HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketCITY OF ORONO
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
473-7357
APPLICATION NO. #2015
NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
Date of Notice: June 19, 1995
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Mr. and Mrs. Mark Harrington
4080 Bayside Road
Orono, MN 55359
COPIES:
------------------------------------------------------
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Conditional Use Permit/Variances
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE OF MEETING: June 12, 1995 VOTE: 4 FOR 0 AGAINST
-----------------------------------------------------------
COUNCIL ACTION -MOTION:
To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution previously mailed to you.
Please arrange to sign the 3 original resolution copies at the City Offices (Monday through
Friday, 8:00 to 4:30). All persons with an interest in the property must sign the resolutions.
Variance and conditional use approvals are limited to the extent shown on approved plan and as
noted in the approval resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to further review by
the City. The approvals granted in the above referenced resolution will expire one year after
date of Council's approval. A building permit application must be submitted no later than June
12, 1996.
Please contact Jeanne Mabusth if you have any further questions concerning the review of your
application.
lsv
CITY of ORONO
June 6, 1995
Mr. and Mrs. Mark Harrington
4080 Bayside Road
Orono, Minnesota 55359
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Harrington:
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
Municipal Offices
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
The enclosed approval resolution will be presented for Council's review and action at their June
12, 1995 meeting. Please contact staff prior to the meeting if you have any questions pertaining
to the findings and conditions of that resolution.
Sincerely,
n ?~J.c~ ~ ~4{,
Jeanne A. Mabusth
Building & Zoning Administrator
JAM/ch
Enc.
Telephone (612) 47'3-7357 • FAX 473-0510
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed:
Name Jeanne A. Mabusth
Title Building & Zoning Administrator
DATE: June 5, 1995
ITEM NO.:
Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: #2015 Mark Harrington, 4080 Bayside Road -Conditional Use
Permit/Variances -Resolution
Zoning District: RR-lA, minimum 5 acre requirement.
Total area = 5 + acres
Additional Exhibits
L -Applicant's Second Addendum 5/31/95
Brief Review of Application
For more detail on this review please refer to the staff memo of May 4, 1995 enclosed in your
packet and the Planning Commission minutes of the May 15, 1995 meeting.
The applicant seeks approval of a conditional use permit for a guest apartment within the upper
level of a 35'x44' addition to be placed to the northwest of the existing residence. The addition
will also require a street setback variance and height variance.
The property is located in the 5 acre zoning district requiring a 100' street setback. The existing
structure is located 50.1' from the street lot line. The proposed addition will be placed 64.9'.
Review Exhibits I and K, it is the intention of applicant to complete the construction of a new
residence within two phases. The first phase consists of a four stall garage and expanded living
area for his mother-in-law. The existing residence structure will be removed and a new
structure installed to the immediate east of the 35 'x44' addition. Based on the location of the
existing structure and the desire to move the proposed addition as far north as possible and
maintain a reasonable connection to the existing residence, the addition could not be placed at
the 100' street setback. The elevations begin to drop dramatically to immediate rear of addition.
The height •rnriance results as applicant must place 3 ½' of fill beneath the grade level ·garage
in order to aohieve the desired drainage. Drainage shall be directed to west and eventually to
the north in order to save mature trees in street yard that would have been destroyed if drive had
to be lowered to street elevation. Per the height definition the vertical height of the structure
must be determined at the garage level. The 3 ½' of fill and the vaulted ceiling design impact
the final determination of the legal height shown at 32½', refer to Exhibit E-1. The Planning
Commission did not recommend an alteration to the vertical design of the residence and found
the height variance to be acceptable.
Request for Council Action continued
page 2 of 2
June 5, 1995
Zoning File #2015
In the review of the conditional use permit for the guest apartment, members considered the
issue of internal access to the apartment area at the third floor. There are three accesses to the
apartment area, one via the patio doors at the lower level (via basement, review Exhibits E-2
and F-1). The second access was via the side garage door to a hallway that would lead to the
staircase to the upper level (review Exhibits 4 and F-2). Internal access is provided by the link
to the addition that consists of a mud room and expansion of the kitchen (review Exhibits E-4,
E-5, F-2 and G). Members concurred that at the time of the future addition of the remainder
of the principal structure that the current link would be removed. Based on the alignment of the
addition and the existing structure, it is impossible to provide internal access in any other way
but through the link as proposed.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the application as proposed
subject to the conditions set forth in the staff memo of May 4, 1995 and two conditions set forth
by Planning Commission at their meeting as follows:
5. Applicant to obtain a demolition permit for the removal of the accessory
structure, garage.
6. Applicant to provide a date at which time applicant proposes the removal of the
detached garage and the closing off of the existing drive. Review Exhibit L,
applicant's second addendum notes that both garage and drive will be removed
by January 1, 1996. Applicant wants to maintain the existing access and garage
during the period of construction. Applicant's property is not subject to
hardcover controls so applicant's retention of the concrete pad for a limited period
of time is of no issue for the City.
The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the
Planning Commission's recommendation.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
To either adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution.
ch
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
VARIANCES TO SECTION 10.27, SUBDIVISION 5 (A & B)
AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER
SECTION 10.27, SUBDIVISION 3 (A)
FILE NO. 2015
WHEREAS, Mark J. Harrington and Monica M. Harrington (hereinafter the
"applicants") are the owners of the property located at 4080 Bayside and legally described as:
Lot 1, Block 1, Popov Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the
"property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicants have made application to the City of Orono to permit
construction of a 35'x44' 2½' story addition proposed at a 32'6" height where the code would
allow 30' to be placed 64'9" from the street lot line where the code would require a 100' setback
and where the existing structure is located 50'. Per Section 10.27, Subdivision 3 (A) the
applicants have also made application for a conditional use permit to permit a guest apartment
within the upper level of the addition.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2015.
2. The property is located in the RR-lA Rural Residential Zoning District requiring
five acres in area. The subject property consists of 5 + acres.
3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 15, 1995 and
recommended approval of the variances to Section 10.27, Subdivisions 5 (A &
B) as proposed and a conditional use permit per Section 10.27, Subdivision 3 (A)
that would allow a guest house apartment within the upper level of the new
addition. The street setback and height variances were granted based on the
following unique findings and hardships:
Page 1 of 5
A. The subject property meets the minimum 5 acre requirement of the RR-lA
zoning district.
B. The existing residence is located 50' from the street lot line and an
addition could not be attached to the structure that would also meet the
required 100' setback.
C. The addition is located on the only feasible building pad as lot slopes
steeply to the north and the east and is heavily wooded with mature trees.
D. The present house was built in 1947 prior to current 5 acre zoning
standards established in 1975.
E. The existing detached two stall garage does not meet the needs of the
applicants' growing family and there is a desire to have an attached garage
with a family of young children.
F. The present detached garage will be removed and the existing driveway
restored to natural ground cover.
G. It is necessary to fill 3 ½' beneath garage floor in order to create positive
drainage away from structure.
H. The height definition requires that the vertical height be determined at the
existing elevation at the south side of garage.
I. The applicants propose a vaulted ceiling at the upper level. This type of
design also has an impact on the height determination.
J. The mature oak and spruce trees will buffer the peak of the roof from the
roadway and adjacent properties.
4. All standards of the guest apartment section of the code, [Section 10.27,
Subdivision 3 (A)] have been satisfactorily met with applicants' proposal.
Page 2 of 5
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar
to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that
granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would not merely
serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a
demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property
right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
6. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow a guest
apartment will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the
public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger
to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values
and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the
intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.27, Subdivision 5 (A & B) and per
Section 10.27, Subdivision 3 (A) grants a conditional use permit for a guest apartment subject
to the following conditions:
1. Existing septic system is to be upgraded from a three bedroom to five bedroom
mound system prior to occupancy of new addition.
2. The apartment may never be used for rental purposes but shall serve members of
applicants' family, domestic employees or nonpaying guests.
3. Utilities to addition shall continue to be metered through the utilities or meter
serving principal residence.
4. A separate address shall not be assigned for the occupants of the guest apartment.
5. Applicants have agreed to remove the detached garage no later than January 1,
1996. The existing driveway area shall be restored to natural ground cover by
June 1, 1996.
Page 3 of 5
6. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owner,
but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building
permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will
expire on that date (June 12, 1996).
7. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
8. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms
of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns,
hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the
property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 12th day of June, 1995.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor
Property Owner( s)
Page 4 of 5
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of June,
1995, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of
Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the
City.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this _____ day of __________ , 199 , before me a Notary Public
within and for said County, personally appeared -----------------known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this _____ day of __________ , 199 __ , before me a Notary Public
within and for said County, personally appeared ________________ _
known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.
Notary Public
Page 5 of 5
TO: Chair Peterson and Orono Plam1ing Commission Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
DATE: May 4, 1995
SUBJECT: #2015 Mark Harrington, 4080 Bayside Road -Conditional Use Permit/Variances
-Public Hearing
Zoning District: RR-lA. -Minimun1 5 acre requirement.
Total area = 5+ acres.
Pertinei,t · Ordinances
Section 10.27, Subd. 3 (A) [10.20, Subd. 3 (G-2)] -Conditional use permit for guest apartment
within upper level of addition.
Section 10.27, Subd. 5 (A) -Height variance.
Required = 30'
Proposed = 32.6'
Variance = 2.6' or 8.6%
Section 10.27, Subd. 5 (B) --Street setback variance.
Required = 100'
Existing = 50 .1 '
Proposed = 64.9'
Variance = 45.1' or 45.1 %
List of Exhibits
A -Application
B -Plat Map
C -Property Owner's List
D -Applicant's Addendum
El-5 -Elevations
Fl-3 -Floor Plans
G -Detailed Site Plan
H -Hennepin County Driveway Permit
I -Topographic Information
Jl-2 -Weckman Report/Septic Site Plan
K -Survey
Zoning File #2015
May 4, 1995
Page 2
Description of Request
The applicant proposes an approximate 35'x44' addition at the northwest of the existing
residence. The property is located in the 5 acre zoning district requiring a 100' street setback.
The structure will be located approximately 64.9' from the County Road right-of-way. The
existing structure was built in 194 7 prior to setback standards for residential construction and
prior to the 5 acre zoning standards adopted by the City in 197 5.
In 1984 the City granted a street setback variance for the detached garage located to the
immediate southeast of the residence.
It is the intention of the applicant to construct the larger addition and eventually raise the older
portion of the structure and reconstruct the residence immediately adjacent to the new addition
further away from the street lot line. Review Exhibit I, it is difficult to place structure further
north to meet the 100' setback because of the severe sloping topography.
In order to provide positive drainage from the garage elevation and create positive drainage to
the northwest of the new addition, it will be necessary to place approximately 3 1/2' of fill
beneath the garage. Based on the height definition, the vertical height will be determined at the
garage level. 3 1/2' of fill and the vaulted ceiling design impact the final determination of the
legal height now shown at 32 1/2', refer to Exhibit E-1.
Applicant has been asked to file a conditional use permit as the upper level of the three story
addition will contain an apartment area for applicant's mother-in-law. Review the required
standards for such use. Review Exhibit F-2, note the upper level apartment is connected from
a hallway that leads from the mud room and kitchen addition. A secondary grade level access
door extends through the garage that eventually connects to a doorway to that same hall.
Review Exhibit E-2, the rear elevation shows a lower level patio door leading to the rear yard.
Staff would suggest the primary access to the apartment would be from the access door leading
from the mud room.
An existing septic system was installed in 1987 and was designed to serve a three bedroom
home. Review Exhibits J-1 & 2, septic testing confirmed there is adequate area to serve a five
bedroom residence. The existing system will be upgraded to serve the additional two bedrooms
in the addition.
There is adequate parking on this 5 + acre site to serve parking needs for the additional guest
house unit.
Zoning File #2015
May 4, 1995
Page 3
Issues for Consideration
1. Is there adequate hardships to approve a height variance for the new construction?
2. Can simple design modifications be made to modify or remove need for height variance?
3. The steep topographies to the north and the need to provide a feasible connection to the
existing residence prevent applicant constructing an addition that would conform to the
required street setback. Do you agree?
4. Have the standards of the guest apartment use been satisfied?
Options of Action
To either approve or deny the conditional use permit and variances as proposed with the current
application. If members approve the application, the following conditions should be considered
in your motion:
ch
1. Existing septic system to be upgraded from a three bedroom to five bedroom
mound system prior to occupancy of new addition.
