HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketCITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPI.ICATI 1 0—
Initial Application Fee $150.00 0.14
(
per each additiona-7variance)
Renewal Variance Fee $75.00
(no change from original application)
After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee)
PROPERTY-,OCATION
Site. Adc? `ss 3775 Bayside Road
Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 05-117-23-24oi ii
Please check one - Property X abstract or _— torrens?
Attach legal desci.iptiun to application if not included on
required survey.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT Phore (home) 475-1100
Name GErald & Candace E. Rowlette Phone (work) 475-1100 - Mr.
4 -1 14 - Mrs
Address: 3775 bayside Road City: Long Lake ' Zip: 55356
----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
OiWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)
Name
Address:
City:
Phone (work)
Zip:
Late Property Acquired _ (month/year)
I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
Present Zoning District
Present. Use of Property _ � Residentially
Other. (specify)
DBWMIPTION OF REQU8ST Estimated Construction Cost. $ 300►1 _ 00
Desc-ibe request in detail: HL;Llitiu.i of -mall :rppnhnjse
--------------------------------------------------
VhRI AW-XS RBQU I RRD
Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover
Setback Variances ( Front. Side _ Rear)
Other
HARDSHIP
Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict
enforcement of zoning regulations: Due t`n the new rnari rti rPrt 1 V ,arrrass
from our home all headlights will be shininyl dirpr-tly into the icitrhe
-------T----------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRI p+ioi r8p ni*ti§oAo oi6pk*W, totiDiS.rlbft for our, privacy.
Describe unusual property conditions preventinq compliance with Zoning
Code Requirements: We are not going any closer to the rnari than the
existing house - we are merely filling in a snare_ When the Pyictiny
---- ----------i-1 ------ -------------------------------------------------
REQOIi�eSIj4ALh it met the re,.3uirements for setback at that time.
1. Completed Application Form
2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (lou must obtain
this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center
348-3271).
3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the
names on the above lip"-. with no return address (use address labels
obtained with property owners list).
4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required.
5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes
in -existing grade are proposed.
6. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list).
7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of
any other persons you wish notified of this application.
8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please
remember that your variance application is not complete if the above
information has not been included.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete.
Zoning Official's Signature Date
APPLICAVV S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or
requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or
unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that
the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her
knowledge.
Applicant's Signature Date I`1
OWNERS SIGNATURE
The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further
authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants,
agents, Commiusion members, and Council members for purposes of investiga-
tion and verification of this request.
Owner's S i qna t u re ,___._- --- N 0 �- _� Da t e___
------------------------------- ------------------------------- --------
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the
Planning Commission Meetinq. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the
third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled
review sleetings of the Planning Ccission and Council. If an applicant is
unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make Arrangements to have an
authorised agent attend in your place and to advise the Building i zoning
Office of this change prior to the meeting.
RUN DATE 07/19/88 HE44EPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
• PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
BATCH 007
REPORT NO. PI435401
PAGE 15
38 05-117-t3 21 0005
38 05-117-23 21 0015
38 05.117 23 23 000'
S
PROP ADOR
03780 DAYSIOF. RO
03750 BAYSIDE RD
03820 BAYSIDE RD
OWNER NAME
HAZEL ANDERSON
JOHN BURGER ETAL
ANDREW E MINER ET AL
TAXPAYER
HAZEL ANDERSON
JOHN DURGER
LANDMARK. CONSTRUCTIOV INC
NAME/ADOR
3780 BAYSIDE RO
3750 BAYSIOE RD
PO BOX 246
•
LOW LAKE MN 55356
LONG LAKE MN 55t56
LOtG LAKE MN 55356
38 05-117-13 23 0030
36 05-117-23 24 0082
3,8 05-117-23 24 0083
PROP ADO:
OWNER NAME
ANDREW E MINER ET AL
DANIEL P CAHILL
JOHN BURGER ET AL
TAXPAYER
LANDMARK CONSTRUCTION INC.
MRS DANIEL CAHILL
J014N PURGER
•
NAME/ADOR
PO BOX 248
ZL4 N STH ST
37E0 6AYSTOE RD
LMG LAKE MN 55356
DELAVAN WI 53115
I0t1G LAKE MN 55356
•
38 OS-117-23 24 0084
38 05-117-23 24 01011
3.4 05-117-23 24 010;
PROP ADOR
03770 BAYSIDE PI)
OWNER NAME
JOHN BURGER ET AL
S A C GARDINER
S A C GARDINER
•
TAXPAYER
JOHN BURGER
SIEVE GARDINER
STEVE GARDINER
NAME/ADDR
3750 BAYSIDE RD
3770 BAYSIDE RD
377U BAYSIDE RD
LONG LAKE MN Si35e
LONG LAKE MN 55356
LONG LAKE MI 555 6
•
38 05 117.23 24 010:'
38 OS-117-23 24 0103
39 05 117-23 24 0105
PROP ADOR
li •
OMNtR NAME
S A C SARDINE:
S i C GARDINER
PARK METRO INV FUND INC
TAXPAYER
STEVE fiARDINER
STEVE 6ARDINEP
"JED PRICE
NAFIVAOOR
3770 BAYSIDE RD
3770 DAYSIDE RD
r L ENTERPRISES
i
LONG LAKE MH 55356
LONG LAt.E MN SS356
1611 K AVE 3
G
MPLS MN 55404
10 0!- W-t3 t♦ 0111
38 OS III-23 :. 01:2
38 05 117-21 2.4 0115
mw Ama
03775 iAYSiDt no
OWES NAM[
6 R A of ROMLETTE
STATE LAND DEPT
STATE LAND DkPT
TAXPAYER
0(RALD L ROMLETTE
STATE LAND DEPT
CITY Of ORONO
NAM/ADO:
177% BAYSIDE RI+
PARK.
.
LONG LAKt MN SS556
4,11/79 ST JtED 1567S$
3• Will t3 24 0116
ow Alm
0 SUM
STATI LAND D(PT
TAXPAIN
LITY Of ORONO
TOTkL BATCH Ni NiiR
NAiOIfMOR
cilN t to
ST 0110 161 144
r
Lo
i
HINWPIN COl►1Tr N1OPfRTr TNioomyi0N SYSTtR
PWWFNYV rAo*nS LIST
Amml MD. ►tAU401
'M! ti
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTEC 4RE AN ACCURATE AND TRUF
REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE HENNEPIN COL04TY DEP:RTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO PE BEST
OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF /1 % ,% 1 �J
DATE ' : / BrS-".
ZONING FILE #1314
Rowleltf*, 3775 Bayside Road
Revised Existing Hardcover Calculatirn, 9,6/b8.
House
2E.3' x 42.3' =
1,197
12' x 2 6 ' =
312
Garage
24' x 23' =
552
Driveway
23' x 24' =
552
Patio
19.5' x 21' =
409
Deck
10' x 3C.5' =
3c5
6' x 15.5' =
93
4' x 4' =
15
Less Area
of Deck over Patio
8. 5' x 30' _
( -E' 5 )
Front Walk
& Rock/Plastic
8' x 30' -
2,'0
Front Rock/Plastic/Overhar,y
3' x 25' =
75
Rock West
of House
10' x 30' -
300
3,966 s.f.
If Slab "C" is removed,
result is 3,966 - 146 - 3,820 s.f.
if Slab "C" 4 "B" are removed,
result is 3,966 - 146 - 1.46 - 3,674 s.f.
Hardco er allowed on 1roperty is(25N of 75-250' zone)- 4,850 s.f.
(either way, total hardcover is less than allowable,
although about half of it is in 0-75')
612-475-11
nowlette & associates, inc. po. hox 3 ong a e, n
Ay S: CA Z �
cc
s4L
0
a�
z o
C0..cvtr.0
`MZc,..,..v Go
1,.16 TLU O s— yr. A Co.-, w
knv—'
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss.
CITY OF ORONO )
I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing
concerning the matter of #1314, was mailed to the attached list
of 1 roperty owners .
In Witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal
th,s ",,d day of August, 1988.
;A
Jam a Bosma
CITY OF ORONO
NOTICE.
The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Council Chambers
at. 1275 South Brown Road on Monday, August 15, :988, on the matter of
reviewing the following land use apl-lications:
1 . 01309 Gerald Nelson, of 1 629 Bohn's Point Road, seeks a conditional
use permit to install a retention pond within his lakeshore yard.
