HomeMy WebLinkAbout00-2561 Scanned FileORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 28, 2000
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS-Sandy Smith, Representative
Smith stated she had no comments but would be available for any questions the Council Members
may have.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
. *(#4) #2400 MARK AND ARLETTE PL OEN, 4345/4365 NORTH SHORE DRIVE -
CLASS I SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT -RESOLUTION NO. 4424
Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Application #2400, Mark and Arlette
Ploen, and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4424, a Resolution Approving a Subdivision of a
Lot Line Rearrangement for Properties Located at 4345 and 4365 North Shore Drive;
and Granting of Variances to Lot Width. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0.
*(#5) #2554 ANN AND GIL ANDERSON, 845 WILLOW DRIVE SOUTH-VARIANCE-
RESOLUTION NO. 4425
Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Application #2554, Ann and Gil
Anderson, 845 Willow Drive South, and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4425, a Resolution
Granting Variances to Allow the Construction of an 18' by 10' Master Bedroom
Addition to the South Side of the Existing Residence. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0.
*(#6) #2558 ANTHONY AND LINDA PATTERSON, 1780 SHAD\\-VOOD ROAD -
VARIANCES-RESOLUTION NO. 4426
Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Application #2558, Anthony and
Linda Patterson, 1780 Shadywood Road, and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4426,
a Resolution Granting Variances to Permit the Construction of a Second Story,
Replacement of a Lakeside Deck, and Replacement of a Side Entrance to the Existing
Residence. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0.
*(#7) #2561 FRANK AND BARBARA PETERSON, 1261 ARBOR STREET -
VARIANCES-RESOLUTION NO. 4427 -~-....,,
Sansevere moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve Application #2561, Frank and
Barbara Peterson, 1261 Arbor Street, and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4427, a
Resolution Granting Variances to Permit Construction of a Two Stall Detached Garage.
VOTE: Ayes 2, Nays 0, Peterson Abstained.
Page 6
CITY OF ORONO
P.O. Box66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
612-249-4600
TO: Frank and Barbara Peterson
1261 Arbor Street
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance Rerre,.i,al
DATE OF MEETING: 2/28/2000
COUNCIL ACTION -MOTION:
ZONING FILE # 2561
NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: 2/29/2000
COPIES:
VOTE: 2 FOR O AGAINST
1 ABSTAINED
To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution previously mailed to you.
Please arrange to sign the 3 original resolution copies at the City Offices (Monday through
Friday, 8:00 to 4:30). All persons with an interest in the property must sign the resolutions.
You must apply for and obtain a building permit prior to the commencement of construction. (The
building permit application is a separate application from the zoning variance or conditional use
application.)
Variance approval is limited to the extent shown on approved plan and as noted in the approval
resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to further review by the City. Variance approval
expires one year after date of approval. Permit application must be submitted no later than 2-28-
2001.
If you desire certified copies of the official Council Minutes, they are available from the City Clerk
after review and approval by the City Council.
Application Date:
Completion Date:
60 Day Deadline:
1/24/2000
1/24/2000
3/24/2000
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed:
Name Wendy Bottenberg
Title Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner
Item Description: #2561 Frank and Barbara Peterson
1261 Arbor Street
Variance
DATE: 2/28/00
ITEMNO.: 1
Agenda Section:
Zoning
Zoning District:
Lot Area:
RR-lB One Family Rural Residential District (2 Acre)
14,000 s.f. (.32 acre)
List of Exhibits:
A Resolution
B Notice of Planning Commission Action (2/23/2000)
C Revised proposal to staff report of 2/23/2000
D Staff Report and Exhibits of 2/23/2000
Application: The applicants have applied · for variances to permit the constrnction of a 672 s.f.
detached garage on the northwest corner of the lot. The property currently does not have a garage
servicing it. The garage will be accessed from Minnetonka A venue . Minnetonka A venue is not a
heavily traveled street. The location of the garage is where parking space is currently located. The
lot is shaped such that it does not allow for the garage doors to face away from the street.
The property lies within 1,000 feet of French Lake, however the amount of proposed hardcover does
not exceed the allowed 35%. The requested variances are for :
1. Section 10 .03, Subd . 13: Garages: Accessory buildings which are for the storage of cars shall
have the doors thirty feet or more from the property line when doors face on a public street. The
proposed garage doors will be located 1 O' from the property line. This leaves approximately 20'
between the garage doors and the traveled paved roadway.
2. Section 10.03, Subd. 14(C): Lot Coverage: All lots of 0-1.99 acre in area are limited to 15% lot
coverage by structures. The existing house constitutes 1512 s.f. Allowed lot coverage is 15% of
14,000 s.f. or 2,100 s.f. leaving 588 s.f. available for a garage if the octagonal shed is removed.
2. Section 10.28, Subd. 5 (B): Side Street Yard Setback-The minimum requirement for side yard
adjacent to street setback in RR-1B is 50 feet. To allow the detached garage to be located 1 0' from
the side street lot line.
3. Section 10.61, Subd. 5(A): Garage stalls in 'R' Districts may not be located in a required
yard but may be as near as 10' to a rear lot line. The proposed garage will be 5' from the rear lot
line.
PLANNING COMMISSION:
The Planning Commission recommended by a 4 to 0 vote to:
Approve the application as presented, except that lot coverage will be limited to 15.0%, requiring
the garage to be sized no larger than 588 s.f., and the shed (the old Wayzata Beach "snack hut") must
be removed.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
To approve the enclosed resolution.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
VARIANCES TO
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 13 AND
SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) AND
SECTION 10.61, SUBDIVISION S(A)
FILE #2561
WHEREAS, Frank Peterson and Barbara Peterson (hereinafter "the applicants")
are owners of the property located at 1261 Arbor Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter
"City") and legally described as follows:
Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, CRYSTAL BAY MINNETONKA, according to the recorded plat
thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning
Commission held a public hearing on February 23, 2000, at which times all persons desiring
to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and
WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal
Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 13 to allow the doors of a detached garage to be
located 1 O' from the lot line where 30' is required, Section 10.28, Subdivision 5(B) and
Section 10.61, Subdivision 5(A) to allow the side yard adjacent to street setback to be 10' from
the lot line where 50' is required, and Section 10.61, Subdivision 5(A) to allow a setback of
5' from rear lot line where 10' is normally required to permit construction of a two stall
detached garage
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2561.
Page 1 of 6
2. The property is located in the RR-lB, Lakeshore Residential Zoning District
requiring 2 acres in area. The property consists of total area of 14,000 s.f. or
.32 acres.
3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 23, 2000 and
recommended approval on a vote of 4 to 0.
4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact:
A. The residence was built prior to current zoning standards.
B. The lot is unusually small and narrow for the RR-lB zoning district.
C. The property is not currently served with a garage.
D. The proposed garage location will allow the presentation of an existing
mature maple tree in the rear yard.
E. No hardship exists to justify lot coverage in excess of the 15% allowed
by code. Allowed lot coverage is 2,100 s.f.; the existing house is 1512
s.f. leaving an allowance of 588 s.f. for accessory buildings.
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar
to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that
granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely
serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a
demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial
property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and
intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments
by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety
and welfare of the community.
Page 2 of 6
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 13 to allow the doors
of a detached garage to be located 10' from the lot line where 30' is required, Section 10.28,
Subdivision 5 (B) and Section 10.61, Subdivision 5(A) to allow the side yard adjacent to street
setback to be 10' from the lot line where 50' is required and Section 10.61, Subdivision 5(A)
to allow a 5' rear lot line setback when 10' is normally required to permit construction of a 588
s.f. two-stall detached garage. Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants attached
to this resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan may require
further Planning Commission and City Council Review.
2. The garage is limited to 588 s.f. in order to meet the 15% lot coverage
limitation.
3. The applicants shall remove the historical Wayzata Beach snack hut on the
property within 90 days of receiving the building permit or prior to final
inspection, whichever is earlier, so that the property will meet the 15% lot
coverage limitation.
4. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the
applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a
building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance
will expire on that date (February 28, 2001).
5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a
misdemeanor.
6. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms
of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and
assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of
the property.
Page 3 of 6
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 28th day of February, 2000.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
Property Owner( s)
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 28th day of
February, 2000, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono,
a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
Notary Public
Page 4 of 6
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this __ day of _________ , 200_ before me a Notary Public within and
for said county, personally appeared ____________________ _
known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and
acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this __ day of _________ , 200_ before me a Notary Public within and
for said county, personally appeared ____________________ _
known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.
Notary Public
Page 5 of 6
,_ ____ ..,.. _____________ Exhibit A------------------.
0
'"+''
CERTIFICATE. OF SURVEY
Prepared for: ___ ___,;'---F_R_A_N_K_P_E_T_E_R_S_O_N ________ _
'M.INNETONKA ------A\JENtJE ~·•.. . .
-...
4'2..S --..
. -~ . . •
~ I .. ~.;;·
~~-; I ....., __
I I I I , · 2e7, L-'-I . •I . 1 ½½ I .,
0 I /J··. J_ . <:) . I 0 d \ 0 -o; ~/:n..S/'$ ~ ~ ~ 0 • i • . -; ~ <::)
:\ j 0 . '
1 I -I . ., . ' I : :r
~-
I
// l ,., --I
~_!led' L L 1 l 1/ze.o: -I
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, CRYSTAL .BAY MINNETONKA, according to the
recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota,
ARr;.A =-14-,ooo s~. TT,
;{
·1_: '
~r . , .
GENERAL 'NOTES
Denotes iron monument Page 6 of 6 -d d . I t' = , . _,,o~ 3 top of foun at1on e eva 10n
nenntes cross chiseled in concrete Prooosed basement floor elevation =
B
I-,w
w
0:::
Ill tn ':>
0
C:
e ::, ....
:.0
I 0:::: ~ o· ~
.gi co UJ 0::
<(
CITY OF ORONO
P.O.Box66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
612-249-4600
TO: Frank and Barbara Peterson
1261 Arbor Street
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance
DATE OF MEETING: February 23, 2000
ZONING FILE# 2561
NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION
ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: February 24, 2000
COPIES:
VOTE: 4 FOR 0 AGAINST
Planning Commission recommends the following:
Approved as presented, except that lot coverage will be limited to 15.0%, requiring the garage tobe
sized no larger than 588 s.f., and the shed (the old Wayzata Beach "snack hut") must be removed.
NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as:
City Council February 28, 2000, meeting starts at 7:00 p.m.
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from
the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission.
TO: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members
FROM: Wendy Bottenberg, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner
DATE: February 23, 2000
SUBJECT: #2561 Frank/Barbara Peterson
1261 Arbor Street
Variance-Public Hearing
After meeting with City staff, the applicant has revised the size of the proposed detached garage
to 24' x 28' (672s.f.). The proposed garage would still be located on the northwest corner of the
lot.
The variance for accessory building setbacks has been eliminated. However, the application still
needs three variances for:
I. Section 10.03, Subd. 13 -Garages
2. Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) -Lot Coverage
3. Section 10.28, Subd. 5(B) -Side Street Yard Setback
Structural Coverage:
Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage
14,000 s.f. Allowed: 2,100 s.f.
Existing: 1,586 s.f. 11. 3°fo
Proposed: 2,184 s.f. 15.f,P{o
The proposed structural coverage is 84 s.f. over the allowed amount. This calculation includes
the removal of the Wayzata Beach snack hut.
Hardcover Calculations:
Distance from Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed
shoreline setback hardcover hardcover hardcover
500-1,000' 14,000 s.f. 4,900 s.f. 2,211 s.f. 3,241 s.f.
(Removal of
snack hut)
The property lies within 1,000 feet of French Lake, however the amount of proposed hardcover
still does not exceed the allowed amount.
TO: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
FROM: Wendy Bottenberg, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner
DATE: February 14, 2000
SUBJECT: #2561 Frank and Barbara Peterson
1261 Arbor Street
Variance --Public Hearing
Zoning District:
Lot Area:
List of Exhibits
A Application
RR-lB
14,000 s.f.
B Site Plan/Survey
C Views
D Hardcover Calculations
E Plat Map
F Location Map
G Property Owner's List
H Permit Record
Pertinent Code Sections
One Family Rural Residential District (2 acre)
(.32 acre)
' 1. Section 10.03, Subd. 9 (E) -Accessory Building Setbacks -Accessory structures in excess of
750 s.f. but not exceeding 1,000 s.f. shall be located at least 15' from any lot line.
2. Section 10.03, Subd. 13 -Garages -Accessory buildings which are for the storage of cars shall
have the doors thirty feet or more from the property line when doors face on a public street.
3. Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) -Lot Coverage -In all zoning districts, for all lots of 0-1.99 acre in
total area, the total combined footprint areas of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed
15% of the lot area.
4. Section 10.28, Subd. 5 (B)-Side Street Yard Setback-The minimum requirement for side yard
adjacent to street setback in RR-lB is 50 feet.
#2561 Frank/Barbara Peterson
1261 Arbor Street
Variances
2/14/00
Page 1
0
Application Summary: The applicants have applied for variances to permit the construction
of a 28' x 32' (896 s.f.) detached garage on the northwest corner of the lot. The property currently
does not have a garage servicing it. The garage will be accessed from Minnetonka Avenue.
Minnetonka A venue is not a heavily traveled street. The location of the garage is where parking
space is currently located. The lot is shaped such that it does not allow for the garage doors to face
away from the street. There are two other large detached garages in the neighborhood. (One is 28'
x 24' and another is 26' x 35' , which were built in 1980 and 1990).
The property lies within 1,000 feet of French Lake, however the amount of proposed hardcover does
not exceed the allowed 35%.
• The detached garage will increase the structural lot coverage from 1,531.36 s.f. (10.9%) to
2,427.36 s.f. (17.3%) where 2,100 s.f (15%) is allowed.
• Accessory structures greater than 750 s.f. but less than 1,000 s.f. are required to be located
15' from the rear property line. The proposed garage will be located 5' from the rear property
line.
• Accessory structures to be used for the storage of cars that have doors facing the street are
required to be located 30' or more from the property line. The proposed garage doors will
be located 1 O' from the property line. This leaves approximately 20' between the garage
doors and the traveled paved roadway.
• The RR-lB zoning district requires a side street yard setback of 50'. The proposed garage
will be 1 O' from the side street lot line.
#2561 Frank/Barbara Peterson
1261 Spruce Street
Variances
2/14/00
Page2
ANALYSIS
Lot Area:
RR-lB Lot Area Side Yard Setback
Required 87,120 s.f. (2 acres) 30'
Actual 14,000 s.f. (.32 acre) 5'
Structural Coverage:
Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage
14,000 s.f. Allowed: 2,100 s.f. (15%)
Existing: 1,531.36 s.f. (10.9%) \1-$'6{.?S.f. 11..3.Q
Proposed: 2,427.36 s.f. (17.3%)
Hardcover Calculations:
Distance from Total area in Allowed Existing Proposed
shoreline setback hardcover hardcover hardcover
500-1,000' 14,000 s.f. 4,900 s.f. 2,156.36 3,372.36 s.f.
(35%) (15.4%) (24.1 %)
Statement of Hardship:
The applicants have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit A. The applicant should also
be asked for their testimony regarding this issue.
Issues of Concern:
1. The property is not currently serviced by a garage.
2. There is a mature maple tree, approximately 50 years old, the applicants wish to keep, located
just south of the proposed garage; the maple would be jeopardized by moving the garage further
from the street.
3. The shed on the survey is a historical building, the former snack hut at Wayzata Beach, hence
applicant prefers to not remove it.
#2561 Frank/Barbara Peterson
1261 Arbor Street
Variances
2114/00
Page3
4. The lot is small for the RR-1B zone, but similar in size to many other lots in the
neighborhood.
5. The residence was built prior to current zoning standards.
6. Other issues the Planning Commission may have.
Options for Action:
1. Recommend approval of the variances to allow the detached garage of 896 s.f. to be
constructed on the property as on the survey; OR
2. Move the garage 15' from the rear property line, eliminating one variance, and approve other
variances to allow a detached garage of 896 s.f. to be constructed on the property; OR
3. Advise applicant what other possible revisions will make the application approvable, and
table the application.
4. Other.
Staff Recommendation:
Review the applicant's stated hardships and determine whether justification exists to grant the
requested variances.
#2561 Frank/Barbara Peterson
1261 Arbor Street
Variances
2/14/2000
Page4
CITY OF ORONO -VARIANCE APPLICATION
Initial Application Fee $250.00
($50.00 per each additional variance)
Renewal Variance Fee $150.00
(no change from original application)
Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00
After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee)
PROPERTY INFORMAJION
Site Address I Z. c.o l +(-v bo v 5-t.v-eet
Application # 2, 5{.p I
Date Received t / 2-'(/ tro
Amount Paid 3 0 0 ®
Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) IO -I 1-r -2-3 -3 I 00 ~ 2-.
Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey.
Date Property Acquired ___________________ (month/year)
I~) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
Present use of property: X_residential __ other (specify) _________ _
Zoning District: R R j B 2 ,:i c-v -e..
APPLICANT
Name f'vaV\K P. Pe+ev":7on
Address: I z_Ct;:, I -A-v bov 5t:-.
OWNER (if different than applicant)
Name ~a..'111\ e..-
Address: -------------
Phone (home) (p I Z. -4-7 5-2. 7 Olo
Phone (work) &I Z.-3oq · &4-$""4
City: ________ Zip: ~-s, 3 Z 3
Phone (home) _______ _
Phone (work). _______ _
City: ________ Zip: ___ ----<
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost$ IS, ODO
_D_e_sc_ri_b_e_re_q_u_e_st_i_n_d_e_ta-il_: _N_e_U.J __ d_e_-h_o_c_vt_e_d_G_a_v_a_@_e.--__________ ~ _i __ :,.~_,'..:_·:·,)
(attach additional sheets if necessary) fL ~ ,,,,
VARIANCES REQUIRED
Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover
/,..,-"". Setback: Front · v Side/.S f ,J Rear
~t Coverage
_ Average Lakeshore
__ Other (specify) _______________________ _
HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS
Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing
compliance with Zoning Code requirements: 1he.. \'\I\O...t le 1T-e. \t/\ me:. \ctt..c,K ~Cl.<d )
l.;...:O u \ct \\ l.<.e.. t K e e p l+. ::t+.5 o.p~o1(i11>-C1..-k l ~ 50 \{€0-..(~ o \do .....,._ ~
'f2 1 IE . Gaa¥!f-u 11' \ toe.. o 'D JJf ah> ~~e bvu ld W'C~ on p rn per+:3 -
(attach ad 1tional s eets if necess ary)
6
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in
order for your application to be considered complete:
I.
2. Ji_
3.
4. N/4
5.
6.
7.
8.
Completed Application Form
Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you
must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of
Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-5910).
Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover
calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8½" x 11" for
reproduction.
Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing
grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8½" x 11" for reproduction.
Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8½" x 11 ").
List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in
the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s).
As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other
persons you wish notified of this application.
Additional items as may be requested by City staff.
The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your
variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning
Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment)
and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the
information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge.
7 r/
Applicant's Signature-/~:~~-~A~'------nate !( zz,/oo
l -----~---
OWNER'S SIGNATURE
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable
entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council
members for purpo_~~ investigation and verification of this request.
Date __ I ~_2_z_,_/_o_0 _ __,._
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning
Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each
month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning
Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please
make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building
& Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting.
7
. \.
J
FLOOR PLAN
GARAGE
~•a'?J'
""::t
'a
GARAGE CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES
SITE Pl.ANNING
A. The following items should be considered when
plenning end locating your garage.
• Determine size of garage required, 1, 2, or 3 cars.
• Will entrance to garage be from street or from alley.
8. Contact your local utility companies to locate
underground utilities (gas, water, sewer, septic
system etc.)
C. Before starting construction of your garage contact
vour local buifd1r,,1 r.>.,.Je vfft..;ial tu obtttu, llOCtJ!,',·,,,v
B. Layout and assemble wall on concrete slab. Nail
through plates into each end of stud with two 1 6d
nails. Square walls and temporarily nail 1 x6
diagonally to freme. Tilt up each side and end wall es
completed and brace securely. Plumb walls, equare
building and apply top plate. Lap top plate over
adjacent walls for good tie-in. Nail sections together
and notch in 1 x4 diagonHI corner bracing if plywood
sheath,no 1A not used. Frame in front wall es shown
PERSPECTIVE
....
<
.. _'-::: .. r •·
• t.:r. c'"'i'"""
• 'ff ... ., f f·-r:--·~ ·r-~ . -'-/,
C
.... -.f.r .. r .
