Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketLAND USE. PLANNING ZONING VARIANCE: APPLICATION CITY OF ORONO P.O. Kox 66, Crystal R ty, Mlnnc•x,,t.t t i 1: 1 IN_STRUCTIO;1_S Please first read the attached lnfornmtion Sheet. Complete Itens 1 - 1? (Tyne or Print). If needed, attach letter or ether inforrwtion to better tier.•ribe your request. Incomplete applications will not be a:cepted. 1 . PROPERTY ADDRESS _ /3 9(o Legal description shall he shown on attached Survey, Exhibit ? ?. APPLLCANT Name Ur._1teven Nct.niLk Phon, Killing Address is j l i.l sr 1, 1f Applicant is not utter, explain bu' _[--- unfiL r n ,rc la v a.freereni ---- --- 3. OWNER tc, Rona 1 d Geh r i ly Phonr--� Mailing Address _•�— ;aLI,:; Ln_ Moufld-Minn 553.:4 Date Property Acquired (w+nthfYear) I (do) (do not) also own other adjacent ]];heels of kind 4. AGENT ]lame Sc cit t ! Mom, Mone 4 ] 1 -345 i -- C Firm antt,r�j 21s injwRrd Pr`per! iec �C Mailing Address Rna IS- 1C.va rr Milto J 5. NOTICES Shruld be sent to: --- Appll ant OYner Agent h. PRESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT 7. PRE:SEN'T USE Residential __&_ (other] ITS � Description Initial Applicati.n angst Include. l tz/ Application Fors 2 L Property ?loners Liar 7 ' Certificate of Surve• lee Receipt ,9-4a9 OarA Received/ \i Staff I formation _ S 4 Pl+c Map Inventory 6 _ Staff Comments d .her Infc•rnation s N _ Vacant land _-_ Vacant butldinR(s) _- occupied butlding(f 1-- " V tie is. DESCRIBE. REQUEST ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ establish new use _ continue or expand existing use _ build new _ add on tellrbl �11•fd Describe request in detail: 1 -11 , tine t r a r r ]rut of - 11, 1. uli ,oIQ it. uyrlle� Uidtltl ..n..---If -.itl�,-ariAn.� � 9. VA k I A NCF (S) R FQ1' T R K D to t, th. requeeted Nora -- lot Area l' lot Width Nsrdaovar Setna •k ( ►rant Side Rear) Other Firm CFntcir•F 4if) dwarcj Prnnert ies InL. e — V Melling Address Reim ty 14 varrr- Minn 5. NOTICES Shculd be sent to: 10 Applicant Owner _i Agent I1 6. PRESENT XONING USE DISTRICT' 1' . PRESENT USE Residential {_ (Other) Vacant inner - ts . DESCRIBE REQUEST' _ establish new use VHtYAnt Nutldtn,-(s) Occupied Building( vlTrt 1Ati.. 5�v ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ 14Acin .rin 4 continue nr expand existing use _ build new _ add on reteodel replace Describe request in detail: _ i � � . _ . nn%r r,ic r ;c�rr of , :10 ta:n.l '-'rt ,.id ,u(. owner dionrt iunew areviL,, u.Arian.s. 9. VARIANCE(S) REQUTRED to i,, the requested Wnrk _ lot Area 1.,t Width Msrdeover Setback ( Front Side Rear) Other lO. Describe ITNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS pteventtnR compliance with ZnntnA Cone requirements: on t1 i 1 i le `( r, 11. Describe UNDUE HARDS111P or PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY resulting from strtet aeforeesiert of toning regulations—itiic,: i, r. ,quare foot Si -',)e• not '?Pr urrstnr r;, rC, end it k not pee.- 11. Describe 1 FF'E T OF PROPOSED WORK on nelphhnrtntt vi,vertle. and cn the nei`hbonc,od to general. ;y.^ . A ,e in aru ; c: ., Ct 111i f ore en( i; The APPLICANT and the PROPERTY OWNER trust sign and date titL£ application. The APPLICANT hetrhy •Riven to provide all infr,naui in The (1fM hercly acknowledges and agrees rn this appltcatto.t required , r requested hV the &ninpt Adsdnistratnr, sprees and further authorlres resrssafle, entry onto the proportr t:, par all fees a,.d/or umrsual espru.<s fncurred in review r.r Ctt• staff, consultants, earn*$, c.nnsission sresereril. ­f this appltcarl•n, and certlflee that thr int,.naati,�n and G,urvtl members for psrpnaes of 1nvvsttRatfnn and wrvlled If true ..nd enrrect t„ the heat of his kn,wlP.1,r Verlflcaeinn of this regent Appl ic• )rt `s Sign.a Lm, MIte 06mer's Si nature Date APPLICA110N DMDI.' ,1K TF.N (10) DAYS BEFOKE PIANNINC CO' MISSION FETING "c iz j PROPERTY OWNERS LIST DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE _ I CERTIFY THAT IAE FACTS REPRESENTED ON THIS A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER CERTIFICATE ARE AN ACCURATE ANL TRUE REPRE- SENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS MINNEAPOLIS, MN 534137 DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION, TO THE MIST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF ' I HENNEPIH CO FINAN/CE IVISION ' LIST SIZE L� - DATE • Y ' TAX PAYER / FEE OWNER PROPTTY A pR 0 MAILING ADDRESS 1 ............... —�� L-A 32 .s- 5.. �� 2 K, 7 �t �J e x 4//, 1 r 0 hN z '4/,g), LL 57orw U dlli MOVIA, S, will w: ■ CITY OF ORONO EXHIBIT 5 LAND USE PLANNING ZONING VARIANCE. INVENTORY r tag• �J_ ,._._..,. VARIANCES REQUIRED Zoning Use District DENSITY "m-wqm- Mt;JvWkm 4kc—MA ----- — v_��/t�rwcs _ cwc .SECmm— tall Are• ;LIS�0 '°� 1'�->A ��� `+ -2� 5�- � / x 3 fJ/. SSJL Liot SETBACKS MIl�1M1M 1tEQuIRL� ►Jt157.ING_ -__ r1101USR v AIx"Cz-- [&rest kfrontl Reer - — - - — -- — ----- ---- - -- —�F [Lod. to •ldq. - ------..-- _ ---- - i Lakeshore 7s n. Wetlands 76 rt. CODE SFC- ION PERe1TTtM MISTIMC r110rOS® TOTnL HARDCOVER LOT AP -EA HwtinU1 cOVw JtDC0% rn NAADCOVU trw11 L,na -rax. •.[- set. s,f. :.j��_ !•1t. X COD[ £iC ll.�ll lake 0 - 7S rt. 0% 14.202 Lab a 7S - 710 rt. 25% C _ ---- _34_102 Lake 7SO - SOO rt. 30% 34.102 Lake 500 - 1000 rt. 15X 34.202 OTHER SECTIONS u O1R� - CXISTIl1G - — roto►pst:p vwlt Caf[ _ i_ : sQ1o. Mart.» letght (s..r. ) Ntking (1&1n.I Lake SOO - 1000 Pt. 35% ----- . 34.202 OTHER SECTIONS _ olRm Building sleight (siaa. ) Parking (Min.) _ EXISTING_ PROPOSED_ -_ _ VARIANCE c E SECTIaM LAND DIVISIOY: plat ,_ RLS unplatted • late/parcels pet application AVAILASIL1TYi adjacent lots/patcels (r 1 vacant Y occupied _ _ sans ownership_- separate ownership January 1. 1975 0.-nrrshtp Zsingle separate _ combined with other parcels not in this application TO►OGMP'ta Includes JZ lalteshore ____ wetlands _ high ground _— level ground rolling hills �.L/ •loop slopes open areas wooded area• atOGRAMY affecting appliestione _ unusual lot sheps _ unusual building location lot also/shaper ✓%nslstent _ inconsistent iith r.sighborhood development ACCififlr _ now existing -city county/etat• _ __ private WrILITItf:r City some, _Z1avallable connected: City water available connected septic cysts ____ new proposed _ — existing conforming ___ existing subeta„dard existing non -conforming UND USE subject lee. Is _-vacant _ occupied / QISTING LAJW USE , red to zoning use district: {/ conforming use _ con:ittonal use _ non -conforming use PROPOGAL affects principal accessory building or use STRUCTURES t=1STIM SU1LDIMGS ___ do do rx.t v.sply with zoning pertormance veranda ea 0•/ielenciasr PPAWMAL TYPE, entirely WM building or use review as WEN building of use (coat exceeds SOi fMV) review as EX ►AMSICIN of existing (cost less than sm PMV) twisting building ►AIR MAMTT VALUE (yr) 1_ NOPOSAL — will will not reduce an existing substendard yard dimension TAXES 6, ASSESSMENTS 0M100,112 l W . 1ots/Porcele armed In at. watt _ are _ are nOt legally oo.bir►ed for tax purposes. TMltfw — are PAID tatirent are DfLIlWUratT to year Asaes.ssnts laelede tower (its) �_, unite rate (no l wits CITY OF ORONO EXHIBIT 6 Page 1 LAND USE PLANNING STAFF COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS PREPARED FOR: PI ar.n Inq Cummieelor, Mretinq (Date) Cuunc i I Meet ing (Date) -- -- - -- - — -- -. - — - - - -- BY: (Staff)(Staff) APPLICATION REVIEWED BY: ,- City Administrator City Attorney City F},gineer Village Planner v Zoning Administrator _ Planning Commission Park Ccvmeission SPECIAL COMMENTS _ Public works Coordinator Public Safety Director —_ ►inance Director Building inspector ---- Septic Inspector (,fates ) (dates) i ...h6f �. ��wall Hennepin Cty. DOT Minn. State DOT Minn. DNR MCWD --- LMCD STAFF RECOMMENDATION A►PRO VI. •ppI Icat Ion a •ube,ttted APPROVE appl t, at lot, •ub)ect to follcP-If,q cc, ndlt Aun• Ttltli. •ppllcat/on fur oddlt tonal infor,net ion [,INV application for reuon• noted at—wo CITY OF ORONO EXHIBIT 6 Page 2 LAND USE PLANNING STAFF COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED FINDINGS 1. The special conditions applytrg to the structure or land in questiun are Fwculiar to suctr proµ•rty or ienredistely surrounding property and do not alrply y—e-rally to other land of structures in the district in which sold land is located; oh The conditions spply.nq to the atjucture or land in cue-Ation are not p•rulrar to such property or Immediately surrounding property but du apply gener+lly to .rther land or structures In the drrrtrrct tr which said land is located. / 2. _� The granting of the application tois _ is not necessary for the pre%ervot3an and enlryment of a substantial property right of the applicant. ). V1 The granting of the proposed variance will not 1n any way impair the p•.ablic health, safety, comfort, morals or general welfare; Olt The granting of the proposed variance may impair the public health, safety, comfort. morals or general welfare. 4. The granting of the proposed variance will not be contrary to the intent of the Comprehensive land Use Plan or the Zoning Code; Olt The granting of the proposed variance would be contrary to tire intent of the Comprehensive Lsnd Use Plan or the Z, ning cede. S. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a r-crrrvenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate dr.ronst•ated hardships or difficulties; op TM applicant has demonstrated no rerognired hardship or difficulty and therefore the granting, of such variance would merely serve as a convenience to auc' applicant. 6. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL r 1 i ID 1 400 1 400 00 1 �• Soo , 1 i•o V 1131T ..t ��; j, •,t.• o• ..v,y �7. •� r �r•.r c• ,r-ro-.o,•1 ;.n'.'rr. err ...ri-t r ' .P' .. , 1 .c � a:c jr .. t vv .how o)Q. r.: r r•r crc .c' rh h r77j .421,;;0900, -00, 10 rctti t. :,. +'n .L: nj `.. 41 it i C, NOV - 91981 1 p�Q + CITY OF ORON v .o q, #66 RON GEHRING NE w"Pust 6f m of t7S 3?15 CHMttI S IN WOUND. MN. 55364 a 'No 41 'Ire -*�ft rn now JM% W `r i sad.. ....... .• --ram.... 'Do J� r+ �� ± �+►'� �� �� �' ♦ � �.-+ . �� `..•.r...+.I ..•.may r � 1 y _OF yam. _.. �"".�' +� �?++ �►'�-•�. .l I . • � = `f+ ti ISM •w foil is f r r. i rr :if. •i vts Im zz eXor .-e AUX 001L PON, eXor .-e AUX 001L PON, /Y6 ov VILLA ;E OF ORONO Regular fleeting; of the planning* Commission, 7:30 P.'1. 'larch 20, 1972 T;ie Planning Commission met on the above date with tae follo►,ing members present: Chair- man Soutaworth pro tem, Elliott, Kiillberp, ,r Nicholls, Ryerse, and '.'jn ,Jest. lierfurtij late. Also ,)resent: Councilman lassengale anu Administra.cr iartin. Absent: Gzsch, lays, Poisson, and Searles. Jrs. Gary iiostetler represented herself in VARIANCE an zpnlic;ation for a variance on lot size Lot Size F, Frontage and frontage from t%e required o,i^ acre 1350 Rest Point Circle and 140' lit widt:i. Brotigat out was tv-st their lot is 53' on t:!e street, 09' on toe lake, and 225' deep or roughly 14,600 sq. ft. e oot-se on this lot burned out about two w the ago and the ins-irance company d; lared it a total loss, so they Irish to co:struct a new home. Tney have a temporary permit for 90 days to use a mobile ;come. The existing rouse was hooked to sewer. Elliott moved, Ryerse se_on 1e-i, clue to hardshin and that the house was in single separate ownership since 196 , annroval be recommended. 'lotion, Aye? (6) - Nays ('0). . embers reviewed tae ap lication of Joaui VARIANCE Larson, 1396 Baldur Par Road, legally Lot Size F, Frontage des..•ibPd as Lot 16, Block 1, Baldur Par,.. 1396 Baldur Park Road Toe lot 'ias been in single separate owner- s;iip for many years. T.iere was a summer ,souse on the prenises that he removed last jecember at the insistence of tae Building Inspector. The density study showed teat with the exception of three parcels, w:iicn consisted of two lots and one large parcel at tine end of the point, the residences in Baldur Park consisted of oie lot corre- sponding to the subject lot in size and width. Discussion was not ;field on what length of time a variance was good for and w;iether a ( nditional use permit could be issued in lieu of a variance. It was brought out that a residence was a permitted use and as such, could not be conditioned. it was noted that the next item on the agenda was a variance on lot size and widt;i granted in 19bS. Some people bought the property an' were old to apply for a variance so they could be issued a building permit. (Cont►nned) Page L MINUTES OF A REGULAR 11EETING ',ILL!) ,:ARCH 20, 1972 Ryerse moved, Southworth seconded, that since the lot has been in single separate ownership prior to 1969 and is serviced by sewer, that approval be recommended. ,lotion, Ayes (6) - Mays (0). i1r. Berto gnoli represented himself in a lot size avid frontage variance of Lots 2-3, Block 15, Saga hill, 1415 Park Drive. Members studied the map for density in the area. T;iere were three Houses consisting of one lot eac:i in Block 15, one mouse with two lots, Lots l F, 3 -ire the subject lots and Lots 6 F, 7 are also vacant. It was discbvered that approval was given by the Village Council in 196S to build on Lots 6 $ 7 if ifecombieed�mbToedate1 also Lots 2 F, 3, this combination has not been made. The area is serviced by sewer and would Piave 130' frontage and 31,000 sq. ft. of the necessary 140' and 43,S60 sq. ft. Kullberg moved, Ryerse seconded, that they recommend t 1965ooriginal Votige oo Ayes (7; - Nays (0). ;Iemuers unanimously agreed to table the Ililliam Near matter of service station construction on Wayzata ioulevard unti4 suc;t time a conditional use permit is applied for. Iierfurth reported tilat ae had attended tae National Home Builders Convention in San Francisco and had a great opportunity to converse with luiowledgeable people oa PU;) ordinances and also to view some site, in Kansas City and Salt Lake Cite. Since there were so many variables in PUD ordinances, he was of t;ie opinion that the committee rough up a PUD ordinance and let the Planning, Commission give opinions as to the desirability. Ile Posed a number of questions: 1. Does the Village wish in density for amenities would give? to allow any increase such an ordinance 2. Mould PUu projects nave to be zoned in areas or obtained by special use permits in any sewered area of tae Village? 3. To what extent would the PUD ordinance ti►e levelup4-r to intf%rminp' a commercial, industrial and iesiueutial usage? by allow VARIANCE 1396 Jaldur Park Road (C nXinued)� VARIANCE Lot Size and Frontage 1415 Part: Drive BUILDING PER, -►IT ;Vi l l iam Wear 2120 Wayzata Boulevard POD ORDINANCE /ail'AR MELTING OF THE Jeanne Mabusth, Zoninq the record the request Baldur Park Road, for a 1980, which states: A Uil rN. C(A"X I I., JANLIAItY 30, 1980 Page 6 Administrator, t-nt•_red into ✓VARIANCE of koboL t Veilleux, 1396 1396 Baldur Park Road variance., dated .1anuary 22, 0536 Robert Veilleux Mr. Veilleux has applied for i lot width and lot area variance for Lot 16, Block 1 f Baldur Park. The previous owner, John 1-irsun, received approval for a similar application in March, 1972. The site plan, as approved by the Planning Commission, will require no setback variances. Planning Commission Minutes - January 14, 1980 Hannah moved, to recommend approval of the variance request in accordance with site plan submitted with the condition that the house be moved to accommodate proposed decK, noting all future: construction must not encroach lakeshore setback area and consideration be gi,,en ir. location of driveway and garage in limiting unnecessary hard- cover. Hannah stated the foll ',!:.irg hardships and findings: 1) no additional la-1 2) neighbors do not object; 3) s.r•.':,: application previously granted, and 4) sur-. ing neighboring lots are all of the same size. Council Meeting - January 30, 1980 Butler moved, ilurr seconded, to approve the variance request of Robert Veilleux, 1396 Baldur Park Road, per the Planning Commission recom- mendations of January 14, 1980. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). Mayor Van Hest moved, Butler seconded, to table the proposed zoning amendments for fences and accessory structures until a later date. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). PROPOSED ORDINANCES Fences Accessory Structur,:s Butler moved, llurr seconded, to adopt Ordinance Oi?DIN:ANCE Nn. _12" No. 227, An Ordinance Amendinq C'h.eptcrs 22, 23 Licensinq And 69B Of The Municipal Code Of Orono Pelating To The Licensing Of Plumbers, Well Drillers Septic System Installers Anti Itn,isemovears. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). Butler moved, Hurr seconded, to ,ipproves the HOUSING REIIABILITATION Housing Rehabilitation (Hennepin Coun'_y REPORT - 19-'9 Administered) Report for 1979 - Project 75. Motion, Ayr's (3) - Nays (0). MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 16, 1981 Page 6 Mabusth asked the applicant for the proposed hours of operation? Applicant stated that they would be open from 6:00 AM to 6:30 or 7:00 PM 7 days a week. The applicant was asked about other sales that he would have in the shop. Applicant stated that he would have the same inventory plus gas and also cigarettes and soft drinks. Applicant stated that they had a 4 year lease and that they could consequently operate a bait shop at two locations. Hammerel moved to table Paul Fahlin's application until the neighbors are notified. Goetten seconded. Vote: Ayes (7), Nays (0). (FAHLIN CONT.) Posnik and Mann were present. Mabusth noted that an ►/ SCOTT MANN additional 5' of right of way would be needed. Hurr 1396 Baldur Park noted that there was a boat and dock without a principal Variance structure. She explained to them that this was in #664 violation of the code. Rovegno noted the hardcover problem and that there would be an additional 1,000 sf if garage was not detached. He suggested detaching the garage and putting it closer to the road and moving it back to meet the setback line. He cautioned that the applicant had only 750 sf of additional hardcover for a driveway. Mabusth stated that the inly response from the neighbors was that they wanted to ..now if there would be a two story house. Applicant explained that it would be a two story basement walkout. Mabusth explained that staff would take he avetaac lakeshore setback for the principal st:.c'-ures. Rovegno moved tj app-ove the lot area and lot width variance for a lot of record which has not been helcl in commonownership since January 1, 1975, and on the following conditions: 1 - Hardcover not to exceed 2385 sf 2 - No other variances will be issued 3 - 5' additional right of way, coit claim Beet? to City 5 - No dock until certificate of occupancy is issue,3 6 - Principal structure must meet average lak`shore setback of abutting lots. Goetten seconded. Vote: Ayes (7), Nays (0). ATV of ORONO !oel 1lfrue Ho■ (jfi*('r,rtal now. Mlnnerwts .`W6341"Mun ;.41 lfttree Teleo. :ie 473 7:W Dr. I:teven Posnick 43.16 Aldrich Avenue Minneapo?- , MN cc: Ronala Gehring & Scott Mann NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Meeting ll-_16-81 Votes: , 7 -- For __ _ ___ Against Planning Commission recommends the following: Control No. __-664 -- X Variance Conditional Use Permit Subdivision, Preliminary Date of Noticell--1_r_81 - _ Approval: As submitted Approval: Subject to conditions noted _ Approval: Additional information required before Council meeting Denial: For reasons noted Tabled: Pending receipt of additional information from applicant Tabled: Pending review by others, or further Planning Commission study No action required NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1) improvements on site (to include patios, driveways,_ etc.) -mom not exceed 2,385 sf of hardcover; 2) no setback V variances will te_granted to -the -required buildinq envelope; 3) all _structures_ must meet average lakeshore setback of houses on abutting lots - staff to de_sigrate-setback line; 4) prior to issuance of a building permit applicant must furnish City a quit claim deed of_5' of additional right of -- way for Baldur Park Road; 5) Applicant should be advised that a dock is an accessory structure and that a principal structilre must -be existing on —the site prior to the issuance of a building permit for new dock use. l X Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Plarin ing Coma' ,s ion Counc i 1— r Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deailline for the me e t i n g is ` - _ _ _ _ -. % or for the � _ -- --____ -- meeting. In all cases, the application must be continued witli the submittal of requested information withinor the City will consider the application as formally with,"raven. If the applicant has troul0p obtaining additional information, plcAse Contact the Zoning Administrator. If you desire certified copies of the official Planniny cor mi is ion Minutes they are available from the Building and Ln�ling Se--ret ax y upon revie- and appr!ival by the Plancin-t _�r,igsir r,• TO: Waiter R. Benson FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth DATE: November 30, 1981. SUBJECT: #664 Steven Posnick, 1396 Baldur Park Road - Variance Zoning District - LR-lC Area - 12,870 sf Application - Renewal lot area and lot width variance application (Original variances approved January 30, 1980 and March 20, 1972) Frea Variance: Required - 21,780 sf Existing - 12,870 sf Variance - 8,91.0 sf or 41% Lot Width Variance: Required - 100' Existing - 50' Variance - 50' or 50% List of Exhibits Exhibit 1 - Application Exhibit 2 - Property Owners List Exhibit 3 - Lot Survey Exhibit 4 - Plat Map Exhibit 5 - Fact Sheet Exhibit 6 - Site Plan Exhibit 7 - Building Elevations Exhibit 8 - Council minutes 3-20-72 Exhibit 9 - Council minutes 1-30-80 Exhibit 10 - Planninq Commis. -ion minutes 11-16-81 Dr. Posnick seeks a lot area and lot width variance to permit construction of a new home. At one time a summer residence bad existed on the site and was removed in December of 1971 because of its unsafe conditions. The lot has 'peen in 5inale separate ownership for many years - prior to 1Q67. The proposal would create a residential site consistent with the pattern of development of surrounding neic•hborhood. None of the property owners notified attended the action meeting at the Planning Commission. Ted Boer called my office to state that a two story structure would impede his view of the lakeshore to the south of his home (across Baldur Park Road to the rear of his house - not the lakeshore view to the front). I advised fir. Boer that is long as the structure does not exceed the 30' height standard, a two story structure would be allowed. fie stated that he urrierstood. 1664 Steven Posnick Variance Page 2 The neighbor to the east of the subject lot was t )ncerned wits. the additional drainage that would result fror, the new construction. Staff advised that drainage concerns would be addressed during the building plan review but that special considerations would be given to the severe slopes along the east line of the property that drop within a few feet of his home. The applicant has been advised that the proposed deck and principal structure must meet the average lakeshore setback of the existing houses on the abuttina lots. Staff would stake the setback line for both structures. In ad.ition, Posnick was advised that 5' of additional right of way for Raldur Park Road would be sought by the City because the travelled road extends into the southern portion of the lot. (Exhibit 3) At the Planning Commission meeting of November 16, 1981, the Planning Commission made the followi.nq recommendation: To recommend approval of the lot area and lot width variance of Dr. Steven Posnick based on the followina findings: 1 - Lot 16, Block 1, Raldur Park has been in single separate ownership prior to 1967. 2 - The proposed building site is consistent with the pattern of development of the surrounding neiahborhood. 3 - There is no additional land available to combine with subject property. 4 - There have been no objections from the neighbors as far as the buildability of the lot. 5 - Lot area and lot width variance applications have been approved for the property back in 1-30-80 and 3-20-72. such approval is subject to the following conditions: 1 - Improvements on the site (to include Frtios, dri-ewa}s, etc.) may not exceed 2,14 sf of hardcover. 2 - No setback variances will be granted to the required building envelope. 3 - All structures must meet average lakeshore setback of houses on abutting lots - staff to designate setback line. 4 - Special consideration be given in location of driveway and garage in limiting unnecessary hardcover. 5 - Prior to issuance of a building permit, applicant must furnish the city a quit claim deed, deeding 5' of additional right of way for Baldur Park Road. #664 Steven Posnick Variance Page 3 6 - At 'hp tine of the bu Iaing Elan review special care shoul be given to the u.rainage along the east hang. - of the site. 7 - Appli:;ant should be advised that a duck is an accessory structure and that a principal structure must exist on Cie site prior to the issuance of a building permit for new dock line. „EGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, DI"CEMBER 14, 1981 Pale 3 Hurr moved, liutler seconded, to approve tht, prcliali- SUBDIVISION nary subdivision request of Michael Pluhm, 2710 Walt-r's 2710 Walter's Port La. Port Lane, pe - the Planning Commission rcco:mner..lations 4657 of November 16, 1981, subject to the moa:nik property Michael Fluhm being connected to the City water stub being brought to tho property line; location of the wetlands and utilities easement:.; being addressed and detorminod by staff as to the minimum nocossi-:y for the City's protection; extinguish all interest in access easement to Shadyvood Road; and Iands :apinq of the ramp aroa aster romo� a of r-imp. Motion, Aves (-3) - Nays (0) . Jeanne Mabusth, Zoning Administrator, reviewod with LAIARIANCE the City Council the variance request of Steven 1396 Baldur Park Road Posnic':, 1396 Baldur Park Road. 4664 Steven Posnick Butler moved, iiurr seconded, to approve the rialca- request of Steven Posnick, 1396 Baldur Par” Road, per the Planning Commission recommendations of November 16, 1981. Motion, Ayes (5) - `Jays (0) . Mayor Van :Vest moved, Fiurr seconded, to table the CONDITIONAL USE ?ERMIT aftar-the-_`ac'.: conditioal use permit of Rich rd 659 Mtka. Highlands La. Speeter, 659 Minnetonka Highlands, per �he r,_-quQst Richard Speeter of the applica:.t. :Motion, Ayes (5) - "Jars (0) . Jeanne Mabusth, Zoning Administrator, re-iewed with RECONSIDER riOTTON the City Council the request of ,-Jilliam Sexton, 1495 Greentrees Road 1495 Greentrees Road to reconsider the City Council's Sexton previous action concerning the removal of tire_ caretaker's house. Mt. Sexton was present. Mayor V moved, Hurr seconded, to request staff to draft a resolution to be signed -off by William Sax;:.on, 1495 Greentrees R--)ad, to extend the time-frami for the remov.A1 of the caretaker's house to May 1, 1982; that the h^use not be used for ozcupancy between now and May 1, 1982. Motion, ayes (5) - Nava, (0). Mayor V�,., Nest no ,ed, Butler seccndud, t�) adept RESOLUTION i1342 Resolution #1342, A Re-olution Providing The Revenue Bonds Issuance And Sale Of A Rc-enue Bond Pursuant To rlelson/Crear Chapter 474, Minnesota - atutes, To Provide Funds To Be Leaned To William Crear, Jr. .and Jon R. Nelsen For Industrial Development Project, ail:] to approve ill other do(:umi,r is submitted with this resolution. Motion, Ayez (5) - r..173 (0). CITY of ()ItO NO Control No. 664 I llflice lit x N,0('r� taI Iia,, \1it) n,•p-i.ta ".Qi•%IUnI,IP.11 ltffices 1'0cl,hune 47{ X- TO: Steven Posnick 4316 Aldrich Ave. So. Minneapolis, MN Meeting Date 12--14-81- Notice Date 12-15-81 Variance Conditional Use Permit Subdivision, Preliminary Subdivision, Final Copies to: Ronald Gehring — Scott Mann — * ksY;Y * ;csY �Y-� .� 4 �..l..l..t..4.1..1....4. 1. d. J.1 � :::::: ;'::::'::: =: is •� ;::': ;: •� :: •.': ;'; :':::- - :::: � .... .. 'i: - k . :Y;k :; � �Y :`.';: ;'; ;:.. ,::: ir:Y �Y;Y *i: kink COUNCIL ACTION Vote: 5 For Against Abstention MOTION to recommend approval of your lot area and lot width variance subject to the findings and conditions setforth in the nrigi a_r j- Planning Commission recommendation to Council enclosed for your review. �k7kdt*•k�r*aY�F kkk;Yyt � •'k;Y � is �*** ;': rk•'�r;Y;k�r k***•k�ti-k ;: k**�Ir�r*�r�Y*-'k�k�-k�'k�Jnk;Y•k� *�k'k�k�r�F�•k�F�rk*tk•R'Ar**A DEADLINE DATE December 14, 1982 for submittal of new information (application may be considered formally withdrawn if information or explanation is not prnvided). X_ for Work Permit for work to begin for work to be application completed WORK PERMITS ARE REQUIRED - contact Building Inspe:tor before beginning work. VARIANCE APPROVAL is limited to the extent shown on approved Flans. Do not change plans. Variance authority expires one year after approval. CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL expl-es upon change of ownership or use, or on deadline date specified above. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - Applicant must provide all information and/or improvements required for final approval. Contact Toning Administrator. FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROV:',L - Applicant must L.av- arawings, resolution and all other requi,,,: ,locuments recorded, with r.ertification of such recording returned to it Ci'y by deadline date. Certified copies of otficlal City Council Minutes may be obtained-Fiy contacting the City Clerk. Allow At 'east three weeks from meeting date. To recommend approval of the lot ar-a and lot width variance of Dr. Steven Posnick based on th, "allowing findings: 1. - Lot 16, Block 1, Baldur Park an in single separate ownership prior to 19b . 2 - The proposed building site is consistent with the pattern of development of the s rounding neighborhood. 3 - There is no additional land available to combine with subject property. 4 - There have been no objections from t:he neighbors as far as the buildability of the lot. 5 - Lot area and lot width variance applications have been approved for the property back in 1--30-80 and 3-20-72. such approval is subject to the following conditions: 1 - Improvements on the site (to include patios, driveways, etc.) may not exceed 2,385 sf of hardcover. 2 - No setback variances will be granted to the requireO building env, -,lope. 3 - All structures must meet average lakeshore setback of houses on abutting lots - staff to designate setback line. 4 - Special consideration be given in location of driveway and garage is limiting unnecessary hardcover. 5 - Prior to issuance of a building permit, applicant must urnish the City , quit claim deed, deeding 5' of additional right of w-v for Baldur Park Road. 6 - At the time of the building plan review special care should be given tc the drainage along the east banks of the site. 7 - Applicant should be advised that a dock is an acce>sory structure and '.hat a principal structu -i must exist on the site prior :o the issuance of a building permit for now dock line.