Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketCITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATIONIj Initial Application Fee $150.00411, .� ($50.00 par each additional v e) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 '�✓ (no change from original application) After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee) CITY C ;%',�L' ----------------------------------------------------------- FLOW 11-IFFNE PROPERTY LOCATION 13MAV-000 N �A � 1'Z � 01 ,FN M. �Ei Site Address -7 l- D . �P L �F'PT - nANA YGU Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ��, I ! l" L3 `3 (- 791,1 Cmj R(}1 *j.;;41 Please check one - Property'- abstract or torrens? 041"wo Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. _ ------------------------------------( APPLICANT Phone (home) ` y -_.` � l------- Name '1g, N V ) c ( t4l;�Phone ( work) `t �}- ' c1 6 e- Address: `� fl h^ E- City: ,/ Zip _ ..- , t --------------------------------------------------------------------------- OMMSR (if different than applicant) Phone ()some) Name Phone (work) Address: Date Property Acquired City: Zip: (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PREBSMT OSR OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District G Present Use of Property rOim (L-"( (W SNDf�� Residential Other (specify) D@9CRIPTIOM-OF R IUMT - - Estimated Construction Cost Sri4 d-Z!,0 Descrite re oast it detail: 1 t.-t�1 �'-'��1'L 7 04/VI AA Lot Atr ----- ----- --- ----------------------------------------------------------- •ARI.RMCRB MWIRM Lot Area Lot width _ _ _ Hardcover Bethacs Variances t Front Side Pear) /Ato v HARDS H I P Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from st ict 1-0 enforcement of zoning regulations: cXl� T, ;" ' % / '-(-AT/4 �l %� ✓ /AG(. y st� /�f' fii /' l� 5,' 2 c" p v� i 0 t%. /T C N-r- c A )V L ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual propert conditions preventing compliance with 'Zoning T ,J Code Requirements: / � -,a. V f � � i,✓i 5 REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed application For:, 2. Certified ?roperty Owners List o, owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin Count;: Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Stamped, legai sized envelopes (/10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) ;f any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Applicant and Property Owner must sign tt.is application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Certificrtion by Zoning Department that Variance .Npplication is complete. Zoning Official's Signature Date AMICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature j �i� f / Date AIMS S I GNATURR The owner hereby ackowledges and agreer� to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto they property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga- tion and verification this reggost. / 1 � owner's Signature Date -��----------------- ----�J----- ---- ----- -- Applicant must have all submittals into the City c`ficer 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetir,gs are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be presen- at a t 1 scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is RnaDle to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma:Ke arr3ng,ments to have an authorized agent &:tend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ,i DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with M.S. 15.165, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential inform- ation. You are notilied that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to Determine your qualificacion for the permit or license requested. 2. Yo'j may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license reqires council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certaan rights under M.S. 15.165 to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name, and date of birth are required to process this applicztion or permit. y �A First Mi a Last Add rp ss A 4 to oe mot apply to building/general permits) Phone I und, %I rights as stated above. q a.ur ,. LAKE TH �$� I �1-17131� IG 32 6� " 53 LSD ly IS 14 2 aw Opp —MA 4*'*AL to 16 RUN DATE 03/18/88 • BATCH 006 38 08-117-13 31 0002 • PROP ADDR 01396 BALDUR PARK RD OWNER NAME TEPRI5 M SADLER TAXPAYER TEFRIA M SADLER NAME/ADDR 1396 SALOUP PAPK RD . WAYZATA MN 55391 • 38 08-117-23 31 0005 PROP ADDR 01376 DALDUR PARK RD CWHER NAME WENDY L WEIHE ET AL TAXPAYER WENDY L WEIHE/THOMAS B WEIHE • NAME/ADDR AND GWEN E VEIHE 1376 SALDUR PARK RD WAYZATA MN SS391 • 38 08-117-.^3 31 0008 PROP ADDR DWNER NAME WILLIAM J M FRA►V LIN • TAXPAYER WILLIAM J M FRANK LIN NAME/ADOP BROADWAY SALES 1000 W BROADWAY MPLS MN 55411 • • • • • HE.',NEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 08-117-23 31 0003 01392 BALDUR PARK RD THEODORE W BOER ETAL THEODORE W EDER 1392 BALDUR PARE RD WAYZATA M14 55391 38 OC-117-23 31 0006 WILLIAM J M FRA14Y! IN WILLIAM J M FRAt1F.LIN BROADWAY SALES 1000 H BROADWAY MPLS MN 55411 38 08-117-23 31 0009 WIl'-IAM J M FRAN(LIN WILLIAM .! M FRAN(L:N BROADWAY SALES 1000 W BROADWAY MPLS MN 55411 REPORT NO. PI43S401 PAGE 11 38 08-117-23 31 0004 01384 BALDUR PARK, RD D A V KEESLII:G JR DCNALD/VIRGINIA K.EESLING JR 138v BALDUR PARK RD WAYZATA 184 55391 38 08-117-23 31 0007 WILLIAM J M FRAtU_L1N WILLIAM J M FRAtk.LIN BYOADWAY SALES 1000 W BROADWAY MPLS MN 55411 TOTAL BATCH 006 00008 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REVd(SENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS T; APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE 9ECORCS OF THE HENNEPIN COU7ATY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BEt.IEF. DATE�� BY I L y.; BARDCOVBR RDCULA 4 S ANQ NORRSHEET A. HARDCOVER 0 - 19151 -_00 0=p011Ci until adopted en ordinance limiting the rnrcenta f lot"AT-ATthat can be covsred with impervious surfac-a ("hardcover") such as roofs, driveways, sidewalks, etc. on properties located within 1,000 feet of a lake. Studies have shown that sediments, oils, and dcLris carried in the lake from highly -irbanized areas have a detrimental impact en the quality of water in the lake. The intent of Orono's ordinance is to ensure that rainfall run-off wil l ba cleansed by filtering through grassed or vegetated yard areas before entering the lake. B. HARDCOVER SETBACK ZONES - PERCENTAGE ALLOWED I. 0-751: in the area within 75' of the lakeahore, No Harecover is allowed II. 75-250's in the portion of the lot located between 75' and 250' from the lake, 250 of that portion of the lot may be hardcovered. III. 250-5001: in the portion of the lot located between 250' and 500' feet from the lake 300 of that portion of the lot may be hardcovered. IV. 500-1,000's in the portion of the lot located between 500' and 1,000' feet from the lake 350 of that portion of the lot mry be hardcovered. NOTE: These regulations apply -ven if you have a lot th-it does not abut the lake tut is within a lakeahore zoning district. C. HOW TO DETERMINE LOT AREA WITHIN EACH SETBACK ZONE ("o be used as denominator in all hardcover percentage calculations) _ I. 0-75' Zone S e -C Area - 75' x /Average width of lot in 0-75' zone \ up1� 1�rmeasure parallel to shoreline 75' x % �'" 7 ft. C-7 s.f. (1) qv (Avg width) Area of 0-75' zone II. 75-?5C' Zone A—ta - (175'or avg lot depth in zone) x(Avg width of lot in 75-250' zone1 + yU \ measure parallel to, shoreline ) ' x _ ft. ..t. 12) (Avg width) Area of 75-2SO' zone III. 250-500' Zone Area - (250' or avg lot depth in zone) xfAvq width of lot in 2SO-500' zone measure parallel to shoreline 250' x ft. s.f. (3) (Avq width►_Area of 2SO-SOn' son* Iv. 199-1,000' $one Area - 1500' or evq lot depth in tone' xi Avg width of lot in 500-1000' son*\ measure parallel to shoreline J 500' a _ _ft. _ _•.f. (4) (A%q width) Pros of SOO-1,000' z(ne D. HARDCOVER CALCULATION SUMMARY A. S. C. D. E. F. Existing Final Lakeshore Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Allowed Setback Lot Area Hardcover Percentage Ha,A-over Percentage Hardcover Zone In Zone In Zone (B/A)x100 In Zone (D/A)X100 Percentage ------------ ---------- -- --- - - -- -- --- -- - ------ _-............ 0-75, 75-250' 250-500, of f -1- ! sf ";0 • 0 • of �_sf �.G. r • %' -of Z_11 25 • of of �• —of • 30 • 500-1000' -of of HARDCOVER LIMIT%TIONS Pj o eL 0*LP o'�N x X ___ M\\ ROAD E. 0MR 1"ISHORI REGULATIONS • —of • 35 • HARDCOVER INCLUDESt - Structures with roofs - Decks, even if slatted - Sidewalks - Driveways (paved or gravel) - Decorative landscaping areas underlain by plastic sheeting - Tops of retaining walls, rock walls - Ary other surface that does not allow direct absorption of rainfall into the ground BBC. 10.22, R10ULATI0109 ]POP 'LR-IA', •Lt-Il►-2', •LR-le', 'LR-IC' AND •LR-IC-I* OA MMILT LA122/022 REVIDRfTIAL DIRTITCT. within any 'LR-lA', LR-lA-10, 'LR-131, 'LR-IC•, or •LR-IC-1. One family Lakeshore Residential, District the following requlations shall apply. Subd. 1. Lakeshore Set ^sck Regulations. The set back from the shoreline for lakeshore lots shall be 'it least 75 foot and no uuilding may be located closer to the shoreline than the avoraq` distance fro.+ the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent and nearby lots. subd. 2. Lakeshore Hard Cover Regulations. within 75 foot of shoreline these shall be no excavating, filling, hard cover, temporary or permanent strurturos. Within 75 to 150 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 250 hard cover. Within 250 to 500 foot of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 300 hard cover. within 500 to 1,00C foot of the shoreline there shall he no greater than 350 Lard cover. tuba. 3. Troo ReaovaI Regulatione. No troes within 75 foot of the share! ins with the diameter of six (0) inches or more shall be r~ ved without first obtaining a permit grow the Council. HARDCOVER CALCULAI.JN WORKSHEET Setback Zone: (circle o 75-250 250-500' 500-1000, Existing Hardcover in Zone a. House _ x - _�►'_ s.f. len0thy width x a.f. -- x x x s.f. b. Garage _ x c. Driveway x - , s.f. s.f. d. Sidewalk x . �� 1 s.f. Y _ x _ s.f. x _. - s.f. e. ratio/ x s.f. Dock f . Landscape x areas %. derlain by plastic shooting ■ _ , s.f. x . s.f. t. 9tMr s OR© s.f. ?"AL rxISTIMG "JIM'vdr^ 1t+ wr Existing Hardcover • ■ Total Existing Hardcover x 100 Lot Area Within Zone Z "2 . 3 ..r. x 100 • ? y-� 7 it fir 7 2 4• s.t. Additional Hardcover to be added in zone: I Length x Width - TOTAL s.f x - & a.t. r x -- x x - ,.f.�� T,­rAl. S . F. TO HE ADDED % _ (2 ) Fxisting Hardcover to be Removed, if any: Item Length x Width /a S x - a.t. 00 �� sT • r. el P.;'- x s.t. wAI-4- s . r . x r.-4 O �.+► till' x M_ 0 'K lU s.f. TOTAL S.F. To hf. RrmovID filial Hardcover Proposal: (1) • Line (2) -Line MI - ( = 5r'6� -> . rxisci•:g To be Added To be Rome;*4 Final E'r_posed P,rdcover f • 2749 14 • la1► • Z 100 • `"%, �' •rat HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEE:T -Setback Zonsj (circle one) 0--15' 75-250 25G-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in zone A. House _ _ x • _� s.[. length width x . s.f. ------ x - — - — s.f. •• s.f. x s.f. b. Garage x c. Driveway x s.f. x s.f. d. Sidewalk x • '" _ s.f. x • s.f. x s.f. !. Patio/ x �— s.f. Deck x • s.f. f. Landscape x _ . ( i s.f. areas underlain _ _ x by plastic sheeting _ _. _ . x _�._._ _ _ ._._ • f . x s.f. f . Other x • A $T* _--� _ wr_2 s.f. TC1'fAL [x 1 It t MG Kr1RbC01ltlR IM EQlgt '� ep • . f . (1 ) 'i Existing Hardcover 1 Total Existing Hardcover x 100 Lot Area Within Zone • / r / a . f . x 100 . //' o, �r 1 Additional Hardcover to be aeded in zone: Item Length x Width • TOTAL s.f. FGC'k-f x s.f. CR/t�j x s.f. TO^,AL S.F. TO HE ADDED �`� (2) Existing Hardcover to be Removed, if any: Length x Width • TOTAL s.f. r.RYN p �G.i pC�;12 r r; x _ /� s.f. x s.f. TOTAL S.F. To Br RFl1OVFD ; (3) ►lnel Macdcover Prof sal: (L1sK! (1) 4 Ube (.) -Lino (3)) t- Ruistial To he Added To be Pea+oved Final Proposod Nardeever t Line x 100 i 'Lis x 100 - Line (1) �;•� s.f, f 0 2- �uPIP0-7 Z apt- 7 Jr lIjrmfv"*s -r c*,) ; ` j rr „-+r Lz�� ✓ #Cg cL•� C Tf t'� .xy� .S' ! tiC:6 �V R' ! ' ` /`� �i . G4i r _ 70 � `1 �/l; 4�► z., / `IA.; CA, i1 7 CXRTIFICAT19 OF MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO ) I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin Coeinty, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing conc,Ir►ing the matter of 01280, was mailed to the attached list of r, operty owners . In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 23rC day of May, 1989. CITY OF ORONO NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Council Chambers at 1275 South Brown Road on Monday, June 6, 1988 on the matter of reviewing the following land use applications: 1. # 1275 Douglas Johnson of 1399 Park or i ve seeks side and average lakeshore setback variances and a hardcover variance within 75 feet of the lakeshore for additions to the existing residence. 2. #1276 David C. Bell Investment ae new owner of the property located at 3890 West Wayzata Boulevari seeks s conditional use permit to overate a food market, a legal non conforming use, at the residentially zoned property. 3. t1278 Ron Timm of 4496 North Shore Drive seeks an average lakeshore setback in order to construct a lakeside deck. 4. 11280 Wendy L. Weihe of 1376 Baldur Park Road seeks hardcover and lakeshore setback variances for a major addition to the existing residence. ; S. 81281 Dennis A. Meyer of 4731 North Shore Drive seeks a va-aince that would allow the structura; repair of an accessory structure on a lot that does not sustain a principal structure. 6. #1282 Richard Mast of 985 Tonkawa Road seeks a variance to the required setback from a wetlands for the installation of a tannis court and a conditional use permit for the alteration of an existing wetlands. 7. #1283 Gary and Beth F.scher of 3556 Livingston Avenue seek approval of an after the fact setback variance for the alteration of an existing garage. 8. 11284 Douglas Kirchner of 1528 Bohns Point Road seeks an after the j fact average lakeshore setback variance for the installation of a lakeside deck. 9. 11285 Eric Paulson of. 2605 Mapleridge Lane seek] a conditional use permit for the installation of a permanent dock. 1 It. 11286 Gary Roderick Construction Inc. owner of the new home under construction at 1749 North Farm Road seeks a height variance for a privacy fence to be installed in front/street yard. 11. 11287 James F. Brooks of 3785 Watertown Read seeks u side setback variance to construct a rear addition. I 12. f 1288 Ward E. Edwards of 2474 Carman Street seeks a lakeshore setback renewal variance to construct a new residence. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. The meeting starts at 7:60 PM. Written comments are solicited. Plans are available for review in the City offices by appointment. By: Planning Commission Je3-nne A-)�. abusEh Building i Zoning Administrator To be published the week of May 2, 1988. J-J.t�on P%NftfNW tomm Impel tiw Congo G11a1rre 41 ISM r/t Weeilleell 40 tarrimlr iIwa a. tw at asMile,�1Mi� file 1e rllaw 1. f>i OwI� Juw� �I aM M IieaNaarll IMow 4w a 11 �w e lit wa y fa. erwlrl. b�ll� �II1 [ car Dowel Mir d so •goppity taeend r1 1pma o@Wb car earls • rarriaaww ow pr DO tlprau a lame W06 •r • OW MOW tim a /r rerlartray .orM we nw Term a Z;; �rw w be am" w camp Wwwwe sibs@* r air • ow &vw a Wa111e airs 4 11a 1 Of t#n,r l W@r el t tilt psi re obw on" ire► on "mupwe sat no OPWAM for a WAW eamkw to we MI & Ile 101 DWM a 14ever of 413i MOM% an Y1ra swop a forme to octal ebs e alaww carp of w •may addle I e to so Nw aM nrweap a ampwr • Ir 1m itowe WAO a m Tie car a rwwM 1e so fimsi r eal�wa a r�r to on solemn" e1 a lrretr WMMW a: a /w�rr seem Penn am, ate � aa1� � w e>.Mr� wlbrr fr �. 1 >p rr w1 fbMl fir .r itlM urelpiw*ArWAWISO carrel of w ataw the Arl aa/i11a +Arise 1r M riot rr d w • owe 0-0 6 w ! n4 Owr/aa Iorrrrw a ISM bighm OWN Ann stalls V mar re 160 aver W r/wearre goomb r111ree w rrr aMrb "mrn of a Iowa & sea Ma I M /N tiirw e1 MM 1WrrWP LAM raw a undoma rllr "me b go ti 11almoa of a pon wrwl a111. 1A Na l m try fA1a111ri dlrrllerw wra aww e+ Me caw %am ,war rwirwrremw a 1140 Hair tine Aid stars a here nOlrrree lim, 0 Wagner rerree Ilse Mom/ M asionow P" 11 1% IMP Aw i •MW a1 sibs Mraarw Pool @rills a aa1 embak ratchet r err11r1Ir a car @@dam is I" I m W" I carrel at U14 C:1r rare 8"0 on" a mbeo a eesela parterre" rr%mtea to e1rlow1 a nes paelaree M prpra owe" r an n ra an seesaw a Oft No rite car a FM ►rIt woo Ica eaten m w sobfta mire, w amens" lllr MMOM w " Cft eo%= Itlr eesemblMtepe or PUrtrre CeaerMMP Je A 1YrrM% �� rIl capita Aaarearelr r We Umor wa ft r /r 3J 1� Maar1'. f� Mr 1faM Affidavit of Publication State of Minnesota. County of Hennepin Bill Holm, bung duly sworn, on oath says that he is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER Mound. Min- nesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below A ) The newspaper has complied with all the requve- ments constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A 02, 331A07, and other -pplicable laws. as amended �amM . B )f�The tpl��annlr�l) printed l' I I C '' Q W" in, which is attached was cut i _)m the columns of said newspaper. and was printed and published once each week for successive weeks It was first published Monday the 3 day of IV V'� . 19' and was thereafter printed and published every Monday, to and including Monday. the day of . 19 !L'VTi� ��� Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to me on this day of r ' 19 BY � uwiwllMls G14'1� o�ry Goolom Rlllw +cat 3 11M Rate hriernlatien I —Ow"! tidsaityO"dte pad Vy ..axnmerGM! Usem for Coffoara bit spat'.* =7 B; Pep ntCh 2, ma+rariia r rile riowW by on, 14Y above ^Fluter 64 94 prr WWA 3i F1a4e actumly cPw9W for ADow'e utter $4 54 pal mc}+ Each at"IKr r wmeaewe *oek $3 03 Poor *V2% ■ i L .J I L I k --«ecT sssaw■ TO: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: Michael Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE: June 2, 1988 SUBJ: #1280 Wendy Weihe, 1376 Baldur Park Road - Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District -• LR-lC Single Family 1/2 Acre Sewered Application - Hardcover and lakeshore setback variances to construct major additions- to existing residence. List of Esbibits - A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Letter from neighboring property owner E - Survey F - Hardcover calculations by applicant and staff G - Plan of existing hardcover to be removed H - Plan of proposed new hardcover I - Elevation views of proposed additions nd floor plans J - LR-lC Contemporary variance listing K - 1982 Preliminary Plat of Baldur Par i n t Pertinent Facts - 1. The applicant is proposing to construct additions to the existing house, as follows: a. Construct a second story over existing one story room addition. b. Construct an a(ld i t ion between the house and garage which will inc1udr, a 3-season porch, storage area, master bedroom suite, and a turret -type deck area at a third story level. (-. Remove the existing deck end construct a larger deck extend;ng westward from the new living room area created in item (a) above. 2. The entire existing house is within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone. The house is currently, 28' from the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka. Virtually all of the proposed additions will take place in the 0-75' lakeshor- setback zone. 1. Staff has reviewed and s 1 ight ly revised applicant's hardcc�ier calculations per Exhibits F attached and as follows fnote that 9-75' figures includo hr,th north and south zones): t 't Zoning File #1280 Page 2 Exibting Proeosed 0-75' �30.48 �30.9% 75-250' 49.09, 46.6% 4. Although the hardcover does show slight decreases in both 9-75' and 75-250' zones, the applicant's intent ;s to increase structural hardcover on the property by half again as much as now exists. The structural increases are in additional decks and in additional structure. The structural hardcover changes are as follows: Existing Proeosed -2,157 0-75' (N) 1,313 s.f. s.f. 75-250' 637 s.f. 709 s.f. 0-75' (S) 0 s.f. 0 s.f. 1,950^s.f. 2,866 s.f. Net Change +916.s.f. 5. The proposed hardcover removals and additions are shown on applicants diagrams which are listed as Exhibits G and H. Note that the existing deck of width 9.4' will extend approximately 1.5' closer to the lake, according to the design plans. Also, because the existing second story deck above the westerly room will become a living room, applicant is proposing a deck expansion to the west. 6. Note that the additional room expansion, where there currently is no structural hardcover, is between the house and the garage, where it will have no significant visual impact from the northerly lake, but will be quite visible from the west. 7. Applicant is proposing a 5' separation between the new construction and the existing garage, with the new addition to be archit^ctural ly attached to the garage by a covered wa1k•+ay. Fro:n a zoning code standpoint; this .:ould appear to require a variance to the requirement of 10' separation betwei-n buildings. From a fire safety st,-ndpoint, the garage and the house can be constricted with the appropriate fire walls so that building code standards can bf met. 8. Note that the proposed additions will :)e constructed to meet the sine setback requirement of 10'. 9. The current structure 3utting above the house does meet the required I0' maximum heiqht limitation. Zoning File #1280 Page 3 10. Staff would su39est that this property certainly has some unique circumstances and hardships, given that it is sandwicher' between two shorelines. This situation occurs along Baldur Park and along Fagerness Point Road, both areas in which a number of variances have been granted in recent years. Attached as Exhibit J is a listing of the variances that have been granted in recent years in these two similarly situated and similarly zoned areas. Although hardships and unique circumstances will vary from application to application, the information presented should provide Planning Commission with some sense of the degree or magnitude of variances that have been consistently approved. 11. A summary of the necessary variances is 3s follows: a. 0-75' hardcover. b. 75-250' hardcover. c. Additional structure in 0-75' zone, including the concomitant grading and excavation associated with such construction. d. 5' structure -to -structure setback varianr?. Additional Items of Concern - The property owners directly adjacent to the property, the Keesling's, have submitted a letter supporting the application, stating that their views will not be hindered and that the addition would be a beneficial wind block for their house. Note that the Keesl ing roof draina3e may tend to flow somewhat across the applicants yard area. If the additions were constructed, staff would recommend that the drainage be allowed to flow to the southwest onto the flat area of applicants's property to enhance infiltration. Note also that at applicant's property, the City no longer maintains Baldur Park Road, and it serves merely as a driveway serving applicant and the residents at the tip of Baldur Park Point. it would appear with the proposed driveway plan that applicant could park two cars in the garage and two more cars on the driveway apron within the property boundaries, without affecting that continuing driveway. Staff would express the concern however that, if the property at tte end of Baldur Park RrNad is developed at some point in the future, the City may require that a private read outlot be dedicated, with the potential that public road dedication be required. While th's has not been discussed at any great length recently, a past application to divide the point into three total lots had received preliminary approval, with a -•ul-de-sac directly adjacent to the applicant's driveway (see Exhibit K). Based on that preliminary approval, applicant's proposed deck would en,i up 10' from the edge of the cul-de-sac dedicated for Baldur Park Road, and a portion of appiioant..'s property would be dedicated for Baldur Park Road. ■ Zoning File t1280 Page 4 Staff views this application similar to the request by Denny Williams at 1932 Fagerness Point Road in 1985, in which a relatively small cabin was allowed to be transformed into a larger residence, located only 26' or so from the lakeshore. Visually, staff believes this