7'
.... , .... '
,-,-,..-,,_
~ r .. r p _4!:\ ...
~ 4~ ..... ,
:J:·
~ ·(,:,;,
:::
~~-----:..__~
. -~ --.•· -•ill,1--~~--.::.-----= -.J\/·t,.IA-.-I,.-4;"' ·"""""'4.,,. ........___,,.,,.,_ ....,__ -. ,.-,..,. -~~,
J...u,""--'"··~ -,~ ...... -IJ'l-..._ ,..,,..,J,.,~ ..,_ ~ ...... -. ......_, ....,....,__
WALL FRAMING
0. 5. Studi.1
Plites1 Frost
120 -2x4
Foundition1
120 L.F. 2
7 -2x4
11 -2x4
Si -'1v ,4
. .. . .. ~~ . HARDCOVER CALCULATION '\-YORKSHEET D
SETBACK ZONE: (Cm.CLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' .<!§~.
EXISTING HARDCOVER 1N ZONE
A. House !51.f X dr = · 151:}... S.F.
Length W"idth
X = S.F.·
X = S.F.
X = s.1:.
B . ... ·.?arage · . . . X .. S.F .
. -:-·-• o • I -· ·~ c. Driveway
:':.
X = S.F.
X = S.F.
D. Sidewalk 3 X L/-3 = ·;14 · S.F .
·a.. X V, = S.F.
E. Patio/Deck J. 8. X L& = .'35c;? S .F.
X = S.F.
F. Landscape X = S.F.
Underlain X = S.F.
By Plastic X = · ·s.F.
Or Fabric
:5/-....ul i L/.4-~L/,_Lj ~ 14-S.F. G. Other X =
TOT AL HARDCOVER IN ZONE ~~11 J ,Hi&.~s.F. A .
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE -'. 1 I~ S.F. B
. A . + B li .o o . X 100 .:= l~Ma . · .· %_
. -1~ ••
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE /5/ ;J_ A. House ?it+ X o?i = S.F.
Length · Width
X = S.F.
X = S.F.
X = S.F.
B. Garage ~d-~ X cJ 8 ~4!d-i~. (/lo NiP:-S.F.
C. Driveway /0 X 3d-= 3.c90 S.F;
X = S.F.
D. Sidewalk . 3 ·x 4 3' .. = /d-'1 . -S.F •
~ X . 79-.. = I Lf'-f . :·s.F.
E. Patio/Deck .;) ;;)_ X /(p = 35~ S.F.
X = S.F.·
E :Landscape X = S.F.
· Underlain X = S.F.
By Plastic X = S.F.
Or Fabric lf-½Ju-0 3/'&d..-4. '+ tf-_ Lf re,,11~ ~ S.F. G. Other X -
3'J.O ~ ¥'1~, 3c, 'S.F. f
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE . r
TOT AL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE . = cJa'UJ,
14'00 S.F.
A ";" B /L (ooo X 100 %
<€,~L 14 (\:l l)l ~~S.
a'J..~%
14
!.()
l'--
0
L{)
0
L{)
0
L{)
-1/0
13
175
14
175
1.() t-------~
~55 en t--------'-------'---'--+-------J
..-0
~ l;f)...----
f't-----f--"----c~~c-1
oo
Cl) L{)
(D .__ __
0
L{)
0
L{)
0
L{)
I-
(j)
co
LO
0
L{)
140
0
L{)
0
LO
0
CRYSTAL AVE
122 90 91
C'0
C")
t------------<, C") C") 208 00 . .
C'0
N
(19)
208
N 175 N
L{) (58) 1 (57) LO
MJi~ K 1
0~ (186 &5 (16) &5
~ ~ (17) ..-..-
I
72 50 90
PROSPECT AVE
N
I.()
1 175 ~
(51) 175
LLE
(103) ..-
I.()
(D
93
168.35 1
fl-, (97)
1 212 f8
199 I 2 Cb
' . I
OUTlOT 8
(4)
570 . 45
3
_(~
3)
;; .... • t--
6
( 14)
i)
J,i_.
'9,)
9
(8)
e ~
.;
( 16) .., ,..,,
~ ---~-:...
:,: .
§ --
OUTLOT i~ II') A "' ~
( 17) .,
!!!
1:1-0 A, A~ .IA
5
(4)
199. 17'
7
( 6)
~
..: 6 ;;; ( 5)
fl
8 !::?
(7) 247 ,8
474 5 \IET
( I)
\
\
(34)
PROSPECT AVE E 1 175 ~ ( ~I)
175 .
2
( 52)
175
. ·· .. (·• ... ....
RUN DATE 01/18/00
BATCH 501
PROP ADDR
OWNER NAHE
TAXPAYER
NAHE/ADDR
PROP ADDR
OWNER NAHE
TAXPAYER
NAHE/ADDR
PROP ADDR
OWNER NAHE
TAXPAYER
NAHE/ADDR
PROP ADDR
OWNER NAHE
TAXPAYER
NAHE/ADDR
PROP ADDR
OWNER NAHE
TAXPAYER
NAHE/ADDR
PROP ADDR
OWNER NAHE
TAXPAYER
NAHE/ADDR
38 10-117-23 31 0028
01290 ARBOR ST
STEVEN R BENSON
STEVEN R BENSON
1290 ARBOR ST
WAYZATA HN 55391
38 10-117-23 31 0031
01250 ARBOR ST
CARY F BURTON
CARY R FARLEY
1250 ARBOR ST
PO BOX 22
CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323
38 10-117-23 31 0034
01285 ARBOR ST
CJ ALBRECHT & J L ALBRECHT
CJ & J L ALBRECHT
1285 ARBOR ST
WAYZATA HN 55391
38 10-117-23 31 0037
01290 BRIAR ST
CLARKE ZUMBACH
CLARKE ZUMBACH
1290 BRIAR ST,
WAYZATA HN 55391
' 38 10-:117-23 31 0071
01223 ARBOR ST
J HK KENNEN & LS KENNEN
JANICE & LEONARD KENNEN
1223 ARBOR ST
WAYZATA HN 55391
38 10-117-23 31 0074
01224 BRIAR ST
MAYBELL KOHLS
MAYBELL KOHLS
1224 BRIAR ST
WAYZATA HN 55391
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEH
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 10-117-23 31 0029
01270 ARBOR ST
J E FULLERTON & AH HOLDZIO
J E FULLERTON & AH HOLDZIO
1270 ARBOR ST
WAYZATA HN 55391
38 10-117-23 31 0032
01261 ARBOR ST
F & B PETERSON
F P PETERSON
PO BOX 164
CRYSTAL BAY HN ,55323
38 ,10-117-23 31 0035
01295 ARBOR ST
AL HOP~E ET AL W/L EST
LINDA SHRADER
1295 ARBOR ST
PO BOX 93
CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323
38 10-117-23 31 0038
01270 BRIAR ST
JOHN C RANGE
JOHN C RANGE
PO BOX 105
CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323
38 10-117-23 31 0072
01245 ARBOR ST
JOHN H BOLDINGH
KAREN E BJERKENG
1245 ARBOR ST
WAYZATA HN 55391
38 10-117-23 31 0099
01240 ARBOR ST
LS KENNEN & J H KELLAR
LEONARD S KENNEN
JANICE H KENNEN .
