Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketLAND USE PLANNING ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION CITY OF ORONO P.O. boa 66,'Crystal bay. Minnesota 55323 413-77S7 INSTRUCTIONS: Plasm first read the attached Information Sheet. Complete Items 1 13 ' I (Type or Print). If weeded. attach letter or other information to better describe your request. Incomplete applications will not be accepted. 1. PROPERTY ADDRESS Z C� rf L [ ) ILL Legal description shall be shorn on attached Survey, txhlbit 2. APPLICANT me. � 6t 'AA Q C. b i- Phone �y Mailing Address 3. OWNER „s. If Applicant to not owner. explain Phone EXHIBIT 1 wiling Address r _ Ii A- perty Acquired 06 - (Month/YeAr) (do)Ado not) also own other adjacent parcels of land 4. AGENT meme — Phone Firs Mailing Address 5. NOTICES Should be sent to: Applicant Owner Agent 6. PRESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT 7. PRESENT USE Residenti,l / (Other) _ US LIST OF EXHIBITS Description Initial Applicatiog must include: 1 �lication Fora. 2 % Proper[) Owners List 7 ✓ Certificate of Survey 0'� Fee Receipt I —1231211 Date Received By --�— A--o\ Staff Informatio" 4 ✓ Plat Nap S _✓ Inventory 6 staff cow is Other Information 7 m �d►nt a ✓C�� 11� 10 11 12 _ Vacant Land Vacant building(s) (1 cupied building(U) V DESCRIBE REQUEST ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ _ establish now use m/eontinue or expand existing use _ build paw Zadd on _ remodel _ replace Describe request in detail: /� -0 1) n P" 5 NOTICES Should be sent to: Applicant Amer Agent 6. PRESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT A — I G 7. PRESENT USE Residential / (Other) Vacant lAnd Vacant guilding(s) (ti cupied Building(1) 8. DESCRIBE REQUEST ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ _ establish now use m/.ontinue or expand existing We _ build now Zadd on _ remodel _ replace Describe request in detail: 1� -0 1) 1 �� ' n g, VARIANCE(S) REQUIRED to do- the requested Work: � Lot Area lot Width Rardcovet Setback ( y thFront _ Side ___ Roar) Other 10. Describe UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS preventing compliance with Zoning code requirements: 11. Describe UNDUE HARDSHIP or PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations 4 1 tii I+ 1 l of --s 1 z-c L a� s o n ��i� J �1�,c �4 r� o �ct1 Q� Q1 12. Describe EFFECT OF PROPOSED WORK on neighboring properties and on the neighborhood in general: The APPLICANT and the PROPERTY OWNER must The A/r6ICAKT hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unuoual expenses Incurred in review of this applfration, and certiftee that the information supplied to true and correct to the beat of his knovledpr. sign and date this application. The OWW" hereby ackn w1odges and agree• to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by Ctry staff, consultants, agents, coeelasion meersers, and Council members for purposes of tnveattgation and verification of this requeSt -)- - -- I ( �- 1.71 Applicant's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date (1_0) DAYS BEFORE PIANNI NC COMMISSION MEETING b� " nrpAo MENT OF FiNANCE E ri H T A-603 OVERNMENT CENTER7 5 E I POL I S , MN 55487 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST NAME F AD R SS DESCRIPTION ', J PAWL -L3,<Xt�d ff--.L-z AI)MA61L M4,00A-SPIR24k, h - - 353 6416,0`6 �i3445-7 �WV6 Am IuES 1pA 7 cA Owff tp M( ) F-cl- v6w f Naml 1�67 �It V„r M !��l/D N. (1611 Iq `-��/QSCuEST 7 Fz-,57 A CAW?W A No 14 QUOzqac � N M Ol lI / / �V�� « ►chat acts nwmsemw aR;l certMkate are an Accurate MW true representation of Infnrna- Von as appears this date (7n the records of ttw Henn. Co. finance _ Uky,. IV the b"t of my k nowilaUse end pellef. He C iMan�e J�visMn Owe in CITY OF ORONO LAND USE PLANNING STAFF COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS EXHIBIT 6 rage j. PREPARED FOR: Planning Commi.sion meeting (Date) __--.2 Ca,uncil m,-cting lusts) - ----- ------ - ----- ./ - _ - ---- _ BY: Istaff) ----— (staff) ---- - -- - - - - - - - ---- - -- APPLICATION REVIEWED BY: City Administrator -„_ City %ttorney _ City Engineer _ Village Planner Zoning Administrator Planning Commission Park Commission SPECIAL COMMENTS Public Works Coordinator Hennepin Cty. DOT _- Public Safety Director Minn. State DM Finance Director -- Minn. DNP — building :nspertor MCWD Septic inspector L.ACD (dates) Idates) IDS-- --- -- i SPECIAL COMMENTS 4 Arm �` . • r _ -- STAFF RECOMMENDATION AM -EVE application a• a,ba�itted APPROVE application subject to follo.rinq condition• TASLE application for additional information DENY application for reason• noted abov CITY OF ORONO EXHIBIT 6 Page 2 LAND USE PTLANNING STAFF COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED FINDINGS 1. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in questiun are peculiar to such property or immediately surrounding property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land to located; op The conditions applying to the structure or land in question are not peculiar to such property or imsmedistely surrounding property but do apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. 2. _ _ The granting of the application ✓ is _ _ is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property rig.t of the applicant. ]. The granting of the propr .ee variance will not in any way impair the public health, safety, comfort. morale or general welfare; Ofl The granting of the proposed variance may impair the public health, safety, comfort, morals or general welfare. 4. _✓_ The granting of the proposed variance will not be contrary to the intent of the comprehensive Land Use Plan or the Zoning Code; OP The granting of the proposed variance would be contrary to the intent of the Comprehensive land Use Plan or the Zoning Code. S. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrated hardships or difficulties; OR 6 The applicant has demonstrated no recognized hardship or difficulty and therefore the granting of such variance w .ld merely serve as a convenience to s•ich applicant. �.MMW6-7tT� r. r SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL a3 ft -7? lit Anua &W ALA 3. A J!:og *AL"AA4*-t - -7- 5. OT� CITY OF ORONO EXHIBIT 5 LAND USE PLANNING ZONING VARIANCE INVENTORI VARIANCFS REQUIRED DENSITY Lot As *a d? lot WOOL, L%r Zoning Use District 4-k-IC SETBACKS EXISTING Street (Front) Sid* Bids. to 6369. 26 Ft. wetlands F L P-�t, 4-7 M EXISTING rptoposm TIOTAL LAYr AJkr-A KAAnC0vrjt HARDCOVER rLALA.DCOVLA V)k A LAMM HARDCOVER 04 - ___x CODE SLCT Wtid 0 26 Ft. 0% Lake 0 7S Ft. 34.202 25% 34.202 tAke 73 - 2so Ft. 34.702 Lake ZSO - SOO Ft. 301L LALke 500 - 100C Ft. 3S% OTHER SECTIONS Svilding height (asas.) ►arking IM1n.) 11ff3O 1 Ria r __ EX I ST TNG __ ►RG /OS m VA.R I ANCE CODE SECTION LAND DIVLSIOI: _111 plat __- _ PAS unplatted d lots/parcel• per application AVAILAIILITY: adjacent lnt■/parcel• (I ) vacant 0 occupied — san.e ownership _ _ separate ownershlp January 1, 1975 06mership -_.Ingle separate _ corbined with other parcels not in this application TO►OGRAIMY includes: _V_ Lakeshore __— wetlands _ _ high ground ✓ level ground _ rolling hills steep slopes `_ open ores• w xd ed areas GEOGRA►MY affecting applic tion: ____ unusual lot shape _ unusual building location lot sire/shape: co".Jet ant inconsistent with neighborhood d.velop%ent AccESSs _ now_ existing City county/state — private UTILITIES: Cl" sewer available __Zcannected; city water _ available connected septic syatwe new pruposed _ _ existing conforrcing existing substandard _ _ existing non -conforming T AIM% 110 r Subject lot is _ .__ vacant (L occupied EXISTING LAND USE can red to t zoning use district:: Y conforming use ►R. 0OAL 6affect• 7principal _ accessory bull, nj or use ISTRUCTURES _ conditional use _ non-rnnfortsing use EXISTING BUILDINGS _ do _ L do trot coaply with zoning perfosseance standards p Deficiencies: 4.SL _ tt_Jiili. e PROPOSAL T PL entirely NEW Luilding or use review as Wrw building or use (cost exceeds SOS rMV) review as ExiAN51OM of existing (cost less than SO11 rxv) Existing building IAIR K-,RpcE7 VALUE (yr) _ $ PROPOSAL will will not reduce an existing substandard yard dissension TAXES 6 ASSF'SSMENTS PRO►[Nrrr iU L II1, ,� v 0.e 1 `t t.J o b K ;L l G ( ^ i f _.�_ ) I Loma/Parcels owned In common are are not legelly cvabinad for tax purpsrsee. TACLS, are .'.,u current are D[LIMpUT.NT to year Aaase•aan�• O�riad 1__ so~ (not ____ units __ � ter (no) __ units c= t � 0 T ►7i� j 13 SOP x ,` `41 all AV U / Vi d15 �(► \ �1 ,. , R .titi :; ' • 45' i� ly�> te r.. 1s \ b If Alp, 17 22 gk P4(jr 2:4 ��� �• �1e �� p 1� `. � \ham � f—^•y� ' 2 `' ,� �• ' � (i) N� �Z) •' y1-6 ' 1 % le a „ 1 / w 6, N A' �• �' W000 Z ay 4uti' a 17 ' o i- Ll , t 0.t a` /N '� I � % * f �� , b • 4 ' �• e78 Port of (pl 2,elock t, 5� No 21J 4'� Crystal any Vas• , a 6 ke' s 34 43 ,R.G..•J --ct PI 44-v FXHIQIT 37 sc. ego �•, _ . w Z . J s C (NORTH ARMJ LAKE fA � ll,f�.r• �.{• �:_ its 10 MINUTES OF A PUNNIM C -MMISSION Y; TING BF.T.D !4017:?MER 7, 1977 - :AGE 7 The project(-d location for disposal of the rpolls was the rain concern of the Commission. Orono hss ndopted a policy to deny previous applicRtions for disporR1 of si,oils within 1,000 ft. of the shoreline. After a lengthy discussion, ffassel movedo Hannah seconded, 75 table this applleRLion with the reques thnt a detailed so Trip ar.4 detailed plan for dredging be siiLvnitted with the under- stauding that the dredging and spoils dei.osit will not violate Ordinance J.125� and with the understaraiing that the loud -cat dredging method will ope.ate from the environm.•ntal standpoint as reprer-nted. 'rhe Planning Con.Mssien giw•:s co.r.,eptliRI ar,1 val to going forward end getting this data with the understanding that approval of the projecte:i spoils disposal site would be determined after careful rc:v:ew of all reports doeu*,enting aivPntngLcs from project Hnd F ;su -,Ince that project w:)uid not adversely effect the quality of the water. Proposed dislx,sal site should be u,srked. Motion - Ayes (4), Nays (1) - Hurr, Abstain (1) - McDonald. Mr. Butterfield was present. Re is requesting an addition to the exist'ng stricture. The eiiltion to Vie south end of tt.e house would not interfere with the existing non-conforning side yard setback to the north. The Zoning Administrator advised ti,at staff had issued a permit for the family and recreation room portion subject to approval of the foyer. The survey submitted was somewhat vague. The Planning Commission Interpreted the survey to indicate the existing front yard setback to be 24 ft. A variance of 81 ft. would be required. After some review, Harsel m. ved, approval of the 18 ft. side yard varian•' per plan submitted. Abtion Ayes (6), ;lays (0). Hamnerel seconded, to recommend and 81 ft. front setback Mr. hblde wns present. He is requesting approval to construct a second story on his existing residence which is currently non -conforming in lot area, 1Fke and side setbacks. The proposal would not increase tine existing T,aryieover. The .,ronosed Flan ind'.cates a 20 ft. height limit. Mr. Which informed the Planning Commission this application pas submitted prior to the action recently taken by Council granting staff approval of tituat.ions of this nature. 'Me Yl !�ru 'ram Ccrvn:esion sup�ested the apnl icrint cor,bne tare subje-ct pro_ erty with his property ecross t*,e street. Tne applicant in{iicated no objection to this. He was advised that a lot combination would eliminate any building on this Froperty across the street. W-Dr-nald ►-:,wed, Hsi.,:-icrel seconded, to api rival of the variance sabjerct to combination of Tots 8, 17 pnd 18 into one j.areel. Justification; no increase in hardcover. ►UtIon - Ayes (6), Nays (0). IARF.N BUi"I'FM IPLD 3925 WATeRVOWN HEAD FifWr & SIDE SMACK FOR HOUSE ADDITTON TO EX1 TIN 'VON-CONY'ORMING WCATIOU f326 ✓�YMD10 "MM. ' : DIZZ 1428 BALDUR PAPK ROAD VARIANCE - LOT AREA & KIV AND TAKESHORE A SIDE YARD SF.i'BACK ON EXISTTNG NON- COMPORMING IOT AND h0USE 1327 RrGUi.AR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, NOVEMBER 14, 1977 Page 17 Planning Commission tleet[i.7q - November 7, 1977 VARIANCE 3925 Watertown Road Mr. Butterfield presented proposal. The survey (Continued) submitted with the proposal is somowhat vague. The Commission interpreted the survey to indicate the existing front yard setback to be 24 ft. The proposed five foot foyer woald reduce this setback to 19 ft. A variance of 81 ft. wo,.ild be required. The Planning Commission recommended :approval of the variances. Council Meeting - Noverribor 14, 1977 # 75 Butler moved, rsek seconded, to approve the variance request of Loren Butterfield, 3925 Watertown Road, per the Planning Commission recommendations. Hot ion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Mr. Alan Olson, Assistant Building & Zoning ARIANCE Administrator, entered into the record the 1428 Raldur Park following information concerning a variance #327 request of Raymond tiolde, 1428 Baldur Park Road, Raymond tiolde dated October 13, 1977, which states: This district is zoned as follows: Area - 1/2 acre (21,780 sq. ft.), width - 100 ft., lake setback - 75 ft., side setback - 10 ft. Mr. Molde is requesting approval to construct a second story expansion on his existing residence which is currently non -conforming in lot area width and lake and side setbacks. The following variances would be necessary for approval: Area - approx. 13,000 sq. ft. Width 50 ft. FE X H I E31 Lake setback - 13 ft. Side setback - 2.1 ft. This proposal would not increase the existing hardcover area or percentage. The enclosed survey indicates the location with no increase in house area. The enclosed sketch for hour expansion indicates the second story only with a 20 ft. height limit. I sue no problem here, but we might consider applicant obtaining letter of no objection from irnnediate neighbor. (Continued) Road I :R MEETING OF THE OR0140 COUNCIL, NOVEMBER 14, 1977 Page 18 .fining Corunission Meeting - Nov,:Tlher 7, 1977 r. Molde was present. Commission recoi:uended approval subject to combination of three sub- standard parcels he now owns (Parcels 8, 17 & 18). Justifications: 1. Proposal does not increase hardcover. 2. Condition eliminates two suhstr.ndard lots. Mr. Molde was informed by Commission that recommended combination would elim-nate second substandard building site. Council Meeting - November 14, 1977 Pesek moved, Butler seconded, to approve the variance r(-.­iest of Raymond molde, 142d Baldur Park Road, per the Planning Commission recom- mendations. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0) . Mr. Alan Olson, Assistant Building & 7oning Administrator, entered into th,� record the follow- ing information concerning Tonka West Development, 2477 Shadywood Road, dated October 24, 1977, whi r-h states: VARIANCE 1428 Baldur Park Road (Continued) #9:'75 The City Council approvtd plans subject to County approval of relocated driveway access, staff approval of building code requirements and engineer's review and approval of drainage. Staff to review assessment requirements for the next neeting. Staff - October 26, 1977 - Assessment Review The existing building was built in 1969 on Tract B, RLS 88. The sewer was connected in 1969, water in 1973. Tracts A & B are not combined and .are shown under separate ownership, but are both included on the site plan of this addition. The addition will be within Tract B. 'PUNKA WEST DEVELOPMENT 2477 Shadywood Road #330 Frevert & Hall Tract A: assessed sewer interceptor and lateral, no units: sewer paid 1967 assessed water lateral and one commercial unit: pending Tract B: assessed sewer interceptor and lateral, 1 i_nit: sewer paid 1969 assessed water lateral and 2 commercial units: water paid 1977 No sewer connection unit has been charged for the vacant Tract A= one unit was paid on Tri.ct B, but the City has been billing for two units consistent with the water assessment. Total assessment for A i B: 1 sewer unit, 3 water units. (Continued) MINITTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEET 'T,D ON APRTL 23, 1979 Page 5 Mr. Werner was present. Mr. Wer.ier was informed of staff's request that the shed be removed as the garage would be of sufficient size for storage. The applicant is requesting a front yard setback of 24' which is a variance of 6' .as well as a hardcover variance. Wilson moved to approve the variance as requested subject to: 1. Letter from Cordon Coffin verifying 75' lakeshore setback so staff can recheck the hardcover calculations. 2. Shed must be removed by final inspection of the garage. Motion seconded by Adams. Vote: Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion passed unanimously. JIM P. WERNER 1408 Baldur Park Rd., VARIANCE (#473) Mr. and Mrs. Molde were present. Mr. and Mrs. /R. M. MOLDE Nyquist, 1432 Baldur Park Road, were present and 1428 Baldur stated that they had no objections to the proposed VARIANCE addition. The main issue was increasing the amount (#475) of hardcover within 75' of the lake. It was also discussed that if the lots were combined the hardcover variance would be less than the 7% requested. Hammerel moved to approve the variance request siting the hardship of the configuration of the existing structure, that the addition will not extend any farther toward the lake, and tt,e size will not effect drainage. Motion seconded by Wilson. Vote: Ayes (5), Nays (2). Hannah felt that since he has been on the Commission, generally the policy has been whenever possible riot to grant building within 75' of the lake. Hurr felt the approval was inconsistent with previous Planning Commission decisions. Pa rk kd . REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, MAY 8, 1979 Page 2 Butler moved, Massengale seconded, to approve the VARIANCE variance request of R. M. Molde, 1428 Baldur Park 1428 Baldur Park :toad Road, subject to the combination of Lots 8, 17 & 18.c #475 Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (1). Councilmember iiurr Nay. Mo1de Butler moved, Paurus seconded, to adopt Resolution RESOLUTION #1028 #1028, A Resolution Approving A conditional Use 1595 Bohns Point Road Pernit For Dredging By David Dunlap, as amended David Dunlap to include "suction-iredging with on -site disposal #424 or clam shell dredging with off -site disposal. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Mayor Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, to table the CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT request for a conditional use permit of Richard Oliver,3898 Cherry Avenue 3898 Cherry Avenue, until the next meeting. Notion, #458 Ayes (5) - flays (0) . Richard Oliver Mayor Van Nest moved, iiurr seconded, to approve the VARIANCE variance request of Jim P. Werner, 1408 Baldur Park 1408 Baldur Park Road Road, hardship being narrowness of lot and location #473 of garages. Motion, ;.-,es (5) -- Nays (0) . Jim P. Werner. Mayor Van Nest noved, Butler :seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION $1029 Resolution 01029, A Resolution Changing The Name Spates Avenue Of Central Avenue To Spates Avenue In The City Of Orono. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Mayor Van Nest moved, tassengale seconded, to defer EASEMENT un'_il the next meeting the easement matter at 1410 1410 3ohns Point Road Sohns Point Road. notion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Paurus moved, Hurr seconded, to table until the next JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE meeting thj 1979 Joint_ Use Dock License for the Fox- Foxhill Association hill Homeowners Association. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Butler moved, purr seconded, to amend Resolution WINDWARD MSARL`7E L?CE%SE $102s, permitting all slips and buoys licensed in 1978 to be legally installed and used in 1979. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). tlassenyale moved, Butler seconded, to adopt Resolution RESOLUTION #1030 01030, A Resolution Directinq Staff To Issue A Gayles Marina License Commercial Dock License To Gayles Marina Corporation Subject To Conditions doted Herein For The Period Of .Tanuary 1, 1979 To December 31, 1979. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). Councilmenher Paurus abstained. (Cant 1nued) CITY of ORONO ON "'.ice Nos 66• Crystal Bay, Minnesota 5M23 • Muni:-' ' (Mess Teleohone 4737357 Mr. R. M. Molde 1428 Baldur Park Poad Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL ACTION Control No. 475 XX variance Conditional Use Permit Subdivision, Prelim. Subdivision, Final Date of Meeting: _ May 1979 Vk-ter: 4 _ For _ 1 _Against Abstention Date of Notice'` Action: Approval: As submitted subject to applicable ordinance requirements X_Approval: Subject to conditions noted --Deferral: Pending receipt of information noted Referral: Review by others, as noted Denial: For reasons noted NOTES 6 SPECIAL CONDITIONS: �ouncil approved lot setback and hardcover variance (and lot area/lc,L width variance) for construction of house a0ditian and remodeling a,, proposed finding hardship of existing house location, subject to legal lot combination of applicant's three lots (which application was made April 24, 1979). Deadlines: X Variance approval expires one year after the meeting date. Contact building inspector for required permits. _ Conditional Use Approval _Must be renewed annually. Expires on __Must be renewed upon change in ownership or use. Preliminary Subdivision approval expires after one year of -ting date. act Zoning Administration for final plat requirements. Fi subdivision approval expires 6 months after meeting date. ntact Zoning Administration for filing requirements and document approval. _ Deferred items may be declared formally withdrawn if applicant fails to provide information within one month of meeting date, or by date specified by Council. If you desire certified copies of the official City Council Minutes, they are available from the Deputy City Clerk upon review and approval by the Council.