2. #1310 Howard Eisinger, of 3245 Wayzata Boulevard, has filed for the
renewal of a conditional use hermit that would allow the filling of
100,000 cubic yard- of clean fill within his property.
3. f1311 John 6 Susan Purdy, of 1975 Fagerness Point Road, seek a rear
setback variance and a Hardcover variance within the 75-250' setback
area for a proposed addition to the existing residence.
4 #1312 William Lauer, of 3165 North Shore Drive, seeks a hardcover
variance within the 75--250' setback area for a proposed addition to
'.Y,e existing residence.
5. 41313 Richard Eller, of 2655 Shadywood Road, seeks a hardcover
variance within the 0-75' setback area for a screened porch addition
to the existing residence.
6. 41314 Gerald Roulette, of 3775 Bayside RoAd, seeks a rear/street
setback variance fcr a proposed green hoL�s,-- addition to the existing
residence.
7, #1315 Countryside Manor Homeowner's Association seeks setback and
nei.ght variances for corner monuments located within the intersection
of Willow Drive and Countryside Drive.
R. 01316 Gary Barr, of 3034 Casco Point Road seeks a separation setback
variance and a hardcover variance within the 75-250' setback area for
a proposed accessory structure.
9. 11317 Duane 6 Nancy clew, of 1135 Sough Brown Road, seek a aide an�'
street setback variance for a proposed detached garage.
10. t1318 Suad H. Azahari, of 1745 Fox Stree' , seeks a height and street
setback var�anc:e for a gate structure within the front/street yard of
the property.
11. i1319 Karen Fuller, of 4055 Elm Street:, has filed for a renewal of a
lot area variance in order to build a new residence on the propert f.
12. i1320 Dr. 6 Mrs. Robert Brandenburg, of 719 Minnetonka Highlands Lane,
seek a hardcover variance within the 75-250' setback area for a new
deck and three -season screened porch addition to t+-e existinq
residence.
k11 persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. '"he meeting
starts at 7:00 P.M. written comments aie solicited. Plans are avai 1 able
for review in the City offices, by appointment.
City of Orono
Sys Planning C:omrission
Jeang; A. Ma -3st. , Building i zoning Administrator
nistrator
To be published the wef-k of Auqust 1, 1988.
ary OF ow
raw, NQT1Qf
The rtrr+np oawrhMslen we ►told pubaa
tow1nW n rr Cmno` ChW,oq, at 1276 soutn
11111rsen ANd an Mwtdp. Aut AO 16. 19" on
the ttWAN► of rovlswatp 'he 10a0tntnp trtd use
dapaasNerw
1 1300 GOO Npaon. 0" 1 e29 80ttn $ Point
A0011 $eeto a Oarxil oriel use W" to w+Hail
• "A wadn 11i GAIN toe htttoUtore yard
2 1310 /trrwd 61.1 0 r of 3246 Wayzata
16adawd, has teed to the rMMwal of a cord,
Nertat use /snow }list would asew t►o f iviry of
100.000 otdik yards of c1esn its .r:tttlw tNe
Property
3 1 J" Jal,w tltd Susan Ptndy, of 19, 5
Pee-Oreae ►int now, soot a rear Smoot* var
to"" ow a tVirdsotNr L-A " Oe w# Nn ihs
M. 250 eetbwk ova 'Ora proposed addt!a+,
to fM on" rowdenoe
4 1312 webs l.aur of 3106 North Swde
Ow4w aaslta a hrdcovw vrtartoe within the
7s-260 oslesoh ree to a prapoied addifty,
SO Yo OR"" rsaltlsrtos
6 1313 Rlbftwd Ow, of 2eW ShedywOoj
load. on" a OL Oftwr wtrtde wittio this
0.76' swifts, am for a acrowted Paoli adds
Me:: �a.te.nw
e , ,,„ c6ar.w Rrretafl.. of 3775 same.
• rwrsrsot aeassoa wlrtae tot
0 WOPV"d Vows here odrlfbn to tits emit
Mm*dWooe
7 Isis COWWV"s, heumr ►Ipweewnsra ti-
eaidsaa at air 8816art owl he** vsplrwae f c r
alatnR atwaatrartfa lsetaed wotrn the utMreet.
ten of wfew OftV aad 0ateryelde Onus
S. 13 t e fury sw of V 6a c auoo PC" now
MMU a am on erAss , vww%m ens a hod
eattr w+rtoe Will IN the 73 W aetesea area
ee► a 1 .0aoad sccoee0ry #hucdma
s 1317 0bwta trio NNW liar, of 1136
111i 6toam Me", aaaii soft and eraal sw-
bw* vrirl0s to a Pwomed dttarahe0 @root
.10 1.P1111 S1foo M A&~. 00 174e fait
owe". eiMe a food and oil W is .1 wt.
floe for a goo struoNn wrMr1 in* irw*M ser
0&0 of " i:ncow! y
t 1 131e Kwon ltwew or oo" ehn Sl,"t
%mmr 16ad tr a nrowr of a rw roe vw rtoe v+
ralr to hu" a new raldertes an we Drewry
t y 1 i0 of and hire lleawl eywlderNtwa
r 71 • f illoni wdw ritittrnr biro. @sett a hrd
MOM .w"M 001r 11ta 76 2e0 eweeoh area,
OF 0 nry due sits 01 e►oeaasa word
}trait UdMM w ilia DO" r6salimm
As aweiwU & woe is as hard o afanar a
!tM Mao Ttio atseW wane w 1 00 0 at Wr+t
an iwtosartu we seftartad arise are "WAsma
Or +view rn sate 110V aftme " epaeerealrtt
UP of Orem*
n PWVA
fssaw A Mt wan+ wYo a Zarrte Adrnr
I�Is►
NMtod +� row lattr sae plow 046 1
r
Affidavit of Publicatirn
State of Minnesota. County of He,uiepm
Bill Holm being duly sworn, on oath sa;-s that he Is
an authorized agent and employee of the publisher
of the newspaper known as THE L AKER Mound. Min-
nesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are
stated below
A I The newspaper has ;omplled with all the require-
ments constituting qualifications as a qualified
newspaper as provided by Minnesota Statute
331 A 02. 331 A 07 and othor applicable laws as
amended
B I The printed
which is attaches .vas cut frorn the columns of said
newspaper and was printed and published once each
week for successive weeks
It w, s first published Monday,
the ' day of �V� 19 ��
and was thereafter prints and published every
Monday to and ,ncl id,ng Mondry
the day of
Auth•xt,ed Agent
Subsc►iNw ood sworn t0 in@ on t/1ts
tV
dy of
9y
�✓ A '�� Z
Rof• Infofmattoll
i. sV*mw +..wasMN'age wad by CdlwntMt.t'7 'a s tUr C(Mt1111111011M
hie ai+sr e ► ► N par• 4 n
AA.rerraw 0.0w1 by ►m t<a .rbt.v+> 'n.,w. 64 e,a rr. ♦Q.A
a Nwti . tudry cewited 40 ,luaw naAiate sit So ire on w
toi* gaeoonot su",voewe Halt 93 03 Pi, +wn
CITY C' OFOX), ML`t ILII tM
Conditional Use wvl Vari u"- A4A,1j.cati /
T,DMTICCJ OF MPOCAL (or rztwrty ) TYPE OF RLU=S
Address 3775 Bays i d e toad
Laga1 Descriptimplat 42boo Parcel 2loo Orono
APPLICANP Us t e p rope rt y ac qu i red HL21L%
Nam Jerald Leo kowletta
Andress '775 *vside ;toad
OS44ER
phOW # 475-1100
tam aaa•► � Phrrre / I
Address
PresFsit Zug in; bs a i d o n t i a i - Lk Ik Prlat Use lie e'
an
ZCrUM URdlnar> ion :Lela rlx q to rttA set � i5� - fa201- it►202
Sepcity Ord.UWWe FkquuesrYxnts 501 Front Lot Line- 751 Laaeamr
r LIWIdi:ianal Use
Vari,anoe
%+Iptlancis 'v, •-itv�oe
Fee
MR CFir CIAL USE ONLY
wwvi1 actin
Mete
Appro%-jd
Derued
•
Hardcover & Structure
EVI&Ln regUest Atl,tive to pecr'"rseants '.'us to Zoniag ohaages. since to• Does• was b-tilt.
the existing str4Ct,to no longer conforas to the ordinance . -trot closer to
the road or lat3, we •oiAld Igoe to ado our addition.��� -�
pit vt .lOri-wnrO ity Proposed new addition does not coafora to setbma.S9 froa road
and l.alt•.
mudetups to Praver'tY so own app: o:. i With the width at the lot at tde e: it s; sue__
►Nos .III wide.(iaetors aouadrf is 1061pi4s tree extotiag structure) UnfurtuaateI tree
eaistiad otv%ctur• was built Without a uarase, this ►a Nina. is a rs•i•q ftw4salt, situ
th. proyooed we "ou'l lilts to oerroct this aad other eversist.te.
t,Amt be sutaal ttar", 1 usax pr toz tD OaUrt t2 %M t M )
00VIAtAbd 4, Ahttsrctar' a Carta boats of pegasty 2. Plat M1p 'la4`
J : 'A"IVVY (Sketch in Ct.+tasa tl�tR:n Sao rt .
F�aa 4 to . +x1 n.a
CITY or ORONO
Regular fleeting or' the Orono Council, 7:35 P.A.
?-larch 22, 1976
The Orono Council met on the above date
with the following members present: Aciinq
Mayor ltassengale, Councilmembers Butler
and Welsh. Absent: Mayor Searles and
Councilmember Paurus. Also present: City
Administrator Benson, Building 6 Zoning
Administrator Auhich, and Attorney 11alkerson.
Butler moved, Hassengale seconded, that the PINUTES
Minutes of the Regular fleeting of ?larch R,
1976, be approved. Motion, Ayes (3) -
Nays (0).
fir.. Walter Lathrop, Park Commission Chairman, PARK COMMISSION
int 'oduced Mrs. Jo Ellen Harr to the Citj
Council and recommended her appointment to
the Park Con-ission to replace Fern Kubalsky
whose term expires December 3i, 1976.
Butler moved, Welsh seconded, that Mrs. Jo APPOINTUENT
Ellen Hurr be appointed to the Park Commission Park Commission
to fill the unexpired term of Fern Kuhalsky.
notion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0).
Counci Lnember Mary Butler also reported to LARSON PARK PROPERTY
the Council that the Park Commission has
recannended that the Larson Park Property
be named Dederw:.od.
Sutler moved, Welsh seconded, that the request SUBDIVISION i PRD
of Daniel T. Lindsey (Kelly Avenue Holding Co.) 2505 Kelly Avenue
for a subdivision and PRD at 2505 Kelly Avenue,
he referred to the Planning Commission. ftotion,
Ayes (3) - Nays (0).
Butler moved, Welsh seconded, that the request CONDITIONAL USE FEPI-ilT
of Kenneth W. Oien, 2980 Casco Point Road, for 2990 Casco Point Road
a conditional use perM4t for filling and gracing,
be referred to the Planning Cosenission. Motion,
Ayes (3) - May* (0) .
Butler moved, "elsh seconded, that the request VARIANCES
of RAchard Roulette, 3775 Sayside Road, for a 3775 Bayside Road
variance for lakeahore and street setback be
referred to the Planning Commissiop. Motion, �.
Ayes ( 3 ) - Nays ( 0 )
q
fie• s _ _
IsAk
I
1
Tn: M. R. Rtnson
Fii7M : It. F . Mnh ich # A.
DA7T- : March 2S, 1976
SL JFCT: Richard Rowlette 3775 Rayside Road
Variance - Lakeshore and Street Setback
Mr. Rrwlette recently ssurchmed the old Betz property at 377S Rayside
Repaid. This is the property with which vrevims problem of right -of
way encroachment was Just resolved in 197S thru a rearranxement of Lake
Street.
The location of the existing dwelling does not conforms to the street
setbacr requin anent of SO ft. and hardcover and lakeshore setback require-
ment of 7", ft. Mr. Rowlette is now requesting variances from this set-
back regairement for an addition to this existing structure. The proposed
36' x 28' addition consists of a dining room, second eating space wnd a
two car garage. The setbacks of the nroposed addition would be 66 ft.
from the lakeshore and 20 ft. from the street nroperty line.
Therefore, the variances requested would be 9 ft. franc the lakeshore set-
back requireme, t And 3n ft. from the street setback requirement and variance
fro" the 75 ft Lakeshore hardcover setback of 378 sq. ft. for the existing
construction and 00 sq. ft. for the Prpposed addition for a total of 778
sq. ft. of hardcover.
The existing structure includes a 20' x 20' concrete patio deck facing
the lakeshore. Mr. Rowlette has agreed to remove this 400 sq. ft. of hard-
cover and replace sane with a larger open redwood deck if the setback variances
are approved.
The saaxamin area of this proposed addition extending into the 75 ft. Lake-
shore setback would not exceed 200 sq. ft. This would result in a net de-
crease of hardcover of 200 sq. ft,
PtA'N1NC CrW CSinN MFFTINC - Ar►ri 1 5, 1976
The Commission recommended to the Council armroval of the lakeshore and street
ietback rrquest conditional upon removal of the 2n' x 2n' concrete deck being
replaced by a non -Pervious tvm deck hecause the Citv would rain a 2nn sq. ft.
decrease in hardcover.
(711JNC1 L !ET1IK; - April 12. 1976
The Council concurred with the Planning Comutssio+n - Approved
OttONO COU4CIL 11EETING HELD ArRIL 12, 1976 Page 4
Paurus moved, Massengale seconded, that the VARIANCE
variance reqest of Richard Rowlett", 3775 Bay- 3775 Dayside Road
aide Road, be approved as per the Planning (Continued)
Commission minutes of April 5, 1976, subject
to a correct deed being filed by Mr. Detz.
tlotion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
Paurus moved, Dotler seconded, that Resolution RESOLUTION 1672
1672, A Resolution Approving The Registered Land RLS A
Survey 11o. , be adopted, subject to the payment 3080 forth Shore nrive
of the Park-Fedication Fee in the amount of
112,000. tlotion, Ayes (E) - days (0).
Aassengale moved, Butler se-onded, that Resolution RESOLUTION 0f73
0673, A Resolution Approving The Ulmer Estates Ulmer rstates Plat
Plat, be adopted, subject to the payment of the 70 a 190 willow Drive N.
Park Dedication Fee in the amount of $800.
i Iotion, Ayes ( 4 ) - Nays (0).
Henry tluhich, Buildi,sg 6 Zoning Administrator, STRrrT VACATION
informed the City Council that itr. & Mrs. Esco 11i:1 Street
are submitting a request to vacate a portion of 300 Crestview Avenue
Hill Street as We existing well, side entry
enclosure and garage are located on the right-of-
way.
A similar proposal was den y the Planning
Comtaisrsion and Council on ruary 12, 1973.
We informed the applicant's counsel of this but
he requested we proceed with the proposal as
submitted.
The existing garage is in need of repair and
probably couli be removed or moved. The entry
enclosure could be removed and the well could
be moved.
I would recom-:wnd against this vacation as it
would result in la,tdlocking the property to the
east.
A public hearing should be scheduled.
Planninq Commission fleeting - 'larch 1, 1976
"he Planning Casrnission scheduled a public hearing
:o be held on ilonday, April 5, 1976 at 7t 30 P.11.
Planning C" Mission fleeting - April S, 1976
Jerry Snyder, atAtorney representing the applicant,
apr-cored at the public hearing and requested
Ciat the COMMisilon review the survey prepared
for the "seos. It shored the garage and s portion
of the existing house, including the wall (Continued)
OR0140 COUNCIL METING IiELD APRIL 12, 1976
Page 3
Massengale moved, Taurus seconded, to approve
the conditional use permit for Ronald Ross,
1960 Lakeview Terrace, subject to the
Planning Commission flinate3 of April 7,, 1976
and receipt of open space easement on Lot 2,
Pock 1, Long Lake Country Club Addition.
otion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
Henry 1luhich, Building i Zoning Admini3trator,
stated that Richard Rowlotte recently Purchased
the old Betz property at 3775 Bayside Road.
This is the property with which previous
problems of right-of-way encroachment was just
resolved in 1975 through a rearrangement of
Lake Street.
The location of the existing dwelling does not
.onform to the street setback requirement of
50 ft. and hardcover and lakeshore setback
requirement of 75 ft. fir. Rowlette is now
raqu;,sting variances from this setback
requi.-ement for an addition to this existing
struct+re. The proposed 36' X 28' addition
consists of a dining room, second eating space
anj a two car garage. The setbacks of the
proposed addition would be f'6 ft. from the
lakeshore and 20 ft. from _ae street property
line.
Therefore, the variances requested would he
9 ft. from the lakeshore setback reauirement
and 30 ft. from the street setback requirement
and variance from the 75 ft. lakeshore hardcover
setback of 378 sq. ft. for the rroposed
addition for a total of 778 sq. ft. of hardcover.
The existing structure includes a 20' X 20' concrete
patio deck facing the lakeshore. 1.r. Rowlette
has agreed to remove this 400 sq. ft. of
hardcover and replace same with a larger open
redwood deck if the :,etback variances are approved.
The maxim= area of this proposed addition
extendinq into the 75 ft. lakeshore setback
would not exceed 200 sq. ft. This would result
in a net decrease of hardcover of 200 sq. ft.
Planning Commission fleeting - April 5, 1976
CONDITIONAL uSJ' PER;IIT
1960 Lakeview Terrace
(Continued)
VARIAMCE
3775 Bayside Road
The Comission recommended to the Council approval
of the lakeshore and street setback rerruest
conditioned upon removal of the 20' x i0'
concrete deck being replaced by a non -pervious
type deck because the City would gain a 200 sq.
ft. decrease in hardcover. (Continued)
Lk
Cl rY J: 0RIA) Pf-72T AJ'PLICATI7% _ ......
C I: _ _ ;' J •.� i �1'_ _+4P_PL�ICA7_I1
Rn t.D r r O�C7L'
0 24 WtPate 911
-yyy
I a . •.r.��r�
o►e er use- 4-.- J...rl C-.-1- C
-
s � I C a•1dT�a 2s'i S 0� f iz -
(ti�~,.,FZ.�I,, I'.7 • .-•' I 3Uiidd=y��.��J�.. V.' �wie�•-4•,
tape tip, rsto Insp.
PRLMCTPAL SMJCIURB ME - — -
Bsmt: Fln Arra Win P.rea
gene: ._-.--------- ___.
Hain Flr: MthIl Depth 2� G _ Alva-JYL J3i1
Meer _
.�" 2nd Fir: Width 10 Depth 1 Z Ara+ Izo -_pqN
5ets�2
Width L D•*e,2 ,__ .tea sss _ - s�•.
za:rx; etc, ektm
A7*-t +.�+� 's Set. Gmtm-tlant wbe 00:,�. `
darlwce Tot ?►idth Depth area_ rtt«K'fi',
mod, ikC LTritsMWn: Yes Np
LK t'wb. Mletlanda: Yes ';o
77.0 Roar"' {X?fUM i'r.A.
Side �' —
/ APPLI LIT."S .n) !TT W01 iri15 E+M•`:
�t /of lk ( 2 Q)PIFS z MAX Dr•MN r, `MCA L , A w
XMV. OF W T 7be trade rs i Iw d hdi 4v'y makes
IiA`t l i.. i �" FF F , '
�e :+`b'y rnatiea et':Ql t:.a ._ oZ fo_ tw �-_.�' d-
t y I ing pen2it for the work- desz2ibel, aC eeeN riu -J'
--- *Ork in strict serordamn with the ordi:wxes ,�t --';e
t.
1e ( City of *?rcno and nuinRs a. Vw agate :;uildi-w Cow
nivisien, and doclam teat &I: rags s:ic! rc-,�rwc:�
Per..t .aa tatiols stated heron are tree s'.d c� rrrc t .
MAI Pavi^ its "�•��-
State 3%.-MharQe
To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley
Orono Planning Commission Members
City Administrator Bernhardson
From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator
Date: August 8, 1988
Subject: #1314 Gerald & Candace Rowlette, 3775 Bayside Road -
Variance - Puolic Hearing
Application - Street setback variance to construct 4.5' x 12' sunroom
addition.
Zoning District - LR-IA, 2-acre, insewered
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A - Application
Exhibit B - Plat Mat --
Exhibit C Property Owners List
Exhibit D - Survey With Staff Notations
Exhibit E - Plans & Elevations Showing Proposed Location of Sunroom
Exhibit F - Documentation From 1976 Variance Approval
Pertinent Facts -
1. Street. Setback:
Required = 50'
Existing - 21' (at addition location)
At Addition Site:
Proposed s 15'
Variance - 31' or
2. The proposed sunroom "fills in" an existinq indentation in the North
wall of the house.
3. Hardcover:
Total Exijtinq Hardcover = 4,085 s.f.
Total Hardcover Allowed on Property = 4,850 s.f.
(25% of 75-250' zone)
Proposed Changes: No Change Proposed -- Sunroom is over existing
rock and plastic.
,. Note that the 1976 variance atproval to add garage, rooms, and deck
partially in the 0-75' zone was conditioned upon removal of 20'x20'
concrete patio. That patio has never been removed.
tN 1 f GM�Ti 4e, �► � 3 1 PAO f e ---
r tr ' vt Ar'L:L B `*S opSr,.Vvw: aet C. 'TZa 6 ,-4pf r a► x —
Toning File #1314
August 8, 1988
Page 2 of 2
Discussion -
The westerly portion of this house was originally constructed in 1969.
In 197G, the Rowlettes requested and were granted variances to allow
construction of room additions, an attached garage, and a new deck. The
original house was constructed partially in the 0-75' zone prior to the 75'
setback requirement adopted in 1975. In exchange for variance approval to
allow the room, garage, at:d deck additions in 1976, the applicants were
required to remove a 20'•c:10' concrete patio located about 40' from the
shoreline. This patio has never been removed.
Because the existing house is constructed with "wing -wall" extensions
about 2' out from the house, with overhangs, the proposed sunroom will not
appear to extend any closer to the road than the existing house, aL can be
seen from the plans submitted. There would not appear to b� any
significant impacts on the character of the neighborhood, and no light, air
or open space .is encroached upon. The hardship would be the location of
the existing house and the narrow nature of the lot which allows virtually
no usable building envelope without variances.
Staff Recommendation -
Based on the information noted above, staff would recommend approval
of the proposed sunroom addition, subject to removal of the 20'x20'
concrete patio on the lake side of the house, such patio to be removed
prior to issuance of a building permit for the sunroom.
r r;/ 1 I. .'% T q , 1�' `) I fit. rr
�A- PO
1
It
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 15, 1988
ZONING FILE #1313 CONTINUED
Bellows stated that she would like to see an overall
decrease in hardcover because applicant is adding a structure.
She said she would hold fast to her definition of a porch with
storms being an additional structure. Kelley stated that based
lipon staff's calculations, hardcover totalled 29.6%. Johnson
asked whether applicant was only going to remove 3' from the
concrete patio. He suggested removing more than that. Applicant
stated that would be acceptable. Daffron stated that if you just
look at trade-offs in round numbers, they are close. Kelley
suggested using 27 % in the 0-75'. Gaf f ron stated t.,at in the 0-
75' zone 1% would equal approximately 91 s.f. which would be 10'
by 10'. Gaffron asked if the recommendation was a 32 s.f.
reduction overall? Bellows stated that the odd shape of the
proposed deck was making it difficult to translate t;.a
percentage.
It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to recommend
approval of the variance providing that the hardcover it the 0-
75' zone did not exceed 29.6%. Motion, Ayes=6, Nays=O, Motion
passed.
#1314 GURALD ROWLETTE
3775 BAYSIDE ROAD
VARIANCES
PUBLIC HEARING 8:45 P.M. - 8:52 P.M.
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were
noted.
The applicants were present for this matter.
Gaffron explained that the Rowlettes were proposing to
construct a sunroom on the north side of the existing house. The
sunroom would be located so it would f i 11 an indentation along
the outside north wall of the house. The applicants were granted
variance approval in 1976 for the addition of a garage, rooms and
deck which extended partially into the 0-75' zone. The approval
was conditioned upon removal of a 20'x 20' concrete patio and
replacing it with redwoci. This has not been done. Applicants
are currently seeking a street setback variance where the
standard for this 2-acre zone is 50'.
Kelley stated that he had no problem with the sunroom,
however he did not like the fact that applicants had not complied
with the removal of the patio, per the 1976 variance approval.
He stated that based upon that, he should vote to deny approval
of this :request. He asked the applicants if there was a specific
reason why they had not removed the patio. Mr. Rowlette stated
that since 1976 they have removed other hardcover structures that
would equal removal of the 20' x 20' patio. He stated that he
did not rer-•►e the patio because they get an ice build up in that
location 7e cannot be chipped off of a redwood deck without
ruinin °k. Kelley asked applicant for his opinion as to
12
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 15, 1988
ZONING FILE #1314 CONTINUED
removing the concrete pi�io at this time. Applicant stated that
he would still have the save prrblcm with the ice.
Mr. Rowlette stated that the only reason they are in need of
this addtion is due to a new road being built directly across
from their kitchen. The addition will act as a screen from
headlights shining in their house from this new driveway.
Bellows statea that she had a problem with the appropriateness of
using the greenhouse addition as a screen for incoming light.
Applicant stated that the addition would be made of a dark
plexiglass material. Applicant stated that he had a problem
understanding why there should be any concern. They were not
asking to add to the hardcover and asked why he needed approval
to perform this addition. Bellows stated that the existing house
was so far outside of the boundaries. They had already put one
addition on and now they were requesting another addition. Mrs.
Rowlette stated that the addition was merely a rounded glass
window that extends 4 1/2' from the house. It is being added to
fill an existing space on the outside gall of the house. She
asked what more the Planning Commission would need to see. Brown
asked applicants whether they reed the entire concrete patio to
take care of the ice build-up problem? Mr. Rowlette stated that
the patio was in two pieces and he could remove one part of it.
Kelley stated that understood the problem of trying to chip
ice from a wood surface. If applicants would be willing to
remove the portion of patio, he would approve the addition.
Bellows reiterated her concern about using a window to screen
light. Kelley asked applicant how a plexiglass window would
prevent headlights from shining in their kitchen window? Mrs.
Rowlette stated that the window would be a reflective, darkened
glass. Mr. Rowlette added that they would install trees and
bushes inside the greenhouse which would add to the screening
affect.
There were no comments from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Brown, to recommend
approval of the addition of the 4 112' sunroom, subject to the
condition that the patio on the south side of the house be
removed up to the felt line, which is equal the location of the
deck and runs parallel to the ho-ise. The patio must be removed
before the permit for the sunroom is issued. Motion, Ayes-6,
Nays-4, Motion passed.
9131S CONSIDB MANOR NpMLO MMERS' ASSOCIATION
1MRW"WTi0N OF MIi.i,UM DRIVE AND COUMTRXSIDB DRIVE
VAR ANC28
PUBLIC: ERARtMG 81-53 P.M. - d:S7 B.M.
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailinq were
noted.
13
ZONING FILE NO. 1314
CITY OF ORONO NOTICE. OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 pace of Notice: 8-17-88
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Gerald 6 Candace Row.lette COPIES TO:
3775 Bayside Road
Long Lake, MN 5535u
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance
-------------------------------------------------------------
DATE. OF MEETING: 8-15-88 VOTE: 6 For 0 Against
Planning Commission rec- ends the following:
Approval subject to conditions noted below.
NOT RS AND SPNCIAL CONDITIONS:
Approval of setback variance for glass -enclosed sunroom is
conditioned upon removal of south half of 20'x20' concreteslab, resulting
in a 209 s.f. reduction in hardcover in the 0-75' zone, prior to issuance
of building permit for the 3unroom.
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as:
City Council Auyust 22, 1988; meeting starts at 7:00p.m.
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commision
minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and
approval by the elanning Commission.
TO: Mayor Grabek,
Council Members,
City Administrator. Bernhardson
FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Plannina & Zoning Administrator
DATE: August 17, 1988
SUBJ: 01314 Gerald & Candace Rowlette, 3775 Bayside Road -
Variance - Resolution
Application: Street setback variance to coistruct 4.5' x 12' sunroom
addition.
Zoning LR-lA, 2 acre - unsewered.
List of Exhibits:
Exhibit A - Proposed Resolution
Exhibit B - Notice of Planning Commission Action Dared 8-17-88
Exhibit C - Memo 6 Exhibits of August 8, 1SP8
W scussion
Please review the memo and exhibits of Augus* 8, 1988. Applicants are
requesting a street setback variance to a'_low construction of a glass -
enclosed sunroom within an existing indentation of their house , which is
19' from the street right-of-way where a 50' setback is normally requ4 rn-d.
This sunroom will extend no further towards the street than the existing
house that surrounds it.
A variance was granted to the Rowlettes in 1976 to add the currently
existing garage and room addition. One of the conditions of that 1976
approval was rf.moval of the 20' x 20' concrete patio or, the lakeside of the
house. That patio was never removed. Planning Commission as part of their
recommendation for approval is recommending that the southerly 10' x 20,
section of that patio be removed prior to issuance of a building permit for
the sunroom. The applicant's have agreed tA&t this is acceptable to them.
they wish to keep the northerly 10' x 20' section due to winter ice
problems with their eppes'41*e+ access door.
10.'%. W C
staff endation
Staff recommends apprrva1 of a street setback variiance to allow a
sunroom to be constructed 19' from the street right-c,f -way and a hardcover
variance for Gerald i Candace Rowlette, 3775 Bayside Road, conditioned upon
remove 1 of the southerly 1.0' x 20' portion of concrete patio on the
lakeside on the house, prior to issuance of a building permit for the
sunroom. A resolution is attached for Council review.
MINUTES OF REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 22, 1988
ZONING FILE #1303-REZABEK CONTINUED
believe that approval of the variance would set a precedent.
It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by
Councilmember Nettles, to direct the City to draft a Resolution
approving the lakeshore setback variance. Councilmember Goetten
asked that language be added requiring approval for any
replacement of or repair to the fence. Callahan agreed to add
that stipulation to his motion. Nettles stated that he did not
think it was a good idea to include language that would
discourage the upkeep of property. Zoning Administrator Mabusth
suggested adding language that would encourage natural screening.
It would enlighten any future property owner as to the underlying
principles of the City. Goetten agreed, adding that the natural
environment was an attraction for persons moving to Orono.
Nettles stated that he would like to see the Resolution when
drafted, but he would second the amendments as suggested.
Councilmember Peterson stated that approval of the variance would
be setting a precedent and she would vote no. She would prefer
to see natural screening. Motion, Ayes=3, P•terson Nay. Motion
,passed.
1314 GSRALD ROi1LE?TB
3775 RAYSIDE ROAD
VARIANCE
B SOLUTION
Appl.irants were not present and had previously asked that
is matter be ta4ed.
It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember
Goetten, to table #1314 Gerald Rowlette. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=0,
Motion passed.
# 1315 COUNTRYSIDE MANOR HOMBUKKER' S ASSOCIATION
WILLOW DRIVE AND COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE
VARIANCE
FSOLUTION
The applicants were not present for this matter.
It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember
Callahan, to table #1315 Countryside Manor Homeowner's
A&sociation. Motion, Ayes-5, Nays-0, Motion passed.
# 1317 DUANE i NANCY vl"B".
1135 BROWN *OrAD SOUTH
VARIAIWI
RRSOLUTION #2468
Anplicant3 were present for this matter.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the applicants
were seeking a side setback variance and a street setback
6
&= - as - �d'
of �-�.ee-Q �.�-,�..�'
(14
I
Yowl-
A7 *IAIJ
�904w- e4wiV, "I
immon]
VO
&
;m
F
TO: Mayor Grabek
Orono Council Members
City Administrator Bernhardson
I
FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator
DATE: September 6, 1988
SUBJECT: #1314 Gerald & Candice Rowlette, 3775 Bayside Road -
Variance - Resolution - Addendum to Memo of August 17, 1988
PLEASE REVIEW THE MEMO AND THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION OF AUGUST 17, 1988
Since my August 17th memo, Mr. Rowlette has advised staff that the
concrete patio is actually in three 7'x20' sections parallellinq the house.
He is proposing to remove the most southerly 7x20' section and leave the 2
remaining sections (about 14x20' ) in place.
On 9-6-88 I visIted the property and verified the sectioning of the
patio, is trhee sections 19.5' in length and 6, 7'6" and 7'6" respectively
in width, and also noted that part of the deck is over the patio. this
resulted in my recalculation of existing hardcover (attached). Existing
hardcover on the property is 3966 s.f., about 2/5 of which is in the 0-75'
setback zone. Allowable hardcover on the property (25% of 75-250' zone
area) is 4850 s.f. Removal of the 116 s.f. patio section as proposed by
applicant will result in about 3820 s.f. total. hardcover. An approximation
of percentages would then be:
.4 x 3820 = 15k8 a.f./28,125 s.f. = 5.4% in 0-75'
.6 x 3820 = 2292 s.f./19,400 s.f. = 11.8% in 75-250'
To clarif• his reasons for wanting to keep the northerly sections, I
have asked Mr. Rowlette to provide a letter tating his position
(attached).
STAFF RION
While staff originally recommended removal of the entire 20'x20'
patio, discussions at the Planning Commission level resulted in a Planning
Commission recommendation to allow half of the patio to remain. This was
based on the applicant's existing problems with roof runoff leaving an ice
build-up in front of the basement access door, which results in the need to
chip ice from the concrete every winter. The applicant contends that it is
easier to chip ice from concrete then a wooden deck. .''e also suggests that
due to the approximately 3' roof overhang over that concrete, that the
single 6' wide patio section along the house would not be sufficient.
The attached resolution reflects a removal of the southerly 10'x20'
half of the patio. Conditions 1 an,' 2 and finding 3 (d) can he revised as
the Councils sees fit, to accommodate whatever portions of patio the
Council wishes to have removed.
Cite of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 249
A F.BSOLUTION GRANTING
A VARIANCE TO
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) AND
SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2
FILE #1314
WHEREAS, Gerald ✓` Candace Rowlette (hereinafter "the applicants")
are the owners of the property located at 3775 Bayside Road within the City
of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows:
Exhibit A, attached thereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance
to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the
construction of a sunroom addition to the existing residence, to be located
19' from the street lot line where a 50' street yard setback is normally
required, and a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow
additional structural hardcover on the property where a significant portion
of existing hardcover is in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone where no
hardcover is normally allowed.
Minnesota:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File f1314.
1. The property is located iz the I.R-lA Single Family Lakeshore
Residential Zoning District.
3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on August
15, 1988 and recommended approval_ o,: the proposed variance based upon
the following findings:
A) The proposed sunroom will extend no closer to the street than
the wing walls and roof line of the existing house, but will
merely fill in an existing indentation in the house.
B) The area where the sunroom will be constructed is all
hardcovered by decorative rock bed with plastic sheeting
underneath.
C) The proposed sunroom addition will not have any significant
off*ct on the character of the neighborhood nor will it encr )ach
upon any neighboring views of the lake.
Paqe 1 of 4
Cite of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CCUNCIL
NO. 2492
D) The applicants were granted a variance in 1976 to construct
major additions to the house, which were approved at that time
conditioned upon removal of a 201x20' concrete patio on the Lake-
shore side of the house. That patio has never been removed. The
applicants' hardship in needing that patio or a portion of it
relates to ice build-up and winter access to the house in
conjunction with his existing wooden deck. The existing concrete
slab is in three separate units, and the southerly portion can
easily be removed without causing damage to the remaining
portion. This will result in a 146 s.f. reduction in hardcover
in the 0-75' zone.
E) Although the total hardcover on the property is less square
footage than would be allowed within the 75-250' zone, the fact
that a significant portion c` that hardcover i3 in the 0-75' zone
is ample justification for reduction of 0-751•hardcover,
especially in this case where that hardcover was previously
required to be removed.
4. The City Council has considered this application including the
findings and recommendations of the Plannit,g Commission, reports by
City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed
variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community.
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this
property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other
property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not
adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard
or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a
convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demon-
strable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial
property right of the applicants; and wou: d be in keeping with the
spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the
City.
CO®CLOSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono
City Council hereby grants a variance per Municipal Zoning Code Section
10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of a sunroom addition
located 19' from the street lot line where a 50' street yard setback is
normally required, and grants a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to
allow additional structural hardcover on the property when a significant
portion of the existing hardcover is in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone,
subject to the following conditions:
Page 2 of. 4
1948.
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
1. The applicants shall remove the southerly 7.5'xl9.5' portion of
the concrete patio in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone, and no
building permit for the sunroom shall be issued until the concrete
patio section has been removed.
2. Hardcover on the property is allowed as follows (in 0-75' and 75-
250' zones):
Existing
House =
1,509
s.f.
Existing
Attached
Garage
552
s.f.
Existing
Driveway
=
552
s.f.
North 2/3
of Existing Patio
263
s.f.
Existing
Deck Not
Over Patio
329
s.f.
Existing
Walkways
& Rock Beds Underlain by Plastic
= 615
s.f.
Sun Room
Addition
s (c•,er existing hardcover)
---
------------
TOTAL 3,820 s.f.
(per Exhibit B, attached)
The applicants are advised that the maximum allowable hardcover on the
property is 4,850 s.f., and that no additional hardcover will be
allowed in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone.
3. Authorities granted with this resolution run with the property not
with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by
application for a building permit within one year of the date of
Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (September
12, 1989).
4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and
conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the
zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted
herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
5. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree
to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their
heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this
resolution in the chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 12th day of September,
Page! 3 of 4
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO 2 4'9
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this I a X�k day of r 198 F
before me a Notary Public wit n and for said county, personally
appeared known to me to be
the persons) described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as
his (their) free act and deed.
(�� &V-"J�E
NOTARY PURLIC
NAA
/00'kN OLIVE .:;El PETEnM
NOTARY '-:4,IC MINNESOTA
` - NE`WPIN COUNN
MY
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of , 198 , before me
a Notary Pu lic within and for said County, personally appeared
known to me to be the
Person s escribe n and who executed the foregoing instrument,
and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his
(their) free act and deed.
NOTARY PUBLIC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
Page 4 of 4
�` ' , �•` 10►,� �'ll� f% A ti>C1G� 1 L'TjGly� 249::
Certificate of Survey: '
I hereLf nertify that this is a tru•i and cosroct
ren:•esantr,tinn of surrey of t.ho tx�am•t�tri c of (A)
%�
I 1A;ts 5, 6, 7, 8, 13, 15, if , 19, 20, 2.1, 22, 23, and 24,
Ott.ov i L le on Ls .us Mi nne tonkrs ,
V h i AC:J' beat ,art Lf ,;s:id Lots li, 11, 19, 20, 31, tin-1 22 hint:
Sruthurl- of a line drpowm nenallel w1U; unri 30 fu,st horthcesturly,
re.-iri -d at right anr+ier., fret: a lino iierp>.irui.'tar rss:e rasa tr r.r
"Linty N", a,sid "Lino rill Loin, detirritxn'. uc fnl oa:b: Cc:m-nrint- ut the
I I:orthwust corner of the :southeast quarter of thew NorU,we.t rivart.er of' :icc-
►.ion 5, Tc:muhi•r 117 Morth, Mnnpe 23 ''A:st of UJo 5th :'rincirwil tiurldlar.; thence
5casth nionr the Must lino of said :southeast gr.nrter of the, l'ort.':wa: t quart :r a
distance of 234 reset; ehsmne dee:lectinp, right 1,F deMca a dictancti o" 90 Pout. to
tho point of i,el,inrinp o:' said "Line T'; theme deflartint Tuft b. daproes to tl.0 south-
erly ex -tension of the ISnst line of said 1,ot 15, -ind arrid ".fine Li" Vcore ending;
(8) Tlwt ;cart of take 'flaw .Avenue anti Lake Street ns dedlesattt;f c,n tho skit of i ttoville or. Lmke :Urinetookz, rlearrlbe.i as
fcllo,": Corraencint at the f ortl,ere:,t corner of the fort^:r-st (;etartcr e f :ierctirn 5, 'tca••m1il , 117 Corth, .,,-nrn 23 'Jost of
the W. Frincl-Al Eeridian; thence :south nlonr the &tat Linu of ::aid ?'orthwe-t quarter a disturca of 14-')0.28 fe-A; thonea
deflecting left 64 daprees 30 Anutor a dirtanre of 10.7' feet tc th^ xint 0' 1•ei-irninl of :t line heroinmftor referred to
as "Line A"; tnenco deftcetirr right 1Lr daprees slost;• L•niii "Lines fill n rlist-rce of inn feet; ttcnre ulonF a tvn; r:tiai
curve to thn left having it radius: of 5(0 fast rand central snple of 22 depr•-e•s 30 rrinueca a dis'.sr.ne of l(t6.15 1 -et: ti,.ance
Westerly tanrent tr said curve a distance of 802.5 feet; thence: :ilonh ;a tangential curve to the left having t; radius of
)OC feet and central anfle cf 45 de;;rerta a distance or 235.02 feast; thsrnro ;south%oesterly tanf•t-rt ;,o Lest.-snld curve to a
point. on the kt,-zt line of tt," :.oath -not runrter of anid NiorV,wnst uuartur of :;•action 5, and said "Line A" t:rere endinfs,
self otviint, poin-. beinf• th+: ;,oint of bupinr.inF of the ;srr7-,.r ty iseir,, iiescriterl, thence Hrrthuat.t.:rlnlonp sni : ":sine A"
to its intersection with the Northerly oxtereinn of t.l-o I.Asterly liny of Tt.ere;a Street in srtlei PL,t of Cttovill, on iyKe
VinnetcrOte; thonee southerly along avid rort';erly extonslon tc the Scuthurl:• lint: of acid Like View Avenue; thence Scuth-
westerly along sstid Sout:•orly lino cf Lreke View Avenue to the linty of sni'. h,ka Street; thence South sting said fiat
line of Lake Stmet to its intersection with a line drnwn parallel with and 30 feet korthesaterly, me-isurod at right angl0s,
from a line hermin-+fter referred to ns "Line 6", said "Line f!" twins; desr_riuerd as follows:
Cowenncint' at then Northwast corner of suid Souttu:,est ssautrGer of use t:urt.:,west quart.ur; team,) .;outn :,lung the ',6-st line
of said Southeast quarter of the 1.orthwest a»artmr a diats,nre of 234 feet; thence Jufloctinf riN;ht 4E le;;roes a listaney
of 10 foot to t!w print of Iaa;Anninp of sstid "Lino H"; .hCnret riefla,-tint, left. 83 depraeo to 3ei41 bast line cf Lake
3trest, and ssai : "Lino 3" there anding,
(hence Nnrthwrsterlr along er.icl .7nrallel linst to its intersertion with suid 1:ost line cf ti.n �;outhse.sst gtwrtasr of thu North-
west quarter; thence North along fluid bloat line to tho ;-ooint a tset-inning, w.sU-IT that jert of unici auv-e-c:ocariLeet property
lying Northerly or a line 33 feet Southurly of, monsured at rit;ht angles to and parollol with, said "Line A";
W That -art of the Northesst quarter of the 3outhweat gewrtor of the llorthwast quarter or :;ectlur; 5, Townshio 117 leorth,
Range 2) least of the 5th Princionl !k'ridian, lyinf Southeasterly of a lino hereinafter referred to as "Line A" and Ncrth-
easterly of a line hereinafter referred to as "Line 9", eaicl "iAne A" anti "Line 110 being deserilsed as follows:
Cowmencing at the Northeast errner of ae:d Northa!tat quarter of the Southwet;t quarter of tlx tbrthwest (,muter; thence
South along the East line of said Northeest quarter ar the `Southuest quarter of the NortJtweat ,lautrter it disuinoe of 234 feet
to the point of baginninp of said "Lima A"; thence dwflort'ny right 48 degrees a distance of 90 feet tc a point, and said
''Elea A' there ending, said point being the point of beginning of ►said "Line B"; thence deflecting le:t't 63 degrees to said
iPent line, and said 'Line A" the„ a ne i nr ,
1lLCW1 that part thereof lyln#, soutxwestLrly.of a line drawn parel:sl with and 30 fast Nort..heastarly, measured at right
a W1a •, fuser said Line t3" suhjeet ,.a an existing easement f ~ rase' purposes,
i
►
sox Lx
, � . y
3o.S' � �
it AA4.
-r� lcoI I Pb
wt
O, ► !Ai
^Det-9 NPOID , Pftn o -jo t
MINTITES OF RLZULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 12, 1988
ZONING PILE #1313-ELLER CONTINUED
Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron gave
more details involving this application and showed the Council
where the remcvals and replacements of hardcover would occur.
Councilmember Goetten mentioned that she had visited the
site and though} that the applicant's proposal improved the
present s4:.uation. She appreciated the fact that the Ellers were
removing 3s much hardcover as they were installing.
It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2491. Motion,
Ayes-5, Nayes=0, Motion passed.
#1314 ;RRALD ROWLETTE
3775 BAYSIDE ROAD
VARIANCE
RWOLUTION #2492
Applicants were present for this matter.
City A-ainistrator Bernhardsno explained that the Rowlet.tes
were seeking a street setback variance for the purpose of
installing a sunroom. The sunroom would be located in an
existing indentation along the north outer wall of the house.
The main issue is hardcover and a patio that the Rowlettes were
to have removed in accordance with a variance granted in 1976.
The Planning Commission recently recommended approval of this
current application based on the removal of half of the concrete
patio. Since that time, it had been determined that the patio
was split into three sections rather than two.
Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron
indicated or, a diagram the configuration of the patio.
Councilmember Callahan questioned why the Planning Commission did
not have any concarn over the number of concrete slabs.
Applicant stated that he had informed the Planning Commission
that there were two slabs, but upon re-examining the patio, found
there to be three slabs. Applicant stated that he would like to
remove the outer slab, which would n,-�an a removal of less
hardcover than recommended by the Planning Commission.
Mayor Grabek asked applicant why he had not previously
removed the concrete patio as directed by the City. Mr. Rowlette
stated that he had an ice build-up problem in that area. He
could remove the ice from the concrete surface, but could not
chip the ice from a wood deck. Mayor Grabek arcked Mr. Rowlette if
he would also find a reason for not complying with the City
should they redirect him to remove a portion of the patio.
Applicant stated that he and the Planning Commission had
discussed this issue and the slab would have to be removed prior
to the issuance of the building permit for the sunroom.
Cj.ty Administrator Bernhardson rei!--erated that applicant was
requesting that only one-third of the concrete patio bE rem(ved
6
MINUTES OF REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETIh' "EPTBMBER 12, 1988
ZONING FILE #1314-ROWIJM"n CONTINUED
as opposed to one-half. Gaffron stated that the resolution could
be revised to reflect the Council's decision as to the extent of
removal. The resolution currently directs that one-half of the
patio be removed.
It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmembei
Goetten, to amend Resolution #2492, to direct that applicant
remove the most southerly 7' x 20' section of patio, which will
leave two temaininq 7' x 20' slabs. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays-0,
Motion passed.
#1315 COUNTRYSIDE MANOR HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION
WILLOW DRIVE AND COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE
VARIANCE
ABSOLUTION #2493
Mr. Phil Miller was present as a representative for the
Countryside Manor Homeowner's Association.
City Administrator Bernhardson informed the Council that
applicant was seeking a variance to construct entrance monuments
for Countryside Drive that exceed the 3 1/2' neight requirement.
The City and Homeowner's Association previously-iscussed the
issue of signage on the monuments and determined that there would
be none.
Mr. Miller reported that the homeowner's Association had
prepared some elevations and drawings of what tney were
proposing. The Association had no plans to include any signag,,
for the monuments and had no problem adhering to the. City's
determination.
Mr. Miller also addressed the situation involvinq
undenireable behavior on behalf of one of the Associatior.
members. During a Planning Commission Meeting, this person made
rude ccmments pertaining to the Planning Commission. Mr. Millar
stated that this person was out of line and he extended an
apology on behalf of this individual. Councilmember Goetten
thanked Mr. Miller for his apology and stated that she had been
seated eirectly in front of the individual. Councilmember
Callahan reiterated Councilmember Goetten's comments.
It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, .•conded by
Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #24'' Motion,
Ayes-S, Nays-0, Motion passed.
#1316 GARY BARR
3034 CASOU POUR ROAD
VARIAMC=
Applicant vas present for this matter.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained that -he applicant
7
APPLICATION NO. 1314
CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal ^ay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 9/21/88
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Gerald 6 Candace Rowlette COPIES:
3775 Bayside Roac.
Long Lake, MN 55356
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance
-------------------------------------------------------------
DATE OF KENTING: 9/12/88 VOTE: 5 For 0 Against
COUNCIL ACTION - NOTION:
Council voted unanimously to approve the requested variance subject to
removal of the southerly 7'6"xl9'6" section of concrete pa,�;o. The
resolution for approval has been revised to reflect that. condition. A copy
of the revised resolution is attached.
Please arrange to sign the 3 original resolution copies at the City;
Offices (Monday through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30). P11 persons with an interest'
in the property fnust sign the resolutions.
Variance Approval is limited to*the extent shown on approved plan and as
noted in the approval resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to
furt,,er review by the City. Variance approval expires one year after date of
approval. Permit application must ue submitted no iater than
September 12, 1989.
You must apply for and obtain a building permit prior to commencement of
construction. (The building permit application is a separate application
from the zoning variance or conditional. use application.) #
If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they
are available from the City Recorder or City Clerk after review and approval
by the City Council.
WAYNE O.POPNAM
RA+MONO A HAIK
R00CR W. SCHNOBRICH
*ENV C• KAUFMAN
Roat PT A MINIS.
ROLIRC A. WOROCN
O. MARC WMITCHEAO
BRUCC O. WILLIS
FREDERICK S. RICH •R01
O. RO BC RT JOHNSON
O ANY R. MACOMSCR
ROBERT S. SUNK
M U'3H V. 0 L U
NKCTT, :II
r RCOE RICK C BROWN
THOMAS A. BERG
JAM CS R. STCILCN
JAMCS B. LOCKHART
ALLCN W. HINO CRAKCR
CLI►FORO M Ow[EN[
O. WILLIAM KAUFMAN
M ICMAC L O. rRCCMAN
I+OWARO SAN MYCRB. III
LARK♦ O. [SPCL
JANIC S. MAYCRON
THOMAS J. BARRCTT
POPHAM. HAIK,SCHNOBRICH S KAUFMAN, LTG.
3300 PIPER JAFFRAI TOWER
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55402
JAMES A PAYNE
TCLCPNONC
O RANOALL ROYER
OAVIO A JONES
6IZ-333-A800
BRIAN N.JOHNSON
.EE C SHCCHY
"MOTHT w AUCA
AL-4 FRICON
T[LCCOPIEP
CAROLB SWANSON
L[SLIC 01-LIETTE
'431 OIS-334-2713
BRUCC A PETEeSON
MI C N At T. NI LAN
-321 S12-33.-278,
JULIC A. SWEITIER
ROBERT H. LYNN
THOMAS C. MICLENMAUSCN
THOMAS M. SIPKINS
1311612 -334-2S03
MICHAEL O.CMRISTCNSON
R000 RT C MOILANEN
J. MICNAC� SCHWARTZ
THOMAS F NELSON
TOOO M JOMNSOM
THOMAS J RAOI0
SUITE 2400
JEFFRCY P. CAIRNS
OAVID L.HAIHMALL
1200 SCVCNTCENTH STREET
LOUIS P. SMITH
KATHLC EN M. MARTIN
OCNVCR, COLORAOO 00201
BRUCE M. LITTLE
J OHN C CHILOS
MARK r P3
DOUOLAS P. SEATON
TELEPMONC 303-493-1100
00
RUB BOLL 1 PONESS^
TNOMAB C 1ANNER
TELECOPIER 30.11-4093-2104
BRYAN L. CRAWFORD
RICHARD A. KAPLAN
MATTMCW C. DAMON
BRUCC B M-PHCCTEMS
SUITE 300 SOUTH
JOHN N PROVO
1 COT, [. RICHTER
,BOO M STREET, H. W.
CLLCN SUC PARKER
PAUL J. LINSTROTH
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036
OREGORY 0. aMOOKCR
SCOTT A.:MIT.
TCLCPMONC 202-088-5300
WILLIAM M. OJILC. JR
OONALO LCWIS
TCLCCOPICR 2OZ-B2B-531B
T[He C[ A. COSTCLLO
H
EL12ABCTM A. THOMPSON
JOSCPN O. VASS
KCI+N J. MALLELAND
(DIRECT DIAL NUMBER
BRIAN W. OHM
MARK B.PCTERSON
(612) 334-2549
ST[VCN A. CN CLCSNIK
February 7, 1989
Ms. Jeanne Mabusth
CITY OF ORONO
P. 0. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Dear Jeanne:
OeCOORY 1,. SCOT,
ROSANNE O ZA10CNwCBCR
ROBERT C CASTLC-
TNCRCSC M HANKCL
—JL1C FLCMINO- OL►C
DCBOIRAN A. C,YSON
ZACMCRY M. JONCS
SCHSON K. NIMITNCY
KATMRYN M. wALKCR
OCOROC — SOCHA
SMANC R. ACLLCY
SUSAN M, V E19
MARK P.
TCN CYCK
OUANC R NOCCACR
OF COUNitL
,*CD -MORRISON
•ADrI♦+tD �N �D+Iw
•wDMlTltO IN '.LINOIi
Listed below are re-olutions which have been filed _n
torrens property with the Registrar of Titles and returned.
Name
Resol. No. Doc. No.
Date Piled
Backerud, Rodney -
North Arm
Aasoc. 2302 1990970
February
1, 1989
fi
��
CattEi�e 2492 1990970
January
26, 1989
o n (COT
4496296) 2530 1990969
January
26, 1989
If you have
any questions, please feel
free to call
either
me or my secretary,
Paula van De Laarschot (334-2656).
Very tru1- yours,
2; ��iu L
Nancy R. Rusnik
Legal Assistant
InV3(1)
k
4
I
A_^ AAL'e5
tmkDWVelR-
1a
28.3 x Y2.3
-A1/97 s L
.,
12 it E. (.,
. 312.
G titac�
2'V )12 �
_ !g s z
Drt�v �'9
2 3 x 2 `/
= 552-
LC)
It zzo
zt
Iry
0...
/NCI• Sia&44COA $x.3C.; 4�io S,
A40t,m Arc - Rew 2, x 7 S_
Abc
wc•%r of
-MrA L �.•
--------------
7
t
Nam' c)
Rbmover i
lo' x2of sF�'� 1
r••
Spa f-,p4<
N'i't l i19� •'M s-7�' r S/'�wa.X 3$Q'��v �to,yeo 54, .
PO,450 'L4.3 xVt 3 • �� c �. > >. �retvJoN� r hurt s
12 Y G► S AL owvo F� f ��( ! 7 s� .
G /- L�1 >< z 3 - S S 2 1 LJENT
wt�w�s Room 4
. / S 70 !1(yt»T1ANS /r� p.ls',
T7u+.ri 2Zx2`i 57 G�Xt��'�" P. Pknvf:.kae� w•i rb as
O e ac J � s
Z
yt ►�c q r 5�� U
UNTY ROAD NO _ - R-----°-�_�-ss�
84
CO _
�k.st ��O tl9.9S ' ink A-
.._-
TTi
0
iAd
•-•'
e •. /
r
e4vi of etror GibIL
a
O V 4v
.•� t 1D M"U4 LOW E%C. of Loft "Oft L.:rE cr Sav'f 04T►ip•
TI
i �
s
.OTtow,. Ov6 a rb�
'Batt pro ri" f • V
i I IV*AAA SD'; 31.
IZ wxPc I a."0 i
rxcmvL sra.►
tru PeOC.«A AV "vs 4 F
V41, eaxv-vc p ?%.Vftk
rok-Mv& 1i ` •is ,, ` *
*$OKA RAT&
�KOA � ov
rp,v,e c VAIL
•yr 'rsC 1'i
:.,Mlra%
51�►t�c-� t-'caT�'z '
ALL 9*%411 SIVIIJ4 lb do
Atrr W It D d-r o VJ r 9 IL, AL-T.
' Tic 1 "1 161A. FR' i %-L- E
MT EL"Miarg
1
T
i
i*_MIAOT §L ATIory
E"Wr OUGGG
E"clsT CA4c r- Erb s It
a¢c r-�b�jtr+
fft"Tsf $04V.MA*jVlS
fepj
l �.� �- � ray � i. ` _'. � • j � , � � � �
al
s '€
_ jam►. � ..- ..
c
1 }BRA
47
i
IG �''