2. Apartment may never be used for rental purposes but shall serve members of
applicant's family, domestic employees or non-paying guests.
3. Utilities to addition shall continue to be metered through the utilities or meter
serving principal residence.
4. A separate address shall not be assigned for the occupants of the guest apartment.
15
CITY OF ORONO -GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION
fr
. :..;r ri:·
1-·• !LLf \
APPLICANT Phone (home) t/ 'i 9 -007 S-
Name yV}4(l.,k. HA fl{ll-I l1J b [0 /V Phone (work) '-/7 3 -7 f:,S-'7
Address 'jo r o Ip A-'( s ; O e. f2, J .4 0 City 0/J-0 NO Zip 5S-2 5""'1
OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) --------Name Phone (work) ------------------------Address City Zip -------------------------
FEES -CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS -
---$ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application
---$125.00 Residential Accessory Use
$200 .00 Institutional (church school etc.) -----""-v-$17.5.00 Guest Hous Guest Apartments
---
---
---
---
---
--
$150.00 Duplex Credit/ '
$250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use
$200 . 00 Land Alteration
Grading and filling -designated wetland or floodplain
Grading and filling -101 cu. yd. or more
Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 ' of lakeshore
PRD/PID -see Fee Schedule
$100.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application)
After-the-Fact Fee -Double Current Application Fee
OTHER APPLICATIONS
---$200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review ( + consultant fees)
$250 . 00 Vacation ---$17 5. 00 Easement Vacation ---$ 75 .00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision ---
---$300 . 00 Rezoning (PUD -refer to fee schedule)
---$300. 00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
---$100. 00 Appeals >< Other -see Fee Schedule
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
Present Zoning District ------
Present Use of Property X Residential
6
__ Other (specify) ______ _
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
1. __ Completed Application Form.
2. __ Describe request in detail.
3. __ Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from
Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center, 348-3271).
4. __ Plat Map.
5. __ Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) -refer to handout for survey
information.
6. __ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey.
7. __ Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve
changes in elevation (grades).
8. __ List of the legal names (include marital satus) of all persons with an interest in the
property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s).
9. __ Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements).
10. __ As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons
you wish notified of this application.
YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY
FOR REPRODUCTION (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS
SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be
submitted.)
The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your
application is not complete if the above information has not been included.
Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete.
Initials of Clerical Staff: _____________ Date ___________ _
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning
Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment)
and/ or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information
supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge.
Applicant's signature ________________ Date ________ _
OWNER'S SIGNATURE
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable
entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council
members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request.
Owner's signature _________________ Date ________ _
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning
Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled
review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting,
please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office
of this change prior to the meeting.
7
"''.--
~ ~
.• •·1--.. 6'.
/0.J 0,9,
3
( 24)
~06,
/"'s "'
F
(8)
~
~
~
(3)
'.{f. ···1
7iJ D
432 . 22
4
( 25)
, :;.:,:.
h-.:<'J~ "1
:_r',:·~J ·j;.
( ...
2
( 23)
224 . 77
fl
;,;
:8 ...
tr. co
~ ...
./
I
22 )
,, ... ·J· i . 1· .'
\ I
IT .;"..::.:___:_::::n
/
~ ~;~=-~ ~~
~~-------------r-:
: I
• I
,.., pf :
-· I
~
.,., ,..,
30
67 .31
(0
0,
N
N
~:
.. ·/
75
" <RI.
i::
"" ~
54
(4) 347. 14 N89'35'.
PART OF I ~-LOJ 55 ~
(7) ~
I 457
: 3
PT OF
~--LOT 53
"' ,;,-~ (14) tf'
~ ~ . ~ ,... --• In o l ,,
N89'~
~ ~ ~ ~ "' ~ :~ N z ~ . . ~ ~
,-,,. ,r. -~
56 -~ (TIJ 7
u,
0
\.--tJ .l.· ·,. j.,.. f;.1 30 1:n ~· ~ 3 ~ ; "'-
; C'l+}. . In
\ •1(,,, In
~ \··'(-1'( in
"' N
2
( 38)
t,'31. \,. ~7 •<j ,.,
s~:0 . ___. . \ . ---. ~
\ --\~.,-,/ ~ ...
:'
/ ( 9)
,) 291
537.01
: 2 533 .22 I
: 3
529. 43 I
457
4 ( 22) in .. ~ 525. 64 4S7
RUN DATE 0~/10/95
BATCH 501 cu\
.PROP ADDR
OWN ER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/AD DR
PROP ADDR
m'I NER NAME
TAXPAYER
N.O.ME/ADDR
PROP ADDR
OWN ER NAM E
TAX PAYER ·
NAME/ADDR
PROP ADDR
OW NER NAME
TAX PAYER
NAME/ADDR
38 05-117-23 22 0007
03960 BAYSIDE RD ·
MICHAEL G FILBRANDT
MICHAEL FILBRA NDT
3960 BAYSIDE RD
MAPLE PLAIN.MN 55359
38 05-117-23 23 0033
00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
MICHAEL G FILBR AN DT
MICHAEL FilBRANOT
3960 BAYSIDE RD
MAPLE PLAIN MN · 55359
38 06-117-23 11 0006
04 010 BAYSIDE RD
CURTIS & ELIZABETH LEVANG
·CURTIS & ELIZABETH LEVANG
4010 BAYSIDE RD
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
38 06-117-23 14 0022
04045 BAYSIDE RD
H & L BOON
HENRICUS C & CORNELIA A BOON
4045 BAYSIDE RD
ORO NO MN 55359 ·.
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM ·
PROPERTY OWN ERS LIST
REPORT NO : PI435401
PAGE 1
38. 05-117-23 23 0004
03965 · BAYSIDE ,RD
FRED BLA NCH JR
FRED BLAN.CH JR
3 96 5 BAYSIDE RD
LO NG LA KE MN 55356
38 06-117-23 11 0003
04 246 ·BAYSIDE RD
·vcI CAPITAL INC '
VCI CAPITAL INC
PO BOX 375
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 06-117-23 14 0014
04 080 BAYSIDE RD
M J & MM HAR RINGTON
MARK & MONICA HARRINGTON
.4080 BAYSIDE RD
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
38 06-117~23 14 0023
0<+105 BAYSIDE RD ·.
D L COHEN & J L LAMB ·
DEBRA L ·COJ-iEN
1 94 2 HU MB OLDT AVES
MPLS MN 55403
38 05-117-23 23 0020
00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
GREGGS & BETTE J PERL
GREGGS & BETTE J PERL
309,W LAKE ST .
LO NG LAKE MN 55356
38 06-117-23 11 0004
04050 'BAYSIDE RD ·
G & MCONNELL
GARY D CO NN ELL
4050 BAYSIDE RD
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
1 .
38 06-117-23 14 0021
.00:315 TO NK.AWA RD
F B BEN NETT & MM BENNETT
. F B SENNETT & ·M M BENNETT
315 TO NK AWA RD
ORONO MN 55356
TOTAL BATCH 501 00011
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE
REPRESENTATION OF INFOR MATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE HE NN EPIN COU NTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST
Of' m KNOWLEDGE ANO •:~::FJ /r3)35 BY ~ ~,.
___,..r.· .-..;
[j,~..Jj· .J,,.~r_ . .:,:_·;;\ I u '~
;~Jit~~::.~~~\
~
,,. i
... ...~--_-:,_Hl ,t:,,lW;,•,~~j'.;i" •..:c ~~ .... f,
The addition is necessary because our family has doubled in size in the past year from 3 to 6.
My mother-in-law has moved in and we had twins.
Why a garage with a second floor and basement?
We now have four vehicles and need the extra garage space. We located the garage to the north
of the house for several reasons:
♦ The present detached double garage is on the south side of the house and blocks the
southern winter sun.
♦ The addition is located on the only logical building pad. The lot slopes steeply to the north
and east and is heavily wooded with mature trees.
♦ The present house was built in 1947 on 25 acres before the advent of the 100 foot setback
requirement and 5 acre zoning requirements.
♦ Desire to have on attached garage.
♦ The long range plan includes saving the garage and addition and demolishing the present
house to build a new house on the site.
♦ The present detached garage will be given to a friend and moved off the site. The present
driveway will be obliterated as per county permit.
~ Building height as proposed is 29' 4".
~ Variance request arises because garage floor cannot be built at present grade.
~ Present location of house dictates location of addition.
~ Site slopes from front to back, grade at the front of site is approximately 30" below front
yard.
~ Building code requires the garage floor to be at least one foot above lowest point of
driveway.
~ Since the front yard is level, logic dictates that the garage floor be one foot above the front
yard. This places the garage floor about 42" above the present grade. However, it will
only be 12" above the front yard and at the same level as the present house when the
project is completed. This makes the building height 32' 9".
~ I believe the intent of code is to prevent building a house on top of a mound of soil to get
around the building height rules. This is clearly not the case here.
~ Present mature Oak trees prevent excavating the front yard to make a swale for proper
drainage for the driveway.
~ Mature Oak and Spruce trees will hide the peak of the roof from most of the frontage.
(>I
?-' ~j I -
~
~ ___,. ___,.
-
0
' 0
0 ---
1'
1l
___,.
co
-
0
0
0 -
, ' '
JI
___,.
___,.
-
0
0
0 -
1'
I I I I I
,r
,lbd] lL,JJ l.L,jJ ~
D D D D
D D D D
D D D D
D D D D
D D D D
D D D D
D D D D
I I I I I I
I I I I I
□ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □
I I I I I I I
I I I I I
D D D D
D D D D
D D D D
D D D D
D D D D
D D D D
D D D D
D D D D
I I I I I I
,_
__ ,
lD
-
~-f-----0----~-
' 0
0
Ul n
0
(D
(_pJ
~
11
10/ 12~~
cl "D"Q IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILJIIIIIIIIII
11 l 11
I' 0 11
B1oc 17 I 111
REAR
Seo I e 1/8 11 = 1 foo
10/ 12
16 I 5 .00 11 ----J
19 I 0 .00 11
r-------30 IO .00 11 ----t-----l-----1
EJIDlc24
c24RJD
4 IO .21 I
Block
-~-
3/16 11 = 1 1
LEFT (North)
1 I 6 .L'
4 I O .00 11
R 1ght e I evot 10n
/ ['\
I \
I \
\ I
\ I 26 I 10 .35"
\ I
Scale 3/16 11
-1 1
4/ 12 Roof over k 1tchen & mud room
I .. 13 ' 2 .63" • 1
2 I 0 .00'
I
1 l
I 8 IO .00'
Gorog1 ! ~1~==11--Ex 1st 1ng House
Mud roo I = e1evot1on
Seo I e 3/ 16 11 = 1 foot
1184 SQ OFT O ( inc I ud ing sto irs) Scale 3/16 11 = 1 foot
I 44 'O"--l----------~
I • 23'6-1/2"---------i
... 8'0" -
I I ~l 1 ~-A~7~l~-,-l--_J_------,---~I
II I i 6 IOI I I ~T IL ITY
T
8 'O'
I u ./I >
I
I
\
I
r-
30 '0'1'
16 '6"
stee I p,st
,+,.
