HomeMy WebLinkAboutLA18-000077 (1335 Arbor St) VAR Ex A Draft Resolution
CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. ________________________
1
A RESOLUTION
APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 78-420
FILE NO. LA18-000077
WHEREAS, on September 4, 2018, John Knoblauch o/b/o Colin Keller (“Applicant”),
applied for a variance from the City Code for the property addressed 1335 Arbor Street and legally
described as:
Lot 1, Block 2, MARKVILLE Hennepin County, MN(hereinafter the “Property”);
WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a
variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section78-420 to allow interior side yard and street
side yard setbacks in addition to the previously approved variance Resolution 6864; and
WHEREAS, on September 17, 2018, after published and mailed notice in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the City Council held a public hearing, at
which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity
to speak thereon; and
WHEREAS, on September 17, 2018, the Planning Commission recommended
approval] of the variance; and
WHEREAS, on October 8, 2018, the City Council reviewed the application and the
recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota
hereby approves the requested variance as described above based on one or more of the
following findings of fact concerning the Property:
FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA18-000077. The analysis contained
within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the
above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings
are hereby incorporated by reference.
2. The Property is located in the RR-1B Zoning District.
CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. ________________________
2
3. The Property contains 0.2 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 52 feet.
4. The Property is within Tier 3 and hardcover is limited to 35 % according to the Stormwater
Quality Overlay District.
5. Applicant has applied for the following variance[s]:
a. Interior Side Yard
b. Street Side Yard
6. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and
recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance
upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values
of property in the surrounding area.
ANALYSIS:
1. “Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes
and intent of the ordinance . . . .” The applicant is proposing to construct a new single
family home on a residential lot which is consistent with the intent of the ordinance.
The variances 7.5’ interior side and 9.5’ street side request is reasonable
considering the configuration and buildable area of the property and the previous
approved variances Resolution 6964.
2. “Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the
comprehensive plan.” The variances resulting in a permit for a new single family
residence in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
3. “Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are
practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. ‘Practical difficulties,’ as used in
connection with the granting of a variance, means that:
a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not
permitted by the official controls; The applicant is proposing use of the
property in a reasonable manner with the construction on a single family
home. There is limited space to construct a conforming structure on the site.
b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The
plight of the property owner is due to the existing substandard lot size and
shape, and its uniqueness being a lot abutting 3 streets.
c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The character of
the neighborhood is not likely to be significantly altered from replacement
of the residence which is consistent in character and size with the
surrounding homes.
CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. ________________________
3
4. “Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties.” Economic
considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination.
5. “Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight
for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as
defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter
78.” This condition is not applicable.
6. “The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under
Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is
located.” This condition is not applicable, as the use for a single family home is an
allowed use in the RR-1B District.
7. “The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling
as a two-family dwelling.” This condition is not applicable.
8. “The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such
property or immediately adjoining property.” The size of the lot in the RR-1B zoning
district and abuting 3 streets is unique for the requested variances.
9. “The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the
land is located.” The size of the lot and its locations as it pertains to the existing
zoning district is peculiar to the property.
10. “The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant.” Staff finds this statement to be true to allow
for construction of a single family home on this parcel.
11. “The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or
morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter.” Granting of the
requested variances would not impair health, safety, comfort or morals and would
be in keeping with the intent of the zoning code.
12. “The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but
is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.” The application has stated the narrow
corner lot has setback challenges for construction of a single family home. The
property is unique in size location between three streets.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS:
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a
variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section78-420 to allow interior and street side yard
setbacks in addition to the previously approved variances Resolution 6864, subject to the
following conditions:
1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings.
CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. ________________________
4
2. The approved project shall conform to the survey dated 9/4/2018 and building plans
submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as
Exhibits A.
3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require
further Planning Commission and City Council review.
4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are
permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new
construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be
completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on
that date (October 8, 2019).
5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may
result in the termination of any authority granted herein.
ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 8 day of October, 2018.
ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO:
_______________________________ ________________________________
Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor