i liti.�s and Fund FquiLy
$156,548
$171,799
M84.67C
Sales aM Cost of Sales:
S rles
Sales di.-ounts
Met sales
Cost of sales
r:ros•c Profit
Operating Expenses:
Salaries mo wig.:;
Retir^•rnt contributions
WAlth t, life insur+nae
:brkers cnq-) inwre,re
Professional services
Operating and -mint supplies
Heat, light anJ paver
Depreciation
Rent, building
Maintenance laid rnalrn
Morin. chorga fro-, :rn. F•ani
Coaaunirations
Office supplies
Printing, publishimj t, advertising
Data processing
Insurances
Other expense
"tot Operatinj Exlr--nse
Operating In:yw- (Loss)
Hon Operating Revenue:
Interest on investm ots
Other
Total Mawpnrating Revenue
Met Incase (Loss)
CITY or OFKM
MONICIPAL LIOl10R SMkE
STATIMM OF 16.YME APV M1VT fZ
Three Months Ended June 30
-`19lfs T9_�3-
7inrxint { Salei A.iiount \ Sales
5115,492 109.00 $115.179 10a.0H
1,631 1.41 1,076 .93
fIf,AUl4 I 9d.59 l,i®i -ff.
00,279 69.51 81,131 79.4if
5-ii; i -K.23 $ _,'17i "ie:63
Six 4mths Ended June 30
-----
_ f98�`:_- - 8f 19------
A�iounc L Sales Mount f Sales
$202,734 100.44 5193,079 100.09
3,223 1.59 2,964 1.54
'199,41K 98.41 190,115 99.46
142,175 72.14 136,200 70.54
5-5
f;iili 'fa.if 7j'-ij;
16,473
14.27
15,339
13.32
32,638
16.10
30,728
15.91
1,630
1.41
1,44)
1.26
3,368
1.66
2,887
1.50
1,159
1.99
1,166
1.01
2,320
1.14
2,213
1.15
122
.11
139
.12
238
.12
237
938
.81
490
.43
1,888
.54
493
.12
705
.61
677
.59
980
.48
927
.25
982
.85
1,107
.96
2,291
1.13
2,276
.40
1.18
428
.37
136
.12
855
.42
272
3,725
3.23
3,633
3.13
7,400
3.65
7,200
.14
3.73
45R
.40
276
.24
945
.47
561
627
.54
601
.52
1,254
.62
1,202
.29
194
.17
157
.14
.M2
.19
320
.62
98
.08
54
.04
142
.07
111
.17
287
428
.25
.31
27
507
.02
719
834
.35
522
.06
.27
1,321
1.14
1,576
.43
1.37
1,86Q
.41
.92
9%
3,324
.51
1.72
486
.42
421
.37
995
.45
834
.44
_30 _041
26.0)
S ? i1e
=4.1-1
58,228
28.j2
SS,lY0
_ .Si
3,521
3.45
5,256
4.56
(910)
(.45)
(11185)
(.62)
864 .75
324
.28
1,527
.75
1,330
5 - -
74
.97
_ 35
.02
171
.69
.99
S 4.3" 3.801
........ .......
S 5,654
........
4.911
.......
S 644
........
.32%
.......
S 316
........
.161
..,....
M84.67D
CITY OF ORONO
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE
GROSS PROFIT ON SALES
Liquor
Sales
Cost of Sales
:gross Profit
Gross Profit
Wine
Sales
Cost of Sales
Gross Profit
Gross Profit %
Dotal Liquor and wine_
Sales
Cost of Sales
Gross Profit
Gross Profit
Beer
J•31r?S
Cost of Sales
GCoss Profit
::gross Profit �
Mix and Miscellaneous
Sales - ------
Cost of Sales
Gross Profit
Gross Profit %
Total Beer, Mix and Miscellaneous
Sales ~-----_�_
Cost of Sales
Gross Profit
Gross Profit
Three Months Ended June_ 30
---' 984 -_
$ 38,547
27,906
$ 10,641
27.61%
$ 26,957
17,091
$ 9,866
36.60%
Six Months Ended June 30
$ 70,198
50,925
$ 19,273
27.46't
$ 49,497
32,173
$ 17,324
35.013%
$ 65,504
$ 65,379
$119,695
$114,608
44,997
45,684
83,098
80,07L
29,597
$ 19,695
$ 36,597
$ 34,5'7
3L.31%
30.12%
30.58%
3q.13%
$ 46,409 $ 77,578
32,769 55,149
$13,641, $ 22,429
29.39% 29.91%
$ 3,579
$ 5,435
2,513
�1,066
3,928
$
$�1,507
29.78%
27.73%
$ 49,988
$ 49,800
$ 83,013
$ 78,471
35,282
34,447
59,077
56,129
$ 14,706
S 14,353
$ 23,936
$ 22,342
29.42%
28.82%
28.83%
28.47%
M84.67L
Liquor
Inventory, &_ginning
Purchases
Less Inventory, finding
Cost of Sales
Wine
Inventory, ginning
Purchases
Less Inventory, Ending
Cost of ,Sales
Total Liquor and Wine
Inventory, 80gimling
Purchases
Less Inventory, Ending
Cost of Salmi?s
Beer
Inventory, Beginning
Purchases
Less Inventory, Ending
Cost of Sales
Mix and Miscellaneous
Inventory, Beginning
Purchases
Less Inventory, Ending
Cost of Sales
CITY OF ORONO
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE
COST OF SALES
three Months Ended June 30 Six Months Ended June 30
1984 -�--- 1983 --- 1984 ---- 1983 ---�'
$ 45,282
33,232
78,514
50,608
$ 27,906
$ 49,639
21,462
71,101
54,010
$ 17,g91
$ 94,921
$ 92,651
54,694
_ 56,9_2_5
149,615
149,576
104,618
103,892
$ 44,997
$ 45,684
$ 3,440
34,245
37,635
_ 4,916
$ 32,769
$ 1,727
2,995
4,722
2,299
$ 2,513
Total Beer, Mix and Miscellaneous_
In`ven`tory, Beginning $ 5,167 S 6,299
Purchases 37,240 39,46_1
42,4517 45,760
Less Inventory, Ending 7,125 10,313
Cost- of .;ales -Tr),2T2 35,447
$ 52,886
48,647
_
101,533
50,608
$ 50,925
$ 54,942
31,241
86,183
54,010
$ 32,173
$107,828
_ 79,888
1i37,716
104,618
$$ 83,098
$ 4,667
_ 55,398
60,065
4,916
$ 55,149
$ 1,960
4,177
6,137
2,209
$ 3,928
$ 6,627
59,575
66,202
7,125
$102,614
81,349
183,963
103,892
$ 80,071
$ 6,797
_ 59,645
66,442
10,313
5��
CI•fY Of ORONO
ORONO, MINNESO'PA
1985 HUGET
FOR 'rHE YEAR
7ANUARY 1, 1985 - DECEMBER 31, 1985
CI'PY COUNCII,
MARY C. PUTLER, Mayor
'CHOMAS H. Vi24HM
Councilman
JAMES R. GRABEK
Counci linan
TIMO'PHY ADAMS
,ouncilman
•101ill C. HAMMERF.L
(Appointe-j 1-5-83)
Count: i linan
'AAGTER R. 13ENSO'J
City Administrat-oc
Cl)
_n
O
z
C
Z
e�
'n
r=
O
O
°°
.ram
T
z_'�
0
r f f
CITY or ORONO
ORONO, MINNESOTA
1985 BUDGET
TABLE Or CONTENTS
Page
General Fund Revenues - Budget vs. Actual 1906-1981
1
General Fund Expenditures - Budget vs. Actual 1980-1983
2
Conparison of 1985 Budget With Prior years' Expenditures
3
1987 to 1983 and 1935 Budget
Comparison of 1985 Budget to 1984 Budget
4
1985 General Fund Budget vs 1984 Estimated Actual Expenditures
5
General Fund Revenue - 1984 Estimate vs. 1985 Estimate
6
Assessed Values, Tax Levies & Mill Rates, 1994 vs 1985
7
Ass.!siod Values, Tax Levies G Mill Rates, 1989 to 1984 L 1985
Est a
Summary - Meana of Fininciny 1985 Budget
9
General FunJ Budget by Department
City Cnuncil
17
Alministration
13
Elections
17
Asseasina)
20
Finance
23
Legal
26
Government Buildings
27
Human Riyiltq
30
Police Protection
31
ire Protection
35
Planning, Zoning c ?rutsctive Inspection
36
Civil Defense
39
animal Control
40
Engineering
41
Public Narks - Street 4iintenance
42
Hoaltn and Sanitation - Public Health 4ursing
46
Parks an.1 1mcre3tion
47
Contingency
50
Park Fund
51
Improvoment an.1 Eq-iipmant Outlay Fund
52
G.D. Str-vet Aid RoiA Bond 1979 Debt Fund
53
Sewer and 'later Special Assessment Debt Fund (1966-1976)
54
1980 Scaor Special Assessment Debt Fund
55
1982 Utilities and Street Special Assessment Debt Fund 56
Liquor Operating Fund 57
Water Operating Fund 61
Sower Operating Fund 65
Golf Course Operating Fund 67
858udget.005
85Budget.O06
CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL FU(iD
Comparison of Budget to Actual Revenues
For the Years 1990 through 1983
Budget
1909
Actual
1990
Percent
Collected
Budget
1981
Actual
1981
Percent
Collected
Budget
1982
Actual
1982
Percent
Collected
Budget
1983
Actual
1983
Percent
Collected
General Properrj Taxes 4 rloeestead Credit
Delinquent Collections i Tax Forfeitures
Total General Property Taxes
Licenses 4 Permits
Septic System Inspection Fees
Fines end Forfeitures
Highway Users
$708,663
-
$740,663
37,990
26,900
12,500
S 699,090
11,156
S 701,546
43,076
17,440
22,904
971
=
991
114
87
183
$ 781,169
_
$ 781.169
31,116
20,000
0.500
$ 746,616
33,422
$ 789,038
52,553
16,408
31,314
961
_
100%
169
82
232
S 010,914 S
$ 818,914(b)
31,097
20,000
13,500
760,632
32,673
793,305
46,992
19,157
33,238
931
=
971
151
%
246
$ 909,573
--
S 909,573
30,200
:4,000
15,509
$ 865,018
11,187
5 909,205
71,243
19,305
37,518
951
_
1001
237
102
242
Contract Income - Police
Contract Income - Inspections
141,667
--
138,613
_
98
-
271.092
--
271,092
100
292,992
288,064
78
316,142
293.756
93
Rent Income
Loe41 Government Aid
Town Aid - Police
Payments In Lieu of Taxes(begirm 1981)
City Fes iervices(begins 1900)
State Aid - Diseased Tree Control Program
3,810
213.346
17,600
--
51080
20,0N
3,945
213,346
18,674
--
21,768
31,514
164
1W
103
--
435
158
1,800
210.708
24,OOu
1,500
10,000
29,291
3,600
218,690
21,939
2.445
29,424
-0-(a)
200
leg
91
163
294
-o-
3,600
236,905
34,450
1,009
19,000
5,083(s)
3,306
292,897
32,974
2.479
21,936
5,795
92
86
93
240
219
114
3,500
21%;19
14,450
000
.1,909
-
3."1
236,905
33,237
21555
37.476
_-
leg
in
%
128
341
Street Light Aaesseents(begins 1988)
Contributions from Other Funds
interest an Invastments (begins 190s)
Federal Revenue Sharing
1.s00
49,No
24.173
36,308
1,412
40,400
64,607
33,741
94
in
267
93
1,509
40,000
28,909
32,127
1,642
40,000
111,977
15,126
199
100
400
17
1,596
40,OCs
30,000
35,435
2.374
40,900
130,277
16,4;2
1S8
leg
434
46
1,769
36.000
40,009
39,727
2.219
36.099
129,395
29,911
131
in
323
75
TOTALS $1.281,947 $1,350,989 1051 $1,504.191 $1,596,240 1*1
.......... .......... .... .......... .......... ....
vote: Non -Budgeted receipts an not reflected.
(a) The City received $5,785 from the
state in April 1982 for 1901 pronram
The state has discontinued this rem.
Nothing was received for the 1! .get year.
$1,574,376 $1,638,324 104% $1,671,911
.......... .......... .... ..........
(b) The City received $13,920 less In
homestead credit from the state
than anticipated due to the state-s
fiscal problems. If time monies
had been paid the total collections
on taxes would be "I
$1,836.535 list
.......... ....
-1-
r�
85Budget.008
85Budget.007
GENERAL FUM
Department
Council
Elections
Adninistration
Finance
Assessing
Legal
Planning i Zoning
;overnxnent Buildings
Police
Fire
Civil Defense
Animal Control
Street
Health and Sanitation
Parks and Recrea.ion
Contingency i Transfers
Human Rights
Engineerina
TOTALS
CITY OF
ORONO - GENLRAL
FUND
Comparison of
Budget to
Actual
Expenditures
For the Years
1980
through
1983
Budget
Actual
Percent
Budget
Actual
Percent
Budget
actual
Percent
Budget
actual
Percent
1980
1980
Experxled
1981
1981
Ex erxkd
1982
1982
Expended
1983
1983
ExprrdW
534,542
5 37,390
108%
5 36,733
S 40,186
109%
5 45,738
5 40,319
881
$ 48,969
5 35,465
721
9,279
8,432
91
4,557
2,395
53
19,142
11,353
59
3,019
3,333
111
72,591
79,996
1J9
78,590
84,35d
107
88,247
$9,901
102
102,154
108,5,5
106
63,OC1
G6,30J
105
67,406
74,248
llu
15,402
75,413
IOU
92,360
83,138
101
40,300
34,803
87
4J,OOJ
40,052
IOU
43,179
39,610
92
39,786
39,753
IJO
45,600
35,977
71
56,000
45,222
81
52,900
52,768
10U
64,990
67,784
104
124,182
121,935
98
127,724
114,515
90
131,469
112.325
d5
136,312
136,399
100
33,610
45,536
135
38,71J
29,032
15
36,102
34,939
97
34,964
33,539
96
356,651
361,134
101
496,528
5UU,497
1J1
543,04J
518,Sd-)
9i
585,505
584,133
100
73,916
76,559
194
82,475
66,717
81
91,89J
78,d98
b6
105,822
129,409
121
1,310
795
61
1,320
3,111
236
1,561
827
53
1,825
2,451
134
5,230
3,402
65
4,850
4,541
94
6,366
4,6103
72
6,976
4,77J
68
301,487
293,651
97
339,777
287,490
85
348,423
323,929
9,
332,141
333,558
100
41,417
29,301
49
49,112
33,539
68
20,402
2,882
14
3,570
--
--
45,295
37,369
83
46,241
37,400
81
37,845
28,810
76
42,998
19,628
71
17,875
15,800
88
20,00J
10, Ow
50
20,909
18,233
91
70,000
69,815
100
2,870
2,878
100
3,102
3,982
99
3,410
3,355
98
3,699
3,626
100
8,000
6,944
87
19,960
1,979
10
9,089
892
10
6,920
1,244
18
$1,281,047
..........
$1,241,653
..........
971
...
$1,594,103
..........
$1,377,464
..........
92%
...
$1,574,276
..........
$1,437,644
..........
91t
...
$1,671,911
..........
$1,666,609
.........I
109%
....
-2-
r�
CITY Of OROYO
COMPARISON OT 19E5 SODGRT
MITN E2iPENDITORES OP PRIOR YEARS
1989 1901 1982 1983 1984 198S
CLASSIPICATION ACTUAL ACTUAL ACLUAL ACTUAL HUDGET BUDGET
General Fund
City Council
37,390
S 40,186
S 40,319
S 3S,465
$ 44,249
8 43,220
Administration
79,096
84,359
89,901
190,576
198,262
111,105
Elections
8,432
2,395
11,3S3
1,333
17,952
3,SSO
Asaossing
34,883
49,952
39,610
39,7S0
53,636
S3,410
Finance
66,300
74,248
75,413
83,138
87,628
92,S85
Legal
3S,077
45,222
52,768
67,784
69,000
71,058
Government Buildings
4S,536
29,032
34,939
33,539
39,266
41,135
ilumvt Rights
2,878
3,982
3,755
3,626
4,594
5,926
Police
361,134
S00,497
518,S87
584,133
646,253
688,989
Fire
76,559
66,717
78,898
128,409
112,526
137,459
Planning i Zoning
121,93S
114,SLS
112,325
136,390
145,149
IS9,730
Civil Defense
795
3,111
827
2,451
1,86S
2,18S
Aninul Control
3,492
4,S41
4,693
4,770
7,650
7,500
Engineering
6,944
1,079
$92
1,244
5,420
5,219
Str"t
293,651
247,490
323,929
31f,55a
161,513
376,711
Health a Sanitation (a)
29,301
33,539
2,882
--
3,77S
3,645
Packo i Recreation
37,369
37,499
26,810
30,628
41,139
45,795
Cont ingrncy/Transfers
Total
IS Sao
_1,17719'y 0
_ 18.233
a 69,BLS
_ 77;664
79,117
Ginecal
1,247,4
,46j
1,1)f,f,�4
ifit;d ,,Xff
1,25,1 8]r7
1,92 ,YI3
Pick 4Utd
7,711
7,661
141,023
890
-
6,333
t1prove i Erlu(p outlay Funs S,S39
36,992
-
22,845
39,S12
49,395
G.D. State Aid Rosd Bonds
Debt Reticement
1R,625
43,938
42,361
43,70Y
44,10E
42,267
Parking tat 7tbt
Rat(c ment Furrl (b)
3,233
5,093
--
--
--
--
1)ater-Sere[ Debt
R0t(resrrnt 1^56-76
478,414
466,807
449,924
363,045
378,487
3S2,597
1983 Surer 7tbt
Ratic.awnt
-
33,768
134,58a
155,532
15J,15S
144,978
1982 Svr-Wtr-StceoL
Rot icannot
-
--
--
--
18,666
66,613
ounwoody Debt Ratirumant
--
--
--
-
1,630
-
Municipal Liquor
Dispensary Fund
(oveclte.nd)
I",7UY
LJ4,073
105,994
113,993
121,916
126,149
Watec 'lpecat1mj rum
73,222
83,595
9'1,828
103,558
126,123
132,794
S3.mr 3,wcating Fuel
194,104
249,464
261,465
212,63d
319,266
288,705
Calf Course Fund
(overhedd)
52,26S
_ 61,853
_ __ 59,988
_f 59,177
__ 68,51i1
97,200
TaPAL ALL MNDS $2,181,115 $2,476,498 $2,601,717 $2,796,210 S1,091,711 $1,248,962
.......... .......... ...,,..... .......... .......... ..........
(a) ImIudes Shade •Prop Control, ➢irj.t Control, Pohlic I1041th Nursing
(b) Flnsl pnya►mt wide in 1981
e
85Budget.002
GENERAL,
SPECIAL REVENUE,
AND OPERATING FUNDS
1984 DEPARTMENT BUDGET
VS. 1985 DEPARTMENT BUDGET
1 of
1985 Widget
1985 Budget
1984
1985
Over (Under)
Over (Under)
GENERAL FUND
Budget
Budget
1984 Budget
1984 Budget
CEPARTMENT
City Council
$ 44,240
$ 43,229
S (1,920)
Administration
198,262
111,105
2,843
2.6
Elections
17,952
3,550
(13,502)
(79.2)
Assessing
53,636
53,410
(226)
(.4)
Finance
87,628
92,585
4,957
5.7
Legal
69,909
71,950
2,U50
3.0
Government Buildings
38,266
43,135
4,869
12.7
Human Rights
4,594
5,926
1,422
31.6
Police
646,253
688,989
42,736
6.6
Fire
112,526
137,450
24,924
22.2
Planning i Zoning
145,149
159,739
5,590
3.9
Civil Defenso
1,865
2,185
329
17.2
Animal Control
7,650
7,599
(150)
(2.0)
Engineering
5,429
5,210
(210)
(3.91
Street Maintenance
361,513
376,711
15,199
4.2
Public Health
3,775
3,845
70
1.8
Parks & Recreation
41,139
45,705
4,566
11.1
Contingency
20,300
20,009
Equipment Outlay Fund
37,604
39,737
2,133
5.7
Building Outlay Fund
20,900
2U,000
Total General Fund
$1,825,473
$1,922,943
S 96,570
5_31
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Park Fund
S - -
$ 6,390
$ 6,390
- -
Improvement and
EqQ ipaent Outlay
39,512
49,305
_ 9,793
24.81
Thal Special
Revenue Funds
S 39,512
S 55,605
$ 16,093
49.71
OPERATING FUNDS
Liquor
$ 121,016
S 126,140
$ 5,124
4.21
Hater
126,129
132,794
6,665
5.3
Sewer
318,266
288,705
(29,561)
(9.3)
Golf
68,501
97,29U
28,699
41.9
Total Operatinq Fund
S 631,912
S 6.14,019
$10,297
1.71
TOTAL Gr.NEItAL,
:;I'KCIAI. HF.W:Nllt:
Atli) Ul'ERA'rlNi;
$2,49H,H77
5l,LLl,4H1
$l!),'i9U
4.')1
FUNDS
.......,,,
.,...,�,,..
.,.,..,,
..:
-4-
F
8SBudget.001
U
1984 GENERAL FUND ESTIMATED ACTUAL EXPENDITURES
VS. 1985 BUDGET
1984
'85 Budget
1 '85 Budget
Estimated
1985
Over(Under)
Over(Under)
GENERAL FUND
Actual
Budget
'84 Est.Act.
'84 Est.Act.
City Council
S 53,497
$ 43,229
$(10,277)
(19.21)
Administration
195,641
111,105
5,464
5.2
Elections
13,224
3,550
(9,674)
(73.2)
Assessing
64,313
53,419
(10,993)
(16.9)
Finance
88,918
92,585
3,667
4.1
Legal
66,749
71,350
4,110
6.5
government Building
38,766
43,135
4,369
11.3
Hunan Rights
4,524
5,926
1,402
31.0
^olive
644,882
688,989
44,107
6.8
Fire
119,117
137,459
18,333
15.4
Planning L Zoning
14U,235
150,730
19,495
7.5
Civil Defense
1,605
2,195
533
36.1
animal Control
5,100
7,530
2,400
47.1
Engineering
4,960
5,210
250
5.0
Street Maintenance
357,972
376,711
19,639
5.5
Public Health
3,775
1,d45
7J
1.9
Parks and Recreation
39,083
45,705
6,622
16.9
Contingency
20,03U
23,000
- -
- -
E-juipmen Outlay Fund
J7,5U4
39,737
2,133
5.7
Building Outlay Fund
20,000
20,009
TOTAL GENERAL _UND
$1,829,056
..._,,,�..
S1,922,043
....
S 92,987
........
5.11
....
• . fA''4*" /IC J A "!N ►C Y
1
i
-5-
! f' � s•� ,Y . rsr:.a! a..p 1': . .• rr • � a}+:,
w
858udget
GZWERAL FUND REVENUES
1984 ESTIMATE VS. 1985 WrIMAT6
REVENUE ESTIMATE
1985 EST OVER/
(Under) 1984 Est
1984
1985
Mount
I
Taxes: Ad Valorem - Levy Limit Base
$1,090,109
'11,155,992
S 65,883
6.01
Levy Limit Base Cut by City
(68,683)
(154,948)
(96,265)
(125.6)
Net Ad Valorem Levy
1,021,426
1,001,944
(20,382)
(2.0)
Licenses and Permits
36,090
63,150
27,159
75.4
Intergovernmental Grants and Aids
Civil Defense
4,009
6,590
2,500
62.5
Local Goverment Aid
151,649
165,229
13,589
9.9
Police Town Aid
34,979
35,000
30
- -
MSA Street Maintenance
24,500
14,909
(9,690)
(39.2)
Police Training Reim.
- -
2,000
2,099
- -
Charges for Services
Qnwral Services Fees
2,509
4,500
2,900
89.9
Plan Checks/Site Exam Fees
i0,000
20,000
10,000
100.0
Cond Use, Variance, Subdivision
6,999
12,909
6,00U
100.9
Septic Program Foes
19,5U0
19,590
_
Contracted Police Services
350,099
370,715
20,616
5.9
Contracted Inspection Services
2,5U0
3,000
500
20.9
False Alarm Fees
1,000
11599
5U0
50.9
Admin. Charges to Other Funds
- -
5,755
5,755
- -
Fines and Forfeits
Court Fines
Dog Impound Felts
19,738
32,009
10,262
52.0
509
11000
509
190.9
Special Assess.,n•nts
Street Lighting
2,350
2,500
15U
6.4
Miscellaneous
Interest Income
80,000
110,00U
30,000
37.5
Rent - U.S. Post office
3,609
5,400
1,801
50.0
Receipts in Lieu of Taxes
2,009
2,500
SUU
25.0
Transfers In - From Liquor Operating
30,000
30,000
- From Fed. Rev. Sharing
! 23,150(a)
15,850(a)
(7,399)
(31.5)
$1,825,473
$1,922,943
S 96,570
5.31
(a) The revenue sharing amounts .available in 1984
and 1985 are allocated to policy
akparLmont use in t)w Cn-Wr.al
Full,] .mxl for other
dportwnits
u:ar in the
Equilinvnt Outlay Fund.
J
85Budget.4
CITY OP ORONO
Assessed values, Tax Levies, and Mill Rates
Actual 1984 vs. Estimated 1105
Assessed Value:
Real Estate
Personal Property
Contribution - Fiscal Disparities
Distribution - Fiscal Disparities
TOTALS
Tax Levies:
General Ad Valorem
Sever i Water Bond Debt
TOTALS
Mill Rate:
General Ad Valorem
Sewer a Water Bond Debt
TOTALS
Collectible Collectible (Decrease)
1984 1985 Increase t
$93,709,375 $100,205,162 S 6,495,787 6.9%
1,355,446 1,463,446 108,000 8.9
(1,586,532) (1,745,182) 158,650 19.0
1,721,825 1,894,925 172,200 10.0
$95,299,114 $10.,817,451 S 6,617,337 6.91
.......r... .t ......... ........... .....
$ 1,921,426 3 1,001,044 9 (20,382) (2.8)1
45,990 — -0 _ ^(45,900) (190.9)
$ 1,067,326 S 1,991,044 $ (66,282) (6.2)1
........... ........... ............ .......
12.741 9.832 (.909) (8.5)%
.483 -0- (.483) (100.0)
11.224 9.832 (1.392) (12.4)1
...... ..... ....... t......
-7-
3
,
859udget.009 '
•
CITY OF ON=
Coops Low of Assessed Values, Tax Levies, and Mill Rats
For the Years 190 through 1984 and 1965 Estiested
Sham by Year of Collection
Assessed Values:
1988
1981
Ince.
1992
Incr.
1983
Incr_
1984
Incr.
1985
Incr.
Real Eatate (a)
$54,145,527
$69,691,136
28.71
$78,SSS,436
12.71
S88,901,37S
13.21
$93,844,668
5.6%
$100,3S4,s0S(b)
6.91
Prrsonal Property
949,999
1,993,877
15.2
1,190,948
7.9
1,231,262
4.3
1,35S,446
10.1
1,463,446(c)
8.0
Total
$55,095,526
..........
$70,785,013
..........
26.51
.....
579,735,48E
...........
12.61
■....
S90,132,637
...........
13.01
.....
$95,200,114
...........
5.61
...■
$191,817,451
............
7.91
....
Tar Levies:
General
$ 682,2SO
S 730,339
7.0%
S 818,914
12.11
S 909,573
11.11
$1,021,426
12.31
S 1,991,044
(2.0)1
6, ' aid Interest
23,400
27,700
18.4
45,S00
64.3
45,900
.9
45,900
- -
- -
(190.0)
special Levis
26,413
50,830
92.4
- - (100.9)
- -
- _-
Total
$ 732,663
...... ...a .
S 808,669
...........
10.S1
.....
$ 064,414
...........
6.91
....
$ 955,473
...........
10.51
.....
$1,067,326
..........
11.71
.a..■
S I.N1,044
............
(6.2)1
.......
Mill Rates:
General
Bonds 4 Interest
special Levies
Total
12,381 10.290 (16.81) 10.262 (19.9%) 10.088 (1.71) 10.741 6.51 9.975 (7.1)1
.425 .391 (8.0) .571 46.0 .510 (10.7) .483 (5.3) - - UN A)
.479 .717 49_7 - - 10( 0.0) - - - _ -
13.287 11.496 (14.211 10.833 (9.51) 10.598 (2.21) 11.224 5.9% 9.975 (11.1)1
...... ■.■... ....... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... .... ..... .......
Note: Extremely large 1 of increases or decreases are not shown where the value is not significant.
(a) Real estate assessed values are net of fiscal disparities adjustments.
(b) 1985 figures for assessed valuation are not finalized. but should be accurate within 1.0%
(c) Estimated increase 51, figure not available from Hennepin County at time of prepara�ion.
-8-
CITY OF OWW - 1985 BUUGXT
SUP94MU OF !UANS OF FIHAlCIaC
1
Special _Revenue
Iaprove L
Debt Service
la A Assessment
Opecat.+g _ _
Revenue Source
Total
General
Park Equip atit
CO H��
-
80
19� �quor water r .urea
General Property Taxes
$1,001,044
$1,091,944
5 S
S
S
S
5 S S S S
Licenses 4nd Permits
63,150
63,150
Intergovernmental Grants and Aids
Civil Defense
6,509
6,SUJ
Local Government Aid
165,229
165,229
Police Town Aid
35,330
35,J0J
MSA Street Maintenance
21,759
14,992
6,8;9
KSA Construction Account
35,009
35,JUJ
Police Training Reim (14)Si)
2,944
2,000
Chargers for Services
General Service Fees
4,500
4,SOO
Plan Checks/Site Exam Fees
20,J00
2J,0W
Caxl Use, Variance, Subdivision
12,000
12,JJJ
Septic Program Fees
19,500
19,500
Contracted Police Services
379,715
37J,715
Contracted inspection Services
3,J00
3,J0J
False Alarm Fees
1,5011
1,500
AAnin Charges to Other Funds
5,755
5,755
Fines anJ Forfeits
Court Fines
30,400
30,0:IJ
Oag Impound Fines
L,OJd
L,JJO
Special Asaeswwnts
174,765
2,SJJ
146,152
119,854
106,265
Miscellaneous
Interest Income
243,145
110,OJ0
10,209 17,595
75
59,625
26,SU0
17,151
Rent Income - US Post Office
5,4JJ
5,400
Rocuipts In Lieu of Taxes
2,500
2,500
Park Dedication Fees
4,9J0
4,3JO
Transfers In
From Revenue Sharing
52,Ja0
15,iso
36,1'i4
From Liquor Operating
3J,OJ0
39,UJ3
Fraa rsnneral Fund
48,518
40,518
From Sewer Operating
15,731
15,981
Otlwc
2,126
J31
1,193
UJJ
Operating Income
644,839
126,149 132,794 288,795 97,299
Tran;fer (To) From Funx3 Balance
19 .16
(:,70v) (40,6511)
11J,H41
(4,565)
(37,S82)
TOTALS
$3,261,262
$1,922,043
S 6.309 :61,605
$42,267
$352,597
5144,978
$ 06,613 $126,140 8132,794 $289,795 $97,299
m
1984
CITY OF ORCNO (OPTION 021
DIVISION--
BUP)GET
YORKSNE=T
-BY OBJECT-__ AS
OF 10-01-84
PAGE 10
01 SENEA:.L FU'10 DIV
11 CITY COUNCIL
r CBJECT
OESCAIPTI]Y
1984
4 98s
198s
1985
1962
1983
1984
T.T-O
EST
O;PT
MaR
COUNCIL
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
APPROP
05-31-84
ACTUAL
IEOUEST
RECOMMO
AOOPTN.
410C
SALA+IIE.-►tG11LAh Ev*LOTE:
11924
12615
15?33
5$20
13249 1
13663 T
1!660 I
13860 T
a1S3
43RK..4A4S COMc :%$UAANCE
254
255
z89
laa
,?C. I
27S I
27S I
----
27S I
••.�••..-... --------------
.....•.-....-.•.-.-.....-_••
•.°•
.......................•..•-......
TOT Ad PEA.��.c>Il :=?.V::i$
INS)
12885
.......
13S1J
._.•-...._..._..•-..•-•.•...••-.•.--
564a
13517 I
ta135 I
Sat35 I
......•
1a13S I
.............•.-.••.-•••
..................•.._........-_-___......__.---_-•_____..____-_...._.._...._....................
4210
3FF:CE SUPPLIES
155
20
75
7s I
is I
75 :
7S I
.................
aCa�-•0]a(:•(
cEal�L:�:LS...............
;;.......
i.......
1'5------•----------15'.......175-......
-. ....-•17S.i..•
.
•.........................
.... .......................
....t..._..................•....................
..................................................
SSa
`
2SJ
:
...... ........
I
•....
- •....
...............................................
.
.....lr a ....L....................1..T
AI::`.0
..........
.
.. .................�..
.J
.
I
!
--_-------.-.-_-----_-.-•--..-
I....................
al b.CTM:°•C:•1$ul�...•itSV:CE•••»•••i1
..........
.......;;?;
-
1iL3V I^-•
--- :-•_-1----
_...-..
..••.-..•..-..•......•.-
........._.............-..•.-..._..._.�.
••••
.................
fOsa °.•:FESs::1:� i:aV:C 67SS
1�:5
..._......
5cu]
..-................
1a�?z
1'•!ii
..._........
67ti: I
---- --
57])•.
67fiu I
<S21.
.....:---............»........7a9...._......
........................I--`9__i
025
------
•-----5-`-:-----SOC----------------------
•--- ---.---------------
....-TC!.L
C:1Ml....-------
\
G9-.._
----------
-'v-----------------
SJ-_
:---------
SCO
see I
-•----------------------
a322..:.
..........
...•
? tP
-•--•---------S
;�
i
vJ
--------------i-------
;
------
1SDn
1500
1S]0
_.....................
.......•
...•
..................._....
ICTILR
•...-.................................•....•-_•
.
00I
--
1S:C
-• ----I--------------------
4Sl1•COC:°M!AT
0 v1:..':IT.L_...._.._.t7?
----_-2+2
..
----
----------••-----------------------
I
..•........•......
....
......................
•/i1L is i:Li
.................................a............................................................
172
?iz
2':3
r.?_
21.`. !
?1]
21C I
--
156•A.�i:
,:-cr.-::`9:.LS....----
« ..'5....---;51--'---
�V .._..---`-0
-------
*?y:
- - 2c)•;-----24)':-----2C
I--------------
....•i4i:a•ui�Ca~C:'1'°ACT......2]]._
.. a• .................
......e)!
I
._..-1:)S
.............................................
2ITCJ
-
..................
. ............
.; .......
216a......�515-------
57S
i
..:...................;....................
1:03......
;`........................
cs
iS/7•l..Mp.:rl•L:t4:_:Tt•..liUi....................-.................................
l=
_
..........................................
_...._...............
4'.7S
....................................................................
;►y JnA'.._ :47Vi )F ?_C)°]
76
76
.:'9J !
93 .
92 .
----
--- •--------...------•-------2V69--------?--...._
..--
--------�Sa---.._..a
.------1��-------------------------------------------
I
1:95 :
leis I
......._....
-..._.»........-.._....
.................___.-......._.-..-.........___....-........
._........
.•.........................
a3i:
�E:•'S'ai--P$
15:15
ISSat
1�Sa:
6)1S
1SS�: -
ltt3] !
1753^ I
17i3J :
aS!2
yE�T:a,. :Tc.•S-I
tad
..............---------
331
1•l^+
.....................
Vt
h.J
^.._....
3I. I
..........
377
...•.....................
30C
i3E)•:0'1:TI:i$-----•------------•--_-Sry,
..................
...S+L.......52------------------Sn�•:
-•----------------------------
------
---------I
5].....-_SG]•_-----5]:•j-----------------.-_
----------
........I..•_. --._.----------
t•99
QTr:°-CMaaSo.J
ca3-------Ztt
I
!
CI ^,_;(°:L
FUND :1°
11 C:TY 'GUSOM
1984 CITY OF ORC14U (OPTION 021 DIVISION-- BUDGET YORKSHEET -BY OBJECT AS OF 10-01-34 PASC�
% ,•! CBJECT OESCRIPIIGN 1984 /985 1985 1985
1952 1983 IM4 Y-T-O EST DEPT NGR COURCII __ _. . _
ACTUAL ACTUAL A?PROP 35-31-84 ACTUAL REOU_ST R_COMNC ACOFTM.
r TOTAL OTMRC r4G E5 16306 16610 17140 604 17240 i 1863 I 18630 i 18
-6-30- II
--•-•..... •.........
�...•....-.�.-..:............................................................-----••............----
4Pt.
------.................-....................... ............................................................... .................
.....
�..• f.... ..A.........t ..3
TOTAL AHOJNTS TnIS 41VISION 4019 3S465-44240• 28386 •S3497 I 4322O I• 43220•I •4SZ20 :-
................................................. .............. .....................................................................
11 SEkER:.L IL113 OV 11 C?TY C3UNCIL - /I-
A a it
PERSONAL SERVICES
FUNCTION _ .__.
_____ FUND_ General
DIVISION
NO. OF EMPLOYEES
1984
1985
1985
--------------
POSITION TITLE
PRESEN'P PROPOSED
ESTIMATEw
PROPOSED
APPROVED
Mayor
3,152
3,300
3,300
Council Members
4 4
10,a97
10,560
10,560
TOTAL SALARIES
13,249
13.860
13.860
Mayor 1984 $262.68/mo 1985 $275.00/mo
Council 1984 $210.35/mo 1985 $220.00/mo
Object t.11380 - Memberships: LMO D
11,976
12,910
12,910
League of MN. Cities
3,281
3,550
3,550
Assoc. of Metro Munic
1,233
1,320
1,320
Other
50
50
50
TOTAL MEMBERSHIPS
16,54(3 17,830 17,830
1984 CITY OF ORONO
01 GENERAL FU90
j OBJECT DESCRIPTION
A
A
(OPTION 021 DIVISION-- BUDGET MORKSHEET -BY OBJECT- AS OF 10-01-84 PAGE /j •,
DIV 12 ADMINISTRATION -
labs 1955 1945 1985
1982 1993 1994 Y-T-O EST DEPT MGR COUNCIL
ACTUAL ACiJAL APPROP OS-31.64 ACTUAL RECUEST •ECCNMC AOOPTN.
••_ 413C
SALARIES-AEGUL•A EMPLOYCE
:2197
61741
75335
24674
14495 I
79445 t
79445 I
79445 t
r4111.OV=RTINF:REGULIP.EMolOYE........333.......5G3.......6C0........41.......3G..I
.........
.......00.
....!...
- ...._...
..- . .1 ....................
a12,
SAL:iiFS-T:MP FM-LpY_FS
3/
2221
1230
709
1550 t
1600 t
1600 t
1600 I
-•-----------------
4131
-------------------
VACAT:•)'I PAt tci9G 9971
---------------•-----•--------------------------------------------------
70...
S134
--1---
1 -.--.-•-1...-.---.t--
----•-I-
------------------
4132
►.pL:)wY-�A♦ tp%O; Y361--
.1
19r7
••-2t39
-•--- •••••-
-•-2340..
SS1
•_---.• I
I
I
...
............
a133------
..................................---•--•--.............;........................-............---•-----............
PAY
12314
-... L--------
_
.---.--.-.----------
1135
-tGROG.9d9i--.-...-.-------..--._23?3------.-----•------------------I-----..-------
IN.I:aY CAY (DACG 400)
9446
I
I
t
.....-... ..
..........
4136
......................•---...-•--•-----.-..-.-.....-..---•-••-..-.-..-•----.-------•----.----•--.---......-
IJTMCL ��Y lF�p, VVe1
Ai
I
---
t
I
--•6228-f---
I
_•_._•_-••---•
4141-�EF:•C:rt-C�!ITn:9UTIJN--
.
+--5:73-•
7`!7
--- er77--
- 2St;-_..••55:1.
6216-I--.-a22l.,
.......__.........
alit
...............---.-.--.-...-.�
FIC..•C:TY CC'.Tn;9UT:)N
•9s
; 1a
....-..---...-...--------------.-.----.-----------------------...-.-----........
1W
41;
1516 :
4
2`d:
I384 i
2364
a1l1'h3•S.'TSL:tAT:J•I.:'1'3JiAM:_---"-"
765••--S3)5••••••i7S3-•••••2:7-----------------------------
••
:aa------•-m---I••••----------------
...........................................
.........................................
fit......................- .....................
4152
..FE :N:'J414. !
e37
3a9
377
1 •J
-----••--712•!
400
_�J:
•---------------- -•---
40�
-------------
4001
-------•••-------•-
41S3--i3K*A
.....`i3U-:9C:--------.573_••-------••-•-----*---•---
Ili
1)56
.--.--............-.
..............---.----.----w-------.---.....
t
••••
_
T:T:L-�Ei1S;'I:L --•----76164-..--!6v56
.---93t9:•
34432
7:171 1
96131 1
96131 :
---i..--'a25-=...••••••••••••••••
96131 I
a21L•CFF:.r
;IJFFI;r•�-----------
-----
51"--.-.-355•........;:------117�--••--SS43
i----342S-I-
•-
--._.---I--.---.---•••-•••
]42S
•-•
aC2:••cU"LS-S
.• ••
007.4 U5A.;4Nr;
646
-
1326
--------
1415
Sts
1475
155] 1
1SSO1
155:
......
atS2-EOu:aM:4T
?:4T: S-A::ES--------
..----------
1'1.._--..t0=---------
7-.-..--100-i._..•225-------125-.••.••125•I--------------
--iS7
-..-..334...-.-•45C
................
4t4:
,.-ic::%i;.L;.............•.37��--
S:7
_ g3 1
50:.:.....S`^.I....
-..
............-...-...........
.................................•-------•-_...-..._•+��----------
.--------------------------------
••••
T4i:L SU=�L:iS-":ii-pE::;
)'SS
Slot
;2/S
21i:
S.'•25
.�OvJ I
SIM i
56CC I
................_.-.......-..-..--•-•-----•-------••--------------•--------------.---
:lti...-..._....... ............................
4306
CTHT_R C:!ISUL1:'.; Sd9V:::;
i8)
59^5
153:
115:
1:2^1
AIJI:
1500 :
1S7: I
....
..........................................._..-•-_-...-...._._-_-_-____...._•-_•-_•L..-..........--......_.......................
••••
TOT:: it.F�i4:,'1=L i:'v:;
;!:
S9'.S
15:
115'
1<^)
,iSJ^
-.
1513
----------.--....------•-------
1SC: _
tSiu.TFl_=HC._-...............................-t25r...........
...
•---
). I--.-----
- I
-
I
•
14L0 I
- -••••••••••
4121
fCSitGr-------------------------
114.•
------ 556------
.725--
3'4
703 I
7Sl I
•
750_:--.--
-
750I••'••••••
- -......-....•..__.
..•.-TO1,L
Ci.t!IUA.CJT:)'tS------------
1�63-.....;y"
....-7'2S-.
------ 773•-
•--2
_.]•---,2
.
15^t
i150 1
2153 t
----..-----_-----.
4Slt•fd:AT:ti:-A
FL9L:;r1:'�;--- ^-•
•• SA-••-•--ibl-.
2S------------
.....
25) 1.
-7S]
2S3----------?Sc
,'1 .iEhrA.L
i�L:7C Ov
12
_13—
1984 CITY OF ORONO
01 GENERAL FU90
j OBJECT DESCRIPTION
A
A
(OPTION 021 DIVISION-- BUDGET MORKSHEET -BY OBJECT- AS OF 10-01-84 PAGE /j •,
DIV 12 ADMINISTRATION -
labs 1955 1945 1985
1982 1993 1994 Y-T-O EST DEPT MGR COUNCIL
ACTUAL ACiJAL APPROP OS-31.64 ACTUAL RECUEST •ECCNMC AOOPTN.
••_ 413C
SALARIES-AEGUL•A EMPLOYCE
:2197
61741
75335
24674
14495 I
79445 t
79445 I
79445 t
r4111.OV=RTINF:REGULIP.EMolOYE........333.......5G3.......6C0........41.......3G..I
.........
.......00.
....!...
- ...._...
..- . .1 ....................
a12,
SAL:iiFS-T:MP FM-LpY_FS
3/
2221
1230
709
1550 t
1600 t
1600 t
1600 I
-•-----------------
4131
-------------------
VACAT:•)'I PAt tci9G 9971
---------------•-----•--------------------------------------------------
70...
S134
--1---
1 -.--.-•-1...-.---.t--
----•-I-
------------------
4132
►.pL:)wY-�A♦ tp%O; Y361--
.1
19r7
••-2t39
-•--- •••••-
-•-2340..
SS1
•_---.• I
I
I
...
............
a133------
..................................---•--•--.............;........................-............---•-----............
PAY
12314
-... L--------
_
.---.--.-.----------
1135
-tGROG.9d9i--.-...-.-------..--._23?3------.-----•------------------I-----..-------
IN.I:aY CAY (DACG 400)
9446
I
I
t
.....-... ..
..........
4136
......................•---...-•--•-----.-..-.-.....-..---•-••-..-.-..-•----.-------•----.----•--.---......-
IJTMCL ��Y lF�p, VVe1
Ai
I
---
t
I
--•6228-f---
I
_•_._•_-••---•
4141-�EF:•C:rt-C�!ITn:9UTIJN--
.
+--5:73-•
7`!7
--- er77--
- 2St;-_..••55:1.
6216-I--.-a22l.,
.......__.........
alit
...............---.-.--.-...-.�
FIC..•C:TY CC'.Tn;9UT:)N
•9s
; 1a
....-..---...-...--------------.-.----.-----------------------...-.-----........
1W
41;
1516 :
4
2`d:
I384 i
2364
a1l1'h3•S.'TSL:tAT:J•I.:'1'3JiAM:_---"-"
765••--S3)5••••••i7S3-•••••2:7-----------------------------
••
:aa------•-m---I••••----------------
...........................................
.........................................
fit......................- .....................
4152
..FE :N:'J414. !
e37
3a9
377
1 •J
-----••--712•!
400
_�J:
•---------------- -•---
40�
-------------
4001
-------•••-------•-
41S3--i3K*A
.....`i3U-:9C:--------.573_••-------••-•-----*---•---
Ili
1)56
.--.--............-.
..............---.----.----w-------.---.....
t
••••
_
T:T:L-�Ei1S;'I:L --•----76164-..--!6v56
.---93t9:•
34432
7:171 1
96131 1
96131 :
---i..--'a25-=...••••••••••••••••
96131 I
a21L•CFF:.r
;IJFFI;r•�-----------
-----
51"--.-.-355•........;:------117�--••--SS43
i----342S-I-
•-
--._.---I--.---.---•••-•••
]42S
•-•
aC2:••cU"LS-S
.• ••
007.4 U5A.;4Nr;
646
-
1326
--------
1415
Sts
1475
155] 1
1SSO1
155:
......
atS2-EOu:aM:4T
?:4T: S-A::ES--------
..----------
1'1.._--..t0=---------
7-.-..--100-i._..•225-------125-.••.••125•I--------------
--iS7
-..-..334...-.-•45C
................
4t4:
,.-ic::%i;.L;.............•.37��--
S:7
_ g3 1
50:.:.....S`^.I....
-..
............-...-...........
.................................•-------•-_...-..._•+��----------
.--------------------------------
••••
T4i:L SU=�L:iS-":ii-pE::;
)'SS
Slot
;2/S
21i:
S.'•25
.�OvJ I
SIM i
56CC I
................_.-.......-..-..--•-•-----•-------••--------------•--------------.---
:lti...-..._....... ............................
4306
CTHT_R C:!ISUL1:'.; Sd9V:::;
i8)
59^5
153:
115:
1:2^1
AIJI:
1500 :
1S7: I
....
..........................................._..-•-_-...-...._._-_-_-____...._•-_•-_•L..-..........--......_.......................
••••
TOT:: it.F�i4:,'1=L i:'v:;
;!:
S9'.S
15:
115'
1<^)
,iSJ^
-.
1513
----------.--....------•-------
1SC: _
tSiu.TFl_=HC._-...............................-t25r...........
...
•---
). I--.-----
- I
-
I
•
14L0 I
- -••••••••••
4121
fCSitGr-------------------------
114.•
------ 556------
.725--
3'4
703 I
7Sl I
•
750_:--.--
-
750I••'••••••
- -......-....•..__.
..•.-TO1,L
Ci.t!IUA.CJT:)'tS------------
1�63-.....;y"
....-7'2S-.
------ 773•-
•--2
_.]•---,2
.
15^t
i150 1
2153 t
----..-----_-----.
4Slt•fd:AT:ti:-A
FL9L:;r1:'�;--- ^-•
•• SA-••-•--ibl-.
2S------------
.....
25) 1.
-7S]
2S3----------?Sc
,'1 .iEhrA.L
i�L:7C Ov
12
_13—
r
1984 CITY OF ORO%0 (OPTION
02)
DIVISION-- BUOSET YORKSNEET
-BY OBJECT AS
OF 10-CI-84 PAGE /7/
F-
r�LG}NC,t}_ FUND - DZY
12 AONINISTRATION .—._�
._.-----
---
---
----
- -
_ - - -- -- - ., ---
1954
loss
1985
1985
cBJECT DESCRIFYI W:
1982
1983
lost
Y•f-D
EST
t!EPT
NiR
COUACIL
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
APPROP
05-31-84
ACTUAL
REQUEST
PECOMMO
AOOPTN.
- 4313 AOVEhT:SING
59
75
75 I
75 I
-----_•-•--------.
75 I
7s I
....•-•........
_..«----
TOUSLISr-AO
•._
....
..•_•••.9
t6
325
325 !
325 I
._.__--___-..._..__._...___._....
325
3 t
--G-UIP-M-E-VT..........y......
.i•.S•.•t.u•....•-
.._..___.
.........-.......----�__--
375
272
375
375 I
375
375 I
M.a.;N.T_O1_C_E-
AITIT AJTO EjUIENT
iStt 'I; "I'ti'
269
7S0
lsl
75J
600 I
600 I
60G I
•._
tSl2•MAI••+T �:YC EGLZ°YEKT•_._.___---'23t
....................
-
-�_...__9
.-..___-----.__--
-.A•GL.fLiiCJ.T,:Lu-s.:a7T.\:C•.:nIt-.yiEr.1i;.ii.EU.LULPF'.a�.3]�Zr.A'.IaAA.:c].Cf'vh.\.::i-T.C5.Y.C:•,._1:l.T:M:A�:.•T..):UI-7f.N
•..ttt.tt•ttt•.S.SS.33.SSSS•..)7l.).tl7tlO.•t.7.12)S.
1ETiB.5T.AAi..�ACo'o.]JV1sL.a�L:<.:E
I•..••..-•..••_.•....
-....-.._.-.._.l...V•1t-Z73;7•.•.-_-.•
-.-.-.1.1•2__-•_-.
[3-..._..-1.1.2S_..I__
-....•-----_
975
__•--.-.-._...-_-_--..-.•--.---.--..�--.-
-•3T
-------'•--
7-..-Li...RS•s..!E�C..o':J....io..
_-----
._..-•-.--_---------
112"
1233
412
.-•_-__._
1?02 f
1203
.---_-
100Z
-_...
127CIlit(
-------------- --
__.•_
.....................................
-V
_A cJ•T;ACTSEP.....................................................................................................
•.____l�u.•.--
12Mt
�
-._•._
1207
..............................................................
t12
1200I
__..._-_.___
12�
1200 I
....._;7---•_.._.___...___-.-
^C 1
_
431L �E:,*rAl .0 L:TY T%3UR
•_-•-..�...._..2S'_•-_•_•.-._
t7
5
1J3
-_I. ......
J3
171 1
...-.1.I-_..._...__.____:-..__1_--._..__.-_i
1711
.I
11
."I .___--••--..._..._--
_Ci._-_---------
...�..:+:.
__---2_t__
---
____-.-_____•-_•
.___-._.t._.__-_._I-•_.-_._-_........................__..y.__..
•
--........3^••
-*-____-__---.i.
-._..._._.____---...
`...
i0
___......._.-_.........
-_.?1.7.6__.._--o-__..-2.53)
I..___2SO_.--_..___.._-__-_.....-
-Z
.. ...........I...................._
T'T
...6.
--
---
97t
I
---:.._St5it12
i
_•_•_•
..-....-2_.._.._-----
5
65v
115CI
Isis
e7_-v-S.
.•.M.TiIPTAr.I1MI.0r.UJOM.ROsR.
E-RK:'1c. ....
------
.•.1-5-.S`b�
:�;..------6
_.._.•._.9.3-)..-S..•
_
1)
--•------------
Ic
'C
'...._.....--•-----.-
cTSi.....'--ti-
.......
S•--------
-;9.--•--'t--
-------
SC.
C.
..._............._.............................................................Q....................�............................
4$6! LIC:"S=5 t T:r'S
S6
6)
SS
39
3 :
6S I
65
65 I
.................................................................._............................._....._.................._......
•.e TOT:L )1'-E4 CM-A;ZS
2.JS!
2C)t
..............................I.........5........................................
1341)
964
1164 ;
2251 :
225: :
M ; I
.............
iStt
F......
........
. .
.
................................................................................
.....T=1].-C]Flftl-+LTL.T...-•-------tS7.•----.?1V-'
t/Y: FR;hC=0•IAT:?ru'1D L)A!:$
i3SS
13fv
iSc'S
1SSS T
..•. ._......__...__..
T4TAL TP.]ASFLRi
lids
....
1345
lids
-
.........................._...
::SS.. *NJ
--------------113S--------_..t..---.____•---•--._I_....---_•_-__._....
----------------
bv._..-__...-I--_-•--•-•
--------- i....................
...._I�..=....`J:Y;..__........f.._.__.ttV........A9_.
...............P_3:aiuP.:y_-'_---•-_-------_-•-----••---•-by------------__-•._0---••-_-_----•---------•_----•_•[-----•-_-•--•_----__
l'1 ,EaE°-1 F0.0 ov
tt 47v:1:ST4tTi01+
-14-
45N
�.
fT'?4.ya,r'•:S``
1964 CI1T OF ORCNO
(OPTION 021 DIVISION— BUDGET YORKSNEET -81 08JECT AS
Of 10-01-64
PAGE /S
�—
01 GCNERAI- FUND
-.OiY 12 AOMI'IISTRATICN ---• ------�-�-�_
_.
_ _f
.— .� ----
----. — . ----
-- --
1964
1985
1985
1985
FlCT OEiCRIPTION
1982 1983 1784
T-T-O EST
OEPT
RGA
COUNCIL
ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP
05-31-84 ACTUAL
REQUEST
RECONNO
AOOPTN.
�.�
-+' AMOJNTS THIS CIYIS:ON
87901 104576 108262
41351 105641 I
111105 I
111105 I
................«..«....:...........
111105 I
'y,�.•,,
'aYarYY �+•6�1 -�:11
_TOTAL
1•............... «......................................................
............•_.�
...
1+1 ::NER:L FU11D DY 12=13Y:•1:ST;.T:OK -IS'—
PERSONAL SERVICES
FUNCTION ___.______________
FUND_ General
DIVISION
Administration
NO: OF _EMPLOYEES
19841985
1985
POSITION TITLE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
PRESENT
_ _ PROPOSED _ _
_ ESTIMATED
_ _PROPOSED _
_
_ _ APPROVED---
City Administrator
1
1
43,875
45,630
45,630
City Clerk
60%(a)
90%(b)
7,970
19,130
19,130
Deputy City Clerk/City Clerk
60%(b)
--
11,490
- -
- -
Deputy City Clerk/Office Co -Ord
--
30%(c)
- -
6,375
6,3-75
Assessing Clerk/Typist
15%(d)
15%
740
2,470
2,470
Office Coordinator (Deputy-
25%(c)
--
4,965
- -
- -
Treas.)
