HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketCITY OF ORONO
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
473-7357
TO: Mr. and Mrs. Gerald Rowlette
3775 Bayside Road
Orono, MN 55356
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances
APPLICATION NO. #2063
NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
Date of Notice: March 28, 1996
COPIES:
, _____________________________ _
-----------
DATE OF MEETING: 03/25/96 VOTE: 3 FOR 0 AGAINST
-------------------------
COUNCIL ACTION -MOTION:
To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution previously mailed to you.
Please arrange to sign the 3 original resolution copies at the City Offices (Monday through
Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.). All persons with an interest in the property must sign the
resolutions.
Variance approval is limited to the extent shown on approved plan and as noted in the approval
resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to further review by the City. Variance approval
expires one year after date of approval. A building permit application for the replacement of the
lakeside deck must be submitted no later than March 25, 1997.
lsv
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
VARIANCES TO
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 (B) AND 2;
SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8; AND
SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (C & L)
FILE #2063
WHEREAS, Gerald R. and Candace E. Rowlette, husband and wife, (hereinafter
"the applicants") are owners of the property located at 3775 Bayside Road within the City of
Orono (hereinafter "City") and !egall.y described as follows:
Refer to Exhibit A attached, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property");
and
WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal
Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 (B) and 2; Section 10.55, Subdivision 8; and
Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C & L) to permit the reconstruction of a deck to the lake side
of the existing residence to be installed within the exact footprint of the existing deck located
58' from the shoreline where a 75' setback is required resulting in 423 s.f. of new hardcover
improvement where no hardcover is allowed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2063.
2. The property is located in the LR-lA, Single Family Lak:eshore Residential
Zoning District requiring 2 acres in area. The property consists of 38,960
s.f.
Page 1 of 7
3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on March 18, 1996,
and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following
unique findings and hardships:
A. The deck is deteriorating and cannot be used by applicants in its present
condition.
B. The deck will be replaced within the same footprint as the existing deck.
C. In 1976 the applicants received variance approval for the existing deck
that was to be located 2' closer to the lake than the deck that was
constructed.
D. Hardcover within the 0-75' setback area will remain at 4.04%.
E. A landscape area underlain with plastic located within the County right-
of-way shall be removed. This will result in the removal of
approximately 660 s.f. of hardcover.
F. In a 1988 variance application, applicants removed 146 s.f. of cement
patio within the 0-7 5' setback zone.
G. During heavy rainfalls the property receives maJor runoff from the
developed properties to the north.
4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar
to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that
granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely
serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a
demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial
property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and
intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
Page 2 of 7
5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments
by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety
and welfare of the community.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 (B) and 2; Section
10.55, Subdivision 8; and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C & L) to permit the construction
of a deck within the same footprint as the existing deck and grants a 17' or 22.6% lakeshore
setback variance and hardcover variance within the 0-75' setback area of 4.04%, subject to the
following conditions:
1. Applicants shall remove landscape area underlain with plastic at 660 s.f. in area
located within the County right-of-way as shown on Page 7 of this resolution.
2. Applicants are advised that if they plan to install a 1' high berm within the
County right-of-way that such improvement plans will require approval and a
permit from the Hennepin County Department of Transportation.
3. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the
applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a
building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance
will expire on that date (March 25, 1997).
4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a
misdemeanor.
Page 3 of 7
5. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms
of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and
assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of
the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 25th day of March, 1996.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk
Property Owner( s)
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 25th day of
March, 1996, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the
City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf
of the City.
Notary Public
Page 4 of 7
.,.,..-'!_..,
• : !
• .. ·
r ·-. ·---
L
r
:'!
"
J
/
: ....
/
':. ~ ·'O ,, ~
~ al ;;
o'
f
r ...
' ', J
I ./
' I .I) .
b I
(
I I
( .., ) •
b I
\ I
I
I
\
)
.] )
/ ,, / r'
/
I /
I" '
I
G
/
--
'·
... ·.:
,.' : :
: ' · .. · ....
' ' ·-·
'"<·\:,::-
(Jo 'oc;
/;>:-'
... ~-#. '
,, ,·
', ,·; · .....
:'._l
. ··: .. , ····:
"
"
I
\
'
\-'
" \ '
[l\ ., ~,
V\
11) l -\.
\)'
p
" I 'It
' ', ' ,\
·,
I
I
I ·-.:
i
'i
I
" '-~
I \
I
Page I
7 of 7
I
t
:·•··
······ ...
,• ..
'. .. :
,·r.
.' '•.'
.. :. ..
.·.• ',.
,• ..
·····•. ..... :· ..
\···:•. ' ,• ......
t : ,.
j---...
\,j .
N
"'
-... ,·
f'-·
.. J@..!le~Rwi:P~XL-J:~:J-~II.!-A111_~ _R11.1B::1-:!•~M-_,1;P;..1_~---~~-;a..-_ -==1..~•--Y .... I .... N .. Cl--...:;@;;:..:8:.:8::.:M:.:.:-· _:s.;;;PJl',E,,1;
1
A:;:.1NL.a-
··· ·1 .
......... ,
..l _.--
r--~ .... •--r
.:~..t "'
·.,
... ►
. .
I
t ,
' ,_
' .,_
'
' , .
. "! i -
: l
• t
-• ,> --·----·· • -, •
...
,, .
' ,t
. : . ·,.
1·)'&\0~ J
··•
I I
<~I
TT
ll
iJ
I I
t I
t t
II
If t)
11
. T "J.. \.,_
·.::---',.__;_ ..... -,___. . ._:,:__ ____ ~---
') ~i
t · '-1 r .
------~-
_:..
4
. . . . . ·• -.. -....
... ~----
. ,. ...... --~ ----
-I
:,~: ~. ',
. -~•--•,,
. .
I
. .
t:1
_______ _.....,
/.. \
' I I I •
I
Of,P,
•
l
I
i
i
\
I :; • i
!
i
i • i
l
'
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON MARCH 25, 1996
ZONING ADI\UNISTRA TOR'S REPORT
(*#3) #2063 GERALD AND CANDACE ROWLE1TE, 3775 BAYSIDE ROAD -
VARIANCES -RESOLUTION #3704
Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3704. Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0 .
(*#4) #2078 JENSEN HOMES, INC., 405 TONKA WA -PRELIMINARY
SUBDIVISION -RESOLUTION #3705
Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3705. Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0 .
(#5) #2107 ERWIN SMITH/JOHN O'SULLIVAN, 3340 SHORELINE DRIVE
A) VACATION OF PUBLIC ROAD -CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL
B) CONDmONAL USE PERMITS, VARIANCES, COMMERCIAL SITE
PLAN -RESOLUTION #3706 AS A.L'1ENDED
The applicants were in attendance, along with consultants, Rob Thompson and Jim Coen.
Mabusth reported that the comprehensive application involved the partial vacation of
Navarre Lane. Staff advised Council that the vacation would be extended to the western
boundary of the Olive Avenue intersection instead of limiting the vacation to the 33'
along the northwest side of applicant's property The City will ask for storm water
retention for future City needs within a retention area to be installed on church property
and vacated right of way by applicant.
Mabusth continued that the comprehensive application also involved a conditional use
permit for a 96'x45' Culver's restaurant . This chain restaurant is primarily been located in
Wisconsin with one in Iowa and one in Buffalo, :MN. The development would also
include a 50'x50' convenience store, a separate 90'x24' car wash, and second conditional
use pennit for a fuel station/gas canopy. A variance is required for the car wash, which
would be located 5' from the side lot line adjacent to a residential zone. The adjacent
residential property contains a 3 to 4 acre wetland, which serves as a density credit for
the Lafayette Ridge development. Ariother variance is for parking located 3' from
another residential lot line. The code would require 1 O' requiring a 7' variance.
Structural coverage variance of 5 .2% is also required as the 1-1/2 acre property is subject
to the structural coverage code. The front lot line at 100' would allow 100 s.f. of
signage. The signage plan is for 308 s.f. requiring a 208 s.f. variance.
3
CITY of ORONO
March 22 , 1996
Mr. and Mrs. Gerald Rowlette
3775 Bayside Road
Orono , Minnesota 55356
Dear Candace and Gerry:
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
Municipal Offices
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
The enclosed approval resolution will be presented for Council's review and action at their March
25 , 1996 meeting. Please review the findings and conditions of the resolution and contact staff prior
to the meeting if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
~C9lt,~
Jeanne A . Mabusth 4«
Building & Zoning Administrator
JAM/ch
Enc .
P.S. Please see that Daryl Carlson gets a copy of the staff memo and resolution.
Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed:
Name Jeanne A. Mabusth
Title Building & Zoning Administrator
DATE: March 21, 1996
ITEM NO.:
Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: #2063 Gerald and Candace Rowlette, 3775 Bayside Road -Variances -
Resolution
Zoning District: LR-lA
Lot area = 38,960 s.f.
Brief Review of Application
Applicants propose the reconstruction of a lake side deck that is deteriorating and needs to be
replaced. The deck will be replaced in the exact footprint of the original one located 58' from the
shoreline. The entire deck is located within the 0-75' setback area proposed at 423 s.f. The
original deck received variance approval in 1976.
At the March meeting of the Planning Commission applicants were asked to consider removal of
landscape areas underlain with plastic to offset excesses of hardcover in the 0-75' (4.04%) and
75-250' (31.1 % ) setback areas. 175 s.f. of landscape area underlain with plastic exists within the
0-75' and 838 s.f. exists in the 75-250' setback area, refer to Exhibit D-2.
Applicants advised the City that their property receives excessive runoff at greater velocities ever
since Landmark Drive was installed immediately north of their property. Major runoff drains
over the northwest corner of the property to the lake. Landscape area at the most western part
of the property is underlain with plastic and helps alleviate potential for erosion. Staff contacted
Dave Zetterstrom of the Hennepin County Department of Transportation to review the local
watershed and impact on existing facility. Zetterstrom found the normal runoff from snow melt
to be contained along north side but did add that during heavy rainfall the property would sustain
the runoff from Landmark Drive. He advised applicants they may consider installing a l' high
berm within the County right-of-way. He added that the County would not approve of any tree
plantings. Applicants were advised to contact the County directly to discuss any improvement
plans within the County right-of-way and to obtain the necessary permits.
Request for Council Action continued
page 2 of 2
March 21, 1996
Zoning File #2063
The applicants agreed to remove landscape area underlain with plastic to the northeast side of the
residence. Refer to Exhibit D-2, 660 s.f. of hardcover would be removed out of the County right-
of-way but has no impact on hardcover facts within the 75-250' setback area. The area is
maintained as applicants' yard and if plastic is removed, the area would be available for greater
absorption of runoff. The applicants also advised that the landscape area to the immediate west
of the house was not underlain with plastic. Staff has asked Gaffron to confirm his findings at the
time of his inspection of the landscape area. He has reconfirmed that he found plastic beneath the
landscape areas so hardcover remains as originally determined at 838 s.f. within the 75-250'
setback area.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the variance application as
proposed subject to the following conditions:
1. Applicants shall remove approximately 660 s.f. of plastic underliner within the
right-of-way as shown on Exhibit D-2.
2. If applicants propose installation of berm within County right-of-way applicants
must first obtain permit from County Department of Transportation.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
To either adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution.
Applicants have advised that they are not able to attend the Council meeting of March 25th but
have advised that their contractor Daryl Carlson will attend in their place.
ch
lvllNUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CO:tvllvilSSION
:MEETING HELD ON MARCH 18 , 1996
(#2 -#2121 Elaine Slechta -Continued)
Mabusth reported that the property consists of three parcels, two of which are Torrens
property. The certificate of titles have not been updated and do_ not reflect the 1912
vacation. Mabusth said there is no vehicle available to the City by which to certify actions
taken in 1912 by the Orono Town Board. Applicant has chosen to file a v acation petition
for Northern Avenue rather than pursue a lengthy and expensive legal action .
In 1982, the C ity reviewed a subdivision for a property owner to the west. The property
was abstract, and the vacated right of way was included in the legal description. The City
asked for 22' to 24' of right of way dedication for the travelled road bed of Northern
Avenue. Half of the road bed is located within the Railroad property. We will also ask
for a dedication of road right of way and for an additional 1 O' wide drainage and utility
easement adjacent to dedicated road. The boundaries of the designated wetland must be
located and confirmation by survey that 1/2 acre of dry land exists between wetland and
road within Tract B.
· Elaine Slechta brought to the Commissions' attention the remarks of the Engineer
regarding the drainage flowing to the northeast from the wetland to the north side of Togo
Road. A neighbor has voiced concern with drainage flowing through their property.
Mabusth said this matter may be further reviewed . She noted that the pond is functioning
as a retention pond . Slechta said she would be willing to enlarge the pond to control the
drainage flow to the east. The tract C parcel was said to be very wet and not usable in the
rear. Gustafson said the wetlands would still need to drain to the east but suggested a
s\-vale to define the drainage. Mabusth said this improv ement was not included as part of
the application and would have to be considered under a separate land use application .
There were no public comments.
Schroeder moved, Hawn seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2121 as
outlined with the Applicant and Staff to work together on a drainage improvement plan.
Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0 .
(#3) #2063 GERALD AND CANDACE ROWLETTE, 3775 BAYSIDE ROAD -
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING -RENOTIFICA TION OF PROPERTY
OWN.1!:RS 7:01-7:17 P.M .
The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted.
Applicant , Gerald Rowlette, was present. .
2
J\1.INUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CO.MMISSION
MEETING HELD ON MARCH 18, 1996
( #3 -#2063 Gerald and Candace Rowlette -Continued)
Mabusth reported that the application was tabled at the September, 1995, meeting to
discuss drainage problems with Staff. The applicants had reported that the construction of
Landmark Drive to the north has had a major impact on drainage on their property. The
request is for hardcover and setback variances to replace an existing deck that was built in
1976. The current lakeshore regulations adopted in 1975 governed the building of the
deck and applicants received variance approval. The applicants had reported that the
construction of Landmark Drive to the north has had a major affect on drainage on their
property.
Rowlette said the drainage flows correctly during minor rain falls, but when excess rain
occurs, the west side of their property is inundated with surface runoff Staff advised that
a County representative suggested constructing a 1' high berm in the County right-of-way.
Mabusth said a permit would be required from the County. Rowlette said the deck
replacement is an exact replacement in the existing envelope of 423 s.f and located 1 O' out
from the house. Rowlette said they have come up with a compromise for the excessive
hardcover with the elimination of220 s.f. of landscape underlayment to the east of the
driveway. Mabusth commented that this landscape area is within the County right-of-way
and is not calculated in the hardcover facts. Rowlette said the rock on the side of the
house, along with the sidewalk from the driveway, is necessary for drainage for the ground
gutter in order to keep runoff away from the house.
Smith asked what compromise could be made to effect hardcover reduction on the
property. Rowlette said he had no areas where hardcover could be eliminated as the
landscape areas were wood chipped only. He noted that I/3rd of the concrete patio was
removed in 1988, but the. remainder is needed for safety reasons to allow for an exit in
case of fire and to eliminate ground heave.
It was clarified that the landscape areas do not have any plastic underlayment but were
figured in the calculation as hardcover.
Schroeder inquired if the berm was to be installed in order to change the drainage patterns.
Rowlette said the purpose was for privacy. Mabusth added that it would redirect the
drainage also. Mabusth questioned why a berm would be installed just to the west side of
driveway when the drainage flows from east to west, and Rowlette said it was a matter of
preference. Mabusth said the berm could be located in the right of way but trees would
not be approved by County.
-Schroeder noted that the application was for reconstruction only of the deck and did not
affect the hardcover that exists on the property. Smith said the Commission would
normally look for areas for reduction but did not see any area to reduce since there was no
plastic underlayment under the landscape areas adjacent to house.
3
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CO:MMISSION
1\.IBETING HELD ON MARCH 18, 1996
(#3 -#2063 Gerald and Candace Rowlette -Continued)
Mabusth advised that she would have Mike Gaffron reconfinn his hardcover findings
before scheduling the application before the Council.
Smith moved, Schroeder seconded, to recommend approval for the deck replacement with
removal of the Russian olive area underlain with plastic and located within County right of
way. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(#4) #2107 ERWIN SMITH/JOHN O'SULLIVAN, 3340 SHORELINE DRIVE-
REQUEST BY APPLICANTS TO BE REFERRED BACK TO PLANNING
COMMISSION FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION -7:21-7:55 P.M.
A. VACATION OF PUBLIC STREET
B. CONDITIONAL USE PERl\ifITS, VARIANCES, COl\'IMERCIAL SITE
PLAN REVIEW
The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted.
The Applicants, John O'Sullivan and Mr. & Mrs. Erwin Smith, along with Consultants,
Rob Thompson and Jim Coen, were present.
Mabusth reported that the original application was presented at the February meeting of
the Planning Commission. The comments relating to the proposal were then discussed
with the Applicant, Staff, Engineer, and Consultants to include the internal traffic issues.
Changes were made in the proposal to answer the concerns brought up by the Commission
and others.
Mabusth continued that the application is for three variances. One variance is for a 30'
setback for the car wash. The neighbors in the Lafayette Ridge area support the proposal
in view of the wetland separation from their residences. The car wash location was
considered to reduce the effect of noise and lighting. Another setback variance is required
for parking area adjacent to residential lot line requiring a 1 O' setback. The parking is set
to be at 3' for a 7' variance. The third variance is for structural coverage excess over the
allowed 15% proposed at 20.2%. A fourth variance has been added for signage area.
With the footage of the front lot line, l 00 s.f of signage is allowed. The applicant is
asking for 308 s.f. of signage for a 208 s.f. variance.
4
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
March 11, 1996
SUBJECT: #2063 Gerald and Candace Rowlette, 3775 Bayside Road -Variance -Continuation
of Public Hearing
Status of Application
At applicants' request, the variance application was tabled by the Planning Commission at the
September 18, 1995. The application was to be tabled until applicants requested rescheduling before
the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission Action Notice of September 25, 1995 advised
of applicants concerns regarding drainage issues and problems dealing with their residential
property. John Gerhardson and Jeanne Mabusth met with the applicants to discuss these concerns.
Applicants advised that since the installation of Landmark Drive their property has received more
intense runoff at greater velocities from the properties to the north. They are concerned that if City
requires the r,~moval of the landscape areas with plastic underliners within their street yard that lower
level of their residence would be flooded. They noted observing heavy drainage collecting now at
the northwest corner of the residence where they had never observed drainage retention before. Staff
advised that they would be in contact with Hennepin County DOT to discuss the problems and to
determine what improvements could be done on either applicants' property or County right-of-way
to reduce flooding hazard.
Dave Zetterstrom of Hennepin County Department of Transportation has inspected the property and
advised on Monday, March 11th, that drainage was staying on the north side of the property and
draining either to the east or the west along the north side of Bayside. He noted that the center line
of the County Road was dry but also noted that in heavy rainfalls that some drainage could possibly
flow over the roadway onto applicants' property. He recommended that a 1' high berm could be
installed within the area of the County right-of-way as a means to direct runoff to the west and east
on the south side of County Road. Applicants may also consider installing a blacktop lip or curb
within the paved driveway.
Members are asked to review the enclosed packet prepared by staff for the September 18, 1995
meeting. Applicants' lake side deck has deteriorated and must be replaced. The deck will be
replaced within the same footprint as the existing deck. The original deck received variance
approval in 1976. In a 1988 variance review, applicants were required to remove approximately
6'x20' of grade level patio to the lake side of the residence in exchange for the City's granting
hardcover and street setback variance for a sunroom addition at the north side of the residence. This
removal has been completed.
Zoning File #2063
March 11, 1996
Page2
Applicants have not provided an addendum to application regarding their concern with being asked
to remove plastic underliners beneath landscape areas. Mr. and Mrs. Rowlette will relate their
concerns at your meeting.
In order to allow the replacement of the deck, Planning Commission members must address the need
to grant a lakeshore setback variance and hardcover variance within the 0-75' setback zone and to
determine what specific hardcover removals are to be requested, if any, of applicant as a condition
of this approval, refer to staff memo of September 7, 1995.
Options of Action
1. To approve deck replacement with hardcover removals -Planning Commission members to
specify.
2. To approve replacement with no hardcover removals.
3. To deny replacement of deck as proposed and recommend reductions in deck area proposed
at 423 s.f.
4. Other.
Any recommendation for approval must include notice to the applicants that if land alterations (1'
high bern) are proposed within the County right-of-way that permits must be first obtained from
Hennepin County Department of Transportation.
ch
To:
From:
Date:
Chair Steve Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator
September 7, 1995
Subject: #2063 Gerald and Candace Rowlette, 3775 Bayside Road -Variance -Public
Hearing
Zoning District: LR-lA, One Acre Single Family Lakeshore Residential, Two Acre (Sewered)
Application: Request for hardcover and setback variances to reconstruct existing deck within
0-7 5' setback zone
Pertinent Code Sections
1. Section 10.22, Subd. 1/Section 10.55, Subd. 8/Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (C) -Required
lakeshore setback = 7 5' .
2. Section 10.22, Subd. 2/Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L) -No hardcover allowed in 0-75'
setback zone.
List of Exhibits
A -Application
B -Plat Map
C -Property Owners' List
D -Survey
E -197 6 Deck Plans
F -Hardcover Calculations
G -Resolution #2492 (1988 Approval)
H -197 6 Approvals
Pertinent Facts
1. Existing deck is located 58' from the shoreline at its closest point.
2. Existing deck was constructed as part of an addition to the house in 1976 pursuant to
variance approval (see 1976 construction plan).
3. Deck was constructed at a 10' rather than 11' 9" depth shown on the plans.
4. The deck is deteriorating and needs to be replaced. Applicant proposes to replace the
deck in kind.
Zoning File #2063
September 7, 1995
Page 2
5. Hardcover in the 0-7 5' zone is 4. 0 % , comprised as follows:
House 434 s.f.
Deck 423 s.f.
Patio 170 s.f.
Rock beds with plastic 107 s.f.
Retaining wall 8 s. f.
1,142.s.f. (4.04%)
6. Hardcover in the 75-250' zone is 31.1 %, of which 7.8% is landscape beds with plastic
or fabric.
7. Applicants received a variance in 1988 to construct a small sunroom on the street side
of the house. That approval required removal of a 146 s.f. portion of the concrete patio
on the lakeside of the house. That portion was removed.
Discussion
The existing deck was constructed almost twenty years ago per previous City approvals,
and applicants propose to replace it in kind. It was noted during the 1988 variance approval that
applicants had never removed the 20' x 20' concrete slab at the walkout level, which they had
agreed to in 1976. As part of the 1988 variance, applicants were required to remove the
southerly one-third of that slab, but were allowed to keep the remaining 14' x 20' due to an ice
build up problem in that area (see documentation from 1988 and 1976 variances).
Per City policy as recently reiterated by the City Council, excessive hardcover contained
in plastic or fabric-lined landscape beds should not be considered in variance applications.
Council's intent is that applicants be required to remove such excesses as a matter of course.
Therefore, the rock and plastic in the 0-75' zone (adjacent to the west end of the house and in
a small part of the free-standing rock bed west of the house) should be removed. Although no
work is proposed in the 75-250' zone, arguably that rock and plastic should also be removed.
There may be justification to not remove the rock and plastic adjacent to the house where it
serves a drainage purpose, but the free-standing rock beds (portions of which are not included
in the calculations because they are in the right-of-way) could be made non-hardcover.
Issues for Consideration
1. Should additional portions of the concrete patio be removed?
2. What portion of the rock and plastic on the property should be removed?
Zoning File #2063
September 7, 1995
Page 3
3. Does Planning Commission have any concerns regarding in kind replacement of the
existing deck ("in kind" is intended to mean replacing it in its existing footprint and
configuration)?
4. Any other issues?
Options for Action
1. Approve deck replacement with certain hardcover removals (specify them).
2. Approve replacement with no hardcover removal conditions.
3. Table.
4. Deny.
5. Other.
lsv
CITY OF ORONO -VARIANCE APPLICATION
Initial Appiication Fee $200.00
($50.00 per each additional variance)
Renewal Variance Fee $100.00
(no change from original application)
Variance for non-conforming structures $200. 00
After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee)
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Site Address ,3 '7 7.5 D /9,!:j_.S I Ll E ;Qo ft 0
Property Identification Number (P .I.D.9' ------------------Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey.
Date ~r ~Acquired ~ / tf 7.t/ (month/year)
I (do (do no Q_,a lso own the adjacentpafc°els of land .
Presen ~ property: _)(_residential __ other (specify) _________ _
Zoning District: --------------------------
APPLICANT Phone (home) 1/75...,,I I tJ O
Name GE~Bl.D t/_ f!.&A2.[)A-C£2CJ w/eJTe.., Phone(work)-t-/-<-L...7"""_5'----'-/-'-/-0-0"----
Address: :3 7 7 5'"' b&fj,<;J/JEA}J City: (Qtf'oNo Zip: 5£.S~
OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone(home) --------Name ---------------Phone (work) ---------Address: _____________ City: ________ Zip: ___ _
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST £J EstimatedConstructionCost$ ~-: 0 0 0, 00
Describerequcstindetail: fle,-tJ l fl:Ce p Eck
(attach additional sheets if necessary)
VARIANCES REQUIRED
Lot Area Lot Width './ Hardcover
Setback: Front Side Rear
__ Lot Coverage
l / Average Lakeshore
__ Other (specify) ________________________ _
HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS
Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing
compliance with Zoning Code requirements: -----------------
(attach additional sheets if necessary)
7
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order
for vour application to be considered complete:
1. _ Completed Application Form
2. _ Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from
Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271).
3. _ Plat Map (obtained with property owners list).
