Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketCITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, l\1N 55323 473-7357 APPLICATION NO.1998 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION Date of Notice: 3/24/95 ________________ , __ ----------------------------------- TO: Mr. & Mrs. Craig Wicklund 30 Westwood Road Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES: John Anderson 2635 Deer Hill Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Jo Haislet Burnett Realty 1865 Wayzata Blvd. W. Long Lake, MN 55356 ----------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance DATE OF MEETING: 3/13/95 VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST -------------------------------------------------------------- COUNCIL ACTION -MOTION: To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution enclosed. Please note variance approval is limited to the extent shown on approved plan and as noted in the approval resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to further review by the City. Variance approval expires one year after date of approval. A building permit application must be submitted no later than March 13, 1996. ch MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL l\fEETING HELD ON l\'IARCH 13, 1995 (#10 -#1997 Sally and Jonathan Lebedoff -Continued) The requirement of the DNR is for a minimum setback of25' from the main lake. By moving structure 5' further from lake, the structure is now 2" from the west lot line and 70' from lagoon shoreline. The amended proposal also shows further reductions in hardcover in the 75-250'. Attornev Mitchell said that Ceil Strauss of the DNR has agreed to allow the 20' after -...., reviewal of the drav.-ings . Mitchell said the DNR was most concerned with drainage to the lake . The lakeside yard is high so water drains back and holds to the rear of the property. The improvements will reduce the hardcover by 1000 s.f Mitchell explained t hat t he house is located behind the average lakeshore setback and did not impact the neighbors. If the setback of 20' is allowed, the setback from the neighbor, Mr. Bagley, will increase to l' allowing space to access the structure if repairs are needed. Council agreed this was a better solution, but did need confirmation from the DNR on their agreement to the 2 0' lake setback. Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution #3 540 as proposed by the applicant with Staff confirmation ofDNR agreement to the 20' lake setback. Ayes 4 , Nays 0 . (#11) #1998 CRAIG \VICKLUND, 3780 BAYSIDE ROAD-VARIANCES- SOLUTION #3541 Mr. & Mrs. Wicklund were present. Mabusth reported that the residence is 60-70 years old, presently owned by the Anderson family . The Wicklunds would like to purchase the property and reconstruct a new home. The amended proposal would require area and lot width variances. There is a wetland to the north. One unit of sewer is available, and applicant would receive credit for the wetland. The 50' front/rear and 30' required side setbacks would be met. The easement driveway through the property to the immediate east has existed for years. A neighbor, Mr. Gardner, was concerned with the curb cut off Bayside and the possibility of trucks damaging this area, which is located within his property and not within the easement. The Planning Commission recommended approval. The new curb cut eliminates any problems with the neighbor's property. Both will use the drive to achieve access. The applicant is satisfied with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to adopt Resolution #3541 based on the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. Ayes 4, Nays 0 . 5 50~571 t:· \: ) (:·· ,, ;.-. '. ~-;, •.. •·• 'i'. '"\ r'~•~ •l· ;:;i I /'.' ;• ·:t·t!' ·•·• :~ i:-:..i r • .· ·. •! I ) .. .•.,.: . it :', ;} :1 ;• ·1 '•'.· . .. , I . J ... f r~/s ·1 '<1- 'l;j. ~ ex:, -.... / --- ~ --- Certificate of Survey for Jack Anderson of Lot 52, Auditor's Subdiv~sion No. 203 Hennepin County, ~irinesota N87"4-1'/C"w /49. OS ~ w \V \j/ IJf t.v .,... ----971 _ -·-.......... ~ ~ '} ~ ' I ti, ~ 0.: ~ --------------....... ...... ....... "' "-0 ' ~ ' !I .,.---........ \ i / I ~"' I "' "-) l\i ' ,_, ' " <:. ~ ~ IY l I f \ \ \ lL ~,. ~ . !· \ ~ \ I I I I I \ I I I / l \ - / / """'-,....,,.-----,,.---~ ,. -I\ \ V -._,-''\\ , .. l +--:J --\ .. --~-I/ I ' 5D' I " I .\ I I r1. f .. ',-~ I \ \ ~ \ lo I\J I ' I / I \ \ \ \ 'IJ. ~ -"' ' ~ 'J. ' ~ <:. ~ ~ Legal Description Lot 52, Auditor's Subdi v ision No. 2Q3, Hennepin Count y , Minnesota. This survey shows the location of an existing house, shed and well on the above described property, and to po- graphy as supplied from the City of Orono maps . It does not purport to show any other improvements or en- croachments. o: iron marker N5''J "4<1 '/o~'W_ /J, .--'118--: Existii:ig contour frbm city maps /CJ!" ,.(,(f",f = /,5"CJ ~ AOff ,---·-······--_,. __ ,_ ~ a~~ 3 --/a~r.s ·-· I hereby certify that this survey w .1~ prepared by me or under my direct super- vision, and that I am a duly regisll'red Civil Enginl'l'r ,rnd Lrnd Surwyor unckr the laws of the State of Minnl'sot;i . ~~--- Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota.Ucehse Number 12755 D A TE /-2.S--95" SCALE / ,, = 4 0 -' JOB NO . 9 S -/ 5 March 7, 1995 Mr. and Mrs. Craig Wicklund 30 Westwood Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Wicklund: CITY of ORONO Street Address: 2 7 50 Ke! ley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Municipal Offices Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-C::J66 Please review the enclosed staff memo and approval resolution that shall be presented to the Council for formal action at their March 13th meeting. You are asked to review the resolution and contact staff if you have any questions prior to the Council meeting. Sincerely, (J~~_.c_) c;-,~ u,0~<~C-, r-c _,,t/ ~4, Jeanne A. Mabusth " Building & Zoning Administrator JAM/ch Enc. Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator DATE: March 7, 1995 ITEM NO.: Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #1998 Craig Wicklund, 3780 Bayside Road -Variances -Resolution Zoning District: LR-lA Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.23, Subd. 6(B) -Lot area and lot width variances. A. Lot area Required = 87, 120 s. f. or 2 acres Existing= 65,560 s.f. or 1.51 acres (17,582 s.f. or .4 acres of wet. Per Section 10.55, Subd. 15(A-2), wetland areas can be credited for sewered properties) Variance = 21,560 s.f. or .49 acres or 24.7% B. Lot width Required = 200' Existing = 149' Variance = 51' or 25.5% C. Applicant had originally proposed a front street/street setback variance to the Planning Commission but amended application to exclude the request for the front setback variance. The Planning List of Exhibits Commission's recommendation dealt only with the lot area and lot width variance. A -Application B -Plat Map C -Property Owners' List D -Addendum E -Topographic Map/2' Contours F -Neighboring Property Owners' Acknowledgment Forms G -Burgers Bayside Second Addition Plat -Location of Access Easement H -Deed Recognizing Access Easement I -Existing Site Plan Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 3 March 7, 1995 Zoning File #1998 J -Property to South's Survey (Gardiner, 3770 Bayside Road) K -Staff Sketch L -Elevations M -Floor Plan N -Revised Plan 0 -Gardiner Letter Description of Request The applicant proposes the removal of the existing structure and to rebuild a new residence with attached garage requiring area and width variances as set forth above. Applicant's application originally involved a request for a front street setback variance but chose to amend the application before the Planning Commission when it appeared that the setback variance would be denied. Review Exhibit N, applicant has presented a revised proposal showing the house meeting all required setbacks of the LR-lA Zoning District. The property was served with sewer with the recent sewering of Stubbs Bay area. The existing residence is currently not connected to sewer but has been assessed one sewer unit. Municipal sewer lines are located within the utility easements within a 16 ½' utility easement along the south lot line of Lot 2, Burgers Bayside Second Addition (refer to Exhibit G). Lot 52 of Auditor's Subdivision No. 203 was created in October of 1928. The property achieves access via a nonexclusive 16 ½' easement located within the same area of the municipal easement for sewer at the south lot line of Lot 2, Burgers Bayside Addition. Review Exhibits B, J and N, the property owners to the immediate south advised that the existing curb cut at Bayside serving both residences intersects their property. They have asked that construction vehicles not use this portion of the drive. Applicants shall develop a curb cut within their legal access corridor. Statement of Hardship 1. The house has existed on this site for over sixty years. 