1223 ARBOR ST
WAYZATA HN 55391
REPORT NO. PI435401
38 10-117-23 31 0030
01250 ARBOR ST
CARY F BURTON
CARY F FARLEY
1250 ARBOR ST
PO BOX 22
CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323
38 10-117-23 31 0033
01271 ARBOR ST
JEFFREY E CUTSHALL
JEFFREY E CUTSHALL
1271 ARBOR ST
ORONO HN 55391
38 10-117-23 31 0036
02160 CRYSTAL AVE
H & J BLUE
HARCUS J & JUDY A BLUE
2160 CRYSTAL AVE
WAYZATA HN 55391
38 10-117-23 31 0039
01250 BRIAR ST
LAURIE A PEARSON
LAURIE A PEARSON
1250 BRIAR ST
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 10-117-23 31 0073
01245 ARBOR ST
KAREN.E BJERKENG
KAREN E BJERKENG
1245 ARBOR ST
WAYZATA HN 55391
PAGE 4
~ ~~ ro
f"t> r~~, V,
17i~,
VJ
~
~:;<~•-· ~:"."'
TOTAL BATCH 501 00017
0
PERMIT RF.CORD
---·------~----..-·-•-·---·---·-·-·---·--·------------
--·-·-----,..-·-·--------·-
-~----·--
--·---------------· ~-~---
-----"--~-----------------~
---·--------------
--~----·---·· -----
______ ..... ,--·--·---·-·-•-·-... --.. -----·-·----·-------·-.. --~
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 23, 2000
(#2559 Gilbert Gehle, Continued)
75-250' setback. Weinberger stated this proposal exceeds what was approved in the O'Keefe
by 13 square feet.
· Gehle stated he would be willing to reduce the patio.
Hawn indicated she would like to see the patio reduced to meet the same percentage that was
approved in the O'Keefe application. Hawn stated she is willing to allow the contours of the land
be restored, with no additional grading to accommodate a walkout, the existing garage and driveway
to be removed, hardcover reduced to 5,725 square feet, no tree removal in the 0-75' setback, with
the understanding the adjoining properties will not be negatively impacted by any drainage and
grading, and submittal by the Applicant of the appropriate drainage and grading plans to City Staff
for their review and comment. Hawn stated the Applicant will also need to work with City Staff on
the issue of the placement of the driveway.
Gaffron stated in his view that encompasses the issues.
Hawn moved, Smith seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2559, Gilbert G~hle,
1392 Baldur Park Road, with the understanding the Applicant will submit a grading and
drainage plan to City Staff for their review and comment subject to the grading being
limited to restoration of the existing contours of the land, with no additional grading being
allowed for a walkout; hardcover being reduced to 5,725 square feet in the south 0-75' and
the 75-250' setbacks; the existing garage and driveway being removed, with the Applicant
working with City Staff on placement of the new driveway to avoid the removal of mature
trees; and further subject to no removal of trees within the 0-75' setback.
VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
(#7) #2561 FRANK AND BARBARA PETERSON, 1261 ARBOR STREET -VARIANCES ,
9:18 p.m. -10:00 p.m.
The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted .
Barbara Peterson, Applicant, was present.
Bottenberg stated the Applicants are requesting variances to permit the construction of a
28' by 32' detached garage on the northwest corner of their lot, which will be accessed from
Minnetonka Avenue . The property currently does not have a garage. The proposed garage will be
constructed where parking space is currently located . The shape of the lot is such that it does not
allow for the garage doors to face away from the street.
Bottenberg stated the property lies within 1,000 feet of French Lake, with the amount of proposed
hardcover not exceeding the allowed 35 percent. Bottenberg stated the detached garage will
increase the structural coverage from 10.9 percent to 17.3 percent, where 15 percent is allowed.
A variance is required to allow the accessory structure to be located five feet from the rear property
line where 15 feet is required. A variance is also needed to allow the doors to be 20 feet from the
traveled paved roadway where 30 feet or more is required and a variance to side street yard setback
to permit the proposed garage to be located 1 0 feet from the side street lot line where 50 feet is
required .
Peterson presented the Planning Commission with pictures of other sheds and garages that exist in
her neighborhood . Peterson inquired whether the 15 percent structural coverage limit is geared
towards lakeshore properties or to the City at large .
Page 14
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 23, 2000
(#2559 Gilbert Gehle, Continued)
Gaffron noted City Staff has not received any formal grading and drainage plans on this property.
Gaffron stated the Applicant needs to submit a plan showing the proposed drainage and grading.
Kluth suggested a restriction be placed on this application limiting the amount of grading or table
the application to allow the Applicant time to submit a grading and drainage plan.
Weinberger stated City Staff has just received this plan recently, with the present plan showing some
grading on the property. Staff had understood the Applicant would be working within the existing
grades on the property nor did Staff anticipate any grading beyond what would be necessary to
create a natural walkout in the area.
Hawn inquired whether the Planning Commission was in agreement that grading should occur on
this property.
Nygard stated grading was not approved in the previous application.
Kluth commented it is difficult to determine what people mean by a little fill without the exact fi§ures
being spelled out.
Hawn commented it is unclear what is meant by restoring the natural contour without it being further
defined.
Gaffron stated the existing house is proposed to be removed, with the existing foundation being filled
in tc match the surrounding contour of the land, which returns the land back to its original state prior
to construction. Gaffron commented some grading may have occurred on the site prior to
construction of the original residence. Gaffron stated the Applicant is not allowed to do any grading
within the 0-75' setback.
Weinberger stated grading within the 0-75' setback requires a conditional use permit, which has
not been applied for, as well as additional variances. Weinberger inquired whether the Applicant
still wished to continue to work within the existing grades on the property.
Gehle stated he would like to work within the existing grades. Gehle stated he is not proposing to
do any grading within the 0-75' setback.
Hawn inquired whether the Applicant is agreeable to maintaining the contour of the land as it
presently exists.
Gehle indicated he is agreeable to that.
Hawn inquired whether that would be agreeable to the Commissioners.
It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the Applicant should stay within the existing
contours of the land.
Weinberger stated in the two previous applications, the applicants were given credit for the
hardcover in the south 0-75' setback. Weinberger stated it would be acceptable to Staff to keep
within the existing contours of the land.
Hawn stated she would be reluctant to approve any additional hardcover over what has been
previously approved in the O'Keefe application.
Weinberger stated O'Keefe was approved at 5,725 square feet in the south 0-75' setback and the
Page 13
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 23, 2000
(#2561 Frank and Barbara Peterson, Continued)
Nygard commented the City's policies are designed to help lessen the impact to the lake and
lakeshore as much as possible.
Peterson noted a garage located in her neighborhood did obtain a variance to structural coverage.
Peterson commented she would be willing to remove the existing shed in order to construct a
nice garage.
Botten berg stated most of the sheds located in this area have been constructed without the
necessary approvals and permits.
Peterson stated they have a one-story house and would like to construct a garage to store their
vehicles as well as other personal property.
Smith stated it can be a hardship to be without a garage in Minnesota. Smith inquired what the
structural coverage would be if the garage was reduced to 24' by 28'.
Bottenberg stated it would be 15.6 percent.
Hawn commented that the Planning Commission generally does not deviate from the 15 percent.
Hawn stated she would like to see the Applicant comply with the 15 percent, noting she does not
have a problem with the rest of the application.
Kluth inquired whether the Comprehensive Plan addresses garages at all.
Gaffron stated the City's Comprehensive Plan contains a statement which says the City will not
adopt an ordinance requiring a minimum house size nor will it specify that the house should have a
garage. The present City Council looks at the applications as if the Applicant will eventually build
a garage if it is not specified in the plan and requires that the Applicant allot some of their
structural coverage to a future garage to insure that they will comply with the 15 percent structural
coverage limit.
Hawn inquired what the structural coverage would be with a 24' by 24' garage.
Botten berg stated with a 24' by 24' garage, the Applicant would be under the allowable limit.
Bott,,nberg noted the garage cannot exceed the height of the principal structure.
Smith inquired whether the Planning Commission would be willing to allow structural coverage at
15.6 percent.
Kluth commented the Planning Commission needs to have a consistent standard to adhere to.
Hawn indicated she does not have a problem with approving the other variances, but would like to
see the Applicant comply with the 15 percent structural coverage limit.
Peterson commented a 24' by 24' garage is smaller than most of the sheds that exist in the area.
Hawn stated a 22' by 22' garage is the standard size garage, which can accommodate two cars.
Nygard commented the Planning Commission may be setting a precedent if they approve anything
in excess of the 15 percent.
Peterson stated she would also like to construct the garage to help improve the appearance of the
Page 15
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 23, 2000
(#2561 Frank and Barbara Peterson, Continued)
property, which would allow her to eliminate the need for a small storage shed. Peterson stated the
City should took at whether they are creating another problem by limiting structural coverage to the
15 percent. Peterson commented in her view property owners are forced to store cars and other
personal property outside or in small, unsightly storage sheds, which is very detracting to the
appearance of the neighborhood and appears to be a growing problem.
Smith inquired whether the Planning Commission has ever approved structural coverage in excess
of 15 percent on any other applications.
Hawn stated the City does allow Applicants to replace what is existing. Hawn noted this garage
would be considered new construction.
Kluth stated he would not be opposed to considering Minnesota winters a hardship.
Gaffron stated the City prior to 1983 granted variances to hardcover with minimal discussion if the
property exceeded the allowable limit. The City Council, starting in 1984, realized that excessive
hardcover was getting out of hand and started to enforce the limits. Over the years the City has
gotten stricter on hardcover and structural coverage.
Hawn inquired whether the Planning Commission would be in favor of building an accessory building
which exceeds the height of the principal structure.
Peterson stated this garage would be used to store vehicles, snow blower and lawn mower.
Hawn inquired whether there were any public comments regarding this application.
There were no public comments.
Kluth inquired whether the Applicant would be willing to compromise on the size of the garage.
Peterson stated she would like to build the garage as proposed.
Kluth moved to recommend denial of Application #2561, Frank and Barbara Peterson,
1261 Arbor Street, unless the proposed garage is reduced in size to comply with the
15 percent structural coverage limit. NO SECOND.
Hawn inquired whether the Applicant would be willing to construct a garage which will comply with
the 15 percent structural coverage limit.
Peterson stated her husband probably will not be agreeable to limiting it to the 15 percent and will
erect a shed to accommodate their other personal items. Peterson stated rather than deny the
application, she would be agreeable to limiting the structural coverage to 15 percent.
Kluth moved, Nygard seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2561, Frank and
Barbara Peterson, to permit the construction of a garage not to exceed the allowed
15 percent total structural coverage on the lot, and to grant variances to side yard setback,
lot coverage and location of the garage doors. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
Page 16
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) ss.
)
CITY OF ORONO )
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I, Maiy Ann Johnson, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby
certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #2561, was mailed to the
attached list of property owners.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 8th day ofFebruaiy,
2000.
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway, ·p.o, Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Phone (612) 249-4600
Fax (612) 249-4616
Affidavit of Publication
State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin.
3ill Holm, being·duly sworn on oath, says that he is
5. #2486 Elaine Erickson, 1210 m authorized agent and employee of the publisher
Spruce Place , requests lakeshore setback,
. average lakeshore setback, lot coverage and )f the newspaper known as THE LAKER, Mound,
NEW BUSINESS
hardcover variances to permit construction of v1innesota, and has full knowledge of the facts a new residence on the property and a
conditional use permit to permit grading Nhich are stated below: The Plannning Commlsison will hold .... within 75 feet.of the lakeshore
publi!, tiearings in the Council 'Chambers at • · '. · · · ' · · ··• • --· ~, ·-· • · : · · , .•. : · ,.'
2780 Kelley Parkway , .qq ::,Y-{~dne_S~!l~r.-.·~ •, k¢.•6 . r#2559~ Gilbert Gehle, 1191 :-Baldlll.
February 23, 20(?0, ~ginning at ~:30 p.m. on '. Park Road; requests a variance, to l\[!~,Z~· A.) The newspaper has complied with all the
·the matter of rev1ew11)g.the. jQllowJrig,lanli,.V~ll,; : square,feet (8.68%) hardcover wlthiir 75:feet
applications : of the lakeshore where no hardcover is requirements constituting qualifications as a
allowed, and a variance to allow 5,380 square
OLD BUSINESS
1. #2547 Kimberli and William Abbott,
470 Big Island, request after-the-fact
variances to permit structure to be located
within 75 feet of the lakeshore and
encroachment into the average lakes_hore
setback . The request includes after-the -fact
· variances for hardcover in the 0-75 foot
lakeshore setback .
2. #2551 Thomas Michael Randgaard,
2765 Shadywood Road, requests a
conditional use permit to permit a 16'
extension of a permanent dock within
Carman's Bay of Lake Minnetonka .
3. #2556 Barbara and Collins Cavender,
having an interest in 1405/1395 Rest Point
Road, request lot area and lot width
variances to permit new residential
construction on property less than the one
acre minimum lot size and less than the 140'
minimum lot width in the "LR-1B" Zoning
District; a front yard setback variance ·10
permit .a 21.37' setback, where 35' is
required; variances to permit hardcover in the
0-75 foot lakeshore setback, where no
hardcover is allowed; and variances to permit
structure within 75 feet of the OHWL of Lake
Minnetonka, where no structure is allowed.
feet (35 .42%) hardcover in the 75-250 fo?t qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota
lakeshore setback where 25% .hardcover ts . .
allowed, to permit a new residence to be Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07, and other applicable
constructed on the lot. I d d aws, as amen e .
