Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
06-26-1989 Council Packet
Q G O AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JUNE 26, 1989, 7:00 P.M. (*)Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda.Discussion will be held upon request.Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may WftftWT request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL 1.CONSENT AGENDA* JUN 2« 1989 CITY OF ORONO 2.Government Finance Officers Association presentation by Fred Christiansen APPROVAL OP MINUTES * 3. Regular Meeting of June 12, 1989 PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT **APPLICANTS**Immediately after the Council has reviewed your application please sign the three (3) original resolution copies. 4.#1326 Wayzata Country Club, 200 Wayzata Boulevard - Subdivision - Preliminary Plat Approval 5.#1407 Leopold Hauser, 475 Ferndale Road North - Subdivision - Preliminary Plat Approval #1391 Terry Sadler, 1395 Baldur Park Road - Denial Resolution #1410 Julie Prineaus, 1980 Heritage Drive - Variance - Resolution #1423 Edward Brown, 355 Stubbs Bay Road - Variance - Resolution 6. 7. 8. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT 9.Regional Transportation Board Nomination CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 10.Navarre Redevelopment Water Conservation Regulations 1990 Preliminary Budget Guidelines 1988 Audit Presentation Set Woodhill Public Hearing Date Highway 12 1991 Safety Improvements/Set Public Information Meeting City Facilities Tour - June 29, 1989 Performance Review - Randy O'Brien and Barry Rathbun Performance Review - Laurie Scheffler Liquor Ordinance Amendment 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JUNE 26, 1980, 7 s00 P.M. * 20. Administrator's Information Recycling Program County Road 116 Update Waterfowl Relocation .; 1^; f; • Shore,Iftnd. Regulations • &ighw6bd‘‘S'torm Sewer County Roa'.' 51 Parking Lake Minnetonka Regional Park Minnesota Safety Council CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT LICENSES (21*) BILLS (22*) ADJOURNMENT C ..f. . . • K.' TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat DATS: June 26, 1989 SUBJECT: Electrocution Accident - 6/21/89 At about 5 P.M. on Wednesday, June 21, 1989, a 7 year old boy visiting relatives in the Forest Lake area was evidently electrocuted by an electric pump motor. He apparently went to retrieve something in the vicinity of the pump and tried to yell for help as he was shocked. Efforts by a brother and step father were aided by Officer’s Erickson and Fritzler who arrived within 3-4 minutes and commenced CPR. Life saving efforts by them were continued by North Paramedics when they arrived. They were assisted by Mound Fire/Rescue personnel and others. Excellent work was done by all personnel involved, however, with no success. A subsequent investigation has been undertaken by Officer Erickson who requested a review by the State Electrical Inspection Division. The pump in question (located on land near the shore) was used to pump water from the lake. An initial review points to problematic wiring at the pump. It is anticipated that an article to the community regarding electrical safety, particularily outdoors and near water will be forthcoming. Please see me if you have further questions. [f©lDWif^ I ! I JUN 2 61989 ' I J Aiar*, at., Mr. Jim Grabek Mayor: Orono Re: Crystal Bay Rd. Dear Mr. Grabek, As a resident of Crystal Bay Rd. I am writing to you with my concerns, about this street. The road out in front of our home washed out, July 17th A week before our daughter was born. Our daughter will be two this July 30th and oui t>Lieeu is still a wash out, I was always under the impression your city council was in office to provide help and concern to the citiz^s of the village the> represent. I have however found this to^^alse information. I have gone through all the proper channels as advised by the Planning commission, and the city council members and the public work.s dept. However the road in front of my ^cme ntinues to wash away with every rain storm. Mr Gerhardso as informed me the road has not changed in those two years, however my viedo tapes and pictures show it diffently has and Srarrnow"in‘^?hrbusiest season for our club members use this street as a short cut . I feel this road in its present state can no ouburworks irJhlX: cloL the road completely until work gets underway. I would appreciate some action to this letter as I have recieved no help what so ever from the village of Oroi ^ as to date. I have^documented all my conversations with the vane' indiviuals at the city and f Uk^^ "'"““e^havXen Lre ?‘’!^eran‘rL^Lr*piyifg%it^ens deserve this matter taken care of. I am sorry for yon ««i for myself and my neighbors that this matter has not been given the attention it has required. Sincerely, *-'^fxQSCL.(3- Mrs. Leesa Anderson 62189.1 O TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato DATE: June 21, 1989 council MEETING JUN 2 S 1989 cmr OF ORONO SUBJECT: Government Finance Officers Association - Certificate of Achievement Presentation o ATTACHMENT: A. GFOA Certificate of Achievement ISSUE - Receipt by the Mayor on behalf of the City of the Government Finance Officers Association's certificate. INTRODUCTION - Mr. Fred Christiansen, the Finance Director for the City of Maple Grove as the representative for the State Chapter of the Government Finance Officers Association will be available to make the presentation to the City for its first certificate of achievement. RECOMMENDATION - No official action need be taken. cc: Fred Christiansen, City of Maple Grove Tom Kuehn, Finance Director O MIHDTBS OF THE RB6UIAR ORONO COUNCIL NBETI1IG HELD JUNE 12, 1989 ATTENDANCE 7:00 P.M. The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Grabek, CounciImembers Goetten, Nettles, Peterson and Callahan. The following represented the City staff: Acting City Administrator Gerhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron, City Engineer Cook, City Attorney Barrett, and City Recorder Scheffler. CONSENT AGENDA* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Nettles, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays*0, Motion passed. APPROVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Nettles, to approve the Minutijs of the May 22, 1989 Regular Council Meeting. Motion, Ayes«5, Nays«0, Motion passed. APPROVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Nettles, to approve the Minutes of the Reconvened Board of Review Meeting of May 24, 1989. Motion, Ayes»5, Nays«0, Motion passed. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT Mr. Eugene Strommen was present to update the Council and Mayor Grabek regarding the Eurasian Milfoil project. Funding for the milfoil project has reached its goal, with $168,000.00 being contributed. The harvesting equipment is due to arrive within a week. The harvesters are unique in that it is propeller driven. They will cut a swath 15* wide and will pull the weeds into a center platform that has a 3 ton capacity. The DNR is limiting the amount of weed that the LMCD can harvest. Mayor Grabek questioned why that was so. Mr. Strommen explained that the DNR is concerned that harvesting the milfoil may upset the aquatic balance of the lake. If this were to happen, algae would grow. Mayor Grabek asked why cutting was more effective than using chemicals to eradicate the weed? Mr. Strommen replied that the weed, and consequently the chemicals, would remain in the lake, once the weed died. He also noted that cutting would not spread the weed any more than it would be capable of doing on its own through propagation. Mr. Strommen also reported on the status of the Comprehensive Plan. He said that the Shoreline Management portion of the plan was currently being printed and would be ready for review shortly. Mayor Grabek expressed his concern regarding the possibility of Orono loosing jurisdiction over shoreline regulations. CounclImember Goetten commented that Orono has always been very strict in regard to such regulations and she did not wish to see any of the regulations relaxed. 26 1989 ’^OFimOHo MIMUTES OP THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OP JUNE 12, 1989 LNCD REPORT CONTINUTED Zoning Administrator Mabusth interjected that the LMCD concurred with Orono's tough stand on shoreline development. As a final note, Mr. Strommen informed the Council that the LMCD would be waiving the need for residents to obtain a dock extension permit. He said the LMCD would monitor dock extensions to insure that they were done in a safe, reasonable manner, but no permit would be necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE Planning Commission Representative, Sarah Moos was present, but had no comments at this time. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: #1326 WATZATA COUNTRY CLUB 200 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUBDIVISION-PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL RESOLUTION Mr. John Downey, of the Wayzata Country Club, the applicant, Ronald Lauer, and Mr. Larry Berg, attorney for the Wayzata Country Club, were present for this matter. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron provided a brief summary and update regarding this application for a subdivision. He noted that the Planning Commission had voted 2- 4 to approve this subdivision and had been concerned about the point of access for Mr. Lauer's property. Gaffron said that Mr. Lauer would require a lot width variance and a variance for lack of frontage on a public roadway. He said that staff is recommending approval. CounciImember Goetten asked about a pending agreement between Mr. Lauer and Mr. Leo Hauser regarding access. Gaffron clarified that at the May 15, 1989 Planning Commission Meeting, Mr. Hauser proposed allowing Mr. Lauer to access his new subdivision via a portion of Mr. Hauser's property. Since that time, however, Mr. Lauer felt that was not the best way to proceed. CounciImember Callahan relayed his concerns about the safety of the existing private driveway that serves the houses in that area. He said that the road was extremely narrow and he had experienced difficulty when meeting another vehicle. Mr. Lauer expressed his concerns for Mr. Hauser's proposal, saying that placing the access point in such a location would create a sight distance problem, especially in the winter. Gaffron depicted the various options available for accessing MINUTBS OP THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OP JUNE 12» 1989 ZONING PILE #1326“WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB CONTINUED Mr. Lauer's property. Mr. Berg addressed the Council and Mayor Grabek, and said that access through Mr. Hauser's property would create a steep driveway to Mr. Lauer's home. He added that Mr. Lauer would require additional variances if he abandoned his original proposal, which required only two variances. He said that Mr. Lauer would be willing to buffer his driveway from Mr. Hauser's property. Mr. Hauser disagreed with Mr. Lauer's proposal and believed it would be far more dangerous to create another access onto the existing private drive. He said there had already been a couple of accidents and many near misses involving vehicles trying to access onto North Ferndale. This was due to excessive foliage that hindered sight distances. Mrs. Hauser questioned the City's standard widths for public roads w*nd private drives. City Engineer Cook said that public roads were to be 24', a private drive would be about 12' noting that the City does not set a minimum standard for private driveways. Cook noted that Gaffron's option involving s cul-de- sac accessing directly onto North Ferndaie would be the most sensible option. Mr. A1 Greig reiterated the concerns he h-d regarding the proposed retention pond and berm. He believed tnat the retention pond would create more drainage problems. City Engineer Cook addressed Mr. Greig's concerns. CounciImember Goetten questioned whether the 4" pipe would be suffirient to drain the water. Cook responded that it would be sntticient to drain the pond and prevent excessive runoff from the Chevy Chase properties. Mr. Berg interjected that if it were the residents' concensus, his client would omit the retention pond. Mayor Grabek expressed his cone =irns for the serious issues involved with this subdivision. He said it was Mr. Lauer's responsibility to protect the neighbors from runoff created by the development of his property, and that the applicant had addressed those concerns, but the access issues required further consideration. It was moved by Counci 1member Callahan, seconded by Counci Imember Nettles, to table this item. Motion, Ayes*S*, Nays*0, Motion passed. #1391 TERRY SADLER 1395 BALDUR PARK ROAD CUPAARIANCE RESOLUTION Mr. Sadler was present for this matter. Assist.int Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that Mr. Sadler was requesting a con ..ional use permit MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 12, 1989 ZONING FILE #1391-'SADLER CONTINUED and variances for the purpose of constructing a retaining wall. The City Engineer has reviewed this application and recommended that the retaining wall extend to a point 80* from the lakeshore at full height and then taper to the ground in the next 10* to a point 70* from the shoreline. Cook felt this revisi m to the applicant's proposal would be more in keeping with ♦ < City's regulations concerning filling and grading within cjf the lake. Mr. Sadler stated that the City Engineer's proposal f^ould not alleviate the sloped area, and mowing or otherwise maintaining that area would be very difficult. He also stated that the revised plan would not limit moff from the slope onto his neighbor's property. CounciImember Callahan stated that he disliked the proposal allowing 5* of retaining wall to encroach into the 0-75* zone. He also felt that placement of the wall so close to the shared lot line, could create future problems between the property owners. CounciImember Goetten concurred with Callahan. It was moved by CounciImember Callahan, seconded by CounciImember Goetten, to deny application #1391, and direct staff to draft a denial resolution. Motion, Ayes«5, Nays*»0, Motion passed. #1397 ART CENTER OF MINNESOTA 2180/2240 NORTH SHORE DRIVE LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT RESOLUTION #2639 Ms. Michelle Prahm was present. Executive Director of the Art Center. as was Ms. Ann Stover, Zoning Administrator Mabusth informed the Council and Mayor Grabek that the Art Center was presenting a Quit Claim Deed that would provide the County with a 33* right-of-way. All other aspects of this metes and bounds subdivision have been met. The tennis court will now meet the required 10* setback. A total of 62 parking stalls will be provided. Mabusth said that she had received a request from the Art Center to waive the requirement of a iletter of credit. Ms. Frahm explained that in light of no new development actually occurring with this subdivision application, that a letter of credit should not be a requirement. Ms. Stover added that the required screening, lighting and parking would be achieved with minimal expense. Mayor Grabek expressed his preference to have some form of letter of credit. Ms. Frahm suggested that the Art Center be required to place a certain sum in an escrow account in lieu of a letter of credit. CounciImember Callahan indicated that he would not rhject to that. Mayor Grabek suggested that the sum of $5,000.00 be escrowed. MIMUTBS OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 12, 1989 ZONING FILE 11397-ART CENTER OF MINNESOTA CONTINUED It was jioved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2639, approving the lot line rearrangement for the Art Center of Minnesota, and requiring the Art Center to place an appropriate sum in escrow In lieu of a letter of credit. Motion, Ayes*5, ‘^ ys*0. Motion passed. #1401 JOHN FIEBBLKORH 2730/2740 SHADYWOOD ROAD LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT FINAL APPROVAL RESOLUTION 12640(a), #2640(b) Mr. Piebelkorn was present for this matter. There were no expressed concerns on behalf of the Council, nor the applicant. It was moved by CounciImember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to adopt Resolution #2640(a) and 12640(b), approving the lot line rearrangement and variance for John Fiebelkorn. Motion, Ayes*=5, Nays=»0, Motion passed. #1402 JOHN LEHMEYER 320 CRSSTVIBW AVENUE VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2641 Mr. Lehmeyer was present for this matter and indicated that he had no questions ol objections. There was no further discussion on behalf of the Council. It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2641, approving the rear setback and structure-to-structure variance for John Lehmeyer. Motion, Ayes«5, Nays*0, Motion passed. #1403 3205, 3215, 3255 AND 3265 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD CUP/VARIANCE RESOLUTIONS #2642, #2643, #2644 Mr. and Mrs. Schupp, Ms. Wolfe and Mr. Erger »»ere present for this matter. Zoning Administrator Mabusth adviaed the Council that the Resolutions would be amended to omit the language pertaining **o the requirement of a building permit for installation of retaining walls. There were no further comments or questions on behalf of the applicants, nor the Council. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to adopt Resolutions #2642, #2643, #2644, approving the conditional use permit and variance for Erger, Wolfe, Schupp and Anderson. Motion, Ayes®5, Nays»0, Motion passed. MINUTES OF THE OROHO COUNCIL MEETING OF ^UNE 12, 1989 #1404 JOHN NIKLBTHUN/HAROLD HADG 1385 CHERRY PLACE VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2645 The applicants were not present for this matter. The Council expressed no concerns regarding this application for a lot area variance. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImerober Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2645, approving the lot area variance in order to construct a single family residence. Motion, Ayes*5, Nays»0, Motion passed. #1406 DENNIS KUMLIN 2665 FOX STREET PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #2646 Mr. Kumlin was present for this matter and indicated that he understood and had no objections to the proposed Resolution. There were no concerns on behalf of the Council. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImcmber Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2646, approving the preliminary subdivision for Dennis Kumlin. Motion, Ayes*=5, Nays*0, Motion passed. #14)7 LEOPOLD HAUSER 475 FERNDALB ROAD NORTH SUBDIVISION REPLIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL Mr. and Mrs. Hauser were present for this matter. CounciImerober Callahan suggested that this application be tabled due to the need to further examinine the issue of access location for the Wayzata Count.ry Club's application. It was moved by CounciImember Callahan, seconded by Mayor Grabek, to table this application. Motion, Ayes«5, Nays“0, Motion passed. #1408 SMITH BAY MARINA 1955 SHORELINE DRIVE RENEWAL VARIANCES P.ESOLUTION #2648* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Nettles, to adopt Resolution #2648, renewing the variances and approving the commercial site plan for the Smith Bay Marina. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays«0, Motion passed. MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OP JUNE 12, I'JSS #1409 JANN/RENEE OLSTEN 3090 PARVIEW CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION #2647 Mr. Olsten was present for this matter. There wj*;s no request for further discussion on behalf of the applicant nor the Council. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2647, approving the conditional use permit for Jann and Renee Olr:en. Motion, Ayes=5, Naya»0# Motion passed. #1410 RON AND JULIE PRINBAS 1980 HERITAGE DRIVE VARIANCE Mr. and Mrs. Prineas were present for this matter, as was their Realtor, Carol LaQuay, and their surveyor, Mr. Cardarclle, Assistant Planninq and Zoning Administrator Gaffron informed the Council of the major issues involved with this application. At the May 15, 1989 Planning Commission Meeting, access became thisissi.e of concern. The applicants are proposing access to the non-homestead parcel directly off of County Road 15. They obtained a letter from Mr. David Zetterstrom of Hennepin County indicating that the Cou»^ty had no objections to such a proposal. Mr. and Mrs. Robert tierna, neighboring property owners, expressed their conce.'. t. for safety should a new access onto County Road 15 be created. The Planning Commission suggested that the applicantsyexplore the possibility of sharing Mr. and Mrs. Stierna' driveway. Mr. and Mrs. Stierna had indicated that could be an option, in addition the option of accessing the property from the rear using an existing easement. Mr. Stierna said that he had determined that sharing a driveway would not be beneficial. He briefly explained the easement that was reflected on his certificate of title. Ms. LaQuay advised the Council on the history of the easement to which Mr. Stierna referred. She said that it had since been extinguished as it was no longer necessary once Heritage Drive was constructed. CounciImember Goetten said that she disliked the proposed location of the driveway. Councilmember Nettles concurred and suggested that the driveway be configured away from the Stierna’s property line. Gaffron said that locating the driveway further north elsewhere could interfere with the front alternate drainfield site. Gaffron suggested that a third site to the rear of the property be tested for mound system capabilities. If the site is suitable, the alternate site to the front of the property could be eliminated. This would allow for the driveway to be located more to the center of the parcel, and would also provide a slight increase in the size or the building envelope. MINUTES OP THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OP JUNE 12, 1989 ZONING PILE 11410-PRINEAS CONTINUED CounciImember Callahan questioned whether a lot line rearrangement had been considered by the applicants? Gaffron replied that the applicants were aware of such an option^ but preferred to proceed with this plan. It was moved by CounciImember Callahan, seconded by Mayor Grabek, to table this application until the June 26, 1989 Council Meeting in order to allow the applicants to test for a third septic system location. Mr. Prineas indicated that he preferred not to have this matter continue any longer. CounciImembers Goetten, Nettles and Mayor Grabek indicated that they could not vote to approve the current proposal. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=0, Motion passed. ENGINEER'S REPORT LIVINGSTON AVENUE DRAINAGE Ms. Karen Cuff was present for this matter and distributed information pertaining to testing for possible contaminants located on their property. She explained that there would be a cost between $700 and $1500.00 to have the testing done if no contaminants were found to exist in dangerous levels. She questioned whether the City had any responsibility in this regard Mayor Grabek responded that the City of Orono had no such responsibility. CounciImember Goetten added that a precedent would be set if the City were to pay to have soil testing done on her private property. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Nettles, to agree that Ms. Cuff proceed with soil testing at no cost to the City of Orono. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=0, Motion passed. Ms. Cuff expressed her concern involving liability on her behalf should an above ground drainage system be used and contaminants are found downstream from her. CounciImember Callahan said that a Public Hearing to obtain input from regarding storm sewer installation. Gerhardson noted that Ms. Cuff had number of signatures on a petition to the City could proceed with neighboring property owners Acting City Administrator not obtained the required warrant a Public Hearing. It was moved by CounciImember Callahan, seconded by Mayor Grabek, to table this item until the required number of signatures are obtained on a petition. Motion, Ayes«5, Nays*0, Motion passed. 1989 SEAL COAT BID AWARD It was moved by Counci Imember Goette.i, seconded by CounciImember Nettles, to accept Allied Blacktop's bid of $68,200.40. Motion, Ayes«5, Nays«=0, Motion passed. MIMUTBS OP THE ORONO CODNCJL MEETING OP JUNE 12, 1989 MAYOR/CODNCIL REPORT: CITY ADMINISTRATOR TERMS OP CONTRACT CounciImember Goetten said that she agreed with paragraphs A and B, but disagreed with paragraph C She felt that the City Administrator should be required to give more than 45 days notice of resigning. CounciImember Peterson concurred with Goetten. After a brief discussion. Mayor Grabek agreed to require 60 days notice of resignation. CounciImember Callahan questioned whether it was appropriate to provide the City Administrator with 3 months salary for involuntary termination. In his opinion, even though termination may not occur due to a criminal violation, any behavior leading to termination should not be awarded with 3 months severance pay. Mayor Grabek explained to Callahan that severance pay was part of the negoiated contract and was a common practice for executives. CounciImember Goetten asked Mayor Grabek whether it would be possible to divide the motion into two sections. She said due to the fact that she voted against the additional .5% raise for the City employees, she felt the need to be consistent. However, she had no objections to a 3% increase, 60 days notice and the remaining terms of the Contract. CounciImember Peterson concurred. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Nettles, to accept the terms of the City Administrator's Contract as outlined in the proposed Appendix "D" and a 3.5% salary increase, with t-.a exception that 60 days notice of resignation be given. Motion, Ayes«3, Goetten, Peterson, Nay, Motion passed. SUBCOMMITTEE MEMBERS-ORAL STATUS REPORTS: J. DIANN GOETTEN-LAKE ACCESS - None ALAN NETTLES-LAKE USE - None JEANNE MABUSTH-ONSHORE RELATED FACILITIES - None ORONO CENTENNIAL Mayor Grabek said that Orono would be celebrating its 100th anniversary. He proposed celebrating the centennial by having a ball at the Lafayette Club and encouraging the construction of parade floats. Additionally, a Medina resident, Mr. Jim Roehl, will be writing a book on the history of Orono. Mayor Grabek requested approval from the Council to send a letter to Orono residents seeking contributions for these activities. He said that he had contacted the Western Hennepin County Pioneers Museum and they have agreed to be the established foundation to which donations can be sent. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Peterson, to send a letter to the residents of Orono apprising them of the planned celebration and requesting donations. Motion, Ayes*5, Nays-0, Motion passed. MINUTES OF THE OROMO COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 12, 1989 CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT: FACILITY SITE TOXJl\ ARRANGEMENT The Council agreed to set Thursday, June 29, 1989 as the date to tour and review the Mendota Heights, Savage, and Champ 1 in public works, police and administration facilities and the South Lake Minnetonka Police facility. EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION PROGRAM Acting City Administrator Gerhardson informed the Council and Mayor Grabek that the City wished to initiate an employee recognition program for length of service. This being an informational item, ther#^ wac no motion. CHANGES IN MINNESOTA LIQUOR STATUTE This was an information item to update the Council and Mayor Grabek on the recent changes in Minnesota Liquor Statutes. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Nettles, to table this matter tothe June 26, 1989 Council Meeting. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays*0, Motion passed. HIGHWAY 12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES It was moved by CounciImember Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to send a letter to Mr. Bruce thanking him for his concerns and direct staff to send a letter to MNDOT District 5 to request the review of goals and objectives by the public be a step as part of the feasibility study. Motion, Ayes“5, Nays=0, Motion passed. CITY ADMINISTRATOR DRAFT 89-90 GOAL SETTING It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to table this item until the June 26, 1989 Council Meeting. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays«0, Motion passed. FACSIMILE MACHINE* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to approve the purchase of the rarris/3M 2250 Facsimile Machine for $2,297.00, which does not include a maintenance agreement. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays«0, Motion passed. TRANSFER OF FUNDS M.S.A. CONSTRUCTION FUND TO PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT REVOLVING FUND* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to transfer $190,000 from the Municipal State Aid Construction Fund to the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund as reimbursement for monies expended for the County Road 15 street improvement project in the Navarre area. Motion, Ayes«5, Nays**0, Motion passed. 1990 PRELIMINARY BUDGET GUILELINES* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to accept the information and present their directions to staff and table the item for future discussion. MINUTES OP THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OP JUNE 12, 1989 Motion, Ayes-5, Nays«0, Motion passed. ADMINISTRATOR'S INPORMATION It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Nettles, to accept the City Administrator's Information regarding: 1950 Shoreline Drive; 1972 Shadywood Road; Bicycle Race; Legislative Summary-Senator Gen Olson's Letter; 4555 Wayzata Boulevard/Train Accident; Summary of Receipts and Disbursements-Apri 1 Year to Date and Electronic Funds Transfers. Motion, Ayes»5, Nays=0, Motion passed. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: There was no report from City Attorney Barrett. LICENSES* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Nettles, to approve the following licenses: Garbage & Refuse Collector: Septic System Installer; Baldy Sanitation, Inc. 5906 Henry Street Maple Plain Quickway Excavating Co Route 3, Box 3 Rockford, MN Hayes Excavating Route 1, Box 202 Montrose, MN Motion, Ayes=5, Nays*0, Motion passed. bills * It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Nettles, to approve payment of the All Funds Accounts. Motion, Ayes*=5, Nays*0, Motion passed. ADJOURNMENT 10:15 P.M. It was moved by CounciImember Nettles, seconded by CounciImember Nettles, to adjourn the Regular Council Meeting at 10:15 p.m. Motion, Aves=5, Nays«0, Motion passed. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor To: Prcan: Date: Subject: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson COUNCIL MEETING JUN 2S 1989 CITY OF ORONO c/ Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator June 23f 1989 #1326 Ronald Lauer/Wayzata Country Club, 200 Wayzata Boulevard - Preliminary Subdivision - Second Review List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Discussion ~ Notice of Council Action of 6/23/89 Staff Sketch of Combined Subdivision Proposal as Described by Mr. Hauser Letter from Albert Greig Letter to Mr. Greig from Sunde Engineering Memo of 6/8/89 This item was tabled at your June 12th meeting pending further discussions between Mr. Lauer and Mr. Hauser regarding a combination of the two subdivisions. As of this writing, Mr. Hauser has phoned to indicate that he and Mr* Lauer have reached a tentative agreement on a conceptual layout, which they will be proposing at Monday nights meeting. Based on Mr. Hauser's verbal description, staff has sketched that proposal. As of this writing, Mr. Lauer has not confirmed to staff his agreement with this proposal. The second issue with this subdivision proposal is the effect of the proposed run-off detention basin on the Chevy Chase property owners. Mr. Greig, who lives directly south of the proposed basin, has submitted a letter and a letter from his consulting engineer regarding the effects of this detention basin. These letters have been forwarded to City Engineer Glenn Cook for review and comment. Presuming that a conceptual plan is presented at Monday nights meeting. Council would have the following options: 1. Give conceptual approval for the proposal, directing applicants to work with staff to finalize boundaries, staff to draft a resolution for preliminary plat approval for your July 10th meeting. 2. Refer the matter back to Planning Commission for further review. 3. Other. US. June 23, 1989 Page 2 of 2 Also, Council should address the following Issues in whatever action is taken: 1. Is the detention basin required? 2. II* the conceptual proposal is approved, shall there be one access with three separate driveways, or will certain of the lov.s be allo\:ed a separate driveway curb cut? 3. Would the Council prefer to see this conceptual proposal viewed as two separate but adjacent subdivisions, or as a single subdivision encompassing all of the properties in question? Staff would recommend the latter for sake of clarity; however, note that the applicants would have to choose which surveyor would prepare the plat drawings. APPLICATION NO-JL326 CITY OF ORONO P 0- Box 66 Crystal Bayr MN 55323 473-7357 NOTICE OP COUNCIL ACTION Date of Notice: 6/23/89 TO:Ronald Lauer 80 Gideons Point Road Tonka Bay, MN 55331 COPIES: Wayzata Country Club P.O. Box 151 Wayzata, MN 55391 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Subdivision DATE OF MEETING: 6/12/89 VOTE: 5 For 0 Against COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION: Tabled pending further discussions between applicant and Mr- Hauser (Application #1407) regarding a combined subdivision to create a shared access. If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Recorder or City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council- ^s''0uTU>T(frn4ee) fax>¥< CoNc^r- C/^eo3^ AS 2>g5ce(&e^ ^7 jMiC. HA/S€1^ V __ <^fAfF S^^^TOti ~ r,..J--.-..^^r_;—. — J- - •"■ •r" • •; .', -j’.' . I'"-. ' " ;; •••• • 5»' . j ••• .■.■^•- •, •• • • .-•• ! • V • • . ’J- . . "1 i’-f-r ■.. • ,.-r-. ,ri;^KVv3-:-:-vyr, .■>-^vv. ■■ ■■ - - .....n-yi-^ I Albert C. Greig 137 Chevy Chase Drive Wayzata MN 55391 June 21, 1989 iwc.j2^7r yUf-^^ /i4S;c6iA>, ^v^#cx t-r^ "^**T_ Attached is a report from Mr. Gerald Sunde, Professional Engineer, concerning the proposed water retention area adjacent to the rear property line of lots # 19 and # 20 in Hilloway Manor. Please note that the report confirms the statements I made at the Orono Council meeting on June 12, 1989. Those statements were; 1 “ the water could overflow the berm and run into lots # 19 and # 20 from the west to the east, a distance of about 225 feet of which 160 feet would be on my property 2 - the water retained in the retention area could affect the water table and cause a water problem in my basement. The vertical distance from my basement floor is as follows: a) to bottom of drain pipe - 7.4' approx. b) to overflow on weir - 10.3* approx. c) to top of berm - 11.8' approx. My house is 100' from the rear property line. Therefore the distance from the house to the water is about 130' at the 974' elevation contour Inside the area. If this water retention plan is approved, I would like to know and have it confirmed in damage to my yard and to consist of expenses to floor and a sump pump, installa^ion. writing who will be liable for any water my house. Damage to the house could install a drain field under the concrete plus loss of value because of such Also, I would like to know whose responsibility it will be to keep the 4* pipe clear of obstructions that would hinder or eliminate the flow of water. The Planning Commission stated at one point that the retention area would be put under an easement end that the city would do the work, if not done by the property owner and charge the expense to the owner Would this be so? page 2 With all due respect to the city engineering department, if the 4" pipe (on private property yet) is maintained like my neighbors driveway culvert (installed by the city) and a street culvert about 12C9' from my driveway, it will soon be clogged up and du no draining at all. This is why I am concerned about water overflowing the berm. I trust the Council members will take the attached report with which the city engineer concurred on the effect on the water table and my personal commentc into consideration when reaching a decision on this matter. I would also like to mention that, at our age, either my wife or I could put our property up for sale at any time. As a result we do not want anything to happen that would reduce the value of our property. Sincerely, Albert C. Greig enclosure SUNDE ENGINEERING, INC. GERALD M. SUNDE, Consulting Engineer 9001 East Bloomington Frwy • Bloomington. MN 55420 • (612) 661-3344 June 20, 1989 MR. AL 6REIG 137 Chevy Chase Drive Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Dear Mr. Greig: This letter summarizes our field visit to your home in Orono, Minnesota and »• ;iew of the plans for drainage to the west of your site. Our understanding of the potential problems are as follows: The Wayzata Country Club desires to sell off a parcel located immediately to the west of your house for the construction of a single family residence. As part of that development, they are intending to make some corrections to the surface water drainage system. These include building a small storm water storage pond located just west of your property line. Our comments on the proposed plans are: 1. You indicated that one of the . aasons for installing tue ponding area and making the drainage plan corrections was it was felt that construction of the single family home on the large lot would increase the runoff. Water presently runs easterly parallel to your rear lot line and the . between houses to the east of your site and to Chevy Chase Drive. The water does not now run across your property. It is very doubtful whether the runc*ff amounts will be increased for the design storm events because of construction of one house on the large lot. This is because the critical runoff events in the area are the snow melt events. For snow melt events the ground surface is normally frozen and there is not much difference between runoff from pa;ed or surfaced areas. Therefore, the drainage area should have similar amounts of runoff in either case. 2. Also, we measured the area that would be impervious (hard surfaced) with the proposed design of the property. It is less than lyX of the total lot area. This is a very small amount of impervious for a r* ^ ntial area and approximates conditions in rural areas. Therefore, we feel for at least the design storm events, there will be little if any increased runoff due to the construction of one house. Mr. A1 Greig Page 2 June 20, 1989 You indicated that the developer intends to install the ponding area to decrease the rate of runoff through the houses on Chevy Chase Drive. Again, this runoff does not pass through your lot but rather your neighbors. Because there will be little increase in peak flow due to the proposed new house, we feel the only justification for the ponding area as shown on the plans is to remedy an existing poor drainage condition. Apparently this existing problem drainage comes form the golf course itself and not from the area of the house. The pond, if functioning properly, would serve to decrease the rate of flow of water between the houses of your neighbors. However, again it will not affect your lot in terms of runoff. The ponding area as proposed would appear to have a normal water elevation higher than your basement level. While it is not clear whether such a pond would affect groundwater tables in the area, the distance to your house is less than 150 feet and the addition of a ponding area with long term standing water could potentially raise the water table or provide a seepage source for water to reach your basement. The proximity of the pond to your house increases the possibility of groundwater problems in your basement. The design of the pond in particular may cause a problem as the outlet for the pond is only a 4" pipe. Pipe outlets this sm^ 3re easily plugged sometimes by something as simple as a pop can. The nor. standard of design for ponds in the woods would not be to use sue'- a small outle. Based on the results of our review, we feel the ponding area as proposed, north of your property does absolutely no good in terms of improving the surface water conditions on your property and it may result in higher groundwater levels and water in your basement. We think it would better for you if they never built the pond but just left the land the way it is. If the golf course is creating a surface water problem, the club should build a pond further to the north on the golf course property itself rather than right on the property line adjacent to your lot. That location for a pond increases a possible water impact and also results in cutting down all the trees next to your lot. It would be better, in terms of your property, if they just built the new house and didn't fool around with the pond. The impact on your neighbors in terms of surface water discharge is another matter. Please contact me if you have any questions or require further information. Yours truly. SUNpE ENGINEERING, INC. Gerald M. Sunde, P.E. Consulting Engineer GMS/sg •i * ■* TO: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson Proa: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: June 8, 1989 Subject: #1326 Ronald Lauer/Wayzata Country Club (Access off North Ferndale Road) Preliminary Plat Approval - Resolution Zoning District - RR-IB, single familyr 2 acre, unsewered Application - Split off a 2.8 acre buildable lot from a portion of the Country Club property. Access to be via existing private easement road. List of Bsdiibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit; H - Exhibit I - Exhibit J - Discussion - Draft Resolution - Preliminary Plat Approval Proposed Subdivision (survey & plat map) Final Grading/Drainage/Site Plan City Engineer Letter Dated 5/12/89 Planning Commission Minutes of 5/15/89, 4/17/89, 3/20/89, 10/17/88, 9/19/88 Planning Commission Action Notices of 5/23/89, 4/18/89, 3/27/89, 10/21/88, 9/21/88 Staff Memos of 5/11/89, 4/13/89, 3/16/89, 10/10/88, 9/14/88 Letters from City Engineer Dated 3/30/89, 3/21/89, 9/9/88 Letters from Neighboring Property Owners, Applicant, Applicant's Consultants; 1. Schoell & Madson 5/3/89 2. Schoell & Madson 4/7/89 3. Mertz (attorney for Lauer) 4/6/89 4. Maloney (attorney for Wayzata Country Club) 4/6/89 5. Hauser (475 No. Ferndale) 3/18/89 6. Wayzata Country Club/Downey 3/15/89, 3/23/89 7. Schoell 6 Madson 2/22/89 8. Simmone (139 Chevy Chase) 10/7/88 9. Hakanson-Anderson (septic plan) 8/2/88 Misc. Staff Memo Exhibits: 1. Application 2. Plat Map 3. Property Owners List 4. Area Topographic Compilation 5. Documentation from 1977 City Approval, Plat of "Fairway View" The applicant is Kona Id D. Lauer, to whom the property owner, Wayzata Country Club, is intending to sell a buildable 2.8 acre lot. Zoning File #1326 June 8, 1989 Page 2 of 4 This application was submitted in August 1988. Initial reviews by the Planning Commission were shaped to a great degree by the input from surrounding property owner, s, who ^'oiced great concern about the effect this development would have on their properties. Drainage was the prime concern voiced by residents of the Chevy Chase area to the south. The driveway access the private road, along with drainage, were the concerns of the neighbor immediately to the east, Hauser. DRAINAGE ISSUE - In response to the drainage concerns. Planning Commission required that the applicant submit a site plan showing existing and proposed grades. Also, after his review of this information, the City Engineer recommended that a drainage retention basin be constructed at the south end of the property, not only to mitigate any potential additional run-off due to development of this lot, but to retain run-off from a significant portion of the golf course property. The intent of the retention basin is to collect run-off and discharge it at a controlled rate, so that Chevy Chase properties will not get all the run-off at once. The City Engineer has reviewed the proposed retention basin and has made one change, raising the height of the berm by 1* and slightly increasing the temporary storage capacity. With this revision, he has recommended approval. ACCESS ISSUE —Regarding the access, there is an existing private road abutting the proposed building lot, that serves the plat of "Fairway View" approximately 1/4 mile to the west. This private road currently serves 8 existing residences. This road is not platted as an outlot for most of its length, but exists merely on easements. It was obviously the intent of the City when the plat of Fairway view was approved in 1977, that a private outlot road corridor should be dedicated as properties along the actual roadway subdivided. The City is requiring dedication of a 25* outlot for the southerly half of this private road along the north boundary of the entire Country Club parcel being subdivided. The proposed driveway leading from the private road to the proposed house has been a concern of property owner Hauser to the east, since it will run adjacent to his back yard. He is concerned about the removal of crees to create a driveway within the 60* corridor, and feels that such a driveway will reduce the value of his existing residence, which he is in the process of selling and subdividing to construct a new home further south (Application #1407). .‘ir Zoning File #1326 June 8, 1989 Page 3 of 4 Planning Comminsion Recoaoiendation - At their May 15th meeting, some Planning Commission members suggested that the driveway access location onto the private road is unsafe, hence that may be the reasoning for the 2-4 vote on a motion to approve the plat. One Planning Commissioner felt that this proposal should not be allowed unless the private road is upgraded, citing the City's reluctance in past similar situations to force upgrading of private roadways as showing limited foresight. Staff would not acessarlly disagree with that opinion, but would also note tht extreme difficulties in requiring multiple property owners to agree to granting road dedications and upgrading private roads that pre-exist current platting ordinances. The Planning Commission also indicated that if Lauer and the Country Club could come to an agreement with Hauser regarding combining their proposed subdivisions, giving Lauer direct access to North Ferndale Road through Hauser's property. Planning Commission would consider that in a favorable light. The applicants have not come to an agreement with Hauser, and at this point each party wishes to proceed with their developments separately. The Planning Commission's second motion on May 15th was to table. There being no second, the motion died. No further motions were presented, hence the application is moved forward to the City Council with somewhat clouded direction from the Planning Commission. Staff Recommendation - The applicants have provided all information requested by the Planning Commission, and have shown to the satisfaction of the staff and the City Engij?eer that this development will have no detrimental drainage impact on neighboring properties, and should actually alleviate some of the existing drainage problems. Additionally, applicant has stated his intent to disrupt as few trees as possible in creating driveway access that is safe and functional. Primary and alternate drainfield sites have been tested and approved for mound systems. There are two variances inherent in this proposal: 1. Lot width variance: Proposed 60' Required « 200' Variance * 140' 2. Variance for lack of frontage on a public roadway (this variance is granted for virtually every new subdivision of the City served by a private roads). Zoning File #1326 June 8r 1989 Page 4 of 4 Staff recommends approval of the above noted variances. Staff further recommends preliminary plat approval, finding that all other requirements for a subdivision in the RR-IB zone are met by this proposal. Absent any apparent preference by the applicants# staff recommends that the larger 11.2 acre parce"* be designated as Lot 1 and the new building site as Lot 2. The conditions of approval proposed within the failed Planning Commission recommendation motion# but which staff recommends for inclusion in the resolution for approval# are as follows: 1. Applicant shall construct the retention basin per the City Engineer's approval as a first condition to issuance of a building permit for a house on the property. This basin shall be completed at the time of initial foundation excavation on the property. Proper erosion controls shall be in place. The necessary drainage easement for this basin shall be shown in the final plat drawings. A drainage easement shall be granted over the retention basin. 2. Any changes to the house footprint for Lot 2 prior to issuance of the building permit will require a revised site grading plan which must be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of the building permit. 3. Dedication of 25* outlot corridor along the north side of Parcel 36-118-23 14 0010# for private roadway purposes# to be shown as Outlots A and B. 4. The road outlots shall be subject to an underlying road and utility easement granted to the City. 5. City to grant the 140* variance for lot width for Lot 2 and the inherent variance for lack of frontage on a public roadway for Lots 1 and 2. 6. The standard park fee of $300.00 for the new lots shall be paid as part of the "inal subdivision fees. 7. Stand?«rd drainage aid utilities easements shall be shown on the pla*^- drawings. The remaining dry buildable defined lot area after exclusion of the 0.35 acre retention pond drainage easement and 25* road outlot (+ .05 acre) is 2.4 acres# exceeding the 2.0 acre minimum requirement. A resolution for preliminary plat approval is attached for Council review. ■ V'*-* v; I • « To: From: Date: COONCIl MEETING JUK 2( 1989 Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson CITY OF ORONO Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator June 23, 1989 Subject: #1407 Leopold & Helen Hauser, 475 North Ferndale Rd - Preliminary Plat Approval - Second Review List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Discussion - Notice of Council Action Dated 6/23/89 Staff Sketch of Revised Proposal Based on Verbal Description by Hauser Memo & Exhibits of 6/9/89 This item was tabled at your June 12th meeting pending further discussions between the Hausers and Ron Lauer, who is developing the Wayzata Country Club parcel. As of this writing, Mr. Hauser has indicated that the two applicants have reached an agreement regarding a combination of the two proposals to create a shared access. Although no sketch has been submitted, Mr. Hauser indicates they will have one prepared for presentation at Monday's meeting. Staff has indicated on a rough sketch the proposal as described by Hauser. Staff's memo and recommendation of June 9th are also attached for further review. If Council determines that the proposal is appropriate, staff would recommend that Council direct staff to prepare a resolution granting preliminary approva.^ for the combined subdivision applications for your next meeting. (Your other option, if you reel it is necessary, would be referral to the Planning Commission.) CIW OF OI^BO H( Yl in P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 APPLICATION NO. 14B7 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION Date of Notice: 6/23/89 TO: Leopold & Helen Hauser 475 North Ferndale Road Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES: Meredith Howell Merrill Lynch Realty 315 East Lak i Street Wayzata, MN 55391 TYPE OP APPLICATION: Subdivision DATE OF MEETING: 6/12/89 VOTE: 5 For 0 Against COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION: Tabled pending further discussions between applicants Hauser and Lauer (Application #1326) regarding a shared acce»-^s. This item is scheduled for the Council meeting of June 26, 1989, meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Recorder or City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. <25 '^ouncr(fume^ fao¥^ f^itrHeitLf. ~ fiue^R-nes' ____________: -. - rr ^ r^—-7-:.—-; Leo^oto /MuseA Y7S ju Ae^. \A A . i -- (ZoNc&FT 2>esoe.(/B.e^ Hau £^ <EST^F SF&KH I i ri^l^^Hiv''-■'• . < ‘. •Hi.»* »t •♦ • '••! : , '.*•* ! u. I ' ‘ ■* ’ '•* ‘ ^ ^ ^ -■ ;V‘Til "liwiP ^ -r ■>»g . • .f •» ««’4* •. • - *:; -n rT^ •: ■ A— ■> ;. I I S't» ■j: ! ! .; I 4 i: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Date: Subject: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator June 9r 1989 #1407 Leopold & Helen Hauser, 475 North Ferndale Rd - Preliminary Plat Approval Zoning District - RR-IB, single family, unsewered Application - Request to divide off a 2 acre parcel from existing 5.5 acres, for construction of a new residence. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Letter from Applicant Regarding Driveway Location Request Exhibit B - Planning Commission Minutes of 5/15/89 Exhibit C - Notice of Planning Commission Action of 5/22/89 Exhibit D - Memo & Exhibits of 5/12/89 Discussion - Applicants own a 5.5 acre parcel (exclusive of right-of-way of North Ferndale Road), from which they request to divide a 2 acre building site to construct a new residence. This proposed division is adjacent to and immediately east of the proposed Wayzata Country Club subdivision. Mr. & Mrs. Hauser intend to sell their existing residence within proposed Lot 1 and construct a new residence on proposed Lot 2. Applicants' property contains the southerly half of a private easement road which serves the plat of Fairway View approximately 1/4 mile to the west, as well as 3 additional residences. As is the case with the adjacent Wayzata Country Club subdivision, staff is recommending that a 25* private road outlot be platted along the north boundary of Lot 1. The standard underlying road and utility easement would be required for this private road outlot. The outlot and road would remain in private ownership and continue to be privately maintained. Ownership of this outlot would logically stay with the owner of the adjacent proposed Lot 1. This outlot would be approximately 0.2 acres in area, the area of Lot 1 being decreased to approximately 3.3 acres. The existing residence on proposed Lot 1 will then be 64' from the north lot line. An alternate drainfield site has been tested and approved for the existing residence. Both primary and alternate drain- field sites have been tested and approved for the proposed building site. Lot 2. The City Engineer has reviewed the propose,*] plat and expressed recommendations regarding drainage and dri^ew.$y access. .1 5^' Zoning File #1407 June 8, 1989 Page 2 of 4 DRAINAGE ISSUE - Similar to the Wayzata Country Club proposal, this property contributes run-off to properties to the south. The City Engineer has recommended that a small detention basin be provided at the southwest corner of Lot 2, to collect run-off from the Hauser property and discharge it at a controlled rate. The Planning Commission recommendation included the condition that the detention basin be designed by applicants' engineer and reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to Council preliminary plat approval. In discussions with the applicants after the Planning Commission meeting of May 15th, this application was scheduled for the June 12th meeting anticipating a potential reconfiguration of the property by combining this subdivision with that of Wayzata Country Club. Such a proposal does not now appear to be forthcoming, however, specific isr?ues regarding the need for new roads etc., would have affected the parameters of design for the desired detention basin, hence a detention basin has not yet been designed. Council may wish to table this application pending submittal and approval of the detention basin design, or could go ahead with preliminary plat approval. Note also that the drainage easement for such a basin would be excluded from the 2 acre lot area, hence the proposed dividing line would have to move slightly northward,, perhaps 10-15 feet, to maintain the 2 acre minimumc DRIVEWAY ACCESS ISSUE - In his review of the site, the City Engineer has recommended that a shared driveway access serve both Lots 1 and ?. Such an access would most Icg.icaJly '•4* •? driveway a c c c«r point onto North Ferndale Road, which could be moved further scQth to avoid the need for an easement across Lot 1. From a consistent policy standpoint, it would be appropriate for these two lots to share one access curb cut. The applicants have submitted a sketch and a letter of request expressing their desire for a separate driveway located mid-way along the east line of Lot 2. Their reasons for such a request include privacy, topography and ease of access, maintenance concerns, and their hope to create the least disruption of the property. The proposed driveway would avoid conflict with the proposed drainfield sites. Note also that from a sight distance stand point, the proposed entrance is a very safe location, but does add one more access point that Fernd le traffic must contend with. Zoning File #1407 June 8r 1989 Page 3 of 4 Planning Commission Recommendation - On May 15, l: , the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the proposed plat with the following conditions: 1. Driveway access to ITorth Ferndale Road shall be via a shared driveway between Lots i and 2 or ^rom a new private road outlot if the Hauser and Wayzata Country Club subdivisions are combined. 2. A retention basin shall be conatruc zen per the City Engineer's recommendation within Lot 2. This basin shall be designed by applicant's engineer and reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to Council preliminary plat approval. The basin shall be constructed as part of the initial construction work on the property. A drainage easement shall be granted over the basin. (Note: proposed division line must move northward to maintain 2.0 acres Lot 2 exclusive of drainage easement.) 3. On the plat drawings, 33' of right-of-way for Nor^.n Ferndale Road shall be dedicated as public roadway. Additionally, a 25' private road ni.tiot along the north boundary of the property shall be shown on the plat for private road purposes. The standard road and utility easement shall be granted the outlot private roadway. 4. Lot 2 will be subject to a $200.00 park fee per the current fee schedule. 5. Applicant shall submit a site grading plan for the house prior to issuance of a building permit, which must be approved by the City Engineer, prior to issuance of the building permit. u. uLaiiJard Jrainag^ and piysementn shall be shown on the plat drawings. Staff Recommendation - Staff would recommend approval per the Planning Commission recommendation. The two remaining Issues to be considered by Council prior to adoption of a preliminary plat approval resolution are: 1. Should the retention basin design be submitted ^nd approved by the City Engineer prior to adoption of the preliminary plat approval resolution, or should such design be required prior to final plat approval? Zoning File #1407 June 8, 1989 Page 4 of 4 2. Determine whether a separate driveway access will be allowed for Lot 2. Note that if a separate access is not granted, applicants may ask Council to allow a shifting of the new division line slightly northward so that the existing driveway access is bisected by the division line, thereby avoiding an access easement between Lots 1 and 2. A resolution will be drafted for your next mee^ if Council so directs. W Leopold A. Hauser, III 475 North Ferndale Road Vayzata, MN 55391 473-1173 To: Orono City Council Re: Sub-division of our:icKI^ Helen and I would like our driveway to enter off Ferndale in the approximate center of our east/Ferndale lot line. This would avoid having to disrupt the current N.E. corner straight lot lines as pictured. Also we wouldn't have to cut down large full grown trees in thit N.E, corner of.the lot and the space between the current driveway and N.E. corner. As the elevation lines indicate, there is quite a slope off to the south from the current driveway. Sharing a rpllt driveway opening there would mean an uphill grade to the entrance. In the winter, snow melting in the iday would run off onto the south section and freeze up at night, causing us uphill slipping when exiting, etc. frou this new lot. This center driveway would also add privacy to both homes and. eleminate the hassle of coordinating two separate snow-plowing contractors during the winter. Such cekter entry onto Ferndale was considered to be safe 6y both Glen and Mike, when they were on location. Thank you in advance for considering this proposal. As 18 year residents and tax payers in Orono, we both appreciate you putting yourself ^in our shoes. Gratefully, s* • • »• - . > MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MAY 15# ItSi ZONING FILE #1406-KUMLIN CONTINUED if it was developed. Gaffron noted that there be through road only if the City or the property owners deemed it necessary* Gaffron said that there was no intent for a through road In the foreseeable future. Mr. Ray Jaques, owner of Lot 2 in the Trees to Be subdivision^ questioned what effect the future development of the larger eastern lot in the Trees to Be plat would have on the potential for the through road being constructed? Gaffron replied that there would be no effect. There were no further comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Cohen, seconded by Planning Commissioner Bellows, to recommend approval of the preliminary subdivision application. Cohen did express concern regarding access onto County Road 84. Motion, Ayes*6, Nays*0, Motion passed. #1407 LEOPOLD HADSER 475 FBRNDALE ROAD NORTH PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION CLASS II PUBLIC HEARING 8:40 P.M. TO 8:50 P-M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. and Mrs. Hauser were present for this public hearing, as was their realtor, Meredith Howell. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that Mr. Hauser was prt^posing to subdivide his 5.5 acres of property into 2 lots. The Hauser's residence is located on the proposed Lot 1 and would meet the required setbacks. Both primary and alternate septic sites . ave been determined for the proposed Lot 2. The applicant would prefer to have a separate driveway access to Ferndale Road. However, the City Engineer has recommended that the driveway be shared. He did indicate that sight distance would not be a problem if separate driveways were constructed. The plat would show a 33* right-of-way dedication for North Ferndale Road and the City would ask that a 25' private road outlot along the north end of the property be dedicated. The City Engineer has further recommended that a retention basin be designed for the southwest corner of Lot 2. Mr. Greig commented that he did not believe that Mr. Hauser's proposal would create a problem with drainage. Mrs. Hauser commented that the Keesling lot line was more contiguous with their property and that drainage would not affect Mr. Greig's property. Mr. Hauser asked if he and Mr. Lauer reach an agreement if he could take the width of the driveway from Lot 1 and add it to Lot 2? Kelley indicated that approval would be conditioned upon o. « F««™> C0»a«»0. 1... ^ from the public regardingThere were no ««'ther co«®en this matter and the public hearing wa ^ asked for clarification planning Commissioner ^ Kelley explained that the ““Vi' .11.. <«r ;Ki?: o' o""'* It »•• oovoo by'lojoj;'"”“U;K5n “”«pt’"5!l o< t». 'o '«“o.iot oo.-«io... I. „tl,...y .o=... 'O »oVOJo/"““ .«a"V.A*otV • dtl«««y ••'"ot -oo..* "« o' • P'OP I. » t.....loo 0..1O b. tot«™o.«. >« .oo.rt.oo. -«« to. City Engineer’e recomaiendetionB . 3. That 33' of road*^oStlS^ thertr?op'vr;;“br.ror prt?.“pf.' o-o ■«' 2 .»*12 “ •“■>ioo* “ “• $200.00. . 5. The tbe^building permit, proposed house on Lot 2 prior $. Standard drainage and utility easement, shall be shown on the plat map. „4.4iitv Kelley questioned whether the »tan^«a /^In.^e eaLment would include the retention pondj^ tion making that an *^^^tional 1 fiowage and t®ne®fvation to include the teq«ite®«“t tji^ t^^^ easement be taken for t . driveway would be preferredSSwell asked whether the shared drivwy access to the event Mr. *-“« ;^\*** replied that would be P'«*«7*d. Mr^ Lauer's property? plley P access may ^nterfer Bauser expressed “ia conc« expressed his confusion with existing trees. n of Hanson's motion. ®e"“®2regarding the intent of condition fi allow Mr. Hauser the clarified that it hi» j-n\*“^\®j; \i„a ,o the new driveway option : slightly ^driveway. Kelley explained thatcould IMS a.;cessed from the old d v^^^| ^yoid any additional the shared driveway would P ^ Motion, Ayes-6, Hays-O, curb cuts onto North Perndale Koao. Motion passed. cm OF OROHO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay# MN ZONIRG PILB RO. 1407 ROTICB OP PIAHRIRG CONMISSIOR ACTIOH 55323 473-7357 Date of Kotlce: 5/22/89 Leopold Hauser 475 Ferndale Rd R '•Vayzata, NR 55391 COPIES TO:Meredith Howell Merrill Lynch Realty 315 East Lake St Wayzatar MR 55391 TIPS OP APPLICATIOR: Subdivision DATE OP MBBTIR6: 5/15/89 VOTE: 6 For 0 Against Planning Cc^aisaicMi recr■^■enda the following: Approval subject to conditions noted below ROTES ARD SPECIAL CORDITIORS: w ^ ^ iX, DrlvHway access to Rorth Ferndale Road shall be via a shared driveway between Lots 1 and 2, or from a new private road out lot If the Hauser and Wayzata Country Club subdivisions are combined. 2. 3. A retention basin shall be constructed per the City Engineer's recommendation within Lot 2. This basin shall be designed by applicant's engineer and reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to Council preliminary plat approval. The basin shall be constructed as part of the initial construction work on the property. A Conservation and Flowage Easement shall be granted over the basin. On the plat drawings, 33* of right-of-way for Rorth Ferndale Road shall be dedicated as public roadway. Additionally, a 25' private road outlet along the north boundary of the property shall be shown on the plat for private road purposes. The standard road and utility easement shall be granted over the outlot private roadway. Lot 2 will be subject to a $200.00 park fee per the current fee schedule. Applicant shall submit a site grading plan for the house prior to issuance of a building permit, which must be approved by the City Engineer, prior to issuance of the building permit. Standard drainage and utility easements shall be shown on the plat drawings. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council Moi.day, June 12, 1989; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. It is City staff's understanding that Mr. Hauser and representatives of the Country Club intend to discuss options for combining the subdivisions for mutual benefit. If this occurs, resulting in a substantially revised layout, the proposal will likely be referred back to the Planning Commission for review. The next Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for Monday, June 19th at 7:00 p.m. Please contact staff no later than Monday, June 5th regarding your intentions. 4. 5. 6. Datet Subjactx Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commlsaion Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Michael P, Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator May 12, 1989 11407 Leopold 4 Helen Hauser, 475 North Ferndale Rd - Preliminary Subdivision - Public Bearing loning District - RR-IB Application - Split off a 2*acre lot to build a new residence. List of Bzhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Pertinent Pacts - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey/Preliminary Plat Drawing 1. This property is adjacent to and directly east of the Wayzata Country Club subdivision. 2. The entire property is 5.5 acres in area. Proposed Lot 1, with the existing house, is 3.5 acres. Lot 2, the proposed new lot, is 2.0 acres. 3. Septic Lystem testing indicates suitable sites for mound systems on the proposed new lot. Alternate site testing for the existing house found suitable soils for a trench-t^'pe system if the existing system ever needs to be replaced. 4. The proposed house site is centered in the north half of the proposed lot. The house will generally be uphill from the sewage treatment sites. There should be no problem locating a well on this site, due to the approximately 150* setback from the existing house's septic system. 5. The applicant would prefer to have a separate access point to Ferndale Road. City Engineer Glenn Cook has looked at the site and notes that, while a safe driveway access could be laeated almost anywhere along the east line of Lot 2, the City generally prefers to create shared driveways where possible. He is recommending a shared driveway. 6. On the plat, 33* of right-of-way should be dedicated for public roadway for North Ferndale Road. Zoning File #1407 Hay 12, 1989 Page 2 of 3 7* Additionally, as we are doing with the Hayzata County subdivision, a 25* private road outlot snould be dedicated on the plat for the private road along the north end of the property. This 25* outlot would provide a corridor for the southerly half of that existing road. The north lot line would then still be approximately be 65* from the existing house• 8. City Engineer Glenn Cook has walked the site of the new lot, and feels that site has drainage concerns similar to the Wayzata Country Club subdivision. Glenn is recommending that a retention basin be provided near the southwest corner of Lot 2, where a natural basin now exists. In order to allow drainage to leave the site at a controlled ratw. As in the Wayzata Country Club subdivision, the development of Lot 2 with a new house and driveway is not expected to significantly change the amount of drainage leaving the property, and construction of a retention basin will to a certain extent decrease the pre-existing drainage problems for the neighbors to the south. 9. Staff early on explored the possibility of serving both the Wayzata Country Club lot and this proposed lot via a new private road between Lots 1 and 2. Because this area is being developed to its densest potential development under current zoning standards, and because both new lots have access from either public or private roads, there seems to be no good reason to create such a short new road to serve just one or two residences. City codes would certainly not require such a road. Furthermore, creation of such r road would not be feasible without destroying the septic system sites for the Wayzata Country Club lot, and would impact the most appropriate building site for the Hauser lot. Based on these considerations, staff feels there is no good reason to further consider a new private road in this area. Discussion - Lots 1 and 2 both meet the required acreage and lot width standards of the RR-IB zoning district. Septic testing has found suitable drainfield sites. The City Engineer is addressing drainage concerns in his review of the proposal, and is recommending that applicant have his engineer design a retention basin based on minimum requirements to be determined by the City Engineer. New access roads are not necessary. Dedication for existing public and private roads is necessary as part of the platting process. The City is recommending that a shared driveway between Lots 1 and 2 be developed rather than a separate driveway for Lot 2. Zoning File #1407 Hay 12, 1989 Page 3 of 3 In general, this proposal appears to meet all requirements of the subdivision ordinance. Staff RecoMendation - Staff recommends approval of the proposed division subject to the following conditions: 1. Driveway access to North Ferndale Road shall be via a shared driveway between Lots 1 and 2. 2. A retention basin shall be constructed per the City Engineer's recommendation within Lot 2. Tills basin shall be designed by applicant's engineer and reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to Council preliminary plat approval. The basin shall be constructed as part of the initial construction work on the property. 3. On the plat drawings, 33' of right-of-way for North Ferndale Road shall be dedicated as public roadway. Additionally, a 25' private road outlet along the north boundary of the property shall be shown on the plat for private road purposes. The standard road and utility easement shall be granted over the outlet private roadway. 4. Lot 2 will be subject to a $200.00 park fee per the current fee schedule. 5. Applicant shall submit a site grading plan for the house prior to issuance of a building permit, which must be approved by the City Engineer, prior to issuance of the building permit. 6. Standard drainage and utility easements shall be shown on the plat drawings. In your recommendation. Planning Commission has the option to require that the retention basin be designed and approved by the City Engineer prior to your recommendation, or you could make a recommendation for approval subject to that plan being approved prior to preliminary plat review by the Council. In total impact of this development on neighboring properties, this proposal differs very little from the Wayzata Country Club situation. It is staff's opinion that the City has responded to concerns of the neighboring property owners adequately. W/V07 CITY OF OROHO * SDBDIVISIOH APPLXCATIOH PR0PERT7 LOCATIOH Site Address 475 Ferndalp Rnarl Nnrth Properly Identification Number (P.I.D.) 36-118»23-14~fl011 Please checJc one - Property xx abstract or ____ torrens? Attach legal description to application. APPLICAHT Name Meredith Howell Phone (home )3FFKE vw_. Phone (work) 473-3000 ^ Address ;315 East Lake Street______ OWNER (if different than applicant} Neune Leopold and Helen Hauser _____ City ^fay7ata Zip; cc^9 < Phone (home ) Address: Ferndale Road North (attach list if more than one) ______ Phone (work) City; Orono ^ tworK; EXISTING LAND OS^ Nuitber of Tax Parcels Development Size Present Use (check) s.so Acres Dry L2uid Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units i Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Zoning District RR 1-B PROPOSAL XXX Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) 1 8 7. '20 Existing Units New Units Total Units Units per g so Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ mHUIDM MilTBRlAL HECZSSART FOR 1. Completed Application Form 2. Preliminary Plat information on C#^i£ic4e of 3* .> Certified Property Owners List or owner^^Tlthin 350 * Tyou nma- ^ this list from Hennepin County Department of Fin2mce A-603 Govt 348-3271). 4. .^Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressad to each of the ^ names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). 5..,> As an addendum to this applicationr please attach a separate list of • ■ any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete• Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date 1. Payment of fees (park fees# filing fie, sewer and water assessments)."' 2. Signed certificate r>f survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. ^ 4. Easen^ints, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application i:< complete. Zoning Official' s Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FSBS Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Preliminary Review (Class I i II Subdivision) Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) Fina: Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) $150.00 250.00 300.00 + 20.0C/Lot 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all Information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Con^ssion and Council necess^^ to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fee^ established by ordinance. (SS^^ to ] tee^ est^J Signature A . ^ Applicant's Signature Owner's Date Date / / ' 7 ^ 7 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days oefore the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ■ ^ . ' I I V ' % ^' — 0 ^ f. t. lia-n-Air (3) C \V X S. IV 1/(;n X r 1a n (;S) Vi ti lor / iM •> b T n f \j 1 ^ KlAV « * MAfflOK •" : » 1291 i i 5“ ,., f £(33) 6 ill * t 'A .« j t f X 9 * (3«) *«f 1 130) * , T# ^ 1 ««•,r 1 CHEVT chase OP1 » ft*_ r m3 rs. 13 23^M 5^(6i * « («6> AA «». v.«* It» »»•-ngS M 6»w *v(tx u> •< . •• i If! « 4 (W ( M) ;‘#p.i*»' <* ■«t|(< C A- .•»«, (!3I . 1 13.') . h1 '^4. J TT • V’/X ^ ■»'/ »,,',,«>H‘'3 i.-ii V"’i»i V! -7 & sS isllisi mff!h;|.iSisi _s i m Msrsntu < SiS lif « S S { mIisISI M Z 58.3•H 141 < ^ ♦ J K M « yi t srduis *I5*3»S sixsSi M ^ -.5"« u S)$ iJUl •* Ml s||::§siiss M Z lllifi ^iiill i; SMs. Ki^i M K *^ > M «• a r SJai rl Z ^M> lA < S < S « > M?s.<gs l>o =ti: l*®s^nli% *r Ml« Im 4 >[Mii e > > o ^ 9tS22a!^ is S!s»4 Ml M « -I U9i:s» ?'|:i 'M O Ml ^ M « 2 M > S o a 8 M 2 .J 55u§wg 35-32 3-i»5* ^ £k23 M A' M « U <SaS.^5 SS.SS2 »! |!^ IHhiS^iai ‘ 1 **S2|•"S“5*89i:m s mis |Z ^ i*i«i |3» ili-h M w z 8 ^ B S « 2 w ^ SSmi SSs! ! S II i; iT HI *- p4 .1 Ml *s;83 iJF, 9fj=* • HI P « E3u8S |‘^S2iliii T^zll:i!isi ill!s!i!iiiS !I|S ■ e ® r* X 53g »S89 i i «S!«^•"nsj^a ill! IlSi S8m p4 Z HI 8^ K> > M M:l§s-< ilHsi iSil lIH €•: ®',e s*lf 8398^ °5tS3 imjh|M lA < ms:S8«iSs! i!il ilM i M* M W M 4 Iw ii o»"S82 # »« o 8 M a. iSif!il^ Cf # I I S n l\ iM 8 ^ S “a*i!-| 9%:m ia i iaalLs i5i:pf • ^ z ^ * 5"gsis^iss-,stn;::s: I I i O a*3 M o » z :i‘• u z•H « HI___ •H a < X aS^laS7 e M M ta a i i!il ilH Ifsl III a* aaa =|! 3 ~S«<58, SS-2!* ^ a 4 Xi 3«2iiM e X a < g p8 “S25« o a a « a IR*mMlI!S!sasil o8-S85<* o a a m a lh\ flf ^ LlJ Oil ^ lAJ s|.g3g li|i III s* M Is<i:i|i S o a 8 S ' ilt ICO/^ol O /^At^S€^ *f7S >U AO.. OAff i s-f-n rc-*<’€ -. /' 1l miciiiWBam JtiRr2S1989 CtTY OF ORONO PSOMs DJiTBt SUBJx Mayor Grabek and Council Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Planning Commission Members City Administrator Dernhardson Michael Gaffronr Asst. Planning 6 Zoning Administrator June 22, 1989 #1391 Terry Sadler, 1396 Baldur Park Road Variance/Conditi-)nal Use Permit-Resolution of Denial Diacussions^ June 12th Meeting, Council directed staff to draft a 75* setback zone. A resolution for denial is attached for Council review. Proposed Motiont Moved by ________seconded by ---------- , to ado^ Resolution % ___, denying variances and a conditional use permit for construction of retaining walls and placement of fill in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone at 1396 Baldur Park Road. Ayes____, Hays____. - w* ^ * A RBSOLUTION DENYING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2, Ai4D SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8, AND DENYING A CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT PER i;BCTION 10.03, SUBDIVISIONS 19 ft 20, PILE #1391 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Stave of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minn. Statutes 412 and 462, et. seq., the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted a Community Manageme it Plan and Zoning Regulations for the protection of the Public health, safety and general welfare; and WHEREAS, Terry Sadler (hereinafter the "applicant"), is the owner of property located at 1396 Baldur Park Road and legally described as follows: Lot 16, 3ALDUR PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota, (hereinafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") as follows; 1. For variances seeking approval of land alterations conducted within 0-75' of the lakeshore of Lake Minnetonka where no land alterations are allowed per Section 10.22, subdivision 2, and Section 10.55, subdivision 8; and 2. For a conditional use permit per Section 10.03, subdivision 19 and 20, for land alterations including placement of fill and construction of retaining walls within the 0-75* lakeshore setback zone; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Orono ha^ reviewed the application; the recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission, the comments of the City Engineer, the written statement submitted by the applicant's neighbor, and the comments and written statements of the applicant. Page 1 of 7 mm, TBBRBPORBt BB IT RBSOLVBD that the City Council of the City of Orono, hereby denies the application for placement of fill and construction of retaining walls in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone based upon one or more of the following findings of fact concerning this property: PI1IDI1I68 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1391. 2. The property is located in the LR-IC Lakeshore Residential Zoning District and contains approximately 0.30 acres in area. The LR-IC District requires 0.50 acres in area. 3. Applicant constructed a single family residence on the property in 1984, at which time grades around the residence were established. The applicant maintains that the grades established at the time the residence was constructed do not allow for ease of maintenance of the lawn in the area proposed for fill, and that placement of fill and construction of retaining walls as proposed will alleviate this problem. Applicant also maintains that the fill and retaining walls in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone are necessary to prevent drainage from flooding the neighboring property. 4. The applicant proposes a retaining wall along the side lot line to a point as close as 40' from the shoreline, with placement of fill as near as 30* to the shoreline. 5. The City Engineer reviewed the proposal and recommended that the retaining wall be constructed no closer than 70' from the shoreline, and that fill placement be limited to only that necessary to fill behind the wall and such fill being placed no closer than 45' to the shoreline. 6. On May 15, 1969, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the proposal and recommended approval subject to the conditions recommended by ^,he City Engineer as noted above, finding that the retaining wall as originally proposed by the applicant is not strictly necessary to accomplish the Page 2 of 7 applicant's objectives; and finding that the City Engineer's reconsiended modifications to the proposal provide a plan that is more consistent with past City practices regarding fill in lakeshore areas, while still providing applicant with the ability to improve his property by increasing its maintainability and usefulness. 7. At the Regular City Council Meeting on June 12, 1989, the City Council voted 5-0 to conceptually deny the variances and conditional use permit in their entirety, finding the proposal not supported by the necessary hardships and as not being consistent with the City's stated policies and past practice regarding work in lakeshore zones. The Orono Council further directed City staff to draft a resolution of denial. 8. Until after the application for variances and the conditional use permit was recommended for only limited approval by the Planning Commission, the City had received no complaints from the neighboring property owner regarding runoff and water accumulation problems on his property. The accumulation of runoff waters on the adjacent property owned by Charles Reid at 1400 Baldur Park Road, has not been demonstrated to place the neighboring residence in jeopardy of flooding. The adjacent property at 1400 Baldur Park Road is naturally lower in elevation than the applicant's property. Construction of the retaining wall and placement of fill on applicant's property would not necessarily eliminate any runoff accumulation problem that may exist. Such a problem might be more appropriately addressed by minor additions of fill or site grading on that neighboring property. 9. The proposed retaining wall and fill will have a visual impact from the Lake, and the proposed location of the retaining wall abutting the lot line would not allow for appropriate screening within applicant's property. 10. The land alterations proposed to be conducted within the lakeshore protected area ^d-75' from the lakeshore) are found to be in conflict with the following principles and goals set forth in Orono's Conjnunity Management Plan: Page 3 of 7 SHQRgLAND, FLOOD PLAN AND STORM WATER CONSIDERATIONS' - C.M.P. 3-9 ORONO*S MANY MILES OF SHORELINE ARE *:SPECIALLY SENSITIVE TO MISUSE OR OVERDEVELOPMENT. At tht Inttrfact batvttn land and water» the shoraline la aver chan9ing. Shorallnaa art subject to continual erosion by wave action# ice buildup or unstable soil conditions. Droughts dry out vegetation and heavy rains or snow melt cause land slipage. On top of these natural pressures# man is drawn to the lake and the shoreline often becomes his battleground with nature. Lake access often means active use and construction of buildings and structures causing unnatural soil loadings# vegetation removal# and land alteration. Exposed soil becomes more subject to erosion and man-made hardcover increases direct runoff quantity and speed. Power boats increase wave action and# more damaging# stir up the lake bottom causing release of nutrients and increased turbidity. The impact# of course, is a degradation of water quality, impaired lake access and a change in the natural aesthetics which drew people to the shore in the first place* Legal considerations become entangled when lot descriptions conflict or become inconsistent due to changing water levels or shoreline locations. Therefore, planning considerations must recognise the desirability of human interaction with the lake while at the same time providing for protection of nature's sensitively balanced shoreline ecology. LAND USE - C.M.P. 4-6 A PRINCIPAL GOAL OF ORONO*S PLANNING PROGRAM IS THE PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL AMENITIES# PARTICULARLY THE WATER QUALITY OF LAKE MINNETONKA. The Environmental Protection Plan emphasizes Orono's unique environmental position in relation to the long-term health of Lake Minnetonka. Land use and development will not be permitted at the expense of environmental protection. Retention of natural vegetation# light# air, and open space will be promoted. Shorelines will be protected from erosion and alteration. Wetlands and marshland will be protected and preserved as wildlife habitats# unique open spaces and most Importantly as the only economically practical method of flood protection and storm water runoff filtration. GENERAL LAND USE t ' NO. 2 - C.M.P. 4-12 2. ORONO'S LAND USE PLANS WILL BE BASED UPON ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION POLICIES. Land use and development must assure the conservation, protection and preservation of sensitive environmental resources in accordance with the goals and policies of the Environmental Protection Plan. Land use policies will encourage the wise use and manaoement of natural resources while prohibiting their Page 4 of 7 GENERAL LAND USE POLICY NO, 6 - C.M.P. 4-13 6. LAKE SHORELINES HILL BF PROTECTED FROM ALTERATION. 8hor«lAnd areas# whether bluff# beach or floodplain# are sensitive environnental features with significant impact on lake water quality# aesthetic values and land use function. These sane factors act to draw development which can be destructive if not properly regulated. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas will be preserved insofar as practical and reason able in order to retard surface runoff and soil erosion# and to utilise excess nutrients. Clear- cutting will be prohibited. In areas of soil or wave action erosion# material stone rip rap shoreline protection will be encouraged. GENERAL LAND USE POLICY NO. 13 - C.M.P. 4-15 13. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT MUST ENHANCE THE ENVIRONMENT. Land development should respect and enhance the unique natural features of the site and the general environmental assets of the community. Preservation of natural views# vegetation# drainage and general respect for unique site features always produces more aesthetic results and lasting value for the property owner and the community than does wholesale alteration of the landscape-or mathematical division to the highest possible density. . URBAN LAND USE POLICY NO. 13 - C.M.P. 4-19 13. RETENTION OF NATURAL VEGETATION WILL LIMIT THE IMPACT OF URBANIIATION AS VISIBLE FROM, THE LAKE.* Building heights will be limited to less than the typical tree height. . . . . Minimum green belts will be provided with pro hibitions against clearcutting or excessive thinning of vegetation. Natural vegetation will be preserved on slopes and retaining walls will be discouraged except when absolutely necessary to prevent erosion# in which cane they will be screened with natural vegetation. Page 5 Of 7 11. The granting of the required variances would result In the following violations of Section 10.06, Subdivision 3(a) of the Zoning Code with which the applicant must first comply before the requested variances can be granted: a. The granting of the requested variances would appear to serve merely as a convenience to the applicant as there have been no valid hardships demonstrated through the review of this application. b. The granting of the application Is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of the substantial property right of the applicant. c. Granting of the variance will tend to alter rhe essential character of the locality. d. The property In question can be put to reasonable use under conditions allowed by the official controls. Alternative, low maintenance types of ground cover can be established that will eliminate the applicant's stated safety concerns. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, on this 26th day of June, 1969. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallln, City Cleric James Grabek, Mayor Page 6 of 7 Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson Froai: Dates Subjects COWWUIHTIKB JUN 2i 1989 ^ cirroFoiHMo Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator June 21, 1989 #1410 Julie Prineas, 1980 Heritaae Drive - Variance - Resolution (2nd Review) Application - Request for lot width variance in order to construct a single family residence. Boning District - LR-IA, 2 acre, unsewered Ust of Exhibits Exhibit A - Staff's Sketch of Additional Alternate Drainfield Site Exhibit B - Revised Draft Resolution Exhibit C - Memo 6 Exhibits of 6/6/89 Discussion - As of this writing, the applicant's site evaluator is testing a third drainfield site, to the rear (west end) of the property. He notes that a previous soil boring indicates a mound system would be needed, but because there is sufficient flat area and preliminary indication of sandy soils, he expects good results. He anticipates a testing report will be submitted to staff prior to the June 26th meeting. Presuming that such testing verifies availability of this alternate drainfield site, the easterly proposed drainfield site can be abandoned, allowing expansion of the potential building envelope and allowing the driveway to access from County Road 15 down the middle of the Inc rather than hugging the lot line. With this revision, which should hopefully R-jit-isfy the concerns of the neighboring property owner, staff wonJd recommend approval of the lot width variance. Staff Re lendatxoi, - Staff recommends approval of the lot width variance for Ron and Julie Prineas per the attached resolution. When developed, the lot will have an address of 1920 Shoreline Drive. « ■« UJ ? ‘ 0 I ^ e U1 a ci k. 5a z < bi 0.I iS w 3f 5 iV) A RBSOLOnOH GRAHTISG A VARIAHCB TO MmiCIPAL ZOMING CODB SBCTICm 10.23, SUBDIVISIOB 6(B) PILB #1410 WHEREAS, Ronald and Julie Prineas (hereinafter **the applicants") are owners of the property located at 1980 Heritage Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows; Per Exhibit and *A" attached (hereinafter "the property"); WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6(B) to permit the construction of a single family residence on r lot of defined width 30' where a defined lot width of 200’ is normally required. EOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FIHDXHGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning Pile #1410. 2. The property Is located in the LR-lA Single Family La)ce8hore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 15, 1989, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: a) The lot area exceeds the minimum 2.0 dry builciable acre requirement. b) A feasi building envelope exists in addition to pi ry and i :nate drainfield sites which have been tested ciiul oved for use. Page i of 5 c) The hardship to the property lies in its extreme narrowness at the point where the defined lot width is measured. Furthermorer there is no adjacent land available for purchase that would increase the defined lot width to the 200' minimum standard. 4. Hennepin County Department of Public Works has verifxed that the County will approve a private driveway access onto County Road 15. ^e property contains a feasible building site, imited by narrowness of the lot and by the 'nfield sites, hence careful site planning ad in developing the property. Therefore, it that a diagram of the building envelope and drainfield _^tes be filed with this resolution to make future potential buyers of the property aware of the site limitations• 5. Altbonr’ that e: design, will be is approp«. 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Cornu ssion, reports by City staff, comments by th3 applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 7. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property arc peculiar to it end do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect ttaff:»c conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other dangzr to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the appll ^nt, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property light of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. C 1C1.DSIONS, ORDER AMD COMCITIOMS Based upon the : 'ive findings, tne Orono City Council hereby grants a variance Mi^rfcipnl Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6(B) to pei»Ait the construction of a single family residence on this lot of defined width 30' where a 200 toot defined lot width is normally required for construction of a single family r.esivlsnoe, subject to the following conditions:I ^age 2 of 5 1. Any proposed residence must meet the required minimum setbacks established for the LR-IA zoning district, and must further meet the required setbacks from drainfield sites. 