My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1985-08-26 Resolution 1837
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
E
>
Eastlake Street
>
3444 Eastlake Street - 05-117-23-13-0043
>
Resolutions
>
1985-08-26 Resolution 1837
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2025 12:32:13 PM
Creation date
10/16/2025 12:25:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3444
Street Name
Eastlake
Street Type
Street
Address
3444 Eastlake Street
PIN
0511723130043
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO, 1837 <br />A RESOLUTION GRANTING <br />A VARIANCE TO <br />MUNICIPAL TONING CODE <br />SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 <br />FILE #976 <br />MNiR=AS, Dean i Nanc,,• Monge (hereinafter "tl,to appli- <br />cant") are owners of the property located at 3444 Eastlake Street <br />within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally <br />described as follows: <br />Lot 2, Block 1, Bayside Beach (hereinafter "property")- and <br />MHRREAS, the applicant has applied to the City For a <br />variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to <br />permit the construction of a patio located less than 75 feet from <br />the lakeshore, where no structures or hardcover are normally <br />allowed. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of <br />Orono, Minnesota: <br />FINDINGS <br />1. This application was reviewed as Zoning Fiie #876. <br />2. The property is located in the LR-lA Zoning District. <br />3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application <br />on July 15, 1985, and recommended partial approval of the <br />proposed variance based upon the following findings and <br />conditions: <br />A) The original applicant, Randy Asplund, constructed <br />the concrete patio within the 75' setback area without <br />consulting the City to determine whether such a <br />structure was allowed. <br />B) The new owners, the Monges, purchased the property <br />from Asplund after the patio was constructed and were <br />not notifies by Asplund that the patio might have to be <br />removed. <br />C) The existing patio is located totally within the 0- <br />75' lakeshore setback area, and with the adjacent side- <br />walks in the 0-75' setback area constitutes approxi- <br />mately 489 square feet of hardcover or 7.5%. <br />Page 1 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.