2. The property was approved for sewer in 1992 and assessed one sewer unit. 3. There is an adequate building envelope to permit the construction of a new residence on the property without need for setback variances. 4. The property is located within the 250-500' setback zone from the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka and would be allowed a total of 19,668 s.f. of hardcover improvements. Planning Commission Recommendation Request for Council Action continued page 3 of 3 March 7, 1995 Zoning File #1998 Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the lot area and lot width variance to permit new residential construction on the 1. 51 acre property subject to the following conditions: 1. New residence structure must be connected to sewer. 2. Applicant to provide detailed grading and drainage plans for walkout design with application for building permit. 3. Applicant shall install curb cut within the legal 16½' wide access at Bayside Road. Applicant is further advised to contact Hennepin County DOT for the necessary permits for work within the right-of-way. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To either adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution based on the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. ch A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6(B) FILE #1998 WHEREAS, Craig Wicklund (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 3780 Bayside Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 52, Auditor's Subdivision No. 203, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10. 23, Subdivision 6(B) to permit the construction of a new principal structure on a property that consists of 65,560 s.f. or 1.51 acres where 87,120 s.f. or 2 acres is required and on a lot that measures 149' at the 50' front street setback where a 200' width is required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1998. 2. The property is located in the LR-lA, Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 2 acres in area. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 22, 1995, and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following unique findings and hardships: A. The house has existed on this site for over sixty years. Page 1 of 5 B. The property was approved for sewer in 1992 and assessed one sewer unit. C. There is an adequate building envelope to permit the construction of a new residence on the property meeting all setback and hardcover requirements of the LR-lA Zoning District. D. The property is located within the 250-500' setback zone from the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka and would be allowed a total of 19,668 s. f. or hardcover improvements. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivisions 6(B) to permit construction of a new principal structure granting an area variance of 21,560 s.f. or 24. 7% and a lot width variance of 51' or 25. 5 % , subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 5 1. New residence structure shall be served by an approved sewer stub available to the south of the property. 2. Applicant to provide detailed grading and drainage plans for walkout design residence with application for building permit. 3. Applicant shall install a new curb cut at Bayside Road in order to not encroach upon the property located at 3770 Bayside Road. 4. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (March 13, 1996). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heir, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 5 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 13th day of March, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner( s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of March, 1995, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this _______ day of __________ , 199_ before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared --------------------------known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this _______ day of __________ , 199_before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared --------------- -----------known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 5 To: From: Date: Chair Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator February 10, 1995 Subject: #1998 Craig Wicklund, 3780 Bayside Road -Variances -Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-lA Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) -Area, lot width and front setback variances. A. Lot area Required = 87,120 s.f. or 2 acres Existing = 65,560 s .f . or 1.51 acres (17,582 s.f. or .4 acres of wet. Per Section 10.55, Subd . 15 (A) (2), wetland areas can be credited for sewered properties.) Variance = 21,560 s.f. or .49 acres B. Lot width Required = 200' Existing = 149' Variance = 51' or 25.5 % C. Front setback Required = 50' Existing = 46' Proposed = 26' Variance = 24' or 48 % List of Exhibits A -Application B -Plat Map C -Property Owners' List D -Addendum E -Topographic Map-2' Contours F -Neighboring Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form G -Burgers Bayside Second Addition Plat-Location of Access Easement H -~ed Rec9gnizing Access Easement I --~.¼t!J.HS1te Plan J -Property to South's Survey (Gardiner) K Staff Sketch L -Elevations M -Floor Plan ~ Zoning File #1998 February 10, 1995 Page 2 Description of Request Lot 52 was part of a larger parcel acquired by the current owners in 1911 (refer to Exhibit H). Auditor's Subdivision No. 203 was filed in October of 1928. An easement described as a rod wide (16½ ') was created in 1911 over the Burger property at the time the larger parcel was created. The easement in later years served not only the Anderson parcel but the former Miner residence on Lot 53 of that same Auditor's Subdivision. The same non- exclusive easement continues to serve the Anderson property. There is some controversy as to whether the deed for Lot 52 was updated to reflect right to the use of the easement. There is nothing to suggest in the original Deed that the access easement was an exclusive easement and that when Auditor's Subdivision No. 203 was approved1Lot 52 would not be made deliberately landlocked. Refer to Exhibits Band J. The owner of the property to the immediate south has installed a garage within a 30' public alley to the south. Landmark Drive does not abut the property. The only available access to this site is via the 16 ½' wide easement. The property was served with sewer with the recent sewering of the Stubbs Bay area. The existing residence is currently not connected to sewer but has been assessed one sewer unit. Municipal sewer lines are located within the utility easement along that same 16 ½' corridor of Lot 2, Burgers Bayside Second Addition (refer to Exhibit G). It is the intention of the applicant to take down the existing structures and rebuild a new residence with attached garage requiring area and width variances. Refer to Exhibit D, applicant claims certain hardships with relocating a new residence structure meeting the required 50' front setback. Statement of Hardship Applicant's addendum notes the following hardships: 1. Applicant claims existing house and proposed house will be located on a natural knoll defined at the 942' and 940' elevations. If the house was located further back on lot, it would sit much lower and based on the walkout design may create water problems for new residence. 2. The well is located right in the central portion of the building envelope. The well was installed in 1989 and applicant wishes to continue use of well. 3. Placement of garage and storage area reduces length of driveway and minimizes hardcover. 4. Allowing structure to be placed more to the south will save two mature trees on property. Impact of residence being placed 26' from south lot line is minimized by existing growth of trees and shrubs along the south lot line of the property. Zoning File #1998 February 10, 1995 Page 3 Staff would add the following for the area and lot width variance: 1. The house has existed on this site for over 50 years. 2. The property was approved for sewer in 1992 and assessed one sewer unit. 3. Refer to Exhibit K. There is an adequate building envelope to permit the construction of a new residence on the property. 4. The property is located within 250-500' of the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka and would be allowed a total of 19,668 s.f. of hardcover improvements. Issues for Consideration 1. At the time a property is to be completely redeveloped, is it appropriate to consider location of an existing well as a reason for granting setback variances? Refer to Exhibit K. The house can be readjusted to meet the 50' setback and also not be forced into the northern tree line. It will line up approximately with the rear of the existing detached garage. 2. Hardcover does not appear to be a problem for this property and should not be used as a reason for granting a setback variance for new construction. 3. Upon your site inspection, review the elevations to the rear of the detached garage. Is there adequate room to create a walkout and also minimize any tree removal to the north? Note the drainageway within the tree line that runs from the west to the east property line. 4. The house has been designed to take advantage of lakeviews to the southeast. Can this be achieved if house is moved 24' to the northeast? 5. Other issues raised by Planning Commission. Options of Action Approval as proposed if members feel applicant has demonstrated suitable hardships for the granting of a front setback variance, OR Partial approval granting the area and lot width variance but requiring that structure be placed at the conforming setbacks. Zoning File #1998 February 10, 1995 Page 4 lsv Any recommendation of approval must include the following conditions: 1. New structure must be connected to sewer. 2. Applicant to provide detailed grading and drainage plans for walkout design with application for building permit. CITY OF ORONO -VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $200.00 ($50 .00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $20 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION l Site Address 3 7 <; D BO-! s e.. 9'· . ~.-~ . ·(-Cj '. i:~,J . Property Identification Number (P.I. -. A-u d ; +o c ~ 1' on -t:k.J-<Y~ .L.o+-S -~L Attach legal description to application if~ot i?cluded on r~uired survey . -fl, ~:• '.,/'-':-';-'~;2~;;.~-r- Date Property Acquired C.Jc,s //\_~ D 0-f.e_ sa..+ ~r f1 ~c~ i5 (month/.y~aij:-'-'' J~::, ,v, ,'f· I (do) (do no!) also own the adjacenparcels of land . , ,_,c,, ·· ·· :.~.'! '~J~,>,=xx Present use of property: -X_residential __ other (specify) "·''~fE:_;_,:··~i.:. ½/4,:,C,/\flifv Zoning District: ,t,j.'·o?2D c\\;l it:,1 7J.:::).1 OWNER (if different than iflicapt) Name I o h "to de.rs 6 0 Address: J. (p 35" J2c'->--b;)) R&. Phone (home) -</7 ( ..._ 7 S-7 f,., Phone(work) ~'73 -tD '2 Cp u.)°1) 2-a.. k Zip: ~3'7 / Phone(home) '17 3 -o/3 f (;, Phone (work) f7 '/-3 719 City: b-4(,\.0 I f#c. Jn,,,, Zip: 553 JC:, J DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost$ :/I J 7 0 0 O o L? c? Describerequestindetail : To c e..01 0 q e.. -e..')c'.1<.:>±,1 (\~ hu,; \ J ,' n ~~ Q,_I\ t Q,{')a~t'r ltL+ N e'.--.u h o"ll e OQ /.S g__ce:e < l-o± (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED ~ Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover __ Lot Coverage _JS_ Setback: :l_ Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore __ Other (specify) _______________________ _ HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS .": . 7 /~:::: ·.., "-· I·' / :-' Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: Ne. w Cc, ~ -;; t,,.. u-c.. f/ o Y\. o ,,.... / .l.-a.. a.. c., e. L "f... U ~ r i e,_ n e_ e. o o -( I' o Q .\ 5 <2.... t-8 a. d (. (.;5 e e a fl-cu. h ~ J E: h.--e. e_. :±:) (attach additional sheets if necessary) 7 REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete: 1. _ Completed Application Form 2. _ Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). 3. _ Plat Map ( obtained with property owners list). 4. _ Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required . In addition , provide one (1) copy 8½ 11 x l l II for reproduction. 5. __ Topographic survey ( existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (l ) copy 8½" x 11 " for reproduction. 6. _ Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8½ 11 x ll 11). 7. _ List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). 8. __ As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 9. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applic ant , and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if t he above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/ or consultant expenses incurred in review of fttis application, and certifies that the information supplied is and co ec to • st f his/her knowledge . Applicant's Signature Date I b 7 /4 £ ~~µ.<l'-F79 '--6,-4-P'l7'==--=<-""--~--7 7 The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members , and Council members for purposes of inve . · erifi on of this request. Owner's Signatu L~~'q___L::...-'=..4~~~:::=...:::=---~ Date ,;;4s-:-/9s;- / Applicant must havf all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 8 ~ (22) ( 23) 54 (4) ' 56 ( 33) (21) ___,,,,.._ :ri ~ 347. 14 ~ N89'35'41"'# 1§ N O · N ~ .... I ~ ~N f'\I :: 4 • r--.. i ~ f -~ ~ () 6 - • ... ~ in ISr ~1 '- @ ~· ~ (§) ~ ~ d ".9.9 . "2 ,.,.,. ™'"'! (§) ~ ~- ~ @ID ' <". : o>s. ~ _ ± -·r -·:r-~ w ;.. 0 z ~ ,r. ill "' N N,99'35'41''# 575.16 0'5-117-23-23 i ~ ' '¾Ii 52~64 4 ., 5 .. 521.85 (39) · ~ ~ 518 .06 6 (!3) ( 14) 7 ~ ( 15) e s10 . •e ( 16) 9 :(16. 7 ( 17) 10 489. 1 ==-·~· ~·"' ,-.N \rl :_ 0, - -~6o ..... ,l:;;:t_•.,,. ~~ .. . 6 ~ 8 ~~ ~ • ~ i Jg ti ~ ~ ~· ~ ~ ~ ~l ~ ~ ,"-' ; '- "' <\J 55 2 20) ~ "' ?1:8 IO • 00> . ..,. or<> ,.,, 10 I 9 I e \\9o9 ~ERl~L ?~QiOJ 66 ( I 12) IO ..,. ~ <D .., ;:.. ... 0 0 z :8B .t~ UJ N ..,. JJ@!PJ J ( 13) "' .,; <;;::. tr/lh "1q w/@1, 2 ( 12) ✓• ···-··;;, 48 ( I) $@~ t 0 o.., -1. ·o,:_.., (. s, 'V• 'oCb "<9 -.. . 9s }103,r 'o~ '<·.':,& ©~~4 . 4 /J ( 14) 1 ( I I 4& :::.::~' a::: ~ <C I : . 0.. . 15 14 / "--------·•-····-·-··-·····-·-·--··-···-··-~~ \\~ l -~~------------------------·-····-·--·L----·---··-· 67 s,uees '2)-. '{ ~ ~ '--~==~--- -- RUN DATE 01/27/95 BATCH 505 PROP AOOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PRQP AOOR 01-'-lNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP.AOOR Ol~NER Nf\ME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP ·AOOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER, . NAME/AO OR -PROP ADDR OWNER NAME 38 05-117-23 21 0005 03780 BAYSIDE RO HAZEL ANDERSON HAZEL ANDERSON 3780 BAYSIDE RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 21 0020 03750 BAYSIDE RO JOHN & MARY JANE BURGER CHRISTINE & GARY VALERIUS 3750 BAYSIDE RO. . LONG LAKE MN 55356 38. 05-117-23 22 0013 00048 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED O,S PERKINS & PM PERKINS DANIELS & PATRICE M'PERK.INS 55 LANDMARK OR ORONO MN 55356. 38 05-117-23 23 0037 00255 LANDMARK OR MARK L & KARENA S CASEY MARK L & KARENA S CASEY 4320 ENCHANTED OR MOUND MN . 55364 38 05-117-23 24. 0102 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED. S & C GARDINER STEVE GARDINER 3770 BAYSIDE RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 TAX.PAYER TOTAL BATCH 505 00015 NAME/AODR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION.SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 05-117-23 21 0016 03700 BAYSIDE RO J. B MAUS & J E MAUS . JAME$ B & JOANE MAUS 3700 BAYSIDE RO LONG LAKE MN ,55356 38 05-117-23 22 0010 00055 LANDMARK OR D S PERKINS & PM PERKINS ·DANIELS & PATRICE M PERKINS 55 LANDMARK DR ORONO MN 55356 38 05-117-23 22 0014. 00185 LANDMARK DR R F & K A KYLE. RICHARD F & KATHLEEN A KYLE 1140 TONKAWA RO' LONG LAKE MN. 55356 38 05-117-23 24 0100 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED. S & C GARDINER STEVE GARDINER 3 770 BAYSIDE RO LONG,LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 24 0103 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED S & C \,ARDINER STEVE GARDINER 3770 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 REPORT NO, .PI43540l PAGE 14 38 05-117-2.3 21 0019 00050 LANDMARK OR JAMES & PATRICIA TODD JAMES & PATRICIA TODD 169 MEADOW LA · LONG LAKE MN. 55356 38 05-117-23 22 0011 00175 LANDMARK DR LC HARREN & J M HARREN LEE C & JULIE M HARREN 175 LANDMARK DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 23 0036 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED LANDMARK DR HOMEOWNERS ASSOC LANDMARK DR HOMEOWNERS ASSOC· C/0 LEE C HARREN 175 LANDMARK DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 24 0101 03770 BAYSIDE RD S.& C GARDINER STEVE GARDINER 3770 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 24 0111 03775 BAYSIDE RD G R & CE RONLETr'E GERALD L ROWLETTE 3775 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 -.. I RUN DATE 01/27(95 BATCH 505 "" HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 15 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS.REPRESENTEB ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNT.Y DEPARTMENT O.F PRO·P~TY TAXATION, TO. TH·E· .BEST OF MY KNONLEDGE AND BELIEF: .. a ~ .. _ ? DATE 'JD" t.5 BY .. ~~ 3780 BAYSIDE ROAD Proposed new construction home location for a 1.5 acre lot with existing home to be removed. Topog lines 942 & 940 create a natural knoll for the best building site. The existing house is located on this knoll. If the new house is located further back on the lot, to lines 938 & 936, it will sit much lower and could block the natural water flow of that lower area. During heavy rains this might create water problems in the in the new house. The present well location is also a consider- ation for the new construction site. This is a very good and useable well which was drilled in 1988. It does create some problems in placing the home with consideration to well set backs and the fact that it is centrally located on the lot. Placing the garage, which also serves as small boat storage and shed, on the south side of the house minimizes driveway hard cover and saves existing trees. The south side of this lot touches an easement which is shared with the Gardiners. There is tree and shrub growth which creates a natural privacy for both lots along this easement. X 931 .6 X 932. 5 I ( Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form I (we) Cto,@2 ~(tJOKt; &-4<►1~&( of 37;:z> ~Yf'l.~c . [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed !Q.e plans for _the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 3,Z 5[ 0 ~t,~/})Calso referred to as Land Use Application No. . . I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. ~~ ~~7;/t/?7)~ Property Owner Property Owner Date ****************************************************************************** I (we) of --------------------------- [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at __________ also referred to as Land Use Application No. ___ _ I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. 9 0 !.() ,_ 0 _J ,_ ::> 0 I M ,zv 90o0S I I ~ (0 Lu a'\ ~:/ t-. (>~ ~ ::; ·~ q., ) ::---,. ~ d/9£--:•,_.-'-'- -----••• ·.. "-1 0 er-~--ef·: .-. "L:, · .. \QJ ~c:: -"'·: ·---~ IZ, Q:, : •••••• • (>Ci, -C /J ;·.: ... ;-·i•: ~ (_:) _1 Q:,1/ ,: ::~ 0 -: ., 1!'1,5) oo'I .DI I ~ \ r )-, .,..-········,~0~; (!) -; \... -..J ov-\,,...--->-. , .;v r,... '-1" ' ·····-. r9 / CII ~ lJJ f: · ,~ o : /.-.. • .._, > o f' -., 0) ; /. ~/ 0 I J ~ j!() i ~I !::: CD f ~~/ ,;J (.__ oo·oif'zg ~}t:..-· .. \ z ·. ---_.L_ -------------·---,.-.. •Z£ IL., ,.. OL"9£1 ··--_: ,1 .--···R,• ___ •_----------------------=•~----e:-....i------.~-zo·eg9 3 .. <;;Z,lloO N C) --f\ I I \I ____ ... ,_ .. l>\\... ........ .L.L=:=7> (J \-I \.I \ I I I L_, ........ 89"61?£ ,_, .J C\I oo·ovv ~ ~) 0 ) ,, ----_, :: ...J ~ 1- w a w w (f) :i-lcl"'l'l\l '"IS :H:I :I 1-1.L ·.,---- -u. u. 0 (.) ! - ! r- 1 I J f L. ' ~ l { > {' ~ ,..... ' .-,, ~ m: . (..~ ?' r . m ID: • . . I , ~ o: !" ' ~ '· I I ~ ., • , ' ~ I I . ' ! r • J I I '-~ • • ·' ~ . • : , . I , ' . . ~ ~ -~ ~ ..,..,, -~ ":;\ ~ ~ ·-o· --➔ ~ ..... • ~ ~ 1--. ... ;:j. ~ k ~ .,;:, ._, . .... ~ .... l---:.,_ -z'.. ._, ~ J•----• .:J .,.. .;. ___ --• __ ~--:.-;--~--,~---_ . :;_;..·-_,,_,___ _ -i·::,-: , -~ -~-:J_·---~_:_::-~-~-=---~_--:---~---_:~,_-_-_-...... '._·_·-=-·_:~-~-'-_:.~-~:_--:._ _-_-·_-~-;_-.-.-,_-_-_-: -__ -.-_·t:_-:·-----_" ___ ----~-~-: ___ ,_-_~ -•;•~_-i._:_~ _ _,•~--~-~=.:._: __ -__ ·:~-~-=-__ ;.::;.._~_. ___ :_~-_~.:_ .. :. ___ -~_--~=-·~--~----~:-~_:_:;_~_:_:.._.-~-~.:~:-_::-~·:~.~-:.,,-: __ ·}:0_.~-~-~-:~_-_-_1_:_~_~-~~--::-~--~-~-::·_.-:_-::---->'= :~_:_~~-~----~~-1-~--~l_~_-_:·~--~_::_~t-=-_f_.~_-.:_:_~-~-. -:;~ 1i.::~-;~c:-\~~~t {;; ·~ . :5~~~~::?:f~"=i-==ifi~~J-i~';;"~::~ . -•--~--=---. . . .: ii~--7 ~--• -,~ . --_-: _ ---:_. ,:;;,-~ -~=- -.a1.-JZ~~..::....:..~~~~~~----=~~~-:-_:__--:-__:_ ___ __;__~-~--~~~~~~ 0.: ..... ......... '-; -: H· ! o; 4--~ 1!:1 ..-~ -,.:, ~; _ .. :· , .. ~ ~ ·::-........ q ~ ~t .: ·•• ,-. ;;.,.-,. 0~ I ·~:ts.::~. !£b ~ ~~ = ~.' . :_ ~ ; " i ~ -~-=s~r{ ~ •·· 1 ~:-i . .-. . ~ -4 · 1 f~ ~ ~ ;~ .. z ~~[ :·. r:~ -j ~l · t ~ ; t~-~ g ·;~,:-, : :~:. i ~ ~ :a-_il. -: : ~ .. "1;'; ~ 4.::> .. _. ·. __ _. ~ ~ : ":ci : ..,.:.. : 0 ·":.='·. r:, ~ C : ~: t ti ! ;-µ:j · ·'1 r ,i i. J : !. ; ~ : : ~ a:;:: ~ ~: l ~ : -: : rl j:!l : ~ : t .-. : . : : ~ ~: : ~" i t ~ ! : : .-{ o: ~ ; 1--r • • ,i;:-,_ ,__! In f ~ ~ ~ ... : Pf~: ~ t ~ ~rl. ~' ~'<) lt· .a -~ ~ i [ ~ i ~ i :;:__ ~ $.'; 1 c~ ..;.:t ~i ( R ~ ~ ~ -! £ d ~~: J j; ~ ~ i ~~.3. lJ~" , -: • • ... ' '-> t:;:3: j : : -: ' :t-C~ : .. : : : ; ;:, . ~ -! • : P : at --2 ;r-0 ~ _--c ! • ~ .. ~ -I ~ ~ . .,. ~ •,!'I ~ ,_ I :I ~ ~ ~ .,__~ .!; ~ ~ : : ~ ~ f -.. f J?A-:;5 ! ~ I • l -5 ~ f ~1§ : ~ ; ' ~ l _.-h : ~ : ~ ~~~ LO ~ -: 0 : i t a~ _r-. CY.> r: . . • ...., -..-I -___:a ii ,, -~ ~ ~ <::> •,---~ ·~ : l ;t:~ -...r -,a I t j. • 7 ... ; \ 0 '~ : ; ! .a ~ f--,· ::r::: C> 0:) -= -·· . -- :;,. ·. -. -· -·- .~~;.:;~~ ·. . . ::-- . · . -· .. -· . -.;:.... =-----=-----~·-_:. -; ~- .:-:. ....;...-: ..,.-· .. ·e-· ·.p~ . . . '- '!';;;:' ~~~.; ~ : .. --- .· .... •. . D:l V f f .{:-: ~-~~; .J__i ~2· ·':___:....= -------=---_:_-----=-~;~~.;;I~ .. _..:.· _______ -:---:-~-::·~~-=--~J.-t:i':s2~~:;;ii~~;:-:~::::-=::-==-,-=-:'?-~·-::-;~~it~~i~~0~{f:'Q~G.?:~:i6- . : -·-_f_;~_ :~ ;: ,. ';.,>~ -:-::.-~~.. 17-: -.. -f·":,;~i-.;j~~{r;,{:.F~0?~!f!=-~...:;;~t7:f~¥?~~~;;:" ;,.:-,-.•~ ";'."~5'!'-= : --· ~-, .,. .';Cc-••• . - r ,·· ,/l'.:' ,, •;r.·· ::;;;' t lk if\" ~-f ·· · 563571 I· 1,j, -. U..;,, .. ••111, "l;f·!1\11!1-, ... 1 •• !:,j, ' :i:' l· l' ,~lj'' ', , i·• .. ',1' .;, :{{ :~ i ., ··:J,. F 1:1-11:· 1~ 1 _ ,i. ~\'. I~ './..-. ~~; ~,·:j :~-,-- \;1:t "I , ;•••~it• ~ ~ i I I ..,_ '\;f. ~ ~ ' / .-- ---- - 'II Certificate of Survey for Jack Anderson of Lot 52, Auditor's Subdi vts ion No. 203 . ' '. ) Hennepin County, M1rt9esota N 9 7°44 '/1> "w /-!'I. OS ' I ~ ~' ·. I yv '.,. ~ '} ~ \jl I ~ I I.II ~ ---------------IV 0-: ~ - -/ __ 97,; _ ----------... , -........ --_...__ .......... -------' ' " '-0 ' ~ ' ~ I ,,, --~ -. , '\ '\ ~ ~ \ 'I-I ti ) ... ~ ,_ ·• .... ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ £Xl 1r/V(; ~W£lL -,/lJ .\ \ \ ' \ \ \ \ \ \ ,. \ \ '- ' \ '\ >'s,y \ .99, \ ?{9 \ ' \ '"<' \. ' " '------- ' ' \ ' _/ ' ' \ H o Zo.z I : / "J;/ ~1/ l fl I' NS"J"4-l'H·"'W 148,SO £'x1i-l-1•~ Fie.I ~ \ \o I\J I ' / I I I I \ '13 ' \ .. \ ~ \ ---22.2.--· ve,,, cc,3 -•.12.s .. -- ~ ' 'I- "' ' ~ C) I ~ I I ! Legal Description Lot 52, Audit o r's Subdivis i on No. 203, Hennepin County, Mi nnesota. This survey shows the location of an ex isting house, shed and well on the above described property, and topo- graphy as supplied from the City of Orono maps. It does not purport to show any other improvements or en- croachments. o: iron marker ,--'JJ8 --: ExistiQg contour from city maps ✓or ,t(/U",f = /,Yo± AO€f ,~---...,,.. .... , .. ,_,.., .... .._, ____ .,.....,... ... ~ E:x;~...J.;0 <'-) hu'Y\-c \\ a~ ~?.:~,,~,,~~~~!~~,.. ,!~~ ~ 4~2 _!_,1111,ir,Kk Awm1t· • Lun~ IAikt•, MN ~~Ji6 (,12--F~--H-tl I hereby certify that this survey w,1s prepared by me or under my direct super- vision, and that I am a duly regisil'red Civil Engineer and Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota,. DATE /-25"-'JS SCALE / ,, :40" Mark ~~755 JOB NO. 'JS'-IS 15;~/S / ·. 50° 14·4z ··w .r./ ~-<'-.,{':". {:~~0 · 1 ... , ' ,_ .... -,· ./ ..>--~ ;'/ ~ ~ ✓-,· ..0 ,· ~ -.. ;> -~ ,· .24 .'~- I _.,.. ~-"' V, 00 J) 0 ..... ~ N ~ rti, .. I I I , ....... , (;) , -,; C, ~ ,. \ N 0 --.J v,> 6' I I ~ I I I 0 .. ,-_, --3 r:: < rr; > I , ==·· ,: J:: r:-: z C"l > I ::c '-' I z I L •J I .,,,_ I I l I I ! l'ltfl ·•~su~~~a:u~~--~.-..~.1:ll".!DltC:•ca.wnrAl~~~-xm:,tteJerSJIW ...... ~!"llWU ... "IJM.r«a.ll~~ '· j· ~:-. l, ,, ~: '-•·•· '.,.-ii•• .. ~ . ,,.,. i: -~,t· i. t.! ~, ... : ' .. ·, ;f~ ~·· . ~:: ·.: ,, ·:; ~ ~ <:i 'J. \J. Certificate of Survey for Jack Anderson of Lot 52, Auditor's Subdivj1 sion No. 203 Hennepin County, Minnesota I ' ..,_ '\J- ,v87"1-.r,r'1c"w 147. os y \(/ \V IJI w IV ~ ~ '} "' I I . ~ ~ ti:, ' (Y o-,; 0-l / 'i ·, I ~ __.-:-9J1 ---''-•. ,,,~ r · I ' ..._ ·• \ I _.-, : ' -:--, 1A--- '/ . I -. --l .. : ' ! . . :--t' --' I I • • • :--• _,... .--j ! ! . J I, '1 ! I 'I . ;, .... I \ I : I I I I . : I I . I : ' . . I :, I , I 1 1 l 1 , , , 1' 1 . , I ; I ! ,, : ; I I '1• : '1 / 1 ;I 1 , • , 1· ! , .~ .._ _ I / ! I .! , j . 1 , 1 1 i ,~ . I -----.._. ) I ' ' I . ·'· :i l . ! : :; Ii ;--J-.' ) :· i ; ! i\ :J ' I i j \ .-: :' ' ; --,.._! ' I ' \ i' I l l . I I ,) ; I : . ;....._ I I I ! ,: • ' I i .: I I l ...... ! ' l Ii •. I ! l • I . 'a ; : ':--... . I• , .. J l j I i ~ i I ,' ' 1 i i, 1 t:;i· ci , r' ~ ) · ., \ ·1 j \ 1 ,---, I I 1-_ ~I l.-rt 1 1' 1' I.,. .. ,, I ... ·-"r 1:.'f,-,'; I I .\' t '-_.:., tx117i"J hc11.1c -f· s "eJ T. l.e · i--e,...,oved Ex 1<;1;t\'.) N il·f-v rl I Tt·e t' f E:11.,e,-,.,~ll\1 : , r:ir_ !-!r--_.i i 1: , . , ~ I i 1· , ( il..1 1 I' : I i'. n :, ·1 1· :, ,I I i I . J '1r :I : I\:: ;t I I I r. 'I ,1 l , ~ I i ,. . ';' ~ I.J ' i' ; t . j I !! i . I ! I • • ' : i I ! ' :~ ~ "!_ ( ! t 1 ; '•:: .' I i : I ·1:l I ! i I (i \ I\; ~ ; ;~, 1# I q~v <t-qL.f2 Toi'" • ,, ' . • . I. ~ : \ ' ': ·1 . ! I I I . / .. ~ " ' ·~ •J l I / / I t · 1 '-'r , , 1 i l . 1 : , _ · ! ! 1 11. '\}. () I ,' .f I ," / I ' . ' ~ I 1· ,, 1·· .,-., .',~ i ; i ' I Ii ,i I 1•_.,._. ·j l I / ' L ~ ' ; • . t ,j I .) :•' I . I ~ h () i ' I I,. • :; ': . I /. t! ~-1 ; ! , ~ ~ . 1: ~ \ f ii ! . · , l · ~ I \J l I ., ',1 / I ;., ' '. . I ' . :: :: _ I:;., '{1 i ;], \ :l i '.~1 I i i : ,; l.} ~ i•: f ; 'I t ! 1 l ·: \ :: i I . } I' ' !, ... ~ .. ' \ '\li .. \ I ,~. ~ '\ Ji!.>.,,.,,;,,.. r -r 1 cxt1r1v.c ,• jl~ i:•"-• , -, ''h W£1t--"'e .. ' ;:J/)f ~ I r~ ~-~. ·1J· J.t~t9~~:r:;l:~-~-:v~l-· , 1 ~ '-l'' 0 ,{0~ ''JI I , ·"'-~· ,'--'r-at'-(.-,,, · 'l · ' -;•: 1:; J. ~~~_,-_11-1lf' / -J f... I ,. l,.r 1/ c~-,, ~ 3 1 Legal Description Lot 52, l\uditor's Subdivision No·~ 203, Hennepin County, Minnesota . {_'-1 .' '°"'t' ... I ,-a~ /-.i\ . I, ·-Q 'f ·. ,1~·\t.. G,.r, l~tQ?_._ !bf, !},_,_·i \ ."" -; .. 5 r I ' ··' rk1., " '¾,, M,a ','. . /" • \ J ·a-,.,._ Boat" . I . .v I . I \ ...... ...... This survey shows the location of c1n existing house, shed 2111cl \vcl.l on the above described (?ro[)erty, c111tl topo- graphy as supplied from the City o( Orono maps. It does not purport: to show any other improvcrncnts or en- croachments. \ .,. , ,/ ~~ ,·•, 30' -. ,1/t'1• 1,,~ ◄. 4/t \ :::; I ,, D' ., ... ··-.. ...,,_ I :1 .. I' / . ~C) -:, j ' ' ----.... .. , . ., ' 's-1 ---- . • ' 5': ·.,. ~ -. I.' !7t' J ; \ c, . ·---=-I I, I /1 /\ '\ . r·, --1-j.•() ,<. •i \ •.,. \ • I I \': 6" ' ' .· ,· I \ ti° I I . , \ I\ ...... o: iron marker I I i' . I'! .-~'lJe--: Existii:ig contour [ro111 ci\-.';' tnilp'.: ./or .{,(.L{ = I.Yo.! ,IOU' A ..... ' " " ' /!' •r•-t•,..,•,~v.,, .. , .. ----• ♦ ,,., ·•.-t1r-,---........... ~---··· ...... #-•----,! l---'------ ~=:in,,,,,.,n i$ ION 141 diii..l:lii kli'IFWMIJ, f ~:m:altttOL.>Llliil f/UJTR7T't:Yn:a:7JU::C:ur::ee,r,nnrrr~~.,....Lr.:tn.'2UJoo~L. I hereby certify that this survey 1,·,1~ prq1<1rl'd by ml' or under my dirl'ct Sllf'l'r· vision, ,1nd that I <1111 i1 duly regi:,;IL"rl'd Civil Enginl'l'r <111tl l.,rnd Survt')'lll' ulllkr the l,1ws of the St<1tl' of tvlinnt':-;t1l<1. Mk~/~~?!' !\lark S. Gronberg lvlinm·sot,1. Licehse Nu 111be(12755 !MIi: /-.?>-95" ~:C .. \I.F / :./:....., / JU!l ,:\J 95" -/5 t:..1"U'...NMIJ1cm.u.r;:._"1-w•,su~•-=--x•r.a;:,,,-r.a.r-.. ~,~,.J · \1--$1/ ~ .,,,/' ', ,r---------.:::,.:,'-, I /-/_'::_-_-_-:__-_-_-:__-_-:__-_-_-_-_-_-_-:__-:__-_-:__-_-_..::"-:::-~,~ '- ----·- -· -------f------ 1---- -----11 '------= D ·-------- ----· -··-------------·-- '---'---1-------~---·------- NI=~ ~e: f?¥..·. ~10 t\: ~e:'6 ~,~-r .. u.JND ---·- --·------ - = -- -- '"" '-·- -- - ... --/ ---T J>k • ::;:rw ., ; '); •· ,. ,t .~ '---- - f--,_ .-- ---- ·~------ ~----- -·---·- f------.- -· ·--------------------1 -------·•---------l ~--------_,. _____ _ C------------1 ---------l -----·---·-·-------··-··· -----·-------- - -· -·- ,- -·- ,______ ·- - ·- ~~~ I- '~~- --------...1----l /It,/ ,r I ', '. pt:·: •ff ', .. i .. )fl~ G I N . . . r· : . .. ' :. I ! f"5».T ?ftot2 N.;l E:- l ii-"2..1 f I j4T ~P"i R~-J 4'-·· "4"· l.!.o• l?i:;4 ~r-b' ' l, z-z 42:lc. ,:/ .. IO~c:..H- A€Nif0-c::~r Li¥,i;,I. !-"::,( f=P ~IT t" lleO \JE ID~c.4 BIZ-'~rb.•,r '-.111'<4 '11.. ·--------------------------------------------------- ' ' I',. = () -, '9 I'- = {) _, ~ ~ T -9 \) ~ ' -I' (.) -, ~ ' . I' ' 'l',otl ? ; ·~-' ~ ' -B~--t~---cr RH·-1 .tx.; 1/4 11=!.!o" 446:. <;,q.F+.- I --- . :, ; lcJllt} :!; ~ ;-i:r :· 0 D 563571 1: I •, ~i~(I· •', 'l' '"1 r't.1,, I 1~ ! ' ' ;! ' ;• . .:.~;! '.-t:: ·;1 ~ · ,r ii• ..... ; ~ '.·' r-/s ii ~~ I.) l'<j . ,, ~ (I ~ ~ Certificate of Survey for Jack Anderson of Lot 52, Auditor's Subdivision No. 203 Hennepin County, Minnesota A/81°44'/tf"w 14'1. OS I ' I I ">- '\J. ~ ~ ' - --- -- I \._ ) '¥ w \V !JI _,.,. ----971----- ---------------- "' ,,.---' / \ I I I I I I i I \ " ---" " yv ~ 'I/ V ...... ' \ \ I I I l \ \ \ \ I I ~ '} Ii) I I ~ ~ ~ ~ 'o "J ' C) ~ i ~ "I- ~ ' ~ "" ' ~ (I ~ ~ Legal Description l< \ I 7,j 6' \ Lot 52, Auditor's Subdivision \ \ \ '\ " \ No. 2Q3, Hennepin County, Minnesota. \ / 'rhis survey shows the location of an existing house, shed and well on the above described property, and topo- graphy as supplied from the City of Orono maps. It does not purport to ' ½j. show any other improvements or en- l \ croachments. \ l V -.• -i I \ I 50' f \ I .\ \ I I ' , I iron marker i', \ o: .--'lJ8--: Existii:ig contour frbm city maps ✓or 4/ff,( : /,5"0 .:f AOf'f , __ ..,..,,.. .......... ,,, ......... , __ ,__.,....,_, - I hereby certify that this survey w,1s prepared by me or under my direct super- vision, and that I am a duly regisll'red Civil Engineer ilnd Land Surwyor undL'r the laws of the Stille of Minnesotil. ~_/~---- Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota.License Number 12755 DATE /-25"-'lS SCALE / ,, = 4 0 " )0[3 NO. 95"-/5 ----------·-···. ··-------·. __ , FEB-22-1995 04:59 To: City of Orono Planning Commission from: Steve Gardiner, 3770 Bayside Rd Subject: Item #1998 Craig Wicklund variance of 3780 Bayside Date: 2-22-95 The following is for information only. I have no objection to ths variance application at 3780 Bayside Rd. Enclosed is a survey of our property at 3770 Bayside Rd. Please note the entrance to the 3780 property cresses our property. This does not concern me at this time but might be a future issue. P.01 I would like to request that construction trucks do not drive past the entrance to 3780 close to our house and back up into the propery. This would damage the gravel driveway we maintain. I would fike to be informed of the variances granted as we are considering remodeling our house also. · Ple;:;se call me at 476-0254 if you have any questions. Steve Gardiner 377~ Bayside d 1 -~ ~J.~ I I I I I :::: I ~ I z I -I ,.., .:r: < c; z ~ ~ X .. -:: , I < :..J > :.:.J r ,~ --' .. ,_ 0 - .,j ~ ..... 0 N ;-a--... , I .., ~ I (I .,_ (c) ~--1 I .... l;u ,q- N N ~ Q d' QI::, \I) C, -~ ~ I 'r.·-1;,z . , _,.'. :._"'.., N ✓-.-..•<r ,,, -r--;:, _,,. N • ~r ;1• n .-/'c.;, r-./C'i·.( -~ . 0--s,·, ·., ·-· ' ~ \: s f·· ,, ;. '· 50 3571 -\\ ... , ••..• ' :: -, ,>•.~" _;-,, \'!,• ' .~ .. ;: -::-;i, :;.:1 '.· ~:: --;r ► ;f~ ··-· ·:;.: ---;i ~.--/ s . ! I I '>- I"' ' (I;) ~ ' ---. ;1 ~t_., ~ "-t\j . ,_ ' ' () <::, ~ I 1\ \I,/ --- Certificate of Sur v e y for J ack And e r son of Lot 52 , Au di to r 's Su bd i vj;sion No . 203 Hennepi n Co u nty , Mirinesota ,1-./87 °4-4'/t:"w /4'l. OS '¥ \V \)I ---- ,,,--971 -- w IY 11/ ~ ~ i "' I I I\ ~ 0-: 0--: ~-----,. ~ ----~~ .--.. ----,------, I 1 1--_I ,---1 1 I Exr-sii ... _, h.:,11.,.e -r s 1-.eJ. Tc, !.e · r-e.-oved Exrs1,"'" Na'tv ..-al Tt-e t"S' ----~--)_ -_I ' --I ---I I f ~ I ,,---' i / \ I I I •, . I f fl 1 I 11 I 11 ' J ·,1 I j: (I ; ' 1 1 !, I l !I I II 1[ . \ l1 I . ' I I I I \ :: 1 11 i \ I "· J.J 8 \ ,---· .. •···· .... ,-,_ ---- I I I \ ---- i ! I 1 I \ \ \ -----"- " '-\ I 1 ' I l I I l I ,, I I I I, I I ,I I •I ii I l 0 r---, I I I \ ' 1 I -' \ \ ~ \ lo "-J I ' I I I ~ I . I I D \ \ Cl t, i "l:j. ~ ,4.i ' '} ~ ' ~ () ~ ~ I . -·I I I '-~-' ,--.. I .-• ,~ ' Ei..,e.,.,.,~,.1 q'-{D ..,_ tf L/2 T o ft> Lega l Descr i ption Lo t 52 , ~udito r's Subdivision No ~ 20 3 , He n nepin County , Minnesota . Th i s s u rvey shows the location of an ex i sting house , shed and well on the above described prop e rty , and topo - graphy as supp l ied from the City of Orono maps . It does not purport to show any other improvements or en - croachments . o: iron marker .--'118 --: Exi s tin g contour from city maps /or ,{,(.F,( = /,S"o .! Ac-tF.F ...._. __ ..___ ~n,, A11 Mfiti li MII M O Milii!P'R9iiJ>lmJ,'.!Zfflff'KFD711'EMZD'i'rr:m:r:r:t::JPli'RT anmone~➔ I hereby cert i fy th at t his survey 11·,1~ pre~1ilred by nw or umiL'r my direct supL'r· v i sio n , c1nd t h a t I c1 m c1 d ul y r eg i ~IL'rL•d Civil Engim'L'r ;ind J".,rnd Survl'y1 ll· u11dL'1· the l;iws of t he Stc1ll' of Minnl':;nl;i. ~~/ ~?f ~ Mark S . Gronbe rg Minncsota _Licehse Numbe?'12755 g ~ l),\TI: /-25'-9S SC,\1.1: / ,, :: 4 o / JOIJ NU . 9 S -/5 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1998 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: February 27, 1995 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Mr. and Mrs. Craig Wicklund 3030 Westwood Road Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES: John Anderson 2635 Deer Hill Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Jo Haislet Burnet Realty 1865 Wayzata Boulevard West Long Lake, MN 55356 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: 02/22/95 VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST The Planning Commission recommended approval of a lot area and lot width variance to allow construction of a new residence structure on the property and accepted the amendment of your original proposal.in which you sought approval of a street/front setback variance. The Planning Commission based their approval on the new residential construction meeting all required setbacks of the LR-lA zoning district. Applicants' next scheduled meeting is confirmed at the Orono City Council meeting of March 13, 1995. Please note the meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. As we discussed via the phone, you are planning to submit an amended proposal showing the new residence structure meeting the required setbacks. Staff asks that you submit the amended proposal no later than Monday, March 6, 1995, before Noon. Please contact Jeanne Mabusth (473-7357) if you have any further questions concerning the review of your application. lsv ORONO PLAI~NING COM1\1JSSION MEETING i\1INUTES FOR FEBRUARY 22, 1995 (#8) #1998 CRAIG \VICKLUND , 3780 BAYSIDE ROAD -VARIANCES -PUBLIC HEARING -9:35-10:03 P.~I. Mr. and Nfrs . Craig Wicklund and Jo Haislett were present for the application review. Mabusth explained that the applicant proposes to take down the existing structures and rebuild a new residence with an attached garage . The property consists of 1.6 acres in a 2 acre zone . The applicant seeks approval of a lot area, lot width and front setback variances . Hardships listed were the location of trees, w ell , elev ations and drainage issues . Mabusth reminded members that the well only needs to be located 3' from the principal structure. She asked if the well should be considered as a hardship noting it is in the middle of the building envelope . Wicklund commented that he was more concerned about existing trees and drainage than the well. He felt water falling on the south and west sides of the lot has to travel completely around the house. He added that internal water problems could result if the house were pushed further back from the front lot line. He noted a natural knoll on the lot that seems to be the natural building site which is w here the existing house is located. Nolan commented that drain tile could be an issue . He noted that with demolition of the existing home, regrading will be required and it would not make any difference to move the home. An appropriate grading plan could achieve the desired results . He did not see the well as a hardship . He thought the trees on the west would be lost eventually because the residence would still come under the tree drip line . Public comments were made by Christine and Gary Valerius, 3750 Bayside Road, neighbors to the east of the subject property. They wanted to be sure there were no trees removed between the two properties. They were also concerned about the driveway because the existing driveway has an easement over their property. A portion of the driveway encroaches the Steve Gardiner property at 3780 Bayside Road . Schroeder read a letter submitted by Steve Gardiner. Gardiner requested that construction trucks do not drive past the entrance to 3780 Bayside Road. Mabusth suggested the applicant discuss the existing and continued location of the drive with Mr. Gardiner. Neither Nolan or Rowlette objected to the lot width or lot area variances. They did not see the hardship for the front setback variance . Even by removing the shed, they felt the tree would be lost. Wicklund did not think the tree would be lost with the house in its present location. Wicklund stated he wanted the house located as proposed because it is the "spirit of the lot" to have the house positioned close to the existing location. They did not want to add any additional hardcover by rearranging the house plan and adding a driveway . He added that about 1/3 of the lot is wetland and 1/3 is wooded . Smith added that she also thought the house should be located back further from the front iot line . 10 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION :MEETING l\!11NUTES FOR FEBRUARY 22, 1995 Nolan commented that there was only about a 2' variation in elevations on the property. Appropriate grading and drainage plans would be important. Rowlette added that drainage runs down Landmark Drive. It was moved by Nolan, seconded by Rowlette, to deny Application #1998 on the basis that there is not sufficient hardship for the front setback variance. \Vicklund asked for clarification as to what his options would be. Schroeder responded that the motion could be amended, tabled or sent to Council as a denial and Council would act on it as they see fit. If it were tabled, revisions could be made to the application and then brought back before the Planning Commission at the April meeting. Mrs. Wicklund asked if the Planning Commission were also denying the lot area variance. Schroeder responded that they were not but had to consider the application in its entirety. Members would be in favor of the lot area and lot width variance portions. She asked then if they moved the proposed house back to the 50' setback if the application would be approved. Nolan responded he would be willing to amend his motion under those circumstances. He would not be willing to compromise on the amount of the 50' setback because he did not see a sufficient hardship. Haislett asked about the easement that had existed since 1911 and if it were possible to avoid using it. Mabusth responded that a driveway could be installed as their own and not use the curb cut of Gardiner. Wicklund requested that his application be amended to exclude the request for a front street setback vanance. Nolan withdrew his motion. It was moved by Nolan, seconded by Smith. to approve Application #1998 for Craig Wicklund at 3 780 Bayside Road for lot area and lot width variances for the construction of a new residence. Ayes 5, nays 0. PLANNING COM1\1ISSION COMMENTS (#9) REPORT BY PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE ATTENDING COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 1995 Members noted written report of Candace Rowlette. (#10) OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION There was no additional discussion. 11 ---. --- -------~-----·-··· -.-~---' ··-----·----.·-·-=--'--'--"---'-~-~,~.f=z~~;;~.;-~::::..:~-~~.;..~.:-.:.:::~,.. -22-1995 04:53 To: City of Orono Planning Commission From: Steve Gardiner, 3770 Bayside Rd Subject: Item #1998 Craig Wicklund variance of 3780 Bayside Date: 2-22-95 The following is for information only. I have no objection to the variance application at 3780 Bayside Rd. Enclosed is a survey of our property at 37i0 Bayside Rd. Please note the entrance to the 3780 property crosses our property. This does not concern me at this time but might be a future issue. P.01 I would like to request that construction trucks do not drive past the entrance ta 3780 close to our house and back up into the propery. This would damage the grave[ driveway we maintain. I would like to be informed of the variances granted as we are considering remodeling our house also. Please call me at 476-0254 if you have any questions. Steve Gardiner 377~ Bays~de O ( ;~/Jt.t-)t~ I I I I I ! :::; I ~ I ..,. I --I ,.., X < ,~ '-' z :.::i ::E: X --·--- , I < :...J > :.;.J r ,~ ~, .. ... 0 - . ' . . r ....... _., .. .,.. • • : ~ • ... , -'.• ... L • • ~-•---~•-• _...,__l -.. ••-•• . . . _· ... ., . ~,. .... ~ . ,·. -: ;-,,, ,• . ·-;::~.~:~:.:-:/,/~_.;-~ .. <_:_.-__ -.-:. -~--. . ... ~ .. -·.-.;:: ·_. -~: . ~ -. ..;. .. _~ .... _ -'.:.,• -·: .· - : ... :··-:-.-·.·~-:.-·~--:.:-<::.:-.::,,~~~----., \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ ... ';u .,j ,q- N ~ N r-~ 0 Cl N CS"" 0::1 «.I) i49'--., -i .., -;, I c., (I •.:, ,.. 'If' ,., '~ I I \,c:1 '-ti. = ---\~\ 4E..;: \~? \ ~ ~:~ '\_ ~\ ~o~ \\'·-~ ">.~ . -,~ \ "\~ EH ~"'' <' ~~--" :so)~ s '-.... .:>:, ., •• --:-. "-, ..... .. ..,, ..... · ' S'-ti .':"'"' ""'~ '-·\C oz. •.. , M 2~ -vf o -S r·....z ___ •:.J ___ : .. ':,. _ • ..!..!.::..::·•-=..;....:..• :....:..:9-=-==----------- CITY OF ORONO NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on Wednesday, February 22, 19.95 on the matter of reviewing the following land use applications: 1. #1992 James and Joan Jundt, the owners of the property located at 142'0 Brackells Point Road, seek approval of _a conditional use permit and variance to allow the restoration of a retaining wall located within the lakeshore protected area where no such structures or land alterations are allowed. In addition, they have applied for setback variances to allow either total reconstruction or major structural repairs to structures that do not meet the required setbacks of the lakeshore residential zoning district. • 2. #1993 Calvin C. Korth who resides at a residence located at 900 Dakota Avenue h;;i.s filed an appeal of the Zoning Administrator's interpretation of the code that would classify a pygmy goat as a domestic animal requiring a conditional use permit for maintaining the goat at the residential property. It is the applicant's position that the goal is a household pet and does not have special area needs nor requires a special shelter. · •· · ; · . , . 3. #1994 Robert Wolff, the owner of 4450 Forest Lake Landing, has· filed an amended variance application for a 5' addition to the lakeside of. the existing residence and an expansion of 1he existing lakeside decks that will require an average lakeshore setback variance and a hardcover variance within the _,,.,; J.--··-· 75-250' setback area. 4. #1996 Gregg Perl, the owner of the property located at 309 Weslakd Street, has filed an after-the-fact side setback variance for a structural improvement completed within ' a portion of the existing residence that doe , not meet the required 30' side setback. . I 5. #1997 Sally and Jonathan Lebedeff have filed a multiple variance application involving the property at 1101 Ferndale Road West that would propose the removal of the existing residence and the construction of a new residence within the approximate footprint of the original residence requiring lakeshore setback, side setbacks, average lakeshore setback and hardcover variances within both the lakeshore protected area and the 75-250' setback area. 6.·#1998 Craig Wicklund has filed a ·multiple. variance application involving the property located at 3780 Bayside Road that would propose the reconstruction of a new residence on the property requiring lotc:_area. lot width and fronVstreet setback variances. All persons wishing to be hear9-_will appear at this meeting. Written comments are solicited. Plans are available in tl1e City Offices for review, by appointment. '· City of Orono By: Planning Commission •·> Jeatln8:A. M8busth _" ?_c·•-<~<··:: - Building & Zoning Administrator ,£·.0 +;, {Published in The f.ak~r ahd'Pici;ee~ Feb. 20: 1995) . , \ . _;, ''.:;' . -,· _;'. , Affidavit of Publication State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin. Bill Holm, being duly sworn on oath, says that he is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER, Mound, Minnesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: A.) The newspaper has complied with all the requirements constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. .() \ -\ \ \.'.\. ' B.) The printed , '-'-:0\ .,_c U<> 9-x ""1,', L (l.-,__t\ \l':-L \\R r ~ which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week for \ successive weeks: It was first published Monday, the 2-t)~ day of ~<---<ov-....... c.. ...-'1 195._S and was thereafter printed and pubfished ever,; Monday, to and_ including Monday, the __ dayof ?'~ ; ~ Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to me on this ,19~. By: . KRISTI HOLM · NOTARY PUBLIC -MINNESOTA MY COMM. EXPIRES 1-31-2000 (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space: $11 .48 per inch. · (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter: $11 .48. (3) Rate actually charged for above matter: $6.47 per inch. Each additional successive week: $4.45. CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ss. CITY OF ORONO I, Jamie Bosma,of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1998, was mailed to the attached list of property owners. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 31st day of January, 1995. CITY OF ORONO NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on Wednesday, February 22, 1995 on the matter of reviewing the following land use applications: 1. #1992 James and Joann Jundt, the owners of the property located at 1420 Bracketts Point Road, seek approval of a conditional use permit and variance to allow the restoration of a retaining wall located within the lakeshore protected area where no such structures or land alterations are allowed. In addition, they have applied for setback variances to allow either total reconstruction or major structural repairs to structures that do not meet the required setbacks of the lakeshore residential zoning district. 2. #1993 Calvin C. Korth who resides at a residence located at 900 Dakota Avenue has filed an appeal of the Zoning Administrator's interpretation of the code that would classify a pygmy goat as a domestic animal requiring a conditional use permit for maintaining the goat at the residential property. It is the applicant's position that the goat is a household pet and does not have special area needs nor requires a special shelter. 3. #1994 Robert Wolff, the owner of 4450 Forest Lake Landing, has filed an amended variance application for a 5' addition to the lakeside of the existing residence and an expansion of the existing lakeside decks that will require an average lakeshore setback variance and a hardcover variance within the 75-250' setback area. 4. #1996 Gregg Perl, the owner of the property located at 309 Westlake Street, has filed an after-the-fact side setback variance for a strnctural improvement completed within a portion of the existing residence that does not meet the required 30' side setback. 5. #1997 Sally and Jonathan Lebedeff have filed a multiple variance application involving the property at 1101 Ferndale Road West that would propose the removal of the existing residence and the construction of a new residence within the approximate footprint of the original residence requiring lakeshore setback, side setbacks, average lakeshore setback and hardcover variances within both the lakeshore protected area and the 75-250' setback area. 6. #1998 Craig Wicklund has filed a multiple variance application involving the property located at 3780 Bayside Road that would propose the reconstruction of a new residence on the property requiring lot area, lot width and front/street setback variances. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this meeting. Written comments are solicited. Plans are available in the City Offices for review, by appointment. City of Orono By: Planning Commission ~a~,J~~ eanne A. Mab~ 4d. Building & Zoning Administrator To be published the week of February 6, 1995. CITY OF ORONO NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold public hearings tin the Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on Wednesday, February 22, 1995 on the matter of reviewing the following land use applications: · . 1. #1992 James and Joann Jundt, the owners of the property localed at 1420 Bracketts Point Road, seek approval of a conditional use permit and variance to allow the restoration of a retaining wall located within the lakeshore protected area where no such· structures or land alterations are a1lowed . In add iti on, they have appii ed for setback variances to allow either total reconstruction or major structural repairs to structures that' do not meet the required setbacks of the lakeshore residential zoning district. · . . ·~ -,· ., . . 2. #1993 Calvin C. Korth who resides at a residence localed at 900 Dakota Avenue has filed an appeal of the Zoning Adminislra!or's interpretation of the code that would classify a pygmy goat as a domestic animal requiring a conditional use permit for maintaining the goat at the residential property. II isJhe applicant's position that the goat is a household pet and does not have spe'cial area needs nor requires a special shelter. • · -· 3. #1994 Robert Wolff, the owner of 4450 Forest Lake Landing, has filed an amended variance application for a 5' addition to the lakeside of the existing residence and an expansion of the-existing lakeside docks that will require an -average lakeshore ~e!back variance and a hardcover vanance within the .................. ------..-... ... • -· ,e...,.,.. --• . . ' ... ~ ,.; . '. 75-250' setback area. -4 . #1996 Gregg Perl, the owrier of the property located at 309 _Westlake Street, has filed an after-the-fact side setback variance . for a structural improvemerit completed within a portion of the existing residence that does not meet the required 30' side setback. 5 . #1997 Sally and ·Jonathan Lebedeff have filed a multiple variance application involving the property at 11 O 1 Ferndale Road West that would propose the removal .of the existing residence and the construction of a new residence within the approximate footprint of the original residence requiring 1 lakeshore setback, side setbacks, average 1 !akeshore setback and hardcover variances ~ . hi th the lakeshore protected area and · the 250' setback area. , .• _ • ·· · I . #1998 Craig Wicklund has filed a , ultiple variance application involving the 1 property located a(3780 Bayside Road that , would propose the reconstruction of a new residence on the property requiring lot area, j lot width and fronVstreet setback variances. All persons wishing to · be heard .will appear at this meeting . Written comments are solicited . Plans are available in the City Offices for review , by appointment. .·. ..!..L:. -· City of Orono •. ,c By: Planning Commission - Jeanne A. Mabuslh " ·: : ; ·· .. s . , ,. ''- Building & Z~ni~g ~d~inisl~a_tor __ ., ~: ,;."' ·. • •P" .,.. • ---·•t--.. ,.~.-..-.,_,,i - (Published in ·The ~er and Pioneer Feb. 6, 1995) . . ..... :. 1 ~-;_,._.:__"" .. Affidavit of Publication State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin . Bill Holm, being duly sworn on oath, says that he is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER, Mound, Minnesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: A.) The newspaper has complied with all the requirements constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A .02, 331A .07, and other applicable laws, as amended. B.) The printed 0cr1 ti/I ~&J:rz~,i j which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week for / successive weeks : It was first published Monday, (o 1l ./J I ./ the_....__day of -dt" 1 /' 199:;f_, and was thereafter printed and Ii blished every Monday, to and including Monday, the, __ dayo6'~~-· 7 Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to me on this By : KRISTI HOLM NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA MY COMM. EXPIRES 1-31-2Xl0 a e n orma on blic (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space: $11.48 per inch. · (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above maner: $11 .48. (3) Rate actually charged for above maner: $6.47 per inch. · Each additional successive week: $4.45. l~ \. •' i I CITY of ORONO Municipal Offices Post Office Box 66 CrystalBa~Minnesob55323-0066 DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with M .S . 13 .04, Subd . 2 , "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are notified that: 1. ., 3. 4. 5 . The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. The information may be shared with other local , state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license . If your requested permit or license requrres Council action to -approve, some information may become public. You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 (see following page) to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. C.1:::0--, ~ Le_e_ w ~dd 0...VL j Middle Last Address City State Zip Phone TELEPHONE -4n}7357 • FAX -473--0510 Sec.13.04 RIGHTS OF SUBJECTS OF DATA Subdivision 1. Type of data. The rights of individual on whom the data is stored or to be stored shall be as set forth in this section. Subd. 2. Information required to be given individual. An individual asked to supply private or confidential data concerning himself shall be informed of: (a) the purpose and intended use of the requested data within the collecting state agency, political subdivision, or statewide system; (b) whether he may refuse or is legally required to supply the requested data; (c) any known consequence arising from his supplying or refusing to supply private or confidential data; and ( d) the identity of other persons or entities authorized by state or federal law to receive the data. This requirement shall not apply when an individual is asked to supply investigative data, pursuant to section 13.82, subdivision 5, to a law enforcement officer. The commissioner of revenue may place the notice required under this subdivision in the individual income tax or property tax refund instructions instead of on those forms. Subd. 3. Access to data by individual. Upon request to a responsible authority, an individual shall be informed whether he is the subject of stored data on individuals, and whether it is classified as public, private or confidential. Upon his further request, an individual who is the subject of stored private or public data on individuals shall be shown the data without any charge to him and, if he desires, shall be informed of the content and meaning of that data. After an individual has been shown the private data and informed of its meaning, the data need not be disclosed to him for six months thereafter unless a dispute or action pursuant to this section is pending or additional data on the individual has been collected or created. The responsible authority shall provide copies of the private or public data upon request by the individual subject of the data. The responsible authority may require the requesting person to pay the actual costs of making, certifying, and compiling the copies. The responsible authority shall comply immediately, if possible, with any request made pursuant to this subdivision, or within five days of the date of the request, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays, if immediate compliance is not possible. If he cannot comply with the request within that time, he shall so inform the individual, and may have an additional five days within which to comply with the request, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays. Subd. 4. Procedure when data is not accurate or complete. An individual may contest the accuracy or completeness of public or private data concerning himself. To exercise this right, an individual shall notify in writing the responsible authority describing the nature of the disagreement. The responsible authority shall within 30 days either: (a) correct the data found to be inaccurate or incomplete and attempt to notify past recipients of inaccurate or incomplete data, including recipients named by the individual; or (b) notify the individual that he believes the data to be correct. Data in dispute shall be disclosed only if the individual's statement of disagreement is included with the disclosed data. The determination of the responsible authority may be appealed pursuant to the provisions of the administrative procedure act relating to contested cases. 11 CITY of ORONO Municipal Offices Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066 HARDCOVER ORDJNANCE-In 1975, the Orono City Council adopted an ordinance limiting the percentage of lot area that can be covered with impervious surface ("hardcover") such as roofs, driveways, sidewalks, etc. on properties located within 1,000 feet of a lake. Studies have shown that sediments, oils, and debris carried into the lake from highly urbanized areas have a detrimental impact on the quality of water in the lake. The intent of Orono's ordinance is to ensure that rainfall run-off will be cleansed by filtering through grassed or vegetated yard areas before entering the lake. Hardcover Zones -Allowed Percentages: 0-75 0% 75-250' 25 % 250-500' 30% 500-1000' 35% Hardcover includes: -Roofs -Sidewalks -Paved or gravel driveways -Patios & decks (includes slatted decks) -Tops of retaining walls & rock walls -Decorative landscape areas underlain by plastic sheeting or fabric -Any other surf ace that does not allow direct absorption of rainfall into the ground JNSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET 1. Circle which setback zone (0-75', 75-250', etc.) the calculation is for. 2. For each item of hardcover within that zone, enter the length and width, and multiply to get square footage (s. f.). 3. Add up all the square footages to get total square footage of hardcover. 4. Divide by the total area of property within the zone and multiply by 100 to get percentage of hardcover in the zone. 5. If changes in hardcover are proposed, you should do a "before" worksheet and "after worksheet. If either results in percentages greater than those allowed, contact City staff before proceeding with your project planning! TELEPHONE -41£7357 • FAX -473--0510 r-C HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' 25-500' 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House 30 X /2.~ = ::,7~ S.F. Length Width ;:21 X 20 = t../X> S.F. X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage 52-0 X :zt, = -G?-0 S.F. C. Driveway I..Q X I 3o = /3,ex:J S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Other X = S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE ~L~ S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE '°~· 3C/0 S.F. B A %/5 B t?-5,s.~O X 100 = 'l,C0:2 % 7 PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House 3~ X ;2.~ = ,z.o{;_q__ S.F. Length Width :2--"-I X /3 = 3> l ;2 S.F. '8 X '51 = ~~ S.F. X = S.F. ~;22 2'-1 s;::Z 'if B. Garage ~ f qj ~.:22.. S.F. X = 21~ C. Driveway ~2~ X ~ "!:><./ = ;5?$""0 S.F. ;23, X L:2. = ;2. 7 G::, S.F. /0 ::L'if ::L~O D. Sidewalk 7 X 'I = :;:)..'i? S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Other X = S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE L/ /t/O S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ?,~, 3</-0 S.F. B A Lfl'-10 B C:,-5/_3~0 X 100 = 6,33 % I 13 P~('5on S w,lh \ I f'\ C__ro__~J L , Lu t c_ k \ LA\/t J R "'--" -<'._ "'-} w ,' c.. k \ u. "' d ,(''~· ~ t . ~ ... · ,. 1 -.. , 1 J [ ~/ ~ - i -- wi .., . '' ~-... fr 2 -~•,rw n~ Lot~ ( 14) ~ ! l ;::; ! (9) .::.:. l._:.i m .. 01 ·' I m..,n: l : ' '( •'~I &-4 .\ -d . I ( 10) ~ ••.,._· ~. ~-"r•• _.,-c-.,. ,, ~ ~ M ~ Z£ ~ ,.;J I ( 19) ~ ~ ~ ~ I • 711 ieo"4 ◄' 18'1 l~O. 05 1 ~ ~ fj; ~ ( 5) ~ ~ '': ~ I; .-'-. j__ I I:::' ..::::l .:c:f -AM j__..::::Jt--l,:cJIIH 2 (20) .. II . r' z ( 16) ~ I ~ ~ ~ 14 / 2 ll/ /1z 10 g '.:::: '.:::: : 1...:..1 L 1.J. ..::::l r·l AIJfJ 40 ( I) I I 1-:"'" i------1~~.,.-~ u ...-:, __ _