The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09-15-2025 - Agenda Packet Planning Commission - PacketAgenda Planning Commission Monday, September 15, 2025, 6:00 PM 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 /oronomn.gov Audience Members: Information regarding each of the agenda items is available on the city website under meetings and in the public packet located in the lobby near the entrance. Applicants will be asked to move to the lectern to answer questions after staff presents the application. The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this agenda, they will be scheduled for an upcoming City Council meeting. A quorum of the City Council may be in attendance of a Planning Commission meeting to hear comments made, though no action or deliberation of the Council will occur. 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approval of Agenda 4. Approval of Minutes 4.1. Planning Commission Minutes of August 18, 2025 5. Public Hearings 5.1. LA25-000038, Grizzly Construction o/b/o James Morrison, 1384 Baldur Park Road, Variances, Public Hearing 6. Other Items 7. Adjournment Sign up for email notifications at https://www.oronomn.gov/ AGENDA ITEM Date: September 15, 2025 Title: Planning Commission Minutes of August 18, 2025 Presenter: Laura Oakden, Community Development Director Section: Approval of Minutes Purpose: Approve the Planning Commission Minutes 2. Planning Commission Action Requested: Approve the Planning Commission Regular Minutes of August 18, 2025 Exhibits 08.18.2025 PC Minutes Item: 4.1 K Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Monday, August 18, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Chair Bollis called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL Orono Planning Commission members present: Chair Chris Bollis, Commissioners Jon Ressler, Thomas Brandabur, Kelly Prchal, Sam Tift, and Shane Weltzin. Commissioner Andrew Jarnot was absent. Staff present: Community Development Director Laura Oakden, City Planner Melanie Curtis, and City Planner Matthew Karney. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Prchal moved, Ressler seconded, to approve the Agenda. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. 4. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 21.2025 Tift moved, Brandabur seconded, to approve the minutes of the Orono Planning Commission meeting of July 21, 2025. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1. LA25-000024, BOYER BUILDING CORP O/B/O JOHN & SUZANNE BOHN, 1440 BALDUR PARK ROAD, VARIANCES AND CPU. The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and approve variances for lot area, lot width, hardcover, and setback variances, and a Conditional Use Permit to construct a new dwelling. The proposal moves the structure back further from the lake and reduces the hardcover. The proposed home would be smaller than the square footage allowed but larger than the existing house. The neighbors are in support. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicant, Joe Franson of Boyer Building Corp., Minnetonka. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:05 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:05 p.m. Commissioners pointed out the proposed house would be larger in square footage than the existing house, but not exceed what could be allowed, and would improve other conditions, such as lake setback and hardcover. It was noted that the house could be made smaller and not need variances, and still be larger than the existing house. Ressler moved, Brandabur seconded, to approve LA25-000024, 1440 Baldur Park Road, Variances and CPU as applied. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 1 (Weltzin). Page 1 of 5 3 Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Monday, August 18, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 5.2 LA25-000031, WARREN GARRETT, 650 BROWN ROAD NORTH, VARIANCE The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and approve a variance to construct a second -story addition within the dimensions of the existing house. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicant, Warren Garrett, 650 Brown Road North. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:26 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:26 p.m. Commissioners were in favor of the variance as the average lakeshore setback is for sightlines, and a modest second story does not affect any other home's view. Weltzin moved, Prchal seconded, to approve LA25-000031, 650 Brown Road N, Variance as applied. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. 5.3 LA25-000032, BRAD JANS O/B/O GOOD SHEPARD CHURCH, 3745 SHORELINE DR, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and approve a conditional use permit to add two additional accessory buildings. One building had been approved a few years ago, but never built. The two buildings proposed now would roughly total the area of the garage that was not built. The applicant has been in touch with the Watershed District. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicant, Brad Jans, 3745 Shoreline Dr., who said one shed would be for church storage and the other would be for day care storage. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:35 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:35 p.m. Commissioners supported the plan, saying an application was previously approved and expired, and is now proposed in a new way. Ressler moved, Weltzin seconded, to approve LA25-000032, 3745 Shoreline Dr, Conditional Use Permit as applied. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. 5.4 LA25-000035, MILLER DUNWIDDIE, 880 PARTENWOOD RD, VARIANCE Page 2 of 5 4 Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Monday, August 18, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and approve a variance for an average lakeshore setback for an addition to an existing building. The addition would encroach a small amount into the average lakeshore setback but would stay within the 75-foot setback. The adjacent property owner and the neighborhood architectural committee support the request. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicant, Jerry Gray,880 Partenwood Rd. He explained they would like to add a main floor bedroom to continue to live there and have tried hard to keep the requested exceptions minimal. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:45 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:45 p.m. Commissioners pointed out that the house is on a peninsula and the proposed addition won't impact a neighbor. Moving the utilities will be an improvement, and the neighbors have sent a letter of support. It seemed to be a reasonable way to help the homeowners stay in their homes. Teft moved, Ressler seconded, to approve LA25-000035, 880 Partenwood Rd, Variance as applied. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. 5.5 LA25-000036, Brian Roath, 1200 Wildhurst Trail, After -the -Fact Variances and Conditional Use Permit The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and consider the request for an after -the -fact setback variance for a patio and a Conditional Use Permit for a retaining wall. Staff recommends denial of the setback variance and approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the retaining walls with conditions for screening and wall modification to meet the setbacks. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicant, Brian Roath, 1200 Wildhurst Trail, who explained they made improvements in 2021 but did not realize permits were needed. The patio improves their enjoyment of the lake property. When the home was built in the 1970s, the building plan was altered in such a way that the patio, deck, and stairs went into the side yard setback. They are willing to move the deck steps and remove the parts of the patio that encroach, but would like to retain a small amount to make a good transition. He had letters from engineers, arborists, and landscapers. He said the retaining wall was planned as a shared wall between neighbors. RECESS & RECONVENE Chair Bollis recessed the meeting at 7:29 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 7:34 p.m. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 7:34 p.m. Sandy Rasmussen, 1186 Wildhurst Trail, the neighboring property since 1991, gave a history of improvements to the lot, including changes to property lines. She said the original owners added an asphalt walkway, fire pit, seeding, screen porch, and deck. The next owners added riprap to the shoreline, Page 3 of 5 Y Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Monday, August 18, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 and the current owners, the Roaths, who purchased in 2015, added a 10 X 12 shed and the patio extension, and the retaining wall. The homes are close, and water from the neighbor's roof through a gutter system causes erosion on their property. The Rasmussens have paid for a survey to be done. Set- back intrusions have been compounded by the retaining wall as well as erosion. The Rasmussens are concerned about the height of the wall and the danger of falls. They have been told the trees in the retaining wall will die in the next five years, and are concerned they are in danger of coming down in a storm because the root systems are gone. They are asking for the setback to be returned and making the retaining wall safe. Brian Rasmussen, 1186 Wildhurst Trail, said there was no erosion before the neighboring lot was cleared. Jay Nygard, 1386 Rest Point Rd, asked about the engineering study and the height of the previous retaining wall. He said Roath, as park commission chair, should have known better than to commit such an egregious violation to his yard and the neighbor's yard. He advocated for returning the slope to the way it was. Brian Turbeville, 997 Wildhurst Trail, said he believes there was confusion, and this situation started innocently. It may not have been intentional, but it is not OK to let it be remediated in a non -conforming way. The retaining wall was not needed for the trees. Barbara Schmidt, 50 Landmark Drive, said it's unbelievable that the Park Commission chair for over five years doesn't know to get a permit, and that people should not be allowed to do these things and get an after -the -fact permit. If that is allowed, it will be repeated all over the lake. She said the lot needs to be restored. Dave Velander, 5655 Alexander Drive, said the situation is ridiculous and the City needs to play by the rules. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 8:08 p.m. Planning Commissioners had more questions for the applicant, who contended that a portion of the encroaching patio and the stair landing, and the stairs were already present when they bought the house in 2015. Commissioners suggested it was necessary to look at the application as two parts — the patio and the retaining wall. Building so close to the property line will inevitably cause issues with run-off and trespassing. Existing conditions are that approvals were given to allow the house partially in the setback, and if all parties are willing to work together, perhaps a solution can be found, and this would be a good time to fix erosion and run-off issues, they said. They were concerned about the larger patio and would support just enough to have a safe landing area and to get over to the rest of the former patio. Commissioners supported tabling the application so the applicant can work with staff on the patio issue. Regarding the retaining wall, they questioned, with input from professionals, if it could be changed to not encroach on the neighbor's property or the setback, and not exceed height limits. They were not in favor of the proposed remedy for the wall. Ressler moved, Prchal seconded, to table LA25-000036,1200 Wildhurst Trail, After -the -Fact Variances and Conditional Use Permit for more information based on the discussion. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Page 4 of 5 6 Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Monday, August 18, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 6. OTHER ITEMS Community Development Director Oakden updated the Planning Commission on City Council actions on applications on which they had made recommendations. 7. ADJOURNMENT Tift moved, Weltzin seconded, to adjourn the Planning Commission Meeting at 9:10 to September 15, 2025. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. ATTEST: Christopher Bollis, Chair Page 5 of 5 7 AGENDA ITEM Date: September 15, 2025 Item: 5.1 Title: LA25-000038, Grizzly Construction o/b/o James Morrison, 1384 Baldur Park Road, Variances, Public Hearing Presenter: Melanie Curtis, Planner Section: Public Hearings 1. Purpose: This application contemplates variances to redevelop a nonconforming lot. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline: This application was received on August 20 and considered to be complete on September 3, 2025. Therefore the 60-day review period will end on November 2, 2025. 3. Background: The property is located on the Baldur Park peninsula. The applicant has requested the following land use approvals to construct a new home: 1. Lot area variance; 2. Lot width variance; 3. 75-foot lake setback variance; 4. Hardcover variance to exceed 25% overall; and 5. Hardcover variance within 75 feet of the OHWL Refer to the Planning Report attached as Exhibit A for a full project description and variance analysis. 4. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval as applied. 5. Planning Commission Action Requested: Planning Commission should make a motion to approve the application with the following conditions: 1. Revise the hardcover calculation worksheets. 2. Provide an updated survey to show the southern 75-foot setback line and proposed grading. Exhibits Exhibit A - Planning Report Exhibit B - Application Exhibit C - Practical Difficulty Exhibit D - Existing and Proposed Surveys Exhibit E - Construction Plans Exhibit F - Existing and Proposed HC Exhibit G - Photos Exhibit H - Map and List 8 Date Application Received: 08/20/2025 Date Application Considered as Complete: 09/03/2025 60-Day Review Period Expires: 11/02/2025 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner MCC Date: 15 September 2025 Subject: #LA25-000038, Grizzly Construction o/b/o James Morrison, 1384 Baldur Park Road Variances Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting the following approvals to redevelop the property with a new home: 1. Lot area variance; 2. Lot width variance; 3. 75-foot lake setback variance; 4. Hardcover variance to exceed 25% overall; and 5. Hardcover variance within 75 feet of the OHWL. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The subject property is located on the Baldur Park peninsula. Although the property only abuts the lake on the north side, 75-foot lake setback restrictions impact both sides of the property. The applicant has requested several land use approvals to construct a new home. The new home is proposed to improve the setback from the northern lakeshore and will slightly increase the hardcover level. The proposal improves the lake setback on the south by 13 feet by removing an existing 737 square foot detached garage (42 feet from the OHWL) and adding the new attached garage (55 feet from the OHWL). Within the combined northern and southern 75-foot lake setback areas, a 1,247 square foot hardcover reduction is proposed. The proposed plan increases the overall hardcover by 0.1% (from 3,909 square feet to 3,910 square feet). The driveway is located within the southern 75-foot OHWL setback. The existing driveway approach (curb cut) is nonconforming at approximately 50 feet wide, where 20 feet is permitted. The proposed 12-foot-wide driveway improves the nonconformity and provides a conforming 5-foot setback from the side lot line. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has not clearly identified practical difficulties supporting the requested variances. They have responded to the practical difficulty criteria and a short narrative attached as Exhibit C, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds that there are practical difficulties in the substandard lot size supporting the redevelopment of the property. The applicant has not identified practical difficulties that support the requested variances. However, the requested variances appear to be reasonable and are supported by practical difficulties. °tea �leV, Oprk dopy O 9 FILE # LA25-000038 15 September 2025 Page 2 of 5 LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Measurements noted below in bold italics require variances. Section 6.12.1550 — Lot Area/Width: LR-1C Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100, Actual 11,992 s.f. (0.27 acre) #51' @ 75' / #55' @ OHWL Section 6.12.1550 & 6.12.6240 — Setbacks: LR-1C Required Existing Proposed 17' Home Northwest Side 7.5' * 19' Detached Garage 14.5' 10' Home Southeast Side 7.5' * 7.5' Detached Garage 7.6 Rear/Street 30' 21' Detached Garage 34' 67' Home 78' Home North Lakeshore 75' 60' Deck 75.5' Deck stair South Lakeshore 75' 42' Detached Garage 55'Home The proposed home conforms to the ALS on the northern lakeshore, Average Lakeshore where the primary lake views are located. The property does not connect to the lake on the south side; therefore, the ALS does not apply on the south side. *Exception: City Code Section 6.12.1550 (b)(1) Section 6.12.6930 — Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 11,992 s.f. (0.27 acre) Allowed: 2,398 s.f. (20%) Existing: 1,793 s.f. (15%) Proposed: 2,409 s.f. (20%) Section 6.12.9110 and 6.12.9210 — Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area Allowed Overlay District Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover in Zone Hardcover Tier 2,998 s.f. 909 3, 2,692 s.f. w/in 3,910 s.f. 1,445 s.f. w/in Tier 1 11,992 s.f. s.f. (25 %) 75' setback (32.6%) 75'setback (32 5%) 10 FILE # LA25-000038 15 September 2025 Page 3 of 5 Applicable Regulations: Lot Area and Lot Width Variances (Chapter 6.12 Section 1550) Zoning Code Section 6.12.320 provides options for the redevelopment of lots that do not meet the minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district. Substandard properties within the Shoreland Overlay District may be redeveloped without variances from lot size and width requirements if the following standards are met: 1. All setback requirements can be met. A setback variance is requested; this criterion cannot be met. 2. The lot is connected to a public sewer, and 3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of this chapter, and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed 25 percent of the entire lot area. Hardcover variances are requested; this criterion cannot be met. 4. All other zoning district standards can be met. The applicant's request for hardcover and setback variances results in the property's inability to conform to all of the standards above. Therefore, lot area and lot width variances are also required to redevelop the property. The ability to develop the property in a manner consistent with other developed properties in the neighborhood would be limited if the lot width and lot area variances are not granted. 75-foot Lake Setback Variances (Chapter 6.12 Section 6240) The applicant's plan reflects building and driveway encroachments in the 75-foot lake setback area. Hardcover Variances (Chapter 6.12 Sections 9110 & 9210) With redevelopment, the applicant proposes to increase the total site hardcover amount by 0.1% (from 32.5% to 32.6%). A hardcover reduction of 1,247 square feet is proposed within the 75-foot setback areas. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 6.12.530) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit, as a variance, any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit, as a variance, the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed lot area and width variances are in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The substandard lot has difficulties in its small size and narrow width, and is encumbered by lakeshore setbacks on two sides, making development difficult. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances proposed to rebuild a new home on this nonconforming lot are consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to allow construction of anew residence on the substandard lot is reasonable. The proposed hardcover will increase by 0.1% over the existing condition; however, the proposal includes a significant reduction within the lake yard areas. 11 FILE # LA25-000038 15 September 2025 Page 4 of 5 b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The substandard lot size is an existing condition, and there is no available land with which to make the property more conforming. The restricted roadway, lot size and shape, and configuration with the lake on two sides are challenges not created by the owners. There should be consideration for variances for the substandard -sized property. The project has been designed with an effort toward limiting the additional hardcover without sacrificing functionality; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances are requested to permit the construction of a new home on the residential property, which is reasonable. Additionally, City Code Section 6.12.530 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 6.12. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 6.12 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a single-family residence is an allowed use in the LR-1C District. 7. The board or council may permit, as a variance, the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The property's substandard size, location, and unique configuration with lakeshore on two sides create significant difficulties that also apply to many of the properties in the same neighborhood. The proposed setbacks and hardcover level are not out of character. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. Other properties in the neighborhood are similarly impacted by the peninsula configuration and small lot sizes. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The proposed size of the home conforms to 20% structural coverage limitations. Granting of the lot area and width, setback, and hardcover variances are necessary for the preservation of the property rights of the owners. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the variances for lot size, hardcover, and setbacks in this situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Without variances, the property is unbuildable. The variances for lot size, setback, and hardcover are necessary and do not merely serve as a convenience to the owners. The Commission may recommend, or the Council may impose conditions in granting variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments No comments from the public have been received as of the drafting of this report. Analysis The applicant's plan appears to be consistent with the immediate neighborhood, and although it reflects a minimal (0.1%) increase in hardcover overall, it provides a significant hardcover reduction within 75 feet of the lake. Issues for `V, FILE # LA25-000038 15 September 2025 Page 5 of 5 Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner that is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval as applied. Before consideration by the City Council, the applicant should revise the hardcover calculation worksheets to correctly identify the proposed hardcover within both 75-foot setback areas and provide an updated survey to reflect the southern 75-foot setback line and the proposed grading plan. Planning Commission Action Requested Planning Commission should make a motion to approve the application with the following conditions: 1. Revise the hardcover calculation worksheets. 2. Provide an updated survey to show the southern 75-foot setback line and proposed grading. 13 Land Use Application Summary Application Date: Address: Parcel Number: Land Use Number: Application Submitted By: Owner: 08/20/2025 1384 Baldur Park RD Orono, MN 55391 0811723310004 LA25-000038 Agent on behalf of property owner Name: JAMES MORRISSEY Address: - Jimmy Morrissey Applicant: Name: Michael Gardner Company: Grizzly Construction Address: 718 N Washington Ave Minneapolis, MN 55401 michael@grizzlyconstructionnm.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Sam DeLeo Associated Contact: Tom Osfar Tomosfar@gmail.com Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: New Home Construction Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application ❑ Appeal of Admin Decision ❑ Concept Application ❑ Conditional Use Permit 0 Site Plan Application ❑ Subdivision Application O Subdivision Exception ❑ Vacation Application ❑ Variance Application 0 r Applicant Signature: � 14 PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA25-000038 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response:N/A 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response:N/A 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The variance requested is minor and intended to keep the home in line with neighboring properties in the community. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response:N/A S. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1161.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response:N/A 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response:N/A 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response:N/A 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response:N/A 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response:N/A 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response:N/A 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: The proposed variance will not create or exacerbate any of the aforementioned issues. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response:N/A 15 Proposed removal of existing structures and construction of a new home on 1384 Boulder Park Road. This house is currently 10 feet behind the lake side sight line of the adjacent houses but 10' into the lake 75' OWH. The existing Detached garage is encroaching into the front 30-foot set back from Baldur Park Rd. significantly in front of the adjacent homes. The house to the west is almost entirely within the 75' OWH of the lake. Per recommendations from the initial planning meeting, we have proposed moving the House toward Baldur Park Road and to position within the front, rear and side setbacks. The new plan changes the site from a nonconforming separate house with a detached Garage to a Compliant and esthetically appealing improvement to the site. 16 ti ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM NAD 83 (1996 ADJ.) 0 10 20 SCALE IN FEET Ordinary High Water (OHW) Contour Elev. = 929.88 per Mn/DNR (NAVD 88) Shoreline as curve ed on 7/01 /2025 y Elev. = 930.4 (NAVD 88) 100-Year Base Flood Elev. (BFE) Contour • ' Q` - ' , , - ' Elev.= 931.1 per FEMA (NAVD 88) i 0, 5� a t+• , - �' ————————— —————-- v---------- - - - -- - Pavers R�Ey�N 1 b' --------- - ----- 53 �� - _ 515 b --- / Slopes are 40% to. 50% in this area Wood' " \ -Steps ' Ln r_ I CP °''' 6 Block \ ` \ ' Retaining \ \ \ \ \ ° \ •..v. Wall , ' BW1din .'�.o—._�' Site — e L inLm\ _ as \ I — — Nc X 944.5 _IL u. \ 947.81� \ Wood Steps ,I ID I Chimney / I \ 1 .q:p.. ► \ \ 1 t( 1 0 I \ o \ I :o• \ \ 9 4,6 , \ ' House 946 938.2 I � o'° LO AC ° I\ °o 34" MAPLE \ w Upper Level -++ FFE = 946.45 t I p A5 I i Lower Level 9 N v\ • I o . , FFE = 938.86 t g I+ / o 0'1, MAPLE Z I / \ Lake Minnetonka Lake Data \ \ OHWL: 929.4 (NGVD 29) \ 929.88 (NAVD 88) \ Highest Recorded= Not Known \ Lowest Recorded= 922.26 NAVD 88 (12-16-1937) \ (DNR BM uses 0.48 to convert to NAVD 88) \ \ FEMA 100-Year BFE = 931.1 (NAVD 88) \ \ I 'J4b.4 X T N n I e °y4 Deck - - - \ \ �P \� 0 Q I,, T` I0�j \ �N o l 1 - D• --- eO ` ti 936.4 rn 1 MI \ � \ -_ �o \ ' --- p \ �P \\\ _937- I a 30" OAK P � - _ , I 0)\ 94 Elev.Benchmark: 937.36 (NAVD 88) CL / ,° \ k Q� 0 O ti 9 I w------ °' a foot o — \9� 9 D r \ I FFE 934.7 'I \ \ \0 \ I Garage 46" MAPLE I ` ° o \ %2 \ ASH 30 f—re I I : ° tr . , ° t S ee Se tback, HPI \ I U .c. '•• •. #: •o. (D ,•. Q yG �\ "J• \ n o 0 16 OB O'X E L�D \E 93 2 , •6' ' - - - - - - : :ACC •' ��•• ` Sanita� • N 3 ° \ rY Sewer :oHP . 0 1 1 \ . . 53 ; QIYP \ \932,2_ - \ 00d- \ \ ( der park _ SURVEYORS NOTES - _ ' - _ _ _ � � BHP • I ' • -'cam V ONP f' i The property address for the subject property is: 1384 Baldur Park Road, Orono, MN. The property owner of the subject property is: James Morrissey. - _3 — 932- - - - - _- - - _ -------------- The county tax parcel identification number (PID) for the subject property is: 0811723310004. A-1, - --'- ��} Shoreline as surveyed on 7/01 /2025 The current zoning classification for the subject property is: LR-1C. ��'L`Elev. = 930.4 (NAVD 88) The property is within a Tier 1 Storm Quality District. Ordinary High Water (OHW) Contour Elev. = 929.88 Der Mn/DNR (NAVD 88) This survey was completed without the benefit of a current title commitment or title opinion. Kramer Leas DeLeo, P.C. makes no guarantee that all easements, encumbrances, or appurtenant rights related to the premises property are depicted on this survey. 100-Year Base Flood Elev. (BFE) Contour Elev. = 931.1 per FEMA (NAVD 88) There were no bluffs observed as part of this survey. UTILITES Legal Description per Document No. 11374408 All structure setbacks should be verified with the City of Orono prior to any construction. Property area above OHW Level is: 11,992 Sq. Ft. (0.27 Acres). The topographic data shown hereon represents that from filed work completed on 7/24/2025. NO. REVISIONS SINCE INITIAL DATE OF 8/20/2025 DATE —i 1 REVISED SETBACK LINE ALONG BALDER DRIVE 8/29/2025 The utilities shown hereon represent those identified during the field surveys operations and the record drawings provided by the utility owner for this project, if any. Utilities were physically marked via Gopher State One Call Ticket Number 251951554. Kramer Leas DeLeo, P.C. makes no warranties as to the locations, depths, or types of any utilities within the area shown hereon. User(s) of this map, survey, or plan are responsible for locating all utilities prior to any excavation, tunneling, drilling, or driving of objects into the ground. 1120Industrial Park Road I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SURVEY, OR REPORT Brainerd, MN56401 WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION 218-829-5333 AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR 13North 11thAvenue UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. St Cloud, MN 56303 320-259-1266 KRAMER LEAS DELEO SURVEYING • ENGINEERING • PLANNING B R A I N E R D ST. CLOUD Signature: � m 4" /y- ��GD Samuel J. DeLeo, MN License No. 40341 PROJECT NO. GRIZC2502 8/29/2025 Date Lot 19, Block 1, Baldur Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Existing Conditions Survey PID No 0811723310004 Owner: James Morrissey, 1384 Baldur Park Road City of Orono, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota Located in Section 8, Township 117 North, Range 23 West O V_ 6 Z a..r w N \ 00 T ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM NAD 83 (1996 ADJ.) 0 10 20 SCALE IN FEET / Xil V' V ' Ordinary High Water (OHW) Contour N Elev. = 929.88 per Mn/DNR (NAND 88) CShoreline as curve ed on 7/01 /2025 ' r Elev.= 930.4 (NAVD 88) 100-Year Base Flood Elev. (BFE) Contour Elev. = 931.1 per FEMA (NAVD 88) / OOI y1 o, 00 WO-16� ,co �-,----- 6 Pavers vEV L%1 53 b'' ,' - - - - - - - - - \ 51 515 6 --- ------ \ b' ---------- 61a q14 g � , Slopes are 46% to 50% in this area Do not disturb during construction - Wood - -Steps ' ry(b 6 // A ♦ i i V y' \ \ L \ BUildi ` \ '— — ng Site Li NSetiaa k / 947.8 ,� o. I \ \ r1 %D G \ 17•7�P — �3 0 34" MAPLE 946, 946' N O 938.2 I X. Or'r LA Remove Tree -� - -+ fD / 11 11 7 r,' � I 10 10 � r cTl 0 p 'G" 111 O d O ,,,, I 'J4b. 4 X N Setba� -'� `-° ° L c. r" 'O T OVv \ \ r' 7D O C PIP 00 O' IXjoo I s;• ° p v+ N )'w (D -4,O N .ow \ � P 90 OD p O O {/� 9 ,J 40'1 MAPLE P m o N r- -4LA\` ' �� \ �, o oww Proposed House X 936.4 O 90 _ m r+ �� FFE = 946.5 j rn cD \ P \ I 0 l7 1 1 \ � �• � 1 vv O — _ J � Foyer -----14.5 --- FFE = 946.5 A M efer to architectural plans 0 for building dimensions 30" K \ Lake Minnetonka Lake Data \ OHWL: 929.4 (NGVD 29) \ 929.88 (NAVD 88) \ Highest Recorded= Not Known \ Lowest Recorded= 922.26 NAVD 88 (12-16-1937) \ (DNR BM uses 0.48 to convert to NAVD 88) \ \ FEMA 100-Year BFE = 931.1 (NAVD 88) It It It \ `Remove Tree -' a cm a acm 46" MAPLE 0 o 0 J posed Garage FFE = 934.2 1 �1 30 foot Street Setback 1 fD 1 1 � 1 1 Al 1 I - - a ICD / 16" ELM ONP rn °O 16 BOXELDER 933 932- _-- "p 932"6 \\ 184 CF Rain Garden -cam •� 1 \\ i i SanitarySewer :otiP.'N30�11' �_ Ln \ 932.2 ,. v gOlder ;park Roo da : " :. ' :� yp : F • :. ` ,_ _ . SURVEYORS NOTES The property address for the subject property is: 1384 Baldur Park Road, Orono, MN. The property owner of the subject property is: James Morrissey. - - - - - - - _ _ - _ The county tax parcel identification number (PID) for the subject property is: 0811723310004. Ax- ��} L � Shoreline as surveyed on 7/01 /2025 The current zoning classification for the subject property is: LR-1C. MIO;511'L`5�4`,• `2 Elev. = 930.4 (NAVD 88) The property is within a Tier 1 Storm Quality District. Ordinary High Water (OHW) Contour Elev. = 929.88 Der Mn/DNR (NAVD 88) This survey was completed without the benefit of a current title commitment or title opinion. Kramer Leas DeLeo, P.C. makes no guarantee that all easements, encumbrances, or appurtenant rights related to the premises property are depicted on this survey. 100-Year Base Flood Elev. (BFE, Elev. = 931.1 per FEMA (NAVD 88) CLASS IV RIPRAP; SET STONES ACCORDING TO SIZE, SHAPE & ORIENTATION FOR BEST FIT TO 6- TOPSOIL MINIMIZE WOBBLE & GAPSNOIDS (SHIM AS NECESSARY) & TO KEEP A RANDOM APPEARANCE 6" TOPSOIL E LARGEST BOULDERS BURIED A MINIMUM OF BOULDER HEIGHT & OR SHALL ENSURE "BESIZED TO FIT TIGHTLY BETWEEN NES. USE OF COBBLES SHALL BE MINIMIZED BUT ARE PERMITTED TO "SHIM" WALLS & TO FILL VOIDS. VOIDS SHALL NOT BE LARGE ENOUGH TO PERMIT A 3 INCH SPHERE FROM ENTERING. COBBLES SHALL BE SET IN A MANNER THAT PREVENT REMOVAL. SLOPED BOULDER DETAIL NO SCALE EROSION CONTROL NOTES: Construct a rock entrance at point of access to Baldur Park Road. Surround lot with silt fence and additional row of silt fence or bio-roll along top of all slopes flowing toward the lake. TREE PROTECTION: Surround all trees with 4' tall snow fence and steel posts that are to remain on the site, or that are close to the property lines of the site. Tree protection shall be installed as close to the dripline - — of the trees as is practical. There were no bluffs observed as part of this survey. UTILITIES Legal Description per Document No. 11374408 All structure setbacks should be verified with the City of Orono prior to any construction. Property area above OHW Level is: 11,992 Sq. Ft. (0.27 Acres). The topographic data shown hereon represents that from filed work completed on 7/24/2025. NO. REVISIONS SINCE INITIAL DATE OF 8/20/2025 DATE 1 Relocated House 8/29/2025 2 Relocated Pool Et Basin 9/02/2025 3 Misc. revisions related to review comments (Boulder rows, grades, notes, etc. 9/04/2025 4 Removed pool i3 boulder walls, shrunk hours footprint, plus misc. rev per city 9/11 /2025 The utilities shown hereon represent those identified during the field surveys operations and the record drawings provided by the utility owner for this project, if any. Utilities were physically marked via Gopher State One Call Ticket Number 251951554. Kramer Leas DeLeo, P.C. makes no warranties as to the locations, depths, or types of any utilities within the area shown hereon. User(s) of this map, survey, or plan are responsible for locating all utilities prior to any excavation, tunneling, drilling, or driving of objects into the ground. 1120 Industrial Park Road I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SURVEY, OR REPORT Brainerd, MN5640> WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION 218-829-5333 AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR 13North 11thAvenue UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. St Cloud, MN 56303 320-259-1266 K R A M E R LEAS DELEO SURVEYING • ENGINEERING • PLANNING B R A I N E R D ST. CLOUD Signature: --�5o m e" Samuel J. DeLeo, MN License No. 40341 PROJECT NO. GRIZC2502 9/11/2025 Date Lot 19, Block 1, Baldur Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Proposed Improvements Survey / Site Plan PID No 0811723310004 Owner: James Morrissey, 1384 Baldur Park Road City of Orono, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota Located in Section 8, Township 117 North, Range 23 West w� z O w w 0 �m w z� O} �w w w Q w m Z N o N '9 w S 102'-4 1 /2" Elevation � W � 3'-1 1 /2" 5'-10 1 /2" 3'-10" 8'-4 1 /2" 15'-1 1 1 /2" 5'-4 1 /2" 11'-5 1 /2" T-4 1 /2" 36, O _ w }O LL 11 '-5 1 /2" T-4 1 /2" U) Of Q U oN Q o 0 LL W r W QZ�00000= Q O C7 ---- p�zzQ 1 11 • CV �~—w5Qa O Q w p -� I W e �_ cn 0HOQuj m I I I I m s s I 1 w�w0 oc� ------------------------------------ o wwzQ < —--------- ------------------ S I �— I ° Q m o LL of vation 11 Q Z Q S \ Of U- w r I I Iffi �� <QU)co�M� FFI I �DzwWz� \ \ N H — U i �i m CA � � cV w0c�Z-CO � Lin o co m =�wO�wp m m (� U �a-0C) 0� /�/ Lot 11,gg2. sq' i 3 Q) W I_ r I I I I I I ora L"�� o Lower level 1036.95 sq o ry - o �' O Breezeway 535.18 sq' I I ►L- m ~ Elevation 18 �� I I I 1 6 ry r Garage 820.14 sq n' ry ry I I I I I I I I TOT 5 23g2.21 s'/ 11 992 -"^^" n "' I I W ry W W o m ry l I m ��,,o I I I I I q q I I �; m a--' d 4'��a , w I I I I I (� "' I I W ° 1 1 I I I 1 1.L IL---------------------------------------� �I � I 4 —Ai --- : ----------------------- 7 C---I r ry 1 I I---------------J ----- 3' 8 1 /2" �, b 14' 1 b, ` \ \ 1'-111/2" \ N 3'-2 1 /2" 5'-q 1 /21, 3' 10" 10'-5" 3'-4 1 /2" 5'-8" \,\ :T 24'-b" • 10" � 71-611 SIG 102' 4 1 /2" w ----------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- - w W Elevation 8 d M 112----------- 1b' a ion 9-------------- - - 4,- ----- Z 117 1 -2112\ 25 - O 1 -j \ Elev tion 13 23'-3" w �levatilon �2 DATE: 9/11/2025 SCALE: SHEET: A-0 19 34.5' Mean Roof Ht rr JrI - Zr lu r Ivul 21.9' "v Header 20.5' N I finish - 2nd Floor 13.9' Floor - 2nd Floor \ 13.9' `finish - 1st Floor 12.3' a, Header N 10.5' r Floor Finish - 1st Floor 2.3' Top of 5ubfloor - 1 st Floor 2.3' fl Geiling Finish - Foundation 0.5' N v m Grade Level io 0.0' Header N N 4 l6 3 >_ o �p J Floor Finish - Foundation N o l.5' Q Topof Slab �v m (VI of Garage Slab -10.0' III I II II II I III � III I II II III III i III 111 11 h I III ,/ v. III I h I I I i I III ./ `, Elevation 11 / r7 .r_rrr—�r•r ._rr 11 ._r i i r i i r i \ w� Z O UL w Q �m m <Q w Z0) O> �w >� w w 0 w m Z Y � W � O = O co ~ IY o QOoOLaLw1-- LuQZ�0m= Q O O ��U)�� a_O O Q O = Z z } a-LL E LLJ O O LU O 0 L Q w W Lu 0 CD W (n �LLJ Z 0 Q a- W_ Z_ O W CO Q cn m 00 a-LL Z — = (]� z 0 0 0 2 0 0 �jZ W UwELL 11 DUzMZ CO —< J W 0OU~CCU _ �Z — Q w O w O I-a_0UOj1- W a UIZ5 y N Q 0 DATE: 8/20/2025 SCALE: 1/4 11=11 SHEET: 6_1 1 20 w� O w w Q �m m �Q w z� O} �w w w Ca W m Z Hi hest Rid e 34.6' O = O Uj � ~ } r a� o ��c � U O m m C Oz O LL � w = _ OOzz�}� d w O= OU �LU 0o�L<w O CD wwa LLjZw Q 0- w z 0 Header �02Q�mQQ U d w z — = � 20.5' ��c)— O Q z O O w 0 w 1�� - � � Z) cf) 0 0 z M Z—< N N _ - O U~— U z cn — Q cp � O =�wO wO - 0 o U o Floor Finish - 2nd Floor - F 13.9' , J, E:, Li 1 1// To of 5ubfloor - 2nd Floor 6 m CeilingFinish - 1st Floor 6� 12.3' o 10 Header 10.3' O 0 v 000 Floor Finish - 1st Floor 2.3' - I n To of 5ubfloor - 1st Floor - - O v' LI j Lid 2.3' 2'° 0 Geilin Finish - Foundation - - 0.5' v v L Grade Level SNSA C v mm Header r- r lV <V Floor Finish - Foundation -"1.5' To of 51ab Cam! To of 5ubfloor - Foundation m w U� z Elevation 11 1 \V DATE: 8/20/2025 SCALE: 1/4 "=1 ' SHEET: 6-2 1 21 i II II IIIN Elevation 12 oL ❑ O ❑CI o❑❑ IE U �C 1: ` UCH �C�_❑�C �❑o l �❑o �'=1 i �C ❑O o O 0❑❑ � �� { O _ ❑ ❑ C <cCCI off❑❑ J ❑�O^o'er ��C❑❑O❑oC❑�O^o�� Elevation 14 ■imi�I 1�"i ■_. ■I 1■I 1■I I■1 101 I I 1■I I■I 1■1 1■ I■I I■� I■I I■I I■� 101 Is 101 IN 1■I 1■ 1■I I■I I■ I■I I■I !■I !■� I■I I■� I■I I■ I■� I■I I■� I■� I■I I■� I■I I■1 1■I 10I I■ I■I I■� I■I I■ I■� ---� �--- �--- �--- �---� �---� �---� �---� ■I I■I I■I I■I I■� I■I I■I I■I 1■1 1■1 10I I■I I■� I■I I■I I■� I■� I■I I■I I■� I■� I■I I■I I■� I■I I■1 I■1 I■I I■� I■I I■I I■I ■I I■I I■I I■I I■� I■I I■I I■I I■I I■I I■I I■� I■� I■I I■I I■I 1■I I■I I■I I■I I■� I■I I■I I■I I■� I■I I■I I■� I■I I■I I■I I■� .III III I■I I■I I■I I■I I■I I■ I■� I■I I■I I■� I■I I■� I■� I■I I■� I■I 1■I 1■I 1■I I■I I■� I■I I■� I■� I■� I■� I■I I■� IN1■1 ISI■I .� I■� I■� ICI I� .� I�■� ICI I� .1 I01 I■�� I� ICI I■� I■� ICI 1 III �'� �� ■i ��i ��i ■i i■i !■I o I■I I■I I■I I■I I■I I■I I■I I■I I■I I■I I■I I■IWE I■I I■I I■I I■I �■■_■■_m I■I I■I I■I I■I I■1 I■I I■Ti m-[I ®I 11111�1�■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■I � I■I I■I I■I I■I I■I I■I I■I I■I 1■I 10I 1■I 1■I 1■I 1■I 1■I W-- 1■I I■I I■I I■I I■I I■I I■I I■I �s�MENNEN w� z O fr w w Q Mm m �Q w zks) O> q)w >� w w 0 w m z LU L .O L QU 46-4 X LU DATE: 8/20/2025 SCALE: SHEET: E-1 22 est F 34.8' 34.6' ilincl Finish - 2nd Floor ° Header 20.7' door Finish - 2nd Floor :)f Sbfloor - 2nd Floor 13.9' tiling Finish - 1st Floor I 12.3' Floor Finish - 1 st Floor 2.3' Top of SubAoor - list Floor 2.3' If IIJLI - Lf RA T IVVI t, 21.41' Header 20. b' d CV N floor - 2nd Floor 13.9' `inish - 1st Floor 12.3' Header Jill m N m CA 10.3' LIP, in °finish - 1st Floor 2.3' floor - 15t Floor 2.3' ish - Foundation Ah Grade Level 0.0' "v m co 1z Y v m I IVVI 1 1111011 -1 VUf IUQ LIVII o of Slab Top J� -7.6' Top of SubFloor - Foundation I cv _ m m CV CV Top of Garage 51ab .10.0'1 30' Max Ht allowed m � Mean Building Roof Ht Ln + 'o Az 2 U � Q CD Fu 3 v o � � v o� o �? m Ceilina Finish - Foundation 0.5' v m Grade Level 0.0' u' Header v m Floor Finish - Foundation r- 4.5' 'op of SubAoor - Foundation Top of 51ab -1.61 , ry m Top of Garage Slab /1 W is 1mn.u® — l L° � o_OI O� C O ❑( O� U u � C0 �� U COI �L �U U��L -F_ A 0 � oOl ❑:� O( �0�� OO�oCO O�� Q��oCO COI Elevation 6 m 0 0 77 I� �I 777 LN imu.umn w Z O w w Q � �m m Q � W Z � O} � W W w W m Z v I ua L L ' X ��u m 0 w a U) z_ 0 DATE: 8/20/2025 SCALE: SHEET: E-2 23 ESHO"* City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 1384 Baldur Park Road, Orono, MN Prepared by: Sam DeLeo, Licensed Land Su Date: 9/2/2025 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to the site plan or survey (must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict the existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter that are within the 75- foot setback or split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footaqe separatelv for each portion. Key Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet (Example) (Garage) 24' x 30' 720 S.F. A FEATURES WITHIN THE 75-FOOT SETBACK BUFFER N 06 In S. F. B House All items measured using CAD 158 S.F. C Sidewalk and steps See attached sketch 339 S.F. D Subtotal = 497 S. F. E S.F. F FEATURES BEYOND THE 75-FOOT SETBACK BUFFER S. F. G House 898 S.F. H Sidewalk along side of house 85 S.F. Deck 176 S.F. Whirlpool pad 48 S.F. K Sidewalk between house and garage _9rr1— (I '�j S.F. L -fie' S. F. M 6arageapren 13— S.F. N -ter- -4,a43- S. F. O Retaining walls 39+76+16+32+12+249 424 S.F. P Subtotal = 3,936 S. F. Q S.F. R _ V1. 1 ce 31C1 PST + - S.F. S S.F. T f2Y1VWei L -4- eA- L+1 (D S. F. u PeA a 4 7- 21 — S.F. V a ra ge, S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. 1 Total Existing Hardcover 4,433 S.F. Excludable Hardcover See City Code Sec 78-1684 : Retaining walls 39+76+16+32+12+249 424 S.F. First 100 S.F. of deck on back of House 100 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover 524 S.F. 3 Net Existing Hardcover rSubtract line 2 from line 1 3.909 S.F. 4 Total Lot Area 11,992 S.F. Existing Hardcover Percentage [ (3) : (4) ] •! ,Z�7 0/0jo ter.. 1-6 f 0 r I r,' St.t eY-- I -of -4, L-� 2 Imo Last Updated: January 2024 % Note: This is an information sheet only, every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 7 of 8 24 City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 1384 Baldur Park Road, Orono, MN Prepared by: Sam DeLeo, Licensed Land Surveyor Date: 9/11/2025 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of the proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to the site plan or survey (must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict the proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter that are within the 75-foot setback or split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to SurveyS Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total are Feet (Example) (Garage) 24' x 30' 720 S.F. A FEATURES WITHIN THE 75-FOOT SETBACK BUFFER S.F. B Existing walk and steps by lake 29+45 74 S.F. C Existing stone walls by lake 39+16+8 63 S. F. D S.F. E S.F. F Subtotal = 137 S.F. G S.F. H S.F. FEATURES BEYOND THE 75-FOOT SETBACK BUFFER S.F. J House (including attached garage) 2,. S.F. K Steps on lake side of house 36 S.F. L Deck that is not over steps on lake side of house 16+16 32 S.F. M Sidewalk 124 S.F. N Dhvewa 1235'- S.F. O Sloped boulder walls 38+27+195 260 S.F. P Subtotal= S.F. Q S.F. R Y 'l Ti? . 5� rs%* r . Ube S`t , S.F. S S.F. T tG{ Ei \ - - S.F. U t vc v✓/- S.F. v S.F. VV x S.F. All items measured using CAD S.F. Y See attached sketch S.F. Z 'Area overlaps with steps. S.F. 1 Total Proposed Hardcover 4.233 S.F. Excludable Hardcover See City Code Sec 78-1684 : Retaining walls (within setback buffer) 39+16+8 63 S. F. Retaining walls (beyond setback buffer) 38+27+195 260 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover 323 S.F. 3 Net Proposed Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line 1 3,910 S.F. 4 Total Lot Area 11.992 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [ (3) _ (4) ] 32_6 % 7c� ( S&boC., t-(G Iq qr'j i 01 Last Updated., January 2024 to Note: This is an information sheet only, every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 8 of 8 25 26 70. s IN �41 .4 AT f4 or. Vwl - 11 Vertical < Sun Apr 62 25 27 4 .,fir.. i "? ,' .: '; o•F• { � .%kit' ,�{{ � •l ; r ' r ` 40 ff''/ C •.S� • i(/ •T A- M�• - t,. F i .. j "R P • �- � e 'R it ... e:1' � �. •r~ ; �s.• � ,' 1 �' • ^,• l - s, r ,. rf " - •�, , J� : pry,, �° 4 ::�: ,�'�i... fir:}•"�'" �! .�� s - . t,f�.��, � � ��., �-.. :' dad..: ■ c .•3P. AAl t WA wYL+ : 0 AvdM f L Oblique < Sun Apr 6 2025 K 1 28 F a 7 J.~a Y . 29 - a I'�ti • � __ '� � , ram' s � � •. 4 � a r All w . L, L"y Ile L oblique C Sun Apr 5 2025 y 30 24 le dP it' �d-7 % -WWWAJ I r 1; �.---7zn4 4. 45P A -r Ar. 01- ar t a 00, AW op 41� AL vc 4 "1 ii -SOL j7 ti �49 Rol •�' R \ F, I OW # +-,� w r t Y1 ' it �J j/� •fir 7 . \ - r ."-" f �, -.. .. `'{. t� �J�� +ty ��r` '�,rp �r.R'r � •FJD •� :: - : � i fir, �� '... ram' .M1-`"f'/, ,7.. µ'me ��r J--+• I •- - t � � _- �. ` � :^� Y�,� �� +�: air r • - Yf - � `r �` —� Y_ •• - _ _ ... .�. ,. •_ � .• jl�•N'��+j'��.-�j� `;'�4��'+'7Vl�t 4j,, y- • - i #,,�. � ---�.! _ '4 � � ��- 11, - r a{ �yJ .-.+rt�_ r��• T �+1�r • - - •y�:v - .- '_ •Y r✓'' - ,'�� M - ti�.'�; .. :�� - - �� O+ �h_ r a�"• � ,. r -- _ �� ;Jy.•'�--•f,J. .1.Yfw -y%-r � ..: i,(iw,•-7 •, ! �� e f �-. �j �" 7 • .. -• - •*.- .`'X �� _ _.'•ti ��` _ �`. rr �: �Rr �sr�� .v�•� - ... ■.+fr �• .i1 y �';. 9.ty4 ` ' �.�- {y.-•�•�� . � � �. r - X '*«•�� .f�r'i<Z► i .. fr v^�^ - i. '��'-1 - ]�i!I� -� -.�':? t.. -t ,J -, •- ., - _ 1�� _ �,7i� � � � � +L,{.r _ -� �f ��7 s,nti W ,. �'r�f.-.��lr r �A � '%�s� 4 "r . r• •. 1 ., t-• � • f•• '� * - � _• -ti r �ti�.� �'-'-.y r� 3 '�.' •' ' x �- = .fir _ � f '" � -S r R� j. a' vr•:.'�r , � S ^ ,,+ . ~i ` ..fir .7 r r.,e 'r T• ,"�='"y ~, t♦ r 'S + F '� . y' �' �E � •i '• `~: com qw 27 �__-�� +� �1 !{fir. .J •� r !,; r .. �ql" - •- �- . f �' �. ��' -.14 ;� !` t.•�T'S a.��i,'RM1"�-rr�rJ'l•� HLi_�r i•i' t•� - _ �R. �.� : � '�' != � � j i �' + Sr.� _ .: - F -� . -'✓�� ;d.. j��.�•r`' {, -. ��. � '� .. .7 , fir•,'»' •��.. .•tiR, - dF: � ••k[ . A ��•.. �- c . 3- i _ *• j'y rSJ 'r ., �- 1,•: '' ar r. { o ; ::+ , .'� i - - �`1� - G • ~ p .: s ry . t • L: y( + >• - � �4"". � J R„ K • r n �' r yam.,~� .'► Y 't' �" � - �t . �- s .�-.:F.• - ram; .. _ ,'.s.�rK _ v� r +•�' s��r�!�-s�: �'.G ors•: � .•' �;_ '.r a •..-! �.►'. .•'•.r'w^ •_ -f•. �' tee: trr�•�Y'.=+ 'iL L��t �'- - 4-�,' .. � }w 4- �-:..�� +t . "�u. - � J'aa .• p- �wr .� ,��• � \ �►,� R ��'1 � � 1' / r, sue' �.«1� y'� ice' � \ R A � �y{ � .i j :. + ~ � � � ! • . �"�� /tom �rC `` •�1Av , ] " ] �' a, .� � �. - -. ��•.� � - f ' �� •�• [ `tom r • -, M-M WIN Ris 6 tell go 1 it ■ ..'•�1Ci \ ��l+T! .. r. r ire •.. •ti �•� ►• ��` yr!-�•.• "t'ti Yi ��, •�' � t1� i .. .* ,tom �y� � "'�'►„ +� ,, � ' � _�• 1 ' ,', ; . ' •' ~"�� s_.� VAN •ter _ J ? f`• _ ti A. Alt 'lk s't` r - r +`� •�� j.• �� !- S- 'may /S �=�. 14 �= v- � TTT •. 1 `' a ti, - -__ • . ...•:� •, yr' - ••i a#� r ., .r .. � l _ � • r-« _ �-�� .. _�'. � }� !S .- i• - r S_ - � may: �f.ny,-r _ -r,.; - _ _ _. .. ..�^ - �� •�� _ _• ,'.�,� _ _ -.. ,y �•�i1�-" __ lets - �, � - L . •I' , y ��1�� - s � r R• .•�:`•�-�„w}='-' + Mom• �w'•3 -' .+r !'ti' �- s. �y� = r • �• "- Y`r - i"`�,r '�•:�+-�r"ri '�' M �'n�„-�,� �j�� . c_ `�[ w,.Y. _ - - - .� •; '-� _•7 • i-.,� '. . r.�R,Y;,��T-'`i-'• _�z;.i � - +i4 - �'` i-�'''''{L•'f'�=. ?�.�. � • � _ � - .-T:3�!�-� .' � c - . F � k ' _ ' r = � .. 1•'' '� - r y ; , �.,' - _ : _ _ `• :, '.. �z _ • •_ �`� 'fir. ,i,• __'�T•'�'- j.. _. '.If 4' ;',y t•`f 1•l�a- 'r� - .ti - - ;..•f: i'' • -rM��'*` .': r•� 'i•. ya`� '; _.�'- •3 `'r, _i' - • 4' �• '+r r1- �yr� :i?' •'�- _ �hi'�:, .,- s. ram.. i \y..i�� .� w"L� y�cr rtyh.. ,•t. �^_�,�tiy �' ' Y' Y``{. _ • '.}1r i► . - i .�^ _ 'V,. 4.. •!". .Y '� : I I _ 1e ' ti ,•'1 = „ _ ;�- �`• a i Y`;� ra ..[ _ �} •':r. �i = \ �.`'^. �4. v ° :� - . _ ��..=.t .. ..., rt_- �' t.i. � ts� r, ,�• 3.—>�• `tie +ts -�I.• ti- • �j'- 1.1 .$. _! �. ;�IL� . � , d•• .•� .• ' � �. _i'" �... _ Jh '4 oe'` _ �- t; _ � ••y, ,-. L , r � `ti%`/ � �_�'. .1. •�• � S,r �-' �� .^'1�'t'•� �� s�>?� Ix � Y y - r n��J4�' •.i1�-[- _ - _. �J• ♦ rr'�- ' - r r< 1. . - _•' •�+�.''�' -'�7 ` : �'' � < -:r•i . `~� =i••. ,^'tit��y}-, t .:r-C` ;i��-�'',i:: ' ': - ^- _ - - 'a �•'s" - _ Y - - � - Y .� i '�'"' `+.-�Srr �'r-,•c`,_v.�.�R.. j, � ,t �•y �'' j• µ ��.� `-Z[��-�' � � �.y-ti .`,M1 r � �S„r r - ��' � , i y - . �.:sY"r,. .. c'•'Gf`" T_.yt . � i- _ ' '- z-d ;i, . tis *.. Y'T , -x -. ; S �.. T= �� - T }' • w "L.r r� �!� � .a. ` � � t . - .s • � v yy _ �.,,. ti: - _ �3 _ Y� ; .�//rr �' - =:j: , _ - �.�,,,.w •� mil' .# '� w�i.• t `ti.- `=`5�_ -. h � '�_ "f -• f '. _ s•yr it-_r.� •,,. '_F � � :'n -i . .•,}�;} • ' ? - _ 1« . .* *_ ,•,F;l f*�'Z:.rr�a. ly. 1+".-t •• ..•�Fi'� �:.•• �"' .. ��• -� µ'S ��4t., a4•�A',". tY i ��• a�� `• _ S 'h 'at "�,i •cam}_ _ .i',`':'" - � � r;�-. r �. �. ••_ -rt. �..{„4� ='iS. wZ+"'Tr-, i �� _ - i _ •. i:'. "- r-•:Jt.�,� t;' 'r-,� :�- yqi r, tr r - tti,}'- ��! r�!' -- �- ... -. - - 'r- rr� � '�•F'• • :g �,.,, .�+.� `w �. � S. �, , [' .. , - f's •'f �r Y' :wiK ; �?�a � '� �M-z-��-�.. '•.Y'��}{��'.4_'. _ �;r'� err ..-'F�iK.r_ t'1.,. •,- - �._ :g. r� r' �..;. -cr!r' •ti :~'- fi - '�.�a . _ _ - - . * r `t u. - `.S ti �..''�• yr. •�-. _ .r a . f�-` � � � •� - _ perti . - 38 08-117-23 310001 38 08-117-23 310011 STEVE ELLIOTT 1350 BALDUR LLC 1400 BALDUR PARK RD 4400 WEST ARM RD E WAYZATA MN 55391 SPRING PARK MN 55384 38 08-117-23 310002 38 08-117-23 310012 MICHAEL & KATIE SCHROEDER 1350 BALDUR LLC 1396 BALDUR PARK RD 4400 WEST ARM RD E WAYZATA MN 55391 SPRING PARK MN 55384 38 08-117-23 310003 38 08-117-23 310013 GILBERT H GEHLE 1350 BALDUR LLC 1392 BALDUR PARK RD 4400 WEST ARM RD E WAYZATA MN 55391 SPRING PARK MN 55384 38 08-117-23 310004 38 08-117-23 310014 JAMES MORRISSEY 1350 BALDUR LLC 1384 BALDUR PARK RD 4400 WEST ARM RD E WAYZATA MN 55391 SPRING PARK MN 55384 38 08-117-23 310005 38 08-117-23 34 0013 CHRISTIAN THOMAS JOHNSON R J ROHRER/D L S HUTCHINSON JULIE A JOHNSON 1424 BALDUR PARK RD 1376 BALDUR PARK RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 310006 38 08-117-23 34 0014 1350 BALDUR LLC BRADLEY & CYNTHIA MCDONNELL 4400 WEST ARM RD E 1420 BALDUR PARK RD SPRING PARK MN 55384 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 310007 38 08-117-23 34 0015 1350 BALDUR LLC JEFFREY ULKU/MARCIA PETERSON 4400 WEST ARM RD E 1416 BALDUR PARK RD SPRING PARK MN 55384 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 310008 38 08-117-23 34 0016 1350 BALDUR LLC WILLIAM C ARONS 4400 WEST ARM RD E 1207 PAR VIEW DRIVE SPRING PARK MN 55384 SANIBEL FLA 33957 38 08-117-23 310009 38 08-117-23 34 0017 1350 BALDUR LLC WILLIAM L/KRISTI B ANDERSON 4400 WEST ARM RD E 1408 BALDUR PARK RD SPRING PARK MN 55384 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 310010 38 08-117-23 34 0018 1350 BALDUR LLC BARBARA BRANDT 4400 WEST ARM RD E JOHN RONALD ANDERSON SPRING PARK MN 55384 1404 BALDUR PARK RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 34 0059 KENT ROTH 1428 BALDUR PARK ROAD ORONO MN 55391 35 Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 8/21 /2025 1376 t4oa 1444 4018 1416 412 A2 420 1426 1434 1432 44 1 MID a . Wo \3 57\0 359a ' f Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: I I I I I I I 1 1 1384 Baldur This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us 36 PLANNING COMMISSION Date: / S �0 Sign I n ! PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR: NAME ADDRESS A ITEM # PUBLIC COMMENT in 119/1 2. 13 mil% Lctc 3. V �?Ali4m 70 &a5`7 ;TX 7. ❑ 8. ❑ 9. ❑ 10. ❑ 11. ❑ 12. ❑ 13. ❑ 14. ❑ 15. ❑ assistive listening device available upon request