4. _ Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover
calculations as required. In addition, provide one ( 1) copy 8 ½ " x 11 " for
reproduction.
5. _ Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade
are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8½" x 11" for reproduction.
6. _ Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8½" x 11 ").
7. _ List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the
property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s).
8. _ As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons
you wish notified of this application.
9. Additional items as may be requested by City staff.
The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your
variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning
Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment)
and/ or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the
information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge.
/:' /' ~ 1-dl
Applicant's Signature ({!tJ.,41&4.✓1r2 ~ /~.,fcu.Df{£QDate ______ _
OWNER'S SIGNATURE
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable
entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council
members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request.
Owner's Signature Date -----------------------
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission
Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month.
Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission
and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements
to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of
this change prior to the meeting.
8
II
RUN DATE 07/18/95
BATCH 503
PROP ADDR
O~lNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
PROP ADDR
OWNER NAME
. TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
PROP ADDR
OWNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
PROP ADDR
Ol'INER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
PROP ADDR
OWNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
-
-•
II
PROP ADDR
OWNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
38 05-117-23 21 0005
03780 BAYSIDE RD
DJ FARR HOMES INC
DJ FARR HOMES INC
11405 50TH PL N
PLYMOUTH MN 55442
38 05-117-23 23 0036
00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
LANDMARK DR HOMEOWNERS ASSOC
LANDMARK DR HOMEOWNERS ASSOC
C/0 LEE C HARREN
175 LANDMARK DR
LONG LAKE MN . 55356
38 05~117-23 24 0100
00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
S & C GARDINER
STEVE GARDINER ·
3770 BAYSIDE RD
LONG LAKE MN 55356
,38 05-117-23 24 0103
00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
S & C GARDINER
STEVE GARDINER
3 770 BAVSIDE RD
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 05-117-23 24 0112
00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND
HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND
38 05-117-23 24 0119
00038 ADDRESS PENDING
JOHN & MARV JANE BURGER
CHRISTINE & GARV VALERIUS
3750 BAYSIDE RD
LONG ·LAKE MN 55356
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 05-117-23 21 0020
03750 BAYSIDE RD
JOHN & MARY JANE BURGER
CHRISTINE & GARY VALERIUS
3750 BAYSIDE RD
LONG LAKE MN . 55356
38 05-117-23 23 0037
00255 LANDMARK DR
MARK L & KARENA S CASEY
MARK L & KARENA S CASEY
4320 ENCHANTED DR
MOUND MN 55364
38 05-117-23 24 0101
03770 BAYSIDE RD
S & C GARDINER
STEVE GARDINER
3770 BAYSIDE RD
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 05-117-23 24 0105
00038 , ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND
CITY OF ORONO
DRAINAGE & CONSERVATION
5-18-90 ST DEED #173561.
38 05-117-23 24 0115
00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND
CITY OF ORONO
PARK,
4/13/79 ST DEED 156753
TOTAL BATCH 503 00016
,,
REPORT NO. PI435401
PAGE 8
38 05-117~23 23 0035
00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
DIANE EVANS ET AL
MARK & CARENA CASEY
255 LANDMARK DR
ORONO MN 55356
38 05-117-23 24 0082
00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
DANIEL P CAHILL
MRS DANIEL CAHILL
224 N 5TH ST
D.ELAVAN WI 53115
38, 05-117-23 24 0102
00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
S & C GARDINER
STEVE GARDINER
3770 BAYSIDE RD
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 05..:111-23 24 0111
03775 BAYSIDE RD
G,R & CE ROWLETTE
GERALD L ROWLETTE
3775 BAYSIDE RD
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 05-117-23 24 0116
00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND
CITY OF ORONO
CONVEYED
2/8/82 ST DEED 161148
.. :IHi!',·.,,,,,-.r-..:~"'-"'~
~
....
0 z
,...,
N
,r' ~
~
N
: ( 9 )
✓ 29 1
3-4 7 , 14 N89 '35' A l "W
~ ~ i ~
I
m .22:
2
: 3
529.0 I
2
('38 )
I
(37) ~
~ ~
I /.9$
~ ij
c,, ~~
-~ ~
176 . 76
~
~ ~ ~
UJ
52 ...
( 5)
... 2 ... -... ~ ( 20)
0 z
I
65
✓ --····· ••••
~
'3
~
~
( 13) ....
N
• ;_,
:"' :8
II') •
0 0, .... o r<>
....
V,
.,
,._;
~ 2 iJ') i
( 12) ...
0 ....
"'
13 \
12 \
10
' c ..
15 : C
14 / •'
2
66
( 112)
---
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR
GERALD AND CANDACE ROWLETTE
IN OTTOVILLE ON LAKE MINNETONKA
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RE\.1510~ DATE
ESIG~ED BY
,/
,/ ,..,.
/
DE.C.CRJf'TIO'.\.
o ..
--;._
·-··~ --
I ht"T,+-. u"fl.lt~ 1:-..1: ::u-.. un,·, w.i-. !'<>"t',>1.-d k tn.· •or unJ.T ffl\ Jun.'1 "-V!"l'"f•
,,....,-: .Jn,j !n.i: J .r:r..i >'.11,11\ ,~,.:,-.h'f~-.::i ,._-rul CM,n.-r:-.in.! 1..r~ ..,u,..c-n'f un.:k,-
-·· Z? <:/.c:0 ~._ _
'..~,·~ -1 .... , ..,_. ·.1:,··-•:• 1.,,..,-.-\ . .,-,!---=°""~
r----------------------------.1..------------------
/
~
COFFIN & GRO
f...-•"!':.1!:110,: 1 ::~m!'t', ... L;,•.-! 5
➔!-,'1 J,1mar,1ck ..\\l~nul'" •
M24i3-I
/
/;
./·· ;,.:7
I
t
/!
r., 0 2C
. .:::..:
r ~ ~ ~ ;., ----i ~ ---, --,
Scale ,n reet
Contour
./
I
L£GAL DESCRlPTJON Of PREMJSE:S:
I
I
-
r---1 ___ _
I . --------
{A} Lots:., 6, i, 6. 13, !S, 16, 1S. 20, 21. 22. 2.1. -,nd 2l., OnovJlle on Lu:e Htnnelonk4,
EXCEPT that oart of s.,1d Lots 15, 16. 19, 20, 21, ,ind 22 lying S.outnerly of ii line drum 11t1r<!illel
•it.h and 30 fHt ttortnusterJy, measured it nght angles, fr-0111 a l 1ne hereinafter referred Lo
es "'Ltne B", said "Line B" being described as. follows.: Comll'lenc:1ng a~ the Northwest corner of
the soutnust Ouarur of the Northwest 01.1arter of Section 5, ToW'nsh1p 117 North, Range 23 wes.t
of tM Stn Principal Mer1C1un; thence South along the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the
llortnwest Ouarttr II d1st•nce of 234 feet; thence deflecting r>Qht 48 degrees a distance of
go ffet to the point of beQJnning of *Line B": thtrnce ciefhcting hft ~3 de9rees to thP. Soulherly
extension of the East line of uid Lot lS, and s.eid "'line B" there ending~
(B) That p11rt of Lake Ynw Avenue and Uk~ 5treet ,es Dedicated on the pl1t of Ottov1 I le on l.ilk.e
~innetonkt. described as fc!lovs: Cormencing .n the Hort~eHt corner of the ftorthwest Qt!a,1ei
of Section 5, lownsrnP 117 liiorth, Range 2; W!St of the 5th Principal MeriOtan: thence South AIOfl'J
tne i,Ht J1ne of sa1C1 f'lorthwest ou.e.rter a C11sunce of 1400.28 feet.; thence deflecting left
6~ oeorees 30 111nutl!'s a CIJsunce of 1~3.32 feet to the point of beginning of a line t'lereioafler
referf"ec: to es "Linet..•; thence defJect1n:; r19f'lt 180 degrees 11long s.aid •L1nt A .. i diSLaoce of
100 feet; tnenc, tlon9 a un9ent1.e.J curve 1.0 the left hiving a radius of SOC feet and cenlr41
angle of 22 oegre-es 30 •1nutes • distanet of 196.35 feet; thence lilesterly tangent to sale! cur11t:
• dJSt•nce of 802.5 feet; thence 1lon9 a tii1ngentiiJ curve to the Jett havtng I radius of 300 fe1~l
and• centr.el ,nglt-or 45 C1e9rt-es I! dlst,ar,ce of 235.6.? f~et; thence Sout'hwesterly tanvent lo
Jt;S! si1C1 curYe to a point on tl'le West l fr,e of the Southeast Ou.erter .of said Northwest Qudrler ol
Section 5. ,nd u1d "L1ne , .. the-re endin9, said e-nC11ng ootnt being tM poJnt of beginning()( the
property t>e1n9 C1escr1DeC!: tnenct-Northe,uterly alon~ s.e1C: "Line A" to itS"Jnler:.ectton wiltl the
horther-ly uu-n.s1on or tne wesarlr line cf lheTe-sa -Street in sud plat of Ottovlllt on Lale
Hinneton&.e; then" SoutnerJy along u.id hortherly ex:1.ens1on to the Southerly Jtne of SA!d Lake
y I ew AYenue; the.Oct southwester l r along sal d Souther I Y l I ne of La;;.e VJ ew Avenue to the £as t 11 ne
of uicl L•k.e Street; thence Soutn 1.long sa1d East line of Lake Street to its Intersection wtltl a
line dravn par!llel wttf'I fnd 30 feet HOM.hi::,aterly. 111eas.ured at right 1n9les,. froa a line lif!rtdn-
after referred to ,s "'line e·. saJd •Line B" be1n9 oescribed as follows:
Co•.11enc1ng It tht MorthW"est corner of s.,1d· Southe.e.st Ouarter,.-of the Hortf\west Quaner; Lhl!nce
South alon,; the west line of ~•td Southust Ouarter of the horthwest OuH•ter I distance of
23.C feet; thence Clefiecttno r19ht .118 cito;irees a dutance of 90 feet to thEi, potnl of bl!IJlrining
of u1C! •une e .. ; thence oeflecting left Sl oe9rees to said East line of lake Street
ane uic •une e• there ending. ·
tnenc, 1tortt1westerly 11lont; uJd par.tile! line to its intersection wHh sa,d West line of the
Southetst C,uarter of the Horthwest Ouarter, thence t.orth along said West llt.e to the point of
be91nn1n;. £XCEPi tntt Part of u1d ae>ove llescribed prope!'""ty lying Northerl~ of 6 line 33 feH
SoutnerJy of. aeasund u r19ht anole to and Di!nllel with, sat cf •une J.";
J:) 1!:~~n ~~ r; 1 ~ f H~~~t, ~o~!~;! sh O~! ;~ e ~f oin! :i~ t ~o~;~~~ ~ ~: ?u ~~ ;~ ~ i ~~. t ~; i ~~rtt:: ~~. ~~! ~j:'" o ~ f 4 s~~ ~; o'
ne,.re,nafter re,ferred to as ·une B. s.a1d •Lint-I." enc: line e" t>e1119 oe.scr ibed as followlo·
Nor~=:~~c O~trt~/rith=~~;n;~!ih c~'j~~; ~~e5 i~~t H~~~~e~~ t s~~~rl~~t~~a~~e O~~~i::~e ~i ir1!r~~~li~ l 11 ~
vest Ouart~!"' of the 111:orttiwest Ou,rter a d1a,nce.23, feet to the point of t..eglnning of Sllld
·une A.•: tne-nce deflect1n9 rJgnt 48 ~e-gree~ ., distance of 90 feet to A POJ.nt, ind Ul<I "l lne A" ~~;:g::::n:~ :::: r~!~\::!~gl;:es~~n~l~!eb;g 1;~;~: ~!d::~~ "Line e•; tn~nce deflectlng left
EXCEPT tht\t p1rt thereof J Ji n9 South.-est~rl r of J l 1 ne C1r1wn para I le I w ij th ind 30 feel
Nortbe1st~rly, •e•sur-t-d it r19ht •noles. fr-011 UtO' "Line B"". sut>Ject to an existing easement
for ro•d purpos.es..
•: denotes 1ron Dirker found
Bt-errngs Shown ere btSed upon •n usu•ed 01t.u.11.
Th1s survey intends to ShOIII" t.he boundaries ~,f th~ .above descr1Ded property. the loc4t1on of •r. eust1ng houst, anO' the locatJon of all ~.dst1n9 "nt?racoyer" th~reon. J·t Cloes not purport
to show any othPr-111pro•ements or encroa~hm('nt s.
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR
GERALD AND CANDACE ROWLETTE
IN -OTTOVILLE ON LAKE MINNETONKA
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
SCALE DATE
1",20' :l-14·95
SHEET :sil/ll.
JOllNO.
9S-6+
//
I
~--·; -
[,
5/ (l), ..____
=I CD'
'1
( /
'::\,
i
i
I
j
I / y/
,//
/
\
/
3o
/
/ -----
Deck,
/
·~ ...... ·
i,__ __ ___;
•• ~ . • ...... t .. • I
----,,,#---
/
/
/ ------ft:. -75' 5et.ca..c.k
/
-,
/
..
