Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-25-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meetingAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, APRIL 25, 1988, 7:00 P.M. (*) Asterisl• items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion dy the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will he held upon request. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which maybe obtained upon request from the Recorder. f'%i! M ' TiNG ROLL CALL 1. CONSi 4T h(;F:NDA* ^nD 2. 7:0I P.M. PUBLIC HEAR.NG - Highwood Road Area Storm Sewer OF GF APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 3. Regular Meeting of 11, 1988 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATICA !DISTRICT REPORT - JoEllen Hurr Representative 4. A) Metro Council Review B) Executive Director Selection PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT * 5a. #1169 wear Enterprizes Partnership, 2950 Watertown Road - Final Subdivision - Resolution b. #1169 Wear Enterprizes Partnership, 2950 Watertown Road - Road Name Request 6. 41211 Gerald Neslund/ McCaffrey, 1225 Orono Oaks Drive, Conditional Use Permit 7. #1233 Michael Halley Homes Inc., 271.5 Pence Lane - Conditional Use Permit - Variance 8. #1244 Dale Palm, 1710 Shadywood Road - Variance - Denial Resolution 9. #1264 Tom Smieja, 20 Cygnet Place - 'Variance ENGINEER'S REPORT 10. Woodhill Road Plans and Specs - Resolution MAYOR'S REPORT 11. Planning Commission Interviews 8:30 P.M. *12. Wayzata Community Education 13. Administrator's 88-89 Goal Setting and Compensation CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 14. City Property/Sale and Easement - Pheasant Road 15. County Road 116 - Request for Resolution 16. County 15 Lighting - Design Engineer Report *17. Mobile Peddler Ordinance *18. Resolution of Recognition *19. Proclamation Minnesota Cities Week - Resolution *20. Salary Adjustment - Carol Hansing *21. Resignation - Jerome Smith *22. Board of Review - April 27, 1988 *23. Removal of Weight Restrictions *24. willow/Highway 12 Signalization *25. Administrator's Inforrtation City/School Intervention Agreements Teri Naah Waterfowl Amendment AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, APR+' -', 1988, 7:00 P.M. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT LICENSES (26*) BILLS (27*) ADJOURNMENT ,-0,4401 P.pp� 251-L:7 .. TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator p Y OF 00))NO DATE: April 15, 1988 SUBJECT: Highwood Storm Sewer Project Attachments: A. Highwood Storm Sewer Memo Dated 8/31/87 A. Highwood Storm Sewer Memo Dated 3/23/88 C. Feasibility Study D. Dale McCurdy Letter Dated 4/5/88 E. Vongries Letter Dated 4/l/88 F. Draft Resolution (not included) G. Highwood/19 Map H. Proposed Cost Per Property ISSUES - 1. Holding of scheduled public, hearing. 2. Determination of Council's response to petition and public hearing comments. 3. If Council choses to undertake a remedy to problem identified by the petition, the means chosen to rectify it. 4. Outline of the process to be undertaken. 5. Determination of preliminary financing alternatives if undertaken. INTRODUCTION - As noted in Attachment B the Council directed a feasibil_ity study be undertaken regarding the storm water problem in the Highwood area. At the Council's March 28, 1988 meeting they directed staff to set up a public hearing having received the feasibility study on the project. DISCUSSION Issue 1. Public Hearing - Appropriate notice has been sent regarding the public hearing to the residence in the area together with newspaper notification. Issue 2. Response to Petition - The Council had received a petition from�7 of the ne ighbors and it is or, this basis that the Council ordered the feasibility study and established the public hearing. Signers of the petition represent _ percentage of the persons in the drainage area contributing their storm water through this drain space. Council, if it desires, can take no further action. This leaves either the situation at the status quo or leaves the private parties affected to generate a private solution, which may require City approval.. Issue 3. Means to Undertake - Should the Counci 1 choose to go 1 ahead the means for dealing with this problem are outlined as follows: 1. Alternatives in Feasibility Study A. 21 inch pipe down the access B. 21 inch along line of current drainage tile 2. Other Alternatives A. The property owners can replace the existing ti le line and increase the size of the pipe from 8"-10" t i le to 15" CMP (cor r igated metal pipe) with an overflow structure at the outlet end of the culvert under Highwood Road. We could assist the property owners in obtaining materials and contractors. B. The City could replace this existing t he line with a 15" CMP (corrigated metal pipe) with an overllow structure at the outlet end of the culvert under Fighwood Road. City forces could do this for $15,000 - $16,000, we would need easements from two or three property owners. C. Construct an overflow at the outlet end of the culvert under Highwood Road approximate cost $500.00. 0. Burming of properties most directly affected by the ponding E. Restriction of flow at culvert on 19 F. Installation of a manhole on the current line together with an overflow at point shown on Attachment G G. Road drainage 1. raising to direct flowage 2. lowering to direct flowage Issue 4. Process for Project - Following are the steps in the project should the Council desire to carry it out. 1. Receive the petition 2. Feasibility study 3. Public hearing 4. Development of plans and specs 5. Submission of bids and award Any necessary CUP/Variance/Land Use 6. Project construction 7. Project completion 8. Special assessment hearing (The Council could, in 2 advance of the project being undertaken, spread the special assessment based on bid information.) Issue S. Preliminary Financing Plan - Primary means for financing are as follows: A. Storm Sewer Assessment - The Council undertake the project and choose -this alternative. The cost per square footage on a flat basis would be or if some consideration were given by a greater charge for the prope►ties directly there may be a split between and Attachment F Shows approximate assessment dollars by property and who the property owner is. B. Storm Sewer District - The City could establish a storm sewer district for this area and on an ad valorem basis and levy taxes over a specific period to pay off this project. The advantage of this approach is that the benefit principle does not have to be demonstrated. ALTERNATIVES - Issue 1. Public Hearing a. Conculde the public hearing b. Hold the public hearing open for further testimony at further Council meeting. Issue 2. Response to Petition 1. Choose not to undertake the project 2. Determine a public solution is appropriate to this problem. 3. Table for future meeting Issue 3. Means to Undertake 1. Take a combination of the following: A. 21 inch pipe down the access B. 21 inch along line of current drainage tile 2. Other Alternatives A. The property owners can replace the existing tile line and increase the size of the pipe from 8"-10" tile to 15" CMP (corrigated metal pipe) with an overflow structure at the outlet end of the culvert under Highwood Road. We could assist the property owners in obtaining materials and contractors. B. The City could replace this existing tile line with a 15" CMP (corrigated metal pipe) with an overlfow structure at the outlet end of the culvert under Highwood Road. City forces could do this for $ 1 5, 000 - $ 16, 000, 3 we would need easements from two or three property owners. C. Construct an overflow at the outlet end of the culvert under Highwood Road approximate cost $500.00. D. Burming of properties most directly affected by the ponding E. Restriction of flow at culvert on 19 F. installation of a manhole on the current line together with an overflow at point shown on Attachment G G. Road drainage 1. raising to direct flowage 2. lowering to direct flowage Issue 4. Process of Protect -- - -- --- --- -- --- 1. Direct the process be undertaken 2. Alter the process and adopt 3. Table 4. Undertake Issue 5. Preliminary Financing A. Do as a storm sewer assessment B. Do as a storm water district C. Table D. Choose not to undertake RECOMMENDATION - It i;, recommended that the Council conduct the public hearing and continue that public hearing to the meeting of May 25th at which time it is recommended that Council consider the issues of whether Council wants to undertake the project, the means to undertake it, the process by which it is being done and the financing. PROPOSED MOTIOP, - Moved by , seconded by , that the Council following preliminary discussion and continuing the public hearing defer further discussion to May 25, 1988 leaving the record open and that Council undertake discussion of the balance of the items related to this issue. Ayes --, Nays _ 4 9187.3 16 TO: Mayor and City Council d�r (o FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato, DATE: August 31, 1987 SUBJECT: Highwood Road Storm Sewer - Feasibility Study Attachment: A. Storm Sewer Request - Highwood Dated 8/20/87 B. Map of Anticipated Study Area C. Storm Sewer Project Process D. Proposed Highwood Storm Sewer Resoluticn E. Letter to Residents Dated 9/l/87 ISSUE - The Council to determine if they want to undertake the necessary feasibility study for an approximate cost of S3,500.00. The feasibility study would assist in determining if it is appropriate for a storm Newer project to be undertaken in the Highwood Road area. INTRODUCTION_ - At the Council's August 24, 1967 Council meeting Council at staff's request tabled the item until the Septemer 14, 1987 Council meeting. Its noted in Attachment A some of the residents in the neighbcr':ood have expressed an interest in a storm w&ter sewer study. (At present the size of the district and number of property owners effected has not been determined.) DISCUSSION - dhile the storm of the millenium brought the issue to a head particularly a,- it relates to Mr. Sauer's property, (annotated on Attachment ,; there is a problem in this area when there is any 3 to 4 inc'n -ain. Intent of the feasibilit< <:tudy is to determine; a.) the extent of ',he poblem, b.) the inadequet:- of the current sv_ stem if any, c.) the cost of s.;.:h a project and d.) if the benel'.. -- gamed are worth that cost. At that point it would bo )ropriite that the City decide; a.) if a project 1;- ,ld be undertaken, b.) if so, how t- , project would be financed, c.) whf they the C ' ; , would be willing to participate, d.) if once thre : t- are ' in the people in the area are still intern- in th ect. The City does have recen'. oerien ;th property owners who desire scry ice, but who c'� feel t1 the cost of that sery ice is in direct proportion it benefit as evidenced with the Crystal Bay project. At in the sewer situation all of the property owners do receiv., direct benefit. For storm sewer projects the usual metho,-! determine all the persons in the drainage district and that then those persons are assessed on an area basis as to what they contribute to the drainage runoff. The problem is that the people on the high ground generally do not consider the water to be a problem and it is only the people on the low ground that would receive a direct and obvious benefit from such a project. At the point that the feasibility study is completed and it is determined that the benefits do outweigh the costs and those to be assessed are not willing to sign a 100% petition waiving assessment of those costs, staff will present possible alternatives for either City participation if deemed appropriate by the Cot, sil or establishment of a general fund levy to use to fund all storm sewer projects that the Council deems appropriate. The advantage (A going with the general fund levy is that this is not appealable, however to the extent only limited isolated projects are undertaken the general populous does not benefit from the levy. This is particularly the case in an area where it is anticipated frost or a substantial amount of the properties particularly those located on the lake or next to wetlands are not in need of any future storm water work. RECOMMEN_DATIO_N_ -Based on the concern as evidenced in the petition together with staff's recommendation that the problem is appropriate to undertake a feasibility at this point. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by __, seconded by _, to direct the City Engineer to form a feasibility study to determine the appropriate remedy to limit the storm water runoff which causes a problem in the Highwood area. Ayes + , Nays _ July 27, 1987 TO: City of Orono PO lox 66 Crystal Bay, Mid 55323 FROM: Glen Sauer 4104 Highwood Road Mound, MN 55364 To Whom It May Concern: I would like to haVL the city look into a storm sewer system to handle the water that flows through Glen's back yard from natural runoff for about a four block area. In Glen's yard there is a 20 inch culvert which runs under Highwood Road. And on the other side, many years ago, people ran a 10 inch 'tile down to the lake instead of having a drainage ditch which kept washing out to cross to get to their house. The water ets to 8 feet deep in pla s of Glen's yard and floods through other 9 yards. The house at 41OCt- hich is next to Glen's, had water in the basement from this last flood. On the lake side of Highwood Road and County Road 19, three more families had their yards, trees, and shrubs washed out by this water also. There is a fire lane across Highwood Road from Glen's yard that a storm sewer could be run down to the lake between 40 1and 4075 Highwood Road and still leave the regular drain in use. J. I have talked to some of the neighbors and they have agreed that this would take care of the problem. Below are their signatures and addresses so you can verify that what I say is true. Enclosed please find pictures taken after this last storm that prove the need for this sewer system. Please keep me informed on Any decisions made. Thank you. Sincerely,, Glen Sauer Enclosures j Neighbor's Signature Address VV AL Nz, , cle 14 4- IF --Ab. Z $own ANN acted future condition of city finances and thi lkpaying capability of the property ow ers make such an economic study, the ouncil shout first prepare or have prepared report con tai tng the following information. 1. The boundaries r.` the area defined bene- fi 2. The otal market valuation Of all lands in the b ,tefited area plus the arket value of each i iividual parcel or to . 3. The kin s of land use i�the area and the percenta a of land u used for urban purposes. / 4. The estima d cost of he improvement and the amount to be aid from the general fund. 5. The total a '•u payable from special assessments an a estimated levy against each parcel of I d. 6. The ratio of s e ial assessments to market valuations for th area as a whole and for each individ al pa cel, and also the ratio of all outstan ing a unpaid prior assess- ments plu the pro sed one to the market value for II land in the area and for each individu parcel. 7. The es/imated increase 'n market value for each arcel of property the irnproven�ent ism de. 8. T total amount of bonds to be issued and t eir proposed maturity. I Summary of Steps in Special Assessment Proceedings The purpose of such a report i to indicate whetii r the proposed assessment w old i3� ion beau a financial burden on the prop ty ,l, ncrs invo ed and whcthe the prepared asses mec.'; are wit7in the limitations imposed b the rut the t the ass' sment on a parcel cannot exceed the a - unt of increased market value as a result of t•: 1;1.1- pr vement. It also should give some idea re fi aneial burden wh,zh would be placed urpn ":z ty itself, in term: of both the demand _ ,-,n oney in the general fund and the impact : ii 'ie city's borrowing capacity. In general, the local imp19vement code con- templates the following steps: 07 - Initiation of proceedings. This may be done either by the council or by petition of affected property owners. If a petition is used, it must be signed by the owners of at least 354''0 in frontage of the property bordering on the proposed improvements. Even if the council acts originally on its own initiati an extraordinary majority is riot needed to initiate the proceedings. In initiating proceedings, or in accepting a petition requesting proceedings, the council should simultaneously order a feasibility report on th,, proposed improvement 1 2. Preparation of a report. The law requires that a report on the feasibility of the proposal be prepared by the city engineer or by some other competent person select- ed by the council. This report should, but need not, contain the data suggested above under the headin• "Determining Economic Feasibility." It r,"lust cover such factors as the need for the project, the availability of necessary money in the general fund to pay tF ty's share of the cost, an estimate of -ost, and any other information thougi., pertinent and neceyiry for complete council considera- tion. 3. Public hearing. This step may be omitted when a petition requesting the improve- ment has been signed by 1000,0' of the affected land owners. Notice of the hearing must be published twice in the official newspaper with each publication appearing at least a week apart. At least three days must elapse between the last publication date and the date set for the hearing. Furthermore, a notice must be mailed to each property owner in the area to be assessed 10 days prior to the hearing stating the time and place of th,_ hearing, the general nature of the improvement, the estimated cost, and the area proposed to be assessed. At the hearing, the interested persons should have a chance to be heard, WIIvthci (ir not they are liable to be as scssed. I ; Ordering the improrimc►it and prepar,t. n of flans. The resolution ordering the improvement may be passed by a mere majority of the council if proceedings were originally commenced by petition. If not, the resolution must be adopted by an affirmative vote by at least four -fifths of the council. It is after this that the city cngincer should prepare the necessary plans and specifications. At this point the council should decide how the work is to be d?� : and, if necessary, issue a call for bids. Tinrc limits Jar local i►npror•cmcnts. When a city council determines to make a public improvement, it must let the contract for all or part of the work, or order all or part of the work, clone by day labor or other- wise, no later than o,)e year after the adoption of the resolution ordering the improvement, unless a different time is specifically stated in the resolution order- ing the improvement. Perfonnance of work wider contract or by day labor. The work may be done by day labor if the estimated cost does not exceed 5,000, if there are no bidders on the project, or if the only bids received exceed the estimated cost of the project. The term "day labor" refers to a procedure whereby the city carries out a public improvement with its own employees or with persons specifically hired for that purpose. No contract is given under this system; the city itself assumes full responsibility for the work. Even under this system, however, purchases of more than $5,000 must be obtaine�l6 from the lowest responsible bidder. (See Chapter 21.) Preparation of prop051d assc3Vnent rolls. These mutt contain the information listed in the next subsection of this chapter. ThYi preparation is the clerk's responsibili- ty. It may be desirable to conduct before and after market improvement valuation studies regarding propertv to be assessed to determine the amount of special I enefits. (Sec discussion of markt-t value, above). l'uhlic hearing on the p►opo.sed as,essmcnt The purpose of this sccunu , ong is to give affected property owners an op- portunity to be heard on the matter of the actual assessments being levied. Notice must be published one or more times in the official ne�%spaper and mailed to each property owner at least two weeks prior to the hearing date. Finally, the total cost of the improvement project must be published in the city newspaper or, if none, in a county seat newspaper.18 It may be advisable in light of recent court decisions, to make available to the property owner an adversary proceeding at this hearing where evidence of market value improvement will be considered and made a part of the assessment determination. The hearing notice should contain a state- ment that those who wish to dispute their assessment as determined in usual formula fashion may notify, the council, and the council can then arrange for a hearing before an impartial hearing officer. The property owner could then put in such testimony as he thinks is relevant con- cerning the improvement in market value of this property, and the city could do likewise. A detailed r::cord of this evidence shou!d be made. The city could than adopt the assessment roll, including assessments determined on a conventional formula basis and also including those determined in adversary proceedings. Apprv-.,al and certification of' assessment rolls, ,after the public hearing, the council must approve the assessment rolls in theif`4oul form so that the clerk can certify therm,— o the county auditor for coilec- tion. The council should examine their assess- menz rolls in a very practical way to dcter-•,ine whether or not an appeal is likel-, to result from a particular assessment and w;l:ther that assessment is realistic in view zff the real estate market in their city. 10. lssurrcc of obligations to finance the impru:_n,ent (This topic is discussed further ;.i the subsection entitled "Borrow- ing for `p ecial Assessment Purposes.") For a full ':SCL • _'c of these sups, plus a full set of model Bern s_ League publication "Local Improvcmcrr! (.0 - 408 - 71ll0 1 . L City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. RESOLUTION ORDERING STORM SEWER FRESIBILITY REPORT FOR STORM WATER IN THE HIGHWOOD/NOR`1'H SHORE DRIVE AREA WHEREAS, the City of Orono has received a petition from seven Highwood Road area residents requesting the City to review a storm water ponding problem, and WHEREAS, the City staff has reviewed the petition and has determined that further stud; of the area is necessary to determine the extent of the storm water problem, and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the information presented to them and received comments from the affected property owners, and WHEREAS, the Orono City COUI-cil feels that more information is needed to determine the extent of an existing storm water ponding problem and if the existing storm sewer system is inadequate, and WHEREAS, the most efficient me-ner in which to obtain this information is to perform a feasihil'_ty study, which will determine the extent of the problem, ;.i one exists, number of acres included in the drainage area and ?.e most efficient and cost effective manner in which to proc(:c.: if it is determined to be a significant problem involving City e`_ )rono action. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVEI..Ir }.at the City Council of the City of Orono that the City Engine or b-E instructed to study and report to the Council with all conver.-.t•.,t speed, advising the Council in a preliminary way as to the fe&,;,ibility and estimated costs to benefitted properties in the ut.cii water run-off area. Adopted by the City Council t e City of Orono this 14th day of September, 1987. James f:.--;c�_,_i --Yiyor- ATTEST: Dorothy M. Harlin, City Clerk September 1, 1987 Pear Highwood Road Resident: On July 27, 1987, the City of Orono received a petition from seven Highwood Road residents requesting the City to look into a storm sewer in your area. Please be advised that the Orono City Counc? 1 will review this matter at the regular Council meeting on September 14, 1987. The meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. Your comments at this r.eeting will determine whether or not the Council will proceed with a feasibility study regarding the storm water ponding problem. If yo+l have any questions, please cAll me at 473-7357. Sincerely, John R. Ge:hArdso.l, Public works Diiezr.or JRG/tln TO: Mark Bernhardsor., City Adm ,,)r FROM: John R. Gerhardson, Public ,irector ^ la. TE: March 23, 1988 SUBJECT: Highwood Storm Sewer Feasibility Report In August 1987 the Orono Council directed the City Engineer to perform a feasibility study for storm sewer in the Highwood area. The reason for the study was due to a petition by Highwood residents requesting a sol,ition to a storm water ponding problem. Attached for review is the feasibility study performed by the engineer. Or. page 5 of the report is a recommended schedule to follow if we wish to proceed, however I feel April 11 is too soon to hold a public hearing due to necessary notification to residents and publication of notice in the legal newspaper. Recommendation - To accept the storm sewer feasibility report for the Highwood z ^a ac presented and to designate April 25, 1988 as the public hearing (late. Proposed mc;tion moved, second, to accept the storm sewer f-asibi1ity report for the Highwod area as presented and to designate April 25, 1088 as the public hearing date. TO: Mayor Grabek, Orono Council Members FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato�'7Yb ATTACHMENT: A) Highwood storm sewer memo dated August 31, 1987 B) Excerpt of council minutes 8/24/87 and 9/10/87 C) Highwood storm sewer resolution Forward recommending approval. At the pu d is heaL inq staff will address the issues of road and storm water drainage, -stimated costs by lot, an alternative to raising the road grade and areas where temporary and permanent easements are needed. cc: John Gerhardson MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII, MEETING 11I.LD AUGUST 24, 1987 MINNE..11APA CREEK WATRRS11L•'D DISTRICT APPOINTMENTS City Administrator Bernhardson noted the vacancies on the Minnehaha Watershed District along with a letter from the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District with three individuals named that would like to fill the vacancies. City Attorney Blatz explained the reasons for the the two vacancies. Mayor Grabek suggested that the Executive Director of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, currently Frank Mixa, serve as the LMCD represenative on the I Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. No formal actior 1 was taken. I PUBLIC INFORMATION - EVALUATION City Administrator Bernhardson explained the issue of determineing whether the City of Orono will continue with the "Mayor's Article" on a monthly basis or budget for a different format for its monthly "newsletter" to the community. He felt that the current format has proven to be a timely means in most cases of the primary information to the community. Council thanked the Weekly News and Pione.: representatives in attendance for their assistance in this matter. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Mayor Grabek, that the "Mayor's Article" format for communication of inforamtion to the community be continued in the weekly newspaper, soliciting ideas from Councilmembers and the public as to topics they would like to have addressed and the system be evaluated next August in the budget meeting. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. HIGHWOOD STORM SEWER REQUEST Council tabled this matter until the Highwood residents could be notified to attend the Council meeting tc discuss this issue. 1950 SHORELINE - SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember loetten, to table this matter until the September 14, 1987 Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. BID AWARD - FAIRWAY MOWER* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to award the bid to Kromer Co. for Alternate Bid #2 for one used Long Tractor with Roseman Hydroijang Model 445 rairway Mower for an a-ount not to exceed $14,794.00. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE. REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBE.R 14, 1987 MAYOR'S REPORT CONTINUED -Regarding the previous issue brought up in Application 01176 regardinq the dedicated vs. traveled portion of Casco Puint Road. Councilmember Callahan recommended that this issue be cleared up with the affected property owners and possibly require hold harmless agreements. City Administrator Bernhardson stated he would follow-up on this issue and the cost involved. CADLL TV REPORT- 1988 CABLE TV COM14ISSION BUDGET RESOLUTION f2258 Councilmember Callahan stated that although the City has little control over the Cable TV franchise, wanted it noted that being pre, nted a budget to approve over which they have no authority to use the money was not sufficient information for public bodies to justify that substantial an increase. It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, that Council adopt Resolution "2258 qiving its approval to the 1988 Lake Minnetonka Cable Communication Commission budget. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. TRANSPORTATION REPORT There was no Transportation Report. CITY ADMIt.:STRATOR' S REPORT: HIGHWOOD ROAD STORM SEATER FEASIBILITY RESOLUTION #2259 City Administrator Bernhardson stated that a petition was received from residents in the Highwood Road area requesting a storm sewer to handle the drainage problem that particularly effects the Sauer and Baxter properties. Based on evidence submitted with the petition, staff recommends undertaking the necessary feasibility study for an approximate cost of $3,500.00 to determine if it is appropriate for a storm sewer project to be undertaken in the Highwood Road area. Glen Sauer, 4104 Highwood Road, and David Baxter, 4108 Highwood Road, were present for this matter. Mr. Sauer stated that the drainage problem has existed ever since the City sewer came through and destroyed the drainfield. Mr. Baxter confirmed that there is a problem and it should be fixed. Public Wort; Coordinator Gerhardson indicated that the destroyed line in question was a private line. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1987 IIIGH`WOOD ROAD STORM SEWER CONTINUED It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sine, to direct the City Engineer to perform a feasi►7ility study to determine the appropriate remedy to lii,iit the storm water runoff which causes a problem in the Highwood area. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 1988 BUDGET METING - SEPTEMBER 17, 1967 - 7:00 P.M. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Mayor Grabek, that the Council acknowledge September 17, 1987 at 7:00 P.M. as the date and time for the 1988 Budget meeting. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 1988 COUNCIL GOAL SETTING It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to establish October 7, 1987 at 7:00 P.M. as the special meeting of the Council's strategic planning process for 1988. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. MINNEHARA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT APPOINTMENTS It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, that the City Council direct staff to draft a letter of endorsement of the three candidates to the Hennepin County Board together with indicated the desirability of an ex officio position for a representative of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. JEFF ESSEN 2648 CASCO POINT ROAD BERM IN RIGHT-OF-WAY City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed the issue tabled at the Augu7t. 24, 1987 Council meeting pending a recommendation from the City Engineer regarding the safety of a double curb cut. He explained that in this particular case a review of the file indicated that the Public works Coordinator had reviewed and deleted the double curb cut with the plans giving no indication of an intended berm, however, the document with the deletion was not appropriately transmitted to the contractor which led Mr. Essen to believe that the double curb cut was approved. City Engineer Cook reviewed the plans and recommended approval of the double curb cut citing no safety concerns; and recommended that the berm be moved back to provide at least a 6 foot shoulder along Casco Point Road. Public works Coordinator Gerhardson stated that Mr. Essen cut back the brush which was a major obstruction and no longer felt there was a safety concern subject to moving the berm back as recommended. 141 I Report for Highwood Storm Sewer Improvements Orono, Minnesota File 111o. i 3933 "-I Bones t roo NEIN Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota AI j 1 Bones t roo �► is Rosene AnderIlk & Associates Engineers & Architects 1 Chd: 1, 11WIes„n, Pt Kt.lh A (, ., rY., •, It-- ., 1'e,•tVa. I. r a„ A I-Ksm, bert RoW Rntene. Pt RKhW I'nte, r• ard 'Ane^• • 1•,.• ,.. of 1.0 M "Aw PliKy Joseph Awe'" Pf DrVWdt Rurq.r.. '- I.,%'t IulranAll -r.,m Madho I A EemLen), r1 hr,,, A &eu,K w, I. M. � .., 1 . ' n.n rA , rvrlm RKha,d 1 lu,ner. PI Marl A plan,.., I-. Kedt MA'h A 'ryp lames C C4%on. PE fed K I,eld. PE M.al Y Glenn R Cook. PI LlwnAel : RA..1m.M.n. "I e1.pr s It , • thomi% E Noyes. PE Robert a rlelrene. r1 holm.% I •• .r "t Robert G $hunKhl- PF Davd O Iot4na. ', Iltryv.o ald A .wd..1, . Marwn t Solvala. PE February 23, 1988 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Highwood Storm Sever Improvement Project No. 87-4 Our File No. 13933 Dear Mayor and Council: NC�_@R OUR �r .1 MAR 2 31988 11 Transmitted herewith is the feasibility report :c;r rat! ; :st. • :,Iu sewer in the Highvood Lake Minnetonka Subdivision west ..f ^t,:.t.;y Raa 1 151 along County Road 19. The report provides a detailed .,)st estimate of t!:,: :,..� ! „�„F ,:1silterr.i end a plan of the area. We would be pleased to meet with the City Courtcil at �r ::s•ani ':/, tcl review the proposed project. Respectfully submitted, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK i ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:li I hereby certify that. this rt %.+ was prepared by me or under my direct sul.,,l v:: ', n ar.d that I am a duly Register.d Pr t, Engineer under the laws of the State t:., Mitt.., seta. Glenn R. Cook. P.E. Date: February 231, l9Fd Rpt i ;933 233S West Highway 36 Is St. Paul, Mlnnesota 5S113 Is 612 TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TABLE OF CONTENTS I"TRODUCTION DISCUSSION PROJECT COSTS AND ASSESSMENTS CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS APPENDIX - COST ESTIMATE DRAINAGE PLAN 2 Rpt13933 Page No. 1. 2. 3. 3. 4. J INTRODUCTION The City of Orono has requested this report to determine the feasibility of constructing storm sever in the Highwood Lake Minnetonka Subdivision. The existing storm sewer system does not provide adequate capacity for the drain- age area. The residents in the area experienced significant flooding during the July rain storms. Two alternates are provided to upgrade the storm sever system. Alternate I would provide for constructing the storm sewer down an existing alley east of Lot 11. Alternate II would provide for constructing the storm sewer along tho alignment of the existing pipe. The storm water runoff from Highwood Road drains to the lake between lots a causing erosion problems. Modification of the crown on Highwood Road and the placement of a berm curb is also proposed as a part of this project. DISCUSSION j The Highwood storm sewer drainage area is approximately 8.6 acres as shown j� on Figure 1. The park area north of County Road No. 19 drains to the north i across County Road No. 151. i� The drainage area is currently served by an inadequate storm sewer aye- tem. The outfall line consists of a conglomerate of pipe types and sizes put together as development occurred. The construction of a new storm sewer sys- tem is desirable to solve the current problem. - 3 - Rpt13933 Two alternates are provided for constructing the outfall line. Alternate One provides for following the existing alignment and Alternate Two provides for moving the outfall line west to an alley. The area where the outfall line is proposed for either alternate is congested. Construction will result in considerable disruption of existing driveways and yard areas. The ourfall line should be constructed as 21 inch reinforced concrete. The street modifications on Highland Road would consist of placing a var- iable thickness (1/20 to 30) bituminous surface with a berm curb to control the runoff. The storm water runoff would be directed northeast into the new storm sewer system. The proposed street modifications will raise the street grade. This could exacerbate some current grade problems betweer the street and the garages. PROJECT COST AND ASSESSMENT The project cost and assessment rates for the storm sewer improvement are outlined in this section wi-h a detailed cost estimate provided in the Appen- dix. The indicated prices are as projected for the 1988 construction season (ENR 4500). Estimated Project Cost Total Cost Cost/S.F. Cost/L.F. Alternate I $19,500 $0.07 --- Alternate II 25.000 0.10 --- Street Modifications 8,250 --- y 13.75 - 4 - Rpt13933 The project costs are proposed to be assessed to the benefiting property owners in the drainage area on a square foot basis. The street modifications are proposed to be assessed to the benefiting property owners along the stroc t on a front foot basis. The estimates do not include costs for temporary or permanent easements necessary to construct the proposed storm sever system. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The project as reviewed herein is feasible as it relates to general engineering principals and cotist_•. '.!on procedures. Based on !^',Drmation contained in this report, it is recommended that: 1. This report be adopted by the City of Orono as a guide f,., con- struction of the storm sever improvements in the Highwood area. 2. The City conduct a legal and fiscal review of the project prior to a public hearing. 3. A public hearing be held to determine further action to be tak- en. The property owners in the drainage area which are proposed to be assessed should be notified for hearing purposes. 4. The following schedule be followed if the project is to proceed: Receive Preliminary Report March 14. 1988 Hold Public Hearing April 11, 1988 Order Plans and Specifications April 11. 1988 Approve Plans and Specifications April 25. 1988 Receive Bids May 13, 1988 Award Contract May 23. 1988 Start Construction June 6, 1988 Complete Construction June 30. 1988 - S - Rp!:3933 APPENDIX COST ESTIMATES HIGHWOOD STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT ORONO, MINNESOTA STORM SEWER - ALTERNATE I 280 Lin.ft. 21' R.C.P. @ $30.00/lin.ft. $ 8,400.00 2 Each Catch basins @ $1,006.00/each 2,000.00 1 Ench 21" R.C.P. Apron @ $1,000.00/each 1,000.00 280 Lin.ft. Restoration @ $10.00/lin.ft. 2,800.00 Subtotal $14,200.00 10Z Contingency 1,400.00 Total Construction $15,600.00 251 Legal, Engineering, Admin. 3,900.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST ................................ $19,500.00 STORM SEWER - ALTERNATE II 390 Lin.ft. 211 R.C.P. @ $30.00/lin.ft. $11,700.00 2 Each Catch basins @ $1,000.00/each 2.000.00 1 Each 211 R.C.P. Apr(.as @ ^1.000.00/each 1,000.00 390 Lin.ft. Restoration @ $10.00/lin.ft. 3,900.00 Subtotal $18,600.00 10Z Contingency 1,860.00 Total Construction $20,460.00 25Z Legal, Engineering, Admin. 5,120.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST ................................ $25,580.00 STREET MODIFICATIONS 600 Lin.ft. Street Overly @ $8.00/lin.ft. $ 4,800.00 600 Lin.ft. Restoration @ $2.00/lin.ft. 1,200.00 Subtotal $ 6,000.00 10Z Contingency 600.00 Total Constructiun $ 6,600.00 25Z Legal, Engineering, Admin. 1,650.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST ................................ $ 8,250.00 - 6 - Rpt13933 LAKE MINNETONKA HIGHWOOD STORM SEWER PROJECT NO 87- 4 0 xiaIt' ng i S4rm S�w r Proposed Storm Sewer Street Construction HONESTR00, ROSDIE. ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers do Architects St. Paul. ►,ilnn•sota Dote' romm. 13933 EF'gure I Mom', t:u., 55Y4 _ April r, 198^, '11.11 : r' ' rrf '•�' q rbn'Ir tr •' i �nr} irn It hn5 nor'e to ry aLtontic,n tLat 2 rout..s are being cor,Fider,A for a store aewer to car•ry the fln- of grran,' water from the west side of Hifhwooe Roar' to Lake Yi.in,tonka. I Rr co"Ietel;; onposed to the proposer' route that follows the existing private stc - sealer Urv,u, h :.he Vorwries, NcCurcly aur' iheobalr= properties. I cannot allo••r ry nrooert'r to be torn un to renlace a story^ sewer that very aaenuately hanAleq the rrount' Rater runoff fro^ our three Drooerties. '4e nurchaser', install,A an-4 rave raint-iinerll our story se:•rer without City ronev or Resistance, but with their full knowleege. The eater t.ae only backne uo twice since it was installeO. The 1CO year floo,' water we ha,' in 1Q75 took about 3 'ays to run off. This was because a neirhborh00% yi' threw a larEre rock Aown one of the manholes any' it t1-c'r' "., flo- if vat oL. of the Sauer property. I ha,' to probe with :I !%rake and tYmn di,- doa+r. in.o the pine to remove the rock. Once i •�1s r•Ar "Vats, t%., wR t,r :•in off ir. a f,ar hours. ( Bill Sime owned the lon[►rie4 orongr'.•r RL that ti-e nnr' can attest to this.) gear flood '•ra`_Pr %,R }:Rr' in 1QP7 ran off in about 12 !.ours. 1r•cnr-linr to '•:eat',er Bur,a� n'.atistics tt i-. n-:nlnt of rein shnulc' not nrr•r.r •rcain my � :r lir-•.i•-ea. •'-,.r•_A thr-iurh m, (Z•c%r "•� nronerty Mow has, st.or- ane sAnitar;• se...►or cnA•,r it. With •-v ne:• 3 car Farape and blacktop driveway that I bui1L alnnt* `,hia route in 1997 there is no roo to do the excavation necessary to inst.a'' a larrPr ate !^ seu:er nine. it qn extension of our stor- sewer rrust be built west of highwood Roads I woulcc be in favor of the route to the south through the fire lane (public Recess) west of the Vonpries property. This route for a storm sewer does not involve our privAte stor•••• se•:rer or ry property ane therefore I will not help pay for it. Sincerely ,yours, COAL iA- V Dal, . FcCurrly coovt Bill Si-e Robert D. Metcalf Maurice U. 1_azarus Ms. Dorothy City Clerk, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Metcalf & Lazarus m1forneys of Law 700 Title Insurance Building 400 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 332.1417 Hallin Orono MN 55323 April 1, 1988 Re: Dr, and Mrs. A'.exander Vo,.,ries 4051 Highwood Road, Orono, MN Storm Sewer Study, Proposed 88-1 Dear M:, Hall: n: Of Counsel to: Peterson, Engberg & Peterson D,. and Mrs. Vongries were just leaving the country last week when they called regarding the Storm Sewer Study. As tl-e:r counsel, they have asked that I follow up on cer- tain if their concerns and interests in the proposed Project during their absence. They will be out of the country until the middle of May. I gave requested of Mr. Gerhardson a copy of the Feasibility Study and related documentation of the Project Study. He informed me that he understood the first public hearing was set' for April 25. Of necessity, Dr, and Mrs. Vongries will be unable to attend that hearing. May the matter be continued for first public hearing to a time in May, after their return? May the record of the first public hearing be continued as an open record until May when Dr. and Mrs. Vonqries may respond? I would arpreciate your call con.er.iently after receipt of my note so I rt:ay learn your thoughts and suggestions. Very truly yours, Maurice U. Lazarus MUL:mar U - u 1987 PARK N Scole 1% 200' D►oinoge 8oundory � c z 0 a cr r Rpq� r z 1710 LAKE MINNETONKA HIGHWOOD STORM SEWER PROJECT N0. 87 - 4 -�x� finq St1m S if) UF-R FLu�a' '11-� / [-- — Proposed Storm . Sewer Street Construction 90NESTROO, 9 'XNE. ANDERUK h ASSUCIATES. INC. Engineery k Architects St. Paul, Mlnnesctc Oote: Comm. 13933 Figufe I J T o A;!: - I Project Name iW rl Date % a /AS Project No - Resolution No. 'r S Resolution Dale Municipal Code No. Prepared By _ Levy No. - -Sheet of Interest ►tale P.I.D. No. Plat per cal Lot stock Addition Ares Feet Units Ass. Rate Total Ass. Name Address Miscellaneous ,?to ._ 4166 Hig hwcod r 4150 Hig hvKod _ 4148 High z .ntj 4140 HighwKod •, _ 4132 HiQ r Z3 ��� r7; ,,,, •. 14116 Hig `::c,• 4108 Ht r: Ig,�n, 4104 Highwod - n 4116 Hig hvxod 7_ 4109 North Shore Dr L , 7-1 _ „-, •= 4150 Hi Od y 3115 North Shore Dr Y c , ., 14 ._ 7n,) 4196 North Shore Dr * Indicates more than mane P.I.D. Project No. , X; -� Resolution No. —9/4-^r , i Project Name _ %� • j^ �,- ^1^ - , _ Date - Resolution Da'd Municipal Code No. Levy No. Prenared By Sheet of. P.I.D. No. Plat Parcel Lot Block Adchtion Area Feet Units Ass. Rate Total Ass. Name -- Address Miscellaneous �,7-2� _7 _yy_c? tnlln: MOD 140 North Shore Dr 701 = Orono Orono ,. Orono c� Orono 57 Orono Orono `9 , , c� , ,•= Orono 74 to ^�� -),� .: Orono * Indicates more th;: :i vne P.I.D. Project No. T• - Project Name -;-, � - +-d -f' r+ "•, Date '//i4 /t= Resolution No. — -^1 `� Resolution Date Interest Rate Municipal Code No. _ Prer ared By Jn^ Levy No. P.I.D. No. Plat Parcel Lot Block Addition Area -"T Feet Units Ass. Rate Total Ass. Name Address Miscellaneous 117 zs -7 , 3'r r3-I _ 4075 HighwCDd s, .27 e 4079 Highwod 4091 High or: 4099 Fiiq 4101 H igh u1 4105 Hi 4109 H ighw od S-, 4125 H ighw od - -, 4149 Hiqh 4156 H i gh%-x --r— — Orono * Indicates more than one P.I.D. F HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT Notice It heresy given dial the City Council of the City of Orono will meat In the Coudhcil Chambers. 1275 Brown Road South at 7 00 p.m. on April 25. 1W. to consider the can- shuctlon of storm sewer improvements orh High - wood Road in the Hlghwood Lake Minnetonka sub@vh w putowl to Section 429 01 1 to 429.111. The M(Ynjed Cosh 01 such improwrflent is M foi0vre: Alle"Wis 1 $19.600 Allot a M 26.000 Street Modifications 6.250 Such person ore deem to be heat with refer- ence to the pr000esd Ww vernent will be heard M this meath . Dated AM 14, ION Dorothy M. Mallon city Clark bllslhed h tfe Laker and Plonae• April 11 and Affidavit of Publication State of Minnesota. County of Hennepin. Bill Holm, being duly sworn, on oath says that he is an authorized agent ano c?mplovee of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER. ti.ound. Min- nesota, and has full knowledge of the facts wt.!rh are stated below. A ) The newspaper has complied with all the require- ments constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02. 331 A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. 2 B ) The printed �''M'GL�rC/f/ �1i`�%t► which is attached was cut froin the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week for _ Z . successive weeks It was first published Monday, the day of / 19 and was thereafter printed and published every Monday, to and including �f Monday. the day of . !.�! . 19 Se �' q 4&� - Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to me on this f day of yam' 19 1� By Notary Public Rate Information OIL A rate paid by commercial users for compara b-, d4 puf inch (2) Maximum rile allowed by law for above molter $4 54 per inch (3) Rate actually charged fnr above matter S4 54 per inch Each additional successive week $3 03 per -rich MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL,'ll',2 �.�f�l � r%K ATTENDANCE 7:01 P.M. t�f The Council met on the above date with the fol owing members present: Mayor Grabek, Councilmembers Peterson, Goetten, and Callahan. Councilmember Sime was absent. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, Public Works Director Gerhardson, Police Chief Kilbo, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder Peterson. City Attorney Barrett and City Engineer Cook were also present. CONSENT AGENDA* Mayor Grabek welcomed to the meeting Webelos Troop #297 from Mound. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to approve the Consent Agenda* subject to removal of the following items: #9 -#1253 B. John Lindahl, 1406 Bohns Point Road - requested by City Administrator Bernhardson M20-Ordinance Amendment -Dangerous Weapons and Articles - requested by Councilmember Peterson 822-Schlee Builders -Settlement of Assessment - requested by Councilmember Goetten #25-Temporary Employment -Golf Course - requested by City Administrator Bernhardson #29-City Administrator's Report -Comprehensive Plan Amendment - requested by City Administrator Bernhardson Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. ABSOLUTION OF APPRECIATION - PAUL TAYLOR RESOLUTION #2405 It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by cilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2405 in RL nition of Paul A. Taylor's Volunteer Service on the City of Orono's Park and Planning Commissicn from Janaury 5, 1983 to February 29, 1988. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. Mayor Grabek read and presented the Resolution of Appreciation to Mr. Paul A. Taylor. APPROVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to approve the Minutes of the March 28, 1988 Council meeting as submitted. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Planning Commissioner Jeffrey Johnson was present and had no comments at this time. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 11, 1988 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments from the public. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: #1201 M. HILBELINK/J. VOGT* 320 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD FINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #2406 It was moved Councilmember Approving the Ayes 4, Nays 0. #120). M.HILBRLINIC/J. VOGT ROAD NAME RBQUBST by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Callahan, to adopt Resolution #2406 Plat of Meyer Dairy Addition. Motion, John Vogt was present for this matter and was agreeable to staff's recommendation. It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to approve the road names of "Silver View Drive" and "Silver Meadow Drive" for Meyer Dairy Addition per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. #1223 JOHN B. WALDRON 1951 CONCORDIA STREET CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION #2407 City Administrator Bernhardson explained the drafted resolution which reflects Council action to date, denying the creation of a walkout cut anO a 3' terracing excavation, but approving lakeshore restoration with a 3' retaining wall at the upper end if the bank, and which approves the proposed deck in conjunction with concurrent removal of the existinS hardcover, resulting in no hardcover increase The resolution also conditions the ar-- ,a .,n removal of the roof runoff drain tile, ana advises applicant to work with staff in finding an acceptable solution. Assistant 'Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that Mr. Waldron would not be present at this meeting, but has indicated concern with the lack of a solution to the roof runoff incorporated in the proposed resolution. Staff has drafted the resolution as a comprehensive direction reflecting Council action. City Administrator understanding that approach Staff with problem. Bernhardson stated it was staff's the burden was on the applicant to other solutions to the roof runoff MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 11, 1988 #1223 WALDRON CONTINUED It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2407 granting variances and a conditional use permit to John and Lynn Waldron, 1951 Concordia Stree, for construction of a deck and retaining wall in conjunction with grading to restore the lakeshore bank per the method found to be appropriate by the City Council. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. #1213 ROLLIN LACY* 2655 NORTH SHORE DRIVE AMENDMENT TO RESOLUTION #2295 RESOLUTION 62408 It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to adopt Resolution #2408 approving an amendment of Orono Resolution #2295 that would amend the hardcover variance for Rollin Lacy of 2655 North Shore Drive. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. #1258 JOHN EHLERT 1785 CONCORDIA STREET VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2409 City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a conditional use permit and variances to construct an attached garage and addition to the existing house. Planning Commission recommended approval of the variances and conditional use permit for the house addition, but recommended denial of the side setback variance for the attached garage, of which staff has drafted a resolution reflecting this recommendation. John Ehlert was present for this matter and stated no objection to Planning Commission and staff recommendation. Councilmember Goetten noted that the site plan submitted was incomplete in that it did not include all existing hardcover on the property necessary for an accurate review of the application, however, she did not have a problem with approval per Planning Commission's recommendation. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2409 as presented. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 3 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 11, 1988 #1253 B. JOHN LINDAHL 1406 BOHNS POINT ROAD VARIANCE REQUEST FOR REVISION BASED ON INCORRECT SITE PLAN City Administrator Bernhardson explained that Council previously approved a variance to allow construction of a garage 18' from the lot line. However, during the final stages of preparation for the building permit application, applicant realized that the site plan was incorrect and is now requesting reconsideration of a variance to allow construction of the garage 14' from the lot line. Council's options are 1) review the corrected information and approve the 14' setback, or 2) refer the matter back to the Planning Commission for review. Mr. Lindahl was present and reviewed the details of the incorrect vs. the correct site plan. Fie noted that an additional delay would cost him a $1,000 reduction he was offered by his contractor for starting the job at this time. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated in viewing the site he felt that the corrected location of the garage was similar to what was actually proposed and tL _ fore not a significant change. Planning Commissioner Johnson stated he personally would have no problem with Council approving the request without referring it back to the Planning Commission. However, other members of the Planning Commission might expect it to be referred back and it was his opinion that the request would ultimately result in a split vote by the Planning Commission. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve the variance adjustment as requested. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. ENGINEER'S REPORT: WOODHILL ROAD PLANS AND SPECS RESOLUTION City Administrator Bernhardson submitted to Council for review and approval the specifications for the upgrading of Woodhi 11 Road east of Orono Orchard Road. Additionally, it is recommended that the assessment public hearing date be sct for May 23, 1988. City Engineer Cook reviewed the plans and specifications for the Council. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 11, 1988 WOODHILL ROAD PLANS AND SPECS CONTINUED It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmeriber Callahan, to approve the Plans and Specifications for Woodhill Road and authorize the City Engineer to advertise for the bids with a bid opening on April 29, 1988 and to designate May 2_;, 1988 at 7:00 P.M. as the assessment hearing and bid award date. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 2. Councilmembers Goetten and Peterson voted nay on the basis that they were both opposed to the ?roject originally. Motion tied. It was moved by Councilmember Peterson, seconded by Mayor Grabek, to table this matter pending attendance by the full Council. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. MAYOR'S REPORT: WEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES REPORT City Administrator Bernhardson introduced LaDean McWilliams and Bruce Larson of the West Hennepin Hurran Services Planning Board. He noted that Sue Morrison has submitted her resignation as an Orono representative on this Board effective this day because she is moving from the City. LaDean McWilliams stated that their biggest problem is the energy assistance program which has been reduced 20% this year by Federal cuts and they anticipate a State cut next year. As a result, their staff has also been cut, however, they have had many volunteers to assist them. Ms. McWilliams noted that she will be worki-g part-time with the medical assistance program. Other points of interest noted were a telephone bill assistance program to seniors citizens and various daycare subsidies from the cities. Bruce Larson explained the status of the C.A.S.H. (Community Action Suburban Hennepin) program. Mayor Grabek commended Ms. McWilliams and Mr. Larson for the many people they help. Mr. Larson extended an invitation to the Council to attend their Annual meeting on the evening of May 3, 1988. (They will be receiving an invitation in the mail.) 5 MINUTES OP THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 11, 1988 CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: MOBILE PEDDLERS City Administrator Bernhardson explained the issue of ordinance interpretation in relation to mobile peddlers, zoning information regarding the Paul Larson property, and the issuance of the solicitation permit to Mr. Penke. Staff recommends the following: 1. Appropriate ordinance modification be undertaken to be presented to the Council at the April 25th meeting. 2. That the property owner undertake the appropriate rezoning. 3. only require a permit if the ordinance io- amended to so govern but ensure he has a County license. 4. If no rezoning undertaken by June 15, 1988, not permit further sales on residential property. Councilmember Goetten asked if Mr. Penke would be entitled to a refund from past paid solicitor's licenses? City Administrator Bernhardson stated that was a question staff has not yet addressed. It was moved by Mayor grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, that the Council direct staff to invesitgate the zoning and ordinance situation and allow the situation as it exists for this year. Motion, Ayes 4, Mays 0. DRIVEWAY EASEMENT - PHEASANT ROAD City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a driveway easement over City property from 2673 6 2655 Pheasant Road and 2615 Shadywood Road. In reviewing the request, staff found that 2655 Pheasant Road has direct driveway access onto Pheajant Road, therefore staff recommends tabling consideration of access over City property for this particular property. The residence at 2615 Shadywood Road has access from Shadywood Road, therefore staff recommends denying vehicle access over City property in this case. Staff's intent is not to close off the access to these properties, merely not grant legal access. Staff recommends approving vehicle access over City property to serve as the primary access to 2673 Pheasant Road. 6 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 11, 1988 DRIVEWAY BASEMENT CONTINUED D.C. Messer, 2613 Pheasant Road, stated he has owned the property for 22 years and was erroneously told that he owned property and he has made improvements under the assumptici, that he owned the property. He felt the easiest solution would be to grant an easement to all three properties. He noted that he would like this issue resolved as soon as possible because he intends to put his property on the market for sale. Attorney Richard Indritz, representing Mr. Huber of 2615 Shadywood Road, explained x-he desire for an alternate access because of the difficult access onto Shadywood Road. It was noted that it is the property owners desire to utilize both accesses. Mr. Indritz stated that their request is to legally approve an access situation that has existed for many years. Mr. Messer noted that the new owner of 2655 Pheasant Road, Joseph Forrer, needed access to his back half -lot through the requested City easement. Mr. Indritz stated that if the City is denying a legal easement for 2615 Shadywood but not prohibiting the use of the access, he would like the right to use the access in writing. He felt there was no ocher purpose for this property and suggested that the City sell the property to the 3 property owners subject to them granting the City a utility easement. Mr. Messer stated it would be simpler if the City vacate the property and divide between the three property owners for them to maintain. After discussion, it was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to table this matter for further review by staff regarding the possibility of selling the property. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. TODD WATERS - STORM SEMER PETITION City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed the issue of determinir.y whether the Council desires a 358 participation before ordering a feasibility study in this matter. He explaine: that according to the statutory requirements �f City undertakes the feasibility study without the 358 petition it will require a 4/5's vo*e at the time it decides to actually order the improven:er.t be undertaken should it choose to order it done. Staff recommends accepting the petition and order the feasibility study provided the property owner is wi 1ling to pay 508 of the cost of the feasibility study (total cost of study $1,500) should the City decide not to go ahead with the project. 7 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 11, 1996 TODD WATERS CONTINUED Todd Waters of 3061 Casco Point Road, and John Dennis of 3055 Casco Point Road were present f(.- this matter. Mr. Waters stated that the study will prove that hardcover has contributed to the drainage problem and would like the Council to undertake the study. Mr. Dennis stated he felt the rules have constantly been changing throughout the entire Waters/drainage issue. City Engineer Cook stated that the $1,500 feasibility study cost did not include recording the history of the drainage problem causes, it merely covers the cost to assess the problem and the solution. Mr. Waters noted the two main issues: 1) a feasiblity study to support the drainage problem and 2 ) who will share in the responsibility of fixing the problem. He also noted that according to his attorney, if the City denies the request to undertake the study and his property suffers damage from the drainage, the City will be liable. City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed the process of options involved in the feasibility study. Mr. Dennis stated that he has lost many mature trees within the last five years because of the water ponding problem. He stated he feels like his property is being dumped on. Mr. Waters stated he is anxious to proceed with the feasibility study so as not to lose the summer months. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by iouncilmember Callahan, that the Council accept the petition as currently submitted and order the Engineer to undertake the appropriate feasibility study for this matter if the two owners petition agree to 50% of the feasibility study cost if the project does not go forward. Motion, Ayes 1, Nays 0. CITY FACILITIES STUDY City Administrator Bernhardson updated the Council regarding the status of facilities study and recommended presentation of the review process of the site evaluation to +-he Planning Commission. 0 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 11, 1988 FACILITIES STUDY CONTINUED It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, that the Council accept the information regarding the progress of the site evaluation together with adok, ig a process for development of the criteria for the site and specific commentaries on the sites currently being analyzed. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 1. Councilmember Callahan voted nay. Motion carried. SIREN INSTALLATION - MINNETONKA BEACH City Administrator explained that Minnet• ka Beach is considering installing an emergency preparedness siren in their jurisdiction. Police Chief Kilbo, Emergency Preparedness Director, has developed a master siren plan for the four communities served by the Orono Police Dept. and has indicated that installing a larger size siren in Minnetonka Beach would also benefit certain parts of Orono not currenty covereJ, particularly Big Island. Staff recommends the City of Orono participate in the cost for the difference of installing the larger siren. Additionally, it is recommended that the City offer to finance the Minnetonka Beach portion at a reasonable interest rate in equal payments over a period not to exceed five years. Councilmember Callahan was opposed to the City of Orono going into the financing business regarding it as a dereliction of duty. City Administrator Ber.nhardson stated in this case the loan would probably be about 2 "ears at a 7-7.5% interest rate which is the current rate for investments received by the City. He noted that Minnetonka Beach has not requested financial assistai.ce at this point, and the purpose of the offer would be aiding them as a good neighbor and possibly allowing the installation of the siren this year rather than the following year. He noted that there is no legal problem with this precedure. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, that the Council offer to pay up to $3,200 for the installation of a 125 decibel siren in Minnetonka beach and that Council consider an appropriate loan at a reasonable interest rate to Minnetonka Beach if they make such a request for financing. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 1. Councilmember Callahan voted nay opposing consideration of a loan to Minnetonka Beach. Motion carried. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MHETING HELD APRIL 11, 1988 LAKE MINNETONKA LAKE LEVEL City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request from Art Finkelstein, 1720 Shadywood Road, for Council to support him in his effort to obtain information regarding the lake level from the appropriate agencies. Mr. Finkelstein was present for this matter and stated he was generally concerned about obtaining accurate information regarding the lake level. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to support Mr. Finkelstein's efforts by forwarding a letter to the Minneheha Creek Watershed District and Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and c,pp(.int him as a liaison to the City of Orono, and requesting him to report back to the Council regarding his findings. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. OPTIONS RBGARDING LAND USE REVIEWS City Administratrator Bernhardson presented the issue of options relatir. to ways that the City may desire to undertake as it .3tes to its land use controls, and the means by wh: .t reviews thosr.. Councilmember Goetten did not feel a Board of Appeals was necessary because of the existing Planning Commission, but she expressed the need for a 5 member commission to deal specifically with zoning amendments and marina operations, which would take the burden off the Planning Commission's long agendas. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the Planning Commission and Board of Appeals would be focused upon different types of agendas. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to submit this issue to the Planning Commission for their recommendatioi— Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 1987 POLICE ACTIV:'!"Y REPORT City Administrator Bernhardson presented information regarding Police operations and contracts for 198'%. Police Chief Kilbo stated he hopes to submit the 1987 statistical data at Council's next meeting. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Mayor Grabek, that thi Council accept the information regarding the police department contract operations for 1987 together with approving the contracts for the Cities of Spring Park, Long Lake, a -d Minnetonka Beach to be used in reducing those cor.-.murjities 198R payments. Motion, Ay:s 4, Nays 0. 10 OF TH8 R&�ULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 11, 1988 ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - DANGEROUS WEAPONS AND ARTICLES ORDINANCE NO. 48, SECOND SERIES Councilmember Peterson requested clarification of the term "air gun" and questioned why sling shots were not included in this ordinance amendment. Police Chief Kilbo clarified the term of "air gun" to include any air propellent device. He noted that sling shots are controlled under other statutes. It was moved by Councilmember Peterson, seconded by Mayor Grabek, that Council adopt Ordinance No. 48, Second Series as an amendment to Ordinance No. 9.10. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. BOARD OF REVIEW - WEDNESDAY, APRIL 27, 1988* It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to acknowledge April 27, 1988 at 7:00 P.M. as the Board of Review date. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 9. SCHLEE BUILDERS - SETTLEMENT OF ASSESSMENT City Adm4nistrator Ber•,hardson clarified a con,.ern by Councilmember Goetten regar-ling any interest owe It was moved by Councilmembei Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, that the Council authorize the refund of $4,867.00 to the First Bank National Association upon the payment of the outstanding specials on the Bayshire development (outstan(ling specials included all interest, penalties and pena It ; ,.nterest outstanding.) Motion. Ayes 4, Nays 0. WATER RATE REVISION - LONG LAKE -* ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ORDINANCE y0. 49, SECOND SERIES Tt was moved by Councilmember raetten, seconded by Cuunci'^i,-a:ber Callahan, to adopt Ordinance No. 49, econd Serves ,oi -n lircj Ordinance No. 44, Second Series, to adjust. Pi --, ♦", Lonq Lake, water rates from $2.50 to $2.75 I,c 1C"C gallo,js e'fective for the second quarter billing, to be pub:.b.,c, + April 18, 1988. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. METRO WASTE - ENGINEERING SERVICX* It was moved by Councilmember -)eaten, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, that the city retain Bonestroo for the inspection work on the Metro Waste project on its behalf. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 11 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 11, 1988 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT - GOLF COURSE City Administrator Bernhardson requested to add Betty Stevens to the list of temporary employees at the Golf Course. Ms. Stevens has been a past employee at the Golf Course. Councilmember Peterson asked if the number of employees has increased over last year and asked about the difference in hourly pay rates? Public Works Director Gerhardson stated the number of employees is the same as last year, and the higher hourly rate is based on previous experience working at the golf course. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve employing the following persons at the golf course: Doug Erickson Temp. Counter Helper @ $5.25/hr Betty Stevens Temp. Counter Helper @ $5.00/hr John Ross Temp. counter Helper @ $4.50/hr Walter Mills Temp. Counter Helper @ $4.50/hr Steve Baylor Temp. Counter Helper @ $4.25/hr Livid Lundstrcm Temp. Counter Helper @ $4.25/hr Dan Oas Greenskeeper-Helper @ $4.75/hr Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. ADDITIONAL DEPOSITORY* RESOLUTION #2410 It wps moved by Councilmer*,er Goetten, seconded by Coii:jcilmember Callahan, to adopt Resolution #2410 making =.dditional depository appointments for 1988. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. TERMINATION OF PROBATIONARY STATUS* It wF,s moved by Council ^giber Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, oe Council not revise or modify the Administrator's determination in this matter. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. ADMINISTRATOR'S GOAL SETTING* It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to acknowledge the memo regarding Administrator's Goal Setting 1988-89 and defer further discussion on this matter until the April 25, 1988 Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 12 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 11, 1988 ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION Regarding the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, City Administrator Bernhardson noted that due the land demand versus the urban service issue the Metro Council is asking for a 30 day extenstion to finalize the process. It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to authorize a 30 day extension in this matter. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to accept City Administrator Bernhardson's information regarding: LMCD/Metro Council Review, County Road 116, Willow/Highway 12 Warning Flasher, Marina Licensing, County Road 15 Construction, City/School Intervention, ^lanning Interviews, and Goal Setting. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: City Attorney Barrett reported that the Popham Haik law firm has been approached to assist. in the transfer of sale of Dowden Cable Systems which serves Orono and surrounding communities. Popham Haik asks that the Council authorize a waiver if the matter comes to litigation. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to authorize the waiver as requested. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. LICENSES* It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to approve the following license: Special Events Permit - Americz•n Youth Hostels Ironman Ride Bicycle Ride through Orono Sunday, April 24, 1988 Approx. 7:30-11:00 A.M. HILLS* Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to approve payment of the All Fund Accounts. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. EXECUTIVE SESSION 9:12 P.M. City Administrator Bernhardson requested the Council enter into Executive Session at this time. 13 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 11, 1988 ADJOURNMENT 9:20 P.M. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Mayor Grabek, to adjourn the regular Council meeting at 9:20 P.M. Motion, .'dyes 4, Nays 0. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor 14 _ /r'C �'��-�f ►'� April �5, 1987 Cou>7Cr'1 �- q-as- 38 Mit. MAYOR, LADIES AND GI•.TI'TLEMEN : I AM HERE `1'ONIGH'T, AND I MUST SAY SADLY 30, TO REMIND YOU, THE ELECTED OFFICIALS, MEMBERS OF THE CI`1'Y STAFF, Aldi) TIE CITY ATTORNEY, FOR INADVERTENTLY DENYING THE PUBLIC ITS ABILITY TO KNOW INFORMA`1'ION WHICH HAS BEEN SEQUESTERED IN THESE CHAMBERS, UNDER YOUR BROAD INTEItPRI- TATION OF THE USE OF EXECU`1'IVE SESSION. I REFER TONIGHT, SPECIFICALLY, TO THE PENDING ISSUE OF THE DISCUSSION TO ANNEX TILE CITY OF LONG LAKE INTO THE CITY OF ORONO. I WOULD NOT BE HERE TONIGHT IF THIS ISSUE HAD ARISEN IN THE NORMAL ARENA OF PUBLIC DEBATE; BUT TO HAVE EXPENDED PUBLIC FUNDS, INADVERTENTLY AS IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN, VIOLATES THE MINNESOTA OPEN MEETING LAWS PROVISION OF EXCEPTION. THE DISCUSSION OF THE ISSUE OF ANNEXATION ALONE, RAIS'.S WESTION OF ► HY IT MUST BE KEPT SECRET FROM THE PUBLIC. PERHAP- IT TAKES A PRIVATE CITIZEN SUCH AS MYSELF To REMIND YOU OI'' MINNESO'TA STATUTE 471.705, ALSO KNOWN AS TH "MINNESOTA OPEN MEETING LAW." SUBDIVISION 1. 0:,' THIS STATUTE STATES THAT: "Except as otherwise expressly provided by statute, all meetings, including executive sessions, 6f any state agency, board, commission of department when required or permitted by law to transact public business in a meeting, and the governing - body of any sch,;ol district however organized, unorganized territory, county, city, town, or other public body, and of any committees sub connittee, board, department or commission thereof, shall be open to the public, except meetings of the board of parduns and tho commissioner of corrections. The votes of the members of such state agency, board, commission or department or of such governing body, com.-iittge, sub committee, board, department or commission or any action taken in a meeting; herein required t be open to the public shall be recorded in a journal kept for that purpose, Nhich journal shall be open to the public during all normal business hours where such records are kept. Tim vote of each member shall be recorded on each appropriation of money, except for payments of judgements, claims and amounts fixed by statute. This sec- t'on shall not apply to any state agency, board, or commission when exerctaing quasijudicial functions invomving diciblinary proceedings." *MURE 4 -3 - SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS THAT ARE TO BE DISCUSSED I14 EXECUTIVE SESSION ALONG WITH THE SPECIFIC MINNE30TA STATUTE THAT YOU ARE USING TO "clearly preserve the integrity and applicability of the attorney - client privilege." IF SUCH SPECIFIC STATUTES CANNOT BE FOUND, THAN ALL SUCH ITEMS 14UST BE PLACED INTO DISCUSSION IN OPEN PUBLIC FORU1A. PAR. MAYOR, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION AND YOUR TIME THIS EVENING. Gary M. Printup . } . -2- SUBDIVISION 2. "Any person who violates subdivision 1 shall be sub- ject to personal liability in the form of a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed $100 for a single occurrence. ..... Upon a third violation by the same person connected with the smae governing body, such person shall forfeit an5t further right to serve on such governing body or in any other capacity with such public body fvr a period of time equal to the terin of office such person was then serving. ...9.911 TH" SUPREME COi1RT OF MINNESOTA, ON SEPTEMBER 17, 1976, DSTEH- MINED THAT THE MINNESOTA OPEN MEETING LAW IS NOT INCONSIBTE14T 'WITH THE ATTORNEY -CLIENT PRIVILEGE AIJu THE TWO CONCEPTS ARE CAPABLE OF COMPATIBLE AND CONCURRENT OPERATION, ASSUMING THAT THE PUBLIC OFFICIERS AND ATTORNEYS DO NOT ABUSE THEIR TRUST BY EXT1:NDING THE PRIVILEGE AS A MERE CONDUIT TO SUPPRESS PUBLIC OBSERVATION OF THE DECI&ION MAKING PROCESS. THL; ATTORNEY -CLIENT EXCEPTION TO MINNESOTA OPEN iri ZI'ING LAW WILL ALMOST NEVER EXTR14D TO MERE REQUEST FOR GENERAL LEGAL ADVICE OIi OPINION BY PUBLIC BODY IN I'TS CAPACITY 1S PU1LID AGENCY. IN FACT, JUSTICE SCOTT .�TATED THAT "Public hoard members, sworn to uphold the law, may not e.rbitrarily or unnecessarily inflato confidentiality for the purpose of derlating the spread of the p blic meeting law. Neither the attorney's presence nor the Pppenstance of some kind of lawsuit may serve as the pretext for secret consultations whose revelation will not injure the public interest. To attempt a generalization embracing the occasions for genuine confidentiality wouaLd be rash. ...•. IN LIGHT OF THE PARAMETERS SET FORTH IN THE 14I:4NESOTA OPEN MEETING LAW, I IN:>IST AND DEMAND THAT YOU IMMEDIATELY DISCLOSE ALL INI'ORMATION TO THE PUBLIC REGARDING YOUR DISCUSSIONS, IBOTES, AND AUTHOdIZA'I'ION OP EXPENDITURES ,.F PUBLIC FUNDS FOH THE INVESTIGATION OF ANNEXING T:IE CUM;AUNITY OF' LONG LAKE INTO THE CITY OF ORONO, AND HERETO FORWARD, PROVIDE THE PUBLIC dITH STATUTORY ADVANCE NOTICE OF *bi0 RE* C P L 1 1 To: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members APQ 2 7 Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members UII i OF City Administrator Bernhardson From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: April 20, 1988 Subject: #1169 Wear Enterprizes Partnership, 2950 Watertown Road - Final Subdivision - Resolution The applicant has fulfilled all conditions of Resolution #2291 that approved the preliminary 6 lot plat. Staff recommends approval of the plat, Rolling Meadows Second Addition, subject to the findings and conditions set forth in the enclosed staff resolution. Mr. Michaels, applicant's attorney, has certain reservations concerning the wording within the road and utility easement. Please refer to his letter of February 18, 1988 to Tom Barrett. As staff advised Tom Barrett in an earlier conversation, the document has been used for approximately 15 years by the City at the time private roads were being created by the City. This easement gives the City the right to maintain utility easements within these private roads and most important, allows the City to go in and maintain a road for safety purposes if roads are not maintained by the property owners served by said private road. it is also staff's understanding that it is this same document that can be used when the City wishes to acquire said private road at some future time for public road purposes and maintainance of same. The city attorney has been made aware that Mr. Michaels will be seeking an explanation from the City. ROLLING MEADOWS 2ND ADDITION �•..lr lr rw cae r+.rru%.I ft Gw♦♦S.l al•it,■:! yrartr[-- ti It _,' 41iA1 - we S¢ Mq'?tl7 .. r oEmar — t s� M ll.l. .r .r•lY.• Y•�•t• ar. a•w. u Y Y...a + r..r r .l.a•. rtY• rrr.lY lr. rrr..r rleulr tr llr.. •.. n rrr . ..au .r rJel.aY •ar+ tlr• •. •rr r ar r+— - 2 Cil �• c o� � w~ WATE Mom• • ■YCi. .. -- c:C?� � •.r y.J r r w.a r.ISia� -- 3 ma -AM" s� 'may% m ' I t � - s q 0 1 DWN ROAD • � J b}L•i /rJar r��r •'� E• > ADD Y, . D.n.a.. Ir.w w.■M r w•AAJMO• •JODWX Afl ASSUM&D 100 O l00 :00 SCAll •a FEET ..• C.R. e rt � w r� a•�ra•� r..a rr c...-►•.. .r.r....-..� parr■, .r r J•aw l.ar r ar r.+l•..... ....+ur �..,ar.• K w. �T r arrt. wr r =r+•. a •.l . wr rm1 JJ.r •rY ,•, ■�•. �+,,•+o.Yc u. r.�sn.r�rr++ ran.. •r a.rr u, rwr•u r ar.■• w r r r.. •=.r Jra ar. •.w �r f. rr r r rrti r .arc r olss rorw a .wow � M. au�•f � r �...�.� i.Ki � Wes. rKi..: r+..� u..Yr Y .lap.. r+rl Yt rr =•colt a'•rarrr• . wr..l Y/•rrll r. rrr c•.Y n+K• a• r rY.a w u• rcrsr ra+• al __ Y. r ro_ Jr.R a •swurf• Doan+ s a .w+. rrt.lJ laa 1 rr rr..pJ r �r .. Itar r..r Y cn,. r+•l r e.ss rs s cans. u.a .tr K • Y.ra . �•.+�. r rt rr...: a•+ .tt .le.+r r rYacar rr r rr µ+ p�•.�r.�.: Puri s ..last. r�r+nr+.r ..ro.c�.rt't ri�w.� r arra l•.a. «. r .wli Y r •l..asr Y rt .t•l . 1. ,.,,. v .t.mr• t+. rr.Yl.. s..a.�.•l r .a.rs..•r .•aw r l.K __ M r K err �■, wrrlf 1r .a.c r wt1.1i afl■■f s .rnss � w� r r.�r A Y. 6• r !i•le•/ r tr !•b r `�. s..�r r ...•lr re••• arYt W f.. w�.rra•ww •�Yas r t.�r•.ar r ar •■r. pwra 4•r aw rw ply A rs tl4 r � pram f •► prr r .trr car+ .+ta r .l.r..sr r ..�rl•r. r •w...r A =rrt• w.•rY. aralr t•"4. J.Y !. •l�r a►r ~' par a■lam =morn r r Joa+c s rrfrr. rowa• a a■.� rnlJ► ep �. a..rr L.r YK r.. �• •. rrr �f ®a a sir ..-, roc. rwm w.m!!w. �s mw•. �r Jrs+.= r mwr n.. =ter r lw■, ar• J••a r ar...w� rr�rJr awe. rmmew arar. raw iY .—ON •rrr`O••�i.flr �!Y• ow r SLiam 49 �� i.•�.rr w, rr.r cKa •. ar ua. ®ar ® �O� ROLLING MEADOWS 2ND ADDITION 7 r --.N---- Piero War(rtaltet✓Sa•.Sr.tb Utility •r-0 ec•IMM r•r•a4 t•eee Wei f• � • I •e Mtly Y twt i r,e[n, un l••t otMr.i•• 1m,e•aw. •ttan•eYo,n, oa lox 11r.. .m tD /r. i riexn •tw •eloan,tw sure line... •tarn on tM pl•t. eMlTO'M —�ti / !• • e.. w,il•, iie ti: tom. rr«+) 1 — D N MAD • • �tG.cRT:�6•t • s VAD Ni �'it..YT 21J 1 Y i:D`J. Y !d 23 • M•Mbs hM M * MAM/M" OMMN AM "SMh qo O wo too !CM E M RAT e •11 wM R Tttlt Iw60rTe: yni.t tMr C��aPa•w Y•r trtnr Map, • q..r,•: pert rrMaD• owr atd PeR oat« d [It• fellr.q •••«tO•e a+Mrh .. u. ,.: 1n :M Ceun<Y d wur�W n, et.t• d egwt••at•, to til. nr 6u,cn 11.a • of w e•rte..•e Oa+. ur d et. eata.ew ;.wr<« . aaealan 11, ta•.en1v tie, erg 1). ttn�e w e••e l�.nu r.a or tr �k be5.00 t••t of tM gpyt• Ite.v !rl tA•rrf. c•u••e tM ••w to > wr+toe ad pl•ttel •• Wlli IMmll ]tt •(tt}TlU .ne m Mr.ar epru ad e.elrx. m nr Dr!_,< ter pm ae •tte eM .eu1[r .rte eutn.r ...aa• •. rtr. nn tot• peat. to rlt 1 rM,•d vie err nw«pr,v Y•r <ttvn1p • .•tool MK w•nitlp ••• enw pr•rttt. o •,y+e W It• wtivlr.e tr tn«• tot• ___ ti. t tw— alai®: ee•w tartYeele6 eewfw��llr Rf Ixa •y. Sta V� w e®Ue• mlee/Y w _ ytr ee,.aD,rtt art,t•rtc t.w .<1•rl•Ae•e rea.. r , b d tee Dr wu y. — d Iry ••t+ter•••• I•Rrr•!,p••• erv1 tf•ftwR•a,D. a M• < tw• pvenvlale. every tL••ty• Ir•wr . I Irr•M wraah vet I Mw nm: ,we pl•teN w Drrawp �T1tl an .�:. pLt r gi[eG ee••ol1 1d..mina: we ..,• pl•t 1.. aetwet ueerrre.e..•. d w1e surrey; Mt •11 e,•[aew •,• catete lY n,ota r ua• et•t ,. err we nater.r_Ir of •loot: eirt •1! on�tU 1,••e tee• ivr net lY pYae1 an tM grolwd •• Mtotra: trrt Ht• ovt•lb mt•Wrry litr •n tvfacl lY ae•aawt•e ..a tl,•t te•n •n m wtl•M• to d ev,evt�e a ..,e pl•t. —; lip —.brwlvr e,twt�• Li vru• b. t?elt R•'tF. Ue �Ia6eOtl. cparry � tmeMalw :n. tor.vo,ttc tn. r,w•n .<anw:.eve t.tv r lw1• a y d __. »e_ ertx., u,D .. e•la, lad s•rwr>. bury etplic r. eatw•d• 1q O>•Iv„n LD„r ___ _ amo. wtreQsvly. in1• pLt of rtg1LG wuool• tv •O..TIt1 ..• wvro..a «te •vaeM„e q w -:t Canc,I of cM C." d Urvo. eatttaru •t . retnla �tltq [lrwd Iru cn1• it �ae•t w o�utiva•r d Rna•Dst•t list rd wttbu.ry tlap.+ Cq,trer Iw• bat tgtwe !y tM CItY > t•• preerrle•e )D t•y Prtae M• •1•a•ee rltltott r•eelet d •twfl cast• •tte r•c�Atitwe, a ryrw-leee q wltwt••at• a[•tutr, I•ct,on SO5.63. 61~ by: rrt .,tY Irrt PIIOPOTI T•a UO YIi1C Qt91106 ytyyTQt. IpeVtw QLRY. elleOln t Mr•q ere:h w: t•w ea.elt ,n � tl a.:.r w•r• trw ewe r1e tr. LtE e••er ae•e a en,. plat e•tea ___—� e•r d _____._ '�_.. Hilt c. YOLR•a, tQ�v:e mom •tone F'_ _._____ ___—__ i>am suvcr olvulcat, Imwev[w t�ttm. ul••fow lunwni co Ot•pt•r et0, elttr•ot• law o/ tNa, tMe pl•t Me own Naroeee en1 e•y d tv_ eoeuwt n. l.v_T<w, wtoevtw wort+ 6IttS1a ti:. ._._._ __. mtwfy e•mmt, rarlrav mem. wt•ont+ f rrby r lh vet tl r, te,n •1st d IQtlre rrao� ao t®/rlOr r• t,le:t fat -rate Iw = at.— fl• —__ 1•Y "t IN a'e Lit of ()-[�.ON( ..`•`,`� 'Nvss.3, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 22,11 4' O :9J t A RESOLUTION GRhNTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 2 AND 3, PETER14AN AriDITION OF WEAR ENTERPRISES PARTNERSHIP APPLICATION NO. 1169 WHEREAS, William Wear, an authorized agent of Wear Enterprises Partnership, (hereinafter "the applicant") filed a formal subdivision application with the City on June 25, 1987 for the purpose of platting 6 lots of the property legally described as follows: The south 22 acres of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXCEPT the west 225 feet of the east 645 feet of the south 415.6 feet thereof (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, after due publi^hed and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statues 462.358 et. sec. and the City of Orono Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Oronc Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 20, 1987 at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on November 9, 1987, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of the applicant noting the following findings of fact: 1. The property is located within the RR-lB Single Family Rural Residential zoning district requiring a minimum of 2 acres of dry land within each newly created lot. 2. The property contains a total of 18.50 acres of dry contiguous land. 3. All six lots shall be served by a private road for which the placement and curb cut have been approved by the City Engineer. 4. All lots meet the required 200 feet width adjacent to private road and at the front yard setback line. 5. A single family residence can be constructed on all proposed lots without the need for further variances. 6. Septic testing has confirmed that all six lots contain adequate and suitable soils for on -site sewage disposal systems. Page 1 of 3 ti City of ORO NO L.( RESnLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ti NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon either one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat of Wear Enterprises Partnership per plat drawings by Phillip A. Nelson dated September 4, 1987, and further grants a variance to the standard that would require all lots have frontage on a public road with the creation of a private road, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits for new construction, the final plat must be filed with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office, road base installed and approved by City, and, if required improvements are not completed, the developers must execute a developer's agreement and post a letter of credit (150% of cost of remaining improvements). Required Improvements A) Private road to be constructed per standards set forth in Section 11.33, Subdivi 'ion 4 and 5 for roads serving 3-6 lots. Engineering plans must be approved by City prior to any construction. The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly schedul"d Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the mon-h: Final Plat Submittals 1. Surveyor to submit copy of prelimi-nary plat locating both primary and alternate septic test sites for each lot - designate to scale location of borings and perculation holes. 2. RECORD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar c;jpies and one (1) copy reduced to 1"=2001. Drawing to include: a) Lot lines and drainage easements of wetlands areas platted per preliminary survey. b) Dedication of "drainage and ut_lity easements" 10' wide - :g all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of internal property lines. c) Designate a 50 feet wide extension of the road outlot (B) to the northern boundary line to t-rve as future access to the north. d) Principal road „u.-iot should be designated as Outlot A. The City will as: for underlying road and utt:.-I-y easements over both outlots. Page 2 of 3 City of ORONO t� •f RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2291 ^ 3. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: a) Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b) The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. c) Executed Road and Utilities Easement - see copy attached - to he taken over both road outlots. d) Executed Private Road and Maintenance Covenants - please note this covenant does not deal with the issue of ownership of the road outlots and should be amended if desired. This may also be the instrument you wish to use to disclose unit cost for future users of road. e) Exec•lred Flowage '3nd Conservation Easement - ,t copy attached. f) Complete Road Name Request From - road name must be &eprove(., prior to final Flat approval. 4. FEES TO BE PAID: Total Due $1,500.00 a) Park dedication fee per current schedule: 5200.00 for each lot TOTAL FEE of $1,200.00 b) Final plat fee - $150.00 c) Legal fee for plat and associated documents - $150.00. Adopted by the City Council .,f the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held November 9th, 1987. ATTEST: AA1 t -'�V-7 orothy 117 Ilalli.n, City Clerk-�� Jr��n s k. Grahc Mayor Page 3 of 3 4 t 7 February 18, 1988 Thomas J. Barrett, Esq. Attorney at Law 3300 Piper Jaffray Tower Minneapolis, MN 55402 Re: Wear Lnterprises Partnership - Rolling Meadows 2nd Addition Dear Mr, Barrett: I am in the process if completing various documents required by the Ctty of Orono pursuant to Resolution No. 2291 on behalf of ,.ear Lnte:rpri.;es; rartnership with reference to the above -captioned matter. There seems to bean inconsistency and confusion concerning the road and utilities easement set forth in 3(c). The form provides for public ingress, ogress, access, road and utility purpose:, and uses. Outlots A and 2 in the Flat are for a private roadway. It ib my understanuing from the forn headed up Private RGadway Request that the City of Orono has no oLligation to maintain or service this private --ad and that the city .goes not intend to acquire or open private road as a public roadway. If this be the car why is it necessary to :Make availa�'Jle a road easement this time for public purposes? I would like to delete from your form that part relating to road purposes. I would appreciate if you would review this matter with staff of the City of Orono and advize the appropriate disposition of this request. Sincerely YO%Ars, Michals M READ AND UTILITIES EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, made this 26th _ day of February 19 88 , by ar.d between ear n er rises ar nershLp, a Ueneral Partnership foereinaftet referred to as Grantor Y ", and the Citv of G o, a municipal corporation, under the laws of the Stat tinnesota, hereinafter referred to as "Gra;,tee". NITNBS: fi'TH, that Grantor (8) , in cons aeration of the sum of one Dollar ($1 .00) ar•d for other good and valuable consideration given by Grantee, the receipt of which is acknowledged by Grantor (s) , do (es) hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey to Grantee, its successors and assigns, an easement for for public ingress, egress, access, road and utilities purposes and uses, on, across and under the larA in the County of Hennepin and Sitate of Minnesota, as follows: Outlot A and Outlot B, Rolling Meadows 2nd Addition. including, but not ID -,- way of limitation, a full and free right and authority to enter upon said land to construct, install, maintain, operate. and repair a sanitary Fewer interceptor, lift station, mair. or line, a water main or line, gravel or pavea road and any and all appurtenances including drainage control structures, incidenta• and related thereto, (such are hereafter collectively referred to as the Improvement) , and the Grantee shall have the right to make such use of said land as is reasonably necessary and adv3 a to the construction installation, maintenance, operation ar.d of the Improvement. In addition to any other reme,, -antee may have, the covenants and re-trictirns contained he may be enforced by injunction. J HAVE AND TO HOLD said easement unto said Grantee, its SLccessor•+ and assigrF. ^rmanently. •rdntor (s) herein certify that the li;nds Nrxi etn desv il- free and clergy of all encumb art $ xcept s as sAOUS, ►e u),- <f Robing Meadc-, % a A��it on IN WITME: Jay r.nd •��a � r.. 1, ?.OF, said Grantor (S) have set their hr.nd Ds) on above written. WEAP ENTEPPRISES PARTNERSHIP, A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP By:-- Wi liam W. Wear, Partner STATE OF MINNESOTA ss. CUUN.'Y OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of tiKll ��A' cf 19 88 , before me personally appeared l William W_ wear, Partner to me known to I the person (M descri bed in and -ho signed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they executt.." same as their free act and (I-ed. NOTARY PUBLIC -� A. H. MICHN LS STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: ,�, NQIART DUSLIC —MINNL )TA HENNEPIN COUNT This Instrument was drafted by: 2•r!; MYcommissonaxDrs1225-92 ; POPHAM, HAIK. SCHNOBRICH, KAUFMAN S DOTY 4344 IDS Center Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 335-9?31 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUfJCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING TdE PLAT OF ROLLING MEADOWS 2ND ADDITION FILE 11169 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State c,f Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, -he City Council has considered the application for a subdivision of a plat of 6 lots by William Wear, an authorized agent of Wear EnterpriTes Partnership (the subdivider); and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the RR -lb rural residential zoning district, finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that will allow its use as a single family residence to be fully developed without the need of . variances; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1. Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 2291, a resolution that apprc,%-ed the preliminary subdivision application. 2. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility easements. 3. Dedication on the plat of rights of way for public toads shown as Watertown Road and Old Crystal Bay Road. 4. Cre3tion of private roads shown cn the plat as Out lots A 6 B to be known henceforth rs Wear Lane North (north/south portion of Ou-lot A) and Wear Circle (east/i,est portion of Outlot A). 5. Concurrent with the creation of this private road, the subdivider has dedicated to the City, a road and utility easement granting to the City permanent access, improvement and utility easements over said Outlot; the subdivider has created non-exclusive ingress, egress, drainage and utilit- easements over sail Outlot in favor of all abutting and/or bene- -ing lots including a d^claration of certain maintenance covenants wherein each of the abutting and/or benefiting lot owners covenants and ?grees to permanently maintain and pay the cost of maintenance for said private road. Page 1 of 2 City of OR,ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CIT'v COUNCIL NO. 6. Dedication to the City of a Flowage and Conservation Easement providing for limitations on the use of wetlands and/or drainageways described therein and sY.-own on the plat as "drainage easements". 7. Execution of a Subdivider's Agreement providing for installation of certain improvements as a condition of subdivision approval. 8. Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fee in the amount of $1200.00. Page 1 c'' 2 9. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat ease—ents and convenants in the amount of $150.00. 10. Payment to the City of the final plat application fee of $150.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves tha plat of Rolling Meadows 2nd Addition, Hennepin. County, 'Minnesota; and further grants a variance to the standard that would require all lots have frontage on a public road with the creation of a private road, subject to the following conditions: 1. All 6 lots shall achieve access via the private road. 2. Lots 2 and 3, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 3 are considered through lots. All accessory structures on such lots must be approved via a Conditional Use Permit with the City of Orono. The placement of these structures shall be governed by standards set forth in Section 1075, Subdivision 4-C of the Zoning Code. 3. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono, either with the Hennepin County Recorders office or Registrar of Titles on or before October 25, 1988, together witn the certified original copy of this resolution and executed copies of the covenants and easements noted above. The approval granted by this resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the Citv of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 20th day ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk ' April 1988. Tames R. Grabek, Mayor Page 2 of 2 To: Mayor Grabek A.Pr) 2 Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Euil(ling & zoning Administrator Date: April 20, 1988 Subject: Application #1169, Wear Enterprizes Partnership 2950 Watertown koad - Road Name Requests Staff has reviewed the road names request, requested for the naming of the north/sov-h portion of the private road and the east/west portion. Staff has found no cor.flict with existing road names within the City and surrounding municipalities and recommends that the north/south road be named Wear Lane North and the east/west road be named Wear Circle. Applicant will be advised that a stop sign must be instailed at the intersection of Watertown Road. Payment for the sign and the installation is $75.00. Standard street signs can be ordered through the City at a charge cif $75.00 each. Applicant does have the option to install street signage, but such signage is subject to standards setforth by the City and the Public Works Coordinator should be contacted for further directives. ROLLING MEADOWS 2ND ADDITION �MwN lrs d,t ertt Moo .ut..( ft. SL fie •f ffk [Welt of sftlkr.Sk a Z! —Isn.1t sM-n•trc-- s IIW ! f � t �= a IT �l-1x• ����jt�� .^I 2 — -`'•mil'-, �`',: �t'd4. � J �tyls et r.•k ' WATERM... --4 a OUTLDT— 111J1 sarrt .- a + w EI s —44L pswnY!'W •' as _ i f .� a S & _ W 8 3a— w-- ROAD • f ma's: - - �M s W � \5re. li.a .: es. Shc W •f Qee �Lr.R.f=� ?dam Vtallty ..a drsla." %asw t. .ftw t►Y•: 9. P� �3 :1= MM Lll fO, at T M9 tetC.at'!E Vt. wttrrsn,p, — •" Fr*S:_t ,star of —g1 I In U. C-Awy of eW--vtn. St.0 of ftt. Se,in : 7. OL sc r ur it 1r[t Am33. Tawrn.6, ns, a--"94S.00 feet of for Sett► vs.ap i I ww case ut• ►r r to be am 0 eud 60 h"way dt—,- aw O�•i lawto &W the uttlity .et. d[utr" .ram ' . I In rIt-- wert•cf r/d ttir Otr}r Md three pt....•t. w Ir ea�rd o of Y-..--- 118 1 I SI Lm: • . I ttlut fLt.'UtP.;•, Lf P.Y :titY'.1.:; By By Q � °i ID J IAT[ or Munw-so" cutw" or 1�f � y� 3 1. tO.,pl..9 :net -men w •d01. O 9s —4 b 2 4 ►ts— � wtt..et+t+la.. P•trd lrrt•re,.p. I la t •wraby out:ty tent 2 tr.s .,r •rtr Qt pl.t .e soul , ,EADMIS JI) &=?,a. of rid .u[vwy, vrt ell dtstawcr .� nuNre ttr of . toot; twt eIi wain. / trrotrdLast..r�ew`+flra. tour dw' CCCJJ �' O �• mof am It WATERTOM ROAD s ADD. if • Don,t„ been fwowEfw.nt BEARINGS SNOwN ARE ASSUMED too 0 ow 200 r SCALE W FFEET STM R munot DT. mUfR A Moser:" Tt.s tor.yolro an.tr„snt — acutt•rl. IMINK). ,fnesont Pt[* pUt, of flf3LUNG .it.pt•, 11w .IDS' mtettotl W the C,ty of 0.'•to. «1Mrot d" of t«S eteLLmm.,Iwtaute o[ ter CO♦t rlst.N of :`paer.f VA" dr tsolw.d by t•e Cl' dl.ps.d without rwo.apt of .ACM to e• sun..a" S4•��es. Sect&- SCS.03. S slwd by: wr PROPErn T«. we KWIC ItE.imm fIOSA I H rw•y Cully art t.r. pry.•ts l.nd O.scrlbad t tn,& p:.t d.t,d _ Due C. KsdT.L, e1pelCrm lA/ft sw,np 5 f—t ^ t -kith. unles. oth ..... .rW.d—., 9 lot l,.ee. ..d t0 Sea" IISTISif•,. tl,eltrm 'Stl/f►, tar I'' ['.P^ 251 ' To: Mayor Grabek and City Council Members j'g r !fiOr �y�f� City Administrator Mark Bernhardson V V From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator Date: April 21, 1988 Subject: #1211 Gerald Neslund/James McCaffrey, 1225 Orono Oaks Drive - C.U.P./Variance - Request for Revised Location Request: Amendement of previous approval, to allow development of driveway thru adjacent lot at edge of wetland. List of Exhibits: A. Site Plan Submitted B. Staff Memo of 4-13-88 C. Applicants Letter of Request D. Soils Report By Braun Testing E. Code Section 10.03 Subdivision 6 (B) F. Plat Map G. Resolution #2305 Approved On November 23, 1987 H. Staff Sketch of Culverts, Probable Driveway Area, & Septic Sites Additional Facts Please review the memo of April 13, 1988. Since that memo, staff has walked the proposed revised driveway route. Some additional facts have been verified by staff, as follows: 1. Gerald Neslund, owner of Lot 8 and one of the deve , opers of Orono Oaks, initially in selling Lot 7 to McCaffrey refused ..o grant them an easement over Lot 8 for driveway purposes. Now, since the McCaffrey's are experiencing major problems in development of a driveway, they note that Neslund has agreed to grant such an easement. 2. It was apparen"ly Neslund's intent from the start to access Lot 7 via easement thru Lot 8, since when the house on Lot 8 was constructed in 1979, the base work for the driveway now proposed was completed, and a culvert placed across the minor drainageway at the northwest cornor of Lot 7. 3. The existing driveway base work generally is 26' or more from the edge of the wetland as we would interpret it today, except for a portion of that driveway approximately 100' south of Orono Oaks drive. Note that the Wetlands Conservation and Flowage Easement on Lot 8 is approximately 90' away from the proposed driveway at this point. 4. The proposed driveway easement location will have no effect on future drainfiela sites on Lot 8, and within Lot 7 the driven :an be constructed to easily avoid conflict with proposed primar And alternate drainfield sites. Zoninq File #1211 April 21, 1988 Page 2 5. Approximately 1.5 acres of dry buildable area will remain within the portion of Lot 8 west of the proposed driveway easement. Planning Commission reviewed Municipal Code Section 10.03 Subdivision 6 (B), and felt that this being a driveway easement only, and not a road Easement, would not be interpreted as leaving Lot 8 with substandard area. It is a fact, however, that regardless of the driveway easement, if we were to redefine the wetlands in Lot 8, there is a possibility that Lot 8 would contain less than acres of dry buildable land. Since that house is already constructed this would not appear to significantly affect development of Lot 8. Staff Recommendation Given the circumstance that development of a driveway thru the middle of the wetland appears unfeasible, staff feels it is appropriate to allow and encourage construction of a driveway over the proposed easement on Lot 8, finding that a driveway base already exists, and for all but a short segment is 26' or more from the wetland, subject to the following conditions: a. The 3 segments of culvert in poor condition at the drainagewav crossing near the boundary between Lot 7 and Lot 8, shall be removed and replaced with a single 24 inch culvert. b. To the greatest degree possible, the sand fill shall be removed from the area of the unsuccessful driveway construction, and the wetland allowed to return to its previous natural state. C. The driveway to be developed within Lot 7 shall be constructed to avoid conflict with the approved primary and alternate drainfield sites. d. The existing grading and filling permit obtained by applicants contractor shall remain in effect for the removal of fill and construction of the newly proposed driveway. Applicants contractor shall call for a final site inspection of both driveway sites once the sand fill is removed and the new culvert is placed. Staff recommends approval per the attached resolution. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO, A RESOLUTION REVISING THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, OF RESOLUTION #2305 FILE #1211 WHEREAS, Gerald Nes Lund is the owner of the property located at 1335 Orono Oaks Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Lot 8, Block 1, Orono Oaxs, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and James & Judy McCaffrey ('iereinaf ter the applicants") are the owners of the property located 1225 Orono Oaks Drive within the City of Orono legally described as Lot 7, Block 1, Orono Oaks, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the owner and the applicants were granted a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.55, Subd. 8 and granted a conditional use permit per Section 10.55, Subd. 10(B) per Resolution #2305 of the City Council dated November 23, 1987, to allow fill and grading within a designated wetland area where such onstruction is not normally allowed, in order to conptruct a priva residential driveway; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the conditions of approval of Resolution #2305 the applicants contractor obtained the necessary grading permit and commenced construction of the approved driveway through the wet' -and; and WHEREAS, due to soil conditions at the site of the approved driveway, construction of that dc4.veway was halted by the contractor prior to completion, because it. was determined that successful completion of that driveway mould not be technically or economically feasible; and WHEREAS, on Apr A. 1988 the applicants submitted a formal request to the City to c .-w the construction of a driveway in a revised location, requiring an easement through Lot 8, Block 1, Orono Oaks (1335 Orono Oaks Drivt�; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that the majority of the proposed driveway will be located 26' or more from the wetland on Lots 7 & 8, except for a portion of approximately 100' in length which is less than 26' from the edge of the wetland but not within the wetland. The Council further finds that the proposed driveway will cross a designated drainageway which can be feasibly crossed in conjunction with the use of a 24" culvert, which will result in no impediment to cur-ent or expented flows through that drainageway; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that the proposed driveway easement through Lot 8 will have no effect on potential future drainfield sites within Lot 8; and Page 1 of 5 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO, -- - -- ----- WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar tc it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; granting a variance would nut adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other r1anger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a conve,,ience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardsh-p or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the construction; of a driveway less than 26' from the edge of the designated wetland will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect. light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values; and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Co,incil iereby approves the applicants current request to revise the original driveway location to a more suitabl( �-ation within 26' of the designated wetland and requiring an easement across t"e neighboring property. The conditions of approval of the variance and conditional use permit granted in Resolution #2305 are hereby revised to read as follows: i. Land Alteration Permit #00623 isszd to the applicants contractor, Mason Homes, shell remain in effect for the restoration work required herein and for the proposed new driveway construction. Applicants shall call for a final site inspectJon upon cor,ietion of site restoration for the previously approved driveway, and upo.i completion of the revised driveway. 2. The contractor shall to the greatest extent possible remove the fill material that was placed in the wetland and shall remove any remaining fill placed near the cul-de-sac area. Restoration shall be completed and approved by Ctty staff no later than July 1, 1988. 3. The wetland areas disturbed by the unsuccessful driveway construction attempt shall be allowed to retcrn to their natural state. No further attempt to construct or reconstruct a driveway in that location is allowed without City approval. Page 2 of 5 t City of OR ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4. Prior to commencement of construction of a driveway in the revised location, the applicants sha 11 provide the City with a copy of a pri— e driveway easement over Lot 8 in favor of Lot 7. 5. The r at the drainageway crossing under the driveway shall be d-. eter. 6. The apr Lcant is advised to contact the "innehaha Creek Watersh Iistrict to obtain any permits they may require for thi }. 7. uthoritits granted by this resolution run with the property n( -gith L-he applicant, Lut are permissive only. Restoration shall be completed by July 1, 1988. Driveway construction c be commenced withi. one year of the date of Council approval, or the special conditions c.f this resolution will expire on that date (April 25, 1989). 8. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violaticn of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 9. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council o:. this 25th day of April, 1968. Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Property Owner(s) 11" - I of 5 To: Planning Commission i From: Michael P. Gaffr n, Assistant Zoning Administrator Date: April 13, 1988 Subject: #1211 Gerald Nes1und/James McCaffrey, 1225 Orono O.,ks Drive - C.U.P./Variance - Request for Revised Location The applicants were granted a Conditional Use Permit and variance to construct a driveway directly through a wetland in order to access their property on Orono Oaks Drive. The intent of the approval was to allow for a straight driveway that would disrupt the least amount of wetland. Their preliminary engineering work by McCombs/Knutson indicated a driveway could suitably be constructed using sand fill and geotechnical fa.j:-i^ to "float" the driveway over the wetland, which appeared to be a shrubby swamp and relatively stable. As construction of the driveway progressed, it became clear that the wetland was not as stable as had been thought, and the sand f ill is sinking away, leaving a large pond. It appears that the costs of continuing the driveway in this location will be prohibitive, and not feasible given the hundreds, perhaps thousands of yards of material that might have to placed i:i the wetland area to create a driveway access. The applicants are proposing to remove as much of the placed fill as possible, allowing the wetland to return to its previous state, id relocate the driveway further west on an easement over Lot #8. This proposed driveway location is on a higher elevation at the west end of the wetland, at the base of the hill on Lot 8. There will need to be a crossing of a drainage way and the appl'^ants note there is alr,-- a culvert in place. Applicants note that they had originally discussed this driveway location with the Neslunds, who also own Lot 8, but were unable to obtain such an easement until now, due to the unique circumstances. The McCaffrey's request and soil boring report have been submitted to City Engineer, Glenn Cook for review. As of this writ ,.rig, we have not heard back from Glenn with his recommendation on this r.: er. Staff Recommendation Because the applicants would not technically need nditional Use Permit or variance to construct a rl- eway that me . crosses a narrow drainageway as is now propose and because _h• rnposod driveway is greater than 26 from the edge if the wet Iar,O, as currently defined by drainage easements on Lot 8, it woA-Li appear that formal approval of the revised propo ' is not neces:.arily required. There still remains the question of w. it the wetland easement on r•ot 8 is extensive enou-r', to contain the en. wetland, however, it does i,ot seem appropriate at this time to request. ]itional wetland easement on Lot 8, since there is no request for an improvement that benefits Lot 8. Sta "` ••oli ld recommend that Planning Commission recommend conceptual app, for the new proposed driveway easement, subject to whatever rond: s are suggested by the City Engineer. This item will be scheduled for !'c u,ici 1 review at their meeting of April 25. l Aoril �, 1153 To: Mike ,affron and The City Co i.-, 1 0'' or+no Re: Revised driv-tar plan ''or :ole -), Orono Oaks pa. On Neveab.19, 1987 this council, "rant -I a •r-rian" to rerala Nesluna for lot #79 Orono Oaks Rd. :he variance wrantM° Derwis-ion to 1+u114 a =rivewar across -retlan� to the buildable Da-t 0" *110 lot. 3*rald Nesluna soli 1-:t#7 to James McCaffrey who preceoaed to build the read across the wetland as RDecifiea `,v halo Hamilton, engineer with McCoocbs, ani approved by this col.ncil. After completinc aDn-exi+aatel.V 70 ot. s° the prenesebd ,• /n ft,. needed to cross the wetlani; tho crust of the swain bro%e tinder the weight of the roaa;ducpinr the sand into onRn wat"r. Work wa4 haltR-� anti bsrinra Won* on 4eb. 2?nd. by 3ra`1n :n"in-e-inr.(s-A attac­.: -*Dart Dr. 2) It was determined that ths- watery mat-rial was 70 •c '40 "t. aeon along wos+ o* th- Drones&0 arivewa7's lon•th. T}lo s•.ra-n m-t-rial -s not dens- eno1wh to 'r1oat" a road ev^ mastic; as is nor-tzlly one with wetland. 3ra^n 7,n•. felt th" only sjlutinn that ff!i[ht work was t3 ''ill th- broak-throu"h with wnnd^)^iDs. 1Ml;4#1nr a roa;a in tUs -:inner is not without risk, not to "nti�n tho mist is n��hibittv�. No to the above cnnsiclorations wm wish to M•vi"e the f4riV1-!Wa♦ Dath to buildable !rnunr' by cressinv let 48 witk an easewent roa; ![ranted is is ' .y Richard Nesluna, owner e10' let 06. 1'he "easement read" (son attached tone, shown Ath broken lirws across lot f8 to lot 67 is already in existence. The road was clwarea an-' the reaa bed put in place as Dart of the eririnal 'e-eI nTment %" Or+ne Oaks Rd. in JQ78. It is our intent to proceed with a drivowa♦ in th-'- .*vised canner, with no disturbance or chanve to the dratnare casement 1.nat exists or to the wetland area. The sand , oD♦sit e? ':." the area of the "failed" driveway will be re-ieved a so the wetlanu s•' _ return itself to a natural state. Thank veu "or vo-a- assistance in this cha"'enrtriq matter. Sinc•rol�, J McCaffrj L L BRAUR" Oi.alrfy Services Since 1957 MIIINESOTA CONSUL TING ENGINEERS., molneapol", ENGINEERING TESTING GEOTECHNICAL AND IAATERIALS SI c JIX9 Reply to address/phone M: Hoche,ler SI Paul :,sFTUAT10 OFFICES ORTM DUOTA E4+5rndrii ii'+s1Un Minot MONTAU ljillrngs March 2, 1988 30remdn -J AW GiKago SWon PE ne'onG Kruse DE D Kluem' ►e I, E H pntuWr Pf James McCaffrey ^ry gwrna„ist mD 9,180 Aspen Circle unes J Craig A P E %itAAllen PE Eden Prairie, MN 51.344 im 1.1 Weyyrauo F i Xmas R H umyf•, Michael M Heuer F E ZVI F ovoial+ Norman E Hall I y A lgiher P E dham K coav P E AFFILIATEO E-0MPAROS elain Envuo^.nx-.'a Lat-Va10"e5 irr &aun Pavemenl Techrwlogies Inc Mr. McCaffrey: P.C. Box 35108 !lpls., MN 55435 (612) 941-5600 RE: 88-082 SOIL INVESTT11'jATI1-.1 Proposed rriveway Lot 7, Block 1 Orono Oaks _rono, Minnesota As requested, we have complete' a soil investigation along the proposed drivawiy alignment. .'i.e pu:pose cf the investigation was to aid in eva' ating tiie subsurface soil conditions for sup- pert of the drive .a, . INTRCDUCTION The boring 10L Ions are s:: �­i on the attached sketch. The sur- face elevat'jr,s of the borings were estimated from the topographic sites plan provided. Therefore, el-;�vat�ons should to considered approximate. The one penetration, i.t`: t r- .ring was perforated o:. L ibruary 2 1988, with a track-mou,ited core arO auger drill. 6ampling f-.lr the boring war conducted n -Aan-e witr AS -A D 1586 "Pene�rat-.ion Test and 5p'.it-L..rt:e r�i,,y �:'f Soils.' ,'sl_nq this method, tMe advar:ced the bete ho'L� with the hollow-stt. , 11ger to the tF.•st d2-th. Then a 140-pound hammer failing 30 inches drove a stani.. 2-inch OD, split -barrel sampl-r a total penetration of 1 1/2 feet below the tip of the hollow-ster,t aliger. The blcws for the last foot of penetrat;iv.! were recorded and are an 1;idrstx of soil sti r-ngth characteristic.;. Sampies were taken at 5-foot intervals to r!.^ termination depth ;f the `_,oring. T► •,-rwer auger borings t,_ se take.i +n accordance with P.JTM D 1452 "fir. -nvestigation and Sampling oy Au;.:. Borings." :he s-.'- 88-082 James McCaffrey -2- March 2, 1988 classifications and strata depths were inferred from the disturbed samples brought to the surface by rotation of the auger. Soils encountered in the borings were visually and manually classified in the field by the crew chief in accordance with ASTM D 2487 "Unified Soils Classification System" and ASTM D 2488 "Recommended Practice for visual and Manual Description of Soils." A copy of ASTM D 2487 is attached. All samples were then returned to the laboratory for review of the field classifi- cations by a soils engineer. Representative samples will remain in our Minneapolis office for a period of 60 days to be available for your examination. Immediately after taking the final sample in the bottom of the borings, we probed the bore holes with the hollow -stem auger in the ground to check for ground water. In addition, immediately after withdrawal of the auger, the bore holes were again probed and the depth to cave-in and the presence or absence of water was noted. The borings were then immediately backfilled. RESULTS Log of Boring sheets indicating `he depths and descriptions of the various soil strata, the penetration resistances, and water level information are attached. The depths shown as changes bet- ween the strata are generally only approximate. The actual changes are likely transitions, and the depths of the transitions likely vary horizontally. The borings typically encountered peat swamp deposits along the driveway alignment. The peat extended to the 19-foot depth at boring B-4 and 29 feet at borings B-1 and B-3. The borings were then stopped in silty sand. The exception is boring B-1 which had 2 1/2 feet of sand fill overlying the seat swamp deposits. Ground water was encountered in the investigation with.n 1 to 2 feet of the swamp grade. fluctuation in ground water will occur due to seasonal and annual weather variations. ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS It is our understanding that a driveway approximately 275 feet long may be constructed across this existing marsh. The dri- veway will be approximately 3 feet above existing swamp grade and will be approximately 14 feet in width. As requested, we have not completed an engineering analysis for construction of the driveway across this marsh. If engineering LPRAUR- 88-082 James McCaffrey -3- March 2, 1988 analysis is required at a later date, we would be pleased to pro- vide an addendum to this report that would discuss construction. GENERAL REMARKS Services performed by the geotechnical and material engineers for this project have been conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in this area under similar budget and time restraints. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. If you have any questions regarding the information in this report, please contact us at your convenience. very truly yours, BRAUN ENG EERI G _'ESTING, INC. I4u er, P.E. enior Engineer RAH:gec/A:88-082 Attachments: Boring Logs (4) 1%ws/4 Li�nir-S /ENET�i¢T/CN &�eim6- Zer M-OW Xle � � � o`6,Eo pRivFwai B-y 170- s �-QL''o2 BRAUR olf N. 'G TiCII &-n Isa+* ENGINEERING TESTING PROJECT:88-082 SOIL INVFSTIGATION BORING: B-1 LOCATION: Proposed Driveway Lot 7, Block 1 Orono Oaks See Attached Sketch. Orono, MN DATE: 2122188 SCALE: 1 " _ 1' ASTM Tests or Notes Elev. Depth 02487 Description of Materials BPF WL 53* 0 Svmbol (ASTM D2488) SP-SM FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine to medi;im-grained, 950.5 2.5 with a trace of Gravel, brown. PT PEAT, fibrous, black, wet. 924.0 29 *qra i nod, with SILTY CLAY layers, 973.01 30 S LTY SAND, fine to rr,ed , um- * END OF BGRING. —ay, wet. Water level down 31 immediately Porinq immediately after withdrawal of auger. backfilled. lENGINECMIG TESTING PROJECT: 88-082 SOIL INVFSTIGATION Proposed Driveway Lot 7, Block 1 Orono Oaks Orono, MN BORING: ST-2 LOCATION: See Attached Sketc,•. DATE: 2/22/88 SCALE: 1 " = 4' Elev. 51 ± Depth 0 ASTM D2487 Symbol Description of Materials (ASTM D2488) BPF WL Tests or Notes 931.0 20 PT PEAT, fibrous, black, wet. (Swamp Deposit) M.C. = 488% WH WH WH 4;H 929.0 22 OL ORGANIC SILT, olive, wet. (Swamp Deposit) 970 24 L ORGANIC SILT, black, wet. (Swamp Deposit) SM SILTY SAND, dark gray. (All vium 5 END OF BORING. Water level at the surface immediately after withdrawal of auger. 8,)rinq immediately hackfillec+. wrlvra vr- ►��ry�rv�.i rarw&"hii ENGINEERING TESTING 0 C E a� m a U C O a d a 0 v� PROJECT:88-082 SOIL INVESTIGATION BORING: R_3 Proposed Driveway LOCATION: Lot 7, Block 2 Orono Oaks Orono, MN See Attached Sketch. DATE: 2/22/88 1 SCALE: 1 " = 4' ASTM Tests or Notes Elev. Depth D2487 Description o1 Materials BPF WL +_ 0 Symbol (ASTM D2488) PT PEAT, fibrous, black, wet. 926.0 25 OL ORGANIC SILT, olive, wet o2 29 q21.01 30 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, ara , wet. END OF BORING. Water level down 3' immplli:7tely Boring immediately after withdrawal of auoer. back filled. 1JVY'II11i��r ENGINEERING _TESTING ll PROJECT: 88-082 SOIL INVESTIGATION BORING: R-4 Proposed Driveway LOCATION: Lot 7, Block 2 Orono Oaks Orono, MPJ See Attached Sketch. GATE: 2/22/88 1 SCALE: 1" = 4' ASTM Tests or Notes Elev. Depth D2487 Description of Materials BPF WL 951 ± 0 Symbol (ASTM D2488) PT PEAT, fibrous, black, wet. I C 932.0 1Q CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, gray, wet. 929.0 22 END OF BORING. Water level not encountered to cave-in depth of 5' immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring immediately backfilled. combined with one or more abutting lots or portions thereof so as to create a lot meeting the requirements of this Zoning Chapter. Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 2. Its "R" Districts of Greater Than One Acre and Served by Public Sanitary Sewer. A lot of record in any "R" District in the City in excess of one acre, which does not meet the requirements of this Zoning Chapter as to area or width only, may be utilized for single family detached dwelling purposes if the Counci: f'_nds: (a) It is at least one acre in size, and the average width of the lot is at least 100 feet; (b) It is served by public sanitary sewer; (c) It otherwise meets the requirements of this Chapter or other applicable City Code provisions. 3. In "R" Districts Not Served by Public Sanitary Sewer. A lot of record in any "R" District in the City not served by public sanitary sewer must meet the area and width requirements of the Zoning Chapter and shall not he utilized for single family detached dwelling purposes without Council approval. Source: City Code Effective Date: 4-1-84 B. Combination of Separated Parcels Prohibited. No lot or parcel of land which is divided by a public, private or platted road or road easement, which results in any segment thereof being less than the minimum acreage required for that zoning dis- trict, shall be allowed to be combined with any separated parcel of land across the road for purposes of qualifying under the minimum acreage, open space, required yard, setback or sanitary or septic system requirements, nor shall building or density credits be credited or transferred between such parcels under any provisions of this Chapter. Each separate parcel must individually conform to the provisions of this Chapter in connection with construction of improvements thereon. Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 C. The separation by the transfer or sale of non- conforming, undeveloped lots not served by public sanitary sewer, aligned in a contiguous arrangement, undivided by a public or private road or road easement and under same or common ownership is not permitted without Council approval. Council approval is not required if the separation of such lots results in individual building sites that satisfy the area and width requirements of the Zoning Chapter. Source: City Code Effective Date: 4-1-84 ORONO CC 254 (4-1-84) 0 F. . two City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 AND GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 10(13) FILE #1211 WHEREAS, Gerald Neslund (hereinafter "the applicant") is the caner of the property located at 1225 Orono Oaks Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 7, Block 1, Orono Oaks, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono to permit the construction of a residential driveway through a desi(_,Iated wetland area within the property, requiring excavation, fill and grading %-.ie iin a designated wetland area where such construction is not normally allowed per Zcning Code Section 10.55, Subdivision 8, unless a conditional use permit is granted per Section 10.55, Subdivision 10 (B). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of )no, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 01211. 2. The property is located in the RR-lB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. 3. The property is approximately 4.2 acres in total area of which approximately 0.33 acres was designated as protected wetland area as part of the subdivision of Orono Oaks -i r 1978. The dry buildable area within Let 7 ur.cer the cLrrent apparent land conditions is at least 2.08 acres. 4. The Orono Planning Coimrission reviewed this application on October 19, 1987 and recommended approval of the proposed viriance and conditional use permit h,ased on the following findings: a) The area of the property that contains actual wetland appears currently to extend beyond the boundaries of the wetland easement granted with the original subdivision. CJity of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL No. 2305 b) Applicant proposes to construct the shortest possible driveway between the cul-de-sac and the dry land area of the property in order to minimize the area of actual wetland disrupted by driveway. c) In order to construct a driveway as originally intended on the property along the northerly lot boundary between Lots 6 and 7, a greater area of actual wetland would be disrupted than by construclLion under the current proposal. d) The applicant has a right to have access to the property, and since no access easement exists to serve Lot 7 via any neighboring property, the variance is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant. e) The apparently variable nature of thj.s wetland and the elevation and size of the existing culvert and drainag,way leading away from the wetland, coupled with a variability in topography and vegetation types would suggest that the wetland boundary is not easily definable. The Planning Commission recommended on a 4-2 vote that the City not require total redefinition of the wetland at this time. 5. Further staff review indicates that an additional area of drainage from the south side of the Luce Line enters this property, hence it is appropriate to require the granting of Drainage and Conservation & F1owace Easements over an additional area of the property. Given the outlet elevations to the north of this wetland, it is unlikely that the wetland boundary would ever be greater or higher than the 952' contour. It is therefore appropriate that all areas below the 952' contour within the property boundaries be designated as protected wetlands through a Conservation 6 Flowage Easement. 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air ncr pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is iecessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive plan of the City. F-ge 2 of 5 City of ( 110NO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2305 7. The City Council f inds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a driveway through the designated wetland will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a f.re hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that they proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and otjeccivf!s of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to allow construction of a driveway through a designated wetland area and grants a conditional use permit per Section 10.55, Subdivision 10 (B) for the excavation, filling, and grading necessary to construct such a driveway through the wetland, subject to the following conditions: 1. The culvert underncath the drive% --ay shall be 24 inches in diameter. 2. The applicant is advised to contact Minnehaha Creek watershed District to obtain the permits that they will require for this work. 3. The proposed driveway shall be no wider than 14 feet at the driving surface, with 3 foot shoulders on each side in addition to that 14 feet, and shall maintain 3:1 side slopes as proposed by the designer. The total width of the driveway taken up by the driveway and fill shall average no more than 35 feet. 4. A Flowage & Conservation Easement shall be granted within the property boundaries below the 952' contour. Applicant's surveyor shall provide a metes and bounds legal description for the boundaries of that wetland to be designated. 5. In the event tha the driveway is constructed in conjunction with an actual building permit application for a residence on the property,. no grading permit shall be required. In the event that driveway construction occurs prior to application for a huilding permit on the property a grading and Excavation permit shall be obtained by the applicant or his grading contractor prior to such construction. Construction of the Driveway shall be subject to City inspection and approval. F aqe ? of 5 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2305 'a' r 6. Authorities granted by t!is resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit or grading permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (November 23, 1988). 1987. A, 7. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishah7• as a misdemeanor. 8. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution ir the chain of title of the property. 'IT: Propert Adopte.; `-)y the Orono City Council on this 23rd day of November, P,igf- 4 cf Jai es R. , Mayor 4 � i 1 STATE. -OTA COUK7 >:EPIN City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. :21 30 5 Or thi day of 01 198 before me - .rotary Public withit► .and for said county, personally appeared known to me `o be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing insLrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deeO. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this /L-" day of ��e� 198, before me a Nota v Publi wit n and'fo�,�} s'aid1County, personally appeared rc llcl �t(�n� Gn4� � ^n5� known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoinginstrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. AYUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES F Pagc 5 of yw �� 1.PE? 2 5 19c To: Mayor Grabek and City Council Members City Administrator Mark Bernhardson Prom: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: April 21, 1988 Subject: #1233 Michael Halley Homes, Inc. 2715 Pence Lane - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Resolutionn"q Zoning District - LR-lB Area - .94 acres or 41,148 s.f. Pertinent Ordinances and Issues - Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.55 Subdivision 8 - No land alterations within lakeshore protected area and no permanent structures. Applicant must replace deterioret'_ng retaining walls within the 0-75' setback area destrgyed in s-.or.n of July 23, 1987. Existing block walls to be replaced by boulder walls. No increase in hardcover proposed from existing hardcover. Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 and 21 (2) - ice 24, Second Series - Conditional Use Permit required for 1 r_' ?, erations within the lakeshore protected area. In addition, s• i, ds set forth in Subdivision 21 that defines unusual land alte - uns, accompaning building permit. The proposed land alterations involve protection of footings and foundation. The excavation for the foundation does not exceed the 12' depth. Additional fill will be used for the grading around the house, providing adaquate drainage away from the house foundation and ultimate protection of foundation, no land alterations proposed within 5' of the lut line and applicant proposes no additional fill to be brought in for landscaping outside of the fill brought in for foundation and frost footing protection adjacent to the house area. Hardcover Facts - 0-75' Area = 13,425 s.f. in area Existing _ 650+ s.f. Proposed = 537 s.f. (access stairs to be limited to a 4' width) 75-250' Area - 27,723 s.f. in area Allowed Hardcover = 6,931 s.f. or 25% Proposed Hardcover = 6,737 s.f. or 24.3% (review staff memo of December 16, 1987 for more details, Exhibit A) List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Staff Memo 12/16/87 "xhibit B - Staff Memo 3/16/88 Exhibit C - Staff Memo 4/15/88 Exhibit D - Application Exhibit E - Property owners List Zoning File #1233 Page 2 of 4 Exhibit F - Plat Map Exhibit G - Cook Letter 12/15/87 Exhibit H - Cook Letter 2/24/88 Exhibit I - Cook Letter 3/17/88 Exhibit J - Cook Letter 4/20/88 Exhibit K - Halley Letter 3/7/88 Exhibit L - First Grading Plan/Survey - December Planning Commission Meeting Exhibit M - Second Grading Plan/Survey - March Planning Commission Meeting Exhibit N - Third Grading Plan/Survey - Final Plan Exhibit 0 - Planning Commission Minutes 12/21/87 Exhibit P - Planning Commission Minutes 3/21/88 Exhibit Q - Applicant's Engineers Letter of 4/13/88 Exhibit R - Profile of Boulder Wall - Photos of Existing Block Wall Exhibit S - Floor Plans Exhibit T - Elevations at East/West Property Line Exhibit U - East, West, South Elevations Exhibit V - Cross Section Review of Application December Planning Commission Meeting At the December Planning Commission Meeting, the application covered the excavation of the lakeshore yard to allow for a walkout design. As a result of the excavation of the lakesnore yard, the upper tear of the existing block retaining wall would be removed. The applicant proposed redoing the lower tear adjacent to the lakeshore. The application was denied, finding no adaquate hardship to allow the excavation of the lakeshore protected area. Applicant was advised to move the house back further. Note, this application involves the construction of a new residence, there is no attempt to use the foundation of existing residence. Applicant was advised that there was adaquate room to the rear of the property to create the walkout design. The application was unanimously denied by the Planning Commission. March Meeting c,f the Planning Commission Applicant prrsented 7 revised plan to the Planning Commission that now sought to rerlace the existing retaining walls within the lakeshore yard and approval of a Conditional Use Peri-it and Variance for an underground drainage ti:.e that would serve to drain the bowl area now created by the higher elevations lakeside of the patio walkout area. Review Exhibit M and V. Note that a berm prevents drainage to flow down the lakeshore. It necessary to provide a release for the drainage retention trapped in l area in order to prevent flooding of the lower level of the residence. light of recent actions and recommendations of both Planning Commission ,r,-] Council, the underground drainage pipe was denied. The portion of the application that would have allowed the replacement of the lakeshore retaining walls damaged in the July storm was approved by the Planning Comimission. 41 Zoning File #1233 Page 3 of 4 Current Review The Planning Commission was asked to review the current plan prior to presenting the final plan before the Council. Unfortunately, the Planning Commission refused to act because there was no one representing the applicant present at the meeting. The purpose of the review was merely as an informative item to provide the Planning Commis-zion the opportunit..- to review the revised plan that would no longer require a Conditional Use Permit or Variance for an underground pipe. The drainage that would collect in the bowl area in front of the walkout would now be drained via a trench drain, which would drain to a sump pit/pump station below the basement floor and discharge to the west of the house about 90' up from the lakeshore providing natural surface flow over the grassed lakeshore bank to the lake below. In his letter of 4/20/88, Cook confirms the system as proposed will provide for discharge of the storm water in an acceptable manner. In addition, he recommends venting of the installation to the roof and that it have a sealed access cover. It should be noted that the final plan requires only approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Variance for the retaining walls to be replaced within the lakeshore protected area. The drainage from the bowl area created by existing higher elevations in front of the walkout are now being treated outside of the 75' setback area, requiring no land alteration within the protected area. The real problem for the Planning Commission for this review has been the issue of the degree and intensity of the land alterations required to install the walkout with the given elevations. In reviewing Exhibit K, the applicant advises that some 350 cubic yards of sand will be brought in as the base under the concrete floor slabs required in Minneosota to prevent frost heaving, located inside or under the proposed structure. 130 cubic yards of fill will be brought to the site to provide foundation protection and the approximate 582 cubic yards excavated from foundation preparation shall be used to also provide the additional foundation protection znd necessary back -filling to provide adaquate drainage away from the house. Note, that in Cook's letter of 2/24/88 he notes that the direction of run- off from the site will not be significantly effected by the filling. A staff member has confirmed that the height elevation noted at 27' is correct as there is less than 50% of the lower level exposed. In consideration of the recent amendment that defined unusual grading for the building staff, staff finds that the application does not involve unusual grading levels. Frost footing/foundation protection involves not only grading to protect stability of a foundation, but also involves protection of that foundation and structure from surface drainage/infiltration problems. Back filling is part of the footing foundation protection. The applicant does not propose any changes in elevations within 10' of the lot line and no excessive amounts of fill have been brought in, except to provide the adaquate foundation protection and back -filling demands for the project. The Flanning Commission members were most concerned that in the future an owner would come in and attempt to excavate the lakeshore yard, in order to do away with the bowl situation and problems associated with the drainage. Zoning File #1233 Page 4 of 4 Staff would suggest that in the final resolution approving the application, that a future notice to the owner be included that would prohibit any consideration of excavation within the lakeshore protection area and assurance of adaquate maintainance of the existing drainage treatment system so that future drainage problems do not arise. The enclosed approving resolution has been drafted to include only that portion of the application that dealt with the restoration of the deteriorating retaining walls within the 0-75' setback area. Note that the applicant has been advised that the stairs within the lakeshore yard cannot exceed the allowed width of 4'. The resolution has also been drafted to include future notice to the owner regarding prohibition against excavation of lakeshore protected area. For more details on the review of this application, please review the enclosed staff memos, Exhibits A, B, and C. Please contact staff if you have any questions on the material or if you seek additional information prior to the meeting. To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: December 16, 1987 Subject: #1233 Michael Halley Homes, 2715 Pence Lane - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing • Zoning District - LR-lB Area - .94 acres or 41,148 s.f. Pertinent Ordinances and Issues - Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - No land alterations within lakeshore protected area and no permanent structures. Applicant must replace deteriorating retaining walls within the 0-751. Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 and 21 (2) - Ordinance 24, Second Seriea - Conditional use permit required if fill brought to site exceeds 100 cubic yards if this fill is not required for adequate coverage of frost footings/foundation. Applicant must clarify. . . applicant discusses a second option that involves bringing in 2,400 cubic yards of fill to raise grade. In addition, conditional use permit required to restore r- t: ning walls. Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - Variance to place new structures and perform land alterations within protected area. Hardcover !acts - 0-75' Area = 13,425 s.f. in area 75-250' Area = 27,723 s.f. in area 'owed Hardcover = 6,931 s.f. or 25% ^sed Hardcover = 6,737 s.f. or 24.3% (please note this does not include any improvements as shown in elevations within street yard, this only includes improvements within the lakeshore yard, but does include the driveway)* * House = 2,600 s.f. Drive = 3,195 s.f. Lakeside Deck = 410 s.f. Steps - Lakeshore Only Based on 4' Standard = 148 s.f. Retaining Walls Only Within Lakeshore Yard = 384 s.f. (This includes the elimination of the continuous wall at upper level of lakeshore yard) Zoning File #1233 December 16, 1987 Page 2 of 3 List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Site Plan/Grading Plan Exhibit F - Floor Plans/Elevat- ons Exhibit G - Engineer's Report As the applicant's addendum notes, this application involves the construction of a new residence, not the rebuilding of the existing foundation (review Exhibit E). The application has been reviewed as a new building permit application. Hardcover will consider only proposed improvements and improvements to remain. Retaining walls within the lakeshore yard must be replaced as they are old and in a deteriorated state and this condition was probably worsened by the storm of July 23, 1987. The applicant asks that we consider the major alteration of the lakeshore bank to provide a more natural, consistent setting with the proposed walk -out design (removal of 478 cubic yards within the 75-250' setback and 1,075 cubic yards within the 0-75' setback area), as opposed to other proposed option of raising grade along north, east and west sides of house requiring approximately 2,400 cubic yards of additional fill on site. Based on Section 10.03, Subdivision 21, if fill is in excess of 100 cubic yards, it must be for adequate coverage of frost footings/foundation. If applicant can support this claim, a conditional use permit is not needed. The application is similar to at least 2 recent applications involving proposed walk -outs that required alterations within the 0-75' setback area. These residences were located either in or at the 75' setback line and were denied. The applicant can create a walk -out design within the 30'+ between proposed house and the 75' setback line (review Exhibit E). The applicant can move the house back to provide more rccm for desired lake front yard adjacent to house with a combination of filling and graduating the cuts for walk -out up to the 75' setback line. The Engineer in his review sees no environmental advantage regarding water quality from the proposed lakeshore alteration and recommends against the major alteration within the 0-75' setback area. Issiies for consideration: 1. Does the fact that the house is located out of the 75' setback area have any bearing on this review? 2. Does the elimination of the continuous block retaining wall along the entire shoreline outweigh the alteration and removal of 1,070 cubic yards of fill? Is this an aesthetic or environmental consideration? Which is appropriate for the City in its consideration of this application? UAI Zoning File #1233 December 16, 1987 Page 3 of 3 3. How does the fact that we are dealing with a new residence structure on the property affect your decision? Should it have an affect in your consideration? 4. Under what conditions would you approve alterations within the 0- 75' setback area? Environmental benefits. Comprehensive improvement of drainage - not only on a single property but also surrounding properties. Severe erosion. Ease of maintenance reducing hazard to homeowner. Ability to eliminate structural hardcover. Others Staff Recces ndation - To recommend a conditional use permit and variance per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to allow the replacement of retaining walls within the lakeshore yard and reconstruction of steps not to exceed 4' width standard and to deny the request of the applicant to alter existing grades within the 0-75' lakeshore protected area requiring 1,075 cubic yards of fill to be removed, based on the following findings: 1. No appreciable environmental benefit to quality of run-off. 2. Limits disturbance within lakeshore protected area. 3. No acceptable hardship has been demonstrated by applicant as there is adequate depth to move house further away from shoreline and suggest to the applicant that he consider either moving the house back or use the 301+ feet of the existing width in front of proposed house to provide walk -out and that the City may consider granting a conditional use permit to allow fill brought to site to artifically raise grades. A grading plan (proposed contours plus amount and location of fill, cross profile) must be submitted prior to forma; action by the Planning Commission if applicant wishes to reconsider and request tabling. TO: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley 08 Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: Thomas J. Jacobs, Building official DATE: March 16, 1988 SOBJ: #1233 Michael Halley Homes, Inc., 2715 Pence Lane - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Second Revi<_w Liat of Exhibits - A - Application B - Property Owners list C - Plat Map D - Notice of Public Hearing E - Staff memo 12-16-87 F - Applicant's letter 3-7-88 G - City Engineer Report 2-24-88 H - Staff letter 2-26-88 I - Notice of Planning Commission Action 12-21-87 J - Planning Commission Minutes 12-21-87 K - Proposed Site Plan 11-25-87 L - Retaining wall - copy photos & construction plan M - Drainage Pipe Plan N - Elevation - exterior O - Revised Site Plan Applicant has appeared before the Planning Commission on 12-21- 87. This application has been revised and resubmitted. Description of Request - Applicant will be removing the existing dwelling unit on the property and replacing it with a new structure. During construction applicant would like to reconstruct an existing retaining wall within 75' of the lakeshore. To construct the retaining wall, the applicant is requesting the following: 1. Conditional use permit - land alteration retaining walls within 75' of lake. 2. Variance - Land alteration within 75' of lake - retaining wall/drainage pipe. 3. Conditional Use Permit - drainage pipe within 75' of lake. Pertinent Ordinances and Issues -- Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - No land alterations within lakeshore protected area and no permanent structures. Applicant must replace deteriorating retaining walls within the 0-75'. Zoning File #1233 March 16, 1988 Page 2 Section 10.55, Subd. 8 - Variance to place new structures and perform land alterations within protected area. Section 10.03, Subd. 19 and 21(2) - Ordinance 24, Second Series - Conditional use permit required if fill brought to site exceeds 100 cubic yards if this fill is not required for adequate coverage of frost fo,)tings/foundation. Fill Brought Onto Site - Section 10.03, Subd. 19 and 21(2), Ordinance 24, Second Series - Applicant will not require a conditional use permit for fill brought onto the site. Applicant has submitted plans showing that the proposal does not fall into the guidelines for unusual land alteration. The revised plan (Exhibit K 6 O) is a major change from the proposed plan first received. Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Land alteration within 75' of lakeshore. Applicant is requesting to install a 6" PVC pipe within 75' of the lakeshore setback (Exhibit M). Applicant is requesting this drainage pipe to remove drainage water from an area with an elevation of 945.5. This area is the lowest on the property outside the 75' setback (see Exhibit- O). This low area is created to maintiain a walkout style house, as stated in staff memo 12-16-87 (Exhibit E). The City Engineer's review is not available cc the time of this report, but will be si. emitted to you at the Plani:ing Commission meeting. Conditional Use Permit - Retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore. Section 10.55, Subd. 8. Applicant is requesting to restore his retaining wall within the 75' setback. These retaining walls must be replaced as it is olu and deteriorated and the condition was worsened by the July 23, 1987 storm (Exhibit L). The applicant is proposing to remove the concrete block wa)1 and replace it with natural stone (Exhibit L). This retaining wall is two tiers high. The lower wall is approximately 65', and the upper wall is approximately 95'. The existing stairs will be removed and new stairway is proposed in the center of the retaining walls. Staff has inspected the site and found that the existir.q retaining walls are in an unsafe condition. Staff Reco� ndation - Staff recommends the following: rs"30, Zoning File #1233 March 16,1988 Page 3 A. Approval of the conditional use permit/variance to restore the retaining wall within 75' of the lakeshore based on the following findings: 1. That the existing retaining wells are in an unsafe conditon. 2. That the conditional use permit approval is not a detriment to the health, safety, and welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That it meets all requirements of granting a conditional use permit pursuant to Section 10.09, Subd. 6. 4. That it meets requirements of granting a variance pursuant to Section 10.08, Subd. 2. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Soil erosion control is provided. 2. Separate Luilding permit is obtained from the City. B. Approval of the conditional use permit/variance to install a storm drain pipe within 75' of the lake based on the following findings: 1. Lakeshore setback area is the only area which has a lower elevation than the area to be protected. 2. That the conditional use permit approval is not a detriment to the health, safety, and welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That it meets all requirements of granting a conditional use permit pursuant to Section 10.09, Subd. 6. Approval based on the following conditions: 1. City Engineer approval of the pipe size. 2. Rip rap is provided f rom out let of pipe to shoreline. 3. Temporary soil erosion control is provided and maintained until permanent soil erosion control has taken effect.. e �9(c To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelly Planning Commission Members City Administrator Mark Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator Dater April 15, 1988 Subject: #1233 Michael Halley Homes, Inc., 2715 Pence Lane - Conditional Use Permit & Variance - Final Review of Revised Plan The applicants have submitted a revised grading and drainage plan. The t%ro items of note are as follow: 1. House floor elevations remain as before. The "basin" at the walkout level is proposed to be drained via a trench drain, which would drain to a sump pit/pump station below the basement floor, discharging to the west side of the house about 90' from the lake, for nat iral surface flow to the lake. The drawing for this proposal was received on Thursday, April 14, hence as of this writing we have no written review from City Engineer, Glenn Cook. However, Glenn has verbally indicated this method is feasible. Approval should be subject to the forthcoming comments of the city engineer. 2. Applicants are proposing an additional 12" to 24" of fill along the north side of the house for aesthetic purposes. Building Inspector, Tom Jacobs has indicated this wi 11 sti 11 fa 1 1 within the guidelines of fill for the purpose of protection of footings and foundation. Staff Recos endation Approval subject to forthcoming comments of the city engineer. Sump discharge shall be configured so as not to increase drainage to neighboring properties. pr 4.; Date Rec' d_ Fee Receipt Initials CITY OF ORONO GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address !271r, Dnnro Line Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 21-117-23-32-007 Please check one - Is the property abstract or _ X - torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only�- iPlease attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. --------------- - APPLICANT Phone (home) Name Michael Hallpy Homes. Inc. Phone (work) 944-1056 Address Lens Vi,%ing Drive #3R0---------City- Eden Prairie Zip -- ----- j OMER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)471-7343 Name 1Niiliago i k Madeleine S. kernik Phone 211-6512 Address 2715 Pence Lane City Orono zip Date Property Acquired �, -� -- i(month/year ) -----I (do) (do ��ot) also own the adjacent parcels of land. -------_:...------------------------------------------------------- FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use x $200.00 f) Land Alteration X_ Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more X_ Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore X $150.00 Variaric(�/(-,radinr within 75' of lake shore. PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $150.00 Easement Vacation $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $250.00 Rezoning _ $200.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District LR-in Present Use of Property SinE,Ie Family Residential Other (specify) ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: Regrading within 75' of lake shnre to allow for a walkout lower lev.l for a proposed new residential structure Replacement of existine deteriorate!,s staining walls --------------------------------------------------------------------------- RBQUINUb SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners wi*t,' 0' (you can obtain, this list from Hennepin County Department of F. A-603 Government; Cernter 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (i10) pre -addressed to each of the named on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Con3truction plan, if applicable. 6. Plat Map. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your applic- pan is not complete if the above information has not been included. --------------------------- .----------------------------- ---------------- Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date APPLICANTS SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees tn provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. 22 Applicant's signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application And further ,,_Ithorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Cour,ci 1 members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature M� .Z/! Date Applicant must have all submittals into t`n. City offices 25 days before the Panning Commission Meeting. Planning Caau'.Jssion Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants r,:.ct be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Comnis:sor! and Council, and, if an applicant it; unable to attend a ache., led meeting, to please make arrangements to have an authorized agent a; in your place and to advise the Building i Zoning Office of this char_ ,rior to the meeting. 10 PUN DATE 11/24/87 BATCH 002 38 21-117-23 23 0015 PROP ADDR 02760 PHEASANT RD L-2 EER NAME ED►:ARD M MAHONEY ETAL TAXPAYER EDWARD M MAHONEY NAME/ADDR 2760 PHEASANT ROAD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0044 PROP ADDR 02707 WALTERS PORT LA OW3:ER NAME HUBERT D BLUNT ETAL TAXPAYER HUBERT D BLUNT NAME/ADDR 2707 WALTERS PORT LN EXCELSIOR MI 55331 ' 38 21-117-23 23 0048 PROP ADDR O::NER NAME ENNIRONIENTAL PLANNING INC TAXPAYER ENVIROtMENTAL PLANNING INC NAME/ADDR 4530 IDS CENTER 11PLS MN 55402 38 2I-117-23 32 0001 PROP ADDR 02791 PHEASANT RD =41ER NAME ' N A L C SLRO)ET TAXPAYER LE LA1M N SUN NET NAME/ADDR 2791 PHEASANT RD EXCELSIOR KH 55331 38 21-117-23 32 0007 PROP ADDR 02715 PENCE LA OWNER NAME WILLIAM A MERNIK TAXPAYER WILLIAM Z MERNIK NAME/ADDR 2715 PENCE LA EXCELSIOR M1 55331 HENNNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 21-117-23 23 0025 02765 PHEASANT RD STEPHEN L BAKKE ETAL STEPHEN L BAKKE 2765 PHEASANT RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0045 02709 WALTERS PORT LA W M A S K DUN{LEY WILLIAM M A SUSAN K DUNKLEY 2799 WALTERS PORT LANE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0049 D A L UPHOFF DARYL L A LUCY S UPHOFF 2699 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-l'.7-23 32 0002 02795 PHEASANT RD ROYAL J DOSSETT A WIFE ROYAL A SYNNIEVA DOSSETT 2795 PHEASANT ROAD EXCELS102 MN 55331 TOTAL BATCH 002 00013 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 2 38 21-117-23 23 0043 02705 WALTERS PORT LA DGNALD W NELSON ETAL DONUILD W NELSON RT 2 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0046 _r DEAN E TERRY Lo DEAN E TERRY 2710 PENCE LANE ORONO HN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0051 02710 PENCE LA it DEAN E TERRY DEAN E TERRY J tl/ 2710 PENCE LANE ORONO NN 55331 E 38 21-I17-23 32 OOOS 02789 PHEASANT RD - ` • PAUL L POHLE ETAL PAUL L POHLE 2789 PHEASANT RD RR 2 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 • o N i�) A J ti ^` s• •cif ' I lo 23 0 '•9� f' � �� a •:o • "' 22 ro 21 • '� a 20 's •s '' ; Il ( 1 (L W .14 M .01 1 r i 13� 9 • ��. 19 0 �•.'• Vr/ (4i� I .. .�•4 tom. 47 400 Lot 10 •i, p \ X 44 W Z i • ,12 % "ur Q h r PART OF II ^' �• LOT 10 I /q (3) cc I _ a t Bonestroo Otto G Bonestroo. PC Robert W Rotene. PE Joteph C Andefhk. PE Kerth A Gordon. PE RKhard W Foster, PE Dona-d C Burgardt. PE Thomas W Peterton. PE Charm A E,Kstnn MKharl C LyMh. PE leo M Paweltky lames R Ma'and, PE HRian M Olson (� V Rosene 8r"1 a A lemberg. PE E Turner. PE Jerry A Bourdon PE Will A Hanson. PE Kenneth P Andersan on, PE SusM fhsrhn Keith A Ba<hmann. PE Mark A Se,p yRKhard Anderlik & Associates /lent C Olson.Cook. PF GIrM R Cook. PE Thornas E Noyes PE Robert G Sthun¢ht. PE fed K R7 PE MKhaet i Rautmann. PE Robert R Pfefferle, PE David O WtkWa. PE Mark R Rolle. k. - Robert C Rutsek. A t A Thomas E 3• Howard 11 IE' Marron l Wvala. PE Engineers & Architects ( 607 December 15, 1987 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Re: File No. 139-1233 Michael Halley Homes 2517 Pence Lane Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed a plan for the proposed home at 2517 Pence Lane, The plan provides for constructing a walkout to Lake Minnetonka. The construction would involve excavating in the 0 to 75 setback area. The excavation and regrading work proposed on the property would not significantly enhance runoff quality from the site. We would recommend that regrading in the lakeshore area not be allowed. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:li 24 2335 West Highway 36 to St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 U Bones t roo o Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects February 24, 1988 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Jeanne Mabusth Ret 2715 Pence Lane Our File No. 139-1233 Dear Jeanne: Otto G Bonestro0. PE Keith A. Gordon. PE Robert W Ro•rne, PF RKhard W Foster, PE Joseph C Anderkk, PE Donald C Burquctl. PC Bradford A tembe1% PC Jerry A Bourdon. PC RKhard F Turner. P( Mark A Hanwn. PC James C Olson, PL Ted K Field. PC Glenn R Cook. PC Michael t Raulmann. PC Thomas F Noyes. PC Robert R Prefleoe, PF Robert G Schunicnl. P( DhId C) Loskota PE Marvin L Sorvala. PE Tlgmat W Merton, PE Chutes A ErKkson WAhael C Lynch, PE teo M Pawelsky James R Mal„nd. PE Harlan M Olson Kenneth P Anderson, PE Susan M Ebenin Keith A Bachmann, PE Mart A Seep Mark R Rolf%. PE Robert C Ruse%. A 1 A Thomas E Angus. PE stnrvard A Sanford, PE oe � n� FEB 26 1588 S tcoKvie�v �Ie We have reviewed the proposed house plan submittal on the property at 2715 Pence Lane. The plan provides for raising the 1st floor elevation six feet. This willl allow construction of a walkout basement without excavating in the 0-75 feet lakeshore setback area. The builder should provide elevations on the neighboring homes. Raising of the first floor elevation may have a significant visual impact on the neighborhood. The grsding proposed around the walkout shows drainage being directed back towards the house. This will require a storm sewer line to drain the area near the house. The direction of runoff from the site will not be significantly affected by the filling. The builder should provide plans for the retaining wall replacement and the quantity of fill material brought in. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSEN, ANDERLIK S ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:ci 01 233S West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota SS113 • 612-636-4600 a Bonestroo a Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects March 17, 1985 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Attn: Mr. Tom Jacobs Re: 139 - 1233 Hallev Const. 2715 Pence Lane Dear Tom: CMo G Bonrsvm, PE Kenn A CKsrdon, PE Thomas W Pelrrvm. PE Chants A EIKUf . Rooers W Rosene. PE RKhard W fourt. PE MKhael C Lywh. PE Leo M Pasvelfky Joseph C Anderhk. PE Donald C 8uryardt. PE James R Matand, PE Harlan M orstsn Bradford A Lemberg. PE Jerry A Bourdon, PE Kenneth P Andrrson, PE Susan M Ebrrkn RKnard E Turner. PC Mark A Hanlon. PE ",th A BXhmsnn. PE Mark A Snp Jamrf C Olson. PE led K held, PE Mark R Rolf'. PE Glenn R Cook. PE MK nae1 T RafKmann, PE Robert C Russell. AIA Thomas E Noyes. PE Robyn R Pleffetle. PE Thomas C Angus. PE Robert G khunKM. PE David O I nskop. PC Howard A Sanford, PE Marvin L Sotwla, PE S i ezN9 Rev"ek) — F/N,t/ C. 0 M-n.,4 We have reviewed the plan submitted for the property at Pence Lane. The property owner proposes to construct a walkout basement wit, a berm between the home and Lake Minnetonka. The property owner proposes to place a storm sewer pipe to Grain water from the walkout to the lake. We would recommend that the inlet structure contain a sump for collection of debris. The outlet should be rip rapped and the restoration within 75 feet of the lakeshore area should be completed immediately after construction. If you have any questions please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. ezo-,� Glenn R. Cook CRC:df 912f 2335 West Highway 36 9 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 9 612-636-4600 r Otto G Bonesiroo. PE Keith A Gordon, PE Thomas W Peterson, ►E Charles A Erl(kson/ Bonestroo Robert W Rosene. PE Richard W Folt f. PE Mr(hael C Lynch. PE Leo M Pawelsk/ Joseph C AndenJr, PE Donald C Burgar:7, PF James R Maland. PE Harlan M Olson Rosene Bradford A temberq PE Richard E Turner, PE Jerry A Bourdon, PE Mark A Hanson. PF Kenneth P Anderson, PE Keith A Pa(hmann, PE Susan M Ebellm 1dJrk A Seip M� Anderlik & James C Olson. PE Glenn R COOY, PF K Field. Mxhael T RJulutmann, PE R Roles. PGlennMK Robe Robed C Russrk. A I A Associates Thomas E Noyes. PE Robert G Schunr(hl. PE Robert R Plefferk, PE oa.w O losYota. PF Thomas E Anyus. PE Howard A Sanford. PE Marvin t Sorvala. PE Englneen 3 Architects April 20, 1988 City of Orono Box 66 Pe v i e k Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Re: File No. 139-1233 2715 Pence Lane Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the information submitted fcr storm water drainage on the property at 2715 Pence Lane. The owner's engineer indicated that additional detail will be provided as a part of the building plan. Hydraulics information submitted indicates the need for a 450 GPM pump. This is somewhat larger that r average 10 GPM sump pump. Installation of the system below the basement floor is proposed. We would recommend venting of the installation to the roof and that it have a sealed access cover. The system as proposed will provide for discharge of the storm water in an ac- ceptable manner. There are possibilities for failure of the system if good maintenance procedures are not followed. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:1i 24 2335 West Highway 36 or St. Paul. Minnesota 55113 9 612-636-4600 One Southwest Crossing 11095 Vikuw Drive - Suite .w Eden Pr.lirit; S.S3 March 7, 1988 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building b Zone Administrator, City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Application #1233 - Conditb-)nal Use Permit/Variance 2715 Pence Lane, Orono Dear Ms. Mabusth: We are submitting, per your request, the following items: 1) Approximate partial elevations of the adjacent on either side of 2715 Pence Lane. 2) a. Copies of photographs showing the existing stacked concrete block retaining wall. b. Copies of typical boulder retaining wall detail. New retaining wall will follow existing retaining wall location with the exception of the stairs, which will be located per site plan. 3) imported fill estimates per the excavation contrac- tor, as indicated below: a) Sand for use below new concrete floor slabs inside proposed structure -approx. 350 cu.yds. b) Fill to provide foundation protection and front yard drainage as indicated on site plan - -approx. 130 cu.yds. c) The excavation of the proposed new residence will generate approximately 582 cu. yds. which will be used in the front yard area. 4) Sketch from civil engineer showing lakeshore yard drain locations and typical detail. Sincer ae . Halle Y President MAH/bb Enclosures File: 4-10-1 X1 0 ( � 11 /v.T•Giti • • / 1.��. JOyb�• \ 4, •✓) S'wrP AeeA .2736 F- 96 ', D�strMebE 9 aA F,� r @ il% t.rr ane , ' \ Off ar. u�r.t t it ave- ai n AL'_ it i •rGN N�.J t ��• MJNUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD DECEMBER 21, 1987 #1230 JOHNSON CONTINUED It was noted that the most affected neighbor +-he west has submitted a letter in support of the propo.,al. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. Bellows suggested tabling the application pending the revised survey. Kelley stated he would recommend approval subject to an equal amount of hardcover being removed. Hanson and Cohen stated they reviewed the site and talked to applicant and concurredwith Kelley recommending approval. Kelley asked applicants if they would be willing to remove more of the patio if they indeed do not use it. Susan Johnson stated that she has to review it further, however, she intends to reduce the patio size to provide for more garden area and would be agreeable to reducing the patio more if it works out aestetically. It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Hanson, to recommend approval as proposed subject to concurrent removal of equal (or more) hardcover within the 75-250' area. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. Mabusth advised applicants that staff must receive the revised survey indicating the areas of hardcover to be removed prior to scheduling their application before the Council. 11233 CHAEL HALLEY HOMES, INC. PBNCE LANE C ITIOMAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 8:16-8:27 The Affidavit were noted. of Publication and Certificate of Mailing This application involves a conditional use permit and variance to allow land alterations within 75 feet of the shoreline. 1. Replacement of retaining walls and steps. 2. Alteration of the lakeshore bank to provide a more natural, consistent setting with the proposed walk -out design house. 7 0 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD DECEMBER 21, 1987 #1233 MICHAEL HALLEY HOMES, INC. Michael Halley of Michael Halley Homes, Inc. was present for this matter and stated they have entered into a agreement with the Mernik's to purchase 2715 Pence Lane. They are interested in removing the existing structure and building a new Noma on the property. He noted the two adjacent neighbors' concern with preserving the many trees on the lot. He explained that in order to build the proposed walk -out house and not disturb the 0-75' area, they would have to raise thg house 9' by bringing in fill, which would be very difficult and the neighbors would not favor. He noted that the neighbors could not attend the meeting but will be submitting letters in support of their proposal. Bellows noted 1 third lternative of building a house with a basement and no .-.out. Mr. Halley stated f r,.... a marketing standpoint, they would not build a house without a walkout. Planning Commission unanimously agreed with Bellows' third option. Mabusth noted for Planning Commission members and Mr. Halley that bringing fill would most likely require a conditional use permit. Mr. 6 Mrs. Mernik were present for this matter. Mrs. Mernik noted that the property as it exists has a drainage problem. Bellows explained that the creation of a walkout 1res not solve drainage problems. The drainage and allou_ng a walkout are two totally separate issues. She felt that the E oposed extent of grading within the 0-75' should not be allowed. Mr. Halley indicated to the Planning Commission that if a walkout design was denied, the sale of the property to him would not occur. There were no other comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to recommend denial of the application as proposed based on insufficient hardship. Motion, Ayes 6, Nrys 0. It was noted that repair of the retaining walls by the owners would require a separate application by the owner as current applicant is Michael Halley Homes, True. 8 r MINtIT-` "— THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEP.TING HELD MARCH 21, 1986 11223 WALDRON CONTINUED Mr. Waldron felt there were no other proposals that would work for them, therefore requested Planning Commission to make their recommendation at this time. It was rnrved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to recommend denial of the 3' excavation cut in the lakeshore yard and 0-75' hardcover variance; and recommend approval of the average lakeshore setback variance to construct the deck as proposed. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 1. Brown voted nay. Motion carried. i1233\ MICHAEL HALLEY HOMES INC. ��ENCE LANE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE AMENDED APPLICATION - SECOND REVIEW Architect Larry Kollmeyer Michael Halley Homes for this was present representing matter. Jacobs explaii.rd the request for a conditional use permit and variance to reconstruct an existing retaining wall within 75' of the lake; and install a drainage pine within 75' of *ne lake. Chairman Kelley read the City Engineer's recommendation of this proposal. It was noted that the proposal includes constructing a walkout basement with a berm between the home and the lake. Bellows felt that They -,pre being asked to solve a problem (through a vi iance to the ordinanc( i that is being created by the proposed de yn. Chairman Kelley asked Mr. Kollmeyer w at the hardship was to support granting the variance and conditional use permit for th= drainage pipe? Mr. Kollmeyer &.:i !,ct end ,-ate any specific hardship, but questic,ieA wr,y a drainage pipe buried below the surface of the yard wr�ri+d be % problem? Bellows explained that ii, ou met pipe to the lake is not in the spirit of Oren, -,totection of disturbing the lakeshore and water quality. She fur*her explained that the proposal is creating an uratural dr.. nage situation, a solution affecting the 0-75' lakeshore yard being created by the desire for a walkout basement. Mr. Kollmeyei felt a 6-10" pipe would have an minimal physical effect to the lakeshore. 8 w MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 21, 1988 #1233 MICHAEL HALLEY HOMES CONTINUED Chairman Kelley stated he is in favor of restoring the retaining walls but opposed to allowing the drainage pipe. Johnson agreed that the pipe would not have a significant impact and would support the proposal. Brown agreed with Kelley finding it would be setting a precedent by allowing a drainage pipe. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to recommend denial of the CUP/variance for the drainage pipe within the 75' lakeshore; and recommend approval of the CUP/variance to reconstruct the retaining walls within the 75' lakeshore subject to no additional hardcover incurred by retaining walls. Johnson felt that the revised plan was a much better plan than originally submitted. He suggested that applicant could direct the drainage to the rear of the house instead of directly to the lake. Mabusth agreed suggesting the wetland area. Mr. Kollmeyer stated that the wetland is outside of the property. Chairman Kelley states he did not feel this was a good design for the property because eventually grading of the the lakeshore bank would be desired. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 1. Johnson voted nay. Motion carried. #1247 ROBERT POSTHUMUS RECORD LOT NO. 40 - BIG ISLAND VARIANCE SECOND REVIEW Applicant was not present for this matter. Jacobs explained the request f, _ -:ide setback variance to construct a lake i,ome; and ;.fiance and conditional use permit to install a well within 75' of the lakeshore. It was noted that the restricted septic site affects the well and house location, therefore requiring the need for the variances and conditional use permit. The hardships being the lot size and septic location. 9 RVA hevelopment Engineering, P.A. 8110 Eden Road Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344 (612) 941-3031 April 13, 1988 Mr Gene Cook, P.E. Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik h Associates 2335 W. Hwy 36 Roseville, Mn. 55113 RE: 2715 Pence Lane, Orano Dear Mr. Cook: r�E�,,Erl U Enclosed are the drainage calculations for the proposed home at 2715 Pence Lane. We propose to build a trench drain around the walkout areo which will collect the storm water runoff into a sump tank Inside the home. The sump tank will have two sump pumps, one as a backup, sized to pump a minimum of 450 GPM. A backup gas generator will be installed in the event of power failure during a large storm event. The pump will discharge onto the lawn with a splash plate (rip rap) to dissipate the energy to prevent erosion. Details of the pump, sump tank and generator will be provided to the building inspectors by the Architect, Mr Larry Kollmeyer, when taking out the building permit. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, Jonathan: L. Frtraci, P.E. DO'S f-geP 'TOP GOJ R+ l.fivP-l.--, w s-TrNodw- KaWs 4 aaU ei .o V 5P� yd^� � I5 MOB - or 'ENE mac. j� Dont's ItVEKT IG/`t V\lh.L. yTR;,1GTU IW�L�Y VAO�`6�-� i Arleka incorporated Landscape Architects Contractors • i12 038 0000 I Loo� �.dt AR 11 1 AOL., A A3' M :r tm i - --- --- - 1. _ 1 _. t�.r: +mot �i rls�'f ° w �� � ;tz ���' � ,� . o- -- -- ._... � _ PbG4 Pd2 -Q,J 0 tv -1 Lo-C ATr- dm AP6. 900.1 To 9bl.1 - A*a-b edtc& Ili 15 r- e -ku r. NOW -tz v 1:r�tf ARM--- 7a a R . - NW - e I. I OL e adrar Va. t • a. GfAfJ� A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 i SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 AND PER SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 APPROVING A COND TIONAL USE PERMIT FILE i1233 WHEREAS, Michael A. Halley, President of Michael Halley Homes, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 2715 Pence Lane within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Carman Bay Heights, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the applicant has mad application to the City of Orono to permit the reconstruction of the retaining walls within the lakeshore protected area requiring a variance to Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.55, Subd. 8 that, would prohibit land alteration or permanent structures within the lakeshore protected area and a conditional use permit per Section 10.03, Subd. 19 required for the land alteration and reconstruction of the existing retaining walls. In conjunction with this land use application, the applicant has also presented building plans for the construction of a new residence on the property. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of - 0, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File t1233. 2. The property is located in the LR-1B, Lakeshore Residen--ial Zoning District requirinq a minimum of 1 acre in area. 3. The property is approximately 41,148 s.f. or .94 acre in area. 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on March 21, 1988. and recommended appr--7al of the variances to Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Sect 10.55, Subd. 9 and a conditional use permit per Section 3, Subd. 10 as proposed based on the following Findings: a) The proposed recon ztruct ion of the retaining walls will result in an overall reduction of hardcover within the lakeshore protected area. Page ; of 4 b) The c!:cisting retaining walls are in an unsafe and hazardous condition and must be replaced to assure t:,e safe use of the lakeshore yard. c) The walls were damaged in the severe rai storm of July 23, 1987. The state of deterioration was rit created by a lack of ma4ntenance or upkeep. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and du not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; t:iat granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air i,or pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighbc-rin'4 properties; woulO not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right -)f the appli- cant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6. The City Ccuncil finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the reconstruction of 17etaining walls located within the lakeshore protected area that were damaged by the Jul 23, 1987 rain storm will not be detrii.e,:tal to .he health, safety or g-neral welfare of the public, would not — versely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, JRDBR AND CONDITIONS Based upon one of nore of t,ie -ibove findings, the Orono City C. hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.. , 3ubd. 2 6 Section 10.55, Subd. 8 and a conditional use permit per Section 10.03, Subd. 19 to allow the reconstruction of retaining walls within the lakeshorc protected area ir, conjunction with construction of a new prim `oal resider subject to the following conditions: 1. A separate building p,-rm.it is requi.-%d for the construction of new retaining walls and .access steps. Steps are limited to 4' maximum width and all Structural hardcover is to be maintained at 537 s.f. (72 s.f. for stairs and 465 s.f. For 155 lineal feet of boulder wall). 2 of 4 2. Applicant shall provide a soil erosion plan at the time of application for a building permit for either the retaining wall or the new residence for all land alteration activities associated with new construction. 3. All activities involving the transport of fill to the builL'ing site shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM on weekdays only (Monday through Friday). 4. Applicant and/or future owner of the property is hereby advised that the City will not approve any further encroachment of the lakeshore protected area with future requests to alter the existing elevations. 5. .Authorities granted by t-is resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (April 25, 1989). b. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a vice -tIon of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any au'_^ority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his successors and assigns, here7v agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 25th day of April, 1988. ATTEST: Dorothy M. HallLn, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Property Owner(s) Po ge 3 of 4 To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members n.F�� 2 51 . City Administrator Bernhardson From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: April 20, 1988 Subject: #1244 Dale C. Palm, 1710 Shadywood Road - Variance - Final Review List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Applicant's Letter Exhibit B - Original Staff Mewo Exhibit C - Hardcover Site Plan Exhibit D - Planning Commission Exhibit E - Council Notice Exhibit F - Denial Resolution and Sketch Approved with Original Application Minutes of 3/14/88, 3/28/88 Staff has the follo,ing comments regarding the statements and claims made .y the applicant in their recent submittal. The staff member that accepted the second variance application of the Palms was very candid and admitted at the filing that the application could have a slim chance of being approved because of the precedent setting aspect. If Council would review the original site plan (Exhibit C) that designated the hazdrover areas to be removed as a result of the new construction, these areas were already accounted for in the final hardcover calculations. The family room has been setback 2' and is not in line with the remaining front/lakeside of the house. Council may consider allowing the bulkhead dour to remain consisting of 41 s.f. for d total hardcover within the 0-75' setback area at 1,139 s.f. or 17.3% (Total hardcover adjusted to account for 52 s.f.. of structural hardcover not installed). Planning Commission moved to maintain hardcover within the 0-75' setback area at no greater than 17.5%, such action would be consistant with the Planning Commissions recommendation. The applicants make reference to neighbors that have approved the proposed keeping of the detached garage scheduled for removal. Staff must advise that throughout this review, one of the neighbors has kept in close contact with s*aff in order to he assured that the garage was going to be removed and that if there was any sign on the part of the Council to allow such structure to remain, that the individual would like the chance to either appear before Council or submit something for the public record tit, would state this position of opposition to maintaining such stricture. We have received no other written confirmation that neighbors are in support of the maintainance of the detached structure. Zoning File #1244 Page 2 Applicants' proposal would result in a total hardcover of 1,139 s.f. or 17.3% within the 0-75' setback area and within the 75-250' setback area, a total of 4,425 s.f. or 43% of hardcover. Planning Commission recommended in their motion that hardcover not exceed 29% or 2,980 s.f. within the 75- 250' setback area. The enclosed denial resolution has been amended so that the completion dates originally established for the removal of the non-structural and structrual hardcover by April 1.5, 1988 is changed to June 1, 1988, The resolution has not been amended to allow the bulkhead door on the 0-75' setback area. Staff wi1'. await Council's directive. April 15, 1988 Dear Orono Council Members, O Ca, E 0 APR i We would truly appreciate your consideration of allowing us to keep our quaint old garage. We realize that we foolishly allowed our contractor to make decisions for us in regard to the remodeling of this beautiful old home including additions and removals. There has been many painful disappointments, long agonizing hardships, and now several lawsuits as a result of this mistake we are now faced with the hardship of the removal of this good storage structure. After owning the house for over two years we are finally enjoying living in it. However, we realize that we really need the extra space for storage and a sound and wind buffer from the busy County Road 19. It also allows a certain amount of privacy. After attending the building committee meeting and hearing their hardline position, I went out and surveyed the situation and took a hard look at what we would do with all the stuff in the old garage. I can have a garage sale but so much of the new stuff we need -- the lawn equipment, the lawn furniture, the boating and swimming gear, fishing gear, the snow blower, boat canvasses. Because of the water level we could not build a basement that most home owners have for much of this type of storage. The original cabin basement is smell and wet. The building committee seemed to take a hardline negative to our request. When we first approached the city, a building staff person felt we had a very good case. We realize now we have not made our case clear to the planning commission; instead relied on professionals to represent and influence us. 1. Because of the building restrictions, the new garage barely fits our two cars. We are both career people and need two cars. 1. We need it to store the lawn and garden equipment, snow - blowers, lawn chairs, tables, fishing and eater equipment. In the winter the fishing boats, docks and etc. 3. We need it for a wind and noise barrier from the busy highway. 4. It is a unique structure and with a little restoration such as cedar shakes and decorated with the Victorian look as the house that will add charm and value to the neighborhood. 5. Without this extra storage there will be junk piled around outside that will distract from the neighborhood. Orono Council Members April 15, 1988 Page -2- 6. As far as the hard^over issue, we removed more hardcover on the lake side than there was originally. We uncovered sidewalks 20 feet on the north side and 30 feet on the west side (2 X F0 = 100 sq.ft) not originally included in the hardcover estimate. Our builder set the family room back 2 X 26 = 52 sq.ft. Our understanding was the 10 ft. addition and the 16 ft. replacement, would be even with existing lake front structure. 7. The garage hardcover in question is in the extreme northwest corner of our lot. Because of the lot contour all drainage is to the street and none drains to the lake. Therefore, there would be no improvement on ecology with the removal of the garage. 8. We have spoken to our neighbors and none have voiced an objection. They too enjoy the privacy the garage gives and can sympathize with our problem of lake storage. In Summary. As we have stated, the hardship to us personally with the lack of storage is important, but there are other issues to the community and to the ecology. 1.) The drainage to the street with or without the garage does not improve the ecology. 2.) The noise barrier to our property and the community is an important factor. 3.) Privacy to our property will be impaired with removal of this building. 4.) To enhance the community we will restore the building with cedar shakes and siding to equal the quality of the remodelled building. 5.) Improve the lot acceptance of moisture, we will install red brick set in a sand base driveway and turn around. This will improve the ecology by accepting moisture and not drain to the lake. We thank you for taking the time to consider our request and look forward to a f>,vorable decision. Sincerely, Dale Palm ` S 1 C<6� � N rearaw �D gy O w ¢y2 arr� E A A93:re• I J p,• ere J/ t irQust .N h 3 e , i� • , E . 95.0' SouFh l;r+e d L0i 13 +>"l re V� EI v OF fiN� 5 rFE7 "4AAJ 67EE'7%N G /7. 5 % o -,� 1 gAvtD CAD V t12 ccrract representation of a survey of the boundaries of that part of Lot 11 g Sout the South::lying est corner of the North 14 feet of said Lot; tt:,nce South 87 degrees mint nd char part of Lot 12, lying Northerly of a line drawn or?}� line of Lot t3, all in Shad wood an Pirellcl with and distant 71 'in the ' rn file and cf record in the office of the Register toftDeeds e Cruinyand fornepin said County oft thcrec'r. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. Plat of `Shady Hood- COFFIN i GRONDEPG. INC. � �2�rtitoYE •.C/ A^ 14 _ U To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: February 11, 1988 Subject: #1244 Dale C. Palm, 1710 Shadywood Road - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-lC, � acre minimum lot size Application - Involves the request of the applicant to keep structural and non-structural hardcover scheduled for removal as a condition of approval for variance application #1006, approved by Council on 3/10/86. Applicant has completed the proposed improvements set forth in the previous land use application. Staff has refused to issue a permanent certificate of occupancy because of the applicant/owner's refusal to remove the required hardcover. Applicant has filed a variance application for reconsideration by the City. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - 0-75' area maintain 41 s.f. or .6% of hardcover for a total of 1,191 s.f. or 18% (approved 17.5% or 1,1t501P s.f. with recent variance application)! 75-250' area request to maintain 1,445 s.f. or 14% of existing hard- cover for a total of 4,425 s.f. or 43% of hardcover (approved 2,9)f0 s.f. or 29%). List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Applicant's Addendum Exhibit E - Resolution Approving Application No. 1006 Exhibit F - Site Plan Approved With Application No. 1006 Exhibit G - Survey - 1/13/86 Exhibit H - Partial Packet of Application. No. 1006 Review of Application No. 1006 - Applicant was allowed to improve his home in exchange fur removal of existing non-structural and structural hardcover on the property. Review Exhibits F and G, the variance was conditioned on the removal of the existing detached garage (non -conforming structure) and other hardcover, paving adjacent to County Road 19, and other non-structural and structural hardcover within the 0-75' setback area. Council approved, within the 0- 75' setback area, 17.5% hardcover, and, within the 75-250' setback area, 29% total hardcover. Review Exhibit H, partial packet copied from original application no. 1006, the exhibits include the application signed by Mrs. Palm, the Planning Commission and Council minutes noting who was present at those meetings, and copies of the notices sent to '_he applicant. Zoning File #1244 February 11, 1988 Page 2 of 3 In response to Mr. Palm's comments, it is unfortunate that Mr. Lindner, the builder, made such claim to the applicant as we did not find Mr. Lindner as naive as this would suggest, but once again neither Oid staff ever receive such questions of the Palms during the review. As for the safety issue, the Palms sere approved for a 15'x)5' backup apron which would allow them to safely Enter onto Shadywood Road. This type of paving pattern appears quite consistent with the surrounding properties on Shadywood Road. Staff cannot remember a variance for hardcover being approved that was based solely on the need to provide parking for many quests. Such temporary parking could be provided by grassed areas on the property. Staff would suggest that in reviewing the site plan (Exhibit F), there is not enough paved backing -out area from the garage and would suggest maybe expanding on that to allow greater maneuverability. A minimum of 20' should be provided for at least a 20-22' length extending from the garage. The attached garaye, a non -conforming structure, is located 4.7' off the street right-of-way and approximately 2' from the side lot line to the north. Applicant's claim that the garage is absolutely essential for storage would indicate to those of us involved in the original application that there was really no serious thought to the previous agreement, an agreement that was set out in a formal resolution that was signed by the applicants. The larger, improved house and the garage would create a cluttered and densely developed look in comparing current pattern of development. The storm door shelter referred to by applicant can be se, Item A on Exhibit F. If this access door to the house is essential ano cannot be feasibly removed, then Planning Commission may consider allowing the structure to stay and may also ask for additional driveway to be removed. Staff Recommendation - To deny applicant's request to retain the detached garage within the street yard and existing paving adjacent to Shadywood Road referred to as driveway apron and to allow the storm door shelter to remain based on the following findings: 1. Applicant participated throughout the entire review and received notice of all final action culminating in the signing of a formal resolution whereby applicant agree.] to make the necessary removals. 2. The total variance of 43% hardcover within the 75-250' setback area is excessive for this size property and would not be consistent with previous Council action with similar applications. 3. The applicant hac not prezent ed adequate hardship tc, satisfy the current hardcover application. Zoning File #1244 February 11, 1988 Page 3 of 3 This denial is subject to the following conditions: 1. Detached garage and apron area, not included with approved driveway entrance, to be removed by April 15, 1988.. . ? 2. Applicant is further advised that the 15'xl5' apron may be installed and to work with staff regarding a more feasible approach and exit entrance to garage that would expand upon the paving providing better maneuverability but in no case can hardcover exceed 30% within the 75-250' setback area. 3. Plannin Commission would also have to approve the variance for the additional hardcover within the 0-75', which would now total 18.1% over the original approved 17.5% with application no. 1006. Additional Coments and Planning Commission Recommendation March 4, 1988 The Planning Commission listened to the oral comments of both Mrs. Palm and the Palm's attorney. Members advised that they could find no change in the findings from the first land use review or additional, new hardships that were not already covered in the first review and advised the applicant of the dangers of setting such a precedent if they were to approve the current request in light of the conditions of the first approval. Planning Commission did not accept the options proposed by staff which would allow the bulk -head door to remain and to possibly allow additional paving not to exceed 30% within the 75-250' setback area providing greater maneuverability. Planning Commission basically wanted the conditions of the first review to remain. Planning Commission Recommendation - To deny applica— 's variance application that sought to retain the de-.3ched garaqe, bulk -head door and existing paving referred to as driveway apron adjacent to Shadywood Road, based on tie following fin6ings: 1. Applicant participated throughout the entire review and received notice of all final action culminating in the signing of a formal resolution whereby applicant agreed to make the necessary removals. 2. A total variance of 43% hardcover within the 75-250' setback area is excessive for this size property and would not be consistent with previous Councii action with similar applications nor is it consistent with pattern of development of adjacent neighborhood. 3. The applicant has not present;?d adequate hardship to satisfy the current hardcover application. Zoni.ig File- #1244 Mari 4, 1988 Page 4 of 4 This denial is subject to the following conditions: 1. All hardcover scheduled for removal with application #1006 as set forth in resolution 41936 is to be totally removed by April 15, 1988. 2. Applicant is further advised that the 151x15' apron approved in the original application can be relocated on the property to provide greater maneuverability but in no case shall the hardcover within the 75-250' area exceed 29%. The enclose.? resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission, recommendation. _ 6; 1-. 4 r o/ Al µ A/fE.i"O&F J .e-r�Lill By 04JN0R- VrE 1 _ _ !7 �.� poet /Re M �2�rvtoYE -- E,l�s��h9 /iQusc �rcr� ` 1 a �76 4� � Ear 95.0 rl,P51' rc' 'a o,-A Gne or" 13 � r, `�CE�zvaL OF /r�y►►5 L MA a BE DPT CVV -L Su&1eGT '7-0 �. /'►t45ff77N& /7.5/0 0-7;, ' 4A1eDG'flV �`� R ccrroct representat. nn of a survey of the boundaries of that part of Lot 11 ly.i: v Sout L , •'v' the Southwest corner of the North 14 feet of said Lot; thence South 87 degrees 27 mint; � y;t . Z Q nd that part of Lot 12, lying Northerly of a limo drawn parallel with and distant 71.2 ^rly lino of Lot 13, all in Shadywood, an addition to the County of Hennepin in the Tow c•n file and of record in the office of the Register of Leeds in and for said County of j S Z•-• thereon. It does not purpc,rt to show any other improvements or encrc••ictments. �. • plat of "Shad)- good" COF[•'IN a GRO!rliEtG, INC. ._--- --- \ � . 19 -4(41NUTES OF THE RRGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 14, /.�1244 ALE C. PALM -1,710 )rhADYWOOD ROAD VARrANCB DENIAL RESOLUTION Acting City Administrator Gerhardson stated that the applicants could not attend this meeting and have requested the application be: tabled at this time. 1988 It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to to}le Application #1.244. Moitlon, Ayes 5, Nnys 0. #1246 WALTER WHITE 1100 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOUTH PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION RB£OT.UTION /2380 Mr. 6 Mrs. Walter White were present for this matter. Acting City Administrator Gerhardson explained the proposed two lot division -nf a 25+ acre homestead parcel in a rural area. The proptity is 3ewered and will have a shared access. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember to adopt Resolution #2380 approving the Preliminar; division as proposed. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. OSTZ BUI LDERS , INC . /CLBMBW C . KROLL 60/100 STUBBS BAY ROAD ROAD NAME REQUEST It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Mayor Grabek, to approve the plr,-- road name of "Christine Drive" for Betz Builders :nc.„ lement , Kroll. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. ONYOR' S RBPOPm: APPOINTMENT 7P PLetNNING Cu mIS071)n CHAIR I-► O V't^E CHAIR Mayor Grabek reviewed recommendation to re-aprnint Charles Kelley as Chair and l+.aureen Bellows as Vice Chair to the Plannin, Commission due to •,t-e fact that the balance of the metaners have served a ors! im.1 arount of time or the Commissic,: _ Plan- -9 Commissioner Coh stated the r#-.( ommendati.on was mo— 3ble to the Plannina Commis ion. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, se, ti-.4ed by ccuncilmembcr Peterson, to appoint Charles Kc fly Chair and -'Aureen Bellows as Vice Chair of the t ..rnning Commi-0 from Marc. '9-8b to March 1989 Motion, Ayes 5, NA) 4 IC MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 28, 1988 #1223 WALDRON CONTINUED Mr. Waldron explained that he extended a solid pipe from the outlet of his rain gutters to the edge of the lakeshore bank in order tc remove the roof run-off from his yard area and avoid a recurrence of the major erosion caused by saturation of the soil at the top of the bank, which was recommended to be done as an emergency measure after the storm by the HCD. Councilmember Sime felt that this action was justified in this emergency situation. Ar-i-t nt Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained staff's re. -ndation that the drain tiles directing roof run - of t s,c the lawn to the bank be allowed to remain in place: 'I inding that the impact of roof run -of f on a short yard area becoming saturating and causing the bank to slump is equal to the degradation of lake quality by roof run-(.)ff going directly to a pipe to the lake. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, to allow the pipe to remain per staff recommendation. Motion failed for lack of a second. It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to deny the allowing the drain pipe to remain and require to to be removed. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 1. Councilmember Sime voted nay. Motion carried. Mr. Waldon was advised to work with staff to come up with other options to solve the roof run-off problem. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Petersci, to table Application #1223 pending adoption of a formal resolution to be drafted by staff. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 11244 DALE C. PALM 1710 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to table this natter until the April 25, 1988 Council meeting per applicants request. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 5 fl- APPLICATION NO. 1244 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 4-1-88 ----------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Mr. & Mrs. Dale C. Palm COPIES: 1710 Shadywood Road Wayzata, MN 55391 ----------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: Amendment/Variance ----------------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: 3-28-88 VOTE: 4 For Against COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION: Your amendment/variance application has been tabled at your request for the April 25, 1988 meeting of the Council. Please see that ycur new submittal information is received by this office no later than April 13, 1988. Council has advised that they will act on Application 1244 at their April 25, meeting, as your property is currently in violation of the conditions of Resolution 1936. If you are unable to attend the meeting please see that an authorized representative is present in your place. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION DENYING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 FILE NO. 1244 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, pursuant to State Statutes 412 et. seq. and 462 et. seq. the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted Zoning Regulations for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; and WHEREAS, Dale C. Palm (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 1710 Shadywood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: That part of Lot 11 lying Southerly of the following described line: beginning at the Southwest corner of the North 14' of said lot; thence South 87 degrees, 27 minutes East to the shore of Crystal Bay, Lake Minnetonka; and that part of Lot 12 lying Northerly of a lire drawn parallel with and distance 71.2 feet Northerly, measured at right angles from the Southerly line of Lot 13, all in Shadywood an additior to the County of Hennepin in the Township of Orono according to the official plat thereof on file and of record in the office of Registrar of Deeds in and for said County of Hennepin, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the :.ity for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow 41 square feet or 0.6% of existing structural hardcover to remain within the 75-250' setback area and 1,445 square feet or 14% of non-structural and structural hardcover to remain within the 75-250' setback area, such hardcover areas were originally scheduled for removal as a condition of approval of a previous variance application approved by the Council on March 10, 1986 and set forth in Orono Resolution No. 1936; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the written reports by the City staff; thc.> unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission; and the written and oral comments of the applicant and legal counsel. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby denies Dale C. Palm's application for variances for the property described above based upon one or more of the following findings of fact concerning this property: Conclusion of Findings of Application #1006 and Current Application 1. This application was reviewed as Zoninq File 01244. Pagce 1 cif 6 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL N 0. 2. The property is 16,840 square feet in area or 0.39 acres and has an average width of approximately 90 feet. 3. The City reviewed an earlier application, reviewed as Zoning File #1006, that involved setback and hardcover variances allowing a structural addition within the 0-75' setback area and additional non- structural and structural hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. 4. Orono Resolution #1936, the resolution that approved the variances sought in Application #1006, listed the following findings as reasons for granting approval: a) The applicant proposes to remove existing structural hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback area so that the net increase in the C-75' setback area is 50 square feet or 0.7%. Council granted approval of new structural expansion within the 0-75' setback area based on that condition. b) The attached garage, extended driveway and backup apron can be constructed such that hardcover will not exceed 30% in the 75- 250' setback zone. Council granted approval of the new attached garage addition within the 75-250' setback area because it was to replace an existing garage scheduled for removal. The additional hardcover created by the expanded driveway was to be ,hatched with the removal of existing driveway area adjacent tQ Shadywood Road. Council based their approval of the improvements on the matching removal of existing hardcover. c) The existing detached garage is located 2 feet from the north side property line and 4.7 feet from the Shadywood Road right-of- way and is considered a non -conforming structure. d) The City found no adequate hardships presented to justify granting of a hardcover increase in the 0-75' setback zone and applicant agreed to remove existing structural and non-structural hardcover within the 0-75' setback area to off -set the increase proposed with the additions. Applicant never suggested any problem with removing the existing hardcover at the time of the first review. Page 2 of 6 C'it.vy, of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5. Applicant has cited in an addendum included with the current application, referenced as Exhibit A, the following reasons why he feels the hardcover scheduled for removal must remain: a) Applicant's builder advised that applicant could seek an amendment of the original conditions of the approving resolution at some point in the future and that after he had lived in the house for a year he realized how essential those improvements were to the use and enjoyment of the house. Applicant had received all notices of the Planning Commission and Council action after each meeting and was fully aware of the intent of the City regarding this application. Applicant had signed off on the resolution agreeinq to the removal of the specific areas of hardcover. b) Applicant claims that it would create a safety hazard to remove the additional paved area adjacent to Chadywood Road and that it provides additional on -site parking. The City has provided the applicant with a turn -around on his property, thereby eliminating the need to back out onto Shadywood Road. Additional parking for visitors or guests can be provided within ttie grassed areas of the property. c) Applicant contends that the detached garage is desparately needed for storage and that it must remain. Once again, it would appear that the applicant entered into an agreement with the City without any serious thought as to '-he consequences. A larger, improved house and the detached oarage would create a cluttered and densely developed look in comparing current pattern of development within the neighborhood. d) Applicant claims the bulk -head door/storm door shelter is needed for emergency accesses to the house and for certain repair and maintenance activities. Once again, this should have been addressed with the original review. Theme is interior access to the basement area via the principal residence. 6. At the Planning Commission meeting of February 16, 1908, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to deny the current application based on the following findinqs: Faqe 3 of 6 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. a) Applicant participated throughout the entire review and received notice of all final action culminating in the signing of a formal resolution whereby applicant agreed to make the necessary removals. b) The total variance of 43% hardcover within the 75-250' setback area is excessive for this size property and would not be consistent with previous Council action with similar applications. c) The applicant has not presented adequate hardships to satisfy the current hardcover application. 7. The property at its present level of hardcover does not conform to the current development pattern of the neighborhood. 8. The granting of the hardcover variances now proposed by the applicant would set an adverse precedent and limit Council's consideration of similar applications in the future. 9. The intent of this application is contrary to the objectives and goals of the Orono Comprehensive Plan. 10. The values of adjacent properties will be adversely affected if the detached garage structure is allowed to remain on the property. 11. Tc approve the application as proposed, the City wuuld be asked to approve total hardcover variances of 18% within the 0-75' setback area and 43% within the 75-250' setback area. Such an action would establish a negative precedent in the future development of the LR-lC zoning district, the standards and intent of hoth the City Zoning Code and Community Management Plan would no longer have any effect if the City establishes a precedent of approving variances in what could be labeled "after -the -fact". 12. The granting of the required variances will result in the following violations of Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (A) of the zoning code of which the applicant must first comply before the requested variances can be granted: a) In review of the factual findings noted above, the City finds that the essential character of the neighborhood will be altered if the proposed variances were granted and the hardcover allowed to remain. Page 4 of 6 r � City of OR.ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. b) In review of the factual findings noted above, the City finds that the property in question can indeed be put to reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by official controls. The City has already approved substantial increases of hardcover to allow the applicant to improve the property and applicant can continue to reasonably enjoy that property. c) In review of the Lactual findings noted above, the plight of the applicant would appear to have been created by the applicant and not by circumstances unique to his property. Applicant has not provided additional information that would suggest the circumstances have been altered from the first review. d) In review of the factual findings noted above, the City would find that the granting of the proposed variances would appear to serve as a convenience to the applicant and that the applicant has not provided a demonstrable hardship or difficulty that the City can accept. e) In review of the f actual findings noted above, the City finds that to establish a precedent that would allow a property owne, to make improvements to a property conditioned on that property owner complying with special directives and then asking the City to reconsider their original decision after those improvements have been installed to be completely unreasonable and in complete conflict with the established environmental standards for lakeshore development within the City and to be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. The City also looks to the broader environmental principals and goals set forth in their Community Management Plan and the intent of the specific zoning district when, dealing with matters related to the public health, safety and welfare. Issues involving the public health, safety and welfare are not only resolved in securing the obvious traffic and drainage concerns surrounding but the City also feels obligated to provide itL citizens with a designates and approved optimum level of density, open space and quality of life. 13. Denial of the required variances does not constitute the taking of property or loss of substantial value because the property has always been used and enjoyed as esidential building site, all of which has served as required yard and open space for the existing residence. 14. The applicant has not introdi any evidence contrary to any of the above findings of fact. The applicant has claimed only that the property would be of greater value and use to him if he were allowed to maintain the current level of hardcover. Page 5 of 6 f '^ City of OR ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Applicant is hereby advised that all structural and non- structural hardcover scheduled for removal as a condition of Oronc Resolution No. 1936 must be completed by June 1, 1988. Applicant is further advised that the 151x15' apron approved in the original application can be relocated providing greater maneuverability on the property but in no case shall the hardcover within the 75 feet to 250 feet setback area exceed 29 percent. Adopted by the Ci'_y Council of the City of Orono this 25th day of April., 1988. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Paqe 6 of 6 2�' To: Mayor Grabek and City Council Members City Administrator Mark Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator Date: April 20, 1988 Subject: #1264 Thomas R. Smieja, 20 Cygnet Place - Variance - Resolution Application - Lot Area S(ariance Zoning District- RR-1B, 2 AcreMinimum Lot Size Lot Area- Existing Equals 1.37 Acres; Variance Equals 0.63 Acres or 31.5% List of Exhibits: A.) Memo and Exhibits of 4/8/88 B.) Planning Commission Action Notice of 4/20/88 C.) Proposed Resolution for Approval Discussion Please read the memo and exhibits of April 8, 1988. The applicant wishes to construct a single family residence on this 1.37 acre lot in a 2 acre zone. The lot is actually two smaller lots combined into one for tax purposes. this property is in single seperate ownership, and has never been owned in common with any of the adjacent neighboring developed properties. Planning Commission reviewed this application at their April 18, 1988 meeting, and recommended approval of the lot area variance, finding that: A. The lot size is consistent with existing developed lot sizes in the general area. B. The applicant has demonstrated that the lot contains suitable area for primary and alternate drainfield sites, while still allowing tt a development with a house, driveway and other normal amenities, without creating a potential health hazard in the neighborhood. C. No adjacent property is available for purchase to make this lot conforming in size. Planning Commission recommended approval subject to relocation of the existing shed to a conforming location, driveway access being to Cygnet Place, and located at least ;00' south of the Cygnet/Watertown. intersection, but driveway to be located to avoid tested drainfield sites; and payment of park fee. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the lot rrea variance for construction cf a single family residence at 20 Cygnet Place, per the attached resolution. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ... .:u, NO.------— S A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) FILE #1264 WHEREAS, Thomas R. Smieja (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 20 Cygnet Place within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legall,-, described as follows: Lots 1 & 2, Block 2 Swan Lake Addition, Hennepin Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the construction of a single family residence on a substandard vacant property of area 1.37 acres in the RR-lB zoning district where 2.00 acres minimum lot size is normally required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1264. 2. The property is located in the RR-lB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 18, 1988, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: A) The lot size is consistent with existing developed lot sizes in the general area. B) The applicant has demonstrated that the lot contains suitable area for primary and alternate drainfield sites, while still allowing the development of the house, driveway, and other normal amenities, without creating a potential health hazard in the neighborhood. C) No adjacent property is available for purchase to make this lot conforming in area. 4. The property has been in single seperate ownership since prior to the rezoning of tie property from 1 acre minimum lot size requirement Paqe I of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. to the current 2 acre requirement in 1975. The property is considered a lot of record in single separate ownership per Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 A (3) of the Orono Municipal Zon .ig Code. 5. The property cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the offical controls. 6. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. 7. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. 8. The City Council has considered this application, including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commissio , reports by City staff, comments by the applicant, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 9. The City Council finds that the conditions exi i.ng on this property are pecular to it and do not apply gener y to other property in this zoning district; that granting the vari_ .:e would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alle,.iate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more �-f the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (3) to permit t'he construction of a single family residence on the 1.37 acre vacant property at 20 Cygnet Place, subject to the following conditions: 1. The existing accessory shed shall be mol,ed tL, a conforming location behind both front lines of the r.roposeC house, prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the ho.ise. 2. Driveway access shall be to Cygnet Place and stall be located at least 100' south of the intersection of Watertown Road and Cygnet Place. The diiveway routing within the property shall be located so as not to interfere with the primary and alternate drainfield sites. Page 2 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. w .. 3. Park fee in the amount of $150.00 per the current fee schedule shall be paid with the building permit fee. 4. Authorities granted with this resolution run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (April 25, 1989). 5. violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned applicants and property owners have L,-ad, undersl-ood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, here")y agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of tht property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 25th .=.v of April, 1988. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Jarnes R. Grabek, Mayor Property Owner(s Property Owner(s ar{r• i c f 4 C) TO: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: Michael Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE: April 8, 1988 SUBJ: #1264 Thomas R. Smieja, 20 Cygnet Place - Variance - Public Hearing Application - Lot area variance Zoning District - RR-lB, 2 acre minimum lot size List of Exhibits - A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Survey E - Septic location/driveway access location F - 1974 Tax information/1988 Tax information G - Selected portions of house plan Pertinent Facts - Lot Area: Existing = 1.37 acres Required = 2.00 acres Lot Width: Required 200' Existing = 193' along Cygnet Place 308' along Watertown Road (no variance required) Wetlands on Property: None Septic System: Primary and alternate sites tested at southwest quadrant of propbrty. Staff will verify whether this site is acceptable for shallow trenches as indicated by site evaluation, or whether a mound type system will be needed due to the typically high water tables in this area. Ownership: Both lots were owned in common as a vacant parcel by William Mills as of 1974. Sometime after that, the lots were purchased as a combined lot by Robert Roessel who lived kitty- corner across Cygnet Place. This was used for a horse corral area by Mr. ROesEel. The 1988 tax books indicate the proper, are owned by Roger Woethe. The Smiejasplan to purchase property to construct a new home. Pertinent Code Sections - 10.03 Subdivision 6(A)(3) (Lot of Record in Single Sepa: Ownership) 10.28 Subdivision 5R (RR-1B l.ot Area Standards) Zoning File #1264 Page 2 Discussion - The SmicjaF- rf-auest a lot area variance in order to construct a residence on this 1.37 acre lot in single Separate ownership. At the time the Swan Lake Addition was )latted in 1959, City ordinances required lot sizes at least 25,CuJ s.f. in area and at least 120' in width at the building line. This property was subsequently rezoned to 1 acre lot size and 14C' width which was in effect until 1975 when the area was rezoned to 2 acre minimum lot size, 200' width. The lots individually appeared to meet the coee standards in effect at the time of subdivision, and are considered in �embinatiun as a single record lot. The two lots have been owned in common since 1974 or prior, but have not been commonly owned with any adjacent properties. Since the property has the capability to support a primary and alternate septic system, it staff's opinion that this is a viable building site. Staff feels there will be no adverse impact on the character of the neighborhood, since this parcel is equal to or larger that; most neighboring developed lots on Cygnet Place. ')ne issue for discussion is the existence of a 12'x '.6' shed shown on the survey. Once the house is placed as shown on the survey, that shed will be in a non -conforming location. A condition of variance approval should be that that shed be relocated to a conforming location behind the two front lines of the house. A second condition of approval -.mould be that the driveway access is required to be on Cygnet Place, and located at least 100' south of the center line of Watertown Road, but the driveway and access must also be located north of the primary and alternate drainfield sites. Staff would note that given the proposed loca*ion of the house, any accessory structure such as a swimming pool, gazebo, detached garage etc. would be restricted to the small area to the east and south of the house. Merely as a point of interest, staff would for the record differentiate this situation from that of application #990, Ward Ferrell located a quarter -mile to the west on Watertown Road. The Smie ja property has since bef^re adoption of the 2 acre zoning, been in single separate ownership as a combined lot not owned by any adjacent property owners. In Ferrell's case, where he has three separate but adjacent 1 acre lots in common ownership, Orono codes do not grant him the right to build on each of the substandard 1 acre lots, whereas those same codes have long allowed the grantinq of a variance for substandar(' lots that are not owned in common with adjacent de✓el.oped property. The rationale behind this is that a person with a residence and an adjacent vacant, lot has the use of that. vacant lot as being accessory to the existing residence. In the case of a lnt in single separate ownership, if a house was not al lowed to be bu.,t, the property owner could argue that he is allowed no rf,asonal le use of his property and therefore the City miqht be found •�Y trite curt to owe damages for a "taking" of property. Zoning File 01264 Page 3 To sum it up, the owner of a substandard vacant lot adjacent to his substandard developed lot is not allowed to sell off the vacant lot and make his total ownership even more substandard. The owner of a vacant lotnot adjacent to any other property he owns,certainly has a hardship in that the lot exists at a certain size and must be granted a certain level of reasonable use if the lot can physically support such use. Granting of this variance would be consistent with other lot area variances granted in contempory times in the RR-1B zoning district, as follows: Year Appl. ddress Lot Area Status Approvvd? Number 197I 231 190 Cygnet 0.70 AC Single Separate Yes Ownership, Vac Lot 1985 635 1290 Lyman 1.13 AC 1985 956 1200 Bracketts Pt 1.17 AC 1987 1105 1180 Lyman 1.50 AC 1987 1110 1840 Shoreline 1.80 AC 1987 1185 964 Edgewood Hills 1.5 AC 1981 635 1900 Shoreline 1.7 AC 1985 3405 Watertown 1.04 AC .85 AC Single Separate Yes Ownership, Pre- existing House Single Separate Yes Ownership, Pre- existinq House Single Separate Yes ownership, Vac Lot Single Separate Yes Ownership, Vac Lot Single Separate Yes ownership, Vac Lot Commonly Owned with No Adjacent: 1.8 AC f Developed Lot Commonly Owned with No Adjacent 1.01 AC ± Developed Lot Staff Recomowndation Staff recommends approval of a lot area variance for Thomas Smieja to allow construction of a residence on a 1.37 acre lot in single separate ownership where a lot qi ze of 2 acres is required, finding that: Zoning File #1264 Page 4 A.) The lot size is consistent with existing developed lot sizes in the general area. B.) The applicant has demonstrated that the lot contains suitable area for primary and alternate drainfield sites, while still allowing the development with a house, driveway and other normal amenities, without creating a potential health hazard in the neighborhood. C.) No adjacent property is available for purchase to make this a conforming lot size. Conditions of approval should be: A.) Relocation of the existing shed to a conforming location behind both the front lines of the proposed house. B.) Driveway access shall be to Cygnet Place and located at least 100' south of the intersection of Watertown Road and Cygnet Place, but driveway to be located so as not to interfere with the primary and alternate drainfield sites. C.) Payment of park fee in the amount of $150.00 per the current fee schedule, to be paid with the building permit fee. CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION n Site Address Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) cv iAlLt OcclEr 64 - // 7- ?3 - 2 Z - d 7 2Q V 5EN 150. 00 uLCA TR 150. x Please check one - Property abstract or _ torrens? RECEIPT-//}}THA,VA• YOU h�: i � 7�0 r+1/"I l TI 1:45 Attach legal description to application if not included on DO required survey. n�/7r/OJ 1 L., --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Phone (home) Name C fy) 4C � ( 15 �� 1'�iG� Phone ( ork ) Address ly _ City: LGVIpI La��- Zip: ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- OWNER ( i f different than applicant) Phone (home) !J73 30.38 Name eO6e7e Phone (work) 94/-Sdti7 Address: /3-3 ���/F" (,�A(/F City: WAf74 Zip: S.S35/ Date Property Acquired Ao'ele- / 5180 (month/year) I (do) ( o no also own the adjacent parcels of land. -------------- �- ------------------------------------------------------------ PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property �r�� l Residential Other (specify) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: 13,e :4(-t�()e `-oy-N. � of ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances ( Fr-,nt Side Rear) 1,ther HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: -----•----------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: ' ` iL ) f r CA --------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (A10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 8. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). T'. As an addendum to this apvlicr.tion, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 1". Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owni sign this application. Please remember that your variance apF Dn is not complete if the above information has not been included. ----------------------------------- -•---------------------------------- Certification by Zoning Department Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the 'Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature `rvv) � 9 Date _'f Y-'Ck -13 ICf'-f OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowled s and agrees to this application and Further authorizes reasonable en y nto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission membe s, nd Council members for purposes of investiga- tion and verification: o is request. G ��AA �Q' Owner's Signature �/ Date ��0U Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meetinq. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. .. _ 865 _ _ 33- //91,. 1 f: tO re)/ i,4; N 3" �t► * 7K�d °. 1 , e 1� Ile *AND q 4 F Ir 1225 L=J RIWANOF •.. +y 1 � ' r PUN DATE 03/17/88 r r BATCH 006 A E E 38 04-117-23 22 0001 f PROP ADOP 03085 WATERTOWN PD OWNER NAME LAURA FERRELL TAXPAYER SHERMAN I LINDSTROM NAME/ADDR 3085 WATERTOWN ROAD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-C3 22 0016 PPOP ADOP 00060 CYGNET PL OW:EP NAME RICHARD J DUNLAP TAXPAYER ALAN SLONIM ♦' NAME/A30R 60 CYGNET PLACE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 32 0001 PROP ADOP 03140 WATERTOWN RD CANEP NAME H J PANUSKA ETAL Tt'•.PAYEF LR HAROLD J PANUSKA NAME.'AODR 670 SOUTHDALE MED BLDG EDINA MN 55435 r 0r N r HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY Ot*!ERS LIST 38 04-117-23 22 0007 00025 CYGNET PL NANCY L THAYER NANCY THAYER 25 CYGNET PLACE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 22 0017 00080 CYGNET PL P A A VITKO PAUL A A AMI L VITKO 60 CYGNET PLACE LONG LAKE MN 55356 TOTAL BATCH 006 00007 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 16 38 04-117-23 22 0008 00065 CYGNET PL DIANE L KOEPKE DIANE L KO' 'KE 65 CYGNET -ACE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-7? ?7 0024 00020 CY:,NET PL R A B W(`iHE ROGER ►OT'.YE 133 GROVE LA WAYZATA MN 55391 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUF PEPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECOP c OF THE HENNEPIN COU11TY DEPART ENT F OPERTY TAXATION. TO THE BE/S', OF MY KNOWLEDGE e1:D BDEAIYIJWBY ��/iG��'�Z� Certificate of Survey for Thomas 11,. Sin ie•la �1 Lot,, 1 dnd 2, Block 2. SWAN LAKE AHUI rioi,i llennrTIn County. MinnCSOt.a c f, (vc-Yer/nw I n sy. v i _ j0 jp � f col', i v QLu> fr�q 37! wc.rr 1 '\ ti � 1 w w �.• C . O — 1 • •• Irr.y� 30 1 hereby certit'v that this is a true and correct repre- sentation of j survey of the boundaries of Lots t and ?, i;Io'-k SWAN LAME AUUI I IQN, `.he I lnn Uf di I e;ttstt.'to ::UI ldl ally , there;)n . and the propo-jeo 1 uc dt l on of a proposed hu 1 it dues nut purport '_o Show mny other lmprovemttnt, or, enr-r0,,..11 ments. SC t I e 1 ' _ 60 !; GkUt 13Ef1G . 1 NC . Date 3-25-88 _ 0 Iron marker Mark 6ronbery lc. No. 15 Eny l neer•, , Lind Srjr•v4=ycr, and F I jwivr� L1)ity Lake, M! itri sots tcwtt:-!i '40/ p��f : i •t 7-l0 ♦ . �c�cKwsir �w« PAC Sat TE ar --F iTc-3 GALVI4 f ChL-CM E L LUA.• L U c- EM 14PT • �` 1 O T VEAASEk ETAL 278-3 O T WEASSEN -� AT 1 c w:JAB 1 . • T T-X l� •.1��.oE MIC-aIEL P CtLE _T. L tlE-a - --- TC 11G-6J639 llv • MICkAEL P E eL E 10 1 } . S 6E.4 TAX #<-mESi SAL _ T-- - LE.b. EACISE 74A LA -. NOS X`•L [4TEi►E ST • 1.O.i�.40 1 •t 15• use i•S34.a1 32 5.00 45.07 1�25c+.o8�• _ 13. e98 389745 _ -- - - --- — -- — 1,3�T.14 3Z 5.00 -- _ 4Oo 26 1.Oa2o4Os* . --- bILLIAr T PILLS ETAL 2Tb-3 2v4GQ_- 1,ILLIA1+ T ILL$ - — --- - - - -- - 200 LEAF ST l 2 LOAG L AKE MN xi�150 1.204 4 GEl• TAX — -- - - — 123o7ON .,a bILLIAM T AILLS ETAL i 27♦3 2�8M b lLL IAP T PILLS 2 2 M'L bi>>L S LOA.. c • ® - - -' j.��i.: .: a .'.�'• yw� ,�L_._ �.. ELM DATE O1/2 TOTAL PAID HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM 1988 TAX BOOK 38 ORONO .00 OWNER MORT CODE/LOAN t TAXPAYER NAME/ADDRESS ESCROW NAME/ADDRESS METES A1O BOUNDS PATRICIA A WARDEN 316 0722 50355 MARGARET D ROSSING 130 CYGNET PL LONG LAKE MN 55356 LOTS 1 AND 2 TAXABLE MARKET 100,700 QUALIFYING AMT TAXABLE ASSESSO 20,389 FD SHARED ASSD RENTAL TAX FD AREA RATE IF PROD AMT IF PROJECT NO. REPORT NC. PI433401 ADDITION NAME LOT BLK PLAT PARCEL PROP=PTY I.D. ACREAGE SCH WTR SEW PROPERTY ADDRESS SN TWP RG QQ SUFX DST SHO DST SWAN LAKE ADDITION 003 434SO 04-117-23 22 0023 000.00 278 3 130 CYGNET PL STATUS: CURRENT CONSTRUCTION YEAR 1969 2.263.87 DIVISION NO 84119 EARLIEST DELQ YR - 87 DIVISION DATE 11/64 .000 SEE ID S O4-117-23 22 0018 04-117-23 22 0019 TAX LEVY/DESCRIPTION HMSTOPRTYP RATE AMOUNT LAND BLDG MACH OWN7 BASE1 BASE2 NHBASE NON-11MST GEN TAX H R 111.034 2.263.87 32,000 68,700 1 00 11,560 8.829 HMSTD CR 693.11 HMSTO CR ASSD 11,560 TOTAL TAX 1,570.76 TOTAL PAID .00 OWNER MORT COOE/LOAN i TAXPAYER NAME/ADDRESS ESCROW NAME/ADDRESS METES AND BOUNDS R A B WOTHE ROGER WOTHE 133 GROVE }�A�MN 55391 LOTS 1 AND 2 21.000 QUALIFYING AMT TAXABLE ASSESSO 5.880 FO SHARED ASSD RENTAL TAX FD AREA RATE IF PROJ AMT IF PROJECT NO. TAX LEVY/DESCRIPTION HMSTDPRTYP RATE AMOUNT NON -HOMESTEAD GEN TAX N R 111.034 652.86 TOTAL TAX 652.86 TOTAL PAID .00 —OWNER MORT COOE/LOAN 9 TAXPAYER NAME/ADDRESS ESCROW NAME/ADDRESS METES AND BOUNDS AMT UNPAID 1.570.76 ADDITION NAME LOT BLK PLAT PARCEL PROPERTY I.D. ACREAGE SCH WTR SEW PROPERTY ADDRESS SN TWP RG QQ SUFX DST SHD DST SWAN LAKE ADDITION 002 43450 04-117-23 22 0024 000.00 278 3 20 CYGNET PL STATUS: CURRENT CONSTRUCTION YEAR .00 DIVISION NO 85072 DIVISION DATE 07/85 000 SEE ID S O4-117-23 22 0014 04-117-23 22 0015 LAND BLDG MACH OWN/ BASEI BASE2 NHBASE NON-HMST 20,000 1.000 Slag* AMT UNPAID 652.86 ADDITION NAME LOT BLK PLAT PARCEL PROPERTY I.D. ACREAGE SCH WTR SEW PROPERTY ADDRESS SN TWP RG QQ SUFX DST SHD DST Ci Oa LJLILILI [j lull OT RMC M-VM-DMNT CORPORATIM. &SSW= MINNETONKA DESIGN ELM rm =r1rcowralcm U"Tww MIN "U" = ZW 'Fum PWT=M](AL 110MI DISIGNM MAMUSM OFFCZ COMPUM CF sm AW MIC 80 VZST 7M STRUT cmwlwomz gimt w com- SUTTE 210 CHANHASM. )M W, v SL C V3 %NKTM (612) 934-7440 ZONING FILE NO. 1264 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNINC COMMISSION ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 4/19/88 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Tom & Chris Smieja COPIES TO: Roger Wothe Box 71 133 Grove Lane Long Lake, MN 55356 Wayzata, MN 55391 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: 4/18/88 VOTE: 5 For 0 Against Planning Com ission recos ends the following: App•-oval subject to conditions noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Relocate existing shed to a conforming location on the property (must be done prior to Certificate of Occupancy issuance.) 2. Driveway access shall be to Cygnet Place, located at least 100' south of intersection with Watertown Road. Driveway shall be located with the property so that it does not encroach upon drainfield sites. 3. Payment of Park fee of $150.00 with the building permit. Applicant's next schedu'ed meeting is confirmed as: City Council April 25, 1988; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. Your item will likely be reviewed at approximately 8:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. To: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator i-tkib"di From: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director Date: April 21.1988 Subject: Plans and Specifications, Woodhill Road Set assessment hearing date Attached for review and approval are the specifications for the upgrading of Woodhill Road east of Orono Orchard Road. I have included only that part of the specifications for special provisions and specific requirements. The remainder of the specification is at the City Office for review if requested. As noted in the specification, the bid opening will be April 29, 1988 10:00 a.m. CDT. It is recommended that the assessment hearing be conducted at the same meeting as the bid award. In order to tabulate bids and allow proper time for legal notice of the public hearing, the assessment hearing and bid award will have to be at the May 23, 1988 Council meeting. Recommendation to approve the Plans and Specifications for Woodhill Road and authorize the City Engineer to advertise for bids with a bid opening on April 29, 1988 at 10:00 a.m. CDT. It is further recommended that the assessment public hearing date he set for May 23, 1988 7:00 p.m. Proposed motion moved 2nd to approve the Plans and Specification__s for Woodhill Road and authorize the City Engineer to advertise fo- for bids with a bid openf ng on April 29, 1988 and to designate May 23, 1988 7:00 as the assessment hearing and bid award date. TO: Mayor and City Council `i FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato)k Forwarded recommending approval.. NOODHILL AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 88-1 FILE NO. 13934 ORONO, MINNESOTA 1988 INDEX Index Advertisement for Bids Information to Bidders Proposal Specia: Provisions 21_0. Roadway Excavation - Specific Requirements 2211. Aggregate Base - Specific Requirements 2331. Plant -Mixed Bituminous Pavement - Specific Requirements 2341. Plant -Mixed Bituminous Pavement - Specific Requirements 2357. Bituminous Tack Coat. - Specific Requirements 2575. Turf Establishment - Specific Pequirements Conditions of the Contract I hereby certify that this plan and specificat. =-s prepared by me or under my direct supervision and I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the tate of Minnesota. Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Date: March 24, 1988 Reg. No. 9451 I'P13934 t „-, 1?ERTISFMr!1T FOP P?nS Sealed bids will be received by the City of Orono, ninnesota at 1335 Brom Road South, until 1L:00 A.M., C.S.T. on _ at which time they will be publicly opened and read aloud for the of all labor and materials and all else necessary for the following: in the City Hall furnishing VOrJDHILL AVENUE. - STREET i!4PROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 88-1 1,000 Cu.yds. Common Excavat`on 2,200 Ton Aggregate Base 440 Ton Bituminous Surfacing Plans and specifications, proposal forms and contract documents may be seen at the office of the City Clerk, Orono, Minnesota, and at the office of Bone- stroo, Rosene, Anderlik L Associates, Inc., Consulting Engineers, 2335 N. Trunk Highway 36, St. Paul, Mn. 55113. Each bid shall be accompanied by a bidder's bond naming the City of Orono as obligee, certified check payable to the Clerk of the City of Orono or a cash deposit equal to at least five percent (52) of the amount of the bid, vt ich shall be forfeited to the City in the event that the bidder fails to enter into a contract. The City Council reserves the right to retain the deposits of tie three lowest bidders for a period not to exceed 30 days after the date and time set for the opening of bids. No bids may be withdrawn for a period of +.hirty (30) day: after the date and time set for the opening of bids. Payment for the work will be by cash or check. Contractors desiring a copy of the plans and specifika,.ions and proposal forms may obtain tnem from the office of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik 6 Associates, Inc., upon payment of a deposit of $30.00, all of which will he refunded to all I ona fide bidders, providing said plans and specifications are retirned in good condition within fifteen (15) days after the date set for the opening of bids. A bona fide bidder is one who Ec..ually s36ns and submits a bid. No money will be refunded to any person who obtains plans and ;;pecificatiins and does not submit a bid to the Owner. The City Council reserves the right 'o reject any and all bids, to waive ir- regularities and informalities thtrein and further reserves the right to award the contract to the best interests of the City. MLrk Bernhardson city of Orono. Minnesota OR13934 INFORMATION TO BIDDERS 1. BID PROCEDURE: Each Contractor has been furnished a specification, plan and two extra proposals. In submitting his bid, the Contractor shall bid on the separate Proposal designated "BID COPY" and not in the specification book. A sealed envelope shall contain the Proposal. 2. PLAN DEPOSIT: A. Prime Contractor; A Prime Contractor may obtain one set of plans and specifications for the deposit as stipulated in the Advertisement for Bids. All of the deposit shall be returned if the Prime Contra,. , ibmits a bona - fide bid and returns the plans and specifications in g-o tion within 15 days after the date set for opening of bids. A Prime Contractor is defined as a general contractor who submits a -ona- fide bid or an electrical or mechanical subcontractor who provides a complete sub -bid to more than one general contractor. The general contractors receiv- ing a quotation must be named by the subcontractor with the return of the plans and specifications to be eligible for deposit return. A bid for equip- ment or material only is not considered a complete sub -bid. Prime contractors may obtain more than one set of plans and specifications if necessary, however, no refund will be given for these additional sets. B. Material Supply Any material supplier may obtain one set of plans and specifications for posit as stipulated in the Advertisement for Bids. One-half of this amounL . 11 be returned if the plans and specifications are returned in good condition within 15 days after the date set -'jr the opening of bids. Successful low material suppliers who notify our receptionist within five (5) days after the bid opening may retain their plans and specifications and one-half of their deposit will be returned. Individual drawings and sections of the specifications may be purchased at the rate of Five Dollars ($5.00) per sheet of drawings and Twenty Five Cents ($0.25) per sheet of specifications for which no refund shall be made. C. Plan Deposit Refund: No deposit refund shall specifications returned less than forty-eight (48) hour hour if the Contractor does not submit a bid. 89A 7/85 be made for plans and s prior to bid letting SPECIAL PROVISIONS 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project provides for the grading, gravel base, and bituminous surfacing on Woodhill Avenue. 2. OWNER: The City of Orono is designated as the Owner of the project. All work shall be on public right-of-way or easements obtained by the Owner. 3. COMPLETION DATE: The contractor shall start work within 15 days afar award of the contract and complete the project by July 15, 1988. 4. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: Liquidated damages as specified in the General Condi- tions of the Contract shall be One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) per calendar day. 5. SPECIFICATION REVISION: Where the Minnesota Department of transportation specifications are referred to herein and where a reference to the word •State• is mentioned, it is understood that the word •Owner' is substituted. All reference to the word 'Engineer" shall be interpreted as the Engineer for the City of Orono. Minnesota Department of Transportation Specifications for Highway Construction, 1983 Edition and revisions thereto shall apply except as noted herein. 6. TRAFFIC: Traffic control :;tu:ll be the responsibility of the Contractor. All flagmen, barricades, flares and safety measures are the sole responsibil- ity of the Contractor. Flares or approved flashers shall be required from sunset to sunrise in the areas under construction. The contractor shall re- view barricades and signing placement with the Engineer. Traffic control shall be incidental to the construction. 7. SCALE: The Contractor shalt provide the necessary scale and scale person for weighing the items furnished on a ton basis under these specifications. The scale setup is subject to the approval of the engineer. The necessary weights used in testing the scale shall be provided by the Contractor. 8. SOIL CONDITIONS: All Co:itrzctors are advised to inspect the entire project area and verify soil conditions to their own satisfaction prior to submitting a bid. 9. WATER: Where water is required in the work specified herein, it shall be provided by the contractor. No payment will be made for water placed on the project. It shall be con- sidered incidental to the aggregate base construction. 10. UTILITIES: Known underground utilities are shown on the plans. It shall be the responsibility of tine Cont--actor to check with all utility coo-:)anies to determine the exact location:, of al.i utilities within the project area. SP-1 OR13934 11. TESTS: All material tuG11s required in the specifications shall be paid for by the City of Orono. This does not eliminate the Contractor's responsi- bility of assisting the Engineer by notification of pit and scale location and other correlated itrmu in advanca of the starting time so that adequate con- trol measures can be established. Test failures shall be retested at the Contractor's expense. 12. DRIVEWAYS: Driveway replacement is required on Yoodhill Avenue as a part of this project. Driveways shall be replaced to the existing surfacing as directed by the Engineer. Bituminous driveway replacement shall consist of a minimum of 3 inches of asphalt pavement and 6 inches of Class 5 gravel base. PavID'^r. for bituminous driveways sha'_1 be on a ton basis. The Class 5 gravel br -hall be paid for on a ton basis. The con- tractor shall be required to say, or jack hammer a square edge across the existing bituminous driveway. Payment for 2341 bituminous material for drive- ways shall include bituminous material for mixture, joint sawing, compaction and all other items incidental to the complete driveway surfacing. 14. PROPERTY ACCESS: The Contractor shall provide access to each property owner as much as practical during construction. The contractor shall work out an acceptable schedule for access with the City Public Yorks Director. 15. GEOTEXTILE STABTLTZATION FA.rRIC: A stabilization type geotextile fabric r shall be spread over the subgrade on Woodhill Avenue prior to placing the gravel base. SP-2 0413934 ` 2105. ROADYAY EXCAVATION Specific Requirements 2105.0. SPECIFICATION REFERENCE: Section 2105 of the State of Minnesota De- partment of Transportation. 'Standard Specifications for Highway Construc- tion', 1983 Edition, and all amendments thereto. shall apply except as modi- fied or altered in the following Specific Requirements. 2105.3. CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS: All excavation and embankment construction shall be to the line and grade as staked by the Engineer. The excavated material shall be used to grade the boulevards as directed by the Engineer. The boulevard areas shall be filled to a point three inches below the final grade as shown on the typical section. The boulevard area shall be left level and free from rocks, clods and other debris. The contractor shall provide topsoil borrow for the project. The topsoil shall not be placed on the boulevard or ditch area until the fine grading is approved by the Engineer. The contractor will be required to grade the ditch slopes as incidental to the topsoil borrow. Excess material from the roadway excavation shall be disposed of along Woodhill Drive as directed by the Engineer. The excavated material will be used to grade and flatten ditch slopes between Station 3+00 and Station 6+00. The contractor will be required to grade the disposal areas as directed by the Engineer as incidental to the excavation. 2105.5. BASIS OF PAYMENT: Common excavation shall be paid for on a cubic yard basis as determined by cross section measure. Topsoil borrow shall be paid for on a cubic yard basis (compacted volume) compacted in place. OR13934 Copyright 1988 Bonestroo, Rosene, Andorlik 6 Associates, Inc. 2211. AGGREGATE BASE Specific Requirements 2211.0. SPECIFICATION REFERENCE: Section 2211 of the State of Minnesota, De- partment of Transportation, 'Standard Specifications for Highway Construc- tion', 1983 Edition, and all amendments thereto, shall apply except as modi- fied or altered in the following Specific Requirements. 2211.2.1. AGGREGATE: Aggregate material used for this project shall be in ac- cordance with Mn/DOT Section 2211 for Class 5 gravel base (1001 crushed) or for Class 3 aggregate base. 2211.3. CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS: The subgrade shall be inspected, checked, and approved by the Engineer prior to placement of aggregate base. The aggregate base shall be compacted by the method called "specified density' to 10OZ standard density in accordance with specified density requirements. Driveways shall be regraded where necessary as directed by the Engineer. Six inches of Class 5 shall be placed on all driveways. 2211.4. METHOD OF MEASUREMENT: Aggregate base Class 5 used on this project shall be measured by weight in tons of material deposited on rhe roadway as required by the typical section shown on the plans. 2211.5. BASIS OF PAYMENT: Payment for aggregate base Class 5 shall be by the ton compacted inplace. Nhere, in the opinion of the Engineer, aggregate base is being wasted, deductions in the quantity of base for payment purposes will be made on the basis of 110 pounds per square yard inch of thickness. OR13934 Copyright 1988 Boneotroo, Rosene, A^deriir & At;sou iat c's , Lli( - 2331. PLANT MIXED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT Specific Requirements 2331.0. SPECIFICATION REFERENCE: Section 2331 of the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, "Standard Specifications for Highway Construc- tion', 1983 Edition, and all amendments thereto, shall apply except as modi- fied or altered in the following Specific Requirements. 2331. DESCRIPTION: This work shall consist of the construction of a plant mixed base course over an aggregate base. The bituminous base course shall be 1� inches in compacted thickness as shown on the typical section. 2331.3. CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS: The base course shall be compacted to 951 of standard marshall density. The contractor shall be required to saw cut any driveways or streets where the new surfacing will match existing bituminous surfacing. The contractor shall remove material as directed by the Engineer to provide a smooth transition between the existing surface and the new surface. The saving, removal and disposal shall be incidental to the placement of the base course. 2331.3.4. PROPORTIONING: The percentage of weight of bitumen is estimated at 5h percent for the base course. OR13934 Copyright 1988 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik 6 Associatea, Inc. 2341. PLANT MIXED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT Specific Requirements 2341.0. SPECIFICATION REFERENCE: Section 2341 of the State of Minnesota, De- palLment of Transportation, "Standard Specifications for Highway Construc- tion", 1983 Edition, and all amendments thereto, shall apply except as modi- fied or altered in the following Specific Requirements. 2341.1. DESCRIPTION: This work shall consist of the construction of a plant mixed wear course over a bituminous base course. The wear course shall be 1-1/2 inches compacted thickness as shown on the typical section. The contractor shall saw cut all existing bituminous driveways to provide a smooth transition from the new surface to the old surface. 2341.2.1. Aggregate: Aggregate material used for this project shall be in accordance with Mn/DOT Section 3'39 (BA-1). Driveway mixture shall be modified to required 100I passing the 5/8' sieve. 2341.3.2. Proportioning: The percentage of weight of bitumen is estimated at 6.51 for the wear course.. 2341.3.3. Treatment of Surface: The bituminous base course shall receive a tack coat of 0.05 gals/sq.yd. prior to placement of the wear course unless otherwise directs `,v the Engineer. 2341.6. BITUMINOUS SPILLWAY: To be placed as directed by the Engineer. Payment shall be made on the ton basis under 2341 bituminous wear. OR13934 Copyright 1988 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik 6 Associates, Inc. 2357. BITUMINOUS TACK COAT Specific Requirements 2357.0. SPECIFICATION REFERENCE: Section 2357 of the State of Minnesota. Department of Transportation, "Standard Specifications for Highway Construc- tion,' 1983 Edition and all amendments thereto, shall apply except as modified or altered herein. 2575.1. DESCRIPTION: This work shall consist of treating the bituminous binder surface prior to placing the wearing courses. 2357.2.1. Bituminous Materials: Bituminous materials for tack coat shall meet the requirements for Mn/DOT Specification 3151 for RC 70 or RC 250. 2357.3. CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS: The tack coat shall be applied to the existing surface at the locations as shown on the plans. The rate of application of the tack coat shall be as directed by the Engineer, but not greRter than 0.05 gallons per square yard. The surface to be coated shall be dry and free from all foreign material prior to the application of the tack coat. 2357.4. METHOD OF MEASUREMENT: Bituminous material for tack coat will be measured by volume in gallons at 60 F. 2357.5. BASIS OF PAYMENT: Payment for bituminous materials used for tack cent shall be compensation in full for all costs incidental to the furnishing and application. ITEM NO. ITEM UNIT 2357.502 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat Gal. ' OR13934 Copyright 1988 Bonestroo, Rusene, Anderlik i Associates, Inc. 2575. TURF ESTABLISHMENT Specific and General Requirements 2575.0. SPECIFICATION REFERENCE: Unless otherwise noted or modified herein. all sections of Mn/DOT Specification 2575 shall apply. 2575.1. DESCRIPTION: All disturbed areas within the project shall be seeded. 2575.2. MATERIALS: A. Seed: Mixture 5 shall be used. E. Fertilizer: A commercial grade specified as 12-•12-12 shall be used. F. Mulch Material: Type 1 mulch shall be used. 2575.3. CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS: A. General: The contractor is cautioned to salvage all available and suit- able topsoil from the prnject site for respreading on areas to be restored. The contractor shall place n minimum of 3 inches of topsoil over all areas to be seeded or sodded. C. Applying Fertilizer: Fertilizer shall be applied at the rate of 400 poundp per acre over all seeded areas of turf establishment. D. Sowing Seed: Seed shall be applied at the rate of 50 pounds per acre over all disturbed areas designated for seeding. Seeding shall be done as soon as possible after finish grading has been completed. E. Applying Mulch: Much shall be disc anchored into the soil. The anchor- ing equipment shall be operated in a general direction at right angles to the direction of surface drainage wherever practical. Mulch shall be applied on all seeded areas of turf establishment. H. Maintenance: The contractor shall be solely responsible for replacement and/or repair of any seeded area that may wash -out, erode, or fail to grow prior to acceptance with no dditioral compensation therefor. 2575.5. BASIS OF PAYMENT: The sod as bid in the proposal shall include 3 inches of topsoil. The seeding as bid in the proposal shall include seed, mulch, fertilizer and grading. The topsoil on the seeded areas shall be paid for by the cubic yard (CV) compacted in place. OR13934 Copyright 1988 } Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik t i Associates, Inc. CONTRACTOR TOTAL BASE BID PROPOSAL FOR HOODHILL AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 88-1 FILE NO. 13934 ORONO, MINNESOTA 1988 0 OPENING T74E: 10:00 A.M., CN,-T. OPENING DATE: Friday, April 29. 1988 Honorable City Council City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Gentlemen: The unders'gned, being familiar pith your local conditions, having made the field inspections and investigations deemed necessary, having studied the plans and specifications for the work including Addenda Nos. and being familiar with all factors and other conditions affecting the work and cost thereof, hereby proposes to furnish all labor, tools, materials, skills, equipment and all else necessary to completely construct the project in accordance with the plans and specifications on file with your Clerk and Bonestroo. Rosene, Anderlik 6 Associates, Inc., 2335 N. Trunk Highway 36, St. Paul, Minnesota 55113, as follows: 50 Each Clear and grub trees @ DOLLARS CENTS $ /each $ 300 Cu.yds. Common excavation @ DOLLARS CENTS $ /cu yd $ 1.350 Sq.yds. Stabilization fabric @ DOLLARS $ /sq.yd. $ 500 Cu.yds. Granular borrow (C.V.) @ DOLLARS CENTS __$___ /cu.yd $ P-1 OR13934 1,600 Ton Class 5, i00i crushed aggregate base @ DOLLARS CENTS $ /ton $ 250 Ton 2331 bituminous base course @ DOLLARS CENTS $ /ton $ 250 Ton 2341 bituminous wear course @ DOLLARS CENTS $ /ton $ 30 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ DOLLARS CENTS $ /ton $ 200 Vdls. Bituminous material for tack coat @ DOLLARS CENTS $ /gal $ 20 Ton Bituminous material for driveways @ _ DOLLARS CENTS $ /ton $ 500 Sq.yde. Sod with topsoil @ DOLLARS CENTS $ /sq yd $ .5 Ac. Seeding with mulch in place @ DOLLARS CENTS $ /acre $ 250 Cu.yds. Topsoil borrow (C.V.) @ DOLLARS CENTS $ /cu.yd. $ TOTAL BASE BID ..............................$ The final amount of the contract shall be determined by multiplying the final measured quantities of the various items actually constructed and installed by the unit prices stated therefor. in the manner prescribed in the specifica- tions. However, the low bidder shall be determined by adding the sums result- ing from multiplying the quantities stated ' , the unit prices bid therefor. Accompanying this bid is a bidder's bond, ::ertiiied check or cash deposit in the amount of DOLLARS CENTS ($ ) which is at least five percent (52) of the amount of my/our bid made payable to the City of Orono. Minnesota, and the same is subject to forfeiture in the event of default on the part of the undersigned or failure on the part of the undersigned to execute the prescribed contract and bond within fifteen (15) days after its submittal to me/us. ORI1�)30 In submitting this bid it is understood that the Owner retains the right to reject any and all bids and to waive irregularities and iu&—malities therein and to award the contract to the best interests of the Owner. In submitting this bid it is understood that payment will be by cash or ctieck. It is understood that bids may not be withdrawn for a period of 30 days after the date and time set for the opening of bids. It is understood that. the Owner reserves the right to retain the certified check or bond of the thr.k_ lowest bidders as determined by the Owner for a period not to exceed 30 days after the date set for the opening of bids. Respectfully submitted, (A Corporation) (An Individual) Name of Bidder (A Partnership) By Title Printed Name of Signer Address City, State & Zip Code Telephone No. Y- i OR13914 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ORDERIt'G ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS AND SET ASS&;SMhNT HEARING DATE FOR WOODHILL ROAD WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the upgrading of Woodhill Road; and WHEREAS, the C.:y staf` and Council has reviewed the plans an6 specifications for Woo ' Road; and WHEREAS, the plans an. ,pecifications meet with the staff and Council approval. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the plans and specifications are hereby approved and direct the City Fngineer to advertise for bids for the upgrading of Woodhill Rcad. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Orono Council does hereby designate May 23, 1988 at 7:00 P.M. as the assessment hearing and bid award date. Adopted by the Orono Council of the City of Orono at a regularly --cheduled Council meeting April 25, 1988. --m-s --- R-. -G-------, -M-a---r--------------- ATTEST: Dorothy M. Bailin, City Clerk 41588.2 TO: Mayor and City Council c t 6 FRr"' Mark Bernhardson, City AHministratory%, DATE: April 15, 1988 SUBJBCT: Planning Commission Interviews Attachments: A. Letters of Intent a). Sara Moos b). Robert L. Minkema c). Stephen M. Johnston d). Dale A. Christensen e). Lester Kelley f). Curtis Quady B. Proposed Questionaire C. Current Planning Commission Members D. Ordinance 2.51 (as amended by Ordinance 31, Second Series ISSUE Issue 1. Conducting interviews of interested candidates for the vacancy on the Planning Commission. Issue 2. Selecting an individual to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of naul--plor. Issue 3. Review of designati .,s to see if persons currently on the _�lanning Commission need to have designations changed in order to meet the guidelines setforth in Attachment D. IN4110DUC_TION - With the resignation of Paul Taylor, who has beer a r 6:a1 repres-nta`{v•:: can the Planning Commission, the City staff was directed in the paper together with sending letters to ;.hose whu last vcar had indicated an interest in the Planning Commission '`,,x;ethc with Park Commission members. Additionally as nott-d in A'. tachement D the Council had adopted an ordinance for the apl,: r tment of Planning Commission that related not only to "Rural" (2), "At Large" (2) and "Urban" (2) designations but also to "Lake" res,.ience (1). Currently the only "Urban" representative is Jeff Johnson. DISCUSSION - Issue 1. - Attachment B is appended to provide a format for the interview of each of the randidates who have indicated an interest. ts4ue 2. - Selection - The Council, following interviews, will n-ed to apprint an individual for Planning commission based not cm Iv rn the persons oral presentation but also the needs as they 9 relate to the guidelines for representation from the various sectors of Orono. Lake - Name Address Area shore Sara Moos 2160 Webber Hills Rd R No Robert L Minkema 3200 Bayside Road R No Stephen M. Johnston 900 North Shore Dr. West R No Dale A. Christensen 2750 Casco Point Road U No Lester Kelly 2135 Colin Drive R No Curtis Quady 1223 Brown Road South U No Issue 3. - Designation - Technically none of the existing Planning Commission members are lakeshore owners. To the extent that the individual desired is from an "Urban" area the Council may choose to re -designate one of the three "At Large" candidates all of whom are in the "Rural" area to achieve the guidelines for designation. Selection of a "Rural" designee would leave the Commission with its present composition of 3 "At Large", 3 "Rural" and 1 "Urban". ALTERNATIVES - I_s_su_e_ 1. interview - 1. Conduct and conclude the interviews tonight 2. Continue the interview for a later meeting Issue 2. Se_lection - A. Make a selection following completion of interviews B. Table selection until the May 9th meeting C. Table until another mp% ing D. Ask for further applications is_s_u_e_ 3. Redebignatiun A. Designate current members as needed following selection tonight +�. Table to determine `f it will be required following selection at a su::.Y ^ nt meeting RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that following the interviews ihaE't_he Council table any selection until the May 9th meeting as an appointment at either this meeting or the next meeting will still have an appointment in place by the Planning Commission's May 16th Planning Commission meeting. (The tentative meel.ing scheduled for the 2nd will not need to take place.) That the Council defer any redesignation until such time as a selection is made. PROPOSED MCTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the Council following the interviews table selection of a candidate until the May 9, 1988 Council meeting. Ayes , Nays 2 March 21, 1988 Dear Mr. Bernhardson, I am very interested in being considered for the position on the Orono Planning Commission created by the resigning of Paul Taylor. I think the next three to five years are critical for an organ- ized development of Orono. Orono has always had very high standards for growth and I think, an attitude of "grow slowly". I happen to agree. I would like to see Orono maintain a rural flavor, yet know that growth is inevitable. With the Highway 12/394 completion looming in the near future, the influx of people into the community is already being felt. I would like to see a very controlled growth to keep the standard of living and the quality of life high. I grew up in Deephaven, moved out to Salt Lake City to attend the University of Utah. After graduating with a B.S. in Recreational 'iherapy, I became the Director of Adolescent Recreational Therapy at IDS Hospital. My husband and I moved back to Minnesota in November 1981 and purchased our house in Webber Hills in August of 1982. At that time I was working for Merrill Lynch Realty/P,utnet in Wayzata. For the past few years I have been raising two children and working part time with Betty Jo Ogren at the Five Swans. I have also been a block worker for the Americzn Heart Association for the past two years. I think the environment that we live in is going to play an ever increasing role in our lives. I know from personal and career experiences that the home/neighborhood environment is critical to a balanced life. I would like to work hard at keeping Orono a fabulous corm ".ty to live and raise my children in. Orono has a reputation for an excellent quality of living and I would be honored to help maintain this by serving on the Orono Planning Commission. Thank you for your time, if there are any questions please ci11 me. Sincerely, Sara Moos -- o21 O lver- r--? IIu lot ) AY Z #,* ► -A� ,�-Q Wo 2 5 1988 1 March 22, 1988 City Council P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RE: Open Position on Planning Commission Dear Council: I would like to be considered for the open position on the planning commission. I am moving into the area on April 1, 1988, and would like to get involved in the local government as soon as possible. Having grown up in the area and attended Orono school's I feel that I know what the vision the area. Personal Information Address 3200 Bayside Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Telephone 476-0508 (Home) 542-8846 (Office) Married with a child on the way. Employer Robert L. Minkema, CPA, Ltd. 7515 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 232 St. Louis Park, MN 55426 I have been involved in local government from the accounting and auditing aspect for the past eight years. I would be happy to answer any questions the council may have. Thank you. Sincerely, Robert L. Minkema March 29, 1988 The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Orono c/o Ms. Jean Mabusth P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Planning Commission Vacancy Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: p �c�;ae� I wish to be considered for the current vacancy on Orono's Planning Commission. I feel that my education, knowledge, experience and enthusiasm will allow me to serve the needs of the community. Listed below are some of these attributes as well as a brief personal summary. My wife and I are new residents of Orono, having moved here in February from Maple Grove. We looked at many homesites and cities before selecting our lot in Orono to raise our future family. Few cities had the combination of natural amenities and quality developments that we were looking for in a hometown. It is my hope that I can help to preserve and promote these qualities through service on the Orono Planning Commission. I am a 1978 graduate of Osseo High School and a 1984 graduate of the University of Minnesota's Institute of Technology. As part of my course work toward a Bachelor of Civil Engineering degree, I studied urban geography, land use planning and political science. I have successfully passed the Minnesota Professional Engineering Examination and am registered as a Professional Engineer in the State of Minnesota. 'Phis background, along with my technical education, will be of benefit to me if I am selected to serve on the Planning Commission. My current employer is Merila and Associates, a civil engineering, surveying and site -planning firm. Our clients include numerous residential, commercial, and industrial developers, as well as the cities of Minnetonka, Brooklyn Park, and Maple Grove. Although I personally work on a variety of projects, my expertise is the design of residential developments. t routinely supervise these projects from site analysis through lot layout, grading, utilities, paving, government agency approvals and, ultimately, construction. I have designed developments in the c:.ies of Plymouth, Maple Grove, Brooklyn Park, Champlin, Yugo, Centerville, Chaska, Eagan and Oakdale, all of which required presentations to City Councils and Planning Commissions. Prior to working for Merila and Associates, I was employed by the City of Maple Grove for five years. My duties in the engineering department included project design, site and grading plan reviews, traffic studies, staff reports to the City Council and Planning Commission, assessment roles, and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding applications. The position required extensive coordination with other departments such as Community Development, as well as direct contact with residents. I feel that my career experiences would be valuable to your Planning Commission, and trust that my application will be given full consideration for the current vacancy. If any additional information would be helpful, please do not hesitate to contact me at 533-7595 (days) or 472-8007 (evenings). I look forward to meeting and discussing my qualifications with you. Sincerelv, 4, , Ste hen M. Johnston 900 North Shore Drive West Mound, MN 55364 Hark Bernhard5o►►, City F,ar,►ini5tc atar Box 66 Crystal Bay, iiii 55323 l.rat i1ic . BeL nhcxc dson : 3,3188 I am suumittiny a ocIrf ce5ume ii, CcSpunc:r to the nuilcr for an opening on the Orono Planning Curwilasion. I am i►►ce estea in serving but have had no prior e.xpurience iu such uwatte s. Sincerely, Z,alr A. Ch►astensen 2750 Casco Pt. Rd. Wayzata, I -IN 55301 i Wlft 3 i oe Dale A. Chr i5tenyeii 2750 CdSco Pt. PV. Wayzata, I-Ni 35391 1g83-1988 (612)-471-79; 1 Professional Background Pilot Production Manager and CA Maridyer for Guvernmerit-- Contract Pesearch Projects Biu-Metric Sy��tems,Inc..cden i?rarie,MN Oeveiupea a Cuality Assurance Plan for the company, introduced Standard Operating Procedure's to the research group, Initiated a Calibration System, and initiated NUUJUer my Systeii,s fur ducurnents, mares ►ais and par tt:.. Devised prototype Uesiyns of sraillI hand-held enzymeirranuno- assay diagnostic test devises and developed serr,l-autu,,iated machines for assembly purposes. Deve l r.p.eu 'n-depth control procedures for monitoring the processing of immooilized enzymes and antiuutlies. i974-1o83 VOL iuus positions, inui.avi11y: Technicai Director Lu Nify. aiiu PruauCLiun DevelvpmeuL DirecLut Kaliestad Laboratories,Inc.,Chaska,MN NuiUed research developments into products (e.g.radloimmuno- assay kits). TrouUIe-shuoterr on ptoduction p:obiernts 146')- i a7-i Technical positions ill Ca l i f Ur i s anu i i l i rlOi s Education i QS-; D i p i urrla Pr uc L ur H.S. Pt uc t ur , NN ioD�� B.A. Jewi. CC Z; agi ish Majut , U. of Mien. , Duluth 1465 M.S. degree Biochemistry, U. of I;inn., St. Paul Special Interests I like to read un a variety of subjects. My two boys and I du some fishing and camping each summer. My life, boys, and i l,Ke to travei when its possibie. -:;thrr i1.:rtrrZ'l� incivue gc).f. y, yoirig to the theatre, and yruuse hunting. i PR April 6, 1988 Mr. Mark Bernhardson City Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn. 55323 Dear Mark: The vacancy on the Orono Planning Commission is of great interest to me. I would like to help maintain the pro- fessional work that the commission has accomplished in the city of Orono. I have lived in Orono for 70 years and have served on the Park Commission for 12 years. Sincerely, Lester Kelley - .r- 10 w CA(! �2 ct, rr O d a 1-Z �QL=A C Al COX is 7 S53a3 LOOM 42088.3 PLANNING COMMISSION INTERVIEWS POSITION QOESTIONAIRF. 1. Summary of education and experience background: 2. What interested you about service on the Planning Commission: optional 3. Have you had an opportunity to: a.) Attend a Planning Commission meeting b.) Review the Comprehensive Plan c.) Review the Zoning Code 4. Are you familiar with the meeting schedule and Planning Commission duties. 1988 DIREBM CTORY OF CITY OFFICIALS AND PLOYMS �R� %1 ISCp' PHONE NUMBERS SINESS RESIDENCE NAME 6 TITLE TERM ADDRESS DU ?lanning Commission Charles Kelley (Cha3.. 3-31-89 Rural 2720 White Oak Circle Long Lake, MN 55356 Maureen Bellows (Vice -Chair) 265 South Brown Road 3-31-89 At Large Long Lake, MN 55356 Paul Taylor 3075 Farview Lane 3-31-89 Rural Long Lake, MN 55356 Jim Hanson 3-31-91 At Large Edward M. Cohen 3-31-91 At Large Jeffrey Johnson 3-31-90 Urban Edward C. Brown III 3-31-90 884 Dakota Avenue Long Lake, MN 55356 519 N. Fernda'a Road Wayzata, MN 55391 3825 Cherry Avenue Mound, MN 55.64 355 N. Stubbs Bay Road Long Lake, MN 55356 w •7, f 11487.2 TO: 'tay(i in.1 City Counoi1 t PROM: stark Bernhardson, City Administratur DATE: January 14, 1987 SUBJECT: 1987 Appointments - Council - Planning Commission - Park Commission - Miscellaneous AttaChlnP nt: A. Luttera to Vuriou.: A(.pIlLintu B. Leu Sc:iacht kusumu l .. &,dr- INGi 11-87 U t i U: OR= ISSUE - 11akii.3 appropriate appointi-,ents for the above listed 0 ff ices. hISCL'SSIoti - At your last meeting Council interviewed candidates for the positions of Council, Planning Commission and Park Commission. In addition you direct^d t:,at staff send a letter to tho:,e not able to attend, directing them to contact you if they had a farther interest. Copies of these letters are attached. COUNCIL - The balai.ce of the vacancy created by the elec on of Jim Grabek as Mayor is to be filled by appointing -) the renaining term for Council, which expires at the end 19e9. InteresteJ candidates include: Ed Callahan (U) Julie Harren (R) Charles Kelley (R) Mariann Kienzler (R) Gary Printup (U) Earl Dorn (R) Edward C. Drown III (R) Thomas Casey (U) The individual appointed may be sworn in at yourCouncil .ieeting February 23, 1987. PLANNING C0:'MIS!:I011 - Individual:: who remain interested in the position are as follows: Curtis Quady (U) James C. Berg (U) Lee E. Schacht (R) Jeffrey J ohn[;on (U Edwdrd M. Cohen (R) Gsil Livingston Jorja ',nn (R) Clement F. Birch, Jr. (Q1. ,. vacancies are two urbane for a three year term and ;or a one year term. ,Is I 70u will also recall the following capacities:'"_ people are serving in the Charles Kelley (R) - Rural Pau; Taylor (R) - Rural Jin Han3on (R) - At Large Maureen nellows (R) - At Large By ordinance appointees must be 2 urban, 2 rural and 3 at large for a total of 7 reembers. parenthesis.) All continuing members on the COmmis:ilGn are from the rural area. The split is based on availability of sewer service. Shoulu you desire to change, you could do 10 by ordin&ace amendment. (Since individuals who applied for all vacancies were asked if they would serve in other capacities, their designation urban/rural is noted in PARK Cot''dI"'SI011 - I,s you Will recall two vacancies exist, the inTj'v1jUaTS interested are as follows: - Lee Erger (Incumbant) (U) Ron Anderson (u) Bruce Kokal (R) Appointments for these positions will be for e year Additionally 'terry Morse should be formally reap,,_.nted. tee,. ttISCELLANEOUS - 1s you will recall there were four other appo ntT ments 'that remain to be made tc complete the list for Iq '. These are as follows; Ac* iaq Mayor Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Mire Ch-j r Alternate Attorney - William Soth, Dor3ey i Whitney - Mr. rzottr is the City Attorney for St. Anthony, Woodland and Deephaven and is familiar .,ith lake issues. This is only •".ilized in the case of a Conflict of interest by tt ty•s primary tirm Popham, Haik. The appointmeit foi ,an Relatilns was also up and it's recommended that this be discontinuted at this ti-le, given the fact that they have •lut meet ill three years and thero is no statutory requirement that they continue. RECnllMENDATIONS - It is recommended that the appointments be made an "ppointi'ents for miscellaneous be incorporated in the attached resolutLon. 2 ''kOPO: VD MOTION - ";oved i y , sec(,nded b nakes 'he appointinents a:: follows: y that the Council Council Planning CCoom ssi;)n �_� two year terms and for a one year tern Park--M)m—mTssion - Terry Morse, and together with adopting aresolut on aEpoi ting various for 1987. Ayes _, Nays Po—sitions 3 0. -.r,tr. . TO. Mryor and City Council ��ssl DATE: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratortl` 1`v PATE: December 29, 1996 500J[CT: Planning and Park Commission Yscsnciss Attachment: A. Letters of Intent 122956.5 rz-41)a NEE �yJ�AyN 12 607 C OF , _.I 'I ISSUE - Appointment of individusls to fill vscanOlea on the ilannlog and Park Commissions. INTRODUCTION - The staff has placed is the four local newspapers togethe with sending letters regarding the vsoasoles to Parr Commissioners and individuals on the Planning Commission who$ appointment is up. Attachment A are the letters of the individuals who have indicated an interest. They are &a follows: Planning Commission Curtis Quady Jones C. Berg, Lee E. Schacht Jeffrey Johnson Edward M. Cohen Gail Livingston Jorja Lynn Carol Moore Trapp Clement F. Birch, Jr. Park Commission Bruce Eokal Ronald C. Anderson Lae ' rger pol *re are currently three vacancies on the Plisning Commission f two vacancies or the Park Commission with Lee Erger on the a rk Commission being the only "incumbent" indicating on interest In re -appointment r Staff requested all those Interested in Plan_nint Commmission to be available at 6:30 and those for ►ark Coi■ si sion Lt .M. BECOMMENDAT;ON - It is staff'• recommendation that based on reiuees and follo�ing interview& by ths Council that appolntmeata be maueat the F -.7uary 9. 1987 meeting. PROPOSED MOTION - Mcred by _. ssconJed by _. that the COwn011 make appointments to both the Park arl Planning CoMissioaa from the names listed above at its February Q. 1907 meeting. Also gay); TO Mayor and City Council • �` lMt Mark sernhardson, City Administrator DATES lebruary 19, 1907 W11 r "yam ; am I .Planning commission Appointments �`,` � '• ISSUs - Appointment of one additional memboi to INTRODUCTION - At yGur last meeting you appointed Rd Cohen and - Jeffrey Jo neon as representatives to the Planning Commission., • '' `j� '� tulfillinq of a third vacancy was tabled until the rebruary 23, 1907 meeting. DISCUSSION - The vacancy that exists carr.•:s the urban Des na-`Lion. Candidates who have applied includes ,r 3ames Berg (U) Jor ja Lynn (R) Clement Birch (U) Gail Livingston (R) Curt Quady (U) Lee Schacht (R) Persons who had applied for Council who may be interested in the, t Planning Commission appointment includes Gary Print-jp (U) Julie Aarren (R) Thomas Casey (U) Earl Dorn (R) Ed Brown III (R) Mariann Reintler (R) Currently on Park Commission Additionally Ron Anderson (U) .iad applied, but was not appointed, to the Park Commission. 'tt i 3287.12 ORDINANCE NUMBER 31, SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE SECTION 2.50 ENTITLED BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS GENERALLY AND SECTION 2.51, ENTITLED PLANNING COMMISSION, SUBD. 1. The City Council of the City of Orono ardains: Section 2.50 and entitled Boards and Commissions Generally is amended to read: All Board and Commission appointments authorized by ordinance shall be made by the Council at the first regular meeting in January of each year un?ess another Pppointment date is established elsewhere in ordinance. The term of each appointee shall be established and stated at the time of his appointment, and terms of present Board and Commission members may be re-established and changed so as to give effect to this Section. New appointees shall assume office immediately. Provided, however, that all appointees to Board:; and Commissions shall hol,3 oftice until their successor is appoin�ed and qualified. All vacancies shall be filled in the same manner as for an expired term; but the appointment shall be only for the unexpired term. Nu appointed Board or Commission member shall be an employee of the City, but an ex officio member may be sc employed. All appointed Board and Commission memhers shall serve without remuneration, but may be reimbursed for out-of-pr)cket expenses incurred in the performance of their duties when such expenses have been authorized by the Council before they were incurred. The officers shall be appointed by the Council annually. Any Board or Commission member may be removed by the Council for any reason and his position filled as any other vacancy. Each Board and Commission shall hold its regular meetings at a time established and approvel by the Council. Boards and Commissioi,s created by resolution shall terminate when the purpose for which they were created has been accomplished or upon the expiration of the terms stated in the resolution. Except as otherwise provided, this Section shall apply to all Board; and Commissions. Section 2.51 and entitled Planning Commission is amended to read: Subd. 1. A Planning Commission composed of -even members, who serve staggered 3 year terms is hereby est Fished. The period of these terms is from 1 April to 31 March a„,: shall be appointed by the 2nd business meeting in March. It is the policy of the Council to appoint persons to the Planning Commission as follows: Two of the members shall reside in and be appointed to represent the Rural Service Area of the City as defined in the Comprehensive Management Plan, two members residing in and appointed to represent tl,u Urban Service Area, one appointed that resides on Lake Minnetonka lake shore property and two shall be appointed to represent the City At Large. The Council by majority vote may deviate from this policy to appoint persons without specific designation. The Zoning Administrator and one Council member shall be members of the Commission ex officio and without von This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication on March 30, 1987. Passed by the Council this 17th day of March, 1987. c= ---L'Sj�e� Jam s R. Gra e , Mayor Published in the Laker and Pioneer ►.ewspaper the week of March 30, 1987. 2 § 2.50 SEC. 2.50. BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS GENERALLY. All Board and Commission appointments authorized by ordinance cr resolution shall be made by the Council at the first regular meeting in January of each year. The term of each appointee shall be established and stated at the time of his appointment, and terms of p7-sf7nt Board and Commission members may be re-established and changed so as to give effect to this Section. New appointees shall assume office immediately. Provided, however, that all appointees to Boards and Commissions shall hold office until their successor is appointed and qualified. All vacancies shall be filled in the same manner as for an expired term, but the appointment shall be only for the unexpired term. No appointed Board or Commission member shall be an employee of the City, but an ex off icio member may be so employed. All appointed Board and 2onmission members shall serve without remuneration, but may be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in the performance of their duties when such expenses have been authorized by the Council before they were incurred. The officers shall be appointed by the Council annually. Any Board or Commission member may be removed by the Council for any reason and his position filled as any other vacancy. Each Board and Commission shall hold its regular meetings at a time established and approved by the Council. Boards and Commissions created by resolution shall terminate when the purpose for which they were created has been accomplished or upon the expiration of the terms stated in the resolution. Except as otherwise provided, this Section shall apply to all Boards and Commissions. SEC. 2.51, PLANNING COMMISSION. Stibd. 1. Establishment and Composition. IL Planning Commission composed of seven members, who shall serve staggered three-year terms, is hereby established. Two of the members shall reside in and be appointed to represent the Rural Service Area of t'iie City, as def fined in the Comprehensive Community Managemc,nt Plan, two members shall reside in and be appointed to represent the Urban Service Area of the City, and three members shall be appointed to represent the City at -large. The Zoning Administrator and one Council member shall be members of the Commission ex officio and without vote. Subd. 2. Powers and Duties. The Planning Commission shall be the Planning Agency of the City and be an advisory body to the Council. The Commission shall have the power, under the direction of the Council, to carry on the duties set forth in Minnesota Statutes, and those duties provided by this Code and such other duties as prescribed by the Council from time to time. The Commission shall hold a regular meeting once eac` month and keep records of its proceedings. ORONO CC 17 (4-1-F4) 41588.3 j TO: Mayor and City rounc i l r,P2 5 FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: April 15, .1.988 SUBJECT: Wayzata Comn:unity Education Appointment Attachment: %. Wayzata School District Letter Dated 3/14/88 B. Scnool District Boundaries - City of Orono ISSUE 1. Determination as to how the City of Orono desires to fill its specified vacancy on the Wayzata School District Community Education Board. INTRODUCTION - The City of Orono apparently has one appointment to_the_Wayzata Community Education Board given the area of Orono that is in the District. The Community Education Board is primarily responsible for other than the K through 12 education put on by the School District, such as adult education, special interest classes outside regilar hours, etc. This is the first time that an appointment to a Community Education Board has been brought to the City's attenticn in the last three years. ALTERNATIVES - 1. Selection as Mr. Gerber as the Orono designee on this Board. 2. Advertise and seek other individuals who may be interested. 3. Table for further discussion. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that Mr. Gerber be selected to- _Orono'_s_ vacancy on this Board. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that Mr. Walter Gerber be the appointee for the City of Orono to the Wayzata Community Education Board. Ayes , Nays cc: Walter Gerber Wayzata School District 1 wa,y, ta PUBLIC SCHOOLS Independent School District 284 Community EducL.;ion Services 210 State Hwy. 101 North, P.O. Box 660, Wayzata, MN 55391-9990 (612) 476.3200 March 14, 1988 Honorable Jarmes Grabek City of Orono 1335 Brown Road So. Long Lake, MN 55356 Dear Mayor Grabek, I wish to express my gratitude to you and the Orono City Council for your continuing support of Community Education in the Wayzata School District. Since Leesee Meyer, your appointed representative on the Advisory Council resigned, we have to representation from the City of Orono. By chance Walter Gerb,_c, an architect whose business is located in Wayzata moved out of the Wayzata School District into the Orono School District. Walt has indicated that he would like to fill the opening left by Leesee. Walt's appointment would'be for a three year term beginninj on July 1, 1988 and continue through June 30th, 1991. In order to properly inservice all new members on the council, I would appreciate your action in appointing Walt at your May meeting. This would enable us to invite the new city appointees to our June 8th, 1988 general Advisory Council meeting. Your prompt action in this matter is greatly appreciated. Waiting your decision I am, Sincerely, Jim Brand�� \ JB/=1 1-17 DOW TOO �1 11 MWZATA - 1 PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS 276 MINNETRISTA SCHOOL DISTRICT 277 WESTO:KA SCHOOL DISTRICT 278 ORONO SCHOOL DISTRICT 284 WAYZATA SCHOOL DISTRICT mff� City of Orono, Minnesota 11 GQkL SE MNG DRAFT 4/20/88 crrY OF o:c0 AND rwlac E. El M41ARDSON CITY AnNTNISTRh7UR 1 MAY 1988 - 30 APRIL 1989 187 S40 - 1997 Council Strategic Planning Short Term Objective '88 S4C' - 1988 Short Term Objective AREA (GOAL AIM G JFI7PIWS DkIn s "M 1. COMMUNITY DENEILPMIf:W Highway 12 '87 S'[O A. Canprehensive Plan Amendment 12 IS/87) Receive back from Met Courxi1 5/15/88 EttenBien j 1/15 granted to Metro Coiacil following 4/8/88 meeting re: Urban lard demands Final plan approval 6./15,/88 Zoning Amenrtments - Draft 6/15/88 Currently being drafted Ir - Planning Commission 7/1/88 consideration '�- - Council consideration. 8/10/88 -.6 ( Negotiations cn utilities ' N (I.arq take-ftdina) 6 VT M 88 SIT) B. Corridor Selection Surly Ad Hoc Task Force 10/1/88 Ad Hoc Task Force - 1st meeting �'68, cis i � '-r ,.:ete Phase 1 W L ARM (XRL AM CBTRTMES DAM S' 7w 1. COM I'N rn DEVF-APWVr crnt . Navarre Redevelopment '88 STn Engage ccnsultants 3/25/88 requested quotation - Planning To be determined from J. Shardlcw regarding cost to - Legal do master plan development for area Initiate Goal/Jb3ective 101!88 Setting process '88 STD Consider tM formation 6/15/88 2/88 Request Attorney outline Solicite ideab/proposals process required to establish Commence if Decide to do 9/Ii88 3/l/88 received outlines for establishment of RRA. Staff reviewing for comment 187 �,M County 15 Development Be SIM Determine desi,ed 1;'30/88 Issue of lighting to 2/22/88 local accarpanying Council meeting im:provem-nts 2/22/88 Council considers lighting Council presentation 10/26/87 to present initial rerommendat ions 11/23/87 Financing plan 5,/30/82 Conceptual approval 12/14/87 Financial revision pr-Vosed 2/22/88 3/28/88 tabled to 4/25/88 Complete constructic>rn 12/1/88 "o commence 4/15/88 '87 ST^ Csrwr,nty T7anspor stirin Plan Refine capital ireprwenent 7/1/88 88 S'm program prior to 89 budget Determine bridge replacement 8/l/88 program Continued analysis Public/Private Ongoing Evaluate Cty 116 7/1/88 3,'17/86 received request from Medina. Tv 4/2./88 meeting 87 STn Strxm Wa,er Management Plan In STO MWD comment: due 12;'12'8' 0 Atd:A aCRL AMR 11. "4.;NITY DF IFLORW" Cont. i Dxv - Directs n aal pro,rpss 2. PPOPPLTIQN 187 STC Stubbs Bay '88 STO :id Maste Markvjement DATPS STOW Review advisors/Policy bodies '7188 role/Repsonsibilicies Review i revise as necessary 9%88 staff/advisary/Paticy body process far development review 6 execution working towards service 6 results oriented "No Surprises' process Enhance effective control on 8/88 marinas Ccnplete needs assessemnt 2/88 Project feasibility-coimence 5;188 Determine assessment ar,,i 8/88 interest Financing options 10/8B Consider devrlopment moratorium 10,188 If Aitr riate - initiate projvt 10/88 - Project bid 10,188 - oarxence proji—t 12/88 - Assess project 8./89 - Complete project 10/89 Assess recycling efforts to goal 6/88 A-scss other avenues to meet goals 6/88 including local composting Review regulations reoarding 9/88 solid waste Explore--3anized collection 6/88 4/11/88 presented to Council. To be reviewed by Planning Commission Anticipate needs assessmp>nt completion 2/88 2/22/88 Information presented ARFT GCRL ARM COJELTIVlS 1RIM MAW 969 Ccuric i 1 Goal Setting Ccvvw-rce 7/88 Campletr 9/88 19AQ BoAlet process %s:;,rsd mint Ward of lit -view 4/88 Ca} i tal budget Atkipt i cal 9/88 Budget Adoption 9/26/88 1989 Legislative Prorram Complete 12/88 Team Building Staff 11/88 Council - Consider Formats 2/89 "rviertake if desired 3/89 4. SxFJICr: DELIVER:' '87 TM vacilitie5 Study 'U sin Phase II _c. :letion 6/88 Ini:.ment any roccmmerdatiaris 7,/88 commenced. '8' S'IC E"q [range Financial Policy Draft policy tc Council 7/88 2'22i88 'Initial draft cap.'.., discussed Cour-.il a -!Option 8/88 Golf Course r !lopment of business 7/87 strategy Aniasl Control Evaluate pra7roir. 3/98 Extemled service to wig Iake/Spring Park/Minnetonka Beach 1988 HSMN RESOM -S b. ?Ol �F' 'r. C t 92 COW "M ition ^_onmu,.i ty Information/ Newletter Ex,.)lure Performance Ircen• ve as addendm trn ( 13ensatirn plan Mayor's Articles Evaluation of system nags sn►Ns 8,188 Formal plan to 2/88 Formal plan and adjustments presented 2/22/88 325/88 plan adopted 4/12;88 camp worth report submitted to State Ongoing 8/88 Mayors's Article format to continue to 8/88 for next evaluaticr. 41588.6 r.7t UING TO: Mayor and City Council P•F r 2 51':.;, FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato (�to 11l+Q%i' DATE: April 15, 1988 SUBJECT: Mobile Peddler's Orlinance Amendment Attachments: A. O-finance No. 5.30 ift Amendment - Tom Barrett ISSUE - Considet�r.ion for adoption of language related to and inclusion of certa n classes of peddlers and transient merchants under its licensing provisions. INTRODUCTION - As the Counc i 1's April 1 1 , 1988 council meeting staff wa_s directed to develop ordinance language for the inclusion of certain types of mobile peddlers whu were not presently not included under its solicitor's ordinance. DISCUSSION - The City Attorney has drafted language in Attachment B for inclusion of merchants who market their wares either from vehicles or on other pieces of property together with an amendment to limit such sales specifically to commercial pieces of property. ALTERNATIVES 1. Adopt as drafted. 2. Amend and adopt. 3. Table. 4. Choose not to incline this type of merchant for regulation. RECOMMENnFTION - It is recommended that Attachment N be adopted as presP(ited io regulate this class of transient me.chants and peddlers. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by that the Council adopt Ordinance No. Second Series as an amendment to Ordinance No. to regulate select classes of solicitors. Ayes , Nays § 5.30 SEC. 5.30. SOLICITORS. Subd. 1. Purpose. This Section is not intended to in any way hinder, delay or interfere with legitimate business or organizational activities. The Council finds, however, that soli- citors have used public streets and their direct contact with residents of the City for the illegitimate solicitation practices of harassment, nuisance, theft, deceit, or menacing, troublesome or unlawful activities. This Section is intended to ferret out and control: (1) businesses and organizations using solicitation as a means of concealing unlawful activities; and, (2) businesses and organizations which, though its activities be lawful or even com- mendable, use such illegitimate practices in solicitation; and, (3) individual natural persons who, though they represent lawful busi- nesses and organizations, use such illegitimate solicitation practices; and, (4) businesses, though legitimate, which cause, or are likely to cause, a traffic hazard or other inconvenience or danger to persons or property. The Council further finds that a large number of the residents of the City are employed as their livelihood and means of support by manufacturing plants and other businesses on shifts rotating between night and day, and to disturb them during their sleeping hours for the purpose of solicitation is a source of nuisance or even harassment and should be subject to control. Subd. 2. Definitions. The following terms, as used in this Section, shall have the meanings stated: A. "Solicitor" means any person making the solicitation, including such common terms as "peddler", "transient merchant" and "canvasser". B. "Solicitee" means the person z-)licited. C. "Goods" means any tangible thing of value, but not including money, things in action or intangi.,le personal property other than merchandise certificates or coupons as herein described. The term includes such chattels as are furnizhed or used at the time of sale or subsequently in the modernization, rehabilitation, repair, alteration, improvement or construction of real property so as to become a part thereof whether or not severable therefrom. The term also includes merchandise certificates or coupons, issued by a retail seller, not redeemable in cash and to be used in their face amount in lieu of cash, in exchange for goods or services sold by s:ch seller. D. "Services" means work, labor, or services of any kind. E. "Established place" means real estate in the City owned, leased or occupied on a month -to -month or term -certain longer than sixty (60) consecutive days. The term includes a booth, compartment, or area leased or assigned during and for the length of an event or occasion. ORONO CC 1.19 (4-1-84) § 5.30 F. "Business solicitation" means an attempt by a solicitor, engaging in transactions of the same kind, to sell or distribute for a consideration any goods or services primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, when either the solicitor or person acting for him contacts the solicitee by telephone or i.n person, other than at the established place of business of soli- citor, except: (1) an attempted solicitation in which the solicitee personally knows the identity of the solicitor, the name of the business firm or organization he represents, and the iden- tity or kinds of goods, services or things of value offered; or, (2) an attempted solicitation in which the solicitee has first initiated the contact with the solicitor; or, (3) an attempted solicitation of a newspaper subscription in which the solicitor is a minor child engaged in both the delivery and sale of the news- paper; or, (4) an attempted solicitation for the sale of products of a farm or garden occupied or cultivated by the solicitor, when facts of such occupancy or cultivation are proven by the solicitor. G. "Contribution solicitation" means an attempt by a solicitor to obtain money from a solicitee for any cause or purpose, when Either the solicitor or parson acting for him con- tacts the solicitee by telephone or in person other than at the established place of meeting, business, service, or activity of the organization represented by the solicitor, except: (1) an attempted solicitation in which the solicitee personally knows the identity of the solicitor, the name of the organization he repre- sents, and the identity of the services performed or offered by the organization, or, (2) an attempted solicitation in which the soli- citee has first initiated the contact with the solicitor or the organization represented by him. Subd. 3. Prohibited Solicitation Practices. A. It is unlawful for any solicitor to engage in solicitation for any unlawful business or organizational purpose or activity. B. It is unlawful for any solicitor to practice harassment, nuisance, theft, deceit, or menacing, troublesome or otherwise unlawful activities during the course of solicitation. C. It is unlawful for any solicitor to enter, or attempt to gain entrance, to reFidential premises displaying at such entrance a sign with the words "Peddlers and Solicitors Prohibited" or "Solicitors Prohibited". D. It is unlawful for any solicitor to refuse to leave business premises when requested by the owner, lessee, or person in charge thereof. E. It is unlawful for any person to engage 'n contribution solicitation without completion of licensing or registration as herein provided. F. It is unlawful for any person to engage in business solicitation without a license as herein provided. ORONO CC 120 (4-1-84) S 5.30 Subd. 4. Application. Applications for licensing or registration shall contain the name and address of the solicitor, the name and address of the business or organization for which solicitations are sought and such other information as may reasonably be required by the Council as a condition to registration or licensing or to permit investigation into the applicant's background and past solicitation practices. Subd. 5. Investigation, Approval or Disapproval. A. All applications for licensing or registration shall be immediately referred to the Chief of Police, and by him or other person acting in his stead, investigated as to the truth thereof, and as to any other factor which may result in a hazard or danger to persons or property. The Chief of Police shall have five (5) business days within which to investigate and make a recommendation thereon. B. If he finds no past history of the applicant indicating violations similar to those declared unlawful in this Section, and if he finds that to grant the application is not likely to result in a hazard or danger to persons or property, he shall recommend issuing a license or approving registration, as the case may be, and the City Clerk shall forthwith advise the applicant. The City Clerk shall issue a license, upon payment of the fee therefor, to the approved applicant for business solicitation, and shall approve the completion of registration by the applicant for a contribution solicitor. C. If the Chief of Police finds a past history of the applicant indicting violations similar to those declared unlawful in this Section, or if he finds that to grant the applica- tion is likely to result in a hazard or danger to persons or property, he shall recommend denial of the license or registration. In all matters of recommended denial the applicant shall be forth- with advised thereof, and the application shall be referred to the Council and considered by it at its next regular or special meeting occurring more than ten (10) days thereafter. The applicant shal�. be afforded an opportunity to be heard at such meeting. Subd. 6. Duration of Contribition Solicitation Registration. Registration of contribution solicitation shall expire sixty (60) days after registration is approved. Source: City Code Effective Date: 4-1-84 (Sections 5.31 through 5.34, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.) ORONO CC 121 (4-1-84) W M rn . . - w . . - _i q •.O fo - _ jj� _. ap-f R•♦�Da tV ems. tea,.♦i" �• - rid 06 Ll Point G 0 Op RFE-h AVE.1-=-T--"� 1� OR DEL �,;,- H� d�C I a Q cr sew co Ut� G117 JL � O rn _ C7 L� /' — .ley` //'/ 1. _ +,"„ � j ..��►.w _—�."... •i 1 {jam' fry `•- r ..:',-� .7/.' � W l .. --•sue .... ,Y.•► tiro " - '7- its • LR-1C LR-IC-I see $to ■ W, ZOt1ESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERUK W, i AS, IK• CONSaTN4 EMGOERS St. PWI, Wies t' p,a nMt6 tM t+a. a� ,.r.,era er : w 4l, airtts. �Ms MO�nM•ttp4.� t. )b I�IV ON -aft • : G►Ainau�� 701, ow 0►6•na^ce 706, ]anima,! 9. 1v1N Ordinance "a•` la. 19;� p "", 226, Fwaruarl � 2 1N 0,e,oaata 236. Cwuac, INSERT NAVARRE AREA DETAIL MAP 9 REVISED: N 0v 4 1980 FEB 15, 1981 SEPT. 15,1983 AUG 28, 1984 w 11 ROM 1< c,r,.gM "last ISBERG RIESENBERG an ASSOCIATES INC. l 4 5.au SEC. 5.30. SOLICITOR AN_Q__.TRAN5ICNT_MERC11ANT'5. Subd. 1. Purpose. This Sectior, is not intended to in any way hinder, delay or interfere with legitimate business or organizational activities. The Council finds, however, that solicitors have used public streets and their direct contact with residents of the City for the illegitimate solicitation practices of harassment, nuisance, theft, deceit, or menacing, troublesome or unlawful activities. This Section is intended to ferret out and control: (1) businesses and organizations using solicitation as a means of concealing unlawful activities; and, (2) businesses and organizations which, though its activities be lawful or even commendable, use such illegitimate practices in solicitation; and, (3) individual natural persons who, though they represent lawful businesses and organizations, use such illegitimate solicitation practices; and, (4) businesses send _tX_aIfs ent__.mexch_anta, though legitimate, which cause, or are likely to cause, a traffic hazard or other inconvenience or danger to persons or property. The Council further finds that a large number of the residents of the City are employed as their livelihood and means of support by manufacturing plants and other businesses on shifts rotating between night and day; and to disturb them during their sleeping hours for the purpose of solicitation is a source of nuisance or even harassment and should be subject to control. Subd. 2. Definitions. The following terms, as used in this Section, shall have the meanings stated: A. "Solicitor" means any person making the solicitation, including such common terms as "peddler", "transient merchent" and "canvasser". B. "Solicitee" means the person solicited. C. "Goods" means any tangible thing of value, but not including money, things in action or intangible personal property other than merchandise certificates or coupons as herein described. The term includes such chattels as are furnished or used at the time of sale or subsequently in the modernization, rehabilitation, repair, alteration, improvement or construction of real property so as to become a part thereof whether or not severable therefrom. The term also includes merchandise certificates or coupons, issued by a retail seller, not redeemable it cash and to be used in their face amount in lieu of cash, in exchange for goods or services :-)ld by such seller. any kind. D. "Services" means work, labor, or services of E. "Established pl..,(-" means real estate in the City owned, leased or occupied or —Oh-to-month or term -certain longer than sixty (60) consecuti%t The term includes a booth, compartrt,-4nt, or area lease, i_,.iigned during and for the length of an event or occasion. ORONO CC 119 (4-1-84) § 5.30 F. "Business solicitation" means an attempt by solicitor, engaging in transactions of the same kind, to sell or distribute for a consideration any goods or services primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, when either the solicitor or person acting for him contacts the solicitee by telephone or in person, other than at the established place of business of solicitor, except: (1) an attempted solicitation in which the Eolicitee personally knows the identity of the solicitor, the name of the business firm or organization he represents, and the idenLiLl' or kinds of goods, services or things of value offered; or, (2) a:► attempted solicitation in which the solicitee has firs initiated the contact with the solicitor; or, (3) an attempted solicitation of a newspaper subscription in which the solicitor is a minor child engaged in both the delivery and sale of the newspaper; or, (4) an attempted solicitation for the sale of products of a farm or garden occupied or cultivated by the solicitor, when facts of such occupancy or cultivation are proven by the solicitor. G. "Contribution solicitation" means an attempt by a solicitor to obtain money from a solicitee for any cause or purpose, when either the solicitor or person acting for him contacts the solicitee by telephone or in person other than at the established place of meeting, business, service, or activity of the organization represented by the solicitor, except: (1) an attempted solicitation in which the solicitee personally knows the identity of the solicitor, the name of the organization he represents, and the identity of the services performed or offered by the organization, or, (2) an attempted solicitation in which the solicitee has first initiated the contact with the solicitor or the organization represented by him. 11. "Transient._KerQh.antA"iyities-"__s►lea.na-angaging irl_.11.ny tempoCalY. inteLmiLteAt. or 1.r_a_ulent4r dny g9osi; �_�Lal_e.Y.�.QL services by se.tt' up any outdooi—a�nA-Qk a n v --tillr-h.--aALto o bi-1-e- oI_any other yehicle...at any point or place in the_.City1 1_1 "Tr,.I-IIS.iellt__MQ.Lchant" means--ai.ny--VexzQn engaaina . in transient Subd. 3. Prohibited Solicitation _and_'ransie_nt Me Leh_dllt_ Practices . A. It is unlawful for any solicitor to engage in solicitation for any unlawful business or organizational purpose or activity. B. It is unlawful for any solicitor or_.tLan-i`+<l-t merchant to practice harassment, nuisance, theft, deceit, or menacing, troublesome or otherwise unlawful activities during the course of solicitation ._o txangi,e.nt merchant,_rj:ly-it.ina- § 5.30 C. It is unlawful for any solicitor to enter, or attempt to gain entrance, to residential premises displaying at such entrarce a sign with the words "Peddlers arid Solicitors Prohibited" or "Solicitors Prohibited". D. It is unlawful for any solicitor to refuse to leave business premises when requested by the owner, lessee, or person in charge thereof. E. It is unlawful for any person to engage in contribution solicitation without completion of licensing or registration as herein provided. F. It is unlawful for any person to engage in business solicitation or transient merchant activities without a license as herein provided. G. Tansient merchants activities can only be conducted on commercially zoned properties. § 5.30 Subd. 4. Application. Applications for s._olicit.or_and transient metch-ant licensing or registration shall contain the n.aine and address of the solicitor_or t Ds�.�.Ilt_[Derch_ant, YK¢ riaalt/�rSal/�ddtt�d/0f/YKd/MSdglrftK�d/0t/Ot�JA►1t�KY1A►1/fdt/rdKi�K d0I1KtY�YtOlfa/Ktd/dOd�KY and such other information as may reasonably be required by the Council as a condition to registration or licensing or to permit investigation into the applicant's background and past solicitation practices QI_ t.tanliient-mexchant_actiyi-UeT,—Ap-lications lr.ena n9 name .and__sidd.re-as-of the business or--organizationQj--Qjganization for which solicitations are sought, Subd. 5. Investigation, Approval or Disapp-oval. A. All applications .:)r licensing or registration shall be immediately referred to the Chief of Police, are'+ I iim or - other person acting in his stead, investigated as to 1,,= truth thereof, and as to any other factor which may result in a hazard or danger to persons or property. The Chief of Police shall have five (5: business days within which to investigate and make a recommendation thereon. B. If he finds no past history of the applicant indicating violations simi'ir to those declared unlawful in this Section, and if he finds that to grant the application is not likely to result in a hazard or danger to persons or property, he shall recommend issuing a license or approving registration, as the case may be, and the City Clerk shall forthwith advise the applicant. The City Clerk shall issue a license, upon payment of the fee therefor, to the approved applicant for business solicitation_�_.t�Bs_e11.111e�o1s3_n� �C_ti.t��s, and shall approve the completion of registration by the applicant for a contribution solicitor. C. If the Chief of Police finds a past history of the applicant indicting violations similar to those declared unlawful in this Section, or if he finds that to grant the application is like); to result in a hazard or danger to persons or property, he shall recommend denial of the license or registration. In all matters of recommended denial the applicant shall be forthwith advised thereof, and the application shall be referred to the Council and considered by it at its next regular or special meeting occurring more than ten (10) days thereafter. The applicant shall be afforded an opportunity to be heard at such meetiny. Subd. 6. Duration of Contribution Solicitation Registration. Registration of contribution solicitation shall expire sixty (60) days after registration is approved. Source: City Code Effective Date: 4-1-84 (Sections 5.31 through 5.34, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.) ORONO cc 121 42188.4 ORDINANCE? NO. , SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SUBDIVISIONS 1, 2(H), 2(I), 3, 3(B), 3(F), 3 (G) , 4 and 5 (B) , OF SECTION 5.30 ADOPTED APRIL 1, 1984, AND ENTITLED "SOLICITORS" The City Council of the City of Orono ordains: Ordinance No. 5.30 Subdivisions 1, 2(H), 2(I), 3, 3(B), 3(F), 3(G), 4 and 5(B) adopted April 1, 1984 and entitled "Solicitors" is amended to read: Section 5.30. SOLICITOR AND TRANcIENT MERCHANTS Subd. 1. Purpose. This Seciton is not intended to in any way hinder, delay or interfere with legitimate business or organizational activities. The Council finds, however, that solicitors have used public streets and their direct contact with residents of the City for -tie illegitimate solicitation practices of harassment, nuisance, theft, deceit, or menacing, troublesome or unlawful activities. This Section is intended to terret out and control: (1) businesses and organizations using solicitation as a means of concealing unlawful activities; and, (2) busin-.3ses and organizations which, though its activities be lawful or even commendable, use such illegitimate practices in solicitation; and, (3) individual natural persons who, though they rear ? n t lawful business and organizations, use such iIIegi to solicitation practices; and, (4) businesses and tram ent merchants, though legitimate, which cause, or are likely to cause, a traffic hazard or other inconvenience or danger to persons or property. The Council further finds that a large number of the residents of the City are employed as their livelihood and moans of sipport by manufacturing plants and other businesses on shifts rotating between night and day, and to disturb them during their sleeping hours for the purpose of solicitation is a source of nuisance or even harassment and should be subject to control. Subdivision 2. Definitions. H. "Transient Merchaic: Nctivities" means engaging in any temporary, intermittent, or transient sales or exchanges of any goods, wares, or services by setting up any outdoor stand or structure, or by using any truck, automobile, or any other vehicle, at any point or place in the City. I. "Transient Merchant" means any pers -)n engaging in transient merchant activities. Subdivision 3. Prohibited Solicitation and Transient Merchant Practices. B. It is unlawful fr•r any solicitor or transient merc.•hant to practice harassment, n�iisance, theft, fieceit, ­r menacin:;, troublesome or otherwise unlawful activities during the course of solicitation or transient merchant activities. F. it is unlawful for any person to engage in husiness solicitation or transient merchant activities without a lincense as herein provided. (11. Transient merchant activities can only be conducte,4 nn commercially zoned properties. ,ubdivison 4. Application. Applications for solicitor and transient merchant licensing or registration shall contain the name and address of the solicitor or transient merchant and such other information as may reasonably be required by the Council as a condition to registration or licensing or to permit investigation irto the applicant's background and past solicitation practices or transient merchant activities. Application for solicitor licensing shall also contain the name and address of the business or organization for which solicitations are sought. Subdivision 5. Investigation, Approval or Disapproves.. B. If he finds no past history of the applicant indicating violations similar to those declared unlawful ii this Se-,tion, and if he finds that to grant the application i not 1 ikely to result in a hazard or danger to persons or propert he shall recommend issuing a license or approving registra io. as the case may be, and the City Clerk shall forthwith advise the applicant. The City Clerk shall issue a license, upon payment of the fee therefore, to the approved applicant for business solicitation or transient merchant activities, and shall approve the completion of registration by the applicant for a conribut:on solicitor. Passed by the Council thi3 25th day of April, 1988. Jam i- -es-- R---.G---ra-6e-i-C-- -- - _. , Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Ra-Uln, driy Clerk - Put)lished in the Laker and Pioneer newspaper the week of 2 a 41588.4 �! MuJIMG f'.PP, 2 519 &} TO: Mayor and City Council �'�` OF 61t"�AN FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato ORAN \\ll DATE: April 15, 1986 SUBJECT: City Property - Pheasant Road Sale and Easements Attachment: A. Map - Pheasant Road and Shadywood Rrad B. Easement Memo Dated 4/7/88 ISSUE - 1. Determination as to what, if any, legal acce: the City desires to provide to the owner at 2765 Pheasant Road. 2. What, if any, legal access the City desires to provide to the two other property owners abutting City owned property. 3. If thr, City choses to sell that piece of property the appropriate means to: a. Determine value b. Sell INTRODUCTION - At the Council's April 11, 1988 meeting the three property owners abutting the City's parcel outlined on Attachment A had requested the City grant non-exclusive tv all three of them over City property for access. As you wi l l recall the initial request was on the part of Mr. Messer at 2765 Pheasant Road in order to make his property marketable as his garage does not currently have a legal access on Pheasant Road. DISCUSSION - The goal cf the property owners are as follows: 1. Mr. Messer providing legal access in order to make his property more marketable. 2. rasements by abuttin; property owners who desire t-+ 1--gal ly strengthen their right of access on the City's property. The City's goal is to maintain maintenance access to easements for its utility lines and manhole at the west end of the property. ALTF.RNATIVFS - Issue 1. Access - 2765 Pheasant Road 1. Not grant an Paspment 2. Grant a non-exclusive easement over City property 3. Sell the property to Mr. Messer in return for the neressary access an(i utility easements. A. Tahle 1 a. Issue 2. Access to 2615 S_hadywood and 2755 Pheasant Road 1. _ Not grant any easement 2. Granting a non-exclusive easement 3. Sell a portion of le property to property owners 4. Direct to the private property owners to privately seek easements from Mr. Messer if all the property is sold to him. 5. Table Issue 3. If Sold - How Marketed A. Determination of Price 1. Price as an equivalent square foot..ge value for the abuttinn property owners. 2. Base price �n a non -buildable parcel and subtract the cost for an easement. 3. Determine value for a single use road. 4. Defer discussion to executive session as appropriate for land sale negotiat4on. B. Means of sale 1. Sell entire parcel 2. Split parcel among 3. Do not sell to 2655 Pheasant Road the owners C. Process 1. Notification tc abutting property owners 2. Proceed without notification RECOMMENDATION_ - It is recommended that the City explore selling thfe property to Mr. Messer in exchange for the appropriate easements on the property and that the City only d(: so at a price it determines appropriate plus the purchaser bearing all legal rf,sts for the transfer and that the abutting property owners obtain private easements from Mr. Messer. This should be contingent on notification of all property owners abutting the City property and having them respond with any objections by 10 May 1988. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the Council directs staff to undertake appropriate negotiations :or the sale of the property at a price the City determines appropriate plus purchaser paying all legal, survey and other expenses together with notifying the abutting property owners. Ayes , Nays cc: Mr. Messer, 2673 Pheasant Road Mr. Huber, 2615 Shadywood Road Mr. Cookson, 2655 Pheasant Road Mr. Indritz, Reed 6 Pond, Ltd. I N fy it 4 Ir ry • r I r A N fe art :: NY � if � •.�, ,•� w. jai .'; � '• AA T q N � I f ► Od ► •40 1 wit is }= •f AM !• I �� �jy 1: mJ ray r� ISO !' +'o� M �-Ifs •./`, ; • � • •rt„ s Y� u o� S1N9 �7N AVS NV Of .YP.7 a ;fie rip s 4lee- y 46 Y • •R to"~ • ►o,&". •.!, • • al�.It JL'OZ D3S Th: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator From: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director I.'tte: April 7, 1988 l.oject: Driveway Access Easement - 2673 & 2655 Pheasant Road and 2615 Shadywood Road ecently the City received a request from Dallas Messer, 2673 Pheasant Road for a driveway easement over City property. _'urrently the Messers and their neighbor at 26�.3 Pheasant Road are using the City property for driveway access to their property. I suggested that if we are to approve one access, we should approve both at the same time, eliminating future review and expense. The Messers have agreed to this and are therefore submitting two easement documents for approval. We have also received a request from the resident at 2615 Shadywood Road for legal access to their property over the same City property, as their rear yard is adjacent to the City property. The City currently has sanitary sewer pipes in the 40' strip, which sewer pipe serves all of the above properties. The residence at 2615 Shadywood Road has access from Shadywood Road. Recommendation: To approve vehicle access over City property for 2673 and 2655 Pheasant Road and to deny vehicle access over City property for 2615 Shadywood Road. Proposed motion moved 2nd to approve vehicle access over City property for 2673 and 2655 Pheasant Road and to deny vehicle access over City property for 2615 Shadywood Road. TO: Mayor and City Council )"Q FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator, Forwarded recommending approval subject to their payment of all city legal costs. The denial for access of 261.5 is that they have legal access on Shadywood and would probably need to be treated as a through lot if double accesses. 41588.5 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato DATE: April 15, 1988 SUBJECT: County Road 116 Attachment: A. City of Medina Letter Dated 3/15/88 B. County Road 116 Memo Dated 7/7/87 (Plus Attachments A through F only) ISSUE - CiJumM M'EANG P.PP. 2 5 19;j CITY OF ORONO 1. Determination as to whether the City desires to, at this point, consider further the issue of County Road 116. 2. If the Council desires to further consider the request of the City of Medina regarding 116 the means by which it undertakes this consideration. 3. Present documentation of information related to potential cost for the City of Orono as it would relate to construction of 116. INTRODUCTION - At the Councii's July 13, 1987 meeting they heard information presented regarding the proposed extension of County 116 south from Highway 55 to Highway 12. This request for the County Road was made because the City of Medina; a.) Desires abetter north/south access through its community, b.) It does not q-ialify for Municipal State Aid funds, and c.) The County's policy requires that the extensions be from one state highway to another state highway. There was substantial opposition generated against this proposal with attendees both from the City of Medina and the City of Orono when the Council had discussed it last summer. The Council's direction at its July 13, 198-7 meeting was that the staff bring back this issue to Council at the point that staff felt that further discussion of 116 would be in the best interest of Orono. To date there has been no ev idence to show any henef it to Orono apart from Willow Road capital costs and any impact on signalization. This item is being brought up at this time in response to Attachment A from the City of Medina and staff's belief that it is a courtesy to the City of Medina that the Council shnull -it least address whether they want to further consider tho mattf,r at this point. DISCUSSION - Since the Council's consideration last summer the 1 City of Medina has explored with the County both a possible re- routing of 116 over to Old Crystal Bay together with discussions with the County to either terminate at County 24 or County 6. The staff has been attempting to -.,-.termine the costs to the City of Orono if it were constructed a5 County State Aid Road County 116 verses the upgrades it anticipates over the next 5 or 10 years, and is presently waiting for those estimates from the County. ALTERNATIVES - Issue 1. Consideration of Is_sue 1. Agree to further consider the issue. 2. Communicate to the City of Medina that it does not desire to endorse the resolution presented at this time. 3. Table for further discussion. Tssue 2. If Consideration of fuPet_thitio_ rn -• Should the Council choose to ther c��; ider is matter. 1. Adopt the resolution. 2. Conduct a pu.)Iic information session similar to last summer's on the mat 3. Table the discu! a process for further meeting. Issue 3. Cost to Orono for Road 1.16 1. Accept informatic - .rdi•ng this. 2. Table for further cussion. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council on a preliminary consideration transmit a letter to the City of Medina indicating that it presently is not interested in supporting the resolution. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by , staff be directed to indicated to the City of Medina in writing its desire not to endorse the proposed resolution regarding County Road 116 and encourage Medina to work with the County to terminate 116 at County Road 24. Ayes , Nays cc: City of Medina CITY OF ... r., 2052 - County Road 24, Hamel, MN. 55340 March 15, 1988 City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn. 55323 Dear Mayor and Councilmembers, As you may know, Medina has approved the completion of Hennepin County Road #116 south to the Medina city line. We would like to see the completion of it to T.H. #12. The inadequate number of north -south arterial roads in the area is becoming more apparent as each of our cities experience growth and an increase in population. We would appreciate it if you would discuss this at your neAt council meeting and adopt the inclosed resolution and forward a ropy to Hennepin County. Sincerely, �r .� ; /� l �rLc. ��-✓ Mayor City of Medina CC: Greenf ield Corcoran Independence Maple Plain Long Lake ti TRA/sl encI. a'w 1, TWA rinN 0 PLANNING AND [)EVE, )PMENT o PUBLIC WORKS: 475-4643 / PUBLIC SAFETY: 473-9209 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION SUPPORTING CONSTRUC' V COUNTY ROAD #116 WHEREAS, the western portions of Hennepin County have experienced significant population growth and devel:JpTerL in the recent past unit ,;re LANected to continue to do so in the future; and WHEREAS, there exist an inadequate number of north -south arterial roadways i„ the area to accommodate present and future growth; and WHEREAS, the comprehensive plans of both the City of Medina and Hennepin County have long shown the completion of County Road #116 from T.H. 55 to T.H. 12; and WHEREAS, the proposed alignment of County Road #116 is the most practical route for a north -south arterial in the area; and WHEREAS, the City of Medina has requested Hennepin County to place the completion of County Road #116 on its five year capital improvement plan and to proceed with the project as quickly as possible; and WHEREAS, all communities in western Hennepin County will benefit from the prompt completion of the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE�'?LVED by the City of Orono that the City of Orono be on record in support f the completion of Hennepin County #116 from T.H. 55 to T.N. 12. (fated: , 1 88 Mayor ATTEST: 7787.1 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Marl: Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: July 7, 1987 SUBJECT: Extension of County 116 Public Hearing 7:00 P.M., July 13, 1987 Attachments: A.City of Medina - Orono Extension #116/Willow Memo Dated 2/4/87 B. City of Medina - Orono Extension #116/Willow Memo Dated 2/12/87 C. County 116 Memo Dated 3/2/87 D. City of Medina Letter to Medina Residents Dated 2/12/87 E. City of Medina Letter to Mark Bernhardson Dated 5/20/87 F. Letter to Henn. county Dept of Transportation Dated 6/23/87 G. Thomas Crosby Letter to Orono Council Dated 3/13/87 H. County Road 116 - Set Public Hearing Date - July 13, 1987, 7:00 P.M. Memo Dated 5/28/87 I. Petition From Medina Residents to Orono Council Dated 6/21/87 (Petition previously distributed) J. t.--nnepin County Letter Dated 7/6/87 ISSUES - Determine if the extension of County 116 from the Medina City line to Highway 12 along the current route of Willow is in the best interest of the City of Orono. INTRODUCTION - For several years the City of Medina has been lookinq for a route that generally runs north and south through the center of the community. They have looked at this issue over ten years ago, but it was dropped at that time. Medina has a population of about 2,800 and therefore under the 5,000 limit for Municipal State Aid funds. Because Medina does have a landfill in the community and because Baker Park Reserve is predominantly in their community, the expectation of them quickly developing to reach the 5,000 level is expected to take a considerable length of time. For these reasons the City of Medina again approached the County last year to see if the County would be willing to fund the balance of 116 through Medina. It is the County's feeling that they are willing to go ahead with this, but that their policy is that a County road should extend from one State Highway to another which entails extending 116 from highway 55 all the way down to Highway 12 (see map on Attachment D). Extension of County 116 - Public Hearing July 7, 1987 Page 2 of 4 The City of Medina began consideration of their project last fall and after considerable discussion and exploration of a City funded alternative for such a route it was the Medina Council's determination that they would request Hennepin County to extend County 116 through their community. (As noted in Attachment I a number of Medina residents remain opposed to this extension. Staff has informally asked that the Medina residents use only one spokesperson at the Orono public hearing to express their position.) In order for the Council to gain input particularly from those in the Willow vicinity, Council voluntarily established a public hearing for this evening at their June 8, 1987 Council meeting. As this is a County project Ted Hoffman and Bruce Polaczyk will be present to make a presentation and respond to questions from both Council and those in attendence at the public hearing. DISCUSSION - As noted above the City of Medina through this project will be able to gain a north -south route through the middle of their community where one currently does not exist. As they are not able to gain MSA funding this represents a way of paying for a substantial expense without a burden on the Medina taxpayers. (It should be noted that the County directly receives money for MSA funding that can be utilized for communities under 5,000. In addition to having the County construct the road the City of Medina does receive the benefit of having the County maintain it through their community.) The residents who are opposed to the extension in Medina have indicated their opposition in that they feel that the widening of the road through the community will negatively impact their current situation by: A. Disturbing the rural nature of the community in which they chose to live. B. Additionally generated traffic particularly expecting additional traffic coming from Highway 94 using 116 as a short cut down to the Lake Minnetonka area. The project in Orono would entail an expansion of the right-of- way from 66 feet to 80 feet with an expansion of the travelled portion by approximately 4 feet on each side south of County Road 6 to 9 feet on each side north of County Road 6. Residents i,. t affected are the three residents just north of County road 6. If a rural section of roadway is constructed in the area just north of County Road 6, the ditches would be very close to the residents' homes. Extension of County 116 - Public Hearing July 7, 1987 Page 3 of 4 Advantages Orono could seek in this matter would be: A. Installation of at least a 4 way stop at County Road 6 and Willow be-4-t-. B. The installation of a stop light at Highway 12 and Willow to improve the situation that has been of some concern for a number of years. (Part of the Highway 12 corridor study was installation of a traffic light at Willow as part of the development and this project may put that on line more expeditiously with a different funding arrangement.) The Highway 12 issue is one of: A. Timing - Will the approval of the project speed placement of a stop light on Highway 12 B. Cost Sharing - Will the cost sharing of the light - en the fact that Willow Drive would now be a County Roe.: be better than if left as a City street. The County presently is proposing stop signs for traffic control at both County Road 6 and Highway 12. C. Removal of approximately 3/4 of a mile from the City's Municipal State Aid System for mainte.iance and snow plowing, and allows the City to, if desired, designate other areas for the MSA road fund monies. Concerns related to the extension include: A. Impact of the width principally for the residents on the north side of County 6, but to a lesser degree those to the south depending on which way the improvement is made from the current center line. B. Amount of traffic expected to be generated by this proposal. Presently Willow south of County 6 carries approximately 1,600 trips par day. It is estimated that 116 will increase trips along Wil low in Medina from 1,400 to 3,000. Presently there is no estimate of traffic increase on Willow in Orono. C. Speed limit - presently the limit is 40 miles per hour. Future speed limit on an upgraded Willow Drive is presently anticipated going to the road design speed of 45 MPH. The City, as noted in Attachment F, has asked the County to address a number of issues with the responses being found in Attachment J. Extension of County 116 - Public hearing July 7, 1987 Page 4 of 4 Should the Council be interested in the extension, the City staff would explore with the County the following items: A. Timing of traffic control on County 6 and Willow Drive. B. Installation of a traffic light at Willow and 12, at least temporary lights, with the cost to eventually be borne by the County and the State within one year. C. That the width issue particularly north of 6 be addressed by utilization of an urban section of road (without ditches) so that the improved portions of the road do no encroach as much into those lots. (This could shorten up the impact of the road from approximately 70 feet to approximately 40 feet.) D. When the County would anticipate take over. RECOMMENDATION - Following the presentation by Hennepin County, together with the public hearing and hearing any concerns any Council members may have staff recommends that the issue be tabled to the August loth meeting to research issues the Council may have on this matter. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by _, that following conclusion of the public hearing and discussion by the Council members on the issue that the matter be tabled until the August 10, 1987 meeting. Ayes _, Nays cc: City of Medina City of Long Lake Ted Hof fr.(dn July 8o 1987 To the 16yor City of Orono Attn: Cow.;Jl Meaberm also P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bap►, Mn. 55323 Gentlemenr is feel that the extension of county road #U6 will have a ne;,ative effect on our property and the entire area and wish to voice our disapproval of this project. Sincerely, •L H.�Rd'LLVGS r RnM V. ROI.i.2NQB 12987.8 TO: 'Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator,''/,, DATE: rebruary 4, 1987 SUBJECT: City of Medina - Orono Extension #116/willow Attachment: A. Preliminary Layout CSAH #116 B. Gerhardson Hemo Cty 116 Dated February 4, 1987 ISSUE - Identification of issues and concerns Orono has related to the pcssible entension of County 116 from its intersection at Highway 55 to Highway 121. INTRODUCTION - The City of Orono has been recently contacted by the City of 'tedina as it has been indicate.] they have again requested that the County look at extending County 116 down Willow to, at least County Road Six, if not Highway 12. It is their feeling at this time although the expenditure is not a programmed expenditure, that the County may be interested in doing this for the City, as a quid pro quo for their ongoing landfill. when this was last considered by the City of Medina in 1983 people of '11—lina south of County 24 along Willow objected to it, however thcs- north of County 24 were generally in favor of it. As noted or. the map this would provide the only direct north -south link for the community apart from County 19, which is on the western edge and segments of Willow that weave back and forth in '-he community. DISCUSSION - The City of Medina invited Orono to be attendance at theirr February 3, 1987 informational meeting on the matter. John Gerhardson was in attendance at that meeting and relayed the following issues and concerns that the City of Orono may have in relationship to this proposal. - Estimate of increased traffic in Orono - Impact of status of. Willow as a Municipal State Aid street (MSA) - North of Six - Between Six and Highway 12 - Attendent traffic control improvements at: - County Road Six and Willow - Highway 12 and Wi1iow - Impact on 1)ropuscd fiuntage road system north of Highway 12 - Impact of traff is en Highway 12 - Extension of physical portion of Willow as to: A. Traveled portion (traveled portion is presently 24 ft. with 3 ft. shoulder width south of County 6 and 20 f t. north c f County 6) expanded to 8 f t. shoulders similar to ;ail low south of Watertwon - Ditches would also be inclu.'2d if a rural section. B. Right of Way increase from 66 to 80 ft.) As an Alternate to using Willow as County 116 the County may explore use of Old Crystal Bay Road from County Six south. This could provide for a County Roar' 11 the way down to County 51. Issues include: - Impact on traffic and width - Signalization improvement at Old Crystal Bay Road - Impact on frontage roads -his alternative however, is presently not an option considered '-,y the County. It is anticipated that this %•,ould probably take 2 tc 3 years before it is funded together with another 2 to 3 years of construction to complete the roan. While it is anticipated that such a route would serve a:; a cut - across t)etween Highway 12 and ilighway 55 it is not anticipated that the amount of additional traffic would probably not be su')stantial. The significant issues for Orono are as follews: 1. Impact of increased traffic on: a. Resluents abutting Willow b. Major intersections along the route - County Six - Highway 12 - North frontage roads 2. Conversion of portions of Orono streets to County roads. 3. Funding Source for necessary traffic control improvements should the extension be made. As this change would be partially in Orono, Medina will be formally requesting Orono'j approval should they vote to go ahead with it. RECOMMENDATION - Given the fact that this would be a significant north sour route through the community to assist both police and fire access in the Medina community anti to some degree not in substance different to the north/south routes Orono has in Old Crystal Bay Road, Willow and North and South Brown that Orono not object necessarily to thn extension. Orono needs to look for ways to have the impact such an extension mitigated. Absent a good estimate of what increase in traffic that this would create apart from improved intersectional control at various points it is difficult to suggest other improvements to mitigate such. It is recommended any other issues or concerns to staff and that this be brought back at your Febraury 23, 1987 Council meeting for further discussion. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that this item be tabled until February 23, 1987. Ayes _, Nays _. cc: City of Medina City of Long Lake 19 PROPOSED CSAH 116 EXTENSION A R )of PROPOSED ALIGNMENT goo l To: Mark V. Bernhardson, City Administrator From: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator Date: February 4, 1987 Subject: Proposed County Road 116 On February 3, 1987, I attended a public information meeting at thu 1•;e3ina City Hall. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the pr^nosed extension of County Road 116 from State Hiqhway 55 south t(• S' 'Iighway 12. The upgrading of the road is being [promoted t city of Medina because presently there is not an adequate north-. )uL: road through Medina and city roads are being used which in turn is causing extensive maintenance costs. If County Road 116 is constructed it will be paid for and maintained by Hennepin County. As you can tell by the attached information, the extension of County Road 116 has been part of M dina's and Hennepin County's Transportation Plan for several years. however, it is Hennepin County's position that the road %•:ill not receive consideration unless it is extended further south to State Highway 12. Previously all nosals indicated construction of the road to end of County Road 24 During the presentation by the Medina Engineer and Hennepin County it was determined that the design of the road would be an 80 foot right-of-way, 24 feet of driving surface with 8 feet bituminous shoulders, the design speed limit would be 45 MPH but the Minnesota DepartmEnt of Transpc.•tation would have the final say about vrhat a safe and reasonable speed limit would be. Currently the traffic counts on Willow Drive between County Road 24 and County Road 6 are approximately 1,400 VPD (vehicles per day) on the south end and 1,900 VPD at the Orono/Medina border. Hennepin County estimates that when the road is completed traffic counts may be 2,500-3,000 VPD. There are no plans for signalization at County Road 6 and Willow Drive but a traffic signal at Willow Drive and Highway 12 is a probability. Following discussion by the audience, the Medina Council voted to table the matter for six weeks to allow time for more information to be received from residents abutting the proposed or existing roadway. TO: 1ay,,>r and City council rROM: Mark 3ernhardson, City Administrat r DATE: February 12, 1987 SUBJECT: City of iledina - Orono Extention 0116/Willow Attachment: A. City of i•ledina - Orono Extention #116/Willow Memo Dated 2/4/87 R. Present Traffic Counts - Proposed Layout ISSUE - Discussion by Counc_ilmembers as to concerns they may have relate] to the extention together with laying out the process for Council's further consideration of the matter. INT?OCUCTION - Presented as a consent item last time was a memo related to 'tire extention o1 115. *.t the public hearing that Medina had on the natter un reb:uary 3, 1987 they chose to table the r.atter until tlarch 17, 1987. DISCUSSION - Attachment 3 outlines present and anticipated traffic counts to give Councilmembers an appreciation for the impact of this change on residents abutting Willow Road. While it is anticipated that traffic would increase along Willow it would not be a direct shortcut between 55 and 12. The shortcut however may be 116 to Tamarack south to County Six, particularly if the stretch o` Tamaracki north of County 24 was paved, this is a concern because of the current concern relater] to the intersection at Tamarack and Six. It is our present understanding that the County desires that 116 continue down Willow to Highway 12 rather than going over to Old Crystal Bay Road. An additional indication has been given to the City that the County would work for signalization of Willow at Highway 12. If Willow were currently a County road two of the four legs for payment of signalization would be the States, one the County's and the fourth Long Lake's, with Orono bearing a prrtion of the County and State shares. There is a concern that there may be a need for signalization at that intersection prior to County takeover and that this would have to be worked out with the County for payment/reimbursement of such an action. It additionally is anticipated that stop signs would have to be installed at County Six and Willow together with traffic control at the proposed frontage road. ,RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the City table further coo NT(Te—Tafion of 116 until the City of Medina has undertaken formal action regarding this matter. Once such action is taken it is recommended that a public hearing be esta5lished by the Urunu City Council with notification going to all abutLing property owners on Willow Drive. Given that no formal action has yet been taken regarding this natter and the City anticipated development of the corridor which may necessitate some improvements anyway that the Highway 12 Corridor C-)mp Plan Amendment not incorporate any anticipated change for possible extention of County 116 at this time. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to table this mat' until formal action is taken by the City of Medina. If such .on directs 116 to be established by the County, staff is then directed to establish a public hearing on this matter and notify all property owners abutting Willow. (Including all residents whose access is onto Willow within four weeks of receiving notification from the City of Medina.) Ayes __, Nays cc: City of Long Lake City of Hedina 2 To: ' F. B(( rni1c11k1sun, city Adildni:.t rr,tor Iron: John it. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator Date: February 4, 1987 Subject: Propo:.ed County Road 116 On February 3, 1987, I attended a public information meeting at the Medina City Hall. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the proposed extension of County Road 116 from State Highway 55 south to State Highway 12. The upgrading of the road is being promoted by the City of Medina because presently there is not an adequate north -south road through Medina and city roads are being used which in turn is causing extensive maintenance costs. If County Road 116 is constructed it will be paid for and maintained by Hennepin County. As you can tell by the attached information, the extension of County Ror-d 116 has been part of Medina's and Hennepin County's Try .sportation Plan for several years. However, it is Hennepin County's position that the road will not receive considerction unless it is extended further south to State Highway 12. Previously all proposals in,icated construction of the road to end of County Road 24. During the presentation by the Medina Engineer and Hennepin County it was determined that the design of the road would be an 80 foot right-of-4ray, 24 feet of driving surface with 8 feet bitum' )us shoulders, the design speed limit would be 45 MPIi but the Minn =a Department of Transportation would have the final say about c a safe and reasonable speed limit would be. Currently the traffic counts on Willow Drive between County Road 24 and County Road 6 are approximately 1,400 VPD (vehicles per day) on the south end and 1,900 VPD at the Orono/Medina border. Hennepin County estimates that when the road is completed traffic counts may be 2,500-3,000 VPD. There are no plans for signalization at County Road 6 and Willow Drive but a traffic signal at Willow Drive and Hirhti•r,,y 12 is a probability. Following discussion by the audience, the Medina Council voted to table the matter for six weeks to allow time for more information to be received from residents abutting the proposed or existing roadway. 01 Tr y 6 O 4 cc, v E Holy Name i I Lake 4eu„r" I ? 4TO o71 w i lo Wolsteld • Lake i o � F- o i • ",.� i Mooney Lake lassen a 77. 000 akeLydiarda oC?�Lake 12 ~� `LongHadley LongaLake �Y 146 °' 15 q �oSt r( r St S�� L PROPOSED CSAH 116 EXTENSION 10 TA7---A4As PROPOSED ALIGNMENT 101 institutional Open Space R.O W. B 0 AC, 27 2 AC. 11 ? AC 19* "ACM-S City of Orono 1I:GHWAY 12 CORRIDOR S'UDY 3287. 5 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator�h^,-) DATE: March 2, 1987 SUBJECT: County 116 Attachment: A. Attorney's Opinion Dated 3/1j187 ISSUE - Transmission of information to Council regarding its rights vis-a-vis the County relating to jurisdiction over a current M.S.A. street. INTRODUCTION - At Council's last meeting the issue of 116 being exten ed from Highway 55 down to Highway 12 along Willow was discussed. At that meeting the issue regarding the City's ability to prevent Hennepin County from taking over the Orono section of Willa-. should they desire to build it, was discussed. It was requesteu t the City Attorney research the issue. DISCUSSION - Based on a review by the Attorney it is our present understanding that while the County may have some authority in taking over the road from the City as it currently exists, a M.S.A. street, the legality of the situation would require a court hearing on the matter. Additionally since the road request is one initiated by the City of Medina and not Hennepin County it is not anticipated that the County would not force the issue and may drop the entire project if Orono is in opposition. RECOMMENDATION - That the Council accept the information from the C y—Attorney and that upon Medina taking formal action on the matter a public hearing be scheduled for the City of Orono. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by, seconded by , to accept the Attorneys information on the �atter arip',table a matter until a future public hearing. Ayes P, Nays \�j M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and City Council Members FROM: City Attorney RE: Extension of willow Road DATE: March 11, 1987 Issue: At the last Council meeting the City Council requested that I provide you with some information regarding the process by which county state -aid highways (CSAH) are designated and the City's ability to affect that process. Analysis: Minnesota Statutes §162.02 Subd. 7 states that the County Board of any county may establish and locate a CSAH upon or over any established road or street or a specified portion thereof within the County's limits. The statute does provide, however, that no CSAH can be established or located within the corporate limits of any city without the approval of the governing board of the city. Minnesota Statutes §162.02 Subd. 8 amplifies the approval requirement by repeating the necessity of council approval set forth in Subd. 7. Subdivision P reads as follows: Approval by City. No portion of the county state -aid highway system lying within the corporate limits of any city shall be constructed, reconstructed, or improved nor the grade thereof changed without the prior approval of the plans by the governing body of such city and the approval shall be in the manner and form required by the commissioner." Minnesota Rule 8820.0800, Subpart 1 prescribes the procedure for route designations. Subsequent to County Board and City approval, the highway or street selection must be reviewed by the district state -aid engineer of that area who in turn will forward a recommendation to the Commissioner of Transportation. Upon preliminary approval by the Commissioner, the county board can establish the routes by designation. Only after resolutions of approval are received from the county and city, can the commissioner give final approval to the designated route. Conclusion: The city can approve or reject the designation of Willow Road as a CSAH. Therefore, the power to deny imbues the city with the power to negotiate with the County should thy: Willow Road designation be unacceptable. K4B/11/3048A cc: Nancy Husnick C`ty of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Namel, Minnesota 55340 FEB 2 3 ITT February 12, 1987 Dear Medina Residents: ,he Mc 'Ina City Council held an informational meeting on 'Tuesday, February 3rd to discuss the possibility of approving an extension of Co. Rd. 116 through the City of Medina. The proposed alignment is designed to connect Nwy. 55 to Hwy. 12, as shown on the trap on the reverse side. At the meeting the City Engineer presented the following, information: 3+ miles of City street would be transferred to the county highumv system; Cost of constructing 1•' miles of new road would be approximately $415,u00 Y;ir.h the c.,tire c)st of construction being borne by Hennepin County; a north/south rc--id ha] been included in the cities Comprehensive Plan. Benefits of the project urould be: faster response time by emergency vehicles; a safer road than city streets hk cause hills would be cut doti.m and curves straightened; less use of city streets by north/south traffic. Ted Hoffman of Hennepin County Transportation explained that construction would consist of a 9 ton road similar to Co. Rds. 24 and 19 with two-12 ft. lanes and paved 8 ft. shoulders on each side. After designation as a County State -Aid rood, the estimated cost of 2' million dollars for the entire project could be taken from State Aid -funds. The County would then put the project into its 5 year plan and detailed design work could commence. The road would be constructed to a 45 mph design with stop signs placed on Co. Rd. 116 at Co. Rd. 24 and Co. Rd. 6 with signals at Hwy. 12. Various city residents spoke in favor of, and against, the construction. Some of the favorable comments were: The inabi'_ity to travel on %Mt,dina Rd. during the spring, mud season; the ability to move emergency vehicles through the City in a faster, safer manner; a north/south road through the City is inevitable when consideration is given to there only being Co. Rd. 19 and Hwy. 101 which are north/south routes but are 7 miles apart; the ability to have a through road at no expense to residents; the need to upgrade Willow Dr. in a few years at a cost of $100,000 to $200,000, assessed to city residents. Opponents expressed the following concerns: A corridor between Hwy. 55 and Hwy. 1_2 for the benefit of others; a major road through the middle of the city would alter the rural atmosphere and hasten development of the amity; an increase in truck traffic; convenience for commuters, rather than residents; traffic speed will increase; the city is being asked to approve a 24 foot wide road, which is wider than the new city road width policy for r>>ral residential roads. The City Council agreed that the magnitude of the proposed road warranted notification of all residents and business owners in Medina and request that written comments be fon,rarded to City Hall prior to O w-ir next discussion of the matter on Tuesday, March 17th at 8:00 p M. Your: truly, CITY OF MYDINN Donna Roehl, Clerk -Treasurer �' � "} • � , fir :� 1 � � � A •rpp < �5��^ 1 ':vi f -� •� •IltC • 1 ti�� •• , � x �.�r! �• 4 .:� .. � i� . _ 'jai 41 F�� ��• I �� � _� 7 a. •. �} ,� ... .'x•.. � -:j� � ! �=:I��t j .� t1 ,Y.�}':,t�l;.tj�~.� •amsey e t `' •M".__.i H�yra w Hassan Dayton r' w ?° 10" " Corcoran Gr enfiel } 10 I eo , via le G ove` 6 L. 10 } of �• I t „ . , i ` b :tit li !t Medina »_ Plymout i lancet t r - • /� , •ter, j - ,. / � I` 1 1 • I s City of Me 1 2052 County Road 2 Hamel, Minnesota 55. May 20, 1987 Mark b�.rnhardson City of Orono P 0 Box 66 Crystal Bay, i•Z, 55323 Dear Mark: rr� MAY 2 2 087 i 'V Enclosed is a copy of a letter sent t.c Hennepin County regarding Medina's approval of the Co. Ra. 116 extension through the city. I presiune the County will ue contacting Orono for approval of extension to H1,Y. 12, so if there is any help that we at 'Iedina ran give you, please call. Would you keep us informed as to the procedures the City of Orono is following with regards to this project. Yours truly, CITY OF MEDINA Donna Roehl, Clerk -Treasurer - )"k, & , ,�- /\ City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 H=cl, Minnesota 55340 May 20, 1987 I{eluleriii County _ : irtment of Transportation 320 W..shington Ave. Hopkins, MP: 55343 To Whom It May Concern: At their May 19th City ^ouncil mr.,ting the Medina City Council approved the extension of Co. Pd. llf -c.u3h the City of Medina according to Project 7735, prepared ' r department; that is: south from Pinto Dr. 'no. Pd. 116) a. 55, connecting to Medina Rd and continuing to the Orono/',Medina boundary on Willow Dr. We request that you proceed with design plans for construction of the road so that the actual construction can begin as soon as possible. If anyone in the city can be of any assistance please do nest hesitate to call. Our office number is 473-4643. Yours truly, CITY OF MEDINA Do;ina Rochl, Clerk -Treasurer C: Commissioner Rotb Vern Genzlinqer City of Orono City of I�ng Laker CITY of ORONO Pohl Office Ho: 66•Crystal Hay, Minnesota W23•Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka June 23, 1987 Hennepin County Department of Transportation 320 South Washington Avenue Hopkins, MN 55343 Attn: Ted Hoffman, Chief Design Engineer Dear Ted: On July 13, 1987 at 7:00 p.m., the City of Orono will conduct a public hearing in-.egards to proposed County Road 116. We are requesting you to give a brief presentation on the following: 1. Where the new road would start at the north and where the ruar! would terminate at the south. Initially the road was to terminate at County Road 24. 2. Why there should be a County Road 116. 3. Roadway design - rural or L ban. 4. Type of traffic projected to use ant. proposed average daily traffic counts. 5. Intersection control at County Road 6 and Highway 12. 6. Cost to the City of O:-"a, I am sure there will bit oth:eir questi ar a asked of you at the public hearing. If you have any questions or c,-if,-Aer.tb, please feel free to call me at 473-7357. Sincerely, d John R. Gerhardson, Public works Coordinator JRG/tIn WiLDOG a 10mr4G - 471.73.47 0 ADMNYTRA11f N A HNAWK - 471.7136 • PUBLIC wORtts - 1717 )1! 42188.1 P.P!? TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: April 21, 1988 SUBJECT: County Road 15 Street Lightinr, - Design Engineer Report Attachment: A. Engineer's Report - County Road 15 Street Lighting - Ehlers and Associates B. County Road 15 Lighting and Financing Memo Dated 3/21/88 (No Attachments) C. Eng;neer's Proposal (not included) D. Lighting Layout Plan (not included) ISSUES - 1. Determine if the City desires to further pursue the issue of City owned 1 igh L i ng on County Road 15. 2. If so, b,.! ting of a public hearing date. 3. If a public hearing date is set, determine preliminary amount to be assessed. 4. Determination as to whether the Council desires to go out for bid or accept this as an addendum to the Hennepin County contract with the lighting company. INTRODUCTION - MF.A CULPA - At the Ma,.ch 28, 1988 meeting the Council approved the undertaking of a feasibi 1 ity study by Ehlers and Associates for the street lighting on County Road 15. At '- me the estimate was $92,000 for the 1 ights plus $4, 500 for :,�asibi 1 i ty study. For a total of $97,000. As noted in the report this has changed. DISCUSS_IO_N - The current amount proposed for the contract is $113,720. This is almost $20,000 more than had been originally anticipated in the preliminary estimate. Despite a 28 decrease by the bidder for amending the contract Ehlers had not estimated cabling on both sides in order to allow the lights to be on alternate sides of the road. This amounted to about 95% of the increase in expenditure. In addition, as noted the County now has indicated that as this is a County contract they have a right to an additional $11,300 if they choose to exercise their contract administration provision. At present we do not have a response hack from them as to whether they would actually enforce this or if they had charged this amount against the City of Mound in their street lighting. We hope to have an answer for you on Monday night. 1 Should the City choose to go out and bid this project out rather than go with a contract addendum, it may have an impact as to whether it will later be able utilize the proposed contract price as an addendum. If the City chooses to bid it should have it bid by the date for the public hearing, although enough time exists to have that done. The City of Sprinq Park's estimate on the feasibility was $25,000 over what they had previously been given. Apparently for similar reason. (It should additionally be noted that NSP has been contacted and would be willing to bury most of the electrical lines along County 15 for the "reasonable" price of ($200,000)). ALTERNATIVES - Issue 1. Determination to go ahead A. Agree to go ahead at the higher price B. Choose to do nothing further C. Table Issue 2. Set a public hearing date it going ahead A. Set a date for May 23, 1988 B. Table Issue 3. Preliminary financing A. Choose to assess $113,000 plus a portion of the 10% (This would raise the estimates in Attachment B by about 20%) B. Assess the $97,000 and have the City pay for the overage either through MSA or general tax funds C. City pay for the entire amount of street lighting D. Not go ahead Issue 4. Determination as to bid A. Make this as an addendum to the present contract B. Bid to see if we can get a better price than the current contract in existance C. Table RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that despite the increase in cost the City go ahead s� tting a public hearing date for May 23, 1988 to assess $97,000 of the total cost with the balance to come out of MSA/General funds. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the City set May 23, 1988 as the public hearing date for assessing $97,000 in street lighting costs with the balance to come out of MSA,'General funds. Ayes , Nays cc: Ehlers and Associates 2 ROBERT A. ELLER ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS (ELECTRICAL) EDINA 01TICE • 5513 VAI.I FY LAW • EDINA. MN 55435 • (612) 941.2986 MINNETONICA OFFICE • 14407 FXCEI.SIOR BIND. • WMA. MN 55345 • (612) 931.01" April 19, 1988 Mr. John Gerhardson Mayor & City Council City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Gerhardson: Attached is a copy of the bid price for the street lighting on County Road #15, submitted by Killmer Electric Co. , Inc. who has the contract for street lighting and traffic signal owrk on the County Road #15 projects. In general, the bid prices are a little over 25, less the bid prices in the City of Mound on the original contract. This is because of the increase in quanities of lighting units and the large amount of underground wire. Hennepin County has added on the cost, $800. 00, of an additional light and mast arm at the traffic signal installation of C. S. A. H. #15 and #19. Also note that the City is subject to a 10% contract administration charge by Hennepin County. It is recommended that the City accept this bid by Killmer Electric Co. I do not think that t�,(- City would receive better bid prices by going to the competitive L u... ig process. If you have any questions on this, please contact Mr. Robert Eller or myself. Robert A. Eller Associates "James E. Regan I CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA COUNTY ROAD 015 STREET LIGHTING UNIT PRICE SCHEDULE Lighting Units Type 813-35 Service Panels Type PM 1 1/2" RSC Conduit 1 1/2" Non Metallic Conduit 2" RSC Conduit Undrgrd, Wire I Cond. No. 6 Undrgrd, Wire I Cond. No. 12 Light Bases Design M Additional Lighting Unit On ea ea. LF LF LF LF LF ea al 4 660 1180 262 56442 3960 36 Signal MA 2 at CSAH 19 ea. 1 * Total Price If pad mounted services are required, add to service panel price $300.00 each. If bases are installed without lighting units, add $45.00 each to Des4V M bases. V. co NA Yet. ee aG it.00 /0 q=-*s Yo ,Z 90 yam o• �� 37?� I 800.00 800.00 $113,540.94 * Subject to a 10% contract administration charge by Hennepin County as per City of Mound agreement. 3228S.1 TO: Mayor and City Council PROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato�� ' DATE: March 21, 1988 SUBJECT: CoiInty Road 15 Lighting and Financing Attachments: County Road 15 Memo Dated 2/8/88 B. County Road 15 Memo Dated 10/22/87 C. City of Mound County Road 15 Memo D. Resolution for Feasibility /(r ISSUES Issue 1. - Street Lighting - A. Determination as to the type of lighting the City would .like on County Rcad 15 B. Means to finance the lighting C. Selection of design engineer to undertake the project if the City desires to do project Issue 2. - County Road 15 - Financing - Determination as to method of financing the project. INT:.ODUCTION - At the Council's February 22, 1988 meeting the issues regarding lighting and financing were discussed. The issues were tabled at that time as Councilmembers wanted more time to consider the issues related to lights, together with more time to think through the ramifications of the financing. In a review of the financing on the project as to appropriate dates regarding required actions, the staff has come to the determination that the City will not be able to use special assessments for the portions being done by the County as the contract has been awarded before the City held its first formal special assessment hearing. This limits the City's options on that portion to General Fund and Municipal State Aid monies (which was originally contemplated as noted in Appendix B) together with an impact on bonding and special levies. The City could still use special assessments for the lighting if it chose to do such. DISCUSSION - ISSUE NO . 1 - STREET LIGHTING - A. Joint City Project - There is a savings of app-oximately $1,000 per City should the City of Spring Park and Orono jointly use the same design engineer for their project. The City of Sprir.q Palk is interested in such an arrangement and at their March 21st meeting they deciders fn go ahead with such a project. County Road 15 Lighting and Financing March 21, 1988 Page 2 of 4 B. Design Engineer - As noted before the City has contacted Mr. Robert Eller, Consulting Engineer, to do the electrical design. His initial indication for the City of Orono that it would cost $5,500 to do the design. A joint effort of the two Cities of Spring Park and Orono would save approximately $1,000 for each one. The cost to have the engineering work done by Bonestroo is in the range of $6-7,000 as opposed to the $4,500-5,500 figure we are looking at from Mr. Eller. Mr. Eller is also the one that did the design 13yout for the Mound system. C. Financing - The cost of the lights can either 1)e done by a special assessment or could be done through general or ASA financing. The City of Mound assessed 50% of their cost of street lights, which totaled approximately $127,400 for their project of which approximately $64,000 was assessed at a cost per foot of $14.58 for commercial property and $9.72 for residential property. (This is for a 100 foot spacing between lights.) The adopted proi)osal would run the lights from Commerce Boulevard to Fairview. Thel did not choose to run it from Fairview to Bartlett although they are now contemplating additional lights by Seaton Bridge. Comparable costs for Orono is $97,000 which would result in a commercial assessment of about $3.50 for residential and $7.00 for commercial at the 50% assessment level. (The 100% assessment for this project would alternatively be $7.00 and $ 14.00 for the project.) The higher cost in Mc and is due to the closer 100 foot spacing versus the 140 foot prorosed here together with the fact that approximately 30% of the front footage to be assessed was owned by the City and therefore not assessed. The City of Mound used MSA funds for their share for the ba: ance of the 50%. D. An example of the current lighting exists both on Commerce Boulevard in Mound together with Carlson Parkway north of Highway 12. Utilization of this lighting system would remove 7 of existing wooden poles along County Road 15. The poles remaining w�,uld the north side of County 15 between Navarre Avenue and the City l-mits. Issue No. 2 Financing - To the extent the City is not going to specially assess for its expenses on County Road 15 to at least the 20% level financing wil: have to come from internal or MSA sources. Should the Council choose to assess the $97,000 amcunt, the range of options are as follows (other combinations within the range are also possible): County Road 15 Lighting and Financing March 21, 1988 Page 3 of 4 (Annual Cost/General) Special General Fund (10 r 6.58) Assessment #1 384,000 53,500 97,000 #2 284,000 40,435 97,000 #3 184,000 25,600 97,000 #4 100,000 13,900 97,000 #5 0 0 97,000 ALTERNATIVES Issue 1 Street Lighting a. City owned street liahtina Adopt Amend and adopt Table Reject b. Consulting_ design engineer Appoint Table c. Financing Adopt recommendation Amend and adopt Table Reject Municipal (Est. State Aid Net Loss of MSA) 0 0 100,000 (14,200) 200,000 (21,750) 284,000 (30,800) 384,000 (42,000) , Issue 2. Method of Financing - County Road 15 Sources Adopt recommendation, order feasibility, and set hearing schedule Allocations Amend and adopt Table Means of Financing Finance through MSA Internal sources RECOMMENDATION - Issue 1 - Street Lighting a. Type of Lighting - It is recommended that the City go with the City owned lighting to replace the existing wooden poles. b. Consultant - Consulting Design Engineer - It is recommended that the City go with Robert El.lers in conjunction, with the City of Spring Park to do the design of the project. C. Method of Financinq - It is recommended that the city assess the tote? o��fT-6n . County Road 15 Lighting and Financing March 21, 1988 Page 4 of 4 Issue 2 - Method of Financing A. Sources of Revenue The following is recommended as a source of revenue for the project: Project Costs -- $481,000 Financing - General Fund 184,000 Municipal State Aid 200,000 Special Assessment 97,000 $481,000 PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that the Council direct staff tc, make the necessary preparation for City owned lighting project on County 15 and finance the project by $_ from General Fund - internal sources and $ from its MSA monies directing the feasibility study and setting a hearing date. Ayes _, Nays _ 229bs),I /I City of ORONO�,. (ING RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2411 pyr; 2 51°c 3 RESOLUTION OF RECOGNITION .OA'TY OF ORONO CHIEF MELVIN KILBO WHEREAS, Melvin Kilbo is Chief of the Orono Police Department; and WHEREAS, Chief Kilbo concerned with the drug problem in Orono, Spring Park, Long Lake and Minnetonka Beach felt the most appropriate role for the local police department to deal with drugs was development of a program focused on users and street level dealers; and WHEREAS, Chief Kilbo worked to develop in conjunction with the four City Attorneys a revised ordinance which declared trace amounts to be a misdemeanor making it easier to prosecute; and WHEREAS, Chief Kilbo appropriately trained and motivated Patrol Officers in the enforcement of these ordinances; and WHEREAS, information developed by Patrol Officers on the street was beneficial in the execution of search warrants and arrests; and WHEREAS, Chief Kilbo actively promoted his department'_ efforts with the School Districts to improve the information exchange between the Police Department and Schools as it relates to alcohol and drug usage; and WHEREAS, this recognition has been done at the request of the Officers of his department, many of whom he has recognized for their efforts in this program. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono together with the members of Chief Kilbo's department would like to have this resolution for outstanding service presented to Chief Kilbo for recognition of his excellent work, not only in development and execution of this program but also for his many years as Police Chief. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held 1:)ril 25, 1988. Jame R. Grabe , Mayor---+------�- 1 n? ity erk City Of ORON0 1- (ING RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 2 r J1;''3 NO. PROCLAMATION MINNESOTA CITIES WEEK MAY 1 - 7, 1988 WHEREAS, Cities are a grass roots governmental system which represents a close relationship between elected officials and citizens; and WHEREAS, some 89 percent of the people in Minnesota choose to raise their families and make their homes within our state's cities; and WHEREAS, Cities provide the basic services necessary to insure the health, safety, and well being of the people --services such as water, streets, and police anc fire protection; and WHEREAS, Cities exhibit amazir,.j versatility in funding unique ways to cost effectively provide these services to their residents; and WHEREAS, Cities are essential to the future protection and development of our resources; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to recognize the work of city officials, city employees, and volunteers in providing for the economic growth and vitality of our communities; WHEREAS, Rudy Perpich, Governor of the State of Minnesotl., has proclaimed the first week in May to be Minnesota Cities Week in Minnesota and has urged citizens to take this opportunity to learn more about city government and how they can become more involved. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono declare May 1 - 7, 198E "Cities Week" in Orono in recognition of its municipal organization and the people who compose the City of Orono. Adopted by the Orono Council of the City of Orono at a regularly scheduled Council meeting this 25th day of April, 1988. James R. Grabek, Mayor ATTEST: SorotFiy M. HaII3n" UEy Clerk----- 42088.2 C%Imck TO: Mayor and City Council I.yf V f FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato r A% DATE: April 20, 1988 SUBJECT: Compensation Plan Adjustment - Carol Hansing Attachments: A. Attachment B Orono Compensation Plan Memo Dated 3/22/88 B. Kilbo Memo Dated 4/15/88 ISSUE_ 1. Confirmation of salary increase for Carol Hansing based on the compensation plan and performance. INTRODUCTION - Carol Hansing is eligi'�)le on 4/12/88 to increase from $8.193 per hour to S8.Gyd according to the compensation plan. As noted in attachtr,Pnt B she has performP,i above the level of expected performance. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the Orono City Council approve the increase for Carol Hansing (part time Police clerical) from $8.193 to $8.648 based on performance. Ayes _, Nays _. 2118b.6 CITY OF OFnNO 1988 COMPENSATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN EXPECTED :F 51 ADJUST%ENT R.LCGMMENDED PERFORMANCE 1988 ESTIMATED DIFFENENCE CHANGE ANNUAL/AFTER TITLE (Budgeted -Nrs) CURRENT 1988 MAXIMUM MARKET VALUE !II?:t'D MAXIMUM t CURRENT EVALUA1lO"1 Finance Director 26.95 22.87 17.788 20.583 97.4 20.583 (16-14) Police Chief 29.946 22.87 20.96 2%.0! 9S.8 29.957 a 1.95 - 22.2;0 (61/92) City Clerk 12.875 1.3.39 13.78 -- 96.1 13.39 (69:14) Build!Zoning Admin 17.72 19.47 16.594 18.176 97.5 18.176 (69,1S) Asst Zoning Admin 14.579 15.55 14.70 15.17 97.5 15.17 (87/01) Senior Bldg Inspector 14.579 1S.55 14.70 15.17 96.1 15.17 (07/01) Building Inspector 11.95 13.39 13.266 -- 89.:: 12.951/12.72 1"/01) Retro 9.99 to 8115/6? hsst. Finance Director 9.656 11.43 N/A -- 84.4 10 ?87;110.858 (06,31) Deputy Clerk/Secretary 10.28 10.71 9.657 10.33 10. Police Secretary 10.28 10.71 9.857 10.33 10 i3', 0.) sr. Accounting Clerk 10.28 10.71 9.857 10.33 !; _ (8-Y!v) Recorder - PT(1606) 7.89 9.639 N/A _.f75 (01/09) rolice Clerical-PT(1300) 7.859 9.103 V/A -- 85.3 8.191;9.648 (04/12; Clerical - PT(1500) 6.592 8.532 N/A -- 77 7.25/7.679 (17,11) Number of personnel adjusted 14 Total personnel strongtb 49 DATE: April 15, 1988 TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator FROM: Mel Kilbo, Chief of Police SUBJECT: 1988 Comparable Worth Compensation - Carol Hansinc7 According to the 1988 Orono Comparable Worth plan and the compar- able worth study, Mrs. Carol Hansing is due for an increase from S-'to $8.648, effective April 12, 1988, and this memo is a request for this increase. Mrs. tiansinq_'s evaluation is attached to this memo and it shows that she is an excellent employee who has received commendations for her attention to duty as well as positive comments from both officers and the general public. She is a very valuable emplo,,f,P ana could be working full time if she chose to do so. I request this increase be granted. i 42088.1 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrate DATE: April 29, 1988 SUBJNCT: Resignation - Jerome Smith Attachment: A. Resignation. Pubmission ISSUE - 1. Information related to resignation of Jerome Smith. 2. Granting permissf:.i to seek replaccment. INSTRODUCTION - Attached please find the resignation form enbmitteY by_Jerome Smith, Utility Mechanic. PROPOSRD MOITON - Moved by _ , seconded by _ , tha' Onto Council acknowled�e the resignation of Jerome Smit. act staff to ur 'erta!, the procr .s tr, -ploy a persi. chat pos i t i or suu ject to suhseq,!-ant C, �unc i i approval. Ayes __, Nays VILLAGE OF ORONOP 'IHNESOTA STATE MIT OF RESIGNATION Preparr 3 conies NAME OF L'; (PLOYEE Department •itement of Resignation: Salary Rate -07 POSITION TITLE Full Time` X Part Time I request that this resignation be accepted by the Village Council to become effective on k/- - � -� , w/i lci: is the last day of actual service. I am requesting co■pensa on for 3ersonal service to the Vil a in the above indicated position for accrueu annual leave due for 2� 8--.M T;se reason for this resignation is as follow:.: Date: -00,0 (Employee's Signature) Recommendatic -f Department Ituad: I v ? ld not ( ) re -hire this employee. TA . ton may not be refilled witil�2� d' • Date. L/f LeP par m ea Certification of Accrued Leave: Payment for �� OR ` accrued leave upon empluyee's termination on l is . Ith ize Date: 2 �rtlt� t liagelaministrEWtj j- ' ----- I 41588.8 j�r,� 2 r TO: Mayor and City Council �y�'� FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: April 15, 1988 SUBJECT: Board of Review - April 27, 1988 Attachment: A. Relevant Sales Information - Board of Review 1988 B. City of Orono Map - 11:ssessing Quadrants Review by Year ISSUE - l. Providing general background information regarding valuations of 1988 for taxes payable 1989. 2. Transmission of comparable sales information in advance of the Board of Review. INTRODUCTION - As you are aware the City's contract Assessors Rolf Eifckson and Dave Wilde annually make adjii--m-�r,ts to the properties to :eflect their best estimate c" the market. Together with physically reviewing 1/4 of the properties in the community. This year they physically reviewed sections 7, 17, 18 and 21. DISCUSSION - The City of Orono is probably one of the most difficult communities to assess, not only in Hennepin County but also in the State of Minnes >ta, given the wide variety of housing, economic and property situations. The Assessors have reviewedall parcels in the City with all lakeshore being raised in response to substantial sales above the market value in that area together with attempting to achieve a market sales ratio between the estimated market and the actual sales that are occuring on similar type properties. This has resulted in a variety of different percentage i„creases on different pieces of property with substantial adjustments particularly to the property value of lakeshore land portion. As indicated these are in response to the market in hopes of avoiding adjustments by the County and State Board of Reviews that would be upward. In addition to the sales ratio perfc ^ nce the other measure of the quality of the assessment is the coefficient of dispersio'l, which measures the degree of variation among properties be, -weer their values and comparable sales. This disparity has been reduced from over 17, when the County was doing this, to down under lA which is within the acceptable bounds outlined in the ..tate Statute. Council has the authority to ra i s ind lower values as they see fit but no more than 1% of the total City assessed value. Th. Counci 1 can defer a decision on a property to the County of Review. Bath the County and State can raise the aggrega, ues 1 in the City after the City's Board of Review. The Assessors will again be using the slide/tape show at 7:00 P.M. for all attendees as an introduction. RECOMMENDATION_ - It is recommended that the Counci 1 accept the information in preparation for the Board of Review on the 27th. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the Council accept the information presented for the Board of Review on April 27, 1988 at 7:00 P.M. Ayes Nays cc: Rolf Erickson Dave Wilde E CITY OF ORONO Sales Used for the 1988 Assessment Section I Off lake Sales in PTN/ Order Sect. ion 2 Lake Sales by Hay Name • E w Section I 0`f Lake Sales in PIN# Order Representative Sales All Sales Not Included d k0 1 0 to RE�4 I DENT I AL. SALES DATA 1 +U Woodhill Ave 380211 %23210007 Nt>uS t✓ G S Pr cc� v M GU C I 'I Y OF ORONO u 'E8 PROPERTY DESCRiPrION MARKET DATA LAND: Land Areag Sale Amount...: 300000 BI.1 I L. D I NO Year Ht.ti 1 t : 19`1H Story Height: 140 lir-tind f- 1 oor Area: 1 H4h Ciross tkiildiriq Area: 1846 2 c,+r Liar acle # of besdrooms abr v- raradu?: 2 # full battis ahc,vf*- gr000e 0 # :'./4 bAthu. aiii eve gr�ldez # 1 / < bi.+i elm, aLrVVF` cir ,kdf? 1 Hasoment F i (►i e:h i nq: `..jl.)% W A l k Ou t ti,i seamen t-. r a t. t rr.l : ('e>l,i 1 IA 111 r : 1 Sall.? U'.4tE•.... H6IU.) LA+et: i) /v Frunt Fc3otage ... Fffpcti ve $/FF: Huger: F-ox EA I RAB: Porch Sizes: 610,-C-41: Srreen Porch llpprl Vor u t l: Deck:: Na i 11 F 1 i.)(-)r F i r e-p 1 ace Flat i fig 4 Vi-i-f_Yllf fit F F' k�.l.i flc1: 2 0 0 RES I DEN 11 „1. DATA 1'a Orono Or char d Rd 38(.)21 172322o(102 CITY 17F ORUNO NkOPER7Y DE SCRIP 1 TON t_ AND s Land Ar c-o! s 19 1 /,/,4 BUILDING Year Built: 1910 Story Height: (around Floor Art -as 1 416 Gross Bm I d i. nq Area: 21j9tj 2 car q �+r "ne N of beclr-claw3 abovf- grade: 3. N fct1.1 1)afti5 .itoovt- cir.tc1H 1 M :3/4 baths qr adt:a t IF 1 /2 h-tt hs� :+tprove- nr Ndf- 1 Basement t i1►i�h1iltiu: _�.;: Wal k.ou : Ff.�Ser,r+car►(. r +.# i rt,1: '► (:t-rit r N1 it r MAkk.E: r DATA Sale Amount...s 1 `,6C)i ►0 Sale Date...: U61:' F ffer_t2 vN Frc.,rit Footage.. . . 1 ve i / F F : bu , ar s Far 1 ey E 9 TRW33 Porch Si Foss G1 az'•d: Sf..rven Porrh Ill.t•ri Vioro h: 1�'t_r Uec.k:s M.asn F-1l►or F=ireplact.? kotings 4 1.1; �srvn-n l F 1= k...t s rm: z rn lu RES I DEH 11 AL _,i,l.t_ of d A 521 HANLON AVE �8►7='.1 1 72? 3 ,10014 C I IY OF ORONO PROPER 1 Y DESCRIPTION LAND: Land Ar Ha: 2/()(I0 BUILD1NO Year Nu i 1 t : 195 Story Height: 12'.i Grottnd Floor Ar t:_-i.: 1 t)Uu br os s kiu i 1 d i ny Or-c?,A: 1, y►_► 1 car gariiclF 11 u+ be drucuns. above Uraadei 0 +ul l haths, above ►lr adf.� I 11 ._'./4 Ilai tl�; abtwrr ,:r•e•�ir i► ti 112 b,4t l#% a+bt►�•�• tir ht{� l► F�NSsi?nlerII- F 1111 ivll l Ilo ►�(1% WA k.fn►t Baswoue+nt. r-<4t ► ►q: ►:1 t:f•r►1 r �1 ial r s MARKET DATA Spa l p Amount ... : Sale Datt:'...: 8708 Ef+cacti et•+ Front Fclutage... E++ecti ve S /FF: buyer : MILLER/M1LNSO 80000 E Y I Ftf►�: b1 a: o,rl: � r.r-a,vn Forth llat►► Floor- F•lr opla►_e kati.nga b 1101t.,.:mr-►,t t I 1�,-,i I tills 3 ,eft� RESIDENTIAL SALES DA1 A 450 WOOUH I L_L R U C 1 T Y OF LIKINO 13 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 1. AND v L..acrlcl Areas `/�'c1c:x► 01JiL_DING Yea+c Hill 1 t.: I w 9Cory Hui -1ht: Gr or-tnd F I t)(w Ar F•,,r "e, Lyr-oss bui l cJ1.11c! Hrr•�.a: : / l.? f:..r gaAr wjf� t# c)f 41140vf? car adN: 4 4W I he,t h1 , Atvove cIr itilt- l# A lboyl- qi Ado it l 4tl(.Pvf. clr od*l I e�IM1.ad1E?flt.. 1.111-4.1Ostia 4►X a:.alnf:lIt r J 1 rit) : t) 1 c r,f r--I ill r r MARKEI DATA Salle Amount . . . : 305,000 Sale Uat e...: 8/0.3 t-#+C-Lt i Vr? Frurlt- Foutage. . . Effective $/FF: Nuyer : LUERY V- X 1 HAS: Pc)rch Si ze-i: (-;IaMzvd: Eirrven Porch '.:1pk•n Furc.h: Uf.!ck: Mai►► Fluor Fireplace Hating: 4 F �•�F�lnwnt 1-p Hatings 4 0 PROPER1 r DESCRIPTION ! AND s 1. and Ar eiA s 1(.)i>800 RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 980 FERNDAL.E RD 38021 17 t'. 3440019 N o v S C. "s s S L, e -'" CITY OF ORONU HBJ;C Cn .« oc� ►N H7 :saw MARKET DATA BUILDING Year Built: 19`,4 Story Height: 100 Ground Floor Ar -.a s 1864 6r-uss B,Ai ldiiit) Area: 1864 3 car c,)ArAgw M of bedrooms ahovc= c N full hattiti ;Abiwt• c:r 1 M 3/4 baths .:4cove yradt? I M 1/2 baths Above ,trade 0 Basement F ,u: W,a l k. OLI t. B a a t 1 n y s ► Lec,tr Al Airs 1 Sale Amount...: 350000 Sale Date...1 8704 Effective Front Footage... ! _ctive sF/FFs Huyters SIMSONSON/LAF..juN EXTRASs Porch Si ess 61, sods Screen Porch U{ wri Pur ch s slEc k : Main Floor Fireplace Rating: `.; brsstamwnt: FP Ratings s RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 2320 DEVIN LN 38031 172',220014 C I 1 Y OF ORONO ® PROPFRTY DESCRIPTION LAND: Land Art -at 94100 BUILDING Year Huilts 198o Story Heights 150 9ruund F7l oor Ar ea: 22'74 Grass bui ldinq Area: 2914 3 c•�+r �l�►rt�clE M of hedr oumF �bc►vf- grade: 4 11 full bat is above or acip 2 0 -W4 bath% grade O N 1 /2 bathes sbnvt- ►fir a►dt, 2 Basement. F i , nq : 'A-)% Wal kraut bammit►ont r at i nqt �:► Grnt ♦ al A► r : 1 Wil(KET DATA Sale Amount .s 278000 Sale Data—: 87u9 Effective Front Effective #i,-Fs buyers SONSTEGAkD EXikASs Pt:rct► aizvi.�I • <ed; Licreaan Porch 160 !_k,t-n Vcwcht Deck: Main F•luor Fir•epl -i►_c katings 4 t'r•� o-•mF�►it FP Hoti►ic, C1 RES I DENT I ESL_ SALES 6A f A 2320 DEVIN LN 38031 1723220014 CITY OF ORONO F'ROPFRTY DESCRIPTION LAND: Land Areas 941Au BUILDING Yoi,r blo i l t: I 1 SO story Wvigiit : 151) 6rouf,d F l c, lr Ar fa.as '1274 6,ro%cs Bui ldiny Area: 2914 ,3 r ar tier aqw # of bedroom%, above drat+ is 4 it full bath- ahcwe t1r iad- il -:;/4 bath% +bovo grade i► M 1/2 nv•th% above (1r,►1+ ftayssairrnt F i r i i 6.h i nil: 51`•. Way l kout. Ba..ement r att i nq: (Awntr ml Air: 1 MARKET DA,rA Sale Amvi_rr i t ... : Sale Dot • s 8708 1 275000 F f f (-r-, i vs! I ()n t _age.. . Effective g/FFf Liu sm I `it►IJ51EGAP 1) LA1kAces Porch Si bIara-d scree:, Porch 160 1 1pcen Fv •r f_to s Divc k s Main Floor F►.roplacer Hatif.,: 4 Ppo t•A:-nt Fp Rot. ifIaI 6 E lm� RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 217`'r WEBBER HILLS RD 39031 172 334OW3 CITY OF ORONO PROPF=RTY DESURIPT tf3N L AND Land fir taa: 4� nl�,�:u► OUILD1NO Wear lfutItt 19/2 Story Hetghts 14o Ormirid F 1 ocw Ar a■a s .1624 Oro�a But 1 d i nq Are -it 24 .' car rliaragf- M of by rdr oom,% abowa grwdoyt 4 M 4101 lsaths� .above (;r.++1e i N .3/4 baths aktaw- yrwder I M 1 /2 broth% Hhcrv., r►r ade� 1 boswwerwn t F i n i tah .i n q t 3A ►X 1lelkmit bavewoont ratings Uvntrat dirt 1 MARKET DATA �)a i F Amount...: 192200 sale 8611 F.ffecttve Front Footage... Ef4ective */FFt Huyer t L APEHN E k IRf4S2 F c >r c. h' 01 a,-(,.i �+r.recan Porch f Ft►wr r Pcw c h t I )arc. V.: 1 bH M.a►n Flr►ca- Fir*.lplsve Rat.tnq: g F.,4'-ORA-f,t F►- F rat inri; 7 0 0 RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 2000 WEBBER HILLS RD 39031172•3340017 CITY OF URUNO PROPERlY DFSCRIPlION LAND s l-and Arc -.At 42000 BUILDING Year Suiltc 1974 Story Heights Ground Floor Arvat 11 4 Uross building Areas 2164 2 t-ar clarmgee N of bedrooms above ►Iradoi 4 N full bat.ht; Ahis,(v c}raclt, 1 M 3/4 baith% above grade t M 1 /;2 baths ambf -vc• c►r o,ir- 1 8aimmer.nt Fintshint►s blest koc.tt. Ras@*meait Cr-ntr;tl Mrs MARKET DATA Sale Amount...a 175v� ►0 Sale Date...s 8709 Effwctive Front Footage... Effear_tiveA */FFs Buyer- s ERDAHL E%TkAlie Porch Sizeess 61<,radI SS reen Parch Upen Porch: becks 316 Main Floor FtrMpl—ire Ratings F 4%-rn►eae►t. FF, R,+t sntjs t .) RE' i 11jEN (I AL SALES DATA 29Hf�j WATERTOWN RU S 58041 171 .-210001 CITY OF t MOND PkC1PFRTY 1)EscRIprIUN LAND: Land Ar Fa s 87 7Rr i HUILDING Year Bui i t: 1953 Story Heights 10o Ground Floor Ar ei, : 17°;y Gross Building Arras 17',2 2 c ar cgar agc! N of bwdrrjr►m"s A)r)ve (jr-,Ads?. _ N full bathis agave rrr <-di• 1 N :;/4 h at:hq abcrvo clr -Adca rr M 1 / ' b.0 h•. rob( -ve r rr of I#, r r Ba%*-friefit. f-1nIst'1111lj: >.rr) Wart b ovt Hae,Pmc.rrt r--.4l r rrq: r,r C+�rrt r'41 AT r : MARKET DATA rimer I c Amount ... a 142500 Data... s 87o'5 Effective Front Footage... Effective t/FF: buyer: TROWBRIDGE E X T RA! s Porch Size -it wd: Screen Porch l►Irc rr Port -tit Decks M.;.rrr F1.-)c►r Fireplace Halting: 6 N.+`;k--nrtrnt FP keptinga 4 0 u 0 AS RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 3150 RIDGEWOOD CIRCLE 380411723230022 CITY OF ORONO PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LAND: Land Ark -a: 939oo BUILDING Year Builts 1981 Story Heights 130 Ground Floor Areas 3508 Gross building Areas 3508 2 car gar*ge N of bodrornns ab(:.)ve grade: 4 It f4:1S above (trade N 3/4 baths above grade 0 M 1/2 haiths above grade 1 Basement. F i n i sh i nq: ;i+►% Walkout basement ratings f► T.witral Airs 1 MARKET DATA Sal(- Amount ... s stale Date...: 8709 Effective Front Footage... Effective $/FFs Buyer: BRINDLEY F X TRAS: Porch Si: -es: vlareds btreen Porch 16O 1-4,o n Porchs 64 Decks 315 Main Floor Fireplace Ratings 1 Hasezment FP Ratings 2 10 i U RESIDENIIAL SALES DATA f'927 FARVIEW LANE 380411723340010 MY 1 Y OF ORON0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LAND: Land Area: 88000 BUIL..DINU Year Euilt: 197E Story Height: 100 Ground Floor Area: 2491 Gross Building Area: 2491 2 car garage M of bedrooms above grads: 2 M full baths above grade 2 N 3/4 bathes above cirade 0 N 112 baths iibove nr adr* 1 bavement Finishing: bca% Wa F ko,,+t. Basemran t rating: z' MARK: E T DATA Sale Amount...: 350000 Sale Date...: d/Ob Effective Front Footage... Fffec:tive $/FF: Huyer: SACHSE EXTRAS: Porch Sixes: 61azed: Screen Porch 398 Open Porch: Doc1: 336 Main Floor Firep1,+c_e Rating: 2 Cent r Al Aj r : 1 14cA%t ment. FF R-.t 1 tsq: 4 I * 11 W- RESIDENTIAL SAL_F_S DATA 185 EEDERWOUD DR 38051 1723120012 CITY OF ORONO PRUPERfY DESCRIPTION LAND: Land Area: BUILDING Year Built: 1939 Story Height: 100 Ground Floor Area: 1'./4 Gross Hiii lding ArFza: 1:774 c or garage # of bedrooms above (grade: 3 # full battis above grade 1 # 3/4 baths above grade �► # 1 /2. baths abcavt, grade U basement Fini%hinq: 00% Walkout. Basement ratings Q Central 0,jr: 1 MARKET DATA Sale AmOLIFIt ... : Sale Datu...: 8612 Effective Front Footage... Effective $/FF: Buyer: ANDERSON 85000 EXTRAS: Porch Sizes: (31azf-d1. Screen Porch LJpen Purchs DE-c�;: Main Floor Fireplace Ratings 5 Hasp►Rent hF' kAt i nti: !Z �y I 73 0 RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 3965 BAYSIDE RD 38051 1 7232: 0004 CI1Y OF ORONO PROPERTY DESCRiprION L AND: L.arid Area: 0 BUIl.DINti Year Built: 1966 Story Height: ioo Ground F 1 oor ArF a: 1200 Bross Building Areas 1200 2 car rjaarage N of bedrooms above grad*-: 3 N ft.111 r.)athe eAbc.ive gradr✓ 1 N 7•/4 baths above grade 0 M 1/2 bath!i Ahcivw grade: 1 NAsesment: Finishiiuls 50% Walkout Ba4omont ratings 4 MARKET DATA Sale AmaUnt...: 143725 liai.le Date—: 8/(-)21 Effective Front Footage... Effective S/FF: Nuyer. HLANCH E:XTRASe Porch Si .+.r- 61azNct: � cE;rreen Porch Open Porch Dec k: 192 Main Floor- place Rating: 6 0 C&ntr al Airs 1 Ra-flaftlent. FP Fiat i ncl: 6 RESIDE.NfIAL SALES DATA 350 NORTH SHORE DRIVE 380611723230011 CITY OF ORUND F'ROPER f Y DESCR I P T I GN LAND: [-arid Area: 5(')B7%o P ILDING Year P:+i 1 t: 1969 Story Heights 1t1r7 Gr nand Floor Ar teas 1 o56 Gross )4u i 1 d i nf_l Ar-wa: 10:i6 car garAqp >s of b•.?dr atirrve rjrad•a: 2 #1 4ui11 baths above r.,r ade 1 # '/4 -)„iths above# grade r► # f i 2 ',af fis Above ear ade± r> Ea<..,e►me it. F i n i tsh i ng a 70 Walk :,i�t: Haswment r<at.inq: Genlr AI iiir :,.' MARKET DATA Sale Amount ... : Sale Data...: 8611 Effective Front Footage... f-ffpetAve �/FF: Huyer-: E11.04KSlVF'DI 7 6000 EXMAC; I Porch Sizese 141 A.,ed-. Screen Porch 576 Ulpen Nor c f i s Dec k: Maim Floor F:ref)lacke Ratinn: t;:• . �. ow •;►t F N Fiat 3 11y: H 1 J 0 RES I DE:N I (AL SALES DATA 45V i NORTH ARM DR I VF :38061 172.5; 40006 CITY OF CIRONO PROPERTY DESCR I P f I ON LAND: Land Ar- ea t 240800 BUILDING Year Bii i 1 t s 19 'h Story Heights i`iu Ground F i c,or Areas 880 Urcisa HuildinU Areas 1166 '<' rar gaaraoe q of btadreiomw, abuvt! 44ri4deas 3 M full hathg.; ahtjvc• grade 1 p -%/4 bathqs above grade O it l / `..' brit h s aabovp cir erip Basement F i n i sih i nu s i X.1% Wal ar>ut r at i ne s MARKS f DATA Sal w AmOL-wit ... : Salp Date...: 8701.5 Effective Front Fcoot age. .. Fffeer_tivta l/FFs F+uver- s OLSON 98600 F X T HAS s Pnr ch Sxres: i ; I a. ed p 1 '16 :bc r tren Four r_ h 168 t4ierr Pur chs Dec k.: Mat.ri Fluor- Fireplace Rat.inq: P('font r a l Air: t FHramaaae-r-It FP Ratings El s RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 420 NORTH ARM DRIVE �t3n61 172�31 i)�)C�1 CITY OF 11RUNO PROPERTY DE:SCRIPI ION [_.AND: bUIL.UING Year bui1ti 1951 Story Height: lug► Ground Floor Ar pa: 1172 Grasp Nu i l d i nq Art -as 1172 2 cAr garage N of bedroomty above yra(1N: M fi.411 Maths above ;fir Ade I M 3/4 baths above rlr-Ado U N 1/2 hai h% imthuvr� rIr aide Pa%eawnt Finishinki3 H()%. Walkout Nanement rat i tiq: Central Air: MARKET DATA Salk, Amount... : Effective Front fc)otaGe... FffeLt:ive */FF: F+uysr t DUNSMUkE 89500 EXTRAS: Parch Sieves: GI azad: Srr c-esri Parch Upmn Vorch: DOCk: M,..+in FIaor Fireplace Ratings ►+�4prt+•i�t: It' kmt in.i: h 13 0 PROVERTY LAND: Land Ar ar R1.111 n l NCi Ysaatr Rui I Story He; Ground F J Gros% Bul 2 car U4 N of bedr N hall b4 N 3/4 b»i N 1/2 h0*1 Basement walkout. I t; awn t ► :+ l { E • RESIDENTIAL. (BAL `i DATA 1310 REST POINT LANE 38071 172 37,20030 C I'T ti OF ORONO PROPERTY DESCRIPTION L.ANDs t hrtd Area: ISi)(;►) BUILDING Year Bui l t s 194S Story Hex qht s 14.a►') Or ound F 1 ocir Ar eras 1 C►1 6 Bross Building Arveis 116 1 r ar year a;qe M of bedrae)ms above (jr-a;des H 11_111 beat.l►s Abovae grAdw 1 t# 1/4 baths above gr.adw C� #i 1 /2" hAth% above grade 4-� BwA%wment: Fsnishl;;,.ls 6o% Walkout. bisemont r ati;tgs t:orr;t r al Fla r s MARKET DATA Sale flmaur.t ... i ; A.i (- Uat.e.. , s 87(.YJ Fffwr.:t i ve F r unt Foot:Age.. . F ++c-c.13ve 4/FFs Huyers SGHMIDT 74400 FA1r:AB. t'urch >t.'kyt3t [,1 a►zeds Sc.rKen Porch 130 llpt-r; F'urrtis Becks 7H ''alit Floor Firseplacw Hating; 95 Fose-mc•r;t FF' Hating; 5 to k'E'-i 1 UE.N r 1 AL.. �jALE S DATA C" 0 North Sharp Or . ,130 71 17234:3t_)016 C 1 T Y OF MONO PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LAND a Land Ar eA s 6F3(:)Q J41311. Of Wl YeAr Hu i l t a 191 `� Story Height: far ound F 1 oor Ar vA a Cir oss Nui Idlt1y Arc?,Aa Y68 car clar agw w c-if bedrooms abi.rvp yr adw: 1 !� l ail 1 bAtto% .abtivr- clr Ad*- 1 # -',/4 both% above gradem N 1 i"' ho4t fps abcevw ijr ;sde Hasement Finishimis (jx Wai kraut H,o%wFntat-,t r-#t i nqa �> C'e•itral Afro MARV,ET UA f A S.a 1 w AMOUn t ... a 134.1 a D.- tab.... 8 /04 Effpc.tj ve Front Footagw.. . Effective 4/FF'a Huytara Ryon 64960 E X T KAS a F'or r.h 5i Mesa 140 'ic r een Porch f ll,r•� � Por c h a Not. k: a 204") MAM Floor Flo-oplacer Ratings I"rl:emf,+1t F,F' Rat i um /4 i RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 4C►64 NORTH SHORE DRIVE 39071 17'2 3440061 CITY Or ORONO PR r FF,TY DESCRIPTION L_ AN 01 Land Ar f-A t l C►(jl)+► H.I 11, La 1 N1 YprAr Hut 1 t s 1958 `itor Y HetUht a 125 Gr ot. ind F1 clor Ar efa a 891 �:ri nay BLI) I d l ny 1 l 14 r ar ge.r:►gf- N of hedr-tNom% ahovt graelWe 4 M ft+1 1 hit h!s atlavar cdradet i 0 3/4 baths a►bovw quads t► 4 1 /7 bat.ha Above- tar Adt.- 1 1+<Imeme o f F t li f tit► t nq a X)% Waal kvxjt He ratings L:entrAl At i MAf-f'E T DATA S,c, I e +14moun t ... s , , e Fi7C1'• Front Fcmtoge.. . F4fecttvav S/FFs Hu ycor a PAL_ I. E R 71(" E x T RAH e Pcwch 'yt aws* f31 or ad a Sc r own Pear c h 1)pvn PLW r h e Dvf M. t MAtri Floor Firepl-oce Rattnge {4,-,efr*Prlt F"r" F At 1 ICI! 1 '7 Ll 9 RESlDFNT lAl SALES DATA 136u ARBOR S7 1810117233, 1 UV 48 C I I Y OF ORONO PROPURTY DESCRIPTION LAND: L,o..nd Ar F•r+: 560e) WILDINl Ye•ftr PtAi 1 t e 1 g4ti St.or v Heeight.e ic►,i far mind F t cmr Ar r•.. s firowti Hui1deng t r.,ar cl,�r;�grr u of t)vdr-oiLm% aboyer rirad*et 2 p tt!.1 1 bottoo sibover ear adeet 1 N / 4 hat hs above yr mdE• e.1 4 ! V2 1►.aet hw .iboyv cir ildv +► 14,mura nt �ie)1"t+1flu 1 11,.1% WAIAewet HA4%fl relt r -i !eerli +i Ceerctr'ki Air I MARVA.: f DATA S,iAIV fM,0urlt... s SoIr Dater... s F1704 Efffe•r..f ivee Fr wit. Footage.. Lwffec-tivw #/FFI Hu ywr s kf*. US 6-Ci>()f) F X 1kw5e f'c>r��h � ►: ea�si Sto- an Parch MAIf F it++r FIf-ONPIA(-' r Ratings i, .aa ou.-1,► F- e-' kat 1 net! 18 ie HL.S I DENT 1 AL SALES DATA 22"10 F RE W—H CREEK CIRCLE 301 t i 1 172;'332r iOr_►3 c 1 T Y OF ORONO PROPERTY DESCR1P1 ION LAND: Lsrtd Fit.) I L. D I NO YeAr E+u i 1 t t Story Heights lii► tar ucind F 1 ocif $-W ea s Ori ms Sui ldina7 Are. Y",I 3 car char+q.. N u# t►wdr-c-")m* 'Ah'iVe qr-all"t 7 r {ull toAtV.% abcpvow orarir N 1/4 baths above grade- '► • 112 bat tt% apbovrrr nr e►rIw Sam sewwn t waallw wt easp"Wnt r aat ►►,rtr I; atrlt t r ak l Air ► I MAPI1 F. T DATA Sale Amount ... 1 5,50000 �alw Dote ...i 8 7 u 14, F ++rrr.t i vra Frant F c►c-)t age.. . k++wc:tivR */FFI 1,►iywr a IlORNEV E x TiRURS i F-' car ch g 1 a e,* t (+) aa"dt Screen f'c ch t 11 urn porch: N Lkr, k: i V.", 2 Main F l ocir F r r et► l ac as k-4t i nq' 2 14o%wrripr•r a-F t-.#t Ifig 1 3 �9 E RESIDENTIAL. SALES DATA 1925 EAGERNESS PT RD 381711723231019 CITY OF ORONO PROPERTY DESCR I F' r I ON LAND: bUIl.U1N13 Vs-ar Hui 1 t t 1964 Story NetUht: 134:1 (iresttr►d F 1 cr,r Ar p i s 1 419 C3ros� Nut ldinu A► -pa: 1419 2 car gar.eye► N of b"drooma above grade: t M 4t41l hathro above yracler 1 N 3/4 baths Ahtwk+ c1r ade 1 N 112 baths Aboyfv , tir.ndrs 0 Hoss►Aent Finishit►r_Is Ott% Waal Ikout. bs%ament, r-.At i nfj: MARKET DATA Sale Amount...: ale Date...: U610 Effective Frc,rtt Foot.nge... F.4 feet: ve */FF: Huyer: PLETSCH EX TRA!i: (-ur ch Si tees UI aze.d: Screen Pc►rch Open Porch: DrcI t `.46 Main FIc".)r F►r aplar: r Elating: l.�t"/Itrd1 1111 t e1'r�f;kyt►ik'rr. {-1` Fti�attt�tJ: 1 4 0 0 RESIDENf1At_ SFLE3 DATA 3690 1 OGO RD 3817116'.)26 C 11 Y OF ORONO PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LAND: Land Ar•eH: HUILUINU Year Nisi 1 t: 1956 Story Height& 100 Ground Floor Ar va: 1 02H ilross Buildinq Area: 14 J8 2 (:car qAr agar N of bedrooms shove gr ed-?: I 0 full baths above grade 1 4 3/4 bath-., Above rjr-ader 1 4 1 %;' baths Above -1r a+dw 1 HasHme n t F a n i sh i r:y: rsY. Wet I,c-Hat Basement r stings Central Air: �2 e . I DATA Sale Ornount.... : =3-A 1 e Date... 87(14 . kfif-ctivr- Front Footage... Effective #1F-F: Bove'r": F4F111Ek: 64000 Screen Porch I rl, «-„ t t r I I I: Dec k: Ma -IF) I lour- I ireplascer kastings fi-+s:�'m��rit I•-i'' kat�rlyi 11 RFS T DEN I I VlL SALES DATA :3t i25 L I V I NGST UN FIVE V61 71 1 72-34.3UC►44 h I I Y OF Gk(lNn PROPERTY DE SC:R I p C J UN L.ANns Land Ar era: 1341)(1 EUILDING Y aair Nu 1 1 t : 1920 F,tc►r v Hei glit s Wf) Ground Floor Area, t 1 1 4 1 Oros, Bui ldinq Area: 1141 1 cor gsr�.►.1e it of badrnom�, Above qr. dka: 11 +iA l tlath-, rbovw prade 1 M :/4 hathv► ibnvka qr .acisr RA%pufnent: F1n1ashinv73 ',►%: Wmlkvut Ha-semcant. v ►i litri: I.f-rit r al Fri r t 1 MARVET DATA Snit e: AnIULIFIt ... t Si4I t� Date.... a7C►5 F++ecti vex Front Footeg►e.. . F++art ive *!FF s Kiyors HUHI_E'N 76900 E WTkASI Porch S1 2«—,is c-d: bcr Pen Parch tops-n Purc_ht Dock: Main Flow- Fireplace katangt 1"M%etaw-It FV ke.t angs ;0 0 E !14. RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 3559 LIVINUSTON AVE 381711723430048 CITY OR ORONO PROPERTY DESURIPTIUN LAND: Land Areai 13450 BUILDINU Year Paa, i t s 190 Story Hc?.ights 1!5, Eirncind E I uor Ar &A: t3 Ur*ass Pui tdi►sq Area- li►�►r► car uara►t�r M of bedreuam-s above qr -,►_ice: is N f►:1 i b.►ths above~ cjr:oieo 0 N 3/4 baaith% abovw gr .*dp N 112 b.4.t h-i Above qr ,.,dc a F44-seo,men t F i rt i 4ol i i1q s i.►:� W.41kotat BASOM10411t r<attiai.�s �► !'►�a�tr.! Furs MARKET DATA SA1 a AmOLii►t ... : sal p Ua1;r.?... s 8709 Lf+ectsve- Froiit Footage... Effective ,/FFt Piaye?r : L E: F F_bVREr /CARNLS E XIRW;I Vor- h :iizlP43e I 1 A. ed s Sc. r ewn Peer c h !►1>e'it Vort hs Dwc.k: MAio Floor FFireplat.ea katingt f4p%vnwnt FF' Fiat ir.gt :�4 E-1 RESIDENTIAL. SALES UA TA 2259 SHAUYWOOD RD �y8171 1 7 � .:54-_•�.l 127 GIIY OF URUNU PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LAND L and Ar ea: 5145 BUILUINU Yrar F+ct i 1 t t 19 Story Hvightt 24m) Ground F 1 oar Ar eo t 1201) t3rc►S% but. idinq Nr eat '4i►t► c ar garage? M of bedrocims above greed•_ t! frill baths above tar ertt, I i N 3/4 bath% above grade M ! /i t►oth% Atinvre gradr+ batsemmnt Ftntshtnyt (;") Walkuut KA—S mwnt ratlncle fj Cwritr,ol At t .? Mf;ItkE] DATA Sr 1 � Arnt►►.u►t ... 1 Lola L) ...1 8612 F_t fwr live t=ront: Foutaye.. . Vifecttve $/FFt Puyer-s SCHAVER 690o(t t k 1 RAS t Flarch S1Z1lRit t;lazc--rie ;�-rtren F'r�rch U!►wn Vorct►s 120 Dec t 564.1 Matn FIx►r- Flreplac:e Ratings ►'0-,eme+nt P FF Rat t r►ct t .22. 0 RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 2227 SHADYWOOD RD '61711 72343C►143 CITY OF ORONO PROPERTY DF:SCR 1 P 7 I ON LAND: Land Are:+: 12500 8011_D I N(i Yereir Elul I t r 1910 Stc-)ry Height: Tar ound F 1 c,c)r Ar eN.: 640 Gr t)4:.% Pui ldinq Ar-Pas 74cJ 1 r ar q it aq4 # of bedroomq above grades t� N fl.tl l ttv.th s -4bove w rAdv �► M _3/4 hatti% mbovrt grado M 1 /2 ha:th% ^tjttvg r1r „rde ►:► PA-,v6mmit. F:nt%hing: I Wsal.kc►ttt iia%empnt rot. irig: �► MARK ET DATA Sale Amount...: Sale Date— I 8/09 Effc-dive Front Footage... Effeact i vp S/FF: f4t.iyer : DIAMOND 56000 VXIRASI Pctrc:h St ze!a: li l a c. "41; Sc r Peru P cxr r I i (4-0.11 F'cJr ct►: Dec ►, : Mein Fiocw Fireplace► hating: H,4,4"mR+n t V f=, Ra l -. ny t a3 10 0 1111111,11111,11w RESIUENTTAL SALES UAIA :*,(u.r OLIVE AVE 181 71 17t.'. %44V+:169 C 11 Y OF ORrINO PRDPf RI Y DUSCR I NT I ON LANDS HIItI.DINO Year Hui 1 t. s 1920 Story Heights 100 Gr cn ar►d F 1 uar Ar ea t 1 +J 1 H Cirow4 Bvi lding Areas 1018 C mr clear Ayf-N M of hedre►tuns abuv" grade: (► It ftlt l L—tht. ahuve wede U N 1/4 baths above qr adK /I M 1/:: haths .4t►f!vi- lit, -deg P-!wmr itt F•ini%hsri.ls ;i WaI 41 s+it it#+p aiownf r a I i#�rjI () MFikk E T DA i A Sale Amount ... s Fffe• tiw- Front Footage... Ff fart s. vw S/FF; t:+tjYlsr s W )OU 68 4►0 t_ x T 04AS s Perth Ss rams 81a._AriI Screen Porch Opt-r► P(0(11, 1.w-c k s M.a t o f 1 furr Fireplace Ratings 0 A RESIDENTIAL .;ALES DATA 3i6F# LAFAYETTE kIDGE COURT +81711 7'2 A44:)cU91 CITY OF ORONO PROPER l Y DE.SCR I P-f l Ott LAND. : LAr,d Ar1 HUIL.UIW Year Elu 1 1 t. i 1 qW-j Story Heights 140 Gro4irsd F l our Ar vat 1 '47 OrCISI 81-111Cixnil Ar-eai 1.'47 �.. c f1r 7Ar Age N o1 bedrooms obove graoloi 2 N 44AI1 both" abrove grode 1 M t/4 hatha above gr efdo �_► M 1 /<, botha otor"VP fir i+deg E+oaw#+wt*nt Fir+lrl�lrryi:,r wa 1 b ol.4t rom% rowmt. 1 s•r,t ► .11 Air? 1 MARKET DAIA C; a I f- Amo4m P t ... s 1 54.)C ) Salty 1)ate?...: 97075 Ef+mt. t1 vfa Frocit. Footage... E ++erc t , ve /FF : Huyvr s [30L.RREkG t X IU%,ii:i1 f nr C It I S O I& t l,I..ttr(it Sc reeyfi Porch Oprr# por c h i :" Uarc k i 1 r N) Main F l nnr F i; ell l &cr Rot i "t H.,-wm+•i,f IFk.af i r1q: 45 � s 0 RES I DEN'(I AL BALES DATA 2794 CASCO F•O 1 NT RD Z.82011721 5234its 1.3 MY 1 Y OF ORONO PROPERTY DE SCR 1 P'l PIN LAND t Land Arpas 1 1 _ 7 L411ILD1W Year beetlts IY41 Story He i qh i_ s 1 t.m.► ground F 1 c.►or Ar PA I H4H fir to%ss Hui Idinq Ar,(Pa 1 84H c.or (Jor wq#. R of bads•oom!s ohl-ve 4rsclMs a"s M Ful l bath% at)( ve gr'+de e.1 N 5/4 bath% alb(:svr! fit jkdo r N 1 /2 flirt 11%. ahover + I r iAde e e @, a*%, v wnt F i rs s ut► i+ o i )% Wei lwc>.et Pas"MVI'lt r at i nq s Carztral Air s MARKET DATA fi r41 a Amos_e r i t ... t .ale lute... s B/ts�, Lffeerctive Fresrtt vout age... U44ort:ive f/FF.- 14uyerr a JLMNSON 78,000 F:.k IRASs Pcsrch 5lzeas I,I Az ec1s I-k went Porch 192 1 ItIern PEW- C. h s Dee 1 t 2i4 Mrsri Fliicsr Fireplace h'atings Ha+�esre�e�t Fstra♦ s r-qs o RES I DEN I I AL SALES DV I A 2715 CAROL. 1 NE AVF `82,j1172 241iilm►7 GITy OF ORONO PRI.+ kT'r DU SCR I P T I ON 1. AND: L at rd Ar a 4 t 1 S(_ )f►t1 MIIL DINti year t4ati l t s 19'I1 !it etr y Me t gh t t ?0O fir mind F 1 our Ar ra t 914 Liross Liu! l t11rid Ar a at 1 7 tQ 2 c ar qar ,4qe tl of h•edr oLwm-4 .above gr odo.*t M ♦t,tl 1 hfttfia ^bovm grade, 0 4 .5/4 hot he abovis qr atdv ;► M 1 j' 2 beet h% at►ove rjr Ad#* 9asammit Finghtngt 0% Wslkcut:. t4.a.%om>rtt /'At. nllt ( t:et,t r ea 1 041 r ! 1 MAkM:F. f DATA ' ii l e Amount ... 1 1245(.0 ►. t +ect. t ve Fr +::uvt. F not *cje.. . Fftet ttvw */FF= Ru y er t St AkL F x I k.S e Porch Si zrwei lil02"1 14crt.ert Parch 1►tipt, t'r,rche DwEIVI Mee►n F1►" t tre►p1aca Rrtt"gr F'A+.etaawIt F t k,at i rtgl 0 E RE91 DENT I Al. ''SALES DA 1 A 'A) 5- ;'t:INI RD '3'2►.)1 1 72 '.'S44 * )(.)I I L I TY OF (►RON(l PR(. PEF T V DE. 5CR I P 1 MN LAND s L aind Ar f-,:: 1 : y�►!ip DUILDtNt Year bu i 1 t. 1 1970 Story HeiAhts 100 Ground F l scar Ar r*a s t Gr<.ss1� Building Areas 1092 N jai hedre)-tou tlr ade1 1? N full k at h% abovN 1tr aclw +:s M .1/4 bast h% ahovH ur idw 4.1 N 1 /;� t�:t1 t�R. wt,..,vb• ryr adel• '' �er�ae�rnt F'trtiist�l►u(s �►;, Wal kimat P-j* awr►t. r at t wIs C,.Wfvt r rl Ai f l 1 MARKE T DA 1 A yaw t P Amount ... . S L"At:e... s 061 F4 4ect i ve F rc.,nt Fcx►t ayre.. . Effie-t-tive 4 VFs 1s41•,er 1 .FERUEt= 900( .) Ex1R WE,i Porch Si less 141 a s wd I Sc r own F' cal► c h Main Floor Fa►ppl*e.1+ Ratings F+..%"wfot. F i' F4at i riye .219 u J RESIDENTIAL SALLY UNIF► ""Ho HOLL.ANDEE_k RD --8?`51 1 S`"3430Q 1' CITY OF OkONU PROPERTY DUSC:RIPTION LANE) t Lai -id Ar eA t 1 n6850 bt.)11-UING Year Rut I t. a 1900 Story Heetght.t 11m1 Gr nund F 1 (le1. Ar e.a s ,619 Urc)%% Nut l di no Ar elat �1619 S car tpoor •.tit. M of beds uc,ms abovta gf-adet M 1 to 1 1 ta.•t l fs above of atcte 0 ...;/ 1 bath9 above grade t► M 1 i2 atrcivv grade 1 hits "Poet Fint%btr„Za a.►ti Wa1k.n►.tf Hosement r-.t►ng1 MARL,: IE i DA I A scaler Amc)uv,t . . . i Soil 1ea Vxr+ ". . . . 8 Pvt. F.`4ec.ttve Front Fuutage... E4*eLtive t/FF: Etttywr a UAS1,01 .Y Pur ch '.st xlsst 01 r.r VA t 9<-:r Nen F'cw c h t 1peot+ `,clr t h t 76 trec fr t 434 Ma t t t F E emr F t r ap1 .ac a R a t i nq t 4 0 Va•tit r ► r t 1 It kcat t fall 4 ,Ib I(* L* FESIDLNI'IAL SALTS DATA Y, TANOLEWOOD RD I" T T Y OF ORM'O PROPFRTY i)E-.scRiFrJ(JN LAND: Land Arra.: 84200 NO 11'. D I NI-) Year bl.-Ilti I'MI) ':'story Heightt tl")() Grot-ind Floor Arpat Uro%% NiAt I d i iiq Are, --A I d 'Mr year 40ye bedro(sms ahv�,,o ov-,ldet 4 ti full bAthN ab,.)vsp .,Of? 14 '44 both% above! grek-le 1 $1 1/2 baths atorpva- rjr-wit, Bauemont rini%hititp ."-'% W & I I, out P - kssp m*r , t r .4 i # iti s coottrAl iiir -. I MARKET DATA Sale Amount... : 340000 Front Foutage... Huye c UELE(WAKS FXTRW,i P, -3r t h i z N -A s (;j a f-d' Screen Purch 220 Opt-ii Iyorch: 132 Doc V s 220 M�%Y) Firepla-c-ri Patingi 4 k'-q� 4 Opt-rit FP Ratin(Is IV RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA :31 5 JAMF.STOWN RD _ie �ti 1 i F3:?..3'_�ttC►c.14 1.11 T Y OF ORONO PRUPERTY DESLP t P 1 i ON LAND: L-and Arr-a: +f 11 L_U I NG Yc-ar built: 1 961-. Story Heic7hts 2(m) Gr'Gund F loch Areas 1644 bf-0%% F4LJl l d 1 tty Areas 2t)::: �? ra►r qar acla ;i of boadrooms abovez qr adei 4 H {�_�11 tthy t�hc►vP (jr-cif! N '4 baths .Ahove gradede .e U tl 112 Abovc nr olf- 1 baluvmvrlt. Fi11ilfliilq: c� b1.41t:olit. 14-ascamt-rit r,tt trails t 1."Pil, ral {Airs 1 MAR.K.E f DATA Sale Amount...: 248000 ';el c? Vat,?... s 8705. LJfecti ve Fr vnt Footage.. . EffPc.t i ve f/FF: Niiytzr: AWE_ F XTRAS: Porch S►.zo%: Fil a+ze-ls McrWNart Porch 168 111rr•tt F'c.,rrh: becF: s 192 M.iivo Floor FiroplaLr. Rating: 2 +a+-.,F.•��r�rii F F' k.+t iny: 33 RESIL)EnriAl_ SALES DATA 42'r.► TURNHAM RD 3831118`_231 3,0002 C I I Y OF MONO • PROPERTY DF= SC:R I P T I UN LAND: L.arld Aran: BUIL.DINsl Year Built: 1975 Story He:, qht : I Ur'► Ground Floor Area: 1440 Orciss. Hui ldinq Area: 144r.► car gar tiq• w M i:f bedrooms above gr,adt&: q 4 i11 baths at.►uve urradtp 1 M 3/4 baths above grade � M 1/2 bath-, aibcwt- grade Fasement Finishing: 130% Walkt�t_r! Basement ratings 4 isCvt.rral Airs MARKET DATA Sale AmriTTr►t.... 126000 3Al t.r D'A#"0... . F3 Uh Lf4ti( t ivt: Front Footage... E44trct.ive !/FFs Hr.rytrr s EILkU F_" x T F: r �:• Porch T-�1a..•r•cis Screen Porch 1 ppri E'or I, : N—c k s Main F 1, ow irubpIaLa Ratings t'ar5a�r►r:•rit. t i F.af ings H i 3�_ 0 L, U RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA WOODHAVFN DR 'S83 - F-11TY Of- ORONO PROPERTY DESCRIP 110N LAND- L and Ar eri. C) BUILDING Year builti 1904 y HL 1�i) Stacy cv, -i(lht3 1 - Gruund Flc)cpr Arf,t.t: 141ij Groris BUIldiliq Artea 3 141(-) 1 car (liar age # of bedrooms ab(3vL- sjr i # full balth% Ahlr)Vt- (jr,.ALh,- I # 3/4 hat.h-, abovv qri-cls-t # 1/'2 tmAthS i4ho,— qr,ids- Ba-ivoppmit Finishiviq: o()% WAIkULA' Ha-A"awnt. r,*timio it rviii r al 141 t i Mj)Rjfj:_'1 J Ir - ?AJA Sa l Amount ... 136000 Sa I k.? DAt e. . . : 8 7 ().3 1-44ective Frunt. Footage — Effective */FF; 14uy1?r : R I CHARDSON 1, )('1 k As I Porch sizes: OW-.n Pcjrihx .12 M-4iti Flucn Fire. F44-.."meot FF' Rat., s)r.rfpien Porch 192 I fig: 11 RES L DEN T I AI._ SAL -ES DATA 130 HACKBERRY H I L_ . 18' y 440()22 CITY OF [IRONTI PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LAND t Land Area: 1710) BUII..DINt3 Year Built: 1966 Story Heights lou Ground F l caur Areat 1(.)14 Gruss BUi ldiny Areat 1+:►14 1 car gar ages M of be'droorn� abov" c.IradEat �► M full bath% a4boveo (:radee 4► it -'Y/4 ba►t.h4A abrave yr- 4de,? ►.► 4 1 2 bathn above c►r.-d*- , Baesement. Fir! ► %h i nq: t►% W*Ikc)+at Ha,&wmsvtt ratintit MAt* E-.1 DA rA Fa 1. N AMOUnt ... : Sale Date...: 870.3 Effective Front Footage... Effective t'FF: Hi► y tar- s MUC; k: H 15(d(.) F,?c IHAS I P r•ch Sizes: (;I a: wdt 5r. r -ern Por ch III,F•►i Pcwct►t Vec► t M-t►n FIaor• Fireplace Ratings tC..F-ntr.i! r1► N:+ ..t•n,«rrt Ft- Net Inyt ���� h 7� ,ram •. - .��• . # �'1 y p. ,r► F;F r T DF N I I AI._ SAL_E�i DA I A 7: Y5 DICKEY L . AF."E. DR 383411 823..''20 ►V6 CITY OF GRONO PROPFR rl' DE:SCR I P f I ON L. FAND : L wid Area: 91t>c?i.� HI.JILDING Yt-cwtr Bui 1 t : 1986 Story Ntr i ght : 2100 Ground Fluter Arvi4i Ora%% S,ii ldinq Ar-Ra: 1646 c Ar yarage M a+ bedrooms a►aove rlracla: 3 N +u1 I b, -t Li% Meove fir Ai_ita .. tl '_N/4 hothv. At-cv-v (:Trade t) i! 1 /t b"'t h., «,L , wE• r+r•.etjF 1 S.ARemeflt Virriahxi1rl: Walkout BA,,wn exit r.4k i ncl: Cer�41'aI Fitt 1 MARKET DATA Si+I a Amount. . . : 165(jt)0 S:.rte Gate...: 874_)7 E 4 4 tart i ve Front f nat a(4e.. . F=4+ec_tive i.'FF: Lit tyer : MC KAY /' F X I RAS: Parch Sine-&& NI a-t-N: ,.ic:r wen F'q srch 1.68 Optrr 1 F'(,r c. h t 88 1)w i- 1 41 ti M,,irr Ftcr<jr Fireplace RatinrT: ", V44%eratrr,t F F' h +t i ng i 7 E 0 RE"-,1DEN rIAL SAL.ES DATA 1555 ORONO OAKS DR 3E3.-.-'v5 I I E1 3W()(-)(:)7 CITY OF ORONO PROPERTY DESCRIPTION L. AND e Lauri Arppi HUILDINO Ye.*r Ri-tilt: 1981 Story Height: 101) Ground Floor Arvae 91 Oros% buildinq Arta: 3391 4 car- npr ape # of bedrooms above grade: # 4 Li I I bathe, atbr-A'Vf? gr Ade- j './4 baths above grado I hAth% f4hc.ivf3 (ir-Adu- I Walkout HAsernrent rAttnq: I Cent rotl in I r MARKET DATA �i,A I e Amclim i I . . . t 432500 I � I e Date. . . : 8 708 1 4 -4 r-c i j vr.- Front Vocit a4le . . . F 4 4 v! i i ve 4 /F 1 Royer yer i IS W ; 4 N 17'. rksV-i: fit_ re Porch 6 I-Aec: b : 596 N!-itie Vk..)ur Vie#rpl.4ce- Ratings 4 I. f t 1-1-i I F'111 0 0 RE`3I DEN r I At . SALE S DA rA 1240 LYMAN AVF B.` 51 l82 4.3i►►►24 L I T Y OF ORONC► F=ROFERTY DUSCRTF' l ION LAND: Land Ar e•a s "< 4 '3t-►►_i HUIL.DING Year Vui 1 t : 1977 Story Height) 2t►n Uround Floor Ar ee4I 1,731 Gross BUi ldinq Area: 3 car (_)AUP(If- M o+ hedr oom% ah(.)Yv (Ir ade.: _ N 4 ul I hot tor. otbove yr Afit• 1 N t/4 bath% Abovto gr-adr4 l 4ev% aseanL F itii %himgs -'t ) Wa l ti fwjt ►" at l ntj : b prifr'a) f%irl MARKE: r DA I II) SAI r i�m�►unt...: 31-50000 Sole Date...: r37U1 Ff4ective Front. Footage... Ffftrrt.►ve► f/FFI RLJIY :-r- : I , KNWAI_ I. F:.XIRASI Porch SI 10,43 ICI axed: Screen Porch I 1peri f+-.rt h I llwc k:: 331 MAin Flntyr F r•"),lags# katingl 4 39 0 E RE5I DENT 141._ SALES DATA :' 'r_► WAKEF 1ELD RU 8':6 1 182 1 QQ 10 C I TY OF UR11NO PRUF*FRTY IiF_SCH I P F I ON LAND: Land Ar&as t) BUILDING Year fsui I t: 198"1 Story Hei (tht.: 115 Gr c-Und F 1 Or)r Ar• r- , s :1944 t3rU%%i BU i l d i nrl Aw ea: 4132 '. c Ar Flar atte+ M of tlr drlw: 4 N fall yr'rsde hbt to,Ah ( , VF. rrI Bat=:e4mant Fig=iyh.inr�; i,r:ri Wal k.ru.rt '�+..a:,��rnr�rri r ar t rr�lr '• Central Fur: MARKET DA iA '�',al e Amount ... h4f i NA) Sat.P DaAt:r Ft7O! Fffe:r_tive Frotit Foot arge... E f f fact i v e Ir. l i Bover: Lf'WI:. (-0 i+,•+tdz :`4' Sk.rfac+rr t=`rx-ch Cipf. rr f'r=r c I : rwc k s M«;rrr VIc)ga FIrepiarw Parting: 4 F;_;<,r-•q,� rrt t f' k'.4l ln(js 4 ;E 2 I(* RV91DENTIAL SALES DATA 6R5 OLJ LONG LAk..E RD 3836 1182332000 7 CITY OF' ORONO PROPERTY I)ES(:R.tF-'11(.)N L AND P Land At rorRt Fj I (.)(.)Q BUILDING Year Builts 1961 Stcwy Height: 2f.)C) Gromid Fl(ior Arf..mt 1 Grosm 141ti1dinci Ar"a: 2 1 i4 r rj.., r , f I s+ 0 c-*4 bodr (funs, atkove grad*,: 4 4 4tdl OfOtt% Hhove qrAdv 0 7/4 b,*tlis. abo-,? -)rado- t / �, tj A f t I �i ;4hl Vw- fit, 4416- m p efflvl I t V, I f ! I %h I f 14-11 4:" 1% W-1kCnit Bo%omcnt r-of t ncl i MARK.Er DATA Sale Amotont ... : '357000 S'Ale D.41:w ... : 8 7 C.)R- F+ +1-4-t i ve- Front Footage.. . L44eutive */FFt lit# vc r Mi+HKISPERRY 1~ x ) PW': Pop -J) sizp�bl 1c .0 1 Screen F--C?v,-h 11116-is 1-firchl 1'ps1 DPP 4 1 31.4(.) Maim f tc-n.r- Fireplaco Rr*tinqv 6 Al'of I f r a 1 A 1 r ? I k1ti-It-ml 41 it F V Rat 1 1-1(1: n 10 I* r:&&, 40, 1p RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 146 CHEVY CHASE DRIVE ".83611823410045 L I I Y OF CIR. UNO PROPERI Y DE SCR I P I I ON LAND: Larld RIJ I L 1) 1 NO Year Bui I t 1 19!)6 Story Height: 1'."1 Urnttnd Floor fArp"i I R (*-oss BuIldirig Ar-eA: 14 r-larapp # of brdructmi; above (irwies 4 0 fell bath% above cir-etcle I 0 __%/4 bath% Aboyo -wadip 0 1/*" hfiths 'Al"Pvo, 'It W-41 Ifolit H-pabims,f) I r .,k C i ( al t Con t rid 1 Air I MAR4�ET DATA Sale Amount I 16(:)5(")1') Sale Date—i a'/ tj F) F#fective Front F out age... Ff+t.!.f7tivfa $iFF? buyear ! T Epto � E x I a Sc_ tere n Porch IM.1 Oper, Puwch: I)w Mill) FICL-W vAreplac. F:�l +wmwpnt FP Ratinyt 0 RF S I DENT 1 AL. SALES DN T A 05 NUR'THGATE: 38361 182 - 3, 44(M)16 CITY Uf~ UHUNO F'kl)PEHTY U[SCR 11:17 1 r_)N LAND i L. w r 1 d KU LUINU Yo-aur El i 1. t i 1 104t St or y Het cTht s I Oo Ground Floor i,r F-ns 1 H64 Of as% Hui tdinq Ars-t. 1t1b4 1 ver gar+arae► N cif bedr ooms a buvra kir ereip: 1 M f U 1 1 L►At h9 ObtlVe qr ads• 1 M 3/4 bath% stove graflo i M 1 ! he+t t)% at►tave! t}r m t.i t+•.e�e*tuer�t F=tnlshtri)s t.4i�;. Wei leaut 140%vainrrrt t r.t „„); MAHKF_ T Dki n 9 ✓l_Hj(-) DAt.N... . 87045 F. 4 4 t c. , : e F=r cant F-catit 8(jo.. . E. 4 e t F ti I pf i- F •i :-aPs i t.l . �;c r f?trrt h'car E t► r r I t s f}e►e !• i' 7 6 t^•r f if FirpplAce Past.}rirJi 4 if* I ('*fitr&.1 Air s 1 F4,, hAt sr,tas -1 y3 Section 2 All Lake Sales Used in Sales Study Alphabetically Arranged by Bay Then In PINY Order RESIDENTIAL SALES D, 3516 IVY PLACE 382o 1 1723421(jQ22 CITY OF ORONO Minnetank:a Garman,. bay 46 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LANDS Lard Areal 16800 BUILDlr:d Year Sui l t I 1935 Stol"y Heights 100 Ground Floor Areas 1232 Oross Bus ldtr(Q Areas 1232 2 tar gar mgvw N of bedr Oc5)n,. above grades M f )_t 1 1 feu+ h', abovo yr ade M 3/4 baths above grade U M 1 /2 bathe abuive grade U basement F i n i 0i I r►g I 70% Walk (myt bawetne()t r .►t) n(s I 1 MAHI(.E T DATA S,%1e Amount...: 16B` )(.-) .I — Datr...s 8612 L 4 4 ec t i v t- r` r ctn t F cx., t ag a .. . F++e+ct l ve .t/FF t H)1)'ers WNIIF /DAVIS 1.X T*HASs Puy c h S l t'I _i s li 1 a r 0(1 s Screw., Pur c h 241► t'perl f't)rr to- ckpclk Ma i n V 1 oor t( r (vp 1 a(-e flat i r►q 1 6 L.crr)trRt1 Ell• I I 1 F heat IricUs h • RESI D NT I Al_ SF'LES DATA 35.i2 IVY PLACE 8201172-342► 03. CITY Cl' ORONO Minnetonka Czar manF. Hay PROPERTY DESCRIPTIt',i LAND: Li.na Areas 1►>t►�►:': BIJIL.DING Yr'ar Built: 1935 'story Heights 140 Grotmd Floor Area: 15 37 GrosQJ B►.:i 1 ding Areas .537 c. a+r uar acae k of bedroums abr-)v..a grads 2 k ftc.l ' baths above cqr actr, 3 k I14 bath% above grAde ►> M 112 Laths above ryr,ade ti Nasrrment Flni%hiiigs W.,% Wa11►�ut 9a►eement ratings '5 MARKET DATA ;a 1 t>-Amnunt_ ... s 2225ri� i bale Dates... s 8704 Effective Front Fvotage... Ff i — • t L' i/I'F 0 0 y.rt . 41n I I•a• I EX I-FWi: Porch Si zees GI k:-ed. Screen Porch 213 Upc-ri Por c h s Task le s 21 Main Floor Fireplace Ratincls h 1,eiitral Airs i+.,semeflt F-P katinrl: 6 !~ J RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 32:31 CASCO CIRCLE 382U11723430016 CITY OF ORONO Mi nrrfntonka Car mans Bay PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LAND: L and Ar cn,4 : 30400 BUILDING Year 9-4 1 t: 19 Stor-y Height: 24',(, Ground Floor Areas 15 79 Bross Building Area: 2849 1 'ar yaragfe M of bedrooms above grades } N full baths above grade 2 N 3/4 baths above grade 0 0 1/2 baths above: grAdea 1 Basement Firiishinq: 0 Walk(yut HasPme•nt ratznr,: U MARKET DATA Sale Amount...: 290000 ile Date...: 67(►2 d [.i fs>c:t e Front Footage.. . Effer-tI Ve $/FF: FHuyer : LUGN' EXTRAS: Porch Sizes: 61 az Otis Screen Parch 487 Open F'urc.h: Deck: 110 Main Floor Fireplace Hating: 5 Central Air: 2 14"wment FF' Rating: 3h45 NORTH SHORT DRIVE :ie(;a t 17�.3340007 CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka Crystal Bay PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LAND: Land Arpa: 720(.) BUILDING Year Bui 1 t i 1920 Story Height: 1cii► Gro►ind Floor Area: 904 Qroas Building Area: 904 1 rar gearail" N of bedr•oc►ms above grad"i 2 M full batht- r0twove oracle 1 N 3/4 baths above grade N 1/2 haths above grades �► B a%wtnent F i n i shi nel: Wal ko►.rt Bi Asemer►t r at i ncl: C� MARKET DATA Sale Amount...: 1 10000 Sale Date...: 8706 Effective Front Fuutage°.. . Effective S/FF: Buyer: HYSTONE EXTRAS: Porch Sues: Gl i-- 002 114.) Screen Porch fipen Porch: Der- kI Main Floor Fireplace? Ratinq: 6 ('ent rrl Air: 2 Ha!seament. FN Rat. i nta: r RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 1580 BOHNS POINT RD 380911723330008 CITY OF ORONO Mi nnetonka Crys,ta) Day PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LAND: Land Areas 6975C.) BUILDING Year Nuiltt 1970 Story Heights IOC► Ground Floor Ar tma t 2976 Gross Bui ldi►ig Areas 2976 Z car gar aqe N of bedrooms above grades N full baths above grade 1 N 3/4 baths above grade 2 N 1 i bath% above tirade Q batipmeant Finishingt (N')% W�0. out Haserrnent. ratinyt �! MARV:ET DATA (a a r+'n g�;l} 'gale Amount...: 400000 'dale Date... s 8612 Effective Front Footage... Effective S/FFs Buyers KOVACEVICH E:X TRASs Porch Si ze3%s Gl azetd: Screen Porch Open Porcht 104 Dwcks Main Floor FirHplact- kat:.ngs 3 Central Airs I Hasement FF' Not:ngt 4 RESIDENTIAL. SALES DATA 3145 NORTH SHORE DRIVE 380911723330013 CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka Crystal Ray PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LAND: Lanni Arc -A: 650000 BUILDING Year Puilta 1969 Story Height: 130 Grrund Floor Area: 2497 Gross Bui1dinq Area: 2497 3 car garage M of bedroom% above grade: N full baths above drade 1 N 3/4 baths ,have grade 1 N 1/2 baths above grade 1 Basement F i ri i sh i ng: &:► Walkout Hasement rat.in(l: '1 Co-rit r al Air- I MARKET DATA Sale Amount...: 330000 Sale Date....: 8701 Effective Front, Footage... Effective f/I-F- Buyer: .1ANECh;Y EXTRAS: Porch Sizes: Glazed: Screen Porch 165 Olen Porch: 21: fleck: 32 Main~ F1 r.or r ;+ Nl.a4a RaL.trgs 4 RasemF+rrt FP Ratings 4 -L7 RESIUFNIIAL SALES DATA 2184 8HADYWOOD RD 91711723420006 CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka Crystal Nay PROPERTY DESCRIprIUN LAND: 1_ <•►id A ea: 17225 BUILDING Year Built: 1920 Story Heights 125 Gr ound VI ocir Ar ea s l of)o Gross Building Area: 1209 1 car garage # of bedroumes above grade: 0 N f:.ilI baths above gr;+de C► N :V4 baths above grade u M 1/d bathe.; above gradi- ►) Baseaeetnt Finishing; r►*/ Walkout Basement ratinq: �► Central Airs MARKET DATA Sale AMOUnt... : 125000 Sale DatP... s 8704 Effective Front Fuotage... Effective S/FFs Buyers NICCUM EXTRAS: Porch Sizess Glazed: Screen Porch Open For c h s Decks 280 Main Floor Fireplace Ratinys 4 basement FF Rai i nq s RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 2142 SHADYWOOD RD 381711723420012 CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka Crystal Day PROPERTY DESCRIPTION L. AND i Land Area: 2976o BUILDING Year Built: 197ii Story Height: 100 Ground Floor Areas 154C) Grose Buildinq Areas 1540 1 car garage M of bedrooms above grades 2 tt fu1l baths above grade I M '5/4 baths above grade ►) 0 1/2 baths above grade 1 Basement Finishin(js Walkout Basermrnt ratings 4 MARKET DA rF) a 1 e: An,ount ... : 19 000 Sale Date...: 87<►4 Effective Front Footrge... Effective t/FF: Buyer: s SCHOEN EXTRAS s Porch Size -it (31 azed: Screen F'orLl- (If—ft Porch: Dt,c{ : 246 Main Floor Fireplart., katiriq: 5 Cvntral Airs H<+ ;e�me>r►1 r-F t<<++ irry; 5 11 RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 9: WILDHURST TRAIL 380711723120003 CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka Forest Lake PROPERTY DESCRIPTION L AND t Land Area: 20000 BUILDING Year Huilts 1986 Story Heights 175 Ground Floor Areas 1314 Grows Building Areas 2178 2 car gArAWe► N of bedrooms above grarier: 2 N f►.►11 baths above grade 1 N 3/4 baths above grade �► N 1 /'2 baths .above grade 1 Ffa,Prnea►►t Fsnishtngs !)o% W.41 t cilit Hasement raft inrlt 4 Cetitr.il fear: 1 MARKET DATA .i,+l a Amount.... 14`300 Sal e L;.-At e...: 8702 Effective Front Footage... Effective f/FFt buyers HAWK I NS/L AkSUN EX1RASt Porch Sizess GIaznd: Screen Pnrch Open Par e h t 194 Dec k: t 104 Main Floor Fireplace Ratings 6 Hasnemeent FF' Rating: 0 0 ► 1" H SIDENT1Al_ SALES DATA 4496 NORTH 'SHORE. DRIVE 39071 1 72:5:S 1 CKI)OW CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka Farpst Lake PROPERTY DESCR I P F I ON L.AFJG: Land Areas :25000 BUILDING Year K.►i 1 t s 11?51 Story Heights 1100 Ground F 1 our Areas 1 1:2H Ur-oqi% Buildinq Ar-teat 112R 4 ► rw (,aragH M of bcadrex►m-i above grade: 1 N fiat 1 b.at.hs above yr ade 0 0 .3/4 bathzs above yr.adty 1 M 112 ba hes abuvf± tlr .aclte ►:► Hau"mvnt F i n i sh t. mi t 90% Wa 1 kcKut. "aftement r-st s ng t MAF0,'E F DATA Sale Amount...: 159000 :i,ale l.iate...: 87VB Eff"ct.i ve F"runt Faotage.. . Effective S/FF"s Nuycor : 1 1 MM Forch Si 2eas c.j arfed: 1A rcren Porch Otwf; For ( h: Uwc. : M.+►n F-lc►cbc FirNptacer F<.attnq: 5 0 Cipf,trol Airs F l„ —tfor-fit F Hating; 11 (9 RE:S I DENT I AL 'SALEki DATA 4510 NORTH SHORE DkIVE 380711723310(.129 CITY CIF ORONO Minnetonka Forest L_a Ve PP13 ER TY DESCRIPTION L AND-. I and Area: :--W&Jt> RUIL.DINO Year F4t4i l t.: 197E Story Heiyhtl 14C.r Grotcnd Floor Ar-e,a: 11H1 Urtj%% Iiut lda nq Arwa: ,'18 '_' car garage N taf ber1r;w.jon- .above c4rade: 4 M #till biath% above cii-Ad r 1 M 7�/4 bath-, above Arad. I M 1 / �' b.+t h% above- qr:4df.- + Eagemwnt F 1nt,ahr 1prr: _ Wars k!cxat 8.3114ement t ,.t i fi,r: Cent r %I Ai r : I MARKET DATA fir 1 e Am4:,unt ... a 335000 !-1a1e D,-fte...: 874;4' F_t f et.t i ve Front Footage... F4fe4_t..ive E/FFI 144..4ver : SAW IUK,l E A I HAS: F'c-vrt:h Iii zest UI .4-..ef4: Scrt�t-ri Porch l 1+4 (44 4, F" or c h: 110 De.c k t Y9Y M,+411 F I-,(w Fireplace RartIncat I i:,•.;a m.••f 14 r. 1' #rat. 1 ny: 1 RESIDENTIAL jALE'3 DArA V1NL PI ACE _SG ►7 1172342c), C I I Y Of- ORLIND Mi nnotonka Fcorr.*s.t Lake WiRF, ET DATA LAND: Land Ar vwi: Sc- I v AmOUnt.... s 4 10000 `j�to Date_: 8705 t:++ectivv Front Footage... F+fective $/FFS btlyer: BREDNAHAN 1'or1_h Sizes: O,j J .4 Z Ar- d ' :lc retie Purch Op''ll porchl Dtec k. s 400 M;iii Floor Fireplacea Ratings 3 fi-fiff"I OlIrl I 1:,­t-imaitt FP katings 3 .0 RESIDENTIAL. SALES DATA 1325 VINE PLACE :58071172342t 003 CITY OF URONO Minnetonka Forest Lake PROPERTY UE9CR I PT I ON LAND: Land Are -A- 26000 BIIILDINO Yerr Out 1t1 1960 Story Heights too) Ground Floor Area: f 4i•h Gross Building Areas 1430 2 car garragc- N of bedroom% above graders 4 M full toaths at►csve qr Atfc- I M '3/' baths; abovs- yradrs ; M 1 /2 bath% above- ijr r#du- �l @atsemernt F i n i sh i nq : 80 i Wail kcuat Pa%ement. r :.►t i w i t 1-4-i ► t r a l Airs MARL' E T DATA Sale An ►►►t ... 1 220000 fiAle Date...6611 Effective Front Footage... Effective f/FFt Buyers YOUNG ErTRASt Parch Si zest Glazede Ser-en F'orch 286 Open F`orcht 144 Docks "lain Floor Fireplace Hastings li,i4 i t F V N , ng t 5 0 RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 1330 PARK DRIVE 38071172342-?038 C I 1 Y OF ORONO Minnetonka Forest La1::e PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LAND: Laid Ar c-a i 55000 Bl: I l_ D I Nli Ywar bl-t i l t t 1951 Story Height # l0o Ground F l over Ar eo e 1173 Bross Wilding 11 7.S 3 car qrr Arj" N of bedr-oom-i ahove qr adet M full t).+•_its atmvF- lr,*de I !1 s/4 baths above (Ir adea U #f 1 /; balhc. i+br,vre tlr arlre t) B-ciement F i ri i +stt t by l tK)% Walkout baseapnt. r at I ny a "3 (eartrral Air MARKET DATA Sale Amount ... t 1773M Sale Date...: 8610 Effective Front Footage... Effective S/FFt Buyer t FAIRBAW t.XIRASi �,or-ch Sizertt ..+I oredt Screen Porch 140 Upwfi For cht Deck Main l(w.)r Firs -place Ratingo b h arrff*-tt FP Nat ingl L 1KE SHORE SALES E ACHANGE ADDRESS 2669 Map]y Ridge lane PID R 21 117 23 21 0004 CITY Orono LADE Minnetonka l.af -I"—Bay PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LAND: Total Land Area Topography Shoreline Level Name of Bay— Lafayette (Minnetonka Only) BUILDING: Year Built 19(A Story Height 2 _ Ground Floor Area ,rust_ building Area )6 n Garage Sy. Ft. _ 768 City Services: (Sewer) X (Water) EXTRAS: Fireplace Porch (Sq.Ft.)_ 02en 210 st Baths (size)_ full 2 314 1 1!2- Finished Basement (%) B(J:l Central A.C. 4dl kout t4 COPMRTS : MARKET DATA Sale Amount. . . . . . . $ 339.( Sale Date 3_g7 Effectiv- Front Footage 150 Indicated Lab,- Value/F.F. (Sale amt. - EMS Bldg. T Eff. F.F. - ILV/FF) ASSESSOR'S VALUATION Total V ion for 19 EMV : o• ? d ngs — EMV fo, d Information Source:_ Assessor Re(orfd Submitted B; • B. Exickxc.un Date: 1 r .1_l 19SH R E S I D C N T F i._ 3 A L E S D A T A ADDRESS County Rd K6 PID p 26 118 -3 34 1 CITY OF ORONO LAKE NAME Long Lake PROPERTY DESCRIPTION MARKET DA"A LAND: Land Ar a 24b, �2 Topography Sh�rrltne BUILDING% Year Built 193� Starry Height 290 Cround Floor Area 32t:' Or- s Bldg Area 6894 Garage Sq. Fk. Att 851 waosr-1 So- ras- 4 0 Firepl ac Baths: % F r Cont. L,nr. ct. C artrn t. le Amount . .Y ,J Sale Date S 86 Ef. f . Fr ,.jn t Footage 330 Effective $/FF 330 Seller White, , .t F. Buyer Brown, Richard E. EXTRAS: Porch GP-1 SP-2 2 Deck Sq. Ft 0 5uurce: F i 1 e Sutun+ .a.d By: City Aoseysor rate: 86-A8-23' rID RESIDENTIAL SALES D A l A ADDRESS 1295 Co Rd 6 PID M 26 118 23 34 2 CITY OF ORONO LAKE NAME Long Lake PROPERTY DESCRIPTION MARKET DATA L-AND: Land .Area 567566.8 Topography Shoreline 'ILL ar Built 19i1 ;ary Height 200 ground Floor Area 4:370 Gross Bldy Area 9-70 Garage Sq . Ft. P t t 1199 Water=l Sewer=Z; Gas=4 0 FirF�.lace Batty: (full) :J/41 1 (1/2) 3 Finished Basement .1 Central A. C.- 1 1 Lineal Ft. Walk%,ut 0 Comments: Sale Amount . .♦ 1250000 Sale Date 7 86 Eff. Front Footage 330 Effective f/FF 330 Seller Dayton, Donald do LuG Buyer Erickson, R & Corty, E , i RAS: P, ch GP=1 SP=2 0 Defy Sq. Ft 0 Information Source: File Submited BY: City Assessor Date: 87-02-02 0 RESIDENTIAL SA'..ES DATA 1160 TONK.AWA RD 38091 172a 130007 C11Y OF ORONO Minnetonka maxwel1 Hay PROPERTY DFSCRIF"110N LAND: Land Area: :•2:'�_i� � OUILDIN13 Yenr F►ui 1 t. s 1964 Story Heights 1C.m.) 13raund Floor Areas 2eb49 Uroc,s Huildinq Area: 26-349 t. ar q,ar arlc tl of berdroumn5 above grades M fi.01 bath% above grade 2 N 3/4 batty" above grade 1 M 1 /;' hAth,.-, above tr Adw o Basement F i n i sh i ricl s 007 We l kout- H.aavment r .et.in1j: Central r,:r s 1 MARKET DATA 5rirz Amount... s 370000 Sale Data...: 8707 Effect.i vas Front Footage... Effective $/FFt Eii..iyer: FEARON E ikASs Porch Sizes& GI axecis "'94 `_icr oe•-n Porch Fq.iert Porc_hs 210 Dock: Matti Fluor Fireplace Ratings 4 k�+;.F�neni i- t.a:trncis 4 RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA A051 FARV IEW LANE: 38(J41172.5330009 CIlY OF OROND Minnetonka Maxwell Day PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LAND: Land Area.: RL BUILDING Year Built: 19e1 Story Height: 20() Ground F I i-por Ar P a t 6 C) R Gros% building Area: 4620 I c car tlarat.jp # of bedrooms abuvf- cir adki l-) # full t—Ath% Above. qrAde # 3/4 baths above or-ade 0 1/2 b;Aihii, Atic-,vf oriAdf... Ftriishinq: !!)()% Walkout Ka%einipnt rat incl: Getittal Airi 1 MARKET DATA Sal" Amount...: 1.110000 e D.1 t. C-. 8050000900 Effective Frunt Footage... Ef+(-Ct.iv(- */vF: Buyer: Wl I. L I AMS F X'l Hits. Puwch (-;I az t-d r Sc.rper. Porch UPP;,lt Pf.-ji ch: Dpc P:: I M-#iri Floor Fireplace Flat tnqa t� ;q flit -I I i I : F , koAt 1 rtc4 . RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 3048 NORTH SHORE DRIVE 38091172332-o0 ►4 CITY OF ORONO Minnet')nka Maxwell Hay PROPERTY D' SC;RIPTION MARKET DATA LAND: Land Area: 5.!X►�"0 Sale Amount... s EUILUING Year Built: 19511- Story Heights 100 bround Fluor Areas 211►� Dross buildino.I Areas II car tj,arayNr M of bedrucims obove yr-adla: N fcill bath% iot-nve grade �? # 3/4 bath i above q -adR i► N 1 /2 hottm Above rlr ,4(u. ►1 Basement F= i n t sh i ncls "-C1k Walkout Paw.6+mra►;t r .at I11q: ►arn t r N l All 220000 Sa1e 1)-at.e... s 87ii1 Effective Front Footage... Effective */FFt Huyert PETERSUN EXTRASt Porch Si rebt Gl rmzreci: 184_► Screen Porch Open Por c h : Deck: Mai►, floor Fireplace Ratings 6 F V 6 0 l 1 3160 NORTH SHORE DRIVE 38091172332(5008 a CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka Maxwell Hay PROPERTY DESCRIPTION MARKET DATA LAND: Land Arpa: 955rl�:►C► Sale Amount... s 150000 HUILDINO Year HuiIts 19 Story Heights ICK') Ground Floor Area: 13.32 Gro%% Building Ar ra: 13:32 1 car garArjp t# cif badrooms Above grades S M i►.ill hathr. ahc►ve- gr^de 1 M .3/4 haths above grade ►:� M 1/2 hHthce, above ctra,Fe fi Basement: Fint%hsiiis -'A) Watt kotit H-4%ermont. r aat i n#j: h Cer►►t r a 1 rii r : Sale Date...s 87"1 Effert i ve Front Fuatagce... Effective E/FFFs H►_►yer : AULL0 EX I RAS: F orr..h Sizes: BI Ax►>d: 156 Screen Pcwch Uper► Porch: (>e,_ L: Main FIo(m� Frreiplacte Hat.ingi 0.5 F4r.`r.-va,.,riI Fr kr+tit,rt; �J d" RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 180 NORTH SHCiRF DRIVE 3809117223.320009 CITY nF ORONn Minnetonka MaxwelI Bay PROPERTY DESCRIPfiON LAND s Land Areas 940ut, F+UIL..DINU Year built: 1910 Story Hr!iclhts 17 tar nand Floor Ar F •,4 s 7 'H Gross Huildinq kr�sa: 1274 2 tar clear #•qw M of bedroom% Al)ovca yr•Qade- M #ull batly% abov" (jrAdp 1 M 3/4 bAt_hs above grade N 112 baths 4bnve ►Iradc- ►! Sasiome►nt Finishinas 4)0 WAI kout fad-iement r ot, i nrls C! MARK:E T DATA salup Amo►►nt ... s 1610c () Shce Date...: 8610 E++emotive Front Footage... F++r-ctive $/FFs Huywrs B1_UMAERS E X'T KAS. s Porch Si tars: Up! a: wl s 264.! Screen Porch Uper, Pc_ -chi DPC k s Main Floor Firepl,4►-e Ratings 0 fairs F•,a+r►►t+!t FF Hatir►,1s in LAKESHORE SALES EXCHANGE ADDRESS 801 Tonkawa Road P I D li_08 117 23 21 0001 CITY Orono LAKE Minnetonka North Arm PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LAND: Total Land Area 152000 scI t. t Tcp)graphy Slone to lalL., Snu,eline good Name of Bay N,,,rr h e, (Minnetonka Only) BUILDING: Year Built 1940 Story Height I U2 Ground Floor Area 741A Gross Building Area '3393 _ + Garage Sq . Ft. 7 3fi _ City Services: (Sewer) Water) EXTRAS: Fireplace Porch (Sq.Ft.) Enclosed 252 Baths (size) full 1 Finished Basement (t) U Central A.C. Ili Walkout---,,,, k6 COMMENTS:_ r'aretaker home also on propeitp MARKET DATA Sale Amount. . . . . . . $ 1,0609000 Sale Date Aug 19, 1987 _ Effective Front Footage 400 Indicated Lake Value/F.F. (Ss1e amt. - EMV Bldg. $ Eff.F.F. - ILV/FF) ASSESSOR'S VALUATION Total Valuation for 19_ EMV for Buildings EMV for Land -- Information Source: Assessor rec:2Lds Submitted 8y:_ g__l ricicsin Da I� RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 700 NORTH ARM DRIVE 3 6061 172.34 30003 CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka North Arm PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LAW): Land Area: 0 BUILDING Year Built: 195b Story Height: 100 Ground Floor Areas 1446 Grose building Area: 1446 2 car gar atlP # of bead-ooms above grades 1 N fel l t aths, above yrade l 4 V4 baths AbLWV� grade !► ►t 1 i1 baths, coot? -v (4r ads u 1{-•.;emont Finit,hintts H()% Walkout Ba3R+nent: rat ir►y: 6 Central Air-: 't MARP::ET DATA Sale Amount...: 180000 Sale Date...: 961(.) F-44 -.tive Front Footage... E• '.ive f/FF: HL+y .�r s HAR1 Y [ X ( RAS: pot-ch Sires: 141:zeds Screen Porch UF:,en Porchs Docks 192 Main Floor Fireplace Ratings 5 M C i t. RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 7'elo NORI H ARM DRIVE 64611 '7 2:�4 �4� �04 CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka North Arm PROF '-RT Y DE_SCR I P f t ON LANDt Land A,- ea: 1127,00 BUILDING Year Bu i 1 t t 1954 Story Heights too Ground F' uur- Areas 1004 Gross, Nui ldinq Area: 1004 2 car garage M of bedroum-� above! grade: 2 N full bath% *,bove cir aciw 1 M 3,/4 bat.hs above grade �:► M 1/2 baths mbover qr arle U &A-4e nw-W. F i ri: ate t nq t 7011 Walkcwt PAvotment r.+t.tngt fr MART ET DA 1 A Salt- Amount ... t Sale Date.... 87(121 Effective Front. Footage!... Effective */FF1 POver: REJ5A LXTRA'at Porch 417.�1a Gl a-- e#dt Screen Porch Open F'ar c h t a" Dec k: t Mari Floor Firepl4c_e Ratinqt Lent r ,+1 Ai r t las�a?meent F F' itat i rag t RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 780 NURIH ARM DRIVE 380611723430010 CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka North Arm PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LAND: Lard Arc A: 62 bl►-) SU1L..DINU Year E41.11 1 t : 19 '�, Story Heitiht: 14,', rr raund Floor Ar vat 1 4! B Gra%,f� HtJi l di nq Ar$-a: 14 /8 2 car t�HrHctr� III a+ bedroom-, &h,.,vta qr adot 4 4t4i 1 Rothe, rabove s1rodr± I N 3/4 1,at h+s above tlradw lJ N 1 /s haAt hs wbove qr-4ds- Baseme.nt F i n i sh i t trl : WatI Vout. Ha%em-nt r',#t i nqt Is toCor►t r ar 1 Air: 1 MARKET DATA �7n1 a Amot_;nt ... : Salo! Datf?...: H/()4 Ef,ltertivv Frant. Frootaye... E#fe(tive *'IFF: H,+yffrt RAV/UANLSUN F � I RFAS: porrh 9ize%l L7l ^xff d: Fcrtren Port h Opt:-r► Pur c h: I)vk: k t IJQ Math Hlt:x)r, Fireplace Hating: b V.A%emvnt Up, hat t nqt RESIDENTIPI.. SALES DATA 669 M I NNE 1 ONKA HIGHLAND LA► lE: 7AO611723444) ►07 C I 'T Y OF ORONO Minnetonka Nor t h Arm PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LANDt L,,wJ Area,t 4()!�►►7 Bl1ILDINO YRar Bu i l t t 19 7 3 Story Hex9htt 140 Ground Floor Area- 1973 Cross 4ui l di r►y Arc a: 1973 car- gar ayt, N of bedrooms above yr :, M full baths above ura• t A 3/4 baths above grade w 1/2 both* above grade 1 bosedwn t F i r► i «t i nc; s 9r ► Mal kCXAt bas,. ► at A nd: a, MARKET DATA Sale Amount ... t 27500() Sale Date...: 87()k Effective Front Footage... El �_ive S/FFt Nuy"rt H1MPHREY E NTRASt Porch Sizest 61. a., dt Screen Porch Upon ►-'or c h t Domt i. t 564 Main Floor Fireplace Ratinclt 5 10 Centro! ^• • * FP k:.t i nqt 5 E 0 RESiDENTIAL_ SALES DATA 675 MINNETONKA HIGHLAND LANE 390611723440008 C_ I T Y OF ORONO Mi nnetcuika Nor t h Ar m PROPERTY DESCHIFTION LANDt Land Are°att 4800., 8il 1 L D I N6 Year Ehii 1 t t 19-7!+ 9teary Heights 104) Ormind F 1 uor Area: _i4LOB Groos butltltn-j Ar►aat 3.498 car uarwgea N of bedrovto% &U jvv gr ad 3t 4 M full bath% 49ove yrade ' M 3/4 baths ,,borer (jrode i M 112 h^ths '­vv qr wde 1 Basement. Fini &hivigt 09.1% Walkout Baseskrit r at t ntl t .4 MARKET DA1 A f:wla Amount ...t 373000 Sala. Date... t 8704 UJ<ertive Fr-+nt Footage... Fffective S/FFt Ftuyer t NEI-SON E % i RAS t P tri h Sit"st til'-Axedt f7,crperl :-'Dt ch t ►1,t-ro Pur ch t Dort: k : y20 M*tn Flcacu Fireplace kat:ngt a IDCs4ot; ai Airt ,t 044%vgw-vt t v Rat ir." 4 0 QW` k1ra I DEN. i Nl -i1-t -Lb DA T A 4070 DAHL kD :58071 17231 10019 CITY UE UkONU Minnetonka Nor 4 h E- PRUFE k i Y UESI,R I P 1- I UN L AND a Land Areee 44t:;i►(.) Year bui1t1 1973 Etrw, , Hetcht1 100 bro.owd Floor, "r i-i+a Or-nyy Hu i l d i ng r 4r ear 1 1 E3•.'•a c or ct..r Ate,. 4 rat hrmdrol,ms at►t�. w �,lr .ed4i; �• it ftol l heof sticiv@ tare -de 1 M .5i 4 hAtt-� ,st#tave qr �1t1er 1 M 1 .` teat t.�. at►tiver tar• ,• 1 Fla'ew+�rr1 t F i n i rt► t 1 t<� 1 . Walkout i.t soment ratincfl ( t.r,f r -t1 0'11 r- t MARKET DATA Sit l to Amount ... a li �Zt�r►q Sale V • ... 1 137C►4 to j..ct1 Frtr ootage... Etfr�tivetr i.-i . •.•v�r k�ltF;F.NHl.ftk t ; '. tr►a51 p'orc'1' `�, zotsI 1ila'-•* ;t `-�-cI relll F"cwcl Opera F'trrehr ?._ Derck : j_Y& M.+tn F'!c>+w Fareptac.N i�at•: Y 14N`'4R"v&f0 1 f' k.,it 1'1Q1 4 r 1 1 RESIDENTIAL S"LES DATA II 389E CHERRY AVE .380811723330085 19 g CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka North Arm • PROPERTY DESCRIPTION MARKET DATA LANDi Land Areas 20000 Sale Am.nant... 1 257000 Sale Date ... 1 8701 Effective Front FLI,Aage... BU I L.D INO Year Builts 1945 Effective a/FFs Story !Nights 100 Ground Floor Areas 1507 Buyers FELDMAN Gross Building Areas 1507 1 car garage a of bedrooms above grades 3 M full baths above grade 1 EXTRAS, B 3/4 baths above grade 0 Porch Si:ess e 1/2 baths above grade 1 Clawed, Screen Porch Basement Finishings 0% (Open Porchs Decks 300 Walkout Basement ratings 0 Main F1 nor Fireplace Ratings 5 Central Airs I Fws.emrnt FP Ratings r• 00 RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 2693 SHACYWOOD RD 382111723240033 CITY OF ORONO North Arm PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LANDS Land Areas BUILDING Year Suilts 1949 Story Heights 100 Ground Floor Area: 1672 Gross Building Areas 1672 3 car garagw If of bedrooms above grades O e full baths above grade 0 e 3/4 baths above qradw 0 e 112 bath% Abovw grodl O Basement Finishing1 Ox Walkout Basement ratsngl 4 Central Air1 I MARKET DATA Sale Amount ... s 179000 Sale Date...3 8703 Effective Front Footage... Effective a/FF1 Buyers ROSIDEAU/HUNGATE ELTRAbs Porch Sixess Glaxwds Strewn Porch Upon Furch, Dec k1 357 Main Floor Fireplace Rating, basement FP Rating, (9 (• I 0 RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 2655 NORTH SHORE DRIVE 3B09t1723420001 CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka Access - Smiths PROPERTY DESCRIPTION L.ANDs Land Areas 71000 BUILDINB Year Builtt 1920 Story Heights 150 Ground Floor Areas 2463 Brow Building Areas 3075 3 car garage M of bedrooms above grades 4 M full bathe above grade 3 N 3/4 bath■ above grade 0 M 1/2 baths above grade 0 Basement Finishings 00% Walkout Basement ratings 0 Central Airs MARKET DATA Sale AT011nt...1 490000 Sale Date...3 8708 Effective Front Footage... Effective f/FF, Buyers LACY E%TRASt Porch Stzess Bl azeds Screen Porch Open F'orchi 374 Decks 969 Main Floor Fireplace Rating, 5 lasement FP Ratings i• • RESIDENTIAL SALE3 DATA 1025 HERITAGE LANE 381011723130009 CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka Access - Smiths PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LANDS Land Area# O BUILDING Year Builts 1972 Story Heights 2UO Ground Floor Areas 1196 Gross Bulldsrg Arsa# 2368 3 car garage N of bedroom, above grades 0 N full baths above grade 0 N 3/4 baths above grade O Y t/2 baths above grade 0 Basseant Fsnishings 0% Walkout Basement ratings b MARKET DATA Sale Amount...# 250000 '3ale Date...9 B702 Effective Front Footage... Effective f/FFe Buyers JOHNSON EXTRAS& Porch Stzes# Glazed, Screen Porch 215 Upen Porch# Deck# 430 Main Floor Fireplace Ratings • Centrel Airy t Rasement FF' RAt#ngs i* v RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 1930 SHORELINE 301011723420005 CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka Smiths Bay PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LANDS Land Areas 97440 BUILDING Year Builts 1954 Story Heights 100 Ground Floor Areas 1768 Gross Building Areas 1760 2 car garage 0 of bedrooms above grades 3 M full baths above grade 2 N 3/4 baths above grade 0 M 1/2 baths .,bove grade O Basement Finiehings :0% Walkout Basement rat,ngt .� Central Airs I MARKET DATA Sale Amount..., 173000 Sale Date...: 8705 Effective Front Footage... Effective f/F'Ft Buyers STIERNA ERTRASs Porch Siresi Gla¢edt 196 Screen Porch Dpen Porcht Decks Main Floor Fireplace Ratings 5 Basement FP Rating, 5 10 W1 RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 3905 SHORELINE DRIVE 382011723220003 CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka Spring Park Day PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LANDS Land Areas 2500 BUILDING Year Built: 1920 Story Heights 100 Ground Floor Areas 946 Gross Buildinq Areas 946 1 car garaye M of hsdrooms above grades 0 N full baths above grade M 3/4 baths above gradn V N 1/2 baths ahuve grwdv u Baseman! .% Nalkwt 84'emkDt rats",]: 11 MARKET DATA Sale Amount ... 1 77000 Sale Date...s 8704 Effective Front FDDtage... Effective $/FFs Buyers SCHIEBEL L X IRAE.: Purch sites: G'l weds Screen Porch tlpen Porehs Der.ks Main Flour Fireplace Ratings 0 Centrel Asps . Easement FP Ratings ME A RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 3915 SHORELINF AVE 382011723220005 CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka Spring Park Bay PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LAND, Land Areas 2250 BUILDING Year Builts 1920 Rtory Heights t00 Ground Flour Area, 576 Gross Building Area, 576 car garage 0 of bedrooms Above grade, 0 0 full bathe above nradp o 0 3/4 baths above grate 0 112 bathe Above grado Basement F'inish,n',t Wal kout Basement , nl uw: Lentr..l A:r: MARKET DATA Sale Amnur.t...t 40000 Sale Date..., 9705 Lffertive Front Footage... E44ect.ive $/FFt Buyers CONTRERAS E LIRAS: h Si less d, Screen Porch Porchs Deck, h.. Floor Fireplace Rating, bars.-mr,,t FP Rating: • RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 2525 DUNWOODY AVE .382011723220018 CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka Spring Park Bay PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LANDS Land Areal 39375 BUILDING Year Builts 1925 Story Heights 200 Ground Floor Areas 1209 Grove Susidlnq Areas 21h2 2 car garage • of bedre m, above grades 4 v full baths above grade 1 N 3/4 bathe above grade 2 N 1/2 baths above Iradv 0 Basement Finishings 50% Malkout Basement rating: O MARKET DATA Sale Amnunt... 1 320000 Sale Veto...1 8702 Effective Front Footage... Effective S/FFs Buyers LEAR EX IRAS$ Porch Sizevl Gl"eds 495 Screen Parch ❑Pen 11orchs Decks 750 Main Floor Fireplace Ratings 5 I* CmAral Ain 2 basvmant FP Ratings 0 ,40 RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 2695 CASCO POINT RD 302011723230003 CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka Spring Perk Nay PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LANDi Land Areai 2040U BUILDING Year Built, 1906 Story Height, 200 Ground Flow Area, 1212 Gross BmIdinq Area, 2019 2 car qar=,qe e of bedroom, above grade, 2 e full baths above grade e 3i4 baths angve grade v e 1/2 baths ab,rve grerM 1 Beeement Finishing, .. Walkout Basement rating, Central An r MARKET DATA Sale Amount..., 28050O Sale DatP...l 8706 Effective Front Fuatage... Effective f/FF, Buyeri LEE E KTRA81 Porch Siz rl 1.91 az nd, Screen Porch Open Pesch, 82 Deck, 406 Main Flow Fireplace Ratingf 4 R.iP.bnt FP Rating, .• RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 279t, LASED POINT RD 382011723230011 CITY OF ORONO "n nnetonka Spring Park. Bay PROPERTY DESCRIPIWN LANDS Land Areas O BUILDING Year guilts 1910 Story H*ights 200 Ground Floor Areas 1480 Gross Building Area, 2430 2 car goroge N of bedrooms above grades O M full both* abnve prods O • 314 baths above tirade u N 1/2 bath" shove grade 0 Sasament Finishinq: 0% walkout basement ratings i MARKET DATA Sale Amount ... t 220000 Sale Date...1 8703 Effective Front Footage... Effective !/FFi Buyers PALMER EXTRA,,, Porch Si<est GlazPds Scree, "arch Open Porch, Decks 250 Main Floor Fireplace Ratings 00 Central Air, 2 Uaeeoent FV Ratsngt LAKESHORE SALES EXCHANGE ADDRESS 2879 Casco Pt Rd PID / 90 117 99 41 MU, CITY Or... LAKE Mika- Spring Park Bay PROPERTY DESCRIPTION m Total Land Area 26000 Topography alight clone Shoreline rood Name of Bay SprinNnv Minns conks Only) BUILDING: Year Built 1%3 Story Height Split entry Ground Floor Arm till Cross Building Area 1111 Gang@ Sq. Pt. 487 City Services: (S@ser)4ea (Wacar EXTRAS: Fireplace 2 Porch (Sq.Ft.)_j(Xj a ft an Baths (sire) I lull 111L Finished Baswas, nt (Z) 7t1: Central A.C. no Walkout #3 COMMENTS �3r MARKET DATA Sale Amount. . . . . . . B 248,000 Sale Date. 19_ 19R7 Effe_tive Front Footage 90 Ind.cated Lake Value/F.F. (Sa'.a amt. - ENV Bldg. } Eff.F.F. - ILV/FF) ASSESSOR'S VALUATIQM Total Valuation for 1?88 �,Q _ ENV for Buildings__ 9nyt1 ENV for Land _12. AOO Inforuation Source: Assessor Record, Submitted BY: Rolf Erickson Date:_ 4-16-MM CA r] 1D RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 2807 ❑ASCO FO1N1 RD -7,82011723320U14 CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka Spring Park bay PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LANDt land Area, 26400 bllll DINO Yo., Au,ltl 1915 £tory Height) 200 Ground Floor AreAi 190'1 Gross building Areal '3'.98 2 car qar age N of bedre,c.% above .1,.,de: N full bathe 41)0" 91.dl I • 3/4 baths above grade o 4 1/2 bathe wbov:• o, ed, I basement Flnlvhw": e". W41 knot basement r+l-nn: Central At, 1 1 MARKET DATA Sale Amount...) 288000 SaIv Date...: 8703 Effective Front Fr -tape... Fffentive f/FFI buyer MUTTERER EX IRA41 Porch S,vvst Blazed. Srraen Porch I ip,n• Purchl 382 Deck, 200 N.IIn Fiuo, i,replace Ratinq, 5 1'..'r."it fP Net, ngl i fe KI RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 690 TONKAWA RD 350511723330012 C17V OF DRONO Minnetonia Stobbs Say PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LANDS Land Areas 165ou BNILDINO Year Guilts 1957 Story Weights lU0 Brglind Floor Areas 10716 .J Oros% Building Areas 1U56 car garage e of bedrooms above grades u N full baths above grade ri e '/Y bathe above grade 0 a 1/7 haths rbnvn qr Cie r Rawement Finishing: "% Wallunl Ha%wmenl ratings 6 MARKET DATA 5x10 Amoint... 1 120900 Sala Date...1 5704 Effective Front Fuotage... Effective t/FFs Buyers OI FSKV EtIRhSs Por h Sizeas Cl azedl Screen Porch OP., Pur ch s rl k 2 294 Mail Flom Flrssplace Ratings 6 0 Lrntr.J iklri 1 Rneement TP Rattngl v RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 875 Partenwood Lane 300511723340013 CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka Stubbs Day PROPERTY OFSCRIFIION L AND, Land Aran, 0 BUILDINU Year Puilti 1984 story Height: IVO Ground Fluor Areat 3/96 Gross Buildinq Areal 3796 3 car garage e of bodruases above grade, 1 e full baths above grade I e 3/4 baths abov grade O Y 1/1 hathe abovr grade 1 leeent Finishingi .0.1% M..Ikout Haserxent r..t ,nq, 4 MARKET DATA Sale Aaount... i 7750(K) Sale Date...3 8707 Effe,tive Front Footage... Ettective S rFl Huyerl MCEIt vey EXIRAS, Porch Sue,, GiazeJ, 25� sareer� Porch iger. Pwthl Deck, 5" Main Floor Fireplace Ratingl 2 Ceofr al Al,I 1 lasee►nt Ft, Rat tnel 5 � (9 0 RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 1995 UREEN TREES RD 58111172323OW2 C11Y OF ORONO Minnetonka Tanager PROPERTY DESCRIF•TION LAND* Land Areal 0 BUIL. DINO Year Bulltl 1901 Story heights 100 W cawnd Floor Areas 2916 Oros% Building Areas 4916 3 car garage B of bedroom% above grader ; e full bath% above grade e 3/♦ bath% above grade 1 e 1/2 bath% abovm grade 1 Bases t Fuu%t.u.gs FKx Walkout bameaant ratsnyt Central Asrs 1 MAkkET DATA Sale Amount ... r C4�SbiQ.] Sale Date...a 8/05 Effective Front Footage... Effective f/FFt buyers WAVIER E%TRA3r Porch sizes, Ulazeds 18'! Screen Porch t yrrn Porch* aB Deckl 330 Morn Flrrar Fireplace Ratings 1 Nwtienrrent ! P kat sngs W] RESIDENTIAL SALES UATA 1340 REST POINT CIRCLE 38071172331002.3 CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka Weft Arm PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LANDS Land Area: 14000 BUILDING Year Built, 1990 Story Height, 129 Ground Floor Arent 10U8 Oro%a Building Weds 1151 1 car g.r..gv • of bedrnrtee above grade, 3 • full bath• above grade 1 0 3/4 both% above grade I • 1/2 both% wtm vw grade 0 Waaeeagt Fini%hingt 0% Walkout Basement ratingt 0 Central All, 2 MARKET DATA Selo Amount..., 112750 Sale Dot"...: 8703 Effective Front Footage... Effective t/FF, buyers HAW INSIN E%TRAb, Porch SAID., Bl a:ed, Screen Porch UP." Porchl Deck, Main Floor Fireplace Ratingt Pm, m t FP Ratings u L RESIDENTIAL BALES DATA 1350 REST P01NT CIRCLE 380711723310024 CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka West ARm PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LANDS Land Areal 14000 BU II.DINC Year Builts 1972 Story Heightt IVV Ground Floor Areal 1:48 Gross Building Areas 1248 2 car garage e of bedroom, above also,, e full bertha wbt,ve grad, 1 • 3/4 baths above grade 1 N 1/2 baths above grade n Vmsewent Finishing, 80A walkout Basement ratings n Central Airs 1 MARKET DATA Sale Amount..., 177450 Sale Date.... 8703 Effective Front Footage... Effective t/FFi Buyer, ANFIN60N EUTkA61 Porch Si zoos Dlu,ds Screen Porch Olsen Porchs 96 Dec kt 376 Main Floor Fireplace Ratings 11nssnient F'F' Ratings 6 :7 • Ito RESIDENTIAL W,—ES DATA 1380 REST PCINT RD 36071I723330007 LITv 1R1H0 Minna West., n PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LAND, Land Area, I8P.00 BUIL.DINS Year Built, 1920 Stay Height, 20n Ground FIour Ar ea1 930 Grass Buildinq Ar+a, I860 1 car garage * of bedrooms above Vrade, N full baths above grade • 3/4 baths shu+e grade • 1/2 baths above grada 1 Basam t Fim shinq, Cw-2 Walkout Basement rrttnq, Central Atrl 2 MARKET DATA Bale Amount...1 145000 Bale Date..., 8703 Effective Front Footage... Effective f/FF, Buyer: KHAKE/VALIGHN F r TRNS, Porch Sisest lilaaced, 29 Screen F'or Ui 01-c•n 1'urchi 3a0 Deck, Ma,n FlowFireplace Rating, Hasement FP Rating, I0 110 I 0 RESIDENTIAL BALES DATA 4081 HOGHWOOD RD 380711723440076 CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka West Arm PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LANDs Land Arena 0 BUILDING Year Btu l t I 190 Story Heights 100 Ground Floor Area 2343 Grows Building Areas 2343 3 car gerrge N of bedrooms above grade, O M full baths &hove grade u M 3/4 baths above grade 0 4 1/2 bath% above yrade O Basement Finishing, i'ik Walkout Basement ratings O Central Airs 1 MAP.KET DATA Sale Amount ... a 255000 Sale Date...a 8611 Effective Front Footage... Effective f/FFs Buyers VONGPIEG t NIPASI Porch Sizes, Gls.z..ds 294 Screen Porch Llpen Pnrchs Decks 704 Main Floor Fireplace Ratings Ha%emxnt FP Ratings 17 RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 1931 FASERNESS POINT :SRISl172lSI40009 CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka West Arm PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LAND: Land Areas BUILDING Year Builts 19.`,O Story Heights 11.10 Ground F1nor Areas [961 Gross Building Areal 2961 2 i or n..r age 4 of bedroom% above gredel 2 0 full baths above grade I 0 3/4 baths above grade 0 e 1/2 baths above ,,.de 1 Basement Flnlshings Sn>. Waltnut Basement ratings b MARbET DATA Sale Amuunt...1 225000 :ale D,.F a...s 870t Fffecsrvc+ Front Footage... Effective 4/FFs kkiyrers CHRISTIANSEN L%1BAt,i F'urr.h 91zes1 +1 a. eds Screen Porch 252 lip en Fnrchs Decks 432 Maln Flnur Fireplace Ratings 3 0 1 eut. At As. s 1 ha5.,men1 FP Ratings 7 0 RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 1955 FAGERNESS POINT RD 381811723140010 CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka West Arm PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LAND& Land Areas BUILDING Year Builts 1951 Story Height& 100 Ground Flnm Areas 1376 Gross Building Areas 1376 2 car garage • of bedrooms above grades 2 e full baths above grade 1 e 3/4 baths above grade O 4 1/2 baths above grade O Basement Finishing& W% Walkout Basement ratings O MARKET DATA 01a tiear�T-rw Qoe" I New Eid�SC Bale Amount...1 125150 Sale Date...1 8703 Effective Front Footage... Effective 4/FFs Buyers GEMPLER/IVES FXTRASs Porch SiXass Blazed, Screen Porch Open Porchs Decks Main Floor Fireplace Ratings 4 10 Central Airs 2 Basement FP Ratings 0 WE PESIDEN IIAL ;TALES DATA 1951 CONCORDIA ST 381811723140011 CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka West Arm PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LANDe Land Areal BUILDING Year Bullts 1950 Story Height: 100 Ground Floor Areal 1590 Gross Building Area: 1590 car garage e of bedrooms above trades N full baths ab:." grade 1 N 3/4 bathe above graae 0 M 1/2 baths above grade I Basement FLnshings [try, Walkout Basement ratu,.Ts o 1'rs.tr al Atr: . MARk.ET DATA Sale Amount...s 140350 Sale Date...8 8702 Effective Front Footage... Effective t/Fit Buyer: WALDRON E X TRAS a Porch Si:ess Glaaeds Screen Porch Open POrlht Decks Mat,, Floor Fireplace Ratites 5 Fnsemenl FF• Ratings 5 ►-1 U 0 RESIDENTIAL SALES DATA 1935 CONCORDIA ST 38181172314OC123 CITY OF ORONO Minnetonka West Arm PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LANDS Land Areas BUILDING Year Builts 1954 Story Heights 125 erntind Floor Areas 1233 Dross Building Areas 1469 2 car garage • of bedrooms above grades 3 • full baths above braise I 0 3/4 baths above grade U 4 1/2 baths above grade O Basement Finish:ngs 00% Walk:wt Basement ratings O Central Alit 2 MARk'.ET DATA Sale Amount ... 1 125000 Sale Date...1 8702 Effectsve Front Footage... E44ar Five S/FFs Foyer: LYTLE fkIRASs Porch Bites, Ulaaads Screen Porch OPen Porch, Decks Main Floor Fireplace Ratings 6 isavreent FP Ratings cl�3 0UNCN_ mq rING To$ Mark E. Bernhardson, city Administrator PP^ 2 519c9 Prue John R. Gerhardson, Public works Director OF t�R'JNO Dates April 18, 1988 Subjects Removal of weight Restrictions Due to moderate temperatures and abnormally low moisture during the spring of 1988, it is not necessary to restrict axle weight restrictions beyond April 26, 1988. Recommendations To remove the axle weight restrictions on city streets, effective April 26, 1988. Proposed motion Moved Second to remove the axle weight rest on Mt—yitreets,--eTf—ec-tive April 26, 1988. TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Ben hardson, City Administrato 1 Forwarded recommending approval. 1, 41588.10 ON C011kc►i M" UING TO: Mayor and City Council ".PP, 2519E9 nm Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato DATES April 15, 198a�1iY OF SU0JWT: Willow/Highway 12 Signalizatlon Attachment: A. Draft Resolution Regarding Signalization at Willow and Highway 12 B. Willow/Highway 12 signalization Memo Dated 8/20/86 C. Willow Drive Traffic Control 8/5/87 ISSUE - Determination as to whether the Council wants to submit anotfier resolution regarding this matter. INTRODUCTION - The City of Orono together with the City of Long Leese In f986 has submitted a request for signalization at the Intersection of Willow and 12. As noted at the Council-s meeting of August 10, 1987, the State indicated that the intersection did not meet the appropriate warrants for installation of a signal. In order to keep the issue alive the City has been advised that it may be appropriate to submit another resolution to indicate Its ongoing interest in this matter. City staff will also be requesting that Long Lake submit a similar petition on the matter together with possible requests from th? Cities of Medina, Maple Plain and Independence. A_L_T_E_R_N_A_T_I_VES_ - 1. Adopted as presented. 2. Amend and adopt. 1. Table. 4. Choose to take no action. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council adopt the attached riiofutIon encouraging the MnDOT staff to install a temporary traffic signal at Willow and 12 to be followed by a permanent signal and that it forgo the installation of the warning flasher for an estimated price of $S,s00.00. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the Council adopt Resolution No, encouraging The Department of Transportation to install a an signal at the intersection of Willow and 12 and to forgo the installation of a flashing signal for a cost of $5,006,90, Ayes _., Mays _ cc: City of Long Lake City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ys NO. A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE CITIES OF ORONO AND LONG [ARE DECLARING THE NEED FOR IMPROVED HIGHWAY TRAFFIC REGULATION ALONG PORTIONS OF O.S. TRUNK HIGHWAY 12 WHEREAS, the Cities of Orono and Long lake are concerned with the health, safety and welfare of their citizens; and WHEREAS, U.S. Trunk Highway 12 in a major arterial highway which, daily, carries 15,000 to 17,000 cars through portions of both cities from the area of Lindawood Lane (on the east) to County Road 6 (on the west); and WHEREAS, the City of Long Lake has in recent years experienced substantial residential, commercial and Industrial development along U.S. Trunk Highway 12 and will continue to experience more In the near future, which development has and will impact heavily upon the trsfflc upon said highway; and WHRRRAS, The City of Orono is presently undergoing a comprehensive study which may .esult in changing the zoning and land use structure of approximately 600 scree of land along U.S. Trunk Highway 12 from low density single family residential to a mixture of medium density residential, commercial and light industrial uses (said study heing knows as the -Highway 12 Corridor Study), and WHEREAS, the cities are concerned with the safe and reasonable traffic flows within their jurisdictional limits due to serious and dangerous flaws in traffic regulation along U.S. Truck Highway 12, such as the lack of a semaphore at Its intersection with Willow Drive; RUN. TMMErM, BE IT RZSMVND. that the City Council of Orono and Long Lake declare that there is a need for increased traffic regulation, reduced speed and increased levels of caution along U.S. Trunk Highway 12 from Lindawood Lane to County Road 6, east and west. BE IT FORTEER RE8O4VND, that Highway 12 and WillowDrive Is declared a dangerous intersection in need of a permanent semaphore. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution be delivered to the Minnesota Department of Transportation for the purpose of completing a study of the traffic problems along said portion of U.S. Highway 12 and implementation of new regulations and controls to improve the safet- of traffic within the jurisdictional limits of each city. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held April 25, 1988. ______________ J amee R. Grabek, Mayo[ ATTEST: DotaFy M.-tiaLlln,ZrTiy er Adopted by the City Council of Long Lake, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held . 1988. Owin Sme y—�,—Mayor—___ _ ATTESTS LUVe[ne Nanson, Clty Cler 82086.6 TO: Mayor and City Council -1p^ FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Adminletratoe, DATE: August 22, 1986 SUBJECT: Highway 12/Willow - Joint Resolution As you will recall, at the May 12, 1986 meeting, the Council passed a Resolution, copy of which is attached, requesting that the Minnesotat Department of Ttansporation study the feasibility of safety improvement at Willow specifically installation of a semaphore. After further discussion with :.ong Lake, they would like to expand it to review by MNDOT of the entire leg of Highway 12 from Lindswood on the east to County Road 6. RECOMMENDATION - Staff would recommend that the revised reeofut7on be passed to encourage the Minnesota Department of Transportation to t..ke a more definitive look at Highway 12 and safety improvements and upgrades. This is based in part on the work the city has done in conjunction with the Highway 12 Corridor study. it is felt their study at this point would be helpful in improving the traffic situation in the area, one of the City's goals in the study. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by , to ratify the joint resolution with Long Lake_regarding Highway 12. Ayes _ Nays _ City of 011-IONO JRESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1992 A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE INTERSECTION OF WILLOW DRIVE AND STATE HIGHWAY 12 AS A DANGEROUS INTERSECTION WHEREAS, the Orono City Council is concerned with the safety, health and welfare of the citizens of Orono; and WHEREAS, the Orono City Council is concerned with the safe and reasonable traffic flow in the City; and WHEREAS, a recent traffic fatality at the intersection of Willow Drive and State Highway 12 has prompted a study of the traffic patterns of that intersection and area; and WHEREAS, the study has determined that consideration of the installation of a traffic semaphore at that intersection should be given priority. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, t'vpt the Orono City Council does declare that the intersection of ;Willow Drive and State Highway 12 is a dangerous intersection and that the Minnesota Department of Transportation place this intersection on a priority for the installation of a permanent traffic semaphore. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held May 12, 1986, ,\N\ii L"ac-" Mary C. t er, Mayor ATT T, ,thy. . He C ty—( C ar A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE CITIES OF ORONO AND LONG LAKE DECLARING THE NEED FOR �f°(' F P W E n� IMPROVED HIGHWAY TRAFFIC REGULAT11N ALONG �- PORTIONS OF U.S. TRUNK HIGHWAY 12 r ( WHEREAS, the Cities of Orono and Long Lake are concerned ith the fie",— - -J safety and welfare of their citizens; and WHEREAS, U.S. Trunk Highway 12 is a major arterial highway which, daily, carries 15,000 to 17,000 cars through portions of both cities from the area of !,indawood Lane (on the east) to County Road 6 (on the west); and WHEREAS, the City of Long Lake has in recent years experienced substantial residential, commercial and industrial development along U.S. Trunk Highway 12 and will continue to experience more in the near future, wh vvelopoent has and will impact heavily upon the traffic upon said highwa WHEREAS, the City of Orono is presently undergoing a Wnpr, ensive study which may result in changing the zoning and land use structure of approximately 600 acres of land along U.S. Trunk Highway 12 from low density single family residential to a mixture of medium density residential, commercial and light industrial uses (said study being known as the "Highway 12 Corridor Study"); and WHEREAS, the cities are concerned with the safe and reasonable traffic flows within their jurisdictional limits due to serious and dangerous flaws in traffic regulation along U.S. Trunk Highway 12, such as the lack of a semaphore at its intersection with Willow Drive; NOW, THEREFORE, BE RESOLVED, that the City Council of Orono and Long Lake declare that there is a - , for increased traffic regulation, reduced speed and increased levels of cauti... along U.S. Trunk Highway 12 from Lioidawood Lane to County Road 6, east and west, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Highway 12 and Willow Drive is declared a dangerous intersection in need of a permanent semaphore. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution be delivered to the Minnesota Department of Transportation for the purpose of completing a study of the traffic problems along said portion of :.S. Highway 12 and implementation of new regulations and controls to improve the safety of traffic within the jurisdictional limits of each city. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held _August 25 , 1986. ATTEST, Dorothy M. He in, City Clerk Tim Adams, Acting Mayor Adopted by the City Council of Long Lake, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held , 1986. unze Mayor Attest: u erne Hanson City Clerk To: Mayor Crabek and Orono Council Members From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Date: August 5, 1987 Subject: Willow Drive - Highway 12, Traffic Control . .. .. ,q] 10 Iz87 Attachment: A - Wairaat Requirements 6 Comments - Willow Drive/Highway 12 Analysis ISSUE - Information to the Council regarding the current status of installs of a signal at Highway 12 and willow Drive. INTRODUr-!O_; - At the July 13th, 1987 meeting, the Council discussed the propo: 'ounty Road 116 extension from Medina across Willow Drive to Highwa, The issue regarding the traffic control at Willow Drive and Highway 12 was raised. Consequently, staff has reviewed with the Department of Transportation, District 5 headquarters in Golden Valley, the current status of that intersection as it relates to traffic warrants (please see Attachment A), and generally, the subject of what it takes to have installation regarding a traffic signal on a State -aid highway. DISCUSSION - As noted above, the intersection at present does not meet any of the warrants for a installation of a signal at that location. The ones most likely to be achieved are as follows: 1. Minimum vehicular volume; 2. Interruption warrant; 3. Minimum pedestrian volume; 0. Accident. The primary problem is that the volume of traffic from Willow Drive across Highway 12 does not reach the minimum. This is needed even for the accident warrant. For warrant 12, it must meet 53 cars per hour from either the north or the south leg (i.e. Willow Drive) during at least 8 hours a day. The most recent survey from February 1987 only meets it on either leg for 3 hours. It is the policy of both the State and Federal Government that there will be no permission to install any lights on any trunk highways which do not meet the warrants for a signal. This is in part due to the fact that signalised intersections can have more accidents than non -signalised intersections when drivers perceive little reason for the signal. Once an intersection does meet the warrants, it is placed on a priority list, which for District 5 includes about 45 projects. As the District generally only has enough money to fund 12 signals a year, it may be at least 3 to 4 years before projects towards the bcttom of the priority list are funded. It may actually take longer if new ., ral installations of a higher priority are inserted in the priority in subsequent years. once it has met warrants, however, and if it low 5f the funding is not going to be in the near term based on the prior he City can go ahead and fund installation of such a project on its own with permission from MnOot. The approximate installation costs of the 3 alternatives are as follows: Willow Drive and Highway 12 Intersection August 5, 1987 Page 2 of 3 8 45,000 Temporary 4-way control signals 80,000 Permanent signals Up to 250,000 Intersection control, including raised islands for channelization foe traffic (right a left turn lanes). This would be somewhat less if channelization can be achieved through striping with a little widening of the actual road surface. The funding arrangements vary by the type of installation, needs of the intersection, etc. There are at least four (4) possible arrangements for funding that may come into play at this intersection. A. Installation in Advance of Prior it Fundin - Should the City deci� go a eTi wand have the light inste led in advance of it reaching the appropriate point on the priority list of funding, the City would have to bear the entire coat and as such the project would be removed from the priority list with no possibility for re- imbursement. B. Normal Trunk Funding - If it reaches a priority on the list to be funded t could be unded at the normal course of events, the arrangement is generally 50-50 with the State paying 50% and the City and/or Cities funding the balance. C. Federal Primer Route Fundin - If this would meet the criteria for pr mart' route, t e Federe Government could fund up to 70% with the balance being split between the State and the City(s) on an even share basis. 151 for the State and 151 for the City(s). D. Federal High Hazard Location - If it met the criteria s Federar -hazard location, once the normal criteria and funding F .ity were met the Federal Government may fund up to 90t of cost. Criteria are on a cost ratio of the annualized accident history at that location versus the cost of the installation of the improvement. E. Re lacement Pundin - If a temporary light were installed, either on e m xtura o and ng or on City funding alone, the signal would then be possibly placed on a replacement fund and in 5 to 10 years may be replaced with a permanent light with one of the funding arrangements listed above. In addition to the capital costs, the State does have maintenance costs for control signals that it would take on with the City taking on maintenance costs of relar,pino, painting, etc. RECOMMENDATION - At this point staff will be further exploring what it can done —to aselst in the intersection meeting a warrant, and absent that, work to have installation of a flashing light installed at that location. Actions may include further Willow Drive spot checks to see if the minimum volume can be met, and if there may be other warrants achievable. Willow Drive and Highway 12 Intersection August 5, 1987 Page 3 of 3 PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by , seconded by , to accept staff's information regarding to wintersection tionmeeting waday f2, an rants. Ayes staffdirect to continue efforts assist inthe nays __ cc: City of Long Lake City of Medina Glenn Cook, City Engineer An investigation of the need for traffic signal control should include where applicable, at least an analysis of the factors contained in the following warrants: Warrant I —Minimum vehicular volume. Warrant 3—Interruption of continuous traffic. Warrant J—Minimum pedestrian volume. Warrant a —School crossings. W., rant 5—Progressive movement. Warrant 6—Accident experience. Warrant 7—Systcros. Warrant 8—Combination of warrants. W'arranl 9—Four Hour Volumes. W arrant 10—Peak Hour Delay. Warrant I I —Peak Hour Volume. aC-5 Warrant 1, Miaimum Vebicular Volume The Mmimum Vehicular Volume warrant is intended for application where the volume of intersming traffic is the principal reason for consideration of signal installation. The warrant is satisfied when, for each of any 8 hours of an average day, the traffic volumes given in the table below exist on the major street and on the highs -volume minor - street approach to the intersection. An "average" day is defined as a weekday representing traffic volumes normally and repeatedly found at the location. MINIMUM VF'.MIUUI.An VOLUMES FOR WARRANT I VcArcle. Rr Fow m Nwntrcr of I.m. For monna toff Veaiclex Rr hourm AgrAe��.durae ran rare appro'rF mynr alrtN (441 of roc-rlrt�l atarn�F Maroc Suvvi K. ra—t EotF al+trcnarb) Imr.Iim[um wJy) I................ 1........ .......... ll a......... a .......... . ate. ... .... fare........ Ian 3w 1............. ,. a.arae...__. rm ar These major -street and minor -street volumes are for the same 8 hours. During those 8 hours, the direction of higher volume on the minor street may be on one approach during some hours and on the opposite approach during other hours. When the 85-percentile speed of major-steet traffic exceeds 40 mph in either an urban or a rural arm, or when the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000. the Minimum Vehicular Volume warrant is 70 percent of the requlremenrs above. w-u td Iv-" (d Rene ,4L S�fs 0.4-c_ I �v'�2 I�l}N lra� I�NI(ft �pq M u TCD) 4" Warro1 t lwr.gfr of Carf...r reggae The Interruption of Continuous Traffic warrant applies to operating conditions where the traffic volume on a major Firm is so hnvy, that traffic on a tastlor ogcrsecting street suffers raenuve delay or hazard in crr,amg or crossing the major street - The warrant is satisfied when, for o<h of any g hours of an average day, the traffic volumes given in the table hdow exist on me major street and on the higher -volume minor- streci approach to the intersection, and the signal installation will not ecriouely disrupt progressive traffic flow. MINIMUM VENICULAR VOLUNF FOR WARRANT Whew Mr hour Nwnaar f Iwe: rw m ..eat traR V,hii*. per dar.w h,gMr Ww.. .etGrYph nv,).v tlrtel l4.WW nv.µnTl waxw,ea ■aPr lilacs N,w..umt Irxh alTnutl�+l 4nr Airaat„w nNYt 7 S.waw._... I 9n 7.5 Sri_...... Yw......e m ❑n C}{a/ l0V9My TThesemajor-slrm and minor-strm volumes are for the same g hours. During those 8 hours, the direction of higher volume on the minor street may be on one approach during some hours and on the opposite approach during other hours. When the 85-perc.ntilc speed of major -street traffic exceeds 40 mph in either an urban or a rural area, or when the intersection lies within the builtup area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10.000. the Interruption of Continuous Traffic warrant is 70 percent of the requirements above. 4C-8 Warrial d, Minimum Pedestrian Volatile The Minimum Pedetrian Volume warrant is satisfied when, for each of any 8 hours of an average day. the following traffic volumes vise I On the major street. 600 or more vehicles per hour enter the mttrvection (total of both approachaf or where there is a raised median island a fccl ear more in width, 1.000 or more vehicles per hour (total of both apprwda) enter the intersection on the major street. and 2 During '.he same 8 hours as in paragraph (1) there are ISO or more pedestrians per hour on the highest volume crosswalk crossing the major street. R'hen the 115-percentile speed of nsajur-sum traffic exceeds 40 mph in other an urban of a rural area. or v. hen the intersection lies within tl.e hmlt up area of an isolated cm..aumly having a population of less than 10,000, the Minimum Pedestrian Volume warrant is 70 percent of the requirements above. A signal installed under this warrant at an isolated intersection should be of the traffic -actuated type with push buttons for pedestrians crossing the main street. If such a signal is Installed at an intersection within a signal system, it should be equipped and operated with control devices which provide proper coordination. - Signals installed according to this warrant shall be equipped with pedestrian indications conforming to requirements set forth in other sections of this Manual. Signals may be installed at nonintersection locations (mid -block) ,,rovided the requirements of this warrant arc met. and provided that the related crosswalk is not closer than 150 fin to another established crosswalk. Curbside parking should be prohibited for 100 fin in advance of and 20 fin beyond the crosswalk. Phasing, coordination, and installation must conform to standards set forth in this Manual. Special attention should be given to the signal head placement and the signs and markings used at noninicruction locations to be sure drivers are aware of this special application. 44C-6 Warrant a, School Crossing A traffic control signal may be warranted at an established school crossing when a traffic engineering study of the frequency and adequacy of gaps in the vehicular traffic stream as related to the number and size of groups of school children at the school crossing shows that the number of adequate gaps in the traffic stream during the period when the children are using the crossing is less than the number of minutes in the same period (sec. 7A-7). When traffic control signals arc installed entirely under this warrant: 1. Pedestrian indications shall be provided at InFi for each crosswalk established as a school crossing. 2. At an intersection, the signal normally should be traffic -actuated. As a minimum, it should be semi -traffic -actuated, but full actuation v.th detectors on all approaches may he desirable. Intersecuon installations that can be fitted into progressive signal systems may have prcurned control. J. At non-mtcrseclion crossings, the signal should be pedestrian - actuated, parking and other obstructions to view should be prohibited for at (cast too fin in advance of and 20 feet beyond the crosswalk, and the installation should include suitable standard signs and pavement markings. Special police supervision and/or enforcement should be provided for a new non -intersection installation. 6C-7 Warrant 5, Progressive Movement Progressive movement control sometimes necessitates traffic signal installations al intersections where they would nor otherwise be warranted, in order to maintain proper grouping of vehicles and effectively regulate group speed. The Progressive Movement warrant is satisfied w;. cx I. On a one-way street or a street which has predominantly unidirectional traffic, the adjacent signals arc so far apart that they do not provide the necessary degree or vehicle platooning and speed control, or 2. On a two-way street, adjacent signals do not provide the necessary degree of platooning and speed control and the proposed and adjacent signals could constitute a progressive signal system. The installation of a signal according to this warrant should be based on the 85-percentile speed unless an engineering study indicates that another speed u more desirable. The installation of a signal according to this warrant should not be considered where the resultant signal spacing would be less than !000 feet. 6C-3 Warrants 6, Accident Eaperiexe The Accident Experience warrant is satisfied when: I. Adequate trial of less restrictive remedies with satisfactory observance and enforcement bas failed to reduce the accident frequency; and 2. Five or more reported accidents, of types susceptible to correction by traffic signal control, have occurred within a 12-month period, each accident involving personal injury or property damage to an apparent tutu of $100 or more, and 3. There exists a volume of vehicular and pedestrian traffic not less than 90 percent of the requirements specified either in the Minimum Vehicular Volume warrant, the Interruption of Continuous Traffic warrant, or the Minimum Pedestrian Volume warrant; and a. The signal installation will not seriously disrupt progressive traffic flow. Any traffic signal installed solely on the Accident Experience warrant should be semi -traffic -actuated (with control devices which provide proper coordination if installed at an intersection within a coordinated system) and normally should be fully traffic -actuated if installed at an isolated intersection. 6C-9 Warrant 7, Systems Warrant A traffic signal insiallaGoi: at s.,me intersections i ay be warranted to encourage concentration and organ cation of hafti. Aow networks. The Systems warrant is applicable when the comnam intersection of two or ,Smuun K'-10 %Urmath.Conlbi ationof Warrants rAddenduml lugc 4C-12 steer the doer whs..txm. add the by/h., 8fia new, sub zI 4l.'-I0.4 Warmiul2Sglrar�Yfaen and Handicapped ykdoariao Crmi I, %igning, madul� aaJ signal warrants and guldehnes caving Benin cis. t 1 hnudn apx`d pcdeurun crmsmgs sec Appendix A. Trallw Signal Wars fJFyraeAS p vuS v I v'eIt k lip txosS Si+wT VoIUMtS CjoO+) 1/ciliclU /��1r hewr 111�+ h Ovt ✓f.vy Its' ��} Y-Gwj +:14� W M aYY.1y I 0Y 1✓a Uv'9•.c+ OZ des sAef /�(1 VOIV MeA yPiv 'Ij tilt hours g;y 4,afIt µAfr�Ut7yLLvs.1.< f.p pt iar�t 9lit drP1''� fed D.lf er 141C iN b. Ax J ! OJINUINi d e,%f< "cast hours L -j,avat wtti-. vxxAicl� iltA/Ctit r S/alaln.0 fss ��+it°+t� D. V-C at Ne+ Yl�.cc� hA� o� 1fy�-Ir.Itt NIrrA..7fT. ?f innuYa Supplement tihc. i S-W-ub more major routes has a total existing, or immediately projected, entering volume of at least 800 vehicles during the peak hour of a typical weekday, or each of any five hours of a Saturday and/or Sunday. A major route as used in the above warrant has one or more of the following characteristics: I. It is pan of the sues or highway system that serves as the principal network for through traffic flow; 2. It conneco areas of principal traffic generation; 5. It includes rural or suburban highways outside. entering or traversing a city; a. It has surface street freeway or expressway ramp terminals; 5. It appears as a major route on an official plan such as a major street plan in an urban arm traffic and transportation study. 4C-10 Wamanl 8, Combination of Warrants In exceptional cases, signals occasionally may be justified where no single warrant is satisfied but where two or more of Warrants I, 2. and 7 are satisfied to the extent of 80 percent or more of the stated values. Adequate trial of other remedial measures which nose less delay and inconvenience to traffic should precede installation of signals under this warrant. 4C-10.1 Warrant 9—Four Hoer Volumes The Four Hour Volume Warrant is •aisfied when each of any four hours of an average day the plotted points representing the vehicles per hour on the major street flotal of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on :he higher volume minor street approach (one direction only) all fall above the curve in Figure a-7 for the existing combination of approach lanes. When the 851h percentile speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour or when the intersection lies within a built-up area of an isolated community having a population less than 10.000. the four hour volume requirement is satisfied whcn the plotted points referred to fall above the curve in Figure 4-9 for the existing combination of approach lanes. rv-t' 4C-10.2 Warram 10. Peak Hour Delay The peak hour delay warrant is intended for application where traffic conditions aresuch that for one hour of the day minor street traffic suffers Irvbx undec delay in entering or crossing the major street. The peak hour delay warrant is satisfied whcn the conditions given below exist for one hour On, four consectnive 15 minutc periods) of an average weekday. The peak hour delay warrant is met when: 1, the total delay experienced by the traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four chick -hours for a one -lane approach and five vehicle hours for a two-lane approach, and 2. The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or eaceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes, and 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 8W vph for intersections with four (or more) approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. IC-10.3 Warrant 11, Peak Hoerr 3'oluiet The peak hour volume warrarm is also intended for application when traffic conditions are such that for one hour of the day minor street traffic suffers undue traffic delay in entering or crossing the major street. The peak hour volume warrant is satisfied when the plotted point represrmmg the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicle per hour of the higher volume minor street approach (one direction only) for one hour (any four consec . 15-minute periods) of an average day falls above the curve in Figure a-5 for the ousting combination of approach lanes. When the 35th percentile speed of nn,or street traffic exceeds 40 mph or when the intersection tin within a buif-up area of an isolated community haling a population less than 10,00f r peak hour volume requirements rs satisfied when the plotted point rfrew, to above falls above the curve in Figure 4-6 for the existing combination of approach lanes. aC-I I Factors Cwverotag Selection of Type of Control The principal factors that may [cad to the favorable consideration of traffic -actuated control in the selection of the type of signal control include: L Low, fluctuating or utsbalanccd traffic volumes. 2. High side street traffic volumes and delays only during the peak hours. y. The pedestrian or accident warrant is the only warrant which is met. a. The installation is to provide for one-way movement of two-way vafhc S'as'tion iC-10 Warrant g, Combination or Warrants (AdderMum) page 4C-12 Afmr the last suh c,ti.n, add the following as a raw subsmtion. 4C-10.4 Waront 12 Senior Citizen and Handicapped Pedestrian Crossftg For signing. marking, and signal warrants and guidelines covering scmnr dl¢en and handicapped pedestr an crussings sec Appendix A. Traffic Signal Warrant. 5 The msullmmn is at a non-imetstttian location._ _ _-.--L _. _ N,nnesota Supplement Sheet T// /2- •S_!r _.Neva. O�'4 i�,r GrK �ls�/t w•ui« MWf1vo ----- T/ys. it1Gf+Mt dotes tef...nut..c[i4_ JXiiL er.�ariti i • A&iM � Cn; Viz) �w h— _v_•1...,�.......,h Il ---�----'-Wp.'/G,� pc;v_e_�w.�; __NrLrn_�*- .✓arrr��.Z Su ft y� rhk•,...%j..../A- t . sue![-� ��.,,.-✓1 �.1--y.wy__— -------�G.ir�C'_Vy(/�--wt._ �4_.?'�_..k<%r._b*�t.._r�w_i•sli://arij±a/-�'---.. ii t-A --- - ------_..ia k.rc.,f�nu --- *v-. ..7 N.,. • s�ena/ i-L.�, �wKvfi._irw./— � __—_ (63-1ro,ly-cits ptr *Aar 41wr,f-- do;Yl-- . _ ._-. eiK"---..�li!+. ...n..'/�G.J :✓l,C,)--- lLS___•f/M_ __.. — rcN•G Lt_.Qi__�'`�._G•+i .i...l j✓a jr n tr Yews- . �4,'7--_/1� _o c.-t:�+`t-- i-� I...., w_ft_ —_ I,� 1 '� 12.�Lnn�•—tip!`%1N.--yir; 6: �. __�� i�_1 iti'�47s�.(i+r,. Car,--- "-`-.�i(.t �.qL. A"!mtwc-___ ✓try li���✓aly __.� �L- �f- wfi. ova►_/_tii+vr'KrawL 4 — --- T B `l-,�f "tyPa. - --- C. r. r. pur ra a.r frr_ r�rt• ca.rtr V.a...r r. e. r.! cwa! rrrr.rsr w..... • nr.rs _ wer T(f) 1_rlrt IYo ..c_ Te Me[ uc. t1..w 30 ]Y M. Nl .Nt WrMI. t, T x f. .�rir.Y �1 co.•y-•: 'Ka trt:. k.t Jd.vu iaM.-.. n. `n•j.. 54W'� ._1 t..„ a'�w (iN.y. eest d.r-• r.�.:.o. (•r.... 51,.at5.. Tlsas !4•� Mu I. w.Y N"c a. be �. �,r r:.. a,. - - u.. T is rn C+Yat# vsll nr f ia. ,.;,,r. S+r•<# ve(...+s ab Ftvi ie 0.•••., »•iM.:. (4 SL...a vV4Y 'ne• _. }Q Writ w lLj S: VtM'dei !<r bs. rrc r•••i•d h. 'R+ GfcK brut ie M"# Hn.r« wrn. rr _'Mt �5 165 ltaw l err w..r4.�la Goic .''r. r' �. rer c.n. G.:TE ��% DSTRICT TRAFFIC ENGINEERING. STATION RECORCEH_ LOSTRWTION DIST S OT. E. �A TZ, CITY oarr MOTOR VEHICLE TRAF: IC VOLUME AND TI RNING M(WFMFNT a 11 n = I .T wm r�WIN& r�rasn�s�r � - /�'�! Via' rn Afli7t�">• a'm���E�t��� F1���E� �rfn�irmr�rs�r r�Ear�■ tt-av, l�s�nr�wawm s�r�is��s�ras>in�t r�F��ri �ria�s '• rfrx��a rlsi�r��s�s�rr;3s€rr rn��;�rr�►r�� 42188.2 -�r COUNCIL. I4fETI116 RPR 251989 TO: Mayor and City Council �FROM: Mack Bernhardson, City Adminlatrato* CITY OF 001joW DATE: April 21, 1988 SUBJECT: Administrator's Information CITY/SCHOOL DISTRICT INTERVENTION AGREEMENTS - The School Board ___ ______ ----- __ _ _ at is April approved the CTty]Scliool agreement for cooperation between the two agencies as it relates to drug and alcohol usage by students within the district. TERI NAAB - Just to announce for your information that Teri and Peter Naab are the proud parents of Benjamin who was born on Tuesday, April 12, 1988. Benjamin joins his brother Courtney, who is now two years old. WATERFOWL CONTROL AMENDMENTS - This item was elated for action by the Council aE tAfe Eime, However, the appropriate drafts were not ready and this will be considered at the May 9, 1988 meeting. C'jU„CIL MEETING P.PP, 251988 LIST OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVALYIYV OF DRuND FOR MEETING OF April 7.5, 1188 �I �1. RY Solicitors License - The Rose Man Al Penke Septic System Installers - Elmer J. Peterson.Comgany Route 2, Box 226 Delano, MN 55328 Garbage and Refuse Collectors - R a W Sanitation, Inc. 5525 County Road 50 Carver, MN 55315 Redpenning Services 2076 County Road 90 Maple Plain, MN 55359 License No. APPLICATION FOR SOLICITATION - 520.00 fee Date Received Date Expires CITY OF ORONO 1335 BROWN ROAD SOUTH BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 Organization: �£ /?OIL An Phone Address: A 1 y« �_ ., ✓nyn /rih SC7,1/ CITY OF ORONO Representatives �/ f�,,f Phone -3-- OFFICE N Address: i„S�yn+F 01 0 MOO Check One: Business Solicitation _ X Contribution SolicLOtionTL X.00 RECEIPT-TZK70U Number of People Solicitating within the City L3 0074300 CON R01 T14:0. 0 Provide list of Names of Solicitors on beck of this application. Type of Product to be solicited !`SAS f i'u4 {/�wf ,rlS fLs[//c¢7CS PERMIT EXPIRES 60 DAYS FROM APPROVAL DATE. POLICE CHIEF SHALL HAVE FIVE (5) BUSINESS DAYS IN WHICH TO INVESTIGATE AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION PURSUANT TO ORONO j(`, MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 5.30 SUBD 5(a). [. __________________________________________________________________________ ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON SOLICITORS Subd. 3. Prohibited Solicitation Practices. A. It is unlawful for any solicitor to engage in solicitation for any unlawful business or organizational purpose or activity. B. It in unlawful for any solicitor to practice harassment, nuisance, theft, deceit, or menacing, troublesome or otherwise unlawful activities during the course of solicitation. C. It is unlawful for any solicitor to enter, or attempt to gain entrance, to residential premises displaying at such entrance a sign with the words "Peddlers and Solicitors Prohibited" or 'Solicitors Prohibited". D. It is unlawful for any solicitos. to refuse to leave business premises when requested by the owner, leases, or person in charge thereof. E. It is unlawful for any person to engage in contribution solicitation without completion of licensing or registration as herein provided. F. It is unlawful for any person to engage in business solicitation without a license as herein provided. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The undersigned hereby agrees to the conditions quoted above from the Orono Municipal Code and any additional requirements the City staff may have. Signature of Applicant: /eZ "a________________Date r _____________________________________ ____._ ____ FO�CITY USE ONLY: After review of application, staff recommends the following: ^L Approval of application Denial of application Signature of City Officials ` '/ Date: Signature of Police Chiefs �T?CG.fa-z.. rl a-f�i DaCes �1�k.t NARRS OF SOLICITORS Names );Izel Names Addresse Addresse Phone, _ Phonet License No. License No. C-Sin- -91Z Name: Address: /,F�.T .(4/�P/,D iil£kJ Phone: el73 -SLiO Licens No. Name: Address: Phone: License Name: Phone: License No. Name: Addresse Phone: License No. (If additional names, please attach list) 6Tg V �(\ 2 " il Of 0110NO� aywl My, Minnam on, LICENSE APPLICATION BUILDING a ZONING - I11J357 "SLSSING All questions must be answered. License fee, bond, certificate of insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification or Home Sewage ompany Allaapplicationsoare t subjects touat ten c(10) day happrovapplication.is approval period. 1. Business or trade name E]Aer J. Peterson Co. 2. Business address R R /2 Box 226 Delano MN 5532E 3. Business phone 471-0151 Residence phone 972-2420 I 6. Name of applicant or company representative holding MPCA certification Alfred a Janes Braeeelmane i l«. 5. Type of certification heldl x Installer x Pumper Site evaluator Systemaeignar Is tthis a Provisiona'1—Certificate? o Certificate No.L. Q P 6. If no Certificate is held, provide evidence of attendance eat / one of the On -Site Swage Treatment Workshops held immediatel prior to the current construction season. 7. Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? Yes Most recent year 19137 B. Have you ever had a license revoked? no When? Where? _ 0. Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes_ No CITY OF✓,70NB SUB ITTALS REQUIRED: 5I0 0 0NAlf-OFFICE 1. $25.0� license application fee. 1J1 F 2. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City Of Q{,gn�9JafN 25.0 / obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be ac r ad. D.THANN Y011 ✓ 7. $10-50-100,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. m , /�, <. Copy of current MPCA Certificate or evidence of a C n``�e1ik�''C-0ri µ +Op�?J at On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshop held immediately B prior to current construction season. LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED. CITY USE ONLY List persons other than applicant who kre a,)thorkzed by y ou 0 apply for permits under your licena7 The undersigned hereby makes appI %��f. Orono, Minnesota, for license to install and repair septic syatems, and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws of the state of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of l JApplicants Signature Staff recommendation Approval1/�- DeniaY _ Date Af -JP -VLE> Reason for denial: A rovo n • City Council Action Date PP Date license mailed CIPY`BP ORONO Prd' Box 66 S.L*&tel Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 The undersigned wishes herewith makes applic License Year (nYf l0 5- 89 ate Received -/,1Dh Fee Paid 110 • _ Initials S LICENSE APPLICATION YATU'rhe-iniicaked business in the City of Orono and for a license to do so. Business/Pitt N a u g......... i^c " i u o^" -Off S—.4— I. - Address Street City) Late) Zip Code) Business Phone Number AAa-7aav Applicant's Name Address treat (City) total (zip Code) Phone Number AAA-7AII Check One: Individual Partnership _ T Corporation Number of Vehicles to be used in Orono Description of Vehicles (attached list if more): Loaded Loaded Year M_•gr. Gross wt. Rear Axle wt. Size Yards Licenee Number a neff 1976 Meek S1.Oo0 20 Yd.eooactor YR63520 1970 White 51.000 _ 26lidcgomasec€or Yx9821ffy OF DM 1980 &Q]L. 51.000 roll -off bed YI982WANCE OFFICE 490al MHA of 61t90Qervea .,,,.,, roll -off bed Yx # 01 WN 90.00 Schedule of Collection charges/ dates Approximate number of customers in Orono reri.. 90.00 YOU 1 707.0 04/11W Location of dumping areaLa„{.,,":. ...ndH 11 I,r, .ta rd,n MN -------------------------------------------------------------------------- IN ORDER POR THIS APPLICATION TO BE COMPLETE, YOU MUST UNCLOSE THE FOLLOWING: Surety bond in the amount of $1,000. Proof of insurance in the amount of $300,000-$300,000-$50,000, and 10-day cancellation clause. Annual fee is a $30.00 flat rate fee, plus $15/truck, and a $30.00 transfer fee (if applicable). -------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am the owner and operator of the above business and I have paid all license fees y and taxes required by law. The above information is correct. Applicant Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOR CITY USE After review of application, staff recommends: Appr va Denial Other (specify) �t - Ig gnature of C Itf Off cial Date CITY OF ORONO License Year Gip/ • S f'1 P.O. Box 66 I I. 2 Date Received -.go - Crystal Bay, MN 553 31`�I —�_ Fee Paid -If'- Initials 473-7357 U l��'— GARDA PUSR COLLECTOR'S LICENSE APPLICATION The undersigned wishes to operate the indicated business in the City of Orono and herewith makes application for a license to do so. Business/Ff rm Business Phone Number '/ / '7 - 1 Check One: Jr� Individual Partnership Corporation Number of Vehicles to be used in Orono / CITY OF ORM I INAACE OFFICE Description of Vehicles (attached list if more): Iii1100000 M Loaded Loaded If ;E,N 45.00 Year Nfgr. Gross Wt. Rear Axle Wt. Sire/Yards LiceC,ns lluri 88a 45•00 -'NANA YOU N07090 C001 R01 T11::0 04/70109 General area of City servedplO emu.!/F. �/44 Fi O'v/'ROlViL'HP_ H/{U(ti! /i �f/ /{,C c. ,j A, WrFi cr ,1, �( tin GTx„Wd Y✓c YU. Schedule of Collection charges/ date"' ` //. n P L' si cAr T<f U Approximate number of customers in Orono O t7 Location of dumping area Y r,r,/ r V14 L F /t 'Y"y ! C"" K !. /l.L'l) r/L L- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- IN ORDER FOR THIS APPLICATION TO BE COMPLETE, YOU MUST ENCLOSE THE FOLLOWING: Surely bond in the amount of $1,000. Proof of insurance in the amount of $100,000-$300,000-$50,000, and 10-day cancellation clause. Annual fee In a $30.00 flet rate fee, plus S15/truck, and a $30.00 transfer fee (if applicable). -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 am the owner and operator of the above business and I have paid all license fees and taxes required by law. The above information is correct. Applicant Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOR CITY UBB OML.: After review of application, staff recommends: v A rov Denial Other (specify) Signature of Clytorricial Date U �A CITY OF OIIONO q EMPL-NO NAM[ DIV e�l 1J P A Y A c�*7 Y_T_D9______ 011088 GROSS EKP/ALLOY ANDERSON BL 31 11071.67 1E97, 10 _ ����''+.. i BERNHARD80 ME le 151E7.E3 1928.10 '•'�1 nl_LII190 1190 80921114 SA 31 70S6.71 1198.26 BOSMA JL it 3716.09 586.69 FPP 2 5 j9�9 BOYLAN SD 93 172.13 172.13 BRINKMAUS CHESWICK JF GB 12 31 12209.29 113ET. 19 1516.71 1118.00 .may O n Alfj � U��� CORNICK JL 31 10391.95 1395.80 DENNISON RJ 3S 1566.10 216.75 ENGLISH 11 IN 31 9946.10 1387, 83 ERICKSON ❑J 93 0.00 0.00 ERICKSON Kit 31 1133S.71 1118.00 FISCHENICH OT 31 1e8S.16 1111.95 PRITZLCR IN 31 11166.64 1305.36 SAFFRON MF 33 9316.96 1166.40 GERHARO8nN IN ♦E 13069.60 1636. 08 GREGORY JD 1E 9115.07 1066 10 HALLIN OR IC BeEs.01 1030.00 NANSEN Sc 1E 8388.11E 959.E0 HANSING CJ 31 3513.69 S11.38 MOOGENAKKE JE 31 336.00 E1.00 JACOBS TJ 33 1316.e3 1166.40 JOHNSON BP 31 100e1.09 1E61.8E KILBO MN 31 110ES.T9 1760.00 KIMNYCZUK M 31 1113.66 SEE.Ix KNOTT MJ _3 0.00 O.JT KNUTSON CA 15 •701.E6 611.13 KUCHN TM IS IC01w.' I+0 ♦.40 LINDSTROM DJ 93 9.00 0.00 MABUBTH JA 33 113e9.11 1416.e1 METER MA 35 ES OR 0.00 MIKCLGON RA IS 7033.66 see.96 MILLS IN WH 13 lei so lei SO MORAN MF 31 iIT3e.35 IDES. 38 MOROWCZYN5 J 31 11019.19 11-4T. 51 MORROW JS 31 e790.19 RIT. 75 NAAS TL lE 6615,50 OE6.10 OAS DO 93 111.00 714.00 OMAN LE 33 771C.98 961. 05 PALMER IB 31 175.99 0.00 PETERSON PL lE 3TCT.16 166. 01 PETERSON RM 93 0.00 0.00 PCTRAN JC 33 0 00 a 00 OUAST VA 9E 8793.11 1013.9E Ross JA 93 e9 eS e9. ES SASS JJ 16 8327. 39 951.E0 SCHAUSS CA 31 741S 11 958. 30 SKR[EN OS 18 53ST 61 959. to SMITH JR 9[ 7-706 as 1013 9E STEFF[MMAB R[ 93 5569 89 IOTA 80 8T[VENS 59 93 157 30 157. 50 INO CUT OF .1-3I-N FACE MCI OR Yn AIRPORT` �_ I/01 RK111TIN fCC", w 1. 1 I 0 • MIISAN w 11 WW" !Il_N MAL *1� 8, CAMR., fl-K{FIN-)1 MMV4 SN.N .Gnu WW" 11111.04 IST NY LY[O IIG va TO Lt f1-.1Y-IN-It IYWAL MYH WN/u NL T) IST NAY LY[S qY wu TO Lf 61-fIN-011-15 MWAL wCN1• WN/N Il.n IV YIN Labe 11N f/N TO Lf •IYI N-NI-II MIVAL xCNI• NIN/N a," III NN LLL'St FICA VAR TO L{ fl-11Y-111-]I MWGL wCNI• N/N/II N.N IST NN I.E. FICA VAR TO ]/f •I-IIY-IIS-L MISILL .. wCNu 1./NAf 30.11 IST NAY LYG FICA RIM TO Lf N-.IK-1[I-]I MMLL - wCNI• WN/N 13.64 IST SANK LAYS IIG IIY TO ]/f tl11Y-IN-)I 11Wµ wtYH N/N/N K1. fl AIT NN LAYS 11" [/Y TO ]/f •IMIY-IL-]) MwAL .cul. N/N/N 1.01 NT Mas LAY{ I. RIM TO Lf 1111K-1N-rt utaj L IAOttI. NnI/N ]ILN I.T tAw L. -" ITG VAR 10 vs ll-.1N-fK-K MY1LL IACRI. t./AVSt IS ad, 1.1 YM LAYS FIG t/G TO L{ II-UN-[Tf-fl M1WN .CNI• N/N/I1 113 T) NT tAN LAMS I)G t M TO Lf lf-.IN-{.hll AWY .0441. WNIFF 1Y.N III MIY LYG ----7I4th RIM TO L1 1]-uM-{{1-N afiaL .1. NIN/N 111.N 1.1 MY LA It" t/G TO Lf ...... ...-MS _ MCYII WN/u 171.tl w1 UTILITIG -- 01-QN-IN-11 MMIK IICNII WY/N 196.31, w1 UTILITIES n. OI-NItIN-T MNIAL - xCNll WN/N f.n MI UTILITIES a1MRf-In-34 .Cull f1/N/aa IN.]! NI UTILITi Ca _ -il-K1MlN-K IYYtX .Gull N/N/N II.N Mt, UTIL"T U U-.]f.-[11-f1 IYNML 'x x "17 W.4169 I.Au.0 wI UTILITIG 11-CX.-S.F11 IYYIIML _ xCNn N/N/N 114.23 aV UTt Lt TtlS l 314-561-12 MINAL .11 f1/1t/N Was NI UTILITIES 1f-.1f0-{Nd3 MYe1l a .CM,, N/N/N IL of Mti ..EL W.Tlwt 11-1]Ll-1]1-11 MWY :Ilk -_ .CNII e./N/Y M.G YtO WOOo INIYY METING 11-NN-a ]s-N IIf1NtL :a Ms1 _.. .Cate, e./NIN 6.11 C. Mev IµG Was StAr let A 01-i1a"NFN .1` AL 6.66 . nY �1 xcflee N/N/u __ __--Mae III NY LAY{--"_ Ft" ]I1 n 31!1_—".U-fttl-YI-11 MWK .Lute t./NIY M.N IST MM LAXAM •IcA Ll TO ][fa 1111Y-1T-11 "WAS. Z"a wcul. N/N/N W.N I[T MAY LAYt IIG Ll TO LN N-f1Y-111-1{ ..A, r cut. W'WN .Was _ _ NT MIR Lt -FIG"N II11 WAA. .CNCt N/N/N tl.N I81 MIDI LIIY{ IIY Ll n ]/t1 a",Y-111-)1 ..A. �( .cult FAIN/N �I 181 NY LAtt1 It" ]/1 Is i/11 al-.IY-11{-11 MMUK .Cute F.IN/u _ _ _ _N -s.Y III MAII LRAM qG N TO Lag NMIY-MIDI ..AL .Cuf! WN/N ILN I.T NN 1.99 It" Ll TO Val •111Y-tN-)1 ..AL I .cane N/N/M Oi.M 1.1 . LYG ITG YT 10 ]/fF F1-.1N-11.-]] MMIM .C.... F./WY - 1.i IlT FAIR LYG /IG " n LG a1J1Y-INJS MIIUAL .C.... u.'N/N NLN I.Y W LYG FICA Ll TO was II-4,1Y-aN-N MINLL , INS C11T OF "ON0 CMECN REGISTER 03-31-24 PAGE e C.ECE W DATE .ROUMT UENOON ITEM K$CNVTEA ACCOUNT NO. INr. 0 P 0 G MESSAGE .Coate 1.100,66 33 00 IST SA. LAYER FICA LT TO LM 01-41 Q-E16-41 MNUAL .CQtr 0♦106/60 T 40 If, SAMI LANES FICA LT TO 3M 71-4I42340-91 141NIK .Caere 04r041/60 l?a 04 It, SANE LANES FICA M TO LM D-41 Q-56E-1O OASINIA. ' .Cent 1.1O6/ER 0E 41 I1T Mee LYRa FICA M Er SM H-OIQ-SOa-13 MINIMAL I,t1. Tt • _ __ _ _ _ _ .COSE] 04/66/at m at POSTMeTEa POSTAGE 0I-41tl-431-1O NMEIAL .Carr] H1061aa a at POETMETtl POa TAGS aI-ON-t.Mtt MIRML .Cot 3 04104100 al 00 POSTMSTEN 10ITACE tl-.3t1-t50-10-- ..r/RZ .UtO .4104/66 Ia0. 00 POSTMrTER POSTAGE a1-AXI-ON-1{ MMIrL , .CPS] 1.106/94 It ae POETMSrE* POSTAGE 61-Am,-I"-31 MNUAL - .Carol 0.1001" 1t0 J0 POSTMSTER POSTAGE e1-43tt-1 T.-= -' MANUAL .Gaol WaS'to S. ER POSTRASTER POSTAGE 01-4321-8I9-M IIIENU/IL tea o0 .tree. e4100100 03 TG AUNT LNI CNSON LICENSES tt-4383-129-31 IMwRL y( .l TG • _ __ __ •..... amwo-g / E,1" N FUNp 01 TOLL GENERAL. FMO I,Ga1 lr PO.O Tr TOTAL WTEN OFENATIM gllp I,OIT aE PMNO Tl TOTAL OEM. OPERATING MD �( ra] EE PUNO T. ICIAL GOLF COMet OPERATING FO LOGE IE TOTAL �( rc uA 4L nOi LID 110 On w ..pMo GM[n N MTt � IIH1. [•/YVN [ uI+ 0./t1IN n RI+ eaan. ( �UeH 0•/O /N ++aa 1. N•/e+/es ( ++ell• •./s+/es 116134 1 'IH 0.121/48 a03e 0.1911N A,OOMT Sl U +l R IL1 0. .[t LL [TL of amps mtGIGTY Au ttN GL[MIC Ram STOW LpIMG 04-"-00 .AGE I ACCOOMT M0. IMI. . I;O_011[tMN Of-.Np-t01-{p AT { T CG1111 —_.. ROlms Ny7G.•IGF]I AT { T Call) T6Y!! —_-•1 AT . T Conn_ _— _lL-QltlJ2irN— It «.-au AMCMOR .AI[[ pAIQ /MMGLI! 01-4116-079-12 :f AMCMM .Amp- 9"tc< AMCMO, IAIp — OIIIM mM.LISS N-IGIG-IGL-]I .:L. ARDl(N1 FAR" Y.IICG MM.LIGS ANCHOR IAI[t— -_ OII�CY mIMLl" _ EARL s AMOEMNM A•SC pm1O1 W.W SIGNOR 111 tl1-[t0-61 61-&EW-049-61 - E.RI . ..OE.MR .•IC --- -OIIICI 1614 14/81/N ♦ El ILITI ORE m I.TO- MMILI[t { O • ••ylrlyfill+� •160T• 0.1E+1e. 41 t. .OM[tt R00 RO.LM[ AM [M R[TAIIfL RG 11-AM-t..Ml L IIa01• /N .11 U LOM[LT.00 RORIt AM tm COMPILTIN [N 11-63415941M1 11-.].L-I.I-Cl ll..T• 0[./[I•/[✓N 1NA) LOM[[T.00 10•[ML AM [MI YIIOiE INN [MS COM.OLTiM. no .1-4SM-6.t--7r- --- - — Brae,. 1./[I/N Tt. [t TI.IN .a1[RRoo RONM[ AM .p,mR.00 ROAM[ AY G11L RICMIo0p a ( "a'. N,21/N •]." GOt.TR00 "MARK AGM [AMtR_ p[N.1�]A.�— 1]'O>•MM•fp --� I+.R. wall" IN.R RI1aa IImNOMw p►IR mmKtA R-eelt-IaG-]t nHn 64.'81I111 ---- 104.56 v ..' IINM. -_ Nm7il _.-.. -Nl. Go - plfG[T7iTR1�— — - 1.4 •' td1_le ppt[YI CGIMtIML MN CI M IIT RIM 11-.SSL-IN-II _ '• IH/t1 te/t,/N 1 'SBe C.-• OI JIIOMc r I ItaVB a./t"9• • ' Haw N.n na Iltl)t a./LI/M O ,Ill)• N/al/U 116.34 0./a, /N • Iola S./e1 /s0 1161.1 H/EI/N 11aI.2 vN ISO • 141.2 0./L 11t 1.1 0./21/N Ita144 O.Ift/N • ' 110N3 N/tl/M 1161.2 0./21/N 1111.) N/el/N • 1TUe) BNtlM n[1.3 Y '.N 11.) • 11LN) er 111.3 e. + 116143 04/.1..i •. N.N. 11410e we, ,false e0/et/ON • IIsISe 04,111/141 Hato _".. 01/al/0S • 1 Want L/n ne • �'.H] 04,2110, eT • CN[« Ktl eT[R 04-05-N PaG[ 2 1w0 vl VtMDON IT[11 DESCRIPTION KCMT N0. ,NV. S P.0_9 WSMGE 161 as CNOILL W T OTIL 1Y0 16, as tU 1l UtlsT fl UfI1L11 fT11ee C�RTlw. ��St-0M-1 T1-A .a Of .I s. MLPNIAL LIPS NO as LIM I11a al-IILi�a1S-)1 41 ss CReN1�1.IK _BLL Q�_._Sl/�tY _ ___.w_Irlse-ItF71 _ I.e 51 ILL 04 CDPT W PR Ills Only SUPPLIES LtrtthoL-tt 12 1. (WT Sfr OR INC DPV1« MIPLIU_____91-YIS••Si1_S{ 1•E .e C PY DID PN 11.0 )`%, s LtU �1-YIS-t�►•)I COI, WO PR IYC O.EICS SOPPLI[S H-Y10-1/S-)1 241 Ca CWi DW OR INC 0i1 DCE SWPLI[S 1! 1a COPY " OR INC - artim swfttn aSi le . so CONNQCIAL LIP[ 1.8 LIK IOIP YI-- —01 H140--�1� ---- - - - S +a COINILRCIK LIFE INS LIM Ii YR n-NSM-NO-tf L TO GOINIOICIOL LIVE INS LIM IU YR ] io CDNN[RCIK Lti[ ENS Lir�lU RM--- ---01-1i(t7T— S 1a CONNgClAL LlI[ SIN LIM LM YL 0t-atON'•ItL-)a 1 10 C01N•SCILL LIts INs LIMIU ale - S .0 CONNLICINL LIFE INS LIM IM NR - 91-11ON•aM-1� l2 CO,R1OKItLL LIFE IRS LIM INS 1M /l-NY•NL-S1 7P 1 OS CO..NIRCIIL LIVs INS LIM INS .a[ 1f-atY-s0hs! _ 1. C•S•eCIAL LIM LLIL--LIM INS am— 1e-7IKQ1IVVm9w-- _ is It . 11 60 CULLIGN MINT ILOa1 al-IN)-10-I1 13 04 CLLLIsm - MIST eLMe -"- Ti-l).TilheO --- ]I ae- CLLLISIN MINT tlOeO 11-434K1S-141 L I. WLiNdL�_'' _Raw-8Lww_._._y.__ 11 at. Is. Ls ENNtC WING CO cO aBl 1N "mr ThNR-SII-tt --" S. SI - IV 4•' OEEIC[ SVPLI LI 01-.21 a-•59-1♦ 1.914 00 -n/t.. MAIL LLNVILY__ 3. 941 sn -- - r _ .... COS f is60� 1 r 4 T T w M ! OWN r MR is� -Gomm LOM Pr QTAI/N C] sw + 'IMAM A! - -tN/N - .Nl1 n• � • 11YTT lue. �. I N716 NA11M !, IM.H Ifi.N /l !1 M" Kf�M ITq ![K\VTIM ]CCO T *0 f1/I. :i summ PART! CO AMW PART! •1-KY-1Hd1 _._ _ ____--_ amwmw PA&Y6 CO -- [Wlr PART[ fI-MM-111-46 , dmR PARO 00 MIP PARTS 11-1lY-elf-11 .� PVIT!-0 -_gWIP PARTI— ltftl[-M/-T! illllt PART/ M fl4V /ART1� wP-r -17_. _.._— _ •„ 1 �P �, lwl �!• f� 1H)Ni1H) — --------- --'— -- ! sm m lm _--- ----i1-Uflt CUT11 -N1-K < • { . AR.Ytm RM RAW iaAiAiw _—T)-Yti-iN-fff- ! . 4 !OlrCO THR•-lN-S] �.. ! \ m m CJ�Zrw 'al �flt•IIfX p--_-1/]K iFl,li]rf --_ _�Aa1 :a e71 CTT QQ6s PT" 4CIlo:• _ - _ 01-/=h1M-31 _ Nl�1 CTT WT TAX /YT"E ►f-I]!1-N[-1] 9i ICM \[T AT IMP -[M V. lw "I ez 04K5-00 F!K t 1 .. abbe cm OF wm L11EY11 floltTM S 114M I101 Mid IPTIM tCtlY� Iq. tW ! V- ID pE(i . MTl 0 .. __ — ( 11N)1 t./t1 /!! CITV OF LS LFY MIfF LIFT tTATIM 'L-000-MO'SL :f ( uua •s se Lf nsou lIISFflI' 7lfl 40 f 111•tt !}�!/N _ _.__ Es MYWS N MYIR MIN BI-I1C1-1!!-)1 O•/!1/!! tt OO mf Y I11V t!lV---- ]M IfKSCT10fS BI-QiN-11.-A f nHN N..Y • _ _ __ _._ -- _ St - - R1f0 W�i6 COIITl0. _ OVd Oil CIWOY _--_B(-1tlS-BBB-1� 111474 Wfl/M S.• `• SO . NMS 04/t1:N - EQUIP ►PI1T_ - __OI�Ql�1 O- BI-.1lH�'M s•/t1•0 ME i).t t arts OITNh GO UTILITIES t • )v a1 use• u••s C•/n/st V TI ntEftfly4i. __—_.__ wturt" f971 f IItfM of Y FIY B form MIST floc YYIF OI-O)Y-IM-)i !1-iL0_Ip-0I - 716M ,♦iY1.tB 6. as t1iIlES_i-�F�T1 _____AIM RT _ ----- 1as • ...-CEt is to IffLSO-YI. LOrNSl MMMMIM BSI-f)N-l7FU • RMU wcl/N as to qj rt •.� 11NM -1:40" - --wfrn!'*.VplMs- !! ..-�.,.>f MVVM IItY110M EQUIP PVTt twlflTy,T .+ral•, fB.vnswnc-- *W- tt-Cla-Itt-)1 `+ .. .., �` , IIf-\t -ONES nNAVY IW aM.`tr -►un-: •I-ni"41-Of _.. '^ •-. 116N wn/M — II ISM CIT OF pOOa fJ1[pt MC1\TEE N-N-M POOR S 4 • aia lA. a. I .1gwr Y[11oI _.. ITFS oE1ua�E1 tCEE111T p. I1N _\ P.o.. lower • IISfN P./21/\\ TT MV.ME 14A1101 JM swap PARTS N-KM-MFOI 11611441 04/21/60 IE.I\ MYLssE M11YARs Ewle PART.- 1142441 0.121/04 \I .1 wVARIE wRpwME EGu1P PPtT\ 61-4141 1 11 ll\SN 04/evu 37.10 wV.IIE IUlSIIIM EQUIP PARTS 01-0At 11 ` ' 11605 04121/04 Is N may"n NICE_ IMIN PARTS.__ \I-IJY0-1 T-]0 �— -- 116E40 _ 01/91/00 17 51 MV.ME VASWAM IQUV ►MT\ �FK)1--■ - �' lisEOS 00/2v66 51 MVARIE 11h[ swap PART 1E-C]KdM-05 • I1454111_ 90/11/06 1.1E MVAR01[_■I - —•I� It i 04/21/60 3.01 wV.MI IWENES& EQUIP PART 13-KY-569-90 ` IN1416 14/tl/N I1.T wV.ME IWlIIE■[ EQUIP PARTS 1]-434li\T-tt I Iw4k_ «/21/\\ 2.64.. MVIOEE 11011P1ME[ PARTS ' also" 0./!1 A\ fb.0 _. MVARM M■NM[ _EQUIP .MOSP _. MM•dE ••i tlspT__f Mo" 7f}�� I\P UTILITIES ft-4) -109-K —_ _ Y • ,Iowa _ M/p2M _ 111. /1 r - _ __.._- .. UTILITIES-T]-.]tasl-ft • 1.11S.tS • � •..NO ..P-CO • 1its" 40 It YOETt STEM 2ELL iELfllgli -- -•' 116140- 0'i/!1/410 II.So 1p1T1MsT O1ll _/E1.�IN� •1-OaEE Its1EE W91/M \E.T! MTO tos V \t-E:d-NFts 11so" WEl/N 1s.1) MrtTWASMO PILL__ 1N540 _ E./21/SS ._ 24 « 1 TM1[tTE01 SELL MIA P in T3-010-N9-K to __ IES tT . • 0011.0EE list? _. S\/[/M 1I Tf PUWIC_R SET /1OS■ PENA TO •1-H\/-M) 110 ._ .__. 1161.. W!t/M PUSLIC !1•L SET .stE an PCI. LEI TO 0If URI 14 \I-0N1-N1-11 • W91/N t of 1!a 00 T MT .SA PUSLIC PEI11 LEI TO 0/S \I-0101-00t11 Ilop WE1/M t RML P IC 4•L NET AS" PIS. LEI TOM \I-It01-11f-Il y liO W T 1IEN. ST Fl IC-Y L'My NOII PISA 46ti • if0 lI \0Pl1/N V.]s AL MT AR Pu Pnu Lt1 1) N WIT TO _lls"T—�1Pt10[.—_ timir ]fs.N t ft?C ONYPE■11_)IE1 TOM - 1NpT N/tl2 Kf.T :C_VpL_f RT P IC EI•L MT NM PE}. l/it t0 0q \1-0N1-ItS-Jl p" 11\1fT Nttl/M ■M.T PUSLIC [I•L MT «p PEN. J/tl TO 0/] 01-0141-tT0-33 1111TT M/UN /_ . IIEp l• T .SYI POSLIC tL M p]/ P. !1 t0 0/3 41-01N-fN-K ._.—_ .: ___ Isis"NV111M N.iS 0V1Lti ai►i 11f2-Np__ . M■CLE1""lE"a7--'Y1=i177=EERY—.—__ •- IISN1 NIas/M 61.K 0 is sl•L OST sOp PW Let TS V] . TM/0t-HMl .. 11EEIT 00/11/N 100. 31 _P11KI4 OWL WT. OE\al _.__ P�� 1/t1T� 1/a __I_01-N n aSn _ :./t1/N Of as W it COAL rI Y\O PU0 w_re !q 1\-\I\t-OOs-f • ]•,JRl..I . __ ._�.�._ A1NI]._E.._Wtl/N__�_ N .___E[OD�1lIII$_4EfE_.�IY2_�IEI�NU2P."' _ 4.07 s.. 1-0701,I�M-�! r N1 11 ] WIIIN El0 so Palo" T■IIOI MP.I■ "am M/f0 m2P \I-0141-1/0-il /aNq Wtl/N ]. N S� TORS ■vts■ Min Wel ■pIP lt-0N1-NM1 s.N 'EO ■ 111 lw M o swap 17N [ITi OF Mule cmm matem N-Q-M PAGE S f KMO• sm Qesu"IM N[.c@uw M. tM. @ F_0. • QSWt _._� EMICN M. Wa AMOUNT__ _ _. II6.37 N/II/N A.7f IOOO: FMO70 111F OAIC[ s.ve 'f t1{NI N/tl/{@ t.N QUOtNTINL LIFE Ind, MR II�{IQ•R-1■ ,'� • 114{4) WvS #S St.., FIIUOfeTIK_ - _- �- M M LIM IS --_- - 9Iy1Q-NS-1{ - 11{4A ../EI/" _ N.1.0 ♦NIAMMIIIL LIFE INS YN N-aIR-Itl-T 11{643 ll. at PRO IIIL LIFE INS YN INS YN {i-.IQ-ITa-)7 .�• 111N3 .."1/{. S. tc FR000TIIIL ___ _- -. LIFO _LIVE INS YR 116643 rufl/M S..o :f NAO . • • " 11 /— Wtt/N M.ti R c IMINf IFIG1ilpl� _ _ TtRIOML MYIF el-Yfl-IH-)1 d. _ as. IS 11{0{ 04/91/S{ 1.06.{{ mim c01R1 SII71ctt m 072 MIND .NM►Qe .. ..s... I t{TIa Ca/tt/{I 1,1N. 76 _ SirTti-Si eM IIYM-- ITT Yil-eutawa-_—_[i-RIl�SS1-1� _ +� - 1.114.SO . a� •.. [@III _ :. IIeTQ_mV IIS7N f4Wtl/M 6.c1_ Q.0 a 4e Sl@LsOIQ@ ROLL W ceNOQt1a1 SI-{W-Ite-ll.. _..__ • � I I/� __ Walm _.-.. - 07•H_ r. y� fiMeR1Y 11l 1fC . 1_FT1[tl _ 01-Y7E-1tS-)1 - I71.H • I/67H Wel/N 77.TO UNIFORM@ IISLINITSO GOTMIM N�R61�7t1-7t • 1107/It/O@ H N 01.Q WIF11RL1N17t7 Q i i mam_.__.__ S1�Yf/ IN -]I SI-{]H In-31 7f j»^eu- II{171 0a/[1/{9 1.1. )[ UNIFORMYILINITpi CLOTMIM6 �» )R {7 . —� •WEI,__-Nc.NJ.—_. fM1__:3:ifS111►,RpTIL�M:a.' -:tL St�A_1_t{@_-Nt__i r' __ _ "I -IaRM:- _ .-us "ovum co -LINT[ win 7tWR-S{Y1f ,f �.-AMATM s • ! .; saw =..rR_ M6-r I1. • ..O.. I OOR IOsk S • 04.18 •. tIflO_ _._ N/nnt..co •ttY #1 st-al -- - wTIM EMII. INC min mse tM IF 71-4740-fN-12 { 11{NO {{/OI/M L/t.M TMItOMIts-A w TOM A a/OI-•,IO ?U-4261-4100-1e :•:. 1»0O[ _-._OelOuft. _._JIL01_._ _Twom l)ss-».p _)1_.N INC tW70 fl O taf-31 „{ _._ IU7N_-_6{[p/Y ___..w.N. e[•TI_lrR-1! _�itR_Ig 11 �. t1'E7�HN-��_ 49.00. • 'Hle{ e.(H.tO .__-- �It1'gcl MV tOwt e1-It1-)1 WN— _t7.w b.» . -- _ I Ow II{NT e41t /N_ _ Tw-.N AOTWI11RLth1l �RMo aw rur N» e�-alal-ew-e� • 1INw _{•t[IAO tt.-»- OY��_ ►MA M_� G.-i[0-{a{-•0 Yc 2. ...... _ �nAWTO_ -OW11--»TAL 01t6-- ...-c[s .. .. •' t.IN.» eO I. TOTAL pow IMROW 11lmOVt [ tW 11 OLvzw / _I " _/� to TOTAL IOPERAT QVOL01.0 -- LIA.A eTOM TE TOTAL WpalmATER - - - - - - OPERATING • LIN.>f IUMD 13 TOTAL 10 0 UWE* QVE11 --RUMP r. TALL "Mi1MG ATIO GOLF COIRQ OI[R[Tlw RO •' - OI.=1.n TOTAL , - ....+.-w ...I.....a.., tea-_ .--...� ....:.':..,_ ocaric, I PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE 0 -a S - o V PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 1. .. V z. 3.AA^ 1. s. m3 Inlb 7. B. 9. 0. 1. I. J. 4. S. 6. 7. e. 9. 0. PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO C ou nc t'l MEETING DATE q -a5 - gA PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) L � a � Ri7i'i•�....b,� 1 : .1 Moslem G�f7s1!Til� .tA� ���• -r � ■L9:J� 45:it� i� �-�ris� ..I • � I I mmmum r:: a F CORM m Tot Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Prater John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director Dates April 13, 1988 Subject: County Road 15 - Progress Report On the above date, I attended the weekly Pre Con meeti regarding the construction of County Road 15. The initial start up began the week of April 1, 1988. The construction at this time is concentratea on the bearon Bridge with rerouting utility lines. There has been concrete sawing at culvert locations and tree and brush removal mostly in siring Park and Mound. At this date, there does not seem to be any construction scheduled for Orono for the next two to three weeks. cc: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members Building 6 Zoning Departments Police Department CO,AACIL 2�ct7 Aeul N, I'Al A%,YL bfAr Ole w roftmLlum . �ivasE aiW Ih (�k }WL ``QY2 fG1Np-a ADeal OA.wIdMwM,.a ba;M he— fmmt. ql n ba dNra.MM dl bern,mokmrl.x. M1r radi.rrn.va. rwm to uY' Mvltea. W `ib.. L lac. be Nmlrwgr Iu..mlr..N nR .ad tka l lua vrc ncEadt m Jr rods W In MrtM1 un, nb nT • envne ,n rVurP+ln, me He ' r of5, uxr 1 pdrw dfav r.up.t 4dry d he one e'de� 1.c in . M1nrvadrerm-..M., 'r n. the pucryy m oXn mr Jctl. 8e Cant km pd dhm my Mpm rr,unf end memp ,M 'tn} m .1 tatn FI MaMa.Mwn,earheddtr eeanf ddae Pnnrafrwnnbthe U.m I..d, e speeded Mn M1ras dyn m p ede maln d m Refuse ee - drr,. Wane ,rN . M1n aWn pd y n akn e+hn i ak - w elan{ t M1 .pe<deR. ",,n meni • rmRM %eh mndrme.nor DNI I dr tltr dctlrrl. tM1n vwL1 red— n e—hol rrkrcC beaW n v aheh... p do Peeve ntd .efy . 1 Rrou aFndr. m n Amhol . m v.Ye Tee, polkd hn Mm O av Mak %mcm d d Orono pal- deparme t bAvr he _h d eso wtrn .n 'smlm mt. lie an tl.n kn.a: Mabry r nrW 'll I awitl 1 drwv lQe y neat w -yy a yW re Y Arrp ' awedeenagq- eas.Ab brw he (Np .'.M1 pu eee.nn W p yr n ] avaee d mkr. Yv nW rte Y.r He. eve d tdamde Hvrpa WJdk<Wde w .wow. Mmrakd M.dmmep vr..rw.aMrn.rmw,ehi. de.d k,. .ISP a dw d rk Arerm ardf. klr.. .w,rai.r:1� p+ka vrar I.. pnee�d VOla v�wa- m•rlesd. Rea M.eFe.. wsiN.'IWhslw ar ddre aa. Mahei wn.aeted! eswhdb.pmnmai dw.M.da.. hdlduo may. N.]v v.rmyaa' Mwrrevrdi..wb leer ns rr.de Ile r.r de- Mnk.e .. t • ..li n . and r b f brl Aci b Fan rrakh.e. Hew S IIw 'Wlrtn.ew We b., m Rn . hr t. c maned. of krar Odin rtial�le�r` Mwr, ab A.aed la. dr .M. wearr band.a1.rA I Mint. ti.k.le ` Y manner- uuL..donv'. ueras Enron dot raeMderedev. m da(kono pdn yaw. (N Mam deunnaian. dthe nrornrr.,lek deA be dvl.AtnceaOenian .NMwM.raM Y'.aw drr�ai nrrm . aea b de ()re '4Rd.eug fr Y dl a. r W. Irmn hrai, pr+ d .a. a deae w rh a W r i da endear .�Jm e.dd ti .a rµ dkeed .a. Make, Idea lvrlaFr p. r eaaav ...d 4 . r.r.. l e W d .rr n ayplr.vi a" He ponbkr®rrr.rls'e r1 —eP Hews ra eyed r ewe.ve .nh kr... kdnR the dypad. Abi.. k rtNmdardAw x. hn. �rt� iD eYe . e.<e begs M • ]:.] •-r, •a ti _ vaPef .Mhdinl Wseantlwlam •vas PP. a Prrr.PPvv a PP a a a P. a a *.as a a..... Pvr PP0.PPVPPP• Alm.`�k°b° -aan i..r. rdery.. Eyes the Prize Ji.*dcwrt d.dv.F ldc ydebriea on '1 Spedraer;rr5vsa drd� ®-vlrAl .ri/nn py. nnnednA m, md.l.',devnd.nnY line. b: .;, .,nr kn.ar;r.1 ralred m. dNnam. Came v.da e.mdeWedrN M.laa. ,Al'A1n IYe Mrs mrdc. 1. mned;w.4 ke.,.. wlr dNbw.Mwr Wrw.a. vmArlyPrvr dun kamd..;Mdeprr esndb,ha.�.nrddeee- .re.n vaned .eMmendamNaakc �. .swdilaa urdQlrb rnq..A tre,pulmm� sd Yww. ad nraN roc.- •km .hev h.ppcn .nm inrMpYa.bvv. m hdh.— ned .r pdkr l.r.se.r YM.drr..r kh.d,l daal.InFdandF,rarrY ud. e, Am.. esmeced, nws The len r 1a vaned Peu.IlW.maveWmtn.l Sa derew m Fit/1 .y fM..ra n rh m.. Odry Mm f]rr 1 w and.— The M Fa ddad b, h-a Ord" a.rd Neyn.W.. v. Ma Send, ems[ Vnner redh9 . me ' rrrdr,erml.r.yf. fbm paved, ..a... y p.adwd Id.rd. Y YA. 1 .i1+, bi�(beA�y, �rlh.aMrsdrdr .1.ar. Ares i Allrr Ir��4q yssr wr Y BbeM.u. 4.Na Fwe Th ee..ceennic OreF .bre lei 1Fi.udv d de brk nde ,n,ed tk nevenv. lr ee hs mee - a .mppm r bew tM Sa,r. W Peard."aneacr,arl Pk^.0 mp.rr.Tkmrww• FM.�.w1 e-ne.esrr clad d.r hYrka.a.yd ;ndsrmrea.. pwdiaa, Yda YYr Y. 4ami Md dn.l Yi�.w }y•hi Ic.smA rllbrtw ft, W co nrotM:N � emerea Mn. {r[..Aiw pLrna lmm .Ae..�.h de...nmiw.i Iw wr r adder hrd r ...a de kale, r �.r. A . mr �i r 1.nelt W. rm „heo,he, . e N, ed ¢ame ..I We yuu.. it,,, ya..c �,+ , yi. . , I heh nkvtkadrihed,vi dav then ,hey enter,,, the ,.,he, ,porn — a h'.kmgi defadox ,hampum I.. A. James in Whets and lbuandoun Ioxel mad. a %whRhn, at it.Rp+li Col- Hipken hirel appuunce — u,it 1 1,,w, 4,94.,he Mroach, are ” k s, really never thought .A I,,nedtha O,,uva y ,elate he ,urti of ,h- !• ...... m.pincn." utould vularde IirWly and vie +ulkrball tecuJ thi. sun +a+l &Kbayl .ldavoul audar could be able m...... he 91 and we only .n-hsB 9— Itll J&a But vonvc Am on baseball +ea+.n .rth a behind the Glst-place wrmkrwhaethenun+berrtne minimum of hank,+.Vs. STarbli tut vitro am 111.6 over and numbs no A.L. mokin Not so. On Friday, the th.e lam too yeas. .o'g2l Hrbhviatnumbermol I.in, ..If NMNMe the ap- Ihe MOnaehf mue Agm have ROM IMe. peaame ul ,he Rally R.R. fu- lead the feaRue .n anemLncs. "I have been surprised. mg the firs, fluttering salvo in nrrapng just over 2.000 a s..mcrhat surprised, that u ha appear+ to be a revved match this vela aM`are led by RVI m his non ee ban able to m pmeawral.nslaugbu. 'IhC . RµylrtafealttW k oo JGdfdµ tape Another step fooroard. and M.WW...11,oumer by sn— festive .0230 kills. L..A..IB erainly surprised that he has ung up booths for hanky be hampered Ssturdn by the not been able to hold his paraphernalia (core- has of former Olympian flab- wouMrheseheanrhrnbe nmm..... vc h.nklef. pro. be Green. uho is lour month, o as ll vcrs old. I don't know bably, akng'xith their nevi preforant and hasbecnordcral uhv.v RolJembossed hmk.ec all bvthele gu ormnuttherat Oo Hrbek:'HrbclthudoM the spa AI limited edition ul the sn,em lot health essentially that I shay+ Nickw hank) amen broad reasomi thoulds he xould d.. I never oveld-0I on cytty game day m vela Hthek avast all in. But April. The OtherBpimgTraaniml ! look at the end of the veer and The"r..n+, rem Gopher football coach Job. xe he, gat 70 anke,vese, rye had mush ome m,all, sbout n Omel u s, has had a steak m nay e, u.dos,.od has . 1.9 fall• but they vere shmew a•rmyfn'88 µuaJbutmlr, 11w only.n he could have ofthe.hukhardtyhyp.in'R;. mv..v,hehloca.hahcyay. hats car.nnd he. as urea Fly, Sol pvc MapLAW 'll+sttll tak,ml,hape:heuyf. ,hose pya xho pis, stayed ha, IlaxbWl a pone, of the par I..• -But .e should he baser dw ill the urrc. like Ale BuRp, de bWlelub thin made .t all ver.' Mtha, arsn, arm msnya p. isahk p. nmhm, Sort, rim The lineb.okcr .,p. a ,have? valh ill ;his ury. n,ryl that tAld. • oh,aurnag kaermen .ould not he re.hed for coon- may not be adios- bls a me m. has Oruro paste, chel evalaae, a el aly %1.t, that ddn'I u an, mlwv dro, leadve Melvin Kilo demed that the Moran mnde,heufler dny police colic My hei sup .Mid.m ever torok place, past the .harps and p.vtµ Related I ,Ik in a private 'We, e,en, uv.rµ ,o ,hem the money if Mahe,, umAd ,m atµaws. hamtu du Amtbm,,. he stall .",- ae mthe,lrutbua. Later that arc nonR N kW.a made. cenaNv Mahevi, ultimately refused Alahe., phoned Offs. .o ,+tine, •a ofili. We ,he .flat katng the Orow Man, vih. ,epsaed the oat- eased him .f he Is. ati A. department 1. land far fer. And s.aunfa nby of . ho"it drop. rod be stated mall An the business of boosµ ,nR Moth .11I.000 for every, mNmRtriff. e. Idmitknov. . r.m,nW,. b arathecharps wise of ocure hepeve'ha- than bsnvii acre. hen xc aga,nvt MashA.I An. Ad . Marhrvisvad,harhedd.', 'etosidv'Id., rifler him any he has already.. hasleenve know .nyme vib„ a,ld r,r .,eri of drtpp,.R the bit and .A m 1..awn em , ire. but Moran said that .he sbrRn ap,rnt him. kph 19 m sae the chsrRn of Ill., vsvlvc had then own Mahsvis. husoever, raid- DWI, speedo AM poseslud e.d A/ahcxs could cJ ,he ,.nyc,,.roo with ,pooafma,t. foRuvi up .in those M,n.n Moran t ar dsim h ihellp! = lui;-Mill Q Which ilsins' paseha teentded the most racmrie, iu '47. Q Which M1aaa playa lad the vas is t siv, - S,.a. is" Fete ut{U.LyL RVl3s 1* dis"Rirl ran Para,{ nail W •,r..... sits Faavasarpr.r.ar r.aaars elmin r,n w�rr awe. seatae..s,aavr tivti a.®yWts n fear. nv Iia.., yndOle r w . v ta....ylva'. Mwrwlnual�l viva viyu,m, a....a •.. try ara.vs... nr.l fats. a • V) rl'IIIN.Ve n rR(YfSy11y Pea � rat r r MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE SCHOOL BOAkO OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278 HELD ON MARCH 14, 1988 The regular meeting of the School Board of Orono Independent School District No. 278 was held on Monday, March 14, 1988. Present: Dave McKown James Franklin Thomas Mich Don Anderson John Maresh William Fenho:t Kitty Crosby Lucie Taylor UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the consent agenda was approved as follows: - approved the minutes of the February 22, 1988 regular meeting; - approved the spring Quarter course offerings for Orono Fnrly Childhood Family Education; - approved variance requests for Michael yukelich, grade 5, and Barry Espiritu, grade 10, to ,,omplete the 1987-88 school year at Westonka Schools; - granted approval for Glenn Sibley, grade 11, to complete his education at Orono Schools; - approved the appointment of Robert Weeda as part-time custodian at Orono Middle School effective February 22. 1988; - approved the Treasurer's Report for January, 1938; - approved the bills as covered by vouchers 058615 through 058743 and 057910 through 058011; - approved the minutes of the Board Workshop, February 22. 1988. Dr. Mich reported that conferences had been held this past week for elementary, intermediate and middle schools with high attendance by parents; that on Saturday, March 12, Early Childhood Family Education sponsored mn open house at Schumann Elementary School; that the breakfast with legislat- s will be held tomorrow, March 15; that Paul Ratwik will spesk on Least Restric. ive Environment and recent due process hearings an Tuesday, March 15 at Westonka District Office at 2:30 p.m.; that in the STAR/TRIBUNE last Thursday, March 10, there were wri- tings of Orono students; that administration was pleased with the turnout for the Quest meeting for 6th and 7th grade nts; that he wishe' thank Bi 11 Fenholt and Norma Franklin for all thei cork in establish' viding the option of ,utomatic deposit for employees, that the followir- h school stu- dents will be participating in the family study experience to Wesc Germany and will be leaving March 15 - Wendy Gabriel, Carnlyn Gray, Diana Lee, Stephanie March, Andrew Mechav' Allison Morgan sad Allison Rice; that Aaron Kyllander, Lisa Zumbusch, Kevin endeal, Nick Coult, anc Erik Brown will leave on March 27 to study in Germs. . a more extended time, 3 - 4 months; that there were copies av,ilable toniy.. if the appraisal on the property that the Board had been looking at; that Woods Academy's last sayment was about 30 days late buf payment has been received. Don Ande [quested clarification as to class size comparisons with regard to the ECSU Size report. Administration will provide this information at a later o•te. Lucie Taylor stated that she was pleased with the evaluations of the Elements of Effective Instruction Workshop held on February 29 and March 1 and commended Dr. Mich for his work in this area. Mrs. Taylor also expressed appreciation tc Dr. w for his work/leadership on the Education Leadership Day held on Marri- L In conjunction with the Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce. Dr. Mich updated .ie Board regarding the long-range planning process stating that administration will b?gin reviewing the curriculum identification forms this week; that he was pleased with the Elements of Effective Instruction Workshop and he will be meeting with Sue Sjeklocha to discuss ways of offering this workshop to other staff members on a voluntary basis; that they have available tonight the land appraisal and that the community must be made aware of the area of facility needs and he has begun that process through his article in the March NEWSLETTER. Lucie Taylor MOVED, Kitty Crosby seconded, to mend the resolution rrlating to *smoke -free" schools adopted at the February 8, 088 meeting to read a,i follows: That the Board of Education declare the buildings of Orono Schools to be "smoke -free* effective Au ust 29 1988 for the follcw.,g reasons in priority order: 1) the health o�smokers.-27 modeling behavior of lndivz9wls within a school setting, 3) concern for the smoker; and that the Board further directs administration to study and recommend a smoking cessation program: for voluntary employee participation; and that the board further directs administration to develop and recommend a more formal and detailed policy in accordance with this directive. Lucie Taylor stated that since the initial adoption of this policy, she has taken the time to review/study informatio.. received from experts/companies that have established "smoke -free" environments and this information points out that setting a March timeline is too soon for the policy to be successful. She further explained that, in her opinion, the most et. dive uay to resolve the situation and to allow the necessary time for implementation of the policy would be to change the date of implementation to August 29, 1988. Discussion ensued with opinir 'reasons stated in favor of maintaining the March timeline as well as opinions/reasons stated In favor of establish', the August timeline. Concern was expressed regarding the grounds issue and .,,, this Is an area that will alsu need to be addressed. The question was called on the se: rent to the resolution. Nay: Jim Fran,:in, Dave McKown. Motion carried. Karen Orcctt, Special Education Director, introduced Nancy Johnson and Chris Locker, teachers in the early childhood spec'al education program at Schumann. Elementary. 'as. Johnson and Ms. Locker presented the Board with a., i•erview of this program and the •tudents they serve. Ms. Orcutt commended will Nancy Johnson an, Chris Locket the excellent .lob they do to keeping these students on task. Ms. Orcutt also provided the dwrd with detailed information on the leglslatDnssed last spring that will tare effect in July and the impact th 3'slation will hav- Jn Orono's program. UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seronded by Lucie Taylor, thn substitute teacher salary schedule will be increased from f55 to $60 daiiy for 1-10 consecutive workdays and from $60 to $70 daily for 11-29 consecutive workdays, commencing with the 1988-89 school year. Lynda Meador introduced Nancy Brantingham from the Chemical Health Advisory Committee and in her presentation she provided background information re ardi" the development of the Orono Chemical Health Policy/Student Assistance Progrw.. as well as seminars/programs that the committee will be providing for parental information/awareness. Other members of this committee were also present to answer questions/provide clarification reyarding this policy. As a result of the discussion of tl.is policy, it was agreed at Dr. Mich will meet with Lynda Meador for the purpose of merging the proposed Orono Chemical Health rol'cy and the proposed Student .Assistance Program into a Chemical Health Policy, with the student assistance program being an approach to implc,nent the policy. The Board of Fducmtion recently ticipated in the completion of individual learning styles profiles, and Ka,e.. Orcutt was present to discuss/explain the individual learning styles profiles. At some time in the future, use of the learning styles profiles will be implemented in the district and the Board's n!rticipation in this-xercise provided them with first-hand informatic^'knowledge in this area. UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Jim Franklin, the meeting was adjourned. 1 KathetinA P. Crosby. Lierk Approved: SaDQveCKown,aano�n' City of Oronc Public Notice Lead in Drinking Witter The purpose of this notice is threefold: first, to address the potential health effects of lead; second to indicate possible sources of lead in your drinking water; and third, what you can do to minimize your exposure to lead in your drinking water if a lead source is present. Lead has been commonly used in the manufacture of products in our society, including gasoline, paints, batteries and glass windows, to name a few. Lead is known to cause health problems if consumed or inhaled. Your local water system, the- Minnesota Department of health, and United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are concerned about lead in drinking water. To date, no beneficial effects of lead in humans have been found. Because lead accumulates in the body, the health effects depend upon the level and duration of exposure to the lead sources. Too much lead in the human body can cause damage to the brain, nervous system, blood -forming processes, gastro-intestinal systems and kidneys. The greatest risk, even with short-term exposure, is to young children and pregnant women. Lead in our environment is a public health issue about which we should all be concerned. There are two pathways for lead to enter the body. They are ingestion and inhalation. One possible source of ingestion of lead is your drinking water. In 1974, the United °fates Congress passed the Safe Drinking Water Acl. (SDWA). The SDWA requires the U.S. EPA to protect the public health by setting drinking water standards for public water supplies. The EPA anci othtrs have determined that lead is a health concern at certain levels cf exposure. The current standard set by the U.S. EPA is a maximum of 50 parts per billion. This standard will likely be lowered significantly, based on new health information of high risk groups. Part of the purpose of this notice is to inform you of the potential adverse health effects of lead. THIS IS BEING DONE EVEN THOUGH YOUR WATER MAY NOT BE IN VIOLATION OF THE CURRENT STANDARD. Lead rarely occurs naturally in drinking water. The principal source of lead, when present in drinking water, is from lead -based solders or lead pipe in the plumbing of homes or residences. Frcm the late 1800', to about 1930, lead was a common material used for water service pipe and interior plumbing. Since this time, other materials such as copper and galvanized steel pipe have been used more extensively in residential plumbing systems. Lead -based solders were commonly used to join copper pipe. SINCE JUNE 1, 1985, THE STATE OF MINNESOTA HAS BANNED THE USE OF LEAD PIPE AND SOLDERS OR FLUXES CONTAINING MORE THAN 0.2 PERCENT LEAD TO BE USED IN ANY PLUMBING INSTALLATION WHICH CONVEYS A POTABLE WATER SUPPLY. Lead from pipes and lead -based solders enters the drinking -rater through corrosion. Water is an excellent solvent; therefore, when w,+,er stands in the pipes of a residence for several hours without use, there is a greater Potential for lead to enter the drinking water, if a lead source is present. Other factors that may increase the lead levels in household drinking water include: Age and condition of household plumbing or water service pipes. Naturally soft water can be more corrosive; and, therefore, creates the potential for higher lead levels. In general, water in Minnesota tends to be hard or scale forming. Some home water treatment systems, including home water softeners, may make the water more corrosive. Hot water dissolves lead from pipe and lead -based solders more quickly than cold water. IN SUMMARY, LEAD LEVELS IN YOUR DRINKING WATER ARE. LIKELY TO BE HIGHEST IF: 1. Your home has copper pipes with lead solder joints, or 2. Your home or water system has lead pipes and: a. if water sits in pipes for several hours, or b. if you have soft or corrosive water, or C. if the home is less than five years old. NOTE: Water service pipes and interior potable water distribution piping in all buildings %onstructed after June 1, 1985 should not contain lead pipes nor should lead -based solders hav-_ been used in joining copper pipe. If you are unsure if lead is present in your household plumbing or water service lines, you should either ccntact your local water utility or a qualified plumber to make this determination. It is not pose ble to see dissolved lead in drinking water. The only way to measure the lead level present in your drinking water is to have the water analyzed by a qualified laboratory. The laboratory will provide you with the sample bottle and instructions on hcw to take a water sample. If you have your water tested and high levels of lead are found, or if you t,elieve that you have lead -based materials in your home or water service, there are WAYS TO MINIMIZE THE. EXPOSURE TO THESE. LEAD MATERIALS. Do not consu;-re or cook with water that has been in contact with your home's plumbing for more than a few hours. 4 o Before using this water for consumption or cooking, "flush" the cold water faucet by allowing the water to run until you feel. a temperature change. This temperature change should occur in 2-3 minutes. If you suspect or know that your home has a lead service pipe or connection, allow the water to run an additional 15-30 seconds to be sure the service line is "flushed" also. o Do not cook or drink water from a hot water tap. As previously mentioned, lead dissolves faster in hot water than cold water. If hot water is needed, use the cold water tap and heat water on the stove. o Use only the cold water faucet to prepare baby formula. Always "flush" the cold water faucet as described above before preparing any formula. o Use only lead-free materials for any repair work to be done. THIS IS STATE LAW. In 1984, the Minnesota Department of Health completed a survey of lead in drinking water in buildings less than three years old. The results of this survey indicated that the source of lead found in the drinking water was from the buil:�J_nq plumbing systems. The survey also demonstrated that "flushing" the water tap reduced the lead to levels well below the drinking water standard. The findings of this survey prompted legislation to be enacted in 1985 which prohibits the use of lead pipes, lead -based solders or fluxes to be used in any plumbing installation which conveys a potable water supply. The City of Orono has completed testing of lead levels in the municipal water supply and have determined that the ie,=c levels are far below the allowable amounts. If you have any questions regarding information contained in this notice, please contact John Gerhardson at 473-7357. The U.S. EPA has a toll -free hotline number dedicated to the subject of lead in drinking water. The telephone number is 1-800-426-4791. The U.S. EPA has also prepared a brochure on the subject. Please publish in the Laker and Pioneer newspaper on each h fallowing weeks: April 18, 1988 May 16, 1988 June 20, 1988 3 COUNCK. Mq fiN6 P,Pr, 2 519i 3 CITY OF ORONO Special goose hunt in metro area exceeded expectations, said DNR Riches, Excelsior, ►met Green and laid, "Local con- 4nufacturers, deal- resentatives have in donating excep- • first bonef►t." he S15 per Peron tinresota Architee- ^holar- hips and ed- f. The public is In - tons may t- made l iins board i ere. Cargill" senior -orporate affair, has he company't< Board ned CargtU's law de - is operations fupe1 it the Public Affairs irh Includes govern- mblicationf, Comm i- ,cwporate marketin q ion*, media relation `f information center•. his home in Orono I ! fe,stures inn More than 4,100 t ese were harvested al in the first of last year's two spec goose huntr in the metro area, which was twice the number hoped for by DNR wildlife officials. The hunts were held to control the number of geese in the region, where flocks have grown fo large as to cause problems for muni- cipal►tie Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Metro Area Wildlife Supervi- sor Roger Johnson said the successful hunt probably did not reduce the total population of roughly 25,000 geese in ,he area, but did help check its growth. Results from the second special hunt are being tabulated. The fpec►al hunts were held in addition to the regular waterfowl feason, which traditionally has a negligible Impact on the total number of geese in the region. "The numbe- of geese taken in the first special hunt showf the hunt was M.,wnai Blister of ,�;,e ChelrtR,pM►er inn In a< a it defem'? the well accepted the the birds were vul- nerable, as we had hoped;' said John- son. "Additionally, there were no stg- nificant hunter- landowner conflicts. Based on these results, the DNR w111 plan similar hunts for the fore eeable future in order to control the goose population." One special hunt has now been set for Sept. I through 10, 198(1, to take place on certain public and private lands throughout the seven -county metropolitan area. The boundaries will be the same as last year's. John- son said the registration process will be different, with more information on that to come this summer. In addition to special hunts to con- trol the goon a population, the DNR will be conducting goose roundups again In several cities in coordination with the University of Minnesota. Orono Fire Rescue From Page S oft wife, Lucille, and Reveral other people outside. pointing to the north end of the house. By the time Officer Morowczynrki irrived a couple of minutes later, the tire war already sending a plume of moke into the sky that could be `een for more than a Hole. Tomcheck had *,ready made two iearchef of the i...... ., et3►-inwinit to locale Viltuft, went next and them pulled out Tom - check, who had breathed to a lot o' smoke. Oxygen was; administered to Tome heck by emergency personnel on the scene. He was taken to a nearby hos petal, treated for carbon dioxide in the blood and released. Der pate their quick action during the life -threatening emergency, both uffi- cerf were nonchalant about the ref cue. "They're making a big deal out of northing," ►aid Morowctynrki of the media and public attentiow i , April 11, 1988 Hon. Owen Smaby, Mayor Long Lake City Offices Long Lake, MN 55356 Dear Mayor, I have lived in Long Lake for almost three years. As a homeowner, my experiences with the Orono Police Department have been exceptional and warrant recognition. Although these experiences may seem trivial, as a single mother of two, the Orono Police have made a big difference to me. Whether it was late, loud music across the street in Holbrook Park or kids scaring my latch -key children after school, response time, attitude and courtesy have been top-notch. Most recently, I participated in the Orono Police Ride -Along program. I rode with Larry Tomcheck on Saturday, April 9th. I was impressed with his professionalism, awareness, attention to detail and his tolerance for my endless questions. While at the station, I met several other officers who carried the same positive attitudes. The program is a real eye-opener and I appreciated the opportunity to participate in it. All too often, we see police officers from a distance -- as though they aren't people. Unapproachable, no sense of humor and scarey are a few of the stereotypes that come to mind. Exactly the opposite iF true of these fine individuals. Thank you for your attention to this letter. Please pass my appreciation on to the appropriate people. Sincerely, Debra Wright 296 Inglewood St. Long Lake, MN 55356 cc: Melvin Kilbo, Chief of Police WEST SUB URBAN, MEDIATION CENTER 32 Tenth Avenue South, Suite 211, Hopkins, April 4, 1988 Dear Mayor and members of the City Council: We appreciate your support of the West Suburban Mediation Center in 1988. To report on our activities, an annual report for 1987 and an invitation to our annual meeting on May 12th`will be mailed in the next few weeks. First quarter highlights are: 0005 1. 27 cases have been referred (a 59% increase over the first quarter of 1987) representing 82 individuals. The cities represented by individuals are: Bloomington (6); Brooklyn Center (2); Chanhassen (1); Coon Rapids (1); Edina (8); Golden Valley (4); Hopkins (16); Inver Grove Heights (1); Minneapolis (8); Minnetonka (7); Plymouth (2); Richfield (3); St. Louis Park (23). 2. Recruited and elected four new board members 3. 7 minute inservice training audio-visual cassette available on loan for usage by city staff and police officers 4. Presentation to Fennepin County Juvenile Advisory Committee 5. Metro -wide cable channel ( +)resentation for "Bloomington Today" 6. Brochure designed and printed 7. Adult and juvenil- referral forms prepared and printed The news media has printer' article:; on the use of mediation recently (i.e., teacher's strike in F.k River) but wide acceptance by the public and referral sources for community mediation programs is still needed. We would appreciate your assistance in publicizing our services in your community. We also would welcome applicants for the Board. Nine new volunteers are taking initial training in April. The March 1988 newsletter from the Conflict and Change Center, HHH Center, University of Minnesota, has an article on a study of a victim -offender mediation program in Minneapoli:?. Excerpts from the article: "One of the advantages of mediation is that it i:; an opportunity for victim participa�ion. This humanizes conflict and mean: that victims are less likely to feel they have been treated only as objects by the cric,inal justice system." We offer victims an opportunity to confront the offender whl�-h is different from most other diversion programs. "The idea that mediation is nonbinding is a problem to some, but how does that compare to the pcssibil.ity that a jury may not understand the issues involved in a particular case." "...oi,e (process) is fast and the other slow." Looking forward to a successful partnership thi, ' Sinrerely, r Sue Nelson Executive Director SN!pk Y/ei(e1N(D eoUNDAeY r r %4WE U 81988 MIIVNEHAHA CREEK (M WATERSHED DISTRI P.O. Box 387, 55391 t Mi t Wa zaa. Minnesota i MIMM(f0i1 efY[e BOAAD Of IWAXALM Camille 0 Andre. Ra • AlW L. Lehman • John E Thomas James R SpeMley • Richard R MAkr . ROW D Erickson • C Woodrow love April 15, 1988 Mr. Arthur Finkelstein 1740 Shadywood Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Re: Lake Minnetonka Water Levels Dear Mr. Finkelstein: I have received correspondence and a memorandu,lifrom the City of Orono wherein are discussed your concerns about the recent fluctuations in the eater levels of Lake Minnetenka. I am available to discuss the District's operating policy for the headwaters control structure (HWCS; at -Grays Bay or other issues of interest to you during normal business hours at our office located at 545 Indian Mound in Wayzata. Enclosed is a copy of the HWCS Operating Policy for your review. Please contact me at 473-4224 to set a meeting time or if you require any additional information. Sincerely, EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for the District J es J. ady, Engin bt cc: Board L. -Smith #: Bernhardson, Orono JIM '111LnN, President RI(h CHl'BH, Nice President Jl STINE GOl 1.U. Treasurer Corcoran Maple Grove Msple Grove 420-2270 533-5%4 420-4057 DIRECTORS: Hennepin County Agricultural Sponsor of the Annual Coun ► Farr PAT COOK, Secretary - Corcoran, MN 55340 9437 Csin Road Tel. (612) 420-3539 March 1988 TO: Mayors and City Councils of H FROM: Pat Cook, County Fair Secretary SUBJECT: Hennepin County "Olde Tyme" Fair This year we are again holding the Hennepin County A\D) ROZEHOOM "011ie Tyme" Fair at Corcoran Lions Park, and we know it Maple Gro%c will be even better than last year's Fair. We 559-2989 appreciated the support of the municipalities last year, and we'd like to seek your support again this year. We A1'%* HEIDI'MAN are asking for your support in two areas: 1)a donation Long lake and 2)your support in gettinq the word out about the 473-558N Fair. PAUI SCHUTTE The Hennepin County "Olde Tyme" Fair will again resemble Corcoran an old-fashioned county fair with a rural settinq (see enclosed map) . Features of the Fair include carnival I ORA1 \ Z.ACHMAN rides, grandstand shows, cotton candy, open class and Roger% 4-11 exhibits and animals and lots more. You'll be 42h 24IsiS especially interested to know that one addition this KA1H1 CAI\ wear is a donk-y race, pitting m-eyors o cities against one anot hHr . Corcoran 420-2927 ,e need t ,. n order to a�_hies our goals we r. d h cooperation of 1I0RFNCFI.ARSO\ all the Hennepin County cities. PINmuuth 1. We are sugg,-sting a small donation based on your 546-2945 population as follows: 100-2510 residents--$25.00 MEMBER OF' 2500-10,000 residents--$50.00 ADVISORY BOARD 10,000-25,000 residents--,100.00 $25,000-50,000 residents--S200.00 F.F. ROBB. IR Over 50,000 residents--$300.00 County (ommi•.uoner 2. We also request your cooperation in getting the word RANDY JOII\\I,' out to your cities through city newsletters, posters, Counts Coninii,N wi newspapers, utility billings, etc. I am enclosing a release that I would urge you to use in your ci+.y's 1.11161) it DF newslpttor. A representative from the Fair Board will lcnatur4'44hDistim be contAC ting yo!1 within three weosks to deterrstne your JI!v: KFMP newsletter schedule and supply you with additional Minn I o Sersicc - Hrnn ('(, information you may need as well as posters and flyers. \\ I � R01 III k i Thank you very much for your coopera r ion and support. Pis--c 1sith your help w? can miKe the H-nnepin County "Olde ,Tyme" Fair a huge success. A\\1 AI NI \\►Pit (IN \11 ► AI* A! (001( (NI Al I,AIh Pest - s(aa me, IUI •m] IN owl, `A 2% 1v and 11 IW> i For immediate release j FAIR PLANNING, SPACE RENTAL BEGINS ! .I Individuals, businesses, and groups wishing to rent space at the 1988 Hennepin County "Olde Tyme" Fair, July 28-31, should act tt now, according to Jim Milow, who was newly elected to head this 1 year's Fair. Renters from previous years should have received this year's information, and space is rented on a first -come basis. Renters may choose either .ndoor o, outdoor space, whi--h is priced by the running foot. For more information about s rental or the 1,iir, call Linda at 42'-2270. Past renters havo included a r;idt• variety of crafts people, businesses, service companies or organizations, and food concessionaires. The "Olde Tyne" Fair is patterned after early county fairs, and will include a.namGer of neh attractions this ye-ir. Donkey races, pittin:1 mayors of the nunir.ipalities against eacr, other, are expected to be a biq hit, says Milow, who also plans to half donkey heats featuring area sports figures and media persinalities. The competition is re^iniscen- of early f.-,irs in the County, when mayors of the municl.palities competed in the Hennepin County's "Olde Tyme" Fair is croanl=e-: by n volunteer group, who are always looking for other interested residents to �. help out. For more information, call Jim Milow at 420-2270 or }ail 1'r�:relary k'st IUUA at 410-35+8• - 30-; Contacts Lynn Madsen 522-2942 i 420.2 TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator FROM: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director DATE: April 19, 1988 SOBJ: Progress Report - County Road 15 Reconstruction On the above date, I attended the -eekly preconstructions meeting regarding County Road 15. The majority of the work is in Spring Park and Mound at this time. There has been concern by the contractors that the speed limit be reduced. Hennepin County has requested a speed study be performed by the Minnesota Dept. of Transporation. Effective April 20, 1988, the Seton Channel bridge will th, restricted to 10.5 feet per driving lane. Fight -of -way acquisition is still in progress in Orono. Next meeting will be Tuesday, April 26, 1988, at 10:30 A.M_ LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT A G E N D A Regular Meeting 7:30 p.m., Wednesday, April 27, 1988 TONKA BAY VILLAGE HALL 4901 Manitou Road (County Road 19), Tonka Bay 1. Management Plan Advisory Cosmittee - 5 p.m. 2. Pudic Hearings - 7tOO p.m.: A. Niccum Development - New Dock License B. QB I1 - Liquor License 3. Call to Order - 7:30 p.m. 4. Roll Call 5. Minutes: March 23, 1988 6. Financial Condition_: A. Monthly Financial Report B. Bills C. 1987 Financial Statement 7. Public Comments: Non -Agenda Item:, 8. Committee Reports A. Water Structures 6 Environment Cosslittee (1) Committee Report (a) Public Hearing Report - Waterford Properties (b) License Amendment - Rockvam Boat Yards (c) Public Hearing Report - St. Albans Bay Marina (d) of"It- Lakeshore Village Apts. (e) 1988 Dock Licenses (f) Future Public Hearings (q) Inspection Reports/Refunds (h) Smith's Bay Marina Order (i) Slip Size Review (1) Environment (k) Other LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Agenda April 27, 1989 Page 2 8. A. Water Structures 6 Environment Committee (cont) (2) Committee Action (a) License Amew:mtnc - Rockvam Boat Yards (b) Lakeshore Village Apartments Dock License (c) 1988 Dock License Renewals (d) Slip Size Policy (e) Other (3) Other B. Lake Use Committee (1) Committee Report (a) Special Event Permits - New (b) Special Event Per -nits - Renewals (c) Public Hearing Report: Executive Charters Liquor License (d) Charter Boat Registrations (e) Future Public Hearings (f) Inspection Reports/Refunds (g) Water Patrol Report (h) Other (2) Committee Action (a) Sp. Event Pet -mite - New (b) It - Renewals (c) Liquor License - Executive Charters (3) Other 9. Code Amendment: Recodified Code 10. District Ordet: Smiths Bav Marina Variance and New Dock License 11. Other Business A. Public Relations Consultant B. Resolution - Corporate Authorization C. Other i2. Ad,lournment_ 11-88 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION D'STRICT REGULAR MEETINC TONKA MAY VILLAGE HALL March 23, 1988 The regular meeting of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District CA11.'IO was called to order by Chairman Rascop at 7:45 p.m. on Wednesday, ORDER March 23, 1988 at the Tonka Bay Village Hall. Members present: Richard Garwood (Deephaven), Carl Weisser (Excel- A'l'TENDANCF. sior), Jan Boswinkcl (Minnetonka Beach), John Lewman (Minnetrista), Tom Reese (Mound), Robert Rascop (Shc-ewood), Ron Kraemer (Spri- Park), and Robert Slocum (Woodland). Communities represented: Eight 18). MINUTES: Reese Moved, Boswinkel Seconded that the minutes of the MINUTES February 24, 1988 meeting be approved as amended. M -3n, Ayes 181, Nays 10). TREASURER'S REPORT: Slocum Moved, Boswinkel Seconded that the Treas- TREASURER'S urer's Report be approved and the bills paid. Motion, Ayes 181, REPORT Nays 101. PUBLIC COMMENTS: ho non -agenda items. WATER STRUCTURES_ 6 ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE: Reese Moved, Kraemer Seconded that th•! committee report be approved. Motion, Ayes 181, Nayf 101. , Weisser Moved, Reese Seconded that the City of Mound dock license MOUND apilication be backlicensed for 587 boats to 1985, that Mou:,d be LICENSES di ected to pay the full Water Storage Units for 1988 and 1987, that the fee differential for 1986 and 1985 be waived, and that the matter be subject to documentation and legal review. Motion, Ayes 181, N4ys 101. Boswinkel Moved, Garwood Seconded that the 1988 renewal dock license VETS application for Big Island Veteran Camp be approved, subject to LICENSE Orono's requirements. Motion, Aves 1R1, Nays (0). Slocum Moved, Weisser Seconded that the Rockvam request for a deicing ROCKVAM extension to include the former Greenhouse Eatery property be denied. DEICING Motion, Ayes 151, Nays 131, Boswinkel. Kraemer and Reese voting Nay. Reese Moved, Boswinkel Seconded that license amendments for drystack DRYSTACK storage at Rockvam Boat Yards and North Shore Drive Marina be ap- APPROVALS proved. Motion, Ayes 181, Nays 10). LAKE USE COMMITTEE: Reese :coved, Boswinkel Seconded that the minutes of the '.ake Use `Committee be approved, including the Charter Boat Registration for QE ll. Motion, Ayes 181, Nays 101. Reese Moved, Boswinkel Seconded that renewal Special Event Permit EVENT applications for the Lower Lake Consolidated Race Schedule, the Upper PFRMiT Minnetonka Race Schedu:e, and the April Holiday -Johnson crappie con- APPROVALS test be approved. Motion, Avea 181, Nays 101. LMCD Board Minutes 2 March 23, 1988 Reese Moved, Kraemer Seconded that the County lake Maintenance COUNTY Program and the County lake Improvement Program be approved. Motion, PROGRAMS Ayes 181, Nays 101. Garwood Moved, Slocum Seconded that Special Event inspection reports DEPOSIT be approved and the fee deposits refunded for the Wayzata Chamber REFUNDS of Commerce (Chilly Open), and Lord Fletchers (broomball). Motion, Ayes 181, Nays 101. The Water Patrol reported that: accidents on the Lake for 1987 were WATER down because of shallow water and additional enforcement; cleanup PATROI. at channels were being made with the DNR; spot-checking the Lake REPORT via Air Patrol may not adapt well over water; and "cigar boats" ap- parently 'nva left Lake Minnetonka - it is reported that they are on other lakes now. CODE _AIMENUMENTs Garwood Moved, Boswit:kel Seconded that the final RECODIFICATI vote on recodification be postponed until Reese and the attorney arrive at a consensus, a meeting with Rascop to be held on April 8. Motion, Ayes 171, Nays 111, Slocum voting Nay. DISTRICT ORDERS_: Weisser Moved, Boswinkel Seconded that Surfside's SURFSI08 1987 and 1988 dock license applications be denied. Motion, Ayes LICENSR 181, Nays [0). DENIALS Weisser Moved, Lewman Seconded that the Rockvam Order, Page 3, Item ROCKVAM 8 be changed by removing "suitable power," and that the complete ORDER line read, "kishrng boat rental of six boats and three motors." AMENDED Motion, Ayes 18), Nays 101. Rei-+e Moved, Kraemer Seconded that the Rockvam Order be approved ROCKVAM as amended. Motion, Ayes 181, Nays 10). ORDER OTHER BUSINESS. Metropolitan Council meetings have been postponed MET until April when a report is expected to be submitted to the Council COUNCIL, on LMCD's implementation of the Met Task Force recommendations. A letter should be directed io the Met Chai: and others responding to the anticipated report, and requesting Met support. Weisser Moved, Slocum Seconded that upon recomisendation of the Advi- COMPREHENSIV sory Committee, the proposal for _he development of a Comprehensive MANAGEMENT Plan for the Management of Lake Minnetonka be awArded to Arndorfer/- PLAN TO Barr. Motion, Ayes 181, Nays )O1. ARNDORFER ADJOURNMENT: Boswinket Moved, Reese Seconded at 8:55 p.m. that Lite ADJOCTI '> meeting be adjourned. Motion, Ayes 161, Nays 101. Submitted byr Carl H. Weisser, Sec►etary Approved by r ___ Robert Rascop, Chairman t f _ 910 9!0 r \ •ei+ f 7 NIA l j •Nr �� :� V 1 •`` _ qr I\• � I •. zy � L >j I �� z(oeo e7 oL..ores E�ev�t,o•+a 67 I M K 4 e.• a-zsn� _j • 1.-G��sf 5 Law�go zec+c AgtOW 9Si LeuTw7V 1•z. 4�. ( _ \� 14'e.M.9- T- P 1 PRINTED 91" MAR30M McCOMBSPAW yso ROOS ASSOC. - - -.� Le.q..e 7lveuoc nzc_.nuv Je.s.-• �i PRODoSED DRIVEWA�f McCOMBS KNUTSON ASSOCIATES INC �j ae lo., 1, ESQ I, 0IZ01d0 c-"y- 8161711/III/23 Eh]- Co"cl I M4 ADVANCE SURVEYING! ENGINEEM 1258 (4-0_�v w11 �b. �e.A.. w1�...r.RN wR r DN: JOHN EHLi SCBYEYEL. Auqust 18, 1987 DRAam sept-bst 1, 19B7. N[VrfED: F.M.ay 24,ife8 REVIBEp� YFrtx LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 19, i9N. Lets 9 end 10, COTFEL'B ADDITION TO BHADY HOOD, Hsnnspin County, NinnBAotA PGIlB: r ra.�M a pawn • rxY.w utl xr • r:W ea,w: r>�r �.. a am...,e.,in.n. �w >•e.e .. ranrwu.......su.e.�p rr..a.... 2e..nn DnOxi4m8Ye1iYsvlla . o.�uw i/f•ro an.xe M..xrM r.,y rw S.ve.. N.new vw.w...r . xnu. a.:n.. a..a,. ro.ex ua, ..,.m...: CENTIFICATIOM �N�� SCALE ONE INCH EQUALS 20 FEET k BEARINGS SHOWN ARE A55,11EO JOB NQ all" JOB NO 8'161 - 'T•LUG n i I \ \ S 1 i i \ 4� .4 o� � Eir Ll�yr 4DwG. I1 VEi`Y noy _A Et J.TiVL Tp ILC'gr 1 I I C OL.ra NfW �lN9rlltts t<Id n eNu�a.. wwwr ulsru•e. WhfW la• wit■ � WT/ . NOo f 1.1►toom W-A- v w11 skr✓ G 79/1!i0' 15 E Zcl I _ . rn• ,6� a_ ����� r'C°^yT„o� n"r UNeNI 1,RR E. J111Mf ,tArrII.M �I +!NCB Ab QL-11 .VLY RT�rr�- 6 10 1 L �iaLMev Ea»mwa A +LIINa db I. I C2t3 rs.r_4/_e. Ra+. EtrL 1 A\TLN N.4- ®� rreY�oL I.Tr� orcNlNtt .wevL� y O PE..TNWN NDN� DyiyTlNb \i hto.?'� E zoZ NfJV N!NCCW IN �' i'�•J 4=ra" ♦q• I •Eat TruLq Ru,L.L GEAraW PLCGR / FKWINe I 17iST--e - ___._...__.. -..... 'h' r}Y. JOINT 1 :aaLR.yT L• Hrub6 Ey_r:Np ll 'I F� HILL FwISH rHIC DJ n VNLx- Q S In4 ` � g�jllvn�FN La-ox• rl Fi'•'E.TE "C WA_L_ NEJ1 G../rE.D THE r/AIOLG -r.v.OVf_ EJI.TMLf WY•2NN t A.TLW W..J. 1107 ..___._TIN!cH TWIa SIOC. DY WNLh- 'ram m ♦.00 � I bMnN•.!'.6 .jqa F F N•ALLG GEiul� p y���-s •� �.��_` S[,Lb Al R•LT /bALlp - In.J� -__ -_ -_ f•NPINI❑ME17 lei VAW YVA=7 iau•!T ;'P !o Tim, _ - - TryL' Yys7jp PLANT 6D'T OR Tux lot G.Tr G.T. cT'/PAINT Brn i7.TCIl - 164- 4•T Nat%D fAINr aw. opyox, � — - � wl e r — — 1•lore I WTw I i QWCVa !lIyTJNU ror-TKN \ � •"qx PATCH t.EE r„w MTV ai E1l�i u.L-PET PAT N 1'+�T E- 4 NoTl.. y T•CMOVb �IF•VOh i 'Lxwr..4, CCLk-I "xc#- cI.R-rE_T FIP- .MINT cxfr. P:. TLR — r-E_rLr•NT�.ri cLwTao 6Y �-�JI ITe.�T u5 'ee'c'.- v�rr•DS rFA. •5M 'C` r T - f Ego, -- GYP, iR Tb' NdlCZ 'I� F IF E1VyilNE WINT'W PATcH WAu_ -�B 4 VAI e&VARR41,10 iY OWN ff& OD�+•s�i ._ - I Z/ iyr. M TpA,tKG Pau ;(." r By <vE ISxIST/N,i GG•uMz TV "p-4 .L f /YQRAc.0 .svG 7wm AGEl A.LT. La �fxP .rag 9�1'-�TLICR/1-E CL!LWu ELTWEL, c LD �P'JNINu 41 PnuJT NI LLS LI<TNEL.N [oc,�4:U CPWNa,4 1 r IcENavEr;,.rRx: +1GN1 .,Lr•droa tRwlRa ; �� . •LNWC. In cT ,, I / ERw�so Nor Gr1I•L � NH M N(q KITE-: Pr c11L. T F1:•s*rNw iR-.E-L.•a rT-•cM cols-„Tr-uuTlc: til o4M�LTt ZC'_s L 9.�� hl'fL PL�rt: 4'leNc-..�✓.Lr Alc.rL TV%. DD4L iTciN4lA•-•� Tp L'LgT aN II �� /` SwITON r mltr- S � rl.hLML.VT �gNTYj OIb _ �_ ti ♦R4 N:— -.1"T WT r+1 MEAL rd. L.A M•oVlOb �R•../.F,.T 6Lplr ryn 6• DnGC WEN" N� I hr_-EfPNI teNO WTI lLsl<R. UT N6e.- m2HL�1 - G —�{r- -� PJV�TINc. yo/ 'T�N'� 6Rft VH A4ML .IWTe nu.ce) ___-• J RITE W 6A.AbSE� A4.Mi6+T! I�ICIYTG SLM• 4" MNr Uez-F scrlffw+ s — -_— RUR -m-,wo h,PWF F4-- Krs - INo 5RE TST•E: /v11tT rLLY•N. IMA 8'-XGwAIl* rr 1,• L-K }f .Ttr-M4 y wLGI Oc»R- 1.18 TR, i.dRJ.a.I.�RNI cA� r�L a E-1 F,LD lot uv'•aa,•;Y-- 10•J z1W t 4r, jA, r*ri iA. -VINTS�Ns . IC'¢•A M.i=v}tia)i 1+1! DMa MRL n4k twA•.!. r.:<F-LT 0- - /!�¢$ L":c F%'_b•�1:%" J11W GI.A.L 'vUalD. MAtu. 44A"r, SVV�NV 4uSS /l�I• Ts--s':•%a.INi c,r. � .,ra» EI Rn•-u '----•- w5 i=b"Iu_a•.I+A •.TRH �(GIF�A L'.o'tv,b wl }11• CS.:/>rw .. ,._ ?Lbtl PR.�r-6112/a' __ Qrl }CLL. wAT F- (6. r•KnD c,- - d r.iINLY` NGI DC4LL T ��V' °vF_ eu.a< cy TI•- T F �- frr- w EHH�ERT HOUSE ADDITION -- n9 �cl \ ,T 178S CONCORDIA ST. ORONO, MN. 55391 Eos ARCHITECTS • SPACE PLANNERS INTERIOR DESIGNERS 6S• EMCEES OR SDDLEVRRD.SUITE DNE EFCELSIORr m-.,.TR 559}I cs121 Ri+-32}I CERTUQCM I mmy cmFMT TNs P-4 wtwmR , i NrO1T rRs rRE1MFD s• R DR IRRII N• oREc, SYRRVSON NO TJRT Irl R OLLT R[1a1fRm rR0•FSSOIN NJIMI/(JMAR"Til1RK Df IK Ri'Y,N T. _, YANLL L:CLy TO Mw*LN LOST'N4 -GN1,RRi'OR MUST FIELD VERIFY ALL ,vAaL rYr• �v C"f `.SIGNS BEFORE COMMENCING WORK tYML %C':,Y 9ACuITECT IuME01AfELY IF ENG71NG Gk•�1•VL Sx/ICE PNf ^'SCA- -PPNCIES ARE FOUND. 'fcEMel , PL EVM•LG •7 L X. cw rG G Tw PIlDIt ff I I T_ LraYlb• i 1E-- {pIMEYHR ++INN Le L'•II'. !� MIW i'6Clzf p• 4 WA* J WALL !i`� LV4rGT'�NEMr 1°RT ,f�CNLNR WWI tsYAP�N r=I.W I ..,II J +'� T-'-•- I PANEL INTO Lxoa Nu I• IueTlw4 T A�. aL _F&CF�1917P11 / reVNP^7 r3A' I I IJC�NT F%xr"X—= �-o_riIEWLE ; • NVMNAI•• Mi=r"1'' 1 A. F-Ec �,• _ __ rats -.erg rpou r _ . • I_TG � ' FLOOR PLAN —� -- - SCHEDULES r 57 Al _J , �:76 w. 1 _ w EHLERT rrr ras. aeNcr.—_ _. __— !'L"•' .•.�RMLT ,/�.L :. ,.,� v�$, r f5♦ GFLT. •7<• NAPT9-�E l•i`rL>trezv E+.op=.Nq.vr+,Nn �+. 'w.+lw ss`• �' ��- HOUSE c N - . • rJ�M1 �� W b'•IL:PR1T,NwLary/�NAG _ .y NO,pzTPY f � t.tP. 11'•' IP_ci1.L ADDITION r..L t� . M�� QA wti / T--- _. w i.11rP �j/./r �gpT�.rrMLj'-��A � N EMIeTMO! I� ❑ qv« J7.1R7a a P,,� lvi�rL•wpL •, ! --_ If qp.T- rcva6s i -•- /y�R)'W'/-t'• ,kYr s..e'!Ti//NF ?� Pb FaF 'I+^ NRTtVr 6Yuo+YA �I r cMMm Na ` MMRY f,. 1�`1 l' V' _ ryr' wrrl.as rPrwr 2a.Ws¢ rt`n'•:a .. i'ti '`s„r is C o k 5 N�'sT,c�•I V E z eTNq N6MT-- �.TiG.�- nT�4 t•I>TIN;� WyE wu.c ypV+' I.al'NJ71'tu'f — —..- n.mN- riPiT 1•IIVt '.MSN pleLF F...4t LTNr. 1E�7+ EL...EVATION � ✓ -' I=c nuV WNG.WW , ID r4XL r LAICVF. FN&JY pa 4D•Vp PhTN .ILIV LI qzj M1EYLI.6. [: N'THI NLN �'N LXIbTN<z .•% NLL HOUSb ALT. a•IK ^I XRIWc•bzLv. mrten! /� �•IY L�� i,'. , tN.. I jj'•'�� nrs Jna1D �is .rvrw .Ls MY. �� � Rrlfw e. w r PEN �, �• �� ` ,,T-. li Jnclf 1.,•rP•-_ P NTeo 1785 CONCORDIA ST. /K. R� ORONO, MN. 55391 it M.Y iw--EIdD•lCf: / SWR. I `.w i --irisc Nw I _tee - r - rT I -"I xTV,nMT � � CJIAyv'C �X•YIG2' _ � r r 'tip' EIM.—� rl Mt ALSNw� Ell !" ONu IfICK �n• w NRaW T �. F�/�\/� s•iNWMww IN. TeN-ILUY-li•EJME<!' V - `rV� i MN. paXK Nn.Y _•1 • TX� Raw.: ur. _ �- vxP."I amn PTM W/ 2 w 6•'s -- ---_. �'aww • ,s rv' ax �J� t��� •• r e. R.r IJI C)OFPOFIF�TON SINS SEci it CNI e• is R's ►n LD --- I ARCHITECTS 0 SPACE PLANNERS �, wlNNowc .L, yq. a/sp INTERIOR DESIGNERS 6•t EXCELSIOR SO EVRRO•SU IrE ONE EXCELSIOR, nM su TR s.... I ,� '-• . -- - TY4 GT+F r..^�: .IcmYa. ....IT wP-••t:. M21 •n-zzsl L1N i-'u- J YOIM _ 'jC V.ATLH LKI•rTllJ�I h-- c GL.eFs 'Ty- P cnr NOTE'-+ 2 &°�T EL�yATIc1V Mr:Tti riP-Ir - ---> l" ••h.: i _-,IrF�. J`'• 1 •F h*'M" 1:%ICTN4 (f_-TLJ..aNIN(7 --_ LiMOvt. tT� TV4 ' C I'J.X91/2 MICQO A �4. 14im -r" dPI wu.ON E PCrLH LAM b IL" f I.V.-GH LxJ aTN ' tR4 PRl.MNU tr -- .> `7• LCVr ocfFlr',tE.i'r W 61DN4 �M.4TLN i:upµ{;.•Il Ix Ti-1M Ti IMT'-1'L. /e!Ii �. !r H4obll.t �YELrPT1 .v P•n'R � -w - •x•rFIY P'Vib-1 Lt..l.\. LaYI: JIU•TNu . Lw wIN[xw "IN q,n i' _.._- _ s�- _ - ---- -.:"X 91h� / I. Jrl:!(C WTNCI '` _. _ - I ' - - - Rc ct '� - MFl•O �R9 _ te'- I.1Pf.F! TC — # i .X t srr F" -rt v1 L, ra 4ulnulEa et{/ -.. __ uur PI1rNaIl j >ti 1` ') WINL.7N NEI.. i� � .. t/L YL•Ylti�. tLY.L fLN .� -'- -- — -- -_ 66Lff. NIN1 4�w. ._1Iw. �. — -' -� --. _ .. :- P'M RT:fN CM •II't�•st csx� L tiLTi.lt.(-- ��AL IVL'.I�o• AL I'k.E.:'-o' �'L-1'/L'-•'__I ` '3 `.rGtlffi T.^rt ,AL 1P•Ib-_..__. EL..fc VATIGTI .___.._._..-_._.._.._._....___.-_—._._...___.__ EXpfMN�. NfW - - - -'-- 1NS1tL.. aua ._: __- _ }VN IQ r I ru'a-r La•w,r. _ __ .• b•.1�-PF T -- --Trr. w.wL� .IcTr., �•,�. utf MYMALT .Na+rat.fJa cN TM44 FAT 6•PL1.1 .yc •_Tr.I�Sf.hLVL'3i l• Vi KY NCO. 4L-+TINL9 1 �(- '—F- N _- 1 CA' I'.YPWVo LMd.J•-LAYMLIJr ' VFJ•Fr HINI_E Iil• Ika Yla'wNG /.UG.PI.WP-- SLaYF- 'to —SCN EJI•sT IN La i`r•-i^ TFIN N.LY VAPCP- LI.LIIEP- _ •:J14 FFAMING . ( M..TLN W 1Mkl VL r Fl.4ftNr4C3 61F..•.Tr IN• 6. - -- Sx - Wcc.....•.TO. lip, p i —.- .. - t iE:lN4 ENNW La•+E«4j 6/At ILYWroL -%frlT 1 L IY 11 -- - VENt PLN.NIV4 y ❑t `_ _ _yX•' Ww. IU..Tn sRv / it 11/4X'11/t Nluav LM1 T'! i MLTAL I - 'acR.E.EN .T - I ._ __. ro�pp c� �. '� _. �_c_..._.- �a�iT LKI•-,TIN:.1 ' ' kE...Tio pat •/LI FLYNxU —� l _ .. ,- .. R. •_.^F�� � �h.tJT :. TIII•U �• LMC-ATMNLT -'-'-`T' -- 9/4•T.Oft V-Jolhfr PAINT NLN r."mm. N orw c - Ci0 uc•PPIT Te t-tTW14 N..LL MIS.6 LwF-" 4 WE%`r E_-EVATION nr.� .c —LJ. 9 UE.T.hIL �LE-TgIL CERTIFICATION: I If1Elf turn rNlr rN6 .L64 gEcf tlrt6•. a wrar .Rt I'PF17tlfO n R a ul¢R m owcr tONJN641 MO I M R f IIEE61[RCO PRUEESS C R.5 K rNC SrRrE O NOTES: CONTRACTOR MUST FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. NOTIFY ARCHITFET IMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND. 1 ELEVATIONS SECTION DETAILS COMM NO.: 87152 DRAWN: JR DATE: 11/18/87 REV: e/ow ,+ 2 li i�i�m�uwl ANCE SURVEYING • ENGINEERING CO. u.w rr.�s,Iowr �—wnrla. _JOHN EHLERT NLRYLM A-Wnt 10. 11047 MAFTElk 0ptftb i 1, 1107. ALI!UI : F"r q LA, It", fi7iI�D�Ct21S2011t t0t0 t YB 10, COTRO'■ •ODITICM SO ORVY M000, FA —pin County, �'r.rw/rYYYr YrWJY rYMw Wrwbr Wt•rdrW�oa rY.a wdY Wrn.W . rrww,.r.�r r�0.r. ■rwY4AwY rr,ryW wwgrW YA+ArYrw. r....+.w�r..ie M.rl.Jrwr.. r1Y wJ � Yry • YIYv�YIw Y rr r rwW W wA. r� w:rw ry r_ �r rWA W ar rY�ry w rw -' •' w Yww �. e.a_ .... r u.wp rr. ea... tr...., Y Owr IM m N,..w IY+r My � Yr U..r Mr.r rU. M, Y •i r W Y, vA e,.v.. 4.W Yvv wwvwt. rn7IMATlew I rJ� r✓y Mr W �rti AI�rY4 �.vl w T+I ...,rivn! b r. r �w v Air. �W wu. W I r . 4J, �J I� wAw yr Rvirri �w wA.,Y law r W 1..rrY4�.a SCALE ONE INCH EQUALS 20 FEET P %1 C01�`k J��J A BEARINGS SNOWM ACE --EO Joe-9161T