7. #2560 Gary Marquardt, 2617
Casco Point Road, requests variances to
allow 3,557 .5 square feet (27 .95%) hardcover B ) The printed
in the 75-250 foot lakeshore setback, where • Land Use Applications
3,~04.7 square feet (18 .9%) exists and 25% is
allowed, and a lot coverage variance to
permit greater than 15% structural coverage _____________________ _
on the lot to permit construction of a 29'x24' . , .
attached garage . which 1s attached was cut from the columns of said
8~ #2561 Frank and Barbara Peterson , newspaper, and was printed and published once
1261 Arbor Street, request variances fro~ each week for 1 successive weeks· yard setbacks and lot coverage to permit ----·
construction of a 32'x28' detached garage to
be located 1 o feet from ttie north property
line.
All persons wishing to be heard are
encouraged to attend this meeting. Written
co·mments are solicited. Plans are available
In the City Offices . For an appointment,
please call 249-4600.
City ·of Orono
By: Planning Commission
Zoning
It was first published Saturday
the 5th day of February 20..QQ_,
and was thereafter printed and published every
Saturday, to and including Saturday,
Paul Weinberger;
4 , #2558 Anthony Patterson, .1780 · Administrator/Planner
·Shadywood Road, requests variances to ·
permit the addition of a second story on .the · : , ·:(Published in The Laker and Pioneer
the, ___ . day of _______ 20 __ ;
existing residence and to replace a lakeside Feb. 5 , 2000)
J _d!ck within the shoreland setback . .
\'\, ..
,ffe-01 ~ed Agenl
Subscribed and sworn to me on this
KRISTI HOLM
NOTARY PUBLIC· MINNESOTA
My Commission Expires J<111. 31, 2005
(1) o es c ass, ,e ra e paid by com~ercial users
for comparable space: $13.45 per Inch.
(2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter: $13.45.
(3) Rate actually charged for above matter: $7.49 per inch .
Each additional succ~ssive week: $5.44.
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Phone (612) 249-4600 Fax (612) 249-4616
NOTICE
The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley
Parkway on Wednesday, February 23, 2000, beginning at 6:30 p.m. on the matter ofreviewing the
following land use applications:
OLD BUSINESS
1. #2547
2. #2551
3. #2556
4. #2558
NEW BUSINESS
5. #2486
6. #2559
Kimberli and William Abbott, 470 Big Island, request after-the-fact
variances to permit structure to be located within 75 feet of the lakeshore and
encroachment into the average lakeshore setback. The request includes after-
the-fact variances for hardcover in the 0-75 foot lakeshore setback.
Thomas Michael Randgaard,2765 Shadywood Road, requests a conditional
use permit to permit a 16' extension of a permanent dock within Carman's
Bay of Lake Minnetonka.
Barbara and Collins Cavender, having an interest in 1405/1395 Rest Point
Road, request lot area and lot width variances to p_ermit new residential
construction on property less than the one acre minimum lot size and less
than the 140' minimum lot width in the "LR-1 B" Zoning District; a front yard
setback variance to permit a 21.3 7' setback, where 3 5' is required; variances
to permit hardcover in the 0-75 foot lakeshore setback, where no hardcover
is allowed; and variances to permit structure within 75 feet of the OHWL of
Lake Minnetonka, where no structure is allowed.
Anthony Patterson, 1780 Sbadywood Road, requests variances to permit the
addition of a second story on the existing residence and to replace a lakeside
deck within the shoreland setback.
Elaine Erickson, 1270 Spruce Place, requests lakeshore setback, average
lakeshore setback, lot coverage and hardcover variances to permit
construction of a new residence on the property and a conditional use permit
to permit grading within 75 feet of the lakeshore.
Gilbert Gehle, 1392 Baldur Park Road, requests a variance to allow 750
square feet (8.58%) hardcover within 75 feet of the lakeshore where no
hardcover is allowed, and a variance to allow 5,380 square feet (35.42%)
hardcover in the 75-250 foot lakeshore setback where 25% hardcover is
allowed, to permit a new residence to be constructed on the lot.
7. #2560
8. #2561
Gary Marquardt, 2617 Casco Point Road, requests variances to allow
3,557.5 square feet (27.95%) hardcover in the 75-250 foot lakeshore setback,
where 3,204.7 square feet (18.9%) exists and 25% is allowed, and a lot
coverage variance to permit greater than 15% structural coverage on the lot
to permit construction of a 29'x24' attached garage.
Frank and Barbara Peterson, 1261 Arbor Street, request variances from yard
setbacks and lot coverage to permit construction of a 32'x28' detached garage
to be located 10 feet from the north property line.
All persons wishing to be heard are encouraged to attend this meeting. Written comments are
solicited. Plans are available in the City Offices. For an appointment, please call 249-4600.
To be published the week of February 5, 2000
Posted at: Orono City Offices
Crystal Bay Post Office
Long Lake Post Office
Navarre Post Office
CITY of ORONO
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
Municipal Offices
DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
In accordance with M.S. 13.04, Subd. 2, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to
inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its
departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information.
You are notified that:
1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the
permit or license requested.
2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit
or license.
3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the
extent necessary to process the permit or license.
4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some
information may become public.
5. You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 (see following page) to review private data;
on yourself.
6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit.
f""vcaY\ jc:::. Pa l.(__l .f etev--5oVJ
First Middle Last
l 2.<.o l A-vbov St. P. 0-Box l<.p4
Address
Cv~stal ba.~ MN 55?23 (eo,2-)4-7S• 2 7 o Co
City State Zip Phone
I understand my rights as stated above.
h~~ / /4 ,A-. ··--_.
/ Signature
Telephone (612) 249-4600 • Fax (612) 249-4616 9
SignatureSec.13.04 RIGHTS OF SUBJECTS OF DATA
Subdivision 1. Type of data. The rights of individual on whom the data is stored or
to be stored shall be as set forth in this section.
Subd. 2. Information required to be given individual. An individual asked to supply
private or confidential data concerning himself shall be informed of: (a) the purpose and
intended use of the requested data within the collecting state agency, political subdivision, or
statewide system; (b) whether he may refuse or is legally required to supply the requested data;
( c) any known consequence arising from his supplying or refusing to supply private or
confidential data; and ( d) the identity of other persons or entities authorized by state or federal
law to receive the data. This requirement shall not apply when an individual is asked to supply
investigative data, pursuant to section 13.82, subdivision 5, to a law enforcement officer.
The commissioner of revenue may place the notice required under this subdivision in
the individual income tax or property tax refund instructions instead of on those forms.
