The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11-13-1989 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meetingPUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO �Q(,�/��• �/�� MEETING DATE -I l d 7 PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) i. - a 2. 3,- - AL 4 . s. 6. 8. 9. 0. 1. 2. 3. 4. S. 6. 7. 8. 9. 0. AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1989, 7:00 P.M. (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. COUNCIL MEETING ROLL CALL NOV 13 1989 1. Presentation by Mayor - Lt. Gary Cheswick 2. CONSENT AGENDA* CITY Of ORONO APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 3. Regular Meeting of October 23, 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Maureen Bellows Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT "APPLICANTS" Immediately after the Council has reviewed your application please sign the three (3) original resolution copies. 4. #1413 Daniel Hoffman/J. Voltoft, 1135 Heritage Lane A. Lot Line Rearrangement - Resolution B. Vacation of Utility Easement - Resolution 5. #1442 The Landschute Group, Inc., 3300 Bayside Road/375 Leaf Street - Final Subdivision - Resolution 6. #1463 Contel of Minnesota, Tonkaview Lane/County Road 19 - Variance/Conditional Use Permit 7. #1468 George Pillsbury, 1300 Bracketts Point Road - Variance/Conditional Use Permit - Resolution ENGINEER'S REPORT 8. Old Crystal Bay Road Bridge - Plans and Specifications - Resolution * 9. Change Order #1 Highway 12 Sewer and Water MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 10. 1990 Budget - Preliminary Resolution 11. Tax Forfeited Property - Fairview Covenant Church 12. Stubbs Bay Sewer 13. West Hen.:epin Human Services Planning Board - Resolution 14. Water System Development 15. Christmas Tree Lighting - Navarre * 16. Emergency Preparedness Siren Bids * 17. 1949 Fagerness Point Road Hazardous Building - Resolution * 18. Assessing Services 1990-91 AGENDA P:;k COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1989, 7:00 P.M. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S * 19. Wayzata Country Club/Hauser Road Agreement - Resolution * 20. Drug Awareness Resistance Education (DARE) Program Status * 21. County Road 116 - Environmental Impact * 22. Deborah Drive - Hold Harmless Agreement * 23. Nava;ro'Redevelopment r1eet.ng * '�4. AdmEni.4trefor's Information, Highway 12 Feasibility Study Bighway 12 1992 Safety Improvement 1972 Shadywood 3536 -lyric Avenue Fail Cl&n Up Status Summary of Receipts and Disbursements - September Electronic Funds Transfers Goal Setting Status CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT LICENSES (25*) BILLS (26*) ADJOURNMENT UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 11/08 - Council/PC Mtg-Facilities 11/18 - Navarre Redevelopment Riverside Medical Center A 1a4m ,enure of St Marv's Fairview Dneomm Gates and Famiew Rne side 11,0 Ent 21;a Sir-7 AosDA113 'd, .td,r-es PIP COUNCIL MEETING NOV 13 1989 b-4k- CITY OF ORONO a ,7o &t�L -f� .wm_ a .G.:at .6 ;&e.� ae� A" a Auwx z v U �0 •�.7r+ �C�t+�.To /a 4�s��iL/,.cic�.0 �..c�' I �p,�,�,�w d ay.. �,c.� ,�•�� e.� .�.�:.�. c�.�o .�.,� �:. Ar.s«�a •r•�, �LazE.� as cL Ac.E, ao l.A.4 c4o0se,,Y.av OL 'itwivA." i- COUNCIL MEETING NOV 13 1983 MINUTlsS OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF CITY oeo�o HEY OCTOBER 23, 1989 C� 1 r OR ONO 7:00 P.M. The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Grabek, Councilmembers Goetten, Nettles, Peterson and Callahan. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, Public Works Director Gerhardson, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron, City Engineer Cook, City Attorney Barrett, and City Recorder Scheff ler. WOODHILL COU'dTRY CLUB LIQUOR LICENSE PUBLIC HEARING 7:00 P.M. TO 7:10 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. Mark Albrecht was present as a representative of the Woodhill Country Club. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that Woodhill Country Club wished to obtain a liquor license for social events taking place in the barn facility. Bernhardson said that the main issue involved in this applicaticn is that a conditional use permit will be necessary. He suggested that approval of the liquor license be conditioned upon the Country Club submitting an application for a conditional use permit. There were no comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Goetten indicated that she had no objections to the liquor license, but questioned whether the conditional use permit should be approved prior to approval of the liquor license. Bernhardson said that the City's initial inclination was to make the liquor license subject to the Country Club obtaining a conditional use permit and the license would not go into effect until that time. Bernhardson suggested that perhaps it would be best to indicate whether it would be appropriate for the Country Club to have the liquor license, but hold the license until a conditional use permit is granted. Goetten indicated that she would prefer to proceed in that manner. Councilmember Nettles questioned what the Country Club had done in the past without a liquor license? Bernhardson explained that the Country Club had not served liquor in the barn previously, but rather provided set ups to customers bringing their own liquor. The Country Club would like to have control over the alcohol served at the facility and must 1 M 17-P)IBS OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING ZELD OCTOBER 23, 1989 �ipObHILL CbUNTRY CLUB CONTINUED obtain a liquor license to do so. The Club does possess a liquor license for their main Clubhouse located in the Wayzata City limits. Mr. Albrecht confirmed Bernhardson's explanation and added that the Country Club receives approximately 20 requests per year for events serving alcohol. He said that he has been advised by their insurance carrier not to alle— persons to bring their own liquor. Nettles believed that under the Scate's "social host rules" that the City would be able to exercise more control or at least offer more protection to the public if the Country Club had a license because there would then be dramshop coverage. Mayor Grabek indicated that he had no preference as to whether the conditional use permit be obtained prior to the liquor license being issued as long as both were obtained. Councilmember Callahan said that if the Zoning Code requires that the conditional use permit be granted prior to a liquor license being approved that the Council should proceed in that manner. City Administrator Bernhardson asked City Attorney Barrett if it would be possible to make the liquor license conditioned upon the conditional use permit being approved. The liquor license would not be effective until the conditional use permit process is completed. Mayor Grabek questioned whether the conditional use permit would require a public hearing? Bernhardson replied that a public hearing would be required on the Planning Commission Level. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to approve the request for a liquor license, conditioned upon the Country Club obtaining a conditional use permit. The liquor license will not go into effect until such time that the conditional use permit process is completed. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=0, Motion passed. STREET LIGHTING PROPOSED SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENT SHORELINN DRIVE i SHADYNOOD ROAD PUBLIC HEARING 7:10 P.M. TO 7:15 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mai 'ere duly noted. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the :eet lighting assessments to Grace Baptist Church and Lenox Glass were based on a residential use, rather than a non-residential use. MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MREiTNG HELD OCTOBE 23, 1989 STREET LIGHTING CONTINUED This supplemental hearing is necessary in order to assess them as non-residential use. The question with Lenox Glass is whether their assessment should be based upon 65' of front footage or reduced by the amount of easement that the City has over the property. Bernhardson said that the assessment could be reduced at a later time if the Council adopted the larger amount this evening. He said that a per foot rate could be adopted. There were no comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Callahan felt that it was unfair to assess other similar facilities one way and these facilities another. Councilmember Goetten questioned whether churches were allowed any special assessment consideration? It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2724, adopting the Supplemental Street Lighting Improvement Assesssments on County Road 15, subject to reducing the assessment for Lenox Glass should the City find it necessary to do so based on per -foot calculation excluding the City°s easement. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=O, Motion passed. CONSENT AGENDA* Councilmember Goetten requested removal of item #39. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve the Consent Agenda with the exception of Item #39 which was removed and discussed in the order it appears on the agen0a. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=O, Motion passed. APPROVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve the Minutes of the September 25, 1989 Regular Council Meeting. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=O, Motion passed. APPROVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of September 27, 1989. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=0, Motion passed. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT Representative JoEllen Hurr was unable to attend this meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Planning Commission Representative Moos was not present for this meeting. PUBLIC COMMENTS ^)semary Schauer questioned whether the Mayor had any statement of information regarding the sewer plant property. 3 MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING EELD OCTOBER 23, 1989 PUB*..IC COMMENTS CONTINUZD Mayor Grabek said that the City was in receipt of the second draft of an agreement between Long Lake and Orono concerning the exchange of that property for certain restrictive covenants or, the property. Mayor Grabek was hopeful that an agreement would be reached by the end of the year. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: #1368 MCNBLLIS/PRUDDEN 315/355 WOODHILL POAD REQ13ST FOR EXTENSION OF FILING DEADLINE DATE RESOLUTION #2716 It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2716, extending the filing deadline date of Resolution #2621. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays-O. Motion passed. #1411 SUSSEX SQUARE DEVELOPMENT 3020 FOX STRUM PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #2725 Ms. Nina Wildman, the developer, was present for this matter, as was Mr. Mark Gronberg, her surveyor. City Administrator Bernhardson provided a brief explanation of this application for a 17-lot subdivision. Dr. William (Greg) Lawton, questioned what preliminary plat approval meant? He said that he has disputed the original property boundary lines. Bernhardson explained preliminary plat approval. Dr. Lawton said that he had written a letter to the Planning Commission and ::-juncil regarding the boundary line dispute. He said that the Planning Commission had assured him that this subdivision wz)ul3 not go any further without resolution of the boundary line discrepancy. As3istant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that condition #5 in the proposed resolution for preliminary plat approval addressed that issue. Mayor Grabek asked that Dr. Lawton be put on the mailing list to receive any further documents from the City regarding and that a letter be sent to rim mentioning receipt of his letter and providing him with a complete copy of the Subdivision file to date. Councilmember Goetten asked the developer what the status of the boundary lire dispute is at this time. Mr. Gronberg indicated that he had called Mr. Lawton's residence and informed his wife that he would be willing to meet 4 MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL NNETING HELD OCTOBER 23, 1989 ZONING FILE #1411-SOSSEX SQUARE DEVELOPMENT CONTINUED with the Lawton's attorney. Councilmember Goetten asked whether the applicant was 7roposing any entrance monuments? Mr. Gronberg said that entrance monuments were being proposed. He also questioned whether there was a need for the proposed Outlot A to the northeast: City Administrator Bernhardson said that the City's recommendation is to leave the Outlot as proposed and should it prove to be unnecessary in the future, it could be abandoned at a later time. City Engineer Cook said that the developer had an opportunity to place the Outlot at any location. He believed that it was a little late at this time to ask for a revision. Dr. Lawton questioned how logic is served by placing the Outlot as proposed? He said 0 3t running a road across the property is really of no benefit to anyone. Gronberg presented the landscape plan for the Council to review. Councilmember Goetten asked if there was adequate screening for the "exception"? Gronberg replied that some of the existing woods extend beyond that boundary and that there are no houses proposed in that area. Planning Commissioner Representative Kelley noted that screening and landscaping were concerns expressed by abutting property owners at the Planning Commission Meeting. Mayor Grabek asked Dr. Lawton if the landscape plan appeared to be acceptable to him? Dr. Lawton replied that overall, he had no objections to the subdivision. He only wished to see the boundary line discrepancy resolered . Mr. Allan Carlson believed that Mrs. Wildman had done a good O Gronberg showed the proposed location for the entrance monuments, and noted that they would be set back from the right- of-way so there would be no interference with sight distances. Mayor Grabek indicated that he would have no objections to the entrance monuments as long as they were placed out of the right-of-way and did not interfere with sight lines. 5 MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTCIBER 23, 1989 ZONING FILE #1411-SUSSEX SQUARE DEVELOPMENT CONTINUED Gronberg asked Public Works Director Gerhardson if there are any considerations that must be given as to the location of the monuments and maintenance of the drainage and utility easement? Gerhardson said that he would have to review the proposed monument location more closely to make any determination. Ccuncilmember Goetten ques• aned whether the landscape plan would be submitted for review by City staff? Mayor Grabek replied that the landscape and entrance monument plan would need to be submitted. ;saffron asked which road configuration the Council preferred to sere? Gronberg said that the developer had no preference as to which scheme is used. Gronberg said that the original proposal was designed so as to discourage through traffic_. Mayor Grabek indicated that he preferred t'te Planning )mmission's recommendation. City Engineer Cook questioned whether Outlot C would be developed at thi time? Gronberg replied that a portion of it wou"d be developed so as to facilitate emergency vehicles. Gaffron clarified that the- road would be continuous with a "T" intersecti:;n. It was moved by Mayc,r Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to adopt Resolution #2725, approving the Preliminary Subdivision for Sussex Square Development, :020 Fcx Street. Motion, Ayes=S, Nays=O, Motion passed. # 14 41 DON COPLEY 1185 TONKANA ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2717 Mr. Copley was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson briefly explained thin application. 8e s-Rid that Mr. Copley has indicated his willingness to remove the existing accessory structure which will bring hardcover in the 75-250' setback area to 25.5%. An additional 72 s.f. of hardcover could be removed from a portion of the driveway, however, staff believes it is necessary to have room to turn around in the driveway. Councilmember Goetten said that she too was concerned about removing a portion of the driveway. She said that she appreciated the efforts made by Mr. Copley to keep hardcover to a minimum. L KINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING RBLD OCTOBER 23, 1989 ZONING FILE #1441-CC7'LEY CONTINUED It was moved Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2717, approving the hardcover variance and average lakeshore setback variance for Mr. Don Copley, 1185 Tonkawa Road. Motion, Ayes=S, Nays=0, Motion passed. #1452 HALTER PEMBERTON 1720 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCE Mr. PzxTberton was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained this application to the Council and Mayor Grabek. Councilmember Goetten said that she was surprised that hardcover in the 75-250' zone was not addressed at the Planning Commission meeting. She said that 58% in that area is far too much. She said that she would like to see a decrease in hardcover in the 75-2501 area if this application is proposed. Goetten said that sh- did not oppose the structure being proposed, if something could be worked out with the staff to remove existing hardcover. Mayor Grabek expresEad his concern with the conversion of decks into Q*ructure. Mayor Grabek said that hi could not see the hardship for placing the addition in the 0-75' setback zone. Councilmember Goetten asked Mr. Pemberton if it would be possible to locate the addition elsewhere? Councilmember Callahan indicated that he agreed wits. the Planning Commissioners that voted aga'_nst app:-.)val of this application. Mr. Pcinberton indicated that he did not understand how the deck, which is hardcover, would be allowed, but putting a ro-)f over the deck and closing it in without extending it further toward the lake is not allowable. He said that he d'd not understand why he would be asked to remove hardcover from the front of the house when he is not proposing to do anything to the front of the house. Mayor Grabek said that the City is trying to protect the area between 0' and 75' of the lakeshore. Mayor Grabek said that the City would set a prece::=nt by allowing structures to be built in that area. Grabek said that each-pplicatien is reviewed for a hardship that will warrant the approval of a variance. Mr. Pemberton reiterated his inability to understand how his proposal would have any more impact on the lake than what is currently existing. He noted that the hardcover being rem-vP,4 in front of the house is more than double than the are? being converted into the addition on the back of the house. 7 MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 23, 1989 ZONING FILE #1452-PEMBERTON CONTINUED Councilmember Goetten tried to offer dr. Pemberton a further explanation of the difference between deck and structure. She too informed Mr. Pemberton that she could see no hardship for the variance. Mr. Pemberton said that the only hardship he can offer is that he purchased the house with the assumption that: there would be no difficulty in obtaining a varianc,? to do this addition. City Administrator Bernhardson said that the City has no records pertaining to the existing deck being allowed. Counci lmer+ber Net* les questioned whether the City has any specific policies regarding covering over decks? Bernhardson replied thp.t there is nothing directly dealing with that issue. He said that in the 0-75' zone thn City prefers no encroachment at all. He said that there have previously been requests for minor encroachment into that area and in cases where there is an existing deck, the City has requested that the deck he removee. Nettles said that he disagr-ed with the policy categorizing decks as hardcover since they are water permeable. He said that in regard to this application, the City Las two goals. Qne is to reduce hardcover, which Mr. Pemberton's proposal would do, and the other is to prevent the conversion of decking into structure. He s&id that he could not see a hardship for the variance. Councilmember Gceti-en offered Mr. Pemberton an opportunity to propose another location for the addition. Mr. Pemberton said teat there is no other location f^r the addition that would allow them to enlarge the 8ining room. Mayor Grabek said that he would not approve the application as presented. He objected to the excessive hardcover currently existing, the building of a structure on an existing deck that was not approved by the City and adding a deck beyond that structure further into the 0-75' zone. Mayor Grabek advise or. Pemberton that he could request ':he tabling of this application to allow time to revise his proposal. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to table this application to allow any revision to the proposal that would not encroach into the 0-75'. Councilmember Goetten suggested the addition of language requiring severe reduction of the hardcover. Mayor Grabek incorporated Goetten's suggebtion into his motion. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=O, Motion passed. 8 MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 2.1, 1989 #1453 WII,LIAM HIBBS 1905 PAGERNESS 1-nINT ROAD VARIANCE Mr. HL bbs wa- not present for this review. City Administrator Bernhardson recommended tabling this matter until Mr. Hibbs could attend. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by C, ncil;.ember Peters=n, to table application #1453. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=0, #1458 BLAKE BICHANICH 332 WESTLAKE STREET VAPIANCB Mr. Blake Bichanich was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that this application involved a request for a side setback variance to construct a second story addition Mr. Bichanich said that he hoped to combine the two lots as soon as possible. He was hopeful that City sewer would go through the area, but in the mean time he was asking for an allowance or variance that would allow him to modestly alter the existing residence. Councilmember Goetten thought that Gaffron's suggestion tc, extend the drainfield seemed reasonable. Gaffron ela...)rated on his recommendations for the septic system. Mayor Grabek thought it would be best f^_ ,!low the addition, leave the septic system as is until such time there is an indication of failure, --r,u then try the additi -)d 1 drainfield. Grabek said that hopefully sewer would be availan by that time. Bernhardson said that the City would like o work out an agreement with the applicant that would require him to extend the drainfield when needed or p»mp if the extension is not possible. He would also explore with the City Attorney whether it would be legal to require the applicant to sign an appeal waiver for any future sewe- assessments. Mayor Grabek es'ced Gaffron whether the- q were defined standards that would indicate a septic system is tailing so there can be no dispute? Gaffron said if there was seepage, there would be nc question of failure. However, there are gray areas leading up to that point. Mayor Grabek asked N.r. Bichanich if he would object to a condition of approval that would require him to extend the drainfield if the present septic system failed. 9 MINUTE;. jF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HEIM OCTOBER 23, 1989 ZONING FILE #1458-BICHANICH CONTINUED Mr. Bichanich indicated that would be reasonable. Bernhardson asked if the Council could table this matter to provide time to work out acceptable language for the resolution. Councilmember Callahan questioned whether Lot 4 would provide additional drainfield sites if needed? Gaffron said that combining the two lots would not solve the problem of finding a septic system location. Gaffron said that the combination would provide additional room to extend the drainfield. Gaffron said that he would like to have a special lut combination or other document that would place any future owner of Lot 4 on notice, that there is the need for the encroachment into that I,nt for the extension of the drainfield. Councilmember Goetten noted that there had been 4 persons residing at this residence prior to Mr. Bichanich purchasing the property. There were no problems with the septic system during that time period. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to table this application and have staff work with the applicant regarding appropriate language pertaining to the existing and future needs for sewer/septic on this property. Motion, Ayes:•5, Nays=O, Motion passed. #1459 JAMS MULVANNY 559 PARK LANE VARIANCES RESOLUTION #2718 Mr. and Mrs. Mulvanny were present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson informed the Council and Mayor Grabek that the Mulvannys were requesting approval of an average lakeshore setback and hardcover variance to construct an addition over an existing deck. Mayor Grabek said that this type of application really put the Council in a difficult position. Mayor Grabek explained the danger of setting a precedent. Mr. Mulvanny replied that unlike many of his neighbors, he has a double lot. Mr. Mulvanny said that the house was built in 1917. Councilmember Goetten quest.ionod the purpose of the addition? Mr. Mulvanny replied that the addition would increase the size of the dining room and bedroom which are both very small. Goetten questioned whether there was any other location for the addition that would not encroach into the 75-250' setback 10 M174UTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 23, 1989 ZONING FITS #1459-MULVANNY CONTINUED zone? Mr. Mulvanny s:,id that due to the layout of the house, it would rot be of any use to put the addition elsewhere. It was moved by Coucilmember Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to deny this application. Councilmember Goetten questioned whether the applicant should be given the option of tabling the application to present a revised proposal. Gaffron said that this addition would be located outside of the 0-75' setback zone, unlike the Pemberton application reviewed earlier this evening. Goetten said that there was stili. the question of whether to allow hardcover structure over deck hardcover. City Administrator Bernhardson asked whether the Council would approve such an application if the existing deck were not present? Councilmember questioned what hardship was mentioned in the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval? Goetten replied that the small size of the house was considered to be a hardship. Gaffron added that with respect to the average lakeshore setback, the addition would not interfere with any of the neighbors sight lines. Mayor Grabek commented that if this application were presented as is without the existing deck, he would be inclined to approve it. He said that the addition would not be located in the 0-75' setback zone, and is being added to a small, existing house. Cou-cilmember Goetten concurred. Councilmember Peterson questioned whether there was any other hardcover that the applicant could remove? Mr. Mulvanny said that only the driveway could be ren:cved. Mayor Grabek said that the applicant was not increasing the amount of hardcover and asking him to remove hardcover would be penalizing him. Councilmember Nettles indicated that he was confused as to the City's policy regarding the covering over of decks. Goetten suggested that the City take a closer look at this issue. "otion, Ayes=2, Goetten, Grabek, Peterson, Nay. Motion failed. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2718, allowing the addivion with no increase in hardcover. Approval is based on the fact that the addition will not encroach into the 0-75' zone. Councilmember Goetten commented that if there was no existing deck on this property, she would have approved the variance request. Goetten said that the deck is going to be removed. Motion, Ayes=3, Callahan, Nettles, Nay. Motion passed. #1461 REV. PAUL W. BERGGREN 585 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD S VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2719 Reverend Berggren was not present for the review of this applic:a;...,11. City Administrator Bernhardson gave a brief explanation of this application. 11 MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 23, 1989 ZONING FILE #1461-BERGGREN CONTINUED It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2719, approving the side setback variance to construct an attached, enclosed porch. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=O, Motion passed. #1462 RICHARD A. SCHM.IDT 3980 WATERTOWN ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2720 Ms. Roberta Schmidt was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that this application involved a request for a front setback variance for a proposed second story addition. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2720, approving the front setback variance to construct a second story addition. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=0, Motion passed. #1464 CHARLES NADLER 2509 KELLY AVENUE VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2721 Mr. and Mrs. Nadler were present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson informed the Council and Mayor Grabek that the applicants were seeking approval of a hardcover and average lakeshore setback variance for an addition. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to adopt Resolution #2721, approving the hardcover and average lakeshore setback variance. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=0, Motion passed. #1466 DAN KOKESH 4040 WATERTOWN ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2722 Mr. Kokesh was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that this application involved a request foz front and side setback variances to construct a screen porch and open deck. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to adopt Resolution #2722, approving Lh� front and side setback variances to construct a screen porch an: oven deck. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=0, Motion passed. 12 MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL METING HELD OCTOBER 23, 1989 ENGINEER'S REPORT LIFT STATION 10/43 - THIRD PAYMENT* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve the third payment to Albrecht Excavating, Inc., for the sewer improvement Lift Station No. 10 & 43, in the amount of $25,8714.09. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=O, Motion passed. MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor Grabek took this opportunity to publicly thank everyone that supported the Centennial celebration. He extended special thanks to the Council, the Gash family, and the Pioneer and Laker. Mayor Grabek reminded everyone that the Centennial Book was still available to purchase for $14.95. Councilmember Goetten asked Bernhardson about the status of the DARE Program. City Administrator Bernhardson replied that there had been delays in implementing the plan, but that he would contact the Superintendent of the Orono Schools and keep the Council apprised of any developments. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION 1540 FOX STREET Mrs. Morrison was present for this matter City Administrator Bernhardson explained that i!s. .-nrrison had applied for a subdivision, but it was determined that there was not a suitable alternate drainfield site for one of the lots. Originally the applicant hoped to lease land required to provide a location for the alternate drainfield site. Since that time, there has been a second option available which would involve purchasing land from another adjacent property owner. Staff would prefer to have the applicant acquire adjacent land. Councilmember Goetten concurred with staff that a lease arrangement would not be appropriate for a number of reasons, mainly because of the risk of the alternate site being destroyed, and the precedent setting potential. Mayor Grabek also agreed that it would be best to direct the applicant to proceed with the application provided that she purchase the necessary land for the alternate drainfield site. HAUSER/LAVER WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB BASEMENT APPEAL Mr. and Mrs. Hauser, Mr. Jack Taylor, attorney for the Hausers, and Ms. Meredith Howell the Hauser's Real Estate Agent were present. Mr. Ron Lauer and John Downey were also present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson provided a brief history of this application and explained the problem that now exists with 13 MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MMTING HELD OCTOBER 23, 1989 BAUSER/LAVER WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB CONTINUED finalizing the subdivision. He said that there is a problem with the Country Club providing the City with the easement for a future roadway as required in the Resolution giving Final Plat Approval. The City is recommending that an agreement be entered into with the Hausers and the Country Club that would deed to the City the outlots free of charge. The Cii-v would agree that the centerline of the road would be at the north property line and would provide a 4 to 6 month notice prior to the development of the road. The City would also agree to tu-n back to the property owners any portion of the right-of-way that is not used for street services. City Attorney Barrett elaborated on the proposal and the reason that it would be best for the City to obtain fee title to the property needed for the road. Barrett_ informed the Council and Mayor Grabek that the The Wayzata Country Club Board chcoses not to give the City fee title. Mayor Grabek asked Mr. Downey what the Country Club was proposing to solve this dilemma? Downey said that the City's proposal had changed since the Bu"rd voted. He said that the actual giving of the land was different than just giving an easement. Ms. Helen Hauser explained that the property owners to the south of the road were being asked to give up property and her property will never use the road. Mrs. Hauser said that she and her husband were being "held hostage" to this agreement. Mrs. Hauser said that she and her husband did not find out there was a problem until they came into the City offices to apply for a building permit. She informed the Counc.,l that their home was sold --n the 28th of July and the purchaser of the property was pressing them for a moving date. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the K,4users had chost n not to hire an attorney to represent them w_ h the subidivision. He said that when this easement issue with the Country Club became known, the City dealt with the attorney for the Country Club. Bernhardson said that the City may have inappropriately assumed that the Country Club's attorneys were keeping the Hausers abreast of the situation since they were co - developers. Mr. Hauser 1,-.erjected that as of today's mail they did not receive notice of this matter being on the agenda for this meeting. Bernhardson replied that the Country Club had asked to be placed on the agenda two weeks ago when it was discovered that there would be a problem with the granting of the easement. Councilmember Goetten said that the City asked the Hausers to join in the subdivision of the Country Club. She felt 14 MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 23, 1989 HAUSER/LAVER WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB CONTINUED th-refore, that the City had a responsibility to at least inform the Hausers of the situation. She said that the Hausers are owed an apology. Councilmember Nettles asked whether it would be possible to simply add the City of Orono's name to the deed with the agreement that at such time that it can be established that there is no problem with exclusive rights the City would deed title back. City Attorney Barrett replied that he could not answer without further review. Mrs. Hauser questioned when this problem surfaced? City Attorney Barrett said that he began receiving correspondence from Mr. Lauer's attorney in September asking the City to waive the requirement of the easement being provided. Mayor Grabek asked how to proceed from this point to eliminate the possibility of delaying the Hauser's construction while reaching a mutually satisfactory resolve with the Country Club? Mr. Taylor asked what more the Country Club and the Hauser's could give the City other than the right for the public to use the road. He said that if the City does have to use the road and muse, condemn certain rights to do so, the Hauser's have already given what they can. He said that he did not understand what more the City wanted? City Attorney Barrett said that the City wanted a clear easement. Barrett said that more than likely the other existing rights to the easement were probably not very valuable, however, extinguishing those existing rights could be very costly. Councilmember Callahan questioned whether it would be possible to obtain a Quit Claim Deed from the Hausers and allow them to Frc-:eed and deal with the Country Club separately? Barrett answered affirmatively. Mr. Hauser noted that as a part of the subdivision, the Hausers agreed to trade off 50' of their property for the outlot a.,7cessing Ferndale Road. He questioned whether proceeding separately would affect that trade off. Lornhardson said that one possibility would be to have the Hausers 7o back and proceed with the subdivision separately. He a id that they could appear at the November 20, 1989 Planning Commission meeting and then proceed to the Council meeting on November 27Lh. He said that the portion of the property to be traded to t`e-ountry Club could be platted as a separate outlot. 15 MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 23, 1989 HAUSER/LAUER WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB CONTINUED Mayor Grabek asked what additional cost this would be to the Hausers. Bernhardson said that he could not make any estimation. Mr. Thomas Dufrain, the future -,Yner of the Hauser's house, said that the buyers of his home were anxious to move. He asked Barrett why the Hausers and Country Club could not enter into an agreement with the City that would provide the City with the easement at the Lime it proves to be needed. Barrett replied that the Hausers and Country Club could not give what they did not have. Bernhardson noted that had the Hausers proceeded separately from the very beginning, this problem would still have surfaced. He said that in a normal subdivision with a public roPd, the City would have taken fee title of the property in question right away. Bernhardson said that it would be difficult to condemn property from the other owners at some future time. Mr. Dufrain felt that the City was using this subdivision as an opportunity to plat a road even though the property being subdivided did not benefit from the road. Mrs. Hauser asked what the required width of the road would be at such time that it is developed. City Engineer Cook replied that it would be 24' if constructed as a rural section, 28' if urban. Mrs. Hauser suggested that the City should condemn the property needed from the other property owners north and south of the road at such time that the road is to be developed. She said that it was not fair to delay them any further. Councilmember Goetten asked Bernhardson what needed to be done in order for the Hausers to be able to begin building their new home? Bernhardson noted that the City was expecting the property owners to give the City a full and clear easement as part of the final plat approval. He said that is something that is expected from other subdivisions and normally it is not a problem. He said that the solution to this problem would be salved if the property owners are willing to give the City an agreement to fee title in the future. He said the only other way to assist the Hausers would be to have them file their subdivision separately. Mr. Taylor said that this particular subdivision is not generating the need for the road that the City is attempting to plat. He questioned whether the City is entitled to obtain this type of easement from the Hausers and :.he Country Club? 16 MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 23, 1989 HAGSRV/LRUER WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB CONTINUED Councilmember Callahan said that the Hausers in fact have not done everything they were supposed to do. Even though they are not reluctant to provide the easement, they have not done so. Callahan noted that it would make no difference to the Hausers whether the 25' is given in the form of an easement or taken in condemnation. He said that the question that needs to be addressed is whether the City is willing to forego its normal expectations and simply take easements. City Attorney Barrett said that there would be no legal impediment to the City taking less than what it normally takes. He said that the two questions involved would be as a policy matter does the City want to take less than normal, and from a financial standpoint, who would pay for the process of extinguishing the other rights to the easement or condemnation. City Administrator Bernhardson informed the Council that the applicants were "in the driver seat" as to whether this issue can be resolved quickly or not. if the Council requests fee title then whether the process stops or not is up to the persons proposing the development. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to require fee title from both the Hausers and the Wayzata Country Club. Councilmember Goetten questioned whether it had to be done in combination or could be done separately. Mayor Grabek replied that it could be done separately. Motion, Ayes-3, Councilmembers Goetten and Peterson asked for more time to consider their vote. Councilmember Callahan questioned what time frame would be involved with the motion? Gaffron advised that it will be necessary for the Hausers to have new mylars prepared if they are going to proceed separately. Mayor Grabek asked what the proper procedure would be if a Councilmember wished to change his/her vote in light of the fact that 2 of the Councilmembers had not yet voted? Councilmember Callahan said the` `tie Council would need to make a motion to have the matter rec:, _dered. Mayor Grabek said that he was compelled to follow the suggestions of the City Attorney as to the best way to proceed and therefore preferred not to reconsider his motion. However, he did want to do whatever he could to minimize any hardship for the Hausers. Councilmembers Goetten and Peterson voted in favor, bringing the total vote to Ayes-5, Nays=O, Motion passed. COUNTY ROAD 116 RESOLUTION #2723 Mr. Bruce rolaczyk of Hez.nepin County was present for the review of this item. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that at the last Council meeting a public hearing was held regarding this matter and there were two questions that remained unresolved. One question was where the $65,000.00 estimated cost for the project would come? The $65,000.00 would come from M.S.A. funds in the City's capital budget and would be a substitute for the eventual 17 MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 23, 1989 COUNTY ROAD 116 RESOLUTION CONTINUED $310,000.00 expenditure projected for 1995. The other question is what is the source of the increased future traffic used in the Ccunty's statistics for warranting the road. Bernhardson said that it is his understanding that the increase would come solely from growth, not from existing traffic currently using other roads. Bernhardson said that the resolution being presented this evening indicates to Hennepin County that the City of Orono is opposed to County Road 116. However, if the project is going ahead to the Medina/Orono border, and provided that preliminary design approval is given with the agreement that County Road 116 extend no further south than Highway 12, the City of Orono will allow the road to be constructed to that point. Mr. Cliff Hillstrom, 1160 Willow Drive, was concerned about the proposed berm that would placed near his home. He said that there is quite a bit of runoff in the spring resulting from the open fields near his home. He questioned whether the berm would cause the water to hack up. Public Works Director Gerhardscn advised Mr. Hillstrom that the only berm being proposed is the b" curbing for the road. Mr. Hillstrom asked whether the existing draintile would be disturbed as a result of this project? Gerhardson said that the draintile should remain as is and that he would be reviewing that issue more closely oefore the final design is approved. Ms. Roseanne Eppel, a Medina resident, referenced a letter she had recently written tQ, the City. Ms. Eppel said that Orono Council ought to order a speed survey for that section of roadway. She felt that 45 mph was too fast for that road. She also questioned whether there will be a traffic light at the intersection of Highway 12 and Willow. She was concerned about the residents being properly informed of where the construction limit would be it relation to the properties. Ms. Eppel said that she was also concerned about the drainage. There was a discussion between Mr. Denis Battrum and Mr. Polaczyk as to whether Hennepin County had received preliminary design approval from the City of Medina. Mr. Polaczyk said t.tat .n May of 1987, Medina approved the preliminary plan. Mr. Battrum said that he had the environmental assessment worksheet from Hennepin County which stated that approval after preliminary plan is pending. Mr. Battrum questioned the reliability of the estimate of the traffic count. He felt that the existing road would be wide enough to handle what traffic is supposed to be in the year 2000. He thought that the estimate of the right-of-way costs to the City of Orono is inadequate. He questioned whether Hennepin County may actually maintain that portion of the road once construction is completed. 18 MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 23, 1989 COUNTY ROP►D 116 RESOLUTION CONTINUED Mayor Grabek suggested that Mr. Battrum contact Mr. Gerhardson to have his concerns properly addressed. He also suggested providing Mr. Battrum with a copy of the Medina resolution approving the preliminary plan. Ms. Barbara Hite, 2475 Countryside Drive, believed that opposition to County Road 116 had grown since July of 1987 even though there were not masses of people present to voice that opinion. She said that she too was concerned about whether or not Medina had completed a final resolution for County Road 116 and what impact the road would have on the recidents. She said that she was concerned about Councilmembers apprcving a resolution when there were still so many unanswered questions. She said that she would feel better if she had some direct answers to those questions. Mayor Grabek assured Ms. Hite that the City and Council will make sure that all of the pertinent questicns are answered prior to approval being given to proceed. He also suggested that Ms. cite contact the Public Works Department to receive direct answers to her questions about costs, traffic counts, etc. Ms. Hite said that she does not understand how the Council on one hand can indicate that they are opposed to County Road 116, and yet pass a resolution giving preliminary approval. Mayor Grabek said that ne could understand how Ms. Hite could feel that way, but that there many aspects of this issue. Mayor Grabek said that the economic we?-,. being of the entire City had to be considered as did the aspect of traffic flows. Mr. Battrum questioned the need to upgrade the road at all. He said that he did not feel he was getting "neutral answers to his questions" for City staff in this regard. Mayor Grabek said that the Orono portion of 116 must be upgraded in the near future. If the County doe-, not pay for the project, the amount of the project will have to be assessed to the Citizens of Orono. Mr. Robbin Sentell questioned whether the Council feels it has any leverage with the County on traffic regulations at either of the intersections involved. He said that the citizens of Orono may be less fearful of the upgrade if they were assured that certain types of traf f is regulations were going to be put in place. Mr. Polaczyk said that the County does not set speed limits, the Commissioner of Transportation has that responsibility. Mayor Grabek asked if there was anything that tt,e City could do to have the speed limit reduced? Mr. Polaczyk said that the speed study could be done, but 19 MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 23, 1989 COUNTY ROAD 116 RESOLUTION CONTINUED that oncE the study is done there is a possiblity that the study would result in the speed being raised as well as lowered. Mayor Grabek then addressed the issue of the warrant for a stoplight at the intersection of Willow and Highway 12. He said that if there are only so many funds in the State available for stoplights, trey must be put where they are most needed. Councilmember Goetten said that she has been doing everything poss4_ble to have a light put at that intersection and would ccntinue to do so. Ms. Hite said that she would like to see the Council be stronger in their opposition to County Road 116. She also questioned why the County Road 116 project went from a low priority to top priority in such a short time? Mr. Polaczyk said that this project was initiated by Hennepin County in 1977 and the reason that it did not have high priority because there was no funding source available. The funding source is now available. The preliminary approval given by Medina has authorized the County to go ahead. Mr. Polaczyk said that the priorities change frequently and rapidly. He said that his department just makes recommendations as to what projects need to be done. Councilmember Callahan reminded the Council that they had asked the County to meet with those persons who were in need of information as to how the project would affect their individual property. Public Works Director said that ne would like to have those persons call the City Hall and talk with him rather "_han call the County. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution. #2723, approving the preliminary design for County Road 116 as stated in paragraphs A, B, and C. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=O, Motion passed. CHRISTMAS LIGHTING - NAVARRE AREA City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the City of Mound and Spring Park are considering Christmas decorations for the street lights. The City of Spring Park has asked the City of Orono whetter they would participate. Bernhardson said that he had several concerns, one of which is the lack of equipment to put the decorations up and take them down. Other concerns include st,)rage of the decorations and the source from which payment for the electricty would come. Councilmember Goetten indicated that she would like to see some pictures of the decorations that would be used. Mayor Grabek directed staff to compile information regarding 20 MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 23, 1989 CHRISTMAS LIGHTING NAVARRE CONTINUED the time period and overall cost of this proposal and bring that information back for the Council to consider. STUBBS BAY - REVIEW OF ISSUES It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by Mayor Grabek, to table this item. Motion, Ayes-5, Nays=0, Motion passed. ACCESSORY STRUCTURE ORDINAUCE City Administrator Bernhardson asked the Council and Mayor Grabek whether they would like to have City staff begin work on an ordinance amendment regulating swimming pools. The Council and Mayor Grabek indicated that the City should proceed with such an amendment. PRIVATE/PUBLIC ROAD EXTENSION City Administrator Bernhardson explained t—it c dc-r-:cper wished to subdivide property north of Wear Lane. ti.:,-:ess tc, the newly subdivided property has been an issue for some t nir. Rernhardson said that the City could extend the existing privzte road and designate a public road that would be privatrvly maintained. Bernhardson said that h- would recommend that the applicant work with the Homeowner's Association to see if the extension is agreeable. The Council and Mayer Grabek indicated that the} agreed with his recommendation. NAVARRE REDEVELOPMENT CONSULTANT CONTRACT City Administrator Bernhardson explained that there was a need for an additional $5,000.00 for the Cons+i 1ting fee for the Navarre Redevelopment. Mayor Grabek belie7red that c.eveloping a plan for Navarre was necessary, even if the City did not implement it, it would provide some basis and guidelines for the deveiopei. Councilmember Goetten indicated that Mr. Shardlow had done a very good job with this project and she would like to see his work continue. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, secondeJ by Mayor Grabek, to authorize amending of the agreement with Dahlgren, Shardlow and Uban regarding Navarre Redevelopment to include an additional $5,000.00 for beginning Stage II work. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=O, Motion passed. LIEUTENANT SELECTION PROCESS Mayor Grabek said that he preferred to see management determine the selection process, rather than the Council becoming involved with discussions for an alternative process. 21 MINUTES '! ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOPER 23, 1989 LIEUTENANT SELECTION PROCESS CONTINUED Councilmember C)etten asked how long the probation period is for the second of the three lieutenants. Chief Kilbo said that the probaclua period would end approximately March 13, 1990. Councilmember Goetten asked to be updated as to the progress of the second lieutenant position. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, secondpe by Councilmember Nettles, to accept the information presr-it-2d regarding the seclection process. Motion, Ayes-5, Nays=0, Motion passed. PLANNING COMMISSION/COUNCIL FACILITIbZ MERTING* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Counc xember Goetten, to set November 8, 1989 as a date for the joint meeting of the Council/Planning Commission for consideration of the City facilities. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays-n, Motion passed. NAVARRE REDEVELOPMBNT MBETING* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Ccuncilmember Goetten, to accept the information regarding the Navarre Redevelopment Meeting. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=0, Motion passed. STREET LIGSTING ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION #2724* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2724, adopting the Supplemental Street Lighting Impro✓ement Assessments on County Road 15. 'notion, Ayes-5, Nays=6, Motion passed. EMPLOYMENT - BUILDING INSPECTOR* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to concur in the appointment of Lyle Oman to the position of Senior Building Inspector at Level 9, Step 2+, at a rate of $14.77 ari hour ($30,720 annual), and also that the Council approve t_`_: employment of Bru--e Vang for the position of Building Inspector at $12.98 ar hogs ($27,000 annual) with a review to be conducted of both at 5 months predicated on performance. Motion, Ayes=5, Nay:=0, Motion passed. ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR SALARY REVIEW* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adjust Assistant Finance Direr',;.,,. Linda Walters' hourly wage rate from Level 5, Step I ($10.056) to Level 5, Step II ($10.647) effective October 2, 19,39. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=0, Motion passed. 22 MINUTES OF COUNCIL bXETING HELD OCTOBER 23, 1989 ANN POLICY A034—TION MEETING* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seccnded by Councilmember Goetten, to acknowledge receipt of the policies together with any comments they Pay have on the policies. Mt,tion, Ayes=5, Nays=O, Motion passed. HIGHWAY 12 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Counc:ilL,ember GoE:.ten, to table further discussion on this awaiting word from Long Lake on th project but City staff and the City Engineer work together to develop the feasibility study and layouts to begin discussion with appropriate property owners for the frontage roads. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=O, Motion passed. AUDITOR LPPOINTMENT 1989* It aas moved by Mayo- Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, tc: appoint the auuit firm of Pannell Kerz Forster to perform the require,-! audits for the 1989 fiscal year -.,t an estimated cost of $14,750 plus direct expenses. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=0, Motion passed. SALE OF CITY PROPERTY* This item was previously removed from the agenda. 1990-2000 CAPITAL BUDGET UPDATE* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to table this matter for further discussion in the 1990 budget process. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=O, Motion passed. SITE APPRAISAL* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to authorize the expenditures of up to $2,000.00 fo appraisal of value on Site C. from the Building Fund. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=O, Motion passed. ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION* It was moved by Mayor Grabek; seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to accept the City Administrator's Information regarding: Recycling Results; Summary of Receipts & Disbursements -August; Electronic Funds; Goal Setting Status. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=0, Motion passed. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: City Attorney Barrett requested an Executive Session. LICENSES Councilmember Goetten expressed her concern about the use of leghold traps for controlling beavers that are causing damage to trees located near the lakeshore. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to approve the following licenses: i 23 MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 23, 1989 Septic System Installer: Duane Ritter Excavating 7120 Vernon Street Rockford, MN Gambling Licen3e: Lions Club Mound Northwest Tonka Sell Pull tabs at: Navarre Lanes 3435 Shoreline Drive Trapping Permit: Michael & Sally Bosanko 2090 Shoreline Drive Motion, Ayes=4, Goett:en, Nay, Motion passed. BILLS* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve payment of the All Funds Accounts. Motion, Ayes-5, Nays-0, Motion passed. EXECUTIVE SESSION - .10:40 P.M. Mayor Grabek requested that the Council go into an executive session at 10:40 p.m. ADJOURNMENT 11:00 P.M. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to adjourn the Regular Council Meeting at 11:00 p.m. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=0, Motion passed. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Ha lin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr. Actiz.g Mayor 24 COUNCIL MEETM16 To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members NOV 3 Planning Commission Chairman Kelley 1389 Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson CITY OF ORONO From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: June 13, 1989 Subject: #1413 Daniel A. Hoffman, 1135 & 1155 Heritage Lane - Subdivision of Lot Line Rearrangement - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-lA, unsewered Required Area - 2 acres Current Lot 1 = 45,201 s.f. or 1.03 acres Proposed = 47,896 s.f. or 1.09 acres Current Lot 2 = 46,162 s.f. or 1.05 acres Proposed = 43,468 s.f. or .99 acres Pertinent Ordinance - Section 11.03, Definition 65 (C) - Subdivision application required because lots involved in lot line rearrangement do not meet area standard of 2 acres. Section 11.03, Definition 66 - Subdivision of a lot line rearrangement to be a I' ss I metes and bounds division. The purpose of the di � -ion is to create a lot line '.'.:at more clearly reflects existing improvements and defined yard areas for each property. The subdivision does not involve the creation of a new residential lot. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit P - Property Owners List Exhibit - Plat Map Exhibit D - Schirmers' Report 4/19/89 Exhibit E - Septic Test Mapping Exhibit F - Survey of Lot Line Rearrangement Review of Current Application - Mr. Hoffman, the applicant, was requircl to submit additional septic testing for his neighbor's property to the immediate south in order to confirm for the City that the transfer of the lands along the northeast boundary of Lot 2 will not place undue restrictions if septic expansion is needed at some time in the future. Mr. Schirmers' report and septic map (Exhibits D & E) confirm that there is adequate area for an alternate septic site to the north of the existing house. Zoning File #1413 June 13, 1989 Page 2 of 2 Note that the proposed septic system (four bedroom capacity) will be at 24' from the newly defined lot line (code requires 20'). All neighboring wells meet the required setback distance from the proposed alternate septic area (759- As with all lot line rearrrangements that are presented in a metes and bounds format, approval must be conditioned on the combination of Parcel A with Lot 1 to the north. The current and future owner of proposed Parcel B is to be advised of the need to protect the future alternate septic site on the property and to keep all heavy equipment and fill away from the test area since there is no additional land available within the Fox Hill plat. If Planning Commission chooses to deny the proposed subdivision, please refer to the necessary findings in Section 11.02, Subdivision 10. Zoning File #1413 - Daniel A. Hoffman 1135/1155 Heritage Lane Continuation of Staff Memo November 8, 1989 Page Three Additional Exhibits - Exhibit G - Planning Commission Minutes of June 19, 1989 Exhibit H - Final Subdivision Plan for Filing Additional Comments and Planning Commission Recommendation - The P. '�ci Commission recommended unanimous approval of the proposea subdivision of a lot line rearrangement and vacation of the utility easement 20' in length at the northeast corner of Lot 2 (refer to Exhibit F for location of that easement). The applicant has rededicated drainage and utility easements for the 115' of the new division line. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission's approval recommendation and includes the following conditions: 1. The legal combination of parcels A and B. 2. Owner of Lot 2, Block 3, Foxhill as amended by this subdivision is hereby advised of the need to protect the septic test site area to the north of the existing residence and to protect the area from the use of heavy equipment. 3. Applicants to deed drainage and utility easements along portion of new shared lot line for a distance of 115.15'. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 1135 AND 1155 HERITAGE LANE FILE NO. 1413 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "City Council") has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement by Daniel A. Hoffman, and Jorgen Viltoft (hereinafter "the subdividers") of properties legally described as follows: Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 3, Foxhill, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"), and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the City for metes and bounds subdivision for division and combinati, purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Concil of the City of Orono hereby approves the metes and bounds division of a lot line rearrangement for Daniel A. Hoffman and Jorgen Viltoft as shown on the Certificate of Survey by Paul A. Johnson of McCombs, Frank, Roos Associates, Inc. dated May 15, 1989, revised June 29, 1989 and attached to this resolution, subject to the following conditions: Page 1 of 3 1. Upon approval of this subdivision by the City Council of Orono, Daniel A. Hoffman must apply to the City for legal combination for tax purposes of the following properties as described in the above -referenced survey of the meteF and bounds division of a lot line rearrangement: Parcel A to be combined with Parcel B 2. The owner of Parcel C as described in the above - referenced survey attached to this resolution is hereby advised of the need to protect the alternate septic test site area to the north of the existing residence by restricting the use of heavy equipment over the subject area. 3. The subdividers shall deed drainage and utility easements to the City along that portion of the new division line for a distance of 115.15'. 4. The aforesaid division a.- shown on the attached Certificate of Survey shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin Coun•.:y Recorder's office or Registrar of Title Office on or before May 13, 1990 together with a certified original copy of this resolution and any other covenants and easements required by this subdivision approval. The approval gr=nted by this Resolution ,-zhall expire if the division has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Page 2 of 3 W Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota, this 13th day of November, 1989. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) Edward J. Callahan, Jr. Acting Mayor The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of November, 1989, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. a Dorothy M. Hallin, Acting Mayor and City Clerk of the C11-y of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrt.:,„ent was executed on behalf of the City. Notary public My Commission Expires Page 3 of 3 A RESOLUTION VACATING A UTILITY EASEMM WITHIN LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 3, FOX HILL SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 117, RANGE 23 IN THE CITY OF ORONO, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA FILE NO. 1413 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, on May 24, 1989, Daniel A. Hoffman and Jorgen Viltoft filed a petition with the City of Orono requesting the vacation of a utility easement orgina l ly dedicated within the plat of Foxhill anq legally described as follows: A utility easement, being 5' on each side of the lot line between Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Foxhill, according to the recorded --lat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota and runs L-ni the easterly line of said Lots 1 and 2, a distance of 20 feet westerly. WHEREAS, after due published and posted notice, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on June 19, 1989 regarding said vacation and all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after due standing and consideration, the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the requested vacation and this Council of the City of Orono finds that said vacation as proposed is in keeping with the public interests and in consideration of the following findings: 1. The 20 feet length portion of the utility easement serves no public purpose. 2. The location of the utility easement within Lot 1, Block 3, Foxhill, as amended by a recent subdivision of a lot line rearrangement finds the above -described utility easement to place severe restrictions on the building envelope. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the petition of Daniel A. Hoffman and Jorgen Viltoft is hereby granted by the Council of the City of Orono and that the portion of the dedicated utility easement legally described above is hereby vacated. Page 1 of 2 /03 Receiat - r• CITY Ok RON7 - SUBDIVISION ICAT PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address / / �7 �-1 /1 r r I. ��i A� L Y, • . L V-1 /-1LL , •L L' •r•�,1• LJI�. YY Property Identification Number ( P . I . D . ) / d - / / 7 - �3 - /-3 p v ► ) J L. • Please check one - Property t/ abstract or torrens7 Attach legal description to application. ----------------------------------------------------------1-- ----------- "PLICAPT Phone (home) Name Del Phone (work) Address: /l3s NeNI'�aae L-h_ City: . n �H • Zip: SS �C1 1 ---------------------------- --------------------------------------------- OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) q 7 3-- Q 6 J Name T4Y� V, • / Phone (work) Address: He r,' �-a 4 e City: 41 rO*To Zip: (attach list if more than one) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- EXISTING LAND USE Number o:' Tax Parcels Development Size Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check) ✓ Residential; no. of units Other (specify) Present Zoning District ----------------------------------------------•----------------------------- PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: Existing Units _ New Units Total Un.Its Proposed Gross Density: Units per Acres Minimum Lot Size: Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check) Residential Other (specify) MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Completed Application Form 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271;. 4. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). 5. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature Date ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water aasessments). 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Rpplication is complete. Zoning Official's Signature Date --------------------------------------------------------------------------- FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) $150.00 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) 250.00'� Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) 300.00 + 20.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) 150.00* *(Plus any 1E3al or engineering charges) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into he City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Mee ing. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third monday of each month. Anplicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. RUN DATE 05/19/89 - BATCH 004 38 10-117-23 11 0002 PROP ADDR OOD38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED OWNER NAME MCLEOD CNTY REG RAIL AUTH TAXPAYER DAKOTA RAIL INC NAME/ADDR C/O THOMAS LOVETT r 1400 FIRST BANK PLACE N MPLS MN 55402 38 10-117-23 13 0004 PROP ADDR 01150 HERITAGE LA OWNER NAME A A NICKLOW A V C NICKLON TAXPAYER A A A V C NICKLOW NAME/ADDR 1150 HERITAGF WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 13 0010 PROP ADDR 01085 HERITAGE LA OWNER NAMc JAMES A SNYDER ETA' - TAXPAYER JAMES A S.4YDE:'. NAME/ADDR 1685 HERITAGE LANE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 13 0013 PROP ADDR 019DS HERITAGE OR OWNER NAME SHERMAN S SMITH ETAL TAXPAYER '-HERMAN S SMITH NAME/ADDR 905 HERITAGE DRIVE KAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-127-23 13 0018 PROP ADDR 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED OWNER NAME DAVID M HINTON TAXPAYER DAVID M HINTON NAME/ADDR 4422 IDS CENTER 80 S 8TH ST MPLS MN 55402 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH 004 00015 NAME/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 10-117-23 13 0002 01180 HERITAGE LA LOWELL J JANKE ETAL LOWELL J JANKE 1180 HERITAGE LA WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 13 0005 01100 HERITAGE LA KURT E RFTZ!.ER ETAL KURT E RETZLER 1100 HERITAGE LANE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 13 0011 01135 HERITAGE LA D A HOFFMAN A B J HOFFMAN 0 A HOFFMAN A B J HOFFMAN 1135 HERITAGE LANE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 13 0016 01105 HERITAGE LA FOXHILL ASSN FOXHILL ASSN 1160 HERITAGE LA WAYZATA HN 55391 38 10-117-23 13 0019 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HELEN S MCKNIGHT DAVID M WINTON 4422 IDS CENTER 80 S 8TH ST MPLS MN SS402 REPCRT NO. PI435401 PAGE 10 J 38 10-117-23 13 0003 01160 HERITAGE LA 1 R A J ZITZLOFF RAY ZITZLOFF 1160 HERITAGE LANE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 13 0006 01090 HERITAGE LA DAVID M 14INTON DAVID M HINTON 4422 IDS CENTER 80 S 8TH ST MPLS MN 55402 38 10-117-23 13 0012 01155 HERITAGE LA `r JORGEN VILTOFT ETAL JORG':N A LUCILLE A VILTOFT 1155 HERITAGE LANE WAYZATA IN 55391 38 10-117-23 13 0017 4 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED DAVID M HINTON-� DAVID M HINTON 4422 IDS CENTER 80 S 8TH ST MPLS MN 55402 38 10-117-23 42 0002 01830 SHORELINE OR A L ANDERSON i H M ANDERSON AS , ALDEN L A HELEN M ANDERSON 1830 SHORELINE DRIVE WAYZATA M 55391 `_ 11+� .y 'i y'h m RUN DATE 05/19/f , BATCH 004 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFOR'ATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 11 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPE iY T TION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. , DATE BY 'fi C :A ALP 2 4 _ y,1ii j 1 it07 CIS `•� '��L`aa << 4 l �� `-' �Pr 071 L /o et t5; .11 '? �l u:s v ' t 8 y; 51 of ' - Vim. h _` '��•' ';'•• ` 14 Lm Ul r Z: /}`l a (11� . ='I "� Z� :.. �.. ot, cr Lqf` ,� c I S•1 x (IL) \ ,1 I I 1-^'�-+�6' .� 1 1 LOW NET p � •°~ 2 vt�',•�r W .. . YI li• -I AER• PHOTO 1 ASpfli { U-•: gat 7l .L •J� •_w•rf1114, r. 4llJM;ll,,�++-�^•t� 7:r�' e. ,. �• s�aft.S 2 .. r (214 tip, � C �;,...� • ," • ,'�• , � � � � , _ _ _ _ i===_ ol jis e .lLl �` ,\ �O •�* ' �.� _yC �(1, /:µ /a1.V_y�i .:�. .-',""" .�-�- —'� �� "•"tT. i1.2 �a \,� � � 'S4~`� \� �J. (L� , d � � l l lt•l� • �'% i• '`�,.1t: �' - L • ITA. 1 5 156. \No. 96 g !� c 16 / rJ vT `'T4 � - � . . ✓. H J ti Dan Hoffman Lot 2, Block Foxhill Orono, Henn. E Co., MN 951 KATYD!D :ANc, ST. M!Ct:Ac! , .V.N 55375 497-3563 = •- $'-even 3. Schirme�w;� April 19, 1989 A site evaluation was completed for a Future expansion area for a Sub -Division. This system is Designed for a Type 1, four bedro --me and in accordance with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Chap 7080 and local ordinances. The soils on this site are typical of SCE soils Tapped - HeB - Heyder sandy loam. A seasonally high water table was located at 60" & 64", (mottled soil). ".he bottom of each trench must be located at '_east 3' above the seasonally high water table. The existing system is located west of the house. The soil west of the existing system are fill soils and are not adequate for expanding the existing system. The flow line from the 2nd tan;. is approx. 42" below the ground surface & is too deep for a gravity :.ystem. The area north of the house is adequate for a standard treatment system. The soils at a depth of 24" have a percolation rate aver:tng 4.1 loin/inch. Each trench will need to be over excavated a minimum of 12" and be replaced with uncompacted loamy sand. This liner is -needed to .;low the effluent down for treatment. If. :rop boxes are used with a minimum of 4 trencht-. this liner is not needed. A pumping chamber will need to be installed to lift the effluent to the treatment area. The power supply and switches must be located outside the manhole and pumping chamber in a weather proof enclosure. A warning device mist be installed with a light and sound device, this is in case of a pump failure. (Mercury floats.are a good method). The supply line pipe must nave back drainage to the pumping chamber. All neighboring wells are located more than 100' away from the proposed treatment area. ' CONT'D Soil and Percolation Text - Septic System Design Keep all heavy equipment off of the proposed treatment area before and after construction as much as possible. The treatment area should be marked off before construction. With proper insta:ration and maintenance, this system should have no problem in treating septic effluent -�f�,mctively. Recommend to pump the septic tank every year '_` there is only 1 tank & every 2 years if there are 2 tanks. SLe.�— Stever. B. Schirmer-, ds' SBS/ds J Al 84 = p I >< o (L i y �n f N . L 4 4 1 Tr1 I I�y i V F 1 P4.�JX i I nJ ! , o ti a �l v t�4 7j 1 tr EXHIBIT F M I N N E SOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOU%DED In 1849 Fort Snelling Hivon Center, 5t. Paul. MN 55111 • (612) 72fr1171 April 4, 1989 Mr. Bruce M. Polaczyk, P.E. Department of Public Works 320 Spa: Angton Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-.468 Dear Mr. Polaczyk: Re: County Project 7735; Extend CSAH 116 from T.H. 55 to T.H. 12 t:edina and Orono, Hennepin County MHS Referral File Number: 89-1263 Thank you for the opportLnity to review and comment on the above project. It has been reviewed pursuant to responsibilities given the State Historic Preservation Officer by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1366 and the Procedures of the National Adh:isory Council on Historic Preservation. (36CFR800). T reviev, reveals the location of no recorded sites of historic, architectural, cultural, or engineering significance within the area of the proposed project. Although there are no kne,. archaeological sites in the proposed project area, there is reascn to believe that such sites may exist. It is our understanding that the area is scheduled to be surveyed by the Municipal and County Highway Archaeologist, Ecott Anfinson, in the coming field season. Therefore, we withhold our final comment until the results of the survey are reviewed. Please send Mr. Anfinson a set of detailed plans for the proposed undertaking. Thank you for your continued close attention to historic and prehistoric v?!"ts in your planning process. Sincerelv, Dennis A. Gimmestad Deputy Sate Historic Preservation Officer DAG : d.:,b cc: Scott Anfinson, County -Municipal Hia,!%1ay Archaeologist Fort Snelling History Center, St. Paul, Mt: 55111 Clem Kachel.myer, Preliminary Design Engineer, MnDOrA? 612H Transportation Building, St. Paul, MN 55155�r!!ti F� jv NNSF I'_ EXHIBIT G NOISE STUDY 1 PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS Traffic noise levels for the 47 sites shown on the noise map were predicted using the *Stamina 2.0/Optima Computer Program". Peak traffic noise levels were computed for the year 2000, ten years after proposed construction of CR 116. These levels were based on projected traffic volumes supplied by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. The following table summarizes the predicted noise level at each of the 47 sites. These 47 sites represent residences adjoining the proposed -'R 116 alignment. DISTANCE (IN FT.) YEAR 2000 L10 YEAR 2000 L50 SITE HOUSE FROM CR 116 DAYTIME NOISE DAYTIME NOISE RECEPTOR (STATION) NUMBER CENTERLINE LEVEL (dBA) LEVEL (dBA) 1 242+00 900 105 62 53 2 244+50 960 200 58 50 3 249+50 1020 150 61 52 4 256+50 1125 100 63 54 5 257+50 1160 50 68• 58 6 258+60 1180 125 62 53 7 262+50 1255 72 65 56 8 267+00 1285 88 64 55 9 268+60 2422 87 64 55 10 270+00 2462 135 61 53 11 271+00 2466 135 61 53 12 277+50 1462 160 60 52 13 278+50 1475 200 59 51 14 283+70 1532 183 60 51 15 285+00 GARAGE 90 64 55 16 295+55 1715 170 60 52 17 298+40 1765 290 56 49 18 309+50 1922 150 61 53 19 317+90 2020 430 54 48 20 320+70 2235 330 56 49 21 327+50 2232 353 53 46 22 330+50 2152 110 59 50 23 334+72 270 55 47 24 337+35 2120 310 54 46 25 348+00 1832 185 58 49 26 363+85 1735 255 56 48 27 365+80 1732 115 60 50 28 369+60 1682 165 5i 48 29 374+40 1582 330 54 46 30 379+62 1495 205 56 48 31 368+50 1392 240 56 47 32 398+00 1255 195 58 50 33 401+90 1182 190 59 51 34 411+60 1045 212 58 50 35 416+82 985 90 64 54 36 417+00 1072 320 96 49 37 461+80 600 56 49 38 465+00 580 32 46 39 467+70 370 55 48 40 484+60 8076 98 63 54 41 486+30 791-797 75 65 57 42 486+60 805 55 67' 57 43 487+90 812 78 65 55 2 DISTANCE (IN FT.) YEAR 2000 L10 YEAR 2000 L50 SITE HOUSE FROM CR 116 DAYTIME NOISE DAYTIME NOISE RECEPTOR (STATION) NUMBER CENTERLINE LEVEL (dBA) LEVEL dBA 44 488+00 3564 9L 64 5r 45 489+40 61 66* 56 46 490+00 3566-3568 100 63 54 47 490+60 3635 122 62 53 * Exceed 65 dBA. Definitions and Standards: The L10 reading is the sound level which is exceeded 10% of the time during the design hnur. L50 is the level which is exceeded 50% of the time. In this study, the design hour usea is the evening peak traffic hour. At other times during the day noise levels are reduced due to lower traffic volumes. Noise is measured in decibels adjusted to the human ear's sensitivity to different fre- quencies (abbreviated dBA). For residential areas, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) uses a standard of 70 dBA for L10 but has none for L50. The Minnesota Pollution Control agency (MPCA) uses a daytime standard of 65 dBA fir L10 and 60 SBA for L50. At none of the above sites will road noise exceed the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) standard of 70 dBA. None of the sites will be subjected to noise in excess of the MPCA L50 standard of 60 dBA. Three of the sites, however, will experience noise in excess of the MPCA L10 standard of 65 dBA. Site 5 will be 3dBA above, Site 42 will be 2 dBA above, and Site 45 will be 1 dBA above the MPCA standard. It is generally accepted among noise experts, including the MPCA, that while the human ear can detect a sudden change of as little as one dBA, a change of at least three or four dBA is needed to detect a difference over a long perioJ of time. Possible mitigation measures: 1. Alignment change. Unfortunately, any shift in horizontal alignment will merely move the source of the noise (road traffic) closer to other nearby houses. A significant shift in vertical alignment can't be accomplished because of the need to match inplace cross roads and driveways. 2. Earth berms. Six feet of horizontal distance is needed for every foot increase in height for earth berms (assumes 3:1 slopes on both sides). The three sites in question range from 50 feet to 61 feet from the center of the road. Subtracting 30 feet for the road and snow storage area leaves only 20 to 31 feet available for a berm. The maximum height would be under 6 feet which is not high enough to reduce noise below the 65 dBA level. 3. Noise walls. Reduction of noise to the 65 dBA level would require an 8 foot high wall between each site and the road. The walls would need to be 400 or more feet long and be continuous. Openings for driveways would destroy the noise reducing effect of the walls. Conclusions: None of the sites will have noise levels above the 70 dBA FHWA standard. Of the 47 sites along the road, none will exceed the MPCA L50 standard and only 3 will exceed the 65 dBA MPCA L10 standard, none of which will exceed it by more than 3dBA. Noise mitigation measures are not recommended. PB/DW;mak 09/29/89;PBNOISE 3 NOISE: SITES 7 n 6 C.S.A.H. 6 1 N T.H. NO. 12 2 i NOISE SITES 17-- -o DEER HILL MORNINGSIDE RD. - 8 .m 0 IN i � is ya O � oc • (I •� 3 t 0 J 1 N 421 "IO1SE SITES 24 21 2a NOISE SITES 33 ,A PROPOSED C.R. 116 29 TqM qR 4 cK ~` 32 �R =a 7 NORSE SITES NOISE SITES _ Q 1 _ O �► _ z .D d 47 48 45 43 44 HAMEL RD. 42 41 40 h 9 ` EXHIBIT H Transportation Analysis Pr . CSax 116 from TH 12 to Tt: 55 ovf-,f r� PREPARED BY ,Q THE MIN*NESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I PROGRAM MANAGEMENT DIVISION TRAFFIC FORECASTS SECTION OF TS09 1 Juoert ��i Lake •�fF! .� oe ,. CMtMLW� j; F - i 4 MORSCSMD[ TRAIL Marin� i � lit, �+a Lake c *0 1 • i CK►MORE RO..............................__:... ........... .,r: ......... 1 Rr.� '" -- ORETTO - Pi. 1= 1 ;:::,. tt G.FIP » ••1� I! I nc�anas MEDIINA ` l' r ��• " eti. Lake ro► 2622 �WjnrerhaIrer Spursern Lake Lake > Hamel =::: t, I I PLY: ro► 70r! r Nl1M:. 1 I: ': ROCKFORD I' c - it �I ``c 1 PROPOSED C.R. 116 —w i� Hal! Moor. School : -> c•..r•. �. c Holy Name :I Lake ��___ i ``yi ( 1 Thies o }.� �aice 6� !---� Lake I' .� =1 � Lake � �N. ooney kLake Dicl�ys� JIM assen L. It �. -Enna Lace0a ydfard :'�HadL e _ _ e Oti G LAKE, POP I7A7 s rs b Li � r Snyder r Lake2. s� H Z 101 s` � � M G/eason � _ ■uwY LAKE ^ f �. Op Minnesota Department c, Transportation Transportation Building, St. Faul, MN 55155 P. t* 1'111:• August 17, 1987 Bruce K. Polaczyk, P.E. Preliminary Design Engineer Hennepin County Department of Transportation 320 Washington Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 Dear Mr. Polaczyk: Phone 2 9 6 -- 0 217 Estimated 2010 2-wav Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes for c: oposed CSAH 116 f l or,, H 12 to TF S5 are attar I-- _ . In addition, "current" (1986 and 1967) 2-wa-, -7 's are Yreser.__d for comoa:ison. The projected volumes shown jr: tl�- report are Lased on the 2010/F2000 compl—e- traffic ass: .-..-n• and the "current" counts r,: esented in tr.is report. r_y be of furt r- assistance .ou r' contact me. Since`e:.y, Leo: =e N.. Ce=:ess state Tra:=:c Forecast r- A^ fwrol DOOOnWeu� EMPOO-r• 0 cl TMj: vl I C 11I yl I 1 CQ , Q I I 0 O'er ci i olc 0 a� s �I CI GA 1 f... � O�i✓11 A `rcO csomla - TN12 ToTNtj l f GEND — — - f&7u4f cv*srAvcrioA1 -0Do - 1911-97 7 wAy'Of icon - W-O/C 7 WAy'0f ESTiA,#rf 4 COUNCIL MEETING NOV 131989 To: From: Date: CITY OF ORONO 110189.1HD Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator John R. Gerhardson, rublic Works Director November 1, 1989 Subject: Hold Harmless Agreement -- Deborah Drive On August 28, 1989 the Orono Council app,.oved the installation of "speed bumps" on Deborah Drive. A private street contingent upon proper signage and entering into a Hold Harmless Agreement. Attached for review and approval is a draft Hold Harmless Agreement recommended by staff. Recos endation - To approve the Hold Harmless Lgreemen+- and to direct staff to obtain the necessary signatures from the homeowners of Deborah Drive. Proposed Motion - Moved by , seconded by , to reprove the Hold Harmless Agreement and to direct staff to obtain the necessary signatures from the homeowners of Deborah Drive. Aye:: na y s To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Forwarded recommending approval. /6 82489.1HD To: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator From: John R. Gerhardson, Public works Director Date: August 24, 1989 Subject: Speed Bum,•s Request - Deborah Drive Recently the City of Orono received a request from the residents on Deborah Drive to place "Speed Bumps" in the road at the time of paving. I denied their request and therefore they are appealing my decision to the City Council. Their concerns are the amount of traffic and the type of traffic and speed. Althougn Deborah Drive is a private road, the City regulates and control- private roads like a City street. The concerns of the residentb regarding type of traffic and speed can be enforced and regulated in a manner similar to regulating public streets, that being designating "No Truck Traffic" and police patrolling and enforcement. I have discussed speed bumps with maintenance and emergency service personnel and have been advised that ambulance, police and fire are somewhat restricted in response to areas with tral"iic bumps. Ambulances are becoming more and more equipped with electronic equipment which is severely affected by traf f is bumps. Recommendation - To deny the request for traffic bumps on Deborah Drive and to direct staff to work with the residents to resolve the above mentioned problems. Proposed Notion - Moved by , seconded by , to deny the request for speed bumps on Deborah Drive and to direct staff to work with the residents to resolve the above mentioned problems. Ayes _, nays To: Mayor :rabek & Orono Council Members From: Mark E. Bernhardson., City Administrator„'' Forwarded recommending approval. August 7, 1989 John R. Gerhardson Public works Director City of Orono P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Gerhardson: As you know, the McCulley Farm Homeowners Association has black - topped Deborah Drive, a private road, according to city specifi- cations and city inspections. Originally we were told by Glen Cook that our written specifications were acceptable and we pro- ceeded on that basis. In our specifications we call for four speed bumps. Much later I received from you a phone call indi- cating speed bumps would not be acceptable to the City of Orono. We are therefore requesting a review of your decision by City Council in order to allow the installation and maintenance Gf four speed bumps on Deborah Drive as was originally called for in our approved specifications. The Homeowners Association is very idamant and concerned in this l`? regard. Deborah Drive has always been a "cut thru" road for all to use even though it is a private road and so marked. Now with black top in place it's become a "race way" too. Many of our residents have children who use, bike or wait for the bus on this road. Even before blacktop there has been several serious accidents. It is our greatest fear that the next acci- dent will involve our children, which are our most loved trea- sures and blessings, and because of this we can not rest nor will we rest until this deadly problem is resolved. In conclusion, we are asking that all the people involved, whether your parents or not, please consider our plea and allow us the installation of these bumps as soon as possible. Sincerely yours, MC '" LLEY FARMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION t Thomas R. Betz 415 Deborah Drive% Maple Plain, MN 55::59 HOLD HARNMS AND INDffiNITY AGREEMENT 1. Parties. This Agreement is entered into on this day of , 1989 by and between the City o Orono (hereinafter "City") andM (hereinafter "Association"), a association lawfully organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 2. Back round. The Association has petitioned the City Council for perm ssion to build a series of speed bumps along Deborah Drive, a private road in the City. The purpose of said speed bumps iu to reduce traffic and the speed of traffic traveling on Deborah Drive. City staff recommended against allowing construction of speed bumps based on concerns about their effectivenes and potential liability for property damage and personal injury from --srsons traveling over or evading the speed bumps. The City Council at its meeting on August 28, 1989, agreed to permit speed bumps based on their construction in conformity with certain specific conditions, including execution of a hold harmless and indemnity agreement. 3. Agreement of the Parties. The City and the Association in mutual consideration hereby make the following promises: a. The City hereby agrees to permit construction of four speed bumps on Deborah Drive between and spaced at a distance no less than feet. Signs warning of the speed bumps shall be place7ino less than M__ feet from the bumps facing both directions. The speed bumps will stretch over the main lanes and not over the shoulder portion of the road. All construction will be solely at the Association's expense. b. The Association hereby agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the City against any and -.11 loss, damages, claims, liabilities, fines, penalties, or expenses which the City may incur in connection with the construction, existence, or operation of the speed bumps, including evasion thereof. C. The Association commits to make the necessary levy or charges against its members to satisfy any cost cr expense arising out of this Agreement, if adequate funds are not on hand when such cost or expense arises. d. The City and the Association hereby pledge that each party has taken all steps necessary under their respective organizational documents and controlling state and federal law to enter into this Agreement. 4. the City and the Association agree that nothing in this Agreement in any way limits the City Council at any time from requiring removal of the speed bumps if it finds that their removal is in the public interest. The City will endeavor, but is not required to provide notice of any such action prior to its execution by the City Council. Upon removal of the speed bumps this Agreement shall be null and void. 5. Miscellaneous. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties pertaining to the subject matter herein and shall be modified only by written agreement signed by the parties. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure the benefit of and be enforceable by the parties heret.i nad their respective heirs, succesors, and assigns. This Agreement shall be governed, enforced, and construed under the laws of the State of Minnesota. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date below but effective as of the date above written. Homeowners Association By CITY OF ORONO By 116CMC.IL MEETING, 3 NOV 13 1989 CITY OF ORONO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Berr,nardson, City Administrato�� DATE: November 6, 1989 SUBJECT: Navarre Meeting - Saturday, November 18, 1989 9:00 a.m. - Gray Freshwater Biological Institute Attachment: Navarre Re -Development Meeting Memo Dated 10/6/89 ISSUE - Reminder of the upcoming meeting on November 18, 1989. INTRODUCTION - Attachment A outlines the proposed schedule. Coffee an rolls will be available for attendees. The staff is currently sending out notification to interested property owners in the area regarding this meeting. cc: John Shardlow, Dahlgren, Shardlow, Uban Ed Hasik, Dahlgren, Shardlow, Uban Gray Freshwater Biological Institute 1. ri. 10689.4HD To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato Date: October 6, 1989 Subject: Navarre Re -Development Meeting - Saturday, November 18, i 989, 9:00 a.m. - Noon - Freshwater Biological Institute Issue - Confirmation of November 18th, 1989 as date for Navarre meeting. Introduction - A.- the September 25, 1989 Council meeting there was a possibility the date selected for the Nava:rn meeting would conflict with LMCD Board's review of the various committee drafts for the Comprehensive Management Plan. They have postponed having their meeting on the loth. Discussion - It is anticipated that the City's redevelopment meeting would run from about 9:00 to noon. The rough agenda would be as follows: 9:00 a.m. Presentation to those interested in the inventory and suggested solutions 10:00 a.m. to Noon Discussion of alternatives and directions Recommendation - it is recommended that the Council accept the information regarding the Navarre meeting. Proposed Notion - Moved by , seccnded by , the Council accept the information regarding the meeting. Ayes , nays cc: Planning Commission Members John Shardlow Ed Hasik Freshwater Biological Institute 1 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: November 7, 1989 SUBJECT: Administrator's Information 11789.6 c-,l T COUNCIL MEETING N 0 V 13 1989 CITY OF ORONO HIGHWAY 12 FEASIBILITY STUDY - It is not expected that the City will ear anything from the Minnesota Department of Trans•)ortation until the end of this month. HIGHWAY 12 1992 SAFETY IMPROVEMENT - MnDOT is currently awaiting word from the City of Long Lake regarding the resolution of the frontage road to serve two properties just east of Willow on the south side of 12. 1972 SHADYWOOD - Intermittent observations of this property have shown itt a evidence of duel: feeding, but with the freeze up of the lake any open water in the area wil: be indicative of congregating waterfowl and staff will be following up to monitor that. 3536 LYRIC AVENUE - A new hearing regarding clean up of this prcperty has not been scheduled as yet. FALL CLEAN UP STATUS - At the Cit�'s clean up held on Octol.er 21, 1989 the city received over 10 - 40 yard containers for disposal in the landfill together with receiving a record number of leaves, which were placed at the city's sewer compost site, together with shipping out to a private vendor 25+ appliances. From a volume standpoint this has been the most successful fall clean up to date. As restrictions and costs on landfills become greater there will be more and more propensity to discard such items in ditchs and on other peoples property. While the cost of providing this service continue to increase it is appropriate that the City avoid substantial cluttering of its natural environment by offering this semi-annual opportu:.:ty. This will be especially true next year when garbage haulers will no longer be able to accept leaves. Before next year, staff is exploring the possibility of a charge for those utilizing the service in order to at least cover a portion of the cost. SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS - SEPTEMBER - See attachment. ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS - See attachment. GOAL SETTING STATUS - See attachment. 1 CITY OF ORONO SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS, DISBURSEMENTS AND BALANCES FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 BBGINNING 1/1/89 ENDING 9/30/89 -------------- CASH TOTAL TOTAL CASE INVESTMENT BALANCE BUDGET (C) TRANSF INVEST BUDGET (C) OF TRANSF INVEST BALANCE INVEST FUND BALANCS -----«------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/1/89 RECEIPTS 1989 IN SOLD DISBUR 1989 BUDGET OUT PURCH 9/30/89 BALANCE General 2,961,356 1,903,932 2,620,660 2,060,296 2,720,660 75.712,249,161 555,033 Parks 116,402 21,116 17,000 366 137,152 CDGS 0 0 0 0 Equip Outlay 263,161 21,653 69,200 76,137 112,530 67.71 208,677 Bldg Cap Outly 145,228 10,856 129,500 1,905,000 8,509 2,052,575 Nun Bt Aid Cons 3,519 190,000 0 190,000 3,519 Per Impr Bev 249,081 65,940 534,261 41,576 707,606 Swr-Wtt Cons 89 0 49,795 (49,795) Imp Bond 66-76 1,09,720 69,235 82,800 176,654 17:,190 102.01 502,301 Imp goad 80 475,S65 66,249 96,600 121,796 121,740 100.01 420,018 Imo Bond 82 195,025 14,530 15,650 69,283 68,360 99.90 141,272 Imp Bond 85 136,861 74,524 91,150 29,715 108,390 27.41 181,660 Swr-Wtr Bond 89 126,250 0 126,250 Water Op 11',523 136,313 191,500 127,060 174,540 72.8% 122,776 Bawer Op 443,170 481,001 463,220 431,478 361,240 119•A: 492,693 Golf Course Op 0 122,964 92,190 93,828 101,850 (a) 92.10 29,136 Pooled Inv Trust Fund 5.514,024 ------------------------------_--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (5,514,024) 397,901 11,042,928 397,901 11,104,663 (5,575,759) 5,575,759 TOTALS 5,514,024 ..Y..MYwMW.i.M.r. -4,589 3,702,454 ...... M......s 3,868,470 ....... 2,439,161 11,042,428 ........ 3,683,394 3,942,500 2,4?9,161 11,104,663 55,914 5,575,759 TOTAL LT 5,361,402 56,648 3,243,990 3,62S,176 ................ 120,850 13,249,357 ....................................... 3,513,985 3,624,030 ...v 120,850 e......A.........►.....0...�. 12:793,430 242,580 4,905,475 YSAIt......................................... ............... «........ ............................................ ................................ ..... TOTAL 1989 CASH i INVESTMENT TO 9/30/89 $5,631,673 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY - 1989z --------------------------------------------------------- NOTE (a) Golf operating fund budget does not include amounts for purchases 1 OF for resale or sale• tax collected/remitted. The receipts budget projects -------------------.------------------------------------- REVENUE BUDGET BUDGET gross profit - not total receipts. Taxes 585,221 1,212,030 48.3% NOTE (b) General fund revenues recorded will not equal receipts collected Licenses i Permits 108,212 90,000 120.21 due to receivables billed in other accounting periods and non -revenue Intergov. Revenue 298.634 420,540 71.00 receipts. Chgs for Sery 536,943 623,990 86.01 Fines 83,024 95,500 86.91 NOTE (c) Budget amounts include schedules transfers, do not includ- fund Iot. on Invest. 175,372 165,000 106.3% balar.L* uses or additions. Tran. Pr Other Funds 0 0 Other ----------------------------------------------- 25,240 13,600 185.6% TOTAL REVENUE 1,812,646 2,620,660 69.21 (b) CITY OF ORONO INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS - ELECTRONIC HIRE TRANSFERS OCTOBER 2l - NOVEMER 9 DATE TRANSFER FOR 10/25/89 Interest on Fed. Home Loan Bonds 10/25/89 Proceeds from Matured Commercial Paper 10/25/89 Purchase Commercial Paper 10/25/89 Purchase Co,,merciel Paper 11/01/89 Proceeds from Matured Commercial Paper 11/01,189 Proceeds from Matured Fed. Farm Credit Bank bonds 11/01/89 Purchase Commercial Paper 11/01/89 Purchase Fed. Farm Credit Bank Bonds J 1 FROM TO AMOUNT Marquette 1st Bank Lakes $ 7,700.00 Norwest Bank 1st Bank. Lakes 902,000.00 1st Bank Lakes Norwest Bank 1499,160.42) 1st Bank Lakes Marquette (402,020.40) Norwest Banff 1st Bank Lakes 500,OG0.00 1st Bank Mpls 1st Bank Lakes 209,800.00 1st Bank Lakes Norwest sank (199,331.11) is" Bank Lakes Norwest Bank (500,000.00) GOAL SETTING '87 SiO - 1997 Shoot Ten Objective CITY OF -ITC D '88 Sio - 1988 Short Tau Objective '89 SM - 1989 Short Tern mistivc AN' PUM B. BERNiD1RD" CITY ADML4ISIRk?U t 1 MAY 1989 - 30 AYRIL 1990 Draft 5/19/89 Revised 6/10/89 /89 /89 9/r1 k/89 +!7�J89 AREA GOAL AREA C&IELTIVE MATES STATUS 1. CC?lMTY DtVE[APMEITf A. Highway 12 1 Utilities Sewer - Part I Install 09/01/89 Bids Close 6/30/89 Project Ordered 7/24/89 Negotiating Asmnt Terms/D-velop Agr=t Commenced Construction 10/27/89 Seder - Part II Install 07/01/90 Water System Install Main 09/01/89 Project Ordered 7/24/89 Commenced Construction 10/27/89 Well (6 months) 04/01/90 2/l/90 Need available water 9/11/89 Table Tent Well to 9/25/89 9/25/89 Awarded Test Wells Il/l/89 Commence Test DrMings 11/6/89 Test dril'ing fowid adequate aquiEas Tower (9-12 months) 07/01/90 Plans Specs - Order 09/89 Award 11/89 Financing �_/14/89 Bond Aesoluticn adopted Requested rj negotiate with Medira 10/23/89 Commenced water discussion 10/25/89 Negotiation on Utilities 09/11/89 Boryi Sale Awarded/AA1 Rating/6.571 (Luny Lake - Medina) 10/04/A9 Bond Closing 88 Sib 2. Long Term C .rLidor Upgrade 189 STO Feasibility SLUdy MnDOT initiation 09/01/89 6/30/89-n..__•+nS Response from MNDot or Central Office on Crnsultant 07/07/89 Delayed until at least ll/ M/89 Govtxnor's ;ra issporation Safety Mtg 10/26/89 Group initiation f, '11/90 Completion 10/90 3. 1992 Safety Improvement Preliminary plan 13/01/89 Info meeting held 7/24/89. Awaiting Lorna Lake approval response to MnDOT 10/3/89 Hold meetinq with MnDOT - Discussed with _.ten 10/11 Need to Develop Frontage Road Prelim Cuts - Develop warrants/Willow Drive 0 AREA GOAL AREA OBJECTIVE DATES STATUS 1. CCRIUNITY DEVEWPD£NT Continued 188 SIO r. Navarre Relevelopmeit Determine project soope/ 08/01/89 6/01/89-ile,,1 J(Jnt 189 Sm direction 6/26/89 Discussed futuLa direction 9/1:/89 C:Y^ged to 11/18 18, SM C. County Road 15 Project completion 07/01/89 Froject completed Special assessmeit3 09/01/89 8/28/89 Assessment adooted Beautification Plan Determine means to implement 10/01/89 9/89 Request regarding Christrnas decorations to 10/23/89 Council meeting - Requested proposal from star, if aesned appropriate 187 STO D. Ccmunity Transportation Update capital project 07/89 Plan ;uidelines ©ridge bonding program 09/89 7/10/89 Adopted �d to submit request for plans and .cific3tions to submit to State - `quest to prepare to 11/13/89 Council mtg Continued analysis public/ 08,189 7/24/89 Memo Private/Public/Driveways/Roads private 8/28/89 Mend Re: City Attorney Privste RoWs E. County Road 116 Pre).iminary plan review 08/01/89 Set public info mtg fa. design review at 7/:.G ntg Resident revi w 7/26 Held Public info 9/25 - Tabled to 10/23 , 10/23/89 Preliminary design appLoved - Resolution adopts' '87 SYg F. Storm Water Management 188 Sm Plan 189 mn '88 STU G. Community Development A.) Enhance effective controls 10/01/'r 189 Sm Directior, and Progress of marinas B.) Work towareis service and results "No Surpr i.3.—.." process t- I L 2 aIBA Ol4L A18A 2. @NIP]eEHfAt. PIOIII,TION A. Stu Bay '89 S , B. Solid tilts Ma s mant C..tt[o Waste etplacsmt P.Jact Lift Statlm 10/Ll ft Statim 13 egdcaent OBIQ.TNE W1P5 STA'11S Poblic lNomatimal MKtlN 08/15/09 Meeting held 2/22/B9 9ignlfic t Isauea Meao Prsmtd at 9/25 .tg Tabled to 10/23/89 10/23/89 - Teblad Iss to avt .sting Oete[adne assessment arm lntmst 11/Ol/89 et9age an appralas 11/15/89 Conaldea fii ing optima 11/30/09 Coneidat dselt9.st mratocim 12/30/89 Bond sale 12/30/89 If 42,Mfi.te - I t ate profit - ProJmt bid 03/90 - Co pmjc 06/90 - As. pr.Jct 10/90 - Cal at. prolatt to/90 B iea ar9mltd mllccim 09/09 if nadd P.L. I.ogtaa patfor..ca 10/89 Rebfd contract f.x c bsi'- to/89 To be bid for 19W Bw(.1 (rcen[ivea to laprwa 02/51 participatim Coglati— Bid wavd wbllc iafm tlmal .eatiq - ri.ing tapleaeat fimrci, - Caned(. cts9ea 10/01/89 Oel.yd to at least IZF11/89 os/22/89 V22/89 Bid awrdd 06/89 6/22/89 Pt. ttm itn .9. held 03/89 9/16/09 Cmattactim eo•.tcd Cannatlm c gft rLptd 8/16/09 9/20/99 Gnat otly m Jmd paadin9 KLC wrk I ual laAl. AILa OBIRTIYB BATE 59AT8 • 1. TOIWIYATIOIAL Domat�+r A. 1990 C it Gael Betting Commce Ot/89 8/28/89 P[alWaty 19W Bttategla ('cal aettin9 Presented CosplRe 09/89 B. 1990 Budget Process Aesoaaent Board o2 Review 05/89 Bd o[ Ravi. bald 5/11/89 6 V24/09 drallainary Budget Widelino OWN Presented Initial Wlda:lna 6/12/69 Capital ptojwta widellner 08/99 P[aentad Awlsed Culdellna 6/26/89 Initial revised plan 199 20W revio Proent 10/23/09 Alt6ate Data 08/01 - 00/15 Prallalnary sill levy adoptlan 09/15/89 6/30/89 May regW[a ectim by 8/1/89 09/15 - 10/15 Haying In Tasetlml Adopted ralLlaKy na lwy 8/26/89 Adoptad7 p[fltet ass 8/20/69 BPatial it 9/2mry b9 sat 9/T//89 r1M Bulgat �.._:..a pending [aolb of Bpclal Session Bu1ge:.6,tim 10/15/89 Awlsed 0d . to W aaii fm W13/09 10/25/09 Final levy sdoptim W35/w C. low Gglelative P[ogrs Miw 12/89 D. T. Building Staff 12/89 C it B A. Pcilltis Up9i We Detwaine If udettskiny - Financial Ccete site - PoDlio inf.tloe esetiM(e) If DMettskc Sit. eo9u41tion, if ary .:msx "Chest C.Lgn FLnl p11uWoosts Plane/spcificatione Finessing Bid wards '17 B10 B. Iaq Bang. Financial Develop Wlace of policy IS Blll Policy C. Rube strategy Plan po11ce WIf Ccene D. sereiCe Reel. 0ngin,rinq ecVics Legal cervices B. Aoessing service eepl.ent ,aim sums 0/01/89 6/29/89 Bus tout of fcllltlet Meeting set for 11/8/89 I2/89 07/01/69 1/10/0 P-.ctd to C Ll 09/01/89 7/10/89 Initial option to Couch Ducted to assess idea to mete profitatle 09/69 10/s9 7/10/69 Cereal ducted transitional cranqemct plus mplate amtraet ew. eeploye "t 0/15/89 'lib• etbWtted 10/11/99 RV's ttatilttd - Il/3/89 due back AIPI� �AVAPEA OOJH.T1gE M1S 3011I01 5. IAl91n t�OJ�15 A. Cap .tim 0eplwe prfarvice lm�-tive 10/09 Pro9rm bplae Taft.i. B tflW/ 07/01/89 IM Section 125 Plm OetaNne Satlm 09 ralulreemte 10/01/09 Mticlpete Atley in Pqulrar:b Ca i tll efts I/+9 9/20/89 A-ticlpte sxvpwel¢-q reel K regolrmenr S. Peplq et Affirn tive Actlm Pragrm 07/01/09 6/99 W lager Stete regAtmmt edcptlm 6. tPJnq' COUNCIL ARM NOV 131989 Cm OF ONONO LIST OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR MEETING OF November 13, 1989 Gambline License - Art Center of Minnesota .sell raffle tickets for June 28, 1990 event One Day Set Up License - Art Center of Minnesota Holiday House Wednesday, November 29, 1989 l/ GiApplication z�%�� ham- srn� Carte Ylnneaota LaryJa! aamellne >'�7.3JS for Ezemption from �°` O1 °" °"ry Lawful Gambling Licease Pin Te unthaasdpm sa Ns sppi"a forexempa and send itw allseer a days befas yourpsmb'irpsohh* kxproeseseq. None I None ve Wayzata. MN 55391 1 Hennepin .... rnrr rae�r nwn Annc Stovar. Direc.h13 413-7361 David Swanson 1n32 227-9460 Type gjNon prytt Organisation Yeanin asetanp i1 Aaach pnddfhteoyew or more olexlnenn. Number of actin member 001 D Frelemal Cl Religious ❑ velaws M (IIMr nomprad pgoo sharked box Acyaf/wr nonptoa, chock one of th, folbwing and attachpool of rronpofd stays ❑ IRS designation O kenrporaed wish Sacretary of State ❑ Affiliate of parom nonprolit organotation (thane,) anal ao aoa 1aeff240 Northshore Ur. Wayiata AN 55391 Nennepirn � �e)Ju�2J. 1J90 a... res Na 1 .ripe Financial Report rq 1 grease Hmwfpit be Dkto grn*gsawm,gamed J ehnanao the exhioition spaces at Art Center. Dl.seurvs Berne serer I pea.. ae dallaMaeas aW,aeed a dr Dspr aGwev Ide.Nre or hfmasa, lAeaM'r pas Gprserf of Goiq a mr. amaea &adaesrrr . alrt ox a s, estleompir Local Government Acknowledgement I I w rao . I a copy of ra appfi0eon. T1 apabm wa YW rw.wad by the Dape,snent of Ga and ell Wan e elrrdry. w X d nm she doe a n ' by lr aM a ouury, oNaaa en IUN goasrnmesf passes a radk b spadlulY pohee fr aw"ty. A copy N etr meWeon mutt ben ad by do Deg m a GefigwailndaysadrderaWnallowcftrCites MItitd a. new eo coven whidi b dlaYpw h activay. W c--nt)r _— _. Teafri CM Orcousry nres -_ Teerahly neon S4'ae,es d groan neswnp •pploaon foresee of passe rsovi apalasaan __.— Tre Dar naslsee 11n Dpa nswd Mall this application and fN Of $25 a Ra.) to: .� D",Imem of Gam�nq Control Diwmn Wit $lOnn 3Jt St Paul, MN 55146 3315 ONE DAY SETUP PERMIT Date of event: Weal. AyQEjyy7�q^ /989 Time II 1 Cp /O tw fill CItY tfORM FF a BFEICE 1J1713'�p 5 pp Y i f2fpf R .'S•09 FECE4°� li rj/jV1 STATE OF MINNESBN0 L'WJ A 9JSC9J R.41 'n piFa u�r�leror DEPARTMENT Df PUBLICC SAFETY . . .. I/O7 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO ONLY ALLOW CONSUMPTION G DISPLAY OF INTOXICATING LIOUON ITMI ApdkFlkn " M TFMnd" and 3411 Bden Awns In Of sawn Vital In wIm.IM Ib Iglowlnp mntlw "APPLICANT" NMI b perume n Idlmn: For a Pan—nihi, ww of this panun AMI uwux Thal Fppllwtlm lw All membrn Of Mr Pnm aria _ For A Cwpwa km. Om oflkw AMI ...U. his appholl. Iw dl ollkFn• hrwtw6 and nwYhc ens. Fw a Pub, On, of Ins dub I III F.FPu tide nolicatlM Iw all Aa mamba. If gdlllmM Ipq 11 .pulse, use A xpMlniNwl OI porn, Imidni g BY numb. Na gwllkn wgwrN. IFEE FOR PERMIT — S)OOOMX $25. 00) �,/ EVERY OUEETION MUST BE ANSWERED . t. I, ill A i>& ,AfwAyn Ivry M ttii)vwdy�w/zA�`P/. Aa�nri%>w<sy.�. , for andin behest of /h/IAT" lilY3^ P>� /�itULt�.T Hy). i sYJ/w consumption aln.w...wt of In.,,..... ar.+V !—Zby epy� Iw a 0tseermlt 'sawing conaumpliop and ddipali of IntpxAlcaring IIIPor to b louts' at 1=2 Aram .S4n'T. /LniY. , MunklpOH of (AA9 rat , Past "Not of �i7y7_O}Qi.,_ • Counir of /)rfalfll s /0 , wY MX... State of Minnaou, in accordance with Ow prowbloru of M.S. 340.119. 2. Will business be operated as a private club in pudic pace SOP/ LO>`P. 2. Suit type of bull arrE --2a1=� a. FOR A PUBLIC BUSINESS! It a partnership, state name and addren of nch member of pwtnanhip; V a corporation, mu name and addran of officers and directors. .nwnl IAMN Lam. 5. FOR A PRIVATE CLUB: Data club was organit. is club incorporated nn , number of m bat �' , langth of time in proem location , la club building owned a ranted, what is tlN membership dun �(� what xe Ne rpuinar l for wssw,bnshm d A Dan club maintain lucbn to ha unit by me W— — •!Mnq Intoxicating Iipuor, Ah . Nemac of MI officers and/or directors of Ma club: .II Inrn. I.Y!_I .w.r IAawr Enclose with this application A copy of the Constitution and BY-LJ of the club and currant list of bona fide members. d. It apyticant or, any "Bur. cnpernion oPl o r or'factor, club olfker or director. is not a : 1. An of the Unitad Sum. Ain such non<itieans _ ). State rwme of person who will con at or mnW¢ blNinm: 1 S.Or that floor is 1N ntabihmant located or to N lamed _ _A2uc Flit,- 9. Now are dM offers t .1.ifiW antler the zoning ordinal Apwp.M Iw Y�gar. ID '� DO AsOr USE O.Ica Cn sew d n.In n. •' wc I}. 10. Sure mm• and sddren of owner or ownan of building' wherein the budneia will he locata is iy 11. Has happlicant; if psrtmnhip, .my partner; it corpantien, my officer or director; it club, any club officer or dractor, aver had a license under the Rinnapta Liquor Cordsof Act mokM or wpendad or been convicted for my violation of State Laws or loin ordinances; it p, give bets and details AId 12. Is applicant; It parmanhip, any partner; If corporation, my officer a director; If club, any club officer or director, a member of the pq lunimg body of IN munklpHity or county in which this permit is to ber barred; It W. in what capacity Yes 10. Has appllcenL if pamwNhip, any ptrovr; It corporation, any oNlcar or director; If club, any club officer or director. any interest whauaner, directly of Imlrecdy. In my liquor ntabiblunent in the State of Minnesota //n Give name and addrm DI ouch nteblbhmant 14, Fumbh the'nape'and add. of at least three Wainer ratenncnA'Inctudingom bank nfar m: MM�. i/i0. /Jrl fat. !A 7) a a,2, it* lis- atiz jio, / /er n aim- lrl4sb/. � i�-i/rn. /�i bi LIIA°R R/SYMnef.S i W �/ifiiJ/If �%yi�. w`� - 15. Wit Intoxicating liquor be sold on the promises _L= Is. let Slate whether appl_cation is: 1. Original -,X_ g: Renewal 0. Transfer Ibl State whellnr dancing will be permitted an the premise AM 17. Am the pnmon now pc�upI If or to be occupied, entirely separate and exclusive from any other bus. .,,birth..., 1 S. St." Vale name to beusedf1A 18. Stare whether an "On Sale" or "Off .Sees" Non Intoxicating Malt Beverage License her at will be granted in conjunction to this Wameu and for the tame pmmhnVC _ 20. Has there been icount or will there bei�w.. i SM.00 Federal Recall Liquor Dollar's Special Tax Stamp lowthe alb of liquor on thne Pronnes A/A 71. Has your, local government an onlumece regubting the consumption and display of intoxicating liquor gl. It operating under toning ordinance how is location of Wilding classified 1�w.'wW : YM Yr'/M. •I IM~i W�w�s Y w: is II ��"eY .~eve YYw'..— IM"w everev l.or—iii'ai 4�aws ,wWY• in wY ewwX..1 IS Hustlers Uwpa Ml TNaT •NV I..l WL4 astare pur beet MDT allow idea YLL by IMleirs"ewn uww war . w axxxxx Lv al sera, rYr• LL111. NO CONSIDERATION WILL BE GIVEN TO THIS APPLICATION UNLESS APPROVED AS HEREINAFTER PROVIDED: II applicant is located In the Caunly, in. Chairman of the Bard of County Commmionen or his Rprrnammu a Intl' pprov bath epic of the appl'GIioN. II applicant is located in a whicipaity. Ma P,nldent of ibe Council or her Repreerntauvx atoll approve Win copies of this imps Can. Islen••••I an•vY•• bed end swyr Iy belser m• t day of My Cornmi nppnpires sm'�Mewan� War�ul' IMII"Pay cgMal M �� arraar aY _ r'•,'J;K'Sty'r-r'•'_�i.,•,Ir••.ti+i•nfe4•.1FM,•�t,.'ir 1Wti.Ifi�F,r s.: i:.s.•.k.�1L�fC•�i1r+ici' o .�:E:}��G Jt• 0 10/29/99 PR: 32 CB PRREGOR fA? cq)fCi EMP f NAME ABRAHAMSON FREDERIC ANDERSON, 6RUCE L BERNHARDSON, MARK E 808ZIEN, SUE A BOSMA, JAMIE L BRINKHAUS, JOHN F CHESWICK, GARY B CHRISTIANSON. SALLY CORNICK, JAMES L DENNISON. TROY A ENGLISHIII, IRVING H ERICKSON, KURT R FISCdENICH, DAN T FRITZLER, JOHN M GAFFRON MICHAEL P GERHARDtON, JOHN R GREGORY, JAMES 0 HALLIN, DOROTHY M HANSEN, STEVEN C HANSING, CAROL J JOHNSON, BRADLEY P KILBO, M'ELVIN H KNUTSON. CHARLOTTE A KUEHN, THOtIAS M KUYPER , SCOTT E MABUSTK, JEANNE A MILLS 3R,'WALTER H MORAN , MARK F MOROWCIYNSKI. JAMES NAAB, THERESA L OAS, DANIEL O OBRIEN, RANDY L OMAN. LYLE E QUAST. WAYNE A RATHBUN, HARRY J SASS JOHN J SCHAU55, CHARLES R SCHEFFLER, LAURIE K SKRFEN, DALE S STEFFENF!AGEN, RONALD STEVENS, BETTY G THOMTON, MARK R TOMCHECK, LAWRENCE f TOMCLYK MARK W YANG. BAUCE L WALSH KEVIN L WALTEI�S . L INDA 11 YEAGER, DONALD C P. PT 93 C(IUNr1L MEETING Nov 13 1989 CITY OF. • .. .. ter., ,.. � - � �•r 1. is •� YTD CURRENT _ GROSS GROSS 340-75 76.50 34619-36 1466.47 48399.54 2115.60 19519.26 88E.d0 11536.59 130.01 29957.25 1306.00 32260.20 146C.00 4057.26 180.00 33880.50 1299 20 433.50 61 .r 34426 19 1388.34 34 ��+3. 30717.82 1415.32 30425.96 1323-56 _ 32469.30 1364.18 27877.28 1287.21 37275.34 1693.37 2671L-GS 1346.53 24374.92 IIGB-00 21225.10 1146-30 11383.37 480.L2 32007.32 1402 53 40510.00 1888-68 19497.55 889 40 38392.76 1798 96 9767 35 733.51 33083 60 1504.96 Z310 90 26.13 31263 85 1337.28 37132.77 1519.94 10225,03 8a6.40 1522-50 55.00 21840,98 L044,70 23492.55 L218.00 25654.66 1040.20 22075.41 898.40 23565 44 L137.90 26203.71 1030,36 17000.10 797.70 231L2.03 LISI.10 24403.28 111D.32 3512.29 105.00 28944,21 L299.20 31331.53 1299.20 30689.78 t364.L6 SL8.20 519.20 889.79 219 s6 11704.44 894 71 1260 75 Z40 75 --'F49065 39 ,M1..;r,.�....�..c-w•+rv'x°-,' �5, d od.lit'A j.�) r ,!1'Y.`Iv"=x�JM'J:0. , CH PR /EGOIN 33 YTO CURRENT EMP a MANE DPT GROSS GROSS CALLAHAN. EDNARD J 11 265837 261.67 00ETTEN. J DIANN 11 2659.37 241.67 GRABEN JAMES 11 3300. 00 300.00 NE77LE6. ALAN R 11 2658.37 241,67 PETERSON, BARBARA A 11 2558.37 241.67 1.266 ea 1099 CITY OF ORONO CHECK N0. DAIE 296148 3I7003 ll/O7/09 311003 11/08/29 317003 11/Oa/19 317003 1)/00/69 ]17006 :l/Ot/t9 3 L TOO$ 1l/01/t9 317106 11/01/t9 31 TJOI 11/0//t9 317000 11/06/19 317006 1./08/10 317006 11/08/80 317006 it/01/t9 317006 L1/01/89 317006 11/06/80 31700E 11/01�19 317000 11/08/1/ 31 TO10 I1/01/t9 317011 11/0/%A9 317030 11/08/99 317030 11/00/89 317030 11/01%10 317030 11/08/90 317031 19 11/06/10 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION .00 CRYSTEEL DIST INC .00 15.00 ATOM KILBO 15.00 ATOM MOROACZKI I5.00 ATOM CHESWICK 65.00 93.01 ALL STAR IRO UOLF CO JACKETS 93.01 53.31 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC PRINTER RIBBON 33.32 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 11.32 ACRO-NINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 25 Sl ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 11.32 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 11.32 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 47.26 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 5L.35 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLiCS 26.90 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 25.51 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES S 3.17 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC PRINTER RIBBON 11.32 ACRO-MINN-SOT•. TNC OFFICE SUPPLIES 51.61 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 25.51 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 11.32 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 447.88 - 13.90 AT&T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 13.90 131.05 ALL STAR ELECTRIC TRAFFIC LIGHT 216.06 ALL STAR ELECTRIC (MINT REPAIR 35S.59 19 J3 AT & T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROCESS 12.63 AT & T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROCESS 19.63 AT & T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROCESS & NFO SYSTM DATA PROCESS 19.63 AT T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROCESS 10.63 AT & T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROCESS 120.65 6.37 AT & T COW TELEPHONE 13.62 AT & T COMM TELEPHONE 11-13-89 PAGE 1 ACCOUNT N0. INV. t P O. 0 MESSAGE •••-923 •••-CKS 01-6390-120-31 O1-6300-129-31 01-6390-129-31 74-6101-501-96 01-6320-175-16 01-4362-269-62 01-4343-090-17 01-6360-039-12 01-6360-059-16 01-6360-669-1S 01-6360-129-31 01-6360-176-33 01-4340.249-62 C1-6320-039-12 01-6320-129-31 •••-CKS •••-CKS L989 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO DAIE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 317031 11/08/89 31.23 AT A T COW TELEPHONE 48.92 - 317033 11/08/10 1.218.00 ATTITUDE DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVE MGMT 1,21B.00 317030 11/O8/89 247.56 AUDIO ELECTRONIC INC PARTS 247,58 - :.17038 1l/U.-; .9 24. GO ANDERSON-BRUCE 4 LUNCHES 24 00 317039 11/008/89 131.80 EARL F ANDERSON ASSC SIGNS 317039 11/01/so 1.193 .57 EARL F ANDER SONASS^ SIGNS 317039 11/09/89 749.09 EARL F ANDERSON nSSC SIGNS 2,074.58 317048 11/04/19 20 00 ASSN METRO MUNICIPS AM POLICY WIG 20. 00 - 317005 11/08/30 120.00 BLACKOWTAK 6 SONS TRASH HAUL 317085 11/0//09 125.00 BLACKOWIAK A SONS TRASH HAUL 245.00 - 317011 11/08/89 147 75 BLACKS PHOTOGRAPHY PHOTO FINISHING 147 75 - 317017 11/08/80 16.611. 50 BURY 8 CARLSON INC FOX ST 717097 11/08/89 3,599.20 BURY 8 CARLSON INC COUNTRY SIDE 317017 11/0#/89 L.566. 80 BURY 8 CARLSON INC WEAR/FINE MIX 317067 11/01/19 6E6.00 BURY 8 CARLSON INC WINTER MIX 317087 11/0111, 4.720.50 BURY 8 CARLSON INC GLENDALE AVE 317087 11/08/39 2,440.30 BURY 8 CARLSON INC MANOR CIRCLE 29,804,10 311090 I1101119 150 00 BUREAU CRIMINAL APPR 3RD OTR OPEN CHRG ISO OU - C1 i 11-13-69 PAGE 2 ACCOUNT NO INV • P 0 / MCSSAGE 01-4320-175-34 -CKS 01-4356-129-31 "'-CNS 73-4344-569-92 "'-CKS 01-4356-129-31 01-4233-249-42 01-42'3-249-42 01-4233-249-42 "'-CKS 01-4356-039-12 •••-CKS 01.13413-011-11 01-4347-290-61 -'--CKS 01-4210-129-31 ----CKS O1 4233-"9-42 01-4233-249-42 01-4233-249-42 01-4233-249-42 01-4233-249-42 01-4233-249-42 "'-CKS 01-4355-129-31 "'-CNS 19119 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRI^TION 317110 11/OA/I9 109.00 CHAPIN PUBLISHING AD 100.00 717114 11/01/t9 L33.29 CITYVIEM PLMHO 6 HTG REPAIR L33 29 317121 11/01/19 26U.25 CONCEPT MICROFILM MICROFILM 317121 11/08/89 272.60 CONCEPT MICROFILM MNT ACOSRDR/PRT 532.15 - 317133 11/01/I9 16.00 COW REV SALES TAX SALES TAX 317133 11/08/89 6.00 COM1-REV SALES TAX SALTS TAX 317133 11/Ot/19 273.00 COW -REV S-11•: TAX SALEa TAX 317 L33 11/06/89 445.00 COW -REV SA1fS TAX SALES TAX 745.00 317142 11/08/80 47,00 COPY OUP PR INC fR At:%PAR 1 317142 I1/01/19 50 00 COPY CUP PR INC DEVELIPER 317142 11/01/1, 10 00 COPY CUP PR INC PAPER PAY 317142 11/08/89 180.79 COPY OUT PR INC MA I N T XT 300.79 71714t 11/01/19 2, SL4.00 CRYSTEEL UIST INC SCRAPER DUMP TRK 2,114 00 317154 11/01/89 42,05 CYS UNIFORMS SLACKS 42.95 717157 11/Ot/19 6,939.68 DAMLGREN SHARDLON NAVARRE DEVELOP 6.939.61 317702 11/00/19 4.t1 EMRICH BAKING CO ROLLS 1.18 717212 '1/01/e9 10 20 EXPRESS MESSENGLP POSTAGE 10.20 11.13-19 PA:E 3 ACCOUNT N0. INV. 1 P.l. 1 MESSAGE O1-4322-039-12 •••-CKS 01-4343 V99-17 •••-CKS 01-4366-174-33 01-4340-129-31 •••-CKS 01-2222-000-00 01-3500-000-00 72-2222-000-00 74-2222-000-00 •••-CKS 01-12BL-000-00 01-4210-129-31 01-4210-129-11 01-4210-129-31 •••-CKS 14-4550-633-00 •• -CKS 01-4221-129-31 '••-CKS 01-4306-299-72 •••-CKS 74-4402-591-94 '••-CKS 01-4321-174-33 1919 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO GATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 3172t7 11/01/89 31. 32 SAFFRON/MINE MILEAGE 3/.32 317258 11/08/89 36 85 GLE WOOD INGLEWOOD WATER 3172St 11/08/19 38.85- GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD WATER 317258 11/02/89 38. 85 G_ENWOOD INGLEWOOD WATER 3B.t5 317269 11/08/89 135. 00 GOVERNMT TRAING SERV DEFENSIVE DRIV 3I72B9 11/08/89 725. 00 GOVERNMT TRAINS SERV CLASS TOMCZYK 317289 11/08/89 .05.G0 GOVERNMT TRAING SERV BLDG SEMTNAR KR5.00 317272 11/01/PV 214.82 G b K SERVICES UNIFORMS 317272 11/0/;89 79 72 G d K SERVICES RUGS 317272 ll/09/I9 18 21 G 6 K SERVICES UNIFORMS 317272 11/01,19 43.08 G d K SERVICES UNIFORMS 317272 1:; 01; R9 12 52 G b K SERVICES UNI ORMS 38S.71 71J 2t0 11/01/10 49.32 MACH CHEMICAL CO CHEMICALS 19 32 3172p 11/01/82 8.71 HAPPYS POTATO CHIP C33P5 8.71 717291 II/01/19 2 18 HALLIN/DOROTHY MILEAGE 2 It 317707 11/04/00 741.00 HENN CTY FIN DIV SEPT ROOM/BOARD 7Rt.0N 317301 11/08/80 71 07 F,N CTY SHERIFF OPT SEPT BOOKNU FEE 78 07 .'.-13-89 Pw3E 9 ACCOUNT NO Tray. t P 0. B MESSAGE •••-CKS 01-4381-170-13 •••-CKS 01-4231-099-17 OI-4321-099-17 0--4321-099-17 •••-CKS 01-4356-129-31 J1 4356-129-31 01-4�58-174-33 •••-CKS O1- 1221-2tP d2 01-63 t 3-129-31 7:-4221-549-91 73-4221-569-92 74-4221-590-i3 •••_CKS 72-4234-549-91 •••-CKS 74-4802-591-94 •••-CKS 0i 1351-020-.1 •• -CKS O1-4358.ONU-18 •••-CKS 01-4358-080-16 •••-CKS I889 CITY OF GROW CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 317330 11/08/00 94.78 ICMA RETIREMNT TRUST ICMA10/16-1-/29 94.78 ]1T338 11/08/80 048 00 ILLIES A SONS DIRT 648.00 317353 1l/08/89 11.80 INTL MAILING SYSTEMS POSTAGE MTR 3 MO 317353 11/08"1 11.10 INTL MAILING SYSTEMS POSTAGE MTR 3 MO 317313 11/0$/89 18,60 TNTL MA ILI NO SYSTEMS POSTAGE MTR 3 MO 30353 11/08/89 38.80 INTL MAILING SYSTEMS POSTAGE MTR 3 MO 311353 Il/04/89 19,80 INTL MAILING SYSTEMS POSTAGE MTR 3 MO 93.00 :HISS 11/08/90 84.9S INTERSTATE BATTERIES BATTERY 84.95 ]11184 11/00/89 3L 12 JAMES OFFICE AIL ENVELOPES 31. 12 R 3173f0 11/08/89 2S.72 JIM HATCH SALES CO PART 25.72 31731Z 11/08/89 41.75 JOHNS AUTO SUPPLY DEICER 317372 11/08/29 53. 35 JOHNS AUTO SUPPLY BLUE/ANTI FREEZ 317372 11/00/89 13.92 JOHNS AUTO SUPPLY DEICER 100,04 • 7113U 11/08/89 525.00 KILBO-MELVIN IACP CONVENTN 525 00 - 3LI327 11/08/89 35.72 KUEHN-THOMAS MILEAGE OCT 317397 11/0,/19 63, 79 KUEHN-THOMAS GFDA CONF TRAVEL 317317 11/08/19 I8.49 KUEHN-THOMAS MILEAGE OCT 717797 ll/08/89 19.24 KUEHN-THOMAS MILEAGE OCT 135 24 717394 ll/09/89 9 12 KUYPER SCOTT MILEAGE 9 12 11-13-89 PAGE 5 ACCOUNT N0. INV. 9 P 0. 8 MESSAGE 01-4140-039-12 •••-CKS 74-4343-590-93 •••-CKS 01-4321-039-12 01-4321-069-15 01-4321-174-33 01-4321-249-42 73-4321-569-92 •••-CKS 01-4232-249-42 •••-CKS OI 4210-020-11 •••-CKS OI-4232-249-42 •••-L NS 01-4220-249-42 01-4232-129-31 73-4220-569-92 •••-CKS 01-4356-129-31 •••-CKS 01-4381-069-IS 01-4381-089-IS 01-4361-174-33 73-4381-569-92 01-4381-129-31 1 1989 CITY OF ORONO CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT 317404 11/0 %IY 42 52 136 48 ' 31743S 1t/00/89 2.40 317435 11/03/89 20.02- 317435 I1,108/89 717,55 317435 ll/O8/80 415.97 317435 11/08/00 218 39 317435 11/0 /88 417.39 317435 11/O8/S9 802 26 317435 11/08/99 299.27 31743' 11/08/6B 116.00 3170- 11/08/80 116.00 3114" 11/00/89 110.00 317435 11/01/89 2.40 31743S 11/08/09 144.13 317435 11/08/89 74.76 317435 11/08/09 ll6 00 317435 11/08/89 2 in,317435 ll/08/09 2402 03 317435 11/OB/19 20.00 317135 11/02/80 118 00 4,152.83 317437 11/00/89 33.60 317437 11/01/82 11.077.50 Il,lll.10 T.7430 11/01/19 11.40 11.40 71i441 Il/06/89 91 3L 91 31 317 U2 11/00/80 404,49 469 49 • 311101 11/08/89 95. 70 4 CHECK REGISTER 11-13-89 PAGE 6 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV 4 P O R MESSAGE -CKE THE LAKER ADS 01-4322-039-12 THE LAKE ADS 01-4322-174-33 •••-CKS LOGIS - SUITE 300 MAINT DC EQUIP 01-4340-069-15 LOGIS - SUITE 300 MNT CONTRACT CREDIT 01-4340-129-31 LOGIS - SUITE 300 MAINT DC EQUIP 01-4340-174-33 LOGIS - SUITE 300 APRL SUPPORT SEP 01-4352-069-15 LOGIS - SUITE 300 APPL SUPPORT SEP 01-4352-129-31 LOGIS - SUITE 300 APPL SUPPORT SEP O1-4352-174-33 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DATA PROC SEP 01-4355-069-15 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DATA PR OC SEP 01-4355-129-31 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DATA PROC SEP 01-4355-174-33 LOGIS - SUITE 300 TRAINING CHRG 01-4356-069-15 LOGIS - SUITE 300 TRAINING CHRG 01-4358-129-31 LOGIS - SUITE 300 TRAINING CHRG 01-4358-174-33 LOGIS - SUITE 300 MAINT DC EQUIP 72-4340-549-91 LOGIS - SUITE 300 APPL SUPPORT SEP 72-4352-549-91 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DATA PROC SEP 72-4355-549-91 LOGIS - SUITE 300 TRAINING CHRG 72 4156-549-91 LOGIS - SUITE 300 MAINT OC EQUIP 73-4340-569-92 LOGIS - SUITE 300 APPL SUPPORT SEP 73-4352-569-92 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DATA PROC SEP 73-4355-569-92 LOGIS - SUITE 300 TRAINING CHRG 73-4356-569-92 •••-CKS CITY OF LONG LAKE 3RD OTR WATER 01-4324-129-31 CITY OF LONG LAKE 3RD OTR WATER 72-4359-549-91 •• -CKS LONG LK FORD TRACTOR ROLLER SEAT 01-4232-249-42 ••'-CKS LONG LAKE TIRE SERV TIRE REPAIR 01-4342-249-42 •'•-CKS MARTINS NAVARRE 66 AUTO REPAIR 01-4341-129-31 .• -CKS MED CTR HEALTH CARE INS NOV 01-4151-039-12 1980 CITY OF ORONO CHECK PEGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 317867 11/08/89 91.85 MED CTR HEALTH CARE INS NOV 317A67 11/01/t9 87.85 MED CIA HEALTH CARE INS NOV 717A67 11/OB/t9 191.01 MED CTR HEALTH CARE INS NOV 317867 11/08/89 283.86 MED CIA HEALTH CARE INS NOV 871.27 3 VA10 11/08/89 I,378.16 MIDNEST ASPHALT ACMC FINE 1,378.16 311885 11/08/89 13.50 MPLS OR YUEN CO DEMURRAGE 31 485 L1108/89 27.00 MILS OXYGEN CO DEMURRAGE 80.50 317t90 11/08/89 12.79 MINNEOASCO UTILITIES 12.79 31N 01 11/08/80 104.98 MN CELLULAR TILE MOBILE PHONES 168.88 31753A 11/08/89 250.00 MOTOROLA INC INSTAL MOBILES 250,00 317537 11/09/89 34.08 MORAN MARK MILEAGE 317537 11/08/49 23 52 MORAN MARK MILEAGE 57.60 317585 11/08/89 52.00 NAVARRE AUTO REPAIR RUCK REPAIR 317545 11/08/82 A8.A9 NAVARRE AUTO REPAIR PICKUP REPAIR 98.89 317582 11/01/89 253.53 NSP UTILITIES 317562 11/08/t9 218.95 NSP UTILITIES 317562 11/08/89 2.75 NSP UTILITIES 317562 11/0t/19 98.02 NSP UTILITIES 317562 11/OB/89 I42. 15 NSP UTILITIES 3 1756 2 11i09/89 13 20 NSP UTILITIES 317562 11/08/19 6 60 NSP UTILITIES 317562 11/08/00 1.397 70 NSP UTILITIES 317562 11/08/99 603.82 NSP UTILITIES I1-13-89 PAGE 7 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 8 P 0 8 MESSAGE 01-4151-069-15 O1-4151-129-31 01-8151-174-33 O1-4151-249 12 ••--CKS 01-8233-249-42 •'•-CKS 01-8232-129-31 01-4232-249-42 "•-CKS 01-8324-129-31 •••-CKS O1-4320-129-31 "'-CKS O1-4382-249-42 ----CKS 01-43T'-129-31 01-4381-129-31 •••-CKS 01-83A1-178-33 74-4341-"90-93 I -CKS 01-8328-090-17 O1-4324-129-31 O1-8328-175-38 O1-A328-2A9-82 O1-A32A-2A9-A2 01-4324-290-61 01-4324-290-61 72-4324-549-91 73-8328-569-92 1980 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 317562 11/09/89 68.61 NIP UTILITIES 317562 11/08/IS 79 .33 NSP UTILITIES 317562 11/08/89 75.74 NSP UTILITIES 2.950.40 317590 II/00/89 8 25 OTTEN BROS SOD 8 25 ]17597 11/08/t9 3.679.33 PUBLIC EMPL BET ASSN PERA 10/16-10/29 3.672,33 317598 L1108199 9 00 PERA INS LIFE INS 9 00 711015 11/08/89 0.10 PERRYS VENTURES INC CAR WASH 317615 11/01/t9 3.25 PERRYS VENTURES INC CAR WASH 317615 11/00/19 1 '0 PERRYS VENTURES INC CAP WASH 13 85 - 317021 I1/Ot/89 e47 00 PHYSICIANS HEALTH NOV INS 317621 11/01/Y9 197.00 PHYSICIANS HEALTH NOV INS 311621 11/01/B9 302,00 PHYSICIANS HEALTH NOV INS 317021 11/08/69 151.00- PHYSICIANS HEALTH NOV INS 317621 11/08/89 115.0P PHYSICIANS HEALTH NOV INS 317021 L1108189 305.!0 PHYSICIANS HEALTH NOV INS 317621 11/08/0B 1,061.20 PHYSICIANS HEALTH NOV INS 317621 ll/Ot/69 300.00 PHYSICIANS HEALTH NOV INS 317621 11/DO/39 764. 