HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-08-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meetingAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 1988, 7:90 P.M.
(*) Asterisk items are .;onsi'ered to be routine items to be enacted upon by
one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda.
Discussion will be held upon reque-t. Memos regarding each of the
Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained
upon request from the Recorder. UJUNCIL MEETING
ROLL CALL
FF_8 - 8 i968
1. CONSENT AGENDA* 2. OATH OF OFFICE - Officer James Morrow CITY OrC OROW
Officer Peter Palmer
APPROVAL OF MINDTES
* 3. Re'r3ular Meeting of January 25, 1989 (Mailed to Council 2/2/88)
PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person)
PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Robert Ko.,t Chairman
'. 1988 Work Plan
111.FNNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Maureen Bellc.ws Representative
WING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
#1214 Richard Ziminski, 1095 North Brown Road - Preliminary Subdivision
- Resolution
6. #1223 John Waldron, 1951 Concordia Street - Conditional Use Permit
7. #1232 Betz Builders, 60/100 Stubbs Buy Road - Pre -Subdivision -
Resolution
8. #1234 John & Lynn Dougan, 2785 White Oak Circle - Renewal Conditional
Use Permit
9. #1238 Wayzata Country Club, 200 Wayzata Blvd - Conditional Ule
Permit/variance - Resolution
10. Policy for Land use Application Fubmitt_als
*11. Road Name Request - Landmark Corstruction Inc.
ENGINEER'S REPORT
*12. Pay Reques'- #1 - E. H. Renner & Sons
*13. Change Order #1 and #2 - E. 11. Renner & Sons
MAYOR'S REPORT
14. Planning Commission Appointments
15. Park Commission Appointments
CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
16. Facilities Study - Phase I
17. Baldur Park Road
18. Proposed Jr.int Planning Commission/Council Meeting
*19. Highway 12 - Corridor Study Meeting - February 29, 1988
*20. Comprehensive Plan #2 - Status
*21. 1972 Shadywood Road
*22. 1988 Fire Contracts
*23. West Hennepin Recyc:linq Commission Joint =Towns Agreement Renewal
*24. 1988 Insurance Agent of Record
*25. nisposal of. Fxress Property
*26. Step Increase - Officers Ander3on anti English
AGENDA FOR COUNCIL, MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, FEB RUARY 8, 1988, 7:00 P.M.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Continued
*27. Administrator's Information
3405 Shoreline Drive
200 Hollander Road
Big Island Board of Governors
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District - Metropolitan Council Analysis
Goal Setting Status
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT.
LICENSES (28*) Joint Use Dock Licenses - Resolutions
BILLS (29*)
ADJOURNMENT
CI-JUWCIL MEETING
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JA?64y Y4g84988
ATTENDANCE 7:00 P.M. CITY OF ORONO
The Orono Council met on the above date with the
following members present: Mayor Grabek, Councilmembers
Peterson, Callahan, and Goetten. Councilmember Sime was
absent. The following represented the City staff: City
Administrator Bernhardson, Public Works Director
Gerhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth,
Building official Jacobs, and City Recorder Peterson.
City Attorney Barrett was also present.
CONSENT AGENDA*
OATH OF OFFICE --
OFFICER JAMES
OFFICER PETER
It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to approve the Consent Agenda
subject to removal of the following items:
#16 - Boat Ramp Enforcement Status - requested by
Councilmember Callahan
#17 - Bid Award-200 Hollander Road - requested by
City Administrator Bernhardson
#20 - Administrator's Information -Art Center Assess-
ment - requested by Councilmember Peterson
Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
MORROW
PALMER
This matter was
meeting because
meeting.
delayed until the February 8th Council
the Officers were unable to attend this
APPROVAL OF MINUTES*
It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by
Coun-i lmember Peterson, to approve the Minutes of the
January 11, 1988 Council meeting as submitted. Motion,
Ayes 4, Nays 0.
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT -
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR SEARCH
1988 LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM
I,MCD Representative Jo Ellen Hurt, was present for this
matter and reported on the following matters:
-Executive Director Search - They have received 1
application to date with a closing date for
arplications set in April.
-,.'omp Plan - Proposals will be opened and reviewed
the eveninq of January 26th. Hurr stated she is
,)pposed to takinq any action on the plan until
February.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1988
LMCD REPORT CONTINUED
-Met Council Evaluation - Hurr submitted to Council
the evaluation by the Met Council of the LMCD which
addresses some funding issues. She felt the report
was very positive.
-1988 Legislative Program - They had a meeting with
many of the legislators in attendance and hope for
their support. They had 13 proposals of which 6 may
be submitted, however no major changes are being
submitted.
-Lake Lovers Ball - Scheduled for February llth at
Lord Fletchers. Comedian Susan Voss is scheduled to
appear.
Mayor Grabek felt the City and other State agencies
participation was imperative to the success of the LMCD
along with choosing a new director.
PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS -
PRELIMINARY SCULPTOR DESIGN APPROVAL
Park Commission Chairman Bob Kost introduced sculptor,
Mr. Nicholas Legeros to present a wax model of the
proposes sculpture for Livingston Tower Park. He noted
that the Park Commission has recommended approval of the
sculpture.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mr. Legeros presented a wax model of a bird bath with
floating leaves in it. He also showed a sample of the
bronze material that would be used in its construction
if approved. He noted the durable safe design of the
sculpture.
Mayor Grabek felt the the proposed sculpture was
appropriate and would enhance the nature of Livingston
lower Park.
it was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember
Goet ten, that Orono Council approves the scu ltor, Mr.
Nicholas Legeros, to undertake the next step in the
sculpture design. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
Mrs. Lloyd Nehring, 1972 Shadywood Road, isked Counci i
to please consider dropping the criminal charges against
them for feeding the wildlife. Referring to an incident
occurring on her property, she felt that their rri vacy
has been violated by the City.
Council recommended that this matter be discussed in
Executive Session because of the lawsuit.
N
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1988
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
#1214 RICHARD ZIMINSKI
1.095 NORTH BROWN ROAD
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
RESOLUTION
Per Staff request, it was moved by Mayor Crdbex,
seconded by Councilmember Peterson, tr, table application
#1214 until the February 8, 1988 Council meeting.
Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
# 11'9 4 M C (: HAEL PLANK &
4145 WATERTOWN ROAD
FINAL SUBDIVISION
RESOLUTION #2357
MAYOR'S REPORT:
It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution $2357
approving the final plat of Maple Place. Motion, Ayes
S, Nays 0.
Mayor Grabek had no report.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
HAZARDOUS BUILDING PROCEEDINGS:
-3440 BAYSIDE ROAD - RESOLUTION #2358
-3865 SHORELINE DRIVE - RESOLUTION #2359
-3875 SHORELINE. DRIVE - RESOLUTION #2360
-3877 SHORELINE DRIVE - RESOLUTION #2361.
-2405 DUNWOODY AVENUE - RESOLUTION #2362
3440 Lav_;ide Road -
conditi.,r,
2nd floor removed -deteriorated
Todd h Marie Ziesmer, owners of the property, were
present for this matter. Mr. Ziesmer stated that at
this point, they have contacted the Long Lake Fire
Depart —it to schedule removal of the structure.
1t wed ved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by
Counc_ :fiber Goetten, to adopt. Resolution #2358
order in,, batement of Hazardous Building action at
3440 Bayside Road, subject to ho.ding the action i:,
abeyance for 30 days. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
3865/3875/3877 Shoreline Drive and 2405 Lunwoodv Avenue -
Deteriorated -no maintenance
City Administrator Bernhardson noted that the owner
of these four properties, Mr. Louis Oberhauser, was
unable to attend this meeting. He explained that
staff has dealt with the property owner regarding
one of these properties in the past and the owner has
ccntinually delayed addressing the deficiencies.
Building Official Jacobs indicated to Mr.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1988
HAZARDOUS BUILDING PROCEEDINGS CONTINUED
Oberhauser that staff would recommend Council adopt
the hazardous building actions and that Mr.
Oberhauser could subsequently discuss the issues
with staff.
1t was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by
Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolutions #2359 -
#2362 orderin(-, `batement of Hazardous Building
action at 3865/ � -/3877 Shoreline Drive and 2405
Dunvoody Avenue, `)ject to holding the action in
abeyance for 30 u-is to allow Mr. Oberhauser to
present a plea for rectifying this situation.
Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
HOME OCCUPATION LICENSE -
2160 WEBBER HILLS ROAD
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request
from Peter Moos, 2160 Webber Hills Road, for a home
occupation license to operate a carpet cleaning business
from his home. Staff recommends approval finding that
the proposed opera ion meets all of the home occu-ation
standards, subject to the provisicn that parking of
commercial vehicles in open parking areas be pro::ibited.
Applicant was not present for this matter.
Councilmember Callahan expressed concerns with this type
of home occupation and the impact on the neighborhood
with numerous home occupations within a residential
area.
Staff explained that this type of home occupation met
the City's home occupation standards and •.hat any
violation of these standards or complaints may result in
revocation of the license.
Building Official Jacobs explained that this home
occupation consists mainly of storage of equipment for
the off -site rug cleaning business.
It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember
Goetten, to approve the Home Occupation License for Gold
Leaf ChemDry by Peter Moos at 2160 Webber Hills Road.
Motion, Ayes 4, Nayg 0.
4
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1988
DISCUSSION WITH LEGISLATORS
Senator Gen Olson and State Representative John Burger
were present to discuss their ideas and views regarding
the upcoming legislative session with the Council.
State Representative Burger stated that most of the
attention in this legislative session will be given to
the larger cities, Iron Range, and agricultural areas.
He noted there will be some attention given to Local
Gover,iment Aid and School Aid .4hich will be main?y
adjustments or "fine tuning" of the formulas. He does
not expect any major property tax reform. He noted
there has been alot of heat regarding the 1988 renters
cr-lit and homestead credit cliduge in which he felt
th -e may be some adjustments back toward the way they
we-e because of major heat received. He noted the
critical issue regarding what kind of funding to give
the Greater Minnesota Corporation. This is a new
organization designed to encourage the joint efforts of
the private sector and public post secondary education
organizations to do research that will lead to job
creating companies for "Greater" Minnesota.
Senator Gen Olson stated she will be putting her efforts
towards issues relating to keeping the various
bureaucracies involved with parks from achieving a
preemption of 1,-cal approval for acquisition and
condemnation for the purpose of a Lake Minnetonka
regional park.
Mayor Grabek encouraged Senator Olson and State
Representative Burger to obtair. the necessary media
expo,-ure for these issues. lie noted a letter from Lt.
Governor Marlene Johnson regarding the Minnesota
childcare dilemma. He felt the State of Minnesota doe•i
more for the unemployed than for the employed.
State Representative Burger stated that he is serving on
an advisory committee that will be studying public
services.
State Representative Burger noted that light rail
transit will be another debated issue.
Council thanked Senator Olson and State Representative
Burger for coming and speaking with them.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1988
HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR SELECTION STUDY
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the information
regarding a preliminary process for a possible Highway
12 corridor selection sturiy and establishing a meeti;:q
of interested communities to commence the discussion
process.
Councilmember Goetten stated she was in favor of having
a discussion meeting, but voiced concern with the
extremely high cost figures related to undertaking a
corridor study.
It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember
Peterson, that the Council acknowledge the information
regarding the draft plan and that the meeting be
established for February 29, 1988 at the Orono School to
discuss issues regarding the process, its financing and
the organizational arrangements to undertake a corridor
selection study. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
COUNTY 15 AGREEMENT APPROVAL -
RESOLUTION #2356
City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the four
issues of concern have been resolved and recommend
adoption of the County 15 agreement.
It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by
Mayor Grabek, that the Council adopt Resolution #2356
and approve the terms for an amended agreement between
Hennepin County and the C-ty of Orono. [lotion, Ayes 4,
Nays 0.
1987 CORPORATE REPORT
It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember
Goetten, that Council adopt the corporate report
information as a summary of the City's activities for
1987. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
1986 FINANCIAL HEALTH REPORT
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the information
from the State Auditor regarding the City's financial
profile.
It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember
Peterson, that the Council accept the State Auditor's
Financial Healtlj Profile for the City of Orono for 1982
through 1986. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
STEP INCREASE - OFFICER MARK THONTOW
It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to approve step increase from.
$2, 1 02.00 to $2, 365.00 per month for Officer Mari:
Tnomton in accordance with the Police Labor Agreement.
Motion, Ayes 4, Na, z 0.
6
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1988
BOAT RAMP ENFORCEMENT
Councilmember Callahan questio:ed staff about the random
selection of boat ramps sited in this matter. HF also
questioned the significance of the 1975 date noted in
staff's memo.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated the survey area waG
not preplanned but was merely the first lakeshore area
close to City offices, along with knowledge of a few
properties found in a previous application, and the
lakeshore properties owned by members of the Council
would customarily be included in such a survey. She
explained that the lakeshore district standards which
would prohibit boat ramps located within the lakeshore
protected area was adopted in January 1975.
Councilmember Goetten asked if other properties will be
looked at.
City Administrator Bernhardson stated if the Council
desires, staff will continue reviewing properties as
time permits.
Councilmember Callahan felt it was more appropriate to
handle the issues by complaint or staff's review of
variances and conditional use permits.
It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by
Mayor Grabek_ to accept staff's information regarding
the status of boat ramp enforcement. Motion, Ayes 4,
Nays 0.
BID AWARD - HOLLANDER ROAD
City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the owner
has found a contractor to remove the barn for less than
the bids obtained by the City; and has promised to have
the barn removed by the end of February. Staff
recommends that Council approve the low bid obtained by
City for the removal of the barn in the event that the
owner fails to remove it by the end of February.
It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember
Goetten, to award the building removal at 200 Hollander
Road to )ressel Excavating for an amount of $5,650 and
to authorize negotiating for costs for a drive approach
if necessary. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
WEST HENNEPIN RECYCLING PAYMENT SCHEDULE•
It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to approve the payment formula
and amounts to the West Hennepin Recycling Commission
for 1988. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
s
MINU^.ES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HPL. JANUARY 25, 1)88
APPROVAL OF DISCIPLINE*
It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, the Orono Council approve the
employee discipline of Jerome Smith contained within
Attachment A. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION
City Administrator recommended that the Art Center
Assessment issue be discussed by Council in Executive
Session since this is a matter of legal neqotiations.
Curt Quady requerled to comment on this issue before
Council addressed it in Executive Session. He felt that
the Art Center should be required to pay the $5,500 per
sewer unit, the same rate that the Crystal Bd y resident!
were required to pay.
It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by
Ccuncilmember Peterson, to accept City Administrator
Bernhardon's Information regar'ing: Comprehensive Plan
M2, 3405 Shoreline, Board of Review Date, Deer Hunt,
Administrator's Vacation, and Planning Commission
January Meeting. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
CITY An9ORNEY'S REPORT:
Council entered into Executive Session to discuss
matters previously referred to Executive Session.
LICENSES*
It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to approve the following
licenses:
Residential Kennel Licenses:
Ross B. Nathanson, 2420 Countryside Drive
Albert 6 Sally Hanser, 1685 Fox Street
Ciga-ette Licenses:
Navarre Amoco, 3360 Shoreline Drive
Rick's Super Valu, 3333 Shoreline Drive
Jimmie's Lounge, 3380 Shoreline Drive
Navarre Bowling Lanes, 3435 Shoreline Drive
O'Sullivans, 2420 Shadywocd Road
Little Oak Market, 2160 Wayzata Blvd.
Washington Scientific, 2605 Wayzata Blvd.
Navarre Liquors Inc., 3421 Shoreline Drive
Keaveny's Navarre Drug, 3425 Shoreline Drive
Wayzata Country Club, 200 Wayzata Blvd.
Crystal Bay Services, 3398 North Shore Drive
Spring Hill Conference Center, 725 6th Ave N
Gambling License: (Renewal Pull -Tabs)
Jimmie's Lounge, 3380 Shoreline Drive for Multi-
ple Sclerosis Society North Star Chapter
Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
P.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR DRONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1988
BILLS •
It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to approve payment of the All
Funs', Ac: ounts . Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
ADJOURNMENT 9:00 P.M.
It was moved by Councilmember Peterson, seconded by
Councilmember Goetten, to ad jo,irn the regular Council
meeting at 9:00 P.M. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor
CAPICIL MEETING
To: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator
" Fj j�r+p
From: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director
Date: February 4, 1988 CITY OF OROW
Subject: 1988 Work Plan - Orono Park Commission
Following for review and comment is the 1988 Work Plan from the Orono
Park Commission. The items listed dre all inclusive but are items that
are being reviewed due to citizen requests and Park Commis3ion Members'
review and recommendation for the Parks and Recreation System.
Mr. Bob Kost, Park Commissioner Chairperson, will be in attendance on
February 8, 1988 to discuss the Work Plan with the Council.
ORONO PARK COMMISSION 1988 •- nK PLAN
1. Prepare, distribute and evaluate user needs survey.
2. Review and draft recommendations on park dedication requirements.
3. Continue planning and implementation of bike/hike trail system.
4. Continue promotion of City Parks through newspaper stories, signaqe and
public input.
5. Continue review and draft recommendations of park and recreational
section of Comprehensive Plan.
6. Continue improvements of parks, based on annual tour/survey and public
input.
TO: Mayor and City Council ,
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administracozi.
Forwarded Recommending approval.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded ., _ the Orono Council
having reviewed the Wo.k Plan agrees with the Park Plan for 1988.
Ayes Nays
C'JUWCIL MEETING
TO: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members
City Administrator Bernhardson 81�:�j
FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator CITY OF ORO"
DATE: February 3, 1988
SUHJ: #1214 Richard & Karen Ziminski, 1094 Brown Road North -
- Preliminary Subdivision - Resolution
List of Exhibits -
A - Preliminary Plan, Exhibit I of January 25 Packet
B - Reviser Plans
C - Corrected Resolution
D - Staff Sketch
The Ziminski preliminary subdivision application was tabled
when staff was made aware by the applicant that the preliminary
plan (Exhibit A) submitted with your packet information for your
January 25th meeting did not accurately describe the existing
drive areas that serve the property.
Please review exhibit B, the revised plan clearly defines
the paved area in relation to the proposed dividing line- In
order to meet the condition that no though traffic or shared use
of drives be allowed to continue, staff would ask only that the
graval drive within Lot 2 be removed within a 30' area to the
east of the dividing line (Refer to Exhibit B). The removal
must be completed by May 1, 1988 or prior to the issuance of a
building permit for new construction for Lot 2 which ever occurs
first.
The enclosed resolution has been amended to reflect the new
information. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat
application for Richard and Karen Ziminski subject to the
findings and conditions set forth in the amended resolution.
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL
OF A SUBDIVISION APPLICATION
FOR KAREN & RICHARD ZIMINSRI
FILE NO. 1214
WHEREAS, Karen & Richard Ziminiski (hereinafter "the applicants")
on September 25, 1987 filed a formal subdivision application with the
City for a division of 2 lots of a property legally described as follows:
See Exhibit A, (hereinafter "property"); and
WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with
Minnesota Statues 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and
Platting Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held public hearings -n
October 19, 1987 and December 21, 1987 at which times all persons desiring
to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak
thereon; and
WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on January 25, 1988, the
Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of the
applicants, noting the following findings of fact:
1. The property is located within the RR-lB Single Family Rural
Residential zoning district requiring a minimum of 2 acres of
contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot.
2. The property contains a total of 6.2 acres, all of which is
considered dry buildable.
3. The proposed plat contains 2 lots each meeting the 2 acre minimum
lot area requirement.
4. Each lot shall be served by an existing curb cut. Lot 1 shall
access only off County Road 6 and Lot 2 shall access only off North
Brown Road.
5. All of the lots meet the required 200' width adjacent to the road
and at the rear of the front yard setback line. A single family
residence can be constructed on Lot 2 without the need for any
variances.
6. Septic testing has corfirmed that. each lot contains adequate and
suitable soils for on -site sewage treatment disposal systems.
Page. 1 of -?
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon either one or more
of the f indings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby
approves the preliminary plat application of Karen & Richard Ziminski per
the pl-t drawings by Mark S. Gronberg dated September 25, 1987 and revised
January 18, 1988, subject to the condition that prior to the issuance of
building permits for new construction the final plat must be filed with the
Iiennepin County Recorder's Office and the removal of the existing paving
completed by May 1, 1988. Please note a building permit will not be
issued for new construction on Lot 2 until specified area of existing
gravel drive is removed.
Final Plat Submittals
The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning
Administratcr two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on
the seconfq and fourth Mondays of the month:
i. RECORD PLAT drawings in the fori, of two (2) mylar copies and one
(1) copy reduced to 1"=200'. Drawing to include:
a) Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Mark S. Gronberg
dated September 25, 1987 and revised January 18, 1988.
b) Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' wide along
all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of inter al
property lines.
c) Dedication of road right-of-ways for North Brown Road and
County State Aid Highway No. 6.
2. LEGAI )CUMENTS required:
a) le opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage
hoA.k c or others with property interest indicated therein shall
sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest.
b) The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded
easements currently affecting the property.
3. FEES TO BE PAID: Total Due $425.00
a) Park dedication fee per current schedule:
$200 x 1 = $200..00
b) Final. plat fee - $150.00.
c) Logal review and filing fees of $75.00.
Page 2 of 3
r.
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a
regular meeting held this 25th day of January, 19P8.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk
Jame R. Grabek, Mayor u+
Page 3 of 3
CANCIL IWEETING
To: Mayor Graben & Orono Council Members �,�� Or
City Administrator Bernhardson f QRUM0
From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst planning & Zoning Administrator
Date: February 3, 1988
Subject: #1223 John B. Waldron, 1951 Concordia Street -
Conditional Use Permit & Variance - Denial Resolution
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A - Council Minutes of 1/11/88
Exhibit B - Notice of Council Action Dated 1/14/88
Exhibit C - Sketch From Applicant Showing Revised Proposal
Exhibit D - Letter From City Engineer Regarding Revised Proposal
Exhibit E - Proposed Resolution
Discussion -
At Council's January llth, 1988 meeting, Council voted 4-0 to deny the
walkout excavation cut, directing staff to draft a resolution of denial for
the next meeting. Applicant was subsequently advised by staff that it
would be appropriate for him to make a final proposal regarding the bank
restoration which even without the walkout cut would require a conditional
use permit. and variance review. Applicant was also advised to verify
whether or not he still proposed a deck on the property.
Applicant subsequently submitted a drawing showing a 3' deep, flat-
bottomed excavation on the lakeshore side of his home. The area proposed
to be excavated to a 3' depth is approximately 2/3's of the existing
lakeshore yard area. Based on this plan, which is not dimensioned,
applicant also proposes to create a new balcony apparently from the main
f loor of the house, and retain the existing deck neat the precipice. The
drawing dces not indicate exactly how the lakeshore bank is to be restored
but indicates generally a uniform grade from top to bottom.
City Engineer Glenn Cook has reviewed the plan submitted and indicates
that from 150-200 cubic yards of material would be removed under this
scheme. Cook feels that this proposal is not significantly different than
the previous submittal, and there would be no significant improvement ir.
run-off water quality nor any reduction in water quantity discharged as a
result of the improvement.
It would appear from the drawing submitted that no retaining walls
will be installed. From a visual standpoint, an area of foundation wall 3'
high by 30' long will be exposed. The beneficial effect of this proposal
from the applicant's standpoint apparently is that a slightly flatter slope
can be established in restoring the bank than if the present elevations
were to remain. However, as staff noted previously, the extent of the
grading proposed far exceeds that which is necessary in order to accomplish
adequate and acceptable bank restoration.
Zoning File #1223
February 3, 1988
Page 2 of 2
Staff Recommendation -
A resoluticn fog- denial of any excavation for & walkout cut has been
drafted and is attached. Adoption of this denial resolution does not
preclude the Council from adopting a resolution for approval of a
conditional use permit and variance for just the bank restoration project
at a later date should the applicant eventually submit an approvable bank
restoration plan. Applicant has not yet verified which of the proposed
methods suggested by the City Engineer as suitable he wishes to proceed
with.
Council would appear to have a number of options:
A. Adopt the denial resolution under the assumption that applicant
will eventually submit an acceptable proposal, at which time a
resolution for a conditional use permit/variance approval can be
adopted.
B. Table this application until such time that applicant submits a
suitable grading plan, and incorporate the walkout cut denial into a
conditional use permit/variance approval resolution.
C. Direct staff to draft a resolution of approval of the current
plan, if Council feels that that plan is conceptually acceptable.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 11, 1980
1223 JOHN WAI.DRON
1951 CONCORDIA STREET
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/
VARIANCE
Juhn and Lynn Waldron were present for this matter.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request to
repair the lakeshore bank that was damaged during the
1987 storm by lowering the grade to create a walkout
from the existing house, construct a retaining wall
along that cut up to the house, and regrade the slope
and seed it along the lakeshore. Planning Commission
recommended denial of the wal:cout cut, feeling it was
not related to the stabilization of the bank Prosion,
aiid finding that allowing the walkout cut would set a
fi.:ecedent in conflict with current City philosophy. He
cited two previous applications where a walkout and/or
grading were allowed within the 0-75' lakeshore setback
zor.q, however unique hardships were present in these
cases that are not present in the Waldron application.
Per staff memo, Planning Commission recommended
approval of the ground level deck as proposed sabject to
concurrent removal of the existing platform structure
near the lake. Staff generally agreed with Planning
Commission's recommendation.
Mr. Waldron submitted photos of his property and
explained that 2 to 4 feet of level ground at the top of
the slope was lgst during the storm, and he would like
to restore that area. Addressing the City's concern on
the effect of the quality and quantity of runoff into
the lake, he stated it has been established that his
proposal would not adversely effect the lake.
In response to Mr. Waldron's statement, City Engineer
Cook stated ti,Qre would be very little difference in the
actcia 1 quality of the runoff water with any of the
options used.
Mr. Waldron explained that grading would be required
with any option used. Aesthetically, he felt his
proposal is preferable to the other options. He stated
that his proposal would involve less earth disturbance.
As a safety issue, his proposal would provide a better
view of the lakeshore from the house. He noted that
based on estimates he has obtained, the amount of his
disaster loan would not afford the options of
stabilization fabric, cribbing, or retaining wall that
would stand up for years. Regarding setting a
precedent, he felt that the storm damaqe issue dsemed
his application unique.
6
/INUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 11, 1988
�1223 WALDRON CONTINUED
Councilmember Callahan asked Mr. Waldron if the storm
damage could be repaired using his proposal without
creation of the walkout.
Mr. Waldron stated it could be done to a certain extent
but would create less useable flat yard area.
Mayor �,rabek felt it was inappropriate to allow %e
creation of the walkout in conjunction with repairing
storm damage.
It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember
Callahan, to deny the conditional use permit and
variance as proposed.
Councilmember Peterson asked Mr. Waldron if he would
have made the request for the creation of the walkout
had the rtorm damage not occurred?
Mr. Waldron stated he would not have made the request
based on the fact that the previous owner made a similar
request for a walkout and was rejected based on the fact
that there was no physical hardship. He felt in his
case at this time, the storm damage presented a definite
physical hardship.
Councilmember Sime also felt that a complete alteration
was inappropriate in conjunction with restoration of
storm damage.
Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
#1229 RICHARD RANSON
3826 CHERRY AVENUE
VARIANCE
RESOLUTION f2344
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for
a variance to construct a 3-season porch and deck within
the 75' lakeshore setback area. Planning Commission
recommended approval subject to redesign allowing a
sliding door on the south side of porch only. Applicant
has complied with Planning Commission's recommendation
to redesign plan.
Richard Hanson was present for this matter and had no
comments or questions.
It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by
Councimember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2344 per
Planning Commission recommendation as drafted. Motion,
Ayes 4, Nays 0.
7
APPLICATION NO. 1223
CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 1/14/88
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TO: John B. Waldron COPIES:
1951 Concordia Street
Wayzata, MN 55391
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Variance/Conditional Use Permit
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE OF MEETING: 1/11/88 VOTE: 4 For 0 Against
COUNCIL ACTION - NOTION:
The Council voted to deny your walkout excavation cut, with the
understanding that staff would draft a resolution to that effect for their
next meeting. Given the fact that your bank restoration, -even without the
walkout cut, requires a conditional use permit and variance, it would be
appropriate for you to, as soon as is feasible, submit your final grading
proposal for Council review and approval. Because those plans will have to
be reviewed by the City Engineer, those plans should b,� in this office at
least 10 days prior to the Council meeting at which you wish to appear. In
order to be considered for the January 25th agenda, I would have to have
everything sutmitted by Friday, January 15th, 1988. In order to be placed
on the February 8th, 1988 agenda, I would need your information by Friday,
January 29th, 1988.
Based on City Engineer's support of your proposal, I would then
prepare a resolution for the Council prior to that meeting that reflect
both denial of the walkout cut and approval of bank restoration.
One other issue that has not been suitably resolved is whether or not
you plan to construct a ground level deck on the property. Since that deck
would also require a variance, if you plan to construct it, it should be
included with your proposal at this time.
If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they
are available from the City Recorder or City Clerk after review and
approval by the City Council.
LOKE
,M NNE ToNtir�
�--6X�„TiNG S7EO,
s
w
V l5 Oy
.SIN 2 96W
Gt c/;
j�XLTIAc- Krllg VAKif
_. fro .w
ovCA9W,AJ (.
Otto G Boneqroe. IF Keith A Gor601. ►E ThomaS W Peterson. IE Chare! A Erickson
Robert W Ros!ne. PE RKnud W Foster. PE Michael C lynch. /E Leo '1 Pawetsky
Bones t roo
Joseph C Anderbk. PE Donald C Burgardt, PE James R Mlland. ►E Harr.n M Olson
Bradford A Lemberg, PE Jerry A Bourdon, PE Kenneth P Anderson, PE Susar M Fberlrn
Rosene RKhard E Turher, PE Mark A Hanson, f E Keith A Sathmann, PE Mark A Strip
I James C Olsen, PE Ted K Field. Pf Mark R Roth PC
Anderlik & Gle^^ R Cuol. PE MnhaH T Raut nann PE RdDerl C Rutuk.
�. hwmas E NP/es. PE Robert R Wellerle. PE Thomas E Annut. PC
Associates Robert G Schrrtrtht PE David O Loskota. PE Howard A San'ordPE
Marvm L Sdhala. PE
Engineers & Architects
February 1, 1988
City of Orono
Box o a
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 t�
Attn: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth
Re: File No. 139-1223
John Waldron
Dear Jeanne,
The revised plan submitted on the John Waldron property indicates an excava-
tion of 3 feet in the Lakeshore Yard area. The proposed excavation would be
in the 0-75 foot lakeshore setback area. It is estimated that 150 to 200
cu.yds. of material would be removed.
The proposed plan revision does not significantly change the concept of the
previous submittal. There would not appear to be a significant improvement .n
the water quality or a reduction in the water quantity discharged as a result
of this improvement.
If you have any questions, please contELt this office.
Yours very truly,
RONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIArES. TNC.
Glenn R Cook
GRC:li
233S West Higt1way 16 0 St Paul, Minnesota SS113 • S1? 636'4600
City of ORONO
t
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
A RESOLUTION DENYING
VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL CODE
SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND
SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 6
AND DENYING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PER SECTIONS 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 AND 20
FILE NO. 1223
WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized
and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to State Statutes 412 et. seq. and 462 et. seq.
the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted a Community Management
Plan and Zoning Regulations for the protection of the public health, safety
and general welfare; and
WHEREAS, John and Lynn Waldron (hereinafter "the applicants") are
the owners of the property located at 1951 Concordia Street and legally
described as follows:
The S;;utherly 1/2 of Lot 7 and all of Lot 8, Gust S. Johnson's
Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicants ?i_ve applied to the Citv of Orono
(hereinafter "the City") for variances 'reeking approval of land alterat,.Dns
within 0-75' of the lakeshore of Lake Minnetonka where none is allowed per
Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8, and for a
conditional use permit per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 and 20 for
approval of lakeshore bank restoration which includes excavation to create
a walkout level for the existin-; house; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the application; the
recommendations of the staff and Planning Commission; and the comments and
written statements submitted by the applicant and his consultants.
NOW, THERF.FOnE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
cf Orono hereby denies the application to excavate for a basement walkout
as described above based upon one or more of the following findings of fact
concerning this property:
1. The property is located in the LR-lC, Lakeshcre Residential Zoning
District and consists of 14,363 s.f. or 0.33 acres, The LR-IC
district requires 21,780 s.f. or 0.50 acres in area.
2. The proposed land alterations on the property are located J-•ntire;y
within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone where 08 is hardcover is
normally allowed. The existing hardcover on the property in tF:c 0-75'
zone is 19.7%.
Page I of 5
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
3. The applicant proposed to reduce the 0-75' hardcover by channeling
the run-off water from the roof of the house through a sealed pipe
directly to the lake. The Council finds that, rather than reducing
the effective hardcover on the property, such a proposal would
actually increase the negative effects of run-off from the roof of the
house.
4. The applicants have stated in their letter of application dated
October 22nd, 1987 that the hardship to the property is the massive
erosion that occurred along the lakeshore bank as a result of the July
23rd, 1987 storm. The Council finds that restoration of that erosion
damage may be suitably accomplished without a major excavation to
create a walkout basement situation, as proposed. The Council finds
that any hardship imposed on the property by the bank erosion is not
significantly related to the major excavation that would be necessary
to create a walkout.
5. The Planning Commission reviewed Application No. 1223 at their
meeting of November 16th, 1987 and voted 4 in favor, 0 against, and 1
abstention to recommend denial of the proposed excavation to create a
walkout, based on one or more of the following findings noted by
Commission members:
A. Other methods for bank stabilization exist.
B. The walkout excavation is not related to the bank erosion -
stabilization reeds.
C. The walkout excavation would not be in character or in
conformity with the majority of neighboring residences.
D. Allowing the walkout excavation would set a precedent in
conflict with current City philosophy in past denials in similar
projects.
The Planning Commission recommendation included approval of a ground -
level deck as proposed subject to concurrent_ removal of the existing
platform structure near the lake.
6. The major land alteration proposed in conjunction with the
excavation to create a walkout within the lakeshore p otected area (0-
75' from lakeshore) is found to Lie in complete conflict with the
following principals and goals set forth in Orono's Community
Management Plan:
Page 2 of r
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
SHO_AELAND, FLOOD PLAN AND STORM WATER CONSIDERATIONS - C.M.P. 3-9
ORONO'S MANY MILES OF SHORELINE ARE ESPECIALLY SENSITIVE TO MISUSE OR
OVERDEVELOPMENT. As the interface between land and water, the shoreline
is ever changing. Shorelines are subject to continual erosion by wave
action, ice buildup or unstable soil conditions. Droughts dry out
vegetation and heavy rains or snow melt cause d slipage.
On top of these natural pressures, man is drawn to the lske and the
shoreline often becomes his battleground with nature. Lake access often
means active use and construction of buildings and structures causing
unnatural soil loadings, vegetation removal, and land alteratio.). Exposed
soil becomes more subject to erosion and man-made hardcover increases
direct runoff quantity and speed. Power boats increase wave action and,
more damaging, stir up the lake bottom causing release of nutrients and
increased turbidity.
The impact, of course, is a degradation of water quality, impaired lake
access and a change in the natural aesthetics which drew people to the
shore in the first place. Legal considerations become entangled when
lot descriptions conflict or become inconsistent due to changing water
levels or shoreline locations. Therefore, planning considerations must
recognize the desirability of human interaction with the lake while at
the same time providing for protection of natures sensitively balanced
shoreline ecology.
LAND USE - C.M.P. 4-6
A PRINCIPAL GOAL OF ORONO'S PLANNING PROGRAM IS THE PROTECTION OF NATURAL
RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL AMENT-TIES, PARTICULARLY THE WATER QUALITY OF
LAKE MINNETONKA. The Environmental Protection Plan emphasizes Orono's
unique environmental position in relation to the long-term health of Lake
Minnetonka. Land use and development will not be permitted at the expense
of environmental protection. Retention of natural vegetation, light, air,
and open space will be promoted. Shorelines will be protected from erosion
and alteration. Wetlands and marshland will be protected and preserved
as wildlife habitats, unique open spaces and most importantly as the only
economically practical method of flood protection and storm water runoff
filtration.
GENERAL LAND USE POLICY NO. 2 - C.M.P. 4-12
2. ORONO'S LAND USE PLANS WILL BE EASED UPON E17VIRONA',ENTAL PROTECTION
POLICIES. Land use and development must assure the
conservation, protection and preservation of sensitive
environmental resources in accordance with the goals
and policies of the Environmental Protection, Flan.
Land use poli^;es will encourage the wise use and
managerent of natural resources while prchibiting their
misuse, abuse,, ovi_r1..se or exploitation.
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
GE"ERAL LAND USE POLICY NO. 6 - C.M.P. 4-13
6. LAKE SHORELINES WILL BE PROTECTED FROM ALTERATION.
shoreland areas, whether bluff, beach or floodplain,
are sensitive environmental features with significant
impact on lake water quality, aesthetic values and
land use function. These same factors act to draw
development which can be destructive if not properly
regulated. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas
will be preserved insofar as practical and reason-
able in order to retard surface runoff and soil
erosion, and to utilize excess nutrients. Clear -
cutting will be prohibited. In areas of soil or
wave action erosion, material stone rip rap
shoreline protection will be encouraged.
GENERAL LAND USE POLICY NO. 10 - C.M.P. 4-14
10. PRIVATE STEI7ARDSHIP OF LAND AND RESOURCES IS PREFERABLE TO INFLEXIBLE
PUBLIC CONTROL. Private ownership, maintenance
and stewardship of the land, including open space
and many types of improvements, is favored over
public ownership as being in tha best and most
beneficial interests of the property owner and
the public, providing for more intimate,
responsive and economical land management.
GENERAL LAND USE POLICY NO. 13 - C.M.P. 4-15
13. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT MUST ENHA14CE THE ENVIP..ONMENT.
Land development should respect and enhance the
unique natural features of the site and the
general environmenta, assets of the community.
Preservation of natural views, vegetation,
drainage and general respect for unique site
features always produces more aesthetic
results and lasting value for the property
owner and the community then does wholeaale
alteration of the landscape or mathematical
division to the highest possible density.
URBAN LAND USE POLICY N0. 11 - C.M.P. 4-19
11. A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF NATURAL WOODLANDS AND OPEN SPACR WILL BE
RETAINED ON EACH PROPERTY. Retention of the
natural environment requires careful siting
and preservation of trees and open space on
each urban property.
URBAN LAND CSE POLICY NO. 13 - C.M.P. 4-19
13. RETENTION OF NATUR,IL VEGETATION WILL LIMIT THE IMPACT OF URBT7IZATION
AS VISIBLE FROM THE LAKE. Building heights will
be limited to loss than the typical tree height.
14inimun green belts will be provided with pro-
hibitions against clearcutting or excessive
chinning of vegetation. Naturnl vegetation will
be preserved on slope[ and retaining walls will
be discouraged except when absolutely necessary
to prevent erosion, in which eace they will be
screened with natural vegetation.
4 u t
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
7. The granting of the variances would result in the
violations of Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (A) of the zoning
which the applicant must first comply before the requested
can be granted:
following
code with
variances
A. The property in question can still be put to its existing
reasonable use as a single family residence under conditions
allowed by the official controls, without creation of a ..alkout
basement situation.
B. The plight of the applicant in terms of his perceived need to
have a walkout excavation is created by the applicant and has
nothing to do with any unique hardship related to the land.
C. The variance, if granted, will alter the essential. character
of the locality, by creating a significantly artificially altered
lakeshore topography which other properties i,i the .locality
generally do not have.
D. The granting of the requested variances would appear to serve
merely as a convenience to the applicant as there have been no
valid hardships demonstrated through the review of this
application.
E. The granting of the application is not necessary for the
preservatic._ and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the
applicants.
F. The special conditions applying to the property in question
are not peculiar to this property and are typical of many
properties within the lakeshore areas of Orono.
Adopted oy the City Council of the City of Orono this 8th day of
February, 1988.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor
Page 5 of 5
CI )UNCIL MEETING
TO: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members F= 8 -$1989
City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator CITY Orr
ORONO
DATE: February 2, 1988
SUBJ: #1232 Betz Builders inc, & Clement C. Kroll, 60/100 Stubbs Bay Road
- Preliminary Subdivision - Pesolution
List of Exhibits -
A - Application
B - Property Owners
C - Plat Man
D - MWCD letter 12-18-87
E - Cook letter
F - Preliminary Plat
G - Drainageway/Retention Pond Plan
H - Plat Map of Neighboring Properties
Review of Subdivision -
The applicant proposes a 5 lot division of 2 parcels - Lots 1 thru 4,
Block 1 owned by Betz Builders and Lot 1, Block 2 set aside for future
development and owned by Clement C. Kroll. The subdivision plans confirmed
2 acres of dry buildable in each of the 4 lots on the south side of the
plat road. The private road shall serve all 5 lots. The existing driveway
serving the northern property shall be closed off and all access to Lot 1
Block 2 shall be the plat road.
The existing tennis court on Lot 1, Block 2 does not meet the required
SO' setback from the private road but neither did it meet the 50' from
Stubbs Bay Road nor was is it in line with the front line of the principal
structure at the time of construction. All other structures meet the
required setback from all newly proposed lot lines.
The four 2 acre lots have tested out with mound systems for both
principal and alternate explansion sites; septic testing will. not be
required for Lot 1, Block 2 because it exceeds 5+ acre in area. Staff has
recorded no problem with existing system that serves the residence. Former
residence structure and accessory buildings on proposed Lot 1 Block 1 have
been removed as a result of a separate hazardous building action and were
never part of this current subdivision review.
The City will ask for standard drainage and utility easements along
all lot lines. The drainaqeway to the ponding area to the south of Lot 3
has been directed along the share(' lot line of Lots 2 and 3 at a 15' minium
width on side of the shared lot line. Pondinq area in Lot 3 shall be
designated as a drainage easement on the final plat and described in
angles and bearings. The area of the retention pond has been excluded from
the dry buildable calculations for Lot 3 (Review exhibit E) Cook asks that
the drainage swale be at least 8 to 10' wide the whole length of the
drainage way. The developer has the option to either place riprap or
a storm sewer pipe in place of the swale ditch. In addition, the engineer
asks that the road plans show proposed grading changes adjacent to the
Zoning File #1232
February 2, 1988
Page 2 of 3
Stubbs Bay intersection. The final road plans and lot grading plans must
reflect the following changes:
1. Bank at west side adjacent to Stubbs Bay Road to be graded out.
2. Ditch bottom set 3' below existing center line at property line.
3. Back slope graded to a 3 to 1 slope.
4. Bituminous flumes provided to drain the curb section at Stubbs
Bay Road.
The MCWD has confirmed that the prop-l:ed drainage system will meet the
standards of the Water Shed District- no drainage will leave the site %hen
developed at a greater rate then it does in its present undeveloped state.
Staff has enclosed a plat of the surrounding neighborhood (Exh. H),
designating approximate location of houses, boundaries of individual
properties and surrounding road locations. At a minium staff has
recommended access to the east lot line be provided for a future
connector/through road to Leaf Street. Ncte 40+ undeveloped acres within
RLS 843 a� the east quadrant of the map. There is no more than 1 to 1 1/2
acre of wetland within the entire property with a protential development
density of 20 lots. The Planning Commission has supported staffs request
for the extension corridor.
Planning Commission Recommendation
To approve the 5 lot plat preliminary subdivision application of Betz
Builders Inc, and Clement C. Kroll finding all pertinent standards of the
on site septic code, RR-lB Zoning District and subdivison regulations of
the City have been satisfied and grants a variance for the creation of a
private road finding the placement and the design of the road will provide
safe use for the public who use the road way.
Approval is subject to the following condtions:
1. Applicant/Owner to grant road and utility easements over road
outlot and extension outl.ot.
2. Excution of maintance covenants to include ownership and
maintance responsibility for all benefiting lots.
3. Drainage ditch between lots 2 and 3, block 1 must he R to 10'
wide the whole length of the drainage ditch. (Applicant has the
option to either riprap drainageway or install storm sewer pipe).
Zoning File #1232
February 2, 1988
Page 3 of 3
4. Final road plans to be amended as follows:
a. bank at west side adjacent to Stubbs Bay Road, be graded out.
b. ditch bottom be set 3' below existing center line at property
line.
c. back slope graded 3 to 1 slope.
d. bituminous flumes provided to drain the curb section at Stubbs
Bay Road.
5. Payment of Park fee of $600.00 (3 lots at $200.00 each).
6. All existing curb cuts serving the subject property cease use
upon installation of an approved gravel base within the private road
ou' lot .
The inclosed resolution has been drafted for council review and action
per the Planning Commission recommendation noted above.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FOR THOMAS R. BETZ
AND MICHAEL C. KROLL
FILE NO. 1232
WHEREAS, Thomas R. Betz and Michael C. Kroll (hereinafter "the
applicants"), on November 20th, 1987 filed a formal subdivision
application with the City of Orono for a division o'.-* five lots of a
property legally described as Lots 41 and 42, Auditors Subdivision No. 203,
Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and
WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with
Minnesota Statues 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and
Platting Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held public hearings on
December 21, 1987 and January 27, 1988, at which times all persons desiring
to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunit- to speak
thereon; and
WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on February 8th, 1988, the
Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of applicants,
noting the following findings of fact:
1. The property is located within the RR-lB Single Family Rural
Residential zoning district requiring a minimum of 2 acres of
contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot.
2. The property contains a total of approximately 22 acres. The
retention pond consists of 1.2,595 s.f. or .28 acres in area and shall
be excluded from the dry buildable areas of the subdivision.
3. The proposed plat contains 5 lots each exceedinc, the 2 acre
minimum lot area requirement.
4. A 1 1 5 lots sha 1 1 be served by a private road. The location and
curb cut for the private road that intersects at Stubbs Bay Road has
been approved by the City Engineer.
5. All lots meet the required 200' width adjacent to the read and at
the rear of the front yard setback line. A single femily residence
can be constructed on all proposed lots without the need for any
variances.
6. Septic testing has confirmed that the newly proposed four lots
contain adequate and suitable soils for on -site sewage disposal
systems. Lot 1, Block 2, the developed lot, contains adequate area
and suitable soils to provide for an alternate sewage disposal system.
Page 1 of 4
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon either one or more
of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby
approves the preliminary plat application of Thomas R. Betz and Michael C.
Kroll per plat drawings by Mark S. Gronberg of Coffin and Gronberg, Inc.
dated October 12, 1987 and revised for the Planning Commis6ion meeting of
January 27, 1988, and further grants a variance to the standard that would
require that all lots have frontage on a public road with the creation of
the private road, subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to the issuance of building permits for new construction,
the final plat must be filed with the Hennepin County Recorder's
Office, road base and drainageway installed and approved by the City,
and, if required improvements are not completed at the time of final
plat approval the developer must execute a Developer's Agreement and
port a letter of credit (150% of the cost of the remaining
improvements).
2. Required Improvements:
A. Private road to be constructed per standards set forth in
Section. 11.33, Subdivisions 4 and 5. Revised engineering plans
must be approved by City prior to any construction. Per the City
Engineer, the final road and grading plans must be amended as
follows:
i. Bank at west side, adjacent to Stubbs Bay Road, bf
graded out.
ii. Ditch bottom set 3' below existing center line at
property line.
iii. Back slope graded 3:1.
iv. Bituminous flumes provided to drain the curb section at
Stubbs Bay Road.
B. Existing residence within Lot 1, Block 2 shall be Served by
new plat road when base has been installed - -' approved by the
City and the existing access off Old Stubbs B•. --Dad closed.
C. Site grading at the time of road construction to include
installation of drainageway within shared lot lines of Lot 2,
Block 1, and Lot 3, Block 1. Drainage swale must be 8-10' wide
(applicants have option of either installing rip rap or a
drainage pipe).
D. Prior to road construction and site grading, all drainfield
sites must be staked in order to protect them from the earth
moving equipment.
Paqe 2 of 4
3. Final. Submittals: ;lie following list of final submittals must be
submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly
scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the
month:
A. RECORD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and
one (1) copy reduced to 1"=200'. Drawing to include:
a) Lot lines platted Per preliminary survey by Mark S.
Gronberg dated October 12, 1987 and revised for the Planning
Commission meeting of January 27, 1988.
b) Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' wide
along all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of
internal property lines. Drainage easement between shared
lot lines of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 to be designated at 15'
on either side of the shared lot line.
c) Describe the retention pond within Lot 3, Block 1 in
angles and bearings and as a draiaage easer.lent.
d) Designate road outlots as follows:
i. Private road as Outlot A;
ii. Extension c-oriidor as Outlot B.
B. LEGAI. DOCUMENTS required:
a) Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners,
mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated
therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected
by such interest.
b) The applicant must provide certified copies of all
recorded easements currently affecting the property.
c) Signed and executed "Flowage and Conservation Easement"
over drainage easements within the plat.
(I) Signed and executed "Road and Utility Easements" over
th, private road outlot and the future access outlot.
e) Signed and executed "Declaration of Private Road
Easement and Declaration for Maintenance of Same". Note:
need to amend for ownership purposes.
f) Signed and executed "Developer's Agreement" and "Letter
of Credit." for all required improvements not completed prior
to final plat approval.
Faye 3 of 4
q) Completed "Application for Private Road Name". Please
note that this is a separate approval by the Council and
should be submitted prior to the final plat approval crate.
C. FEES TO BE PAID: Total Due $900.00
a) Park dedication fee per current schedule:
$200.00 x 3 = $600.00.
b) Final plat fee - $150.00
c) Legal review and filing fees of $150.00.
Adopted •.he City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at. a
regular meeting h this 8th day of February, 1988.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Cle:r
James R. Grabek, Mayor
Paqe 4 of i
rr
Date Rec'
By
Rec'
CITY OF ORONO
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM r
-----------------------------------------------------------------------�-1--
APPLICANT Name jVic. T Z 1KI 1 L 0!' Telephone
Mailing Address �_� /�C,�'ri�� 1��' i�fl �e��i'�lit A" Syjs J
PROPERTY Name)) Telephone
OWNER
Mailing Address
(Attach list if more than one)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPERTY LOCATION
Street Address (0611 ,n 616<.��
Property Identification No. (P.l.u.)
Complete Legal Description to be attached to application
------------------ --- ------ ---------------------------------«
L ! I 1 L'1 1 'I
EXISTING LAND USE F.1 N E OFFICE
ember of T-x Parcels
01 BEN 2,50.00
Development Size �" �� F.cres Dry Land nwr t: `C.Vv
Acres wet Land 14E4Eh7-TH4NA' YOU
P.cres Total., all p&rcel$.",40 C041 .?01 7:1:3S
Present Use (che(:k) Residential; no. of units
�:11:her (specify)
Present Zoning District
PROPOSAL — Division for Tax Pur,
_ Lot ,'ine Rearrangemt_ only (no new building sites)
_ Subdivision for New !-':'lding Sites
Number of Building Sites:
Proposed Gross Density
Minimum Lot Size:
Proposed Use: 'check)
Existing Units
New Units
Total Units
Units per Acres
-e Ffet Dry Buildable
_ Residential
Other (specify)
(OVI:,
MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION
1. Application Completed
2. Pr 'iminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey.
3. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be
obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government
Center 348-3271)
4. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the
above list with no return address.
Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is
complete.
Zoning Officials Signature Date
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments)
2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat.
3. Title opinion.
4. Easements, Covenants, etc.
5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security.
Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is comple
Zoning Officials Signature Date
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEES
Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II a 1II) $150.00
Preliminary Review (Class I & II subdivisions) $250.00
Preliminary Review $300.00 plus
(Class III and all non-residential) 20.00/lot
_ Final Plat Review (Class III) $150.00*
*(Plus any legal or engineering c.' -ges)
----------------------------------------------..--------------------------
F.pplicant has read the above and hereby agrees to F :. •:: le all information required
or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Env r, City Attorney, Planning
Commission and Council necessary to process this :,. : cat inn and furth« agrees
to pay all additional fees established by ord::rc,,•
----------------------- -t- ,9--�,
------
Applicant's Signatum "/ �'� / Date
Owner's :signature I Z Date
Applicant. must hive all submittals into the C_i~, s 25 days before the
Planniaq Commitsion Meeting. Panning Commissi: i:igs are usually held on
the thirst Mondav of each month.
RUN DATE 11/09/87
BATCH 004
38 05-117-23 21 0014
PROP ADDR 03620 EILEEN ST
OWNER NAME S 3 L WHITMAN
TAXPAYER STEPHEN T WHITMAN
NAME/ADDR 3620 EILEEN ST
ORONO MH 55359
38 32-118-23 43 0006
PROP ADDR 03565 WATERTOWN RD
OWNER NAME D M OURN ET AL W/L EST
TAXPAYER DORALINE M DLNN
NAME/ADDR 3565 WATERTOWN ROAD
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 32-118-23 43 0009
PROP ADDR 03445 WATERTOWN RD
O:.IER NAME R T QUADY ETAL
TAXPAYER ROBERT T QUADY
NAME/ADDR 3445 S WATERTOWN PD
LONG LAKE MN 55356
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY IM'ORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNER- LIST
38 32-118-23 34 0006
JOHN F DLNN
JOHN F DU N
20 S BROWN RD
P 0 BOX 77
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 32-118-23 43 0007
03505 WATERTOWN RD
M FOLEY A I JOSEPHSON
MICHAEL H FOLEY AND
ILONA R JOSEPHSON
3505 WATERTOWN RD
ORONO K4 55356
38 32-118-23 43 0010
03425 WATERiOWN RO
WANDA L PETERSEN
WANDA L PETERSEN
3425 WATERTOWN RD
LONG LAKE MN 55356
PROP ADOR 38 32-118-23 34 0011
OWNER NAME 3685 WATERTOWN RD
TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH 004 00027 THOMAS JOHN MAXWELL
NAME/ADDR THOMAS JOHN MAXWELL
3685 WATERTOWN RD
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55358
REPORT NO. PI415401
PAGE e
38 32-118-23 43 0005
03535 WATERTOWN RD
ROBERT E ROBERTSON i WIFE
ROBERT E ROBERTSON
3535 WATERTOWN RD
LONG LAKE MN 55356
39 32-118-23 43 0008
03465 WATERTOWN RD
GERALD KVIST ETAL
GERALD KVIST
POBOX 81
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 32-118-23 44 0007
03405 WATERTOWN RD
WARD FERRELL ETAL
WARD FERRELL
3405 WATERTOWN RD
LONG LAKE MN 55356
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE
RFPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION 15 IT APPEAFS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST
OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. l I
DATE11- V -'6T BY
IZQ
RUN DATE 11/09/87
BATCH 004
38 05-117-23 11 0002
PROP ADOR 03405 HIGH LA
OWNER NAME CYRIL L DUCHARME ETAL
TAXPAYER CYRIL L DUCHARME
NAME/ADDR 3405 HIGH LANE
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 05-117-23 12 0007
PROP ADDR 00100 STUBBS BAY RD S
OWNER NAME BETZ BUILDERS INC
TAXPAYER BETZ BUILDERS INC
NAME/ADDR 15301 HIGHWAY 55 W
PLYMOUTH MN 55447
3b 05-1i:-23 12 0010
PROP ADDR 03580 BAYSIDE RD
U-14ER NAME V E NO;TON ETAL
TAXPAYER VICTOR E HORTON
NAME/ADDR 3580 BAYSIDE ROAD
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 05-117-23 12 0013
PROP ADDR 00200 BEDERWOOD DR
C' 41ER NAME K C THOMAS ETAL
TAXPAYER JOANN W GUSTAFSON
HAME/ADDR 200 BEDERWO00 DRIVE
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 05-117-23 12 0017
PROP ADDR 03415 HIGH LA
09NER NAME RICHARD G MARKL111O
TAXPAYER RICHARD G MARKLUND
NAME/ADDR 3415 HIGH LANE
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 05-117-23 13 0005
PROP ADDR
O"14ER NAME C- L GUSTAFSON ETAL
TAXPAYER GERALD L GUSTAFSON
NAME/ADDR 200 BEDERWOOD OR
LONG LAKE MN 5535E
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 05-117-23 11 0005
00095 LEAF ST
E C GRAHAM JR ETAL
E C GRAHAM JR
95 LEAF ST
LONG LAKE MH 55356
38 05-117-23 12 0008
00060 STUBBS BAY RD S
CLEMENT C KROLL ETAL
CLEMENT C KROLL
60 STUBBS BAY RO S
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
38 05-117-23 12 0011
00165 BEDERW000 OR
GEORGE S TLRP
GEORGE S TERP
165 BEDERWOOD OR
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 05-117-23 12 'J014
03420 HIGH LA
H W WOLVERTON ETAL
H WESLEY WOLVERTON
3420 HIGH LANE
LONG LAKE MN lS3S6
38 05-117-23 13 0003
FLORIAN J STERNER ETAL
FLORIAN J STERNER
5429 ALDRICH AVE 50
MPLS MN 55419
38 05-117-23 13 0011
002 " BEDERWOOD DR
G R J TAFSON
GERALD GUSTAFSON
200 BEDS DRIVE
LONG LAKE 55356
REPORT NO. PI435401
PAGE 7
38 05-117-13 12 0001
03445 HIGH LA
ALMOND N KPEB ETAL
ALMOND N KREB
34,45 HIGH LANE
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 05-117-23 12 0009
00040 STUBBS BAY RD S
WELDON H DUNN ETAL
WELDON H DUNN
40 STUBBS BAY RD
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
38 05-117-23 12 0012
00185 BEDERWOOD DR
P D 3WA143014 A M C SWANSON ;
NEAL ANDERSON
130 CYGNET PLACE -T
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 05-117-23 12 0016 -
STATE OF MINN
STATE OF MIt:4
38 05-117-23 13 0004
G L GUSTAFSON ETAL
GERALD L GUSTAFSON
200 BEDERWOOD DR
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 05-117-23 21 0011
03640 BAYSIDE RD
HERBERT T OLSON i WIFE
HERBERT i JANE OLSON
3640 BAYSIDE RD
LONG LAKE MN 55356
I
m
' :, � Jet. -�' C•") C�
or
00
r� i
3 L
.7.
CLI
'� 1N•. ir.I I. � i1•
]vo ' I
sm
)s,o i4\ b) I 'b 'Yl
7J I •
——
(t, (,A)
CF I 1.
05,jh7
��FOFc� o ,' EGIST .
.Qr ERED LAND SUF
S hl
OO •+s 1�
JL
< • , MA i �rp4
I I L 1 (r ,l ,
QA_
`'li � _ ._ �� i �r�%tE►1 i � Its; h\ � �. a° �If' . • t ..
MAIIR ELI li,U4:AY' r
MIN
y4 , +
'lE0 OAS iN
M I N N E H A H A CREEK E„� NINNEiO;!IN,
OEC 141987
WATERSHED DISTRICT P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 w. -
IOW OF MANWItt David H Cochran, Res • Albert L Lehman • John E Thomas
Camille D Andre • James R Spensley • Ibchard R Miller •Michael R Carroll
Permit Application No.: 87-226 December 18, 1987
Owner: Betz Builders, Inc.
415 Deborah Drive
Maple Plain, MN 55359
Location: City of Orono, Sec. 5AB
Purpose: Stormwater Management Plan for construction of a road for a 5 lot
subdivision.
Dear Sirs:
At the regularly scheduled December 17, 1987 meeting of the Board of Managers,
the subject permit application was reviewed. Action was taken allowing the
District staff to issue your permit only after receipt and staff approval of the
following:
1. Revised plan showing culvert inverts under the roe:d and at the pond outlet.
2. Review and approval by the City of Orono.
Please be advised that the project is not authorized until the above has been
submitted to me and you have been notified of permit issuance from the Minnehaha
Creek Watershed District. Should you have any questions regarding this matter,
please contact me at 473-4224.
Very truly yours,
EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES
Engineers for the District
Kevin C. Larson, Engineer
cc: Board
L. Smith
Coffin 8 Gronberg
City of Orono
V
t roo
AflBones
Rosene
`-�
Anderlik &
Associates
Engineers & Architects
December 15, 1987
City of Orono
Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Att :: Ms. Jeenre Mabusth
Otto G Bonestrop, PE
Keith A Gordon, PE
Thomas W Peterson. PE
Charles A Errrkson
Robert W Rosene, PE
RKhafd W poster, PE
MKhaP, C Lynth. PE
Leo M Pawelsky
Joseph C Anderhk. PE
Donald C 8u.gardt. PE
James R mmand. PE
Hanan M Olson
Bradford A Lemberg, PE
Jerry A Bourdon, PE
Kenneth P Anderson, PE
Susan M Ebernn
RKhard E Turner. FE
Mark A Hanson, PE
Keith A Bachmann, PE
Mark A Serp
James C Olson, PE
Ted K Field. PE
Mark R Rolls. PE
Glenn R Cook, PE
MKhael t Rautmann, PE
Roben C Russek. A I A
Thomas E Noyes. PE
Robert R Pfefferle. PE
Thomas E Angus. PE
Robert G SchunKht. PE
David O Loskota, PE
Howard A Sanford. PE
Marvin L Survala, PE
Re: File No. 139-1232 Betz Addition
Dear Jeanne,
OEG 1 8 W7
We have reviewed the preliminary plat and grading plan submitted on the Betz
Addition. The preliminary plat should indicate drainage and utility easements
along lot lines. Drainage easements should also be provided over the ponding
area.
The drainage calculations should be provided for the storm sewer and pond
area. The storm sewer profile and the pond outlet control structure details
should be provided. The drainage ditch should be designed to minimize erosion
problems.
The roadway bank on the west side abutting Stubbs Bay Road should be graded
out. The ditch bottom should be set 3 feet below the existing centerline at
the property line. The backslope shall be graded to a 3:1 slope. Bituminous
flumes should be provided to drain the curb section at Stubbs Bay Road.
If you have any questions, please contact this office.
Yours very truly,
BONESTROC, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC.
Glerin R. Cook
GRC:li
24
233S West Highway 36 9 St Paul, Minnesota 5S113 • 612-636-4600
Bonestroo
Rosene
Anderiik &
Associates
Engineers & Architects
January 12, 1988
City of Orono
Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Attn: Jeanne Mahusth
Re: 139-1232 Betz Builders
Dear Jeanne,
OtIn G Bonfslroo, PE
Krrtn A Gordon. PE
Thomas W Peterson. PE
Charles A Erickson
Robert W Rosene. PE
Richard W Foster. PE
Michael C Lynch, PC
Leo M Pa"` 'sky
Joseph C Anderhk. PE
Donald C Burgardt. PC
James R Maland. PC
Harlan M Olson
Bradfotd A Lemberg. PE
Jerry A Bourdon, PE
Kenneth P Anderson, PE
Susan M Eberhn
RK hard E Turner, PE
Mart A Hanson, PE
m
Keith A Bachann. PE
Mark A Serp
m
Jaes C Olson, PE
Ted K Field, PE
Mark R Rolfs. PE
Glenn R Cook. PE
Michael I Rautmann PE
Robert C Russek. AIA
Thomas E Noyes, PE
Robert R Pfefferle. PE
Thomas E Angus. PE
Robert G Schunrcht. PE
David O Loskota, PE
Howard A Sanford, PE
Marvin L Sorvala. PE
We have reviewed the grading plan submitted for the Betz Addition. The plan
as submitted is acceptable with the following exceptions.
The drainage ditch between lots 2 and 3 should be graded wide enough to con-
trol the storm aster discharge velocity to 5 feet per second. The placement
of riprap or a storm sewer line in place of the ditch would also be accept-
able. The plan should show the proposed grading on Stubbs Bay Road. The plan
should also show the bituminous spillways from the street to the ditch on
Stubbs Bay Road.
If you have any questions, please contact this office.
Yours very truly,
BCNESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK b ASSOCIATES, INC.
k
Glenn R. Cook
GRC:br
2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 0 612-636-4600
PRELIMINX:rf PLAT FOR
BETZ BUILDERS
-OF LOTS '4i'k.42, AUDITOR'S SUB.,No.. ioi,
ICNNEPtN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Oft A
0
W
C,
'A
7. Til N.
Zz
go
00 400.
,> 'C1"- 60
CAALE TE lo lz 47, COFFIN a GRONBERG, Nc.
LOO "VEYOPS AND PLANNERS
DATUM. NOW 50 TA
i
CJ
P ROJEC T `
low
�' �M---,
COF FRV 8k GRONBERG, IN
AM
E. N61WERS, i 4000 SURVE nqc v; .%Mf#f ow`
i I _
iEC. 32, T. 118, R. 23 E0E1vED pECEIYED
W
t Mo, MECE6YED
V � O
M 1�
i00
BA r
L aw�,.Kt
im am
ow r1hol. .
�4
f 11U6Gil � ETING
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
FEB -8 M9
Planning Commission Chairman Kelley L��i �F 0�0�
nrono Planning ,_*ommission Members
City Administrator Bernhardson
Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
January 12, 1988
#1234 John & Lynn Dougan, 2785 White Oak Circle -
Renewal Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing
Zoning Distr-rt - RR-1B
Pertinent Ordinance -
Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 - Conditional use permit
excavate a retention pond for flood control purposes.
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A -
Exhibit B -
Exhibit C -
Exhibit D -
Exhibit E -
Exhibit F -
Exhibit G -
Exhibit H -
Exhibit I -
Exhibit J -
Exhibit K -
Exhibit L -
Exhibit M -
Application
Property Owners List
Plat Map
Wetlands
Watershed/Drainage
Staff Memos of Pre'luus Review (1(,/86)
Planning Commission of 10/20/86
Council Minutes of 11/10/86 and 11/24/86
Marier Letter Dated 11/23/86
MCWD Letter
Resolution No. 2083
required to
Stiff Sketch Locating Drainage/'Other Improvements in
Area
Staff Sketch of Proposed Land Plteratior.s
The applicant ek approval of their-riginal application approved in
the fall of 1986, __ease review Exhibi F, the staff memos reviewing
Application No. 192.
Briefly to review, as before the City staff cannot confirm that the
proposed land alterations will solve the problems of the applicants. The
land alteration involves the removal of approximately 472 cubic yards of
fill. Portions of the spoils will be used to excavate and fill around the
(+rainage swale to the Past of the retention pond. The east outlet cf the
pond is at the 97.3 elevation. The top of the Swale will be approximately
97.9. The Swale will range in depth beginning at the west edge from 1/2 to
1 foot as it approaches the eastern edge. Review Exhibit M, fill will be
placed along the sides of the Swale, Fpeuifica" ly around the drainfield
area in an attempt to keep the overf:ow drainage from flowinv over into the
area of the drainfield site. Please note the major retention area to the
east will not receive any fill and will remain undisturbed.
The proposed land alteration will not impede the natural drainage as
proposed but applicants hope will keep temporary runoff of surface
drainageway from drainfield area and still provide the -etention along the
east side of the property before entering the Marier propt�?rty.
'oning File #1234
.:anuary 11, 1988
Page 2 of 2
In the Council's review in
1986, they
noted that portions of the
land
alteration may involve public improvements
within the right-of-way of
Old
Crystal Bay Road. In addition
to asking
that the applicant's execute
a
Developer's Agreement to ensure
that the work
is correctly performed,
they
also asked for a Hold Harmlf . ,
Agreement.
In the first review, the
City
agrc,id that the City Engineer
would draft
the legal description for
a
C-,>nservation and Flowage Easement to be
taken over the pond and
the
arair -+ge swa le.
Staff would add to the conditions of the firs} review that a final
g ding plan be also submitted to prevent any nF?ati✓e impact on this
so i.sitive draina_,e a;.; -a. Staff would also advise applicant that there
would br• no additional fill allowed. Portions of the 472 cubic yards of
spoils can ��e used subject to final. review of the grading plan.
Staff Recommendation -
To approve th- 1 conditional use permit appl cation of John and
Lvrr ougan that woL� jw the installation of a retention pond involving
ho emova 1 of appror _ .e—te ly 472 cubic yards of fill, portions of which
all be used for filling in a -.)roved areas of the property, subject to the
i _ lowing co:ditions:
1. Prior to issuance of a general permit for the land alters onc,,
the following must be submitted b) ; applicants to the City:
a) Exec, - of a Developer's Agreement plus postina of a Letter
of Credo,, for one year (amount to be determined by City
Engineer);
b) Execution of a Hold Harmless Agreement;
c) Execution of a Conservation 3 Flowage Easement over pond plus
drainage swa1P (City Engineer to prcvide legal description);
d) F! a.al grading plan showing areas tc be f 1 led wit,t r,,.rryts in
leva ions noted on pJ an. No additional f i 1 � is , o ;.:.e brouoo
tc, filling is 1 imiced to the 472 cubic yar,.s i�cavater
pond, any fill to be transported from site sh, 1 be conducted
daring the daily time period beginning at 7:30 a.m. tc 5:30 p.m.
Monday through Friday only.
Zoning File #1234
Additional Comments and Planning Commission Recommendation
February 3, 1988
The Planning Commission questioned the limitations of the hold
harmless aqreement required by the Council at the time of the first review.
Co,•n-il was concerned that the work to be performed both on the applicant's
property and within the right-of-way of Old Crystal Bay Road presented
potential liability for the City if another property within the watershed
was to sustain damage after the -Iteration.
The applicant has confirme, _iat the invert culvert within Old Crystal
Ba.v Road will not be altered as a part of this application. The original
hold harmless agreement was to be tied into the Developer's Agreement that
was to be effective for only one year upon completion of the installation
of the pond. The Planning Commission felt the hold harmless should be
permanent and a separate instrument filed against the property and not
tied to the Developer's agreement.
Please note V --ougan need not fulfill any of the conditions of this
resolution until jpplies for the land alteration permit for the
pond/swale installation.
The planning Commission adopted staffs approval recommendation of the
renewal application subject to amending the condition that would ask for a
permanent hold harmless agreement. The enclosed resolution has been
drafted per the Planning Commission recommendation.
City of OR ONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19
FILE #1234
WHEREAS, John F. Dougan (hereinafter "the applicant") is the
owner of the property located at 2785 White Oak Circle within the City of
Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows:
Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1447, Hennepin County, Minnesota
(hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a
Conditional Use Permit to permit gradin and excavation of a retention pond
and swale for flood control purposes, per Municipal Zoning Code Section
10.03, Subdivision 19.
NOW, '"''EREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning Fil- #1234.
2. The pi..,perty is lecaced in the RR-lB Single Family Rural
Resi,.ential Zoning District.
3. On January 27, � 988, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the
application as prop )sed and recommended approval, finding that:
A) The applicant's property suffers flooding on an occasional
basis. The property is relatively low within the watershed and
the property is nearly level from west to east, hence drainage
from the steeper watershed upstream slows down and accumulates on
applicant's property.
B) The drainageway through applicant's property is not a
designated wetland.
C) The applicant's drainfield is within the area that is
occasionally flooded and is affected adversely during such
periods.
Page 1 of 4
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
X
D) The combination of pond excavation and associated fill to
direct the drainage away from applicant's drainfield may have
some beneficial effect on the rainfield but might not solve the
back yard flooding problem withcut a more comprehensive project
including neighboring properties downstream. The applicant has
acknowledged that this project may not solve the entire flooding
prohiem.
E) The applicant has obtained the required permit from the
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District.
4. Work done by private property owners which was tacitly allowed by
the City, which resulted in channelization of portions of -he upstream
watershed, may be contributing to some degree to the rater of run-off
reaching applicant's property.
5. The proposed grading and excavation will have no anticipated
effect on the watershed upstream of the property, and is expected to
have no significant effect on nutrient retention or rates or amounts
of run-off downstream frcm the property.
6. The City Council haE considered this applicaticn including the
findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by
staff and comments of the applicant and the effect of the proposed use
on the health, safety and welfare of the community.
7. The City Council finds that granting a Conditional U!;e Permit tc
allow the grading and excavation of a retention pond and swa le will
not be detrimental to the health, safety or general ael.fare of the
public, would not ad vers=ly affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard
or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate
surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the
property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the
Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based
upon one or more of the
above findings, the Orono
City
Council hereby
grants a Conditional Use
Permit per Municipal Zoning
Code
Section 10.03,
Subdivision 19 to permit
the grading and excavation
of a
retention pond
and swale fer flood control
purposes, subject to
the
following conditions:
1. Pri.or to the City issuing a land alteration permit to the
applicant, the applicant :rust complete the following:
A) Execute a Developer's Agreement and provide a letter of
credit (City to determine the am.-)unt of the letter o` credit) to
1,e effe^tive for one year,
Page 2 of 4
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
B) Execution of a Flowage & Conservation Easement over the pond
and swale (legal description for easement to be provided by
City).
C) Grading plans for pond/swale and additional filling adjacent
to drainfield area designating proposed and existing contou_rs9
Applicant is limited to the use of spoils removed from pond an
swale excavation.
D) Execute a permanent Hold Harmless Agreement for the proposed
land alteration.
2. Applicant must apply for the renewal of the original M.C.W.D.
permit.
3. The disturbed areas shall be re -vegetated as soon as possible
following the completion of the grading work.
4. All fill to be transported from site shall be conducted during the
daily time period beginning at 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., " .nday througl.
Friday or:ly.
5. Authorities granted by this conditional use permit run with the
property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be
exercised by application for a land alteration permit within one year
of the date of Council approval, or this conditional use permit will
expire on that date (February 8, 1989).
6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and condi-
tions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning
code. shall automatically terminate any authority -granted herein, and
shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
7. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees
to the tPrmG of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs,
successors and assigns, hereby agrees to th� recording of this
resolution in the cha4.n of title of the property.
1988. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this Bth day of February,
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Eallin, City Clerk J.,meS R. `-,ek, Mayor
Property Owner(s)
Page 3 of 4
4 ! 41 /•lc ." Date Rec'd // ; S
ree
�lff. r �; � ► � �, ����.tv �,7 Receipt _
/ Initials,��
CI OF, OROwO r �D
GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPERTY LOCATION
Site Address
Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)
Please check one - Is the property abstract or t.orrens?
(for Conditional Use Applications only)
Please attach legal description to application if not included on
required survey. ---"V r.. r.
---------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT Phone (home) y -j �71�� Trr
Y VL'VV �f
Name J-p%r-) t rc�� I )o c�;�. rl Phone (work) 9141
11A
Lill L_ 1L'i�•VV
Address e OO-.kCaNcle �� City Z��;,
-------------------------------------------------------- `----_-iiii _ Ti
+
OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)
.. a,f
Name Phone
Address
Date Property Acquired
City zip
(month/year)
I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
$100.00 a) Residentii.. accessory Use
$150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.)
$150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg
$250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use
$200.00 f) Land Alteration
Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more
Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of
lakeshore
PRD/PID - see fee E-.chedule
OTHER APPLICATIONS
_ $150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees)
$250.00 Vacation
$150.00 Easement Vacation
$ 50.00 Easement Vacation with Subdivision
$250.00 I:ezonirg
$200.00 Appeals
Other - see fee schedule
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
Present Zoning District
Present Use of Property Residential
Other (specify)
-------------------------------- ------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
Describe request in detail:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
1. Completed Application Form.
2. Certified Property Owners List of owne within 350' (you can obtain
this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government
Cernter 348-3271)
3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names
on the above list with no return address.
4. Certificate of survey.
5. Construction plan, if applicable.
6. Plat Map.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please
remember that your application is not complete if the above information has
not been included.
Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete.
Zoning Officials Signature Date
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or
requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or
unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that
the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her
knowledge.
Applicant's signature / < LDate
OWNERS SIGNATURE
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further
authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants,
agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of
investigation and verificat' n of thi request.
owner's signature Z�' `-—` Date
Applicant must have all submittals into the C, - offices 25 days before the
Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the
third Monday of each month. Applic.ar. _s must be present at all scheduled
review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, and, if an
applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, to pleas- make
arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise
the Building s Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting.
I
. 7:ATE 09/03/86
=TCH 010
38 04-117-23 24 0004
rVCP AOOR 00405 OLD CRYST+,L BAY RO S
r'._•:cA NAME LEON G WARNER
-AYER WARREN DALEN
405 S OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 04-117-23 31 0003
Pc^P AOOR 00505 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S
r� sR NAME GERTRUDE HENTSCHEL
TAXPAYER GERTRUDE B HENTSCHEL
NAME/ADOR 505 SO OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 04-117-23 42 0015
P 0P A00P 02775 WHITE OAK CIR
NA-E LESTER J MARIER
TAYPAYEP L JAMES MARIER
r.ArE/ADOR 2775 WHITE OAK CIRCLE
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 04-117-23 42 0013
PROP AMR 02760 WHITE OAK CIR
NAME L P HUNT i C C HUNT
TAXPAYER C C HUNT t L PEDERSEN-HUNT
NAME/ADOR 2760 WHITF OAK C-^CLE
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 04-117-23 42 0025
rv0P ACOR
CWNER NAME ELIZABETH B SPENCER
TAXPAYER JOHN C CONNELL
Nt"E/ADDR C/O RICHARD A HACKETT
3400 CITY CTR 33 SO 6TH ST
MPLS MN 55v02
HENNE.IN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
36 04-117-23 31 0001
00425 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S
W A P LAWTON
OR WILLIAM G LAWTON
425 OLD CRYSTAL SAY RD
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 04-117-23 31 0004
COS35 OLD CRYSTAL DAY RD S
ROBERT S BRAt=N ETAL
ROBERT S BRANSON
535 S OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD
LONG LAKE '4 55356
38 04-117-23 42 0016
02790 WHITE OAK CIR
P 8 M DOHEPTY
PATRICK J DOHERTY
279U WHITE OAK CIRCLE
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 04-117-23 42 OC23
00540 OLD CRYSTAL SAY RD S
ELIZABETH B SPENCER
GEORGE FUNK/JUDY ROGOSHESKE
540 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S
LONG LAKE MN 55356
TOTAL BATCH O10 00013
REPORT NO. PI435401
PAGE 25
�,8 04-117-23 31 0002
00435 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD 5
JOHN B BALOGH ET AL
NANCY STRICKLAND-BALOGH
435 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 04-117-23 42 0014
02785 WHITE OAK. CIR
J i L OOUGAN
JOHN F i E LYNN DOUGAN
2785 WHITE GAK CIRCLE
LONG LAKE MH 55356
38 04-117-23 42 0017
02780 WHITE OAK CIR
R d J KLING
RICHARD A JOAN M KLING
2780 WHITE OAK CIRCLE
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 04-117-23 42 0024
ELIZABETH B SPENCER
PAUL T OGLAWj
3°55 WATERTO N RD
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
_,
193
CUTE 09/ 03/%
E•-'H 010
HENNEPIN COMITY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTr M4ERS LIST
REPORT NO. PI435401
PAGE 26
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE
REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY OEPARME T P OPE Y YAXATI TO THE BEST
OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF
GATE Y
do `
O's
t
sl�
1
1
1'e r
e`er S
n .ot 1!
•
,�, . LOT
• H
Q . '_.
le
68
1
. lot 17.y
.f
S,
N1/V
yr�
tw
C
O
•
>r� E ` ^
n .
t'n
M
zoo
QUO
v4
1
J
+h" ' 2644.44 Res.
'`Wig �'� �. � "�'� ��•
\ATh s
xe KtA_.
EAST 759.89 `� Z
429.89 -- — — —------33� �
r
o arc
ol
i• eb C
. � Z Z •4
g
4� 6 c
� 1
D
9ji3 396 89 EA5' 330 O on
31: N
v — {apt ia-- 'Y_ ii ��• �_—
Uff �� •AT I i.OT
TOWN k► x w 7 .
s; ROX STREET
N � +
a.
. h
r
TO: Mayor Butler
Mark Bcrnhardson, City Administrator
Orono Council Members
FROM: Michael P. Gaff ron, ,%ssi stant 'Zoning Admini st --itor
DATE: November 7, 1.986
5UBJ: #1082 John F. Dougan, 2785 White Oak Circle -
Condit;onal Use Permit - Resolution
List of Exhibitt
A - Memo an.. ,xhibts of 10/17/86
B - Planning Commission Minutes 10/20/86
C - Resolution
This :s a request to excaiate a storage pond and Swale for flood
ant rol purposes. Please review t,',e memo and eyhibits of
10/17/86. The Planning Commission at their 10/29i86 meeting
voted 4-0 to reconunend appiL val >-ubject tn applicant granting a
copse-vation and flowage easement ever th, pond area, and subject
to a developers ag t• ment siiice this s a sensitive area in the
watershed and might have some impact upstream if work is not
completed cord v.
rncilmember ( _i i lahan, 1 :_,ent at the Planning Commission
meeting, rpquest,d that staff investigate the work which was
previously done. upstream to detern,tine what effect that might hava
had on the curren-c runoff si'uation. Staff would note the
following:
1. There is i cul ver* u ei to Oak Circle ' st east of
the intersection with O. d C a! Bay Poacu. ii s ou 1 vent
drains approximately 1 acre c' 'property 790 White
Oak Cir-:�le. This would apt,. ar to be an insignificant
addition .,, the ova! al.' flow through Dougan's property, and
will not be affect ( by Dougan's project.
2. on the west i de o-" Old Crystal fj:�y Road, some grading
work wws done a few Years ago on the ,.*ton property at 42`�
Old Crys L i 1 Bay Road. Although no pertu.t was ever issuca by
t► -. n•ti.lding & Zoning : _rtment 'or .his work, fu3.lir Works
Cvt �atcr John Gerhart+.son nova. what this work w- ~ ao "a by
the property owner to clear tt.e existing drainageway w i,-tt
had gradilally filled in behind thr- drivew. - culve-t u.e
year- causing culveLt freeze up and and ! iiny problt .,
the Lawton pror-rty. According t-) John, there was nc
siy ,ant Chang.;, :n graces at the loca`ion. Our airphct,
bape -)s, taken in atc,ut 1970 (i.t_or to the crea'.. ion of
Wbit.! utak Circle), to s. t.+ mowed lawn area on •ithjr siee of
the Lawton dr i vewal ; which apYa T it l y yradua l ] y became too
wet to mow as the c,,lvert :`il led i,. un+- fropert;
ownetrs re -cleared I the drainageway. Th(r or, apparent
difference be*.wee• 0 and today is the 1' 2' wide
channe 1 nuw exist )n the Lawton prt j�c -tv, where our
airphotos show it i.ire been an unchanne1ized flow
pre iously. This ►,,.ay ha• a some effect on tte ve'oc4ty of
water reaching Dougan's property by moving onto Dougan's
faster tF,an it did previously.
T
Zoning File #1082
November 7, 198b
Page 2 of 2
It may be true that by tacitly allowing the regrading at 425 Old
Crystal Bay Road, the City may have contributed to Dougan's
problems to some degree.
Giver, facts and the facts presented in the staff memo of
10/17/86, staff recommends approval noting that even though the
proposed pond and swale project may not stop ponding of water on
Dougan's property, it may give some relief to the applicant's
dranfield area which is occasionally flooded. Staff recommends
that the applicant be required to execute a developer's agreement
and post suale fvzm of security, and grant both a drainage
easement and flowage and conservation easement over the project,
with legal description in this case to be provided by the City
Engineer.
A resolution for approval is attached for Council's review.
To: Mary R,jtler, Mayor
Mark '. Bernhardson, City Administrator
Orono Council_ Members
Orono Planning Commission Members
From: Michael P. Gaffron,
Asst Planning & Zoninq Administrator
Date: October 17, 1986
Subject: #1082 John F. Dougan, 2785 White Oak Circle -
Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing
Zoning District - RR-lB
Application - Conditional use permit for grading/excavating to create
a storage pond for flood control purposes.
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A - Application
Exhibit B - Plat Map
Exhibit C - Property Owners List
Exhibit D - Survey/Grading Plan
Exhibit E - Staff Letter 5/29/84
Exhibit F - MCWD Letter 8/26/86, Mcw�
Exhibit G - Topography of Sub -watershed Above Pond
Exhibit H - Air Photo Section
Description of need project - The applicants are proposing to create a
storage pond to collect runoff from the occasional "gully washer" that
inundates their backyard for 12 to 48 hour periods. The upstream
watershed has been calculates: by staff at about 17 acres, the runoff
from which is apparently very rapid due to steeper slopes upstream.
After flowing through the culvert under Old Crystal Bay Road the
watershed flattens out in Dougan's backyard, which is not a designated
wetland and which, prior to construction of the White Oak Circle
development, was cropland. There apparently exist some old
agricultural tiles which drain Dougan's backyard further to the Past,
and staff has surmised that these tiles, although not located, may be
near the surface. In a heavy rainfall, Dougan's backyard fills up to
as much as 12-18" deep with water, then in a period of 12 to 48 hours
it disappears without a clear overland channelization. We do know
that when the water gets high enough it flows eastward through
neighbor Marier's backyard and then southeast toward the cul-de-sac,
but there must be some underground tiling that removes the ponded
areas quickly.
Dougan's drainfi.eid is in a relatively low area west of the
house, and 18 adversely affected by the runoff ponding near it. The
proposal is to create a pond for storage near the culvert, then use
the spoils to fil 1 near the drainfield and create L afiale tc
channelise the water past the drainfield.
Zoning File #1082
October 17, 1986
Page 2 of 2
Discussion:
City Engineer, Glenn Cook has reviewed the grading plan on the
site, and althoug:. he generally has no problem with the proposal, he
has some reservations. Although he feels the project will not be
detrimental to the watershed, he feels it will not accomplish the
applicant's purpose of eliminating the backyard ponding at times when
the storage pond is already full of water. The fill to be placed next
to the drainfield may help the drainfield surface inundation
situation, although Glenn warns that the pond holding water Trost of
the time might have some effect on the drainfield because it is not a
free water surface with a need. And, there still may be occasional
ponding directly south of the house, and this will not solve Mariers
similar problem of having unchanneled flow overload through his
backyard near his drainfield. Glenn feels, and I concur, that a more
comprehensive swale and fill project would be beneficial to both
homeowners as a more permanent solution. The applicant is aware of
these concerns and realizes the proposal is not a cure-all.
Staff Recommendation:
From an overall watershed viewpoint, the project is
inconsequential and may even be of minor benefit by providing some
additional short-term storage area. Given that this is not a
designated wetland, and that it has been reviewed by the Watershed
District, staff has no problem recommending approval of the project.
However, applicant is advised that the project might not be the final
solution to the occasional pond in the backyard, and depending on the
level of the water in the pond at a given time, might have some impact
on the water table level near the drainfield.
P.C. 10•2 ,
2) DeAtri4f,w
A-,f.0'r( re h-)T
" f 1 r v K.. � A44,-L.
W
NINUTU'S OF THY: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD OCTOBER 20, 1966
11081 LONG CONTINULD
It was moved by Cha i r man Ka 1 ley, secon.led by [ie 1 lows, to
recommend approval based on staff's findings an:j the
following cunoitiuns:
1. must remove equivalent amounts of 0-75' hardcover
so that 0-73' hardcover remains at existin,3 level of
41.9'6 (1152 s.f.).
2. approve increase of hardcover in 75-250' from
43.14 to 43.7;.
;] )t ion, Ayes 4, I4ays 0.
1082jJOHN F. DOUGAN
WHITE OAK CIRCLE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PUBLIC HEARING 10:14 - 19:29
John Dougan was present for this matter.
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate o:: Mailing
was noted.
Assistant 'Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the
request to create a ponding area and Swale tc collect
runoff from the occasional "gully washer" that inundates
their backyard for 12 to 48 hour periods. He stated
that the City Engineer has reviewed the Elan, and
although he generally has no problem with the proposal,
he has some reservations that. it will solve the problem.
He noted that staff recommends requiring a developer's
agreement and granting a conservation & flowage
easement.
Mellows indicated concerns that this project w i i 1 not
suffice to correct the problems.
Assistant Zc;ning Administrator Gaffron stated that
applicant has been made aware of the concerns and
realizes that the proposal i.3 not a cure -ail.
14r. Dougan stated that the problems started after
work was done on the east and north of his property and
a culvert was put in two years ago.
i4o one was present from the public regardiny this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Goetten, to
recommend approval subject ta:
1. applicant signing a developers agreement.
2. grunting a conservation & flowage easement over
the pond and swale.
Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
IC
ft
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 10, 1986
#1001 LONG
CONTINUED
It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by
Councilmember Adams, to table this regLest directing
staff to work with applicar.c on alternat: ve plans and
bring back for Council roview at the November 24tr,
Council�l meeting. Motion, ;ayes 5, Nays 0.
#1082 JOHN
F. DOCGAN
2785 WHITE
OAR CIRCLE
CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT
RESOLUTION
,_10�ougan was not preserlL for this matter..
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request to
excavate a storage pond and swale for flood control
purposes. Staff and City Engineer Cook feels that the
proposal will not stop the ponding on the applicant's
property, however it will not aggravate the situation.
Councilmember Frahm stated that he felt that the
applicant should obtain written non -objection from the
neinhbor to protect the City's liability.
It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded by
Mayor Butler, to table this application pending comments
from the neighbor. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
#1084 ROBERT 14AXFIELD
4175 NORTH SHORE DRIVE
VARIANCE
RESOLUTION #2079
Robert Maxfield was present for this matter.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request to
allow a second residence to be constructed on a group of
commonly owned, separate tax parcels totaling 1.03 acres
in the LR-lB one acre zone. Tnere are 5 parcels in
total. The proposal is to keep 3 parcels totaling 0.57
acres (125' in width) with the Existing house and build
another house on the remaining 2 parcels totaling 0.46
acres (100' in width). He noted that the 5 parcels have
been assessed a total of two sewer units when sewer was
installed. He also noted that Hennepin. County has
approved the access.
Mayor Butler asked how these proposed lot sizes compare
with the general lot sizes of the neighborhood.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that they
are similar to the neighborhood lot sites. He noted
that the vacant 0.46 acre lot is larger than 29% of the
existing developed LR-IB properties.
8
ft-
MINUTES OF THE RI'.GULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 24, 1986
#1081 LONG CONTINUED
Councilmember Adams stated that he would like this
request tabled so he could review the property more
thoroughly.
Mr. Long noted that he wanted to rip -rip the shoreline
about 10 years ago and was denied ::)y the City, and now
he has lost 4-5' of shoreline credit from erosion.
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Mayor
Butler, to table this matter for further review.
Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 1. Councilmember Grabek voted nay.
11082 JOHN F. DOUGAN
2785 WHITE OAK CIRCLE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
RESOLUTION 12083
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for
a conditional use permit foi construction of a water
retention area. This request was tabled at the last
meet_ng pending a)a letter of non -objection from the
dowr;itream neighbor (Marier), b) 14r. Dougan's presence
at the meeting, and c) comments regarding drainage to a
dedicated drainage easement along White Oak Circle.
Mr. 5 Mrs. John Dougan were present for this matter.
Mr. Dougan submitted a letter of rion-objection from the
neighbor at 2775 White Oak Circle.
Mayor Butler read the letter of non -objection from Mr.
Marier into the record. Mayor Butler wanted to make
sure Mr. Dougan understood that this proposal may not
cure his problem.
Mr. Dougan stated that he understood this fact.
Assi-tant. Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the
drainage easement area and noted that staff recommends
requiring a developer's agreement.
It y• moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Courn ber Frahm, to adopt Resolution 02083 approving
the c Tonal use permit subject to providinq a Hold
Harnlc Agreement and Developer's Agreement., Motion,
Ayes 4, iys 0.
k
"4�V000e
/
Ir
IARR MIN1R?TONRA +�
P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 ,,,,,w t$OTA 91v(R
BOARD OF MANAGERS, David H Cochran. Prey . Albert L. Lehman -John E Thomas
Michael R Carroll •Camille D Andre .James 8 McWe;hy .James R Spensley
_.. _.. _I_!.`. ._ .y._.. '.: ..6'.-atL. '.':•'-'_'T..�::"",i'_Z.+�'iZ:Oi'. "1�[it•-��.....e_�:,il-.� .. :'.:..'l®�_ '��.1
Permit ,'oplication No: 86-137 Date: August 26, 1986
Owner: John Dougan 71
2785 White Oak Circle V 3 s,
Orono, MN 55356 # 10� 1 ��
Location: City of Orono, Sec 4BD, east of Crystal Bay
Road ar north of Fox Street
Purpose: Wetlano altel'ation to control water and prevent
overloading of drainfeld and flooding
Dear Mr. Dougan:
At the regularly scheduled August 21, 1986 meeting of the Board of Managers,
the subject permit application was reviewed. Action was taken allowing
District staff to issue your permit only after receipt and staff approval of
the following:
1. Information regardinq the s17P of the in -coming culvert and a plan showing
the outlet pipe to be the same size of the inlet pipe.
2. Documentation that the applicant has received a conditional use permit
from the City of Orono.
Please be advised that the project is not authorized until the above has been
t>ubmitted and you have been notified of permit issuance. Should you have any
questions regarding this matter plea,e contact me at 473-4224.
Very truly yours,
EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES
Engineers for the District
Julje Johnson
kh
cc: Board
G. Macomber
Chris Hughes, Coffin and
Gronberg
J. Mabusth, City of Orono
PAINNFHAFIA CREEK
WATE9SHE10 0I0"TRI6?'
P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391
BOARD V MANAGERS. David H Cochran, Pres - Albert L Lehman - John E Thomas
Camule D Andre - James R Spensley - Pochard R fiddler • Michael P Carroll
r _ MINN,*
U[,1 2 1966
LAKE MINNEfnNKA
Permit Application No: 86-137 Date: October 13, 1986
Owner: John Dougan
2785 White Oak Circle
Orono, MN 55356
'_ovation: City of Orono, Sec 4BO, east of Crysta', Bay
Road and north of Fox Street
Purpose: Wetland alteration to control water and prevent
overloading of drainfeld and flooding
Dear Mr- Dougan:
Receipt is acknowledged for the following which you have submitted as part of
the above permit application:
1. Revised plan showing a drainage swale rather than a storm sewer pipe,
received October 7, 1986 prepared by Coffin and Gronberg-
2. Conditional use permit from the city.
This plan is in accordance with th- action taken by the Board of Managers on
August 21, 1986 in reference to tie above permit.
This letter is your permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District- Permit
approval is based upon the following exhibits:
1. P(,rmit application. 86-137 received August 11, 1986.
2. Site map of the area.
3. Site plan prepared by Christopher Hughes, P.E. of Coffin and Gronberg,
received August 13, 1986.
4. '_etter from the District to the applicant dated August 28, 1986 informing
them of the permit status.
5. Revised plan showing a drainage swale rather than a storm sewer pipe,
received October 7, 1986 prepared by Coffin and Gronberg.
6. Conditional use permit from the city.
The Board approved the permit application with the condition that the owner has
the responsibility to operate and maintain the approved stormwater management
facilities which were designed in accordance with Rule B of the Watershed Rule,.
Permit Application No: 86-137
(continued)
This permit is valid for one year. If constriction is not complete within ore
(1) year, an extension must be requested. Please contact the District at
473-4224 when the project is about to commence so an inspector may view the work
in progress.
EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES
Engineer^s or the Dist ct
i
2
�" LGiG
Michael -A. anzer,
Date of Is s4e
kh
cc: Board
G. Macomber
C. Hughes, Coffin and
Gronberg
J. Mabusth, City of Orono
K
(City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 2083
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.U3, SUBDIVISION 19
FILE #1082
WHEREAS, John F. Dougan (hereinafter "the applicant") is the
owner of the property located at 2785 white Oak Circle within the City
of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows:
Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 144/, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, (hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for
a Conditional Use Permit to permit grading and excavation of a
retention pond and swale for f lood control purposes, per Municipal
Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This; application was reviewed as Zoning File #1082.
2. The property is located in the RR-1B Single Family Rural
Residential Zoning District.
3. On October 20, 1986, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed
the application as proposed and recommended approval, finding
that:
A) The applicant's property suffers flooding on an
occasional basis. The property is relatively low within the
watershed and the property is nearly level from west to
east, hence drainage from the steeper watershed upstream
slows down and accumulates on noplicant's property.
B) T!,e drainagewRy through applicant's property is not a
designated wetland.
C) The applicant's drainfield is within the area that is
occasionally flooded and is affected adversely during such
periods.
Page 1 of 4
City of ORONO
.� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 2083
of
. `
;0)) The combination of pond excavation and associated fill
to direct the drainage away from applicant's drainfield may
have some beneficial effect on the drainfieid but might not
solve the back yard flooding problem without a more
comprehensive project inr!::jing neighboring properties
downstream. The applicant has acknowledged that this
project may not solve the entire flooding problem.
E) The applicant has obtained the required permit from the
Minnehaha Creek Watersht-d District.
4. Work done by private property owners which was tacitly
allowed by thy-_ City, ;which resulted in channelization of portions
of the upstream watershed, may be contributing to some degree to
the rate of run-off reaching applicant's property.
S. The proposed grading and excavation will have no anticipated
effect on the watershed upstream of the property, and is expected
to have no significant effect on nutrient retention or rates or
amounts of run-off downstream from the property.
6. The City Council has considered this application including
the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission,
reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the effect of
the proposed use on the health, safety and welfare of the
community.
7. The City Council finds that granting a Conditional Use Permit
to allow the grading and excavation of a retention pond and Swale
will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare
of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a
fire hazard cr other danger to iieighbor.ing properties, nor will
it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed
level of use of the property will be in keeping with the invent
and objectives of the 7oninq Code and Comprehensive filar of :he
City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Posed
upon one or more of
the above findings, the Crono City
Council hereby
grants
a Conditional
Use Permit per municipal 70ninq
Code Section
10.C3,
Sut,division
19 to permit the grading and
excavation of a retent
pond and
rswa le for flood control purposes,
subject to the
followi
nditions:
1. Applicant *hall execute a Developers Agremwn• and provide
acceptable security for the project prior to commencement of
work.
Page 2 of 4
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CC' ^,I
NO. 20P3
� r4Jty�
2. Applicant shall grant Drainage Easement and Flowage &
Conservation Easements over the pond and swaie, legal description
to be provided by the City Engineers.
3. Suitable erosion control measures shall be provided as
required by the City Inspector.
4. The disturbed areas shall be re .%getated as soon as feasible
following completion of the grading work.
5. Applicant's contractor shall obtain a grading permit prior to
commencement of the work.
6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and
conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the
zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted
herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
7. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby
agrees to the terms of this resolution and cn behalf of himself,
his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording
of this resolution in the chain of title of the property.
f
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 24th day of
Nov ber, 1966.
ATT ST:
a3aY l�iF]
party Owner
kjk% �_) tn
n, City Clerk Mary C. $ut er, Mayor
P ;ir 3 of 4
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Rom,
NO. 2083
9" i ( t
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY C:' HENNEPIN )
On this 14th day of January . 1987
before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally
appeared John F. & E.Lynn Dougan, husband/wife known to me to be
the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as
his (their) free act and deed.
- �-1 L. NAAS
�� I{�A 1NNNESOTA
MtNNt►IN COUNTY
to demodulm a was
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
NOtAVY PUBLIC
9/8/92
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
On this day of , 198, before me
a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared
known to me to be the
person (s described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,
and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his
(their) free act and deed.
NOTARY PUBLIC
MY COMMISSION FXPIRES
rage 4 of 4
Cj.)UCiL MEETING
rZa - 81988
To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley & (ra du m"ers
City Administrator Bernhardson
From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
Date: January 11, 1988
Subject: #1238 Wayzata Country Club, 200 Wayzata Boulevard
Condition Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing
Pertinent Ordinances:
Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (C) - Conditional use permit for golf
course/country club - all accessory structures must be 50' from all
lot lines.
Required = 50'
Proposed = 55' from Luce Line,
140' from adjacent residential lot line
Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C) - No accessory structure shall exceed
1,000 s.f. of floor area.
Allowed = 1,000 s.f.
Proposed = 2,704 s.f. (40'x67'6")
Variance = 1,704 s.f. or 170%
Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (B) - No accessory building shall exceed
height of the principal building.
Allowed = 30'
Proposed = 14'
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A - Application
Exhibit B - Plat Map
Exhibit C - Property Owners List
Exhibit D - Spec Sheet
Exhibit E - Floor Plan
Exhibit F - Photo of Similar. Structures
Exhibit G - Survey
Review of Application -
The country club proposes the installation of a "metal pole barn"
structure along the west side of their property adjacent to the Wakefield
Farms ne.ghborhood. Per the attached spec sheet, the structure will be
dark brown and 14' in height. The pole barn will be used as additional
storage for maintenance equipment and greens keeping equipment. A concrete
slab foundation will also be installed. Access to the structure will be
via an existing access road over the Luce Line located near an existing
maintenance building and garage on the south side of the Luce Line (see
survey, Exhibit G). The building will be located near the site used for
burning shrubs and trees for those who hike the trail and are familar with
the area. We have received no calls from the surrounding property owners
regarding this land use application.
Zoning File #1238
January 11, 1988
Page 2 of 3
Staff has no other concerns regarding the proposal except to note that
although we are in the process of considering a zoning amendment involving
accessory structures, the impact of the structure at the 14' height and in
consideration of the total area of the country club property, staff sees no
problem with recommending approval of the variance and conditional use
permit as proposed.
Additional Comments and Planning Comnission Recommendation -
February 4, 1988
Additional Exhibits
Exhibit H - Landscape Plan
The representative of the Country Club advised that they have been in
contact with the most affected neighboring property owner on Wakefield
Road. The applicant discussed the extension cf an "existing" berm that
would be Extended to the north providing natural screening from ;:urn site
and new accessory structure. Staff advised that: they knew nothing of the
referci,ced berm (rev-�ew Exhibit H). The landscape plan does not reveal a
berm within the subject area. Staff has inspected the site since the
Planning Commission meeting and has ta. 2n photo= of the alleged berm. As
Tom Jacobs had advised the Planning Commissior, the so-called berm is a
former burn site/pile that has been covered with a light cover of soil
allowing minimal vegetation to be restored. The former burn s:_te runs
approximately 30-40 feet in length at an average height of 10-12 feet. It
is located just to the west of the current burn site serving tO screen the
piles of debris from the Wakefield Road residences.
The representative of the club advised that they will not do any
landscaping until appropriate approvals or permits are obtained from the
City. Staff advised the applicant that the excavation or borrowing of fill
in excess of 100 cubic yards would zequire a conditional use permit and
dependinq o^ the location of an approved berm on the property, could be
instal led 3 34 or 6 foot height.
The king berm referred to at the meeting i5 not an approved berm.
If this bei was approved, either by a general Fermit or a conditional use
permit, it would not meet the clean fill. standards. Even prior to our
recent amendment, the City would never have approved the filling over a
burn site filled with the debris of partially '.)urned plantings and trees.
If the Country Club wishes the berm of 10-12 feet in height, running 30-40
feet in length, a conditional use permit is required. Clearly the land
alteration would exceed the 100 cubic yard standard. The City would also
require the removal of the remnants of the burning pile prior to the land
alteration.
Zoning File #1238
February 4, 1988
Page 3 of 3
Planning Commission Recommendation -
To approve the conditional use permit for the proposed accessory
structure finding all standards of Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (C) for
golf course/country club use have been satisfied and recommends grantinc a
building area variance for the accessory structure of 1,704 s.f. or 170%
based on the following findings:
1. The accessory structure is located 140+ feet from all residential
lot lines.
2. The structure is only 14 feet in height.
3. The structure is located on 144 contiguous acres of land.
4. The natural topography and surrounding vegetation will provide
screening for most of the year.
Applicant is further advised that the alleged berm to the immediate
west of the current burn site is not approved by the City and that if the
Club wishes to install such a berm it will require a separate conditional
use permit review.
The enclosed resolution, has been drafted for Council's review and
action based on the Planning Commission recommendation.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TO MUNICIPAr. ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 3 (C)
AND A VARIANCE. TO
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODC
SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 9 (C)
FILE #1238
WHEREAS, John A. Downey, an authorized representative of the
Wayzata Country Club, (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the
property located at 200 West Wayzata Boulevard within the City of Orono
(hereinafter "City"' and legally described in Exhibit A attached to this
resolution (hereinafter "property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono
for a conditional use permit per Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (C) to allow
the construction of an accessory structure to serve as a storage facility
for the Country Clut and grants a building area variance per Section 1.0.03,
Subdivision 9 (C) of 1,704 s f. or 170% for the accessory structure/storage
Fhed that will exceed the allowed building area of 1,000 s.f.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1238.
2. The property is located in the RR -IC Single Family Rural
Residential Zoning District.
3. The property is approximately 140+ acres in area.
4. The Orono Flanning Commission reviewed this application on January
27, 1988, and recommended approval of a conditional use permit per
Section 10.20; Subdivision 3 (C) for an accessory structure and
recommended approval of a building area variance per Section 10.03,
Subdivision 9 (C) based on the following findings:
A) The proposed structure will be located 140+' from all
residential lot lines. The code requires only a 50' setback from
adjacent residential lot lines.
B) The structure is proposed at a maximum height of 14'. The
current code would allow a maximum height of 30'.
Page 1 of 4
C) The structure will be installed on a parcel of land
consisting of 140+ acres of contiguous lands.
D) The structure will be partially screened by the existing
topography and adjacent trees providing natural screening the
majority of the year.
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this pro-
perty are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property
in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not
adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard
or other danger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a
convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demo,l-
strable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial
property right of the applicant; ar,] would be in keeping with the
spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the
City.
6. The City Council finds that granting a conditional LSE permit to
allow the installation of an accessory structure will not be
detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public,
would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other
danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate Eurrounding
property values and that the proposed level of use of the property
will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the zoning Code
and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City
Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code
Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (C) to allow the construction of an accessory
structure to serve as a storage facility for the Country Club and grants a
building area variance of 1,704 s.f. or 170% for the storage structure that
will exceed the allowed building area of 1,000 s.f., subject to the
following conditions:
1. At the time of appl,carion for a building permit for the accessory
structure, the applicant must submit an accurate survey locating the
proposed structure and designate the size of the structure. The
existing temporary sheds adjacent to the proposed structure on the
north side of the Luce Line are to be removed upon completion of the
storage facility.
2. Applicant is further advised that the filling of the former burn
site to the immediate west of the currently used burn site is not an
approved land alteration by the City and that if applicant chooses to
install a berm of similar height and size, that the City will require
a separate conditional use permit. The debris from the former burn
site must be removed by May 15, 1988.
Page 2 of 4
3. Authorities granted by this resolutior run with the property not
with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by
application for a building permit within one year of the date of
Council approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will
expire on that date (February 8, 1989).
4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and condi-
tions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning
code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and
shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
5. TI,,.� a,.Iersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees
to the cros of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs,
succes:;�rs and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this
resolution in the chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Oreno City Council on this 8th day of February,
1)88.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor
Representative of the Wayzata Country Club
I'aq<, 3 of 4
EXHIBIT A
Resolution No.
t hefsby certify that this ,e a true •rid correct repreaentat - nr - ryrrey of the botua04rl-.l
Per la All of MG following deli ratted Trectal
T r.c( 13 The south 52 test of Lot 9, DIx6 1, Alto -Pair Terrace, according to the plot thereof on file or of record in tt.s
-- of 11c9 of the -.g utrar of Title& In •hJ for said County.
Tract 2, That part of the Cast lit of tLe Southeast 1/4 of Section 36. Township III florth, Range 11 vest lying South of the
-- Chicago and north ilestern Railway Coepeny Itor*er1Y the Man.•Of. ueel.rn Pastrey COOpan)) saghl-of-ray and vast
of • lane drawn parallel to and S00 loot w t of the 0 lino of uid fast 1/7 of the South as 1/4.
Tract 1, All or Lot• 59 and Go and that part of Ina 66 lying easterly of the easterly line Of the Wsl 1/2 of the Porthw-.l
t/6 of Section 1. Torn snip 117. P•ngm 71 and that portion of the •bandonnJ road formerly known •• County Po -I ib.
77 .oleo air per at
Lot• 59 end 61, Auditcr'o .r ubdlvfalOn NurJaer l6. iron Lots 60 end 66. •old Auditor's ' bdlV-
ion nu•abor U. lying bet.aen the southerly oIt at on Of the east line of Wt 59, uId Atd,tor'. SuLdavulan mueJvr
isa and the ueterly I,no of the Twn road •s nw laid out and trawled. which Ilea is 1J lest north ••'.r 1y Iru-
aired at right anglool to Cho to law any descrlled Line, Coamrncinq at the ....th...I corner of the Suuthweat pouter
of Seet,on 16. TtvnoM V I a uof th, p•riga 71 tell thane north •IonV the east line of as td aouthr..t quarter 1e0.4
f est to the •owl Want
of U•lann,ny o! the lens to L• Joscn Ud; thence doflact,ng right In • ■OutMu urly d,r-
rctaun of •n ..ogle 157 dsgrv'f SS Immutoe to Trunt I1,gN•Y m I2 •nJ th•ra tereln• l ng, ell an A,ad,tor. Sub-
Jiviuon mwtivr lA6 1:rnnvyln County ru nnasot•, accord, ny to the D1at thereof on 111. Or of record an lM office of
the Rogiotor ul dead• In end for said County.
Yeast t, Lot 65, Auditor'• SuLdivfo-h Nurl,er lee, Il.nnayan County n,nnosota. •ccordlnq to the plat thereof on file or of
record an too of face ul the Mg a tar of O.aJ. an and for said County.
Treat SI lot •1. Auditor'• SuLd,v upon f:uftLer 164. uenrrp,n County Hine. eta eacept that part of the south 175 feet thereof
If, ng ea at of the root 51 teat and I anq .eat of too Batt Is0 teat of uid lot end eece pt the ►0uth 150 lest of the
east 290 feel thereof, according to the pret thereof an (,I. Or of record to the office of the Register of Deed, an
and fast ..ad County.
lacept that part which tau .,than • distance of I40 feet on each side of the following described line,
r,om a to int on the north line of Sectaan 6, Tovnmhly 117 bOcth, Ranq• 22 Hest d ul•nt 670.02 out of the north ra at
c.+r ear thereof, run aaut M•u er :y •t •n angle o! I6 degree 11 etnutra 12 second• rash tail north .PC " IIn' for
115.92 fc•et.to the POf nt of he4am ,ny of the line to La daser,Lmd: thonce run northwaterly on the last •bove des-
cribed coif for 10.9) feet: th•nc. G.flrct to Me left tan • 1 dcgrces 00 ninut0 curve Ida.'a any lr 67 1041- 12
O,nutem 25 wcund21 for 2079.12 feet: tGe nco on tangent to ••iA cure for 661.11 tuts threes dal lest to the I.
tan • 7 do,,rrrs 00 nlnuts cur.• IGa lt• anq to J6 dry was• 11 m,nute• to 'seed a for ITJe.JI feet: tnenci deflect t0
the n qnt on • 2 dogrel .9 m,nut. 16.59 aveond curve Idrlea aegis J7 degree• JO Olnute aJ (or 1179.19 Ire l eMne.
�n tangent to a ad curve for 50.2 feet, 1.,e nca Juflect to the right on • . degro. JO atnure curve fdelt• sepia It
de4,vs. S7 elnute.) for s65.56 feel thanco on tanyrnt to a iA Curve for US.OS Irst end that& teraa nano t,nq.
Alai. - Cpt that part of Tract 4 deecrtUJ •Love •dlotnlnq end anuthsrlJ •rd.wstab rly of the lost •Love descr,rd
att•:D:
Al,,, oscept that part of Tract 1 de.crat.ed •hove IYin9 north •stu dy of a fans run pore llrl rtth end distant 140
feet nor) I. sitar ly of the lire •hove leaf bed line roach tics rater ly of Lino A JeaCrlUd Lulorr
Line A; rr.6t • point on the first •Love desortUd line distant 15t.52 teas southeasterly of its point of t.refn.taon run
frorthe-.terly •t •n angle of s2 do ,rue 17 ",east.• 59 second• with aid
Its. Irhen mro•ored true north wa•ot t.
nor t h. ell lot 2 N .76 Icat; thence deflect co the right •t •n •nuts of 12 dsq woo• 21 mt nut-. of ..Conde for 101.5
tt•et to tho pas nt of Leginniny Of LIn& A to be desc(tbad, an
deflect to the right at on
angle of 90 de4reo. end
run wet Mrly Io •n ant.... ctaon r rtn the motherly bound.ry of TrunR Ill yhray ■o. 12 •. now lOreted •v0 tr.v.led,
t nef.00 run a,uthwe*to"*' to • point dlst•nt I" Ica northu •tar ly (resured at fight •ogle• of • point on eM
first •bove do.craLed lane dlatont 26s.09 left southasatbrly of Ita point of torsan.t,on, thence run muthe•sterly
parallel with a. id tan. for 950 feet (when rreeared along Paid Itnel: the
run southeasterly to a point d,.tant
140 rest not theasee(ly -...red et right Engles) of • lc ant on lead lane distant 1110.41 foal Southeasterly of its
point of tore-•t,on and there tawniest ny;
also eacept that part of Tracts . end 5 descr,tad •love lying northerly of a lane run para{tel with end J u :ant N 0
(cat nurit- ly oI the first •Love dose cl: ad tan. vt, ch I,es sortherly •nit r•aterl, of Lane D ale scribed Mtw
Lam 01 De4inninV •t a point on Lane C dascratxd te{Ov dlstent 200 rvet •outtu•a ■t erly of it
Want tat ternanat ton: thanco run
a outhre't erly at right anq la. with se ad Lan. C for 50 loci thence run southeasterly to a point distant 60 feet
southve't.rly Ine•sured •t rayht angles) of • point on so aJ Lin• C d,.t•nt 160 fees •outhoest.,,y of at
po,n[ of
tormanstagn, thence run mouthwm[oriy co a point d,otant Ig0 feet no rtnwaterly,l sr•'ur*d •t r,ght •nV reel of • point
On inn It
nt •bove described line distant 1199.SS foot .o utnwstaslY of ale puant of Mginn anVl thence run aouth-
.nsterly to • po,nt Ja•tant iso feet northwesterly I,no asu(td •t r-14nt .nglasl of • point on mud I,% d un.-1 1129.110
feet wuthrvster ly of ate pant of It•garn,nqf ttmncr run sO uthw•torlf to • point distant 160 fewt nortnreacerly
(-...red at r:9ht engle•1 01 • {cant an u,0 lino distant 17.9.56 feet southwesterly of its point of bayann,nq;
thence run woo to rly parallel with uid tan. fur 1.I. f..t when raaurW •)anq said line,: thanco run northwesterly
to a point data nt 110 test nortnusterly Irrasu,cd •t rtglat •ogles) of a Point on said line distant 5199.50 root
r.cuthresterly 01 Its point of Loylnnlnq ar.d these acre, n.tin q.
Ltne C, P.ginn)nq at a point on eh• f, C't abvvc doacrtLeJ tans Jastant N0..61 fret wuthrr•to"Y of It■ Point of baVtnnlnyl
thonce run nowtrroetasly •t .n angle 0f 15 digress 50 OInuea. 06 ascends rash uid l na lrfa7, Ise soured free aouth-
-at to nortnan•.tI rot 11I0.35 feet and tier• Lcreanatany:
•Ise eacept that pact of Tr•tt 5 descrlhed •t.- lying Southv•starly of • Ithe run par• U of with end ,l a tans 1.0
fret 'out nr•r t. ray or the first aLoca d.srr,baA tan. which Ilse nor U,we.tcrly of • Ian. run pera11.1 with end
Jlst.nt 120 feet youth..•tarty of L,no 0 dascratod LvIw :
Line Ir0n a paD ant on tn. first •Dove ducraUd Itne distant I1C0 tut -I ma ly of ate is tot of began",,'. run'oul hvastalay
•t ragnt •nglco with seal tine fur :1 Seet tr tt.. yetnt rf teq,nnan. of Lanu D to 1,a deseraDaJa thanco leftist to the
r a,,nt •t •n angle of ..0 Jegra.• for 145 1 nt: thonce deflect to If.
Isft tan • 1 Jeyrea 00 wan.,. curve ,delta •ngl'
S Jr4rcen IS wine rat 12 •ev-daal f..r './2 feel •rxf thew• tecat.-t,n9;
Alen escapt feet pr rt of Tract S da.rr"-6 •five •d)ointnq and southwesterly of the last •Love drocrabed strip which
law• nowt hruter ly of tJ,• lolSOrany dr'cr,UJ l,no,
IT"""
o71nn," at a point on the we't lanv grOlnc• 7, eaglet• h,ynl•nJa Jirtant lS5 feel noftn Of tns eoutn7
c'Jr not tnora•gt, Chon.'• run .o uthweaterty to • to ant d,at.nt 120 list •oulM..taf ly less e•,(ed at fly hl •nV real +(
i,n int on Llne D d.acrlteJ at- d,.t.nt :C9 feet .uuth-ti,rly of al• polnl of t-llnnl M, •M In.ra tarainatlnV+
ei n., e.artl Inat pert Ot Traci• 1. 1, end 1 da•rralrJ •1 av, ,an, n„rrlr ttrrly u, a Irne run P.•r•Ilal rath
snit dt't•nt ,hu Ivrt •tart�,ro.r a•rlr ul I,.e fare) slew vas Jrtcr tl aJ lane ..pan tar• auulhrrly of Irne r da•cr,LaJ belw•
EXHIBIT A
Resolution No.
Line r1 0eq inning at a point on Line C described ALAI— distant 100 feet southeasterly of Its point of termination, thence
run herthrastarly at right angles with said Line C for 50 feet, thence Southeasterly to a point distant 80 foot
nor lhsae *,,y Ise uurcd at right angle•! of • yolnt on said Line C distant 700 Cott southeasterly of its point of
lurm,net,0n; tMnre run sast*rly to • point d utant 10{ feet norefe+asterlY Imrsaur*d at nigh[ anylsa) of • yoint
un the first shown dose n eed Ilea dlot•nt 21,. feet wet only of Its point of I"'
" 'nn,nq, lbanct run nor tMu10 ly
perall*) rich said It for 1500 feel end there C•rminating, Sub Pert to a Ilu,tsl,on 0f the right of access from
pert of the dsacrib*d preen usa to TruNi IU ghway tee. 12 ea me if
Dy eM 6uN to deed Doe. Woo 107e 11e, Ills■
of toy eettar of Tlt lee 15s* that)
Together with the right of building, rintaining and having access to a livestock )one a• shown in Deed Doc. go.
102{16e. Ales 0t saq-atrar of t,tlsa.
Subt*et to a right to we part of above land for highWy purpose• such right •hall cease on Deeamb•r 1, 1976 as
shown in Deed Doc. Wo. 1026364. Piles o! Raq Utr♦r of tIt lee. Also
e•c*pc that part of Tr•rt 5 d..c,,. stars lying toutlte sterly of a line run parallel with and distant 120 feet
souther at rly of said Line 0. -
Par 2, lot 6),
that • •lriV of land 66 het eel de .Cro% Io, 6e, sud,tor'• 9uDdlvlaien III! 1P9, the center lira* of which I•
dsac rated ♦a lollorea foraen:tng at the Southeast corner of the 60uthW st I/e of Sa. t.on ){ TwnOhfP it.
Pang.
J1,
thence Durlh •long th* Last lane of a ,d bouthW st Ouart*r. ]U.6 left !c el+e actual point of hegtnn,nq of the 11"
to lv descrit.d thence Aefl*ctInq to the right in ♦ Sout Masterly direction at an alyle of 157 deyreo SS minutes
to State NlVhway r:o. 12 and that* terminating is sublect .o An easement for Pub le toad a the *emo is raw laid out
and opar.ed,
all In Audit ear's Subdiviawn Number Joe, 11%hop,n County, .1-0s.t• according to Ut* plat thereof un /tie or of
record ,n the offices of the Pegist*r of Deeds in and t0[ salt County
Par 1: The Welt 112 of the Southeast 1/e of Sect men 16, twnahtp lls. Pange I1 sub)*ct to Dub1_,a as Amen t ,n that part
included in nayhwy end sill l*ct to sagctto for ,Ight-ot•ray o[ the Electric Short Lin* Railway Conyany at raw,
located and constructed acrosa said tract of land. .
nor e, Th•t part 01 tn* Sou tr...*t 1/e of the Southwest 1/e Section 16. Township 116, Palo 2) ly.ny •outhw*star
ly oC the
County Rood. •ub)ect to sae* ant f0t rlyht-of-ray Of the rI0Ctf IC Snort Line Pa,lway Company a■ nw lou tad aryl
constructed •trues and tract of land.
Subject also to the r,yht and cote ne nt raw salat lnq Of llOrthW •tetra T.1aphone rechanq* C[ripely. • corporation to
m intu n end -,ale its telaph0ne toll wires end eppur tenanco sa raw one rutted end operated uver any part of
said 1•r. de esc opt let Sq. per. 1 ► Tract 2. also
A11 Of the Wert )/2 of t M SOu U.sast 1/e of Section 16. Township I U. ►•n .• 2) ly tray nurth Of the noel Mrly boundary
line of the ri.:•.t-ol-rey of ins [leeer is bhore Llna P•ilway 1—psny ♦, raw Ic•fed and conser_cteA across s•Id tract
Ot land ,s sub lect to certain cow newt■ end ♦q re enanl, es shwa in deed Due. 11. .11,11 r,1*s 01 Pegfstrar of Ttt lee
which run until April 1, l96{. lL•Am Ineti lea to par 11 /law
P•r 5. tot 6, sloes I. Allo-Pao Terrace, •ecosd,nq to the plat thereof on Pile or of recant in eM office of the teeistr•r
-�—� of Tatlrs in and for rest County.
Subject to utility and drainage sesoment an shown on the plat. Is. to lot 6. Block 1. All0-Rat Terrace) Also
trace vll: That part of the tjutheast Quartst of the Scuthwaat Quarter of Section 16. Township Jig. fangs 2l, dt sc n God
•s fo:lors• Cosaenc,nq at the uo rthesat corner of uid Southeast Mast Gusitor of LOutnW at Quarter, thence South
•long the f.a •t line of said Southeast Quarter a distance of 261.21 feat to a point, uid potnt.Lein9 the point
of bcyln-. tnq 0! the property I tnq descrtbed, thence deflecting rlghl 19 dagr**•, e0 minutes to the canter line
of the South minna•yobs ♦nd w•hrtown bad, s{o called the wsyuta-Long it bad, thence southeasterly along
saW reed to the Last Line of uid Lout Mast C.
rt0r of the So u,,W.t Quarter: thence North to the point of
Gegannlrlq.
creel VI11: Tar re sterly 910 feet of the South One-half of the Southeast Lhisrter of fir Northeast Quarter of Section 16.
------ Twnanlp Its, Pange 71.
tract IR: ALSn' Chet pert of Government Lot 2 Section J6, Township ill, sang* 7J, teat ntwrd ss follws: Ueganr.,ng At the
-"—'— 5guthesot corner Of uid Govrrrieent tot 1: lM rice North alol9 the /tot iihe o[ aid
Cover ru+ent Lot 2, • duun^•
of .3 feet; tLsnca rosterly per•Ilel with the Southerly lira• of said Goeor—" Lot 7, a distance of e50 feet,
thence Southwesterly to • point on the South line of aA,d Corernrrht .1 2 distant $50 fet•t tf*st of tta point
of DeV, nninq: thence Get along said South line to the point of L*g,nninq.
Tract R, ALSO, tn•t hwrt cl Vwernre rat Lot 2, Section )6, r—,I,p l U, P•n,. 21. described as follows. DoginrinI at the
SoutLren career of and t:0 vereront Got 2: thence ::earth •long the West lint of said C.vclr ell l,r, 2. • Mt♦ner
of ISO feet: thence Gsterly pa relief with tie Lout Mtly Ilhe of aid
f vcrcrent Lot 2, a dial ante of )So [eat:
thence Sout he•sterly to • point on the South line of said Government tot 2, distant e00 feet E••t of the point
of t<y,nntnq: thence rest along said South line to the point of beginning.
Tract XI: All tt•t part of the South*ast,Qua rt*r of the ScuthWst Qwrter of Sert men 16. T.wnah,p Ill. Range JJ, d*scrtb*d
as fullws� C—"*C inq at the gorthea •t corner of aa,d touttu st Over ter of the Squthrf et Vuor ter : tnonc* South
along the test line trerouf 203.21 leer; thence SOgth 19 degrees 1. minute, scat a d Monet of 1)a.06 tcet to
I.uant, s&IC po i rot I_ ray tic Wlet Ot q,nn,hq of the Vroler tl' betnq deecrlLcd: thence cent, nu ing SO uth 19 drurres
e0 minute. I:e•I to the center lln* of"ns South rllnneepCll• and Watertown Po•j, elan celled the 1laytef a-l.unq sate
Reej: ttr rice :a •art rave •terlr along said canter lino to its inter uct men with a line drawn throuyn the point of be -
,,inning I. e.i r,hu South 27 degrees .0 ni"Ites Wast,.thence :forth 21 degrees e0 minutes i'•at t0 [n* puInt of beglnning.
ro, 1, Iu[pO sat Ini, description the East lino of the Southwest Quarter of the ruuthweat Quarter of toad Sect,On
16 i• assumed to ba • due North and Scuth line.
CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPL ! TION61t
---------------------------------------------------------------
PROPERTY LOCATION
t 3 ' .. 4':1L9f L•
Site Address W G ti.T W Al -ZAT►4 9LVb
V V1 VL•i . \�t a L V
Property Identification Number ( P. I . ! `. ) -
- "Lr�- -' 7L•1L i U.tak�•e••ilit
Please check one - Property abstract or torrens? �n=f=c:� r,1,,i rr,i r,,..
A V�•1 V.,V 4VV1 11V1 1 A --
(for Conditional Use Applications only)
Please attach legal description to applicatioi _f not included
on required survey.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT Phone (home) Cr I Z- H 4 3- to y 2 d
Name %.4-) A-1 ZATA G 0 V NT(L1j C Lv(3 Phone (work) (all - 41 1- 69 S S
Address o100 WEST WAti'ZATA 84-00 City W A114Tr+ Zip S5 39 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OWNER ( if different than applicant) Phone ( home) to 1 2 - H � 3 - G, tiAO
Name %A)A17_AT1A COuN ?-If CI -VG Phone wCF1(ot-L. 4'13-L955
Address �00 %ok) EST W A'I ZRTA &LVC City W AYZAT4 Zip 5S3 /
Date Property Acquired A pa t G 19 5(0 (month/year)
I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
----------------------------------
FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS } V A (Z 1 A N C, G_ 5 (�
$100.00 a) Residential accessory Use
JJL0 0 $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.)
$150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg
$250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use
$200.00 f) Land Alteration
Grading and filling - designated wetland or
floodplain
Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd, or more
Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75'
of Lakeshore
PRD/PID - see fee schedule
OTHER APPLICATIONS
$150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees)
$250.00 Vacation
$1" .00 Easement Vacation
$ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision
$250.00 Rezoning
$200.00 Appeals
Other - see fee schedule
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
Present Zoning District
Present Use of Property Residential
Other (specify)
-------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
Describe request in detail:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
REQUIRED SUBIKITTJ.LS
1. Completed Application Form.
2. Certified Property Owners Li:3t of owners within 350' (you can obtain
this list from Hennepin Cos: -1-y Department of Finance A-603 Government
Center 348-3271)
3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names
on the above list with no return address.
4. Certificate of survey.
5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land
alterations involve changes in elevation (grades).
6. Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements).
7. Plat Map.
8. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of
any other persons you wish notified of this application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The applicant and Property Owner must sign this applica-ion. Please
remember that your application is not complete if the above information has
not been included.
Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete
Zoning Officials Signature Date
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all inform:-tion required or
requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to ., all fees and/or
unusual expenses incurred in review of this applicati, ;•nd certifies that
the information supplied is true and correct to +: best of his/tier
knowledge.
Applicant's signature ��.1^'Kx'Y Date I2_ Z8,1
OWNERS SIGNATURE �' 'r S ! `�— 1 L - L4 - b )
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further
authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants,
agents, commission i<<embers, <<nd Council members for purposes of
investigation and verific tion of this request.
Owner's signature ��, �_ t, (9�.— Date f L Z- A87
----------------------------------•-----------------------•------------------
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the
Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the
third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled
review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is
unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an
authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & 7,oning
Office of this change prior to the meeting.
as"
pl
of
STAr1oN 9
law
-MtSt4EAPo0S
ry
I to
a
MY or ORONO
IMWAT Vi!!4 Now R.
JA
SQPI
"Y
A----
00
Loc-41
OF
i Syl At-
pl
fox
12 oLvo
It -all R.,
34
SEC 1. T. II' R. 23 43
Property Owners List
Zoning File #935
-::# / . ce
36-118-23 34 0008 36-118-23 31 0013 36-118-23 41 0014
H. Norman Nafstad Donald Wildman Clifford S. Asmhun Jr.
460 Old Long Lake Rd. 280 Wakefield Road 117 Chevy Chase Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391 Wayzata, MN 55391 Wayzata,MN 55391
36-118-23 34 0010
Donald & June Swanson
4408 WEst 58th Street
Minneapolis, MN 55424
36-118-23 34 0015
Jerry Alstead
440 Old Long Lake Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
36-118-23 33 0011
David & Jill Robers
30 Myrtlewood Road
Wayzata , MN 55391
36--118-23 33 0010
Verena L. Pearson
20 Myrtlewood
Wayzata MN 55391
36-118-23 33 0009
James & Mary Matteson
10 Myrtlewood Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
36-118-23 31 0008/7
Dale K. Warner
375 Wakefield Road
Wayzata, MN '5391
36-118-23 31 0010
John T. Thornton
220 Wakefield Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
36-118-23 31 001.1
William Ferril
240 Wakefield Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
36-118-23 31 0014
R. Bruce Earls
320 Wakefield Rd.
Wayzata, MN 55391
36-118-23 31 OO15
C. Wayne & Angie Leneave
360 Wakefield Rd.
Wayzata, MN 55391
i
1 36-11S-23 41 0021
Richard G. WElls
131 Chevy Chase Drive
Wayzata,MN 55391
r
36-118-23 41 0013
Donald & Marion Mcconnon
115 Chevy Chase Dr.
Wayzata, MN 55391
36-118-23 41 O012
Waldo Nelson
113 Chevy Chase Drive
Wayzata,MN 55391
36-118-23 41 0011
Thomas L. Curry
111 Chevy Chase Drive
Wayzata,MN 55391
36-118-23 41 0020 36-118-23 44 0009
Robert & Annette Langford Gerald Androli
129 Chevy Chas Road 100 Ferndale Green
Wayzata, MN 55391 Wayzata, rat 55391
36-118-23 41 0019
Jeffrey Jacobsen
127 Chevy Chase Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
36-118-23 41 0018
Imogene: M. Rogers
125 Chevy Chase Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
36-118-23 44 0010
Charles Hulse
95 Ferndale Green
Wayzata,MN 55391
36-118-23 44 0011
John & Roxanne Powers
85 Ferndale Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
36-118-23 41 0017 36-118-23 44 0014
Bradford & Janie Blankenship William Mueller
123 Chevy Chase Drive So. 55 Ferndale Green
Wayzata,MN 55391 Wayzata, MN 55391
36-118-23 41 0016
Herbert Abramson
121 Chevy Chase Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
36-118-23 14 0011
Leopold Hauser III
475 North Ferndale Road
j Wayzata,MN 55391
36-118-23 31 0012 36-118-23 41 0015 36-118-23 14 0008
Paul Baszuki Jeffrey Wujek Ed & Marlys Cohen
250 Wakefield Road 119 Chevy Chase Drive 519 North Ferndale Rd
Wayzata, MN 55391 Wayzata, MN 55391 Way ata,MN 55391
36-118-23 13 0006
Timothy M. O'Connor
505 North Ferndale
Wayzata,MN 55391
35-118-23 13 0007
Klaus P. Becker
507 North Ferndale Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
36-118-23 13 0008
Yvonne C. Cooke
509 No. Ferndale Road
Wayzata,MN 55391
Property Owners List Cont.
Zoning, File #935
36-118-23 13 0009
Edward L.'Delanhanty
511 No. Ferndale Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
36-118-23 24 0004
Bruce B. Dayton
990 Old Long Lake Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
36-118-23 24 0007
Robert Benson Jr.
430 Wakefield Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
36-118-23 14 0007
H. Glendon Johnson
517 No. Ferndale Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
36-118-23 14 0006
Andrew & Mary Smith
515 No. Ferndale Road
Wayzata,MN 55391
36-118-23 13 0001
Anne B. McCourt
508 North McCac}den Place,
Los Angeles, CA 90004
PROPOSAL
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
ffampA
Structural Buildings
Down Pavrn.nt s
Chaops OAe1 r
Change O der ► _
Division of Meta Wood, Inc.
Delivery .
FROPOSAL ...
5249
RRa3 St Clcud, MN 56301
..
Completion s
-
Rhone (612) 252 3350
�-
DATE-!
n.,..n., .,n•m, ,. .,,w io a c,>^r.. era
Total Proposal a
Poi`s Name
/oK�yrRy
Job Locaton - Note Be Preesa rW,4Va.4r
CLac
—
—
purchaser's Address
moo w--
City
/
stfl(elirl,
Zip Code
,
HoorePhidne
Job Phone
Office Phone
-- ----
-
This proposal is based on the aloreramicoad dimensions as the base balding, and speabcstons and
/
estimates as flat forth below." is wnttM subject to sbrka5. av alaWltY 01 palace H. act-rdents. weather
—
Width Lehph F4bBM
IGALVI Icov IFCI
*no other forces and delays beyond Contractors control IT 15 WRITTEN SUBJECT TOTHEAPPROVALOF
THE HOME OFFICE OF THE ABOVE CONTRACTOR and shell not he tmd-ng until home office approval has
teen g,ven. This propose) shall have ben deemed as having been accosted by home office of customer
has not received a written reflection notice within 10 da, s of proposal date. If rejected by home office.
S. D ye Ce
$"Co on TYPE
owners "'impairment will De refunded /
ZONE - 5- POLE SPACING [(- TRUSS LOADING
WRITE IT DOWN - VERBAL AGREEMENTS NOT BINDING
'-'HEAVY DUTY TRUSS V INDUSTRIAL ❑ CEILING LOAD
65, u /[ 0 //11 G-
/- A jar Srt-EI WID tB401AIN
ovERNEAD JLOOP-
al/O 5' Ti EC- W /D
BFe"AlIV OvERH61l"D 1lcoie,
:7 E'UE ia'/rYj Y- $R SE
Electrical Power Avaaeble X Yes No
COLORS
Sdes� R Ifa✓L Esys Trip P 15;Ec"
EMe Bottom Trip / 1
Gables Ovetham FACIA ,��'
Roof �osad Oebfe FACIA &44
Ssdiq Dome loud terra FACIA
Comer Trip LIMIT �rJ
Gable Trim Asese-sulpse CL_
Doan Trim iUWse F'
Trac►Cov.r --_-- NOW ICAPI ILITEI
Owners Itespons"ves
I. Owner shall be tesyansible for obIS-rig all buudrng Aral land or
perms. Goiter, shall also be resporsibls for placing the bu,Idmb
so that bu•darg does not encroach upon any easements of any
other tend encumbrances.
2. Owner shaft be responsible for removing all obstructions and
deblis from the site aokrderg but not landed to snow. buildings.
rocks and ties
3 Owner shah be responsible fa site xecistal.on including but not
Muted to leveling the site and grad. setting.
• Owner shall adwse Contractor of al potential above ground had
Of underground hntards and rmdenhfy said hatsrds local,- am
cludu+g but not binned to under and above Around utilities.
drainage tile. arid.CPtic tanks Owf'er shall wdhstatd repair and
moving cost.
5 In the event that underground Conditions known or unknown to
owner, such a. hock or sal cadroons, underground water co
underground caverns cause Contractor any eddtinnsl e.pense
for use of tqu,pment. labor or matanals in erecting this building,
the owner shalt be responsible for sit costs and aspenses lot such
addrhon.l work if owner is unwrMng to Pay five additional ss
pense. all motes paid by owner shall be forfeited and Contractor
shah have no further obligation to complete the bull".
6 Owner is to Provide and terry builders rrak, foe, tornado, wind
ff and oer n........ .n.ur.nce Contractor and Crew are full/
covered by Workmen's Companssocto Insorenca.
Describe levelness of site hen O /_/ 4.) E R_
u/ i l / G Eus`L
Desk" Completion Date _1Q 5- r'1 P t�
Desk"
We hereby propose to furnish labor and materials �%
complete si accordance with the above !7 r T_- ���j4r.� �i.Lt�-L[rGLl�G �'/✓
specHtcetoM and foaowmp estimate: Ibl lid sum of �.f�Y�-r!!L Y 1,t,�.
Psymerna to be m&Vds follow.:
/ O �•.- DownpaylMnt Ito 4lesmanl (
r On Dallvery Ito Driva `- - . Satennert
On Completion Ito Crew) Make all checks payable to above Contractor
If payment is not made as provided for above, a SERVICE CHARGE of the rate of 1 P, % per month 11 B% annual total writ be imposed on the unpaid
principal balance. By Acceptance of this Proposal, the umders,gn.d eg-, Ill all The terms, comdnons, and latelatiohe set forth on this page and as
STATED ON REVERSE SIDE OF THIS DOCUMENT.
Accepted this__ deft of __-, 1• bye___-- --
Customer.
Customer
NOTE: THIS BUILDING IS DESIGNED AND IS APPROVED. FOR AGRICULTURAL USE ONLY IT IS NOT DESIGNED. APPROVED. GUARANTEED. OR
INTENDED TO BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSES EXCEPT WHERE IT IS SPECIFICALLY NOTED IN THIS PORPOSAL AND CONTRACTOR SHALL
NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, WHETHER ARISING UNDER ITS GUARANTEE OR OTHERWISE. WHICH RESULTS FROM OR IS CAUSED BY ANY
MODIFICATIONS OF ALTERNATIONS TO THIS BUILDING
iF THE ABOVE PAYMENT SCHEDULE IS NOT FOLLOWED. CUSTOMER WILL ASSUME ALL LEGAL FEES FOR COLLECTION
Structural Buildings
Division of Meta -Wood, Inc.
RRa3 St. Cloud, MN 56301
Phone 1612) 252 3350
NOTICE TO MINNESOTA OWNER
As required by the Minnesota Improvements Of Real Estate Law, Contractor hereby notifies owner of the follow ng;
1 .) Persons or companies furnishing labor ;r materials for the improvement of real property may enforce a lien upon the
improved land if they are not paid for then contributions, even if such parties have no direct contractual relationship
with the owner.
2.) Minnesota law permits the owner to withheld from his contractor so much of the contract price as may be
necessary to meet the demands of all other lien claimants, pay directly such lions and deduct the cost thereof from the
contract price, or withhold amounts from his contractor until the expiration of 90 days from the completion of such im-
provement unless the contractor furnishes to the owner waivers of claims for mechanic's liens signed by persons who
furnished any labor or material for the improvement and who provide the owner with timely notice
NOTICE TO WISCONSIN OWNER
As required by the Wisconsin Construction Lien Law, Contractor hereby notifies owner that persons or companies
furnishing labor or materials for the construction on owner's land may have lien rights on owner's land and buildings if
not paid. Those entitled to lien rights, in addition to Contractor are those who contract directly with the owner or those
who give the owner notice within 60 days after they first furrnsh labor or materials for the construction, and should
give a copy of 080 notice received to his mortgage lender, if any. Contractor agrees to cooperate with the owner and
his lender, if any, to sea that all potential lien claimants are duly paid.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1 ) This is a purchase and sale of building maienals only
2 ) Seller war,anfs to the original purchaser trial all material supplied to buyer will be of standard quality pursuant to seller-s
specifications and free from defects of material and workmanship under normal use and conditions.
3) THE WARRANTY PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 21S AGREED TO BE EXCLUSIVE, AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHERS THERE
ARE NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES. EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE IM-
PLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND f ITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE MADE BY SELLER, OR
SELLER'S AGENTS OR SERVANTS
4 ) IT IS AGREED THAT SELLER'S LIABILITY, WHETHER BASED ON THE WARRANTY, NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILI.
TY, CONTRACT. OR OTHER THEORY, AND THE REMEDIES OF THE BUYER, SHALL BE LIMITED AS SET FORTH IN
PARAGRAPH 5 BELOW
5) SELLER'S SOLE OBLIGATION IS LIMITED TO REPAIRING OR REPLACING AT SELLER'S OPTION, FREE OF CHARGE,
AND AT SELLER'S PLACE OF BUSINESS, ANY MATERIALS SUPPLIED HEREUNDER THAT PROVE, IN SELLER'SJUDGE-
MENT TO BE DEFECTIVE SELLER SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
WHICH MAY INCLUDE. BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, EXPENSES FOR GASOLINE, TELEPHONE, TRAVEL, LODGING, DEBRIS
CLEAN-UP, LOSS OR DAMAGE TO PERSONAL PROPERTY OR BUILDING CONTENTS, LOSS OF REVENUE OR PRO-
FITS. LOSS OF TIME. USE OR INCONVENIENCE
6 ) Buyer agrees to inspect the building materials at the lime of delivery and nobly seller of any defect. Acceptance of the
materials by the buyer snall be deemed a waive, of any defect in material or workmanship that was discoverable at the time
of delivery and inspection
7 ) Seller has no knowledge of the ntended use of the budding materials. Buyer is solely responsible for construction of any
budding or structure into which the materials are incorporated, and for compliance with any applicable local, state or federal
building codes and regulations
6) Seller will provide erection instructions to buyer Buyer is under no obligation to follow svd instructions, regardless of whether
buyer follows said instructions, seller makes no representation or warranty as to any physical characteristics, including but
not limited to. load factors or uses to which ilia completed building or structure can be put
9 ) Buyer agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, seller, from any claim, demand, action or cause of action by any other party
arising out of the purchase of materials hereunder, and will satisfy any judgment obtained against seller including reimburse-
ment to seller for any costs and expenses including the payment of actual attorney fee, incurred by seller in the defense of
any action
Signature _ ,_ _- — Dote_._ _--
ACCESSORY & COLOR LAYOUT
View
DATE _
NAME_
PHONE
A. Fill In Exact Door Locations
B. Show Grade On Job Site
C. Submit This Form With Each Order
D. Indicate Building Colors
E. Indicate Which View
(North, South, East, West)
�ka- .0..
-_
Show North
fi
View
Building Length
View
View
uraae I
a x i� i� i 6
i
A
fi
Grade
Building
Width
1 �
Grade FLOOR PLAN Grade
so
i
A4
NO
(GEL
NOTES;
I
M.wi{D-
iw\••wa cow.ww Mii.w..s.. wuwnD
\. [aI{w•wWT vT.. w+•Dw.. we ; (....v.
.. MvW uwaa ..w•Cwaa Y iwla. n T
s. f..a •wncfiu Ta. •s ruwweo ev ww
• PwDRa.•O.M� u+D Gu►aA�•.Tr .Oaw �6
• .]ICaaiaw T.. /
•�Y' �� Twa [a.'T MTM.A] WODUT .j Cw.•.
•.or.s..ow.t wo•'�•'aw�l.�•.^
lr• . �� r�l 7'�•
r�
K 96
Z\
I •
C1-v
GEOFFREY S. CORNISH BRIAN M. SILVA
C
GOLF COURSE ARCHITECTS
FIDDLERS GREEN, AMHERSj- MASS.
w[wvc .n•.eN.w
2488.1
UNCIL MEETING
TO: Mayor and City Council FEB - 81988
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator CITY OF ORONo
DATE: February 3, 1988 CITY OR
ON
Official Land Use Applica*ion Deadlines
Attachment A. Official Deadline Memo Dated 1/29/88
ISSUE - Formal adoption of deadlines for submittal -)f land use
applications.
INTRODUCTION - At present the deadlines only require the
application -be submitted 25 days in advance of the Planning
Commission meeting with no other deadlines. The requirement for
complete document submission at the 25 day mark shifts the burden
more to the applicant should a delay be involved. It also allows
for earlier staff review. While there will still probably be
applications occasionally delayed because of needed items
discovered after the application deadline passes, it should be a
substantial improvement over the present setup yet balancing the
issue of applicants who do not want to be unduly delayed by
"bureaucratic rules". The 12 and 8 day deadlines for staff
review generally mean an application tabled at one meeting may
need to be tabled f r a month for any significant information
submission.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Adopt as presented
2. Amend and adopt
3. Table for further consideration
RECOMMENDATION - Adopt as presented.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to approve a
policy that would establish a deadline for the '..ing of land use
applications and for addendum submittals when applications are
tabled during the review process as follows:
Deadline for land use applications (completed
application plus all required information submitted) . .
25 calendar days before the regularly scheduled meeting
of the Planning Commission.
Applications tabled at Planning Commission or Council,
submittals requiring consultants review 12 calendar
days before the meeting date.
Submittals requiring in-house staff review 8
calendar days before the meeting date.
Ayes , Nays __
1
To: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator
From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
Date: January 19, 1988
Subject: official Policy Establishing Deadline Dates for the Review of
Land Use Applications
The Planning Commission approved the proposed policy establishing
deadline dates for the filing of land use applications and applications
tabled during the process of review. The proposed policy motion was not
unanimiously approved. The minority opinion of one felt that the deadline
dates for the submittal of applications should be extended to include an
additional week allowing staff time to review applications so that the
public hearing notice can be published. The member also noted that too
often staff discovers important supportive information lacking after a
public hearing has already been published in the paper.. Staff would concur
that the additional week prior to that publication deadline date would help
but that in most cases, additional information sougl.c arises from the more
in-depth staff review that may occur a week before the Planning Commission
meeting and the public hearing notice already 'olished and application
scheduled on the official agenda.
Staff would ask that we present the proposed policy for Council review
and approval on the Council agenda of February 8, 1988.
To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley & Commission Members
City Administrator Bernhardson
From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
Date: January 11, 1988
Subject: Official Policy Establishing Deadline Dates for the Review of
Land Use ApplicationE
Exhibit A - Proposed Handout - 1988
rn occas;on, staff has witnessed the dilemna of residents/applicants
when faced w the unnecessary delay resulting because of either a mis-
understandin it applications (application plus required submittals) must
be submitted _.. _cotnplete_form by the required legal publication deadline
date (25 days before the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting)
or when applications are tabled during the review process because of the
need for additional imput or information.
The handout information and preliminary meetings with perspective
applicants have greatly helped to reduce the number of misunderstandings
created at the time of filing of land use applications. The real
difficulty results when applications are tabled during the review process.
It is imperative that the applicants realize what real time loss is
involved.
If additional information is sought requiring consultant's review,
then a 12 day deadline before the r .2du led meeting is required. If the
information need only be reviewed by the in-house staff, only an 8 day
deadline is necessary.
Applicants always feel that they can submit the addendum information a
day before the packets go out. The individual notices that are mailed
after each meeting also notify of deadlines of upcoming meetings. The
problem is, staff cannot always respond within days after such meetings
because of the need to prepare for upcoming weekly agendas.
Staff recommend that an official policy statement on land use
application deadlines be ado ted and prepared as a separate handout for
each applicant at the time of either initial contact or the filing of a
land use application. It is staff's opinion that a policy supported by
both Council and Planning Commission by official action will provide the
much needed support for staff when fighting the deadline battle and at the
same time preserve the current level of review for agenda items.
PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by Cohen, seconded by Brown, to approve a policy
that would establish a deadline for the filing of land use applications and
for addendum submittals when applications are tabled during the review
process as follows:
Deadline for land use applications (completed applica`ioz plus all
required information submitted) . . . . 25 days before the regularly
scheduled meeting of. the Planning Commission
Applications tabled at Planning Commission or Council, submittals
requiring consultants review . . . . 12 days before the meeting date
Submittals requiring in-house staff review. . . . 8 days before the
meeting date.
Ayes 5, nays 1. Bellow_ voted nay.
OFFICIAL DEADLINE DATE SCiiEDULE FOR 1988
FOR FILING OF NEW LAND USE APPLICATIONS
OR SUBMITTALS OF ADDENDUM INFORMATION FOR APPLICATIONS
IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEW
Deadline Dates for Filing of Land_Jse_Applications
1pplications must be submitted 25 d.,,s before the Planning Commission
meeting scheduled for the public hcaring or public review of the
application in order to meet the legal requirement of 10 days published and
posted notices prior to the public hearing (vacation applications require
14 days published and posted notices). It is important that all
applications be submitted in complete form (applications and required
submittals referenced in land use application handouts) at the time of
filing because this initiates a formal notification process advising
members of the public that formal plans plus irtive in'Pormation are
available fcr review.
Planning Commission Meeting Deadline Date
J;r.uary 19
December 24
February 16
January 22
larch z1
February 26
April 18
March 25
*May 2
April 8
May 16
April 22
*June 6
May 13
?�:;►p 20
May 27
*.'.!l,y 6
June 10
July 18
June 24
*August.
July 8
ItIk'4ust
July 22
*S�pt amber 7
August 12
Srt--L-nber 19
August 26
October 17
September 23
November 21
October 28
December 19
November 23
* Note - these are optional meetings, scheduled at the discretion of
staff members
Deadline Dates for Addendum Information/Submittals.Requested by Either the
Planning Co--ission.or Council
If your application is tabled because of a request for additional
information that would require consultant and/or staff review the following
deadline schedule shall be observed:
Meeting
January 11
January 25
February 8
February 22
March 14
March 28
April 11
April 25
May 9
May 23
June 13
June 27
July 11
July 25
August 8
August 22
September 12
September 26
October 10
October 24
November 14
November 28
December 12
Meeting
January 19
February 16
March 21
April 18
*May 2
May 16
*June 6
June 20
*July 6
July 25
*August 1
August 15
*September 7
September 19
October 17
November 21
December 12
Council Meeting
Consultant Review
December 31
January 13
January 27
February 9
March 2
March 16
March 30
April 13
April 27
May 11
June 1
June 15
June 29
July 13
July 27
August 10
August 30
September 14
September 28
October 12
November 2
November 16
November 30
Deadline Schedule
Staff Review
January 4
January 15
February 1
February 12
March 7
March 21
April 4
April 18
May 2
May 16
June 6
June 20
July 1
July 18
August 1
August 15
September 2
September 19
October 3
October 17
November 7
November 21
December 5
Planning Commisson Deadline Schedule
Consultant Review
Staff Review
January 6
January 11
February 3
February 8
March 9
March 14
April 6
April 11
April 20
April 25
May 4
May 9
May 24
May 27
June 8
June 13
June 22
June 27
July 13
July 18
July 20
July 25
August 3
August 8
August 24
August 26
September 8
September 12
October 5
October 10
November 9
November 14
November 30
December 5
Note - these are optional meetings, scheduled at the d'scretion of
staff members
C�JUNCIL MEETING
FEB - 819e9
To: Mayor Grabek CITY OF ORONO
Orono Council Members
City Administrator Bernhardson
From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
Date: February 3, 1988
Subject: #1171 Landmark Construction, Inc. - Road Name Request
The applicants have provided three choices for a road name. The first
two were reviewed as presenting potential conflict with existing similar
road names within the City and adjacent cities. The third choice, Landmark
Drive, was selected by the staff as the one presenting the least potential
for confussion. Staff unanimously recommends the road name of "Landmark
Drive" for the Bayside Landing plat road.
The applicants have also asked to install their own street sign and in
addition seek to combine the stop sign and street sign as a single signage,
similar to the signage at the Farm at Long Lake. The Public Works Director
has been advised of the applicants' request and will advise them as to the
City standards for street signs on private roads.
CITY OF ORONO
PRIVATE ROADWAY REQUEST
A. The subject of this request is:
an existing private roadway.
X a RXgRRRRq private roadway which is to be created as a
condition of MORS subdivision ARRRQXRk-
B. The owner(s) of this Private Roadway and/or all abutting property
will be (are) the owner(s) of the following described property:
OliSLG^ p, DAYSIDE LANCING
C. The above owner(s) hereby request that this Private Roadway be
known by the following name:
Choice No. 1 RwysiAF nrivn
Choice No. 2*_payside Lane
Choice No. 3 Landmark Drive
(List three choices in order of preference. The City Council will
approve a name provided no conflict exists with existing names or
naming policy. If all names have a conflict, you will be asked to
make new choices. The approved name will be used for all mailing
address and official identification purposes.)
D. The above owner(s) hereby request the City of Orono to install the
following standard street and traffic signs and said owner(s) hereby
agree to reimburse the CJ.ty for all costs of said installation.
(Such signing may be required as part of a separate Developer's
Agieement and/or subdivision request.)
standard city street name sign(s) - number required
standard "STOP" sign(s) - number required
standard traffic sign(s) described below:
- number required
The above owner(s) do hereby acknowledge the (future) existence of
said private road, and that the City of Orono has no obligation to _
maintain or service said private road, and that the City of Orono
does not intend to acquire or open said private road as a public
roadway.
Si ature(s of owners
7K
Paul D. Swanson, President Date
Landmark Construction, Inc.
Date
Da to
Date
E-� l-9 o+ "r "-
1r.2S
'A.A.
D-1p
1635
..20. IA, 5C It
SC.
....3QSL340-S
........ AO•S
. 38.27
_3Gq
3A-27
3A•11
111-32
20eA
.„.ti_...70SA
1841
_. 19.3D.2
a6+
IC-32
SAAA
„...._._...3636
...._.._.... 1D77
__.__.. 3619
:_..: ie
-.,-__._ ..2CJ3
__.......... 2C•19
.... .. 58.18
SO. to
SA-26 6a,8
.._. ..3C•21
i.sar 3C•57
6A-3
38-27
3C• 19 38-37
]a27 3AJS
t
-38
ID-28
D20
t so-ss
SASS
•
..... ....DAB
........... BA-20
3A46
7D-01
.. 1QSA. 2AJ,SA.21
7G62
IG4A
1C aA
...._......
7P76
AA
A
_.-.....-..».AA.At
9-I 31
671
_....2A•S2
2AJS
30-31
.D•O1..A.h
IG-36
2C-33
.2A. 10.3C•,0
.............2ll.
151 ._.»....« 6.81
_...__..684t
..._»...7A-50
. .. ...._.. I0-56
.-_ _.... IA-21
2C•21
3657
7G8
fills. IC
2830
10. 136
..___. 0C•71
_..2AJ 7
1637
.BJe
3D11
1U0
162E
1-St
IA•28
aD-78
ID•st
1631
2D77
7C-77
ArWA_FP ST MK
1A33
A TwA TFa', ,lP
IN$
A TWAT[RPATH IF G.
In.•1
ATWOOOOA UK
7A. 32
A TWOOD IT SNP
10•S
AUBURN AVE NOT
IA-tl
AUBURN CT EO
3D•So
AUDURN On MK
.B-32
AUBURN ON VT
2C•38
AUBURN PL NW EA
So.I
AUDITORIUM STP
SA•36
AUDITORS AD MD
38,30
AUDnE. AVE E AM
33.503A-71
AUDREY OR WSP
_ 2A44
AVOUBON G.
AUDUPON AVE CNN
3�p
AUDUBON OR CNN
30-30.20-AS
AUERBACK IT RV
tD.20
A' AD ED...
]0{t
ALIGN AVE WBL
SA'
AUGSBURG AVE RF
AUGUST WAY IGH
2B•A7
AUGUSTA I OL
_ ]38."
AUGUSTA I ED .....
.... . SQSO
AUGUSTA LANE EP,..-_..
2BA0
AUGUSTA AD OOT.....«......
SCA60. IU6A
AUGUSTA RD LTT ...._«.... ..SUBB
1CA&A
A UAORA AVE SPK ...••_..._.
_. 2A•52
AURORA AVE STP
............1427
ALROAA I CP ,
AUSTINCTE ION.
__. _.. +�S9
AUSTIN ST SMK
,10-/7,IA-SS
AUST1N ST HE BN
AUSIAALMN AVE LC
ID-20
AUSTPMN PINE I MK
AD24
AUTO CLUB AO BL
... 20•A8
AUTUMN ST PM �
....2A•27
AUTUMN ST AV
_ AA-27
AUTUMN ST Me MPL
4A•26
AUTUMN TEA DO
59.36
AUTUMN CNACE BL
-D41
AUTUMN CNACE CIA BL
2U1
AUTUMN OAKS OR RA►
3C.6A
AUTUMN WOODS DR CHI
2046
AVALONAVE EO.
1G••3
AVANTI DR M" ..
aA.43
AVIGNON Of MIS
".37
AVIONCS BLVD YPL - ......
AVOCET I MO
3A.30
AVOCET ST AW CR ..... SC-•
AVON CT EP..___. ........
... SBL
AVON CT WS .._
3637
AVON OR MO ....
.. 36.30
AVON OR WO ...
30.37
AVON ST AV
... SA.27 SC- 19
AVON ST STP ..
SG27
AVON ST SV
SC.11
AVON ST N STP _.
SA•73
AVON STS STP
50.3S
AVONOALERD OV....._
Zis
AVONDALE ST MK.................
29 32
AWar510! AO MO....._......_.....
AYOEE CIA WBT................_._....
I6-73
ID•13
AYR LA MD
1C-73
AYASHIRE BLVD ED
]G3]
AZELIA AVE BC ..
40 17
AZTECOP EP ...
- 4A�7
A27EC u M"
BJ3
AZTEC 8T MIN AN ..
...... 16.2A-3
AZTEC ST NW GOT ..._
-- `A-15
AZURE RD OPN
631
AZURITE ST NW Ra
so. IA.5A-2A
B
aCT Ell
B BT con .._ _. ......
167
B ST NO
IB-Is
B ST STP
-0-]6
BABCOCK AVE NI
]A 71
BA6COCK OLVD : E_
16-14A •C-1.A
BABCOCK I wA 1
SC-73
BABCOCK TA IGt-
.BA. ;CA 5,
BACARDIAVE W ON
1651
BACARDI AVE W w
1652
BACHANAN CT E%
_ 1 2C+0
BACHE LORAVE 'AN ..........
_._ _A-13
BACON AVE E 11
JB 1.
SALON OR FA -
.. so-2
BAOOEA CT ED
...1650
BADGER LA NO....._.
2G q
BAFFIN TA IGH ... _.__........ _. 165t
BAGPIPE BLVO E'. _..'BAD
BALLS OR HS
.......30l1
RAIL" LA AK ....
tG-3
BAILEY AD NP ....
to-45
BAILEY AD INS
2A As
BAILEY ST NS
.. /D-61. M.73
SMLEY ST STP
... IA45
BAILUF PL DL
-. .__.. s"S
BAKER AVE FA
IC•10
BAKEA no EO.
30-0
BAKER AD MK..
BAKER ST FA .....
A632.4I1t0
1611
BAKER STE STP ....
.. 238
BAKER ST W STP
28.6.3
BAKER rR -
_ 4632
BAKER PARK RD YES
_. 10-14
BAKER PAPK AO MP
30-1.
Bat O EAOIF AVF W9l
IC 13•r I:
TAOtf AVE WBT
SD�,2 n1 A
7EAOLEOL VD LL
BAlMo
SO SA
SALo of BL VOE WBT
In")
BALD EAGLF BLVDW WBT
SO-12
BALD EAGLE AO NHO
AS•290
SAL OEMIA fD
2A-II
BALOUR PARK PO OR
SA-30
SAL DAIM OR AV,
1A.69
BALOWMOR CP
IC -SA
BALDWIN ST NW ER
SO.I
BALDWIN LAKE RD LL
IaSA
SAL IF ANZ RD ED.
•0-a1
CALL I SA
_. ID•Is
SALL RD BN
x•S
SALLANTINE LA SILO
3A.10
SALLANTI AE AO ED
IB-50
BALLET BLVD fR
38`0
SALMORAL LA BL
c-.,
BAIMOAAL LA EP
IS -.a
BALSA CT OAK
10.'.2
BALSAM AVE BE SY _
D-79
BALSA.LA EP ......
IBJS
BALSAM LA N DYN .......
SDIA SAGA
BALSAM I N MO...-.........
SDAA,SD•B
BALSAM IJLN PL ....__........
S616.69-2I
BALSAM AD MD....
........ 2930
BALSAM St EO
....3C•SO
BALSAM St YEO.
... .1C-N
BALSAM ST S7o...._.._.....
... .....20•28
BALSAM IT E EG .............._._.........
3C-SO
BALSAM ST SW PR .....................
...... 3C-67
BALSAM TR E ED __
3C-50
BALTIMORE ST NE BN ..
3DJ.30-S
SA1 TIMORE ST NE ML
30-1C.3A.3
BAMSILA WBT
AD. 12
BAMBLEGR EG.
2A•S8
BAMBURYLA UK.
IC-32
SANCROPT AVE ST►
38-35
SANEV Of YK .....
1A-A0
a ANFILST STP-............
6S11
DAN, II CIA B/_ ...
2A�10
BANK ST MPL ..
39-26
BANKERS OR VM..
1B•20
BANKS CT E 10M
3A-Sl
BANKS PATH F IGM
3A.51
SANN[VCA AVE MPL
.. 1626
BANNING AVE W6l
IC•1]
BANNING WAY E IGM _. 3A•51
BARTAS PT I MK ...._
... .. 1D-24
BANTAS PT AD MK
1D2A
9A Nr A,I ST AM ....
2l•IT
BARBARA AVE EMT
BAABARA AVE AM
38.71
BARBARA AVE E 1GM.
BARBA' 6T E IGH
38•AI.3ASl
3A:•5f
BARBARA DR UK
1C•32
BARBARA I BAN
s8-56
BARBARA I LL
7A•SA
AP SAT r ION
B BA C E G
3D•39
BARBERRY CIR CNN
,A.]p
BARBERRY CIR EP
'BAD
BARBE PA, I EP -
10-M
BAPCLAY PL SIP
aA.36
DARCLAV ST MIN
aD20..8.28
a ARCLAY ST STP .. _
AD28
0 ARDON AVE AM
3A.71
BA AGE CHANNEL AD S PIP
3CJ8
0AA5E CHANNEL RO W STP
BAP�UM ST NW AA
3C•36
19.2
BARKER ST HS
SD-61
BARNCS Pl MPL
10.26
BARNES TR E ION ..
]GS;
BARNES WAY E ION ...
3D51
BARNES AVE E IGH
SARRE" STP
IC-27
SAAACTT AVE OR .. ........
3C.23
BAAME RD ED
_ SA-.l
BARRINGTOtA CT UK..1AA0
BARR:NGTON OR aP-.
SA-39
BARRV AVE WAY
.... SC-23
BARAT DA NP .._.
.. .. 1645
BARRY I we? .. .....
59.12
SARTELMY LA MIN
:. 1C•21.2C-29
BAATHEL ORNE AL
2C•28
BARTLlTT BLvO MD..
1C•]0.]8.70
BARTLFTTCT STP
_2 27
DART LEY CT ION
BARTON MOIL ....
..3D51
1C-27
BASALT ST NW ST
SA -IA
BASALT SI NW RA ...
SO-2A
SASELINEAVE SC?
S668 SA•78
BASELINE AVE +LT
50.66-54•78
BASS 07 HS
40.61
BASS ST SE PR
1667
BASS CREEK AVE SO
111-0
BASS CA E EK CIA NM
BASS CREEK CT BP
IA.17
10-9
BASS LAKE AO CRY
3A.17
BASS LAAE AD MO
x•7,2a8
BASS LAKE RD NM
IA I?
BASS LAKE RD PL
SA:to
0ASSErT CA OR GV
AA25
BASSETT CAI GV
AA•25
SASSWOODCIR AKF
7C•OA
BASSWOOD CIA SW PR
BASSWOOD HAS
3C•67
.A•IB
BASSWmoI MO
38.30
DA54WO00 LA NO
19-12
BAC jW'I•JD AD Fa
SA../
BA%SWOOO AD St
1D•2S
BASSWtICD aD WB
3ea7
BASSWOOOPO SINPR
aC 67
SAT AAN SI NE BN
IDS
BATAAN ST NE NL
AD1; IA-3
BATAVIA ST 5TP.
1C.37
SATES STP
3D78
BATES ST DIN -
IS-2A
BATTLE CREEK CT STP
5A•36
BATTLE CREFR PL BTO
SA-38
... ...
BATTLE CREEK RO STP
S0-36
BAUERCIR RVT ....
.. 211-8S
BAUEPMISTERPL CON.-
-. SCAB
BAUGH ST NW ST
... 28.IA
SAVA"'ACT C"S
.._ 1.SAAA
BAVARIACT VT
1C-y
BAVARIA RD CMS ..
�SAI A
BAVARIA AD VT
1D35
BAVARIAN CT W FFI
SD 10
BAVVARIA"ARIA"PASS I fR
.... SD 10
BAPASS S FR ......
... SD 10
8AVA111AM PASS W FR.... ....
... ...... so- 10
BMITERAVE OVA .. ............. .._-•__
262A
SAXTER CT CHO................... _..._.. aB+u
SA1ErEAST CN..... ...... .... _.._..__.
. .. IAA
P
DAY AVE SW R._....._.._....
.. •
._.. 7 S•6
BAY CIA Sw ........._.......
. 8-21A
SAY CIASW _. ..__....._....._
.. 98•71A
BAY OR EP ..._.__..........
2S-A3
BAY DR SE Fl.-.-_...-».............
2A. W.
BAY I UK ........ .... ............
.IAJ7
SAY LAW NO......_..._...«.._
... 1612
SAY Sr GPM _... ._.._.._.........
....ACJI
BAY ST MN ... _.
... 1A-32
BAY ST STP ..
. _SS-3S
BAY $7 TOY --.
- - . 10-31
BAY RIDGE RD MO ...
SAY RIDGE RO OR ..
. 1CJ0
2A•31
BA1•AAD AVE STP
2C-05
DAYS, PRY AVE SW
IA 21A
SAVBEPPY AVE CT SW _
SA 21A
SAVCLIFF OR Yr
IA-30
SAYCLIFF RD MTR
3A.38
SAYFIELDST STP _
..3AJ6
BAYLESS STP ..
2C-27
BAVL. WA MO _.
to•1
BAYLESS Pl STP .
... .2C-27
%ArLOACT EO .... _. _...
.... _.20-50
SAYLOR ST NE CT .....
... 4C-3A
DAYPOINT OR FL
361E
BAYPORT AD MD
06.30
BAVRIDGE I BL
IAAl
DATA IOGE AO MD ..
2F30
BArS,OF AD OR
.C-:.2.SC•22
BAYSWATER
IQ37
BAY SW AT ER RD 5"A ..
BAVVIEW CIA NE PR . _.......
........ •C-]t
_..... 10.$a
SAYVIEW CT DON ........_....».......
.. .3Q]I
SAYV,EW DR AV..............._._..
... ILA
BAVVIEW DR VT ........_...._..___....]AJD
BAWIEWEWW PLPL oSPa
. 5630
BAYVIP
AB•30
BAYVIEW PL VT
3A.30
SAPWOOD I EP
. - 2613
SAPWOOD LA MO .
3A.30
SAYWOOD TER EP ...................
. .. 2610
SEACMCIA EP
IB10
BEACH OR FL
11,E
BEACH OR ANF
=4
BEACH LA MIS ., .....263t
BEACH AD EB ........... ......36 tC
BEACH RO EP .....
_.. •S•10
BEACH AD NO
BEACH AD" OPH
2Q218
BEACH ST NE PR
... 6a60
H" t R MK
BEAC OE D
S ]
a 3
BEACHWDE AD
IBJO
AVE_..
BEACHWOOD E ....
IT
BEACHWOOD AVE STP
C-72
_. 2O.3S
RO MD ...
BEACON
....3637
AVE
BEACON AVE STP ...
.....3637
BEACON CIR
..30.32
BEACON CA U
2D72
V
BEACONLA AV ...
SA•89
BEACON ST
3SO.19.3A•27
BEACON Sr SEE AC _
BEACON HILL CI ...
5676
2A.38
BEACON MILL CTT 0 EO ....
2A.Bp
BEACON HILL AD EQ._..
_. _3A-p2
BEACON HILL RD MK ...
....]OJT
BEACONSFIFlFLp RD WL ....
....
SEAR MD ..
•..671
a29B
BEAM V ...
3,
BEAM LA to .
.. 3DA3
BEAMOMC AV
-6B•S/
BEAN ST AK
.. ID-2
BEAA AVE N VH
...IA:20
BEAR AVE S VI
2A20
BEAR CT WOL --
. A621
BEAR PAIN TR EO
BEARD AVE N BC
10-50
E0.9.5A.11
BEARD AVE N SO _..
... ... SIC
SEARS AVE N RB _.
_. 6_"
BEARD AVE S BL
BEARD AVE 5 BAN .. ....
SUE
So-so
4
BFARDAVf SEo
SARI
BI.AAD ALE + AIPL
xJ3
RFARD C, AL
s0:.6
WARD CT ED
SD 13
oFARDCTN SO
So
a,. -DPI ED
BARD AD Bl
SDII
BEARS ST AK
D7
6EATPICE ST EO
ID..3
BEAU-DRUE DR EG
IC -SO
BFAUMONT STP
2D 28
BEAUMONT AVE SIL
3A-05 3w.77
BEAUMONTOLVD STL.
..... 3D77
SEA UNION? BT MW
BEAUMONT WAY STL .. .-..
.. 7D65
BEAVER CT EO
.. to SO
BEAVER ST BTP ...
_._. G36
BEAVER ST WBT _..
... to 13
BEAVER STE of ...
3D T6
EAV
BER ST W BEL..._....
.. 2D76
BEAVER TN MK ....
... C.31
BEAVER DAM RD EO
ID-50
BEAVER DAM ST WAY
+C-23
DEAVERwOOO RD MK. ...
5CJ1
BECHTOLDRD CDR...-_ ........
3D411
BECHTOLD RD N116....-...._........
3C48
BECKER RD IND .............
'G1•
BECKMAN AVE AM . ................
2D.19
8EOERWOOD DR OR..
5C 22
BEDFORD SIR _..
2D:B
BEDFOROAVE ED.. .....
3D33
A E O DD .. ._......
BEDf a P
3C-13
EDFORo RO MD..._.__ ...._...-...1G-30
SEOf OAJ ST YPI....... ...........
... ..... ID27
BEEBE AVE YN .........
IC-38
BEEBE PKWV MIN ........
It-71
BEEBE RD MW
BEEBE LAKE RD MAN
--. 18.40
BEF-HST CHI .-
ID+e
BEEG" IT FM ....
4082
13EICHS7 FR ..
3A.10
DEECHST STP . __.........
........... 3D78
DEECNEPDA ED
..M_
Be ECNwoODPI STP .
1C-35
BEEHIVE CT EP _
_. "BAD
BE HRLE AVE EX
20-31
BEEMAN PL EA ..
2D-31
BEERS AVE E IGM _
... 3C-HI
BELAIR CIA RV ..
•C. 19
BELANGEROA AR IAA
BELDEN BLVDI CO. _.......«.... ... 1652
BEIDONOR SA
BELL CIR MK
$A l2
BELL GR W MK ..
... .6A-79
BELL ST EX ...
.. 2D31
BELL ST SB
1D-30A
BELLAIRE AVE MIN ..
1C-21
6ELLAIRE AVE WSL ...
28.21
BELLAIRE AVE WST.............
- -2A.21
IR WAY FR....
BELu !
A.
t..._«.___»_-.2 0
BE LND AV! 1I11 ........_«......._.....7670
BELAVE WSL.....___....._.._..._
2620
BELLELEIMV _ .........._.....»...261t
ST
BELLE ST SRN -....._........._.
]C•6
BE87 Siv ....._......_..�.:.:f636
B E ILE AIRE OR CN .. ............._.......
fA-A
BELLEVUE OP UK _....................
3CJ7
BEILNAM AVE UK .,..,.._......... SAJ9
BELLOWBAVE WS►.......»._....._.... lC.78
13ELLOWSST BTP _...........__.__.
26II
BEIIWOODAVE MW.... .....
............. 2A.78
BELLWOOD RD MD_
...IC•30
BELMONT AVE MPI......_.....__....._..2D3.
8ELMONT AVE RV...__-_....._••».... SA-27
BELMONT CT AV.........._._„_».._... I8-57
BELMONT OR WL__.......................... .B-37
DELMONT LA MO __--.--.._.._.......
7BJ:
Be LMONT I MW - ._«_».«.._........
BELMONT I N8► .�..........
1A-28
..._. lA•20
DELMONTI RV........................_....5A.27
BELMONT AD AV ..........
......._...66s7
BELMONT RD UK _.._.........._...So
21
6ELMORE AVE ED ..._......
..... _..... 1C•33
BE LTINE SL .. ..........__...
.IB•33
BELTINE W ED
IC.A1
ELWDEaE LA ........„
aELWDEREWST SP ......, ....._.......
Bf LWOERE STE STP......_............3CJ8
--.......1611
.3C•36
BENCE ACT CNS.......
IS•A6
BENDER RD CNS.........
CENOER ST NE CT..._. ..._. ...
. 5615A
MID
BENGAL AVE AM .......
IG59
DENDALCT VT ............. ..........
.IC•33
BENHILL RD SIP..... ...... „........
BENJAMtN PL CM __.._.....»_..„..
- .4043
.. .. 3616
BENJAMIN ST NE CN......_._...............SB•18
BENJAMIN DT Me FR ....._...._....«......60
10
OENJAMIN ST NE YPI.._....«-.. ...»-
-...6a 18
. ,'6F "'I
29
IARr A,1F A'Jr YF O.I
10-1 tA.2P
LAKr RlLtriF DO M/1
1A�9
IAMAR AVf N NST
1C SC
NE wAN
18..q
IAKI rIII✓.F DR VIOL
1D 13
LAMAR AVF S CO 2D-.SA20-52A
I AI,I I•'A,' 1L
2-7q
LAKF RIIFr DI VD CwN
.A•.9
UWBEPT IVE MV
2811
LC
J( 20
LAAF pO ADAIf RD
.0 1I
LAMDF RIOM AO MD
.C-30
30 70
LAN1 A0',E CIA 4K
2A..0
LAME TI LA SV
:10,
t Ar L.•, rA C:r. Ol
30 13
LAKF ROSE DR MK
2D-32
LAMONT AVE NE AL
IB-2B
LA O',TA Du Ut
30. 17
IAKF ROSE LA UK
2A..0
LAMONt CIR HE AL
IC•7B
I 01. C'N RAY
2C.Sr
LAKE SARAN OP$ IND
IA-14 SA•14A
LAMOTF OR CV
.C•SA
t Ar!1-A LA BPY
IC.S7
LAKE SARAN OP W GRN
SD-9A
LAMOTE Da \L
.C-SA
I.CPOSSE AVF SIP
SC45
LAKE SARAN OD IND
16.14, •tiA
LAMPERI AVER LE
2D49A
•`I PN°/" eP
SD•9
LAKE SARAN HEIGHTS CI a
2A•14
LAMUMERE OR MH
ZA•25
LAI.DIf AD SLP
AA.10
LAKE $APAM HEIGHTS OR IN 3A. 14
LAMPLIGHT CIO IYB
3C-77
LADIEPA AVE MPL
1C-79
LAKE SARAN MIS OR GRN
2"
LAMPLIGNTCT WB
3C•37
LAOv B�aD LA SPIN
20-S7
LAKE SHOPE AVE LC
2C.20
LAMPLK7NT DR we
3C•37
LAAAVETTEAVE EA
_. 20-0I
LAKf SNORE AVE WED
AG i.
LAMPLKTMTER LA OV ....._..
.. 3A•23
A AVE LA MO _
2A-30
LAKE SNORE AVE UK
2D•32
LAMPLIGHTEPI LA MK .......
5C-0/
.Q.E
LAFAYETEU SPP
.B•]O
LAKE SNORE BLVD MK.
-.... tAJ7
UNCASTER AVE SL
!C•25
LAi ArETERD WIG _.
.. 2&.31
LAKE SNORE OR EB .. _.
.. KB - IC
LNCASTER UN MO
10•4.IA4
LAF.YETE AD SIP
20.29
LAKE SNORE OP EP...._
_... 20•40
UNCASTER LAN PL ._.. 1C•1T•1A•2!
LAFAYETTE AD w OR
18.31
LAKE SHORE OR RF
...__.. 18•2
UNCASTER $T M11.........„.....»_.._.
1D•2S
LAFAIIC CST FR
.. _. 2A:10
LANE SHOPE DR $ IND
...... _. 30.4 4
LA4CELOT CT MK_.... _-».«... «......IC•32
LAFAVETE 90FEWAY SIR
3B->e
LAKF SIDE CT LC ........
....._ 3C-20
LAMCELOT ON MK... _... _.„...._...-.
IC-32
LArArETE RIDGE CT OR
....5840
LAKE SUMMITCT BV ...............»..-...SB•19
LANCER GA SLT._......._..»«....__....3A-79
LAFAYETE M. RD MTB.
M.
... I",
LAKE VIEW OR MMO _..R........
. A629B
LANOAUCIR OIL _... »..
.... lC•49
LAFONOAVE
- . AA-37
LAKE VIEW OR BHK ..___.__.,..-,
. SC -SA
LANDAU CUR BL ..__...»»...__......IC40
LAGOON AVE MPL _. . ._.._..._.
q•3A
LAKE VIROINIA OR 6NR__....._..__...A•39
LANDAU OR BL. _........„...„»»............
LAGOON OR 511R
LAGOON ST VM
._..0.30
U•9.
LAKEBRDOK NB ..
LAKEHILL CIR WBL ..
tell
. IA•21
LANDAU DP wB
UNDER AVE NE AL
....M•]7
GA."
.. 1B•7B
LAGOOA GR EP
.. �aB-.7
UKEUND MO.
504A
LANDER GR NE AL. _..
... 1C-28
LJIGVNA OR ED --
_.B•.1
UKEUND AvE N
_..._. 2C-9
LANDEASTHWER..
3D.I
LANTILA MK
IA.33
LAKE LAND AVE CRY....
....._I,,,
LANE CIR WSP.............
1D-36
LAIGLE AVE Lv
111.4910.01
LAKELAND AVE RB .__. _............AC•
17
LANE CT V......._.....................
7C-.
LAKAA/AGA TAN MST
2B•3C
LAKELANOCAI EP
...... 5A..9
......
LANE PL SIP ..._...„......_. ._...........
.D. 2e
LAKE AVE SIN7A•21
LANGLAND OR MK
...._... ID•32
LANE ST SSP _...... ........._.......»..._
3D-35
LAKE AVE CAN
.W31
LA. LAND RD MK
.......... 10.32
LANEWODOCR EP ..........
5D�3
LAKE AVE LC ..... ..
10.20
LARELANOTER EP.
......... 58-.9
LANEWOOD CT N MO._...._.�.......
2A-4
LAKE AVE 5V
.B•tt
LAKELAND SHOP" RD LS
3A.310
LANEWOOO UN MO«„...„._. ..
2C-9
LAKE AVE WBL
50.1. +G/3
LAKEPIDGE AD ED _
_. 2D-33
LANEwOOD UM PL......... _..30.1S.2B-2.
LAKE AVE wal
'.A-+3
IAKESHOPE OR AT _..
1642
LANGDON LA MO ........................
_. 20.30
LAKE BLVD 4SP
2C:21
LAKES -ORE PL AN ..
30.1t
LANGER AVE WSP ........... .............2045
LAKE BLVON FLY
20..E
LAKESIDE AVE BC
.B-n
LANGERCIR WSP........... _„.....
,.20.38
LAKE CIR AM
0A•9
LAKESIDE AVE CA,MPL
.B•B
LANOFnaO AVE B
LAKE Ci BPN
$O•.7
LAKESIDE AVE MPL
2C•79
LT ..........1C.U.1C.75
LANGFORp BLVU !LT _.. _......_
....
LAKE _V AB
.C-t7
LAKESIDE AVE SE PR
.047
LANGfORD CT ED..._
....IA.A7
LAKE OnCA
1C•5A
LAKESIDE CIR ED .....
30-50
LANGFORD CIA ED _�_.._....�...
IAJI
LAKE DO LL
30-SA
LAKESIDE CT LC
3C.20
LAORD PARK SIP ......_»......
_...2C.27
LANE ON 4N
SB•43
LAKESIDE DR DAY
30_210
LANGFOADWAY SLT.-_....__........./G:
LAKE OR PL
SA4.
LAKESIDE OR EO
SD -SO
LANGNEINZ LA SHK ......._._.._._.».
20A7
LAKE 6P RB
aC-17
LAKESIOE CIA SIN .. _._
tD-13B
LANGLEY AVE Lv ....... .................
1949
LAKE OR $IN
5041A
LAKESIDE LA WD ..
3A.30
LANGLEY AVE SrT
LAKE OR C.%
5C.39
LAKESIOE RL BC __
_. .B-n
LANGLEY AVf N NST
LAKE OR HE CT
.A.3A
LAKESIOf ID FA
5B.10
LANOLfY CTN US?
1C•3C
LAKE LA AN
26•19
LAKETOWN AD LT 5D-39A
SB-.fB
LANGLV AVE S CO 2D•AU,2A•52A
LAKI! ni MPL
10.2E
LAKEVIEW SIR
.C-27
LAMOLV CT N LE ._.
20.29A
LC.4
.A•39
LAKEVIEW AVE AN
.C.19
LANHAM LA f0 _
.. 28•.1
LAKE AD EG
SD•50
LAKEVIEW AVE SC
40.17
LANNON AVE NE AL .........
IC•20
LANE AO M-11
1B•71
LAKEVIEW AVE OAM
18.31
LANNON AD BAN ........ .......... __.
_....0-.9
LA CA TBV
1041
LAKEVIEw AVE ED
SC -IC
LANSFORD LA MN ......... _„......_...
SA4 3
LAKE AD WB
30.371CL 3?A
LAKEVIEW AVE LGL ..
0-23
LANSING AVE N 07.. . ......
28. 13A
LAKE SI BAY
3D-218
LAKEVIEW AVE LL.
5D•SA
LANTANA LA ED .....„.„..
LAKE ST COL
15-SU
LAKEVIEW AVE MH „
30-43
LANTERN CIA LL _.
3C•SA
LAKE ST FI-
20.1E
LAKEVIEW AJE M% ...
50.23
LANTERN LA LL ..
...1E-9A
LAKE ST HIS
'"I
LAKEVIEW AVE MT .. ...
1A-21
LANLIS CT MW ..
20.20
LAKE ST LC
LAKE ST l0
20.20.3C•20
.. 10 27
LAKEVIEW AVE OR ..
LAKEVIEW AVE A13
2C 23
.C-17
LAPOR7 DR MV ..
LARABEE DA HE AL ........
.. fA•tl
IA-11
LAKE ST l0\
__. 3B•23
UKEWEW AVE AS
18• 2
LARADA LA ED _... ......
20.33
LAKE $I UK
10.32
LAKEVIEW AVE AV .........._.
.C.19
LARAMIE TR BP .....
1B•10
LAKE SI PIS
1C•92
LAKEVIEW AVE TOY _...
2C41
LARAMIE IN UK
. M32
LAKE $I STP
10."
LAKEVIEW AVE WBL ...._.......
ID. 13
LARC INDUSTRIAL BLVD BAN
44•37
LANE $T SW
50-21A
LAKEVIEW AVE WBi ............_...
58•12
LARCH LAN DL•N....... ....... ...
.S0.2A
LAKE ST WAY
SC•23
LAKEVIEW CIA BL _._-.__...
2D•.1
LARCHMO........._..... .
4"
ST WC
LAKES
- 10.39A
LAKEVIEW CIA COP..__ .............
50.8
LARCH U N PL __._._ _._.-AB•t9.AB•2.
LAKE S71 MAL
U-3.
LAKEVIEW CIR LT ._..„_...._.
3B•.9A
IRCH $I SIP ......_................
_. 10.29
LAKE ST N SW
ID•136
LAKEVIEW CIR LVT ...............
ID-54
LARCH ST MW AN.........»............
I"
LAKE 5T HE HO
.. 10-33
LAKEVIEW CIR SE PR __...._......_....
.. SA47
LARCMST NW CA ......_......__.....104.1E-5
LAKE $I W CA
20.31
LAKEVIEW OR BL ........._............20-41
URCNMe)Rf AVE MK...._«.._.......
IA.=
LAK[ $7 W MPL
_ 2A4.
LAKEVIEW OR BAN .. ............._...
. 30.57
LAACNWOC )CIR MK»_
_._. 1N2
LAKE ST W OR
. -22
LAKEVIEW OR ED ...._.................."'
LARCHWOOD OR MK.«.»...«„._........
19-32
LAKE ST Rr SL
]B4]
LAKEVIEW OR HS .. .. ...
._..........0."
LAREDO CT COP. ...... „-......_.....
_.._..A67
LAKE HIRES BLVD WBL
5A•20.18-21
LAKEVIEW OR LL
IC -SA
LAREDO OR CNN ........ ..» ...............
4W0
LAKE BAYVIEW C' SV
LAKE BEACH CT OR SV
SB•12
-II
UKEWEW OR UK
LAKEVIEW DA MTA
50.2..104S
2D-30,2A•39
LAREDO LA CNN ....... ... ........ _........
LAREDO PATH LV.... „.... ..........
ACAS
...... . IC•Sl
LAKE BEACHCTE SV
.&11
LAKEVIEW DR SLT .
.. 2"?
LARENCEST WBL..„.._.......
50.12
LAKE BEACH CTw SV
..AB•11
LAKEVIEW DR $v
SC•If
LA GE AVE MEAI «.._.....__.
IC-28
LAKE BREEZE Al • BC
.B•q
LAKEVIEW LA LT
.. 30•.W
LARK AVE MW .,..-.._._».-.._. 2A.29.SA•29
LAKE COURT OR MV ..
IS•,%
LAKEVIEW LA OAK -
SC-24
LARKIN C:R MK....._..-...._....... ..
30.24
LAKE COVE CT BV _.._
_. 58.19
LAKEVIEW LA SLP .
SA•10
LARKIN OR MK................................
30.24
LARE CURVE LA BC
AJL•17
LAKEVIEW LA WAY ..
SC•23
LARKIN RD COO _..... ..........«.._....
3CA
LAKE DIANNE CT NO
SC•10
LAKEVIEW PL UK
40-32
LARKSPUR AVE III NBT ........_.......
I3C
LAKE ELMO AVE N GT 2D-13A•2A•2IA
LAKEVIEW AD OL _.
2D41
LARKSPURLA 60.... .............„.. .....
.D-.1
LAKE ELMO AVE N LE 2D•21A,2A•37A
LAKEVIEW RD WED ..
40.15
LAAKSPUALA EP .....«......«....„....
.A4
LAKE FALL DR EP
..... BA-47
LAKEVIEW TER OR ....
._ 20.23
LARKSPUR LA NO..._._......._..«......
1C 12
LAKE OEOROE BLVD MINDOT
.. _. 3B•16
LAKEVIEW AT DR ED
...C•IC
LARMA LA ED. . .............._.._....
_, 1D. 33
LAKE ORACECIA CHS ..
..._. SB.AOA
LAKEVIEW TERRACE BLVD VJT .,.
LARPENTEURAVE FN.............«....
70.77
LA3 NAZELTINE OR CMS
2A49
.. . SC-3E01C.3EA
LARPENTEVA AVE LO .
10.27
LAME HVOHET NO'NO
LAKE JANE TA 4 LE
39•14A
50.21•.A•29
LA"BLVD FM....
LAKEVILLE BLVD LV
7C-87
SC-41
URPENTEUR AVE MW.. iB•29.1 Dm 72
LAAPENTEURAVE STP 48 27
LAKE JOHANNA BLVD AN.
.. 36•19
LAKEWAV TEA 9NR
3C-31
LARRY LA MR
IB-.5
LAKE LINDEN OR SMA
2A•32
LAKEWOOD WW. ..
IA•22
LARRY NO OR SIP..
IA.37
LAKE LUCY RD CNN
2A-39
LAKEWOOD AVE WST.,„
..2-13.2A•21
LARSON CT SV....
5C-'1
LAKE NETA ORE NL
AD -IC
LAKEWOOD CIR LIT_
SB•.9B
LARSON LA SV
-SC-11
LAKE OAKS OR Cv
.B• I1
LAKEWOOD ON MW .,._..._
1C•21,IC•37
LARSON RD CON ,.
...AA-S
LAKE PARK CM EG
30-50
LAKEWOODOR SLP _._
.A•10
LARSOM RD SV ._
..SC-1I
LAKE PARK CT EG
3D.50
LAKEWOODLA OW
2A.21
LASALLE WAY ...
.... 1D.2.
LAKE PARK OR EG
3D•50
LAKEWOODLA MD
30.10
LASALLE AVE MPL
M29
LAKE POINT CT SV
$D-11
LAKEWO0 HILLS RD N EO
50.50
IJLSALLE Ga HEAL .._..... _
.. 10.28
LAKE afOECCARDf GAN
.D-SA
LAKEWOOD HILLSADS EG
.SO-SO
LASALLE ST SIR ........... -._..........__?Od7
LAKE REBECCA ROE INO
.. AA• MA
LAROTA LA CNN...
.044,
LASSEN CT BAN ..... ........................
4B•57
J.
Bonestroo
Rosene
Anderlik &
Associates
Engineers & Architects
January 28, 1988
City of Orono
Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Attn: Mr John Gerhardson
Re: Hackberry Park Well
Orono, MN
File No. 13932
Dear John:
Otto G 8onestroo. PE
Keith A Gordon. PE
Thomas W Peterson. PE
Robert W Rosen, PE
Rrcfsard Ur Foster. PE
Michael C Lynich. PE
Joseph C Anderbk. PE
Donald C Surgardt. PE
James R Maland, PE
Bradford A Lemberg. PE
lerry A Bourdon, PE
Kenneth P Anderson, PE
RKhard E Tumer, PIP
Mark A Hanson. PE
Keith A Bachmann. PE
James C Olson. PE
Ted K Field. PE
Mark R Rolls, PE
Glenn R Cook. PE
Michael T Rautmann. PE
Robert C Russell. A 1 A
Thomas E Noyes. PE
Robert R Pfefferle. PE
Thomas E Angus, PE
Robert G Schurncht, PE
Dawd O Loskota. PE
Howard A Sanford, PE
Marvm L Sorvala. PE
NUNCIL MEETING
F78 - 81988
CITY OF ORQ."
Charles A ErKksOn
Leo M Pawelsky
Harlan M Olson
Susan M Ebeo�h
Mark A Se-p
Enclosed is request for payment No. 1 for approval.The payment request lists
Change Order No. 1 which is being sent to the City through the Contractor.
Change order No. 1, includes reducing the pump column pipe from 2 to 1 1/2 to
allow more room for power cables. The pump furnished for this project has a
steep preformance curve and the reduction in column size has no effect on well
capacity. We therefore recommend that the change be approved.
The project specifications assumed that a suitable gravel layer for the well
would be found at appruximatley 200 feet. The actual gravel layer (aquifer)
was found at 230 to ^_58 feet and the 8 feet long screen was set at 241 feet.
Therefore, the quanties for drilling, casing and screen are more than listed
on the original proposal. The cost due to the additional depth is $731.00 for
an increase in project cost of 6%.
The project was essentially completed in late December. The only work re-
maining are the concrete slabs around the pitless and street washer. We re-
commend that 5% retainage be held until remaiT,ing items are completed in the
spring.
Yours very truly,
BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK S ASSOCIATES, INC.
Richard W. Foster
FWF:br
8014f
2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600
JABonestroo
Rosene
N Anderlik &
Associates
Engineers & Architects
February 1, 1988
City of Orono
Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Attn: Mr. John Gerhardson
Re: Hackberry Park Well
Orono, Minnesota
File No. 13932
Dear John:
Oho G Bonestroo, ►E.
Kenn A. Gordon, ►E
Thomas W. Frierson. PE.
Charles A ViCkson
Robert W Rosen. PE
RKhard W Foster, Pt,�
MKhael C. Lynch, PE
Leo M Pawelsky
Joseph C. Andrrkk. ►E
Donald C Ourgardt, ►E.
lames B. Malam. PE.
Harlan Ad Olson
Bradford A. Lemberg, ►E.
Jerry A Bourdon, PE
Kernrth ► Anderson. ►E.
Susan M. Eberltn
RKhard U Unef. ►E.
Mark A. Hanson, PE.
KeKh A BKhmann, PE.
Mark A. Selp
Ames C. Olson, ►E.
Ted K Field. P.E.
Mark R. Rolf . PE.
Gtem R Coot, /E
MKhael T. Rautinam, PE.
Robert C Russek. A I A.
Thomas E. No`es. PE
Robert R. Plefferlr, ►E.
Thomas E. Angus. ►E
Robert G SchunKht. ►E
Davrd 0. Loskola. ►E.
Howard A. Sanford. PE.
Marvin L Sorvata, PE.
Enclosed is Change Order No. 2 covering the increased well quantities as you
requested. Also included is a revised payment request which incor -)rates
Change Order No. 2. If any other adjustments are required, please contact us.
Yours very truly,
BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERL7K b ASSOCIATES, INC.
/�1 rl, r
Richard W. Foster �C
RWF/asw
Enclosures
cc: E. H. Renner 6 Sons
7692e
2335 West Highway 36 9 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 9 612-636-4600
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT
DATE: January 26, 1988
PLACE: Orono, Minnesota
PROJECT: Hackberry Park Well, Pump b Pressure System
PROJECT NO.: F'LE NO.: 13932
CONTRACTOR: E. H. Renner 6 Sons, Inc.
ADDRESS: 15688 Jarvis Street Northwest
Elk River, Minnesota 55330
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 1 (Revised)
FOR PERIOD:
From: Start
SPECIFIED CONTRACT
COMPLETION DATE:
To Jan. 15, 1988
45 consecutive calendar days
from the time of written notice
to proceed
SUMMARY:
1. Original Contract Amount
2. Change Order - ADDITION $ 731.00
3. Change Order - DEDUCTION $ 86.94
4. Revised Contract Amount
5. Value Completed to Date
6. Material on Hand
7. Amount Eart;od
8. Less Retainage 5 %
9. Sub -Total
10. Less Amount Paid Previously
11. AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 1 (Revised)
OWNER APPROVAL:
By
By
Late:
$ 11,267.50
$ 11,911.56
$ 11,911.56
$
0.00
$ 11,911.56
$
595.58
$ 11,315.98
$
0.00
$ 11,315.98
Recommended for Approval by:
BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6
ASSOCIATES, INC.
Approved By:
By:
E. H. Renner 6 Sons, Inc.
Contractor
76S,2e-D-031
Project: Hackberry Park Well, Pump b Pressure System
Orono, Minnesota
Contractar: E. H. Renner b Sons, Inc.
Contract Item
BASE BID
ITEM NO. 1 - WELL
STATEMENT OF WORK
Unit
Unit Price
Payment No: 1 (Revised)
File No: 13932
Date: January 26, 1988
Est'd Quantity Amount
Quantity To Date To Date
Furnish and install a well, pump,
pitless adapter tank, electrical
controls, all electrical work and
related appurtenances, except items
listed below, described in the
specifications and shown on the
plans for the LUMP SUM of
L.S.
$7,885.00
L.S.
Drill open hole for 4" well
L.F.
6.50
200
4" Well casing including seal
L.F.
4.50
195
4" Stainless steel. well screen
including gravel pack
L.F.
58.00
5
TOTAL
ITEM NO. 1 ..............
ITEM NO. 2 - SKATING POND UNDERGROUND
PIPING
1-1/2" Type K copper w/7' cover
1-1/2" curb stop and boa:
2" Non -freeze street washer
w/concrete base
CHANCE ORDER NO. 1
Deduct for changing 2" column pipe
to 1-1/2" column pipe
7692e
i
I
i
L.S.
I'
I
$7,6` 00
,
200
1,361.00
195
877.50
5
290.00
*$10,352.50
L.F. $14.00 10 10 $140.00
I
Each 190.00 1 1 190.00
l�
Ea 585.00 1 1 585.00 i
TOTAL ITEM N0. 2 ............... $915.00
L.F. $0.69 126 126-$86.94
Page 1.
Project: Hackber-y Park Wcll, Pump & Pressure System
Orono, Minnesota
Contractor: E. H. Renner & Sons, Inc.
Contract Item
STATEMENT OF WORK
Unit
Unit Price
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
Increase in well quantities for deeper well:
1. Drill open hole for 4" wcll L.F. $6.50
2. 4" Well casing incl. seal L.F. 4.50
3. 3J4" Well screen L.F. 58.00
TOTAL CHANGE OIL
Payment No: 1
File No• 13932
Date: January 26, 1988
Est'd Quantity Amount
Quantity To Date To Date
58
40
3
2 - ADD .......
$377.00
18U.00
174.00
$731.00
TOTAL ITEM NO. 1 $10,352.50
TOTAL ITEM NO. 2 915.00
TOTAL CHANGE ORDE 1 -86.94
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 731.00
TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE ............ $11,911.5b
Page 2.
7692e
TECT PAYMENT STATUS
CITY: Oro,io, Minnee.:s
PROJE('T: Hackberry Park Well, Pump and Pressure System
FILE NO.. 13932
CONTRACTOR: E. H. Renner S Sons Inc., 15688 Jarvis St. NW, Elk River, Mi, 55S30
ORIGINAL COt+TRACT AMT. TOTAL AMT. OF C.O.'S REVISED CONTRACT AMT.
011,267.50 $644.06 $11,911.56
Date C_ Description Amount
1-26-88 `.'� _ Deduct for changing 2" column pipe to 1-1/2" column pipe-$86.94
1-1-88 #2 Increase in well qua•-,,_ities for deeper well 731.00
#3
#4
#5
"otal Change Orde ..... $644.06
ROJEVf PA I-f NT SUMMARY:
it Period Payment Value
im To Th+, Voucher Completed Retainage
1. 1-15-88 $11,315.98 $11,911.56 $595.58
2
e
total Payment To Date $11,315.98
Retainage Fo- Payment # 1 595.58
Equals Total Value Completed $l3,911.56
7692e
UWIL ME i ING
F
8 19 88
CHANGE ORDER
CITY
OF ORONO
DATE:
January 26, 1988
PLACE:
Orono, Minnesota
FILE NO: 13932
PROJECT
Hackberry Park Well, Pump & Pressure System
CONTRP-i :
E. H. Renner & Sons, Inc., 15688 Jarvis St.
N.W.,
Elk River, MN 55330
CHANGE ORDER NO: 1
DESCRIPTION OF WORK:
Change 2" column pipe `o 1-1/2, column pipe to provide additional space for motor power
cables for a Deduct of:
Est'd Total
Change Order Item lit Price Quantity Amount
Change to 1-1/2' column pipe L.F. $0.69 126 $86.94
TOTAL THIS CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - DEDUCT ................ $86.94
Original Contract Amount $11,267.50
Previous Change Orders 0.00
THIS CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 DUCT -86.94
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT ......... $11,180.56
Approved by: City of Orono, Minnesota
By Mayer
By_ ;1erk
Date:
CO-1 -32-1
Recommended for Approval by:
BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK &
ASSOCIATES, INC.
By
.-jproved by: E. H. Renner
%& Sons, Inc.
By
P _stribution
1 - City -
2 - Contractor
1 - Engineer j
CHANGE ORDER
DATE% February 2, 1988
PLACE: Orono, Minnesota FILE N0: 13932
PROJECT: Hackberry Park Well, Pump & Pressure System
CONTRACTOR: E. H. Renner & Sons, Inc., 15688 Jarvis St. N.W., Elk River, MN 55330
CHANGE ORDER NO: 2
DESCRIPTION OF WORK:
The gravel aquifer was deeper than anticipated by the
contract quantities. The
contract
quantities are hereby increased to
reflect the deeper well.
Est'd
Total
Change Order Item
Unit
Price
Quantity
Amount
1. Drill open hole for 4' well
L.F.
$6.50
58
$377.00
2. 4' Well casing including seal
L.F.
4.50
40
1A0.00
3. 4' Well screen
L.F.
58.00
3
174.00
TOTAL THIS
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 -
ADD .........•........
$731.00
Original Contract .,ant
$11.267.50
Previous Change Orders
-86.94
THIS CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
- ADD
731.00
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT
..........
$11,911.56
Recnmmended for Approval by:
BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK &
ASSOCIATES. INC.
By mot..! -=..mot /`
Approved bys E. H. Renner & Sons, Inc.
By
Approved by: City of Orono, Minnesota
By Mayor
By Clerk
Date:
Distribution
1 - City
2 - Contractor
1 - Engineer
CO-13932-1
2488.4
CI-ANCll MEETING
FEB - 81988
TO: Mayor and City Council CITY OF ORONO
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
DATE: February 4, 1988
SUBJECT: Planning Commission Appointment ___ 4/l/88
ISSUE - Determine if the Council desires to seek other applicants
for the positions that will expire March 31.
INTRODU_UTION - The positions held by Ed Cohen and JameF Hansen
expire the end of March 1988. Both have expressed interest in
continuing. Ed Cohen was appointed in February 1987 and Jim
Hansen in September 1986.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Appoint the incumbents to their first three year
term commencing 1 April 1988.
2. Seek other applicants including applicants from
1987.
RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that given the short terms of
the appointments of these two individuals and their interest in
their development as members that they be appointed to their
first three year term.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the Orono
Council appoint Ed Cohen and James Hansen each to three year
terms as members of the Planning Commission. Each term shall
expire on March 31, 1991. Ayes __, Nays __
Ci-sU fCIL MEETING
F78 - 819H
TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator CITY OF OROM
FROM: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director 1 f
DATE: February 3, 1988
SUBJ: Park Commission Appointments
For 1988, th Park Commission has five members whose commission
expired December 31, 1987.
The commission members have all expressed an interest in
reappointment with the exception of one. In addition to the
reappointing of four of the members, it is also appropriate to
stagger the expiration dates to avoid this many expirations at
one time.
The following are the members interested in reappointment and the
suggested expiration dates:
Robert Kost, Chairperson
Philip Bradley
Virginia Sweatt
Tom Casey
Expire December 31, 1988
Expire December 31, 1990
Expire December 31, 1990
Expire December 31, 1990
.ariann Kienzler will be moving from the City in April and has
requested to not be reappointed.
Recommendation - To reappoint the above Park Commission members
to the term outlined above and to not reappoint Mariann Kienzler
whose commission expired December 31, 1?87.
PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by Y, seconded by _, to reappoint the
following Park Commission members to the term inodicated and and
to not reappoint Mariann Kienzler whose commission expired
December 31, 19871 on,-J ,,jl b{ mov,n` 4r,m, +hc Ct,j ;.-) Ap/i I
Robert Kost, Chairperson
Philip Bradley
Virginia Sweatt
Tom Casey
Ayes _, Nays
pp/203.1
Expire December 31, 1988
Expire December 31, 1990
Expire December 31, 1990
Expire December 31, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Council
W,��//
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City AdminisLratJ
Forwarded reconunending approval. Staff is currentl} aetermining if
last year's applicants are still interested in the va4ancy creatt d by
Mariann Kienzler not seeking reappointment. This will be brough to
your next meetinc.
123087.7(49) r6
TO: Mayor and City Council (l,�
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City AdministratV
DATE: January 29, 1987
SUBJECT: Facilities Space Study
Attachments: A. Final Draft Space Study
B. Site Requirements Examples
ISSUES -
1. Review, comment and accept the space study as it
relates to existing and expansion space needs.
2. Determine if Phase II of the study is to be
undertaken and, if so, which alternatives are to be
studied.
INTRODUCTION - During the consultant selection and negotiation
for contract it was determined that the consultant would
undertake Phase I of the study, which assesses the various space
needs and would at the end of that phase bring the results back
to the Council for consideration and discussion regarding the
studying of alternative site needs. Preliminary space
information was presented to the Council at a work session on
December 7, 1987. Further work has been done since that time
refining some of the information together with giving an estimate
of future space needs over the next 12 years.
DISCUSSION
Issue 1. Needs - The space study presents a space by space
layout plus a mass diagram showing the initial layouts
indicating spaces needed for the City should the
facilities be independent. The current needs are ov—
double the existing space. (The space study layouts c
not represent space arrangements only the type and size
of spaces.) It also illustrates expected expansion
space during the next 10-12 years. It is appropriate
that some of this space be built in as the ccst at this
point for some expansion needs is generally cheaper to
do initially than to add at a future date. As for other
expansion needs beyond these are addressed by making the
building expandable in the future. An estimate has also
been made of approximate site needs. (See Attachment B)
At this point cther entities that may be interested in
space have not been formally requested to submit
preliminary needs. If the City does go ahead with Phase
1
II and then decides to go forward to preliminary design,
it would be appropriate that these other agencies would
be formally approached to det -rmine their interest.
Issue 2. Site Analysis/Phase II Three Alternatives - Now that
the estimated space is known and rough site needs as
they relate to space is better understood, it _s
appropriate that the Council determine which, if any, of
the alternatives they would like studied. As noted in
Attachment B the amount of space may dictate which
alternatives are explored.
1. Present Site/All Facilities - In the space needs
the present site is extremely restrictive. Not only
relating to simply placing all needed space on the
site and trying to coordinate the phasing and
construction of one building before tearing down
another, such would probably not allow the City to
comply with its own zoning ordinances as they relate
to parking, setbacks and etc. The current site is
2.5 acres if 2 streets are closed off. Based on the
City Hall/Police developments in other cities of
similar space needs the range of acreage is 1 1/2-2
acres and an additional 3-5 acres for Public works.
To have sufficient space to adequately do the space
need on the present site with little or no buffering
may require purchase of up to 4-6 surrounding
properties and closing of two streets. This would
not allow for additional space for other entities
interested or expansion for the future.
Salvageability and remodeling of any of the
existing buildings given structural and other code
problems are not cost effective, as
remodeling/additions to bring to code could cost as
much, if not more, than a new building. It would
severely limit any future City expansion or joint
utilization of space with other agencies without
acquisition of more abutting property.
2. Split Site_ - The site in Crystal Bay could allow
for possible construction of City Hall and Police
facility, but Public Works most probably would need
to be placed on a separate site and certain building
savings of a total combined facility would not be
realized nor would the organizational advantages of
all facilities on one site. ($70-85,000 savings of
all on one site.) It would not free up the current
space for sale.
3. All Facilities -Alternative Site As for an
alternative site to be explored at this time, the
City has contacted the ownr- of the property
immediately west of the property the City owns on
the east side of Old Crystal Bay Road. The owner is
willing to further discuss this with the City
regarding this site. Between the City owned space,
that amounts to about 7 1/2 acres of dry land and
the Carpenter property approximately another 12
acres, the City would have the 10 to 15 acres for
its own needs together with allowing some expansion
either of its facility and/or addition of other
entities/agencies onto the site together with sale
of existing City property to recoup some of the
cost.
ALTERNATIVES -
Issue 1.
1. Accept the space information subject to revisions as
the process continues.
2. Acceptance including expansion needs or inclusion of
10 yei.r expected expansion in the plans.
3. Amend and accept.
4. Table for further information and/or discussion.
Issue 2. Alternatives
1. Study alternatives.
2. Select one of three alternatives for further study.
3. Table for further information and discussion.
RECOMMENDATION -
Issue 1. Review of Draft Space Needs - It is recommended that the
City accept the space study as presented with any
comments Council may have for future consideration as
the process goes along.
Issue 2. Site Study - It is recommended that the City explore
sites Alternatives 2 and 3 as Alternative 1 does not
appear to be feasible from a space needs standpoint.
Exploration of each alternative is $4,.i00.00.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the City
Council accept the space study -as presented by the consultant and
that it undertake studies of Alternatives 2 and 3 related to the
facilities and accept preliminary cost information based on
present and expected expansion needs over the next 10 years.
Ayes , Nays
cc: David Kroos, Boarman & Associates
z
"•'-.7
tr a x F
r 't.1 '�
?#% i/#j ¢I A
1F
_
��i , 12. l4 MY1:.'Jf. 1�L - f::l �.i
J
r
E ti G l N E B '� ii ty G
�NTE'�"IOI1 �ESIGti
'?'�:LY.>��w��F :�. ki.. J..f k�i_wl w'4!•_.a�att ,Z,..6 .�'�tr. fir. r::il� .1., �4<. ,.5.. r.�ti1. !. ie .. 1r. .. .,,
u
i
7
i
F�
i
i
I
k
CITY HALL
Rev1:2d 1/21/88
ORONO CITY HALL
--------------
I. General
* Reception/Waiting Area
* General Storage/Office :--oplies
* Vault/Archive Storage
* Council Chambers
* Meeting Room (12-14 Capacity)
* Meeting Room (5-7 Capacity)
* Toilets/Janitor's Closet
* Mechanical Room
+� Electrical/Telephone Room
+� Lunch Room (Capacity 8)
II. Administration
* City Administrator
* City Clerk
* Assistant City (lerk (4)
Reception Counter
* Files
III. Finance
* Finance Director
* Account Clerk
* Treasurer
4 Files
* Account Clerk (Future)
IV. Building and Zoning
* Director
* Building Inspectors (2)
* Assistant Zoning Administrator
* Fiche b Plan Layout Room
* Service Counter/Maps b Plans
* Files
* City Assessor (Fu=t, re)
V. Public Works
Public Works D;rector
* Recraation Coordinator (Future)
* Engineer Drafting Position (Future)
TOTAL NET SQ. FT.
+ 25% GROSS
PROJECTED
SQUARE FOOTAGE
225
240
165
1,404
228
150
300
216
80
225
3,233
220
120
748
368
1,456
150
104
104
32
104
494
260
198
169
232
99
58
99
1,115
130
120
99
349
6:4s7
1,661
08 S.F.
EXISTING
SQUARE FOOTAGE
0
79
675
866
83
1,703
122
50
136
32
340
134
48
60
40
282
113
119
266
50
52
8
130
GENERAL
Ydb
P i I(. : AMMIN G FORM pvmcc r _ t
4'+1 )AF.I AN & AW)OATE
?+x POW04 Cx+.3t ST. tXlNMCtSiilF NrZ .TyV
WW-A-CUS, WWOW-OVA SSW". (M?) 3311XM2
raP,MI .r
f �.JNf:11<_M! (�F Ai'' :rM.IRu:nA.A�sN
VT t:I r 1 IIIN %Pf
IVOOR AVFA RFtjUkkD
PITY;JCAI r FiA iLIPV"
_ rW-'CN [Iff IFF AREA
PANF 1 S `i S T F M
fN-t iCF up ROOM
fIVNI TLPF .MJfI FCI PWNT
CF:> L[1t.NNTiE_ CFIATRS
(I? END TAILE.
m Calf-F"U TARL.F.
SPECIAL Rr Q.NRFMENTS
_-... MT
_ P.C.
WALANT I "'44TIM
VI O f k h`h'! :ki.:N` . WALL
(J X11txi
FLMR WALLS
Alf : I ',I.
a 4 w alp a -V
F(lfiF-JA
KMA4 AZ4)OATE"i N--,-.3tnN tin
1-1 il I III-`) I -,q. t-vmmr4
nt.pri 111WPAL
14,
MNCTM OR AcrX"40DATION
APEA. REOUPED
X ill" W�i�40 10. FT,
r1p lf-p
MTN I ll'I'l(F AFrA FLOOR
PANEL :',Y':il-FM V AL LS
nFr if:[ LIP ROOM
I AlVi f (AlIPWNT
COMER
W(VV TABLE
MAIL W- A
WORK 10PAU:
TAFLFl
MAIL
fwF A
SVECiAl REWIREMMIS
CPT
P.1 -.
I P- k ARt.f.'
VA, AIV! I
WAIA
jr?
IT","'CH.A.MMING, FORM
HOA"M & AS�)CIATES
Xw'- "70,714 FWS1 S1. NO. .1124J_
Ail,'Xr., W**FW.A 5_54W. (617) 3N-3752
NAME -a
Pt.-F: T, U, WRAI.- :W11PAGE.
FMCWT-1 OR AC 061MODATION
VAllLT/ONlW,FHTVF_ lilnRINGE
11. OOR APFA REOIJIF,+D
IVA' \' SQ. FT.
(FT-N rIFF ILE AREA
PAW-1- ISY`,Tl.m
WFICF OP PnOH
R)PMTLlPF AW FOUPWN'T
'-.HE'L VlWi
r*T(:IAL REQUIREMENTS
CPT
P.c.
I, Flf R A RL r:
VAI ANf".'_ L 7614TINI
VIAliAl. PW—T.FN1.
(it A."Wo
FLBOR
WALL.'-',
KFIRE PRDnF
If #% !. j 1 i - I "o
1 r i a T` % ,: iL .ir i s► 1I1 "1 R
BOARMAN & ASSOCIATES 206 PMTH FIRST SCOMMISSION NOl
7.
MMEAPOLIS, Ii "AMOTA 55401. (612) 339-3752
NAMEt
DEPT, CITY HALL
FUNCTION OR ACCOMMODATK)N
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
FLOOR AREA REOURED
361-0' X W-O'= 1404 SOFT.
PHYSICAL FEATURES
OPEN OFFICE AREA
PANEL SYSTEM
-R- OFFICE OR ROOM
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT
MAYgR
(4) :MNTEIL TENDERS
CITY ADNKISTRATOR
CITY ATTORNEY
STAFFS RECORDER
ZONING AOM MSTRIITOR
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
SEATING FOR 48
SPECIAL REOURENENTs
CRT
P.C.
LOCKABLE
VALANCE LIGHTING
VISUAL PRESENT.WALL
GLAZING
FLC13R
WALL
PODILM
SrAI_F. IrP.' - 1'-0•
rwllrr_ rt
--A —J - _A __ar —�:
PROGRAMMING FORM
BOARNAN & ASSOCIATES
NG HORTH FIRST ST.
M WEAPOLIS, MIMlESOTA 35401. (612) 339-3752
CLIENT ORONO 1124.1
PROJECT SPACE PROGRAM
ROOM OR UNIT GENERAL
FUNC110N OR ACCOMMODATION
MEETING ROOM
CAPACITY 12-14
FLOOR AREA REQUIRED
12'-0" x 19'-0" = 228 S.F.
RELAIICINSHP
PHYSICAL FEATURES
FURNITURE AND EQUPM7=NT
(2) 42' X 72' PEDESTAL TABLE
(12) CHAIRS
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
PRESENTATION PALL V / SCREEN
PROGRAMMING FORM
BOARNAN k ASSOCIATES
206 NORM FIRST ST.
MMNNEWOIIS. M WNESOTA 55401. (612) 330-3752
...............................................................................
.......................................
...............................................................................
.......................................
...............................................................................
.......................................
...............................................................................
.... ..
.......:. ...
�.:...:
CLIENT ORONO 1124.1
PROJECT SPACE PROGRAMMING
ROOM OR UNIT GENERAL
FUNC71ON OR ACCOMMODATION
MEETING ROOM
CAPACITY 5-7
FLOOR AREA REQUIRED
13'-6" x 11'-0" = 150 S.F.
RELATIONSH'
PHYSICAL FEAPJRES
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT
3W x 721 TAKE
6 CONFERENCE CHAIRS
SPECIAL REQUREMENTS
V
CFPRO-33
ROGRAM�, ING--�OKM
CLIENT ORONO W4.1
BOARNAN k ASSOCIATES
206 NORTH FIRST ST. PROJECT SPACE PROMAM
M I NEAPOLLS. MINNESOTA 55401. (6121 339-3752
18 1- O~
ROOM OR UNIT GENERAL
FUNCTION OR ACCOM MOOATION
NEWS AND MONEW S TOILETS
(STAFF AND PUBLIC USE)
FLOOR AREA REWIRED 300 S.F.
RELATIONSHP
•
V PHYSICAL FEATURES
FURNITURE AND ECAAPMENT
NEN'S WONEN'S
T MLL - _'F3MS
2 URINALS 2 SINKS
1 SINK
i� SPECIAL REOIARENENTS
JAN. CLOSET
SHELVING
BOARMAN & ASSOCIATES
206 NORTH FIRST ST.
MMIEAPOUS, M'N00TA 55401. (612) 339-3752
D�Ra��la
ICOMMISSION NO. 1IPA
NAME
DEPT+ CIYY pj&
FUNCTION OR ACCOMMODATION
LUNCH ROM
FLOOR AREA REQUIRED
/6 Low x /V o M: t X. r S.F.
PHYSICAL FEATURES
OPEN OFFICE AREA
PANEL SYSTEM
-Jt- OFFICE OR REM
FURNITURE AND EOUIPMENT
CS ) CHAIRS
KITCHENETTE, SIN(, REFRIGERATOR,
S T OttAGE ROOMUPPER AND LOVER CABINETS
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
CRT
P.C.
LOCKABLE
VALANCE LIGHTING
VISL4IL PRESENT.WALL
GLAZING
PROGRAMMING FORM
BOARNAN & ASSOCIATES
206 NORTH nRSI ST.
►AMEA/CIM MMNESOTA 554M. (612) 331-3752
PRME T ORONO
COMISSIM NO. 11241
NAME#
DEPT- PUBLIC WORKS
FUNCTKJN OR ACCOMMODAMON
MECHANICAL EDUIPT1ENT RIM
FLOOR AREA REQUIRED
18'-0• X 12`-V=216 SO. FT.
PHYSICAL FEATURES
OPEN OFFICE AREA
PANEL SYSTEM
R OFFICE UP ROOM
FURNITURE AND EQU PMENT
MECHANICAL ERUIPTHENT
SPECIAL REWREWNTS
— CRT
P.C.
LOCKABLE
_ VALANCE LIGHTING
VISUAL PRESENT. WALL
GLAZING
FLOOR
VALLS
nPFPVR3
PROGRAMMING FORM
BOAWAN & ASSWATES
206 NORT*I nR!51 ST. {6t1j 33�-37s2
11�i�E.AOQIS. 1/MNEWTA '55401.
PMACT MOB
C13MMISSM N NO. 104.1
NAME,
DF:PT, PUBLIC WOWS
FUNCIM OR ACCOMMODATION
ELECTRICAL/ TELEPHONE R13014
FLOOR AREA REQUIRED
B'-V X 10`-O'=80 SQ.FT.
PHYSICAL FEATURES
OPEN OFFICE AREA
_ PANEL SYSTEM
R OFFICE OR ROOM
FIJRN7LW AND ECILIINMENT
FLOOR
VALLS
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
CRT
P.C.
r LOCKABLE
VALANCE LIGHTING
VISUAL PRESENT. VALL
GLAZING
❑F•FPWR2
C
c
G
c
a
10
C
r�
r�
Yr
ft-
AD STAATION
BOARMAN Oc ASSOCIATES
206 NOR/H FRST ST.
WOK01POUS, W#*50TA SUM. (512) 339-3752
VALF; 1/4' = V-9#
■
CQMSSION N1 L 124.1
UAW' MAiiC DERNHARDSM
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FUNCTION OR A=MMODATION
FLOOR AREA REOMM
20'-0' X I I'-O'=22A Sa FT.
PHYSICAL FEATURES
OPEN OFFICE AREA
PANEL SYSTEM
OFFICE 13R ROOM
FURN"URE AND EQUIPMENT
FLOOR
WALLS
DESK 30• X 660
RETURN 24' X 66'
T A1LE 24' X "'
(2) 3(rW. 4-DRIIVER LATERAL FILES W/LOCKS
42' ROUND TARE
(3) GEST CHARS
DESK CHAIR
SPECIAL REEtX1IREVE14ITS
X CRT ■TADWILE SURFACES
P.C.
I ry'v,41EE
VALANCE LIGHTING
VISUAL PRESENT. WALL
— GLAZING
nW'Fr_AM
+ i r
BOARMANA & ASSOCIATES
2" Mom 1167 ST.
m"aApoM Y m*30TA SSW. (612) 339-3752
V
m
z
—4
'^
o
1
0
COMMISSION Ma 1224.1
NAMEoDORTHY HALLIN
DEPTs CITY CLERK AWlNWVftN
FUNCTION OR ACCOMMODATION
(/Ky GI.ipl-%
FLOOR AREA REQUIRED
/O� O' if /Z c O~ _ .1"
PHYSICAL FEATURES
OPEN OFFICE AREA
VC PANEL SYSTEM
OFFICE OR RMN
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT
DESK 30' X 66'
RETURN 24' X 48'
PRINTER TABLE 24' X 60'
TYPING TABLE 24' X 48'
DESK CHAIR
(l) GUEST CHAIR
OVERHEAD SFELVING
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
x RT
_ P.C.
LOCKAIIL E
_ VALANCE LIGHTING
— VISUAL PRESENT. WALL
FLOOR
WALLS
PROGRAMMING FORM
BOA.RMAN do ASSWATES
206 RMTH FIRST ST.
MMEAKLIS, ONNESOTA 55401. (612) 332-3752
Er-e
TYPE
z R
TYPE
I
r �
r
I.
�r
TYPE
RI'1CA�
r �
r RAPio
PROJECT GROblO
COMMISSION NO, 1241
NAME. PATTI PETERS7N, TERI NAABS, JAMIE BOSMA
DEPT, CITY CLERKS:ADMINISTRATI(IN
FUNCTM OR AOCOMMODAT1ON
INFORMATION COUNTER
FLOOR AREA REQURED
zZ10 x 34'-o - 746 s•f
PHYSICAL FEATURES
OPEN OFFICE AREA
FLOOR
PANEL SYSTEM
WALL
OFFICE OR ROOM
FURNTURE AM EQLIPMENT
(5) 30' X 72' W132K SURFACES
Q) RADIO STATION
(3) 24' X 48' RETURNS
(1) SWIX14 is 37ArIQ4
(2) 24' X 72' TABLES
m CHAIRS
(1) Pf"IT clarr>aR TE/F,
(1) IZ X 24'V.LItW TABLE
CASH REGISTERS
FICHE
PRINTERS
SKC3AL REQUIREMENTS
3_ CRT
(t) PtnwmCSAC..
P.C.
_
LOCKABLE
_+
VALANCE LIGHTING)
--_
VIStML PRESENTAxIAL-L
GLAZING
_-------_---__
DPF�rF!
FORM
j mf lf* I
io)rPMAN k At7,'t-JXJATEl—, lit' 1
."fW" ^l jj_
IV%=
on
ll..fNf'UrR,l
0 Lo
I k OOR APF A R.F-i)UIPFD
i'40 �& 'A' 150'-3613 SO. FT,
r'l ly, �;j t: I `J_LALjjJPk_.�.
.X- WFN WFICT AREA
PANVI_ SY"TFM
rwriru tip Ron"
R)P4TW.l AWj VOUPWNT
(5) FIRE VILES
(1) f.f3NTRA(-'T VILE
(2% MPINAWT_ FILF:"b
(1) MISC. VILE
(2) CITY ri-EPK FILES
(1) VnTE'R REGISTRATION
(1) (-ITY COMIL. MINI TES
(1) Pt_ v%WT"j COMMISSION
SPEC IAl Rr(,xMREMFNTS
CPT
L D I. ABI J
VA1,ANl,'l I ll.,HTTN(,
VV�LJAI. 1,!'l N 1. \.P10 I
ft A/ I N I i
FLUOR
WALLS
,1' I 1 1 1 . I
J
WARMAN & ASSOCIATES
206 MOM FVMT St
WOMAPOLIS. Ii f*30TA 55401_ (612) 339-3752
1 f' i" s i/ t 7`
' COMMISSION Na 11241
NAME' TOM KLEHN
DEPT' FINANCE
FUNCTION OR ACCOMMODATION
FINANCE DIRECTOR
FLOOR AREA REQUIRED
PHYSICAL FEATURES
OPEN OFFICE AREA
PANEL SYSTEM
-j3- OFFICE OR ROOM
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT
FLOOR
WALLS
(U DESK 30' X 66'
(U RETURN 24" X 4W
m
(2) 4-DRAVER LATERAL FILES
(L) DESK CHAIR
(2) GUEST CHAIRS
OVERHEAD VING
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
X CRT �RIMMr[-N� N
/S
P.C.
_ LOCKABLE
VALANCE LIGHTING
VISUAL PRESENT. WALL
GLAZING
nprF,"
BOARMAN t ASSOCIATES coMMlssloN Na i1Z41
206 NOFM FVMT cT
MMEAPOLI% 1Nr 4MOTA 55401. (612) 339-3752
NAME, ROBIN HIKELSON
DEPT, FINANCE
FUNCTION OR ACCOMMWATION -
f INAMLC ALLat,INT C�
FLOOR
U R AREA REQUIRED
Aw 4 M
PHYSICAL FEATIJRES
OPEN ffFICE AREA FLOOR
JL PANEL SYSTEM WALLS
OFFICE OR RMIJI
FURNRURE ANO EQUIPMENT
DESK 30' X 60'
LATERAL FILES (3)
CHAIR
OVERHEAD SHELVING
MWv t9u rX*
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
X CRT
P.C.
LOCKAIILE
VALANCE LIGHTING
VISUAL PRESENT. WALL
GLAZING
BOARMAN do ASSOCIATES
206 NOWH FVtST ST.
MNiEAPOUS. MM*90TA 55401. (612) 339--3752
ICOMMISSION Na 1124.1
NAME, CHARLOTTE KNUTSON
DEPT, FIN 4- CE � 1 ,{yf *myw
FUNCTK)1 OR ACCOMMOOAUM
fiNma- Au-aUNf Aim
FLOOR AREA R QUIREO
,is x G�I�D �1 i
PHYSICAL FEATURES
OPEN OFFICE AREA
PANEL SYSTEM
OFFtCE OR ROOM
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT
DESK 30' X 60'
LATERAL FILES 0)
OVERHEAD SHELVING
cT R7t w17RK`fil U AN 'Elexua
SPECIAL RECUEtEMENTS
X CRT
P.C.
LOCKAIlLE
VALANCE LIGHTING
VISUAL PRESENT. WALL
_. GLAZING
FLOOR
WALLS
r ! f
BOARMAN k ASSOCIATES
X* NORTH FIRST ST.
64 NEAPOUS. W#*30TA 55401. (6121 339-3752
min
COMMISSION NO.
NAME,
DEPT, FINANCE
FUNCTION OR ACCOMMODATION
GENERAL FILING
FLOOR AREA REQUIRED
ins-F,• X 7-0'=32 SO. FT.
PHYSICAL FEATURES
—. OPEN OFFICE AREA
PANEL $Y S '7tM
OFFICE OR AITIN
FURNI'TURE AND EQUIPMENT
FLOOR
WALLS
(6) 4-DRAWER LATERAL FIRE FILES
SPECIAL REQ IREIAENTS
CRT
P.C.
X LOCKAIEE
VALANCE LIGHTING
VISUAL PRESENT. WALL
GLAZING
SCALE, 1/4' -- V-0'
OPF'FG1
BOARMAN & ASSOCIATES
2os mom nRsT ST.
MMEAPOI.S. M"0130TA 5540. (612) 339-3752
tjP
NO
COMMISSION ma 1124.
NAME, FVTM
DEPT, FINANCE
FUNCTION OR ACCOMMODATION .
FLOOR AREA REQUIRED
PHYSICAL FEATURES
OPEN OFFICE AREA
X PANEL SYSTEM
OFFICE OR ROOM
FURNrTURE AND EQUIPMENT
DESK 30' X SW
LATERAL FILES (_)
CHAIR
OVERHEELVING
AD
f-MAN tI'X4Z*
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
X CRT
P.C.
LOCKAIIL E
VALANCE LIGHTING
VISUAL PRESENT. `.:ALL
GLAZING
FLOOR
WALLS
C
F
C
P
68
r
40
p
L
IRUND
f3ill�Kt4.A"i 14 A`f�AiF.S
No; w.�<f►� I �F*" t ;T. CL wi-c.-`.:1iN NO. 111241 _
MMW Mh n t .. 'k*W- O r0TA 94M. (612) 334 375:?
NAME:�,'F A.r•1r1E Nk1fi1JSTFi
tit PT! F.1111_ nitN; FSND 7MINr-)
lJN1'TiQN QR ACCOMMMATKIN
'PlAu op,
FlOeiR kl:i:A kFCA)PF )
;'o - n• X 11'. V_21h0 W. FT.
P4'i':1S:At_ f F AMPFS
npFr-4 LIEF ICL AREA
I)F FTCF LIR REM
FIIRNITURF AND E OUIPMENT
DESK ;30' X 66'
CHAIR
(4) UIEST CHAIRS
42' RLANdD TABLE:
(2) 36'W. 4—DRAVER. LATERAL F-ILF
RE T t _N+J 24' X i R'
OVF-PHEAD SHELVING
9:PEf:tAL f'f_QINREMENTS
CRT
f. UCKABLIE -- -- - -
-
F`f-;r)i'i WINrl
NI )WMAN k A SSIMA n.S 1224.1
01WI ..Tf1N NG. _
mww A - w I r a rurrr.� cITA yarn. (#ji?) 3.q--'-rs7
NAMI-: U-M .11W'IIR:3 iNJD l Y I f. HMAN
ro i -P -, AND ZUN IN[,
FI1Nr'A4"NJ OR Af; ;i MO0ATKXJ
�I�I.DlN�� IN�C�IifDah
FL KI , APd A RECIINEC)
W-V X lfTlr=fWSQ. FT.
PHYSK'AL Ff_.kll.IPES
— ❑PFN nFF FCC ARF=A FLIM
PAWL_ CYST N VAf LS _
tIFFIu nF' Rnum
FURNITURE .AND f-DU}P'QAENT
DESK 30' X E.6'
TABLE 3tY X 66"
C HAI R
GUF_S f CHAIR
❑VERNEAD SHEL1411IG
36`V. 4- DRAVF-R L t , T F= RAL FILE V 1I .W. K
SPEOAL REQt.NREMENTS
CPT
_. _ I_f11;h:At11_f
_ VAl_ANI'L I..IGHTING
Fint..RMAN & ASSOCIATES +.I +IM1i°,`'T[11V NCI. 1124.1
bNM11F.l+t�d I,;. QN --f1TA 519401. (612) mo-. 3M.)
N,AMF-! Mir-fN Al_- C-F'AFFRUN
BIKLI 111NIa AND T NTW-i
1-11M.TION 0R .A+;::OMMOOATION
A (If- ZONING AVMlN0W0V-%
1 ' . +Y X 13' -I)' -1.4 n :IQ. FT.
I'HY`1I!'Al- FFATURLS
fIPEN nrrcrr AREA
X PANEL SYS1 rM
fit -FTC[ t]R Pollm
FURNITURE ANT) EMIPMENT
FLIM .-----------------
VALL ; ---------------
DESK. 3WX66•
LAYOUT T►NB LE A')"'
CHAIR (.2) GUEST CHAIRS
(?) 30 W 4-DRAWER LATERAL FIFE FILETS
[I M-CAD SHELVING
SPECIAL REWREMENTS
— CRT
I nf:r�Rt.f-:
VAI, MGE I I.GHTINr
! I i . i a
BOARMAN t ASSOCIATES
206 MOM FWST ST.
MMMEAP0M WOMOTA 5S401. (812) 330-3M
COMMSSION Na 11241
NAME•i !j RAN LAIM4T PAt _-
DEPT, DULDSIG AND ZMMMG
FUNCTION OR ACCOMMOE
flUusl ` f M bfw..A&
FLOOR AREA REQMED
14'-W X W-0'• 232 SOFT.
PHYSICAL FEATURES
OPEN OFFICE AREA
X PANEL SYSTEN
O"FICE OR RMN
FURNf1URE AND EQUIPMENT
(2) WORK SURFACES 9' X 36'V.
t WORK SURFACE 49' X 36'
(� rr"Is =ATIGW
o LIWT lAftf-
22' OVERFEAD SHELVING
tU CWUR
SPECIAL REJaJIREMENTS
X CRT
P.C.
LOCKAXE
VALANCE LIGHTING
VISUAL PRESENT. WALL
GLAZING
FLOOR
WALLS
OPFBP4
B ARMAN & ASSOCIATES lw low
206 NORTH FIRST ST.
MINNEAPOLIS. MI NESOTA 55401. (612) 334-3752
I COMMISSION NO. 11Z41 _
NAME- , IWKE aXeM/ RAMS
DEPT, BUILDING AND ZONING
FUNCTION OR ACCOMMODATION
flur`us, 0-M 6f,di ek , M of kxx,,
FLOOR AREA REQUIRED
aco it 9c o = 41 S.P.
PHYSICAL FEATURES
OPEN OFFICE AREA
X PANEL SYSTEM
OFFICE OR ROOM
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT
(1) MAP RACK
(2) PLAN RACICS
(6) 3". LATERAL FILING
SPECIAL REWREMENTS
CRT
P.C.
_ LOCKA'LE
VALANCE LIGHTING.
_ VISUAL PRESENT.
GLAZING
FLOOR
WALLS
0 1/4' = V
OPF BP4
BOARMAN & ASSOCIATES
MNMIEAPOUS, MMESOTA 55401. (812) 339-3752
10'-6'
0 � 0 b- lb4bqlq 0 b- qkbqlq � wI
COMMISSION Na U24.1
NAME, GENERAL FILING
DEPTi )ULIDE AND ZONING
FUNCTION OR ACCOMMODATION
*Ad2 , AUN(
FLOOR AREA REQUIRED
10'-6' X 5'-W-M SO. FT.
PHYSICAL FEATURES
X OPEN OFFICE AREA
_ PANEL SYSTEM
_ OFFICE OR FMN
FURNrlURE AND EQUIPMENT
SPECIAL REAUREMENTS
CRT
P.C.
LOCKA31LE
VALANCE LIGHTING
_ VISUAL PRESENT. WALL
FLOOR
WALLS
CrAI F, 1/4' = V-n'
_ GLAZING
OPF P r_,
-� ---� —1 --� ---i -�1 --� '- --ii :� � +� —�r"► Tom----+ I�-� D—s �—.. �— !— . �--
PROGRAMMING FORM PRQECT ORMO
GOARMAN & ASSOCIATES COMUSSION MC. 17241
2( NORN FRST ST
MINWAPOUS. IAW ESOTA 56401. (412) 330'-37W
NANj FUTURE
DEPT, BUILI)ING AND ZOMM
FUNCTION OR AOO"INOOATION
r_ITY
4ssles3O�
FLOOR AREA REOURED
11'-0' X f to s 99 s r
PHYSIC& FEATURES
— OPEN OFFICE AREA
X PANEL SYSTEM
— OFFICE OR RMM
FURNITURE AND EQUPUENT
FLOOR
VALLS
DESK 30' X 66'
TABLE XY X 66'
CHAIR
GUEST CHAIR
OVERHEAD SHELVING
36'V. 4-DRAVER LATERAL FILE V /UICK
SPECIAL REGUREMENTS
_ CRT
— LOCKABLE
—VALANCE LIGHTING
VISUAL PRESENT. WALL
— GLAZING
0' _ OPFRPI
I.
kw
r
c
c
c
C.
c
NM
...
BOARMAN & ASSOCIATES C0�lHSSION Na 11241
206 MKIH FMT St
MNKAPOUS. MMMTA SSW. (612) 3311`-3752
MANE$ JOHN GEIRIA ts[IN
DEPTo PUBLIC WINS
flaid *A; 64�4-lf 1 -0 11 Ft 14 ;-r-r, I & 11.9
FLOOR AREA REQUIRED
13'-O' X 10'-0'=130 SO. FT.
PHYSICAL FEATURESi
_ OPEN OFFICE AREA
_ PANEL SYSTEN
0 OFFICE OR RO ON
FLOOR
WALLS
FURNIIURE AND EQUIPMENT
DESK 30' X W
RETURN 24' X 4W
TABLE 30' X 66'
MAP flux
M 36'V. 4-DRAVER LATERAL FILES
M GLEST CHAIRS
CRVR
OVERKAD SHELVDG
SPECIAL REMIREMENTS
X CRT
_.._ P.C.
LOCKAIILE
VALANCE LIGHTING
_ VISUAL PRESENT. WALL
_ GL.AZIM
41
SCALE: 1/4' = I'-0'
OPFPQ
do y
BOARMAN & ASSOCIATES 1224.1
206 MONTH FRs1 St COMMISSION NEL
MMEAPOUS. MMESOTA 55401. (612) 339-3752
v
�v
z
4
�o
rn
O
NAME) FUT�
DEPT, FUSUC woman
FUNCTION OR ACCOMMODATION
1�-41'ION coomM Alm
FLOOR AREA REQUIRED
/0'1-O'X/tf-O": /AOSF.
PHYSICAL FEATURES
OPEN OFFICE AREA
?� PANEL SYSTEM
OFFICE OR ROOM
FURNnURE AND EQUIPMENT
DESK 30' X 66'
RETURN 24' X 48'
PRINTER TABLE 24' X 60'
TYPING TABLE 24' X 48'
DESK CHAIR
(U GUEST CHAIR
OVERHEAD SHELVING
SPECIAL REXIJREMENTS
X CRT
P.C.
_ LOCKAXE
_ VALANCE LIGHTING
VISUAL PRESENT. WALL
FLOOR
VALLS
PF.�s.;R;,sv,Mif v%j F'%-oi.M ' '
BOMMAN & ASSOCIATES
208 NOR1N FWW SL
M!MWAPOUS. 1/NMESOTA 56401. (412) 330-37W
u•-r
v�
FUTURE
j "r t T! y .T R z
PROJECT t
COIMISSION NO. 13241
MAKE, FUTURE
DEPT, FtAff.K., VjCJjCs
FUNCTION�ACCOMMODATION
FLOOR AREA REQUIRED
11--0' X 7'-0 o, "S.r
PHYSICAL FEATURES
OPEN OFFICE AREA
x PANEL SYSTEM
— OFFICE OR RCEtI
FLOUR
VALLS
FURNITURE AND Et?UPMENT
DESK 3V X 66'
TABLE 30' X 66"
CHAIR
OVERHEAD SHELVING
36'V. 4-DRAVER LATERAL FILE VA-OCK
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
_ CRT
P C.
_ LOCKABLE
_ VALANCE LIGHTING
VISUAL PRESENT. WALL
GLAZING
1 1/4' = 1'-e0
WIWI
I
ft
k4
wo
.w
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Revised 1/21/88
POLICE
Y I. Public Spaces
* Reception Seating
* Public Toilets (Shared a/City Hall)
II. Semi -Secured Areas
* Reception/Clerical
* Chief of Police
* Lieutenants (2)
* Squad Room/Roll Call Room
* Training Room/Meeting Room
* Conference Room
* Quiet Room
* Special Teams Room
* Archives/General Storage
* Men's Toilets and Lockers
* Women's Toilets and Lockers
* Equipment Storage
* Lunch Room (Capacity 4)
* Patrol Supervisor (Future)
* Detective (Future)
III. Secured Areas
PROPOSED
SMMRE FOOTAGE
100
863
230
244
356
400
196
127
96
160
276
133
1S0
160
13S
13S
* Sallyport/Garage (3 bays) 828
* Evidence Garage 268
* Evidence Processing 84
* Evidence Storage 180
* Booking 1S0
* Interrogation/Breathalizer Room 96
* Holding Rooms (2) 149
* Property Storage 300
TOTAL NET SQ. FT. S.91b
♦ 305 GROSS IP77S
TOTAL SO. FOOTAGE 7#691
EXISTING
SQUARE FOOTAGE
25
772
120
120
1S0
20
20
70
30
120 (Attic)
20
308
40
72
SO
2S
Z70
1.732
478
2.210
I v ) I H - I
1:1"Ci S DIN 'tat
YN'. tow tv f eiiT tl
WNW-SA)TA 554UI (02) 451 --'76-2
DEPT: Rl-crtltitm SEATING
FUNCII(N CIR ACCUMM00ATIKON
FL(,K)R AREA WQUWD
jo,-V X 10,1-0'z-:100 SO. FT.
PH'nCM. FFATMES
OPEN OFFICE AREA
PANEL. SYSTEM
Ul i'lCE OR RMIP
Flik"TUMAND FWIPMEWT
(4) UIL"X f-4WRIN,
(I',- LNI) TAIDLE
41F(A'Al W1 WRINUNTS
I.WT
I I L KINK I.
VA[ AN U L iui rm
wAu-
FLEW
WALI - S
v
PROGRAMMINt. FORM OROT
PROJECT
BOAR" & ASSOCIATES 1124J
206 NWIN FitS7 ST coMMlsstaN Ml ._..
J1N11� Woan TA S, 4M. (612) 3M-3712
NNE, SUE DODZIEN L CAROL HANSING
"Ti PILICE DEPART WNT. TUN COUNTER
FUMCIM OR AOCOMMOMATION
FLOOR AREA REQUIRED
34' -6' X 25'-0'=863 SO. FT.
PHIYS SAL FEA11URES
OPEN OFFICE AP.EA FLOOR
PANEL SYSTEM VALL
R_ DFF'ICE 13R ROOM
FURI4TURE A 40 EQU FhENT
(3) DESK 30" X 72'
(4) VORK TABLE 30' X 72'
<3) RETURN 24' X 4W
(6> CHAIRS
(6) 36'4. 4-DRAWER LATERAL FIRE FILES
C3) CRT S
(I) STATE CQR'UTER
<I) FTCHE
r IPDER
SHELVING/V%4K COUNTER
SPECIAL REOLAREbENTS
_i_ CRT
P.C.
LOCKABLE
VALANCE LIGHTING
VISUAL PRES-NT.WALL
GLAZING
OPFPDR6
F'Kt1JtC;1 uuunu
BOARMAN & AS' OCIATES COMMISSION NEL 1124J
� logWH nRST sY
IINMc WOLM MW4*SOTA 55401. (612) 330-3752
11'-6'
MAW, lELVIN KILBO
DEPT, A POLICE
FUNCTION OR ACCONMOOAmOd
FLOOR AREA REQUIRED
20'-0' X U'-6'-230 Sa FT.
PHYSICAL FEATURES
— OPEN OFFICE AREA
_ PA EL SYSTEM
O OFFICE OR ROOM
FURNMWE 4ND EQUPMENT
FLOOR
VALLS
DESK 36'
X 72'
RETURN 24' X Qr
CREDENZA
22' X 72'
M) 30"V.
4-DRAVER LATERAL FILES
DESK O SIR
42' RMAO
TABLE
(4) GUEST
CHAIRS
OVERHEAD
SHELVING
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
X CRT
P.C.
. A LOCKABLE
VALANCE LIGHTING
VISIAAL PRESENT. WALL
— GLAZING
• WTE HOARD
■ WO R MUST HAVE LOCK
■ FILES MUST HAVE LOCKS
OPFPD01
BOARMAN do ASSOCIATES
Z* NORIH nRST ST.
M MIEAPOUS. W**30TA 55401. (612) 339-3752
•
COMMISSION NOI. 1124.1
NAME, Ems! AND GARY CHESW ICK
DEPT, CPARTIENTs LIEUTENANT
FUNCTION OR ACCDMMOOATKIN
FLOOR AREA REQUIRED
16'-3' X 15'—W=244 SO. FT.
PH YSSICAL FEATURES
OPEN OFFICE AREA
)#C PANEL SYSTEN
_— OFFICE OR RCOl1
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT
FLOOR
WALLS
(2) DESKS 30' X 66'
(2) RETURNS 24' X 49'
(2) CHAIRS
(4) GUEST CHAIRS
(2) 4—BRAVER LATERAL FILES W/LOCKS
■ WWWV PANEL TO DE USED TO ACCOMODATE
SHARED CRT BETVEEN STATIONS
(1) QrW. OVERHEAD SHELVING
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
_ CRT
_ P.C.
_ LOCKABLE
_ VALANCE LIGHTING
_ VISUAL PRESENT. WALL
_ GLAZING
MTACKABLE SURFACE
aSHAREB CRT AND
TYPEWRITER
OPFPLPI
SC AlE , 1/ 4' — 1'-_Q' _
r it
PROGRAMMING FORM
BOARMAN & AS`WATES
206 NW7H FIRST ST.
M"CAPQIS, MINNESOTA 55401. (612) 334-5792
ti
Id
A
I' � 4moW Li
111ADRIC
M A-
c']
PR(XECT O>Rt O PCILICE W"-!TMENT
COIMIS SIM NO L 1124 J
NAME,
DEPT, POLICE DEPARTMENTe 7/ROLL CALL RO N
FUNCTION OR AOCOI+MMODATION
FLOOR AREA REQURED
19'—V X 16'—O'=304 SO. FT.
PHYSICAL FEATURES
---_ 13PEN OIFFICE AREA FLMR
PANEL SYSTEM WALLS
— OFFICE OR ROOM
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT
(6) 300 X 48' VO1RK CARRELS
(5) 36'V. 4—DRAVER LATERAL FILE W/LOCKS
(6> CHAIR
CLOSET
WORK COUNTER
TYPEWRITER
SPECIAL. REWREWNTS
CRT
P.C.
LOCKABLE
VALANCF_ LIGHTING
VISUAL PRESENT. WALL
GLAZINF3 _
OPFPGf 9
I 1
BOARMAN k ASSOCIATES
206 NORTH FIRST ST.
MMEAPOUS. k0IMMOTA 55401. (612) 339-3752
COMMISSION Na 1124.1
NAME,
DEPT, POLICE DEPARTMENT& CCRIFERENCE/TRADdiNG ROOM
FUNCTION OR ACCOMMOOATION
DIVISIDLE CONFERENCE ROOMS/TRAINING RMN
TWiD w9w"s 'S kj A: Ohm
FLOOR AREA REQUIRED
24'-0' X 2O1'-W=4 0 SO, FT.
PH YSICAL FEATURES
OPEN OFFICE AREA
PANEL SYSTEM
R OFFICE OR ROOy
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT
WALL
(8) TABLES 24' X 60' WITH FOLDING LEGS
(1.w CHAIRS
PRESENTATION 8001RD
MOVABLE PARTITMN
SPECIAL REGUREMENTS
CRT
P.C.
LODKAB E
VALANCE L IGHT W5
VISUAL PRESENT.VALL
GLAZING
PRSENTATION KIARD
SCALEN l/B' = 1'-0'
OPFPDC3
rvu-!tvg-lp ADM av zoo a--
i'F�{:I:.:F�%�..r�iA.1if�ii; � �:f�.'i,�i - -- - � I•h�1�.R:+.� ;�.`IIt1I1 _.. ..__ __. ._ .. ... _ ... ___ ___
w.. Nwnl tv: t sF. r.uMlfti illN FN7, 1l�'d l
60WAP(11'::,
NAMIE
WPT-1 Pill 1CL DI-PARTMENTi INFERENCE RDD4
FUNCTION OR -AMOrM ODAT10N
F104R AREA F(EI)UIRED
14' -U' X 11 `-0`=196 SG. FT.
PHYSICAL FEATURES
-- OPEN (FT ICE AREA FLUOR _ __—
___ PANEL SYSTEM WALLS
W FICE UR RO0M
FURNTURE .AND F(AIP►ENT
(6'% CHAIRS
Q 60r k[1 D CW LRF-NCE TABLE
(I) PRLSUN fA`I HIM GUARD
SPECIAL REQUIREbE.NTS
CPT
_ LFM:KAHI.E:
_ VAt-N4 F L1LiANNG
1-14.';L-NI. WALL
U AT1Nl,
WARMAN & ASSOCIATES
C .on IC hmLm vnTi SLB1 16191 330-37S2
I ,
COMlISSION Na 1124.1
NAME,
DEPTo POLICE DEPARTMENT, RODS
FUNCTION OR ACCOMMWA710N
<7
FLOOR AREA REQURED
11'-6• X Il'-V-127 SOL FT.
PHYSICAL FEATURES
_ OPEN OFFICE AREA
_. PANEL SYSTEM
R ffFICE OR ROON
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT
42' ROUND TAI L.E
(4) CHAIRS
SPECIAL REOLA EMENTS
CRT
_ P.C.
LOCKAGE
VALANCE LIGHTING
VISUAL PRESENT. WALL
_ GLAZING
FLOOR
V AL.LS
a MARKER BOARD
OPF PDC2
SCALE, 1/4' - I'-0' -
IIRONO
o 1, ,i MitiN Ar ,IICIA]1.5 � C[llMlt:'ss" NLl..)tlada
"Ot 144V III 1 �I;"_. 1 T --
AAIHfNAI411%. WNNE:�FA 9_.401_ (612) 339—:57:�:'
12'-w
__ __j
w,Mt,
FOL ICE DUF'ARTlENT
FIJNC TIOPI OR ACCOMMODA71ON
SPECIAL TEAMS REM
FLOOR AREA REG(ARED
12'-0' X 8`--V=9G SO. FT.
PHYSICAL FEATURES
OPEN OFFICE AREA
_ PAWA_ SYSTEM
R Elf -FILE OR ROOM
FL" VINYL TILE
WALLS GYPSUM AUNU
FIJRMTL)" AND EUUP1iENT
(6i UDDIPTMLNT LOCKERS 24 W. X Ur&
(D WEAPONS LOCKER 48V. X 24'D. X 60'K
oI'ECJAI REIAARE.MLN15
P.1:.-
LUC 9 AHL L
VALANCL IlUi(1NU
1- H -M V . WALL
(d _AI_ (NI i--------- - - --
oNi rnF�w
1'l;A+JWARl & I:C1MMIi'iI1.Mi hill, lli`�1.1
nAiPIfdFAKUS, WNNE`,0TA 55401. 612) 339-3700
NlWE
DI141LICE DUPARTMENT, ARF:HIYEfGEtJE�>Al T IIFiF�I,F=
I IJNC IK td OR ACCOMMODATION
J
ILAOR AREA FtE.WRED
16' -W X 10'-0"=160 SO. FT.
PI-MArAL FFATURES
OPEN f1FFICE AREA FLOW
PANEI. SYSTEM---._-.--
- -- CIFF 111 OR ROOM
FUkNtT )Rt- AM LQUPWNT
t4i P41D. SIIk1_)ti'1NG UNITS
.41C:IJII_ F2V4)lNl-A•f:Nf5
l.fM'i:nFl..t_
A].: W:I. 1 ad i I IIG
VhIJAL NI'1 %,I.NT. HALL
_ Cm1. AlINl; - - - - - -
fit'I t'Ik
BOMMAN & AMCIATES I COMMISSION Na 1134.1 I
206 NNIN FXtST b L
k"EAPOM YNIE"'' ie.". re.w� •�.. sx+
r-
NAME)
DEPTH OCKER ROQI
(FUNCTINON OR ACCOMNOOATION
FLOOR AREA REQURED
IOL60 x It)-&: X76 ter?
FYH YSICAL hAh#tS - V
_ OPEN OFFICE AREA
_ PANEL SYSTEM
R OFFICE OR ROOM
FURNCIURE AND EQUIPMENT
(:6) LOCKERS 18" X Ur
(2)
SHOWER STALL
(1)
TOILET
(1)
SINK
(1)
URMNAL
SPECIAL REQUREIIENTS
_ CRT
P.C.
_ LOCKABLE
_ VALANCE LIGHTING
VISUAL PRESENT. VALL
GLAZING
FLOOR
WALLS
[pFPDRII
f i
80ARMAN & ASSOCIATES
206 NORTH FRSI ST.
low"APOl1S. mww 55W. (612) 339-3752
Ir
COMMISSION NO. 1124.1
NAME)
DEPTH S LI13(ER ROOM
FUNCTION OR ACCaMMODATKMI
FLOOR AREA REGMED
14'-0' X 9'-6•=333 SO. FT.
PHYSICAL FEATU4ES
OPEN OFFICE AREA
PANEL SYSTEM
OFFICE OR ROON
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT
(4) LOO(ERS
(U SHOWER
(1) SINK
(v TOILET
SPECIAL RIMUREMENITS
CRT
P.C.
LOCKAI-E
VALANCE LIGHTING
VISUAL PRESENT. WALL
GLAZING
FLOOR
WALLS
SCALE, 1/4• - 1'-0' OPFPDR4
BOARMAN & ASSOCIATES COMMISSION NOL UPA 1
206 NWIN i11t5T ST.
MpMEApOM mmCg0TA 3Wi. (612) 339-3752
O
t
NAME,
DEPTo po_ce A00'
FUNCTION OR ACCOIAMODATKON
LUNCH RODi
FLOOR AREA REQUIRED
sort
PHYSICAL FEATURES
OPEN OFFICE AREA
PANEL SYSTEM
_JL-. OFFICE OR ROM
�o-_-aLvA INU
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT
(4 ) CHAIRS
KITCHENETTE, SW REFRIGERATOR
UPPER AND LOVER CABDETS
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
CRT
P.C.
LOCKABLE
VALANCE LIGHTING
VISUAL PRESENT.IIALL
GLAZING
I -Al E: l/f3'
OPF P VRI 0
'()ARMAN k ASSOCIATES
Od od c*TM nFtS T ST
,114 EAPCAM MMESO A 55410. �612) 339-3752
► - t ; AT -
pKWLI:I WA -AND
C COMwi S S ION NO. 1L241
NAMES FUTURE
DEFT, ap"m
P ir; CTION OR ACCOMMODA110N
P470M au
FLGOR AR,Ek REQUIRE �
AltoR 16 -G : / 5.. .
PwiSICAL FEATURES
._ OPEN OFFICE AREA
PANEL SYSTEM
0 OFFICE OR ROOM
.'FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT
DESK ?-S'' X 72'
RETLJN • - 7%4' X 48'
FLOOR
WALLS
CRE
22' X 7Z'
(1)
-DRAVER LATERAL FILE
DES*,
a) GUEST
CHAIRS
OVERHEAD
SHELVING
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
X CRT
P.C.
X LOCKABLE
_ VALANCE LIGHTING
VISLOAL PRESENT. WALL
_. GLAZING
,
DmR MUST HAVE LOCK
FILES MUST HAVE LOCKS
OPFPDOI
Q
() ARI;AAN do ASSOCIATES
A > DATH FIRST ST.
iNNrAPCV% MWWSOTA � '-01. (612) :),z •3n2
/o:o"
CRT
FUTURE
F+KU.JLC I G LIND
(I CEINI a S S ION NO. 1124.1
NAME, FUTURE
DEPT& iwm
FUNCTION OR ACCOMMODAl1ON
PETEcTi m
FLOOR AREA jtEQUI=ED3S 3.r
PHYSICAL FEATURES
_ OPEN OFFICE AREA
PALL SYSTEM
O OFFICE OR ROOM
FLOOR
WALLS
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT
DESK 36' X 72'
RET• 24' X 48'
CRE A 22' X 72'
(I) .�- W. 4-DRAVER LATERAL FILE
DESK CHAIR
(2) GUEST CHAIRS
OVERHEAD SHELVING
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
X CRT
P.C.
X LOCKABLE
VALANCE LIGHTING
._. VISLIAL PR'ESENi. WALL
GLAZING
■ DOOR mLST HAVE LOCK
FILES HMT HAVE LOCKS
npcpnni
HDARMAN k ASSOCIATES
206 MOR1N FIRST SL
1AMEAPOUS. MME SOTA 55401. (612) 339-3752
COMMrOSSION Na 1124.1
NA
DEP'€. POLICE DEPARTMENT
FUN1110 N OR ACCOMMODATION
SAU-FPORT/ GARAGE
(3) BAYS
FLOM AREA REQUIRED
36'- W X 23'-W=GM SM FT.
PHY'SCAL FEATURES
OPEN O: FME AREA
_PANEL SYSTEN
. OFFICE OR ROON
FURI-MURE AND MAPMENT
FLOG? CONIC. (SCALE
WALL CONC. DLOCK
( W FILLED)
GUN LUXER
CAMM3IA EOUIPINENT ROUlGv-D S
aH MO R OPERATKI NS (REMOTE CONTROL)
SPECIAL REQUIMA NTS
CRT
. P.C.
.L. LOCKABLE (SECURITY TYPE)
VALANCE LIGHTING
. VISUAL PRESENT.WALL
GLAZING
FLOOR DRAINS
INERIEAD DE13M
(Io'-W x 10'-7)
_SCALE: j/W 1'-Q' OWPI
?I*C, N(-W Yr1 Flk`: I ``I
IM"cAVCIrs, WKWESOTA 55401. (612) 339 - 3/52
I
pt
Y
f
10
C n►ti:• I
Twu I a
_ ��occTcs_ I
r�l: 11JEl' T _ LIRUNLI . - - ----- — - - - - - - —_ - -
CnMMCS:ilC1N w] .1i24'1-_--
NAME&
DEPT-POLICE DEPARTF#NT
FLOM CIINC. (SfAI.F D)
WALE COW.. BLOCK
S R E LE .-
CHAIN LINKED DIVIDER
WALL.
FURN W RE AND EQUFPUENT
E V'IDFNI;F= STORAGE-1
: S I ORAGE CUBICLES
&24" X 124' SECURED CUBILCE
I-VILEM-F. PK-L:�SING
*\AlkK ('ULINTCR
*;INK
SPECIAL RF=6IlJIREk*--.N 15
- CWT F-LUIIk-LRAIN
_ P.C. 10'-0' X 10' li' ORDFIOR
_ 1AK'KARL F (; EC URITY TYPE) --- •----------- -•
VALAWE L_10NTING
_._ VISUAL PRESENT-WALL--__---
iit_AZING
ORF PDF;
FUNCTION OR AOCOM MODATION
EVIDENCE STORAGE
A. EVIDENCE GARAGE
B. EVIDENCE PROCESSING
C. EVIDENCE STORAGE
FL" AREA REQUIRED
23'-0' X 25'-0'=575 SOFT.
PHYSICAL FEATURES
OPEN EIFFICE AREA
PANEL. SYSTEM
OFFICE OR RmN
PROGRAMMING FORM
BC)A.RMAN & ASSOCIATES
1.06 NORTH FF.51 ST.
MROCAAOM MNNESOTA 554M. (612) 339-3?52
PR OXCT OIRONO
CQMMI:;SIOIN NO. 1124.1
NAME,
DEPT, POLICE DEPARTMENT
FUNCTION OR AOCOMMODATION
BOOKING
FLOOR AREA REQUIRED
W-a' X w-Or=1D S4 :T
PHYSICAL FEATURES
OPEN OFFICE AREA
PANEL SYSTEM
WFICE OR ROOM
FURNITURE AND ECOJ PMENT
WORK COUNTER
CAMERA H"T
STORAGE LOCKERS
FINGER PRINTING EQUIPTWENT
SPECIAL REQVIREMENT5
CRT
X LIXKABLE (SECURITY TYPE)
VALA14CE LIGHTING
VISUAL PRESENT. VALL
GLAZING
FL.OIM YIN YL TILE
VALLS LIB. ILOGK
(CORE FILLEW
f J
BoARMAN k AS50CIATES
2u6 NORTH FIRST ST.
WMEAPOLIS. M NMMTA 55401. (612) 339-3752
COMMISSION Na 1124.1
NAMES
DEPTi POLICE DEPARTMENT
FUNCTION OR ACCOMIMOOATION
INTEROGATION ROOK
FLOOR AREA REOURM
12'-0' X W-V=96 SO. FT.
PHYSICAL FEATURES
_.. OPEN OFFICE AREA
_ PANEL SYSTEN
_ OFFICE OR ROON
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT
WORK COUNTER
DREATHOLIZER EGU PT1ENT
(2), CHAIRS
(1) DESK 3V X 60'
SPECIAL RECUIREMENTS
_ CRT
— P.C.
_ LOCKAJLE
_ VALANCE LIGHTING
_ VISUAL PRESENT. WALL
_ GLAZING
FLOOR VINYL TD_E
WALLS CONC. BL=
SCALE, 1/4' - Y-0'
OPFPDRII
BOARMAN & ASSOCIATES IIZ4.1
2% NOR1H FIRST ST. COMMISSION NO.
MINNEAPOUS. MI NESOTA 55401. (612) 339-3752
NAME@
DEPT, POLICE DEPARTMENT
FUNCTION OR ACCOMMODATION
HOLDING RODM
FLOOR AREA REQUIRED
9'-0' X 16'-6'=149 SO. FT.
PHYSICAL FEATURES
- OPEN OFFICE AREA
_ PNfL SYSTEN
R OFFECE OR REDN
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT
(2) TOILETS
(2) I LXKS
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
- CRT
P.C.
LOCKA3LE
_ VALANCE LIGHTING
VISUAL PRESENT. VALL
_ GLAZENG
FLOOR
WALLS
SCALE, 1/4' = Y-O'
OPF P;
Revised 1/21/88
PROJECTED EXISTING
PUBLIC WORKS SM1ARE FOOTAGE SMLW FOOTAGE
I. Vehicle Areas
• Vehicle Storage
18#404
spool
• Vehicle Repair Says
IP900
600
• Mash Say
52S
---
II. Storage
• 6Nlk Materials Storage
10200
1.188
• Oil Slorage
100
75
• Paints i Chemicals
80
---
• Parts Storage
320
100
III.Shops
• Multi -Purpose Shop
540
---
• Sign Shop
540
540
• Meter Repair
100
---
• Paint Room
450
---
IV. General Areas
• Supervisor's Office (2)
240
118
• Supervisorts Office (Future)
120
96
• Lunch Room
322
192
• ►":GIs 4 Women's Toilets A Lockers
570
120
• kfthanical Equipsiont Rasa
216
--
• Electrical/Telephone Room
80
---
Net S.F.
121 Gross
Total S.F.
25,707
11.110
39084
1.658
28.791
12#768
V. Unhoated Storage
• Public Works 5.000 392
* Police (Property -Bikes, etc.)
• City Hall
.1
PUBLIC WORKS
PRQGRANA,ONU FORNA
BOARMAN h ASSOCIAJES IroN OR ACCOMMoDAnDN
2% NORTH F1RSI ST. i 'ICLZ�T%'A4F
MINNEAPOUS. MINNESOTA _5401. (&12 "s--3752
--� x 145`'-0 = 13 416 S.f
>r 9e=0 z 4,89e8 s.r
0 . .
IL \ IZ
I&
/t.
I�
/ II
/ II
ti
VEHICLE AP,,,�
4
u
y
�
�
I
to. l6. aiIIiII
II�1I
17/0. 9
C FUTUM9 NOW
RIM&
Or —
INSIDE HEATED STORAGE
PUBLIC WORKS STREETS & UTILITIE!
QUANTITY NO: cup With Piaws (6' x 221)
ierator Sets (1-45KVA; 1 30KVA) (7' x 151)
4 1. Single Axle Dump Truck (80-261) 2odder - Trailer Mount (4' x 60)
2 2. One Ton Dump Truck (8'-231 r/plol�up 4 Wheel Drive (5' x 181)
1 3. Road Grader (121 x 281) rD Sedan (51 x 181)
1 4. Front End Load (71-6" x 221) =am Cleaner - Trailer Mount (60 x 41)
1 S. Tractor boajder Backhoe (71-6" x : Roller (80 x 101)
1 6. John Deere Utility Tractor (70 x-oader - Proposed (51 x 10':
1 7. 112 Ton 4 Wheel Drive Pickup (61)er - Proposed (81 x 181)
EsOAk�/M�AN &p A'.�`JIJCIATES
706 TJfI I}i R J 1 J T.
Mr,MrEAPOLIS MMESUTA 554.1 ,612) 339-37152
i
I
COMMISSION NEL 1124.1
NAMEi
DEPT, PUBLEC WORKS
FUNCTION OR ACCOMMODATKA
VEHXL.E REPAIR DAYS
FLOOR AREA REGMED
50'—V X 38'—W=1900 SO. F- T .
PHYSICAL FEATURES
OPEN PFFICE AREA
PANEL SYSTEM
OFF ICE OR ROOM
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT
FLOOR HOIST
LUBRICATION SYSTEM
3 TON HOIST ON MAIL
WASTE OIL
WORK BENCHES
SF ECIAL REW IREMEN TS
C R T
P.C.
} LOCKABLE
VALANCE LIGHITNG
VISUAL PRESENT. WALL
_ GLAZING
L S%ALE� 1116' = i. +�• 'FPWR12
FLOOR CONC. SEALED
WALLS CONC. BLOCK
PAINTED
F------ - --- -- LLPTi P1JBI _lC vURK;;
RMCIKIN OR AOCOMMODATION
-1,4*k W
F100H AREA REQUIRED
/se -a X 36t _, =
F'HYSJCAL FEATURES
UPEN OFFICE AREA FLOM CLWkC I SE
PANEL SYSTEM WALL CUNCRE.fE
-Jk. _ OFF ICE OR ROM _I P61N TE D
I Ft.tF��'t�L1FtE AND EQUIPMLNT
y'
Hil :'KfF i'�Ukf WA .H LQUIPT
1 1i ti; 1 BIB
1
/ t
I I�
! r �
1.111:KArt I
_ L`Al_AW E t-lt,HTINCi
VL;t."t Mi.SENT-WALL
- - - - - _ . -- -- - - --- ----�- -- - -- - -.- GLAZING
t
T
U - (Z l), k..71 %. . i 1A , I Wl
1*JP. 7H F W -1 T S T.
fl cctimj-sjo�4 no.
NA►c:
DEPT- RMX 1N0443
FUNCTI(;t,o* OP. ACCOMMODATKA
AWLK I ?MCFAqr- i(MMXMINP-)
M47MAORL-5
FLOOR AJ-,lcA PEOUPED
PHYSICAL FEATURES
UPEW OFFICE kREA
PANEL. SYSTFM
OFFICE nR RM1
/50-0 jf aoto m /ZOO 3-F
FURNITURE AND EQU.1111MENT
SP-f-'(-.AAL REQUREMEN'r.-
r. P T
LUCKAFLE
VALMCE LIGHTING
\ASUAI. FRE�CHT. WAL-1-
i
FL [!OF
VAL
t'i,,�!i;F; �Fy9t�:41h�� : F � ►1�'PA W2CJ.ltc:F.Ilh:ur�ui_. _- - - _ _ .. - - - -
Ni1A MAN CUMMLSKIN NU
Z" "iH IV% I ST
waits. MOKSMA 5b401_ (612) ISV-spa?
— — --- _--- _ — ---- --� DLPT, PUBLIC VLIWS
-000
FLNCTKiN OR ACCOMM1ODATFO
a4t s7vmqe
FLOOR WE A RUXANED
,r-r x 1040%ftSo. FT.
PHYSIL'AL FEATURES
UPLN Ik FICE AREA
PANEL SYSTEM
R OFFICE. OR ROOM
FLOUR
PALLS
F l_*MTUKE AND LQUIPWN,
But k :TURAUF" ❑F IiREIASE AND LUBRICATION
PRUDULrS FOR LUBRICATION SYSTEM.
'�I'f �::IAI f1L1;�lNktME.Nf.�
L F: I
F.I .
L F1L K AL'lJ_
'v�►1_�Wi;L L1I,HTIPiI;
t 'KL l"A_N L WALL
UL AZINi,
LFF PURL.
s
FIR G"HAMMIrJc.: I
-
`i>� hKJlt i H I itS i 5f - - -
I�EIIPCY.15, INNNESDU 5_',�Ot. (612) .5.551-57t>2
tow I
DI:PT# PUBLIC WORKS
"C-IKIN OR ACXAI+ UVAIION
FAINT AND CHEMIChL STORAGE
ROOM ARLA WQU WD
W-0' X 10-0'=60 SIB. FT.
PHYSICAL FLA.TURE
OPEN UFF-IC:E AREA
PANLL_ SYSTEM
Ft Ot FILE OR ROOM
FL*M1LC-E .ANC EuUll'MLNT
`.bKC-IAL i:1:6Il,Nk',--M :NT5
_. CkI
_ Lt]ChAtil.E
WALAWX I. IfAM N6
_ VISM. PRESENT. WALL
F 1.001R C[IW K- I LI .A _ _LE D
VALLS LLWL tL lJ- ALLlfJL
PAINT - - - - --
t. DWRLSAED Fi.ihk :=If+B
VENTIL:iHM ftS I'I k l fIUL
l* -. 1- * T Z W_, T -r V-.
I k)t-;M fI llr�:i _...-
(Slj .'k A.`,.'ORAIL S I UMM [-I., MN Nil.
W,
?WVlH WS1 ' T_ —
m"4LAMQ N 111NME:.OTA 55401. (612)
wlw-..
11k.N1I PUM LC WORKS
fvNCTK1N OR ACCOMMODAnoN
Pi, T-S STORAGE
FLOOR WEA REQUWD
16 ` 0' a U' -0'= "i.'4 SQ. FT.
F'HYSIt:AL FLAIURE
--.-- LIVEN LIF F ICE WEA FLOdt� rr�'r�l l _j:E:�ll_Eli
VANIA SlS TEM WALL E:Ofy-RE ff Bl.k:-.
_E- UFF ICE UK ROOM _P.ATNI L11 _ ___
R.44M IM1 .A1,4D 1 QUIPW-NT
Mf IAL STUkMI,I J[if LVE:S
'd't�aal rlF1Jl_4F•:E:r11:N1'_i
I L1L K A Bl E
'VA[_ AtCl 11LH I INN
+.'ISUAI 1:*LSENT.WALL
- -_-LA"LNL
U11 f'WR8
e
E't�;{ tt �t�.+ P•;'it•:1ii'1 t ;� fit,,} rF Loi_i:I tMllNtl
2�ic• tuc>< nt ►t►t : t ,t CI)MM .34;' J NO. IL-,4. L__
NMV1+L=�'iY I`�, MINNE:,�TA 9:,�01. (612j :539-3?`J�
NNME.
�----------------- ----- ----- - ----_--------� I)L:F'T-, PUBLIC VD<2KS
FUNC-TKIN OR AOCOtMM/ODATION
MULTI --PURPOSE SHOP
FLUOR ARLA RE)?UFRED
30'—tY X 18'-0'=540 SQ. FT.
PHYSICAL FEATURES
_..__ OPEN OFFICE AREA
—_ PANEL SYSTEM
fie_ UFF-ICE OR kDDN
FLIDREDOCKEIE-SFALLD
WALL C'(]fJl f2F iF bt k-
P�TNj.�r, __--_--
FURNIIURE AND F(AJIPME.NT
Wf)kK- HE-.NCHCS
MISC. EQUIPIMENI-, ie, TABLL SAbS Elf—
:,F'Ei:b�l- I1L(JI�IkLbltNtS
L1:ILKAkL L
_ - VAI-"'I:- L IGH F INE
I
'VIlU.1L PRLSENT.WALL
-----------_��� ---- - -- - - -- GLAZING
i 1 s y w i : i 7 ■ 1 4
PROGRWMING FORM PRU.ECT ORONO
BGF,FMAN k�:�a'',0Cl^ ES COMMISSION ril 1124.1
206 NORTH FIRST Sl.
MlINEAPQIS, MMMMESOTA S5401. (612) 339-3752
NAME,
DEPT- PUBLIC WORKS
FUNCTION OR A0001Mr1ODATION
SIGN SHIP
FLOOR AREA REQUIRED
W-V x SOR-&4" SQ FT.
PHYSICAL FEATURES
OFLN OFF ICE AREA
PANEL SYSTEM
OFFICE OR ROOM
FURNI TLIRE ANO EWIPMENT
SIGN S'1$7P RACKS
LAYOUT COCN-4TER
SPECIAL RE QUIREMNIS
CRT
_-- P.C.
LOCKABLE
VALANCE LICHTING
VISUAL F'RESENT. 'VALL
GLAZING
FLOM
WALLS
CAI_t_ - 1 '4' °" - - -- --- - - -
CIPF P�1`a
M..-,..N & A )0 A I L'--1 COMMIS,�JCJN MI JIL14-1
2(x, NOR I I I F W� I I
MPO"P(XJ',,. WNW.0TA MAW. (612) l32—.!7b2
NAML
DE -Pit PUSI IC WORKS
fLPNClK)N OR ACCOMMODATION
$am Hwvm
fL" ARLA REWREL)
10"—iY X 10-0'=100 SO. FT.
PHYSICAL FEATURES
OPEN OFF ICE AREA
PANEL SYSTEM
IYFICE OR MOM
R*MiLM: V-41) LQUIPWNT
1 I I*
6J11NTl-* 111V
LX-"Pf k AND t.UWVR CABINETS
"ILI.L BIN IJNLI'.
L-FILKAMA.
'VAL./"-'r i-11-JAHNIJ
Vl-,0AI. F'fet-.:A.Ni. WALL
GL AZINU
FLOUR
WALLS
-A
PRI-69 I-AM11-V-3 F'(-' )R M 090NO
80i*.PMA' & Al-ScSt , iC,14TES
2ot, FIRST ST. I i:plt4!llISlSIl]N U0,
k,uNt*,APC,Llz;,
.............
...................
... . . . . . . . . .
....... .........
....... lost:
... ..... ...........
. .........
777
.......... ........
..........
..........
...........
.. .............
... ................. .............
NAMF:
f)EPT. R104jr. VIONC-5
FUNCT10N OR ACC,13M M CX3 ATKIN
RVNT Pca%
FLOOR AREA REGUCID W-0 Xe4rLO = JW S.T.
PHYWAL FEATURES
OPEN OFFICE kREA
PANEL- SYSTEM
OFFICE M ROOM
FURNOUIRE AND EQUPMENr
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
CRT
P.(-.
LD,'-'KAFLE
VALANt:E LIGHTING
VISUI.. PRESENT. WALL
GLAZIN15
— — --V
lot
I
f I_ i. j_ r- 11 1_
FORM
BCtrktJrN E: ASSWATES
.06 Nwrm FIRST ST.
L04NEAM6. UNNESOTA Z5401. (612) 339-3752
.... ... .. ...
...... .....:.:.:..... .: :. • :: :: li
.... ..
:� .... .. ...i...j...j...i .�. j. j. .�..
. .:.:.... ...... .......... ..............
........................................
............................ ..... ... .......... .. .... ..............
CLIENT ORONO I/$q
PROJECT SPACE PROGRAM
ROOM OR UNIT
FUNCTION OR ACCOMMODATION
MWit. Wat=S J&F9ZA#30ML
FLOW AREA REOUIRED
REL AI)ONSHIP
PHYSICAL FEATURES
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT
LAyoo T 7AEKE _W X 7Z
DESK CHAIR
(2) GUEST CHAIRS
OVERHEAZ,, STORAGE
PILES
ACNVT AACA-
SPECIAL REOUREMENTS
' LN F, 1/4'
P R O".) R A M N-A1 r-A-1 FOR -A
[,,(v RWA,N b. =:SU- KIATES
:Od NORTH f1RST ST.
LmNENPOIIS, WME`OTA :5*71. (612) 3N-3752
...............................................................................
.......................................
...............................................................................
.......................................
...............................................................................
.......................................
..............................................77
.......... .....................
cuENT 0#W"0 r/z4- r
PROJECT SPACE PROGRAM
ROOM OR UNIT
FUNCTION OR ACCOMMODATION
IVA" WOA= 3Up �t�ISaL
FLOOR# AREA REQUIRED
/vlLO" )v Act6i' s /ZS" 3•F.
RELA11ONSHP
PHYSICAL FEATURES
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT
DFLSK
7G A 6.
UALE 30 X 7Z
DESK CHAIR
(2) GUEST CHAIRS
OVERHEAD STORAGE
Aemff 44cx -
f'ECIAL REC)L4REUENTS
SCALE 1/4'
FORM
C CiA.RUAN a: ASS'ck- TES
:Gd NORTH FIRST 5T.
V.- W EAMIS. YINNE SOTA S5471. (612) 330-37:52
CLIENT ORONO ll2q • !
PE.JECT SPACE PROGRAM
ROW OR UNIT FUTM
FUNCTION OR ACCOUL40DATION
R' A" wo"m Wtgt#SGF-.
FLOOF# AREA REQUIRED
/OLO" X /it-ro'• _- air 3.F
RELATIONSHIP
PHYSICAL FEATURES
FURNITURE AND EWPL"T
DESK 30 X 66
44yoT tAEiLL` 30 X 7L
DESK CHAIR
(2) GUEST C-WRS
OVERHEAD STORAGE
figs
PAINT AACK-
F'ECIAL RE00REME'ITS
— ---- - -fxF
BDA14MAAN lk ASSOCIATE'S
2t16 NORM Fitt S T.
...mcAPft K uw TA SSsat_ (612l 339-3752
Ci 111".SSIOII Na L124-1
NAME,
DEPT- PUBLIC WORKS
FUNCTION OR ACCOSAMWATION
LUNCH RODS
FLOOR AREA REDUREO
14'-C" X 23'-0'=322 SO. FT.
PHYSICAL FEATURES
OPEN OFFICE AREA
PANEL SYSTEM
-JL- OFFICE OR ROOM
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT
FLOOR V b Y 1 T 11 F
NAL.. F.YPSUM Sil&2n
PAiNTVa
(12) CMAIRS
K IT C HENETT'E, SIN(, REFRIGERATOR,
UPPER AND LOVER CABINETS
STORAGE RMN
SPECIAL REXRENENTS
CRT
P.C.
LOCKABLE
VALANCE LriHTWj
VISUAL PRESENT.VALL
ULAZMG
11/B' = 1'-
OPF P VR10
20t WR TN f el. T t'T.
MOOS APOLtS. 6MI60EiulA :.bfl--3792
MANS 7dl�t-1''S
on
E
ii
KOJE.C7
CCJMMISS:ON WO.l:Z3.1
Nib:
DEFT: PUBLIC L+OkKS
"CT10N OR hocoMODAWN
LJONEN'S AND MEN'S TOILET:. AMID LOCKERS
FLOOR AREA P.EWRED
Of(-&" s Air- w s 570 S-A
PHY.-JCA.L FEATURES
OPEN OFFIGE M—LA f LMR
PANEL SISTEM WALL _:-
-re--- OFFICE OR RlEXN ,--,
f LlRNITUFif MD E<A;ir*IEr; f
MEN'
li OMEN'S
(t) Tcu
CD STOOL
2) URINAL),
(1) S114K
(1) S1W.
4) LOCKERS WX 13'
(W L GC. KERB 1 f1'>Od' iS�r RItc1/[�
i 1) ERADLEY C1313-EP WA17H
(la SHMIER
SMCIAL RUJUiREMEN
-- C Rl
LOC KARL E--_--
V,'1_4NL'E L.16HT 1I:G
----------------_--
-__. VISUAL Fkf 5 E;J T.k(AL L
—.----._ --� _---
OFFPWII
fix, Nut+. tlI FikS r �r.
�Af EAV(1JS. 10"(501A 55401. (612) 3M-3-P,2
NAME1
Iit_Pff PUBLIC WURKs
FUNC IICtd C* ACCOMMODATION
MECHANICAL EQUIPTHENT RCCM
F L OCIR AREA FiE QUI REIN
18-0' X 12`-0'=216 SO. FT.
PHYSICAL FLAMES
OPEN OFF ICE AREA
PAWL. SYSTEM
k OfFICE ❑R ROOM
FMMIURE .ANU 1OUWMENT
MEalANICAL- LWIF'1MEN1
`eE-C lAt. Itt_t,A IRI.MLN l5
C k' f
VAt.M.-I t ii.14riNC.
_ V1:jI NU. 1-'WI `,I Nl . WALL
til_AZINIS
FLOUR
MALLS
UPFPW3
F (PW1 l 1III .'IIrwI
[a)AKmAN x a.`.::L�CIATES 1:[IMi9l:i ill'IN IH1, 11L<4.1
11w HM'I H nk, I LA.
►***:AIQJS. WMMU.47A ! 54M. (612) 33*-SW
NAI��
ilE_.FT. PURL IC WORKS
FUNCIICJN OR ACCOUMODA n(M
LLELTRICAL/ TELEPHONE R004
R.00R AREA RE OURED
R'--p' X 10f-0'=80 SO.FT.
PHYSICAL FEA.IUkES
OPEN OFFICE AREA
PAWL .,YJTFM
K Or -FILE M." ROOM
FUk hN i1. )RE .ANCI I OU IPMEN T
:�F't {:IJtI FLF_�.Nt;t:.wp=FJ(S
C. h: I
I L II- K A HLI .:
uA►_ANCL I Ji. MNG
visi IAL t'ki %.L,Nr. WALL
GL-ALINti
L'ALLS -- - - -- -
-'SCALE,1/4� 1'-0' __- ___-------_ ------ -----
--
PR0GF?AI-AM1NG F0RM
60AkNAN .k ASSc)C:IATES
206 NORTH F1RS1 ST.
M"CAPOUS, AMNMESOTA 551 1. (612) 339-3752
A
� r
C
k b
= O'
SCAM: Vo,* ar! ibc • 7
PROJECT ORM10
COMMISSMN Na i1?1-1
LEFT
PrIbUC y,C,ZI '3
FUNCTICIN OR ACCOI MODATK N
FIOOF 4F:EA REGUIFct<0 S&-O x /00=0 • SOco SP.
PH YSK'AL FEATURES
UPEN OFFICE AREA FLOOf: -- —_-
- PANEL. SYSTEM k` LS----------- —
OFFICE OR RCKIM
FURNITURE AND EQUiPMENT
M"TITY NOs
1
1.
3 Point Mitch Side Kick-off Power Broom (a$ x 41)
1
2.
Trailer Mount - Side Kick-off Power Broom (81429)
1
3.
500 Gallon Oiler Distributor Trailer Mount (81x121)
1
4.
Fayette Fergerson - Tri Axle Trailer (79x201)
2
5.
Parks Mayer Trailers - Single Axle (8146), (O N121)
1
6.
Back Blade for Utility Tractor 3 Point Hitch (8101)
1
7.
Post Hole Auger - 3 Point Hitch - PTO Driven (4101)
1
8.
1#000 Gallon Water Tank With B/s Gas Engine/on Skids
(99 x 61)
1
9.
Tail Gate Paver (89 x 8,)
72
10.
4 x 8 Dock Sections - Wood/Steel (4' x 81)
100
11.
small Bouys (12' di a. )
16
12.
Swim Area Buoys ( 2' x 41)
6
13.
61 Hydraulic Sanders (81 x 31)
2388.2
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrate
DATE: February 3, 1988
SUBJECT: Baldur Park Road Status
C''UNCIL MitTING
F48 - 81988
CITY OF NO,"
Attachment A. Private Access Over Public Right -of -Way Memo
Dated 12/17/87
ISSUE - Providing the Council with updated information regarding
the status of problem identified on Baldur Park Road as it
relates to private access and public right-of-way.
INTRODUCTION - As noted, at the January 11, 1988 Council meeting
In Attachment A, Baldur Park is among a number of potential
problem areas the City his where there is public right-of-way but
no public streets. When presented on January llth it was
requested that it be tabled until the first meeting in February
in an effort to solicit any general comments or thoughts that the
Council may have regarding the general issue outlined in
Attachment A together with anticipating some movement by the
parties on Baldur Park Road. In a telephone conversation on
February 2, 1988 the property owner who had raised the issue
indicated that nothing further has been done by the neighborhood
to date and in that conversation staff was able to clarify with
the homeowner some issues related to construction of public
streets and condemnation of properties for right-of-way.
RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council make any
additional comments they have regarding either the Baldur Park
situation specifically or other issues raised in Attachment A
generally and that it again be tabled to be brought back at the
March 28, 1988 meeting.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the Council
table further discussion of -this issue untll March 28, 1988.
Ayes _ , Nays __
cc: John Gerhardson, Public Works Director
Jeanne Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator
121787.3 J
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, "ity Administratorpk�
DATE: December 17, 1987
SUBJECT: Private Access Over Public Right -of -Way
Attachment A. Wendy Weihe Letter Dated 12/3/87
B. Orono Letter Dated 1/7/88
C. Baldur Park Road Memo Dated 5/10/86
D. Baldur Park Road Memo Dated 8/4/86
E. Graphics of Selected Streets
F. Map of Public/Private Streets
ISSUE
A. Provision of information to Council regarding selected
community situations related to access and public streets.
B. Determining City policy, regarding handling of these matters.
INTRODUCTION
A. PubT3c Right_ of_Way___PertsMaintained Privately - As noted
in the attached letters the situa_T0-n on ea Fdur Park has over the
years caused problems for the property owners. The situation has
been reviewed several times, including a development proposal
review in the 19781ss a request that the City undertake rip -
rapping to protect its sewer line in 1987 and this most recent
request. The Baldur Park situation of private access on or near
public right-of-way however, is not entirely unique. As noted on
the maps it applies to the following locations:
- Baldur Park Road - S 1/2 Sec. 8
- Oak Street - S 1/2 Sec. 6
- Lyman Avenue - N 1/2 Sec. 2
- Dakota Avenue - S 1/2 Sec. 26
- Woodhill Road - S 1/2 Sec 2
- Bracketts Point Road - S 1/2 Sec. 11
- Wildhurst Trail - Highview Lane - N 1/2 Sec. 7
B.' Public Streets_- No Public_Right of Way - The reverse of the
previous situation is where the City maintains the street but has
no right-of-way or public easement.
- Crystal Bay Road
- Selected areas on Casco Point Circle and Road
- Vine Place
- Long Lake Boulevard
- Elmwood
- Grandview
- Tonkaview
i
- Birch Lane
- Ivy Place
- Chippewa
- Bayview
C. Private to Public - The City does have right-of-way under the
more recently platted private streets for road and utility
easements. In selected cases it has been indicated by the City
at the time of subdivision that when it becomes a connecting
street the City will take over the private street as a public one
and maintain publically. These include:
Countryside Drive
Devon -Kelly
Woodhaven Drive
(together with numerous others).
The City did take over Dickey Lake Drive under a similar
arrangement this past summer when they completed the required
work based on a 1984 approval.
D. Private - No Association - In addition the City has private
streets where no Homeowners association exists or the entire
roadway is not under the associations control as they were
platted/developed in advance of current private road regulations.
- Jamestown Road
- Woodhill Road/Edgewood
- "Pence Lane"
- Hollander
- Walters Port
E. Easements - The areas where private easements are serving
more than two properties but which have no names or formal
association.
"Lydiard" Lane (the road off North Ferndale where the
City has no right-of-way. In this situation the
City Council has directed staff to work on
correcting it)
"Pink Palace" easement off Sz�,:)reline serving 2050 to
2080 Shoreline
- The "Homestead" off North Brown
- Extension off Fox to the west
- Extension east off Spring Hill serving 745 to 765
Spring Hill
- 2 Extensions off North Ferndale serving 625 to 763
North Ferndale
- Extension off Fox between Willow and Old Crystal Bay
Bay serving 2620 to 2650 Fox Street
This whole discussion does tie into the City's ongoing concern
regarding its streets and transporation program (strategic goal
07).
DISCUSSION - The initial alternatives regarding Baldur Park Road
are7outllned in the letter sent to Ms. Weihe. It is expected
that a voluntary association, given the tenor of the
neighborhood, will not accomplish the desired objectives. It is
possible that the City would not even receive a 1001 petition.
The City currently is reviewing its requirement to provide access
to certain properties where it has right-of-way. (This becomes a
variation on the Slaughter case as to the mandate to provide
"legal access" when a building permit has been issued.)
ALTERNATIVE -
Po13cY Alternatives - These are outlined in the letter to Ms.
Weihe, but Tn i1ght of �.he other situations other alternatives
may come to light.
MEE_T_ING ACTION -
�. Acceptance of staff information and directing staff to
discuss at a future date.
2. Establishment of City direction on the matter based on this
information.
3. Table entire matter until future meeting.
RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council initially
discuss their concerns related to this item and based on that
staff will bring it back for discussion at the February 8, 1988
Council meeting.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by that the Council
liaving aiscu�—sed the matter table the issue until its February 8,
1988 meeting at which time Council will give staff general
direction in relationship to these issues. Ayes _, Nays _.
2488. 3 1 g
CIJUNCIL MEETING
TO: Mayor and City Council FEB - 8 1988
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City AdministratorjV CITY
01: ORONO
DATE: February 4, 1988
SUBJECT: Accessory Structures Ordinance
Attachment: A. Accessory Structures/Mabusth Memo Dated 1/28/88
B. Accessory Structures/Gaffron Memo Dated 1/28/88
(sent out under separate cover)
ISSUE - Determination if Council wants to participate in a joint
Planning Commission/Council meeting on the subject of the
accessory structures ordinance.
INTRODUCTION - During the McMillan application staff had an
opportunity to review the accessory structure ordinance. The
review focused on the current restriction of 1000 sq ft maximum
on all accessory structures (except barns which has no
limitation) regardless of lot size. In that review were the
issues of:
- Structure height
- Lot coverage (hardcover in non-LR Zones)
- Number of structures
- Setbacks
- Means to avoid separation of larger accessory
structures from the primary structure by
subdivision
The proposed changes that had originally been presented in July
were fin311y reviewed in December. Based on the Planning
COmmis�:;+o•� Lesponse that the standards presented were not
restrictive Enough relating the amount of structure to size of
acreage, staff presented a memo on conceptual performance
standards fcr the January 1988 Planning Commission meeting. At
that meeting the Planning Commission indicated their desire to
discuss the thrust of the proposal in a joint meeting as noted in
Attachments A and B.
DISCUSSION - While in some ways more restrictive as to total
square footage, height and numbers, it does loosen the 1000 sq ft
maximum as it relates to lot size and is within the general
concepts of regulation to achieve a pleasing residential
community concerned with runoff and non-residential uses in
residential areas.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Schedule meeting
2. Suggest Planning Commission hold a special
meeting to consider
3. Take consideration of a special meeting
RECOMMENDATION -While it has generally been beneficial for the
Planning _ Commission and Council to meet jointly to discuss
conceptual issues related to overall land use philosophy the
proposed meeting would be more related to specific ordinance
language. It is recommended that the Planning Commission hold a
special meeting where interested Councilmembers could attend to
consider that amendment. To the extent that discussion raises
significant general land use issues, those could be discussed at
a subsequent special joint meeting together with other related
issues.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by __, that the Orono
Council desires the Planning Commission hold a special meeting to
develop their recommendations on the proposed ordinance amendment
and if appropriate work to schedule a joint meeting in the
future. Ayes __, Nays _
cc: Charles Kelley, Planning Commission Chairman
Jeanne Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator
Michael Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator
Tot Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
FRONS Jeanne Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
DRTR: January 28, 1968
At their meeting of 1/27/08, the Planning Commission asked that
a joint meeting of the Planning Commission and Council be
scheduled to discuss the proposed accessory structure r *ndment.
If you remember, the current proposal was drafted by Mike Gaffron
after the Planning Commission's preliminary review of the first
draft amendment. Mike Gaffron has sent a copy of the current
proposal to all Councilmembera today for their review. If
Council agrees to the Planning Commission request at their
Council meeting of 2/8/88, the Planning Commission asks r_hat
staff schedule a joint meeting sometime between February ",th -
February 18th. If Council does not agree to a joint meeting,
staff was directed to schedule a special meeting to review the
amendment exclusive of the regular Planning Commission meeting to
be set aside for the review of applications.
Please place the the Planning Commission request under your
agenda at the Council meeting of 2/8/88.
pp/128.1
12788.4
"UNCIL MEETING
F� $ - 81988
CITY OF Mft
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratg n
DATE: Janaury 27, 1988
S08JWT: Highway 12 Corridor Study
Attachment A. Sample Letter of Invitation
ISSUE - Acceptance of information related to February 29, 1988
organizational meeting exploring interest in undertaking a
Highway 12 corridor selection study.
INTRODUCTION_ - Following Council's directive at the meeting on
Ja'naury 25, 1988 Attachment A was transmitted to the following
communities and organizations:
City of Independence
City of Long Lake
City of Maple Plain
City of Plymouth
City of Medina
City of Wayzata
City of Delano
Willmar/Highway 12 Task Force
MnDot District 5
Metre Council
Hennepin County
RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council accept the
information as presented.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by _ , that the Council
accept the information regarding the February 29, 1988 Highway 12
Corridor meeting. Ayes , Nays
CITY of ORONO
Post Office Box 66•Crystal Say, Minnesota W23•Munieipal Offices
On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka
February 5, 1988
Re: Highway 12 Corridor bLudy Meeting - February 29, 198E
Orono High School
Attachment: A. Draft of Preliminary Highway 12 Corridor Study
Process
Dear Mr. Willis,
During the past dear the four communities of Long Lake, Maple
Plain, Orono and Independence have met three times on the
possibility of an upgrade to Highway 12. The impetus for these
meetings has been the work being done by communities from Delano
on west attempting to have Highway 12 upgrs_`ed in order to
improve the economic viability of west -central Minnesota. The
Highway 12 Task Force, which is headquartered at the Willmar
Chamber of Commerce, has been instrumental in generating
discussion regarding Highway 12 and has been working with
Legislators to look at the feasibility of getting it upgraded.
Key however, to any changes on Highway 12 is elimination of the
current bottlenecks between where Highway 12 ceases to be a six
lane in Wayzata to the Hennepin County border. Two years ago the
Minnesota Department of Transportation had nothing programmed for
the next 20 years regarding Highway 12. As a result of interest
by the Willmar group they are lc. -king to put some money
programmed for the mid 190's for cer'ain safety improvements.
Liven the current highway funding climate and politics a local
effort to at least designate the appropriate corridor to handle
the future needs is appropriate at this time, not only from a
transportation aspect but also from a land use standpoint.
The Orono City Council would like to invite you to attend a
meeting of various communities that have an interest in the
BUILDING A ZONING - 47 3.7 35 7 • ADMINISTRATION ! FINANCE - 473 7339 a PUBLIC WORKS - 473-1309
ASSESSING
February 5, 1988
page 2
Highway 12 corridor from Wayzata west. Attachment A is a draft
of a possible selection process. The purpose of the meeting is
to determine how many communities and organizations are
interested in undertaking this study and what financial resources
are available for such a study.
Phe intent of the study would be to determine if Highway 12
its terminus as a six lane in Wayzata west to the Delano
uor.: )r can meet both the current and future demands within the
existing corridor or if it is appropriate F new corridor be
designated through the official map process. If a corridor is
selected then each of the communities could undertake the
necessary official mapping and planning processes in order to
preserve an expanded permanent or alternate corridor. It is not
anticipated that this would necessarily lead to construction of a
new highway in the next five to ten years, but it would preserve
the corridor for consideration at some future timeframe, if the
need so dictated.
The meeting will be held at the Orono High School, 795 Old
Cry::tal Bay Road North at 7:30 P.M. in the cafeteria. The Orono
High School is the building furthest north in the school complex
and the cafeteria is at the northern end of the school building.
We look forward to your attendance.
or questions, please feel free to give
Sincerely,
Mark Bernhardson
City Administrator
MEB/dh
If you have any comments
me a call.
cc: Mayor and City Council
John Gerhardson, Public Works Director
Jeanne Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator
CITY of ORONO
Post Office Box 66*Crystal Bay, Minnesota 553230Muniapal Offices
On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka
February 5, 1988
Re: Highway 12 Corridor Study Meeting - February 29, 1988
Orono High School
Attachment: A. Draft of Preliminary Highway 12 Corridor Study
Process
Dear Mayor Johnson,
The Orono City Council would like to invite you to attend a
meeting of various communities that have an interest in the
Highway 12 corridor from Wayzata west. Attachment A is a draft
of a possible selection process. The purpose of the meeting is
to determine how many communities and organizations are
interested in undertaking this study and what financial resources
are available for such a study.
The intent of the study would be to determine if Highway 12
from its terminus as a six lane in Wayzata west to the Delano
border can meet both the current and future demands within the
existing corridor or if it is appropriate a new corridor be
designated through the official map process. If a corridor is
selected then each of the communities could undertake the
necessary official mapping and planning processes in order to
preserve an expanded permanent or alternate corridor. It is not
anticipated that this would necessarily lead to construction of a
new highway in the next five to ten years, but- it would preserve
the corridor for consideration at some future timeframe, if the
need so dictated.
The meeting will be held at the Orono High School, 195 Old
Crystal Bay Road North at 7:30 P.M. in the cafeteria. The Orono
High School is the building furthest north in the school complex
and the cafeteria is at the northern end of the school building.
BUILDING A MNIV; 4737357 • AnNIVISTRATION A FINANCF. -- 473-7358 • PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359
ASSMING
February 5, 1988
page 2
We look forward to your attendance. if you have any comments
or questions, please feel free to give me a call.
Sincerely,
Mark Bernhardson
City Administrator
MEB/dh
cc: Mayor and City Council
John Gerhardson, Public Works Director
Jeanne Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator
12788CsJUNC+L MEETING
TO: Mayor and City Council *1�
F4$ - 819�'8
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato
DATE: January 27, 1988
CITY OF OROMO
SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Amendment #2
Attachment A. Orono Letter Dated 1/28/88 - Plan Review Time
Extension
B. Orono Letter Dated 1/28/88 - MUSA Extension
ISSUE - Acceptance of information regarding the Metropolitan
Council review of the City's Comprehensive Plan Amendment #2.
INTRODUCTION - The City had submitted its Comprehensive Plan
dm Amenent #2_ for review in November and was given a deadline of
February 15, 1988 by which Metropolitan Council would respond.
At the beginning of the corridor study the City had informally,
through its Engineer, inquired as to the capacity of the Long
Lake lift station and force main. It was indicated at that point
that the capacity was not an issue and that the addition of a
pump, for which a spot was already available at the plant, is all
that would be required. In the spring of 1987 during the review
process of the plan amendment by the Planning Commiss+.on and
Council, the City had sent a copy of the preliminary document to
Metro Council for preliminary review. That informal rev i?w did
not reveal any concerns regarding capacity.
At the meeting on Friday, January 22, 1988 representatives of the
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, Metropolitan Council, the
City Engineer and myself, the Metro Waste and Metro Council
Planners felt that they needed to do more research to determine
the actual capacity of the plant together with the upgrades
before they could determine the extent to which the City's
request for additional units in that area was ;:echnical'_y
possible. As a result they requested that the City grant them a
sixty day extension. If they were not allowed to have additional
time, they would not be able to approve the plan at the level the
plan contemplates. As such Attachment A grants them the
extension.
As a housekeeping item Attachment B was transmitted to the
Metropolitan Council as their documentation does not reflect the
area in Block 3 of the plan, which was assessed for sewer in
1967, as being within the Municipal Urban Service Area line. As
mentioned before the property that was assessed should be
appropriately be contained within the MUSA line.
RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council accept the
information provided relating to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment
#2.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the Council
accept the information regarding the Comprehensive Plan Amendment
#2. Ayes Nays
cc: Charles Kelley, Chairman Orono Planning Commission
Jeanne Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator
John Gerhardson, Public Works Director
Glenn Cook, City Engineer
CITY of ORONO
Post Office Box 66 • Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 • Municipal Oftioas
On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka
January 28, 1988
Mr. Paul Baltzersen, Planner
Metropolitan Council
300 Metro Square Building
Seventh and Roberts Streets
St. Paul, MN 55101
Re: City of Orono
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review
Highway 12 Corridor
Metropolitan Council District 13
Metropolitan Council Referal Number 14023-2
Dear Paul,
As the above referenced comprehensive plan amendment by the
the City of Orono entails further study of the capacity of the
Long Lake lift station by the Metropolitan Waste Control
Commission, the City agrees to a sixty day extension of the
deadline from the original February 15, 1988 deadline to April
15, 1988.
Your assistance in bringing this matter to a successful
resolution is appreciated.
S cerel ,
1
a,{
Ma k E. Ber ardson
City Administrator
MEB/dh
cc: Mayor and City Council.
BUILDING! ZONING - 473-7357 • ADMINISTRA11ON d FINANCE - 473.7358 a PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359
ASSESSING
CITY of ORONO
Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 5=*Municipal Offices
On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka
January 28, 1988
Mr. Paul Baltzersen, Planner
Metropolitan Council
300 Metro Square Building
Seventh and Roberts Streets
St. Paul, MN 55101
Re: City of Orono
MUSA Line Amendment
Dear Paul,
Based on the present documentation that the City of Orono has
on file with the Metropolitan Council regarding the location of
the the Municipal Urban Services Area (MUSA) line as it relates
to the property between Old Crystal Bay Road and willow and
Highway 12 and County Road 6, the City of Orono is amending its
request to specifically add to the Municipal Urban Service Area
extension that portion of area that has already been assessed, as
shown in Figure 23 of its Comprehensive Plan Amendment. This
area was originally sewered in 1967. Documentation should
appropriately reflect its inclusion in the MUSA line. The
request for area previously assessed totals 130 acres.
Should you have any further questions on this matter, please
feel free to contact me.
Sincerely
'T -
Ma k E. Ber ardson
City Administrator
MEB/dh
BUILDING A ZON,NG - 473.7357 • AOMINIS MATWN A FINANCE - 473-7358 • PUBLIC WORKS - 473.7359
ASSESSING
2488.2
C fluNCIL MEETING
TO: Mayor and City Council _ ' FiD _8198 J
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator` P
CITY OF ORONO
DATE: February 4, 1988
SUBJECT: 1972 Shadywood Road
Attachments: A. 1972 Shadywood Road Memo Update
B. Ordinance Section 9.13
ISSUE - Provision of information regarding the citations issued
at the above address.
INTRODUCTION - 'i'.ie issue addressed by the resident at last
meeting dates back to at least 1977. The City in 1982-83
proceeded to prc•ecute the case under a general nusiance
ordinance. This was settled by the attached stipulation.
Subsequent to the stipulation the City adopted Ordinance 9.13
Subd. 14 as noted in Attachment B. F-)llowing complaints in the
spring of 1987 the City pursued a violation of this ordinance and
as noted in Attachment A will also pursue violation of the
stipulation related to efforts to discourage. The amount of
feeding allowed in the 1983 stipulation appears excessive to try
to accomplish the purpose of "efforts to discourage". In
addition the subsequent ordinance is now being violated.
The City's prosecutor is amenable to a negotiated settlement
within the guidelines outlined in Attachment A.
RECOMMENDATION - That Council accept information related to the
citation at_1972 Shadywood. Staff will have the City Attorney
reiterate the desire to settle the matter short of trial with the
resident's Attorney if it is within the guidelines outlined.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the Orono
Council accent the information regarding the ordinance violation
at 1972 Shadywood Road. Ayes r Nays
DATE: February 3, 1988
TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
FROM: Mel Kilbo, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: 1972 Shadywood Road Update
At the pre-trial hearing on September 29, 1987, the attorney
for the resident and the attorney for the City attempted to see
if there was common ground for a negotiated settlement that
would cease the feeding of ducks from here forward. At the
time it did not appear that the resident was amenable to a ne-
gotiated settlement and it was agreed that the attorneys would
argue the status of the 1983 stipulation in light of the pro-
hibition on feeding the ducks that was passed subsequent to
that stipulation. The judge agreed to that and gave the de-
fendant a month to submit a brief and the City Attorney two
weeks to respond.
On January 6, 1988 the judge gave his decision, stating that
the 1983 stipulation is admissable in evidence and shall be
presented to the trier as fact. If the resident has violated
the terms of the 1983 stipulation, then he has committed a vio-
lation of the Orono Ordinance. The converse is also true.
The resident was observed as late as the last week of January,
bringing approcimately 200 lbs. of feed bags. This was called
in by a neighbor and photographed by the police.
The City has proposed the following guidelines:
No feeding for one (1) year from
date of agreement -
Feeding only every third day -
8:00-8:30 am on one occasion -
1:00-1:30 pm on the next occasion -
Feeding only cracked corn or a
mixture of cracked corn, crushed
oats and soybeans -
Only one (1) pound of cracked
corn allowed per feeding -
No feeding after October 1st
or before May 1st of any year -
The matter will be heard on March 10, 1989 at 0900 at the Hennepin
District Court in Ridgedale.
STATE OF
If
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
PHONE NO. ( 612 ) 296-5200
May 1, 1987
Mel Kelbo
Chief of Police
Police & Fire Administration
445 Willow Drive.
Long Lake, MN 55356
Dear Mr. Kelbo,
Mike Grupa, Operation Officer for the Minnesota Department
Divison of Enforcement has asked me to write you concerning
feelings on the feeding of waterfowl.
FILE NO
of Natural Resources
the Department's
Except under extreme circumstances, the Department discourages the feeding
of waterfowl. During the summer months there is generally plenty of natural
occuring foods and supplemental feeding only serves to concentrate ducks
and geese in a small area; often causing nuisance problems. Feeding waterfowl
during winter months is a greater problem es it tends to concentrate large
numbers of waterfowl in very small areas and diseases brought or, by harsh
weather are easily passed from bird to bird. Also, waterfowl fed during
winter months become totally dependant on daily handouts as most naturally
occuring foods are not available.
We know that many citizens enjoy feeding waterfowl, however, it should be
recognized the benefits derived from feeding are only to the citizen and
not to ducks and geese. ;n situations where feeding will continue we recommend
that it cease the first of September so that the bird will migrate to southern
climates for the winter months.
Sinc ely,
Roger N. Johnson
Regional Wildlife Superv-�sor
Carlos Avery Game Farm
5463 W. Broadway
Forest Lake, MN 55025
RNJ:jaa
cc: Mike Grupa
Jon Parker
AN EQUAL OPPOFITUN17 Y EMPLOYE H
GUIDELINES FOR FEEDING DUCKS
No feeding for one (1) year from date of agreement
Feeding only every third day
8:00-8:30 ani on one occassion
1:00-1:30 pm on the next occassion
Feeding only cracked corn or a mixture of cracked corn,
crushed oats and soybeans
Only one (1) pound of cracked corn allowed per feeding
No feeding after October lst or before May 1st of any year
STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN VhRTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
State of Minnesota,
Plaintiff, � a� asej 3120737
v.
Lloyd Nehring,
Defendant.
-000-
The above -entitled matter came duly on for hearing before
the undersigned Judge of District Court on December 4, 1987 upon
motion of the defendant to introduce evidence to the trier of fact.
John T. Hartman, Esq., appeared for the defendant.
Scott E. Richter, Esq., appeared for the plain- '`f.
Based on all files, records and proceedings herein, the
Court being thereby fully advised in the premises,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. That the 1983 stipulation is admissible in evidence and
shall be presented to the trier of f•ct.
Date: BY THE COURT
I
eorge R. Adzick
Judge of District Court
Compliance or non-compliance with the specific terms of the
1983 stipulation is the dispositive issue in this case. The effect
of the stipulation is to modify the ordinance in question by making
more specific, at least as applied to this ':fendant. If the de-
fendant has violated the terms of the stipulation, he has committed
a fer se violation of the ordinance. The converse is also true.
The trier of fact must determine whether the defendant has violated
the terms of the stipulation. In order to do this, the stipulation
must be submitted in evidence. The stipulation wiit also form the
jury instruction: If you find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the
defe:A.int has violated any of Lice terms of the 1983 stipulation, you
sha 1 find th( defendant guilty of violating of (the specific code
sections and ordinances).
GRA
I
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City
DATE: October 6, 1987
10787.10
Administrate ��tV
SUBJECT: Administrator's Information
3536 LYRIC AVENUE - The resident continues to do some work in
putting a foundation under the property, however the work is not
completed and staff will be further monitoring this project for
hopefully having a completion within the next month.
1972 SHADYWOOD ROAD - At the pre-trial hearing on September 29,
1987 the attorney for the resident and the attorney for the City
attempted to see if there was some common ground for a negotiated
settlement that would cease the feeding of the ducks for here
forward. At the time it did not appear that the resident was
amenable to a negotiated settlement and it was agreed that the
attorneys would a: Sue the status of the stipulation in light of
the prohibition on feeding the ducks that was passed subsequent
to that stipulation, The Judge agreed to that and gave the
defendents a month to submit a brief on that matter giving the
City two weeks after that to respond. It is anticipated that a
ruling on this matter will not be received until November or
December.
394t SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - Despite promises by the owner no
progress Fias been na3e end the City will be having its contractor
initiate work on the property within the next week.
2160 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - The PCA did transmit the letter to the
owner indicating certain actions that he must take and
deadlines that he must meet with the feel inci of the PCA at this
point being that the owner of the property is responsible based
on the assumption that the pollution is coming from his property.
In a discussion with the property owner he feels that the origin
of the pollution is not on his property and that he will be
working with PCA through his attorney on the matter.
200 HOLLANDER ROAD - There is presently no further progress on
the matter to report since last time. The representative from
the estate has not been in contact with the City regarding
possible voluntary development of the by-laws for the homeowners
association as had been hoped. The clean-up on the property has
not substantially changed since work earlier this summer. The
City will be continuing to resolve the barn issue and clean-up
during the next month or so.
3405 SHORFL_INE ' IVE - During the past month tte staff in
conjunction with ;iennepin County has reviewed the location of a
new road and sidewalk again for the owner of the property. It
was hoped that this would al low him to make up his mind regarding
the amount that he would have left for parking and balance that
ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT
MESS KfV CONTROL NUMBER IOCAI CONT. AGENCY NCIC 10ENT. ICAGI DATE/TIME RE►011T MADE
E C 1/ / M N 0 2 7 /
L NB1t DATE REPORTED IR►DI TIME 11PO ITR►) LOCATION GRID hill" ILON) DAY: S M T W
0 / Cam, % I Z. Lb / o / //
PLACE COMMITTED 1►lCl
(� S nrn
H
l NBR MAD SOUAD OR BAOGE #�(S�IN) TIME ASIG. (TAB) TIME AIIR. (TAM 11 TIME CL. (TCL) MRD Caton
a�a CI P / I i I j / / R- Redo
A - Aterm
NBR I N UOC UCS OFFICER ASSIGNED JASSISTED by 1 - In Person, VZ
M4I / / I 1 1 C� / r V - Vows, ci
R u0c M— Maul
T - other
L'FFEN-S7E� OR INITIAL COMPLAINT OTHER PRINCIPAL:
It_
COMPLAINT ❑OFFENDER VICTIM E) O.O.B. BUSINESS ADDRESS BUSINESS PHONE
t� IQr,
OTHER RE►ORTSINCLUOED
Impound ❑ Prop Inventory ❑ implied Consent ❑ Accident Report [)Top ❑ Influence Report ❑ Photos ❑
'/*7 /- "OR-c'-7
13 SEE CASE FILE ROLL CALL
Warn III Release
Dept. Assist
Message Deliver
Treated r1 Transported
I
Advised
Citation Issued
Detail Completed
G.O.A.
Ft2 tTZL.:'ic LQ: L V'CC;-k:,e: �r� C ►�i�r ILt�E:.- _� Cr.c. -.�L
'�� r:il0�.)\� l-• �� L• � �i'ti C`tl�(-� �� ` 11� � �1 h11�-l.h'�C2i F tJ 1 ham. t�ti- ✓r��
i t.., I fir - 1-1 e• i F- 'Zt +tit c' w +"•—& %- --♦ Ct—j--, C_ \ %-- :tom ,)/_- %'. .. C"\ - -�U
`ir, tz••_..-���r.X j.. T• rt' z` ��c> /R,�• + Jc��l ���P1\t.�'Il,t�r. Sly ��.•
�`Itl .- �X�-.crv1 .y;<l� }•��.c. ►v7. CS „L 1
el
t
�t.L �)� n �K�)r..J�' r�•� C'� v- 1y•E��l� TT veto SLr J e,..Jr _1L ;l �.+a.t'�ve' . • t�
�1Ctit1 ►i. 43 ....9 Ptc �j,.,l(� lt+ U 17 :Ul �� t, X 1�.� T.'-�.u1 +-�Lt•ll��'r.
r(- �Y7G)1,��
�(�, C� � •„� �; �k�� � r'�l w �: C • 1 .. �. 1 \�. (1L- II Ii , t Y- i t'R't ►=1, .. �' ' i.. C ' —
r.7Pv TO L'�t
CO ATTNv ❑ CITY AT-TN'y ❑ COUriT ❑ CHIEF ❑ OTHER
DISPOSITION Unfoonded Cleared by arrest Ref. other agency Inactive Other
OffICE R S , SUP EHVISO R•S SIGNATUNE
ORONO POLICE DEPAR i MENT
Form 3 FOLLOW UP/CONTINUATION REPORT
Of TENSE
n
H
COMPLAINANT
2
O
ADDAESS
ADDITIONAL VEI AILS 0- U11 fNSt. PAX-..! SS Of INVESTIGATIONS.
`E1C. n
yl' ,
J
iy n bS► + .� •� r� 1 „t- Late v—+ c-- C v v+'r— �^c.rn try. aQ a Inc c._ w TJ� aL
2' 11V :k �.. n n E.>,rv� 11r..✓X 11 < lA✓c. s N'\ Ir C; .. .n c, 15 % A L a w ► 4 0
e ►'t/l� Y� 1 L� J �i �i 1^ �l Y- G �..� V�--s]i . -_ l.'�K^iJ�-L V-�"�� �S iy. �y M 1 �.7�d„►.�t..t
/. 7l L ex.- a�w�,�r„ a., r ai.a aJ�- _ �l'Kej —J� k At.&�\C 1L J 1✓C� N a �_
k' Vv► v. 1 r. F-y�' xl a7 L►
A61 V,e. 1r� F'�Q '= SJ=rc �_G VI-1 /�
r-
01,
DISPO-TION UMlw dr' ' C1..,.d Er •,�. I F., CI,d Reg ql�. •Q.— ' 1 1,011.0 , 0•..
HENNEPIN COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT PROSECUTION SUMMARY
CITY OF ORONO
TO: City IMministrator
Chief of Police
FRO14: Thomas J. Radio
Prosecuting Attorney
DATE: August 15, 1983
-------------------------
Defendant: Lloyd Nehring
Offense: Public nuisance (Orono City Code 5 82.010);
alTowi g accumulation of manure; public nuisance (State
Stat., S 601.74(1); allowing public nuisance
Date of Offense: 10/18/83
Arresting Officer: Thomas J. Jacobs, Orono Building Official
Summary of Proceedings ' : After extensive negotiations regarding
this matter an after umerous rescheduling of the preliminary
conference, the prosecutor and the defendant entered into the
attached stipulation and the prosecutor agreed to dismiss the
charges. This disposition was based on the overall factual
background of this matter and the difficulties of proving a
nuisance at a trial. The defendant considers his feeding ducks
one of his main hobbies. Feeding ducks per se does not consti-
tute a nuisance. It is only when ducks congregate in large
numbers that the public health problems and nuisance problems
result. Hence, since the city cannot totalling ban duck feeding
under its current ordinances and state law, the prosecytor
attempted to define what would constitute problem feeding
and what would not. The numbers arrived at are only approxi-
mations but, if anything, they are perhaps on the low side.
The complaints regarding the ducks on this particular incident
came from only one neighbor. This neighbor, Ronald Potas,
has a particular dislike for the defendant and hence his
complaints must be viewed as somewhat biased.
Disposition: Judge McCarr agreed to the stipulation and
signed it to approve it. This signature will mean that a
violation of the stipulation will allow the city to go in
on a contempt of court citation.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
State of Minnesota, )
1
Plaintiff, )
)
vs. )
Lloyd Nehring, )
1
Defendant. )
MUNICIPAL COURT
THIRD DIVISION
STIPULATION
WHEREAS, Defendant Lloyd Nehring has been charged with the
violation of Sections 82.010 and 82.030(b) of the Orono City Code and
Sections 601.74(1) and 609.745 of Minnesota Statutes, such charges
stemming from and relating to alleged feeding and harboring of wild
duckst and
WHEREAS, Thomas J. Radio, Esq. for the State of Minnesota and
Defendant Lloyd Nehring and his --attorney John T. Hartmann, Esq. have
entered into discussions and negotiations regarding a disposition of
the above -referenced matter and have reached an agreement regarding
the same;
NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant Stipulate and 69ree upon
the following disposition of this matters
1. Defendant stipulates and agrees that on and between October 1
and December 15, and on and between March 15 and June 1 of each year,
he will not put out more than twenty (20) pounds of feed per day for
wild ducks on or about his property located at 1972 Shadywood Road,
Wayzata, Minnesota; and that on and between June 1 through October 1
and m and between December 13 through March 15 of each year, he will
not put out more than thirty-five (35) pounds of feed per day for wild
ducks on said property.
2. Defendant will use his best efforts to discourage large
congregations of wild ducks on his property through all reasonablg
means at his disposal.
3. The State of Minnesota agrees to and does hereby dismiss the
above -stated charges against Defendant.
4. Defendant agrees to pay Twenty Five Dollars ($25.00) as and
for court costs in this matter.
5. The State of Minnesota is not precluded under this
Stipulation from prosecuting the Defendant herein for any future
violation of State law or Municipal ordinance.
Dated this day of , 1983.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
By
Thomas J. Radio, Esq.
Lloyd Nehring, Defendant
Judge of Hennepin County
Municipal Court
JTHC100
13
Telephone 473.7357 f I
September 8, 1983
Mr. Ronald Potas
2032 Shadywood Road
Wayzata, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Potas:
CITY of ORONO
Pont Office Boa 66•Crystal Bay. Minnesota b5323•Municipal Offices
On the North Shore o/ Lake Minnetonka
55391
Upon your complaint and City 'inspection, Mr. Lloyd Nehring was
tagged for a public nuisance, Orono City Code (82.010) allowing
accumulation of manure; public nuisance State Statute (601.74(l),
allowing a public nuisance.
After extensive negotiations regarding this matter and after numerous
rescheduling of the preliminary conference, it was agreed to
resolve the matter by stipulation, which is attached for your
information. The disposition was based upon the overall factual
background of the case and the difficulities of proving a nuisance
at a trial simply because feeding ducks per se does not constitute
a nuisance. The City cannot totally banck feeding under its
current ordinances and State law and is not prepared to do so at this
time.
Ron, I understand your frustration with the desposition of the matter
but it is important for you to realize that the City received only
one complaint which was from you, a neighbor six homes away, from the
defendants residence. '
In review of the complaint and our inspections, the City is not
prepared to spend taxpayers money on further action unless a violation
of the stipulation causes a contempt of court action.
Sincerely,
altJeR4 . B son
Cityministrator
Enclosure
S 9.12
less than five regular business days. A "regular business day" is
one during which the Pound is open for business to the public for
at least four hours between 8:00 o'clock A.M. and 7:00 o'clock P.M.
Impoundment records shall be preserved for a minimum of six months
and shall show (1) the description of the animal by specie, breed,
sex, approximate age, and other distinguishing traits) (2) the
location at which the animal was seized; (3) the date of seizure;
(4) the name and address of the person from whom any animal three
months of age or over was received; and, (5) the name and address
of the person to whom any animal three months of age or over was
transferred. If unclaimed, such animal shall be humanely destroyed
and the carcass disposed of, unless it is requested by a licensed
educational or scientific institution under authority of Minnesota
Statutes, Section 35.71. Provided, however, that if a tag affixed
to the animal, or a statement by the animal's owner after seizure
specifies that the animal should not be used for research, such
animal shall not be made available to any such institution but may
be destroyed after the expiration of the five-day period.
Subd. 11. Other Unlawful Acts. It is unlawful for the
owner of any dog to (1) fail to have the license tag issued by the
City firmly attached to a collar worn at all times by the licensed
dog, or (2) own or keep a dog which is dangerous (any such dog
which has caused injury to persons or property shall be deemed
"dangerous"), or (3) interfere with any police officer, or other
City employee, in the performance of his duty to enforce this
Section, or (4) fail to keep his dog from barking, howling or
whining, or from emitting loud or unusual noise, or (5) fail to
prevent his dog from defecating in or upon public property or the
premises of another, or (6) permit solid waste of a dog to
accumulate on his premises for more than twenty-four hours.
Subd. 12. Immobilization of Dogs. For the purpose of
enforcement of this Section any peace officer, dog catcher or other
person assisting a peace officer or dog catcher may use a so-called
tranquilizer gun or other instrument for the purpose of
immobilizing and catching a dog.
Subd. 13. Warning of Vicious Dogs. The owner of any dog
known to be of vicious habits shall place in plain view of the
entrance to his premises a sign no smaller than 12 inches by 14
inches which shall read: "Beware cf Vicious Dog".
SEC. 9.13. ANIMALS AND FOWL - KEEPING, TRANSPORTING,
TREATMENT, HOUSING.
Subd. 1. Definitions. As used in this Section, the
following definitions shall apply.
A. "Owner" - Any person who owns, harbors, feeds,
boards, keeps, or otherwise possesses an animal, and who is the
head of the household of the residence, or the owner or manager in
ORONO CC 208 (4-1-84)
charge of the establishment or premises at which an animal remainb,
or to which it returns.
B. "Farm Animals" - Cattle, horses, mules, sheep,
goats, swine, ponies, ducks, geese, turkeys, chickens, guinea hens
and honey bees.
C. "Animals" - Includes farm animals and all other
animals, reptiles and feathered birds or fowl except dogs, domestic
cats, gerbils, hamsters and caged household birds.
D. "Dangerous Animals" - Any wild mammal, reptile
or fowl which is not naturally tame or gentle but is of a wild
nature or disposition and which, because of its size, vicious
nature or other characteristics would constitute a danger to human
life or property if it is not kept or maintained in a safe manner
or in secure quarters. The term "dangerous animal" also means and
includes any domestic mammal, reptile or fowl which because of its
size or vicious propensity or other characterictic, would
constitute a danger to human life or property if it is not kept or
maintained in a safe manner or in secure quarters.
Subd. 2. Keeping. It is unlawful for any person to keep
or harbor any animal, not in transit, except (1) farm animals kept
in accordance with the Zoning Chapter, or, (2) animals kept as part
of a show licensed under the City Code, or, (3) animals used in a
parade for which a permit has been issued, or, (4) animals kept in
a laboratory for scientific or experimental purposes, or, (5)
animals kept in an animal hospital or clinic for treatment by a
licensed veterinarian.
Subd. 3. Animals in Transit. It is unlawful for any
person to transport animals unless they are (1) confined within a
vehicle, cage or other means of conveyance, or, (2) farm animals
being transported in a portion of the City zoned for rural
purposes, or, (3) restrained by means of bridles, halters, ropes or
other means of individual restraint.
Subd. 4. Treatment. It is unlawful for any person to
treat an animal in a cruel or inhumane manner.
Subd. 5. Housing. It is unlawful for any person to keep
any animal in any structure infested by rodent, `lies or
insects.
Subd. 6. Trespasses. it is unlawful for any person to
herd, drive or ride any animal over and upon any grass- turf,
boulevard, City park, cemetery, garden or lot without specific
permission therefor from the owner.
Subd. 7. Permit
to keep a farm animal in
therefor from the City.
Required. It is unlawful for any person
any portion of the City without a permit
ORONO.CC 209 A -1-84)
§ 9.13
Subd. 8. Impoundment. Any animal found running at large
shall be impounded in accordance with Subdivision 10 of Section
9.12. All fees or expenses incurred for capturing and impounding
shall be paid before release of any animal.
Subd. 9. Special Permit Required. It is unlawful for
any person to keep or maintain any dangerous animal without a
special permit therefor from the City. No such permit shall be
issued for a period exceeding one year and such permit shall
specify the conditions under which such animal shall be kept. The
Chief of Police shall issue a special permit for the purpose of
keeping or maintaining a dangerous animal if it is found that:
A. The animal is at all times kept or maintained in
a safe manner and confined securely so that the keeping of such
animal will not constitute the danger to human life or property of
others.
B. Adequate safeguards are made to prevent
unauthorized access to such animals by members of the public.
C. The health or well-being of the animal is not in
any way endangered by the manner of keeping or confinement.
D. The keeping of such animal does not constitute a
nuisance and will not harm the surrounding neighborhood or disturb
the peace and quiet of the surrounding neighborhood.
E. The keeping of such animal will not create or
cause offensive odors or constitute a danger to public health.
F. The quarters in which such animal is kept or
confined are adequately lighted, ventilated and are so constructed
that they may be kept in a clean and sanitary condition.
G. The applicant for such special permit proves his
ability to respond in damages to and including the amount of
$100,000.00 for bodily injury to or death of any person or persons
or for the damage to property owned by any ether persons which may
result in the ownership, keeping or maintenance of such animal.
Proof of liability to respond I^ Aamages may be given by filing
with the Chief of Police a cf, of insurance stating that
the applicant is, at the tim: s application, and will be
during the period of such speci4. , nit, insured against liability
to respond in such damages, or by posting with the City a surety
bond, approved by the City Attorney, in the amount of $100,000.00
conditioned upon the payment of such damages during the period of
such special permit. Such certificate of insurance or bond shall
provide that no cancellation of the insurance or bond will be made
unless ten days written notice is first given to the City.
Subd. 10. Invest*lation Required. The Chief of Police
in investigating anv applicant for a special permit under this
Section or any enforcement of this Section, is authorized to
consult with and seek the advice of the Society for the Prevention
ORONO CC 210 (4-1-84)
S 9.13
of Cruelty to Animals, the Humane Socijty, any representative of
the Animal Control Center of the County if there be one, or any
other individual, cgency, organization or society which may be able
to provide information and advice concerning the keeping of
dangerous animals.
Subd. 11. Permit Fee. Upon compliance with all
provisions of this Section, a special permit shall be issued for an
annual fee adopted by the Council by ordinance, provided that such
permit shall not be issued for the keeping of more than two
dangerous animals at any single location.
Subd. 12. Exception. The provisions of this Section
shall not apply to the keeping of dangerous animals in the
following cases:
A. The keeping of such animal for exhibition to the
public by a traveling circus, carnival or other exhibit or show
holding a permit issued by the Commissioner of Natural Resources
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 97.6111.
B. The keeping of such als in a licensed
veterinary hospital for treatment.
C. Dangerous or poisonous reptiles may be
maintained by a bona fide educational or medical institution for
the purpose of instruction or study, provided such reptiles are
securely confined and are prcperly cared for in a manner
satisfactory to the Chief of Police.
Subd. 13. Regulation of Horses.
A. The term "horse" as used in this Section means
any breed of horse. pony, ► or ass.
B. It is awful for any perso. to ride or to
drive a horse after the hour of sunset and bifore the hour of
sunrise along or crossing any public way without appropriate
lighting or reflectorized clothing.
C. It is unlawful for any person to ride or drive a
horse in any public park, beach, golf course or other public
property, except within the right-of-way of public streets and
highways, and in areas duly designated as a trailway or hitching
area.
D. The City Administrator shall designate and sign-
post those areas in public lands, parks and beachis where horses
may be ridden and driven.
E. Every person riding a horse or driving a horse-
drawn vehicle upon a public street shall he subject to those
provisions of the City Code applicable to the driver of a motor
vehicle, except those provisions which by their nature can have no
application.
ORONO CC 211 (4-1-84)
5 9.13
F. , unlawful for any person to interrarr with
any horse being ridd,a, . iven or kept in a lawful manner.
Subd. 14. Feeding of Waterfowl. It is unlawful for any
person to feed or provide feed for any non -domestic ducks, geeE,e or
other waterfowl in a manner that results in the accumulation of a
sufficient number -of waterfowl so that the excrement of the
waterfowl accumulates in such a way as to cause a danger to the
health, safety and welfare of the public, or in such a way as to
induce the waterfowl to alter their natural migratory pattern, or
in such a way as to cause the waterfowl to congregate for extended
peuiods of time on any -neighboring or nearby property or water.
SEC. 9.14. CVR1r611,
Subd. 1. Curfew - Minors Under the Age o` Fifteen. It
is unlawful for any minor person under the age of fifteen years to
be or loiter upon the streets or public )laces between the hours of
10:00 o'clock P.M. and 5:00 o'clock A.M. of the following day.
Subd. 2. Cu-` - Minors Between the Age of Fifteen and
Fighteen. It is un' for any minor person over the age of
fourteen years but •e age of eighteen years to be or loiter
uror 'he streets or _ic places between the hours of 12:00
O'c',C,:k midnight :and 5:uo o'clock A.M. of the following day.
Subd. 3. Curfew - Parents and Guardians. It is unlawful
for any parent, guardian, or other person having the legal care or
custody of any minor person to allow or permit such minor person to
be or loiter upon the streets or public p`4ces in violation of this
;action unless such minor is accompanied by a person of lawful age
hav ' n4 such minor -,n in charge.
Subd. 4. Curfew - Places of Amusement, Entertainment or
RF- reshment. It is unlawful for airy person operating., or in charge
if, any place of amusement, entertainment or refreshment, or other
glace of business, to allow or permit any minor person to be or
loiter in such place in violation of this Section unless such minor
is accompanied by a person of lawful age having such minor person
in charge. This Subdivision shall not be construed to permit the
presence, at any time, of any person under age in any place wt,-r-
his pres.e,:i-:A is-therwise prohibited by law.
L,ubd. 5. Exceptions. Such curfew shall not app:: to any
stidents -_ir,der the age of eighteen years who are lawfully
attending, going to or returning from school, church or community
sponsored athletic, musical or social activities or events.
Source: City Code
Effective Date: 4-1-84
(Sections 9.15 through 9.19, inclusive, reserved for future
expansion.)
ORCNO X 212 (4-1-8a)
DATE: February 3, 1988 C`_ �UW CIL MEETING
TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator FEB -819a
FROM: Mel Kilbo, Chief of Police CITY OF ORONO
SUBJECT: Fire Service Contracts
Most of our present fire contracts were last updated and
signed in 1977. I have updated the contracts by reviewing and
bringing contract sums up to date. The fire chiefs were given
copies of their respective contracts as well as contracts that
we have with the other cities. It was suggested that several
of the contracts did not have provisions that might be added
in future years. (The contract copies for each city are at-
tached for your review.)
We are asking the council to review and approve the updated
contracts, and to authorize the City Administrator to sign the
1988 fire contracts.
TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Marc Bernhardson, City Administrator 1 `�
Attachments: A. 1988 City of Maple Plain Fire Contract
B. 1988 City of Long Lake Fire Contract
C. 1988 City of Wayzata Fire Contract
ISSUE - Approval of fire contracts for 1988 with 3 of the 4
cities serving Orono.
ALTERNATIVES -
1. Adopt as presentee,
2. Amend and boopt,
3. Table to negotiate any terms deemed prudent.
RECOMM_FNnA_TION - Forwaro.• d recommending approve The Chief has
worked to update them -^n`racts for 1988 as to amounts and dates
with substanti4F from previous years. During 1988 he
will he reviewing v the Cityies, other provisions that maybe
appropriate for e,.-., of their contracts for 1989 as there is
considerable disparity between them in the i-sues ad'ressed. The
Mound contract wi 1' be presented at the March 14, 1988 Council
meet i ng .
PR("'r):',F.n MOTION - Muved by , seccnded by , to approve the
Maple Plain, Long Lake and Wayzata Fire Contracts for 1988. Ayes
Nays
c hte] Kilho, Police Chief
Tom 1,uehn, Finance Director
CONTRACT FOR FIRE PROTECTION BETWEEN THE CITY
OF MAPLE PLAIN AND THE CITY OF ORONO
DEFINITIONS
1.01 Fire Protection. The protection of life and property from
damage or destruction by fire together with such emergency rescue
operations as may be authorized by the Maple Plain Fire Chief or
designee.
1.02 Fire Customer. A municipality or other public agency to which
Fire Protection ;^ supplied by the City of Maple Plain including,
without limitation, all or portions of Medina, Independence, Orono,
Minnetrista, and the Hennepin County Park Reserve District.
1.03 Servicg Year. The year during which Fire Protection is actually
provided.
1.04 Annual Consideration. The total cost of Fire Protection
payable to the City of Maple Plain by the Fire Customer for and
during the Service Year.
1.05 Total Fire Protection Cost. The estimated cost of providina
Fire Protection to all Firms Customers and to the City of Maple Plain
during the Service Year.
1.06 Serv�c�_Are a. The land area of the Fire Customer described
on Exhibit A hereof, to which Fire Pr.-;-ect'c is provided during
the Service Year.
FIRE PROTECTION PROVIDED
2.01 In accordance with the terms and conditions hereof, the City
of Maple Plain shall provide Fire Protcction in that portion of
the City of Orono described on Exhibit A which attached hereto
and made a part hereof by reference; The City of Orono shall pay
to the City of Maple Plain for such Fire Protection, an annual
consideration payable in four equal installments on the 15th
day of January, April, June and September of the Service Year.
CALCULATION OF ANNUAL CONSIDERATION
3.01 On or before August 1 of each year preceding the Service Year,
the City Clerk of the City of Maple Plain shall submit to the City
Council for approval the estimated total fire protection costs for
the Service Year, including, without limitation, the following
factors :
(1) Salaries of fire fighters;
(2i Radio contract costs;
(3) School, seminars, conferences and related travel costs;
(4) Fuel, oil and automotive supplies;
(5) Cost of maintenance and repair of equipment;
(6) Cost of office operations, maintenance and supplies;
(7) Cost of insurance and bonding;
(8) Cost of dues and subscriptions;
(9) Cost of professional services;
(10) Cost of Firemen's Relief Association;
(13.) Cost of publishing and printing;
(12) Cost of utilities, including hear, electricity & telephone;
(13) Cost of housing, office and equipment, based upon reasonable
estimate rental of similar quarters;
(14) Cost of equipment, replacement, spread over a period of
15 years.
3.02 The Fire Customer shall calculate and provide to the City of
Maple Plain on or before August 1st or the year preceding the Service
Year, the totiAl Assessed Valuation of the Service Area to which
Fire Protection is provided as shown on Exhibit A hereof.
3.03 The City Clerk of the City of Maple Plain shall calculate the
ratio which the Assessed Valuation of the Service Area of each Fire
Customer bears to the aggregate Assessed Valuation of the aggregate
Service Areas of all Fire Customers and the CIty of Maple Plain,
expressing such ratio in per centum calculated to the nearest
100th of 1 per centum.
3.04 The Fire Customer shall pay to the City of Maple Plain, an
Annual Consideration obtained by multiplying the per centum derived
in Section 3.03 times the Total Fire Protection Costs.
3.05 On or before September 1st of the year prededing the Service
Year, the City of Maple Plain shall provide to the Fire Customer,
the amount of the Annual Consideration together with a resonably
detailed summary of the calculations outlined in this subdivision.
ADJUSTMENTS
4.01 On or oefore March 1st of the year following the Service Year,
the City Clerk of the City of Maple Plain shall tabulate the actual
Total Cost of Fare Protection for the Serivice Year and recalculate
the Annual Consideration pursuant to the formulas set forth in
Section 3 hereof, using actual cost figures. If said recalcualtion
indicate a credit is due to the Fire Customer, it shall be shown
as a deduction,one- fourth thereof on each of the next four sur_ceed-
ingly quarterly payments, and if it is a debit, it shall be shown as
an addition, one-fourth thereof, on each of the next four succeed-
ing quarterly payments, and if it is a debit, it s?311 be shown as
an addition, one-fourth thereof on eac'.. of the t four succeeding
quarterly payments.
4.02 The Fire Customer hereby agrees to pay to the City of Maple
Plain as additional Annual Consideration, any debit adjustment
calculated hereunder and the City of Maple Plain hereby agrees to
reimburse to the Fire Customer any credit adjustment calculated
hereunder.
TERMINATION
5.01 This agreement shall commence on the first day January 19
and remain in full force and effect during the calendar year of
it s commencement and three full calendar year thereafter. It
shall automatically renew each calendar year thereafter unless
canceled by any party. Such cancellation shall bE effective for
the calendar year next succeeding the year during which notice of
calcellation is given, only if the party desiring t.) cancel serves
written notice upon the other party on or before August 1 of the
last calendar year of operation of the agreement.
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
6.01 In case of concurrent fires, either within the several areas
served by the City of Maple Plain or under any Mutual Aid Agreement,
the Fire Chief of the City of Maple Plain shall weigh the relative
risk of loss to life and property posed by the concurrent fire% nd
shall make a final determination on the advisability of committing
equipment and fire fighters to the concurrent fires. In making
this determination, and in making the same determination in the case
of sing;` fires, the Fire Chief shall also consider the feasibility
of making the fire run in light of road conditions, weather conditions
and all other conditions which shall effect the safety of fire
fighters and equipment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hands
this day of , 19
The City of Maple Plain
By:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
DATED:
Fire Customer, The City of
Orono.
By:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
City of Orono, Minnesota -�.,. ,_.. MIA
• --
/ 98 f ME SE/Zv/CE ,U/STI?. /C
CONTRACT FOR FIRE PROTECTION
i. This agreement, made and entered into this day of
2. 19 , by and between the City of Long Lake, a municipal corporation
3. of the county of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, (herein after called
4. "Long Lake") and the City of Orono, a municipal corporation of 'tie
5. County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota (herein after called "Orono"):
6. 1. In consideration of the terms, covenants and other matters
7. that are hereafter set forth, Long Lake agrees to furnish fire service
8. and protection to the property located in Orono and as shown, on the
9. city map of Orono, which map "1988 fire service districts is incor-
10. porated herein by reference" and Long Lake further agrees that its
11. firemen will make a reasonable effort to attend fires within the
12. said limits of the City of Orono when notified of such fire;
13. That in the event of two fire calls from municipalities or individuals
14. under contract with Long Lake, the first call shall have priority, and
15. the second call shall be answered as soon as possible, it being
16. stood by the parties hereto that Long Lake has m.ide or contemplates
17. making similar contrac}s with other municipalities or individuals
18. other than Orono.
19.
2. The road and
weather conditions
are to be
suci, that the fire
20.
run can be made with
reasonable safety
to men and
Pquipment, and the
21.
decision of the fire
chief or otner fire
department
officer in charge
22. shall be finalized as to whether road and weather conditions make
23. a fire run possible or advisable.
24. 3. That Lona Lake shall not be liable in any way to Orono,
25. or to any inhabitants or property owner wit:iin the limits of the
26. City of Orono as shown on said map, or to any person, firm or
27. corporation for failure of Long Lake's Fire Department to attend
a fire, or put out a fire, or for damage to goods, property, or
29. for any act of omission.
30. 4. Long Lake shall purchase, own and maintain in good order
31. such fire apparatus and equipment as it may consider necessary and
32. suitable for fire service and fire protection to Orono and to such
33. other municipalities or individuals as Long Lake contracts with, it
34. being understood that property within Long Lake shall have the
35. first call on the service of the Long Lake Fire Department.
36. 5. Long Lake agrees to furnish not less than five (5) firemen
37. on each call within the said boundries as shown on the said map in
38. the City of Orono.
39. 6. That Long Lake shall care -I liability insurance protection
40. itself against damage claims of its firemen for personal injuries
41. sustained while in service within tri said limits of Orono as heretofor
42. set forth, and further carry liability insurance saving both parties
43. harmless so far as negligent acts of the firemen of Long Lake are
44. concerned.
45. 7. A. Cc.',mand Responsibility. The fire chief of Long Lake
46. or his deputy shall have the sole and exclusive right and responsibility
47. to prescribe the manner and method of aivinq the alarm for fire within
R
the service area, and
to prescribe
the manner and me of responding
49.
o calls and rendering
the services
contemplated. The said fire chief
50.
or his deputy shall immediately
upon
arrivi— -t the scene of any alari,i
51.
or ::ire emergency have
the sole and
exclusi,,sponsibilitl and
52.
authority tc direct and
control anv
and all Ii--efightinq anc emergency
53.
operations at such scene
cr scenes,
including the direction of Orono
54.
polica officers at the
scene with respect
to traffic control, orotection
55.
of citizens, and ether
incidents of
the emeraencv.
56.
B.
Nature of. Long Lake Undertaking. In
no event shall this
57.
agreement be
construeu to fix upon Long Lake any
rest— ibility or
58.
liability to
Orono or to third parties which are
gre-. ?r or different
59.
in kind than
the responsibilities and liabilities
Torre by Orono
60. if it were providing such services through its own fire department.
61. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the fire chief of
62. Lonc, Lake or his deputy will have the sole discretion as to the mer.
63. ar.d equipment that will answer each alarm, provided that protection
64. will be reasonable considering available men and equipment, and it
65. shall not be a violation of this agreement nor shall Long Lake be
66. held responsible to Orono or a thir,9 party for any loss which may
67. result in the event Long Lake, in the exercise of reasonable judgement
68. is unable to respond or to respond promptly or to respond with only
69. limited men and equipment, or is delayed in responding to a call by
70. reason of answering a previous call. Orono agrees that it will
71. indemnify Long Lake for any judgement rendered against it or sums
72. paid out by it in settlement, payment or defense of any such claims.
73 8. As and for compensation for the said fire protection, Li
74 Lake shall charge Orono, and Orono shall ray to Long Lake, a sum
Dual to that percentage which Orono's limited assessed valuation
76. within the said corporate limits served by Long Lake is to the total
77. limited assessed valuation of ott-r municipalities or persons under
78. contract for like --r similar fire protection provided by Long Lake,
79. including Lonri Lake's limited assessed �alua`.ion, tines the annual
RO. Regular Fire and Spe^ial Fire budget of Long Lake. Payments l^y
81. grono sh-.11 be made in quarterly installments and sn all be C-me due
82. dna payable at the start of each gliarterl.y period of e ce_ !nder year,
i.e.: January 1, April 1 , July 1, and :;ctobt 1. The annual Req»lar
R4, Fire- and Special Fir- blidce` nt Long :.,ake shall be sul mi-ted to Orono
i
85. on or before September 20th of each calendar year.
86. 9. This contract shall be and remain in force for the period
87. of One year and after date hereof, and from year to year thereafter
88. unless either party gives notice of request to amend or terminate
89. 90 days before the anniversary date of the contract.
ATTEST
City Clerk
A7'TE`:T:
CITY OF LONG LAKE
Mayor
City of Or-oi.o
City Admi•rcistrator Mayor
City of Orono, Minsota---�:. ,•, ==_ ne
/ 98a Fi�2E- s�2vicE
�-vim--- �'-
AGREEPSENT
TH15 AU KEEMENT, made and entered into this
day of 19 by and between the CITY OF WAYZATA, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter for convenience
referred to as "Wayzata", and the CITY OF ORONO, a Minnesota
municipal corporation, hereinafter for convenience referred
to as "Orono":
ment; and
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Wayzata maintains a volunteer fire depart-
WHEREAS, Orono does not maintain a fire department
and desires to purchase fire protection from Wayzata;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants
herein contained, the parties hereto agree as followE:
1. Services to Be Rendered. During the tern of
this agreement, Wayzata shall furnish all fire fighting
services to Orono for the area outlined in red on the attached
map marked Exhibit A, hereinafter for convenience referred to
as "Service Area". All of said Service Area is located within
the corporate limits of Orono. Such services shall be sub-
stantially the same in extent and quality as those rendired
by Wayzata within its own corporate limits and shall utilize
the equipment and personnel of Wayzata.
2. Terr:. Wayzata undertakes to provide such ser-
vices during the period beginning midnight, January 1, 19
and expiring at one rd nute: before midnight, December 31, 19 11
unless extended in accordance with the provision,:- hereo:.
I
3. Compensation. Orono agrees to pay to Wayzata and
Wayzata agrees to accept as full payment for services rendered
during the term specified in paragraph 2 above the payment amount
stipulated in Exhibit B. The payment may be made on a quarterly
basis.
4. Command Responsibility. The fire chief of
Wayzata or his deputy shall have the sole and exclusive right
and responsibility to prescribe the manner and method of
giving the alarm for fire within the Service Area, and to
prescribe the manner and method of responding to calls and
rendering the services contemplated. The said fire chief or
his deputy shall immediately upon arriving at the scene of
any alarm or fire emergency have the sole and exclusive
responsibility and authority to direct and control any and
all firefighting and emergency operations at such scene or
scents. including the direction of Orono police officers at
the scene with respect to traffic control, protection of
citizens and other incidents of the emergency.
5. Orono Not Responsible for Expenses. All ex-
penses of maintaining Wayzata's equipment, apparatus, salaries,
insurance premiums and any and all other items of expense
connected with the services to be performed by Wayzata under
this agreement shall be at the sole expense of Wayzata, and
the sole amounts payable from Orono to Wayzata shall be the
amount specified above in paragraph 3.
-2-
6. Nature of Wayzata's Undertaking. In no event
shall this agreement be construed to fix upon Wayzata any
responsibility or liability to Orono or to third parties which
are greater or different in kind than the responsibilities
and liabilities borne by Orono if it were providing such
services through its own fire department. Without limiting
the generality of the foregoing, the fire chief of Wayzata or
his deputy will have the sole discretion as to the men and
equipment that will aiswer each alarm, provided that protection
will be reasonable considering available men and equipment,
and it shall not be a violation of this agreement nor shall
Wayzata be held responsible to Orono or to a third party for
any loss which may result in the event Wayzata, in the exer-
cise of reasonable judgment, is unable to respond or to
respond promptly or to respond with only limited men and
equipment, or is delayed in responding to a call by reason
of answering a previous call. Orono agrees that it will
indemnify Wayzata for any judgment rendered against it or
sums paid out by it in settlement, payment or defense of any
such claims.
7. Extension. This agreement may be extended for
successive terms of one year upon the mutual written
assent of both parties entered into prior to the expiration
of the then current term.
-3-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The parties hereto have executed
this agreement the day and year first above written.
CITY OF WAYZATA
By_
Mayor
And
City Manager
CITY OF ORONO
By
Mayor
And
City Administrator
City of Orono, Minnesota
/ 98a fi��- SErzvicE
P/STi2IC TS
h
lw,�.1
�," a�iorya"u
�� K
r v v T n T T n
The CITY OF WAYZATA and the CITY OF ORONO, do hereby
agree to the terms indicated in paragraph 2. This Exhibit B shall
be executed each year of service extension.
In consideration of term, paragraph 2, the par,..•-�s agree
as follows:
1. The terms of said agreement shall expire at one
minute after miAnight, December 31st 19 unless
further extended prior to that date by mutual
agreement.
2. Orono shall pay to Wayzata the sum of $
for fire protection rendered during this period,
payment of which may be made on a quarterly basis.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
agreement on , 19
CITY OF WAYZATA
By
Mayor
And
City Manager
CITY OF ORONO
By
Mayor
And
City Administrator
CITY OF WA I ".ZA TA
600 RICE STREET, WAYZATA. MINN. 55391
PHONE 473-0234
January 12, 1988 r, n �n
JM 2 2"
1
Mr. Tom Kuehn i1
City of Orono lU\
Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Dear Mr. Kuehn:
Enclosed are four copies of a proposed extension of the agreement between
Wayzata and Orono for the provision of fire service to a portion of Orono this
year. If acceptable, please execute two copies of this Agreement and return
them to me for our files.
You will note that the annual charge for fire service this year is $3,500. As
in the past, this charge is based upon the percentage of calls in Orono for the
preceding three-year period. Following is a breakdown of calls from June 1,
1984 to May 31, 1987:
Calls in Calls in Total
Orono Wayzata Calls
June 1, 1984 - May 3"', 1985 4 81 w85
June 1, 1985 - May 31, 1986 7 91 98
June 1, 1986 - May 31, 1987 9 101 110
20 (7%) 273 (93%) 293
Following is a summary of budgeted °ire Department expenses for 1988 and the net
amount of such expenses chargeable 'o Orono:
1988 Operating budget less Fire
Relief Association payment $50,100 x 7% • $3,500
Also enclosed is a bill for the first half of this year's fire protection
service. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
v /
Russell Van Gompel
Finance Director
RVC/js
Encs.
S
EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT
The CITY OF WAYZATA and the CITY OF ORONO, on this day of
19 , do hereby agree to extend for another full year their
previous Agreement, dated April 19, 1977, whereby Orono purchased from
Wayzata fire protection services.
In consideration of such extension, the parties hereto agree as
follows;
.. The terms of said previous Agreement shall expire at one
minute before midnight, December 31, 19 88, unless further
extended prior to that date by mutual agreement.
2. Orono shall pay to Wayzata the sum of $ 3,500
for fire protection rendered during this additional period,
payment of which may be made un a quarterly baxis.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Extension
of Agreement the day and year first above written.
CITY OF WAYZATA
Mayor
And
City Manager
CITY OF ORONO
By
mayor
And
Clerk -Administrator
}
C'silhC�1 MEHING
vis - 819a
To: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator 0TY OF ORONO
From: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director
Date: January 26, 1988
Subject: West Hennepin Recycling Commission Joint Powers
Agreement Renewal
Attached for review and approval is the West Hennepin
Recycling Commission Joint Powers Agreement for 1988.
The only changes from last years agreement is the addition
of the cities of Greenfield and independence to the the
Commission and the cost schedule for each community.
RECOMMENDATION: To approve the West Hennepin Recycling
Commission Joint Powers Agreement for 1988.
PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by , seconded by , to approve the
West Hennepin Recycling Commission Joint Powers Agreement for
1968. Ayes , nays
To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members \\1l
From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administratos� q
Forwarded recommending approval.
WEST HENNEPIN RECYCLING COMMISSION
H. Greenfield -Independence -Long Lake -Loretto -Maple Plairi-Medina-Minnetonka Beach -Orono
2052 County Road 24 Hamel, MN 55340 473-4643
January 111, 1988 '
Dear City Clerk,
I have enclosed your city's copy of our joint powers
agreement. I have also attached blank signature sheets
to sign in addition to the one attached to your joint
powers agreement.
Please;
1. Have both the city clerk and mayor sign all signature sheets
including the one attached to the joint powers agreement.
2. Mail back the unattached signed sheets in the enclosed
envelope.
3. Keep your joint powers agreement and it's attached sheet
For your city records.
I will mail back the other sheets when I get them returned
from the other cities. 'then, please attach the signed sheets
to your joint powers agreement.
Please return these to me by February 16, 1988. If you have
any questions please call me at 473-4643, if I am not
available please ask for Sandie. Thanks.
Sincerely,
Carolyn 1-mit.h
WHRC Coordiantor
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT mado by and among the Cities of Greenfield,
Independence, Long Lake, Loretto, Maple Plain, Medina, Minnetonka
Beach and Orono (hereinafter refer: .i tc collectively as the
"Participants") is effective on the clay and year provided herein.
1. PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY. This Agreement is entered into under the
authority of Minnesota Statutes section 471.59. The Participants
have determined that it is to their mutual advantage to form a single
joint powers entity that shall establish and operate within the
present and future boundaries of the Participants a program for
recycling acceptable materials. Urder the proposed recycling program
(the "Program"), residents will be encouraged to deposit recyclables
at central collection facilities established and operated under this
Agreement. The central collection facilities will be supplemented
by a mobile collection unit that will travel on a periodic basis
between several satellite locations. The collected recyclable
materials will be hauled to commercial recycling centers where they
will be sold.
2. COMMISSION. There is hereby created the West Hennepin Recycling
Commission (the "Commission") consisting of eight commissioners.
3. Appointment and Term. The governing body of each Participant
sila_1, by a majority vote, appoint a person, who may or may not be an
elected official of the participants, to serve as a commissione-.
Appointments shall be for a two-year period unless the respective
governing body makes the appointment for a lesser period. Commissioners
shall serve until their successors are appointed and qualified.
Vacancies shall be filled for the une;;pired term by the appropriate
governing body. A vacancy occurs upon the death or resignation of
a commissioner.
b. Compensation. Commissioners shall serve without compensation
by the Commission. Reimbursement of expenses for eac, commissioner
shall be governed by state statutes and the charter, ordinances, and
policies of the Participant that commissione: represents.
C. Officers. The Commission stall choose one of its members as
a chairperson. The coordinator shall act as secretary -treasurer.
The chairperson shall preside at all-neetings of the Commission.
The secretary -treasurer shall keep a i-omplete record of each meeting
and of all proceedings and business o:" the Commission and shall keep
.an accurate arrounting of all receipt!, and disbi.irsements of the
Commission. The chairperson and secretary -treasurer shall sign all
contracts authorized by and in the nano of the Commission.
d. Meetings. The Commission -hall m et ;it such tiros and
places as it shall deem appropriate but. a' Ist c.nce every twelve
months. All meetings shill be open to tt• lic.
P. _Voting Requirements. All actions of the Commission shall
require a simple majority of the Cc mmissin'iers nr(,ent and voting.
A majority of the commissioners shall constitute a quorum.
3. POWERS. The Commission shall establish and oversee the
operation of the Program. The Commission shall have the authority
to:
(a) enter into contracts in accordance with Minnesota
statutes section 471.345, subd. 5, as may be
necessary to accomplish its purpose;
(b) hire, on an independent contractor basis, such
persons as are necessary to operate the Program,
including but not limited to a program coordinator;
(c) lease a site for a central collection facility; and
(d) apply for and administer grant monies as necessary
to fund the Program.
In no event shall the Commission incur obligations in excess of
its funding as provided in paragraph 4.
4. FUNDING. Funding for the operation of the Program shall come
from grant monies, Hennepin County, funds from any sale of recycla:,',e
materials, and city contributions. The cities agree to the following
formula for funding in 1988:
$500 plus $2.50 per household
Greenfield ------------------------ $1,665.00
Independence---------------------- 2,667.50
Long Lake------------------------- 2,445.00
Loretto--------------------------- 857.50
Maple Plain----------------------- 2,077.50
Medina---------------------------- 2,802.50
Minnetonka Beach------------------ 1,037.50
Orono----------------------------- 6,917.50
Each Participant shall contribute 10% of its share by January 30,
1988, thereafter up to 22.5% will be contributed quarterly as needed.
Each Participant agrees to contribute to the Commission any funds
it receives from any source for projects or programs involving
recyclable materials. In addition, the Participants may, but are
not obligated to, contribute additional funds to the Commission
for the operation of the Program.
5. PUBLIC EDUCATION. The Participants agree to assist in the
distribution of recycling -related information. The distribution
of such information shall be distributed via mun;.cipal newsletter,
water bill enclosures, general media news releases, and other
mutually agreeable communication methods.
6. EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this Agreement shall be
the date upon which the last of the eight.Pariticpants has caused this
Agreement to be executed pursuant to an authorizing resolution of
its gov-rninq body.
-2-
7. TERM. This Agreement shall continue in effect until December
31, 1988, unless extended, renewed, or terminated by the Participants
pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 8 below.
8. MODIFICATION. This Agreement may be extended, renewed, terminated
or amended by agreement of all the Participants as authorized by
resolution of each Participant's governing body.
9. WITHDRAWAL. A Participant may withdraw prior to the expiration
of the term of this Agreement or any subsequent extensions thereof
by giving 90 days' notice in the form of a resolution of its
governing body, Gerved by certified mail on the secretary -treasurer
of the Commission. Service shall be deemed to have, been made on
the date of mailing. Any grant monies or other funds received by
the withdrawing Participant or the Commission, either prior to or
after the effective date of withdrawal, that are attributable to the
Participant's participation in the Program prior to its withdrawal,
shall be paid to and remain the property of the Commission.
10. DISTRIBUTION UPON TERMINATION. Upon expiration of or termination
of this Agreement, any assets remaining after the payment of outstanding
ohligations shall be distributed to the Pariticpants in proportion to
their monetary contributions calculated over the life of the Agreement.
11. LIABILITY AND WORKS COMPENSATION INSURANCE. It is understood
and agreed that public liability insurance and workers compensation
insurance will be provided relative to the activities of the Commission
and its waste recycling collection. It is anticipated that the Cities
of Medina and Greenfield will arrange for this coverage and that,in
the event either city incurs any cost as a result of such coverage,
the Commission will reimburse said City for such cost.
12. ADDITIONAL PARTICIPANTS. The number of Participants may be
increased during the term of this Agreement by amendment, pursuant
to the provisions of paragraph 8 above; provided that any new
Participant shall also cause the Agreement as amended to be executed,
pursuant to authorizing resolution of its governing body.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Cities of Greenfi,?ld, Independence, Long
Lake, Loretto, Maple Plain, Medina, Minnetonka Beach and Orono have,
pursuant to authorizing resolution hereto attached, caused this
Agreement to be duly executed.
- 3_
CITY OF GREENFIELD
By
s ayor
By
Its Clerk
Date
CITY OF INDEPENDENCE
By
s Mayor
By
s Verk
Date
CITY OF LONG LAKE
By
s Mayor
By
s Clerk
Date
CITY OF LORETTO
By
s Mayor
By
s Clerk
Date
CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN
By
s Mayor
By
s Clerk
Date
CITY OF MEDINA
By
Its Mayor
By
s Clerk
Date
CITY OF MINNETONKA BEACH
By
s Mayor
By
Its Clerk
Date
CITY OF ORONO
By
Its Mayor
By
s Clerk
Date
2288.1
"6WL MEETING
TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
� fEa - s sae
FROM: Thomas M. Kuehn, Finance Director''
DATE: February 2, 1988 OF ONONO
SUBJBCT: Insurance Agent of Record
The City of Orono Agent of Record Agreement is due for renewal
for policy year 1988. It is my recommendation to continue the
agreement with Mr. Duweyn Carlson of the Apple Valley Agency as
Agent of Record. Mr. Carlson continued his high level of service
to the City through out 1987. The fee for service requested for
1988 is $5,500.00 which is a modest 2.8% increase over 1987 and
has been budgeted. Also please note that the fee is reduced by
commission earned through the policy premiums paid by the City.
For example the fee for service in 1987 was $5,350 but after
applying the commissions the City•s direct cost was $1,060.00.
I have attached a copy of the agreement for Agent of Record for
1988.
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratov
Forwarded recommending approval.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by __, to appoint Mr.
Duweyne Carlson, Apple Valley Agency, as Insurance Agent of
Record for 1988 at a fee not to exceed $ 5, 500.00. Ayes __, Nays
2288.2
CITY OF ORONO
AGENT OF RECORD AGREEMENT
Duweyn P. Carlson of the Apple Valley Agency agrees to perform
the following services for the City of Orono:
1. The negotiation and placement of all the required
insurance;
2. Information on relevant changes in insurance
markets, products and services;
3. Assistance in developing comprehensive insurance
coverages;
4. Provide an insurance policy inventory and summary;
5. A complete accounting of commissions earned (direct
only) on the account;
6. A cumulative five-year premium and loss record;
7. Prepare an allocation of premium by department as
required by the City;
8. Loss exposure list and classification; up -dated
annually;
9. Assist with all claims and losses;
10. Assistance in minimizing premiums; reviewing and
auditing rating basis, formulas, etc.
11. Assistance in loss prevention engineering and loss
control;
12. willingness to keep an in -agency record of losses
including reserves established;
13. Assist the City in Risk Management program.
The fee for service for the Insurance Policy year 1988 will be
$5,500.00 and will cover the following:
1. Conduct an Exposure survey and prepare
specifications
2. Obtain quotes
3. Review policies, hillings and claims
The City agrees to pay $1,500.00 upon delivery of the policies,
and the balance of $4,000.00, less commissions received, upon
documented presentation.
This agreeemnt is valid for the calendar year 1988.
APPLE VALLEY AGENCY
Date -- - ------------------- ----- --
Duweyn Carlson
C ITY OF ORONO
Date James Grabek, Mayor
Date Mark E. Bernharc�oon, Cit Administrator
2
2388.1
C"JA L MEETING
TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator FE-a -81988
FROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director OF ORONO
DATE: February 3, 1988
SUBJECT: Disposal of Excess Property
The Orono Police Department has four (4) car top emergency light
bars which are outdated and no longer needed. These light bars
have basically no trade-in value and have an individual value of
not more than $50.00 each. The light bars are to be used only
for approved purposes/vehicles so cannot be sold to the general
public at the regular annual City auction of excess and unclaimed
personal property.
Under Orono Municipal Code, Chapter 2, Section 2.61, Subd. 3 the
City Administrator may recommend to the City Council that certain
personal property owned by the City is no longer needed for
municipal purposes and should be sold. The City Council declares
the property surplus, the value is estimated, and the City is
authorized to dispose of the property as stated in Section 2.61
Subd. 3.
The property in question, four car top emergency light bars,
which have a value of $50.00 each can therefore be sold by the
City Administrator through negotiated sale. Chief Kilbo has
three vendors who have expressed interest in purchasing one or
more of these light bars. These vendors operate tow trucks or
house moving equipment.
It is requested that the City Administrator seek Council approval
to dispose of this property through negotiated sale.
TO: Mayor and City Council �
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator`�
Forwarded recommending approval.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to declare four
individual police department car top emergency light bars as
surplus municipal property; said light bars are valued at no more
than $50.00 each, and the City Administrator is hereby authorized
to dispose of said property through negotiated sales. Ayes
Nays
I �)
C ;'UgCIL MEETING
DATE: February 3, 1988
f c6 - 819n
TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
FROM: Mel iCilbo, Chief of Police CITY
ye 1V
O� O�
SUBJECT: Step increases, Officer Anderson, Officer English
Officer Bruce Anderson will attain his 10 year anniversary on
March 1, 1988. He has performed well during his tenure here.
I request his vacation accrual rate be adjusted to reflect his
11 year of service which begins March 11, 1988.
Officer Irving "Chip" English will at:tiin his 3 year anniversary
on February 11, 1988. Chip has devF"_,;,od well, receiving commen-
dations and compliments for his seivi,.z. He is currently working
on an alcohol and drug awareness prCL:=:am for school age children.
I request he be raised from the 2 year level ($2365), 187 contract,
to $2628, the 3 year level, 187 contract, effective February 11,
1988.
TO: Mayor and City Council
��lROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator��,
Forwarded recommending approval as being in accordance with the
1987 contract.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by _, that the Orono
City Council approves the increase in vacation accrual from 120
hours per year to 144 hours per year for Bruce Anderson effective
March 1, 1988,-and increase in the hourly wage rate for Chip
English from $ 13.645 to $ 15.161, in accordance with the 1987
contract effective February 11, 1988. Ayes , Nays
cc: Chief Kilbo
Tom Kuehn, Finance Director
Personnel File (2)
2388.3
CIANCIL MEETING
TO: Mayor and City Council EEO -819e8
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator CITY OF
OAM
DATE: February 3, 1988
SUBJECT: Administrator's Information .
3405 SHORELINE DRIVE - On January 28, 1988 the Building Inspector
was able to meot with the owner and his contractor on -site to
review the interior structural condition of the building.
Following that review it was determined that the current
structural integrity of the building has not been degraded to the
point of being in a hazardous condition. As such the foundation
for the commencement of hazardous building proceedings against it
for the current structure is not present, as long as adequate
safeguards to entry are maintained.
200 HOLLANDER ROAD - On January 28, 1988 the property owners of
200 Hollander Road agreed to the conditions of having the barn
removed by themselves commencing February 16, 1988 and completing
it no later than February 29, 1988. If either of these dates is
not met, they have agreed that the City can have their contractor
come in and have it removed.
BIG ISLAND BOARD OF GOVERNORS_ - As noted in Attachment A the Big
Island Board o Governors are requesting permission of the
Legislature to split off from their camp, 15 of the approximately
60 acres total of the property. They have 3 or 4 prospective
parties interested at this time. They do need permission to sell
part of the property from the State. They are aware that any
such split would require a formal subdivision from the City and
that any future user of the split off property would have to meet
the zoning standards of the City. This is provided for
information only at this time as the City has no formal
applications to deal with this property split off.
LAKE MINN_E_T_ONKA CONSE_R_VATION DISTRICT - METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
ANALYSIS - Attachment B 1s the report alluded to by JoEllen Hurr.
it summarizes the Metro Council staffs perspectives and
recommendations regarding LMCD's progress and direction.
Attached also is the 1986 report for comparison purposes.
GOAL SETTING STATUS - See Attachment C.
1 February 1988
Commissioner
State of Minnesota
Department of Veteran's
St. Paul, MN 55155
Big 1as e,id Veterans Camp
P.O. Box 598
Excelsior, MN 55331
Affairs
Attention: Mr. William Gregg - Commissioner
Subject: Notice of Planned partial Sale - Big Island Veteran's Camp
Dear Mr. Gregg:
Pursuant to the provisions of M.S. 1
Bi Island Veterans Camp hereby gives
so a of the Camp real property. By a
Board authorized to offer for sale
property. Depending on the terms of
may be sold If proceeds are adequate.
all offers.
197.133, the Board of Governors of the
statutory notice of a planned ppartial
majority vote on 20 January 1988. the
a maximum of 15 acres of the Camp
a particular offer, less than 15 acres
The Board reserves the right to reject
Proceeds from the partial sale will be used to complete renovation and
development of the remaining tract of approximately 45 acres. It 1s the
Board's position that M.S. 1197.133 requirements for transfer of proceeds of
a sale to a trust account apply only to a total disposal of the Camp
property. If a buyer can be located, a plan which sets forth the proposed
uses of funds that are de-i ved from the sale will be developed and submitted
for your roview.
This notice is given prior to the start of the February 1988 legislative
session. Your prompt action in advertising pursuant to M.S. 1 197.133 is
essential to identify interested governmental agencies. It is requested that
your office assist in negotiating acreage and price with any governmental
agency that expresses an intent to purchase.
It should be noted that this partial sale is a revenue -producing action on
the part of the Board and does not evidence any Intent to liquidate the
Veterans Camp property. Camp re -opening for day and tent camping is planned
for early summer of 1988 4nd can be accomplished without receiving proceeds
from the proposed sale. The Board remains firmly committed to the successful
resumption of Camp operations for the benefit of the veterans of Minnesota.
Please contact either Mr. Alan Mlsdorf at 890-4180 or Mr. Keith Aakre at
939-2441 if you have any giestions concerning this action.
For the Board.
Edward S. Morrow
Chairman
Board of Governors
619 Island Veterans Camp
FEB 1 188 1.4:03 61- 939 1480
To: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator
From: Thomas J. Jacobs, Building Official
Dates February 2, 1988
Subjects Big Island Veterans Camp - Inspection
On January 29, 1988, an inspection was conducted by Jeanne X4busth and
myself. During this inspection we found the followings
1. Boathouse - The west wall is deteriorating, more than found in
other inspections. The concrete block on this wall is falling apart
and tipping over. Also found on the south wall both corners have been
shored up and concrete block foundation has been installed without
approval.
2. Berg Hall - We found every window and the front entry open to the
public. We entered the structure and found foot prints and evidence
of vandalism. At each end of the second, floor windows appear to be
doors with no stairways. About an 18' drop to grade. Walls are being
busted up on the interior and exterior. This structure and the types
of vandalism are causing a greater danger to the public.
3. Dining Hall - The dining hall is left open to the public and there
are signs of people entering. The crawl space access was left open
leaving a hole in the floor. The porch area has an access trap door
to the basement which is a hazard to people walking in the structure.
Windows and screens are broken and ripped apart.
4. North Hill Area - All structures with exception of one (Building
#12) are open to the public. This includes the caretakers cabin. Also
cound were footings and foundations (new) which appear to not extend
below the frost line %42 inches).
5. Berg Cabin, West Block i East Block Cabins - These structures were
also open to the public. The debris has been cleaned up in the block
buildings. Chimneys are still up.
6. Cook Cabin - The structure is open to the public. The brush and
debris has been cleared from around the structure.
7. Peanut Row - These :-structures are also open to the public. The
foundations of these structures shows why we have a major problem with
stacking concrete blocks. They are falling over and movement of the
ground has blocks moving in all directions.
8. Hill Area - All structures except the restrooms are open to the
public. Cabin 19 is left in a state of possible collapse. One corner
is held up by a 4x4 which is tipping over.
9. General - While we were on the site we found no one in charge. We
61d see a number of snowmobiles and signs of people wandering around.
Also a burning permit was applied for and the site was inspected. We
found that they are burning mattresses and other unapproved materials.
MET ROPOL ITAN COUNCIL
Suite 300 Metro Square Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
612-291-6359
RTRCT nRAVT
DATE: January 19, 1988
TO: Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission
Metropolitan Systems Committee
FROM: Jack Mauritz, Parks Division
SUBJECT: Report on Lake Minnetonka Conservation District ('.MCD)
Activity in 1987
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
In 1985, the Metropolitan Council began a study of issues around Lake
Minnetonka at the request of the State Executive Council. In its April 1986
report to the Executive Council, the Council made several recommendations about
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) which, in sum, stated that LMCD
should become a more proactive agency with respect to surface use management of
the lake. If it did not, the Council was to take a "more directive procedure."
A January 1987 Council report ("A" attached) said that in the balance of 198.:
LMCD had suggested initiatives which could help, if implemented. It also said
it would review the LMCD's activities again at the end of 1987.
1987 LMCD ACTIVTTY
In 1987, LMt; has circulated a list of 13 legislative proposals and received
the response of its member municipalities ("C" attached). It has requested
proposals from consultants to conduct a study leading to a comprehensive
surface use management plan for Lake Minnetonka to be completed 1988-1990 ("B"
attached). It has continued and moderately expanded its permitting and project
reviews of recent years and increased its activity as an information "clearing-
house" for permits and regulations pertinent to the lake ("D" attached).
ANALYSIS/ISSUES
o LMCD has not yet brought about a memorandum of understanding between all the
permitting ',nd regulating bodies on the lake as recommended by the Council.
It should. ;L h•.4 chosen, as an alternative, to serve as an information
clearinghouse.
o LMCD has initiated a 13-point legislat-ve plan. The Council finds eight
di?-ectly responsive to recommendations, two of local interest and three for
which it should +pservo support/opposition until the planning process is
completed.
2
o The issue of appropriate LMCD constitution remains open, no conclusions or
recommendations should be made by the Council until the plan is completed.'
o The LMCD has a three-year study and planning schedule. There are reasons why
it should be accelerated. A Council grant would help.
o LMCD bases its planning process on the consultant and its own members. A
technical advisory and policy advisory committee would help by incorporating
a wide perspective.
CONCLUSIONS
o LMCD should be doing a few things that it has not.
o LMCD has begun activities to meet the Council's major concerns, many depend
upon results of the study and plan. The Council should reserve its decision
until the evidence is in.
o The current sche�jle is too long, and the planning process is too narrowly
based. The Council should help by accelerating the study and by ensuring a
wider perspective in the process.
RECOMMENDATIONS
That Metropolitan Council should:
1. Conclude that LMCD has begun a program which will lead to a comprehen
sive lake surface management plan for Lake Minnetonka.
2. Offer a planning grant to LMCD on the condition that it aL;ilerate the
plan and ensure that the planning process will incorporate a regional
perspective.
3. Offer to participate in a technical advisory committee and a policy
advisory committee for LMCD's planning process.
4. Direct staff to stay in contact with LMCD discussions and report to
the Council again in 1989 or at such time as significant changes call
for a report.
5. Request LMCD to modify its work plan to addres. Metropolitan Council
recommendations not under way or incorporated :,thin the study and
pl.aroing process.
BACKGROUND
in 1985, the Minnesota Executive Council requested that the Metropolitan Council
examine and recommend solutions to the regional issues over public access and
use of Lake Minnetonka. The Metropolitan Council created a task force to con-
duct the study, accepted a report from its task force in early 1986, and sub-
sequently transmitted a Council report to the Minnesota Executive Council. The
April 1986 Council report dealt with several aspects of public activity on am
around Lake Minnetonka. The report was not confined to regional recreation d
to a regional park on the lake. It recognized a wider spectrum of Council
interest in this important regional resource.
3
In its 1986 report to the Minnesota Executive Council, the Metropolitan Council
said, among other things, that LMCD was the most appropriate agency to deal
with issues about lake surface use. It said that LMCD should generally become
a more proactive body with respect to surface use management on Lake
Minnetonka. The Council said it intended to follow activities around the lake
by agencies such as Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) and Suburban
Hennepin Regional Park District (SHRPD). It directed staff to prepare a report
on lake -related agencies' activities for the Metropolitan Systems Committee.
If there -3 no progress, "increasingly directive procedures" were to be
pursu he Council. During 1986, other lake agencies were eliminated from
the r :ecause of study elsewhere, and the January 1987 report became
essevit...Ll, ionfined to LMCD.
In the January 1987 report (copy attached "A"), the Council concluded that LMCD
had proposed some things which would help to meet expectations, if imple-
mented. The Council did not recommend changes in January of 1987, did
recommend some specific actions to LMCD, and also told staff to study LMCD's
1987 activity and to report again in January of 1988.
This second LMCD report responds to the 1987 Council directive. It describes
LMCD activities through 1987, draws some conclusions and recommends Council
actions for 1988.
Discussion
COUNCIL RECOMMENDATIONS TO LMCD
The Council's expectations of LMCD were first stated in its April 1986 report
to the State Executive Council. The essence was that LMCD should become a more
active planning, coordinating and regulating body for managing surface use of
Lake Minnetonka. Suggested actions include:
1. Securing a memorandum of understanding among many agencies which share
responsibility for the lake.
2. Exerting its current powers to the utmost and seeking new powers it
may need.
3. Identifying funding needs and sources for the expanded activity.
4. Taking an active role in securing public accesses and a regional park
on the lake.
Other specifics included in the Council report to the state were:
o Itemize and confirm costs to lake municipalities for providing free
public access to the lake.
o Develop recommendations to meet the costs itemized for municipalities.
o Seek increases in the boating safety fund and an increase in grants to
operating agencies (see LMCD legislative program numbers 7, 9, 1U, 11).
o Seek exemption for LMCD tax levy from the commtnities' levy limits (see
legislative program number 6).
4
o Become a lead agency for planning, coordination and review of projects
that will affect the lake (see legislative program numbers 3, 8).
LMCD ACTIONS IN 1987
The activities listed were reported principally in five sources as follows:
o Minutes and other publicly released LMCD documents.
o Interviews with LMCD Executive Director, Chair and Vice -Chair.
o Interviews with other interested persons including 1983 and 1985 Tas'
Force members, staff of lake area municipalities and others acquaints_
with LMCD.
o Newspaper and other articles published about LMCD during the year.
o Staff observation during 1987.
LMCD actions in 1987 which staff found to be applicable to Council recommenda-
tions, include:
o Issuing a request for proposals to conduct a study and develop a draft
comprehensive management plan for Lake Minnetonka (see letter attached,
"B"). In late 1986, LMCD contracted for a scoping study. The report from
the scoping study is the basis for a comprehensive study proposal which
will address 10 issue areas related to lake surface management. The study
appears to have the potential to lead to a comprehensive management plan.
The project is scheduled over three years. LMCD has budgeted $50,000 for
the first year, 1988. It intends to budget up to $50,000 in each of two
succeeding years. LMCD is pursuing other public and private sources to
meet the balance of the estimated $250,000 limit and has some of the
$100,000 pledged or in hand.
o Continuing to develop the 13-point legislative program initiated for
early 1987. Modifications (from the original) since the last review are
few and minor. The proposed program has been reviewed by each LMCD member
municipality and the response assembled in a matrix (see program and
matrix, "C", attached).
o Continuing the permit and project reviews :.f past years plus adding
new rules dealing with:
- "drystacking" in marinas
- defining boat length/slip limits
- defining rules for special events, such as fishing contests
- defining charter boat licensing, including liquor licensing,
pilot requirements and other areas
- marina standards and permit requirements
o Continuing to collect lake -related permit information from other agencies
and, now, serving as a clearinghouse for permit forms and directions to
appropriate agencies and offices (see "D", attached).
o Consulting with Minnesota DNR, Metropolitan Council and Suburban Hennepin
Regional Park District on a variety of lake -related matters. LMCD also
provided a member for Hennepin Parks Advisory Task Force on the Lake
Minnetonka regional park plan in Minnetonka.
W
Other actions which correspond to Council recommendations are described in the
analysis of LMCD's legislative plan, topic 2, below.
ANALYSIS AND ISSUES
To prepare this report, staff examined areas where LMCD activity coincided with
Council recommendations. The analysis also considered LMCD decisions,
especially in the proposed legislative initiatives, which could relate to the
long-term goal of implementing a comprehensive lake surface management plan.
Topics brought up frequently in interviews were also reviewed. If issues were
found, they are reported. In some instances, alternatives are suggested to
mitigate or remove perceived issues. The order of presentation does not imply
priority among the topics.
Topic 1: Memorandum of Understanding
LMCD has not convened a meeting or meetings leading to a memorandum of under-
standing among agencies with authority on the lake. LMCD has increased its
activity as a clearinghouse, but this does not reach the same goal. It is
important that all the agencies which share responsibility and authority meet,
air their concerns, clarify their authorities and identify areas of agreement
and disagreement. Where there is agreement, there are no issues. Where
disagreements or overlaps exist, LMCD should moderate talks which bring all the
actors to a common direction and remove redundancy. The goal is better public
service and a better protected resource. LMCD is not likely to reach the same
goal by acting as the sole contact between agencies since it does not have the
powers to be an independent arbiter of conflict. There's room for discussion
about the breadth of each topic for such a meeting, i.e., would it be better
confined to one issue, such as dredging, or would it be better to focus on a
wider issue? There's little question about the need for the process.
Topic 2: LMCD's Legislative Plan
LMCD has identified new powers and funding sources in its legislative plan.
The question is, is the current LMCD legislative initiative supportable by the
Council? The program listed below (and "C" attached) shows only minor changes
from the legislative program drafted in late 1986, which the Council said LMCD
should circulate. LMCD, in 1987, has reviewed the program with each member
municipality, with varied results, as reported in "C." There is no evidence
that the plan was carried elsewhere and no comments reported from any other
agency.
1987 LMCD Legislative Proposals
Several of the 13 points are direct responses to task force/Council recom-
mendations. Each of the underlined entries in the following list respond to
Metropolitan Council recommendations. The others, numbers 1, 2, 4, 5 and 12,
are discussed below.
1. The District should receive authority to set fees and require permits for
watercraft use of Lake Minnetonka to support lake -related programs.
2. The District should request authority to assess a property owner to recover
costs for removal of dilapidated docks, boats, other structures, or fallen
trees from the lake.
0
3. The District should have review authority for any research or other
project having lake impact.
4. The District should request that its authority be extended to provide for
planning, funding, acquisition, development, ownership and operation of
launching facilities and other means of public access to the lake.
5. The district should request per diem and expense allowances for board
members.
6. The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District levy should be exempted from
municipal tax levy limitations.
7. The district should receive boating safety Viands for planning, research
and regulation.
8. A11_ agencies and political subdivisions of the state should be required
to notify the district prior to conducting research on Lake Minnetonka and
to keep the district informed about the progress and results of such
research.
9. The district should request that both boating safety funds and their
allocations to high activity areas be increased by the legislature.
10. The district should request that boating safety and other state and
county funds allocated to the Water Patrol be increased and distributed by
usage and activity to support an expanded program.
11. The district should request that lake maintenance funding for the count
be supported from boating safety or from other special funds establishe
the state and county and be increased.
12. The district should request regional funding for public access facilities.
13. The district should request that the boat registration procedure should
be updated, be made more efficient, and that license fees should be
increased.
Number 2, assessing property owners for costs of cleanup and number 5, per
diem for board members, are local housekeeping in nature.
The remainder, numbers 1, 4, and 12, merit greater attention, as follows:
Lake Use Permit
1 - LMCD should receive authority to set fees and require permits of
watercraft using Lake Minnetonka. This was reported as an issue but not
endorsed in the Council's 1986 report. It was included at the request of
a minority :)f the 1985 task force.
Mn/DNR opposes this recommendation as an infringement on their statutory
authority to license watercraft. Several operating agencies also have
pointed out that if this lake becomes the subject of a special permit, it
likely that every heavily used lake in the state will form some body to
request a local permit.
In its defense of the concept, LMCD insists that the fee and permit is
not a mechanism to exclude nonresident boaters from the lake, but is a
means to better control use as well as a revenue source.
The Council could reserve further action on this issue until a documented
study and management plan discussion fully explore the idea. As a member
with DNR in the Metro Region Water Access Task Force, the Council can
scarcely take a different position without compelling evidence. As an
alternative, for an experimental period, could DNR and LMCD devise a pro-
gram with a use sticker, to be required of all boaters on the lake, but
with no fee requirement? This would provide the user control and the
ownership, registration and user information of a permit and could reason-
ably be said not to exclude anyone from the lake. It might be possible to
recover the cost of such a program from a voluntary donation in lieu of a
fee if the request makes it clear that the program's purpose was better and
more enjoyable boating on Lake Minnetonka.
4 & 12 - LMCD as a Regional Operating Agency
item 4 states LMCD should become an operating agency for launch facilities
and other public access to the lake, and Item 12 states LMCD should be
eligible for regional funding for lake access facilities. The Council
decision on these items could be affected by two events not yet in. First,
the LMCD management plan will need to discuss and justify this major step.
Second, the Council's recommendation for a Lake Minnetonka Regional Park
stated that LMCD should be considered as a regional implementing agency if
Hennepin Parks were unwilling or unable to achieve a park on the lake.
That issue is under separate discussion and is clearly not decided at this
time. Council policy makes it clear that a proliferation of regional
implementing agencies is not desirable. A "preferred alternative" is that
Metropolitan Council not endorse LMCD's legislative initiative, pending
completion of the management plan.
TODic 3: Constitution of LMCD
Is the LMCD appropriately constituted to manage and protect a regional resource
with a wide constituency? Currently, each LMCD board member is appointed by
the city council of one of the 14 lakeshore communities. The Council's 1985
Task Force first raised the possibility of reconstituting LMCD as one of the
"increasingly directive procedures" which might be followed if the LMCD did not
move to become a more proactive managing agency on the lake. The subject has
been raised in several quarters since.
The Council's conclusion, in January 1987, was that no "increased directive"
was necessary. The conclusions in this report do not support immediate change.
However, the issue continues to be raised, both within and without the lake
community.
The resolution for this issue, with so many others, lies in the study and
planning process which LMCD is beginning. One of the 10 issues to be addressed
in LMCD's plan is governmental structure. Whether the LMCD planning process
will adequately address the issue and, especially, provide an appropriate forum
for the proponents of change, is open to question. Asking a governmental body
to rate itself is unusual. In this instance, however, "LMCD watchers" con-
cerned with this issue will assuredly make a best effort to be involved in the
planning process. The Council's interest, e.g., in maintaining a regional
perspective, will be pertinent in this question.
0
r
Any recommendation for change, from 1.MrD or P19Pwherej will necessarily becom
a legislative initiative. As pointed out elsewhere, LMCD will need wide
endorsement for its legislative program to pass. The LMCD planning process
should be the appropriate forum to debate this issue and changes should not be
initiated until the plan is in.
The Council should not endorse a partial LMCD legislative request. LMCD member
cities, outside interests and the Metropolitan Council will each find issue
with some of the current proposals. Opening the issue of LMCD's representa-
tion in a piecemeal fashion and without a fully endow ed proposal can only lead
to trouble.
One reason for LMCD legislation is their need for funds to carry out planning.
Another is that waiting for plan completion on its current schedule would post-
pone change to at least the beginning of 1991--longer than most actors are
willing to wait. Both of these factors support the suggestion that the Council
could make an important contribution to this process by granting funds to
accelerating the plan.
Topic 4: Planning Schedule
The LMCD proposes a three-year study prior to drafting a comprehensive plan. A
draft comprehensive lake management plan for the beginning of 1991, at the
earliest, appears to be a long delay. Council recommendations were for action
in 1986 and 1987. Some LMCD communities have voiced their concerns with the
status quo, and the issues persist. Finally, some lake communities face deci
lions that could seriously affect the lake and may not be able to wait. The
crux of the issue is that LMCD legislative proposals should follow the study
and planning process rather than be decided in advance. An LMCD legislative
program will need endorsement outside the Lake Minnetonka community. Wide
endorsement is unlikely until the planning process is concluded and recommenda-
tions fully documented. A plan with sufficient endorsement to be implemented
is needed to end the unceasing battles which have centered around Lake
Minnetonka.
An alternative would be for the Council to seek funds for a planning grant to
LMCD. One hundred thousand dollars could accelerate the process, possibly in
time for a presentation early in the 1989-90 legislative session. Sources for
the funds include the community planning loan fund at the Council or, if judged
more appropriate, requesting a special legislative appropriation for the
purpose.
Topic 5: Planning Participants
The study process proposed by LMCD's RFP does not chart involvement for other
than LMCD and the consultant. Nothing in the document excludes others, but
involvement outside LMCD is not prescribed. There are reasons for involving
others in the planning process, not the least is avoiding the charge that
results are provincial, hence unfair to the general public. The LMCD study
should incorporate a regional perspective from start to finish. As an alter-
native to the current restricted plan, the Council could recommend as follows:
1) LMCD should develop a technical advisory committee to work with LMCD staff
and the consultant. The committee should include staff from such agencies as
DNR, Metropolitan Council, SHRPD, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Cray
Freshwater Lab, Hennepin County Public Works, Sheriff's Water Patrol, etc. 2)
9
LMCD should create a policy advisory body with representatives from Hennepin
County, Carver County, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Metropolitan
Council, Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District and other interests. Such a
group would especially help to insure endorsement for governmental and funding
recommendations.
This alternative also argues in favor of the Council aiding/providing a
planning grant to LMCD. Financial participation would strengthen the Council's
voice in establishing a process with a regional approach to involve lake users
and interests outside the immediate lake community.
Conclusions
1. LMCD should undertake the "memorandum of understanding" which the Council
recommended in its 1986 report. Acting as a clearinghouse is not as
effective and will not resolve the issue.
2. LMCD has been working to,,:ards resolution of several issues originally cited
in the Council's 1986 Report to the State Executive Council and in the
Council's January 1987 report on LMCD activity.
3. LMCD has incorporated several Council recommendations in its work on the
issues, specifically into its proposed legislative program.
4. Resolution of several major issues depends upon LMCD completing the study
and plan for surface use management.
5. It would be advantageous to most parties if the study could be completed
earlier than scheduled. The current schedule postpones plan adoption, and
recommendations are needed.
6. The study and planning process should incorporate interests beyond the
immediate lake community or the resulting plan may not be implemented. A
technical advisory committee and a policy advisory committee would be a
feasible way to incorporate the wider viewpoint.
7. The Council should not endorse a legislative initiative by LMCD until a
plan which meets remaining regional concerns can be reviewed and endorsed.
8. A planning grant from the Council's local planning assistance fund could
help achieve both the accelerated completion date and incorporation of a
wider perspective in the planning process.
RECCMMENDATIONS
That Metropolitan Council should:
1. Conclude that LMCD has begun a program which will lead to a comprehen-
sive lake surface management plan for Lake Minnetonka.
2. Offer a planning grant to LMCD on the condition that it accelerate the
plan and ensure that the planning process will incorporate a regional
perspective.
10
3. Offer to participate in a technical advisory committee and a policy
advisory committee for LMCD's planning process.
4. Direct staff to stay in contact with LMCD discussions and report to
the Council again in 1989 or at such time as significant changes call
for a report.
5. Request LMCD to modify its work plan to address Metropolitan Council
recommendations not under way or incorporated within the study and
planning process.
01.19.88
GH005B/PHOPN106
ATTACHMENT A
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Suite 300 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
DATE: January 6, 1987
TO: Metropolitan Systems Committee
FROM: Jack Mauritz, Parks and Natural Resources Division
SUBJECT: Report on Lake Minnetonka Activity by the
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD)
INTRODUCTION
The Council's report to the State Executive Council, in 1986, contained a
requirement on page 20, first paragraph, as follows:
5. Metropolitan Council staff shall report to the Metropolitan Systems
Committee on activities on Lake Minnetonka by LMCO, Suburban Hennepin
Regional Park District (SHRPD) and other active agencies by Jan. 15,
1987. If no progress or inadequate progress is the case, as judged by
Metropolitan Council, an increasingly directive procedure should
begin....
This document constitutes a report on the 1986 activity of Lake Minnetonka
Conservation District with respect to recommendations from the Metropolitan
Council Task Force on Lake Minnetonka and recommends Council action. It also
reports, in lesser detail, un activity by SHRPD, Hennepin County and DNR. No
Council actions are recommended with respect to these three agencies.
BACKGROUND
I. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
In essence, the task force report as adopted by the Council recommended that
LMCO should become more active as a planning, coordinating and regulating body
for lake surface use on Lake Minnetonka. Several activities are recommended in
thQ report, including:
A. Convening a meeting(s) leading to a memorandum of understanding among the
agencies involved on the lake which itemized each duty and an agreement
about process.
B. Exerting present powers to the utmost and identifying and seeking new
powers needed to carry out its responsibility for surface use management on
the lake, including preparation of a surface use plan.
C. Identifying funding needs for the increased activities and actively
pursuing them.
D. Taking an active role in securing needed accesses plus a regional park on
the lake.
E. Several other specifics of lesser scale.
II. Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District
The task force report recommended that a regional recreation open space agency,
most logically SHRPD, prepare a master plan and acquire, develop and operate a.
regional park entity on the lake.
III. Hennepin County
The report recommends that Hennepin County continue its present activities
on the lake (e.g., Sheriff's water Patrol and Public Works maintenance). The
report recommends growth for both activites, to meet expanding needs.
IV. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
The report recommends DNR continue its present activites but with closer
coordination with LMCD for certain activities (such as locating access sites).
DISCUSSION
I. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
From observation and meetings, Council staff can report LMCD activities toward
the recommendations as follows:
A. 1. LMCO has not convened "a meeting," as recommended, to date.
Meetings at both staff and policy level have occurred, for example:
- With DNR, to discuss funding for LMCD's planning proposal and
some discussion of its legislative initiatives.
- With SHRPD, to discuss preliminary aspects of the regional park
search which the district has begun and to encourage then to
proceed.
- With Council staff, to discus% this report and to provide
detail on legislative prograi. and planning fund needs.
2. LMCD has contracted with a consultant and received a final report from
a scoping study for the planning project for which LMCD is now seeking
funds. Definition and assignment of responsibilities are included in
the product from the planning study. LMCD utilized a lo:al planning
assistance loan from the Council, via the City of Shorewood, to carry
out the scoping study, at approximately S15,OCO cost.
B. 1. LMCD has continued its licensing and regulating responsibilities for
marinas and docks without change.
r
2, LMCD has prepared a 13-point legislative program (attached), submitted
it to the revisor's office and secured a draft bill (attached). They
are in the process of review of the draft and intend to make several
clarifying changes before trying to introduce the bill.
An explanation is in order for the way LMCD says legislative program
item 4 and sec. 3(n) of the draft bill should be construed. The
language says that "all research" on the lake calls for notification
of LMCD. LMCD interprets this to mean "whenever any division of state
government begins any activity on the lake, LMCD is to be notified."
Thus, if DNR begins a search for a new access site, if the Minnehaha
Creek Watershed District prepares to set a new regulation, or if a
municipality proposes a ne+. ordinance or development which will affect
lake surface use, LMCD must be noti first. It is not clear if
"review and comment," or "review an .,;vrove" are intended by this
proposal. Interpreted this way, the Dill evidently seeks some
increase in the coordinating and review ability of LMCD, which is
consistent with the report recommendations. Clarifying language is
needed.
C. The draft bill addresses funding for increased activity by LMCD (and other
lake agencies).
1. It calls for separation of the LMCD levy from the statutory levy limit
of each member municipality. This is identical to the report recom-
mendation.
2. It calls for a lake use permit and would assign the revenues from
permit fees to meeting lake management costs. A Lake Minnetonka ..,e
permit is not consistent with the task force recommendations. A size-
able minority of `:►+e task force were willing to endorse the concept
but the majority felt the idea was not supportable. LMCD's position
is that it is the only realistic source of earmarked funds they have
been able to develop. DNR does not support the lake permit concept.
LMCD has also been informed that DNR will not support a general
boat license fee increase in 87-88.
D. LMCD has discussed increases and applications of revenue from boating/water
safety funds with DNR. DNR will call for an increase in these funds in the
coming biennium. It is not clear if any of the increase would :o.+e to LMCD
for its use.
E. The legislative program calls for LMCD to be authorized as an owner -
operator of access facilities on Lake Minnetonka. The recommendation is
not inconsistent with the report, though the charge is not included per se.
F. LMCD has approved a motion of support for the park concept. A copy of tie
minutes are attached (Attachment 8). Further, LMCD members have lent
individual support at SHRPD.
II. Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District
SHRPD has begun a park planning process. A series of public meetings, con-
ducted in November and December, showed support for a Lake Minnetonka parK,
inrl•;ding a boat access and access for the nor -boating public. If all proceeds
as scheduled, a draft master plan could be ready by rebruary 1987.
As part of the process leading to a Lake Minnetonka Regional Park, the Council
has approved a separate special entry in its FY 1988-89 legislative request for
S6 million to begin acquisition and development of the regional facility.
III. Hennepin County
The county approved a 1987 budget with an increase for the Sher•riff's Water
Patrol which, for the first time since 1976 cuts, contains a level of support
higher than the 1975 entry.
The county's budget for lake maintenance by Public Work, did not fare as well.
It was sat at approximately 50 percent of its 1986 level. This is not
automatically a reduction on Lake Minnetonka because the budget is for county-
wide activity. However, since the majority of the county's expenditures are
normall, made on Minnetonka, reduced activity is a highly probable conseoijence
of the reduction.
IV. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
DNR activity with regard to the launch site at r;;ig's Point has ceased by
injunction pending court action, anticipated t* take place by April 1987.
DNR regional staff have met rith SHRPD and have stated support for the Lake
Minnetonka Regional Park co-cept. Although not stated, staff assumes this
includes support for the legislative funding request.
DNR has met with LMCD and made clear their intent to seek increaeed boating/
water safety fens;, which presumably would increase support for enforcement and
education or? Lake Minnetonka. As noted elsewhere, DNR has stated
that aril; not suucort a lake use permit fee for Lake Minnetonka and will not
seek increased b-et fees in the 1987-88 legislative session. DNR has
encouraged LMOD i- :gyp-ly for grants for special boating safety educational
programs where qr.r ; i f :aa.
CONCLUSIONS
I. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Has LMCO proceeded appropriately, so as to obviate the need for a "more
directive procedure," as per the Cou,Mcil's task force report?
PRO - LMCD has:
1. Considered and initiated some actions, legislative and otherwise, which are
clearly intended to result in a more powerful and potentially more pro-
active body. Especially if LMCD's construction of the "research" clause is
kept in mind, new powers to coordinate and review are in the legislation
sought.
Z. Sought expanded funding from a modified levy, increased boating safety
`ends and a lake rase permit to support the activities on Lake Minnetonka
with which it is concerned.
V
3. Conducted a scoping study to prepare for its management plan task and made
clear an intent to proceed with the planning task as soon as funds are
available.
CON - LMCD has not:
1. Convened a meeting leading towards the "memorandum of understanding",
although it has met individually with several agencies for part of the
considerations in the scope of that document.
2. Begun other specific work tasks which the report identified. Admittedly,
staff limitations are a major contributing factor in this point.
Staff concludes that LMCD has put several important things into motion which
should be allowed to work themselves out before the judgment can really be made.
Specifically, the following should occur:
1. The legislation to be introduced by LMCD must be clarified to identify the
powers sought and LMCD should begin the process of informing all concerned
agencies and governmental bodie! to obtain their support for the desired
changes. The list should begin with lake municipalities, Hennepin and
Carver Counties, lake concerned agencies --local, regional and state, Metro-
politan Council and the Hennepin County legislative delegation. The
process should continue beyond this list.
2. LMCD should get underway immediately with meetings leading to a memo of
understanding, rather than postponing it to part of a future lake use
planning process. The cost and complexity of this process is not beyond
the current capability of LMCD.
3 .W11 should begin work on those specific work tasks from the report
which it can carry out without new resources. For example, a survey of
Lakeshore zoning to identify those areas where public access facilities are
not prohibited must be done with cooperation of the municipalities in any
event.
II. Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District
SHRPD is proceeding with a regional park master plan.
III. Hennepin County
Hennepin County has provided expanded support for the Sheriff's Water Patrol
but budgeted a decreased public works lake maintenance item, which will most
probably result in less maintenance on Lake Minnetonka in 1987.
IV. Department of Natural Resources
DNR has met with agencies with whom it works on the lake and has stated its
intent for a legislative program providing some support to actions on the lake.
11
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. That the Metropolitan Council conclude that Lake Minnetonka Conservation
District has begun some activities which, if carried to fruition, would
avert the need for a more directive procedure and therefore, recommend no
immediate changes in the makeup of LMCD except as may become apparent as
more specific legislative and funding proposals develop.
2. That the Metropolitan Council revisit the subject in January 1988 and
direct staff to remain in touch with developing events in the interim.
SA4291-PHOPNI
ATTACHMENT 8
'♦L tll l NNE r0�* .
v 7
e N e
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
V4 t10N 0�9
402 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 5539t TELEPHONE E121473-7033
FRANK MIKA. EKECVTIVE DMIEC1011
BOARDMEMURS
October 29, 1987
Robert Rescop,Chairman
Shorewood
JOEllen Hurt. Vice Chairman
Orono
Wally Clevenger. Secretary
Mlnnerrivia
Mark Weellund. T/eaaurer
WayLale
Marvin Blorlin
Tonks Bay
Jan BOawinkel
Minnetonk■ Beach
diehard J. Gerwood
Denphaven
�-eler Hill
Victoria
Ron Kraemer
Subj i Lake Minnetonka Management
Plan RFP
Spring Perk
alchard Nelson
Greenwood
Robert K. Pillsbury
The LMCD Board of Directors at
its regular meeting October
Minnetonka
Reese
28, 1987 approved the enclosed
PP
Request for Proposal (RFP)
q P
Thomas W
Mound
for the development of a comprehensive management plan for
Robert E. Slocum
Woodland
Lake Minnetonka.
Carl H. Weisser
Encelsior
Also please find a copy of the scope study done last year
intended to give direction to, but not necessarily to limit,
your proposal. The scope study has been modified. Addendum
I establishes a three year program for the study to allow
adequate time for any seasonal research necessary, as well
as for balancing the financial burden over the term of the
contract. Addendum II provides for additional emphasis on
wetlands protection and fishery management, requested by the
MDNR.
Proposals will be accepted until 4 p.m. , ,P-Ad--X 7
1987. Should you have further questions, please contact me
at (612) 473-7033. Thank you for your interest in Lake
Minnetonka's management plan.
Sincerely,
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
or i► it>/4�t
---<
Frank Mixa
Executive Director
jm
enc: RFP, Scope Study
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
ATTACHMENT C
LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM
C
LMCD Legislation
1. The District should receive authority to set fees and require permits
for watercraft use of Lake Minnetonka to support Lake -related programs.
2. The District should request authority to assess a property owner to
recover costs for removal of dilapidated docks, boats, other structures,
or fallen trees from the Lake.
3. The District should have review authority for any research or other
project having Lake impact.
4. The District should request that its authority be extended to provide
for planning, funding, acquisition, development, ownership and operation
of lauching facilities and other means of public access to the Lake.
S. The District should request per diem and expense allowances for Board
members.
6. The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District levy should be exempted from
municipal tax levy limitations.
Other Legislation
7. The District should receive boating safety funds for planning, research
and regulation.
8. All agencies and political subdivisions of the state should be required
to notify the District prior to conducting research on Lake Minnetonka
and to keep the District informed about the progress and results of
such research.
9. The District should request that both boating safety funds and their
allocations to high activity areas be increased by the legislature.
10. The District should request that boating safety and other state and
county funds allocated to the Water Patrol be increased and distributed
by usage and activity to support an expanded program.
11. The District should request that Lake maintenance funding for the county
be supported from boating safety or from other special funds established
by the state and county, and be increased.
12. The District should request regional funding for public access facilities.
13. The District should request that the boat registration procedure should
be updated, be made more efficient, and that license fees should be
increased.
11-13-8i
Loan Hisnetoaka Conservation Dlstricc
SOM AXT OF NXIMEPAL aiSPOt1SIS TO LSCD EXCISLTTR PSOMAM
L M C D L a A i r l a t l o a
1
2
3
♦
S
6
Revive
Operate
Inert
Levy
Matercratt
Assessment
Agency
Access
Number
Outside
Perdu■
Assdmmac
Pre lecta
Facilities
Compensated
Lilt
Deepaaves
Coscoocaal
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approval
tau lsior
Approved
Greenueed
De reopen"
Do response
go reeponee
No response
r response
go response
Minnetonka
rid car
1&t.Plas())
rid for
M4t.plan(1)
gold t�
m6c.plas„)
rid for
14t.Plau(l)
sold for
%t.PI u(t)
gold few
r4t.pla(1)
Mimnetenks Mace
Approved
Approved
Appraved
Approved
Approved
Appr*wd
Mismacrtsts
Now"»
rM
I
»50-(2)
Oroeo(6)(7)
»
w(2)
Overlap(3)
Approvs(S)
Approved
'
Shorewood")
Spring Park
Took& Rey
2
"(2)
Approved
Avg roved/i
Approved
I
Victoria
ae response
So reopens*
No response
r response
r rseponse
go reopen"
Yeyt&ta
Approved
I
I
Approved
I
Ante*ed
we" iand
Approved
Approved
'
Approved
fot&1s: Approve/
Not Opposed -
Opposed
12(1) - 2
13(2) - 1
12(3)(4) - 2
12(5)(7)- 2
10 - ♦
11 - 3
*Mt Lesislactve ?rearm. with corraepaadia/ sonhors, is printed as reverse side.
0 t►• r
Lea / s tat Lon
7
S 9
10 11
12
13
Be" tat
Increase
Increase Isersame
public
update
Safety
Labe Area
•.P. County
Access
ReSiocracia
►wb
Research, Funds
Weds Funds
►uadLea
System
Approved
Approved y►rea+d
Approved Approved
Approved
Approved
go response r response go resposee
go response
In reopen" No raepess* go response
rid fag gold Nun) gold f!<)
ltjc.Flau Ifft.Plon 116t.Plon
rId Nc)
1)it.Plon
gold for rtd togold far
11Dt.plon s1sc.Plaa Mac.Plau
Approvd Approved Appa+vmd
Approved
Apprwed Approved Approved
I r
Approved '
go rages" as respses NO response go reapanse NO response r response NO re*paw
Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved
(')Reid for G+rehoasive "GOOD *et Ptah (S)Mseda clarification of LiD/o a pin Parke authority
(2)►tve cities want "SO ft" rumored (a)"**" secbority Mtw/U CD defined
())Moods clarification of overlap/city (2)reda enforcement city/tam o"C"
(♦)Yascc 'Approved* Remus (D)Appr- building and property dauntless
(p)gomda prior approval of ippesced mmsicipmlity
12 - 29- 72
14-0 14-0 14-0 14-0 1•- 0 13- 1 14-0
n
N
LI1%I%L. IV II VIVL I \J IV I\I. I'IV PA I IV I, 60IJ I I -)IV 1
ATTACHMENT 0
TO Robert Rascop
FROM: F. Mixa
DATE: December 4, 1987
SUBJ. LMCD Information and Inter -agency Referral Services
You have asked me for a listing of the types of inter -agency and other informa-
tional referral services that the District provides to assist the public in
obtaining proper sources of needed information and service. The following is
a listing of the different agencies and services on which we have received
inquiries and have made) referrals to proper agencies, or possible referrals,
including agency department, name, and phone numbers
1. D.N.R. - Permits, enforcement
2. M.C.W.D. - Permits
3. Hennepin Parks - Recreation
Y.C.A. - Pollution
S. Municipalities - Permits, zoning
6. Metro - Council
- Sewer
7. Hennepin County - Lake Maintenance
S. Sheriff's Water Patrol - Enforcement, safety
9. Hennepin Soil and Water Conservation District - Conservation projects
10. Aeronautics Division, MaDoT - Seaplanes
11. COE - Permits
12. Gray F.W.B.I. - Water quality research
13. Freshwater Foundation - Fresh water funding
14. C.G.A. - Escort, boating courses
15. U.S.P.S. - Escort, boating courses
16. Lake Historical Societies - Lake history activity
17. White BeaT Lake Conse-,ration District - General
18. Chamber of Co%=erce - General data
19. Minnesota Tourism - General data
20. Yacht Clubs, boat clubs - General data _
21. Lake business services (bait, docks, dredging, riprap, contractors, fishing
guides, charters, weed control, etc.
22. Other: where known, or if unknown, refer to several possible related sources
Cover copies of other lists are attached.
att
Cm Q com
AM
P9W E. BEINORN"
CM AnNDn3I M1TW
i. MA! 1"7 - 36 APKTL 19M
187 SRO - 1987 Council Strategic Planning
Short Term objective
188 STO - 1988 Short Term Objective
AREA GORL ARE* f87BLTiV�S
1. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT'
Highway 12
187 SRO A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment 12
(5/87)
Approve Amerklment 02
Submission to net Council
Receive back from Met Council
B. Task Force to upgrade
Zoning Amendments
- Draft
- Planning Ccmissicn
consideration
- Caucil consideration
Negotiations an utilities
(Long lake -Medina)
Final plan approval
Monitor progress
*88 SiO C. Corridor Selection Study Determine if appropriate
to undertake
Meeting of interested
parties
DRAFT 4/28/87
6/01/87
7/01/87
8/19/87
9/09/87
10/96/87
11/03/87
12/97/87
12/30/87 (Incorporating 1988 S'PJ)
01/30/88
5/11/87 Tabled to 6/22/87
Adopted 6/22/87
6/12/87 Received Metro CoxinciI I!
9/11/87 Response due 2/15
Extension to 4/15 granted to
Metro taste
6/5,/87
Currently being drafted
7/6/87
8/10/87
carmence
5/15/87
9/28/87
ongoing
9/2/87 meeting held Orono School/
MnDOT
10/9/87 staff/MrDct staff meeting
Re: Corridor selection process
2/28/88
1/25/88 Council reviewed prelim
progress established 2/29/88 meeting
2/29/88
t
AREA c7O L AREX CBJHL`lIDRTM sunm
1. CCMMUNM DEVEMPMIEN" cant.
187 S^_n0 Navarre Redevelopment
(Com.r_nce 2/87) Generate broader interest 6/30/87 10/29/87 businesses met or Cty 15
improvements/discussed possible
renovation
Initiate Goal/objective
7/19/87
Setting process
Engage consultants
to be determined
- Planning
- Legal
188 S'lp
Consider HRA formation
2/15/88
Solicite ideas/proposals
Commence
3/9/88
187 S'IC County -5 Levelopment
(commence 2/8'1)
Determine desired
6/30/87
Issue of lighting to 2/22/88
local accompanying
Council meeting
improvements
Determine/Budget
8/28/87
Council presentation 10/26/87 to
for local share
present initial reco mendatirr s
11/23/87
Review final plans
10/30/87
Further discussion 11,23 81
Adapted final plans
Agreement to 1/14 88
Financing plan
Conceptual approval 12 14 %67
Commence construction
5/1/88
187 SM Community Transportation Plan
Develop rsA capital program
12/87
Initial information presented
188 SM
12/14/87
Develop bridge replacement
12/87
Continued analysis Public/Private
Ongoing
Evaluate Cty 116
As needed
187 SM Storm hater Management
�B8 SM Plan
Adoption of
9/l/87
M WD plan reviewed by staff
Minnnehaha Creek
suggestions submitted 5./21.'87
crater Shed Plan
mcwD meeting 7/22/87 reviewed
by MICD
changes
MCWD meeting 8/12/87 adopted
i0/1/87 received revised copy of
,Uu-:) comments due 12/12/87
Develop schedule for
3/11/88
r)rcnc's plan
ARM GaRL AID►
1. CormN Ty DEVEwma r cant.
'88 STO
Caron Dev - Direction and progress
2. EWIRONKEWML PRMTVrION
'87 S7U Stubbs Hay
'88 STO
!(
11(
!»TIM DRTW SMIUS
Review advisors/Policy bodies 1/88
role/Responsibilities
Complete needs assesseent 2/88 Anticipate needs assessment
completion 2/88
Tentatively scheduled fc,.
2/22/88 meetiN
Project feasibility -commence
3/88
Determine assessment area
3/88
interest
Financing options
6/88
Consider development moratorium
5/88
If APprcpriate
- Initiate project
8/88
- Project bid
10/88
- Commence project
3/89
- Assess project
8/89
- Complete project
19/89
C
AREA GORL AM
OBJflC7TVES
oR70
S'DlIM
2. DMIROV4E'PPAL PROTECTION (Cant.)
Crystal Bay
Finalize project
7/87
Project close art table-i to
6/8/87
Wayne appeal tentatively settled
t29/87 Finalized 8/24/87
C" t 6/8/87
Solid waste Management
Assess recycling efforts to goal
3/88
Assess other avenues to meet goals 4/88
Review regulations regarding
4/88
solid waste
If appropriate explore organized
4/88
collection
3. ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
1988 Ccwcil Goal Setting
Commence
7/87
10/1/87 meting trld
Complete
10/87
Adopted es revised 11/9/87
1988 Budget Process
Assessment Board of Review
5-6/87
Completed 5/13/87
Budget pracess educa':ion
6-7/87
Held 7/9/87
Initial Meeting Set 9/17.'P-
Budget Adoption
9/28/87
Budget.Mill levy set 9/28/87
1988 Legislative Program
Complete
12/87
Adapted 11!9/8'
'87 STO Complete liquor sale
Close final payment
6/30/87
Sale closing completed 6,11/87
Completed final seller transaction 6/11/87
Final pric-e
OPS Stat>ment/Bcrwa 6/23/87
187 STO Increase Influence/Cooperation
Determine areas for
5/67
Draft document to Council
with other governmental units
cooperttion/influence
6/22/87 11'87
improvement
l
Determine goals in areas of
6/87
'opted 7/28/87
common coroern
t
Reevaluate use of
Outline of Current
7/87
Planning Commission
Commission responsibilities
t
(Moved to Item #I)
Proposals for any
8,18-1
increased usage
l
AREA (7]►L APER
4. SERVICE DELIVERY
187 STO Facilities Study
'88 STO
187 S O Long Range Financial Policy
(5/87)
5. IMMAN RFSOU14 FS
6. MARKE7TING
Golf Course
Animal Control
Appointment of consultant
for space study
5/87
Completion of Phase I space study 12/87
Determine alt.rnatives/Phase II 1/88
l>PterninatiT of next steps
3/88
in process
Implement any recaanendation
5/88
Draft policy to Council
61'87
Council adoption
7/87
Development of luusiness
787
strategy
Evaluate program
°'87
Coupensation Comparable north adjustments
Development - Performance
Based pay system
Community Information/ Mayor's Articles
Newsletter
Evaluation Of system
Tabled to 6/22/87
Tabled to 7/13/87
Council Approved Undertaking Study
8,/ 10/87
Consultant Selected 8/24/87
Mork plan adopted 9//28/87
Mork session held 12/7/87
1/26'88 Phase I campleteu
4,87 Initiated CSO program to handle
9/28/87 adopted continuance in 1988
budget. Extended service to Long
lake/Spring Park/Mirv*-,Cnka Beach-1989
10/8-1 12/7/87 work session held
12/14/87 187 adjustments made
10/87 Formal plan tc 2,'88
ongoing
8./8"' 8/24/87 evaluation Conducted.
Mayors's Article format to cr."inae
to 8/88 for next evaluati-n
rk
C!,UHCIL MEETING
Ll:FEC - 81988,T OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL ,'OR MEETING OF February 8, 1988 0TY OF QROW
Solicitor's Licenso - Discount Flowers
Route 2, Box 223
Col —to, IAN 55321
Cigarette Licen sk.,. - G?- --nt R. Wenkstern
February through Lzikeviow Golf
October 1988 ,)5 North Arm Drive
Resid`ntial Kennel License - Frank Yusup
2220 French Creek Circle
Michael & M.ar ' 'ic,kard
4607 Watert-
Maxwell E. Alv,-
900 North Brown Road
Pobert S. Waag
4760 West Branch Road
Frank & Sue Kokesh-,
4100 Watert goad
19-8 Joint Use Dock pies - Walters Part Maintenance &
Improvement Association
Forest Arms Country Club Additiot,
Homeowners Association, Inc.
San_ty Beach Shores
Phode/L'nlov./Lindahl
Ndvarre Cove Homeowners Association
Foxhill Homeowners Association
Vicc-,,.a Estates Homeowners Association
Minn,et.Onka Power :squadron
Lit rose No.
AFPLiCATION FOR SOLICITATION - $20.00 fee Date
Date
CITY OF ORONO
1335 BROWN ROAD SOUTH
BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323
Organizati - a e w t Phone
Address:
Representative: Phone
Address:
Received
Expires
Check One: uusiness solicitation i— Contribution
Number of People Solicitating within the City 91
-- -r --rrr
t 1 IL L.'JU
fI I I ' : !OC w
Solicitation vAl
Provide list of Names of Solicitors on back of this application.
Type of Product to be solicited
PERMIT E'PIRES 60 DAYS FROM APPROVAL DATE. POLICE CHIEF SHALL HAVE FIVE (5)
BUSINESS DAYS IN WHICH TO INVESTIGATE AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION PURSUANT TO ORONO
MUNICIPAL CC DE SECTION 5.30 SUBD 5(a).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON SOLICITORS
Subd. 3. Prohibited Solicitation Prar.tices.
A. It is unlawful for any solicitor to engage in solicitation for any
unlawful business or organizational purpose or activity.
B. It is unlawful for any solicitor to practice harassment, nuisance,
*.heft, deceit, or menaci-g, troublesome or otherwise unlawful activities during
thy` course of solicitation.
C. It i unlawful for any solicitor to enter, or attempt to gain entrance, to
residential pi emises displaying at such entrance a sign w= z the words "Peddlers
and Solicitors Prohibited" or "Solicitors Prohibited".
D. It is unit wful for any solicitor to refuse to leave business premises when
re ested by the owner, leasee, (,r person in charge thereof.
. It is unlawful for any person to engage :,n contribution solicitet ,n
ut completion of licensing or registration as herein provided.
F. It is unlawul for any ; -son to engage ..less solicitation without a
license as herein provided.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- -
The i 'e.-signed hereby agrees to the condi�-ions quoted above from tht Orono
Municipal Code and any additional requ11emer:s the City staff may have.
Signature of Ap,:iican• �ll Date:
--------------------- ------------------- 5---------------- --- ------
FORCITYUSEONLY: After review of application, staff recommends the followincy;
r / ^ Approval of application Denial of application
Signature of City Official: Date:
t
SijaAture of police Chief: Date:
CITY 01.1 OROW
Ct'.YSTAI. LAY, MINNESOTA S5;1;
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
Plione : 473-7358
APPLICATIOV FOR TO SELL CIGARETTES AT RETAIL
( Captor 62, Orono Municipal Code)
1. Name of Applicant
Arldrass 710,4�
2. Sales Location:
1988
r LdZ.,.'e,,1sItAr
Pnonc
, Lakeview Golf of Orono, Inc. f�-
Address 405 North Arm Drive Phone ��� 3 q-
3. Pr ^c:pal business carried on at this location
4. Method of Sales: Vending; Machine .:r Cotintar Other
I Hereby make application for license to sell
thu above location sttb jcct to the laws of the
the; ordinances of the Villas,;: of Orono dtirinp,
periods:
Feu -Mar -Apr
,May -June: -July
<.Aug -Sept -Oct
.Nov -Dec -Jan
Make remittance payable to
Signature of
Action:
cigarettes at retail at
State of Minnesota and
Vic following quarterly
LICENSE FEES
Expiration date of lie, nsc Jan. 31 `' C.
each year. Annual lic nsc fee is
$20.00. ;Vhcrc applicr.olc, as in the
case of seasonal sales, this may be - -.
pro-ratcA by quat•ters, at $5.00 per
quarter.
City of Or
applicant
Dated
For Offica Ilse
Ovner :
KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION
Effective March 1, 1981 to February�2�,
A,JK 1kf
L�; U �.
JAN 2 �� We
1982
Property Address: ^o ,� U % ,PL�i�C H OR E7- K C
(include city and zip)
Mailing Address (if different):__
Phone: ( home) r% - g 3 f ( work)
RESIDENTI" Kennel License Information: $25.00/year C: TY G; C A'OO
( payment must accompany application) G rlar
Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time: A�4 V'U1t}'JO '
( over 6 months of age) G''
I
'cry• riZ ..:"�1. 00
Ln
Principal Breed:_ LAICS, i!!i- Y i1 e
Purpose f nr more than 2 dogs: _ r 1_�"� 5-�-► V' 1- r 0"21 D C-14' �" oc '� !
/ UA, C l�
Dogs normally kept: inside �, kennel structure
CO MCIAL Kennel License Information: $150/year
(payment must accompany application)
Name of Business:
Business Activities:
(example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.)
Normal Business Hours:
After Hours Contacts (name)
(phone)
Dog runs/exercise areas are: inside outside both
The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a
Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that
a ::cnnel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to
violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the
undersigend hereby grants the City permisss!.on to inspect the premises
prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the
license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements'
of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by
the City Council as part of any kennel license approval.
I
Applicant i Date
-----------------•----------------------------------------------------------
_For City Use On_y I"I , .1^
Kennel lnspecte by ���_t `YjQ,r\ Date(���
Recommends Approval \ Der;al
F c� 21988 ;I
KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION I
Effective March 1, 198E to February, V
Owner:
Property Address:
„
(include city and zip)
Mailing Address (if different):
Phone: ( home ) (work )---I,,2 `{ ,.S/ 90 RL4r-2)
T'
RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Information: $25.00/year
(payment must accompany application)
Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one times_
(over 6 months of age)
Principal Breed: C e S f S% I- -
l Y CF ORONO
Purpose fnr more than 2 dogs: j�'� S r" ,',:=„'4f OFFICE
1i11UPtiV"'000
Dogs normally kept: inside kennel structure 1r,f `if,� � .4C
COMMERCIAL Kennel License Information: $150/year
(payment must accompany application)
Name of Business:
ACLr, T n= r1/�
L IA TL LNt V{%
;ScCE ��'T-►tt�;rlt YOU
90551 YO CON M TH".' 1 1
Tf YN.f
Business Activities:
(example: boarding, brooding, veterinary care, retail, etc.I
Normal Business Hours:
After Hours Contact: (name)
(phone)
Dog runs/exercise areas are: inside outside both
The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a
Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that
a kennel license is pe.-missive only and does not grant any authority to
violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the
undersigend hereby grants the City permisssion to inspect the premises
prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the
license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements'
of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by
the City Council as part of any kennel license approval.
r�
A6pl cant pate'
------------------------ --- --------------------
��
For City Use Onl
Kennel i nspecte by .��/` � Lei --- Date
Recommends Approval IDenial
KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION
Effective March 1, 198,t" to February LL,
Owner:
Property Address: c�
(include city arm zip
Mailing Address (if different):
Phone: (home) �Z21- J-'OL a- I (work)
RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Information: $25.00/year
(payment must accompany application)
Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time:
(over 6 months of age)
Principal Breed:
S5 S6
v
Purpose f-+r more than 2 dogs: P 9 : f Y ;;F OreW
Dogs normally kept: inside l- ennel structure r'r SCE GrFICE
1.�118vYG00 �!
COMMCIAL Kennel License Information: $150/year 01 rEN 25.O
( payment must accompany application) CHECK TL 2,5.00
Name of Business s ''FCSIPT-TNANK YOU t
CG'CI k01 Ti4:18j
Eusiness Activities:
(example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.)
Normal Business Hours:
After Hours Contacts (name)
(phone)
Dog runs/exercise areas are: inside . outside both
The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a
Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that
a kennel license is permissive only and goes not grant any authority to
violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the
undersigend hereby grants the City permisssion to inspect the premises
prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the
license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements
of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by
the City Council as part of any kennel license approval.
h�-
Applica,nt Dat
---------------------------y------------------------------------------------
For City Use Only
Kenner inspected by Date x
Recommends ApprovalDenial
KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION
Effective March 1, 1982 to Februarys'_.
Owner:
Property Address:
(include city and zip
Oo
rn-I✓nl
7(�C- [E0WR n
JAN 2 6
198i
Mailing Address (if different): J 197r
Phone: (home)_ r% _ �� (work) -
RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Information: $25.00/year
(payment must accompany application)
Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time:__
(over 6 months of age)
Principal Breed:
r
Purpose fnr more than 2 dogs:
Dogs normally kept: Y inside kennel
COMKERCIAL Kennel License Information: $150/year
(payment must accompany application)
Name of Business:
i Z; i r iJi\vii�
7 11�f•I�LV L' 1
1 r'L 11I 1'�'VY
r
structure
Business Activities:
(example: boarding, reeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.)
Normal Business hours:
After Hours Contact: (name)
(phone
Dog runs/exercise areas are: inside outside both
The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a
Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that
a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to
violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the
undersigeed hereby grants the City permisssion to inspect the premises
prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the
license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements
of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special con�itions imposed by
the City Council as part of any kennel license approval.
4 '
Applicant Date
For City Use Only---------�-^---/,----1------------�--,-(------------------
Kennel inspected by �% LI 1- Date � � �)
if
Pecommends Approval_._ Denial_
21988 111 ' � JM 2 9 !988
RENNE bXPLICA'14
�U
Effective
Marc kIL98 to Fe 'fir ,
Owner:��j� tV Ntsv—
Property Address: M
(include city and zip)
c,
Mailing Address (if different):
Phone: (home) & (work)
RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Information: $25.00/year
(payment must accompany application)
Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time:
(over 6 months of age)
Principal Breed:
W�,S'ej)I
Purpose fnr more than 2 dogs: Q Z4 n J
It
Dogs normally kept: _fe,-*"inside kennel structure
COMMERCIAL Kennel License Information: $150/year
(payment must accompany application)
Name of Business:
Business Activities:
(example: boarding,breeding, veter nar care, retail, et
P 9Y crrc
1 1l�11ltL� t�t•1 14L
Normal the s Hours: 17:1ui', k
After Hours Contact: ( name) + r A rL -r
(phone) --'7'T_ .:y.,;j� '!TV
Dog runs/exercise areas are: inside outside ti• =i ;VA �t. A
The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a
Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that
a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to
violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the
undersigend hereby grants the City permisssion to inspect the premises
prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the
license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements'
of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imlosed by
the City Council as part of any kennel license approval.
Applicant Date
--------------------------------------- -------------------
For City Use Only // ,
Kennel inspected by .h c: ;1�,�.i-� Date
Recommends Approval__ Denial
To: Mayor Grabek and Orono Council Members
City Administrator Bernhardson
From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator
Date: February 2, 1988
Subject: 1988 Joint Use Dock Licenses
Since 1963, the City of Orono ordinances have required the annual
licensing of joint use lake facilities. The following applications for
1988 joint use dock licenses have been received with the appropriate fees:
A) WALTERS PORT MAINTENANCE 6 IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION
Kelly Avenue and Walters Port Lane
Charles Garrity
B) FOREST ARMS COUNTRY CLUB ADDITION HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Forest Arms Country Club Addition
8 Thomas J. Theisen
C) SANDY BEACH SHORES
3995 North Shore Drive
% H. W •hard Zuckman
D) RHODE/ENLOW/LINDAHL
3155 North Shore Drive
% Jack F. Rhode
E) NAVARRE COVE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
2497-2503 Kelly Avenue
8 Thomas Dahl
F) FOXHILL HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
Heritage Lane at Shoreline Drive
% Owen A. Parr
G) VICTORIA ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
560 North Arm Drive
% Thomas D. Mazer
H) MINNETONKA POWER SQUADRON
Big Island, Record Lot No. 5
8 William F. Kelly
Attached please find a map showing the location of each of these Joint
Use Docks. We have had no complaints on any of these joint use docks. All
joint dock users of record have made 1988 applications, except for the Big
Island Veterans Camp which is discussed later in this memo.
1988 Joint Use Dock Licenses
February 2, 1988
Page 2 of 3
You will recall that each of the joint use docks in Orono is a
relatively unique situation. In 3 cases (Navarre Cove, Walter's Port, and
Victoria Estates), the joint use dock serves multiple riparian properties
via a single dock for aesthetics, convenience, and as a control on the
number of boats given the physical limitations of the shoreline. In 3
ogler cases (Foxhill, Forest Arms and Phode/Enlow/Lindahl) the joint use
dock serves specific non -riparian properties historically granted rights to
use of the lakeshore as a result of past City Council actions. Sandy Beach
is a single dock serving a number of rental cabins at this former -resort -
turned -residential. Finally, the Minnetonka Power Squadron is a
recreational non-profit organ4zation wit'.a joint use docks benefitting their
membership by providing short-term access to recreational shore facilities.
Big Island Veterans Camp -
Regarding the Big Island Veterans Camp, historically they have filed a
joint use dock license application. They were last granted a joint use
dock license in 1986. In May of 1986, the City Council granted the
Veterans Camp a conditional use permit per City Council Resolution #1988,
which permitted overnight camping of work crews involved In the clean up of
the Veterans Camp from May 15, 1986 through September 1, 1986. That
conditional use permit limited the Veterans Camp to two permanent slips at
the existing dock for the overnight mooring of two camp -owned boats.
During 1987, discussions ensued as to the ultimate magnitude of use of the
Veterans Camp property, and the camp was not opened for public use. No
1987 joint use dock license was applied for nor_ issued. In 1988, given
that by conditional use permit t`. Veterans Camp is limited to two
permanent slips for private use of the two camp boats, staff feels the
Veterans Camp does not _'it the typical joint use dock pattern or usage
intensity as historically administered in other situations. The Veterans
Camp also does not fit the mold of a commercial business of docking,
mooring or storing boats, although, t'iere is the potential for a future
camp operation that will charge veterans, their families and veterans
groups a fe 11 -- the privilege of using the recreational facilities of
the island, hencL: re is some questions whether the ultimate use of the
Veterans Camp is a ]oint use or a marina use. Staff has advised the
Veterans Camp board to hold off filing an application until their
conditional use permit for 1988 has been finalized.
Minnetonka Power Squadron -
Staff would note that the Minnetonka Power Squadron failed to apply
for a license in 1987, but has made the proper application for 1988. Staff
would request Council direction on whether or not to pursue the 1987
license or fee. Staff recommends that the 1988 license be retroactive to
January 1, 1987 but oe hela until payment of $110.00 1987 license fee and
$25.00 late fee is received.
'988 ,joint Use r,ock Licenses
February 2, 1988
Page 3 of 3
Victoria Estates Homeowners Association -
Also note that the Victoria Estates Association has applied for their
normal 5-slip density but has alluded to "6-12 boats" in their application
form, apparently based upon the L.M.C.D.'s new formula for computing their
annual license fees, which assigns "watercraft storage units" based on slip
lengths. This in no way affects Orono's limit of 6 boats for Victoria
Estates, and, according to Frank Mixa, does not allow them to have 12 boats
under L.M.C.D.'s license, but does allow them the 6 boats for which they
have been historically licensed. (Staff will point this out to the
applicant.)
Attached please find the 1988 license applicatio-; and a proposed
resolution for approval of each of the eight joint uses listed above.
Staff recommends approval of 1988 joint use dock licenses for each of the
eight applicants.
PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by , seconded by , to approve the 198' Joint
Use Dock Licenses for Walters Port Maintenance & Improvement Association,
Forest Arms Country Club Addition Homeowners Association, Inc., Sandy Beach
Shores, Rhode/Enlow/Lindahl, Navarre Cove Homeowners Association, Foxhill
Homeowners Association, and Victoria Estates Homeowners Association per the
attached resolutions. Ayes nays
PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by seconded by to aopro,,e a 1987-1988
Joint Use Dock License for the Minnetonka Power Squadron conditioned on
receipt of their 1987 license fee of $110.00 plus $25.00 late fee as
required in the fee schedule. Ayes , nays __
4 --
i-..........
MKE'MiSTA
I '
t
NO
M e+L O.
1200 v tam
RIP
.-.� �.
24Ck� — - -
y ei yen ARk
CAW� OW
,•
Vp ly
_ ..
32M
A "00 4� - "�OoE28w Fz4wG MWh*w
VILLAGE OF ORONO
74.040 Issuance of License. The
ORDINANCE NO. 54
Coum•il may seek advice of the
An Ordinance to Add to the Mu-
Planning Commis -inn rcg;,rrling
nicipal Codes a Chapter Dealing
issuance of any such license, and
With Joint Use of Lake Facilities.
'rhe
may restrict the joint use in such
Village Council of the Vil-
manner as it deems necessary to
Inge of Orono Ordains as fol-
protect the health and welfare of
lows:
Section 1. Chapter 74 is hereby
the Village from over -burdening
added to the Municipal Code to
the lake or lake shore at any
particular spot, having in mind
read as follows:
bong other things) parking
"74. JOINT USE OF LAKE
and traffic problems; safety re -
FACILITIES
FACILITIES
74.010. License Required. No
for docking, mooring
group or association of persons
and swimming; contamination of
the lake lake shore
or families, more than two in
or or any
parts thereof; and the common
number, whether incorporated or
right to use of the lake for boat
n
not, shall make any arrangement,
traffic of all kinds. Each license,
whether through a common or
when issued, shall contain a
corporate ownership or other-
statement of the restrictions and
wise, for the joint use of any lake
conditions imposed upon the
shore property for swimming,
joint use, and may require that
bathing, fishing, d o c k i n g or
such restrictions and conditions
mooring boats, or for any other
be conspicuously
p Y posted on the
purpose, without securing an an-
licensed premises. Any violation
nual license in accordance with
of the terms of the license shall
this Chapter.
be grounds for revocation.
74020 A»plication for License.
74.050. Ins
Inspection. The Village
Any person, or group or asso-
Council or its agent; may at any
ciation of persons or families,
time inspect the licensed prem-
whether incorporated or not, de-
ises to determine whether thev
siring such license shall apply
are being used strictly in accord -
therefor to the Village CouneLL
with the terms of the ]f-
t
Such application shall be in writ-
ons
tense.
c it appears that they are
ing. signed by the applicant and
i
not being so used, the licenses
tiled with the Village Clerk. It
shall be notified in writing by
shall set forth the name and res-
the Village Clerk and given 10
idence of the applicant or appli-
days to bring the use into strict
cants, including the names and
compliance. Thereafter, if the
residences of all members of the
violation persists, the Village
association, whether incorporated
Council may revoke the license.
r not, and shall designate
74060. Violations. Any use of
which of said persons shall be
lake or lake shore in violation of
regarded as the "licensee" for
the terms of the license, or with -
purposes of this Chapter. It shall
out a license when one is re -
be accompanied by a certified
quired, or after expiration or re-
copy of the Articles of Incorpora-
vocation of a license, shall be a
tion and By-laws of any incorp-
violation of this Chapter. Any
orated association, or by a cer-
violation, in addition to penalty
tified copy of the By-laws or
imposed upon the licensee, may
agreement of joint use of any
be enjoined by the Village by
unincorporated association or
suit against the licensee and the
group of families. It shall also
association or group involved."
be accompanied by a sketch of
Section 2. Publication. This Or -
the proposed facilities, and a
dinance shall be published in the
statement outlining the manner,
Minnetonka Herald at Wayzata,
extent, and degree of joint use
Minnesota, and in the Minneton-
contemplated. The Clerk shall
ka Pilot at Mound. Minnesota,
present the application to the
and shall be effective immediate -
Village Council at its next regu-
ly upon such publication
lar meeting after the filing there-
Passed by the Village Council
of,
of the Village of Orono this 8th
74.030 License Fee: Duration.
day of July, 1963, by a vote of
Thr lv en%e roquin2d by the Chap-
four Yeas and no nays.
ter %hall rost $10 per year Each
H. R. Ross. Mayor
license shall expire on April I
Attest:
next following issuance, and
Donald J Roll, Clerk
Rhall not he pro -rated.
(7-18, '63)
§ 5.40
( SEC. 5.40. HOME OCCUPATIONS.
Subd. 1. License Required. It is unlawful for any
person to engage in, or carry -on, a home occupation, as that term
is defined in the Zoning Chapter of the City Code, without first
having obtained a license therefor from the City.
Subd. 2. Regulation. Licenses will only be issued if
the specific use is permitted or otherwise allowed by the Zoning
Chapter, and if all conditions set forth in said Chapter are fully
complied with.
SEC. 5.41. MACE.
Subd, 1. License Required. It is unlawful for any
person to sell or distribute, at wholesale or retail, the substance
commonly referred to as mace, without first having obtained a
license therefor from the City.
Subd. 2. Limitations.
A. Only persons who are duly authorized and
licensed Federal firearms dealers shall be licensed.
B. This Section shall not apply to official sales
to, or purchases from, the City Police Department.
SEC. 5.42. BUSINESS AND JOINT USE OF LAKE FACILITIES.
Subd. 1. Definitions. For the purpose of this Section,
the following terms have the meanings given them:
A. "Boat Slip, Water" means a structure, space,
dock or othof,thing designed or used for the docking, mooring or
storing of a boat temporarily or permanently in or on water,
including mooring posts, buoys or other devices.
B. "Boat Slip, Land" means a structure, space or
other thing designed or used for storing a boat temporarily or
permanently on land adjacent to a lake, whether it is located on or
off the licensed premises.
C. "Business of Docking, Mooring, or Storing Boats"
means renting or otherwise providing space, including boat buoys,
for docking, mooring or storing three or more boats helonging to
persons other than the owner or occupant of the property.
D. "Commercial Boat Dock Business" means providing
space for docking, mooring or storing boats for a fee, or boats
used in a trade or business, including, without limitation, provid-
ing rented spaces, boat buoys, space for keeping boats owned by the
licensee and held for sale, display, rental, or otherwise used in
connection with a boat or marina business, and space held for
(. dockinq of boats during_ or pending repairs or maintenance of said
boats.
ORONO CC 126 (4-1-94)
§ 5.42
E. "Commercial Docks" means docks, mooring spaces,
mooring posts, mooring buoys, or boat slips used in commercial boat
dock business or by one in the business of docking or storing boats
as defined herein, including all "els", "T's", mooring posts, or
any other structures related to the main dock.
* F. "Joint Use" means more than two persons joining
for the purpose of using lakeshore property for swimming, bathing,
fishing, docking or mooring boats, or for any other purpose.
G. "Business Use" means engaging in the business of
docking, mooring or storing boats, or a commercial boat dock
business.
Subd. 2. License Required. It is unlawful for any
person to engage or participate in business use or joint use
without first having obtained a license therefor from the City.
Subd. 3. Public Hearing. Upon filing of any application
for license the Council may call a hearing upon such notice as it
may deem appropriate. Provided, that no such hearing shall be
mandatory, but wholly within the discretion of the Council.
Subd. 4. Business Use Standards. All business use
applications shall provide information showing compliance with the
following standards:
A. The proposed number of boat slips on the land
and on the water and boat buoys shall not adversely affect the
public safety, health and welfare or infringe on the public right
to use the water, or unreasonably restrict the rights of other
property owners to store boats on or adjacent to the same area.
B. The proposed vehicular off-street parking
facilities shall be sufficient to eliminate any traffic or parting
congestion likely to be caused by the business of the applicant.
The parking areas need not be paved. The minimum parking
requirements shall be as follows:
1. Six parking spaces shall be provided for
each ten boat slips on water or on land.
2. At 'east eight off-street parking spaces,
plus one additional space :or each 800 square feet of floor area
over 1,000 feet, including warehousing, and all outside sales and
storage areas related to the sales and service functions.
3. If the proposed use is to include the
launching of boats owned by the public for the day from trailers,
ten additional auto -trailer parking spaces shall be provided for
each ramp.
4. The required parking spaces may not be
separated by a public roadway from the dock, storage space, mooring
space. floor space, or ramp they are designed to serve.
ORONO CC 127
CITY OF ORONO
P.O. BOX 36
CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323
473-7357
7
�,{
(association) J/J,4-c-7Ws �iC)r��
ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE APPLICATION
Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.42
LICENSE YEAR 19 c' .1
r ITr• "F nr.•n�/r
L- i l L' 1_1 „_•� V
FI A'AZE rc-arc
V: IL .ILL
fT1"M AMA
TL
�-r /milt j L _
Date Form Sent by City Staff-.5 , - -
Date Application Returned to City -�7 t`��� "' :•Yl� Ity1,oi i1
Fee Recived $ `;��By Employee
Section 5.42 Subdivision 2. LICENSE REQUIRED - It is unlawful for any
(group or association of persons or families, more than two in number,
whether incorporated or riot) to engage or participate in ... joint use
(of any lakeshore property) without first having obtained a liiense
therefor from the City.
PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED
ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY
FEBRUARY 1 OF THE LICENSE YEAR.
ASSOCIATION INFORMATION
1.
Association title or
name (if any)wAJ{kr%,
p TwMR�vE�"�4W1q,►v`t . AuN.
2.
Lake Mro tht-,
Bay
3. Person responsible for this application:
Name tirl f l F (z,+ Phone p - qy/- 7W b A - y 71- 86 r_
Mailing Address 7701 %ct//y _ i K c-e/%,(JlZ &/V ST 1
Relationsh t_ to association
Page 1 of 5
4. Aesoctntior. is (check arollicnb]e items):
x unincorlcrctcd horieor.-ner's grou_).
incorporated homeowner's Association.
unincorporated club or recreation group.
incorporated club or recreation group.
5. Princira l purpose of joint use dock is (check applicable items):
provide boat mooring and lake access for residential property.
provide swimming access, beach, or offshore dock.
provide a club -or association gethering place for activities.
6. Dock is lc.cated oa (check applicable item):
cue nember's private property.
'K easement or outlot owned in common.
_ property leesed by the group/association.
property owned by the group/essocietion.
7. List Dock location and o%mershi_p information:
street address P'�
legal property description
PZD #
listed property owners)
8. Names of abutting lakeshore property owners:
(North/West) C-01 GF dIU-..0 _
(Name + Address)
(South/East) Lou&I p-A,ns Z 7u Lowr,
(Name + Address)
Names of other affected property ^ors:
(Name + Address) (attact. sheet if necessary)
I:.£�.....:e Cr,versr;e - Tne join:3y v.sei 80:.. s e r� �n,s:r e by on. of the f _lo:ri
10
*A- ; :�o1>erty owner's �o:�ecti+ner's olicy. CActi•d,v,
_ sepnrate I;ro—pAssocintion owned :o_.icy.
list the followin^ info: r.n+;ion:
name of
insured
L +� _ A'v�,�i
Name of
insurance
carrier
name of
insurance
oj;er,cy
ICAr3Ak LA, + - jziL4,fr•I4.
policy
no. Ii "-!I,
effective date of coverage
S7
amc.unt
of coverage; i'ublic
liaLil`_:;;, p;r person, per occurence $
2�
Fubi:c
1'_ability, per occurence $
2 �
Security arid policing of the Ioirtl;,• used dock and property is provided b5
(check ePpliceble items):
_ fencing. security lighting. A property owner's presence.
_ contract securit.,, service. of'ner (specify)
DOCK IPFF RWiTIOW
11. List Dock Use Area Specifications: ti 51fE fJ, , let
Nidt.n of shoreline; ft. LenRti. of ma_r% dock from shore; ft.
Dock setLacks from side property lines at shore; ft. and ft.
12. Dock Construction (check applicable items):
seasonal dock (relocated or realace3 eac year).
_ r.ermenent piling with seasonal deck. 2 permanent piling and decr.in(-.
wooden decking. metal decking.
13. List Dock Acces£ories:
Number of fire extinguishers svri?e:':e et the doc oki, B'At
Nwr:ber of life preservers availst)le r t the .'Dck
14. List number of slips in eecl: et teCory ("sI ir.s" inciudee boat lifts):
Transient (day use onjy) slips Transient(dey use) off -shore buoys
Iermanent moorage slims S }ermnnent moorc.Fe off -shore buoys
Dry storage (rack) slits Maxiir.um number of beats at the deck 5
1�. List nur,'uer of off-street }parking spaces available for userr of the ,Joint use
docK. inrkint,, If ymvided must not be sepmrnted fmm the dock by sny public
pond. -Adi_ s.,,ces .
3 u f' S
EROSIO:t AN5) S*tTI1rn7.rATT0. CC-7. 1;01
16. Shoreline '.s protectcd by (ci:eck st,plicable itea:s):
Stone rfp rap. woud seawal _. p, rret82. seawall. � concrete sePwcll.
gross and vegetation only. other (specify)
17• Depth of water at shoreline i:. S ft; at 50 ft. uut is Jvd. ;
at 100 ft. out is Wk. .
REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this applicat__.n:
A. DOCK PLAN - ALL APPLICATIONS £vuIr . rs v
A dock plan, drawn to scale, showing the shoreline width of this property, the
side property lines and the location, layout and dimensions of all docks, slips
and buoys. If off-street parking, dry storage or other on -land functions are
intended, these also should be shown on the plan.
B. UNINCORPORATED GROUPS OR ASSOCIATIONS A4 4"c(]
1. A list of the names and mailing addresses of all members and/or slip users.
2. A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use. Note: This
copy is not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following
statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock is t-) be
operated under the same by-laws or agreement originally made in
(state year) and on file with the City."
Applicant's initials
C. INCORPORATED CLUBS OR ASSOCIATIONS
1. A list of thn names, mailing addzei.ses and titles of all corporation officers.
2. A statement as to the total number of mem�-�rs in the club or association.
members.
3. A certified copy of the articles of incorporation and by-laws of the corporation.
Note: These copies are not required if the applicant initials and certifies
the following statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock
is to be operated under the same articles of incorporation and/or by-laws as
originally made or last amended in (state year) and on file with the
City."
Applicant's initials
Pane 4 of 5
D. ANNUAL LICENSE FEE - ALL APPLICATIONS
Joint Use Dock License Application fee according to the current
City ;.'ee Schedule.
RENEWAL JOINT USE FEE, per year
PLUS SLIP FEE for each permanent
moorage slip, lift, dry stack,
or buoy _-slips @ $2.00 each
TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION
LATE FEE - Renewals
$ 20.00
$ 30, -
0y39-9y
Applications for renewal of licenses shall be made no later than
February 1 of the license year. The City shall not accept renewal
license applications received after February 1 unless the application
is accompanied by a late fee of $25.00.
REVIEW PROCEDURE
When a complete application is received, the application will be
reviewed by the City Council and, in the case of new or unusual
applications, also by the Planning Commission and Marina Committee.
The Council will pass upon the application after c%mplete review.
THE SUBJECT DOCK MAY BE INSTALLED AND/OR OPENED " R USE ONLY UPON
APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant
hereby requests the Oro,.o City Council to review this Joint Use Dock
License Application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Oronc and
the City's employees and agents to enter upon the property at any
reasonable time to perform safety and code compliance inspections.
Signed Date__
LR o vTt_oT •3� 0 C_K Vti•y OUT —•-- - — •-=-------• -
Liu
i :SC.ALG:
I
0 uT�lT
CyISaTu %A. II
our�oT �
WALTER•S TORT (North),
subject to Order pf 4-25-64
1
1
All- . .
• LA &&R j
• •' - . _-••- -._..
- - -
- _
- - ...FAQ t_.oTI GL.
N d cis
S u► P 1
Lar
Z
y vm t o v. o`l
•
Z
t..oT
Z
OL Z
QAgT
OF tsn
N C %J O•'�'
__ F
2
to f- !,
DAv, yi,f UpL#4j
Z69q /Lily AVQ
y7/- 96" y
R1k z CA0,LfS. &/�rr.�Fy
�( 71
0
_r
t �o s
47/- 9SSt8
1k O-hv�j 7Rrrj
7 7/0 V%M �Arl- ejA LA -A
H7/-09ou
RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO
ISSUE A JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE
TO WALTER'S PORT MAINTENANCE i IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION
SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN
FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 1986 TO DECEKBER 31, 1988
WHEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafte.. City" is a
municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
State of Minnesota and has the authority and responsibility under
Minnesota Statutes, State Statute 412, et. seq. and State Statute 462,
et. seq., to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the
citizens of the City and other members of the public within the City;
and
WHEREAS, the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over the
primary harbor limit of the City of Orono with the Lake Minnetonka
Conservation District and the Department of Natural Resources of the
State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the regulation of the navigable waters involves an
exercise of police power of the State, LMCD, and the City of Orono,
all of which have adopted rules to ensure to all equal enjoyment of
the public rights and equal protection from activity on or near the
public waters and on the land within the City which, if unregulated,
may be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare;
and
WHEREAS, the regulations of the DNR, LMCD, and the City of
Orono regulate the property rights of the riparian owners both as to
residential owners and the commercial marina owners to the extent
prohibiLing any interference with the public waters adjoining their
property. The LMCD, DNR and City of Orono must fulfill their
trusteeship over the public waters by protecting against interference
by anyone, including those who assert the commonlaw rights of riparian
owners, whether or not they be commercial marinas or residential
owners;
WHEREAS, as to Lake Minnetonka, a mutual right of enjoyment
exists between and is shared by riparian own rs and the public
generally, no one riparian owner has exclusive privileges over Lake
Minnetonka. The only additional private right that any riparian owner
may have over the public generally is to construct one dock to the
navigable depth of the public waters. There can be no dispute but
that the public generally and ea(h riparian owner to Lake Minnetonka
has the right to use the entire surface area of Lake Minnetonka for
all suitable purposes in common with all other riparian owners. :his
right is a right not only to members of the pub 1i- but the right to
each riparian owner.
Pages 1 of 2
This mutual right of enjoyment which is shared by riparian owners and
the public generally includes the recreational benefits of the lake
such as boating and fishing therein; the riparian owner has no
exclusive privileges to these rights; and
WHEREAS, Lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial
beneficial public use only as long as all riparian users of the lake
are regulated in such a way as to ensure there is no abuse of the
limited riparian rights; and
WHEREAS, the City has adopted reasonable regulations
regarding the construction and use of lakeshare and dock facilities
when such facilities are used and maintained by three or more
families, which regulations include the annual licensing of Joint Use
Docks pursuant 11Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code- and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to set forth the
abov._ noted general conditions and concerns and the following special
con•:i'-ions as they relate to an application for an annual Joint Use
Dock License described on Exhibit A attached,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council :)f the
City of Orono hereby directs the Staff to issue a Joint Use Dock
License according to the facts and conditions noted on Exhibit A
attached.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono at their
meeting on the Oth day of February, 1988.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk
James R. Grabek, Mayor
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF ORONO
EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO.
CONDITIONS OF ISSUANCE FOR ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE
I. LICENSEE: Walter's Port Maintenance & Improvement Association
Dock Address: 2699/2701 Kelly Avenue
Agent: Charles E. Garrity
Address: 2701 Kelly Avenue, Excelsior, MN 55331
Licensee is: XX unincorporated homeowner's group
incorporated homeowner's association
unincorporated club or re-reation group
incorporated club or rect.—tion group
other
License Period - January 1, 1988 to December 31, 1988
II. BOAT DENSITY
The number of in -place boat slips, lifts and buoys shall not exceed
the number shown on the attached plan, Exhibit B, and in accordance
with Resolution 938, in no case shall the number of authorized boat
slips, lifts, or buoys exceed the number permitted in the prior year's
license.
Authorized Boat Density per attached plan:
Bay
Carman
Transient (Lay use only) Slips 0
Permanent Moorage Slips 5
Boat Lifts
0
Sub -Total: Slips at Dock 0
Offshore Buoys 0
Maximum Boats in Water 5
Maximum Boats per prior license 5
MAXIMUM BOAT DENSITY 5
Exhibit A
Resolution No.
Page 2
Exceeding this maximum boat density, or exceeding the number of
permitted slips, lifts or buoys is a violation of this license subject
to revocation and/or prosecution for violation of Section 5.42
Subdivision 2 of the Orono Municipal Code.
III. DOCK LAYOUT
The dock structure or layout authorized by this license shall be as
shown on attached Exhibit B. Any changes in this layout shall be
subject to prior review and approval of the City Council.
IV. SPECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinance of
the City and/or the LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to
full compliance with these conditions. Failure to comply with these
conditions is cause for license revocation and/or prosecution by the
City.
1. Variances granted for 1988:
a) West property line (extension of west line of Lot 2,
Block 2, Walter's Port) - 10' required, zero setback
proposed
b) Southeast property line (extension of southeast line of
Outlot 2, Walter's Port) - 10' required, zero setback
proposed
2. The five slips are approved for use by the following
properties located in the plat of Walter's Port:
Slip 1 - Lot 2, Block 2
Slip 2 - Lot 2, Block 2
Slip 3 - Lot 1, Block 2
Slip 4 - Lot 1, Block 1
Slip 5 - Lot 5, Block 3 (part of Lot 1, Carman Bay Heights)
3. City must be notified immediately of any change in use or
configuration of the dock.
4. All boats permanently moored at this joint use dock must be
registered to the applicant property owners.
5. Lot 5, Block 3 (part of Lot 1, Carman Bay Heights) is allowed
four boats maximum (1 of lagoon, 3 at outer lakeshore).
V. Nothing in this license shall confer upon any person for the
benefit of any property any vested right to use Lake Minnetonka or the
premises in a manner permitted by this resolution, but the use of Lake
Minnetonka and the premises shall remain subject to such regulations
and ordinances as the City and other competent regulatory authorities
shall deem necessary from time to time in the public interest.
RESOLUTION A
i L.A0.00 N 0oTt-oT 3, OLD% LRy OUT •-- -= =
'_ ____ a --� • • � RAP • �p
' �SaAcfr: t.lu:.
i
i1 R R A kE p LeT u l ISf/^
39o,Z� � 6utwZ- '
I�
doe t
y r
i /
i
�>`� 1
Zyo'
- WALTER'S PORT (North)i
subject to Order of 4-25-84
/gag - S c
L -
Ls yL& I
Lars
• OuT1.�T �
CAUoFi
' 2-
or
a
L Z
3
5
�oT
5
AL j
/9 P37 - S�
P a qT
o f %--art
c o. gr, N J eA.
CITY OF ORONO
P.O. BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323
473-7357
LICENSE YEAR 19 ga
(association) Ain S
Cl T # OF CffOW
FI %14WCE G: FICE
ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE APPLICATION
0Vr,-,AAAO
Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code
Section 5.42
VA &EN
4C;, ;)
CHECK' TL
4 ^.
fECEIF'T-
Date Form Sent by'City Staff -
���`�
,V0$" a"�5:,
Date Application Returned to City
!� '
Fee Recived $
By Employee
Section 5.42 Subdivision 2. LICENSE REQUIRED - It is unlawful for any
(group or association of persons or families, more than two in number,
whether incorporated or not) to engage or participate in... joint use
(of any lakeshore property) without first having obtained a license
therefor from the City.
PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED
ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY
FEBRUARY 1 OF THE LICENSE YEAR.
ASSOCIATION INFORMATION
1. A�grsociation t�}'tle or name
Rx*A60wMA.
X. j H oG. Tor .
e 2. Lak
(if
r.'
any) YpZz;sT 4x"S.�C�...�
3. Person respo. ole for this application:
Name414040'0�MA a Phone 41Z-70r9
Mailing Address t#)'j5 �k-T- IV- Z�� LL131 �,)1��_
Relationship to association S`
Page 1 of 5
4. Association. is (check anplicnble items):
unincorporotcd homeowner's group.
_el"incorooruted Homeowner's Association.
unincorporated club or recreation group.
incorporated club or recreation group.
5. Principal purpose of joint use dock is (check applicable items):
z"v'rovide boat mooring and lake access for residential property.
_Zprovide swimming ecccss, beach, or offshore dock.
-Zprovide a club -or esEocietion gethering plece for activities.
6. Dock is located on (check applicable item):
_ one member's private property.
easement or outlot owned in common.
property leased by the group/essociet:on.
_,,t,-p-roperty owned by the group/association.
7. List Dock location and ornership information:
street eddress
legal property description L,•rS 1 4 'L !'LQLb 3
PID /
listed property ovmer(s)
B. Names of abutting lakeshore property owners:
North/West
South/East)
Name + Address)
Name + Address
Names of other affected property owners:
/_
Name + Addrest) (attach sheet if necessary
2 cf 5
n Covers ill' - Tne jointly ;:.sea do.,k is insuree by ono. of t:je fc`'_:ovIr:�'
n:-oy,erty cvner's hori:ecvner's policy.
_Zreparate gm,_,.^/^ssocirtion owned _policy.
list the following inforination:
name of insured
Name of insurance carrier
name of insurance agency
policy no. D1041(6S effective date I f coverage 71Z.S&l
amount of coverage; Public liatil'_ty, per person, per occurence S �c�ijz
Public liability, l.er occurence $
10• Security and _policing of the jointly used dock and property is provided by
(check ePpl.icable items):
fencing. 1security lighting. property owner's presence.
contract security service. other (specify)
DOCK INFrOFMTION
11. List Dock Use Area Specifications:
Width of shoreline; 2 7�C� ft. Length of main dock from shore; 100 ft.
Dock setbacks from side property lines at shore; _7.0` ft. and _ _ ft.
12. Dock Construction (check applicable items):
_.,e-<easonal dock (relocated or replaced each year).
_ permanent piling with seescnel deck. _ permanent piling and decking.
.,�oden decking. _ metal decking.
13. List Dock Accessories:
Number of fire extinguishers eveileb':e at the dock
Number of life preservers availoble at the dock
14. List number of slips in each ceterory ("slims" includes boat lifts):
Transient (day use only) slips Transient(day use) off -shore buoys
Permanent moorage slips ' 4 Permanent morage off -shore buoys
Dry storage (rack) slips Maximum,, number of boats at the dock __1 4.
15. List number of off-street perking spaces available for users of the joint use
dock. }erking, 'f provided must not be separated from the dock by any public
mod. _lAs.)aces .
3 of S
Ei'OSION AND S,MIMENTATION C07ROL
16. Shoreline Is protected by (check ai,-pli ceble i tetf:s ) :
_stone rip rap. wud seaway_. _ metal. seawall. concrete seevell.
grass and vegetation only. other (specify) �Sa%a-.nh �a c 4l
17. Depth of water at shoreline is _) ft; at 50 ft. out is -5_;
at 100 ft. out is'-t'o, !P�
REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application:
A. DOCK PLAN - ALL APPLICATIONS
A dock plan, drawn to scale, showing the shoreline width of this property, the
side property lines and the location, layout and dimensions of all docks, slips
and buoys. If off-street parking, dry storage or other on -land functions are
intended, these also should be shown on the plan.
B. UNINCORPORATED GROUPS OR ASSOCIATIONS
1. A list of the names and mailing addresses of all members and/or slip users.
2. A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use. Note: This
copy is not required if the applicant initials and certifies tLe following
statement: "This is a aenewal application and our joint use dock is to be
operated under the same by-laws or agreement originally made in
(state year) and on file with the City."
Applicant's initials
C. INCORPORATED CLUBS OR ASSOCIATIONS
1. A list of the names, mailing addresses and titles of all corporation officers.
2. A statement as r the total number of members in the club or association.
members. r�"1 Ll��
3. A certified copy of the articles of incorporation and by-laws of the corporation.
Note: These copies are not required if the applicant initials and certifies
the following statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock
is to be operated under the same articles of incorporation and/or by-laws as
originally made or last amended in(state year) and on file with the
City."
Applicant's initials
Paae 4 of 5
D. ANNUAL LICENSE FEE - ALL APPLICATIONS
Joint Use Dock, License Application fee according to the current
City Fee Schedule.
RENEWAL JOINT USE FEE, per year
PLUS SLIP FEE for each permanent
moorage slip, lift, dry stack,
or buoy +14 slips Q $2.00 each
TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION
LATE FEE - Renewals
$ 20.00
$ Z$ e?
S Ab to -
Applications for rF�.nv wal of licenses shall be made no later than
February 1 of the 1i::-nse year. The City shall not accept renewal
license applicat..c%ty received after February 1 unless the application
is accompanied by late fee of $25.00.
REVIEW PROCEDURE
When a complete application is received, the application will be
reviewed by the City Council and, in the case of new or unusual
applications, also by the Planning Commission and Marina Committee.
The Council will pass upon the application after complete review.
THE SUBJECT DOCK MAY BE INSTALLED AND/OR OPENED FOR USE ONLY UPON
APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant
hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Joint Use Dock
License Application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and
the City's employees and agents to enter upon the property at any
reasonable dime to perforp safety and code compliance inspections.
Signed
Date / — 7 - F8 _
Pagr 5 of
�j . erJT 1 p►� IN�itS'sw: 411g sm GL
L crti s 1z o5
o z Cor 23
L o r Z¢
C 1 LOT'Z5
fr
' � a
RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO
ISSUE A JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE
TO FOREST ARMS COUNTRY CLUB ADDITION
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN
FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 1988 TO DECEMBER 31, 1988
WHEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafte "City" is a
municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
State of Minnesota and has the authority and responsibility under
Minnesota Statutes, State Statute 412, et. seq. and State Statute 462,
et. seq., to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the
citizens of the City and other members of the public within the City;
and
WHEREAS, the City shares corcurrent jurisdiction over the
primary harbor limit of the City of Orono with the Lake Minnetonka
Conservation District and the Department of Natural Resources of the
State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the regulation of the navigable waters involves an
exercise of police power of the State, LMCD, and the City of Orono,
all of which have adopted rules to ensure to all equal enjoyment of
the public rights and equal protection from activity on or near the
public waters and on the land within the City which, if unregulated,
may be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare;
and
WHEREAS, the regulations of the DNR, LMCD, and the City of
Orono regulate the property rights of the riparian owners both as to
residential owners and the commercial marina owners to the extent
prohibiting any interference with the public waters adjoining their
property. The LMCD, DNR and City of Orono must fulfill their
trusteeship over the public waters by protecting against interference
by anyone, including those who assert the commonlaw rights of riparian
owners, whether or not they be commercial marinas or residential
owners;
WHEREAS, as to Lake Minnetonka, a mutual right of enjoyment
exists between ana is shared by riparian owners and the public
generally, no one riparian owner has exclusive privileges over Lake
Minnetonka. The only additional private right that any riparian owner
may have over the public generally is to construct one dock to the
navigable depth of the public waters. There can be no dispute but
that the public generally and each riparian owner to Lake Minnetonka
has the right to use the entire surface area of Lake Minnetonka for
all suitable purposes in common with all other riparian owners. This
right is a right not only to members of the public but the right to
each riparian owner.
Page 1 of 2
This mutual right of enjoyment which is shared by riparian owners and
the public generally includes the recreational benefits of the lake
such as boating and fishing therein; the riparian owner has no
exclusive privileges to these rights; and
WHERRAS, Lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial
beneficial public use only as long as all riparian users of the lake
are regulated in such a way as to ensure there is no abuse of the
limited riparian rights; and
WHEREAS, the City has adopted reasonable regulations
regarding the construction and use of lakeshore and dock facilities
when such facilities are used and maintained by three or more
families, which regulations include the annual licensing of Joint Use
Docks pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to set forth the
above noted general conditions and concerns and the following special
conditions as they relate to an application for an annual Joint Use
Dock License described on Exhibit A attached,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the
City of Orono hereby directs the Staff to issue a Joint Use Dock
License according to the facts and conditions noted on Exhibit A
attached.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono at their
meeting on the 8zh day of February, 1988.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk
James R. Grabek, Mayor
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF ORONO
EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO.
CONDITIONS OF ISSUANCE FOR ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE
I. LICENSEE: Forest Arms Country Club Addition Homeowners
Association, Inc.
Dock Address: 4245 Forest Lake Drive
Agent: Thomas J. Thiesen
73dress: 4175 Forest Lake Drive, Mound, MN 55364
Licensee is:
unincorporated homeowner's group
XX incorporated homeowner's association
unincorporated club or recreation group
incorporated club or recreation group
other
License Period - January 1, 1988 to December 31, 1988
II. BOAT DENSITY
The number of in -place boat slips, lifts and buoys shall not exceed
the number shown on the attached plan, Exhibit B, and in accordance
with Resolution 938, in no case shall the number of authorized boat
slips, lifts, or '-)uoys exceed the number permitted in the prior year's
license.
Authorized Boat Density per attached plan:
Bay Forest Lake
Transient (Day use only) Slips -
Permanent Moorage Slips 14
Boat Lifts
Sub -Total: Slips at Dock 14
Offshore :3uoys -
Maximum Boats in Water 14
Maximum
Boats
per prior license
same
MAXIMUM
BOAT
DENSITY
14
Exhibit A
Resolution No.
Page 2
'xceeding this maximum boat density, or exceeding the number of
ermitted slips, lifts or buoys is a violation of this license subject
,o revocation and/or prosecution for violation of Section 5.42
--ibdi vision 2 of the Orono Municipal Code.
III. DOCK LAYOUT
The dock structure or layout authorized by this license shall be as
shown on attached Exhibit B. Any changes in this layout shall be
subject to prior review and approval of the City Council.
IV. SPECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinance of
the City and/or the LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to
full compliance with these conditions. Failure to comply with these
conditions is cause for license revocation and/or prosecution by the
'ity.
The Purchase Agreement by and between the City of Orono and the
Forest Arms Country Club Addition Homeowners Association, Inc.
will permit a maximum of 14 slips. The City will approve 14
slips for this license year based on the number of developed
interior lots within the subject plat.
V. Nothing in this license shall confer upon any person for the
benefit of any property any vested right to use Lake Minnetonka or the
premises in a manner permitted by this resolution, but the use of Lake
Minnetonka and the premises shall remain subject to such regulations
and ordinances as the City and other competent regulatory authorities
shall deem necessary from time to time in the public interest.
• N
r
I
I
I.
+- N
tn
DEC 2'1983
_ im.c.rr.�� ,_----
Z
S-41
REse� . No. —
/988 -ly D
CITY OF ORONO LICENSE YEAR 19 83e,)
P.O. BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323
473-7357
(association) 5 9 &-A -4 S;Woe�j
ANNUAI. JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE APPLICATION
Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.42
cl!>
Date Form Sent by City Staff
Date Application Returned to City
rr?V rr 'ir• AVI
EA r r ur
i•rwrt�•
Fee Recived $ 3 7 By Employee 7� _ :LF r,.44 rrtrr
n r,j r-•l : nr�
Section 5.42 Subdivision 2. LICENSE REQUIRED - It is urJaWf-Cr1 frjr any?::;, v
(group or association of persons or families, more than two_i,n-,TnyThgrvr,
whether incorporated or not) to engage or participate in..:j'dFin`t'tf W_
(of any lakeshore property) without first having obtained>:H•_ 1f,'ceii�h&-1
therefor from the City.
PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED
ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY
FEBRUARY 1 OF THE LICENSE YEAR.
ASSOCIATION INFORMATION
1. Association title or name (if any) ,chard Z�:ckman
2. Lake rnl �d _Bay Uj JA RrVy\
3. Person responsible for this application:
Name 11 &LV\ard ?-';C' 'r\arl Phone w 311-now
Mailing Address_15` 1_9 D ��}x"1 f't le Jp �pi�, m►� ! - 9Q
Relationship to association
Page 1 of 5
1a. AFisocintior. is (check an;ilicrble iterr.$):
unincori crotcd 7omeovner's grou!).
incorporated Homeowner's Association.
unincorporated club or recreation group.
incorporated club or recreation group.
5. Princira 1 purpose of joint use dock is (check e:•Dlicable items):
4 provide boat moorir,6 and lake access for residential property.
Lrovide swimmirW, access, beach, or offshore dock.
provide a club or association gathering place for activities.
6. Dock is located on (check applicable item):
pri•j-.te property.
easement or outlot curved in common.
property leesed by the group/essocietion.
property owned by the group/e.ssociation.
7. List Dock location and ounership information:
c+roo+. nAr?rPeR Qaa'� No C-,6z,(e Or -
legal property description )'j -111 ' �3 22 o0ol � j L-t
< <,, UJ C ),'5 N ,w. cww FIE. Wo . •,c et 2 361. 35.5' i4`s.S t'� w, c•r. f, -a � y h .S �C�o
P I D a W . d ��ws� C1 . `� . t✓`�' t).�".`
listed property owner(s)
8. Names of abutting lakeshore property owners:
(North/West) ��� _ 1-v- 140C< Nc S)-,x re
South/East)
Name + Address)
(Name + Address)
Names of other affected property owners:
(Name + Address) (attach sheet if necessary)
2 of 5
-' i:.�'.:'L. :e ccveI' t;e - T'.!e jointly .:.se.l (Q'... Is insur^G !-.i ono of t::C
property owner'shwmecwnerls policy.
cepnrate owned _o_icy.
=ist the followinc iz!'or:ra*ion:I
name of insured
Name of insurance carrier Vic'j &"M—L I
name of insurance agency
policy no. 38 ?)(11 � effective date of coverage
amount of coverage; Fublie liatil'_t;; , per rerson, per occurence $ 1, GOG, CC6
Public 1'_ability, Ler occurence $ 1a006006
10• Security and policing of the jointly use_ dock and rrorerty is provided by
(check enpliceble items):
fencing. Y security lighting. property owner's presence.
contract security service. other• (specify)
DOCK I!TMPME1TION
11. List Dock Use Area Specifications:
Hidt•n of shoreline; � f�. Lenzt} of main dock from shore; _ ft.
Dock setbacks from side property lines at shore; �_ ft. and ft.
12. Dock Construction (check applicable items):
seasonal dock (relocated or replaced each year).
— _rennanent piling w th seescnal deck. permanent piling and decking
x wooden decking. metal deckin.;.
13. List Dcck Accessories:
Number of fire extinguishers svnileble at the deck
Number of life preservers available et the dock G
14. List number of slips in each category ("Slips" includes boat lifts):
Transient (day use only) slips-. Transient(da;; use) off -shore buoys V
Permnent moorage sli;�s permanent moorcCe off-sh(>re buoys
Dry storage ( rack) slips �' Maximum number of boats at the deck
15. List number of off-street parking spaces available for users of the joint use
dock. lmrkine, If provided must not be se;jarr!ted from the dock t r any public
rur:d . s;,ecer. .
3 of 5
i OSIO: /:??7 S 'DII✓L�:,�"PATIO;I CC!,7'ROI
16. 'Aiurali ne 4.6 pro ;;ee ted by ( ci.eck ai-pil cable Items) :
stone r-1p rap. _ wood seawal.. _ mete]. seawall. ` concrete seeweil.
grass and vegetation only. other (specify) SL?rla b�k L) C
i
17. Depth of Water at shoreline is ft; at 50 ft. out is ;
at 100 ft. out is _LS�.
REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application:
A. DOCK. PLAN - ALL APPLICATIONS
A dock plan, drawn to scale, showing the shoreline width of this property, the
side property lines and the location, layout and dimensions of all docks, slips
and buoys. If off-street parking, dry storage or other on -land functions are
intended, these also should be shown on the plan.
B. UNINCORPORATED GROUPS OR ASSOCIATIONS
1. A list of the names and mailing addresses of all members and/or Fiip users.
2. A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use. Note: This
copy is not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following
statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock is to be
operated under the same by-laws or agreement originally made in
(state year) and on file with the City."
Applicant's initials
C. INCORPORATED CLUBS OR ASSOCIATIONS
1. A list of the names, mailing addresses and titles of all corporation officers.
2. A statement as to the total number of members in the club or association.
members.
3. A certified copy of the articles of incorporation and by-laws of the corporation.
Note: These copies are not required if the applicant initials and certifies
the followinq statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock
is to be operated under the same articles of incorporation and/or by-laws as
originally made or last amended in (state year) and on file with the
City."
Applicant's initials
Pane 4 cf 5
D. ANNUAL LICENSE FEE - ALL APPLICATIONS
Joint Use Dock License Application fee according to the current
City Fee Schedule.
RENEWAL JOINT USE FEE, per year $ 20.00
PLUS SLIP FEE for each permanent
moorage slip, lift, dry stack,
or buoy _slips @ $2.00 each $ ��'��`
TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $ 3.C6
LATE FEE - Renewals
Applications for renewal of licenses shall be made no later than
February 1 of the license year. The City shall not accept renewal
license ap lications received after February 1 unless the application
is accompanied by a late fee of $25.00.
REVIEW PROCEDURE
When a complete application is received, the application will be
reviewed by the City Council and, in the case of new or unusual
applications, also by the Planning Commission and Marina Committee.
The Council will pass upon the application after complete review.
THE SUBJECT DOCK MAY BE INSTALLED AND/OR OPENED FOR USE ONLY UPON
APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant
hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Joint Use Dock
License Application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and
the City's employees and agents to enter upon the properl-y at any
reasonable time to perform safety and code compliance inspections.
Signed ��� '1 Date__► (�U )
,or
I
I
I
I �
I
I I
I
I
: 1 =20'
35
Par ylnc�
Rrea
cars
RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO
ISSUE A JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE
TO SANDY BEACH PLACE
SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN
FOR THE PERIOD OF JANU1,RY 1, 1988 TO DECEMBER 31, 1988
WHEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafter "City" is a
municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
State of Minnesota and has the authority and responsibility under
Minnesota Statutes, State Statute 412, et. secs. and State Statute 462,
et. seq., to protect the health, safety, and general welfare or the
citizens of the City and other members of the public within the City;
and
WHEREAS, the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over the
primary harbor limit of the City of Orono with the Lake Minnetonka
Conservation District and the Department of Natural Resources of the
State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the regulation of the navigable waters involves an
exercise of police power of the State, LMCD, and the City of Orono,
all of which have adopted rules to ensure to all equal en, yment of
the public rights and equal protection from activity on or near the
public waters and on the land within the City which, if unregulated,
may be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare;
and
WHEREAS, the regulations of the DNR, LMCD, and the City of
Orono regulate the property rights of the riparian owners both as to
residential owners and the commercial marina owners to the extent
prohibiting any interference with the public waters adjoining their
property. The LMCD, DNR and City of Orono must fulfill their
trusteeship over the public waters by protecting against interference
by anyone, including those who assert the commonlaw rights of riparian
owners, whether or not they be commercial marinas or residential
owners;
WHEREAS, as to Lake Minnetonka, a mutual right of enjoyment
exists between and is shared by riparian owners and the public
generally, no one riparian owner has exclusive privileges over Lake
Minnetonka. The only additional private right that any riparian owner
may have over the public generally is to construct one dock to the
navigable depth of the public waters. There can be no dispute but
that the public generally and each riparian owner to Lake Minnetonka
has the right to use the entire surface area of Lake Minnetonka for
all suitable purposes in common with all other riparian owners. This
right is a right not only to members of the public f-ut the right to
each riparian owner.
Page 1 of 2
This mutual right of enjoyment which is shared by riparian owners and
the public generally includes the recreational benefits of the lake
such as boating and fishing therein; the riparian owner has no
exclusive T>r vileges to these rights; and
WHEREAS, Lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial
beneficial public use only as long as all riparian users of the lake
are regulated in such a way as to ensure there is no abuse of the
limited riparian rights; and
WHEREAS, the !'sty has adopted reasonable regulations
regarding the constructi ?nd use of lakeshore and dock facilities
when such facilities a used and maintained by three or more
families, which regulations include the annual licensing of Joint Use
Docks pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to set forth the
above noted general conditions and concerns and the following special
conditions as they relate to an appli^ation for an annual Joint Use
Dock License described on Exhibit A attached,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the
City of Orono hereby directs the Staff to issue a Joint Use Dock
License according to the facts and conditions noted on Exhibit A
attached.
Adopted by the City Council of the C of Orono at their
meeting or the 8th day of February, 1988.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk
James R. Grabek, Mayor
Page ? of 2
CITY OF ORONO
EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO.
CONDITIONS OF ISSUANCE FOR ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE
I. LICENSEE: Sandy Beach Place
Dock Address: 3995 North Shore Drive
Agent: H. Richard Zuckman
Address: 1819 Dupont Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55403
License Period - January 1, 1988 to December 31, 1988
II. BOAT DENSITY
The number of in -place boat slips, lifts and buoys shall not exceed
the number shown or the attached plan, :xhi.�it B, and in accordance
with Resolution 938, in no case shall the number of authorized boat
slips, lifts, of buoys k.xceed the number permitted in the prior year's
license.
Authorized Boat Density per attached plan:
Bay West Arm
Trans? en* (Ca; .sf: only) Slips 0
Permanent 7
Boat Lifts 0
Sub -Total: Slips at Dock 7
Offshore Buoys C
Maximum Boats in Water 7
Maximum
Boats
per prior license
MAXIMUM
BOAT
DENSITY
7
Exhibit A
Resolution No.
Page 2
Exceeding this maximum boat density, or exceeding the number of
permitted slips, lifts or buoys is a violation of this license subject
to revocation and/or prosecution for violation of Section 5.42
Subdivision 2 of the Orono Municipal Code.
III. DOCK LAYOUT
The dock structure or layout authorized by this license shall be as
shown on attached Exhibit B. Any changes in this layout shall be
subject to prior review and approval of the City Council.
IV. SPECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinance of
the City and/or the LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to
full compliance with these conditions. Failure to comply with these
conditions is cause for license revocation and/or prosecution by the
City.
1. The seven approved slips are for the exclusive use of the
residents/rc.iters of Sandy Beach Shores.
2. e4ty may require written approval from abutting and affected
prererty owners for each annual license review.
. Nothing in this license shall confer upon any person for the
benefit of any property any vested right to use Lake Minnetonka or the
premises in a manner permitted by this resolution, but the use of Lake
Minne', nka and the premises shall remain subject to such regulations
and .-.minces as the City and other competent regulatory authorities
shall deem necessary from time to time in the public interest.
0
I /
F,xRi tr 8
P-eSo,Lu--"or-J /JO ,
x
Mb
..►�OiZ�L/N�
�. �� • 7Q
-7�
1989 -70
, C i-E : I'' =20'
CITY OF ORONO
P.O. BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323
473-7357
association)
ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE APPLICATION
Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.42
LICENSE YEAR 19�
Date Form Sent by City Staff ` g�
Date Application Returned to City �- sJ �,` -77-r!r�
Fee Recived $ e By Employee
i1'1 I•l.t
i L L \ L
Section 5.42 Subdivision 2. LICENSE REQUIRED - It is unlawful -for. -any-;,
(group or association of persons or families, more than two-"in.nuir a ;_ ,
whether incorporated or not) to engage or participate in.. -.Joint -use
(of any lakeshore property) without f irst having obtained a lic.ense"l./d %:98
therefor from the City.
PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED
ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY
FEBRUARY 1 OF THE LICENSE YEAR.
A., _, _ LAi!ON INFORMATION
1. Association title or name (if any) / UG-
2. Lake /�,/Y?2�i7C✓.!Y Bay
3. Person responsible for 'this application:
Name 7 /� �c�i�l/!,- Phone
Ma it in,g Address
Relationship to associatior.
Page 1 of 5
4. Association. is (check armlicnb]e iterrs):
unircori%rrctcd homeotirer's grou_).
incorporated Homeowner's Association.
unincorporated club or recreation group.
incorporated club or recreation group.
5. Princii-al, purpose of jcint use dock is (check applicable items):
provide boat mooring and lake access for residential property.
provide swimming access, beach, or offshore dock.
provide a club -or association gathering place for activities. 1
6. Dock is located on (check applicable item):
I
crie member's nrivate property.
I
easement or outlot ovmed in common.
property leased by the group/essocietion.
_ property owned by the group/essocietion.
? List Dock location and o%mershi_p information:
street eddresg
legal .property description
P I D # 7-23
listed property owner(s) 2 t! f /�
8. Names of abutting lakeshore property owners:
CNo r t� west) 4'
(Name + Address)
((Soul/Fast)CC o CC�C� �•�Y� ,�/6f /fieYtT�%�y1E'/�z
(Name + Address)
Names of other affected property owners:
(Name + Address) (attach sheet if necessary) % ,"fry /
2 of' 5
rover°,mil' - T:!e j!:;in;.',y ,:.sed C10:.. iG �n�ur ' r , fe tiy on
c- t..c
cuner's ^o;j:ecw+er's-+Kr?fC;^.ld(�lc1675
r•e►.r+rate ;;Yu-!: /e!aoeir!'.ion owned _.olic•y.
as the following information:
r,e496:' -3J
name of insured_S yi✓d�3i�G
Name of insurance carrier
name of insurance agency ESN-�YIG(�CiyCE` �ci�YC i�
policy no. effective date of coverage
amount of coverage; Public lie il_t;;, per person, per occurence $,3G�(Jf
Fytb che i].it der occurenc $ 3.�
J �% 0'
u�Lf� U`Z'L/� �UC
10• Security and policing o= joint sec dor_k an roverty is rarovided by
(check enpliceble items):
_ fencing. security Lighting. property ovmer's presence.
_ contract security service. c7-,_,r (specify)
DOCK IPiFOFcMATTON
11• List 'Jock Use Area Specificatiuns:
Width of shoreline; ISO f'z. LenKt�: of main doc;t from shore; �G--�f� ft.
Dock setbacks from side property lines at shore; ft•. and �%C/ f _ ft.
12. Dock Construction (check applicable items):
X seasonal dock (relocated or replaced each year).
permanent piling with seasonal deck. permanent piling and decking.
X wooden decking. metal decking.
13. List Dock Accessories:
Number of fire extinguishers eveilebe at the dock
Number of life preservers available et the dock /0 f
19• List number of slips in each ceteCory ("slips" includes boat lifts):
Transient (day use only) slips Transient(dry use) off -shore buoys
Iermanent .,00rage slips 3 Iermanent moorsge off -shore buoys
Dry storege (rack) slips Maximum number of boats at the dock
15. List number of off-street parkIrg spaces available for users of the joint u��e
- dock. Yarkine,, 4f provided must not be se_arnted from the dock, by any public
ro(:d . n s,)oces .
7 p I' r,
Er.US10:: +^;� S :DIb��:'vU TTON C( :r7LF0J
16. Shoralj ne ; s prG ;;ec ted by (&.ecV a --iiij cable i te%s) :
stone ri>) rsh. Wood seawal .. met8l serivall. _ concrete sevwE!11.
grass and vegetation only. other (specify)
17. Depth of water at shoreline is (0 ft; at 50 ft. out is ;
a;. 100 ft. out is �
REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application:
A. DOCK PLAN - ALL APPLICATIONS
A dock plan, drawn to scale, showing the shoreline width of this property, the
side property lines and the location, layout and dimensions of all docks, slips
and buoys. If off-street parking, dry storage or other on -land functions are
intended, these also should be shown on the plan.
B. UNINCORPORATED GROUPS OR ASSOCIATIONS E 7✓C!/![J '
1. A list of the names and mailing addresses of all members and/or slip users.
2. A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use. Note: This
copy is not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following
statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock is to be
operated under the same by-laws or agreement iginally made in
(state year) and on file with the City." 11j�
Applicant's initials
C. INCORPORATED CLUBS OR ASSOCIATIONS
1. A list of the names, mailing addresses and titles of all corporation officers.
2. A statement as to the total number of members in the club or association.
members.
3. A certified copy of the articles of incorporation and by-laws of the corporation.
Note: These copies are not required if the applicant init-'a's and certifies
the following statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock
is to be operated under the same articles of incorporation ana/or by-laws as
originally made or last amended in (state year) and on file with the
City."
Applicant's initials
Paae 4 of 5
D. ANNUAL LICENSE FEE - ALL APPLICATIONS
Joint Use Dock License Application fee according to the current
City Fee Schedule.
RENEWAL JOINT USE FEE, per year
PLUS SLIP FEE for each permanent
moorage slip, lift, dry stack,
or buoy 3_slips 0 $2.00 each
TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION
LATE FEE - Renewals
$ 20.00
Applications for renewal of licenses shall be made no later than
February 1 of the license year. The City shall not accept renewal
license applications received after February 1 unless the application
is accompanied by a late fee of $25.00.
REVIEW PROCEDURE
When a complete application is received, the application will be
reviewed by the City Council and, in the case of new or unusual
applications, also by the Planning Commission and Marina Committee.
The Council will pass upon the application after complete review.
THE SUBJECT DOCK MAY BE INSTALLED AND/OR OPENED FOR USE ONLY UPON
APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant
hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Joint Use Dock
License Application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and
the City's employees and agents to enter upon the property at any
reasonable time to perform safety and code compliance inspections.
SignedDate�!��lo:%
1
Pagf, 5 of 5
�Xff-i�tlT ,g
f98(o 3 s��Ps
RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO
ISSUE A JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE
TO THE OWNERS OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT
3155 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, 3185 NORTH SHORE DRIVE,
AND 1406 BOHN'S POINT ROAD
SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN
FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 1988 TO DECEMBER 31, 1988
WHEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafter "City" is a
municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of *-.he
State of Minnesota and has the authority and responsibility under
Minnesota Statutes, State Statute 412, et. seq. and State Statute 462,
et. seq., to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the
citizens of the City and other members of the public within the City;
and
WHEREAS, the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over the
primary harbor limit of the City of Orono with the Lake Minnetonka
Conservation District and the Department of Natural Resources of the
State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the regulation of the navigable waters involves an
exercise of police power of the State, LMCD, and the City of Orono,
all of which have adopted rules to ensure to a l l equal enjoyment of
the public rights and equal protection from a^tivity on or near the
public waters and on the land within the City which, if unregulated,
may be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare;
and
WHEREAS, the regulations of the DNR, LMCD, and the City of
Orono regulate the property rights of the riparian owners both as to
residential owners and the commercial marina owners to the extent
prohibiting any interference with the public waters adjoining their
property. The LMCD, DNR and City of Orono must fulfill their
trusteeship over the public waters by protecting against interference
by anyone, including those who assert the commonlaw rights of riF_cian
owners, whether or not they be commercial marinas or residential
owners;
WHEREAS, as to Lake Minnetonka, a mutual right of enjoymF.-:
exists between and is shared by riparian owners and the public
generally, no one riparian owner has exclusive privileges over Lake
Minnetonka. The only additional private right that any riparian owner
may have over the public generally is to construct one dock to the
navigable depth of the public waters. There can be no dispute but
that the public generally and each riparian owner to Lake Minnetonka
has the right to use the entire surface area of Lake Minnetonka for
all suitable purposes in common with all other riparian owners. This
right is a right not only to members of the public but the right to
each riparian. owner.
Page I of 2
This mutual right of enjoyment which is shared by riparian owners and
the public generally includes the recreational benefits of the lake
such as boating and fishing therein; the riparian owner has no
exclusive privileges to these rights; and
WHEREAS, Lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial
beneficial public use only as long as all riparian users of the lake
are regulated in such a way as to ensure there is no abuse of the
limited riparian rights; and
WHEREAS, the City has adopted reasonable regulations
regarding the construction and use of lakeshore and dock facilities
when such facilities are used and maintained by three or more
families, which regulations include the annual licensing of Joint Use
Docks pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Cede; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to set forth the
above noted general conditions and concerns ane the following special
conditions as they relate to an application for ao anni-Al Joint Use
Dock License described on Exhibit A attached,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the
City of Orono hereby directs the Staff to issue a Joint Use Dock
License according to the facts and conditions noted on Exhibit A
attached.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono at their
meeting on the 8th day of February, 1988.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk
James R. Grabek, Mayoi
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF ORONO
EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO.
CONDITIONS OF ISSUANCE FOR ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE
I. LICENSEE: Property owners of 3155 North Shore Drive, 3185 North
Shore Drive and 1406 Bohn's Point Road
Jock Address: 3155 North Shore Drive
Agent: Jack F. Rhode
Address: 3155 North Shore Drive, Wayzata, MN 55391
Licensee is: XX _ unincorporated homeowner's group
incorporated homeowner's association
unincorporated club or recreation group
incorporated club or recreation group
other
License Period - January 1, 1988 to December 31, 1988
II. BOAT DENSITY
The number of in -place boat slips, lifts and buoys shall. not exceed
the number shown on the attached plan, Exhibit B, and in accordance
with Resolution 938, in no case shall the number of authorized boat
slips, lifts, or buoys exceed the number permitted in the prior year's
license.
Authorized Boat Density per attached plan:
Bay
Crvstal
Transient (Day use only) Slips 0
Permanent Moorage Slips 3
Boat Lifts 0
Sub -Total: Slips at Dock 3
Offshore Buoys
L
Maximum Boats in Water 3
Maximum
Boats
per prior license
3
MAXIMUM
BOAT
DENSITY
3
Exii;.L i t A
Renolzltion No.
P ige
Exceeding this maximum boat density, or exceeding the number of
permitted slips, lifts or buoys is a violation of ':his license subject
to revocation and/or prosecution for violation of Section 5.42
Subdivisj : n 2 c,f the Orono Municipal Code.
III. uUCF s :': OUT
The avck structure ur layout authorized by this license shall be as
shown on attached Exhibit B. Any changes in this layc7it shall be
subject to prior review and approval of the City Council.
IV. SPECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinance of
the City and/or the LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to
full compliance with thane r 'itions. Failure to comply with these
conditions is cause for 1. revocation and/or prosecution by the
City.
Phis license is gra.ite�, subject to the findings and conditions
SEA forth in Resolution 11212 r,+ the City ^ouncil, summarized as
tc _lows:
a) The thi:ee properties to which this Joint Use Dock License is
granted are described as follows:
i. (P.I.D. #C 7-23 3: 0001) "That part Of Gov-t Lot 1
lying East of .he West 4 2.33 feet thereof and North of the
South 1058.3 feet thereof and South of Registered Land
Survey No. 269" (3155 North Sh-,re Drive)
ii. (:.I.D. #00-l17-23 33 0015) "Tract I and the West 28.5
feet of Tract H, Registered Land Survey No. 269" (1406
Bohn's Point Road)
iii, (P.I.!). #09-117-23 33 0016) "Tract G and t` 3t part of
Tract4 lyiliq East of the West 28.5 feet thereof, :?egisre.Lad
Lanu ._,rvey No. 269" (3185 North Shore Drive)
b) There sh:,11 be only one deck allowed on the Rhode lot k P.I.D.
09-117-23 33 0001) which dock shall be no great, than 100 feet
iri length, and which dock must be constructed it accordance with
all applicable City and LMCD ordinances, and which dock is
in -ended to serve only the owners and their successors of the 3
properties described in a) above.
cI On tiie Rhode let (P.I.D. 09-117-23 33 0001) either attached
to the Bock, moored in front of the log_ ,r located on the lot,
the->e miy rot at any time more than three r.atercraft, as
de. nea by the Lk, : either docked, moored, r st.o:ed.
Exhibit A
Resolution No.
Page 3
d) The three watercraft allowed may be owned only by the owners
of the properties decribed in a) above.
V. Nothi-,;g in this license shall confer upon any person for the
benefit of any property any vested right to use Lake Minnetonka or the
premises in a manner permitted by this resolution, but the use of Lake
Minnetonka and the premises shall remain subject to such regulations
and ordinances as the City and other competent regulatory authorities
shall deem necessary from time to time in the public interest.
pc,soj..
/I S(O -a st-1Ps
swes
F1
CITY OF ORONO
P.O. BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY,
413-7357
(association
adcEMFELA
N 5532391986
II J�
M
LICENSE YEAR 19 RE,
ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE APPLICATION
Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.42 �;; VI I � V117
tC ITA,%rE Lr.1f IC
Date Form Sent by City Staff g )
/ nn
Date Application Returned to City ";ZZ AA
T,
. v t•
Fee Recived $ �, By Employee'����
\ rIL lL It 1 ,tint., •Vtl
f ve�F a J\ r7 sl rr, :1 ri^f {
L •. t.'1 't"A .L •L
Section 5.42 Subdivision 2. LICENSE REQUIRED - It is unlawful for
(group or association of persons or families, more than two in number; •"
whether incorporated or not) to engage or participate in ... joint use
(of any lakeshore property) without first having obtained a license
therefor from the City.
PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED
ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY
FEBRUARY 1 OF THE LICENSE YEAR.
ASSOCIATION INFORMATION
1. Association title or name
2. Like ��M° tit�fC/f
(if any)
Bay
1¢�1wr
C
C '7'e' S
e
3. Person responsible for this application
I
Name Phone_
Mailing Address_ e-ill
l/�l�llC s� A'U
Relationship to association �7(%yI S s.."f
w/'-
.
Page 1 of 5
Association. is (check 3riplicnb]e items):
unircori%(-,ratcd horeovner's L;rou ).
incorporated Homeowner's Association.
unincorporated club or recreation group.
incorporated club or recreation broup.
5. Principal purpose of joint use dock is (check eT:plicable iteme):
Yprovide boat mooring and ?ake access for residential property.
provide swintiTinw, access, beach, or offshore dock.
urovide a club or association gathering place for activities.
6. Dock is located on (check applicable item):
one r^ember's nrivate property.
easement or outlot oxned in coiranon.
property lensed by the group/association.
x property owned by the gro,-p/e.ssocietion.
7. List Dock location and ounershi_ information: ��
street eddress ,-W%' , 1 c'-� "�'-l�l!/ A�Y.
legal .property descr! ation !/c ���11 �� � ����� l W�-
P I D # 2,1j i� %—�.z3 — iL r1*,y.7
listed i ronert.,,, cwner(s)
8. Names of abuttin lakeshore property owners:
W)rth/West) �i4,✓�Pc_ J
(Name + Address)
Anse.;
South/East) llr' �f/lN {� _ ?�/`� (! 101fI
(Name + Addre )
Names of other affocted property owners:
�-,, 1,f4�
(Name + Ad re s) (attach sheet if'necessary)
T't-e ,L'n:;Y J.se3 Bock is insurcr. lt.v On C'.` t:.c fo'..]oui%:
-):Ll;ert.y cwner's hor,:ecurner's policy.
ce!,trate grukInAssoci.etion coned ::ol icy.
:_ist the following ip!'urmation: ,
name of insured ail 072
:tame of insurance carrier
r
name of insurance aiLeer.cy If e -
policy no. OV.. `'J f � IMeCr4 effective date of coverage q111O
amount of coverage; Fublic lieLil_t;;, par person, per occurence 5 3?r, <nf'
Fublic lf-ability, Ler occurence $ Jr, «"e,
10• Securi't,y and rolicing o, the Jointly uses dock and property is 1:rovided b)
(check applicable items):
fencing. security liL7,bting. property owner's presence.
contract security service. other (specify)
DOCK IMPJV\TION
11• L;st Dock Use Area Snecificatiuns:
Widtn of shorel-ine; Ctj'? i't. Length of' main dock from shore; � � ft.
Dock setbacks from side property lines at shore; 20 ft. and 2 C% _ ft.
12• Dock Construction (check applicable items):
seasonal dock (relocated or replaced each year).
_ rennanent pilir,C with seasonal deck. A pereanent piling ant decking.
wooden decking. metal deckir�;.
13. List Dock Accessories:
Number of fire extinguishers svei) W e at the deer
Number of iife preservers available the dock 21
14• List number of slips in each cetegory includes boat lifts):
Transient (day use only) slips Transient(de;; use) off -shore buoys
Fermenent moorage slips �. I-ermenent noorc.Ee off -shore buoys
Dry storage (rack) sli;s Maximum riur.ber of boatF at the dock
15. List nwnber of off' -street I,prr.i if F;nces available for users of the joint. ue
doer. }'arking, !f provided rust rot be se,?arnted from the dock by any public
road. spaces.
r.OSIO:i AND S'rMtL:vIATTON CCITROI:
16. Siioral"i ne - s »rc,tec trod by (check a:.pi: cebie i tetras) :
_ stone r J p ra},. wood seawal _ rr&L81 senwali. concrete seewell.
grass and vegetation only. other (specify)
17. Depth of water at shoreline is ft; at 50 ft. out is
a z 1.00 f t; . out 13
REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application:
A. DOCK PLAN - ALL APPLICATIONS
A dock plan, drawn to scale, showing the shoreline width of this property, the
side property lines and the location, layout and dimensions of all docks, slips
and buoys. If off-street parking, dry :storage or other on -land functions are
intended, these also should be shown on the plan.
B. UNINCORPORATED GROUPS OR ASSOCIATIONS
1. A list of the names and mailing addresses of all members and/or slip users.
2. A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use. Note: This
copy is not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following
statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock is to be
operated under the same by-laws or agreement originally made in
(state year) and on file with the City."
& - Applicant's initials
C. INCORPORATED CLUBS OR ASSOCIATIONS
1. A list of the names, mailing addresses and titles of all corporation officers.
2. A statement a- to the total number of members in the club or association.
members.
3. A certified copy of the articles of incorpuration and by-laws of the corporation.
Note: These copies are not required if the applicant initials and certifies
the following statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock
is to be cperated under the same articles of incorporation and/or by-laws as
originally made or last amended in lfdoG (state year) and on file with the
City."
�� Applicant's initials
Pace 4 of 5
D. ANNUAL LICENSE FEE - ALL APPLICATIONS
Joint Use Dock License Application fee according to the current
City Fee Schedule.
RENEWAL JOINT USE FEE, per year
PLUS SLIP FEE for each permanent
moorage slip, lift, Iry stack,
or buoy 6 slips @ $2.00 each
$ 20.00
TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $ `}2'
LATE FEE - Renewals
Applications for renewal of licenses shall be made no later than
February 1 of the license year. The City shall not accept renewal
license applications received after February 1 unless the application
is accompanied by a late fee of $25.00.
REVIEW PROCEDURE
When a complete application is received, the application will be
reviewed by the City Council and, in the case of new or unusual
applications, also by the Planning Commission and Marina Committee.
The Council will pass upon the application after complete review.
THE SUBJECT DOCK MAY BE INSTALLED AND/OR OPENED FOR USE ONLY UPON
APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant
hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Joint U::e Dock
License Application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and
the City's employees and agents to enter upon the property at any
reasonable time t perform safety and code compliance inspections -
Signed Date
Paqe 5 of 5
ATTACHMENT B
List of names and Mailing addresses of all members and/or
slipusers.
Da f f I3 u• T-k 6 A/N S A VA b e-
2699enue DY97 kQ.LC� /�r/vni«.�e
5 5 3 31 L: ,K 0 e.1- Sc /y' /V . Cr33 %
Daniel T. Lindsay
2321 Huntington Point Road E.
Wayzata, MN 55391
Peter Chow
4920 Colonial Drive
Golden Valley, MN 55416
-2-499--iEe3:3�-�►�n ue � y 5 5 /� L�, �'e./�/ � e
E 31 �X� ems �� e M N TI- 23/
RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO
ISSUE. A JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE
TO NAVARRE COVE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HBRBIN
FOR THE PERIOD OF JAMIARY 1, 1988 TO DBCM4BER 31, 1988
WHEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafter "City" is a
municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
State of Minnesota and has the authority and responsibility under
Minnesuta Statutes, State Statute 412, et. seq. and State Statute 462,
et. seq., to protect the health, safety, and gene -al welfare of the
citizens of the City and other members of the public within the Cityr
and
WHEREAS, the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over the
primary harbor limit of the City of Orono with the Lake Minnetonka
Conservation District and the Department of Natural Resources of the
State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the regulation of the navigable waters involves an
exercise of police power of the State, LMCD, and the City of Orono,
all of which have adopted rules to ensure to all equal n joyment of
the public rights and equal protection from activity on ..)r near the
public waters and on the land within the City which, if unregulated,
may be detrimental to the public heal�h, safety and general welfare;
and
WHEREAS, the regulations of the DNR, LMCD, and the City of
Orono regulate the property rights of the riparian cwnert both as to
r-sidential owners anj the commercial mi—ina owners to the extent
,hibiting any interference with the pi.' , is waters adjoining their
.erty. The LMCD, DNR and City of Orono must fulfill their
•-usteeship over the public waters by protecting against interference
by anyone, including tt:ose who assert the commonlaw rights of riparian
owners, whether or nvt tr.vy be commercial marinas or residential
owners;
WHEREAS, L3 to rake Minnetonka, a mutual riqht of enjoyment
exists between and is -red by riparian owners and the public
generally, no one riparian owner has exc;liisi,.e privileges over Lake
Minnetonka. The only additional private rig!it tt•at an}, riparian owner
mziy have over the public generally is to construct one dock j the
navigable deptt, of the public waters. There car: be no disc- _e but
that the public generally and each riparian caner to Lake Minnetonka
has the right to use the entire surface area of Lakf 'inne+-nnka for
all juitable purposes in common witt, all other riparian owr: ys. This
right is a right not only to members of the pl-,hlic L;.c the fight to
each riparian owner.
Page l of
This mutual right of enjoyment which is shared by riparian owners and
the public generally includes the rec:ritional benefits of the lake
such as boating and fishing therein the riparian owner has no
exclusive privileges to these rights; and
WHEREAS, Lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial
beneficial public use only as long as al- riparian users of the lake
are regulated in such a --ay as to ensure there is ro abuse of the
limited riparian rights;
WHEREAS, the City has adopted reasonable regulation-,
regarding the construction and use of lakeshore and dock facilities
when such facilities aze used and maintained by three or more
familief . whi.cri regulations include the a.--)ual licensing of ;joint Use
Docks pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution i, to set forth the
above noted general conditia 1 and concerns and th._ following special
conditions as they relate to un application for an annual Joint Use
Dock License described cr Fxhibit A attached,
140W, THEREPORL '. d iT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the
City of Orono hereby directs the Staff to issue a Joint Use Dock
License according L-%) the fact¢ and conditions noted on Exhibit A
attached.
Adopted by the City Counci'. the City of Orono at their
meeting on the 8th day of Februr-- 19-
ATTEST:
Dorothy M, Hal].i> city Clerk
JW, Grabek, Mayor
Paqe 2 o2 2
CITY OF ORONO
EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO.
CONDITIONS OF ISSUANCE FOR ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE
I. LICENSEE: Navarre Cove Homenwners Association
Dock Address: 2505 Kelly Avenue
Aqent: Tom Dahl
Address: 2499 Kelly Avenue, Excelsior, MN 55331
Licensee is: unincorporated homeowner's group
XX incorporated homeowner's association
unincorporated club or recreation group
incorporated club or recreation group
other
License Period - January 1, 1988 to December 31, 1988
II. BOAT DENSITY
The number of in -place boat slips, lifts and buoys shall not exceed
the number shown on the attached plan, Exhibit B, and in accordance
with Resolution 938, in no case shall the number of authorized boat
slips, lifts, or buoys exceed the number permitted in the prior year's
license.
Authorized Boat Density per attached plan:
Bay Carman
Transient (Day use only) Slips 0
Permanent Moorage Slips 6
Boat Lifts 0
Sub -Total: Slip. at Dock 6
Offshore Buoys 0
Maximum Boats in water 6
Maximum
Boats
per prior
license
same
MAYIMUM
BOAT
DENSITY
6
Exhibit A
Resolution No.
Page 2
Exceeding this maximum boat density, or exceeding the number of
permitted slips, lifts or buoys is a violation of this license subject
to revocation and/or prosecution for violation of Section 5.42
Subdivision 2 of the Orono Municipal Code.
III. DOCK LAB gT
The dock structure or layout authorized by this license shall be as
shown on attached Exhibit B. Any changes in this layout shall be
subject to prior review and approval of the City Council.
IV. SPECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinance of
the City and/or the LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to
full compliance with these conditions. Failure to comply with these
conditions is cause for license revocation and/or prosecution by the
City.
"NONE"
V. Nothing in this license shall confer upon any person for the
benefit of any property any vested right to use Lake Minnetonka or the
premises in a manner permitted by this resolution, but the use of Lake
Minnetonka and the premises shall remain subject to such regulations
and ordinances as the City and other competent regulatory authorities
shall deem necessary from time to time in the public interest.
�----PTO •/irvt�Xy ��'y�,
of
��1 C
I 2-
I
. GA0�7O EQ 9Jb!7lLO � � 9 8$ P�
i
04T REso�.Nn•
I
4/T/4/t.tT/ON G/
/91f-6
103 -
/tFV — 49
/,frr-s
l,r►G - 6
/qS7-GD
list-(oc
CITY OF ORONO D [EO v Mr
K 66
CRYSTALBAY, MN 55323 Z
473-7357
(association)l�il
ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE APPLICATION
Pursuant to Orono Mun c pal Code Section 5.42
LICENSE YEAR 19-6r?
Date Form Sent by City Staff /" s - 88 E17Y OF ^ROAD
Date Application Returned to City
$y�/ aw
By EmployeeNFee Recived 4E.40
NEC`' 11 46.00
—ncn P GU
Section 5.42 Subdivision 2. LICENSE REQUIRED - It is unlaw 4ni 4a711:19
(group or association of persons or famiYies, more than trwo''�in,n ,
whether incorporated or not) to engage or participate in... joint uss01/2.1./99
(of any lakeshore property) without first having obtained a license
therefor from the City.
PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED
ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY
FEBRUARY I OF THE LICENSE YEAR.
ASSOCIATION INFORMATION
1. Association title or name (if any),6r,u,LL 1D1f0.'WeWS .0S514077-,✓
2. Lake 111,V4,f nwKA-- Bay 5NirN
3. Person responsible for this application:
NameVWE�✓ Ny 4/4fz,- Phone 77S-i699 542-9900
Mailing Address /i90 A/rpu-C,s,✓E 4/Ry70"V "Al 53-39/
Relatio^ship to association G'or, /'PeoJ n.Gc-i:—
Page 1 of 5
4. Acsociation is (check anplicable items):
uninco:l�rrctcd homo%mer's group.
incorporated Homeowner's Association.
unincorporated club or recreation group.
incorporated club or recreation group.
5. Principal purpose of joint use dock Is (check applicable items):
!= Provide boat scoring and lake access for resident'al property.
provide swimming access, beach, or offshore dock.
provide r, club or association gathering place for activities.
6. Dock is located on (check applicable item):
one mviber's private property.
easement or outlot ovned in comen.
property leased by the group/association.
property owed by the group/association.
7. List Dock location and ownership information:
street eddress '5�r-w Ate' Arrs7-p
legal property description
PID
listed property owner(s)
S. Names of abutting lakeshore property owners:
(North/Nest)&4g;'✓ 4Ofr in.✓ /%3o Sf4rE4.�e AC/y.97s a.�.:ll'34i
Name ♦ A re65)
(South/East; DAy10 l✓ion �J OtP fftet,-K �2 �vAy�.,a.Ts SI39/
Name + Adareshi
Names of other affected property owners:
A)oA)F
Name + Address) (a LLAch sheet if necessary
2 of 5
.. -9, I;,rs;•:..•:e CGVer•.ge - Tge Jointly rseJ doer, in insured by ono. of tie fo'_;ovind:
_ Property ewer's homecvner's Policy.
repsrate Cru,:n/associ.ption owned ;olicy.
ant the folloviniL informatio
n
: A
name of Insured FyP"- -Ct �+M c O>✓.✓Eni .0'�f-0C�P T/o^�
name of insurance carrier /TTJ an//'// •L1/ ..+r+,o,C G'
name of insurance agency e/WsiCt/1 A,-V Yfec- CO
policy M. CL5 0 7-/366 effective date of coverage 3 /
amount of coverage; Public 11nt111ty, per Person, per occurence 5
Public liabil.lty, per occurence ey � B00
10• Security and policing of the Jointly use-4 dock and property is provided by
(check applicable items):
fencing. k security lighting. _ property owner's presence.
contract security service. other (specify)
DOCK INFORMATION
11. List Dock Use Area Specificatiune:
Width of shoreline, 293.t6 ft. Lengtt. of mein dock from shore; /may ft.
Dock setbacks from side property lines at share; ! ft. and W ft.
12• Dock Construction (Check applicable item ):
seasonal dock (relocated or replaced each year).
penesnent piling with seasonal deck. _ permanent piling and decking.
wooden decking. _ total de: -.
13. List Dock Accessories:
Number of fin extinguishers eveileble at the dock ONE Onl &FCA, 4SO.4
Number of life preservers available at the dock 04,) aOq TJ
14. List number of slips in tech ce LeGory ('blips" includes boat lifts):
Transient (day use only) slips Transient(day use) off -shot. buoys
Permanent moorage slips 1. lermenent coorege off -shore buoys
Dry storage (reek) slips Maximum number of boat$ at the dock /-
15• List number of off-street perking spaces available for "ere of the Joint use
dock. Parkin'}, if provided runt not be separsted from the dock by any public
road. mesas.
3 of 5
EPOSION AND SEDIlff.NIATION CONTROL
16. Shoreline !.a protected by (check applicable items):
stone rip rep. _ wood seawal-.. _ metal seawall. concrete oee�. sal
grass and vegetation only. other (specify)
17. Depth of water at shoreline Is fti at 50 ft. out is 7
at 100 ft. out is sh/,
REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this +rplication:
A. DOCK PLAN - ALL APPLICATIONS
A dock plan, drawn to scale, showing the shoreline width of this property, the
aide property lines and the location, layout and dimensions of all docks, slips
and buoys. If off-street parking, dry storage or other on -land functions are
intended, these also should be show on the plan.
B. UNINCORPORATED GROUPS OR ASSOCIATIONS
1. A list of the names and mailing addresses of all members and/or slip users.
2. A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use. Note: This
copy is not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following
statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use doc�j7 �i'� to be. o C
operated under the same by-laws or agreement originally
stat year) and on file with the City." OG✓n Q�Cay..—(.1_j? v A3
A;��
Applicant's initials ;..a,�s /,jr /�7F
C. INCORPORATED CLUBS OR ASSOCIATIONS
1. A list of the names, mailing addresses and titles of all corporation officers.
2. A_sytement as to the total number of members in the club or association.
/[f members.
3. A certified copy of the articles of incorporation and by-laws of the corporation.
Note: These copies are not required if the applicant initials and certifies
the following statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock
is to be operated under the same articles f incorporation and/or by-law as
originally made or last amended in l9%f (state year) and on file with the
C}W"
Applicant's initials
Pace 4 of 5
D. ANNUAL LICENSE FEE - ALL APPLICATIONS
Joint Use Dock License Application fee according to the current
City Fee Schedule.
RENEWAL JOINT USE FEE, per
year
$ 20.00
PLUS SLIP
FEE for each permanent
moorage
slr lift, dry
stack,
or buoy
slips @
$2.00 each
$
TOTAL DUE
THIS APPLICATION
$- �'Sl
LATE FEE - Renewals
Applications for renewal of licenses shall be made no later than
February 1 of the license year. The City shall not accept renew
When a complete application is received, the application will be
reviewed by the City Council and, in the case of new or unusual
applications, also by the Planning Commission and Marina Committee.
The Council will pass upon the application after complete review.
THE SUBJECT DOCK MAY BE INSTALLED AND/OR OPENED FOR USE ONLY UPON
APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY Cn"NCIL.
Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant
hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Joint Use Dock
License Application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and
the City's employees and agents to enter upon the property at any
reasonable timi to perform safety and code compliance inspections.
Signed � � 7'04Date /f7/8P
Pa ur S r.t 5
F'ov�li�C. DOGC L,npc�fr
ly, i1F7
RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO
ISSUE A JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE
TO FOXHILL HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN
FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 1968 TO DECEMBER 31, 1988
WHEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafter "City" is a
municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
State of Minnesota and has the authority and responsibility under
Minnesota Statutes, State Statute 412, et. seq. and State Statute 462,
et. seq., to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the
citizens of the City and other members of the public within the City;
and
WHEREAS, the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over the
primary harbor limit of the City of Orono with the Lake Minnetonka
Conservation District and the Department of Natural Resources of the
State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the regulation of the navigable waters involves an
exercise of police power of the State, LMCD, and the City of Orono,
all of which have adopted rules to ensure to all equal enjoyment of
the public rights and equal protection from act.vity on or near the
public waters and on the land within the City which, if unregulated,
may be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare;
and
WHSRHAS, the regulations of the DNR, LMCD, and the City of
Orono regulate the property rights of the riparian owners both as to
residential owners and the commercial marina owners to the extent
prohibiting any interference with the public waters adjoining their
property. The LMCD, ONE and City of Orono must fulfill their
trusteeship over the public waters by protecting against interference
by anyone, including those who assert the commonlaw rights of riparian
owners, whether or not they be commercial marinas or residential
owners;
WBEREA8, as to Lake Minnetonka, a mutual right of enjoyment
exists between and is share.] by riparian owners and the public
generally, no one riparian owner has exclusive privileges over Lake
Minnetonka. The only additional private right that any riparian owner
may have over the public generally is to construct one dock to the
navigable depth of the public waters. There can be no dispute but
that the public generally and each riparian owner to Lake Minnetonka
has the right to use the entire surface area of Lake Minnetonka for
all suitable purposes in common with all other riparian owners. This
right is a right not only to members of the public but the right to
each riparian owner.
Page 1 of 2
This mutual right of enjoyment which is shared by riparian owners and
the public generally includes the recreational benefits of the lake
such as boating and fishing therein; the riparian owntc has no
exclusive privileges to these rights; and
WHEREAS, Lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial
beneficial public use only as long as all riparian users of the lake
are regulated in such a way as to ensure t) -e is no abuse of the
limited riparian rights; and
WHEREAS, the City has adopted reasonable reguleti>ns
regarding the construction and use of lakeshore and dock facilities
when such facilities are used and maintained by three or more
families, which regulations include the annual licensing of Joint Use
Docks pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to set forth the
above noted general conditions and concerns and the following special
conditions as they relate to an application for en annual Joint Use
Dock License described on Exhibit A attached,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the
City of Orono hereby directs the Staff to issue a Joint Use Dock
License according to the facts and conditions noted on Exhibit A
attached.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono at their
meeting on the 8th day of February, 1988.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Rallin, City Clerk
James R. Grabek, Mayor
Paqe 2 of 2
CITY OF ORONO
EXHIBIT A
RESV' .TION NO.
CONDITIONS OF ISSUANCE FOR ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE
I. LICENSEE: Foxhill Homeowners Association
Dock Address: 1801 Shoreline Drive
Agent: Owen A. Parr
Address: 1190 Heritage Lane, Wayzata, MN 55391
Licensee is: unincorporated homeowner's group
XX incorporated homeowner's association
unincorporated cluo or recreation group
inccrporated club or recreation group
other
License Period - January 1, 1988 to December 31, 1988
II. dOAT DENSITY
The number of in -place boat slips, lifts and buoys shall not exceed
the number shown on the attached plan, Exhibit B, end in accordance
with Resolution 9'8, in no case shall the number of authorized boat
slips, lifts, or buoys exceed the number permitted in the prior year's
license.
Authorized Boat Density per attached plan:
Bay Smith's
Transient (Day use only) Slips 0
Permanent Moorage Slips 13
Boat Lifts 0
Sub -Total: Slips at Cock 13
Offshore Buoys 0
Maximum Boats in Water 13
Maximum Boats per prior limo - 13
MAXIMUM ROAT DENSITY 13
Exhibit A
Resolution No.
Page 2
Exceeding this maximum boat density, or exceeding the number of
permitted slips, lifts or buoys is a violation of this license subject
to revocation and/or prosecution for violation of Section 5.42
Subdivision 2 of the Orono Municipal Code.
III. DOCK LAYOUT
The dock structure or layout authorized by this license shall be as
shown on attached Exhibit S. Any changes in this layout shall be
subject to prior review and approval of the City Council.
IV. SPECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinance of
the City and/or the LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to
full compliance with these conditions. Failure to comply ith these
conditions is cause for license revocation and/or prosecution by the
City.
1. The maximum number of slips or moorings to be licensed in the
future shall not exceed 16 provided that °or any given year, the
license shall be issued for no more than 1 boat per residence in
the Foxhill Subdivision according to the findings set forth in
the Resolution 1042 adopted by the City Council of the City of
Orono on the 12th day of June, 1979.
2. Winter storage of dock parts and sections shall be permitted
on Outlot #1 between the time the dock is removed from the lake
in the fall and June 1st of the fol lowing year.
V. Nothing in this license shall confer upon any person for the
benefit of any property any vested right to use Lake Minnetonka or the
premises ir. a manner permitted by this resolution, but the use of Lake
Minnetonka and the premises shall remain subject to such regulations
and ordinances as the City and other competent regulatory authorities
shall deem necessary from time to time in the public interest.
!).6 ) 23
JJ.9!/ •I 1 ,
JL Aj. Ayr
a. AD,.•
'•if FJ :t £JfrA :'�
2'192e
62.79
.d-J ArA.-L•62.V -
L•Ee.2 ce2.es
as ._ e • J•Jras'
`Gc•A�65 a '
C.D.UNrr R0. �..:
132 .
N 33'02'Je•F
—
`� hawAwevf Wsr
n s2c Y fr0-.bus oo. . I:.h
:. rAJ:a, :a /I•f:
PRES
OUirLOT if -/. .� EA 5CMA
"ft' ftA:" ' LAKE MINNEMNKA.
�~- t su/TKS • bAY00
ASS(#4,fo to J''..I''CASrL
b y �'snwseE•I.
Q $ � � A' • peDPc
7rY^As APC 8' L. rb { % X 11 '- rR.cr:
G h r,
31 MAL ACSOC. y // /A /3 0 H ` a SwAz
cl
Corr A.KF
I1 C
/ 2 3 4 5 6 7$ 9 /0 l a r
E: /'- 42.66' —1 SR I �i
20' 4/N.. FA31 NENf -
I
0H
"•��� / fR04 wE3f EOG£' ' �--�I1 '�•
�I6&0
OF PROPOSED I b G
fAON [Asr I 1 � '•\ / -* EASTERN rRAcr
• EASr(AN EOGE Of /MP9S[0 •---� •N O
' ---- JForNfrr /7ffvc/wr+
t
EAt_.
� VI��OFT
i
P�TZtFe,
= Comae iL
✓/4DE2 . .
.%ilCDz�..rSrl .
FOX�h LL DoCC L4gcJr
i98a fro
13 suvs I
CITY OF ORONO LICENSE YEAR 19 SQ
P.O. BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 2
473-7357 JAN
'_� I
(association) V 1 C-T1DvVA- 7C�
ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE APPLICATION
Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.42
Date Form Sent by City Staff_ _ 1-S -se
Date Application Returned to City
PITY fr CRCNO
Fee Recived S 39 By Employee 1� :2'1JSCCL'CCr r'*n' M
b7 WFIP
rKrfR iL J2.00
Section 5.42 Subdivision 2. LICENSE REQUIRED - It is unlawfa}i�,t,0; YvnLi
(group or association of persons or families, more than twd ;tFn
whether incorporated or not) to engage or participate in: .3�lirit'�'h ••'
(of any lakeshore property) without first having obtained a license N/'J.'36
therefor from the City.
PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED
ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY
FEBRUARY 1 OF THE LICENSE YEAR.
ASSOCIATION INFORMATION
1.
Association tittle or na,
(if any) L/ICrLa.a
£sans i(o.. o—nui Ann.
2.
Lake Mi.ne� 4k
__Bay OA` .
1)rw
3.
Person repponsible for
this application:
`172- 7Fi4
Mailing Address
S4,G IUrrc.%
sp+n
p
Relationship to
association
F\iaok.vT
Page 1 of 5
4. Acsociatior. is (check ar.Illiceble items):
2unlncorirratcd ho,,eowner's gmu1.
✓ iincorporated Homeowner's Association.
unincorporated club or recreation group.
incorporated club or recreation group.
5. Principal purpose of joint wee dock is (check applicable items,':
V provide boat mooring and lake access for residential property.
provide awimming access, beech, or offshore dock.
provide a club or association gathering i'lece for activities.
6. lock is located on (check applicable item):
_ on rember'a private property.
easement or outlot owned in common.
property leased by the group/associetion.
property owned by the group/association.
7. List Dock location and ownership Information:
street address Sk0 i OozrN AeM DR
legal property description
PID
listed property ovner(s) '?G-. v� c , 5�. n M�qz� Bn�. f .. f wcv.� �r.....:..('W N•�:ati
8. Names of abutting lakeshore property owners:
(North/west) Aa„Crz
(Name + Address)
(South/East) 1)GO,'E
(Name + Address)
Names of other affected property owners:
ARo: e.
Nam +� (attach sheet if necessary)
2 of 5
9 , Icr .:r.rs Ccversge - Tne jointly used dock is insured by one of tie following:
_�r+:operty owner's hon.,eower's ;v11cy.
r/ repnxte grins/ossoclntion owned policy.
118t the following Information:
name of insured V t4ToRq £SretES (✓°nsow,vF Ass,,.
new of insurance carrier Vk PAAMAU FliatltY Tut_
name of insurance agency
policy ran. effective date of coverage
amount of coverage; public liability, per person, per occurence
Public liability, per occurence a S°o °°°
10• Securit" and policing of the ,Jointly used dock and property Is provided by
(check npplicable items):
fen_ing. _ security lighting. ✓ property owner's presence.
cortract security service. other (specify)
DOCK IMPORKMON
11. List Dock Use Area Specifications: uo C140N6p
Width of shoreline; •'br• ft. LenctE of main dock from More; 77op St.
Dock netbacks from side property lines at shore; ft. and Soo _ ft.
12• Dock ;onstruction (check applicable items):
seasonal dock (reloceted or replaced each year).
fermanent piling with seasonal deck. Zpermnent piling and decking.
Wooden decking. _ metal decking.
13. List Dock Accessories:
Number of fire extinguishers available at the dock L
Numi•er of life preservers available at the dock [J
14• Lis; number of slips 1n each category ("alips" inclu9es boat lifts):
Transient (day we only) slips _Transient(dey use) off -Shore buoys
/_
permanent moorage slips �a u%AN 165iie)Lrmenent moorage off -shore buoys
Dr;- storage (rack) slips Maximum number c. bouts at the deck A 61AS1
15• LSWt number of off-street perking spaces available for users of the ,Join+m::e
do:k. Parking, if provided must not be setersted from the dock by any public
road. �_ S:xces.
q ,.f
EROSION AND S-,:DIt0ffATIO1'.' CCATRDi
16. Si,oreline is p^otec Led by (check applicable items): V6 CNAe76,E
stone rip rep. _ wood seaval .. _ meta]. seawall. concrete senvell.
grass and vegetation only. other (specify)
i
17. Depth of water at shoreline is n ft; at 50 ft. out is L—;
i
at 100 ft. out is )� .
REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application:
A. DOCK PLAN - ALL APPLICATIONS
A dock plan, drawn to scale, showing the shoreline width of this property, the
aide property lines and the location, layout and dimensions of all docks, slips
and buoys. If off-street parking, dry storage or other on -land functions are
intended, these also should be shown on the plan.
B. UNINCORPORATED GROUPS OR ASSOCIATIONS
1. A list of the names and mailing addresses of all members and/or slip users.
2. A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use. Notes This
copy is not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following
statement: "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock is to be
operated under the same by-laws or agreement originally made in )9 70
rate year) and on file with the City."
Applicant's initials
C. INCORPORATED CLUBS OR ASSOCIATIONS
1. A list of the names, mailing addresses and titles of all corporation officers.
2. A statement as to the total number of members in the club or association.
_t members.
3. A certified copy of the articles of incorporation and by-laws of the corporation.
Note: These copies are not required if the applicant initials and certifies
the following statements "This is a renewal application and our joint wa dock
is to be operated under the same articles of incorporation and/or by-law as
originally made or last amended in (k 7$ (st:.te year) and on file with the
� — Applicant's initials
Pace 4 of 5
M
D. ANNUAL LICENSE FEE - ALL APPLICATIONS
Joint Use Dock License Application fee according to the current
City Fee Schedule.
RENEWAL JOINT USE FEE, per year $ 20.00
PLUS SLIP FEE for each permanent
moorage slip lift, dry stack,
or buoy slip
A $2.00 each $ Iz .00
TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $ 32.00
LATE FEE - Renewals
Applications for renewal �,f licenses shall be made no later than
February 1 of the license year. The City shall not accept renew
When a complete application is received, the application will be
reviewed by the City Council and, in the case of new or unusual
applications, also by the Planning Commission and Marina Committee.
The Council will pass upon the application after complete review.
THE SUBJECT DOCK MAY BE INSTALLED AND/OR OPENED FOR USE ONLY UPON
APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant
hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Joint Use Dock
License Application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and
the City's employees and agents to enter upon the property at any
reasonable tiV!>to perform safety and code compliance inspections.
Signed ltfCuw f/ %lta... Ni)
Paqe 5 of 5
RF.sou7noN No. .1(.$..
A RESOUITION A:PROVIN(' THE PUT OF VICTORIA ESTATES
WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHERE: the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted
subdivision rebulations for the orderly, economic and safe development
of land within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the appl!^stion
for a subdivision plat by Victoria Crain Company (Robert Cargill
and Richard Doherty), the subdivider; and
WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of
the platting regulations of the City, including:
1. Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 868
and Resolution No. 954.
2. Platting of lot configuration according to attached copy
of Final Plat.
1. Creation of a homeowner's nssociation and/or mutual
covenants and easements providing for ownership and
maintenance of Dutlot R and Outlot C.
4. Dedication to the City of a Conservation Easement and
Agreement (Exhibit A) providing for limitations on the
alteration or use of wetlands and drainageways described
therein, such limitations extending over those areas
shown on the plat an outlot s, Outlot C and the "wetland"
area on i.ots 4 6 5.
5. Dedication to the Cit- of a Conservation Easement
(Exhibit e) providing for limitations on the use and
development of Outlot A until such time that said outlot
is held in common fee title and combined for tax purpo.t"
with Tract C, RL.S924.
6. Dedication on the plat of "drainage and utility easements"
1
Resolution No. 962
Page 2
Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fee in
the amount of $2,122.50.
a. Payment to the City of all variable addiclonal
costs incurred by the City in processing and
reviewing this subdivision application, according
to ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Victoria Estates,
Hennepin County, Minnesota; subject to the following conditions;
Lots 1, 2, 7, 4, 5, and 6, Block 1, Victoria Estates,
are hereby determined to be riparian to Lake Minnetonka
by virtue of common ownership of Outlet B and Outlet C.
Exercise of the riparian rights of Lots 1 through 6 .I
shall be by means of the common dnok constructed and
maintained across Outlot g by authority of the
Conservation Easement and Agreement (Exhibit A).
Said dock shall provide persansnt or temporary amrings
for a mximae of six boats. The snoring of three or
more boats shall be subject to application for and
receipt of an annual Joint use dock license according
to City ordinance. �t
7. Nothing it this resolution shall be interpreted to awn
that the City Council believes that the channel shown
on the plat was legally excavated, we legally in
existence, is a navigable waterway, or that anyons has
the right to dredge said channel now or in the future
for any purpose. Nothing herein contained shall he
construed to mean that the City Council will not entertain
a future application for maintananee dredging of said
channel up to the dock parmitted he in. Now ever. the
City Council bas indicated to Subdividers that it would
probably not issue any such drafting permit going beyond
this dock. Further, the City tau ctl determines Nat
these lands upstream from Victoria Estates are not
riparian to Lake Minnetonka.
womews—
s'
T
Resolution No. 962
page 3
4. The aforesaid plat shall be filed with the dennapin
County Recorder's office on or before June 12, 1979
together with a certified original copy of this
Resolution and executed copies of fshibits A and D
as noted above.
The aproval on
pire if
not been filed rbytthe datefspecified iabove•ll In x that events, itss will
be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for
subdivision review.
Dated this1a day of De mhe 19-2JL..
ZA
D, va Nest. Mayor l�
ATTEST:
Itar R. oa�m. Clark Adainls [ra tor.
CONSERVATION EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT
THIS INDENTURE AND AGREDMENT, Made and entered into this
%- day of Akce? w `Ave , 1978, by and between
Robert M. Cargill and Patricia G. Cargill, hatband and wife; and
Richard T. Doherty and Alice J. Doherty, husband and wife,
(hereinafter collectively referred to as -Grantors-) and the
City of Orono, a municipal corporation under the laws of the
State of Minnesota, (hereinafter referred to as 'Grantee'),
W I T H E_ S_ B_ E_ T H_:
WHEREAS, the following -described land has been platted
as Victoria Estates and the plat thereof duly filed with the
Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, to -wits
Tract B. Registered Land Survey No. 926, files of
Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, State of
Minnesota, except that part thereof lying easterly
of a line described as follows:
Commencing at the Northeast corner of said
Tract B; thence West along the North lane
of said Tract B a distance of 200 feet to
the point of beginning of the line being
described; thence deflecting left 110 degrees
through the Southerly line of said Tract B.
ALSO
Tract C, Psgiatered Land Survey No. 154, files
Of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin,
State of Minnesota.
WHEREAS, Grantors are the owners of the following -
described property situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota,
to -wit:
Outlot B and Outlot C, Victoria Estates,
according to the duly recorded plat thereof,
files of Registrar of Titles, County of
Hennepin,
said land being hereinafter referred to as 'the Conservation
A•ea,' and,
WHEREAS, said plat contains the following parcels of
land, to -wit:
Lots 1, 1, 1, t, S. 6, Block 1,
and Otatlot A, all in Victoria Estates, according
to the Italy recorded plat thereof, Registrar
of Tit Le, County of Hennepin,
Laid lots and uutlot being hereinafter collectively rafcrred to
a.. 'the bwidvn U al Land,"
" r,a
'di UG AS, the Conservation Area is flood plain and
t
wet -land conservation area as that term is defined in City of
Orono Ordinance No. 125; and,
WHEREAS, the Conservation Area is situated between the
Residential Land and the body of Lake Minnetonka, and;
WHEREAS, the Conservation Area is traversed by a channel
connected to the body of Lake Minnetonka] and,
WHEREAS, Grantee acknowledges and agrees that the
Residential Land is riparian to Lake Minnetonka and that the
owners thereof, their heirs, successors, and assigns, have
the right of reasonable access from the Residential Land to Lake
Minnetonka; and,
r
WHEREAS, Grantors and Grantee desire that the only
:cease from the Residential Land to Lake Minnetonka be over
an existing dock over Outlet H from the Residential Land to
said existing channel; and,
WHEREA.i, Grantee acknowledges and agrees that said
right of reasonable access will necessarily require the continued
existence of said existing dock in perpetuity and, from ties to
time, maintenance and repair to insure the continued reasonable
access to the body of Lake Minnetonka by the owners of the
Residential Land, their successors, heirs, and assigns, and,
WHEREAS, Grantors and Grantee desire that the Conservation
Area remain in its natural state In perpetuity, all for the
benefit of Grantee, subject only to the rights of Granters, their
heirs and .:asigns, to construct, acpair and maintain said dock
and to reasonable access to the body of Lake Minnetonka over said
dock and the Conservation Areal and,
WHER±,hS, Grantors do not intend that the public should
have any iur,erest in the Conservation Ara& or the Residential
Land by virtue of this Indenture or othemiss,
NOW, THEREPORE, Grantors, their heirs and &@signs, hereby
grant, gift, and convey to Grantee, its successors and assigns, the
right to restrict, limit, no preclude the use, bprwement,
2
..... .—vu.w,the wnsm'vatiun Aria uedur the conditions
1
ana Covenants hereinafter Contained.
Grantors, their hem dild assigns, hereby Covenant as
follows:
1. 1,'o structu.es shall be constructed, ere•-.ted, or
placed upon, above, or beneath the Conservation Area including
without limitation fences, fireplaces, steps, docks, piers,
levees, signs, billboards, or other advertising, utilities,
hard -cove- or roads of any nature whatsoever, or any other
structure or improvement inconsistent with the :.atural state of
the Conservation Area.
2. No trees, shrubs, or other vegetation shall be
destroyed, cut, or removed from the Conservation Area except as
authroired by written consent o1 Grantee, its successors and
assigns.
1. No earth, loam, peat, gravel, soil, or any other
natural material or substance shall be moved or removed fro•
the Conservation Area and there shall be no dredging or
excavation of any nature whatsoever or any change of the topo-
graphy of the Conservation Area without the written consent of
Grantee, its successors and assigns.
4. NO 5011, send, gravel, or other substance Or Yterial
as landfill shall be placed, dumped, or stored upon the
Conservation Area, and no warts, trash, or garbage shall be
placed, dumped, or stored upon the Conservation Ate&.
S. No use shall be made of the Conservation Area except
uses, if any, which -_ill net change or alter the ratural condition
of the Conservation Area, and no use which would tend to Mange the
drainage, flood control, water conservation, erosion control,
soil conservation, fish and wildlife habitat characteristics
shatl be made of the Conservation Area or the wate• situated thereon.
Grantors, their heirs and assigns, hereby grant, gift,
and convoy to Grantee, its successors and assigns, the right to
o nt,r '„on the Conservation Area for the purposes of inspectlr.
1
and cnforcemunt of the covenants contained herein and to easue
to le removed from the Conservation Area any structures,
materials, substances, or unnatural matter inconsistent with the
covenants contained herein and the naLaral state of the Conservation
Area.
NOTWITHSTANDING AI4Y OF THE FONEGOING, .cantors, their
heirs and assigns, expressly reserve. the right to i r and
maintain said existing dock over the Conservation Area to the
body of Lake Minnetonka, in perpetuity. Grantors, their heirs
and assigns, hereby covenant as follow, I
1. Said dock shall have a maximum width of tour feet.
2. Said dock shall commence at the Residential Land,
terminate at the intersection of said existing channel and the body
of Lake Minnetonka, and shall be adjacent to said existing
channel for a maximum length of 180 feet.
1. The portion of the dock constructed immediately
adjacent to the existing channel shall extend into said existing
chtnnel a distance of thirty inches.
e. Said dock shall provide permanent moorings for a
maximum of six pleasure boats.
5. Said dock shall be used as a permanent mooring only
by persona in possession of the Residential Land.
6. Said dock shall not extend into the body of Lake
Minnetonka. I r
Grantee hereby acknowledges and agrees that Grantors,
their heirs and assigns, have the right to construct, maintain,
and repair the dock in accordance with the foregoing covenants.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The parties hereto have caused these
pcumiaea to be executed the day and yaar f1 at above
Ro be it M. Ca c r T. r y
v.,uTcr• G. Carga y
RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO
ISSUE A JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE
TO VICTORIA ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN
FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 1988 TO DECKER 31, 1988
WHEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafter "City" is a
municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
State of Minnesota and has the authority and responsibility under
Minnesota Statutes, State Statute 412, at. seq. and State Statute 462,
at. seq., to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the
citizens of the City and other members of the public within the City;
and
WHEREAS, the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over the
primary harbor limit of the City of Orono with the Lake Minnetonka
Conservation District and the Department of Natural Resources of the
State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the regulation of the navigable waters involves an
exercise of police power of the State, LMCD, and the City of Orono,
all of which have adopted rules to ensure to all equal enjoyment of
the public rights and equal protection from activity on or near the
public waters and on the land within the City which, if unregulated,
may be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare;
and
WHEREAS, the regulations of the DNR, LMCD, and the City of
Orono regulate the property rights of the riparian owners both as to
residential owners and the commercial marina owners to the extent
prohibiting any interference with the public waters adjoining their
property. The LMCD, DNR and City of Orono must fulfill their
trusteeship over the public waters by protecting against interference
by anyone, including those who assert the commonlaw rights of riparian
owners, whether or not they be commercial marinas or residential
owners;
WHEREAS, as to Lake Minnetonka, a mutual right of enjoyment
exists between and is shared by riparian owners and the public
generally, no one riparian owner has exclusive privileges over Lake
Minnetonka. The only additional private right that any riparian owner
may have over the public generally is to construct one dock to the
navigable depth of the public waters. There can be no dispute but
that the public generally and each riparian owner to Lake Minnetonka
has the right to use the entire surface area of Lake Minnetonka for
all suitable purposes in common with all other riparian owners. This
right is a right not only to members of the public but the right to
each riparian owner.
Page 1 of 2
This mutual right of enjoyment which is shared by riparian owners and
the public generally includes the recreational benefits of the lcke
such as boating and fishing therein; the riparian owner has no
exclusive privileges to these rights; and
WHEREAS, Lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial
beneficial public use only as long as all riparian users of the lake
are regulated in such a way as to ensure there is no abuse of the
limited riparian rights; and
WHEREAS, the City has adopted reasonable regulations
regarding the construction and use of lakeshore and dock facilities
when such facilities are used and maintained by three or more
families, which regulations include the annual licensing of Joint Use
Docks pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to set forth the
above noted oeneral conditions and concerns and the following special
conditions as they relate to an application for an annual Joint Use
Dock License described on Exhibit A attached,
WOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the
City of Orono hereby directs the Staff to issue a Joint Use Dock
License according to the facts and conditions noted on Exhibit A
attached.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono at their
meeting on the Sth day of February, 1980.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Sallin, City Clerk
James R. Grabek, Mayor
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF ORONO
EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO.
CONDITIONS OF ISSUANCE FOR ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE
I. LICENSEE: Victoria Estates Homeowners Association
Dock Address: 540 North Arm Drive
Agent: Thomas D. Mazer
Address: 560 North Arm Drive, Mound, MN 55364
Licensee is: unincorporated homeowner's group
XX incorporated homeowner's association
unincorporated club or recreation group
incorporated club or recreation group
other
License Period - January 1, 1988 to December 31, 1988
II. BOAT DENSITY
The number of in -place boat slips, lifts and buoys shall not exceed
the number shown on the attached plan, Exhibit B, and in accordance
with Resolution 938, in no case shall the number of authorized boat
slips, lifts, or buoys exceed the number permitted in the prior year's
license.
Authorized Boat Density per attached plan:
Bay North Arm
Transient (Day use only) Slips 0
Permanent Moorage Slips 6
Boat Lifts
Sub -Total: Slips at Dock 0
Offshore Buoys
Maximum Boats in Water 6
Maximum Boats per prior license 6
MAXIMUM BOAT DENSITY 6
Exhibit A
Resolution No.
Page 2
Exceeding this maximum boat density, or exceeding the number of
permitted slips, lifts or buoys is a violation of this license subject
to revocation and/or prosecution for violation of Section 5.42
Subdivision 2 of the Orono Municipal Code.
III. DOCK LAYOUT
The dock structure or layout authorized by this license shall be as
shown on attached Exhibit B. Any changes in this layout shall be
subject to prior review and approval of the City Council.
IV. SPECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinance of
the City and/or the LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to
full compliance with these conditions. Failure to comply with these
conditioAs is cause for license revocation and/or prosecution by the
City.
1. Six slips are approved for Victoria Estates Homeowners
Association for 1988 subject to the stipulations set forth in
Resolution 4962 dated December 18, 1978.
2. All boats permanently moored at this Joint Use Dock must be
registered to the applicant property owners.
V. Nothing in this license shall confer upon any person for the
benefit of any property any vested right to use Lake Minnetonka or the
premises in a manner permitted by this resolution, but the use of Lake
Minnetonka and the premises shall remain subject to such regulations
and ordinances as the City and other competent regulatory authorities
shall deem necessary from time to time in the public interest.
Outlot C
EXISTING CHANNEL
1S0'
22' Sedan 24' Cruiser 14'
�-4' CATWALK OVER 4' BOAT DOCK x 180' LONG.
YY WETLANDS TO SHORE.
� N � o
Outlot B P
N
m
e b. BOAT DOCK LOCATION s m d
R
`} ! w M Z S .� NO SCALE
oo�op�eo a
APR 13 1979 Plat of Victoria Estates
L N 1 I
� � u
CITY OF ORONO
P.O. BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323
473-7357
LICENSE YEAR 19�Ci
(association) WiTKA . IPO:_�tf_ Slil.ttgi�(,.-[�JJ
ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE APPLICATION
Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.42
Date Form Sent by City Staff 1- 5-8 a
Date Application Returned tj City Z -
/ vo
Fee Recived $ By Employee
Section 5.42 Subdivision 2. LICENSE REQUIRED - It is unlawful for any
persons or fami (group or association of pelies, more than two in number,
whether incorporated or not) to engage or participate in... joint use
(of any lakeshore property) without first having obtained a license
therefor from the City.
PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED
ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY
FEBRUARY 1 OF THE LICENSE YEAR.
CITY OF 01900
FINANCE OFFICE
ASSOCIATION INFORMATION 131F00000 #
01 LEA 110.00
1. Association title or name (if any) Min��a..,A 110.00
"LZIPT-4NANk IT
2. Lake Minnetonka Bay Lower c10
3. Person responsible for this application:
Name William F. Kelly Phone 474-5977
Mailing Address 351 2nd Street, Excelsior, MN 55331
Relationship to association Law Officer
Page 1 of 5
4. Aesoclstior. is (check ar,1111esble items):
%nir-corlerotcd honeowner's grou_+.
incorporated Homeowner's Association.
unincorporated club or recreation group.
X Incorporated club or recreation group.
5• Principal purpose of joint use dock is (check applicable items):
provide boat mooring and lake access for residential property.
provide swimming access, beach, or offshore dock.
% provide a club or association gathering place for activities.
6. Dock is located on (check applicable item):
one ramber's private property.
easement or outlot owned In common.
property leased by the group/association.
X property owned by the group/association.
7. List Dock location and ownership info r. tion:
street eddress Big Island CoRA �
legal property description Tract A, RLS 1294
Pro # unknown 22-11%-L3 14 0002
listed property owrer(s)
E. Names of abutting lakeshore property owners:
(Name + Address) "> MIMA). PA42KS .
i5outh/East) NONE
(Name + Address)
Names of other affected property owners:
NONE
Name + Address) (attach sheet if necessary
2 of 5
�9. •.: r.. ce Ccvercge - T::e Jointly csel dock is Insured by one of tic f^:.coin•,:
_ n operty owner's horuecwner's ro!Icy.
X repnrste L:m-!1/or;socic:ion owned policy.
list the following information:
name of insured Minnetonka Power Squadron
new of insurance carrier Western World Insurance Comnanvinn-
namo of insurance oeency Norwest Insurance Agency
policy no. GLA 217783 effective date of coverage -13Oix7-
7/30/gg
amount of coverage; Public liet111ty, per person, per occurence $ cnn nnn
Public liability, ter occurence $ goo Goo
10• Security and policing o: the jointly used. dock and property is provided by
(check applicable items):
fencing. _ security lighting. _.& property owner's presence.
Part Time
contract security service. other (specify)
DOCK INMPMATION
11• List Dock Use Area Specifications:
Width of shoreline; ft. Length of main dock from shore; ft.
Dock setback* from side property lines at shore; ft. VA ft.
3 *idea of property are bordered by water.
12• Dock Construction (check applicable item*):
X seasonal dock (relocated or replaced each year).
permanent piling with seasonal deck. _ permanent piling and decking.
wooden decking. _ metal decking.
13. List Dock Accessories:
Number of fire extingulehe,a available at the dock On boat. e. ra��t r.A
Number of life preservers available at the dock On bowie s r.�irwA
14• List number of slips In each category ("slips" includes boat lifts):
Transient (day use only) slips 45 . Transient(day use) Off-Lbore buoys
Permanent moorage slips Permanent moorage off -shore buoys
Dry storage (reek) slips Maximus number of boate at the dock 45
15. List number of off-street parking spaces available for users of the ,pint use
dock. Parking, if provided must not be separated from the dock by any public
mod. spaces. N/A
3 of S
EWSI05 AND S"1;DI14XPATI N CO}H'R07:
16. Siioraline '.a protected by (check applicable ites:s):
X stone
rip
rep. _ wood eeawal ..
— RRtal.
Seawall.
— concrete seawall.
grass
anti
vegetation only. other
(specify)
17. Depth of water at shoreline is 0 ft; at 50 ft. out is AL -fit;
at 100 ft. out is 30 £t.
REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS The followivst accompany this application:
A. DOCK PLAN - ALL APPLICATIONS
A dock plan, drawn to scale. showing the shoreline width of this property, the
side property lines and the location, layout and dir�nsions of all docks, slips
and buoys. If off-street parking, dry storage or other on -land functions are
intended, these also should be shown on the plan.
B. UNINCORPORATED GROUPS OR ASSOCIATIONS
1. A list of the names and mailing addresses of all members and/or slip users.
3. A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use. Note; This
copy is not required if the applicant initials and certifies the following
statements "This is a renewal application and our joint use dock is to be
operated under the same by-laws or agreement originall; ,:.ade in _
(state year) and on file with the City."
Applicant's initials
C. INCORPORATED CLUBS OR ASSOCIATIONS
1. A list of the names, sailing addresses and titles of all corporation off cars.
7. A statement as to the total number of members in the club or association.
_yQ members.
I. A certified copy of the articles of incorporation and by-laws of the corporation.
Note: These copies are not required if the applicant initials and certifies
the following statement; "This is a renewal a1.Slication and our joint use cloak
is to be operated under the same articles of incorporation and/or by-laws as
originally made or last amended in (state year) and on file with the
City..-- New By -Lawn are attached operatinq undm name Articles of Inoorrnration.
ALN _ Applicant's initials
Pace 4 of 5
D. ANNUAL LICENSE FEE - ALL APPLICATIONS
Joint Use Dock License Application fee according to the current
City Fee Schedule.
RENEWAL JOINT USE FEE, per year $ 20.00
PLUS SLIP FEE for each permanent
moorage slip, lift, dry stack,
or buoy 4_slips A $2.00 each $ an on
TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION S •,iin_nn
LATE FEE - Renewals
Applications for renewal of licenses shall be made no later than
February 1 of the license year. The City shall not accept_rAn•••al
license applications received afterer February 1uniess- aft .tion
REVIEW PROCEDURF
When a compl,.e app.-cation is received, the application will be
reviewed by t.-e City Col 1 and, in the case of new or unusual
replications, also by th_ elanning Commission and Marina Committee.
The Council will pass upon t'a application after complete review.
`1E SUBJECT DO„p MAt' BE INSTALLED AND/OR OPENED FOR USE ONLY UPON
APPROVAI. OF ';ME LTCE:NSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
Pursuant to Se<ei-ir 6-42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant
hereby requests ".he Oronr City Council to review this Joint Use Dock
License Application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and
the City's employees and agent- to enter upon the property at any
reasonable time to perform safety and code compliance inspections.
Signed //yi �,Y46_ Date �� %.,j f 5l't1,
11"p. ,
<-- z
Transient facility: no
overnight boat parking.
W
A)4U 2 \_
s a .
w
�O
Q_
I__—
U p
Y
z
O N
J
H
Cwr
N
i V4
IM-yrd
�f&Y-altc
�qjr- Vre
/fK -yro
�ti�-yro
RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO
ISSUE A JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE
TO MINNETONKA POWER SQUADRON
SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN
FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 1967 TO DECEMBER 31, 1988
WHEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafter "City" is a
municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
State of Minnesota and has the authority and responsibility under
Minnesota Statutes, State Statute 412, et. seq. and State Statute 462,
et. seq., to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the
citizens of the City and other members of the public within the City;
and
WHEREAS, the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over the
primary harbor limit of the City of Orono with the Lake Minnetonka
Conservation District and the Department of Natural Resources of the
State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the regulation of the navigable waters involves an
exercise of police power of the State, LMCD, and the City of Orono,
all of which have adopted rules to ensure to all equal enjoyment of
the public rights and equal protection from activity on or near the
public waters and on the land within the City which, if unregulated,
may be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare;
and
WHEREAS, the regulations of the DNR, LMCD, and the City of
Orono regulate the property rights of the riparian owners both as to
residential owners and the commercial marina owners to the extent
prohibiting any interference with the public ._.ers adjoining their
property. The LMCD, DNR and City of Orono must fulfill their
trusteeship over the public waters by protecting against interference
by anyone, including those who assert the commonlaw rights of riparian
owners, whether or not they be commercial marinas or residential
owners;
WHEREAS, as to Lake Minnetonka, a mutual right of enjoyment
exists between and is shared by riparian owners and the public
generally, no one riparian owner has exclusive privileges over Lake
Minnetonka. The only additional private right that any riparian owner
may have over the public generally is to construct one dock to the
avigable depth of the public waters. There can be no dispute but
that the public generally and each riparian owner to Lake Minnetonka
has the right to use the entire surface area of Lake Minnetonka for
all suitable purposes in common with all other riparian owners. This
right is a right not only to members of the public nut the right to
each riparian owner.
Page 1 of 2
This mutual right of enjoyment which is shared by riparian owners and
the public generally includes the recreational benefits of the lake
such as boating and fishing therein; the riparian owner has no
exclusive privileges to these rights; and
WHEREAS, Lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial
beneficial public use only as long as all riparian users of the lake
are regulated in such a way as to ensure there is no abuse of the
limited riparian rights; and
WHEREAS, the City has adopted reasonable regulations
regarding the construction and use of lakeshore and dock facilities
when such facilities are used and maintained by three or more
families, which regulations include the annual licensing of Joint Use
Docks pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to set forth the
above noted general conditions and concerns and the following special
conditions as they relate to an application for an annual Joint Use
Dock License described on Exhibit A attached,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IS RESOLVED, that the City Council of the
City of Orono hereby directs the Staff to issue a Joint Use Dock
License according to the facts and conditions noted on Exhibit A
attached.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono at their
meeting on the 8th day of February, 1988.
ATTFITr
Dorothy M. Rallin, City Clerk
James R. Grabek, Mayor
Paqe 2 of 2
CITY OF ORONO
BXBIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO.
CONDITIONS OF ISSUANCE FOR ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE
I. LICENSEE: Minnetonka Power Squadron
Dock Address: Big Island, Record Lot 45
Agent: William F. Kelly
Address: 351 2nd Street, Excelsior, MN 55331
Licensee is: unincorporated homeowner's group
incorporated homeowner's association
unincorporated club or recreation group
XX incorporated club or recreation group
other
License Period - January 1, 1987 to December 31, 1988
II. BOAT DENSITY
The number of in -place boat slips, lifts and buoys shall not exceed
the number shown on the attached plan, Exhibit B, and in accordance
with Resolution 938, in no case shall the number of authorized boat
slips, lifts, or buoys exceed the number permitted in the prior year's
license.
Authorized Boat Density per attached plan:
Bay Lower Lake
Transient (Day use only) Slips 45
Permanent Moorage Slips
Boat Lifts
Sub -Total: Slips at Dock 45
Offshore Buoys
Maximum Boats in Water 45
Maximum Boats per prior license 45
MAXIMUM BOAT DENSITY -
Exhibit A
Resolution No.
Page 2
Exceeding this maximum boat density, or exceeding the number of
permitted slips, lifts or buoys is a violation of this 11cense subject
to revocation and/or prosecution for violation of Section 5.42
Subdivision 2 of the Orono Municipal Code.
II1. DOCS LAYOUT
The dock structure or layout authorized by this license shall be as
shown on attached Exhibit B. Any changes in this layout shall be
subject to prior review and approval of the City Council.
IV. SPECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinance of
the City and/or the LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to
full compliance with these conditions. Failure to comply with these
conditions is cause for license revocation and/or prosecution by the
City.
NONE
V. Nothing in this license shall confer upon any person for the
benefit of any property any vested right to use Lake Minnetonka or the
premises in a manner permitted by this resolution, but the use of Lake
Minnetonka and the premises shall remain subject to such regulations
and ordinances as the City and other competent regulatory authorities
shall deem necessary from time to time in the public interest.
fyUµl!/UN r
I
CC
EXHIBIT-�--
sz
Z
r
�f�ror �r�\laf �r\•r�fsroro raror�i'w is lr/f
rP/: re!t
ram:
�i
1
u
H
M
u g M
0 N
o y
ss ..
M
lips-qrj
no-
�/7 sun
C:�� ?
CITY OF ORONO` 1
P A Y R O L L R
EMPL-NO NAME DIV GROSS
GROSS EXPp/��AyyL��LyyOWW FIT
El 11 483.34
241.67
et1Y�
C'Hny1L MEETQIB
COETTEN J 11 487.31
241.67
■CALLAHAN
GRABEN J 11 600.00
300.00
PETERSON BA 11 483.34
241.67
FEB -8190
SIME JR WJ 11 483.34
241.67
COUNT GRAND
1,266.68
C OF OM
PAID 00005
TOTAL 00005 TOTAL
TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS .00
EMPLOYERS FICA CONTRIB
A • GROUP HEALTH
B • PHYSICIAN'S HEALTH PLAN
C • BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD
0 • MEDICAL CENTER PLAN
E • PRUDENTIAL
F . COORD. HEALTH CARE
G • MINNESOTA MHO
H • TRANS-AMERICA OCC.
I • BANKERS LIFE
J • MUTUAL SERVICES
K • MUTUAL OF OMAHA
L • EMPLOYEE'S BENEFIT
M • AETNA
N • NICOLLET EITEL
0 • LEAGUE OF CITIES
P • METROPOLITAN HEALTH PLAN
0 - SHARE
Z w HEALTH CARE MAINT ACCT.
HISSING HOSP CODE FOR SOME
EMPL'S
CITY OF ORONO P A
,/,' t /-cR (/-pi Y-T-D • _ - _
EMPL-NO NAME DIV CROSS GROSS EXP/AL
ANDERSON BL 31 2761.95 1440.67
BERNHAROSO ME 12 38S6.81 1988,40
BOBZIEN SA 31 1635.20 822.40
BOBMA JL tE 762.86 385.64
BRINKHAUS JF 42 3413.12 1935.38
CHESWICK GB 31 2819.49 1418, 00
CORNICK JL 31 E359.09 1297.80
DENNE80N RJ 35 351.90 214.80
ELDER JA JS 0.00 0.00
ENGLISH II iH 31 2353.06 IIS3.00
ERICKSON DJ 93 0.00 0.00
ERICKSON KR 31 2827.74 14t S.00
FICHENICH DT 31 2292.19 1187.03
FRITZLER JM 31 3161.51 17S2.13
GAFFRON MP 33 2317.86 1166.40
GERHARDSON JR 42 3253.12 t636.08
GREGORY JD 42 2664.06 1569.21
HALLIN DM 12 2046.00 1030.00
HANSEN SC 42 2266.41 1300.9E
HANSING CJ 31 885.70 428.32
HOOGENAKKE JE 31 165.00 155.00
JACOBS TJ 33 2317.8S 1166.40
JOHN30N BP 31 2498.40 1249.20
KILBO MH 31 3339.01 1675.76
KIRNYCZVK M 31 10S6.70 S29.3S
KNOTT NJ 33 0.00 0.00
KNUTSON CA 15 1398.37 740.16
KUEHN TM 15 3190.11 1604.40
LINDSTROM DJ 93 0.00 0.00
MABUSTH JA 33 ES19.97 141S.24
MEYER MA 3S 22.95 22.95
MIKELSON RA 15 153S.97 772.48
MILLS JR WH 93 0.00 0.00
MORAN MF 31 3175.46 1803.41
MOROWCZYNS J 31 ETE7.94 1366.31
MORROW JS 31 221.00 221.00
MROSS FT 61 9.00 0.00
NAAS TL 12 1635.20 822.40
OAS DO 93 0.00 0.00
OMAN LE 33 1900,80 956.00
PALMER PB 31 80.00 80.00
PETERSON PL 12 864. 62 451.32
PETERSON RW 93 0.00 0.00
PFTRAN JC 33 0.00 0.00
OUAST WA 9E 2319.86 1318.10
ROSS JA 93 0.00 0.00
SASS JJ 42 2302.38 1336,89
SCHAUSS CR 31 1916.61 1010.04
SKREEN 08 4E 2301.33 1300.92
SMITH JR 92 2092 07 1107.67
STEFFENHAG RE 93 2133 09 1072.80
fl
3
CITY OF ORONO P A
Y-T-D • - - - -
EMPL-NO NAME DIV CROSS CROSS EKP/ALI
STILES RC 61 0.00 0.00
THOMTON MR 31 E035.05 979.1E
TOMCHECK LF 31 E031,60 1061.E9
TOMCZYK MU 31 E670.94 1323.37
UALSH KL 31 0.00 0.00
COUNT GRAND _..___ 17, 668./6
PAID 00011
TOTAL 00056 -- TOTAL - {
TOTAL FICA TAX -GROSS • ___414aL7t.St-- DLOT{Iltl
A . GROUP HEALTH
9 PHYSICIAN'S HEALTH ►LAiI------
C • BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD__.
D MEDICAL CENTER PLAN
E • PRUDENTIAL
F COORD. HEALTH CARE
G • MINNESOTA HMO
M . TRANS-AMERICA OOZ..._—_.._
I BANKERS LIFE
7 MUTUAL SERVICES
0 • MUTUAL OF OMAHA
L • EMPLOYEE'S BENEFIT
M • AETNA
N • NICOLLET EITF.L
0 • LEAGUE OF CITIES
P METROPOLITAN HEALTH PLAN
0 - SHARE
2 HEALTH CARE MAINT ACCT.
MISSING HOSP C09E FOR SOME EMPL'S
1968 CITY
OF ORONO
CHECK 011616TER
�- CHECK
NO. DATE._ -.
AMOMNT.
VEMSM
ITEM DESCRIPTION
009006
N/ARIM
14.94
ACRO-MINN[SOTA INC
OFFICE
"PLIES
079006
__ mve3m ____
16.E
ACRO-MIMME60TA INC
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
' 009006
wq/0R
33.72
ACRO-MIMMESOTA INC
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
' 009006
W03MB
SR.66
ACRO-MINNESOTA TUC
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
039006
- /R7/N._
_I6.44 _—
ACRO-MIMMEEOTA INC
OFFICE
SUPPIIES
039006
wOLM
16.E
ACRO-MIUN[60TA INC
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
_
` 039006
WSW"
11416.N
ACRO-MINMENTA IMC
CHAIRS
_T[[.N. R_
•»0H
w07gs
rl.
it___j R14
w23m
_ --_ncoo, _-._
ALL-STM- RutTRt{1_.
POOR M"MLPL"T
JL
n6.N
079E27
wN/M
on. 00
APPLE VALLEY AGENCT
HERE CSPlVTO IN
g902T.
wSIVM
_. _.-11S,.N
E�ML[ VALLEY ANNCL_„ILp_IM___
A
677.041 •
_
039030
WIZARD
639030
w_IRAN,
SS9000
wOLM
039070
wpFM
�b]; •»NR wAKlR
•
A»AN wAVM
0»HR WOW"
i
AT
e T
two mm
MTA PROCRSSING
AT
6 T
two SHTSII__
NTA PROCESSING
_
AT
A T
two SYSTMI
MTA PROCESSING
AT
A T
IWO OYS70
MTA PROCESSING
_ AT
A T
TWO STSTlljI__MTA
PROCESSI«
AT
A T
TWO $TOM
DATA PROCESSING
AT S T CM TELEPHONE:
0e-08-04 PACE 1
ACCOUNT NO INV E P 0 E MEE6AIE
01-4916-039-12
01-6R11-OS9-19
01-0210-069-IS
01-.e10-1e9-TI
01-4e1-114-3
0I-4210-291-4e
14-9s90-129-00
-0I20-11S-E4
r2-434S-549-91
01-1260-060-00
01-9370-099-17
01-9100-039-12
01-9I90-PSI-19
01-4300-069-I S
01-9290-IeI-31
01-9390-179-33
01-4310-209-92
01-9I20-129-I1
__ _t»,N __
M.AM01NN�1_!MN
EEC,1_RAE OAYI¢—_.
AHI•I-0H-N1
17�.M •
0.75
CAPITOL R 0D
N"a OLIO
AI-ERt"39-to
VTIL M MINT NML
01-AtlA-[N-91
Vol .0E-
OMILL MET
NLN
CAENLL IMLT
VEIL M PRINT SUPPL
Ot-9ti0-SH-91
761_441-.-_
MLT
R. SITE MINT ft. L
72-0214-S49-91
-- — T61.N •
____—
_
CITY
OF Ot•M
E!w EEQMm
E1-e8-06 tAu t
r
--INS
Y' <Ct tt,-MIS._
_.
MItOIT
ITM t •MII•Tltt
.000UNt NO ENV
• t 0 E .,SINGE
'
E•i
f
•L__emn
waEw __
. m_p .
aura 6 • MM_ew
wen erTrCKS
3N.p
Mai
••
e311M
weLN
514.91
c..+.VT IUOWMN
a"= LYMMTIw
e8-63441-174-33
•
- ------------
---- - - -
--------J1EJ1
So
-COCIIEL-SaMir --
JANITOR 6UV JRS
et-as-eN-IT
•"
939131
411/63M
eM.N
WNW cm MINE wr
NMETOR SMEV SEES
41-6344-I1S-31
•
039143
Sde3/M
9.56
COMMERCIAL LIFE 110
LIFE IM ew
•1-SI Sl-ON-E¢
•'•
039143
we1/M
2.76
COMMUCIAL LE tN
LIFE IM eNE
01-41162-e61-IS
•
_-.H
COMIMCM LIFE INS
LIFT. "" Sw_-_
0Ib1St-Itl-31
439143
wN/M
3.60
COMMERCIAL LIFE INS
LiFr .M♦
0I-6ISC-It6-31
. •`;
139143
w63iM
9.90
COMMERCIAL LIFE IN!
LIF. w
41-41SC-I29-31
'—e19713
wqM_-
- --� 3.60
COMENCIAL LIFE INS
LIM .. Aw -
tl-EIU-IT4-11
Pa
NSf63
wgAt
E.40
COMMERCIAL LIFE INS
LIFE IM Fw
01-61N-919-4¢
1-
4"M
wRVM
.Tt
COMMERCIAL LIFE ENE
LIFE IRA ew
71-611IM-S49-91
•
COMMERCIAL LIFE INS
LIFE INS ew
T 41141-S69-9t
539163
wq/N
.90
COMMERCIAL LIFE IN
LIFE IM Fw
76-61N-Ell-93
C ^
35.19 .
•
-
-- — -
- - -- ----- ---
- -- _-- - -- - _-
...-C[6
MN••
-
••
•
'•.J3EL6Y
wJyEt
--
CROW M� eTY•
�*�.m.._
EI-.]M-ethll
MAE
ILSS
et"
e3t1N
WOZ M
11.315.98
E S IwMISt t tEw
macoo M ASEAN SELL
12-6536-3911-N
•
•NN.
e]NEa
OVUM
---}i:Ys---- tPIPSlN1feN�Yt - wNl wrtw
11.M
WsINESs SERVICE _ to SMITH nvm#ELE
W.N
p.N SOL= VALLEY a
AMINO
01-6303-060-16
7E-434S-549-91
61-4356-1 ¢9-31
it" CITY
OF OROMO
CHECK REGISTER
OE-48-66 PAGE _
— CHECK MO.
DATE _
..OMIT _
7EMD00
ITEM DESCRIPTION
AC' 40. IMV
0 P.O. 0 MESSAGE
R•
071E66
0E/03/69
—. taB.ai
GOPHER OIL CO
FUEL A LUB
a1-.E20-249-4111
03726C
02/OL411
In."
GOPHER OIL CO
FUEL A LUB
01-4E2o-2I0-61
en.ta .
AA
AA
�B11BHM
wtl/N __.
- _ J!J•_
M6M-LEyBly711E__._ _-IRiIlM
EI-qN-Elf-1!
a7•!!1
wa7M
7.7f
IYLLIWNNTIM
MIN.!
Bt-O7B/17•-1a
If.71 .
•
��
.NN.
_
— —
----------
---"-
-
1{+� .NN.7
Nip/,8---
IBBJa
I0 S7ti.0ga7t_lTRC_
Boost
p-/7♦MIa•-»
•
1� E»e•7
wB7AB
fi.N
_
IB[M rn GMIIh n)C
.
BOIML . _._
N-17♦B-It•-at
.
1M'
1{1
no. Be
Ir N.N.
— _-_.-___
_.-_—__
_ _ _
__ wMB
.. _.__._—_
•
_)»»L
wpM
J.•».7B_—_.Jt1alSTCJIMJIY____-afEBl.
Ja1LSwIa1B
•1�43-441-SO
1.•».la .
wi
M.N.
--
_
_—__ _ __-_
- — __
- -- •..'AB
a39330
BNgM
at.•i
.CAA R[iMR C0M7
ICY 1-11 TO 1-416
^ 0»3u
w•7/u
----_-19.I6
INTERSTATE BATTERY -
MI• SAM
7a-Q»-N•-•/
6797R
waaM
M."
INTERSTATE BATTERY
BASIN /ANTS
77-41S»-669-1111
.
.7_•s
-
--
.NN�
.N-M
e
I" a»»7
aa/Q/N
46.24
HI-THOMM _—.___MILtlM
JY
HWb-611"s
6»»7
Wa!/M
•.»
■ULHN-TMONAS
MLLBYB Sr
a1-Sul-17h»
a
.7fff7
.apLY
_{,jJ
RUEMN-i HOMAS
MILBYB JM_
7!-qBl-aq-11
a»»7
6k. •71"
0."
MUEMN-THOMMAS — -
_.
-MILBMB JY -
77-I»1if: ".71
-
61.67 •
E
......
-- _
'-
.... INS
-
0324E
wa7A!_
17.71 _ _
_71i LM= _
PUBLISHING
01-a22-01/-12
1•N
wesm
111 70
vm LMM
PUBLISHING
01-43E2-114-77
AS
.E. 00 -
ASd
_!»•N
Wtll/Y ----
too to
_.NBJIABpMOORAM ---LPC_Or
aiwll_
a1-.700-02•.-11
Io6. ao
-i 079QI
walvu
67J78.60
LIICIT ISO STY Rla1{
POMEa im
01-12E0-000-00
"
F
IOp CITY OF O CHECK RECICTER 02-66-48 P.GE
r
AMOUNT VEMpOR UIM DEICS VTION ACCOUNT 44 1xV 6 F 0. • RE950GE
IT, 1t2. 00 • �
• — RNNR — _ �- •v a
J716q
NA1/NE __
___A.6O._ ._L""6.
W-IN-MIES
NR6N6
i
E39433
EN/Q/N
670.0E
NICHOL" LBOM
SOUL/TM Slow Se
12-4570-399-00
.NN.
E794134
wgAO
65E.00
Lml$ MITE I" ---
ork-M 67 OOTO FROC
01-2040-OCJ-00
$3943E
wq/p
4.20
LOEI*f"ITN Me
C01O m M
79-0167-S09-9e
—49T.60S
$30E77
wellm
E7.75
OIT1f M LOM{ LIIR—
"SIN JU IMi9 --
01-2224-000-00
030437
w67/0"ll
9.419.79
CITY OF LENS LM1N
4m an WTY1
7e-2220-000-00
.NN.
j 67N7f
welm
6.49
LOW LJI F TYICM
MIP MTO
01-4¢3e-249-4e
I`
6.48
039446
_
wELM
_
01-42J2-1eT-71
f.1T
R]SS6l
wS7/RN__.
_ 16.00 _.
IRFR6
NNIgOMIM
01-4390-129-71
I-222N.
10.00 .
0394176
wO7/041
16.688. 11
N[1RO WASTE CONTROL
F9 0omme
73-1A¢-000-00
-4A N._U!—
a6e9E we3t"
IO.tl-----RIMNECMCO --_ UTILITIES
4". 36 RINNECRSCO UTILITIES
NO, NO__—___ RINKOMCO __ UTILITIES
671.61 0
1O1 OOIRIFIT 6OM LIFE INS JIN I FEN
61- 31!4-129-II
01-4152-129-71
It" CITY
OF MONO
CKCK MOf OTSN
02-64-115 PACE 5
_CHECK M0.
DATE _.
AMOUNT
WSKSM
_in" DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO INV
9 A 0 f MESWE
�Y
J7li6
"As
m Fiat i awm_--_—MtNT
RISC EQUIP
01-43.¢-I99-3I
51.N
el.
�A
13110f
1d57/N
151.N
m OR" PM SM[TT
9TH OTR CHARGE
01-epee-000-00
0mit
wS7A5
a.N
1060A-WID MSFFIY
MENIIERSHIP3
01-4380-1e9-31
ft. of
1m11
w07/N
ref66
ISI lm -[CMIt ff�
IIEIISUEHIrE
o1-nse-+H-]+
i
7ef.N .
*]fc00
ARQ)/10"
."J.DNJO_
HINN VC "RD
OC- .__
01-eeet-080-00
705E5
02197/N
I.11111.N
HINN UC FUND
OC-IICOMMM
01 -YL¢¢-000-00
039505
9e/OLeS-
al. Be
HINN UC FUND
W-1TtL00
01-eeLY-000-00
--
...1�
1
� •NM•
•..-CRf
i
Bm75
wo3m
1e,91t.N
CITY OF mourn—
Flu FlwilSr i711 -
61-4311-139-3e
��
lY, •i 1.00
RON -- -
UTILITIES
01-gH-1e9-31
-01-.3Y.-ew-a
s 1mN
wU/N
194.00
NCP
-UTILITIES - --- "-
17f55f
wN/N
5.50
NSP
UTILITIES
01-43t1-t10-{I
16.57-
ASP
UTILITIES
01-41Y4-5f0-{1
0mN
w07/N
:5. 0]
ASP
UTILITIES
73-43N-569-92
Of.H .
-
_:79ii0
0L/0
54.30
NORTHWESTERN BELL
TELEPHONE
- 01-.390-059-1¢
019St1
84
9e/93/00
S..tS
NORTHWESTERN BELL
TELEPHONE
01-.7t0-059-1.
Ozma
:e/a/N
61.15
NORTHWESTERN BELL
TELEPHONE
01-93t0-0f9-15
- H.S.
NORTHWEOTERN BELL
TELEPHONE
0/d3tf-Ie1-31
0395i0--J2/03[0O--__
0395f0
0e/03/N
5.. 10
NORTHWESTERN BELL
TELEPHONE
si-43eo-i74-33
07f5f0
0e/Ol/:e
13].80
NORTHWESTERN BELL
TELEPHONE
H-.3¢0-1T5d.
012540_9p(03130
54. 10
NO:THWE9TE:N :ELL
TELEPHONE
:1-43t0-¢49-9¢
0795{:
OQ/07/S6
10.:9
NO BELL
TELEPHONE
7b0]e0-5.1-91
O7f5f1
OQi 31
16.Y9
NORTHWESTERN BELL
TRUE
T[L[iNOBE
73-4t0-569-9¢
1_--0195A0
0L/11/N _
___ --_71.50._.
NORTHWAITERN BELL.- _
HO TELEPNE
H -4320-S90-1]
:795{S
WOW"
105.40
NORTHWESTERN BELL
ADVERTIBINC
70-41e3-510-91
«
N].N .
•••«•
... CK:
•�'
r�
S]9AIA
NgyN__
- _LfL-•0-_
_ JiNtO1t1[5_OSCIOfONO—COW
USSTH COMILT
01-4300-e19-7¢
1188 CITY
OF ONONO
CHECK REGISTER
I�1lr
.CNECN NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
•
242.40
.
_
-- _
_
ICI .N..•
�J71ERI_
Ot/OJ/N-
_L. MS.SB
PMYSICI%WS HEALTH
H09P INS FES
079ER1
01/03/SS
632.55
PHYSICIANS HEALTH
HOBP INS FES
679611
OL/sv0e
752.00
PHYSICIANS WEALTH
HASP IRS FES
35N1__
_At/OLN _
434.15
PHYSICIANS WEALTH
N08F INS Fan
F 6»621
02163M
1.006.15
PHYSICIANS HEALTH
HOBP :No FES
079621
09/07/89
N0."
PHYSICIANS HEALTH
Hasp INS FES
632681
e9/63M — -__
704.to
PHYSICIANS HEALTH
MOSP INS no
079621
GOMM
41.02
PHYSICIANS HEALTH
HASP INS In
•'°
071621
evemm
62.73
PHYSICIANS HEALTH
HASP INS on
_
..4.610.73
•
_
-
__
_
1I•
1 •N•N
L
_ __
e2/07/6e
e9.00
PITN[T NM8
POSTAGE
e79ERT
on. 079W
e2/67/40
l9.90
MOST am$
POSTAGE
"J7!•t9
•V OveB
_ _ 29.00
__
_. PITNEY BOYEB_
POSTAGE
0716&1
OV03/88
e9.90
PITNEY ROM
POSTAGE
•" 0794R7
0t/03/89
e9.40
PITNEY BONES
POSTAGE
.
031627
30.60
_
FITNEY BONES
HAIRY RISC EOCIP
039627
_02/03/98 _
02/03/88
30.60
PITNEY BODES
PRINT RISC EQUIP
•-0 OJ96e1
62/03140
30.60
PITNEY BONES
RAINY RUC EQUIP
.
0396ei
62/03/88
30.60_
___PITMT
$OYES
MAINT RISC EQUIP
v39627
_
02/03,88
30,60
PITNEY DONE$
RAINY RISC EQUIP
'�".
•'•.
J40.00
.
49e.68.
____POME.
MAKE EQUIP
EQUIP PARTS_ _
IR-
HE.N
1-1
67967T
W67/SB
MIS
POLICE 1WN0NM AM
PERIMIMU
- e.59
PRUDENTIAL
LIFE INS FES
9—
W67/M
_
11881{
e776Q1
WO7/BS
tl.tl
PRUDENTIAL
LIFE INS FEB
L—;32&e1_
__._-
- - ._. 6.6e__.
PRUDENTIAL _ __
LIFE INS FESw
839642
__JV07/N
62/03/e8
9E.00
PRUDENTIAL
LIFE INS FEE
ej
07947
02101/86
1.46
PRUDENTIAL
LIFE IN FED
0»M7�V0004_
S.18-__
PRUDENTIAL
LIFE INS FES
I�
M
IPS •
•I'i 079M
68/97/N
a. of
S C IMENTIFICATIOM
PERSON" Etl11P
�'F •NM•
J
6l-u-6e 6
ACCOUNT NO INV 9 F 0. • e...
e1-TS72-060-00
91-41St-039-It
01-11S1-069-IS
61M1S1-1l6-JI
AI-U51-121-11
01-61S1-1T9-JJ
61-9151-599-92
T2-4151-69-9
11-9151-561-92
01-9321-039-I E
01-I3t1-059-t4
01-9321-619-Is
01-4321-174-33
01-43et-299-92
01-9190-039-12
01-9390-O59-I9
01-I190-069-
01-4j90-1 76-33
01-9390-299-92
$1-92U-C99-92
01-4240-129-11
01-91S2-019-12
01-41 S1-0611-15
11-9152-126-31
01-4152-129-11
01-4152-114-33
01-915l-N9-92
01-4R21-129-11
F+�i
I+N CITY
OF N•10
am= ENINEII
et-e6-66 P.OE
r
CHECK N..
NB__. _ __. MIEMI7__.
_ NMI.__._ .._.
ITEM DESCRIPTION
RCCOUNT NO INv
• P 0 + MF SstCF
Ir
.
•y.
639666
ERNI. Mn E7NPI6
OFFICE q/fL1E9
01-•el e-Oa+-15
•
ST. TE •
e
i'
•' ollt»
6F67/M
I.if•.N
1A•LLUD OIL N
el-1[a+-eee-oo
•
•.__O3f6TE_y!)10E_
•-•y tl -
ML►7116 6IL N__...... __m
WAI
EM EMKtM
el -lea l-eoe-oo
o.6N.N •
•
"
...-0f5
�'••
431YT
OVUM
6.N
O fML NEE
OFFICK EIof s1w
01-+et O-l9.43
•
J76Yt
NeiILY-__ _
-JJ�__IT.
IML_MN
Win Mf g=
24-4311-46e-00
;�
le.n .
•
•f
..
01I-r 039490
we7/66
04.N
SHOREWOOD OIL 6WRNEE
M6INT 6LN6
01-+3e3-011-17
•
�_0T6E6—
—6VELN_
tl-N__
SHOREWOOD OIL fUNNEE
Mnlw ELou _ _
14-4343-510-13
n•.« •
....CRY
•
gE6N
6dE3M
LE6i.N
SENIOR E•EI mvim
/K PC IaEEN
01-4365-100-21
•
Fes^
-
j 67E/lt
awomme
E11
STNTE-ISI OOCURTS
t0003
tl
•1-41N-71
•
104.60•
...-CNt
•N•N
•
-t' E767N
_6V_67/N_.__
_M-" _
STREICHERS
OFFICE SUPPL
•1-f1E-11F 7t
0397S6
Y/63/N
167.N
STRETCHERS
EQUIP PARTS
•
M6.N
-.—
. ..-us
...•••
•
�7679e
TWIN CITIES O1Cri�_
MI11T RECOEDERS
e1-440-031-Ie
__6E/03/88
67+1+e
_ _-._67.50
0E/67/98
16.00
SWISS CITIES EI CTN N
MINT RECORDERS
G1-U+0-0e9-IS
•
67679E
0e/03/411
306.06
TWIN CITIES DICri INMINT
RECORDER[
41-e3+0-1e+-31
OE/O3/SS
_
TWIN CITIES Oltri •f _
MINT RECORDERS
61-I:FO-1T.-33
••' 67179t
02/03/80
__t1E.S0.
EVEN
TWIN CITIES OICri INMINT
RECORDERS
O1-43e0-249-eY
IN
0"?Ie
aR/03/96
11E.66
TWIN CITIES EICri N
MINT RECONOE[f
73-4340-561-12
- f00.00 -
_
.... CM5
•
No
•••M.
- --
--t7l.tE-
YIIiFEE1D MLI1�t70
GM116K---
61-een-le6-3F
•
67t1»6
6E/83/1,11
SN»f
62/63/86
114.115
URINIIS OSLMITN
QNNIM
01-e221-le+-31
-4--H796_
_ Jt/07/66 _.
167. Os
mif061r WILtNETO
CLW"tM_
01-e396-171-�+
elt.s0 .
•
•Ir:
•..-Ca6
ml CITr K MSN@
CHECK Stl10OS
PACE .
'
_MECILSO__MR_. __
AMOUNT _
- VENOW _ - -_—. _.11Ell
99000IPTIM
ACCWNT NO INV
. ♦ . nE5 AAGX
��I—E7MEL--w.yM_
]E.E,
VILLAGE CHEVROLET
MP PMTE
n-497E-949-49
32,24 .
•.
1wEl/N
:1
IN.N
1MTM MMYCTE CO7K.TEE
7E-1e13-900-00
-1 -
194.0.
II
.. .-CN.
.
� •NN•
.a WE Elf
691.75-
v It01 MCrCLIM an -KerCLElr
MMEM
.1'•7.E'E..'.E
691 TS •
•
17
0.40
fEI1N1UOE1_/LECIIIC__._V[LJTI-___
__-
•
....
• .-CIt.
NPN._ -
•fir 670N1 w.7/K
.5. 0.
IIIIMBO LOOS 0 M19
116IIIT WIN IN►1
EI-QN-ITFA
.HfM waP66
66.0.
EMEE ,.o1ICGS NEE
110711T SIK 6BBM
N•AY-IM�7/
•
076M7 w67/N
35.00
M M
LINIISSB
H-KnE.GoE-T,
1h
031"M54 w.yM
ETO...
E E E CMINN
OEM MEMISE
E1-4117E.IEF71
•
.+
.T1. 16
I w67/K
164. 00-
COLE PUBLICATION@
.alma"
E1•4601-1EF7E
•
•,` 076.K
IN.CO
COLE PUBLICATI ONS_
PR&IE"___—_-E1-YM-IEF7B
-- _
.766$ w.v66
(^� 029M O/.7/M
_ _
164.60
COLS PWLI GTlM0
0MIEN6IY.S
01-N.0�1M-71
•
I64.66 •
6766K llfv�
EMS 1,40111 CC
61 M
C1-47N-qFO
-
•
SO.N •
-
076KT w.vM
- �1s-�i __.
wM1YgTw Q1�IE Ir
r�li C�ie11L�
Ci-4240-601-71
•
IO.N .
u 7.6N 6BL7/M
7B.N_--
IMSM W p —
WCN NML[Y
071669 w67/M
tN.-jC
CMIISIIN@ L ELR CO
-_
MS[1
_61-6E/6-IE1-71
61-.E..-t[,-1,
•
a
101.M •
076616 w67/M
A.N
MMT T.6p
OMlit -
C -.e, o-al,-ie
A.N
i
17.111 w671K
-
7.Tf7.6.
NEL aIICSRL
-T.BO
11IiN6 SEYM-iM'li
Ih.S.o-Ces-oc
e
1CIIT
1N r �0110
DI{{'It Ee-os-u PALE
RN UTtl
r1i
UNT
AMOUNTale_
EIAM.—_
J7(II DERCRIFTION ACCOUNT NO INV E P 0 E NESS�LE
rr9
•.., s
'
Ia.ass. 07
FUND
01 TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
11.140.1E
FUND
12 TOTM.
PARK FUNO
4.260,10_
FUND
14 TOTAL
IMPROVE E EOUIP OUTLAY F
0.94
FUND
N TOTAL
PERM IMPROVE REVOLVING F
T. RR. 14
F11ND
TE TOTAL
PATER OPERATING FUND
_
_14.916.44
FUND
T7 TOTAL
SEVEN OPERATING FUND
RIT.N
FUND
74 TOTAL
GOLF COURSE OPERATING FO
C
144,024,49 _.
TOTAL
_
•
GEOUNIS FINANCIAL SYSTEM
01!•VN PACE
__ ACCOUNTING REPORT.
"ED
Of 19414 CITY OF MOM
�—
--
- NUMBER OF REPORTS
7
U►DRT[ 0 e=l"IM
•
FIBADCIAL BRUNSTo
"UNDER OF VPOATE•
S
UNARY FTC[
I
RCMOIIL s NA DATE_
*UNDER OF RECORDS
PAYROLL
A
S T NATO NNM
--LEVEL
-----
1
1,07E
D[MEFIT ADCMML
LEVEL I
e_
ACTIVITY R[FNT
•
ACTIVITY DIBRTD
Aam 7
e
CHECK mism
1
WOIR.O BIM MT[ 01[
REPORT BATE
LOUR I
e
TRIAL BALANCE
•
—
LEVEL E
[I
BALANCE @NM
—
—
-
LpLL E
S
REVENUE BTAT131M
•
MMILL PNTIW Alp NNN
J
LINK T
e
OPERATION STATSFAW
• NNN
LIVIL / _
_ _ _ e
B00GET NmTmcm
•
LEVEL 9
L
CLEM-dMO-NOMIM
• NNN
LEVEL 9
[
CITY FILE COTIOD
• N••••
PS]D1[CT ]DEPARTMENT
IT
TOTAL
I,N1
HOST OF ACCOUNTS
_ TEAR to JATE PERIOD •I
MOM SECBAD• CREATED S
1968 CITY
OF WORD
CHECK
REGISTER
61-06-6R ISs 1
CHECK NO.
DATE _
_AOUN
VENDOR
ITEM pEIGIITl4
eflQiM[... IM._i P.i_* "RIR➢K
J1
079066
01/25/6s
141.71
ACRO-NINNESOTA
INC
OFFICE SUIILis
RI-MI6.679-10
_039006 _
01/25/06_.
N.s
•LRp-IIIMME•OTA_IMC
OFFICE SUPPLIER_
sl-Nli-E/R-11___
'
019006
01/25/88
s.N
ACRO-MINNESOTA
INC
OFFICE SUPPLIER
- -
61-+Is• o"ll
'
079006
01/25/N
90.66
ACI10-MIMNES0TA
INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
61-. :9^71
'1
67f006
_01/25/[s
___94.67
ACRO-MIMMEIOT-
INC_
OFF'C[ SUPPLIES
R1-. 'h
'
679606
Cl/9S/6S
Sl."
OCRO-IIINNE60TA
INC
OFFICE SUPILt[:
_
—61-
07.19
_#1
97f1]0
•1/!!/11a
f1.7t
OR�Al1j_Ol��(R_INS Cp
jff M JMI
o"Is-IM-11__
039110
HJSJs
76.s
GILRRK Llil' INS CO
LESS-
1s.H A
;1
- .-_079i11
_ R1/s/s
{.N
CON01[RCllll_ LIR_
IRS
LIPS 100 JAI
Ri NIEO-/79-1R
'
O19143
ws/s
0.75
CONERCIAI LIFE
IMR
LIR
I6p
JOY
i1-119s-H9-Tf ---
a.
619111
01/2R/M
!.H
COIKRCIAI LIR
100
LIFE In JAI
6t-Ilw-I91-71
_079197.___
01/75/RR
S •
mlRl[IIL[OL_L/FE
JRR_LJR_INS
JAI_
Rt-IIM-1N-01
439143
Ot/25/p
S.N
COMMERCIAL LIFE
INS
LIFE INS JAM
61-It EE-IH-Rt
'
039143
01/25/66
3.00
CSIMIERCIAL LIFE
INS
LIFE I" JAN
61-41E2-174-71
O19143
01/05/66
S.H
CpINERCIAL LIFE
IN{
LIFE INS JAI
N-PIES-019-IS
'
039111
01/K/N
.7E
CONIIERCIAL LIFE
INS
LIFEINS JAM-
°
0]919]
01/2S/N
I."
COINS➢CIA. LIFE
INS
LIFE INS JAR
77-OISO-069-9O
_ _019111
-➢1/2Vu
91
SD"WCM LIR_
INS_.
UFJI_INj_ LY_
7"Is-R7EN-
75.16
6TRlf
OlfLli—_.
{1f275
•7f275
01/2S/s 006.17 OSY NSA.TM INC
I1114.114 Is NON IRS JAN 7N15*-S96-97
0l9l]6 OI imsw 6 01.96 IOM R2101RII ow ION la A 70 Im 61-01 a --
01.96 A
a3.,.___➢1/R.R. 9.6R EE•----"s Rt}t6N6 _ _�-Ia6-tn-�1
9.12 A
679167
039467
Ws/N
170.01
039467__
�1/s/s
7St�i
019467
WaILl"
76.41
039467
H/SSJs
065.61
It" fiFT
OF OaONO
CMECM aECIBTO
Mia-Y
►am E
1
--DATE
Mrnlr
VEMOOA
_._I)ma1.EVEiLTIY
aeBBYr
T
I.IN.s .
I
i
JIB
T-AA
MM_M3I rIT. ANN
LIFE IIL4 JAIL_
•/-alftly/ti1
_
'I
gf//L
41/{f/N--
1./0
LEI BENEFIT ACEM
LIVE INS .4f1
'i
17149E
fl/asm
E.19
1N1 DEW IT AGSM
LIVE IN 1144
71-{CY�[fhN
1
. u .
.«O.
N.-Yf
a
of
MYDEIITIAL
a39443
{I/Efw1
E. EI
LIRE in )all
39643
N/EE/U
11.61
PRUDENTIAL
LI/E IY JY
01-4t§n-os s
..�
'iffa7
�1/ES/ff
A ..
«ImEETIAL—_ _.
LIFE tlta JY
DIyfY�llf-ll _.
_
039643
41/Ef/{
4I.4{
MDOIIITIAL
LIFE 11H JAM
a1M1Y-1E9-it
639{43
01 /af/:
LN
MIAEMTUL
LIFE /Y JIN
0I-4IE0-Ir432
a'y
__fila47_fl/ES/a/_
B_49
MWMTIAI.__—__
- ---
-
n.1f.
^r
-
R.431.51
9M1A1WD /1 IOTA
OBNW SWISS
T*:Y
TI TOTAL
"M OMAT IMa BYY
_
.—
T] TOTAL_
MY
---
tta.n
FIRMS T. TOTAL
o011
ow GaMoATtir
FE
1_w_Tl
TOTAL
b
71
a
y'
1
�1
nl
u
M
(1Ouric)I
PUBLIC ATTENDANCE K j�
CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE
LEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTS FLOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS.
NAME OR NUMBER
NA14E (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda)
2.
3.
s.
I/
0.
I.
.a.
3.
L4.
_
L5.
16.
19.
20.
_
1E +e0000 fyq% S
COu.n t� 1
ot
FES -a 1988
CITY OF ORONO
To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members
City Administrator Bernhardson
From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
Date: February 4, 1988
Subject: #1241 Otten Brothers Nursery and Landscape, Inc. -
650 Willow Drive - Sketch Plan/Conceptual Review -
Information Item for Council Only
Staff has enclosed a sketch plan application reviewed by the Planning
Commission at their January 27th, 1988 meeting requiring no action on the
part of the Planning Commission or the Council. The packet is submitted
for your information only. Please contact staff if you have any questions.
/U
To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley
Orono Planning Commission Members
City Administrator Bernhardson
From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
Date: January 13, 1988
Subject: 11241 Otten Brothers Nursery and Landscape, Inc. -
650 Willow Drive - Sketch Plan Review
Zoning District - RR-lB
Recommended Zoning Per Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Commercial
Retail/Office on south side of frontage road and multiple dwelling use
on north side providing appropriate transition use for existing single
family development within Ringers Wood Plat.
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A - Application
Exhibit B - Applicant's Addendum
Exhibit C - Ringers Wood Plat
Exhibit D - Plat Map
Exhibit E - Pertinent Comprehensive Plan Sections
Exhibit F - Scheme A
Exhibit G - Scheme D
The applicant has been advised by the City staff that the filing of
this application is considered premature and that the Planning Commission
will be unable to provide clear directives for future development as we
have yet to develop performance standards for development along the
corridor. The Metropolitan Council has not formally approved the
Comprehensive Plan and it appears it will not until mid -February. The
performance standards will not be realized until the end of summer or early
fall.
The applicant fully understands the concerns of the City staff in
accepting the application and is fully aware of the limited review and
results of the sketch plan review conducted at this time.
Applicant's addendum (see Exhibit B) notes specific items for
consideration. Staff has met and outlined broad planning topics/issues
based on the guidelines and the framework established within the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment that must be addressed when planning the
future development of this site (Area 5). Absent performance standards,
the two sketch plans submitted will not be addressed in specifics.
Applicant's ProposAl -
Proposed use - retail garden center, management and design
headquarters, and installation/construction division - involves outdoor
storage of plantings (trees, shrubs), model garden displays, landscape
supplies, equipment storage (both enclosed and stored in open yard), office
areas, and retail (both interior and exterior).
Zoning File #1241
January 13, 1988
Page 2 of 3
Issues for Applicant -
1. Type of business - proposed use, is it acceptable?
2. Parking locations.
3. Access.
4. Proposed landscaping.
5. Compatibility with corridor requirements or considerations.
Topics/Issues Appropriate for City to Address at this Time -
1. Use. Per Exhibit E-2, 3, 4, staff considers this specific commercial
use very compatible with adjacent residential uses. The City would ask for
dedication of a permanent landscape buffer along north lot line immediately
adjacent. to Dickey Lake Drive to insure permanent screening from commercial
use to south. The narrow depth of this corridor, even at the west end at
approximately 6001, will limit major development on both sides of the
frontage road - a minimum depth of 330' would be required. Along east end,
adjacent to Lots A and B, some type of buffer should be provided along the
north side of the frontage road. This developer does not propose use of
multiple residential development as transition zoning. Future use of Lots
A and B as transition multiple residential was never really discussed by
Planning Commission. What are your concerns? comments? etc.? as a result
of this proposal . . .
2. Frontage Road - Temporary Curb Cuts. Future road off Willow Drive must
be a minimum of 300' from Highway 12 intersection and at least 150' south
of the Dickey Lake Drive intersection. Staff must discourage pedestrian
cross -over use of frontage road. Uses or improvements on north side of
road must not encourage customer cross -over. Temporary curb cut off
Highway 12 (minimum distance of 600' from intersection of Willow Drive)
must be approved by State Highway Department and must be closed off when
frontage road access to Highway is realized (alignment with Brimhall on
south side of Niqhway 12). The access road as shown in an ea-t/west
section on both schemes involves Lots A and B. Lots A and B will remain
zoned residential and were never part of the corridor considerations and
cannot be included within the roadway. Access road must be defined within
the future commercial zone. It is staff's understanding that the applicant
does not propose to divide the property at this time. Applicant may be
advised to take the opportunity as the first developer within this section
of the corridor to place roadway based on his future plans for development.
The frontage road would have to be at least developed to the end of the use
area at the first stage of development.
Zoning Pile #1241
January 13, 1988
Page 3 of 3
3. Future Dedicz '-ion for Utilities/Road Right -of -Way. An additional 7
feet of right-of-way will be asked along the east side of Willow Drive
providing additional area for snow storage and sidewalk. Additional access
will also be sought at the intersection of Highway 12 and Willow Drive for
a future proposed traffic light. TZere may be a possible need to seek
additional utility easements for a future pump house. <emember this is
the area discussed in the Comprehensive Plan as a municipal well site. The
site was selected by the engineer as an excellent location because it
provided access to the Jordan aquifer, anything further west would inhibit
use of the Jordan aquif,:r. This well site would only be developed if a
problem with Long Lake arose as to water supply and makes good future
planning sense. In addition, the frontage road would be a future public
road maintained by the City.
4. Fewer and Water. At this point in time, it would appear that sewer
would come from the Orono line to the west and water from the Long Lake
system also to the west. Water service appears to be no problem with Long
Lake. As for sewer, the property has never been assessed and would be
sewered through a new public improvement project. Sewer service must be
provided via a public improvement project as the City would not encourage
the individual developer to connect as a single user.
5. Formal Application. The City will not accept an application for the
rezoning of this property until performance standards have been approved
by the City. Such application would include a request for rezoning,
commercial site plan review designed per new performance standards,
possible subdivision designating new frontage road and possibly additional
commercial uses to the east of the landscape use. The City certainly would
be looking for additional dedication of utility and right-of-way easements
and designation of landscape buffer zones along the north.
Planning Commission members are encouraged to review their
Comprehensive Plan and define any other planning issues that members feel
should be addressed at this time. As for the applicant's request for
specific information on parking, absent performance standards we are unable
to give any definite direction. This would also be the same response we
would have regarding the proposed landscaping.
CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION
---------------------------------------------------------------
PROPERTY LOCATION
r Tr,
Site Address C�iyP.- e ''//'''Y /Z g" lti l� A ur OFFI i
�� 1I�.T- 2l �' �F FI;'�Nit�F OFFICE
Property Identification Number (P.I.D. ) i K's,12`11,100 If
Al rra�
V l UID A Lj V . l•'
Please check one - Property abstract or torrens?;.;yEr-K ?J I � i.AA�
(for Conditional Use Applications only) I.rrric I L.. vn
1 fl LIL A / 111A A YO
Please attach legal description to aprlication if not included
on required survey. :"13A'8 i
----------------------------------------------------------- ---------------
APPLICANT Phone (home)
Name / (7pS. 40%vIy_ /C�! -Tu-r Phone (work) //7,3
-----Address- L' u�--- WoL Rhl�- -City- L------------------------
OWNER S,6 (if different than applicant) Phone (home)
Name Phone
Address
City
Zip
Date Property Acquired (month/year)
I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FRES - CONDITIONAL USB PERMITS
$100.00 a) Residential accessory Use
$150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.)
$150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bluq
$250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use
$200.00 f) Land Alteration
Grading and
floodplain
Grading and f.
Grading, seawall
of lakeshore
PRD/PID - see fee schedule
OTHER APPLICATIONS
$150.00
$250.00
$150.00
$ 50.00
_ $250.00
$200.00
k" other -
ig - designated wetland or
ing - 101 cu. yd. or more
, retaining walls within 75'
Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees)
Vacation
Easement Vacation
Easement Vacation with Subdivision
Rezoning
Appeals
see fee schedule
,-- -7
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
Present Zoning District
Present Use of Property Residential
Other (specify)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
Describe request in detail: SCe
----------------------------------------------------- ----------------------
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
1. Completed Application Form.
2. Certified Property Owners List of owners withi • .50' (you can obtain
this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-60-s Government
Center 348-3271)
3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names
on the above list with no return address.
4. Certificate of survey.
5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land
alterations involve changes in elevation (grades).
6. Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements).
7. Plat Map.
8. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of
any other persons you wish notified of this application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please
remember that your application is not complete if the above information has
not been included.
------------- -------------------------------------------------------------
Certifa.cation by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete.
Zoning Officials Signature Date
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or
requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or
unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that
the information su;plied is true and correct to the best of his/her
knowle:lge .
Applicant's signature Date 12
OWNERS SIGNATURE
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further
authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants,
+gents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of
invet;tigation and verification of this request.
Owner's signature Date
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the
Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the
third Monday of each month. Applicants mist be present at all scheduled
review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is
unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an
authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building 6 Zoning
Office of this change prior to the meeting.
OTTE1\ �l`vv�• OFFICE. h GARDEN CENTER: 2265 W. WAY ZA;,I BLVD., LONG LAKE
1 MAILING ADDRESS. P.O BOX 268, LONG LAKE, MN 55356 • 473-5425
NURSERY &.
LANDSCAPING, INC.
DecembEr 31, 1987
Members of the Orono Planning Commission:
Enclosed are two conceptual commercial site plan schematics for
the property located at th.e Nortiteaa t corner of itighway 12 and Willow
Drive.
The intent of this sketch submittal in to solicit the Commission's
initial thoughts in regards to such a project.
Reactions desired but not limited to are: 'type of business,
building(s) and parking locations, access, proposed landscaping, and
computability with corridor recommendations. Feedback at this stage
of planning is critical for Otten Bros. to decide whether additional
Architectural planning is feasible at this time.
Otten Bros.' desire to expand is the increased neea for space to
continue operations. Our business operations include bg-.th a retail
Garden Center, Management and Design Headquarters, and Installation/
Construction division. The common denominator of all operations is
plant material, landscape supplies and equipnent storage space which
at present time is inadequate. Since relocating from Wayzata to Long
Lake, several years ago, community acceptance and response has exceeded
our projected spacial reeds. Con.,:idering the 11y4 project and the future
population growth in this area, we feel a propo,el of this nature will
better serve our commune`ies gn)wiug needs.
Since _
Robert Favor
Vice Preginent
RF:ng
Enclosures: 2
OVER 10 YEARS OF QUALITY SERVICE
RINGERSWOOD
NIMA /et ✓4 .'. dAJW87/isl dMs sWo if !eT 17 n rwwwsrn/a/
/ Ol h! u/ nl Af TMOb GA6 /Wrff 11 !1 ad Ww 0 At f ,w/ •f* 4W mw Ab"i'
rr.t2.1f Avmf (As myj
- 162"70r SAWX iWfiE
r - - 'b00 09 1 r - - _ _ _
1�1 r - n -
I1 7il.l.i -- / Wo.00
DICKEYS �*
's
LAKE �
•T 4 lam+
Wh—
1 4 « r �--4--;�i[. \ \j)k• / I SaMi►1.�Mrf�•wWi1��p�511-j�}��`C•��1��
�h v %L SW w fr.L.I p tiwMS 6~iul
l-i►.A- - -•-�-- i 1A �1i1� •i rr wry .l wM ,
lYM�4 d� M�N11� � I•t(•���' \ - - �i � �- --- I . � i:L7r Mwf �!7•f! .a
s ', ��wi► Ile s ~' (p�jfin+w "(rt� ) / } f f M 61 rww114:
��'fw/A NOt.i wiWr►d ik6+Lt7
` $ 4
� ��% �� 2
� ' t;2 8j �/� • � rz �� '1
141
-
- Mrrns�•�r - _ 1
u�i - ° �i , �' \d r,(�1�•-,- -ram» i'` f
2 a r
Er j/. ' •
i
s
I °s,,�
OUTLOT A
1 w1 fIM t tirM I i
,..LL F.. • •4. uw r..F�e Nw v�.. l► / MnAn n .1
{t I y � •wy GLe its
U 5 HIGHWAYmum NO Q ltf.�t
It/p ll r �LX D'E two be me Oft mw*.f r+. *w * •f W- WM
r 410 Wr inns. C." Vol � � �
N 112 SEC. 34, T. //8. R. 23
tsl t t t IN
— Ap r
9I w4 rf
G CITY Or ono• o
r
1{1
S y Q
IA-
1C
W •. . NN
JJtr
1 � fR°��W � ytw►�'��
1 Y aONN •. � t �1r.R� •a.. � — — — _ _ _ __� �._ •N••a I ♦Mt lW
11� lil Ll 1 �: > • C� 5 u ttt.
V
arts AM+la ' `iil ` ; �. y�I.t as
Q) �.
r .Lr ar .—ar.� H W 1 -� - i
aser nr� Y C wl t a..a �.
it II p . —lr Cl V . - / �l __ n •�V ) ) .l oar
kA
h
Woo
J
a+• r J a
rI�N,ElS w SiREET ]4 ::h�l ..� sr 'K•• Y t •f ••
y,��
1 ' ••fir �• I; f `-t f
I
� rrrr-
�oM
BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD \
y � 6 �.a.
._ . O ti. 1 "'"' ....� ,... �« ..�. s ter►. ✓ _
v r row • , t•a ra :... • a ar
0-11
4.3 Principel Goals
Compatible Uses and Transitions - A significant concern is
to develop land uses that provide appropriate transitions between
the traffic and noise associated with Highway 12 and quality
single family neighborhoods beyond. More intensive . :nmercial
uses were judged to be appropriate adjacent to the highway, but
these uses should not extend so far back from the highway
corridor as to adversely effect any established neighborhoods.
Any development should be limited by the location of existing
natural features and the capacities within the available utility
systems.
Land Use Mix and Balance - Given any alteration, the
objectives established in this area include providing for a wide
range of complimentary land uses. Every effort should be made to
balance peak demands for transportation and utilities, while
providing a range of community services and retail and
convenience stores for local residents.
Perfornance Standards - This goal is the development of
implementation toulb using thr rprformance approach to allow for
the flexibility to provide preservation of natural environment
features, compatibility with surrounding development and require-
ment that a number of selected issues be addressed before the
development can take place. These standards would be used both
within and outside any extended Municipal Urban Service Area.
7
19
4
-- cw�a rwn. --
cn,a0.»
Maple Rain -Long Lake k teroeptor
- — - Medina-arono-Long Lake Interceptor
Water Main
-- New Roads
Current MUSA
••••• Proposed Extension of MUSA
r
city Of Orono
MIGHW A Y 12 CORRIDOR S; Lio r
Western Portion
CURRENT AND PROPOSED METROPOLITAN
URBAN SERVICE AREA LIMITS
Fig Ba
Property Area No. 5 -
Description - This small parcel of 13 acres represents the.
property most difficult to develop effectively because of its
narrow depth between Highway 12 and the existing Ringerswood
residential area. The area however, does not have soil
limitations, wetland limitations, or slope concerns found in
other areas (see Appendix E). The shape and size of this parcel
does present a problem for the installation of a frontage road in
this area.
area.
Discussion of Alternatives -
Alternatives as indicated above are very limited for this
1. Developed According Current Zoning - This parcel is
relatively small and presents constraints regarding
development as found in other area in the corridor.
2. Commercial./Retail/Multiple Families - Alternative
development in the northeast quadrant of Willow Drive and
Highway 12 would be of a commercial office/retail nature. It
is anticipated that any development on the north/east side
of the frontage road .could be of a multi -residential nature.
The possible inclusion of two residential lots (A 6 d) which
` were not originally included in the study would allow for
1
approrriate buffering between the multi -residential and the
single family development in Ringers Wood.
' S�
LAKF_ -RD, -. , V
SMS Primary Frontage Road
e ee a Alternate Frontage Road
Area 5
Recommended Alternative - Fig.33
The recommended alternative in Figure 33 would include
transition of commercial on the south side of the frontage road
back to multi -residential on the north, with appropriate
buffering from the single family to the north. The frontage
road, regardless of configuration, would commence opposite the
frontage road west of Willow Drive and tie into the frontage road
coming from North Brown Road. Given the intensity of
development, this area would be sewered either through the Long
along Willow Drive, or possibly through branches of the Long Lake
System.
Y
lion
MMV��Y
0
Y' SCHEME D .�
.. r' - .Trp G7YRI C+I••�B;Nfi0 c+�P'fl/C�:�iL./C67MGB• N1TN i,'�rt��tp�
row e
1.
.. I .. _ �' 'iMaYVWGN/I' �rKRa"cR- fy GgY.GL 1
. Tv r..•L_ V cP.aGG,G
Ifik Is OL
+ • W M iG 10 io r '
Hill
��}�MMrMiA Mm�avrva T.
WALUN
114166
1688.4
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 2348
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING SELECTED APPOINTMENTS
FOR THE YEAR 1988
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, that
the appointments and designations for the year 1988 are as follows:
APPOINTMENT/DESIGNATION
Acting Mayor
Planning Commission Councilmember
Park Commission Chairman
Representative to Lake Minnetonka
Conservation District
Representative to Association of
Metropolitan Municipalities
Legislative Liaison AMM
Lead Attorney
City Attorney Firm
Alternate Attorney
Lead Engineer
City Engineering Firm
Health Officer
Auditor
Fiscal Agents
Insurance Agent of Record
Official Newspaper
Official Depositories/
Investment Vendors
1988
Edward Callahan
Alternate
Robert Kost
JoEllen Hurr
Mark Bernhardson
Mark Bernhardson
Kathleen Blatz (to 1/15/88)
Tom Barrett (after 1/15/88)
Popham, iiaik, Schnobrich,
Kaufman and Doty
William Soth, Dorsey & Whitney
Glenn Cook
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and
Associates
Mound Medical Clinic
Pannel, Kerr, Forster
Ehlers & Associates
Duweyn P. Carlson
Apple Valley Insurance
The Laker and Pioneer
First National Banks of:
The Lakes (Navarre)
Wayzata
Minneapolis
St. Paul
Wayzata Bank & Trust Company
Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner
and Smith, Inc.
Marquette Bank, Minneapolis
American National Bank & Trust
Company of St. Paul
First Minnesota FSB, Mound
League of MN Cities - 4M Fund
National City Bank of Minneapolis
Norwest Bank Minneapolis
Twin City Federal Savings & Loan
Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, Mpls.
Dain Bosworth, Inc., Mpls.
United Savings Assn., Houston, TX
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 2348
&PPOINTMENT/DESIGNATION
Official Depositories/ Continued.
Investment Vendors
Weed Inspector
Assistant Weed Inspector
Transportation Committee
Emergency Preparedness Director
Southwest Sanitary Sewer District
Suburban Health Nursing Service
Cable TV Committee (2 plus Alternate)
West Hennepin Recycling Commission
Mayor's Association
Suburban Rate Authority
West Tonka Senior Citizens
Minnesota Police Recruiting System
1988
Greenwood Trust Co., Delaware
First Mutual Savings Bank, Bellevue,
Washington
North Fork Bank & Trust Co, New York
Nat'l Bank of Washington, D.C.
Goldome Savings Bank, Buffalo, N.Y.
Dime Savings Bank, Garden City,
Long Island, N.Y.
Home Federal Savings & Loan,
San Diego, California
Society Savings, Hartford, Conn.
Exchange National Bank, Chicago, Ill
Commerce Bank, Virginia Beach, VA
M. H. Novick & Co. Inc., Mpls., MN &
Orlando, Florida
Bear, Stearns & Co, New York, N.Y.
James Grabek
John Gerhardson
John Gerhardson
Melvin Kilbo
Mark Bernhardson
Mark Bernhardson
Barbara Peterson
Tim Adams
J. Diann Goetten (Alternate)
John Gerhardson
James Grabek
Jol^n Gerhardson
Mark Bernhardson (Alternate)
James Grabek
Melvin Kilbo
Mark Bernhardson (Alternate)
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minr.esoti, at a regular
meeting held January 11, 1988.
ATTEST:
Jame R. ,rah Mayor
otfiy- bU n-,—pity Cler ___--
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 27, 1988
ATTENDANCE 7:02 P.M.
The Orono Planning Commission met on the abov.. date with
the following members present: Chairman Kelley,
Johnson, Taylor, Brown, and Cohen. Bellows arrived at
7:05 P.M. Hanson was absent. The following represented
the City staff: Building & Zoning Administrator
Mabusth, Building Official Jacobs, and City Recorder
Peterson. Councilmembers Callahan, Peterson, and
Goetten were also present.
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - ACCESSORY BUILDINGS
PUBLIC HEARING 7:03-7:04
The affidavit of publication was noted.
GEO TEXTILE FABRIC
DISCUSSION
Staff recommended continuinG the Public hearing until
the February 16, 1988 Planning Commission meeting.
There were no comments from the public regarding this
matter.
It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Cohen, to table the
public hearing for the proposed accessory building
ordinance amendment until the February 16, 1988 meeting.
Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. (Bellows was not present for
this vote)
City Engineer Cook was unable to attend this meeting,
therefore, it was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by
Johnson, to table this discussion until the February 16,
1988 meeting. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. (Bellows was not
present for this vote)
11232 BETZ BUILDERS
60/100 STUBBS BAY ROAD
CLASS III SUBDIVISION
PRELIMINARY PLAT
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:05•-7.06
Thomas Betz was nr?sent for this matter.
Mabus-h expla_ned the revised plans confirming the dry
buildable area exclusive of roadway plus extension and
area of pond. In additiona, she reviewed the storm sewer
detail, and amended road plans.
There were no comments from the public regarding this
matter and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Johnson, to
recommend approval per staff recommendation. Motion,
Ayes 6, Nays 0.
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 27, 1988
#1234 JOHN & LYNN DOUGAN
2785 WHITE OAR CIRCLE
RENEWAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PUBLIC HEARING 7:07-7:21
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
were noted.
John & Lynn Dougan were present for this matter.
Mabtisth explained the request for renewal of a
conditional use permit approved in 1986 to excavate a
retention pond for flood control purposes.
C�le� questioned the purpose of executing a hold
t'-2-�'a?ess agreement.
14o.-,usth explained that the purpose of the hold harmless
agreement is to protect any rights the City has to the
underlying easements area of the roadway because the
excavated pond will be partially within the unused
portion of the road right-of-way.
Cohen felt that in conjunction with requiring a
permanent hold harmless agreement, proof of liability
insurance also be required.
Mr. Dougan stated that he did not intend to excavate
anywhere near the road and that the culvert would not be
changed or altered. He also explained the history of
the drainage problems which did not occur last year. He
would prefer not to have the drainage pond, however, is
keeping his option open based on the upcoming spring
conditions.
Johnson felt this was a public or neighborhoou
improvement.
Mabusth explained that if this was the case, the
Dougan's and other affected property owners would
have to petition for a public improvement.
It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Bellows, to
recommend approval per staff recommendation and subject
to executing a permanent hold harmless agreement
including proof of liability insurance. Motion, Ayes 6,
Nays 0.
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 27, 1983
#1237 DAVID H. PRICE
2914 CASCO POINT ROAD
AFTER -THE -FACT VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING 7:27-7:29
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
w-rn noted.
Mrs. David Price was present and requested their
application be tabled because Mr. ,Price was unable to
attend this meeting due to illness.
There were no comments from the public at this time.
Mabusth noted that the navigable depth of Casco Cove
charnel has yet to be determined.
Planning ''ommission recommended waiting until the ice
goes out.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley► seconded by Johnson, to
table this matter (approximately May 1988) until staff
has resolved the navigational issue. Motion, Ayes 6,
Nays 0.
#1238 WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB
200 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING 7:28-7:32
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
were noted.
James Lindblad was present representing the Wayzata
Country Club.
Bill Ferrill, 240 Wakefield Road, neighbor and member of
Wayzata Country Club and also Chairman of the Grounds
Committee for this project, was also present for this
matter. He noted that the only affected neighbor is
Paul Baszucki, 250 Wakefield Road, and the Club has
repositioned the building per Mr. Baszucki's request and
have also agreed to paint the building a color of their
choice. He noted that a berm will also screen the
building from the neighboring property.
Chairman Kelley asked if there was an automatic
moratorium on accessory structures because of the
pending ordinance amendment?
Mabusth stated there was no formal moratorium, it would
have required a separate ordinance.
There were no comments from the public regarding this
mat,.er and the public hearing was closed.
3
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 27, 1988
#1238 WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB CONTINUED
Mabusth recommended a grading plan be submitted for the
berm.
Mr. Ferrill clarified that the Country Club curre :tly
has a berm which they plan to extend with any extra fil l
they have; and that the Buszuki's plan to excavate a
pond and create a berm.
Planning Commission directed staff to inspect the berm
to verify that it meets City standards prior to final
approval.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seco.ided by Cohen, to
recommend approval of the conditional use permit and
variance per staff recommendation based on the finding
that the property consists of 144 continuous acres of
land, subject to the existing/proposed berm meeting City
standards prior final approval. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 1.
Brown voted nay feeling that the berm issue should not
be included with approval of the accessory structure.
#1239 BYRNE WILLIAMS
4127 OAR STREET
RENEWAL VARIANCES
PUBLIC HEARING 7:45-7:55
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
were noted.
Applicant, Byrne Williams, was unable to attend the
meeting but submitted a letter requesting that the
Planning Commission act on her application in her
absence.
Mabusth explained the request for renewal of lot area
and lot width variances originally approved by the City
in 1969 and 1979. She noted that the applicant has
since acquired another parcel of property but it cannot
be credited to the lot area because it is divided by a
putted right-of-way. The proposed lot area is
consistent with previously approved lot area variances
in the immediate neighborhood. She noted that access
to this property would bring the total tc four
residences served by the unimproved roadway now
maintained by the residents. In order for the City to
upgrade and maintain this section of road, all four
affected property owners would have to petition the City
for the public improvement.
Charles & Ann Hommeyer, 4125 Oak Street, were present
and stated that upgrading the road would be of major
concern to the affected property owners.
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 27, 1988
#1239 WILLIAMS CONTINUED
Cohen agreed with the Hommeyers and felt that the
applicz.tior, should be tabled to give the other property
owners the opportunity to comment on this critical
issue.
Bellows stated she did not like granting lot area and
lot width variances without a building envelope.
Mabusth suggested that Public Works DJ -actor Gerhardson
also attend the meeting to discuss the :oad improvement
issue.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley► seconded by Johnson, to
table this matter so that the affected property owners
are advised about the road improvement issue and given
the opportunity to comment. Motion► Ayes 6, Nays 0.
#1240 NAVARRE DAIRY QUEEN
3574 SHORELINE DRIVE
COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW
L VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING 7:56-8:09
The Affidavit
were noted.
of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
Owner/Applicant, Rick Plaisted, was present for this
matter.
Jacobs explained that the original proposal included a
71x10' solarium addition to the south side, but has
since been omitted because of the inability to conform
with the restroom requirements. The proposal now
consists of only a drive-through/pick up station on the
west side.
Bellows felt it was inappropriate to review and make a
recommendation on this application without a landscaping
plan.
Jacobs noted that there have been several changes in the
plan and he has been in contact with the contractor by
prone from South Dakota, which has made it difficult to
so,•.,e some of the issues.
Cohen and Bellows felt that the application should be
tabled for staff to review the application without the
solarium addition (parking requirements, etc.) and
pending a landscape plan.
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 27, 1988
#1240 NAVARRE DAIRY QUEEN CONTINUED
Rick Plaisted clarified his current proposal to:
1) Move the garage back to provide more parking and
the access for the drive-thru.
2) Move one call 4 feet.
3) Cosmetic changes to existing building.
Jacobs noted that 47 parking spaces would be required
based on the revised proposal without the solarium.
Planning Commission elt that the nature of the bus:.ness
with a drive-thru, a variance for the required parking
spaces would be appropriate.
There were no comments from the public regarding this
matter and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Taylor, to table this
application pending a site and landscape plan, directing
staff to advise applicant what will be needed. Motion,
Ayes 6, Nays 0.
#1241 UTTEN BROTHERS
WILLOW DRIVE/WAYZATA BOULEVARD
SKETCH PLAN REVIEW
Rob LaFavor, Vice President of Otten Bros., was present
for this matter.
Chairman Kelley explained the proposal to relocate the
nursery and landscape operation to the north side o..
Wayzata Blvd. at Willow Drive.
Mabusth noted that the issue of tempore .cess onto
Wayzata Blvd. would have to be reviewed i -e City and
State. She explained the City's desire t, a future
connection to Brimha l 1 and the future deve' opmernt of
the property.
Planning Commission felt that access should only be off
cf Willow Drive at this point in time at a or,e user
level.
Johnson and Kelley stated they preferred Scheme D
because it buffered the residential area better.
Mabusth noted that the Comprehensive Plan amendment and
performance standards for the corridor must be completed
before specific directives can be provided to the
applicant.
Planning Commission conceptually favored the project
finding this use compatible with adjacent residential
neighborhood.
I
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 27, 1.988
ESTABLISHMENT OF POLICY FOR DEADLINE DATE
FOR LAND USE APPLICATION AND ADDENDUM SUBMITTALS
FOR PLANNING COMMISSION AND COUNCIL
Bellows, Kelley, and Cohen felt that the proposed
deadline date should be moved back further for the
following reasons:
1) To provide ample time for staff review to
eliminate incomplete applications submitted to
Planning Commission.
2) To provide Planning Commission with an earlier
agenda packet to allow them to review in a timely
manner which would shorten the length of the
meetings.
Mabusth explained the deadline date of 25 days before
the meeting which is required due to the publication
deadline date, however, because of the bi-weekly Council
meetings and general work load, increasing the deadline
date may not result in earlier delivery of Planning
^ommission packets. She noted that many problems are
due to the applicant's lack of understanding.
It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Brown, to approve the
policy establishing a dea :line for the filing of alnd
use applications and foc addendum submittals when
applications are tabeled during the review process, as
submitted. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 1. Bellows voted nay
feeling the deadline date should be increased by another
week to give staff further time to review before the
publication deadline date.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Johnson, t�
approve the Minutes of the December 21, 1987 Plannin,
Commission meeting as submitted. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays
0.
PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE
Cohen was appointed to attend the February 8, 1988
Council meeting.
ADJOURNMENT 8:51 P.M.
The Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 8:51 P.M.
LLOYO BENTSEN. TEXAS. CHAIRMAN
SPARK M MATIUNAGA. HAWAR
600 PACKWOOD. OREGGN
DANIEL ►ATRICK MOYNIHAN, NEW YORK
KOE DOLE. KANSAS
MAX SAUCUS MONTANA
WILLIAM V ROTH. JR. DELAWARE
DAVID L BOREN OKLAHOMA
JOHN C DANFORTH. MISSOUIi
BILL BRADLEY, NEW JERSEY
JOHN H CNAFEE. RHODE ISLAND
GEORGE J MITCHELL, MAINE
JOHN HEINZ ►ENNSYLVANIA
DAVID PRYOR. ARKANSAS
MALCOLM WALLOP, WYOMING
DONALD W MEGLI. JR, MICHIGAN
DAVID DURENBERGER. MH/NE57TA
JOHN D ROCKEFELLER EV. WEST VIAGINIA
WILLIAM I_ ARMSTRONG. COLORADO
TOM DASCHLE. SOUTH DAKOTA
IARUUAM J WILKINS, STAFF DIRECTOF' AND CHIEF COUNSEL
MARY MCAULIFFE- MINORITY CHIEF OF STAFF
Dorothy Hallin
City of Orono
PO Box 66
Orono, MN 55323
Dear Dorothy,
United states senate
COMMITTEE ON FINANCE
WASHINGTON, DC 20510-6200
February 1, 1988
a M L
I�
FEB - 3 I
�I
I
Sorry about the delay in sending this confirmation
to you.
We would appreciate the use of the Orono Council
Chamber for a Senator Durenberger Staff Reachout
to be scheduled for Wednesday, February 24 from
10:00 - 12:00 noon.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. I am
looking forward to seeing you then.
Sincerely,
I
Jud Swan olm
MN irect r Outreach
U 'ted States Senator
]s
Durenberger
GERR`f SIKORSKI;;,
61N D15111IC1, MINNIS(/1. S ti!.•'�h .
WHIP AT LARGE ( i
ENERGY AND COMMERCE
POST OFFICE AND CIVIL SERVICE
CHAIRMAN. HUMAN RESOURCES Congrva of tbt Mniteb *tateg
SELECT COMMITTEE ON
CHILDREN, YOUTH, AND FAMILIES Joottge of Repreantatibeg
Na bington, IDd 20515
January 22, 1988
Ms. Dorothy Hallin
Orono City Hall
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Dear Dorothy:
WASHINGTON OFFICE
414 CANNON HOUSE OFFICE BLDG
WASHINGTON. DC 20515
12021 225-2211
DENNIS M[GRANN
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
DISTRICT OFFICE
8060 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE
FRIDLEY. MN 55432-1862
(61 21 180-5801
DAVID BARTHOLOMAY
DISTRICT DIRECTOR
II� 1-9Qq�%0
JAN 2 5 r4p�
I am writing to request use of the Orono Council Chambers
for Congressman Sikorski's Community Service Program. We would
like to use the chambers on Wednesday, February 10 from 1-2
p.m. The purpose of the meeting is to give the residents of
Orono and the surrounding area an opportunity to meet with
Congressman Sikorski's staff about issues which concern them.
A mailing will be sent to the residents of Orono informing
them of the meeting. In addition, a press release will bp sent
to area newspapers for circulation.
If I can answer any questions, please don't hesitate to
contact me at 780-5801. Thank you for your cooperation in this
matter, and I look forward to hearing from you.
incereIy,
Bob Hicke)
Sikorski Aide
GES r bh
�% JAN 2 5 I�£8
HENNEPIN
PARKS
Suburban Hennepin
Replonal Park 01*W
12615 COanry Rood
PO BOa41320
PVnouth. MN 55"ll
Telephone le t 2) M".9000
January 26, 1988
u
JAN2ts10
Mr. Mark Bernardson, City Administrator
Word of Comm"Wwre
City of Orono
°oMd `a"aaha
Chou
P.O. Box 66
Golden Valley
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
W*Wy A /pnlne
Vice C no.
Mopb Flom
Dear Mr. Bernardson:
Myth S Ar4Wwn
BI°omlgtan
pan
'o0iOklynC nlet
Broolnyn Center
Thank you for sending the Park District a copy of the City of
"i`haaa`rown Robb,nWate
Orono' s 1988 Legislative Policies. We have noted comments on
Mona ". W I
Golden Valle,
page 5 pertaining to Hennepin Parks.
"eM Webet
Mound
Vets, "anenowq
As the Park District Board's 1988 Chair, I will continue to
Superintendent &
0 0'a to B
Board
encourage intergovernmental cooperation as Hennepin Parks moves
forward to implement its capital improvement program and expand
opportunities for outdoor education and recreation.
We look forward to working with the City of Orono in the
future. Please continue to keep us informed.
Sincerely,
Shirley A. Bonine, Chair
SAB:ghd
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
Board of Managers I `
AN 2 1988
FROM:
Eugene A. Hickok and Associates
DATE:
January 17, 1988--
RE:
Lake Level, Flow and Precipitation
Summary for December
1987
Lake levels in Lake Minnetonka have stabilized at approximately 928 in December
as illustrated by the attached graph and lake elevations. There has not been
any discharge from Lake Minnetonka to Minnehaha Creek since November 17, 1986.
Creek flow at the Browndale Avenue Dam in Edina is not measured during the
winter months.
The 30-year average precipitation for December at the National Weather Service
station in Maple Plain is 0.86 inches. The actual precipitation recorded in
Wayzata for December was 0.79 inches. A summary of precipitation follows.
PRECIPITATION SUMMARY
Actual 30-Year Average
Maple Plain December * 0.86
Minneapolis -St. Paul December 1.25 0.87
International Airport
Wayzata December 0.79
*Unavailable at the time of this report.
��11111 IK.11\.1I I'%A %/1 Cats. V1 u 1 1 .>1 i%+u IJ IJ I 1 I%_ 1
Lake Altko Water ElevoUons - 1986-1988
930.00
929.80
929.60
929.40
929.20
929.00
928.80
928.60
928.40
928.20
928.00
927.80
927.60
927.40
927.20
927.00
NOHW(929.4)
RUNOUT ELEVATION;928.6)
LAKE ELEVATION
07-Jul-88 23-Jon-87 11-Aug -87 27-Feb-88
Dote
2=2=--Z%Tdis- - »-•�-•�«asr �s�22 x:ram--= �.x.S_Z��x=�i��-��_:��� -== -----�-_= ^�����
MCND Water Elevations - Lake Minnetonka
cx=-suss:s--rst-��=aYss_z�asa�sxsxz-srs:�-sas-_--__x_sxn_.__--�-_•�-_-_----axr`u-_x:-�= zx::___sc-=_:xs=
Date Elevation Flow Date Elevation Flow Date Elevation Flow Date Elevation Flow
1 24-Nov-86
928.44
0
15-Jun-87
927.69
0
26-Aug-87
928.65
0 * 05-Jan-89 927.95 0
08-Dec-86
929.42
0,
23-Jun-87
927.67
0
31-Aug-87
Irl.65
0 -19-Jan-88 927.88 0
16-Dec-86
928.40
0
01-Jul-87
927.55
0
01-Se9-87
928.64
0
09-Jan-87
M.38
0
06-Jul-87
927.48
0
09-Sep-87
M.52
0
21-Jan-87
929.37
0
14-Jul-87
927.43
0
14-Sep-81
928.48
0
30-Jan-87
929.38
0
16-Jul-97
927.37
0
18-Sep-87
M.53
0
05-reb-87
929.40
0
21-Jul-87
927.71
0
21-Sep-07
928.47
0
18-Feb-87
929.35
0
22-Jul-87
727.71
0
25-Sep-87
929.44
0
26-Feb-87
929.34
0
24-Jul-97
M.62
0
28-Sep-87
M.42
0
06-Mar-87
928.35
0
27-Jul-87
928.75
0
05-Oct-87
929.32
0
13-Mar-87
929.34
0
28-Jul-87
928.73
0
12-Oct-97
528.13
0
26-Mar-87
929.37
0
30-Jul-87
928.79
0
16-0ct-87
929.16
0
06-Ayr-87
928.28
0
31-Jul-87
978.81
0
20-Oct-87
928.15
0
13-Apr-87
928.25
0
03-Aug-87
929.91
0
26-Oct-87
929.12
0
21-Apr-87
928.20
0
06-Ooig-87
978.78
0
0241ov-81
929.06
0
27-Apr-97
929.22
0
10-Aug-87
928.79
0
09-Wov-87
928.04
0
04-May-87
M.72
0
11--kuq-87
929.77
0
16-Nov-81
929.04
0
12-May-87
929.23
0
17-Aug-97
929.05
0
24-tiov-97
929
0
21-May-BY
927,94
0
18-kg-97
928.93
0
01-Dec-87
928.1
0
28-May-87
927.93
0'
19-&10:17
928.79
0
07-Dec-87
929.09
0
03-Jun-87
927.99
0
24-Aug-87
928.72
0
14-Dec-87
929.08
0
* NOTE: The
zero
elevation
for the
Lake gauge was
adjusted down 0.22 feet,
this
adjustment was effective
Jan. 1. 1988
To: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator
From: Jeanne A. 14abusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator
Date: January 27, 1988
Subject: Report on Activities and Revenues - Building L Zoning Department - 1985-1987
ACTIVITIES
Building Permits
1987
1986
1985
Mc. of
No. of
No. of
Fesidential
Permits
valuation
Permits
Valuation
Permits
Valuation
New Single
68
$13,098,100
46
$9.150,673
54
$11,766,000
Add/Remodel
220
5,435,275
226
4,419,227
171
3,219,092
Accesscry Bldgs
55
1,291,470
71
495,575
69
597,266
Demos
25
36.570
16
12,950
15
16,200
Now Nor 1 193,000 0 0 5 176,595
Add/Rerac::el 18 2,230,750 11 80,050 3 67,000
Accessory Bldgs 9 131,950 0 - 0 -
Demos 1 15,000 0 - 0
Institutional
Add/Remodel 4 37,900 2 298,626 1 85,600
Accessory aldgs 2 6,000 0 - 0 -
TOTAL 403 $22,478,015 372 $14,457,091 318 $15.928,553
General Permits 614
me
463
REVTAMS
1987 1986 1985
Bldg Permits $134,792 $126.326 $87,976
(Plan Review)
General Permits $37,518 $29,674 $22,688
Inspections 1 Inspections 1 Inspections
Septic Permit 306 592 129 Annual Septic $20,860 $20.000 $21.420
Tee Payments
Land Use
Applications 137
98
116 $30,343
$17,873
$20,490
TOTAL RECEMUE $223,513
$193,953
$152,574
COLLECTED CITY OF OROHD
Contract Cities - 1987
4 of 4 of
Pa■ collected*
Plan Reviews Inspections
Retainer, plan review, inspections, adds hours
Spring Park
22
1"
Spring Park 10.817
6,349
8.603
Mtka Beach
19
169
Mtka Beach 5,331
4,613
3,134
Wayzata
22
65
Wayzata 818%
9,514
5,243
TOTAL
63
400
TOTAL REYEMOE $25,044
$20,476
$16.980
COLLECTED PROM COMTRACT CITIES
TOTAL RZY MOE i2". 557
$214,429
$169,554
COL�.ECTED By CITT
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE SCHOOL BC
OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.
HELD ON JANUARY 11, 1988
The regular meeting of the School Board of Orono Independent School District No.
278 was held on Monday, January 11, 1988.
Present: Dave McKown James Franklin Thomas Mich
Kitty Crosby John Maresh William Fenholt
Absent: Don Anderson
Lucie Taylor
UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Jim Franklin, the consent agenda was
approved as follows:
- appro:Fd the minutes of the December 14, 1987 regular meeting;
- approved the appointment of Heidi L. Rosenwinkel as emotional behavioral
disabili`ies teacher at the intermediate/middle school;
- approved a disability/maternity leave for Joyce A. Lenz, Schumann
Elementary teacher, effective March 2, 1988 for the remainder of the
1987-88 school year;
- apprc -ed the appointment of Camella O'Brien as middle school health clerk
effective January 4, 1988;
- approved the 1988-89 high school course of studies as presented in the
course registrat;on handbook;
- approved the bills as covered by vouchers 057690 through 057737 and 056856
through 057046.
Dr. Mich reported that, as a reminder, the Minnesota School Boards Association
banquet will be held on January 18 at the Hyatt Regency and that the AMSO
legislative dinner will be held on January 20 at the St. Paul Hotel; that the
new ceiling and lighting on the second floor of the middle school has been
completed; that he was distributing to them a cost of living study done by the
Hopkins School District dealing with equity funding which demonstrates the need
for additional funds for the metropolitan area as opposed to out -state and,
through the AMSD legislative meetings, the legislature will be encouraged to
conduct a similar study which would provide the background/proof for the
legislature to differentiate funding between the metropolitan area and out -state
area; that he had received a letter of congratulations on behalf of Toni
Bergland from the National Community Education Association for her good work on
the Conference Planning Committee; that on January 12 the o,-ientation for
incoming 9th graders will be held at the high school.
Kitty Crosby expressed appreciation to Karen Orcutt for providing the follow-up
on the learning styles report given at the last Board meeting.
Mrs. Crosby stated that she was impressed with the Hanus Bus Company inspection
report and that they should be commended for this excellent report.
UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Jim Franklin, a letter of congratula-
tions will be sent to Hanus Bus Company.
Dr. Mich stated that on January 29 the school district will honor those staff
members with twenty-five or more years of service to the district. This will
take place at the annual mid -year luncheon held at the high school.
UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Jim Franklin, the Board of Education
will alter the existing 1987-88 Orono School calendar so that the afternoon of
January 28 will become a teacher workshop session for the teachers at Schumann
Elementary School rather than a full school attendance day for elementary stu-
dents.
Marvel Bongart provided the Board with background information regarding the
development of the policy proposal relating to AIDS. She stated that the com-
mittee studied curriculum used in area schools, state department guidelines,
etc. and, from this information/study, a policy was developed which would be
workable for our school district.
Dr. Mich stated that, when the Board looks at this for adoption, the policy por-
tion will be separated from the curriculum portion.
Members of the committee were present and answered questions from the Board mem-
bers. Appreciation was expressed to the committee for their time and effort in
the development of this policy. Committee members were: JoAnn Ree, school
nurse; Lynda Meador, social worker; Sally Erickson and Dar Whitman, Schumann
Elementary representatives; Herb Carruthers, intermediate school representative;
Jan Jacobson, Connie Priesz, Lee Vickers, middle school representatives; Mike
Blanski and Ellayne Kortuem, high school representatives.
Bill Fenholt provided the Board with information regarding the underground oil
storage tank evaluation as required under a new state law requiring evaluation
of our fuel storage tank sites for soil contamination. Mr. Fenholt stated that
the district is proceeding according to the requirements and that the reme-
diation of problem areas will begin this summer. Financial assistance through
government agencies should be available providing all procedures are followed
and satisfy the Environmental Protection Agency. Administration will provide
further information as the process develops.
UPON MOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by John Maresh, the meeting was adjourned.
Ka he ine P. Crosby, -Clerk
Approved:
Dave McKown, Chairman
Administrative Notes
Self-concept in among those elLsivP concepts that
evade definition. Yet there is little misunderstand-
ing when someone describes another individual or a
student an having a good self-concept.
It seems that ue recognize a strong or injured self-
concept, but we are Bard pressed to name the ingredt-
ants or components of self-concept. That, of course,
Is not too surp-ising. Most of us have enjoyed a
particular meal and declared it superb without really
understanding 0e composition of the ingredients or
Its special preparation.
There is no doubt that a healthy self-concept is
essential to a productive, rewarding, and happy life.
Challenges are diminished in the face of a strong
self-concept and the cry is "I can do that." However,
those challenges are magnified when set against a
weak self-concept and the cry is "1 can't do that."
An individual with a strong self-concept uses all of
his resources while frequently the person with a
weak self-concept is firmly focused on self-doubt and
unfavorable comparisons to others. A wise teacher
from my own high school days was fond of declaring to
his students that it's the I will that counts, not
the I.Q. His message was readily understood by high
school freshmen. Believe in yourself and make the
effort.
That same encouraging message is needed by students
today. Research has helped us to understand the
major compunents of student self-concept. We are
told that self-concept stands on two legs. One is
feeling of self-worth, the other is school achieve-
ment. As we demonstrate and beam our concern and
respect for students while helping them to achieve,
we assist in building self-concept.
The formula self-worth + school achievement - self-
concept belongs to all of us. Teachers ar,d parents
can work together ■o that the ingredientF of a healthy
and strong self-concept are found at school and at
home.
continued next column
ORONO SCHOOL BOARD
David McKown, Chairman
479-1692
Don Anderson, Vice Chairman
479-1810
Lucie Taylor, Treasurer
473-1189
Kitty Crosby, Clerk
478-6037
Jim Franklin, Director
479-2130
John Maresh, Director
475-3197
I am absolutely convinced that the results of such a
combined effort would be dramatic. In fact, it would
be revolutionary and the students would be the bene-
ficiaries.
For our part, the School District has pledged itself
to work toward positive self-concept for all students.
Our number one goal, developed and approved by the
Board of Education, is "Develop good character, self-
respect, a feeling of self-worth, and self-discipline."
Dr. Thomas B. Mica
Superintendent
.Ze fl t_Q TS PJLL
ARTIST -IN -RESIDENCE pF'-ER LAIORI
An exciting time was had by all Grades 1 - 4 students
in art classes when Peter Lupori, sculptor and teacher
at the College of St. Catherine spent a week with us.
Each s cadent did a clay project under the gulaance of
Mr. Lupori and Mrs. Shoop, our art teacher.
We ari honcted to have Mr. Lupori do an art residency
with us each year. We are the only school district
he works with in a residencv. Funding for this is
through your donations to the Orono Education Fund.
Karvel Bongart,
Principal, Schumann
Flementaty School
U OF M BANDS AT ORONO
A treat is in store for our community. On Tuesday,
February 2, at 7:30 p.m., the University of Minnesota
Wind Ensemble and Symphonic Bands will perform a con-
cert, free of charge, in the high school auditorium.
Directing the groups will be Dr. Barry Kopetz, director
of bands at the University. The public is invited to
attend this exciting event.
t
CONFERENCE SELECT BAND AND SOLO -ENS. CONTEST
The Suburban West Conference All -Senior Select Band
will perform at Hutchinson. High School on Tuesday, Feb-
ruary q, at 10:00 a.m. This concert will be followed
b the .-.nnual District Solo -Ensemble contest. The pub-
lic is invited to attend either or both of these events,
which is free of charge. Orono students in the band
are Vince Bartoletti, clarinet; Heidi Dwinnell, bass
clarinet; Jodi Buhrer, tuba; Ja.iet Bellingham, tenor
saxophone; and Kim Mikkelson, oboe.
A
��(vJrr *10
HIGH SCHOOL WINTER BAND CONCERT FEBRUARY 18
Thursday. Februar) 18 at 7:30 p.m. ,•rr c,a,,
has been set for the annual high
school Winter Band Concert. Featu? :f
will be the Wind Ensemble, Concert
Band, Stage Band and Jazz Ensemble.
The soloist for this concert will be
Diane Wegner, principal flute with the Orono Wind
Ensemble. Diane is the daughter of John and Barbara
Wegner of Long i.ake. She will play "Concertino,"
Opus 107 by Chaminade. The concert will include music
of contemporary composers as well as marches and pop-
ular music. There is a charge of $2.00 for adults and
$1.00 for students.
I r,t k ti, hu1tz
Band III rectot
BIG CONCERT FEBRUARY 16
Five bands will be featured in concert - The "Double
F. Band," from the Intermediat hool (Grade 5), will
open the program followed by the "Spartan Band,"
(Grade 6), and the "Middle School Band," (Grades 7 6 8).
The "Jazz Ensemble 88," (Grades 7 6 8), will entertain
plus the "University of Minnesota Jazz Ensemble."
Highlights will include a salute to the Minnesota
Twins World Champions. Concert time is 7:30 p.m.
in :he high school auditorium. Admissi•• is S2.UO.
Glen Johnson
IS/MS Band Director
OFONO ELEMENTARY PTA ANNUAL CARN.VAL TO BE HELD SATUR-
DAY, FEBRUARY 6 FROM 1:00 - 5.. P.M. AT 'fHE ORONO
MIDDLE SCHOOL. THERE WILL BE LOTS OF FUN. PRIZES AND
FOOD FOR EVERYONE!
EARLY CHILDHOOD HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL SCREENING
During the week of February 22-26. Early Childhood
Health and Develcpmental Screening will be held in
the Orono School District.
If you have a child ages 3j to 5 years you will be
contacted for an appointment for the Early Childhood
Health and Developmental Screening.
JoAnn Ree
District Nurse
Jd JAa �RRJi.z,,,,
GUIDANCI Ai ,LICE
- 10
UEcoming Test Dates:
SAT March 19, 1968 Regis. Deadline Feb. 12, 1988
ACT February 27. lg88 Regis. Deadline Jan. 29, 1988
In addition to the regular registration deadlines for
the listed tests, there -e late registration dead-
lines. An extra fee is involved ar guarantee of
getting your requested test center practice is
not encouraged except in an emerge, See your
counselor or consult the registratit.. packets for fur-
ther information.
Financial Aid Forms
Seniors and their parents are reminded to file either
the FFS (Family Financial Statement) or FAF (Financial
Aid Form) if they wish to be at all considered for
financial aid. Aid may come from a variety of sources
such as federal agencies, state agencies, the colleges
or schools themselves, and private corporations and
organizations. The one constant is that they all want
to see one of the above mentioned forms. Application
packets are available in the guidance office.
ONE -ACT FESTIVAL HOSTED BY ORONO
Congratulations to Shawn Strehlow, Andy Mechavich,
Wendy Gabriel, and Derrick Brown. All were awarded
Suburban -West Conference medals for their indivi' al
outstanding performances January 16 in the conference
one -act festival held here at Orono.
Orono's one -act play was "The Patient," a murder mys-
tery by Agatha Christie. Other students in the play
included Nick Coult, Jean Lee, Doug Beal, Kristin
Richard and Carrie Clement. Student director was
Heidi Dwlnnell.
other schools participating in the festival were Buf-
falo, Hutchinson and Glencoe.
At the and of the festival Orono presented a second
one -act play directed by senior Mark Tomlinson. It,
too, was a murder mystery entitled, "Any Body for Tea?"
Cast members included Steve Stroup, Brady Flaherty,
Ltz Scalf, Jodi Buhrer, Karl Pederson, Jennifer Smith,
Melissa McMahfll, Angela Gawron, and Robb Grandt.
Dee Nelson
Drama Director
Board Action Review
Regular Meetit! - December 14, 1987
* Approved the following coaches for winter sports:
Paul Stang, head basketball coach - boys; Steve
Schulte, assistant basketball coach - boys; Brian
Bergstrom, 9th grade basketball coach - boys; Steve
Boylan, assistant basketball coach - boys - (MS);
Bob Komma, assistant gymnastics coach; Dave Shavlik,
assistant hockey coach; Kelly Shaughnessy, head
wrestling coach; Roger Mischke, assistant wrestling
coach; Todd Meyer, assistant wrestling coach; Amy
Luesebrink, head ski coach; Hillary Woodworth, assis-
tant ski coach.
* Accepted the resignation of Tji',ske Vandervort as
emotional behavior disabilities teacher in the inter-
mediate/middle school effective January 1, 1988.
* Approved the appointment of Cheryl Nikko as Chapter
I instructional aide at Schumann Elementary School.
* Accepted the resignation of Carolint Mendelson as a
short -hour cook effective Aovember 19, 1987.
* Accepted the resignation of James Ahlschlager as
custodian in Schumann Elementary School effective
January 8, 1988.
* Approved the termination of Marjo Hubbell as middle
school health clerk effective November 13, 1987.
* Approved a variance request for Lee Bosma, kinder-
garten, to complete the 1987-88 school year at Wes-
tonka Schools.
* Approved a variance request for Anna Rangedahl,
grade 12, to complete her education at Orono Schools.
* Approved a variance requee.t for Frank Vukelich, kin-
dergarten, to attend the Orono Schools.
* Approved the recommended .:ourses for the Eaily Child-
hood Family Education program.
• Approved the recommendatiine set forth by the long-
range planning committee in staff development activ-
ities.
* Approve•.e Teachers' Master ronrract for the period
July 1, i87 to June 30, 1989 as negotiated by the
Board Negotiating Committee.
• Approved the contract for the Superintendunt of
Schools as negotiated by the Board's negotiating
team.
• Accepted the a-dit of school district records for
1986-87 as submitted by "roehling, Anderson,
Plowman b Egnell, Ltd.
* Approved the sixth assignment/position of instruc-
'ional technology coorcinator for the school district.
Activity Calendar
District Activities
2/1 Parent Meet 6 Confer - D. 0........ 7:00 p.m.
6 Elementary PTA Carnival M.S... 1:00-5:00 p.m.
8 Board Meeting - M.S. Vocal
Musir Room .........................7:00 p.m.
15 Presidents' Birthdays Observed NO SCHOOL
16 Newsletter Deadline D.O.
22 Board Meeting - H.S. Vocal
Music Room .........................7:00 p.m.
22-26 Early Childhood Health and Develop-
mental Screening
Elementary Activities
2/1-5 Artist in Residence - Charlie Maguire
6 PTA Carnival ..................1:00-5:00 p.m.
16 February Birthday Party
24 Ungraded Field Trip - all day
25 Grade 3 to nursing homes
Intermediate and Middle School Activities
2/2
Wrestling at Buffalo H.S........... 4:00
p.m.
3
7th Grade Career Fair
8th Grade Career Day
6
Elem/IS PTA Carnival - M.S.... 1:00-5:00
p.m.
13
Wrestling C Squad at Chaska
16
IS/MS Band Concert - H.S.
Auditorium .........................7:30
p.m.
17
IS/MS Band Assembly................1:15
p.m.
24
IS Reward Day
High
School Activities
2/2
Hockey - St. Louis Park - H........
7:30
p.m.
Girls Basketball - Henry - H.......
7:30
p.m.
Gymnastics - Breck - H.............7:30
p.m.
4
Boys Basketball - Mound - H........
7:30
p.m.
Girls Basketball at Mound ..........
7:30
p.m.
5
Wrestling at Hutchinson ............
7:30
p.m.
6
Hockey at Shakopee.................2:30
p.m.
Wrestling at Olivia................9:00
a.m.
Gymnastics Conference at Glencoe ...
1:00
p.m.
B
Gymnastics at St. Cloud Tech .......
7:30
p.m.
9
Hockey at Chaska...................7:30
p.m.
Boys Basketball at Shakopee ........
7:30
p.m.
Girls Basketball - Shakopee - H....
7:30
p.m.
Select Band -Solo 6 Ensembles
at Hutchinson .....................11:00
a.m.
11
Wrestling - Waconia - H............
7:30
p.m.
Ski - 6AA
12
Boys Basketball - Glencoe - H......
7:30
p.m.
Girls Basketball at Glencoe ........
7:30
p.m.
13
Hockey - Mound - H.................3:00
p.m.
Gymnastics 6AA
16
Hockey - Buffalo - H...............7:30
".m.
Girls Basketball-DeLaSalle-H.......
7:30
p.m.
Boys Basketball at Buffalo .........
7:30
p.m.
SNO-DAZE (16-19)
18
Baod Concert .......................7:30
p.m.
Gymnastics 6AA (18,20.24)
19
Girls Basketball - Buffalo - H.....
7:30
p.m.
State Ski
Wrestling 6AA (19,20.25,27)
Continued next column
High School Activities (continued)
20
Hockey - Hutchinson - H............
3:00
p.m.
22
Hockey 6AA (22,25,27,29, Mar 3,5)
Boys Basketball at Waconia.........
7:33
p.m.
Girls Basketball - Waconia-H......
7:33
p.m.
23
Precinct Caucus - No Events 6:00 -
8:00
p.m.
26
Boys Basketball - Hutchinson-H....
7:30
p.m.
Girls Basketball at Hutchinson .....
7:30
p.m.
Gymnastics State (26 6 27)
29
Sub West Choir Festival at Mound ...
3:00
p.m.
I NEi�SLETTER
";�
U
wow«rmurro« orrres
PAW
sww oCOMM "r sose «osn«
t.o«o Wla, 01«106907a slaw
L."e Lh•.
reswr NO 11
City cf Orono
P.O. Box 66
(- ystal 13ay MN 5�1323
South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety Department
143 OAK STREET
EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331.3095
RICHARD A. YOUNG
Chief
January 25, 1988
Chief Melvin Kilbo
Orono Police Department
1285 South Brown Road
P.O. Box 86
Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323
Dear Chief Kilbo:
(612) 474-3261
I would like to express my appreciation for the cooperation of
your department, and particularly Officers Morowczynski and
Moran, during our recent drug project. Officers Morowczynski,
Moran and your staff were invaluable in the assistance they
provided to Sgt. Talbot and this department. Officers
Morowczynski and Moran provided a great deal of manpower and
intelligence which was very beneficial to the project. They .also
assisted in the execution of search and arrest warrants at the
completion of the project.
Officers Morowczynski and Moran are to be commended for their
dedication. I can truly state the successful completion of the
project was due, in part, to the work of Officers Morowczynski
and Moran. Their actions reflect very favorably upon themselves
and the rest of your department.
Pies. e c :: ey my sincere thanks to Jf f icerz Morowczynski and
Moran and all of the others involved.
rely,
Richard A. You g
Chief of Police
Servnng South Lake Minnetonka Communities of Exce/seor Gieernwood, Shorewood and ronka Blev
RKs10NAl.ip�NrSIT SOA1iD
270 Metro Square Building
St Paul Minnesota 55101
612/292-8780
February 3, 1988
To: City Mayors
City Managers/Administration/Clerks
County Board Chairs
County Administrators
I am in the process of establishing an advisory committee of local officials to
advise our board on local government's point of view on pertinent transit
i ssues.
Our Chairman's Advisory Committee would consist of 15 city and county elected
officials and staff members. It would meet once a month on a day and time to
be determined by the committee's membership. It is my intention to call the
first meeting of this committee the latter part of March.
There are many issues currently before the Regional Transit Board that will be
discussed at committee meetings, including the development of new transit
services, light rail transit, transit financing, elderly and handicapped
transit service policies, and transit's property tax levy. It would be my
intention to discuss new ideas and seek assistance and advice in the develop-
ment of transit policies.
I would ask you make the creation of this advisory committee known to your city
council or county board members and appropriate staff. If you or other city or
county officials or staff have an interest in serving on this committee and
wish to be considered for appointment, please fill out the enclosed, brief
application form and return it to our office by February 19. Appointments to
the advisory committee will be based on a mix of local officials from various
geographic areas and types of communities (i.e., central city, oiL:.,r suburbs,
deve - ing suburbs, etc) .
Thank you for your assistance in the development of isory committee and
for your interest in transit. If you or others hay.. 2stions about this
cormittee, please contact me or my assistant, Mike Kuehn, aL iQ2-870G9.
Sincerely, _
Elliott Perovich
Chairman
E P : MK /mf
4n fquo+Oppo'tunify Emp
i
270 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
612,1292-8789
CHAIRMAN'S ADVISORY COMMITTEE
APPLICATION FORM
NAME:
ADDRESS: CITY ZIP CODE:
HOME PHONE: DAYTIME PHONE (If other than tome):
IN WHICH CITY/COUNTY ARE YOU A LOCAL OFFICIAL?
WHAT CAPACITY (i.e., Mayor. Council Member, City Manager. etc.)?
LIST BRIEFLY ANY LOCAL GOVERNMENT EXPERIENCE YOU WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE:
I wish to be considered for appointment to the RTB's Chairman's kcivisory
Committee.
Signature
Date
po►it• ♦t h.• .µ
we're s la. .
t• Uw i01001111M ow so r lift t 640 1' " • f I
si•mw. Lemu. ob4ww.
COUNTY STATE AID WGN-NAY HM d
1'�
• r
7rtwq �
i
1%
r •-
s
'3
�.. Lam�•.
c•
�. trretti IYt tus Is • trsw ad Nnoct 'Otisr adttro I • lomp"
•.•. Mimmmsfywrtas r we �rirt M t+• tstoorttlwte mar~ of fuaa tf.
w rNlwrt♦n�tr i ~�• some tnt tr •► tsN fwR�en ern"+
tlasre t>M,s{ twt fire of as l•sRb+sl tars7l d1 ire frstawR i•irt,o►.
trrtsr fig Prri kw wt* air lstlal Itdl• of sold boom" awty • oss-sold
r $17.11 t�rw. art ur" ~011*3 .•o ". tea saw of00" 4�w
anu► • ost-a d• 4M.0 •o" to tar %0~1► 114W of Como Now r. •..
tsioar aresswssM► d• use smewl? Ito• d trlq tow W • tp'.uls
• root 40 wo tdse Its of said fwRtlom awty Mst" Mas %K 2" of
va Post •r wpwmrs. tramm loam an "0 can Is" I sMd lutist dWFW
• IN I ,r dr SWO h!t to t4 OWN •1up"W al . am to ptatHo of a
wmse so tots Gm dl t.st" Lwow if am sit rl/pt to low dfrir t►
p9mmans or we mar!• 4.
lcd1. p- am 0 s OWN".. I rs .
ftls• s
..�dt
s l.�1 w
sn ir
Imoull-t. swir ltrs�. •ut rs a+n+t
0 - 14" ".d"
Preliminary Plat for
Richard D. Ziminski
in the Southwest Quarter of Section 27-118 J,
—
Hennepin County, minnesota
- - /v.,M 1,, l.0. W. /v-t
COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY NO, 6
---
37.•;
e
2a �.t
I �-
yif IV9 S,
..H.C.S5qq
Ps ie�s„ dopX�3s. y.
oyCcc �S� iF,ee
'.
°
-- ---�
33'
`r
-�
�,dY�P
o� Rehr hr of �✓S
-- —�
��Bu�ld'�n9
`
setback
t }
`
I;ries l+YP�coU;.
Q
I
0
p
R I!
n
L-5
I
m
11, a,
ww o .i
M Z
'•�
50 , a
Z. oO Oren
03
-El W
LU
;.1
4
n
ter`
�fOPe5e3 ri,J�d'in 1,I1!
z
2
y-
.1 4' a pa ire/ S r.y+ /•;e
• of sW '%v o-/ «. z-•-i�?-Z
I
I <i'
i
30
30.
I
'
~
H
I
F—
I
`�Build'rt�9 setback lines (typ��at)-,
O
Z
! i
.• �gr�N•��—I
27�„8-27
I
.
.�
o
N
279 •! i'
__
Zoe'
u
1 hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey o
E^+�
H
of the boundaries of that part of the Southwest quarter of Section 27,
Township 118 North, Range 23 Nest of the Sth Principal Meridian, described
as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of said Southwest quarter It, :7- '/v -
Z3
distant 1705.15 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Southwest quarter;
thence Nest parallel with the South line of said Southwest quarter a distance
of 517.77 feet; thence North parallel with the East line of said Southwest _
quarter a distance of 469.95 feet to the Southerly line of County Road No. 6;
thence Northeasterly on said Southerly line of County Road No. 6 intersecting
a point on the East line of said Southwest quarter distant 518.65 feet North of
the point of beginning; thence South On the E;at !ur, jr sail Southwest, quarter
a distance of 518.65 feet to the point of beginning, and the location of an
existing building and driveway thereon. It does not purport to show other im-
provements or encroachments.
Scale: 1" = 60' COFFIN 8 GRONBERG, INC.
Date 9-25-87, nv. i-�!•!s, �•:r•!ar 7� � �}
o Iron marker
Mark S. uronberg Reg. 6. 12755
Engineers, Land Surveyors and Planners
Long Lake, Minnesota
97-414
Preliminary Plat for
Richard D. Ziminski
in the Southwest Quarter of Section 27-118-23
Hennepin County, Minnesota
c. `mil .. .. a✓S...dLa./� t', o.,r. L'nc
COUNTY S-, . ATE AID HIGHWAY NO. 6
494. in
Nso`Y+ - 247't
dN0. a:_X M M.
s e•w 77jj•1
70.
C
� \ `��Bolldln Se+back i
11rie s l9+y p'I ce u;
\� I
• �N,, �;• F I/a•\p�
.ttl O •t
G� \pp 0%) Sa
ZOO "Ary
90' I ( a ':� •� M a
4` I ProPeyCd dlvld'Inq 'no
Mvek
•Bulldln9 setback lines «yplcal)-.1 I (I
27-118-17
N
_.. 2 Wt
hereby certify that this is a true and correcL representaLion of a survey
c' :he boundaries or that part of the Southwest quarter of Section 27,
L—iiship 118 North, Range 23 West or the 5th Principal Meridian, described
as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of said Southwest quarter
distant 1705.15 feet North of the Southeast corne,• of said Southwest quarter;
'hence West parallel with the South line of said Southwest quarter a distance
of 517.77 feet; thence North parallel with the East line of said Southwest
quarter a distance of 469.53 feet to the Southerly line of County Roed 'to. 6;
thence Northeasterly on said Southerly line of County Road No. 6 intersecting
a point on the East line of said Southwest quarter distant 518.65 feet North of
the point of beginning; thence South on the East line of said Southwest quarter
a distance of 518.65 feet tl :he point of beginning, and the loc-!:on of an
existing building and drivewz+ thereon. It does not purport to show other im-
provements or encroachments.
Ir[) C
33' J3'
Q I rJ
CQ..1p I I_
I
H
ff8-L7
`
c
So�+f• '/r � eF
s c, S7•ffa-Z3•_ •
Scale: V = 60' COFFIN 8 GRONBERG, INC.
Date 9-25-8
o Iron markarke•
Mar;: S. Gronberg Rcv. r. 12755
Engineers, Land Surveyors and Planners
Long Lake, Minnesota
foil-494
`\ \ 1� \ 1_•, \U'/// I/'/ noi]= 1 T9905
Ia7J
XTgT3°- 970
to as T 9q 5, \
TAT
T t
T9q is � �\
r994.1
Ian O ,�3. � � 1♦ .� if TIelO- `\ 8 I 1
974— ' x 1 \�- 1 1'Toil� \ -` TViI�' I� ,
�7-9T0 Ox }� 'j +11 lel� T ool� 1 T1001 ,
I
v 1 0/0
C \
1 y \ T r9as� -•� \ i j r \/G°°- j
"dog*, 94�
91, �� \
O k
Ile 7
Tj
,(:97g I 6 1 0 11T- iyy3i
_ Y _
r T9a9= /
1P
(SHEETi7l
- i/• 1)'�
S00 )Ob �W EEE*
,.
J�
33
0
33 1 33
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
FOR JOHN F. 11UGAN
IN TRACT A R.I 1447
HENNEPIN COUNT'i. " tiOTA
�pour,/► Z
Scal
-S- i
1 j>;•360 �� �. / / ed f RG�.
enr 5
Spot elevation
'NviK
— :Z Apprneifi
OrolleW �
' �Qi, •�1 —• ow
d ileea 4rG4 and W ,1\ n
i � 1k� owllen — }. _... tceci4e bae\Cwaiec �hro.+�i� c c\
a s'•. _ �• SQ un c Ctys�1 a4 aooa whl0 1_
i4 a� rich.
\ j +P.7 4eEA j ��' � v�f COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC
g/BF M Engineers and Land
e; I W. Ole so
0., \\ s f's. s - Surveyors
�.•�`J� Long Lake, Minnesota
\ S r.{ - .L` 11.d
\ \ Iw19
y
\ \ T.: FJm •� �6•s
\ \ \ 5' .. 80. Oe LLScrd1eci T gcv55 o��er'
•�` \ \ \ g„1, ...5. w LaT�?dir Cc1llht.X.'t' O
loh.
1
rDen l Nr iNn nDAI NArI DI AN
I
J
Fa-
r
Cr
V
\ S-
l�lert
/ VA
lot, — —
ion
�yci—• lob
`=
-.! — Apprei.mn\e 4 to
jOres %e\a a ici
S t— \ I.. \ �, Q.
i
%• i 96H}
L ` .. _ Rom-ram.-�i'4
\ \ 4,
Stale: 1' = 40'
Date : 8 - 6 - 86 ! Re't, 10 -3 -b<.
Datum: Assumed
9ii: Spct elevation
N.{es
1. C Areh under as Crystal Ba'l RA. 'Is
2. Wa\er °wnea ye,•a„e
and, 4)° A area `o d w,%\ noir
ecea4e backwaiec +\pro . h '-Wec\
and a Crys�q\ F3ay Rooa�wh\.Vt!
'P"e e.-1 ee4 ti��her W a� rim.
COFFIN E GRONBERG, INC
Eagineers and Land
Surveyors
Long Lake, Minnesota
3. A1\ d's� rbad a��s site\\
be
Ce A'! k--
w
LL
lj
Ll Ell 11
5 T k F— r,
J T U
ol.
PUBLIC WORKS
s Cl 'Now
%J
14
L!l
5 'r ;t F- E- -r
Alk*t Cft��-I%
L
—%o-j
.jo sc-&.IL
4
m I A. P,
Li
ST.,
ice` ; / � /����.
I ' I PROGRAMMING FORM
B')AMAN & ASSOCIATES
gas HMIH FWMI ST-
K*NWApnlS NIWMESOTA 55401. (612) 339-3752
!s / /it
PROJECT PROT
COKIISSIEN NO.
ff. / ar / a / t- / Z. / L / x / / / I / k.
yemi LE Q aau1PNewr =omy- (igm ev)
IL \ 1x \ to \ 16. \ e. \ % \ 6 \ Z4. \ /3• \ 5 \ 4 \ 16.
/a. \ /Zl/OX' 12\ A \ \ \
-PPMENT NHS zm'-O'
INSIDE HEATED STORAGE
PUBLIC WORKS STREETS 6 UTILITIES d PARKS
DEPT, PUBLIC VORKS
FUNCTION OR AOCOMMODAIIDN
VEHICLE 370/44a
86 -o x 1"1-0 = !3 4f6 S.),(PROSOM NMIX)
Oro,-*x s8i-0 s 4'988 &FS.f C FUTUCO NEM)
7br/14.
w RE rxAwuorr 1
(4)- FAW-MP 71 K4Z y
y
I
QUANTITY
NO:
3
16.
3/4 Ton Pickup With Plows (6' x 221)
1
8.
1980 Ford LTD Sedan (5' x 181)
2
17.
Portable Generator Sets (1-45KVA; 1 30KVA) (7' x 151)
4
1.
Single Axle Dump Truck (8'-261)
1
9.
Portable Air Compressor (9 x 5)
1
18.
Mechanical Rodder - Trailer Mount (4' x 61)
2
2.
One Ton Dump Truck (8'-23' r/plot)
1
10.
Hustler Lawn Tractor (6 x 10)
1
19.
1/2 Ton Pickup 4 Wheel Drive (5' x 181)
1
3.
Road Grader (12' x 28')
1
12.
John Deere Lawn Tractor (5 x 10)
1
20.
1984 Ford LTD Sedan (5' x 181)
1
4.
Front End Load (7'-& x 220)
1
12.
Ford Lawn Tractor (5 x 6)
1
21.
Mal,bury Steam Cleaner - Trailer Mount (6' x 41)
1
5.
5.
Tractor Loader Backhoe (7'�" x 31')
1
13.
Lawn Vacuum - Trailer Mount (4 x 6)
1
22.
Rubber Tire Roller (8' x 101)
1
Tractor1 x
John Deere Utility Tractor (7' x 12')
1
14.
5 Ton Static Steel Drum Roller (4 x 9)
1
23.
Skid Steer Loader - Proposed (5' x 101)
1
7.
1/2 Ton 4 Wheel Drive x 1)
1
15.
High Pressure Jet rodder - on 28.000 GVW Chassis
1
24.
Street Sweeper - Proposed (8' x 181)
(8 x 23 )