application, if approved, would generate the same comments and criticism from the public as did the Williams approval, and generally might be perceived as being an unusual approval. However, again be reminded that this property has unique circumstances and hardships that may in fact provide a basis for some type of approval. Staff would question the appropriateness of the applicant's elimination of an ?xisting deck over a living space, thereby necessitating side,.vard encroachment into the 0-75' zone to create a new deck. While the raw hardcover percentages show a slight decrease with this proposal, the structural hardcover increases as a result of deck space would appear excessive. Staff also does not find any hardship to justify deck encroaching closer to the lake than the existing deck, and would recommend that the deck portion on the lake side of the louse he reduced or eliminated, with a stairway located within the newer deck portion at the west end of the hosue, if in fact the p: oposa 1 is approved. Staff would also note that the sidewalks with this proposal have been minimized to include just those which are necessary. Note that there is no below -grade basement for this house, but the existing lower floor is used essentially as a basement currently, and the owner notes it has some water problems. Mote that all new addition3 must have floor levels no lower than elevation 932.5 MSL. Staff Recommendation - Staff would recommend that Planning Commission review the application in relation to what has been approved in other similar situations, with an eye toward reducing the degree of lateral structural hardcover increase, and reducing to the greatest extent possible the continued encroachment of decks on the northerly lake side of the house. Also, Planning Commission might consider whether the addition of the turret room above the roofline will perceptually add greatly to the bulk of she house, and whether its elimination would make this structure visually less obtrusive; but remember that the City has consistently recommended that additions on lakeshore lots go upwards, not laterally, jnd the turret meets the 30' height limit but is over new structure. The proposal appears somewhat excessive in hardcover, in relation to past approvals in similar situations. Planning Commission must consider the rights of the property owner weighed against the potential detriment to the health, safety and we fare cif the community and the intF-nt of the LR-IC zoning district. North Central Trading ��� ' D Ce a ■ MAP 11 J4IMM 11095 Viking Drive Suite 410 Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Phone (612) 944-9692 April 12, 1988 We are signing that we saw Wendy Weihe's house plans and agreed that she could build it as it is ►;d that it would be a beneficial wind block for our house. Wendy Weihe's house will not hinder our view and she will protect our land from any damage from the construction. We live next door to Wendy Weihe at 1384 Baldur Park Road, Orono, MN. Signed: 1061'-A.- Don Keesling Cr•vk� ( JdMf eesl ing 11, tyVU S4rr A6b I yl OAJ - E)qEx-s * irokej - Lst JV7 - 4Z'74--SS M"Dobvev r_� ; itJ4 t C r RMOUTI MORIKSHRET 1 A. RARDCOVER ORDINANCE - In 1975, the Orono City Council adopted an ordinance limiting the percentage of lot area that can be covered with impervious surfaces ("hardcover*) such as roofs, driveways, sidewalks, etc. on properties located within 1,000 feet of a lake. studies have shown that sediments, oils, and debris carried into the lake from highly urbanized areas have a detrimental impact on the quality of water in the lake. The intent of Orono's ordinance is to ensure that rainfall run-off will be cleansed by filtering through grassed or vegetated yard areas before entering the lake. B. RARDCOVER SETBACK ZONES - PERCENTAGE ALLOWED I. 0-75's in the area within 75' of the lakcahore, No Hardcover is allowed (00). -- -- II. 75-250's in the portion of the lot located between 75' and 250' from the lake, M of that portion of the lot may be hardcovered. III. 250-5001s in the portion of the lot located between 250' and 5001feet from the lake 300 of that portion of the lot may be hardcovered. IV. 500-1,0009s in the portion of the lot located between 500' and 1,000' feet from the lake M of that portion of :;,e lot may be hardcovered. NOTE: These regulations apply even if you have a lot that does not abut the lake but is within a lakeshore soning district. C. HOW TO OSTiRMINE LOT MM 11ITRIN EACH SETBACK ZONE (To be used as denominator in all hardcover percentage calculations) I. 0-75' son* Area - 75' x /Average width of lot in 0-75' zone) ` measure parallel to shoreline f 75' x ft. ; �50C t s.f. (1) (Avg width) Area of 0-75' zone II. 75-250' Zone Area • (17S'or avq lot depth in zone) x(Ameasure vg width of lot in 75-250' zone\ parallel to shoreline J 175' x ft. • Z,G'S:;, -t s.f. (2) (Avg width) Area of '1S-250' zone II1. 250-100, zone Area • (250' or avq lot depth in zone) xrAvg width of lot in 250-500' sons) 1� measure parallel to shoreline / 250' x _ _ ft. • s.f. (3) (Avg width) Area of 250-500' gone IV. 500-1,000' son_* Area • (S00' or avg lot depth in son*) xrAvq width of lot in 500-1000' zone1 measure parallel to shoreline 1 500' x _ft. s.f. (4) (Avg width) Area of 500--1,000, zone D. RArmCOVXR CALCULATION SUMMARY Few Z, ' A. S. C. D. E. F. Existing Final Lakeshore. Existing Hardcover Prop00%.d hardcover Allowed Setback Lot Area Hardcover Percentage Hardcover Percentage Hardcover soae In Zone In Zone (8/A)x100 In gone (D/A)x100 Percentage 0-751 �? of �'1f00±st �, • 2 sf � � • o • 7S-250' -of 12 f ".a • 1/af �' �'. �.�• 2S • 250-500' of of • of • 500-1000, of of • of • 35 • RAAOCOV=R LIMITATIONS ROA D AARDCOVER INCLUDESt - Structures with roofs - Decks, even if slatted - Sidewalks - Driveways (paved or gravel) - Decorative landscaping areas underlain by plastic sheeting - Tops of retaining walls, rock wells - Any other surface that does not allow direct absorptiom of rainfall into the ground R. gm.imp ASGUTATIONS SIML 10.22, I MtO Pon 'LR-lA', 'LA -IA--: ' , %R-lA', 'LA-1C' AM 'LR-IC-1. O� MUtL? LAKW 0! RUSIMTtaL DIMMICT. Within an; ".,R-lA LJt-IA-I*,•LR-180,-LR-IC', or 'LA•-IC-1' One nmily Lakeshore Resideatial District following regulations shall applyt Sabi. 1. t-.;.eehore Set back Regulations. a set back from the shoreline for Lakeshore lot. shall be at leant 75 feet .end me ".ding way be located closer to the ti shoreline than the average distance from ci. horeline of existing residence built e;+ on adjacent and nearby lots. SW A. 2. Lakeshore Ward Cover Regulation- ithin 7S feet of shoreline there i►.al' be so excavating, tilling, hard cover ,-narary or permanent structures. ' ►4f&An 7S to 2SO feet of the shoreline there at,. no greater then 2S• herd cover. .•'.him 2SO to Soo feet of the shoreline that I be no greater than 300 hard j. cover. Within SOO to 10000 feet of the shore': re shall be me greater than 3S• `r hard cover. Subd. 3. Tree Removal Roqulation.. Nei ., r •uit.hln 'S feet of the shoreline With thv diasrrter of six (6) inches or more s"f Imp r%%PAovwd vtthout ftrst aotatniaq 6 persit tram the council. HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET i Setback Zoner (circle onr) 0-7t)'% 75-25'l' 250-500' 500-1000' Piatinq Hardcover in tone a. Rouse z length ridth a - s.f. z - s.f. _ x e. Garage x - -- s.f. / c. Driveway x . t f( i _ d. Sidewalk i �AV z __— _ a.f. e. ratio/ x a.f. Deck x ndsespe x • s.[. coos underlain x R.f. by plastic _ t sheeting _ x • a.t. w x • e.f. • t. Other x a . f . ] 1'Q'!<AL txIS'CIMG NARDCOVlR 1 N iON! • �s Existing Hardcove. f - Total Existing Hardcover x 100 Lot Area Within Zone x 100 + �_t `00 S s.f. Additional hardcover to he addeJ in zone: Item Leryth x Width TOTAL s.f. z - cS s.t. x WNF ' . x - _�i a.r. r TOTAL S.F. TO BE ADDED "'"Z (2) Existing Hardcover to be Removed, if anyt Stem Lenqth x Width TOTAL s.f. P' `-/ : 4 s.t. a. f . - x TOTAL S.P. TO BE REMOVED(3) Final Hardcover Proposals (Line 11) + Line (2) -Line !3)1 . txistiny To be A ed To be R~ved Final Proposed Rardeorer 1 - ?7> i ne 4) a 100 1 1 d i,t' S. f. z 2 C?0 - 00 JL Line (1) 4*rW> 9.f. 4. HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET ve r Setback loner (CirCle one) 0-75' '5-at' 250-500, 500-1000' 1„i..';i,g Hardcover • • Total ^cisting Hardcover x 20o Lot Area Within zone si.tinq Mardcover in zone � `` -,,+ . � s.t. x 100 - c 0 a. House x • s.f. length width Additional Hardcover to be added in tone: A Item Length x Width • TOTAL s.f. c-D 0+CC, x - aft. ' X • a.f. 44ct�5, x X s.t. rat/C —�---- ` b. Garage x r • ,r., ; "" s.t. . o - �tom' X •.!. c. Driveway x • a.f. �f IKE: x • 2 s.t. • f TOTAL S.F. TO u AM= Y rs a s . . d. Sidewalk x • �+— s.t. Rxistiny Rardcover to be Mootid, it •aye * • s . t . item UWAU - x -.. ftf • !S . f . .� ��..�� b�tAv3 � ! • s.t. ---... �- K--..-.�-� r -.r- •.t. D �^ � x - � �' f. patio/ x s.t. ra-a •.f. F Dock S f. Landscape x . �G �� (n s.t. X ----� • ��.� •.t. _ wafts underlain x - aft. TOTAL S .►. z1 v (3)41 TO U Rl i by plastic sheetInq x f.t. Final :srdcovnr proposals a (1) ♦ Lief (2) -t.tas (3)) •/ f . Other x • s t /- [ 3 �e� ♦ _.. L. 6 ~� ) • f ��� +� r � I � • Lt,d� . . . To ixistisq be Add" To be Remved Final s t Prop**" Rsrdcowr i • x • s.f. I"" "ISTIMG OAM)COVlR IN E711i f J Q t s . t . r l ! - lone (41 j�"''` �� x 100 7, D- q Line (1) ! 75s.t. YYVV 5rAFF CA CC. UAr-k)U��.k smx2,S �'a c k� J WA-t.. ,w S3 ?, P, `' ,, u All / 3 t 9 /U X q,12 - it ExN • F 5 ///23 s; , A,2- J f4 S � �► � SS, 2-S 2 SS-, !A- 9--e.,,m v ar , +, F, / 14. � s �, At 2 /, zz.3,� VtAbVArt,S 6�W. F-(o Mb ovtw-A-t-� WMLIL "m P(3 s WIQ1, 14 2- 2- 13 32 2, &DY1 b �3 x1D CO. F-7 Coo paOD V-7 Oo-J 7:) �, cr �- AJ, Je4l vio tl*l 7 , 1-7(,. 32. -74F-L" w Co °! Oro M � l S 3(.. �30 y� C /23`� y`.c. % y2 Zy.t •,. 32N; ��, �? � 9 C � t t rl& Co .r 2St� qal , O %�• �G G. '/. — 2. Y °lam r r,*rw t_ 4AA* coo v r& c.#,w4c-#s Ott ?l - a ro 70 °1 lj�m • F W 9 (09010 -Lz2 , R4pos� 2zcc �(�.er e-r• /t.es0t L r t.�,c-c co d,t C 14A&� - i 3(.0 .4 120 _Ho y2 �iy, z •,.� f4ofbrrfl -' S'r-r�u c.•rur�J�� co v e+e., 17� Jr7 ^' v P,colgs � ` , �"%SrV , �3r3 s �. Z;3�7 s-�. A'�vi f1G� '%� �'rS r• ro �.--� -►1 d i t.1, CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR WENDY L . WE I ICE IN LOTS P1 and 21 , BLOCK I , "BALQUR PARK" 6x4�v- F—c7 ' M NNFPIN COUNTY, MINNE)O(n so `qaQ a v1 a -i R4 lq I V t � p ql� 4 ° • � ...-------- - - 1'"4''� . 'EIS. - '�►-, � if "• �.et : � !fJ 0 !�, �i / 7 s n � ap h f0, !'� r Mr 4 1 1 hereby Certify that th►, d true arnt COrf-f'(t rcpresentdta.)n of ,a of the botmdaries of al 1 < f tot. 2U and that par i. 21, Hl oc+t , " It l dUr Paris• dest r i bed as f o l lows 6"IMI" on the oleander I i r►e at tree Mortheast.pr ► v - nr ns- ,f -,at( # 1lr Alljpl rtasre- - - sold line a de 4tanc "' ,t 50 feet to tf r i CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR WENDY L. WEIHE IN LOTS 20 a ? 1 , BLOCK 1, "BALOUR PARK" HEtr.-EPIN COUrrTY, MINNESOTA61 To rt m 0v I�vi sLD , 5. � ' 3� � •. �F TN s`o •VIPs`' 1 .ti / y; • M N 41 i 1 s 1 e w O �a u w �, _ - /OtNt � N 3rlo Syr+• jl.SXr __ ` 1 r \ 1 hereby Cert i fy that thl s 1 s a true jnu corn t ry iresentat i on Jt a ..U+ Vey of the boundaries Of all Of Lot ?Q diol thet Part et Lct 21, B'Ock 1, " Balms Park" destrlbed a3 follows k2iwln9 On the r-sander I ine at the Northe,,;te, 1 y earner of Said Lot 21; the"Ce ftrtt%wsterly on Sala I1ne a distaric- of W fe �t to R u EXN . H swap,. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR WENDY L. WEIHE I N LOT; 20 and 21 , NL.00K 1 "BALUUR I)ARK" HENNEPIN COUNTY, MI NNE kATA 1�4 r sE0 5• � `�'� kj 1 hereby certify that this is a true anct cor rk.r t r tsent at i :;r, of Ofthe bowWaries Of ai I of Lot 2Q and th.,t t,jrt cit Lot 21. Block 1 "11e1dur P&Wdescrytied a, follows: 0091"niry on the sir-, lift at the Northemster1v 'orrwr at said __ } bMlCe 11®rtAfid4 tc�r ` : send i trie a di stance of 50 feet tQ_L s.. ..i.--- - - -- - -- - 3 �'-IC LATH f�� Ca"fv-N.loop ho •/ T7Au•4etrv�R V�M,Or�e Srr+ru..e.. TWA 0. 4 bb" zz Ace A 0--,Sr 4d{A ,qua -•c t> 4"A A LuwvU "r A4FA /&t4epwv rp 13�re F,rwMR. P►..2b 13, NSo /U, b' �0.0' ?hSD %� �_ �� • #zoo ' _�3qr� ,. i4e3 i3,'sao 3.�rfl??o /yda .• �`}fl`1 fir, (,00 ,..era 5 3'i. .Oro 39.-)'/. Zg.z Y. ,1�10� .. 1•ief ': rO1��'` ?. �^J �%.. �,2"D 34•SY• sr.) � N�7 /►fr 2 ., i�gg !l, ll? 423 O ;% 7, % r►,sc.z. l4,lLro 3,7�/B �., • G,31 t �Q• 0 /. 9 %. pegs ! l2q �, J`t?� 0 p'y pr `; ,;sue 8 o/o n H,�s. 3r. : 9 / Z 3. Y �. �R7'/ir 'y.y'/./,oB2 • YZ•3'/ 3R.`.. /. Mr Vn 27 •% / ? ' �� %9'32 i'yl,,u ..: 14 t�► -'�1 Lr3�7 +.,3Z.'� 2-•] �. .— — 2". , i /t9Z� �'. /o.. 1107 i3,quo 17,3-; / 3y, '/r , 2.7 ,�J'1! • .r bit /4 C'�.. .. ,v:.t 12 �•/i U4y'� n3 s �. / r/i 21 e i 3; sp �1 - wo r ��a r1g: �- o • c 3S9b•r�1�4's c 3�„ �.,0 3,2� �rti� Se,sy. a3. e.•: �►4re ,1 tro , •;. • ra 29.0 2�/.� y riyy :r MINUTRb GP THR PLAMING COMMISSION M'EF ItG HELD JUNE 6, 1988 #1277 BIG ISLAND BOARD OF GOVERNORS CONTINUED It was mcvii by B- flows, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval the conditional use permit for phase 2 per staff : mmer.dations 1-9, subject to the 4'x 8' and 8'x 8' car signs be reduced in size to meet the sign standards for commercial sites and be located 75' from the lakeshore and that the 3'x 5' camp rules sign be placed by the dock. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. #1278 WE TIM 4496 MOSTS OBOES DRIVE VARIAMCS POSUC HAA1tING The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were r.oted . There were no comments fron, the public rep ing this matter. Due to the absence of the applicant or a representative, it was moved by Kelley, seconded by Bellows, tc table Application 11278. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 91Z60 NESDT L. WINE 13Tt7 PARE ROAD AEIAWZ PUBLIC SEARIOG 9:01-9:37 The Affidavit were noted. 0. . of Publication and Certificate of Mailing Wendy Weihe and her architect were present for this matter. Me. Weihe reviewed her request for hardcover and lakebhore setback wariantes to construct major additions to the existing residence. She stated tbut the proposal Is the only alternative to sc lving the apace problem noting that due to water problems, she cannot make improvement to the basement area. Walley noted that although the shows a slight decrease in both the 0-75' and i5C'' zones, the proposal involves adding structural _ dcover, Bellows questioned the structural integrity of the existing structure to support the proposed additions. Ms. Neihe stated that they pu•paeely -)reed the proposed additions out so that the existing structure could support Lhe additions. Kelley felt the structural hardcover exce ••e. 7 M MINUTZS OF THE PLRWING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNR 6, 1988 #1280 WICINN CONTINU No. Weihe stated she was under the impression that a hardcover trade-off would be accepteble to allow her to build her additions. Johnson felt that the applicants proposed hardcover trade-off was consistent with past applications. William Franklin, owner of Lot 1 adjacent to applicant's property, stated that he has a legal easement access across applicant's property and showed the Planning Commission a survey locating the easement. Ms. Weihe stated that according to her legal research, Mr. Franklin does not have a legal easement but has tried to work with Mr. Franklin regarding this issue. She did not feel this issue was relevant to this application. Bellows voiced concern with recommending approval of the variances prior to resolution of the easement issue. Planning Commission made the following recommendations to applicant regarding her application: The structure -to -structure setback must be 10' if detached, and if an attachel garage is built, it must have footings and a f irewa l 1. Johnson and Bellows felt the house could be decreased slightly to decrease the hardcover. Moos felt there were many issues to be resolved before - making a recommendation. Kelley felt the structural hardcover should be reduced. Bellows suggested that applicant find out if the existing foundation car support building additions upward rather than outward to create less hardcover. Me. Neihe felt that by looking at the house, it was evident that the house could not support building upward additions. She noted that she is removing a substantial mount of hardcove.L which should justify allowing the proposal. There were no other comments fr he public regarding this matter. it was moved by Kelley, seconded by Johnson, t� table this application pending resolve of the easement issui and for applican• to review the proposal baser on Planning Comniissio:; .. cr mnents. Motion, byes 4, Nays 0. 8 ZONING FILLS NO. 1280 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION FICTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 6/9/88 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO& Wendy Weihe 1376 Baldur Park Road Wayzata, MN 55391 TYPE OF APPLICATIONt Variance ----------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF NER27NOt 6/6/88 VOTE: 4 For 0 Against Planning Commission recommends the followings Tabled for re, one noted below. MOTES AMD SPNCM CONDITIONS: Planning Commission tabled this item pending: 1. Applicant to revise proposal to reduce magnitude of hardcover and structural variances required. 2. Applicant/staff to inves,:igate what easements affect this property and how they affect it. As we discussed by phone on 6/8/88, you should submit a revised F Tan that is less intense in atr-ctural and overall hardcover. Also, you must provide staff with a title opinion listing all the easements that affect the property, and provide a copy of each easement dociment. Applicant's ,text scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the June 20th Planning Commission meeting is June 14th (noon), or July Sth for the July 18th meeting, If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are availsbie from the C Recorder after review and approval by the Planniinq Commission. To: File #1280, 1376 Baldur Park Road From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning Administrator Date: June 13, 1988 Subject: Easements Wendy Weihe's attorney has provided two documents which appear to be filled in the chain of title of the subject property. The first of those documents is Document #2513998 which is a document that transfers property from Arnold Boxrud and Mabel Boxrud to John and ? Ferrin, and at the same time reserves an easement for driveway purposes over a portion of the property. Boxrud, the grantor, transfers Lot 20 and a portion of Lot 21 to Ferrin. In addition, Boxrud reserves an easement for driveway purposes over a portion described by a four-sided tigure as has been described previously. This easement Is subject to interpretation, because it does not descr: oe the property which is benefitted by the easement, only two persons who are presumably benefitted by it. It does no* indicate what properties the Boxruds owned prior to their transfer to Ferrin, hence it is questionable just what properties have the right for driveway purposes over the easement in Lot 20. They other. Document #144094-L is not an easement document at all but is a copy of a mortgage agreement which decribes Lot 30, Block l of Baldur Park as security for a mortgage loan. The description for Lot �0, Block 1 in this mortgage includes an easement over Lot 31 for a septic system and includes a non-exclusive easement for driveway purposes over a strip of land 12' in width, with a description that places that easement partially within Lot 20. However, according to applicant's attorney Daniel Tyson, there is no easement document itself filed against 1376 Baldur Park Road, hence the purported easement described in the mortgage may in fact have never been legally granted, and may not legally exist. It would appear then that there are potentially two easements for "driveway purposes" over Lot 20, and the validity of those two easements has yet to be determined. The descriptions of the two purported easements are not concurrent, and neither easement appears to coincide directly with the two representations of the existing gravel road presentee: by Gron berg 6 Brown. Lacking additional information, staff would suggest that these easements will certainly have an affect. on development of Baldur Park Point. However, for purposes of determining lot area for use in hardcover calculations, the easements that may exist are considered as driveway easements, not private road or public road easements. wo IJ .ej �.. �4 ^� '44 15 50 17ar 9 AO 14 .1 48 ,--, _j w �0�'T'raJ4C.l.��' �� t--^�=� � .: t..,-:� � `J D Ian C C, F't N G►..1C � h L "00 L �• r� b K rz. Jj ', ►/'^ ! D �-�'�" h�c�'t'. L. 4 1��.•. a 1ti. 4 u,a C C- Q`'N R ! �� � �� �s w tn,.a.14J`+�+...-� 04, TWIT Ormorr i� ,-�-�� � — .,,-�-�c,M fib► ! �C Lt iM �,n+ T ciw. 1 ►- �),tb ret,_-T 1 1' "itt' CcNV On.( ,� �S ,�-►'r � w +t'� ! s N -r '(`U�'!' Z+ac� r� e �' �r ,� IJ�E? AI"R` 3 rntZ.tR �i� Du� � �;., E � � `� . I^a Oaf}�1 �., G. / N GUE7 ift°`.5 T/ n- F' /N � 1 �„#�►t 1 �oN�y 4+�+ c.F �; � E'"`c► i � �..� � � � �r 3 � �y4,oF'e� cam• a �+ A- Ar . i 0J � e ww Ck ! I c 06--j *:, s, > p ", &e- 6,eA"-We, ('eurl or tVAR-.r _- 4,VO04,f b G44,t,J7—" S ( It Of Nal- Aj 4S-, -b4A A,* 2-1 . �:� . aA"-"OR L 4V 0.) T4kt -iw IsvoLui vote or I-skllt� wf7er.") AOL T*-v. dow'.". Aej" t4!;J/6tjc OF 7ww- 1'94*A11I 1? 1/9 -TW AW Z.,� IF ;ORE. .ate road it icea lot:, Ilk t- At Intl -it IF F A c, F - 1, Yr F CIP i tot 7w(:-Av L I jr,(, ' in La Idtir Pat rt. t F'A i nY In the -p-antors hereiii. tt*ir dsi; iqn-, the sli-vivo, and the heit's and as,3i,4n% of the sip-,rivor. in Pa,, -,men? for driveway pist-poses owfli, that ;)Of ' 10ft said lot described at, follows: ConvixAng at the Southeasterly ftrrer of %arfix Lot 211); theme Northwester 'i on the 'ine nf' -,t. I ljtt "11, li-,tdnt .4 45.0 feet. triencu 'Wrthedl *Prlj to d point or the %nrIihi�St— 'v line �'* , t id Lot 20 distant 41 .', feet NortheaSterli froth the 1, -orre- of Said tot 20; thence Northedstirly on the I'Jorthwesterly 'ime of %ai-t 'Ot 20, "istatit VY0 feet; thence Southwesterly to the pis,-.p of te-01111int) as, -ow laid nut. and ?hat part of Lot Twenty-one (211. WoO One (.I' in tldldio it4 desu, ibed as follows: Comienc inq at tl,e Meander line on thv 'jort�,ea -*orl i i ornee of Sd id Lot N ; thence Northwesterly on said line distant fi-el t1- & b i "th - 4 weste, ly rorner of Said Lot i : . thtn r )otjthwf,-.tpr) , (-.,r. -if, ' i Itne of said Lot Zi. (Witaut 23. feet. theme Souttwasterl., U, ) looint of' the Soistileastetily line (,( Lt lf.wt SOtjth%estpj,ly ff-rut, ttie ljc)rtheasterly corners. themef* Northeasterly on told ',oplitt,00%tprly line, 66.5 feet to the 06(e of beginning. 1: . hey-rby certify that this JPtci:pldA or rp;.,ort wa,: irpit,#reo by t,ie or under *y direct sispervistor dnd trot I at' - (ijil-v tvqiStvipd kisrv(-pr urut* the lawof thp State of �'mnesotA. d 3- Tat Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Planning Commission Meinbern City Administrator Bernhardson jr t Michael Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE Junp 15, 1988 SOWS i1280 Wendy Weihe, 1376 Baldur Park Road - Variances - Second Review List of tshibits - A - Revised Floor Plans/Site Plan B - Revised Exhibit F-5-A (Detailed Hardcover C'alc, Reviried Proposal) C - Easement Documents Provided by Applicant's Attorney D - Mewo i Exhibits of June 2, 1988 Dismesion - At your last meeting, Planning Commission tabled this application, advising applicant to revise the proposal to decrease structural hardcover and overall hardcover on the property. In addition, staff was directed to review the easement situation on the proF'�rty. Application has provided a revised plan showing a decrease in the size of the proposed addition, and somewhat revising the deck configur `_ion. The variance for garage to house setback is no longer necessary. I will review the two issues of easements and hardcover separately: A. tardcover The applicant has revised hardcover percentages downward by eliminating a portion of the addition between t!te house and the garage, which is virtually all in the 75-250' setback zone. They have also reduced the deck nearest the lake to be 8' instead of 11' out from the house. However, this results only in a hardcover decrease of 6 s.f. from the first proposal, in the 0-75' zone. In reviewing the applicants revised proposal and going over hardcover numbers again, staff noted that the figures and percentages in the first proposal were probably slightly incorrect. Those have been corrected (I think) ane the new revised proposal added, yielding the following tables Total Original Corrected Hardcover lot 1st Revised Existing Proposed Proposal Pro Allowed it01 ()282 s.f.) (3244 s.f. ) (3248 s.f.) (3242 s.f.) (0) 75-250' 49.0% 46.6% 44.4% 38.9% 25% (1296 s.f.) (1234 s.f.) (1177 s.t.; (1032 s.f.) (663 s.f.) As you can see, in the 0-75', there r- only a minor decrease in hardcover proposed, about 40 a.f. frog the erx-stinq. In the 0-75' and 75- 54' amine, tbo total hardcover to reduced ray shout 266 s.f. from the Zoning File #1280 June 15, 1988 Page 2 of 3 existing, or a removal of about 1/5th of the ;,re -existing hardcover percentage in the 75-250' cone. Regarding structural hardcover, refer to the following table: Structural Hardcover Corrected lot Revised Existing Proposal Pro�sal 0-75' (N) TTI3 s.f. 2140 s.f. 2134 s.f. 75-250' 637 s.f. 722 s.f. 637 s.f. 0-75' (S) 0 s.f:. 0 s.f. 0 s.f. 286� 2771 s.f. (+912 s.f.) (+821 s.f.) This table indicates that in the 0-75' zone, card ly any of the originally propos d structural hardcover has been eliminated. In the 75- 250' zone, the new proposal eliminates all the previously proposed additional structural hardcover, leaving only the existing garage. Sine your last meeting, it appears that approximately 91 s.f. of structural hardcover have been eliminated from the proposal. Tn� current proposal res ''s in 42% more structural hardcover than -xists now. D. Rassn"t Issue Reg& -ding the easements on the property, applica. provided staff with the 2 documents which are noted as memorials on tier Certificate of. Title. The first one is the easement referred to by Bill Franklin why, appeared at your last meeting. That easement was granted in 19i8 when applicant's property was sold by its original owner (who r lso apparently owned property to the north on the point, and perhaps owned the entire ooint). Tha sellers, Mr. i Mrs. Boxrud, reserved an easement over Lot 20 o that they -ould continue to access their property on the point. That easement is described as shown -)n Exhibit C. That easement 46 for 'driveway purpose.' and would not be excluded from the applicants dry buildable area for purposes of this application. There is some question of the validity of that easement given that it does not describe which properties are benefited by the easement, and only names the people who are benefited. However, this easement probably has been and will continue to be in effect to serve the various properties pas' applicant's property. Deteraination of the validity of such an easement is not within the City's purview at this time. The second document provided is not an easement as su(,h, but is a copy of a mortgage agreement between 2 financial corporations, regprding the eale of Lot 30, Baldur Park, and the description on which describes an "**sent over applic&nt.s pr cty. Interestingly, there is no document filed against the title o Oplicants propert, that ever granted the described *seem to Lot 30. Because of that, this easement is also of questionable va--Jity. However, its language also discusses merely an Zoning vile 11280 June 15, 1988 Page 3 of 3 easemert for driveway purposes, hence neither of the two easements discussed in applicants chain of title have a significant effect on this application. They m�j have a significant effect in the future development of properties to the ,forth of applicants property. Note that one of Mr. Franklin's concerns was that applir-Ant +ould remove gravel or hardsurface from the area Franklin current s for access to his properties. The fact is, applicant cannot lega emove hardcover existing outside her property boundaries, and probably ..uuld not remove hardcover within her property that is used by any easement holders. The current proposal does not indicate that any removals which would be detrimental to any potential easement holders are proposed. Staff a adatio, Staff notes again thAt the magnitude of the proposed decks is of prime concern. Most of the 3' narrowing of the deck at the lakeside of the house was taken up by additional stairway located in the same general area. Staf f would suggest that a deck of no more t�• ^ 1' in width be a 1 lowed on the lakeside of the house, with the stairwa a' ocated to the end of the douse and incorporated into the new deck strL re at that location. Since the setback between garage and house now does not need a variai:e, the, requested variances are as follows: 1. Additional structure in 0-75' zone. 2. 30.0% hardcover in 0-75' zone. 3. 36.9• hardcover in 75-250' zone (25% allowed). Staff would again ask Planning commission to review Exhibit J, and note that the revised proposal which requests 31.7% overall hardcover on the property, is ir the high range of percentages allowed in variances in similar situatit.ns. Again, consider the visual and enviromental impact of this application in relation to the property owners rights. P C. • to - ZQ - 0 9- .13 VM 4 Feot. / 46A N r- �k "0tf. QRIOW/an.. �gpa,�.�;,j MMMM Mib rz / 0, J C- e,7 / -s4,, P.,� Nza-wc ir--t�, sr- e L*tj cAto-, pw s - '-Do. C"k'-' 04 " rxiv - r-5 DOONO FOOL hft 14, P2eP714 L 7 use- ao — e-o : - . Co --) r) —/yr c .(. ox-",D) s -mrm- 4artbbtcwftt4 ohm 7; f#wwdwj *� -now& 0 J lew ft r; 13i3 196g 32`f y ZI57 IDS? Z-9 l(o I ot$ p 3►2 &~l 395 0.1 V. (aI (, y g %) 4 EXN. A - (-1s-ss 01 _to 0 R �� *A �m 6-Is-as MIL 7-7 4. I � t / Nub `\ e h %o AA JI 10...,r,.�..,. 2- gt'Z`�d ryx�y 3 xq 3 X/9 3 X 1 Z,.- �spy 2:7 2G.�-,�zy.3 � G►�,7 D-'7S 7r e ry F G x s M IX -Tf.tro,: 1031 1 SQ dwGCr VAX#- 1 er PAA-) V*w ^WA A. — .. it wb MG !'Q� Per C06"eve: (1/r1y) wa ! N• w _ (� l�DutrtbJ S i..aa %xii�+,(srso�+(6ri��j i '±r aso ,I IF "y :µi+n+c ti LANc!s s� P�wr+ c — ` 24. 611,91r) e t(. :I+-4pOC C I! NO rXN 'rot At t sr*kG y� e0 s �. tirrw, p LA'f dr�MM� dr�MM� -- .?711 e Gusr so v & TrSON, P.A. ArTMINF." AT IAW GREGORY D. GUSTAFSON SLITS 411 I"IEL R. 9YSON 7400 METRO BOULEVARD WIU.LAA N. HANICHT EDINA. MINNE90TA 66/16 I FAX�(81� ja�.1410 JOSEPH J. DEIOIS, JR. !— SARAH Z P.RICKSON TELEPHONE: (612) 915-7277 1 - Jur,r 10, ;988 Mr. Michael P. Gaffron Assistant Planning & Zoning Adminstrator City of Orono City Hall P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Wendy Weihe (Easement Problem Question) Our File No.: DRT-87-4388 Dear Mike: I have enclosed here++ith pho•:ocopies of the easements which appear of racord against Wendy Weihe'1: property. These easements are filed as Document No. 2513998 and Document No. 1440581. After revie- of the enclosed, please contact me with regard to you comments. Sincerely yourF, GUSTAFSON & TYSON, P.A. D el R. `,'yson DRT:kay Enclosure cc^: Wendy Wei -he 5H1 MORTGAGE J'OS MIM IGAlil I. suede Iht. I t `h Sept^Idxer dat I,1 M I Maera the M.."Far W, NDOCO FIWWCIAL WRPCMATiDN, A ML4V9CIiA Q>WATI.(jN Ihnein "B/wruucr"). and IM• Sl.eljafrr, 1111DW1.3T HI:I,I:NA SAVINGS ANI) LOAN .ASSMIA111)N OU MINNI AMN.I.S. a ►Yer)elwa...rt twrrnvrd and rti.ue,g ulkoer tar iaLa I no. I'NI(M) SIATI SIN' AMUMICA, aherar alhkraa is I1101 NK'I1.1.41 STALL. MINKLAI'IN IS, MINNII%Of A thetrin " I.rntAr"t 1S'In NI N rfawal to ledehled In I.en lrr In the l.rin:Ipal aum al NiNF;�'rQm, I ar► NW. AND -I DA00 ......................... d.11yd September 1I 1991 Ikdlu., rherh IndcMcdnc.% i% rrhkaovol by IMwhwtrel, 'a Se I r -sn "N,re"). prtwidrnp hr nu�Qthly .Izlall�ntfT . , •MINI Saw Inomm. MINI the Mlum�r ,4 Ihr I"'NeJMr . It MN MbIMer i�.,,J, due aml Payabk Jin UCI 1. 11 19e4- ... ....... .... .. III SIt 1 aI n, Lrmkt lei thr rrrte)nwni of the 11-JeNedrleta etldeewad At th- N,we, r,Ili Iltt yc►1 11K1e1M. Ilh' f4y ntent .-f all Ihare wnta, r-Ith Inlm,l themm, ad'ofKol In aa'C.tfdancor htre*ut, It, Iwl,thtt the wturily .tf Ihit A:twgase. anf the FwI1IaYnlMae III the clwenanla and arreemen1% TIC B.wrltre► hatrtn ctlnj&incd, ate' (h) the rerr 4 _ y future adraeaYa. (ere-• ehrfttrn. made l Stornme. by Lrndrr Iurwant to pjajrleplt :I berral /n "Fulury ea herehyl�ra an f E-Insey kt (.ender. rich prtwet of Lek, the foll"wl"S If ribed t'htf'�y Imated In the C',. Stae .If Mt :Uva: __LQL.3). Buck 1, Park" according to V* rote. Dirt them ,together with an eas wenf over a Jod initig T p T�systea) incll.'in: septic tank and drain field, includin; the :-ight of ingress and rg_ross to arinU— xi repair said system. Together v1th a now.wrlusive easement for driveway purposes over a strip of land 11 feet in width, the center line the►tlnf t`, described as follows: CotteencLis at the Northwesterly corner of Lot 20 Gtock 1, "Baldur 't..x"; the e Southeasterly along the Southwesterly line of said Lot 20 a distance of 2, i.:t to tle point of beginning of the line to be descrioedt thence at an angle the left of 132' 10' a distance of 32.18 feet; thence at an angle t,. ae r.ght of 14' 53' a distance of 47.1 feet; :hence at an able t, the left of 14' 53, a distance of 40.5 foot; thence at nrl angle to the left of 26' 3S' a distance of 3S.47 feet to a point on the Northwestorl— tint of ,.ot 21 in said Block 1 ­Lstant 122.7 feet North- easterly of the Northt,estc,ty corner of sold Lot 21; thence at an argle to the 1,7ft if 14. 11' a distaoc.•' of 212 feet, thence at an angle to the loft of 14, 2r' a als_ tance Of 21S feet twerst or less to the Southeasterly line of LOt 3- Block 7la2.' r Park" aa,. 0-ire terminating. ;EP,1 7 t�8i-�a tt 1� , �A--14 whkh hit Ilk arWta71a W. Wo. PFAW..P#rk R00 1"X$1.. . e, 5I+kwtt IWO MN .61 1 burin "tarp r . A4kke-A .Sear t♦.a � Carl IMI11Ma NIb ON Ihr iA$prwrlWwa'a%U tee hrhaf$.-t .f.clod Inn the pr-1)nVty, a" an ralrnerra., r*4%. .Ir•)wfa r,.Iara. ft-"%, hlyiNlrs. alhw'hd, 14 rW P% rohta real pn4ifo, via % oa4't r�4'+ly, sell aeafc, Mow%. MI sa htltal . r%-w .r hen ,den atlarkd Of filer M►vtft). ear nt a e.:., h$rludtng rrlwacrehr"4a aa.i adowil•t Illt-neat, ► AN h• d►. ektf u/ 1% tale, , An a ran al "k (rrN'rtt) rwrov- the, hltwlRatr aalf all d 4 6artr k'1- kleslnr will, .aa1 r—ferm law lir Ire. anal ealak A 6% M000llopW A to a '.aarl.•id I So. heheia rcfctrwi ru in far -or!,", Il,wh.art ytaaa,traM• 60 111e1004ea do to" wind d Nan r-ta►r '<ra-h; Saw. :rd sad M, tha tool$$ le $Few an►I,.•natt Ow �ftg,m.♦N�). the law fhywr,I rlwraiwh 1, owl Iha• Mrwc,.�•. taut s'drew, W 40.1ml ntl Ntwt'+r^•: fl► II.• 111S '•�^7 aglow TIN 04WI,, real knoll 4. whptt M 3aa taken' Claw,.,. ♦ "kfaw . s ..t»t� d any WMKMA 11a a I r A• M HIM too swam tattaaitaat tail a tMr Or Fees Nw 9w SnkntMff.. 0.4 SIA. r--t—�.. y - - - • ar . ,.Ise . Arlletd N. Dsxrud 41d Meyeelle S. Cleared. besband and •Ile, efarC...et N Rie nepla I .W A„A @f - >' lnmeote r.,*log ./ 00 OW pre, sea .Lobs werrla a1r nd rje . rerr In. busbetld and ulco. IN'nn-pin a" Y- -• -/wC-..Ir./ . Ylefrl seta s..n.f of IA- --a I••.f. Mmumr*. r'+l me mid p�loa of me p w w, to -.-td...fl-. offA-..-. a/ CXr DCLS.A4 A:.W OTI"- VALUABLE -Cf-ID'-'SAIICMS• - - • - - - wpiuw M Lh-e 1. Aad ru fA• -.Id Mwi.. -/ w.ra.d pow, fA. r.ari/f rA..w/ 1. fr..vfh, .rl ..+l .•I f,d, M 4.-41V 0--'. L..plw, .off, 0.4 Coomp w.f. fA- "Q P.,#,.. of /t.• 4—d pow r.-w.I. 4+1 r1 .. f..a+f. Ia soon- . fA4, o..1fa•. #Ad .redo••- of ..N pert. fA. A— 4.4 .•/ f.vYIA. �^ +. ran—. *to I►. f.w.tA or Parris at Na /p.0 *adIn./ ... M. rw.rf ^I -d XWe of .Mlana.flo..f.rrifr . /all-.-, f..-I :rL 1sf:tr (20). ?lrek ft- (1). In Maldur ark, 't to and r-•-^rlrr I- ,crartrr% ---In,, t4-i^ sewn-, t`+ . ry •et'! p.-•'-• Lr:` tt- ..-lr- 4ri as-I&I "I t' survlver, an as for dr!••-..v• ••�-;.o +••rv.- t`st ;or,- •1 sold lot do-erlb-d .�Ilr•v; `•oc:.rr ' •L ,�- :ruthohst-rev corn+r rl said LrL :Or Lh-MC 'iertha-•L-rll• en i•- ..^,o•ILh•-st-rlT )In- 1-1 sold Lot 20. at.ntant 45.0 toot• a+L-rlj Lr a ,f'lnt on Lhq Fnrt9Is+v►-rl) 1!r oL.nt _(' dt't.r.L 3^.f :^et ::rrV%-..L-rlr ;.ve Lhw Srat!west+r)y enre.r rl sold Let ^; ;!:.rr• 1rr :C.ov i-rev eon th- !•or th.e•a-rl/ line of sold Le: It. 11-:.nL I. t`'-re- !wu:`.rest-r:r to V.- ,16C. of--rinrtn/ a1. no- 1 11 ikut, us! Viet part of Let Twontlr-one (PI). Block Crr. (1) Is Balder ff.k doscr11+ 4 .- 1011••.as Lh Cn<•-nelef, at - ►-one-r lino ee a!t- Morthoaat--lp errr•-i ni $all If•t :111 Loh-nN en sold lino dl-tent &0.0 1•.-L t- th• �ert!.Is-storlf corrw- el .wld Let 21( tA-nee _'otfth.ost-rly an th- --:'+e•at-rlj lire of -04!1 tort :l. llsL.nt 23. to-tl 0.-rota•t-- -irt on Lw- 3oW9,naaat+rlT Itn- GC13 to-t 3eetEsrostorl7 'roe t - •.r-L�• -t- ter-•- .j t•.•n. •:or th+wet-^11 on th- 1h-.. t'rev I',,- .� t1• pl.r -I b-rt-rtnr. We Ases no Is bb ' .of dlaete. ►.0thoo .fita .// N• �a aft .au, • mi... Isom hdandia/ ar .. "Va...rywfaf.f. f, to fa- af- p►.-afa N of cord poet taw- a-- f...: A. .v.► N /rM pf.� .d w Aw►...d ar fr ./ a ...d wr, rrvfe.. M- s.I pa •z..r .•......, ... e-ado f as pal Swase . a-d oat of fr..af• .a .0. J.d sA- swd .meld 1. spawn! t p. ' t , _ s 11s 3etrsd p••f S-a./ w /-. p.w..�� ttieLael•-a, t,n lr ....a.of ../a f►. amid ...ar N the ....d taw, se-i... trot M• of -o.J pews., •d to. 1r . . ad a.if►- N fa. a.r.err, eAd Cbo 1 are .vU gird M /•- ✓ w Ldf ad /wr.« ./a.�.i .. ►. ve !'•'f net..o .dl ad ...... w Mr 1. ~a— aa.! /war +/a.�.1. ad f�N fA. •.r . /... /.... -Ise ,.....r..,.,.� L: fa. a1 4 fee -ad .d w.a.d 1o.& aad .. K. a..ff a+d f-a....al. o- ...I p•.f... N fa- 'Ward a.w, taw- a fro fa. -Is.vs •1 a" saw.a "'j a... r "'i .r f.../ ... w•.I.a►, afefwl an I►.... faa•/offa .fafwfaf or f-feai.. fav w4•ev r oaf pow I►+.-./. oiJk .f r .1 aap• Lr fti-/a.v ..aahaawl, w r.a pow lea of fa. A-W f..- .d' woo-W ..A & food be Comp w! INM►-•. ru rd raw 1. a -/ fa- Ati pare he ►We Mv)p<o.�f.�►. ►a..d• w f•e • r per Nr ..vra ...iw.. Its. ,1Z. Xf Walt of 161"R ds, (� 1� awk-1712-PA90 •••,, •1 ltta►cct211 J a. Al. yr M 1rf_ -- - to.. ta.. 1101— w e DCLer}} fvhlll __-tW,-e.df. -WCe..y.lweftedty&VP--d ArnQ14 .'l. bo rud M ASS" 1L_A_ft4sudv bu8Or►4._&aA--.1^vt w w. rwwwa M M At Mr.e� -• _ -..-_IrO.i M ad who esr.od hMM+/ bub—, d .ANAW&* Mid 16 1 /�✓ �/ r... •. es" rr N.li p4o .w .d dad .r.ee7 I.&W. 111.4 f•r totem maue 1► s7 d swl t5- 1}q et 1t.30 olelei d•� lFaIND Nld. 1 ail . r• !"e" ° ►..'— ;!,kj.j o1 a Book-1792-Page 7 Irbis Jnbtntult r.4tb1. flat _ dd..��♦ _ Als , ,.Le r,,,,,,,, a.'...1 ■. b. e111 flits .f 06. nr.„..e w r...q+._-- -- - —__._...+ w.I »aee.rt. .... Low .f a&. r-, r..i r./ ar •.. CW—ft .t Mwl1a _-_ _ • - ...i i.r of i4www �... s .i ,........� e.•a wa.r.dr+ nr M. odd PS.. Lr ./ .tt /— reel r �.iMY1.. .i w w•. •/ .. Un O.LI.&VMILANW IOl snl /&lwkl..[..dderotlS"a A9l1JU- r .... tltw A. t-./ rdd ti dlr .44 P r 7 .I r..—a so-E. , " v ►.mS, 0..•, A.0 , A.U. rd C.. Y .ft A. Mod r+ f ./ +. --w ..et SLID adn.." .d4.. ►,n ..0 r. a.m • e.•-f of %..d Ird./ ..d k...t r A. Cw MWVAWL e.d 1111.6..f /t..—+1 d....a.d W 60*mrqd its (t), !lock Owb red ten (t), ILettrao ►M'e to MS•wer+ils, ereerdl.t to the r14t tkrewf or rite e..d K reewd to the oftSes of tw. lelotsr at One" to end for PA OPLe Goonty, /l.tt-Mte, t..eluove a_ pert r prt•.w of sq Street or •Ile. ad)e.'-t1 to esld prwl-es. Swetatere .ete"d w to be ..e.ted, tt.etr.r rtt► all r14te, trletlsd.s, •emote .td gpvwtaraiwo. V...ewto ett.d.ed w ►olwsIftry. WAjSet to a eertolo first rrts."o to iB.weeot• /odStel 5e-1.1tfr wd Leto u oS. l t / S.o wet of reeved l..kyrt t• i..•S end —"soe-.te. Lulvdt..t d.ferrwd ►V--•ts for "metal ee.eewSwit, —. pet pW-ablo, nbj.et L v&A41I Yle evoreeywtee to dot. fe - i y •r AM 401) mom !o Mid. ryrlr r an w boom— od .Ar•4t.0000 ...weu dr • eque .w-w+y, to w .w dr. 7 .J *• •••A dR1a rs ereLo. s/ +r N era Ir IM�MTtM..M1i -1�a down .- .:..A &#ftO11Mww 1b� .rr dwW to tw of tit bedo 0 f amodw eflowaft 0" r s— 011101 14" r ON 4MO ed.w1► w Sri.. to .. M. MID for *a He edswe dp Ar /rwie I dleSeee� •dry G MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 20, 1988 #1278 TIMM CONTINUED Gaffron explained the request for an average lakeshore setback variance and a 75-250' hardcover variance to construct a deck. He reviewed staff's recommendation for removal of hardcover to reduce the 75-250' hardcover to 38.2% from the existing 43.9% and proposed 46.nt. Mr. Timm stated he had a plan that would reduce the 75- 250' hardcover to 36%. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval per staff's recommendation of hardcover removal to 38.2% final 75-250' hardcove_ . Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0. i #1280 .: NSNCY L. "IRE 6 BALDUR PART( ROAD VARIANCE SDCOND RSVINW Wendy Weihe and her architect, Paul Nielsen, were present for this matter. Mr. Nielsen reviewed the revised plan which reduces the structural hardcover. He referred to Exhibit J and the variance granted at 1432 Baldur Park Road in 1988. Kelle, noted that the revised plan consists of a net reduction of hardcover, of which approximately 91 s.f. is structural hardcover. He found no problem with the hardcover proposed in the revised plan. Regarding the easement issue, Gaffron noted that neither of the two documents on the property's Certificate of Title have a si.;- i f icant effect on this application, but may have a s. ,nificant. effect in the future do!velopment of prope- ties to the north of applicants property. Mr. Franklin submitted a copy c.f his warranty deed to Planning Commission to make here aware of the 45' easement for roadway purposes w ch wi11 greatly reduce applice. t's green area when hip operty is developed. Mr. den Hoag stated he had a *great in the lots on the point and felt that beca of the lack of facts known by the City, the City st ! be very careful and not grant rights and variance applicant without the facts being resolved. MINUTES OF THE PI.ANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 20, 1988 #1280 WRIHE CONTINUED Kelley felt that the easement issue was for the property owners attorney's to work out and that the Planning Commission must deal with the facts as presented. He noted that the applicants proposal to reduce the hardcover will benefit the adjacent property owners. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval of the revised plan and hardcover variances per staff recommendation, subject to no additional hardcover being allowed on the property. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 1. Bellows voted nay finding there is a real difference between hardcover and structural hardcover, and felt the plan wag far too ambitious for this property. Notion carried. Ms. Weihe proposed to have a meeting with staff, Mr. Franklin, and their attorneys to resolve the easement issue. f1290 JAMS A. IORENCE 4460 NORTH SHORE DRIVE VARIAIICE/COWDITIOIIAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 7s45-7:46 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailinq were noted. Mat,usth stated that the applicant has rcquestea that this application be tabled at this time and the applicant may formally withdraw the application. There were no comments from the puk.lic regardinq this matter. it was moved by Johnson, seconded ',y Ike 1 ley, to table Application 01290. Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0. #1291 A JIM IVRRSM 2 * 3 5 CASCO POINT ROAD VAR IANCR PUBLIC H;ARI NG 7 : 47-7 s S5 The Affidavit of Publication an.? ' if ieate of Mailing were noted. Mrs. Alfred Iverson was present fc:t o.i matter. Mabusth explained the request a 1.1• (321 s.f.) hardcover variance in the 75- setback area to construct a two-story addit' io the existing st ruct i re . 3 ZONING FILE NCB. 1 280 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of. Notice: 6/21/88 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Wendy Weihe 1376 Baldur Park R..ad Wayzata, MN 55391 ---------------.....---------------------------------------------------------- TYPs OF APPLICATION: Variance DATB-Ul-MEETING: 6/20/88 VOTE: 6 For 1 Against Planning Coassission rec�snds the following: Approval subject to conditions noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Recommended approval of hardcover and lakeshore setback variances for revised proposal, subject tc hardcover removals which result in final 0-75' hardcover of 30.0% (3,242 s.f.) and 75-250' hardcover of 38.9% (1,032 s.f.). Planning Commission further recommended that hardcover on this property never be allowed to exceed the square footages approved with this variance. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council July 11, 1988; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Connission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Comission. W�►i� `1 W �7f� /Z�? u E`ST � To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & :oninq Administrator Dates July 21, 1988 Subject: #1280 Wendy Weihe, 1376 Baldur Park Road - Variance Application - Hardcover and structural setback variances to construct additions to existing home. Zoning District - I,R-1C, single family, � acre, sewered List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Hardcover Summary Exhibit B - Proposed Site Plan Per Planning Commission Recommendation Exhibit C - Planning Commission Action Notice Dated 6/21/88 Exhibit D - Memo & Exhibits of 6/15/88 Exhibit E - Planning Commission Minutes of 6/20/88 & 6/6/88 Di sr-ussion - Plevac review the m..!mo and exhibits of June 15th, 1988. The applicant is proposing to cor"+— ct additions to the existing house which result in a net decrease in hardeo, er in the 0-75' zone f rom 30.4% to 30.0%, and a net. decrease in the 75-250' zone from 49.0% to 38.9%. Planning Commission discussions on this applica*ion revolved around the fact that virtjally all of the new construction takes place in the 0- 75' sore, and that. the decreases in hardcover are the result of removing rock and plastic grade level hardcover areas in exchange for greatly increasing the structural development on the lot. The applicant's original proposal was rejected by the Planning Commission, and subsequently the applicant submitted a revised proposal for which Planning Commission recommended approval on a vote of 6-1. The minority opinion held `)y Planning Commissioner Bellows, was that even under the revised proposal, the intensity of development, including added structural hardcover on the property, was to great. During this review, staff has continued to be of the opinion that removal of an existing upper level deck in order to construct room additions, in conjunction with replacement of that deck over areas not currently in hardcover, is somewhat excessive. Staff would suggest that decreasing the site of the proposed deck is perhaps the most apl.ropriate method to lessen the degree of visual bulk and hardcover percentage on this unique but sensitive lot. Matt -- at ion - The Planning Comwission recommended approval of the variances to allow new structure entirely within the 0-75' setback zone per the site plan attached as =xhibit H, and r*comsend*d approval of hardcover of 30.0• in the 0-75' son* and :39.9% in the 75-250' son*. Staff feels that the hardcover decreases propcsed are sppropriate, but would recoss-nd that further decreases in the structural portions of the propos*d hardcover be considered. A resolution r4of letting Counci l's action will he drafted for yr,ur next sooting, EXHIBIT A zoning File #1280 1376 Baldur Park Road HARDCOVER SUMMARY Corrected Revised Proposal Existing 1 st Proposal (P.C. Recommendation) S.F. S.F. S.F. 0-75' (N.) Structural 1,313 2,140 2►134 Non -Structural 1,011 150 150 TOTAL 2,324 2,290 2,284 0-75' (S.) Structural 0 0 0 Non -Structural 958 958 958 TOTAL 956 958 958 0-75' (N.iS.) Structure 1,313 2,140 Non -Structural 1,969 1,108 TOTAL 3,292 (30.4%) 3,248 (30.11) 75-250' t�ructtural 637 722 Non -Structural (161 455 TOTAL 1,298 (49.01) 1,177 (44.4%) Tani* Lott Structural 1,950 (14.50) 2,862 (21.3%) No►. -Structural 2,630 (19.61) 1,563 (11.6•) TOTAL 4,S80 (34.1%) 4,425 (32.91) SONY ARr%S: 0-7;,' N. • (,900 •.!. 0-75' S. - 3,900 s.l. 0-75' M.i8. • 10,600 •.t. 75-250, • 2,650 •.E. antirw Lot 13,450 s.t. 2,134 1,108 3,242 (30.00) 637 395 1,032 (38.90) 2,771 (20.60) 1,503 (11.21) 4,274 (31.99) MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MBRTING BRI.D JULY 25, 1988 1207 GENE SCANLON 2815 CASCO POINT ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION 12474 The Applicants, were present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that *his is a request for construction, including hardcover, in the 01-75'zone, resulting from the July 23, 1987 storm. They would like to replace the deck, which was 210 sq.ft., with a deck that is 165 sq. ft. The existing shed that was also destroyed by the storm will now be tucked under the deck. Councilmember Goetten stated that she does not feel the resolution should include any lanquage pertaining to the health of the Applicant. She roes not want to ,set any precedent by allowing such lAnguage. Therefore, sub -paragraph E under Finding A3 of the Resolution, shall be removed. It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to approve the Resolution 02474 as amended. Motion, Ayes-4, llaysl0, Motion passed. #1260 VWWY WBIRE 1376 94LDUR Ph" ROAD IA�E The Applicant was present for this matter. City Administrator bernhardson explained that. this was a request for hardcover and structural setback variances to construct an addition to the house, as well as decks all around the house. A significant portion of the existing house already tits in the 0'-75' Eon*. The proposal will reduce the amount of total hardcover in the 0'-75' zone from 30.40 to 30.01 and a net decrease in the 75'-250' from 49.00 to 30.91. There is an increase In the amount of structural hardcover Applicant pointed out that the deck is already there, not proposed. They plan is to reduce the gigs of the deck. Councilmember Goetten questioned whether it was necessary to have the roast improved. Assistant toning Administrator Gaffron stated that it was not. a problem at this time. it was moved by Councilsember Goetten, seconded by Councileember Peterson, to approve the Variance for Wendy Wsiher. notion, Ayes•4, >4ays•4. # 1291 AfdRM IYUROM 293S CAKED PUI1" MUD •ARIAMM 2MMOLUTION 02475 Its. Iverson and the Contractor wore present for this meeting. This is a request for hardcover variance in the 75'-2'SO' =one• The, planning Commission directed chat this additional construction and remodeling be dui*sa witkmt increasing the amount of hardcover beyond 19.41. Councilmember Callahan stated that after visitinsq with Mr. Twe'tson. there was confusion as to how bawould like to proceed. Apparently the calculations used for deterslning *stating hardcover did not include the landscaping plasti- around the house. it did include the aspralt pathway APPLICATION NO. 1280 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystl Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 7/28/88 -------.-_.------------------------------------------------------------------ TO: Wendy Neihe COPIES: 1376 Baldur Park Road Wayzata, MN 55391 rM OF APPLICATION: variance DATE OF Kff"ING:-7/25/"9 VOTE: 4 For 0 Against CMINCIL ACTION W)TION: Approval. of revised jroposal per i-lanninq Commission recommendation. A resolution for api.rova 1 wi 1 1 be presented to the Counc.i 1 as a "Consent Agenda" item on August 8, 1988. Since this is not expected to he a discussion item, applicant need not be present. You must apply for and obtain a buildinq permit prior to commencement of construction. (The building permit application is a separr-e application from the zoni-g variance application.) If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they a.e available from the City Recorder or City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. To: Mayor Grabek 6 Orono Council Members Pr(m: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & 7oning Administrator Dates August. 3, 1988 Subject: N128C Wendy Weihe, 1376 4ialdur Park RoAd - Variance - Resolution Consent Agenda Attached is a resolution for al.hrovaI of the hardcovez and setback variances granted to Wendy Weihe at your last meeting on a vote 1 to 0. Proposed motion: Moved, _ seconded, to atlrove resolution 4 granting hardcover and setback variances to Wendy Weihe, 1376 Naldur Perk Road. ayes, nays. 5472789 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COONCIL. NO TRANSFFA ENTERED r r all, A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZOP-MG CODE "-- DEfUT11 SECTION 10.22, S'lB' .VISION I i 2 AND SECTION 10.55, -;UBDIVISIOII 8 - FILE #1280 WHEREAS, Wendy Weihe (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner -)f the rroperty located at 1376 Baldur Park Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 20 and that part of Lot 21, Block 1, "Baldur Park" described as followss beginning on the meander line at the Northeasterly corner of said Lot 21; thence Northwesterly on sa'.d line a distance of 50' to the Northwesterly corner of said Lot, 21; thence Southwesterly on the Northwesterly line of said Lot 21 a distance of 23'; thence Southeasterly to a point on the Southeasterly line of said Lot 21, 66.5' Southwesterly from said Northeasterly corner; thence Northeasterly on said Southeasterly lines 66.5' to the point of beginning, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "thee property'lt and WERRSAS, the applicant has app 1 ied to the :'ity for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions l i 2 and Section 10.55, Subdivision • to allow the construction of additions to the existing residence, such additions being less than the required 75' setback from the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka and constituting hardcover in the 0-75• and TS-e501 lakeshore setback sones in excess of the 01 and 250 hardcover perc*ntages normally allow 4 in those respective stones. Ilin"sot a t no". Pigs. Ls IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Jrasses, ►I ND I tAW 1. This application was reviewed as tonin+q Pile 01200. ` 2. The proferty is located in the LR-1C single Family Lakeshore RssiAmt is l tor►: ng District. 3. The Orono Planning Commissian revfewe9 this apt I icstian on 'OR* 20. 196S, and recommoneded att rova I Of the pro;used variances based opm the following findings) 1 A) The area of the t;rot,erty is apprCulmotely 11,450 s.f., of which 10.!©41 s.f. is located within tees 0-W setback sexo. Page 1 of S City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO 2483 B) The existing residence structure is located 28' from the shoreline with a second story deck located 20' from the shoreline. Existing hardcover on the property in the 0-75' zone is 30.4% and in the 75-250' zone is 49.0%. C) The proposed additional structure includes completion of the second story over the entire existing house, with a 3-level addition between the existing house and the garage, plus a new second story deck at the northwest end of the house. None of the additions will be closer to the lake than the existing house and deck. D) The applicant's original proposal showed a reduction in hardcover in the 0-75' zone from 30.4% to 30.1%, and from 49.0% to 44.4% in the 75-250' zone. The initial Planning Commission review of that proposal resulted in lirection from the Planning Commission to further reduce hardcover on the property, hence Applicant returned with a proposal for 30.0% in the 0-75' zone and 38.9% in the 75-250' zone. The Planning Commission found this substantial hardcover reduction to be a positive aspect of this application and recommended approval. E) Due to the fact that this property has lakeshore on 2 sides, with a relatively small area in the 75-250' settack zone, the property has some unique hardships in that it could not support any additions without varianc-s. F) The proposed additions will create no significant visual encroachment of views enjoyed by neighboring property owners, and will not be visually obtrusive within the landscape due to the topography within the immediately adjacent areas. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning districts that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring propertyt would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demon- strable hardship or diffieultyt is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeling with the spirit and intent of the toning Code and Comprehensive plan of the city. Page 2 of 5 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or mere of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal. Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivision 1 & 2 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit the construction of additions to the Existing residence which will constitute additional structure and hardcover in the 0-75' zone where no hardcover or structure is normally allowed, and which will constitute hardcover in the 75-250' in excess of the 25% hardcover normally allowed, subject to the following conditions: 1. Hardcover on the property is allowed only as follows and her the site plan attached as Exhibit A: House plus addition 1529 s.f. Deck plus stairs 605 i.f. Sidewalks 157 s.f. Garage 637 s.f. Driveways 1303 s.f. Retaining walls 43 s.f. Total 4274 s.f., of which 3242 s.f. is within the 0-75' lakeshore setback . ne and 1032 s.f. is within the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone. All other existing hardcover including decorative rock beds underlaid by plastic sheeting shall be removed prior to final inspection and occupancy of the additions. The applicant is advised that any future proposal to increase hardcover on the property will not be approved, but might be approved only in conjunction with concurrent removals of existing hardcover, resulting in no net increase of hardcover. 1. The applicant is advised that the lower floor level of the addition shall be at an elevation of 932.5' or higher. 3. The applicant is further advised that if for some reason the foundation of the existing house has to be replaced, that further Council review may be required to determine whether a relocation cf the house is required. 4. Authorities granted with this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be. exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August S. 1999). Page 3 of 5 C/ity of ORO O RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL_ NO. 2483 5. Violation of or nc.n-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shallautomatically terminate any authority granted herein, and .:hall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of herself, her heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees tu the recording of this resolution in the chalin of title of the property. k pted by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of August, 19 8 a iti ` t R i - i YA Clerk '- Jam R. GraMayor T,age 4 of 5 C Ity of OR O O RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO z4' STATE OF MINNESOTA i ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this / / +41 day of 198 before me�a Notary Public within and ?Zsaid county, personally appeared known to me to be the persons descri ed in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. IIOR ` MAAD ETA lN/ COUNTY Mr n mom saa STATE OF M.INNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) i q..4- NOTARY PUBLIC �_ �_ q'Q MY COMMISSION EXPIRES On this day of , 198 , before me a Notary Pu c rviti �n and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person a) descrIbed In and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY -ONIM19410W EXPIRES Page 5 +__! 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF ORONO ) I Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Orono with the original record of such resolution in the Minutes of the proceedings of said City Council at a weeting of said City Council held on August 8 lq e' , and that the same is a true and correct copy of said resolution was duly adopted by said Cit; Council at said meeting. In Witness Whereof. I have hereunto 30t my hand and sea! th w .9th , day of August 19" 4t MJ M 14 21 A54 7 2789 DOC f 10.00 of .x;. _ v etcow . qn Ap 'N'M1'p MINUTES OF RBGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MRRT:ING AUGUST 8, 1988 #1300 ANTHONY EIDEN CONTINUBZ) between shared boundaries of Lots 8 and 9 of Abingdon Glen. The pond will riot encroach into the wetland and will not affect the current drainage pattern of the existing or future drainfield areas. The Planning Commission approved this application. Maycr Grabek asked the applicant if he had the opportunity to review the Planning Commission's information and conditions of approval. Mr. Eiden had read the information and had no questions. There were no questions on behalf of the Council. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Mayor Grabek, to approve Resolution #2481, Conditio^al Use Permit, per Planning Lom►nission recommendations. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=0, Motior. passed. 1304 BLOONQUIST/SUPER VALU 3333 SHUREI.INE DRIVE VARIAXCB RESOLUTION f2482 The applicant was present for this matter. Acting City Administrator Gerhar6a�,-n explained that applicant was requesting a setback variance for a parking lot, which would involve a 0' setback where 20' is required. Applicant was also seeking a 3' setback variance for a pylon sign where normally 10' is required. The Planning Commission had previously recommended approval of this application. Mayor Grabek asked applicant if he had reviewed the material prepared for this meeting. Applicant stated he had reviewed the material and had no questions. It was moved by Councilmember Calla' -an, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve the variances requested by applicant, subject to those conditions set forth in Resolution f2482. Notion, Ayes-S, Nays-0, Motion passed. 11291 ALVIM I V Wd" 2935 CAMCO POINT ROAD VARIA M It was moved by Mayor Grab^k, seconded by Councilmember settles, to table this matter until the applicant can be present for thi4 awtter. Motion, Ayes-5, Nays-0, Motion passed. v6sto *i it NEIBE 376 EALD91k PAM RW1D *,TARIAXCs - IdBOLUTICAI i 2 4 8 3 J.L_._ra .. marod by Councilmember Nett lea, seconded by Couscilne�ir Peterson, to approve the hardcover and setback variances subject to the conditions set forth in Resolution f2403. Notion, Ayes•S, May**-0, Motion passed. 4 APPLICATION NO. 1280 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 15323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 8/15/88 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Wendy Weihe COPIES: 1376 Baldur Park Road Wayzata, MN 55391 + TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance --- --------------------------------------------------------------- -- DATE OF MEETING: 8/8/88 VOTE: 4 For 0 Against COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION: To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution previously mailed to you. Variance Approval is limited to the extent shown on approved plan and as noted in the approval resolution. Changes a,: approved plane are surject to further review by the City. Variance approval expires one year after date of approval. Permit application must be submitted no later than August 8, 1969. You must apply foi and obtain a building permit prior to commencement of construction. (The building permit application is a separate application from the zoning variance or conditional use application.) If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Recorder or City Clerk after review anl appzoval by the City Council. Please arrange to sign the 3 original resolution copies at the City Offices (Monday through "viday, 8:00 to 4:30). Al persons with an interest in the property must sign the resolutions. . lot -Al 42 oft ep KsooAZ 0 lo� 13 c A 4fj Ma. *OAS CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR WENDY L. WEIHE IN LOTS 20 and 21, BLOCK 1, "BALDUR PARK" HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ai 441r 2 2 ICA i .3 2�\\e\ 1 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of all of Lot 29 and that part of Lot 21, Block 1, .18a I do r Park'described as follows: Beginning on Lhe niCcluder line at the Northeasterly corner of Said Lot 21; thence Northwesterly on said line a distance of 50 feet to the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 21; thence Southwesterly on the Northwest- erly line of said Lot 21 a distance of 23 feet; thence Southeasterly to a point on the Southeasterly line of said Lot 21, 66.5 feet Southwesterly from said Mortheasterly corner. thence Northeasterly on said Southeasterly line 6b.5 feet to the point of beginning. the location of all existing buildings and a driveway. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. Scale: I" = 30' L s COFFIN & GRONDERG, INC. Date: 6-26-87 Iran marker found 0 Iron marker set 49arK ',. broncierg Keg. No.-IZP)b Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Planners Long Lake, Minnesota CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR WENDY L. WEIHE IN LOTS 20 and 21, BLOCK 1, "BALDUR PARK" HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA i '1=AbrnrR PAW Rv. Of+-0I ,MN. 5rv,391 ` f rn 1 90 I.n.e' l hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries Of all of Lot 29 and that part of Lot 21, Block 1, " Baldur Parlf'described as,follows: Beginning on the meander line at the Northeasterly corner of said Lot 21; thence Northwesterly on said line a distance of 50 feet to the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 21; thence Southwesterly on the Northwest- erly line of said Lot 21 a distance of 23 feet; thence Southeasterly to a point on the Southeasterly line of said Lot 21, 66.5 feet Southwesterly from said feet to the point of beginning. the location of all existing bull Northeasterly corner; thence Northeasterly on said Southeasterly line 6u.5 driveway. It does not purport to show any other improvements or edings and a ncroachments. Scale: 1" = 30' Date: 6-26-87 COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. a Iron marker found �G o Iron marker set arc ron erg eg. No: TZ755— Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Planners Long Lake, Minnesota CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR WENDY L. WEIHE INLOTS 20 and 21, BLOCK I, "BALDUR PARK" HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 4 sf•..w[ iltlotfrre /3fo�y.R.f0,!'4 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of all of Lot 20 dnd that part of Lot 21, Block 1, Baldur Park"described as follows: Beginning on the meander line at the Northeasterly corner of said Lot 21; thence Northwesterly on said line a distance of 50 feet to the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 21; thence Southwesterly on the Northwest- erly line of said Lot 21 a distance of 23 feet; thence Southeasterly to a point on the Southeasterly line of said Lot 21. 66.5 feet Southwesterly from said Northeasterly corner; thence Northeasterly on said Southeasterly line bu.5 feet to the point of beginning. the location of all existing buildings dnd a driveway. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. Scale: 1" = 30' J -- COFFIN 8 GRONBERG, INC. Date: 6-26-87"ICe: "'"""'^ a Iron marker found� o Iron marker set �, ron erg eg. o. Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Planners Long Lake, Minnesota CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR WENDY L. WEIHE IN LOTS 20 and 21, BLOCK 1, "BALOUR PARK" 13'76 $di{.pUft AAA JtD, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA OR4#40' NW, 6'9491 \FT�Nk R 117, , ;4IN wt o TO tt f;V0VFD I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey ..Of the boundaries of all of Lot 20 and that part of Lot 21, Block 1, lof Park'described as*follows: Beginning on the meander line at the Northeasterly corner of said Lot 21; thence Northwesterly on said line a distance of 50 feet to the North-?sterly corner of said Lot 21; thence Southwesterly on the Northwest- erly I,ne of said Lot 21 a distance of 23 feet; thence Southeasterly to a point on the Southeasterly line of said Lot 21, 66.5 feet Southwesterly from said Northeasterly corner; thence Northeasterly on said Southeasterly line 6b.S feet to the point of beginning. tire location of all existing buildings and a driveway. It does not purport :.0 show any other improvement, or encroachments. Scale: 1" 30' Date: 6-26-87 COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. 0 Iron marker found �.s.� 0 Iron marker se[ par ronTrg P,.,,y,-Wo D Engineers, land Surveyors, and Planners Long Lake, Minnesota CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR WENDY L. NE1HE IN LOTS 20 and 21, BLOCK I, "BALDUR PARK" � o 'nA ��•S� 1 ot� �L2C�L� E�i 22 A Ov�` I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of all of Lot ..Of 2p and that part of Lot 21, Block 1, Park"described as follows: Beginning on the meander line ac the Northeasterly corner of said Lot 21; thence Northwesterly on said line a distance of 50 feet to the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 21; thence Southwesterly on the Northwest- erly line of said Lot 21 a distance of 23 feet; thence Southeasterly to a point on the Southeasterly line of said Lot 21, 66.5 feet Southwesterly from said Northeasterly Corner; thence Northeasterly on said Southeasterly line 6b.5 feet to the point of beginning. the location of all existing buildir.Os and a driveway. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroaclimenfs. Scale: 1" = 30' Date: 6-26-87 "y:;�'-e: ""' "' COFFIN 8 GRONDERG, INC. o Iron marker found " � / o Iron marker se[ � 'Park b G p—ran erg Reg. o. I e/55 Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Planners Long Lake, Minnesota LAKE MIh SURVEY FOR: LAKE MINNETONKA BILL FRANKLIN / 7 / i6 lj SCRIP_1011 OF. RORK Locate easm —ts on Lots 20 and 21, Block I. BALDUR PARK, Hennepin County. Lor at road in area of lots 16, Bloch 1. through Lot 22. Block 1, BALDUR PARK. Locate ti•ia Mile on Lot 21 that is part of legal description. LEGAL OESCRIPTION OF EASEMENt FOR LOT 20 BLOCK 1 Lot Twenty :2n). Block One (1). in Paid- Part subject to and reserving in the nrdntors here;n, their assigns, ter• o iver of said parties, and the heirs and as5iyns of the survivor, an easemert ` driveway purposes over that portion of said lot deSC" ted as `oliow%: Covrenring at the Southeasterly corner of said Lot 27: ther,e Nnrtnwe'rterly on the Southwesterly line of said lot 20, dis to nt 45.0 feet. the, c, 'lortnea sterly to a point on the Northwesterly line of saiti Lot 20 drrtant 4I-4 feet Northeasterly from the Southwesterly corner of saiJ Lot then- Nor•hr.-terly on the Northwesterly line of said Lot 20. distant 60.0 feet: thence S iweSte, lj to the plat of beginning as now laid out, and That Da,•. , - Twenty-one i:!), Jlop. One (1) in Ba ldur Park described as follows: Cmro.nciar. at the Meander line nn the flor•thea sterly corner of said Lot tl: Thence 'le,thwesterly nn said line distant 50.0 feet to the North- rste,lj 10- cf Sa is 'Ot 21: thence ScItthwesterl, on the Northwesterly line of said lot %1, dis tart 23. feet; thence Southeasterly to a point on the Southeasterly line 6f:F feet Southwesterly from the Northeasterly corner; thence tic. thOasterly on the Southeasterly line 66.5 feet to the place of beginning. i here:: .-t, 1 i!j that •his [lets plan or report was I.repdred by nle o. tinder y direct saner': is on and that I a, a duly reglstered Land Surveyor under the Id Of the Sta tE Of F'i,ne,... Woodrow A. Gown =.L.S. ?eq. No. IS210 PU a� 10 60 sCaLE IN FE e DENOTES FOUND IRON V DEIIO'ES SET IRON W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC. 1 ` I ,/r,,•e. .. %— r C c/rF Mi ^0�E'r�N up tp , I •i r T m . i /I r�✓ A - - La11NG Lk IG • •=' / LOT Air7;AY 19, ri2r r 79 (Dx19nN6 aAP; 'w^TYA w-wu'u)i !LA4TW4NT- NDKTrt `.. 6�' aNEra+cY r.3 W owr V. % (DD• MA)(. (NtAN NT. WV" r K ;D COFfi1—) DCTW1:F3N wir 4 MAK K.4 PW'rKlh-(N"- .t/GL. VKIS) VrAL aJI.V14> AKDA (mZbfAlb.brDY0�02Z1C5> Tx & IN9V.0 I. >ITD rLAN 5ax^iCY i^.A•. I�P� � DUILDINy GrG'Jr/il., " oTL c"s 2 La 11K LGYtL pl v t,r0 (A � urrDEci.awr..�. •.I M� si a_ R ,\ o ISSUE/NEVISIONS li/- i3-Sa r / Residence Addition for Wendy Weih• 1376 Baidur Park Rd. / Orono, Minn. 66391 612/471-7851 .. •, .;1 i pis- � '�' � C . ''kE} NO cryx. G,{ \ .vim, ✓a = +,..,I•T-• �''-„ y-. � .YID - _ - Z .. � �. •. W ,w-Y«.: ��•nr" �' , --e :•EE..:.,.a l ..�.��zn-r;r.�•l .�•�-esv�� - � I i ., 40'IP I••aD OI �. n I HEME MY CERTOE T-T TNIE VIEK Y�CUIC�TpN M tlMlli Y1EE M[• Y� [D �Y NE 09 L�fNll NY pMCT SIM[INISIDN N'tl rII •lV DYET aEusraeo sewrtc[er uNDts Txt - --± Nxsa rasunar+asor� - DATE -TIED. NO.�_ �4- 9I oanwN =� T vzamrno WINEIONNA EFAC Lulq.nr e.r n— of 2 I 2 %b••r.p• ISSUE/REVISIONS Residence Addition for Wendy wain* 1376 Baldur Perk Rd. Orono, Minn. 55391 612/471-7851 fi[iY E[ETIEY Tn�i inn ILAN. (GIIK�TgN. M LLIDIrT .AY ILL SDI[MILOM AND TNNTfI •LI pTWly Tft Li a,(r $TATcd 4MWTA DATE _PEG. NO._ CHECKED IEOIE[ T n0 — of 2