HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketMINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, April 24, 2006
7:00 o'clock p.m.
*7. #06-3177 WILLIAM AND ANN MCCRACKIN, 4355 CIIlPPEWA LANE-
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -RESOLUTION NO. 5457
Murphy moved, White seconded, adopting RESOLUTION NO. 5457, a Resolution granting a
conditional use permit for plumbing in an accessory structure at 4355 Chippewa Lane.
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
*8. #06-3182 JEFF MIKKELSON, 1436 BALDUR PARK ROAD-VARIANCE-
RESOLUTION NO. 5458
Murphy moved, White seconded, adopting RESOLUTION NO. 5458, a Resolution granting
lot area and width variances to construct a new residence provided the applicant reduce the
street side deck to 35 s.f. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
*9. #06-3186 MINNETONKA PORTABLE DREDGING FOR ROBERT ERICKSON,
372 WESTLAKE STREET -CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -RESOLUTION NO. 5459
-Murphy moved, White seconded, adopting RESOLUTION NO. 5459, a Resolution granting a
conditional use permit for a permanent dock at 372 Westlake Street. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
*10. #06-3190 BRUCE DAYTON AND RICHARD RINEHART, 965/990/985 OLD
LONG LAKE ROAD -LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT -RESOLUTION NO. 5460
Murphy moved, White seconded, adopting RESOLUTION NO. 5460, a Resolution approving
a Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement and Lot Area Variances for Properties located at
965 and 985 Old Long Lake Road -File #06-3190. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
MAYOR/CITY COUNCIL REPORT
Sansevere commented that a group organizing a potential natural foods co-op is looking to lease
space in Orono or Long Lake.
Murphy indicated that he liked the idea and could see a fit with a co-op in this area.
Murphy stated that he was expecting big things to come out of a work session the following
evening regarding public works and water.
McMillan reported that Del Miller, of the 3 Rivers Park District, said that the board had approved a
task force design development phase for the Dakota Rail Trail and looked forward to getting design
specifics on the trail. She noted that if all goes according to plan, the project could begin going out
for bids in the fall.
Murphy added that he had attended the State of the County address given by Representative Randy
Johnson recently and during the reception approached Commissioner McLaughlin about the
Dakota Line. Murphy pointed out that McLaughlin voiced his, as well as the County's support of
the project and even acknowledged that some connector funding grants might be available.
PAGE 7 of 10
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, April 10, 2006
7:00 o'clock p.m.
(3. #05-3136 TROY BROITZMAN, 1860 SHORELINE DRIVE, Continued)
White noted the reason the Council is willing to change the average setback line is because the neighbors
are. in .agreementwith .the _change .-White commented_he likes the new _design of the driveway and patio._
Sansevere complimented the applicant for making the changes as recommended at the previous meetings.
Co~ard stated he would be meeting with the architect on the 22nd but that he has not reviewed the plans in
great detail at the present time.
Murphy inquired how Mr. Coward feels about the average setback line.
Coward stated he would prefer the house forward rather than back further on the lot.
Murphy stated he does appreciate the efforts that the applicant has taken to redesign his plans and that he
likes the idea of the split garage. Murphy indicated he likes the appearance of the proposed residence.
McMillan stated in her opinion the new design helps to add value to the property and that the proposed
plan appears to be workable. McMillan stated she does like the design of the garage ..
White stated the new design does address a number of the issues raised by the Council.
Murphy encouraged the applicant to meet with the other two neighbors to gain their input on the new
design.
Sansevere moved to table Application #05-3136, Troy Broitzman, 1860 Shoreline Drive, to allow the
applicant time to submit more detailed plans.
Broitzman inquired whether the Council would be agreeable to a partial or full basement under the garage
to obtain fill. ·
Sansevere recommended the applicant discuss that issue with Staff.
Gaffron stated he does not anticipate a problem with that proposal.
Murphy seconded the above motion. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
*4. #05-3139 HILL SCHOOL, 2180 NORTH SHORE DRIVE -CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT REVISIONS -RESOLUTION NO. 5443
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5443, a Resolution granting
variances and a conditional use permit for Hill School ofMinnesota, Inc., 2180 North Shore Drive.
VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
5. #06-3182 JEFF MIKKELSON, 1436 BALDUR PARK DRIVE -VARIANCE
Jeff Mikkelson, Applicant, and John Mikkelson, son, were present.
PAGE 3 oflS
(5.
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, April 10, 2006
7:00 o'clock p.m.
#06-3182 JEFF MIKKELSON, 1436 BALDUR PARK DRIVE, Continued)
Curtis stated the applicant is requesting variances in order to construct a new single-family residence .
. --The variances consist of lot area.andJoLwidth variances.for.a Jot 0 .19 acre in area. an.d 51 '-5_5' in width =--...
where 100' is normally required and 0-75' hardcover variance to allow 987 square feet or 24.39 percent
hardcover where 0 percent is normally allowed and 75'-250' hardcover variance to allow 1,494 square
feet or 36.16 percent hardcover where 25 percent is normally allowed. A conditional use permit is also
required in order to conduct land alterations below the 931.5' 100-year floodplain elevation.
The applicant has submitted a revised plan at the request of the Planning Commission and has also
submitted an alternate plan based on discussions with the neighbor to the south. The alternate plan shows
the home shifted seven feet closer to the lake in order to put the home in line with each of the neighboring
homes and the deck in line with the neighboring decks.
The Planning Commission voted 5-1 to recommend approval of the variances as requested provided the
applicant reduces the street side deck to 35 square feet. The dissenting Commissioner felt that further
hardcover reductions could be made.
Planning Staff does not recommend that the alternate plan be approved as the result would be a further
encroachment toward the lake. Staff recommends approval of the variances consistent with the Planning
Commission's recommendation.
Mikkelson stated he has taken steps over the years to protect the water quality of the lake and that he is
proposing a smaller sized house to help minimize the runoff. Mikkelson stated he has reduced the
hardcover on the lot wherever possible.
Mikkelson stated he would like the house moved closer to the lake to gain more privacy from his
neighbors, noting that presently they are able to look directly into his bedroom. Mikkelson requested the
Council approve the alternate plan.
Sansevere questioned whether the neighbors could truly see into the applicant's residence from their
decks. Sanseyere suggested the applicant consider purchasing drapes for his windows.
Murphy stated it appears from the plans that if the house is moved seven feet forward, the neighbors
would be able to look inside the applicant's house easier.
Mikkelson demonstrated the line of sight from the neighbors' residences. Mikkelson stated his neighbors
sit on their decks regularly.
White stated the Council would prefer to have the deck outside of the 0-75' setback and that the house is
not the problem. White noted the lot is a small lot and would require lot area and lot width variances in
order to construct a house.
Murphy stated he is not opposed to the seven feet and that the view from the lake would be better if the
houses were all lined up. Murphy noted the proposed deck is smaller than the other two neighbors.
McMillan inquired whether the neighbors' decks are located into the 0-75' setback somewhat.
PAGE 4 of 15
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, April 10, 2006
7:00 o'clock p.m.
(5. #06-3182 JEFF MIKKELSON, 1436 BALDUR PARK DRIVE, Continued)
Gaffron stated the neighbors' decks do extend into the 0-75' setback but that the objective of the
· ordinances is to require everyone to build outside of the 0-75' setback when they wish to rebuild or make
improvements to their lot. Gaffron noted the DNR has a 50-foot setback and that the City attempts to
keep that wherever possible. Gaffron noted proposal one is at approximately 42 feet and that a hardship
would need to be found to encroach further into that setback. Gaffron stated in his opinion the DNR
setback is more important than the average lakeshore setback.
Murphy inquired how old the other two houses are.
A neighbor in the audience indicated the houses are approximately 30 years old.
Gaffron stated a 75-foot setback would not allow a buildable lot.
Sansevere inquired whether this would be precedent setting if the deck were allowed to encroach into the
0-75' setback. Sansevere stated he would like to be consistent with what the council has allowed in the
past.
Mikkelson stated he has a number of addresses along the lakeshore that have recently been granted more
hardcover than what he is proposing.
Sansevere stated the Council has to do what is right and be consistent.
Jurgens inquired whether there is a prow that extends forward from the deck.
Mikkelson stated the prow creates less hardcover.
Gaffron indicated it extends approximately four feet over the average lakeshore setback line.
Jurgens stated the extension of the roofline should be taken into consideration. Jurgens stated the reason
for his dissention on the vote was that he felt the hardcover could be reduced further.
Murphy inquired whether the prow is an extension of the roof or the house.
Gaffron stated the prow is an extension of the house and extends approximately another four feet.
Mikkelson stated his builder told him the overhang was a foot and a half around the house.
Murphy stated the overhang would make the house look a lot closer to the lake if the home is moved
seven feet forward.
Sansevere inquired whether the neighbor has a concern with his view given the prow.
The neighbor indicated he does not.
Gaffron stated the plan that was approved by the Planning Commission has a 45-foot setback. Gaffron
indicated staff would prefer a plan that would be closer to the 50-foot setback.
PAGE 5 of 15
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, April 10, 2006
7:00 o'clock p.m.
(5. #06-3182 JEFF MIKKELSON, 1436 BALDUR PARK DRIVE, Continued)
White stated he does not see a hardship to grant a variance to allow the house to be moved closer to the
... lake. . ... ---_._ .. "·-----·· ., ... _______ , ______ -----·-··:.:::·.:_ .. .,.,,.... .c--... -·---------•--•· .
Murphy stated they would like to meet the DNR setback of 50 feet as much as possible. Murphy inquired
whether the applicant eliminated the stooped entryway in the back.
Mikkelson stated he did.
Murphy stated he would not be opposed to the covered entryway.
Mikkelson stated the house closer to the lake would allow him a better view of the lake to keep an eye on
his son.
Murphy moved, McMillan seconded, to direct staff to draft an approval resolution for Application
#06-3182, Jeff Mikkelson, 1436 Baldor Park Road, with the condition that the house be located per
the Planning Commission recommendation, but not be moved seven feet closer to the lake as
requested by the applicant, and with the understanding that a covered stoop would be allowed in
the back. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
6. #05-3123 STONEWOOD DESIGN/BUILD FOR MIKE HART, 1005 L~EN LANE -
REVIEW OF REMODELING VS REBUILD STATUS
Sven Gustafson, Builder, and Dave McDonald, structural engineer, were present.
Gaffron indicated Staff has been working with the builder on this project, noting that the builder was
brought on board later in the process. It has been determined that less of the original house and
foundation would be remaining than what was initially thought at the time the application was approved.
Gaffron noted a portion of the house was located in the 0-7 5' setback.
Based on the foundation report by the applicants' engineer, two of the four existing basement walls are in
such a precarious state that they need extensive repair. The degree of foundation repairs needed suggest
that the applicants would ultimately be better served by replacing rather than repairing those two walls.
Gaffron indicated the current plans indicate that only the foundation cap will remain of the existing house
superstructure and will need some shoring up. Two of the foundation walls need extensive repair, and the
remaining foundation walls are either being replaced with wood framing or will remain as-is.
Gaffron stated approval was granted based on the understanding that this would be a remodel rather than
a rebuild and that the Council has the option to, one, conclude that this project still meets the intent of the
variance approval and allow the inadequate foundation walls to be replacedrather than repaired, which
would ultimately result in a better quality structure or, two, allow the project to go forward but only allow
the foundation to be repaired as currently proposed and not replaced or, three, conclude that this should
now be considered as a total rebuild and direct the applicants to start over in their design process to build
a home meeting the 75' setback requirement and reduce hardcover.
PAGE 6 of15
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, March 13, 2006
7:00 o'clock p.m.
*6. #06 -3169 CHRISTOPHER DIESEN, 1100 TOWNLINE ROAD-PRELIM]NARY PLAT-
RESOLUTION NO. 5435
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5435, a Resolution Granting
Preliminary Approval of a Class III Subdivision for Property Located at 1100 Townline Road.
VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
7. #06-3173 CITY OF ORONO-ORDINANCE AMENDMENT: INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
ZONING STANDARDS
Sansevere inquired whether Mr. Johnson had any comments or concerns with the revisions.
Johnson stated the sound barrier in his opinion is a little overkill. Johnson noted they do not have any
plans for erecting any signs facing south but questioned whether that would be ineffective or accomplish
anything. Johnson stated they would like to see this amendment completed one way or another and that
their main issues have been addressed.
McMillan stated after reading the memo from Steve Grittman, she is fine with the reconunendations
regarding retail.
White stated he is also fine with the retail. White inquired about the signage facing south.
Murphy stated he has received more than one comment from the people who live across that area since
the cover is gone, but that the comments were not directed at Morrie's. Murphy stated the concern raised
had to do with the lights .
Johnson stated they are ready to see the ordinance adopted.
Greg White, VCI Capital, stated he was not present at the last Council meeting, but that he believes most
of the proposed revisions are appropriate and desirable. White stated Section 78-826, which relates to the
building design and architectural standards, is, in their opinion, not appropriate for an industrial park.
White stated that section imposes a higher standard of construction than other adjoining districts across
the street, as an example, and that the language seems to be quite subjective. White stated they do not
believe that the proposed revisions, particularly in that section, reflect the reality of what the industrial
park is . White noted the industrial park consists of 44 acres, with 11 acres still buildable. White noted
only a small percentage of the industrial park would be impacted by the higher costs and would not be
consistent with the other buildings located within the industrial park. White stated the higher quality
construction would also need to attract a higher paying tenant and that he does not feel it is possible to
attract that type of tenant.
Greg White suggested as an alternati v e that the design requirements for the industrial district not be more
stringent than what currently exists. White noted he has put his comments into written form .
Acting Mayor White inquired whether the concern deals with less massing in the commercial district
than an industrial district.
Gaffron stated the City 's existing B districts do not have much in the way of standards and that the same
kind of upgrades could be done to the other dishicts . Gaffron stated in the early discussions w ith the
City's consultant there \Vas a question on whether the City was going to go with performance standards
PAGE 21 of27
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Tuesday, February 21, 2006
6:00 o'clock p.m.
(#05-3161 LOREN FRITZ CONTINUED)
Staff recommends granting prelimina1y plat approval.
Andrews stated he would be happy to address any concerns that the Planning Commission may have.
Rahn opened the public hearing at 7:37 p.m.
There were no public conunents regarding this application.
Rahn closed the public hearing at 7 :37 p.m.
Rahn inquired whether the ivy plantings would creep up the stone.
Andrews stated that is correct. Andrews stated due to the amount of trees in the area, this area is rather
shaded and they chose ivy to grow up the wall.
Rahn stated he likes the choice of the ivy.
Jurgens inquired what the City's position is on the maintenance of the ivy screening.
Gaffron stated language could be included in the resolution that the ivy has to be maintained on a
pennanent basis and could also be incorporated into covenants on the properties.
Jurgens inquired what material the wall is made out of.
St. Martin stated the material is precast concrete block and that the wall is a gravity wall, with the blocks
being bigger on the bottom and smaller as they go up.
Bremer moved, Leslie seconded, to recommend approval of Application #05-3161, Loren Fritz,
3845 North Shore Drive, subject to the screening of the retaining wall with ivy.
VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0.
NEW BUSINESS
5. #06-3169 CHRISTOPHER HAROLD DIESEN, 1100 TOWNLINE ROAD, SUBDIVISION
7:42 P.M. -7:50 P.M.
Christopher Diesen, Applicant, was present.
Curtis stated the applicant is requesting a Class III preliminary plat approval to create two lots on one
block at 1100 Townline Road . The property is located on the east side ofTownline Road between
Wate1iown Road and the Burlington Northern Railroad . The current zoning for the property is RR-IA,
one Family Rural Residential District, which requires five-acre minimum lot sizes . The property is
guided for Rural Residential in 2000 -2020 Land Use Plan requiring a minimum lot size of five acres.
The total lot width of the subject property is 490 feet, not allowing for the required 300 feet of width for
each lot. The applicant is also requesting a variance from the 300 feet required lot width as part of this
application.
PAGE 11
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Tuesday, February 21, 2006
6:00 o'clock p.m.
(#06-3169 CHRISTOPHER HAROLD DIESEN CONTINUED)
Curtis stated this site does contain two wetlands and areas of challenging topography. Lot 1 consists of
6.14 acres with 5 .98 acres of dry buildable, and Lot 2 consists of 7 .65 acres, with 7.5 8 acres of dry
buildable. With the exception of the request for the lot width variances, this proposal meets RR-lA
standards.
The applicant is proposing a side-by-side lot division due to the topography of the eastern portion of the
property. Staff finds the proposed lot widths satisfactory and reasonable building envelopes have been
determined and meet all required setbacks within the reduced lot widths. Feasible preliminary and
alternate septic sites have been identified and approved by the City's septic inspector, with the
requirement that a new mound system be installed on proposed Lot 2 where the existing farm is prior to
final plat approval.
. Planning Staff recommends approval of the application subject to the conditions outlined on page five of
the report.
Diesen noted he did appear before the Planning Commission approximately one year ago but that he ran
into some legal issues with the property owner, which has delayed this application. Diesen noted he
would be constructing a new mound system on the property but requested that they be allowed to get final
plat approval so they could construct the mound system for the old place and the new place at the same
time.
Rahn inquired whether the applicant has any other issues with the recommendations of the Planning Staff.
Diesen stated he does not and that he does not have a problem with putting something in writing
concerning the mound systems.
Rahn opened the public hearing at 7:47 p.m.
There were no public comments regarding this application.
Rahn closed the public hearing at 7:47 p.m.
Kempf inquired whether the Planning Commission has the ability to allow construction of both mound
systems at the same time.
Gaffron stated the City has allowed other property owners to construct a mound system later with the City
requiring a letter to that effect from the applicant and a letter of credit or other form of escrow to be on
file with the City.
Bremer moved, Kempf seconded, to recommend approval of Application #06-3169, Christopher
Harold Diesen, 1100 Townline Road, subject to the applicant complying with Staff's
recommendations regarding the two mound systems. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0.
PAGE 12
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
(952) 249-4600
TO: Jeff Mikkelson
1436 Baldur Park Rd
Wayzata, MN 55391
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances & CUP
DATE OF MEETING: April 24, 2006
ZONING FILE 06-3182
NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: June 1, 2006
COPIES:
VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST
Motion: To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution previously mailed to you
Please arrange to sign the 3 original resolution copies at the City Offices (Monday through
Thursday 7:30-5:00, or Fridays, 7:30 to 11:30). All persons with an interest in the property
must sign the resolutions.
Variance approval is limited to the extent shown on approved plan and as noted in the approval
resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to further review by the City. Variance approval
expires one year after date of approval. A building permit must be obtained no later than April 24,
2006.
If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Clerk
after review and approval by the City Council.
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, March 20, 2006
5. #06-3182 JEFF MIKKELSON, 1436 BALDUR PARK ROAD, VARIANCES,
7:28-7:42 P.M.
Jeff Mikkelson, Applicant, was present.
Curtis stated the applicant is requesting variances in order to construct a new single-family residence.
The variances consist of lot area and lot width variances for a lot .19 acre in area and 51 '-55' in width
where 100' is normally required, and a 0-75' hardcover variance to allow 987 square feet or 24 percent
hardcover where O percent is nonnally allowed, and a 75'-250' hardcover variance to allow 1,518 square
feet or 36.8 percent hardcover where 25 percent is nom1ally allowed. A conditional use permit in order to
conduct land alterations below the 931.5 100-year floodplain elevation is also required.
Staff reconm1ends approval of the lot width, lot area, lake setback and some level of hardcover variances
in conjunction with the redevelopment of this property . The applicant must receive approvals from the
MCWD for the work below the 931.5' elevation. Pla1ming Staff also recommends approval of the
conditional use pem1it for grading and fill within the floodplain incorporating the recommendations of the
MCWD and the City Engineer. Finally, the applicant will be required to submit an as-built grading plan
prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
The applicant is proposing to construct a new single-family residence on the property. The lot is
substandard in width and area and the application of the 75' lake setback allows for only about 40 feet of
buildable area depth. The applicants' property is a lot ofrecord and is nonconforming with respect to lot
area and lot width . Variances are required to rebuild any home on this property.
Mikkelson had nothing to add to Staffs report.
Rahn opened the public hearing.
There were no public comments regarding this application.
Rahn closed the public hearing.
Rahn indicated he does not really have any issues with this plan outside of the one issue that Staff
mentioned. Rahn inquired what the projection of the rear deck is.
Mikkelson stated 90 percent or more activity is in the front of the house and that the rear traffic is so
minimal and that he would be willing to remove or reduce the size of the rear deck. Mikkelson indicated
he would like to retain the front deck.
Rahn inquired what the size of the front deck is.
Gaffron stated it is 10 .5' by 7 '.
Rahn noted the two decks combined consist of 307 square feet. Rahn inquired whether there is a roof over
the front deck.
PAGE 12
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, March 20, 2006
(#06-3182 JEFF MIKKELSON, CONTINUED)
Mikkelson stated there is not.
Gaffron stated a portion of the deck could be removed. Gaffron stated the rear deck projects out seven
feet.
Curtis inquired whether the trellis over the front entry would be reduced as well.
The applicant's representative indicated it could be reduced.
Jurgens inquired whether the rear deck has to be the full length of the house.
Berg stated in her opinion it should be the full length of the house.
Jurgens stated in his view the length of the deck could be reduced and that it is not a necessity.
Rahn inquired what the size of the front deck should be.
Gaffron indicated half of the rear deck would be roughly 40 square feet.
Cmiis stated when the hardcover from the 0-75' and 75'-250' zones are combined, you would get 60.5
percent hardcover.
Bremer commented this is a small lot.
Rahn moved, Winkey seconded, to recommend approval of Application #06-3182, Jeff Mikkelson,
1436 Balclur Park Road, granting of lot width, lot area, lake setback and hardcover variances, with
the condition that the front deck be reduced to not exceed 35 square feet in size and with the
condition that the recommendations of the city engineer be incorporated into the applicant's plans.
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 1, Jurgens opposed.
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS
6. REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVES ATTENDING
COUNCIL MEETINGS FEBRUARY 27 AND MARCH 13, 2006
Jurgens repmied he attended the February 27 th City Council meeting, with the Sundby and Brooks'
applications being put on consent. Jurgens stated the ordinance amendment for the industrial park was
tabled.
Bremer reported on the March 13th City Council meeting, noting that the Narrows Saloon application was
basically approved, with Staff being directed to draft a resolution for approval at the next City Council
PAGE 13
Date Application Received: 02-22-06
Date Application Considered as Complete: 03-02-06
60-Day Review Period Expires: 05-02-06
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date: April 20, 2006
Item No.
Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Agenda Section:
Name: Melanie Curtis MV
Title: City Planner
Item Description: #06-3182, Jeff Mikkelson -14 3 6 Baldur Park Rd -Variances
Zoning District:
Lot Area:
Lot Width:
List of Exhibits:
ExhibitA-
Exhibit B -
Exhibit C -
Exhibit D -
LR-lC, Single Family Lakeshore Residential,½ acre & 100' width
0 .19 acre (8,179 s.f.)
51' @OHWL & 55'@ 75' setback
Resolution per Council decision
Council Packet of 04-04-06
Email from the Applicant 04-19-06
Draft Council Minutes 04-10-06
Application Summary:
On April 10, 2006 the City Council voted 4 -0 to approve the request for variances and a conditional
use permit for the construction of a new residence. Staff has drafted a resolution reflecting that
approval.
Planning Commission Recommendation
On March 20, 2006, Planning Commission voted 5 -1 to recommend approval of the variances as
requested provided the applicant reduce the street side deck to 35 s.f.. The dissenting Commissioner
felt that further reductions could be made.
Planning Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the attached Resolution consistent with the Planning Commission's
recommendation.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Adopt or amend the attached Resolution.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES
TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTIONS 78-350(B), 78-1279 AND 78-1288, AND
A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL
ZONING CODE SECTIONS 78-1116 & 78-1117
FILE NO. 05-3182
WHEREAS, Jeff P. Mikkelson, a single person, (hereinafter "the applicant") is
the owner of the property located at 1436 Baldur Park Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter
the "City") and legally described as follows:
Lot 6, Block 1, Baldur Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the
"property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a
variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-350(b) to allow construction of a new
residence on a lot 8,179 s.f. or 0.19 acre in area and 51'in width at the OHWL of Lake
Minnetonka and 55' in width at the 75' setback from the OHWL where 21,780 s.f. or½ acre in
area and 100' in width is normally required; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a
variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow construction of a new
residence to be located 50' from the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka where a 75' setback is
normally required; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a
variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1288 to allow 987 s.f. or 24.39%
hardcover within the 0-75' zone and 1,494 s.f. or 36.16% hardcover within the 75'-250' zone
where 0% and 25% respectively are normally allowed in order to construct a new residence; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a
conditional use permit pursuant to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1116 and 78-1117
in order to conduct land alterations including filling and excavation below 931.5' MSL or the
100-year floodplain elevation in conjunction with the construction of a new home.
Page 1 of 6
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 06-3182.
2. The property is located in the LR-IC Lakeshore Residential Zoning District
which requires a minimum lot area of½ acre and a minimum lot width of 100'.
3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on
March 22, 2006 and recommended approval of lot area, lot width, 0-75' and
75'250' zone hardcover and lake setback variances based on the following
findings:
a. The lot is significantly substandard in area and width and the ex1stmg
structure and hardcover on the lot are nonconforming. The property is served
with municipal sewer. A residence has existed on the property for many
years.
b. There is no additional land available to bring the lot width or lot area into
conformity.
c. The proposed structure complies with side yard, rear (street) yard, and average
lakeshore setback requirements.
d. A single family residence has existed on the property for many years.
e. Because the property has less than 10,000 s.f. in area it is allowed a 1,500 s.f.
structural footprint absent other factors. Construction of a 1,500 s.f. home
accounts for 29% of hardcover within the 75' -250' setback zone.
f. The applicants have proposed minimal driveway, walk, and deck in order to
limit the magnitude of the hardcover excesses.
g. Due to the fact that the property is the shallowest lot of all lots in the
neighborhood the home is proposed 50' from the OHWL of the lake.
Page 2 of 6
h. The size of the proposed residence and magnitude of hardcover variance is
consistent with other approved development in the neighborhood.
4. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on
March 22, 2006 and recommended approval of the conditional use permit based
on the following findings:
a. The fill proposed for this application is the minimum amount necessary to
accommodate a reasonable driveway access to serve the property.
b. A landscape plan will be submitted with the building permit application.
c. The filling and grading activities will be performed with only clean fill. This
requirement will be monitored by the City Engineer.
d. The applicant will be excavating below the 931.5' elevation to compensate for
the floodplain volume filled.
5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by
the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the
health, safety and welfare of the community.
6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to
it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting
the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire
hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a
convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable
hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the
applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code
and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants
variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-350(b), to allow construction of a new
residence on a lot 8,179 s.f. or 0.19 acre in area and 51 'in width at the OHWL of Lake
Minnetonka and 55' in width at the 75' setback from the OHWL where 21,780 s.f. or½ acre in
area and 100' in width is normally required; and Section 78-1279 to allow the new residence to
Page 3 of 6
be located 50' from the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka where a 75' setback is normally required;
and Section 78-1288 to allow 987 s.f. or 24.39% hardcover within the 0-75' zone and 1,494 s.f.
or 36.16% hardcover within the 75'-250' zone where 0% and 25% respectively are normally
allowed; and a conditional use permit pursuant to Zoning Code Sections 78-1116 and 78-1117 in
order to conduct land alterations below 931.5' MSL or the 100-year floodplain elevation in
conjunction with the construction of a new home.
1. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicant and annotated by
City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan
which are not in conformity with City codes will require further Planning Commission
and City Council review.
2. Hardcover in the 0-75' zone shall not increase above the level of 987 s.f. or 24.39%.
Hardcover in the 75-250' zone shall be limited to 1,494 s.f. or 36.13% per the proposed
plan and hardcover allowance summary as depicted on Exhibit A. Applicant is advised
that any future requests to increase hardcover or change the nature of existing/approved
hardcover shall require City approval, and increases in hardcover will not likely be
approved without concurrent reduction in existing hardcover.
3. Applicant shall remove all plastic or fabric liner material from the decorative landscape
beds on the property to ensure their permeability as non-hardcover surfaces.
4. Required removals of structure and hardcover shall be completed by the footing
inspection for the new home.
5. Approval from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District is required for the land
alterations below the elevation of 931.5' prior to the issuance of a building permit.
6. The lowest floor of the house shall be established no lower than the Regulatory Flood
Protection Elevation of 932.5' MSL.
7. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall verify site elevations and grading
and drainage information to satisfy the City Engineer that the elevations obtained under
winter conditions are reflective of actual site conditions and that all drainage shall be
handled in a manner that will not cause drainage problems for this residence or the
neighborhood.
Page 4 of 6
8. An as-built grading plan verifying compliance with the building permit, grading and
drainage plans shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for
the new residence.
9. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are
permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new
construction within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire
on that date (April 24, 2007).
10. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution
shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority
granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
11. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this
resolution and on behalf of the applicant and the applicant's heirs, successors and assigns,
hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 24 th day of April 2006.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor
Property Owner
Page 5 of 6
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ day of ____ ,
2006 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation
and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
Notary Public
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ day of ____ ,
2006 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and
said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
Notary Public
This instrument was acknowledged before me this_ day of _____ , 2006 by
Jeffrey P. Mikkelson, a single person.
Notary Public
Page 6 of 6
. .,
.~•,:\,\'\
lo
M
EXthi~,-A ·
!... BLACKTOP
'. ROM)WAY: ,.~\
/
-___,
/
/
/
--" \ .\ 5 \
&. '------
(931 .2)--
--~
0° 44'00" W 59.85 SANITARY SEWER
BALDUR PARK ROAD
Page 1 of 1
Melanie Curtis
From: Jeff Mikkelson Ueff_mikkelson@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 4:54 AM
To: Melanie Curtis
Subject: House Plans
Melanie ,
After speaking with Jim White last week I realized that I was confused by the way the average setback line was
drawn (as a straight line , not following the contour of the lake).
I am comfortable with what was approved and thank you so much for your time and patience .
I am probably a month out from applying for a building permit since I need to get soil samples , complete the final
blueprints and specs and get bids.
Please let me know if there is anything else I need to do .
Thank you ,
4/21 /2006
JEFF MIKKELSON •
Phone
Ema i l
W eb
1436 Ba ldur Park Rd., Orono, MN 55391
612.554 .3519
jeff mikkelson@hotmail.com
http://www.mikkelsons.com
5. #06-3182 JEFF MIKKELSON, 1436 BALDURPARKDRIVE-VARIANCE
Jeff Mikkelson, Applicant, and John Mikkelson, son , were present.
Curtis stated the applicant is requesting variances in order to construct a new single-family residence.
The v ariances consist of lot area and lot width variances for a lot O .19 acre in area and 51 '-5 5 ' in width
h
hardcover where O percent is normally allowed and 75 '-250' harocov er variance to atlo~.,l,~91 square
{
feet or 3 6.16 percent hardcover where 25 percent is nofll\ally all~w ed. A conditiona} use p7rinit is also
'·
required in order to conduct land alterations below the 93 l .5 ' 100 -year floodplain elevation.
The applicant has submitted a revised plan at the request of the Planning Commission and has also
submitted an alternate plan based on discussions vyi ththe neighoor to the south . The alternate plan shows
/ ;
:f
the home shifted seven feet closer to the la\(e in order _to put the home in line with each of the neighboring , I . , , .
homes and the deck in line with the.1ire'igl:lboring <leeks. , · ·-
1
The Planning Commission voted 5-1 t~'recommend'approval of tlie variances as requested provided the
.. ·""" applicant reduces the street side deck to 35 square feet . The dissenting Commissioner felt that further
hardcover reductions could be made:'
' "
Planning St1fi does110t recom~eod that the &,lternaJ plan be approved as the result would be a further , . ,
encroachrlient toward the lake . Staff}ecommends approval of the variances consistent with the Planning
Qom.mission 's recommendation .·
" Mikkelson stated he bas taken ,steps ov er the years to protect the water quality of the lake and that he is
proposing a smaller sized liouse to help minimize the runoff. Mikkelson stated he has reduced the
Mikkelson stated he would like the house moved closer to the lake to gain more privacy from his
neighbors, noting that presently they are able to look directly into his bedroom. Mikkelson requested the
Council approve the alternate plan.
Sansevere questioned whether the neighbors could truly see into the applicant's residence from their
decks. Sansevere suggested the applicant consider purchasing drapes for his windows.
Murphy stated it appears from the plans that if the house is moved seven feet forward, the neighbors
would be able to look inside the applicant's house easier.
Mikkelson demonstrated the line of sight from the neighbors' residences; Mikkelson stated his neighbors
sit on their decks regularly.
White stated the Council would prefer to have the deck outside ofthe 0-75' setback and that the house is
not the problem. White noted the lot is a small lot and would require lot ar~a and lot width variances in
order to construct a house.
Murphy stated he is not opposed to the seven feet and that the view from the lake would be better if the
houses were all lined up. Murphy noted the proposed deck is smaller than the other two neighbors.
McMillan inquired whether the neighbors' decks are located into the 0-75' setback somewhat.
Gaffron stated the neighbors' decksdo extend into the O.a.7 5' setback but that the objective of the
ordinances is to require everyone to build outside of the 0-75' setback when they wish to rebuild or make
improvements to their lot. Gaffron noted the DNR has a 50-foot setback and that the City attempts to
keep that wherever possible. Gaffron noted proposal one is at approximately 42 feet and that a hardship
would need to be found to encroach further into that setback. Gaffron stated in his opinion the DNR
setback is more important than the average lakeshore setback.
Murphy inquired how old the other two houses are.
A neighbor in the audienceindicated the houses are approximately 30 years old.
Gaffron stated a 75-foot.setback would not allow a buildable lot.
Sansevere inquired whether this would be precedent setting if the deck were allowed to encroach into the
0-7 5' setback. Sansevere stated he would like to be consistent with what the council has allowed in the
past.
Mikkelson stated he has a number of addresses along the lakeshore that have recently been granted more
hardcover than what he is proposing.
Sansevere stated the Council has to do what is right and be consistent.
Jurgens inquired whether there is a prowl that extends forward from the deck.
Mikkelson stated the prowl creates less hardcover.
Gaffron indicated it extends approximately four feet over the average lake shore setback line.
Jurgens stated the extension of the roofline should be taken into consideration. Jurgens stated the reason
for his dissention on the vote was that he felt the hardcover could be reduced further.
Murphy inquired whether the prowl is an extension of the roof or the house.
Gaffron stated the prowl is an extension of the house and extends approximately another four feet.
Mikkelson stated his builder told him the overhang was a foot and a half around the house.
Murphy stated the overhang would make the house look a lot closer to the lake if the home is moved
seven feet forward.
Sansevere inquired whether the neighbor has a concern with his view given the prowl.
The neighbor indicated he does not.
Gaffron statedthe plan that was approved by the Planning Commission has a 45-foot setback. Gaffron
indicated staff would prefer a plan that would be closer to the 50-foot setback.
Whitestated he does not see a hardship to grant a variance to allow the house to be moved closer to the
lake.
Murphy stated'they would like.to meet the DNR setback of 50 feet as much as possible. Murphy inquired
whether the applicant eliminated the stooped entryway in the back.
Mikkelson stated he did.
Murphy stated he would not be opposed to the covered entryway.
Mikkelson stated the house closer to the lake would allow him a better view of the lake to keep an eye on
his son.
Murphy moved, McMillan seconded, to direct staff to draft an approval resolution for Application
#06-3182, Jeff Mikkelson, 1436 Baldor Park Road, with the condition that the house not be moved
seven feet closer to the lake and with the understanding that a covered stoop would be allowed in
the back. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway
P.O.Box66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
(952) 249-4600
TO: Jeff Mikkelson
1436 Baldur Park Rd
Wayzata, MN 55391
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances & CUP
DATE OF MEETING: April 10, 2006
ZONING FILE 06-3182
NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: April 11, 2006
COPIES:
VOTE: 4 FOR 0 AGAINST
Motion: To approve per the Planning Commission recommendation with the addition of a minimal
covered entry meeting structural coverage limits.
Applicant's next scheduled meeting for final resolution approval is confirmed as:
City Council-Monday, April 24 th
-Meeting starts at 7:00 pm
If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Clerk
after review and approval by the City Council.
If you have questions please call Melanie Curtis, City Planner, at 952.249.4627.
Item Description: #06-3182, Jeff Mikkelson -1436 Baldur Park Rd -Variances
Zoning District:
Lot Area:
Lot Width:
LR-1C, Single Family Lakeshore Residential,½ acre & 100' width
0.19 acre (8,179 s.f.)
51'@ OHWL & 55'@ 75' setback
Application Summary:
The applicant is requesting lot width, lot area, and hardcover variances in order to construct a
new single family residence. The hardcover variances consist of a 0-75' hardcover variance
to allow 987 s.f. or 24.39% hardcover where 0% is normally allowed and 75'-250' hardcover
variance to allow 1,494 s.f. or 36.16% hardcover where 25% is normally allowed. A
conditional use permit is also required in order to conduct land alterations below the 931.5'
100-year floodplain elevation in conjunction with the construction of the new home.
The applicant has submitted a revised plan meeting the Planning Commission's
recommendation and has also submitted an "alternate" plan he would like to discuss. The
alternate plan shows the home shifted 7' closer to the lake in order to put the home in line
with each of the neighboring homes and the deck in line with those decks.
Planning Commission Recommendation
At their March meeting the Planning Commission voted 5 -1 to recommend approval of the
variances as requested in conjunction with the reduction of the street side deck from 74 s.f.
to 35 s.f ..
Planning Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the 1st plan consistent with the Planning ,Commission's
recommendation as the alternate plan shifts more hardcover closer to the lake.
Council should direct staff to draft a Resolution reflecting tonight's decision.
I
-"' -= ~--~ -._" -. .. : " ~ '-
"-' --
' )
1 ~ t. ... ~~~f~, . .,, BALDUR PARK ROA!
-----
----· ---
/
~/"'
I, ~
I,
~I ,~ .... ,,
~ /I
----------
'\ ' -~~, ~-~"j ,.,_ 7 ....
~ ""
Date Application Received: 02-22-06
Date Application Considered as Complete: 03-02-06
60-Day Review Period Expires: 05-02-06
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date: April 4, 2006
Item No.
Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Agenda Section:
Name: Melanie Curtis iv\ V
Title: City Planner
Item Description: #06-3182, Jeff Mikkelson-1436 Baldur Park Rd-Variances
Zoning District:
Lot Area:
Lot Width:
List of Exhibits:
Exhibit A -
Exhibit B -
Exhibit C -
Exhibit D -
LR-1 C, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, ½ acre & 100' width
0.19 acre (8,179 s.f.)
51' @OHWL & 55' @75' setback
Revised plan based on PC recommendation
Applicant's alternate plan
PC Action Notice dated 03-22-06
PC Memo & Exhibits of 03-16-06
Application Summary:
The applicant is requesting variances in order to construct a new single family residence. The
variances consist of lot area and lot width variances for a lot 0.19 acre in area and 51 '-55' in width
where 100' is normally required, and 0-75' hardcover variance to allow 987 s.f. or 24.39% hardcover
where 0% is normally allowed and 75'-250' hardcover variance to allow 1,494 s.f. or 36.16%
hardcover where 25% is normally allowed. A conditional use permit is also required in order to
conduct land alterations below the 931.5' 100-year floodplain elevation.
The applicant has submitted a revised plan at the request of the Planning Commission and has also
submitted an "alternate" plan based on discussions with the neighbor to the south. The alternate plan
shows the home shifted 7' closer to the lake in order to put the home in line with each of the
neighboring homes and the deck in line with those decks.
Planning Commission Recommendation
On March 20, 2006, Planning Commission voted 5 -1 to recommend approval of the variances as
requested provided the applicant reduce the street side deck to 35 s.f.. The dissenting Commissioner
felt that further reductions could be made.
Planning Staff Recommendation
Planning staff does not recommend that the "alternate" plan be considered as the result is a further
encroachment toward the lake. Staff recommends approval of the variances consistent with the
Planning Commission's recommendation.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Direct staff to draft a Resolution reflecting Council's decision.
,6
,.
~
\
\
,q;'\,1) ~ ~-
/g_,
----------
.. fti:6• ...
/
~f:,--C:.\~6 I
I 51 ~, t: oust .... :,,
~tt\A1'l-€/ ~ I ,.,..,
,q;'\,'\) b
JS::, ,g
,q;'\,1) q;'\,b) /o
.... 1 ~ I~
,q;'\,'\) , lz
,q;'\,b) /
I
:fJJ~,~~ t6 !).~G t ;
/ ,q1'\,1) .......__ .......... __ ,r:m:~ ,q:,'1,A)
(931.2)
c::::-----== == == ==-
~ ,.;
N c:,
~
2.0
1.5
0
~
~
--
0
N
~
'-----
~f:,--C:.\~G
.t: oust ~ tt,AAo.
,q;'\,b)
--
V) "" t;:.
"')
,q;'\,t) ~.'l)
I
I 'J.f~~\~
I t(:,f:-.~(
I
I
k,b) I ~ __/
(931."2) __ _
,q,o,b) ---\
\
lo
0 ° 44'00" W 59.85 SANITARY SEWER
M
• ••• BLACKTOP
\ ROADWAY\
'•"\, BALDUR PARK ROAD
~bl..-Ji::FF /Vf 1K1<EL50H A (' t £ P:) ,s·2/~ 616--
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEi'f "•
8
re, ('
PA1..Pv1·~ I-" AJ!!;'.I(
L,rr 61 B1.uc1< I
SETBACK ZONE: (CffiCLE ONE) {f ~:) 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000'
EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A. House
B. Garage
C. Driveway
D. Sidewalk
E. Patio/Deck
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
Or Fabric
G. Other
Length
X
X
X
-X
X
X
X
X
X
X
.. X
X
X
X
X
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A ---'---+ B
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE.
A. House ______ x
B. Garage
C. Driveway
D. Sidewalk
E. Patio/Deck
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
Or Fabric
G. Other
Length
X
X
X
X
X
-X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A _____ + B
Widtl1
X 100 =
Width
=
=
=
\\.
X 100 =
S.F. ------
---'-----S.F. ______ S.F.
S.F. ------
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
S.F. ------_____ S.F.""
S.F. ------______ S.F.
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
______ S.F. A
______ S.F. B·
______ %
--,----"7-=S __ 3 __ S.F.
S.F. ------______ S.F.
S.F. ------
______ S.F.
S.F. ------. S.F':·-------
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
--'7..=3"-4-_.__ __ S.F.
S.F. ~-----
S.F. ------
------S.F.
S.F. ------
______ S.F.
qg7
404-7
"24-. ~9
S.F .... A --,,--'--"',-~--
S. F. B ---'------% ___ ..__ __
J IS FF /VI I KKE: LSO N o-'' -,.eQ. ( tuatf it) J-Jt,~1)6'
t'Ml..OtJR r' ARI('..
loT 61 e l..<k:,k!.. /
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' ~ 250-500'
EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A. House
B. Garage
C. Driveway
D. Sidewalk
E. Patio/Deck
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
Or Fabric
G. Other
Length
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A ---'----+ B
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE'
A. House ______ x
B. Garage
C. Driveway
D. Sidewalk
E. Patio/Deck
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Pla~tic
Or Fabric
G. Other
Length
X
X
X
X
X
-X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN.ZONE .
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A _____ + B
Widtl1
=
=
_____ xlOO =
Width
=
=
=
_____ xlOO =
500-1000'
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
s.F:·
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F. A
S.F. B'
%
_--:.7_4:.....::2..~_S.F.
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
S.F. ------
S.F. ------
--=5 ....... 8'"""6~-S.F.
S.F-:·· ------
_ __,l='.3L,6 __ S.F.
______ S.F.
S.F. --~---S.F. ------
S.F. ------______ S.F.
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
f4'l4-S.F. · A --~-----'4_,_13:,._,Z,.... . ..___ S.F. B
-~5._...b'-%.. ... .:...1'=6 ___ %
---
.... 1
.,_r, b'!C:::-======
~;>"" \
\
0
rt')
I
l93*.oJ
I ~ I N
~1 ....
~ I
I
/
I
/
/
/
/
(931.2)--
0° 44'00" w 59.85 SANIT
• •.•• BLACKTOP
' ROAOWAY\ ...... \ BALDUR PARK RO
l:SAt..PVt<: FA;e1.:: r.a~ . JfFF /vf IK1<EL50N 'ff I Cl 1-::,,i, t..Yl n..,,w---n_ Z, 2.c & 6
~/WI U'J'I/I f'7 3-30-06
LoT 61 Bt.ot:1..: I
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) <if:~~ 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000'
EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A House
B. Garage
C. Driveway
D. Sidewalk
E. Patio/Deck
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
Or Fabric
G. Other
Length
' ~ \:
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
.. X
X
X
X
X
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOT AL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A _____ B
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE.
A. House ______ x
B. Garage
C. Driveway
D. Sidewalk
E. Patio/Deck
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
Or Fabric
G. Other
Length
X
X
X
X
X
.. X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN.ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A ______ B
Width
_____ xlOO =
Width
X 100 =
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
S.F. ------S.F. ------
S.F. ------
S.F. ------
S.F. ------
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
s.F.· ------
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
S.F. ------
S.F. ------
S.F. A ------
S.F. B ------
% ------
qzB s.F. --~~--
S.F. ------______ S.F.
S.F. ------
S.F. ------
S.F. ------
------S.F: ··
-~z3 ___ S.F.
S.F. ------
-~-Z..=3~4:~_S.F.
S.F. ------
S.F. ------S.F. ------
S.F. ------
S.F. ------
-~l _( ~lo/_-s-___ S.F. A _4_oq._7 __ s.F. B
_ _.:.l_,<lc:..., 1."--S"'"-__ %
i 22 06 t;tH .. OllR \.; ARI<
lvT 61 1?> l.0<:K I
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' ~ 250-500'
EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE
500-1000'
A House
B. Garage
C. Driveway
D. Sidewalk
E. Patio/Deck
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
Or Fabric
G. Other
Length
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
.. X
X
X
X
X
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A _____ B
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE.
A. House ______ x
B. Garage
C. Driveway
D. Sidewalk
E. Patio/Deck
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
Or Fabric
G. Other
Length
X
X
X
X
X
.. X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A _____ B
Width
=
X 100
Width
X 100
S.F. ------
S.F. -~----
S.F. ------
S.F. ------
S.F. ------
S.F. ------
S.F. ------
______ S.F.
S.F. ------
______ S.F.
______ S.F.·
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
S.F. ------
S.F. ------
______ S.F. A
______ S.F. B
% ------
$68 S.F. ---,--~"----
S.F. ------
S.F. ------
S.F. ------
S.F. ------
-~7-3~3 __ S.F.
S.F:·· ------
-~/~7~/ __ S.F.
S.F. ------
S.F. ------S.F. ------
S.F. ------
S.F. ------S.F. ------
S.F. ------
\472.._ S.F. ···A --~---__ 4_13_l,_ __ S.F. B
_ _,3;...._;S-_;;_~ ,.._6 =7...,__ __ %
CITY OF ORONO ZONING FILE 06-3182
2750 Kelley Parkway
PO Box 66 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
952.249.4600 DATE OF NOTICE: March 22, 2006
TO: JeffMikkelson COPIES:
1436 Baldur Park Rd
Wayzata, MN 55391
TYPE OF REQUEST: Variances
DATE OF MEETING: March 22, 2006
Planning Commission recommended as follows:
To approve the lot area, lot width, lake setback and hardcover variances as requested with
the exception of the road-side deck-which must be reduced to 35 s.f ..
VOTE: 5 FOR 1 AGAINST
* The dissenting Commissioner felt that further hardcover reductions were warranted.
Applicant should provide a revised survey and revised (final) plans to Melanie Curtis by
April 3rd in order to remain on the April 10t\ City Council agenda.
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as:
City Council -April 10 th -Meeting starts at 7:00 pm
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are
available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission.
If you have questions, please cal} City Planner, Melanie Curtis at 952.249.4627.
Date Application Received: 02-22-06
Date Application Considered as Complete: 03-02-06
60-Day Review Period Expires: 05-02-06
To: Chair Rahn and Planning Commission Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
From: Melanie Curtis, City Planner
Date: March 16, 2006
Subject: 06-3182, Jeff Mikkelson, 1436 Baldur Park Rd
• Lot Width, Lot Area, Hardcover, and Lake Setback Variances
• CUP Land Alteration within the 100-year flood plain
• Public Hearing
FILE#06-3182
16 March 2006
Page 1 of 5
Zoning District:
Lot Area:
LR-lC, Single Family Lakeshore Residential,½ acre minimum
0.19 acre (8,179 s.f.)
Application Summary: The applicants are requesting variances in order to construct a
new single family residence. The variances consist of lot area and lot width variances for
a lot 0.19 acre in area and 51'-55' in width where 100' is normally required, and 0-75'
hardcover variance to allow 987 s.f. or 24% hardcover where 0% is normally allowed and
75'-250' hardcover variance to allow 1,518 s.f. or 36.7% hardcover where 25% is
normally allowed. A conditional use permit in order to conduct land alterations below
the 931.5' 100-year floodplain elevation is also required.
Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends approval of the lot width, lot area,
lake setback and some level of hardcover variances in conjunction with the
redevelopment of this property. The applicant must receive approvals from the MCWD
for the work below the 931. 5' elevation. Planning staff also recommends approval of the
conditional use permit for grading and fill within the floodplain incorporating the
recommendations of the MCWD and the City Engineer. Finally, the applicant will be
required to submit an as-built grading plan prior to issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy.
Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Sections
Sec. 78-350. Area, height, lot width and yard requirements.
(a) Height. No structure or building in the LR-IC district shall exceed 2 1/2
stories and shall not exceed 30 feet in height except as provided in section 78-1366.
(b) Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be observed:
Lot Area (acre) Lot Width (feet) Front Yard Side Yard (feet) Rear Yard (feet) Side Yard Adjacent
(feet) to Street (feet)
0.5 100 30 10 30 15
1
FILE#06-3182
16 March 2006
Page 2 of 5
Sec. 78-1116. Conditional uses.
5. Placement of fill or construction of fences.
Sec. 78-1117. Standards for floodway conditional uses.
(a) All uses. No structure (temporary or permanent), fill (including fill for
roads and levees), deposit, obstruction, storage of materials or equipment, or other uses
may be allowed as a conditional use that will cause any increase in the stage of the 100-
year or regional flood or cause an increase in flood damages in the reach or reaches
affected.
Sec. 78-1288. Hard cover limitations.
(a) No hard cover or impervious surface shall be placed, located or constructed within 75
feet of the ordinary high water level of any lake or tributary, except for stairways, lifts,
landings and lockboxes as regulated elsewhere in this Code.
(b) Between 75 feet and 250 feet of the OHWL, there shall be no greater than 25 percent
hard cover. Between 250 feet and 500 feet of the OHWL there shall be no greater than 30
percent hardcover. Between 500 feet and 1,000 feet of the OHWL there shall be no
greater than 35 percent hardcover.
Sec. 78-1403. Lot coverage.
In all zoning districts, for all lots of 0--1.99 acres in total area, the total combined
footprint areas of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 15 percent of the
lot area. Exception: Regardless of lot area, every developed lot shall be allowed at least
1,500 square feet of lot coverage by principal residence and garage structures.
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A -Application
Exhibit B -Hardship Documentation Form
Exhibit C -Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan
Exhibit D -Proposed Plans and Elevations
Exhibit E -Submitted Hardcover Calculations
Exhibit F -Letters from City Engineer
Exhibit G -Floodplain Mitigation Calculations
Exhibit H -Aerial Photo
Exhibit I -Property Owners List
Exhibit J -Plat Map
Background
The applicant is requesting lot area, lot width and 0-75' and 75'-250' hardcover variances
in order to construct a new single family residence on his property. The lot is
substandard in width and area and the application of the 7 5' lake setback allows for only
about 40' of buildable area depth. The applicant is proposing a 1,495 s.f. home and
minimal hardcover to support the home. The application includes lot area, lot width, and
lake yard setback as well as hardcover variances. Additionally, a conditional use permit
to conduct land alterations within the 100-year flood elevation (931.5') is requested.
2
LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET
Lot Area/Width:
LR-lC Lot Area
Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acre)
Lot Width
100'
51' (at the OHWL)
FILE#06-3182
16 March 2006
Page 3 of 5
Actual 8,179 s.f. (0.19 acre) 55'at the 75' setback
Setbacks:
LR-lC Required Proposed
Front/Lakeshore 75' 42'
Rear 30' 35.1'
West Side 10' 10.6'
East Side 10' 10.7'
Average Lakeshore The proposed new home will be located behind the average lakeshore
setback.
St t l C rue ura overaee:
Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage
8,179 s.f. (0.19 acre) Allowed*: 1,500 s.f. (18.3%)
Proposed: 1,495 s.f. (18.2%)
* Per Section 78-1403, lots under 10,000 s.f in area are permitted 1,500 s.f of structural
coverage including principal structure and garage.
Hardcover Calculations:
Hardcover Zone Total Area in Allowed Proposed
Zone Hardcover Hardcover
0-75 4,047 s.f. 0 s.f 987 s.f.
(0%) (24.39%)
75 -250 4,132 s.f. 1,033 s.f. 1,518 s.f.
(25%) (36.74%)
* After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds
Flood Fringe District
The applicant has requested a conditional use permit in order to conduct land alterations
within the floodplain, consisting of fill in areas below the 931.5' elevation to allow for
driveway and a conrer of the garage. The filling in the floodplain will be mitigated by
lowering the grade adjacent to the house and driveway to compensate for the equivalent
loss of flood storage volume due to fill.
Conditional Use Permit Review
Application of Section 78-1117 (Standards for floodway and flood fringe conditional
uses) to this request.
78-1117(a): All uses. No structure (temporary or permanent), fill, deposit, obstruction,
3
FILE#06-3182
16 March 2006
Page 4 of 5
storage of materials, equipment, or other use may be allowed as conditional uses which,
acting alone or in combination with existing or reasonably anticipated future uses,
adversely affect the capacity of the floodway or increases flood heights.
1. No fill shall be deposited in the floodway, and any fill deposited in the flood
fringe shall be no more than the minimal amount necessary to conduct a
conditional use. Generally, fill shall be limited to that needed to grade or
landscape for that use and shall not in any way further obstruct the flow of
floodwaters.
a. The fill proposed for this application is the minimum amount necessary to
accommodate a reasonable driveway access to serve the property.
2. Spoil from dredging shall not be deposited in the floodway nor in the flood fringe.
a. Not applicable.
3. All fill shall be protected from erosion by vegetative cover in the form of grass,
natural ground covers, shrubs and trees as determined by the council.
a. A landscape plan should be submitted by the applicant ..
4. All filling and grading activities shall be performed with only clean fill.
a. This requirement will be monitored by the City Engineer.
Lot Area & Lot Width Variance
The applicants' property is a lot of record and is non-conforming with respect to lot area
and lot width. The property is 50' wide and has 8,179 s.f. in area where 100' in width and
21,780 s.f. in area are required within the LR-IC zoning district. Variances are required
to rebuild any home on this property.
Hardcover Variance
Due to the small size of this lot the 15% structural coverage allowed is less than 1,500
s.f., and the applicants are permitted by City Code 15% lot coverage by structures or
1,500 s.f. whichever is greater. The applicant is permitted a 1,500 s.f. footprint. There is
a limited buildable area within the 75'-250' zone, therefore the applicants have proposed
to construct their home partially within the 0-75' zone, but meeting the average lakeshore
setback. However, due to the size of the lot and the area within the 0-75' and 75' -250'
zones, the home footprint and patio account for 24.39% hardcover within the 0-75' zone.
The house and small deck consist of 19.7% hardcover within the 75' -250' zone, and
adding driveway and sidewalk results in a total of 36. 74% within the 75' -250' zone.
The property owner mentioned some landscaping is proposed which will help alleviate
some of the effects of the additional hardcover on the property, and should be asked for
details of those landscaping elements. As Baldur Park is a neighborhood of small, flat lots
the applicant's request does not seem to be out of line for this neighborhood.
Hardship Statement
Applicants have completed the Hardship Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and
4
should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application.
Hardship Analysis
FILE#06-3182
16 March 2006
Page 5 of 5
In considering applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the
proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in
the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances
from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause
undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and
shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the
spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code.
Staff finds that with respect to the lot area and lot width variance requests as the area and
width are significantly substandard there are hardships inherent to the land to justify
granting these variances. Similarly with the lake setback and hardcover variance
requests, there is not a reasonable buildable area in which to build a home with a
conforming hardcover level and lake setback. However, the applicant has proposed two
decks (one street-side and one larger one on the lake side) which account for a total of
308 s.f. of hardcover on the property. While staff does not necessarily feel that a deck is
an inappropriate request, there may be justification to scale down or reduce the lakeside
deck as proposed. Additionally, the City Engineer has reviewed the floodplain mitigation
plan and has deemed it acceptable. Staff supports the conditional use permit for land
alterations within the floodplain. As land alterations are proposed within the floodplain,
the applicant must seek the necessary approvals from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District.
Issues for Consideration
Are there any other issues or concerns with this application?
Staff Recommendation
Planning Staff recommends approval of the lot width, lot area, lake setback and some
level of hardcover variances in conjunction with the redevelopment of this property. The
applicant must receive approvals from the MCWD for the work below the 931.5'
elevation. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit for grading and fill
within the floodplain incorporating the recommendations of the MCWD and the City
Engineer.
5
City of Orono
Variance Application
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono , MN 55356
Main: 952-249-4600
fax: 952-249-4616
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
Application# Q (o-,3 l, t° ,;:l
Date Received: c9-/2 2 / o 0
Amount Paid: lJ!.00 (JD '
Staff : '\'tyJ -<.LM.I..U
Fee: _$~6_00 ______ _
Renewal: $250 _.:::__:::c::..::....::...--,---:-,--::,--------
After -the-fact: $1,200 Double Fee
This application form must be completed in full. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the
appl ication. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas.
Site Address: [LI~ t a.id i:.J: &--"a ds Kd ... 1 Oro,10, /½(I) S.53 9/ PROPERTY INFORIVIATION: ~ /1 n
Property ldentificati b n Number (Pi): 7 7
(Attach legal description to application if .99/i.~ded on the survey.)
Date Property Acquired (month/year): -// o □ Yes, I own the adjacent parcels.
Present use of property: p( Residential Other ________________ _
Zoning District:
Email: ----=j ~c=" ~'"-+-f ~-~/Y}~~/l~,l~{~d=J~.,"~'2~~~f~·l>1~"=''-~ /4.~~l:?'.l~--
.,,-:;>'/ u Nu:, (.,_--,c~ •
0 (o l\a Zip: SS3'-'7/ -~~~---
OWNER INFORMATION: (Complete legal names and marital status required for each interested party)
Name: ::lef f. /J1 //{!te /'r:,,.,. , (}o f IY1o-,-r ,ed
Phone (home): 6,/J '.;:_..,-j -?, ">-JC( Phone (wor~): -~=--1:1=--· ?1'.::'<'--'--'..___ ______ ---:-=c--=c=-
Address: . L I/ ~~" ha Jdu r ei:J<-fi ct _ City: 0 ( 0 /\ 0 Zip: .5 5 3 CJ I
Email: vc."' ~r:-_,1,dkl·<.dSd-d J..ofrno//-t b m Fax:
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Estimated Project Cost: $ ___ _
Describe the request in detail (attach additional sheets if necessary):
lea-c J-,w(\ e Yt ~sfJ?J_ 1o/YV /)"''\ br1:Jd N.ld ,'.J 2f~>v 1,,J /Jh..
/P~-~:;) ~)
(j) ;;';) \
'
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS:
All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your
application to be processed .
Pre-Application Meeting Form, completed by a City Planner.
Completed Application Form
Completed Hardship Documentation Form
Certified Property Owners List -owners within~f the subject property , labels and plat map .
List, labels and map may be obtained fro~nnepin County Department of Finance,
Government Center, A-603 300 South 6th Street, Minneapolis, telephone 612-348-5910
Original Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor), meeting all the requirements
listed within this packet, including hardcover calculations. Also provide one copy 8.5'' x 11" or
11" x 17" for reproduction.
Completed hardcover calculation worksheets (as provided within the variance packet).
Topographic survey -including existing and proposed elevations. Provide one copy 8 .5" x 11"
or 11" x 17" for reproduction.
Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views (provide one copy 8.5'' x 11" or 11" x 17").
Additional items may be requested by City Staff depending on the scope of the project. *
APPLICANT'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Planning
Department, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or
consultant expenses incurred in review of this application and certifies that the information supplied is
true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that he/she is solely
responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the
staff has no alternative 7:ut t rej_ef.i it until it i~l omplete or to recommend the request for
denial of the request regard ss o!ft ts potenti
1
al '-11i r:t! /
1
L
Applicant'sSignature:
0
It/, ilJ~ Date ;}_; /7/dt}o~
Applicant's Signature: L/ ' Date:
(.,.
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices by the application deadline. Planning
Commission Meetings are normally held on the third Monday of each month . Applicants must be
present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an
applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized
representative attend in place of the applicant and advise the City Planner assigned to your project.
U0 :1 ~-;~--·:-·
T ··,';',
,',f ). '.) --~..,./
·' ,, ... r·~~.
1 •• -. ~
•, •• I .·',>' 1 ,,
I
I
~
DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY
In accordance with M.S. 13.04, Subd . 2, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you
that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may
require you to furnish certain private or confidential information .
You are notified that:
1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or
license requested.
2 . You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or
license.
3 . The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent
necessary to process the permit or license.
4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information
may become public.
5 . You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 (see following page) to review private data on
yourself.
6.
_Ad_d_es_so_~(o~M~--------r"----->-~---3_9_/ __ ~-✓~d-~-~-0)5 19
City j / Zip Phone
I understand y rights
{/
c;'t1
) _}
e::. ~
Page 1 of 3
HARDSHIP DOCUMENTATION FORM
This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application
will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is
complete and submitted to the City.
Minnesota State Statutes Section 394.27, Subdivision 7 requires that a hardship be
demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The hardship must be unique to the
property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic
situations are not considered valid hardships. In order for an application to be heard by
the Planning Commission and City Council a hardship having merit must be
demonstrated.
HOW DO I PROVE A HARDSHIP?
This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if a hardship
exists and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove a hardship,
address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible.
Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the
variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a
denial or approval recommendation . If you leave something out it will not be considered.
Please address each of these hardship criteria as they relate to the request (some may
not apply):
1.
2.
3.
4.
"The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under
con lions allowed b the official controls ."
fo ' of {/,
"The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not
created by the landowner." 9;, ~ f-k ld~/-:z-e ~ .kf;<'~± s .. f:111\iMuM hO/'k ~~ < IRI\ S k e U~ bj/iC,c/~L ~
"Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if
rea?!able use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter."
{l..:S{?c:; >_?(\d ~1 u~ is : rm Pl.!1vi ~11 W > n + k
) I
Page 2 of 3
5 . "Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct
sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered
construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in
harmony_ tfth this Chapter."
6. "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a
variance any use that is not permitted under this Chapter for property in the zone
where the affected person's land is located."
/V/A
7. "The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a
one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." NI&_
8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar
to such property or immediately adjoining property."
9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in
which said land is,loc ted."
IJ-1 ., , k c ' ?l ~ 0-r-l ~;
T "
10 . "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
of a substantial property right of the applicant."
7 k ex:, f i' 1) ho me 1
1
:'.S otlu %~-:;-Ve'"' s . :2 IJ. ..
'T~ b:111:ie \ bus 1tYkJU -12roblems 1fbrtf Lt-:{e
the /,Acy (&d:10, t;,:>C t(Yly 9 ;r: 0 /d I U(-1!'f S[o1Y14<-k ~wv tylp ( f\J~,
11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety,
comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning
Co e."
m er . .:.: .... ;
(:1
,:.'.-)
(-. \_..,,
1: ... -.:...:..~
J ~·-
Page 3 of 3
12 .
Hardship Statement
Should you feel the hardship cannot fully be described in the above criteria, describe the
unique hardship, practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance
with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional sheets if
necessary):
Cf~~-~
c l r.,l
)~
~:,~
ro•·c'·J :t
' . 6;:_~/
'j
!
(931.1)
(931,7)
EX\51\NG
HOUSE
#1432
(931,3)
-1t0'----
(930.9)
(931,3)
I--
I •
, _______ _
;•
J '
\.,
' '
)f-l
I
."·lr L\ .
~ :
"'
ill
I
L ---__ !
-····---------------~;.,:~·-~"'-"---1
__ ~-2_:_:_·_, ~•-.. ·~r 3_:,_T•4· _"._·•·
1,'c, I
!
'
1111~
, ..
1jl ii'
r I-""
111 '---' '" 1., " 111 () I"' ..I
111 -------. I.) I.
1!1 "" ) I"¾, .,P'
Iii,_.,....·
i1I ~L-5R4L \
111 ElATH '. I
/:ii i -
_L,iu I i,,....;_\-Ob -,~;
s
"' ;-
7
_,.,,/
DINI NG i'0o M
---!
0 011
OQ
K ITCHEN
i)I =====bl========:=
111
Ill
~-----~ Ill
ljl
!II
111
Ill
111
Ill
111
Ill
1j1
Iii
ljl
1:1
I
Gfi<EAT ROOM
.., -< 111 ----.......__ ··,::---::--...o I,! ---~7-:~-;L··
C &· ! ;•-~-"" S '-4" 10·-~" I ,,V, : ---~~~ /L------~~----~1
------·---------------==------------------/
_.:..:_ __
• '1
·~;:,..,
~· ;,
F IRST FL c
U . ..!, 7 CO,, T~..!,,:;T:::;-~
;=::,,;;..: 'f'RE -FCR-
,::. Llt--D --CEC ..:.R
CF ,...,~M IC ;FIEI-:: ,
MOi5:;-t,.R,E 7,-;_T
MC,;i-1 ... ~ RE.!...-
-1'. '-=.EC E55E~ -:: ..... ;-..
