HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketCITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
952.249.4600
TO: Robert S. Snyder
1513 Bay Ridge Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
TYPE OF APPLICATION:
DATE OF MEETING:
Variances
August 8, 2011
ZONING FILE: 11-3516
NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: August 9, 2011
COPIES:
VOTE: 4 FOR 0 AGAINST
Motion: To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution previously mailed to you .
Please arrange to sign the original resolution at the City Offices (Please note: The City is
now on a summer schedule. Monday through Thursday 7:30 -5 PM & Friday, 7:30 to
11 :30). All persons with an interest in the property must sign the resolution.
Variance approval is limited to the extent shown on approved plan and as noted in the
approval resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to further review by the City .
Variance approval expires one year after date of approval. A building permit must be obtained
no later than August 8, 2012 .
If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes , they are available from the City
Clerk after review and approval by the City Council.
If you have questions please contact Melanie Curtis, Planning & Zoning Coordinator, at
mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us or 952 .249.4627.
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, August 8, 2011
7:00 o'clock p.m.
*7. #11-3516 ROBERTS. Sl\rvDER, 1513 BAY RIDGE ROAD -VARIANCE-
RESOLUTION NO. 6065
Rahn moved, Printup seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6065, a Resolution Granting a
Variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-305 for the property located at 1513 Bay Ridge
Road. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
ITY ENGINEER'S REPORT
APPROVE FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENT OF GRINDER STATION #1 (2635 NORT
DRIVE)
Printup seconded, to accept the quotatioll'in the amount of $5,000 from Ge' mger
of Watkins, Minnesota, for force main replacement at GS#l. VOTE: es 4,
*9. T SEWER EXTENSION PROJECT
Rahn moved, Printup s onded, to award the contract in the amount of ,725.00 from RPU, Inc.,
for completion of the Fox reet Extension project with project fundi . 'paid by the property owner
at 3125 Fox Street who has ecuted a special assessment agreemen OTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0 .
10. CHANGE ORDER NO. -NORTH FARM ROADS , TARY SEWER PROJECT
Kellogg stated this is a project that was rted last fall and is ,' a neighborhood located on the south side
of County Road 6. It has a private road. · hty percent of e property owners petitioned to have this
project move forward , so the Council approv the proj c?.' and a pressure system was installed. The
assessments were adopted last fall. Total costs the oject came in under the estimate slightly.
Rahn asked in regards to the extra piping to prote
better idea as the project was being completed.
Kellogg stated each property is served by he main trunk was installed along one
side of the road . There were more prop ies on one side of the ad than the other but that it made more
sense to put the main on the other sid f the road due to some wet d issues . Prior to the construction,
the City has information on where , septic systems are located and · office estimates where the
property owner might likely hoo p to sewer on their property.
Kellogg stated as in other pr ects , the property owners in this neighborhood d the option to dictate
where they wanted the cu stop on their property. The added length of pipe is relocation of the
service from where the~ ere originally shown on the plans. There was one prope located in the cul-
de-sac area that had t rr curb stop depicted in one location but was moved approxim ly 50 feet due to
an uncertainty of w re the curb stop was going to go.
intup seconded, to approve Change Order No. 1 for the North Farm Ro
ayers, in the amount of $1,905. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
Page 13 of 21 -·-----------------
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, July 18, 2011
6:30 o'clock p.m.
Sch nzeit asked whether there has been any communication with the neighbors or a schedule sub
the trucking.
the Council will issue the conditional use permit and then an administra ·
· ch requires the applicants to submit a trucking schedule.
Leskinen noted the engineer's repo
Keenan Paulucci stated he had nothin
applicant calculating the area to be disturbed
that permit. Curtis noted there is quite a steep
rger than one acre. The applicant has demonstrated
ents regarding this application.
sed the public hearing at 7:16 p.m.
Thiesse m ed, Levang seconded, to recommend approval of Application #11-3515, enan &
Sveive n behalf of Gina Paulucci, 320 Woodhill Road, subject to the City Engineer's
mendations. VOTE; Ayes 6, Nays 0.
5. #11-3516 ROBERT SNYDER, 1513 BAY RIDGE ROAD, VARIANCE, 7:17 P.M. -7:36
P.M.
Tripp and Pam Snyder, Applicants, were present
Curtis stated the applicant is requesting a side setback variance to allow a garage addition to the home .
The addition consists of 966 square feet and is propo9sed to be located eight feet from the south lot line
where a 30-foot setback is required. The existing home is set back eight from the south lot line so it does
not meet the 30-foot principal structure side setback required within the LR-lA zoning district. The
addition to the home in the proposed location within the substandard setback is considered an expansion
of an existing nonconformity. A side yard setback is required in order to do the project as proposed.
Additionally, the applicant is proposing reductions in hardcover within the 75-250 foot zone in order to
accommodate the addition and remain at 25 percent.
The applicant's property is nonconforming with respect to area and width. The existing home does not
meet the required 30-foot side setback on either side lot line . The applicant is proposing a 26-foot deep
garage addition to the home in order to achieve additional living space . The proposed garage addition
within the substandard side setback area will not encroach closer than the existing home to the adjacent
Page8
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, July 18, 2011
6:30 o'clock p.m.
property, but the length of the encroachment will nearly double. An existing shed set back five feet from
the side lot line along the existing garage is proposed to be removed as part of this project.
The applicant's variance may be reasonable considering the location of the existing home on the property .
The proposed addition will result in 26 feet of additional massing along the south lot line. There are a
number of trees along the south side of the property which may afford adequate screening of the addition
from the adjacent property. Staff finds the location of the existing home and the width of the applicant's
property creates a unique circumstance not created by the applicant and that granting the applicant's
request is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the ordinance and will not alter the essential
character of the neighborhood.
In order to construct the addition, hardcover removals are necessary. The applicant has provided a
hardcover plan which results in a conforming level of hardcover. However, while the proposed driveway
meets the City's minimum standards, the configuration appears to be difficult to maneuver. The applicant
should address the proposed driveway configuration.
Issues for consideration:
1. A 10-foot setback is the minimum principal structure side setback permitted in any zoning
district. Should the addition be redesigned and constructed to meet a 10-foot side setback?
2. The applicant is proposing a driveway configuration which technically meets the City's driveway
hardcover minimum. However, there appears to be maneuverability difficulties .
Staff recommends approval of a side setback variance in order to construct the garage addition and
conduct hardcover removals as proposed. The Planning Commission should consider and make a
recommendation on whether an 8-foot setback is acceptable or if a 10-foot setback should be required.
--
Tripp Snyder, Applicant, indicated they purchased the house approximately four years ago . Shortly after
the purchase the interior of the house was rewired to bring it up to code . As part of that renovation, the
hardcover was reduced on the property from approximately 35 percent in the 75 -250 foot zone to
approximately 31. 7 percent. They are further proposing to reduce it down to just under 25 percent.
The garage that is being proposed sits on what is now 100 percent hardcover. The portico would also sit
on 100 percent hardcover. Snyder indicated the structures they are proposing will not add any hardcover
whatsoever to the property. Along the south side of the property there is concrete along with a shed that
is approximately three feet wide . That will be removed as part of the construction. Snyder indicated they
have attempted to get under the 25 percent hardcover requirement, which is accomplished with this
proposal.
Snyder stated they are removing all of the hardcover that is currently used for excess parking. That area
could also be used as a turnaround. Bayridge Road is a private road with seven houses on the road . Their
house is next to the last house on the road and is located approximately 60 feet from the end of the road.
The two spaces in the proposed garage that are to the south are the ones that will be primarily used .
Snyder stated in his view due to the configuration that their builder and surveyor have proposed they feel
that both cars can be turned around adequately in that portion of the driveway or they could back down
the driveway. At the far north portion of the driveway you will not be able to turn around. Snyder stated
----Page9
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, July 18, 2011
6:30 o'clock p.m.
they plan on using the third space as kind of an overflow parking when they have guests at the house and
also to store the riding lawn mower and snow blower. Snyder noted there is very little traffic on the road.
The house next to this house is for sale so there are some prospective people coming to look at it but there
are perhaps four to five cars every day that go past their house . Every lot on the road is 100 feet wide
lots.
Schoenzeit asked whether he has discussed this project with the neighbors.
Snyder indicated he has spoken to one of the neighbors but that the other neighbor is seldom at the
property . The fence that is located on the neighbor's property line is in a state of disintegration and
should be taken down . They are proposing to replace that fence with a series of shrubs that would grow
to a height of eight or nine feet and provide screening between the two houses . Snyder indicated they
have not discussed that proposal with the neighbor.
Leskinen asked whether any attempt was made to comply with the encroachment.
Snyder stated technically they are in the two acre zone so the side setback requirement is 30 feet.
Physically it is possible to move the garage over a foot and a half, which would put it at the 10 foot line,
but where it comes into the existing house is into the kitchen. If it is moved over another foot and a half,
they would be infringing up a bay window , which would require a redesign of the whole front side of the
house .
Thiesse asked if someone would come to visit the property if the expectation is that they would
completely back out of the driveway.
Snyder pointed out the road and the edge of the road. Snyder indicated they do have an area where guests
can park.
Feuss asked if there would be any additional hardcover in the area for the guests .
Snyder indicated that area would be grass .
Thiesse stated as it relates to moving the garage over another foot and a half, in his view it would really
not serve any purpose since the house is already there .
Schoenzeit asked if they are restricted from putting a jog in the structure .
Curtis indicated they are not.
Schoenzeit asked if the exterior of the garage would be compatible with what currently exists .
Thiesse asked how much of the concrete located on the south side will be removed.
Snyder indicated they will be removing 100 percent of that. There currently is brick pavement and
plantings with plastic and rock, which will also be removed .
Schoenzeit asked whether there will be gutters or drain spouts on the garage.
-------Page
10
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, July 18, 2011
6:30 o'clock p.m.
Snyder indicated there are gutters all the way along the house. It currently is a fairly gradual slope but
they will be making the area a little bit flatter or perhaps swale it.
Schoenzeit stated in his view it is important that the runoff from the garage stay on the applicant's
property .
Snyder concurred.
Curtis indicated the City Engineer will be reviewing that.
Levang noted the area was very wet when she visited the site.
Snyder stated they have a sprinkler system that comes on twice a week and that it may have been on
yesterday morning . With the high humidity, nothing dried out. Snyder indicated there will be gutters all
the way along the entire house. Snyder pointed out the area on the property where the swale is currently
located and stated that can be extended if necessary.
Curtis noted the City Engineer will look at the drainage and will make recommendations on how to
mitigate any adverse impacts to the neighbor.
Chair Schoenzeit opened the public hearing at 7:32 p.m.
There were no public comments regarding this application.
Chair Schoenzeit closed the public hearing at 7:32 p.m.
Feuss stated she likes the reduction in the hardcover. The applicant already has the existing
nonconformity and that there are practical difficulties given the small lot size .
Schwingler commented this proposal would also clean up the concrete and the little shed.
Thiesse noted the only affected property would be the property that is up for sale and that to his
knowledge the seller is not aware of the proposal.
Curtis stated the owner was notified.
Sny der stated the property has been for sale for the past three years.
Schoenzeit moved, Feuss seconded, to recommend approval of Application #11-3516, 1513 Bay
Ridge Road , granting of a side setback variance to allow a garage addition to the home subject to
Staff's recommendations.
Schoenzeit encouraged the applicant to construct an appropriate sized turnaround.
Snyder indicated if they add more to the turnaround , they would be over the 25 percent hardcover.
Feuss commented that would then require them to come back for a hardcover variance.
Page
11
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, July 18, 2011
6:30 o'clock p.m.
Thiesse stated the hardcover requirements are primarily to protect the lake and that the water in this area
will not be going into the lake. Thiesse stated he would understand if they had to come back for a
hardcover variance .
Feuss stated that ultimately is their choice.
NG COMMISSION COMMENTS
6. RE ORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVES ATTENDING
CO CIL MEETINGS ON JUNE 27, 2011, AND JULY 11, 2011
Feuss noted she a ded the June 27th City Council meeting and all items were placed
Agenda.
Levang stated she attende the July 11 111 meeting and reported that the Whipple plication that was
approved by the Planning C ission variance was not approved by the Ci Council. The Whipple
property is located on Casco P · t Road .
Curtis displayed the proposed garag
difficulty to ask for a garage of that size .
beyond that.
Curtis stated the conversation of the Planni
uld be used for and that the Planning
ntered more around the level of hardcover.
Levang stated the garage would be use o store antique cars an s such would be a luxury. The City
Council did not feel the hardcover w reduced enough. The City ouncil also talked about a deck
located out front but was not disc ed in great detail.
Curtis noted the deck was on
Levang stated she would e to use this as a learning tool in the future so the
overrule the Planning mmission on other similar applications. Levang noted t
eventually tabled.
Curtis stated tha pplicant has submitted a revised plan today requesting 30 percent har
was a signific tin the driveway and a slight reduction in the size of the garage.
As it rela to the issues with the 0-75 foot zone and the nonconforming structure, Council Me er Rahn
had ser d on the Planning Commission before the statutes were changed. If the City requires the
rem al of a nonconforming structure , the City would be required to compensate the property owner.
-------------Page
12
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM
I (we) V~b// U1F~/J'Jd J
[print name(s)]
• )lave ~view:\ the pl? for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at /~Af dlltj &!__ fXJt &',61 1so referred to as Land Use Application No . ___ _
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or
disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the
improvement lans and that the proposed neighbor's pr 1ect or use requires Council approval.
Date
Property Owner Date
*********************************************************************************************************************************
I (we) Uiv\ t-Tlv~ l ~ b~~of_.__}57._0 ___ (_&,,--rJ-A_k_,__"--< #}_
[print name(s)] [print add~-
have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at
_________ also referred to as Land Use Application No. ___ _
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or
disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the
improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Ao~~ oa~b /tJ
Property Owner
i,-~0, {p
Date
If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use
Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10
days prior to the scheduled meeting date .
-14 -
Date Application Received: 06/22/11
Date Application Considered as Complete : 06/28/11
60-Day Review Period Expires: 08/27 /11
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date : 2 August 2011
Item No .
Department Approval: 1~ ~ { J Administrator Apprdo I: Agenda Section:
Name: Melanie Curtis \\J\IV
Title: Planning & Zoning Coordinator
Item Description: #11-3516, Robert "Tripp" Snyder, 1513 Bay Ridge Road,
Side Setback Variance -Resolution
Zoning District: LR-lA, One Family Lakeshore Residential, 2-acres/200'
Lot Area: 0.96 acre/ 42,096 square feet
Lot Width: 100'
List of Exhibits:
Exhibit A. Site Plan
Exhibit B. Draft Resolution
Exhibit C. PC Report -07 /13/11
Exhibit D. Draft PC Minutes -07 /18/11
Application Summary:
The applicant is requesting a side yard setback variance to permit a 966 square foot garage addition to the
existing home. The addition is proposed to be 8.4 feet from the south lot line where a 30-foot setback is
required. The addition to the home in the proposed location within the substandard setback is considered an
expansion of an existing nonconformity; a side yard setback variance is required in order to do the project as
proposed. The applicant is also proposing reductions in hardcover within the 75' -250' zone in order to
accommodate the addition and remain at 25% hardcover.
Planning Commission Recommendation
On July 18, the Planning Commission voted 6 to Oto recommend approval of the variance to allow an 8.4-foot
side setback.
Planning Staff Recommendation
Planning Staff recommends approval of a side setback variance in order to construct the garage addition and
conduct hardcover removals as proposed. In the Planning Commission report, Staff suggested approving a 10-
foot setback rather than the requested 8.4-foot setback in order to maintain at least a 10-foot separation
between the new addition and the south lot line. The Planning Commission did not find value in requiring a
1.6-foot jog in the building to meet a 10-foot setback when the existing home was already set back 8.4-feet .
Based on the Planning Commission recommendation, Staff has drafted a resolution approving an 8.4-foot
setback.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
The Council should consider adopting or amending the attached draft resolution granting a 8.4-foot setback
for the addition.
t
i
I I r,· J I v
I/~ I i ~
I
rJ
r_. -_;
\ .
/"'\ v' v,·
\
I
I
Q
946.54
94E20
I
I
I
I
-.... ~ 7 7.5
I , J {.__·.) ·'\_~· ~~v . ~· . b maale 4 tree t:f m
' X
947.48
X 946,83
• 947. 13
X 945. 74
L£G£ND
948.
250' FROM OHltt. -···, ..
\
\ >
I
I 953.76
K
I
Ex. House
FF.£/ev
=951.12
n ov
I\ '.)
\
Ex. House
X 953.55
I
• 953.01
/ % 950.58
• 950.37
/
I
-X---4--X~~-+-i I -··-·
I /
f
/· .. . -rence. 940_ 62
75' FROM OHWL -···°"·.
\
\
~ 944.01 >.
• 941.40 .. ·1 /
/ : //
I
... I
/ :
! ... -···-···-···/··· \., ..
. ·, ... ,
···,... I
I'·-., "'-I
I ···, ...
'···
'··-~6' I •,.
'···, ... , .. ·, .. )
I
I
I
I
!···, ···, ...
'· ·· .......... 6'6'
'···,
.,.,,. ... --···-····
,/···
/
./
i O·
A RESOLUTION
GRANTING A VARIANCE TO
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 78-305
FILE NO. 11-3516
WHEREAS, Robert Snyder and Pamela Kroeger Snyder, a married couple
(hereinafter "the Applicants ") are the owners of the property located at 1513 Bay Ridge Road
within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows: Tract H and
Tract K, Registered Land Survey No. 192 , Hennepin County , Minnesota (hereinafter the
"Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a
variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-305(B) to allow construction of an
addition to the existing home resulting in an 8.4-foot setback on the south side of the home
where 30-foot side yard setbacks are normally required and an 8.4-foot setback currently exists;
and
WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes and the Orono , Minnesota, City Code, the Orono Planning Commission held
a public hearing on July 18 , 2011 at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this
application were given the opportunity to speak thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 11-3516.
2. The property is located in the LR-IA One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning
District which requires a minimum lot area of 2.0 acres and a minimum lot width
of200 '.
Page 1 of 5
3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on
July 18, 2011 and recommended approval of a side setback variance based on the
following findings:
a. The property contains 42,096 s.f. (0.96 acre) in area and has 110-feet in width .
b. Sanitary sewer is available.
c. There is no additional land available to bring the lot area into conformity.
d. Adjusting the proposed addition to meet a 10-foot side setback would create
awkward design challenges and offer minimal benefit to the adjacent property
owner.
e. Additional vegetative screening is proposed.
f. The Applicants are proposing reductions in hardcover within the 75'-250'
zone to reach a conforming 25% hardcover level.
g. The Applicants' request will not alter the essential character of the
neighborhood and will result in minimal negative impact on adjacent
properties.
h . The Applicants ' request is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the
ordinance.
1. The driveway as proposed meets the City's minimum standards although the
configuration is acknowledged by the Applicants to be somewhat limiting ,
hence it is likely to be used primarily for storage.
J. The Applicants have demonstrated that enforcing the lot area and lot width
provisions of the Zoning Ordinance deprive the applicant of the reasonable
use of their property.
4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by
the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the
health, safety and welfare of the community.
Page 2 of 5
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to
it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting
the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions , light , air nor pose a fire
hazard or other danger to neighboring property ; would not merely serve as a
convenience to the applicant , but is necessary to alleviate a practical difficulty; is
necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant ; and would be in
keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of
the City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings , the Orono City Council hereby grants
variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-305 (B) to allow construction of an
addition to the existing home resulting in a 8.4-foot setback on the south side of the where a 30-
foot side yard setback is normally required and an 8.4-foot setback currently exists, subject to the
following conditions:
1. Council approval is based on the survey and building plans submitted by the Applicants
and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A & B. Any
amendments to the site plan which are not in conformity with City codes will require
further Planning Commission and City Council review.
2. No hardcover variances are granted. The Applicants must conduct hardcover removals in
order to achieve a conforming 25 hardcover level within the 75 '-250 ' zone. Hardcover
within the 250 ' -500 ' zone shall not increase above 30 .
3. The Applicants acknowledge the awkward configuration of the proposed driveway and
acknowledge that changes to the driveway resulting in hardcover in excess of 25 will
not be approved.
4. The Applicants shall submit a detailed drainage and grading plan with the building permit
application to ensure no negative impacts to the adjacent proeprty.
5. The Applicants shall submit a planting plan with the building permit application for
screening the proposed addition from the property to the south.
6. The building plans submitted for building permit will be reviewed to ensure compliance
with the City's building height and number of stories regulations .
Page 3 of 5
7 . Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the Applicants , but
are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new
construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be
completed within one year of the date of Council approval , or the variance will expire on
that date (August 8, 2012).
8. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution
shall constitute a violation of the zoning code , shall automatically terminate any authority
granted herein , and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
9. The undersigned Applicants have read , understand and hereby agree to the terms of this
resolution and on behalf of the Applicants and the Applicants ' heirs , successors and
assigns , hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the
property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 8th day of August , 2011.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Lili Tod McMillan, Mayor
Property Owner( s)
Page 4 of 5
ST A TE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
This instrument was acknowledged before me this_ day of _____ , 2011 , by
Robert Snyder, husband of Pamela Kroeger Snyder.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
Notary Public
This instrument was acknowledged before me this_ day of _____ , 2011 by ,
Pamela Kroeger Snyder, wife of Robert Snyder.
Notary Public
Page 5 of 5
I
f
I
i ,.,
I q'>'
/
~
~
I
LI
I
I
I
I
/ Q
I a
r l.11 '>
946.54
946.20
Cy
\
/"'\ v'
'(".
I
I
I
I
950.10 I
---~49.9
-~ • 950.1 6
'\
11 950.87
"!}50.73
250' FROM 0//111. -.. , ..
,-,
~.7
\
\
)'
I
I 953.16,
, 95J.J4
I
n
"~v
\
• 9SJ.55 • 953.01
/ « .950.58
/ /5037
b~ ' q
d"ns« / '/
.-.-952 :8 /. °'~49 )'
15.7±< tf}J9!57'37"W .fJB±/ / /'
'-;J()(].28 meas JOO,Ja·-RLS No. !1_2· ·
·1 I\ 11 .1±<.:· 'S52.68 • 952.JJ/ , '" < ,,,~ I .
-· 2 t1enchmarl< _ ... -. Q . , 951
68
/ .. ' 947.6<
{
topoft!I '\ 4• --.0 /
r'\ El•v-95";.;. casing .\ • 9~1.78·8 blrcl> • 951.1 1·
V ~"" "a) ./ I • ~ I ,·,,..-." l / --" · "'·" ,._,/ ~ 9.w./1
:/ /
,. 946.BJ
, 947.13
"948.74
052 (' •. \
1
~----. House .g~~ ,
H
"\.J;. \ ~," . =,;;.;. i I , e 2..--/ I
--,. ! -··-~·
"950.54
I
,, 1o ·ma1;J1t...
~ ·v
\)
rr=r
Ex. House
FT.£J~v
-951.12
/ I
• 94s./1
"941.-40
I
/
75' FROM OHltt. -··-.....
\
\
, 944.01 >.
\, ·-.,
··, ... , I
f'.. ··,.
I '·, '··,. 6. /y
I ·-,~ ......
LEGEND I
·, ·,
')
NTS
I
I
I
~
~
p~<r'7-11
0 tllJ ('fhO(A (\1e5
~ .
)>
Z44
. 1929) '/
~
bnck walls~-Ex. House '----" X 950. 45
2 \G. \'\ ~ I
54
I Ju
/ Proposed ---...__ FF.Elev
Portico µ = 954. 32
Ft oQ d 2
'-<c l sY '\ "
wf·de 8cOlf!Jf.p !e • ,J \ :'::f > REMOVE sidewalk
--···--···
...,.--
\
bit. d(w
Proposed-
Driveway ,·.
C\J Proposed
I'<') Garage
ret-wall-. "I
-.:( C)
(_J. ----·, .....__,
Gar. Floor
£lev=953. 02
~Ex. shed
0
cone.
, , -----_ 4-6"'ced~ ·. ~!:,,_":?:"\ ~ 949 37 273. lt-m eas 273. 7 R o . 1 o \. ~/£
4 ''pin~ ~89"58'1' "E 411+ 'L--6 cedar 30 ash
X 948. 77 --.__/' J -'>1 o/1 ±
fence on line --/ gt/> I
X 948.64 ( I ~ 1:-x
N"T:;
~. 4 nser ----
Exist
/....-
--con(
X 950. 49
/
x~90
,tz
x-
/
I 943. 6c.
~
}J
n
N
N
r-,.:,
c:::,
"'
m -< m
LEFT ELEVATION
fiBfRCDJfUT
5HMf5
FRONT ELEVATIQN
•fe'-T'-0'
12
ti fTv.
RIGHT ELE VATION
1,4ATQ1txl5T1"'G
51Dlt/G t.1PJtA
war VDH5 .-.S Rl:Otl
Pfl!.CODf
/
/'
/
EXl5T1t!G
GAAAGf
116'• 1'-0'
11-1·;.1 ;.cr
D15CLAIMER
H rWARATION or Jt1l5 l't.Ah' Mirr
AmMl'Tt'L',5flffHMADf10.AVOIO
l.!t51Mf5. Of51GNfR CAHtlOf GtJAl'Mtff
AGAINST HUMAN fAAOR. CONntACTOR TO
Vf~fY"ll OIMfNSIOl6A>1DCONOITION5
00 !lf RfSPONSIBI! rOR !Hf SAME.
TH5E Df5IGN5, COl-1Cm5 ANO
5fEClflC A.110tt5 >JU! IN51 RUMfNl50f
51:RVICE AllO /45 SUCH RfW!N R1f
lXCLU51V? ritormv or comrrr.r lVMOU.
~NO Af'.t. NOT TOM COf'lfD 't'.1TltOUT Tttf
'41'JllfN COOSfNl or C'OIJMR.Y U.JM51!1t
~! ~ ~
i i g ~
6
6 ~
ti; §i ~ /2~
I'~~
hi §
ct -l ILi I ~· Zf!i m ~.Hf ~ i·-l z,!11 nn ~Ill, vv
_>p,
~t
ILi ~ oa
~ -
~
~
1=1:1=
BASEMENT PLAN
O'
15:15Tif.lGHOl/5t
fXtSTING
""""
I
1 I
I ...... ,,_.. I
1·1 I I
~
IC!G.,0 COt«:.!ll.k
4 CR5. ~· cone. "u:..
,,·,/YCONC. l'TG.
HfW
~
ROCf'TR:u55ES
~
jUHOCAVAIUl l
I Cf'.5. ,. CONC . Olk
'4CII.S .12'COIIC.~k
20',tic.DNC .fTG .
1''·3'M.0 .
,Z-0'
I CII.S. b' COHC. NL
-1 CPS . o·couc. cu;. 1,·. o· CONC. nG:
I I
I I
if I
I I
:1
I I
I :I
I ;1
I ;I
I :1
1 ·1
1 '1
~
114·~ 1·-0·
222011
FORONO
~------------
,rD<
"·'
r---
1
I
I
I
I~ l o
I~
I~
I~ c_ __ _
I~
I~ L __ _
0
"Tl
0 ;o
0 z
0
N
N
1-....:)
c::,
0.TfGO!t'I' I Mf01ANICAL t Am.l>.Ncr: r.tOUIR!Ml!NT5
!ot'f1Nf0 5VM1NNfS0TA ST/ltf 5TA.1Ulf. Cl'WlfR 4071
KfQ\.1/RtS A MID1AlllCAl \ltNTllo\llON 5'15TtM l'l't11CH "fl'lACf:9 , !lY
Dlr-fCT OP. trlDU",!CT MU.NS, .AJR rRG.4 HA&IT¥lf P..OOtJ VMtl OUIPOOR
A~ !THIS A.UOY6 fOR ir.f USf Of ~AU5T ONlfvt:IHIV,TION. A5
WW A.5AN -'IRO:OONGfR OR HfAT RfCOVfR:YVfl([IIAIOf'J
R!OJ!P.t5 fflCT VENT, ra,o.fR VOIT OP..St>t!O COMel/STIOtl ruRUACf.
WA.TU MCATflt, OR.flP.fl'Va(GASJ
l"J,Jlt'5IIJGlftxt1AUSTDb1Cftl.G '-ITCHfNrANOR.~OVU.
JOO Cl.lOIC fW l'r:R MINUTt IOMJ 151tl51All!D, A 5~A1.tD
COM&ISIION r'UIU'1ACC MUSI & IHSTAU!O OR. .t.n Al.lfWIM
MA!:l-U, 50URCt: MUSI !If lJStO.
WGltlffRr:D ROOf TRLl55f5
WI fNERGY Hm I} 2'.(r O.C.
IJ2'WAftJ{M.5HTG
1'51m1
a ,w.11mi.St11fLD
A.Sr11ALT 5HINGt.f5
2i1, 5Uet'A5CIA
,I.LUM. 50n!T • fASCIA
COtH. 50f'1T VlNT
-'.IGlO WI~ WASH 6ARRlfP..
AlRCHUTf
2.-14@ 1,·o.c
112"W1,UJ'..~HTG .
l/2'GYI', eD WAU5
1'11:lfRCfMfNl StW..f5
~
l/2'0A~tlOl.1
0 b-0'0.C
Slll~AI.U
l'-0'
~~-~-zl:~iic~~I D
20' • 6' CONC. l'TG.
BUILDING SECTION
" •1
2"·0'
Sff et.tLDfR5 S?tOl'ICATIOO fOR WlOll#G UAlfmJ..5
CAT?GORY I el/II.DING ENV?:tOPf RfOUIP.fMCNTS
ID!Jiiitb ~1i11•ili~ ID.i. CJl~fil~ 7'10!
CAltGO~ I INCQR.f'Of(..IJE5/llRSU.UNGANOW!l-tDW'6M
MEAS\Jf'.!5 ANO RlQUrRfS MfC1111.NIC/I! V?:NTllAHOU. A CAlfC-OP.:Y I
HOVSf l5 &llll ro .f'PJ)TfCT Ttlf PWOf'.W"JCC OI' INSJAU!O
IHEl'J.!"1. 1Ji5l.ll>.OON fROM OflU'JORAJION OY I.OSTUf'.C ANO V.1NO
WAStt Tl115 l'f'.OlfCTION IS mllll()f..D er A COHUIAJ05 VAPOR
R!l~..Dflt N«J AIR ~fP.. ~ 111t IN'TUJ()f:. ANO A CONTINUCUS
eARRlt:R ON lHC fXlfPJ()Rf'WTfCTl'1G AGAl61 Y.1NO WASH. A
MfCHM'ICAl vr:NlllAflOH S'r"SlfM 15 ,.tOUtRlO AHO AOOIIIOtW.
_.~ RfQ\.111,'.fMfNTS A.5 Df5CRl8f0M!OVC AAZ. P.fOUIRl:O.
BNnOf'r: ~OUIRfMENT5 m,
I 1NlfRJ0Rv.iJb?..PIIARDfR0NINSIJLA,TfO.CfiUNG,WALL5 ,6NO
rLOO~.
:1. CONTINUOUSAIRW.RlfRAT ,6U Pl.1.JM81~·GAHD~1JNG
fWfTRATJONS .
3. frRf STOt'S WST i,t: ltlSTAU.fDTOet.00.AIRMOV!MOO !NTO THf
AfflC.
.( l'f.llf!R>TJ0tl5 IH THt BUILDIIIG tlMlOf't f~ Cl.fCTRICAl AJ-IO
TflICOMMUlnCATIOO fOLnn.vrr rexcm fOR U!CTRICAL ~
-'iltl fAU t10\JS!t1G) Mt/51 ~ SfAllO TO .f'RfvtNT AIR I.WJ.Gf.
5 WIHO WASH 6,lf,OOfR P.!OUl!~l .1,f fttr. txmtlOR f~ Of Ame
IN5UIJ,IION
NfWGAAAGf
AOOIIION
.... ~:::: ,,,,,,..,,.
... :;..:::: .......
,,,~~ ,,..~:::,,.. ,!.1;;X )
fXt5fnlG
GmG<
----------
316'•1 '-0'
b Wll/0 WASH MR!tlER RfQUIP.!O Al OVfWNGS, 5UCT1 AS
C/lrHILt\lV'tD rt.OOP.5 ANO BAY 'MNOOV6
WIIIOOW /I.ND DOOP. fRAMB MUST Ill SU.!lO.
/Ill OOfRK:llt.J()INTS Tl1AI MAYef~Of l,JRINTP.l.lSION
MUST 1'( SUl!O.
,. Rlt/ .K)tST MUST eE 5U-Lf0 10 fRfVflfl AIR l.fn.AGf.
10 TOfS Of' ltllfRJOP-l'Al'.JITIQl,fW,6!J.5 l.!UST 6f Sf,1,!fO TO PRfVUlf
AfRLLI-UGf.
I I tlCCIIOCAI. C())(fS At.I() f,1,N5 Mt.15r tt' ~l!O TO f'RfVffll Al«.
lU):).Gf.
