The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutProject PacketORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 22, 1991 (14)ZONING FILE 11629-MCNULTY CONSTRUCTION CONTINUED We w8uld ask Council t 1 also cunsider the fact that the proper-t.:y own ~r hci s g i v,,n ;:p substanti ;1l property rights. Restrictions have been r~corded i ri the chain of title. The applica .,1t hds expended substanti ,11 funds to constru::t the accessory s t:.ructure containing uLili ty, s~curi ty a;1d s:tpport facilities more than sufficient to handle this addition he is now proposing. It would place an unnecessary financial hardship, aa well as an environmental burden on the property, if the applicant has to duplicate those services should he choose to put the 1,190 s.f. addition on the existing home. Annther issue f,">r consideration is that given this property, 3.n i,:.s present condition with the oversized structu1~e already permitted, it seems to me that special conditions a?plying to the property are definitely peculiar to this property a :1d do not apply generally to any other land or structures in the District in which this proper~y is located. Th,=it is bas,==d on what has been done. In summary, hardships are very d.i ff icul t. It seems to me that the basic thrust of the applicant's position is that there should be consistency and u~iformity of application to the Zoning Ordinance to a particuldr piece of property. That consistency ;:ind uniformity does point tc> tl1e Council's approval of this minimal Variance that the applicant is requesting." Taylor noted an error he believed to exist on page five of the propos.~d resolution whe,~e it stat,==d in paragraph nine that the actual floor area of the sports center is 15,836 s .f., rather than 13,886 s.f. It was :-,1oved by Butler, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt the Resoluti~n for denial as presented by City Staff. Motion, Ayes-2, Mayor P2terson, Goetten, ar1d Callahan, Nay. Motion failed. It was moved by Callahan, s:=conded bf Mayor Peterson, to conceptually appro~e the Varian~e request to construct an addition to the e;~isting sports center. Staff is directed to prepare an appropriate resolution for Council's consideration at their M.::ty 1.3, l 9 91 m,,)eting. Motion, Ayes-3, Butler, Jabbour, Nay. Motion passed. (IS)ZONING FILE #1634-JAMES & JOAN MAUS 3700 BAYSIDE ROAD VARIANCE-RESOLUTION #2954 Jim and Joan Maus were present. 8ernhardson stated that this a2plication involves a request for a side setbac!< Variance to construct an addition to the existing residence. He added that due to the location of the -7 - ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 22, 1991 {#5)ZONING FILE #1634-MAUS CONTINUED adj a cent r2sidential structures, a:1 a .,,er age L,keshore setback Variance must al.-:,o be addressed. Bernhards(m nob!d that the Pl~nning Commission recommended approval of this application. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2954, granting a side setback and a-1erage l.=i.keshore setback Variance to constru~t a n addition to the existing residence of James and Joan Maus, located at 3700 B~yside R0ad. All voted aye. MotiJn passed. {#6)ZONING FILE #1636-STEVEN TIBBETTS 1810 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCE-RESOLUTION #2955 Steven Tibbetts was present. Bernhardson provided a 1)rief s~1mmary of t :1.e statistics for Mr. Tibbetts' property, as outlined Mabusth's April 11, 1991, memo. He note:: that the Commission had recommended approval. h=1.rdcover in Jeanne Planning It was moved by Callahan, seconded by B~tler, to adopt Resolution #2955, granting after-thc-fa~t hardcover and side aetback Variances f )r t ~l.e construction of an addition to the principal structure of Steven Tibbetts, located ~t 1810 Shadywood Road. All voted aye-Motion passed. {#7)ZONING FILE #1637-SPRING HILL 725 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-RESOLUTION Jud Dayton was present, Mitchell. LAND COMPANY #2956 w::.s hi.s a 'c.torney, R,:,bert Bernhard son r,=::viewed t:1e ii_;sues p ,::ortaining t<J tliis application as set forth in Jeanne Mabusth's memo dated April 12, 1991, and her additional A~,ril 19, 1991 comments b,-ised 011 the Planning Commission's review. He stated that a question had arisen at the Public H;:aring regarding whether o...::-not the "for- profit" company wou~_d be able to operate and lease out other conference space. T!1e i 1i tial opinion was that would not bt-, allowed. However, either the Church or th2 Freshwater Biological Foundation would b~= able to do so. B,:=·rnhardson advised that Staff al~,o learned that as long as the property is owned by a "for-p,:-of it" company, it will remain 011 the t=i.x r :)lls, even thou~h the property will be leas,;:d to non-profit organizations. Bernhardson asked Mabusth to cl.arify t~e issue of legal combination of the parcels involved with the Conference Center. Mabusth confirmed that the applicant has agreed to legally combine the parcels on which the Conference :i_s located. She noted t.·1at an amended lE~tter h=1.s bi,-)en r,=::cei ved f :::-om the applicant's attorney setting forth the revisions deemed necessary -8 - CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 APPLICATION NO. 1634 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION Date of Notice: 4/25/91 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: James & Joan Maus COPIES: 3700 Bayside Road Long Lake, MN 55356 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance DATE OF MEETING: 4/22/91 VOTE: 5 For O Against COUNCIL ACTION -MOTION: To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution enclosed herewith. Variance Approval is limited to the extent shown on approved plan and as noted in the approval resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to further review by the City. Variance approval expires one year after date of approval. Permit application must be submitted no later than April 22, 