C -Ti-EC,Fc .:.~ ,:;::::_
i ..... E ~car s -'-=··
O IRE.CTL ""r. 1/>t iC
UM ::N p __ :,6 .:.1
FORF~Fi::<C
ci:,·
·.r-:,_ .... _
-1 ----·-I
l
oFF-.c..e/
l.Of°<"'
~-·~=--==--=-"~ r---..• I
·--~-·
I
I
I
I
CFEN TC e::Lc..:J
la.>'-O'•
-ls .,,
~I
~
'f
tl.
i
I
' i
I
I
__ ]~
··-~j
.. } .v
\,
\
\~,'·
\ ... -,
\"'
-.\ \\
'
; ,,.
I-
<{ > w
_J
w
~
---~----· ---
'1." --JJ1=,-•·· L .. ~,l __ l
c~---~,~-hr." _.:_J
'
LI
_____ · f._ ____ · ..
F~
·~; ... ~ .i
., . ., ~-. . •.
'I
C
/f;:-'~ f.< ~ :-..
-~·
I I;
I
j
~
[j
I ,,
t: I ./I
r.1 1ld~1
,,,.-.. :"i:'"-.:::-.-
{~ ' ., ;
(· ; _,...,.:.. .. • l
_,,_ ....
::'.... :,
~\..:-. .-'J
e5
1-<t > w
_j
w
Ol <t
~
1 ·· --
i
I --__ ...._ _______ _
PP.OPRIBT!-R
z
()
t-
1 w
_J
w
UJ -,
" J,
LU
" -' Ll
ill
PRfM: UETA Y
~·· -:} _ _L _____ _
T7!T ·
I 1
I '
I I
I:\ -' ~-.. \
(..:.".: ·' -.'.~ .!
·:-,,::--..: .. _. __ .. ,r:,.,
: 1 -~--~-.. ---••;: ... •'"
z
Ci
1-
-<[
> LU
_J
IJJ
1-
/., l -,-,--,----·---,----,rr-rr.-:-n;
l:'': I ,,
: I::':' I'' I i' • I, I,;! t ! t • I, · ; . ,:i ',.,
1,
; : ,;!
i I
1 j, !'.
i. i I : i l i,
: I· '' 'I ' I • · I I i : I; 1'
I I'. j. ! ;t 'i I•: 7
c5
t-
-<.[
> LU
__J
ill
fr'.
-({
lt!
I II ::-ITT I 1L ' ~ JI
I
I
I[]
I
i,
fi: I I 1.i · I 1 i:. I f
11 · • I
l
1l · I j
' 'i ' i /; :
l! l i \j ' ,, .;
!
1.
i \
, ;, l i
~
t-
~
ill
_J
w
t-u.. w
_J
j £"FF /vf I K1<EL5 0 N
Z-zz-ac
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
BAt-PVI'< PA,e1<
Lo-r 61 81..0~1-< I
SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) <Q)j~ 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000'
EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A House
B. Garage
C. Driveway
D. Sidewalk
E. Patio/Deck
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
Or Fabric
G. Other
Length
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOT AL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A ______ + B
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE.
A House
Length
B. Garage
C. Driveway
D. Sidewalk
E. Patio/Deck
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
Or Fabric
G. Other
X
X
X
X
X
X
.. X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN.ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A ______ + B
WidtJ1
_____ X 100
Width
_____ xJOO,
S.F. ------
S.F. ------
S.F. ------
S.F. ------
S.F. ------
S.F. ------______ S.F.
S.F. ------______ S.F.
S.F. ------S.F.' ------
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
S.F. ------
S.F. ------
S.F. A ------S.F. B ------______ %
753 S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
Z34-S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
4047 S.F.
%
A
B
8At.OIJR P ARfL
Lor 6, B L.;Jc:;J, /
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' ~ 250-500'
EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE
500-1000'
A. House
B. Garage
C. Driveway
D. Sidewalk
E. Patio/Deck
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
Or Fabric
G. Other
Length
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-x
X
X
X
X
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A ______ B
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE.
A. House ______ x
B. Garage
C. Driveway
D. Sidewalk
E. Patio/Deck
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
Or Fabric
G. Other
Length
X
X
X
X
X
-x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN.ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A _____ B
Widtl1
_____ xlOO =
Width
7
_____ xlOO =
S.F. ------
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
S.F. ------______ S.F.
______ S.F.
______ s.F.-
s.F. ------S.F. ------S.F. ------
S.F. ------
S.F. A ------S.F. B ------______ %
742.. S.F. -~-~--
S.F. ------
------S.F. ______ S.F.
______ S.F.
-~s-B-6 __ s.F.
S.F-: ------
---"-t J'""'b,___ __ S.F.
S.F. ------
__ -.._14_,__ __ S.F.-fJft:fl
S.F. ------
S.F. ------S.F. ------______ S.F.
S.F. ------
l S 18 S.F. -A -----,,-''---''-------'4....:...13=.,l_ _____ S.F. B
-~s..,.6'-'-, i_,_4:__._ __ %
•fl• Bonestroo . e Rosene_
"11 Anderlik &
1 \J 1 Associates
Engineers & Architects
March 9, 2006
Ms. Melanie Curtis
Planner
City of Orono
Post Office Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
B35 West Highway 36 • St. Paul , MN 55113
I
. Office: 651-636-4600 • Fa x: 651-636-1311
www.bonestroo.com
Re: 1436 Baldur Park Road
File No. 000139-06000-1
Plat No. 06-3182
Dear Melanie: .
We have rev~ewed the survey for the proposed home construction at 1436 Baldur ];>ark Road. The
survey does not provide enough information for us to complete our review, In order to complete
our review a revised survey that includes the following items should be resubmitted:
• The lot is so flat that the survey needs to show contours every 0.5 feet.
• The revised survey should clearly show the contour of the flood plain elevation (931.5).
• The plans should quantify any flood plain filling and any required flood plain mitigation.
• A proposed grading plan should be provided.
If you have any questions, please call me at ( 651) 604-4863.
Yours very truly,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC .
St . Paul, St . Cloud, Rochester, MN • Milwaukee, WI • Chicago, IL
Affirmative Actiol]/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned
j fl j Bonestroo IJ Rosene
"'1\111 Anderlik &
1 \j 1 Associates
Engineers & Architects
March 15, 2006
Ms. Melanie Curtis
Planner
City of Orono
Post Office Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55Jl3
I
. Office: 651-636 -4600 • Fa x : 651-636-J3Jl
www.bonestroo .com
Re: 1436 Baldur Park Road
-File No . 000139-06000-1
· PlatNo.06-3182
Dear Melanie :
We have reviewed the revised survey dated 3-1;3-06 for the proposed home construction at 1436
Baldur Park Road. We have the following comments with regards to engineering matters:
• The revised contours and associated flood plain calculations appear to be acceptable.
• The final grading plan should show spot elevations along the side yards to verify drainage
will be directed towards the lake or the street within the property boundaries.
• Final plans should include erosion and sediment control details.
If you have any questions, please call me at (651) 604-4863.
Yours very truly,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES,.INC .
-!o-M
Tom Kellogg
St . Paul , St . Cloud, Rochester, MN • Mil w aukee, WI • Chicago, IL
Affirmative Action/Equa l Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned
FLOODPLAIN CUT/FILL CALCULATIONS
FOR JEFF MIKKELSON
MARCH 13, 2006
1. Fill below 931.5 floodplain for drive
Depth (ft) Area (S.F.)
0 1000
0.5 240
>
Iner. vol (C.F.)
310 = 11.5 C.Y.
2. Cut to create new floodplain west of drive
Depth (ft) Area (S.F.) Iner. vol (C.F.)
0 1060
> 310 =11.5C.Y.
0.5 180
GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES. INC.
445 N. WILLOW DR.
LONG LAKE, MN 55356
,
--··--
I
I
"'I ~ :-,"-' . ~ ~ I
/
/
/
/
'---------®1.0,
----~-b~ ,91'\,'=>► .
'-------
Exhibit H
1436 Baldur Park Rd
Overview Map
t\
N
./"' __ _
RUN DATE: 2/21/2006
38 0811723340013
PROP ADDR 1424 BALDUR PARK RD
OWNER NAME R J ROHRER ET AL
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
R 1 ROHRER/D LS HUTCHINSON
1424 BALDUR PARK RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 0811723340028
PROP ADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
OWNER NAME REGINALD A SPINDLER
TAXPAYER RA SPINDLER
NAME/ADDR SPRING FARM
8402 BURROUGHS RD W
DEER PARK WA 99006
38 0811723430002
PROP ADDR 3490 BIRCH LA
OWNER NAME GEORGE W STICKNEY ET AL
TAXPAYER GEORGE W STICKNEY
NAME/ADDR JUDITH E OLIVERIUS
3490 BIRCH LA
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 0811723430005
PROP ADDR 1440 BALDUR PARK RD
OWNER NAME J P BOHN & S D BOHN
TAXPAYER JOHN&SUZANNEBOHN
NAME/ADDR 6377 OXBOW BEND
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
38 0811723430008
PROP ADDR 3510 NORTH SHORE DR
OWNER NAME M A LA TTERNER/K M LA TTERNER
TAXPAYER MICHAEL & KIMBERLY LA TTERNER
NAME/ADDR 3510 NORTH SHORE DR
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 0811723430011
PROP ADDR 3540 NORTH SHORE DR
OWNER NAME D M PETTIPIECE ET AL W/L EST
TAXPAYER DOLORES M PETTIPIECE
NAME/ADDR 3540 NORTHSHORE DR
WAYZATAMN 55391
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 0811723340014
PROP ADDR 1420 BALDUR PARK RD
OWNER NAME BRADLEY J MCDONNELL ET AL
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
BRADLEY & CYNTHIA MCDONNELL
1420 BALDUR PARK RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 0811723340059
PROP ADDR 1428 BALDURPARKRD
OWNER NAME THE HELi ROTH TRUST
TAXPAYER KENT & LORI ROTH
NAME/ADDR 1428 BALDUR PARK RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 0811723430003
PROP ADDR 1448 BALDUR PARK RD
OWNER NAME J H & M R LA WREN CE
TAXPAYER JAY H & MARUS R LA WREN CE
NAME/ ADDR 1448 BALDUR PARK RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 0811723430006
PROP ADDR 1436 BALDURPARKRD
OWNER NAME JEFFREY PAUL MIKKELSON
TAXPAYER JEFFREY PAUL MIKKELSON
NAME/ADDR 1436 BALDUR PARK RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 0811723430009
PROP ADDR 3520 NORTH SHORE DR
OWNER NAME R E SWENSON & V L SWENSON
TAXPAYER ROBERTE& VALERIELSWENSON
NAME/ADDR 3520 NORTH SHORE DR
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 0811723340025
PROP ADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
OWNER NAME REGINALD A SPINDLER
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
RA SPINDLER
SPRING FARM
8402 BURROUGHS RD W
DEERPARK WA 99006
38 0811723430001
PROP ADDR 3470 BIRCH LA
OWNER NAME T W BERNARD & L K BERNARD
TAXPAYER THOMAS W BERNARD
NAME/ADDR 3470 BIRCH LA
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 0811723430004
PROP ADDR 1444 BALDURPARKRD
OWNER NAME P J KA VENEY & LL KA VENEY
TAXPAYER P J KA VENEY & LL KA VENEY
NAME/ADDR 1444 BALDUR PARK RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 0811723430007
PROP ADDR 1432 BALDUR PARK RD
OWNER NAME J G & M R NYQUIST
TAXPAYER JOHN G & MAUREEN R NYQUIST
NAME/ADDR 1432 BALDUR PARK RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 0811723430010
PROP ADDR 3530 NORTH SHORE DR
OWNER NAME ALBERT J ACKERMANN
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
A J ACKERMANN
3530 NORTH SHORE DR
WAYZATAMN 55391
PAGE: 1
RUN DATE: 2/21 /2006 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND
TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAXPAYER SERVICES DEPAR~ THE BE ,. A
OF MY KNOWLEOOE AND BELIEF. Z? /:2 I /41_
DATE ~ BY
..c:J
PAGE: 2
4
(34)
Hennepin County
Taxpayer Services Department
I 08-117-23-43-I
~-@ ~.
L.
Parcel Information
Parcel ID 0811723430006
House Number 1436
Street Name BALDUR PARK RD
This is not a legally recorded map. It represents a compilation of information
and data from City, County, and State road authorities and other sources.
('~':;
. :: :~:
•· ·•.; .. ··'.'\
OE.SIGNED REVISION
DRAWN
ECD
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR
JEFFREY P. MIKKELSON
OF LOT 6, BLOCK 1, BALDUR PARK
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
---------'-----'-------
LAKE MINNETONKA
NORTH ARM
(931.1)
\
{931,7)' (9)1,7)
j (931,1)
-<R>
{931.JJ
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES
Lot 6, Block 1, BALDUR PARK
o : denotes iron marker
(930.◄) --
(908.3): denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum
[[I[ID : denotes proposed spot elevation, mean sea level datum
---917--·: denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum
~: denotes proposed contour line, mean sea level datum
Bearings shown are based upon 1;:m assumed datum.
This survey shows the boundaries of the above described property,
the location of a proposed house thereon. It does not purport to
show any other improvements or encroachments.
(931.◄)
(9)1,6)
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
1) Garage = ~
2) Lowest floor = 1933.21
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was
prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that
I am a duly !lcensed professfonal englnner and land
surveyor under the laws of the State or Minnesota E:: ::~=:~::::;~;.::::~=~:~ $ ~~~oN!ti~~t7~c.
1-
~-==--=:::--l~~= ...:,_~·»_~"-~:::-1,_~'-~"-~'"'_~'-~'"-~'"-~"-~MO-~VE-~o-~ue_~"-~"-~"rr_~,_~"-~"•_~,_~"-~'"_~'"_•=•_="_="'_'='_=u,_=,_==--==--==-_=j --l CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND "'"'" SURVEYORS, AND SITE PLANNERS
MSG 1---1----+-------------------l NORTH W!LL~~z~~73:_~~~1LAKE, MN 55356 Marks Gronberg MN Uc No 12755Date
06-663
SCALE
1"~20'
DESIGNED
DRAWN
ECD
~,~
1l}-0
REVISION
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR
JEFFREY P. MIKKELSON
OF LOT 6, BLOCK 1, BALDUR PARK
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
EXISTING
HOUSE
#1428
\
(931.1i /
I
__,<R>.P
(931.3)
(931.1)
(931.7)
(931.1)
'" " '-'--f2:!J../>Y
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES
Lot 6, Block 1, BALDUR PARK
0 : denotes iron marker
~
"' '------._
(930,◄) ----------
EXISTING
HOUSE
#1432
-7
I
(908.3): denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum
!910.81: denotes proposed spot elevation, mean sea level datum
---917--: denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum
-@.@-: denotes proposed contour line, mean sea level datum
Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum.
This survey shows the boundaries of the above described property,
the location of a proposed house thereon. It does not purport to
show any other improvements or encroachments.
LAKE MINNETONKA
NORTH ARM
,,,_.• ,,.•929.4 CONTOUR LINE
'---'-'-
(931,a_ '-,,----r---::::._ --'-.;-I --=:::::::-'-if u<, (931,6) -f?.J, "/..'v ~ ·0 /t 1 ·
I
19/1
~& .~
~ 0'· '\
'\ ,...
0
I
I
(~1.5)
I
I
I
f
(~1,6~
_/
(931.◄)
(931.6)
~ y;i-931.5-_
I/
PROPOSED ELEVAT~NS
1) Garage = I 933.5 I
2) Lowest floor = !933.2!
3-1-06 ADDITIONAL TOPOGRAPHY, HOUSE #1428 LOCATED ECO ASS C AT s INC
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was
prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that
I am a duly licensed professional enginner and land
surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3-13-06 HALF-Fooi CONTOURS a PROPOSED coHTbURS SHOWN • Q . I E , •
3 3·30-06 PROPOSED HOUSE MOVED UP AGAINST AVERAGE BUILDING SETBACK LINE • CONSUL TING ENGINEERS, LAND
DATE DESCRIPTION $ GRONBERG AND
: CHECKED SURVEYORS, AND SITE PLANNERS ~~ MSG 445 NORTH WILLOW DR. LONG LAKE, MN. 55356
952-473-4141 Mark S. Gronberg MN Lie. No. 12755 Date 7·J' tJ,,:,,s
06-063
SCALE
1"=20'
DATE
2-22-06
JOB NO.
06-063
DES!GNEO
DRAWN
ECO
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR
JEFFREY P. MIKKELSON
OF LOT 6, BLOCK 1, BALDUR PARK
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
LAKE MINNETONKA
NORTH AFW.
{931,1)
\
{9)1,7) / (931.7)
ti(,~ {931.1) -~
(931,l)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES
Lot 6, Block 1, BALDUR PARK
0 : denotes iron marker
(908.3): denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum
@]]]]: denotes proposed spot elevation, mean sea level datum
--·917--•: denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum
--@2±)--: denotes proposed contour line, mean sea level datum
Bearings shown ore based upon an assumed datum.
This survey shows the boundaries of the above described property,
the location of a proposed house t~ereon. It does not purport to
show any other improvements or ehcroacl'iments.
:.;~: :,~;;;;i::~;;,::::~~:,c.,~,:""" ASSOCIATES, INC.
/
/
{931.6)
y-s,--93+. 5----
PROPOSED ELEV A TIONS
1) Gorage = ~
2) Lowest floor = ~
I hereby certify that this plan, speolflcatlon, or report was
prepared by me, or under my direct eupetv1s1on, and that
I am a duty Ucensed professional englnner and land
surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota
DAT< DESC,.TIDN $ GRONBERG AND
1-1-1-=:;:--=~-1 -=~-'~_-,~-•-~_.,~-1f-t,;::_,:;_,.;::_ -~•=_.,,;_.;_v,;;:_•=_ -==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--lj CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND
CHECKED SURVEYORS, AND SITE PLANNERS
MSG l---l----t------------------1 NORTH W!Ll~~2~~73~~~~1LAKE, MN. 55356 Mark S. Gronberg MN Uc. No. 12755 Date ___ _
06-063
SCALE
1"=20'
OATE
2-22-06
JOB NO,
06-063
··r--:
DESIGNED REVISION
1
l
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR
JEFFREY P. MIKKELSON
OF LOT 6, BLOCK 1, BALDUR PARK
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
EXISTING
HOUSE .J #1428 (931.1)
\
{931.7) / (931.7)
ti.~ (931.1)
..--r.R>
(931.3)
'•.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES
Lot 6, Block 1, BALDUR PARK
0 : denotes iron marker
(930,4)
EXISTING
HOUSE
#1432
-,
I
(908.3): denotes existing spot eleyation, mean sea level datum
)910.8) : denotes proposed spot-elevation, mean sea level datum
---917--•: denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum
-{gQ1]-: denotes proposed contour line, mean sea level datum
Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum.
This survey shows the boundaries of the above described property,
the location of C! proposed house t,bereon., It does not purport to
show any other improvements or e·ncroacnments.
DESCRIPTION
ADDITIONAL TOPOGRAPHY, HOU_SE #1-428 LOCATED
HALF,FOOT CC
LAKE MINNETONKA
NORTH ARM
f~· ••• •929.4 CONTOUR LINE
"-\
\
\
\
'-.. '--'--
(931.~ '-.
;;;-~------'--, if . (931.6) ../!.J,
" L • .... ~ -.. DECK •OJ
/~ ~ ....
I
~'Vi
B
0~
.'>( ~ V) '\
'\ r-0
I
\
(971,5)
I
I
I
I
/ I
(~1.6) _/
(931,4)
(931.6)
PROPOSED ELEV A TIONS
1) Garage = 1933.51
2) Lowest floor = )933.2)
AL ruuvA.r e
. . . ~HT~U~S~;~;P;SE~C~~T~~~S~OWH •~1 $:· ~:rt~!~~t~c. I I I '•-~ I ,m ,.,._ I CONSULTING ENGINEER$, LAND
CHECKED . . . . SURVEYORS, AND SITE PLANNERS
MSG . · 445 NORTH WILLOW DR. LONG LAKE, MN. 55356
952-473-4141
I
3 I
I hereby certify that this plan, speoiflcatlon, or report was
prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that
I am a duly licensed professional enginner and land
surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota
~.d~
MN Lio. I Mark S, Gronberg MN Lio. No. 1::!755 Date/~,?11•()/'
06-063
SCALE
1"=20'
DATE
2-22-06
JOB NO.
06-063
06-3182, Jeff Mikkelson, 1436 Baldur Park Rd
• Lot Width, Lot Area, Hardcover, and Lake Setback Variances
• CUP Land Alteration within the 100-year flood plain
FILE#06-3182
16 March 2006
Page 1 of 2
Zoning District:
Lot Area:
LR-1C, Single Family Lakeshore Residential,½ acre minimum
0.19 acre (8, 179 s.f.)
Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variances in order to construct a
new single family residence. The variances consist of lot area and lot width variances
for a lot 8,179 s.f. in area and 51'-55' in width where 21,780 s.f and 100' is normally
required, and 0-75' hardcover variance to allow 987 s.f. or 24% hardcover and 75'-250'
hardcover variance to allow 1,518 s.f. or 36.7% hardcover where 25% is normally
allowed. A conditional use permit in order to conduct land alterations below the 931.5'
100-year floodplain elevation is also required.
Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends approval of the lot width, lot area,
lake setback and some level of hardcover variances in conjunction with the
redevelopment of this property. The applicant must receive approvals from the MCWD
for the work below the 931.5' elevation. Planning staff also recommends approval of the
conditional use permit for grading and fill within the floodplain incorporating the
recommendations of the MCWD and the City Engineer. Finally, the applicant will be
required to submit an as-built grading plan prior to issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy.
Exhibit A -
Exhibit B -
Exhibit C -
Exhibit D -
Exhibit E -
Exhibit F -
Exhibit G -
Exhibit H -
Exhibit I -
Exhibit J -
Background
Application
Hardship Documentation Form
Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan
Proposed Plans and Elevations
Submitted Hardcover Calculations
Letters from City Engineer
Floodplain Mitigation Calculations
Aerial Photo
Property Owners List
Plat Map
The applicant is requesting lot area, lot width and 0-75' and 75'-250' hardcover
variances in order to construct a new single family residence on his property. The lot is
substandard in width and area and the application of the 75' lake setback allows for only
about 40' of buildable area depth. The applicant is proposing a 1,495 s.f. home and
minimal hardcover to support the home. The application includes lot area, lot width, and
lake yard setback as well as hardcover variances. Additionally, a conditional use permit
to conduct land alterations within the 100-year flood elevation (931.5') is requested.
1
LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET
Lot Area/Width:
LR-1C
Required
Lot Area
21,780 s.f.
Lot Width
(0.5 acre) 100'
FILE#06-3182
16 March 2006
Page 2 of 2
Actual 8,179 s.f. (0.19 acre) 51' (at the OHWL)
55'at the 75' setback
Setbacks:
LR-1C Required Proposed
Front/Lakeshore 75' 42'
Rear 30' 35.1'
West Side 10' 10.6'
East Side 10' 10.7'
Average Lakeshore The proposed new home will be located behind the average
lakeshore setback.
St t IC rue ura overaae:
Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage
8,179 s.f. (0.19 acre) Allowed*: 1,500s.f. (18.3%)
Proposed: 1,495 s.f. (18.2%)
*Per Section 78-1403, lots under 10,000 s.f. in area are permitted 1,500 s.f. of structural
coverage including principal structure and garage.
Hardcover Calculations·
Hardcover Total Area in Allowed Proposed
Zone Zone Hardcover Hardcover
0-75 4,047 s.f. 0 s.f 987 s.f.
(0%) (24.39%)
75-250 4,132 s.f. 1,033 s.f. 1,518 s.f.
(25%) (36.74%)
* After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds
2
',··.
OFF\C 1== /
. ... --====-'-I---••• I
•!: il l
I
I'
Ill OFEN TC <=CC"
,,,
., -
•II
•i
I
I 1·
i
'!I
-~1=-
1 -I~
I
\1:
.. ,
'
.. :Jt~E.,
:•i ,.1/'
(:~;r:::=s~:~?i1:_:~l
··:,.'
~<-,: .. ;•,::·:~:--•'
,,-·
r--1·
\I I
I
1\ I
· r :I
I
11
11
11
!I
. ·-·· -~· .. ·• ... : ..
J
·1·.----;;
', ~
l ~~~
-
-----
11
:r ~
11
I
1F
-'-----~~----!ILi---_~_-. __ -_. -----=-=-:--:,::-:-"=-= __ =-= ... , ... ,=>i -:_=-:._,,, .. '= ... ,':;=>.,::::-:==--==-=-=-=·
I! 'I J} p .-,:/.'• :-· "'.;· •.. ;-;;, tI '_.-.. ·-,·.,··_.i: __ ·: __ ,,-_.·_' ·-,':·~.·-·.·._·._:,·_:·:_.,·'_,,·_,_,:::_:,-:,·:, 'i;_ ..• ·;_,·_:··_.::_·· .. __ •:,·.::_.·_::··~:,·· .. ·:_:'.:-'_i,i __ ·,( .. ·-.'.:.'·.:·,i . J1 i;::t:]f:'.:;,:.-fL ·. , '.· : . (;_:: . --. ~
z
0
j::
-<t: > ,w
-'
I ~~
I ..... ~~~
I ----~
1:
I
,1
I __ 1·
I
!
I
]_
1
l
I
lj
II-
11
I
I
J 1
I
I
I
I
j
I ___ j __ _
_I
----
( . ....c...._\
__ Ji} __
!I
1\
' ,j
z
Q
. 1-
-<f >:
1:i.1
---1
1.1.J
1-·
T
~j
oz
1~r~:,~~'~)~ -(I~ii;;;--~~
1.;_·.. .. .,; _.-~
<,,:,,,;;:cP'-1 f~;;;j}
(93Ut)
(930)
·'\---.
\ -
\
(~ . =_ ··•.--.
\ / . ---
_c -__ · ~ LA~E-~ 'M 1HNETONKA
N10RTH ARM
EXllST l~G
G.AlRAGE
--------... -.--~
r----. ··-··-----;~ IJI
~-.
~ -------·· ~
;) !
~' .
/, i
11, ..• /··
.1,
---------~',i e--1 --------➔••"-------------------~>+----~----IL ---.. _J
II 1il I
-,j II .! .!
-i I ,;-1 i----------11'
I
!
,.
"' ~l .. ....
' .. '
111
Ill -~...,....,.~-~,,,11
,-----·-~i i
1111
'ljl l
lll-
li!
hi
·111
Ill
'iii l\i
iii ' 1111
;j,, ,Jji '
•a11 J hl
!Ii llji
~-·---11I' 11111
I i,----;!i------------------
-a•· I
-... ~\~Sc~,'"'\•,.._ I ._ .,-. 1111 _,a--t.
.... _·:---.. ____ -..:::-::: *. 1111 ~~"'/: .. ~:,~-·
1j1 ··----.. ·,. -·~ -:=--'-----If.=-,---
---~ I _,j
.,._.,.;::3-',.I ..::::::;::--!Ir
7
irl ~-r~_;:·.~•-··? ;:1 ·:1. 1;.:-r.i!Vi~:\i~!r'trti~r:1n
({; .. ~:L / .. ,.~.--~ .:·::~ t::!::·d.,~t };:_;~.i:E:·_:;;:
rn~•.•.:<•l•·J•:;_;•:t~ ::•_;•:•rv'i n ~;•,•~~':'.1!";,:}i! ('.~,~-~\~,~;~:
--~r, . ..._ /
Iii ·-·-·-.....,,. I 1i
_.,.,..._~=c..··..o.4_' -~,-~--~------~'------"10,_··.="c.." ---.--;-2~),,
'X'" -----------·-----/.
; ' ~:
\'.:::.··_. .. --~;; ·.!•J
!F IRST I
I ,::J
I ,."J
F1ui-,:.
I ,,:, ... ,,. ,•,
I ! ••<>•· ...... ; •. so
{~
City of Orono
2750 Kelley Parkway
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
(952) 249-4600
Fax: (952) 249-4616
FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET
Date: 10 March 2006
To: Jeff Mikkelson
Fax: 952-471-3257
Re: Engineer Comments
Sender: Melanie Curtis, City Planner
YOU SHOULD RECEIVE 2 PAGE(S), INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET. IF YOU DO NOT
RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL 952.249.4627.
Jeff -I received comments from our Engineer today. His comments indicate the need
to update your survey to provide additional information. We require this information be
submitted by noon on Tuesday, March 14th in order to remain on the agenda for
March 20th .
In order to expedite things please have one copies delivered to me and one copy sent
directly to:
Tom Kellogg
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates
2335 West Highway 36
St. Paul, MN 55113
Please contact me at 952.249.4627 or Tom Kellogg at 651-604-4863 if you have any
questions. ,.
Cont rmat ion Report -Memory Send
Time Mar-10-2006 03:41pm
Tel I ine +9522494616
Name CITY OF ORONO
Job number 450
Date Mar-10 03:40pm
To 4713257
Document pages 002
Start time Mar-10 03:40pm
End time Mar-10 03:41pm
Pages sent 002
Status OK
Job number 450 *** SEND SUCCESSFUL ***
City of Orono
Date: 1 O March 2006
To: Jeff Mikkelson
Fax: 952-471-3257
2750 Kelley Parkvvay p_o_ Box BB
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
(952) 249-4600
Fax: (952) 249-46"16
FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET
Re: Engineer Comments
Sender: Melanie Curtis, City Planner·
YOU SHOULD RECE:IVE 2 PAGE(S), INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET. IF YOU DO NOT
RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL 952.249.4627.
Jeff -I received comments from our Engineer today_ His comments indicate the need
to update your survey to provide additional information_ VVe require this information be
submitted by noon on Tuesday, March "14th in order to remain on the agenda for
March 20th •
In order to expedite things please have one copies delivered to me and one copy sent
directly to:
Tom Kellogg
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates
2335 VVes1: Highway 36
St. Paul, MN 55"1"13
Please contact me at 952.249.4627 or Tom Kellogg at 651-604-4863 if you have any
questions.
Date: 3/14/2006
To: Tom Kellogg
Fax: 651-636-1311
City of Orono
2750 Kelley Parkway
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
(952) 249-4600
Fax: (952) 249-4616
FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET
Re: 06-3182 I 1436 Baldur Park Rd
Sender: Melanie Curtis, City Planner
YOU SHOULD RECEIVE 3 PAGE(S), INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET. IF YOU DO NOT
RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL 952.249.4627.
Tom -I received information from Gronberg about 1436 Baldur Park Rd. Please
review ... obviously you are not able to see the blue and yellow highlighted areas in the
fax, but I hope the applicant listened to my advice and sent you your own copy ....
Please contact me at 952.249.4627 if you have any questions.
MAR-07-06 TUE 21 : 47 JEfF .. J'.J .. ;£ !<.KELSON 612 383 0604
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNfRS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM
' /I .,
I (we) ..)£'II ,v r. lj. ;f N
[print name(s)J
of f L/ 'f i,,J f,1 '--/J.., l f •1--f.. u,. ,t,-,,r:f'
[print address]
have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the p_ro,eerty located at J l/36· fu.U;1r ~~k. CL\,. also referred lo as Land Use Application No . .f2l-3/Z.-L
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are)_ not aske~ to declare
approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Counc1l that I (~e)
am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires
council approval.
J ,, ·; .,., ... ;J ·""c
___ ci_t;_f' _.-v_/'_._,_!> _ .... _,_f "" ____ J..!!.V___.'/~_e,_/ ___ _,,~::....-~:._.._..,_··( ____ ... .::.·-_,:,_·, ._,;_·-~_f_..,.·: .... -~·-·
Property Owner Dale 1
·
Property Owner Date
I (we) _____________ of __________ ~
[print name(s}] (print address]
have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at
_________ also referred to as Land Use Application No. ___ .
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare
approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we)
am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires
Council approval.
Property owner Date
Property Owner Date
[
•:,;:;-A F m===•J If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use
Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 1 o days
prior to the scheduled meeting date.
P.01
CITY of ORONO
March 2, 2006
Jeff Mikkelson
1436 Baldur Park Rd
Wayzata, :MN 55391
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
SUBJECT: Zoning Application #06-3182
Municipal Offices
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
The City of Orono is required to notify you within fifteen (15) business days as to the status of your
application for variances for property located at 1436 Baldur Park Road. Our preliminary review
indicates that your application is complete. However, based on the comments from the initial
engineering review there is potential that our Engineer will require additional information. Please
· · ·-1m:rkibrthe-Engineers-commenrl:etterto-foHow-upon-compleHon-ef-his-revie·"· .,__ ------------
your application is scheduled to appear before the Planning Commission on Monday, March 20th ,
2006. The meeting begins at 6:00 p.m. Please make sure that you or your representative is available
to attend the meeting. You will be mailed a staff report regarding your application prior to the
meeting date.
Please call me at 952.249.4627 should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
City of Orono
1 .,. ~
C lt-ttl{ti(tl (? tc.rrJ:;
Melanie Curtis
City Planner
Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fax (952) 249-4616
www.ci.orono.mn.us
DESIGNED
DRAWN
ECO
CHECKED
MSG
06-063
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR
JEFFREY P. MIKKELSON
OF LOT 6, BLOCK 1, BALDUR PARK
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
~
~
LAKE MINNETONKA
NORTH ARM
EXISTING
HOUSE
#1428 (931,1)
(931.7) (931,7)
(931.1)
(931,l)
~
7.__\
\
EXISTING ,. '
GARAGE,.
'·
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES
Lot 6, Block 1, BALDUR PARK
o : denotes iron marker
~
(930.4) -------
EXISTING
HOUSE
#1432
-;
I
(931.6)
(908.3): denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum
[910.8[: denotes proposed spot elevation, mean sea level datum
--,u 5'.s ,.,
~&
0~
/;:/
V)
r-
0
(931.5)
---917 --• : denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum
Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum.
REVISION I DATE
e} 13-/•06'
This survey shows the boundaries of the above described property,
the location of a proposed house thereon. It does not purport to
show any other improvements or encroachments.
DESCRIPTION GRONBERG AND
ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND
SURVEYORS, AND SITE PLANNERS
445 NORTH WILLOW DR. LONG LAKE, MN. 55356
9.52-473-4141
(931.5)
(931.6) '--~-1, ·O)
(931.◄)
(931.6)
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
1) Garage = 1933.51
2) Lowest floor = I 933.2 I
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was
prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that
I am a duly licensed professional enginner and land
surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota
~✓ d /4"'___.✓.',=-o/
Mark S. Gronberg MN Lie. No. 12755 Date ?, /-ti C
SCALE
1"=20'
DATE
2-22-06
JOB NO.
06-063
}
City of Orono
Pre-Application Meeting Form
(This form is to be completed by a City Planner during your pre -application meeting.*)
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
For Office Use Only: .P ,/ ·
City Planner: 1\11v , Jl.Yl I(;
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
O rono , MN 55356 Crysta l Bay, MN 55323-0 066 Meet i ng Date/Time: _ _._f?-k-=-=c-="-l_.1 _____ _
Ma in: 952-249-4600
Fax: 952-249-4616
PC Date: Mtl.vrVJ
What is the purpose of a pre-application meeting?
Pre-application meetings aid the applicant in preparing a complete proposal, inform them of the
procedures and requirements of the city code, and identify policies or regulations that create
opportunities or problems for the proposal.
PROPERTY INFORMf_Tlp~: /
Site Address: t.(5 6 f.)t:,dJvr ~ ck Kd-, 0(ot1 o , -~1'11 ~:,'39/ ' ' Property Identification Number (PIN):
Zoning District: lt,1-u Size of Property :
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
D Average Setback D Side Yard Setback
~ Hardco't5r_ ,S D Lot Coverage
□ Other: 75 ,1--0 0
----------
D Rear Yard Setback
)clot Area
J_.A.-ft,6 •~f~t Yard Setback
_p(Lot Width
Applicant's 11 I) II . HARDSHIP: Applicant has received the Hardship Documentation Form,
Initials: '/ Jt V v understands it as it has been explained to them, and is aware that it must
be completed and submitted in conjunction with their formal variance
1 application .
OTHE'R INFORMATION: ----~e~~~~Cb~~v,/_('\_e~x___._.__/~5 ~l-~;M___.1J~h~o~f1'.1<~_a~"'=J~. ~b~v~: '=tl -~ ,~?:r ~1;74 S ~~~:~;~ L°tt'~5i;b '.'.&~~'¼-
(/
I
r
,.
10'-0 1/4" I------~b'-S~i,2_" ,---,: _0_-6_" --.f_-2_1/4-..rl~5-'-4"____,1,_________
~~====;-';:=~~=t:_,~~-==-==-=====,;-"i~~l
1,1
11
111======
111
II
Iii
,II
1]1
II
1]1
Iii
DEN
DINING ROOM
----======~-----~
GREAT ROOM
WOOD STO ✓E (N,I_C;
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
SCALE 1/4''=1'-C'
I SEE 5ECOND FLOOR FRAHl~'J FLLN POR 5SCOi'1::> F'LOOR BEAr-1 and
HANGER SIZES
ALL INiERIOR PARTITIONS ..:.RE :/.d. e 24" 0.C., UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
S. REFER TO DOOR and WINDOW INST..\LLATION PAUES FOR ::)ET.AILS
0 INiERIOR u.;,J,LL LINER IS 1/2" G-YPSU,'1 WALLB04RC (N.I.C.) TYPICAc..
6:REENBOARD ! N.1 CJ !S USED BEHIND PLUMBING FIXTURES FROM
FLOOR LEvEL "i"Q ...l.' ,;:.eovE FLOOR LEVEL and TH~OUG~CUT TUB
and SHOWER ENCLOSURES
7 INTERIOR ROOF 1-ll-!ER 15 ?16" GYPSUM WALLBQ;.\RD (l-l.l.C.1
UNLESS NOTEC OTl-lERWISE
!?/8 G..,'PSU"1
9 DO 1-IOT DRILL f-lOLES THRo,.,;c,.µ FOSTS or BEL.HS
10. CLOSET SHELVING and RODS ARE BY OTHERS
IL AT CONTRACTCR.S DISCRETION, ~..:i.lSE WINCOWS TO ALLOW CLEARANCE
FOR PRE-FCRH:EC· COUNTER/BACKSPLASH A5SEHBL l
I?. LINDAL CEDAR HOMES INC, DOES NOT RECOHHEN::) TJ..!E USE OF .:.NY fORH
OF HUMIDIFIER !N CONDITIONED LIVING SPt.CES. µuMIDIFIERS ADD
MOISTURE 7µ.,:.7 MAY PROMOTE HOLD C:::RCWTH, CONDENSATION AN::, 07"-IER
HO!STURE R.ELl;;.,TED FROBLE:'15
13. RECESSED C,..',.NISTER LIGHTl"-IG IS NOT TO BE
CATHEDRAL CEILING. THE USE OF RECESSED
Tf-lE ROOF'S ABILITY TO PERFOR,'"1 PROFERL Y
DIRECTLY IN70 THE ROCf" c.:.vlTY
!4
□
as presented
□ opDt"O•i2d
with
By
Homeovine1·
Distributu
SHEETS, REDUCE SCALE BY HALF
SQ. FT
SQ.FT
cote
dote
>-Ill
If) z
Q
If) > w
"'
w
I-<(
0
0: w z
" 0 w ::;;
0 ::c
I • -, '!' 1 ·~ ! i ,:
/l,
Cl
ll'
0
z
<;) ii;; '" llJ 0 Cl I'
~I
§I. ji '" '" 0' '-' I :
I
1~ I 1w
I~
0
]o
,Cl I~
II
10
'"' 'Q_
,Q_
<(
1·~
"' I~ ,o ,,-
'"' :,
'U
r.fJ
J
$-4
◄~ ~
.---4
]
•,-I
.....:l
I,_ :w "' ,z '!
i~ r: w 5 ,, ~ Q I"' ll'
'0 0
d z "'
io:
.
z z --' ~ ~ "[
:TI Cl : 0 ,". ~ 'I-Cl --' :::,
I! t \J
j' If) <ii ,; l!d "' ~ 0: ~5 I~ Ii: w
: 0 q If) \J
ORDER NUMBER
KD4iZ>l64
~ f
J
,0:
jW I~
'~
i~ ~ 13' "' ! ~ i§
"T
0
0 ;
a:
1~
<(
\)
3 ~ ::;; IL
I PAGE
I I
32'-0"
12'-0 3/4"
61:DROOM
B'-b 31.d."
%: _J
~5~=-===:::..:=====,=~=l===:_j ~.-
CLr5ET CLOSET "'/
/ I
I
rt:=:==
OPEN TO BELOW
5'-4' 5'-4' '0'-6"
;;>2'-0"
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
SCALE 1/4"=1'-0"
L SEE ROOF FR4MING PLAN FOR SECOND FLOOR GIRDER and 1-14NGER SIZES.
ALL El-ECTRICAL WIRING Bt1d FXTURES, PLUMBING ;::1xT1JRES, AFFLIANCES,
and CABINETS ARE N.I.C. and ARE S!-IOUJN FOR REFERENCE CNL Y
iNTERICR P4RTITIONS ARE 2/4 'Ill 24" O.C., UN-ESS 0..,..1-iERWiSE NOTED
5 REFER TO DOOR and WINDOW INSTA'-LATION PAGES FOR DETA,LS
b. lr--.'TERIOR W....:.LL :...l•'-.ER .IS 1/J'' GYPSUM WALLBOARD <N.I.C.), TYPICAL.
GREENBOARD <N.I.C.) 15 USED BEI-IIND FLUM!3!N.G FIXTURES FROr-'
FLOOR LEvEL TO 4' ABOvE FLOOR LEVEL and TI-IROUGI-IOUT TUB
a>1d SI-IOWER ENCLOSURES
7 INTERIOR ROOF LINER 15 516" GYPSUM WALLBOARD {'l.l.C.I,
UNLESS NOTED OT ~ERWISE
0 DO NOT DRILL J...IOLES TI-IRCi.JG:1-1 POSTS or BEAMS
'::l CLOSET SI-IELV!NG 2lnd RODS .4RE BY OTI-IERS
10. AT CONTRACTORS DISCRETION, RAISE 1.l.llhDOLJJS TO .!..LLOW CLEARANCE ;:oR
FRE-FOR.a"1ED COUNTER,'6ACKSF'-ASI-I ASSEM5L --r
LIN~AL CED/4R I-IOr--:ES INC. DOES NOT RECOMl"'"'END Tl-IE USE OF ANY FORM
OF I-IUMIDIFIER IN CONDITIONED LIVING sp;..cEs. HUMIDIFIERS ADD
MOISTURE Tl-l..:..T H/4Y PROMOTE MOLD GRCUJn-•, CONDENSATION .!:.NC OTI-IER
MOISTURE REL.4TED PROBLEMS
12. RECESSED c,.:,..NISTER LIGl-lTl1';G ;5 NOT TO BE NSTALLED IN ANY iN5ULATED
CATI-IEDR,.;.L CEILING. THE USE O;; RECESSED C.:l,N!STER LIGI-ITING REDUCES
'3
THE ROOF'S ..lBILITY TO PERFOR!'1 PROPER'.... Y BY INTRODUCING A I-IEAT SOURCE
DIRECTLY INTO 7f..1E ROOF CAVITr.
!7" SHEETS, REDUCE SCALE BY I-IALF
~
V>
t-w w :c Vl
" 13
ir
0
"' w z
3:
0 w ::;
0
J:
0 w > 0
iff: lo_
I~ 10 ,>-
'VJ ::,
(J
r:n
I
$-t
◄~ ~
~ ~ s:: • .--4
~
I
I
>-
~ ID "' z "' X "' r: !w § <( " I>-
" "' O' <( 5 a a
~ w
z z _J
()
' "' '" _,
"l ,o <ii G
Ii w ~ w G _J ~ t \)
j' U) <ii 'j' w <D
it f-1i': j
"'
:~ ~ w
0 U) \)
ORDER NUMBER
KD4<2)164
'-' 1:;
"' I<(
"' 0
() ::;
~
ii:
<[
...J ll
w 3 0 ~ 0 ::; (L
1 PAGE
2
-! : 1l
:,
-" > :, r
L
L ~
r
-" ~ :,
ii :,
:J -
-
]
! = i 2
1 IF
I
J.
0 ;o
~~ "'z l:lc: il'/ii "'"' ;o
" "' 1'i f'l
"ill
G\ r
-I
m r m
~
-I
~
HOMEOWNER
JEFF MIKKELSON
---~------~
DISTRIBUTOR
AFFINIT'T DESIGN t ENG.
SERIES
CLASSIC LIND,",L
-----'''
MODEL
PROW CAPISTRANO
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE SEE NATIONAi. [VALUATION SERVIC[ REf'ORT
31" X 30" NO. 461 FOR ALLOWABLE VALUES JiJlD/OR
CONDITIONS ()f usr. COtJCERNIN(, MATERIAL
DRAWN BY f'!lESE~ITED IN THIS DOCUMENl. 11 l'.'i
SUBJECT TO RE-EX/\MINATIOl-1. REVi'ilQN':i
RAM AND l'OSSl81E CLOSING
DATE "Thie
0I/Cl/06
DRAWING
40164LC2 Homes"
BELOW YOU
INFOR~AATION
A IIA::, B[EN
DATE
Lindal Cedar Hom.es CUSTOMER APPROVED DATE
DATE
EE Al ~a 8
rO ::!:i 8~ ~
th 1~ is, ,,m OJ
~~ ~ () U -l
z[:: ffi
f~r ~
l>Gi°
('<I ~~
~011 o~ mO -~
i, z n m
< z
i"'
~
~ m
~ ;
n p
~
~
]>
@
~ r.,
'i
;)
'l
Cl/01/061 DESl(;;N ORDER
•2¼ "'
•St '3>
'·" "4~
•5 ~ "''
•0> "6>
·1> ll')t
--rr
~
-I
m r m
~
-I
2
REVISIONS I BY
,,,
,2,
,3,
,4}
,,::>t
,0,
I ,1,
HOMEOWNER
0 "'I JE!=F MiKKEL.SON 0 ~ ~ DISTRIBUTOR i ~ --· ArFINITY DESIGN -!" E~G
.r, [ll SERIES
:,J
CLA5$1C LINDAL
"1J
-I>~
'"
MODEL
PROW CAPISTRANO
r m
71
--t
m r m < l>
--t
5 z
I
I I
"' to ~
"
I I ,.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE ■ t:,u10NAL EVAL1J111toN srnv1cE Pr:Porn
32" / 30"
DRAWN BY
RAM
DATE
01101/0b
DRAWING NUMBER
40104LC2
1/0. 461 r-GR !UOWABL[ \/NUES AND/OP
ruH[•ITIOH\ I!';[ CflNITRNll·IC. 1,IAf[Rll,l
r0Rf.SU~TED 11-1 fHIS oucu~1t·1n. IT IS
TO RE-EXN,IINATIOU,REVISIOH':,
~ND POS''.,IBLf. CLO:,ING.
Jlc
r,1,1dtKf' produtb, 1mle·.~ wn\ten
15 fir,.l oblo1w"I r,on, Llndol(>dnr
llomes"
70 m
)>
70
m r m < )>
--t
() z 111:1 I I 11111111111111:I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I IY/ /~J,
w
REVISIONS BY
A •31 '31
1 ,lt
•2 ~
•3t
Lindal Cedar Homes CUSTOMER APPROVED DATE
•o!} ,4, f•!$
•St '5> ,s,
•01 •01 ,0,
,7, ..,, ,1,
FRONT ELEVATION
iO'·O'
S'-0" S'-0"
ei,ARAGE
r--------1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
.I
C+-+ECK WITH G:ARAC:E CCCR HrC:
;::OR ExACT RO. REQUIREMENTS
10'-0"
RIGl-!T ELEVATION
I0-0'
LOFT
&SSDE J &%De",
I \ /
5'' -0" '~ /, \_,,/ 5'' -C'' j,
I0'-0"
I
-
REAR ELEVATION
GARAGE
LOFT
200 SQ. FT
200 SQ. FT
DET ACl-!ED GARAGE
~C.l.LE L-1"=1'-~"
' CAULK ALL JOl:--lTB SUBJECT TO ,J,IR Jr,dlor W..I.TER INFILTR..:.TION
5UCl-l LS AROU"lD DOORe, UJI-...DOUJB ,and 13E.J.HB PROTRJDit-.;G Tl-jp;;;:Qi.JGi-l
EXTERIOR ;J.JLLL.S CF BUILD NG.
2. EXTERIOR 61Dl~G 0H-4LL 13E 11-'IW";.:tl' BEVEL RE6.4~N FACE TIGHT KNO-
CED..:..R i::ti.cE '-.IA,L FE-.?. E/TERIOR U.IALL DETAIL!:
ROOfNG iS 51 OTHE~S
WINDCWB A~ L!:-....DAL HIGH P::R;::ORMANCE VINYL i::RAME rSAND CO'...CR)
WIT:..+ 1..0W-E / .l.RGON G:1..AZING.
S. 5W'NG11'1G EXTERIOR 000::..e, IN EXP06ED LOCATION6 M.L.,Y REQUIRE THE
.l.DDi710'l OF C\Je-TOMER 5UPP:..!ED ~TORM DOORe TO A551ST WiT!-l PREVENTiNG
AIR ,.'..'-1.D ;JJt..TER INFIL TRAT'01'.i.
0. GRACE HUST S~OPE /4WAY FROM BUILDING.
CONTRLCTOR TO VERIFY GR..C..DE LOCATION,
8. WHEREVER POSS"BLE, i...lNDAL CEDAR hOME5 INC. RECOMi"iEND5 THE USE o;::
GUTTER ..iND DO:J..NSPOUT 5Y57 EMS. 7'!-IE DOWNSPOUTS 51-IOULS' DRAl:,..i 4 MINIMUM
Cr 10'-0" AW,t;-r FROM TrlE BUILDING.
'o, WHEN PLAN5 4RE ON ii" x 17'' SHEET.$, '-<::EDUCE SCALE BY HALF
FOR PROP~R Dl;--;Ei,.JSION
I
,_ -----
FRONT ELEVATION
\.\
>-ID
V) z 0
iii > w
0::
w
~
Q
0:: w z s:
0 w ::;
0
I
ffi
()
"' ()
z "l
"' w ~; IP 7 J; ;1~ 0
"' S>
~
i5 cl, ' "" ~ r ! ••
I
lw ;~ !~ "<( ,o Q
Q w
Q I> w :o
> 0::
0 ,()_
0:: ,0.
,o. i<C :~ 0:: w
'o:: ::;
w 0
<I. I-
V)
w ::,
0 (.)
Cf)
E ~
~ ◄~ -~ $:l ......
~
Ji w 0
z ~ ,! ~
0 0:: l" j 0 ill 0 "' z w I-0 ::; i[
~ ::, q
ID ~ (/) C)
..J
C)
J: QC "' ;i' w "' w 3
ll: I-QC J Q 0 (/) li: w 0 "' ~ 15 <I (/) C) ::; (L
ORDER NUMBER !PAGE
KD412)164 !:,
!i?
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR
JEFFREY P. MIKKELSON
OF LOT 6, BLOCK 1, BALDUR PARK
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
LAKE MINNETONKA
(931.6)
EXISTING
HOUSE
#1432
-7
I
···, B£.4c
. Ro,1o'S!o1>
WAY:
~ -0
O 44'(Jo,, Ii~
NORTH ARM
__ ... --929.4 CONTOUR LINE
\ AVERAGE BUILDING / /
--........_ . ;,( SETBACK LINE /
.__,J\ (930 .9) _ _n__-y\
r-, ~~ -,
J !·-. ....._ (931.0)
_.;· ··-... _?ECK~,
... ~---. ,u.o~ ,....... ........_
... !933.51
_...--'PROPOSED
j'~
&.~
~&
~ 0
~
V) (931 .6)
,--...--
,.J
EXISTING
GARAGE
-
EXISTING
HOUSE
#1440
--------
(931.6)
ry 59 8,
B,4lDuR~AR
PROPOSED ELEV A TIONS
1) Garage = I 933.5 I
~31.4) 'I( Ro,4D
2) Lowest floor = !933.2!
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES
Lot 6, Block 1, BALDUR PARK
o : denotes iron marker
!i?
(908.3): denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum
---917 --: denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum
Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum.
This survey shows the boundaries of the above described property,
the location of a proposed house thereon. It does not purport to
show any other improvements or encroachments.
I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision, and that I am a duly registered Civil Engineer
and Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
GRONBERG AND
ASSOCIATES, INC.
-tlt-+I _____ CONSUL TING ENGINEERS, LAND
SURVEYORS, & SITE PLANNERS
445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE, MN . 55356
ECO 952-473-4141
06-063
~✓-✓-~
Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota License Number 12755
~ '·. =\) ~ C
0' ~-·
~~
x~ ; ;
.::lf; ll
f '
\· I
{:~~:/>,
,y ,. -,..,...,..~: .
~
(j;·:, X..J -.:~. ;'
~;,.~": ~
.. --:.=--· .. ,---< . .
\
\
SCALE
1 "=20'
DATE
2-22-06
JOB NO.
06-063
SITE ADDRESS: 1436 Baldur Park Rd.
Applicant: Jeff Mikkelson
Address: 1436 Baldur Park Rd.
Wayzata, MN 55391
□ Meeting with Staff
□ Application Completed
□ Incomplete Notice Sent
Date:
Date:
Date:
Copy of Application Sent to:
17)11 Engineer _ County
1 Property Owners Notified: Date:
Legal Notice Published
PC Meeting( s):
Owner: Jeff Mikkelson
Address: 1436 Baldur Park Rd.
Wayzata, MN 55391
07:JOtO(tJ 60
DNR MCWD LMCD
cnl U 0
Vote:
Vote:
Vote: -------------------
□ Resolution:
STATEOFMINNESOTA)
)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) ss .
)
CITY OF ORONO )
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I, Denise M. Leskinen, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify
that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #06-3182, was mailed to the attached list of
property owners .
ln Witness Whereof, I have hereunto si~•Y of March, 2006.
Denise M. Leskinen
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616
NOTICE
The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Orono Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley
Parkway on Monday, March 20, 2006, beginning at 6:00 p.m. on the matter of reviewing the following
land use applications:
1.
2 .
3 .
4.
5 .
6.
7.
8.
#05-3139
#06-3170
#06-3172
#06-3177
#06-3179
#06-3180
#06-3181
#06-3182
Merry Beth Hovey on behalf of Hill School of Minnesota, Inc., 2180 North
Shore Drive, RR-lB zoning district, requests amendments to approvals granted
in December 2005 for side yard and side street setback variances in order
construct an addition for office space, and a conditional use permit amendment to
expand the school. The school is requesting a design change to the approved
addition to extend 10' further to the north and add a second story above the
addition.
Bruce Schmitt on behalf of Mary Jeanne Bowen, 985 Edgewood Hills Road, RR
-1 B zoning district, requests a front yard setback variance in order to construct a
porch addition to the front of the existing home.
Lem merman Construction Inc. on behalf of Timothy Russell & Lynn Ann Brady,
3555 Frederick Street, LR-IC zoning district, request 75'-250' hardcover and
side yard setback variances in order to construct garage and 2 nd story additions to
the existing home and after-the-fact approval of a boulder retaining wall within
75' of the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka.
William & Ann Mccrackin, 4355 Chippewa Lane, RR-IA zoning district,
request a conditional use permit for plumbing within an accessory structure in
order to construct a bathroom in the existing oversized accessory structure.
Thomas & Margaret Radke, 3424 East Lake Street, LR-IA zoning district,
request a 75' -250' hardcover variance for 36.55% hardcover where 25% is
normally allowed and 36.12% currently exists in order to construct a covered
porch entry and a pergola with patio on the lake side of the home.
Bruce Schmitt on behalf of William Ulrich , 2280 French Creek Circle, RR-IB
zoning district, requests a variance from the 150 ' lake setback in order to
construct a garage and home addition located completely within the 150' lake
setback.
Eskuche Creative Group on behalf of Dean & Kelly Leischow, 1200 Old Crystal
Bay Road, RR-1B zoning district, requests a conditional use permit to allow
plumbing within an accessory building on a property 2 .57 acres in area.
Jeff Mikkelson, 1436 Balclur Park Road, LR-lC zoning district, requests lot
area and lot width variances to permit construction of a new residence on an
existing lot 0.18 acres in area where 0 .5 acres is normally required and a width of
50' where 100' is normally required and hardcover variances for the 0-75' zone
to permit 24.3% hardcover where 0% is normally allowed and within the 75'-
250' zone to permit 36.7% hardcover where 25% .is normally allowed .
9. #06-3183
10. #06-3184
11. #06-3185
Paul Thomas Homes on behalf of Glenn Solie, 1430 Cherry Place, LR-lB
zoning district, requests lot width and lot area variances to permit construction of
a new residence on an existing lot 0.55 acre in area where 1.0 acre is normally
required and a width of 100' where 140' is normally required and a hardcover
variance within the 75'-250' zone to exceed the 25% level that is normally
allowed.
Paul Thomas Homes, 2965 Casco Point Road, LR-1 C zoning district, requests
lot width and lot area variances to permit construction of a new residence on an
existing lot 0.4 acre in area where 0.5 acre is normally required and a width of
60' where 100' is normally required and a hardcover variance within the 75'-
250' zone to exceed the 25% level that is normally allowed.
WJM Properties, LLC., 2605 Wayzata Boulevard West, I -Industrial zoning
district, requests commercial site plan approval for ~ 25,620 s.f. one-story
addition to the existing main commercial building; for a 250 s.f. connection
between the two accessory buildings on the property; and for revisions to the
approved parking plan. Also requested is a conditional use permit to allow the
placement of two 60' flag poles where only 40' would normally be allowed.
Applicant also requests an amendment of prior conditional use permit approvals
to revise conditions placed upon the outside storage and display ofautomobiles.
All persons wishing to be heard are encouraged to attend this meeting. This is not a final agenda and is
subject to change prior to the hearing. Written comments are accepted and should be submitted to the
City of Orono by March 15, 2006 if possible. Plans are available for review in the City Offices and all
interested persons are encouraged to contact the City for further information. For an appointment, please
c.all (952) 249-4600.
City of Orono
By: Planning Commission
~r~
Michael P. Gaffron, Planning Director
To be published in the Sun Sailor on March 9, 2006.
Posted at: Orono City Offices
Crystal Bay Post Office
Long Lake Post Office
2
RUN DATE: 2/21/2006
38 0811723340013
PROP ADDR 1424 BALDURPARKRD
OWNER NAME R J ROHRER ET AL
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
R J ROHRER/D LS HUTCHINSON
1424 BALDURPARKRD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 0811723340028
PROP ADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
OWNER NAME REGINALD A SPINDLER
TAXPAYER RA SPINDLER
NAME/ADDR SPRING FARM
8402 BURROUGHS RD W
DEER PARK WA 99006
38 0811723430002
PROP ADDR 3490 BIRCH LA
OWNER NAME GEORGE W STICKNEY ET AL
TAXPAYER GEORGE W STICKNEY
NAME/ADDR JUDITH E OLIVERIUS
3490 BIRCH LA
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 0811723430005
PROP ADDR 1440 BALDURPARKRD
OWNER NAME J P BOHN & S D BOHN
TAXPAYER JOHN &SUZANNE BOHN
NAME/ADDR 6377 OXBOW BEND
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
38 0811723430008
PROP ADDR 3510 NORTH SHORE DR
OWNER NAME MA LATTERNER/K M LATTERNER
TAXPAYER MICHAEL&KIMBERLYLATTERNER
NAME/ADDR 3510 NORTH SHORE DR
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 0811723430011
PROP ADDR 3540 NORTH SHORE DR
OWNER NAME D M PETTIPIECE ET AL W /LEST
TAXPAYER DOLORES M PETTIPIECE
NAME/ADDR 3540 NORTHSHORE DR
WAYZATAMN 55391
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 0811723340014 38 0811723340025
PROPADDR 1420 BALDUR PARK RD PROPADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
OWNER NAME BRADLEY J MCDONNELL ET AL OWNER NAME REGINALD A SPINDLER
TAXPAYER BRADLEY & CYNTHIA MCDONNELL TAXPAYER RA SPINDLER
NAME/ADDR 1420 BALD UR PARK RD NAME/ADDR SPRING FARM
WAYZATAMN 55391 8402 BURROUGHS RD W
DEERPARK WA 99006
38 0811723340059 38 081172343000 l
PROPADDR 1428 BALDUR PARK RD PROPADDR 3470 BIRCH LA
OWNER NAME THE HELi ROTH TRUST OWNER NAME T W BERNARD & L K BERNARD
TAXPAYER KENT & LORI ROTH TAXPAYER THOMAS W BERNARD
NAME/ADDR 1428 BALD UR PARK RD NAME/ADDR 3470 BIRCH LA
WAYZATAMN 55391 WAYZATAMN 55391
38 0811723430003 38 0811723430004
PROPADDR 1448 BALDURPARKRD PROPADDR 1444 BALDUR PARK RD
OWNER NAME J H & MR LA WREN CE OWNER NAME P J KA VENEY & LL KA VENEY
TAXPAYER JAY H & MARUS R LAWRENCE TAXPAYER P J KA VENEY & LL KA VENEY
NAME/ADDR 1448 BALDURPARKRD NAME/ADDR 1444 BALD UR PARK RD
WAYZATAMN 55391 WAYZATAMN 55391
38 08 l l 723430006 38 0811723430007
PROPADDR 1436 .BALDUR PARK RD PROPADDR 1432 BALDUR PARK RD
OWNER NAME JEFFREY PAUL MIKKELSON OWNER NAME JG & M R NYQUIST
TAXPAYER JEFFREY PAUL MIKKELSON TAXPAYER JOHN G & MAUREEN R NYQUIST
NAME/ADDR 1436 BALDUR PARK RD NAME/ADDR 1432 BALDUR PARK RD
WAYZATAMN 55391 WAYZATAMN 55391
38 0811723430009 38 0811723430010
PROPADDR 3520 NORTH SHORE DR PROPADDR 3530 NORTH SHORE DR
OWNER NAME RE SWENSON & V L SWENSON OWNER NAME ALBERT J ACKERMANN
TAXPAYER ROBERT E & VALERIE L SWENSON TAXPAYER A 1 ACKERMANN
NAME/ADDR 3520 NORTH SHORE DR NAME/ADDR 3530 NORTH SHORE DR
WAYZATAMN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391
PAGE: 1
Cl ----== newspapers
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
Richard Hendrickson, being duly sworn on an oath states or affirms, that he is the Chief Fi-
nancial Officer of the newspaper known as _______ S_u_n_-_S_a_il_o_r _____ _
and has full knowledge of the facts stated below:
(A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting qualification as a
qualified newspaper, as provided by Minn. Stat. §331 A.02, §331 A.07, and other applic-
able laws, as amended.
(B) The printed public notice that is attached was published in the newspaper once each
week, for _QlliL_ successive week(s); it was first published on Thursday, the _9_ day
of -~M=a~rc=h~_, 2006, and was thereafter printed and published on every Thursday
to and including Thursday, the __ day of ____ _, 2006; and printed below is
a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, which is hereby acknowl-
edged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of the
notice:
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
BY~
CFO
Subscribed and sworn to or affirmed before me
on this __ 9 _ day of _ _;M.;.;..a=r.c:.cch-'---_, 2006.
M,. ~J.S-o-.,
Nota~1/
• MARY ANN CARLSON
NOTARY PUBUC -MINNESOTA
PIN COMMISSION EXPIRES 1-31--09
RATE INFORMATION
(1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users
for comparable space
(2) Maximum rate allowed by law
(3) Rate actually charged
$ --~2=·=85=--pe=r~l=in=e
$ --~6~.2=0=-c.pe=r~l=in=e
$ ___ 1~.3=0=---pe=r'-'l"'"in=e
.ah :.ameodme nt,of, p rior-. ·.
, ·., -~· ;,perm Jrapprdva ls:10-" revjse · conditionsi place,d, ·.u p~n _lb!l.4' ."}f::: . , ... , ' , , , ,.~S~t~~!b,:r1~.~il .~,:-i•~.c-~ ., ·,•;/,;~~J~
-1111 • .ciri~~roarig~a.t6attil'rti:1 ;;.
•this meeli'n_g ; Th1s 'is:nora'fir1af age·nc;la-and is .sµbject -.to.'
·:change. pri or'. to;the.h:!la□-r:ig .;.¥fri_l_t.!lr.1:c9T,li1!!_n1!',are·ac.--,,,
cepted and·.,shoutd be.'subrriitted to i~e c,ty:of_.Or.~no,,bY ..
· Mari::h -1s · 2006'if possible. Plans are available foqev,e\'I'· ·
',in :ttie Clty '·Offices °iin'il _ali':inteiisted persons .al e eiico u~; "·
aged to. ~ontac,t tli'e ,Ci.fy'fo.(further info r an :~e:.~-
., pointment, 'please,c11,ll,.(95~) 24,9-1l>Q0 · .J,;;,·,,-., ;~t}~~~~:~~~~
FEB-28-06 TUE 08:59 JEFF MIKKELSON 612 383 0604
ADJACENT PROPERlY OWNf;RS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM
I (we)SJ. {. /J'l,, (!J-'4vi 'i of }tJ 3a, [Sa ld ,1( &ck (I.)..
{print name(s)l [print address}
have r!ewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at
/ !-/2!0 ~lJvr tock ill,_ also referred to as Land ,use Application No'2~ -3/gl. .
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare
approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm. for the City_ Council that I (~e)
am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's proJect or use requires
Council-approval. ,
\\ , (.,.,/1 /, ) 1,../, / ,// ·, \ \., v \,_,. ·-. ! J• V. .... , ,,
Property Owner ..
Property Owner Date
I (we) _____________ of __________ .
[print name(s)] [print address]
have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at
_________ also referred to as Land Use Application No. __ _
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare
approval or disapproval of the property or use but ·merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we)
am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires
Council approval.~
~f L2il<l<1!1£Jt\ d/J ta h ~
Property Owner Date '
Property Owner Date
If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use--
Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 1 o days
prior to the scheduled meeting date.
P.01