Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 8, 2005 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />8. #05-3129 ASCENT INVESTMENTS, INC., ON BEHALF OF DOUGLAS KLINT, 1345 <br />REST POINT LANE -VARIAN CE <br />Peterson moved, Murphy seconded, to table Application #05-3129, Ascent Investments, Inc., on <br />behalf of Douglas Klint, 1345 Rest Point Lane, at the request of the applicant. <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />*9. #05-3130 STEPHEN AND JEAN SKORO, 2428 CASCO POINT ROAD -VARIAN CE - <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5368 <br />White moved, McMillan seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5368, a Resolution Granting a <br />hardcover variance for the property located at 2428 Casco Point Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />*10. #05-3133 BRUCE AND ELIZABETH NUSBAUM, 3480 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - <br />VARIAN CE -RESOLUTION NO. 5369 <br />White moved, McMillan seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5369, a Resolution Granting <br />Variances and a Conditional Use Permit for the property located at 3480 North Shore Drive. <br />VOTE : Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />*11. #05-3138 DAN LARKIN ON BEHALF OF SANDRA BENSON, 1376 BALDUR PARK <br />ROAD -VARIAN CE -RESOLUTION NO. 5370 <br />White moved, McMillan seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5370, a Resolution Granting <br />Variances for the property located at 1376 Baldur Park Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />12 . HOME OCCUI? A TION LICENSE REVIEW -330 FOREST ARMS LANE <br />Jeff and Tracy Cordes, 830 Forest Arms Lane, were pres ent. <br />Curtis stated in response to an inquiry regarding the home occupation license status of the landscaping <br />and contracting business at 830 Forest Aims Lane , Staff researched the file and detem1ined that no home <br />occupation license has been issued for this property. Curtis stated in cases where it is unclear whether a <br />home occupation should be classified as Level 1 or Level 2, the zon ing administrator shall make such a <br />determination subject to city council confim1ation ifrequested by the operator of the home occupation. In <br />this instance, it is unclear as to whether or not the property owners are operating a Level 2 home <br />occupation or if the use is prohibited. <br />PAGE7