1992. If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 15, 1991 (J4)ZONING FILE ~1633-MCDERMOTT CONTINUED created the hardship for this property by allowing the house to :Je construct2d so close to the rear propert y line. Rowlette asked whether it would be appropriate for the Planning Commission to address the excess hardcover in the 75-250' foot setback area, even though the a?plicant is proposing no increase in hardcover. Mabusth explained Council's recent directiv -:s to have plastic und,=r landscape areas removed if hardcover percentages exceed the City's standards. She informed the Planning Commission that they have the right to ask the applicant to remove the landscape plastic that exists in the 75-250' setback area. Cohen stated that he preferred to leave his motion as is. M~)tion, Ayes-6, Johnson, Nay. Motion carried. Johnson believed that the excess hardcover in the 75-250' aetback area should have been addressed. (fS)ZONING FILE #1634-JAMES & JOAN MAUS 3700 BAYSIDE ROAD VARIANCE-PUBLIC HEARING James and J~an Maus were present. At 7:37 p.m., Kell-::y open,:d the Public Hearing, a ;~d asked Mabusth to provide a brief explanation of the application. Mabus~h stated that the applicants are seeking approval of side setback and average lakeshore setback Variances to construct an addition to their existing residence. She noted that when the property W3S divided, the p:::-operty W3.S within the RR-lA Zoning District, whi.::h required five acres and a :30 foot side setback. i1abusth stated that because it was built prior to zoning code requirements, not only does the existing residence not meet a 50 foot side s~tback, but it does not meet a 30 foot side s~tback, as required under the present zoning classification of LR-lA. Kelley asked the M,rnses if they knew when the addition o .'.1 the east side of the house was constructed. Joan Maus s~ated that the east a::1dition m"Jst have been constructed at least ten years ago ~y the previous owner of the property. Rowlette stated that she had lived near this house for 17 years, and that the east addition had originally been a porch, which was then converted into a family room. Kelley asked Mabusth if she had received any input from the Mauses' neighbors. Mabusth stated that she had not received a~ything from the neighbors. James M::ius advised that the B:1rgers and the O.lsons fully supported their addition plans. -7 - ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 15, 1991 (j5)ZONING FILE tl 63 4 -MAUS CONTINUED There were n:J i?'.1blic comments regarding this m:1tter, and Kelley closed th e Public Hearing at 7 :<!0 p .m. It was mov ed approval of t:ie Va riances based on 9, 1991 memo. All b y Rowl ette, seconded by Hanson, to recommend side setbac k a ~d average lakesho=e setback the six hardships and noted in Mabusth's April voted a y e. Motion carried. (#6)ZONING FILE Jl635-JOHN O'SULLIVAN & ERWIN SMITH 2420 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCE/COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW-PUBLIC HEARING John O'Sullivan was present. Kelley opened the P~blic H~aring at 7:08 p.m. Mabusth reviewed the issues invol v ed with John O'Sullivan's request for a 10' x 25' concrete block addition onto the east side of the car wash portion of his service station. (See Jeanne Mabus th' s A:;,ril 8, 19 91 m2mo. ) Mabusth asked ~·lr. 0 ·Sullivan if he would explain why additional storage could not be provided on top or below the existing building. 0' Sullivan responded, "Fr::)m an engineering standpoint, placing a storage area under the building would not be a viable alternative. The itess may freeze if stor,:d on top of the building, and I would think that placing a storage area 0'.1 top would create an e y e-sore. We are planning to locate the storage area b,:hind the car w.3.sh where it will v irtuall y be invisible from Shadywood Road. We had discussed an alternate plan with the Building Department involving construction of a raised platform within the car wash bay. We determined, however, that it would be more cost effective to add onto the exterior of the building, rather than the interior. The::::-e may also b :~ a problem with moisture if the computerized equipment is stored within the car wash bay." There were no comments from the p•.1blic on this matter, and Kelley closed the Public Hearing at 7:15 p.rn. :<elley asked M3.busth if the City h3.d received any comments from the Freshwater Biological Institute. Mabusth replied, "No, the City has heard nothing from them." Johns::m noted that it will be necessary to remove trees to construct the addition asked Mr. O'Sullivan to explain his plans for screening. 0' Sullivan explained, "At the m:Jst, W·= will be removing one tree. I like trees, but the one in question is a Cottonwood that plugs our air conditioning and heating systems, two or three -8 - To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: April 9, 1991 Subject: #1634 James & Joan Maus, 3700 Bayside Road - Variance -Public Hearing Zoning District -LR-lA Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) -Side setback variance required for proposed rear addition to existing residence. Required= 30' Proposed= 10 1 6 11 Variance= 19'6" or 65% List of Exhibits Exhibit A -Application Exhibit B -Property Owners List Exhibit C -Plat Map Exhibit Dl-3 -Hardcover Fact Sheets Exhibit E -Existing Site Plan Exhibit F -Proposed Site Plan Exhibit G -1977 Subdivision Exhibit H -Weckman Memo Exhibit I -Septic Map Exhibit J -Elevations Exhibit K -Floor Plans Exhibit L -Cross Section Review of Application - The applicant seeks approval of a side setback variance for a 18'x22' addition to the rear or north side of existing structure. The 2\ story addition shall replace an existing sunken patio area that wi 11 result in a reduction in hardcover within the 250-500' setback area. Please review hardcover fact sheets (Exhibit Dl thru D 3). There is no house on the property to the east {review Exhibit C), the house to the immediate west (review Exhibit G) is 1 oca ted behind the subject structure. An average lakeshore setback variance would be required although based on topography and existing year-round vegetation along west lot line, there is no view impact. The entire structure is located in front of the front line of the residence structure to the west. Although lots are not platted to the lakeshore, each of the properties have separate legal parcels that provide them with riparian access to the lake. Technically we are obliged to address the need for an average lakeshore setback variance, Zoning File #1634 April 9, 1991 Page 2 of 3 The property was subdivided in approximately 1977 and at the time was zoned R-lA, 5 acre minimum dry contiguous. The property was recently rezoned with the Landmark subdivision application and is now zoned LR-lA, 2 acre minimum lot density. Applicant notes the following hardships: 1. Interior layout/design -applicants have been asked to submit interior plans to support hardship (this will not be included in your Wednesday packet). Applicants' consultant has advised that they will be able to make the Friday packet deadline. 2. Architectural design of the structure would be destroyed if located at any other side of the house. Staff would add the following: 3. The location of the house on the property does not meet either 5 acre (50' side) or 2 acre (30' side) zoning standards. 4. Lakeside addition would destroy not only the design, but would allow the structure to encroach further into the average lakeshore setback area. 5. Expansion to west is restricted because of existing septic system. 6. Structure will encroach no closer than the existing structure to the side lot line. Mr. Weckman's memo and septic inventory map (Exhibits Hand I) confirm that the proposed addition wi 11 not inpact the existing septic system nor burden the existing system with increased use. Weckman does caution if the loft area is converted,to a legal bedroom, the septic system would have to be re-evaluated at that time. The addition at a maximum height of 21\' meets the allowed height requirement of 30'. Options of Action - Denial. If denied, please refer to the necessary findings in your zoning code; or Zoning File #1634 April 9, 1991 Page 3 of 3 Approval. To approve the variance application of James and Joan Maus of 3700 Bayside Road seeking approval of average lakeshore and side setback variances for a proposed 18'x22' addition to the rear or north side of the existing residence to be located 10'6" from the side lot line instead of the required 30'. Approval is based on one or more of the findings noted above, and is subject to the following condition: Applicants are placed on notice that if loft area is converted to a legal bedroom, the septic system would have to be re-evaluated at the time of such improvements. Additional Comments and Planning Commission Recommendations - April 17, 1991 Additional Exhibit - Exhibit M -Floor Plan of Existing Residence The Planning Commission unanimously granted approval of the side setback and average lakeshore setback variance application of the applicants adopting the hardships and findings noted above, subject to the condition that would place applicants on notice that if loft area is converted to legal bedroom, the septic system would have to be re-evaluated at the time of such improvement. The enclosed resolution has been drafted including the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission approval. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) AND SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 (B) FILE 11634 WHEREAS, James and Joan Maus (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 3700 Bayside Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Burger's Bayside, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"): and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) and Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) to permit the construction of an 18'x22' addition to the rear or north side of the existing residence that will be located 10'6" from the east side lot line instead of the required 30' and that portion of addition will be located in front of an average lakeshore setback line. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counci 1 of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1634. 2. The property is located in the LR-lA Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 2 acres in area for each residential lot. The property consists of 5+ acres. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 15, 1991, and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings and hardships: Side Setback Variance A) The interior layout or design of the floor plan of the existing house will allow for an expansion only to the rear or north side. B) Architectural design of the structure would be destroyed if the addition is located at any other side of the house. Page 1 of 5 C) The existing house is located 10' from the lot line. D) Lakeside addition would destroy not only the design, but would allow the structure to encroach further into an average lakeshore setback area. E) Expansion to west is restricted because of existing septic system. F) Structure will encroach no closer than the existing structure to the side lot line. Average Lakeshore Setback Variance A) The existing residence structure is located in front of the average lakeshore setback line. B) Lots are not platted to the lakeshore but have separate legal parcels that provide each with riparian access to the lake. C) Steep topography to the east will minimize any view impact upon a future residence. D) Existing year-round vegetation and topography along west minimizes impact upon existing residence to the west. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district: that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property: would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty: is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants: and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the after-the-fact variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of an 18 'x2 2' addition to the north or rear side of the existing residence and per Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) grants a variance to the average lakeshore setback as portions of addition will be located in front of the average lakeshore setback line. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicants are placed on notice that if loft area is converted to a legal bedroom, the septic system shall be re- evaluated at the time of such improvement. 2. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (April 22, 1992). 3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on beha 1 f of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 5 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of April, 1991. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of April, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 CITY OP ORONO -VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application PROPERTY LOCATION fee) Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) t!J ;:r-. 1/7,,;?...,'? ;;zt/ t?Oti:,f Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Phone (home) J/:7t. -h I :!J-3 Phone (work) C/3C,-L/ ?'d 7 OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) _______ ~ Name Phone (work) -------- Address: City: ________ Zip: ____ _ Date Property Acquired \\ -&::S-(month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property SJ::.A.}fl ~L 1-~ \z L.S · Other (specify) Residential --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 2.5 c()O \J f'.Q.:r P._,v<.:.'i... _:,-.:, c..o~ .f-,flvGr ~/0 A 5 .DEr.JbV \..>-JZ-H~ --;14 c..... S T..,)L 5t. 7)/34C.. k, O '4 Wtrc. i-l £ P:S7:I.1Vjr Describe request in detail: HoMt, -;;s N pu..( 1-o CAT£D· VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area ( Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances Front Side Rear) HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: -rt;\ C t\OI""-L 1.ucv ..... D l..c.:oc:.. CJU• G:f: ?LP.Ct :C 1 ·"M-\-t. 1'0~1:"1°::S:o\J wt-1?.L AQ P<iO n., AN ,Hc..'l A~- DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:~v...~N~?~"'---=D~~'---·~r_\.\-~~"'---')\'---'~~[\/\;....;....t._,~~-~~/-·~~t~~~~~s ~~~ivl';....;....~~r~_;.:.:i::_AI~~~ 'Tf·t't.., .SLT \31?<:,.t Mi·A.--· \\.~D ~? J..;;, ,q 'i., i~'i...:;r NA.TvllA\..r PLA-C{_, REQUIRED SUBMITTALS .'::fdl--f"'J.l-1,S I\D.i). 1. Completed Application Form 2 •. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain ( this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. s. 6. 7. 8. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8~"xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8~"xll"). Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8~"xll"). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide al 1 information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this a plication, and certifies that the information supplied is to .,..t.he b~st of his/her knowledge. c,..____ I~ Applicant's Signature ~ Date S / ol /' / 9 / OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission membe , and Council members for purposes of investiga- tion and verification J:his re~~st. {,~ [VL.~ Owner's Signature ~ Date --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. \,.. \..... •.__. ..._ l. II ~ - -. RUN DATE 03/25/91 BATCH 006 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AD DR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER . NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 05-117-23 21 0001 00055 STUBBS BAY RD N CITY OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO CITY CLERK PO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 05-117-23 21 0009 . 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STATE OF MINN STATE OF MINN IDNR¢ (LUCE LINE TRAIL) 38 05-117-23 21 0015 03750 BAYSIDE RD JOHN BURGER ETAL JOHN BURGER 3750 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 24 0069 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED J B MAUS & J E MAUS JAMES B & JOANE MAUS 3700 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 24 0083 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED JOHN BURGER ET AL JOHN BURGER 3750 BAYSIDE RD LqNG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 24 0118 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STATE LAND DEPT CITY OF ORONO PARK 4/13/79 ST DEED 156753 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 05-117-23 21 0002 03750 BAYSIDE RD JOHN BURGER ETAL JOHN BURGER 3750 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 21 0012 03625 EILEEN ST JOHN G PIDGEON & HIFE JOHN & MAGDALEN PIDGEON 10912 GLEN HILDING LANE BLOOMINGTON MN 55431 38 05-117-23 21 0016 03700 BAYSIDE RD J B MAUS & J E MAUS JAMES B & JOANE MAUS 3700 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 24 0070 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED J B MAUS & J E MAUS JAMES B & JOANE MAUS 3700 BAYSIDE . RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 24 0084 00038 ADDRESS .UNASSIGNED JOHN BURGER ET AL JOHN BURGER 3750 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 TOTAL BATCH 006 00016 REPORT .NO. PI435401 PAGE 15 38 05-117-23 21 0005 03780 BAYSIDE RD HAZEL ANDERSON HAZEL ANDERSON 3780 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN . 55356 38 05-117-23 21 0013 03630 EILEEN ST DH ILSE & SL ILSE DAVID & SHEROKEE ILSES 3630 EILEEN ST MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 05-117-23 24 0039 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HERBERT TOLSON & WIFE HERBERT TOLSON 3640 BAYSIDE ROAD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 24 0082 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED DANIEL P CAHILL MRS DANIEL CAHILL 224 N 5TH ST DELAVAN HI 53115 38 05-111~23 24 0115 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STATE LAND DEPT CITY OF ORONO PARK 4/13/79 ST -DEED 156753 ( _~;·r_,..2:0- , ) ' -~···/ •·· .. ~-t:> t:;_J/ .,J ,A~ ,r·· ·-·1 ( .. J't\. ,} •-.....,;,, .,.,;,/ .. .,,....__ ; .. ,,..· _; .) . .J" .) _; -· ·.....__ ....... ,. L \.... '-. ... RUN DATE 03/25/91 ~ATCH 006 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 16 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PRO/(E TAXATION, TO,,fHE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIE':;;' ,;( __ ·. . DA~~BY .k , , r vv . ,!r (' 't:'\ ,!· f d J. l·,.} I , I r,.; \' ,,, \, \ . --... -. -.... ' _;· i:.:.~ ·), 1··--. I -., '··~ p.JI ,~"- 1 ~.Y.:;.J I . ..J ._./ ._I .J' .) . ' . ' > .-; .· . . II 18 I I 1 f i ',,, . •, • 1 • ·.' I'!::::: ..•..•• ····:,. n r::1 c;;,691 IM I!'! A l ( 11) ,, 10 , a 1 1: .. ~ .. .,_ 11 (./') l------':+.---::--1 10 c.!) ~ ...... ~-"""'!"~----, ~ l------+---:--1 (./') I---'...:'._ .. --i-....,....-l----1 /. ........... ;,,, -,.. ,, r::::J tZ \ · .. ., · .... 10 , a 1 6 .. 5 X -n , C C C g C - I- t. [, x:csTJ:,vc'.r {\~t) ,? 70-4~S ,,'-).~C!!~.._gw HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET ff I I;~~, G ~:! A SETBACK ZONE: (c IR CLE ONE)--_ffjji§j 250-5QU~•C,0 50 Q:)'.arj·~' @ J f4· .JC EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE T\ -------------------------- A, . HOUSE _y_·o;::,,::;..._ ___ X -:2,.2. = _·_~;;...., ..:..&_0 __ S, F, LENGTH WIDTH ~ · 11 , s-1 '-lu ----'"-----X -----= -----S, F, \ ~ (o --. ~5 ----==---X -----__ .:.._/ '--S, F, _·_·~-----· ·x-------2 -i ----;,· ··· -1-<J--z-S,F, S--'L c I 7(p -----X -----= -----S, F, B. GARAGE I ':5" x _..;;;;z ;;_~.,:__ __ = __ 3_'1 _o_ s. F. C, DRIVEWAY __ ;_·!) ___ X __ \_l_o __ = __ /__;4 _3_· _cJ_ S,F, -----X -----= -----S, F, o. s IDEWALK _4_-___ x _ ____;;;"G;,_o __ = ___ ~_0 __ s. F. -----X -----= -----S, F, P / -----X -----= -----S,F, E, ATIO DECK ~ Is-' /?J _....:;__ ___ X -~=----= ----'---S, F, FI LANDSCAPE -----X = ----------S,F, AREAS ~· UNDERLAIN '7 " J -::i . 0 BY -----X __ v~·C.....;;...J __ = c., S, F, PLASTIC ----- SHEETING -----X -----= -----S,F, -----X -----= -----S,F, G, OTHER -----X -----= -------S,F, Toi"AL .. HARDCOVER IN ZoNE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE u _, C ·t~5-P,,vJ- HARncovER CALCUIJITION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250'~~ 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZoNE -------------------------- A, · House X -----= -----S,F, LENGTH WIDTH X -----= -----S,F, S \-\~D ~ 1. \2... ¥ \?.. \ '1 X q <.r '7 A I..J _ _...;.. ___ = __ c..,_u_-=---1 _ S, F, X -----= -----S,F, (o \) .. j' 5 i.\.s D \! 2 X '3 z ·S-_____ = -----S,F, B, GARAGE 9 X 2i ------~ = --~-~~3_,_~~ S,F, C, DRIVEWAY } 2... X z_ i ·3 ~ '- -------= -----S,F, X -----= -----S,F, D, SIDEWALK 3 X z::;-70 --~--= -----S,F, X -----= -----S,F, ·E, bATI0/;1. -~:i. X 2 -2. ECK ID ,~ X j i ~4 _.....;;_,....;;;;;;,_ __ = __ ""1..;....._~-S,F, -----= _ ___;....1B_() __ S,F, F,lANDSCAPE X -----= -----S,F, AREAS UNDERLAIN BY X -----= -----S,F, PLASTIC SHEETING lo zo X ---=-----= _z_o_· _b __ s. F. X -----= -----S,F, G, OTHER X -----= -----S,F, -, 1) 11 , ~ S,F, .. ToTAL HARDCOVER IN ZoNE ~ . ··-·-· ...... ··--··--3 7 s-47 TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE S,F, m [il ill I Q'. ,1.5 7@ '£ . 7,-4 X 100 = l.\' -% HARDCOVEit C..\LCULi; TI ON \~ORKSHE=:T SE TBAC K ZONE: (CIRC L: ONE) 0-75' 75-250' ~ 500-1000' EXIS TIN G HAR DCOVE~ IN ZoNE A, · Hous E l Y · 22 X _:;;._ __ ...;._, = LENG TH WIDTH C 1-tIM AJt, ~ '2-_____ x ____ _ \ "Z.. ~ S ~o ~ \ __,;...\ '-____ x _...;,.I _~.;___-- _____ x ____ _ 5 µ.i,O ~ Z ~ ,·y-.:Y-_____ X ____ _ B, GARAG E 3 C, DRIVEWAY ) L X _ __;,2_.._~-- & (o _x ____ _ -----X ----- = = = = = = = 3't '7 1·-Z.. "' Z..o i '3 2 ~.) Z 7Lf 31 ~ o. s roewALK __ 3 ___ x __ z_.Y-___ = __ ,__;:;,Y _· __ s. F. 2r la [>O -----X --~--= -----S,F, -----X -----= -----S,F, E. PATIO/_ DECK -----X -----= .;.._.. ____ s. FI F,lANDSCAPE -----X -----= -----S,F. AREAS UNDERLAIN ID ·-z..o 2.,0() BY -----X -----= -----S,F, PLASTIC SHEETING -----X -----= -----S,F, -----X -----= -----S,F, G. OTHER _____ x _____ = ____ _ S,F, S,F, ' - TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZON E ----/ol/S-· ~ S,F. ---·---·-· -· -·· -. --I ~--· ,-, -. ~3 '7S'-/ 17 TOTAL PROPERTY AREA .IN ZONE 0 [il % D-3· ') · .. -:.~~,l~(·~--- 1 ..... -,.--- --""- •'' , ' ... I 50. l'l "' 4 I"\ ~~-00--~~C~ouor~ RoQd No. 81 ---:--- : .C) / ,..:~ i . . ;, ¥'," ' \~~ ·~~ , l I Building Location Survey for Jam es B. Maus in Lot 2, Block 1, Burger's Bayside Hennepin County, Minnesota ---;..,,,r:-- ' ' . ,, ,, ' I 1,0· I hereby certify that this is a true and correct repr esentat ion of a survey of the location of four bujldings in relation to the South and East lines of Lot 2, Block i', BURGER'S BAYSIDE. It does not purport to show other i mpro ve- ments or encroachments . Scale: Date 111 = 50' 3-17 -87 o Iron marker COFFIN & GRONBERG, I NC . ./lu/./.&/-c:y Mark S. Gronberg Lie No. Engineers, Land Surveyors Planners Long Lake, Minnesota 12755 & ··-·-····· ---------------· ,.z ./' I -<~, ti' ... ... -~:i"-' v./' . ~ Q----------------~-:-- °' IV 97° I 50./9 "' 4 i'I 0o Cou 0 t-1 Raa..J No. B"f ~ (') Building L]catian Survey fo r Janes 8 . Maus i n Lot 2 , Block 1, Burge r 's Bays is e Hennepi n Cou nty, Min ne sota --=-=--· . ' Q) ' <:i <:o ' ,, ., . \ ·a ~ :! J.O. s .; ~ ·! 0 ~ .... :. '.,:· ,. . ,.. .., .:7.C'" :· '" . _. __ ,,,.. Ji ! I '<·,~·· '.. ·...:._----r;;,;·.~ ;: ,::-j ,,j 'l .::=:/ ~ - I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the location of four bujldings in relation to the South and East l i ne s of Lot 2, Bl oc k i , BURGER'S BAYSIDE. It does not purport to show other impro ve- ments or encroach~ents. Scale: 1 11 : 50 I Date 3-17-87 o Iron marker l COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. ./Ju//~~ Lie No. 12755 Mark s. Gronberg Engineers, Land Surveyors & Planners I Long Lake, Minnesota ' I !/ w~sl/112 ol llE.ict r·;, or Su s-T -i.--. ·.1 J.:..; T :,n..,.....,,r,-,-.r.,.r>.J.; 7",. __ -·---·-. ...,_, -----~ ~-ll.'?-.23 +~-"l+ +~;~ ·· .:.. ....... , ...... ____ :..;:; :~ ~ --:: , :-::!:-..:~:...! r1i::1 c~ ~~ t ::, 5 0 Acre-" b u 1 /d Qb/e 5i T"'('.·--·-~· u 1 ~ fa ".[";q+,-;Y\: i"i,..l,"1 1.-:;n;:-:: ~ ·;.~~,o,-.,.... --·----···, ~repos ed ~u ~l ~!~~- -r.·•, I I . ~-- -~·. ,-:/') ·"' 1:· I .... ' Jo \ O ; ~ ··~.------J .. 6 :~ I~ 150'. ....... 5,t' 5ntd• ··.· F:J-·. ~. _.., ~lfl-~ I "' ~ i:..;. 148.5 . i --____ _:.1 , / ),, "' -------_ .... ~---.-.·~ - /~I / Cu1!1.rl/m o.r /• ~ovnf y ,f'oa:i do 8 4 os /-ravL.//1ci ' --J' N j I ~tr.J .3W'"'/f-) .:c,r :l nd r'l l r~n':!r :.,cm;::; ...,.5._~(;, ~-'.inn0so7-a Scale: J,:\ !:,e 0 l !I -"'ri•'""' t -,,_v , .. : /.-,~-77 Iron :'.'..'.ir!.cer To: Jeanne Mabusth, Planning & Zoning Administrator From: Steve Weckman Date: April 5, 1991 Subject: Septic System Evaluation for the Proposed Addition at 3700 Bayside Road SYSTEM SIZE AND CONDITION The existing septic system was installed in 1970 and a permit was issued. The tanks and drainfield are believed to be undersized, but little is known regarding the system construction. It is expected that the system met the City Code at the time of installation but does not meet the current Code. Inspections since 1982 have revealed no evidence that septic system is not functioning properly. The proposed addition to the house is not expected to have an adverse impact on the septic system. The addition will not encroach on the septic system as the expansion will be to the north and the system is to the southwest of the house. The addition consists of a family room and a loft area only. As the expansion does not indicate the addition of a bedroom, the system is not expected to encounter any increase in usage. If at some time in the future the loft area is converted to a legal bedroom, the septic system would have to be reevaluated at that time. The septic system should continue to function satisfactorily based on current usage and system condition, therefore no system upgrades should be required. lsv ff •\ ;, INSPECTION RECORD DATE COMPLIANCE /Z-Z--8,'i!.-/vos,,d!.fAC(NC, /\JoTm:) 2. S-2S -83 µ, S:i.,f/,Zr/!C/,..,G 'lo~---- .lttvontl!Jt2 -rwv J:::. :) 2 ------- 11 ·7-)$'> NC> $V€Fl".C<"-'j t,.)<;.,.-e:Q 2 ._u -~7 ,'\Jo ,S:v .'Zr-A-c,,u,1 No :El? ,.., "'-- 'Z.. ~ ~ ,• PUMPOUT RECORD DATE GALLONS 1_ e,e, <?-Jo /__~--00 2000 ( ( I \ I I I rl " ()tf ~3 I • LOCATION KETCH !- ~1,v 0 I? I I 1' efi" v:J v>,-:,'D 2'-/ t123b --~: ? C -CONFORMING S -SUBSTANDARD N -NONCONFORMING .',· 1 ... .. ~.;·~ ;·;\·:· . ~-)•!'. ' ... ? ·• ··.:;" '.\'} ; .. - ',;'·'; ~ I • ,\~~:; 'i •> '·!,J ,.::t:-' . ;r·>. 'r. !,,' ~-i. ,_.·: ~I I jlnclude : ' ( 1) Well location 2) Distance from house to septic tanks, dist . box, and drainfield 3) North arrow and road EA'f st Pe ,e.J:>, J,, { :·'. ,·. ' 1) /'. : -t :\· ;, :'{ -· ii;, ,, .•. ,. 1:, . •Sf, ~ ,~. ·-~· t) ~{ . ·., ,;., •}:·. ,,· .··: , .\ tJ f ~ . I : · .. · ! · . .:-:.---...... :. •;-· --:: · ....... ~ .. -."::;: -· . -. ··.· ,:. - -~-~-...:. ""--~-:...:·-~~---:--,:r~~-~-~-. --~ - i I .. __ ., ... , . ~ . . . -----·------·------·-- i· j• ., .-.-:.+-------------Jr= ,;v, ~;;:· ··-=--~ LC-'--:---~ .. -~_-_,_-, -··: ___ ·._-_ -.. , ' 1, .:..:·::_ .. _ .. l i 1 I ·&~~\~ ,_ _ .. :-:·;;-__. .. ~~: .. ; > !>· ... ___ ·,;. --~~--= ·---~ :~ ·-\ \ ·-;:.·· --~ ..... --.-..... ::.-.. · 1 . \ ?<~~~j/' -. -·· ~ . /"il' 1.. L -rQ cJ -\j (1';,<Q~ Q1j~J l.66t t l l:ldl/ ~ } 1 ·-=_.--~-. 1 ~-(~ 1J_-. J ',::t:1~:~.~ J1.1 /{ I I h•J.r\. ~Vy \ '\ _/ ~" I 1~1_.__, __ ----~ ---~I ----=-=·-__ -__ -__ -_-_ ---, •.J ' /\ -i l -\\~Q /\ -----··-------- //--~"- --·-------·· ---·---:--i·--·- r 1--= :::-__ _ ·--------------~-----------------.. --------· --------------------------, --------------- \J \ 0 \ r.1 . !.; ,,.. ... ' ~., .\ .j;' ·H: ·t; '. '•l'I•. J ' I . ,·.i : ---·--·; .c-.;•·.:. :.:-. •-•· -,:--:--,· __ .· •. ·..,._ -';:or·-., .. : -.--· .. : . .-_ \ .. --·~_.:. ... -..--:_-:~ \ltf-i;l \ ~'~}-~ tt::_:,; :''.'t -~,.-:)/: ~/: .·:·-·.·' , --~ -. ~~~~~~~~~$ ~ilfGttif r_. ··; ~-~--: _..: ·-·. -~··~ -~ __ : ....... _ : .. -:,.:.-: .. ;. -: -._ .... _ .. ,,. ..... _.,,,..;.;r.-,...--~-~~ -_,.._ .. _ ... -... ~,. ~>-~].:·,'.~;:p-:~~:~~i,-i ~i~:-;7 ,··. -\··_._ ,.-_--._ -.. -.-:-:.,;r.-_! --·· •.• --... : -· ........ . ~~ . . . -· .. . ·-·· ..... -.---~ . :-.. ·--........ . ~-i:~~~i~ff~-~~:8f1:~_~-~. ~-.::.-;.,_.;_...., .... ------..----.~ .-:::~· _:-::;;:;:---: ~ ~---~---- CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. ) CITY OF ORONO ) I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1634, was mailed to the attached list of property owners • In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 28th day of March, 1991. CITY OF ORONO -NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold Public Hearings in the Council Chambers at 1275 .South Brown Road on Monday, April 15, 1991 for the purpose of reviewing the following land use applications: 1. #1631 Charles and Ann Hommeyer have filed a renewal variance for lot area for the property located at 475 Linden Avenue for the purpose of constructing a new residence. 2. #1632 Steve Martin has filed a renewal conditional use permit for duplex use of the property located at 3890 Shoreline Drive. 3. #1633 Andrew McDermott of 2702 Walters Port Lane seeks approval of a rear setback variance for construction of a 3-season porch addition to the rear of the residence structure. 4. #1634 James and Joan Maus of 3700 Bayside Road seek approval of a side setback variance for a proposed two-story addition to the east side of the existing residence. 5. #1635 John O'Sullivan and Erwin Smith of 2420 Shadywood Road seek approval of a side setback variance for a proposed storage/utility addition to the east side of the existing commercial structure. 6. #1636 Steve Tibbetts, current owner of 1810 Shadywood Road, seeks approval of after-the-fact hardcover and setback variances for deck additions and installation of an access drive. 