My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1986-04-02 On Site Sewage Treatment Inspection Report
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
C
>
Cygnet Place
>
261 Cygnet Place - 04-117-23-23-0013
>
Septic
>
1986-04-02 On Site Sewage Treatment Inspection Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2025 3:02:51 PM
Creation date
7/17/2025 2:55:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
261
Street Name
Cygnet
Street Type
Place
Address
261 Cygnet Place
PIN
0411723230013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
On for Nortb Sbore it f <br />/ ake Minnetonka <br />ON -SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT <br />INSPECTION REPORT POST OFFICE BOX 66 <br />1335 S. Brown Rd. <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />473-7357 <br />OWNERy f r Jl=f L�_ ADDRESS <br />rs£RMIT NO.-S. DATES CONTRACTORS - ? — <br />^.-ty Orc mane No, 210 rrquires that each on -site sawsge treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis. The on -site sewage <br />trsi trnatt system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. <br />(This is- an eKistinq system ❑ new construction) <br />01 Meets M exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design, construction, and location. Appears to be operating <br />properl". <br />L� 2 Does not meet all current City standards for new construction (1978 Code) but in most respects appears to be designed, <br />located, and constructed generally in accordance with previous codes. System appears to be functioning properly; no major <br />upgrading of the system is required at this time. <br />f �6es not meet current City standards in many respects relating to design, construction, ur location. Appears to be uperatmg <br />J:rfequately at this tune, but has a relatively high potential for future problems. No major upgrading of system is required at <br />th s time. <br />4 System may or may not meet current City s•andards for design, construction or location, but is fading to properly treat and <br />dispose of the current input and is endangering a vt at supply, or is a source of pollution to surface or groundwate. s, or is <br />creating a safety hazard, or is otherwise creating a public nuisance. elease contact the City Inspector to discuss system repair/ <br />replacement procedures. II drainfield replacement is necessary, sod testing will usually Le •equired, and a design and site plan <br />must be submitted for review. Your contractor must obtain a permit before work ii starti I. <br />SYSTEM CONDITION 1 [0 Checked items may require your action) <br />Tank inspection indicates: <br />❑ Pumpout not needed at this time. <br />❑ Solids accumulatinn in tanks indicates they should be pump. <br />ad out this Year to help prevent future problems. <br />❑ Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks <br />should be pumped cu,. as soon as possible. <br />❑ System is discharging to surface. Tanks must be pumped <br />within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge. <br />❑ Inspection risers missing —tanks could not be inspected. <br />Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe) must be Ir.talled in each tank <br />at next pumpout. If tanks have nut been iNimped out within <br />the last three veers, thev should be pumped out now. <br />SITE CHAHACTERISTICS <br />Limiting Site Factors <br />Slope <br />Soil 3 <br />❑ High water table . <br />❑ lot we <br />Lake, wetland, or sueem <br />❑ Drainage <br />inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle (Does not 7„ <br />give accurate measurement of solids accumulatio• ' If tanks <br />have not been pumped out within the last three .ears, they <br />should be pumped out now. <br />Drainfield inspection indicates. <br />❑ Ureinfield is dry, no surfacing evident. <br />Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. <br />C Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharq treated <br />effluent to the surface. This condition may re eplace- <br />ment or additions to drainfield. Contact the City rnsw2or <br />immediately. Repairs must be completed within 90 days. <br />❑ Drainfield extent and condition unknown. <br />Potential for S�stam Failun <br />(depends on soil types, water <br />table, and system condition) <br />❑ Low <br />❑ Medium <br />3aHim <br />System is causing visible <br />surface diuharge. <br />Site Capabilities for <br />Future Expansion <br />❑ Adequate <br />Fair <br />C7 Poor <br />n Inadequate <br />COMMENTS <br />;--T -ra iN s PECr7QAJ. <br />.1L__ [� <br />Date of Inspection Septic System in <br />Note In the event that ;his inspection report is used to satisfy the rapuirements for a mortgW or other ttansfer of property he advised That <br />this report does not guarantee or certify that on exist-ng system wall continue to function property, but is merely an opinion ! tlii adequacy <br />of the system under current condition. bowl on the available information. <br />This report insist tw kept on the prensHN with system location and pumping records <br />WHITE COPY Insp,•cir-,t s i t� GO,D COPY i Hnmeowne, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.