HomeMy WebLinkAbout#01-2669 Recorded Resolution 46467475893
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 4 6 4 6
A RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES
TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 (B), AND
SECTION 10 .56, SUBDIVISION 16(L)(2)
FILE NO. 01-2669
'WHEREAS, Richard J. Wett and Marge A Wetl , husband and wife, (hcrcinQft er
"the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 1396 Baldur Park Road. within the City
of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows:
Lot 16 , Baldur Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS , the applicants have applied to the City for an after the fact variance to
Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L)(2)
to allow 3,555.83 s .f. (36.3%) hardcover in the 75-250' setback area where 3,555 .83 s .f. (36.3%)
exists and 2,452 s.f. (25%) is allowed to permit construction of a four foot overhang over an existing
sidewalk on the street side of the residence :
WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning
C ommission held a public hearing on April 16, 2001 , at which time all persons desiring to be heard
concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon.
NO'W, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #01-2669.
2 . This property is located in the LR-1 C Zoning District, where .5 acre or 21,780 s.f. is
the minimum lot area . The property consists of approximately .31 acres or 13,670
s .f.
3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 16, 2001 and
recommended approval by a vote of 5 to 0.
Page 1 of 5
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. ' 4 6 4 6
4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact:
A. The structural coverage on the lot is increasing from 1,892 s.f. (13.8%) to
1,996 (14.6%), still below the allowed 15% by City ordinance.
B. The hardcover in the 75-250' setback zone is not increasing, it will remain at
3,555.83 s.f. (36.3%).
C. The lot is undersized for a lot in the LR-1 C zoning district.
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to
it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting
the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire
hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a
convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship
or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants;
and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and
Comprehensive Plan of the City.
6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by
the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and
welfare of the community.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants an after
the fact variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) and Section . .
10.56, Subdivision 16 (L)(2) to allow 3,555.83 s.f. (36.3%) hardcover in the 75-250' setback area
where 3,555.83 s.f. (36.3%) exists and 2,452 s.f. (25%) is allowed to permit construction of a four
foot overhang over an existing sidewalk on the street side of the residence. Approval is subject to
the following conditions:
1. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants attached to this
resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan may require further
Planning Commission and City Council review.
Page 2 of 5
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 4 6 4 0 ·,
Authorities granted by these variances run with the property not with the applicants,
but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit
within one year of the date of Council approval, or these variances will expire on that
date (April 23, 2002).
3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of these
variances shall constitute a violation of the zoning code , shall automatically terminate
any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
4. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of
this resolution and on behalf of themselves , their heirs, successors and assigns,
hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property.
Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 23rd day of April, 2001 by
Barbara A. Peterson and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota
Page 3 of 5
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 4646
municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
:. MARY ANN JOHNSON
NOTARY PUBLIC· MINNESOTA
My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2005
ST A TE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this ,3 c~f-h day of .If;? I<.,-/ , 2001 before me a Notary Public within
andforsaidCounty,personallyappeared /2 1f'c_,hqtft:( sL· i,,Jefi qv>"l /YIA-121-e. /}-, UJefi; J/Y/q,ee:""e
✓
known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.
i'f~~NSON
· NOTARY PUBLIC -MINNESOTA
My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2005
i•", ,e~ea~~·kx~:3<-~~
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
Notary Publi~ ./
On this ______ day of ___________ , 2001, before me a Notary
Public within and for said County, personally appeared ______________ _
______ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.
Notary Public
Page 4 of 5
' .
·:.
\
' .....
\
\
I '>
I ;
', /
\' --~-· ,
\, \ ,.)
I ·, _ _,
7 'Q
~
--. -----·· ... -..... ------Exhibit A
LAKE
---
8/\LDUR
•.:p1 ·\ \ t \. ,1\" !,, •,11,·vc\' lu \p1t'\ 11. · •. 1•\\f'I
l)I \_111 \I;. \;.1l•llli" \'ill°\-
1\P•lll "l'ill Cn1111I V. l•\illll'!?,111 ,I
MINNETONl<A
.. ,1 .• JC' ,, ;, !
.•.JI ... ,.,, I
.
" ''
' : ,J ' .,✓
~ .
'4.0d ,,
~~
PAR\< ROAD
.,1JJt .,
~
I hP.-ehY certlfY tnat t h\S \S ij
t,r11P. illl<l correct represe11tat\011
of a survey of tne boundar\eS uf ,~t \6, na\rtur p11rk, "ennep\n
i:111111!.Y, Hinnesotn. 111111 the \uc11t\u1
ol' 1111:t •J1.! sting 1111\ \dings thereon.
I I. c\u!?5 1111\. purport to silo, .. any
111\11•1· \vqi:•11-,1imnnt.s or encroach·
·,111•11\ •. ·•
Page 5 of 5
1'\ I . t\ \ I~
. 11;1l!!
II
\li!l.ll!II
--·-1J1--·-
(. "''.o} -~
L
'" -~~o i' -?.~-11'.I, r~.-. 7.,,.,,
\ 1•1,n m.1rl:1~t"".----•
H•~~II :;ea I P.'lel
f.:,.\st.\llY contour·
s11ot e\e.,at\on
/'r4~,r~rl Cflll/"'-''
''
\.
\
\'
\ \ ··, .. :
\-
\
' \
\
\
\
L
\
'('
t
'
' I
i l:.
,·
~
\
i
\.
\
\. ,_
\'
I · \ .
\
\ ,,
,: r
-\ t t
.l.\ ,,
.,·
\
~ r t ~.
\
I \t-
7475893 ·
1,,... : ~ '. ~'
OFF ICE OF C01J HTY Rf.COliOER .
tlEH NEP IH COUNTY, MINN ESOTA
I
cm f !FIEIJ F!lf::o ANO OR 7 REGOP.OED ON
•• J .•I
01 rAY 22 PH ,3= 4~
, -,, ·-,~•·u~JJ T t"",J4..-,5~9'l .n.:..:. l h ;~•)r ;r..., ~ I .._.,,, U
:?t.1;,,1J~~lliL'f.•J/JI,. •• · co. REC. ·-1#/2
~DEPUT'f
'"'•""'•···\ ': ... ! : "°'-> ,~. ·: >.,,-~..,. -• :.-,,,, · --t
fs ,..:v-L/X} 1
11"'1""'111r ..... ,~••----" 1 , • -•,•?-O •;:' ... , M '11t"i='
Metro Legal Services Inc:
U' (' 1 ·J. Box 491 . ,, . ..,·
n\{\,vv~ /·