Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-06-12 Resolution 264116 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL i f�] 2641 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B), ARID SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 12 FILE #1402 WHEREAS, John Lehmeyer (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 320 Crestview Avenue within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lots 2, 3, 4, and the north 40.0 feet of Lot 5, all within Block 6, "Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka", Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of a deck to be located 28' from the rear lot line where a 50' rear yard setback is normally required, and a variance to Section 10.03, Subdivision 12 to allow the attached deck to extend to a distance less than the required 10' from the existing detached garage. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1402. 2. The property is located in the LR-lA Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 15, 1989 and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: A) The proposed deck will have no signi�icant impact on neighboring properties. B) The proposed deck replaces in kind a deck that had previously been removed to accommodate a swimming pool which itself now has been removed. Applicant intends to also replace in kind the existing deck, including an access stairway 4' from the garage. Page 1 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _ 2by1 The proposed deck in conjunction with construction of a fire wall in the adjacent detached garage will not pose a fire hazard to the property. The proposed deck has a platform height of 61, normally requiring maintenance of a 1C' s--back from other structures. 4. The City Ccuncil has considered this application includ'_ng the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the condit existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not :-ly generally to other property in this zoning district; t granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to al3eviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to allow construction of a deck 28' from the rear lot line where a 50 rear yard setback is normally required, and grants a variance to Section 10.03, Subdivision 12 t- allow the deck to be 8' from the detached garage with a stairway extending to a distance of 4' from the detached garage where a 10' setback is normally required, subject to the following conditions: 1. The portions of deck and stairway within 10, of the garage may never be enclosed either above or below the deck platform. 2. A suitable fire wall shall be constructed with.i,i the existing detached garage per building code requirements. 3. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (June 12, 1990). Page 2 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. '1641 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of June, 1989. AT T: bbfothy 'Hallin, City Clerk Jamey R. Grabek, ayor JL 41 �✓\ ✓mil l 11L•1L- Eroperty Ot7ner (s ) J STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged L,.-fore me on this 12th day of June, 1989, by James R. Grabek & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minresota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on let%a'f of the City. Notary Public I}/e�iQl: K. SCKEFFLE2 N Act IU6LIC — MINP4150TA hENNEPIN COUNTY My cornmwon uwres6.8.93 I My Commission Expires Pace 3 of 4 City of OHONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. -641 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) nn thi s r)��?n day of IIJ1980 before me--a—Not Try Public within and or said county, personally appeared , hNl� �f 1�1`'`� 1 hit (�'�� �- FPOJ' yjj� known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. r NOTARY ' LtiURIE K. S�N�FFLER _ c ic. NOTACt WEUC—MINf1►SOTA HENNEF.N COUNTY •~ My ccmmission •xpirns6.9.93 MY CONLVIISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 198, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 4 of 4