HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketMINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, February 28 , 2005
7:00 o'clock p .m.
(9 . #05-3081 ZB CONSTRUCTION, INC., 26xx KELLEY PARKWAY (OUTLOT E,
STONEBA}J, Continued)
adoption at the March 14th City Council meeting reflecting one elevator, 83% indoor parking,
and additional landscaping around the parking area for the Stonebay lofts, 2670 Kelley
Parkway. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
*10. #05-3083 CITY OF ORONO -CMP AMENDMENT -PRELIMINARY APPROVAL
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to conditionally approve 2000-2020 Comprehensive
Plan Amendment #3 adding certain properties along Myrtlewood Road and 25 South Brown
Road to the defined Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) subject to review and
comment by the Metropolitan Council, and direct staff to submit the amendment to the
Metropolitan Council. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
11. #05-3084 JAMES AND PATRICIA OLSON, 4360 BAYSIDE ROAD-VARIANCE-
RESOLUTION NO. 5288
Gundlach stated that the applicants were requesting a front yard setback variance to permit a front
yard setback of 72' when 77' cmTently exists and 100' is normally required in order to construct an
attached 2-stall garage adjacent to the existing single stall garage. She indicated that staff would
recommend denial of the request as submitted; however, staff would recommend approval of a
front yard setback variance of 77' which would not increase the existing non-confonning front yard
setback.
James Olson read from his prepared statement that it was their intent to increase the curb appeal of
their home, maximize space, and minimize impacts on views with their design. He urged the
Council to support their request, since they own a 3.5 acre property in the 5 acre zone . Olson
pointed out that the 72' setback would not impact any views for him or his neighbors and that they
had provided written acknowledgement of their support and indicated their surprise that he needed
variance approval at all.
Sansevere asked what staffs objection to the 72' was.
Gaffron stated that the applicant would be increasing a non-conformancy.
Mayor Peterson noted that the current layout of the home would be dramatically impacted if the
applicant were forced to satisfy code.
Olson stated that, due to the angle of the home on the site, it is not easy to reposition the addition
without further encroaching on setbacks, the septic site, or adversely impacting existing trees . In
a ddition , repositioning the garage addition would impact views from the back of the house and
deck.
White stated that the planning commission had a difficult time coming up with a hardship after a
great deal of discussion.
PAGE 7 of 10
',
:1
:1
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, February 28, 2005
7:00 o'clock p.m.
(11. #05-3084 JAMES AND PATRICIA OLSON, 4360 BAYSIDE ROAD, Continued)
Gaffron noted that staff found enough hardship to allow them to remain at 77', as opposed to the
increased 72'.
Olson reiterated that, due to the placement of the septic, drainage, slope of the land, and trees, they
could not come up with a better solution or design.
Mrs. Olson interjected that they had hoped to add some architectural interest to a 60's rambler.
W11ile he wished Council could give the applicant exactly what he wanted, Sansevere was hesitant
to set new precedent without hardship and not being consistent.
Attorney Barrett stated that he had not heard formal hardship which would warrant an additional
5'.
Since building a detached garage elsewhere on the site would cost them valuable pasture land for
their horses, Olson asked whether the Council would consider allowing them to continue across the
front line of their foundation rather than setting it back from the current straight line.
White stated that he was willing to extend the footprint of the foundation in keeping the look of the
house. He felt this would be consistent with the design of the home to allow the applicant an
additional 2'.
White moved, McMillan seconded, to deny the original variance request, but to adopt
RESOLUTION NO. 5288 with revisions that would permit a variance for the continuation of
the current front foundation line for construction of the proposed garage addition for 4360
Bayside Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
*12. #05-3087 ANDREW AND MARCIA FREESE, 2914 CASCO POINT ROAD -
VARIAN CE -RESOLUTION NO. 5289
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, adopting RESOLUTION NO. 5289, a Resolution
granting a hardcover variance for the 75'-250' zone and an average lakesbore setback
variance for 2914 Casco Point Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
*13. #05-3088 MICHAEL KURUVILLA, 850 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST-
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -RESOLUTION NO. 5290
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5290, a Resolution
granting the conditional use permit and sign variances for Orono Montessori School located
at 850 Wayzata Boulevard West. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0
MAYOR/CITY COUNCIL REPORT
Murphy introduced Gabriel Jabbour who had just returned from a meeting with the Veterans Board
regarding the Big Island Vet Camp property and wished to make some comments.
PAGE 8 of 10
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, February 22, 2005
6:00 o'clock p.m.
(#05-3083 City of Orono, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Continued)
to the Wayzata sewer and water extensions to provide capacity and service connections for fut11re
service of the Myrtlewood neighborhood.
Gaffron indicated another area proposed to be included in MUSA is 25 South Brown Road, which is an
existing developed property located just south of Watertown Road with a failing septic system. The
house was originally constructed in 1940 and consists of 3.0 acres with 1.5 acres of filled or disturbed
soils unsuitable for septic with the remainder wooded.
Gaffron noted the proposed amendment would need to be submitted to the Meirnpolitan Council for
their approval. Gaffron stated preliminary discussions with Met Council indicate that because the area
of the amendment is less than 40 acres and would have no impact to metro systems, the amendment will
likely be considered as minor and approval is expected in the near future.
There were no public conm1ents relating to this application.
Leslie noted lack of sewer expansion has been an effort to contain density in certain areas and inquired
what impact this would have on the densicy in those areas.
Gaffron stated this expansion would not provide for any subdivisions and would not impact the density .
Rahn moved, Fritzler seconded, to reconunend approval of Application #05-3083, City of Orono,
South Brown Road, Comprehensive Plan Amendment -MUSA Boundary.
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
5. #05-3084 JAMES AND PATRICIA OLSON, 4360 BAYSIDE ROAD, VARIANCES,
7:00 P.M. -7:12 P.M.
James and Patricia Olson, Applicants, were present.
Gundlach indicated the applicants are requesting a front yard setback variance to permit a front yard
setback of 72 feet when 77 feet currently exists and 100 feet is nonnally required . The applicant is
proposing to construct an attached 24' by 30' two-stall garage adjacent to the existing single stall
garage. The property is located in the RR-lA, One Family Rural Residential DistTict, which has a five
acre minimum, and consists of 3 .51 acres.
Staff finds that there is a hardship that supports some degree of front yard setback variance. The
existing house was constructed prior to adoption of the current zoning regulations, including the
100-foot setback.
St aff r ecommends denial of the request as submitted since the request for a variance at 72 feet is not
consis tent with previous approvals and denials as it would increase the nonconformity. Staff would,
PAGE9
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, February 22, 2005
6:00 o'clock p.m.
(#05-3084 James and Patricia Olson, Continued)
however, reconm1end approval of a front yard setback variance of 77 feet, which would not increase the
existing non-conforming front yard setback. Gundlach noted the applicant would have to redesign the
garage to achieve a 77 feet setback.
Mr. Olson indicated in discussions with his builder and other contractors that the reconm1ended option
was to constrnct the garage in this manner and that there are potential water damage issues if the design
is changed.
Kempf inquired whether it was reconm1ended to relocate the windows.
Olson indicated that was the recommendation.
Ralm inquired whether the garage is 30 feet front to back.
Olson stated it is.
Ralm questioned whether the length of the garage could be shortened. Rahn stated he is unsure where
the peak lines up with the windows but that in his opinion there are a number of options that the
applicant has. Rahn noted the Plaiming Commission has consistently not allowed further
encroaclm1ents. Ralm reiterated in his view it could be redesigned.
Leslie conunented the garage could be angled.
Olson stated the rationale for going the direction they are proposing is to avoid the need to remove tlu·ee
large pine trees.
Rahn asked for public comment on this application.
There were no public conunents.
Kempf stated it is unlikely that the Planning Commission would allow continued encroachment and that
there are a number of options that the applicant could consider for this project. Kempf stated in his view
it does not appear likely that the Planning Conm1ission would allow the garage to be constrncted toward
the stTeet any further than the existing setback.
Olson inquired whether a 24 by 24' garage would be an option.
Leslie stated in his opinion there are a number of options the applicant could employ without further
encroaching into the setback.
Olson indicated the house met the setbacks at the time it was constructed and questioned whether there
is any grandfathering allowed.
PAGE 10
MINUTES OF TIIE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, February 22, 2005
6:00 o'clock p.m.
(#05-3084 James and Patricia Olson, Continued)
Leslie stated the Plmming Commission is taking into consideration the fact that this house was
constructed prior to the current codes and that the City has allowed the 77 feet front yard setback.
Ralm stated he is in agreement with Staffs reconm1endation. Ralm suggested the applicant consider
revising his plans.
Mrs. Olson stated the existing tuck-under garage is recessed and that they are frying to improve the
appearance of the strncture by changing the roofline.
Rahn noted that side of the house is located 77 feet to the stTeet and that in all likelihood there is a
design element that could be utilized to achieve the 77-foot setback.
Leslie moved, Kempf seconded, to recommend approval of Application #05-3084, 4360 Bayside
Road, with the condition the proposed garage be located no closer to the road than the current
77 feet front yard setback. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Bremer indicated she would have allowed the strncture to be constructed at 7 5 feet.
Olson inquired whether the setback goes from the corner of the foundation or the overhang.
Rahn indicated it is typically the foundation and not the overhang.
Gundlach noted the overhang in that situation should not exceed one and a half feet.
6. #05-3085 J1JL ANN, INC., 3455 SHORELINE DRIVE, COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN
REVIEW, 7:13 P.M. -7:40 P.M.
Harry and Julie Kreslins, Applicants, Paul Overson, son of the property owner, were present.
Gundlach stated the applicant has requested a conm1ercial site plan review in order to relocate her
existing business across the stTeet to 3455 Shoreline Drive and to obtain an occupancy and/or building
permit for property located at 3455 Shoreline Drive. The applicants are proposing to convert an existing
lmver level vacant space into a beauty shop/salon, which is a permitted use under the B-1 zoning
district.
Gundlach noted typically permitted uses do not require Planning Commission or City Council approval
but it was discovered by Staff that this space never received any legal occupancy permits, which is the
reason for the commercial site plan review. The purpose of the conu11ercial site plan review is to verify
adequate parking, safe and legal access, signage in accordance with the sign regulations as well as a
;C'leral review of the site. Gundlach stated currently there are two accesses to this site, one at Shoreline
u1, i~ C.x the :olreet level businesses and one through the Keaveny site to the direct east off of Kelly
PAGE 11
J<m,%V ()fEDWTION r E){l4t f?T'
fO I.A.~D vv I N 6 CAT'{ CO v N Ll ~ Af P fU>V .N-,
Of 2,j-ii\o~
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES
TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 78-395 (B)
FILE NO. 05-3084
WHEREAS, James A. Olson and Patricia E. Olson, husband and wife
(hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 4360 Bayside
Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows :
That part of the West ½ of the Northwest ¼ of the Northeast ·¼ of Section 6,
Township 117, North, Range 23 West of the 5th P.M. described as follows:
Beginning at the Northwest comer of the Northeast ¼ of said Section 6; thence
East along the North line of said Northeast ¼, 514 feet; thence South 27 degrees
and 30 minutes West 589 feet to the center line of the County Road which extends
across said Northeast ¼; thence Northwesterly along the centerline of said County
Road to the West line of said Northeast ¼ and thence North along said West line
to the point of beginning, according to the United States Government Survey
thereof, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota
(hereinafter the "property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicants have made application to the City of Orono
for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-395 (B) to allow construction
of an attached garage 72' from the front lot line when 100' is normally required and
where a front yard setback of 74' was recommended to allow for extension of the front
foundation line of the existing home and attached garage.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
Orono, Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 05-3084.
