HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketThis file contains bits and pieces,
but no complete council packets.
MINUTES
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING -AUGUST 12, 1991
(#10) ZONING FI LE #1665 -THOMAS MCCARTHY
1424 .BALDUR PARK RD
VARIANCES
Gerhardson reviewed the application
Commission's recommendation.
and Planning
Mabusth presented the applicant's ·plans as presented to the
Planning Commission noting that as originally presented, there
was a walkway with an overhang . She explained that the Planning
Commission had no problem with the repair or replacement of the
existing deck, but felt the addition was too ambitious and the
applicant had not proved acceptable hardships. The original
Scheme A reduces the percentage of hardcover by 8% in the 75-250'
zone.
Michial Mularoni, applicant's contractor, explained his
design process and how he arrived at the different var1a~1ons.
He felt that by adding the second garage as depicted in Scheme A,
with overhang walkway to house in the middle to minimize the
fafter height .and thereby reduce the visual impact. He reviewed
one of their concerns which was the covered walk and the need to
provide access to the principal structure for emergency purposes.
Candace Rowlette clarified that the Planning Commission
originally tabled the applicant's request because there was only
one proposal which was inadequate. Applicant then came back and
as k ed to reopen the request, and it ended up being denied.
Jabbour declared that he was at that last Planning
Commission and noted that one Commissioner's reason for denial
was that non-structural hardcover was being replaced with
structural hardcover.
Mabusth reiterated that there is a total reduction in
percentages of hardcover of 7.9%.
Jabbour felt that the garage could be added to the original
garage, centering the garage door between the old and new, and
felt that the rafters wouldn't necessarily have to be extremely
high.
Goetten noted that the lot is 50' wide at the road,
therefore the garage and proposed addition brings it up to 31'4"
which covers a major portion of the lot. The large tree next to
the garage covers a large portion of the remaining setback. She
noted that she could not approve the proposal as is.
Jabbour remarked that a double garage is typically 24' wide
and the scheme proposed is 28'.
Callahan remarked that the hardship of having only a one car
garage is not enough to approve the proposal.
6
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING -AUGUST 12, 1991
tfi@} ioNING FILE #1665 -THOMAS MCCARTHY -cont.
Butler felt that the Council is not there to help in design
and it should be brought back to the Planning Commission. She
also felt the project is too ambitious for the lot.
Mabusth explained that the second time the proposal was
brought to the Planning Commission, applicant amended the
proposal to exclude overhang over the walkway.
Goetten felt that the applicant should look at the whole lot
and see where other removals or changes in hardcover percentages
can be made and also the gazebo should maybe be considered for
removal.
It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to refer
Application #1665 back to the Planning Commission with the
recommendation to the applicant that he work with staff to revise
his request. Ayes 5, nays 0.
(#11) ZONING FILE #1397 -ART CENTER OF MINNESOTA
2180 NORTH SHORE DRIVE
CLARIFICATION OF IMPROVEMENTS
Marty Schneider was present to represent the Art Center.
Gerhardson provided a brief explanation of the request,
noting that they are seeking clarification of the conditions of
the subdivision approval.
Mabusth described the request of the Art Center and
explained conditions of the subdivision in 1989. She noted that
these were specific areas of concern and noted the loading area
to east side of building is also being used for parking. There
is also a gravel access drive and parking area which are not
shown on the original plans for the residential lot. There is a
need to provide applicant with further direction on these areas.
Schneider explained the subdivision was conditional on three
conditions: 1) parking; 2) screening/fencing along north
property line; 3) readjustment of exterior lighting from Hill
School parcel. A $5,000 cashiers check was given to the City to
ensure improvements would be done. Schneider felt that he has
fulfilled all conditions of that developer's agreement and wants
the City to release the cashiers check. He opposed the City
holding the check for other issues outstanding with the Art
Center. Schneider noted that the City feels the fencing is
temporary, however the code does not specify materials to be used
for fencing. The City has required the access to be closed off,
and it has. Schneider explained that the City is now requiring
"appropriate" landscaping where the former parking area on his
property was. He explained that he plans to build a garage there
and wishes to retain the gravel until that time.
7
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING -AUGUST 26, 199 1
ZONING FILES #1606, #1660 & i1a s; = eONf:
Jabbour noted that it is a steep hill and the deck is
actually a launching pad which is very necessary.
It was moved by Butler, seconded by Jabbour, to approve
Resolution #3006, granting a conditional use permit and variance
for day use activities for property located at Record Lots 12 and
19, Big Island and for the reconstruction of the deck within the
0-75' zone; and to approve Resolution #3007 approving the
vacation of the public right-of-way within the subject property.
Ayes 4, nays O.
(#9) ZONING FILE #1665 THOMAS MCCARTHY,
1424 BALDUR PARK ROAD
VARIANCE -RESOLUTION #3008
Thomas McCarthy and his builder, Michial Mularoni, were
present for this application.
Callahan explained that this matter has returned from the
Planning Commission with a unanimous recommendation for approval.
Mabusth noted that applicant's amended plan proposes a
relocated detached garage. She referred to the lot coverage
ordinance exception which states that no matter what size the lot
is, a property is allowed 1,500 s.f. for the principal residence
and garage. The applicant proposes an amended application with
1,499.9 s.f. of total area combined for residence and proposed
garage. The Planning Commission had recommend that the proposal
be amended by removing 31 s.f. of hard~over in order to satisfy
the guidelines of this ordinance exception.
It was moved by Butler, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt
Resolution #3008, granting requested variances to permit the
replacement of an existing deck within the lakeshore protected
area and the construction of a 24'x22' detached garage within the
street yard for property located at 1424 Baldur Park Road. Ayes
4, nays o.
(#10) ZONING FILE #1666 MICHAEL HILBELINK,
2180 PROSPECT AVENUE -
RENEWAL VARIANCE -RESOLUTION #3009
Michael Hilbelink was present for this matter.
Gerhardson noted this is renewal of a variance application
with an amendment to the original resolution noting the placing
of appropriate controls for drainage control have been added to
the resolution and appropriate easement documents have been
executed.
Mrs. Jentilucci, 1295 Briar Street, felt all concerns have
been addressed.
6
VARIOUS PAGES OF COUNCIL ACTION MEMOS
CITY OF ORONO
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
473-7357
APPLICATION NO. 1665
NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
Date of Notice: 8/28/91 --------------------------------------------~------------------------------
TO: Thomas McCarthy
1424 Baldur Park Road
Orono, MN 55331
COPIES:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE OF MEETING: 8/26/91 VOTE: 5 For O Against --------------------------------------------------------------------------~
COUNCIL ACTION -MOTION:
To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution
previously mailed to you.
Per my recent phone call with Mr. Mularoni, we have made the necessary
change for the dimension of the existing lakeshore deck from 7' to 10'
width.
As you propose to construct a new structure on your property, a
revised survey must be submitted with the building permit application
confirming 4' side setback along west lot line and no more than a 3'
setback from the street lot line. The existing lakeshore deck has been
approved for a matching replacement. No additional encroachment in the
lakeshore yard will be approved for the newly constructed deck.
Variance approval is limited to the extent shown on approved plan and
as noted in the approval resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject
to further review by the City. Variance approval expires one year after
date of approval. Permit application must be submitted no later than
August 26, 1992.
lsv
Zoning File #1665
Page 3
Additional Comments and Planning Commission Recommendation -
August 22, 1991
As the intensification of structures on this severely
limited site became the major issue for the review, staff
prepared the fol lowing analysis of existing and proposed
structural improvements in relation to the lot coverage ordinance
as fol lows:
Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 C -Lot Coverage.
Total Area= 8894 s.f.
Allowed= 1334.1 s.f. or 15%
Existing= 1469.95* s.f. or 16.5%
Original Scheme A= 1807.95 s.f. or 20.3%, increase 3.8%
Current Scheme D = 1685.95 s.f. or 18.9%, increase 2.4%
* Principal structure= 971.95 s.f.
Gazebo= 154 s.f.
Garage Areas= 344 or 682 or 560
Exception -Structural area allowed for prinicipal structure
and garage on any lot with less than 1.99 acres per Section
10.01, Subdivision 14 (C).
Allowed= 1500 s.f.
Existing= 971.95 s.f + 344 = 1315.95 s.f.
Original = 971.95 s.f. + 682 = 1653.95 s.f. = 153.95 s.f. or 1.7%
Current= 971.95 s.f. + 560 = 1531.95 s.f. = 31.95 s.f. or .36%
The applicant's consultant, Mr. Mularoni advised that it
would be no problem to meet the 1500 s.f. standard of the code
and would reduce the dimensions of the proposed garage by 1.4'.
The final garage would now be proposed at 24' x 22' with a total
area of 528 s.f.
Final structural hardcover for residence & garage is now:
Allowed= 1500 s.f.
Proposed= 971.95 s.f. + 528 s.f. = 1499.95 s.f.
Lot coverage variance is amended as follows:
Allowed= 1334.1 s.f. or 15%
Existing= 1469.95 s.f. or 16.5%
Proposed= 1653.95 s.f. or 18.5%
Increase of 2% of structure
Zoning File #1665
August 22, 1991
Page 4
The Planning Commission unanimously voted to approve the
multiple variance application as amended based on the finding
that the exception to the lot coverage standard of a 1500 s.f.
allowance for both principal and garage structures have been met.
The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the
approval recommendation of the Planning Commission. The multiple
variances are as follows:
A. Replacement of existing deck (29' 4" x 7')
Lakeshore setback variance
Required= 75'
Proposed = 6 O '
Variance= 15' or 20%
Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 -Hardcover, 0-75'
Area= 3769 s.f.
Allowed= 0
Existing= 316.15 s.f. or 8.39%
Proposed= 316.15 S.f. or 8.39%
B. Construction of new detached garage (24' x 22')
lsv
Street setback
Required= 30'
Existing= 3'
Proposed= 3'
Variance= 27' or 90%
Side setback
Required= 10'
Existing= 1 1/2'
Proposed= 4'
Variance= 6' or 60%
Hardcover variance within 75-250' area
Allowed= 2223.5 s.f. or 25%
Existing= 2408 s.f. or 47%
Proposed= 1834.5 s.f. or 35.7%
Total net reduction of 573.4 s.f. or 11.2 % hardcover
Zoning File #1665
August 16, 1991
Page 2 of 2
Pertinent Ordinances
Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) -
a. Street Setback
Required= 30'
Existing= 3'
Proposed= 3+'
Variance= 27' or 90%
b. Side Setback
Required= 10'
Existing= 1'6"
Proposed= 4'
Variance= 6' or 60%
Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 -Hardcover Variance 75-250'
Allowed= 2,223.5 s.f. or 25%
Existing= 2,408 s.f. or 47%
Proposed with Scheme D, Exhibit F = 1,866.6 s.f.
or 36.4% total net reduction of 541.35 s.f. or
10.6% of hardcover.
Applicants Hardships Statement
Review Exhibit G, original addendum submitted at time of
first review.
Zoning File Jl665
Page 4
Additional Comments and Planning Commission Recommendation -
August 7, 1991
Additional Exhibits -
J -Amended Proposal -Planning Commission Meeting 7/15/91
K -Planning Commission Action Notice
L -Table -Comparing Alternatives for Improvement and
Impact on Hardcover Prepared by Applicant's Consultant
M -Existing Layout and Hardcover
N -Scheme A, Current Proposal
O -Scheme B, Proposed New Detached Two-car Garage
P -Scheme C, Matching Addition to Existing Garage 14'x24'
Applicant's consultant, Michial Mularoni, discussed the
various options considered by property owner for the expansion of
the garage. Mularoni noted that an expansion to the· north side
of the garage would be objectionable to the adjacent property
owner as existing garage is only l½-2' from the side lot line.
All other expansion proposals involve greater hardcover or the
removal of the existing 20" tree that the owner wishes to
preserve. At the Planning Commission meeting of July 15th, the
applicant amended the original plan by removing the proposed
overhang that would have connected the principal structure with
the proposed detached garage resulting in an overall reduction in
the 75-250' setback area hardcover, as follows:
Allowed= 2,223.5 s.f. or 25%
Existing= 2,408 s.f. or 47%
Proposed w/Overhang = 2,086.75 s.f. or 40.7%
Proposed w/Amended Plan= 2,003.25 s.f. or 39.08%
Total Reduction= 404.75 s.f. or 7.9%
The majority position of the Planning Commission held that
the applicant had not demonstrated sufficient hardship to allow
the increase in structural hardcover over existing non-structural
hardcover excesses. The majority felt that the addition was too
ambitious noting that the central portion of the addition was
used for an entrance to the property. Mularoni noted that if
access walk was not provided via the entral location with the
addition to the garage, that a sidewalk would have to be provided
from the parking area along the west side of the garage (review
Exhibits O and P, Schemes B and C). Hardcover can be reduced by
incorporating walking in more centralized location within street
yard.
The minority opinion found the proposal to be acceptable
based on the overall reduction of hardcover within the 75-250'
setback area at almost 8% and the fact that in Minnesota the
average homeowner needs a two-car garage.
Zoning File #1665
August 7, 1991
Page 5
The minority opinion concurred with Mularoni that other
alternatives appeared to have a negative impact on the hardcover.
In the action notice, staff adyised Mularoni that if other
alternatives had been considered by his client, that he should
provide graphic demonstrations of these other plans and their
impact upon hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. Mularoni
has provided two additional schemes for development (Exhibits o
and P) for Council's review.
Scheme A is the current proposal, Scheme B involves the
building of a new detached garage 24'x24' that would no longer be
placed within the substandard side setback area and would result
in the removal of the tree and an overall reduction in hardcover
of 242 s.f. or 4.7%. The hardcover excesses result from the
need to expand the sidewalk along the west and north sides of the
detached garage.
Scheme C proposes an equal sized addition 14'xl4' to
existing garage resulting in a more severe substandard setback to
the street.
Note that the major reduction in hardcover as it applies to
al 1 three schemes involves removal of the gravel parking area
adjacent to the roadway at an existing 849 s.f. Applicant
contends that the additional family car will now be kept in the
stall. Scheme A would provide an additional parking stall on
site because of the offset of the addition. Scheme B will
provide two parking stalls on site. Scheme C results in no
available parking on site.
Council Action -
Provide conceptua 1 direction to staff to prepare the
appropriate resolution for action at the Council meeting of
August 26, 1991. Options are as follows:
Adopt the Planning Commission recommendation approving
replacement of deck within 0-75' setback and deny current
proposal for a 17'4"x20' addition to the existing garage; or
Approve application as proposed based on the reduction of
hardcover within the 75-250' setback area to ensure preservation
of mature tree within street yard; or
Refer back to Planning Commission if current proposal is not
approved and applicant wishes to present an amended plan.
To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley
Orono Planning Commission Members
Acting Administrator Gerhardson
From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
Date: July 16, 1991
Subject: #1665 Thomas McCarthy -1424 Baldur Park Road -
Variances -Referred Back to Planning Commission for
Further Consideration
Zoning District: LR-lC
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A -Site Plan/Existing
Exhibit B -Site Plan Alternative A Excluding Overhang
Exhibit C -Site Plan Alternative B
Exhibit D -Site Plan Alternative C
Exhibit E -Chart of Alternatives
Exhibit F -Site Plan Alternative D Current Request
ExhibitG-Addendum Submitted for Orginial Review by
Planning Commission
Description of Request:
At the August 12th meeting of the Council, applicant
prepared graphic sketches of the other options for improvements
discussed at Planning Comrniss ion. Review Exhibits c & D.
Council concurred with the majority opinion of Planning
Commission and advised that it was the structural intensity of
the improvement that presented the problem and advised applicant
to revise improvment plans for additional review by Planning
Commission. Please note as with the second review at the
Planning Commission the overhang has no longer been included with
the improvement project. The applicant has submitted a revised
plan for Planning Commission consideration. Review Exhibit F,
the current plan involves construction of a new construction of
accessory structure and removal of former. The new garage is 24'
x 23' 4" . In addition to hardcover and street setback
variances, the proposed garage will be 4' from the west lot line,
requiring a side setback variance for new construction. The
gravel area remaining will provide parking for at least one off
site parking stall. Please review comparison chart submitted by
applicant (Exhibit E), note the following structural hardcover
changes with each application.
Existing= 344 s.f.
Scheme A original proposal = 682 s.f
Scheme B = 576 s.f.
Scheme C = 672 s.f.
Scheme D (current request)= 560 s.f.
With the new a 1 ignment of the garage the sidewalk can now be
placed in a straight alignment to the access door resulting in a
decrease in hardcover. The tree can also be retained and the
issue of access to the building is now reduced with the open
corridor on the east side.
EXHIBITS
--
-,,_
0)
0
0
\1
HLS flo. G267 ,\
l. --
I
I
EXISTING
existing deck area
existing house
I
I
I
----. .____ ! I '." --.-..
-t--1
I I I
I C-') '" I
I '°
~ I
I
• I
I
I
Total Hardcover Area
Garage Area
Parking Arna
Sidewalk Area
!>
w ::. w :x:
0
"'
'Iota! Hardcover Reduction X 390 242 350
20"Trec 'fo Be Removed 110
Demo Existing Garage no
yes 110
yes roor
only
\
cxi ting
garage
~RTf
--
Isle Boulevard
--I
I
ALTERNATIVE
I .
I .
I .
I ~r ·~ l
--! -1 "-I--existing deck· area
i ----F=========--=_:_~_----t-4_j ---
.
I .
I .
---------------
.
I .
I .
' .
I .
··iA.·· .
I .
I .
I .
I
..
~
I .
I . • .
I --I ----• I :i; .
I .
I .
I . • 0 .
g !
M I r--. •
-I I •
I I
I i .
I .
I .
I .
I .
I .
I .
I .
I .
I .
I .
I .
I
existing hot.::::e
. ... ,
: ,.
1 7 '-4
..
ti
C')
v
Isle Boulevard
:"i-1
I I • I
! ~ I
! §
I ~
I
::,:•NKII V es• •. :_\.~-~.'• .. : .•.. :_;._
StlU.lrC feet .
~ [" p
w w w :. :. :. w .w w
:i: :i: :i:
0 0 0
"' "' "'
M•'"~~~ ~: E ·~f'~; 'i~
'lotal Hardcover Reduction .,......,., 390 242 350
20"Trec 'lb Be Removed
Demo Existing Garage
• .
I .
I .
I .
I .
I .
I
110 yes 110
no yes ~::::!
---
\
\
--------
I
I .
I .
I .
I
ALTERNATIVE ••13••
i .
I
!, .
I .
I ----.
-§ I
I o
I i g .
r,; I
I'-. •
i r-------1
existing deck' area
----------------
-----
existing house
. . . ~.
...
well
0
l
]
. I
I
I
-----1f;; ~-i-,
+I
0
I
in
(')
! I I
! * I
I ~
I
0
• I
At.:rERNATIVES
DATA
SliU:ll"C fct:t
EMOVE EXISTING 20" HARi WOOD TF'EE & STUMP.
'lotal Hardcover Reduction
20"Trei; 'fo Be Removed
Demo Existing Garage
• .
I
I
.
I . ' .
I
-----
·-·
/
/
I
I
I
r--
1
I
I
I
I
I
I '• .. l::"---
390 242 350
no yes no
roof HO YCS unly
\
~RTI
~~ . ~"" ~=~-~:J, __ J_ii ~ --
--
\ \ I -~, \ . \
RLS No. 6267 · '~ .1
1.4]>---•-· ·-· ----
'
50,00'
24'-0"
28'-0"
Isle Boulevard
10'-0"
\
----------
I
I
I .
I .
AL TERNATIVI! Hen
----. .
-1-----
C>
0
C"'l ,-...
0
··! t
t=e=x=l=s=t=i=n=g=d=e=c=k=·=a=r =e=a=t iI
I
I
I -----,~ --=~
existing house
• • • I . -·.
· .. ~ ..
. ..
Well
0
+I
(')
V
! I I
! ~ I
I ;;;
I
0
I
Total Hardcover Aroa J~~:ili 1057 _1205 1097
Garage Area ·::::3i!f:A: 682 576 . 672
1-----S-~d•_~w-ki•_",:_:_:_:: _ _.I, ::: :: :::
'Iola! Hardcover Reduction
20"Trc~ 'lo Be Removed
Demo Existing Garage
390 242 350
no yes no
nmf 110 yes only
~
0
\
\
.
F
existing
garage
~RTH
I
~'. • ;y...,,.,
\ \ I ·~, \ . \
RI S N 6267 '-' I ' . o. . ~ .:r. -·-· 1 • 4 ~'I -I -■ ■ --28'-0" --
--
32'-0"
Isle Boulevard
'\
. .
I
.
,-r,. I_, 1"1 C: ,··, ·. ,_1 /1 _,,-,= 1 ,,;U,JucUr: ·, 4?.38518
I .
I ..
I .
I
AL.TERNATIV~ ••o••
I . . I . '
F'. 0 3
lo !> p ., "' ..
i :I :,;
" "' = ,: ,:
0 l! 0 .. .,
• --------.... . .
I .
I
.r
exfstfng deck· area ----
$76 672 560
--
~1-. --1 -I .
I .
I .
I .
I -.
§ I I
I :
I ~
-I 0 • ~ I .......
.
I .
I
~ ..
' \ i \ .
----------
exlstfng house
••I••
. ..
well
;.;
.N
. r-
_::, _J
201 250
JSO $2J
• 3fd9Wllk At-■ 11---_ _...:..;,:...:__::_._
,. fol.ii Mardcovcr Rcdu,lion
! 20""1rc<: 'lb Be Removed no "°
""'r ... ,.,,,
1M1,~111
. I Demo l?.~isting C1amge ·=:m!i~~~~::::::Ea.'!:
--.1 I .... ........ • IO
:"i-j
! I I
! ~ I
I § .
I
I .
I .
I .
I ..
\
\
~RTI
--
Rl.S No. 6267 · \.\ I
1.11~-·
__. .,-:..4'.:±:.,jL ___ _::;24:,:.'_-,::.0" ____ ~'-----2-2..::'±;__ ___ -.,c
fsfe Boulevard
Page 6 of 6
p
,,,.,,.
MICHi AL
June 19, 1991
City Council Members
Planning Commission Members
City Staff of Orono
RE: 1424 Baldur Park Road& Crystal Bay
North Arm of Lake Minnetcnka 1 VARIANCE REQUESTS
Variance to Build Garage within 30' Required Setbac~
The hardship and description of unusual property conditions are due to
the following:
1. Extremely small lot and lot width of 50' requires door to face
the road causing the need for 30' setback,
2. Desire to add the ability to park two cars indoors.
3. If we maintained a 30' setback and a 20' depth on the garage, we
would require a setback variance from the house.
4. A 20" hardwood tree is being protected and preserved by not
sliding the garage back any further. Approximately 80% of the
11 root zone arention 11 is being maintained with this proposal.
Hardcover Varience. 75 1 to 250' Zone
The hardship and description of unusual property conditions are due to
the following~
1. The existing lot is small. Even thoug~ the existing house and
accessory buildings are very modest rn size and no plastic
sheeting or fabric has been used or proposed, the 11 Har·dcover 11 is
currently 47%. This proposal w:n reduce that ration to 39.1%
by removing and incorporat'ing the existrng 11 rock 11 p;:rtking
surface and sidewa·ik. Approximately 405 sq. ft. of s·idewalk and
parking surface is being removed and landscaped. The remaining
sidawalks west of the existing single ~ar garage will be
incorporated under the 11 ne\li' roof". The new drive will be
bituminous.
MICHIAL MULARONI
ARCHITECTS & PLANNING CONSULTANTS
7650 Currell Blvd.• Suite 300 • Woodbury MN 55125 • (612)731·2831
City Countil Members
Planning Commission Members
City Staff of Orono
June 19, 1991
Page Two •.
Hardcover Variance, 0-75 1 Zone for Deck Reconstruction
The hardship and practical difficulty and unusual property conditions for
this hardcover variance are as follows:
1. The lot width does not al1ow for the deck to be relocated to one
side or the other.
2. This existing amenity already totally lies within the 0-75' zone
and there is nothing to be done to change this.
3. The request is to reconstruct a weed deck level with the finish
f1oor over the exact existing deck area which is now one step
beelow the finish floor of the house. The existing deck area is
in disrepair and uneven.
All of these above issues would result in undue hardship or practical
difficulty if strict enforcement of the zoning regulations were imposed.
Also, the unusual property conditions noted above prevert compliance with
zoning code requirements.
Thank you for consideration of these applications for variance.
Michial Mularoni, Architect
Tom McCarthy, o~ner
Site oata
Total Site Area
0-75' Area
75'-250' Area
0-75' Existing llardcover
75'-250' Existing llardcover
75'-250' l'roposed Hardcover
8,894 sq. ft.
3,769 sq. ft.
5 I 125 sq• ft• --;;;~;;;;;;~~~=:--'.-316 .15 sq. ft. 8.39% --
2408 0 sq ft 47 o~ :.: ..... .-;:::,_:::-:~-------------· ___ · ·-·----------------.--------.--------._. __ ·_
,oo,:, .,: ft:~::::r~~~i.iii-llffil~
~ •-.~ ~=elevation 929 4' /✓~----_ so.zs• ". , --·
Legal Description
Lot 9, ll lock I , 111\LDUI! PI\IIK,
llcnncpin County, Minnesota
--
@SITE PLAN
SC.
--------· I \ r Y-e.r-e.'(" •t-0 --~ ,
;~ -,I I ,:;;;,t-, I=-Fo,t. ! I
lh:.f-w.._ I du11,.._ .J . -, ...... ,e~
t> r .s 'f'r", +i.. ,...-e
--... .,_ 0 XI B 11 n g de Ck a r 9 8 • ___ i.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::=:::l
I
I
I
------------
existing house
... ..
I
I
• I
---... ! If;; ft--j
! I I
I
0
: 1
:1
~--i --,..,. • I .,,,,
I I / \
• I I \ •✓ ~ --«1---
Isle Boulevard
1: 1 0
~RTH -
,...
IO
d 0 z ,...
u 0)
41 ·o . a: 0
C
• Ill
-9!-i= 0.
~ Q)
]!:
V) 1/)
(I)
o.
C'O
(I) co
'O 0 Ill ·w a: 0
Cl)~ <II
a: L. Q)
>-co C
C .ca.. :i: ..... L.
L. ::,
co 'O >-u-Ill
0 co m
~ID Ill
E~ II)
>-0-.t ..
I-,-(.)
u
41
0 a:
A1
. or
. • 0
g
·l
or
"' 0
"' m
I
"' ...
Ol
U)
>-
:,:
t-
o:
..:
u
0
::.
::.
0
I-
PC PACKET
CITY OF ORONO
P. o. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
473-7357
TO: Thomas L. McCarthy
1424 Baldur Park Road
Orono, MN 55331
ZONING FILE 11665
NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Date of Notice: July 25, 1991
COPIES TO: Michial Mularoni
7650 Currell Blvd.
Suite #300
Woodbury, MN 55125 -----------------------------·----------------------------------------------
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance
DATE OF MEETING: July 15, 1991
NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
VOTE: 5 For 2 Against
The Planning Commission recommended denial based on the finding that
applicant had not provided sufficient or acceptable hardships. The
minority opinion of 2 felt the application~ould have been approved because
of the overall reduction of hardcover of 8% within the 75-250' setback area
and that a 2-car garage is needed in Minnesota.
As we discussed on the phone, staff appreciated your comments during
the review that you have explored other options regarding an addition to
the garage on this severely limited property. You were advised to provide
sketches of the other alternatives discussed at the meeting and to reflect
the hardcover increases resulting from proposed improvements.
If you plan to submit additional supportive information for your
client, please see that it is submitted to this office no later than
Monday, August 5, 1991.
Staff will present your application as amended excluding the overhang
area which now eliminates the issue of access to the well and reduces
hardcover within the 75-250' setback area.
Please contact my office (Jeanne Mabusth -473-7357) if you have any
further questions concerning this application and my comments above.
lsv
To: Mayor Peterson & Orono Council Members
Planning Commission Chairman Kelley
Orono Planning Commission Members
City Administrator Bernhardson
From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
Date: July 1, 1991
Subject: #1665 Thomas McCarthy -1424 Baldur Park Road -
Variances -Public Hearing
Zoning District: LR-lC
Total Area= 8,894 s.f. or .204 acres
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A -Application
Exhibit A-1 -Applicant's Addendum
Exhibit B -Property Owners List
Exhibit C -Plat Map
Exhibit D -Photos
Exhibit E -Elevations
Exhibit F -Survey
Exhibit G -Existing Site Plan
Exhibit H -Hardcover Fact Sheets
Exhibit I -Proposed Site Plan
Description of Request
Applicant seeks hardcover (75-250' setback area) and street
setback variances for a 20' x 17.3 addition to the existing
detached garage. The replacement of an existing lakeshore deck
at approximately 29' 4" x 7' will require approval of hardcover
(0-75' setback area) and lakeshore setback variances. Applicant
also proposes approximately 227 s.f. of structural overhang/roof
at a 5' width and 7' height placed over 143.85 s.f. of non-
structural sidewalk hardcover resulting in additional hardcover
of 83.15 s.f. Review Exhibit I. The overhang/roof connects
principal residence to detached garage.
Pertinent Ordinance-
1. Replacement of existing deck.
(check this section# not clear on tape)
a. Section 10.22, Subd. 1 (B) -Lakeshore setback variance
Required= 75'
Proposed= 60'
Variance= 15' or 20%
b. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 -Hardcover 0-75'
Area= 3,769 s.f.
Allowed= 0
Existing= 316.15 s.f. or 8.39%
Proposed= 316.15 s.f. or 8.39%
Zoning File #1665
July 1, 1991
Page 2
2. Addition to existing detached garage (20' x 17.33' ).
a. Section 10.25, Subd. 6(B)
Required= 30'
Existing= 3'
Proposed= 9'
Variance= 21' or 70%
b. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 -Hardcover variance within 75-
250' setback area
Allowed= 2,223.5 s.f. or 25%
Existing= 2,408 s.f.* or 47%
Proposed= 2,003.6 s.f. or 39.1%
or
Proposed= 2,086.75 s.f. or 40.7%
(depending on Planning Commission's
final determination concerning
connecting overhang roof structure
connecting detached deck with house)
* Does not inc 1 ude landscape area under lain with
deteriorating plastic. Staff has been advised that
applicant will remove prior to Planning Commission
meeting. Staff will reconfirm prior to meeting.
APPLICANT'S HARDSHIP STATEMENT -PLEASE REVIEW EXHIBIT A-1
Street Setback for Detached Garage Addition
1. Substandard lot area and lot width at 50' requires doors to
face road causing need for 30' setback.
2. Need to add addition for parking of two cars. Existing
garage serves for parking only one vehicle.
3. Separation setback would have been required between
principal structure and detached garage if 30' setback was
met.
4. 20" hardwood tree is being protected by not bringing garage
closer to house.
Hardcover Variance -75-250' Zone
1. Lot is severly substandard.
2. Current improvement proposal will result in a reduction of
approximately 8% of hardcover within the 75-250' setback
area.
Zoning File #1665
July 1, 1991
Page 3
Hardcover Variance within 0-75' Setback Area and Lakeshore
Setback
1. Narrow lot width prohibits installation of deck along side
yards of lot.
2. Portions of lakeshore side of principal structure and total
deck lie within 0-75' setback zone.
2. No expansion of deck area is proposed, only replacement of
existing deck.
CITY OF ORONO -VARIANCE APPLICATI0'!/-1-
Initial Application Fee $175.00 7T.
($50.00 per each additional variance)
Renewal Variance Fee $100.00
(no change from original application)
After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee)
PROPERTY LOCATION
Site Address__,_/_l(;.._1 _"{,a____~ __ q'-"'-'11--"'-d-=->-u..,...._~--p _C{."'--'-r __,__\(~R_.,__d.___...;, __
Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) uJ-111-.1..3 3f <Jo/3
Attach legal description to application if not included on
required survey.
APPLICANT Phone (home) --------
Name 1Hv m~<; h, M~d.vfhy Phone (work) 9'tJ. ..... 9do;}..
Address: IL./ ~if /3c1-/d ()J-Po..,,{( e1 City: 0 ('o hO Zip: 55 3 J (
OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) --------
Name Phone (work) ------,,-----
Address: ____________ City: ________ Zip: ____ _
Date Property Acquired 0 / / / q / (month/year)
-A
I I
_____ r_ (do) ~also_own_~~~-~~~~~~~~-:~~~~=~-~=-=~~~~----------------
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
Present Zoning District
Present Use of Property
L R..-Jt_
-----Other (specify)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------00-
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Cm~stru:ti_on Cost $ 3 I SOD -
(!;) lZe tor,s+rt.L<:.+ ~v.,sfr~ d~~k Ol--f'<a,. ,,., D-7~
Descr'be request in d~tail=-------.---~·-~,---.....---....,....------
se-f~o..c.k "<oJte.. G ,4Jd seeoV\d. skh I <j a_t•ct.s,,cz. fo e._~t$ftnJ ~'"'j~ s::bJ, / .,..iA"C\-<:... ... _____________________________________ ([ __________________________ 0 ____ g ___ _
VARIANCES REQUIRED
Lot Area Lot Width ----¥-Hardcover
Setback Variances Front Side Rear)
Other
HARDSHIP
Describe undue har~ship or pr~ctical difficulty res~l}jng from strict
enforcement of zoning regulations: se~ qftClc/tie. J. / < tter
DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS
Describe unusual property cond"tions preventing compliance with Zoning
Code Requirements: s~~ cc c."<,~ el of! c"'
REQUIRED SOBMITTALS
1. Completed Application Form
2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain
this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center
348-3271).
3. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list).
4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include
hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8½"xll" for
reproduction).
5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes
in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8½"xll").
6. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8½"xll").
7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of
any other persons you wish notified of this application.
8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff.
The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please
remember that your variance application is not complete if the above
information has not been included.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide al 1 information required or
requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff
time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses
incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information
supplied is true and correct to the ~esXJo~~er knowled~e. ;·
Applicant• s Signatur~,,,_, -l iNl1:.~ Date t /41w
l I
OWNERS SIGNATURE
The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further
authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants,
agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga-
tion and verification of this request.
Owner's_Signature~ /!.f\'1L~ ______ oate ___ 6ff!/9_/ ____ _
Applicant must have all submittals into t e City offices 25 days before the
Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the
third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled
review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is
unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements t.o have an
authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning
Office of this change prior to the meeting.
June 19, 1991
City Council Members
Planning Commission Members
City Staff of Orono
RE: 1424 Baldur Park Road, Crystal Bay
North Arm of Lake Minnetonka, VARIANCE REQUESTS
Variance to Build Garage within 30 1 Required Setback
E S
The hardship and description of unusual property conditions are due to
the f o 11 owing:
1. Extremely small lot and lot width of 50 1 requires the garage
door to face the road causing the need for 30 1 setback.
2. Desire to add the ability to park two cars indoors.
3. If we maintained a 30 1 setback and a 20i depth on the garage, we
would require a setback variance from the house.
4. A 20" hardwood tree is be'ing prqtected and preserved by not
sliding the garage back any further. Approximately 80% of the
"root zone airr.1.tion" is being maintained with this proposal.
Hardcover Varience, 75' to 250 1 Zone
The hardship and description of unusual property conditions are due to
the f o 11 owing:
1. The existing lot is small. Even though the existing house and
accessory buildings are very modest 1n size and no plastic
sheeting or fabric has been used or proposed, the i'Hardcover" is
currently 47%. This propos~1 will reduce that ration to 39.1%
by removing and incorporat"ing the existing "ro;.:k '' p~rking
surface and sidewalk. Approximately 405 sq. ft. of sidewalk and
parking surface is being removed and landscaped. The t'ernaining
sidewalks west of the existing single car garage will be
incorporated under the "ne\'t roof". The new drive will be
bituminous.
MI C HIAL MULAR ON I
ARCHITECTS PLANNING CONSULTANTS
7650 Currell Blvd.• Suit e 300 • Woo dbur y MN 55125 • (612)73 1 -2 831
fr-1
City Countil Members
Planning Commission Members
City Staff of Orono
June 19, 1991
Page Two ..
Hardcover Variance, 0-75' Zone for Deck Reconstruction
The hardship and practical difficulty and unusual property conditions for
this hardcover variance are as follows:
1. The lot width does not allow for the deck to be relocated to one
side or the other.
2. This existing amenity already totally lies within the 0-75' zone
and there is nothing to be done to change this.
3. The request is to reconstruct a wood
floor over the exact existing deck
below the finish floor of the house.
in disrepair and uneven.
deck level with the finish
area which is now one step
The existing deck area is
All of these above issues would result in undue hardship or practical
difficulty if strict enforcement of the zonin~ regulations were imposed.
Also, the unusual property conditions noted above prevent compliance with
zoning code requirements.
Thank you for consideration of these applications for variance.
Michial Mularoni, Architect
Tom McCarthy, Owner
-I
II
~
-
--
!I
RUN DATE 06/19/91
BATCH 001
PROP ADDR
OWNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/AODR
PROP AOOR
OWNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/AOOR
PROP ADDR
OWNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADOR
PROP AOOR
OWNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
PROP AOOR
OWN.ER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
PROP ADDR
OHNER NAME
"38 08-117-23 34 0013
01424 BALDUR PARK RD
GARY G VINGER
GARY G VINGER
1424 BALOUR PARK ROAD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 08-117-23 34 OOi6
01412 BALDUR PARK RD
CC HAGFORS & KE HAGFORS
CURTIS C HAGFORs·
1412.BALDUR PARK RD
WAYZATA MN. 55391
38 08-117-23 34 0029
00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGN.EO
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING SERVICES
ESTATE OF EDWARD SPINDLER
C/0 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY
7900 XERXES .AVES SUITE 1500
BLOOMINGTON MN. 55431.
38 08-117-23 43 0005
01440 BALDUR PARK-RO
GORDON W TANKE
MR GORDON H TANKE
1440 BALDUR PARK RO
HAYZA'(A MN 55391
38 08-117-23 43 0009.
03520 NORYH SHORE DR
DAVID A SINGER
DAVID A.SINGER
3520 NORTH SHORE OR
HAYZATA MN 55391
TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH QOl 00015
NAME/AODR
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 08-117-23 34 0014
01420 BALDUR PARK RD
HR HITTMER & SK HITTMER
. HALTER R & SHARON K HITTMER
1420 BALDUR PARK RO
HAYZATA MN 55391 .
38 08-117-23 34 0025 ..
00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
EDHARD H SPINDLER .
ESTATE OF EDHARO SPINDLER
C/0 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY'
7900 XERXES AVES SUITE 1500
BLOOMINGTON MN 55431
38 08-117-23 34 0030
00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
.PUBLIC ACCOUNTING SERVICES
ESTATE OF.EDHARD SPINDLER
C/0 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY
7900 XERXES AVES SUITE 1500
BLOOMINGTON MN 55431
38 08-117-23 43 0006
01436 BALDUR PARK RD
H & P NELSON
'HALLACE E NELSON
6221 HASHBURN AVES
MPLS MN ·55423
38 08-117-23 43 0010
03530 · NORTH SHORE DR
AJ'ACKERMANN ETAL
A J ACKERMANN
3530 NORTH SHORE DR
HAYZATA MN 55391
REPORT NO. PI435401
PAGE 1
38 08-117-23 34 0015
01416 BALDUR PARK RD
JC ULKU .
RUBYE & JOHN C ULKU
1416 BALDUR PARK RD
HAYZATA MN 55391
38 08-117-23 34 0028
00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
PUBLIC .ACCOUNTING SERVICES
ESTATE OF .EOHARD SPINDLER
C/0 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY
7900 XERXES AVES SUITE 1500
BLOOMINGTON.MN 55431
38 08-117-23 34 0059
_01428 BALOUR PARK RO
G & H ROTH
GUENTHER R ROTH
4603 ELLERDALE RD
MINNETONKA MN 55343
38 08-117-23 43 0007
01432 BALDUR PARK RD
JG & MR NYQUIST
JOHN G & MAUREEN R.NYQUIST ·
1432 BALDUR PARK RD
HAYZATA MN 55391
38 08-117-23 43 0011
03540 NORTH SHOR~ OR
DOLORES M PETTIPIECE
DOLORES M PETTIPIECE
3540 NORTHSHORE DR .
HAYZATA MN 55391
II
-
-
RUN DATE 06/19/91
BATCH 001
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OHNERS LIST
REPORT NO, PI435401
PAGE 2
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE
REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS ~ATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BE
OF. t1Y KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF.. . ~,· '0 o·c&,·o/ y~ DATE ___ ,_I BY ,i , ✓
>
NORTH ·, ARM {)P; -/17-Z .>-
1 '
\
t-
I: 1 I,.
---,
\
\
l
\
\
\
--__ . __ ------"\ --~----~---
\
\
\
\
\
\
'\
'\
'\
'\
'\
\ (34)
\
\
\
I
I
I
I
I
r ?:, t;,
'
' ' "\
' ' ... 1
I
I
AUD SUIID I
110 273
•
D
\
en U>
o'O ~ . C: P r o p. e r t Y L I n e
--t
::r:
m r-
m
<
l> 3 --t· ,---0 I+
z t=:=========~=========:z::=:=j
□□□□
f-CD □□□□ ~.~ □□□□ ;· □□□□
. Property L Ina
I
lL\
JS'-o'''t:
-
@WEST ELEVATION
I/ Sc. 1/4"1'-0"
new garage
z..:>'-0"
j
l lj
1 ,i
e XI st.
4'-o''
~
...-:::2: ,c; :::,, :3;:;---_ / / ~ -::::=::::3s;~------::--::::: ~r v t ::::::-,::---, -. '
□ □ 11-----------;
□ □ 11--------t
□ □ lil--------t
new garage
,~s· l"'r '. 2." )7'-""t-"
ffi_ NORTH ELEVATION
I/Sc. \[SJ 1/4"1'-0"
I '1'-,~.:t
'\
' \
!
1
-------------------------~F
I hereby certify that this is a lru~ and correct representation of
a survey of lhe boundaries of:
Lot 9, Olock 1, OALDUI~ PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
And of lhe location of all built.lings, if any, thereon, and all
encroachmenls, if any, from or on :.;aid land. As surveyed by me
lOl11 day of August, 1902.
visibl~
this
%£~, ~/ .. f ✓:,;)./4-c;,_<.~.-
Thomos S. Bergquist frY
Registered Land Surveyor, Minn. Lie. No. 7725
.-··~·· '·· •. •. SATHAE-BEAGOU 1ST, INC.
..:__--: H . -------------
·:;.__· ' 1l, (Alt WAYlAfA ■LVO • ~-'flAtA, MN IIJ•1
TlllPHONl 111_.Jl-0141
,c .. u
"=30' d~ .. u-. 17 33
m: "°· S5Z. 7-I
Prepared for:
Stanley Sorensen
Site Data
Total Si tc Arca
0-75' Area
75' -250' Arca
8,894 sq. ft.
3,769 sq. ft.
5,125 sq. ft.
0-75' Existing Hardcover
75'-250' Existing Hardcover
316.15 sq. ft. 8.39% ------_----:: ___ --__ ,._ --_;'_=---=~
47.0% =-::;:::;::~;::;::::;::::-:::-::::-::=:;:;::-::;:::::::-:::;:::::-:::-::':'::'::;'~
I +I
!:'!
! --/if'-----50,25• ··!~ ..__ -------..... -----~ \ I --~ I ! I I
Legal Description
l.ot 9, II lock l, 111\LDUII PIIUK,
llcnnepin Counly, Minnesola
\ I I \ ..
ltlS No, 6267 '-\
1.4]'..:::: --
@SITE PLAN
SC.
----
existing deck area
------------
! I
I
I
I
..__ --I fo
"!-t-j
! I I
! ~ I existing house
I ~
!
e XI ting
9 a r age !(---i -...,.
• I ~-
I I / \
j / / \
;1./ -----
Isle Boulevard
1: 1 0
~RTH -
G
...
(0
d 0 z ...
v m
.'IL
0
ct
UI
C
0
Q)
0,
C'O
Q) (0
'00 ·w a:
Q)~ a: ....
>, (0
.ca.. ........
.... ::>
(O'O o-
0 al
L m
E~
0-<t 1-,-
u
<l>
0
ct
(II
0
UI
Cl)
C
C
::i:
>,
(II
m
(II
(/)
>,
0
.
a
A1
0 z
t a:
!
0
N
a
N
a,
' "' '<I'
a,
"'
<D
>-
r
l-
a: ..
u
0
::;;
::;;
0
I-
HARDCOVER rnLCULA TI mLWOBKSHEET
~ETBACK ZONE: (c IR CLE ONE)& 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000'
EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A, HousE __ 2____.9._:_3_ X __ , ___ = __ · 2_G_/._3 __ S,F,
LENGTH WIDTH
__ 2_-_c._f ._· __ 3_ X CJ X • > = /'1/ ,8:5 S,F,
_____ X _____ = _____ S, F,
-----X -----= -----s. FI
_____ X _____ = _____ S, F,
B, GARAGE ---D---X -----·--= __ __ S,F,
C, DRIVEWAY -----
D, SIDEWALK ____ _
E, PATIO/
DECK I/
F,LANDSCAPE ____ _
AREAS
UNDERLAIN
BY
PLASTIC
SHEETING
/ .
( c-.. n\2.£ so)
G, OTHER II
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
_____ = _....;_;._ . ..:..n:...-----s. F.
= S,F,
-----= __ -_~"""'o_-_· _ S,F,
-----= _____ S. F.
c,, --'---= _____ /_I_I __ S,F,
-1 --=---= __ ... 1_~_,:f __ S • F •
. -0 -------= _____ S,F,
_____ = _____ S, F,
_____ = _____ S,F,
_____ = _____ S,F,
14 = 15'1 S,F,
-------------
ToTAL HARDCOVER IN ZoNE
!_50.is· X 7 5"') ToTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ....,
3/l,./!!:
~,,1
S,F,
S,F,
X 100 = t,.;.; ;, L1 ( .. ) ., ...,,., l
19
0
Ci]
%
06/18/ 991 12 1 07 FROM EXXON CHEM WOODBURY H) 47305Hi
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET=··--
P.04 ~
250-500' 500-1000' SETBACK ZONE: (C!l~CU£ ONE)
EXISilNG HARPCOVER lN ZONE Proposf!d E.xJsf g·
A, · Hauss X ____ ~ ·::z4z.,~[: S,F, .,,'f 1-2.")$,f!.:,
LENGTH WtDiH
X -----= -----S,F •
..
X -----$,F,
X _____ "'" _____ S,F,
B. GARAGe
D,. SIDEWALK
~OH1'"$TCCl'
~~
X
~7.c,7 x 3.S
;r:.c · s-.. 6
6\l-e.t.._L.tt..,
"l'IHl p
-1 • 0 . . X 4t .. .e> ,,,.
5 .,.. 4.3 C. ol.1$ I I-/.-.-+ fl _. ::,.
~ ~ ":; 1~ =
E, PATIO/
DECK ..... C) ,,,.. _____ X _____ _,,,.· .;__, _____ S.F.
P,l.ANOSCAPE _____ X ____ __ __ ...... _o~--S1F,
AREAS
UNOERLAUi BY _____ X ------"'" _____ S, F,
PLASTIC
SHEETING
G. OTHER
...,....._,_ ___ X _____ = _____ S,F,
_____ X _____ = _____ S,F,
_____ X _____ = . _ ?•F•
---~----...ii==----
TOTAL HAROCO.V-ER IN Zom::
' ...
ToTA~ PaoP~RTY AREA !N ZoME 5', I 25. () ., I " -S,F,
P:r o.;p q g.;,e,J.( [lj ~.0 ~} ~ ~--¼ ~ $l~· ~ F x 100 ~ __;;;._.;..._ ___
::E .~r'tS:t i.:n g. ,.. IB) -~ tl ~~ ·. o __ & • ., ti g e z.:s , ... ~ 'I-I oo -=-·~--"
19
Site o'ata
Total Site Area
0-75' Area
75'-250' Area
0-75' Existing Hardcover
75'-250' Existing Hardcover
75'.a250' P,r.,;iposed llardcover
Legal Description
Lot 9, Block I, B/ILOUll P/lllK,
llcnnepin County, Minnesota
--
@SITE PLAN
SC.
I ----. -1---
t
ex Is tin ,.g_d_e_c_k_' _a_r_e_a-, j
----------
I
J
I
I
I
-----I~ ":t-1
existing house
..
..
>
0
ext ting
garage
Isle Boulevard
1: 1 0
I ,I I
ii1 I
~
.,__ __
. " ! / "",,_,_
I I I \ • I I \ v~ -·-
~RTH -
Qb-1 .. "~
J
-,)) ~
d z
u
QJ ·o a:
C
• ClJ _g;_
...
(J)
0 ,..
O>
;::a.
.; Q)
QJ-,e•-
v, UI
u
QJ ·o a:
✓ < . .
I I
"' N
"'
0 z
~ a:
<D •
; :I
m • 0 a:
m
!
0
A1
N
0
"' Ol
I
N ...
Ol
N
<D
►
J::
l-
a:
<(
u
0
::..
::..
0
I-
Site Data
Total Site Area
o-75' Area
75'·250' Area
0-75' Existing Hardcover
75'-250' Existing llardcover
75'-250' Proposed Hardcover
.. --~ '-_, '
--------
' i
i'
I
i
! I
--! I~ '"t1'j
e11l•lfn11 houae
! I I
! ~ I
Legal Oescrlpllott
tot !1, lllock I, UM.lllJII PIIRK,
Ucnnapin County, Minnesota
I .
i , ..
i
l~ew . . ...
\\! '1s-.,
RlS llo. 6267 \\I \ -• 1 .. 4~---·.t•-· ---
@SITE PLAN
SC. 1: 10
: ..
Isle Boulevard
I ; i i I
I
i ~ i ~-... ! I 'It~ OijTH
I I / \ i ,1 ' .. ;,~__,.--
-; I
. ,
Al: /
~;/~
.. .
~ (D
0 ..
ti 0,
·~
a'.:
C:
• Ill .s1-i= a.
~ di
111 .. 111_ o; en
.
Q)
o.
C't:1
<I> as
"00 ·;;; a:
(I) ..'I:: a: ...
>-(0 .cc.
-L. ... :::, as -o u-0 ('(I
::lE CD
E~
0-¢ .,_,_
...
I.I .9!.
2
Q.
ca -0
Ill
G)
C:
C:
:I
..
(.)
. , . , , .
: ... -.
. .
.
.
• -•
.
i
1
I< .
A1
N
..
'°
:c
>--
II:
C
(,)
u
.:1:
:I
0
MICHi AL ASSOCIATES
ALTERNATIVES " al (.) -<{
CJ =
z LJJ LJJ LJJ
I-~ ~ -~
LU . LJJ LJJ (/) :c :c :c
DATA X 0 0 0 UJ (/) (/) (/)
square feel
Total Hardcover Area 1447 1057 1205 1097
Garage Area 344 682 576 672
Parking Area 849 193 364 144
Sidewalk Area 254 182 265 281
Total Hardcover Reduction 390 242 350
20"Trcc To Be Rc111ovcd no yes no
De1110 Existing Garage no yes roof
only
MICHIAL MULARONI
ARCHITECTS & PLANNING CONSULTANTS
76'i0 Currell Blvd.• Suite 300 • Woodbury MN 55125 • (612)731-2831
REMAINING FILE DOCUMENTS
ARCHlfECrs .lo
PROJECT: \L\2 '-\
TO: 1:rE htJfJf:. MA Bv.sn+ 7
c.,;{1 o-f Or o ~ 0
L:!! 47 ~ -OS-( o _j
ATTN: __ '"""""""v-=E-'-'-M ___ 'IJ_t;..=r-"-------
WE TRANSMIT:
(612)731-2831
DATE: '7 ...J 3 ° -c, l
PROJ. NO.: 91 o~ ·)
• herewith .0 under separate cover via _____ _ e in accordance with your request __________ _
FOR YOUR:
0 approval
0 record
THE FOLLOWING:
• distribution to parties O information
0 review & comment 0 other _____________ _
• drawings 0
0 specifications 0
0
product literature
samples other _____________ _
COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION
\ £ )(.I STI /J ~ c; ITE" PLMV
..
' .•. S. C ff-e-" E.. tp/
\ s l.H--E...M. f.. I e, \
.
' ~ C. I+ S--M E_ •e, \
REMA:KS: ··············-;-·····;;,(e···············~····~·~·_i>._. ...... i ....... ~ .. fiJ·······:~·-r:(~·+;;;·~ ..... I?.le ... S. .. ~ ......... Cal ....... _ ................... A .. S ........ , ............. f .............. ..f. ..... l .. ~ ............... .
... .-.i.s .. -..... Y.f.\.kk.a.c .... ~:: ... ,.J ...... '1fM ....... f.\f.f!.q,.: .. M~r:.~ .. ~ ........ I:.ilf/.r.~.~,~,,a.k .. .
:·;:-;i;1Jlv..c._h-~.f p. .... !N.:1 •• fb.; .... ih,.'L .. IY.lt1-fk.C. .. : .... ~M······················-·-········
~~-.............. _ ......................... -.~~--·:·;;;: ..... !•·-······ .. ,,·•.•······ .. ············· .. ···//..p~----:'! ..................... ~ ............. .
. . . . ..... ...... ....... .. . . .. ................. ... ........ .. . . . . . .. . . ... ....... ............... .. ················ .. ····· ............................. .
COPIES TO:
7650 Currell Blvd, Suite 300 Woodbury MN 55125
07,,30/1991 1313 !FROM EXXON CHEM WOODBURY HI 4730510 P.02
ALTERNA'TlVES ~ ~ b
(!} " z UJ UJ U1 -:E ~ .~ I-LtJ .w LtJ (/) :t J: :r
DATA )( 0 0 0 ~ V, VI. (/J
sq1,1arc feel
Total Hardcover Area 1447 1057 1205 1097 .
Garage Area 344 682 576 672
Parking Area 849 193 364 144
Sidewalk Area 254 182 265 281
lbtal Hardcover Reduction 390 242, 350 . .
20"Trcv To Be R cn1oved no y~s no
~
Dcn10 Existing Garage no yes roof
ooly
M!CHIAl • MULARONI
ARCHITECTS & PLANNING CONSULTANTS
7t1'iO . Currell Blvd. '" Suite 30!) • Woodbury MN 5$125 • {b1:?)73i·2831
CITY OF ORONO -NOTICE
The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Council
Chambers at 1275 South Brown Road on Monday, July 15, 1991 to
review the following land use applications:
1. #1656 Donald L. Meyer of 485 Park Avenue seeks approval of
a side setback variance for a proposed addition to the west
or rear side of the existing residence.
2. #1658 Lyndon s. "Bill" Stubbs owner of the property located
at 255 Fox Street has applied for a renewal lot area
variance to permit construction of a new residence.
3. #1660 Big Island Incorporated, owners of Record Lots 19 and
20, Big Island, has applied for a conditional use permit and
variance application for permission to reconstruct a
swimming dock that exceeds an allowed width of 4' to be
installed within the 0-75' lakeshore protected area.
4. #1662 Richard and Collette Roberts of 1937 Fagerness Point
Road have applied for a lot area and lot width variance in
order to rebuild a new residence structure.
5. #1664 William H. Beckmann of 1090 Loma Linda Avenue has
applied for hardcover and average lakeshore setback
variances to allow the reconstruction of a lakeside, grade-
level deck.
6. #1665 Thomas McCarthy of 1424 Baldur Park Road has applied
for hardcover, lakeshore setback and rear setback variances
to al low the reconstruction of a lake-side deck and to add a
second stall to the existing garage.
7. #1666 Michael Hilbelink, who has an interest in the property
located at 2180 Prospect Avenue, has applied for a renewal
lot area and side setback variance to permit the
construction of a principal residence on the undeveloped
property.
8. #1667 Whitney MacMillan, who has an interest in the
property located at 1700 Fox Street, has applied for a
variance to the "clean fill" standard that would allow
debris from the foundation of the former residence to be
buried on site.
Al 1 persons wishing to be heard wi 11 appear at this time. The
meeting starts at 7:00 PM. Written comments are solicited.
Plans are available for review in the City offices by
appointment.
City of Orono
By: Planning Commission
Jeane A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
To be published the week of July 1, 1991.
CITY OF ORONO -NOl lCE
·. :The Pia~rirnii" C:i;mi ss i~n will hold
·public hearings fn 'the Co.uncil 1ambeis at
. 1275 South Brown·:Road on Mo ay, July 15,
'1991 _"fo ·review the followin land use
applications: ,,-_:, .· ·•·. -. . · :· ·
. 1 .#1656 Donald L. Meyer f 485 Park
-:-Av1:nue .see~ __ approval o( '.a .s 1 e setback"· --j_,,
· .. variance for a proposed add1non tjthe west or
/rear side of the existing residence. ~ ' .. ~
--· · 2. #1658 Lyndon S. ·em• SU\l,bs owner
·. of the property !9_cated at 255 Fox\51reet has
, applied_Jo r,,·a r!i'newal lot are!', v•nance ~
. permit construcnon of a new res1derce . ,, .
,.... •-· -3 . #1660 Big -Island Incorporated ,
-~ow"riers of Record Lots 19 and 20, ~ig Island,
--~has applied for a conditional use ~r'!lit and
~ variance applicati on for perm1u1on to
--reconstruct a sw imming dock that exceeds an
:. allowed width of 4' to be installed witl\in the (?-
-c 75' lakeshore protected area. · · · •\· ; '._'.'. _
-,~ti,~.,.~ 4. #1662 Richard and Collene R9berts of
,:1937 Fagerness Point Road have applied for .,t a lot area and lot width variance .in order to
i1rebuild a new residence structure. .J . .:::. i?.~s:.-.:,f 5. #1664 .William H. Bockmann (!f 1090 .
c:, Loma Linda Avenue has applied for ~al'!lcover . ·
~'and average lakeshore setback van~s to
. ·allow the reconstruction of a lakeside, sirade-
_Je deck. -... :( _.,_;;;;:. 1 l:i:~ \f.-,;,, r~;. .-1 '! :~
.,., 6 . •1665 Thomas McCarthy of 142_4
Baldur Park Road has applied for hardcover,
lakeshcire setback and rear setback variances
·10 allow the reconstruct ion of a lake-side. ~eek
and to add a second stall to the ex1s11ng
garage.··-· -· · ·•-,· -, .. \ · ·
· --7. #1666 Michael Hilbelink , who has an
interest in the property located at 2180
Prospect Avenue, has applied for a renewaHot
area and side setback variance to permit the
· construction .. of a principal residence Qn the
,·und e":'.0'13:Sr~r:~y ·M:-:Mi;~n.-~J ~:s .
• an interest in the property located at 1700 Fox
" Street, has applied for a variance ~ the 'clean
__ · fin• standard that would allow· debns from the
-ffoundation of .the former __ residence ·to _be
buried on .site. !"'•·:·:i:: -~-:,+bt:,,• 'i'--,:.-_ · , :
·;,:._ .. ,•'All persons wishing ·10 _ be heard will
,appear at this time :The meeti~Q starts m 7:00
p.m.,Wrinen comn:ients. are soho.ted. Pl_ars are
available for review in the _ City officu by
·r:i~t~~~if ;--~~~:~rJit· { -·:. i:
0 8y: Planning C9mmi~ion ,.;__,.,;;;,~~.:.--."' , ,i;~ _
.-. ·-~ : :,_::~_;_~'!.;.~--·--,.;.~--
..•.. ",-,;:_: "_. -;: ___ . :-____ : ·-;:Jeanne MabLSth, -
·· ---~, ·~ ~ ·. ··_:_...,:.-·Building & Zoning Adminis~tor
~(;'~g~;~~-~n7'1ie ·~
2
k~;~~d Pio~~~Jul~ft .·
1
~m1i . .;,~;--,;~~· . ~~Jl:fil~~,~-. : ~
:---:. ·;t:".; ·/ ·:·:.;..::~.:..-.::. ,: .... _:_"',...:,_~~--, + ,.J..,. ·1
Affidavit of Publication
State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin .
8111 Holm, being duly sworn, on oath says that he is
an authorized agent and employee of the publisher
of the newspaper known as THE LAKER . Mound, Min -
nesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are
stated below :
A.) The newspaper has complied with all the require-
ments constituting qualifications as a qualified
newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute
331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as
amended.
B.) The printed
which is attached was cut from the columns of said
newspaper, and was o/nted and published once each
week for • successive weeks : I
It was first published Mo
the J..El_ day of
and was thereafter pririi d
Monday, to and including
the __ day of · _______ _ 19_;
MA RIETTA A. STRAUS
NOTARY PUBLIC
CARVER COUNTY
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 3-1-96
Authorized Agent
~ 1ubsrbed and sworn to me on this
I., day of t\,14 I 19!ll.
By : ~o >,.,~ 0, ft=~
t Notary Public
Rate Information
( 1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for com para•
ble space: '10.40 per inch.
(2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matte<: $10.40 per inch .
(3) Rate actually charged for above matter: $5.48 per inch .
Each additional successive week: $3.66 per inch
$He Data
Total Stte Area
o~75' Area
75,;,z50• Area
o~75' ExisHng Hardcover
75'-250' £xisti!l9 Hardcover
75'-250' Proposed ttardcover
FROM EXXON CHEM WOODBURY
• I i
J i s ti
11;
I I • Is! i:i!
i !
I !
l I
i
i
i
i
i i
i
i
!
I
i l
!'.El•-l!"iS"ll!\<;SltC-i \ t~ ~('\,HliJ .
l.t,gal l)t>l!ICl'lptlon
l.ot !1, l!lo;;k l, !ll\Ulllll l'Ml<,
licn11a1lin County, Him1ai;ot11
--
----:,-,.....
TO 4?30510
---
.... lit
; •. e: . "' : .. ,: ~
•,. -~ ...
• >
9
j
i i.
i
I
f I
--! til. '1'1-j
! ! I
! 31 ' I :; t
i i i r
{ I
I
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
!
!
!
!
I
i i .
i
i
i
~-¼ I I..,..,. • ,e,
I ! t \ • I 1 v~_.;;t,,-
lisle B:0ulev11r<1
P,07
~
ti ... 'o 0,:
...
(0
0 .....
0,
. . J . ~ 1
t i .
A1
N
TO 473051 ~1 P.08
FROM E~%0N CHEM WOODBURY ,.
I hereby codify thqt lhis ls o lruie ond correct repre:senlolion of
o svrvey of the boundaries of:
Lot 9, Glock ), OAU)OR PARK 1 Hennepin County, Minnesota.
And of lhe location of all buildinijs, if ony., lhereori# and oll visible
enc.rom.::hmenl~, H ony, frOf!l or on told land. As surveyed by me this
10th dot of August, 1902.
S A T HR E ~ P E·A G Q U ! ST, J l\i C. ---------,-.--•~
Thomo~ S •· .Ucrgquist .•· . ~--..., + •
Registered lond Surveyor, Minn. Lie.
Ptep.orcd for:
Stanley Sorensen
J-
No. 7725
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss.
)
CITY OF ORONO )
I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing
concerning the matter of #1665, was mailed to the attached list
of property owners.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal
this 26th day of June, 1991.
Jamie Bosfji
MARS -GABRIEL
LAND SURVE\ORS, INC.·
30-30 Harbor Lane No.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Phone: (612) 559--0908
1.1i
.· I & I-
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of
the booodaries of the above described land and of the location of aN buildings.
If any . theteon, and al visible encroactments. if any, from or on said land.
/
/
File No.
Book -Page
26 2 -24
.,/
::;.'
i.EGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 9, Block 1, BALD
o Denotes iron monument
Denote·s offset stake
x 000.0 Denotes existing elev .
(000.0) Denotes proposed elev.
----+ Denotes su-face drainage
Proposed garage floor elev.=
PREPARED FOR
PARK, Hennepin County, Minneota.
Proposed lowest floor elev.=
Proposed top of foundation elev.=
BENCHMARK:
ToM McC4RTI-IY
--~~ -~