• >
/
/
/
..
, ·-..,.
/
/
:./ ..,,,,,., ,• ,!· : ___ ..... · --. ~:--, , : ~ ... _ .. ~ ,:' /
/
/
,.'f
L ,-•
I ,
('
)
iJ
.'\
_\
• ..
-~
• ,
......_ -, ,.,
, I
I I
''
=, •
z
D -~
=-Ill .,
Ill
% ..
IE a z
•
'1.. ! ~ 0~
'-~ av\ t C ~ t.11 ~ tr U1 " ;; ~!~ ~ (. .4 ~ l.." I.
\U 1i. \') ~ •..):. \~ " a !t ~~ :J: f It 1 1:~ 0~
r 1. \l r-
~ 'l\1--11
~~ 4V I.. \D ~ \ii t.
:!. ~-{k[ \a.I -:1'..~ ll,l \-.Jl '-1 '"L .
1--·u\ ~~ :1A J-8. ~,, of ...l~ ~ \'.f[ ~ C
1 ! '1~ Il 'i~ \:-• lt.1 \aJ
"'Ul Wu! NI..~ j ~ f-i ... ~ --i. -~ _jct W-r-.,,, . -,..
1. ,...4 \j'l J,.. bl (i:. \ll ~ \'j }. •
···-.:.-
,T -· l
\.·
\~ \I.
I L
u: ,-
V' .. El ,,,_,.,,._.._
-·· ,w,,'": C -• _, ,~
,.,.,,.4-•,-.... •
~
'I
. I i -,-... , ,
' ... -
-
1
,i ~. a()
t.LP
"1
t:~
~o J ' \ti(\ ":,'/I
I.\. '4 ·-.J ~
t==
..
\
:.:..iiiiii ·---··
==--•L::,;:-·"?:. ~:~·T··:·
.... .
l ,
' . . .
!
l · z
z • a.
' ·-~
I! , I
'f';, ,.,
~<ALD Row {.$,re .
SETBACK ZONE: (Cm~~VE@CULA'
1~ry~~~
EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE f~~~# "~:,,'""~)'~
A. House X =
\
!
4-34 S.F.
Length Width
X -· ( 12.3/ ). S.F.€'}(Ct.l-tD6f>
B. Garage
C Driveway
I I
• ,<11 • •• ... Iii ·' ., ,
D. Sidewalk
.. •'-. '.•• .. "· ..... ·'• .
E. Patio/Deck
F. Landscape ·
Underlain
By Plastic.
Or Fabric·
woo()
G. Otherw~·
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
' .. , ..... ,. ...
X
X
X
X
X
X
TOT AL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOT AL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A /14 2 + B
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE
· A.' House
Length
X
X
S-.4
···•·olck
/J4TIO
.42
X 100
Width
.. ·x . ---. -· ...... ·•· --------
B. Garage X
C. Driveway X
X
D. Sidewalk X
X
E. Patio/Deck X
X
F. Landscape X
Underlain X
By Plastic: X
Or Fabri~
0. Other lt
=·
= : S.F. ( 59 j ·:·· S.F·.!XC<.uP(D
=
i
______ S.F.
1 ,. " ., ... ,_ ~;
= ______ S.F.
______ S.F.
=
jl • : .
I/, _______ S.F.
= · ·s.r.
=
=-!
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=·
=
=
=
=
==
=
==
=
=
-· I ' ,, "·····-·,I
423"
170
---,-~=---S.F.
_ _.:,_..,_~!!::._--·S.F.
107 ---'-~L---S.F. __ ,;__ ___ s.r-.
______ S.F.
8 ---=----S.F.
1142 1 S.F.
z.a, =tso t "s.F,
4. () 4, 'i''o
S.F.
S.f.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
'S.F.
S.F.
S.P.
· S.F.,
S.F.
A
B
A
B TOT AL HARDCOVER lN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
·A·· .... ~...;.;..----+ .. B
_______ x~OO -! ;
% ...
'I .' ~
. , ... .,. -' ' 14 . .•. .,
qf~1,Q Rowt..E"Ti /E..
. HARDCOVER CALCUL1~WU1<.1\.~H~.E 1
(CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' ~ 25-500' SETBACK ZONE:
.............. " '' "
l;;X}STING HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A. House X
_ ...
Length Width
X -. j
1·-
X = I:
X =
,,, .. ,,, ···-. ~ ..... ··-·' ····· .. , -... ". ' •u•,••·• .,., .... ·1,11 " ' ', .. ""1'
B. Garage X = i,
I
C. Driveway X =
X = ' I
o. ··sidewalk ·x-..... =
X =
E. Patio/Deck X =
X =·!
F. landscape X =
Underlain X =
By Plaslic. X =
Or.Fabric•
c.o~c,. I
2..6 I
PAO 2.6 I
G. Other X = !,
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOT AL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
.A 3]27 D t_tl ~ 710 X 100 = lh
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A. House X =
Length W,idth
X = <, •.• •· .,
X =
:•X = ,l
B. Garage X =
C. Driveway X =
X =
D. Sidewalk X =
X =
E. Patio/Deck X ... ........... , '. ·=
X =
.F. Landscape X =
Underlain X =
By Plastic X =
Or fabri~ ! ........ i.-.,, . .,,_' ..... " ' -•• •of I I 1u•1••• 1\IIWl,II to·, ' ,, ......... ,,
G. Other lt
. ~ . .
TOTAL HARDCOVER lN ZONE
TOT AL PROPERTY AREA lN ZONE
A ------+ B
.. , ••• ' I,•
I -· ' ,,
X 100 ------
. 14
•• I
500-1000'
1703 S.F.
" .. s.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
610 ..
S.F.
S.F.
169 S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
838 S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
7 S.F.
3'327 S.F. A
to~ 710 .t. s.~. 13
31,06___%
S.F.
·\.
S.F.
S.F .
s·.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
•S.F.
'' ·· S.F.
S.F.
S.P.
'
, S.F. A
s.r-. B
%
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 249 2
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
A VARIANCE TO
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) AND
SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2
FILE 11314
WHEREAS, Gerald & Candace Rowlette (hereinafter "the applicants 11
)
are the owners of the property located at 3775 Bayside Road within the City
of Orono (hereinafter 11 City 11
) and legally described as follows:
Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance
to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the
construction of a sunroom addition to the existing residence, to be located
19' from the street lot line where a 50' street yard setback is normally
required, and a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow
additional structural hardcover on the property where a significant portion
of existing hardcover is in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone where no
hardcover is normally allowed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1314.
2. The property is located in the LR-lA Single Family Lakeshore
Residential Zoning District.
3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on August
15, 1988 and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon
the following findings:
A) The proposed sunroom will extend no closer to the street than
the wing walls and roof line of the existing house, but will
merely fill in an existing indentation in the house.
B) The area where the sun room wi 11 be constructed is a 11
hardcovered by decorative rock bed with plastic sheeting
underneath.
C) The proposed sunroom addition will not have any significant
effect on the character of the neighborhood nor will it encroach
upon any neighboring views of the lake.
Page 1 of 4
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. ___ 2_4_9_2 __ _
D) The applicants were granted a variance in 1976 to construct
major additions to the house, which were approved at that time
conditioned upon removal of a 20'x20' concrete patio on the lake-
shore side of the house. That patio has never been removed. The
applicants' hardship in needing that patio or a portion of it
relates to ice build-up and winter access to the house in
conjunction with his existing wooden deck. The existing concrete
slab is in three separate units, and the southerly portion can
easily be removed without causing damage to the remaining
portion. This wi 11 resu 1 t in a 14 6 s. f. reduction in hardcover
in the 0-75' zone.
E) Although the total hardcover on the property is less square
footage than would be allowed within the 75-250' zone, the fact
that a significant portion of that hardcover is in the 0-75' zone
is ample justification for reduction of 0-75' hardcover,
especially in this case where that hardcover was previously
required to be removed.
4. The City Council has considered this application including the
findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by
City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed
variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community.
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this
property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other
property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not
adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard
or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a
convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demon-
strable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial
property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the
spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the
City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono
City Council hereby grants a variance per Municipal Zoning Code Section
10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of a sunroom addition
located 19' from the street lot line where a 50' street yard setback is
normally required, and grants a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to
allow additional structural hardcover on the property when a significant
portion of the existing hardcover is in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone,
subject to the following conditions:
Page 2 of 4
1988.
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 2492
1. The applicants shall remove the southerly 7.5'xl9.5' portion of
the concrete patio in the 0-7 5' lakeshore setback zone, and no
building permit for the sunroom shall be issued until the concrete
patio section has been removed.
2. Hardcover on the property is allowed as follows (in 0-75' and 75-
250' zones):
Existing House=
Existing Attached Garage=
Existing Driveway=
North 2/3 of Existing Patio=
Existing Deck Not Over Patio=
1,509
552
552
263
Existing Walkways & Rock Beds Underlain by Plastic=
Sun Room Addition= (over existing hardcover)
329
615
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
TOTAL 3,820 s.f.
(per Exhibit B, attached)
The applicants are advised that the maximum allowable hardcover on the
property is 4,850 s.f., and that no additional hardcover will be
allowed in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone.
3. Authorities granted with this resolution run with the property not
with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by
application for a building permit within one year of the date of
Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (September
12, 1989).
4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and
conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the
zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted
herein, and shal 1 be punishable as a misdemean·or.
5. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree
to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their
heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this
resolution in the chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 12th day of September,
City Clerk
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 2492
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this JJ~ day of 0~ , 198J'
before me aotar~ Public w4::-narl(jfor said county, personally
appeared (; L ,c+ ~ 6 ,..,,&::u e ~ --known to me to be
the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as
his (their) free act and deed.
~k{o~~
NOTARY PUBLIC -
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
On this----,--,---,--~ day of--......,--,-------' 198, before me
a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared
known to me to be the
person(s) described in and who executed the foregoinginstrument,
and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his
(their) free act and deed.
NOTARY PUBLIC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
Page 4 of 4
/ ~\ /'
, \
/ /,
/,,, \
/ '\~\'
/ /./ '3)\
/ / ·~ /
/
l:_;~ 1""""1/ ., ,, o'
,,:,o ' '\i/ ,::':,:>:,/ J, . .-::;:l
.JI'-'
rJ~ i01
"
fitl
£7<.A/t 8. rr A {2-e~C)L-# _ 12
Certificate of Survey:
\
:\
' '
l
I
\,p.\L~ I hereby l!ertify that t'lis is n tnM and correct
rcnrcsenfa tion of r, SU!"'\'ev of the bouwl~rins of' (A)
Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 13, 15, lfi,' l'), 20, 21, 22, 23, and-24,
Ottoville on Lake MinnetonkH,
t~XCiP'i' tllnt ;iart c!' sdd Lots l'.i, 1~, 19, 20, 21, an,l 22 l;;in~
&-iuthorl~r of fl line dr11 1,,TJ parallel with 1,nd 30 fo"!t l,ortheasturly,
1r,cncured nt rip:ht 11n1:lor:, f::--01.1 n li.no herriinn:'ttJr 1·e.'.'c1-re,! to 1,:.
11 Line ·nn' sn,irl "LiW) r,n bein,· det<crihflc~ a~ ('ol ,m;::;: CO,Jf.f'llCinr u t the
liorth,,est corntir of the SoutLcnot quarter of thr~ r;ortbw;;;t r;uarter of Ser.-
tion 5, 1'0,.mshi;) 117 North, K<inr,e 23 ',,Jt!st of tho 5th :'rinciuul lforidian; thonce
Sc11th nlonr the \•Jest lin,:i of sni,! :3011thc11st q1.:arter of the l!orth,rn1>t fJ\l'lrter a
di :;tnnce o!' ?.34 feet; ~.h,mce deflectinr; riv,ht L.;3 der,rccs n dictancL" of' 90 fcot to
the point of borinnj nr of snid "Lj ne fl"; th,mcc do flee tini; loft 83 degrees to the South-
erly e.Ktonsion of the Rast Uno of said Lot 15, ;1nd snid "Lino R11 there ending;
(~) Thnt ;iart of Lake Vi,1w )\venue ;:inn Lake Street as dedic:1tAd on the plt]t of Cttovflle or, Lnke :!innotonim, described as
follo..;s: Corr.mencln[ at thA l'orU,er1:ot c0rner of the l'.ortr.\./':'st cnurtcr cf Sect.ion 5, T0\Jn::!1L) 117 1:orth, H,iflf/~ 23 iJest of
the 5t!i Princinal Heridi1rn; thence ~;outh nlonr the FA1.st lino of said !:ortlv,1ot:.t q,iarter a distc:nc« of 11,.n0.28 feet; tl1once
deflec:tinr, left 64 degrees 30 :ninut.P:' a dir:tanre of ll3.:2 fe"lt to th•1 %int cf l,er:inn~nt· of a line heroinrif'tor referrod to
us "Line A"; thence <lcfl~ctinr; rir;ht 18(' d•Jr-recs alonr: sn1d 11 Line h'' a di:0 t·s1:ce of 100 feet; ':.hcnrc ulonf n. bnr:,,ntbi
curve to the left having a rad:iu:.: of 5CO foet anc central angle of 22 degrP.E!S JO 1dnute::1 u dlst.:inco of 196.35 f•.:et; thence
'Westerly tanr:ent tc said curve a dist1,nce of 802. ~i fe,3t; thcnc,) alone n uinp;entinl curve to tllo loft h,win~ &. radius of
JOO feet and central uny;le of 45 defrN,::; a distance of 235.62 feet; thence Soutln.esterly tnnrer_ t t.o lnn t--said curve to a
point on the vJ,~st lin,g of tl-11~ So1Jth,-1ist <'uarter of sEdrl Northwest ~uartcr of S•3ction 5, and oaid "Line ;.u there ending,
said enciinr poi n:. bei nf the r,oinl of be F'.:5 nr:inf, of the pro;)erty bcini[ (iescri heel; thence Northt~as terl:·' nl0nr; snL; u i,in,~ A" ,
to its :intersection \Jith the 1-lcrtherly extension of tl:c, i-iesterly line of Ti:eresa Street in s11ir. plnt of Cttovillc: on Lake\
Minnctc,n'cu; thence Southerly nlonf' ~.,,id J:ortherl.v extension to the Scutherl:' lino of s[.id La'.rn View Avenue; thence South-
,.;esterly alonr s11id SoutLerly line of L11ke 'liow Avenue to the ::1~t1t line of s!dd Lake Street; thence South alcnv sairl 1-:ast
line of Luke Stn"et to its interscrticn \.Ii th a line drnwn pnrallel with and 30 feet Northeasterly, me:1sured at right angles,
from a line herein,d'ter referred to ns "Line B", snid "Lino D" lieinf; described 11s follows: ,
Co!1'.mcncinf at the Northwest f'('rm:r of s&iu Southe~1st mv1rkr of the t:ortt,\./est quarter; thence South along tho \~<:st line··.
of s<iid Southeast quarter of the liortln,1est quarter a di:;t.-tnce of 231, f'eet; thence deflcctinr right /,8 rlegrees a rlistance
of 90 foot to tho point of ber-:inninr, of said 11 i,ino B'1 ; Uicn<'r➔ deflecting left SJ deereef:I to :wi<l East lin0 of Lake
Street, and sni,i "Line 13 11 thGre ending,
t,h,mce North\Jesterly alon[ [:r:irl .)nrallel lino to :its intersectjon with suid \fost line cf th, South>?ast quarter of the North-
'West quarter; thence North alonf said 1./0st line to the point of' bee;irrning, Jt(Cr~!)T that part of saici abc,,·e-dcscrited property
lyine Northerly of a line 33 feet Southerly of, monsured at ri 6ht unr,les to nnd parallel with, sa:i.d "Line A";
(Q) That nart of the Northeast qunrter of the Southuest qunrtar of tho Tlorth\Jest quarter of Section 5, Township 117 North,
Range 23 ~,est of the 5th Princinnl Mod <1ian, lyinr Southeasterly of a line hereinafter referred to a::i 11 Line A11 and North-
easterly of a line hHreinafter referred to ns "Line 13 11 , SR id 0 Line A" and "Line n11 being described as follows:
. Commencing at tbe Northeast ccrn~r of said Northeast quarter of the Southwest qunrter of the Northwest quarter; thence
South along the East line of said t:ortheest quarter of the South\.lest quarter of the Northwest quarter a distnnce of 234 feet
to the point of beginning of said "Line A11 ; thence deflect:inp: ri{:ht 48 degrees a distance of 9·0 feet tc a point, and said
'ILine A 11 there ending, said point bein~ the point of beginning of said "Line B11 ; thence deflecting left 83 degrees to said
East line, and said 11 Line B11 there cmHne;, _ ·
EXCE?T that purt thereof lyinf Sout.nwesterly __ of_n line drawn parallel with and JO feet Northeasterly, measured at right
_____ a_n_1_~;~~;,_from said "Line B11 , subjoct to an existing eascment .. fc~· roarl purposes,
--.... ~-
, ,_ ,,,...... ~
·------------------·---·---. ·----------·--· ..
A
.j
-----··------------·· ---------·------~---
-'
\,1
~--\J\ -+--..... \
~
0 ~~~i 'o ~ :.::>
~ -?.~'b
<C
c!J
~~ j ,_
YI > -~
-
--· -------····· .... ------_...., ___ ...._._..~~'-\.~~' ..... ;:.i,
4
l
-"' ~ -
-· ·--··-·-· ----•··---... --~~ 1
---..
-
TO: Ii(, R. Ren~m # --11 0 ~ ~ D FroM: H. F. 1.-bhid-, ..a.
.
DATE: Mnrch ZS. 1976
SUBJECT: Richnrd Rowlette ·-3775 B~ide Road
Vnriimce -Lakeshore and St~t 5etba~
Mr. Rr-,lette recently-p11rch11.,;ed the old Beu 'Property at 3775 Bayside
Road. This is tJ-. p~rty with which previous probl~ of riwit-of
way encroachment wrt~ _iu!tt re~olw-d in 197S thru a rea~t of Lake
Street.
The location of the f:'Xi.~th1< dwellinR does not c:onfoffl to the st~t
setbaci: requin:inent of so ft. and·hardcover snd lakeshore setback require-
11mt ol ,:; ft. ~.fr. rt-,-wlette is now.TeqUeStinR variances f1"'0ffl this set•
bad req~irement for nn addition to this existinR struc:ttrre. The pf'O'PO!led
36' x 28' addition cons:i~ts of a din~ roan, second eatinR space and a
hJ'o car p~. The setb~c"<.s of the r,1'0t)Osed addition would be 66 ft.
ftffl the lakes'1ore and zn ft. frm the st~t nropertv line.
Therefore, the varimices requested would be 9 ft. fnn the lakeshore set-
back requirement imd 30 ft. fran the street setbacl: requirement and variance
fnn the 7S ft lakesho~ hnrdcover ~etbaclc of 378 sq. ft. for the existing
cmstruction and 400 sq. f't. for the t,roposed additicrt for a total of 778
sq. ft. of hardcover.
The existing structure includes a 20' x 20' ccrtcrete patio deck facirtR
the lalce!lhore. Mr. Rowlette hM ag-reed to remove this 400 sq. ft. of hard-
cover and replace smne with n l•T'Rf!r open redwood decJc if t.~f! setbaclc variancer.t
are appl'OWd.
The maxandn area of this proposed addition extendin~ into the 75 ft. lake-
shore setback wruld not exceed 200 sq. ft. This would result in* net de·
crease of hardcover of 200 sq. ft~
PLA.'t'UNr. mMTSSTCN ~U.Tr\!r. -Ar,ril 5, 1976
The Cormtissim recorrmendc<l to the Council ar,r,roval of' the lakeshore and street
setback req~t COl"lcition:11 urn:,n renoval or the 2n• x 20• cmcrete deck hein,t
-replaced b:r a nm-i,el'Vi.:,u~ tvr,e dec.K because the City would iain a 200 sq. ft.
dec:Teue in hardcover.
<nJNOL ~NG • April 12, 1976
1he Col.rtdl cmcurn-d with the Plamin,t r.onntssion • Approved
APPllCATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
AND QRTIFICA TE OF OCCUPANCY
VILLAGE OF ORONO, MINNESOTA
PERMIT FEE ?1 • ~ (7
STATE FEE 9, /?0
~1EE,,.4.:..;R......,;...• ll_t:1 ___ _
l~:::::=:=--------------------.--------------1 TOTAL FEE// /.Jf: (Jc} DIRECTIONS:
PER'Nr SPACES NUM9ERED I THRU 13 MUST BE FILLED IN
BEFORE PERMIT IS ISSUED (PIHH Print or T~) 3363 ZONING DISTRICT
FIRE ZONE 2. DATE
f--~.;,J.:;LL,;'.l.,._~~~-1-$,uJ;B;,___f_S,dl:.fj:~-----..l.._j~L-~~J~'..,_-----1 AGGREGATE FLOOR AREA
8. SIZE OF STRUCTURE 9. NO. OF STORIES
IH•i1'111 (Width) (Depth I
I
11. C.-iMPLETION DATE 12. PROPERTY DIMENSIONS
14. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION IS. PROPERTY AREA
SO. FT
18. REAR YARD
13. NO. FAMILIES (If Applicable)
16. LOST AREA PER FAMILY
SO. FT.
19. SIOE YARDS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND SIGNATURE:
The undel"Signttd herttby rttpresttnts upon all of the pttnaltiH of
law, for thtl purpoH of inducing the VILLAGE OF ORONO to tak•
thtl action henin ..-.quested, that all statem•nts henin an trw
and that all work her•in m.ntion•d will b• done in accordanc• with
thtl ordinanc• of the VILLAGE OF ORONO th.-Stat. of Minnttsota, 0 of.,. eu;1d;og Dop.,..mMI.
~~®00.b-:J-H4-:tf~~==--~
SICIUTUH C.
FLOOR AREA RATIO
MATERIAL FILE WITH
OFFSTREET PARKING
CONSTRUCTION
FOOTING _______ _
FRAMING--------
FINAL--------
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY ISSUED
DATE BY
CITY OF ORONO
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
473-7357
TO: Gerald and Candace Rowlette
3775 Bayside Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
ZONING FILE #2063
NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION
ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: September 25, 1995
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances
------------------------------------
DATE OF MEETING: 09/18/95 VOTE: 5 FOR O AGAINST
1 ABSTENTION
Planning Commission recommends the following:
Tabled for reasons noted below.
NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
Tabled at applicant's request. Please contact Mike Gaf:fron or John Gerhardson regarding the
drainage issues you mentioned, so we can set a time to discuss your concerns. This item will not be
scheduled on the Planning Commission agenda until you request it.
In all cases, the application must be continued within 12 months or the City will consider the
application as formally withdrawn.
lsv
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Phone (612)473-7357 Fax 473-0510
NOTICE
The Planning Commission will continue the public hearing on the matter of reviewing variance
application #2063, Gerald and Candace Rowlette, 3775 Bayside Road, on Monday, March 18,
1996 in the Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway. The original public hearing was
scheduled before the Planning Commission at their September 18, 1995 meeting and was tabled
at the request of the applicant.
All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this meeting. Written comments are solicited.
Plans are available in the City offices for review, by appointment.
City of Orono
By: Planning Commission
Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
VARIANCES TO
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 (B) AND 2;
SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8; AND
SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (C & L)
FILE #2063
WHEREAS, Gerald R. and Candace E. Rowlette, husband and wife, (hereinafter
"the applicants") are owners of the property located at 3775 Bayside Road within the City of
Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows:
Refer to Exhibit A attached, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property");
and
WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal
Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 (B) and 2; Section 10.55, Subdivision 8; and
Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C & L) to permit the reconstruction of a deck to the lake side
of the existing residence to be installed within the exact footprint of the existing deck located
58' from the shoreline where a 75' setback is required resulting in 423 s.f. of new hardcover
improvement where no hardcover is allowed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2063.
2. The property is located in the LR-lA, Single Family Lakeshore Residential
Zoning District requiring 2 acres in area. The property consists of 38,960
s.f.
Page 1 of 6
3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on March 18, 1996,
and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following
unique findings and hardships:
A. The deck is deteriorating and cannot be used by applicants in its present
condition.
B. The deck will be replaced within the same footprint as the existing deck.
C. In 1976 the applicants received variance approval for the existing deck
that was to be located 2' closer to the lake than the deck that was
constructed.
D. Hardcover within the 0-75' setback area will remain at 4.04%.
E. A landscape area underlain with plastic located within the County right-
of-way shall be removed. This will result in the removal of
approximately 660 s.f. of hardcover.
F. In a 1988 variance application, applicants removed 146 s.f. of cement
patio within the 0-75' setback zone.
G. During heavy rainfalls the property receives major runoff from the
developed properties to the north.
4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar
to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that
granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely
serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a
demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial
property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and
intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
Page 2 of 6
5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments
by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety
and welfare of the community.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 (B) and 2; Section
10.55, Subdivision 8; and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C & L) to permit the construction
of a deck within the same footprint as the existing deck and grants a 17' or 22.6% lakeshore
setback variance and hardcover variance within the 0-75' setback area of 4.04%, subject to the
following conditions:
1. Applicants shall remove landscape area underlain with plastic at 660 s.f. in area
located within the County right-of-way as shown on Page 7 of this resolution.
2. Applicants are advised that if they plan to install a 1' high berm within the
County right-of-way that such improvement plans will require approval and a
permit from the Hennepin County Department of Transportation.
3. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the
applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a
building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance
will expire on that date (March 25, 1997).
4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a
misdemeanor.
Page 3 of 6
5. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms
of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and
assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of
the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 25th day of March, 1996.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk
Property Owner( s)
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 25th day of
March, 1996, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the
City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf
of the City.
Notary Public
Page 4 of 6
. .
/. /,\ /·
, \
/ ·'\
/'' '\~'
• ':P \ / /
/ ··....:.
t' \ '. '-'-,PJ/ ,. •.
.. )01··· ··v · /_~:-..: .. j .. J, I
~-\ --
. ·····•
/'~) f'~
. ...ir-'
r-J~i"' . tAltl8/T A -{2,l':S:CX .... :tf _
\
1· I
I
: \ ···: .
: ' 1'
·•". ·, ··.·:~-
:: .... / ...
... : ~
\
\,r,.\1.(-
Certi ficn to of Survoy:
I horoliy nortify thn t thiu is c1 iru,1 und co1Toct
rcpronenlt, tlon of :l :rnrvoy oJ' t.ho holm<hri<i:1 or (!)
Lotn 5, 6, 7 1 8, 13, 15, lf-., l'), 20, ?.l, 22, 2J, 11nd ?.4,
Ottovi.lle on Lako 1-'.innctonku,
l~XCt:l''i' tllnt ;iart c!' :::i>dd Lotn l'.i, lE, 19, 20, 2l, un,1 22 l:;int.:
So11t.horl:• of n line cl1·111.-r. purnllcl \tiih ,,nd JO fuut 1:orthcauturly,
1:.on:,11rcd nt riv.ht. HOf;lo::, f':-01.1 r. li.nii her1dn11:'tur rn;\n-rod to 11:.
"Lino ·n 11
1 ,;nld "Lino r~11 l:i<3in,· r:a11crH1nd :H, foli.m:t.i: C0,:'Jf.f•n~ln1? ut. tho
liort\w(ist cornnr of tho Sc,11thont1 t quarter of tho t:ortl;110:J t quartor at' ~iuc-
tion 5, ro,.muhb 11'7 t?orth, lilinr~o 2) \·lust of tr:1) 5th :1rincinul 1-\ur!cticrn; thonca
Smith nlonr the \•Jost linu of snit! ::lo11Uw1u;t ql!n!'tor of tho l!orthwrnt '!ll'll'tor n
cl1 :itnnce of ?.J4 foetj Lh•mco dnflfictinr. riel-,t L.B dor,roca n dir:ttrncl1 of 90 foot to
the point of horinninr. of srJid "L:lno D"; th;rncu dofloctin1: loft BJ dogroea to tho South-
erly e.>-.-ton:.;ion of tho Rust l:lno of said Lot 15, nnd ::mid 11 Linll r.11 thcro ending;
(!l) TI,nt ;,art of Lnke Vi,w Avcm10 ,rn<l Luke Street us dodicnt1-1d on tho µl11t of Cttov:flle on Lnko :\innotonk:1, <lesr.rHied as
follows: Corr.menclng at thi=i rort.he:1.~t corner of the 1:orthr.st. q1iurtcr cf Sect.ion 5, Te:\Jn=hL) 117 1:orth, nanr;ri :?J \Jost of
the 5th Principal Hcriditrn; thence ~iouth nlonr,: the fost lino of ua1d ?:orth\-10:ot quarter n distuncr. of 11,,no.2e foet.; thence
def'lectine left 64 degrees JO :ninut.fl:1 u ciir.tnn"e of ll3.:2 fe"lt to th•.! !)()int cf l,er:inn~nr of a line huroinaf'tor roforrod to
ns "Lino A"; thence <loflcct:lnr, rir;ht 1C0. do;rrei:s alonr: cnld "Linn h" 11 di:,t-,1,r.e of 100 feet; thcnl'c ulonf n t!lnf'.llnti'll
curve to thl'l left hriving 11 rndiu:..: of 5C0 foat nn~ central onr:lo of 22 degrees JO ll'Jnutc:J u dist!lneo of 196.35 f•lCLi thence
\.Jestorly tanr:ent to so.id curve a disti,nce of 802. S feet; theneQ nlon[' n tanp;entlnl curvo to tho loft huvin,?' a radius of
JOO feet 11nd contml anfle of 45 def.re,,a A distunr.e of 2J5.fi2 feet; thonce SoutllweHtorly tuni:er.t to l.n1Jt-::.uid curve to a
point on the i/1}:::t lin'9 of th,3 South•-nHt r.uarter of :mid Northwest l!llartcr of S•3ction 5, and oa:id "Lino A" thcro endinr.,
said enciinr j)oin:. beinf the r,oint. of ber,:lm:inr: of the propc:rty bcinif cioscrihccl; thence Nortluir.u;;tP-rl;:1 nlonr: sni:1 11 i,in,~ A" .,
to its :intcr6eclion \Jit.h the llcrtherly oxtonsinn of ih, \~l'lsterly line of Ti:ercrn Sirect in s11iri pl11t of Cttovillt: on Luke\
1-linnctc-nku; thence :::outhcrly alonp; ~.,id l!ortllcrly extension to tho Scutherl:' Uno of Be.id Lit~rn Vieii Aven\JOj thence South-
westerly alonr ::inid Soutt.erly lino of.' Ln\ce Vio\/ }I.venue to the i:1!tlt line cf sidd LHka SLrcet; thonco South alc.nµ soi<l l~ast
line of Lake Str0.et to its inter:rncticn \/ith a line drmm p11rallel with and JO feet Northonsterly, mr:1nsured at right on~les,
from n l.tnu ho·c11ln:d'tcr reforrod to ns "Line D11 , 1.1nict 11 Lino D11 bein1-; described ns f'oUo"'::i:
Co1rJ11Cndnt'. 11 l Llw Norlh\-'ost cornur of auit.1 &iuthoaut q11nrto1· or tho tiortli\Jf1G t qunrtor; thtmco South 11long tho
of snid Southeust qunrter of tho 1:ortln,,est qunrter o di:it•rnce of 231, t'eet; thence doflcctinr right/,?, riegreeo
of 90 foot to tho point of' ho1-Jnning of snid "Lino B"; U,on<'ri clofli:rnting left 8J decrcw1:1 to :mici Eai.;t linu of
Street, nnd sni,i 11 1.inu B11 th:lre ending,
W<l st lin13• ·.
n riiatanca
Lake
t,hflnco tJnrthwe::iterly alon[ ::;r.irt .)nrallel lino to :its inter:wctJon \.lith :mid \Jti::;t line cr·tLo South•}ast qunr-u:r of the North-
west quarter; thence North alonff :.;nid \Jout line to tho point of bec;innlng, UCi-~PT that part of snid Rbcwe-doocritori property
lyine; tlortherly of o line 33 feet Southerly of, rocnsured at richt onr,les to nncl parnllol Yith, sold "Line A11 ;
(Q) That nart of tho Northeast qunrtor of the South1,1e3t quartor of tho Jlorth1,ost quarter of Section 5, Township 117 Uorth,
Range 2.3 ~!ast of the 5th Princi?,,l l-\crj rliun, lyinr. :.kmthea::;terly of a lino horciri1..1ftor referred to o.o "Lino A" and t!orthr
eusterly of a line horeinuftor reforred to ns 11 Ll.ne !3'1 , SA id "Lina A" and 11 Line n11 being descd lJcd us follows i
. CommoncinL( ol tho Northea:.t c0rner of suid llorthenat quurtor of the South\.lest qll/lrter of tha ?lorthweat quurtor; thence
South o.lon~ the Eust lina of said t=ortheast quarter of the Southuest qunrtor of the Northweot· _qunrtor n diatnnci: of 234 fe~t
to tho point of beginning of said "Lino A11 ; thence dflflcr:t:lnp: right L.8 dop,rees a distance of 90 feet too point, and aaid
11 Line A" there anding, said point bein~ the point or beginninr; of suid 11 Line B11 ; thence deflocting loft 8J dogrees to said
&lat Uno, and said 11 Line B" there cnr.i.ne;, . ·
.El9Ei>T that purt thereof lyin1t Sout,n\leater]s:_of_o line druvn purallol \11th and JO feet Northcaatorly, moasured at right
____ n_n_gleo·;, from said 11 L~~o B", subjoct to on existinr, easomont. fc· r9ad purposeo,
r---
4-l
0
I.D
et,
ro
P-4
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CO.MJvflSSION
l\1EETING HELD ON SEPTEIVIBER 18, 1995
(#8 -#2062 Ted Rozeboom/Josephine Knudson -Continued)
Commissioners noted they would not ,vant to see any outward evidence of a business or
any parking.
Vote: Ayes 3, Hawn, Smith, Rowlette; Nays 3, Peterson, Schroeder, Lindquist .. Motion
fails.
The applicant asked if it would work if his wife ovmed the property. Peterson said that
would set a bad precedent. Smith said specific ground rules need to be laid.
Rowlette moved, Smith seconded, to table Application #2062 to allow applicant time to
consider other possible solutions. Ayes 6, Nays 0.
(#9) #2063 GERALD AND CANDACE ROWLETTE, 3775 BAYSIDE ROAD -
VARIANCES -PUBLIC HEARING
Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to table Application #2063 at the request of the
applicants. Ayes 6, Nays 0 .
(#10) #2066 ROBERT AND IRIS WA.ADE, 1487 SHORELINE DRIVE -
VARIANCES-PUBLIC HEARING 10:33-10:59 P.M.
The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted.
The applicants were present.
Gaffron reported that the application is for a number of variances for a 3rd-level addition
to a lakeshore property located off of Shoreline Drive in a 2-acre zoning district . The
house currently exists at 21' from the shoreline with the deck l 6 1 from the shoreline. A
bituminous walkway is located under the deck near the lake. There is an 8.3' side setback
where 30' is required. The average lakeshore setback currently encroaches 13' for the
house and 24' for the deck and would remain the same under the proposal . Hardcover in
the 0-75' exists at 28.1 % for structural and 11.1 % for non-structural for a total of 39.2%.
The lot coverage by structure is proposed at 13 .8% meeting the 15% allowable.
There would not be much of a change in the footprint of the house. The proposal is for
what is by definition a three-story home by eliminating the existing flat roof and adding
another level over the main level and basement, which is considered a story with its 18
courses. The street side of the residence is a walk-in with the proposed story to be
located above that. The floor plan shows a car port on the main level, open with a roof,
and proposed with a second story . The pitch of the roof would be 10:12. The height of
the residence meets the ordinance at 28-1/2' as normally defined; but the house is 46' in
total ground-to-peak height from the lakeside view.
20
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Phone (612)473-7357 Fax 473-0510
NOTICE
The Planning Commission will continue the public hearing on the matter of reviewing variance
application #2063 , Gerald and Candace Rowlette, 3775 Bayside Road, on Monday, March 18,
1996 in the Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway. The original public hearing was
scheduled before the Planning Commission at their September 18, 1995 meeting and was tabled
at the request of the applicant.
All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this meeting. Written comments are solicited.
Plans are available in the City offices for review, by appointment.
City of Orono
By: Planning Commission
. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, I'YfN 55323
Phone (612)473-7357 Fax 473-0510
NOTICE
The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley
Parkway commencing at 7 :00 p.m. on Monday, September 18, 1995, on the matter of reviewing
the following land use applications:
1. #2059 Minnehaha Creek Watershed Disujct has made application for a conditional use
permit and variance for the construction of a 2.5 acre storm.water wet detention pond on
propeny located at 1485 Sixth Avenue North (PIN #26-118-23 33 0029) involving the
removal of approximately 25,000 cubic yards of fill within and adjacent to a protected
tributary.
2. #2060 Tim Feyo and Karen Fuller-Feyo, the owners of the property located at 4055 Elm
Street , have made application for renewal of the lot width variance granted in September ,
1994 to allow construction of a single family residence on the property .
3. #2061 Arne Wasberg of 3135 North Shore Drive has made application for renewal of 0-
75' hardcover and lakeshore setback variances approved in September, 1994 for the
construction of additions to the existing residence .
4. #2062 Ted Rozeboom of 2967 Casco Point Road (the applicant) and Josephine Knudson ,
owner of 2965 Casco Point Road, have made application for variances to the zoning
standards for conducting a home occupation. The applicant requests approval of a home
occupation operated by the applicant on a property and within a principal structure in
which he does not reside, and for which the entrance to said home occupation is not
srnined from within said principal structure.
5. #2063 Gerald and Candace Rowlette of 3775 Bayside Road have made application for
hardcover and lakeshore setback variances for replacement of an existing deck in the 0-
7 5' lakeshore setback zone.
6. #2066 Robert and Iris Waade of 1487 Shoreline Drive have made application for side
setback , lakeshore setback, average lakeshore setback and hardcover variances to allow
the construction of a second story addition and roof line revisions to the existing
residence.
7. #2067 Bruce and Terry Clark of 625 Old Long Lake Road have made application for
a side setback variance to allow construction of an attached garage addition.
8. #2068 Par and Kathy Smieja of 4040 Watertown Road have made application for from
and rear setback variances to allow construction of an addition to the existing residence.
PLAL'lNING C01\1iv1ISSION NOTICE FOR rvIEETING OF SEPTEMBER 18, 1995
9. #2069 Cindy and Steve Harris of 3850 Watertown Road have made application for a
variance to allow construction of a swimming pool located nearer the front lot line than
the principal residence structure.
10. #2071 James and Joann Jundt of 1400 Brackens Point Road have made an application
to amend Resolution No. 3539, requesting variances and conditional use permit for land
alterations and hardcover within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone.
11. #2072 Graydon K. Newman, Jr. of 1655 Bohns Point Road has made application for
lakeshore setback variances, hardcover variance and land alteration conditional use permit
for proposed deck walkways and sand fill including boulder retaining wall alterations,
within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone.
12. #2073 William and Susan Dunkley of 2709 Walters Port Lane have made application
for lakeshore setback and hardcover variances and a land alteration conditional use permit
for retaining wall, sidewalk and driveway reconstruction, and construction of three-
season porch and entryway additions, all within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone.
All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this meeting. Written comments are solicited.
Plans are available in the City offices for review, by appointment.
City of Orono
By: Planning Commission
t Planning & Zoning Administrator
To be published the week of September 4, 1995.
~:
Affidavit of Publication
State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin.
Bill Holm, being duly sworn on oath, says that he is
an authorized agent and employee of the publisher
of the newspaper known as THE LAKER, Mound,
Minnesota, and has full knowledge of the facts
CITY OF ORONO
which are stated below:
side setback, lakeshore setback, average ·
lakeshore setback and hardcover variances , ·2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 ·
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Phone (612) 473-7357 Fax 473-0510
to allow the construction of a second story A ) Th h · ·
addition and roof line rev ision to the existing • e newspaper as complied with all the
NOTICE res i1;.nc~067 .sruc~·and Terry ~lark: of ~25 requirements constituting qualifications as a
Old Long Lake Road have made application qualified newspaper as provided by Minnesota
The _ Planning Commission will hold for a side setback variance to allow '
public hearings in the Council Chambers at construction of an attached garage addition. Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07, and other applicable
2780 Kelley Parkway commencing at 7:00 -· 8. #2068 Pat and Kathy Smieja of 4040
p.m . on Monday, September 18, 1995, on the . Watertown Road have made application for laws, as amended.
matter of rev iewing the follow ing land use .front a11d_ rear ._setback variances to allow /4 . ..,
applications : • construction or an, addition to the existing /; f ~
1. #2059 Minnehaha Cree!< Watershed • residence -· ·· · · • '/J 11A J! '1 ,t ,JI/) 'i1 A}
District has made application for a cond itional 9. #2069 Cindy and Steve Harris of B.) The printed _{6 wrv J}Jlii1-w~J.,t
use permit an·d variance for the construction 3850 Watertown Road have made application f
or a 2.5 acre stormwater wet detention pond for a variance to allow construction of a , '
_•on property lo~ated at 1485 Sixth _Avenue swimming pool located nearer the front lot
North (PIN #26-118·2~ 33 0029) involving the -line than the principal residence structure. ~-----------------------
removal of approximately 25.000. cubic yards .... 10. #2071 Ja.mes and Joann-Jundt of ,which is attached was cut from the columns of said
of fill . within and · ad j acent to a protected 1400 Bracketts Point Road have made an •
tributary. . _ · _ applicat ion to amend -Resolution _ No. 3539, newspaper, and w/s printed and published once
2. #2060 Tim Feyo and Karen Fuller-. _ requesting variances and cond1t1onal use .
Feyo, the owners ol the property located at . permit for land alterations and hardcover each week for ----successive weeks:
4055 Elm Street , have made application for within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone. '
renewal of the lot width variance granted in · 11. ·lt2072 Graydon K. Newman, Jr. of
September; 1994 to allow construction of a · 1655 Sohns Point Road has made-application
single family res idence on the_ property. _ for lakeshore setback variances, hardcover
, 3. #2061 Arne Wasberg of 3135 North variance and land alteration conditional use
Shore Drive has made application for reriewal · permit for proposed deck walkways and sand
of 0-75 ' hardcover and "lai<eshore setback . fill incl_uding boulder retaining wall alterations ,
variances approved in September, 1994 for • within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone. _
the construction of additions to the existing : 12 . #2073 William ,and Susan Dunkley ·
residence . ·-·· J·--·:· _ · · -·: --· -· -of 2709 · Walters Port Lane have made
4 ... #2602 Ted Rozeboom of 2967 Casco application for lakeshore ·setback and
Point Road ... (the applicant)-and Josephine -.-_hardcover .variances and a Ian~ alteration
Knudson, owner·of 2965 ,Casco ·Poin) Road, .. _ ,,.c~nd1t1 _on.al . use . permit. for . retaining .)Vall ,
. h_ave made application .for .varia(lces to the , ~ sidewalk and driyeway_r econstruet,on, and
It was first published Monday,
the-1..!!:__ day of~/iJ&i.} 19'1:f_,
and was thereafter printd and published every
Monday, to and including Monday,
, zoning standards· for ·coriducting a home ":,construct~on of_-.three-season _porch· and
occupation. The applicant requests approval .. entryway additi ons, c1)! .,.Y,-J!h1n . t)le . 0-75' the d f
, ,oLa home _occupati9n .operated _by -th~_,'.._;;,.'-~~~~shorEls~tba<:'S~?ne.;,V ~/'" _;_·•.:•~;~ :; ----ayo _~-;,-..:-~---,t,...,. ___ 19 ___ ;
., . applicant .on a property ~nd within a 1:,rincipal · All pers.ons wishing to. be heard · will ~
structure ,n which he does not reside and for _ appear at this meeting .· Written comments
which the entrance to sa id home oc~upat ion are solicited ._ Plans are _ayailable i(l the City
is not .gained from with i n said princ i pal _.~ff \ce': for_,e".'!ew, by appoint~ent. : · 1
S!ruc~~r~063 °Ger-;,;;-~~~d C ~~da~e Ro:;ette .. ~-::· ., City of Orono -~•.::-~ ...... ~ , • -.. ' thorized Agent
of 3TT5 Bays id e Road have made application ·· : :,' , By: Planning Comm1SS1on -<:. _ ;,,. .. :_ ,
for hardcover.' and lakeshore setback :-.-:• ·-· ·_ · · · --·· • · .. k .. :, .,: '-'•,. '
variances for replacement of an existing decl< · ·_' -,. 0• Michael. I?. Gaffron;• Assistant Planning &
in.t~e O-J5' lakesh6re setback -zone .:..' -· ~ : ·';'" Zpning.Adm~mstra,t?r •,. ·-~.-;-,,~-~/ ·:~·~-'! '1 • Subscribed and t h'
-• 6. #2066' Robert and Iris Waade 'of 1487 --~-~--·-~-··• ·-. -"· ,--: .,.~ ·' --_ sworn O me Ont IS
Shoreline Dr ive have hade application for · (Published in The .laker and Pioneer,
_ .••. .:. ••. --.:-·-, .• _ .--. _,, __ -~ --~-Sept. 4, 1995)...:~~--~--~---...
By:
i./ rJr day of ¥kJ
4/:ldv
, 1912___
e ublic
a e n ormation
(1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users
for comparable space: $11.72 per inch.
(2) Maximum _rate allowed by law for above matter: $11.72.
(3) Rate actually charged for above matter: $6.80 per inch .
Each additional successive week: $4.90.
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ss.
CITY OF ORONO
I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing
concerning the matter of #2063 was mailed to the attached list
of property owners.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal
this 31st day of August, 1995.
Jami ~
. . . . ' . ;
CITY of ORri~o
Municipal Offices
Post Office Box 66
Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066
DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY
In accordance with M.S. 13.04, Subd. 2, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to
inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its
departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information.
You are notified that:
1.
'
3.
4.
5.
6.
The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the
permit or license requested.
You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit
or license.
The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent
necessary to process the permit or license.
If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some
information may become public.
You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 (see following page) to review private data
on yourself.
Your full name is required to process this application or permit.
Eli Z/ft3&T/i 'f} i~r-ow1v I~
First Middle Last
3 1775
Address
/1µ &;/;l_ -1./15-J /66
City State Phone
I understand my rights as ;,9-~bove. e£{ ctkk cJ,J( ~~
Signature
TELEPHONE-4!~357 • FAX -473-0510
Sec.13.04 RIGHTS OF SUBJECTS OF DATA
Subdivision 1. Type of data. The rights of individual on whom the data is stored or
to be stored shall be as set forth in this section.
Subd. 2. Information required to be given individual. An individual asked to supply
private or confidential data concerning himself shall be informed of: (a) the purpose and
intended use of the requested data within the collecting state agency, political subdivision, or
statewide system; (b) whether he may refuse or is legally required to supply the requested data;
( c) any known consequence arising from his supplying or refusing to supply private or
confidential data; and (d) the identity of other persons or entities authorized by state or federal
law to receive the data. This requirement shall not apply when an individual is asked to supply
investigative data, pursuant to section 13.82, subdivision 5, to a law enforcement officer.
The commissioner of revenue may place the notice required under this subdivision in the
individual income tax or property tax refund instructions instead of on those forms.
Subd. 3. Access to data by individual. Upon request to a responsible authority, an
individual shall be informed whether he is the subject of stored data on individuals, and whether
it is classified as public, private or confidential. Upon his further request, an individual who
is the subject of stored private or public data on individuals shall be shown the data without any
charge to him and, if he desires, shall be informed of the content and meaning of that data.
After an individual has been shown the private data and informed of its meaning, the data need
not be disclosed to him for six months thereafter unless a dispute or action pursuant to this
section is pending or additional data on the individual has been collected or created. The
responsible authority shall provide copies of the private or public data upon request by the
individual subject of the data. The responsible authority may require the requesting person to
pay the actual costs of making, certifying, and compiling the copies.
The responsible authority shall comply immediately, if possible, with any request made
pursuant to this subdivision, or within five days of the date of the request, excluding Saturdays,
Sundays and legal holidays, if immediate compliance is not possible. If he cannot comply with
the request within that time, he shall so inform the individual, and may have an additional five
days within which to comply with the request, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays.
Subd. 4. Procedure when data is not accurate or complete. An individual may
contest the accuracy or completeness of public or private data concerning himself. To exercise
this right, an individual shall notify in writing the responsible authority describing the nature of
the disagreement. The responsible authority shall within 30 days either: (a) correct the data
found to be inaccurate or incomplete and attempt to notify past recipients of inaccurate or
incomplete data, including recipients named by the individual; or (b) notify the individual that
he believes the data to be correct. Data in dispute shall be disclosed only if the individual's
statement of disagreement is included with the disclosed data.
The determination of the responsible authority may be appealed pursuant to the provisions
of the administrative procedure act relating to contested cases.
11
"
-
--
fl
RUN DATE 07/18/95
BATCH 503
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OHNERS LIST
REPORT NO. PI435401
PAGE 9 .
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE
.REPRESENTATION OF INF'ORMAtION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE. HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST
OF MY. KNOHLEDGE AND B:~::;~ BY 1m kuQQW .
,: ;,
A ;\1,t;.
Jf.,: ;,,.,.
; ' . .
• ,u.·; ·. ,2-1
1~• •
~.
! '
GEl<ALD Row i.$-r,E.
HARDCOVER CALCULATHJN WU!f.1\.::,tili.l!. 1
SETBACK ZONE: (CffiCLE ONE) ~ 75-,250' 25-500~, 500-1000'
!~5iZs~ HARDCOVER m ZONE x = J:j \k 4 S.F.
#<IP RAP
T)Oc.JL
Length
X
X
X
( 12 3 / ) . S.F. €')( C<-IA1>6.0
Width
=
B. Garage
. C Driv~way
~It .. a,.
D. Sidewalk
,,,
E. Patio/Deck
F. Landsc:ipe
Underlain
By Plastic.
Or Fabric•
woo(.)
G. Otherw~·
II
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ,. ·
A /142 .,. B
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A. House
Length
X
X
.. 42
x, 100
Width
_______ ,,, ........ 11<1••··• ... •' •• ,,-,-.. .,,..,.-,,...,.,.---
B. Garage
C. Driveway
D. Sidewalk
E. Patio/Deck
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
Or Fabri~
G. Other
x
··X
X
X
··1·
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
lt
TOT AL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
· 'TOTAL PROPERTY·AREA IN ZONE
. A· .. •. ·_;_.;......----., + .B
•' , ......... ,.
-------x. \00
'.. 14.
-=
= f-)' S.F. ( 59 .. ,1
.,. .. S.F·. fX(lt..tP(D
= ______ S.F.
= -:-::-,-;-,'.',-,--~,,.---S.F. ______ S.F.
jf
i • = .i L ,, ------S.F.
= S.F.
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
t ,: ,, •o•-• = .
=
=·
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
-·
-hi j ·, .
. ,
42"::>'• ----.--,--=-~--S.F.
--'/_7,_=0 __ .S.F.
_ _,_j-"-0~7 __ S.F.
__ .;...._ ___ S.F.
______ S.F.
---=-B __ S.F.
//42 S.F.
'Z.8,"2SO t "S.F,
4. tJ4-%
S.F. ------
------S.f. S.F. ------S.F. ------
..
S.F. ---,----
S.F. ------S.F.
S.F. ------S.F.
S.F.
-------,--S.F.
S.F. -----:--,S.F.
S.F.
S.P. ------
. S.F.
------s.r-.
% ----:::---
·\·
A
B
A
B
q~~t..O R.owLE"-rr IE-
. . HARDCOVER CALCULt~JJ.U.1:1,trUt<.h.~U.C:KJ
SETBACK ZONE; _ (ClRCLE QNE) . .~-J?~. . , .. --~ 25-500' 500-1000'
J:;XJ:~TL"IG HARDCOVER IN ZONE 1703 A. House X = S.F.
Length Width
j' , .. ·, ·-··
X =' i , .. ·-S.F.
1
X = S.F. ':
X = S.F.
B. Garage X = !· S.F.
C. Driveway X = 610 S.F.
X -' S.F.
D. Sidewalk X = l62 S.F.
X = S.F. . .. '
.. ,t:i
E. Pacio/Deck ,. S.F. X =
=·' I
X S.F.
F. l.indscape x· -··. -· .,, ..... ~-= ... ·BEB S.F.
Underlain X = S.F.
By Plastic. X = .S.F.
Or.Fabric•
t;.O-.JC., -···· ..
G. Other PAO· 2.6 X 2.6 = !, 7 S.F.
TOT AL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 3'327 S.F. A
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE /0~ 710 +-S.f:. I3 ,-:
A 3121 D t_tJ~ 710 X 100 = 31. (J-6___ % •
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A. House X = S.F.
Length Width
X = S.F. , .. '-· .... . ' "X = S.F . ,, . ..,
:•X = s·.F. ,j
B. Garage X =· S.F.
', '"'' ,.,.,, ..... , .. , ,,. .. . ~
\nll•' ··--· ' ... , ... ' ,. -~ .. ' ' , IY'I'•• f •· ~ ,,,.,_.
C. Driveway X = S.F.
X = S.F.
D. Sidewalk X = S.F.
X = S.F.
E. Pacio/Deck X = S.F.
X = S.F.
.f. Landscape X = •S.F.
Underlain X = "···s.F.
By Plastic X = S.F.
Or fabric
G. Other l{. -· S.P.
/,
TOT AL HARDCOVER IN ZONE S.F. A
s. r-. t3
TOT AL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE x. 100 -%
A + B
14
.,._ ..
.. ~ .. ,\
I
Inspections:
~g e,,,_~1 F~g Ll-zc !':·.s~~~..-.,-. l,'B
f:i.nal -----co·-----·•---·--
Str-;)•~i~IT-··~--·· ------.,___ -·---·-------
G!-~::P.AL PB~ i:T::;
1)-'l't!. ?b, Date L"l.Sf:!,
PLribg ----··--........ , _____ ..
:?h~.lres f
li~i::-"' ;,..~-
---·
--------
-----·-... -----·· ---
za;rnc
A .. -ea
vadsnce
Dlst.
Se""'""'t"""S ... acl~~s---
--------··---
Said. ~e ------------
Addres~------------------
Phone __ ....,?,_7<-+-7_-_..,.z_e,_c;....,1 tt,_) __ _
PRINCIPAL SI'RUCIURE TYPE --
Bsmt: Fln Att-a Unf.ir. Are'J. ''" ___ _
-~t(' --------··
__ ,_o_ Depth __J_L /t.rea __ LZO -:...14' ~
ACCESSORY 'S'TPJJClU?.E TYPE JI', ~~~-----
Widti. Z. ') .Depth ~4 _ Area~l_.--. S',-,,
Est 0'1,pleticn Date___ __ ~cle .. ~
-c ~ • Vl l ~ 6 01( le.tp ~Nit•~
~t •. ,mstru=t:i.cn a ue 1 ~. ooo ~ ~It cftt1Cft1N
1,vt ?1idth ___ Depth ___ ftsea __ tU•\fr-.
Lakeshore: Yes Ne,
Wetla:i1ds: Yes_ :-.o __
Pr.:,r... Setbadcs: Front __ !'.ear __ _
Side Lake --·----·------·---
.~~-w::.:15'.!il!:? ... ~1-. ---•.:s:::sa~t?:5!1AC _,_.!£_._. ~.:C:---~&!dL!UC
/,PPLICAN'l' ~vsr &'tr..~~IT wrm 1'HlS f-l)ft•!:
: O)PIBS c-;: PJ..A:IB D!W\'111 ro SCA!..6 • A CSR1'1Fl'j\TE Q,_t.
SURVEY OF 'It IE wr, .AND nm PIA~ P'.dVTrn·~ FEE.
n1e undersigned het\->by makes a:,pl.i,.aticn for a ~::ild·
lng pemi.t for the work des.-:1ibed, agrees t~1 do c;.:rt
wo·rlc in strict accoNance with the ordinance~ ot :.he
Citv of Orr.no m,d rulings -.,; t}1e, State Building COIU'
Dh'i.siai, and d..nclares t.10.t au racts a-:id rc;,rosen-
tatio11s ~tatod here~ are true 11nd cr:-rrect.
,.-----------~-----------Slgnat".a-e
~~----------------------· !)ate
a
'l
' .
Sec. No.
LAND DESCRIPTION
Size of lot
VILLAGE OF ORONO BUILDING PERMIT
PURPOSE OF BUILDING
BUILDER
ADDRESS
PHONE NO.
PERMIT N2
Block Addition or Subdivision
BUILDING LOCATION
Dis. From Road
Dis. Sides
Dis. Back
Drainage
Brick, Solid
Brick Veneer
Cement Block
tftt--
,, . Percentage of light to Floor Area
Span
FOOTINGS ,1
Depth 1) ~--~d:9
· least Depth I 11
.SEPTIC TANKS OR MUNICIPAL HOOKUP 0
Size
Width D Below Grade V" y'
FOUNDATION. Construction Size l'\I
BASEMENT c_
Ground Drolnage O• l Floor ·
Distance From Well
Construction
DRAINFIELD
Depth
Width
length
Distance From Well
Distance From lot lines
2222
Bearing Posts } J ..I .....-J, ,/I (. Size Spacing
Beam, (;,.t'-"11, ,I o-t~ Size Span PLUMBING FIXTURES
Garbage Disposal /
Sinka/
/ .5f.oJ rJ-•_,. r-o,,,l,eJ ,...-,
J>.,.1,.,, .. .,. .. T
CHIMNffl L I . I.-: NO. OF FIREPLACES Zi.:.
No. iN. Ca.. ~~ Type
Foundation
Height Above Roof 't-
Smoke Pipe-Distance From Joists t " ~ , ) ( ~ ~
FLOORS if J' /
Sub Floorlng ,.,, }~h-~-,r·
Joists .;),_ ..,_, 1 O Size r;r-Span / J
Spacing I 0" Bridging / t.j.. 3
Bearing '1""
STUDDINGS
Size ?,. 4-.J.
Spacing : I.?••
Plates J)
EXITS
RAFTERS ,J. 1(-..._~E!J~G JOIST~
Size J.. "-SI(;'/'' 0 · G
Spacing~ 4'-"' ✓ Spacing
Span longest Span
Bracing
Basement -No. Size
ht Floor -No •• ?, \, I~ O Size
Stairway /
Stairway
INSULATION -Celflng O 5 fl f c,_ Walls , >'
PLUM BE..._ ________________ _
ADORE . .__ ________________ _
SEWER CONTRACTO,..._ ___________ _
ADORE·~-----------------
Laundry
Bath Tub/
Dish Washer /
Shower
Toilet /
Lavatory/
'J,.i, o I 10 . J--;0 -t 1
____ Sewage .. $ ___ _
Well$ Total$
'1\l ,.
;a
:,.
""
,,,.
0.
~
ti!>
·<'!I,.
.....
'\'I:>-
,e
TOTAL TAX
TOTAL PAID
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
1990 TAX BOOK
38 ORONO
.00
.oo
REPORT NO. PI433401
OWNER MORT CODE/LOAN#
ESCROH NAME/ADDRESS
ADDITION NAME LOT BLK PLAT PARCEL PROPERTY I.D.
TAXPAYER NAME/ADDRESS
METES AND BOUNDS
ACREAGE SCH HTR SEH PROPERTY ADDRESS SN THP RG QQ SUFX
GR & CE ROWLETTE
GERALD L RmlLETTE
3775 BAYSIDE RD
LONG LAKE MN 55356
LOTS 5 6 7 8 13 23 AND 24 OTTOVILLE
LOTS 15 16 19 20 21 AND 22 SAID PLAT
22 AND 24 LYING NELY Of A LINE 30 FT
DES LINE COM AT TIIE NH COR OF THE SE
TH S ALONG THE H LINE OF SAID SE 1/4
RIGHT 48 DEG A DIS Of 90 FT TO TIIE
DEF LEFT 83 DEG TO THE SLY EXT OF THE
ALSO THAT PART OF THE VAC LAKE VIEi~
TAXABLE MARKET 201,900
DST SIID DST
OTTOVILLE ON LAKE MINNETONKA
000.00 278 3 3775
STATUS: CURRENT
ON LAKE MINNETONKA AND THAT PART OF
AND OF THE VAC LAKE ST ADJ TO LOTS
NELY OF AND PAR HITII THE FOLLOMING
1/4 OF THE N11 1/4 OF SEC 5 T 117 R 23
OF TIIE NW 1/4 A DIS OF 234 FT Tit DEF
POINT OF BEG OF THE LINE BEING DES Tit
E LINE OF LOT 15 AND THERE ENDING
AVE ADJ TO SAID LOTS 5 6 23 AND 24
GROSS TAX CAPACITY 5,173
NET TAX CAPACITY 4,377
RENTAL TAX
IF PROJ AMT
QUALIFYING AMT
FD SHARED TC
FD AREA RATE
IF PROJECT NO.
4,145.67
00000000
DIVISION NO
DIVISION DATE
SEE IDS
TAX LEVY/DESCRIPTION
GROSS TAX
STATE PAID AID
IIACA
IIMSTDPRTYP
II RL
RATE
94. 7150
24.0850
11554 1989 DEL UTILITIES
TOTAL TAX
TOTAL PAID
AMOUNT
5,953.80
1,054.20CR
753.93CR
53.95
'•,199.62
.oo
LAND
108,600
BLDG
93,300
42860 2105 05-117-23 24 0111
BAYSIDE RD
CONSTRUCTION YEAR 1969
MACII O~IN% BASEl BASEZ NHBASE
1 00 680 640
AMT UNPAID 4,199.62
NON-HMST
3,057
OWNER MORT CODE/LOAN tt
ESCROH NAIIE/ADDRESS
ADDITION NAME LOT BLK PLAT PARCEL PROPERTY I.D.
TAXPAYER NAME/ADDRESS ACREAGE SCH WTR SEH PROPERTY ADDRESS SN THP RG QQ SUFX
(;', METES AND BO\JllDS OST SIID DST
82f, AUDITOR'S SUODIVISIOH HO. 203
000.00 278 3 38
!. U fl.IS I CURA(HT
41440
ADDRESS UUASSIGHED
05-117-23 24 0112
.'f,"?\
!'f!J':t
·"""
,-.,,
,.,.,,
""'·
;r.:,"
,.,~
,,,,..~
,.,~,
.•/."'•·
~
"-'
-,_
"' z
,..,
"' -..--5
~
·'
(9)
" 291
~-
F7 CF
LCT 53
( 14)
i ~
537. O!
I
I
m.22 '
I
' 5?9.0 I
525. 5.d
~ ~
2
3
2
(38)
5 V
521.85 (39)
5 I 13)
SIS. 05 ' '
( I 4) 7
514. 27
( : 5) e
510. ~5
( 15; 9
:CS. 7
.. ,
I
(37)
w :-,
·'-::...
~ ~ ~
I /,.90'
~ ij
( 10)
:;:,
·' ~I ,,,. ,-
•s:i 157
90
.:c.,
!'
--------
.?,
... ,.__
N89'44' 16''.¥
149. 05
II~
12 '
( I 16t
I ◄ f
\;
' ' I
13
i/Jl!ffi
1_1,.
v·
( 16)
~ ., ·..,
N87'VI
134. 85
\12
\11
10\
13
15 /,
14 ;
13 :'
/12
10 9 8
f
15:J. ;9
=··: .... :5
6
: 7
8
I"
( 115) I
2
.. 3
t::4\
C
0
::, z
..-,,,,..-
. lY
D I
7 ;.,~,
E5
( l 12)
;;.,.
I! v·
55 I
I --------·····--~t\~~---
.t' .• ----·--"--·-·-··-··-··---.. \.~
i
i
I
I