00 PHYSICIANS HEALTH NOV INS 317021 11/008/99 138.00 PHYSICIANS HEALTH NOV INS 317021 11/01/t9 207.00 PHYSICIANS HEALTH NOV INS 4,278.30 - 717027 11/06/88 43.50 PITNEY BOWES POSTAGE 43 50 317621 11/03/89 1.102.20 POPHAM HAIK 6 ASSOC LEGAL RETAINER SEP 317621 11/09/89 10,223.65 POPHAM HAIK 6 ASSOC PROSECUTIONNS SEP 317021 11/08/80 1.040.09 POPHAM HAIK 6 ASSOC LEGAL 105LL SEP 317129 11/089/80 1.028.10 POPHAM HAIK 6 ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT SEP 317628 11/01/lB 129.70 POPHAM HAIK 6 ASSOC DEBRA DR REBILL 117021 11/08/10 2.386. 25 POPHAM HAIK A ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT SEP 317628 I1/08/S9 351, 00 POPHAM HAIK A ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT SEP 317624 11/08/89 IS 00 POPHAM HAIK A ASSOC L EGA L CONSULT SEP 317621 11/01/99 623.40 POPHAM HAIK & ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT SEP 31702t 11/08/89 3.015 70 POPHAM HAIK 6 ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT SEP 11-13-89 PAGE 8 ACCOUNT NO INV. R P 0 1 MESSAGE 73-4324-569-92 73-4324-569-92 74-4324-590-93 --CKS 01-4233-249-42 •• -CKS 01-2031-000-00 01-4152-129-31 ----CKS 01-4341-24 '2 72-4341-54. 1 73-4341-569-92 "I -CHI O1-3872-000-00 01-4151-D?9-12 01-4t51-069-15 01-4151-121-31 01-4151-121-31 01-4151-126-31 O1-4151-129-31 01-4151-174-33 01-4151-249-42 72-4151-549-91 73-4151-569-92 '•`-CKI 01-4321-1'9-31 01-4501-080-14 OL-4302-080-15 Ot-43U3-080-16 C1-4303-080-16 OS-431 4-42 01-4 71 24-4 00 24-4 00 24-4 -00 26-4.. .39-87 1989 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE 317631 11/Ot/19 317131 11 %08/10 317531 11/08/89 317638 11/08/89 317113 11%Was 317113 t 089 i//8 08 31113 118/97 211613 11/08/89 3117860 11%Do 89 7110 317660 11/08/89 311675 11/02/82 317697 11/08/89 317719 11/02/10 3/77A0 11/08/19 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 19.927.09 • 1.817.00 POLKA DOT RECYCLING RECYLING OCT 1.617.00 90.28 PRAIRIE OFFSET 010 ENVELOPES 96.27 PRAIRIE OFFSET 810 ENVELOPES 32.70 PRAIRIE OFFSET AP FORMS 112.00 PRAIRIE OFFSET INVOICE 283.00 PRAIRIE OFFSET BUS CARD INSPEC 580.25 13.97 PRUDENTIAL NOV INS 5.90 PRUDENTIAL NOV INS .4.80 PRUDENTIAL NOV INS 12.00 PRUDENTIAL NOV INS 51.90 PRUDENTIAL NOV INS 3.00 PRUDENTIAL NOV INS 6.00 PRUDENTIAL NOV INS 110,17 . 135.00 ORLIN REDEPENNING TRASH 7-9 90.00 ORLIN REDEPENNING TRASH 7-9 150.00 ORLIN REDEPENNING TRASH 7-9 375,00 1,850 00 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 1.850.00 7.93 SCHARBER 8 SONS PARTS 7 93 • 199. 60 DIKIE PETRO-CHEM CHLORINE 199.SO 15 90 STREICHERS MACE 15 90 • 11-13-89 PAGE 9 ACCOUNT NO INV. 8 P.O. 8 MESSAGE •••-CKS 01-8392-295-65 •••-CKS 01-8210-039-12 01-4210-174-33 01-8322-069-15 01-4322-089-15 01-4322-174-33 01-8152-069-15 01-8152-059-15 01-8152-121-31 01-4152-126-31 01-8152-129-31 01-4152-174-33 01-4152-249-42 •••-CKS 01-4343-129-31 01-4343-290-61 74-8383-590-93 -CKS 01-1260-000-00 •••-CKS O1-4232-249-42 •••-CKS 72-4238-S49-91 •••-CKS 01-4232-129-31 •••-CKS 1989 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 317751 11/08/89 311.10 719.30 317771 11/02/89 75.90 75.90 ` 317779 11/01/10 1:103.10 1103.90 ` 3177Q 11/08/89 4.75 4.75 ` 3177t7 11/08/89 811.00 411.00 317I90 11/00/39 34.41 38.41 ` 317i15 11/01/30 59.03 317815 11/0111, 59.04 31781S 11/01/t9 29.52 317115 11/08/19 117 OS 317815 11/01/19 58.99 317115 11/01/to 59.03 317 815 11/08/29 $0.95 31711S ll/01/19 52.03 317115 11%01%O9 91�t8 717I15 11/01/Be 20 88 317815 11/01/89 54.89 317115 11/08/82 51 88 317 t 15 11/08/89 109.90 799.55 ` 317t21 11/01/89 50.83 50 83 • 311821 11/08/89 129.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION SUNDIAL SLOG SERVICE OCT CLEANING SUNDIAL BLDG SERVICE OCT CLEAN INO THOMTON/MARK REIMBURSE INS TRACY OIL CO FUEL TOMCZYK/MARK PARKING TURF SUPPLY CO SNOW MOLD TREATMT TONYS PIZZA SERV SANDWICHES US WEST Cp UN TELEPHONE US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE US WEST COMM'JN TELEPHONE US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE US WEST COMMON TELEPHONE US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE US WEST COMMUN ADVER VILLAGE CHEVROLET PARTS WALL STREET JOURNAL ANNUAL SUBSCRIP 11-13-'9 PAGE 10 ACCOUNT N0. INV. t P.O. •^>SSAOE 01-1310-000-11 01-03A9-129-31 "`-CKS 01-R151-121-31 ..._rK5 74-4324-500-93 "`-CKS 01-4381-129-31 "`-CKS 74-4343-590-93 •••-CKS 74-4BOZ-591-90 01-4320-039-12 O1-4320-059-14 I-4320-069-15 01-4320-129-31 OL-4320-129-3L 01-4320-174-33 01-8320-175-34 01-8320-249-42 72-4320-S49-91 72-4320-549-91 73-8320-569-92 71-4320-590-93 74-4320-590-93 71-4323-590-95 `"-CKS '••-CKS 01-8232-289-42 •• -CKS 01-4240-059-15 1919 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE 31713e 11/01/le 3172/2 11/03/t9 317842 11/08/89 3I7153 11/08/t9 317834 11/08/89 317154 11/01/t9 317t6e 11/08/89 317966 89 11/08/39 3vns 11/08/89 3'790! 11/08/19 311902 11/Ot//e 317903 11/Ot/19 717e03 11/01/2 317904 11/08/89 317905 11/08/89 317006 11/08/89 CHECK REGISTER 11-13-80 PAGE 11 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV. 1 P.O. R MESSAGE 129.00 ' •••-CKS 910.35 WATER PRODUCTS CO PARTS 72-4232-549-91 919.35 ' ••--CKS 3.969.42 WAYZATA-CITY OF WATER PURCH 3D GIB 72-4359-549-91 3.289.42 WAYZATA-CITY OF WATER PURCH 3RD GIN 72-4359-591-91 3,969.12- WAYZATA-CITY OF WATER PURCH 7RD OTR 72-1359-591-P3 3,9e9.A2 •••-CKS 726.00 W HENNEPIN RECYCLING RECLYINO FEE O1-4315-249-42 726 00 - 2SS.00 WMI SERVICES OF MN PORTELET 01-1331-210-BI 2.74 WMI SERVICES OF MN POR TELET 71-1331-590-93 257.74 • '••-CKS 216,00 WIDMER BROS REPAIR BREAK 72-4345-549-91 218.00 WIDMER BROS REPAIR BREAK 73-4345-569-92 216.00- WIDMER BROS REPAIR BREAK 73-4345-569-92 21e.00 '••-CKS 8.25 WRIGH: HENN E:FCTRIC UTILITIES O1-4324-249-42 8.25 - '•'-CKS I20.00 AELE LIABILITY REPT LIABILITY REPORT 01-1210-129-31 120.00 - 18./8 CONSOLIDATED ELECT SWITCH KITS 73-1:12-589-92 1/./1 70,51 IONN BECKMAN REPAIR CEILING O1-1313-099-17 397.50 30HN BECKMAN PAINT/INSTALL CABNT 01-4343-099-17 468.01 • 135.80 HARRIS WMSE i CANVAS CANVAi 01-4232-249-42 135.10 - 306.00 MA30R APPL PICKUP APPL PICKUP FALL 01-4348-249-42 306.00 30. 00 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS MEMBERSHIP 01-4390-174-33 30,00 - 1919 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE 317007 11/08/89 317908 11/08/89 317910 11/08/49 317611 11/08/19 317912 11/08/29 317013 11/01/89 317915 11/08/80 317916 11/08/69 317917 .1/04/81 317918 11/01/81 317919 11/08/tl CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 43.75 LAKEWAY CLEANERS CLEAN BLANKETS 43.75 71.22 RIVERSIDE PUBLISHING TEST FORMS 71.22 027.95 SUNWOOD INN SEMINAR/LODGENG 027.95 091.00 TCS ENTE4PRISES AMMO 991.00 300.00 ULI URBAN LAND INST MEMBERSHIP 100 00 289.41 CLEMENTS ASSOCIATES SOIL S.MPiE AUGER 209.41 1,322.00 G 6 S CABINETS 1,322.00 25.00 NELSON DAVID 25.00 317.01 CENTURY SIGN 387.01 7.522.00 NSP 7.522,00 29.00 KAREN NITZ 29.00 17.803.21 FUND 01 TOTAL 3.083.41 FUND 10 TOTAL 995.40 FUND 20 TOTAL 10.537 70 FUND 26 TOTAL 19.664.39 FUND 72 TOTAL 2,011.43 FUND 73 TOTAL 3,251.72 FUND 70 TOTAL 126.347.26 TOTAL ACCTG/MALLIN COURT APPEAR LABEL PINS/MWCG ELEC SERV LIFT STAIN RFD OVERPYMNT 11-13-89 PAGE 12 ACCOUNT N0. INV. 0 P.O. 1 MESSAGE 01-4342-120-31 01-4322-129-31 0, 4356-129-31 01-4232-129-31 01-6390-174-33 14-4560-632-00 01-4343-099-17 01-4306-129-31 01-2025-000-00 26-4531-434-82 73-LLSL-000-00 GENERAL FUND IMPROVE 6 EOUIP OUTLAY F PERM IMPROVE REVOLVING F 1909 SMR-WTR CONSTR FUND WATER OPERATING FUND SEWER OPERATING FUND GOLF COURSE OPERATING FD •••-CKS •---CKS •---CKS 102089.2 )o TOz '.ayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: October 20, 1989 COUNCIL MEETING NOV 13 1989 CITY OF ORM SUBJECT: 1990 Budget Information Attachment: A. Fund Balance Projection Information for 12/90 B. Tax Capacity Shift Example C. Minnesota Tax System D. 1990 Budget Preliminary Resolution Dated 8/14/89 E. Proposed Resolution Establishing the Preliminary Maximum Levy F. Truth is Taxation Bearing Schedule ISSUE - 1. Presentation of Fund Balance projections for the year ending December 1990 as an aid during budget discussions. 2. Presentation of approximate budget timeframe for Council for 1990 Budget. 3. Provide the Council with updated information on the impact of the 1990 Budget following the special session. 4. Presentation of an overview of the Minnesota property tax system. 5. Adoption of preliminary maximum levy for publication. 6. Set a public hearing date. INTRODUCTION - As a result of the special Legislative session the C tyT rs 6uaget process needs to be modified for the balance of the year. In addition, at the budget meeting held on September 27, 1989, Councilmembers requested an update for the Fund projections through the and of 1990. DISCUSSION - Issue 41 - Fund Balance - The fund projections present estimates of where the City will be with each of the funds through the end of 1990. These projections do not take into account estimated fund uses during 1990 for the Capital Budget. The updated capital budget estimates that. The reason it is not Included, is in part, the uncertanty as to which of these projects will go ahead during the year. (In advance of the discussion on the facilities on November 8, 1989, a summary of fund sources available for building was presented to the Council.) The primary reason the Fund Balancx information was requested by Council was to ensure strong financial stability of the organization should the City go ahead with the facilities. Consideration of building the fund reserve will be considered In 1 the financing options for the facilities. Issue 42 - Budget Schedule - As for a schedule in order to meet t e nea�zequ rements the following schedule is setforth: Monday, October 23rd - Receive Revised Aid and Levy Limit figures :rom the State Monday, November 13th - New Tax Levy Preliminary Resolution (regular Council mecting) Wednesday, November 15th- Submit resolution to County Recommend - Hold public Budget hearing (Recommended date November 30, 7:00 pm) Monday, December llth - Adopt Budget (Tentative) Thursday, December 28th - Last day to certify to County Issue 43 - Special Session IIm a�ct - Based on the new Levy Limits an�Stafe Ai3-TI-gurea E e l "u Budget is currently being revised. The initially projected total for the property tax levy plus State Aids is equal to the newly allowed levy for property taxes as theState is taking all the local State Aid from the City. Pre Special Session (a) Post Special Session Projected Property Tax Levy 1,413,944 1,585,546 State Aids 171,600 -0- 1,585,544 1,585,546 a.) 1990 Budget Page III The impact of zhe 3.4% shift from the City to the School District is as follows: Orono Estimated Tax Capacity $13,848,122 3.4% Shift .034 Total Shift from City to School T—UTI-W District This shift comes from the City's Local Government Aid ol,.s its Homestead and Agricultural Credit and (HACA) Orono Local Government Aid $ 171,798 Orono Estimated HAr!A 306,021 T--Ufl-s" The 'HACA" Shift is not seen by the City but would be a reduction to the homeowner on the rroperty tax statement. The property 2 owner should not see a rise because of the shift because the monies are transferred as aid to the school districts and their local effort 'mill rate" (i.e. tax capacity rate) is reduced from 29.1% to 26.4%. (See Attachment B.) Since the City loses all of its State Aids and NACA, there is no longer a penalty for exceeding its levy limit. As exceeding the limits however would still be illegal it is an option but not a recommended one. Issue 94 - Minnesota's Property Tax SUst�em - Attachment C is a g rapl-i is repcesanta�.o o M nnesota s rather complicated property tax system. It illustrates the pre session and post session changes. This will be "explained" during the budget eview process. Issue #5 - reliminary Resolution Adoption - The special session T—eTsf—ature requlced a opt on of a new evy resolution as the figures changed. This is the n:+mber to be published in the ad required to be in the paper as a result of the Truth in Taxation. The resolution is required to be transmitted to the County by 11/15. While the total dollars to the City increases by 18.5%, the shift causes the levy to increase by 10.3%. This is about a 1.8% overall increase to the taxpayer, 1.01 which will be offset by monies to reduce the School district levy. The City retains the option to reduce from the maximum that is established or amend where the money is spent. Issue t6 - Scheduling Public Nearing - As part of the Truth in Taxation, the C ty s requrreed to establish both a public bearing date and a reconvening date that does not coincide with other overlapping taxing jurisdictions such as the Cuunty and various school districts. Given that the regular Council meeting nights of 11/27 and 12/11 are already taken by school districts, other nights must be scheduled. (Tt: County gave the County and school districts first choice. O:,ce they were established, then the County sent Attachment F to let cities establish theirs. Suggested dates include: November 30, 1989, 7:00 p.m. Cscember 12, 1989, 7:00 p.m. Reconvene if necessary (The reconveining date is required to be established even if not used.) The hearings together with final resolution adoption must he completed and transmitted to the County ty 12/28/89.) ALTERNATIVES 1. Accept the information. 2. Make an} comments applicable. 3. Table discussion until facilities and/or further budget meetings. 4. Adopt the resolution as presented. 5. Amend and adopt the resolution. 6. Establish a date for public hearing and the reconvening. 7. Table to 11/27. P:=MMENDATION - It is recommended that after the Council has as,59 any questions and made any comments that they adopt the preliminary resolution and establish November 30, 1989, 7:00 p.m. for the public hearing date and December 12, 1989, 7:00 p.m. for the reconvening date. PROP(JED MOTION - Moved by seconded by , tt t the Council adopt the preliminary resolu7on and establis-FNo fiber 30, 1989, 7:00 p.m. for the public hearing date and D=cenae: 12, 1989, 7:00 p.m. for the reconvening date. Ayes _, Nays _. cc: Department Heads 101989. CrCITY CADW ESIM-WED FUND BAIANCE/MMUN ED MMWN(S 1?-31-90 SPECIAL R VENOE FUNDS General Cammunity Imp. 6 uu ng Fund Iark Development Equip O/L Cap. O/L Fund Balance 12/31/88 3,265,458 121,999 -0- 267,992 149,385 Est. Revenues 1989 2,823,525 17,000 14,550 21,640 42,300 Est. Expenditures 1989 2,661,025 — 14,590 123,210 7,350 Transfers in 1989 — — — 49,200 2,025,000 Transfer Out 1989 2,418,361 — — Fund Balance 12/31/89 1,009,597 138,999 -0- 215,502 2,V^9," Est. Revenues 1990 2,924,010 20,300 14,470 24,860 30,000 Est. Expenditures 1990 2,865,310 680 14,470 106,100 — Transfers In 1"0 — — — 58,700 — Tranafers Out 1990 _58,700 Fund Balance 12/31/90 !.,009,597 158,619 -0- 192,962 2,239,335 E1ed Balance Dedicated for Voc/Severence i18,500 Ondesignated 901,097 Estimated Need for rash Flow - 1991 - 720,000 101989.3 CITY OF Oleo ESVIMV7''. FUND SAIANI--/REMINED EARNINGS 12-31-90 DEBT SERVICE. EVNDS T91T- 1966-76 1980 1982 1985 Svr-Wtr Imp Each Imp Sad Imp Hord Inip Bad Rev Boric Fad Balance 12/31/88 658,310 492,688 205,129 143,388 -0- Rot. Revenues 1989 82,800 96,600 15,650 91,150 * 506,175 Not. Expenditures 1989 173,140 12.1,740 68,270 108,590 -0- Transfers In 1989 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- Transfer Out 1989 -0- -o- -0- -0- -0- Fed Balance 12/31/89 567,970 467,548 152,509 125,948 506,175 Bat. Revoues 1990 79,500 117,650 14,000 90,780 36,250 Est. Expenditures 1990 164,310 1.15,960 40,360 105,4CO 128,231 Transfers In 1990 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- Transfers Out 1"0 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- Fad Balance 12/31/90 483,160 469,23E 126,149 111,328 414,194 1999 Bad Proceeds (Capitalized Interest) Anticipated Surplus Upon Bad Fund Closeout $315,000 $230,000 (year available) (1991) (1996) * 370,000 2 101989.3 CITY Cr ON= ESTIEAIM FUND BALANCE/FEMIN D FAWINGS 12-31-90 (UNBMGF.'IID) CAPITAL P14J.M= MMS 989 Muni^ Perm Imp Swc-Wtr State Aid Revolving Improve Fund Balance 17/31/88 3,519 (81,357) -0- Est. Revenues 3a89 190,000 56,700 *1,942,750 Est. Expenditures 1989 3,519 25,000 803,000 Transfers In 1989 -0- 534,161 -0- Transfer Out 1989 190,000 -0- Fnad Balance 12/31/89 -0- 484,504 1,139,750 Est. Revenues 1990 10,000 73,760 45,600 Est. Expenditures 1990 -0- 36,200 1,122,000 Transfers In 1990 -0- 10,000 -0- Transfa's Out 1990 10,000 -0- -0- Fund Balance 12/31/90 -0- 531,984 63,350 Dedicated for Road/Bridge Projects 143,750 Dedicated for Mergencien 372,850 Dndesignated 15,384 ��• 1989 Bad Proceeds for Construction *1,920,397 Amount Available from State 426,960 1/1/89 Estimate as of 12/31/90 607,000 Depends an ESA projects •mom in 1990 (see Capital Budget) 101989.3 CITY OF 0x47a': ESTIMATM FUND BAIANCZ/RETAIINMD EMNINGS 12-31-90 OPERATING FUNDS WATER SEWER GOLF Retained Earnings 12/31/88 127,195 943,738 31,944 Eat Revenues 1989 156,700 463,220 105,750 Est Expenses 1989 (1) 159,670 302,770 95,830 Net Depreciation -op 1989 3,900 2,550 3,130 Transfers In 1989 -0- -0- -0- Transfers Out 19+9 -0- -0- -0- Retained ! ings 12/31/89 120,325 1,101,638 38,734 Est Revenues -990 166,900 479,040 115,800 Est Expenses 1990 (2) 187,030 324,580 94,710 Net Depreciation -Op 1990 5,200 4,450 4,110 Transfas In 1990 -0- -0- -0- Transfers Out 1990 -0- -0- -0- Retained Earnings 12/31/90 94,995 1,251,648 55,714 Est. Cash 12/31/90 82,300 679,150 1,250 (1) Capital expenditures excluded 6,960 11,450 4,900 (2) Capital expenditures excluded 1,180 67,470 8,400 EXAMPLE SPECIAL SESSION TAR SHIFT ------------------------- 1989 Est. TAX Capacity Shift Percentage SHIFT TOTAL Projected Property Tax Levy Local Govt ASd TOTAL LEPY UNIT BASE , Property Tax Levy Homestead L AgriCredit (MCA) TOTAL TO TAXPAYERS TAX CAPACITY SHIFT $13,200,000 (Aescmee City f School District Boundaries/Property Owner the Same) 3.40 City 103ea School ------------ (3.19) District $450,000 from receives 3.41 LGA $ BACA, ($/50,000) as Gains levy aide $150,000 equal to State Aid loss. Per Special Session Poet Special Session ........................................................ School School City District City District ____________________________ 1,300,000 5,000,000 1,500.000 51000,000 (local effort) 200,000 - - (350,000)(reduction in local effort) ____________________________________________ 1,500,OOc 5,000,000 11500,000 4,550,000 1,300,000 5,000,000 1,500,000 4,550,000 250,000 1,000,000 - _ 1,00D_000 --- ---`----------------------- 1,050,000 4,000,000 11500,000 3,550,000 51050,000 51050,000 ............ .............. IAQ1Ml bn�u n i41 � >m � nw, ��nwuaSa r Sew \i.a. c� -Lx tua oxo . i lLtn t%la � ♦ rN 3.r / i�P.... % ATE. J S[isilNlJl (HNC Qni.. !1� I(.n Po.,.+ [a++,' S,y.rt� Wa4 VsH 9.sn Q4 1'tRwps,u.., +.wuTr 0..laL., inw.(ye W ir.t� .jyl (tJ0(. ws.Nvu nwu:. 81089.. City of ORONI RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL a NO. 2672 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PROPOSED 1989 TAX LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 1990 BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, that the following sums of money be levied for the current year, collectible in 1990 upon the taxable property in the City of Orono, for the following purposes: For the General Fund $1,426,710 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Improvement Bonds of 1985 Debt Redemption Fund Levy of $35,000 for 1990 adopted September 28, 1988 by Resolution #2507 is hereby ordered collected. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Improvement Bonds of 1980 Debt Redemption Fund Levy of $17,700 for 1990 adopted November 20, 1980 by Resolution #1228 is hereby ordered collected. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Final Proposed 1989 Tax Levy Collectible in 1990 is calculated using existing law and, and as such, this amount will be affected by, and is subject to, any changes the State Legislature may make during a special legislative session. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this levy is subject to possible reduction by the City Council at a public budget hearing date (as yet unspecified). Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held August 1.4, 1989. n ATT S-: Jam I R. Grabek, _. orothy M9 allin, City Clerk A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PROPOSED 1989 TAI LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 1990 BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, that the following sums of money be levied for the current year, collectible in 1990 upon the taxable property in the City of Orono, for the following purposes: For the General Fund $1,585,546 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Improvement Bonds of 1985 Debt Redemption Fund Levy of $35,000 for 1990 adopted September 28, 1988 by Pesolution 92507 is hereby ordered collected. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Improvement Bonds of 1980 Debt Redemption Fund Levy of $17,700 for 1990 adopted November 20, 1980 by Resolution t1228 is hereby ordered collected. BE IT FUT 7HER RESOLVED, that this levy is subject to possible reduceion by the City Council at the Dublic budget hearing. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held November 13, 1989. ATTEST: James R. Grabek, Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAX AND PUBU A607 Government Center Minneapolis, Minnesota HENNE%N Crossroads To service October 30, 1989 Mayor James A. Grabek City of Orono 1335 Brown Road South P. o. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Mayor Grabek: A77�aoevrr- As required by the Truth in Taxation legislation, we are notifying you of the following budget hearing dates that have been set: Meeting Reconvening Date Time Date Time Hennepin County 11-17-89 5:30 p.m. 11-18-89 9:30 p.m. Intermediate District 287 12-14-89 7:00 p.m. School District 276 12-4-89 8:00 P.M. 12-18-89 8:00 P.M. School District 277 11-27-89 7:00 p.m. 11-29-89 7:00 p.m. School District 278 12-11-89 7:30 p.m. 12-14-89 7:30 p.m. School District 284 11-27-89 7:00 p.m. 12-11-89 7:00 P.M. Metropolitan Council and Regional Transit Board held their meetings in September. As the new legislation does not affect them, they will not be holding another meeting. we are now requesting that you set your city's dates and times for the original budget hearing and for a reconvened hearing. Although the Department of Revenue suggests that meetings be held after the preliminary tax levy is certified on November 15, as long as the dates you select do not conflict with the above dates and tiles, any date prior to December 28 may be used. Your final property tax levy must be certified to our office no iater than December 28, 1989. Please notify our office in writing of the dates and tiaes you have selected. f you have soy questions, please contact Marie Rrmze at 348-5100. S ce sly, Dale G. o d, Dir for Property Tax and Publco HENNEPIN COUNTY DGF:sw an equol oppGnuney Qmricycr TAX CAPACITY SHIFT EXAMPLE SPECIAL SESSION TAX SHIFT ------------------------- 1909 Nat. Tax Capacity $13,200,000 (Assumes City a School District Boundaries/Property Owner the Same) Shift Percentage 3- City loses School -----_-st (3.41) District $450,000 from receives 3.4% LGA a NACA, (SI50,000' ae Gains levy aids 09IR TOTAL $450,000 equal to State Aid lase. Per Special Session Post Special Session ........................................................ School School v City District City District Projected Property Tax Lary 1,300,000 5,000.000 11500,000 5,000,000 (local effort) Local 0ovt Aid 200.000 - - (450,000)(reduction in local effort) TOTAL LEVY LIMIT BASE -------------------------------------------------------- 11500,000 51000,000 1,500,000 41550,000 �y M1 Property Tax Levy 1,300,000 5,000,000 1,500,000 41550,000 Homestead f AgriCredit (RAM) 250,000 1,000,000 - 1,000.000 --- ---------------------------------------------------- 11050,000 41000,000 11500,000 31550,000 TOTAL TO TAXPAYERS 5-50,000 ........... 51050,000 ............... 10689.1HD To: Mark E. Bernhardsor., City Administrator Pry: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works DirectoffOUNCIL MEETING Date: November 6, 1989 NOV 13 1989 Subject: Review Previous Action Tax Forfeit Lands CITY OF ORONO In 1979 the City of Orono received notice from Hennepin County of tax forfeit lands in the City. The normal procedure was to determine whether or not the land could be used for public purposes. After review it was determined to release P.I.D. #07- 117-23 23 0013 for public sale by Resolution #1046. Recently a representative of the Fairview Covenant Church has requested the City rescind their previous action and designate the land for park and recreation use. The Fairview Church owns land adjacent to this parcel but do not have funds to purchase the property. Reco"endation - To refer this matter to the Park Commission for their review of the request and to report back to the Council. Proposed Motion - Moved by _, seconded by , To refer this matter to the Park Commission for the review of the request and to report tack to the Council. Ayes _, nays _ To: Mayor Grabek s Orono Council Members From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Forwarded recommending approval. OVENANT CHURCH 1175 County Road 19 Mound. MN 55364 Oct. 17, 1989 To: Crono City Council p�c�ad� g718� C�, Regarding: Lot 6 Berquist a aficklund's ._ddition. to derquist a dicklund's Park ( Jtate Land Jeyt. ;r 33 07 117 23 23 OC13 j which Jeaine :.. ,al:usza to her letcer of Oct.11, 1989 has advised us to acquire. Dear Council rlembers: Our church has been maintaining a recreational area including a field for playing soft -ball and Little League baseball for approximately 25 years. This area is lot 7 and is adjacent to the above described property. We hereby request that you recind your previous action of putting lot 6 up for public sale and thereafter take action to declare lot 6 an unbuildable lot. Thereby in accordance with 1988 i11. Statutes 282.01 Subdivision 7 A allowing it only to be purchased by adjacent land owners or have it remain the property of the City of Orono for public use only. Trusting that ,you will act favorably in this regard please call Jeff Strand ( 348-3734 ) to remove the property from public sale. Thank you. CoZUally.in Christ Irecrerick W. Abrahamson, Chmn, JOH11 MILL=R ..Waator 472 3128 ' F CCUb1Y AU DIf OR,) rr :, ... ,,,, j •.- Hatiu fi [ipiralion of Redempli� ;r nr ^r•. �. •ern .,,, ..:. ••r r r•.. N.m r:.. n...r /.. .. 1.. Pl:nn •.I.. ••+m 4+A /•:J.s A•. Itr .ror nr Ibr _ __ _ 1 ah _ .:;T el ._ `iaY _ _ ., _. P _73 .. n Ib u. /sJbwrM • •.Ps ,nr .n h. rla vr. l•_ 12_ .9r •.rt Mdn,.nr•a 'rr a/::slier alrir /:firy • ,-/a.)r/Pry ne p+n.drJ!•.1.r.Ilrfan•mr.•^�:.rrnna. drarn; non el aril luoh o/rle+s+e, -4 ...n. ro ao+ rFr as-:r mr +vraar/ Au b,w p.r. J m .. a//irr arb;r<I re r.bliv ln.F.rrie•� ., n- .:•.JI•) Inr. Wayne A. Johnson. Co.,, A.Alse n.,d .SePLmbef.25.—)f J8_ . •:n Of FIC1 0/ THC COUNTY AUDITOR. ,,. Nftin of EaPlnlbadRdmPtHa,:^',.ill,% STATF OF MIAAFaOTA _ ?I4 •d' Ts dl Prrunr inmenN in Jr l..J, bnrin.(b. Jr.•,nbrL Yen en b•dby .erf/:r/ MI Ib, P.w d, e/ b.r/ b,,v..(m /rse.rb.L si0:•I*/ is rb Gsry N . i I l.... Pis _..TIM* of AlinvNl4 err* bid is (s• IA, Am. en Ibr late •li•: ,yy,,AA Jsr e/ Nay ff 13 . as ra, I.. /.da. q ,.f* of ran//s• /disar,•f m** /fr . iitot74S Ib yen 972 — IbI A* /nrnpion, e/ nff p.rcdr eeJ Ibr :rwu e/ ILr Paw aariaA•laa!(•�a.�Y'T,'-'} �• -nnvL •wpertla+lY r.ru /el!•r,: "" .e .•s .r.a.ue oris Malin Etal Bergquist and Wiekiunds Addition to Bergquist and Wicklunds Park Hennepin County Minresota 4im - 'n City of Orono• ' District 38, Plat 41"0. Parcel 6000- ,'`�t{ri 'kqq.,,• 2277 /• ?Am d. Lw.1 •./eons. M ,aid l�J. l.- uJ ..f. ru .*. bo Jsi/aa . w.IJi. y�rr., ofti ft ' /ilig NP-1 M..N isnNfI*** F.e,i/./ y/sue ++,!'. ttii a r iin.....y b../. J.Urr:.l...nar, 25th_yy a/�M•arrbar rf ..ils.S•' mmlid sell Warne A. Johnsmi Cns.OAaIiM ,T Gordon C. Ram .o;^, a t _Wayne A. Johns" , C.wy Asiw */ - NeMla rww lllos.ose, w .y re•rr/y ,how Wa is a 0. �,y N d+ P.M:,aM ..tlo wda/ aNMsa/rtlea a -= Pare//•. feblir iny.rrrw is qs/r. A`�JoMsolli Cs on ArAw•'tti;. o.I./ 5eetefber 25. _/f �.0__ nr oA-.. IL lolem%T.- -44 IL, .0 r `�3SOb _ G� _>2�✓ Lu 94 4 � - ---top- 4%7G.'SS &Mub f � � r m 41786.3 TO: .lark Bernhardson, City Administrator PROM: Dorothy Hallin, City Clerk DAT::: April 17, 1986 SUBJECT: Request For Tax Forfeit Property to Be Taken For City Park I received a request from Dick CtArba, who represents Fairview Covenant Church, 1175 Court•y :Road 19 in Minnetrista. He i.s requesting that the City of Orono take ownership of Lot 5, Bergquists and Wicklunds Addition (PID 07--117-23 23 0013) for park purposes. This lot adjoins property that the church owns in the City of Orono. He stated the property is for sale over the counter at Hennepin County for $20,000. When asked why the church does not purchase the property, he stated that the church is not in a financial position to purchase tt. Droperty. The church would not be able to meet payments tha County will accept over a 10 year period. He stated that use as a City owned park would be consistent with their property. They currently have a ball diamond and parking area on the adjacent lot, on the north side of this let. This property was released for public sale on Resolution 41046 dated June 12, 1979. There are l3,760.29 in unpaid assessments on this lot. Interceptor Sewer - Levy 3302 - $ 35.76 Lateral Sewer - Levy 5382 - 3,159.16 Storm Sewer - Levy 6660 - 565.37 TOTAL ASSESSMENTS �S3r7 0. F9 There is no background material regarding this lot in the file to indicate what extent any research was done in 1979 regarding use of this lot. The lateral sewe- was assessed on footagr and unit basis indirating it could be a .uildable lot. A map of the area and a copy of Resolution 41046 is attached for your review. b6ph,o 4-167.0] CUFTY ®T ®II ONO VW lnnn au. 66ecry,Yt Bey. Minn,wY }iTD• NunKipi nln.s On the Nwth Shen of Lake Minnetonka July 17, 1979 Hennepin County Finance Division Attn: Tea porfelted Land Unit 603 Administrative Tower Nenntp.n County Government Center tl3 nneapolie, Minnesota 53407 Door Sirs: The City of Orono would "heto certify the amounts TOM a3 nIng unpaid. on the oraginel asset cmanta, Loou�eattl ce, proa ties doaignv•od as tax forfot au :ands by y ,eeordlnq to the attached cap/ of. :.i -ualutf en Y1046. V olyeIny HoU in Assessment Clark , Resolution Ito. 1016 TAX FORFEITED LANDS PELEASED FOR PWLIC SALE WHERSCS, The City of Orono is a municipal corporation organi';ed and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and 1tHERERS, p�suant to Minnesota Statutes 282, the City has received from Hennepin County a list of lands within the City which have become the property of the State of Minnesota for non-payment of real estate taxes; and wpEREAS, the Hennepin County Board of Commi.-.sionera have classi- fied said lands as non,-donsOrvotion land and have authorized the 5310 of each such parcel of land subject to levier and release by the City; and x'HER..AS, the City COpi.cil has reviewed said lands for eomplionoe with local toning ordinances, for the tpossible amount / t outstanding assess ments remaining unpaid to the City, by the City as authorised by the Statutes. NCA, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVID, that the City Council of the City of, Orono, pursuant to MinnosOte Statutes 282, hereby approves .ha classification of oath of Leo fcliewing „arcels of land as non- consarvation land, and furtherMOre approves the public Dale of each Weal of land as listed below. Release of these lands by t2)0 City Council does not constitutO an ise. assurance that each parcel is or will be approved as r. g All parcels remain subject to all applicable toning c;-:"I.-us provi- sions, including those regulations providing for sinimus lot area and minimum lot width. Substandard parcels may be useable only in combination with other adjoining parc0l(0). ti ect he that se ou st andingese �pOcielOassessmentsishell bejpaidt ins fullt ithe City upon return to privets Ownership. Any amount not reccvered at the time of solo shall be subject to reassessment by the City. Pit NO. 1046 ^a>: FE.z:eito-d ].ands re7c�«d For Public Sale Fa3e 2 PANCEI$ BEL!;_45>D FOA StiLE �naunt Df Plat ?a �_ee?, PID 17-117-23-22-0006 t.�vi 3302 Out_ anding $ 12.45 333 41317 3600 4048 624.00 4049 100.00 5383 957.00 6000 07-117-73-23-0013 3302 $ 35.76 38 41980 5382 3,159.16 6660 565.37 07-117-23-23-0015 3302 25.80 30 42000 2210 5382 700.00 ' 6660 482.18 2400 07-117-23-23-0016 17.60 813.34 38 42000 5382 6660 225.13 42000 2600 07-117-23-23-0017 3302 19.80 910.04 33 5302 ' 6660 266.22 07-117-23-23-0019 3302 22.00 38 42000 2800 5382 998.59 6660 208.29 e`^..y000:;_`:x:4950..: ..... :17�117r23-3:^•-OOi} 5-=2 J •... J 1l sop3., . 'i77ty7-�3=z2sg2s. _ 400.00 42280 52C0 08-117-23-33-0070 40 9 100.00 . 33 08-117-'t3-33-0077 3302 10.56 .93 '42280 8000 5383 2,660.32 4000 07-117-23-44.-0040 5383 1.309.64 38 42300 02-317-23-31-0021 . 38 42560 3900 02-127-21-31 -003Q na specials 30 42560 5200 031 no specials •36 02560 5300 02-117-23-31-0034 no specials 30 42560 5600 �.� �a,�;�._.. -----`.... �:u.�r_wreal.a^A7-..,.t..•z±:.a:..4..,,r.e'...R�a.nA16n i41 38 - 43500 38 43640 .4800 21-117-�a-•s-......0 5382 •2..311.33 5383 2.640.24 5020 07-117-23-31-0033 3302 67.76 5383' 2,916.74 20-117-23-43-0037 4040 480•00 3600 5383 673.S0 t Tt . _ ,. .try-�fi!((�f.2"}}�.,7•. Tax or: siFor fei ted Lanes n^leased For Public Sale Paec 3 ndonted by t*r� City Council eaCity oa the Of orono on this 12th day of June, 1979 by a vote of ____es -- 0 R. Den n, city Admins aloz �' �--- :Fwal' t"o13 3. %Ijas'sen 0aal a, Acting ayor a 11689.8 / TO: Mayor and City Council COUNCIL MEETING Al FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City 9dministcatoe , NOV 13 1989 DATE: November 6, 1989 CITY OF ORONO SUBJECT: Stubbs Bay Sewer Attachment: A. Stubbs Bay Sewer Memo Dated 10/6/89 ISSUE - Consideration of issues outlined in Attachment A. INTRODUCTION - The attached memo was presented to Council at t e r -October 23, 1989 meeting, but was tabled at that time. It is requested that the Council review Attachment A and discuss its issues and concerns regarding it at the Council meeting. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by _, that the Council after having discussed this issue direct staff on the issues outlined in Attachment A. Ayes _, Nays cc: John R. Gerhardson, Public works Director Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning a Zoning Administr-.tor Gienn Cook, City Engineer 1 10689.3HD To: Mayor Grabek 6 Orono Council Members From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato Data: October 6, 1989 Subject: Consideration of Issues - Stubbs Bay Sewering Date Attachments - A - Stubbs Bay Memo dated 9/14/89 Issue - 1. Discussion of issues tabled at the meeting of September 28, 1989. 2• Establishment of a meeting for Stubbs Bay with the residents. Introduction - As a follow-up to the City staff's July 27, 1989 meeting with residents from the Stubbs Bay area, Attachment A was prepared. Discussion - Attachment A outlines the primary issues for the Council to consider and have developed responses in advance of any meeting with the residences. The issues as noted in Attachment A includes: Issue fl: A. Inclusion of other areas 1. Oxford Road 2. Sussex 3. Cygnet B. City funding any reserve charge C. Potential rezoning D. Level of required support/interest by area Issue 42: E. Next meeting date j�� Stubbs Hay Sewer October 6, 1989 Page 2 of 2 Alternatives - Issue fl - Discussion of issue: a) Discuss and develop direction; b) Table for further consideration; c) Take no action. Issue #2 - Establishment of date: a) Set a date; b) Table. Rec—endation It is recommended that following discussion, the Council direct staff to develop policies/direction in relation to each of these and that once the policies have been developed, that a meeting be established with the neighbors and Council members to discuss these issues and other potential issues related to potential sewering of the Stubbs Hay area. Proposed Notion - Moved by _, seconded by the Council, after discussing the issues, give staff direction for development of policy responses for each of these items with a letter sent to the affected owners regarding the level of support requited prior to further consideration cf the matter by the Council. Ayes _ nays cc; Dept Heads Michael Gaffran COUNCIL METING SEP 2 5 1989 TO: Mayor Grabek Orono City Councilmembers CITY OF ORONO PROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrats DATE: September 14, 1989 SUBJ: Stubbs Say Sewer Attachments Stubbs Bay Sewer Memo-8/17/89 ISSUE - 1. Presentat'on of information to Council related to primary issues raised at the Stubbs Bay Meeting held July 27, 1989. 2. Establish a date for the next Stubbs Bays meeting which would be with interested residents of the area and the Council. INTRODUCTION - At theCouncil's August 28, 1989 Council Meeting, Attachment A was presented outlining significant issues related to the Stubbs Bay newer that had been raised at the July Meeting. DISCUSSION - saue - outline of Major issues A. Inclusion of other areas _ 1. Oxford Road - This area was developed at the 2-acre lakeshore stanTa-r-C =978. While sewer could be extended to thin area an estimate for this extension has not been made. mere are 11 properties in this subdivision and presently there is only one septic system that has had intermittent problems. The Oxford Road area is in part lakeshore property and this may have special consideration as to whether or not it is included in the sewer project. 2. Sussex Development - This is presently being proposed for ed vetopment. It sat a 2-acre density for a total of 17 residential lots. The topography of this area may make it expensive to sewer this area as it would need either a deep gravity line or a lift station line into the Stubbs Bay sewer to feed into the proposed ^tubbs Bay system. 3. Cgneett Place - This area contains 19 developed lots which are pre oina d mtely z/3 - 1 acre. it is an area the City may look at for an alternative waste management study in the next 5 years. Topography may make severing this area expensive. Also there are another 6 lots in between the Stubbs Bay area and Cygnet that could also be looked at. In order to include any of these in the development, the City would need to make a request for MUSA line extension. (Although the Stubbs Bay area is currently not within the MUSA 1 line, it was id=ntified as an area that could be expanded in the City s,C.mpretrvnsive Management Plan.) The impact of adding these units would be an effort to reduce the cost to the existing 82 residential developed lots and the approximate 10 additional potentially buildable vacant lots. The inclusion of Sussex would reduce the cost approximately 15% of the trunk costs or about 7-10% of the overall. Oxford would reduce the per unit trunk cost about 12% and about 6-81 of the total per unit cost. Cygnet Place would reduce the per unit trunk cost by 21% and the total by 10-121. I£ these were not included at this time, there is enough capacity in the line to allow for their connection in the future. This would probably be done as a combination of an assessment together with a connection charge into the main. B. City Funding of Any Reserve Charge - As noted in t`:e first item, there will be additional capacity of approximately 250+ units in this line which will be constructed at the minimum size. These together could reduce the total cost by about 25%. As an alternative for each $100,000.00 in reserve capacity the City would take would result in about $1,000.00 per property reduction of those currently in the Stubbs Bay area. (About an 98 reduction in the total cost which ranges from $11,-16,000). If the City chooses not to fund any portion of the sewer the City may face a forced reduction of special assessments resulting from the appeals process. Obviously this could be limited by requiring a certain percentage of appeal waivers to be signed prior to the project being undertaken. Potential Rezoning - This area was o.iginally zoned 1 acre and prior to 1975 and when the new standards came in was placed at a 2-acre zoning. The issue is whether the City would consider rezoning the properties in the area to 1 acre (or less) if sewer did come in. The advantage to the property owner is in part to reduce the number of variances that they would need to obtain permits to improve their property, together with allowing some property owners the ability to subdivide their property and to help finance the sewer project. It should be remembered, however, that additional units would have to pay an amount substantially similar in the currently projected figures so there may not be that much gained in subdivision. The related issue is the fact that the City has not done any rezoning in the Crystal Bay area or any other 2 acre zone areas sewered since the 1975 rezoning. In the Crystal Bay area those served by sewers would remain substandard lots even under the 1-acre zoning and therefore there would be few if any lots that would be able to be subdivided. In the Stubbs Bay area there are approximately 9 2-plus acre properties that could subdivide into an additional 9 lots. This -- - - 2 --. would reduce the overall cost by 101. D. Level of Support - The assumption on the Stubbs Bay projer . been that the Council would require a certain level of support as expressed in waiver of assessment prior to undertaking the project. These waivers of assessment initially would express the 'top end" over which any amount over that (apart from capitilized interest) would require that new waivers be signed. Due to the nature of the area, it -a recommended that a certain percentage of the property owners in the current area sign waivers prior to taking further steps in the process. Not having a certain level of assessment waiver, prior to the date that the project is ordered, would place the City at risk for the special assessment portion being appealed. (The staff is recommending a special assessment level that would not be that much greater than the Crystal Bay area fi.�ally was assessed), but this does not insure that this would not be appealed or reduced.) Issue 2 - Next. Stubbs Bay meeting it would be appropriate that the meeting be held in November/December in order for construction to be done next year. In advance of that however, the City could communicate to the residents that they would have to circulate among themselves a petition and get a minimum percentage of persons interested in undertaking the project. The City could request that the assessment waivers be signed prior to the ordering of the project. Once the petition is submitted, the Council could have a specia' meeting to address the questions raised and take any additi l questions from the neighbors. ALTERNATIVES Issue 1 - 1. Take a position of the Council on each of the items. 2. Table for further discussion. 3. Take no action at this time. Issue 2 - 1. Establish a meeting date. 2. Await establishing a date until after a petition is received. 3. Direct staff to send a letter regarding the level of support needed. 3 RECOMMENDA-ION - It isrecommendedthat staff send a letter affected property owners indicating the tentative meeting date in December, but that a petition signing an assessment waiver at the 60% level of property owners interested in the project must be received prior to a meeting being held. PROPOSED MOTION Moved by , seconded by , that Council direct staff to send a letter to the abutting property owners outlining the Level of support needed in order for the Council and City to further consider this as a project. Ayes , Nays - CC: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building a Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, Planning s Zonining Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director Glenn Cook, City Engineer 81739.11 TO: Mayor and City Council . RiM: :.ark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato DATE: August 17, 1989 SUBJECT: bb's Bay Sewer Meeting Attachment: A. Stubb's Bay Sewer Meeti;,g Questions and Answers ISSUE - 1. Presentation of information regarding the Stubb's Bay meeting held July 27, 1989. 2. Establishment of a date for the next Stubb's Bay meeting. INTRODUCTION - At the informational meeting held July 27, 1989, a ,,m6,r-,F questions wer raised. Attachment A was prepared to summarize the questions and answers given at that meeting. In addition, a number of residents of the area who were interested in furthering the development of a sewer desire to -tave a meeting as soon a possible. DISCUSSION - It is hoped that a meeting regarding Stubb's Bay would again be held in November and at that time the City would be able to respond to questions that were not able to be addressed at the July 27th meeting. Significant questions to be responded to are: 1. Will the City entertain allowing any other areas to Se included, such as: a. Oxford Road b. "7o. Bend" Development (Leaf/Bayside) 2. Will the City absorb any reserve charge. 3. Will the properties in the designated area be allowed to change the zoning once sewer is available in order to help them defray the cost. Also, would additional buildable lots created through a rezoning be required to pay a full unit charge. (It should be noted that this was originally zoned R-lC, 1 acre lot size prior to the 1975 rezoning.) {. What level of support (1) and waivers of assessment does the Council desire to be s+ - --'Dr to undertaking this project. ALTERNATIVES - 1. Establish a date. 2. Respond to the questions. 3. Table fur further diauussicn. 4. Take no action. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council table further scue5 ono the item until its September 25, 1989 meeting. PROPOSED MOTION - Mooed Ly , seconded by that the Council table further discussion e7-the item until its September. 25, 1989 meeting. Ayes _, Nay. _ cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building a Zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asat. Planning A Zoning Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director Glenn Cook, City Engineer 8289 1 -' INQUIRIES AND RESPONSES STOBBS BAY INFORMATIONAL MEETING JDLY 27, 1989 ORONO HIGH SCHOOL ADDITORIUM At the informational meeting that was he_d on July 27, 1989, approximately 35 property owners were present together with Co"ncilmember J. Diann Goetten and members from the staff L—luding Michael Gaffron, Glenn Cook, John Gerhardson, Jeanne Mabusth and Mark Bernhardson. Following ap introduction by the City Administrator, Michael Gaffron gave an overview of the Waste Management Study, outlining each of the a_terna&: ves %.d the merits -id pitfalls of each of those alternatives. -._s was followed by a presentation of the sewering opt in as far as layout and expense presented by Glenn Cook. _allowing this presentation general quest. ons were taken. Tha fallowing represents the significant questions that were raised and responses given to those. (As `hose are paraphrased they may encapsulate two or three questions that were asked together with their responses and are noc necessarily in the order in which the questions were asked.) 1. Is there not a law that r^quires that the pc,Jpert: •.caner be required to pay only the amount of ` —efic to the property? Minnesota special assessments are i<mited to to benefit .acrease brought e�.ogt by the imp:- -it' to that property. T��A City is cognisant of this la• structuring the . _, ,nt of actual special assessmen, equ '. .o or Less than the expected benefit tb the great rtnge .: :perties. The balance f the cost will be covered b_ —anection char%A. There is a possibility the connection a can be financed by the City offer the '-.: tcrm -- he .vsessment which is ezoected to be 15 or 2. What are the costs of the project and what are anticipated to be the financing options. The costs are detailed on the sheet that was handed out, split out betweet: about a 56,500 assessment charge and between $4,20C and $9,700 connect+on charge. It is anticipated that it would be a 15 to 20 year bond issue. If your total assessment plus conne.tion charge was $lo,0oo over 15 yaacs tf—tt would cost about $670 per year in interest toget`7-:r wi h an initial interest cost of about $500 which would be decrease over the 15 year period to a final year interest cost in the range of $60.00. Spread over _ years, the annual principal would go down but the amount of interest paid over that timeperiod would be increased. If your rate is $15,000 just multiply those numbers by 1.5 times the $10,000 number. 3. Are the larger lots subsidizing the smaller lots? To the extent that sewer is going to be installed u'jacent to a large lot, a lot with a large frontage actually ^osts mort to serve than a lot with a small frontage. To the extent that sewer is needed the greater number of smaller lots actually, defray the cost for the larger lots. (This is balanced out by splittt the areas betveen the larger and smaller lots ar' havin a lateral cost for the smaller lots, in this �in, as than for the larger lots.` 4. Aren't there ot'. .aces, such as Cygnet Place, that in the future will need ro have sewer? The City staff has looked at Cygnet Plac as far as -ewerinq and what impact that has on this project. It is anticipated that that area will be looked at over the next 5 or 10 ears. Whether the area needs sewer would be the subject of a Waste Management Study and will be dependent, r..t only, on lot s-ze but also topography, soil corditions, water table ate. ti.s `poked at it as to how a sewer pipe ' be run on an _::imate basis. j 6 VA Will there not be excess capacity in the line that someone ,- else could use? The minimum diameter line that car. be put in according to state requireiaents would be an 8 inch line? This obviously can serve more than the approximately 100 units in this area. Other areas could be hooked into this and utilize this capaci.y. Staff has discussed the possibility of having a portion of the cost of the excess capacity picked up by the City initially as a reserve charge, to eventually a funded by those who may use the pipe. To the extent that this is done, every $100,000 that the City would set aside as reserve charge would reduce the unit charge by approximately $1,000 per unit based on 100 units. It should be remembered however, that this area will be hooking into the line on Tonkawa Road (Co. Rd. 135) which has "ressrve capaCity" for this area and for future areas. (All the people along Tonkawa paid for their entire system and there is no anticipation that they would be rebated anything as a result of this improvement.) If you are on a large lot can you stay out of the sewer project? It has been the City's policy to include all properties which are abutting a line. This is done becau.;e you now have an option for sanitary disposal that you previously did not have even if you choose not to exercise it. City policy has been that all properties_ abutting a line hook up in the study area and that they must hook up within 16 months and pay for the improvement. Will zoning be changed to help us afford the improvement? In 1975 this area was zoned from the previous 1 acre to 2 acre zone because there was not sewer in the are,. This was Also done in other areas of the City that did not .,ave sewer, including the Crystal Say area. That sewer was installed in 1985 and there has been no request by the residents nor any + initiative by the City to rezone tLac area. (It should be I{ noted that even if rezoned to 1 acre standar',. the bulk of the lots in the Crystal Bay area would remai nbstandard.) Should a request for rezoning be considered, .ue City would have to amend its Comprehensive Plan. Also, to the extent k that individual properties were looking for additional hockups that would help decrease tht overall unit charge but that property would then have to pay for more units. S. Will a new subdivision, such as the one being proposed east of Leaf Street, be included in the project? It ha.,, not been the policy of the City to include any areas that do not absolutely need sewer. This area is developing to a 2 a:re standard and preliminary indications are that it will ha'✓ -a adequate ^onditions for do -site septic systems on each building site. Even if the City were to allow sewering of this area, the topography of the area would require significant design parameters that would not result in a substantial reduction in unit lateral cost for the Stubbs Hay project. Inclusion of all those units in the project may reduce the trunk cost by about 13%. (100 units in Stubbs Hay 22, anits in "Sussex") 9. Why is the property on Oxford Road being left out? Again, this area was develored to the 2 acre standard and although it is lakeshore property which differentiates it from the property east of Leaf, it is not contemplated to be included as there should be adequate septic systems for this area. Ba=ed on general City policy we have cot addressed this question to the Council but we will address both this and the question regarding the subdivision. The inclusion of the Oxford property wodld probably reduce the trunk cost by about 10i. (10 properties) 10. now soon could a project be undertaken? The project progress is dependenc on the level of interest of the neighborhood. If substantial interest is generated this fall and hearings could be held this winter, plans could be drawn this winter and construction begun in the spring. It is inportant to realize that the Council will probably not undertake this project unless a substantial majority of the property owners are interested in undertaking this project to the point of agreeing to sign a waiver of tppea on this project. This is a neighborhood problem, and the neighborhood should get together to decide how t'.ey want to solve it. (It was mentioned that the current p.ices are as 4 much as 20% below the normal because of the low lake level, which influences the water table, this however could change within a year to two.) 11. When is the next meeting? It is anticipated that the next meeting will be within the next 2 to 3 months. In the meantime we suggest to you, if you have questions about your particular lot that you speak to Michael Ga Efron as he has diagrammed each of the lots, and discuss not only set backs as diagrammed but also comments such as soil conditions and slopes. (Some owners indicated that they would like the meeting as soon a possible in order to get this underway.) 12. What Federal or State monies are available for this project? There used to be monies available in the '60's rnd '70's but with the change in the Federal program these monies are no longer available from the Federal level. The City looked at this for the Crystal Bay project and were not able to get any across-the-board grants. (We forgot to mention that the City was able to get funds individually for people through the C.D.B.G. program, but those are no longer available either.) Today we are not aware of P.C.A. or Lake Minnetonka Conservation District mandating hookups in order to preserve the lake. To the extent that other people around the lake have paid for the cost of hooking up their own sewer it is prubably not expected that the L.M.C.D, would do a general assessment to help pay for the small area that is left. (Subsequent to the meeting Michael Gaffron has been in contact with P.C.A. to determine what, if ar,y, grants might be available to help fund this project. P.C.A. has funds available for septic system rehabilitation grants, but only for cities whose overall Citywide average income is below the state median. State median is $17,161. Orono's average income is $30,136. (all 1980 data), hence PCA has indicated Orono would nct qualify.) �f TO: Mayor Grabek Orono City Councilmembers PROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administratd DATE: September 14, 1989 SUBJ: Stubbs Bay Sewer Attachment: Stubbs Bay Sewer Memo-8/17/89 ISSUE - 1. Presentation of information to Council related to primary issues raised at the Stubbs Ray Meeting held July 27, 1989. 2. Establish a date for the next Stubbs Bays meeting which would be with interested residents of the area and the Council. INTRODUCTION - At thi-Council's August 28, 1989 Council Meeting, Attachment A was presented outlining significant issues related to the Stubbs Bay sewer that had been raised at the July Meeting. DISCUSSION - Issue-= Outline of Major Issues A. Inclusion of other areas - 1. Oxford Road - This area was developed at the 2-acre lakeshn_e stanTa-rTin i978. While screr could be extended to this area an estimate for this extension has not been made. There are 11 properties in this subdivision and presently there is only one septic system that has had intermittent problems. The Oxford Road area is in part lakeshore property and this may have special consideration as to whether or not it is included in the sewer project. 2. Sussex De�v e�l o�p�me�nt - This is presently being proposed for edpmentIt 3s at a 2-acre density for a total of 17 residential lots. The topography of thi: area may make it expensive to c•,er this ar as as it would need either a deep gravity line or a lift station line into the Stubbs Bay sewer to feed into the proposed Stubbs Bay system. 3. Cyqnet Place - This area contains 19 developed lots which are pre om natel-y-F/3 - 1 acre. It is an area the City may look at for an alternative waste management study in the next 5 years. Topography may make sewering this area expensive. Also there are another 6 lots in between the Stubbs Bay area and Cygnet that coul,' also be looked at. In ordor to include any of these in the development, the City would need to make a request for MUSA line extension. (Although the Stubbs Bay area is currently not within the MUSA 1 line, it was identified as an area that could be expanded in the City's Comprehensive Management Plan.) The impact of adding these units would be an effort to reduce the cost to the existing 82 residential developed lots and the approximate 10 additional potentially buildable vacant lots. The inclusion of Sussex would reduce the cost approximately 15% of the trunk costs or about 7-10% of the overall. oxford would reduce the per unit trunk cost about 12% and about 6-86 of the total per unit cost. Cygnet Place would reduce the per unit trunk cost by 211 and the total by 10-12%. If these were not included at this time, there is enough capacity in the line to allow for their connection in the future. This would probably be done as a combination of an assessment together with a connection charge into the main. B. City Funding of A�nX Reserve Charge - As noted in the first item, there will be additional capacity of approximately 250+ units in this line which will be ^onstructed at the minimum size. These together could reduce the total cost by about 25%. As an alternative for each $100,000 00 in reserve capacity the City would take would result in about $1,000.00 per ptoperty reduction of those currently in the Stubbs Bay area. (About an 88 reduction in the total cost which ranges from $11,-16,000). `) If the City chooses not to fund any portion of the sewer the City may face a forced reduction of special assessments resulting from the appeals process. Obviously this could be limited by requiring a certain percentage of appeal waivers to be signed prior to the project being undertaken. Potential Rezoning - This area was originally zoned 1 acre and prior to 1975 and when the new standards came in was placed at a 2-,acre zoning. The issue is whether the City would consider rezoning the properties in the area to 1 acre (or less) if sewer did come in. The advantage to the property owner is in part to reduce the number of variances that they would need to obtain permits to improve their property, together with allowing some property owners tb,; ability to subdivide their property and to help finance the sewer project. It should be remembered, however, that additional units would have to pay an amount substantially similar in the currently projected figures so there may not be that much gained in subdivision. The related issue is the fact that the City has not done any rezoning in the Crystal Bay area or any other 2 acre zone areas severed since the 1975 rezoning. In the Crystal Bay area those served by sewers would remain substandard lots even under the 1-acre zoning and therefore there would be few if any lots that would be able to be subdivided. In the Stubbs Bay area there are approximately 9 2-plus acre properties that could subdivide into an additional 9 lots. This ... 2 _ ... .._ would reduce the overall cost by 10%. D. Level of Support - The ass.zmption on the Stubbs Bay project has been that the Council would require a certain level of suppor-" as expressed in waiver of assessment prior to undertaking the project. These waivers of assessment initially would express the "top end" over which any amount over that (apart from capitalized interest) would require that new waivers be signed. Due to the nature of the area, it is racommended that a certain percentage of the property owners in the current area sign waivers prior to taking further steps in the process. Not having a certain level of assessment waiver, prior to the date that the pr-ject is ordered, would place the City at risk for the special assessment portion being appealed. (The staff is recommending a special assessment level that would not be that much greater than t;ie Crvstal Bay area finally was assessed), but this does not insure that this would not be appealed or reduced.) Issue 2 - Next Stubbs Bay Meeting It woul- be appropriate that the meeting be held in November/December in order for construction to be done next year. In advance of that however, the City could communicate to the residents that they would have to circulate among themselves a petition and get a minimum percentage of persons interested in undertaking the project. The City could request that the assessment waivers be signed prior to the ur.lering of the project. Once the petition is submitted, the CJnncil coul,1 have a special meeting to address the questions raised and take any additional qo�tions from the neighbors. ALTERNATIVES - Issue 1 - 1. Take a position of the Council on each of the items. 2. Table for further discussion. 3. Take no acl.ion at this time. Issue 2 - 1- Establish a meeting date. 2. Await Establishing a date until after a petition if received. 3. Direct staff to send a letter regarding the level of support needed. 1 RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that stiff send a letter to the affected property owners indicating the tentative meeting date in December, but that a petition signing an assessment waiver at the 60% level of ,roperty owners interested in the project must be received prior to a meeting being held. PROPOSED MOTION Move , seconded by that Council direct staff to send a letter to the abutting property owners outlining the level of support needed in order for the Council and City to further consider this as a project. Ayes , Nays cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building S Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, Planning s Zonining Administrator John R. 7erhardson, Public Works Director Glenn Cook, City Engineer 81789.11 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato DATE: August 17, 1989 SUBJECT: Stubb's Bay Sewer Meeting Attachment: A. Stubb's Bay Sewer Meeting Questions and Answers ISSUE - 1. Presentation o! information regarding the Stubb's Bay meeting held July 27, 1959. 2. Establishment of a date for the next Stubb's Bay meeting. INTRODUCTION - At the informational. meeting held July 27, 1989, a n um6er orquestions were raised. At_nchment A was ?repared to summarize the questions and answers given at that meeting. In addition, a number of residents cf the area who were interested in furthering the developme..i of a sewer desire to have a meeting as soon a possible. DISCUSSION - It is hoped that a meeting regarding Stubb's Bay would again be held in. November and at that time the City would be able to respond to questions that were not able to be addressed at the July 27th meeting. Significant questions to be responded to are: 1. Will the City entertain allowing any other areas to be included, such as: a. Oxford Road b. "Fox Bend" Developn.ent (Leaf/Baysidei 2. Will the City absorb any reserve charge. 3. Will the properties in the designated arts be allowed to change the zoning once sewer is available in order to help then defray the cost. Also, would additional buildable lots created through a rezoning be required to pay a full unit charge. (It should be noted that this was originally zoned R-IC, 1 acre Lot size prior to the. 1.975 rezoning.) 4. What level of support (1) and waivers of assessment does the Council desire to be signed Frior to undertaking this project. ALTERNATIVES - 1. Establish a date. 2. Respond to the questions. 1. Table for further discussion. 4. Take no action. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council table further discussion the item until its September 25, 1989 meeting. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by , that the Council table further discussion of the item until its September 25, 1989 meeting. Ayes _, Nays _. cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Puilding 6 zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning 6 Zoning Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director Glenn Cook, City Engineer 821 .1 INQUIRIES AND RESPONSES STUBBS BAY INFORMATIONAL MEETING JULY 27, 1989 nRONO HIGH SCHOOL AUDITOPIUM At the informational meeting that was held on Jul, 27, 1989, approximately 35 property owners were present together with Counc-Imember J. Diann Goetten and members from the staff including Michael Gaffron, Glenn Cook, John Gerhardson, Jeanne Mabusth and Mark Bernhardson. Following an introduction by the City Administrator, Michael Gaffron gave an overview of the Waste Management Study, outlining .rich of the alternatives and the merits and pitfalls of each of these alternatives. This was followed by a presentation of the sewering option as far as layout and expense presented by Glenn Cook. Following this presentation general question. were taken. The following represents the significa.:t questions that were raised and responses given to those. (As these are paraphrased they may encapsulate two or three questions that were asked together with their responses and are not necessarily in the order in which the questions were asked.) 1. Is there not a law that requires that the property owner be required to pay only the amount of benefit to the property? Minnesota special assessments are limited to the benefit (increase brought about by the improvement) to that property. The City is cognizant of this law and is structuring the amount of actual special assessment to be equal to or less than the expected benefit to the great range of prod "ties. The balance of the cost will be covered by a cc ction charge. There is a possibility the connection chary: can be financed by the City over the sama term as the assessment which is expected to be 15 or 20 ye--�. 2. What are the costs of the projerl. and what are anticipateu to be the financing options. The costs are detailed on the sheet that was handed out, spl' : out between about a $6,500 assessment charge and between $4,200 and S9,700 connection charge. It is anticipated that it would be a 15 to 20 year bond issue. If your total assessment plus connection charge was $10,000 over 15 years that would cost about $670 per year in interest together with an initial interest cost of about $800 which would be decease over the 15 year period to a final year interest cost in the range of $60.00. Scread over years, the annual principal would go down but the amount of interest paij over that timeperiod would be inc.eased. If you. rate is $15,000 just multiply those numbers by 1.5 times the $10,000 number. 3. Are the larger lots subsidizing the smaller lots? To the extent that sewer is ;jing to be installed ad_acent t, a large lot, a lot with a large frontage actually costs more to serve than a lot with a small frontage. To the extant that sewer is needed the greater number of smaller lots actual.y, defray the cost for the large. lots. (This is balanced out by splitting the areas between the larger and smaller lots and having the lateral cost for the smaller Iota, in this case, being less titan for the larger lots.) 4. - ro't there other places, such as Cygnet Pla-:. that in the - will need to have sewer? The City staff has locked at rvgnet Place os far as sewerina and what impart that has on this project. It is anticipated that that a: . -ea vi11 be loote,. at. over t... text 5 or 10 -^ars. Whether the a:ea needs -ewer would be the subject of a Waste Management Study and will b: endent, not onl;•, on lot size but also topography, soil conditiins, water tac '.e etc. We looked at it as to hoi a sewer pipe will ,e run on an app[cximate basis. 5. Will there not be excess capac/ty In the line that someone else could use? The minimum diameter line that can be put in according to state requirements would be an 8 inch line? This obvi_7us3y can serve more than the approximately 100 units in this area. Other areas could be hooked into this and utilize t-Ie capacity. Staff has discussed the possibility of having a portion of the cost of the excess capacity picked up by the City initially as a reserve charg3, to eventually be funded ,y Lhose who may nse the pipe. To the exte-' '.hat this is done, every $100,000 that the City would set a .e ae reserve charge would reduce the unit charge by approximately $1,000 per unit based on 100 units. It. should be remembered however, that this area will be hooking into the line on Tonkawa Road (Co. Rd. 135) hich ❑se "reserve capacity" for this area and for future areas. (Ail the people along Tonkawa paid for their entire systim and there It ".o anticipation that they would be rebated anything as a result of this improveme„t.) 6. If you are on a large 19t can you stay c �f the sewer project? It has been the City's policy to include all properties which a. abut .ng a line. This is done because you now have an opt.en for sanite..,v d+.sposal that you previously did not have ev„n if you choose not to exercise it. City policy '.a^ bees, t'iat all properties abutting a line hook up in the study ara� id that they must hook up within 16 months and pay for the Improvement. 7. Will .ing he changed to help us afford the improver"t? In 1.9',5 this area was zo%ed from the previour 1 3cre to 2 fare zone because there was not sewer in the area. This was also done in other areas of the City that did not have sewer, the Crystal Bay area. V, + aewer was installed .., 1985 on,' there has been no request ` .he residents nor any Initiative by the City to rezone that Brea. (It should be noted that even if rezoned to 1 acre 3ta„dards, the bulk of the lots in the Crvstal Bay area would remain substandard.) Should a request fc rezoning be cr - ered, the ♦ ry would have to amend its Comprehensive P/a,� 180, to the 9 that individual properties were looking for additional hookups that would help decrease the overall unit charge but that property would then have to pay for more units. 8. Will a new subdivision, such as the one being proposed east of Leaf Street, be included in the project? It has not been the policy of the City to include any areas that do not absolutely need sewer. This area is developing to a 2 acre standard and preliminary indications are that it will have adequate conditions for on -site septic systems on each building site. Even if the City were to allow sewering of this area, the topography of the area would require significant design parameters that would not result in a substantial recuction in unit lateral cost for the Stubbs Bay project. Inclusion of all those units in the project may reduce the trunk cost by about 20%. (100 units in Stubbs Bay 22, unl'_— , in "Sussex") 9. Why is the property on Oxford Road being left out? Again, this area vas developed to the 2 acre standard and although it is lakeshore property which differentiates it from the property east of Leaf, it is not contemplated to be included as there should be adequate septic systems for this area. Based on general City policy we have not addressed this question to the Council but we will address both this and the question regarding the subdivision. The inclusion of the Oxford property would probably reduce the trunk cost by about 104. (10 properties) 10. How soon could a project be undertaken? The project progress is dependent on the level of interest of the neighborhood. If substantial interes'_ is generated this fall and hearings could be held this winter, plans could be drawn this winter and construction begun in the spring. It is important to realize that the Council will probably not undertake this project unless a substantial majority of the property owners are interested in undertaking this project to the point of agreeing to s'_gn a waiver of appeal on this project. This is a neighborhood problem, and the neighborhood should get together to decide how they want to solve it. (It was mentioned that the current prices are as 4 much as 20% below the normal be -„a5.. of the low lake level, which influences the water table, this however could change within a year to two.) 11. When is the next meeting? It is anticipated that the next meeting will be within the next 2 to 3 months. In the meantime we suggest to you, if you have questions about your particular lot that you speak to Michael Gaffron as he has diagrammed each of the lots, and discuss net only set backs as diagrammed but also comments such as soil conditions and slopes. (Some owners indicated that they would like the meeting as soon a possible in order to get this underway.) 12. What Federal or State monies are available for this project? There used to be monies available in the '60's and 170's but with the change in the Federal program these monies are no longer available from the Federal level. The City looked at this for the Crystal Bay project and were not able to get any across-the-board grants. (We forgot to mention that the City was able to get funds individually for people through the C.D.B.G. program, but those are no longer available either.) Today we are not aware of P.C.A. or Lake Minnetonka Conservation District mandating hookups in order to preserve the lake. To the extent that other people around the lake have paid for the cost of hooking up their own sewer it is probably not expected that the L.M.C.D. would do a general assessment to help pay for the small area that is left. (Subsequent to the meeting Michael Gaffron has been in contact with P.C.A. to determine what, if any, grants might be available to help fund this project. P.C.A. has funds available for septic system rehabilitation grants, but only for cities whose overall Citywide average income is below the state median. State median is $17,161. Orono's average income is $30,736. (all 1980 data), hence PCA has indicated Orono would not qualify.) i 11689.7 COUNCIL MEETING NOV 13 1989 TO: Mayor and City Council t CITY OF ORONO FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: November 6, 1989 SUBJECT: West Hennepin Human Services - Request for Support Attachment: A.West Hennepin Human Services Letter Dated 10/23/89 B. West Hennepin Hu,.,- , Services Letter Revised tl/6/89 C. Proposed Resolution ISSUE - Presentation of West Hennepin Human Services letter to determine what type of support, if any, the Council desires in response to their request. INTRODUCTION - Hennepin County has found a need in its budgeting for 1990 to look to cut its expenditures in several areas from the original proposed increases. In its effort to do these cuts it has looked to not only cut back on increases but in selected areas eliminate programs that they currently fund. DISCUSSION - A number of years ago in order to decentralize services from its downtown/central cities areas Hennepin County established three suburban human services boards to assist in providing the services to suburban residents who had previously had to venture downtown to obtain them. Starting in about 1985 the City of Orono had received requests to support these and does provide appointees to serve on these Boards. Currently the City is supporting this at about .200 per capita for a total of $1,440 per year. The County currently is looking to entirely eliminate their support of these human services boards. If these boards were to have to cease to exist because of a funding removal suburban users of these services would need to use the central city locations. At issue for West Hennepin Human Services is approximately $70,000. Generally these human services operate more efficiently than the central city operation as it is done by contracting with non-profit agencies, part-time employees and volunteers whereas the cental city operations are more dependent on full time staff. If the County funding were eliminated the human services would approach the Cities for an approximately .800 contribution which would make up the $70,000 lost from the County. As noted in Attachment B the alternative presented by the County Administrator was that they could be funded by the cities. This would mean that approximately $4,320 increase over the current budget estimate the City has placed for this line item for a total of $ 5, 760. ALTERNATIVES - 1. Table for further discussion. 2. Adopt the resolution. 3. Amend and adopt. 4. Take no action. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that at this time the City adopt a reso ution of support of West Hennepin Human Services and ongoing County funding of an essentially County responsibility and that if cuts have to be made that they be made in other areas of look to economize on their human services provision through reducing use of full time staff. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that Council adopt resolution # expressing Council's interest in continued County funding for West Hennepin Human Services. Ayes !, Nays _ cc: Marcy Schapiro, Executive Director West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board 4100 Vernon Avenue South St. Louis Park, MN 55416 2 west hennepin human services planning b T1W# 6VT 4100 vernon avenue south, st. louts pO, wait 920.5533 human In �u [tfY�c!/ October-23, 1989 Dear West Hennepin Member Municipality; The Human Services Councils, including West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board, have been recommended by the County Administrator to have their Hennepin County funding ended on January 1, 1990. This would be a devastating blow to West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board. From our very begintuing, West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board has been a partnership between arei tunicipalities and Hennepin County to assure that there are adequate services that are accessible to residents of the West Hennepin communities. A key element has been both the municipal and county funding. Now Hennepin County is proposing to withdraw their half of the partnership. West Hennepin Human Services Plarudng Board has been a cost effective way for West Hennepin municipalities to join together to make sure there is planning for human services. We have worked to make sure that human service tax dollars are brought back in the form of services that meet the real needs of area residents. Before West Hennepin Human Services began, Hennepin County provided very few services in the West Hennepin area. In the 16 years of our existence, we have successfully worked to build a coordinated, cost-effective system. We are asking our member municipalities to pass the enclosed resolution and send it to all of the Hennepin County Commissioners on our behalf. Enclosed is a fact sheet outlining the effect of the proposes: cut. It is unfortunate that we have been put in the pc�ition to put so inuch energy into lobbying Hennepin County for our own funding. We would prefer to be able 'co spend all of our time and energy advocating for a service system to benefit the citizens of the West Hennepin area. We hope that you will support our efforts to retain our Hennepin County funding. If you would like further information, please contact Marcy Shapiro or Bruce Larson of our staff at 920-5533, or your municipality's representatives on our Board of Directors. Sincerely, Dale Woodbeck, Chair Board of Directors encl west hsnnspin human services planning board 4100 vwwn avenue south, st. louts parts, minnssota 55416 Weihen � AtpiA 95533 tA human 1sfvi«! WEST HE24KEPIN HUMAN SERVICES PLANNING BOARD INTRODUCTION West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board (WENS) acts mainly as a planning and coordinating agency through which citizens are a part of the decisionmaking process in delivering needed health and social services for the 160 square mile West Hennepin area. It provides education, consultation and technical assistance on issues pertaining to human service delivery systems. It provides linkages between governmental units, consumers and service providers; increases awareness of available human service resources; identifies and advocates for needed services and improvements of the existing services system; and assists others in the development of human services programs. WHHS also coordinates the delivery of services when there is no other age :y to do it. Our work in the Emergency Services Program, the House Doctor Program, and the Energy Assistance Program are examples of this. We are working to promote programs such as the House Doctor that tie the needs of municipal efforts with those of human services. WHHS is the only agency providing these planning and coordinating services to the West Hennepin area. We rely heavily on the involvement of volunteers to maximize cost effectiveness and increase citizen involvement. We view ourselves as an advocate for the residents of our meniter cities. We work to make services more accessible on a decentralized basis and get a fair share of human tax service dollars back into our communities. This effort is critical for suburban residents to have equal opportunity and access to services as do their urban counterparts. We al:;o work for the establishment of new or expanded services when a need is documented through our research and needs assessment process. PROGRAMS AND SERVICES Energy Assi-tance Program There are twenty-two decentralized intake sites operated by WHHS which area residents can apply for the Energy Assistance Program. During the 1`88-1989 Energy Assistance Program, the following assistance was rP:eived by residents of Suburban Hennepin County through WHHS. * 3,886 Suburban Hennepin households (this is 10,403 individuals) applied for heatirg assistance from our program. * $1,104,8A of heating grants was distributed �o Suburban Hennepin residents. * In addition 124 households participated in Partners, a comprehensive, coordinated energy crisis program Emergency Services WHHS received Hennepin County funds for emergency food, shelter, clothing and transportation services. The program is delivered in cooperation with Interchurch Community Association, Interfaith Outreach, St. Louis Park Emergency Program and Westonka Christian Services as well as Home Free Shelter, Sojourner Shelter and 12 area police departments. In 1988, a total of $90,912 served 4,058 West Hennepin residents with food, 256 with shelter and 1,265 with clothing. Energy Conservation Program We provide the Project AIF./House Doctor (weatherization and audit program) and Home Energy Check-up Programs in 11 suburban cities. As part of these, we also have four Community Energy Councils to provide input. This is funded by Utilities and the State of Minnesota. We are in the process of adding five cities. Directory of Services We published our mini -directory of human services. 40,000 copies were printed through a donation from Twin West Chamber of Commerce Foundation. We publish two combination directories and how to guides: "Basic Tools: A Survival Skills Guide for the Unemployed and Underemployed" and "home Sweet Home: A Guide to Help Find Affordable Housing." We also publish a directory for clients of our Energy Assistance Program and one for our Emergency Services Program. Information and Referral we do an average of about 100 information and referral calls per month. Community H ae lth Annually we prepare a report on community health needs and provide advice to the Hennepin County Community Health AdvisoC'^�^�^��*�� ry Service Coordination We provide assistance to a number of service coordination groups including: Providers West, Emergency Service Providers, Mental Health Aftercare Providers, Westonka Coordination Group, West Hennepin :-3uth Service Providers. Housing Advocacy Project We are in the planning stages of this project which aims to make affordable housing a "front burner" issue in the suburbs. We are providing staff leadership to this joint project of the human service councils. It is funded by the Minneapolis Foundation. Legislative Agenda We have a legislative agenda of nine categories and provi.• -tensive staff time to working on these issues. We work with and pr 'e leadership to a number of coalitions on these issues. We pi is'Ie staff assistance to a joint lobby task force of the three human service councils and CASH. Community Education Services WHHS conducts a variety of activities to inform the community of area human service needs, issues and availability. Specific activities include information and referral calls, letters of support (after careful evaluation), technical assistance to area agencies and presentations to area community groups on issues such as human service resources, legislation, emergency needs and our service priority reports. Accessibility of Services WHHS advocates • th decision makers such as Hennepin County and the State of Minnesota to provide service in a decentralized format to the residents if the West Hennepin County. This effort is critical for suburban residents to have equal opportunity and access to services as do their urban counterparts. We also work for the establishment of new or expanded services when a need is documented through our research and needs assessment process. Examples of specific program development resulting from the efforts of WHHS include: Community Action for Suburban Hennepin (CASH) which has brought in $250,000 of federal and state anti -poverty funds; Bridge West which provides crisis housing for youth; West Hennepin Community center for Mentally Handicapped Citizens; Domestic Abuse Intervention projects in several West Hennepin Cities: the MEED State Johs Program; the Suburban House Doctor Program; four suburban residential treatment programs for chronically mentally ill people; a food co-op in St. Louis Park; County and Federal funding for Emergency Service Program; the suburban federally funded Energy Assistance Program; Senior Health screening programs; Metro West Coordinated Transportation Project; parenting education programs in a number of school districts; Parents Anonymous group; suburban detox programs; and decentralized county programs such as the Ridgedale Community Center. In addition, we have effectively advocated with Hennepin County for continued funding of programs such as Pyramid Mental Health Center. Community Social, Services Act Process The Ccmmunity Social Services Act Process varies from year-to-year depending upon the opportunities available for the gathering and analysis of data. The process by which the 1989 service priorities were formulated included the participation of 492 persons. Specific activities included: * A review of local research * A survey of Energy Assistance Program participants * Release of report "Economic 8 Social Trends in Hennepin County * Analysis of social service use trend data in West Hennepin * Presentation of findings, priorities and issues to the Hennepin County COmmunity Services management team and United Way planning department * Focus group interviews on: emergency service needs; child and family issues; jobs, income and self-sufficiency; and access to services; developmental disabilities, child care, physical disabilities, chemical health and senior services * Monitoring the Hennepin County budget * release of two reports Technical Assistance We provide technical assistance to an average of 10-15 agencies and organizations per month. Mental Health We have organized a Mental Health Advisory Committee which includes consumers, family members and providers. The group is focusing on bringing mental health services to the area to meet the needs of area residents. Advisory Committee We serve on a number of advisory committees to provide a link to area services. Hennepin County Task Force on Youth ar.d Drugs This task force was created at the Commissioner Sivanich to start the active role in its implementation. volunteer Hours impetus of WHHS. We advocated with task force and have maintained an During 1988, 8,000 volunteer hours were donated to WHHS Area Energy Assistance, the Board of Directors and Citizen Participation Process. 4 HELP US NOW... SO WE CAN CONTINUE TO HELP YOU The Hennepin Go.,jnty funding for West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board will be totally cut in l aX), unless supporters from our t;ommunities can convince the County Commissioners otherwise. This means that West Hennepin Human Services will no longer be able to: * be an advocate for West Hennepin area residents * lobby for initiatives at the state and federal level and provide support to state legislative advocacy coalitions * develop needed services ir our communities * educate the community about available human services c, -' human service issues * plan for meeting the real needs of OL" friends and neighbc, * coordinate for an effective and cooperative human services * assure that consumers and other area resident,, have a voice pion making through a citizen participation process and we will no longer be able to leverage funds for the: ' Suburban Hennepin Energy Assistance Program ' Suburban Hennepin Corsei ation Improvement Program (Home Energy Check-up and Project AIR) * West Hennepin Emergency Services Program ' Suburban Hennepin Affordable Hous6g Collaborative ' West Hennepin Food Stamp Outreach Program • MAZEBUSTERS Program (a program to help people on welfare move toward self sufficiency) if you feel that... >a the Planning Board assists the communities to better meet the human service needs of the people who live here the Planning Eoard assists residents and consumers to play an essential and important role in defining ti,eir own problems and recommerKling their own solutions the suburban municipalities should have an organizational link with Hennepin County for planning and developing human services Hennepin County should continue Its support for the Human Services Councils (All of the Suburtgn and SKY of Min _U dimes Human service Coun icil Pl�nnin Coordination ark Citizen Participation gQtivOies haves n recommended to be totally cut by the H@nnepin County Administrator r IF YOU DO :° . YOU CAN HELP BY =+ WRMNG CALLING OR VISITING COUNTY COMMISSIONERS i O EXPRESS YOUR SUPPORT Wei �YAIOA Over for County Commissioners addresses and phone Itrvl'Ct/ i� l numbers. f . r For more information, contact West Hennepin Human -� Services, 4100 Vernon Avenue South, St Louis Park, MN 55416 or call 920-5533 date: November 3, 1989 for immadiato rolewe Contact: Marcy Shapiro 920- 5533 COUNTY CUTS TO HAVE STRONG IMPACT ON SUBURBS Suburban Hennepin County has been targeted for severe budget cuts by the Hennepin County Administrator in his plan for the 1990 Hennepin County bud _-c. Hennepin County must eliminate over $8 million from its Community Services Department budget in order to meet levy limitations recently imposed by the State Legia].:-iture. As the myth continues that there are no social problems and that there is no poverty in sub•.irban areas, west Hennepin County is at risk of slipping further behind in the human services delivery to its residents. Currently suburban areas represent 60% oe the population of Hennepin County but receive a much smaller proportion of human services programs. The first ring western suburbs are beginning to echo the demographic trends and human services rseds seen in the inner city of Minneapolis a decade ago. T.e second and third ring more rural communities also havt- needs for services, which include easier access to services and programs. In the proposed ,iennepin County budget, six es:. .ial programs that provide direct services and are located in the west Hennepin area have been proposed to be eliminated. They are: Hennepin County Outreach and Referral, Relate Counseling Center, the Walk-in enter at Perspectives, Vinland National Center, Senior Community Services, and West Hennepin Community Center. Advocates say that these cuts will lea-e our residents with severely limited acce5s to services. This will lead to unmet needs; to a more overworked county staff; and ultimately to to more expensive services and more institutional care. Another targeted cut .-'z'ch directly impacts on the west suburban a.-�a is the W,.-_ Hennepin Human Services Planning Board. This agency was formed by west suburban cities and Hennepin County through a joint powers agreement in 1973. The agency serres wait hennepin human itrvicei planning booed 4100 vernon avenue youth. it. lovit pack. minntiota 55410 West hei-.nepin human services F ping bo 4 f /J 4100 vemon avenue south, st. Iouiz We he nnepin 920-5533 human lerviee� EST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES PLANNING BOARD 1990 Hennepin Ccunty Proposed Budget Cuts PLANNING AND COORDINATION: West Hennepin Human Services - $57,594 All three suburban Human Services Councils - $172,782 Justification by County Administrator for his Recommendation: "HSC - Planning The funds, which are provided to the three suburban Human Services k,oun, ils for the purpose of providing community planning on a more extensive basis than is the case for the five city Human Services Councils (which receive money only for citizen participation efforts), would be eliminated. Additional fundina for the suburban Councils' operations could be sought from the cities which established the Councils via joint powers agreements or trom the suburban Community Action Agency (CASH)." CITIZEN PARTICIPATION West Hennepin Human Services - $12,769 All eight Human Services Councils - $102,1 `;2 Justification by County Adr, rator for nis Recommendation: "Human Services Councils - Citizen P rtiQlojiQn The current mechanism (i.e., eight Human Services Councils) for soliciting recommendations relative to service needs and priorities, as required by CSSA and Adult Mental Health Act,/Children's Mental Health Act, would be eliminate:'. To be in compliance with statutory requirements, other mechanisms would need to be created to provide this input. Department vis,bility, communication, "badges," etc., to various community groups, organizations, etc., as facslitated through the Human Services Councils, would be reduced." as the human service planning and coordinating body for the area and receives funding f-:om Hennepin County for planning, coordination, and citizen particpat-on activities. This joining together of local cities and the County through West Hennepin Human Services Planning 3oard has lent strength to the recognition and de-clopment of needed services and programs and has created an accessible service system for ci+izens of the west Hennepin area. The County has indicated that imposed levy limitations and increased services mandated b, the State have led to these cuts. Another primary reason for the crunch is the overspending by $5 million for costly out -of -home p]acements for children (rather than the utilization of less costly alternatives 99ch as the Bridge West Program). West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board has recently r leased an alternative budget. The Planning Board believes iat a number of optiL,.is must be examined in order to come up with a well thought out budget plan that leaves a viable human services system operating for suburban residents. The sever, Hennepin County Commissioners are now re-iieving the budget and the proposed cuts and are formulating alternative budget ideas. Commissioners expect tc. adopt the 1990 County budget by November 17. 11789.4 4 , * 7.4eV7- 71 A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF WEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES PLANNING BOARD WHEREAS, the Human Services Counr; i s have bt-en funded jointly ,y member municipalities and Hennepin Count, 5:.n.cc 1973 to meet human services -l.anning reeds; and WHEREAS, the nerd for planning and coordinating ser ✓ices in suburban ir;�l rural Hennepin County continues to be very important in assuring that the human servi,.e needs of growing suburban populations are met: and to impro-ing the quality of life in our communities; and WHFRP.AS, these planning and coordination activities help prevent fragmentation in the service delivery system, creaz:,, cost -Affective services, and avoid duplication; WHEREAS, contracted programs are the backbone of the human services system for suburban residents; WHEREAS, the Human Service Councils have been instrumental in building an accessible r. rman services system in he suburbs and in bringing our fair share of tax dollars back -to our communities in the form of services in proportion to the need for those services; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Orono strongly supports the full funding in 1990 of planning and coordination and citizen rarticipation programs for west Hennepin Human Services Planning Board; T;jERBFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLJED, that Hennepin County focus its bL,dget reduction efforts broadly rather than on human services contracted programs. Adopted by the City Council of the Cite of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held November 13, 1989. James R. Crabek, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Cler 11689.1 COUNCIL MEETING TO: Mayor and City Council NOV 131989 FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat-\ DATE: November 6, 1989 CITY OF ORONO SUBJECT. Highway 12 Water System Development Attachment: A. Water/Sewer Bid Tabulation Dated 6/30/89 ISSUE - 1. Status of current water construction projects on Highway 12. 2. Presentation of information regarding possible directions on additional system elements. INTRODUCTION - Currently the sewer an(' water t-unk lines are being constructed for the area between Willow an3 North Brown Road on the north side of highway 12 together wits a test ,.jell being dug on the north side to determine a location for the eventual municipal well. DISCUSSION - Issue #1 - Status of Highway 12 Construction Projects - A. Trunk Lines - The sewer and water trunk line construction is awaitirq rec ipt of bond documents after the necessary amendments were made to the contract. It is estimated that the construction will take Approximately 6-8 weeks with final restoration in spring or early summer 1990. If these are not received by Monday staff will probably present the necessary resolutions to change contractors. — - second lowest bidder was about $1,700 higher on a $200,000 pr(jest.) B. Well - The initial drilling was completed on Monday, November T, T-P9 for the first hole. The result of this drilling was a sufficient supply so that no further test drillings were needed to be done. Construction of the interim production well to supply the line has been commenced. Issue #2 _ Future Directions on Water Systems Development A. Water Extension to Medina - Discussions have commenced with staff of Medina regarding t- e possibility of an extension. The proposal has also been discussed at the Council level and it appe:,rs that there is interest in the idea. The City of Medina wil' be hopefully discussing the matter with the affected residents in January 1990. Longterm benefits would include; tower pressure support for the Medina system, available water service for those en Willow not abu_ting Highway 12 and the ability to spread the system wide costs, such as the tower, and ongoing operations over the revenue of a greater number of users. 1 Issues to be discussed include: a.) Construction cost sharing b.) Method of financing c.) Operational agreements 1. "Pre" tower 2. "Post" tower B. Water Tower Construction - As mentioned before from initiation of the bids and specs through construction of a water tower and putting it in service may take from 9 to 12 months. The development between Willow and North Brown Road does not require a tower, however for the development between Willow and Old Crystal Bay together with providing water service to existinI customers in Orono who do have water, would require its construction. As you may reca'' the property owners between Willow and Old Crystal Bay have . 3icated their ob; :tion to such an assessment. These property owners could either be assessed or have a connection charge or a combination of both. It is suggested that a minor amendment be made to the Highway 12 zoning requirements that sufficient water capacity be provided to them prior to any rezoning. (This is presently a requi-ement for sewer but not for water). (Owners of the property between Willow and Old Crystal Bay Road on the north side of Highway 12 have received exploratory inquiries regarding possible sale of their property. Staff will monitor these developments as they may develop.) ALTERNATIVES - 1. Accept the information. 2. Make any comments or ask questions regarding the information. 3. Table for further discussion. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that after any questions or comments are made that the information be accepted as presented for discussion in the future with directing staff to work with Medina regarding a system linkage to be brought for Council consideration if discussions are successful. Additionally it is recommended that the necessary zoning amendment be initiated as part of the Highway 12 ordinanceE. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by `, seconded by that Council accept the information regarding water system development and directing staff to work further with Medina to explore the link between the two water systems together with directing staff to make an amendment to the Highway 12 requirements to Planning Commission. Ayes _ , Nays _ CC: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Adminsitrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Dir-:tcr Tom Kuehn, Finance Director 1ABULATION OF FIVE LOW BIDS OF FIVE RECEIVED PROPOSAL FOR TRUNK HWY 12 SANITARY SEWER iI WATER MAIN_ IMPROVEMENTS ORONO MN I hereby certify that this is an PROJECT NO. FILE NO. 13939 exact reproduction of b s recely BID OPENING _11:00 A.M., C_D.S.T., Friday, June 30, 1989 Reg.No. 9451 s r✓ Glenn R. Cook, P.E. 1 ALBRECT EXC. 2 HENNEN CONST. 3 B i D UNDERGROUND 4 LATOUR CONST. 5 BROWN L CRIS PROPOSAL ITEM INC. _ CO. INC. _ INC. INC. Description Quantity Units Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total PART I - SANITARY SEWER 8' PVC, 8'-10' deep in place 200 L.F. 12.00 2,400.00 13.00 8' PVC, 10'-12' deep in place 530 L.F. 1.00 6,360.00 14.00 8' PVC, 12'-14' deep In piece 450 L.F. 14.00 6,300.00 16.00 8' PVC, 14'-16' deep in place 700 L.F. 15.00 10,500.00 18.00 8' PVC, 16-18' deep in place 850 L.F. 17.00 14,450.00 20.00 8' PVC, 18'-20' deep In place 103 L.F. 23.00 2,300.00 23.00 12' DIP, 14'-16' deep in place 45 L.F. 23.00 1,035.00 30.00 Jack casing with 12' DIP carrier in pl. 85 L.F. 120.00 10,200.00 110.00 4' PVC, (SDR 26) force wain 1,380 L.F. 6.00 8,280.00 6.00 Std. MH 8' deep, 4' die., w/16428 cstg. 11 Each 800.00 8,800.00 1,000.00 Manhole depth greater than 8' deep 50 L.F. 60.00 3,000.00 70.01) Cut into existing manhole 1 Each 300.00 300.00 300.00 8' x 6• PVC service wye brerch 5 Each 45.00 225.00 60.00 BT13939\JUN89 2,600.00 16.50 7,420.00 17.00 7,200.00 17.50 12,600.00 18.00 17,000.00 20.00 2,300.00 21.50 1,350.00 28.00 9,350.00 128.00 8,280.00 6.50 11,000.0(1 1,128.00 3,500 DO $5.00 3ri.00 825.00 300.00 50.00 3,300.00 13.65 9,010.00 15.65 7,875.00 18.70 12,600.00 21.99 17,000.00 25.75 2,150.00 30.15 1,260.00 34.70 10,8A0.00 129.90 8,970.00 5.95 12,408.00 1,175.00 2,750.00 60.00 825.0u 560.00 250.00 70.OG 2,730.00 8,294.50 8,415.00 15,330.00 21,887.50 3,015.00 1,561.50 11,041.50 8,211.00 12,925.00 3,000.00 560.00 350.00 14.75 13.35 16.60 18.25 20.60 24.35 36 00 135.00 8.35 900.00 70 50 170.00 47.00 2,950.00 8,135.50 7,470.00 12,775.00 17,510.00 2,435.00 1,620.00 11,475.00 11,523.00 9,900.00 3,525.00 170.00 235.00 PROPOSAL FOR TRUNK NWY 12 SANITARY SEWER L WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS ORONO, MN PAGE 2 PROJECT NO. FILE No. 13939 1 ALBRECT EXC. 2 NENNEN CONST. 3 B & D UNDERGROUND 4 LATOUR CONST. 5 BROWN a CRIS PROPOSAL .ITEM INC. CO. 1NC___ _ INC. INC. PART 1 - SANITARY SEWER. CONT'D 6' PVC service pipe in place 160 L.F. 10.00 1,600.00 9.00 1,440.00 10.00 1,600.00 15.15 2,424.00 11.35 1,816.UO 6' PVC service riser pipe in place 15 L.F. 12.00 180.00 12.00 180.00 50.00 750.00 15.15 227.25 13 50 202.50 Improved pipe foundation per 6' increment depth 600 L.F. 1.50 900.00 2.00 1,200.00 1.20 720.00 1.30 780.00 1.40 840.00 Mechanical trench compaction 1,600 L.F. 0.01 16.00 0.30 480.00 0.10 160.00 0.50 BOO. 00 1.05 1,680.00 Lift Station No. 30 L S L.S. L.S. 36,000.00 L.S. 42,000.00 L.S. 41,295.00 L.S. 42,875.00 L.S. 46,400.00 TOTAL PART 1 - SANITARY SEWER $112,846.00 S128,500.00 %139,803.00 $144,427.25 S140,662.U01 PART 1I_WATER MAIN 6' DIP, Class 52 water main 80 L.F. 11.00 880.00 12.00 960.00 16.50 1,320.00 18.10 1,448.00 18.55 1,484.00 8' DIP, Class 52 water main 2,130 L.F. 13.00 27,690.00 14.00 29,820.00 12.00 25,560.00 13.85 29,5UO.50 13.30 28,329.00 6' resilient wedge gate valve and box 8 Each 340.00 2,720.00 370.00 2,960.00 332.00 2,656.00 310.00 2.480.00 325.00 2,600.00 8' resilient wedge gate valve and box 5 Each 450.00 2,250.00 470.00 2,350.00 439.00 2,1o5.CZ 425.00 2,125.00 460.00 2,300.00 S' valve hydrant 5 Each 1,200.00 6,DDU.00 1,000.00 5,000.00 1' W .00 5,225.00 1,360.00 6.800.00 1,270.00 6,350.00 C.I. fittings 4,500 Lbs. 1.00 4,500.00 1.00 4,500.00 0.80 3,60LI.00 1.00 4,500.UO 0.*K 3,825.00 Cut into 8' plug 1 Each 250.00 250 00 100.00 100.00 381.00 3C; 00 350.00 350.00 95.00 95.00 Mechanical trei,.h compaction 2,200 L.F. 0.01 22.00 0.30 660.00 0.1^ 22J.00 0.50 1,100.00 0.11 242.00 TOTAL PART 11 - WATER MAIN $44,312.00 $46,350.00 51.00 $48,303.50 145,225.00 8113939\JUN89 PROPOSAL FOR TRUNK_ HWY 12 SANITARY SEWER R WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS ORONO, MN PAGE 3 PROJECT NO. _ FILE NO. 13939 1 ALBRECT EXC. 2 HENNEN CONST. 3 8 R D UNDERGROUND 4 LA70UR CONST. 5 BROWN L CRIS PROPOSAL ITEM INC. CO. INC. INC._ INC. PART III - RESTORATION Common excavation 6,000 C.Y. Bituminous surfacing removal 200 S.Y. Class 5 aggregate base (100% Crushed) 400 Ton 2341 bituminous veering surface 100 Ton 2341 bituminous binder surface 200 Ton AC-1 bituminous material for mixture 16 Ton Bituminous material for tack cost 50 Gels Erosion control fence 501) L.F. M : and grub trees 250 Each Sod with 4' topsoil 2,500 S.Y. Seeding w/topsoil, mulch and fertilizer 5 Ac. 107AL PART III - RESTORATION TOTAL PART I - SANITARY SEWER TOTAL PART II - WATER MAIN TOTAL PART III - RESTORATION TOTAL SAS;. BID BT13939\JUNS9 1.00 6,000.00 1.D0 6,000.00 1.15 6,900.00 0.50 3,000.00 1.50 9,000.00 2.00 400.00 1.00 200.00 2.00 400.00 1.75 350.00 1.50 300.00 8.00 3,200.00 12.00 4.800.00 9.50 3,BOO. 00 10.00 4,000.00 9.40 3,760.00 25.00 2,500.00 28.00 2,800.00 28.00 2,800.00 26.25 2,625.00 28.60 2,860.00 25.00 5,000.00 24.00 4.800.00 28.00 5,600.00 26.25 5,250.00 24.95 4,990.00 190.00 3,040.00 150.00 2,400.00 132.00 2,112.00 157.50 2,520.00 131.00 2,096.00 1.00 50.00 2.00 100.00 3.00 150.00 1.05 52.50 2.10 105.00 1.50 7:0.00 2.00 1,ow. 00 2.25 1,125.00 2.00 1,000.00 2.10 1,050.00 75.00 18,75).00 12.00 3,000.00 12.00 3,000.00 40.00 10,n00.00 52.50 13,125.00 2.20 5,500.00 1.50 3,750.00 1.70 4,250.00 1.84 4,600.00 1.67 4,175.00 800.00 4,000.00 850.00 4,250.00 1,150.00 5,750.00 787.50 3,931.50 1,345.00 6,725.00 $49,190.00 $33,100.00 $35,987.00 $37,335.00 $48,186.00 $112,846.00 $128,500.00 $139,803.00 $144,427.25 $140,662.00 44,312.00 46,350.00 41,161.00 48,303.50 45,225.00 49,190.00 33,100.00 35,887.00 37,335.00 48,186.00 $206,348.00 $207,950.00 $216,851.00 $230,065.75 $234.073.00 P.tOPOS& FOR TRUNK HMT 12 SANITARY SEMER 6 WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS OROh , MN PAGE 4 PROJECT NO. FILE NO 13939 1 ALBRECT EXC. 2 HENNEN CONST. 3 B i 0 UNDERGROUND 4 LATOUR CDNST. 5 OR" a CRIS PROPOSAL ITEM INC. CO. INC. INC. INC. •fffffff•fflffffffffff lfffff••lf ffffffffffffffffff11111111.1111f 1f 1f111f111111f••lffffflf•ff1f1f11111f••f/1f lffff if •f 111fff• „ff •f•lffffffflfffffffffff• 010 WHO, CENT. CHECK, CASH DEP. FIRM BY TITLE ADDRESS TELEPHONE N0. ST13939'\JUNB9 CERTIFIED CHECK 5% 5% 5% 51 ALBRECHT EXC. HEMNEN CONST. CO. B S D UNDERGROUND LATOUR CONST. BROYN a CRIS INC. INC. INC, DAVE NAMES HAROLD HENNEN ROBERT FROUARD THEODORE V. LATOUR DOUGLAS R. PAGE VICE PRESIDENT SEC -TREASURER PRES!OERT OMMFR SCCRFTARY 1408 M. CO. RD. t 1452U MAIN ST. 6130 SUNSET DR. MT. 1, BOX 76 19740 KENRICK AVE. ROSEVILLE, MN ROGERS, RN MOUND, MN MAPLE LAKE, FBI LAKEVILLE. FBI 55113 55314 553" 55358 53044 (612) 633-4510 (612) 428-4177 (612) 472-5819 (612) 963-3993 (612) 469-2121 11989.3 r COUNCIL MEETING TO: Mayor and City Council NOV 13 1989 � FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato4 CITY OF ORONO DATE: November 9, 1989 1 SUBJECT: Christmas Lighting - Navarre INTRODUCTION - As a follow-up to the October 23, 1989, Council meeting I meet with Chic Remien of the Westonka Chamber, Pat Osmonson of Spring Park and Ed Shuckle of Mound. Following that meeting I was advised that it would not be feasible to put a package together to place lights th4.s season. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended it be tabled until outside funding of the purchase has been pledged. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by _, the Orono Council table further discussion until such time as the Westonka Chamber has secured appropriate funding contributions. Ayes Nays _ cc: Chic Remein Westonka Area Chamber of Commerce 5600 Lynwood Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 Int.ero+fice Memo Date: November 8, 198Y To: Mark Dernhard--n, City Administrator" From: Mel k.i 1 bo, Chief of Police Re: Bid Process - Weather 5i.ren COUNCIL MEETING NOV 13 1989 CITY OF ORONO On October 1989 at loam, a bid for weather siren was opened. The City received only one bid from Ridgedale Flectric. 524 Brimhall, Long Lake, MN 553.56, for a weather siren +or $18,6V0. I received a call at 2pm on 10/30/89 from another potential bidder, Electric Service Incorporated. Mr-. Jim Peterson, who stated his company just had found their bid on his desk. He e>,pressed interest in bidding on the siren project. My budgeted amount for a weather siren was 41-2.5(it.). which isbelow the bid price given by Pidgedale Electric. 1 there+ore ask the Council to reject the bid received an basis of only one bid received, also that amount budgeted in 19BH and 1989 is not adequate to cover the cost o+ the siren. I intend to rebid in first part of 199t► as I have additional funds budgeted in 1994) to cover cost. of sirens. Informal quotes received in June, 1989, rev -led a cobL of $16,825 for the same installation. Additionally. Electric Service Incorp. indicated they, if given the chance to bid aqain, would be able to lower their bid. ro: Mayor and City Council . •.uPi: Mart: Bernhardson, City Administrate' Forwarded. recommending approval. PROPOSED MO(IUN - Moved by --_, seconded by___, that the Orono Council re iect all bids for the installation Of the Emergency Preparedness Siren. Ayes____. Nays____. COUNCIL ME (7 NOV 1319b., To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson CITY OF ORG.r_ Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth From: Lyle Oman, Building Inspector Date: November 6, 1989 Subject: 1949 Fagerness Point Road - Hazardous Building Proceedings Staff is requesting Council to review the above subject property for Hazardous Building Action. Council adopted Resolution #t2713 on September 25, 1989 requiring the securing and repair of structures at 1949 Fagerness Point Road. My firs visit to the property was after this resolution was passed when I met on the site with a representative of the owners to discuss the required repairs. During this meeting I found another section of foundation to be cracked, bowed and in danger of collapse. The resolution has been rewritten to include this section of foundation and to supersede Resolution #2713. There are four options that can be tr.ken: 1. Table proceedings; 2. Adopt resolution as written; 3. Adopt resolution with amendments; 4. Deny resolution. Staff recommends adopting the resolution as is and commencing with Hazardous Building Action. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION FINDING A HAZARDOUS BUILDING AND REQUIRING THE SECURING AND REPAIR OF STRUCTURES AT 1949 FAGSRNESS POINT ROAD, ORONO THIS RESOLUTION HEREBY SUPERSEDES RESOLUTION #2713 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Steven Davis is the fee owner of record of property located at 1949 Fagerness Point Road, Orono, Minnesota, herein referred to as "the property", and legally described as follows: Property Identification Number: 18-117-23 14 0016 Lots 23 and 24 including accretions described as follows: commencing at most northerly corner of Lot 24, -hence south- westerly to most westerly corner thereof, thence southeasterly at a deflecting angle to the left of 60 degrees 36 minutes to the south line of under the the Linden Avenue said point being the actual point of beginning, thence continued southeasterly on said angle line a distance of 61.05 feet thence northeasterly to a point in the Extension southerly of east line of Lot :3 distance 57.05 feet south from sout.i line of under the Linden Avenue thence northerly along east line of Lot 23 extenk-11:d to south line of said avenue, thence westerly along said south line to beginning, Fagerness, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orone, having duly considered the matter pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 463.15 to 463.261, hereby finds that the above described property is uninhabitable and contains unsanitary and hazardous conditions which constitute a public nuisance and which makes this property hazardous to the public health, safety and welfare based on the following finCings: 1. Basement wall backplastered over dirt for foundation wall, northwest corner. Three-quarters of northwest wall is of 2 tier construction and is cracked and severely bowed. 2. Basement wall caving in at cellar door. 3. Improper beam support over doorway in basement. 4. Electrical wiring to florescent lights - improper installation (use of light -gage speaker wire). Page 1 of 5 City of OR,ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL stove on second floor installed without permit and have proper clearances. 6. Outlet covers missing or broken. 7. Roof leaks and appears that water is ponding around light fixtures. 6: Improper installation of roofing on flat roof. Rolled roofing used. Water ponding on roof. 9. No flashing installed on roof in valleys. 10. Sheet rock sagging in northwest room clue to leaking roof. 11. Water stains around light fixture in kitchen. 12. Water damage to ceiling, northwest corner in bathroom. 13. Bathroom (first floor) water stains on ceiling around light fixtures. 14. Water stains around ceiling light fixtures in northwest room, second floor. 15. Mildew on walls and ceilings in northwest corner room, qp -tend floor. 16. Impropiz stairway width to basement. 17. Electrical wiring to light fixture by lake is improperly secured. 18. Rim joist insulation needed. Garage - 19. Roof collapsing on tr- south side. 20. Wall rotten half way up on the south side giving poor support to the roof. 21. Electrical wiring unsafe. 22. Some damage from fire on August 7, 1989. Page 2 of 5 City of ORONO o�Building is dilapidation, thus it is Minnesota State Building RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. in a state: of deterioration and a safety and health hazard pursuant to Code/Uniform Building Code, Section 203. OrderL to remove or repair the structure were issued by the Building Official on August 30, 1988 and August 21, 1989. These or:lers have not been complied with. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows: A) That the City Council of the cy (if Orono, pursuant to State Statute 463.251, hereby orc rs the owner(s) to board - up and secure the garage structure within ten (10) days The City Council further orders that unless corrective action is taken within ten (10) days from the date of service of this order, it will result in the City properly securing the building and the cost thereof will be charged against the real estate as pro,,ided in State Statute Section 463.21. B ) The City Council of the City of Orono, pursuant to the foregoing findings and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Sections 463.15 to 463.261 hereby orders the owner(s) of the property to make the following repair in order to correct the hazardous condition: 1. Remove backplaster which covers dirt and entire section of 2 tier fovndaticn and provide proper foundation per Minnesota State Buildi.-.g Code on wall in the northwest corner and three-quarters of northwest wall. 2. Remove all debris from w:-tlt caved in at cellar dooz and provide proper foundation wall per Minnesota State Building Code. 3. provide proper beam support over doorway in basement. 4 Remove flourescent light wirinq and provide proper wiring to these lights in basement. 5. Remove wood stove/secure permit for installation/install per Minnesota ✓tate Building Code. 6. Provide outlet covers for all outlets. Paqe 3 of 5 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _ Remove existing roof covering and provide new roof covering per Minnesota State Building Code. 8. Provide proper roofing on f lat roof. 9. Provide proper flashing n roof valleys with the replacement c.i the roof covering. i0. Remove sheetrock that is sagging in northwest corner room and replace. 11. Have master electrician check out li,, c fixture in kitchen to verify no fire hazard exists. 12. Remove water damaged sheetrock on ceiling and northwest corner in bathroom and reo'_ace. 13. Have master electrician check out ceiling light fixtures in first floor bathroom to verify no fire hazard exists. 14. Have master electrician check ceiling outlet fixtures in northwest room on second floor to verify no fire hazard exists. 15 Remove :,neetrock on walls any verify no damage to stud walls in northwest corner room, second floor. i6. Remove stairway and provide ne% opening with proper width to basement stairwell. 17. Have electrician re -install or remove ligth fixtures by lake so that it is properly secured and is not a h,_ zard . 16. Provide rim joist insulation in basement. Garage - 19. Roof collapsing on south side - remove and replace roof structure. 20. Remove rotten wall on south side and replace. Also, replace the roof above. 21. Have master electrician remove all electrical wiring and re -:lace in a safe conlition. rage 4 of 5 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. nwr.er(s) should submit plans on how he is to repair damage caused by fire on August 7, 1989 d?id must make corrections per Minnesota State Building Code. 23. Owner(s) must maintain property so as not to cause a safety or healt.,i hazard. If the repairs are not completed or unless an answer is filed within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, the City shall move the District Court for summary enforcement of this order. Tf an answer is filed to contest the hazardous building action, the matter shall be tried and decided by the Cistrict Court. If th-2 order is sustained by the Court, the Court shall affix a time after which the building s'iall be destroyed or repaired as sat forth in Minnesota Statute Section 463.20. Tf the course judgement is not complied with in the time prescribed, the City may make the repairs, raze or remove the hazardous condition or building or acqui:e the building and real estate on which the 'ouilding or hazardous condition is located by eminent domain. The necessary costs -)f such repairs, razing or remova including but not limited to attorney fees, witness fees and firing fees shall be a lean against the real estate on which the hazardous condition exists and will be levied against the property as set forth in Minnesota Statutes Section 463.21 and 463.22. "'hat the City Council of the City of Orono hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor, City Cle•.k, City Attorney, and other off icers and employees of the Cite to take s,.ch action, prepare, sign and serve such papers as are necessary to comply with this order and to assess the cost thereof against thy. real estate described above for collection along with taxes. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, this 13th day of November, 1989. APPROVED: ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City —clerk Page 5 of 5 11689.2 COUNCIL MEETING NOV 13 1989 TO: Mayor and City Council CITY OF ORONO FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrate) DATE: November 6, 1989 SUBJECT: Assessing Services ISSUE Updating the Council regarding the status of request for proposals received for a contract assessor. INTRODUCTION - As you may be aware the staff had submitted a request for proposal tc interested parties and with a deadline of November 3, 1989. DISCUSSION - Staff has received fo:r proposals for assessing service. These will be reviewed during the next two weeks and a recommendation is expected to be prese,-ted to the Council for initiation of se -vice at the Council's November 27, 1989 meeting. ar.rrrOMATTVrC — 1. Accept the informatirn as presented. 2. Table for considera.:.ion to the November 27, 1989. RECOMMENDATION - It i� recommended teat the Council accept the information update and -hat issue be tabled until tr,-� November 27, 1989 meeting. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that the Counci accept the information presented, tabling consideration until November 27 1989 ir--eting. Ayes _, Nays _ 11989.2 TO: Mayor and City Council. FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Adm, nistrato��i� DATE: November 9, 1989 SUBJECT: Wayzata Country Club/Hauser Road Agreement - Resolution COUNCIL MEETING NOV 13 1989 CITY OF ORONO Attachment: A. Proposed Resolution ISSUE - The attached resolai.ion ack-. _.jes agreement between t ie Hause-s and the Wayzata Country t- LUL .>f the nut lot road as discussed at the October 23, 1989 Council meeting. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, the adopt resolution $_ relating to agreement of outlot road. Ayes Nays _ wASMINaTON. 0. C. 110036 •W.tt 300 SOUT-1 1&00 M •faktC7, M.w. ►eLco-o"aROM-41e•6aoo •CIecoosca toa-61e•l71e POPHAM, HAIK, SCHNOaR1CH & KAUFMAN, LTD. 3300 PIPtA JArrAAT TOwtn MINNEAPOLIS, FIINNESOYA 5540Z Yc�c,•1.a1< •1>t•333•.a 00 ICLCCOPIcn url e.:•3a• :+01 1211 •.t•». 7:01 t2iner-T DIAL NUMBER (612) 334-2781 SENT FROM 32nd FLOOR TELECOPIER TO: Mark $er3b*rd5on -- TELECOPIER NUMBER: 473-0510 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 473--7357 FROM: Kathleen M. Martin DATE: November 9, 1989 AUTHORIZATION HUHRER: _ FILE NUMBYR: 3643-047 NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: ORIGINAL COPY TO FOLLOW BY MAIL: YES NO x ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: TO: Mark B., Jack T., Larry B., and Craig M.: OCNvest.COlOIt.►Do e0201 fv1*C 4.00 1800 SC.CN?CCMf.N G1n«7 1cf6c"O••C 1102-493.1800 IfLeCOPICR Congratulations! I am pleased to enclose the final draft of the resolution/agreement, which incorporates the to!visions ws have all discussed by phone there past two days. The same will be incorporated in the agenda packets for Monday evening's council meeting (to be mailed this afternoon). I suggest that the resolution be executed by the city officials on Monday evening, with arrangements for execution by the ?ausers and Mr. Lauer on Tuesday and by the Country Club on Wednesday. It has been a pleasure to work with you all, and I thank you for your patience and cooperation. --K9thy M. • IF THERE ARE ANY PROBLEMS WITH T11IS TRANSMISSION, PLEASE CALL AT (612) 334- 2654 Marie 7.1 ' `7 i!at�=`�w+�`XCa� City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. RES01UTI05 Mo. A RESOLUTION[ A,lI MING RESOLUTION NO. 2685 GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL FOR M HAUMM LAUER WCC ADDITION PLAT, AMENDING CONDITIOPS FOR PTRAL APPROVAL AND FILING File No. 1326 WHEREAS, on August 28, 1989, through Resolution No. 2685, the Orono City Council granted final approval of the proposed plat of HAUSER LAUER WCC ADDITION; and WHEREAS, said final approval was conditioned upon several items to be completed, including a requirement that: a road and utility easement be granted to the City of Orono, over a portion of an existing Load and other property along the northerly edge of the proposed plat, the proposed easement area to be identified on the plat as "Outlots B and C"; and WHEREAS, Ronald D. Lauer, single (hereinafter referred to as "Developer"), Leopold A. Hauser III and Helen B. Hauser, husband and wife (hereinafter referred to collectively as "Hauser and Wayzata Country Club, a Minnesota non-profit corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Country Club") have found that collectively, they are unable to grant an unencumbered road and utility easement to the City of Orono due to the prier existing grant of an access easement affe' ;ng portions of Outlots B and C, which access easement im in fa• owners; ana iumerous affected property City of OR,ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. WHEREAS, the City of Orono, the Developer, Hauser and Country Club wish to allow the filing of the proposed plat of HAUSER LAUER WCC Addition to complete the platting process and still allow the property owners and the public suitable access to the property proposed to be platted and the property benefitted by the prior existing grant of access easement for ingress and egress. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The D-sveloper, Hauser and the appropriate officers of the Country Club will grant, to the City of Orono, road and utility easements over the northerly 25 feet of the property proposed to be platted as HAUSER LAUER WCC ADDITION, and more particularly described as Outlots B and C of said addition, utilizing the presently existing form of easement grant approved by the City of Orono. 2. Upon receipt of the executed roar: and '_ity easements, the City of Orono shall file the easements when the plat aad other appropriate plat documents are recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder. 3. Should. the City Administrator and/or the city ccuncil, at a later date, determine the public need requires the construction of a road over all or any part of the road and utility easements, the City Administrator shall give written notice to the Developer. Hauser, Country Club ann/or their successors and assigns to the extent that they then retain any interest in Outlots B and/or C. The notice shall be in the form of a letter from the City City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Air, shall be sent postage prepaid, by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, shall be deemed delivered not later than the third day after the same was deposited in the mail, and shall allow each party retaining any fee or contract for deed purchasers' interest in said Outlots six months time from the date of the letter to deed by quit claim deed unencumbered fee title of said partv's interest in and to Outl.ots B and C HAUSER LAUER WCC ADDITION, to the City of Orono, provided however that the prior access easement, originally granted in 1956, will rsma.1- an encumbrance against Outlots B and C. Simultaneous with delivery of the deeds conveying outlots B and C to the City, eac'i grantor shall deliver standard form sellers' affidavits and a title insurance commitment to the City of Orono, naming the City of Orr.no as the proposed insured, evidencing good title to the portion of outlots B and C owned Ly each party, subject only to the existing access agreement granted in 1956 and the existing gas pipeline easement in favor of the Minneapolis Gas Company, vested in the party delivering such conveyance. In the event that any of said parties, or their successors or assigns fails to comply, and a court requires said party to do so, said party shall be liable for all costs and attorneys' fees incurrea by the City of Orono in enforcing this agreement against said party. Notwithstanding the f:regoing it is understood and agreed that the City of Orono shall be responsible for the paymQnt of all costs and expenses incurred in connection with the issuance of any commitment for title insurance and the issuing of any t"itle policies in connection therewith. It is further understood that City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CGUNCIL NO. the obligations of Hauser, Lauer and/or WCC as expressed in this resolution are not joint and several, but are individual and several only, and that under no circumstances will any costs or damages incurred by the City of Orono by reason of the failure of one or the other of Hauser, Lauer and/or WCC to comply with '.he terms and provisions of this resolution be recovered from any one or more of said parties who have complied with the terms of this resolution as it may affect the real property owned and controlled by such ^-zty or parties. 4. Upon the receipt of executed deeds from the appropriate property owners, the City shall immediately file the deeds W. begin preparation for construction of the road. The road shall. be completed within a reasonable period of time following the receipt and filing of the deeds from the appropriate parties. 5. When constructed, the center line of the road shall he the northerly line of Gutlots H and C, HAUSER LAUER WCC ADDITION as platted. 6. The width of the road shall be determined by the City of Orono, pursuant to then existing reasonable standards applicable to reasonably similar properties in the City of Orono benefitted by similar roads. Should the City Administrator acting under such then existing reasonable standards determine that the full. 25 foot width of Outlots R and C, HAUSER LAUER WCC ADDITION is not required for the road or maintenance or repair thereof after initial construction thereof, the Mayor and Ca:)- Clerk shall execute one or City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. more quit claim deeds in favor of each of Leveloper, Hauser and Country Club (and/or their successors and assigns) covering those portions of the road formerly conveyed by each, on behalf of the City of Orono, for portions of Outlots B and C not needed for the road or maintenance or repair thereof. In said quit claim deeds the City may reserve to itself public utility easements encumbering such reconveyed property. In making such conveyances back to each of the affected parties, the City of Orono, by resolution duly adopted by its City Council, shall specifically waive application of the City of Orono subdivision ordinances in such a manner to perm: such reconveyances to be filed of record 144thout the need for platting or complying with City of Orono subdivision requirements. 7. The granting of fee title to Outlots B and C in favor of the City shall be subject to a reservation of easement in favor of Developer, Hauser and Country Club for ingress :..-.a egress over the premises conveyed until construction of the road is completed. 8. After the road has been completed, Developer, Hauser And Country Club and their successors and assigns, to the a ent that each owns fee title to land abutting Outlots B and/or C, or any part thereof retained and used by the City of Orono for road and utility purposes, shall have and retain the right of ingress to and egress from their own property over portions of Outlots B and/or C owned by the City of Orono for access to and use of the public road constructed by the City of Orono over and across said Outlots 9 and/or C or any part thereof. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. NO. 9. Developer, Hauser and Country Club agree to the terms of this Resolution and the filing of this Resolution with the Hennepin County Recorder and/or Registrar of Titles as a part and parcel of the filing package for the final plat of HAUSER LAUER WCC ADDITION. Developer, Hauser, Country Club and the City covenant and agree that the terms of this resolution shall be binding upon themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns. Approved By The City Council , 1989 ATTEST: City Clerk Leopold A. Hauser Dated: --- Helen D. Hauser Dated: Mayor WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB BY: --- Its Ronald D. Lauer Dated: ** 80 ** ST4d= NESOTA ) } COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) City of ORONO SS. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC!L NO. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1989, by the Mayer and City Clerk, respectively, and of the CITY OF ORONO, a Minnesota municipal corporation, end said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESUTA ) s' COUNTY OF HENNF.PIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1589, by Ronald D. Lauer, a single person. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1989, by Leopold A. Hauser, III and Helen H. Hauser, husband and wife. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1989, by --- the of WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB, a Minnesota nen-profit corporation, on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public 116^9. 3 COUNCIL MEETING NOV 13 1J- TO: Mayor and City Council CITY OF ORONO FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrate` p-',,,�, DATE: November 6, 1989 SUBJECT: Drug Awareness Resistance Education Status ISSUE - Providing an update to the Council regarding the status of the DARE program with the Orono school. INTRODUCTION - At the Council's October 23, 1989, Council meeting it was requested that status be provided regarding the DARE program. A written request was made to the School District regarding progress to date. (There is a death in the family of Superintendent Mich Juring the week of October 30th and this may be presenting a delay in response.) DISCUSSION - In a telephone conversation with Superintendent Mich it was indicated that they are working on a response and hope to be able to respond in the next couple of weeks. ALTERNATIVES - 1. Accept the information provided. 2. 'table for further discussion. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended the issue be tabled until the November 27, 1989 meeting. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the Council accept the information regarding the status of the DARE program inquiry. Ayes Nays ___ 11689.5 COUNCIL MEETING NOV 13 1989 T0- ;Mayor and City Council ft� FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrate CITY OF CiRONQ DATE: November 6, 1989 SUBJECT: County Road 116 - Environmental Assessment Workz7heet Attachment: A. County Road 116 EAR Dated 10/18/89 ISSUE - Presentation to the Council of the environmental assessment worksheet prepared by Hennepin County for any comments that they would like to make Either individually or through the City. INTRODUCTION - The County Road 116 project does require the County —t- to an environmental assessment worksheet. This will be the basis for determining if an environmental impact statement is needed. Comments need to be presented on this by November 29, 1989. DISCUSSION - In the initial staff review there does not seem to be any sigr.iticant items in the construction of ti:e project that the City was not previously aware. ALTERNATIVES 1. Accept the information as presented. 2. Make any comments that the Council would like the City to respond with. 3. Make individual comments. 4. Table for the November 27, 1989 meeting. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the CcunciI accept the information as presented and after any comments twat they would like the City to make, make individual comments as they choose. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved ;:.i —, seconded by that the Council acknowledge receipt of .tt+K environmental assessment worksheet for County Road 1_ 1 6. Ayes _, Nays __ cc: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WGi KS Engineering Division { 320 Washington Ave. South HENNEPIN Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 Phone: (612) 935-3381 October 13, 1969 Mr. Mark E. Bernhardson City Administratir City of Orcno P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJECT 7735 COUNTY ROAD 116 Dear Mr. Bernhardson: Please find one copy of the Enviroimental Assessment Worksheet for the above rF--enced project. Sq�k ncerely, Bruce M. Polaczyk, P.E. Design Engineer OW:mak Enclosure HENNEPIN COUNTY can equal Oppotlu i y rMC)IOvef Note: An Iodirect Source° Perc.it is not requi,ed because the project 3oes not meet the threshold limits for increased traffic flow. 12. IS THr PROPOSED PROJECT INCON:1STSNT WITH THE LOCAL ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN OR ANY OTHER ADOPTED PLANS' X NO YES IF YES, EXPLAIN: 13. OESCRIP' CURRENT AND RECENT PAST LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT ON AND NEAR THE SITE Resent developments in the area have included residential and recreational areas it keeping with the Land Use Plans for the Cities of Medina er.d Orono. 14. APPROXIMATELY HOW MANY ACRES OF THL SITE ARE IN EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES? (ACREAGES SHOULD ADD UP 10 TOTAL PROJECT AREA BEFORE AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION.) BEFORE "SR BEFORE AFTER FOREST/WOODED 7.2 0 WETLANO (TYPES 3-8) 0.2 0 CROPLAND 3.7 0 IMPERVIOUS SUR; CE 10.5 28.4 BRUSH/GRASFLAND 39.0 d0.2 OTHER (GRAVEL ROAD) 8.0 0 (URBAN VACANT) PARK 0.0 0.0 TOTALS 68.6 68.6 13. DESCRIBE THE SOILS ON THE SITE. GIVING 1-HE SCS SOIL CLASSIFICATION T'.1PES, IF KNOWN. See Exhibit E 16. DOES THE SITE CONTAIN PEAT SO.LS, HIGHLY ERODIBLE SOILS, CI"FP SLOPES, SINKHOLES. SHALLOW LIMESTONE FORMATIONS, ABANDONED WELLS, OR ANY G't iC HAZARDS? IF YES, SHOW ON SITE MAP AND EXPLAIN: NO X _ YES Peat soils exist in the wetland areas within th s project which may he excavated for the roadbed. The use of fabric is being considered as a me`.hod to reduce the amount of excavation. 17. WHAT IS THE APPROXIMATE DEPTH (IN FEET) TO: A. GROUNDWATcR 3 ft MIN. AVG. /. aEOFJCK MIN. AVG. ove, 50 Ft. W DOES ANY PART OF THE PROJECT AREA INVOLVE: A. SHORELANC ZONING DISTRICT? X NO _ YES B. DE'TNEATEO 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAINT NO X _ YES C STATE OR FEDERALLY OESIGNAZEO RIVER LAND USE DISTRICT? --T— NO YcS -3- IF YES, IDENTIFY WATER BODY AND APPLICABLE STATE CLASSIFICATION(S), AND DESCRIBE MEASURES TO PROTECT WATER AND RELATED LAND RESOURCES: Elm Creek Watershed Flood Plain Minnehaha Creek Watershed Flood Plain Minimum elevation for the new roadway will be at least 3 feet above the 100 year flood elevation at eacr location. Drainage culverts shall be large enough as to not impede the natural flow of surface water under the roadway. 19. DESCRIBE ANY PHYSICAL ALTERATION (E.G., DIKES, EXCAVATION, FILL, STREAM DIVERSION) OF ANY DRAINAGE SYSTEM, LAKE, STREAM, AND/OR WETLAND. DESCRIBE MEASURES TO MINIMIZE IMPAIRMENT OF THE WATER -RELATED RESOURCES. ESTIMATE QUANTITY OF MATERIAL TO BE DREDGED AND INDICATE WHERE SPOILS WILL BE DEPOSITED. Approximately 600 C.Y. of material could be removed from Wetland No. 4r which is approximately 2,300 feet southerly of Hamel Road. An additional 1,400 C.Y. of material could be removed from Crosby Creek, a Type 2 wetland located approxi- mately feet southerly of CSAH 24. An alternative which is under considera- tion is the use of fal,ric in the roadbed. This would significantly reduce or eliminate altogether the need to remove soils. Drainage cul�,ctLt; will be used, when necessary, to continue the natural flow in these areas. Deposit of ary excess materials will be done in accordance with the Department of Natural Resources and Army Corps of Engineers regulations. 20. a. WILL THE PROJECT REQUIRE AN APPROPRIATION OF GROUN: _.R SURFACE WATER? IF YES, EXPLAIN (I!4ulCATE QUANT TY AND SOURCE): X _ NO _ YES b. WILL THE PROJE�, AFFECT GRO )WATER LEVELS lv ANY WELLS (ON OR OFF THE SITE)? IF YES, EXPLAIN: X NO YES 2: DESCRIBC ;A[ EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES TO BE USED DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTI�14 Or THE PROJECT. Silt fe.i,;es r-id st,ae bale check dams will be used to control erosion during construction. Eodding and :seeding on bare soils will be accomplished as soon as practical fo11oM'r+u _anstrui_ion. Ditch slopes shall be shaped and rounded to minimize erosion. 22. a. WILL THE PROJECT GENERATE: 1. SURFACE AND STORM WATER RUNOFF? NO X_ YES 2. SANITARY WASTEWATER? _ X NO YES 3. INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER? NO _ _ YES 4. COOLING WATER (CONTACT AND NONCONTAC )? X NO _ YES IF YES, IDENTIFY SOURCES, VOLUMES, QUALITY (IF OTHER THAN NORMAL DOMESTIC SEWAGE, AND TREATMENT METHODS. GIVE THE BASIS OR METHODOLOGY OF ESTIMATES. Storm water runoff will increase a� a result of the increase in impervious roadway surface -4- b. IDENTIFY RECEIVING WATER, INCLUDING GROUNDWATER, AND EVALUATE THE IMPACTS OF THE DISCHARGES LISTED ABOVE, IF DISCHARGES TO GROUNDWATER ARE ANTICIPATED, PROVIDE PERCOLATION/PERMEABILITY AND OTHER HYOROGEOLOGICAL TEST DATA, IF AVAILABLE. Storm water runoff will be redirected along roadway ditches unt'l it can resume its natural drainage pattErn. 23. WILL THE PROJECT GENERA'E (EITHER DURING OR AFTER CONSTRUCTION): A. AIR POLLUTION X NO YES B. DUST? NO X YES C. NOISE? NO X YES D. ODORS? X NO YES IF YES, EXPLAIN, INCLUDING AS APPROPRIATE: DISTANCES TO SENSIT:VE LANC USES; EXPECTED LEVELS AND DURATION OF NOISE; TYPES AND QUANTITIES OF AIR POLLUTANTS FROM STACKS, MOBILE SOURCES, AND FUGITIVE EMISSIONS (DUST); ODOR SOURCES; AND MITIGATIVE MEASURES FOR ANY IMPACTS. GIVE THE BASIS OR METHODOLOGY OF ESTIMATES. 23a. The air quality impact of the proposed improvement has been analyzed, the proposed improvement is not anticipated to have significant air quality impacts and is considered to be consistent with the approved State Implemen- tation Plan. Prior consultation with the "innesota Pollution Control Agency as required by paragraph 66(b) of the FHWA'� Interior Air Quality Guidelines is considered to have been accomplished and is documented in arir' by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency/Minnesota Department of Highways Memorandum of Understanding. 23b. Fugitive or wind blown dust generated by construction wi,l be of a temporary nature and will be controlled by watering. 23c. See attached noise study (Exhibit G). 24. DESCRIBE THE TYPE AND AMOUi, OF SOLID AND/OR HAZARDOUS WASTE INCLUDING SLUDGES AND ASHES THAT WILL BE GENERATED AND THE METHOD AND LOCATION OF DISPOSAL: Not app,icable 25. WILL THE PROJECT AFFECT: A. FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITATE, OR MOVEMENT OF ANIMALS? _ NO X YES B. ANY NATIVE SPECIES THAT ARE OFFICIALLY LISTED AS STATE ENDANCERED, THREATENED, OR OF SPECIAL CONCERN (ANIMALS AND/OR PLANTS)? X NO YES IF YES, EXPLAIN (IDENTIFY SPECIES AND DESCRIBE IMPACT): the roadway will pass along the edge of wetland No. 483, a Type III DNR wetland. The size of this wetland is approximately 4 acres (see Exhibit C, page 2) It will also cross Crosby Creek, which is a Type II Army Corps of Engineers wetlan, These wetlands were classified by a joint field study conducted by the Department of Natural Resources and Hennepin County Department of Public Works. Type III wetlands are commonly used as nesting and feeding areas for wildlife. -5- 26, DO ANY HISTORICAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES EXIST ON OR NEAR THE PROJECT SITE? IF YES, EXPLAIN (SHOW RESOURCES ON A SITE MAP XND ONOCRI3E IMPACT)• The State Historic Preservation Officer has stated that the project location has no recorded sites of architectural, historic, cultural or engineering significance and that while no known archeological sites are within the project area, further study will be conducted. (See Exhibit F). 27, WILL THE PROJECT CAUSE THE IMPAIRMENT OR DESTRUCTION OF: A. DESIGNATED PARK OR RECREATION AREAS? X NO NO YES X YES 8, PRIME OR UNIQUE FARMLANDS? X NO YES C. ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE AREAS? X NO YES D. SCENIC VIEWS AND VISTAS? X NO YES E. OTHER UNI:UZ RESOURCES (SPECIFY)? IF YES, EXPLAIN: Based upon the types of soils in the area, 11.7 acres of land along the proposed CR 116 alignment is classified as either prime farmland or farmlands of statewide importance. However, 8 acres have already been utilized for existing roads. The remaining 3.7 acres of affected farmland occurs along the proposed new alignment. Prime and important farmlands occur throughout this area. Therefore, an alignment change would be ineffective to avoid this situation. 26. FOP. EACH AFFECTED ROAD, INDICATE THE CURRENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT), INCREASE IN AOT CONTRIBUTED BY THE PROJECT AND THE DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF TRAFFIC. The current (1986-87) ADT for Willow Drive and Medina Road are 1,437 vpd and 77 vpd respectively. The projected 2010 ADT fur CR 116 range from 2000 vpd to 3000 vpd. See attached Transportation Analysis for details (Exhibit H). 29. ARE ADEQUATE UTILITIES AND PUBIC SERVICE NOW AVAILABLE TO SERVICE THE PROJECT? IF NOT, WHAT ADDITIONAL UTILITIES AND/OR SERVICES WILL BE REQUIRED? X YES SUMMARY OF ISSUES: FOR REGULAR EAWS, LIST THE ISSUES AS IDENTIFIED BY 'YES" ANSWERS ABOVE, DISCUSS ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATIVE MEASURES FOR THESE ISSUES. FOR SCOPING EAWS, LIST KNOWN ISSUES, ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATIVE MEASURES TO BE ADDRESSED IN EIS. 16. Peat removed from the roadbed will be disposed of in a suitable manner. 18b. Minimum elevations for the new roadway will be at least 3 feet above the 100 year flood elevation at each location. Drainage culverts shall be large enough to continue the na*ural flow of surface water under the new roadway. 22a. The surface and storm water runoff will be redirected along roadway ditches until it can resume it's natural drainage Dattern. -6- E.R. 1 (filed in by EQB) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET (EAW) MARK APPROPRIATE BOX: X REGULAR EAW SCOPING EAW NOTE TO REVIEWERS: FOR REGULAR EAWS, WRITTEN COMMENTS SHOULD ADDRESS THE ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF THE EAW INFORMATION, POTENTIAL IMPACTS THAT MAY WARRANT INVESTI- GATION AND/OR THE NEED FOR AN EIS. FOR SCOPING EAWS, WRITTEN COMMENTS SHOULD ADDRESS THE ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF THE INFORMATION AND SUGGEST ISSUES FOR INVESTIGATION 1N THE EIS. SUCH COMMENTS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT UNIT (RGU) DURING THE 30-DAY PERIOD FOLLOWING NOTICE OF THE EAW'S AVAILABILITY IN THE EQB MONITOR. CONTACT THE EQB (METRO: 612/296-8233; NON -METRO: 1-800-652-9747, ASK FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROGRAM) OR THE RGU TO FIND OUT WHEN THE 30-DAY COMMENT PERIOD ENDS, 1, PROJECT NAME: Hennepin County Project No. 7735, County Road 116 2. PROPOSER: Hennepin County Department of Public Works CONTACT PERSON: Bruce M. Polaczyk, P.E. ADDRESS: 320 Washington Avenue South, Hopkins, MN 55343 PHONE: (612)935-3381 3. RGU: Hennepin County Department of Public Works CONTACT PERSON: Bruce M. Polaczyk, P.E. AND TITLE: Design Sect,on Engineer ADDRESS: 320 Washington Avenue South, Hopkins, MN 55343 PHONE: (612)935-3381 4. PROJECT LOCATION: Sections 11, 12. 13, 14, 15, 21, 22, 23, 27, 28, 33 and 34 of Township 118 North, Range 23 West. A. COUNTY NAME: Hennepin County CITY/TOWNSHIP NAME: Cit4es of Medina and Orono B. ATTACH COPIES OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING TO THE EAW: 1. A COUNTY MAP SHOWING THE GENERAL AREA OF THE PROJECT, See Exhibit A in addendum. 2. A COPY(IES) OF USGS 7-1/2 MINUTE, 1:24,000 SCALE MAP. See Exhibit B in eddendum 3. A SITE PLAN SHOWING THE LOCATION OF FIGNIFICANT FEATURES SUCH AS RPnaOSED STRUCTURES, ROADS, EXTENT OF FLOOOPLAIN, WETLANDS, WELLS, ETC. -1- S See Exhibit C in addendum. 4. AN EXISTING LAND USE MAP AND A ZONING MAP OF THE IMMEDIATE AREA, IF AVAILABLE. fee Exhibit D in addendum. DESCRIBE THE PROPOSED PROJECT COMPLETELY. The proposed project is the construction of a new segment of County Road (CR) 116 as a two lane rural highway with 24 feet of bituminous driving surface and 8 foot bituminous shoulders with ditches within an 80 foot right of way corridor. The propused alignment for CR 116 begins at the intersection of Trunk Highw.y (TH) 12 and Willow Drive; thence runs northerly along the existing roadbed of Willow Drive for 1.7 miles; thence curves noitneaster'y along a new alignment for 0.3 miles matching 'in with the existing roadbed of Medina Road; thence runs northeasterly along inplace Medina Road for 1.8 miles; thence curving northerly along a new alignment for 1.2 miles to the intersection of Pinto Drive and Hamel Roao: thence along the existing roadbed of Pinto Drive for 0.1 miles to Tower Drive and the end of the proposed project. This southerly extension of CR 116 will serve as a minor arterial roadway providing a needed north -south route through the Cities of Medina and Orono. 6. REASON FOR EAW PREPARATION: Construction of a road on a new location over 1 mile in length. LIST ALL MANDATORY CATEGCRY RULE O'S WHICH APPLY: 6MCAR 53.038U.1 7. ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST B. TOTAL ?ROJECT AREA (ACRES) $2,846,000 (not including right of way costs). 68.6 AC OR LENGTH IN (MILES): 5.1 9. NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS: N'A OR COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL OR INSTITUTIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE: N/A 10. NUMBER OF PROPOSED PARKING SPACES: N/A 11. LIST ALL KNOWN LOCAL, STATE AND rEDERAL PERMITS/APPROVALS/FUNDING REQUIRED: Level of Government Federal: U.S. Army Corp of Engineers State: Minn. Dept. of Natural Resources Local: City of Medina City of Orono Type of Application Status 404 Permit Pending Wetland Permit Pending Plan Approval Pending Plan Approval Pending -2- 23b. Fug4tive or wind blown dust generated by construct;on will be of a temporary nature and will be controlled by watering. 23c. See attached noise study (Exhibit G). 25a. The project will be coordinateed with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. If required, necessary wetland mitigation will be pursued. 27b. The affected farmlands occur throughout this area, therefore an alignment change would be ineffective to mitigate this situation. CERTIFICATION BY RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENTAL UNIT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS TRUE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND THAT COPIES OF THE COMPLETE EAW HAVE BEEN MADE AVAILABLE TO ALL POINTS ON THE OFFICIAL EOB DISTRIBUTION LIST. SIGNATURE: �` `` _ DATE: TITLE: Director, Hennepin County Department of Public works -7- i i�.w. w t i e EXHIBIT A Hennepin Count: Minnesota LAW" V v .weemm PROPOSED PROJECT (All r•"N GENERAL INDEX MA P • f ' WT EXHIBIT B - ' •� - ■ ■ ■ I■ ■ ■ PROPOSED PROJECT-- �c.o —�✓7.! • + _ - e 1 • + + ( '1 � dw�G► �• .` �. + ., 1, � �' • � -- . !� 1 '�- • !L+ � air . _+ 1 I • --� (�"/�^' � � S Sao wor cl 10 Ez ✓ ♦ ' '• • • ' I ' !ri CD JF cG Q db- /1 . - s r Tri Ch. .00 i Lc kk,pr J 33 1 • • �� n• ` EXHIBIT C.S.A.H. NO. 24 WETLANDS (CROSBY CREEK) WILLOW DRIVE SITE PLAN PROPOSED C.R. 116 N Cy EXHIBIT C.D.2 ,NDS •3) SITE PL, NE N Q M /L 1 4 "nod I own two Rt SE W4 r� MEDINA RR-IB-1 PROPOSED PROJECT I LAKE RR-lA 6A.113 coo RR -113 Official Zoning Map C R 14 fty of Orono, Aftvvwta so We 4 LRA L R-lA LA 18 LR IC t 1% IC I o- RRIA RHIB F $ fts"$$ W. 0 ... Loa* on car V• 6.3 8.4 A ) ym AL am r. v i i v n i ofir r% 11" O-W 1 -.1 CITY of MEDINA MINN[ SOT 1 �� r[�rr�•r�r,r�rrrr •- i--�wrn�iT'" R i 1 .!ZdO�, • Ps R • - mm*awN + -canal la.rl,i • - rr+o,r r••�ulrnlir�r ri•��n�rr�rr�rr�uarr�u[rnru�n�•rfrr[�rr�. ti _� �• � R r NAMEL AL _ � • r 1' t ' • PROPOSED PROJECT �' = .; • R PSG,. ,� , �_;, loco•• pr .�•� rr�r•M•r+wi•�r•� •rr� COUNCIL MEETING CHANGE ORDER NOV 13 1989 DATE: PLACE: November 1, 1989 Orono, Minnesota CITY OF ORI. FIT 13939 PROJECT: CONTRACTOR: Tr`.nk Highway 12, Sanitary Sever 6 Water Albrecht Excavating, Inc., 1408 W.Co. Rd. Main Improvements C. Roseville, MN 55113 CHANGE ORDER NO.: 1 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: This change order provides f-r extension of .ne project completion date of October 15, 1989. The sanitary sever, water main and lift station work shall be completed by January 1. 1990. The restoration work shall be completed by June 1, 1990. The contractor agrees to waive any easement delay or winter construction damages in consideration of this contract time extension. ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT PREVIOUS CHANGE ORDERS THIS UHANGE ORDER NO. 1 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT Approved by: ity of n Minnesota y vI 1 U� —) BY Dates -407� 0.00 0.00 $106, 348.00 Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO, ROSENE, AMnEFLIK 6 kSSOCIATES, INC. Approved by: recht Excvating, Inc. By —or Distribution 1 - City .rk 2 - Contractor - Lnfineer CITY OF ORONO RLSOLUTION C" THE CITY COUh� NO. RESOLTITI;.1 PRIORITIZING DEFICIENT BRIDGE STRUCTURES WHEREAS, The Minn, )ta Legislature has provided funds for assistance in the rehabilitation or reconstruction of deficient bridges, and WHEREAS, The City of OY Tro 1:as analyzed the bridges needing recori$..ruction on the laity streets, and WHEREAS. It is apparent thr:re is •,iiificient funding available on the local level. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Orono Council does hereby request financial assistance in .•ie reconstruition of the following bridges: Bridat! No. Location Priority Estimated Cost 90653 Old Crystal Bay Rd. 6 1 $610,000 Burlington No. R.R. 90650 Willow Drive i 2 $510,000 Burlington No. R.R. L-8865 -ox 5t 6 Ta:.ager Creek 3 $120,000 L-8854 larndale r.,. i Brown Cr-ek 4 $1r - 000 James R. Grabek, Mayor ATTES" t' V Clerk LR/70 The City should also pass the attached resolutions that prioritize's the bridges on the City system for replacement. If you save any questions please contact this office. Yours very truly, SONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIR i ASSOCIATES, INC. .C-. le L. 04 Glenn R. Cook GRC:dh Page 2 L8/68 A Bones t roo Cato G 9oneuroa PE �t C :,"PE Rosene RKrad&sjro^ `"' PE RKnartf E ironer PF mom Anderiik & J,mn R Cook, PE Glenna Coo►. v[ Thomas E Noye: PE R.tAssociates G kn,". PPE ManM L Sdrvala. PE Mine Engineers & Architects Octo1`pr 23 1989 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, M11 55323 ALtn: John Gerhardson Re: Old Crystal Bay Road Railroad Bridge File No. 13901 Dear John: KeKh A Go don PE RKhAW W FOun PE DonM C &OWICL PE Ieny A ,dX"n. PE Mart A Manwn PE tea K FM OE MKhae1 r Rautmann PE Robert R Peek w PE Datnd O Wskou. PE Thomas W Peterson. PE Mchaer C Lyrrh PE Jamn R MaIX4 PE ",Wfl, PP NWIf Kath A BXtihar'o ►E , r MSK it k ak�v L Rabem C Russel, A I A T}1o(*Mt e A PE f4OMraPd EA0 2 �` SPE e'°�--_ Phdp J CeSMy PE Marx D Waft, PE 1haaWI R AnaNson. AtA GKF .R UWh --9C "1 t+anan M 01s041f The Crystal Bay Road bridge at the Burlington Nort►--:. ".ailroad is scheduled for replacement in 1991. The bridge is eligible for r-.EE::-al funding under the bridge bonding program. The rroject should be initiated at this time as it takes about eighteen months to get a project of this type under construction. The following is a preliminary project schedule: Order Preparation of Plan li Spec November 1989 Submit Project Path Report January 1990 Submit Project Study Report April 1990 Submit Plans 6 Specifications September 1990 Initiate Right of Nay Acquisition April 1990 Receive Bids January 1991 Complete lonstr.iction July 1991 The project financing is dependent on the legislatures support of t::e Bridge Bonding Funding. Those portions of the project colt not supported by the Bridge Bonding Fund can be financed through the MSA Fund. The following is a summary of the preliminary project cost: Estimated Cust Bridge Funds MSA City. bridge Construction $420,000 $420,000 Bridge Approach 100,000 $100,000 Preliminary Eng. 15,000 15,000 Design Eng. 32.000 32,000 Construction Eng. 28,000 28,J00 Administrative 15,000 $15,000 Project Totals $610,OOL $420,000 $175,000 $15,000 Page 1 2335 West Highway 36 0 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 �s City of � RESOLUTION OF NO. A RESOLUTION PRIORITIZING BRIDGE STRUCTURE WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature has provided funds for asistance in the rehabilitation or reconstruction of deficient bridges; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono has analyzed the bridges needing reconstru-tien on the City streets; and WHEREAS, it is apparent there is insufficient funding available :)n t' e local level. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Orono Council does hereby request f;.nancial assistance in the reconstruction of the following bridges: Estimated Bridge No. Location r-riority Cost 97653 Old Crystal Bay Rd & 1 $ 560,000 Burlington No. R.R. 90650 Willow Dr & 2 560,000 Burlington No. R.R. L-8865 Fo:c St & Tanager Creek 3 100,000 L-8854 Ferndale Rd & Brown Creek 4 100,000 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting field the loth day of July, 1989. ATT ST: ':3--,othy M allin, City Clerk Jame R. Grabek, Mayor Cite of ORONO RESOLUTION OF *rHE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION PRIORITIZING DEFICIENT BRIDGE STRUCTURES WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature has provided fun( for asistance in the rehabilitation or reconstruction of deficient bridges; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono has analyzed the bridges needinq reconstruction on the City streets; and WHEREAS, it is apparent there is insufficient funding available on the local level. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Orono Council does hereby request financial assistance in the reconstruction of the following bridges: Estimated Bridge No. Location Priority Cost 90653 Old Crystal Bay Rd & 1 S 560,000 Burlington No. R.R. 90650 Willow Dr & 2 560,000 Burlington No. R.R. L-8865 Fox St & Tanager Creek 3 1_00,000 L-8854 Ferndale Rd & Brown Creek 4 100,000 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held the loth day of July. '-989. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Halli.,, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor 3(;l 7789.1HD To: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator From: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director Date: .duly 7, 1989 Subject: Bridge Bonding - Resolution Recently the City prioritized the order in which bridge replacement should occur. The reason for the prioritizing was to take advantage of funding available to replace deficient bridges throughout the State and, in particular, bridges in Orono. The attached resolution lists the bridges in Orono and the order of priority for replacement and touay's cost for replacement. Part of the process is design engineering costs that the City must pay for but wi?.1 be reimbursed once a bridge is completed. The design engineering costs for the Old Crystal Bay Road Bridge are $30,000.00. Recommendation - To approve Resolution # prioritizing the bridges in Orono and authorizing City staff to apply for funding for replacement of the Old Crystal Bay Bridge. Proposed Notion - Moved by , seconded by to approve Resolution # ___ Drioriti iz ng the bridges in Orono and authori .ing City staff to apply for funding for replacement of Old Crystal Bay Road Bridge. Ayes , nays To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administratt: Forwarded recommending approval. COUNCIL MEETING To: Marie E. Bernhardson, CityAdministrator From: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director NOV 13 1989 Date: October 26, 1989 c' Subject: Bridge Bonding Program - Old Crystal Bay Road jirVV dcf ORONC #90653 In July 1989 the City Council approved Resolution #2662 prioritizing and requesting funding for bridge replacement in the City of Orono. Due to the time involvement, it is necessary to begin the process for replacement of the bridge over the Burlington Northern Railroad on Old Crystal Bay Road (#1 priority). Recommendation - To direct the City Engineer to prepare plans and specifications for replacement of the Old Crystal Bay Road Bridge. Proposed Motion - Moved by , seconded by , to direct the City Engineer to prepare plans and specifications for replacement of the Old Crystal Bay Bridge. Ayes , nay To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members From: Mark C. Bernhardson, City Administratovk Attachment A - Capital Budget Plan 1990-2000 dated 10/89 Forwarded recommending approval. The estimate en,3ineering costs are $30,000. The total project is estimated to be $610,000 including engineering. The State is expected to fu.-d $420,000, $175,000 from the City's MSA with City having to fund $15,C�19 from other sources. It will take approximately two years f. om submission of plans and specifications for the City to receive authorization to undertake the project. All II V/ i ! ; j ,,�fir •I w . �:r .,, i '` +t. ! � .. �j//�1'«'�!r •fw �:w i - �•:.ir `•. �..�t�.tifi. , f'~` � ��!�a rf�. - .. .. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 & 2 AND SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 9, AND GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISIJN 19 FILE #1468 WHEREAS, George and Sally Pillsbury (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 1300 Brackett's Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Exhibit A attached (hereinafter ":he property"); and WHEREAS, the applic,nts have made application to the City of Orono for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 anti Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to construct a greenhouse addition and a retaining wall within the -75' Lakeshore setback zone, resulting in structure and hardcover in the 0-75' zone where no structure or hardcover is normally allowed, and which greenhouse addition encroac-4—s past the defined average lakeshore setback line where no enci_- .:vent is normally allowed, and further requesting a conditional use permit for grading work within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19. NOW, THERL'FORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was revie47nd as Zoning F1'_e #1468. 2. The property is located in the LR-lA Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The property is approximately 2.96 acres in area. 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on October 16 1989 and recommended approval of the proposed variance and-.,nditional use permit on a vote of 5-2, based on the following findings: Page 1 of 6 .. .. .. � .. tip..:.,... . A) The average lakeshore setback encroachment will not impair any existing lake views enjoyed by neighboring property owners. B) :"lie retaining wall and associated grading proposed at �.he top of the lakeshore bank is necessary for preservation of the lakeshore bank, which is currently exhibiting some slumping effect. The 24"-30" proposed height of the single proposed retaining wall is low enough that the wall can be easily screened using existing and additional vegetation coupled with the stone construction 7aterials proposed. C) The proposed hardcover increase from 5.7% up to 7.6% in the 0-75' setback zone * s relatively minor in its impact on the lake given the relatively large 0-75' zone. Further, the effect cf_ the additional hardcover in the 0-75' zone is minimized by the proposed drain - tile which will collect runoff between the residence and the shoreline and transport the runoff to the 75- 250' zone for below grade and overland dispersal. D) The lakeshore setback variance i; justified by the need for southeast exposure for the proposed growing or orchids, this being the only suitable location for such a greenhouse addition because of the existing orientation and location of the house. Further, the elevation of the existing house and proposed greenhcuse addition above the lake and the height of the lakeshore hank will. tend to minimize the visual impact of the gre- rhouse as viewed f rc- the lake. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply ge...rally to other property in this zoning district; thLt granting the variance woulj not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nc.r pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring p:uperties; would not merely serve as a convenience to the ap[,Iicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial F roperty right of the applicants; anO would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Flan of the City. Page 2 of 6 6. The City Council finds thac granting a conditional -.3e permit to allow the proposed grading and retaining walls in the 0-75' zone will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pise a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it deprec ate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of usa of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of she Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Coun,,il hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 and 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit construction of a areenhcuse addition and retaining walls in the 0-75' lakeshore setback ..one, resulting in an increase in hardcover from 5.7% to 7.6% in 'he 0-75' zone where no hardcover is normally allowed, resulting in additional Etruct•ire in the 0- 75' zone where no structure is normally allowed, resulting in an average lakeshore setback encroachment of approximately 1251; and further grants a conditional. use permit for grading and retaining w�'.ls in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall provide the City Engineer with a detailed filial grading and retaining wall plan, which must by approved before permits can be issued for the grading/retaining wail construction. The City Engineer shall work in conjunction with the applicants t- Pstablich suitable limits for the grad' work. 2. The applicants shall mair-ain existing vey-;t_ )n )n the lakeshore bank as proposed, and shall plant addit onal ve;3etation to screen the prop03,A 24"-30" high retaining wall from r' lake to reduce its -isual impact. Applicant shall :use r e materials and natural coloring �to minimize the visual act of this wall to the greatest extent possible. 3. As proposed, applicants s`:.i 1 1 construct a drainti 1 e -4--gym between the e-ristir,g residence and the lakeshore, to c` the dra'.rage from the 0-75' zone to the 75-250' :.c dispersal. Page 2 of 6 4. Hardcover in the 0-75' setback zo: v 3a I not increase above the 1,5t." square feet (7.6%) aT ir.•over3 with this resolution, as indicated on the site plan artached hereto 3s Exhibit B. Applicants are advised that any iuture proposals to increase hardcover in the 0-75' zona wil.1 not be approved, but might be approved only in conjunction with concurrent romovals of equi alent amounts of hardcover in the 0-7.,' zone, resulting in no 0-75' hardcover i:-crease._ 5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Ftoperty not witn t.ie applicants, but ale permissive on] y and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or t; special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (Novtvmber 13, 1990). 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the term; and conditions of this rt :solution shall constitute a v-.ol ation of the zoning code, shall automatically termin,*? -,ny authority granted herein, and shall be pun'shable as a misdemeanor. i. Tne undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree `.o the terms of this esolvtion and on cehal., of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby ag-e i c.- the recording of this, resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council or. this 13th day of November, 1989. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk rr' oper.:y .)wnez- ' a ) -'ward J. Callahan, Jr., Acting Mayor Page 4 of 6 STATE -)F MINNESOTA ss. CGUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was i, knowledged before R;r on this 13th clay of November 1989, by Edward J. Callahan, .;r. & Dorothy M. Hailin, Acting Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and aaid instrument Weis executed on behaIZ of the City. Notary Public My Commissir Expires Page S of " • . .. .- - 1 ... .•s'.. t.♦^..•`t .i ..v.,_i•...!'st�•.x►.Nr..,:..''..W4,N.'--. .Ji+►1't.Yw�t►. .-�r•e r.. STATE OF MIINESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of r 198 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who exacuted the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On th{s day of , 198 , before me a Notary Public vithin and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executel the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 6 of 6 1 , 1 �j7Ot.1 0 JgA�I' o ezfo+ ft9f u-r: cleewr tov ` O 41 Jop JO rN ' 1• f tom•' • f c rl� ate. -Now t A J HAR?'Cr'!ER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-%5� 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' ExiSTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE aF-PR/Pf�PoS=D -------------------------- C�NGL . �-aO � a V�0.-r1►JF�\ A. HOUSE x 254 S.F. LENGTH WIDTH x a S.F. X = S.F. x s S.F. x S.F. B. GARAGE x a S.F. C. DRIVEWAY X = S.F. x S.F. D. SIDEWALK x S.F. x _ S.F. x a S.F. E. EATIO/ ECK x a S.F. F.LANDsr-Apc x _ a `'S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN BY X S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING! s-To-V - x = S.F. x S.F. G. OTHER x _ S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE - 19 6S S.F. TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE - ZS��25 S.F. x 100 - � . !� p P'u.:,e�av r'�S:CIt�14 V'1FL^NC$ ' ppu c-CM 0►,j HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) O-7S' 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE BET-0 ^16 A. HOUSE x S,F, LENGTH WIDTH x _ = S.F. a x = S.F. x S.F. x _ - i rT' S.F. B. GARAGE x = S.F. C. DRIVEWAY _ x S.F. x = S.F. D. SIDEWALK x = S.F. x = S.F. E. PATIO/ x = S.F. DECK x S.F. r.LANDSCAPE x = S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN BY x S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING x = S.F. x = S.F. G. OTHER x S.F. -------------- TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE - 14 S. F. L' ' TOTAL PROPERT,f AREA IN ZONE - 2Sg2S _ S.F. _ =�B x 100 0 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' %5-?50' 250-500' 500-1(".'-"' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE 'gnp./m'tOpomo -------------------------- (ww.Roec oVr.94Ave) A. HOUSE x = 44 S.F. LENGTH WIDTH x = S.F. x S.F. x = S.F. X = S. F. B. GARAGE X $ S.F. C. DRIVEWAY X • S.F. x - S.F. D. SIDEWALK X = S.F. x = S.F. E. SATIO/ ECK x X = S.F. F.LANDSCAPE X = S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN BY X S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING X • S.F. X = S.F. G. OTHER X S.R. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE - ( 494' S. F . Q TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE - S. ED- _ B x 100 - HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET VgFugnrc� `'PvucalnarV SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' %5-?50' 250-500' 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. HOUSE X = S.F. LENGTH WIDTH X S.F. x = S.F. x S.F. x = S.F. B. GARAGE x = S.F. C. DRIVEWAY X = S.F. x= _ S.F. D. SIDEWALK X a S.F. X • -- S.F. x l.f. E. ATIO: �ECK X s S.F. F.LANDSCAPE _ x — S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN = S.F. BY x PLASTIC SHEETING x a — S.F. X = -- .— S.F. G. OTHER X a S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE - 450 _ S.F. �--� q -�- I OTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE - `' a r S.F. x iC0 a HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' ExiSTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE -------------------------- A. HOUSE X S.F. LENGTH WIDTH X _ S.F. i X S.F. X a S.F. X S.F. B. GARAGE _ X _ S.F. C. DRIVEWAY X 3 S.F. S.F. 0. SIDEWALK X - S.F. x a _ S.F. X 3 S.F. E. EATIO/ ECK X s S.F. F.LANDSCAPE X _ S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN BY X = S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING X S.F. X a S.F. G. OTHER X S.F. TOTAL. HARDCOVER IN ZONE - S.F. ` - ' TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE - S.F. HARDCOVER ICULATION KRKSHEET VAa�NCIE AwucemaN SETBACK ZONE' (CIRCLE ONE) 75-250' 25� 0-500'Y 500-1000' ExISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE eF=a04-1 -d'40 A---Ma(NO -------------------------- A. HOUSE x _ _ _ S.F. LENGTH WIDTH _ x = S.F. x a S.F. x S.F. x = S. F, B. GARAGE x = S.F. C. DPIVEWAY x _ = S.F. x = S•F. 0. SIDEWALK X = S.F. x - __ S.F. xa _ S.F. E. gAT I O/ UDECK x a S.F. P.LANDSCAPE x S•=. AREAS UNDERLAIN s S.F. BY x PLASTIC SHEETING x s S.F. x - S.F. G. OTHER x a S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE - 2� S.F. TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE S.F. 5B B x RUN DATE 09/21/89 BATCH 302 38 11--117-23 32 0009 PROP ADDR 01400 BRACKETTS POINT RD OWNER NAVE ELEANOR LAWLEP PILLSBURY TAXPAYER JOHN S PILLSBURY NAME/ADDR 1300 TCF TOWER MPLS MN 55402 38 11-117-23 32 0017 PROP ADDR 01300 BRACKETTS POINT RD jWK R NAME GEORGE S PILLSBURY ET AL 1AXPAYER GEORCE S PILLSBURY �- NAHE/ADDR 1300 TCF TOWER MPLS HN 55402 38 11-117-23 33 0001 �PkOP ADDR 01420 BRACKETTS POINT RD OWNER NAME ELEA►IOR LAWLER PILLSBURY TAXPAYER JOIN S PILLSBURY NAIIE/ADDR 1300 TCF TOWER MPLS MN 55402 HENNEPIN COUftTY PROPERTY INFORMATION S':STEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST V 38 11-117-23 32 0010 01265 BP'-KETTS POINT Kq MICHAEL E N III A WIFE HICHAEL A IJA IYNN III 1465 BRAG.+, S POINT WA1'ZATA 55391 ✓ 38 11-3 7-23 32 0018 01220 6RACKETTS POINT RD ELLA P CROSBY ELLA P CRISBY 1220 BRACKETTS POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55A91 TOTAL BATCH 002 00007 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 3 38 11-117-23 32 0011 01420 BRACKETTS POI11T RD ♦/ ELEAIKIR L PILL',BURY FILMURY 1300 TCF TOWER I1PLS lift 55402 38 11-117-23 32 0019 JOII14 S PILLSBURY JR ET AL JOII14 S PILLSBLRY JR 1300 TCF TOWER MPLS 1111 55402 L CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEIRIEPIN COUNTY DEPPAARRRTMENNTT, OF PkOPEK T TION. TO THE BEST EF OF 11Y KNONLEDGE AND BELI DAT£�1 �(/ � F�- I MS&R ,nne Mabus _h 2. September 1989 Page _- The landscaping plan calls for planting the bank edge to reduce soil erosion and promote the absorption of rain water runoff. Perforated drain tile around the addition will conduct runoff to a wet well with a perforated co•-er. It is awkward to have to seek a variance in any circumstance but particularly when a cede, such as Orono's setback requirement, 1-as be-n enacted both to ,reserve natural resources as well as Lo protect community interests. However, the Pillsbury's proposed addition, because of its nature (being in effect a greenhouse) and size (210 SF) would have minimal environmental and visual impact. A denial of ':heir application would cause them sufficient hardship in the use of their land that we ask that you recommend a granting of their variance request. You s sincerely. Thomas Meyer 8830/LO92889 doc MS&R Architect, ,Nlever, Scherer & Rockca+dp, Ltd. ;st Second avenue North Minneapolis, Sirnncsora 55401 612 3'5-oi36 28 September 1989 Jeanne Mabusth City of Orono Building and Zoning Administration 1335 South Brown Road Orono, Minnesota 55391 Re: Pillsbury Residence - #8830 Dear Jeanne and Membe4 of tha Planning Commissi-in: This letter is written ' support of George ar..l Sally Pillsbury's request for .i conditional use permit and variance to add on a plant room to the south side of *heir existing house. The original house, built in 1949, is itself in violation of the 75' setback and therefore also the zero percent allowable hardcover percentage area within 75 feet •Df the 929.4 foot defined lake elevation shoreline; certain portions of it lie within about 55 feet of shoreline. Although we acknowledge that additions cannot be yrandfathered in under pry• -existing conditio4is, the location of the existing structure severely limits buildi.ng options. The plant room addition has to be on the south side of the house to get the aright indirect light necessary for their collection c` orchids and other plants. Furthermore, it is highly undesirable to have to direct guests, who wish to see Sally's flower collection, through private areas of the existing master bedroom. The only neighbor within direct view of the greent:uus(_ would be Eleanor Pillsbury, whose closest living area would be 280 feet from the proposed addition. Few users of the lake would be much aware of the addition, because the 25 foot embankment would obscure close-u- views and because the proposed addition has so much glass as I)e largely trans;jrent from a distance. The structure which looks somewhat like an arbor will be painted white fi blend in with the existing house and with the mature white birch trees among which it is to be located. GEOROE S. PILLSBUBY 3300 TCF TOWER MIYNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55402-287 October 2, 1989 Ms Jeanne A Masbusth Zoning Administrator City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn 55323 Dear Ms Masbusth: Unfortunately, neither Sally nor I can attend your next meeting (we made a commitment last May to be out of the country). However both Herb Baldwin and Tom Meyer will be representing us to explain our request and answer any questions. We hope that you feel as we do that our addition of a small conservatory improves the overall appearance of our house just as the porch did that we added off the living room and bedroom several years after we purchased the house in 1953. We believe that the addition does comply with both the intent and spirit of the set back ordinance and hope that you will approve our request for a conditional use permit and variance. Sincerely, GSP rpd PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property LP-1 A p-6S�DErJ rt �. Resident ; it _ Other (specifvj •--------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: 6P GKJNOUSE ADOMOW 7t <rJ EXIS-nN6 HOME $UNIT 1W 114-91 VWTN MISGFU-ANEOUS LANQS 01PJr , .IS +►J6 4-iCXJZF 1'1ND pPopoSBQ GP£gNHousE (_ANOScApiwQ ALA_ Oq w-r"LLY W I'Tl4l),j 11�-0 : cri$X K OF LAW. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS VARi9NGc So��6t;1' 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 6. Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). i. Plat Map. 8. As an addendum to ",is application, please attach a separate list of any ocher persons ;... wish notified of this application. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not c mplete if the above information has not been included. --------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature --------------------------- Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information re,;:.ired or requested by the Zoning AJministrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature / Date �;422_ OWNERS SIGNATURE I The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the propert., by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purvoses of investigation and ve 'ficat o of this request. Owner's signature / Date Applicant must hav a'' ubmittals into a City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission M<<y_,inq. Planning ission Meetings are held on the tnird Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable t- attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements tc have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building rt Zoning Office of -his change prior to the meeting. CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION --------------------------------- -- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 13Cn BRAcKET-.I,' PC'NFr PLO' oar Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) I I I I � 23320�1� CI T y ;)F ORDyo Please check one - Property i< abstract or torrens? FINAYCE CUICE (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not includ4-P,, �CpiT-T�w,"k. L'rrl on required survey. �,yawq�--K r of oRQNo po,K4r L.crr 4 tINkIQ C1101 k;;1 7 --------------------------------------------------------------------------4R�r' r,PPLICANT Phone (home) 37 4 - 1-146 Name Tj- 'M �' MEYEP. Phone (work) 3')5-033�0 MEY6R cHupER & i�-OckcA.'z f;� Sri rr,' EQ Address 3QS SL 3NO AVENUE NORTt4 City M NN69pau zip SS401 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) 413-967A Name 6E0PZE P!u-S eurZ11 Phone 336- 39-14 Address 12 _)o $PACxE`T-"; F101N7- 9-6aO City Op-orjb - _ zip SS'39 I Date ProlatFt cquired APFLiL 1953 (month/year) I (do) 7-do-n6t)l also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After -the -Fact Fee - Double Current Applica�ion Fee $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 f) Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more f Grading seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore HAeDCCV -V i C1&44!X VAe �vC-tom, PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $150.00 Easement Vacation $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $250.00 Rezoning $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule compensate for the proposed addition. There is an existing stairway for lakeshore access, and there are two terraced areas with randomly spaced flagstones located in the 0-75' zone. Note that on an overall basis, hardcover on the property is substantially less than the allowed maximums, except for the small perc�-,:,tage in the 0-75' zone. Staff Recoa endation - Staff would recommend approval of the variance for average setback, based on the finding that no lake views currently enjoyed by neighboring properties will be reduced. Staff would recommend approval of the conditional use permit for regrading in the 0-75' zone including installation of a r1ral,, tile/wet well system to transfer runoff from the 0-75' zone to the 75-250' zone, subject to final detail plan approval by the City Engineer. Regarding the lakeshore setback variance, Planning Commission in the past has adhered fairly consistently to the position that no new additions should extend closer to the shoreline than the existing house. The proposed greenhouse would extend approximately 2' closer to th, lake than, the existing house, but this occurring only at t.,e very corner of the greenhouse. Planning Commission could base approval of the lakeshore setback variance on the location of the existing house and the fact that the bulk of the proposed addition, except for one corner, is no closer to the lake than the existing house. Regarding hardcover, Planning Commisison might consider finding that the proposed drainage system transferring runoff from the 0-75' zone to the 75-250' zone for dispersement, is a suitable mitigation of the additional 1.9% hardcover in the 0-75' zone. Alternatively, it would be consistent wi:.h past Planning Commission policy to require removals of existing hardcover in the 0-75' zone, resulting in no net percentage increase. The fact that the majority of drainage from the house already drains or can be directed to drain away from the eastern shoreline, makes this property unique in that respect, and may be an additional finding to support a recommendation for approval. EXISTING ALLOWED PROPOSED S.F. (8) S.F. (%) S.F. %) HARDCOVER 0-75' 1,491 (5.7%) 0 (0%) 1,965 (7.68) 75-250' 11,450 (18.2%) 15,725 (25%) 11,494 (18.3%) 250-500' 2,500 (6.3%) 12,000 (30%) No Change 3. In conjunction with the greenhouse development, applicants are proposing some minor regrading and a 30" stone retaining wall at the top of the steep lakeshore bank. This work is intended to redirect drainage away from the ridge of the slope in order to preserve that slope. A draintile is proposed to collect runoff between the house and the steep bank in the 0-75' zone, and transport that runoff to a wet well in the 75-250' zone where it will be dispersed below grade, iith an overflow to grade in the 75- 250' zone. This drainage concept has been briefly reviewed with the City Engineer and he has requested some additional detail but feels the proposal generally should be acceptable. 4. Applicant was also asked to provide some elevation views and cross sections to help in visualizing the degree of impact the 55' setback will have from the lake. Due to the topography and low profile of the greenhouse, that visual impact may be minimal. Applicant was also made aware of the City's concern regarding 0-75' building additions that encroach closer to the shoreline than the existing house. 5. Technically, an average lakeshore setback variance is required. However, the most affected neighboring residence is more than 200' away and this greenhouse will have no impact on lake views enjoyed by that property. Discussion - This is an approximately 3 acre parcel, and the majority of runoff from the house and driveway areas already flows generally away from the eastern shoreline. The proposed tile/wet well surface drainage system would appear to compensate for not only the proposed additional hardcover, but may help to decrease the impact of existing runoff flows. The applicants have stated that the grading work directly east of the existing house and proposed greenhouse is to help redirect drainage and provide additional support for the steep slope area. some slumping apparently is already occurring, as can be witnessed by a dip in the hedge line at the ridge. The applicant's stated intent is to p' erve the existing vegetation on the steep slope. Planning lisEion may wish to address the potential for screening ' etaini:ig wills to minimize its visual impact from the lake. The applicants have noted that other than the existing house and existing embankment walls in the 0-75' zone, there is very little additional hardcover which could con--eivably ze removed to If e SET - BACKS System must be: - - -- - --E - - - a'st;•y grade i back fill 6"Min. 3'to4'' layer a' umcrrpocted r-ey or s!r^rr covered with O i 4�p'x �° red res:n ,oiler _!� T , T4 1z rock fd7er ma!er:aS rake s:dewc"s a bottom to �F� E-« nVE c 'm Q ems` -rat' I Ctr \a." 4 t�EPLak•CUV) rernove smecnng �:laCO mPAt�1aP �.CA rYf`{ SRFrD� 1P r}m4-ig•£YL1e}� TRENCH X— SECTION (mn• of two irtn0es) (mcr. a. ;':� 100) SOIL BORING ELEVATIONS TH'I EL.-349 , TH .'2 EL. 32Z TH 73 EL: 523 TH. 4 EL -- TH75 EL E! EVAMN at PRCPOSEO RNRNG CH :'EER-S.1.n.Q (grourd 6ev.) U,,er`tAv r-r aYc>-Cr�1•�t� �+-t.`7 SYSTEM DESIGN_ TYPE_�sj BFGROOM - Perco'o'-cn rateyl minAtch (des*,gn_<.._,!r min./inch) w/C*CP ILD"i- . ir.-30 Q I C1NTK `-1s M•n 1. r. Titotrr•eN area requ per' w/ of rock filter rnater:old• 10°/, =r r sq.ft of french bottom area seeded trench w dth =_ in. fl. of !renc`r needed , numter of drop taxes ry-lo w.. n/rn %CO QCVC - (to bee deferm.ned by ;he instc•'er). Number of tat.ks reriiired a, Isl tonk�gat., and tcr,k�go. rr�n�rrums�a.y¢»ry�}._c,>aarh��-� Tank ;A' from prcpetty line- tram V s from b:dgs. Treo'rrenh area = 'from Ckes , =streams Treo'rrert creo :a ' from property fines HA► !;a ES r1 -x V' f .4 ' from we!'s =Q'from bags r , 1Q' from tree_s�at: Paver sLppy and switches must be in a weather r �n proof endosl:re ou}sde pLrm'ng chamber min. Tonk ' Tanks _; ' _; Grade S %s'cpe CrQEto Tank F .0w Lwa 1 At !east 41/2' of und's'vt;ed Min' I to f3 , �Pu�rg earth ttMEEn trenches i %lax-1 tc4' fx��f��s,-fA1r 14 Mrs a� T_ v+Pc� ikr'..Co q` Chem��r DROP BOXES 4•to6'd;o Ope av _tE �otA� trtfta_ r:� - - — C'ear+ row? cu. yds (3/4 " to L I/2" o o. , includes 2 "obcve pipe) PROPERTY OF t-k NOF•vv1A 1J Ito .sra.cT t.. S?� � Purr•p:rq c'scmter ccpocity= 25% of doily srwege flow of[oQgd. aSal.tReserve.s'yo Qo!+ Pipe b ckdro'noge9-qe!: �gal.cop. 1�"V � t-�- �. F�cE4tcE- Itol.1 �- rr•�•yn=• • ..: ( Reserve storage : 'P,syu1. / bed:oo n=(e=9al. t p pe back dN+te,e-&c..Tgd / 1005n.f1. 122 pipe- !eng'h of pipe needed Opp VC fIL ="I,I Pump site -9-a—hp w/mercury float pump controls usEo I Lr t4r t?o tmyr-s.t max. 3;h5.� us � ; S-P//TEST/NG INC. l Nate When coretructing bed - , this urea should be shaped Note- Distance from trea` &tf area to neighboring wells— ' Oesigred By: 7t •^ �+ 7�n..-~ to .•vert run-off frc•n entering treatment area. L2rsEn CIM Oote �-r}/a4/a"1r- , PH. 6r2- 497- 3566 L-13 CERTI:'ICATION # O^527 Locs of Soil Borincs Location or Protect Lan Hoffman, Lot 2, Block 2, Foxhill, Orono Borings made by S-P Test,nc, Inc. Steve Schirmers Date 4-14-A9 Classifiction' System: AASHU USDA-SCS X Unified ; Other Aucer used !check two!: Hand X_ , or Power , Flicht , or Bucket X Depth, Borinc number 1 IDepth, I Boring number 2 in feet Surface eleva*io:i_ 96.0 0 - 2 3 - 4 - 5 - 7 - 8 - Topsoil dark brown loam 0 - 6" Brown loamy sand to medium sand 6" - 2'4" Brown loamy sand 214" - 2110" Brown medium sand 2'10" - 4'2" Brown loamy sand 412" - 5'-mottled Olive brown sandy loam 5' - 6-1/2' HIT ROCK End of boring at 6-1121 feet. Standing water table: present at feet of depth, hours after boring. Not present in hole X Mottled soil: Observed at 5, feet of depth. Not present in hole Comments: iZ I feet Surface elevation 97.3 0 - Topsoil dark brown 0 - 8" sandy loam I - i Brown sandy loam 2 i 8" - 2-1/2' Brown loam 3 - ' 2-1/2' - 3' i 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - Brown medium sand 8 - 3' - 8' End of boring a. 8 feet. Standing water table: present at feet of depth, hours after boring. Not present in hole X . Mottled soil: Observed at feet of depth. Not present in hole X ConTents: J �r CERTIFICATION # 00627 Locs of Soil Borings . •.0ocation or Pz:o:ect Dan Hoffman. ?.ot2,Blk.2, Foxhi_'_. Orono Borings mace by S-D Testing. inc. Steve Schir-ers Date 4-14-89 Classifiction System: AASH.j USDA-SCS X !:n_f_ed Other Auger used (check two!. Hand X or Power Flight , or Bucket X Depth, in feet 1610 - 2 - 4 - 5 - G� 7 - Boring number 3 Surface elevation 97.3 I Fill - dark brown loam 0 - 8" Original soil brown. loamy 8" - 114" sand Brown medium sand w/traces of loamy fine 1'4" - 2-1/2' sand Brown medium sand 1 I I2-1/2' - 4'8" 5'4"-mottled roil weak I Brown sandy loam 4'8" - 6' End of boring at 6' feet. Standing water table: present at feet of depth, hours -after boring. Not present in hole X Depth, feet i I 2 - � I 3 - + 1 + t' 4 - 5 - 1 i 6 7 - 8 Boring number Surface elevation End of boring at feet. Standing water table: present at feet of depth, !:ours after boring. Not present in hole Mottled soil: mottled so- 4-1-Observed at 5'4" feet of 'depth. Observed at feet of depth. Not present in hole Not present in hole Comments: Comments: CI TAB CC27 PERCOLATION' TEST DATA SHEET r— Perco:ationtestrcadingsmcdr5v S—P Testing. inc. o"4-15-89 fling at 2 42 p.hr. Test hole locution Lot 2 , B 1 k . 2 . Foxh i 11, Oro Nole number 1 , Date hose was prepare(+ 4-14 — 9 Depth of ho!e bottom 24 inches, Diameter of We 6 inches Soil data from test We: Depth. inches Suit texture 0 — 6" Topsoil dark brown !cam 6" - 24" Brown loamy'sand to medium sand %icthod of scratching sidewa,'! Knif e Depth of grrvel ir. x,tto^t o" ho:r 2 .nches 4-14-89 D • �OD1n. '_ Datc and hour of initial water fillim- ep! o. initial wa�rr �::ing i^.rhrs above hose butwin Method used to maintain at !cast ! 2 inches of water depth in hole for at !east 4 hours Automatic siphon y Maximum water depth above hole btrtotn during test 6 inches Time Time 4 inter•a% minutes Mcaturement, inches ' Drop in water :evil, inches Pc►co!ation rite, ' Remarks minutes per inch 2:30 pref111 6 , 2:42 2:57 5 3.0 ; 15 min 3:02 3:17 4-7/8 3.1 " of 3:19 3:33 to4-3/4 3.2 ! IN I 1 i i 3' 1 Petrulation rate = ^.iWes per inch. . CERT.000627 PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHyET r� S—P Testing, Inc. 4-15-89 2:43 a— Perco!ation tea rm-ein�s made by ur %tan:ng a• Trst hole locatio�'ot 2 , B 1 k . 2 , F oxhi l l , Orono{ole number 2 , Date We was prepares 4-14 — 8 9 Depth or hose bottom 24 inches, Diameter of hole 6 ;riches Soil ew.a from :e,;! Io:e: D-pth,inches 0 — 8" 8" — 24" MethmKiofKnife Suit tevum Topsoil dark brown sandy loam Brown sandy loam Drp:huCa;s>E: �Uc:rno''tu:c 2 inches 4-14-89 5:00am 12 Date and hour v.:n:!;a! water I:i:-ig , Depth U snit:al water !i!'i 'nches above ho!c bottUnl `irt!nx! used :o maintain u: }east.:: i^ches of water depth in hose for at least 4 hours Automatic siRhon Maximum water depth above ho!e bottom during tes! 6 �ncltes Time in:cna:, miru:es Vleaauremcnt. inches Drop in water !eve!, inches Percolation rate. Remarks minutes per inch 2:30 prefill 6 2:43 2:58 3-1/4 4.6 15 min 3:01 3:16 3 5.0 " 3:19 3:34 i 2-7/8 •5.2 " i I � I i I � I i I I � hrco:ation tale - 4.9 nnwes per inch. CERT.' 00627 PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET a.m. percolation test reading: made by S—P Testing, Inc. or 4-15— 9 9 stan;ny' a, 2 4d Lot2,31k.2,Foxhill, Orono 3 4-14-89 Test hole !ocation ole number Da:c ho'.e was prepared -- Depth of hole bo!torn 2 A inche,, Diameter of ho!e6 inches Suil data from test !tole: Depth, inches Soil texture 0 - 8" Fill - dark brown loam 8" - 16" Brown loamy rind rown mediLM sari w __aces of 9od:r.y'fil"Re sand Method of scratching sidewal' Knife Depth of gravel :n bottom of ho!r 2 :riches pp 12 Date and hour of inaial water !'t!!:n,g 4-14— epth npin ti:.: w ter ail-irg anches above ho!e bottom Method used to maintain at !east l: inches of water depth in ho'e for at !east C hour+ Automatic siphon Maximum water step_'+ above We bottom during !es• 6 inches Time ! I Time interval, minutes i Measure -tent. ` inches i Drop in water , level, inches Percolation rate. Remarks minutes per inch 2:30 prefill ; 6 2:44 i 2:59 3-1/2 1 4.3 15 min 3:00 3:20 3:15 3:35 3-7/16 .4.4 " I I i I I 1 , 1 I � i • � r Percolation rasa � 4.4 �± nutes per inch. Jt loll •�;:5 ,� .�• �--------..1---- MOUND FILL 4 - 6 TO ALI.OW FOR COVER . TO 34" 71:' SOIL 100, ,: / •- �!I� �.;'' • /' COVER ABOVE RUCK - �J.�,•J/,;':;:f;� z s,�'• I----------�'�-----,��---3/4" TO 2 I/2" OIA. �l.-.i;. CLEAN ROCK � _l• GG lip / !!� .•1 'r•! .a / ^ I/ � J�. '� is • '4'- JY!'f.�•. n•I.T-; �♦ / f RN;.: r� " �+,` -- `%� - ---- - -- - 4 - 6 LAYER OF UNCOMPACTEO j IIAY OR STRAW COVERED WITH ��•!:a�'I sOEp!0� ,; '� ,y? frf. ;?:�' /i' RFD I'OSIN PAPER'or c;c•IAextile Fabric �'1i��E�it- .�y ~ �' '`j ,�'',•. --- - �_-_ .. _ _ ._--- -TRENCH 130TTOM MUST BE LEVEL y ►R \�\I �/ THROUGHOUT LENG'm .AERt�..: \ ---- - -/� - - -- - 2" MINIMUM ROCK COVER ABOVE PIPE - -/`�•- - -- �� - (i MINIMUM I OCK DEPTH BULOW PIPE // Jar t p51 — --- - �� - --- -.+fir -- --- -- -- 4" DIA. RIGID PERFORA 11= 0 PLASTIC PIPE WITI 1 ONE fEE1 / Rio IOW OF HOLES (:S AL[3 ONG O�1 1 OM 100 WATER TA131 E OR IMPERVIOUS LAYER SUCII AS CLAYPAN. N\ /�/ /, ROCK. 1_ TC. 1 RENCH ROCK COVI-RI'1) WITH fCIiW.I"p.13I_F SYNl IM IC I AHRIC OR 4" I_AYI R OF 1.4ARSH IIAY OIZ _ 4"DIAMETER INSPECTION -PIPE TO NEXT STRAWCOVEMA) WITH UNIRLATID t3UIl_DING INLET DROP 13OX PAPER (14b RUIN) - WI-1_1- WITH CAP EARTH BACKFII-L AT I -FAST ( 1 6" AE3ovr_ TOP OF ROCK --� '' Di51 IZILsU i^ION PIVE _ i )' AT LEAST 6" OI:PTH OF CLEAN ROCK 3/4" TO 21/2' DIA. 51-E 140I F 5. DROP DOX 1l _-- --- .t_�tls ° i-� -- ----MAXIMUM LENGTH = 100 FI_E,T OVERFILL 4 TO 6 INCHES 13ACKFILI_ 0 4t O 6' C. ROCK -- 18" TO 36" NOTES: I. BOTTOM OF TRENCH MUST DE LEVEL. TOP OF TRf•_NC14 ROCK MUST BE i.EVFI_. INSPECTION WELL ?.. SLOPE ON DIS I RIDUTION PIPE SS BETWEEN ►� �� I_LVFL AND 4 INCHES PER 100 1 f.ET. 1 RI"COMM,1=hJl)LO SLOPE IS II:VLI_. 6" T TO 12" OE" SOIL PACKFIII_ 3. DISTRIBUTION PIPE CAN 13E PFRFORATFD �i- PI.ASTIC INSFAII I"D WITH ONE ROW OF I ICI US AI.GNG THE PIPE 001 �1OM. PIPE 2° NVY' r HAVE A 13FARING S I RING TH Of- (-1)E:f'rH Or -ROCK ABOVE At I FA5 r i600 I_B /1- T. I I'II'1. AT LEAS r E:" O1= 4. SCARIFY - �RO(K 131-I OW AS HIGH - P11'F. SUE_ 1 RI:NCH NOIE 5. REMOVE r TI:I.NC; I GUI ,r01A AND �IDFW,'\I.LS AS ROCK WILL 13E PLACED IN THE IN r12D1_R 10 I:XI'OSF NATURAL SOIL. I-00 I: SOIL lil-1-OI:E PLACING ROCK. 5 '•4'I 11:RF 1 RI US ARF PRI-51-N r OR I_IKFIY TO HE F•Izl- SENT DURING ME 1-11-1: OF ME SYSILMo 12 INCIII_S OF ROCK MUST 13E PLACED UNDER THE DIST131BIJTION PIPF-. TRENCH CONSTRUCTION DETAILS INLET FROM SEPTIC TANK OR PREVIOUS DROP BOX --y NOTES OUTLET TO I. ALL ",HOULD BE AT LEAST 4-INCH TRENCH DlAf',.I_-I ER. P EI.(:VATION OF INI F•.T AND SLIF!", * _IN(: TO NEXT DROP t3GX MAY BE ADJIJ`: . ;)P OR -SUPPLY LINF OWN I"OR D(_51RED EFFLUENT L-VEL IN TO NEXT TO BOX 3. ,uGGEST(_D TRENCH LiQUID 1_CVCI_ IS AT —�-- TOP OF I-RENCH ROCK IF PEI!MrkBLE SYNTHETIC FABRIC COVERS ROCK; AT TOP OF OUTLET PIPE IF HAY OR STRAW o COVERS ROCK. 4. I14VI71il- OF 114i.I:T MUST BE AT LEAS I ONE INCI4 HIGHER THAN INVERT OF SUPPLY PIPE TO NEXT DROP BOX. TRrNCI iFS MAY OUTI ET ONE SIDE OR BOTH SIDES 01= DRROP BOX. 1 SUPPLY I - INLET I � ,--- 1 1 _ LINE I �� —SUPPLY LINE OUTI_I_T TO TRENCH 5. . _I—i ; 1 ----a, IIff ^�I — I— -- --- OUTLFTS 1 1 TO TRENCH DROP BOX >E1 I I OUTLET TO TRENCH Y 1� Go LINER SYSTEM FOR PROI-i—E:M SOILS MOUND BACKFII.L 4 TO 6 INCHES FOR SETTLEMENT 4 INCHES OF HAY OR STRAW AND A ' LAYER OF RED ROSIN PAPER `� ��` • •• • is 4 INCH 4;.- �.: a •,L DISTRIBUTION PIPE --- CLEAN ROC:. 3/4 TO 2 '/2 IN) - - I2' INCHF5 w 3 F E--l. T TO GROUND WAl I R OFi OTHC R BARRIER l A'ef I? II i FILL SOIL NOTE: FILL SOIL SHOULD BE I.OAMY SAND WHEN ORIGINAL SOIL IS -)AND. F if-l- SHOULD BE SAND VJIIF-N ORIGINAL SGIL IS CLAY. ' - ' WATER 'TIGHT 13 LOCKABLE El I=CTRIC BOX - PLUGS OR ELECTRIC CONNECTIONS ---- — 2" PVC CGNDUI_r SCHEDULE 60 -- -f L ' MANHOLE COVER CHAINED 81 l_OCKF=D G"SPACE_" SEALED MANHOLE RINGS UNION SEALED TANK COVER PLASTIC ROPE OR CHAIN WI TN ANCliOR ---- - ALARM FLOAT ON SEPARATE ` EL - - ECTRICAI_ CIRCUIT i _ �I 3 J Nil SI-.iUT - Cr!F. _LEVER V _ -- PUMP CONTROL FLOAT IRI-D%'►'OOD, CFDAQ OR TI*_'ATF.D POST (4 x 4 min) Al I- 1:11-Cl RIC CONNECTIONS INSIUL- BOX -LOOP O POYJCR CORD FCR SH T TI_F MENT j_FINAI_ GRADE. RAD. BELOW GRADE MADE --WIRE FROM POWI=R SUPPLY - PIPE IS I -AID ON A UNIFORM SLOPE FROM PUMF) STATION U13 TO SOIL TREATMENT AI3EA FOR FROPER DRAINBACK -- IF PIPE AT TANK MUST BE LOWER THAN UNION TO G1= I' ELEVATION FOR DRAINBACK, A IA INCH WI::hP HOLE MUST BE USED -- WEEP Ii01 E NOTI S: FI_ECtRICAL_ WIRE FROM POWER SUPPLY MUST NOT RUN OVER ANY TANKS BUT MUST HE LAID BESIDE OTHER "TANKS AND MIJS r PLACED IN CONDUIT AI.ONG PO ELECTRICAL CURDS FROM PUMP AND F I -OAI-S MUST BE RUN THROUGH CONDUIT. WIRLS CANNOT HAVE GROUND CON I'A(: METAL COVER CONCRETE -I MANHOLE RING -- iL= METHODS OF SECURING MANHCI_E COVER TO PREVENT t UNAUTHORIZED EN I'RY •, .. PENCIL _ MARKS 20 MANHOLE INLET;~_ SCUM OUTLET i , a '�`.�� Ski- ^ ;__, � ,- ; 's - , •�a!,�`Yi ' � '= • '!'OUTLET LEVF� •-. •.fir._ � • •.; ::. � • . i; r �-- PACE P SCUM CLEAR SA - - -- •- - -- -; �� r CLEAN OUT TANK WHEN: IS 3" OR LESS OR - ---- -==---- - - y "13" IS 12" OR LESS • BLACK COLOR V ' • SLUDGE_ - D15"tINGUISHES SLUDGE `•,1 .j _ _ • ... _ < LAYER FROM LIQUID ' ' { .a,, •'•+�5,-'+rk.i3i..s_ t.. _�,�v.�iRi3i:!: •, i� MEASURE SCUM AND SLUDGE ACCUMULATIONS IN THE SEPTIC TANK ii Fxt-G MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 19, 1989 ZONING FILE /1412-PETERSEN CONTINUED discuss this issue. Zoning Administrator Mabusth reminded the applicant of her opportunity to purchase adjacent land now owned by the City. She noted however, that there would be a delay in final approval of the subdivision it tc.-� applicant chose to obtain the additional land. Mary Petersei said that she preferred to proceed with the subdivision as proposed and obtain the adjacent land at a later time. Planning Commissioner Johnson said that his only concern regarding the subdivision was accessing Lot 3. He agreed with the City Engineer's recommendation to realign Outlot A to entrance McCulley Road at a right angle. Planning Commissioner Hanson questioned whether the applicant understood the City's reasons for what the City Engineer is recommending for Lot 3. Hanson further said that with the exception of providing access to Lot 3, he had no other objections to the subdivision proposal. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. i1413 DANIEL ROFFMAN 1135 a 1155 HERITAGE LANE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION CLASS III AND VACATION OF UTILITY BASEMENT PUBLIC HEARING 8:30 P.M. - 8:31 P.M. The applicant was present for this matter. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Planning Commissioner Hanson, to recommend approval of this application per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes=5, Mays=0, Motion passed. 91420 EEVIN RAY NORWOOD 1360 VINE PLACE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION CLASS IX PUBLIC HEARING 8:32 P.M. - 8:36 P.M. Mr. Earl Norwood was present for this application. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. Norwood said that he preferred to have this matter tabled until such time that his son could be present. 5 COUNCIL INEETING NOV 13 1984 CITY OF ORONO To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson Iron: Michael P. Gaff ron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: November 8, 1989 Subject: 11442 The Landschute Group Inc, 3300 Bayside Road/375 Leaf St - Final Plat Approval - Resolution List of R hibits Exhibit A - Proposed Resolution Exhibit B - Copy of Plat Drawing Exhibit C - Submitted Conceptual Screening Diagram Exhibit D - Preliminary Resolution Discussion The applicants have completed the requirements for final plat approval. Additionally, a conceptual vegetation screening plan has been submitted in respect for concerns of the neighbor to the west about headlights from cars heading down the hill shining into the house. Applicant notes that the proposal is to supplement existing screening by transplanting a few cedar trees from the proposed driveway area. licant notes that the screening can be further augmented once L!,e dr'_eeway is in and final grades and elevations are established. The applicant notes that the intent would be to not disrupt the existing stand of Norway pines noted on the sketch. This had been a concern of the neighbor to the southeast. Staff Recosmiendation - Staff recommr,:19 final plat approval per the attached resolution. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF BAYSIDE WOODS FILE NO. 1442 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe dei-elopment of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision by the Landschute Group, Inc., the subdivider; and WHEREAS, on September 25, 1989 the City Coun-il approved Resolution #2705 granting preliminary approval for a plat at 375 Leaf Street/3300 Bayside Road; and WHEREAS, the proposed plat contains two lots each exceeding the 2.0 acre minimum Ict area requirement of the LR-lA zoning district. Lots 1 and 2 require a variance to the 200' lot width requirement as measured at the rear of the 50' front yard abutting Bayside Road or Leaf Street; and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all other standards of the LR-lA zoning district, finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that will allow its use as a single family residence to be fully developed without the need for further variances; and WHEREAS, both proposed lots have been demonstrated to contain suitable sites for primary and alternate drainfields to serve the proposed single family residences; and WHEREAS, proposed Lot 1 is intended to be served by a private driveway accessing to Bayside Road, subject to a Hennepin County Access Permit. Lot 2 is intended to be served by a private driveway accessing to Leaf Street, subject to City approval of the access location; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1. Completion of all the requirements of Resolution #2705. Pace 1 of 3 2. Dedication on the plat of rights -of -way for public streets and roads, shown as Leaf Street. 3. Dedication to the City of a Flowage & Conservation Easement providing for limitations on the use of wetlands and drainageways described therein and shown on the plat as "drainage easements". 4. Dedication on the plat drawings of Drainage and Utility Easements for drainageways crossing the property near Leaf Street and Bayside Road. 5. Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fe. in the amount of $ 400.00. 6. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing fee in the amount of $150.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Bayside Woods, Hennepin County, Minnesota; subject to the following condition: 1. A variance is hereby granted for Lots 1 and 2 to the 200' lot width standard. 2. Lot 1 shall access to Bayside Road subject to Hennepin County access permit. Lot 2 shall access to Leaf Street subject to City approval of the access location. 3. No building permits will be issued and no permitted driveway construction or other excavation may be commenced until such time that the primary and alternate drainfield sites have been fenced off to eliminate disturbance of same (see Exhibit A attached). 4. Applic•snt shall adhere to the screening/planting plan for the area of the driveway for Lot 1, attached hereto as Exhibit B. 5. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office on or before May 13, 1990 together with a certified original copy of this Resolution and executed copies of the Conservation & Flowage Easement noted above. Page 2 of 3 The approval gr--nted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed oy the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of the Orono, Minnesota on this 13th day of November, 1989. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Acting Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of November, 1989, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr., & Dorothy M. Hallin, Acting Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Nitary Public My Commission Expires Page 3 of 3 BAYSIDE WOODS NI.S NO \43 / \( 4U0 1p 43, 1 r � �1 � � � X C • f hr dtJ rs and rIs Nty w�a.war 2 i,, E �sbdcda .ofawdl.la X C E P T I O N ,iG.Jlda I OV� w ,.'ow w, lA 16 a/Ioq O •• I rr day � i i 1 •1; - wrsr' i lir � 1 JAL I om manuiligni : w JNarsw J{.e a { { JUAYSIDE RD) r wwr sa — — — — — • GO. NO M MM � {,w dW R, Aui fuLd l; W{ STIEtVIVS AMMON SCM OE L L A MADSONJ INC. s N aIt s �I . -sr er J14* ha'Ur d as s, r m. a to lam+ a Plan) a— -P shown" amr..d sv.EcT a cW a GMEETIM . \,� h••b / and Pain . y �/na e --- - - e/4 9 � 1 as�tnenf ' r_ Iv/ r.^ Lin , L1I iUn o / ✓ 2a I g I I R2 A i Piz Line i - ,qQ q�b —� � 10 o+C0�10 ( \ \ \ 10 I L 10, 132 0 1 --q- glP19 IS 1 q�y ) 00 �ttlSTl �i �� •'''---��1. i `i PINS '. � MA �l- Y I o Movable Shed and o � /2J qs e . Drr'fle /A./ 0 5'c clar Septic --- - -- coffin o5b � I q54 r qsl \ N �I .50 City of ORONO 1. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2705 A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A A PLAT AT 375 LEAP STREET AND 3300 BAYSIDE ROAD APPLICATION NO. 1442 WHEREAS, The Landschute Group, Inc. (hereinafter "the applicants") on July 27, 1989 filed a formal subdivision application with the ` ty for approval of a two -lot residential plat of property legally described as: All of Lot 12, Auditor's Subdivision Number 203, Hennepin County, Minnesota, EXCEPT that part described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner thereof: thence West along the south line of said Lot 12 a distance of 310 feet; thence North and parallel with the east line of said Lot 12. to the right-of-way line of the Minnesota Western Railroad; thence Southeasterly along the Northerly line of said Lot 12 to the Northeast corner thereof; thence South 80 feet to place of beginning. All of Lot 13, Auditor's Subdivision Number 203, Hennepin County, Minnesota, EXCEPT that part described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner thereof; thence West along the North line of said Lot 13 a distance of 310 feet; thence South and parallel with the East line of said Lot 13 a distance of 124.7 feet; thence East and parallel with the North line of said Lot 13 a distance of 310 feet; thence North 124.7 feet to place of beginning. All of Lot 18 and the West 121 feet of Lot 16 in Auditor's Subdivision Number 203, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property") and; WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zvaing and Platting Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 21, 1989, at which time all persons desiring to be heerd concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meetings held on September 11 and September 25, 1989, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of The Landschute Group, Inc. noting the following findings of fact: Page 1 of 5 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY LOUNCIL NO. 2705 1. The property is located within the LR-lA Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2. The property contains a total of approximately 5.82 acres of land. 3. Lot 1 contains 3.25 total acres of land, of which 2.28 acres of dry buildable land are contiguous with the proposed building site; Lot 2 contains 2.57 tc,t.al acres of land of which 2.5 acres of dry buildable land are contiguous with the proposed building site. 4. Roth Lots 1 and 2 require a variance for lot width at the rear of the 50' front yard setbacx. Lot 1 contains 121.0 feet in defined width where 200.0 feet in width is required, a variance of 79.0 feet. Lot 2 contains 70.0 feet in defined width where 200.0 feet in width is required, a variance of 130.0 feet. Each lot contains 200 or more feet of width at the proposed house location. 5. Lot 1 will access to Bayside Road (County Road 84) and is subject to a Hennepin. County access permit. Lot 2 will access to Leaf Street ane :. subject to City approval of the access location. 6. The City will require a 20' wide drainage easement over each of Lo::s 1 and 2 for the minor creek traversing the lots near their respective road access points. Each driveway crossing of these drainageways will require installation of a culvert to be approved by the City Engineer. 7. The City wil require a Conservation and Flowage Easement over the designated floodplain of "unnamed Tributary to Stubbs Bay" on Lots J. and 2. 8. Both Lots 1 and 2 have been demonstrated to contain suitable sites for primary and alternate drainfields to serve the proposed single family residences. 9. Single family residences can be constructed on both Lo!-a 1 and 2 without the need for further variances. Page 2 of 5 t City of OR,ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL M 2705 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, thrit based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the prelim, nary rlat for The Landschute Group, Inc. at 375 Leaf Street an_ 1:; o Payside Road per the survey dated July 17, 1987, re•rised September :, 1, ] -87 . = lsed July 24, 1989 by Theodore D. Kemna, S=hoell anu Madson, iiiz. (see Exhibit A attached) subject to the following conditions: 1. A variance will be granted to the 200' let width standard f or Lots 1 and 2. 2. Lot 1 shall access to Bayside Road subject to a Hennepin County access permit. Lot 2 shall access to Leaf Street sum ject to Cit;r approval of the access location. 3. A Conservation and Flowage easement document shall be executed for the designated floodplain of "unnamed Tributary to Stubbs Bay" over Lots 1 and 2, and this eas=ment shall be shown on the plat drawings as a drainage easement. 4. No building permits will be issued and no permitted drivew• construction or other excavation may be commenced until such time that the primary and alternate drainfield sites have been fenced off to eliminate disturbance of same. ( See Exhil, t A attached.) 5. Applicant shall provide a screening/panting plan for review by staff and Council prior to final plat approval. The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly schedu_" d Council meeting on the second and fourth Mo: %lays of the mo . 1. RECORD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1"-200'. Drawing to include: a) Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Theodore D. Remna dated July 17, 1987, revised September 21, 1987, revised July 24, 1989. b) Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' wide along all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of internal property lines. c) Designation and dedication of a 20' drainage easement within each of Tots 1 and 2 nenr the road access points, and of a drainage easem lnt for the floodplain cf the major creek on Lots 1 nd 2, gill `o be shown a "drainage easements" on thf P 3e 3 of 5 City of ORONO fi =SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2705 ,OCUMENTS rey...Lred: a) Title opinion addressed to the City. Ali owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b) The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. c) Signed End executed Flowage & Conservation Easement; blank area required description may be filled out as follows "over the drainage easements as shown on cne plat of (plat name)". 3. FEES TO BE PAID: ioC:il Due $550.00 a) Park Dedication Fee - 2 new residential lots at 2- acre density - $200.00 per lot. Total $4nn nn_ b) Legal review and filing fees of $150.00. Adopted by the City Council of the City of I)rono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 25th day of September, 1989. ATTE T: orothy M allin, ty C_ =_r Page 4 of 5 / Acting Mayor' i.i I t v� L." i&I ' err OF,-RX H. 1�"y;: . 4UV -r�rnr�nnn 13� r vtvvvvv vv (��'y( C1'76G�{ 1 L.W ov. . vY i�tL4iCer`i��i� VliU "P4 #: v L"W' PV4 S: Vl 1 A 11 'V&.. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 27C 5 -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) day of , 198_ On this county,ersonall before me a Notary Public within and for said kno nto me to be appeared the person(s) described in and whc executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STD. 'E OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) day of , 198 , before me On this y y Pared a Nor_ary Public within and for said County, personall appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instru-ment, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC My COty1yISSION EXPIRES Page 5 of 5 �pored -r. — �: . ;� ; . i• •t•,��' ..,3;.� .., ' . Ina fuse n �' oil, i At ol F1, I, � _ � •iSecbndoryS•jofreLaov{rer►' •- '�• lane o{(ot r4.lu_=� in5rc'0 C, `N. line oiCof : I: .NEr�,�r�er ior_o - ri Piz ,rr� i t 4 a9 -- �Jne rn ,er,�V,r�'',..: !-'I '. t,�o a Go , {orro ''y • '° I Lin pero„e.t w, rrr�r, �tl ii�e •'' L-f>^ I I \ .Ik 17 v et� ► ce , j y,, �!/mvbla $lied j e// ,� and Uf,//t as meat .-.:• �i ;;� Lis: o - j(�s� / X PRAM r ! Z: Ro• 's ..4A�.. o(JNrr Ro. No.64 { 1 - , ►� • r' i ii'7 •at' 1 t tl i t // oR, 4), 6 TO: Mayor ' rabek UNCII 41EETING Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Planning Commission Members Noy 13 1989 City Administrator Bernhardson CITY OF pRpNO FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE: October 11, 1989 SUBJ: #1463 Contel of Minnesota, Tonkaview and County Road 19 Conditional Use Permit/Variance-Public Hearing List of Exhibits - A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Map of Service Area E - Hardcover Fact Sheet F - Lynch Report G - Floor Plan H - McCurdy Letter 10/8/89 I - Contel of Minnesota Needs Statement J - Lease Agreement K - Elevations/Spec Sheets/Floor Plan L - Survey M - Staff Sketch Please review Exhibit F, Mike Lynch's Report. Lynch has assumed responsibility for the review of this application. Pertinent Ordinances - Section 10.20, subdivision 3d (LR-lB, Section 10.24, subdivision 3a) - Conditional Use Permit required for public utility structure to be installed on residential lot. A 50' setback is required from all reesidential lot lines. a) North Residential Lot Line Required = 50' Proposed = 34' Variance = 16' or 32% b) Scuth Residential Lot Line Required = 50' Proposed = 46' Variance = 4' or 8% Section 10.24 - Street Setback c) Street Lot Line Required = 35' Proposed = 35' Variance Not Required as 50' setback for public service Memo - Zoning File #1463 October 11, 198' Page Two of Three structure is requited only from residential lot lines. Brief Review of Application - Contel proposes installation of a remote switch building measuring 10 x 16 on a property owned by Fairview Covenant Church located directly across County Road 19 within the City of Minnetrista. The remote switch building meets the required street setback of 35' but does not meet the required 50' setback from the adjacent residential lot lines (i of er to the findings noted above and Exhibit M). Hardships have not been submitted with the application, but applicant advised that because of the narrow width of the lot the residential 50' setback could never be maintained from the north and south lot line unless structure was moved to the rear of the property. In addition, applicant notes that to move it to the most mid position in the widest area of the property would prevent the Church from expanding a parking lot to the east side of the lot. If applicant moves structure to the south maintaining the 35' setback, a setback variance would still be required from the south lut line. Applicant should be prepared to demonstrate why the relocation of the structure will have an impact on future parking expansion to the east on the Church property. Please review Mr. McCurdy's letter. Applicant should be prepared to respond as to feasibility of relocating air conditioning units to either south or east side of structure. In addition applicant should provide further information on emission of sound emitting from the air conditioning units a:id frequency of use of these cooling units. Is there a sound barrier wall that could be considered outside of normal plantings? The lease agreemen} o various further improvements of the property agreed t- icant in lieu of being allowed to install the remote lding on property. Staff would suggest that any furthe ,ruvements on the Church property are subject to the Church filing a separate application with the City for expansion of parking areas and other extra ciricular facilities. It should also be noted that we cannot address facilities used by the Church that are not on the Church property, such as basketball hoop and outdoor grill. The Church would be well advised to acquire the adjacent tax forfeit property where intormal improvements have been installed. The following con-iitions must be met if application is to be approved: Memo - Zoning File #1463 October 11, 1989 Page Three of Three 1. Building should be of earthy colors to blend into the surrounding natural setting. 2., Air conditioning units re -installed on either south or /dcast wall away from north residential lot line. Permanent plantings installed along north side of structure to shield residence to north minimizing visual 'impact. 4. Appropriate improvements to lessen impact of sound from cooling equipment. 5. Owner of property is advised to seek separate land use application with City for further improvement of property. C � I � —�� - Q Cl tijbr't-�" � " � - �t�P�U �lL �E`�•�-. ' 'h*'' �. r �.k S PJ�v! =£ CCNr t F�_(:u = �' c�+.�� N � O!� w�:T Fad �`-- 50�•►T�e � t D�cS . �.�vtz; c.4� t�P!'WrN �-_+ e• E S� s;�:, rrN� ��e. S off Q.Q�II� r2�o�Z 'r?� Cowvr�� LTG Zoning File #14�3 November 9, 1989 Page 4 of 5 Additional Co®ents and Planning Commission Recom=endation - Additional Rxhibit - Exhibit N - Landscar� Plan The Planning Commission addressed the neighbor to the north's concern with the noise impact on his residential property. Applicant explained that the air conditioners had to be located at the rear or end portion of the structure because of the interior layout and interior equipment design of the structure. The air conditioning units could not be located on the entrance side of the structure because of the lack of space. It was noted that two air conditioners would be installed with one unit to serve as a back-up. The air conditioner would be turned on only to maintain a temperature between 75 and 80 degrees. Only one unit would ever be in use. The applicant advised that the noise level in similar to an air conditioner for a residential structure at 5,000 btu level. The same type of unit is installed for residential structures. It was noted by staff that an air conditioning unit could have been installed on a residential structure located only 10' from the shared lot line. Existine vegetation along both sides of the north side lot line were noted. A neighbor on the west side of County Road 19 asked about the possibility of screening from his residence (west side of proposed structure). Members also questioned the applicant as to why the structure could not be, placed to the extreme east where the 50' setback could be met. Applicant advised that it was necessary to locate on the west portion of the property because of existing telephone and power ?.ines and necessary hook-up for the equipment within the structi• re. Please review the Planning Commission minutes of October 16, 1989 for more back -ground information on this review. six members of the Planning Commission recommended approval. The one dessenting member denied the application finding that all options of relocating the structure on the property were not considered by the applicant, and that the City failed to address the concerns of the neighbor to the north regarding the noise impact. The enclosed resolution has been drafted subject to the recommendation of approval by the Planning Commission and includes the following conditions: 1. The remote switch building is to be constructed of earthy colors in order to blend into surrounding natural setting. Zoning File #1463 November 9, 1989 P7f 5 of 5 2. Additional coniferous landscaping to be provided along west and south side of structure, providing screening from residential properties on west side of County Road 19 and to south on Tonka View. Such landscape plan was to be submitted prior to the Council meeting allowing staff time to review and for Council's approval (please review Exhibit PI). The applicant shall provide 5 black hill spruce trees along south and west side of structure. This type was selected because of the tendency of the trees to expand at sides. 3. Fairview Covenant Church, as owners of the subject property, must seek a separate land use application with the City for additional improvements to the property. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 3 (A) FILE #1463 WHEREAS, Fairview Covenant Church (hereinafter "the owner") is the owner the property .Located at 1140 North Shore Drive West within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Exhibit A attached (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, Contel of Minnesota (hereinafter "the applicant") proposes to lease from the owner the use of the above referenced property for a remote switch building measuring 101xl6'; snd WHEREAS, per Section 10.24, Subdivision 3 (A), the applicant has made application to the City for a conditional use permit to allow the installation of a remote switch building and in addition seeks setback variances to Section 10.24, Subdivision 3 (A) as follows: A) North Lot Line: Required = 50' Proposed = 34' Variance = 16' or 32% B) South Lot Line: Required = 50' Proposed = 46' Variance = 4' or 8% NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1463. 2. The property is located in the LR-lB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 1 acre in area. Page 1 of 5 3. The property consists of 43,395 s.f. or 1.042 acres. 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on October 16, 1989 and recommended approval of the conditional use permit to permit the installation of the remote switch building as proposea requiring approval of residential lot line setback variances as noted above based on the following findinqs: A) The shape of the property prevents the structure from being placed at the required location without requiring setback variances. B) The location of power lines and existing telephone lines require that the structure be placed to the west side of the property. C) The proposed utility use is compatible with the current usi of the property as an expanded parking and recreation. area for the Fairview Covenant Church. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the installation of a remove switch building as proposed will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in Keeping with the intent and objectives of the 'Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit Section 10.24, Subdivision 3 (A) to permit the installation of the remote switch building as proposed by Contel of Minnesota requiring the approval of setback vmriances, north lot line proposed at 34' instead of the required 501, and south lot line proposed at 46' instead of the required 501, subject to the following conditions: 1. The remote switch building should be of earthy colors to blend into the surrounding natural setting. 2. Applicant to provide landscaping along the west and south sides of the utility building per landscape plans set forth can site plan by Peter M. Brozik revised date November 7, 1989. 3. Owner of property is hereby advised to seek a s .karate land use application with the City of Orono for any further improvement of this property. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run w.'' the property not with the applicant, but are permissive c r and must be exercised by application for a building permit for the retaining walls within one year of the date of Council approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (November 13, 1990). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of tnis resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. b. The undersigned owner and applicant have read, un'Qrstood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of •:itle of the property. Page 3 of 5 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 13th day of November, 1989. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Representative cf Fairview Covenant Church Title Representative of Contel of Minnesota Title STATE OF MINNESOTA ) 9s. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of November 1989, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Acting Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public My Commission Expires Fage 4 of 5 CITY OF ORONO - G?NMLXL LAND USE APPLICATION --------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION _1 Site Address Corner of Tonkaview Lane Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 07-117-23-23-0907 Please check one - Property abstract or X torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included CI1Y OF 01?� on required survey. S��xbih.i 9______-- _ f' . £ OFF:CF -----------•-------�------------(-----------��------ APPLICANT Phone home 472-7 C1 N J4& k NT-TH+4 �t YU Name fontel of Minnesota, Inc. Phone (work) 681- � �' Oj•.U4:39 Jy 1' 1; $9 Address 1300 Mend)ta Heights 3 ,dd City St. Paul Zip 55150 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ONiNP.R (if different than applicant) Phone (home) 472-1721 Name Fairview Covc ant Church Phone Address 1175 Co. Kd. 019 City Hound Zip Date Property Acqui�ad 9 -(o a (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. ------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- FEES - CONDITIONAL %,dE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After -the -Fact Fee - Double Current application Fee $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use $150.00 b) Instituticnal (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg X $250.00 d) C ir_"Industrial Use $2^0.00 f) L_ •ration X _ 50.00 g; Var; land filling - designated wetland or dplain _ :ng and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more ding; seawall, retaining walls within 75' v. Irkeshore PRD/PID - see foe scheduie OTHER APPLICATIONS $150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation _ a150.00 Easement Vacation $ 50.00 Easement vacation with Subdivision $250.00 Rezoning $100.00 Appeals _ Other - see fee scheduls PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential x Other (specify) Church Parking Lot/Play Ar ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detuil: _mantel to lease a small parcel of vacant lane to place a cmall in, X 1A' pCC (remote s',yi`^h) hij Fling `horonn ...--------------------------•--------------•---------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1.. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owner:.; 1•ist of owners within 350' (}ou can obtain this list from Hennepin Cr:.iity Department of Finance A-6( 3 Government Center 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envel^L"s (410) pre -addressed to each if the na:nss or. the above list with no zeturn address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 6. Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requizements). 7. Plat :dap. 8. As an addenL to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. ------- --------- --------------------------------------------------------- Certification L� zoning Depart- -nt that Land Use App?.icatiori is complete•. Zoning Official. ignature Date --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT' S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred ii_ review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Con' 1 of •Mi esc a, Inc Applicant's signature Date g1 (lj!jq Adm-Public Affairs OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reason:ole entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. irview.Covenant Ch Owner's signature �.,.{,�,�/,, -pj/, Ly, ate 9/20%Sg ------------------------ �_� a �.1 ----------------------------------- Applicant must have ali submittals intca-� the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Plarning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be prPsnnt at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commivgi•on and (.�ouncii. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please maze arrangements to have a:: authorizer' .agent attend in your place az,d advise the Huil-ing & Zonin Office Qf thi5 charge prior to the meeting. EXHIBIT "A" LF:4' DESCRIPTION: FAIRVIEW COVENANT CHURCH CITY OF ORONO, HFNNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA THAT PART OF LCT 7 PARCEL #07-117-23-23-0007 Metes .4kn,4 Bounds Description: COM AT X PT DIS 2224 4&10 FT SLY F?.')' 4r.. N R.TNE OF SEC ALONG A Ll ' ' FUNNING FlOM A PT IN THE N 1. 'THEREOF DIS 402 5610 FT E r'ROM THE NW. CORNER THEREO? A PT IN THE S LINE OF NW 1 4 DIS 395 5610 FT E FROM THE 5W COR THEREOF TH SLY ALONG SAID LINE TO N LINE OF BERGQUIS,l.- AND WICKLUNDS ADDN TO BEP.GQUIST AD WICKLUNDS PARK HENN CO MIUN TH WLY ALONG SAME AND ALONG THE N LINE OF BERGQUIST AND WICKLUNDS I. -ARK HENN CO MINN TO W LINE OF SEC TH N ALONG SAID SEC TO A PT IN A LINE RUNNING w "A` *4ITH N LINE OF SEC FROM PT OF BEG TH E TO B :; EX ROAD. LEGAL SURVEY TO GOVERN AND UPON ACTUAL PLACrMENT OF BUILrING FACILITY AGREED TO BY THE LANDLORD, TENAN- AND APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES. Al I J ls.• / ! o 4 lye ` 0 �s-- = = (4 3) i /• tp !0 `� b to ° IIL - 7 I • r �',� r 4 3 r o'� In / yes ► 10 [ .7 A 09 • � �, 1 �i/ qq C .may/_ ' ! ✓ •'' O - (` pA t1 T 69 !1/ 1�,1�1 ° t• + ��I�Iz a ►I iRh1 I~ FIRT` A r ° 4'C too 410 .,,JJJ •� leer�QL 47 orrL9) «/ • V ' `� 1 7i' t 4 . ' ` w 3 rF��- O'if/ - —/ t[•,t .u. 141,09 test) ` l (� I �c '� Y•vJ�/y/ :. 2 `. towt•vr[M ' ` N' L •I ' a ofor 5 r 49 co R lid f fit r� Cov[ 4 �'„` �i 74 li 72 ' 1+ •• N'�•• . tr'. Q� � ti 1 (�•\`�, x a = d Point L♦•• N.le.11.20ae1 Mt •p•T• r � ,1 i1' >;,,,,�,3 \ • �\/fir 4 s �.J' !,� 1 \ � A. fW'D or LOT 14 ntz PPOWpanx,fte.• N•n ncN°4 2t.0 �7 00 ! t l ows-or-2a%A� N E S• POi 1 r E3' T_ 12-117-24 14 0013 HAL `1 E OHL ENKA MP 3684 SE LAKEVIEW ROAD BRAINERD FIN 56401 SIB'S 07-117-23 23 0001 0 LARRY LEE YORKTON LTD 1690 UNIVERSITY AVE 3550 ST PAUL MN 55104 #/238 07-117-23 23 0007 FAIRVIEW COVENANT CHURCH 1175 COUNTY RO 19 MOUND MN 55364 A,,& 38 07-117-23 23 0013 STATE LAND DEPT 38 07-117-23 23 0018 STEVEN E 6 DIANE M TACK 15627 PINE MOUNTAIN HOUSTON TX 77084 ,12-11a4 13 DEAN w 6 CAROL JO BAILEY 1055 CO RO 19 MOUND MN 55364 "336 12-117-24 1A 0019 FRED C E SHIRLEY J ROYLE 1105 CO AD NO 19 VJUNO MN 55364 38 07-117-23 23 0004 BRIAN E PETERSON 1100 NORTH SHORE OR MOUND MN 55364 �1338 07-117-23 23 0010 STEVEN VALEK BOX 386 SPRING PARK MN 5 53 b4 38 07-117-23 32 0 05 7 LELAND E PATRICIA MARTINEAU 4755 TONKAVIEW LANE MOUND MN 55364 417 38 07-117-23 Z' 001S ST-''EN E L DIANE M TACK 150 7 PINE MOUNTAIN HOUSTON TX 77084 .*Z 38 07-117-23 23 00[6 STEVEN F VALEK BOX 366 SPRING PARK MN 55384 I :0236 12-117-24 14 0011 FAIRVIEW COVENANT CHURCH 1175 COUNTY RO 19 MOUND MN 55364 46 36 17-117-24 41 0001 JAMES . THOMPSON 4801 MINNEAPOLIS AVE MCUNO MN 55364 -$/G 38 07-117-23 23 0005 JAY A LEZER 1120 NORTH SHORE OR WEST MOUND MN 55364 Njq 38 07-117-23 23 0011 RALPH WINTON PALMER 4750 TONKAVIEW LA MOUND MN 55364 *%T38 07-117-23 23 0016 STEVEN E E DIANE M TACK 15627 PINE MOUNTAIN HOUSTON TX /7084 #2Z38 07-117-23 32 0012 JEFFREY J MARSHALL 4784 NORTH SHORE OR MOUND AN '_5364 TOTAL LABELS BA'CH 005 00024 y l�) LL n c,r . 1,1,E I I1 I Y1 �d335 12-111-24 '14 0012 FAIRVIEW COVENANT CHURCH 1175 CCUN's Y RO 19 MOUND MN 55364 -47 36 12-117-24 41 0002 M K SATERSTROM L L H N4LSON 6124 11TH AVE S MPLS MN 55417 18 07-117-23 23 0006 HOWARD MCCUROY 1130 NO SHORE OR W MOUND AN 55364 4f)g 38 07-117-23 23 0012 RALPH WINTGN PALMER 4750 TONKAVIEW MOUND MN 55364 38 07-111-23 23 0017 STEVEN E L DIANE M TACK 15627 PINE MOUNTAIN HOUSTON TX 77034 *'38 07-117-23 32 0013 ,;' 6WEN M CUPCNT 4798 NORTH SHORE OR MOUND AN 55364 3 -'Sc' Bay "tILONAMCK RO 0 orth Maxwell INI E. T R i 5 T Bay &.ft r7n Jenninors Bay lial! Mi 46- Smith Bay ti7 A 11'eit An CrV5tal Bay Si- larri" 1 s Day ti ffjlE "A Hllxl�,- %%ARRP W. 1-400"Welohm IX Lafayette Buy P ti Mq)YN 2 . 2 Bay 10 < 22 .0 (,-.f)k5 Day 7, h 0 n ar 0 nay I 1A I-S I FA MS RA 27 �V Is I ION Gidcon Day f ........ . . .14 Mj 71 31 1 64a ----] 32'.1 FN A mµoTs- -5mw I Tcj-, lFoz- G o fV re L OG A,4 ► JV K7, proregXY 1i> -007 I-V_ A c C.O.M. uo 0(&o 9 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET . SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 15-250' 250-500' 0O-1000 EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE -------------------------- A. HOUSE Ia X ��/' J�o S.F. LENGTH WIDTH _. X S.F. X S.F. X S.F. X S.F. B. GARAGE X S.F. C. DRIVEWAY X ��'•'' _ �/ �'9z �S�S.F. XS.F. �^ D. SIDEWALK X S.F. X - S.F. X S.F. E. ATIO/ ECK X S.F. F.LANDSCAPE X AREAS ) :' UNDERLAIN BY X S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING _ X S.F. X S. F. G. OTHER X = S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE - -------------- �S % Z ' S.F. EA] , TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE - q S� S.F. 1E Bones t roo Rosene 0 Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects October 4, 1989 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Jeanne Maousth Re: Contel of Minnesota Remote Switch Building Our File No. 139-1463 Dear Jeanne: Ono G Boneuroo PE Korth A Goroon PE WNW C lynch. PE Ph -hp 1 Caswerr Pt Room W Rosene. PE Rjcgmd W Fouer PE lames R MUno a. PE Mart D Waws. PE Joseph C AnC.+m. rt Dasard C Buryardt. PE Kenneth P Anderson. PE Thorns R Anoerson. A r A &adbord A LtmUe% PE :terry A Bmwon PE Kertn A Bachmann PE Gary F R xxW PE Rtnanj E turner PE A . A Hanson PE Mart R RDdL PE Chants A Er[kson James C CKson. PE Teo K -Z" T t Roten C Ruslek A I A Leo M Pawe iky Glenn R Cook PE M. heel T Rautmarsn PE Thomas E Arqui PE H", M Ctlson Thomas E No^ PE Pawn R Pkfferse. Pr Howard A Swiced PE Susan M Eden++ CPA Room G kh rKrff PE Dar a O Los*xA E Darker j Edge"en PE Mann L Sorv" PE Tnxrus W Pm,rson PE Min A Sep PE We have reviewed the submittal for the remote switch building by Contel of Minnesota. The building should be of earthy colors to blend into the surroundings rather than the white vinyl siding with gray shingles and door proposed.. Add landscaping as necessary so that the property owner to the East is not able to see the structure from his residence. We are in agreement with the hard cover calculations presented. This review is for placement of the remote switch building only. The owner shall be advised that any additional improvements need to be approved by the City of Orono. Please _ontact me if you have any question. Yours very truly, BONES:1,100, ROSENE, AIDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, I,10. Michael C. Lynch MCL:dh 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 I � � With Contel's commitment to 'Quality, Low Cost, Service', Contel considered three options to providing service to the growing Saga Hill area population. Option one, a remote switch unit, was selected because it meet Contel's commitment ;.o 'Quality, Low Cost, Service'. Option two was to place another feeder cooper cable from the Central Switching Office across tie Jennings Bay of Lake Minnetonka to serve the growing population in Saga Hill area. Option three was to place feeder cable from the Centra. Switching Off',._e to serve the growing population in the Saga Hill area. (See Attached Drawn, 41, OPT ON *1 The remote switchin3 unit is a new option for telephone companies. A remote switching unit allows telephone companies to take a small part of the new digital central switch to remote location like Saga Hill. The remote switch provides dial tone and switching at that site ir, a very small pack3_e and is connecter: to the central switching offic^ via existing cable feeder plant . Since Contel already has cable to the Saga Hill Area from two direction, a lake route and the land route plated many years ago the connection to the central switch unit is very secure and unlikely to be interrupted. Contel will not have to place ar.ymore high cost per foot copper plant from the central switching unit to the Saga Hill area. This particular site in Saga Hill was selected by Contel to make the greatest use of existing copper distribution plant to 572 customers with out having to modify the voice carrying characteristics of the distribution plant. This site allows Contel to have less than 15,000 feet of distribution cable to the furthest customer from the remote switching unit. Beyond a distance 15,000 feet, the distribution plant would have to be modified to have good voij-e carrying characteristics. The reroute site will need to be visited an average of once a week. with Contel's vehicles entering a leaving the site from Tonk.aview Lane. The remote switching unit and it's building will not produce any noises other than-.orm•al sounds of two residential air conditioners. Option t2 Option two was to place large feeder cable from the central switching office to the Saga Hill area going .across the lake. This option was considered unacceptable due to the lake's level having dropped and the possibility of I%aving service interrupted by placement of boat docks, future dredging operation, or even boat propellers. A boat dock. placed in 1978, damaged one Contel's existing cable across the lake. Contel found at that time service would be interrupted for a extend period time, due to the distance and sice of the cables. The cables and splicing closures in the lake are not stock itess. Option #3 Option three was to place enough cable on the lind route to provide service to the customers in Saga Hill. The option was twice the cost of the other option and the existing distribution cables to the customers would have to be a:-e3tly modified to provide the proper -voice carrying transmission characteristics. 48 1 T e N N I o n U co. RD. isl I 20,470' (3.88 MILES) FEEDER CABLE if If ANINGS DAY vv("A ANU POINT SEE DETAIL A R OPTION 1 �\ REMOTE m sw� cx �\� 7� \ FOREST LAKE WEST DETAIL A Jennlnps Boy war Arm Lokf MinnHonkc - .. , arts &.*-" ttt�ttt MaI� ��p ♦tr4 M 'Mtt aN'tt tt• tMtt N tNtiJM� M't GOVT. LOT 3 ---- DAMAGED UNREPAIRABLE 1978 l - • J LEASE OF PROPERTY AGR EMENT THIS LEASE AGh,!EMENT, executed in duplicate, made and entered into this day of September , A.D. 1989 b- and between FairviRw Covenant Church hereinafter called "Landlord", whose address for the purpose of this lease is, 1175 Co Rd 119, Mound, MN 55364 and Contel of Minnesota Tnc., hereinafter called the "Tenant", whose address the purpose of this lease J.s 1300 Mendota Height,: Road, Box 50770, St. Paul, Minnesota 55150, WITNESSETH THAT: 1. 3�MISES ..ND TERM: The Landlord, in consideration of the rents herein reserved and of the agreements and conditions herein contained, on the part of the Tenant to be kept and performed, leases unto the Tenant and Tenant hereby rents and leases from Landlord, according to the terms and provisions herein, the following described real estate, situated in the City of Orono, Hennepin County,Stat( of Minnesota, TO WIT: See Exhibit "A" Legal Description. L -- 1 0f 10 with the improvements thereon and all rights, easements and appurtenances thereto belonging, which, more part'.cularly, includes the space and ^miser as may be shown on ' hibi;_ 8", if and as may be r:. ad hereto, for a term of 1(10) years, commencing at mice. tght of the )revious to the first day of the lease term, which shall be on the 1st day of October, 1989, and ending at midnight on the last day of the lease term, --jhich shall be on the 2.,th dr.:• temberL 1999. 2. RENTAL. Tenant agrees to pay to Landlort- leas: rental fur said first TEN (10) term the s+im of in advance. *n addition to cash rental See Exh-bit "C" for a6ditionai cons+..c-,—at-oils from the Teraat to the Landlord. 3. "0,1 SF.SSION. tenant shall be entitled to possession on the first day of the term -I this lease, and shall yield possession L�, the Landlc;d at the time of the close of this lease term. excel.•c as ;l fin otherwise expresply provided. 4. USE OF PREMISFS. Tenant covenants and agrees during the term of this: lease to ,:se and to occ:xpy the leasec preir.,stj only for a telephone switching sl a ano built,+ing and fa- such other relate,•:+ telephony activities incider th tele-communications rperation of she Mound, Sacra _Hii.1 Orono surrounding aLeas and other area subdivisions present and future rt,quiring telephony communicatio„ Systems. Pace 2 of 10 5. INDEMNITY AND LIABILITY INSURANCE. Except as to any negligence on the part of either party, each party will protect, indemnify and save harmless each other fror, and against any and all loss, costs, damage and expenses occasioned by, or arising out of, any accident or other occurrence causing or inflicting injury and/or damage to any person or property, happening or done, in, upon or about the leased premises, or due dir6ctly or irdirectly to the ownership or tenancy, use or occupancy thereof, or any part thereof by the parties or any person claiming through or under either party. Each party further covenants and agrees that it will, at its own expense, procure and maintain casualty and liability insurance in a responsible company or companies authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota, in amounts not mess than $100,000.00 for any one person injured, and $500,000.00 for any one accident, and with the limits of $25,,000.00 for property damage, protecting each other anains�t such claim, damages, costs or expenses on account of injury to any person or person, or to any property belonging to any person or persons, by reason of such casualty, accident or other happening on or about the demised premises during the term thereof. Page 3 of 10 6. SIGNS. Tenant shall have the right and privilege of attaching, affixing, or exhibiting identity logo signs on the leased premises, the building, provided only (1) That any and all signs shall comply with the ordinances of the city or municipality in which the property is located and the laws of the State of Minnesota, (2) Such signs shall not change the structure of the building. 7. MECHANIC'S LIENS. Neither the Tenant nor anyone claiming by, through, or under the Tenant, shall have the right to file or place any mechanic's lien or other lien of any kind or character whatsoever, upon said premises or upon any building or improvement thereon, or upon the leasehold interest of the Tenant therein, and notice is hereby given that no contractor, sub -contractor, or anyone else who may furnish any material, service or labor for any building, improvements, alteration, repairs or any part thereof, shall at any time be or become entitled to any lien thereon, and for the further security of the Landlord, the Tenant covenants and agrees to give actual notice thereof in advance, to any and all contractors and sub -contractors who may furnish or agree to furnish any such material, service or labor. Page 4 of 10 8. RIGHTS CUMULATIVE. The various rights, powers, options, elections and remedies of either party, provided in this lease, shall be construed as cumulative and no one of them as exclusive of the others, or exclusive of any rights, remedies or priorities allowed either party by law, and shall in no way affect or impair the right of either party to pursue any other equitable or legal remedy to which either party may be entitled as long as any default remains in any way unremedied, unsatisfied or undischarged. 9. NOTICES AND DEMANDS. Notices as provided for in this lease shall be given to the respective parties hereto at the respective addresses designated on page one of this lease unless either party notifies the other, in writing, of a different address. Without prejudice to any other method of notifying a party in writing or making a demand or other communication, such message shall be considered given under the terms of this lease when sent, addressed as above designated, postage prepaid, by registered or certified mail, return rece.Lpt requested, by the United States rail and so deposited in a United States mailbox. 10. PROVISIONS TO BIND AND BENEFIT SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNS, Each -and every covenant and agreement herein contained shall extend to and be binding upon the respective successors, heirs, administrators, executors and assigns of the parties hereto; except that if any part of this lease is held in Joint tenancy, the successor in interest shall be the surviving joint tenant. Page 5 of 10 11. CHANGES TO BE IN WRITING. None of the covenants, provisions, terms or conditions of this lease to be kept or performed by Landlord or Tenant shall be in any manner modified, waived or abandoned, except by a written instru- ment duly signed by the parties and delivered to the Landlord and Tenant. This lease contains the whole agreement of the parties. 12. CONSTRUCTION. Words and phrases herein, including acknowledgment hereof, shall be construed as in the singular or plural number, and as masculine, feminine or neuter gender according to the context. 13.INGRESS-EGRESS. In addition and as part of this lease agreement, Landlord grants unto Tenant an easement for ingress and egress to the leased premises on the following described real estate situated in Hennepin County, 1-tate of Minnesota, TO WIT: -----------See Exhibit "A' Legal Description Page 6 of 10 Ingress -egress rights include the entrance, parking and exit of the Tenants vehicles and work equipment over the present parking lot of the demised premises. Pedestrian traffic relates to the Tenants employees, agents, contractors and sub -contractors of the Tenant. Also includes the buried or aerial power and telephone cables required by the Tenant. This easement shall extend to any option or any extension of these lease hereof which are hereinafter agreed upon between the parties. 14. TAXES AND OTHER EXPENSES. The Tenant shall pay before delinquent all real estate taxes imposed only upon the assessed value of the tenant's owned building and/or it's contents dependent upon what tax laws may be in effect at the time of the initial term of this lease, during this lease or any extension of this lease or hereof. All special property assessments, if any, imposed by taxing authorities during the term of this lease or any extension hereof, by the taxing authority upon the Landlord and the leased premises Will be paid by the Landlord. Page 7 of 10 0 i 15.LEASE TERMINATION. The Tenant retains the right to terminate this lease at any time during the original term hereof, or any lease term extension/renewel thereof a- provided, and will so designate in writing to the Landlord of it's intent to vacate the premises. In so doing, the Tenant, responsible for the associated costs of removal, will remove it's building, footings, contents and telephony facilities, except duct systems, blacktop surfaces and quit and deliver up the said premises in as good order and condition and state of repair, reas3nable use and wearing thereof, excepted. Further, the Tenant shall retain the option to offer the Landlord for the sale of the building to the Landlord should it be deemed uneconomical by the Tenant to remove the building and its footings from the premises upon vacation. 16. BILL OF SALE: Should an agreed sale price be reached by the parties the Tenant then will convey the building by a Bill of Sale to the Landlord. The Lease payments will cease immediately to the Landlord upon the vacation by the Tenant and the Tenant and Landlord will provide each other with a recordable instrument o: Release or Quit Claim Deed to terminate the Lease and to stop further lease payments. Page 8 of 10 16.TERM EXTENSION/RENEWAL. The Landlord grants unto the Tenant the option of extending this lease for two (2) successive Fifteen (15) year periods, upon the stated rental conditions as are included in this lease agreement. In the event Tenant desires to extend the rental period for a first Fifteen (15) year period, commencing on October 1, 1999, and terminating on 30 September 2014, each party shall notify each other prior to August 1, 1999, of the lease status and pending expiration by registered and/or certified mail. If . the first option period is thus exercised by Tenant, the rental figure of _ shall be paid in advance by October 1, 1999, by Tenant to Landlord. In the event Tenant exercises the first Fifteen (15) year option, as provided herein -above, it shall then have the option to renew this lease for an additional Fifteeen (15) year period, commencing on October 1, 2014, and terminating on September 30, 2029. In the event it desires to exercise said extension, it shall give Landlord written notice thereof by registered and/or certified mail prior to August 1, 2014, and pey to Landlord the rental of for the second Fifteen (15) year period October 1, 2014 to 30 September 2029. In the event no notice is given each other prior to August 1, 2014 then all rights hereunder shall cease on October 1, 2014 except as to the'following paragraph /17. Page 9 of 10 A' 17 a a. Tenant will have the Option to enter into a Purchas Agreement to acquire anytime during the origin rem ANY extension thereof of this lease whereby th ant has the Option to purchase only that part of t emised premise from the Landlord at the then appraise ue of the leased area or for whichever is igher value at the time of sale and appraisal. The 1 option area will be only that part of the demised se where the building is situated thereon includin O1x50' square rarcel of land surroundl.ng the building adjacent to the original ingress-eggress parking The right-of-way easement shall continue in ful se. 10. CONDITIONAL USE/ZONING: This Lease of Property Agreement will become NULL AND VOID unless the Tenant is permitted to locate, construct, place facilities including a building thereon the described premise. Should local planning and zoning boards, and/or other governmental agencies, private parties and/or adjacent property owners deny the Tenant the right to place it's telephony facilities thereon the premises as described, this agreement will be cancelled and no lease payments or improvement funds -•:.11 be diapersed by the.Tenant to the Landlord and/or i•s agents. 19. VARIANCES: It is the Tenant's responsibility to file for and support all costs necessary to secure the proper govermental agency approvals to complete the project. However, the Landlord will make every effort to aid, assist and represent, if called upon, at scheduled Zoning/Planning ,neetings, Council proceedings and/or Board of Adjustments, for tax purposes, on behalf of the Tenant in order to assist, testify and aid in the completion of the Tenants objective. Page 10 of 10 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION: FAIRVIEW COVENANT CHURCH CITY OF ORONO, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA THAT PART OF LOT 7 PARCEL #07-117-23-23-0007 Metes and Bounds Descriptions COM AT A PT DIS 2224 4&10 FT SLY FROM THE N LINE OF SEC ALONG A LINE RUNNING FROM A PT IN THE N LINE THEREOF DIS 402 5&10 FT E FROM THE NW CORNER THEREOF TO A PT IN THE S LINE OF NW 1/4 DIS 396 5&10 FT E FROM THE SW COR THEREOF TH SLY ALONG SAID LINE TO N LINE OF BERGQUIST AND WICKLUNDS ADDN TO BERGQUIST AD WICKLUNDS PARR HENN CO MINN TH WLY ALONG SAME AND ALONG THE H LINE OF BERGQUIST AND WICKLUNDS PARK HENN CO MINN TO W LINE OF SEC TH N ALONG SAID SEC TO A PT IN A LINE RUNNING W PAR WITH N LINE OF SEC FROM PT OF BEG TH E TU BEG EX ROAD. LEGAL SURVEY TO GOVERN AND UPON ACTUAL PLACEMENT OF BUILDING FACILITY AGREED TO BY THE LANDLORD, TENANT AND APP,%OPRIATE GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES. EXHIBIT "C" FAIRVIEW COVENANT CHURCH PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT ALSO, in exchange for the lease/easement agreement it is hereby further agreed the Tenant, at it's sole expense, will iprove and expand the existing gravel parking lot owned by a ,4 Landlord with the following items of improvements. EACH ITEM HAS AN EXPENDITURE LIMIT NOT TO EXCEED THE LISTED EXPENDITURES SHOULD THE LANDLORD WANT TO ADD TO THE PLAYGOUND AND PARFING LOT AREAS. ALL SUBSEQUENT MAINTENANCE TO ALL IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE PERFORMED AND PAID BY THE LANDLORD. ITEMS FOR IMPROVEMENT NOT TO EXCEED il. Blacktop the existing graveled parking lot (except the encroachment into Lot 6) or an area to be selected by the Landlord i2. Tree Stump Removal !3. Install 6'H x 751L of Chain Link Fence x$14 along CoRd /19 Right -of -Way for Sa'ety /4. Basketball Standard W16" well -casing and backboard w/regulation hoop #5. Misc labor and material Total il. Quote received from Dawson Blacktopping of Excelsior. Includes removal and replacement of 8" material, if required, Y2" finish surface. #4 : • . Quote received from. Hecksel Machine Shop of Watertown to build standard using 6" well casing, 4' Right angle protrusion, 10' regulation height OTHER STIPULATIONS/AGREEMENTS fl. It :will be the responsibility of the Landlord to secure an agreement and/or easement from the owners of adjacent Lot 6, Berquist & Wicklund's Addition. The Owner of record for parcel :PIt07-117-23-32-0013, appears to be: CLINT GABELS, AMERICAN BUILDERS & ASSOCIATION, INC 3600 SHORELINE DRIVE, WAYZATA, (NAVARRE), MN 55391 W# 612-471-7035 R1 612-472-6196 OR STATE OF MINNESOTA, TAX FORFEITURE, LAND DEPARTMENT FAIRVIEW COVENANT CHURCH 1175 CO RD #19 MOUND, (MINNISTRISTA) MN Drafted by: Contel of BY: Minnesota, Inc., BY: TENANT CONTEL OF MINNESOTA, INC., BY: D.L. Morton, Vice President BY: STATE OF ) COUNTY ) On this day of , A.D. , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared _ and and to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn, did sal that they executed the within and *foregoing iriatrument, to be the voluntary act and deed and by them voluntarily executed with the approval of Notary Public -State of , County of Acknowledgement Page 10 '' STATE OF Minnesota) ) SS: HENNEPIN COUNTY) On this day of , A.D. 1989, before me, the undersigned , a Notary Public 5- and for said County and State, personally appeared D.L. Murton and to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the Vice President and , respectively, of said corporation executing the within and foregoing instrument, that the seal affixed thereto is the seal of said corporation; that said instrument was signed and sealed on behalf of said corporation by authority of its Hoard of Directors; and that the said D.L. Morton and , as such officers, acknowledged the execution of said instrument to be the voluntary act and deed of said corporation, by it and by them voluntarily executed. Milton E. Seeman Notary Public -State of Minnesota County of Hennepin Ackncwledgement Page COUNCIL MEETING To: Mayor Grabelc & Orono Council Members NOV 13 1989 City Administrator Bernhardson [[;; YY ((�� ((��RR�� F ow: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoni�i�TAdl♦f�n!'�LNPor Date: November 9, 1989 Subjects #1468 George Pillsbury, 1300 Bracketts Point Road - variance/Conditional Use Permit - Resolution Zoning District - LR-11., Single family lakeshore resi,:,?�ntial, 2 acre, unsewered Application - Request for hardcover, setback and average lakeshore setback variances and conditional use permit for addition and minor grading in lakeshore yard. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Planning Commission Minutes of 10/16/89 Exhibit B - Notice of Plarning Commission Action of 10/20/89 Exhibit C - Memo & Exhibits of 10/12/b9 Exhibit D - Draft Resolution Discussion - Please review the memo and exhibits of October 12, 1989. Briefly, the applicants are -equesting a hardcover and setback variance to construct a greenhouse addition :o the existing residence. The existing residence is partiall} within the 0-75' zone. Per Exhibit H, applicant indicates that, contrary to staf f's iaeasurement on the small scale survey, the proposed addition will be no closer to the lake than portions of the existing house. Hardcover in the 0-75' zone is proposed to increase from 5.7% to 7.6%. No hardcover removals are proposed. In conjunction with the greenhouse addition, ap.licant proposes to construct a 24"-30" retaining wall r.t the top if the bank adjacent to the house (see Exhibit H). Also, applicant proposes to construct a draintile between the hf.uRe and the lakeshore bank to transport surface run-off from the 0-75' zone to a wet well in the 75-250' lone, which would ultimately discharge over land in the 75-250' zone. The Planning Commission, at their October Ifth meeting, recommended approval of the hardcover and setback variances and conditional use permit for grading, on a vote of 5-2. In their minority opinion, Planning Commissioners Kelley and Cohen indicated that they felt thatt there was no hardship nor justification shown for the increase in hardcover and structure in the 0-75' zone. Ccmmen*s from the Planning Commissioners recommending approval indicated that the relatively low percentage of hardcover in the 0-75' zone coutled with the fairly insignificant visual impact from the lake, were positive aspects of the request, as was the intent to direct drainage a,ray from the shoreline. zoning File #1468 November 9, 1989 Page 2 of 2 Planniriq Commission also directed applicant to work with staff to Pstablish limits on the grading work proposed, and applicant was advised to contact staff to arrange a meeting with the City Engineer. As of this ..r4ting, applicant has not contacted us, but the City Engineer has advised staff that additional detail of the proposed graO4 %g would be needed before a permit could be issued for the grading, if Council choosers to approve the request. The engineer h,s indicated that the pro:osal is conceptually coceptable from a technical standpoint. Also note that ';.re..e is a need for an average la�eshcre setback variance for the proposed addition. All neighboring residences are so distant that the addition will not Encroach on any existing lake views enjoyed by neighboring property owners. Staff Recommendation - Staff recommends approval of the average lakeshore setback variance and the conditional use permit for regrading and retaining i1 construction per the conceptual plan. Such approval should be subject to final detailed plan approval by the City Engineer before a grading permit is issued. Regarding the Lakeshore setback and hardcover variance, staff dce3 ^ot necessarily disaccree with the maj r'ty Planning Commission recommendation, but would note to Counc - I that past approvals of new structure in the 0-75' lone have ir1 most cases been tied to removal of equivalent amounts of bardcover in the 0- 75' zone, resulting in no hardcover increase 1'- the zone. Also, additions in the 0-75' zone normally have not been allowed to extend closer to the shoreline han the existing residence. In this case, applicant has indicated that the addition will be 58.5' from the shoreline with or Lions of the house already 57' from the shoreline. Council should consider whether the proposed drainage system to direct run-off from the 0-75' zone to the 75-250' zone is justification to grant a hardcover increase. Phis would seem tc. he breaking new ground, ann would be an apparent departure from past Council policy. A draft resolution reflecting the Planning Commission recommendation is attached for Council review. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 16, 1989 ZONING FILE #1466-KOKESH CONTINUED Gaffron said that in order to construct the 14' x 16' porch a front setback variance will be required and a side setback variance will be necessary for the construction of the deck. Ms. Roberta Schmidt, 3980 Watertown Road, said that Mr. Kokesh's house was in a state of disrepair when he purchased it. Since t'�at time, he has greatly improved the house and she felt that the porch would be a nice addition. There were no further comments from tno public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. Planning Commissioner Frown inquired as to the owner of the property to the north? Chairman Kelley answered that the property is owned by Mr. Kokesh's father ind was pasture area. Planning Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Kokesh if he had considered purchasing land from his father? Mr. Kokesh responded that it was not financially possible at this time. He said that the house was eery small and would probably be torn down at such time that he purchased land from his father. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Bellows, seconded by Planning Commissioner Brown, to recommend approval of the front and aide setback variances to construct a porch and open deck. Chairman Kelley questioned whether Bellows wished to include in her motion a condition disall,)-ing enclosure of the de.:, ;it a future time. Bellows amended her motion to include that approval is conditioned upon the deck remaining a deck only and may not be improved at any time in the future, Brown seconded. Motion, Ayes=7, Nays=0, Motion pas:_'. #1468 GEORGB PILLSBURY 1300 BRACKETT'S POINT ROAD VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 8:25 P.M. TO 8:40 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. Thomas Meyer and Mr. Herb Baldwin were presen' representing the applicants. Aasistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron stzted that the Pillsburys wished to put a greenhouse addition on their existing residence located less than 75' from the lake. Gaffron said that the existing hardcover located within the 0-75' setback zone would increase to 7.61. Gaffron further explained that the applicants were also proposing to put some kind of drain tile in the 0-75' setback that would lead back to the 75-250' zone to a wet well. 1q MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 16, 1989 ZONING FILE /1468-PILLSBURY CONTINUED Planning Commissioner Brown questioned whether the City Engineer had reviewed the drainage concept being proposed? Gaffron repi.-led that the City Engineer had only conceptually approved of the )lan, but had not received the plans in time to fully review ther.. Planning Commissioner Bellows said that the drainage and addition are really two separate issues. Planning Commissioner Johnson asked whether the sketch plan showed existing or proposed plantingE? Mr. Baldwin explained that he was going to try to preserve the desireable plants on the bank and then supplement them with more plantings that would help prevent erosion. Chairman Kelley asked what is the hardship for the variance in this case? Mr. Baldwin said that it was the applicant's intention to have a plant room that has the kind of sun orientation necessary. In the process of constructing the addition, they will address the problems with the existing grades and drainage on the property. Mr. Meyer explained the scheme of the existing house in relation to the need to locate the greenhouse as proposed. Planning Commissioner Bellows said that she understood that the greenhouse would be used for growing orchids. She said that an orchid house is more sensitive than a regular greenhouse. Sh-, said that the orchids need a more southeast orientation rather than south or southwest. Planning Commissioner Hanson suggested that the greenhouse addition be shorter so that it would rot extend toward the lake to the degree now proposed. There were no comments from the public regarding th-J- matter and the public hearing was closed. Planning Commissioner Johnson said that he did not have a problem with the hardcover, even though it is in the 0-75' setback zone, due in part because the slope to the lake is so steep that any runoff goes directly to the lake. He questioned whether a grading plan had been sul-mitted7 Mr. Baldwin said that he wculd work with staff to establish limitations for the amount of grading that the City will allow. Planning Commissioner Brown Poted that there would be a new 2 foot retaining wall. He informea Mr. Baldwin that the City is sensitive of the visual aspect of retaining walls and that 11 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION METING OCTOBER 16, 1989 ZONING FILE #1468-PILLSBURY CONTINUED screening is usually required. Mr. Baldwin said that plantings would be placed in front for screening. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing wis closed. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Planning Commissioner Bellows, to recommend approval of the hardcover variance, average lakeshore setback variance to construct an addition and a conditional use permit for ninor grading in the lakeshore yard, conditioned on the applicants working with City staff to establish grading limits. Chairman Kelley inquired as to what direction water running off of the roof of the addition will go? Mr. Meyer said that a drain spout will be installed that will direct drainage west. Motion, Ayes=5, Cohen, Kelley, Nay, due to their opinion that there is not a sufficient hardship to warrant encroachment of the 0-75' setback zone. #1469 CITY OF ORONO RIGHT-OF-WAY OF WINDJAiMR LANE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 8:53 P.M. TO 8:58 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certifi,-:ate of Mailing were duly noted. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that the City wished to install a civil defense siren within the right-of-way near 835 windjammer Lane. Lieutenant Cheswick informed the Planning Commission of the locations of sirens throughout the City. He said that Minnetonka Beach is considezing the installation of a siren in thei. area. The windjammer Lane location was selected in order to provide protection for the northwestern area of Orono. He said that there is currently no siren in that area. Mr. Chuck Bidwell indicated that he did not object to the noise impact, but was concerned about the visual impact. Planning Commissioner Bellows questioned whether there were alternate locati-ns for the siren? Mr. Bidwell said that it was his understarling that other sites were considered, but the Windjammer Lane site was selected. He said that the Police Chief had suggested placing the siren on the Lakeview Golf Course. Cheswick indicated that the owner of the Golf Course had indicated that he did not want the structure on his property. Chairman Kelley indicated that he would rather locate the 12 ZONING FILE NO. 1468 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 10/20/89 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Thomas Meyer COPIES TO: George Pillsbury Meyer, Scherers, Rockcastle Arch. 1300 Bracketts Pt Rd 325 Second Ave N Wayzata, MN 55391 Minneapolis, MN 55401 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance/Conditional Use Permit ----------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: 10/16/89 VOTE: 5 For 2 Against Planning Commission recomm:nds the following: Approval subject to conditions noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Motion was to recommend approval of hardcov --r variance, lakeshore setback and average lakeshore setback variances, and conditional use permit for additior.9 and grating work (land alterations) in 0-75' zone, conditioned u., drainage re-routing as proposed, and conditioned fin applicant working with staff to establish suitaLle limits of grading prior to council review. Minority Opinion (Cohen, Kelley): "No justification for encroachment, no hardship shown." Please arrange to meet with staff and the City Engineer to review your grading plans. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council Monday, November 13, 1989; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. if you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. 0 TO: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members Manning Commission Chairman Kelley Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE: 0 tober 12, 1989 SUBJ: #1468 George Pillsbury, 1300 Bracketts Point Road Variance/Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-lA, Single Family :akeshore Residential, 2 Acre, Unsewered Application - Request for hardcover and setback variances and conditional use permit for addition and minor grading in lakeshore yard. List of Exhibits - A - Application B - Property Owners Letter of Request 10/2/89 C - Architect's Letter of Explanation 9/28/89 D - Plat Map E - Property Owners List F - Hardcover Calculations G - Survey with Topographv H - Site Plan I - Greenhouse Plan View J - Greenhouse Elevation View --IK - Proposed Grading Plan L - Cross Section View Pfforo C."PH S Pertinent Facts - 1. The applicants are requesting 0-75' hardcover and lakeshore setback variances to construct an attached greenhouse to the existing residence. Portions of the existing residence and most of the proposed greenhouse are located in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone. The existing residence is approximately 57' from the shoreline. The proposed greenhouse will be approximately 55' from the shoreline at its closest point. 2. Har ever existing and proposed on the property is as follow: area: 0- 75' = 25,925 s.f. 75-250' = 62,900 s.f. 250-500' - 40,000 s.f. 128,825 s.f. = 2.96 AC I've Got It Under Control? A PARENT'S GUIDE TO THE FIRST STEP JUDITH STROM Deacvr-- %s .'Tess I've Got It Under Control? A PARENT'S GUIDE TO THE FIRST STEP 1) JUDITH STROM aw On my seeing this, attempt at Control #2 was to tell Joe to Ic :ve. Attempt at Control #3 was to demand my son tell me wh.wt was in the footlocker. He replied," We were just playing around.' Attempt at Control #4 was for me to suggest, 'The police station is only a block away. I'll bet Officer Cheswick has a bolt cutter that could snap right through the padlock. Let's ask him to help." Attempt at Control # 5 was to phone Officer Cheswick, whereupon my son breezed out the door and off down the street. My confusion about the real meanings of power and control led to the following scene. I'm standing in the front yard of my home, surrounded by neglected gardens. The plumber's wrench and screwdriver are now in my hands. The police are on the way. My son is whistling down the street with my words ringing in the air, "Young man, you are no longer in charge around here. I'm taking control!" I had gone home early to relax; yet I stood in the midst of absolute chaos, proclaimir. ; myself to be in control. I had lost control of my serenity, choices, afternoon and garden. At that moment, I was completely controlled by chemical dependency. Fixing the Problem? Once a parent comes to the realization that drugs or alcohol create problems for the child, the parent who cares will seek help. This usually involves treatment for the child in a program that specializes in chemical dependency. Too often, the parent regards this treatment in this way: it will "fix" the problem in the same manner that antibiotics fix an ear infection. This is no, the case. Nobody knows the cause of adolescent drug dependency nor does anyone know the cure. Treatment will offer the adolescent time away from drugs/alcohol and :he tools to heal. Treatment will also offer these tools to the family. Families also need to heal. Most programs strive to involve the entire family in treat- ment. Not because the family "cause6" the drug abuse, but because the family has been affected by the drug abuse and its ac- companying behavioral and emotional turmoil. Parents will be involved in lectures, groups, and other meetings at the treatment program. They will also be advised to seek outside support through 12-Step groups such as Alanon, Families Anonymous or Adult Children of Alcoholics. It is often difficult for parents to see the value of attending 12- Step groups. The initial (and very normal) response is, "Why do I have to attend those meetings? My child has been using drugs, not me!" further confusion occurs when the parents attend the first meeting and hear people talk about "letting go," "detach- ment," or being "powerless" over the user. These are difficult concepts for pa: ents. After all, we are responsible for controlling our children's behavior, aren't we? "Kindly let me help you or you will drown," said the monkey, placing the fish safely in a tree. Responsible FFIr or Responsible To? In treatment and in 12-Step support groups, a parent will begin to differentiate between responsibilities to adolescents versus those things for which they are responsible. Parents have responsibilities, huge responsibilities! When a child is born, a parent first realizes the awesome responsibilities for the child's very survival. Parents are responsible for fulfilling every need of the infant simply because of the helplessness of the infant. Fairly soon. the toddler begins to say "I can do it my�if." Soon the child becomes autonomous and struggles to be independent. At this point, the parent is responsible for training the child to be aware of danger, to look both ways, and to avoid touching hot stoves. But what happens when the hot stove becomes a hot car or a lit joint? Are parents responsible for that? No, this behavior is 'he choice of the adolescent. But we are responsible SQ our adolescents at this point, to assess the problem, provide assis- tanco, or hold them accountable for these choices. As parents, we tend to maintain our sense of responsibility "for" l-)ng after the -purpose of fostering growth, We hold ourselves responsible for these behaviors of the adolescent and question ourselves with, "Where did I go wrong?" The parent begins to feel likea failure and develops an overwhelming sense of inadequacy. This can lead to overcompensation through control and rigidity, or giving in to inadequacy by rolling over and playing dead, which can lead to enabling the drug user's behavior to continue. Sometimes the parent has earned the right to feel like a failure. Perhaps drug or alcohol abuse has also been a problem for the parent, with accompanying neglect or abusive behavior. Per- haps physical, emotional, or sexual abuse has o4,curred. In these cases, it is even more difficult for a paren, to separate responsibilities to and fQr. Certainly, the parent's behavior has been harmful; and, tda great extent, this parent is responsible for the adolescent's turmoil, but not the behavior! There comes a time when adolescents need to make their own choices. They can continue to blame their parents or to assume the responsibility for their own choices and exercise the power to change. "these parents have a great responsibility to the adolescent; to see that help is received in making these choices. The parent who assumes responsibility for the adolescent's drug abuse enables the adolescent to form a system of alibis and excuses for the drug -taking behavior. This parent sends a mes- sage to the adolescent that reads, "No wonder you are using drugs, you've had such a rough life." Or the reverse, "No wonder you are using drugs, I've given you too much and spoiled you rotten." Such a young person may be able to compile a long list of "reasons why" that all avoid the essential truth of, "The reason why I uce drugs is because 1 like thee».' A parent who has felt and acted as ;f he or she was responsible for the adolescent's drug problem will often be prone to assume responsibility for continuing recovery after treatment. This parent will be tempted to follow the adolescent out into the world, making sure he or she is doing what should be done for proper recovery. The adolescent in this situation can easily re'::.y,iish responsibility for resumption of drug use. Adolescents make choices and so do parents. An adolescent can choose to use drugs or not. An adolescent can choose to blame others or not. And an adolescent can ch, lose to recover or not. Parents can choose to assume responsibility 1v or for. A parent is responsible 4o the adolescent to give love, honesty, food, clothing, safety within the home, limits within which one can grow, and a healthy role model. An adolescent chooses % hat to do with these things and has respons:bility for those choices. 6 "We admitted we were powerless?" Power and powerlessness One of the most baffling concepts for parents is that of pow- erlessness. A parent's initial reaction to the First Step, "We admitted we were powerless over alcohol (plus drugs and other people's behavior) and that our lives had become unmanage- able," is to exclaim, "I can't do that. I'd have to abdicate my role as a parent. It sounds like I'm expected to give in and give up!" It means no such thing. In order to recover, the chemically dependent person will h7•: a to Rake the same First Step. It i- helpful to use experience asa guide. We often hears chemical abuser claim to havecontrol of drug use, "I can quit anytime I want to, I just don't want to now." An alcoholic will attempt to control consumption with a set of rules to govern the time and amount of the drug that can become the ruling factors of daily life: only in the aft rnoov, only with fats to coat the stomach, never around the home, never during the workday, only one drink per hour. After taking the First Step, admiring to powerlessness and unmanageability, this person may be .:ale to admit that he or she has slept till noon, gained weight, ignored the family, watched the clock, and made that one drink in an 18 ounce glass. Without the first st,!p, the alcoholic fails to see that alcohol is running the show and making the decisions. Even when "on the wagon," a chemically dependent person without a grasp on the First Step can continue to obsess on the drug. ("I haven't used anything for two months, six days, and three hours. In fact, it's no longer important to me.") Such is the typical comment of a drug abuser who hasn't surrendered to the powerlessness shaken of in the First Step. Alcoholics and drur abusers don't have a corner on this warped conception of l%)wer As a culture, we have been taught that we do and should have power and control over just about everything: our environment, employees, economy, illness, children, etc. The perception that we had learned to "control the atom" signalled the beginning of the Nuclear Age. It can he argued that we sire now controlled by the very this g that we sought to control. Much thf same occurs within the family when a member is abusing drugs or alcohol. Parents of a drug -abusing adolescent are akin to seismologists in California; counting, measuring and monitoring in hopes of gaining the upper hand on an earth- quake. Urine tests, for example, become the parent's Richter scale, and yield similar results. They confirm the event and leave you shaken. However, a urine test doesn't give anyone power over a chemically dependent person's urge to use drugs. Parents can become as obsessed with drugs as the drug abuser -- smelling the breath, checking the eyes, confirming the whereabouts, searching the room, and monitoring the phone calls of the user. Under the illusion that these measures will give them power over drug use, the rgents fail to see that drugs are controlling their lives and making many of their choices. A parent may find it helphil to examine the Second Step to fully realize the meaning of the first. The Second Step of the 12- Step Prc.gram is ("Came to believe that a power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity.") A parent can easily rebut the implications in this step with, "I'm not the one who has been acting insane, that's the drug user!" Take a moment to examine su.ne of your behavior in attempt- ing to control the adolescent's dnig habit. You may discover be- haviors that are, at the very least, inane, if not outright "insane." i . Flushing drugs or alcohol down the toilet. This controls water pressure, not chemical dependency. 2. Staying awake until 3:00 a.m. to smell the user's breath when he or she comes home. This controls your sleep, not chemical de- pendency. 3. Eavesdropping on suspicious phone calls. This controls your own sense of integrity, not chemical dependency. 4. Skipping work to try and catch him or hei skipping school. Enough said! 8 4 It has proven helpful for chemically dependent or alcoholic people t a write down the harmful consequences of use to gain awareness and admit the problem. Parents will find it equally helpful to write down the consequences of living with and at- tempting control a drug/alcohol abuser: 1. List your efforts to bribe, limit, bargain, threaten, placate and manipulate the drug user. "And our lives ' tad become unmanageable? " 11. List the changes you have made in your personal life -- vacations, social life and job, for example --in order to keep watch over the drug abuser. 12 111. List your efforts to "fix" the drug abuser and control hi_e/her environment, such as by restricting friends, changing schools, moving, counseling and controlling his/her appearance. IV. Now much ' nergy do you spend giving attention to . Is your emo►iondl well-being largely tied to the behavior and thedruguser',. t greaterorless than the time you spent attitude of the drug abuser? Write about the presence of these with him/her tom,_ iset of drug abuse? feelings in your life: 1. Anger 2. Resentment ?. pelf -pity d Guilt car ,, . ol'ollit , VI. Write about the effect on your relationsh,ps with other family members. Have you been blaming, ignoring, withholding information from or arguing with your immediate or extended family because of the drug user's behavior? VII. Has your job been affected? Time off for school or court appearances? Phone calls at work about the user's behavior? Loss of concentration and inability to cope with stress? I 17 VIII. Make a list of your own "reasons why" your child has been using drugs or acting out. K IX. List the number of crises in the past two years. Has your life become crisis oriented? Q' X. Compare this with the way you want to live. Writing these things down helps us to see what we can and cannot control. Then we can begin to make choices. Some parents may choose to change the things they can. Changes like this are very difficult to make on our own. One choice we have is to seek the support of others who are struggling or have struggled with these same choices and changes. 20 21 About the Author Judith Strom has worked in .Jolescent chemical dependency treatment since the inceptic n of the Fairview Deaconess Pro- gram in 1975. She worked in evaluation, detox, inpati• + outpatient and aftercare. Currently, she holds the title c: Senior Counselor in the Family Program. A recovering alco,.,,ji. herself, Strom has raised five children to functional adulthood -- three of those children experienced drug abuse as adolescents. Now Strom raises perennials at her home in South Minneapolis. If you would like information about Deaconess Press, please write to us at: Deaconess Press Riverside Medical Center Riverside at 25th Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454 USA COUNCIL MEETING NOV 13 1989 CITY OF ORONO I LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRIrC-� NEWS RELEASE , �V (' October 27, 1989 Contact e Strommen Dir. 473-70IJ, SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment Worksheet Undertaken Minnetonka Boat Works Orono Dock Expansion on Lake Minnetonka----1 An Environmental Assessment Worksheet has been prepared by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District according to the rules of the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board Environmental Review Program. The EAW presents an analysis of circumstances surrounding an application for a dock expansion for Minnetonka Boat Works, Orono, on Lake Minnetonka. Minnetonka Boat Works owns property in the City of Orono. It has frontage on Brown's Bay and Tanager Lake. The owner seeks to expand its facilities from 41 to 47 boat storage units on P-nwn's Bay, and from 25 to 67 boat storage units on Tanager Lake - The applicant's property has 3,31I1 feet of lake frontage, including a breakwater. The proposed expansion woulc provide one slip per 29 feet of lake frontage including the breakwater. TI-ere would be one slip per 19 feet of lake frontage not including the breakwater. The proposal is well w,thin the maximum dUnsit:y of one slip per 1.0 feet of frontage allowed under LMCD Code Section 2.05• The Environmental Assessment Worksheet can be reviewed at the LMCD offices, 402 East Lake St., Wayzata, or at the Legislative Reference Library, 64j --,�ate Office Building, St, Paul, or the Environmental Conseriatien Library, 300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis - Written public comments are to be directed to the executive director - Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, 402 E. Lake St., Wayzata MN 55391• The comment period deadline is Monday, December 11 E.R. • (Riled In by EQ81 5/1/84 L Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) MARK APPROPRIATE BOX: 0 REGULAR EAW ❑ SCOPING EAW NOTE TO REVIEWERS: For regular EAWs, written comments should address the accuracy and completeness of the EAW Information. potential Impacts that may warrant Investigation and/or the need for an EIS. For scoping EAW9, written com- ments should address the accuracy and completeness of the information and suggest Issues for Investigation In the EIS. Such comments must be submitted to the Responsible Government Unit (RGU) during the 30-day period following notice of the EAW's availability In the EQ8 Monitor. Contact the EQB (metro: 612/296.8253: non -metro: 1.800.652.9747. ask for envl- ronmental review program) or the RGU to find out when the 30-day comment period ends. 1. 2. 4. Project Name Brown's Bay & Tanager Lake Expansion Proposer Minnetonka Boat Works Contact Person Seth Whittaker .Address Phone _ 3 . RGU Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Contact Person Eugene R. Strommen and Title Executive Director 402 E. Lake Street Address Wayzata, MN 55391 Phone 473-7033 r 11 117 23 Project Location: N i 1/4 1/e Section Township Range Hennepin Orono a. County Name City/Township Name - 294 E. Grove Lane Wayzata, MN,55391 473-7305 b. Attach copies of each of the following to the EAW: 1. a county map showing the general area of the project. 2. a copylies) of USGS 7' /2 minute, 1:24.000 scale map. 3. a site plan showing the location of significant featu,es such as proposed structures, roads, extent of flood plain, wetlands, wells, etc. 4. an existing land use map and a zoning map of the Immediate area, If available. 5. Describe the proposed project completely (attach additional sheets as necessary). Minnetonka Boat Works owns property in the City of Orono having frontage on Brown's Bay and Tanager Lake. The owner seeks to expand its facilities from 41 to 47 boat storage units (BSU) on Brown's Bay, and from 25 to 67 BSU's on Tanager Lake. The property has 3,310 feet of frontage, including a breakwater. Counting the frontage of the breakwater, the proposed facility would provide one slip per 29 feet of frontage. Without the breakwater frontage there would be one slip per 19 feet of frontage. In n!ither case, the proposal is well within the maximum density allowed under LMCD Code, Section 2.05. 1 6. Reason for EAW preparation: Mandatory per 4410.4300 MEQB Review Provt , List all mandatory category rule''s which apply: Subp. 25 ' $150,000 . Estimated construction cost 8. Total project area (acres) 9 acres or length (miles) 9. Number of residential units n/a or commercial. Industrial. or Institutional square footage 10o Number of proposed parking spaces 68 spaces (includes existing space of 42) 11 • List all known local. state and federal permits/ approvals/ fuitding required: Level of Government Type of Application Status Federal: State: DNR Dock license amendment Pending EAW approval Local: LMCD Special Density & Dock licenses Approved A City of Orono Building Permit Pending installation 1 2 e Is the proposed project Inconsistent with the local adopted comp ehensive land use plan or any other adopted plans? IAI No ❑ 'fes If yes, explain: 13. Describe current and recent past land use and development on and near the site. Marina and marine related services — 40+ years Property adjacent to the north is occupied b,7 Windward Marine, engaging in retail boat sales, leasing of slips and mi 'ne repair on Tanager Lake and Brown's Bay. :he property to the south is a chann. ,.1ro--ding access from Brown's Bay to Tanager Lake. Residential property abutts the channel on the south side. 14 • Approximately how many acres of the site are In each of the following categories? (Acreages should add up to total project area belere and after construction.) Before After Before Alter Forest/Wooded Wetland (types 3.8) Cropland _ Impervious Surface Brush/grassland Other (specify) _ • 9 --azres of water surface 15. Describe the soils on the site, giving the SCS soil classilicaiinn types, if known. n/a 16. Does the site contain peat soils, highly erodible soils. steep slopes, sinkholes, shallow limestone formations, abandoned wells. or any geologic hatards? If yes, show on site Map and explain: n/I ❑ No ❑ Yes 17. What is the approximate depth lin Ivvtt lip n/a 2 OtuNHlltrtllMr ��ttlll:.,�a• y h hedrock rain -- - at q C. Noise - the be minimal and minimal turbance of 1 8o Does any part of the project area Involve:1771 a. shoreland zoning district? No Tres b. delineated 100•year flood plain? No X Yes c. slate or federally designated river land use district? No Yes If yes, Identify water body and applicable state classlllca(lon(s), and describe measures to protect water and related land resources: a. Marina is in a lake classified by the 1.1N DNR as a General Recreation, fully developed lake. b. Dock use a, oach crosses flood plain, 929.4 to 931.5, to reach the lake. 'here '.s n9 s� it� fglopee3sto avlfldn, fill, stream diversion) of any 19. Descri a any t fiysica aft, ota Ion e..., drainage system, lake, stream, and/or wetland. Describe measures to minimize Im- pairment of the water -related resources. Estimate quantity of material to be dredged and Indicate where spoils will be deposited. All measures will be taken during construction to keep the lake surface free of debris and construction materials. No alterations or dredging of the lake bottom is planned. Docks are of floating nature with poles to anchor docks where necessary. 20. a.Wlll the project require an appropriation of ground or surface water? If yes, explain (indicate quantity and source): b.Wlll the project affect groundwater levels in any wells (on or oil the site)? If yes. ex- plain: 1-21. Describe the erosion and sedimentation cont•ol measures to be used during and after construction of the project. None expected or regiired. ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes 22. a. Will the project generate X No Yes 1. surface and stormwaler runoff? No Yes 2. sanitary wastewater) No Yes 3. Industrlal wastewaler? No Yes 4. cooling water (contact and noncontact►-) If ves. Identify sources, volumes, quality (If other than normal domestic sewage), and treatment methods. Give the basis or methodology of estimates. b. Identify receiving waters, Including groundwater, and evaluate the Impacts of the discharges listed above. If discharges to groundwater are anticipated. provide per* colation/permeablllty and other hydrogeological test data. If available. 23. Will the prnjec' generate (ei(her during or alter construction) a. aoi;,ttlo!t? b dust? c. noise? d. odors? If yes. explain. Including as appropriate distances to sensitive land uses: expected lev- els and duration of noise: types and quantities of air pollutants from stacks. mobile sources, and fugitive emissions Idusts: odur sources: and rniligative measures for any Impacts. Give the basis or methedulugv ul estimates. docks will be installed during the winter months. Noise will as docks are preconstructed. Only anchor poles will be driven hardware work performed. Project not expected to be a dis- any conseq,tence. No Yes No N Yes 5 No Yes No Yes 3 24. Describe the type and amount of solid and/or hazardous wrste Including sludges and ashes that will be generated and the method and location of disposal: None 25. Will the project affect: ❑ No ® Yes a. fish or wildlife habitat, or movement of animals? that are officially listed as state endangered, threatened, or of a ❑ b. any native species No Yes special concern (animals and/or plants)? If yes, explain (Identify species and describe Impact): a. During construction some fish may be displaced. After construction the docks will provide protective habitat for fish native to the area — bass, 2 6. crappies, sunfish Do historical, archaeological or architectural resources exist on or near the project ® No ❑ Yes any site? If yes, explain (show resotrces on a site map and describe impact," 27. Will the project cause the Impairment or destruction of: No Yes a. designated park or recreation areas? X No Yes b. prime or unique farmlands? No Yes c. ecologically sensitive areas? No X Yes d. scenic views and vistas? No Yes e. other unique resources (specify)? It yes, explain: d. Boat storage will replace an unbroken view of th_ shoreline on Tanager Lake side. This is not unusual in a genEral development, recreation water body. 28e This is viewed as consistent with the lake's recreatAbial use. Indicate the current average daily traffic IADT1. Increase in For each affected road contributed by the project and the directional distributions of traffic. The City of Orono has approved the parking plan. The increased docking of 48 boats will attract on an average high -use day 1/3 more traffic to the site. This may involve 16 additional trips to the site. The daily turn -over of site users is probably three times the average high -trip use. A 29e Are adequate utilities and public services now available to service the project? If not. ❑ Nu © Yes what additional utilities and/or services will be required? Summary of issues For regul*: EAWs, list the Issues as Identified by "yes" answers above. Discuss alternatives and mitigative measures for these Issues. For scoping EAWs. list known issues, alternatives, and mitigative measures to be addressed in EIS. a. Lessening of scenic views b. Addition of boat traffic thru a narrow channel to Tanager Lake, with possible increased waiting on/near the channel in Tanager Lake. The owner will face the four end slips so that access is opposite of normal channel traffic. c. Added boat storage density in Tanager Lake. The proposal is well within the maximum density allowed under LMCD Code Section 2.05 of one slip per 10 feet of frontage. CERTIFICATION BV RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENTAL UNIT I hereby certify ths. the information contained its this document Is true and complete to the best of my knowledge and that copies of the compiried EAW have been made a%adable to all points on the official EQB dtstttbLtion list Signatu►e&`'�44_ ( .J J< ` ` Dale S.: ; Title — 'T_ < scA E in FEET a a 0 n -------- OAS NOTES EXISTING SHORELINE 3-40 LF EXIWST DOCKS ON sup's EXISTING PARKING 42 SPACES PRO IISED OOCKS " SUPS PROPOSED PARKING Ls SPACES - - - - - - - - — ----- rCTU DOCKS 'I. Su" TOTAL PARKING " SpArgs rRoPoSPED, V,cr. AltfAA GF—MEMT PRO/SD DOCK AND PARKING LAYOUT PLAN PW ALTWIMATIE RE -BE RGOU I SIL M( Rws GRADING PLAN ZA�AT JIME'rowKA BOATWORKS IY s . - 0500) • Z r Ali . t "s 1 � R p S., Ph,p Per101 60 (1) SO O Q7 M INNcn,rK^ g?I*t k4w .9rt O'A C" l� a' .rr III 1 3 `+"% In Low Lake 2 . �•' _ J 91 `•� , `^ - CRY JIM Ve • � �i Tanager j • =_.r + - tad Lake 10 r ~ .. ; = / 1• . L J , - �� 100 f all y z //1 MPIIOYt ►Olnt 10pl It -�l ' 1�' 1° �y�•• •, '�-�S gall Il�W r olnt b- 10 1 L`• yI fix Cam/ v �• 1p lap Muntington C4 i point r '" �tiro. t 9,1n1f?� o r �l , �' � i %; C I M 40 V duRREur Dock p9,F-A46EMENr- uk z m I 'A nSr MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278 HELD ON OCTOBER 9, 1989 The regul,.; meeting of the School Board of Orono Independent School District No. 278 :gas held on Monday, October 9, 1989. Present: Dave McKown James Franklin Thomas Mich Don Anderson John Maresh William Fenholt Kitty Crosby Lucie Taylor UPON MOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by John Maresh, the consent agenda was approved as follows: - approved the minutes of the Sert, -tie; 25, 1a89 regular meeting; - approved the minutes of the Board Workshop, September 25, 1989; - approved the appointment of Lynda Meador as Chemical Health CounseloriCoordinator in accordance with federal grai,t availability; - approved the appointment of the following part-time lunchroom supervisors: Debra Roepke and Dawn Muor,ey; - approved the appointment of Edith Nelson as a part-time cook at Schumann Elementary School; - approved the appointment of Sandra Odenthal as a part-time custodian at Schumann Elementary School; - approved the following variance request: M. Aaron Bean, grade 9, to attend Wayzata Schools for the 1989-90 school year; - approved the bills as covered by vouchers 064528 through Ob4670 and 06J'f55 through 063824. Dr. Mica reported that the following three 8th grade students - Ryan Cl...d, Betsy Lawton and Wonju Kim, have been selected to participate it the Youth Talen-ed Mathematics project at the University of Minnesota and join Amy Hite and Neil Smaby who also participate in this prt.gram; that Kristen Powell, Intermediate School teacher, is a contributing rev;ewer at the Ani:.ul Book Week Program at the University of Minnesota being held Or_tob- 16 - 20, 1989; !aat congratulations are in order to Pat Headley, Honor Rrle Teacher of the yaA- nor the State of Minnesota, and that a rE.,ption will be held on Cct_ber I' f*orl 2:30 - 4:30 pon. in the high school library. Dr. Mi called on Pat Headley who provided the Board with an overview of !.ire process followed in sPlect'ng the Minnesota Teacher of the Year and shared s(„a: of her experiences from this process. On behalf of herself and the local teacher association, Pat presented a plaque to the school district from the Minnesota Education Association. D► Mich reported that tw had attended a meeting on Friday, October 6, on the equity litigation lawsuit and he provided them with an update on the progress of the lawsu' ; that he wan*ed to present each Board member with an aerial ohoto of the campus; that he wanted to invite Beard members to attend the Metro ECSU orientation meeting on October 25, 1989; that National Education Week is November 12 - 18 and plans are in process for that week; that on October 23 there wi l l be a teacher w,. kshop and Board members are invited to atte.id; that he was distributing a rough copy of the class size of K - 12 for Board infor- mation; that Steven Greenfield will be conducting the study of the guidance program for the district and will be in contact with Board members for input; that he was distributing the Superintendent evaluation form and when Board mem- bers have cimpleted them, they should return them to Kitty Crosby for com- pilation. John Maresh expressed concern regarding an article in the Sailor stating that there may be a greater drug problem in the Orono Schoo his rict than in surrounding districts and that he had heard co..cern expressed by community members. Dr. Mich responded that it i; infortunate that that statement was printed, it was not a direct quote but only -n implication on Chief Kilbo's part, and that there is not any data/evidence to support that statement. UPON MOTION by Lucie Taylor, seconded by Don Anderson, the School Board rejected the bids for new construction received on September 19, 1989 and directed the school architect to redesign and rebid the project so as to bring costs in line with available resources. Dr. Mich pruvided information on the plan that will be followed regarding the construction of the new facility. The facilities committee (Dave McKown, Lucie Taylor, Don Anderson, Bill Fenholt and Tom Micn) h;; recommended that redesign be �Wdied with elimination of items cr use of Alternative items to reduce Costs; that a construction manaqer be employed as a consultant for the purpose of assisting in the redesign, reduction of costs on alternate items/elimination of items and estimation of bids; that a new bidding date will be established; that reconmendations For housing of students for the 1990-91 school year will be developed; that an information campaign will be developed for staff, students and the community. Dr. Mich stated that the Board will be kept informed through Superintendent Advisories, updates at Board meeti,gs, Board workshops, etc. UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Jim Franklin, that, because of a change in 'he tax levy heari^y date as determined by the State Commissioner of Revenue, the previously set odte of October 23 is postponed, with the understanding that a new date sometime between mid -November and the end of December will be set at subsequent Board meeting. John Maresh MOVED and Lucie Taylor seconded that the School Board adopt the following handicapped access grievance procedure providing for a resolution of complaints that may be filed against the district for alleged violations under barriar free requirements as stipulated by the Department of Health, Education, and Weifare: Section 504 Grievance Procedure Required under Dept. of Health, Education & Welfare (84.7 Wed. May 4, 1977) The Orono I.S.D. f278 has adopted an internal grievance procedure providing for prompt and equitable resolution of complaints alleging any action prohibited by the Dept. of Health, Education 6 Welfare (84.7 Wed. May 4, 1977) imple- menting Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Section 504 states, in part, that "no otherwise qualified handicapped individuals... shall, solely by reason of his/her handicap, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any pragram or activity receiving federal financial assistance...' Complaints should be addressed to: Assistant to the Superintendent, who has been designated to coordinate Section 504 compliance efforts. 1. A complaint should be filed in writing or verbally, contain the name and address of the person filing it, and briefly describe the alleged violation of the regulations. 2. A complaint should be filed within thirty (30) days after the complainant becomes aware of the alleged violation. (Processing of allegations of discrimination occurring before this grievance procedure was in place gill be considered on a case -by -case basis.) 3. An investigation, as may be appropriate, ;hall follow a filing of a complaint. The investigation will be conducted by the Ass;,.tant to the Superintendent. These rules contemplate informal but thorough investi- gations, affording all interested persons and their representatives, if any, an opportunity to submit evidence relevant to a complaint. Under 84.7 Wed. May 4, 1988, the Assistant to the Superintendet need not process complaints from applicants for employment or from applicants for admission to post- secondary educational institutions. 4. A written determination as to the validity of the complaint and description of resolution, if any, shall be issued by the Assistant to the Superin- tendent and a copy forwarded to the complainant no later than thirty (30) days after its filing. 5. The Section 504 coordinator shall maintain the files and records of the Orono Schools relating to the complaints filed. 6. The Complainant can request a reconsideration of the case in instances where he or she is dissatisfied with the resolution. The request for recon- sideration should be made within thirty (30) days to the Superintendent of Schools. 7. The right of a person to a prompt and equitable resolution of the complaint filed hereunder shall not be impaired by the person's pursuit of other rem^ - dies such as the filing of a Section 504 complaint with the Dept. of Education. Utilization of this grievance procedure is not a prerequisite to the pursuit of other remedies. 8. These ruses should be construed to protect the substantive rights of interested persons, to meet appropriate due process standards and to assure that the Orono I.S.D. #278 complies with Section 504 and the Dept. of Education. October 9, 1989 Jim Franklin MOVED, Lucie Taylor seconded, that the motion be amended to eliminate the word "verbally" in section number 1, sentence 1. Carried unanimously. Jim Franklin MOVED, Lucie Taylor seconded, tnat the motion be amended to add the following to section number 4 - "or a statement regarding the matter with a schedule by which r decision will be rendered" pending approval by the con- sultant. Carried unanimously. Don Anderson MOVED, Jchn Maresh seconded, that this item be tabled until the October 23, 1989 meeting. Opposed: Crosby, Taylor. Motion carried. UPON MOTION by Lucie Taylor, seconded by Jim Franklin, the School Board ratified the Confidential Secretary Contract for 1989-91 as negotiated by the Board Negotiating Committee. Dave McKown stated that he had appointed Jim Franklin to serve as the Board representative in the equity lawsuit. UPON MOTION by Lucie Taylor, seconded by Don Anderson, the meeting was adjourned. Khtherine P. Crosby, Cler Approved: Dave McKown, Chairman REGII(NALTROW804d) Mears Park Centre 230 cast 5th Street St. Paul, Mtnnesoto 55101 612/292-8789 October "'0. 1989 Mark Bernhardson Administrator City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay MN 55323 Dear Mr. Bernhardson: �3l The 1989 legislature created a new Regional Transit board and cnanged the boundaries of some of the districts. I have been selected to represent District F, western Anoka and western Hennepin Counties. This is almost the same arec I represented when I served on ii e Metropolitan Transit Commission several years ago. Foy ;hose of you who don't know me, I'd like to tell you a little about my transit and loccl government experience. I have been c city employee for twenty-eight years, the last f^E-en as Director of Accounting for Coon Rapids. I also served four years on the Anoka City Council. I do believe I have a good feel for municipal government, and an understanding of the concerns of local officials on transportation issues in the metropolitan area. I served on the MTC for six years, two years as Vice Chairman, and I have served on the RTB since it was created. I alsc jerve as the RIB representative on the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB). There are many important issues facing the Regional Transit Board: improving transit in the suburban area, looking at transit financing mechanisms, continuing to improve transit for the elderly and disabled, and working with cities and counties on lighl rail transit development. Your Ideas and concerns are welcome and appreciated. I can be reached at 755-2880 or 421-1213, also at 430 Rice Street, Anoka, MN 55303. If you wood like to discuss transit issues, please call me. I will also be happy tc meet with you, or attend meetings in your community. I look forward to serving as your representative on the Regional Transit Board. Sincerely, Ruth Franklin RTB Board Member District F RF1smf �1 An Equal Opportunity Employer TO: hurt Erickson FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat jo DATE: October 4, 1989 SUBJECT: Commendation On Monday, October 2, 1989, I received a very nice phone call from Mary Butler indicating her most praise for your actions in response to her 911 call on September 30, 1989. Your effective handling of this call is most appreciated. Thanks again. cc: Chief Kilbo Personnel File Ar �•'�At'' ..:,.. }y,«' er;.✓- T .dt x�y';•¢dii+:,..awn .ay^Kf �'-a•'4 �:.4T• •.�J.-t,ytys ,.^„ .. ry :. ..�;.:•..i�:�,•.•>1/,»;(.. �:: .,t.!; r. ,ti w�>AC+'-�4!d+b.�4i,!�'j�'±.�t�: Vu w�iili VQ.t.'.�f?1t►?'J�+f�ii!IGi:Mti!!."s.�►137'�1:�{i'KY.R.•-•.ZFS.i�Gr.t u•..�1•.�l t•i:t�e:ihC:�c':r+c �s/�1.�[a6t�iAhi1'►1VJon..<<}..9m tR �y"'•sw: GEoRGr H. Dixon 3250 Fox STREET LONG LAKE MINNESOTA 33356 t . November 1, 1989 Orono Police Department 445 Willow Drive Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 This is just to thank you and Officer O'Brien for looking aftEr our home on Halloween night. Mrs. Dixon and I are very appreciative. "A=k Z44( PIHt it-fULI-G rpue,t (NC Ia(.1 ROUTING - REQUEST Please READ j❑j ! J HANDLE ❑ APPROVE and ❑ FORWARD ❑ RETURN ❑ KEEP OR DISCARD ❑ REVIEW WITH ME Date — - -- DATE: November 3, 1969 TO: Reserve Officer. Trov Denneson FROM: Chief Melvin Kilbo SUBJECT: Letter or recognition On October 28, 1989 at 1235 hours, 4400 West Arm Road, Apt. 217, on you went to a medical at Tomczyk. permission from Officer Mark As Officer Tomczyk arrived on the scene, he found to a 38 year old male patient who had requrgitatedvbloodtandlna set - by palpation. as weak. You had set up 02 and were taking his blood pressure Officer Tomczvk stated YOU were calm, had to be done in this and did what case, even ascertainingonal the victims need by calm conversation. s Officer Mark Tomczvk and I agree that this professional conduct should be recognized. Thank vou. ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT ALARM ws5 KFv cr.rR(y, NIVRF^ 'YAK Ccw' ACfS,iCA- MEDICAL RITE CJMv ^Ec •PLC yl c c� W r .•-� Z L.NfIR MR SOLAZ nQ BADGE Sfih TIME ASIG !TA;i T'ME APR ,TAR, TIME CLR ITCl. 0 ,' r ► I �— 3 L I, z 1 3 1 7 Z 7 rR;; C'V" v op q - P 60 A - AWE+ El(� �j �� E v 'OFFICER �� PRMCIPAL COOS _ r L L 1 SUSPECT SUS OCTIM vir V Vs y LW tsh UDC UCS ASS REPORT PARTY RP ADMIN ALW M Ma 5 77 F , I I I1. 6 6 OFFENDER OFF U7HE-- on. T Orw OFFENSE - OR Mi IAL COMPLAINT _ ARREST', C:'AToD,* WARS P ` AIAyE. T FwS- Wl�SJ C �' we A— 33 ti• - AOOREi H,W c I ;IG 0T•1E= REPORTS MICLUDEC PH A C� L%Jlraw Cm ST ZIP PH,R, -- P C NAME .AST FIRS; MiOO.F: 006 —TsFY ADDRESS PM W CITY 5' IP PH 14I o'ca ro PLOP r yr *,I - M1prK ;,x l Amx*- gepor OftAme Peov _ Ph" _ Tap Cory- vee Pepor Rpl Cal -, CAUSE OF ALARM TYPE OF ALARM tEAT ER COMMONS USER ERROR ❑ MiiUS04 _, AQWAL WOOD" ❑ MOLD UP MODERATE OPEN DOORWP" ❑ EIERGEMCY C SEVERE ( AW RAMS ETC) IEcmAMCI. mAp,* noh O FIRE OTHER OTTER WAFT FOR KEY4OLDEFr _ SEARCH OF §LaDMOT _ ALARM Ca — IOYMO DFA KWE IEDCAMESCUE FEE DEBT -- OT►EA _ 0 kAVY SS O OT►EA COMMENTS I1,.:, T C7 . AMCE V a * Q -- TWTEDRELEA-qD AMKAANa ARWVAL T1E Z V 1AM15PpRTW TO 2-,.j� S. ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT DAILY REPORT UNIT NO 'i10ER ATE , lEiy SHIFT b/ - /yi.' RADIO CALLS SPEEDOMETER READINGS FINISH START Z - MILEAGE - /CALL ARRIVED CLEAVED ZONE DETAIL Of POLICE OPERATIONS y Al o e _ s oil -Ile o ,4 112 / f r lti Ali . 1•4n�.. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 16, 1989 ATTENDANCE 7:00 P.M. The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the fallowing members present: Chairman Kelley and Planning Lommissioners 'ohnson, Bellows, Cohen, Brown, Eanson and Moos. The following represented the City staff: Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron, As^istant City Engineer Olson, Lieutenant Lhesaick, and City Recorder Scheffler. Council Representative PEterson was also present. #1470 DAN i RUTH PARTEN 4300 BAYSIDE ROAD PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PUBLIC HEARING 7:00 P.M. TO 7:40 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. and Mrs. Parten were present for this public hearing. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the information Pertaining to this preliminary subdivision. he said that this property was very unique and linear in configuration with the Luce Line at the north end and Bayside Road at the south end. The applicant is proposing a 3- lot subdivision with each lot approximately 5 acres in size. Gaffron explained the various issues involved with this application including the fact that Lot 3 does not abut a public or private road. Another issue is the fact that an alternate drainfield site was not found within the proposed Lot 1. Mr. Parten said that he did not think that Outlot A fit well with the interior property, but would be better suited for the property to the west. Chairman Kelley questioned whether it wouldn't be more practical to have only two lots developed, rather -han 3? Mr. Parten replied that his interpretation of the reason for the 5-acre zoning is to control density. He said tLat intention is being met both with his proposal and the development possibilities of the adjacent properties. Mr. Parten also said that the topography and ravine within the property limited the location of building sites. Chairman Kelley questioned whether the applicant had considered proceeding with a PRD? Mr. Parten said that he was sorewhat uneasy to proceed in that manner. He questioned how the commons area would be maintained. Kelley cited the French Creek development as an exampiL of a PRD and informed Mr. Parten that agreements are made as to the maintenance of the commons area. Kelley said that he had visited 1 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMI-SION MEETING (CTOBER 16, 1989 ZONING FILE #1470-PARTEN CONTINUED the site and felt that the topography was such that in order to achieve 3 lots, the app'. nt should proceed with a PRD. Planning Commissioner Brown concurred with Kelley. Planning Commissioner Hanson said that he too agreed that a PRD would be the best approach and added that it may be necessary to have only a 2-lot subdivision. Planning Commissioner Johrson asked Gaffron to explain the existing 60' road easement. Gaffron explained that the easement was granted to the Reiersgurd property. saffron said that the - ay the Zoning Code reads the 60' easement would be excluded from he area devoted to the 5-acre calculation of acreage. Planning Commissioner Bellows said that this property presented an excellent opportunity for a PRD. She said that too inany variances would be required in order to proceed in any other manner. Bellows indicated that she did not like the proposed location for the alternate drainfield site for Lot 1. Gaffron asked the Planning Commission how they would respond to a proposal locating the alternate drainfield site in Outict A if a PRD was pursued. Bellows responded that she would prefer to see the alternate drainfield site located somewhere other than across an easement. She questioned whether it could exist in one of the other outlots? Mr. Parten questioned the size of the building envelope and how the size is determined? Chairman Kelley informed Mr. Parten that such a decision would be his to make. Mr. Parten asked for direction in this reqard. Gaff _ii indicated that he would like to see the building envelop.- at a minimum of two acres. Johnson questioned the possibility of creating an access to serve adjacent properties as well. Mary Petersen expressed her concern about the creseit the Luce Line. She said that the DNR had indicated ti preference to have no crossing of the Luce Line and should t: be future development of the property in this area that Bafside Road be used for access rather than ;.he Luce Line. Mrs. Parten asked whAt the requirements wnul.0 be for the i MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 16, 1989 ZONING FILE #1470-PARTEN CONTINUED road if they proceeded with a PRD? Planning Commissioners Cohen and Hansor indicated that they would like to see the roc.d at a 50' width for the entire length. Kelly said that if the applicants proceeded with a PRD, he would like tc, see the road at a 50 foot width and that access be provided to the northeast corner. Mrs. Parten asked whether the road would be private or public? Kelley indicated that more than likely the road would he private and though the easement would be 50' in width, the road may only be constructed at a 14 or 15 foot width. Mary Petersen asked whethe+- blacktopping of the road :joule' be required? The Planning Commission replied that blacktopping would not be required due to the road having a "private" designa*ior.. Ms. Petersen questioned why it was necessary to blacktop the private road constructed within the Foxfyre Subdivision? Gaffron clarified that when a private road ser,,Ps 3 or more residences, the City has consistently required the road to be paved. • e' Mr. Parten asked it, for economical reasons • he could just divide the 2.71 and. 10 acres he currently owns and not go ahead with the purchaZe of the northerly 4.25 acre parcel from Mrs. Styles. Planning Commissioner Hanson replied that it may ve that with the easement, there would not be enough land to rre3te 2 lots. Gaffron suggested that perhaps. the Reiersgo.d easement could be reduced from 60' to 50' Chairman Kelley poinced out that if Mr. Parten proceeds with a PRD for 3 lots, the lots would all be north of the Reiersgord easement. He said that there would not be enough contiguous land to create 3 lots and the applicant would require approval for non-contiguous acreage. Kelley questioned why tho Planning Commission could not recommend approval of a 2-lot PRD with non- contigious acreage? Bellows noted that the 2-lot PRv would leave Mrs. St,fies' parcel landlocked. Chairman K.:11ey questioned whether it was reasonable to expect Mr. Parten to be responsible for the land locked parcel that currently exists as such? 3 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMIRSION FETING OCTOBER 16, 1989 ZONING FIW' #1470-PARTEN CONTINUED Planning Commissioner Hanson again questioned whether it would be possible to crate 3 lots of satisfactory characteristics. MrE . Parten suygest.ed that due to the low density in this are,- overall, that per-h%ps the grinting of a variance would not LE: L,:reasonable. Planniny Commissioner Cohen indicated that he would be willing to consider varian ie approval prop :ded that the applicant pu. :•aase Mrs. Styles ,.25 acre, and include it in the subdivision. Kelley suggested that in addition to providing access to the 4.25 parcel, that access be given to the other existing land !Dcked parcels in the northeast corner. Mr. Parten questioned whet' would be required to have a paved road? Chairman Kelley suggested that the Iomeowners current,y achieving access via the L► Line that would benefit from the construction of the road pay a share of the cost. The question ahose as to whether those residents actually Lad do easement from the DNR tc cross the Luce Li Planninq Commissioner Cohen suggested that the applicant investigate that further and bring the information `ack at a :`_er time. Chairman Kelley indica}el that he would favor a 3-lot P with access to the 4.25 acre lot and the other 2 !anelcck properties. Planning Commissions. Johnson said *-hat the iss•-Ies nncern are the location of r.nE: alternate drainfield site for 1, 1, access to the rema-r _ 'ma's and the questier, of whether a PRD is the best way tt- _ Jcatd. He said that he would re n.ore likely to a -)Ye a lot size variance. Planning Commissi. cr Cohen cony- i -c ed with Joh! son. Planning Commi:siooner Het low-- agreed with prt-fere ice. Planning Commissioner e:rown concurred with oel lows, and felt - ` - ..s imf _ 7tant to. further inve ,• eas-ement tot cross:no ` the Luce Line. Pl nine Con .ssic-o- Hanson a. C with Kel lrt- li:- Plannin; Commissioner Moo M..-'d ac tt• t she too had conQersi about the location ,-f ths.ai• erc,at, drams -field site. 1 RTC' e. •r+!..�«.• .+.•y R+•yt �� . .. .. •_ - •._'?r "'i- . �.. . ..a...�. w•y+!+�.• _ w-• � _s.p�.�!w++�.�,,"!11..: MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MrdTING OCTOBER 16, 1989 ZONING FILE #147C-PARTEN CONTINUED Johns .r :.%,'.sed the question of how the Zoning Code addressed the regr.LL%j.,i� c--atiguous land and the exclusion: or inclusion of easements for lots containing 2 and 5 acre minimums. lie r �t-�d that for 2 acre minimum, dry contiguous buildable area, easer, =rts and private dries are excluded. He asked whether that held true for 5 acre lots. Gaff ron interpreted the Code to say that 5 acre lots must have a minimum of 2 acre, dry, contiguous, buildable land not locateu within any right-of-way, or other easements. He sa:' that the Code does not specify whethe- �.he additional 3 acres are required to be contiguous. Chairman Kelley suggested that the Partens plit together a PRD and a lot size variance application. There were no further comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was continued. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Johnson, to table thi-. zpplicatior. Mot.,Lon, Ayes=7, hays-0, Motion passed. #1461 THE REVEREND PAUL W. BERG(:REN 585 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOUTH VARIANCE PUBLICS ;tEARING 7:42 P.M. TO 7:43 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Reverend Berggren was present for this application. Assistant Planning .d Zoning Administr- gaff informed the Planning Commissior: chat this applicat of the need for a side setback variance to construct a Chairman Kelley inquired as to whether pine trees to the north of the house would remain. Reverend Barggren stated that he eid not intend to remove the trees. Planning Commi sioner Brovn asked if there was any other location for the pore; addition? Reverend Berjgren said that putting the porch in another locatior would i.. with the bay window, the septic system or the d ve-ey. There we no comment the public regarding this matter and the publi, ►earinq was clo-ed. Reverend Bergqrpn said that he ha(+ talked with his neighbor on the north side and he indicated that he had no ob jecti -)ns to S MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 16, 1989 ZONING FILE #1.461-BERGGREN CONTINUED this proposal. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Brown, seconded by Planning Commissioner Hanson, to recommend approval of the 15' side setback variance, based on the hardship and findings noted in staff's memo. Motion, Ayes=7, Nays=O, Motion passed. #1462 RICHARD A. SCHMIDT OF ORCHARD PARK FARM INC. 3980 NATERTOWN ROAD VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 7:47 P.M. TO 7:48 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Ms. Roberta Schmidt was present for this matter. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that the applicants wished to put a second story on an existing house located 35' from the front lot line, where 100` is required. Chairman Kelley inquired as to how much of the existing house will need to be torn down? Ms. Schmidt replied that most of the first floor will remain as is with the exception of the rear entry way that wi 1 1 change to accomodate a stairway. Chairman Kelley asked if the foundation was sturdy enough to support a second story? Ms. Schmidt indicated that it was. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Cohen, seconded by Planning Commissioner Moos, to rec-mmend approval of the 65' front setback variance, based on the hardship and findings and conditioned upon arrangements being made and proof furnished that the septic s-stem has been replaced to ac comodate the expansion. Motion, Ayes=7, Nays=O, Motion passed. #1463 CONTEL OF MINNESOTA, INC. .'BRSECTIOM DF TONKAVIEW LANE 7 COUNTY ROAD 19 CONDITIONAL USX PERMIT/VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 7:50 P.M. TO 8:13 P.M. The Affidavit of Publicati<_.► and Certificate of `lailinq were duly ncted. Mr. Peter Brozia Mr. Milton Seeman and Mr. Wayne King were present as respesinco jes for Contel of Minnesota. Assistant Planninq and Zoning Administrator Gaffron ♦ ' ,r,7' .."!Y'ays. dam. .wR.^►Y.. a'A'%1M7..ew•: a • wy ..�... _ ".'.:s6_'r�'"'v'^•V'Rh��4P•.1"T.�O♦,.J'^.R..��,�v. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 16, 1989 ZONING FILE #1463-CONTEL OF MINNESOTA CONTINUED explained that Contel wished to construct a remote switch building. Gaffron said that Contel has provided a survey showing the location of the neighboring house in relation to the proposed site of tha switch building. The applicant is seeking approval of a 16' setback variance from the north residential lot line, and a 4' setback va-iance from the south residential lot line. Gaffron referenced a letter that the City had received from Mr. McCurdy, the neighbor to the north, requesting that screening be provided to lessen the noise and visual impact. Mr. Broziak said that there are existing trees on the s4 `'e of the proposed switch building as well as existing trees on Mr. McCurdy's property. He said that the air conditioners that would be used for the building have a maximum of 5,000 b.t.u.'s, which is comparable to an average household air conditioner. He said that only one of the two air conditioners would be operating at any given time, as one would kick in if tre other stopped. He further stated that the air conditict�::rs would only operate in the summer when there is a need to keep the machinery inside the building cool. He said that it would be no different than someone building a house and putting in a window air conditioner. Mr. Seeman distributed pictures of a completed structure that is s4•,.'=ar to the proposed structure. Plan.,�.►,g Commissioner Cohen questioned why the air conditioners could not be placed on the other side of the building? Mr. King said that due to t%he layout of the equipment inside the building, the air conditioners must be located as proposed. Planning Commissioner Brown suggested turning the building so that the air conditioners would be located on the other side. Mr. King said that would interfere with the ability to access the building and the capability to connect the building to the existing electrical cables. Planning Commissioner Bellows questioned why a building of this size could not be in a location where it would meet the setbacks? Gaffron replied that if the building was located so as to meet the setbacks, it would be out in the open without the benefit of existing screening. Chairman Kelley inquired as to the Planning Commission's recommendations for a previous, similar application? Gaffron replied that the Planning Commission had recommended approval of the N.W. Bell application for a conditional use permit. Gaffron noted 'hat the structure in that application was to be located within a residential lot with a setback of 7 .. ..y n-•,. - .,. ...,may, q..�. .�y,w... .. r,-�.�rM�:' •--.•..r•. '-r•. •r-7"I^y. _ _ ^ f r•r •.. . �� ., .w�u.v e•i. -r! P++e+.OW s MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 16, 1989 ZONING FILLS i1463-CONTEL OF MINNESOTA CONTINUED approximately 10' from the street lot line. Planning Commissioner Johnson opined that the impact of the proposed structure was fairly minimal. Kelley recollected that the Planning Commission had asked U.S. West to plant arborvitae around the structure they installed. Mr. Fred Royal, an owner of property across the street from the proposed switching building, said that he had no objections to the building being located as proposed, but he world like to have the building screened from view. Mr. Fred Abrahai on, a representative of the Fairview Covenant Church, expi,ined his dilemma involving tre need to obtain the tax forfeit parcel of land upon which the Church recreational area is located. Gaffron clarified that Lot 6 is currently being used by the Church for recreational purposes. Gaffron said that the contract between Contel and ^hurch suggests that Contel will perform some improvements on property that is currently not owned by the Church. There were no further comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It. was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Johnson, to recommend approval of the setback variances as outlined in the application, provided that appropriate screening and arborvitae be slanted along the west and south side of the building and that a landscape plan be submitted at the time of Council review. Kelley suggested that the planting requirements be similar to that recommended in the approval of the U.S. West applcation. Mr. Broziak questioned whether it was necessary to plant arborvitae? Planning Commissioner Johnson suggested that any coniferous tree could be used. Kelley amended his motion to that effect, Johnson seconded. Gaffron inquired as to whether any of the 5 condit4ons recommended in his memo where to be included in the motion, Kelley replied that he wished to include number 1, revise number 3 to require plantings on the west end south of the structure, and include number 5, Johnson seconded. Motion, Ayes=6, Cohen, Nay, due to his agreement with Mr. McCurdy, and that in his opinion there are other location alternatives. 11464 CHARLES NADLER 2509 KELLY AVENUE VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 8:13 P.M. TO 8:15 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. e -•�jr.•�+r..lr'�R+4+„'p.'•. ...nn.,,�,.�t;.+�+.. •ta....w;..-.�..�..yr... �+►.•r r.�.. :T":°w .A� • .w .+. .. �... .. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 16, 1989 ZONING PILE #1464-NADLER CONTINUED Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron informed the Planning Commission that this application involved a request for an addition requiring hardcover and average setback variances. The applicants have revised their initial proposal in such a way that hardcover will only increase .2% to 29.3% in the 75-250' zcne. Gaffron said that the applicants have agreed to remove a portion of the driveway apron and existing plastic under rockbeds, etc. Planning Commissioner Hanson questioned the -comments made regarding the "pie -shaped nature of the lot in this case has no significant impact on the allowable hardcover...". Gaffron explained that the applicants had commented that because their lot was pie -shaped that they have less area in the 75-250' zone. Gaffron said that he had looked into that theory further and determined that was not the case. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closet'. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Cohen, seconded by Manning Commissioner Hanson, to recommend approval of the average lakeshore setback variance, based on the finding that there are no significant encroachments on the existing lakeviews enjoyed by the neighbors, and further recommending approval of the hardcover variance to allow an increase of .2%, based on the removal of hardcover on the lakeside of the house. Cohen noted that this recommendation for approval was consistent with previous Planning Commission action under similar circumstances. Motion, Ayes=7, Nays=O, Motion passed. 11465 GERALD _.CCOURTNEY 1055 FERNDALE ROAD WEST VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING It was moved by Commissioner Cohen, to Nays=0, Motion passed. Chaiman Kelley, seconded by Planning table this application. Motion, Ayes=7, #1466 DAN NORESH 4040 WATERTOWN ROAD VARIANCP PUBLIC BERING 8:20 P.M. TO 8:21 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. Kokesh was present for this application. Assistant Planning and Zc;ning Administrator Gaffron explained that the applicant had recently added on to his residence and as a result had removed the existing porch. Mr. Kokesh would like to replace the porch in the same location, but ext-nd it 2' beyond the front of the house and add on a deck. 9 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 16, 1989 ZONING PILE #1466-KOKESH CONTINUED Gaf f roii said that in order to construct the 14' x 16' porch a front setback variance will be required and a side setback variance will be necessary for the construction of the deck. Ms. Roberta Schmidt, 3980 Watertown Road, said that Mr. Kokesh's house was in a state of disrepair when he purchased it. Since that time, he has greatly improved the house and she felt that the porch would be a nice addition. There —re no further comments from the public regarding this matter -nd the public hearing was closed. Planning Commissioner Brown inquired as to the owner of the property to the nortn? Chairman Kelley answered that the property was owned by Mr. Kokesh's father dnd was pasture area. Planning Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Kokesh if he had considered purchasing land from his father? Mr. Kokesh responded that it was not financially possible at this time. He said that the house was very small and would probably Le torn down at such time that he purchased land from his father. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Bellows, seconded by Planning Commissioner Brown, to recommend approval of the front and side setback variances to construct a porch and npen deck. Chairman Kelley questioned whether Bellows wished to include in her motion a condir.ion disallowing enclosure of the deck at a future time. Bellows amended her motion to include that approval is conditioned upon the deck remaining a deck only and may not be improved at any time in the future, Brown seconded. Motion, Ayes=7, Nays=O, Motion passed. #14f8 GRORGE PILLSBURY 1300 BRACKETT'S POINT ROAD VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 8:25 P.M. TO 8:40 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. Thomas Meyer and Mr. Herb Baldwin were present representing the applicants. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that the Pillsburys wished to put a greenhouse addition on their existing residence located less than 75' from the lake. Gaffron said that the existing hardcover located within the 0-75' setback zone would increase to 7.6%. Gaffron further explained that the applicants were also proposing to put some kind of drain tile in the 0-75' setback that would lead back to the 75-250' zone to a wet well. 10 ....�,�<t Ps•s,r•. ,,,..0, .2 .•.++p l"s,.LT�';'.. •"'f .V—.. 'tea-;—�,-.__a",,vr_._ '>': _ . "E'. :..... �<,'. ... ,,,Y MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 16, 1989 ZONING PILE #1468-PILLSBURY CONTINUED Planning Commissioner Brown questioned whether the City Engineer had reviewed the drainage concept being proposed? Gaffron replied that the City Engineer had only conceptually approved of the plan, but had not received the plans in time to fully review them. Planning Commissioner Bellows said that the drainage and addition are really two separate issues. Planning Commissioner Johnson asked whether the sketch plan showed existing or proposed plantings? Mr. Baldwin explained that he was going to try to preserve the desireabl.e plants on the bank and then supplement them with more plantings that would help prevent erosion. Chdirman Kelley asked what is the hardship for the variance in this case? Mr. Baldwin said that it was the applicant's intention to have a plant room that has the kind of sun orientation necessary. 7n the process of constructing the addition, they will address the problems with the existing grades and drainage on the property. Mr. Meyer explained the scheme of the existing house in relation ~c, the need *o locate the greenhouse as proposed. Planning Commissioner Bellows said that she understood that the greenhouse would be used for growing crchids. She said that an orchid house is more sensitive than a regular greenhouse. She said that the orchids need a more southeast orientation rather than south or southwest. Planning Commissioner Hanson suggested that the greenhouse addition be shorter so that it would not extend toward the lake to the degree now proposed. There were no comet- from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing w, losed. Planning Commissioner Johnson said that he did not have a problem with the hajdcover, even though it is in the 0-75' setback zone, due it, part because the slope to the lake is so steep that any runoff goes directly to the lake. He questioned whether a grading plan had been submitted? Mr. Baldwin said that he would work with staff to establish limitations for the amount of grading that the City will allow. Planning Commissioner Brown noted that there would be a new 2 foot retaining wall. He informed Mr. Baldwin that the City is sensitive of the visual aspect of retaining walls and that I1 - r:�gY�l...+�...•.r r ....�•,.r�'�^s.errl�'.i..a�s�ti—�r�.-.r?�*�[�+�r! s MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 16, 1989 ZONIN3 FILE #1468-PILLSBURY CONTINUED screening is usually required. Mr. Baldwin said that plantings would be placed in front for screening. There were no comments from the public; regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Planning Commissioner Bellows, to recommend approval of the hardcover variance, average lakeshore setback variance to construct an ad ition and a conditional use permit for minor grading in the lakeshore yard, conditioned on the applicants working with City staff to establish grading limits. Chairman Kelley inquired as to what direction water running off of the roof of the addition will go? Mr. Meyer said that a drain spout will be installed that will direct drainage west. Motion, Ayes-5, Cohen, Kelley, Nay, due to their opinion that there is not a stifficient hardship to warrant encroachment of the 0-75' setback zone. #1469 CITY OF ORONO RIGHT-OF-WAY OF WINDJAMMER LANE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 8:53 P.M. TO 8:58 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication ;-nrJ Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron explzined that the City wished to install a civil defense siten within the right-of-way near 835 Windjammer Lane. Lieutenant Cheswick informed the Planning Commission of the locations of sirens throughout the City. He said that Minnetonka Beach is considering the installation of a siren in their area. The Windjammer Lane location was selected in order to provide protection for the northwestern a..ea of Orono. He said that there is currently no siren in that area. Mr. Chuck Bidwell indicated that he did not object to the noise impact, but was concerned about the visual impact. Planning Commissioner Bellows questioned whether there were alternate locations for the siren? Mr. Bidwell said that it was his understanding that other sites were considered, but the Windjammer Lane site was selec-:ed. He said that the Police Chief had suggested placing the siren on the Lakeview Golf Course. Cheswick indicated that the owner of the Golf Course had indicated that he did not want the structure on his property. Chairman Kelley indicated that he would rather locate the 12 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 16, 1989 ZONING FILE 91469-CITY OF ORONO CONTINUED siren on a golf course than in the midst of a residential area. The entire Planning Commission concurred. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Cohen, seconded by Planning Commissioner Hanson, to table this application to allow time to explore other alternative locations. Hanson said that he would like to see the alternate locations be public right-of- ways, City -owned land and not in the midst of a residential area. Motion, Ayes-7, Nays=0, Motion passed. MISCELLANBOUS Chairman Kelley reminded the Planning Commission of the upcoming joint meeting on November 8 to discuss the City Facilities. Planning Commissioner Hanson indicated that he will be out of town and unable to attend. APFROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Planning Commissioner Cohen, seconded by Planning Commissioner JohnEon, to approve the minutes of the September 18, 1989 Planning Commission Meeting. Motion, Ayes=7, Nays=O, Motion passed. PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE It was agreed that Planning Commissioner, Maureen Bellows, would i _present the Planning Commission at the N..� ir:.nber 13, 1989 City Council Meeting. ADJOURNMENT The October 16, 1989, Planning Commission Meeting adjourned at 9:05 p.m. 13 Wednesday Friday Saturday Monday Thursday Saturday Wednesday W@dnesday 10-24-89 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 473-7033 L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE November b December 1989 11-08-89 Advisory Committee, Management plan 7:00 p.m. Tonka Bay City Hall 11-17-89 EWH TA9k Force 8:30 a.m. Freshwater Foundation, Navarre 11-18-89 Water Structures 6 Environment Committee 7:30 a.m. LMCD Office, Wayzata 11-27-89 make Use Committee 4:30 p.m. LMCD Office, Wayzata 11-30-89 Irtcrgov.rnmental/Funding Advisory Subcommittee 7:00 p.m. Tonka Bay City Hall 12-02-89 Management Plan Overview - Invited public officials and agency personnel 7:30 a.m. Lafayette Club 12-06-89 7:30 p.m., Regular Meeting, LMCD Board of Directors Tonka Bay City Hall 12-13-89 Advisory Committee, Management Plan 7:00 p.m. Tonka Bay City Hall 'OCT xu L. M.C.D. Lake Minnetonka Conserva`inn District LMCD Fee I) � /i 6 (for __.ICD use) Because this inrm is ! to be copied, please ! use black ink or type.! 1 APPLICATION: SPECIAL DENSITY PERMIT City of Wayzata (Print or type owner's name) 600 Rice Street, Wav::ata, MN 5-391 (Owner's address) the owner of land in the City of Wayzata Business name: (if different from owner) (Street address) (Mailing address if different from street address) DENSITY 473-0234 Phone; if no answer, call: 937-9510 Phone; if nc answer, call: which is riparian to LMCD area(s) Wayzata Bay,_ No(s)._29 Lake Minnetonka, applies pursuant to LMCD Code Chapter III for a Special Density Permit, in accordance with all data and other information submitted herevith and made a part hereof. The following must accompany this application: (a) Locator map (d) Site plan of dockage on/or (b) County plat of area to overlay survey (c) Certified survey and leg-,' description (e) Dock constrLction detail sheet 1. Type of facility ( )Outlot association M Municipal ( )Commercial marina (please check one): ( )Multiple dwelling ( )Transient ( )Private club ( )Private multiple ( )Other (explain)_ 2. ti>ended „_ of facility Increase boat slips from 85 to 100 in Siry marina 3. Abutr w, ,)roperty owners at the lakeshare: North or West City property to the west (Name and MAILING address) South r East Minnetonka Boat Works to the east, 294 Grove 1,Anf-, Wayn ra (Name and PIAILING address) Other affected parties none (Names and MAILING addresses - attach sheet it necessary) Special Density Permit Application Page 2 City of Wayzata (Name) j 4. Site lake frontage: 2,150 feet. 5. Computation of number of Watercraft Availability Units (WAUs): Frontage k,150 feet ; 50 - 43 WAUs at one boat ,per 50 feet. 6. Number of WAUs applied fcr: 100 i. Density of WAUs applied for: Frontage 2,150 feet : IN _(number of WAUs) _ _ 21.5 feet per WAU. 8. Special requirements (43.081, Subd. 51: Please indicate benefits to the Lake and other factors upon which this permit should be consid*•red. Amenities may be from Group B, Group C, and/or Group D below, but at least one must be from Group A. Attach description, photos, scaled drawings, etc. A. Public Access (1) Provides slips for an additional 15 persons and/or families. _ (2)_ Those 15 slip holders possibly may free up 15 spaces at a public ramp or launch. (3) B. Environmental Protection (1) _ (2) C. Public Service (1) Same a, "A" above. (2) D. Other Amenities �1) (3) - E. Other Factors (2) — -- -- — -- - ( 3 )- 9. All required perciits, licenses and approvals have been obtains -m the City in which _ Special Density Permit facility is located, and from the MDNR: ( )Yes (X)No: explain: Application —submitted to ta)NR; appr.-jval te.kes up to 60 days Each n.w slip will have a 12" moor.ng past 16' from the bow ring. No docks will be installed. i 1 i � ► + # f.— .J)- GAR-f � =ti«►4ITT" %S L= sty t \ + . _�• • • • �-.,C.�a � \ F I LVVP DAM FILM 1mDD LAO I� 1 •LAW ij • _ i P e t~/ \ • -r + •iI j E�tLIGHT r� CAE: • MAR, INA + ,+ \ • MEA"4 WTER 9.95 `— --- ' L •., o GH# ►IL70 DAM ; • I \; j�`� "t16 Y � � ± r I ��; f V I • wt • R O ,.5, ♦ —t- ;� �• I EXISTING ^, LIGHr r _ BRIDGE A OUP PAP •PARR MI x A_RS-A_ -� -•- ---- pw g p C, ` a FILM •��`\� !ems LN HTI WOOD DOCK B. J9 : jo - ` UPPERMARNA I i MEAN WATER 929 5 c 090 ° W= DOCK A l Ida • EDOSTING `w 1 DOGE i 1 R 1 P RAP �; i� LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT IN RE: APPLICATION OF MINNETONKA YACHT CLUB/ LAKE MINNETONKA SAILING SCHOOL FINDINGS The hearing on the application for a special density license and new dock license for the Minnetonka Yacht Club/Lake Minnetonka Sailing School was held at 7:00 p.m. on May 24, 1989, at the Tonka Bav Village Hail. The Applicant was repre^ented by Mr. Thomas Maple. The Applicant is the owner of property ider,.rfied as Lighthouse Isl-,nd in Bay St. Louis, LMCD Area 33. Lighthouse Island has 1003.8 lineal feet of shoreline and is currently licensed for facilities for 40 transient and 5 service slips. The Applicant seeks a special density license for the construction of facilities which would allow one additional service slip and 21 additional slips for sailboat storage. The maximum number of boat storage units (BSUs) for which the Island could be licensed is 100. Therefore, the 67 BSUs requested here are well below the maximum. Nine of the slips will be used for small keel boats used for public sailing lessons and 12 for yacht club members. Given the fact that the facilities will be used primarily for sailboats and given the location of the facility, the Board finds that the review criteria of LMCD Code Sections 2.03 and 2.05 are met and that the amenities set forth in the following Order are sufficient to justify issuance of a special density license and a new dock license. ORDER On the basis of the foregoing, it is ordere-1 that - new dock license and special density license be granted to the Applicant on the following conditions: 1. The licenses are granted for construction and maintenance of facilities for 67 BSUs in accordance with the dock plan attached hereto as Attachment One and hereby made a part of this Order. 2. The licenses are conditioned on the continuing maintenance of the following public amenities, each of which has been suggested and agreed to by the Applicant. a. Twenty-one of the non -transient storage slips shall be used only for the storage of sailboats. b. The Island steel shoreline support and landscaping shall be maintained. C. The Licensee shall operate a sailing school for members of the general public which could instruct and train appro.cmately 400 students per year. d. The Licensee shall provide and maintain public toilets, telephones and dumpsters at its Lighthouse Island and Carson Bay facilities. e. Licensee shall maintain VHF and CB radio communications c,n Lighthouse Island. f. Licensee shall provide public access for local, regional, national and olympic competition. g. Sailing school shall not be operated on holidays. h. Licensee shall donate to the City of Deephaven a "make-ready" dock to be located at the Carson Bay access. In the event the City of Deephaven declines to accept the clock or to maintain it, licensee shall install appropriate signage to inform the public of the t availability of public telephones, toilets and dumpsters required in this Order. 2 The licenses granted herein shall confer no vested rights in the use of Lake Minnetonka. All such use is subject to continued regulation by the District to assure the public of reRsonable and equitable access to the lake. By Order of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board of Directors, this _ day of 1989. LK110-011 Eugene R. Strommen, Rxecutive Director Lake Minnetunka Conservation District 3 j t f a 64 -r — °vmO mopm v t F� I �CNOCL CIU� t,•� E'ORAOE BTOAA6E �� t CARETAKI M S I WOMEN MEN AiARTWINt 1 �. 7 '_BURTON_ ci MAIN +TALL S� ROdMArm j 400 =k� _=NO-- OiitCE j• j 1 -�---_ �� ' ' ffr77" v- . r t) i 11 I J. o a .- UR � Nw/K� N/.f .� / /Mf/� K.00\ N.r• �L r / Attachment One E.R.. (filled In by EQB) 5/1/84 Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) MARK APPROPRIATE BOX: REGUI.AR EAW ❑ SCOPING EAW NOTE TO REVIEWERS: For regular EAWs, written comments should address the accuracy and completeness of the EAW Information, potential Impacts that may warrant Investigation and/or the need for an EIS. For scoping EAWs, written corn- ments should address the accuracy and completeness of the information and suggest issues for Investigation in the EIS 'uch comments must be submitted to the Responsible Government Unit (RGU) during the 30•day period following notice of the EAW's availability In the EQB Monitor. Contact the EQB (mr .ro: 612/296.8253: non -metro: 1.800.652.9747. ask for envi. ronmental review program) or the RGU to find out when the 30•day comme— -orlod ends. 1. Project Name Wayzata Yacht Cluh-TPm nrary Mirino ing Fi l-dRelocation Z. Propos.rr_ Weyzata Yacht Club 3. RGU Lake Minnetonka .onservatiun Distric Contact Person _ ruce Tam Contact Person Address1705 James Ct and Title 4.Aprnsv i 11 a e MN .5-5 3 17 Address Phone 894-6782 Phone 4. Project Location: 1/4 SW '/. Section 5 & 6 Township T117N Range R22W a. Count✓ Name Hennepin City/Township Name Wayzata b. Attach copies of each of the following to the tAW: 1. a county snap showing the general area of the project. 2. a copy(iesi of USGS 71/2 minute. 1:24.000 scale map. 3. a •ite plan snowing the location of significant features such as proposed structures, roads, extent of flood plain. wetlands, wells, etc. 4. an existing lar.d list map and a zoning map of the immediate area, if available. 7. Describe the proposer.' project completely (attach additional sheets as necessary). Temporary relocation of existing 22 boat mooring field from 400 ft. from shore to 800 .ft. from shore. (sec at-t.ached site plan) The relocation is in response to the low water level in Lake Minnetonka. In the :last two years water depth in the 400 ft. mooring arra was lower than the 6 ft. depth required for deep draft sailboats. The mooring field will consist of concrete anchors connected to approved bouys with chain. 1 6. Reason forEAWpreparadon: -Discretionary EAW covering mooring field relocation 4 List all mandatory category rule "s which apply: 7. Estimated construction cost Less than $1000 8• Total project area (acres) __Mooring Field 5.71 or length (miles) 9. Number of residential units 9 or commercial, indusiJal, or institutional square footage L •0. Number of proposed parking spaces Automobile —None L1 • List all known local, state and federal permits/approvals/funding required: -- ••' . Level of Government Type of Application Status Federal: State: Local: Lake Minnetonka _Mooring Conservation District Field Permit Renewal of Temporary Annual Permit .20 Is the proposed project inconsistent with the loc,,l adopted comprehensive land use / plan or any other adopted plans? 2 No ❑ Yes If yes, explain: . 3. Describe current and recent past land use and development on and near the site. Current site is used as a boat marina since 1965. Area around the marina is residential. • Approximately how many acres of the site are in each of the following categories? (Acreages should add up to toed project area before and after construction.) Before After Before After Forest/ Wooded O O Wetland (types 3.8) O Cropland O Impervious Surface Brush/grassland 0_ Other (specify) 5e nascribe the soils on the site, giving the SCS soil classification types, if known. Lake bottom 6. Does the site contain ; eat soils, highly erodible soils. -seep slopes. sinkholes. shallow limestone formations. abandoned wells, or any geologic harsrds? If yes. show on site map and explain• RNo Yes 7. What 1s th• apptastmaia depih in 1ra1 2 1 tp• Does any part of the project area involve: a. shoreland zoning district? No Yes b. delineated 100-year flood plain? No Yes c. state or federally designated river land use district? No Yes If yes, Identify water body and applicable state classification(s), and describe measures to protect water and related land resources: 1 9. Describe any physical alteration (-.g., dikes, excavation, fill, stream diversion) of any drainage system, lake, stream, and/or wetland. (Describe measures to minimix ,! Im- pairment of the water -related resources. Estimate quantity of material to be dredged and indicate where spoils will oe deposited. No -physical alteration. Relocation of mor:ring field being done instead of dredging. 0. a.Will the project require an appropriation of ground or surface water? If yes, explain (indicate quantity and source): LJ No ❑ Yes b.Will the project affect groundwater levels in any wells (on or off the site)? If yes. ex- plain: [a No ❑ Yes �. Describe the erosion and sedimentation control measures to be used during and after construction of the project. None required r - a. Will the project generate: 1. surface and stormwater runoff? No Yes 2. sanitary wastewater? No Yes ?. industrial wastewater? No Yes 4. cooling water (contact and noncontact)? 9No H Yes If yes. Identify sources, volumes, quality (if other than normal domestic sewage), and treatment methods. Give the basis or methodology of estimates. b. !dentify receiving waters, including groundwater, and evaluate the impacts of the discharges listed above. If discharges to groundwater are antic' -tied, provide per- colation/permeability and other hydrogeologicai test data, if a .able. Will the project generate (either during or alter construction): a. air pollution? No Yes b. dust? No Yes c. noise? No Yes d. odors? INO Yes s, explain, including as appropriate: distances to sensitive land uses: expected iev- duration of noise: types end quantities of air pollutants from stacks. mobile Ind fugitive emissions (dusil: odor sources. and mitigative measures for any wive the basis or meihodulugv d estimates. nce project is a relocation, no additional noise or air pallution will be generated. .1 4. Describe the type and amount of solid and/or hazardous waste including sludges and ashes that will be generated and the method and location of disposal: None 25. Will the project affect: n, fish or wildlife habitat, or movement of animals? No ❑ Yes b. any native species that are officially listed as state endangered, threatened, rr of special concern (animals andlor plants)? No ❑ Yes If yes, explain (identify species and describe Impact): 26. Do any historical, arrhaeological or architectural resources exist on or near the project �-L site? If yes, explain (show resources on a site map and describe Impact):- l� No ❑ Yes 27. Will the project cause the Impairment or destruction of: :. . a. designated park or recreation areas? No Yes ± b. prime or unioue farmlands? No Yes c. ecologically sensitive areas? No Yes d. scenic views and vistas? No Yes e. other unique resources (specify)? No Yes If yes. explain: Sailboats in the mooring ld will become more visible from residences on the east side Wayzata faent Club 28. For each affected road indicate the current average daily traffic (ADT), increase in ADT contributed by the project and the directional distributions of traffic. Since the project is a relocation of mooring field, no additional automobile traffic will be generated over pr6vious usages 29. Are adequate utilities and public services now available to service the project? If not. what additional utilities and/or services will be required? Summary of Issues ❑ No L=, Yes ,or regilar EAWs, list the issues as identified by "yes' answers above. Discuss alternatives and mitigative measures for these sues. For scoping EAWs, list known issues, alternatives, and mitigative measures to be addressed in EIS. Impairment of Scenic Views - This relc-ation is temporary and necessitated by the unusual drought conditions in Minnesota. Wnen the lake retlirms to the normal controlled level the mooring field will be moved back to its 400 ft. location. Since the temporary 800 ft. location will be under an Annual District Mooring Permit the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District can enforce movement back to the pre -drought 400 ft. location. :ERTIFICATION BY RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENTAL UNIT hereby certify that the information conwinrd in this document is true and complete to the best of my knowledge and that i opies of the completed EAW have been made .n.ulabie to all puinrs on the official EQ8 distribution list ')ate 'T iynaturt t VA :� : 20 a V 0 3 3 NOTE ; WA-7 r)fr'TI� - — -- G PROPERTY LINE T LETSTNAN 2 ft--�-- % $HApEn SPIVS tc FAdn DOMED 1 CLU0JLJL��. A ,1 u 69 9 9i Zoe I l\ NOTE ADD TIFMPORA4V DOCK ENTPNlrDNJ 1 130UY FI I- � � 1 I� EyrsTING 4ocr 1' F,Fco - \ - — - - -1 400 / i f'a[/rftTLR I \ / I 1 WITH LnKF LEVcL PT I Norio' 1726.1 CvrrEm r Dioru �\ To Top OF ICE I 1 600 1 \ AT Soo' I \ y1 9 r I \ AT 590� PROPOS E D I �I TEMPORn I?Y I F30UY FIELDZ i PELOCATED'1 I goo NORTH 00 I I 80p It 5 LE _ I LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT WATEk STRUCTURES 6 ENVIRONMENT COMITTEE A G E N D A 700 a.m., Saturday, )v vember 18, 1989 LMCD Office; 'Wayzata 1. Study report (attached) on moratorium proposal I I i N& 1310 2. City of Wayzata New Dock License and Special Density Permit applications for expansion in upper lagoon, with public hearing set for December 6 (plan attached) 3. Minnetonka Yacht Club/Lake Minnetonka Sailing School Order (attached) for app: ,val 4. Inspet—,-, -sports/ refunds Rosenblum/Ulrich dock length variance (Carson* say, Deephaven) S. 1969 Dock License application for approvals Crystal day Service (late submittal) 6. Additional business recommended by the committee ENVIIRROII!laI1T i 1. Wayzata Yacht Club - Environmental Assessment Worksheet (attached) for District Mooring Area 2. 1989-1990 Deicing applications for approval ). EWM update A. Equipment maintenance status B. Exploration for barge transport, harvester to shore 4. Additional business .acommended by the cosssittee 11.9-89 E LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT V Study Report Mora`:rium on Multiple Docks 4:00 pm, Tuesday, November 7, 1989 LMCD Offices, Wayzrta depot TO: Water Structures & Environment Committee FROM: Chair Jim Grathwol Present: Water Structures & Environment Committee Chair Jim Grathwol, Excelsior; J.MCD Directors Doug Babcock, Spring Park; LMCD Chair Dave Cochran, Greenwood; John Lewman, Minnetri.sta; Bob Rascop, Shorewood; Dave Arndorfer and Frank Mixa, Cons:.lta.:ts; Gene Strommen, Executive Director A review of an interim ordinance restricting the licensing, construction and maintenance of new commercial and mulciole docks and new docks making common use of adjacent dock -use -areas was :undertaken by persons in attendance at the invitation of Grathwol. The inter'_m ordinance was prepared by attorney LeFevere in response to the need to study zontrols which may be required as the density of boats on Lake Minnetonka continues to grow according to the Management Study underway b; Arndorfer Associates. The int.erim ordinance was presented to the Water Structures & Environment Committ-se at its October 14 meeting. Chair Cochran agreed that the ordinance will require further study, and asked Grathwol, who was appointed chair of the Water Structures & Environment Committee at tae October 25 Board meeting, to pursue further study of this iriterim ordinance. The study group meeting at this time reached a consensus for recommendation to the Water :structures & Environment Committee consisting of the following: 1. An ordinancF change should be prepared to remove Type 3 and higher wetlands from any cjn�:iderat.)n toward shoreline footage requirement applicable to watercraft storage, provided a right -to -access is protected. (See attach- ment for Wetland definition and types.) 2. Consider an ordin- which would prohibit docks which would create a condo- minium dock over t ater. 3. The Water Structures & Environment Committee should consider amending the proposed interim ordinance to accept land -zoned single family residential which must meet the 1.50 requirements for watercraft wider the existing ordinance, provided wetlands of Type 3 and hig;ier are not included i the computation of the lakeshore. 4. Require that the interim ordinance be terminated after three years. ERS:jIm enc: Interim ordinance, amending S� 01 Wetlands Definition, Types Density Condition Projections Lake Access, Use Management Summary One for 50' Rule/Four Boat Rule Summary D%velopment Dtstricts Proposal (not recommended by the study group) ORDINANCE NO. 1NTERIP•; ORDINANCE FOR TIIE PURPOSE OF PROTECTING L[,,K15 MI1'INI,TotJf(A, TIIE PLANNING PROCESS, AND TIIE HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFA'tE OF THE PUBLIC, AND RESTRICTING THE LICENANG, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF N-W COMMERCIAL AND MULTIPLE DOCKS AND NEW DOCKS MAKING COMMON USE OF ADJACENT PUCK USE AR►:AS The Board of Directors of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation Di,-,tr:ct ordains: Section I. Background. 1.01. The District is currently undertaking a study for the purpose of establishing a comprehensive Management Plan for Lake Minnetonka (the Plan). 1.02. A part of the Plan deals with the subject of lake access including public access And boat storage on the lake, the increase of boat use on the lake which results from such access and storage, and the implications of such increased boat use for recreation, safety, and the environment. 1.03. At periods of peak usng^ the lake is at or exceeding its reasonable carrying capacity for boat usage. Increased access or increased boat storage in the lake will result in a Nigher level and intensity of boat usage. 1.04. 'hie lnice is suhjcct to continuing pressure from increased developrr.ent, which pressure is expected to continue. 1.05. Approximately 8,000 boats are currently stored on Lake Minnetonka. Access by trailering with rensontihly accessible parking for cars and trailers is available for approximately boats. 1.06. It is anticipated that public access for trailered boats will continue to increase. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has indicated that access with dedicated parking for an additional 350 boats will eventually be made available. 1.07. The most restrictive density limitntion currently contained in ,he LMC'D Code is one boat per fifty feet of shoreline. On a lakewide basis this standard would allow storage of approx.matel, 13,500 boats, more than 5,000 in excess of the numbrr currently stored on the lake. However, other density lirnitntions, such as those Applicable, to residential sites and commercial docks with speciAi density license.39 are eonsidernhly less restrictive, allowing the potential for boat story[Ye tit a significantly higher density Additionally man-1 existing dock facilities on the lr(ke have been "grnndfathered" ' ; the LMCD Code At their current den5i►v, therrhy leaving less capr,city for growth of other uses. 1.08. Although the Plan has not yet been completed, it hna hoeome .apparent that current LMCT) regulatory controls on nc- !ss and b')At storage are nct adequate to ensure the protection And preservation of the lake as A natural resource; to protect the puhlic health, safety and welfare; to preserve the recreational value of the lake; or to provide equitable access to the lake for riparian owners and for the general public. 1.09. The K Latest growth in host storage facilities in recent past has been In commercial and multiple docks including facilities of homeowner associations and in docks making common use of adjacent dock use areas. 1.10. This continuirg growth, if unrestricted, will neceszitate the establishment o` substantially more restrictive regulatory controls on hoat storage the future, wh;ch controls will impose significant hardships and . racerbate inequities in access to the Lake. 1.; 1. The studies in progress will generate the information nee(,nd for the Board to make informed det-i-::,ns about Appropriate regulatory controls ^n boat storage. 1.12. Pending completion of the study no.-stablishment of appropriate regulatory controls, t,sere is a need f an interim ordinance to h" adopted for the protection of the I,n..e And of the public health, safety And welfare And for the purpose of ensuring An orderly planning process designed to sect-e reasonable and equitable access to th<- Lake for riparian owners and for the general public. Section 2. Prohibition. 2.01. During the perio(i that this interim ordinance is in effect, no new multiple docks or mooring Areas or commercial docks as defined in LMCD Corle, Section 1.02, Subdivisions 8 and 28, and no new docks making common use of adjoeent dock use Areas -lursuant to LMCD Code, Section 2.01 Subdivision 3, shall be constructed, established or maintained. flocks and mooring areas shall be deemed to be new uniess they Arc previously existing and, in the case of facilities requiring licenses or permits, duly authorized by the District. No modifications or alterations of facilities described in this paragraph shall be permitted. 2.02. During the period that th's interim ordinance is in effect, no applications for licEn4es or permits for facilities described in paragraph 2.01 shall be accepted, processed or considered by the District. Section 3. Applicability. 3.01. This ordinr . shall not apply to facilities for which the District has received cc,. . •, , e applications prior to __----__ _ 3.02. .This ordinance shall not apply to applications for temporary low water variances for modification of existing facilities provided the variance does not increase the size of slips or the number of boats stored at tine facility. Section 4. Effective Dates. 4.01. This ordianime shall be effective the day following its publication and shall expire on _ , unless earlier repealed or extended by the iT-oard This ennctrnerit is in effect from anti after its passnge nrid publication in accordance with the enabling act of the District. It is enacted by a majority vote of all the members of the Board and hes the effect of an ordinance. Adopted by the Lib1CD Board of Directors this day of _ � , 1989. Arl'ES'r: Eugene. Strorninen, cecutive Director LK 110-4 David Cochran, Chairman il WETLANDS DEFINITION: On January 10, 1989, four Federal agencies, the Corps of Engineers, Fish and Wildlife Service, Environmental Protection Agency and the Soil conservation Service, agreed on a unified method for identifying and delineating wetlands. They also adopted the Corps of Engineers' definition of a wetland: "Wetlands are those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions." WETLAND TYPES The classification system most commonly used by regulatory agencies, including the DNR and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Is the Fish and Wildlife Service Circular 39 system. The eight wetland types occurring in Minnesota are: Type 1. Seasonally flooded basins and flo,s. Type 2. Inland fresh meadows. Type 3. Inland shallow fresh marshes. Type 4. Inland deep fresh marshes. Type 5. Inland fresh open water. Type 6. Shrub swamps. Type 7. Wooded swamps Type 8. Bogs. The DNR and the Watershed District define wetlands for regulatory purposes as those areas classified as Type 3, 4 and 5 wetlands. POINT: The controls for densities 8.0 and 7.0 need to be studied and an implementation plan established by the LMCD which include the following activities. Density 8.0 (Present Conditions) From the Lake Access Plan: Fix homeowner associations at existing levels, Manage marinas to assure their services are open to all citizens of the state, Issue no special density permits at municipal or homeowner association licensed docks, Ban further sales of condominium docks, in any form, Develop a plan for managing excursion boating, Allocate 350 additional (to 700) car/trailer parking spaces for public and private access ramps. From the Use Management Plan: The LMCD shall continue its present system of managing use of the lake surface through ordinance and regulation, Improve law enforcement presence on the lake, Designate anchorages on the lake with appropriate restrictions, Develop a plan for providing further beaching/rafting areas, Refine the established program of imposing limits on the use of bays with the greatest use density, Coordinate development and implementation of an agl;ressive boater education program in Hennepin County, Coordinate a legislative program to obtain state boat operator licensing, Coordinate a legislative program to obtain boat titling and registration, Study means of limiting boat wakes, Restrict use of and/or license operators of personal watercraft and sailboards, Density 7.0 From the Lake Access Plan: Fix municipal access at existing levels, Link further access growth in any form with increased law enforcement presence on the lake, Determine the source of the growth in density, then impose restrictions to slow growth of the forms of access responsible for the growth, Review the 1:50 and 1:10 rules to determine if a more restrictive one is needed, and Review the rules governing riparian storage of boats. From the Use Management Plan: Determine the source of the growth in density, Review the need for lowering the speed limit, day and night, Review use and storage densities of individual bays for further regulation, Review the maximum boat for private watercraft and excursion boats, Require a certificate from an approved boater education course to operate a boat on the lake, and Undertake a study of conflicts on the lake to identify groups in conflict and to determine the appropriate management remedies, Restrict ultralighe take -off and landings from 9:00 am to 6 00 pm the following day on weekends and holidays, and Continue to develop anchorage opportunities, particularly through public acquisition of riparian property. POINT: Because the 350 additional car/trailer parking spaces have already been allocated, the Management Plan calls for a study to be undertaken to decermine the plan of action for implementing the access and use controls for density 6.0, Density 6.0 From the Lake Access Plan: Link further access growth to development of anchorage opportunities at a ratio of one additional access unit to two anchorage units, Initiate a program to reduce and ultimately eliminate grandfathering at municipal and homeowner associations docks, Review the frontage -foot rules to determine if a more restrictive one is needed, and Review the rules guverning _jr,•4an storage of bcats. From the Use Management Plan: Impose use restrictions b 10:00 am and 6:00 pm on weekends and holidays, and Continue to develop anchorage opportunities, particularly through public acquisition of riparian property. LAKE ACCESS AND USE MANAGEMENT POINT: There are two fundamental management_ objectives that determine how access to the lake will me managed. One addresses access, the other use management. From the Like Access Plan: MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVE: The management of recreational boating access on Lake Minnetonka shall be based on density of use. As density increases on the lake as a whole or cn individual bays, lakes or arms, regulation shall become progressively more restrictive. From the Use Management Plan: MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVE: The management of recreational boating on Lake Minnetonka shall be based on density of use. As density increases on the lake as a whole o: on individual bays, lakes or arms, regulation shall become progressively more res'-ricrive. The progressively more restrictive regulation is triggered by the density of boats on the lake during normal peak hours on .iormal peak use days (between 12:00 noon and 3:00 pm, on summer Saturdays and Sundays that are not on holiday weekend-*,. Based on the 198. and 1986 use data, we are at a density of 8.1 usable acres of lake surface (Table 1). if just 19 active boats are added to the lake, then the density will be at 8.0. Based kin the multiple dock licenses already approved this year, that density will be _thieved the first year that the lake level returns to close to normal levels. TABLE Change in Potential Active Boats and Boat Density for Alternative Density Standards Change in Total Usable Active Active Acres Acres Boats Boats Pe- Boat Per Boat Acres 1,043 11773 Existing Density 1453 9.66 8.10 Growth to: 8.00 Acres per Boat 1472 19 4 54 8.00 7.00 Acres per Boat 1682 229 8.1s 7.00 6.00 Acres per Boat 1962 509 1.16 6.00 5.00 Acres per Boat '355 902 5.4: 5.00 4.00 Acres per Boat 2943 1490 4 71 00 3.00 Acres per Boat 3924 2471 3 ")H C3 2.00 Acres per Boat 5887 4434 31) 2.00 1.00 Acres per Bor,t 11773 10320 1 19 1.00 POINT: Neither the one for 50 rule nor the four boat rule for resident riparians is an acceptable basis for long -tern management of boat storage on the lake. Both rules are too generous, considering the nurroer of boats that could be added to the lake. One for Fifty Feet of Lakeshore Rule Hiles of shoreline: 125 miles Feet of shoreline: 66000U feet Theoretical maximum number of boats: 13200 stored boats Existing number of boats (1987): 4973 stored boats Theoretical allowable growth: 8227 stored boats ------------------------------------------------------- Fcur Boat Rule Number of Ripaiians: 4000 stored boats Theoretical mriximum number of boats: 16000 stored boats Existing number of boats (1987): 4973 stored boats Theoretical allowable growth --------------------------------------------------------- 11027 stored boats Sum-nary : One for Fifty Rule 8227 stored boats Four Boat Rule 11.027 stored boats Difference -2800 stored boats - ------------------------------------- ------ POINT: Growth in boat storage on the lake has favored m-lnicipal docks, marinas and homeowner associations over riparian snd public access in the period 1974-1987. Continuation of the present policies and rules of the LMCD will most probably continue his pattern except for the following. Municipal growth is finite. There is only so much municipally owned land qualifying for the one for fifty rule. Second, the nuir5er of marinas has not significantly changed in recent years, and may not in the future because of the land use controls of the cities. Therefore, the greatest growth most probably will be from homeowner associations. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS A possible compromise for establishing a moratorium is to consider the formation of v o en Districts. These would be portions of cities on the lakeshore that would be exempt from certain parts of the moratorium. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DEFINED A Development District is a creation of the LMCD with the advice and consent of the cities to provide for a period of stabilization to balance the different levels of single family residential Lakeshore development in riparian communities. Its purpose is not to control the configuration of the subdivision, but instead ro establish areas that will be excluded from any moratorium on licensing common docks. CRITERIA Shorelands may be included, at the discretion of the LMCD Board, only if A" of the following exist: 1. The property qualifies as developable under the municipal zonl.,g ordinance and the LMCD Code (for �,:.-t storage) without variances in these areas: lot width, lot area, building height (others to be added or considered). 2. The property is not now a part of any recorded subdivision. 3. The development plan and subsequent development.-. reform to the Standards and Criteria contained in the "Preliminary Shoreland Management Plan" as revised and its successors. 4 No Type III or higher wetlands may be considered in determining qualifying frontage for boat storage purposes. 5. All boat storage in a Development District must be at Ingle common dock. 6. Lands subdivided are immediately and permanently removed from the Development District. 7. During this moratorium, frontage shall be calculated on the basis of the sho_-test distance between lot lines at the point _.f intersection with the 929.4 contour. S. No non -riparian access shall be allowed PROCESS Cities shall have 90 days in which to request the establishment et a Development District. The LMCD Board shall establish a 91) day period during which requests for development c1stricts shall be accepted by the District A majority vote of the LXCD Board is required to establish each Development District within any single community. h N !I EI s i I J 50'-0" M ct SETBACK v 5ryn. CIA^ R Ou. NOTE ti Ni • a N 4 ODS W �,? PROPOSED BLDG. SITE 7 4� I !\5• I .W 3 1 \ AIa a \ aA e i W�1• e / �.\tea-+�,L _ `NOTE erg _ ZB N.rtn line of Section 7. T. 117. R. 23 11 `o 5 p 4 �•N' — — ss;;.�� .•tip,, .-�_ _- _ am 1 1e49- 1 �Y IID3E5 1 . EXISTING TREES O'ER 41 CAL IFER NEAR BUILDING. 2. SHRUBBERY TO BE CLEARED OUT AROUND BUILDING FOR S'-0•. 3. EXISTING GKNf EL WAKING AREA TO REMAIN. ZONED R1A RESIDENTIAL Surrey fall: TOLT2 KING. DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES DESCRIPTION: That Dart of tale Northwest 0uartor of Section 7, Mr:IwnshlD 117, Range 23 described as colwnting at a Dalnt of It.. 2224.40 feet amtherly frm the north line of said 54ctlon along a line running frm a point on the north line thereof distant 402.5G feet east f'- the northwest corner thereof to a point on the south Itne of said Northwest Duarbar a dlstance of 395t50 feet east frm the southwest corner thereof; thence southerl; along said Iix to the north lix of aerguist and vlcklunds Addition to Berouist and vlcklunds Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence Westerly along sax and along the north line oh BerRulst and Wirk- lunds Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota to the Past line of sal. Section 7; thence north .1.4 said It line to Its Intersection with a llx rmning witrly and parallel with the north Ilse of said Section from the point of beglnnlr l thenceasement over st33 feetthereof. Point east the9Sub Ject to road asemnt overthe - -- - o wehereo)7 certify that this is a true and correct ' ` Oa to 5 3_ Via, q I� �\ t1� �P eDresen II of a survey o1 the boundaries of the land above described and of the location of all buildings. If any, thereon and all Visible elltrmth- pp -POWER xnts, if any, frm or on said land. 1989. C1 y "Z9, Dated this lath day of September, LIGHT FIXTURE •� •�' CARLSON a CARLSON, INC. �\ NOTE M3 �ea--e,.pt,/`/ B �9uist;�4&luntls Rick `I i �O D SDRVE'f095 Park tends Addl tlbn t �\ y {B9' .SO"'l•Y ___ awry ou.urt, an -,e,.r MIAne to LIYIMsa Ib. 9018 ,•i nJs -`_._ __\ __ .`_ �.-L4if__ — T1 NOTE: Area Is 45,395 S9. Ft. or 1.042 acres e.clu,109 road easemnt. ,.✓ r � • 4 \ *41 \ \ 1 �1 6 PRISON INC AR SON — #146#3 DeSIGN �O ME OR U BEM A DULY REO STERED'PROFESSIONroN,ANEDrN r0 UNDER T LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINRESOTA / ` TOLii RING OUSAL. 4NOERSIT^. i T K DA ANUASSOIAIESInCGRPORAIFD -- F __ __ ___ ___ -_. _ _ — -__-- CONTEL OF MINNESOTA, INC. ST. PAUL, MN PROPOSED SITE PLAN 9609 `� ORIWING NO REMOTE SWITCH BUILDING —� SAGA HILLS, ORONO, MN DNA" R dl[C$ �+5/5 DATE EG NO/T+77 ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS SAINT PAUL MINNESOtA Nse 0. OATE BY [KSCRIPTION OF REVISIONS - NOI•In IIRe Of SeCtiOR 7, T. 117, R. 23 I i �D N pl 1 �• f�'f4 .iF �• t�A— EPIC L--��n D�' ` ..fa.� r,:' -- O, .. � :� APWCX. cIx,E OF W 'E� 6Ha DP-dY W ° _ R/glPSED SLCx srrLr 7\ --------------- — —............ '�„� I , 1 ` 9)CIkMhO1LS OE`V'aYG D,Cbr —. F T'ia YLfk . J' 1 \ . 1 �- r v `�.p1�1WIJIEI� RX,E rJ/ `i . n WILT riXTLLEL _ Aa .1 I'. •yi E }x L, F a 19,14 1. . EXISj GDTREEES opu4", EA _4ffR NEAR BUILDING. 2. SHRUBBERY TO BE CLEARED OUT AROUND BUILDING FOR 3. EXISTING GRAVEL PARKING AREA TO REMAIN. ZONED RIA RESIDENTIAL L VOLT,% -aiON AND ASC0r14TES {° DEsatclt... t t Thatwren - inmsnir 11 RA VOTE• Area I. ac, T-s cM, r, v t.n42 A—, REAR L' D PEa CF1ll/5T G OL O N ..114M DE — D -W cHE D r HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED 18AY A DULYLN NREGISTERED PROFEGR MY NRECT RSIOW�APGNIILT UNDER WS �57nNESOTA OATF.. O / _ TULTZ KING DUVALL ANDERSON TK DA ASSOCIATESINGURPORATED =_ --_ �_9i ---CONTEL __ST. E6�SAGA .<'� = -�. OF MINNESOTA, INC_ PAUL, MN PROPOSED SITE PLAN REMOTE SWITCH BUILDING HILLS, ORONO, MN COY4 NO REV NO 9�0 901 I - VCVY-EL I'FJ I.F.'.i,lJi•Y Q' eYrLVfi M,,1, _ _— — DRAWING ND C�i _AND ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS SAINT PAUL MINNESOTA N0. DATE 8r OE80NNTIOM OF NEV1810N8 I K+•f �10� pN m.�' r.c1 � si ll�air�u �� _ 2 r.,•.o� w ul.ew�rrr I. .R...a..... �� GUNROOM wELM. \'-.T-`1M .�0.�R.v ja WORK AREA , —`--G E RMSE w �ruc! I I Y�r.r rb AlaSTTING ARE BEDROOMr.— ��tiM ��.I..Kt.O. � T.4A. rI ."+.�.• i r +r,w�a Lww�wrtrle. �. Y � 1 1 M&N L�,r_ &% 2 PILLSBURY RESIDENCE PROPOSED ADDITION MAIN LEVEL PLAN L---------------------- PILLSBUPY RESIDENCE PROPOSED ADDITION EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS D 9t9.4 iuv. NfMwr Pow r ON Ob" (SA M SLALI As Ww ruw) PILLSBURY RESIDENCE SITE SECTION REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/ VARIANCE 12 OCTOBER 1989 \ ,�yt/ tf • .'� EXISTING TOP OF SLOPE 4K21 NL.IFVRPION ( <--'sxisrlNS �Vv \` �j ! Ir pibPOSED $O(AVS)HOH • 1 P�TZHO WALL • r"•. 11i \ A. �;-10N WALL. PPOPOSED same cur 70 M�iNA6E ERO"ION " C �,,, ,.�i •r,r, '•fir (APPi+O1C. (pO GU.VG.) ' rF0r17BcD ADDI-1 io\ • , \ to �I 3* A PPOPOSED WETV4- PEA :.SATED CAVef, f�..� � �(�O� •ice%/%- •� ��° \i, WA6-'rD PEBBL tsa-C) ND \ t / BLUESTONE STEPF:.+E� PPOROSEO LNNDSCFc I/ (WOODLswD 84FD'c� i p W f s v r+ EXISTING MAmpe 1500.4 TP406 \ 1 PILLSBURY RESIDEN. MEYER, SCHERER & ROCKCASTLE, LID• 12 OCTOBER 1989 SITE PLAN REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE To Vacate Utility Easement I Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, FO%HILL i The utility easeeent, betbg 5 feet on each side of the lot line between Lo and 2, Block 3, JOXHILL, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin' County. Minnesota and runs from the easterly line of said Lots 1 and 2, a�I distance of 20 feet westerly. i i I I / fl NE cor. Le12 PARCEL A - 45.201 Sq.Ft. PARCEL B • 2,695 Sq.Ft. PARCEL C . 43.468 Sq.Ft. PARCEL A i B - 47.896 Sq.Ft. OUN3019b `•^` [. .. McCombs Frank Roos k 15050 23ra Ave. N. Enj Plymoulh, MN 55447 PIS 6121476-6010 Su' i�T4t /� t I Te —. t ty Yr[ bu I r x. uw J, tarot. Sie •a1LV err•ea. MW 7 fw r •eY mAt •f W let 1W bw.ar bu t 7. mac. •ccatu.• to W te[rwr We ab[rf, 4rgU c..v. lur.ra• r r,we rra tr wWlr 1W of •W tw [ r 1. 1 PARCEL C r a ti' 1 W -50 v� s uua rum • . tf. rErts. ■ • 2, retm c • t), rNm•t■ 17. T CeWt• • —.0 Wa_a t 10 rW •rewt fr uu 0 f+er•e ewf, rrr r •true let x, neef 7. MSQLL. •[s'Y•1 u w rsvM eW tlt..M. �t•u frq. tlrreu. t•t• re lartr f fwa r ra rW of W felltMnleeeteiV 1W: rpn.{r u p{•t r w w[ lue d eW {et S. W W[ fO.m frt r.wry of w wuret r[r e< eW IK S, r •te•eaw •t— w1 wt 1W, urs wtr••taL r • prat r W rrU 3W of ••lG ba S, !W Wt IQf.m het ww� er W rerue•[t ate of WA let x W rY. SW wr twete•etq. cm a twos tfeeret tau tb er tflr q w c1q swell If w Ct4 01 rater. . cl•rt ]/tlrhtee of •I1 erttr Ku urrrt u w let Etvt•lon W lot errltrur. • orttr b e I— E bt 1, EltrY J. RIIIILL, rterdtq u w ..wra•E eLc [reef, xw•ru cwv. u,wru. rum • 7 t we of bt S. 11[ct 3. rm{t1J., .e—ttnt [a W —&II olet weer, Il�teeeu LrnV, ■te•e•eu. 11Lie rr0�rlr •r w rellr[q Erc:IW llr, MWNe•t • eot•e r w wt 1W er r•u be x, u.ert fo.m •l•ot it It W e•etYeet strafe W e•te bt S, r• eLLr wt IWt wew re[L,rurlr u .puts W .•eel lts o< O/ let S. LLetrt I.m r rrt w[rlr or W rtu••et ca.e.t or ..ta to x. rum c Lot S. �leu J. IOYILL, •eeouyr! u w rertaes slat [lwN. Ywe.0 fang, elnrru, refs wt fart or ru bt S lytq •ruerly of w rour{n1 EeteetW lw, roc •r—MNerlr P t ttleewiet l If e•1G bt2. 1rWr�t•�iem •foal ••ta wt IW; urea roetlrurly u • put r W mrN 1W of w0 bt x, uewt IOJ.m rrt w[r11 M w rrtlrrs [rarer ar rl• bs x. W Mreby cert[(y we Nt• {• • ter r mrnet mmm[•[{p of • eurnr of W bwMetlr of: b[ t r bt x. uort 3. xmtlu. •cc«ua1 N w r«ore.e rl.[ weer. ]reset,. Canty. ha,r.ee•. Ab of ttte lac•tlw of ell W11U,yt. W r LLl vutbl• aprwclrrU, ewrv[•tan, Nty1SNa lr. N rrwrN q r, ae wWr r ur•c[ EV t b. 3969. M1S mNT6. [11C. Irtl Suh•yee, { I,•t. Ma. 3093E * . .rrr.,.e[e,...rr.. r,.,. rct:••tee rrrt{teo•,t•w�•r•, i•a ,:. ., IrRLPARLO FOR: A n >N TAM eotofaua.e ^ gip,,,,, �-• :.] S1 pAN HOFFMAN 10'-0`' I CHANGES 'I ISSUE 1 9-18-89 JGS DRAWN PER SAGA HILLS REMOTE N _ h O w I a N NOTEM n 1) ALL BAYS O 8'-O" UNLESS NOTED pn 2) CELING HEIGHT - 9'-O" I v 3) BUILDING IS 10' X 16' a 1 - x m w z ¢ 7 Z) I S N 10 }, 2'-0" -n j it - 7 m O 5 N # h a Im '-6" X-O" 1'-6" 2'-O" Zm CONTEL OF MINNESOT INC. MOUND 16uocsi`' "o"'m -'' STORO - NONE ,+" �' � FLOOR PLAN EXC8 w IX M'ym 1 YYC9iP - .\` ^ '°rot �,� ` ;:tsg• .h_ •6.,Pit° tA dt '.,0,cs��E, 5d-d / '�tHt • � b� I - SLTD - d,r; _ �t\�0• yb" . -• tb, �, -' -L _ � L Y i0 = h �, I ° •tie '.tip '•�•�,�• 10 bra \• ��•''i � 1 o 0 Wert; LJG+at -�XTUP.0 ° North �3 BerOutstne oP Berauist ana w. ;-`9fe� unds Pa,-k Icklunds Aaciti �1 1 v GH yl�- i \ S N I A j NO