Part-time Secretarial (Recorder)
50%
50%
5,455
5,840
5,840
TOTAL
74,495
79,445
79,445
Temporary -Part-time Clerical
50%
50%
1,551.7
1,600
1,600
(a) City Clerk resigned 7-31-84
(b) Deputy City Clerk appointed City Clerk 7-31-84
(c) Office Co-ordinallor appointed Deputy City Clerk 7-31-84
(d) Hired 9-1-84
-16-
" 1984
CITY OF ORONO (OPTION 021
DIVISION-- BUDGET YORKSNEET
-BY OBJECT AS
OF 10-01-84
PACE /% '..•ice
rl
ELECTIONS
' OBJECT CESCRIPTION
1984
1985
1985
1985
1932
1983
1014
Y-T-9
EST
DEPT
MGR
COUNCIL
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
AP°ROP
05-31-51
ACTUAL
REQUEST
RECORMC
AOOPTA.
4100
SALARIES -REGULAR EMPLOYEE
S766
2433
5789
1669
5750 1
2340 I
2840 I
2840 I
_
-..............-•---............---...........---................------....-------------..........------.........-----.--
tilt
OvERTIrE-REoUL:.R EMPLOYEE
171
Soo
57
.
375 1
...... ....................
I
I
......-----...-.
I
...
..........................-...-..-........-..--........-..................
t12i
SAIAaIE+-TiMP :NpLOYEES
1..
...
I
I
I
I
i131
VACATINN PAT (Paco 93?1
..
•-•---•-------
r7
------------
I
---------
I
.---------
I
---------
I
». .....--------------
...........................-------------
.---------------
.............j
...................i
........
t...............
....
t133
-+iCM Pat t�RCG 9091
.................................
-1
I
I
I
I
---------------------
-....---......
4141
...................................................-.-....--•--...-.-.....-..._-..--......-.-..-
FE°:-C:TT CC'JTi euTIOY
594
227
637
30)-1
125 1
12S I
125 I
..........................-..........-.........-.............
itt2
FIC: C:ft CO'Jin:RuiIOY
ltt
62
----.-1c3-
401
......
46
...............-----.............................
430 1
M) I
.............................................
2C? I
200 I
t1S3•w:RarA:S
CuM°•:'1;URSvC:--..-.......-.......-_...-.-..--.-..-.;;..-............
;j
Ic ;
.....-....-
••••
-_-•------------ .........................................................................................................
*9TtL °C�S:•:AL
57v6
2c1S
11,537
?151
•-•---------t---'..
636S I
3175 I
--1'3-1-----100-:--------
3175 1
3175 I
--------------------
t21:
)FF::E SUP:I'ES_+.........---•--s?1...-...-•-1--
-------------
.
-----
t---- ----:-:-:L3-------------;;;-------.--------------------.-----.---.--------------------.--.--------I-.---
....................
...•-TOT:-;U=O�I:S-'I:I•i.o:°aI..
•t22-•--•-...y
.....•SO?••...-.--2.
.......
.................................:.........*.........I...
Ci.`
.
tl�3.........
o......f•G-SC........................`Z
--. ..
t SLS
:i::•:?J: CC.%' LT:VG------.--.1,;-.------;----------------.--.----------.-----
---------:-•----...;--.-..-.-I.......-.........-..
.
tliL
_LE�i:!'1-JUOaE;--------------
••-------
3�73
-------
5;0V....-..----•---•
5,103:
......................
••••
.....................................-........................................................................
TCT:L Pi'oFC.S:)•1.L S=RV::
3161
70
SI)i:
5;s: I
•••---.........-S_�------
I
I
......----.............
tS2�•-ELE:y±:r
-__.....................�
...........�......
'
.....
.................
I
2
..............................................
tl11
_- _ -
:9ST:5r
135
t•:•
1)^
--------
153
--------
--------------------------:.---.-----.-----.---------.---
S?9
15?
••--175
157
iS_ I
- ..............
»....
------- ...-•2St-------
IDS-• ------
325
1SS
S2S
I75 :...--
175I
»_---
......-.......
iS12
.....................................................-----....................------...........................
pi2,J'1':4 A FUel:0n:r1:
371
325
12
325 !
.....................
1
---------
I
------•-----•S2S
-------;�--------25
l-.........----------
....................................................................................................................................
(Stu
1.1%T :FF:LE EIU:PYQfJT
39
1
I
..•.
,----- erp.... ..
... ...........;V•---•-----------.-------...------------.-.---------.--.--.--.i--.--.------.---.-.-
.........
.................O
........O
.....................
ASSo-ME:1.N.;-C:.•i�-
....LS.............
..............................`
5.
:
S
S .
OV
13 '.LECT-JVS
��7-
.. ..
.-
_ ..
.. ..
... 1. y a�- a �.. ata:.+•:t.�
1944
CITY OF ORONC
(OPTION 021
OIVISPON--
BUDGET WORK SHEET
-BY OBJECT
AS
OF 10-01-84
PAGE /d
U1 .GENERAL FUND DIV
13 ELECTIONS
OBJECT OESCRSPTION
1984
198S
19tl5
198S
1992
1985
1934
T-T-O
EST
DEPT
MGR
COUNCIL
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
APPROP
35-31-34
ACTUAL
4EOUEST
RECCMMO
AOOPTN.
',P�.:,> ,•;.,;�;t.t�.a� • ••••
TOTAL )THEN CChTAACT SEiV
26
20
SC
20
SC
I
SO
I
SO i
SO I
........
.........................................................................•..ASiiiLLL••...............
.....•.............•
AM
GENERAL LIAI:LITT TNSUR
35-•_-__
........-_..25_I,
' `
.........................................
'I
I
I
..
..............................•
4373
ECUIPPE.'IT FLIAISA S I4SUR
__-.-..21.-- ...............
------
29
29
i
I
I
I
-1BA
••••
iOTAI :'75UntNC'_S
�56
23?
16S
29
I
I
I
T
•--------
....................
A3tl1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRAYEL-M:LiAGE-PtdKTiG
4?
Iv
103
11
7S
..
i
......SJ.........,.:.........`....................
$]
I
SO I
SO i
•••••iCfRl
JTMER .....................`�
ES
.......
.........t.y
.......1j........
75
------- --------------------
.....-
ABSU
.................................
PC�U•.03 •
...-------
.-----••---•-•----•---------_-.......-.....-----•---...-
16
I
I
I
I
..•.•TOTAL
:TrtEt D:S9U�5=rrNT3------------------iM1
•-----.-...........-.......--.-•...-...•I..•......-.........i.•..................
...tN7.NT-_Tr=S. .....:_V•r......
1553 .......+__3333_.•..17152_.-'_.216-.....1322A-..-_�.....I._..3SS0
..._......
I
.....................
01 !Et1E?AL FU40 CV 13 :L:CTJ7NS -IS-
PERSONAL SERVICES
FUNCTION,_._________.FUND_
___ _ _
General_ _ _
DIVISION --Elections
NO. OF _EMPLOYEES _
1984
19851985.......
POSITION TITLh: , _ _ _ _
PRESENT `_PROPOSCD _ _
_ ESTIMATED
_ _ _ _ _ _PROPOSED _ __
_ _ _ APPROVED _
City Clerk
(a)15% 5%
1,992
1,065
1,065
neputy City Clerk
(b)15% 5%
2,873
1,065
1,065
Election Supervision (Pub. Works
2% 2%
685
710
710
Coordinator)
Voting Machine Setup, Take Down 18iirs -0- 200 -0- -0-
& Misc.
TOTALS 5,750 2,840 2,840
No elections in 1985
(a) Resigned 7-31-84
(b) Appointed City Clerk 7-31-84
- 19-
K«
1984 CITY OF ORCNO
-_01. GENERAL FUND
CBJECT JESCRTPTI09
(CPTION 02) DIVISION•- BUDGET YORKSMEET -BY OBJECT AS OF 10-01-84
DIV 14 ASSESSIO
1984 1985 1985 1985
1982 1983 1984 Y-T-O EST OE PT MGR COUACIL
ACTUAL ACTUAL A7;50ROP 05-31-84 ACTUAL REOUEST AlCOMPC AOOPTN.
PACE 20
4100
1984 CITY OF ORCNO
-_01. GENERAL FUND
CBJECT JESCRTPTI09
(CPTION 02) DIVISION•- BUDGET YORKSMEET -BY OBJECT AS OF 10-01-84
DIV 14 ASSESSIO
1984 1985 1985 1985
1982 1983 1984 Y-T-O EST OE PT MGR COUACIL
ACTUAL ACTUAL A7;50ROP 05-31-84 ACTUAL REOUEST AlCOMPC AOOPTN.
PACE 20
4100
SALAAI!S-R!GULAR ENDLOYEE
5789
S415
7509
1R67
5343 I
8230 I
•-----------------
8230
823C
•
I
-------------------
...O..Y..E..-...-..-•.-.•.--•..-...-.......•r.
-uI L-O-E-2 --------------------------------------------------------------
----•--
• e
-------
---5-•I
-6-•-I ---.•...•-T
-4
----------:
----------
IA.TM-------------- --«
..t..1..1..1
.S----------------•t
--.•6.5
...--.-•-....
-------------------------I--------•I----------I---•-----I----••--•
I
- •
-..YMOA..IC.ai.JT.AIO.T
....-.•--905•---....:-•t-^t
N.--?.Pt-lr
-I---------•----
---•.
-ttt1.112-33L.21'
.t .(.otR=.R.O-G)-G .Y.9d.8y.711
..........
.........i
-----•---•------•-6--•---•------------•--I..-..-----!--------
:
--------------
"_ -------•-------
t133
SICK PAt- -9d91..............
211------1j1........----------As-----•---•-I---------:--•------I----------I"_
....
....................
-....-..»..»-.-........•
t)
tl.
- ...............•.--•...........................................................
oE..
a t C3";,. tUT!]Y
t7i
t)9
41s
-.•-.......-.•.•.•.....-....-...........
10
246 1
3S3 I
ISO I
-•------......-
35e
I
-------..---..----- .
-tt.l1.t5•12 ..F�.hI.Ca.AC
.-.•..-...9.......
.:.CT•.:3.1t.:r .2.C:C.T1.:•t:'n.! .:.4:.lUi.irU.;."]..NG
.5-3.6
.•..••..•-..-.).9.3
0 i
O
I
A:r ••
•••••-1.C-.•3
•----------
-375-I
-1S-T•
1295-�--_-12CS
l....-..••-••-•••••••
i1S2--------------- •1;----------------
.-13-•--.---------------
5 .......
S i-------
; --------
1i-i---•-••----•---••--•
t153
•OitKPA'ri CAN°
15 ...--•.tz
.......15..-.-..-•------------------
-•---6�51
-------
`.........t'........`..i....................
-1]51C-----1051:
••••
Tii�l r:FS"t:l-S°pv::C:•--+-'•.v:a
....--•�-•t:251-•----25i1
A
917r
...........................................
1051] _
►.........................
,----_-----•••--•--_-
...................................
421.
:FF::E 'jPFL:t!
..............................
521
314
$53
173
5.E 1
$51 I
sS0 I
SSO
I
.......-.•............-..........»..
......................::...............----..:.........-.-...-.^.:.......
z.•
1 �
1 s
1» I
•.
1c•
1e-...
-I
....
T^•:L•il�Pt::3-y-I'1-yl�-.--••--
szd�-•-•--51`.......
aSV........
tae -----•St3
es]-i-----eS:-I----•eS:-i-------------•----•-
--.•...............-.......---.._.•.-.--------------•------------------•-•-----------•----•-------•-----------------•---.....---------
13231 !
••-i97]'•j----
39701 1
35700 /
-3,7
397:C
-397CC------------------------
I
•••••Tf1:L
in ------------
.--------------------------------
13236•
-
.........
..................................
t12:-T!ll�nj.f�..........................
.......
..........
........i...........
j
.-.--------..--•93n
:
.-....-.:..............................
1351 :
tS21-PO:t:�r
................-.....it�•-.-------
..-----
---------
SS:
700
•.••-TJt=L•C�.INi.•.:C:..Cr.S.._.........y'1...---lilt
-...-..y1
.-..--5;`-....
15S..I..--225]-I•---
.5)-�••--225�.I--------------------
-
- ------------------
t3[2
tRIA1i7� A-'L?�::n:li.......-....9y.....--123
....-'2,0.....--123•--••--123.......1i�.:....-15]
-
...........
-153
-
....................
....
T�TA. 'iC•=u9L::y--.---•---9!
------125.......2]]-------it3
•123
I
1S: j-....15..I
.................
.......
i.
.......................................
RA:t.T ]._ -G..
134
.-.............................................
!
IS
0!1
..
•.•.»i^•Ts�
_'*..:T•v_t;�-°E_A1.............
C.
a........52.......1Su..........-......-125.......�...I...............
-
....-...-------`2:C-.--.--...-•�-••---..
ISO
---------
is-
.......................
1....................
t15:
;MTCs.J:\i isA\::`-...........28571.....21655
- i'`J]
:1 rUY0 04
14 :i3=55:N.
—.ZO—
K
1984 CITY OF ORONO
(OPTION 021
OIVISI+ON-- BUDGET YORKSMEET
-BY OBJECT AC
OF 10-01-84 PAGE .1/ IV
01 GENERAL FUND OIV
14 ASSESSING
,
COACT DESCRIFIICN
1984
1985
1985 1985
1992
1983
1984
Y-T-0
CST
O-PT
NOR COUNCIL
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
AmPRIP
05-31-84
ACTUAL
REOUCST
RECON4C AOOPTN.
+� •�•• TOTAL OTNE► C:ATRACT SCAV
25573
28655
40400
42000 1
I
1 I
.....................
-.........................................
43FU GENERAL LIAM ITT IV•UA
-...........
109
12
......................
125
23
.................................
23 1
1
I 1
................... »...---------------------
6379 INSURANCE tG:A7 5f afCJRD
92
92 1
I
I I
....................................................................................................................................
•••• TOTAL :M4Un1'iCr '
109
12
12S
115
115 1 15 1I
1 1
/. •........ Ai:►NUiSE!IENTS.........35
...........................•.............j.........
......-..i..-.-...-I..-..........-...--.
-... •
••.� toi:.-oi,ai-oioiuilitrc�ii�
ss
1
I
...............-1•....�.�.�.M
e e
........................................................-........---•••---........--------..I....-•--•
TOTAL tN7�9T4 TnIS c:VIS:J•1
M................................................................................................................N..............--
39611
39750
S]656
3S7V
6�513 i
53�1•i
-.............----•-----------
57�10 53�10 I
C1 1EhC:PAL FLYD Ow 14 :SSEW&G _.21—
c'
0
E12
PERSONAL SERVICES
FUNCTION
FUND_ General
DIVISION _
Assessing
NO. OF EMPLOYEES
1984
1985
1985
POSITION TITLE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ PRESENT _ _ _PROPOSLD _ _
_ ESTIMATED
_ _ _ PROPOSED _
APPROVED
_
Assessor
-0- -0-
- -
- -
- -
Ag'sessing Clerk/City Clerk
15% -0-
(a)2,873
- -
- -
Assessing Clerk/Typist
50% 50%
(b)2,470
8,230
8,230
TOTAL
5,343
8,230
0,230
(a) Appointed City Clerk 7-31-84
(b) Hired 9-1-84
-22-
19et CITY OF ORONO
(OPTION 1?2)
DIVISION-- BUDGET VORKSMEET
-BY OBJECT AS
OF 10-01•e4
PACE .?3 '
SENERAL. FUND DIV. IS
t-01
I'
_FIVANCE
CBJECT DESCRIFTICh
19e4
1985
19e5
1985
'
1932
1983
1984
t-T-D
EST
D_PT
NOR
COUNCIL
'
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
APPROP
135-31-e4
ACTUAL
REQUEST
RECOMMO
AOOPTN.
•.�-:,:;;.. 41OU SALAAIES-REGULAR ErPLOYCE
......E:...
iS470
...............5;.........................................I.........1..............................
t7701
$5939
20.36
57300 I
SeteO i
SlfeO I
SeteO i
t111.0VE.lT..........
CROLOY
. ..................................................................................,........,..-................I
31
.12U SALAFtES-TSM? EMPLCY:ES --------90
.....................-........
.....-.2-7...J..----..-..-,-
231
230
S3
..
280 :
�1f0 I
310 I
«. ...
310 I
t.31 VACArlJ:. oAT (�P79S7)
i
[7.1
•-S.3-7 ------------------
.-,---I -----•--•-I
----------I
-......-------------
.tJ2OL)ArPATtPRC.Vei)
•.:.--- ...,..-,..........
253
2707
---.........................................................:....................«.........
..�..._....
.........-:---......1.....,..,i......,..i
4S2
.........
4153 SICK PAT (FOCI 9691
......-........-.....
1435
----------
1061
591
I
I
I
t139 AOMI':IST�ATIvE S:RvlCE
.t]7-
•---3]71------1J7s------2!2L
:
I
I
I
tit. PER:-CITY.C........:......--•-•2.51-•--•
-...
3...
I
--2t75-�_•••Zt7S------
------....................
G1t2 F:C.•C:iT CC'11�:?Vi:'7•J
.....- _ ..
3.7[
_ _
372t
S9?9
1364
t•.19 �------•------------�-_----�-------
i
jgld...........................................
ct
----------------
..0 I
.is1."SP!T:L:1:T:C•) !v.UAA•AC:
" 3S....-.31;7......!1s2......14
�.-....If901..�S
S
.
3•.I
l413 i
3975 !
3975 I
................................................................SJ32]
AtS2 Llft•l;.:uRAA:E
-2L1F- _
.:..Y�
....................-"---.......•--.77.
3221SR
S2Sc:s---------------------------------------------
325 .
325 !
325 I
.153 C.iM.-:M:U.:•.C:.---..........
-, ...........................................
•17s I175
!
175 I
..................srss
.....72.......
..........`...;...az.
...................................
.....T.TA.......v:L-:".....S
••••••••------
....
'54
•...-la
69540 I
6SS40 ;
6954: I
42;Y3FF:CE•.Ui2l:E.i•
1'32••••••12SS
..------�9�--•
-.63.L2-
142S l-•--15•i)-1•---IS??-J
--1SC: •--------------------
I
ttt� !J:R. {id�!1J::LS...........--�22.......1.T•--....-5.-----...;�.....--t0?
...... - -
..--;5.......-..,:.
:
2 I
12S
....................
--t21 2
.... ro-a�v-�'F------i1s:-----
rcLsJ�s.�::_:j
....... ..........16.......S�S
iiz-•----1:s--------s
a
_--------
S
65------
2
6-----------------------
.32,-•EIE=N?'1:......
......625•_--•-•111.-..-..6Ss•.•_--.,7S.I....-675
!
----------------------
.........................612-------5�........y1^............-•SSJ•I•.--•675•1-....675••.....675
......................
.•.. TC•:L .
C.:1Ml•C.T:J'1:
.-___...-.....- ....-.,'S2s........`S..-.-..?LS-----------------=C?
I: td
-----
11cS
1225
" - "--•----1SSJ
537
12dS
-- -----
•------------------------•
1359 :
--
1!5= !
.3[2•=A:nTIv. t=lBllCn;•�y
...-......,-....-.................................
........2.]
- .-...1J].i.....ICJ
•
I.-..,2C�
•------•-------------
I
•••• T^.T:L ??.91lhG•�U9lI::•-:]
i2s
.S
•-----125
.................
�
..
2......
•.'
2J)--•! -------
.,2^?.......
20. •_c--I -••---..-.-..-------
E.U:'M'Vt-----------
.................................................................................i...
--------1;-
--------
:D-------
---••2i
---------
!
,--------
273 •
,.„
-- ..---,---•-,.----►.
27CI
.... TOTA, 14-REPiI
EC,ATAA:T r: 1
_
---------------------------
--••----•--31�1------2I'+e
S9
1vt
12s
--
49
1 SJ
.............................................
27] :
270 I
27C I
4J52`:C1:S-:7YIA ;i=v:C:
... ..................: .........0........
....................
5112-
-•-1]S/•---,-311i
I--
S.1S--
3315------3315--,••••••,,•••••••,•••
I
:. ..:
1
.
S
75 I
-
1J3 I
.................................
109 :
1.7 I
Cl .:HEo.L FUND Dv
is F;N:Y-E
2 3 —
1984
CITY Of ORCNO
(OPTION 021
DIVISION-- BUDGET YORKSKE T
-BY CLIJECT AS
OF 10-01-84 PACE AA/
01 GENERAL
FUND
DIV 15 FINAW E
CBJECT
DESCRIPTION
1984
1985
1985
1985
1982
1963
1984
Y-T-O
EST
DEPT
MGR
COUNCIL
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
APPROO
05-31-34
ACTUAL
REQUEST
RECOMNQ
_
ADOPTN.
4354
LOCIS-CLASS 2 ASSESSREYT
2300
2300
2S3J
253:
2530 I
4001) I
4000 I
4000 I
....................................
%55S
DATA'PR".;.CSSiNG
...................................................................................••-----»-
8394
96U6
9433
3357
9650� 1
1029) 1
19290 I
10290 I
.-....................
......................
••••
—--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL CATA PAOCEM NS
13592
14773
15292
6962
15565 :
177)S I
177C5 T
17705 I
t1Sl•N:E:INdS-C•]NF-SCh0015
------_•-•259
-------
ti9 ••----20)
-------
115-_-^---7tS-.
----
25)-.__---250_I-----2SC
I---•-•--------------
-.........
-•••
.........................................................................................................-........---------
TOTAL )TMER CONTRACT SCAV
259
149
200
115
24S 1
2S) I
2SO I
250 I
t370
.......•.....-_-__-------_-S
�.IAE:L:TtTN.
252
......_----•--•__
2C6
------------_I--_------I
19S
1
17J
------I--_-----_
170
4J?4
AUT3MOT:vi I1I3LR3NCE
..................................................
11
10
33
............---.-_-----.-----.----..---._--------.
33
33 I
30
30 1
t17S-90Y
--.....................
C
..-t.-.--..
---------
.))
-..........9.
--------
.. .....-....-------
2
S.-
--- --I --------------------
AS75
.........................................-....-.-...-..-....-......-........._....-..-...--.....................
NO'I:TS a SFCUA;'r
27
117
15C
SS
35 :
t) I
i9
a0 I
i379
I4.."U=3•.CC tiE4T-1F a.:0=0
-------------------------------------
151-.-....151-:-.-.-I*?*5
------
17S•I._...17S
---------------- .------
.•_•.•.• ..T.0
.T.:.� ._I'.:.i.L.n................7..
"I'
-------
...- -------
•_--•-.6
11
;;;--1
6t0 I
i!:
............................�5..................-----------------------------.--------
h:rCERih:�S
,
��
31)
_
....................
t3b1-TRl9:L'AiLFA•i:•rioK:4----------*............i........9))_•-_•----i...-•-•3S0•I-----Q;i-i----•-------••-
-- ------••----•---------
........_......_._.....................
i399
........_.........-..
CT1•Ei CtSP.EES
......................_......................-_..............................................
21
25
25
25 :
25 :
25 I
25 I
••••
..................t.........:.
T9TS� ,iTh:4 Cr:i�E4
il
------
7.5
.:+i-....-....--.-.-............-_.._.....-...-...-.....--------------------
1.^
2�3
iSS I
1�)S I
1�CS
1JJS i
.. ...
tSt�
..............................................................................................................................
;fF I: i fURfri2 f1-E07:P
I
I
..................................................
••••
.--._.-.
fOTi� C+oITAL JU'l3Y
.....................-------
...........«..._--.........
............
...
-----------------
...-............_
-35?12
....
....
I .--------•--
�
..........._.......
I—---.-.«
........ ----------- -
I
T9T:L
Ai1i�NT) TnlS ::VI5:34
75tt4
R�629
!b91�!
025l5 I
92585 I
... -------------------
92S1S I
01 3EhE AEI FU%D DV 15 ::H44CE —3q—
PERSONAL SERVICES
PUNCTION
FUND_ General
DIVISION
Finance
NO. OF _EMPLOYEES
_ _ _ _
_ _ _1984 _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _1985 _ _ _ _ __
1985
_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _
POSITION TITLE _ _ _ _ . _ _
PRESENT
_ _ .PROPOSED __
_ _ESTIMATED
._ _ _PROPOSED _ ___
_ _ APPROVED _
Finance Director/Treasurer
1
1
32,120
33,405
33,405
Deputy Treasurer/Dep City Clerk/
75%
65%
14,890
13,815
13,815
Office Coordinator
Accounting Clerk
55%
55%
9,330
9,900
9,900
Deputy City Clerk/City Clerk
5%
5%
960
1,060
1,060
(Typist)
'rOTAT,
Te,nporary Part-time Clerical 10% 10%
57,300
280
58,180
310
58,180
3' 8
_25_
�~%.iµrSC 'r •7li
� "�'•
.
•r 'ti'
..
,y,. �,
i�
•r,•. } .y7 -. -' t �*.,.:r
1984 CITY OF CAC110
COPY ION 1021
DIVISION•-
BUDGET VORKSMEET -BY OBJECT AS
OF 10-01-84
PAGEi6
L agNtRAL FUgO .. - -
0I Y .16 -LEGAL
1!�'''
OBJECT DESCRIFTIJN
1984
1985
1985
1985
---
- -_
1042
1983
1984
Y-T-O
EST
OEPT
MGR
COUNCIL
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
APPRJP
05-31-84
ACTUAL
REOU_ST
RECCNMO
AOOPTN. - -
,�:^ 43U1 LEGAL-RETAIAER
1569
9985
9500
2770
'�;COC 1
10500 I
10500 I
10500 1
-................ .............
.....................-.-...._.....-...------�•-
-232L6
--..._--...------•------------
.-.....-•..--.�-...
ASII2 LEGAL -COURT AF?EARA.4.ES
..............._..._..........
.
................................................................................................
31567
23GJ0
9177
28L00 I
3J:0) i
30000 I
50000 I
4303 LEGAL-CCNSULTI.%+ SERVICES
......................................................................................................................................
7461
14215
12503
3625
12500 1
1300. I
13000 1
«..-.
MOD I
• •• IOTA, PAOFESSi:`1LL SERVIC
39275
---------------------------------
SSW
5:030
15'72
$3503 T
53S00 I
S•_SOO I
MOD I
AStt PRthTING !; PUBLI:h:VO----
.............•----------.--.----------------*----I---.-----I------50-•------SO
...."--...-.-`O-I.--.-.5�.:....«so.i......SO.I--.-------.-.-------
...• TCitl•?R:hTIh4-?UBLiSM-AO-•
..............................................................................•-...-..............................-...--------------
43
i...----------.......
A3St JA:I Cti:R;ZS
1Siot
12^ll
19))I
-....�A16-....16200.1
5476
1620u
1750• I
17SC0 I
17SOC I
•••• TCT6L JTMIR COITAACT.SCRV
....................................................................................................................................
13494.....1SL/►...--t+)00
-•1710)
I--_11SC0
I
MOD i ••••-•--•-----•-•.
TOTAL A40JNTS Tn:a 3:VIS:311
...................................................................................................................................
52►69
67714
SM3
19/.6!
6674C I
71050 :
71350 :
71050 I
Cl GENCO.L FCPtO OV 16 LEGAL -.,R6—
1954
CITY OF ORONO (OPTION 021
OIVISI.ON--
BUDGET YORKSNEET -al OBJECT
AS
OF 10-01.84 PA cc *17
01�GENERAL FUND DIV
17 G9VERNMENT_BUILDINGS__
_
_^ __�
_
- __
_•
_„_�
_, _ •_• _
-
!'EJECT OESCRIFTICN
1984
1985
1985
1985
1982
1983
1984
Y-T-1)
EST
OS PT
M8R
COUACIL
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
APPROP
05-S1-84
ACTUAL
REQUEST
R;COMMC
AOOPTN.
LIDO
SALAnICS-RE6t1LAR EMPLOYEE
7249
Stt2
15924
2065
11963 I
11400
1
11400 1
11400 I
----------
.................
. 4111
....................r......-r.....rr--..-rr.---r........r.r..»-•------------........----...-•----..........
OVCATiu:-RESULAA EMPLOYEE
103
20Q
I
I
-------------.-------..-.-«
I
I
.«... «....
...........
tf I
................-..._...r-.....r...------•------.-..-.-.-..-----------.-.-.----
YACATI�.7 Pit 1°aJv 9tl71
179
I
I
I
I
...
....I...............
t132.1.OLiJAT
PAY-1a�0; Ydl1...........
.•-----------
.....--.-r-..--.-ei......------.....-.-.I-..-r.----1-
.............. »..--
------------
til3
SICK 1c----919t-------------------------------------r......23.-.........
---------1-3-------
........._..................
..S..�. ..........
------
......
1
..I ------------ -.'--.-.-«-
.i.l.t.t ..P.E.R.+.•.C.I.T.Y
..C.O.Y.f.e.2.4.U.T.:.0.Y.---------
t7t......r.].2.1......
62
t.8.S.:
G.8r5
.....................................................................................................:.........................
4142
FIC:-CITY C)-.TwIBUT:OV
493
392
719
144
767 I
83'
1
8CS
80S I
«.
............
4153
`I.........................a.....
.CGM
.......`.........._.._........:.........i....................................
•••-•_-••--
-1269t,
•••••Trial
r'c?S�t�tu Sriv::%: •-•r•-y2t9-- -
•6179-----1�S61-'----26^�_----12:61-I---'Z69i
I......-•
I.- 1i690 I
...........................................
»......-r_......_....
4231
.................................................................
a 0S L .;JLnSS -5R SUPPLY 2125
116.
15G7 149
ISGO :
15:? I 15CO I 1SOC :
IZ32
EOU:PM:NT 7:?T: S .:CCES
]7
---------------
273
21
21 I
I
I
r.....................................r...-...-...
r..rr.r......-.
•.-... -r...............
---------------...--
------------------- «....
••••
T?i a SUP�L::i-1t::1-°E°;I
'16S
13t^
ISi� 17^,
IS21
15):
1SC0
1S:C I
.......-.........r..-.........r..r
cSJ]
LEGaI-C:.�SuITIaJ SEavI:C:
...............
...................................................................................
S!
_
I
I
tS::S.L-1----
-----C:------ -- -------------------•Ali
132
--
--- •--------------r---------j.-.-..--•;--•------:.-----------------------------
.-..
tSJ6;..:.:..........•
.............1.71...........................---.r...r...............:........................I........
..
....
......
..................Vi:
TOT.
..............................................r................:.................a........
6
--
-;;--;^.I--------------------
13Z4
�T:L:i:ti....................--�ttS......'11
....
. .......tStt
•11::D I--
11:)'--I-
11Ccc 2
....-i)-3L
uf:l:1:E'---------------7i'3-
-•7-51*1"
-71)OJ......`)21-----11._?-:..-11)D).i...11CC-0
--
a-...:
........................................
11u'el C :.-.---------------.-
-----
tSS
�1----'•;.•°:�ITtL•-----------
s
-.
--- *-----..-..-.----
t
LS32
!fF::i .:?•oI:LC:-.;•nU1T.L---'--.9..---....,1'....---tY......--12i
-------
1z'.-.-.--12]-I
------
12J-:-----120
I--------------------
.........:..............................................
..1......................_...............
121
........................I
....
.I.........:
12C
.......................«....
120
......................................
1
.A42'14a:17
".SC E a :°iE4T
1e1,7
1?5
5.3
...................
S.S
293
I
200 1
2CC I
tit]'rA;ST
9LCG5 t ;---- 5--------_--
--------- -.
2366•-•--'.'JJ••----129�---------------
11225
I-
..
-11225-I---1122S-I----------------•--_
....... ........
t:t9
Ja::T^.:.L ,:7Y............-`�Iv...__•t719_.--+-5ri:
J;'
-
- ISSt.......:.............I
I....................
..1;
...•
....._-»_-....................................r....-----------------...------..........r...................................
TOT;L CC.Tia;T vs:1-P�ii:
9547
9662
12175
3353
12533 1
1592S
1
IMS I
16925 1
1.1 r,_NCa:L `V%C CV
17 4?V:*'INSMT
EUIMNGS
—.27-
• :.+• i
•
J
ON BUDGET YORKSNL �
-B' 'gJECT
AS
Of 10.01•b4 PACE �8
1984 CITY 9F ORCNO tOPTION
_ DIY.17_.iOV:RNNENT eglLoING5
01 f UM6 -- -- _ -- — •-
-• _—
-
•6ENER$L _ ..- - -
1�ibG
1985
198$
1985
COACT CESCRIPTt9N 1982 1913 103%;
-T-O
OEPT
REOUSST
NCR
RECONNO
COUNCIL
AOOPTN.
- ACTUAL ACTUAL AY%A'dO
Li-31-b4
ACTUAL
12 1S0
GE'1=AAL LIIE:LTV IAUR 142
2T
........................................
21 I
t
I
... .•-.._--__-.-.----••
— ..... -............................ .--...._-._--••_-..•._._..__.
393 817 $60
464.
464 t
'
53 IGS7U
...... ••••- ••--- _------
G371 PRJPERTT tASUR.NCE ._----._....._-----_-_----•....
......_7
17S
17s I
..t-N-s.u_R-------- 1"SO ?Go
.:..R ..A ..-r.-I•c-_-N--I_.N-..
..G.J...7..2.
1s
ISO I
.7.
I
-------I--__----''•---•----'-
........
.F-.--- --•... ...
.E.v..T..-rT
t
1
...e..o..:.,.
4]
UPEY
..-
.................GS7]
.........•-'
...................
....I..r__$..0....................
115_I..-...__
G377UMOnELL6 LT.....................
_-__-....
-••••••--_•_..
75
...- _.-.__..•....._-..
....................
75
I
S S
.-----_-
•
1_•-T.-'l.0>...:.
0:pr
.
__.••••
905 I
............... ............... ....-.-_.-.-;-L-;--------------------7-�-
913
7J3
37
933
I
900 I
!SIbis
T9ri5Ci n.0 ....................----..._............._......................
........3.J
.........
---...-_._.....•-._.-
'.
It?
79
...•-I--•..-.._.»..._._...._...... .
L1_........_....--_-
'-...
-'7_-•_•-_-...I.-----•--•_-_
.AG..1.3.7.6.C3.
-AS.'EICS•f__............IOSu
.... TOTAL JYME° .1--;ES
t9
II
.............
......................-------........................_..._........_.....
a•'a V F:CE•FURh-FI•T-']U:P -• .....164 914 .........
..................
........---......_...........t.........t..._...._I.......................
•..............3SOS
7�G....._............................................................._.__
a•eL STh:i-_9UI°r:hl
.....
_ -
-Ih72
I
.• 1CTl...............................................................
L.PSTIL ''J'Lwr..
"+
..........»...
...
.... ...... ...• . .........
••••- •IA9Sh •31557 •33205
,.w..w..
•_ ....
I?1766
.....t........i
.`313s
I
..
�3135-'
...........................
•G311S I
..._.
31266
1719�
........
....L...J..1T..I.......ITS.............................................._.........._..............-.._....................-...
11 :_nERAL .-U%3 OV .7 G7v_R•1Ni1.T - ILS—
fr
1984 CITY OF ORCNO
!OPTION 021
DIVISION•-
BUDGET YORKSME£T
-BY OBJECT
AS
OF 10-01-84 PAGE .28
_01_.GENERAL_FUNO
-
OIV-1? 3OVERNNENT BUILDINGS ___-,
_-�- ---
-^---_•_--�----�-----
-----__-- Y•._.___.
CBJECT Cr-CRIPTION
1984
1985
1965
1985
1982
1913
1984
Y-T-O
CST
0£PT
"GA
COUNCIL
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
APPROP
05-31-84
ACTUAL
REQUEST
RECONNO
AOOPTN.
.
Gd'tEp. . L!99:L/TY tHSUR
.....................................................................................................................................
142_
IAM
4371 PROPdRTT INSURANCE
393
910
560
464 •
464 I
53S
..
t
S35
1
53S I
-•-..........-.
....................................................................._..............................................
W 2 BOIL=R A PACHINERY INSUR
133
760
2C0
1S0
ISO t
175
I
175
!
175 I
...................................................................................................................................
4ST3 EOU:PPExT FLCAM S !-ISUR
1 .---....I.
----
..-_1-.-__.-'-t_---
-------.---.----
............... ...... .............-..---------
4377 Uy0hCLlA LIid:ItTT IVSU►.
-43-- ----.--.---.----------.--.-.
I
115
•1
115
I
115 (
417S.I'ISUd1?ICi-IG".NT.'.F.R-CO
65
.---1..-.--�s-1.-.-.
7S-S
..-
-----
-751 -----------------
-.
---------
•••• TOTe� 1NiURAMi.:S
---------------...-....
b9S
16tS
-------
V1)
.00
-------
90U
I
90�-I
..----------•----------•-----•-----------•----•-----•---•-----------------•-------------------------•`----------------•
4Sd3•IIC:VSfS.:-TA..................10l.......1.
•... TOTCL ]*yEP Cr.P;£S
`?5;
---....-----•----11a.......179__.........I...................I....................
1G`:
1r;
179 !
I
2
.... -....................
......-.........-.-...-.-....--...............-....
4)4...ff:CE.FURA.FI_T:£9U.P..........16G......_9)4...
.......................................................
....--•--------------'-----1-...-----1------------.---------------------------
456� )...
SSO11
7pt
............:-....(
1
I
......N1
•... iCT...C-P(Tf '�.t.-...-.....3l72•
16'1...............................j
....
.. .-..-.......
....... ..............-.
................._..............................................................................
T)TAL A�]s•:" iri: `S!01
.......... .. .........................................................
S4V39
33SS9
35264
17179
...........................
38766
43135
(
4]13S
...............................
471lS
01-ENERAL FUkJ OW 17 G)V£R'I4!4T FU:LO:V,S -- ;Ls —
yimcPION_. __--
FUND_ General
DIVISION-
Gov't Buildings
N0._ OF k: _EMPLOYEES ______
_ _ _1984 _-__
. _ . _ . _ _1985 _ _ ___
1985
POSITION TITLE ____________.,_.__
PRESENT__ PROPOSED_,_
ESTIMATED__.__
PROPOSED_
APPROVED
Public Works Coordinator
7% 7%
2,390
2,490
2,490
Foreman
5% 5%
1,360
1,415
1,415
Heavy
Equipment Operator
5% 5% 1,200
1,245
Light
Equipment Operator
3 @ 5% 3 @ 5% 3,230
3,360
Senior
Maintenance
15% 15% 2,780
2,890
TOTAL
10,963 11,400
1,245
3,360
2,890
11,400
-29-
1984 CITY OF OR0140 /JPTIPN 02) DIVISION- BUDGET 1104KSPEET -BY 08JfCT AS OF 10-01-94 PACE j o
Cl GENERAL FUND DIV 21 MU:lAN RIGHTS
CBJECT DES--R:PTION 1984 1965 /985 1985-
1982 1983 1084 Y-T-O SST DEPT NOR COUNCIL
ACTUAL ACTUAL A?PRJP 05-31-84 ACTUAL REGU=ST n,CJMKC AOOPTN.
4385 001.TIC-AS 3355 3626 iSJi 2639 4524 1 ..AI......A..N..OJ....II..T..S ....T..�..Z..S ....C..:..Y..I..S..I.G.N ...........3..3...S..S ..............3.6...2.6.............i....S..�.i .......26..3.9 .....-.i.5.2..i....t ..........s5.9v.z2.66 I
..5926 ..I .....$
.9.2.6 ..I
.••• TOTAL OTHtR C►*4091 7710 7616 ilOi 1479 6916 I .79
...
..................
.........-
........-....'.".'
921 592i................................................................................................ N.................................
Cl %;CN!P:L FURC OV 11 IUMAN RIG-TS 3 D —
%,
1984 CITY OF ORENO WYNN 021 DIVISION•- BUDGET HORXSNEET -BY OBJECT AS OF 10-01-84
�l
___01 GENENAL FUND _ _ ._ DIV 31 POLICE ?4OTECTI.ON
PAGE 3/
CBJiCT JESCRIPTICN
1984
1985
1985
1985
1982
1983
1984
Y-T-O
EST
DEPT
NGR
COUNCIL
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
A°PROP
75-31-R4
ACTUAL
eEOUCST
RECC9MC
ADOPTN.
r'• 4106
SALARIES-REGULtR EMPLOYEE
30S556
336SZ6
39i337
131227
391395 T
412800 I
412500 !
4128CG I
tltl
...•........•-•.•---------------------•
JVEP.TIME-REuLLAR EYPLCYfE--•••1'_�J!••_--191e2
-------------•---•-----------------------------------------------------
1+707•••---0^26_•---16?07-I
- 18J::- I
-1f000-----
I
-- ----------•---------
000 I
i12L
SLLLg2_5•T:•? EMOLf:Y:ES
..........
39
...•------
2610
SS
330 I
I
-- ---------- •---------
I
1121-OVEPfIM:
..........
TEPr Eh�L^YEES
..................................................._........---------------•---......-ID00
`•...._.-----------------
...----I-----•-•-T-------------------i--------------------
a13u
-............................................-..-•----•-•--------.-...-...---••--•-------......•...-•.----..---..--------•---------
:;EVEncrICE �Ar
2c79
61�1
570=
SJ]] !
--
----- I --- •----------------
t131
vAr,,TI)N F.r (-A•+G 9671
14h1t
15623
tt76
I
I
I
I
a132•MOL:]41-PIT
(PpO:
------------
..9s.9.V.1edl--------13'52-----1-7-S-l-a
------
----.-.-......-..--..-.-.-.a-.t3.6.t
•..--.-.-.
0-.I ---
-I-------I
LI
----I --------------------
80
1:7I.......
..........................•------.............1...•--...........
63-v
........
..!...........---.....
--------- .--- — ----
at3S:•1.Lir
Acr (:
.
... -------------------I----------.---------
3.1
a136•:tF:e-
...................
.Y(PnO.-Yvdl............3lS...._--9SS
........•--•..........--------..........-
..-.......
..-..-.;;•..-.-...----•-----..i.................--
*
--------------------
I
alit
aE;a CITr C71TniaUT:1V .'-_-•-SC411
a7dS7
--- •-
a1ST1
1- ---
-----•.12
1S7'11
--..•..........I..........._..............................
a9227
stsu .
51537
SI530 I
tltt
..........................•......................_.....
s:C----- r------ :!!7'i7--
1---------
5--......S..--
11-65
1763 I
/760 •
----------•--------•••
1793 I
US1
rrOSr,TLL:1sl:t1 ;tliL'iA�:E
tS;vS
2i;aL
-,
237d3
---...•..-...........
FS55
2SaSC. :
237Si i
2!7SD :
23750 !
t1St
LIf: I'rL�sACE
S11
6iJ
Sat
7T?
663 I
669
66C I
....;;.•^....�zs:a..........•--..
...•.......................
A1S3-•^4Avlli
.......................
COMA-:�iV�:.SCi.
2+1
�S
21571
21110 !
t137J I
............
.........................................
...
:::...........................................
i•••
TCT� i�4 Jr--RS1•ISL t:C-*
a17L1]
47836T
t11Z6h
1!7346
s wn .
-mavxx---.-----------------
5l 14) I
S47650 I
5476 0
A21C
.... E ........
.... .................................................................
S.
1916
S•o5: I
J2 t
320C t
....................
32CC 1
.. ...v
a[2:
'L. ...................
•-T.+ _LS t-LU94::s�ti
...............
11.7aa
..
-21:V1-----?:;Ji------�hTc--
--2Si:- •••
.Z:ia- .------
2S]:7-.---25:CC----2S.Ct•. •-• •-•••••--•
a[21-CL+'�I•!i
t :iSJrAL :
................iS1.................._;.
-•e"JACS
.11. tt6'......`.........117+...........:......�............2
6: I
-
....... ....................
1131
ErLCm tati-SUP-20
.....--•t�52
........]..
2 ...._.....I.........:....•..
....
-.I..............-...--
423...��:�+.A7
%S:T:-t L::._
....t.S630:.)...-..1,,2
.......
...--10;)-.-
--56];-i--
--
'.oCJ-f
36:G.i......•.- ..........
ct<u•aO:rf:
r,_:EPT/J.........._-.._•_.lt].....- ............................
-/:;-.-..----;-------;..
eS'-I------5]
...eS.--------------------
4.141
iFt::II�S SU°=L:_.
-
914
--
1hZ/
1SJ:
')--
......................................................
-----t--......
la:
--
.....
1
11
••••-TCT•-
----- -
SSL91-..._17i51-..--):TS0--
---------
*- -- --'
----
- 16l1j.....19152--...;]15)-I...`
:ISO -•---`015]•--------------•.•-
alul
_...........................
LE64L- Air-------?_----
SZitYI
................................•---....................._...............I........
.._.._;:.....-------I----.�J1------
-----------------------------------
I ---------------------
;1 :EbE'Ll
FLN6 Ov
31 DOLIC"
P:t-.7'CTTO'1
-31—
1984 CITY Of OROVO
01 GENERAL FUND
COACT CESC...PTION
!OPTION 021 DIVISION•- BUDGET YORKSMEET -BY OBJECT AS Of 10-01-84 PACE 3,1L
OIV 31 POLICE PROTECTION
1984 198S 1985 1985
1982 1983 1084 Y-T-D :ST DEPT RC1 COUNCIL
ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 15-31-84 ACTUAL ACQU:ST RECCRMO AOOPTN.
4306
CITME4 C)93ULTM. SCRVIC:S
2l67
2991
4000
2322
SGOO I
SOO) I
5•300 1
SDOO
I
................................................•--•_-_-••_-_..._._-_.._.._...-__--•-_---•......------......-------•----------------
••••
iOTSL PROFESSI)!1AL SERVIC
4913
3367
tiJ90
2SC2
770C i
7J:0 I
7900 I
7000
I
...................................................................................................................................
4!2U
TELCOMOIE
3197
3C47
6230
2134
6230 :
62OG I
6200 I
6200
I
..............
4321
......................................................................................................................
POSTAGE
731
1129
1100
46:.
1100 I
1100 I
1100
1100
1
-_......Ts.I
........................•--_.H_3......._..
3
..--..._........
_..K ------
.30.------
.............-.:.-.......-
..._-..-------------
.
..t•t..S3•..l2•..t2•
-1JC.------
•-0-7 -------
------
...•---..........o-a
...--..-.---.-...
- ..____I.^2_.-___
TOTALP.41hTIA;-OUSLISM-lD
�
..--._
113S
_-__.__-_-__-
11C:
571
-
1300 :
-
2002 I
2CC0 I
2000
t....•.••.-..
...UP..RT..:T.L.h..:T..T:..:A.:.L
..........._»..•
..4 ..A ....P..UB....I..IC..-.h..I'..1..,...-.-•..•._.--.--
........•---•-75-•_----.50C-•-_•_••-•-•-•_--60--...--
S
2
S
23
-----
0.
7------------
203 I
27CO
-------•-...-.-.•-..--•-
—------ -
I
••••
TOTAL Li:LiT:E^
-------
•i3
27l/..----..-.
2..60
-_il -------
1^
2.60-2 7--.-........_....-.:....^.-..._--.-------.--------
270J I
2700
27C0
1
-............__--___...._...._...
tS3:
isO!•: .tStiT.a
.......3Y28 .......
3...�1c .......t
.4._10 ----------------
t67)
57O^ •
.......
5709
S7C�:
......................
I
LS31
zCL':�r_AT • MA: i:'iTsl.....
........--------------------
.
------------------
.i•---..-..I-...._...:-....-.........................
tS32
Cff:..-C? 9L:L=:•.G ;:•tT:---
---•---'------
--------
2tt-__-•-c11t------�25U--_••
32S)-••••72S'J---•••82S]•-•_••••-•-••--•---•••
••••'TOTsI
hCiT.................•••
...-•---1
. ......
-t.....
---•t11L--•--1.......
1395)..................
1395------------------------
tSt.•yA;•;T-:f-:--
----
:-*... ..•.••...--115-----.
-----•••_Idu]
.•----[1S
.......
*------------------
3:00».---------i-----.--....--------
rs:•.T ---- ........................................................
iCU:crEkT
.:9:
.--------
I -
.............
.
............... ......
tStL
KA;.i-M:St i7u:ov°y..............._........._...........-............................-"
•LJGS
35
..
t7
. .......................
1
I
-----
ou
----------- -----------------
Y
- -
11)I
110J.I4;;3•
....................
Ai.TCi.�I
-t- -----
-------•----------------------7J-._----2700
1.,
094
-----------??CC---
:.-...------•--------
....•TOT.�•.•:lT.;:;1
'islY'=EGa:------
�3155-....1`I6.------
1i. ] .....125t---------------
•-•1.°�^-.---163�L-j--------------
._»..
tSSS
:1=?T.A�;•.:.........................................
....................31..
......;.............)»---------------C107
......
t3........................
... .•Tj•.•
�•r.. _•i-:Cti-'AC 1•S•:;V ••
itS1.....-11?5
.----
—1K....
..;---------
tt;---------
«i'r I
t! --.
'td :i;
I--------------------
it1.
..... ..........
•...LIT• •
.E'.i:L
.....-•1�[
........
..............
..:.........
170J
.....
•.....��`..�....................
7)0
..........._.-.._-
. ------------
1J5
tJJ ;
13S I
1Q5 ;
1•:S
I
tSISECLI'/"`.1•FII:T•..S.i'11,1
..........
17L--------
:77.......
175-------
.;,1......
*-------
. •175-. -
- 17; ......175-.-------------
-------
tSlt
:u1:.rC':�C.......-.5:`;
..---'
....-57:1------
SLed
4 ••
S2JC-_••--31J:-:•---}7CJ».
37JG
—....................
;1
f LNC JV
31 -:L:C-
u2nTr-:T:3tl
— -"Q —
.•fir+- :..
1934 CITY OF ORONO
• is
_01_,.SENERAL FUND_ .
OBJECT CESCRIPTION
(OPTION 021 DIVISION•- BUDGET YORKSNE£T -BY OBJECT AS Of 10-01-54
OIV..31_ POLICE- PROIECTN
1982 1523 1944 T-T-O
ACTUAL ACTUAL A?PROP OS-31-84
1984 1985 1985 1985
EST DEPT NGR COU K IL
ACTUAL REQUEST RECOMMO AOOPTA.
PAGE 33
4311 80110; : h3URANC.
SO
...•---..
..................
—-------------- ------
�,..,..:.................................................................................
4377 UMBRELLA LIABILITY TNSUA
70
700 I
703
700
?00
I
..............---•-_........-...................._».-..-..--------------------------------------------------------------------------
4175 I'ISUAA:&C� A6E%T OF MiCORO
111)
111J I
111) :
1110 i
Ilia
I
----------------
....-.-• -•-•------•----•-----------•-•----------••-------....-
TOTSL IAaUAtNCfS
6347
5979
--_-•-_----•-••------------•---••---•-------------•---
SiBa
6S
....
6240 1
.... .------
7493 1
_....... .
7490 !
-----------
749a
o... ........................
I
7S7
.... .. -
I
.............
I
.. --------------
i
--
I
....................
...........................
4551 TRAVEL-M:LEA6E-?14KI-IG
...
634
m..
SJ6
S2S
14
10) I
651 I
1%50 1
65.,
1
iS62 MC ET:A.•£Ati45I5................5^.....»...y................-.41........�?-i....-
...I.........i....-.•-
---
i....................
.....................................................................
t3S3 I:CEhSES s 1 » zS
23
1st
77
!?
9. I
1)_ I
100
1CC
.------------
I
........ .------
.-............-.-..............................;._...................
4 E...».........13t6...-----`-----..1645----------------vS-.--.._1SS--I----1SS9------13S.-I-----
-----------------------------------
Shm
......------.
iSLu P.UILOi'IuT iTa�CTUtdS
4S9C
4427
443i.
i
'
4541: CFF:;E FuR►.-FI►•.EJUIo. .......1791
.....23J2
...-•1450
...-.IS....-._.1S1.......1J44.2-.-.1684.1....1684
1--------------------
1,; r
2
277C^
1
456%. ITH:�•:JUIcYE'.1 ..........-.....21"1
....325,.....
------
.;..
........-..._......_..................................
•••• fOT:. C+%I1:L C�1'L•r
1v?S1
2075t
.-.........1iS......34t=.1....5?1S.I....d215_-....8215................-.....
'.:!SJ
3715
3343� :
375v9 S
37599
37599
t.iu-•E'��JS�t.=i:►iWkit: NTf.......319J
.......�9.....................................
..............t...-....
_ ---------------
. . .»...... •... TCTIL :rH_: 1: MJRS:MEVTY
1193
49
.....................................................-..-------....---•-•---•---..-................................................-.
TCTtL AMJ4YT: Tnt; J:VISIJV
$16594
504133
64o2S3
?66617
e%4ld2 :
6089J4 :
684929
6989d9
I
'71 )_4E':L FUka OV 3I o•3L:CE 0A'MC'T3% —33
PERSONAr. SERVICES
FUNCTION
FUND General
DIVISION
Police
NO. OF
EMPLOYEES
1984
1985
1985
POSITION TITLE ------------------
PRESENT
PROPOSED
ESTIMATED
PROPOSED
APPROVED
Chief
1
1
36,770
38,240
38,240
Aset. Chief
1
1
29,735
30,925
30,925
Sergeant
1
1
28,410
29,545
29,545
Patrolmen
10
10
275,568
288,920
288,920
Secretary - Full-time
1
1
15,662
16,540
16,540
Secretary - Part-time
1
1
5,257
8,630
8,630
TOTAL 391,395
Secretary -Temp. 1 L7 300
Capital Outlay 1985
Objec,: #4540 - Lockers, typing stand, secy chair, folding chairs,
camera, resuscitator
Object• #4550 - Three (3) new squads net of two squads sold
Object #4560 - Radar units (2), barrier vests (2), word processor
w/access -34-
412,800 412,800
-0- -0-
1,684 1,684
27,700 27,700
8,215 8,215
I
r
. .n�,.-. +,n .•.�:. •• �+�r�rt :?•w'*'ZI- _. i• •�:y.ie••i..!�w4'a'i•f..•.v.a.. '.i'•.W'.
1"4 CITY OF ORONO 'IOPTION 011 O!YISION•- BUDGET YOAKSMEET -BY OQJECT '' AS OF 10-01-44 IAaE.9i�'"
01 G_E_NE_PAL FURO DIV
32 FIRE
►ROTECTIO4
-
_ - . _
�O
2 COACT OESCRIFTION
1914
1995
1935
1985
a,
1982
1983
1484
TAT-0
EST
OE PT
M6R
_COUNCIL -
i
ACTUAL---
__
ACTUAL,"
_
APPROP
OS-31•ii—
rkCTUAI
__
REQUEST
RECOMMO
ADOPTN.
_M LOr�E
�+ 41OU SALARIES-RCGULAR _ o
�i
102
100 I
I
I
'
I
PERA:C=iT_COYTaIBUTIOH........------
----4141
4142 FICA-C17Y CCNTAIBUTIJN
S
..............-_-------_------------.-S-I...--.-.-r-------.-I--------..I--..---------.....-.
7
7 I
I
---.........------..-.--..-------------•-
=
I
----•---••--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
•••• TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
b3
115
112 I
-...---..-..-.......----------..--
I
I
I
----..-.-----.-.
-.........d
.i.3.1.S ..F.I.R........--.V......
E E
...._-•----.-..-......-....-:-....-.ti00
2l5
1
$355
.
264^
S.-
I
62500 1
62500 I
62500 IR
-
_.-..............-----........--.----..-.-.-..--.--•----.------------.---------------------------------------------.------------
i316 FIRE SERVICES W LT PLA N
30459
9971
4919
9903 I
11GJ3 I
11000 I
11000 I
................................_..----....--_-...-_-.......__...--......_......_.........-__..-_....--------.........---------.....
4317 FTRZ SERVICE /)UVO
461223
42623
42200
20315
40630 1
4845) I
-
484.50 I
4845C 1
••..----_-_--'•-_-
ill$ F1AtAtMVittrATRATi
9111
..
11119
-----•
11090
•---
tA17
liltg 1
Igloo I
Igloo _I-�-tlioo
t....•...............
•••• TOTeI %dCFESSI:'t.L SERVIC
7±91i
12E2�6
11252i
59i73
119u05
137i5G I
137iS0 I
i37i5C I
..............._............................................-....-.-.-..._.....-.................-.--_..........-...................
TOTAL A'1)�r.TS THIS O'VISIOV
)b397
12Si11
112526
59i13
119117 1
1l7i50 1
137i50 I
137i50 I
71 .ENEAAL FUVO OW 32 FiR: 31OIEC1iJN — 3 S
` 1984
CITY Of ORCNO
[OPTION 02)
DIVISION•-
BUDGET YOAKSMEET
-BY OBJECT
AS OF 10-01-84
PAGE j 6
01_BENCPAL.FUNO
PUINNING_I►NO ZONING_
_U;Y_33
__
_ _______
__
_
' �
"'•I OBJECT DESCRIPTION11984
1985
1985r�
1985
1982
1963
1984
•-T-D
EST
DEPT
NOR
COUNCIL
•....
�••
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ADPROP
05-31-34
ACTUAL
R_OU=ST
RECOMMO
' AOOPTN._
41OU
.....................................
SALARIES-REGULA EMPLOYEE
64392
..........
76662
9S432
....... .................
31410
96S4S I
.....
106310
-100-I
I 106310 I
.....- •.---
106310 I
- --« ..... »..-..-...
4111
CVERTIPE-A=_GULAR EMPLOYEE
302
09
200
SB
S6-T
100 I
100 1
....
4120
............
...............................................................................................................................
SALAAIES-TEPP EMDLOYEES
.
S273
2646
$is
2310
2M70 t
1!13
1 1310 I
1310 I
4110
FAY .............................
..............................I.........i.........:....«-.i.........
«... «....
...............................
4131
................
....................................................................................................
VACATIJ.`d PAY (?R0rp 967)
.............................................................................................................
1428
3599
934
I
I I
I
4132
MOLI3AT DAY IPR7G V961
24?3
2476
till
I
I !
»....
:
•#:. •
�,;
.........................................
................
- ................•-------..--.-.----..
».... «--------------------
i13:
SICK PAr lf!!tG 9391
1977
!..
)tl
211
t
I t
!
4136
...................................................................................................................................
OTN£R P.Y IrROC VV41
..........
7
17
...........................................................»......--------.-----
124
I
I 1I
4141
PER4-C:TI CO'vTltBUT(7N
3972
4966
SS15
1761
47SS I
4523
I "Zo I
4S23 ]
iti2
f:CA•C:tY CChT�:'U7I�N
4606
5761
e337
1o94
6
Q 7
....................-..-.-...-..._...........-.
i151
«.................
!IJSaITAI:ZttIO'I :NSURINCE
«
3192
37........•..........-.....-.......-.....-........-................--------------.-----
41
4352
1S2u
i"6� I
S24S
: 5265 I
S2BS I
41S2
..............................................................................................................
LIFE IRSURANCE
64
--------
71
6)
-----190:•-
16
S. I
SS
I SS I
SS I
i1SI•.OFKMAA3
C�Po :NiU4tNC°----------
S86
939
--1195------1195
i
- 251U
:----2510
211L I---------_•---•---_-
••••
.............
TOTAL ?:a33NtL S:RVIC£:
.................»........................_..►..................................................
d6S76
1�)SSJS
i1tSS1
itSii
1/6''64
127SC7
I 127590 /
--------------------
/27SOQ j
i21�
........-..«...-.-....................--
;ff:C[ sUPPI:£t
277e
.jai
3505
1124
34Cy :
3S):
I !SCO
«....................
3SCJ :
i2tU
.....................
M)TCi fu:l9 1 .uBA uANt•.
..... .........
-------
1•B9
...........-.....
..................•---•--•-----......-.--....------.-........-..
fe!1
2S]
974
2S7S :
2S7'+
I !SCO I
—--------------------
2SOQ I
i[32 COUIPM:AT DARTS � :CC£S
-----1------
.
1SS-
66^
--
...------•------..
707
------SOi-------3Sv------
►3
.....
I;,GO-(
.-----. -.« .. . -------- *----- 4"""
S07 I SO] S3•) I
4::1-
:CAL--------------1---------
.-..T..O..!..tl......S..U..r+P..•�.-.:-:-..S.-...M..:..I..Y..•�...E..�.4....I ....-.-.-.....i..�..S..6
......-....-.6.-.1-.Y..]
ILP
.......e---J
------
S-------------I-----3C0
........
sce I ..............
..•..•..•..•
•
-----.2.tQ--------
...... .......-.....-..--....-.....--.-..
-------
....................-...-.-........-.0•0
-•----------- ..-.-.---
-tEGa
-C:NSVLT:4G SiivIC35
170]
117E
3-i
-0 --t ------------------
iiS3uUS3
..............
....................................................I...-1....I........i....;.........................
ENG:NEn(NC^NSJLT
.....................................................................................................................
5)
i306
CTMFi :)�Strl!IAi SEAvjC£S
i92S
121'00
14:7:.
----1650J------6070--
Stid
75J2 :
SS0)
I S500 I
S5�0 I
••••
...................................................................................................................................
TOTAL-PRJFCSS:.4-L-S_AV::---•-1^626-----140
3
- 9203------AC?')-'----2.00-t
- -$000 I--------------------
i321
...--......-•---•-•-------.-..►..--.-...-..------....-•---...--•--••-_-•-•
TELEPNJ'Ii
1172
1706
19Q?
713
1100 I
2131
t 210^1 I
21CO I
i321
FCSTAG:
t]li
�53
...........................--...-....---------
SSS
'tOC :
127?
: 1200 I
»------.--..-
tIC7 t
01 iENERAL FU%D CV
11 DLA•III:NG
ANC ZONING
—34—
r1
' 1984
CITY OF OROMO
[OPTION 02!
DIVISION--
BUDGET MO►KShCEf
-BT OBJECT
AS OF 10-01-8t PAGE 3 7
01 GENERAL FUhO DIV
33 PLANNING AND ZONING
r
' f
'1985
r"�•!`t CBJECT OESCRIPTICN
1984
1985
1985
°�
1932
1983
1784
T-T-?
EST
DEPT
NaR
COUNCIL
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
APPROP
:5-31-8t
ACTUAL
?EOUEST
— RECOMMD
_
AOOPTN• ---� �-
_•
:OTAL=JMMUN1"riJNS
22t6
2659
2900
1269
3000 I
3100 I
3300 I
3300 I_...
+ --•---••---
----•
t3t2
FRIATIJ:G t PUBLICNING
-----•-------------------------57
386
9se
$S]
215
500 I
SSO I
'SO I
$50 T
tS23
AOYEwTiSIfvG
------386--------------------
_
---------------------------.i...-....-I...•-.---L----.
I......»....------•-.
••••
TOTAL FRIATI6G-PJ9LIS--AO
1047
------215-------500-,-----SSO-I-----SS--•-------
550SO
--•---»_-.-�- .---_-
I
t3t�-MAINT
..........................................•-------------...
Off ICE EQUiP�Et[T••••-•----27t-•--••-i76
•••--........
307
------------
322
-I
-----I--------
SO]
-----...............
I
»-.--
500 I
tStl
.....................................•..........................................•....................-...--.........................
FAINT AUiO EOU;PNENi
2362
It09
101,.
------
/?7
1tC! I
150� I
1500 •
..•.-.•.-.-.-.------».»•
1500 I
4142
-.....-.......-•-..-......-......--....-...
MAV.T M; SC iCU:Pr_NT
411
278
1SJ
tsl
200 I
230 I
200 /
2C0 I
••••
.-.....-....-..---••------•
TOTtI C�VTnACT M::N•oEO.:I
......................---.-•...--••---------•--.-.....---........--..-...-....-....»
1^t7
i25t
1iS0
12S)
2^.•0 ;
22J0 I
2200 I
--------------------
2200 I
t3S5
L'tT: FR�CESS;\G
•••---•--•••-----
19J
2tS
•••--•�
t7S -
300 i
3Q�
--------------------
3
•.••
.............•----......-....-------------•----••-----•-•---••---•---_.......-..-•--.._.-...._..-..-...........»
TJ•tL-C�fA�PnJ:�SSIn;
19"
225
7T----•--222
----•
-.-----------I
775
300 2
------I--------------------
30Q
SCC I
tS56
_....--.......--•-............
hCCI; f•:a• C 1.1F-;t••JJL+
.......................................••---......-...--.-._.._-...-...-..-...-...----------•---------
t 73
SJ)
i50 I
60J I
6Q0 i
----------•---------
60J I
••••
..........._.--..-.-........•
TOTAL )TtiEA t•]NTRACT SERY
.................•---ES
tl3
7VS
SO]
3?6
t5�
6J9 I
6]0 I
6:0 I
t371
GEt1E°AL l[:B:L:TT lNSUR
SS1
--------
---.--y69---.---`SQ.---..-cS9.I-.-.-5;5-`---.-SQS-=-•---SQS
S9.;•: ........
1-1.3 ----•-....-•.-----•.t0..i
lt) I
....--..tQ .......
t.0.I---..•---------- ..--
iJ7t.tUTC710T;vE
IY-.l.i:NC.-----_------^S^-------lld
...................................................
- --
...............-........................................
tii\T Of R...
.
212
I
25339S
....?.. I........:.......
....................
I
••••
TOT.A. :11)UAANCti
ItSt
9J3
.........................................�....
13S9
421
In
941
94
...........................
940 I
t38U
hEPSERSnIPS
. --•---
1i5
-•-
23S
- ••
230
•2]]--------13------.
i:3
203 I
2J] T
200
2.0 I
t3B1•Ta:v=L-Y•L!";E-0.1RKI4G-
............................................_.............._................:..................................................
S2S
1�0-i
-- 1S]-j-----150-.-----15�
. .....................
I
:382..
M:CT:...N.: LXF;,I'S?S
.............................................
S]
77
)5
2
75 ,
10J I
100 I
103 I
.r
OTn=A•C_.O�CS
326
`7
121
375I
4S0
t50
....................
t50 I
tst..................EQ..............67........5..............................................................
CFF;CE FUt►,-FI•-.UIP
.........lit.:............_.......
1...
21t
:
I
I
....................
1
iSSLtUT:M)T:V:
.
.
... ..... ...................
........
..•-.
.............
.........i.........l....................
....
TCAL
6
1210
........................�
........I.........;..............................
•---------------.---.
TOTAL
AYJ�hT; T►[S- ;v[S;JV-------11232e----1363v0
---1cS1tJ
•---55t51----1c�235-T--15075)
t
1SC73p---1.-7-
I
SO 30 T
U1 :ENERAL
FVhC QV
33 OLANN14C
INC 20V:►tG
-37-
•
PERSONAL SERVICES
FUNCTION _---
FUND
General___
_DIVISION__Protective
Inspection/Zoning-Adm.
NO. OF
EMPLOYEES
1984
1985
1985
POSITION TITLE
PRESENT PROPOSED
ESTLMA,rED
PROPOSE
APPROVED
Zoning Administrator
1
1
29,395
31,760
31,760
Asst. Zoning Administr=:tor
1
1
23,425
26,120
26,120
Field Inspector
(e)75%
67%
7,265
10,815
10,815
Building Official
1
1
24,145
25,110
25,110
City Clerk
(a)25%
-0-
3,320
-0-
-0-
Deputy City Clerk/City Clerk
(b) 5%
-0-
960
-0-
-0-
Accounting Clerk
(,:) 5t
316
850
900
900
Assessing Clerk/Typist
(d)35%
35%
1,730
5,765
5,765
Secretary Part-time (Recorder)
50%
50%
5,455
5,840
5,840
Total
'46,545
106,310
106,310
Temporary Position
Clerical - Part-time 40`k 4U% 1,270 1,310 1,310
(a) City Clerk resigned 7-31-84
(b) Deputy City Clerk appointed City Clerk 7-31-84
(c) re: septic billing and collection
(d) hired 9-1-84
-38-
(e) hired 4-23-84
+A'••'s�jYffi • �'!►'
W",7�j.•..,�r�• 'r' t`
Xi�
• � . - �' t
.. �i
,�� .•
- � �y�)'.t.%t ♦4�
♦;?•�
_ ..v�._�.•4i.••,•, .!, s ..w .r,. •1'vi �t•^ytia;Y;�.Yt•w'ILC=4`�'.)dll C _
CC(t,C`�i�._•tit r � t,��I. -���• r '�'�.• - ,•i),�j.yyM7
-•
a,� < ;' : �, �� -
_�i.'����-,�.H
- ;.,L �• �.� �
"� �' i-' :i 1, 1
4 ..-11 n••�"!•, .�
f /t
.i:.1 •i.
• i'�
�C i+'
'Y., �•'��♦jfY
.•
1964
CITT OF ORONO (OPTION
O21 DIVISION•• BUDGET
YORKSMEET -BY
OiJECT
AS
Of 10-01-84
.
r
Ol�¢NERAkOIV
34 CIVIL DEFENSE
s '• : :•. , j' ; +'•r
^r`
•1984
" r;''
OBJECT OESCRIPTICN
19iS
1985
19iS v�r• -
1
1902
1984
DEPT_
"�,�:;�.4,•:;��-• ('t _..__.
-� • ��� �-
—�-1903
ACTUALACTUIL __A?PROP
_V-T-O •EST
05-31 CTUAL
�HGA
REQUEST
••COUNCIL
R[CONMO
AOOPTN. __
?
CFFICE SUPPLIES___
««.
---........
_ :- 4. 90
•.I .-.-.�60
3
.I ..•.6
CO •I ....600
.-00
I
.:. :..---...«.....-..
•♦
.................
4232EQUIPMENT
.
PARTS A ACES
.........
460
3GO
300I
3^00
I
;a;I
.
.A
..............................................................................................................................
••••
TOTAL SUPPLIES-MAIN
_
101 059
900
700
I
940
I
900 I
9C0 I
............................
4305
«.................----.-.-.--.--------
ENGINEERING CCNSULTINS
926
«........
....................................................
I
I
T
I
..
e-et
.............. ............................................................................
.. ft S£.VIC
626
i
i...................
,-;•, !:.r .,::.
432U...............
.... OVE
.«..................................
616953
.
.........................
•7S
«...I
90
................................-..
900
.
4321
POSTAGE
75
75
----------------------
I
'S
I
75 I
7s I
..............................•-----....----------•-•---•--•
••••
TOTAL CJAMGA.C.1TIONS
f91 953
915
366 075
.------••--•---------------••---------•----
•.7S
I
97! I
975 I
4SL�
UT II:TI£4.........-...............................-.......-....--..-.......�I,
'?�J
I....-
............
I
....................
I
•••••T3T:L•UTILITIES
..............._.....................
.......................
..c...........................
!
263
I
260 IT
« ....................
260 .
43OU
-...........................................................................................-......................
MEP1aER5NIP1
36 13
5li
30
I
52
I
SO I
sv I
..... ..............•............................
•••• TOTAL CTMER Cr+RGL!
.- ......
3[13
................. •...-
SO 3I
:
•......
50
40 I
.... ......................
i0 I
........
TOTAL AMCJhT3 TMIS wIVIstON
.................................................................................................................................
.... ......
82A 2451
tots
..... ....
366 150S
....
I
..
-2115
..
1
.......
21os I
............................
2115 I
Cl :ENE°4L FUND OV 34 CIVIL 0EF_N5- - 3f .
i
.l...:tl..-!.L. "iC':
•... -.. . .
.....- e�'.a'•«y�!.
:�.-
L/:',.`-'i��ii•` +`t��',2".'Rt-A�a -i tit- :.t!.•ei• watt li.':.70�
tr'?��� t �:l �y' •
4�
ti ��,�isc
.fig �
''
f'
��
_✓ +.K��
�+ ._
+:Jt'T?��•
190•
,..•
CITY OF ORONO
_ r�1;�`.
COPTION 02!
r
DIVISION BUDGET
VORK04ELT
-BY OBJECT
AS
`L
OF 10-01-iA L "'
PACE j�Q'
., ell.
01 it1�R1�fYN0 _ DIV 35 ANIMAL-CONTROL_�
,'
JJ
+••
198i'~
1985•
1985 '�19SS
(� �:�
sL--
OBJECT
DESCRIPTION
1982
1984
T-T-D
EST
DEPT
NCR COUNCIL
_ _-,______
,i
-
_1983
ACTUAL ACTUAL_
APPROP
OS-31-84
_
ACTUAL
_
REQUEST
RECOMRO — AOOPTN.___
MAt
41OU
SALAA IES-AEGULAR CM&LOYEE _
.-.............
..
it
'
.....-..:::......-
t/tt
.......................................................................
oERA•C2TY CChTRIBUTION
».--..j. .......«.
»....
!
.....
... CITY CONTA:BUIIOV.............
«.......................................T.....-...
L.......-I-.
.........................................................................................................................w.........
••••
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
t
I
I I
»....
.... .............----------
4321.o05TAQE
......
.................
...;..-----------------------------------------------------------------------
..I ------ ...I.---..--..--------.-
••••
.........................310-------.:I
TOTAL CJMN4AICATI07S
......30;-....-----------.-LO-I-..-.....I---.
tt ---
--- I
I
I I
t3t2
oRINTIAr: A PtBIi:HIN4
...
753
175- 830
303 I
I
•
--------------------
••••
--------
TOTAL PRINTING -PUBLISH -AO
753
1!S- SO3
7C0 I
I
I I
------ ...-.--------.-----------
..................•--....-•----------•--.-.-..--..-.-...-.-....-..--.._..----..........................
i3b4
ANI!tAl CtaE
Sbt
d1S 1050
1!1
BCC
1500
I
1500 1 ISCO I
tfb1•ANI!IAL
oATAGL S�AVICE••_••••-..?i177.....-t399
---------------------------------
.3-^c-i...-A:Q4•I••••t000
..................................................
:•-_-b000 I......-•_-••-•
.....
......................................................................
••••
TQTtL JTvtA :OITRACf 3!AV
..........
SStI
t91t 4310
......
15•Zl
........-.I
t;O: I
.
-If00
..•
T700 I 7100 t
.......................-.
.r......
T TRt.
....................................
... ..................
......
A90JVT5 Tti:t :IYIS:JN
t00t
...............................................................................................
.......
t770 ;650
152:
Stun
7SOO
7300I7SC0 I
Cl 4EVEP.IL FUND OV SS ANIMAt C4111AOL -yo-
1 t - •�r.t,.}. `�f.?q. .r �. �.� ,-_ "�' �`. �Tj "�iXS�t ant:+r
.✓ C 193a CST\ Or OAONO IOATION oa'• DIYI 3I OA-- NYD(LT YOANSNCCr -31 OBJECT AS 01 +10 01-34 , '•no(, Y/
�iKl1Al.LunO`__.31J {+Ss4iK[AtxL ,.
_ .
W(CT R3CO RTION ` 3 '' —AC -1134 I135 Nat SNC
-IL ACTS J , HAf T-r31 OCIT NOA COUNCIL
ACTUAL ACTT IYaI - 3YAAOP OS-31-5 Sl-3f AClY{L—AC3W3!-L(C3M0 A03NTM ------
' 1 � 43Y{
......(N.St.100(i 0{0 I ..1.6.0...1 ....940
. ..1 .."._._.•..L.O_»I
....................... .____ _____.,
............r......................................».....•......_.._......'_.
• 4305 LF{INLOIING CONK LT NO isa ST{ 4500 at 4000 1 AISO 1 4250 1 4250 1
..............................................................................................................»--»-»..»...»....
• TOTAL iAOCL{SI"AL SCAYIC 312 101{" - SLID {OL 100 1 $210 I 11-1 1 S2IO I -- -
...................................................................................................I-----------------.-....
apY A[rYFDi f AL:FtlYAi[w[MTS i50 2 1 I
.. • u....e. u.....-.... a u.u..o....eua».»e..u...e.....r»a....e»......... o----
»............w1»u..ar....«...
.. TOOL OTxd OIN YAIptF13 113 I I I
IOIR HWMq rw1A Otrl sl 0x N2 ISl{ SHO ...I .... 1 5110 1 1210 I SI10 1
a+ SEW" rrxD uL 41 LNLSNCC-:AO -y/—
�
4 I�,•i.�2rF��'�2�
I,
• I••�"L•`•lw4
C[iT Or Dome Som lOx Nt
otv if i0x•• euo9Lr eOexSKCi -er ONCCT IS
Cr 10-01
64 PAGE y2
01 Sr�KM.I
JYxO- 0Iv
at STREET
C9MSi a
'
•wJCCT
_ _.._..
ZS
HSS
Iw!
f 4
DESCRIPTION
1912
19n
19P4
S-i-D
E
CSTT
DEPT
oVr
MOM
LeOxc3L --- --
--
ICTY6
ICTYLL
IPPFOP
OS-01-I4
ICrYlL
F[OVtST
xLCOMP
IOOPTF:—
N00
34L!xlC!-xtCYlp EMPLOYEE
R)26
91564
IC9SV
43619
112910 T
120115 1
120545 1
120545 1
.Ji•« • ..._.
,,-;r_-
)A:•9
1.«..•».e«..-__.«•
•-
......
.....
................
• - ....««...
..•.........
•_.
Utl
O9C2r VC -FULL" CMM.OICE
1695
IS12
SI00 I
w00 I
$e00 I
w00 1
.._.._.._._... ..
.....
1120
.._
SnARIC3•TCYP IMPLORES
1
9
...a600-.
...1)l9
2;
SO I
1
[
1 -
----------------
...................
U )1
................•-•-•------5,17—.--•----......................................._........._
91C:T20M 9a1 liMp4 9e 11.......
1e!)......
).l
1J>a
.....T_......
I........
1
I
-------
4132
w4to4T r1+ Ir!DY 9re1
..................
S. ID.
..._._.
__.ef •_._......._�_.
I ____.
_.. i_..._._.
' ._.....
{1]]
........a914.._...
!I[A P!T 1•e09 9M 91
St
.
..... .. ..........
...�.5..•_..'�._
__ ..
....... ...............
• ...�........«.
41U
wF1•CI1+ COMT4lBuriw
6153
U19
6I)l
2179
$520 1
SIN 1
1345 1
5363 1
Na:
IICF Cf 11 ccx rn:e uT [Jx
nn
el vl
aee
IJ 41
N)s 2
---- t
NDD I
---D I
..............._..........._.................__._.........-N._........_.........._..._...._.._.-....:..___..._._«.._.........__..
USI
Kf•1f At L1: C'1 IwY4INR.....
6Ne_-__.
Qee......Yv
.... [
w09 {
w00....
woo I.........
UH
l:r: IFSUIIIFCC
..........
.-H1200
iI
-- --
I1
r
._..._.........Ils
u•la
a.vi..Pl
s+sb
....U..2w9 ......-
s2i's
sxls:
,I1ss
lafs
i..........---.........................--.--....--....._.__..--._..--«--.
to
-OSTS.
1Nlt1n-29s
la iR2 S0S
[I.es+.e
«._.
.a.....N..
..aT.9b.1.iLL.n
uu
.w.f.p.e.•4.L .a]sC .u".r.:et
....
Pncc wrvu❑
sm
341
wo
1se
aoo 1
433 :
aoo :
wo I
R20
4Jf 01 Taco a 411b FIG NT9
IS19S
1n9f
Iri]9
sN6
16000 1
,J 7➢0. L
11000 {
irocc----- {
au1
cur....
334
R00 2
1
:
1
----
----
------1100
----
----
6131
IL[O a 240MCI FU T•JrrLY
21
1
l
I
..L.o.0 .I.P .PE..n.! ..I.I.m..:..a ..le..e..s .............................................................•...........
....................... »_...
.t.v.R.
rRa
TIS9
103
23m
1;00 1
tool 1
6400 1
Koo I
_........_____._._:_.._.......
----------
...................................i.._..........._...._.V
t
-IWOL {
4zw
eaoaL T re•ISO:au
w
I
...........................................................................................................___....................
....
19T SL TUPiliti-P: IN•6.4[
Ills),
"S016
152001
13136
15:619 I
156W I
l+6eoo 1
156900 1
NU)
LL wI-L C•1SulilN K2YIC2+
R.......IN.
.......
i
............
.
NYI
[w;YG:FE CCe]ILH.w..........)W.......Sv1......15]0......PS
..1
..................1047
.... ....
1Y00......
lv.__....law...
.... [ _._....__.«
.........-_...
...........................
1399
OtxE9 CL SULTLK St9910E)
21e
.2
922
! ...........................
.u•
TOTIL IIJI [351:)!L 5E99:'
2441
1191
tso0
Ills
IStr 1
4:31 1
1000 1
loco 1
.............................I.
.......
.......i.S.S.O
.sil
._._
..I .....,6..2I...I .....1.1.2.5 . ....16..2.S _1.a.RIPF.]!C
...................
..................
Y ........................................................
1......................
.............
... ...............
O1 OEFEM:L
rLNG 09
42 STFEIt
COMSI 4
M4141
Jq3—
f
p.
,BYDSET
I904 CITS OF ORMO YORIOM 02)
UIYISt
M•• U3 RR JRCLT
•OT MJCCI
I/
OF 10.01-\t PatC 97.
—__
a19N
logsOFT
19/S
HQ
(
•� MJCCI OCSCR VTIOtI
19,
1...
I9/a
r4-0
EST
OCR
XQ
CWMtTL
• _y
ACiWL
-•CIU AL
.- VP.OP
DS-JI.\t-
ACTUAL
REaTST
RLCORI, L-
TV
A0CPT4-
rOSTNI
116
12
130
li_0 _ _
120 I
120 t
120 1
......
120_I _ .... ._
___....«__._._....
1b.Y�^95ay _a�
-ART .............
........
........
...............___..............._._..____
.........................
1151
1)R
1600
Ali
100 I
IT'S 1
1215 1
IAA! I
u.• tOT4 L2MRYIJ UT[ONS
« __
Isl
ISS 1
101 I
100 I
too 1
_ U22 iR IXTtNO a FUBItMA9
93
211
too
«__....«_...
......................................."«_......_....•............................__.....__........_........«..
I
1
I
.. U2) •Or CA rlS IMO
1
.
. ---_ .«..«_..._....__.
...................................................................................................
Topl Pr p Ti Ra+U0. [sx•a0
tlB
211
IOS
I9.-.^.
153 1
130 1
too
_._.too L.....«........«.
....
Uia VfIUTILS
Itto
3sET
2N]
._.
U1
2310 1
2103 1
2100 1
2100 I •-
....................................„
1595 STREET LfO.11A[
........_.........._....................._._._._...........___.....__.._.._«..«.
.or
103a0
t3009
320•
............................
ID]00 1
10003 1
lei" I
_......................
IOOC] I
.............
....................................
.... TO taL JIIL3T:C)
..........................
106 T\
121++
....
400J
IHa
.... ..._......._...
..... 1
—2,
1R0] t
....
1i100 1
----- ..••'24C9
12100 i
••___........«.._.
......................................................«..........
uv Lou[illur • aac R[....
+zw]
2Je
I
12AW
..... t
....
f
............ ....•_._........___._...................................._.........•_.._......_._....__.....____...__...«._...._.._..
.u• TOTri iLRtAL3
.....
1f RS
.....
11513
124[]
Ile
.....
tiaYC I
RaC]
IiaEO
..... I
...............................................................
Ul0 RA IMT SFF itL LwfORLn T.
= !
too......
-. ..............................._._.........._....._......__..
.51.•-•--•
SO -I-
f] t
30 1
SO i
•- '•-
43U RA At Wf0 CaLIMCMT
..01 -
atla
-
4996
)N]
30,0.... 1
.._.3003
.... 2
.. ....
.... I
..
.................
.............. ..........................
uu RA:xI n:Sc au:•rcxr
...
ISte
..........
qv,
............
•000
...
20z0
]cW t
.......__..............._._......__......._.....
.... i
IOCa I
lose I..«.....
...........................................•..•..__...__........._.............._`
uu Y. IxT swat 6 aYAvoJ
...•....._.1°_.......°-.
.._.._..............................».._.........
.........................................................
.At9 srR:na-ruo-ax Ts acaY ua
zre......_+
r1
ua ...a_�9_3_
1c;) t
a3Bo t
a/ac
.... TOT4 C]':IJACI xalY•Y[9A1
_.
R9r
16363
•...a3oa.
11201
I911.
1'139 1
10013
Ia"S"
_=0010«
.-« _.........._..
•-
.............................. ........
'.. U51 F[[i:M3•CJx F•lCn00lf
•••.
..... ..--------
«......
n _.«............•......«....__.
... t
Joe
... I
1.. t .............
..........112
.... TOTri LtOCF Cf XTAACT fEAY
........
............................ISS_1•
300
St_-._---11]_•
IEO 1
3O0 I
•- .11t2o-3.
.......
..•
-.10 ....._t
+66r
13,5 [
OU I
1\IS
112u BCR!R IL LPI:Lar .W
tat•
U!
....
.... ..
.
InYY
s.c_3x
fN
919
....
600
211
212 i
...._...........__»......._..._..«_«
I
:
.
.UU...12.)1 ............................
..[.w..O.Yr...CIi..M..RB..CT.M.: ..Y..C.
..........................
21s,----
271s l
lI.a.p
--- ------ ...._.....i916 .
.g.1.2J.e .iC_.
...........................
LPB:L:Ta axiUA
_.9!]
..._........._......................._..._..-...
t93
113 1
.. .
911 I
..
1S
...
91f f.l...UPBA[LtL
..« .............
............. ..
4311 ttSUAaxCC Ad"' 01 B{COSO
..
.......
622
622
rt0 f
729
lac 1......................
........... .................................._...._..........._._._..............._.........«_...«___..
.
u.. TBISL INYAA-CP'
5:19
1311
.Sm
Ill.
..... ....
$,1. I
.
♦IAS I
619s 3
..
6i95 1
.. .. .
... ..... .. .....................5
.. $O
1..o i
S
S] 1
SI
SO 1 T1
a]/0 MPBEYJX:PS
01 SIRENAL FL'40 Or
12 ST\CZT
OUST t
RAITI
-q3-
_
iu[•�V.
1914 Call Or INUNA
(OPT Tom 021
OIVTStON--
BUDGET
NORRSNLET 'By OeACCT
e5 Or 10.01-4
Ot SCNC_NL FUND D[Y Q STREET
COXST S
FATAL
_
IXet
19sS I9e5 1965
OIJ[CT DESCRIPTION
Hel
He)
lee4
T-i-O [Si
DVT NOR COUNCIL
RCIVIL
ACTUAL
- PPROP--
0S-�4U - ICTUJL—
1[OYtfT - XCCOMC aOOPTX:
♦
1
100
Y too f
103 I 100 1 too I
_4111 TRSM_L-MILEAGE-P.R.;46
._.
.....«.........................«.:.—
AB! L[C[Nftl 4 1JlU
1553
♦
so
x0
«.... IQ
1Q
1D I
10 I10 to I
..-......_. .........«.....«....._.«...-.-.
.
.a....Y .......R.... ..........................
.
4S
. I«.................----------------------------
....
.............................«.............................................................................
RI 1200 1
An 1R[i OtdPOlLL CWR6LS
UlUUu0o
♦x I
1 «............
.... .. ..........
..---- -.-.-.-.-.-.«-.----
......
::eO
...........
e11xS♦J I
I Z564 I I
.... TOT4 OtntN DSJFG
:to
111
........ .........._.......[ .............«....
.................Y.L ..........LS........-.--.- --------------------------------------------
I
....
I
................
4SW OInLR EOUIPet%T
$145
1101
............
1
....... «.........
I I
...........---.--- -.............. slat..
-.
..b..P.I .U..LC....O.Y.R..4.T...............
...0......G.-..0.....TP..OR.I.LL.
..........
............
t
I [
..............................
924
nD
eU]ne1
----- -
.-....netI..._slat.
.t1 _.....
1 n11 t also i-*------
.-....
............RF..............;;ex......
TOUL
........
41
.-------------
rn s SPOT I
.-------------------------- *---- ----------
...................................... ...._................
WSf INl CNP•t FfPPWS 3f-2-
....
.--------------
273l .-. 5-2...
slat...
.................... xSH [ 2SSf 1 I1v5 1 ........«.........
....e«u««s...se.«.
............................
e e4e lelfl O1NLV OIfBYe1LFL FTI------IIYl.-----I)St-----.1a
14----------------fall-!.
ffel 1 f/e/ :... eSOS-�....................
....................
..............................
S2115 !n0}! f
SR)11 1 1)n 11 I I
TLTRL gWNI: Tn:1 J1Y I5: ]V
11 fvO
SASE!
HI51)
...... ...............
ct GCAML rung 0 4x SUC"vT MAY L X1trT —Y4—
PERSONAL SERVICES
FUNCTION
FUND General
DIVISION
Street Maintenance
NO. OF
EMPLOYEES
1984 ___
1985-`
1985
POSITION TITLE
PRESENT
PROPOSED
ESTIMATED
PROPOSEO
APPROVED
Public Works Coordinator
258
258
8,545
8,885
8,885
Foreman
75%
75%
20,405
21,220
21,220
Heavy Equipment Operator
1 @ 85%
1 @ 858
20,380
21,195
21,195
Light Equipment Operator
3 @ 858
3 @ 858
54,895
57,090
57,090
Senior Maintenance
1 @ 35%
1 @ 35%
6,485
6,?45
6,.745
Field Inspector *
1 @ 258
1 @ 33%
2,200
5,410
5,410
TOTAL
Hired 4-23-84
112,910 120,545 120,545
-45-
r ', a NR f �(�. .S' ':
�
f • .. - ..
... .• .. /t• ��,•, Lp„ 4 ,� .
_ —,
' ^' iNt CI11 OI AONO
.�•,
�
10/T ION 0[I DIVISION— BUDGET YONXSKET -BI OBJECT
F
of OF 10.01 it
orr SI /V!l N[ELTM XYRSIXO
_
f • iRLT
-
-
KSCRI9TION
1994
1995 Voss lW•
_. _
1992 INI Volt I-T-O LR
--
OCR no COUNCIL
ACTUAL ACTUAL I./RO>--0s 31-0t - ICTY•i'
RCOVESI RECONNO--ACC910. — - ---
"X•••r.yn,•a./y0 �,I If!J1VsltC MCAT. XURSIXO
....................
._ _ Jrtf )lrf t
.. ___.._..
LIf [ MIS I Jstf [
.....................«.r•....................................................
•••• IOIK GROGCfSIJGIL S[RVIC
-��- ... ..--_... ..
)ITS
.... 1 ... I ... I ... [
1011L MJYNIL tNU oir
lal0•
)rIs 1175 1 3015 1 1845 1 JSts [ -
01 iCKRJL IYYO 01 11 "IRl.0 Xi MN XVgltlt
�
t
t
r
•
a
Ina CIT) OF DAMO
torrtoN 02,
CIVILIAN•• PUO•[T VORKWET -ST 03YECT As
or 10-01-34
PAGE yi-
01 acNCNAL FUND DIY
_ _ .. ___..
O ru N! A
.___
NCCAcaxaN
____________—_._.___.____...____._--____-
t• •
•
CalCtT OcfCAtFTICN
-
1ES•
1133
- toes
HCI
f•�
-
TS3I
.•vraor
loot
T-T-O
CSr
OVr
-lc3ucsr—AccallA"
FAA
CON
AtrwL-
ACTU
AcruK
Ps. v-aa
•afnE
ADDrrN: --"- ------
....,, •,..• �.�
4100 IALAAIES-A[0ULAR CAPLOVEC
1001
OIO
21143
>NS
to30C I
3r3f0 1
xOs0
_ f
.............................. ».............. .......... :........_..-...-.:-...... -............... «.«««
x))sC I
.'
4111 OYCATVC-R[YULAG EAKor C[
51
IW
I
I
.......... ».«... »....
.
................................ I
I
1131 VACAr1CN PAT rK06 Far,
I110
yT
...-.-»......
-
...................... «..... ••.---•-r04
............-.....«....................-.!
1
1
1
1
USx pLfaQ PAT r... YHI
fr1
V1
.........-I
.........
.--»............------
.- «----
S
[
a]SS SICK PAT V!fA 9H1
xSD
{!a
...
-......•....................................^..----.......-•-•-------..........-.».----...-...-....----......«--«......------.-..
99
I
I
t
1
HYIA:......
+]H
IHY
J{f
I
I
11;S 1
IIU I
al \x !:C\•Ct}1 tAYTA tR Ur IaY
.-...1 !1-'..•.tat.•
...a
1101
\J0
....
tlas
....
IC )]
ISSJ
1Y30
{I SI pfrf l\L:!. ... ........
Oil
....
Oa3
-1
I
"If-5-2t
_•
tali 1
1+R Lln :v3w:AtE
1.
O
11
...
a
...0
....
.....................................................................................................:..............................
+]
IS
11
O I
alfS --- ---- -CPA tAl urant[
._-..._....-._...--............................................................................-..-.......-.--.....-..-..-....«-...
tl1
f.9
99
fYx
Ni
ISOI I
Iola
IHC I
•..• TOiy aO!'Y4 3[Avl.[s ..•-•-A•
.............................
JY
...-.....................-----------------------------........«-.-.......
23T15
WTI
10„3
fls Sf 1
3003 I
]U00 [
]t IDC I
R1P OIf:C( SYIK t[f
1
1
x1
-«----«..-.«....
xS [
.. I
xf t
x) t
u wit to rota a wauuon--.._•.�_)
- _.
+ava• •_--iaa^
o_•__--
D]_t_
+s) t
tscA
uoD
aYx+ aa:n na a r[amlu tour
.^
••••••-»----
axll ALOa a OAaYats rae aWq+
r0)
..............................._........................._........_.___...................:..................»....................
to s<
Il.^
zas
O'] 1
1301 1
1313 t
130e
W)x a\•.E a G)LS
Yzz
\3r
r).
Ill
'C]
YV
....COVI.....
....................... ...... ....«....
.
..........
..........
i
To.-I
APO I
r
•••• TOTAL SUrP� es•Nila-! Al
xa]e
34S2
.....-.._.__..-........-_......._..-.....-.........`....-..-.....--.....
Sa Yf
lsfr
il9s
3505 [
Isv1 1
ISIS
{JUf [MOtYCCA: Ma ^.:\iAL rIMD
fe
x`)
Ia !
IEO
lOP
afVe 0}E• CCI'd lYtt :'.f 3C•YI Ctf
S
•
•••• POT 11 iLOx-ff•)Y,l 1"AY fa
................... .
q]
-------.-
I
llxl Pp i•BE
1
1
5]
.......NC.................Cs_.._...
1
SC
..
I
Sf t
5) !
1C 1
•••• TOTAL cl..U1:C:Tf Ohs
1
1
s0
_.^._....___:.
......... ...........
..........................................................so
sE
1. I
i.
y^
a)x! MtLrINe a-W------i
.........-
f0
...--...-....-...--.-...._____.•
SO
-'••_SC
--------.-----•----•-
t
SO }
s]
1
•••• IC NL aRiMItLP!V DL IfM•aA
s0
..........................................................SD
i
s] t
$]
4C 1
uEa ar !L: rl Ef
.......................................
vl
«._....-.......-....-....-
13•
IS) .....--`
..................«........._--.....-.....-._.-_...._.
.........5.-.---«iS:
t
.....................-....................
130 1
Is0 1
tl 1EMC^-L FYNA AY
el ..R.S a Artie Mal
_y7-
11414 CITY aI MAN,
I arTIM 009
-
DIVISION"
-..t._u yt
- • 4
OYD{ET
WDAKIP[CT
-a9 OMIT
AS OF 10-dr-84
'.
NCCACA11M
I,I
u
yid
T 0VN
L; DESCRIPTIO
-____
_
—
IFIT
1913
1944
so$,
r9.S
loss
19115 - -s
ACTUAL -
- ACTUAL-
APPaOP
OS•t
SIJe
CST
ACTUAL
DEPT
A
NM
COYNCIL
[ ....... To RL UTILITIES
_{V!ar-XfCCAN0
ONPq,----'--------
-S1.L.
�....i
-_..A
ISO
ISO 1
15-0-
3.00
FIT RENTAL
•A•.I..L..•r-.•X..C..F-CaW...O.:•L..N..ra.T...T
•.•...T•.Xr[T..O....•O-O...
14.
2000
S00
..._....—
.«..�•.«_..�.�•.................._..«....._«
.........f.t
........••
I
IOJO r
1300 IT•.
.00._R.
1afC
--------
O f
.-------------
OW I
«_•_••••---
Idea
CL._C..GJ•...VT.Y.
...
....................
.t.
............«_..•_.._...«
I
..
i10SJU
JV I
.Op
«.••••M..............................ge.......
_.•••««•..•.«µ._«
.
J.f.•
C...
•_•••••••
................
I
i00NCNI
..
..t.•I•YTq...4..
I00.«...._.._I
---
I
f....................
]00
M5v
0
SII
--
100 I
._.......................
1.........................................................•
••«..•t"A•.0
Iloif
.."••••.••
•I .
.}I:................«....................«..........................{
.....T.10.
..
..........
..
si
...
I. I
..
.
«..........-ftI
4200 I
......Y..�......I.N.......9...C:a.:
•...
•...•.ff-.•]_..•i.'.l•1...
................
IaD^
as
taI
oJ
laaD
------------------ --
load t
4)re a[v.--•
_Y .L Lial :L 111 in]uX
................'.._......_........._-------..__.........._......
110.1
--•---------"!
Ii
i••••••«^_._.
l
ill
'
._..........«
............... .....
43 )t MprLXIr 2M1faaANtC
•••••_•••••--• ....................
LOUIa Ne.IICIS
.....................................................
-4
.5 I
SS I
f5 I
SS
••••••••••••••••!v••__..
S.d._.......�
fl )t fV•OXO r:.0 I'rSLI.XLL
U)> VNFI[LL, , Pf ati9 :YlV0.
.._
_ _..l_.0
-«...............................
...............•.••..••._••
100
:00
i
...........
.......
1
••••••..•
•••••__
.............
e3 I
..._..30
...ILTD:J.mudCf
...................
....._.........................«...
II
..._..
J
S
t
eeDC
...........
COYfII:M1I
..
....._...._
;
...-.-_....«.._...«.«.
.......................................................
t
t
....................
........_.
................................
•eH5
59JQ I
45,11
al)CS
•••••_••
.
{5)01 1
=r .CIEs-, lull a. el ✓eA.s A rtcafpipn
-w-
PERSONAL SERVICES
FUNCTION
FUND General
DIVISION
Parka 6 Rec.
__________.._________.___....
R0. OF
EMPLOYEES
1984
__ 1985__
1985
1t08I1IO1TITLE
PRESENT
PROPOSED—
ESTIMATED
PROPOSED
APPROVED
Public works Coordinator
88
8%
2,735
2,845
2,845
Foreman
20%
20%
5,440
5,655
5,655
Heavy Equipment Opecetor
L0%
l04
2,400
2,495
2,495
Light Equipment Operator
3 @ 10%
3 @ 10%
6,460
6,720
6,720
Senior Maintenance
50%
50%
9,265
9,635
9,635
TOTAL
26,390 27,350 27,350
-49-
r....
.. ... .. ..
.a:
�.
.mYNN•.•Tf arv....v.v
..
M4 CITI OI ORAO [OPTION 921
OtYISIGN••
BUDGET VOGYSNO[r -Br GWCT AS T 10.01 Ba
-Div TZ_ CONTINCCNCt _
_ _ -
PfSE fD. .
_____ —
^-
-.
fvBs fqs
feu r-r-D Ls1
fsss
lvff
'
•C ru6L -
•Cru4'
D[n
AI°.oP OS-JI-Ba ACNAL ' RCOMST-
RQ
RECOMO
cou[cu
` SpprrV:'
..•r;,a/1LTA.y�.. ___.906
OTNla CCNWtTlw 3laviccs
]22t Jiif
i I
t
f
•••• 10r4 IAJI!l II CNaL SG YIC
••••••••••••......•«v"••'•«•••^••••^••^••^.�.««..«
...................».. ........................................
J223^• 3223 r 1
1
t
UZ2 .R INIIN4 { NBLICNI\L
... .................--
-
____ __ __
-- - ••• ...
____ ..
....................
t 1
r
I
..D ....J.
------------ ............»------------
.................
wf I [
r
;..«..«------ ..--- .
•.°. TO rfL On, CHARGES
••••••••••••••••••••
••
... ..
491 491
....
IwD
--•'•-••-•^•
-----•—--«•— --- «-
...r.YR..M..f.tAr..Li.•C.[T.NU.A1.tC.Pf .........
.............. I 1
_ff.l
....... 2••v ........... .................f..»....
21 Sv
..........
.....3f....0
...G..I.f.;.tL.
.................. ...................................
_
f fOC YI.Ei eaUf°rL.i
iv ])
...........
....................
..............................................................
I
.... rOr•. [:PITIL .Y•L.I
131]r
•-•----••----••..............t_--.._-.....-...-.
zfSi ilSv
•-----��
.......................................................•--.-----...-.
f t
i..«....-..-
fnD P[•. NLYt r.....:..Ur 1.-,•
fawn
-'-"-"•••.......................«.........-_..._.....
..... f)e0f
••--••••• •••••••...................`M:
full) (
Serf.
t
.... TOw TLLSIC A9
$UO1
.....-----
5. .»»..............«......«.«------ ..-
.L
..»..... .......................... ........SI.OL
...
f svrJ) !
Svr]) :
Srrl) r
aPoJ COYI ROhG. 4..
...................«.........---..-..«...
....
.........................
r.:3YRSL.cn , Inl
aT,
-...-.................-...-...-...-..........
--:.•••.•
nu t iaoo: t
irooD
r Ci lL enJ. Iiv r�T Jr I.2JJ
....
5bq
S•a]5 I;m rr30a t vvgr
..•.
.........................................................................
t
Hrlr t
)vrlr t
1
13111 i---laiia)l
•,-�,��•_• _•......
5gr11 1Ziv]M I H1Laf 1 r0Z
z9U :
H120a1 I
01 OLNCRAL PYND OR 12 C345114LYCI -SID-
• � f
f� wu Ui, aP acne IORt00 Oxl Otrisx00-. eY00ET V.0"OK[T 07 ONCCT As Of 10.01 14 PASS
12 n.l0_PILgx---
"ACT OC)COIfnCO -t944 T9ss Ins 1Ns .• .
_-_______. _ Ion np I984 T.T.O EST OVT PM CJYnCTI
.CTYa-- /CN.�C-IPPIIOP--Os-)1-°4 `' ACTUAL - OCOV.St OCCOnP°"
-"+' •c,/..� _••i•s•le• TCT4 C.RI.L .............................-
DOPTY:
OTOCC IOROTCOCnIL
...................................._...} 6]0] [ !300 I 6100I
OYILH .......... .:_..... ..
.
........
.. �..«
I *JJ] I 6300 I nOC I
...........................................................................-........................--------------------------
-TOILL .kOYNn TM. Dl als: De T tl00 1 6300 1 6100 1
....................................................................................................................................
..............................
............ I n00 I 4)00 I .100 1
Account 4s)0 Other i.provaeanu+
Antoine Park - voter hydrant
Lake Mr.R. - O "
MAL
IT P..n PJnC 0. JO -Si-
40
F
IMA CITY Or ONO
(OPTION 021 DIVISION • BUDGET 00RASPELT 01 OBJECT
AS IF 10-01
BA ''ilY _ a
PABtt1
tl IMPROVE l Coale CUTLAY f0
OIr OC
OBJECT OISCRuruA
U
191915.
1913
l
H 03
--------
1H2 tOfl
lilt T-T-0
CST DEPT
Ron
COUNCIL
ACTUAL ACTUAL
APPAOP 05-31•94
LCTUJL---RIGUCST
ACCORD
ADOPT0. —
_•_a52c
.
BUILO1423 L SIM"TUAOS
..........................................
:.::.:..........
_
I Am I
as?$ I
ITS I
....0 .......
4540szol
:.....................................
...........
....__._. _
.
is" t [
45" I
0ID I_.........".......................................................................»
-
.. .T
I.
............ .—..__lir.««.«.«.
..«._»05r
.......
ifODD { ..D I
{
lira.{............
_
LSfY OTHER LOUih[q
)a)
.............
IfJlt Iltl
.
11312 1 O']9 [
....
llCO I
.....
2I00 i
.... rgls uPI UL rurw
lyn au_
)Sat
...................us
I uws I
fuof t
w]Ds t
..,,, ,.
rout A"OY Yrf IPro Y:Y If:ON
t2SU
.._.
syu gal
Isf1t I ALBS I
[
a. --
TO AN NNTS Tnii rq0
RON
-----
-AL
lvSu 2SAs
)Ss8 i 61a25 t
Il aOf I
a9105 t
Account 4520 building. ad St,u.tura.
hdalnLrt[ation Building -
E3¢trical UMr.d. 100 •A, 10 el[cult
5)S
B.1nNt. drop N. to .ld. entrance
200
Account
ASA.- OaElty ru[Oltar., rl Sturu and lgolpnAnt
.75
NP150 CPU n.a of NP125 - Aden
MALSo CPU at of MP125 - Tln..c.
200
Ph.... fur gor.rnunt bUilding.
00
200
B.Pl.c. Alnk - ranity Adnin Bldg
].
Dohuaidl f l era (2)
A00
C.lcua.mr. (2) for /ln,np
A00
]]0
ACCOUnt
4550 AUrO®t1vA ER.1,mant
4,510
AutoeOna. MAdun (.at) - Aden
DISP truck. .1nOb ..I. - arrant.
0.000
Truck hydraulic. - Streats
i000 .
Truck quick hitch eoupl., _ Str.At.
2.ON
00
Truck hydraulic $..Nr - Str..L.
000
2.2
100
Account
4560 Cth.r art, panant
41.700
Bind .a -strut.
rnun ..r. (11 - Str..ta
Tao
Lavn a err (2) - Parka
Boo
a00
TOTAL
2.300
Aa.105
14 :"PROVE A aUfJ CUTLAY TO Or •O _SA_
Ttl4 CITY OF OS CMO IOPT IOM On
f.
DIYIf [OM• MOST YOP fSNCET.•fT DEJECT AS
or 10.01•24 PASS n.
A SO,F Wef n r�_pfr ao
,
-LID.
CSJCCI DCICRIFY144
"914 , . ton
—.-_ 1932
1Pn nff I-T•0 CST OCPT
.N CWYCiI
ACTUAL
ACTUAL AFPAQP 05•31•84 -ACTUAL - 40YCST -
MORTIS AOOPTN.
cNAYORaIM•Fa...
_1610 8040 PAt4<t'At _ 31000
30000 _ 35000 35200 t 35000 1
f1000 1 1fJCt 1
............................... .................
•.-,
...0
_.Sono_
.........._......._.».::....«......"•______»..»......___�_•__...::._
... ........ 12311
« ....................« ......
10 T10 rof4 Sal s0S4 1 Ttr! I
TIla I Ma I
....»..........»...................................___........»»
463Y OWO PAY166 DIRT FCC!
.... ...................... .»...
so ......_
.................._............._.......
3.3........ s0_ Is 1......
...... I
Tf.1
•••• Torn oseT fu tic! am!
.25 .......?s
.....
wr+o auJ4 ]vlfo aaw : area I
.Tf-1
t .... ..........».........
area aaT 1
.•....•...........«..............•...................•........................................................««................ IJML An]OrU MIS llr l/ln
MO
-DItl 40 4Uf4 nnJ 441)1 ] nl-r 1
a!n I 1!!4r 1
T ITAL 4n 0.JYTi Tnta FU1O
{Orn At" HfSO
••..'-•,•»teM]
Dlll 1 4e2 1 t
42n7 t 4elaT 1
31 C C A a;: 0, 'c"! rr FI OY lc - S J—
laa m1 ar aaeo
1DInoN on
' Dlrts[a•- SUNCT YIBNSNEU By "JECT
AS DI tD-ot-Sa •uE sy
st lvae•re ItEC A33•AT fYN0
0tV N
-
OSCT OESCA]Iit tN
1914
19e5
1911
I913
_.
19e2
1.83
1944
r-r-0
G1
KII
993
CO9Cxl
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
AIIADI
Ofg1-9a
- ACTu4
AceuE3T
- A[CONNO
ADOn A:'--
_,,,... ADNINtSTAATIVC SCAVIC[
PSI
600
400
103
N0
1
a00 [
A00 x
400 1
•••• TDraL P[Asern leer's..
nA
-1 IN*
1-2-0100
[
01 x
IN1
too 1
a3zV JA urtlNc a weu:x nn
a
--D
ev
.1
u
_-----
._.«.______--------- ».
u [
so I
s0 :
so [
•••• tOT •L JA{NT INa.•YB.......
16
N
el
_
'-
.......................................
fl
x
sa I
so [
I
- •u aaro rA:Ac vaL ••-•••-•••.•-•»Aaaf
zeODoa
ro; ltn
--
:a0000
290[Da
--
:e0c00 t
)steep [
2j0oeo t
auY sort ure3m •••••---•----nevzo
rez:n
e/aes
aril+
uses I
rt[vz [
rt0vr 1
72092 1
' aem ewe rm Ae ntnr ru3
ua
w
139
for
419
x
�« _ «- »•»•--�'•
......................__.._......____vr__Da
------
1
is
SS I
fs I
-
$5211, [
R11O 1
lfzlu [
------ ----
------
Nl1 Na 1Ln'ED OCBT A:•
.
-----
-------------- ..»_...
_
........................................................
_
I
I
I
I
Aese A[•u.n a Ie1JaC3:V eNTD
)tU
_____
-------
....................................................
t
.. a ::yY- ------
•----___...
-n•s
,
..:.ATI i.:; l:rt1
a191a
le•»f
lnlr
•nnL
10
lzalae
» - I
-
T
IOnL ...:.
a
1
)/at
ASliter1Trr
---
lr.•[)fef.r:
---------- .__._._...-.
..... ....
•••
......•
...... [
.Rfv 1
4 1906•11 sPtt a:Swi low DV a _sy_
+994 C[T l'OF ORONO
40-TION Gil p"to ..... ...... YOAN. K f •er OBJECT as OF I0-01 6
Pact SSA
MR NKC Aff[dfNCFT,_!ylp_OI
Y, p]
19li Iq]
19A r-M1O 1144
Ills 199S IM
• .��
AtfvI --IM.L --
aPlRps pS.S1Af' ACTUAL
R[OOL eT RLC O^Np-COOUNCILL---- -- "-
,o •�x. ,,k,.dl.)�PT�R`. ,!_t13f
10AtNISTalglf SE4Y1CC
200 SS
..............................
-
_ _..._.._«._____.
- 220 1
:..............................:......:.:::.....«..�..«_«...«_...
223 1 'TO I 220 [
•••• TOOL PERSONA[ St RYICCA
.«._...]
200._'_....
.....
SS.
flit IRIAT[F6 9 IFB LIC FIF6
• ���'0""""`•""`••"`•`••«--���--���-+.
a110 ROIO PRI A[t)!1
.._.........._
fOJO] if0]0
)S000 )SC)J 75000 1
.. « . «
T.... I
........................................«.........__..._
I
':.
alep east Ixrtetfr
)f]pl eoaav
.. .....................«..__.._..._.._.....__....__.
HJN SI2U )1CIe [
..... ........
Bosse 1 64615
••
-•
t N6Al I
a0)Y nJ'1C PIT:\O AOi9T FCC!
q
.....................................................«
n se
................................
le t
u l 1p t 1p 1
pwr sorter u. ul ns)u
............................«_
1121e 113342•....••._••...•••••...•...••-.••••_._.«
IW41 1
..............«.._.
uUM t L{nal t tll)N [
i ][v
......
•.--.•..•«•••«_•••
........
.................. .....
................................................
1
......
INga t I{af)9 1 169)l ]
TOTAL AM:.N1: 1^[f FU,0
1)Ifal ISf)!2
...... ......
If:S13 11l)N �• •••��'�� •�• " "'�"•
......................................
S 1S)!)S 1
1{f9)I i taa9 /9 I +a{9/l I
Is 19F0 S.CC CISLiSY-IT FYFO Or )J
-TS—
s'
- - 1VOR CIrI or ORONO tMrlM tul OS91S)M-- &OUNCE xMxtrCCI -Lf OLYCCI AS Cr 10-01-046 _ PASS 5-4
. A 19x: cc_�s)caxc
/'�P•I cLJCCI OLCAIsI{Cx _---19 4 __.PACs 19I4 ills
t9L= I'll19Lf PI-0 Csr MPT RN COUNCIL
—'-- -- - ACTUAL- - ACTUAL- PPAOr Os-JI-L( ACTUAL- ROK))-"-NfCONxO - LOOxix:-- --"
�•i 1131 AM(NISIRq IVC SERVICE 1 120 t 120 1 120 t
—.:.....:.............. ................. ......................... 4-.«--»..»......... -»
.... TOLL PERSONAL SERVICES I ... [ ..............0 f 120 I
.....-....S.S..-...
$0000
NtG LONG PRINCIPAL ! ... 00 1 .cocc.... S ..... 1
.....«.................................................................................1...........-.-••---..«...... --.-.... ......
fa0 LONG INICRpt 11019 lbl9 I409 1 --fL ! JNU I 36111 I
N!Y LMC N11 MS 16(MT rer) ♦I JO 10 1 100 I 100 f 1W I
...• IOTA ...I ....... I=! ..... 1JN9.1 ..IN...........I....)
.SM 4....... 1.11 CIV-SIGs....... ................ . . ..
IOtfl IxOJ NtS toil LSV{PION tffff .tsoi*.... ..... 1 .....still I ... I I ......
ICLL ANYJNIS .... ... 1JfH ISON 16669 06113 { fa!! 1 ..... I
11 IN92 [AEC " C:)H'IC 9ufto OV CO _Sb-
--
IIBa
CITY OF ONO
YVTION 023
O]%fION-- BUDGET NORNSNCO -BT ONCCT AS
CF tO-01-04 Iuc•r7>
F
IMO _FUND ___. Yf Y, 90
+,L1W9N_OTCO{T
(9� MJCCT
OCSCAVIION
1982
1985
tvet
T-T-O
IOBt
[SI
199S
OVI _
-PE.UESI
/ON
AQ
HOJ
COUNCIL
-
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
AYPROP
OS-31-34
ACTUAL
REM O
ASSATM
1100
3ALARICI-R!OUW E11rLBT(e
1219,
44945
$3565
21420
SMIS 1
ISM I
$5500 l
55500 [
----------------------
---..-.--«..............
---------- «.. --- »---- ......«
.......---------------------------------------
- t11i
OYMIIN!-ACGLLAR CRALOTrr
..--
AC
110 1
230 1
230 I
230 1
.....................................................................«..........................--...........................»..«
112Y
SALAAL93-ICAP "-L*ICCS
lisso
10I50
11000
20_6
12003 1
»...........
1156) I
................................
11560 1
14560 I
..-.... «....
« .........
llJl
......... .........
YatLI(Oe 'AT 1.109 1511
»..............
..........................
.......---
1f2----•------1
---
--. 1-
..I
------- t ----
t18
------xEOI•
Att J Al Ptl 1rA00 HAl
•-.-310e
2.H
...---�0
----- --__...•_�
�..«•
N]3
t[cP Pn o{u0 van
15w
_tl{L -
ts
ut
I
t
[
----«-.---
u1e
olYer ex uAat vrn
101
11
1i
1-?1
[
(
1
auv
AGNmuu.nrt suncE
.zsx
2u4
ts0>
eza
zsol t
ni0 t
nro 1
2n0 x
................................................................................................»............»..»..«._......_«.
11 {1
s..+..... UIt1i....OY
.... i
...f I
Q25 t
...) 1
U4E
RC:-C:IT CCYTA:BUT IDY
....
1At
....
1F'a
....
e9S
...e
•^f
214, 1
2035 I
2C]S t
x01S I
Uf1
1-0SG:TAW LY.C\ :YS V.iAY CC
-
3266
39J5
40I1
1..
....
)-O] (
SOBU I
.. t
ev
L:R 1`:uRAA: •.
liE
EA
1S4
12}
Sao...
... I
]M 1
... 2
...................
..........................................................................................................
41U
.1YA•PIS WR. p6y.aKC
.%
S-
qi 1
112E [
---- I
1120 1
---O t
•..•
ICTR Jtr SOY4.......
1321
l53'e
---
e1J12
---
36131
71510
eve
-SiN 1
NI/C [ _
tx1Y (F F:CL SLYvI:CC
3Y
EIS
!JC
1"
9- I
)% I
... (
... i
u]Y
STG.0 Jvgil: N. )Ylal6t
"0/
A•Y
E)0•l
41i
1)00 1
IOU] t
1100 [
It00 i
te1
BLDY L 6.OU.93 •!A
Ill
!r1
6Y0
1{
SO0 I
...
I CE 1
6CC i
HS2
...PLT
tOWPNCUI a.Ai. 1 .::CS
`
!
IS ]
1
I
1
........
124E
......................................................................«.:.....__._:_.................«....................
rOY{+ • --- ---- 1
2S
2f
IS)
1 f
All
150 1
............
ISO I
.....................
..........................................................
•...
••
TCTSL iUL::e-YL:1••EFI:
WS
z1rt
.......................................
3153
64,
229s
2601 1
...».1.19..0
21CO 1
..I .....1.19.+....«..«............
2610 1
.U..)4.
..A.U.O.:.I .N..S .{...:.:.6 .:.'C..:.l .............3..
.......................................
Stj
112s
....1.1.9..)
.O 1
«............
I
............... «....
..............
••••
..................................................................................
IO taL IAYFCS3:]RLL SERVIC
$33
Sao
1125
i-IS
te00 1
1191
11%
-------------- -----..-
Ilse I
----»-...----------«
..4..3.x..1.
....T...[C.L.S.VT...A.M.O.O.0 .Y..C..................»..............».............S.1.a.6..
.............».B..f..23
................1i.}0..]:.
........I.l.i
.......•--
--------•-:
._.-......
113_1-...3W..i......00.[
-....--.
..I.
.....
%1
.-»1.-..--.-----..----
.........1.5
if
...
....
TO!AL CLMCN: C:T:0Y1
A01
615
20
W
11^ 1
all 1
SIS
AT I .
_
- IS L:021
Y•!RATIRO FUND
Or W L]WM
STORC
IN'
Call 0P oaWO
COPTION 02)
0111ISTOl
- WOKT w•xsear
-sy ow.cT AS
OF 10-01•e4
rage Sr..:'
n LIWpn
OPCAAYI\0 AYw _._. ..
Dal+O Ll ouC1 eras
--11
—
_ -�
-.
1C
T g2SCAffTISx
I4
Ills
ir
� a
Ills
Il
Iosz
n
net
r-r-0
C1
c
--
ACTINIC '
ACTUAL
IPPROP
05-31-44
ACTUAL
ACgu•.•T
alconNO
..
AVOPTN.
,«-
Isla
PAILTIt10 f-SLICNIw
72
Ifs
75
139
ISO I
in t
175 [
ITS 1
_
__
.
..............................»..........«......:........».................«:.............«.................•.............».
U23
IOvfATl1In4
AS'
IC60
1200
400
1-
ISO) I
_tsoo I
ISao 1
.......................................................................
• •
TOTAL AAIn It AC-PY WIfWIO
426
1215
ZITS
_----1300T
110
...........«..----------------»-------.----».
"so 1
167S I
I675 1
16?S I
«....
..............................................................................................................»..».....«...
Ulf
uT IL: R[f
....
NU
....
U01
1
...0 [
5}OO I
.... ....
••••
IJ AL YT[LlI1C!
RlS
Up
SSW
1601
SJ09 1
faJO I
3200 1
5200 I
all}
LCMTLL
1Ic0:
...Vf
II{00
is 00
uv00 2
IfJO] I
1f000 t
1500a I
..........................................................
....
TOM ACr i1L!
tuOJ
111?s
14f00
.U)
t
15000 I
1f000 1
...
.!S..u.:.M..C.M.T...............Iu
.............................
.t........ ...............
i.0o
t0 I
I
- I
Ise I
LJu"Ety
...
ISO
$$I
su
45
t
---
a)) I
--
ICI
a]JI
{Jo
Ncxy FLoO! A faaun0s
156E
vet
RW
ssl
I]c^. [
u0] t
nrn
nos t
•
TO UL cry TaICI n<IL•ACP-:
a0
iOSc I
CI.^LA1 :L.P.•..JL..C.
- I—
----
.S
40
--Z
........._....Taco..
....................
u...
.C:.I..g..0..'L..f .f.lA..L......•_-.I.x
........-...........................__....._.....
I_E)]
1645
i
fn
E]5'
2203 1
2200
2}CC I
.............
T
Ebf
t;;
sat
1
2SJ}VAL
also 1
2150 1
«..._
.U•.• .S.S
...............................••--__.................................._------._....._....................................
4156
xL LitY•J •c IY T•iC.OIL:
I's
20.
6]J
}❑
ill ;
IJ] I
200 t
icc I
...._..a.....o
•
...........................................c...•.....T.T••.To_.._.._..TT.......a.«...o......T..»--•..•.•cc..........
TO}AL IIFC\ LCYIi KI :L--
Ii5
2Jv
600
tU
]]:
I00 l
TOO t
ICC I
uiu
Ja:Cm we-.L:n [rsYA
Su
eq
6L1
an
aat :
lm
SIFT—
--- t
.......................TT..-.....a.......•.•a•-.T............
aJ II
f•�� ail i:;:N lr4t
Ef .....................
2i: T.T.-..-.•l5
1 ..•••.
.T....T......
!0
.....-"-•_-T.TT......T
3: I
aln
w•:xJ ^..0 leJ•caGc
---
--
is
26
11
)C t
)J [
Uii
VxfA^ L: L::Fll:a :YSYL
uw
Ie60
xSJs
1]J
100
1
t
s
f1fF
'Ja:Y SFa :\]Ui f•rCC
21fi
J+el
tSJ)
]•a{
llaa
Ills
Ills :
Ills I
»-----T.
..-.-.....
U)I
._...
tVIDuaG ACC xI :f YUYO
...........
-.
-
b]b
IW i
.. ...._...
]I]
riC I
•
TOI4 aylu6{S
CE11
♦HI
210
-ell f
IISs 1
IISS I
VSS 1
H!J
Pb•it/Sn:P!
.
I13
-
iS0
----
NS
:ES J
1}f I
1af I
U/I
O..................4
..
1
..
}0)
al
1
...
its !
... 1
Ea! I
TI LAW)'
)Pte.t1A4 FV0
OV W LIWCA
STOAC
—52—
a
-
1914 CITT DI OR CYO
IOrTTON 011 DINIStON•• IUDICT NORKINCIT -By pSJCCT
AS Of 10 CI If '
i ]I Ltj�LON_pPSN. rIX4_FYIID _O
SY f0 41M A lIq[
OIJCCT JCS<gI rT ION
_—
--
•�
11R HI! I91{
-ACTUAL
ftlf
1t13
lQ3
PIS 1
i-�
AITUAI IPPAOv 0s-i1.14
-Nciu.0
NCOV!1f
q(COIgIXp
CWNCtL
SoafrL. - � -
••,•.•-...'M. LICENSES 1 T..E3
93 1t If
..
'
•t
11 t
!S (
13 1
H f
••.• tOTIL OtnCq Cl: Noll
.
!JY•••••••..r.........a...a.is._........r...«_«_...__.._«.
...
-
........... ..............................
...........
(
t
... I
I
l!!Y OTICI IrigDYVEYT!
............
.....$' __...__..._
.
... ��
••••••••
_________ ............ ____
...
..... �•••• .•• .�......�
.........«...................................................
131 I
IC CS I
1000 I
ICCC I
{SfY OII K[ fYq MI 4i-(OUP
315
........................................
.•..•._.._••••...•...
1
1
I
1
flea Dixcq EOu[rrcNl
._..._.s........-OJ
h 1303
.—
.............«_..
.............
--- ..---------- «
...............................«.....
........... .........
S
t--- J
1
4000 1
•........ CArt].L WL.I
••_••••••••••...........
If0] ICS
....soda..._....•..._.....
---
"r...«...«.......«.
........_.a._a.a_...a.............«....a...«.a............a
JSD I
s00! I
fOCC [
SOOD t
0I S'ouNl
1n• IILI uca JJf
IU9
Is4D I
IsaJ 1
1s aD
•••• lO TAL YfN4 D: ■Un ICXCNTf
Il lr I]H IlJ4 A6
u33
.............................................a.....•...s.•...............
11TAL ANSI qry Tn:1
I
••
130J 1
•• __
_ U00I
J
DO I
L:Y:C JN
��•�a.�
tJ/M{ 11111e f1)!{
IIArI] I
IIe IfO
_ __ _
• • .«......____ .... r..
•• ._• •_ ._•• ••�1Jtt1.
.............a............_......a........................«.
rpH AX)urT: rn]f
!
1l11 fp I
It11 fp I
!U•J
IJS•M 1104.1 ICNSJ NJfA
ILr1 1
1]1tU
...............
............
f
ILIfO
1]U6
TI LIWJ• 31C1.1111 NV DY •C LIOUfJ f•ST[ _sq_
Oft 7 46
PERSONAL SERVICES
FUNCTION _
FUND Liquor
O�eratinq
D1_VISION_
Liquor _
NO. OF EMPLOYEES
1984
1985
1985
POSITION TITLE
PRESENT PROPOSED
ESTIMATED
PROPOSED
APPROVED
Marager
1
1
26,288
27,340
27,340
Asst. Manager/Clerk, Full-time
1
1
L4,576
15,160
15,160
Clerks, Full-time
1
1
L2,501
13,000
13,000
or
To,rAL
53,365
55,500
55,500
Clerks, Part-time (shows. as temp.
employees)
14,900
14,560
14,560
Capital Outlay:
object 44530 - Outdoor sign
1,001
1,000
abject 44560 - Cash register and
shelving
4,000
4,000
-60-
1N4
CITT OF CITING
car Tom
021 OIVIStaL•• BVOGCT VOIFSMCET -BV OIJEC.
As Or 10-01.54
AOE G/
_ R YAIEi OPETJrf.4 FUND OIV 91 JSTIA
OCPINTNCS+
_
OBJECT OESCNiPTION
19AZ f1E1
ACTUAL ACTUAL
1N4
A -PRO,
r-T-O
05-51-e4
1934
ESL
ACTUAL
INS
ofor
REQUEST
1995
man
NLCONNC
1945
COUNCIL
AOePIA.
_. ,• all.
.............................
JAL AAIES-AEIILAR T.-LOIE:
....................................................:..............
STITT
3061
12,99
1204,
tago., I
.193) I
If9N I
tIgoe [
'It'
......................................................................................................................------------
IVEAt;.E-AtCMM Em.L]re!
.9,
4P
Sao
Tel
$03
$30 1
..............
Sao I
............... »....
Sao I
UIU
.....................................:.............................._..............................................................
SALRIf ES•T:Ii lN.ICICii
9
25
H
102
132 1
100 1
ICC I
{111
........
V.C.TI01 PAT A..00 911,
.........•...................a
rat
.......»...................
Ift3
101, [ 1 1 1
usz
............•
.a4:],a •u 1......v
......................................................29i»............•____.......»....._......»....................
..
1...
..............•..............»....---------I--
f
1
1
----------------
1
4UJ
SICf •t+ ,AC, 991
!zt
Hx
...
I ! 1 f
Aw
................................................
3nv P.. 1:4a; Yrn
T
I
I
I
a1H
ICN;•::; •..I: Yi is\Y: Ci
SU
T
.•..........._...........................:.........:.......................»....
f•
S+v
ISz
.
61. 1
2fe3
AID
AS^ I
HU
..........
•E F. Car CC'.rn atiT aY
TU'
.....
3p TS
..
toll O06 •
•EIS] 1 2Na I TNC f
UR
RG c;n CS'I I:.:SYii(V
1t12
....
Ita
ttl6
....
piS
-261C---
T:fl
t11S I
...
2 •
1fS
........ ......
A 1lS
......_.......___......•
...............................................................:......•..:.........:....................
vIn I
---[
[
TOSS I
15
Itl
13L
SI
IIC I
13_ [
----
120
13C
i SJ JI.•:Y. Ca. :•.Yu :..
.fl
....
ia•
I
P:A.:.:- .:::.
.0 sf
4T'S1
Jt.
....
s. T]
....
s233f
.?295...
SET )s
...S
................
<26
•..•....
TrpE :L c:C CF
................................
11
..................
14
Ia)
S2
-:ftr
1•:
1]!
1 0
..... ................
ICT [
u2.
......._..
.p r• ..... 1 .n \: [..0
...................._................_.•...........................____........_....................i»....................
•.0
1...
..................•..:
........:__.......
r
111^
_.................•...........
1503
Isec
........
:[a ...Lt -w::
...........: .._._:.....................-.r
Jos
SIT
..r
ses
...
96
ds: 1
n! I
na
ss• I
113.
......._...._.._...
i \ .-.':,a •\a :u...l
......................................._;........._....___.....__..__y_._..._._...:_..__.
31
......;.:_...---------------
is
_---------
"T
.__..._.__..
Is,
_._
Ili
Isc
............
........ ..1... .................................................,AS........................................................
aAa
YC 1. rr ;r5:'A ..... ....
l...
....
.,AS
a..s
••
eT li
uta
TO IA. 1 aC.....................
...
..21
31 I
......
IT
.it
t3
••••
.....
1f:nL sJ..L t: ;-+: :Y •+Ea.•
......................._...........
III,
f1J1
---- ...
I,"
SIR,
.y.s
9psr
5.51
9657 i
{r}.
JV E::{I. . 1:!,vd :fl
SAS
------------------------------
415
]J.
0f)
»_......
a.]1 :
—..•__.......------�------..._..--------
95:
032 1
Flo
41.3
................
.......... a:!: fii V:LEi
..........
17%
il•
......._.............................................................
11.
IJ
13C
IC• I
0Y5
....................................................................................................................................
i4J p1EL:N'I :(!i. LfIYO
1515
All
113)
1
1'••
1]'• 1
in I
............... . .
ICOC I
It 4LrN
u,O O9
91 Jzft&
OE°urYENT
-i(-
ro-
_
n-
A% 1 4
In,
CIR or GROAN!
(OPTION 921
o:YSslOx•• BYDC2T YJANSPCET -II NJCCT AS
Ci 10-01-I4 PAGE is -
R WATER l9ERITIF4 IVID Oil
91 YATCO CCIARfW..4T
-
' OBJECT GCSC11lluch
19s,
IRS,
HIS
1911
HIE
1915
1914
T-f-O
EST
am
IGR
COOFCIL
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
A.. R1.
75-11.24
ACTUAL
ROUES(
ACCCNIO
AOOPIN.
OYG
.................................
*'OCR C:4SUIII'.) SC4VICES
...............................................................................
Is$
Sf0
JS0 I
359 I
550 1
1SC 1
•
....•
TOTaI PwJfCif; )YtL ]ERY:C
...................................................................................................................
11G]
too?
155C
9S2
2230 I
1499 1
44co t
... ... .......... ...
aloe I
4524
TELPFJ'IG
431
$64
Sao
196
51C 1
$12 1
Ste I
STO I
q]1
e03 it B[
212
31S
32]
IST
;;;,1
its :
s25 1
]25 1
»._•.........................•.............................................•.....^^...............__.........«....................
•
..................•..........................___....._.......
IGtX CJNRW:UT[JYI
!II
1)V
its
191
MS :
all I
Its t
$95 1
LL12
IR;Ai IFG • [U IjtNIW
Its
.....................................................
SC
10 I
A 1
So I
........... ......
$) 1
..................................................................................................................................
•
IOI IL ii ;y l:'.G--J9L i5N•15
ITS
5i
S] 1
5) I
SO 1
f9
tilt
Yf:U I:;s
I1191
IVNt
1f J)^.
RC IC
M2SC [
1Sl JC I
1lICO
U000 1
• .
lOia v^L:q :!
1l1]1
1DG14
1•:2^
6.•R
1Y251 7,
, I A-9,37 i
II9C0 7
I4s^.0 1
O]1
WY;[D`".i ♦
12f
12s
lEf 1
12S I
12S i
•
TOlfl 'AE rtµl
IR
l%[
In
tsS :
f2S 1
Ut.
a:➢I lee:(: L.Y..-.•IT
1.
f;
11
S1
S: .
fR
S^. I
..
U41
.14,
..... .).. Oa:•r'Yi
. ....... .........•..
!12...
I;ll
...
9S2
I
9S9 I
.J..
1
Na:'.1 -W. `-ti
JN
1.........
D--
.
...
..
...
.. ..
TES) I
__101) :
...
^.
I
.^........ ...
I
----
ili:
[ Ky! f aqJ y:i
2S
tl
---
I:i
---is,
----
:
----
ICI
----
j
J41
4:•.r .rl ci U;.' l ^L ta}
H[I
2)51
5•"
--
R'9
---
b[
...
li ]. j
J1CR f
--:
lIV:
..................._...
..
.............
.....__...
• ......
.. .. .......• ....................
•
T^l:- Ct'. ii l;i Y. iA-r OD :2
54i
4t/)
•1c!
9d4
•130
G2f5 :
GrsO '
Ir5) 1
USl
L[a iJ-::•:'. i. r
r:
1^C
I
.GC
rd!
[.. ...•^:I. ....
...
...
...
..]
...
u>f
0,:. /.. ,; E.::..
... 1?1
..1
'SC
D..
Too
1
':..
1:11
...
...
fN
INJ
1
I592
.Sea..
LLCC
4:1a
rq .C-0.:i •,�-J:Li
V!
IS'
.:H
i5'
If5
ILS
-D2^
1f)
1H
2$C I
USu
p•S •-bYI L;
1!!I6
1R.V
.a L'.
i'S5
I16
A14:
!9 ))1
2i llf
I.•''
....
l.. ..........
.. ........ "....
I1
...
I1
...
...
1..
-----
...
92.
... I
71 .liii
J°[i. T: LJ 11,19 0!
D1 .":A 9!DJ
tlfeq•
-La -
7 7 i
I", C(TT GF OIIOic
I2 Y{TEB GP:unn) FU•IO
CBJCCT OCCA:PT:IN
IM PROFIATI ILSYRANCC
IOP110. 02. DIVISION-- FYDGET YORAS.EET -By OBJECT as OF to-01-01
D(Y 91 WATER DEPARTMENT
1-81 SSTs Iles iM
1902 IM 1.51 .-T-D CST Dcri FAR COUNCIL
ACTUAL ACTUAL ...Rol e5-31-84 ACTUAL ALovl IT RCCCNPO LDIPIN.
2% 153 iso 750 )SD t e40 1 to 1 TLO 1
PAGE 6D
1513
IWIPPEAT FLDNLAS :N3UR
S
s}
is i
10 1
10 1
U}l wr(AOT1 vc rlsca3MCE
az
us
}z}
T{z
)u 1
e}s 1
ecs 1
•os 1
O
UA!{;LL{ LAn:LaY •.
let
fv
Ss
9)
9O
1Ds
tH I
lOs I
«_____________________._____________________________________________________________________________«____..._....__.__.__.___._
..
UN
IN3R..IC{ foci OF ...:o.O
2P
1
ett i
us 1
elf I
•
IOT4 :'.:IM.'K Lf
LLsf
ne
I139
2111
...
2111 1
ills i
}t )S C
3135 1
ales
PAC •lCRu:Ps
U
n
fo)
le
lo•`
U) I
lo;
100 1
Ufl
f11A Y;t•A:L!{OL-•y\B t'10
U
Lf
it) 13
.OD 1
2)) i
)DO (
-CC I
6e1
LIE. T:i L TAV:!
f
219
IS
ai
lS ;
')f i
)s S
IS S
•
t•1:: • :......
US
Ps
I
...
...
...
...
lS2Y
I.0 a J:': i5 a Jb:WneT
i13
{HL
aY i]'ti i'YE f. CY::Y251
1{C)
{••2
flfn
lSe.
...... ....1
2}S.
....
.
_.............
rD u. :.:: n. -^'L:•
...........................................
...
f+D.
......................................I
Ai Ai
...
$:S-
r1A
2)12
....
rrSJ f
...........................
............
ULP
UH
♦fQ '.
..................«__«_.«......._____
2{q S
.... 1
•
TCI :: :aq C':.3
$012
.1.1
---A
.T.O :
.
2--- I
2AU t
?AliNSY
•2rt.15 f •C .'v\-C«:'•I+
13
j
...
- .............................._..._..................._..._•_._._._..._..___•__•_.___._.___.___.................
......................................................................................................
•
IF SL :iTIAiE4C'."S
!A
I!•e
2311
TII}
\vSt
.«_.............«....
IR TI ; Il sl 1
iCi{L
LRfIYra tn:5 atY;S:^p
ra a)T
Iuf 35{
120121
UlT•
1)l'1) :
P2)Y{ E
1:I. C4 :
1121v1 ;
rl.................
...R
....
......
..N20
.....
IASV :
.!...4 :
.:
.!...
U2)9{
11 ..TEA "TAACL 'U'D 11 11 131:A l!%AAP IN' —43—
i
PERSONAL SERVICES
FUNCTION
_ - FUND We its OAexatinq
DIVISION
Watei OPexat i nq..................
NO. OF
EMPLOYEES
1984
1985_
1985
POSITION TITLB
PRESENT
PROPOSED
BSTIMATBD
PROPOSED
APPROVED
Public Works Coordinator
231
23%
7,860
8,165
6,165
Utility Foreman
41%
40%
11,050
11,210
11,210
Mechanic
2 @ 40%
2 P 40%
18,195
18,925
18,925
Utility Billing Clerk
20%
20%
3,395
3,600
3,600
TOTAL
40,508 41,909 41,900
Capital Outlay:
abject 44560 - Water test kit, dehumidifiers (4)
2,750 2,750
-64-
1964 CITY 01 ONGNc
•• __ A SEWER )NL.•TINO +YNI
Maier OESLN:.r ION
(OISOB H1 a:ri St ON•- BUDGET JaNNINEET -BT OBJECT lA ax 10-01A1
DIV 12 SEVEN DE.IATKIT
Ivez 1983 Ivfa T-)-B
ACTUAL ACTWL a..NON 01-31-e4
EST T OAST tves OVr NGN COUICI
ACTUAL •[OYLBr NLG ONNY •MlTmpONfN.
AIJY
SAI.NtES-NEGULA WWTLE
42.0
1955.
Sxnf
20"1
SI?4Q I
WIN) I
SEIM i
5e4CO I
..............
...........................................................
.................................... .........«_«....«__.
+ ant
Or[NTI NL-A[OLLP rNNL31to
ass
133e
1300
IS)
1350 1
I.So I
"so I
Ilse I
......................................................................................«.......-________-.....«.__._...----------._
t12V
LUNZ ES -TEND [naLar!ts
xf
Si
31
fC )
f] I
I
Sv f
—
lul
r]c.rt :r wn I:.Ja'se Jl
nii
nn
S
tn]
rat D.T sO li N4 +H.
.Mf
tSas
a)z
I
s
1
NS!
.I GS Ov. I.ye v.r1
na
la)
I
[
aua
:rr"v. i.vaf .r31
. Il
!
---
I
I
1
32.
l:)
S.
1`t
I!S
.a) 1
BMI
AO" I
al al
a- L!ir �: .n;oYr Lr
1VI
3115
•Ots
lt+v
]fls
Ie CJ 1
IN0 1
Il•a
x.NS
Use
tuns
:... 1
I
t
----
----
----
.
:---:--Gs
•aef
----
x±--
+n
----
xro: 1
all)t
zr)v I
al fi
-----
LSC .....;...
.af
-:--
Oat
u,
n`
---IS2
---1 Is
ITS 1
ns
alfl
..E <•y:i - :vi YtsC
31
].x
•]+I
IS41
I",
xllf I
x115
ills I
••••
.Jfry .:'SJ :.L :I44::[!
fSlla
6fSa9
0uA!
241 i.
]El of
---5
-----
rxxal S
uil
[L'i.l':4 a -..L :aY?
YS
a^e
Ri
11+
lxs I
I
... [
!O I
---
f[J1
9U:. JV•.4]J •<a ;vw LT
!+
!?
1:
1?
I
I
t[!}
IGr:-r•n( :-:•t' <
tall
3fN
say:
yl
1'N
IJ is
MOa 1
]OCa
.. i..... .. ....
...
.
'Sit
....
.... S
.... I
.............
.
Icy;, s -
PAPA
.!
NIT'
ISiS
..
Nal
....
----
...J
--: •
.....----
- 1
... .......
....................
...........
.
..I.........
. .....
.. ...
L
..
.•
-
11.'
1---
.11:
I1I
.... «................
-............_...................................................................
IIU3
......
!...aU :". ..
.!
.
If
..I
I
............
...
airs
....
u.;:•:.t :b<:u:. u:•..
uu
n)?
rt
---D
n:)
1:--
----
13 SEVEN L0.1I:10 Pula 11
.2 9C.ol
"'A'AT.[N"
—Lr—
/ 1964 CITY or am,
TOrrt*N 0b
DIVIS101"
SYD<Er rsstlrttr
r1 SLLCA DP!
- N143 rryrD
Clr vE
- eT DNLCT
AS 1, tD-ol-ea
past iL
SLutf
CElU hpIT
OBJECT Dr S:.IITICI
-
'
Nlt
evsl
I'll
_
T I 0
1°S{
•SI
Isis
WSf
Visa
ac,.,
.CTD+L
+Sp SDI 013 11-s{
aC)VJL
DE°r
CCv
CDVIrCIL
•••• ionL p2 ucsst ru{ f.ara
s:es
gOYE iI
/tt<Sp0
+OWN.
...•..............._.
fRr 1 ................'ta
.•....1-9
---- ..•...
__
----
lave
___ __ __
f
---
... t
b90 (
21fo I
..........................:•_.......
ISO
alxl .......
...------
.•...
rl.
••••••
r1.
.....
1
•..................
Stf 1
siS
••.. To," C+.�Su{: C:i: DYx
......__.__
I...
1.Y0
....761
I sif I
..................
..............
...1
1f1••••••••••••••
i
le)S (
16 )f I
le)S f
.._........••.............•.._.........
•... TOIJL i2:sP n8.r
..........................
.D
...
f0 I
.....................
>0 1
.........
SD [
..................•._...........__.........52
a:..__._..
.let .I:L:.:tS
....^......._
T
30 t
st I
.................................
)eE.
.......................'
Its.
It]C.
)HS
lti CD :
.............•..•............
11202 I
taaOD
.........._......
I
IaECC f
1 >1f
fl)
............................»....._.........
4..L ......J
—...•....___.•.........._load"_..".
1f 15
t2)d
f1.{......
'-:IT :ii :.: i.J a.'
.....................
.............••........._._.
al
__ _________'_� _
• • . ------.................
1D I .Doe l
tact I
................Ir
.........
f]
It
to
>lI«.........•
I
a]I's t
.J : .....»._.
l{a2 \+•YI .: 3C vlt :>rtnf
119
•2 TIY .............•.......................................
��•••••
.. .
ta0 I
......_. ._-. ....................
...............................................................
fDi
Eft
qJ
U:
..
.....
liWWs
(
$00
sC0 t
..... ................. ......................................
I
••••..«
to
...............
.............. r
1f0
L]'rt e..14 lr{r::>t
Ilia.
V a
.......................
f
.... 1°i.. ...... .....a ...
C-"
..........•......
.......••......•.....•.....•._.•..
.....:
rlf :: I
ICsoO
tOfCC
.......... ...
. .... ... ...................:...
.r-:
tJlf1
................
I....
t.)I]
1lSr
2H 1: I
In.............
Irea _• I
......._.
IleW
«..«..«....».••_..
RSK
3...•:r. ....
sS'
A`
..............
__ _
ASS '"'o
......_•.._..---------
t
ofl MVCfi_::u '3i:Y.
.::..
••
E.f
...............I
I
H1 1
._....... _
vfS 1 "
..._..•......................
.is 5
J
a•.....-2f
_ ___
_
r
s t
a..
..».»..»...._».........
25
........ ....... .. ..........
efa
--___
.
__ ___
............................
..n
I... I
...._.
IeL.
lee]
... _..__...... _._............».....
2122
0M
t
.can
-...
. ... a r-:.....
....
I
re.: ]
H.0 1
...
Yt
x0•.
st
---
...............
aj;ff
. ..
.....
)]S '
t-1 I
.....................
-))J•
.......•.•.............................
va
IS I
---
.S
........
xix
_ _....
_ ............................
I
If
............. ..
...........................r
. s
10 I
.
la I ._.. .«
..» __
.......................................
..
... .........«.
• 17
ae•
I984 CITY Or 06cN0 WIr[ox OL OIVISt ON-- BUDGET SPROCKET -31 ONCCr AS Or tO-Of-La rILC L%
'•� J-SC%EO,grCXATIx) IWO _o1V 92 f(VSX_O[r�._IEXT __ _
. _— _____._.
• C1JCCT OCSCXISTIOY :-
C..." •' _.._ 1942 1933 1934 T•T-0 t151 EV1 IISM COUI RL
- - ICTVIL" - ACTUAL ArIX9r 0S-3f-34 ACTUAL - ACOUTUT RECTUMS A00OTO.
Jll•f•u."^. •vH� !' 4311 VIIM[LLA LIA8111TY /NSYX 212 I)i 110 Ito 110 I IV I in 1 In I _••...............•.•............._..••...•......•«:.:«........•.-------------------- ----.....•...:..::.::..•«•....•«::.•.. «•�.
q.. I....... 1...1 Or .....0 SU 1 Elf t 255 t Ill I
.......................•........_...-........••........•.-..•.....••.•......-.--•-.........-............w...•«.........•.«.«•«. •... TOTAL IXfYAAa[/f --- --•... I...- - ...Ol--..--IRE)--.•••...f ..•.1i:f-f. it" I 1130 1 1130 I
..... ...................' .......«..«..w.......««. {l/[ x[ISSSfXi rf 24 f0 f0 2 S0 I >0 10 I
IUI IX AY[L•M:Li/6[-q..... 9 rr 200 11 100 I }OO I }00 f t00 I
.......... ............... .................. .................. ... .. .« ... ..... `� li 3] Lftfxr[t { iaxL3 fav} • e t I t I
USi YNC )L LVpM :xe<x31: V)ft If 1 1 t
4H3 NCC CVMCNI [r1i 0!] if JV 19 1p!v1 URA ITt 11 ISSEJI I I1B 10 I INS," I t39920 I
q96.... f63LL... i.....6 1]11C w!!1• 9zv3• ))rJ_ v}ve•t gSff-I Ilsf 3•t 1}f 35-I................................
........................«........................ ..........................
....«..........«....
119i XY[t•I Nala_ CF Los; )1q IU___ I } f I ........ . . . . . ......... .... .. . .. . . .......................................................... .. .. •••• TOTAL ONGP Cn.i)ff VCS9J 164214 11)IS] P3521 II.C.2 . t,2615 STEM 112613 I
..•• ..................................•.--..--...------_.• f 1
.............•_•__•___.«......................•....«..«.....«...w....
N}Y .......... . i...:TVnpf 14IfJ fIf )I S9p [ t t t
4 S. AUICISTIYi UC.Yeryt 64J" f93• f967 I S 1 I
ISW Ol K• COY lrA:�lt 4S) 4fp 1 I I I
.«. TP t. C.r$lµ :Y•L IT 21 t]• Mti )M Il I f t 1
I6Tdl .a.xi{ L•(1 Y:...... •........ ..... ........................................................
.31 I i34O3 ( .OSrOf t
HILL AX;. •Tf blf ...0 ....... . --- - Si ee 4Hf1 l)R )1 t EArps t EII T03 t 230Cf [
13 TIYCI )r[X4T11: IN.o av 92 Sb]• pV IaT .L N`
o s •
PERSONAL SERVICES
FUNCTION _
FUND Sewer Operating
DIVISION
Sewer Operating ___
NO. OF
..................................
EMPLOYEES
1984
1985� _1985
_ __
POSITION TITLE
PRESENT
PROPOSED
ESTIMATED-_-
PROPOSED_____
APPROVED __
Public Works Coordinator
27%
27%
9,225
9,595
9,595
Utility Foremen
55%
60%
14,825
16,820
16 820
Mechanic
Utility Billing Clerk
TOTAL
2 @ 60% 2 @ 60%
20% 20%
27,295
28,385
28,385
3,395
3,600
3,690
54,740
58,490
58,400
-68-
IJe. clrr AT
:Ju.S. yee.Tle9 FO olvrsrON•.
Sums, Y0..29CCi _el ..CT ..
.. �•. le.leer 0(eC.I VTI ON ... .07Y %_o0L1 COYlS(
.......�.. 1........ICS- ACTUAL HeJ _..."" . _......._'
.L.. 11 .CtYq VP.W 15.i D CS! 19I5 Ie[Q•� i
••••••••••........... .. ..... 11-e1 OLR rflJ _.
f 1r1 .vc ..Tlf[•.L ••••'•••-:_ tarot .. II, .Ciuq I[Quill . Nae CW11c+L
sLl2. zeslP [ccN.!
..............L 9493 26410 .lOvre.'
{Il4 S.l-:d:Li-riF+ ............ ..............[ i}I! .. SO ........... 2)Ief 1
U]t Y.C.TGr Pll Bela.__
- °LOrfCs
............. r-....... ---2VIM1
1 s409 991................................. _...............
If99 (.............
rL:O.II . .............. R1 1SH •__...«. + 912, I 91..: _
r
.117 flt. Nr IgfO Ye 9r..._... }76 .et ................................ ....1
.................. .......«. _ I
axle Dr 4t. is ..........•• I j ..... 11..f3 YYII ..........f...................
.«..._..... .... I -..........
2
tl J4 aON:•.IS I4 fIr1• ................. ......•_.........._._ r ...._. ...
a'If............... . .......I .«.«..... . ............ f .«....
l RC.a. ......................... ..................
..... Cg-. 1 ^_9Uif ON... .. ..................... + .....
............. ................. MS
1461
Isl
_ ....._...._.sle................... .......... .ee<It e1-I...
)9s 1.. -
.....__......__._:CY.r;u<.... lif)Jre._ ..Im II-S
_ life Ills--------------
11 1Sf9 ( It •............... .... G.. ..................... �. If
.... t9 NI S)6 ._.......
............. SJ\al S.iY-.:.... r)'JS ............. �. I. _. ._..........
.......................... 151 •
Izl- of •- iasea _ wt.c _ _ •. ..
�.
l rei
.. ....... _ ar ays aloes ) I-...
a<iC •Gl it fYt ll•1.........._. .. �+ }--..... •.--............ ..............
................................ •• 161•. ....... �.... )e ............
fafef0 -..._
I...CZ: ..................... Ittl CIf TN LY: [ Y . lile I9e9 ......•a er 10: :••••••. If.:......11 r..-..--...:...
-------------------OCX... °.... ..........._........... i]OC_ ...
..........................
ae11 4Uc [ 119 r/9 ...". if9J I 1!J
] + M[ 1
................ .._._...._� �.. re.. : reoc : .
tQP LOr Y.r. Pigs I30 I '.....
t ........
.. 1 ]..L! .... If] 7 ....................
.
... 1
•••• ioty............. 1tJF 5:00 . S20 ••••••••••••�.
t
.. aL"'L:iS-e2td.4 . _ W:• ..... 0 -' 1200 I 12.. + {SU Y-1 •. LR:2IrSe 21Y �. .........«....
_ YC:rIXE < v: ••••••--._. SVaI-• - .51..... >90'[ IJ:n I... t000 :- ••
.................................... ..
...............................................
450
j 301
aA.Y[3+I CY, eN-....... eIPJ C
_ _..._f...._.__.-
{1tL r Ia1 .............. ....... l00 i- elfo ........_.
LL Can:.. IfJ ....
.............................
............ >i9 1 .. ;...........
.ltl a .... _ tC
91I... riff ...------------- _
.................. yJ1 Qf I )t0 I )iJ I rtC 1 .... 2f ................lsf- 1200
..... i0. q................ _..._..so �_ 12s9 r rtf] r .•......_.... _.
................... Y I.. I
I...l SO I f9 + ........
rise ........... .............. so + ................ .._..
a i9li C•V.:f 0aLP2 rf 16 i Rfi I -..--••_• ......
D ...._....... 16.. tl:g DY of ............. ..... �� �. 9 JLf rOV.fC _ 11C0 ! •••.............
UCO 1 ...
�-
n IMf fltl [R
�eOA. lwy:om 02,
1 . CFCNAI: Of Vf [IOX-. N3 l0 O1Y 9! 004E
feJCCT OESCNI.TTCN COYP,SE BUDGET p.NInCET `tr OBJECT
t0-0f-84
' Hat ... 1983 " — R.eC %O
-��.
'.•^+. alit M .CIWI ACTUAL Hef is I
....... urua a... .. ... Sa.NOF S.31. .St _ 7S-ll.sa tpf NO*
U27 .Or*. ale ACTUAL OCFL HS3
T: S: AO __••••. rC011EST NON COYNCIA
..............................». ...-..:....: opt --:--... ... occomme _
_ _ OIK R.• iJSr '•••_•..._.................. .. .-.....-.M.........9N. JD .................. It90 {00 7 -
tlta V1+ Ia2) )91 It00 ...........00-r- 400 I IJSt1200
....1?00 no
1. .............. t f................
. _. rvl ItOC f ^-- -.
•................... 11{1 zfn .»...__...t_ uw
a Nat A ......._._ 107J t
rae7 J:90 ._•__.......l000.+_ Jena t .-.
YtK ...l.. JIIO .....-...
!ah 1363 t._ J000
U{I a:.CC t •-•_..-.. r ....-...-.
J JIf .............."__..._....... _ _
Jrr [aY aNCNI •••••...-.. <fJ0 {90) t t900 [ -f940 (•- •»
lJft aJf .......•............. _ Nafl/ .. I)f .:00 1 a.JD• ....»................ •- »
.saJ Isis .............-......... auto E ay.. "".—
N.:Xr iUtf . ..lYY0J........- S)3 ........ J00 ! 'Coo.... ................. »
to................ '19 exI ........... �. IDOD I
41 11l ....._......
]tfD IJII »....."` 9Cn .._ ....._..... .c, 0]L- .... ............ Jab: ............ $03J I .. f• • ........._ ........_
l�-.._...... t] _ .. ._
5000 :
........... ............. 1C[
)r00 "-
..... S'C ..... S:a Jn. .... I t7l I ......... 100 f .......
....... .. - 1lJl
rhI .t ..».......... IS]{
l rsYe _........._ leo] I
N\AEL.. - ...
l:n oar .,. Jtl 2)) a. f
ITS 11S t 1 _
.............. ...................... lJ I .....j .....;;.f .....-..--.-
.I.YA •.......................... sf.......
tI11 DfJ.:\...... tt JJt 2.0 f -. .._
•.................
tJ rf zsD : ..
<f. _._.. +,- 119 ....... in7_. ID7 ( IIS f .. .-...
•___......-1 sc t� '_
u; ....f. ...._...... ns -
_ �_ rla ..u..ACC9 ...1 H r ..............
......................... t..
a IBC rtr.EA intp llll Itt Ito � ... .... ......
-.-'................ •_...___•_.......... IfS
IJ
.... �n . . _-........ ................i 2f 111f •-...... tai r 1{1 +
............... . .... ......... ........r........ _
_ 723 ttS
It' 2
.............
4399 JT.E. ............... ...... 30•I• .-....
--_........ C.•Rf-..... f0 .-..
Ito ..................." ... . ....»
s71 _ __
It icL1 : .....................................Irf Its I ..
VV.1:: :a:.:r: ty iD .........._ tt_ Its + ....-...
Dr el .
.u. ....-'o-
- cows[ .................... ...__..
I934 CITY CI MORO tIPt10N 021 DIVISION— BUDGET 03RKIPEET -01 OBJECT.• AS IF /0-OI-84 PAGE 'JI
?4 _OOL9 COURSE OP[RAT:NS PO DIV 91 GOLF COURSE
f �•� CWECT DESCRIPTION — -_- NlossI93! IS Sf SSBS
N I-42 13 1994 1-1-0 CSI OEPT NO COUNCIL
ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP O5-31•84 ACTUAL REQUEST ' A[COINO IOOPTN.-'
«...TOTAL OTHER CMAG[f ............ 309-.._._- 349 ...... 399.----_- 349__--.•• 3" 1 ASO I .SO 1 AID 1
n •. .•• _. - ..... ..« ..... .................
.... 1.'IRJVEP.... 1J LANO' I.S 1 I I I ...
AMCPA .. ..........STRUCTURES 1 [ IS.. { ..... .... .... ....
ASSV OTPid :Ni RD ICN [N TS SO7 LSO 1 2000 1 2000 i 2000 1
ASS. WTM.............. I ..... { ....0 ! N0.0 t
.......................................................................................................... .... ..............
...O Otni9 COVIPNCXI 2:92 )S] AO. 400 I 1000 I I000 i 1000 t
IOGO
... lOUL CAPITAL OUTIIT 2452 3T00 SOS 2035 1 MOT ( ISS00 1 MOO I
NSC ICT O'I OC f I[:.[WSE KXTf fA i I 1
• • fcia JIniR 7I MVRy nC b15 N 1 I i I
T Cf al an 2ONt! Tn:f ::V lf:OY SvlN S91H AAf OI Rf9) Of lOf I v2]]3 i 9/200 [ 9)2CC I
....................................................................................................................................
IONL ...... .... SNf1 ..S.f ....1 ..... ..... ( ....0 1 ..... ! ..... [
74 OOLI COVR][ C.C4}: Yl NO OV 93 021.1 COLPii
PERSONAL SERVICES
UNCTION .._
FUND Golf
Course O�ec
DIVISION
GOlf 501158e _________,_-___._____
NO. OF EMPLDYEES___.._
1984----
—___ 1985
1985--------
.... °OSITION TITLE ..................
_
PR_______OPOSED ___
___________
BSTIMA'fED
__ PROPOSED__`
APPROVED_____
,)blic Works Coordinator
88
86
2,735
2,845
2,845
greens Superintendent/Manager
1
l
24,075
25,040
25,040
TOTAL
26, 810
27,885
27,885
Temporary Positions
Summer Counter help 6 grounds help 8,770 9,120 9,120
Captial
Outlay:
object
#4520 -
Garage addition
2,500
2,500
Object
44530 -
Clubhouse carpeting
2,900
2,000
Object
44550 -
Fairway mower (used)
20,099
20,000
Object
44560 -
Clubhouse re Eridgerator
1,000
1,000
-72-
Memo -84-68 /
page 1 of 2
COUNCIL MEETING
TO: city council NOV 26 1984
FROM: Tots Kuehn, Finance Director
DATE: November 19, 1984 CITY OF ORONO
SUBjgCT: Revenue Sharing Reimbursement for Budgeted Expenditures
For the y,nac 1984 th.! City budgeted $67,442 from the Federal Revenue
Sharing Fun? to be aged for Genecal Fund and ]:npcovrnant 4nd F.gair'"
Outlay Font �appnct. To date wa have expended $45,356.34 from bath
funds for revenue sharing purposes. it is recommended that
$26,494.23 be tcanaf:zrred to the General Fund and that $18,952.14 be
ttmisfacc-ad to the improve -tent and Equipment Outlay Fund for the
following 1983 and 1984 expenditures:
1983 Expenditures to be reimbucse.l in 1984:
General Fund
Finance - computer terminal, printer &
work station S 2,677.61
Street Department - hydraulic. sander 2,082.00
Total General ?und 1983 expenditures _4,759.61.
lmpcovesent & Egaip•mant Outlay Fund
Street -)apartment
- Portable 2 way radios
$ 1,319.00
water Op Dept. -
Portable
2 way radios
659.50
Sewer Op Oept. -
Portable
2 way radios
659.50
Police 'Department
- radio
frequency
948_61
conversion
Total Lnpcnve & Equip Outlay Fund S 3,586_61
1983 Expend
1934 'dxpendituras to be reimbursed in 1984:
General Fund - Police Department
Squad room improvements S 3,075.00
Office foraibice, fixtures and
equipment 1,376.23
Squad cars, net of trades (3 units) _17,193.36
Total General Fund 1984 Expenditures $21,644.59
Memo 984-68
Page 2 of 2
Improvement s equipment outlay Fund
Finance - upgrade computer com-nunications
from acoustic coupler to modems
S 1,018.00
auildin9 6 Zoning - conference chairs
793,00
Street Department - dump truck (50$)
- fuel storage 6,313,21
- welder g cabinet 622.56
- tool box for compact 315.55
pick up Lrau k LR4.57
Park & Recreatlon - dump truck (50%)
_ 6,313 2l
Total Lnpn>ve a equip Outlay Fund
i'M expenditures
$15,365,53
Memo 484-70 /3
COUNCIL MEETING
TO: City council NOv 26 1984
PROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director CITY OF ORCNO
DATE: November 21, 1984
SUBJECT: September, 1984 Monthly and Year to Date Summaries of
Receipts, Disbursements and Balances
The attached report reflects the cash activity for all funds of the City
for the month of September, 1984 and for the nine months ended September
30, 1984. The reports summarize by fund the beginning cash balance,
receipts, transfers from other funds, investments sold,
disbursements, transfers to other funds, investments purchased, and
ending cash balances. The total of all funds for each column is
compared to the previous year for the respective time period. The
comparison of the totals is for the purpose of showing the cash and
investments for all funds from year to year.
CITY w 03
SIYMNfY t1F Br1'EflRS, nf591BSAID �3
tUB TBE 141N'M (k' S6YEb mmWN Bt2i. 1984
ilwea ..
'_,ih
T[.lmERCc
inv,93L� w
Tomfers LnuKt'e'nt3
Ca011 LMtstmOlt
Snu.Nl:n+lY.
Sold
Disbresmnta
Out pucd)ased
eaiance Balance
PF33 Balance
Belance
Bxnin[s
...:).
to
. _ ....
......I. .....
...... ... .... _
$
S 139,241
$ S $
1,775,139 $
Oane[al S S
1,822,331
S 77,049
$
75,515
Feiaml Bavanna $Aa[ing
75,545
- -
- -
103,213
RarkR
102,313
900
164
- (4,213)
Sa Wnity xveiopnent Block Great
(4,049)
- -
- -
107,817
FgoiPo=nt .lui lay
107,817
- -
31,766
Bdildial "aptw outlay
31,766
- -
- -
Municipal state Aid ConetOlCtiM
75,564
- -
6,952
68,6t2
G.O. State Aid Bold 0Mi
3,214
- -
3,922
4,292
�.reamnt L3prov nt RevoMv
195,087
226
8,530
186,731
Spacial A -. 1966-1976
894,950
820
NJ
895,674
spacial Assess 1983
253,420
584
55
253,949
special 4sass 1932
122,743
15,248
41
138,955
. i'pnr ?s±catin9
39,278
37,252
45,376
29,654
aate4 Opa!,':inJ
(7,iR5)
414
tt,999
(18,720)
Sean[ OpetatiY7
214,717
6,322
26, 546
194,491
Golf Course Ope[ati,n
32,282
16,741
8,313
32,798
ap�leil Taw L 'nt Trent Fund 3,89�
j3,H73t742j_
427345
._.____
1, 475r330
1, 4147W0
j3t7 70t1101. 3,83_6,3fi6
T kw $3,897,656
$. 95,054
$ 11992,959
$ - -
$ 1,475,330
$= 243,792
$ - -
$ 105,5111 $3,83�6,36
y$1,414,040=
10'1BI5 [A9P YRW $3,636,727
$,['89
$ 227,369
4
$ 1, 115,007
S 33
S 1,101,786
S.
$ 50�606 $3,617,®30
��
.351
.., ..,
3279,J
.. „, ,,,
;,, ,, .,
CITY w G07Y3
ar4wny oe R IPIS, olsl0lBSl)905 AW B'Iwuss
m The Him eoenm f sE� A I984
RMIMiR]
&dim
Investment
Cash
Transfers
Investaents
Tramfers Inveafm®1ta
Cash
ImeabmM
BWD Bal.
Bal.
Feoeints
In
bold
Oisturseummsts
Out
ArrChased
Balk.
Balarce
General $
$ 1,993.8%
$1,237, M2
S 14,9%
6
$1,3Tl,940
$ 3,113
$
$ 1,775,139
$
Federal Se ems Sharing
67,%0
M.327
3,717
14,805
75.M5
Barks
109,087
19,113
15,887
103,213
�nity Developaeft Blmk Graft
(151)
11,354
15,416
(4,213)
0luipaent Outlay
113,369
5,421
6,226
16,256
949
107,817
Building Capital Outlay
30,490
1,276
- -
31,766
M icipal State Aid Canetruptim
62,088
14,461
7,937
68,612
G.O. State Aid Rind Bsod
4,968
44,004
43,772
4,292
Pernenent In rov t Revolving
1%,477
12,628
12,364
IM,733
Special Asaess 1966-1976
1,125,992
156,7%
378,467
7,746
895,678
Special Assess 1980
2%,462
96,219
7,746
149,478
M3,%9
Special Assess 1982
132,956
88,4%
61,507
130,955
Liquor Operating
27,690
374,993
372,129
29,654
Water Operating
5,502
65,939
90, 161
(18,720)
Se er Operating
157,500
325,093
284,907
3,113
194,493
Golf Course operating
18,%1
82,875
0,348
32,706
Pmled Investment Taut 6 rd 4,175,663
(4,175,663)
246,409
15,441,486
180,153
15,102,189
(3,776,116)
3,8%,366
�AIS $4,175,663
$ 67,876
$2,7%,851
$ 28,2%
S1.rY'.a86
$3,8%_513
$ 2892%
515-102u189-
b m85r:11
53r036,39
m.n.
10fAfS LPSI' YFAR $4,002,162
$ 45,875
$2,479,2M
$ 45,429
$14, 111,77]
$2, 859, 151
b 45,429
$13,727,885
$ 50,606
$3,617,510
e y Oe
�r�
14
COUNCIL MEETING
MEMORANDUM
NOV 26 1984 D
'V
NOV 2 0 1984 i ORON
TO: Mayor and Council MembersCITY OF 1
City of Orono �� CITY OF RONO
FROM: Thomas J. Radi6/^
DATE: November 19, 1984
Enclosed for your information is the recent decision
by Judge Maclaughlin, dismissing a lawsuit concerning the
denial of a building permit. The decision further defines and
narrows a municipality's liability in federal court for its
actions.
TJR/dd/0155F
Enclosure
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
FOURTH DIVISION
James W. Littlefield and
Bonnie J. Littlefield,
Plaintiffs,
V.
CIVIL 4-83-1003
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
City of Afton, a Minnesota
municipal corporation; George
Billmeyer, Nicholas
Mucciacciaro, Kenneth Kopitzke,
Edward Tichenor, and Richard
Frenzel, members of the Afton
City Council; and Helen H.
Baker,
Defendants.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
James W. Littlefield, Hart and Bruner, Suite 700,
1221 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN 55403,
for plaintiffs.
Frederick C. Brown, Bruce D. Malkerson, and Thomas J. Radio,
Popham, Haik, Schnobrich, Kaufman c Doty, 4344 IDS
Center, Minneapolis, MN 55402 for defendants.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
This matter is before the Court on defendants' motion
for summary judgment and plaintiffs' motion for partial
summary judgment.
■ACTS
Plaintiffs James Littlefield and Bonnie Littlefield,
purchased a 19.3 acre parcel of land in Afton, Minnesota on
August 26, 1983, In order to construct a residence, plain-
tiffs sought to obtain a building permit from the City of
Afton. In their quest for a building permit, plaintiffs had
to attend a aeries of meetings. The final meeting plaintiffs
attended was the October 18, 1983 Afton City Council meeting.
The Council concluded that it would grant plaintiffs a
building permit if plaintiffs complied with ^ertain condi-
tions. The most salient condition being that plaintiffs
convey a public right of way to a nearby parcel of land owned
by Zoning Administrator Helen Baker and her husband, and
Mr. and Mrs. Robert Fritz. At present, the City is willing
to grant plaintiffs z building permit if plaintiffs convey
the right of way to the Bakers end Fritzes. Bee Radio to
Littlefield letter of July 10, .1.
Plaintiffs commenced this ..c O.B.C. S 1983 action
shortly after the October 18, 1983 City Council meeting.
Plaintiffs are suing the City, all the members of the City
Council, and Zoning Administrator Baker. Plaintiffs allege
that the denial of their building permit application was
without due process of law and that the requirement of
conveying a public right of way constitutes a taking without
- 2 _.
a
just compensation. Plaintiffs allege that defendants'
actions were motivated by a desire to benefit defendant
Baker. Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment stating that
they are entitled to the building permit without having to
convey the public right of. way. Plaintiffs also request an
injunction ordering defendants to issue the building permit
without the required conveyance. Plaintiffs finally seek
$50,000 in compensatory damages, an unspecified amount of
punitive damages, attorneys' fees and costs.
DISCUSSION
Procedural Due Process
Plaintiffs' claim that the City has denied their
building permit application arbitrarily and without due
process constitutes a procedural due process claim asserted
through the vehicle of 12 U.S.C. 5 1983. To establish such a
claim under section 1983, plaintiffs must not only show that
the defendants acted under color of state law, plaintiffs
must also demonstrate that they have been deprived of a right
protected by the federal constitution or federal statutes.
E.g., Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 535 (1981). Here, the
relevant inquiry is whether plaintiffs had a property
interest protected by the fourteenth amendment to the United
States Constitution. The fourteenth amendment itself,
- 3 -
however, does not create protected property interests.
Parratt, 451 U.S. at 529 n.l. Rather, the Court must look to
independent sources, such as state law, rules, .er-
standings to ascertain whether a protected property intereet
exists. id.
Under Minnesota law, however, plaintiffs do not have a
property interest in a building permit. See Jaska Co. v.
City of St. Paul, 309 N.W.2d 40, 44 (Minn. 1981)i Ri eg s v•
City of St. Paul, 62 N.W.2d 363, 373-74 (Minn. 1953). Since
plaintiffs do not have a protected property interest in the
building permit, plaintiffs cannot challenge defendants'
denial of the permit as arbitrary and thus in violation of
procedural due process. See, e.g., Parratt, 451 U.S. at 535;
Vruno v..Schwarzwalder, 600 F.2d 124, 129 (8th Cir. 1979).
Sven if defendants' failing to grant the permit violated
state law, plaintiffs cannot challenge that denial under the
federal constitution since no protected property interest
exists. Vruno, 600 F.2d at 130-31. A denial of a building
permit which violates only state law raises a matter of local -
concern and is 'properly and fully reviewable in the state
courts." Chiplin Enterprises v. City of Lebanon, 712 F.2d
1524, 1527 (lot Cir. 1983).
- 4 -
I
Taking
In addition to their procedural due process claim,
plaintiffs also allege that defendants' requiring plaintiffs
to convey the public right of way to the Bakers and the
Pritres constitutes a taking of private property in violation
of the fifth amendment to the United States Constitution.
More specifically, plaintiffs assert this conveyance
requirement constitutes taking private property for other
than a public purpose and without just compensation.
Plaintiffs argue that the increased public needs which would
be created by construction of plaintiffs' residence, do not
warrant the City demanding the right of way.
The Supreme Court of Minnesota has declared that in
certain situations, a municipality's requiring a subdeveloper
to dedicate land to the public as a prerequisite for granting
a building permit can constitute a taking of private property
in violation of both the Minnesota and United States Consti-
tutions. Collis v. City of Bloomington, 246 N.W.2d 19, 21,
26 (Minn. 1976). Municipalities may only require sub -
developers to dedicate an amount of land which reasonably
relates to the increased public needs created by the sub-
division. To require more than an amount reasonably related
to the increased public demands engendered by the subdivision
- 5 -
would constitute a taking. Id. Many other state courts are
In accord with Collis on this point. See, e.g., Simpson v.
City of North Platte, 292 N.W.2d 297, 301 (Neb. 1980)i and
cases cited in Collis.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth
Circuit, however, recently held that a plaintiff can not
maintain a •taking• action under 42 U.S.C. S 1983 in federal
court without first attempting to utilize state remedies.
Collier v. City of Springdale, 733 F.2d 1311, 1314-15, 1317
(8th"Cir. 1984). Collier held that if a governmental entity
acquires property by means other than formal condemnation
procedures, a plaintiff's recourse is to bring an inverse
condemnation action in state court. Id. at 1314. Sere,
Plaintiffs in effect argue that defendants are improperly
extracting the right of way as a prerequisite to granting the
building permit. Clearly, plaintiffs have a state remedy in
that they can seek a writ of mandamus in a state trial court.
See, e.g., Spaeth v. City of Plymouth, 344 N.W.2d 815, 822
(Minn. 1984).
The Collier court also noted that
fa)lthough the state remedies may not provide
. all the relief which may have been
available . under g 1983, that does not
mean that the state remedies are not adequate
to satisfy the requirements of due process.
Collier, 733 F.2d at 1317, quotinq Parratt, 451 U.S. at 544.
- 6 -
Defendants appear to have treated plaintiffs poorly. In
a situation involving granting of a public access to property
owned in part by a city official, the City should have taken
extraordinary measures to avoid even the appearance of
impropriety. Nevertheless, plaintiffs will have to seek
their redress in state vourt.
Based on the foregoing, IT It ORDERED that plaintiffs'
motion for partial summary judgment is denied, and
defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
,u ge Harry H. NacLaugn n
United States District Court
DATED: November 1 �, 1984
7 -
COUNCIL MEETING
POPHAM, HAIK,SCHNOBRICN,
KAUFMAN
& Dam LTD. NOV 26 1984
•]ee 10, ......
M IN
NEArO LISP MINNESOTA S5402
CITY OF ORONO
V NL........
.... O wO N
I,Oe[w. C N014 N[N
1"0. 'l[w.. T...
w OOP W [GnMOwwiCn
w. pLRLN
e.[v[N O n [ND
n 1[vLN¢[N.n .A[[t
N v[w .• x
.N[e [. LOc.N•w.
.nOxY r. IeON
D[NV[R,COLOIIAOO a0i0[
•. oo.
uLN w
.noN•f
.[ A. ••
wo.[.T • Nn.
••owo N [N[
om� [n[e eo
walr[ .. Weso[N
n�[[N wT
6 wn�tL u[•D
O[V LL'L .P P[ON
C.
wwVG[ O W LIO
1...'..A...
Ned RI O. A[[N•N
A.
....LA. . ..
fV a W.
r w[O[w1U
INOXA. C.O AOVrt•
ewuG[ ........
.11003.
WAOXIMOTO N. D. C. 100]a
SWIN TON. D
a. muw
..c"
. D.
.[... .. �[.
`
a•w.. Ac
—..
..[wOry
n L +Ic..-Pwc
.wow.
[o L`.so-slew
ae[v f�w w+`
.�oxu
L
A. TwO.gON
cw e.ow.,
[ mum[
.NONu •. evo
Nic..0 T. N.uN
..co L. NowafoN
November 21, 1984
Thomas A. Judd, Esq.
Nodland, Conn, Judd i Nordaune
550 Sholard Tower
600 South Highway 18
St. Louis ?ark, HN 55426-1203
Re: Public Easement
Dear Mr. Judd:
Enclosed is my memorandum to the City Council.
TJR/dd/0182P
Enclosure
c. John Gerhardson
Ve y -tr y your
Thomas J.adio�
ECCI'TY
23M OF OR NO
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Citv Council Members / L
FROM: Thomas J. Radio, City Attorne.Y7
RE: Public Easement in Favor of the City of Orono
DATE: November 21, 1984
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In May 1984, Mr. and Mrs. Thomas J. Friede, 3215
Crystal Bay Road, Orono, Minnesota were in the process of
selling their home at that address. During that process, they
were advised by the attorney for the purchaser that the
property did not have access to a public street. The
purchasers' attorney stated that while the property is located
on Crystal Bay Road, this does not constitute access since
their research showed that Crystal Bay Road had never been
platted and exists simply by virtue of use. Property owners
along this stretch of Crystal Bay Road also gain access to the
rear of their property across a railroad right of way owned by
the Burlington Northern Inc. Only one particular homeowner
along Crystal Bay Road, Mr. Peter Cohen, has access to the rear
of his property by virtue of a lease with the Burlington
Northern Inc. None of the other property owners have any
formal arrangement with Burlington Northern Inc.
Mr. Judd, attorney for the Friedes, discussed this
situation with Burlington Northern Inc., requesting a private
easement for the benefit of Mr. and Mrs. Friede. Burlington
Northern advised him that they would not grant private
easements but would be willing to consider a public easement to
the City of Orono and to the City of Minnetonka Beach. Their
discussions concerned an easement benefiting either the
properties located at 3205 and 3215 Crystal Bay Road or for the
benefit of all property owners along Crystal Bay Road extending
700 feet to Mr. Cohen's property.
Mr. Judd then contacted John Gerhardson, and Mr.
Gerhardson advised Mr. Judd that it was the staff's opinion
that the City would be willing to attain the easement on the
condition that there be no expense to the general public, that
all expenses would be borne by the directly benefited property
owners, and that the City would not be responsible for the
maintenance of the easement. Based upon that understanding,
Mr. Judd wrote to Mr. Nelson requesting further discussions
regarding a public easement in favor of the City of Minnetonka
Beach and the City of Orono.
Based upon this understanding, Mr. and Mrs. Frieda
were able to sell their home. The sellers, however, ascrowed
$2,625 to cover the costs of the acquisition of the easement.
In October 1984, John Gerhardson received a letter
from Burlington Northern transmitting copies of the proposed
easement and requesting payment in the amount of $2,625.
LEGAL ISSUES
1. Whether the City is obligated to provide access
through the acquisition of the easement.
2. Whether the costs of the easement should be borne
by the City through special assessment or borne ty the property
owner.
ANALYSIS
The Friedes contend that the City should acquire the
easement and assess the costs to all benefited homeowners for
the following reasons:
1. The City should provide some type of access since
Crystal Bay Road is unplatted; and
2. That the City would be obtaining access to two
fire hydrants which are located in the railroad right of way.
The Friedes contend that the public easement benefits
all of the abutting landowners and hence the costs should be
spread out among them. In the event that the City chooses not
to assess the other landowners, the Friedes have indicated that
they would like to see an easement obtained only to their
property for which they would be willing to pay.
The issue of whether Crystal Bay Road is platted or
unplatted would seem to be somewhat irrelevant. Under
Minnesota Statute Section 160.05, when any road has been used
and kept in repair for at least six years continuously, it is
deemed dedicated to the public use. Crystal Bay Road has been
maintained for at least 16 years. Hence, access would not seem
to be a necessary reason for obtaining the easement.
-2-
At the same time, the Council may well find it
appropriate and necessary to serve the public health, safety,
and welfare to obtain this easement, particularly in light of
the placement of certain fire hydrants. This would be a matter
for the Council's discretion.
As the Council is aware from prior special
assessments, the state statute provides that special
assessments made for a public improvement of any character may
be levied on the owner of abutting property or benefited
property for that benefit which is different from the general
benefit which the owners enjoy in common with the other
inhabitants or citizens of the municipality. The benefits
conferred are at least full compensation for the expense
imposed upon the person assessed, thereby resulting in no
pecuniary lose. The whole theory of special assessments is
that the improvements for which they are levied afford
remuneration in the way of benefits. The test, when
determining the validity of a particular assessment, is whether
the assessment exceeds the special benefit to the property.
Here, the assessment would be approximately $315 per lot. The
Friedes have indicated that all of the abutting landowners
would be interested in seeing the City obtain a public easement
and that all but one of those would be willing to participate
in the expense, as long as the expense is reasonable and would
not exceed $100 to $200 per property owner. Administrative and
legal expenses would also have to be added to this cost
estimate.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Council should consider the following issues:
and 1. Whether the public easement should be obtained;
2. Whether the cost of the easement should be borne
by the Friedes or assessed to all benefited property owners.
Mr. Judd will be appearing at the Council Meeting on
behalf of the Friedes to discuss the matter and answer any
questions you may have.
TJR/dd/0181F
-3-
COUNCIL MEETING
NOV' G I�td
LIST OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL
FOR MEETING OF November ze, 198 ITY OF ORONO
None
COUNCIL MEETIN�g
NOV 2f 1984
TO: City Council
FROM: Joan Lattin, Assistant Finance Director CITY OF O RONO
DATE: November 23, 1984
SUBJECT: Prelist
Our computor service bureau LOGIS is taking a four day holiday over
Thanksgiving, therefore the Prelist of Bills will be presented to you
on Monday evening.
CITY CF C°O90
C 1 Xll/iBld� r-r_ .. _
7T9 GRCSS ""'ItMKML MEETING
BL 31 24948.74 1141.42
MR 12 4u419.23 1687. 44
3A 31 14C94.P5 757.32 NOV 2G 1984
CA 9^ 626.^C IOR.:O
WD 31 27522a9O 1;43�0TY OF ORONO
VJ 02 2438!.29 4^36.44
;B 31 26624.G3 1392,72
OL V'S 11516932 493.%1
DJ 93 2346.75
NR 31 25601.54 1196.P6
JM 31 25643, 86 117T.14
RP 33 21493.60 066.:0
JR 1@2 31415.37 1314.`9
R0 90 56C.00 104.'G
JO 42 7"•9.55 922.24
vE 31, .12 1155.50
JR .'•F 962./5
SC 42 _P674 02o.:0
CJ 31 4740.52 ?76."1)
JP V1 215G.32 55. 25
CA 9w 13439.14 563.4S
TJ 33 22232.90 921.56
RJ v^ 2559.97
BP 31 24498.72 1:17,5•.3
MM 31 35'49.23 1414.24
M 31 25632.32 1111.-C
CA 15 15158.79 665.60
OL 93 G._O O.'C
TR 15 29567.93 1235.28
JC 15 1?404.68 033.47
JA 33 27.44956 1174.?9
CM 90 3632.67 206.93
LR 97 24216.57 1 111 .13
J 31 26177.76 1170.24
FT 61 17?15.70 712.56
TL 12 3J24.^0 560. V
OD 93 330.:2 '01C
?L 42 1654.^O 0.39
L: 33 0415690 400.'^
0B 31 ?85.76 )$no
SC 31 24995.78 1; 36. 68
RY 93 6C3.76 3.31
JE 31 25929.]2 ti17,4O
RJ 12 2?7C.12 59.53
4A 92 21597.59 972.+6
GE 93 263.20 i.CO
JJ 42 19940.95 459.05
CL 93 1921.90 3.,70
CP 93 73.70 O.iJ
DS 42 1989C.34 131.79
CITT OF OR07u v e
EKPL-NO NAME DI9 GROSS GROSS EYP/ALI
SLIGO SR 93 1633935 C.ID
SMITH JR 92 21672.9I 995.54
S TEF FE:IH AG RE 93 2217196^. 9269: `}
STEVENS BG 93 16949i0 393D
SuTTON 'E 12 1034292! 439.75
TOKZYK MY 31 25:04.34 1 ? I Iaol
Cl U01T GCA64D 339935.71
PAIC il:345
TOTAL 0:057 T(TAL
TOTAL FICA TAY 3AO3S = 199967934 'MOLOYERS F
A = GPCUP HTALTA
G = PFYSICIANIS HEALTH PLAN
C = PLLE :V)SS/3LU-" SH!SLO
0 = r=DIC:L C-NTE4 PLA%
E = PRUDENTIAL
F = CCO9D9 HEALTH CARE
G = PINNESOTA HMO
H = TRANS—AAERICA OCC9
I = GASKEPS LIFC
U = MUTUAL SERV7C[L
K = MUTUAL 3F i4AHA
L = EMFLCYCEIS SEVFIT
F = AETNA
N = NIC^LLET EITEL
.0 = LEAGUC OF CITIES
Z = HEALTF CARE MA 14il ACCT9
MISSING MCSP CODE FM SOME EMPL'S
d.Y
f .
f
3
lwa eyrr OF wor
-
i
CIICCR Restafte
tt-i�-sa
►eac 1
e ► +e.
Dare
6eou+r
AP._
�
_
Stu otsayntw
pecan r tw ■ ► e. s
Icssu[
a'
2313r7
E313)2
11121/e4
Ille"ed
3206
4S.2a
JOMis SU`• SUPKt.`..
FueLY/Loses
olaiiO-fiAs1 '_
1
_
llt A2
_
11/tl/!t -
- -- ae.+0 -
-'- JOIIRs AV SUPPLY
FU!Uftwes -
01-s220.24%e:
•
D1371
11/21/84
11,47
.IOMIs IUl SUPPLY----
-
EMIPIPS/tCCES
- Ct-6232-2t9:e2
-�------
"—
t). e9
JOMB aUU SUPPLY
FUELS/WOIS
)2-a12f►Sa9-91
i
_11121/N
JONRS SI1i_O 31Pt•�__
Fy[LS/SWCS
r3i220-SN.92
(
71Y. 19
/1/H/sa
31.67
A-MCAM LIRM
PAT SLOG/SRO;
.__ _
21-a343-91"0
__ •.-Cas
3t.sr .
S
3)1J7.
11/H/!l
e0,•0
440e+30e-SAUCE
C2xvSCx0aL5
ry-43)6-1296)1 -
•••-CRS
-
(
e^.`0 •
•
SS1.39
11 Rl/Ya
1.1sr.e6
Ca YL F at]t RSOr ASSC
ST "I SUPP
CI-ai3L 2N-a2
E
1.I)I.st •
39:•1
II/21 n.
2064.-a
ar• IYS OM YtWatt3UY
SaEC EL• s: CJYpi
9.4S30-]N-11
• ••-CRS
(
ou, •
a
lSt.ai
11/atria
R, 1
ai P]t "C.
•••-CRS
•YT 1PF ELI
EI-4340-039.12
sSL Sa
11I)1/ea
'..!
•• •CMS
'
♦.a66.11
►P-OY 591) S 51
!T -it 3U:
G1-ai y)-Eav-a2
.
331.l;
1112111E
•, —
•••-CMS
)C�l[
BL aCt Lt1Y { c0Y3
4091,13S Pn•
)1-4313-f1i-9]
'
531.±1
11/21/ea
S1.•]
9•SJY OxCt]
... Ca.
y.. •� .
OFF I']PPL ICi
]1-1. 10-C39-1a
'
Slt.w
11I21/I4
192.6S
SUTC9ES e16 SUPPLY
"it P
t YRCx
•• R5
•
192, eS •
/1-tSSO• 515-9]
u u.•
1
�
S S1.9)
1I1ZI/91
at.'2
CADI- ::T• 3:31
•••-CMS
u,•t
J:rt Pya CN
11•4e1E-513-9p
S31. a•
I1 Rl/!a
•eLf]
:•Pa:LL Star
ar. Lt s.3 All slP
)z-az,a_saan
t
11164 CITT
AN UM
CRACK RCGIOTSR
51-26-a/ PASS 2
artcN.
,._arc _—
uFauur•
__Arcs
aaM,zr_neO_
.croon No. rNr.
P F.a.. Nfssuc _ .
•�
• •'
661.60
— - ---
•
1
331124
I//21164
COC4 COLA r5N0t\a
Nil PIOCN
71-48211-51Lvo
-..
lop.eo
••.
_
_ __
_ .-CRS
- -
C
511/30
I1/21/04
37.72
COLOSIAL LIFE INS CO
HatTP INS
C1-4151-126-31
.31137
It/2t/94
15.79
COLO IAL L:FC I" CO
W<N 3Nl
"_4111-12h51
45-3.
At
131131
It/211%
39r.10
COFR3.:IA1 goo NNT
JLN:TJPt■L SE-
I0.4340.390.17
331131
linl/•l
221.-1
COW-01A< AUG NNT
JANITORIAL 37•
H-4340.129.31
\
611.33
..•...
.• .CRS
531,12
11/21/V
13^..P
0±e1 7Y. =4 !IC
]Ff 3JMLISI
C1.4210.120.31
.•....
owCN4
\
1311.3
1-1111-4
9U.1s
DIt ):STPIBYr:•4 :2
■CS. F'URG9
II-<S/S-Sty-90
`
$51163
Il/2La4
S6.':3•
Oil S:STa:90:10 CI
.)I i:T
71-lath-51Y9C
331163
I1 nlA4
S.F1
UT )±STA!aOT:NG C3
1:1 a'JPCV
71-4420-S/5-90
•
164.52 .
n11i1
11121/4
t.554.15
l::]E 3Cr'•.-•.
3CCV 1P:Y
)1.4nf-Si5-90
rnn
.. nt/■a
•4.F:-
+A:r . ur sat 3c v-)c
33T :rr
n-a 2ls-sts.vG
+.u•ns
`
......
.......
atr3t
n/21/14
A..,-
:: rP cu:
_"u:':cs
74.43ia-s90-93
a
;1/0114
95.10
il:TZLCR J FAIR
A -IF:'. A-.
:1-4221-129-31
75.10
$I1253
•tl)vy
11..9
G:WT4 VA.LC1 CC
CGNF/SCFCOLS
0.43•6-129-)1
•
13TISa
If 1211 FA
1r9.4!
:[W C -'.IT; CO
:JYI•19TS1ACC_Ss
CI-4232-149-41
331256
11/21/!4
5.15
4-WI%Z ,ITS Co
:GY:2I.TS/4cuss
)2-4232-549.91
331256
11/21/t<
6.6)
1e'01:'17 .citi M
SOJ:P PATS/■: LESS
n-4232-569-92
1:
•
1904 BETS OF YRONO
BECK REGISTER
11-2MN P.6[ 3
CM[CR
RO.4 14
6RR91R
YE ROW _
S N BESCRIPTIGN
LCCGWE RB. I"-
I P•0• B RESSME
331zM
lim/M
123.6,5
GLEN40001NGLEGOGB_ -
UTILITIES
331264
11/21/86
661aSS
GRIGGS BEER GIST
BEER •UACH
21-4815-SIS-99
66••SS
...-css
531244
1IM104
4.59
NIPPIS POTATO CRI.
CONC ?ESALE
/4.,3:2-590-93
331254
11/91094
4.19.
.,..TS .OTAf] CHIP
One 2ESALE
14-4620.590-91
•312P4
I1/21/14
4.59
-4-AT5 POTATO CHIP
C"C RESALE
26-4a20-S90-93
4.59 .
••.-CRS
.....•
3•1216
11,21114
12.'^
.SARIS OFF;CE EGUTA
KA:Nt RTC JH C-L..
31-1312-169.15
3313-e
11I21Is
24.0
HEW^T iNE+]FF 3'T
EOUr• PTS A-CCSS
11-IM. 129-31
3511..
111?119.
'R AS
HENS CTT !.EIIIF '+T
J.[L :.SES
31-4 M-J40-16
131.1?
1.1-CKS
331359
1VI1/!.
2..40.11
[rTet4Ai; `•IAL SW
ST HNT SOJPL:C.
^1-4233-249.4?
.'
2.14101 .
.. u.•
•••-CRS
3113!>
11I I11e1
".12
KEryI•IT? J-UG
EOU:P PTS KC.SS
11-4232-129-31
4
..._CKS
3' ..•
1fl?"Al
A/3..5
LIM iEL1T3C4S ASS%
APS:rWrCN
31-IIC6-129.31
1
1T.•3
....iAS
......
Ss11,1
11,7111.1
10.53
THE .ARE,
1TRER C04SOLT
91-4322-320-11
10.30
35145D
11/21/84
14.12
L^433
L16!LS-J HA9.E—M
^1-3190-000-00
331435
1192113A
?Y.^?
L04IS
MIT AGREE•C:SECT62S
91-4340-069-15
MISS
11/2t/14
253.27
LOUIS
ACM'. SE.9ICE•OCT
:1-4352-069-/5
-
Y tt..,
1�9'., /. SA'
".
�t'AV'J-1'L
.:� +.p""ri-
';4'?� `
!w '�('_"'•.
0\t''•.
i
19114 CITY O9 ORORO -
- CHECK RESISTER
1146-44 Past 4
r
arte.
no. art
r2Ro91
_Irz� otseAnnat
wean M. its.
2 r.a • leasAIt _
)hiss
T_.•alrt
11/21,84
I.ea
LOQS
AOK:r SERVICE.00T
01-4352.069-15
•
• 3JI43S
11/21/14
4.16
LOBES
CCURIER O OCT
C1.4153-069-IS ----
-"" ---'- """
351435
-- 11/21/24 -
$%.So '- ---
0613 - --- -
04TA FROG-OCT �--
01-41SS-069-11
331411
31/21,94
99.0o
LOOTS
MY IGAEZ-OIRECTSZS
n"340-549-91
A.
Sn 43S
11/SIIJ4
$0.34
LOGIS
AMIN SERVICE-OCT
72-4352.140.91
_ . _--
35143S
11/21,64
120.961"-
LOat- -
DATA PROC-CCT -
n-/311.149-91 ..
--
33143,
11/21/84
121.10
LOQs
RKT AGREE-0!AECTa25
}7-4340.569.92
•
331435
11/21/84
?1.79
L9613
AOr IY SERVICE-OCT
7A4352-569-92
_
13143s
11/21/24
203.39
LIST$
DATA PNAC-CCT
T1-4355-%9092
2.116.12
•
......
..•-CKs
•
33143}
11/11/34
R.66
CI TT Or LIIQ LANE
of.{l2M 129-S1
lan
tvnlPa
ses.ea
ern a2 Lora LA RE
OFFA-'UTILITIES
9rP HEFT
E1-4s3z-uan
m.It .
•
.0
• o-C FS
•
ifla4lu•
11 RtIN
LCrO LIRE tfiE SS2V
R19 -Is: E9U:^
^.l•4342-249•42
32.50
......
•...CKS
13141:
11/21/14
I.SS4.15
K1-K VIE L'L'3
P:EI -URCR
it-41/L515-90
•
3*!\O
11121/2.
49.13.
.IA¢ V:: iM .
aW i.T
?1_4416-SIS-93
1.SJ}.15
•
•....•
•• •CRS
33, 4.1
11/2111I
11C.9r
.IRTIYS YITAARE 65
.RT IVTO 22V)9
-1•434f-129-31
•Iw•a} .
......
.... CRY
1'14r)
11/2,11,
11.321.96
-EIRR was" C19ROL
J'_C YACC
i!-121z-aOO-O2
......
.... Cot
311 \I'
11,211.1
7/605
-:]VEST -:-MALT
! vNT SP
C1.42S1-2N•tz
21
331111
11121le,
21.7c
Ra LS EAT9:r C•
W .;SC Ea37P
C1.41B-249-42
21. -
3115.
11/211•4
2T-05
4L11r w0.v
T:LL"JKE
C14 f6)-R0.fl
3111 ;
1111114,
Y5.50
••Yr C9K.
T-LEI^ORE
^1-4320-1i4-33
751. 'S
....••
.... CKS
1911 CITY
OF OAOM
CKCR R[fISgO
/1-26-56 PU[ S
_
CHECK NO.
GATE
MOUNT
YCN009
IIEN DESCRIPTION
1CCOYIIT M. IN9•
6 P.O. 6 11[sS NL_
f
3311;9
11/H/14
43.32
ON OLPT Ili SAFETY
OFF SIf►LIES
01N2/0-Imil
L
•.
E
331554
11/21/66
110.30
NOTOLOL• I1C
MT AUTO
01.6361-200.61
6
110.70 .
A
......
331S1S
11/21/64
16.30
■-WAE 1a10 REPA39
"I AUTO
01.6361-1/h33
A.
SWO
f
<
SS1f3SST1I SSSaA4e2I
19.
42w29L HAAOiKr
ELO/6)S MT
{-1231-000•11
• .
3314
11/21/14
t.-0
NAVHAAOYAAC
EQUIP ITS ACCESS
Obt2)2-120-71
A-
$t-
11121PI4
2.25
NIA-T 91ifYNC
E2YIP PT3 KC:
Ef-t232-116-33
t/21114
I+1
/2112,
61.'4-53
.WE, Ts 4.33
PTS
91-4M.2a9-a2
S1/zif.l
29.I2
NAVIAIC Y_iOYAAr
COUIP ACC:53
22-4I2-i1A91
33151,
It/21/i4
3A.6Y
NAYAA9E Ne1OVA9E
EOYIP FTS ACC -SC
73-h232-569 92
•
Silsa•
I1f z+Il.
9.S3
aAYAiiE •=RG"At
COU-P -IS lcc:ss
74-/232-SVC.93
221.50 .
•
.. -CRS
-
U+139
11121114
625.59
YSA
St L:TCS
Cl-4321-24F 12
W 55V
Itfillet
2i9.A1
See
bM!_. ES
71.1321-515-U
ISS9
it f2tl)1
P66..6
YsP
UTILSTIES
R-1324-S49.91
-
SAI S SI
11/2t114
0.:7
Lia
UTILIIIES
21-4324•slAgr
•
-
......
....CRS
3I W
11/2II31
1..12
N^iN1ESC401 FrLL
T%Z-459E
3t-1320-ri9•/2
-
3)t 17c
11/21/14
4A.?6
%OATN.EST^iA ?ELL
TELEPHONE
T1-1320.515-90
SITS/r
11/23/14
9,0
11•790CSI_iN AHL
%NEATI3114
11-4323-111-SC
sm5"
11/21,14
21.12
N1AT..EiTE4h 5%L
rC4'P ry9L
/2-13Y3.549.91
"15/^
11/21/11
24.10
h.aHaES1_AA dCLL
'r1CP-ONE
73-1320-$69.92
3..151:
Il/21I31
7.S1
h^INVEST¢ h I-LL
1ELEPHSNE
71-I320-569-92
123.47
«.•r•
....CRi
$31574
11/21/31
).S9E.:0
OFFICT e•10 0; 11
CFF [9UIP
',.,i10-299•Sz
Y.790.10 •
-
......
....CMS
F
351s!2
11/21,94
I1. SS
MN/ULE
1IL 2A SE
11-1111-121-33
13.11
w
1115i1
21121ISl
71206
ICAA
-ERA 1C/22 rc 1114
71-a I I -I Sv-1z
•
11114 CITY OF MM
CNLCR REGISTER
11-26-44 RHL 6
•
CY.ECR
046 care AROINt
VEMOO1 _
IiLll OLSCRtHIN1
ACCOYRT e1 INS.
6 9.0. 6 N[S346C
_
,•`•
331"?
11/21/!4
33.es
PERA
-ERA 10122 TO
1114
01-4I41-040-13.
Sot"1
11/21/14
2.33
PEAR
-Eta 10/22 TO
1114
01-410-059-14
33149/
- - 11/21/64 - -
Q.16 - -
-ERA -
PERA Wit T3
11/4 - --
•
S31S9I
I1/21/84
2T.09
FERA
PERA Wit TC
1114
01-4/41-099-1?
131 so?
11/21/µ
1.C34.74
seM
PERA 10/21 TO
If/4
91-4141-111-31
SSIS9F
I1/2/164 ----
?9..?- "-
PERA
PERA 13122 TO
11/4- -
P.1-4141-t1S-31 --�-
- ------ --
-
-
$31 I9?
I1/21/?4
253.24
Prm
PE4A 10122 TO
11/4
51-4141-12I-31
53IS97
11/21/54
1e0.-?
-IRA
PER{ 19122 11
1114
11-4141-126-31
33159?
Itiails,
1?6.25
aril
0E44 13/22 TO
1214
^.1-4141-17M33
-
$3159?
11 fat 144
M.71
vvA
PERA 10122 To
1lf4
CI-4141-249142
33IS92
11/21/64
13,02
PEAR
-ERA 10122 r
1114
01-4141-290-61
331$9/
11/21111
.&a
PEAA
PERA 10/22 T3
1114
41-4141-405.00
53159?
31/21/94
151.42
PERA
PER& 10122 TO
1114
11-6143-115-va
33t 51?
11/211C4
76.60
-.-A
-ERA 10122 TC
1114
72-414f.'PA9-91
331S91
1102119,
134.1t
PrIA
-ERA 10122 TJ
1114
r3.4141-S69.92
331 S9?
11/21/st
43.-1
PEII
-E41 40/22 71
IM
74-6141-5941.93
?.991••1
'
..«..
or•ERS
131..1
111i1/11
2•a2!.•T
Pi Pri CL'i"San
ST PMT SUP
31-4233-249-42
'
2.121.-1
•,
......
•-•-CAS
ffl SfY
I1/21 nt
151.SJ
.E15: CJL)/TUP 9•0
•} anRM
71-6123.115.93
'S1.SC
_
.....•
......3
3.111/
11121/64
I..'s
.""I FLC-)AY
CFF SJPPL:E-a
It-6e10-129-31
1..-s
••••••
•• .CRS
531.2.
11/11/86
1.1:
1.4E•1 0'3T
;TV., SU--UE'
PI-4230-515-9C
131611
11/211-4
1014.13
-)Aeat i:tr
T_E. 10C.1
71-1115.51S_9C
331.14
lWilp4
141,-2.
'Asps o:tf
Y.T 4 r
n-1, 6 sI s v0
1.141.10 .
..•..•
.••-CRS
3St 6U
1112,16.
STS.'3
aacMlr .2:4 4 1543C
RET119EA LES
G1-1131-JW-16
Ssl -LL
t1/flFA4
2.541.5s
-)"II 1t'4 4 ASSOC
C2UT LPP
91-if'2-ISC-16
1311?•
11/2t/!4
?T2.'0
%PRIR 42:5 A :SlaC
CC4SJIT :YTR
91.43.3-L20-11
$51."
IIinis,
1.1lt.4^
- Vw . -3:R 4 R43 OC
3T.[- CC 9:U LT
11-13'1-:43-1e
33162.
tl?tve6
I.
a2-MA- Mrt a =55 J-
c-M-a C14 SULr
•-43.3-J4C-16
S5162-
11/21/14
16.10
-C-MAM 4.:4 1 Assoc
CSMER CO I3VL1
B-aSU-129-31
331621
Il/21/p{
192.:p
eyN6M xt ;. A aSS aC
aTMER ICAW LT
Cl-4 SC 3-249-1:
31162d
ll/21161
46•.41
10,44R Mf'R 4 ASSOC
1141 4 CJn SUU
n-4113-e I O-?1
3116?E
II/t1/P4
4..S3
F441AP M2•6 R ASSOC
OTHER C5.1SUt1
?2-43'3-549-91
s.w.•G
......
...-CAs
$3169E
11/a/tl
Is
A C Z%CEAE:P3C:T:O9S
IFF SUPPLIES
]1-1?rC-R 0.11
1164 CITT OF ONWO
"ECK REGISTER
11.26-54 PAGE )
1
SCR
,MO•�ATf_
AMOUNT
v=MOOR
_. ��F11 0CSCRjITEO•
60001M5 0•�N.
/ -4 MESSAGE
__
("
_
2PS •
•
ib Al
_. _._ _._._
.. __ __
..
_
_ __..
__ ••u CRS
`.
R.J7
NEEO_UIMT t TOBACCO
COME RESALE
T4-41132-SIO-93
•••-CRS
6
33161)
11121,84
6SJ5
REK Otst :0
SEER PUNCH
)1-4515-SIS-/0
•
/F.1s
SAID Ia
tt/21151
21.•2
ROLLINS TL -1
ry_
-It ILUSES
01-4220.120•31
1/16h
11/21/24
154.14
R)LL1HS :C
FUELS/LUSTS
Ft-4220-24/-42
311.1.
11/21/N
4.15
3CIL%
ALE VS CC
FUELSILusa
)2-R20-S41-S1
•
Stl ala
11121184
S.--P
C:L
AXLE45 CL :5
FVELS/LUSES
)1d 220-56/-S2
tvs.vc
•
. ••...
•••_CR5
3316.2
11121".
R,i]
R J 4 S&L?;
•ISC 403E
)1-4920-513.96
•
A!.JI
•••.CKS
11 l2-
11/211m,
125.-a
5TATE 7R±:S 1:3 CT-
ACaR:<G AaP
21N221-12/. 31
33112•
11/21•Rt.
2T.03
SLATE TPT-. 3:; C•R
E•1:p/pr3RA:CvSS
:1.4232-121-3t
•
!46.•]
•••-ENS
ASIT"
1112"..
3).-S
STr"4T Sn,OJ:CN I>C
C:VC RESALE
21-48C2-5/0-93
32.'s
•
�••�••
-
•••-CKS
!
$31 H2
110211•1
104.44
SWUM% rtar :Ar
TOIIPIPT2/aCCE55
CI-4232-I2/-31
3!1152
I1/211d4
161.14
SiMisH FIRE :RC
E(H1-P/pTsfxCES3
11-4232-241-42
65a.5S
••••••
.......
•!II)a
11121••1
S.M ✓J
T5t•PE ]EST :1
RECR PU-c.
71.4915-515-90
a
31111e
I•/)V a4
1•.'S•
"lap: 0I;1 C.
a" R0
21.1S16.515-SC
N
•••...
•.«CKS
$511.6
11,21,94
1CS.90
UV:F)IIS ARLMTE3
NCAR:-'G APR
31-4221-129-31
•
101.31
f
53113$
11I21I.4
A.v]
GAA IS L:IES IMC
EOUP RENTAL
01-4331-241.42
_
•
-
.. -- .: PCr t-.
.. ..
•„p'4•:
dEa3?. •..�.P.F
'.1.•1Pl'•4�"
•
1"4 CIT"09
iR:+c
CNECN RESISTER
11-2A-ba PAGE 1
•
C.Tc+ vC.
L.TC
I-CU41
VEVol.
!TEN DESCRIMOC
ACC)UNT NO. :I:9.
. P.O. . MESSAGE
•
)•..e .
....cls
1316[1
11/21/e6
430.5?
NA TEA-RO)UCTS CO
+.-TEA) RNBI
t1-teas-a00-C:
[3!.ST
-..-CA5
-
3119•1
111111e4
92.:9
^LIRE ENS:T41-
ELCT:ON JUOG:
31-4310-040.13
92.'1
.... C.5
......
M 9.3
11/!112.
T1.:O
6CT IT JGNELIS
ELECT:ON JWGE
C1-4310-060-13
_
11;211![
9^.`o
C-CIL:1 S/NOEY:
ELECT:ON JU39.-
!1-1370-040-13
_
0±. •r
"IN 5
111211!A
1l. )
C)R:r IWWc
ELECT:ON JUOC
EA4310-040-13
_
97. .
3+11 A
Il/zt12.
2a.')
I+RETTE LINri)SD
ELECT ON JOOGE
r1J310.010-13
-
-
i..O
1119.1
11,241•4
e2_2
Eafb:^IA :PE+:•i
ELECT:OM JUCO-
^1-4310-040-I1
_
s 11 �.
111z1•S[
T..'
90'111:E HASTE.
ELEr:OR JUOGL
cl-6310-010-13
_
C.s
33191•
11/21/96
74.:3
BAARLAI E!I C334
ELICTEOM JU)S-:
01-4310-040-13
it.'S •
-
131711
11121/N
72.'0
EILEEN +T:.ICLLS
ELCTION J%K)GE
01-4 310-040-13
351.12
V iall-,
2i:-0
W. G+RTEI
ELCT:ON JUOOE
01-4310-04D-13
151913
111IM4
72.30
0 RAOINEN3)RISR
ELECTION JUDGE
31-1310-040.13
2i.:o .
3!1914
111211!,
1124.)
MARVEL RI:C
ELECTION NOGG
01.6310-340.13
311915
11/21M
72.30
MIRIAN Jc+N6DN
_ELECTION JUDGE._ __
O1N310-0/0-13
_
T2.)0
-I
531916
11on114
61.00
"ART CARLTON
ELECTION RIDGE
01"310-040./3
03.00
_ W1M MOIVM�_ _____[LCTIOM
JOOOE
01-6310-010./3
_ __
. .e.�...
S : . s._�gyi-'k.:�`s•'x:5las.'.: rr..__
_
_
19E4 CITY
Or ORONO
CHEM REGISTEN
11-26-44 PAGE
0
CMECR 00.
06T[
SaIOUMT
NEN0-.
TEN O[SCNf/TI611
_<CCOOIR Ill, [NE.
a F.D. S IKSSM�_
__
G
$3.13 •
i
531915
1f121IS4
- V.-0
most N<OOES
ELECt:ON x1ckGs
Ct-6310-040-13 -
- ---- ---
•
9^.'.O
k
331919
?1/21/84
9`..^.
a<RaLR3 OLSON - -
CL:CCON J006E-
01-4310-340-13- -
- -- - - - -
9T.,O
k
53192C
11/211 PI
C.10
RE 161ETo TUSNN<N
ELTCTEON JUDGE
Ct-4310-040-13
•
9?.11
k
S519a•
1a121/64
Ra.'l
C99Il TINE PE<SLE1
ELECTION JUDGE
C1-4310-040-13
.••...
..•.005
551V23
tf/21/S<
r`
L:LL[:Y SNlOS
ELECT. :CH WISE
01-43I0-047.15
<
�•''
•
i7192a
1112112a
T4.:3
JPHT it-YSCI
ELECTION AM-i
Ol-
<
e
J 31 cif
I1/tlr.a
101.25
[^.RN:r Caaa VE PE b'
-.LE CT :OR JU?&:
01- 1
<
J 31 ii!
If /21 a!a
94.53
S3 W]a:E GaGCY
EL.CT::4 WR IE
CI-4313.340.13
R.1?
e
ip 477
Il/21/?<
92.75
a]U a\Y PIaELL
ELEC!'JN JU3•c
:1.4 310-30-11
92.?S
i 11 iiw
11/ita as
i9,']
P. i:vER•i`;<
ELECT'39 JV]O'
'1.4310-340.13
.....•
....INS
iAl95l
11121 14
3.?iS.'?
P1L SR[E a no
PRY !LOTS/GP)S
:1-4313-799.17
3•PS.t? .
.
...•••
....CAS
11190
I1101/2i
11.662.:7
9?9 1RLSTUR CJNST
3L30 :RUCTUOES
T3-4120-SG0.12
11.661.:C
.....,
.• -CAS
S51•`]
Ill It,
saS•23
L?R19 Y]P•lEY
CTNva CCYEUL*
71 •t S]b Vh33
2S6.i2
•...CNS
341957
11/?v ?a
.1.17
midi:: VISIT MY',
--T6/a061
]1-4322.125-35
•1.59
.•.. •.
...-CAS
1954 CITY
OF ORONG
CHECK RESISTER
1146-94 PAGE . 1O
CHECK NO.
OSTE__ ___
__ APWW,__ __ _
._ Y'ia19• .. _
IMR DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INT•_
a P.O._ P -MESSAGE_
•
371962
11/21AA
2.675.^.0
APPRAISAL ASSOC
DTMER CONSULT
41-4306. 473-DO__
O
7119e3
It /21/34
211•57
94kOS OFF P000
]FF f'Jn MI iUxE
91-{3{0-129-51
_
21•. SO •
-
__
_
37/904
11121184
x0c
PtCIM EL E GRLSM
tins tnP
C1.N 20-1I9-31
S.)1
51199)
M21/!,
SP.9S
DECKER IUPPLY
EWIa PIS ACCESS
)2-4232-519.91
311965
I1/21rP4
T2.5S
OFCKER SUPPLY
EMIR PTS ACCSS
)5-4232-549-92
11196e
11/21r14
4S).•a
J L SALT
4tl:TAA•09
01-4706-129-31
•
451.60
SS1961
1,1211.4
a„]
S.y3-4 LPS01
ELECT:04 JUDSS
'.1-U10-740-17
1319P'
111211i.
]2.::
OaL•IJ: G.4R:N
lLICT`(14 JU00i
:1 .4 f17.:40-15
S71Y99
11/2119A
•3.13
C AMl CLA=R
L T:-0x JUTS
C1.4310•C40-1!
la 9/[
fl/211l4
yl .']
9:RI]7 G..Y
'L'_CT:ON JUei?
CI-4310-340.13
:Sill•
11r211•.
13.13
EL Oi QT•yJ
JF4-UPPLIE'a
:1-4210-]{0•IS
s
0.13
SKI^/)
1112711.
41.-D
•-Eli:
C)VPrSCN]OLS
C1-43S6-120.31
•
45.-0
151913
111211..
99.45
41NT ;NP 5E4a:CE
dOOK5lPEkIWCLS
11-4210.039-12
-
o9..s •
111914
fill Vl4
17-. `C
9:vxEP )1 :11 TRESS
L-.c1!E A T.RCS
)4.{313.59C.93
331M
11/111•4
?1.:)
C:TS JF M-2114
MIT L:K31L!
T3_4344-369.92
••••••
...C"
PC/1.5
11,21,34
1-1.13
41n4L9k PI)S
J147 PURCN
)1-4012-515-93
MMUAL
K11•a
1tr21/94
1P•y-
J3NN501 9.OS
N:1E DISC
71-4IS-SIS-9C
*WUAL
•
KH51
11r+114.
18.n)
J19453% R993
WINE DISC
)1-4113-$IS•90
RANUAL
Klt•>
1f 12•1x4
IS.•1•
J]•1314 Bali
CMS D51C
)1-4813-5I5-GO
MANUAL
9S2.f3
•
•01.0
11/211e4
I.715.25
- ,:L LE-S
•:NE DSCN
)1-491-515-90
•AMUAL
•C/fe9
11/21 Po<
71. V-
^:LLt=S
N:1E DISC
)1-4alY 5I5-90
"AIMAL
•
1.•N..2 .
C
TOGA CITY
OF MOWN
CPECN RESTSTIN
11.26-e4
PAGE 11
C R N ._
Ilse Q
OAiE
��OYNT
�£M001 __. _____
iTEN
�CRIFTION
_ICCOYIR Iq. lll�._ �9 Q• 111E331NE
�
'
Kris?
11/2/F04
$41.93
alias CO]PEN
LTG PUNCH
71.4610-113-90 -
MANUAL
Kris?
m21164
13.31.
64IKS COOPER
WINE DISC
71-4311-5/5.90
MANUAL
K71ST
21121'et
34?.99
GRIGGS CCOATR
VINE PORCH
71-4112-Sts•9111
MANUAL
Kris?
11/2I164
10.96-
G3IG)S MACH
WINE DISC
FI-4313-St5-90
MANUAL
-
'
KF16.
31/71/64
1.496.49
gun I'T WINE
LTG PUNCH
7i-4aio-sis-9c
MANUAL
w rlbI
1112115. -
rP,F 2-
CUILIIY 6-NE
LID 3/SC
ri-4e11-SIS-90
MANUAL
Kr101
II M F-4
Is../
warn V.ME
WINE Drc
71-4311-515-90
MANUAL
Krieg
11R1184
13.11.
OJALI'T CIE
LID DISC
71-4P 11-5 IS.w
-ANUAL
K PIS.
11/71/54
661.15
COAL. IT YINE
WINE PARCH
FI-43t2-5I5-90
MANUAL
Ki16i
I1/21184
SGT.99
OUILI Y YPE
WINE PORCH
71-49/2-S1Fw
MANUAL
Krieg
11/21/54
S41.99.
WAL: 17 W14C
WINE Disc
71-Ae1i-sls-w
MANUAL
K?1 6M
111211-4
I?. -I
DUALITY Y:NE
MINE 014C
71-4e13.513.9C
-ANUAL
.C/1.+
II021164
1".11-
QUALITY YT%E
Y:YE DISC
71-4613-515-w
-ANU4L
MC1136
IIM's1
11.12.
DJLLITT N'nL
WISE DISC
71-4613-SIS-90
MANUAL
?.III." -
'
'Cf.,A
11121f64
24.-3
MAN A:NTILS
UT!L 1104 144U 11194
7I-4124-515.93
MANUAL
Kfl2l
11121/4.
I.7S:.'3
Ail I'ST4.S
RTN:
71-4332-S1S.90
MANUAL
76,:3 -
MD/1 N:
I1/21/14
71.'.
T) sM 2L 121]
WINL PYi4
71-4912-515-90
MANUAL
MCL .'
111111s4
1. 1y.
eM M:LLIIS
4144 Disc
7t-4011•SIS-91
MANUAL
MCF,"
IT17114A
v t•-?
r.:)N': AN;
A:NE PORCH
71-43l2.SIS-9D
MAP:
.C/t..
11/21/64
%.?a.
]•11I4CJNTL PAS
Y•NC Mt
71-4473-SIS-93
M:M
Is.." .
'
.:Ill?
1112I.44
IA..?
NIC•,
C:nFf:c4lxl
74-4556.S90-93
36.'3 .
KI1af
11 RI/94
6e.2S
3t TILLS 3S C'%T
: 13/22
11 Il/4
:1-4112-939-12
MANUAL
.CF193
11/71124
54..1
ST TS;A1 SC :INT
- -: 10122
T) 1114
-1-1112-040.13
MAIry11.
_
MC7113
11/21/14
1.72
3' TA.'s 1L C)Ns
P ::4 ID/22
T' 11/4
'1-1142-]59-11
IANU:L
ti m -3
11171141
157.74
57 TR•2S SS CHIT
F:C: 13122
TO 1114
(t-4142.369-IS
PANULL
Kl1•.3
11/71/14
44./2
ST I1723 :3 C'-NT
F:C3 10,22
TM Ill,
1.1112-099-17
14YUAL
Kft+s
1111/1R4
49.20
37 T4; K I3 C!NT
4 1O/22
'C 1114
'1-1L12-I1S.31
4INUAL
'
K11a!
11/21/4.
?9).ze
ET TRTLS [S CIIT
[tC: •0/22
T) 1114
:1-1112-174-31
4AN12L
Kf193
11/21/e4
`52• Q
$Y Ti}S SS ^.JUT
F:C1 13122
T` 1111
-1-1142-249.42
MANUAL
'
NC1193
it/71/M,
22.-1
ST. T9TAS :3 C2N1
FICA 10122
1) 11/1
•.1112-29o-l1
MANUAL
KrM
111.714,
.10
ST TISAS ' :'IT
FICA 10/22
T) I'll
11_4112-40S.OG
MANUAL
Kf193
1,127114
??0?
IT MAS SS C)'.T
RCA 13112
e! t1f4
Fn4uE-515-90
MANUAL
•
HCf 1N3
11171/.4
0,12
:' 1-4Ls .3 C,MT
PICA 10,22
rL 1114
72-,112-S49.91
MANUAL
7C/1Y3
11171194
1". •'?
ST TSEAS E3 CO-11
F:CA 10/22
T• 1114
12-4142-549-91
-ANUAL
K/1-3
11,21,44
127.13
$T T4E2S SS C)NT
F/:4 1012E
TO 1114
75-4I42-569-92
MANUAL
K1/93
I Itl 144
77.19
$1 I. -AS 3S C)nT
FICA 10121
i'. 11/4
74-41L2-S90-93
MANUAL
1.14•.12
P,
Kr'94
11121,94
2.4e•.36
DILLITY Y:M.
L:J PARCH
71-4910-Si S•9C
.ANUAL
.C/1:4
11121/14
49.".
JUILI-T WINE
L:D D:SC
71-4411-515-90
MANUAL
2.439.,1 .
Kr W5
111211.4
2.11R.41
OR:03 CO2-EA
UG 7YACH
r.4a•9-511•91
Nu1ULL
G
1914 CITY
OF 0110D0
-
CRECR R161STER
11-26-54 PASS 10
•
E
CM[G F0.
DATE
ANGUNT _
IEIOOi_
_I1SR DESCRIPTION
_. ACCOUNT R0. IRN.
6►.0. N MESSAGE
•
we 195
11121/N4
43.27-
GRL6GS COVER
LIM DISC
71-4611. 515-90
NANUK
R
K1193
11M 114
43.27.
0IGG5 Cccn4
LID DISC
714811.s15-90
MANUAL
K7195
111211e4 -
43.27
CRIGSS Col -EA
LIN DISC
71-1e11.515-90 ----
MANUAL
Ka195
11121/ea
259.67
9A:655 CO3.EA
NINE PUNCH
71-4112-SIS-90
MANUAL
L
-
KF195
1112144
6.^7-
611"S COVER
NINE DISC
H-lets-slS-W
MANUAL
_
2.34C.30•
1
K7196
11/21/94
9r.36
ED PPILL:-S
LIS PURCM
71-4810-515-93
MANUAL
K/194
Il/21/tlt
19.55.
-D PM!LLI-S
L:0 DISC
71-4311-515-90
PANUAL
•
Ka19e
1112t19.
1063.56
ED P47LLIFS
NTNE PURCM
71-4J12-S1S-93
MANUAL
C
K/196
11/21At
34.•0.
-O PP:LL!-S
AINE Oise
71-4913-S1S-9C
14IUAL
2.l l9.ea .
c
Ka19/
11/11ea
14.49
CRISIS C
LI6 PUNCH
71-4e10-515-9D
-UAL
Ki197
il/2f I6a
2. '-
a9"
w:6Gi Col."
L:0 CSC
al-tH bs15--C
•'%ANJ AL
743.15 -
M:F19R
1117111.
3e9.47
P4]
N!kc -URCN
71.4e12.515-90
MA.;J-L
'
KF19t
1112111.
1.61.
CITEICINTL PIG
a:NE OISC
a1-4113-s1s-90
-A.I'JAL
132.'6
e
......
.. -EMS
11.A4.11
-UN^ :9 TO':L
G-N:-:L -LLAI
3.114.14
cUNI it TOTAL
.:I- 'MFR]N' -E11LNI•IG
F
'UM 11 TGILL
L:DNCi O-ER:':bG cU NO
2. Ztad2
-U15 al TOTAL
•4TEA WE4ar Its "no
24 .'i •.•-
-U47 II TCT-L
;EN-- O9.-A :N1 FJN]
�
3A4.44
-P19 14 TCTK
5YF CSU PSE ]P z43-p6
PC
Planning Commission
PUBLIC ATTENDANCE
CITY OF ORONO
MEETING DATE II-aIo-Q�-
PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS.
NAME OR NUMDER
NAME (please print) ADDRESS nocP ee,m r
Benda)
IS
2. ii �T .,
�e,.
I/S3_
I�jiN/SO4
c Arc! Co ,-
'4:
WN,'
#y
7.
8.
9.
L0.
L1.
L2.
.3.
.4.
.5.
+
6.
7.
8.
9.
0.
JnfOrjna+iOrj
IE 4-enn s
comn ci I fA "
ad ki - 10
PL, mmm�
A-2308, Hennepin County Government Center, Minneapolis. Mr' 95487 • (612) 34841466
Minl,esot,? Prutcrt on Corpo, I.-. .
706 First Bank Place West, Minneapolis, MN 55402 • (612)
October, 1984 P61:TY�Q=FQRQ146v'
Dear Business and Community Leader:
A critical social issue is before us: How can we provide for the long-term care of
the very old in the years ahead? Minnesota's elderly population is expanding
dramatically, while the cost of caring for the very old has become staggering. An
overreliance upon nursing homes has pushed expenditures beyond reasonable limits
for families and government alike. Fundamental changes in the long-term care system
are essential.
Take a look at the facts:
-- Minnesota now has 53,000 elderly over age 85. By the year 2010, ';:lie number of
elderly over age 85 will more than double --to 112,5006
-- The elderly, especially those age 85 and over, are the most likely to ^.ffer from
chronic and degenerative diseases that require long-term care.
-- Traditional nursing home care is costly, presently exceeding S839 million
annually and consuming over two-thirds of Minnesota's Medicaid budget.
,ennepin County and the Minnesota Project on Corporate Rc risibility have formed a
urique public/private partnership to focus community attention on these concerns.
The enclosed report, 85 And Beyond: The Challenge of Minnesota's Elderly,
minates the first phase of the partnership. This report outlines the present
situation and issues a challenge to community leaders such as yourself to work
together to forge new directions offering mnre options for long-term t'sr-e in the
future. Maintaining quality care developing programs and products that promote
self-sufficiency and self-responsihi1 lty can became a reality when business,
government and elderly consumers and their families work in concert.
Our public/private partnership is weale.axploring specific ways W .evelop and promote
practical alternatives for meeting t-he needs of our community's growing elderly
population. As you read 85 And Beyond, we hope you will the information of
interest, and that you will look for onportunities to part ce in the shapinq of
our community's long-term care system. your leadership is Cal to the successful
resolution of this critical social issue.
Since--ly,
Dale Olseth Commissioner Richaru E. Kremer
Minnpsota Project on Corporate Hennepin Warty Board of
Resc,nsihillty Commissioners
85 AND BEYOND:
The Challenge of
Minnesota's Elderly
HENNEPIN COUNTY.. MINNESOTA PROJECT ON CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY
HENNEPIN COUNTY . MINNESOTA PROJECT
ON CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY
This report has been developed through a partnership between Hennepin County and the Minnesota
Project on Corporate Responsibility. Its purpose, and the purpose of the partnership, is to focus commun-
ity attention on the issue of long-term care for the elderly The report is intended to serve as a spring-
board for dialogue between corporate and government leaders on how to respond to the health and
social needs of our elderly citizens into the next century
It: If, r-fIf' rl!('-
The Minnesota Prolec' on Corporate Responsibility and
Hennepin County express appreciation to the many people
who contributed to this report Among them are Jay Green-
berg of Brandeis Univers,ty and Alice Kethh,�y of I,iterAye
Special thanks to Health Futures Institute and Cynthia L
Polich who provided the data on which 85 Ana Beviind is
based The sponsors also are grateful to the Fiemru.,jiin
County Pubf►c Affairs Department la editorial and dosK#n
assistance Furxfing for this ptri watiov was Qerx1r0xiwly
provided by Modtronic: Inc
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Mark Andrew. Hennepin County Commissioner.
71h District
Fdward W Asplin, Bemis Company, Inc
John E Derus, Hennepin County Commissioner
4th Di%lrirt
Thomas E Holloran. Inter -Regional Financial
Group. Inc
Randy Johnson, Hennepin County Commissioner
2nd District
David A Koch, Graco. Inc
Richard E Kremer, Hennepin County
Commissioner, 3rd District
Donald W McCarthy, Northern States Power
Company
'Dale R O;seth. Medtronic, Inc
John E Pearson, Northwestern National Life
Insurance Company
E F Robb. Jr . Hennepin County Commissioner
5th District
Walter D Scott. IDS/American Express
Sarn S Sivanich Hennepin County Commissioner
61h District
Jeff Spartz Hennepin County Commissioner
t st District
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
Date Ackmann,
Hennepin County Administrator
Stanley R Cowie
Piper Jaffray and Hopwood Inc
James Holland. Jr .
First Bank Minneapolis
Verne C Johnson.
Allcare Corporatien
Richard E Kremer
Hennepin County U)mmissionei
Dale R Olaetf>t,
Medtron; Inc
'Chairman
STAFF
Philip C Eckhert
0onalld O Ine,+and
Nancy M Devitt
Hrrkrvn t t Hines
CaiAv S Marlin Seplembe!r 1964
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The aging of our population presents one of the most dif-
ficult social challenges facing our nation and our state —
how to provide for the long-term care needs of the
elderly Problems of caring for the elderly are being expe-
rienced by many families Government. too, is experienc-
ing increasing difficulty meeting the needs of its eluerly
citizens. especially those 85 and over. who are the fas-
test growing segment of the older population
There is a growing consensus among Minnesotans that
the long-term care system must change Public respon-
sibility for care of the elderly has increased greatly in the
last two decades Minnesota now spends $839 million
annually on Medicaid, two-thirds of this amount paying
r,r urn, for nursing home care The coming population explosion
txi tna: u, among the very old will push these expenditures conSid-
erably higher if we continue to care for the elderly as we
do today The elderly and their families also are dissatis-
fied with Minnesota s long-term care syStern. primarily
because It emphasizes costly nursing horse care that
can quickly drain a family's savings and force depen-
dence on public assistance
Services and pit. icts that would enable many older
people to remain Self -sufficient could benefit govern-
ment. taxpayers. the elderly. and their families alike Most
elderly and their families view nursing homes as a last
rescrt The elderly would prefer other forms of services
and housing that allow and encourage self-sufficiency
and support their continued independence
This report, developed through a partnership between
the pucltc and the private sectors. issues a chal'enge to
the leaders of government and businr.,s work together
to develop policies, programs and products that will sup-
per' ;elf -sufficiency and self -responsibility among the
elderly The challenge of 85 And Beyond represents an
opportunity for all segments of our community to improve
the security and well-being of Minnesota's older citizens
Wit-'i i strong and shared commitment to resolve this crit-
ical issue, and with leadership working in concert busi-
ness and government can meet this challenge
INTRODUCTION
f,Jc_ ;et before have there been so many oider people. and
ne:e► before have they been so old The aging of our
population presents one of the most difficult social chal-
lenges facing our nation and our stale —how to provide
for the long-term care needs of the elderly
Wh,le substantial resources are being directed toward
long-term care, demographic trends indicate that the
future demand for such care by Minnesota s elderly pop
ula!ion will be even greater than at present Our
concerns —as children, as parents, as taxpayers. as
responsible citizens and as persons who will one day be
aged —are intertwined as we consider the following
a Tne elderly population grew 17 percent frurm 1970 to
1980 whr'e the !otal slate population grew 14 percent
Be':veen now and the year 2010. the elderly population
Nil! grow 41 percent compared to a 17 percent gain in
the states total population
The elderly population will double in the next century.
but the ability of the wage earning segment of the popu-
'abon to support their needs is expected to be cut in halt
"'.nnesolans beyond age 85 arc the fastest growing
serj,nent of the older population 11 is this group that is
rc s! vulnerable to physical mental and social limitations
'he' 'lead to the need for care and services
lerly Minnesotans are twice as likely to be in nursing
—es as their peers elsewhere in the nation
a result of the rapidly increasing number of elderly
:. ring long-term care and Minnesota s heavy reliance
%rsing homes to provide that care costs have
-a'ated dramatically in recent years Minnesota ranks
;nil nationally in the percentage of Medicaid dollars
^g to nursing home care These expenditures grew
.::�T $95 million to nearly $554 million between 1973 and
!983
s !firs combination of forces which is prompting our
muntty to question our collective capacity to care for
•-•e aged especially the growing population beyond age
8= Probte-s of caring for the eldefh, are already being
ar'erienced by many families Government, too is expe-
1 J ^"rng increasing difficulties me cling the needs of its
e ;erly citizens These difficulties are likely to intensity in
' e 'uture raising serious questions about societal family
a personal responsibility for care of our elderly citizens
ndeed care of ourselves as aged citizens
This problem will not yield to simple solutions nor will it
suffice to assume that government will find the answers
or that we can continue to care for the elderly as we do
today
New directions and more choices are needed —policies.
programs and products which will enable the elderly of
tomorrow to live as self -sufficiently as possible Such far-
reaching changes car. come about however, only if the
public and private sectors work togethof to plan and
shape changes in the manner in which we respond to
the needs of the elderly and their families
This publication 85 And Beyond, has been developed
through a partnership between the pubbc and private
sectors —Hennepin County and the Minnesota Protect on
Corporate Responsibility
Its purpose. and the purpose of the partnership, is to
focus community attention beyond general concerns
about the elderly and beyond concerns about the next
fiscal year to the issue of long -terra care and its asso-
crated problems and opportunities
85 And Beyond, we feel is a most fitting title for this
report. for it signifies that the fastest growing group of
elderly are those who are 85 and older a group that
lends to have substantial personal care and health
needs
85 .4nd Beyond also signified that while the full extent of
the over-85 group s problems will not face us until early
in the next century we must begin now to identify and
develop socially and fiscally responsible policies pro-
grams and products to serve the elderly now and con-
tinue to work for future generations of elderly
85 And Beyond signifies finally. that for the issue of Icog-
ierrn care. the time has corne to took beyond the stand-
ard approac-hfs to funding and service delivery io new
and different approaches that promote and enable se►f-
responsibrirty as an alternative for many elderly
We have the, 111ne and the abild- to meet the challenge of
85 and beyond We now need ..immunity commitment to
begin the efforts to build the security and well-being of
tomorrow s elderly
The older population is the fastest growing group in Min-
nesota growing much faster than the slate's population
as a whole Over the last two decades. Minnesota's pop
ulation age 65 and over grew 34 percent, from 358,000
to 480.000 persons, while the total state population grew
19 percent
Life expectancy has increased from 48 years at the turn
of the century to 68 years in 1940 to 75 years today In
1900. those over 65 constitutel 4 percent of Minnesota's
population —66.800 individuals Today. the elderly com-
prise 12 percent of the state's population --480.000 per-
sons Eighty rears ago one in 26 Minnesotans was
elderly Today one in eight is elderly
1980 POPULATION BY AGE AND SEX
AGE GROUP MALE
r35 And Over
75 84
65 74 tttttasw<.
60 64
50.59
40.49
30 39
20 29
15.19
5-14
Unaer 5 lwsw-
TODAY'S CONCERN WITH
TOMORROW'S ELDERLY
Minnesotans have the second longest life expectancy in
the nation, surpassed only by Hawaiians At age 65, Mir
nesotans can expec! to live an additional 17 years, and
survival rates among the elderly are expected to improve
the years ahead
As the baby boom generation ages, the elderly will
increase their numbers significantly continue to grow: a,.
a faster pace than the rest of the population and grovr a=
a proportion of the state's total population By the year
2010. the elderly will represent 14 percent of the total
population. and by 2030. 17 percent of Minnesota s pop,
lation is expected to be over 65
eef
FIGURE 1
Population Changes in Minnesota
1980.2010
FFV,At i
V. .,—, . -
4r`0 300 200 100 0 100 200 i!!' V)1)
NUMBER IN THOUSANDS
PROJECTED POPULATION IN 2010
BY AGE AND SEX
AGE GROUP
85 And Over
75 84
65 '4
MALE
60.64
50 59
40 49
10 39 ���■
10 29
t5 19
5-t4 rl�r
Ur+der 5
-inn
FEMALE
'M ?r10 1!xi 0 too 1") 'bx1
NUM111 14 IN THt)W`vAN')S
The youth population is shnnkiny and the elderly are grow -
my faster than we rest of Minnesota s papulah<In 1h y
trend is a .pected to intensify in the early 21st century
M
SOLO" State Demo rarw,
The growth in the number of elderly is only part of the
story The newest demographic phenomenon is the
aging of the group itself
The fastest growing segment of the older population of
the very old —those beyond age 85
The number of Minnesotans beyond age 85 grew 56 5
percent between 1970 and 1980 compared to an
increase of 17 percent in the elderly population as a
whole and an increase of 14 percent 1n the age 65-74
orouo
Currently. 11 percent of the older population is 85 and
over and this proportion 1s expected to increase to 17
r,- rent hv the year 2010 The very old now constiiutr
one in nine of those over 65-53.000 persons By 2010
one of every six elderly will be over 85, and the over-85
group will grow to 112,500 persons
This increase in the number of elderly and the growing
number of Minnesotans beyond age 85 will have a
marked impact on Minnesota This impact will be felt par-
ticularly in our health and social service systems The
elderly. especially those age 85 and over. are the most
likely to suffer fromdependency•inducing chronic and
degenerative diseases In fact. 35 percent of all Minneso-
tans over the age of 85 live in nursing homes and
receive around -the -clock care
FIGURE 2
Comparison of Population Growth of
Persons 65 and Over with Persons 85 and Over.
Minnesota 1970-2010
60
50
w
rn
Q
uJcc 40
U
Z_
w
C7 334
a.
�- 30 299
Z
w
U
ul
LL1 � � 3 ��
Q nrjE GROUPS
20
65 and over
146
8. and
126
10
0
1970-1980 1980-1990 1990-2000 2000-2010
(Protected) (Projected) (PrOW111111,11:ll)
The laste+t growing w-gmPnf of the o1Mrr rKrpulsloon is the very oid flits
beyond a" 95 °kno r 41are up--.p+40W
EXTENDED LONGEVITY
BRINGS IKCREASED
DEPENDENCY
Currently there are 40,300 elderly Minnesotans In mirs-
ing homes and 40 percent of these residents are of r W;
In addition, there are about 66,000 older people in lay
nesota Irving In the community who need the help o' 1'
least one other person to live Independently These
elderly require help with eating, bathing using the loilet.
dressing, home medical care, housekeeping, transporta
tion, shopping, money management and decision -
making, and are Irequently as impaired as their nursing
home counterparts It Is this population which is at risk of
institutronai placement, especially those In their 80 s a -id
90's who.lrvtalone
Familim OF the bulk of care needed by this depen-
dent segment of the older population, sometimes aug-
mented by community support services and rnedical
care The range of medical social community and insti-
tutional services needed by chronically dependent older
people is called long -terra care
MINNESOTA'S LONG-TERM
CARE SYSTEM
When most people think of long -terra care, they irnme-
diately think of nursing home care Long-term care and
nursing homes are not synonymous. however Long -tern
care Includes a continuum of services from homemaker
home health aide, home nursing and adult day-care to
rehabilitation sheltered housing and nursing home care
Long-term rare can be provided in the home in a nurs-
Ing home or in specially designed housing for the
elderly It ranges from very Intensive and expensive
services - 24 hour care --to occasional help around the
house from trends or relatives
FIGURE 3
Breakdown of Public Expenditures for
Long -Term Care of the Elderly in Minnesota 1180
400
350
300
250
Z a: 200
OILQ
J O J 1,41
0
10
t0TA1 I'I'HI i,
I x11f NI) .
While it Is true that long-term care Include a _ -
uurn of services which arrn provided both by G•_'eSs
als and family members Minnesota s long -le, -
tern relies extensively on nursing home carer
nursing homes to care for the elderly is near,
national average In Minnesota 9 percent of
population is Institutionalized compared to lus*
percent nationally Moreover the state ranks
the number of nursing hornq beds per 1 000
our nursing home spending s S126 per cape':- :.3
to S68 in the United States as a whole
Nun -institutional forms of care called in-Mor-e a-
community -based services are unclerdeveloced :- '!
nesota compared to the institutional system J' e,�•,
public dollar spent on long tern care only 10 -er *s s
Of every public dollar spent or long-term care. only 10 cents is spent (in In home and community support services
spent on in -home and community support services such
as home nursing. home health aide. homemaker, chore
services and adult day rare.
The number of elderly Minnesotans living in nursing
homes grew sharply over the last decade, from 29,000
persons in 1970 to 40.000 persons to 1980 Most of this
increase can be traced to the increase to the population
85 and over
Projected increases in the very old population. those
most at risk of needing long-term care. indicate a contin.
uation Of enormous growth in spending for institutional
care. By 1990. a 22 percent increase in the number of
nursing home residents can be expected if Minnesota
continues to rely on nursing horses as it has in the past
This means that another 10.500 beds would have to be
built to order to accommodate this population growth,
and public expenditures would rise to over nyi 5 billion
annually by the end of the decade The public financial
requirements for this expansion of facilities and services
are significant and unsettling. especially in view of con-
cerns about Minnesota's business climate and tax
policies.
It is unlikely, however, that the expansion of our long-
term care system which occurred in the 1960s and
1970s can be replicated in the 1980s and 1990s Tax-
payers won I lolerale it and public officials know it Wit-
ness the following
a Minnesota has revised its nursing horse reimburse -
anent formula under Medicaid from a cost-plus formula to
a flat rate system and placed a moratorium on the con-
struction of new nursing home beds.
is The federal government has given states permission to
require financial contributions from families loward the
care of elderly to nursing homes who are supported by
Medicaid
a Medicare will now reimburse hospitals a flat fee on the
basis of diagnosis. creating an incentive fur early dis-
charge of elderly patients who may then need follow-up
care.
The effects of these cost -containment efforts will take
time to realize, but it is doubtful that they will be sufficient
to reduce the current aged population's dependency on
the public sector Clearly the coming population explo-
sion among the very Old threatens the states ability to
finance long-term care services in the future Minnesota
must find different ways of caring for the elderly espe-
cially the very old We must find ways of meeting their
needs without compromising the quality of care that Min-
nesotans have corne to expect
FIGURE 4
Comparison of Residence of the Elderly and
Public Long -Term Care Expenditures
Minnesota, 1980
RESIDENCE OF ELDERLY POPULATION
PUBLIC LONG-TERM CARE EXPENDITURES
IN HOME
INSTITUTIONALIZED
COMMUNITY BA
4fi'o
SE RVIC
Y
I
tS
c
o
NURSING HOME
CANE
a
o
C
e
Total Severely Imj; aired'
Total Service Expenditures
f Population 65*.
$422 million
3 100,000 Persons
Sixty percent of Marne%ola'a severely
impaired elderly population
live in their own homes but they receive
only tp percent of public
service e.prndifures for their care
WHO PAYS FOR LONG-TERM CARE?
Public assistance, chiefly M3dlcald, now covers 57 per-
cent of nursing home expenditures The remainder I,
paid for privately through patients' incomes from Social
Security, pension payments. Investment Income, savings.
liquidation of assets, and the like. Private Insurance for
the full range of long-term care services Is not available
and Medicare does not cover long-term, custodial nurs-
ing home care
This reliance on the public sector for nursing home care
expenditures can be traced to the introduction of the
federal and state funded Medicaid program In 1965 Prior
to the introduction of Medicaid, the nursing home Indus-
try was relatively small. and the cost of nursing home
care was mostly borne privately I:•• y
Two Important changes accompanied the Introduction of
the Medicaid program The nursing home Industry bur-
geoned. and public responsibility for care of the elderly
increased greatly, often succeeding private responsibility
for the many Institutionalized elderly who simply outllveo
their own resources Nearly half the elderly that Medicaid
supports were not Initially poor. but have become a pub-
lic responsibility after using up their own resources on
the cost of long-term care, costs that now average
$20.000 per year.
The help that many older people need to remain in their
own homes —homemaker and cjlore services. shopping
assistance, help with personal care, and sitters —are no -
covered by Medicare or Insurance and thus must be
purchasPd privately unl"s an older person Is eligible for
public social services
FIGURE 5
Historical Growth in Minnesota Medicaid Expenditures
1970-1983
Nursing home f- a consumes Ivro Thuds of Mmnrsofa s Me,- a
budget
900 Z
I 800
7
701;
cn —
cc r
Q
J 2
J —
O
r ) 500 1�;•, —
tL —
0 r d(' J
cn 400 a,
Z
(D
'RX)
J t_
:10C V
100 >
�Zf
1470 1W 1911, 1973 1414 191') 1977 IW8 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983
Source Wnnftots Depertnwnt of Pub"c woit&re
CAN VIDE AFFORD TO TAKE CARE OF OUR ELDERLY?
Medicaid eorpenditures increased nearly live -told in the
period from 1970 to 1980. rising front $110 million to
5566 million during the decade and exceeding the rate of
inflation by two -and -one-half trines Nursing home care
FIGURE 6
Future Minnesota Medicaid Expenditures'
Assuming constant 1980 instituhonahtahon rates and an annual
,ale .ncrease of 6 percent per Minnesota Chapter 199 passed by
-me t9RI Legrslatwe
I80
N
cc
J
J
0
LL
J
n
z
J
J
nuw consurr s two-thirds of this budget and this percen-
tage has gee .:rally been increasing from year to year
Minnesota rc As second nationally in the percentage of
Medicaid go tg to nursing homes
;! 19Hn: 198-4 1 ynt,
Protected increases in the very old population suggest con-
tinued enormous growth on spending for long-term care
NEW DIRECTIONS, MORE CHOICES
There is a growing consensus among Minnesotans that
the long-term care system must change. For most elderly
and their families, nursing homes are a last resort It has
been well -documented that the elderly would prefer other
forms of services and housing that allow and encourage
self-sufficiency and support their continued indepen-
dence The following example illustrates one such new
direction in long-term care
4n 86 year old woman who lives alone needs assistance
to get out of bed, to get in and out of the bathtub, and to
fix meals She takes daily medication. but because she
has short-term memory difficulties, she must be
reminded to take the medication. In a nursing home she
would receive skilled nursing level care at a cost of
about $60 per day. She and her family would prefer,
however, that she remain in her own home Every week-
day an aide spends four hours helping this woman with
her personal care and household tasks On weekends
this woman's daughter brings her groceries and lakes
her to church In addition, her daughter calls several
times a day to make sure everything is ail right The
home care provided by the aide costs about $36 per day,
40 percent !ess than nursing home care would cost.
Since around -the -clock care is not needed, home care is
the type of care preferred by this woman and her family.
Home care of the elderly is not a new idea. but new
ideas are needed on how to finance market and deliver
the kind of care older people need and can afford
Government and the private sector are developing pro-
grams to reduce reliance on nursing home care, and
demonstrations of some of these programs are in pro-
gress in Minnesota For example.
a Ebenezer Society and :Troup Health. Inc. have formed
Medicare Partners, a pre-j, aid "social -HMO " In addition
G7
to the regular rrivU+cal services of an HMO. Medicare
Partners will offer a long-term rare benefit including both
nursing home care and in -home rare, but substituting
lower cost home care for nursing home care whenever
possible
a Wilder Foundation ---a provider of a full continuum of
services to the elderly, Health Central —a health care
management corporation. and St. Paul -Ramsey Medical
Center --a public hospital. have joined together to offer
the Senior Health Plan, pie -paid health insurance which
will bridge acute care and long-term care
a Allcare Development Corporation. a p-7rtnership
between General Mills and Wilder Foundation. offers ven4
►ure capital and technical assistance to other ofgarnza-•
lions aflernpling to develop innovative hearth and long-
term care services.
a Duluth's King Manor, a publicly sponsored congregate.
apartment, infers multiple levels of care and services to
help older people remain at home even when they need
daily assistance
• Minnesota's Nursing Home Pre -Admission Screening
and Alternative Care Program is a staiewrde mandated
effort to divert nursing home applicants by offering
appropriate home care services such as homemaker
home health aide. and respite care for families.
While it is too early to conclude that any of these demon-
strations will solve our community's long-term care prob-
lems or be suitable for all older people. there is consen-
sus that they represent welcome new directions in
long-term care and are in tune with the preferences of
Minnesota's elderly citizens
FORCES OF CHANGE:
WHOSE PROBLEM, WHOSE
RESPONSIBILITY?
This report has locused on public costs for long -terra
care. the growth in public responsibility for care of the
elderly, and the drffir ullres foreseen in maintaining Mon
nesota s long-term care systern
Today's long -terra care system is out of balance and out
of step with ,he needs and preferences of moss Minne-
sota families As things stand now, publicly supported
programs emphasize rnslotur,onal care and provide
assistance only after individuals have spent nearly at; of
tnerr savings on such costly rns!ilut,onal care Once an
,ndovrdual becomes a public resoonsrbrlrty. a life-long
dependency relationship with the government is
established
As Minnesotans we place a high value on our indepen-
dence and our ability to care for ourselves and our fami-
bes Thrs desire for self - sufficiency is an important asset
as our search intensifies for solutions to the impending
long-term care crisis While government s rote will always
be to care for the poor. most families would rather not
look toward public assistance as an answer
The elderly population of the future will not be like our
stereotype of today s elderly —poor and isolated. Tomor-
roh, s elderly demographers say will be more educated
and affluent and increasingly determined to preserve and
arotect their health their assets and their independence
They will be increasingly determined to exercise their
cnorces about the kind of care they will receive and
:, nor -re they will live
%P.v consumer and n3rketing possibilities can be envo-
oned as responses to the aging of our population This
could benefit government. taxpayers and elderly consum-
e-s and their families by making available services and
croducts which could enable many older people to
,emaon self-sufficient
FOR EXAMPLE
Long -tern, care insurance could be developed which
would pool the risk of chronic impairment to help people
protect and prese>'velMe+r estates Other than Medicaid
no ►hold -party ►ermbarmooment exists to cover most long
!elm care costs, exosrrng insurance programs cover
acute inpatient .rod outpatient care only Long-term care
•nsurancu c" quid be an alternative to the public funding of
cog -term care services Consumers. by purchasing
_rig -term care insurance beginning in middle age. would
be able to privately finance their long-term care
a Equ►ly conversion plans could he developed and mat,
«eted to he,p some homeowners rem,.,rn in their
own homes and have!,: source of income with which l,o
purchase home care as well as properly maintain their
homes Carefully designed, home equity conversion
plans could provide a needed financial cushion, allev+ah�
constant anxiety about money, and even provide for
supportive care without forcing older homeowners to
deplete all of heir resoruces in order to quality for public
assistance
. Tax deferred savings accounts dedicated to long-term
care could be developed to encourage people to set
aside money for care needed later Unused monies rn
such accounts could be returned to a person's estate,
thereby creating the incentive to use costly rnsatutional
care only as a last resort.
. More housing alternatives which would bridge the gap
between independent loving and a nursing home are
needed Such housing could be designed flexibly to
accommodate "aging in place "
. Services to provide relief to families could be devel-
o:)Pd and marketed to extend the time families wnuld
con.trnue to provide care and support to their dependent
spouses or parents Such respite services might include
adult day-care. electronic personal emergency response
systems, home health aide service and support groups
for famdv caregivers
. Corporate self-help networks of retied employees
could be developed to survey the needs of their
members and provide information and assistance Such
networks could by used to facilitate many needed ser-
vices amcng retirees, such as house sharing ransporta-
tion, and help with home repairs
. "High-tech" biomedical products could be developed
which wog',; increase the self-sufficiency of impaired
people and decrease their needs for constant medical
care and supervision New technologies could be ap-
plied for example, to ►he problems of incontinence and
mental impairments two of the major causes of rns:+lu-
tionalizat+on in old urge
Clearly there is no one solutrmnlm-1111O npendrng crisis in
long-term care Adjustments rn aN .institutions will
be needed in order to cope with increased longevity and
the effects of medical advances in our society Moreover
the net result of developing and financing alternatives to
institutional care may be an increase in total casts for
long-term care. at least on the short rut; In the long run,
however, this course must be followed it we are to ade-
quately meel the needs that can be anticipated as a
result of the rapid growth in the elderly population
The aging of our population will severely test our ability
to meet future human needs. The purpose of this report.
developed through a partnership between the public and
private Sectors. is to focus community attention on one of
our most difficult social challenges --how Io provide for
the long-term care needs o' current and future elderly
citizens
It this state and this community are to be successful in
addressing this issue. we must begin by discarding the
CONCLUSION
assumption that the problern of long-►errn care is Solely a
government responsibility The challenge of 95 and
Ueyond represents an opportunity for all segments of the
community to improve the security and well -bung of
Minnesota s older citizens With a strong and shared
cornmrtrnent to resolve this critical issue, and with lead-
ership working in concert. business and government can
meet this challenge together
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY
.122*1
A 1603 Government Center •
HENNEPIN
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0163
Lp 1
612-348-6846
COUNCIL MEETING
NOV 2 G 1%
Noveribe r 13, 1984
CITY OF ORONO
M V" !T MAY ONCEPA7
Re: Public Hearing on Surcharge Ordi.nar:c:e
In a otter dated August 23, 1984, Hearepin County infc:med interested parties
of tht: intent of the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners to impose a
25-cent-pe:-cubic-yard fee on the disposal of nuxed municipal solid waste at
solid waste facilities in Hennepin County, beginning January 1, 1985.
The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners has set November 29, 1984, as the
date for a public hearing concerning this surcharge ordinance. A public
hea_ing will be field at 10:00 A.M in the Commissioners' Board Roan, 24fh
Floor, Administration Tbwer, Hennepin County Government Center, 300 South 6th
Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Michc.ei Brandt of
our departrient, at 348-3774, or me at 3-40-46.
Sincerely,
Luther D. Nelson, P.F.
Director
LDN/NM :mvr
QM
HENNEPIN COUNTY
an eQw l oppo(%,noV tm.�. e,
PARK RESERVES
BAKER
CARVER
CROW.I �SSAN
ELM CREEK
HYLAND LAKE
LAKE REBECCA
IIURPNY HANREHAN
REGIONAL PARKS
BRYANTLAKE
CLEARY LAKE
CLIFT JN E FRENCH
COON RAPIDS DAII
EAGLE LAKE
FISH LAKE
JAMES W WILK4
LAKE SARAH
SPRING LAKE
SPECIAL USE AREAS
ARTNURE ALLENWILDt IFE
SANCTUARY
BAKER PARK GOLF COURSE
CLEARY LAKE GOLF COURSE
HYLAND HILLS SKI AREA
NO( RE NBE AG ME MOR IAL PARK
WAWATASSO ISLAND
WILD GOOSE CAUSE ISLAND
TRAIL COAHIDORS
NORTH HENNEPIN TRAIL
BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS
DAVID LATVAA1I0
C.A1R
GOLDEN VA; : E r
WILLIAM N BOYNTON
VIE CHAIR
ST LOUIS PARK
JUOITH E ANDERLON
P' OCIMINGTON
►ATRICIA D BAKER
MINNEAPOL IS
ENIRIEY A. BONINE
MAPLE PLAIN
WIL►IAM 1. NOLBRDOK
MINNEAW_ L • S
ECO" L. NE IMAN
MINNEAPOPS
VERN 1 NAIITINOURG
SUPERINTENDENT
SECRETARY TO THE BOARD
Hennepin County Park Reserve District
3800 County Road 24 • Maple r Minnesota 55359 • Telephone 612.473-4693
November 5, 1984
Honorable Mary Butler
Mayor of Orono
P 0 Box 66
crystal Bay, MN 55323
Dear Mrs. Butler,
COUNCIL MEETING
rjov ;? 6 1984
CITY OF ORONO
As we've discussed several times on the phone, the Park
District has established an advisory committee for the
Noe renberg Memorial County Park. Enclosed is a roster of
committee members. The chairman is Dick Cray. The committee
has met twice, first on Wednesday, October 17, when it toured
the garden and the adjoining park property at Noerenberg.
The second meeting was held on Thursday, November 1 at the
Freshwater Biological Institute.
The District Board charged the committee with 3 primary
tasks as follows:
1. To advise staff in the review of the Master Plan for
the Park.
2. To recommend appropriate changes in the Plan and
establish a long term working plan for preservation,
improvement and maintenance of the Park.
3. Recommend appropriate funding strategies for develop-
ment of the Park per the Master Plan.
Enclosed is a copy of the outline for the committee which the
Board approved and which describes the composition of the
committee, its schedule and other pertinent information. Also
enclosed is a skeletal work plan for the committee and a coP%
of Mrs. Hoppe's will conveying the property to the Park
District. Finally, I've enclosed a copy ,f the Master Plan
for the park which was prepared in 1977-78 and which the
committee is using as a starting pr•;_:It for their deliberations.
A copy of the agenda for the second meeting held November 1
is also encloser'. We distributed copies of the inventory of
floral display gardens in the Metro area to the committee
members at that times_. There was considerable discussion
regarding the will and the earlier Master Plan and a very
Informative presentation by Diann Coetten of Orono regarding
Orono's concerns (Agenda Item /4).
The next committee meeting is scheduled for 4:00 p.m. November 29
at the Freshwater Biological Institute. Thus far three items
are planned for that agends as follows:
ti
1. Interpretation of tiie will.
2. Presertation on the philosophy, background and plans of
the Izndscape Arboretum.
3. Potential concepts and themes for development of the
Noerenberg Memorial County Park.
I hope this information is of interest to you. We will keep
you inform►d as the conHnittee continues its work. I would like
to schedul#_ a presentation before the Orono City Council re-
garding th:, as soon as possible. I will be contacting Jeanne
Mabusth in an attempt to find a suitable time for such a pre-
sentdtion. Please contact me if you have any concerns or thoughts
as the coininitt(>e continues its work.
Sincerely,
Marty en
Central Division Manager
M,I / nm
Mrs. James Fish J. Diann Goetten Mickey Goldman
19005 12th Ave. No. 1385 Fox St. 5200 W. 74th St.
Plymouth, MN 55447 Orono, MN 55391 Edina, MN 55435
Richard Gray
2500 Shadywood Rd., Box 90
Navarre, MN 55392
Glen Ray
161 Alderman Hall
University of MN
St. Paul, MN 55108
Bob Kojetin
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, MN 55424
Hank Serwat
4186 Brookside Ave. So.
St. Louis Park, MN 55426
n
Barbara Kaerwer
12800 Gerard Dr.
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
George Rector
2655 North Shore Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
JoEllen Hurr
930 Partenwood Rd.
Long Lake, MN 55356
Bob Mugaas
3410 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Michael Heger
3675 Arboretum Cc.
P.O. Box 39
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Barb Peterson
P.O. Box 164
Crystal Bay, MN
Mrs. Henry Doerr Toni Riley
2306 West Huntington Point R(ad 908 E. Shady Lane
Wayzata, MN 55391 Wayzata, MN 55391
01 9/04
HL.NNE-P I l CUlq 11 Y PA11.. 1,*L'-A-+, 1t D 1 S 1 W G I
CITIZENS CL1MM I,rTEE FOR THE: NUUd- NOLRG MEMORIAL COUM rY PARK
iLt� t' The Hennepin County Park Reserve DisArict Board of
Commi ,si uners sees the need l ur a cmom i ttr-�• represent i ng
.a broad sper_trum of public inter eats to .advise an
matters I?fwt;.ining to thN plarirtinp 'arid ►"vt�i�.�`7mer►t. ��t
the Nrac-r•�4nberq Memarial uounty 11..tee is
est-ablicAted to:
1. i•scivise staff in tht- review and mod ifir_:,tion, 11
necessary, of the Master Pt m for th,.4 Part-
Rt�c:ommend apprupr i ki e f undi nq stratecO e--i i ar the
development of the park: per the Mister Pl1 m.
qlnu,gtuiThe Cummit.tee it,: structured •:o r.�t to de4ime dist-,it- +.
functions needed to a+ccompl i sh the committee ' r-§Vr' t,.
These functional sub -committees i roc 1 udti:
1 . Re(_r &_,'-_ajjcj F'4t�� k t_j5�. _. to def i ne
recreation programs and use of the Park and advi Ft -
on physical planning, deveI ,^mt..ant env c.,1�c. i-►tiy;
roe#_�jivd to del i vor- t ht�!t-e
Vj -_ p --- L o 4n-ilyze the
var i I. u i I d i r irt t h & Park for- historical
i i i t uf r t-s f allci s j gri i f i r- :iri c e and advIi!',e aAF to theil-
disposition in park. deve I opm-nri I-- -- r eten t i on
restoration, or demolitiun.
v at, i uLt,-,, sourres ancl
Devel apment to anal y.:. e
ad,., i L-e the Board on a plan -For financing the
development and opm te.tions of the Pork.
Because o-F thtz diview—Le L nvrj I ved in t. h P 1',W! ,
the following have been it Jc-1-1 t i f I Qd .as Latejgortf:�-i ior
which representation is nc-ci!dt:tl:
3. Horticulturc.-Mecreation (7) U of M Arboro-tum
Pler vin Lisel
I lor t i c tj I t u r a I
Htm,. i -)
MI-41-1 if:. I p�I I .
Flat) Ku,ietin,
I'din"4
Rec.
I I, - f I , - 0 -j .,I - I t ,
Flor k 1�1 v.
Friends of Mrs. I Ic-p p o (11 will Rilo)f
The local comnsumt y (Or C1101 E imp
4. Ths.? L-al-c-, Mirmotrinka f7osom-u-at->, I .I !I I.,
Mi r'nuapol I
-rh(e Ch ai r Iii -i , hit , •. 1 i 1 .1 ('— fu?ttv 0111.FIrl e.
L&I, tv r-w. I'l ve f 'ussiflut t t wor 1, 1 � I I 11. 0-11 -Ir-f I t
I i-r t
111 (fit I ,'.I L it-)( w 1-4 1 1 r- 4 if i , i
4()
V r i c- t Doa r d -.4 11 V 1L A t f 111 t,' ar i I i
f I
part devel opirwreii t the C 01111111 j P-•V.,
%,I
t f?gar-dim.) c-pet in
ofIr allf
that i s types; o r; i I m t e ri,..
ri-I-Ic alinii, j rig
*1 ho
c r3fom i t t w i I I not have ri r -t-spon. - i tp I
I t t y i n ongoi.
o-I
- 40 4 :Ai I .- , I t! t I t. j � in t j
t i p - f v o t ha
t,IVI
he c�lsnmi I 02t, f41 oi?ni- I t if c.r
I Iwr•.t.� �, :;c 1lre� Cc�nuat = ►.r•t- ari 11 muet un a mont.hI y ba!- t
review imd EinaI%ze pert invent facts lr. w) i 1 t-hell fogy 1.
quarterly wit-h sub-comaittee meet:in+7t3 in but.wePn. me
scab--commi t tr.eti wi i 1 be thu base c work grou-ds with the
overall t_nmmitUi!e inue -iny fur purpr),,;v- of ::ciordtnaLiarr
arrrl for.us.
issut*--i for the Sub-Commi ttewg:
`:err r:t1_i �)rrr�rrl ryg L i c
1 . Wh0t should Le:• i he .c_;+1 @' !01"1 t rrY ir.: at the
dt-avralopment r)f th+- garden pot kiurr o! u1ni pi-wk?
141r at. +ups F.IrEW1 1 1 r-e-W!'�
What. i 2 nr_•ryde d •,li -i•>n ol.htar upper tun) t i er
..ivui l cAbI & I n the ar .,:i
What: sh-cr!21!1 he the a>:tant of dPvelUpm(ent rr
per (i im of t hr 1.•�sr k
What 1 indti of ecri:• +t : r-)ual Iorr,rlr immi nkl -and I
Spec.i .:tl r,er vi ces shuul d be r.rf i f•r C.-ri r r) .1
users to ttra Park"'
4. What cap4kcity of public 4l:5£a t:t,oi+fd be jnt-lr
and built for"
What 1! ind of acc es.s tv the l;arden i ntaeded, I.e.
eAut+._,, bus, btf,r:, hoot
Restoration anti-Preseratat ion
1. What historical interest and significance do the
various structures hold? the gazebo, the pump
hnLULP, carriage 110u5U, fi.y Ford's house, the barn,
the watertower?
Whi r_h buildings (if any) shoul d be restored,
managed, and interpreted as historically
significant.
3. What kinds of historical interpretation should be
offered to attract users to the park.
pave l oPT_F2_ t _
1. What potential funding sources exist for
development and operation of the Park.
The Noerenberg fund
Grants
County ta:: fundeL
Public fund raising
Fees and charge��
Other
Z. Which sm-irces seem mu=_t viable and to what e>-tent
can funding be anticipated - both short term fer
development and 1eriki tet-m for operations''
Li tconmp
Hennepin County Park Reserve District
Noerenberg Memorial County Park
Advisory Committee
Work Plan
Meet i nc Nt.rmUer Date ODJ[C7' VE
1 Oct 17 1 . Int.roducti on of Members and review of the
Committee's charge aii adopted by the Hennepin
County Park Res rvH District Board of
Commissioner_.
2. To tour uxt Pai k and gai n f i. rF t hared
knowledge of the e-tent and character of land
involved, condition of ex istinc) building,
past operating practices, etc.
To review the legal conditions established
in Mrs. Hoppe'!-, will under which the District
must operate and develop tl•et- ri,rk.
Nov. 1. To review the ether Floral di .-play areas
in the Metropolitan area for perspective in
arriving at an appropriate character anti
theme For the Park. (Arboretum, Como
Conservatory, Rose Garden)
2 2.To review the Master Plan prHpared in 1910,
copy to al•1 members.
The Model, Di stuns f_rr ono's objection
3.1-o identify and discuss issues and make
assignments to the �• sub -Committees.
Sub -Committee Mr?etings dealing with the issues as
Nov -Jan
Feb. 1 . To hear {progress r c:pur is
Sub --Committee Chairperson.
2. To discuss and rasolve any
differences of opinion.
Sub -Committee meetings to develop final reconmend,-tiuns.
Feb -April
4 1'Inyl .In finalize the pl +r for Rec.r&aIiurt
r'uta is use, Restoration r-And Rrere,��vt t:i
+., Development.
Or t oU r- ) a, 1 `i 0 4
NVI LL
CF
LORA N. IIOPPE
1, LORA N. IiOPPE, whose full name is Lora Noerenberg Hoppe,
of Hennepin Comity, Minnesota, make and declare this my will, and 1 revoke
all wills and codicils made by me prior to the date of this will.
ARTICLE ONE
I direct my executors, hereinafter teamed, to pay all of my
funeral expenses, expenses of last illness, claims allowed in the adminis-
tration of my estate, federal and state income and gift taxes owed by me at
the time of my death, expenses of the administration of my estate and all
death taxes of any character (including interest and penalties) imposed by
reason of my death with respect to any property treated as a part of my
taxable estate for purposes of any such tax. My executors shall not
recover any portion of any such taxes from the recipient of any part of the
property constituting; my taxable estate whether disposed of by this will o
not.
ARTICLE TWO
I give the following legacies to those of the following persons
who survive me:
A. To my sister-in-law, CLARA SMITI-f (Mrs. Archie K. Smith)
�J now living in Willmar, h.innesota, if she survives me, the
-J1 sum of Five Thousand Dollars ($5, 000. 00).
B. To GUS-1AV DELCOGRT, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, if he
survives me, one thousand (1, 000) shares of G, aia Belt
Breweries, Inc. capital stock.
r
J C. To A1 T11UR IIARTLUT, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, if he
survive.i me, one thousand (1, 000) shares of Grain Belt
Breweries, Inc. capital stock. If lie does not survi-.•e me,
thun I give said shares to his wife, FLORA 11ARTERT, if
she �;urvives me.
D. To the UIMVEI:S1TY OF I\W:NI:SU'IA, for riuseum purposes, .111
sp.!cimens of moose, clucks and other birds nov. contained in my
home on Crystal Bay, Lake Miiuietonka.
E. To n%TJIUR IU\RTER'T, F1,011A III RTE'11T, and EVELYN S' ANI II:S,
jointly and absolutely, or to the survivors or survivor of them, all
of my furniture and household goods, personal effects and ornaments,
excluding therefrom, however, those small remembrance items
disposed of by a list left with my attorney, Henry W. Haverstock.
F. To RAY FORDS, if he survives me, any and all automobiles and all
tools, machinery and contents of the outbuildings on my horziestead
properlyngn Crystal Bay and Maxwell Bay, Lake Minnetonka, abso-
lutely,/one thousand (1, 000) shares of Grain Belt Breweries, Inc.
capital stock.
G. To ELVERA ERICKSON, of Mound, Minnesota, five hundred (500)
shares of Grain Belt Breweries, Inc. capital stock if she is in my
employ ut the time of my death.
H. Except to the extent, if any, that I have made gifts or suggested
gifts under this Article and under ARTICLE THREE to relatives,
I have r t made and do not make any provision for any other gifts
to them.
ARTICLE THREE
I have left with my attorney, I3ENI:Y %V. HAVERSTOCK, a memorandum
dated April 8, 1968, containing directions as to disposition of certain items,
and I direct my executors to carry out my wishes as expressed in that merno-
randurn, except only that the gift to MARGARET DELCOURT shall be
stricken therefrom, and I have added a gift to CLARENCE STELLMACIIER
to said memorandum.
ARTICLE FOUF.
A. I give, devise and bequeath all of lny real estate in Section 9,
Township 117, Range 23, llennepin Count),, Minnesota, North of the center
line of County Road No. 51, at ._ke Minnetonka, subject to a life estate in
C— favor of PAY FORDE in two and sixty one hundredths (2. GO) acres thereof
C• described as follows:
Commencing at the intersection of the center line of County Road
C Ho. 51 with the center line of French load, so-called; thence
Wcsterly aloe,; -;,kid County Road to thr %Vcst line of Lot Four (4);
thence North to the 1%.Iorthlvest corner of said Lot Four (4); thence
h:a,,;t on thg- liar Of •;nid I.ot I'ou _(4) to the rr► ti - t -C rill
French Road, so-called; thence Southerly along said French Roa "
to beginning, Section J, Tovmship 117, Range 23, Hennepin Count),
Minnesota.
whereon is situated the dwelling house in which said RAY FORDE now lives,
to AnTNNESOTA CHAPTER of THE NATURE CONSERVANCY, INC., a
cr corporation, with the request that the same be operated and
managed in its approximate natural state as a place whereon wild fowl and
other wild frame will be allowed to congregate on this land as a natural
area.
It is my hope and expectation that the MINNESOTA CHAPTER
of THE 'NATURE CONSERVANCY, INC, shall maintain and operate this
property on an admissions basis or by other proper and suitable method, if
compatible with the stated use, whereby sufficient revenue will be obtained
for the conduct of a frame refuge area.
If the devise and bequest under this Paragraph A of ARTICLE
FOUR set forth above to MINNESOTA CHAPTER of THE NATURE
CONSERVANCY, INC., a cha-itable corporation, is not acceptable to it,
then I give, devise and bcque�ath said property to HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK
RESERVE DISTRICT upon the same terms and conditions as set forth herein -
above. If the devise and bequest to IIENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE
DISTRICT is not acceptable to it, then I direct my executors to cause a
charitable corporation to be organized, with a perpetual charter, to receive
�J
the devise and bcclucst uncicr thli, Paragraph A of-MtTICLE FOUR, upon the
same terms and for the same puL poses a5 set forth hercinabc•:e, said
r-�
n corporation to be known as "LNOERENBERCG NATURE AREA, INCORPORATED "
or other suitable name incorporating the words "\OERENBERG NATURE
J
AREA," and such corporation shall be authorized by its articles and by-laws
to receive said devise and bcclucst and adininister the same as a nature area
in the same gencral manner as provided above in this Para;;ra ph A of
/1UTICLE FOUR, for the use of the public under such rules and rcc;ul<<tiuns
as said charitable corporation shall prescribe, for public purposes.
B. I give, devise and bequeath all the residua of my personal
property and all of my real estate in Section 9, Township 117, Ranee 23,
Ilennepin Cotinty, Minnesota, South of the center line of County Road
No. 51 and located adjacent to and along Crystal Bay, La'.e Minnetonka,
to HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE DiSTYUCT, ab,,olutely, as a
special gift and bequest to be known as "Noerenberg Memorial County Park
Gift, " for the purpose of establishing a memorial park in memory of my
fathe - 'Frederick C. Noerenberg, and my mother, Johanna Noerenberg, to
be known as "Noerenberg Memorial County Park, " pursue nt to the provisions
of Chapter 512 of the Laws of Minnesota for the year 1961 and other applicable
laws of the State of Minnesota covering the establishment of public parks.
Said land shall be operated and devoted to public park purposes as an arboretum
for flowers, shrubs and trees, with suitable pathvrays and decorative features.
I direct that the said HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE DISTRICT, In
utiLizinti this Crystal Bay area for general display garden purposes, use the
earnings of the funds which are given herein to the District for tine purpose
of maintenance of that area. This indication as to use shall not imply: and•
�1 authority what.-oever in the District to use the land for �picnic purposes, for
damping, for boat or water craft launching, or for- any uses incompatible
J with that of a general display garden area.
I request that RAY FORDE, if living; at the time of my death,
r`
/ be eniployed as superintendent of this garden area on Crystal Bay.
n
1 request that the HENNEPIN CC NTY PARK RESERVE
DISTRICT plant evergreens and other suitable shruhs indigenous to our
climate in that area of titer property described ttrtder this Paragraph 13 of
A1l'1'IC L.: 1'OUI1 which is South of County Ilighwa) 1 and' ast of the
present dwelling house and extendini; Last from the house as far as the
line of the Webster proper•ty on the East of this land. It is my hok)e that
the District will thereby improve and beautify the area for the purposes
above stated.
I direct that my e: .,,ors shall have the dwelling house
on said land demolished as soon after my death as possible, and have
erected on the site where the dwelling stood a suitable arbor of modest
design, wherein or whereon a plaque shall be placed which shall be
engraved with the following sentiment: "Noerenberg Memorial County
Park Is"Dedicated to the Use of the Public in &lemory of the
Frederick and Johanna Noerenberg Family Who Once Lived Here. "
If the devise and bequest as set forth under this Paragraph B
of ARTICLE FOUR is not acceptable to said HE -NINEPIN COUNTY PARK
RESERVE DIS i RICT, then I direct that my executors shall cause a
charitable corporation to be organized with a perpetual charter, to receive
this devise and bequest. Such corporation shall be named "NOLRENBERG
MEIIOILI L PARK, INCORI"ORATED, " or a suitable name incorporating
the words "NOERENBERG MEMORIAL PARK-, " and shall be authorized by
its articles of,incorporation and by-laws to receive said residue of my
�) estate, real and personal, and administer the same for public park and
1 recreational purposes in tn he same general manner as set forth under this
1
Paragraph B, all to the end that the public steal: be entitled to use said land
freely for the purpose,; indicated. 'l_hove.
ARTICLE FIVE
�`- I nominate Alt.'I'IIUI: IIART R'r and IIE�R`1 W. IIAVE'USTOCK
V
as executors of this my will. I request that none of my executors be
regmred to fm n ,h bond as executor ►n excess of thcr sum of '1'wetlty-f►ve
f'.
Thousand Dollars ($2b, 000. 00). If either of the persons named as executor
be deceased or be unable for other reason to serve as an executor, then the
remaining executor shall act as sole executor, subject to the qualification
that if said HENRY W. HAVERSTOCIC be unable to serve, then
LARRY R. IiENNEIVIAN, in the first instance, or some other member of
the firm of Cant, Haverstock, Gray, Plant & Mooty shall be appointed as
executor in place and instead of said HENRY W. HAVERS'rOCK.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have on this day of March,
1970, hereunto set my hand and seal.
The foregoing instrument, consisting of six (6) pages of typewritten
,vim
matter, was on this day of March, 1970, signed at the end thereof and
on the margin of the first five (5) pages of typewriting by the above named
LOR.A N. IIOPPE, in the presence of us and each of us, and the same was 1..
her declared and published as her will in the presence of us and each of %:.:.
and at her request and in her presence and in the presence of each other �•:
have
this day hereunto subscribed our names as attesting witnesses thereto.
V'irZ1. (•�..� G. �1.lLt I' �C� � Residing at tLC.c:a'6q i���L
Residing at
l�iu-�. � ,' 11.•-sue �,(-rc�G Residing at
AGENDA: NOERtNBERG MEMORIAL COUNTY PARK ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING
November 1, 1984, 4:00 p.m., Freshwater Biological Institute
1. Review 1978 Master Plan
Narrative
Maps
Mudel
2. Disucss the provisions of the Will
3. Review Inventory of other Floral Display Gardens in the Metro area
4. Discussion regarding Orono's concerns about Noerenberg Memorial County Park
• zoning
• background information
5. General discussion
6. Next meeting time
') INVENTORY OF FLORAL DISPLAY GARDENS IN THE N
Garden/ Owner Yr. Est. Size Theme Fees Annual Use
U.M. Arboretum 1958 675 acres Series $2/ind. Ind. and group tours; walks and bus
(their bus), 1 reg weekly tour (unr
Como Conservatory
St. Paul 1915 no theme 50t A/25cC
open, except ind./ mostly groups
for fall and gL'ided tours with vo'ilinteers, but n
spring show when more volunteers
theme may be charge was begun 3 years ago to
evident help pay fuel costs in winter
Normandale Comm. informal, ind, and group
College 1976 2 ac. authentic use from babies to senior citizens;
Japanese free used for marriage ceremonies too
Arneson Acres/ 1981 15-20 ac formal garden limited; not highly promoted
7-dina Arboretum: is 1 acre free
C I ty of Edina ?Ww,,MAla,Q,rS
Xpls. Rose Garden/ 2ia,:. annua' and free Rose garden is part of Lyndale Park
Lyndale Park 1907 rock garden used by individuals; no guided tour
Mpls. Pk. Bd
free
Eloise Butler/
Mpls. Park Bd. 1906 20 ac. wildflower and bird sanctuary strictly a preserve; no
ann/per, began handout given for individual
rebuilding
fall '83
Mpls. Armory
Gardens 1913 discontinued in '60's; will be replaced during t'-- ire::
conservatory and pere
INVENTO" jr FLORAL DISPLAY GARDENS IN THE METRO AREA
Garden Owne_ Yr. Est. Size Theme Fees Annual Use Comments Contact Person
U.M. Arboretum 1958 675 acres Series $2/ind. Ind. and group tours; walks and bus show how annuals, )erennials, etc. Mike Heger
(their bus), 1 reg weekly tour (unresv) can be used in personal gardens 443-2460
educational , 100,000 annual visitors
Como Conservat,-ry
St. Paul 1915 no theme 50t A/25GC
open, except ind./ mostly groups
for fall and guided tours with volunteers, but need
spring show when more volunteers
theme may be charge was begun 3 years ago to
evident help pay fuel costs in winter
Normandale Comm. informal, ind. and group
College 1976 2 ac. authentic use from babies to senior citizens;
Japanese free used for marriage ceremonies too
:rneson Acres/ 1981 15-20 ac formal garden limited; not highly promoted
Edina Arboretum: is 1 acre free
City of Edina fLK&A^iA Flo, S
Npls. Rose Garden/ 2}ac.
Lyndale Park 1�07
Mpls. Pk. Bd
Eloise Butler/
Mpls. Park Bd. 1906 20 ac.
ann/per. began
rebuilding
fall '83
Mpls. Armory
Gardens 1913
traditional - palm dome in center Les Day
economic house in one wing 489-0868
ferns; perennials, annuals
Japanese landscape architect did planning
land given by college and developed by Joann Rice
a grant from Sears Roebuck; Normandale 830-9306
maintains grounds;use of volunteers
Edina Garden Council plants flowers in Rick Jacobson
greenhouse and transplants to park.
Gift from Morten Arneson; 9 garden
clubs with over 150 members
annual and free Rose garden is part of Lyndaie Park; formal layout; annuals and perennials; Mary Lerman
rock garden used by individuals; no guide ours rebuilding rock garden to resemble 348-4448
English garden; handout given for tours
free
wildflower and bird sanctuary strictly a preserve; no formal gardens
handout given for individual Mary Lerman
discontinued in '60's; will be replaced during the next 2 years with sculpture garden/ Mary Lerman
conservatory and perennial display
Hennepin County Park Reserve District
3800 County Road 24 • Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359 • Telephone 612.473-4693
PARK RESERVES
BAKER
CARVER
CROW HASSAN
ELM CREEK
HYLAND LAKE
TO: Noerenberg Advisory Con.mi ttee
LAKE REBECCA
MURPHY HANREHAN
FROM: Marty Jessen
REGIONAL PARKS
SUBJECT: November 29 fleet g
BRYANILAKE
CLEARY LAKE
DATE: November 14, 1984
CLIFTON E FRENCH
COON RAPIDS DAM
EAGLE LAKE
FISH LAKE
JAMES W WILKIE
LAKE SARAH
Just a reminder that our next meeting is scheduled
SPRING LAKE
for Thursday, November 29. This will again be held
SPECIAL USE AREAS
at the Gray Freshwater Biological Institute at 4:00 p.m.
ARTHUR E ALLEN WILDLIFE
The agenda for the meeting includes the fol l owi nQ items:
SANCIUARV
BAKER PARK GOLF COURSE
1. Report and discussion on the Arboretum
CLEARY LAKE GOLF COURSE
HYLAND HILLS SKI AREA
2. Interpretation of the will
NOERENBERG MEMORIAL PARK
WAWATASSO ISLAND
3. Discussion of themes for the garden
WILD GOOSE CHASE ISLAND
TRAIL CORRIDORS
NORTH HENNEPIN TRAIL If you are unable to attend, please let me know.
BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS
DAVID LATVAAHO
CHAIR
GOLDEN VALLEY
WILLIAM H. BOYNTON
VICE CHAIR I
ST LOUIS PARK i
JUDITH S. ANDERSON
BLOOMINGTON
1
PATRICIA D. BAKER
MINNFAPOL IS
SHIRLEY A. SONINE
MAPLE PLAIN
WILLIAM 1 HOLBROOK
MINNEAPOLIS
SCOTT L. HEIMAN
MINNEAPOLIS
VEIIN J. HARTSNBURO
SUPERINTENDENT •
SECRETARY TO THE BOARD I
I
NOLRE=NBLRG MEmoraAL COUNTY PAR
ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING
NOVEMBER 1, 19E 4
q:ire F.M.
Prc-sent: Richard Grz;.y. Chairman
Mrs. Henry Doerr
Mrs. James fish
Mickey Goldman
JoEllen Hurr
Bob Kojetin
Absent: Glen Ray
Georges Rector
}"+arb Peterson
J. Diann Goetten
Michael. Heger
Barbara Kaerwer
Bob Murgaras
Toni. Riley
Hank Serwat
Hennepin County Par-F. Reserve Di s,tri ct Staff Present:
Marty Je ossen
Don King
Judy McDowell
r v' si Uns of, the WL 11
Richard Gray opened the mectiny by reviewing the provisions of the
Will. Gray referred specifically to the provision than indicated
trust fund earnings be cased -for mains:enance pui-po_,es only. Gray
called attention to the weird "mainte,nanCV", .itstinq th,kt: a definition
r,f the t"rm s :» ,teoded in order that t t be determined whet.tic:•r
iievel opment of the par l it-- to be included under t hr i s, definition. Wi th
the committee'�i approval, Gray indicated that he would contact one or
more of the in -olvead lawyers send get their intEi2rpretation and
r.rnderstanding of the term an intended by Mrs. Hoppe. Gray added that
in doing so, the possibility exists that development. would not be
considered a maintenance function and that funds for these purposes
may ha,e to come from outside sources.
Orono Concerns
As spokesperson for the City of Orono, Diann Goetten indicated her
concern Lhah the development of the part. be within the zoning
standard; of the city. Goetten stated that Noerenberg Park is located
in a resident:ial zone o-f the city. Plea,iie refer to separate report
for zoning standard; which apply to this location.
In response to these standards they committee made the following
comments:
Gray stated that these are not unreasonable standards and that As
long as they area c-_ompli.ed with, he felt there should be no
problems with development of the park in this respect.
Barbara Kaerwer referred to a letter addressed to the City Col.rnc i 1
by the Orono Committee for the r-rotection of Ncerenberra Memorial
Fart which requested restrictive par�tng Iim,ted to 23 passenger
vehicles— It was *.!xplained that this was not a standard pr,-.ently
set by tht- c: r t.y , hut- a ► oquest. by a neighborhood! group. r+1 I
men-lrre s. or umj*.i t tv,? will recei v, a =opy of thi s letter..
It was questioned whether the 75 foot setback standards would
affect the rebuilding of the gazebo. Marty Jessen indicated th.Al.
is not a problem since the District had already received approval.
from Orono to go ahead with this propsect.
Goetten proceeded with another concern of Orc:no's, that communication
between the District and the city be continued throughout this
planning effort. (3oetten reviewed the sequence of events which
involved the original advi5.ory committee and which led to Noerenberg
being removed from the 1979 Capital Improvement flan of the District.
In response, Gray ruquested the following:
- that Dick Benson, City Administrator for Orono, receive copies
of minutes from all meetings of this committee;
-- that a joint mr2eting with neighbors and citizens of Orono bu
scheduled before any recommendations are made by the committee.
Floral Dissplav Gardtgns
Jessen distributed a sheaf -Misting various floral display gardens
throughout the Metro area and related information, i.e., year
established, size, theme, fees, annual U,e, additional comments, and
contact person. Jussen noted that the garden with the most similarity
to Noerenberg was the U. cif M. Ar boreteum which was much 1 _urger. The
committees generally agreed that regardless of what occi_rrred at
Noerenberg there would be duplication but that every attempt should be
made not to duplicate direct these other gardens. Themes suggested by
the committee included Victorian and Old Engliih.
Master Flan
With the aid of a motel, Don King reviewed the original master
plan, pointing out various features and spatial elements.
Next Meeting: Thursday, November 29, 4 p.m.
Gray Freshwater Biological Institute
1. Mike Heger will present information on the Arboretum.
2. Interpretation of the Will.
3. Discussion of themes for the Garden.
SEQUENCE OF EVENTS RE.
NOERENSERG MEMORIAL COUNTY PARK
Planning Effort of 1977-1979
1-12-72 Lora Hoppe dies
1 _�-0-2 -7? Hearing on will
1'-3-74 Noerenberg Gardens Advisory Committee is established.
11 --370-77 Committee recommends approval of Master Plan acid sends letter- to
Oronu City Council recommending:
Ma ,ter Plan
Phase I $ 350, )00
Phase II 90o , 000
Total * 1,250,004
-1-' 7 - 7 8 Hennepin County Park Reserve District (HCF'RD) appear before City
Council for conceptual approval -knd zlso indica*es support fur
public- participation efforts.
5---4--78 Neighborhood meeting headed by Allan Raymond involves 20 residents
and C HCPFP people. This is the first time citizens actually saw
Master Plan.
7-1(-.)--78 City Council directs letter to Clifton Frenr!^, Superintendent of
HCPRD, expressing residents' concerns and asking for additional
time to review Master Plan.
8-1-78 Orono committee -For the Protection of Noerenberg Memorial P•arl
,ends letter to Mayor Von Nest staing concerns regarding Master
P1 an;
-inconsistent with terms of the will
-negative environmental impact
--unsound municipal use and planning
....-imprudent use of public funding
9-5--78 Dick Denson, city administrator, sends letter to French, HCFRI),
and tlo Charles Weaver, Chairman, Metro Countil, stating his
concern that Metro Council had awarded $350,060 contract to HCF'RU
for development of Noerenberg park.
9-11-78 Weaver, Metru Council, replies, to above letter stating that a
contract was not awarded and acknowledged (-i!.y's concern with the
gituatI or.
4-26-79 Benson sends letter to Weaver stating concern that contract of
$266,41)U has now been awarded to HCPRD, restates that city has
never- had opportunity to review proposed plan-, And asks for delay.
5-16-79 UenYon sends !setter to French r?s,_atinrj prior c -)rrespondence,
concerns and urges cooperation between city and HCPF41.
i9 Weaver responds to 6cns�on 's letter of 4-26 stating that contract:
of .t266,4()) was awarded and approved 4-127-79. Nei also quesons
city "s approval of Master Plan <3nd again recognizes cot tinu�ng
neeri to involve citizens.
5-29--79 Benson sends letter to French asking for letter it response to
cal.' of 4`; days prior. French had said he :(-)uld col,'__�ct -ities
after I_heir next board meetirg. bei.-,on has herd nothing.
City sendE� letter to Weaver stating the lack of common i cation { r,-j,:i
Fri Bch and that the situation is arousing community concern.
7-24-79 Benson sends l etter to French -,t zti ng hi s under -.+..and.- ray that ICF'RD
has rernovPd the Noerenh�ry project. from 19/9 fundin-i program.
CITY OF ORONO ZONING STANDARDS AS REGARDS NOERENBERG MEMORIAL PARK,
Reported by Diann Goetten, Chair, City of Orono Planning Commission
Noerenberg Memorial Park is located in the LR-lA (One Family Lakeshore
Residential District) district. A public park is a permitted use. The LR-IA
district under the R-1A district is intended to provide a district which will
allow a combination of low density residential development. The proposed land
use may not endanger the quality of storm water run off into Lake Minnetonka.
Because of the location of the district near the lake, special regulations are
necessary to protect those natural resources from the effects of dense devel-
opment.
Within 75' of shoreline, no excavating, filling, hardcover, temporary or
permanent structures are allowed; 75'-250', 25;.' hardcover; 250'-500', 30%;
500' - 1,000', 35" hardcover. (Hardcover is any structure, blacktop or other
material which interferes to any degree with the direct absorption of rainfall
into the ground. Hardcover also includes gravel driveways and plastic bed
coverings w/o holes.
No trees within 75' of the shoreline with a diameter ;If 6" or more can be
removed without obtaining a permit from the City Council.
Preliminary planning would require a complete site plan, adhering to all
standards of the district and showing for example, all setbacks, elevation,
X dry buildable, a wetlands, existing hardcover (buildings, garages, sheds,
roads, walkways, accessory structures, etc.), septic system, well, etc. A
drainage plan would also be included.
The City Council would look into the following needs:
- on site septic system
- need for additional toilet facilities
- traffic patterns
road vision
road entrance/s, exit/s
lighting
- estimate number of visitors
- parking
if parking on north side, safety concern crossing street
- hours of operation
- number of employees
- overall park lighting
- signage
A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) would '.e required for the i lowing:
parking lot/s
earth moving
grading
walls
greenhouse/s
Accessory Uses in the LR-IA district are: garages, fences, gazebo.
A varience to the code would be required for a dock. (A varience is required
because there is no residence located on the property.) It would probably be
best to apply for a ,joint use dock license. Some of the factors to consider are:
how many slips
- policing of area
lighting if any
safety
rip rapping (permit required)
August 1, 1978
Mr. Brad Van Nest
Mayor
City of Orono
P. 0. Box 66
Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323
RE: Development of Noerenberg Memorial Park
Dear Mr. Van Nest:
The following statement briefly summarizes the position of
the signatories regarding the proposal by the Hennepin County
Park Reserve District to develop the Noerenberg Memorial Park.
The signatories basically represent only chose nearby residents
who have become aware of the project.
We oppose the proposed development for the following reasons:
I. Inconsistent with the terms and intent of the Will of
Lora N. Hoppe.
A. Property on the north side of County Road 51 shall
"be operated and managed is its approximate natural
state as a place whereon wild fowl and other wild
game will be allowed to congregate on this land as
a natural area."
Operation and maintenance of this land by either
the Minnesota Chapter of the Nature Conservancy,
Inc., the Hennepin County Park Reserve District,
or if the bequest is unacceptable to either of the
above a charitable corporation as specified in the
will, must be "upon the same terms and for the same
purposes as set forth hereinabove."
B. Property on the south side of County Road 51 "shall
be operated and devoted to public park purposes as
an aboretum for flowers, shrubs and trees, with
suitable pathways and decorative features." Expressly
forbidden are uses of the land "for picnic purposes,
for camping, for boat or water craft launching, or
for any uses incompatible with that of a general
display garden area."
Mr. Brad Van Nest
August 1, 1978
Page 2
The will stipulates "that the Park Reserve District
plant evergreens and other suitable shrubs indigenous
to our climate in that area of the property extending
from the site of the dwelling house east as far as
the line of the Webster property" (now the Raymond
property). "It ;s my hope that the District will
thereby improv- nd beautify the area for the purposes
stated above."
C. Summary
While donation of the land for specified ;public park
purpose: implies the need for public access, the will
clearly -eks to place severe limitations -i he extent
of such access in order to maintain the land north of
County Road 51 in its "approximate natural state" as
a wildlife preserve, and the lard north of County Road 51
as a memorial park to be devotei and operated as an
"arboretum for flowers, shrubs and trees", and fc
"general display garden purposes". The specific
exclusion of uses of the land for picnics, camping„
boat launchings or any other "uses incompatible with
that of a general display garden area" as well as the
specific reference to plantings to be made east of the
dwelling house extending east to the Webster (Raymond)
property line clearly indicates that Mrs. 'loppe in her
will envisioned a modest public access to land that would
be more or less preserved in its natural state, in
harmony with its surroundings, and pleasing to her
.mmediate neighbors.
In the event that her intent for the land to be left
more or less in its natural state was unacceptable to
the Park-Ae"emote District, Mrs. Hoppe provided in her
will tha'f' 6%o•vexecutors shall. cause a charitable
-orperation to be organized for the same stated purposes.
II. Ne ative Environmental Impact
It has not been demonstrated to the residents that the
environmental impact of the project will not be adverse
in terms of its effects on wildlife, land and water as
well as the health, safety and welfare of the surrounding
residents with respect to the above as well as the specific
effects on residential property values, of litter, noise
and safety from additional traffic and people in the area,
-.dditional local law enforcement costs, potential future
need of widening, County Road 51, and the aesthetic impact
on the general sense of well being of the residents of the
commsn i t v
Mr. Brad Van Nest
August 1, 1978
Page 3
II1. Unsound Municiple Use and Plannin
A park or recreational development in a residential
community should enhance the value of surrounding
residential property and have a positive impact on the
lifestyle and general well being of the people already
residing in the area. Since the above effects of the
proposed project have not been demonstrated to the
community by the Park Reserve District, proceeding with
the project cannot be consistent with the responsibilities
of the Orono City Council and Planning Commission for the
sound use and planning of land within the municiple system
it serves.
IV. Imprudent Use of Public Funds
We find the proposed expenditure of approximately
$1,250,000 of public funds for this particular project
inconsistent with the realities and priorities of life
in Minnesota today. We reach the same conclusion regarding
the scope of the proposed five year Regional Park System
capital improvement program of $139.000,000. It will be
our intent to make our feelings well known to the 1979
legislature should such a recommendation be Trade.
With no intention of being all inclusive, and consistent with
the points raised above, we specifically seek to limit the
development and use of the land in the following manner:
1) That parking be forever restricted to 25 passenger vehicles
and no buses at one time, and that development of a parking
��ys}nas�let area not exceed what is practical for 25 passenger vehicles.
2) That no entrance for public access be allowed within 150
yards of any private property line, no parking be allowed
south of County Road 51, ro parking be allowed within 75
P-ds of County Road 51, and no parking be allowed within
'j yards of Old Crystal Bay road.
3) That no support or visitor facility be constructed south
of County Road 51, within 150 yards of Old Crystal Bay
Road, or within 75 yards of County Road 51.
4) That visitor facilities be limited to washrooms, drinking
fountains, and telephones.
Mr. Brad Van Nest
August: 1, 1978
Page 4
S) That access to the park be denied to the public between
Novembe_ 1st and April 30th, and before 10:00 a.m. and
after 4:00 p.m. from May 1st to October 31st.
6) That adequate enforcement be provided by the Park Reserve
District to insure public compliance to park rules and
regulations.
7) That the park, in addition to the use exclusions specified
in the will, not be used for weddings or similar events.
In summary, the proposed project is unacceptable to us for the
reasons outlined above. We view ourselves as reasonable people
who are concerned with doing what is right in terms of the
betterment of the community at large as well as protection of
our own personal interest, and the interest of the City of Orono.
This project places these Natural concerns in opposition to one
another. It is our hope and belief that the subject can be
disposed of satisfactorily through the public mechanisms which
exist within the City of Orono for the protection of its citizens.
That is where the responsibility is focused. Should that not
ozcur, we are prepared to pursue the matter with every means at
our disposal to a satisfactory conclusion.
The following signatories appoint: Allan Raymond or his designate
from within the group of signatories as spokesman at any event
requiring the signatories to be represented concerning the
Noerenberg Memorial Park Development.
Sincerely,
Orono Committee for the
Protection of the Noerenberg
Memorial Park.
MASTER PLAN FOR
NOERENBERG MEMORIAL COUNTY PARK
GARDEN AND SANCTUARY
BACKGROUND
IN 1972, AT THE BEQUEST OF MS. LAURA HOPPE, THE HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE
DISTRICT ACQUIRED THE NOERENBERG FAMILY ESTATE, NOW CALLED THE NOERENBERG
MEMORIAL COUNTY PARK. THIS SITE IS LOCATED BETWEEN CRYSTAL AND MAXWELL BAYS
OF LAKE MINNETONKA WITHIN THE CITY OF ORONO. IT CONSISTS OF TWO PARCELS,
15.98 ACRES SOUTH OF COUNTY ROAD 51 AND 57.83 ACRES NORTH OF COU11TY ^.OAD 51
FOR A TOTAL OF 73.81 ACRES. THERE IS APPRnXIMATEL'r 6,230 FT. (1.18 MI.) OF
SHORELINE ON MAXWELL MY, 1,200 FT. (.23 MI.) OF SHORELINE ON CRYSTAL BAY AND
1,06u FT. (.20 MI.) OF SHORELINE ON THE CONAJECTING NOERENBERG CHANNEL FOR A
TOTAL OF 6,490 FT. (1.61 MI.) OF SHORELINE ON LAKE MINNETONKA. THIS LAND WAS
GIVEN TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE DISTRICT FOR CERTAIN USES ONLY AS
STATED IN THE WILL.
THE PROPERTY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF COUNTY ROAD 51 HAS BEEN GIVEN "... WITH THE
REQUEST THAT THE SAME BE OPERATED AND MAt4AGED IN ITS APPROXIMATE NATURAL STATE
AS A PLACE WHEREON WILD FOWL AND OTHER WILD GAME WILL BE ALLOWED TO CONGREGATE
ON THIS LAND AS A NATURAL AREA."
Tug PROPERTY SOUTH OF COUNTY ROAD 51 "... SHALL BE OPERATED AND DEVOTED TO
PUBLIC PARK PURPOSES AS AN ARBORETUM FOR FLOWERS, SHRUBS, AND TREES, WITH SUIT-
ABLE PATHWAYS AND DECORATIVE FEATURES. THIS INDICATION AS TO USE SHALL NOT
IMPLY ANY AUTHORITY WHATSOEVER IN THE DISTRICT TO USE THE LAND FOR PICNIC
PURPOSES, FOR CAMPING, FOR BOAT OR WATER CRAFT LAUNCHING, OR FOR ANY USES
INCOMPATIBLE WITH THAT OF A GENERAL DISPLAY GARDEN AREA."
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE WILL, THE AREA NORTH OF COUNTY ROAD 51 WILL
BE DEVELOPED IN A NATURAL STATE AS A WILDLIFE SANCTUARY. FOR THE PURPOSES
OF DISCUSSION IN THIS MASTER PLAN, THIS PART OF THE SITE WILL BE REFERRED
TO AS THE SANCTUARY.
THE AREA SOUTH OF COUNTY ROAD 51 WILL BE DEVELOPED AS A GENERAL DISPLAY GARDEN.
FOR PURPOSES OF DISCUSSION IN THIS MASTER PLAN, THIS PART OF THE SITE WILL BE
REFERRED TO AS THE GARDEN.
AS MENTIONED PREVIOUSLY, THIS SITE WAS FORMERLY THE NOERENBERG FAMILY ESTATE.
INCLUDED WITHIN THIS ESTATE WAS THE LARGE FAMILY HOME, GARAGE, BOATHOUSE/
GA77BO; PUMPHOUSE AND APPROXIMATELY ONE HALF ACRE OF FLOWER GARMS ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF CO. RD. 51; 44D A SEPARATE RESIDENCE, BARN, MISCELLANEOUS
OUTBUILDINGS, WATERTOWER, AND A SMALL GREENHOUSE NORTH OF CO. RD. 51.
A PROVISION OF THE WILL REQUIRED THAT THE FAMILY HOUSE BE TORN DOWN AS SOON
AS POSSIBLE AND A MEMORIAL ARBOR BE ERECTED ON THE HOUSE SITE. THE RESIDENCE
ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ROAD WAS GIVEN AS A LIFE ESTATE IN FAVOR OF
MR. PAY FORD, LONG, TIME CARETAKER FOR THE NOERENBERG FAMILY.
PLANNING PROCESS AND OBJECTIVES
PRIOR TO PREPARATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAIN FOR THIS SITE, A CITIZENS'
ADVISORY COMMITTEE WAS ESTABLISHED IN LATE 1974. THE GENERAL PURPOSE OF
THIS COMMITTEE WAS TO AID THE PARK RESERVE DISTRICT IN DEVELOPING THE PLAN)
FOR THE SITE. MEMBERSHIP IN THIS COMMITTEE OF TWELVE PEOPLE CONSISTS OF
REPRESENTATION BY INTERESTED CITIZENS LIVING NEAR THE SITE, SEVERAL GARDEN
CLUBS, THE (PJiVERSITY OF MINNESOTA'S LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM AND THE CITY OF
ORONO.
THE COtMITTEE COLLECTED INPUT REGARDING DESIRED GARDEN ELEMENTS FROM THE
GENERAL PUBLIC AND REVIEWED THE PLANS AS THEY WERE FORMULATED BY THE PARK
RESERVE DISTRICT STAFF.
A QUESTIONNAIRE WAS DEVELOPED BY THE COMMITTEE AND DISTRIBUTED TO GARDEN)
CLUBS, SERVICE CLUBS, AND PROFESSIONAL INTEREST GROUPS IN MINNEAPOLIS/
HENNEPIN COUNTY AREA. INFORMATION FROM THE QUESTIONNAIRES WAS COLLECTED
AND SUMMARIZED IN JUNE OF 1975. THIS INFORMATION FORMED THE BASIS FOR A
PRELIMINARY DRAFT PROGRAM WHICH WAS UTILIZED IN FORMULATING THE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN PERIODICALLY REVIEWED BY THE COMMITTEE.
GIVEN THE DIRECTION OF THE WILL, INPUT FROM THE CITIZENS' ADVISORY COMMITTEE
AND HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE DISTRICT STAFF INVESTIGATIONS SUGGEST THAT
THE GARDEN BE DEVELCPED AS A GENERAL PUBLIC DISPLAY GARDEN RATHER THAN ANJ
ARBORETUM OR BOTANICAL GARDEN. SUCH A FACILITY WILL NOT DUPLICATE ANY
OTHERS IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA AND WILL PROVIDE A GARDEN ELEMENT NOW LACKING
IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA. THE NOERENBERG GARDEN WILL BE UNIQUE IN THE
METROPOLITAN AREA; PERHAPS IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
TO BETTER LtIDERSTA Z THE CC44CEPT OF A DISPLAY GARDEN, IT IS NECESSARY TO
DEFINE AND COMPARE AN ARBORETUM, BOTANICAL GARDEN AND DISPLAY GARDEN.
AN ARBORETUM OR BOTANICAL GARDEN I5 AN AREA SET ASIDE FOR GROWING AND
DISPLAYING DIFFERENT ORNAMENTAL TREES, SHRUBS, VINES AND OTHER PLANTS.
IT DOES N1OT NECESSARILY INCLUDE ALL THE PLANTS WHICH CAN BE GROWN IN A
REGION, NOR DOES IT NECESSARILY INCLUDE FORMAL BEDS OR BORDERS OF "UALS
AND PERENJNIALS. AN ARBORETUM DIFFERS FROM A BOTANICAL GARDEN IN THAT THE
EMPHASIS, IS PLACED ON WOODY PLANTS, WHEREAS IN THE BOTANICAL GARDEN EMPHASIS
IS NOT PLACED ON ANY PARTICULAR GROUP OF PLANTS. BOTH DIFFER FROM A
DISPLAY GARDEN IN THAT A SERIOUS EFFORT IS MADE TO PLANT EXTENSIVE COLLECTIONS
OFMANJY TYPES OF PLANTS NOT ONLY FOR DISPLAY, BUT ALSO FOR CRITICAL EXAMINJATION
AND SCIENTIFIC STUDY.
ARBORETA AND BOTANICAL GARDENS ARE SOMEWHAT SIMILAR AND HAVE A. THEIK GREATEST
FMPHASIS, RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC STUDY. PLANTS ARE ARRANGED BY COLLECTIONS
10 AID THE STUDY OF INDIVIDUAL VARIETIES. LITTLE EMPHASIS IS GIVEN TO
HERBACEOUS DISPLAYS.
A DISPLAY GARDEN, P- -)NITRAST, EMPHASIZES HERBACEOUS FLORAL DISPLAYS. PLANT
MATERIALS ARE NOT ARkANJGED AS COLLECTIONS, BUT ARE PRESENTED I-J DESIGNED
COMPOS I T I Of JS WITH MAfJY TYPES OF PLANTS IN THE SAME COMPOSITION. A DISPLAY
GARDEN ALSO EMPHASIZES APPR,ECIATIONJ OF PLANT MATERIALS AND GARDENING AS
LEISURE ACTIVITY, LViEREAS BOTANICAL GARDENS AND ARBORETA EMPHASIZE STUDY
AND EVALUAT ICfl.
A SYNOPSIS OF OTHER HORTICULTURAL DISPLAY FACILITIES IN THE METROPOLITAN
AREA
THERE ARE SEVERAL FACILITIES WITHIN THE METROPOLITAN AREA WHICH MAY BE
COMPARED TO THE NOERENBERG GARDEN.
1. THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM
THIS FACILITY CLOSELY FITS THE ABOVE DEFINITION OF AN ARBORETUM. ITS
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE IS TO TEST AND DEVELOP ORNAMENTAL PLANTS HARDY TO
MINNESOTA. SEVERAL PLANT VARIETIES NOW MARKETED BY LOCAL NURSERIES
WERE DEVELOPED AT THE ARBORETUM. PROVIDING OUTDOOR RECREATIONAL OPPOR-
TUNITIES IS AN IMPORTANT BUT SECONDARY FUNCTION OF THE ARBORETUM; AND
CONSISTS PRINCIPALLY OF VIEWING VARIOUS COLLECTIONS, PARTICULARLY
WHEN THEY ARE IN BLOOM.
2. LAKE HARRIET ROSE GARDEN
THIS IS CONSIDERED A DISPLAY GARDEN, BUT MUCH MORE SPECIALIZED THAN THE
NOERENBERG GARDEN WILL BE. THE PRIMARY EMPHASIS (AS THE NAME IMPLIES)
IS THE DISPLAY OF VARIOUS ROSES. SEVERAL SMALL BEDS OF OTHER FLOWERS
ARE INCLUDED, BUT THESE ARE SECONDARY IN SIGNIFICANCE TO THE ROSES.
ELOISE BUTLER WILDFLOWER GARDEN
WHILE THIS FACILITY IS CALLED A GARDEN, IT IS PRIG^ARILY AN ENRICHED
WOODS WITH TRAILS. THOUGH IT IS NATURAL LOOKING, WILDFLOWERS ARE IN-
TENSELY PLANTED THROUGHOUT. THE EMPHASIS IS ON WILDFLOWERS AS INDIVIDUAL
ITEMS OF INTEREST. THIS AREA IS SIMILAR TO THE PROPOSED NOERENBERG
SANCTUARY, ALTHOUGH NOERENBERG IS LARGER AND EMCOMPASSES A GREATER
VARIETY OF PLANT COMMUNITY TYPES.
4. COMO PARK CONSERVATORY
THE CONSERVATORY IS PRIMARILY AN INDOOR DISPLAY OF TROPICAL PLANTS.
SEASONAL SHOWS OF CERTAIN FLOWERING PLANTS SUCH AS CHRYSANTHEMUM ARE
ALSO FEATURED.
�. NORTHRUP KING TEST GARDEN (COMMERCIALLY OWNED)
THIS AREA IN EDEN PRAIRIE IS OPERATED BY THE NORTHRUP KING SEED COMPANY
TO TEST VARIOUS SEEDS THE COMPANY PRODUCES. WHILE THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC
FACILITY, THE PUBLIC IS PERMITTED TO VIEW THE AREA; BUT, CLEARLY, THE
PURPOSE IS RESEARCH AIJD TESTIt:G.
WHILE NUt1BERS OF VISITORS TO THESE FACILITIES ARE NOT AVAILABLE, OBSER-
VATICX;S OF THE PUBLIC AREAS INDICATE A HIGH LEVEL OF USE. THE NORTHRUP
KING TEST GARDEN PROBABLY RECEIVES LESS BECAUSE IT IS NOT PUB'_ICIZED.
UNIQUENESS WITHIN T f METROPOLITMJ AREA
THE ABOVE FACILITIES WITHIN THE METROPOLITAN AREA SHOULD NOT BE DUPLICATED
AT 7HE NOERENBERG SITE.
THERE ARE CURRENTLY IJO GENERAL PUBLIC DISPLAY GARDENS IN THE METROPOLITAN
AREA. THEREFORE, A GARDEN SUCH AS THIS IS CLEARLY IN THE SPECIALIZED
CLASSIFICATION OF ZOOS, CONSERVATORIES AND PLANETARIUMS, IN THAT ONE OF EACH
IS USUALLY CONSIDERED) SLFFIC1ENT FOR A METROPOLITAN4 AREA.
THIS FACILITY WILL BE LT41QUE NOT ONLY TO THE !METROPOLITAN AREA BUT ALSO
TO THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. THE NEAREST SIMILAR FACILITY 15 THE DISPLAY
GARDEN WITHIN THE BOERNER BOTANICAL GARDEN IN MILWUAKEE, WISCONSIN WHICH
IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 12 MILES SOUTK%EST OF DOWNTOWN MILWAUKEE Al -JD DRAWS
OVER 1,000,000 VISITORS PER YEAR.
THE METROPOLITAN AREA LACKS A PUBLIC DISPLAY GARDEN AND THE DEMAND APPEARS
TO BE SUFFICIENT TO WARRANT HAVING ONE. THE QUESTION IS THEN RAISED WHETHER
THE NOERENBERG SITE IS CONDUCIVE TO SATISFYING THE DISPLAY GARDEN NEED.
SEVERAL FACTORS INDICATE THAT IT IS.
1. ACQUISITION OF LAND
THE 73.31 ACRES WITH 1.61 MILES OF SHORELINE ON LAKE MINNETONKA WERE
GIVEN FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING A DISPLAY GARDEN AND SANCTUARY.
IN ADDITION TO THE LAND, STOCK CERTIFICATES WERE GIVEN WHICH PROVIDE
INTEREST INCOMEE THAT WILL BE USED TO HELP DEFRAY OPERATING EXPENSES.
2. HERITAGE OF THE SITE
THE SITE WAS A PRIVATE ESTATE WITH A SIGNIFICANT PRIVATE GARDEN. IT IS
APPROPRIATE TO DEVELOP A GARDEN AT LEAST AS ATTRACTIVE AS THAT WHICH
ONCE EXISTED THERE. THIS SITE IS ALSO LOCATED WITHIN THE ESTATE AREA
OF THE LAKE MINNETONKA REGION WHICH MAKES THE DEVELCPt�'ENT AS A GARDEN A
VERY COMPATIBLE LAND USE.
A NUMBER OF GARDE14S OF THIS TYPE THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY ARE LUCATED ON
FORMER ESTATES WHICH WERE BEQUEATHED TO THE PUBLIC.
PHYSICAL SETTING
THE SITE IS LOCATED ON LAKE MINNETONKA, THE LARGEST LAKE IN THE METRO-
POLITAN AREA AND IS CURRENTLY THE LARGEST SINGLE PUBLIC LAKESHORE
OWNERSHIP ON THE LAKE. THE COMBINATION OF LAKE ORIENTATION AND SITE
CHARACTER MAKES THIS AN EXTREMELY ATTRACTIVE SETTING FOR A DISPLAY
GARDEI J .
P,ELATIOtISHIP OF SITE TO LOCAL COtAtlUNITY APJD METROPOLITAN AREA
THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF ORONO WHICH IS WITHIN THE DEVELOPING
RIW QF SUBURBS IN THE40UTHWEST MINNEAPOLIS PLANNING SECTOM !i * *E METRO- -
POLITAN COU14CIL. THE URBA14 SERVICE AREA AS SHOWN ON THE DEVELbPMENT FRAMEWORK
PLA14 OF THE t-ETROPOLITAN COLflCIL INCLUDES MOST OF THE CITY OF ORONO. THE
SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE CITY AROUIJD LAKE MINNETONKA IS INCLUDED IN THF
URBAN SERVICE AREA. THE NOERENBERG SITE IS WITHIN THIS CATEGORY.
THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLA!4 (AUGUST 1974) IDENTIFIES AND RECOGNIZES
THE IOERENBERG MEMORIAL COUNTY PARE: AS EXISTING WITHIN THE COV"ITY'S
DEVELOPMENT.
TRAVEL TO THE SITE FROM OTHER PARTS OF THE METROPOLITAN AREA IS BY PRIVATE
AUTO AND PUBLIC BUS TRANSPORTATION.
THE SITE IS LOCATED 15 141LES FROM DO►-91TOWtJ PIINNEAPOLIS VIA U.S.
HIGHWAY 12, COUNTY ROADS 15 AND 51.
SCHEDULED BUS SERVICE OCCURS BETWEEN DOWNTOWN MItJ'IEAPOLIS AND THE
SITE BY WAY OF ROUTE 51, MOUND - WAYZATA. THIS BUS SERVICE DIRECTLY
TIES THE NOERENBERG SITE TO DOWNTOWN MINt4EAPOLIS. THE BUS FARE FROM
DOWNTOWN MINNEAPOLIS TO THE NOERENBERG SITE IS CURRENTLY FIFTY CENTS
(ZONE 1 TO ZONE 3).
WITH THIS RELATIONSHIP TO THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM, THE SITE IS REASOr�ABLY
ACCESSIBLE TO ALL SEGMENTS OF THE METROPOLITAN AREA POPULATION.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS
TO UNDERSTAND THE SITE AND THE SPECIFIC ELEMENTS OF THE CONCEPT, AN INVEN-
TORY Ai:D ANALYSIS OF THE SITE WAS COMPLETED. SITE STUDIES INCLUDED THE
FOLLOWING AND CORRESPONDING TO THE ATTACHED MAPS AND/OR PLATES:
EXISTING CULTURAL FEATURES
EXISTING DEVELOPED FEATURES WITHIN THE SITE SUCH AS ROADS, BUILDINGS,
UTILITIES, ETC. WERE IDENTIFIED. UTILITIES WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY
OF COUNTY ROAD 51 ARE ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE AND SANITARY SEWER.
2. TOPOGRAPHY
DEGREES OF SLOPE GRADIENT FROM 0% - 5%, 5% - 10% AND SLOPES GREATER
THAN 10% WERE IDENTIFIED, BASED ON A CONTOUR INTERVAL OF TWO FEET.
SLOPES OF 00 - 5% ARE CONSIDERED TO HAVE SLIGHT LIMITATIONS FOR DEVELOP-
MENT OF STRUCTURES AND OTHER PUBLIC USE FACILITIES; 50- - 10% HAVE
MODERATE LIMITATIONS; AND SLOPES GREATER THAN 10% ARE CONSIDERED TO
HAVE HIGH EROSION POTENTIAL AND ARE CONSIDERED AS UVDEVELOPABLE. THE
MOST PRONOUNCED TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES ON THE SITE ARE THE HILL IN THE
CENTRAL PART OF THE GARDEN, THE HILL OVERLOOKING THE LAKE IN THE EAST
PART OF THE GARDEIJ, AND THE PENNINSULA EXTENDING INTO THE LAKE IN THE
SAIJCTUARY .
SO I LS
VARIOUS SOILS WITHIN THE SITE WFRE IDENTIFIED ANC CLASSIFIED ACCORDING
TO THEIR RELATIVE SUITABILITY FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SUPPORT FACILITIES
SUCH AS ROADS, PARKING AND BUILDINGS.
4. EXISTING VEGETATION PATTERNS
OVERSTORY VEGETATION WITHIN THE SITE WAS CATALOGED. TWO HUNDRED AND
TWENTY DECIDUOUS TREES OF 17 SPECIES, AND 145 CONIFEROUS TREES OF 9
SPECIES WERE LOCATED WITHIN THE 16 ACRE GARDEN SITE. THE MOST ABUNDANT
DECIDUOUS TREE IS AMERICAN ELM (52), AND CONIFER IS SCOTCH PltJE (48).
ELM REPRESENTS ONLY 24% OF THE DECIDUOUS TREES AND 14% OVERALL. THIS
M£AIJS THAT THE GARDEN'S EXISTING CHARACTER CAN BE MAINTAINED AND WILL
NOT BE DESTROYED AS TREES ARE LOST TO DUTCH ELM DISEASE.
5
6.
7.
a.
SUN AND SHADE PATTERNS
THE RELATIVE DURATION OF SUN AND SHADE PATTERNS WITHIN THE SITE WERE
STUDIED BASED UPON A NINE HOUR INTERVAL BETWEEN 9 A.M. AND 6 P.M. O94
THE LONGEST GAY OF THE YEAR ( 21 JUJE )• BECAUSE THE SUCCESS OF
FLOWERING PLANTS IS DEPENDEN'r UPON SUNSHINE, THIS STUDY HELPS TO
IDENTIFY AREAS THAT ARE CONDUCIVE TO VARIOUS GARDEN TYPES AND FEATURES.
NATUP,AL RESOURCES INVENTORY — SOILS
THIS IDENTIFIES AND INTERPRETS SOIL TEXTURE, AVAILABLE MOISTURE CAPACITY,
INTERNAL DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY. THIS DATA. IS THEN UTILIZED IN
DETER]-liIHING THE CAPABILITY OF SOILS FOR SUPPORTING VARIOUS TYPES OF
VEGETATION.
NATURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY — EXISTING PLANT CONtJ NITIES
THE VARIOUS PLANT COt+TJNITIES OR ASSOCIATIONS WHICH EXISTED WITHIN THE
SITE AS OF THE SUMMER OF 197b' WERE MAPPED. THIS INVENTORY PERTAINS
TO THE SANCTUARY PART OF THE SITE. A TOTAL OF 21 INDIVIDUAL PLANT
COM1-*knJ I TY ASSOCIATIONS HAVE BEEN CLASSIFIED FOR ALL PARY. RESERVE DISTRICT
LANDS. THESE 114DI VI DLAL PLANT COt`VlUN I T I ES HAVE BELA GROUPED INTO EIGHT
PLANT COMMUNITY CATEGORIES: MESIC FOREST, MIXED UPLAND FOREST, LOWLAND
FOREST, SAVANNA, UPLAND GRASSLAND, HERBACEOUS WETLANDS, OPEN WATER AND
EXOTIC. AT THE NOERENBERG SITE, 13 OF THE 21 INDIVICUAL PLANT COMMUN—
ITIES HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED TO EXIST REPRESENTING ALL 8 CATEGORIES.
SUCH DIVERSITY OF PLAINT COMMUNITY TYPES IS UNUSUAL CONSIDERING THE
RELATIVE SIZE OF THE SITE, AND OFFERS AN EXCELLENT OPPORTUNITY FOR
MANAGEMENT AS A SANCTUARY WITH A WIDE RANGE OF HABITAT TYPES.
SPATIAL At,ALYS I S
THIS STUDY IDENTIFIES THE GENERAL SPATIAL AND VISUAL QUALITY OCCURRING
WITHIN THE SITE, AND HELPS TO EXPLAIN HOW THESE VISUAL FEATURES ARE
INTERRELATED.
9. C910EPT PLAN
OVERALL SITE CONCEPT: THE TWO PARTS OF THE SITE WILL OPERATE AS ONE
FUNCTIONAL PARE: UNIT. ALTHOUGH THE NORTH PART OF THE SITE WILL BE A
SANCTUARY, .LAD THE SOUTH PART A DISPLAY GARDEN, THE USER PUBLJC-iwll4L, ;
CONSIDER THE T1•101AS CLOSELY` RELATED PARTS OF A SINGLE PARK. 'TMf L
BISECTION OF THE SITE BY COUNTY ROAD 51 ADDS TO THE APPARENT SEPARATION
INTO T1.10 PARK UNITS, AND IT 15 ALONG THIS ROAD THAT THE GREATEST EMPHASIS
ON THE INTEGRATION OF THE T140 PARTS NEEDS TO OCCUR.
ENTRY TO THE ENTIRE PARY, WILL OCCUR AT THE EAST SIDE OF THE SITE. THIS
ARRANGEMENT WILL PHYSICALLY AJD VISUALLY INTEGRATE THE ACCESS AND PARKING
FOR THE SANCTUARY AND GARDFSJ. GARDEN RELATED BACKGROUND PLANTINGS OF
TREES AND SHRUBS WILL CONTINUE ACROSS THE ROAD AROUND THE ENTRY —PARKING
AREA OF THE SANCTUARY. THIS CONTINUITY OF PLANTING AT THE ENTRY WILL
GIVE A. STRONGER IMPRESSION TO THE USER THAT THE SANCTUARY AND GARDEN ARE
IN FACT PARTS OF THE SAS GARDEN RELATED PARK.
AS COU4TY ROAD 51 CONTINUES THROUGH THE REt1A1tvDER OF THE SITE, THE
SANCTUARY RELATED PLANTINGS OF TREES, SHRUBS, ETC. WILL BE UTILIZED Cr;
THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE ROAD AS A BACK -DROP AND BUFFER TO THE GARDEN.
THIS WILL FURTHER STRENGTHEN THE C014TINUITY OF THE TOTAL SITE AND PLACE
A GREATER EMPHASIS AND IMPORTANCE TO THE ENTRY WITH THE GARDEN RELATED
PLANTINGS.
SANCTUARY CONCEPT
THE SANCTUARY WILL BE MAINTAINED IN ITS APPROXIMATE NATURAL STATE AS A
WILDLIFE -OBSERVATION AREA. PEDESTRIAN TRAILS, DECKS, BLINDS, BOARDWALKS,
ETC. WILL BE PROVIDED TO ALLOW PUBLIC VIEWING OPPORTUNITIES. THESE
FEATURES WILL BE LOCATED TO EMPHASIZE THE DIVERSITY OF PLANT COM1/04ITIES
AND HABITATS THAT EXIST WITHIN THE SITE. ENHANCEMENT OF THE VISUAL
CHARACTER OF THE SA14CTLIARY WILL BE ACHIEVED BY PLANTING SHRUBS AND
WILDFLOWERS ALCNG THE TRAIL NETWORK. THIS WILL COMPLEMENT THE DISPLAY
FEATURES OF THE GARDEN TO ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO UTILIZE THE TOTAL SITE.
GARDEN CONCEPT
THE GARDEN WILL BE DEVELOPED FOR GENERAL DISPLAY PURPOSES WITH A VARIETY
OF PLANTINGS AND DISPLAY FEATURES. TO ACHIEVE VARIETY, A CENTRAL GARDEN
AREA WILL SET IN A MATRIX OF GARDEN RELATED TREES AND SHRUBS. A PATHWAY
SYSTEM CONTAINING SMALLER GARDEN NODES WILL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE TREE -
SHRUB MATRIX. THIS CONCEPT PROVIDES UNE GARDEN NESTLED WITHIN ANOTHER.
THE CAPABILITIES OF THE SITE ARE THEREBY EXPANDED TO PROVIDE DIFFERENT
GARDEN EXPERIENCES.
THE CENTRAL GARDEN AREA WILL BE INTENSIVELY DEVELOPED WITH FLORAL DISPLAYS.
PREDOMINANT PLANT MATERIALS WILL BE ANNUALS, PERENNIALS, BULBS AND GROUND
COVERS. IN THIS AREA THERE WILL BE EMPHASIS ON GARDEN ACCENT FEATURES
SUCH AS ARBORS, WATER, WALLS, TERRACES, DECKS, SCULPTURE, ETC. SPECIFIC
FEATURES WITHIN THE CENTRAL GARDEN AREA ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1. VISITOR FACILITY BUI .DING
THIS BUILDING WILL BE LOCATED AT THE ENTRY TO THE GARDEtl AND WILE_ BE
DISCUSSED IN GREATER DETAIL UNDER SUPPORT FACILITIES.
2. PR I tARY FLORAL DISPLAY AREA
THIS AREA WILL CONTAIN THE GREATEST CONCENTRATION OF FLORAL DISPLAYS
AND IS IN THE SAME LOCATION AS THE EXISTING FLOWER GARDEN. IT WILL
CONSIST OF TF:REE SECTIONS, EACH HAVING A DIFFERENT DISPLAY CHARACTER,
SURROUNDING A CENTRAL TURF GRASS AREA.
3. GRAPE ARBOR
APJ EXISTING GRAPE ARBOR, WILL BE RENOVATED MID UTILIZED IN THE GARDEN.
4. MEN!OP, IAL ARBOR
ON Tif SITE OF THE FORMER, RESIDENCE WILL BE A MEMORIAL ARBOR WITH A
TERRACE SURRt3UPJDlt.'G IT. THIS ARBOR IS REQUIRED TO MEET ONE OF THE
PROVISIONS OF THE WILL.
5. TERRACE OVERLOOK
THIS FEATURE WILL BE LOCATED ON THE FOL94DATION LEVEL OF AN EXISTING
GARAGE. THE GARAGE WILL BE REMOVED AND A TERRACE SURFACE CONSTRUCTED
ON THE FOUNDATION. THIS LEVEL IS APPROXIMATELY 15 FEET ABOVE THE
AREA NORTH OF IT WHICH WILL BE DEVELOPED AS A GARDEN TO BE VIEWED
FROM ABOVE.
6. LAKE OVERLOOK DECK
AN OVERLOOK DECK WILL BE DEVELOPED BETWEEN THE MEMORIAL ARBOR AND
THE LAKE TO PROVIDE A BETTER VIEW OF THE LAKE AND THE EXISTING GAZEBO.
7. GAZEBO
THIS IS AN EXISTING BUT SOMEWHAT DETERIORATED FEATURE ON THE SHORE OF
CRYSTAL BAY. IT HAS BECOME A LAKE ORIENTED LANDMARK AND WILL BE
RESTORED AS AN IMPORTANT FEATURE OF THE GARDEN.
WATER FEATURE
THIS FEATURE WILL START AT THE MEMORIAL ARBOR TERRACE AND FLOW =%N
BOT" TIDES OF THE HILL FOR A TOTAL LENGTH OF APPROXIMATELY 450 FEET.
IT WILL CONSIST OF A SERIES OF POOLS, CHANNELS AND SMALL WATERFALLS
WITH A DECK DEVELOPED PARTLY OVER THE POOL ON ITS WEST END.
THE PATHWAY -PERIPHERAL GARDEN NODES WILL ENCIRCLE THE CENTRAL GARDEN AREA
AND PROVIDE DIFFERENT TYPES OF EXPERIENCES. THE GARDEN NODES WILL NOT
CE SCALED DOWN DUPLICATIONS OF THE CENTRAL GARDEN AREA, BUT WILL FEATURE
DIFFERENT EMP.-IASES WITH WOODY PLANTS HAVING AN EQUAL OR GREATER ROLE
THAN HERBACEOUS PLANTS IN THE DISPLAYS. THE TYPES OF GARDEN NODES WILL BE:
1. AZALEA GARDEN
THIS WILL BE LOCATED WITHIN AN EXISTING GROVE OF PINE TREES WHICH
PROVIDES THE SPECIFIC SITE REQUIREMENTS FOR THESE PLANTS.
c. SHADE GARDENS
THIS MODE WILL CONSIST OF TWO AREAS RECEIVING MODERATE TO HEAVY SHADE
FOR DISPLAY OF PLANTS WENCH CAN TOLERATE AND THRIVE IN SHADT;(_C*)Ip'LCYES.
VISUAL GARDEN
THE AREA WORTH OF THE EXISTING GARAGE WILL BE DEVELOPED TO BE VIEWED
FRCI� THE TERRACE ON THE GARAGE FOUNDATION ABOVE.
L . NATIVE ORNA1•ENTAL GAROFt IS
TWO AREAS WILL BE DEVELOPED WITH NATIVE ORNA1tiNTAL PLANTS, PRECCM]tANTLY
FLCWERING SHRUBS.
�. MEDICINAL AND EDIBLE DISPLAY GARDEN
AN AREA AT THE WEST END OF THE SITE WILL BE DEVELOPED WITH PLANT VARIL'IES
HISTORICALLY USED FOR MEDICINAL OR EDIBLE PURPOSES. IT WILL ALSO CONTAIN
'IATIVE At+D/OP, WILD PLANTS RATHcR TFV-JN DOPES T ICATED CULZ IVATED PLANTS.
G�
6. SPRING BULB DISPLAYS
TWO AREAS ALONG THE LAKESHORE WILL BE DEVELOPED AS SPRING BULB
DISPLAYS. THE SOUTH FACING SLOPES SHOULD CAUSE EARLIER FLOWERING
AND EXTEND THE SEASON OF BLOOM.
7. TERRACED GARDEN
THIS NODE WILL BE IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE VISITOR FACILITY
BUILDING. IT WILL BE A MULTI -LEVEL GARDEN STEPPING D01•IN TO THE
LAKESHORE.
THE OPEN FLAT AREA ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE SITE WILL BE DEVELOPED
AS A DISPLAY MEADOW, WITH A PATHWAY CIRCLING THE EDGE AND OVERLOOKING
THE MEADOW. THIS WILL ADD ANOTHER DIMENSION AND EXPERIENCE LEVEL TO
THE GARDEN. 1N ALL OTHER DISPLAYS OF THE GARDEN THE SCALE OF VIEWING
IS CLOSE AND INTIMATE, BUT IN THE MEADOW THE SCALE OF VIEWING WILL
BF OPEN AND MORE EXPANSIVE.
SUPPORT FACILITIES
CERTAIN SUPPORT FACILITIES ARE A NECESSITY FOR THE EFFECTIVE USE AND
MANAGEMENT OF Th,_ GARDEN AND SANCTUARY. THE ENTRY AND PARKING WILL BE
LOCATED ON THE EAST PART OF THE SITE. A PARKING LOT FOR 65 CAPS WILL
BE PROVIDED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CO. RD. 51 AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE
GARDEN. A DROP-OFF AND TURN -AROUND TO ACCOMMODATE BUSES WILL BE INCLUDED.
BUS PAPKING WILL BE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CO. RD. ;1. A SEPARATE DROP-OFF
AND RAt-11P TO THE VISITOR FACILITY WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THE HANDICAPPED.
PARKING FOR 126 CARS WILL BE PROVIDED NORTH OF CO. RD. 51. THIS WILL
PROVIDE DIRECT ACCESS YO THE SANCTUARY AND ADDITIONAL PARKING FOR THE
GARDEN.
THE DEVELOPMENT OF A VISITOR FACILITY BUILDING IS ESSENTIAL TO THE
E14JOYlAF-PIT AND COt1FORT OF THE USER PUBLIC. THE ;,TRUCTURE WILL BE LOCATED
AT THE ENTRY TO THE GARDEN TO SERVE AS THE INITIAL CONTACT POINT FOR ALL
VISITORS. IT WILL BE A YEAR ROUND FACILITY FOR THE FOLLOWING:
1, VISITOR CONTACT SUCH AS DISPERSAL OF INFORMATION ABOUT TILE GARDEN,
DISPLAYS AND STAFF CONTACT.
2. VISITOR COMFORT INCLUDING RESTROOMS, DRINKING FOUNTAINS, TELEPHONE
AND LOUNGE.
3. DEMONSTRATION -EDUCATION OPPORTUNITIES WITH AN AREA FOR DEMONSTRATION
OF METHODS AND PRACTICES USED IN THE OPERATION OF THE GARDEN AND
CLASSROOM SPACE TO CONDUCT CLASSES IN GARDENING AND RELATED SUBJECTS.
TO EFFECTIVELY OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE GARDEN, A SERVICE FACILITY WILL
BE. LOCATED NORTH OF COUNTY 5L NEAR THE ENTRANCE TO THE GARDEN AND WILL CONTAIN
SPACE FOR THE FOLLOWING:
1. ADMINISTRATION, INCLUDING AN OFFICE, RESTROG'S, EMJLOYEE WORKSPAC`=
AND LUrJCHROOM.
2. MAINTENANCE, INCLUDING VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT, STORAGE AND WORKSPACE.
3. PROPAGATION, INCLUDING GREENHOUSE, HEADHOUSE, LATHHOUSE, OUTDOOR
CONTAINER PLANT AREA AND AN OUTDOOR PLANT PROPAGATION AREA.
4. SPECIAL WORKSPACE FOR SAFE HANDLING AND DISPOSAL OF PESTICIDES.
ACCESS TO SPECIAL POPULATION GROUPS
WITH EXISTING BUS SERVICE TO THE SITE FROM DOVff)TOWN MINNEAPOLIS, THIS
SITE WILL BE READILY AVAILABLE TO ALL POPULATION GROUPS. PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT IS DESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE THE NEEDS OF SPECIAL POPULATION
GROUPS (ESPECIALLY HANDICAPPED). ALL PATHWAYS WILL BE SURFACED TO
ACCOMMODATE WHEELCHAIRS. GRADES OF THE PATHWAYS WILL BE SUCH THAT
WHEELCHAIRS WILL HAVE ACCESS TO ABOUT 90% OF THE GARDEN. IN GENERAL,
ANY FACILITIES NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE THE HANDICAPPED OR OTHER SPECIAL
POPULATION GROUPS WILL BE INTEGRATED INTO THE OVERALL DESIGN, RATHER
THA,J PROVIDIH'G SPECIAL FACILITIES FOR SPECIAL GROUPS. AN EXAMPLE OF THIS
IS WHERE RAMPS ARE REQUIRED TO ALLOW t-MEELCHAIR ACCESS. THESE WILL BE
TIED INTO THE OVER!'+-L CIRCULATION SYSTEM AND MADE ATTRACTIVE FOR ALL USERS.
MULTI -SEASON USE
PUBLIl. USE OF A DISPLAY GARDEN IN THE MINNESOTA CLIMATE IS SOMEWHAT LIMITED
TO THE WARM MOUTHS OF THE YEAR. BECAUSE OF THIS, A STRONG EFFORT WILL XAS=
TO EXTEND THE USEAGE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE YEAR. THIS WILL BE DONE THROUGH
THE FOLLOWINIG EFFORTS:
1. USE OF PLANT MATERIALS WHICH HAVE ATTRACTIVE WINTER CHARACTERISTICS
SUCH AS COLORED BARK AIJD FRUITS.
2. USE OF THE GARDEN IN THE WINTER AS A BIRD 1•lATCHJNG AREA. THIS CAN
BE ACCOMPLISHED BY THE USE OF PLANT MATERIALS ATTRACTIVE TO BIRDS
AS WELL AS SUPPLEMENTARY FEEDING.
3. INTERPRETIVE -EDUCATIONAL USE THR(7UGh f)fi THE YEAR. BY OFFERING
CLASSES AND INTERPRETIVE PROGRAMS, THE VISITOR FACILITY WILL
EXTEND THE USER SEASON TO THE ENTIRE YEAR. CLASSES AND PROGRAMS
IN GARDENING, BIRD IDENTIFICATION AND FEEDING ARE EXAtIPLES OF
WINTERTIME USE. THE SANCTUARY GROUNDS WILL BE USED AS AN INTERPRETIVE
AREA THROUGHOUT THE YEAR.
USER CAPACITY
ACCURATE ESTIMATION OF USE OF A PROPOSED FACILITY OF THIS TYPE WOULD BE
VERY DIFFICULT TO DETERMINE. A THEORETICAL DESIGN CAPACITY CAN BE
ESTIMATED BASED UPON THE SIZE OF THE FACILITY AND AN ASSUMED DENSITY OF
USE:
THE DEVELOPIMENT PLAN OF THE GARDEN INCLUDES APPROXIMATELY 1.31 MILES
OF PAT K4AY. AN ASSUMED DENSITY OF USE OF AN AVERAGE OF ONE PERSON
EVERY TEN FEET THROUGHOUT THE PATHWAY SYSTEM GIVES A CAPACITY OF APPROX-
IMATELY 700 1SEPS AT ONE TIME. AN EXPECTED TURNOVER RATE OF THREE PER
DAY GIVES A DAILY CAPACITY OF 2,100 USERS.
HCPRD/P&I-
1977
LAKE MINNETONKA—CRYSTAL SAY
_--..- IMCa 1MrQOMOIA 04M
QISRf1105
EEEEE ww smK AIS
woM�R rs
_ VAUM OUTUT
S... Tt+P to..rat -pt.
of Pwblk
Wont -Sur. r Dori-
- contour mft".1 . taro Ipt
—Ti. 6.ey 6 6.9. ".4 tone i wic.Nt the
0n wtt46 of.. P ,k 60-4 ry
NOERENBERG MEMORIAL
COUNTY PARK
erMw.l f..Afers
exiHiwg10
N f NNlNN
coumv
P"K
■fsam
11
DISTMICT
i
P! 1thNIN6 •
1H71Nff�IMO
OM/1t1 MINT
1. ' - JA -* r• —
'r. •J efdl '
C� NERMIIIm GARDEN NODE
�A•• .••'ram 4�••. �-'-" -.� -"_ -%06—
i
:.fit !:� �J �''�� +� ___. �'-�M-•��
_ �_ {� � .!!-•' ter• +�
� � r �, ,` .` \ l { �� -� //v�im •._
+ - ------- ... .. r. r t
�--
ttdfi��e•• fGo. _
LAKE MINt.ITv, r:A -Cil: 1 �L SAY
... PATHWAY SYSTEM
mm GARDEN RELATED TRUS-SH
._ SANCTUARY RELATED TRIIS-
� ENTRY ROAD
m1MMIDEO
R•.• mop .—I. - D.pl. cl Rublk I
Work. - Sur..y Dlvulo.r
— C—t— ml.—1 - 1— T..1
pray bad R"—d '
area o.l.id• Ih. pork b�d•ry
NOERENMG
_ - S.VYIr 1 1 PM►R�
10 NENNton 1
COON.