7. #1637 Spring Hill Land Company, owner of the former Spring Hill Conference Center located at 725 6th Avenue North, seeks approval of a conditional use permit for a church use of portions of the existing facility and a variance that would allow the present profit-making corporation to use the facility for conference use on a temporary basis. 8. #1638 City of Orono seeks approval of setback variances and a variance to the allowed area for oversized accessory structures for the property located at 1285 Brown Road South for the purpose of installing temporary storage/maintenance structure on the residential property. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. The meeting starts at 7:00 p.rn. Written comments are solicited. Plans are available for review in the City offices, by appointment. City of Orono By: Planning Commission Jean A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator To be published the week of April 1, 1991. CITY OF ORONO -NOTICE The Planning Comm ission will hold Public ~earings ~_:!_h~~-l!!lCif .~Chambers _ au 275 _ ;2; 3outh Brown Road on Monday, April 15, 1991 _ .... ;. for the purpose of reviewing the following land use applications : L No. 1631 Charles and Ann Hommeyer have filed a renewal variance for lot area for the property located at 4 75 Linden Avenue for . the purpose of constructing a new residence . 2. No. 1632 Steve Martin has filed a renew- al conditional use permit for duplex use of the property located at 3890 Shoreline Drive. 3 . No. 1633 Andrew McDermott of. 2702 Walters Port Lane seeks approval of a rear set-__ , back variance for construction of a 3-season porch addition to the rear of' the residence - structure. .. . 4. No. 1634 James and Joan Maus of 3700 Bayside Road seek approval of a side setback variance for a proposed two-story addition to ~ the east side of .the existing ~esidence. "'.' ~ '. _'. 5 . No . 1635 John O 'Sullivan and Erwin Smith · --• of 2420 Shadywood Road seek approval of a side setback variance for a proposed storage/utility addition to the east side of the ... J existing commerciat structure . ·., -- 6. No . 1636 Steve Tibbetts, current owner of 1810 Shadywood Road , seeks approv,jl'of after-the-fact hardcover and setback variances for deck additions and installation of an access drive . • --·; 7 . No . 1637 ~pring Hjll .land Co~~;.; o~n-· ·: er of the former Spring Hill Conference Center -s located at 725 6th Avenue North , seeks ap- proval of a conditional use permit for a church use of portions of the existing facility and a var- iance that would allow .the present profit-• _, making corporation to use the facility for con-:· .... ference use on a temporary basis . . . .• • , 8 . No . 1638 City of Orono seeks approval : of setback variances and a variance to the al- lowed area for oversized accessory structures ·_ • for the property .located at 1285 Brown Road .. . : South for the purpose of instalflng temporary ··· -,J storage/maintenance structure on the residen- tial property. ·· ' ' · · · · • ' · All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time . The meeting starts at 7 :00 p .m. Written comments are solicited . Plans are avail- able for review in the City offices. by appoint· ment. ··• .... / . .L.; ·,. ~ -· City of Orono By : Planning Com~ission ,0 ·,, •• .;, "· ~.=-,,;:.~, • Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Adminiii: . ·:. trator -·•~-· .. · ., _._..,., (Published in _ The Laker and Pioneer April 1, 1991) · .. , i ... • .. , .... , __ ,.,_ ... --·· ., -., ' •• ;" ' ~~ ..... i Affidavit of Publication State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin . Bill Holm , being duly sworn , on oath says that he is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER , Mound . Min- nesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: A.) The newspaper has complied with all the require- ments constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07, and other applicable laws , as amended . 8 .) The printed ' J:.i!.41L /I ul J<.Ci:-<'.L -=-_) , i/ -:; ./' I 1 fl "-< &'(_,,r 7 r.t:. vL~ which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week for successive weeks : It was first published Monday, th A-st-d f ; 7 ._u,J~./ 19 9 / e __ ay o fnfe _, and was thereafter prin ed and published every Monday, to and including Monday, the __ day of MARIETTA A. STRAUS NOT,>.RY PUBLIC CARVER COUNTY MY COMMISS IO N EXP IRE S :.-1-96 19_; thorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to me on this ' of~ 19-2!__. °'--day By: ~~ 0 ~ Notary Public Rate Information ( 1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for compara- ble space : '10.40 per inch . (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter: $10.40 per inch . (3) Rate actually charged for above matter: $5.48 per inch . Each additional successive week: $3.66 per inch I (we) have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 3 ·700 BA y.S,oE Qt;>. also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Date Date ************************************** have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at ??70 0 '.~6 ~,s i J.,L_ .E<..J, also referred to as Land Use Application No. . " · I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare-approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Pro~rty Owner Dat~ If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ~ ·• ' ' I ?1 , f!/ .. ~- DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with M.S. 13.04, Subd. 2, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. ~~ou are notified that: .,..,;;,.,_ .... 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 to review private data on yourself. 6.;~· our ull name is required to process this application or permi. /7 ./7.