2. The property is located in the RR -lA, Zoning District which requires a
minimum lot area of 5.0 acres and a minimum lot width of 300 feet. The
applicant's property is 3.51 acres in area with 426 feet of width.
Page 1 of 5
3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing
held on February 22, 2005. The City Council reviewed this application at
the regularly scheduled meeting held on February 28, 2005 and
recommended approval of a front yard setback variance to allow a setback
of 74 feet based on the following findings:
a. The existing house, which has a setback of 77', was constructed prior
to adoption of the current setback requirement of 100'.
b. Approval of the front yard setback request of 72' would not be
consistent with past approvals on lots with similar conditions.
c. Approval of a front yard setback variance of 7 4' by allowing the
garage no further forward than the extended front foundation line of
the house will result only in a slight increase in the non-conformity.
d. The request to increase the number of attached garage stalls from the
existing single stall is a reasonable request based on the current
construction trends.
4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings
and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff,
comments by the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed
variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community.
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are
peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning
district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic
conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring
property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is
necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to
preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in
keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive
Plan of the City.
Page 2 of 5
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-395 (B) to allow
construction of an attached garage 74' from the front lot line when 100' is normally
required so that the front foundation line of the existing home and garage can be
extended, subject to the following conditions:
1. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicant and
annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. Any
amendments to the site plan which are not in conformity with City codes will
require further Planning Commission and City Council review.
2. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant,
but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for
the new construction within one year of the date of Council approval, or the
variance will expire on that date (February 28, 2006).
3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
4. The undersigned applicants have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms
of this resolution and on behalf of the applicants and the applicants' heirs,
successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the
chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 28 th day of February, 2005.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor
Property Owner( s)
Page 3 of 5
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ day of
, 2005 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota ----
municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
Notary Public
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ day of
____ , 2005 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota
municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
Notary Public
Page 4 of 5
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
This instrument was acknowledged before me this_ day of _____ , 2005
by James A. Olson, husband ofPatriciaE. Olson, husband and wife.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
Notary Public
This instrument was acknowledged before me this_ day of _____ , 2005
by Patricia E. Olson, wife of James A. Olson, husband and wife.
Notary Public
Page 5 of 5
'
I • uJ
I" f\ ,,....,
"" u:::
....
'
"a ~ \
\
\
\
\
(J) ....) wO
f-0:.:
0 Cl -s::t z w-s::t WI C"")
0 f-~
0
(J) . wO (J) .
f-w w!
o_] f-'
zw o;
w c:a Z·
o:S W' o:
• @
ZONING FILE: 05-3084 CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway
P.O. Box66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
(952) 249-4600
NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: March 1, 2005
TO: James & Patricia Olson
4360 Bayside Road
Orono, MN 55359-9438
TYPE OF APPLICATION:
COPIES:
Front Yard Setback Variance
DATE OF MEETING: February 28, 2005 VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST
Motion: To approve per the :findings and conditions of the resolution previously mailed
to you with the following revision:
• The front yard setback approved would be that of extending the current front
foundation line of the home, not the 77' recommended and approved by staff and the
Planning Commission.
Please arrange to sign the 3 original resolution copies at the City Offices (Monday
through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30). All persons with interest in the property must sign
the resolutions.
Variance approval is limited to the extent shown on approved plan and as noted in the
approval resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to further review by the City.
Variance approval expires one year after date of approval. A building permit must be
obtained no later than February 28, 2006.
If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the
City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council.
I ,
I
I
t -.
I ~ I
Date Application Received: 1-18-05
Date Application Considered as Complete: 1-18-05
60-Day Review Period Expires: 3-18-05
Department Approval:
Name: Janice Gundlachj'.:)
Title: City Planner
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Administrator Approval:
Date: February 24, 2005
Item No.:
Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: #05-3084, James & Patricia Olson, 4360 Bayside Road-Variance -Resolution
Zoning District:
Lot Area:
Lot Width:
List of Exhibits
RR-lA, One Family Rural Residential District (5 acre minimum)
3.51 acres (153,157 s.f.)
426 feet
A Resolution per Planning Commission Recommendation
B -PC Action Notice 2-23-05
C -PC Memo and Exhibits of 2-17-05
Application Summary: Applicant requests a front yard setback variance to permit a front yard
setback of 72' when 77' currently exists and 100' is normally required. The applicant is
proposing to construct an attached 2-stall garage adjacent to the existing single stall garage.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to approve a front yard setback request in accordance with the
staff recommendation noted below.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends denial of the request as submitted. Staff would however recommend approval of
a front yard setback variance of 77' which would not increase the existing non-conforming front
yard setback. The applicant will have to redesign the garage to achieve a 77' setback.
A resolution consistent with this recommendation is attached for your consideration.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Adopt the attached Resolution granting a front yard setback variance of 77' when 100' is normally
required to allow construction of an attached garage for 4360 Bayside Road.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES
TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 78-395 (B)
FILE NO. 05-3084
WHEREAS, James A. Olson and Patricia E. Olson, husband and wife
(hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 4360 Bayside
Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows:
That part of the West ½ of the Northwest ¼ of the Northeast ¼ of Section 6,
Township 117, North, Range 23 West of the 5th P.M. described as follows:
Beginning at the Northwest comer of the Northeast ¼ of said Section 6; thence
East along the North line of said Northeast¼, 514 feet; thence South 27 degrees
and 30 minutes West 589 feet to the center line of the County Road which extends
across said Northeast ¼; thence Northwesterly along the centerline of said County
Road to the West line of said Northeast¼ and thence North along said West line
to the point of beginning, according to the United States Government Survey
thereof, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota
(hereinafter the "property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicants have made application to the City of Orono
for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-395 (B) to allow construction
of an attached garage 72' from the front lot line when 100' is normally required and
where a front yard setback of 77' was recommended for approval so that the existing
non-conforming front yard setback is not increased.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
Orono, Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 05-3084.
2. The property is located in the RR -lA, Zoning District which requires a
minimum lot area of 5.0 acres and a minimum lot width of 300 feet. The
applicant's property is 3.51 acres in area with 426 feet of width.
Page 1 of 5
3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing
held on February 22, 2005 and recommended approval of a front yard
setback variance to allow a setback of 77 feet based on the following
findings:
a. The existing house, which has a setback of 77', was constructed prior
to adoption of the current setback requirement of 100'.
b. Approval of the front yard setback request of 72' would not be
consistent with past approvals on lots with similar conditions.
c. Approval of a front yard setback variance of 77' will not increase the
current non-conforming setback of 77'.
d. The request to increase the number of attached garage stalls from the
existing single stall is a reasonable request based on the current
construction trends.
4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings
and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff,
comments by the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed
variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community.
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are
peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning
district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic
conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring
property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is
necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to
preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in
keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive
Plan of the City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-395 (B) to allow
Page 2 of 5
construction of an attached garage 77' from the front lot line when 100' is normally
required so that the existing non-conforming front yard setback does not become more
non-conforming, subject to the following conditions:
1. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicant and
annotated by City. staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. Any
amendments to the site plan which are not in conformity with City codes will
require further Planning Commission and City Council review.
2. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant,
but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for
the new construction within one year of the date of Council approval, or the
variance will expire on that date (February 28, 2006).
3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
4. The undersigned applicants have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms
of this resolution and on behalf of the applicants and the applicants' heirs,
successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the
chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 28 th day of February, 2005.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor
Property Owner( s)
Page 3 of 5
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ day of
---~ 2005 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota
municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
Notary Public
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ day of
2005 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota
municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
Notary Public
Page 4 of 5
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
This instrument was acknowledged before me this_ day of ____ ~ 2005
by James A. Olson, husband of Patricia E. Olson, husband and wife.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
Notary Public
This instrument was acknowledged before me this_ day of _____ , 2005
by Patricia E. Olson, wife of James A. Olson, husband and wife.
Notary Public
Page 5 of 5
)
ll,
~
~
~
g
;;
~
)
ll,
~
~ s
~
" ,,
§
ll,
" §
' ,,
~
0
~
g
;;
~
)
~
§
' ~
~
g
n
~
~
§
~ g
<
g
,i
~
)
f
' ~
(_,,,,
(.J,
"' ,,)~ .,-1
~-;1 \ '-._1 , n10.110t1 "'~-• .-· ~·
(_ I 1/2 CAl'l'£D _..-~ , ., ,, ~,, ,,
\
--~"
..... "' r;
~
HW CORHER ~ 1lff f,1£1/4
t'r:F SEC.&, TWP.117, Rot.U
I ma HEHHEPIN COONTY MOfl.
,.... CAST IFtOf IIQNUU[Ht ... I
(.
I
I
I
E><J-\\'t>\T A.
569°57~00"£ (EAST) 514.00
'-NORTH iJHE ~ lHt: tnn/4 Df" lHE HC1/1' PF sec. e,
--M:ST UH( Of" lHE Nl\1/4 Of" !HE HEI/• !Of" SEC. I I
8 g
1 1
I I
I I
"' I /e; -,!,:• I
nm inOt-1 u!Y-f.
1/2~ CPEN lfl0'-1
I ~0 I
J_ ,1-.· ... ✓-L ~--· ·-11~~-t.f!'---·-·-·-·-·-·-·-· -~
;~/-.. /~"J \ .
J-JI~
C'"J
C.)
01
,, ,.. ,,
.,
\ .,-1;•-•• ,,,.. '" I ..,_ '1./{ff./ -t!Ult.0:1-IG stiDACf. \.Ui!;S: ... --.. ,._. ,,, .
.... ✓ .... \ ,"' ,.,~"I
.• ✓ I VC\, ✓ .. .,,,.v--\ / .. t-
\ ~
r'\ ,-v ,-sc:c.s.
\ 'qJQ
~-
\ "\.
\\UL
@
• C.
\ 'I!',
I
\/
~SHED
,-,i,r) -s .., ... , , rr, • , , / ,
------
L>l"\r-') ~
l\\;,L:."-'-)
I
I
1----¾.. . ... .......... I
C) o-,
I
I
,-¼"'
.&,f .. ½;,.¼ I~ Q 6
:l ~.8 ~--
"'~ l...1-~ CS ~ I ,_,
/~/ !--.;
., --
'e>~
"'" _,,__
G,AA~E W
(l.E:.V, ~ E.P 11)
ME-ET 11
~~
f ,-~··;--~ -
0 DENOTES 1n INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE SET IN
THE GROUND AND MARKED BY llCENSE NO.
40344
o DENOTES A FOUND IRON MONUMENT AS
lABElED.
@ DENOTES HENNEPIN COUNTY CAST IRON
MONUMENT
Thal pod of lhn Wr.sl 1/2 ,
t \ 7, Nnrlh, ffo119e 2J Wr.:it (
corner of lhe Nodhno.!i\ 1/4
Nor\heo,t \/'-, 514 fttl: \hi
cttn\or !inti nf {he Counlt Re
Northwou\arly olonr toni
and lh~c.~ t~o£ lh ~tdd
Slolc3 Cov,ernmeril --/'CY 11
1:J.Qlli
1.) lhb !IIJr .. -cy doc:, no\ pur
determine the e:i:oct loc1Jtior
Yrork. The conlroctor :iholl
out of hi!I foih.irc lo exoclly
2.) Conlnr:l GOPH[R STAT(
lor.olion of utilities prior lo
.3,) A !Ille opinion wo1, not
for r;,r\s\ence or non-nb\er
conduclod by lh1:1 surV1:1yor f
~-) Area "" Cross: 166,621
Righi of Way: lJ,,rn)
He!: 1SJ,1:
Area ... Ovllol A, JOHHSON
(re
5.) ZCJnin9 nnd 3c\bnr.\1 ir,lo
Zoning: RR-1A -Ono fornl
Sntbac~n: front -100 lc,c
lfo<>' 100
~ ~(
Slrccl Sit.le O I~
6.) Survey c:oordinole ond b
7.) Minne:Joto Stole Statute
Mop!I or plol:, mod lo< rcco
or tronsfef \ilia to lho pror
pvrpo!l(J!l,
B.) Any rnodific:olion 1 □ lhi!l
Urn :,urvcyor !ligning lhb c:e
nullify tho validity or \hi:l :11
9hofl conntllula valid certilir
9.) lnfufn1olion !).hoi:,rfl hr.rr:c
informotlonol purpo:u: only,
10.) Eeorlng ,hoftn In porof
I horahy corUI\• lh:il thir. pb11 nr r.po
11ru)<?1 my dirncl :;upnl'lir.1011 ;uul 111;
U!ltltU tho ll\WS nl lht:i S/;tlO ur Mirmr
ZONING FILE: 05-3084 CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway
P.O. Box66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
(952) 249-4600
NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: February 23, 2005
TO: James & Patricia Olson
4360 Bayside Road
Orono, MN 55359-9438
TYPE OF APPLICATION:
COPIES:
Front Yard Setback Variance
DATE OF MEETING: February 22, 2005
Planning Commission recommended as follows:
Approval consistent with the staff recommendation, which permits maintaining the
existing 77' non-conforming front yard setback, not the 72' setback originally requested
by the applicant.
VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as:
City Council-Monday, February 28, 2005; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m.
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission or Council minutes,
they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning
Commission or Council. If you have questions, please call City Planner Janice Gundlach
at 952-249-4623.
e This Side Ink Jet -Image Other Side All others -Image This Side Ink Jet -Image Other Side All others -Image This Side Ink Jet -Image Other Side All others -Image Thi,
fi:<Df'l .; .,U 'l<ee f e e s 19n Assoc1a ·Leo
I
I
/,
I
I
i
I
I
i
.,... .,.J,-,,,.,, ••'• ,,, ..
l -·r
'r-2> ,~
! ,-
KP I =
}
' I
I
Jfr.,,,,._
,,/li'
rs;;"·~·\:\,~
\\::,,,..,:;_:_;:,)'
7
i ~ ~11----11
=I
JTHTTUV'i'.J'
.,.
:S?:fJ~l.::'; ~~;;, . ·
>r.:-:·1 ~?9
I
i
i
Ink Jet-~ lm~ge Other Side All others -image This Side
~'.-l8, '= t-Jf::l .
1 --1
~J-
µJ
I
I
' I
Ink Jet -Image Other Side All others -Image Thi s Sid e Ink Jet -Image Other Side Al
• 0 ~ §C'1-~t42r-
"I . 71.-. .• ---•---=---,,-----.. --,.,-,,
-~ ~ _::c. p ~ U' :C) 0 J:,,... ;j -'----+
? e.----
" 1-=·
~
/I -tS
Is
.:::i
' ~ :s
<
" "O en
J
0
~
"' .§
~ ..,
:s
" -0 en
~
~ .§
~
i
~
" -0 en
§
g,
"' .§
.!! :s
~ en
"' i§
~
.§
~
-5
0
<
~ en
J
0
j
jj
r .,. ~,
(_.,. .,.... .>~ .,..,
J,.,.
1...\1 FllD lflOH WOii~.--·· (_;'/2' CM>PED_..-
.,,. -1 ;Ir
J,.,.
'r (0
~
NW C!: Of' 'l'HE ,-.(1/4 /.,.r:F SE 6, Tf<P,117, RC£.2l
I rnD H(H ~N COUNTY LION .
CAST ~ u~uup~T
I
I
I
I
S89°!ii7'0O"!; .(~SJ 514.00
'-HC)f(TH Ulf[ ~ l1HE HW1/4 OF'" lHE" H£.l/4 OF S(C. &
"40 IJlOt-1 UON,
~2•CP£N net,,
--'M':S
I
LIN( OF n,r 11111;, OF 11-IE HEI/A~OF stc. B i
7 1
:'.!
~
I I
I I
I P0-I
I ~ I ,---~--k~,.?~-~·=·-·-·-·-·~---L.-tJ.. ✓;,"?· ·--\ ~~-' I ·t~:~( -t!Ult.U!!IG S~iOACi~ ll!i!;°5 h.....,, ·~ ~-\
✓•
C..-_;
Cj
0
(y
,. \
I\ 1 1:1'." -1 I A •~C\ / .,.
\ ~
r'\ r.: v,-s;;.-c.sJ
• t;,
\ '\,
% \ 'q.
.\ \
l
~SHED
MU. \/
@
T~~'r). ~ ; ;· ,~[;[.:i'-3
I
I
I
---
I
I
I
I
.~"' .&'.f
~/:-;*
tl§l ~---,,., ,✓-
~ c/ -t} I
1...1
/-.S
!--/ ., ' I,-
' "'"" -....
··, ()
O 0ENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE SET IN
THE GRGUND At,/0 MARKED BY LICENSE~NO.
40344
• DENOTES A FOUl•JO IRO!. M13NUMENT AS
LABEl,EO.
@ DENOTES HENN~PJN COUNTY CAST IRON
MONUMENT
Tho\ por\ ol lhc Wes\ l/2 c
117, Nodh, Range 2J w~:sl c
corner of Iha Norlheosl I /4
Norlhco:!t\ 1/lo, 514 lctl~ lht
CMlhr line of the County Re
NorthwGB\erly along the cont
ond lhcnce Noclh along :sold
Stoles Covcrnmenl ·Sur111:y II
!!lQill
1.) Thi, ,urvey doc, not pur
determine \he c~ocl locotior
work. The conlroclor shell
out of hi!J failure to cxoclty
2.) Ce><>\or.l GOPH[R STATE
locolion of utilities prior lo
3.) A !Ille opinion was not
for eJ1\!l\r:ncc or non-e1:l:1\er
conduclad by lha surveyor 1
-t.) Area "' Cross: 166,621
Righi cf Woy. 1.l,◄6)
Nel: 15),1!
Area "" Ovllol A, JOHNSON
(Fe
-5.) Zc.ini-ng ond :,c\boc.lc !nfo
Zoning: RR-1A -Ono Foml
Satboclu; Fronl -100 le-a
Rear -100
Side -5{
Slrccl Side -100 le
6.) Survey coordinate and b
7.) Mlnne,oto Stole Stotute
Mop, or plot., lllod for rcco
or tron,fe-< lil1o to tho pro~
pvrpoSIJ5.
6.) Any modificolion lo lhis
the :surveyor :signing thi, ce
nullify lha validity of lhi, Sl
9holl conalllulu valid cerlific
9 .) lnformolion shown her ec
informotl011ol purpo:ic only.
10.) Bearing Dhown In parer
I horolly cnr1,ly lh:ll thi!. pl:1n or !:f!O
11ndc1 my dirocl ::a1i,nrvir.l o11 ;;md th :
Ut\dOf Iha 11,ws ol l111J St;,io nf Mfnui
ie A,11 othet -Image This_ Side Ink Jet -~er Side All others -Image This Side
I
....
I
I
I
.t_;. G • -:_, C\ \ f
. -..J \,./ c,
' -'/ I I
1._ f:;., ,..._ • -JAit· /
C...J IV l-4_
Ink Jet -Image Other Side All others -Image This Side Ink Jet -Image Other Side
·--~.-.J,.·, ... ~
-I /""\
/
/
Date Application Received: 1-18-05
Date Application Considered as Complete: 1-18-05
60-Day Review Period Expires: 3-18-05
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Chair Rahn and Planning Commission Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
Janice Gundlach, City Planner~
February 17, 2005
05-3084, James & Patricia Olson, 4360 Bayside Road
Front Yard Setback Variance, Public Hearing
#05-3084
February 22, 2005
Page 1 of3
Zoning District:
Lot Area:
RR-lA, One Family Rural Residential District (5 acre minimum)
3.51 acres (153,157 s.f.)
Lot Width: 426 feet
Application Summary: Applicant requests a front yard setback variance to permit a front
yard setback of 72' when 77' currently exists and 100' is normally required. The
applicant is proposing to construct an attached 2-stall garage adjacent to the existing
single stall garage.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends denial of the request as submitted. Staff
would however recommend approval of a front yard setback variance of 77' which would
not increase the existing non-conforming front yard setback. The applicant will have to
redesign the garage to achieve a 77' setback.
Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Sections
Sec. 78-395. Area, height, lot width and yard requirements.
(b) Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be observed:
Lot Area (acres) Lot Width (feet) Front Yard (feet) Side Yard (feet) Side Yard Adjacent to Rear Yard (feet)
5 300 100
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A -Applications
Exhibit B-Hardship Documentation Form
Exhibit C -Existing and Proposed Survey
Exhibit D -Survey dated 4/27173
Exhibit E -Proposed Elevations
Exhibit F -Proposed Floor Plan
Exhibit G -Photographs
Street (feet)
50 100
Exhibit H-Illustration of 24' x 24' Garage at Existing 77' Setback
Exhibit I-Adjacent Property Owner's Acknowledgement Forms
Exhibit J -Property Owners List
Exhibit K -Plat Map
100
Background
#05-3084
February 22, 2005
Page 2 of3
The applicant originally applied for a building permit in December of 2004. At that time
the Building Official required that the applicant obtain a survey. Upon submittal of the
survey it was discovered that the proposed garage would not meet the required 100'
setback from Bayside Road. Upon examination of a survey dated April 27, 1973 it was
determined that the house was probably constructed with the intent of meeting a 100'
setback from the centerline of the roadway, not the edge of the right-of-way. The
applicant then met with City staff and completed all the necessary submittals in order to
apply for a variance.
LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET
Lot Area/Width
RR-lB Lot Area Lot Width
Required 217,800 s.f. (5.0 acres) 300'
Actual 153,157 s.f. (3.51 acres) 426'
Setbacks
LR Required Existing Proposed
Front 100' 77' 72'
Rear ( north) 100' 240+' 240+'
Left Side NIA NIA NIA
Right Side ( east) 50' 145' 124'
Structural Coverage
This property exceeds 1.99 acres and is not subject to structural coverage requirements as
outlined in Section 78-1403.
Hardcover Calculations
This property is not located within the Shoreland Overlay District and is not subject to
the hardcover restrictions outlined in Section 78-1288.
Front Yard Setback Variance
The applicant has requested a front yard setback variance in order to construct an
additional 2 attached garage stalls. The existing setback of the house is 77' where the
garage will be setback 72'. The applicant has proposed a 30' deep and 24' wide 2 car
garage. Because a 100' front yard setback is required and only 72' is proposed, a
variance is necessary.
Hardship Statement
#05-3084
February 22, 2005
Page 3 of3
Applicant has provided a brief hardship statement in Exhibit B, and should be asked for
additional testimony regarding the application.
Hardship Analysis
In considering applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the
proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated
traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of
property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval
for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict
enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual
property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such
actions will be in keep inf( with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoninf( Code.
Staff finds that there is a hardship that supports some degree of variance. The existing
house was constructed prior to adoption of the current zoning regulations. Also, past
setbacks were apparently measured from the centerline of the roadway because the
property is legally described to the centerline of the roadway. The northwest comer of
the house meets a 100' setback from the centerline of the road, but because the lot line
curves with the roadway the southwest comer is shown at a 95' setback. The existing
Zoning Ordinance which was adopted in 1975 established the front lot line as the edge of
the right-of-way, which occurred much later than construction of the house.
Now that a hardship has been established, it should be determined to what degree a front
yard setback variance should be granted. It is clear that an attached garage cannot meet
the 100' setback because in moving that far off the front lot line it would no longer be
attached. In the past the Planning Commission has granted variances for situations such
as this, however no increase in the non-conformity is usually granted. Therefore, staff
finds that the applicant could revise the depth of the garage to 24' so as not to become
closer than 77' to the front lot line while still providing egress from the two windows off
the 2nd story of the existing home by creating a notch in the roof which would not be
visible from the road or end view.
Issues for Consideration
1. What degree of a front yard setback variance should be granted?
2. Should an increase in the existing non-conforming setback of 77' be permitted?
3. Is it reasonable to grant a variance for an attached garage when a detached garage
could be constructed on the site within all setbacks? How about a 3-car total attached
garage?
4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application?
Staff Recommendation
To deny the 72' front yard setback variance request. Staff would recommend approval of
a front yard setback variance of 77' which wouldn't increase the existing non-conforming
setback. The Planning Commission should advise the applicant to redesign the garage in
order to achieve a 77' setback.
/,
EXHIBIT A
City of Oron o
Variance Application
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
Main : 952-249-.4600
fax : 952-249-4616
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 5532:3-'.}066
Application # ~e:; -J_;{j 3 '-/
Date Received : ljJg7~15
Amount Paid : _ b7iii. "lio
Staff : JIWJlE
Fee : $600 ---'--:::-:-::-::--------Renew a I: $300 ---'---::---------A ft er -the -fact: $1,200 Double Fee
This application form must be completed in full. Ap~ :cant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the
application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas.
PROPERTY INFORMATIO ~ . n. fl . \
Site Address: 40UJ(J) <J:5~-S ,cR_su K,00.Q {J--v-cM-O , WJ J\J
Property Identification Number (Fliilj): {Z)Lo -JJ,7-d-3-L& -CD(p0..1_
(Attach legal description to application if not inc lu ded on the survey.)
Date Property Acquired (m _onth/year): ~ □ Yes, I own the adjacent parcels .
Present use of property: ~ Residential □ Other
Zoning District: RR-JA ----------------
rital status required for each interested party)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
.-·17
I; '/ '.·:
·.,
1._·1
I.• , f · .... .: .. ._ :..:,..;,,
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS:
All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your
application to be processed.
Pre-Application Meeting Form, completed by a City Planner.
Completed Application Form
Completed Hardship Documentation Form
Certified Property Owners List -owners within 150' of the subject property, labels and plat map.
List, labels and map may be obtained from Hennepin County Department of Finance,
Government Center, A-603 300 South 6th Street, Minneapolis, telephone 612-348-5910
Original Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor), meeting all the requirements
listed within this packet, including hardcover calculations. Also provide one copy 8.5" x 11" or
11" x 17" for reproduction.
Completed hardcover calculation worksheets (as provided within the variance packet).
Topographic survey -including existing and proposed elevations. Provide one copy 8.5'' x 11"
or 11" x 17" for reproduction.
Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views (provide one copy 8.5" x 11" or 11" x 17").
Additional items may be requested by City Staff depending on the scope of the project. *
APPLICANT'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Planning
Department, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or
consultant expenses incurred in review of this application and certifies that the information supplied is
true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that he/she is solely
responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the
staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for
denial of the request regardless of its potential merit.
Applicant's Signature:
Applicant's Signature:
Date ~?i fJfJlY5
Date: 7
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable
entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission & Council Members for
purposes of investigation and verification of this request.
Owner's Signature: ~
Owner's Signature:
Date ~7~
Date:
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission
Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are normally held on the third Monday of each month.
Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and
Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to
have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant and advise the City Planner
assigned to your project.
City of Orono
Pre-Application Meeting Form
(This form is to be completed by a City Planner during your pre-application meeting .*)
Street Address: Mailing Address: For Office Use Only:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
P.O . Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
City Planner: _._~ ,__/4N-"---'-Jt£'--=;c-~~~~-~---
Meeting Date/Time: fi/Zf/Dlf JOA-M
Main : 952-249-4600
Fax: 952-249-4616
PC Date: fg;. z:zµj.,'
What is the purpose of a pre-application meeting?
Pre-application meetings aid the applicant in preparing a complete proposal, inform them of the
procedures and requirements of the city code , and identify policies or regulations that create
opportunities or problems for the proposal.
PROPERTY INFORMATION: h'\
1
Site Address: 4 3lOO r~~~ J;::()'x~
Property ldentificatio9i Number {PW):
Zoning District: RK-JA Size o_f _P_ro_p_e-rty_:_3 -:&-~~-~~~--J---------
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
□ Average Setback □ Side Yard Setback □ Rear Yard Setback
□ Hardcover □ Lot Coverage □ Lot Area □ Other: @&t:ft_ bl (l/llrn Aj£ Sr~Ptrt-.
~Front Yard Setback , □ Lot Width
fz,;/l-
Applicant's
Initials:~
HARDSHIP: Applicant has received the Hardship Documentation Form,
understands it as it has been explained to them, and is aware that it must
be completed and submitted in conjunction with their formal variance
application.
OTHER INFORMATION:
*Please note: Your variance application will NOT be accepted without a pre-application
meeting during which this form will be completed by City staff.
Applicant Signature ~-~-· --'-'--------=---""-"""'-"-n_---------Date: ~~; ~ 7
Q)
As of January 1, 2004 the
Building & Zoning
Department has implemented
a new process for applying
for variances.
PLEASE READ THE
ENTIRE PACKET TO
A VOID UNINTENDED
DELAYS IN
PROCESSING YOUR
REQUEST
EXHIBIT B
Page 1 of 3
HARDSHIP DOCUMENTATION FORM
This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application
will not be considered complete or placed on any meet ing agendas until this form is
complete and submitted to the City.
Minnesota State Statue Section 394.27 , Subdivision 7 requires that a hardship be
demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The hardship must be unique to the
property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic
situations are not considered valid hardships. In order for an application to be heard by
the Planning Commission and City Council a hardship having merit must be
demonstrated .
HOW DO I PROVE A HARDSHIP?
This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if a hardship
exists and how the variance will affect the surrounding community . To prove a hardship,
address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible .
Since you are requesting the code exception , you have the burden of proving that the
variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a
den ial or approval recommendation . If you leave something out it will not be considered .
Please address each of these hardship criteria as they relate to the request (some may
not apply):
1. "The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under
conditions allowed by the official c
' ' !Q._,.,
2 .
3 .
4. "Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if
reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter."
5 .
6 .
7 .
8 .
9.
10 .
11.
Page 2 of 3
"Undue hardsh ip also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct
sunlight for solar energy systems . Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered
construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd . 2, when in
harmo w s Chapter." /11 B !)r/-:(}.
1
c ~ ff C>a?tDux0 ./cvvfl..tr
"The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a
o[(l',-~mily di,yell·n as a two-family 9 e~:
!hJ+tl ff )r 6mvttJ (j~~
"The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health , safety,
comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning
,Wt , ·:;J~~
-~JLwf/i.,
Q,,,L1,:s:,;~ a1/t'l
12 .
Page 3 of 3
~=~~-=---:..=:::;.-=+-J---HF=~~=--==~~~=;i-+-=-~~~~ ~ ~Y5
=~..:.::;' ~~:2..LL-1=-=ur-~;~W~=!........'.....=~.::..:..::..L~Ll..lLl=~~I....L....S.,~::::..,..::.-=~fV;~. ~ ~v»Jµ~a f,orv -fo-H&_,,~~_j or!k1Nd OJ~ /}s l1i1
po'&:;/b/<(0 ~-6.., l.h¥ltt~ ~c)yd..f~.
Hards h ip Statement
Should you feel the hardship cannot fully be described in the above criteria , describe the
unique hardship , practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance
w ith Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach addit ional sheets if
necessary):
' -
---FND IRON MON.
:::::--,,_ RLSJ17025 N89°45'42"W 153.21
-q ---.::::.__---
~\'HEELER
---
NW CORNER OF THE NE.1/4
/ 'OF SEC.6, TF.117, RCE.23
I FN0 HENNEPIN COUNTY MON,
CAST 1RCW MONUMENT •
\
\
\
S89°57'00"E (EAST) 514.00
'-NORTH LINE OF 1HE NWl/4 OF THE NE1/4 OF SEC. 6
~~~'CJ 1 1 -,
t • I I /
~SHED
I
I
I
I
I
I
FNO IRON UON.
1/2" OPEN IRON
o DENOTES 112 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE SET IN
THE GROUND AND MARKED BY LICENSE NO.
40344
e DENOTES A FOUND IRON MONUMENT AS
LABELED.
@ DENOTES HENNEPIN COUNTY CAST IRON
MONUMENT
EXHIBIT C
NORTH
40 20 0 20 40 BO
SCALE IN rEET
DESCRIPTION Of SUBJECT PROPERTY
That port of the West 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 6, Township
117, North, Range 23 West of the 5th P.M. described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest
corner of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 6; thence East along the North line of said
Northeast 1/4. 514 feet: thence South 27 degrees and 30 minutes West 589 feet to the
center line of the County Rood which extends across said Northeast 1/4i thence
Northwesterly along the centerline of said County Rood to the West line of said Northeast 1/4
and thence North along soid West line to the point of beginning, according to the United
Stoles Government Survey thereof. ond situote in Hennepin County. Minnesota.
1.) This survey does not purpor\ to show ony utilities. The contractor sholl
determine the exoct location of ony ond oll existing utilities before commencing
work. The contractor sholl be fully responsible for any ond all domoges arising
out of his foijure to exactly locate ond protect oil existing utility facilities.
2.) Contact GOPHER STATE ONE CALL at 651-454-0002 for precise onsite
location of utilities prior to ony excovalion.
J.) A title opinion was not furnished to the surve)'Of' and no specific title search
for existence or non-existence of recorded or un-recorded easements hos been
conducted by the surveyor os port of the survey.
4.) Area • Gross: 166,621 Sq. Ft. -3.82 Acres
Right of Woy: 13,463 Sq. Ft. -0.31 Acres
Net: 153,157 Sq. Ft. -3.51 Acres
Area • Outlot A, JOHNSON WHEELER 1ST ADON.: 9,625 Sq. Ft. -0.22 Acres
(F'or informotionol purposes only)
5.) Zoning and setback informotion os provided by the City of Orono Web Site:
Zoning: RR-1A -One Fomny Rural Residential District (5 Acre)
Setbacks: Front -100 feet
Rear -100 feet
Side -50 feet
Street Side -100 feet
6.) Survey coordinate and bearing basis: Hennepin County
7.) Minnesota State Statute 3838.603 Subd.2 (Hennep;,, County Highways) states:
Mops or plots med for record under this section shall not operate of themselves
or transfer title to the property described but such mops shall be for descriptive
purposes.
8.) Any modification to this survey or sketch performed by any person other than
the surve)'Of" signing this cerlificolion or persons under his direct supervision shall
nullify the volidity of this survey. Only on originol survey with on original signature
shall constitute volid certification.
9.) Information shown hereon for Outlot A, JOHNSON WHEELER 1ST ADDITION, is for
informational purpose only.
10.) Bearing shown in parenthesis ore os shown on legal description.
I hereby certify that this plan or specification was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I am a duly license<!. land surveyor
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Dated this 20th day of December, 2004.
SATHRE~BERGQUIST, INC.
David 8. Pemberton, Minnesota License No. 40344
r REVISIONS " BY
ADD SEPTIC & WELL DBP
1/11/05
'-
0 () 0
0 z "?
'° .... ..,.
~
>-w 0) > LO
0::: z (")
-0 LO :::, 0 0::: LO (/) (f) Q) .£9 LI.. ....J -0 0 0 0 ·-1/) 1/) Q) w E.~ I-(f)
<C w 0~ (.) ~ <D u:: (") 0
i== <( "SI" C:
""") 0 0::: ....
w 0
(.)
'-
DRAWN
DBP
CHECKED
GRG
DATE
12/20/04
SCALE
AS SHOWN
JOB NO.
6775~001
FILE:
JIM OLSON CERT1F!CATE.DWG
SHEET
1
'-OF 1 SHEET"..,
I',;'.
EXHIBITD Sec <:, -· //7-2 ~ _________________________________________ ;;,_ _____ _
· 1?hont: 47.3-8352
ZIP. 55391 :•.·1·
.. Walter Benhardus 4360 Bayside .202.d l,laple Plain, l',.:.i:m.t1a
OF PROPERTY OF -----------------------,:,0-,,:;J 35 g -tt
I
A
described as follows: See Sheet 2
Scale: 1 inch / {) 0 iE>et.
~~--
\}.) ~ •'•-\ 0 I/'--
-• ·~ hereby certi~y that on Ae&1L 2. 7 19.2.J. I
made a survey of the ii !"l location of the building
· on the above described property and that the location
.,_ (~·b.uilding is. c~.~ectly ~rP the above plat.
i ,' -:\ ...... , n. , , . ~ .P. ,a; .✓-~*~i--
-. '-"'~ ll !I\ I ~ \,,t ..... ,_ ,.. // . . . , -f . ._, ..._.. a ; ,"J--:;. . ..(_ ,:> ~.I / , ;, .. --. r ~
/
~~lJ:;~fi i;::i::' :·.·:: · ·. ,
, ·.• iiJ iiti (i·.· /~. ~-.
~<"_{t
C C . .,.
I I
I I
I l
I /
; '. "/ • -~' ... .'!
l)i.~i~'..tt
, CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
/4reby" certify that on A/fill. 2.. -;i , 19 ? .:SI
;urveyed the property described above and that the
1
; abo~lat is a correct representation,,,c:~{ said survey.
;/ . :: i ~. n , /( iJ ~ -:~J?t. ~_,!}{ ----·---
/ ~ :....kJl...v, 0 l::'. i ~i l-<J .. ·· I .
" [!
I
I
i
I
I
I
!
I
' I ~
i ' I
I
FROn O'V.eefe Design Associates
Si ~
PHOi'lE NO. 952 447 5046
·..:::i \,-.)
_:::c
~
0
j:,...
Q
g'
:5
F
f:i --·
#.
:;:::: ,__,..
CY ,;
cS '. s
'111IHIHX3
Mar. 22 2004 12:15PM P1
... ••!••·,,·,,,_,.,,·1,t,,';._ •. ~., .. ,,...._, ... ~~-~, ... -:---, .... ______ ~-"''~----..
~I_
·-/
I
I
I
I
I
Ii I I
,s:,' I I
t-1 I --"Ot:.>(:\ rw~t-Q ;. L 'II.;; o I
+----------·--..J.
I i <t)'
~
~
~ ~.
~
L--
EXHIBITF
g-c;;'.--r .
.. I V 7fr
-
I
l
'
i
I
I
i
(
I
I
!
s ;
(Y,
-. i ~
i
I
i I
I
!
I -z;,~.:z.~L ----t~
I -Y, ~ : I I -I -
I I H:=i=·· :::!:::=.
I I ·: l
j I , I 1
I 'I' i
l ""ooe'.) r~i~ioaL~"b !1 : j L ___________ .J oO 1 \
,1-
-1 ) 11 ~-.__ 6 : :1 -1
~, I ✓ i 1 /
__a '--'( I L--j--
~I I I
j -!
...a :
-+·· :
::, \
0 _ I y 0-)
~
I
I ' --,. ,._, ___ ,,i--, -
tr_.,___..,__
__ -1J I~
1.---------~: ___ __,_,,_, --~------------{µ
cd vJdS i: : c i: 1700c cc · .. revJ 9170£ l1717 cS6 "ON 3NOHd
~~~(~Y _:>_ '.:;_
.;.•:
ii:>..:;-, Ill
t;,-,_.
:.]
? 11
\
)
"
. ' .. ~ ..
·-:::.J.
]
.,
·•'\
\C ;
_;.
~r-:L
k::,;··
1,
f}
'l ·-. -,tj~-\ •,
'•·~
, I
/
/
/
/ \ <?. ~ \\
I.fl . ~
\ ~ (.}.
. ~
\ ~
. \
WELL \J
~SHED
,-1 A I[) '1 '1 -7
I Vv,. / I /
1
I
I
I
I
.....
I
EXHIBIT I
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM
l(we) ~~/JJ--1/-lc----~ of 4:5c:p.,i~lGl~
[print name(s)] [print address]
have reviewed the ~ns for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located
at f ,8/t,O -~1,, ~ also referred to as Land Use Application No , ____ _
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to
declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council
that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or
use requires Counci l approval.
Pro~
l /(:3/o__5
Date
Property Owner Date
*************************************************************************************************************
I (we) 6 /LL -l /37/16 k/,iu lif'f
[print name(s)]
of 5i'C Ct?I SID H2'rfd Cr e D<c
[print address]
have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located
at -'-/3t'LJO 13A:'-/>t (J6:~ also referred to as Land Use Application No . ___ _
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to
declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council
that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or
use requires Council approval.
p ~ Date
I
Property Owner Date
If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use
Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days
prior to the scheduled meeting date .
/ .... _
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM
I (we) ~t\ Y\\.O'l\freatz_vO
[print name(s)]
of ff'ii/(J 841 ~t<k .r<J .
[print address]
r the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at
-"--==-.JL.l.~~=~'-"""o<:. also referred to as Land Use Application No. ___ _
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare
approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we)
am , (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires
Council approval.
Pro ~u[} Date
Property Owner Date
*************************************************************************************************************
I (we) /1 f}lL J? :IvH,Jso,J
[print name(s)]
of f/ '/ 5'5" i3A--'f 5 /IJ£ ~tJ A-/J
[print address]
have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at
tf ?bO /3#tj9 ,IJ t also referred to as Land Use Application No. ____ .
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare
approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we)
am (are) aware of provement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires
Council approva
Property Owner Date
If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use
Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days
prior to the scheduled meeting date.
ADJACENT PROPERTY ow~· ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM
-Nlo ✓ ,t; 6 tbtv1csr( of lf y & I !S+>'&·ffr tk. I (we)
[print name(s)) [print address)
have r::wed ~e pfamff or the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at "4?/ob ~c.r1~ also referred to as Land Use Application No . ____ .
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare
approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we)
am , (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires
Council approval.
Date
Date
*************************************************************************************************************
I (we)$,.,L / a/1
[print name( s)
ulfr of i[7r J7"yc,dz
[print ad ress)
lf}Ulwe~~r the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at Q~ also referred to as Land Use Application No. ____ .
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare
approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we)
am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires
Council approval.
r Cs ~/
~--;7 ,,~
Property Owner
Date
If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use
Application , please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days
prior to the scheduled meeting date.
? // .,.,.,,:-·.;, ,,
en.:,,\ .. =
/1!!'" k,
.,.....-.:::::?--~
\
·\
\ .
•:~·
l
·•\.c'' '
'.. . : :· ~--.... .:·-.. ", .{(.;:;J
"··. . / I ' ~/ er:'.,'
RUNDATE: 1/7/2005
3 8 061 I 723120001
PROP ADDR 4360 BAYSIDE RD
OWNER NAME J A OLSON & PE OLSON
TAXPAYER JAMES A OLSON
NAME/ADDR 4360 BAYSIDE RD
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
38 0611723120006
PROP ADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
OWNER NAME WILLIAM F KNAPP
TAXPAYER CITY OF ORONO
NAME/ADDR PO BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323
38 0611723210007
PROP ADDR 4461 BAYSIDE RD
OWNER NAME AARON F & GEORGETTE G J UBAN
TAXPAYER AARON F & GEORGETTE G J UBAN
NAME/ADDR 21 UNIVERSITY AVE NE
MPLS MN 55413
38 3 I I 1823430009
PROP ADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
OWNER NAME CITY OF ORONO
TAXPAYER CITY OF ORONO
NAME/ ADDR PO BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323
,/'-1!¾.;J \
<) \)
~ ... ·
(7~..-_:::;;-~t .. '..
·' ·-·
.·::)
-~
f\ ... ,
L, ~;·
/
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 0611723120004
PROP ADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
OWNER NAME ANNE T BLANCHARD TRUSTEE
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
ANNE T BLANCHARD
45 CRISTOFORI CIR
ORONO MN 55359
38 0611723120008
PROP ADDR 4375 BAYSIDE RD
OWNER NAME STEVEN C/PATRICIA L H WHlTE
TAXPAYER STEVEN &PATRICIA WHITE
NAME/ADDR 4375 BAYSIDE RD
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
38 0611723210008
PROP ADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
OWNER NAME M S JOHNSON & P P JOHNSON
TAXPAYER MARK & PA TRICIA JOHNSON
NAME/ADDR 4455 BAYSIDE RD
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
38 3111823430015
PROP ADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
OWNER NAME W F & E KNAPP
TAXPAYER WILLIAMF&EVELYNKNAPP
NAME/ADDR 85 CRISTOFORI CIR
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
38 0611723120005
PROP ADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
OWNER NAME W F & E KNAPP
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
WILLIAM F & EVELYN KNAPP
85 CRISTOFORI CIR
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
38 0611723210002
PROP ADDR 4455 BAYSIDE RD
OWNER NAME M & P JOHNSON
TAXPAYER MARKS & PATRICIA P JOHNSON
NAME/ADDR 4455 BAYSIDE RD
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
38 3111823340012
PROP ADDR 4440 BAYSIDE RD
OWNER NAME D MONTECALVO & N MONTECALVO
TAXPAYER DAVID & NICOLE MONTECALVO
NAME/ADDR 4440 BAYSIDE RD
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND
TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OFTHE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAXPAYER Sf/;V~S DEPARTMEJ:!J,-"P TIHl B
OF MY KNOWLEOOE AND BELIEF. ,. 7 7'\ <
DATE L)_) BY
r;C) ,/}!,
~:::> C"'.-e..l:::i
PAGE: 1
trj g
o; ....
~
""'
~
E--....
~
(7) ~ ~
q,<!I
"' "' <ti
00
"'
24.39
3?,0
6
(8)
453.11
~
~
7
~ (,.• ~
(9)
,,.,,.q,,.J>
145.08
LUCE LINE TRAIL (6)
5§
(1) I (2)
(11)
~ • • • • ~ ~ ~r --------------------------------T-------,-----
0
' . " 'lo " . . 0 ti >
> •
1
(14)
~
3
~
"' (6) (7) ~
290.81
140.75
330.83 /V89°46'01"W
I ,..~
OUTLOT ~ '
465.97 (15)
f" ~
6'-".".96'
131-118-~~ 31-118-23-43
~i ~
~ ~
~
"' ...: ~
rEEK~"'
9
(11)
(10)
~
<r;
f:f
9 1
317.78
10
(12) ~
(9)
~
~ !,U 1 ...
"' ,.
rl ~ ..,.
~
2
1
(13)
~ ~ ~
~ i ,,
·-------(12) "'" ~ ~
-----------,,.,___ -"'·"' • ""' ' "" • -...., ,, .. ,f! ". --"'" _,,, .. ' ,, . <, oi A o-"' ,,., • .,.,-w oun.o,c (16) •-
0
: "'' C
'"-(8) ~ ""'" A , "'-" ,., . .,,,-, • d. 593.53 V '
283.94 154.47
1
(4)
v-
~
~
206.99
N89 °37'34"W
? ~ 1 ~ I~ (6J \N ~ ~so~
JO°r-
206.98
06-117-23-21
S89°45'00"E 264.14
(2)
(8)
~
(5) -~l !..~ ~
(6)/1 .. &
~ ~ (j
~1/,~ ~ 5=> ·"' ~ "'
' :,
(7)
$.~
• ., • ., ... ., • ., i• •............ ., • ., • ., • .,. 5-..................... .,.' . ., ~~ .... ., ......................................................................... ., .... ., . ., . '
. . ... -0"IT'.1~\ 0 /f []
. ~:c .:(\ \t ,':/ Q ... ;,} ~ "-~
-~~ I/ <,,
I,\·. i)
,;.r:?:£},)
::;,, lY ~ 513.35
-~
~
,'!,r;i -·~
s: ~
!')
~
~
00
<O .-;
gi
Ii
FROM O'Keefe Design Associates PHONE ~n 952 44 7 5046 Apr. 12 2004 02:00PM P2
.......................................................................................... ~ .. ·---...... _ ·•r .. --·-.. ·-~--.......................... -
.. Q-,--v v
L--,~
4Dm:m;oa:==~~~~--L-ll----~~~~
FROM: □'Keefe Design Associates PHONE t✓O. 952 447 5046
.,
~ .. ',.
--;-, ~~---,,1,j .•
-I -I ~
' l~
' ,, ,.
I
) ,<
Apr. 12 2004 02:00PM P1
[l
I
I
L ......... -..
l I
; I
¢1 '
(j;)--
0
()
f'l .
..J
0
DAT A PRIVACY ADVISORY
In accordance with M.S . 13.04, Subd. 2, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you
that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may
require you to furnish certa in private or confidential information .
You are notified that:
1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or
license requested .
2 . You may refuse to supply data , but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or
license.
3. The information may be shared with other local , state or federal agencies to the extent
necessary to process the permit or license .
4 . If your requested perm it or license requires Council action to approve , some information
may become public.
5 . You have certa in rights under M.S . 13.04 (see following page) to review private data on
yourself.
6 . Your full name is required to process this application or permit.
✓~~ ~){~ ~~
(:)rV'AD VV] 5$3 SC/ ~
City State Zip
~·
Signature
_.,.
Sec.13.04 RIGHTS OF SUBJECTS OF DATA
Subdivision 1. Type of data. The rights of individual on whom the data is stored or to
be stored shall be as set forth in this section. ·
Subd. 2. Information required to be given individual. An individual asked to supply
private or confidential data concerning himself shall be informed of: (a) the purpose and
intended use of the requested data within the collecting state agency, political subdivision, or
statewide system; (b) whether he may refuse or is legally required to supply the requested data;
(c) any known consequence arising from his supplying or refusing to supply private or
confidential data; and (d) the identity of other persons or entities authorized by state or federal
law to receive the data. This requirement shall not apply when an individual is asked to supply
investigative data, pursuant to section 13.82, subdivision 5, to a law enforcement officer.
The commissioner of revenue may place the notice required under this subdivision in the
individual income tax or property tax refund instructions instead of on those forms.
Subd. 3. Access to data by individual. Upon request to a responsible authority, an
individual shall be informed whether he is the subject of stored data on individuals, and whether
it is classified as public, private or confidential. Upon his further request, an individual who is
the subject of stored private or public data on individuals shall be shown the data without any
charge to him and, if he desires, shall be informed of the content and meaning of that data.
After an individual has been shown the private data and informed of its meaning, the data need
not be disclosed to him for six months thereafter unless a dispute or action pursuant to this
section is pending or additional data on the individual has been collected or created. The
responsible authority shall provide copies of the private or public data upon request by the
individual subject of the data. The responsible authority may require the requesting person to
pay the actual costs of making, certifying, and compiling the copies.
The responsible authority shall comply immediately, if possible, with any request made
pursuant to this subdivision, or within five days of the date of the request, excluding Saturdays,
Sundays and legal holidays, if immediate compliance is not possible. If he cannot comply with
the request within that time, he shall so inform the individual, and may have an additional five
days within which to comply with the request, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays.
Subd. 4. Procedure when data is not accurate or complete. An individual may
contest the accuracy or completeness of public or private data concerning himself. To exercise
this right, an individual shall notify in writing the responsible authority describing the nature of
the disagreement. The responsible authority shall within 30 days either: (a) correct the data
found to be inaccurate or incomplete and attempt to notify past recipients of inaccurate or
incomplete data, including recipients named by the individual; or (b) notify the individual that he
believes the data to be correct. Data in dispute shall be disclosed only if the individual's
statement of disagreement is included with the disclosed data.
The determination of the responsible authority may be appealed pursuant to the provisions of
the administrative procedure act relating to contested cases.
453.11
(6) .................................................................... _ ·f · .... ~Y.f S ..... ~/NF .... T.@J~ .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . ..... . . ·r ..... .... ... .. .. .................. r .............. -~-55 ,J, ....... ..
5 ~
(7) !
24.38
0:i°'
EEK
-i'o,,.
'f,r
9
(11) ,;,
!!i t1
283.94
330
6
(8)
~ t\· ~
~
~
'::"c?.7,;,
31-118-23-34
(10)
317. 78
10
(12)
154.47
•--------------------------------r--'....~----
(4)
~
"' ~
206.99
N89°37'34"W
? ~ 1 ~ 13 (6) ~ ~ ~so~
~o'<'
169.63
7
(9)
145.08
206.98 sag• 45'00"E 264. 14
165
I 06-:~~:iJ
(2)
(1) I (2)
(11)
~
~ ; ' . . " 0 ~ ~ -----------------------1-------T-------~ ~ ~ .,~ 1
(14)
~
g
"'' (9)
lg
Cl);
(8)
3
re (6) (7) re
330.83 /l/89°46'01W
140.75/ ,.. .
OUTLOT ~~ l
465.97 (15) ~ ~r ,.... CW?
r" ~ ~ -
31-118-23-43 I:;
..:
g:i
~ ~1~ .,
~
5l
i
rt
~o~ 1·&
I.::. $ (j
1
(13)
2
,_li,'o
\'I;''
~ £ ~ ~ t
~
(12) ' 96.8,2 ~ /
v 183.79 g6.Z4 · •, R"'4o , i 0 <f! ~--
11
0 .. ,, a.<:i c:,
(16) ~"' . ,' ; 2 29 ,u l8
1
3!13..01 /g 43.62 -SB9~4'32"E.
OUTLOTC
593.53
ty !:> ~%~
.''5
~ "' -.5';.frs,~/
~D-----~--.
' -·-·1-·-·-._______ '
,, ,'
' ' ' "
:~ii's/Vo-.
" 84)-,-. _______ _
(7)
$, .~ ............. ,, .................................................................................... 5-............................ ~~ ............................................................................................ ,251"'
-~
~ ~~ _.>s
513.35
~ ~ ~
~
~
~
Ii
---.............._ FNO IRON MON,
-----......_ Rt.5117025 N89°45'42"w 153.21 -~~------
~·:HEELER
---
NW CORNER OF' THE NEl/4
/ 'OF SEC.6, TWP.117, RGE.23
I FNO HENNEPIN COUNTY MON.
CAST IRON UO.UUENT •
r\ r• v,-
\
sa9o57•oo·E (EAST) 514.00 F'NO IRON MON.
1/2" OP£N RON
'--NORTH UNE OF 1HE NWl/4 OF tHE NEl/4 OF SEC. I
~SHEi>
g
T
I
I
I
I
·-·-·-·--·L·~
-~-~tnw1:!~D S£ m,iCK ;,,h~$ -~,, /
I
I
I
I
/
',.
/'-, . .to.,
I ---
O DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE SET IN
THE GROUND AND MARKED BY LICENSE NO.
40344
e DENOTES A FOUND IRON MONUMENT AS
LABELED.
@ DENOTES HENNEPIN COUNTY CAST IRON
MONUMENT
NORTH
40 20 0 20 40 BO
SCALE IN FEET
DESCRIPTION Of SUBJECT PROPERTY
That part of the West 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 6, Township
117, North, Range 23 West or the 5th P.M. described os follows: Beginning at the Northwest
corner of the Northeast 1/4 of soid Section 6; thence East along the North line of said
Northeast 1/4. 514 feet: thence South 27 degrees and 30 minutes West 589 feet to the
center line of the County Rood which extends across said Northeast 1 /•: thence
Northwesterly along the centerline of said County Rood to the West line of said Northeost 1 /4
and thence North olong soid Wesl line to lhe point of beginning. according to the United
Stoles Government Survey thereof, ond situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota.
ti!21ES
1.) This survey does not purpor\ to show cny utilities. The contractor sholl
determine the exact location of any ond oil existing utilities before commencing
work. The contractor shall be fully responsible for any ond all domoges arising
out of his failure lo exactly locate and protect oll existing utility facilities.
2.) Contact GOPHER STATE ONE CALL ot 651-454-0002 for precise onsite
location of utilities prior to any excavation.
3.) A title opinion was not furnished lo the surveyor and no specific title seorch
for existence or non-existence of recorded or un-recorded easements hos been
conducted by the surveyor as port of the survey.
4.) Areo • Gross: 166,621 Sq. Ft. -3.82 Acres
Right of Way. 13,463 Sq. Ft. -0.31 Acres
Net: 153,157 Sq. Ft. -3.51 Acres
Area • Outlot A, JOHNSON WHEELER 1ST ADON.: 9,625 Sq. Ft. -0.22 Acres
(For informational purposes only)
5.) Zoning and setback information os provided by the City of Orono Web Site:
Zoning: RR-1A -One Family Rurol Residential District (S Acre)
Setbacks: Front -100 feet
Rear -100 feel
Side -50 feet
Street Side -100 feet
6.) Survey coordinate and bearing bosis: Hennepin County
7.) Minnesota State Statute 3838.603 Subd.2 (Hennepin County Highways) stoles:
Mops or plots fi1ed for record under this section shall not operate of themselves
or transfer title to the property described but such maps shall be for descriptive
purposes.
8.) Any modification to this survey or sketch performed by any person other than
the surveyor signing this certification or persons under his direct supervision sholl
nullify the validity of this survey. Only on original survey with on original signature
sholl constitu le valid certificotion.
9.) Information shown hereon for Outlot A, JOHNSON WHEELER 1ST ADOl110N, is for
informational purpose only.
10.) Bearing shown in parenthesis ore os shown on legal description.
I hereby certify that this plan or specification was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed land surveyor
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Dated this 20th day of December, 2004.
SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.
David B. Pemberton, Minnesota License No. 40344
,
REVISIONS BY
ADD SEPTIC & WELL DBP
1/11/05
\.. .
0 (.) 0
0 z "i'
"' r-.
st
,
>-UJ 0) > LO
0::: z C'?
"Cl LO :::, 0 0::: LO (f) Cl) Q) 2 u. .....I "Cl 0 0 0 ·-en en a>
UJ >, C:
I-Cl) &l .!: <( w 0~ (.) ~ (0 u:: C'?o
i= <(
""" C: -, 0 0::: ....
UJ 0
(.)
.
DRAWN " DBP
CHECKED
GRG
DATE
12/20/04
SCALE
AS SHOWN
JOB NO.
6775-001
FILE:
JIM OLSON CERTIFICATE.OWG
SHEET
1
\. OF 1 SHEETS,
CITY of ORONO
February 1, 2005
James A. Olson
4360 Bayside Road
Orono, MN 55359
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
SUBJECT: Zoning Application #05-3084
Municipal Offices
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
The City of Orono is required to notify you within fifteen (15) business days as to the status of your
application for a variance for property located at 4360 Bayside Road. Our preliminary review
indicates that your application is complete.
Your application is scheduled to appear before the Planning Commission on Tuesday, February 22,
2005. The meeting begins at 6:00 p.m. Please make sure that you or your representative is available
to attend the meeting. You will be mailed a staff report regarding your application prior to the
meeting date.
Please call me at (952) 249-4623 should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
City of Orono
JatuJi t/iJJtell tU_/~
Janice Gundlach
City Planner
Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fax (952) 249-4616
www.ci.orono.mn.us
Affidavit of Puolication
State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin.
Keith P. Anderson, being duly sworn,on oath says
that he is an authorized agent and employee of the
publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER,
Mound, Minnesota, and has full knowledge of the
facts which are stated below:
A.)The newspaper has complied with all the req~i:e-
ments constituting qualifications as a qual1f1ed
newspaper, as provided by Min~esota Statute
331 A.02, 33IA.07, and other applicable laws, as
amended.
B.) The printed1___:C::..:.it:.:....Y.....::o_f_ Oro_n_o_-_____ _
(9) Notice land use applications
which is attached was cut from the colu~ns of said
newspaper, and was printed and pubh_shed one~
each week for 1 _____ successive weeks.
It was first published Saturday,
12 d of February 20 05 the __ ay .
and was thereafter printed and published every
Saturday, to and including Saturday,
12 February
20
05
the __ day of --~
//~. ~ Authorized Agent
MARIETTA A. STRAUS
NOTARY PUBLIC• MINNESOTA
CARVERCOUNrt
MY C0MMISSION EXPIRES 1-31-2010
Subscribed and sworn to me on this
15 day of February 20_0_5 __ _
Rate Info rmation
(1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for com-
parable space: $15.50 per inch.
(2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter: $1_5 .50.
(3) Rate actually charged for above matter: $7.80 per inch.
Each additional successive week : $5.40.
LEGAL NOTICE ,Arm Drive, RR -1 B zoning · district,
CITY OF ORONO· requests a _conditionaruse permit in order to.
··-····~·-~·----·-··-·---
2750 Kelley P.arkway, . place approximately 6;000 cubic yards of fill
P.6. Box 66 . on site which will ultimately relocate the
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 existing 13th green to the south · approxi-
Ph<iiie (952) 249.-4600 · mately 50 feet. · · · · · . . .
Fax .(952) 219:46~;6 · 5. #05-3083 City of Orono, requests a ,
Community Managemen.t Plan amendment
NOTICE . • . . . -In . order to ei<pand the City's 2020
.The Planning Commission wil.J hold Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA)
. public hearings · in the Orono . Council . Boundary to include the property located at
Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on 25 Bro\l\ln Road South, and all properties·
Tuesday, February 22, · 2005, beginning at ·. located within • the plat of "Myrtlewood" in .
· 6:00 p.m . on the matter of reviewing the fol-Section 36 Township 118 Range 23. , This
lowiAg land use applications:.• expansion of ihe MUSA would allow tor
1. #.05-3070 Jerry Boldenow; 70 North eventual provision of municipal sewer to the
Shore Drive West , F,lR -1 B zoning district, subject properties. · .
requests a·coilditi6rial use permit to allow a 6. #05-3084 James and.Patricia Olson ,
non-rental guest apartment above the · exist-· 4360 Bayside . Road,. RR :--1 A zoning dis-
ing attached garage. · · trict, request a front yard setback variance
2. #05-3074 Sean and 'Melissa to permit a front yard setback of: 72' when .
Wamtiold, 1379·Pari< Drtve,iL/il-1B zoning 100' is normally requifed and.77';curreritly .
district, request an after-\he-fact conditional exists in order to construct 2· additional
use permit and varlance ·to permit a series stalls to the existing single stall attached
of ret.aining walls and associated _grading garage. · · · .
· within 75'·of the lake arid o\lso .a hardcover · 7. #05-3085 Julie Kreslins on behalf of ·
· variance 'within !tie 75 ' -250' icine to permit Jul Ann Hair Fashions and building owner
31 % hardcover . when ._:25%·.: is normally . Aleck G. Overson, 3455 · Shoreline Drive, B
allowed. · , · · · · ·-1 zoning district, requests a commerciai
· 3.#05:3078 · Gary · · and Lynn site plan review in order to operate a beau-
Christens.en, 3560 . Ivy Piace ;:LR -1 C zon-ty shop/hair salon out of a11 existing lower
ing distric.t, request a lake15et,q<!ck variance level vacant space located at the rec1r of the
to permit a lake setback of 40' when 75 '· is building. · · ·
normall y required and <ici" currently exists , 8. #05-3086 Philip and Cassandra
0-75 ' and 75'-250 ' hardcover veiriances and Ordway, 1145 Sixth Avenue North , LR-1A . ·
a side setback variance 19 per.mil a side set-· zoning district, request a top of bluff setback
back of 8' when 1 O' is required and 8' cur-variance in order to construct a .new resl-
rently exists in order to construct a second dence encroaching the required 30 ' •lop of
story over the existing footprint. bluff setback.
4. #05 -3082 Ameii Construction on · · 9. #05-3087 Scott Schneider on betia/f
behalf of Lakeview Golf Course , 405 North 'of Andrew and Marcia Freese, 2914 Casco
Affidavit of Publicdtion
State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin .
Keith P. Anderson, being duly sworn.on oath says
that he is an authorized agent and employee of the
publisher of the newspaper known as THE PIO-
NEER, Mound, Minnesota, and has full knowledge
of the facts which are stated below:
A.)The newspaper has complied with all the req~i:e-
ments constituting qualifications as a qualified
newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute
331A.02, 33IA.07, and other applicable laws, as
amended.
B.) The printed City of Orono --
(9) Land use applications
which is attached was cut from the columns of said
newspaper, and was printed and publi~hed once
each week for 1 successive weeks:
It was first published Saturday,
the 12 day of February 20 05
and was thereafter printed and published every
Saturday, to and including Saturday,
12 February 20 05 the __ day of __ _
l/~. /fa3t2 Authorized Agent
........ ,.,-.. :...·-.·..,..,.,_...._.,., r , :f .,,.,,.
· --: , 1:1 ARIETTA A. STRAU ~ (: ·.yn · ''1T,"';'I !'UGLIC-MINNESC
'·' ·' ' ' ·" ""t':'.-1 CO UNTY . •. "· ·, -· ··,I RES 1-3
Subscribed and sworn to me on this
15 day of February , 20-=0~5 __ _
Rate Information
(1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for com-
parable space: $15.50 per inch.
(2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter : $1_5 .50 .
(3) Rate actually charged for ab~ve matter : $7.80 per inch.
Each additional successive week: $5.40.
-------~---···-· ...... ..
LEGAL 'NOTICE
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway,
P.O. Box 66
Crystai Bay, M.N 55323
-Phone (952) 249-4600
Fax (952) 249-4616
Boundary to Include the property· located
·at 25. Brown Road South ; ai::id all proper-
·ties located within the plat of "Myrtlewood". ·
·In Section 36 Township 11 ii Range · 23. ·
This expansion of the MUSA would allow
for eventual provision. of municipal sewer .
to the subject properties .
· NOTICE . 6. #05-3084 James and Patrlc fa
The Plannfng Commission will hold .. Olson , 4360 Bayside Road , RR -1A zon-
p1,1blic . hearings . iii · the · Orono Council . Ing district, request a front yard $etback · ... ,
Chambers · at ·2780 Kelley Parkway on . .variance tci permit a front yard setback of
Tuesday, FebruarY:22, 2005, ·beginning at . . 72 ' when 100' is normally required an~ 77 '
• _6:00 . p.m . on ·the matter-of reviewing the · · currently ex.ists ih order . to construct 2
.following land use app li caiions : additional stalls to the ex isting single stall
.· . att.ached garage .' I
.1. · #05-3070 . Jerry Boldenow, . 70 <
;North Shore Drive West,-RR -rs zoning 7. #05-3085 Julie Kreslins on behalf · L
district, reques·ts a cond itional use permit' of Jul Ann Hair Fashions and building .r
to allow a non-rental guest apartment · ow·ner Aleck G . Overson, 3455 Shoreline
._above the existing _attached gara_ge . Drive, B -1 zonin•g district, requests a · . (
· commercial site plan • review in order to . c
2. #05-307 4 Sean and Melissa operate a bea·uty shop/hair salcin out of an i
Wambold, 1379 P<1 rk Drive , lR -18 zon-.. existlng ·Iower .ievel vacant space located
Ing disirict, ·request an after-the-fact con -at the rear of _ the building . · ·
dltlonal use permit and variance to · permit
a series of-retaining walls and associated
grading within 75' of . the · lake and. also· .a
· hardcover variance . within the 75' -250'
zone to permit 31 % hardcover when 25 %
Is normally allowed . ·
;3:#05-3078 Gary an'd Lynn
Christensen , 3560 .Ivy· Place, LR -1 C
zoning district, request a · lake ·setback
variance to · permit a lake setback of 40 '
when 75' is normal fy required and 40 ' cur-
. : .. rently exists·, 0-75' and 75.'-250' hardcover
variances and a side setback varianc·e to
permit a side setback of 8' · when 10' is
required and 8'. currently exists In order to ·
construct a second story over the existing
footprint , ·
4: #05-3082 Ames Construction on
. behalf of Lakev iew Gol f Course, 405
North Arm Drive, RR -i B zoning district,
requests a cond itiona l _use permit in order .
to place approximately 6,000 cubic yards
of fill on site which will ultimately relocate
the exi sting 13th green to the south
approximate ly 50 feet.
5. #05 -308 3 City of Oron o, requests a
Community Man age ment Plan amend-
ment in order to expand the City's 2020
Metropoli tan Urban Service Area '(M USA)
-8. #05-3086, Philip \Ind Cassandra
Ordway, 1145 Sixth -Avenue North, LR -
1 A zoning district, request a top of bluff
setback . variance In order to construct a
new reside.nee encroach•ing the required
30 ' top of bluff setb~pk. ·
'· • 9. ·#05-3087 .Scott· ·Schneider on
behalf of Andrew and Marcia Freese ,
· 2914.Casco Point Road, LR -1C zoning
. district, requests a hardcover. variai;ice to
permit 29% hardcover within the 75'-250'.
zone when 25% Is normally allowed ,'31%
· currently exi sts and · 27% was prev iously ·
. approved , and an average lakeshore set-
back variance· to ·permit construction of ·an
<1ddit_l onal s)ory above the ex isting fpot-
print. · · · · ·
10; #05-3088 Michael Kuruvilla, 850
West Wayzata Boulevard, RR -1 B zoning
district, requ·ests a conditional use perrnit
iri order to operate a Montessori School •
capable of serving 69 children Including
29 Infants and 40 toddiers r.anging In age
of 33 months to ·6 years old out of the
existing Cornerstone New Testament
Church building .
All persons wishing to be heard .are
enco uraged to attend this meeting. T_his is
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) ss.
)
CITY OF ORONO )
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I, Denise M. Leskinen, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify
that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #05-3084, as mailed to the attached list of
property owners.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 10th day of February, 2005.
L~ -Denise M. Leskinen
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66
. Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616
NOTICE
The Plaimi.ng Commission will hold public hearings in the Orono Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley
Parkway on Tuesday, February 22, 2005, beginning at 6:00 p.m. on the matter ofreviewingthe following
land use applications:
1. #05-3070
2. #05-3074
3. #05-3078
4 . #05-3082
5. #05-3083
6. #05 -3084
7. #05-3085
8. #05-3086
9. #05-3087
Jerry Boldei1ow, 70 North Shore Drive West, RR-lB zoning district, requests
a conditional use permit to allow a non-rental guest apartment above the existing
attached garage.
Sean and Melissa Wambold, 1379 Park Drive, LR-lB zoning district, request
an after-the-fact conditional use permit and variance to permit a series of
retaining walls and associated grading within 7 5' of the lake and also a hardcover
variance within the 75' -250' zone to permit 31 % hardcover when 25% is
normally allowed.
Gary and Lynn Christensen, 3560 Ivy Place, LR-1 C zoning district, request a
lake setback variance to permit a lake setback of 40' when 75' is normally ·
required and 40' currently exists, 0-75' and 75'-250' hardcover variances and a
side setback variance to permit a side setback of 8' when 10' is required and 8'
currently exists in order to construct a second story over the existing footprint.
Ames Construction on behalf of Lakeview Golf Course, 405 North Arm Drive,
RR -lB zoning district, requests a conditional use permit in order to place
approximately 6,000 cubic yards of fill on site which will ultimately relocate the
existing 13 th green to the south approximately 50 feet.
City of Orono, requests a Community Management Plan amendment in order to
expand the City's 2020 Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) Boundai·y to
· include the property located at 25 Brown Road South, and all properties located
within the plat of "Myrtlewood" in Section 36 Township 118 Range 23 . This ·
expansion of the MUSA would allow for eventual provision of 1:nunicipalsewer
to the subject properties.
James and Patricia Olson, 4360 Bayside Road, RR-lA zoning district, request
a frOnt yard setback variance to permit a front yard setback of72' when 100' is
normally required and 77' currently exists in order to construct 2 additional stalls
to the existing single stall attached garage.
Julie Kreslins on behalf of Jul Ann Hair Fashions and building owner Aleck G.
Overson, 3455 Shoreline Drive, B -1 zoning district, requests a commercial site
plan review in order to operate a beauty shop/hair salon out of an existing lower
level vacant space located at the rear of the building .
Philip and Cassandra Ordway, 1145 Sixth A.venue North, LR -IA zoning
district, request a top of bluff setback variance in order to construct a new
residence encroaching the required 30' top of bluff setback. .
Scott Schneider on behalf of Andrew and Marcia Freese, 2914 Casco Point
Road, LR -1 C zoning district, requests a hardcover variance to permit 29%
dcover within the 75'-250' zone whe 5% is normally allowed, 31%
currently exists and 27% was previously approved, and an average lakeshore
setback variance to permit construction of an additional story above the existing
footprint.
10. #05-3088 Michael Kuruvilla, 850 West Wayzata Boulevard, RR-IB zoning district,
requests a conditional use permit in order to operate a Montessori School capable
of serving 69 children including 29 infants and 40 toddlers ranging in age of 3 3
months to 6 years old out of the existing Cornerstone New Testament Church
building.
All persons wishing to be heard are encouraged to attend this meeting. This is not a final agenda and is
subject to change prior to the hearing. Written co1mnents are accepted and should be submitted to the
City of Orono by February 16, 2005 if possible. Plans are available for review in the City Offices and all
interested persons are encouraged to contact the City for further information. For an appointment, please
call (952) 249-4600.
City of Orono ~gC;;4-
Michael P. Gaffron, Plaiining Director
To be published in the Laker and Pioneer on February 12, 2005.,
Posted at: Orono City Offices
Crystal Bay Post Office
Long Lake Post Office
Navarre Post Office
2
RUN DATE: 1/7/2005
38 0611723120001
ROP ADDR 4360 BAYSIDE RD
,WNER NAME J A OLSON & P E OLSON
AXPAYER JAMES A OLSON
AME/ADDR 4360 BAYSIDE RD
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
38 0611723120006
ROP ADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
1WNER NAME WILLIAM F KNAPP
AXPAYER CITY OF ORONO
IAME/ADDR PO BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323
38 0611723210007
ROP ADDR 4461 BAYSIDE RD
1WNER NAME AARON F & GEORGETTE G J UBAN
'AXPAYER
IAME/ADDR
AARON F & GEORGETTE G J UBAN
21 UNIVERSITY AVEN E
MPLS MN 55413
38 3111823430009
ROP ADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
IWNER NAME CITY OF ORONO
'AXPAYER
IAME/ADDR
CITY OF ORONO
POBOX66
CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323
~·-.,.
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 0611723120004
PROP ADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
OWNER NAME ANNE T BLANCHARD TRUSTEE
TAXPAYER ANNETBLANCHARD
NAME/ADDR 45 CRISTOFORI CIR
ORONO MN 55359
38 0611723120008
PROP ADDR 4375 BAYSIDE RD
OWNER NAME STEVEN C/PATRICIA L H WHITE
TAXPAYER STEVEN & PATRICIA WHITE
NAME/ADDR 4375 BAYSIDE RD
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
3 8 0611723210008
PROP ADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
OWNER NAME M S JOHNSON & P P JOHNSON
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
MARK & PATRICIA JOHNSON
4455 BAYSIDE RD
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
38 3111823430015
PROP ADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
OWNER NAME W F & E KNAPP
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
WILLIAM F & EVELYN KNAPP
85 CRISTOFORI CIR
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
38 0611723120005
PROP ADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
OWNER NAME W F & E KNAPP
TAXPAYER W[LLIAM F & EVELYN KNAPP
NAME/ ADDR 85 CRISTOFORI CIR
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
38 0611723210002
PROP ADDR 4455 BAYSIDE RD
OWNER NAME M & P JOHNSON
TAXPAYER MARKS & PATRICIA P JOHNSON
NAME/ADDR 4455 BAYSIDE RD
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
38 3111823340012
PROP ADDR 4440 BAYSIDE RD
OWNER NAME D MONTECALVO & N MONTECALVO
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
DAVID & NICOLE MONTECALVO
4440 BAYSIDE RD
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND
TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAXPAYER SE,VIC,ES ~EPART~~~J',:P TzHB ~E~ .. )-·-··--, .. ,
OF MY KNOWLEOOE AND BELIEF. /i /,.,_\ '---.• , ?) /,;I ,,r I , ./'1 /' ,,7 A ,.
DATE j /I(_;__,, BY '. / lJ)l/(/,1./,e_..,/~//,t;/' p ✓-·1, ·.
I i ,: I . l ,.______,,
i I l ~ /
PAGE: 1
TRACKING SHEET
FILE NO. 05-3084
Staff: 1,/Aj//(£
SITE ADDRESS: 4360 Bayside Rd.
Applicant: James A Olson
Address: 4360 Bayside Rd.
Owner: James A. & Patricia E. Olson
Address: 4360 Bayside Rd.
Orono, MN 55359-9438 Maple Plain, MN 55359-9438
~ Meeting with Staff Date: l lt1\D5
□ Application Completed Date: 1\t1jo5 60 Day: ~ /~ 1 \ b:::>
□ Incomplete Notice Sent Date:
Copy of Application Sent to:
__ Engineer _ County DNR MCWD LMCD
Qi Property Owners Notified: Date: ~110\05
□ Legal Notice Published Date:
PC Meeting( s):
Vote: ---------------------
Vote: ---------------------
1;i Notice of PC Action: __ t,_,_I_Z,_'-?--l-) o_~--------------
City Council Meeting(s): _i"'---+-"'1i'-"'i-¼l-=---o~----=--------Vote: APP~ s -u
Vote: --------------------
Vote: --------------------
□ Resolution: