Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject Packetit r CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION ----------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address HALIHIR PARK ORONO PIN_ 71 i:F ;';�"M Property Identification Number (P.I.D. ) 08-117-31-0006 (Uf_)u7+ 0008,.41F>E19i # (K)IO + 00011 +00L' + 001.1 + iiu14 + 0016 +uO17 + 0018 Z# A050.04 Please check one - Property abstract or + torrens? :rt7.44 Attach legal description to application. = i�•� ------------------------------------------------------------ __ "10A YX APPLICANT Phone (home) '� i'-)-47'�t7 = Yvi ?j4:?9 v v ,-; n c: 7/W Name `IARCO R. FRANKLIN Phone (work) SAME Address: 11'-17 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- OltCHARU H. City: I'I'6:1. Zip: 55343 OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) Name ~'"'"' Phone (work) Address: _ City: Zip: (attach list if more than one) ---------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present Use (check) Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units other (specify) Present Zoning District i --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Lire Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New building Sites Number of Building Sites: _ Existing Units New Units s Total Units Proposed Gross Density: Units per 'O,Acres Minimum Lot Sizei IN �IIA. Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land ProFosed Use: (check) Residential Other (specify) MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Completed Application Form 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 4. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persc;cis you wish notified of this application. Certification bl Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature Date --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee sewer and water assessments). 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature Date --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) $150.00 Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement 250.00 Preliminary Review (Class 16 II Subdivision) 250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) 300.00 + 20.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) 150.00* *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pax all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature Date Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attei:d a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building i Zoning Office of this change prior to the meetin<l. To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members / Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & 7,oninq Administrator Date: August 16, 1990 Subject: 01583 Marco Franklin, Baldur Park Road - Subdivision/Sketch Plan Review List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Sketch Plan Designating Flood Plain and 75' Setback Impact. on Building Envelope Exhibit. D - Cook Letter 8/15/90 Exhibit E - Wetlands Map Exhibit F - Original 20 Unit Proposal Exhibit G - Hardcover Fact Sheet - Applicant Exhibit H - Site Plan Exhibit I - Preliminary Grading Plan Exhibit J - Plat of Existing Lots - Total 12 Exhibit K - 1982 Preliminary Plan of 3 Lots Total Gross Lot Areas = 120,395 s.f. or 2.76 acres Area Flood Plain (Area Below 931.51) = 60,113 s.f. or 1.39 acres Area thin 75' Setback Area = 76,217 s.f. or 1.75 acres Buildable Area at 75' SetL:ack Line = 22,000 s.f. or .5 acres Pertinent Ordinances - 1. Section 10.25 - LR-1C 7oninn District. Please review all lot standards. 2. Section 10.25, Subdivision 4 (A) - Conditional Use Permit for planned residential development. "This specific aoninq eistrict shall not be limited to detached single family st.ructures." The current proposal proposes three single family detached residences. It is not clear whether A PRD is proposed or a plat. Certainly it would be to applicant's benefit to develop under a PRD based on restrictions of flood plain and the 75' setback area of the peninsula. (Refer to factual findings noted at;ove. Zoning File 01583 August 16, 1990 Page 2 With PRD format of development applicant. may gain benefit of total gross area for density credit as long as all structure and improvements are located behind the 75' setback line. Total gross area = 120,395 s.f. or 2.76 acres Allowed density = 5 units The limitations on density will he the degree of hardcover excesses allowed with the 75-250' setback area at 22.,000 s.f. or .5 acres. Excessive hardcover exists with the existing access road and for any upgraded road because of its location within the 75' setback line on the north side of the peninsula. 3. Section 10.32 - PRD Ordinance 4. Sect -ion 11.10, Subdivision 6, 7, and 8 - Sketch Plan Review under the subdivision regulations. Review of Application A plan for three single family detached units has been proposed by applicant. Applicant may ask for density allowance based on 2.76 gross acres. In 1982, the City gtant.ed approval of a 3 lot plat (Exhibit K) that included Lot 31 (lot with existinq house) in overall calculations. The issue for this review is: Will the City approve hardcover excesses within the 75-250' zone to meet a level of dis ty that can be E ported by overall gross area? The applicant shows hardcover at approximately 48p Based on staffs buildable envelope at 22,000 s.f., it would be more at 60%. Please note this does not include the hardcover of the access road at over 7,000 s.f. in area. The road hardcover will be the same whether it serves one house, two houses or three houses as the entire road bed will be located within the 75' setback line. It would be to applicant's advantage to develop under a PRC) mode If applicant was to satisfy the standard of a plat under the direction of the LR-1C district, a plan would be limited to no more than two, maybe one. The setbacks would use up the already restricted building envelope. Plear:e review the engineer's report (Exhibit D). We are once again reminded tf.at we do not have a legal public road access to these parcels via the platted property to the east. Public access must be designated and dedicated on the forma) PRD subdivision proposal. The City wi l I agk the appl icant to request in writinq for an access and utility easement from the three involved property owners. If denied, the City must lao(eed with a separate condemnation action. Zoning File #1583 August 16, 1990 Page 3 Please Review Exhibit E. In the recent Sketch Plan reviews for this property, the City staff has failed to note that there are no designated wetlands on this property. The limitations on the site remain the 75' setback line and the 931.5' flood plain elevation. Review Exhibit I. The applicant proposes the filli,ig in of the f lood plain and matching excavations in other- sections of the f lood plain. This type of land alteration not only involves review by the MCWD, but the DNR and the Corps of Engineers and will require separate conditional use permit and variance application with the City of Orono. In reviewing Exhibit I you will also note that applicant has attempted to ad(:Tess the hardcover excesses by installing catch basins and dry wells designed to treat run-off before entering lake. Applicant note: that hardcover from all drives have been directed to the catch basins. Note the drainage arrows designated on drainage plan define drainage paths to catch basins. Staff Comments First, staff would like to compliment the applicant for responding to the concerns addressed in the original sketch plan review (Exhibit F). We have before us a far more realistic proposal, very similar to the one approved in 1982 by the City for three units. The following issues must be addressed to provide direction for the filing of formal plans of development: 1. Access/sewer easements. The City will ask the applicant to contact the three involved property owners. Depending upon the individual responses, the City will be obligated to commence condemnation if necessary. Responses of the neighbors must be received prior to the filing of the formal application so that the City may com:hence the condemnation at the time of filing the application. 2. Approved densities. what level is reasonable for the site? a. 1n 1982 the City approved three units. The exception was included in these considerations. The majority of Lot 31 is located within the 75' setback ar-a. The inclusion of 31 does not help the density. Remember gross density is at 2.76. Tiie area of Lot 31 does not increast, the buildable area of the restricted buildinq envelope. h, would you approve three units :f hardcover was reduced? How does the Planning Commission accept applicant's counter proposal with the catch basin/dry well treatment of run-off? Will it affect your decision? Zoning File #1583 August 16, 1990 Page 4 This type of improvement was accepted by the Council in 1982. Has our policy changed - the ordinances have not changed? 3. Applicant to be advised that a PRD is the only acceptable or practical method to develop the remaining undeveloped portions of the peninsula. Remember the existing PRD code exclusive of the Highway 12 corridor is very broad and subject to approval of the Council. Applicant should be advised to work with staff to develop most efficient plan for PRD design based on final resolve of density. lsv ORONO — 38 IS 1142 SEC. 8 r Tfl7v R. 23 Y'"T 0 lot 111 % % If dk A Irk- , 'rH ARM AfINNE-rONKA % ......... I Jll OW - wo K '16 16 NgA TO MINN OA - �—i r F FT� 0 (cftysTAI., A 33 still Fl(foll O axAr, uo" SEC.l7,T.117,R.23 8S Z:) b 4 SEC. 8,r.#7, R-PJ 301 ti 42 0 SEC :7, T 1f7.R 23 0 MKA OAY ArC (COYSTAL 0 G -- — .— —_ — I 9 � �l \`c�i�"-------mac ................................. ....... OUTLOTq _--- �: s —ME toll Ica- l'.�w 'i .7MS �� =T "• ZA i ��i / / y..d.•-� _ ��..-�-� i" - OppiiY prov l5 931.5 flood I" en(sdn j i } OUTLOT B(common area) `- `` _ _ - . �. '= to 000l ot 'D-OGRAPHIC SiRvE•-REPARED J B` GORDON R, COFFIN CO.. INC. / ENGINEERS L L*Q SURVEYORS. / .LONG LAKE. "N S SENCKORK IS A CHISELLED 'W' ON CONCRETE BASE AT •A+ CORNER OF R)P.f)tbE AT FRAY'S BAY DAM, p 1 ELEIATION 9J2.87 FEET, N.G.V.D.- .�\ �� - ',�...''w.�..''.•��('•��T, I r .y 1929 q��7V �' WJ'� L.UGa��t� Y►./ •r.�A/--Otr HIGHEST `IATER ELEVATION i\ 930.51 FEEETET,, ACCORDIN G �+ TO THE RECORDS OF mfN ESOTA / DEPARTHENT OP CONSERVATION. MAZER ELEVATTGN ON ,A)•E 19. 1979 WAS 929.74 FEET N...V.0 -1929. .� •_'low OUTLOT q - 1 a d � 1?��• +^ •� - i -- - ewe _ v� r �i • \ +eflrpo^ia• rove to remain 931.5 fii'ood Imi \ . toe ,s�sfl �' 1 OUTLOT B(common area) tot ti i -- \ ON� f}rs & OF- ws ENvw/of.e t 1�1 L-0cdL*,r0 `It,N r-/oub P1..'n Otto G 9oneuRK) PE Kenn A Gorr PF iai r, R Maland PE Trromas R ArWerson. A i A Bones t roo JAMarva. �et W Rpsene PE RKhata W Fost. PE Ke—WTn P Ar4rfuxl PE Gary F Rylarsder PF )oxp1+ C Arr)NM PE DunNa C &090 stt PE Mark R 11ois PE Mot a A`n5M PF Rosene L Sorvaia ✓E RKharst E T1xw PF )Fry A 9prtson PE Mara A Hanson PE R4be-n C Russet A I A Ihornat E Ang., Pt L PhW Grail IN PE Ilene C P~AtA "--m )arnr% C orscx Pt TM Feld. PE Hr jftT A SankMl Pt A" M tq AIL P Anderlik & Glenn R Coo► ►F Whae, T Ra Arnann PF Upsw ) Fd,�eMt PE )" D nertarn PIC IN)rGnbr n F tovfthunK PF P PIMtRrA Pt Mara PE C-wrl Older PE Associates �t G 4hWrtht PE Davt O Lusada PE D&ac Phaq>) CnwPe vt ) m C'wks A Erscksan Susan M Et~ C PA Than..% W Prtnson PF nrvN Man"I PF Leo M ►NA*wy MahaeC L^r, PE Man D Afton PE How M ow Engineers & Architects August 15, 1990 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota ,323 Attn: Jeanne Mabust.h Re: Baldur Park Peninsula Our File No. 139-1583 Dear Jeanne: We have reviewed the proposed subdivision on Baldur Park Peninsula. The turn around area should be platted as public right-of-way. The venter landscaping is not desirable in a public street. There is some concern by property owners to the south relative to adequate p0 lic access to this property. This concern should be reviewed and resolved by the developer. Drainage and utility easements will be necessary for sanitary sever, wetland areas and storm drainage. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATE", INC. Glenn R. Cook GRCodh grc JRA 2335 Wiest Highway 16 • St Paul. Mlnr►e ote SS11 3 • 611 636 4600 r . y f �... "1f' � :.•` yam^ .- •, Aw s nV - .. _ ���- _ . = �C. :.. �i "ss .+w.i�.J�,. tiC� ._..i_R .ra _ � ...�•� ` 2` �. �r'F yyt '4Y�. idwt ♦ Mli a - Y • � ' T,jl1'Ri� _ {.gyp. � (I-.. � t _ • - .19Rf.i �TtT S NOW 2, �V� o �, 2J •:� t� :.,e. :i r. °rC-: Wow ;":•,ice::: 1M L Ci Y umr. �\ 4Y. • \ T +9^ . -i 4" e T \ VIM ,• J/J 3 HARDCOvE:;� CALCULATION WOR S)HEcE- --� SET 3ACx ZONE: (C ; R C:._ ONE) 0-75'� 1 25�7-500' SO0-LOCO' ExISTING HARDCOVER IN LONE -------------------------- A. HOUSE -A l x S.F. LENGTH WIDTH 11. x _ a Zja�~ S.F. � n -z < < 2 �- tP a�— MLCN� q)'4� �I z Z°ul _o r a > 1411 z u l of ":- G. OTHER x S F. TOTAL HAROCCVER IN ZGNE � 9 TCTAL PROPERTY AREA IN Z:NE - ` � S.F. B B. GARAGE C. DR I VEWAY L ` _ x Soo � S.F. S.F. (CIO S.F. E. gATIO/ , ECx- S.F. F.LANDSCAFE x S.F. AREAS ? UNLERLAIN. e•, x • S.F. ,2� J PLASTIC SHEETING x S.F. x 'low Di d"� row till, FWMIN -W 11 le w .0 o►aw.sy -OWE' . MWI :MTLA ELCV�a+pH _ ��� �\\\V Nw,IbACD ! /1�Y0 MI NO1C in O' -"L *#E*, r.,Tw" 'S- LSd I 'Z«C SK.— pf""/ hNdl► 7-.rK To erICN &- ..* f pfr.�it.,.,1 oC' —ev e +C ftf -EOt#~cp.ve&trfxeo r•w .As«r 6-0.- Oo e.�.etor,A--Aaor osoa. /M. Nw.tMA of.vµ .,nw-. KJW! TD .re1 fUDO wse fur..re► 4 •b+R - •1+«l1.1fQ � Kr �) � WIM'Nn.MCMNy�CH- dAf. ;p.a1F GM7�oM �'MtlR �...t0 CO- Q huA. GLrd•! P�lM. t# M+M tom/ NW M+.wJF laM710P1 �M�M o db A^f{�i LOT AT OUi ron bcc" ft., wgu,; i � I Y ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 20, 1990 ZONING FILE /1558-ZUCKMAN CONTINUED This is definitely an improvement." Johnson said, "I would be interested to see ghat the public has to say about this proposal. I believe that something like this would do very well in this location." Bellows said, "I would like to see the intensity of this development decrease. I do not object to the proposal for four units, but question whether reaucing the size of the units would be an appropriate trade --off." Rowlette stated that she would be more receptive to the proposal if the units were scaled down. Hanson said, "I agree that the units need to be scaled down. I am impressed with the fact that Mr. Buckman intends to reside on the property." Mabusth stated that it will be necessary to grant a hardcover variance in the 75-250' setback area for this development. She noted that there will be no hardcover in the 0- 75' setback area and ma]or reductions within the 250-500' area. Bellows said, "I believe we are willing to look at hardcover from an overall aspect, rather than concentrating on each setback area." Mr. Zuckman said, "Access to the property will add quite a bit of hardcover. 1 wart the access point to be as far from the curve as possible." (tabu _h stated that the County will have to review the access. As a last directive, the Planning Commission reminded ;1r. Luckman that he will need to work with the LMCD regarding boat silps. #1583 MARCO FRANKLIN BALDUR PARK ROAD SKETCH PLAN OF PRD/SUBDIVISION 1i,irco Franklin was present for this review. Mabustn Provided the Planning Commission with a summary of tale ma; or Jssues involved with this application !see Jeanne Maousth's memo dated August 16, 1990). Mabusth said. "Th.re is an existing house on Baldur Park. The individual residing in that house has informed the City that his property is excluded from this subdivision. Also, with respect to hardcover, the need for an access road dill require hardcover within the 0-75' setback area. no matter what the final approvea density allowed." ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 20, 1990 ZONING FILE #1583-FRANKLIN CONTINUED Bellows said. "Before we proceed much further with this, we need to address the road issue." Mabusth said. "The City would have to proceed with condemnation. We would first ask Mr. Franklin to contact the existing three property owners on Baldur Park Road. If they indicate that they will not give Mr. Franklin an easement. the City will have to condemn." Mr. Franklin said. "'There are currently power lines out on Baldur Park. I know that there is a problem with the septic system for Lot 30. The system is heaved out of the ground on one side. I have gone to great lengths to scale down my proposal. We have designed a catch basin and gone so far as to consider the direct runoff from roof tops. We intend to provide a cul-de-sac. At this time, it would be impossible for a fire truck or snow plow to turn around at the end of the point." Hanson asked for the radius of the cul-de-sac. Mabusth replied that it must be at least 40 feet paved and 50 feet for right -of -,ray. Hanson said. "I am impressed with this proposal. I would lake the flood plain issue addressed." Mabu3t" said. "This application would be reviewed by other agencies. It would be necessary to provide compensatory filling for any excavation work done below the 931.5 elevation. Mr. Franklin is proposing to fill below the 931.5 elevation, but there will be no structures located within the flood plain." Mr. Franklin's associate said, "The basements of these units wi:l be two feet abuve flood level." 71abusth stated that hardcover is the main issue. She said, "When the Planning Commission reviewed Mr. Franklin's previous proposal. you indicated that you would not grant any variances within the 75-250' setback area. This property is very unique with many hardships. There is a very small building envelope and variances will be necessary." Johnson asked Mir. Franklin if he had attempted to acquire Lot 30? Pir. Franklin replied. "I have spoken to him several tides. Each time i talk to him the price of his property increases." ,Johnson asked whether the would be a commons ,area owned by a homeowner's association. - 30 - ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 20, 1990 ZONING FILE #1583-FRANRLIN CONTINUED tor. Franklin replied, "I would prefer to have the area privately owned." With respect to the road, Mabusth asked, "Would the Planning Commission prefer to see this private drive as an outlot within an outlot?" Hanson stated that he would prefer to see a public road, rather than private. Mabusth stated that the City will only condemn up to the property boundary and that the cul-de-sac world be public. Bellows said, "There will be four units on this private road. Will it be necessary to have the road 24' wide?" flabusth replied. "That has not been determined yet. we can estimate that the road will be 22' to 24' wide with an 60' diameter cul-de-sac. ile will need an opinion from the City Engineer." Bellows said, "I am impressed also with this proposal. It has come a long way. However I am st?.11 concerned about Baldur Park Road, which is sub -standard and unsafe. 1 have a hard time supporting any intensification unless the City takes responsibility for the road. I feel that the road issue presents an unfair circumstance for Mr. Franklin." Mabusth said, "I believe that if a formal proposal for development j.s presented to the City, it will have to take a serious look at the road_" .;ohnson asked about meeting setbacks and establishing 'it lines. Mabusth replied, "Building paas will be created and they will be called lots. There will be built-in setbacks and defined lots for each house. Everything around the pad will be an open space outlot. Your consensus is that you «ant the road that leads from the cul-de-sac to also be oefined as an outlot." Bellows said. "The sites would be sold as pre -constructed Lin-ts." r.abusth said "That is correct. The individual will buy what is defined as a lot, a footprint. and a share of the open space commons area." Bellows said, "tlhether the individual purchases the footprint prior to or after constructionit is a un..t he burs. it is not his option to design a building for that lot." - 31 - ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 20, 1990 ZONING FILE #1583-FRANRLIN CONTINUED Mabusth said, "That is correct, it will have to all be designed within that pad." Johnson asked Mr. Franklin whether he was aware of that condition. Mr. Franklin replied, "Two of these wil_. have to be pre -sold before I begin construction." Johnson asked whether there will be a joint dock or individual docks. Mr. Franklin replied, "I would prefer to have private, individual docks." Bellows asked Mr. Franklin if he had received adequate direction. Mr. Franklin stated that yes, he had sufficient direction. He noted that there will be mininal disturbance of the existing trees and that they will maintain t:ie wilderness, cat -tail area around the peninsula. He said, "That should alleviate the possibility of anyone using chemicals to control that area." Mabusth informed Mr. Franklin that the center island in the cul-de-sac will have to be removed. COMMENTS FROM PLANNING COMMISSION REP RE: COUNCIL. MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1990 Bellows said. "The Council agreed with all of our recommendations. In July there were several issues where our recommendation was over -turned. I do not feel that Council has to agree with us all the time. At the August meeting, it teas always made known to the public what tha Planning Commission vote had been. I thought that was great." Mabusth asked the Planning Commission to provide a list of the specific applications that were over -turned by Council. Bellows said, "Mr. Stubbs' application. the Peterson application, and the McCourtney application." APPROVAL OF MINUTES-JULY 16, 1990 PLANNING CONMISSIO&J MEETING A motion was made by Bellows. seconded by Johnson, to approve the minutes of the July 16, 1990 Planning Commission meeting. notion, Ayes-5. Nays-0. Motion carried. PLANNING COF01ISSION REPRESENTATIVE it was a,reed that Sara noos would attend the September 1990 Council meeting as a Planning Commission Representative. - 32 - CITY OF ORONO ZONING FILE #1583 P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 473-7357 Date of Notice: 08/29/90 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TO: Marco Franklin COPIES TO: 13237 Orchard Drive Minnetonka, MN 55343 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: Subdivision/PRD-Sketch Plan Review ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: August 20, 1990 VOTE: No Formal Action was required of Planning Commission NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: The Planning Commission did provide the following conceptual direction to applicant in preparation for filing formal subdivision/PRD application: 1. Easements for access/sewer. The City must ask that the applicant contact the three involved property owners to the east of the subject property to determine if it is feasible to acquire easements through said properties. If applicant fails to achieve agreement with neighbors, City will be responsible for condemning easements for access and utilities. 2. Density. The Planning Commission unanimously agreed that the proposed three unit density was more realistic and suggested that applicant apply for a three unit PRD. 3. Hardcover. The issue of the access road hardcover was accepted by the Planning Commission as presented. Applicant was encouraged to reduce hardcover within building pads. 4. PRD. Applicant should consult with staff prior to developing preliminary plans and discuss layout of PRD subdivision. It is strongly recommended that applicant apply for a PRD form of development because of the severely restricted building envelope and the ability to cluster homes rather than meet required setbacks of a formal plat. S. As filling will he proposed within the flood plain of Lake Minnetonka for proposed access drive and portions of yard areas along south shore of property, the following agencies must complete a permit review: a. Corps of. Engineers U. Department of Natural Resources C. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District d. City of Orono will require a separate conditional use permit and variance application with PRD subdivision. Please contact Jeanne Mahusth if applicant seeks additional information or has any questions pertaining to the directives noted above.