~------i4 '3"---------i
r ---~I 1 9'973/4"
I,
c:::::> I ,,.--_,,-.I,,-\/I/,,-. I
t..__l '--" ,.__,. ' ~v--~
~-----14 '0" -
Stai rls 7 .5' i 10 S'
stee I oo~t
(l' ,n
3 1011 t
* I-
"P
BASEMENT 32 '0"
'-----+ ! 7' 10-1/4"1--
'
-
23'3" -----+-------ii~ Sto;~;e
* *
•
f
L ~) \] \
~lst r ioor 44'0''-
Scale 3/15 11 =
\
\
\
17 'O"
21'4-1/2"
~v .\-c
I \, \I
\~
d.' "
30 'O"
\___.--------i8'0"
13 '8"
1st Ing I
30 (r'-
S1 01rc:, 7 5''/:0 5'1
V l , 'J I O I 0
\ / / ?c----1.( / / / ~ / /
\ iif--===i1 : r1f=--11i--___,, ~/J=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=l~=I~------~---------~ \, , l k'
\ i -/II "'' ' 27 5'' 1 I , G iloss ·a I oci<
20 3"
• y-or •
CLOSET
9 '6'
\ I '
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
' I i '-\ I ///
\ ;5 '3" /
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
GR ROOM\ //
I'
\ I
\ I
\ I
\I/
\·I y
1J \ I
I \,:====='~
-I 13 /9" I '': -
/ I \
/ I \2 8" I,/ . .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
17 '5" i
I
I
I
I
I
I
,,
\
'.,,.__ 0 O '.,c" "' 1
..._~~---'l k-' ·----111~
'C::::: :,~ "' • I
LJ its• \.-. ---'-------'
I
CTI/
ri
I
13 '6"
10~~.1 I I L__Jj
W=:-T PAR' _I '-' '
\
\
\
BEDROOM I
I
I
I
I
! I I\I I
, I I I B rn· ooM \1 J .-----_____, ,
l _______________ ~t:z~ _________ // 1 , \ _________ ~t;?~ _______________ J
I I I
I I I
I I I
2nd FLOOR
1288 so 0
I I I
I I I
I I I
I '----------r~--I .--------~ I l _____________________ 1
~
1tv~s:t ___________________ J Seo I e 3/ 10 1
35 6'
I 1
1T.· ~--·-~~ .-I I t) .. • ·• I . .·w ,~
' ,, -. ~~ 6
0 Driveway
0
14 'O"
0
0
15 '7-1/2"
----------------------------------
-----------------
County Rood 84
HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS
320 Washington Avenue South
Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 ·
Permit No. _3.;::_::.8_7_3 _____ _
DRIVEWAY OR STREET ENTRANCE PERMIT AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS
DAVE ZETTERSTROM 4/10/95 Field inspected by------------------------------Date ________ _
Location __ _.li,_,18-<:;4:,:.._-=4,..,Q.._.8 ..... Q.,__ _________ Speed zone -----'3=5"--------A.D.T. 520
Nearest Cross Street (if rural)~: -----=T~O~Nt::KA=W~A~--------------'-------------------
440 + Sight distance: Actual -Left ______________________ _ Right 350 +
Minimum -Left __________ 4.__4,...,0'------------Right 0
Curb to be removed to: D Construction Joint D Sawed Joint
24' Recommended drainage: D Surface Cll. Culvert Culvert length _________ _ Culvert diameter 15 II
applicant to call for delivery
1. CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS (Within Right-of-Way)
BASE SURFACE CURB SIDEWALK SHOULD!;R BLVD-DITQH
Type _____ _ Type CR ROCK Type ____ _ Type ____ _ Type Topsoil
Depth ____ _ 4 " M" Depth 1.n. Design ____ _ Depth ____ _ Depth Depth 3"
& seed or sod
2. TRAFFIC CONTROL REQUIREMENTS PLATE /12 OR 113 AS NEEDED.
3. SPECIAL PROVISIONS ONE 14' MINIMUM, 22' MAXIMUM WIDTH PRIVATE DRIVEWAY RELOCATION
PERMITTED AS SKETCHED. APPROACH TO HAVE 5' FLARES AND PROFILE
SIMILAR TO DIAGRAM B BELOW. EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO BE OBLITERATED
AND THE DITCH RESTORED.
DO NOT PLACE CONCRETE ON COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY WITHOUT WRITTEN
PERMISSION. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, CALL 930-2548.
R/W
Diagram A
IMPORTANT: TYPE "a" CONSTRUCT ROUNDED BERM TO
PREVENT WATER FROM RUNNING DOWN
DRIVE.
Shoulder
Final inspection date _______ _
Driveway was found to be D · Satisfactory
D Unsatisfactory
Inspected by _________ _
I Diagram B
C/L IMPORTANT: CONSTRUCT SWALE TO DIVERT WATER FROM R/W
SHOULDER.
Shoulder
Place culvert in existing ditch
APPRO~VED/-: tf# ~ HENNEPIN --~R
By , . t,---
Date · -f-1 Z-!JS-
DO NOT. FlLE THIS PERMlT -REAC IT!
PERMIT ~\UST EE IN POSSESSION OF THE·
CONTRACTOR PEBFORl.~ING THE 'A'ORK.
~ -.-. ' ' ' r"' = ;-, --· '=' -• C C O '-' T -0 L e I G ·u t -N G c c A l n C. --• r, -_ 1 r-. >--. • r-1 , , I"'\ . -a -.. r.
EEO~~ JOE SliE A~~D PfiOPE~LY PLACED PRiO
TO ST~hT OF JOE.
~ D O N O T AL LO W '11 U D A N D DEE R i S TO AC CU f.~ U ·
L A T E O N R O A D \',' A Y •
.A :: X I S T I ~ G D ~ h ; ~~ ~ G E S H A L L E E 1'1 A : ~~ T A l ~J E ~ f./
ALL TIMES.
RESTO F.~ Tl ON TO 8 E CO NTINU OU S V-'lTH JCS
FROGnE:55.
CALl. PERMIT OFFiCE g3a-ZS-4-S,. +9", STJ
PRJOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION ANO FOR
OWNER: Mark Harrington
. CITY OF ORONO
SEPTIC SYSTEM APPROVAL
CITY of ORONO
Munk:ipal Offices
Post Oflke Box 66 .
Crystal Bay, l\finnesota 55323-0066
-----------------------------------
GENERAL CONTRACTOR: SEPTIC CONTRACTOR: -------------------
SITE EVALUATOR: S-P Testing REPORT DATE: November 19, 1994 -------------
The City of Orono has ___ A_p_p_r_o_v_e_d ____ your on-site system design as of February 21, 19 9 5
(approved-disapproved) (date)
Expansion area for the existing system meets all with the following comments: ____________________________ _
State and Local Codes. The future meets most State and Local Codes,
but a variance has been granted for a system on 7% to 9% slopes(6% or
less required). The residence. may be enlarged to a maximum five bedrooms
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a design approval form which must accompany the site plan. A pennit must
be issued to a licensed septic contractor prior to installation. A list of currently licensed septic contractors is ·
enclosed.
NOTICE TO INSTALLERS: Any changes to the approved plans and specs must have prior approval of the
Inspector (473-7357). Call for inspections 24 hours in advance.
ALL DRAINFIELD AREAS MUST BE FENCED OFF prior to building site excavation and fencing must remain
in place until final site grading. Approval to pour footings will not be granted until the Inspections Department
has verified that primary and alternate sites are adequately protected.
NO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC OF ANY KIND (cars, trucks, earth moving equipment, etc.) is allowed within 20'
of tested drainfield sites either before or after system construction. Compaction of these areas could render them
unusable prohibiting the timely completion and or limiting the long term use of the property.
A site copy will be available at the City Offices for the septic contractor.
TELEPHONE -473-7357 • FAX -473-4510
S-P TESTING, INC. Steven 8. Schirmers -MPCA Cert. No. 627
951 Katydid Lane NE • St. Michael, MN 55376 • (612) 497-3566
November 19, 1994
Mark Harrington
4080 Bayside Rd.
Orono, Henn. Co., MN
This site has an existing Pressurized Mound System for a 3BR home.
The system will be increased for a SBR home.
The mound will be added to at each end of the rock bed. The
existing mound will need the topsoil removed to the washed sand
with a backhoe with no travel on the mound. The tank capacity
will require an additional 1000 gallon holding tank. The pumping
chamber is a 1000 gallon capacity which meets City code for minimum
capacity. Recommend to reshape and divert the run off away from
the pumping chamber.
The future expansion is on 7% to 9% slope & will need approval
by the City Official.
The soils at a depth of 12" have a percolation rate averaging
2.9 min/inch.
All neighboring wells are located greater than 100' away from the
proposed treatment area.
Keep all heavy equipment off of the proposed treatment area before
and after construction. The treatment area should be marked off
before construction. This Design is not valid & the system will
need to be relocated if failure to protect the areas proposed
for On-Site Sewage Treatment occurs.
With proper installation and maintenance, this system should have
no problem in treating septic effluent effectively.
Nothing other than gray water (laundry, showers, etc.) human waste
& toilet tissue should be disposed into the septic tanks. Garbage
disposals are not recommended. Excessive amounts of soaps, cleaning
agents & chlorine agents may kill the bacteria needed to treat
septic effluent. Additives are not recommended. Recommend to pump
& clean your tank through the manhole by a certified pumper every
year if you have 1 tank and every 2 years if you have two tanks.
C: 7/--g, ~
~~B. Schirmers
SBS/ds
0
'
' , .... I ..... , ...,
s~
I
I
91-'l ✓
I
~ \l-~ A\..,).._ \-\~;~v½' ~Q__,\"'"M,e;~-f o~~ o« --f\-\1;;::c
~o~ ~,-.,,.~'."!" 'A'~':>~~-€... -v-14~~
C...o 1-l !:,-('"'1-i.l l..--f1 OH .
6, Perco!a!ion Tests
.XSoil Borings
® Bench Mork
.,
'-.J V
~),e -100. oo
// I
Scale: t .:::-1...)D
-Nole: This system is to be co-istructed to meet
the Minnesota Pollu!ion Con!rol A;f!ncy
Chapter 7080 & Local Ordinance
Check all underground utilities
PROPERTY OF: b:1 Prx:~ µA"y)}?'\SJb }:l -_
~ '-60 "\7:,A-\-{S\"'1:>:e--:::'?:::S?. __ _
e?:oµo Ml:-?. lJ~µ. CH:J.
S-P TEST/Ny/NC.
Designed By:;?'.~ (>; • '7c ~
Oo:e:12/f:i~ PH 5t? -497-:'i')F.F.
HOUSE
-,.. --....:3 0 I
/~---
/ "" ,____ ·1-. " I I ~--,......,..., --,-, ----,-
I ' '-, I le,,( J d O ~ '-I ' I ,____ .;x.1!>-<1,.,1, '\Z-o<->?-~~-
"--,\
'"'1
I~
I~
l~ ""/
.... ~ :.Sl2:T/-BACKS·
....
\"\
\"'\ \.\
I •
7-J'.?;~-
System must be'"·--------------
Tonk ~{) ' from property lines
"'l::>' from wells
;;i_t) from bldgs.
Treatment area =-' frcm lakes , -' streams
Treatment area -2&.1
from property lines
M.4->-ll.foLt:S .,..·,ri i,,_" '? ~ 'from wells
134 c.i::.FJL1.... 3..Q.: from bldgs.
& from trees
::29min.
Drop to Tonk
Min. 111
!0 8 1
Tonk
Mox.i"to4' 4 'f-~? :::('l\)..l~S
4°
0
lo 6
11
dio. pipe
Tonk
~"die.SU
30 1
\__Pumping
Chamber
NOTE: Power supply and switches must be located in a
weather proof enclosure outside the pumping chamber and manhole
SOIL BORING ELEVATlONS
TH _:i I EL. -:'.Ll.:.Y.. ----grade l % TH."'2. EL. -c;rs. y
TH ·3 EL -'10,D
--f)-} •c,,, -95.5'
$"\S .... J -9'3,':i .
S:» ~ '6 -°1'1.~
PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION MOUND SYSTEM TH:"'4 EL.-°lb.O
TH~ 5 EL.-.:liU
ELEVATION at PROPOSED PUMPING
CHAM8ER-C6'iS .u
6"1'-0\....'-,..\,:;:, ~'") ~l'S<'S'>Y G . SYSTEM DESIGN -MOUND y\..1~•'1--'\.. ~ .. ~~ -qi.\."?..
TYPE-1.., _5_ BEDROOM, Average percolation rote JL.2:,min./inch (design.83sq.ft treatment preo ~roal. of doily sewage flow)
i;:X\~)},I\,. 10 X. 41 1 ·'?".x\~-{)1,J'\'.:,. ~ gol./doy x .83sq.ft./gol.~ sq.ft. of treatment area + leo/o =_:ll,Q_ sq.ft. ( ~ 10ft. width=dL ft.length of bed area +side slope run ...'.:L.to I x~ height= 2J_ ft.x~ ft. lawn-area needed)
Clean rock needed -.2.l.J.2._sq.ft. treatment area x /.os' depth of rock~cu_tt..;.. 27=_S{_cu.yds. ( 3/4
11
to 21/~' die. , includes 2" of rock above pipe) .
1
.
Clean .sand fill below rock needed _2Q_cu_yds. approx. , sandy loam bock fill __s(__cu.yds. approx., topsoil 6 -1.1,:;u.yd .. BV<c::-, '5fD4:s:> :s:>"'=-::9::C'r-l · ), L.f ...; 7 ,,
. ...,_..,..,,4c.11.._ . . t ~~u:,~~~-"v -(c ~-o ~o°7o ~c -r-e>~5o~'-~o~ \1tc~~,-l\...f>l'l-.-">.Jr.Q.j>~---<--~-?-~t:i.-:s,,.n,,\...JI
Number of tanks required _3_, 1st tank Jo DO gal. , 2nd tonk-gal. minim.ms f\_\..\ s ?>-l m ~\ t...i t.:. L-f:i ~Y'Yl '$ ~ ~ · . ~ . \:
I"""')<,:, ',/,,I ,,-, -... .-1' ~\ ~ µ'v YY1 "w),, :t:>. . i
Pumping chamber capacity-25% of dailysewage flow of~gal.=~gal.+reserve storage of· 150gal/BR=~gol.+pipebockdroinoge-PROPERTY OF: MA-rX... BP..'.k-g.)B\:i:1QJ-J :
of Ir.? gol./lOOlin.ft.ofi
11
dia.supply pipe, tin.ft.needed JO , ~gol.-+manifoldHgal./lOOlin.ftof d..
11
dia.pipe 1 ln.ft.needed~, --z_gol. HD½() ~A\..(5,)JZ::e:-:'.'f:-<v. ( (o.1:~'"l\.\J !
tat capacity needed 05% gal.(plus~Ae~forpump) u~1::-lr\1n. /000 ~"ILce..f>, O:1'.:0)JD M>:J. \-1~\~. 6V. !
-• IJ • /'ri:'O"'fl ) \. ' II • • " I ·tx.it1on pipe ~ die. , ~Jin.ft. , ....:..L:::.L d1a. perforot10ns ~ apart -~:u-"i\~~ %-,
ize ~hp. (pumpoble capacity B...{'_gal. 4cycles/day) ws~9 .;:;t'-) ' H~~-<;) ?¥,~<::.~ -, . .P.\~BR.~',,.,>-.:Z-1.-\ '.2 °~,'71.\J ro, n. l S-p TESll(V{i /p/C.
: When constructing bed :. , this area shoux::I be shaped ~~-,!;S~\-Note: Distonce from treatment area to neighboring wells-; Designed By: 7f;_, 0'5. ~' .
to divert run-off from entering treatment area. b:?:v-A:::::s:"-s;::SZ--:::SBA:,--\ >Do' \ Doie:/J/';2,:,/°11:-L, PH. 61 2-497-3566
HOUSE
I •
~--;;i0min.
SET-BACKS
System must be :
Tonk l.£.
1
from property lines
'l 5 ' from wells
~o from b!dgs.
Treatment area ..:::_ ' frcm lakes 1 -' streams
Treatment area ~• from property lines
• OJ ')/ I MA-J-ll-¼oLt.$ ""'YI i,,. _::._ from we!ls
BAl-t:'.h LL-;;l__u : from bldgs.
..LIL from trees
---:-\._--
lb t 10'
NOTE: Power supply and switches must be located in a
weather proof enclosure outside the pumping chamber and manhole
SOIL BORING ELEVAT\ONS
·~
TH.lll EL. -.:13..:i.
_2,_"dio.su ---TH .. 2EL ·""s w
_ l ~ 0 , _ grade _:i_ % ·,. · -~
··n-l~l.. -e,~.~
sv. ... '7 -"1'3.-'-1
Drop to Tonk
Min. ( to 8 1
Tonk
Mox.I" lo 4' 4 '\-:~"? :::(µ,}..). 'C. CS
4
11
10 6 11
dio. pipe
Tonk '• ,, ..
\_Pumping
Chamber
TH. 3 EL.-"to.o
..!.P..:...R:.::::E.::::.:SS~U::.:..R~Ec...:D:::.:;!S::::..T;_;_R.:.:.::IBU=..:.T=IO~N;_.;.:.;M=O=UNc..:.;D~S...;..YS.;::;...T_E __ M TH_ ... 4 EL.-~
$"\:;, .... ~-"I?-~
TH~ 5 EL.-"o/<t. I
ELEVATION at PROPOSED PUMPING
CHAMBER-~ "'?Ll'W\.?.
L.o-.:-o~ A-< "'?wv>"-,,1>-' .... 4}~~--'<'._ "'l'l:z..I
SYSTEM DESIGN -MOUND
TYPE-:S:. 1 l BEDROOM I Average percolation rate?.°? min.finch (design.83sq.ft treatment area pergol. of doily sewage flow}
"J.:{'O gal./doy x .83sq.ft/gal.~ sq.ft. of treatment area + m% -sq.ft. ( :7" 10ft. width= l:? '2 ft.length of bed area +side slope run ..::Lto I x~ height= ..:::LL-ft.x.:l.k_ ft. lawn-area needed)
Cleon rock needed-~sq.ft. treatment area x /.os-' depth of rock=L.S~ cu.ft7"27=...:3.:L.cu.yds. ( 3/411
to 21/2
1
die. 1 includes 2
11
of rock above pipe)
1
!
Cleon sand fill below rock needed :::!laO cu.yds. approx. , sandy loom bockfill~cu.yds.approx.1 topsoil 6
11
.1Lc;u.yd . ....B..\L~-s:&H_--<v S>~?:f:)--ls /.? ,I
. ~ 3~~ . . ( ~.'e(A~~~-'O -{c ~'O ';I.O°lo -(o --C-o~5o,'-~t-\11-:.~~~l..-p,~ _'=>:~~_,.,, -~H-?~'1'.1:1.:'.5o-(r.\..)i
Number of tonks required~, 1st tonkl9QQ.__gol. , 2nd tonk loo D gal. m1nun.rns r\..~s ?urn ?1 tJ 1-::, L-H~Yl')°'$"e:. ~ . ~-, 1 P.' 1
. . , St) c/,e/, '):$"";to , . ~--(1..)~ ~;><:?~ ~ION ~i'.t-. i
Pumping chamber capacity-25% of doily sewage flow of _'7 __ gal.=~gal.+ reserve storage of .:t-5ir-J?11 / BR=~ gal.+ pipe bock drainage-PROPERTY OF: MA~'f: MPCT::l'}) \.:.:::S:D")...l ;
f ~gal. /IOOlin.ft. oL.3...." dia. supply pipe, !in.ft. needed l::S O , __u_gal.-+ manifold ..l..:Lgol./lOOlin.ft oL.2..." dio. pipe I In.ft needed_'.}_ , __1=_ gal. !jo "60 "oA-:i-s ,-s;:;,~ ::?::~ , · I
I capacity needed 'JI)(,,, gal.(plusoreoforpump) U<;,e=..f'rl1n. /ooo C?J"'ILca.f', Q'?-D)...1.0 Mµ. t+1"1:1;J. i:::,o.
tion pipe \ 11 ~ "dio. , ~ lin, ft. , ~• dio. perforations ~" apart
~hp. (pumpoble copocity.2..C:Lgol. 4cycles/doy) ..J.,ls,e..::9
When constructing bed :-:-, this area shoul::l be shaped
divert run-off from entering treatment oreo.
I
~:l_' H""-f.-v f>'?~-":.s. , O_\~Bft~~~-,;;;::.=c.--__ y_,.___7_,_¥1-) m, o. __
Note: Distance from treolrnent o~o lo neighboring wells-
h~t.'\--\0'<.' ::::sYr~H ! no 1
S-P TESTING !tC.
Designed By:~ G2;>,.t;~
nntP ,i~/1<>i/"'74 . PH. 612-497-3566
MOUND DESIGN WORKSHEET
(For Flows up to 1200 gpd)
A FLOW
Estimated ')~0 gpd
or measured -X 1.5 = -gpd.
B. SEPTIC TANK UQUID VOLUMES
?c-/oo D c_~,) C.<i:y. gallons :;,_ -/00<.:J ,v1•:,--<i1 '1--1 \., (_ q'v--p I -/oOO~--i\ j
C. SOILS (refer to site evaluation) , 1
1. Depth to restricting layer = ~o -ro .~o inches
2. Depth of percolation tests = l ii II inches
3. Percolation rate ;;__ .°7 mpi
4. Land slope °' %
D. ROCK LA YER DThffiNSIONS
1.
2.
3.
Multiply flow rate by 0.83 to obtain required area of rock
layer: Ax 0.83 =
1-.S"u . gpd x 0.83 sq. ft./ gpd =~sq. ft.
Select width of rock layer (10 feet or less) = __,_/......:o'----ft.
Length of rock layer = area+ width =
Ce :i_?., sq. ft. + ) o ft. = '4, :)__ ft.
E. ROCK VOLUME
1. Multiply rock area by rock depth to get cubic feet of rock;
~sq. ft. x~ft. =~cu.ft.
2. Divide cu. ft. by 27 cu. ft./ cu. yd. to get cubic yards;
~cu.ft. + 27 =~cu. yd.
3. Multiply cubic yards by 1.4 to get weight of rock in tons;
~ cu. yd. x 1.4 ton/ cu. yd. = ~ tons.
F. ADSORPTION WIDTH L..o i-1 )Yl
1. Percolation rate in top 12 inches of soil is ~ mpi
Estimated Sewage Aow in Gallons per Day (gpd)
Number
of Type!
Bedroom,
Type II Type III Type IV
2 300 225 180 6()'l,
3 450 300 218 of
4 600 375 256 the
values 5 750 450 294 in
6 900 525 332 the
7 1050 600 370 other
colu.mru 8 1200 675 408
Number ---~-Cap,city,.·u.b
of G..,....
Bedrooms c..,-;,y ~
C,,.U.-) (pl.lao,)
2 or less 750 1.125
3 or4 1.000 1.500
5 or6 1.500 2.250
7 or 8 2.000 3,000
ove.-9 See fig. C-6 (x 1.5)
Rock Bed
Length
Absorption Width Si.zing Table
PercoLltion Rabe c..n~ Ratio ol
Soil Texture po-d.oy n>dbed
Minute, per inch po-,qu...-. w'idth to
. (mpu r .... -~~
2. Select allowable soil loading rate from table;
, (.,. o gpd/ ft2
Faster than 0.1 K:oarse Sand 1.20 1.00
3. Calculate adsorption width ratio by dividing rock layer
loading rate of 1.20 gpd/ft2 by allowable soil loading rate;
1.20 gpd/ft2+ ~gpd/ft2 = :) .oo .
4. Multiply adsorption width ratio by rock layer width to get
required adsorption width;
:J.o O X ....l!:2___ ft = ~(9, D ft
0.1 to5 Sand 1.20 1.00
0.1 to5 Fine Sand-0.60 2.00
6 to 15 Sandy Loam 0.79 1.52
..16..to..30 Loam _d[6ID 2.00
31 to 45 Silt Loam 050 2.40
46 to 60 Clat Loam 0.45 2.67
61 tO 120 lay 0.24 5.00
Slower than 120 Clay ---
•• Soil having~ or more of fine or very fine sand.
I
G. DOWNSLOPE DIKE WIDTH
1. If landslope is 3% or more, subtract rock layer width from
adsorption width to obtain minimum downslope dike toe
~ ft -_}_Q_ ft = / o feet
2. Calculate Minimum mound size based on geometery:
a. Determine depth of dean sand fill at upslope edge of rock
layer: Separation /. =s feet
b. Multiply rock layer width by landslope
to determine drop in elevation;
Slope Difference
-12_x~%-!-100=:.3._feet
c. Add depth of dean sand for separation (2a) --feet
at upslope edge, depth of rock layer (1 foot) to depth of
cover (1 foot) to find the mound height at the upslope edge
of rock layer;
~ft+ 1ft + 1ft = ~ -~ feet s 'E:.-
d. Enter table with landslope and upslope dike ratio.
Select dike multiplier of ~ , ':J ~
e. Multiply dike multiplier by upslope mound height
r fooFCovtr
Rock Bed Width
__ feet
__ feet
J.\w
to find upslope dike width:~ x ..2.f2:::L = _Lo_ feet :5"'i:=
f. Add depth of dean sand for slope difference (2b) at µ~-3 · ~ '!".--.s · :;i__ -:::, ::
downslope edge, to the mound height at the upslope edge
of rock layer (2c) to find the downslope height;
~ ft + ~ ft = ~ feet
g. Enter table with landslope and downslope dike ratio.
Select dike multiplier of Ca , 2 s . $~
h. Multiply dike multiplier by downslope mound height
to get downslope dike width: i.,.i~ x L.J,<-=~feet S~
i. C9mpare the values of step G.1 and Step G.2h Select the
greater of the two values as the downslope dike width;
~-\,..:, feet 0IG:8?7rn77TT017fJ?f:
j. Total mound width is the sum of
upslope dike (G.2e) width plus rock
layer width (D.2) plus
/--) L-0 downslope dike width(G.2i); ~ 'L.
JI -\ 10 -1 ;) 1 ~-'-l :l_ -1J2_ ft + _j_Q____ ft + ~ ft = J::!:_k_ feet
k. Total mound length is the sum of
upslope dike width (G.2e) plus rock layer
length (D.3) plus upslope dike width (G.2e);
-1.t)_ ft + ~ ft + Jj__ ft = -~ feet
:)__(.,, +-(./L -t O..I. -.:_ )0'7
uownslope
3:1 4.:1 5:1 6:1 7:1 3:1
o/o slol"'
0 3.0 (.Q 5.0 6.0 7.0 3.0
I 3.09 U7 5.26 6.38 7.53 2.91
2 3.19 4.35 5.56 6.82 8.14 2.63
3 3.30 (..5( 5.88 7.32 6.86 2.i3
4 3.41 4.76 6.25 7.89 9.72 2.68
5 3.53 5.00 6.67 857 10.77 2.61
.L-,3.66 <Si£, 7.14 9.38 12.07 2.54
7 3.80 5.56 7l}j' .. -· ioi4 1373 2.48
8 3.95 5.88 8.33 11.54 15.91 2.42
9 4.11 ~ 9.09 13.04 18.92 2.36
10 4.29 6.(;J !0.0 15.00 2333 2.31
11 4.48 7.14 11.11 17.65 30.-1.3 2.26
12 4.69 7.69 12.50 21.43 43.i5 2.21
Total Length
upslope
4:1 5:1 6:1 7:1 8:1
4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0
3.85 4.76 5.66 654 7.41
3.70 4.54 5.36 6.14 6.90
357 435 5.Cll 5.79 6.45
3.45 4.17 4.84 5.46 6.06
3.33 4.00 4.62 5.19 5.71
6-?D 3.85 4.41 4.93 5.41
3.12 3.70 4.23 4.70 5.13
~ 357 4.C6 4.49 4.88
. 3.45 3.90 4.30 4.65
2.86 3.33 3.75 4.12 4.44
2.78 3.23 3.61 3.95 4.26
2.70 3.12 3.49 3.80 4.Cll
PUMP SELECTION PROCEDURE
Determine pump capacity!
Gravity Distribution
1. Minimum suggested is 600 gallons per hour (10 gpm) to stay ahead of
water use rate.
2. Maximum suggested for delivery to a drop box of a home system is 2,700
gallons per hour (45 gpm) to prevent build-up of pressure in drop box.
Pressure Distibution
3. a. Select number of perforated laterals 3
b. Select perforation spacing= :::S feet.
c. Subtract 2 ft. from the rock layer length.
~1.~-~ -2 ft. -I ,,,Q) · feet.
d. Dete"nnine the number of spaces between perforations.
Length perf. spacing=(.£)___ ft. +~ft. = -Z..O spaces
e. :zn_ spaces+ 1 = _g_j__ perforationsnateral
f. Multiply perforations per lateral by number of laterals to ,,,) L/ · c,1 µ _
get total number of perforations.~ x ;:,h.,..-.1 = ~ perforations;
g. ~ x~=-=D...gpm.
SELECTED PUMP CAPACITY Y ') gpm
B. Determine head requirements:
1. Elevation difference between pump and point of discharge.
~0'?"0;;~~ l::, feet
G,; 1 2. If pumping to a pressure distribution system, five feet for pressure
required at manifold if gravity system, zero. ~ I S:-:: feet
3. Friction loss ----1-i ~ ~;;:;, a. Enter friction loss table with gpm and pipe diameter.
\ ---z_, . Read frictio_;}-loss in feet per 1_00 feet from table.
F.L. = ":> •:J ft./100 ft of pipe
b. Detennine total pipe length from pump to discharge
point. Add 25 percent to pipe length for fitting
loss, or use a fitting loss chart. Equivalent pipe
length-1.25 times pipe length=
I -SO x 1.25 = / VJ, feet
c. Calculate total friction loss by multiplying
friction loss in ft/100 ft by equivalent pipe length.
Total friction loss= '3, .S--x I v 2 +100 = (,.., feet
4. Total head required is the sum of elevation difference,
special head requirements, and total friction loss.
l ~ (/ / -~~-"-__ + _ _e,,,~'--+--~'--
(1) (2) (3d
TOTAL HEAD ?'-t feet
C. Pump selection
1. A pump must be selected to deliver at least
~ gpm '(Step A) with at least ~ feet of total head (Step B).
F-17
ENO PERFORATION OF A P£RFORATED LATERAL
.. -AJ Leo•• 12• ro Ed9«
"'-""'!!!,.<,!'""-"'~~....,.,..,....,_,;:,.:;:",'· · of Roell. l.Dyff
Required Perforation Discharge
in gallons per minute (gpm)
D~e
Head
(feet)
~2 ind,p.,f % ind>p.,f
1.0a 0.56 0.74
2.0b 0.80 1.04
a. Use for single family homes
b. Use for all other applications
Pipe Length
□Pump
Point of ID1~7~ge
Elevation Difference
<£~
F-18b
1.5 inch 2.0 inch 3.0 inch
gpm Friction loos pa I 00 ft of pipe
10 0.69 0.20
12 0.96 0.28
14 1.28 0.38
16 . 1.63 0.48
18 2.03 0.60
20 2.47 0.73 0.11
25 3.73 1.11 0.16
30 5.23 1.55 0.23
35 7.90 2.06 0.30
40 11.07 2.64 0.39
45 14.73 3.28 0.48 50 ... -··-··· ·3_99 0.58
55 4.76 0.70
60 5.60 0.82
L-lj
CERTlFlCl\TIOI\J ;f 00627 Lo_9~::; of ___ Soi_l_ Borit\g:::;
Location or Project Mark Harrington, 4080 Bayside Rd., Orono ----------
Borings ·made by S-P t;'.§sting, Inc. Steve Schirmers Date 11-9-94
Other Classifiction System: AASHO
Auger used (check two): Iland X
Depth, Boring number 4
in
; USDA-SCS X ; Unified ---
, or Power , Flight , or Bucket
Depth, Boring number
in
X
5
feet Surface elevation 96.0 feet Surface elevation 98.1
0 -... --0 ---·--·----
Topsoil dark brown
Topsoil dark brown loam 1 -loam 1 -
---·--
0 -1 1 8 11 -MOTTLED 1 1 8 II
2 -
0 -2-1/2'-MOTTLED 2-1
Rusty dark gray loam
3 -2-1/2' 3 I 2 11 -
Rusty dark gray clay loam
3 I 2 11 -3 I 10 II
4 -
Rusty gray clay
loam
3 I 10 11 -5' 5 -
6 -
7 -
:
8 -
(
End of boring at
Standing water table:
5 I feet.
present at ___ _ feet of depth,
hours after boring.
Not present in hole X
-------
Mottled soil:
Observed at 2~1/2~~et of depth.
Not present in hole -------
Comments:
Rusty dark gray brown loam 2 -
12 l' 8 11 -2 I 4 II
Rusty dark gray
3 -clay loam
2 I 4 II -3 I 4 II
4 -Rusty gray clay
loam
3 I 4 II -5'
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
End of boring at 5'
-------feet.
Standing water table:
present at ____ _ feet of depth,
hours after boring.
Not present in hole _____ x ___ _
Mottled soil:
Observed at 1 I 8 11 feet of depth.
Not present in hole --------
Comments:
L-lJ
CERTifICJ\TIOI~ ;1 00627 Log::; of ___ Soi_l __ Borin __ gs
Location or Project Mark Harrington, 4080 Bayside Rd.,Orono ----------
Borings made by S-P ~§sting, Inc. Steve Schirmers Date 11-9-94
Classifiction System: AASHO __ ; USDA-SCS X ; Unified ---Other
Auger used (check two): !land X , or Power , Flight , or Bucket X
Depth,
in
feet
Boring number 6 --------~
Surface elevation 95.5
0 ->-------------------
1 ---
2 ---
3 -
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 ---
8 -
Topsoil dark brown
loam
0 -2'4"-MOTTLED 2'4"
Rusty dark gray
clay loam
2'4" -4-1/2'
Rusty olive gray clay loam
4-1/2' -5'
End of boring at
Standing water table:
feet.
present at ----feet of depth,
hours after boring.
Not present in hole --~~---
Mottled soil:
2 I 4 II
Observed at ____ feet of depth.
Not present in hole ______ _
Comments:
Depth,
in
feet
-----
Boring number 7 ---------
Surface elevation 93.4
0 -,-------------------·-· -·----
1 -
2 -
3 -
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
Topsoil dark brown
loam
0 -1' 2"
Brown clay loam
1'2" -1'8"-MOTTLED 1'8~
Rusty olive brown
clay loam
1'8" -3'10"
Rusty olive brown
loam
3'10" -5'
End of boring at -------feet.
Standing water table:
present at ____ _ feet of depth,
hours after boring.
Not present in hole x ----~----
Mottled soil:
Observed at 1' 8" feet of depth.
Not present in hole --------
Comments:
I
L-lJ
.CERTIFICATION J 00627 Logs of ___ Soi_l __ Rorif\gs
Location or Project Mark Harrington, 4080 Bayside Rd. Orono
Borings made by S-P T~sting, Inc. Steve Schirmers Date 12-12-94
Classifiction System: AASHO __ ; USDA-SCS X ; Unified ---Other
Auger used (check two): lland X , or Power , Flight __ , or Bucket X
Depth, Boring number 8
in 97.3 feet Surface elevation
0 --
Topsoil dark brown
loam
1 -0 1' 4 II -
Very dark gray
clay loam
2 -
1' 4" -2-1/2'-MOTTLE[
Rusty olive gray 2-1/2'
3 -clay loam
2-1/2' -3-1/2'
Rusty olive gray
4 -silty c.Jay loam
3-1/2' -4-1/2'
Rusty olive gray loam
4-1/2' -5' 5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
I
End of boring at
Standing water table:
5' feet.
present at ___ _ feet of depth,
hours after boring.
Not present in hole __ _,,_ ___ _
Mottled soil:
Observed at2-1/2' feet of depth.
Not present in hole -------
Comments:
-----
Depth, Boring number
in
feet Surface elevation
0 ---··-·--··· ---·--
1 -
2 -
3 -
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
End of boring at -------feet.
Standing water table:
present at ____ _ feet of depth,
hours after boring.
Not present in hole ________ _
Mottled soil:
Observed at feet of depth.
Not present in hole --------
Comments:
PERCOLATION TEST DA TA SHEET
a. m.
-~S_-~P_T~e~s_t~i-n~g__,__,__,~I~n~c~·---on 11-10-9 4 starting at 2 : 4 9 ,cf:~
fd1lfl'/
~_4_0_B_0_B_a_y_s_i_· d_e_R_d_. ---, Hole number ___ 4 ___ Date hole was preparerl~_l_l_-_9_-_9_4_
Depth of hole botton~ __ 1_2 __ inches, Diameter of hole ___ 6 __ inches
Soil data from test hole:
Depth, inches
0 -12 11
Soil texture
Topsoil dark brown loam
Knife Method of scratching sidewal~-----------------------------------
2
Depth of gravel in bottom of hole _____ inches
Date and hour of initial water fillin l l -9 -9 4 , dip?hO J?Tnitial water fillinF-,-__ 1_2 __ inches above hole bottom
Automatic siphon Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours ________________ _
6
--------------------, Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tes~ _____ inches
Time Percolation
·;'ime interval, Measurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks
minutes inches level, inches minutes per
inch
2:35 prefill 6
2:49 3:04 II 5-1/2 2.7 15 min
3:10 3:25 II 5-1/4 2.9 II II
3:26 3:41 " 5-1/8 2.9 II II
Percolation rate = __ 2_·_8_~,.inutes per inch.
PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET
S-P Testing, Inc. 11-10-94 2: 50 a.m. _______________ o .__ ______ starting ::it -~
(dauJ
4 0 8 0 B ' d Rd 5 11 ·• 9 -9 4 Test hole location ______ a~y_. S_l __ e ___ • ____ , Hole number _____ , Date hole was prepare<i~-----
12 6
Depth of hole botto ~----inches. Diameter of hole. _____ inches
Soil data from test hole:
Depth, inches Soil texture
0 -12 11 Topsoil dark brown loam
Method of scratching sidewal.___K_n_i_f_e ______________________________ _
2 Depth of gravel in bottom of hole ____ ~· nches
11-9-94 3:00pm 12
Date and hour of initial water fillinF-,------, Depth of initial water fillinF-,-_____ inches above hole bottom
Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic siphon
6
-------------------, Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tes.__ _____ inches
Time Percolation
·;'ime interval, Measurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks
minutes inches level, inches minutes per
inch
2:35 prefill 6
2:50 3:05 II 3-13/16 3.9 15 min
3:06 3,: 21 II 3-5/8 4.1 II II
3:22 3:37 II 3-1/2 4.3 II II
Percolation rate = __ 4_. _l_,__,Jminutes per inch.
r
PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET
Percolation test readings made by ___ S_-_P __ T_e_s_t_i_n~g~, _I_n_c_. __ 0 11-10-9 4
4080 Bayside Rd.
Test hole locatio ~--------------, Hole number _____ , Date hole was prepare'-"-------
6
fJ,Ut'I
2: 51 a.m. ta11inga.___ ______ p.m.
11-9-94
Depth of hole botto ~-1 _2 ___ inches, Diameter of hole __ 6 ___ inches
Soil data from test hole:
Depth, inches Soil texture
0 -12 11 Topsoil dark brown loam
Knife Method of scratching sidewall ___________________________________ _
Depth of gravel in bottom of hol~ __ 2 ___ inches
11-9-94 3:00pm 12
Date and hour of initial water fillin,_,__ _____ , Depth of initial water filling, _____ inches above hole bottom
Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours_~A~u~t_o~m_a~t_i_c __ s_i~p_h_o_n ____ _
6 -------------------, Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tes~ _____ inches
Time Percolation
-~'ime interval, Measurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks
minutes inches level, inches minutes per
inch ..
2:35 orefill 6
2:51 3:01 II 5-1/2 1.8 10 min
3:02 3:12 II 5-1/2 1.8 II II
3:13 3:23 II 5-3/8 1. 9 II II
Percolation rate = _ _._l_,_._,,8,___minutes per inch.
S-P TESTING, INC.
Rick Stueland
4080 Bayside Rd. (Co.Rd.84)
Orono, Henn. Co., MN.
951 KATYDID LANE
ST. MICHAEL, MN 55376
497-3566
STEVE SHIRMERS
October 31, 1986
This system is designed for a Type 1, three bedroom home and in accordance
with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency standards WPC 40 and local
ordinances.
The soils on this site are typical of SCS soils mapped -KkC -Kilkenny
loam & Erin soils. A seasonally high water table was located at 18" & 24",
(mottling). Due to the seasonally high water table, a pressurized mound
system will need to be installed. The bottom of the rock bed must be lo-
cated at least 3' above the seasonally high water table.
This site has a holding tank or tanks, which overflows to the surface. This
tank or tanks must be abandoned, pump & fill with soil. Two new tanks will
need to be installed.
The soils at a depth of 18" have a percolation rate averaging 8.2 min/inch
and are adequate for treating septic effluent.
A pumping chamber will need to be installed to lift the effluent to the
mound system.
The manifold and supply line pipe must
chamber. The distribution pipes shall
rock and sand fill material are clean.
mounded area must be turned over, just
over work.
have back drainage to the pumping
have their ends capped. Be sure the
The sod layer below the ent~re
break up the sod, be sure not to
The power supply and switches must be located outside the manhole and pump-
ing chamber in a weather proof enclosure. A warning device must be in-
stalled with a light and sound device, this is in case of a pump failure.
(Mercury floats are a good method).
All neighboring wells are located more than 100 ' away from the proposed
treatment area and 50' away from the tanks.
Keep all heavy equipment off of the proposed treatment area before and
after construction as much as possible. The treatment area should be
marked off before construction.
With proper installation and maintenance, this system should have no prob-
lem in treating septic effluent effectively.
It is recommended that the
every 2 years.
SBS/ds
Soil and Percolation Tests
Septic System Design
septic tanks be pumped
s;--t;::_ 15. ~ ~
Steven B. Schirmers
L-13
CE~TIFICATION # 00627 Logs of Soil Borings
Loca~ion or Project_~R=i-c-k~-5~t~u~e~l-a~n=d~------------------------
Borin9s made by S-P Testing, Inc. Steve Schirmers Date 10-29-86
Classifiction System: AASHO __ ; USDA-SCS X ; Unified ; Other ----------
Auger used (check two): Hand X , or Power , Flight __ , or Bucket __ x __ _
Depth,
in
feet
0 -
1 -
2 -
3 -
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
Boring number 1 ---------1
Surface elevation 92.4
Topsoil very dark
brown O _ lO" loam
Dark gray loam
1-1/2'-mottling
10" -1'10"
Olive brown clay loam
1'10" -3'8"
Olive brown loam
3I8 11 -6 I
End of boring at 6 feet.
Standing water table:
present at ----feet of depth,
hours after boring.
Not present in hole X -------
Mottled soil:
Observed at L-l/2
----feet of depth.
Not present in hole -------
Comments:
Depth,
in
feet
0 -
1 -
2 -
3 -
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
Boring number 2 ----=-----
Surface elevation 93.4
Topsoil very dark
brown loam
0 -1'8"
2'-mottling Dark gray brown
1'8" -2'4" loam
Olive brown strong clay loar
2 ,4 " _ 3 ,2 .,very moist
Gray brown silty clay loam
3'2" -· 3'10"
Gray silty loam
3 I 10 II -6 I
End of boring at 6 feet.
Standing water table:
present at -----feet of depth,
hours after boring.
Not present in hole --------X
Mottled soil:
Observed at 2 ----feet of depth.
Not present in hole --------
Comments:
L-13
CERTIFICATION# 00627 Logs of Soil Borings
Location or Project Rick Stueland -------~-----------------------~--
' ' Borings made by S-P Testing, Inc. Stev~ Schirmers Date 10-29-86
Classifiction System: AASHO __ ; USDA-SCS_X_; Unified ___ ; Other _____ _
Auger used (check two): Hand X , or Power , Flight __ , or Bucket -----X
Depth, Boring number 3
in
feet Surface elevation 90.0
0 -
Topsoil very dark
brown loam
1 -
0 -1-1/2'
Very dark gray loam
2 -2'-mottling
1-1/2' -2 I 4 II
3 -
Very dark gray clay
loam w/traces of sand
4 -at 3 6 "
5 -
2 I 4 II -6' 6 -
7 -
8 .-
I
End of boring at 6 feet.
Standing water table:
present at ----feet of depth,
hours after boring.
Not present in hole X -------
Mottled soil:
Observed at ,2 feet of depth.
Not present in hole -------
Comments:
,
Depth, Boring number
in
feet Surface elevation
0 -
1 -
2 -
3 -
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
.
End of boring at -------feet.
Standing water table:
present at -----feet of depth,
hours after boring.
Not present in hole --------
Mottled soil:
Observed at ____ feet of depth.
Not present in hole --------
Comments:
PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET
Steven B. Schirmers 10-30-86 9:26 ~ Percolation test readings made by _______________ o ._ _____ _,tarting a._ ______ p.m. ,
/dui<)
Rick Stueland 1 10 29 86 Test hole locatio,,__ ______________ , Hole number _____ , Date hole was prepared --
Depth of hole bottorn~ __ l_8 __ inches, Diameter of hole ___ 6 __ __.· nches
Soil data from test hole:
Depth, inches Soil texture
0 -10" Topsoil very dark brown loam
10" -18" Dark gray loam
Knife Method of scratching sidewal,_ __________________________________ _
2
Depth of gravel in bottom of hole _____ inches
10-29-86 S:OOp.m. 12
Date and hour of initial water fillinh-------, Depth of initial water fillinF,-_____ inches above hole bottom
Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic 5 iphon
--------------------, Maximum water depth above hole bottom during test.___---=6 __ ~inches
Time Percolation
Time interval, Measurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks
minutes inches level, inches minutes per
inch
9:15 prefill 6
9:26 9:56 " 3-3/4 8.0 30 min
10:00 10:30 " 3-5/8 8. 3 " "
10:33 11:03 " 3-1/2 8. 6 " "
Percolation rate = __ 8_·_3 __ ,.,inutes per inch.
PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET
Percolation test readings made by Steven B • Schirmers on 10-3 0 -8 6 starting ar~ __ 9_: _2_7 __ ~
tJard
Test hole location _ __._R"""j'"'c'"'"'°"k__._S"-'t ..... 1,..1~e ..... l ..... a..._n._,__,_.d _____ , Hole number_.....<..---, Date hole was prepar<>d 1 Q-2 9-8 6
Depth of hole botton,__ __ l_S __ inches, Diameter of hol...._ __ 6 ___ inches
Soil data from test hole:
Depth, inches Soil texture
0 -18" Topsoil very dark brown loam
Knife Method of scratching sidewal,._ __________________________________ _
Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 ·nches
10-29-86 S:OOp.m. 12
Date and hour of initial water fillins-------, Depth of initial water fillini=,-_____ inches above hole bottom
Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic 8 iphon
-------------------, Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tes~ __ 6 __ inches
Time Percolation
Time interval, Measurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks
minutes inches level, inches minutes per
inch
9:15 prefill 6
9:27 9:57 " 4-1/2 6.7 30 min
10:01 10:31 " " " " "
10:34 11:04 " " " " "
Percolation rate = __ 6_._7 __ _,minutes per inch.
PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET
Percolation test readings made by---"S'-t"'"e=--'-v--°'e""n-"--=B--=.__,S=c""'h'-"i"'"'r=-=m=e"-'r"'"'s"'--__ ,on 1 0 -3 0 -8 6
(dau)
~ starting at.__ _ _,._9_,_:-=2-=8 __ p.m. :
Rick Stueland 3 10-29-86 Test hole locatio,.__ ______________ , Hole number _____ , Date hole was prepareu.d ____ _
Depth of hole botton,__ __ 1_8 _ _..·nches, Diameter of h~le, __ 6 ___ _.·nches
Soil data from test hole:
Depth, inches Soil texture
0 -18" Topsoil very dark brown loam
Knife Method of scratching sidewal~-----------------------------------
2
Depth of gravel in bottom of hol~----~·nches
10-29-86 S:OOp.m. 12
Date and hour of initial water fillin&------, Depth of initial water fillin&-____ _.·nches above hole bottom
Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic siphon
-------------------, Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tes~-~6 __ inches
Time Percolation
Time interval, Measurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks
minutes inches level, inches minutes per
inch
9:15 prefill 6
9:28 9:58 II 3-1/4 9. 2 30 min
10:02 10:32 " 3-1/8 9. 6 " "
10:35 11:05 " 3-1/16 9. 8 " It
.
Percolation rate = ___ 9 _._5 _ _.Jlinutes per inch.
SANDY LOAM
LAYER OF GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC OR 4 INCHES OF
H-AY COVERED BY
.SUILDIN3 PAP£R -----.
................ / ,.
..:,/
11/. OR 2•
PIPE }ROM PUMP 7 · >•·:,.~
"':1/·
6"
····~··-
.,,
LAYOUT OF PERFORATED PIPE LATERALS FOR
PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION IN MOUND
PLASTIC PIPE PERFORATED
0 SPACED 36~•~--~ \_ PEaFORAnON/ERFDRA)'ON -z " S . ND
ON EC~E._f,.','"ae ,,,.; ''»• ¾_ I§>. 2"MA"''°'-D ~ -<"'
E S'2 • ~ me -..-· '!.!,'.W oe ''• · _ _... "--~ ~~ -,. ~ ~ ON BOTTOM OF~ . :-,,, T< '-CCA',ON, ~
l PERFORATIONS PIPE --=-1.\,.: ¾_~.,.~-c:-.=,--=:-=,, (ALTERI.A FROM PUMP PLASTIC ~ > OF PIPE ~ ----~ ,,., ---. .
"~ _,,,. ' ;;,---~ ,, "" L "" ~ ,r£8 ,..,,, '~'!:: .. , <o, ~ £O L """""' c
ENO CAP ~ ~~ roRftf
-,:::.,,./ pER P-of =-G1H '\ , f'.N
LAYER OF GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC
LOAMY SAND CAP
PERFORATED LATERAL
---
·j". ,,..,_.,,,. !¼ SLOF * SUBSOIL
CROSS SECTION A -A
A
w
'1:
P!PE FAOM
PUMPING CHAMBER
-I : : : I, L,-~ -,i~l
-PERFORATED~' ; : 11 LATERALS ' ; ; , , : I
BED
, , , I
I ' : : • : It
AREA~
I t : .JJ
: i :. I ' :/: '···· .;,,r. .. , I ' '
::c
f--
t.:> z w
..J ·-
' ' ' : : ! I o
I : tJ ; ~ : I ~ I
: 5 ! 5: 1 1 --j,z,z: --
20 I:;:;~ 1~9
INCHES I :<r:<t: I INCHES
I : l : I
L; ! : I
01KE __ --1..-Jo FEET..l-o,KE
MAX.
F-------TOTAL WIDTH _____ __.,-4
ENO PERFORATION OF A PERFORATED LATERAL
.: Top&oU c· . .:~ ... ·. ► 'i. •. '?"'Z-C" ..
Ctaan Sand later
.:,.j ···•· \"¥' w--,,,.:. Ortolno·1 Soll Prop•rty Sc.Oflfied
r-~ , .
WATER 1 IGI IT O LOCKABLE ELECTRIC BOX-"""
PLUGS OR ELECTRIC CONNECTIONS -· ------
2" PVC CONDUIT SCHEDULE 80 J -
MANHOLE COVER CHAINED a LOCKED G"S~
SEALED MANHOLE RINGS -· l
REDWOOD, CEDAR OR
TREATED POST (4 x 4 min) ___,.--~~)oiLt~11c CONNECTIONS MADE
LOOP OF POWER CORD FOR
SETTLEMENT -
. FINAL GRADE
SEALED TANK COVER-
PLASTIC ROPE OR CHAIN
WITH ANCHOR----....'---
ALARM FLOAT ON SEPARATE
ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT-·
s:r~RJ_lJ._Ya.. i:;; __ --~l---::·"
3"-\
SHUT -OFF LEVEL\l __ _
PUMP CONTROL FLO/\T · j
\I.
7
CONCRETE -
MANHOLE
RING
AT LEAST 12•
BELOW GRADE
_. rsft-t--_,__ WIRE rnoM POWER SUPPLY
PIPE IS LAID ON A UNIFORM SLOPE FROM
PUMP STATION UP TO SOIL TRE.ATMENT N1EA
FOR PROPER DRAINBACK
. L IF PIPE AT TANK MUST BE LOWER THAN
UNION. TO GET ELEVATION FOR DRAINBACK.
A 1 1◄ INCH WEEP HOLE MUST BE USED
-WEEP HOLE
NOTES: ELECTRICAL WIRE FROM POWER SUPPLY
MUST NOT RUN OVER ANY TANKS BU1
MUST BE LAID BESIDE OTI IER TANKS
AND MUST BE PLACED IN CONDUIT
ALONG POST
ELECTRICAL CORDS FROM PUMP AND
FLOATS MUST BE RlJN THfWUGH
CONDUIT WIRES CANNOT HAVE GROUND
Cot~1ACT
Figure F-8
METHODS OF SECURING MANHOLE COVER TO PREVENT
UNAUTHORIZED .ENTRY
Figure C-14
VERTICAL SIDEWALL SEPTIC TANK
AT LEAST AT LEAST
4" DIA.--....,,. I" 4" DIA.
MIN I f----+-·-AT_, __ L_E_A_S_T~-1-" -'------' ·, .. ~.
S:--D-, j l rnMENs1ONs FOR lANKS wm, vrn11cAL SIDES
LEAST I"
1
A
1--+--___,,,_ ___ wioi'~ 24• MiNi~--------_, ___ _
JE_t-!_GJ!j,_1_ 2 TO 3 _ _!l~ES THE _WIDT'-H'----
B
_J_
tAT
IIOlfS:
LEAST
3"
DIAME1ER GO" MINIM:.c..U::..;Mc.;_._ g~f~H._Q__ ~o~_~J~iMUM; 1a_'_-:-MAXIMUM C
A 0.2 D
___ 8 ___ .. ~•: MINIMUM;_ 0,2 0 MAXIMUM __ _
C O 4 0 .l~
-AT LEI\ST 4 FEET ·------··-------~
I sr.ullr.JIY 1(($ Al L.fASI < ltlCll(S IN(llAJ..<flrn ◄ ~W<IIOl l COVE.11$ Sl lAl.l llf. lOC/llEOWlllllN l"HCIIES.
1r 11 IE I.WII UE IS WI 11 11H SI• INCi tE 5 Of 11 I( SUIV AC:E
lltE COV(ll l,lJSf OE Stct.Jf1:010 rnEV[flt ACC(S.'I.
6"
7. IH(llf. SIII\J I. U( OH( on•A~lf' 1.ANO:)L(S. 20·tr"st
(llMf.USK>N N-,_J l0CA1fll Wiil llU 6 f lE I if N..l TNJK
WAllR
J. m Wl,;l'fCIIOtlrif'f or"' l.[ASI < INCll(SOIAAll:1£11
on M,11\NIIOI.E 5ll,\IJ Rfl0CA1EOOV(l1001H lltE IM.Er
/IJ/OaJllf I OCVIC't:S. 1HE CUJIE.l1l1N( ~III' W'l'l:C1Ul
r1r(S SI 11\ll 0( 1"( SM.«' AS 1 Ill cc NI rn IINE OI" lHE
6 !;(l'AflAllON IJISIIINCE l)(l'M:EH HIOor H..EI rll'f. ANI)
NEMlESI f'O~lf oH ONTL( 611Al.llle HOl(SS llWH INCIIES
OIHIO l,Ullt If~ 12 flCIIES.
UN Fll QJ'(IHNGS 011 S~IINIY HlS A 11Ulll) INSl'lCI ION
PY'( MllST Rf. lOCAI lU {.: IWf fN ll If. lll.E f '1.Nl..l OUH ft
ON fl(S.
6 ronllOfUl(.IIH/11. CYLllOlltC.-J. 1ANK$ OIW:Hf.lON /\ IS 0.1!,Cl
,_NO 01'-'f:HSION C 15 0 JSO.
. ...•..
--
-
CLEAN OUT TANK WHEN:
.. t\"•
~
MEASURE
IN
SCUM
THE
. :.,~$::· •. ~ 14-·•,1
AND SLUDGE
SEPTIC TANK
"A• IS 3" OR LESS OR
•e• IS 12• OR LESS
).:,-
BLACK COLOR
DISTINGUISHES SLUDGE
LAY~ FROM LIQUID
ACCUMULATIONS
14111t
OE,;K;NErl UY
DRAWN RY
95059
~
<ii ..
-~ ~ <::,
~
/
/
...
t:
I
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR
MARK HARRINGTON
OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, POPOV ADDITION
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
4/1.79
--;-:-:-:::-~45------12'J.76--7··1':
A
-~
E •1$fin'j houstJ . _. J11't-· -· -
~ -·
~
Q,O'
Ew,H,,.., &:ttr•,c
C'1-1Sh11t'
t)t,vl ii•'~)"
~
I
I
I
~
~
I 1{ I ~
l'o ..: ~ .. t_ ... I\•
I \I,~
I~_\\
.l.~1 \.
I"'' \ -
I ~/ I ,oi , ~
:,; ~ '"' '•0• , .. ~,/() l (\!I',,
('\ \ :?0
\ . \'
\~ \ ~~
\~,t:\ \ "~~ \'i-\.i,o
:N
\ ''f \'
\,O \, \
\::~ \'
\ ·, \
\~\ ~\..~
\,~\10\ \~~
\~ \ \
\\\ I \ ,-...
\.\I \~~>
\ I ', --~
\i\ \ ----------..... ~.9
"'\ I " \,.. , and ,-"--..
• ·'"\ 1:>r'!f~ easemud, · · · · ·-4 ""';""t--.,..~-,1 \, ~;,' I
\ ~ ' ',~~~',
.::_ "'· ' '' '
!R ' )( "6 .,,:i, "f ,,,\ ,' -·.:---., r '"'-~' ' ~-1:.-"-' "~-~-I~ , ':1il · ------llµdl
c9g
L[GAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES:
Lot 1. Block 1, POPOV ADDITION.
This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above
described property, the location of an existing house
theron, a"d the proposed location of a proposed ad~i-
tion. It does not purport to show any other improvements
or encroachments.
o Iron marker
Bearings shown are bdsed upon ar, dssumed datum.
::;;.,01w
IIJ0 . .39 ·2.,,00.J.:
lg
REVISION I DA TE (W_<;(.'Kll'rlON
<$ COFFIN & GRONBERG INC.
·, ''-,:/'j;',':-'. ·/~_' ,; :.' ' ·,, ;i;,,_ <· I
' . . ' \ . \ 1 -. -
1'1_ I ,i '. ·.! ,l, ~ \ ', ':. 1•., . .. : ' _':, ! ; \' 'I\ l), ,, \
, I i · ii i 1
I hl•rd,r ll'rht\' lhclt th1-. 1.o11rn•~· w., .. rn.•p.ut•d l;,r nw l)f undt•r my din"tl ~upt'T·
'""""· ,,nd th,11 I Jill d dul1· n·gislt'rt~l Cll'II ~ngin,•,•r Jnd Land Survevor under
tht1 I,\\\ ... tit tlw ~t.ltt· ol Minnt1~t1l,l
~/..~-~--
\1drl ', (,ronl,t•r~ ~1m1w~:;:.;"'t. N~~r 12711~
SCALF
1":50'
11Afl'
3-IJ-9!J
JOH NO
'5059
l
Zoning File #2015
5-31-95
To whom it may concern:
I--
I'm writing this letter to satisfy condition #7 as per your notice dated 5-23-95. The existing
detached double garage will be moved off site after construction has been completed on my new
garage . The garage will be needed during construction to park cars and store building materials.
&2
My best estimate of the time the garage will be removed is January 1 199,5. With your
permission, I intend to keep the slab of the existing garage in place to use for recreation. My
daughter will use the slab to play ball and ride her bicycle. Eventually the slab will be removed
when the second phase of construction begins. The second phase will involve removing our old
house (less the addition) and building a new house attached to the addition.
Sincerely,
CITY OF ORONO
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
473-7357
ZONING FILE #2015
NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION
ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: May 23, 1995
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Mark Harrington
4080 Bayside Road
Orono, MN 55359
COPIES:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Conditional Use Permit/Variances
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE OF MEETING: 05/15/95 VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the application as proposed, subject to the
four conditions set forth in the staff memo of May 4, 1995 and the additional three conditions
set forth at the meeting as follows:
5. Applicant to obtain a demolition permit for the removal of the accessory
structure.
6. Applicant to provide a copy of the Hennepin County driveway permit issued by
County for new curb cut.
7. Applicant to provide a date at which time either the County or applicant proposes
the closing off of the existing drive.
Staff asks that you provide a written statement confirming timing for removal of detached
structure and the closing off of the existing drive in order to meet the direction of the Planning
Commission recommendation to Council. This information should be submitted no later than
Monday, June 5, 1995.
Your conditional use permit/variance application will be presented for Council's review and
formal action at their June 12, 1995 meeting. Please note that meeting starts at 7:00 p.m.
lsv
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CO1\11v1ISSION
:MEETING HELD ON MAY 15, 1995
(#7 -#2013 Freshwater Foundation -Continued)
There were no public comments.
Lindquist inquired of the ADA requirements for the building. Burton said an inspection
has occurred. Only small differences were found and few modifications needed. The plan
is to comply but no time schedule has been decided. There are two levels to the building .
The elevator is not ADA approved at this time but would only be necessary if the public
were to be exposed to the lower floor in the future . Smith asked that a time frame be part
of the recommendation.
Mabusth said the institute acts as a polling place and could work out the details with the
City on compliance . Appropriate Braille signage on bathroom doors were needed as soon
as possible. Hurt asked when next election use would occur. Mabusth advised in fall of
1996 .
Berg asked about parking and any plans for paving or expansion of the parking lot. The
Applicant says there are no plans to expand, and the occasional wet conditions of the lot
are the only complaints received. Hurr replied that any additional parking would require a
CUP.
Nolan asked if any conferences were held that would incur problems with parking. It was
found that there were no guidelines in place for this situation, and Mabusth said no
problems have been reported.
Lindquist moved, Berg seconded, to approve Application #2013 for a CUP for continued
use as a research facility as the Freshwater Institute. The Applicant will bring the building
up to ADA codes within a year of their receiving the property, July, 1996. Proper
certification will be needed from the :MPCA. Ayes 5, Nays 0 .
(#8) #2015 MARK HARRJNGTON, 4080 BAYSIDE ROAD -CONDIDONAL USE
PERMITN ARIAN CE -PUBLIC HEARING 9:43-9:54 P.M.
The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted.
John Arnot represented the applicant.
Mabusth reported that the application is for a 35'x44', 3-story addition, which will double
the size of the existing structure. A variance setback was granted for a detached garage in
1984 . The detached garage will be removed when the attached garage, which is part of
the application, is built .
12
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLAJ.~G COMlvfISSION
.MEETING HELD 0Nl\1AY 15, 1995
(#8 -#2015 -Mark Harrington -Continued)
A height variance is necessary. Measurements were taken at the garage level. 3-1/21 of fill
will be added to gain positive drainage from the garage area. There will be a transition
space from the old and new construction in an attempt to stay above the septic level.
A conditional use permit will be required for a guest apartment on the upper level of the
addition. This will be non-rental and serve as a mother-in-law type apartment. Access
from the principal structure will be via a hallway. There will be three entrances. One
entrance from the outside will be by the mudroom. Another entrance will be off the
garage, with travel through the garage and up the hallway to the apartment. Another
entrance will be at the lower level basement. The basement will be accessed by a stairwell
but will not be finished at this time.
Mabusth informed the commissioners that future plan call for removal and replacement of
the original structure. The application is the first step in the improvement process.
Another addition will be placed in line with this proposed structure.
Nolan asked about the pine trees in front of the residence. Arnot said trees have already
been moved, and the trees there now will remain.
Arnot said the county has given their approval for the driveway.
There were no public comments.
Peterson said, while the Planning Commission normally takes a strong stance on grant
height variances, this is not an issue here.
Berg moved, Nolan seconded, to approve Application #2015 with the four Staff
recommendations and additional conditions as follows: 5) receipt of County pennit for
new driveway; 6) closing off the old driveway; and 7) obtaining demolition permit for the
removal of the garage. Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(#9) #2016 l\1ARK DUPONT, 2275 WEBBER HILLS ROAD -VARIANCES -
PUBLIC HEARING
The Application was tabled at the request of the applicant.
(#10) #2017 WILLIAM HIBBS, 1905 FAGERNESS POINT ROAD-VARIANCES
-PUBLIC HEARING 8:13-8:28 P.M.
The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted.
Mr. Hibbs was present.
13
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
I, Carole Haseman, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that
a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #2015, was mailed to the attached list of
property owners.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 3rd day of May, 1995.
Carole Haseman
CITY OF ORONO -NOTICE
The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley
Parkway on Monday, May 15, 1995, the meeting to commence at 7:00 p.m., on the matter of
reviewing the following land use applications:
1. #2013 The Freshwater Foundation has applied for a conditional use permit to allow the
Foundation to own and manage the Gray Freshwater Biological Institute located at 2500
Shadywood Road. The University of Minnesota has managed the Institute successfully
for approximately 20 years. Due to growing budgetary constraints , the University has
offered to return the Institute to the Foundation.
2 . #2015 Mark Harrington, the owner of the property located at 4080 Bayside Road, has
applied for a street setback variance for a proposed addition to the north and \vest side
of the existing residence. In addition, the applicant has applied for a conditional use
permit to allow a non-rental/guest apartment to be installed within the new addition .
3 . #2016 Mark Dupont, the owner of the property located at 2275 Webber Hills Road, has
applied for street and side setback variances for a garage addition to be located at the
northwest side of the existing residence.
4. #2017 William Hibbs, owner of the property located at 1905 Fagerness Point Road,
seeks approval of a street setback, side setback and hardcover variances within the 75-
250' setback area to allow the removal of the west portion of the residence and the
installation of a new two-story addition with tuck under garage to face Fagerness Point
Road .
5 . #2018 Richard Born, the owner of the property located at 1991 Fagerness Point Road,
seeks approval of a conditional use permit for the installation of a permanent dock at the
east shoreline of this property, at the approximate location of the existing dock .
6. #2019 Leise! Cox has applied for a conditional use permit for a Class 1 restaurant within
the multi-use building located at 3445 Shoreline Drive. The restaurant will have a
seating capacity for approximately 30 people and offer expresso drinks, coffee,
sandwiches and desserts .
All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this meeting. Written comments are solicited .
Plans are available iri the City offices for review, by appointment.
City of Orono
By : Planning Commission
(J _ j' t?./77./?'1,_v (}, 'Ill~ {La,d) ~ A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
To be published the week of May 1, 1995.
CITY OF ORONO -NOTICE
The Planning Commission will hold public
hearings in the Council Chambers at 2780
Kelley Parkway o n Monday, May 15, 199 5,
th e me et ing to commence at 7:00 p.m ., on
the matter of reviewing. the following land use
appl ications:
1. #2013 The Freshwater Foundation has
applied for a condttional use permtt to allow
the Foundation to own and manage the Gray
Freshwater Biological Institute located at
2500 Shadywood Road . The University of
Minnesota has managed the Institute
successfully for approximately 20 years. Due
to growing budgetary constraints, the
University has offered to return the Institute
to the Fo undation .
2 . #2015 Mark Harrington, lhe owner of
the QL_operty located at 4080 Bayside Road,
has applied for a street setback variance for
a proposed addition to the north and west
side of the existing res idence . In addition, the
applicant has applied for a conditional use
permit to allow a non-rentaVguest apartment
to be installed within the new addition.
3. #2016 Mark Dupont, the owner of the
property located at 2275 Webber Hills Road,
has applied for street and side setback
variances for a garage addition to be located
at the northwest side of the existing
res idence.
4 . #2017 William Hibbs, owner of the
.. _. ___
' .-. -. ~ ~.;:--... •.
property located at 1905 Fagerness Point
Road, seeks approval of a street setback;
side setback and · hardcover variances within
the 75-250' setback area to allow the removal
of the west portion of the residence and the
installation of a new two-story addition with
tuck under garage to face F agerness Point Road . . ·--· ·· .. -
5. #2018 Richard Born, the owrier of the
property located at 1991 Fagerness Point
Road, seeks approval of a conditional use
permit for t_he installation of ·a permanent
dock at the east shoreline of this property, at
the approximate location of the existing dock.
6. #2019 Leisel Cox has applied for a
conditional use permit for a Class 1 ·
. restaurant within the multi-use building
located at 3445 Shoreline D.rive . The
restaurant will have a seating capacity . for
approximately 30 people and offer . expresso
drinks, coffee , sandwiches and desserts. ,. -
_ All persons wishing to be heard will
appear at this meeting. Written comments
are solicited. Plans are available in the .City
offices tor review , by appoint":~~!:·. ·
City of Orono
By: Planning Commission -.
Jeanne A. Mabusth,
Bu ilding and Zoning Adn,inistrator
(Published in The Laker and Pioneer May 1,
1995)
8 1995
~---~-,0
Affidavit of Publication
State of Minnesota , County of Hennepin.
Bill Holm , being duly sworn on oath, says that he is
an authorized agent and employee of the publisher
of the newspaper known as THE LAKER, Mound,
Minnesota, and has full knowledge of the facts
which are stated below:
A .) The newspaper has complied with all the
requirements constituting qualifications as a
qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota
Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable
laws, as amended.
B.) The printed /4J 111/ ali -chcokr1 (1-') n
which is attached was cut from the columns of said
newspaper, and w _as printed and published once
each week for I successive weeks :
It was first published Monday,
the /JI day of m~ .. . 19 't,J
and was thereafter prin't and published eve~
Monday, to and including Monday,
the ___ ~~~•--• ~ Au1horizEd Agent
Subscribed and sworn to me on this
By:
. . KRISTI HOUI
NOTARY PUBIJC ~-s ■ID"\
MYCOMM.lilCPNl14141111D
(1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users
for comparable space: $11.48 per inch.
(2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter: $11.48.
(3) Rate actually charged for above matter: $6.47 per inch .
Each additional successive week: $4.45.
-
CITY of ORONO
Municipal Offices
Post Office Box 66
Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066
DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY
In accordance with M . S . 13. 04 , Subd. 2, 11 Rights of subjects of data 11
, we would like to
inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its
departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information.
You are notified that :
1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the
permit or license requested .
2. You may refuse to supply data , but refusal may require that the City deny the
permit or license.
3 . The information may be shared with other local , state or federal agencies to the
extent necessary to process the permit or license .
4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some
information may become public.
5 . You have certain rights under M .S . 13 .04 (see following page) to review private
data on yourself.
6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit.
First Middle
f!:>,A y 5 ({)£
Address
111;1./
City State
I understand my rights as stated above .
Signature
TELEPHONE-483-7357 • FAX-4~10
Last
q-3_s-7
Zip
'13/ 7 -007)
Phone
Sec.13.04 RIGHTS OF SUBJECTS OF DATA
Subdivision 1. Type of data. The rights of individual on whom the data is stored or
to be stored shall be as set forth in this section.
Subd. 2. Information required to be given individual. An individual asked to supply
private or confidential data concerning himself shall be informed of: (a) the purpose and
intended use of the requested data within the collecting state agency, political subdivision, or
statewide system; (b) whether he may refuse or is legally required to supply the requested data;
(c) any known consequence arising from his supplying or refusing to supply private or
confidential data; and ( d) the identity of other persons or entities authorized by state or federal
law to receive the data. This requirement shall not apply when an individual is asked to supply
investigative data, pursuant to section 13.82, subdivision 5, to a law enforcement officer.
The commissioner of revenue may place the notice required under this subdivision in the
individual income tax or property tax refund instructions instead of on those forms.
Subd. 3. Access to data by individual. Upon request to a responsible authority, an
individual shall be informed whether he is the subject of stored data on individuals, and whether
it is classified as public, private or confidential. Upon his further request, an individual who
is the subject of stored private or public data on individuals shall be shown the data without any
charge to him and, if he desires, shall be informed of the content and meaning of that data.
After an individual has been shown the private data and informed of its meaning, the data need
not be disclosed to him for six months thereafter unless a dispute or action pursuant to this
section is pending or additional data on the individual has been collected or created. The
responsible authority shall provide copies of the private or public data upon request by the
individual subject of the data. The responsible authority may require the requesting person to
pay the actual costs of making, certifying, and compiling the copies.
The responsible authority shall comply immediately, if possible, with any request made
pursuant to this subdivision, or within five days of the date of the request, excluding Saturdays,
Sundays and legal holidays, if immediate compliance is not possible. If he cannot comply with
the request within that time, he shall so inform the individual, and may have an additional five
days within which to comply with the request, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays.
Subd. 4. Procedure when data is not accurate or complete. An individual may
contest the accuracy or completeness of public or private data concerning himself. To exercise
this right, an individual shall notify in writing the responsible authority describing the nature of
the disagreement. The responsible authority shall within 30 days either: (a) correct the data
found to be inaccurate or incomplete and attempt to notify past recipients of inaccurate or
incomplete data, including recipients named by the individual; or (b) notify the individual that
he believes the data to be correct. Data in dispute shall be disclosed only if the individual's
statement of disagreement is included with the disclosed data.
The determination of the responsible authority may be appealed pursuant to the provisions
of the administrative procedure act relating to contested cases.
9
/aoo 1
99t?'
~~~ /6/f-1
~O I? _L ~
~o~--;----11'-~
/?' .JC~-o=:cz / ~ ~ I C, I{ 7
/1J{ ~ ~ (/Cu~
-fo ~~
~~~ ~~~ ~ o'co"
. .3 ~ I ~ /( ~I :,JJ 1/
V aA-,,,. {_ ,,..,_ f-, & 7'
\
t
/
\ l