-/ ~~ (.,? / ,rt--L-------- ~st ~le /Jl{<fti» Zip Phone I understand my rights as stated above. ------------------------- Sl3.0;4 RIGHTS OF SUBJECTS OF DATA Subdivision 1. Type of data. The rights of individuals on whom the data is stored or to be stored shall be as set forth in this section. Subd. 2. Information required to be given individuaL An. individual esked to · supply private or confidential data concerning himself shall be informed of: (a) the purpose and intended use of the requested data within the collecting state agency, political subdivision, or statewide system; (b) whether he may refuse or is legally required to supply the requested data; (c) any known consequence arising from his supplying or refusing to supply private or confidential data.; and (d) the identity of other persons or entities authorized by state or federal law to receive the data. This_ requirement shall not apply when an individual is asked to supply investigative data, pursuant to section 13.82, subdivision 5, to a law enforcement officer. The commissioner of revenue ma lace the notice re uired under this subdivision in the individual income tax or orooertv tax re und instructions instead o on those forms. -Subd. 3 •. ··· Access to data by ·· individuaL Upon request to a responsible authority, an individual shall be informed whether he is the subject of stored data on individuals; and whether it is classified as public, private or confidential. Upon his further request, an individual who is the subject of stored private or public data on individuals shall be shown the data without any charge to him and, if he desires, shall Se informed of the content and meaning of that data.. After an individual has been shown the private data and inf crmed of its meaning, the data. need not be disclosed to him for six months thereafter unless a dispute or action pursuant to this section is pending or additional data on the individual has been collected or created. The · responsible authority shall provide copies of the private or public data upon request by the individual subject of the data. The responsible authority may require the requesting person to pay the actual costs of making, certifying, and compiling the copies. The responsible authority shall comply immediately, i! possible, with any request made pursuant to this subdivision, or within five days of the date of the request, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays, if · immediate compliance is not possible. If he cannot comply with the request within that time, he shall so inform the individual, and may have an additional five days within which to comply with the request, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays. ---. Subd. 4. Procedure when data is not accurate or complete. An individual may contest the accuracy or completeness ·of public or private data concerning himself. To exercise this right, an individual shall notify in writing the responsible authority describing the nature of the disagreement. The responsible authority .shall within 3 0 days either: (a) correct the data found to be inaccurate or incomplete and attempt to notify past recipients of inaccurate or incomplete data, including recipients named by the individual; or {b) notify the individual that he believes the data to be correct. Data in dispute shall be disclosed only if the individual's statement cf disagreement is included with the disclosed data. . The determination of the responsible authority may be appealed pursuant to the provisions ~f the administrative procedure act relating to contested cases. !-;. F ROM: DANRICH CONSTRUCTION DAN HOOPS 1275 170 th ST. SHAKOPEE, MN. 55379 TO:CITY OF ORONO JEANNE MABUSTH P.O. EO X 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN. 55323 DEAR JEANNE, A.FRI L :-:, 199 1 ----- PER OUR DISCUSSION IN THE CITY OFFICES, 3-26, YOU HAD ASKED THAT I SEND YOU A LETTER AS A REMINDER YOU OF OUR CON VERSATION. IN OUR CONVERSATION, I HAD ASKED YOU IF YOU THOUGHT THAT IT WAS AT ALL POSSIBLY TO, WITH THE SIMPLICITY OF THE MAUS FILE, THAT WE HAVE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE 15th AND THEN HAND CARRY TO THE COUNCIL MEETING OF THE 22nd OF APRIL. YOUR REPLY WAS THAT THERE WAS SOME POSSIBILITY. PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT THIS IS NOT A LETTER OF PERSUASION ONLY TO ASK FOR A REASON OF SIMPLICITY. JEANNE ANY ASSISTANCE IN THIS IS APPRECIATED. IF YOU SHOULD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT MYSELF, DAN HOOPS OR THE MAUS' AT THE NUBERS BELOW MAUS NUMBER IS 476-6153 ~u ~ DAN Hoo ! DANRICH CONSTRUCTION 445-3583 r \......:....-I -·~ -. Building Location Sur ve y for J ames 8. Maus in Lot 2, Block 1, Burger's Baysi de Hennepin County, Minnesota ---=-..:.-· l \.~ it ~X..' rP -v~~ 0 ~ if'" " .. ., ,; ' ... : , .... ; "' ·"""' ~ : .. ":Jv··· .,e:; ;'::! ~::,: C:/1'' -·-. -------· 21..Z I .... ... ~ -~ -_v.; _ -----~ -------~-- ,,, 4 I'\ /'-197° I 50. 19 ~~-00--~~C~ouory RoQd No. 81 ; ~ ' ' I ,, ,, . I J,O, -;'~ rr.)1'r:_~ ti:1 i '( 1·.,1 ,,.,.:"-- •. ! ., i '-<~./ , .. ''· r·:-. _.)J -~~ I hereby certify that this is a true and correct repres en tation of a survey of the location of four bujldings in relation to the South and East lin es of Lot 2, Block t, BURGER'S BAYSIDE. It does not purport to show other i mprove - men ts or en croachm ents . Scale: 1 11 : 50 I Date 3-17-87 o Iron marker COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. ,/Ju//~-<;; Mark S. Gronberg Lie No. Engineers, Land Surveyors Planners Long Lake, Minnesota 12755 & .• .i •. ~. ·• ·•i . , . I·, • I' '' .,,.,: 1 I ., ••• :· :i.'/ '·',; '/•,; Vt (· ·!} ·,. ·'· . , ., ·.'{ l.,· .,... ____ .._ ____ ...... _...,._....., _ _,_ ______ . . ~UT~t ~LE-Vt.--TIOkl . 6(.,..,, e · ye;,·~.1·-0· \ . . i'.!· :, ... . :i .·. ?I ,I . ·_,.,: ' .';'!-· :j . ','.) ~t-J"T : ed;,( ~~:, . --··-----.. _ .. _______ .. ,,-<,--~---'------='-..-----~~ -). '• '··:~.; .s B l -----, .• ..... -.. ,-..... -·-··----- ', ':i; ;\;: ltii r;{ . 'i . \j,)c; :.i~· § ii< ,;; ~:{::1 i . . ~ ~; ~::. : .i {~t~ :;·. ·!,··) ', ~;' ',. J ,;. ' .. . t .·i ,·· ~ i i . :~ ., ':: !i : < . I \,