Subd. 3. Access to data by individual. Upon request to a responsible authority, an
individual shall be informed whether he is the subject of stored . data on individuals, and
whether it is classified as public, private or confidential. Upon his further request, an
individual who is the subject of stored private or public data on individuals shall be shown the
data without any charge to him and, if he desires, shall be informed of the content and meaning
of that data. After an individual has been shown the private data and informed of its meaning,
the data need not be disclosed to him for six months thereafter unless a dispute or action
pursuant to this section is pending or additional data on the individual has been collected or
created. The responsible authority shall provide copies of the private or public data upon
request by the individual subject of the data. The responsible authority may require the
requesting person to pay the actual costs of making, certifying, and compiling the copies.
The responsible authority shall comply immediately, if possible, with any request made
pursuant to this subdivision, or within five days of the date of the request, excluding Saturdays,
Sundays and legal holidays, if immediate compliance is not possible. If he cannot comply with
the request within that time, he shall so inform the individual, and may have an additional five
days within which to comply with the request, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays.
Subd. 4. Procedure when data is not accurate or complete. An individual may
contest the accuracy or completeness of public or private data concerning himself. To exercise
this right, an individual shall notify in writing the responsible authority describing the nature
of the disagreement. The responsible authority shall within 30 days either: (a) correct the data
found to be inaccurate or incomplete and attempt to notify past recipients of inaccurate or
incomplete data, including recipients named by the individual; or (b) notify the individual that
he believes the data to be correct. Data in dispute shall be disclosed only if the individual's
statement of disagreement is included with the disclosed data.
The determination of the responsible authority may be appealed pursuant to the
provisions of the administrative procedure act relating to contested cases.
10
Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form
I (we) -:fef"pie.evf C U171-tt\-L-{..
[print name(s)]
of I 2. 7\ -A-vbot1 St::. -------------[print address]
have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located
at IZli?/ Avloov 5t"", also referred to as Land Use Application No. ___ _
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to
declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City
Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's
project or use requires Council approval.
Date
Property Owner Date
******************************************************************************
I (we) s~ ~ l..vv\·Q L"'--~,·--
[print name( s)]
of l c S"O J::::l""-1
c&r: S~ ·
[print address]
have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located
at I 2..0 / ftr.bov also referred to as Land Use Application No. ____ .
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to
declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City
Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's
project or use requires Co911cil approval.
_,,,,-/
,/"----////'
C -/ '------/-L:S -OCJ
Date
Property Owner Date
If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use
Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days
prior to the scheduled meeting date.
8
RUN DATE 01/18/00
BATCH 501
PROP ADDR
OWNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
PROP ADDR
OWNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
PROP ADDR
OWNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
PROP ADDR
OWNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
PROP ADDR
OWNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
PROP ADDR
OWNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
38 10-117-23 31 0028
01290 ARBOR ST
STEVEN R BENSON
STEVEN R BENSON
1290 ARBOR.ST
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 10-117-23 31 0031
01250 ARBOR ST
CARY F BURTON
CARY R FARLEY
1250 ARBOR ST
PO BOX 22
CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323
38 10-117-23 31 0034
01285 ARBOR ST
CJ ALBRECHT & J L ALBRECHT
CJ & J L.ALBRECHT
1285 ARBOR ST
WAYZATA MN 55391
·38 10-111-23 31 0037
01290 BRIAR ST
CLARKE ZUMBACH
CLARKE ZUMBACH
1290 BRIAR ST.
WAYZATA MN 55391
' 38 10-:117-23 31 0071
01223 ARBOR ST
J MK KENNEN & LS KENNEN
JANICE & LEONARD KENNEN
1223 ARBOR ST
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 10-117-23 31 0074
01224 BRIAR ST
MAYBELL KOHLS
MAYBELL KOHLS
1224 BRIAR ST
WAYZATA MN 55391
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 10-117-23 31 0029
01270 ARBOR ST
J E FULLERTON & AH MOLDZIO
J E FULLERTON & AH HOLDZIO
1270 ARBOR ST
WAYZATA HN 55391
38 10-117-23 31 0032
01261 ARBOR ST
F & B PETERSON
F P PETERSON
PO BOX 164
CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323
38 ,10-117-23 31 0035
01295 ARBOR ST
AL HOP~E ET AL W/L EST
LINDA SHRADER
1295 ARBOR ST
PO BOX 93
CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323
38 10-117-23 31 0038
01270 BRIAR ST
JOHN C RANGE
JOHN C RANGE
PO BOX 105
CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323
38 10-117-23 31 0072
01245 ARBOR ST
JOHN M BOLDINGH
KAREN E BJERKENG
1245 ARBOR ST
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 10-117-23 31 0099
01240 ARBOR ST
LS KENNEN & J H KELLAR
LEONARD S KENNEN
JANICE H KENNEN
1223 ARBOR ST .
WAYZATA M~ 55391
REPORT NO, PI435401
38 10-117-23 31 0030
01250 ARBOR ST
CARY F BURTON
CARY F FARLEY
1250 ARBOR ST
PO BOX 22
CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323
38 10-117-23 31 0033
01271 ARBOR ST .
JEFFREY E CUTSHALL
JEFFREY E CUTSHALL
1271 ARBOR ST .
ORONO HN 55391
38 10-117-23 31 0036
02160 CRYSTAL AVE
H & J BLUE
MARCUS J & JUDY A BLUE
2160 CRYSTAL AVE
WAYZATA HN 55391
38 10-117-23 31 0039
01250 BRIAR ST
LAURIE A PEARSON
LAURIE A PEARSON
1250 BRIAR ST
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 10-117-23 31 0073
01245 ARBOR ST
KAREN_E BJERKENG
KAREN E BJERKENG
1245 ARBOR ST
WAYZATA HN 55391
PAGE 4
~~::,;1;:w·-·
TOTAL BATCH 501 00017
RUN DATE 01/18/00
BATCH 501
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEH
. PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
REPORT NO. PI435401
PAGE 5
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE
REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST
OF HY KNOWLEDGE AND B:~::Fr:_11 _/)/JP 1il2f WJL~
Applicant:
Address:
TRACKING SHEET
FILE NO. d-6 IP I
Staff: '\A /.e (/\ Q,( J.
0
-_ Erut ~I &v 62 .rCL _ ~Pv ~rsovu
-r~0l · kt:aY -~ee+
Cr~;s-fil \ ~
J2r Meeting with Staff: -':R ...... ~c=-.;_=-:_ ______ _
l2f Date Application Completed: I -a. W -D ()
D Incomplete Notice Sent: --------
lZf Date Property Owners Notified: ()_-8-d-OOD
)2r Date Legal Notice Published: a--~ -aoci 0
J2f PC Meeting(s): r:= VQ , ~ j 1 ;;)_C)C) 0
IZf Notice of PC Action: ~L~6 Lc).o o o ' ,
[:a" City Council Meeting(s): a-/d-& /a-o o o
. ,
D Resolution
X:\APPS\WPWIN60\WPDOCS\CAROLE\FORMS\TRKNG .SIIT
60Day: g -H oo
Vote: 4 ..,0 tip\~
Vote:
Vote:
Vote: ~-a.-o--· t_~
. -~_.,,..
-Vote:
. -~-
Vote: