The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutProject PacketK/ 5t)C1 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 Pei ($50.00 per each additional varia Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original applicant After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee) -------------------------------------------------------- --- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address IPA Property Identification Number (P.I.D. ) �' ��a•'�� "` Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Phone (home) 411.16(b=• Name ly Phone (work) 9LA' 1 1 S` _ Address:=1#,"City:• Zip:_ Sfu OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) Name JW Me VLWO Phone (work) S41.1S0� Address: 5M HW 94151m lmCity: MM. Zip: 7WRZL Date Property Acquired§T(month/year) I (do) (dot) also own the adjacent parcels of land. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ DRSCRIPTION OF RRQURST Estimated Construct+on Cost S Describe request in detail: ` 00 *a-"" � WIN 1, --------------------------------------------------------------------------- VARIANCRS RRQUIRRD Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances ( Fro t Muo- Sid& Rear) Other � � HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: $1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions reve ting compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: m --------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain, this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center: 348-3271). 3. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of sur,,ey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views. 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A woRxl*G COPY (110 X 170 OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. ------••-------------------------------------------------------------------- The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above infors tion has not been included. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Certification by Clerical Department that Variance Application is complete. Initialed by Clerical Staff: Date -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true an r ct to a est of his/her knowledge. )V Applicant's Signature ` Date N IL "Ot� 0 OWKXRS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga- tion rnd verification of this requesl.4 Owner's Signature _ ��''� ' ! '` * ., Date -------------- --------- --------- ----- ----------------------------------- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building i Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. CITY OF ORONO NOTICE w� The pia^n,ng Commission *,It hold D' o"5 I hearings ,n the Coun� Monday oell tl 1990 South Brown Road on canons to review Ine 3 MOk Pierce Of U&OOfa^ I No 1553 M e pfIve seeks a he,ght variance for entrance monuments and an electric pate *,thin the front street yard of the property eme^tt of a680 Nu 1554 t,mo1 y North Arm 0nve seeks a,Ot area vansnce and tilde setback to rebu,,d a new residence en a^ existing toundatiun 3 No 1556 Gerald Neuon °na ticovewas ports Road seeks apWO,a, a +once to enclose an a■.swig 3 s,ded recessed area or the existing Iesrdence and Roberta , No ! 559 and 158o Jo tMrnk n Of d 1:5 H,g,,%OOd Road seek appfov',1 nr tl'ch Of &r and average lakeshore setback varlahces r°r the Installation Of a pool Within the IakeshOfC ye"d dnd a :Ond+tionM use Wf' rent 10 pern'1 cerl B+n,dno allefdtipns In excea8 of the allOa c'1 f(10,,•t,,C rd'OS dwUl,Mg iris,&' t 1041n,�n; v.alg satin^ O c` 3820 Cherry 5 NO 156f Chnahn2 Back O•a, a' a ldkesh 0% setback Avenue seeks apC ' ,k„P{,tlp aeck ., tnP earns ' � drC ��1l,.dpd C.P, an are.f allead:.•i ucued Va. res'denf., '.dnU`Pr F h.;" •5C: Jd:• anti be.e"` G• nfl."Onal ! No•'•' S"ee Rudd seek a co �•• en[es.0• Ine rrsiallatiOn Of use• her*, • r.. •w.In., a designated wef ., .. ..•er'e and Jere, Dent&, °' w' 1 k, ,• •uv . appr0, a, Of a side ,A"..nces pr�aeo ca .2? de'd:'ned 9dfage to De located adhtn the street yard 01 lheu lakeshore pf0De"Y Anderson of 6 No 1565 Leesa and Richer' ! r the 3205 Crystal Bay Road have bled an a to act hardcover variance to, a Lakeside akesi a mead constructed without a oJ'ld'ng permit applied 10, sale setbackand hard ddton have cover variances the deck. Weeto DO proposed porch and sun room add,hon to the &%,sting residencer Thomas Req^'er and of g No 1586 or AvenM seat, approval of a side e street Elmwood setback variance for a proposed ad d,bon to 1he e.,slmg residence 156, Robert and LouAnn Powell J 10 No r of 2916 Casco Pont Road seek epD'oval Of an ,,,rage lakeshore selbaCk ,arlance'or x pro posed deck 10 be{Installed at the lat,es+de Of the existing residence f 11 No 1566 James and Jud'n P,erppnt o 18p1 Nest Farm Roacondtanal use perm' for setback v 8^d the conversion 01 an &■,sting Darn ,MO ,n ,n depend-, quest house unit n the owner Of 112 No 1569 Sam McG°u Say an undeveloped property,, of ,front Yed ard set Sid, Road seeks aPPf oval o a residence back variance for a orOpO�d All pe•sons w,sn,ng Io be heard *,it appear at th,s time The meeting starts at 7 00 P in vynnen cOmrf1en11 ale so c.ted Plains are avail able 'Of fev,fw ,n it'* c,ty Offices 0y so Mniment C'r 04 Orono m+ 51+0^ 9> p,annmq Co Jeanne A Maoust• BuJdmg b ion'ng A imrnlstiato• IPub^tined In Tne lak!' and P'oree• Julv.= logo Affidavit of Publication State of Minnesota, Countv of Hennepin Bill Holm, being duly sworn, on oath says that he is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER. Mound, Min- nesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: A.) The newspaper has complied with all the require- ments constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07• and other applicable laws, as amended. f B 1 The printed —Ad which Is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each weer, for_ successive weeks: It was first published Monday. the day of t 9t t. and was thereafter prints and p blished every" Monday. to and including Monday. the ____ day of _ Authorized Agent . CUNTV ! V• •. ,. ill'•. _s )�lif� Subscribed and sworn to me on this - day of- ( t9 c By ir�'f It , �L[GIIL Notary Public Rate Informatflon west clatvned rate paid by COrft"WLIaf uAars IV Campa•a ble space 09 80 per Inch Ma%Imu . rate at+Owed Cy taw lot above mailer $9 a0 ilat iris^ 3 Rafe actually chafged to, above matter $5 20 Pw W40& Each addttlolml successive +48e1! $3 38 per "C" w CERTIFICATE OF NAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO ) I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1569, was mailed to the attached list of property owners . In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 29th day of June, 1990. Ja i Bosma CITY OF ORONO - NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Council Chambers at 1275 South Brown Road on Monday, July 16, 1990 to review the following land use applications: 1. #1553 Mike Pierce of 480 Deborah Drive seeks a height variance for entrance monuments and an electric gate within the front street yard of the property. 2. #1554 Timothy R. Gramentz of 4680 North Arm Drive seekb a lot area variance and side setback to rebuild a new residence on an existing foundation. 3. #15`_)6 Gerald Nelson of 1629 Bohns Point Road seeks approval of a hardcover variance to enclose an existing 3-sided recessed area of the existing residence. 4. #1559 & #1560 John and Roberta Henrich of 4125 Highwood Road seek approval of hardcover and average lakeshore setback variances for the installation of a pool within the lakeshore yard and a conditional use permit to permit certain land alterations in excess of the allowed 100 cubic yards involving installation of retaining walls. 5. #1561 Christine Beck of 3820 Cherry Avenue seeks approval of a lakeshore setback variance for the extension of a lakeside deck to be extended over an area already occupied by the principal residence. 6. #1562 Jack and Beverly Grundhofer of 581 North Stream Road seek a conditional use permit and variance for the installation of a dock structure located within a designated wetland. 7. $1563 Maurene and Jerry Denzel of 1295 Elmwood Avenue seek approval of a side setback and hardcover variances for a proposed 24'x28' detached garage to be located within the street yard of their lakeshore property. 8. #1565 Leesa and Richard Anderson of 3205 Crystal Bay Road have filed an after -the -fact hardcover variance for a lakeside deck constructed without a building permit and in addition have applied for side setback and hardcover variances for a proposed extension of the deck, screen porch and sun room addition to the existinq residence. 9. $1566 Dr. & Mrs. Thomas Regnier of 1205 Elmwood Avenue seek approval of a side street setback variance for a proposed addition to the existing residence. 10. #1567 Robert and LouAnn Powell, Jr. of 2916 Casco Point Road seek approval of an average lakeshore setback variance for a proposed deck to he instal .led at the lakes ide of the existing residence. v Notice June 26, 1990 Page 2 11. 11568 James and Judith Pierpont of 1801 West Farm Road seek approval of a side setback variance and conditional use permit for the conversion of an existing barn into an independent guest house unit. 12. 11569 Sam McCloud, the owner of an undeveloped property located at 4280 Bayside Road, seeks approval of a f-.ant yard setback variance for a proposed residence. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. The meeting starts at 7:00 PM. Written comments are solicitet'. Plans are available for review in the City offices by appointment. City of Orono By: Planning Commission Jelinne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator To be published the week of July 2, 1990. To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Jeanne A. Mahusth, Building & Zonirq Administrator Date: July 13, 1990 Subject: #1569 Sam McCloud, 4280 Bayside Rcad - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-1A Pertinent Ordinances & Special Issues to be Addressed for this Review - 1. Secti- 0.27, Subdivision 5 (A) a) Area: Required = 5 acres Existing = 6.5 acres (contiguous dry land above 935 elevation) b) Front/Street Setback: Required = 100' Prul osed = 68' Variance = 32' or 32% c) Height of structure to be confirmed at your meeting. A�tlicant has not included elevations of structure. Staff does not foresee a troblem as this is a one story walk -out structure. 2. Section 10.27, Subdivision 4 (A) - 3. Section 10.02, Definition - Animal unit and Section 10.27, Subdivsiion 4 (A). In addition to all accessory structure ordinances. a) Current location of barn as shown on your Clans is not final as the trolosed seltic sites will be located in that same location. The barn must be E laced on the 1 rot erty to meet the following setbacks: 100' from front street yard 26' from wetlands 935' elevation 75' from all other troterty lines h) eased on the 6.5 acres of area, a total number of 4 horses may be maintained on the site. 4. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C) - Allowed area for accessory structure = 3,000 s.f. Protused - 2,280 s.f. (57'x40') Zoning File i1569 July 13, 1990 Page 2 of 4 5. Septic code requirement. As of this writing, the City is not in receipt of the final perc and boring tests Performed on July 12, 1990. We are assured by the on -site septic evaluator that he will have the information into staff by late Friday or early Monday so that staff can confirm suitable area for on -site sewage/disposal systems for the proposed 10 bedroom home. The evaluator has found suitable area based on slope conditions and 75' set back from the wetlands (review Exhibit E). 6. Section 10.03, Subdivision 21 - Exception. A determination as to whether the proposed land alterations fall under this section or require selarate conditional use permit review. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B1-2 - Applicant's Addendum Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Plat Mal Exhibit E - Conceltual Septic Malping Exhibit F1- Tolographic Survey 1=100' allroximation Fxhibit G - Site Plan Exhibit H - First Floor Plan Fxhibit I - Lower Floor Plan Review of Application - !'he ap p 1 i cant l rol oses the resident is A deve lopmant of the 20+ acre site to the immediate east of the Parten lroperty. If members remember, this is the trolerty that is served by the 60' wide easement through the Parten prolerty. Staff has never received a copy of the easement documt nt. Technically the property aplears landlocked. Prior to scheduling the application before the Counci 1; the City must be in receilt of a copy of the easement document. Applicant will be reslonsible for extending the existing lrivate drive to the west boundaries of the property. Based on all l revious reports, the current easement will allow a driveway within the 60' right-of-way as shown. Review Exhibit E, the site Ilan that locates septic systems to serve the lrulused residence, the lrulosed barn at 57'x40' must be relocated on the site tc meet the setbacks defined above. The lrojerty with total acreage at 20+ acres would permit a 3,000 s.f. oversized accessory structure. The lroEcsed structure is 2,280 s.f. Zoning File #1569 July 13, 1990 Page 3 of 4 It is not customary for the City to ask for septic testing when dealing with a 6h acre dry contiguous site. Many portions of this site are restricted for septic use with severe slcpea and by the required setback of 75' from the wetland. in addition, I lease review the floor flans of the proposed structure. There Is a total of 10 bedrooms proposed for this residence. Two of those bedrooms are proposed for guest or domestic staff use. The two sleeping rooms are located on the first floor. Note that there are no kitchen areas proposed. Applicant is advised that if kitchen areas are ever installed to serve this section, a reparate conditional use permit will be required for a guest house/non-rental apartment. The crucial issue for this review will be if aptlicant's consultant can provide test results that confirm the site can maintain a 10 bedroom home. Once again, staff will confirm the capabilities of the site at your meeting. In reviewing the site plan (Exhibit F), note the grading proposed as a result of the major cutting and filling to be done on the site. The at t licant will be •�xt.ected to file detailed grading and drainage plans with the building permit application, p-rcviding detail on all retaining walls on the site. Note the retaining walls proposed are located well within the required setback for accessory structure. Aptlicant's representative should provide information as to the maximum height of the walls proposed. It is difficult for staff to determine whether a separate conditional use permit review would be required lacking detailed plans. As one may argue that because of the totography the necessary land alterations and retaining walls are required to protect the foundation of this oversized principal structure. The building and zoning code would allow such land alterations under a building termit. Planning Commission may wish to ask further questions of the apt licant and to provide direction to the staff. Please review Exhibit B1-2, Mr. Webber has provided a listing of the hardships and unique findings for this property in seeking a front/street setback at 68' where the 100' setback is required. They are reviewed as follows: 1. The majority of the home meets the 100' setback. The setback variance is sought for only a garage and entry addition to the residence. 2. The house has been t laced at the edge of the ridge in order to minimize erosion and the major cutting into the more steeper elevations. Zoning File 11569 July 13, 1990 Page 4 of 4 3. The severe slopes to the east and north required placement at the top of the ridge in order to minimize impact on extreme dense vegetation. This will minimize the removal of trees in the steeper elevations decreasing potential for erosion problems. The total finished area of the house is approximately 11,594 s.f. (7,402 1st floor, 4,192 s.f. finished area lower level). Applicant should be advised that any future development of the lower level involving higher water usage may be very difficult based on the limited area of dry lands at 6% or less. Options of Action - Denial. 7f denied, p lease refer to the necessa.y findings in Section 10.08; or Alproval pending confirmation that there is adequate area for on -site sewage treatment facilities to serve a 10 bedroom home approving a front street setback variance of 32' or 32% for Sam McCYoud for the proterty located at 4280 Bayside Road, based on the findings set forth by att licant's architect noted above, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant to provide detailed grading/drainage plans with detail c;n retaining wall jE on application for a building permit. 2. Applicant/owner is placed on notice that additional improvements to this structure involving increase in water usage may be p rohihi ted based on 1 imitat is ns of available dry lands at less than 68 slope. Pending final determinatic;n f.ur need for separate conditional use Eermit review, app licant may be al lowed to proceed with setback variance application and file a separate conditional use permit for August meeting if grading is found to exc•ed the allowed amount associated with a building permit; car Table subject tc, ap p l i cant filing a conditional use l ermit attlicatiun. Zoning File #1569 August 7, 1990 Page 5 Additional. Cons ents and Planning Co ission Recoss endation - Additional Exhibits - Exhibit J - Webber Letter dtd 7/27/90 Exhibit K - Planning Commission Action Notice Exhibit I. - Elevations The Planning Commission granted unanimous approval of the front street setback variance, approving a 68' setback instead of the required 100' for the principal structure. In addition, the Planning Commission found the extent of the proposed grading and installation of retaining walls did not require separate conditional use permit review, noting the c;iading and drainage review can be done under the authority of a building permit review. The severe sloping topography %vi'_ 1 require major cuts into the bank. The proposed retaining walls will provide stability to the foundation and allow the preservation of adjacent mature trees. Such alterations are customary wren dealing cinstructior, at such several slopes. The Planning Commission accepted the applicant's findings of hardship listed on Page 3 of the staff memo. They conditioned approval on applicant's submitting additional septic testing prior to the Council meeting to assure that there is adequate area to support a 10 bedroom home. Applicant's original submittals provided septic testing that would satisfy the needs of an 8 bedroom residence. Staff is in receipt of a letter (Exhibit J) from applicant's architect, Mr. Webber, stating that the building plans have been revised reducing the number of bedrooms to B. Please review Exhibits H and I, the original septic test information submitted for the Planning Commission review will satisfy the septic needs for the proposed house. The enclosed approving resolution is presented for Council's review and action. RUN DATE 06/20/90 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT NO. P1435401 • OWNERS PROPERTY OERS LIST PAGE 18 • BATCH 007 38 06-117-23 11 0005 38 Oa-117-23 11 9004 38 06-117-23 11 0006 • PROP ADDR 04746 BAYSIDE RD 04050 BAYSIDE RD C4O:J BAYSIDE RD • OWNER NAME VC: CAPITAL INC G A M MRIFLL CURTIS A ELIZABETH LEVANG TAXPAYER VZI CAPITAL INC GARY U LONIJELL CURTIS A ELIZABETH LEVANG NAME/ADDR PO BOX 375 401,0 BAYSIDE RD 4010 BAYSIDE RD • LOW LAKE MN 557,56 MAPLE PLAIN rN 55359 MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 • • 38 06-117-23 12 ODDS 38 31-118-23 41 0002 38 31-118-23 41 0003 • PROP ADDR 0435S BAYSIDE RD 04025 NATERTOWN RD 04045 I.ATERTOWN RD OWNER NAME VCI CAPITAL IN(. J S A P 0 RICE EARL N DORN ETAL TAXPAYER VCI CAPITAL !NC JERO'tE STANLEv RICE EARL N DORN • NAME/ADDR PO BOX 375 4025 `IATERTON RD 4045 WATERTOWN RD LONG LAKE MN SS3S6 MAPLE PLAIN MI 55359 MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 • 5b 31-118-23 41 0004 PROP ALDR 04105 NATERTONN RD OWNER NAME D GIGUERE A A GIGUERE • TA'f--YER JOE A PAM SAHCHU( (SAME/ADDR 4105 WATERTONN RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55S59 • 38 31-118-23 43 0008 " TOP ADD' 04300 BAYSTOE RD • MIER NAME SCHUTZ-014111 CORPORATION TAXPAYER SCHUTZ-O'NEItL CORPORATION NAME/ADDR 101S TONKANA RD LONG :AKE MN 553S,, • 38 31-IIS-ZI 44 0005 • PROP ADDR OW: ADDRESS UNAS:IGRNED 06R4fR NAME J 'S RICE A P DRAKE RICE TAXPAYER JEROttE S RICE NAME/ADDR 4025 WATERTOWN RD • MAPLE PLAIN WN S5359 • • • 0 3E 31-1)8-23 4. 0011 0411S HATFRTCFN RD MICHAEL R A MARY E PLANK MICHAEL R A MARY E PtAtK 4145 HATERTOIN kO MAPLE PLAIT MN 55359 38 31-118-23 44 0003 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STA'I t1N DEPT STATE •tlD DEPT FUR SALt O ADJACENT PROPSRT JWNEr ONLY 38 31-118-''3 43 0003 00038 Afhr:iSS UNASSIGNED DANIEL C PARTEN DANIEL C PARTEN 1015 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 31-118-23 44 0004 000" ADDRESS LNASSIGNEO THOMAS E REIERSGORD ETAL THOMAS E RFIERSGORD 4500 H 44TH ST MPLS MN 55424 TOTAL BATCH 00/ 00013 ft —. (3 RUN DATE 04/20/90 • BATCH 007 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY ONNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI43S401 PAGE 19 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE RFPRESENTAIION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT Of PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST Of MY KNONLEOGE AND BELIEF. DATE � �- 1c, BY ool I • 'ol AV LA • P �Q l c--�3 OC) 117 -. AIA* , `t i p 1�, O - - -ff 1sl.�a N 0 47- 14O _ �✓ //�S- Sf r ss 1 — ,visi �� i � _--, _ _ _ - - 1. _ _ _ __ .1'' �I �~ J� ! �. �' + � �� - � �/ �� f � / / / � � / � � � � i / � / � �� / - — -- � / / / _ _ i � _ __ _ � 4 / J �/ _ • -O _ � W `\�/Lr� � �, �, �a � ''e'" � (,, / � r _ � � . ,tip _ �� .� i I: / � � �. ,M �• � _ � S C H WAR Z / 145' 1 ()l I" \ \ \ \\ I %1 f July 27, 1990 Jeanne Mabusth City of Orono Crystal Bay, MN 55323 W E B E R A R C H I T E C T S I vtI f APOI I', %IINN ISO TA • 55426 (6121 926-1156 ( ^wm RE: Sam McCloud Residence - Set Back Variance Dear Jeanne: Enclosed you will find revised floor plans which show a reduction of the number of bedrooms from 10 to 8. This revision does not effect the set back variance since there was no problem with the set back at the bedrooms previously and therefore there is no problem now. We now have 8 bedrooms which means that th,: septic system information previously submitted should be adequate for the 1200 gallon system required. If you see any problem at all regarding the septic system, please let me know and we will get you additional information. Thank you. Sincerely, SCIIW R7./Wl•:Fl1-:R ARCHITECTS, INC. r-- &- at—� Neil Weber, A.I.A. N W/sk Enclosure CITY OF ORONO ZONING FILE #1569 P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 473-7357 Date of Notice: 07/24/90 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Sam McCloud COPIES TO: Neil Webber 5101 Highway 55, Suite 1000 Schwarz/Weber Architects, Inc. Minneapolis, MN 55422 3952 Louisiana Ave. South Minneapolis, MN 55426 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF MPpTING: July 16, 1990 VOTE: 6 For 0 Against Planning-c...sission recos ends the following: Approval subject to conditions noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: The Planning Commission recommended approval of the front/street setback variance as proposed. Approval was subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to scheduling the variance application before the Council for final action, staff must be in receipt of additional septic testing confirming that there is additional area on the site to satisfy a 10 bedroom home. Septic testing must be received by August 2, 1990 if the application is to be scheduled for Council action at the August 13, 1990 meeting. The deadline for the August 27, 1990 meeting of the Council would be August 16, 1990. The Planning Commission also found that the proposed grading and installation of retaining walls did not require separate conditional use permit review and noted that the grading and drainage review can be done under the authority of the building permit review. The Planning Commission adopted the staff's approval recommendation as set forth in the staff memo dated July 13, 1990 sent to you prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Please contact Jeanne Mabusth (47'-7357) if you have any questions concerning the directives noted above. lsv aw I I I i I, - Do= I PATIO - - - - EATNo DEM rAM UVW Foot REOEATM04 a y VIA LJr 8 rnm PAT10 v I I I I GMAT ! Aw— - - t. s X e tl I II ,I it ;i I 1 7 'AM —Lr4m no= IMCMATM I KAYrAM AM" a... ow sm POOL LdVUER ' • • " Ocala, Oct roe SAM i KEL.LY 1 ORONO, MINNESOTA � r I m ZA O~ N i I li �' A i 1 / t I SifETOTALLV COVEFM .._ .._ i SITE AREA ABOVE WETLAND (935) ELEVATION 6.5 ACRE e �o►s r• !ram � o tw =*men" •M •AN (CELL ao ORONO. to that Main CONTRACT KM DBBO dated Vey to , loll by and bo-iwon TNONAS S. MIBRSM sad CAMILLA MICASOOSD, Vendors sad iAwSJUK= B. SOSCON Dad SNSWI ►. Soscos, Vendome Vendors hereby reserve as sesement foS soadway purposes and utility Purpose* In and over the following drleoKbod pretaloos located in Nannopin County, to wwoots, to-vlt' The South 00 foot of the Southeast quarter of the South- west quarter of the Southeast qus:tdc of Section 310 Township Ill. Range 23, and The Southeasterly 0o foot of a 2.39 acro parcel measurod along and parallel with the Southeast boundarY thereof of the following described tract, That pert of the North- wost 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Sectlos 6. Township 117, North Sanga 27, heat of the Sth Principal Meridian, deocrlbod as follower M1�lnniag train the North- me corner of the Northeast 1/4 of Mctloe S, in-- -hip 117, Range 23, therco Bast along the Northerly it" of said Section S14 toot to actual polar of beginning, thence deflecting right 117 degrees A minutes a distance of So$ toot to the conterlin• of County NOW No. Sdr thenco deflect left along sale. cantor - line 160 toot; theoco deflect loft II degrees 19 minutes 662.11 foot to a point as the North line of *aid section Gr located 216.SS toot Scat of the point of beginning; then wrest along said North Ilene 216.35 toot to poist of beginning. The above described oasemant 10 an appurtenant easement for the bmweflt ems uee of the following described property; The most 23 acres of that part of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast guartar of Section 31, Ttwsship III Sangs 2). lying South of the Blectric Shoreline Ssil,wy Cop;amy right-of-way, acoording to the United States Gsrrerwment Survey thereof sad situated in Mennepin Count?7 Maneeeeta, ear the two percels previously deocribed herein wfttch are subject to the eseemisat. wnd000 agree to ocostruct a driveway at their eapeoa+ on said eansMSst to the Seat line of said Southeast quarter of the Southwest see of "a ft-"thma.t quarter of Mow Section )1, Tnship lli. "a �7. 0M It to agreed that the driveway to be co-%st"ucted on Said easesnt shall ooagly with the re�tImeante. it any, for Srlveway construction welch era Laposed by, mend le otfoct on the date of this contract for do" u the City of Orono, and th&t said driveway shall be of sufficient width to pernit your -Around ingress and egress by a normal stem passenger wtamobile, ear shall be gravel surfaced. Io the ovont that remdoos dMire to have the dcivwft orve more then erne S4}Lo-femlly Bossing emit as the property, * agree that they Will 11aJt tho mrwor of horsing units which "y be se. a "wit property ee that Is amy ovaat the driv~y will be pomitted, by govermtr•tal ordiawn.L..s and regulations In effect on the date c • LAI* somtreot tar do". to *or" at least one f l l aingle-family bousinr wait as the boM fitod 23 sore parcel described Berets. ORONO REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 13, 1990 ZONING FILE #1568-PIERPONT CONTINUED Mrs. hierl,ont stated that Mr. Tim Adams is the fee owner of the property. She said, "Mr. Adams has been very supportive of this project and wants to see it proceed." It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2854, granting a conditional use permit and separation setback, side yard setback, and street setback variances, subject to a satisfactory resolve of the lot combination issue between all parties involved. If the parties are unable to reach a mutual agreement, the application must come back to the August 27th Council Meeting. "otion, Ayes-4, Nays-0. Motior passed. Councilmember-omtten ?d that staff inform Council of any decision that is made. #1565 SAM MCCLOUD 4280 BAYSIDE ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2855 Mr. McCloud was not present. undorstanding that Neal Weber, intended to be present, but had not Mabusth stated that it was her the applicant's Architect. yet arrived. Pernhardson summarized the information contained in Jeanne Mabusth's memo dated July 13, 1990. He noted that the applicant's have revised their plan from a ten bedroom house to an eight jedroom house in order to address the septic concerns. He said, "An eight bedroom structure will only require one principal and one alternate septic mite." ,aliahan asked how access to this property is achieved. Mabusth replied, "There is a 60' easement for access to this parcel from the adjacent parcel." It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Mayor Grabek, to -idopt Resolution N2P5:, approving the front street setback variance to construct a residence at 4280 Bayside Road. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0. Motion passed. PUBLIC FACILITIES - DIRECTIONS FOR ZONING Bernhardson said. "This i3 a follow up to our earlier discussions regarding public facilities and the zoning of such facilities. My memo outlines various issues that may stem from locating other governmental units within the community. I have tentatively scheduled a meeting for August 22, 1990 at 4:00 p.m. Once I have confirmed that date and time with the City of Wayzata, I will provide written notice to you." Councilmember Callahan suggested tabling this matter. It was moved by Ma --,or Grabek, seconded by Councilmember - 14 - APPLICATION NO. 1569 C [ F ORONO 1' )x 66 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION 1 Bay, MN 55323 57 Date of Notice: 8/23/90 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 9'�� am McCloud COPIES: Neil Weber 101 Highway 55, Suite 1000 Schwarz/Weber Architects inneapolis, MN 55422 3952 Louisiana Ave. S. Minneapolis, MN 55426 --------------------------------------------------------------------- IF APPLICATION: Variance --------------------------------------------------------------------- t F MEETING: August 13, 1990 VOTE: 4 For 0 Against --------------------------------------------------------------------- (L ACTION - NOTION: i adopt the approval resolution based on the findings and conditions resolution previously mailed to you. Approval of your proposed ace has been based on an 8 bedroom residence. Septic testing :ted with application satisfies the proposed level of use. Please a septic design must be submitted with the building permit •ation. 'lease arrange to sign the 3 original resolution copies at the City es (Monday through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30). All persons with an !st in the property must sign the resolutions. ariance approval is limited to the extent shown on approve' elan and ted in the approval resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject rther review by the City. Variance approval expires one year after :)f approval. A Building Permit application must be submitted no later August 13, 199). S C H W A 1 0( 11%l V`. June 22, 1990 R Z / W E B E R A R C H I T E C T S Itil I ,01 111 • %11NNIAP011ti `011,OI • 55426 ,6121 926-1156 Jeanne Mabusth City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Ms. Mabusth: i4to (0�p-b tw.�' 0 t9 Enclosed you will find an application for a front yard set back variance from 100' to 63'. We have worked very hard to complete a design that would reduce the amount of variance requested. At this time we are submitting: 1. A competed application form with check for fee 2. Certified property owners list within 150' 3. flat map 4. Topographic survey Due to the death of my father-in-law 1 will submit site plans, grading plans and other site data the first part of next week. We are requesting that the front yard set back which you indicated is 100' be reduced to 68. Most of the home would be set back at a distance greater than the 68' point. We have worked hard on the design of the home to hold it as far from the property line as possible. As you can seep from the topography, the site falls off quickly to the east and north. The slopes required that the home be placed at the top of the ridge. This means, in turn, that the home impose on the 100' set back line. We require no other variances on the sits. The site topography and extremely dense vegetation cause Mr. McCloud hardship in siting his. home. The home is large (approximately 11,000 S.F.) and has been designed to take advantage of the site conditions and vegetation. It is important to us to maintain as much of the vegetation as possible. 6-21- Jeanne Mabusth# 69 � Page 2 �++�► June 22, 1990 It should be noted that although the westerly edge of the property is designated as the front yard, it really does not function as a front yard. Since there is no public right of way. In reality, the site has two side yards. The site is unique in that way. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, SCHWAR?/WEE3ER ARCHITECTS, INC. J � i Neil Weber, A.I.A. NW/sk Enclosure