12. Wv.tfU WAU. A5SfMellf5. RIM JOl51S. Al/0 f0UN OAIION5 MUSI
~Sf./llCD10PRfVfflfA~Lt"i:AG!
([Tt"!.15 1-0 MR! /ILWAY5 RfOIJIR!O UNOfJ( CATEGO~ Z)
NOif:
iii1ob!Jl()t,I R.ffCR TO eutOflP.S 51't.Cll'lCA110H5 ro,.,o.rEGORY I
MOUS<S.
Date Application Received: 06/22/11
Date Application Considered as Complete: 06/28/11
60-Day Review Period Expires: 08/27 /11
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Chair Schoenzeit and Planning Commission Members
Jessica Loftus, City Administrator
Melanie Curtis, Planning & Zoning Coordinator ~
13 July 2011
#11-3516, Robert "Tripp" Snyder, 1513 Bay Ridge Road,
Side Setback Variance
Public Hearing
Zoning District: LR-lA, One Family Lakeshore Residential, 2-acres/200'
Lot Area: 0 .96 acre/ 42,096 square feet
Lot Width: 100'
Counci l
Exhibit C
Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a side setback variance to allow a garage
addition to the home .
Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of a side setback
variance as the Planning Commission deems appropriate .
Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Sections
Sec. 78-305. Area, height, lot width and yard requirements.
Sec. 78-1288. Hard cover limitations.
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A.
Exhibit B.
Exhibit C.
Exhibit D.
Exhibit E.
Exhibit F.
Exhibit G.
Exhibit H.
Exhibit I.
Exhibit J.
Exhibit K.
Exhibit L.
Exhibit M.
Background
Application
Hardship Documentation Form
Proposed Survey
Proposed Elevations
Aerial Photo by Staff
Bing Birdseye Photos
Hardcover Worksheet
Hardcover Minimum Requirements
City Engineer Comments
Email From Applicant
Zoning Code Sections
Property Owners List
Plat Map
The applicant is requesting a side yard setback variance to permit a 966 square foot, garage
addition to the exist i ng home. The addition is proposed to be 8 feet from the south lot line
where a 30 foot setback is required. Set back 8 feet from the south lot line, the existing home
( (
FILE# 11-3516
13 July 2011
Page 2 of 3
does not meet the 30-foot principal structure side setback required within the LR-lA zoning
district. The addition to the home in the proposed location within the substandard setback is
considered an expansion of an existing nonconformity; a side yard setback variance is required
in order to do the project as proposed .
Additionally, the applicant is proposing reductions in hardcover within the 75'-250' zone in order
to accommodate the addition and remain at 25%.
LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET
Lot Area/Width:
LR-lA Lot Area Lot Width
Required 87,120 s.f. (2 acres) 200'
Actual 42,096 s.f. (0.96 acre) 100'
Setbacks:
LR-lA Required Existing Proposed
Lakeshore 75' 145' 145'
Rear 50' 160' to Bay Ridge Road 138'
South Side 30' 8.4' home/garage 8.4' home/ garage
5'shed
North Side 30' 11.1' 11.1'
Average Lakeshore The existing home meets the average lakeshore setback.
Side Yard Setback Variance
The applicant's property is nonconforming with respect to area and width. The existing home
does not meet the required 30-foot side setback on either side lot line. The applicant is
proposing a 26 foot deep garage addition to the home in order to achieve additional living
space. The proposed garage addition within the substandard side setback area will not encroach
closer than the existing home to the adjacent property, but the length of the encroachment will
nearly double. An existing shed set back 5' feet from the side lot line along the existing garage
is proposed to be removed as part of this project.
Practical Difficulties Statement
Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B,
and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application .
Practical Difficulties Analysis
In considering applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of
the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and
anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the
effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider
recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in
instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of
FILE# 11-3516
13 July 2011
Page 3 of 3
circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend
approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and
intent of the Orono Zoning Code.
The applicant's variance may be reasonable considering the location of the existing home on the
property. The proposed addition will result in 26 feet of additional massing along the south lot
line. There are a number of trees along the south side of the property which may afford
adequate screening of the addition from the adjacent property. Staff finds the location of the
existing home and the width of the applicant's property creates a unique circumstance not
created by the applicant and that granting the applicant's request is in harmony with the
purpose and intent of the ordinance and will not alter the essential character of the
neighborhood .
In order to construct the addition hardcover removals are necessary. The applicant has
provided a hardcover plan which results in a conforming level of hardcover (25% within the 75'-
250' zone). However, while the proposed driveway meets the City's minimum standards, the
configuration appears to be difficult for maneuverability. The applicant should address the
proposed driveway configuration to the Planning Commission's satisfaction .
Issues for Consideration
1. A 10 foot setback is the minimum principal structure, side setback permitted in any
zoning district. Should the addition be redesigned and constructed to meet a 10 foot
side setback?
2. The applicant is proposing a driveway configuration which technically meets the City's
driveway hardcover minimum, however appears to create maneuverability difficulties.
3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application?
Staff Recommendation
Planning Staff recommends approval of a side setback variance in order to construct the garage
addition and conduct hardcover removals as proposed. Planning Commission should consider
and make a recommendation whether an 8' setback is acceptable or if a 10' setback should be
required.
PC Exhibit A
City of Orono
Variance Application
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono , MN 55356
Main : 952-249-4600
fax: 952-249-4616
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
Application #
Date Received:
Staff : V\,\,(..,
Fee : $700
u ,z....z..-, I
---------Renewal : $350 --'--------
After-the-fact: $1 ,400 Double Fee
Escrow Fee : $600 / $2 ,500
This application form must be completed in full. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the
application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commiss ion Agendas.
PROPERTY INFOR~TION:
Site Address: /6/'3 ~#'i £1.{)Je b/f L>
Property Identification Number (PIN): /~ -//7·-23 '3# a?06
Date Property Acquired (month/year): o6~-7 D Yes , I own the adjacent parcels .
Zoning District: 7 1
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
... ····:,:
,: -12 -# 3 516
RECEIVED
JUN 2 2 2011
CITY OF ORONO
REQUIRED SUBMITTAL$:
All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your
application to be processed.
.Q
D
D
D
Q · ..
Not
licable
D
Q
Escrow A reement si ned
. Escrow-received
APPLICANT AND/OR OWNER:
• Agree to provide all information required or requested by the Planning Department,
• Agree to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses
incurred in review of this application, and
• Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and
owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware
that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to
recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit.
• Acknowledge the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed .
• The Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto
the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of
investigation and verification of this request.
• Applicant and/or Owner acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the
Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting,
please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and
advise the City Planner assigned to your project.
• Some or all of the information that you are asked to provide on this application is classified by State law as
either private or confidential. Private data is information which generally cannot be given to the public but can
be given to the subject of the data . Confidential data is information which generally cannot be given to either
the public or the subject of the data. Our purpose and intended use of this information is to annually update
our records and records of other governmental agencies required by law. If you refuse to supply the
information, the applicati maY. not be · sued.
Applicant's Signature: ~ Date:
Applicant's Signature: Date:
Owner's Signature: b -2o-u/
Owner's Signature:
\. -13 -# 3 51 6
RECEIVED
JUN 2 2 20 11
CITY OF ORONO
REQUIRED SUBMITTAL$:
All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your
application to be processed.
APPLICANT AND/OR OWNER:
• Agree to provide all information required or requested by the Planning Department,
• Agree to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses
incurred in review of this application, and
• Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge . The applicant and
owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware
that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to
recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit.
• Acknowledge the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed.
• The Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto
the property by City Staff, consultants, agents , Commission and Council Members for purposes of
investigation and verification of this request.
• Applicant and/or Owner acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the
Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting,
please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and
advise the City Planner assigned to your project.
• Some or all of the information that you are asked to provide on this application is classified by State law as
either private or confidential. Private data is information which generally cannot be given to the public but can
be given to the subject of the data. Confidential data is information which generally cannot be given to either
the public or the subject of the data. Our purpose and intended use of this information is to annually update
our records and records of other governmental agencies required by law. If you refuse to supply the
information , the applicati maY. not be · sued .
Applicant's Signature: ~ Date:
Applicant's Signature:
Owner's Signature:
Owner's Signature:
' p ·· .. ,!
·, .....
Date:
"'"· .. #3516 ·;: -13-.. ·.
RECEIVED
JUN 22 20'11
CITY OF ORONO
( PC Exh ibit B
HARDSHIP DO C UM E NTATION FORM
This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application will not be considered
complete or placed on any meeting agendas until th is form is complete and submitted to the City.
Minnesota State Statutes Section 462 .357 , Subdivision 6(2) requires that a hardsh ip be demonstrated in order for
a variance to be granted . The hardship must be unique to the property as variances run with the land and not the
land owner. Personal and economic situations are not considered valid hardships . In order for an application to
be heard by the Planning Commission and City Counc il a hardship having merit must be demonstrated .
HOW DO I PROVE A HARDSHIP?
This form has 12 points outl ining the basis City staff uses to determine if a hardship exists and how the variance
will affect the surround ing community. To prove a hardship , address all the relevant points listed below and
answer them as clearly as possible .
Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the variance is justified.
The information the City receives is what is used in determining a denial or approval recommendation . If you
leave something out it will not be considered .
Please address each of these hardship criteria as they relate to the request, if they do not apply, write NIA in the
space provided:
1.
2.
3.
4. "Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property
exists under the }E;)ms of the Zanin Chapter." ·. , r , IJAJl)fi. evA. ·
5 . "Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to , inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy
systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes ,
Section 116J.06 , Subd . 2, when in harmony with this Chapte r."
6.
1•, .•• ,
" '.. i
-15 -#3516
RIECE~VED
JUN 22 2011
CITY OF ORONO
7. "The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family
dwelling."
I 1 :;5 ~;f1/J-.vc& /J. ~/C"9??tJ!?J
9 . "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located ." zi/£ 7 )/pt,>54'5 {)LJ lJbo 5r//t£-r,da.l/.,,t#£ 'l?/£ £&42e' ~
Hardship Statement
Should you feel the hardship cannot fully be described in the above criteria , describe the unique hardship,
practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Ord inance requirements in
the following lines (attach additional sheets if necessary):
#r,1<:-/$7 WE ,(}E{Jt7£~ddpdlM6-c4.£doz-4;)b{!;l!eUr
.6 /JA(;/£J££Lj kbvu2 .M~ d..5W~E' /,1Wqz414 bVht'a?Z/
-. 7 //dfJdrP-/rktJ4!J ll@tl/~d,J!;)(Uvutl:e dE.1>&9-<.J cJr 77/6:
@1.su~ l/'9L/fatf 4,d; ~!f///Ek_lfy; //6-?t;;~Z?~/~ ~£E ~?&.
J;Jfd 771£ /J.~£L} J65/~)_#&LJ 41dJJ~d~~ .5ElJ9..#c...
n -.i. :~· '., ···,, .. ; . .._
··-.., i: -16-#3516
RECEIVED
JUN 2 2 2011
CITY OF ORONO
7. "The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family
dwelling ."
8 .
I tJ/'/.5 ~,£1/J-.vC& /J, t/C~7lt!7J
9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located."
dE: 7 ~d5£6 t)LJ lJ/-/6 .5'rAli'£rAad4#~ uY& M&c ~
Hardship Statement
Should you feel the hardship cannot fully be described in the above criteria, describe the unique hardship ,
practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements in
the following lines (attach additional sheets if necessary):
N'/,'G·/-07 771£ ,l}&,}tj£,UlJ:,dtp2"6(6C££.Edoz-:~.tr
6 /Ap/!£J.5M cl?v~ M~ ,&:..5a/t6l!E' /.M9741~ b/"..Cc:t'a?Z, 7
,14) ZJUr~0 A@t!/~d.JEXT6,()£r£ 6c.1>EJ94-J c>r 77/E'
:E.::SZ7dy #r9L/~ 4d:J ~!{/tlE/cJ1-tj; //6-0~-Z:Zq-1/-{j 4ȣ.E ~~
?t(i;d 7716 t?.~..$21 ~fk,) .#&d /j~J/JC,; 6~ .5aJB!..#L
.15.# 3 516
REC EIVED
JUN 2 2 201 1
CITY OF ORONO
RECEIVED
JlfN 2 2 2011
,\
CtTY·Of"ORONO
Certificate of Survey
& Topographic Survey #3516
I I
I
i ,1 I l
I ks
I/~
I I
II
)...
~
I u
I
I I
I I
/ Q /
I s:-I
7'"" ~f "'.:. ~ ... ,/ I /, / 7 ~ .,,,,,,
I / L.
;/ --/,_.,,-
"""'
\ ~)'
I'"' .....
'(,'-'
•$1,f/$,"
• !147.f.J
•S4lJ.71
LEGEND
.0:,0,i,1
0 denottts light pole
0 denote!! power poJe
0 dttnott1s trt1t1
_,,,,__ denotes exiating contour
2,o'Fff(JM GWIit.-'\ I
\
~, I
"
• 5'411.fVg.fg ,02
I'-'-'"\
£1'. Hou ..
""" -«11.12
() ~)v
. .,,,., • 9$J..(!1 J •SI.SO.~
/ • 900.J7
# I
I'"-/ I/ ...... "' /.,... I
2a":-nJ:~ tj2' ./ / /
/ '/ .. ,, ... ~ ( /,
,.._.... •!151.1 •~. I
'""J ·m,,,../ /
~!.-45 _J . / --;,t. ~1:jpod
_..,.,,,.. concr
····9!Kl.49
I
I
/
:. 948.22 dMotes existing :,pot elevation
}:a( dftnot• utRlty pol•
[IJ (hnot .. t.l.pl,M• box
• denotes iron monument found
O denotes iron pipe set ~
and marked as shown : ~
S denotes soil boring
'-denotes percolation test hole
--1148-denotes proposed con tour
x 847.ao donotM proposed spot elevation
Certificate of Survey
& Topographic Survey
on Tracts H & K, Registered
Land Survey no. 192,
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Requisted By:
Date:
6/7/11
PROPERTY DcSCRtPnON:
Tract H ond Troct K, R~•t.,-.,J Lond su,..,,,,y No. 1i2, Hfinnflf)ln
County, Mlnnnota, occordlng to th• fl• of th• R~lstror of TTU...
Tripp Snyder
Drawn By : Scale: Checked By:
c.s.o. 1"=30' P.E.O.
~ FRON Qt,flll -.. ...._
\
,tU4.0I >·
I
NOTE: Boundary ond Topo Survey wos completed for
Caro Zlf!borth on 1-4-07 No field work was done
with this Survey ta verify PropBrty conditions.
I
-<Ml. (aN.41&1)
TOTAL AREA = 42096± SF. TO OHWI..
PROPQS[Q HARQCQYER
HAROCO'v£R CALCULA 710NS: (0-75?
ARE:A • /U4t; SF.
l=Tmn:™""" ROAD I :: S.F. r=-1
rorAL HAIIDCO>ER AREA • :Jal6 S.F.
TDTAL HARDCO'.£R • 45.:ZX
HAROCO'v£R CALCULA 710NS: (75'-250?
ARE:A • 1977:J SF.
STRUCT!JRF: ~=w~O\',IPA110
EJIISTINC II/AUS
CXJSTINC CONCIIETE
l'ROl'OS£D HOUSE ADDITION
l'ROl'OS£D Dll/1£1k< Y ADDITION
PflOP05ED CONa/£TE
PROPOSED CONC.~A no REMOVAL
PROPOSED SHED RDIOVAL
l'ROl'OS£D Dll/1£1k< Y REMOVAL
PROPOSED NMLL ROIOVAL
AREA
J119 S.F.
19.Jt S.F.
1.JOS.F.
10IJIIS.F.
9MS.F.
24 S.F.
B8 S.F.
-1.J11 S.F.
-IM 5.F.
-1000 S.F.
-!HJ S.F.
rorAL HNIDCOl£R AR£A --S.F.
7t1TAL HARDCO'.£R • 25.0Jl
(250'-500? HARDCOVER CALCULA 110NS:
ARE:A • 13877 SF.
~
~-y l2m7:F.
7DTAL HARDCOVER AMA • 2811 S.F.
7DTAL HA.RDCO'l£R • 20.~
111111<
g.111<
0./11<
/i!IS
,u,r
0.001,r
0./)(JJJf
··" 0.001,r
111,r
0./XJJJf
E!T
"' .JJf
"C
()
m
)(
:::r
C"
I hereby certify that this survoy,
plan, or report was prepared by me
or under my direct supervision and t°r!.e~o0
rmunade~
0 rheur:;:~f ~:d
Stv.ncsota. 'c!dR
Paul E. otto /.'/
I Revised, ::+ $.TTO -;1--,.,.-----.,0
' ' Pit: (7&3)fl82-472T Job No.
SSOCIATD fa,c (713}612-3522 1-11-0111
Date : t;, .. 7r License # 4006 E,,,,,...,. and I.and llurwyo,s, Inc.
f
/
!
J
I
LI
r_.
-..)
\ .
/1 v' v,·
\
I
I
r.;.)
(J\ a
\
x 949Sf4
... -···-
~ 948.52
x 946.B3
"947. f3
• 9 45. 74
L£G£ND
\
! .,
Y. 950.87
• 950.7:5
k 950.02
250' FROM OHKl -···, ..
\
\
>'
I
I 953.76
"
I
Ex. House
FF.£/ev
=951.12
n ov " '.) \
Ex. House
X 953~55 • 953.01
/ X 950.58
• 950.37
,/
;;.rf52.08
15.7±<_ NJJ,.<J:57'-ffW 438:J:/
"--J00.28 meas 300.:Ja--RLS No. 19_2·
/
/ X 94-7.64-/
/ /
/ , 946 .l
I
,,./ " 943. 68 /
~. "~ O; J·7
/
I
,. 941 .40 /
I
/
J i Oj
I
/
I 1 Cv N /,,,
I \ ---~
1 ''-::;. 5) I \
75' FROM OHWL -···-...... / j . \
\ /
\ ;' / J ~ 944.01 \ . ,j // i
I '11 /
f"._3 (1 I
,943s2 !l I / /
/rj I A
~ 942. 9 L ....... /j' __ .. ,._ ... .L /
I
L. 44
. 1929)
2 \G 0 \'\ ~ I
54
I
\/
~
bnck walls ~
/ Proposed -. -
Portico µ
~oQd 2~
w~·de 8corn:..-qp l e ·
sidewalk
/~-1-·-. ..,,,,.-.
Ex. House
L""' 1 FF. Elev
=954.32
"--/.
-r.-:.-·~ REMOVE
-~ ()
(J . ----. ---,.__,
\
<"J Proposed
~ X 950.45
-----r:. ,.,---4 n ser
-----0
[x ist
./
"OrlC --G
X 950. 49
-----x 94~ 90
µ' I Ju d(w
f'r') Garage
ret-wall -.
Gar. Floor
Elev= 953. 02 deck-
Proposed-:.
Driveway 952. 55 ' _,,-Ex. shed
con e .
-----. ·--k 949.37 213 ~·~~~~.1 R ~~~r:&lE
7j'\24 ''pine ~S89"58'1' "£ 411+ 'L--6 cedar 30 ash
f X 948. 77 '------._/ J ->1 o/.1 ±
fence on line .---/ gAB /
I ~ <o ~
X 948. 64
N~
------x-
/ /
/. 943. 6c
~
lJ
&
0
N
N
,-..,:,
c:::> __..
"'
n m -< m
C
f.xt5TING
HOOSf
LEFT ELE VATION
""" 5HIJTTf'5---fW,,l,!m1t
fl~fRClMOO
SHMl'5 -H'rr'rlIIIll.
FRONT ELEVATIO_N
" 7.v.1 ,,
l'.O'
,m,;.·1·-0·
" • rrv:
RIGHT ELE VATION
MATClifXISTING
51DING ,JRIM
ROOf VfNTS A5 Rf.OD
rt:RCOOf
,,,,,,,,"',,
/
fXISTING
GAAAGf
tiO'•l'-0'
IJ.!' .. 1'·0'
D15CLA IM ER
IN f'WARATION 0, THIS /'LMI fVfRY
AnEMf'THA58lfNMADf TO.A.VOID
Mi5TAA!S. Df51GNfR CANI-.OT GU~..ANTCf
AGAINST HUWJ.l ERROR. CONTP..ACTOR TO
VERlfYi\U.01MfNSION5AfJDCONOITl0tl5
AND8f R!51'0NSIOO: l'OR Tt1f SA.ME .
lHE5f Df5IGN5, coucms ANO
Sf'fC!flCATIOi'IS >.RC INSTRI.JME NIS Of
SERVICE AND A5 5UCH R.fMAlN THE
fXCLU~Vf l'ROf'flUY Of COI.JNTP.Y lUMeCP.
AND r,.J',! NOT TO ~ COf'IW wm1our 111f
l\,fijTIW CONSENT or COUN'TR:l' LUM&J?..
L "'1 <it
~ ~
I t
{
~
z
0
6
ii/
tii z
0 u
* :fl
~ ii td
='1 11.1 ,
!-' zig .
11.1 fz!i u1!i f d"-' z:~!i ~,,,,
-i r/J I
II.I ! Q
• -
-"C (')
m
)(
';;1'
C" ;::;:
0
6A5EMENT PLAN
O'
S C.~. 12'COOC.W..
ON 2cr , rr COHC. n G.
~
fXl5TINGMOU5f
I , I
I : I ~
EXISTING
Cm.G<
'LJJ 1, L __ Ji' ' I
I ; r -T I I I , , . .,. ,, . .,. I
I : I I I
I ' ,c,s.<'CONC .ll!k Nfw I I
I I 4CR5. O'CO,IC. '"'· ~ ' I , ,,·,e·coNc . rrG I '
I , I ROOt TRU5Sf5 I : I
I ' I @2'-6'0.C . '
I
: I ICR5 .. ''CD11C . OU<. I . I
HRS 6' CONC . w.. I ' I
I ' I -· juNt:XCAvArro l i,·,e·CONC.nG .~ ' ' ;:; I :I
I : I I :1
I : I I :1
I I I 'I
I I I i i
I I _J~'~_';~i~w. l : I I I ,~' O'CONC . FTC. . I : I
l ,L------____________ .JI
"'·3'M.0
32'-0'
~
~
114 '• ,·-er 2
or <
2 2 2011
FORONO
.,-or
.r.vz
r---
1
I
I
I
11(
l o
I~
I~
I~ c_ __ _
I~
I~
L __ _
Q
0
"Tl
0
::0
0 z
0
N
N ,....,,
c::, --
0.TfGORY I MECMANICAL t APPllANCf P.fOUIRfMENTS
(DEFIWfOflYMINNf§0TAST.ATE5TATUTE.CttAPTE R 407)
RfOUIRfS A Mf CtiANIO.l VENTILAHON S'ISTEM v.,11CN Rt/'LACE5, 61'
OJRfCT OP,, INDIP.ECT MfAt6, AlR fROM HABITAJUf ROOM WHH OUTDOOR.
,1,!R,. (TMl5 .IIUOWS roR me 1J5t Of EXHALl5T OND' 1/1:NTILATJON, AS
WELl AS AN AIR D::CH.6oNGER OR MEAT RECOVERY VfNTUATOPJ
RfOU!RfS DIRECT VENl , PO'N?R VENT OR 5/'..AltO COMOUSTION fUfl:NACt.
W<I.TER HfAIE~ OR f!P.l'.f'\ACE (GA5)
If AM' 511/GLf E)[HAUST Of',,1Cf (f.G . me HEN fAN CR OR"l"lRJ 01/1:R
300 OJBIC ffET f'ER MIN\Jlf (CfM) 15 1MS1 AUW, A 5~.Al!D
COMflllSTION rLJRNACf M\JST 6E HJSTAUED ORAN Al.lf~ATIVf
MAKE-Ur SOURCE MUSI Bf USED.
fNGINffRfDROOfTR1J55~
WI fNERGY11E'fl@ ~.(J' O.C.
J/2' wMER eo . SlifG
ISlffLT
!CftWATER5111fLO
A5f'l1ALT5HlNGl.f5
a, 5U6fA5CIA
i\WM. S0fl'IT • FASCIA
CONT. S0Ff1T vmr
R.!GID WIND WA.511 llARRlfP...
AIRCl1lJTE
2'4@ lb'O.C.
112'WAffR~TG.
l/2'GYP. 80 WAU5
f15ER.CfMENl5NAt;.f5
Tfo51Uf'LAl~
1/2'0,ANCNORWI.T
@b'-CfO.C.
?!J!?t'ALfR
l'-0'
I CR5 .b'COtJC. 6l"-
4CR5. 12·coNC.etJ..I D
~
BU ILDING SECTION
4'CQl,,'C.
fl.R. 5LA8
2b'-O'
SEE BlJIID'ERS Sf'fCIFICATION fOR BUILDING MATERIALS
CATfGORI' I EIUll.DlNG fNVELDPt: Rt:ot.JtRfMfNTS
ID"./l'lf05Y MIIU50144U.CIW1(~7,"/0!
O.TfGOR:Y I INCWOF.,1,1!5 ,t,,IRSEAUNGANDMNDWASM
MEASUP.tS AND R!:OUIRf5 MfQ1.&j,JIC,t,,.t VfNTII.ATIOU. A O.TEGORY I
t100Sf !5 EIUILT TO PROTECT flit: WtfOM-!ANC!'. Of INSTAlLfD
THfRMAL IN51JLATIQN fROM Ofll:RIORATION BY MQtSTUPJ: ANO V.1NO
WASM. Tl11S f'P:OT?CTION 15 PROVIDED 6Y A CO,\ITINUOS VAPOR
R!TARDER. ANO AIR e.i..R.R.JER. ON lHE IN'TfRIOR AJ.ID A CONTINUOUS
6ARRIER ON THE OOU'JOR. PROTECTING AGAJNSJ 'MNO WA511. A
MECttAfJ!CAL Vt:NHLATION SYSTEM 15 P.t:OIJ;RfO ANO AQDIHONAL
l<PPUANCE'S Rt:0UIREMENT5 4.5 Df5CRJMO AOOVC AA!. f?!Ol/lRfO.
tNVUOPE Rt:Olllw.ifNTS A.Ill.·
I INTERIOR V4J'OR.P..ETAWER0N!N5ULAifD-CEIUNG. WA!..l.S AND
fLOORS
2. CONTINUOUS AJR !W'.R.IER. AT l<ll FLUM61% AND HEATING
f'fNflRATIONS
3. f/Rf STOPS MUST BE INSTAUfOTO 61.00:.AIR MOVEMEN'T INTO T11E
ATTIC
4. PWEiR/lflONS IN Thf BU!LDltlG fNVflOl'C f0'1. tlfCTRIO.t ANO
i"ElfCOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT !fk'CEPT roi: fl!CTRJCAL 60X?.5
l>ND FAIi HOUSING) MUST Bf 5fA1..fD TO l'RfVtNT AIR lfAA.AGf s. WiNO WASH 6ARRlER P.lQUIRfO J,f TttE EJ,TER.IOR EDGE OF Ame
1N5U\,A.TION
/ ,· / .,,,.,.-,·
,/
N:WGA.~Gf
ADDITION
-,:,~~·,..-,·
~J,g?"::/
rxn
fXISTlliG
GARAGE
3/8'•1'-0'
G. WINO WA5/1 BMR!fR REQUIRED A.T OVERl1ANG5, SUCt1 A5
C>NTll.fl/V'!D rwor.s AND BAY W1ND0Y6.
7. wmoow .d.NO OOOR. FR/1Mf5 MUST 6E 5&.lID.
6 ,t,.LL OO"fR.JOR JOINTS Tt1Al 'MA.Ye?" 50Ul1CE5 Of AIR INTRUSION
t.4UST6fSf>LEO.
9. R.ltJ JOIST MUST flf SEAUD TO FP.lVEHl AIR L!AKAGt:.
IO. TOl'S or (NnRlOR Pm!TION WA.LL.5 MUST Of 5EAl!D TO PRfVfNT
,l,IRLf,1.,1'.AGf.
I r ClfCHOCAl BOX[!; AND rANS MUST et 5fAlfD TO f'Rf\lfNT AIR
ll>J:.11.Q:.
J 2. OO"Wl:fN WAU A5SEM6Llf5. RIM JOISTS. AND f0UNOAilON5 MUST
BfSE/ILEOTOFRfVfNT AIRLE"-!:AGE
()TeM5 1.0 WtR! ALWAYS REOUIP.10 UNDfR OTfGORY 2)
NOTE:
iITT15brTION RfffR TO 51JILDfR5 srEClflCAIIOt.S FOR CATEGORY I
HOUSfS.
1513 Bay Ridge Road
#11-3516
PC Exhibit E
PC Exhibit F
32
0
0
...I
(
I
Looking south
·-~
0
0
...J
. ' 1.3 ~ I J ~ ,,G Date : h -aJ-// Address : /6 . ~l//[/~ ~ ~
Prepared by: /f.7. ~ 'f/)G!L-
PC Exhibit G
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
SETBACK ZONE: {CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' ~50-500' 500-1000'
EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A. House X = S.F.
Length
-~idth J-fi2_ :I,~/ X = S.F.
.~7 X = S.F .
B. Garage /,t}tl,,t_ X = S.F. .
C . Driveway 55/ X 11 = 9Jo S.F.
f X = ~ S.F.
/;,t..-
D. Sidewalk X !i =
(~
S.F.
X = S.F.
7,5 b-b
E. Patio/Deck L'l!L X ~7./J = !/tz2-S.F.
LQ.,t'l X / t?,t) = Lt?~ S.F.
tflb //,0 ~8,
F. Landscape X = S.F .
Underlain X = S.F.
By Plastic X = S.F.
G. Retaining Walls t/f~ X = fft) S.F .
H. Other X = S.F .
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 62~ S.F. A
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 7?,7 3. S.F. B
A ~ B x100 = J/,.7 %
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE (including existing hardcover to be retained)
A. House X = S.F.
:.~th Width
X .fi = L¥'& S.F .
c<h X = ,£;:JZ-S.F .
B. ferage ZS 02.5 X 32. = 9/b S.F.
'&/l77CO ~ L~
70
C. Driveway X = ~ S.F.
X /!/' = S.F.
/0 gpo
D. Sidewalk X P? = hB S.F.
X = S.F.
E. Patio/Deck /{3 X .x7 = #'f6 S.F.
122 X /0 = /t:JO S.F.
F. Landscape X = S.F .
Underlain X = S.F.
By Plastic X = S.F.
G. Retaining Walls 1~o X I = ?'// S.F.
H. Other ~ X ~ = ~:/ S.F .
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE !jh S.F. A
TOT AL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE S.F . B
A B RECEI VED 100 = % ,9p
-21JtJN 2 2 2 O 11 #3 51 6
CITY OF ORON O
PC Exhibit H
Hardcover Information
www.ci.orono .mn .us
952-249-4620
Since 1975, the City of Orono has regulated hardcover on properties within 1,000 feet of lakes . In 1992 ,
hardcover regulations were added for properties within 300 feet of Painters, Long Lake, Wolsfeld, Stubbs Bay,
and Dickey Lake creeks . Hardcover is any surface that does not allow direct absorption of rainfall into the
ground. Limiting hardcover helps improve water quality and promotes aquifer recharge.
HARDCOVER ALLOWED
Distance from the ordinary high water
(OHW) of a lake or top of bank of a creek Amount of Hardcover allowed
0 to 75 feet No hardcover except lake access stairs when needed, an 8'
wide driveway when needed, a dock landing of up to 32 square
feet , and retaining walls aooroved by a conditional use oermit.
75 to 250 feet 25% of the property within that zone
250 to 500 feet 30% of the property within that zone
500 to 1 000 feet 35% of the property within that zone
Hardcover may be increased up to the unused square footage of allowable hardcover of a zone closer to the
OHWL. Unused hardcover cannot be transferred to a zone closer to the lake .
The allowed hardcover in any zone shall be decreased by the amount of legal-non-conforming hardcover in the
zone next closer to the OHWL.
HARDCOVER INCLUDES:
• Roofs
• Sidewalks, steps, and patios
• Decks , including decks on play equipment
(even if there are gaps between the boards)
• Driveways, regardless of surface material
• Tops of retaining walls, including boulder
walls , and isolated boulders
• Landscape areas underlain by weed control
fabric of any sort .
ASSUMED HARDCOVER
• Swimming Pools
• Porous or pervious pavement
• Tennis or Sport Courts
• The portion of a roof overhang that extends
more than 2 feet from the wall
• Any other vehicle, material, equipment, or
structure that prevents absorption of rainfall
and is maintained in the same location long
enough that no vegetation grows under it.
The following items must be included in hardcover calculations regardless of whether or not they are proposed to
be constructed :
1. A two car garage (detached or attached).
2 . A driveway to any garage or storage area with a door wider than six feet
3. Minimum dimensions for driveways (see drawing on reverse side)
4 . 24 inch wide sidewalk from the front door to the driveway and stairway/landing at exterior doors
EXCHANGE OF HARDCOVER
If a property exceeds allowed hardcover Staff does not have the authority to approve new hardcover even if an
equal amount of hardcover is removed.
SURVEYS AND HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS
When a building permit is requested for expansion or construction of a structure a survey and hardcover
calculation worksheets may be required to demonstrate compliance with hardcover regulations .
This is an information sheet. Every effo,t has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however,
if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code , the Code provisions will prevail.
1/4
HARDCOVER COMPLIANCE
Illegal hardcover may be required to be removed before a building permit is issued. Illegal
hardcover is hardcover in excess of that allowed by a hardcover variance or hardcover in excess
of that allowed by the Code that was added to the property after 1975 or 1992.
FOR MORE INFORMATION
Contact the Planning and Zoning Department at 952-249-4620 or planning@ci.orono.mn .us .
Reference: City Code Section 78-1288
May, 2009
Garage
'o
.s:: ~ i~
Side Load E ~
:::, "' E i5
'i: Cl
~
l_-
Backup Apron
(If Required)
8'x8' Minimum
--------Apron Depth 20' Min .
£ C. .
QI C
0~
§r,,
~ ....
C. <
_l
End Load
Minimum Width of
Garage Door
4'Rad_/
(Min)
Driveway Width _ _._ __ _,
8' Minimum
S' Rad . S' Rad.
Edge of Right-Of-Way
(Lot Line)
Minimum Driveway Standards
Driveway Width
8' Min imum
(20' Maximum)
This is an information sheet. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained
herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code , the Code provisions
will prevail.
2/4
Primary
Property
L-------------
Primary
Property
I
I
I
I
Secondary
Property
.....L_ _________________ ~
Secondary
Property
I I
L-----------------.....L_-----------------~
=Excludable area-not covered in area
nor hardcover of primary lot. Also not
added to the hardcover calculations for
the secondary property.
Driveway Easements
This is an information sheet. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained
herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code , the Code provisions
will prevail.
3/4
E ::::,
E Wall --·c
~
Cl ....
Hardcover
Hardcover
Overhangs
Not Hardcover
This is an information sheet. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained
herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions
will prevail.
4/4
PC Exhibit I
2335 Highway 36 W
St. Paul , MN 55113
Tel 651 -636-4600
Fax 651-636 -1311
www .bonestroo .com
June 30, 2011 :ft eonestroo
Ms. Melanie Curtis
Planning & Zoning Coordinator
City of Orono
Post Office Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Re: 1513 Bay Ridge Road
File No . 000139-11000-1
Plat No. 11 -3516
Dear Melanie:
We have reviewed the plan for the proposed garage located at 1513 Bay Ridge Road. The plan is
dated June 7, 2011. We have the following comments with regards to engineering matters:
• The plan is generally acceptable from an engineering standpoint.
• The applicant has acknowledged the difficult driveway configuration proposed to limit
hardcover. We recommend that the city verify the proposed driveway dimensions with
the applicant after the area is prepared but prior to placement of its new pavement.
• This project will disturb more than 25, but less than 100 cubic yard of material.
Sediment and erosion control information meeting the requirements of Orono 's City Code
79-7(c)(1) must be submitted. The minimum $2000 sediment and erosion control
financial security should be required of the applicant for this permit.
If you have any questions, please call me at (651) 604-4894.
Sincerely,
BONESTROO
0 --~
Darren Amundsen
Cc: Tom Kellogg
Melanie Curtis
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Melanie :
trippsnyder@aol.com
Tuesday, June 28, 2011 9:33 PM
Melanie Curtis
paul@ottoassociates .com ; Darren.Amundsen@bonestroo .com
Re: 1513 Bay Ridge File 11-3516 Comments
In response to your question, the info is as follows :
PC Exhibit J
With regard to tree removal , there is currently a cedar tree, with 3 branching trunks, at the front corner of the existing
garage . You can see it on the blown up version of the survey. This tree was extensively damaged in the late November
snow storm we had last year, and would need to be removed in any case , as 2 of its three main trunks have split from the
wet snow sitting on it , and the tree has turned brown . In addition , there are 3 blue spruce trees currently sited at what will
be slightly to the west of the new garage , (also easily identified on the blown up portion of the survey) about 3 feet from
the driveway . We will be relocating the one spruce tree closest to the new garage to the west of the other two, so no trees
will be lost due to the new garage .
With regard to the south side of the house where we are removing concrete, we will be planting a series of spirea and lilac
bushes , to create a flowering delineation between our house and the house to the south . These bushes will rapidly grow
to a height of 6-8 feet , and will provide a pleasing delineation of the lot line, when compared to the disintegrating wood
fence that is currently there , located on the neighboring property . We do not currently plan to change the grading along
that side of the house , as the new plantings, and the grass that will also be placed along that side of the house , should
easily hold any runoff from that side of the house.
With regard to the new driveway, we have laid it out so that a car exiting from either the middle stall or the far south stall
would be able to turn around in the apron portion of the driveway, and head out of the driveway facing the street. With
regard to the third stall on the north end of the driveway , if a vehicle exits that stall it would be able to be turned toward the
street by turning around in front of the other two stalls . the driveway as pictured meets the city requirements, and indeed,
we have given quite a bit of thought to the ability to turn around , as eliminating the amount of hard cover we have
eliminated has made this more difficult. However, based on the layout Paul has proposed, we feel the driveway apron is
sufficiently large to allow vehicles parked in the garage, regardless of what stall they are in , to exit the driveway facing the
street by turning around in the apron . As just a point of interest, in my previous house in Eden Prairie , I had to back out of
the driveway all the way to the street (which was much busier that Bay Ridge Road}, and never had any issues . All of my
neighbors did the same .
Let me know if you or the engineer have any additional questions .
Tripp Snyder
-----Original Message-----
From : Melanie Curtis <MCurtis@ci.orono .mn .us>
To : 'trippsnyder@aol.com ' <trippsnyder@aol.com>
Cc: paul <paul@ottoassociates .com>; 'Darren Amundsen' <Darren .Amundsen@bonestroo .com>
Sent: Tue, Jun 28, 2011 1: 16 pm
Subject: RE: 1513 Bay Ridge File 11-3516 Comments
Tripp
Thank you for the updated information. I sent it to our engineer and he had some additional comments/questions .
• Which, if any, trees will be removed as part of this project?
• Where and what is the proposed grading around the addition? What about in the place of the concrete removal(s) to
improve drainage? Please show on survey.
• Demonstrate that the third garage stall will be functional with the proposed driveway configuration .
Thanks!
Melanie Curtis tr 952.249.4627 f8J mcurtis@ci.orono .mn .us
1
PC Exhibit K '
Sec. 78-305. Area, height, lot width and yard requirements.
(a) Height. No structure or building in the LR-1A district shall exceed 2 1/2 stories and shall
not exceed 30 feet in height except as provided in section 78-1366 .
(b) Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be observed :
Lot Area (acre) Lot Width (feet) Front Yard (feet) Side Yard (feet) Side Yard Rear Yard (feet)
2
Adjacent to Street
(feet)
200 50 30 50 50
Sec. 78-1288 . Hard cover limitations.
(a) Hardcover allotment. The following hardcover restrictions apply to all properties in the
Shoreland Overlay District:
(1) Hardcover zones.
a . Within 75 feet of the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) of any lake or tributary ,
no hard cover or impervious surface shall be placed , located or constructed,
except for driveways, stairways, lifts, landings and lockboxes as regulated
elsewhere in this Code .
b. Between 75 feet and 250 feet of the OHWL, there shall be no greater than 25
percent hardcover.
c . Between 250 feet and 500 feet of the OHWL there shall be no greater than 30
percent hardcover.
d. Between 500 feet and 1,000 feet of the OHWL there shall be no greater than 35
percent hardcover.
(2) Zone to zone credit/debit.
a . The allowed allotment of hardcover for the 250 feet to 500 feet zone or the 500
feet to 1,000 feet zone may be increased up to an unused square footage of
allowable hardcover of a zone closer to the OHWL.
b. Unused hardcover cannot be transferred to a zone closer to the OHWL.
c . If hardcover is credited from one zone to another, add itional hardcover may not
be later added to the zone closer to the OHWL if the presence of such hardcover
would have prevented the crediting .
d. The allowed hardcover in any zone shall be decreased by the amount of legal
non-conforming hardcover in the zone next closer to the OHWL.
(b) Additional hardcover provisions.
(1) Overhangs:
a. Where an overhang is supported by a post , the area under the overhang to the
outer edge of the post shall be considered as hardcover.
b. All but the outer two feet of an unsupported overhang ten feet or more off the
ground shall be considered hardcover.
The following drawings are included for illustrative purposes: [Drawing 1 ].
(2) Decks : Hardcover may be added under a deck attached to a principal structure if the
deck is conforming or legal nonconforming and the added hardcover is otherwise
permitted .
(3) Driveway easements: The following principles apply where one or more properties
(secondary property) gain its driveway access from an adjacent property (primary
property) by virtue of a driveway easement:
a. That portion of the driveway on the primary property that serves both the primary
and secondary property is considered hardcover for the primary property .
b. That portion of the driveway on the primary property that serves only the
secondary property is not considered hardcover for either the primary or
secondary property .
c. The area of the driveway on the primary property that serves only the secondary
property shall not be included in the lot area of the primary property for purposes
of calculating hardcover.
The following drawings are included for illustrative purposes : [Draw ing 2].
(c) Future improvements. The following items shall be included in hardcover calculations
regardless of whether they are proposed to be construction at the time of building permit application :
(1) Proof of a two-car garage (detached or attached).
(2) For all garages a driveway , subject to the standards in paragraph (d) of this section .
(3) A 24 inch wide sidewalk from the front door to the driveway .
(4) The minimum stairway or landing at all exterior doors as required by the building code.
(d) Driveways . All driveways shall comply with the following minimum dimensional standards :
(1) Driveways serving end loading garages shall maintain a driveway apron with minimum
width equal to the width of the overhead door(s).
For purposes of this section, a driveway apron is that portion of a driveway that extends
15 feet from the garage door(s) on an end loading garage.
(2) Driveways serving side loading garages shall provide a minimum turn around or back up
depth of 20 feet, as measured from the garage door(s).
(3) Minimum driveway taper ratio shall be 2 :1.
(4) Driveways shall be at least eight feet in width at the street or private road .
(5) A turnaround shall be provided for a driveway with direct access to an arterial or collector
roadway , or for a side load garage as determined necessary by the city planner. The
minimum dimensions of the turnaround shall be eight feet in width by 12 feet in depth.
(6) "Wheel strip" driveways are allowed, but the entire width of the driveway (from outside to
outside of the strips) will be considered hardcover.
The following drawing is included for illustrative purposes : [Drawing 3].
(e) Compliance .
(1) It is unlawful to convert, enlarge, or alter any structure or use any structure in a manner
that violates the hardcover limitations .
(2) Nonconforming hardcover may not be relocated or expanded in any way unless the
property is brought into conformance except:
a. A roofline may be changed but the roof may not be extended over unroofed
portions of the structure .
b. An additional story may be added over roofed portions of a structure .
c . An open or screened porch may be converted into a two or three season porch
or year round living space (including replacing a post foundation with a perimeter
foundation) provided hardcover is not increased .
(3) This section is independent of lot coverage regulations in the city Code . Accordingly, a
property must conform to both hardcover and lot coverage regulations .
PC Exhibit L
RUN DATE: 6/21/2011 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OW!'n.i<S LIST)
38 !0-!!7-23 ll 0002
HENN EPIN CO REGIONAL RR AUTH
38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
HENNEPIN COUNTY
REGIONAL RAJLROAD AUTHORITY
41 7 5TH ST N SUITE 320
MrNNEAPOLIS MN 5540 1
38 I 0-117-23 34 0007
TWILA B GERMANSON ET AL
1501 BAYRJDGERD
TWILA B GERMANSON
DONALD M GERMANSON
PO BOX91
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 10-11 7-23 34 0014
BERTA KVAMME REVOCABLE TRUST
2050 SHORELINE DR
BERTA KVAMME
2050 SHORELINE DR
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 !O-l !7-23 33 0006
GREGG W/DENISE E STEINHAFEL
2285 NORTH SHORE DR
GREGG W/DENISE E STEINHAFEL
2265 NORTH SHORE DR
WAYZATA MN 5539 1
38 I 0-117-23 34 0008
ROBERT SNYDER
1513 BAY RJDGE RD
ROBERT SNYDER
1513 BAY RIDGE RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 10-117-23 34 0016
BERTA KVAMME REVOCABLE TRUST
38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
BERTA KVAMME
2050 SHORELINE DR
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 10-11 7-23 34 0006
SUSAN M KERBER & JOHN C HOLM
1485 BAY RJDGE RD
SUSAN M KERBER & JOHN C HOLM
1485 BAY RJDGE RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 I 0-117-23 34 0009
SCOTT E LEIFERMAN
1525 BAY RIDGE RD
SCOTT E LEIFERMAN
1525 BAY RJDGE RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 15-11 7-23 22 0001
NORTH SHORE MEADOWS LLC
2165 NORTH SHORE DR
NORTH SHORE MEADOWS LLC
PO BOX67
CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENT~
AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE R~etlRD
DATE: BYf._.,_··~t:'f;,-C-J.,<'{l.-,,{;...-t;-4~:.__::_4 -1
#3516
RECEIVED
JUN 22 2011
CffY OF ORONO
PC Exhibit M
~-=-~............._~--·-==~--=== _:::-::::;_ -=..:::-:-:.~'""""::::: -:::::==-~-:-=...--:::;;:.-.:.:.-=-----· -----·-
-------------_____________________ ----.___, j
! I
] 1
(S)
(71
( )
For more information contact:---·--------Pri;t Date: 6/21/2011 ---· -··1
Hennepin County GIS Division
300 South 6th Street Map Scale: 1" = 115'
Minneapolis, MN 55487 Buffer Size: 150 feet I
gis. info@co.hennepin.mn. us
I
Map Comments: I
-------1 I
I
I i , I
-Type Comments Here -
I
. ·----·--· -----·---I.
---------·----··-----1
! Map Leiend :
Par cel
C:=J Buffer Region
Selected Parcels
Major Roads
Minor Roads
II
,,_:)k . ~"
II ;,
;1
I' ii
I
I
;1
#3516 JU N 2 2 201"1
CITY OF ORONO
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, July 18, 2011
6:30 o'clock p.m.
Council
Exhibit D
Schoenzeit asked whether there has been any communication with the neighbors or a schedule submitted
r arding the trucking.
Curtis 1 icated the Council will issue the conditional use permit and then an administrative per
be applie which requires the applicants to submit a trucking schedule.
Leskinen noted the engineer's r
Curtis indicated the engineer's report ca: out prior to the a cant calculating the area to be disturbed
and that it is the responsibility of the applic t to obtain permit. Curtis noted there is quite a steep
r than one acre. The applicant has demonstrated
Keenan Paulucci stated he had nothing t
Chair Schoenzeit osed the public hearing at 7 : 16 p.m.
Thiesse ved, Levang seconded, to recommend approval of Application #11-3515, enan &
Svei on behalf of Gina Paolucci, 320 Wood hill Road, subject to the City Engineer's
mmendations. VOTE; Ayes 6, Nays 0.
5. #11-3516 ROBERT SNYDER, 1513 BAY RIDGE ROAD, VARIANCE, 7:17 P.M. -7:36
P.M.
Tripp and Pam Snyder, Applicants, were present
Curtis stated the applicant is requesting a side setback variance to allow a garage addition to the home.
The addition consists of 966 square feet and is propo9sed to be located eight feet from the south lot line
where a 30-foot setback is required. The existing home is set back eight from the south lot line so it does
not meet the 30-foot principal structure side setback required within the LR-I A zoning district. The
addition to the home in the proposed location within the substandard setback is considered an expansion
of an existing nonconformity. A side yard setback is required in order to do the project as proposed.
Additionally, the applicant is proposing reductions in hardcover within the 75-250 foot zone in order to
accommodate the addition and remain at 25 percent.
The applicant's property is nonconforming with respect to area and width. The existing home does not
meet the required 30-foot side setback on either side lot line. The applicant is proposing a 26-foot deep
garage addition to the home in order to achieve additional living space . The proposed garage addition
within the substandard side setback area will not encroach closer than the existing home to the adjacent
Page8
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, July 18, 2011
6:30 o'clock p.m.
property, but the length of the encroachment will nearly double. An existing shed set back five feet from
the side lot line along the existing garage is proposed to be removed as part of this project .
The applicant's variance may be reasonable considering the location of the existing home on the property .
The proposed addition will result in 26 feet of additional massing along the south lot line . There are a
number of trees along the south side of the property which may afford adequate screening of the addition
from the adjacent property. Staff finds the location of the existing home and the width of the applicant's
property creates a unique circumstance not created by the applicant and that granting the applicant's
request is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the ordinance and will not alter the essential
character of the neighborhood .
In order to construct the addition , hardcover removals are necessary. The applicant has provided a
hardcover plan which results in a conforming level of hardcover. However, while the proposed driveway
meets the City's minimum standards, the configuration appears to be difficult to maneuver. The applicant
should address the proposed driveway configuration.
Issues for consideration:
I. A 10-foot setback is the minimum principal structure side setback permitted in any zoning
district. Should the addition be redesigned and constructed to meet a I 0-foot side setback?
2 . The applicant is proposing a driveway configuration which technically meets the City's driveway
hardcover minimum . However, there appears to be maneuverability difficulties.
Staff recommends approval of a side setback variance in order to construct the garage addition and
conduct hardcover removals as proposed. The Planning Commission should consider and make a
recommendation on whether an 8-foot setback is acceptable or if a I 0-foot setback should be required.
Tripp Snyder, Applicant, indicated they purchased the house approximately four years ago . Shortly after
the purchase the interior of the house was rewired to bring it up to code . As part of that renovation , the
hardcover was reduced on the property from approximately 35 percent in the 75-250 foot zone to
approximately 31 .7 percent. They are further proposing to reduce it down to just under 25 percent.
The garage that is being proposed sits on what is now I 00 percent hardcover. The portico would also sit
on 100 percent hardcover. Snyder indicated the structures they are proposing will not add any hardcover
whatsoever to the property. Along the south side of the property there is concrete along with a shed that
is approximately three feet wide . That will be removed as part of the construction. Snyder indicated they
have attempted to get under the 25 percent hardcover requirement, which is accomplished with this
proposal.
Snyder stated they are removing all of the hardcover that is currently used for excess parking. That area
could also be used as a turnaround. Bayridge Road is a private road with seven houses on the road . Their
house is next to the last house on the road and is located approximately 60 feet from the end of the road.
The two spaces in the proposed garage that are to the south are the ones that will be primarily used.
Snyder stated in his view due to the configuration that their builder and surveyor have proposed they feel
that both cars can be turned around adequately in that portion of the driveway or they could back down
the driveway. At the far north portion of the driveway you will not be able to turn around. Snyder stated
Page9
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, July 18, 2011
6:30 o'clock p.m.
they plan on using the third space as kind of an overflow parking when they have guests at the house and
also to store the riding lawn mower and snow blower. Snyder noted there is very little traffic on the road.
The house next to this house is for sale so there are some prospective people coming to look at it but there
are perhaps four to five cars every day that go past their house. Every lot on the road is I 00 feet wide
lots.
Schoenzeit asked whether he has discussed this project with the neighbors.
Snyder indicated he has spoken to one of the neighbors but that the other neighbor is seldom at the
property. The fence that is located on the neighbor's property line is in a state of disintegration and
should be taken down. They are proposing to replace that fence with a series of shrubs that would grow
to a height of eight or nine feet and provide screening between the two houses. Snyder indicated they
have not discussed that proposal with the neighbor.
Leskinen asked whether any attempt was made to comply with the encroachment.
Snyder stated technically they are in the two acre zone so the side setback requirement is 30 feet.
Physically it is possible to move the garage over a foot and a half, which would put it at the IO foot line,
but where it comes into the existing house is into the kitchen. If it is moved over another foot and a half,
they would be infringing up a bay window, which would require a redesign of the whole front side of the
house.
Thiesse asked if someone would come to visit the property if the expectation is that they would
completely back out of the driveway.
Snyder pointed out the road and the edge of the road. Snyder indicated they do have an area where guests
can park.
Feuss asked if there would be any additional hardcover in the area for the guests.
Snyder indicated that area would be grass.
Thiesse stated as it relates to moving the garage over another foot and a half, in his view it would really
not serve any purpose since the house is already there.
Schoenzeit asked if they are restricted from putting a jog in the structure.
Curtis indicated they are not.
Schoenzeit asked if the exterior of the garage would be compatible with what currently exists.
Thiesse asked how much of the concrete located on the south side will be removed.
Snyder indicated they will be removing I 00 percent of that. There currently is brick pavement and
plantings with plastic and rock, which will also be removed.
Schoenzeit asked whether there will be gutters or drain spouts on the garage.
------------------Page
10
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, July 18, 2011
6:30 o'clock p.m.
Snyder indicated there are gutters all the way along the house. It currently is a fairly gradual slope but
they will be making the area a little bit flatter or perhaps swale it.
Schoenzeit stated in his view it is important that the runoff from the garage stay on the applicant's
property.
Snyder concurred.
Curtis indicated the City Engineer will be reviewing that.
Levang noted the area was very wet when she visited the site.
Snyder stated they have a sprinkler system that comes on twice a week and that it may have been on
yesterday morning. With the high humidity, nothing dried out. Snyder indicated there will be gutters all
the way along the entire house. Snyder pointed out the area on the property where the swale is currently
located and stated that can be extended if necessary.
Curtis noted the City Engineer will look at the drainage and will make recommendations on how to
mitigate any adverse impacts to the neighbor.
Chair Schoenzeit opened the public hearing at 7:32 p.m.
There were no public comments regarding this application .
Chair Schoenzeit closed the public hearing at 7:32 p.m.
Feuss stated she likes the reduction in the hardcover. The applicant already has the existing
nonconformity and that there are practical difficulties given the small lot size.
Schwingler commented this proposal would also clean up the concrete and the little shed.
Thiesse noted the only affected property would be the property that is up for sale and that to his
knowledge the seller is not aware of the proposal.
Curtis stated the owner was notified.
Snyder stated the property has been for sale for the past three years.
Schoenzeit moved, Feuss seconded, to recommend approval of Application #11-3516, 1513 Bay
Ridge Road , granting of a side setback variance to allow a garage addition to the home subject to
Stafrs recommendations.
Schoenzeit encouraged the applicant to construct an appropriate sized turnaround.
Snyder indicated if they add more to the turnaround, they would be over the 25 percent hardcover.
Feuss commented that would then require them to come back for a hardcover variance.
Page
11
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, July 18, 2011
6:30 o'clock p.m.
Thiesse stated the hardcover requirements are primarily to protect the lake and that the water in this area
will not be going into the lake. Thiesse stated he would understand if they had to come back for a
hardcover variance .
Feuss stated that ultimately is their choice.
VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0.
LANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVES ATTENDING C
OUNCIL MEETINGS ON JUNE 27, 2011, AND JULY 11, 2011
e attended the June 27th City Council meeting and all item s were placed
Levang stated she att ded the July 11th meeting and reported that the Whippl pplication that was
approved by the Planni Commission variance was not approved by the C Council. The Whipple
property is located on Cas Point Road.
Curtis displayed the proposed g
Levang stated the issue with the Cou ii was what the garag ould be used for and that the Planning
Commission did not explore that at all · h the applicatio .
Thiesse noted he did ask what the garage wo d be d for and that in hi s view there was no practical
difficulty to ask for a garage of that size. ated the Planning Commission did not discuss it
beyond that .
Curtis stated the conversation of the Plan
Levang stated the garage would be d to store antique car nd as such would be a luxury. The City
Council did not feel the hardcove as reduced enough . The ·!Y Council also talked about a deck
located out front but was not di ussed in great detail.
the lakeshore side of the home in the 0-
Levang stated shew d like to use this as a learning tool in the future sot City Council does not
overrule the Plann · g Commission on other similar applications . Levang note the application was
eventually table .
that applicant has submitted a revised plan today requesting 30 percent h
1ficant in the driveway and a slight reduction in the size of the garage.
As · relates to the issues with the 0-75 foot zone and the nonconforming structure, Council M
served on the Planning Commission before the statutes were changed. If the City requires th
emoval of a nonconforming structure, the City would be required to compensate the property owne
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway
PO Box 66
NOTICE OF PLANN ING COMM ISS ION ACT IO N
ZONING FILE: 11-3516
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
952.249.4620 DATE OF NOTICE: July 19 , 2011
TO: Robert "Tripp" Snyder
1513 Bay Ridge Rd
Wayzata, MN 55391
TYPE OF REQUEST: Variance
DATE OF MEETING: July 18, 2011
COPIES:
The Orono Planning Commission voted on a motion to recommend approval of a side setback variance
8.4' from the side lot line for a garage addition as requested.
VOTE: 6 FOR 0 AGAINST
Applicant's next meeting is tentatively scheduled as : Monday, August 8, 2011
This is a City Council meeting. The meeting begins at 7 PM
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the
City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission . If you have questions, please
contact Planning & Zoning Coordinator, Melanie Curtis at mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us or 952 .249.4627 .
Subject: #11-3516, Robert "Tripp" Snyder, 1513 Bay Ridge Road,
Side Setback Variance
Public Hearing
Background
The applicant is requesting a side yard setback variance to permit a 966 square foot, garage
addition to the existing home . The addition is proposed to be 8 feet from the south lot line
where a 30 foot setback is required. The addition to the home in the proposed location within
the substandard setback is considered an expansion of an existing nonconformity; a side yard
setback variance is required in order to do the project as proposed .
Side Yard Setback Variance
The applicant's property is nonconforming with respect to area and width . The existing home
does not meet the required 30-foot side setback on either side lot line . The applicant is
proposing a 26 foot deep garage addition to the home in order to achieve additional living
space. While the proposed garage addition will not encroach closer than the existing home to
the adjacent property, the length of the encroachment will nearly double. An existing shed set
back 5' feet from the side lot line along the existing garage is proposed to be removed as part of
this project.
There are a number of trees along the south side of the property which may adequately screen
the addition from the adjacent property. Staff finds the location of the existing home and the
width of the applicant's property creates a unique circumstance not created by the applicant
and their request is in harmony with the purpose and will not alter the essential character of the
neighborhood.
In order to construct the addition hardcover removals are necessary. The applicant has
provided a hardcover plan which results in a conforming level of hardcover (25% within the 75'-
250' zone). However, while the proposed driveway meets the City's minimum standards, the
configuration appears to be difficult for maneuverability. The applicant should address the
proposed driveway configuration to the Planning Commission's satisfaction .
The planning commission should address the I es for Consideration within the staff report.
1. A O foot setback is the minimum rincipal struct etback permitt d in any
zo ing d' ,ct. S ould ddition be redesigned nd constructed to meet a 10 foot side
setback?
Staff recommends approval of a side setback variance in order to construct the garage addition
and conduct hardcover removals as proposed . Planning Commission should consider and make
a recommendation whether an 8' setback is acceptable or if a 10' setback should be required .
C:
0 ·--('Q
) ---.c :::s a. ....
0
~ > ca
"'C
:E
<(
C ·a.
Q)
C
C
Q)
I
0
>, -C ::::,
0
()
<U
0
Cl)
Q)
C
C
~
0
Q)
1il
u5
LEGAL NOTICE
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O.
Box 66
Crystal B\IY, r.'IN 55323
P!'!one (!!52) 249-4600 Fax
. (952) 249-4616
NOTICE ,OF ,
PUBLIC HEARING
PLANNING COMMISSION
The Orono Planning
Commission w ill hold a public
hearing in the Orono Counci l
Chambers at 2780 Kelley
Parkway on July 18, 2011 , -
beginning at 6 :30 p.m . on the
matter of review ing the follow-
ing land use applications and
vacation request :
• 11-3513 -Ryan Companies
US, Inc., 450 & 550 Old Crystal
Bay Road North, RR-1B zoning
dislrict, request a preliminary
and .final plal for Crystal Bay .
Business Center, Second
Addition in order to mqve the
common lot line between Lots
1 and ·2 Bloek 2 164-feetto the
south . Vacation -of lhe eJ<isling
'perimeter drainage . a'nd utilily
· ·e8sements · along the common
lot line· is also proposed . New
ea~ements a!ong th~ new lot
line will be required i n conjunc-
t ion wilh the plat.
· • 11-3514 -Briari Peter~. 1978
Shadywood Road, LR-1C zon-
. ing district, f !lqueli.lS a number
of variances in ' orde'r to con-
struct. a new; detached garage
on the ' property. The following
vafiance are · requested : a
structural coverage variance lo
allow 17% slruclural coverage
where 15% is normally allowed
and .19% currently exists ;, a
variance within lhe 0-75' zone
to allow 25 .5% hardcover
where 0% is allowed and 31 %
currently exists ; a variance
with in the 75 '-250 ' zone lo
allow 62'% where 25% is nor-
mally allowed and 80% current-
, ly exists ; a rear yard setback
variance to allow a rear set-
baq~ of 9 .7 feet where a HI-
foot setback is ·requ ired .
• 11 -3515 -Keenan & Sveiven
on behalf of Gina Paulucci, 320
Woodh ill Road, RR-1 B zon ing
district, requests a cond itional
use permit in order to conduct
land alteration activities and
grading in excess of 500 cubic
yards of materia f in order to
replace the ex isting driveway.
• 11-3516 -Robert Snyder,
1513 Bay Ridge Road, LR-1A
zoning districts, requests a
side yard setback var iance in
order to construct an addition
to the eici sting home 8.4. feet .
from the side lot line where a
30 -foot setback is · normally
required . and an 8 .4' setback
currently exists .
All persons wishing to be heard
(/) Q) I Q)
>-.cO o, ro---o
Cl) ,._ CL a>
0 w "§ £ a> Io roa,1-c 0 >, ~
I °O Q) (/) a>a,-ro ... ·-::::, ·s ~ «1 ui
o-ro-3 ~::::,U)ro ..... .....
"C Q) ·-u ro C Cl)
Cl) 0 ~
'+-Q)
0 "O Q) :1 f ..... Q) ~1
C _Q ~ = 0 a._ ::::, E ,._ C: Q) (/) (/) ._ ro ro
!i?-cc.c3
> C 3 O Cl)roo-oa5
~1:: ~ lii .o
::::, Q) .... "C
-c O> a> ro a>
O> ro a. o 1il
C-c ~Cl)cn
'ai gi (/) ~ Q)
.0 ·;:: 3 C '-. o a> ·-ro
co.c c~.c
-u (/) ::::, Q) -·-... ro.c-o.c
Q) -C 3 "Oc,._::::,(/) crooo_ ~ .!Q <ii~~
CL a> -55 a:" a>
.c .c = w .c
:t:::cil.ow-~ ,s lz o
a>o-ro-
£ ro o ~ = (/) (/) .g
<llroa>u
.C C = :t:Cl)CQ.
3 C ·-Q. o ~ ro "C:;:; a>ro>.'-=u.oa> Q. ·-.c E::::-015 o ro a>
u ::::,"C"O
Cl) o-S C ro O ro
.c O> ... -
._ C Q. f'-.
Q):;:; 0 Q.::::, (/) .
ro-ro<( a.:;:; -(/) (/) ... -C')
3ca,C')
Q) 0 Q. ·-ci cUroC\Ja,
Q) (/) Q.~"C .c-Cl)<(C
1-c3 ..... 0>
--:-a> a> C') E
<(EcC')ro
0
C
0
0
0 -0
"C
Q) -C ·;::
Q.
Q)
.c
I-
~
a)
0 C\J
CX) .....
>, s ,
Cl
C ·;::
ro
Q)
I
.S:1
]5
::::,
CL
0
Q) u
~ z
~ ~ 3
E ~ ~ ~ .0 'iii
0::::, (/) u Q. Q)
Q) "O
.C C
-ro E
0 .::
"O
Q) -C -·-::::, ... u Q.
(/) (/)
ro ro
3 3
u u ::::,
Cl)
-g -g .....
i3 ro o ro -,._ -... ~ 1il ~ Q)
(/) ro a> ·-Q. 3
.c (/) .c
.S:1 3 ~
j ~ Q)
~
"E
::::,
1il
U)
"O
Q)
.c
.!Q
]5
::::,
Q. -!!? .;::
Cl)
ro
3
:::
0 "O
C\J Q) .c
.!Q
:0 >, ::::, ro
Q. "E
"O .a
C ro ro U)
"O O>
Q) C c '5 -1 ·;::::::, ::::, 0.13
-:, ._ C
Q) ·-
'+-;i:: "C O al C
~ ~ ro
"O Q) 0
.c -
"01-;;; ~ C ro "O
C\J 3 ::i
Q) -g 1il
£ ro U)
0
C\J
s ,
0
~
"C ~,
Q)
.c -
are encourag~d t;;-:-at~nd thes ;-·1
meetings . This is not a final
agenda and is subject \o
change prior to the hearings .
Written comments are acciipt-
ed and should be submitted to
the City of Orono by, July 12 ,
2011 if pos1>ible , lnt'!rested
persons may review the appli -
cation at CUy offices . For an
appointment , please call (952)
249-4620 .
Posted at: Orpno City Offjces
Crystal Bay Post Office '·
Lqng Lake Post Office
Navarre Post Office
City of Orono
By : Planning Commission
Melanie Curtis
Planning & Zoning Coord inator
(Published i n The Laker and
The Pioneer newspapers, July '
2, 2011) .
-C
Q)
Ji!
"C
Q)
N ·;::
0 .c -::::,
<( Cl)
:E -
' E 0 ..
0 0~
'-Lt? 0 0 It) C: .... 'I"""·-
Ill fh t
CD i.: a.
gi ~~ai ca i,sE r-,: r-:
·-Wu,
c:~ g!l5~
0 E O ;: ~ ·-E .c fl! GI °tu o ~E;:
E U OGIGI
-> > ... >, ;!: 0 ·-0 .c ·ca.ell!
--o~-n,GI c:·nig>-... o
-C. ·-.C O 0 '-"'C ... ~
Cl>,S!GIGl'Olll
-n,C.,-GI-
C'CI '-oo~:g CJ:-ou,:mo .~ ui fl!~:;:;
..... 'I""" G) u ·-
·~ ~ 'lii ~ :g
taGl'-cijnl u g E ::i ~ -c.::ing
~ll)Etaw
;!: GI ·;;c GI
0 j5 fl! 'lii
..J ~ :E a:: -(U--~ a.~r;,
C:
0 ;;
"'a
J ---.c
:::s a. -0
:!:
~
"C
~
C ·5..
O>
C
C
Q)
I
0
>, -C ::J
0
0
CtS -0 en
Q)
C
C
~
0
Q)
~
u5
LEGAL NOTICE
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O.
Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax
(952) 249-4616
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEAR-
ING
PLANNING COMMISSION
The Orono Planning
Commissjon will ' hold ' a public
1ll.lll;;i!J rni-tih t\~thA!.P QP;~s,1turici1
c q-arn1Jws::·tif "~2~80 !~~11 1e y ls>1£hth f 0·~Pluly ··1s.,,~11,
beginning at 6 :30 p .m . on the
matter of reviewing the follow-
ing Jand use applications and
vacation request:
• 11-3513 -Ryan Companies
US, Inc., 450 & 550 Old Crystal
B ay Road North, RR-1 B zoning
district, request a preliminary
and fina l plat for Crystal Bay
Business Center, Second
Addition in order to move th e
common lot line between Lots
1 and 2 Bl ock 2 164-feet to the
south . Vacation of the existing
p erimeter drainage and utility
easements alo ng the co mm on
lot line is a l so proposed. New
easements along the new l ot
line will be required in conjunc-
cnQ>WO>
>...cI O> CtS -"O en-I-a,
0 -£ Q) <ll 3 roQl..CO
0 >, -C c O en..:,::
oo.CtS=
-E C .a
EQ)3en
0 "O o CtS ..
3cc..C3
ena1..:.::-oO
>,-..... 5ai -C Q) ,u .O -5Cl>a. ·-o Olco$CD O>ma.o-
.~ "O (I) Cl)$
a,a>30>cn
.D -~ Q) § ~
c· 0 C ·-ctl
0£ Q)~..C
~3£-o .Q
<l) w C ..C
-oc 0 ::J3
C (1j O Cll ~ -~ ci> ~ u
0. (l)~(c°~
..c..C:=WO>
:!::1ij.C~£
,<!? ..c ::J <( -_._Q.....JO
I "tJ (I) en
O>(l)-ro ·= ;;= .a ..
::J = Ctl en o-en ..... 3 ~ ::J Cl) CtS
a, o-ro-
£ CtS 0~
=enen.D CtSroa,~
..C C ·-
:!:: en co. 3 C ·-Q.
"O -~ ~ Ctl
Q)~ >, .....
=0.00> a.·-..c
E = -o o o ro (I)
(.) ::J "O "O en O" .> C ro O ro
.c O> ..... -
,.__ C C..t-,. (I):;:; 0 c.. ::J en . g_1= CtS ~ en en._:-('")
3 C O> ('")
a,Oc..--cj
C (.) ro N (I)
a,enc.~-o ..c-en<(C 1-c3,_(I)
--:-(1)0>('")E
<( E C ('") CtS
0
C
0
0
0 -c3
"O
(I) -C ·.:: c..
Q) ..c
I--m
ti o n w ith the plat. zoning d istricts, requests a
side yard · setback 'varia nce in
order to const ruct an addition
t o the existing home 8 .4 feet
from the side lot line where a
30-foot setback is normally
required and an 8.4 ' setback
currently exists .
• 11 -35 14 -Brian Peters , 1978
Shadywood· Road . LR'-1 C zon-
ing distri ct, requests · a number
of variances in order to con-
st ruct a new, detached garage
on the property. The following
va r iance are requ ested : , .. a
structu ra l coverage variance to All pers o ns wishing to be he ard
a ll ow 17% structural coverage are e ncouraged to attend th ese
whe re 15% is normally allowed meetings . This is not a final
and 19% curren tl y exists ; c! agenda and is subject to
,:,wiihJJ1 -l !;le ~q,_7,5';,f 0/1e · ,. chal'l Wr-i Pri 9r. to !~e hearings.
;,· '25 :5~~~Tfllo ver. . Wr jttern.':co·mments .ate'.':a~pt-erfl:J0/01"§~-Mib"ti,,'Wcl· an·· '§'f Vo·-----·;;a !t'ifc{""itf'o'uTct"b0e~?t'i J:;'mlttell to
currently exis t s ; a va ria n ce the C ity of Orono by, July 12,
within the 75 '-250' zone t o 2011 if pos sib le . Interested
·allow 62 % where 25 % is no r-persons may review the appli-
mally allowed and 80 % current-cation at City offices . Fo r an
ly exists ; a rear yard SEJ !p!1 9,k, ,app oin tment , please ca ll (952)
variance t o allow a rear set-249-4620 .
back of 9 . 7 feet w h ere a 1 O-
tool setback is required . Posted at : Orono City Offices
Crystal Bay Post Office
Lo ng Lake Post Offi ce
Navarre Post 'Office
City of Orono
By : Planning Commission
Melanie Curtis
Planning & Zoning Coordinator
• 11-3515 -Keenan & Sveiven
on behalf of Gina Pau lucci , 320
Woodhill Road , RR-1 B zoning
district , requests a conditional
use permit in o rder t o conduct
land alteration activities and
grading in excess of 500 cubic
yards of material i n order to
rep l ace the existing d r iveway.
• 11-3516 -Robe rt Snyder,
1513 Bay Ridge Road , LR-1A
(Published in The Laker a nd
The Pioneer newspapers, July
2, 20 11)
"O (I) ·cu o en C .. _o~
0 "O (I)
T"" .-en (I) (I)
0 C ..C 3
N E ~ (I)
co ::J .c > o ::J "cii
T"" u a. en
>,
(I) "O ~ :'i .C C (.) ~ -, -CtS :J Ctl
O> E en "O
C 0 "O .....
·.:: ..... Q) :J ---ro -C Ctl
(I) :J "i:: U)
I (.) Q. "O
-~ en en (I)
~~T""
.c :0 -~ ::J :0 0. "O "O 1c ::J
0 a. (.) CtS ..... -(I) CtS • $ ~ (.) -..... '§ -Q)..:.:: -CtS 0. Q) en z -~ g_ ~ cu 3 ..c Cl) .c ::: -~ 3 () .c (I) <ti 3 C Q)
..... ] f
T"" Q)
0 "O
N (I) .c en
ii ~
::J cu c.. "O .....
"O ~
C CU
Ctl Cl)
"O 0)
0> C -·-C "O -·c ::J
::J C..<3 -, ,.__ C
O> ·-
-.:i:: "O O Ctl C
>, O> Ctl
Ctl Q> 0
"O ..c -
-oli ~ C 3 "O
N :;i
Q) "O -.C C Cl!
-Ctl Cl)
T""
T""
0
N
::J -, -0
>,
Ctl
"O ~,
(I) .c -
-C
(I)
O>
~Ii .....
0 ..c
:5
<(
e
0 u ...
.E
fl) ...
G)
fl) :,
ci ..c:
II) u • C:
II)·-...... w G)
..:: a.
G) "' • :i:: a, a, ca . ,-..
iii E~in ·u G)·•W
C: ~ ~ii OE ..ocaa> .::e ~E::
ca 8 .E~~ E ~ . ~ _g -~ O"tl.c-caa>
It-·-0 ~""' 0 .E [.5..0,E g
Q)!~alai~
is f!o~e>~ a: j"l=:;~~
·-II) u ·-~ ~ ! ~:g cn ...... -a,
..!!!~e§.c
Uca:,tjU
1iiltecaJI
G) ·-G) :!:GI>< ...
0 :i5 ca ca
.J ca :E a: -:-0-r,
.::.. ci~-
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss.
)
CITY OF ORONO )
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I, Monica Fadness, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby
certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #11-3516 was mailed to the
attached list of property owners.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 8thth day of July,
2011 .
~~(Lac~ MoicaA. Fadness
RUN DA TE: 6/21/2011 HENNEPIN CL iY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY owl.
38 10-117-23 11 0002
HENNEPIN CO REGIONAL RR AUTH
38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
HENNEPIN COUNTY
REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORJTY
417 5TH STN SUITE 320
MINNEAPOLIS MN 5540 I
38 10-11 7-23 34 0007
TWILA B GERMANSON ET AL
1501 BAY RJDGE RD
TWILA B GERMANSON
DONALD M GERMANSON
P OBOX91
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 10-117-23 34 0014
BERTA KVAMME REVOCABLE TRUST
2050 SHORELINE DR
BERTA KVAMME
2050 SHORELINE DR
WAYZATAMN 55391
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTE
AS IT APPEARS THIS DA TE ON THE R~ORD
38 10-117-23 330006
GREGG W/DENISE E STEINHAFEL
2285 NORTH SHORE DR
GREGG W/DENISE E STEINHAFEL
2265 NORTH SHORE DR
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 10-117-23 340008
ROBERT SNYDER
1513 BAY RIDGE RD
ROBERT SNYDER
1513 BAY RIDGE RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 10-117-23 340016
BERTA KVAMME REVOCABLE TRUST
38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
BERTA KVAMME
2050 SHORELINE DR
WAYZATA MN 55391
DATE: JUN 2 1 2011 BY ·/-,,' ,..._/~;R,,-,~-k,,-~~---'f'~ C.!
(
, LIST)
38 10-11 7-23 34 0006
SUSAN M KERBER & JOHN C HOLM
1485 BAY RJDGE RD
SUSAN M KERBER & JOHN C HOLM
1485 BAY RJDGE RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 10-11 7-2 3 340009
SCOTT E LEIFERMAN
1525 BAY RIDGE RD
SCOTT E LEIFERMAN
I 525 BAY RJDGE RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 15-117-23 22 0001
NORTH SHORE MEADOWS LLC
2165 NORTH SHORE DR
NORTH SHORE MEADOWS LLC
PO BOX 67
CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323
PAGE: I
#3516
RECEIVED
JUN 2 2 2011
CITY OF ORONO
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616
NOTICE
The Orono Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Orono Council Chambers at
2780 Kelley Parkway on July 18, 2011, beginning at 6:30 p .m . on the matter of reviewing the
following land use applications and vacation request:
11-3513 Ryan Companies US, Inc ., 450 & 550 Old Crystal Bay Road North, RR-1B zoning
district, request a preliminary and final plat for Crystal Bay Business Center, Second
Addition in order to move the common lot line between Lots 1 and 2 Block 2 164-feet
to the south . Vacation of the existing perimeter drainage and utility easements along
the common lot line is also proposed. New easements along the new lot line will be
required in conjunction with the plat.
11-3514 Brian Peters, 1978 Shadywood Road, LR-1C zoning district, requests a number of
variances in order to construct a new, detached garage on the property. The
following variances are requested : a structural coverage variance to allow 17%
structural coverage where 15% is normally allowed and 19% currently exists; a
variance within the 0-75' zone to allow 25 .5% hardcover where 0% is allowed and
31 % currently exists ; a variance within the 75 '-250' zone to allow 62% where 25% is
normally allowed and 80% currently exists; a rear yard setback variance to allow a
rear setback of 9.7 feet where a 10-foot setback is required .
11-3515 Keenan & Sveiven on behalf of Gina Paulucci, 320 Woodhill Road, RR-1 B zoning
district, requests a conditional use permit in order to conduct land alteration activities
and grading in excess of 500 cubic yards of material in order to replace the existing
driveway.
11-3516 Robert Snyder, 1513 Bay Ridge Road, LR-1A zoning districts, requests a side yard
setback variance in order to construct an addition to the existing home 8.4 feet from
the side lot line where a 30-foot setback is normally required and an 8.4' setback
currently exists .
All persons wishing to be heard are encouraged to attend these meetings . This is not a final
agenda and is subject to change prior to the hearings. Written comments are accepted and
should be submitted to the City of Orono by , July 12 , 2011 if possible . Interested persons may
review the appl ication at City offices . For an appointment, please call (952) 249-4620.
City of Orono
By: Plann i ng Commission
Melanie Curtis
Planning & Zoning Coordinator
To be published in The Laker & The Pioneer Newspapers on July 2, 2011.
Posted at: Orono City Offices
Crystal Bay Post Office
Long Lake Post Office
Navarre Post Office
27 June 2011
Robert Snyder
1513 Bay Ridge Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
REQUEST FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CI TY of ORONO
Municipal Offices
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono , MN 55356
Mailing Address:
P.O . Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
SUBJECT: Zoning Application #11-3516
The City of Orono is required to notify you within fifteen (15) business days as to the status of your
application for variances for your property located at 1513 Bay Ridge Road . You have submitted all of
the information required to complete the application. However after a cursory review by the City
Engineer it appears that some additional detail will be needed to complete their review.
Please have the survey revised to provide an enlargement of the area where the addition is proposed;
and the proposed overhangs on the addition and the existing home on the south side should be shown
on the survey. It should also be noted that the proposed driveway appears to be difficult to maneuver.
Please assure that the reductions in the driveway, the taper and the width will be functional once
completed.
Application #11-3516 is technically complete, however in order to avoid an unnecessary charge for
engineering review please have your survey updated to reflect the changes noted above. If you wish to
proceed with your application please submit the items requested above by July 6, 2011 at noon in order
to remain on the July 13th Planning Commission agenda. Please contact me at 952.249.4627 or email at
mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
City of Orono
Melanie Curtis
Planning & Zoning Coordinator
Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fax (952) 249-4616
www.c1 .orono .mn.us
City of Orono
Pre-Application Meeting Form
(This form is to be completed by a City Planner during your pre-application meeting .)
For Office Use Onl
City Planner:
PC Date :
C
Meeting Date/Time:
What is the purpose of a pre-appl tion meeting?
Pre -application meetings aid the applicant in preparing a complete proposal , inform them of the
procedures and requirements of the city code, and identify policies or regulations that create opportunities
or problems for the proposal.
PROPERTY INFORMAT ION: \r--12-. °= rt R,.~
Site Address: J_:::z_1:L .t;...l~jt V: ( ~
Property ldentificati ~N~ber (PIN): ____ 1 _________________ _
Zoning District: L&-\ l1 Size of Property:
DESCRIPTION OF R ~E :
D Average Setback ide Yard Setback
D Hardcover 0 '-75' D Hardcover 75'-250'
D Lot Coverage D Lot Area
D Other:
D Rear Yard Setback
D Hardcover 250 '-500'
D Lot Width
D Lake/Front Yard Setback
D Hardcover 500 '-1000'
Applicant's
Initials : HARDSHIP: Applicant and/or Owner has received the Hardship Documentation
.,.__ ____ ...,_ __ _, Form , understands it as it has been explained to them , and is aware that it must be
Owner's completed and submitted in conjunction with their formal variance application .
Initials:
Applicant's BILLS AND ESCROW: Applicant and/or Owner shall pay for consultant expenses
Initials : incurred in review of this application and/or additional staff time not covered in
Owner's i!Jjtia licat'on fee, as well as provide an escrow in the amount of
Initials: $ to guarantee payment of the above .
OTHER INFORMATION:
*Please note: Your variance application will NOT be accepted without a pre-application meeting during
which this form w ill be co ted by ity s ff.
Owner Signature:
-9 -
Date:
Date :
#3516
ECfEIVED
JUN222011
C ITY OF ORONO
--------~~---· -----
Hennepin County Mailing Labe l Receipt :1
,i Provided By: Taxpayer Services Department
Company or Homeowner Name: Robert Snyder .!
1 Contact Person : •
Print Date: 6/21/2011 1 :43:52 PM
("2b-:.) TOTAL COST: $25.00
·-I,
!I
II I
ii Contact Address: 1513 BAY RIDGE RD Orono, MN 38
1
11 Contact Phone: 309-7050
I !I
_________________ !!
Comments:
Buffer Distance: 150ft Mail Label Count: 9
PID LIST:
38 10-117-23 11 0002 , 38 10 -117-23 33 0006 , 38 10 -117 -23 34 0006 , 38 10 -117-23 34 0007, 38 10 -117 -23 34 0008, 38 10 -117 -23 34 0009 , 38 10-117 -23 34 0014,
ii
I:
,,
I ' I
•i I,
q
1,
•' I
I
38 10-117 -23 34 0016, 38 15-117-23 22 0001 ,
PAI
JUN 1:; LLJ,i
TAXPAYER SERVICES
HENN::P [~I CCU!\!"!'Y '.\11\!
lj t------
I'
i
I .
I
I
1!
'1
===========R=EC ~VED J
#3516 JUN 2 2 2011
CITY OF ORONO
CITY OF ORONO
2750 KELLEY PARKWAY
ORONO, MN 55356-
PERMIT NO.: 2011-00508
DATE ISSUED: 06/22/2011
(952) 249-4600 FAX: (952) 249-4616
: 1513BAYRIDGERD
: 10-117-23-34-0008
ADDRESS
PIN
LEGALDESC : REG. LAND SURVEY NO. 0192
: LOT 000 BLOCK 000
PERMIT TYPE : ESCROW FEE -APPLICANT
PROPERTY TYPE : RESIDENTIAL
CONSTRUCTION TYPE : ESCROW FEE -APPLICANT
NOTE: THIS $2500 ESCROW PAYMENT IS TIED TO ZONING APPLICATION # 11-3516
APPLICANT
SNYDER, ROBERT
1513 BAY RIDGE RD
WAYZATA, MN 55391-
SNYDER, ROBERT
1513 BAY RIDGE RD
WAYZATA , MN 55391-
OWNER
AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT
The work for which this permit is issued shall be performed according to
the approved plans and s pecifications, applicable C ity approvals, and the
State Building Code. This permit is for only the work described and does
not grant permission for additional or related work which requires separate
permits. All provisions oflaws and ordinances governing this type of work
s hall be compied with whether or not specified herein . This permit will
expire and become null and void if construction authorized is not
commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance, or if construction is
s us pended for a period of 180 days at any time after work has commenced.
The applicant is respon s ible for ass uring all required inspections are
requested in conformance with the State Building Code. This permit may be
revoked at any time for due cause.
Applicant Permitee Signature Date
ESCROW FEE -APPLICANT
TOTAL
Issued By Signature
SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE .
Date
2,500.00
2,500.00
APPLICATION ESCROW AGREEMENT
Zoning Application # l l 3 81 y?
AGREEMENT made this '14 day of -=-J:....1tl.~~~--· and between the CITY OF
ORONO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City'') and .J..+.::..=""'6od-___.."-'---=Q.a,µ..~t9e..=e::.-=---------
[a corporation -optiona~ ("Applicant").
Recitals
sting the City to
611:e 6em. /#A'~
3. The City is willing to commence its review of the application and incur costs associated with said
review only if the Applicant establishes an escrow to ensure reimbursement to the City of its costs.
NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. DEPOSIT OF ESCROW FUNDS. Contemporaneously with the execution of this Escrow
Agreement, the Applicant shall deposit $?{;~a:::, ~ with the City. All accrued interest, if any, shall be paid to
the City to reimburse the City for its cost in administering the escrow account.
2. PURPOSE OF ESCROW. The purpose of the escrow is to guarantee reimbursement to the City
for all out-of-pocket costs the City has incurred (including planning, engineering, or legal consultant review) or will
incur in meeting with the Applicant, reviewing the plans, and preparing agenda packet material for City Council
review of application # H -65] (p . Eligible expenses shall be consistent with expenses the
Applicant would be responsible for under a zoning and subdivision application .
3. MONTHLY BILLING. As the City receives consultant bills for incurred costs , the City will in turn
send a bill to the Applicant. Applicant shall be responsible for payment to the City within 30 days of the
Applicant's receipt of bill.
4. DISBURSEMENT FROM ESCROW ACCOUNT. In the event that the Applicant does not make
payment to the City within the timeframe outlined in #3 above, the City may draw from the escrow account without
further approval of the Applicant to reimburse the City for eligible expenses the City has incurred . The City shall
notify the Applicant of such draw and the nature of the expense for which the reimbursement is being made . If
the Escrow amount falls below 75% of the original escrow amount the Applicant shall deposit additional sums as
directed by the City, or the City shall discontinue all review.
5. CLOSING ESCROW. The Balance on deposit in the escrow, if any, shall be returned to the
Applicant when the review has been completed.
6. CERTIFY UNPAID CHARGES. If the project is abandoned by Applicant, or if the eligible
expenses incurred by the City exceed the amount in escrow, the City shall have the right to certify the unpaid
balance to the subject property pursuant to Minn. Stat. §§ 415.01 and 366.012.
AP·P~LI ~T/O~E . . ,L_
By . ---------------
It :-~~~~~~~~~~~
-10 -#3516
Easy Peel® Labels
Use Avery® Template 5160®
38 10-117-23110002
HENNEPIN COUNTY
REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY
417 5TH ST N SUITE 320
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55401
38 10-117-23 34 0007
TWILA B GERMANSON
DONALD M GERMANSON
POBOX91
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 10-117-23 34 0014
BERTA KVAMME
2050 SHORELINE DR
WAYZATA MN 55391
ttiquettes fadles a peler
Utllisez le gabarit AVERY8 51609
i
I ., I Bend along line to •
expose Pop-up Edge™ ! A
FeedPaper -
38 10-11 7-23 33 0006
GREGG W/DENISE E STEINHAFEL
2265 NORTH SHORE DR
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 10-11 7-23 340008
ROBERT SNYDER
1513 BAY RIDGE RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 10-117-23 340016
BERTA KVAMME
2050 SHORELINE DR
WAYZATAMN 55391
#3516
• Sens de
l'h:a,nAmAnt
Repllez a la hachure afin de I
reveler le rebord Pop-up™ I
@ AVERY® 5160® l
38 10-117-23 340006
SUSAN M KERBER & JOHN C HOLM
1485 BAY RIDGE RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 10-11 7-23 340009
SCOTT E LEIFERMAN
1525 BAY RIDGE RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 15-117-23 220001
NORTH SHORE MEADOWS LLC
PO BOX67
CRYSTALBAYMN 55323
RECEIVED
JUN 2 2 2011
CITY OF ORONO
www.avery.com
1-SDO-GO-AVERY
N
N
~
C)
O'
0 m ..,,.
< m
C
l:XlSTII\G
House
LEFT ELEVATION
flBERCfWfNT
StlAA.fS
FRONT ELEVATION
"/Ji3' .. f'-0'
12
e [Tv.
RIGt1T ELEVATION
MATCl'1EX1STING
51DING i TRIM
ROOF Vl:lffS A5 RfQ'D
f't:RCODE
EXl5il.llG
GAi',AGf
IB,;-T·-0'
114'•1'·0'
DISCLA IMER
IN PRfPAAATIO~ Of THIS l'lAA' EVERY
AmMPI H/15 aEEN ~.AD!: TO 1W01D
MISTMfS. DESIGNER CANNOT GUARANTEE
AGAINST r:U~AN ERROR. CQNiRACTOR iO
VERli"Y ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS
AND8t:RE51'0N516lf r0RTHE 5AMf
TH ESE DfSIGNS, COHCEPTS AND
5f'f.Cl fiCATION5 AKE: l~SlRLIMU..'TS Of
5!:RViC E AND "5 SU01 ~EMAIN TNf
O:ClUSIVI! l'R.Orf:RTY Of COOITTRY ll.lMB::R
AND Af..f. NOT TO er COi'IED WITtlOUT THt
~EN CONS[NT Of cour,.'Tli:'( LUM&R.
;;
~
~ <ii ci.l...:
~
t
~ ~
6
ti ~
8
:/.l ::;~ o z
.. I: Q
2 ~~ ~ ~;
8 ca ~
=-!
~! --.
·~ad, ~i"' IIJ !~; ,,, u~H f
ziH! ~!Ii· -i' "'' IIJ I
Q'
•
Of 4
BASE MENT PLAN
O'
:,/1
I
5C.'?..5. 12'CONC .W.
0\'20',f;'CONC .FTG
~
EXl5Tit-.G ti0U5!
I , I :~':
I ' L __
11~-1fl ; 3• • .i•
11?1 1
lij
I I
1'1
I ) I
I i I
1, I
I I
1:1
I , I
I , I
I I
I , I
1: L __
2'-2 1/2'
~. JE!i
~~·
I C!G.G'CONC .51.l(.
4CF5 .3'CONC .BLK
l b',3"CONC.fiG
EX15flNG
GA.RAGE
23'-"'
NfW
~
ROOfTRU55E.5
" i
:t'.3'M.0.
~
IUNEXO,VATW I
I C.~-5. !?CONC. 6-lf..
4 CR5 12' CONC. Bl!,,
20' ~ f!J' CONC . FTG
l b'-3'M.0 .
32'·0'
ICR5. b'CO\C . Blt:...
4 CR5 . 3' CONC. 6lX.
1G·~vco-.:c FTG:
2',2 1/2 '·
" ~
"
114,;.·f'-O' 2
Of '
;o
~ L...: m 0 :z -,.,
N
0 N
:::0 "' 0 C)
z
0
e
11 '-0'
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
~
[}l',/,t,(,~
~
II
l 1 ~
II ~ : : ~ ~ ~g~ : i Ii
II
II
II
II
II
II
DECOR.A.TIVE
STRUCTlJRAl
COW.V.N5\'f~FY
0E51Gt-lWlfHONNER
~
~
:w:-i-0r,o~:
I I
2-9 112'MLH
b'-10'
ROOf TRUSSES
~
~TING
GAJtO.GE
RfM(M.O:i500G0Vt:D ~-
23'-0'
NEW
~
4' CONC . ~LR.. Sl>~
W/fu:b-10/JOW.WM
r ,,.-0',7'-0'0Vr10.DR. -,
I I
I I
I I
2-11 710'!.4!.11
14'-10' t0'-4'
32'-0'
~
w.-rJY
0 ....,
0
"1'1
0
:::0
0 z
0
N
N
r--:>
C)
C,..TfGORY I MW1ANiCAI. t APPltA.fJCE ttQtJIR.EMOOS
1DfFINED 6Y M!NNt50TA 5T.ATE 5TATun. Cr'»i'fR 407)
RfQ\J,RfS A MECr1A'4tCAl VfN TILATION ~\'STEM W ICH RC:PLACf5, 5Y
Oj~CT OR. l~DIFtfCT MEANS, AIR rROM hABIT~l! ROO\l w,n, O\.liDOOR.
A!R . (Tr:15 AUOWS :"Olit.it":f U5f Dr fXH.\U5T ~LY'\lt"NTILATION, A5
WELL "5 AN AU( 0,Ct(i\./<IG~ OR ttf-'T l:fCCVERY VfNTIIAT~
RfWRfS D:RfCT VfNT, POM~R Vl'NT ~ Sf>.l!D COYMTION l'ti r:N1£:t .
WAJfRnEAll:ilOR flRU'\.ACffG,l,5/
Ir 6J.Y 5NG\.f EX11,1.UST Of:VIC!: (EG ffiO',EN rMI OR DRY!:!:) 0\1:R
300CLl61C rm n:11: MINUTE (CfMJ 15 IN51A.U.fD , A S~Ai.tD
COWBLl5TION fURNACE MUST 6f INSTAf.LW OR /iN ALT!rJ./ATIVE
MAl'..f-UP SOURCE MU5i Bf USED
fNGlt,,ffRfDROOrTRtJSSES
WlfNEKGYNEEl@ 2'-C!O.C .
l12'W.Af~6D.5HTG.
J5,fl:U
ICf CWATfltSt!lflD
A5i'1A..T5r11'4Glf.5
2i,;,suBFASC 1,1.
.O.LVM 50ffiT J rA5()A
CONT.50tflTVl'!4T
~GID Wl~D WA511 flAA.~~R
AlRCt.t!'E
l'-0'
12
•1
2;;.0-
,
. ,:_.,.-,,,
.,,:_..,/ ,,.,,,,,.
~~1,;'}-'
~' 1w i I i i i i i i i 1 i? ¢v----------,.-=----=
6U!tDI NG SECTION
.:•cooc.
rLR.5 LA6
51:f eUI LDf~ SPEC!l'lCATICN rcR BIJllC:1$ MA rf~Al5
C,1,1!~ ! BUllDiNG ENVW)PE REOIJIR.E'lfNT5
!D"Jmo,,-B6hi6.ii:.tn>m~1i·,01
C,l,TfGORY I lt.'CO~i'.AitS .li !R SE>!.iNG AND Wl.'JD WA511
WEA.5URE5 PINO R!OUtR!S MEChAN/C;..L VfNTILAT ::>N. A CATff.0!1:r" I
NO'JSf ~ 8lJllT ro l'ROTfCT Tl1f PERfORW>NC! or !~STALLED
TnfRMPiL IKSUlAilON rROM Ofil:RJORl>T~ elYMOISTURf ~DW1ND
WASli . Tt-15 i"f'.OTECTION ~ l'RCMDtO BY AC0'li!W05 VAPOR
IL~A.RDER. ..VlD AIR !).IAA.fR. ON l iif NffR.iOR "-~DA. COt.'TIIJJ::lllS
BARRIER ON Tf1f OOfRIOR f'R:OT!CTlt.G IG,iJ~T Vr"ND W'81. A
MECHM'ICAL vtNTllATION 5'1'5TfM r5 P!O!JR!D AND .ADDITION/\1.
M'f't.lAt.:CfS R!CUHl • .flJtNTS AS DE5CR16W AOOVf ...11..f PfQJIRED .
fNVUOrE !~fO\JlfQVENTS A.~·
I 1NTERiok. VArOf:, RtiARDER 0N INSUI..ATW CflUNG, WAUS il'-D
fLOO~.
2. CONTINUOUS AIR WJJERAT f.ll PltJM~NG ANO 11EATING
FENET~il(.)N5
3. f(Rf 5TOf'5 MUST 6E lt!STAU.fOTO &OC!:. AIR '-'CVfWENT INTO Tt'lf
All~
4. PfNEiR>TIONS 1N ·he 6Ull.DNG f",\l!:.Cf'f f0Rfl1CTR!CAl M,0
TfLfCOW,MUNI CAnQN rov.PMft.T rexcm rOR fl.fCTRJCA.I.. OOXE5
il'sD f:W MOUSING) WU5l 6f SOOD TO l'RfVENT AIR.Lf/.JJ<G~.
5 Wll-.'D WASH &-R.R!ER ~QUlltfD AT THf OOEIOOR EDGE Of Am e
INSULATION
N!WGAAAG~
ADDITION
tx;STfliG
GAAA[;l
3/d'•I -O'
b W1'1DWA5H eAR!ltER REQUIRfD "-1 OVERr1 .l!.:GS. 5001 AS
C.lf;T1l!'/l!RfD noors ANO B"-"l' Wit.OOW5 .
7 WINDOW ANO DOOR fAA.VfS MUST eE SfAl!O
~-.'Li OOU.IORJO,NTS itV-T MAY e~ 50Ut:ct:5 Of AIR INiRUSION
IJ.'USret:S!A!!D.
9. ~W J(ll5· 1i,1U5J l'.{SfAlfD TO f'll.~'t:NT il•Rl!,fJ:J,Gf .
10 TOi'S OflN1!RiORl'MTITIONWo\!J.SMU5T 6fSE>lfDTOl'Rfl/rnT
AIR!.DAA.G'E.
I I ELfCTRJCAL 60XE5 A.110 FANS MUST ef SfAlfD fO PR!YUJT .'lit
Lf>AAGf.
12. ~W l'.'.AU ASSW61.1f5. RIM JOISTS . ~D FOUN D.ATIONS MUST
6f SfAlfO TO f'R.MNT AIR LfAMGf
,n~MS 1.e W?:Rf AlW.'YS REOURfO ~OfRO,TU,Czy 2)
NOTE·
iN'ADblTIO~Rm .;:, T01lUILDfR55.''1CifQTIO'l5f0RCAi[GQ«Y l
i10U5f5