YARA
ISIRVI
DISTRICT
PLANNING A
INGINILRING
z i=-- OE►AR TAINT ,
c0.
- - ° ', \
caii
100
r ,e _ ------
•e,, , ���_ __ °'���_• iris
-%, f'ri,I sir 1: �•,i ! � �`�0 1�--- •`
------------
HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE DISTRICT µp NING
ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT
circulation diagram MAY 1977
0 50 10011
NOEHENBERG MEMORIAL COUNTY PARK
40Z
PLANNWO
HENNEPIN COUNT Y PARK RESERVE DISTRICT AND
EF001"9100M
GARDEN & SANCTUARY spatial diagram an Off
r -')ERENBERG MEMORIAL %O."o"'OUNTY PARK
eNA c
��tF:�rl.� tLL'ti:►►t r
r / i
w�/
MtdM�s,4 i
�^M�r
MINNEHAHA CREEK
uU raNnoNNA
WATERSHED DISTRICT
P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 MIMMi5011 pr�l�
BOARD Of MANAGERS: David H Cochran Pies . Alberl I Lehman . Jchn E Thomas
Michael R Carroll .Camille 0 Andre -James B McWelhy .James R Spensley
SPECIAL MEETING NOTICE
A special meeting of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District will be held on Thursday, December 13, 1984, at 4:30
p.m., iii the conference room of E. A. Hickok and Associates, 545
.Lndian Mound, Wayzata., Minnesota, for the purposes of conducting a
work session of the Managers regarding revisions to the surface
water management policy drafts, and regarding future steps to be
taken in Chapter 509 management planning.
3442n
COUNCIL MEETING
NOV w fi iy:
CITY OF ORONO
_uITY OF OFsONC► I
WESTONKA iENIOR
CITIZENS INC.
SPONSOUD BY SUBl1RIIXN (:OM��1l'\I'Il' SI:R\'ICI: • A I 'NF11:U \\'AY AGEN(N • N101'\U, \11NNLSO7A 5536•1
5600 Lynwood Blvd.
COUNCIL MEETING
City of Orono
Dear Council and Staff: NOV 2 fi lye':
It, is befitting to this holiday week to note the
cooperation between the cities of Orono, Minnetrista, CITY OF O R O N O
Spring Park and :found that exemplifies the spirit of
the original Thanksgiving.
The Westonka Senior Citizens, Inc. would like to
express Cratitude to you for yourrecent efforts in
behalf of our successful Senior Center. This co-
operative attitude on the part of our cities regard-
ing the seniors, has always been a shining star in
the seven -county metropolitan area. It is rare that
cities have the fortitude and strength to look beyond
their own boundaries fob- the good of their citizens.
Thank you! Thank you! Orono. We are proud to
be your citizens.
Happy Thanksgiving,
Merlyn (Doc) Meier, President
Westonka Senior Citizens, Inc.
I V
I
; �,� 11,-V 2 010 4
UU1 Il�r
CITY OF NMI
Lonie Fisk
723 Water Street
Apartment 103
Excelsior, MN 55331
Dear Mr. Fisk:
CITY of ORONO
Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 553239Municipal offices
On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka
November 19, 1984
COUNCIL MEETING
NOV 2 G 1984
CITY OF ORONO
Staff must reschedule your variance application No. 820,
originally scheduled for action at the Council meeting of
November 26, 1984, until a later meeting date. Staff illnesses
and our City Attorney's heavy court schedule for the month of
November have prevented us fiom scheduling a meeting to review
the facts and findings that must be incorporated in a denial
resolution as Council requested.
Council also directed that the final draft of t:iat resolution
be sent to all parties with interest at leas_ a week before the
meeting that Council will act on your application. Staff will
not reschedule the application until staff can be assured that
directive is satisfied.
Please call my office if you have and, questions or if you
you have a conflict with either a December 10, 1984 or January 14,
1985 meeting date.
Sincerely,
��-j e. / A"V-
Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
CC: Curtis Fisk
Ronald H. Batty
Robert L. Hoffman
Garth C. Collor
Mr. & Mrs. Phillip Bradley
Mr. & Mrs. David Ilse
Mr. & Mrs. Donald Meyer
Council Members & Lynn Adams
1WQ111N1i&20'.%jNG 1737357 • AD%41%1%1kA1111NA11%A--tl 4737358 • Pt11L1( NUkA1 4?37159
As"11 r ;
V-{
L('�- /y7C.l �•'�!
'ffc
/%�� h t f /%ic emb <�Y
Ax
+7y- �YS
Yam„.
i
[._. _: I Y 0F 0 R 0 N 5 �1
/r
?� i t'.-<•� •r- %� f'�'."c h�t3C, L.c•ts ('tom-//%'-2� •Y!'c'�r�
elo F
It
�N@19OWR
�� I , ��_ r) ro �i
C�u C BEET NG. _
TO: ALL CLERKS
FROM: Joel Jamnik, Legislative Counsel
RE: Cable Television
1�
I CI i Y OF ORGivC� I
As you probably already know, President Reagan signed the Cable
Communications Policy Act of 1984 on October 30, 1984. It is
important to note, however, that the bill goes into effect on
December 29, 1984.
It is essential that cities exercise great caution before making any
changes in the provisions of existing franchises, particularly
changes requested by the city's cable operator. While the
legislation will eventually require some changes in the relationship
betweer, cities and cable operators, it has no immediate effect for -
existing franchises for two reasons.
First, the legislation is not effective until the end of December
arid, second, it grandfathers many provisions of existing franchises.
Ir, those areas in which changes are necessary, the changes are
gradually phased in over an extended period of time. The authority
to regulate basic service rates, for example, is grandfathered for
two years in existing franchises and franchise renewals. No changes
should be made without consulting the new legislation. The League
hopes to have a comprehensive guidebook on cable (published by the
National League of Cities) available some time before the
legislation s effective date.
In a relate, cable matter, the State Cable Communications Board rx1l—
be wlU*%ting comments for its December and January meetings
need for or desirability of a separate rule or set of rules
regulating the m'inicipally owned or operated cable television
systems. Last week the City of Windom received confirmation from the
board as the owner and operator of the system within the city by
means of granting the city variances from the existing rules. Not
surprisingly, private cable operators who do not like the idea of
municipally owned systems; raised the question whether separate rules
relating to municipal ownership of cabl? systems ought to be enacted.
If you wish to make formal or informal comments on this sub,)ect or if
your• City may be interested in a municip.•1 system, either upon
orlgl►,al construction or on renewal, please contact Stan Peskar or
myself at the League offices.
COUNCIL MEETING
as �.xiation of
metropolitan
municipalities
r4ov 2. r 1� ,"
B U L L ET YN
November 15, 1984
TO: Memb ayors and Managers/Administrators
FROM: Ver Werson, Executive Director
� o C� �
► OV ! 61984 ;
i
CiT--TYF ORONO
RE: Metropolitan and AMM Activities of Importance
-I WOULD LIKE TO BRING SEVERAL ITEMS TO YOUR ATTENTION;
1. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL'S REVISED HOUSING GUIDE; POLICY
PLAN;
The Metropolitan Council will be holding a public
hearing oi; Thursday, November 29, 1984 at 2:00 P.M. in
the Metropolitan Council Chambers. As reported in a
previous Bulletin, the AMM Ho:ising Committee and Board
of Directors have reviewed the "hearing draft" document
very thoroughly anti have prepared a report delineating a
number of concerns and recommendations. A copy of the
AMM report is enclosed in the Manager/Administrator
mailing only and your city should have received a copy
of the Housing Guide C-�.apter Draft directly from the
Metropolitan Council 'n late October. The AMM Board and
Housing Committee have several major, concerns with the
Housing Guide Chapter and I wuuld encourage you to
review the Housing Guide Chapter "hearing draft" and the
AMM report. I would also suggest that if you share the
AMM concerns that your city make its concerns known at
the public hearing..___ Also lease discuss this matter
directly with thel:n� iatropolican Councilmember from
your district. I would appreciate receiving a copy of
any written statement or correspondence you prepare for
this hearing.
2. TECHNICAL ADVTSORY COMMITTEE (TAC) APPOINTMENTS:
The major functions of TAC are to provide technical
assistance, advice, and recommendations to the
Metropolitan Area Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) on
all facets of regional transportation planning. The
AMM has eight suburban appointees on TAC and they mu3t
be at the Department Head Level (i.e. City F.ntineer,
-1-
v ;;. , „ •t. tit �: '!, tnit�n��t?ta z` ilii Iti12) 2: 7•$6041
Planning Director, Community Development Director,
etc.). The TAC meets monthly at the Metropolitan
Council Office and TAC members usually serve on at least
one subcommittee. The persons to be appoint, will
serve two-year terms comencing in January of 1985.
THE AMM BOARD IS SOLICITING NOMINATIONS FOR 'A;,Z
MEMBERS VIA THIS BULLETIN. YOUR NOMINATIONS SHOULD BE
ENT TO VERN PETERSON IN THE AMM OFFICE BY NO LATER
THAN WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBERR 27TH. THE PRESSN AN';
APPOINTEES WILL BE GIVEN PRIORITY CONSIDERATION BUT
SOME NEW APPOINTME14TS WILL BE MADE SO PLEASE FORWARD
YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS.
3. THE MEMBERSHIP MEETING TO APPROVE LEGISLATIVE POLICY
:'ROGRAM - DECEMBER 6, 1984 7:30 P.M.
I would like to remind you 3f this very important
meeting which will be held n the Council Chambers of
the Richfield City Hall (6700 Portland Ave.). she
adoption of the Annual Legislative Program is very
important as it determines the AMM lobby efforts on
behalf of the cities in the metropolitan area. PLEASE
MAKE SURE THAT YOUR CITY IS REPRESENTED AT THIS MEETING
TO ASSURE THAT THE VIEWS OF YOUR CITY ARE REPRESENTED.
4. SURVEY OF MEMBERSHIP SERVICES!
As reported in a previous Bulletin the AMM Board of
Directors established a twelve (12) member Membership
Services Committee, Chaired by Jim Spore, Burnsville
City Manager, to evaluate and assess the organizations'_
performance. The AMM is in its eleventh year of
operation and the Board felt it was time to directly
assess and evaluate performance to assure that we
continue to provide you with the kind of programs,
asw,-.aa.. information and services that meets your needs as a city
C 4:4; official. 'The Committee has determined that to do its
job thoroughly it needs ;Lour input. 'nn.eq, ntly, the
Committee has developed aD Opinion S ' cy Questionnaire
which will be mailed to all Mayors, .uuncilmembers, and
Managers/Administra'.ors in the very near future. WE
WOULD SOLICIT YOUR COOPERATION IN THIS MATTER AND WOULD
APPRECIATE IT IF THIS SURVEY WOULD BE MENTIONED AT A
COUNCIL MEETING AND ENCOURAGEMENT GIVEN TO ALL THOSE
RECFI VING THE QUESTIONNAIRE TO COMPLETE IT AND RETURN IT
TO THE AMM OFFICE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. One of the
purposes of the sLrvey is tc provide an opportunity for
member city officials to help determine future
directions of the AMM.
Thank yo.
1";=AV#At,
association of
metropolitan
municipalities
PROPOSED REVISIONS
We]
HOUSING CHAPTER OF THE METROPOLITAN
DEVELOPMENT GUIDL
(Dated October, 1984)
The AMM Housing Committee and Board cf Directors have
completed their review of the proposed revisions to the
Housing Chapter of the Mntropolitan Development Guide. The
committee spent all or part of six different committee
meetings in the cour-ce of this review. The Housing Committee
and Board are in general agreement with the overall thrust of
the major concepts contained in the Housing Chapter, but do
have a number of concert,:, and offer several recommendations
for dealing with these concerns.
The committee's and board's concerns and recommendations are
contained ,ice.-Ahw following pages of this report. Section ,1,
contains th&�wvre ;general concerns and Section II contains.-v :,-
more specific concerns on a page by page basis.
Rep t Adopted By AMM Housing Committee - October 18, 1984
Report Approved By AMM :,oard of Directors - November 1, 1984
-I -
L __.
GENERAL CO"7CERNS
1. COMMUNITY INDEX
The AM11 has major concerns relative to the Council's intent
to introduce the Community Index concept into the housing and
grant review process conducted by the Metropolitan Council. The
eiiectiveness of any tool used �o prom .e and produce more
affordable housing within communities in the metropolitan area
depends a great deal on its creditability and acceptance by local
officials. Hared on an extensive review of the written material
describing the Community Index and discussions with the Council's
Housing Staff, the AMM believes this concept is premature. To a
large Extent, the index is based on a "snap shot in time" of the
existing housing already built in t',is area. Since the housing
already in place will provide the bulk of the housing stock for
at least the next ten (10) years, communities might be unfairly
penalized because of this. The existing housing is largely a
reflection of ttie market place and has little to do with the
"good" or "bad" intentions of local officials and they should not
be judged or held accountable for conditions over which they have
little or no control. Also, the exact same houses in different
areas might differ greatly in market value because of the
influence of the market place and other i.ntan,-ibiles.
The AMM also questions the wisdom or fairness of judging every
community by the same standards since much of the housing type,
style and cost is a reflection of the market and has little to do
with planning. It almost appears that the intent of this index
is to make each and every ci`y a microcosm of the region as whole
and the AMM does nest believe this is necessary, advantage, or
even good public policy.
The AMM does believe that the information (data) ddsctd' �d in the
Community Index is useful planning information for city officials
and should be useful for internal planning purposes on a city by
city basis. However, the index should not be used as a "control
technique" by the Metropolitan Council at this time becau---e of
its deficiencies and the many unanswered questions.
Recommendations: If the M-,tropolitan Council decides tc proceed
with the "Comm�inity Index" concept, for a period of time (perhaps
two or thrE ears) it should be used only as a bilateral
plannirq top'. -en the Metropolitan council and the to^aI
commun. ies. is, when the Council eviews a local housing
project or proposal, the comments :t maker based I the "Index
criteria should only go back to the community and not be included
as part of the official review comments.
2. Influences of the Market Place on Cost and Type_of Housing:
A major goal of the Metropolitan Council over the years has been
to promote more affordable housing and more licat:on2l housing
choices for persons of moderate and iow incomes. The AMM has
supported that goal and continues to do so. The ilou;; i r. r •-',u i Je
Chapter and the associated reviews based on the Guide Chapter
conducted by the Council of local pr,jects and proposals is the
major tool used ty the Council to implement this goal. It is
important therc'•,,-e, that the Council's 'lousing luide Chapter and
review procedures and process be considered creditable by local
cials. The AM11 by and large, agrees with most elements in
Housing Guide Chapter but also believes it has major
deficiencies. The information and guidelines con'Uained in the
Chapter and consequently some of the recommendations simply d(
nc.t rp ; the "real world" in terms oL the effect of the market.
p'_� Hypes, styles, sizes, et.c. of the hou-in, ing
pr,.. any given point in time. City officials just not
:Javc -1:';, authority and control over the cost. any type of
housi.., ;R produced as implied and assumed in the Housing
Guide C►._pter and; therefore, the Council's recommendations may
not be perceived as creditable. If recommendations are not
perceived as creditable, they may be ignured.
Recommendation: That a section discuss.,,g the impacts and role
of the market place on housing tyre, style and costs, etc. be
added to the Housing Guide Chapter.
?. -ife Cycle Housing and Al`ernatives.
One of tht major thrusts of the revisions to the Hou-ing
Chapter is to promote mare attached and multifamily housir►b �:d
rather alternative types of housing w:;hir, e metropolitan area
and within each community. The implied assumption is that t•iore
afford able ;ousi—, will then be- available and greater locational
choice pre3ent. -ne t..,-jst of. .t:e revisions is that each and
every community a:ust have a cainplete assortment of lift- cycle
housing types and t,.,using alter ;a' ivies.
The AMM agrees with the general concept that ati.eched and
multifamily hot. ing is more affordable although there aro: a lot
of exceptions . ..3use of market ; ' .;ce i of luer►ces. ►e :%,,M also
supports the ,;or.cept that more "lire cycle" housing is neede•
within the metropo'_'" n r�-�ea. The AMM d,:as not agree in the
literal sense, hoap• t�-.a,, eaen and every community _-r;•Jst have
every ty-c of life ycle housing. The A�1M does not be; ieve this
is e.iY►er practical or necessary or even possible becau•;e of the
market place influence. Since this is a very mo." le area with
adequate public transit and has a regional identity with 'local
political boundaries posing no real barrier, life cycle housing
can be viewed on a more regional basis.
Recommendation: That the Housing Guide draft be further
mod i ied in several sections to advocate more of a regional or
community clustering approach for promoting and provided life
cycle housing. The Housing Chapter does recognize and advocate
that approach for replacement housing for those persons displaced
by public action.
4. Responsibilities for Providing Housing for Lower Income Persons.
There e a number of inference: and an implied assumption that
as the federal and state level_; of government decrease their
fundin& commitments for subsidized housing for lower income
persons, that the responsibility for picking up the slack is
automatically assumed by local units of government. This is no:
fair, nor is it possible. Locals do have certain.
responsibilities and techniques to provide opportunities for low
and moderate cost housing and the ?MM believes that they should
do so. However, the federal arid state levels of government have
much broader and deeper tax bases and they should provide the
bulk of the runding for direct housing subsides. Those levels
should not abrogate their responsibilities to provide the
necessary funding to implement their housing policy.
Recommendation: The Housing Chapter be revised to make the
distinction between providing opportunities for low and moderate
cost housing (which is a local responsibility) and the actual
provision of this housing thru subsides and other programs.
Also, the Housing Chapter and Legislative Initiatives should
clearly state the responsibility of the federal and state levels
In providing funding for subsidized housing.
5. Local Plan Monitoring.
There are several statements in the Mousing Chap::er and its
} appendices which discuss the Council's ns to M,:isw projects
and proposals for• internal consistency with 104el comp plans.
The AMM believes such internal monitoring is inappropriate and
inconsistent with the Counc.1's statutory mission. The Council
has responsibility to assure consistency with regional plans,
goals and programs and its review should be directed in that
manner. The Council was not established to be an overseer or
general i— nitor of local government activity.
Recommendation- The Housing Guide be revised to eliminate the
statements and implications that it is the Council's role and
responsibility to monitor local activities and programs for
con^istency with local plans.
Section II. Saecific Comments and Recommendations
i. For -Sale }lousing. (pages 11-12). The AMM agrees that there is
an "affordable housing problem" for many persons, but the
background material probably overstate the problem. Since the
median represents the middle, many people with lower incomes can
still purchase housing. The AMM does not believe that
irrespective of income, it is an inalienable right for all
persons to purchase the "dream house" in the "dream location".
Nor is its Nor 's obligation to fulfill that expectation.
Also, while it is generally true that "first time" buyers are
hardest hit because of the high interest rates of recent years,
it may not be much easier for "roll over" buyer to move "upward"
in housing.
Policy on 1 page 11 is acceptable to the AMM but the background
material should be clarified.
2. Rental Housing. (pages 12-13). The AMM agrees with the policy
hoal (more affordable rental units be built or added to existing
housing stock) but has reservations how this policy will be
used by the Council in "Policy 34" type reviews in terms of
accessory housing ordinances. The problem of "protective
covernances" over which the city has no control can also be a
problem.
Policy 2 should be modified ar;: softened to recognize the
importance and desires of residents to maintain the character of
their neighborhoods and properly values.
3. Reduced Housing Costs (page 14). In the background material
under lot size or density, the first sentence should be rewritten
to clarify that the lot size or density is the factor that can
most easily by influenced or controlled by a city. The AMM notes
that a correction is needed in the last paragraph on page r4. Add
the words "per acre" after units in the fourth line. In the
paragraph dealing with gara-,es, the AMM believes. it should be
nc.t rswritten, as follows: Local land use regulations should not
require the construction of garages. However, the regulations
should require the placement (,f the house on the lot so that a
garage could be built. at a later, date".
4. Lif- Cyc:.e Housing - Trends in housing Types and Preferences.
(pages 19-20). one of the thrusts of the revised housing chapter
is to pr)mote different types of attached and multifamily housing
'o provide more ,affordable housing. This type of housing
probably is cheaper to build, but for some reason, it. might cost
more to purchase. I is the AMM's feeling that otner factors (no
maintenance, no snow shoveling, location, prestige, etc.) have
more influence on the purchase price than the cost of
construction.
The AMM supports the basic concept of life cycle housing and
alternative housing types but believes some clarification should
be made. (see General Concerns 2 and 3). The AMM recommends
revising policy 10 on page 20 to reflect more of a regional
approach in the planning for life -cycle housing needs.
Handicapped - Accessible }sousing. (page 21). The AMM has a
problem with policy 12. The policy states that funds should be
made available but does not state where this funding should come
from. The AMM believes it is the responsibility of the federal
and state levels of government to provide these funds because of
their broader tax bases.
The AMM has concerns with respect to policy 16 on page 25 which
introduces the "Community Index Concept." The committee believes
the Community Index might be a useful tool to serve as a guide
for local planning effort but believes there are too many
variables and unanswere questions for the Council tc use th.io
index in a "policy 34" type review situation. (see General
Concern 1)
Recommendation: If the Council proceeds with the Community Index
Concept, it should be used as an advisory and experimental basis
initially.
6. Policy 17 on page 25. The AMM recommends tightening the wording
to refl,,..t the federal definition of low income persons.
Policy 18 on page 26. The AMM does not object to this policy but
believes it mixes two different concepts into a single policy and
thereby poss>»ly creating confusion. (concentration of
subsidized housing and the fact that design and construction for
subsidized housing should no`. be inferior to market rate
housing).
3. Uolicy 21 on page 28. The AMM concurs with this policy.
9. Policy 22. The AMM has a concern with the B. portion of this
policy (housing strategy for older developed suburbs) which
really does not define a strategy as much as it discusses tools.
This statement should be amplified to explain how the various
subsidy tools can be used to meet the needs of the lowest income
groups.
1'�• Page 34, background material relative to deteriorated
neighborhoods. The last sentence of the first paragraph needs to
be amplified to explain that "low quality service" does not refer
just to the services provided by the city. The AMM does not
agree with the implication that z city provides its services
WE
on a selective basis.
11. Page 35, third paragraph from oottom of page. The AMM does not
feel it is really feasible under current economic and financial
conditions of cit`.es to do much land banking. It is very, very
e-pensive just to hold land for development sometime in the
future.
12. Housing Maintenance, Redevelopment and 'Neighborhood Preservation.
'the AMM supports policy 23 on page 32.
Policy 24 on Mandated Housing Maintenance Code. (page 33). The
AMM does not support this policy for several reasons: cost to
implement., code not needed in all cities at present time, if
there is to be a mandatory maintenance code, it should be
statewide and not just in the metropolitan area. The AMM does
not ouject to the last sentence of this policy provided the word
"pripert.," is removed prior to the word "tax."
Policy 25 on page 33. The AMM believes that the words
"market -rate" should be deleted in the lath. line of this policy.
A distinction should not be made between market rate and
subsidized housing in terms of locational considerations.
Policy 26 on page 311. The AMM believes that existing state and
federal requirements provide necessary protection. There is also
concern that the way the first sentence is written it may have a
negative impact on rehabilitation and clearance as related to
deteriorated housing. The AMM does support the concept that
replacement housing be considered on a regional basis.
Policy 2*1 on page 34. Tt,e AMM recommends adding the word
"qualified" between "t-)" and "parsons" on the second line of this
policy.
13. Energy Conservation:
Policy 2) or, page 4,). The A-M!'CV s4pbrts the intent of this policy
but believes that the words "particularly attached housing"
should be removed at the end of the first sentence. :3ince most
housing is "detached" it should also be energy efficient. Also,
the Council's emphasizes on attached housing to reduce hou.3ing
costs in general is dealt with directly in other policies.
14. Government Housing Roles and Responsibility. The AMM recommends
the addition of one additional concept for inclusion in policy 30
on page 43. Role '. should read "Support for research to define
housing issues and problems and the implications of the market on
affordable housing."
_7 -
Policy 31 on page 43. The AMM recommends several modifications
to this policy.
-14. A study of the implications of state tax policies on the
production of affordable housing.
-5. Projects or programs of the MHFA should be consistent with
regional and local plans.
-role 2. should read: Increased funding for the "circuit
breaker" property tax refund or equivalent programs for very low
income renters.
Policy 32 on page 44. The AMM does not disagree with this policy
but believes that cities should be allowed to use CDBG funds for
planning purposes (i.e. revising local comp plans to comply with
this policy).
Policy 34 on page 45. The word "opportunities" should be added
after the word "housing" and before "for" on the third line of
this policy and after "housing" and before "in" in the fourth
line.
First paragraph on page 25. The AMM has serious reservations
about the "Community Index" concept and therefore does not
support this statement as wr,*tten.
?olicy 19 on page 26. The AMM supports this policy.
Policy 37 on page 47. The AMM believes the second paragraph of
this policy should be rewritten. After "applicants" and before
"in" in the third line, "to the exclusion of others" the
committee believes that some local preference is okay to protect
their own needy residents.
Policy 37 on page 47. The AMM feels the first paragraph should
be written to be more positive. i.e. The Council will recommend
continues fant_itn6- -which has made - -. This change would Laxsdi •
to recognize cuff mandties which have done a good job with
housing if written in that fashion. The it rather than
the "stick" approach.
Policy on sage 48. The AMM agrees with thi--1 policy but
believes the Council should indicate its strong support for the
continuation of the section 8 housing programs.
Policy 40 on page 48. The AMM strongly supports this policy.
15. Consumer Information/Protection. (pages 50-51)
Policy 43 on Tenant Rights. The AMM has strong reservations
with respect to establishing housing courts and does not believe
that sufficient data and information has been provided to justify
this recommendation or this policy.
16. Housing Review Guidelines. (pages 19-30)
-General housing review guidelines. All "reviews" cost money
and therefore the committee questions if this set of review
guidelines is necessary for projects and proposals within the
MUSA. The AMM believes that the factors to be considered in
this section will be considered elsewhere in the other sets of
review guidelines. If the Council does keep this set of
review guidelines, however, we do offer several concerns and
comments.
-page 2. the AMM committee believes that the Met Council
should not review projects for internal consistency with
local comp plans. The review should be cond.cted to
determine consistency with regional plans and etc.(see
general concern 5.)
-page 2. Guidelines for Accessibility of Cervices and
Facilities. The AMM believes the paragraphs pertaining to
schools need to be modified extensively. Cities have no
control over school closings and this statement could be at
odds with desegregation guidelines in force for central
cities. Also, the distances for walking and bussing, etc.
should be checked to see if they are consistent with the
guidelines established by the State Board of Education.
-page 26. Highway accessibility and Design, etc. The AMM does
not object to the statement but wants to note that compliance
with these guidelines could add to housing costs.
17. Subsidized housing review guidelines. (pages 31-38)
-Special needs. The AMM believes this criterion may be premature
since the ;d)a1wgJ 1 ' is recommending that a study be donthdLimo-a i
determine the- ttandd.•capped housing needs. hmn&--r
-In Conflict Recommendations. (page 33) The AMM does not
support the inclusion of C.1 because of its concerns with the
Community Index concept. (See General Concern 1.).
-Design Features. (page 37). and Capabilities of Housing,
Sponsor (page 36). The AMM does not feel the Council is
staffed to evaluate "design features" or the "capabilities of
the Housing Sponsor". Also the "design" and "sponsor" oft^,i
change after the Council has completed its review.
18. Community Development Review Guidelines
( paE;e 39 ) The AMM
-n -
recommends eliminating the reference to the Community Index.
(See General Concern 1.).
19. Local Comprehe:,sjie Plan Housing Element Review Guidelines.
(pages 40-45) '7he AMM is concerned about combining Central
Cities, MUSA Communities and Freestanding cities into one set
of guidelines. There is so much difference in concerns and
existing conditions that we question if one set of generic
criteria can deal with all issues adequately.
20. Local Housing Bond Plan Review Guidelines. (pages 46-49). The AMM
reiterates its recommendation that Housing Revenue Bond
projects and proposals originating with the MHFA be submitted
for review to the Metropolitan Council and local communities
to assure consistency with regional and local plans.
21. Community Index. (pages 54-65) General Concern 1 contains the
AMM's major concern and recommendation with respect to the
Community Index. There are also some technical type concerns
with respect to the index. A partial listing includes:
-Communities split by the MUSA line may be penalized because of
high value of houses (large lot estates) already in existence
outside the MUSA.
-The same house might have different values in different areas
due to intangible factors.
-Market Place influence on housing style types and costs.
COUNCIL MEETING
NOV 2 G 1984
CITY OF ORONO
associallion of
mu niriPa 11 1l ie 5
MEETING NOTICE
November 9, 1984
TO: AMM Member Cities
(Mayors, Managers/Administrators)
FROM: Ronald J. Backes, AMM Fresident
General Meeting of the AMM Membership
to Consider and Adopt
AMM Legislative Policies for 1985
Date: Thursday, December 6, 1984
Time: 7:30 P.M.
Location: Richfield Ci`y hall
Council Chamut;s
6700 Portland Ave.
Richfield, Minnesota
Agenda
1. Call to order.
2. Announcements and review of voting procedures.
3. Consideration and Adoption of the AMM's proposed 1985
Legislative Policies as recommended by the Legislztive Policy
Committees and as approved by the Board of Directors.
4. Other business.
5. Adjournment.
PLEASE NOTE:
A. Copies cf the proposed Leg.slative Policies are included in
the mailing to the Managers/Administrators and we would ask
that they be distributed to Mayors and Councilmembers.
B. We would hope that every city would have one or more
representatives in attendance at this very important
meeting.
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE SCHOOL BOARD
OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278
HELD ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 22, 1984
The regular meeting of the School Board of Independent School District No. 278
was held on Monday. October 22, 1984.
Present: Dave McKown James Franklin James Seiter
Don Anderson William Levering William Fenholt
Kitty Crosby
Absent: Reuben Palo
UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Jim Franklin, the minutes of the
October 9, 1984 regular meeting were approved as presented.
Jir Franklin reported to the Board on the Parent Meet Z Confer meeting held on
OcL;)Ler 15 and the PER Committee meeting held on October 17.
Athletic Director, Leo Goslin, and coaches Greg Eldred and Da•!e Sohn attended
the meeting to present their proposal allowing 7th and 8th grade wrestlers to
participate on the high school wrestling team according to the ,following cri-
teria:
COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF ORONO
October 22, 1984 School Bard Meeting
MIUU rot DQ'1.MWATICIP s
1. Ttis wrestli" teas will consist of trades seven through twelve.
2. gel too of the participants will be bys
A. Sequent of the student involved in wrestling.
3. Ability i skill of the wrestler.
3. The wrestler selected will used parental consent before he can wrestle
with the tigb School tans.
♦. The seventh i eighth grade wrestling teas ( C Squad ), whenever possible.
will wrestle their dual vets at the sass time as the J.q, teas.
S. The wrestlers chosen to wrestle with the Aigb Sebool two any challenge
a amber of the J.V. or Varsity for that Individual's position.
IINMTS s
1. This will create greater seventh i eigbth grade involvement with the
ash school tease.
2. Develop the ability of wrestlers that are more advanced than their pears.
3. The wrestler will gain experience at a higher level of competition.
♦. The wrestler will learn and develop greater skills %bile practicing
with older and more experienced teammates.
S. more enthusiasm will be generated towards the sport of wrestling now and
In the future.
Discussion ensued regarding the policy adopted by the Board on July 9, 1984,
which allowed a 7th or dth grader to participate on the high school level but
with specific guidelines as to the number of students allowed to "move up" into
high school sports. Bil' Levering stated he felt the wrestling proposal now
being presented was not in accordance with the policy previously adopted as the
proposal would in effect be making 7th and 8th grade wrestling a part of the
high school program. Mr. Levering felt the proposal should be reconstructed in
accordance with the policy or the policy should be re-evaluated.
After lengthy discussion, Don Anderson MOVED, Jim Franklin seconded, to
establish the wrestling program as a 6 year high school program from grades 7 -
12, on a one year basis. Nay: Kitty Crosby and Bill Levering. Motion carried.
Bill Fenholt reported that a form will be filed which wi,l give Orono the right
to participate in an Asbestos Class Action Suit which was filed in New York City
on behalf of all school districts in the nation.
Discussion ensued regarding the development of criteria for the elementary
report card. Thoughts that developed from this discussion were: 1) narrative
is very valuable, 2) the report card should be for both parent ana child, and
should maximize the educational eAperience, 3) the report card should build
self-esteem and promote confidence as it reflects the development of skills
which enable one to perform to his/her fullest ability, and 4) the report card
should relay how the child is learning and functioning according to his/her own
ability to produce. The consensus of the Board was that additional thought
should be given to developing this criteria and this item will again be placed
on the Agenda on November 12.
Bill Fenholt updated the Board on the negotiations with the cooks. The next
negotiations meeting will be held on October 23 at 2:00 p.m.
Jim Seiter commented on the Bylaws for the Orono Education Fund committee. He
stated that these bylaws were developed as simply an instrument to govern the
committee in accordance with the original policies approved by the Board.
The Board directed administration to refer any fundraising programs to the Orono
Education Fund committee for perusal and possible coordination of fundraising
activities.
UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Jim Franklin, the 1984-86 Custodial
Master Contract was approved as presented.
The Teacher Meet b Confer meeting will be held on Thursday, November 1, 1984 at
4:15 p.m.
Bill Fenholt informed the Board that the roof of the Maple Plain School had been
inspected and there are some problem areas that need to be repaired. The con-
sensus of the Board was to proceed with those repairs.
UPON MOTION by Bill levering, seconded by Jim Franklin, the bills as covered by
vouchers 046024 through 046100 and 045353 through 045409 were approved as
presented.
UPON MOTION by Bill levering, seconded by Kitty Crosby, the meeting wis
adjourned.
Kath r e ros y, erk
Approved:
hV �
sue---- _
Dave McKown, iairrman
COUNCIL MEETING!
o
NOV ::i; 'yE4
To: Schumann Elementary Pzincipal. 6 Tea
d � OF ORON4
From: Officer Steve Pearson
Subject: Officer Friendly Program Phase I
As you know, phase one of the Officer Friendly
Program was completed during the first week of Octo-
ber. It has been some time since I last solicited
your written comments and suggestions. Please take a
couple minutes and give me as much feedback as you can.
I think the program is going very well. I would like
to thank all of you for your support of the program.
TEACHERS NAME C.
GRADE_
l) What are your general thoughts about the police dog
presentation?
�,.�T --� -�-�.,� � ��, � ►-��� , Imo- ,�� v�l 1
2) Do you feel that it was worthwhile to skip sc)me of
the traditional phase one topics th'_s year so that we
could fit the K-9 demonstration in?
�fo
) I am constantly trying ;.o vary the progi am for the
PH06fiflaids and this gets harder to do each year. The K-9 demo -
was one way which varied he program. Can you sugge,-t
any other examples which could be used to enhance the
program?
"Officer Frieruf!y is a reQrstered trademark of The Sear Roebuck Found i.orl "Qtfree± Frren0ly" programs ire
sponsored by cooperatsro public• private, paroeRial schools and thou «spec% .e pol" and/or sheriff e
_ r .. ... ..►_ ., n rer,nn woh The Srra:s ftnehutk Foundat,on" ._
ID
4
h
To: Sch nn Elementary Principal i Teachers
DFrom: Officer Steve Pearson
Subjeft: Officer Friendly Program Phase I
As you know, phase one of the Ifficer Friendly
Program was completed during the first week of Octo-
ber. It has been some time since I last solicited
your written comments and suggestions. Please take a
couple minutes and give me as much feedback as you can.
I think the program is going very well. I would like
to thank all of you for your support of the program.
9
TEACHERS NA:'E_-
GRADE_�_
1) What are your general thoughts about the police dog
presentation?
2) Do '+you feel that it was worthwhile to skip some of
the traditional phase one topical 'this year so that we
coule. fit the K-9 demons•.ration in?
Q
3) I am constantly trying to vary the program for the
PRO680D&. ids and this gets harder to do eayear. The K-9 demo -
was one way which varied the program. Can you su99est
any other examples which could be used to enhance the
program?
.uffan I §WV0V*" a s MVSWod aadMWk oI TFr Seen- peat d Fwindoion "O"lew FfK -'*v" O«MK of NM
nr rnCW*1AVnq puNic. Pfiv@49, P*r0r W 5th"k and #W'f ►9W.C1w. PW'C* «•. a sn.��t�
,r D
To: Schuman tmentary Principal 6 Teachers
From: Officer L ve Pearson
Subject: Officer Friendly Program Phase I
As you know, phase one of the Officer Friendly
Program was completed during the first week of Octo-
ber. It has been some time since I last solicited
your written comments and suggestions. Please take a
couple minutes and give me as much feedback as you can.
I think the program is going very well. I would like
to thank all of you for your support- of the program.
TEACHERS NAME_
GRADE
1) What are your general thoughts about the police dog
nresentation3 l
2) Do you feel that it was worthwhile to skip some of
the traditional phase one topics this year so that we
could fit the K-9 demonstratio.i in?
CRC
) 1 am constantly trying to vary the program for the
PR06881"Rids and this gets harder to do each year. The K-9 demo -
was one way which varied the program. Can you suggest
any other examples which could be used to enhance the
program?
"oftrtar Frtendly is a reg+stsred trademark of The Sears Roetiuck Foundatror, "Officer Friendly" progtal'- ;,rr
Wonsorad by cooperating public, private, parochial schools and their reWKtwe police and/or sherrft
departments throughout the nation, in cooperation with The Seats Roetx,c► Foundat.on "
D
To: Schumann Elementary Pri.,,_ipal & Teachers
DFrom: Officer Steve Pearson
Subject: Officer Friendly Program Phase I
As you know, phase one of the Officer Friendly
Program was completed during the first week of Octo-
ber. It has been some time since I last solicited
your written comments and suggestions. Please take a
couple minutes and give me as much feeriback as you can.
I think the program is going very well. I would like
to thank all of ou for your support of the program.
TEACHERS NAME O'O
GRADE •
1) Wn t are your general thoughts about the police dog
presentation? I't ��� .i�% •
2) Do you feel that it was worthwhile to skip some of
the traditional phase one topics this year so that we
could fit the K-9 demonstration in? WA
V.40 J*&C
I am constantly trying to vary the program for the
PROGROUids and this gets harder to do each year. The K-9 demo -
was one way which varied the program. Can you suggest
any other examples which could be used to enhance the
program? `� #W'
`� p,� •� •
• q� .�.� �..�
f "Owc F &Aps a tie ztr•ret Videalk of The buck Found& f r�f
thti #=Id
e.1 44 police and of then}!
c__., 13 ._. , ...L r_.._._...... ,.
D
To: Schl lementary Principal & Teachers
OFrom: Officer •Steve Pearson
•Subject: Officer Friendly Program Phase I
As you know, phase one of the Officer Friendly
Program was completed during the first week of Octo-
ber. It has been some time since I last solicited
your written comments and suggestions. Please take a
couple minutes and give me as much feedback as you can.
I think the program is going very wellI would like
to thank all of yo for your support of. the program.
TEACHERS NAME
GRLADE��
1) What are your general thoughts about the police dog
presentation? '� ��.1�Q ai .,�
(�'�C� �.�..�-� � `^ .•..cam �
�) Do you feel that it was worthwhile to skip some of
the traditional phase one topics this year so that we
could fit the K-9 demonstration in?
110)
3) I am constantly trying to vary the program for the
PROGROMkids and this gets harder to do each year. The K-9 demo -
was one way which varied the program. Can you sugget t
any other examples which could be used to enhance the
program? �J /
j,j U
"O"Ww F.imft• jo, MonvW ws*wwrk or flee Sean-•Rotbuck Foundation. "O"aw Frien0y" wowaM NO
q M o"pwathy pudic, private, parochial school• vW their r6ctwa polka Ww/or "ri"
D
To: Sch nn Elementary Principal 6 Teachers
DFrom: Officer Steve Pearson
Subject: Officer Friendly Program Phase I
As you know, phase one of the Officer Friendly
Program Was completed during the first week of Octo-
ber. It has been some time since I last solicited
1
your written comments and suggestions. Please take a
couple minutes and give me as much feedback as you can.
I think the program is going very well. I would like
to thank ail of you for your support of the program.
TEACHERS NAME_
GRADE
1) What are your general tho�uyahts about the police dog
presentation? -1 "T pink. I h�It �� W4S � hG Of �he,
be t--cr A•V fOnit"N
o h 9 rade IGvti� easy u nd`rs�-a.,�/.
2) Do you feel that it was worthwhile to skip some of
the traditional phase one topics this year so that we
could fit the K-9 demonstration in? T-F t�G D��L�
r —
t
do its erta-f'�on was tke, k -9 max rat
• .I �P w�Kll sa eS — sk; f�c �
f r4 ' �furse. 'd �t�o��l
. 3) I am constantly trying to vary the program for the
PROGRO
G ids and this gets harder to do each year. The K-9 demo -
was one way which varied the program. Can you suggest
any other examples which could be used to enhance the
program? no-- at t'h/,se
"Officer Friendly" is a registered trademark of The Sears- Roebuck Foundation. "01111 er Friendly" programs are
sponsored by cooperating pvUic, prwate, parochial schools and their retpKtiva PON" a W1W etsftriff
To: Schumann Elementary Principal Teachers
V From: Officer Steve Pearson
Subject: Officer Friendly Program Phase I
As you know, phase one of the Officer Friendly
Program was completed during the first week of Octo-
ber. It has been some time since I last solicited
your written comments and suggestions. Please take a
couple minutes and give me as much feedback as you can.
I think the program is going very well. I would like
to thank all of you for your support of the program.
TEACHERS �INAME
GRADE
1) What are your general thoughts about the police dog
presentation?
2) Do you feel that it was worthwhile to skip some of
the traditional phase one topics this year so that we
could fit the K-9 demonstration in?
c'-
PROUR3) I am constantly trying to vary the program, for the
Mkids and this gets harder to do each year. The K-9 demo -
was one way which varied the program. Can you suggest
any other examples which could be used to enhance the
program?
"Officer Friandiy" is a registt• rademark of The Sears—Ruebuck Fuundation ''Officer Friendly" programs are
sponsored by cooperating public, private, parochial schools and the, iespect�ve police and/or sheriff
4-- +ti• .d•�,r M.a rr�rlptr af,On With Th• Gar,,_ ROCCN,C► F n ,•
p
t.
To: Schumann Elementary Principal & Teachers
From: officer Steve Pearson
Subject: Officer Friendly Program Phase I
As you know, phase one of the Officer Friendly
Program was completed during the first week of Octo-
ber. It has been some time since I last solicited
your written comments and suggestions. Please take a
couple minutes and give me as much feedback as you can.
I think the program is going very well. I would like
to thank all of you for your support of the program.
TEACHERS NAME" -
GRADE
1) What are your general thoughts about the police dog
presentation?
416441 /tt cite tt. C�
2) Do you feel that it was worthwhile to sipf some of
the traditional phase one topics this year so that we
could fit the K-9 de:ncrstration 4 n -r-r�-
je 44,' /
,,OG"A4-
) 1 am constantly trying to vary the program for the
PROOROBids and this gets harder to do each year. The K-9 demo -
was one way which varied the program. Can you suggest
any other examples which could be used to enhannc.+eythe4.,.lG..•✓
program? t 4 .6•sf rc a.-' .?• .�✓ -c,>v► .� •
�� C;• Kt-ia1� ��rC/.� .fib-�/t� �I�- �I,L�, c-cam .lc•�l r'l•
-00
,,cam .l .� _ � �. •ti•J¢ .
.�-J 4�44d / (1 l ( .[�iu s 'r' ,�[ �_. r
"Officer FrZy" is a mitered uadreryfk of The Sean—Rwbuek Fow�d�tion..•Offiar Pfi�1►" PeM
sponsored by cooperative public• private, parochial whoop and their respective police ane� �d/or dh`
_---- -- ---- _ .. a e.."_ste&huek Foundation." P4 ; 1 `"✓
To: Schumann Elementary Principal & Teachers
DFrom: Officer Steve Pearson
Subject: Officer Friendly Program Phase I
As you know, phase one of the Officer Friendly
Program was completed during the first week of Octo-
ber. It has been some time since I last solicited
your written comments and suggestions. Please take a
couple minutes and give me as much feedback as you can.
I think the program is going very well. I would like
to thank all of youforyour support of the program.
TEACHERS NAME Z--
G RAD E c;-
1) What are your eneral thoughts about the police dog
presentation? 1 L-�
1
2) Do you feel that it was worthwhile to skip some of
the traditional phase one topics this year so that we
could fit the K-9 demonstration in? L11")
U
n I artl col
trying to vary the program for the
PROURMI) ids and this gets harder to do each year. The K-9 demo -
was one way which varied the program. Can you suggest
any other examples which could be used to enhance the
program? r
_kit 0 . �.
"Ottscer Fr,er.dly" is a regStered trademark of The Sears- Roebuck Foundation "Officer Friendly" programs are
sponsored by cooperating public, private, parcw.hral schools and their respective ponce and'or shentf
departments thrcwghuut the nation, in cooperation with The Sears--Roebocc Foundation "
D
To: Schumann Elementary Principal b Teachers
DFrom: Officer Steve Pearson
Subject: Officer Friendly Program Phase I
As you know, phase one of the Officer Friendly
Program was completed during the first week of Octo-
ber. It has been some time since I last solicited
your written comments and suggestions. Please take a
couple minutes and give me as much feedback as you can.
I think the program is going very well. I would like
to thank all of you pr your support of the program.
TEACHERS NAME�"-
GRADE��-�
1) What are your general thoughts about the police dog
presentation? 1
2) Do you feel that it was worthwhile to skip some of
the traditional phase one topics this year so that we
could fit the K-9 demonstration in?
�_/ r
U
) I am constantly trying to vary the program for the
PRO60filwids and this -; I-.s harder to do each year. The K-9 demo -
was one way which varied the program. Can you suggest
any other examples which could be used to ent,ance the
program?
"Officer Friendly" is a ragrstered trademark of The Sears Roebuck Foundation. ,Officer Friendly" Programs are
sponsored by cogwratrnS public, Private. )afochial schools and then r*%Wlive police and/or sheriff
departments throughout the nalmn, in cooperation with The Sears —Roebuck Foundation '
0
To: Schumann Elementary Principal & Teachers
From: Officer Steve Pearson
Subject: Officer Friendly Program Phase I
As you know, phaLe one of the Officer Friendly
Program Was completed during th- first week of Octo-
ber. It has been some time since I last solicited
your written comments and suggestions. Please take a
couple minutes and give me as much feedback as you can.
I think the program is going very well. I would like
to thank all of you for your support of the program.
TEACHERS NAME —In"
GRADE �S
1) Wh t,-are your general thoughts about the police dog
pre tion?
1 _
2) Do you feel that it was worthwhile to skip some of
the traditional phase one topics this year so that we
cold fit the K-9 demonstration in?
J
HOGUE& I am constantly trying to vary the program for the
and this gets harder to do each year. The K-9 demo -
was one way which varied the program. Can you sugges`
any other examples which could be used to enhance the
program?
"Officer Friendly" is a registered tradernark of The Sears —Roebuck Foundation. "Otfiter Friend!, Prova a,e
sponsored by cooperating public, private, parochial schools and their respective police and ", she,,f!
D
To: Schumann Elementary Principal & Teachers
DFrom: Officer Steve Pearson_
Subject: Officer Friendly Program Phase I
D
iRl
As you know, phase one of the Officer Friendly
Program was completed during the first week of Octo-
ber. It has been some time since I last solicited
your written comments and suggestions. Please.take a
couple minutes and give me as much feedback as you can.
I think the program is going very well. I would like
to thank all of you for your support of the program.
TEACHERS NAME�l.�
GRADE -3
1) What are your general thoughts about the police dog
presentation? d,�,�
2) Do you feel that it was worthwhile to skip some of
the traditional phase one topics this year s^ that we
could fit the K-9 demonstration _— D?
�oG�f�j3) I am constantly trying to vary the program for the
l�cids and this gets harder to do each year. The K-9 demo -
was one way which varied the program. Can you suggest
any other examples which could be used to enhance the
Of az
th_ �X 1,441-�- llfi4vy
f nendly is n vy •iered trademark of The Seers -Roebuck Foundation- "Officer Friendly" programs are
s[?onsored by cooperating public. Private, parochial schools and their respective police and/or shenH
_ �1.n'rm•. •. �� . ,,,� „r _ih% nrt,nn.Iny plltli4 _with The Sears- Roebuck Foundation."
r D
To: Schumann Elementary Principal 6 Teachers
DFrom: Officer Steve Pearson
Subject: Officer Friendly Program Phase I
As you know, phase one of the Officer Friendly
Program was completed during the first week of Octo-
ber. It has been some time since I last solicited
your written comments and suggestions. Please take a
couple minutes and give me as much feedback as you can.
I think the program is going very well. I would like
to thank all of you for your support of the program.
TEACHERS NAME f �:.
GRADE INQR
1) What are your general thoughts about the police dog
presentation?
D Z" t,
4Ao&cjA4 was exc�//t�f.
k rpA , �eA A Id
e Li4 t' r d ,-n4/e f-r
2) Do you feel iat it was worthwhile to skip some of
the traditional phase one topics this year so that we
could fit " e K-9 demonstration in-.
Lie,
W o r� t,J h i �`° • J
CR)
P006001'WI am constantly trying to vary the program for the
ids and this gets harder to do each year. The K-9 demo -
was one way which varied the program. Can you suggest
any other e:_,uples which could be used to enhance the
program) reil;,7emier ,t7r91A) Gcrs A a c
yoK olf 'OL duo o� �/l c cot k��o.ne-/
And YpKr ikrw�0l-m Alt was UGr�
�/7Atresll Y4r C 5V14de-" fs ,
M �j / e � ie �S3 A� ariseA
"Officer Fnendt' rs+ r , k4d dtrnark OVk. $ears Rcxck ouffdatron off cer Fr,andi� / wuyrams are
sponsored by cooperating public, private, parochial schools and their respective police and,'or sheriff
departments throughout the nation, in cooperation with The sears_Roebuck Foundation
OTT]( D
To: Schumann Elementary Principal 6 Teachers
From: Officer Steve Pearson
Subject: Officer Friendly Program Phase I
As you know, phase one of the Officer Friendly
Program was completed during the first week of Octo-
ber. It has been some time since I last solicited
your written comments and suggestions. Please take a
e couple minutes and give mas much feedback as you can.
I think the program is going very well. I would like
to thank all of you for your support of the program.
TEACHERS NAME -/ I�
GRADE_
1) What are your general thoughts about the police dog
presentation? _
2) Do you feel that it was worthwhile to skip some of
the traditional phase one topics this year so that we
could fit the K-9 demonstration. in?
Rj
Pn 3) I am constantly trying to vary the program for the
Q G B Uids and this gets harder to do each year. The K-9 demo -
was one way which varied the program. Can you suggest
any other examples which could be used to enhance the
program?
"01hcer F•rendly" is a registered tradernork of The Seers -Roebuck Foundation "0fticer Friendly" programs we
sponsored by cooperating puMre, private, parochiel schools and theirrespective police and/w sheriff
.
D
To: Schumann Elementary Principal & Teachers
From: Officer Steve Pearson
Subject: Officer Friendly Program Fhase I
As you know, phase one of the 'Ifficer Friendly
Program was completed during the first week of Octo-
ber. It has been some time since I last solicited
your written comments and suggestions. Please take a
couple minutes and give me as much feedback as you can.
I think the program is going very well. I would like
to thank all of you //for your support of the program.
TEACHERS NAME___•
GRADE `f
1) What are your general thoughts about the police dog
presentation?
D
2) Do you feel that it was worthwhile to skip some of
the traditional phase one topics this year so that we
could fit the K-9 demonstration in?
�R)
PR06ROM3) I am constantly trying to vary the program for the
kids and this gets harder to do each year. The K-9 demo -
was one way which varied the program. Can you suggest
any other examples which could be used to enhance the
program?
"Officer Friendly" s a registered trxlernark of The Sears -Roebuck Foundation "Officer Friendly" programs are
sponsored by cooperating public, private, parochial schools and the-r resPeCtrtre Pot" and,'or sheriff
ttlfMUahm Y rho natrnrt in nnnM. hnn a h Th. a,-
----- C_.._.�,3,_. _ !!r L. 4at_ . Rnta.►>,rck Fmrndatton
To: Schumarn Elementary Principal & Teachers
OFrom: Office Ateve Pearson
Subject: OfficcL Friendly Program Phdse I
V
(R)
As you know, phase one of the Officer Friendly
Program was completed during the first week of Octo-
ber. It has been some time since I last solicited
your written comments and suggestions. Please take a
couple minutes and give me as much feedback as you can
I think the program is going very well. I would like
to thank all of you for your support of the program.
TEACHERS NAME
GRADE
1) What are your general thoughts about the police dog
presentation?
2) Do you feel that it was worthwhile to skip some of
the traditional phase one topics this year so that we
could fit the K-9 de:ttonstration
PROGHM3)
I am constantly
trying
to vary the program for the
kids and this gets
harder
to do each year. The K-9 demo -
was one way which
varied
the program. Can you suggest
any other examples
which
could be used to renhdnce the
program?
"Officer friendly- is a req,starerf Trademark of The Srars Roehuck Foundation "Office, Fi,encJ1y , programs are
_.,. Vo2nvq td PV. C--4Wrairn9 PVW*c, P-81r. Paruct)4 schoAs and their resmc1111e onlfc* AWWJ." "O""ff
ri
D
To: Schumann Elementary Principal & Teachers
From: Officer Steve Pearson
Subject: Officer Friendly Program Phase I
As you know, phase one of the Officer Friendly
Program was completed during the first week of Octo-
ber. It has been some time since I last solicited
your written comments and suggestions. Please take a
couple minutes and give me as much feedback as you can.
I thin); the program is going very well. I would like
to thank all of you for your
support of the program.
TEACHERS NAME
GRADE 0 A)
1) What are your general thoughts about the police dog_
presentation?
2) Do you feel that it was worthwhile to skip some of
the traditional phase one topics this year so that we
could fit the K-9 demonstration in? 4Y.4_
-
V(Cff_��)
PB06Rflffl3) I am constantly trying to vary the program for the
111cids and this gets harder to do each year. The K-9 demo -
was one way which varied the program. Can you suggest
any other exampleF which could be used to enhance the
program?
'Officer Friendly" is a registered trademark of The Sears - Roebuck Foundation "Officer Friendly ' Programs are
sponsored by cooperating public, private, paroch,al schools and their respective police and'or sheriff
th—'ru —1 rh. —1— — r,....,.—r..,.. —th Tha Saari-Flnetxrrk Frunelat— "
HEATHERCROFT
7GL[ N f[[7
•KNDtn IRDN YONVY[Nt
K"W" SHOW ARE ASSUMED
GORDON R. COFFIN Co., INC.
ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS
LOW LANE, MINNESOTA
_ nb r .! ,�. y a_ M,n .r ar a,Pwn.�.•r�r a,r V �r r� _y yr, ar _, w W a
rr �. w .. � r r w,a.... r,�w . r r ...• ,.w r .r,_a. ,. ,i ,,.u,
wrW�Mv �� rrw. wad
�aY ra^r. rr ara arw •n _ ra fir. w a,ue .,_rn r _ ,rrr _ �w•„r•�•,a,a : r u. r-
��w—ina
_r•,sr• .,�•• ���n �� w�T.r� yr _
�. s r•�•i ,.•arrt. _ _ M
PO J. Z C /ter
F x e r, U41 0 ve
d �s�ussed �
Mf�,t�n9
led �n
it po &OP4
are 116 W
uftk luiA 1
-b iDbf�
dOtUMP, A+S.
r000 �2S
Clerk as
- �Fhose
� 00+ pubs �c.
�r�orM��h'en i
L