2. A diagram of the building envelope and approved drainfield sites shall be attached to this resolution as Exhibit "B", to advise future potential buyers of the property of the building site limitations. 3. Any proposed residence or development of the property shall meet the hardcover requirements of the LR-IA zoning district. 4. No other zoning variances for devel<'pment of this property will be granted. 5. The approved access for the property is a single driveway at County Road 15. 6. The standard park fee shall be collected by the City at the time a building permit is issued. 7. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (June 12, 1990). 8. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 9. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, and hereby agree co the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 5 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 26th day of June, 1989. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Jeunes R. Grabek, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OP MINNESOTA) )ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 26th day of June, 1989, by James R. Grabek and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public My Commission Expires Page 4 of 5 TO: Mayor Grabek and Council City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: Michael Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Admin. DATS: June 6, 1989 SUBJ: #1410-Ron and Julie Prineas, 1980 Heritage Drive Variance - Resolution Application - Request for lot width variance in order to construct a single family residence. Zoning District - LR-IA, 2 acre unsewered List of Exhibits - Exhibit A - Planning Commission Minutes 5/15/89 Exhibit B - Notice of Planning Commission Action 5/19/89 Exhibit C - Letter from Hennepin County re: Road Access Exhibit D - Alternate Drainfield Site Location & Definition of Buildable Envelope Exhibit E - Memo and exhibits of 5/11/89 Exhibit F - Draft Resolution Discussion - Please review the memo and exhibits of 5/ll/89r and the Planning Commission Minutes. Briefly, applicants have a narrow, separate 2-acre parcel adjacent to their homestead lot. The request is a lot width variance in order to sell the narrow lot as a separate building site. The applicants have provided the necessary septic testing information to show that two drainfield sites exist on the property. A possible third drainfield site, to the rear of the property (west), has not been tested, but would also likely prove suitable for a mound system, as do the two tested sites. The lot has legal access and frontage on County Road 15, and has 20' of lakeshore. At the Planning Commission public hearing, access became an issue because neighboring property owners expressed concern about the safety of a new driveway access onto County Road 15. It was suggested by the neighboring property owners that an access to the rear, via Heritage Drive, be considered. After much discussion, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 (with one abstension due to a potential conflict of interest) to recommend approval of the 170* lot width variance, conditioned on the following: 1. Any proposed residence structure must meet the required lot line and septic envelope setbacks. 2. No new driveway access to County Road 15. Applicant must find alternative access, via a shared driveway with neighbor or an easement to the rear of the property. 3. review. Complete remaining septic testing prior to Council The Planning Commission suggested that applicant construct a long driveway through the homestead parcel on an existing 20* road easement abutting the railroad right-of-way. Alternatively, the Planning Commission suggested that applicants gain access for the narrow lot by sharing the existing driveway of the neighbors to the south. The applicants requested a letter from Hennepin County regarding access to County Road 15 directly. The County indicated they have absolutely no problem with an access driveway being constructed for this property. In a follow-up discussion with Dave Zetterstrom of Hennepin County, he indicated that construction of a new driveway would function essentially as a shared entrance, while providing better sight distance than the existing intersection of Heritage Drive with County 15. Additionally, staff would note that due to topographical concerns, it would be costly to construct a 500 foot long driveway to serve the proposed building site from Heritage Drive, and such a driveway would have a significant detrimental effect on two of the three potential drainfield sites on the property. For all of the above-noted reasons, staff would recommend that a direct access to County Road 15 oe approved. Finally, note that the conceptually proposed house is oriented so that the garage faces one of the alternate drainfield sites. Since this is only a conceptual proposal to show that a house could feasibly be placed within the building envelope, staff would expect that any house proposed for the property would be subject to more thorough site planning to insure an appropriate layout. Note that the Planning Commission did not feel it was strictly necessary to do a lot line rearrangement to make the potential building envelope larger, although staff suggested this as a potential benefit to the property. Of course, any potential buyer of the property would have to make themselves aware of the limited building envelope. A copy of the building envelope diagram should be filed in the chain of title with any approval resolution that is adopted. Staff RecoHDendation - Staff would recommend approval of the 170* variance to the 200* lot width requirement, finding that the property exceeds the 2-acre minimum lot area requirement, and finding that a feasible building envelope exists in addition to primary and alternate drainfield sites. The hardship in this case is the existing layout of the lot in relationship to its road frontage and the fact that there is no available land adjacent to the point from which lot widths are measured. Staff would recommend the following conditions if variance approval is granted: 1. Building envelope and drainfield site diagram shall be filed in the chain of title with a copy of the approval resolution. 2. Approval of a direct driveway access to County Road 15. 3. Any proposed residence must meet the required setbacks of the LR-IA zoning district and not conflict with septic system setbacks. 4. Payment of the standard park fee when a building permit is issued. bo TWSj /VceCi TO TSsT A S/Tff 5"- o MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MAY 15, 1989 ZONING FILE #1408-SMITH BAY MARINA CONTINUED accessory structure of 32*. Approval is conditioned upon a planting schedule with specific planting identification being presented to the City Council. Mabusth asked the applicant about the existence of an underground gas tank and asked the applicant to provide the City with such information. Kelley added that provision to his motion. Bellows seconded. Kelley added that the City should be very strict when dealing with gas tanks being placed near the lakeshore. Motion, Ayes«5, Nays»0, Cohen abstained. Motion passed. #1409 JANN 8 RENEE OLSTEN 3090 FARPIEN LANE CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 9:42 P.M. TO 9:45 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. The applicant was present for this public hearing, as was the applicant's contractor, Mr. Brian Butterfield. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that the land alteration conditional use permit was required because the work is being done after the issuance of the building permit. Mabusth asked the contractor whether the excavated dirt would be distributed and seeded? Mr. Butterfield replied that there would be approximately 200 yards that would be distributed on site and seeded. Mabusth asked how many yards of fill would be required to achieve the 4" to 6" indicated on the landscaping plan? Mr. Butterfield said approximately 200 cubic yards would be used to grade on the north side of the driveway and around the septic system. Mabusth reminded Mr. Butterfield to use -^clal care ;.ith filling in drainfield area. Gaffron notec at he had advised owners to fill around the drainfield. Mr. cutterfield said that he had tracks on his bob cat. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Cohen, to recommend approval of this application. Motion, Ayes»6, Nays«0, Motion passed. #1410 JULIE PRINBAS 1980 HERITAGE DRIVE VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 9:47 P.M. TO 10:10 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. and Mrs. Prineas were present for this matter. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MAY 15, 1989 ZONING FILE #1410-PRINEAS CONTINUED explained that the applicants were seeking a lot width variance. The standard for the LR-IA, 2 acre zoning district is 200* and the defined width of this lot at the 50* setback from County Road 15 is only 30*. The applicants will require a 170* variance. Gaffron said that the applicants were required to provide septic testing to show where the house and drainfield sites will be. The site evaluator initially proposed to place two drainfield sites west of the house where the lot has the most width. However, during the testing, it was determined that there would be room for only one system at that site and additional testing would be needed to find a suitable second alternate site. Gaffron said that the building envelope would be very limited when taking the drainfield sites and setbacks into consideration. Staff is recommending that the building limitations be eased by having a minor subdivision done to add a triangle of the applicants* adjacent property. The lot line rearrangement would increase the building envelope by 80%. The applicants' lot containing their residence has a separate tax identification number and is in excess of 2 acres. The lot line rearrangement would not create any substandard setbacks for the existing principal structure. Chairman Kelley questioned whether this lot had riparian rights? Gaffron replied that the applicants would give up their riparian access to the existing house. Chairman Kelley asked the Prineases if they would object to including the triange of the property with the new lot? Mr. Keith Nelson, Mr. and Mrs. Prineas' Attorney, said that Mr. and Mrs. Prineas preferred to proceed with the lot width variance as proposed. He said that the parcel has always existed as is. Secondly, the Prineas's homestead parcel is a bit over 3 acres and any new owner would not require a variance to board a horse. Mr. Nelson said that placing a house further back on the new lot would detract from the existing views cf any adjacent property. Kelley said that the Planning Commission was only trying to provide the applicants with an option that would create a sufficient building envelope. He said that the City would not likely approve a variance for constructing a residence on the new lot. Gaffron noted that the designated wetland would tcke away from the lot area for most zoning purposes and would possibly take away from the zoning requirement for horses. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron said that the access for this lot is proposed off of County Road 15. The applicants have received approval from Hennepin County for this access. Mr. and Mrs. Robert Stierna, of 1930 Shoreline Drive, indicated that they were concerned about the access. He said that he had a proposed agreement from the previous owners of the applicants' property. The agreement would extinguish an easement that exists along the back 20* of the lot. Mr. Stierna said that the easement extended from the railrod to Arbor Street and runs MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MAY 15, 1989 ZONING PILE #1410-PRINEAS CONTINUED across their property as well. Ms. Carol Laquey, the applicants* real estate agent, provided a brief history regarding the easement. She said that once Heritage Drive was put through, there was no longer a need for the easement. She said that the applicants' parcel was designed to access off of County Road 15. She said that if the easement were used, the access would be over 450' in length. Planning Commissioner Bellows said that she would prefer to see the access occur somewhere other than County Road 15. Ms. Laquey asked if the City would be willing to maintain Railroad Avenue. Bellows replied that this would be no different than any ether subdivision and that an outlot designation would be required. Kelley pointed out that the applicants were not subdividing. Bellows commented that in any event, accessing off of County Road 15 was a bad idea. Gaffron said that accessing in another location may interfere with the septic sites. Planning Commissioner Brown questioned whether it would be possible to share a driveway with the Stearns? The Stiernas indicated that they would be in favor of such a proposal. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Cohen, to recommend approval of this application provided that there be no additional access off of County Road 15. Mr. Nelson disagreed with such a proposal saying that it made the application contingent upon the neighbors' approval. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=0, Hanson abstained. (Planning Commissi ner Hanson departed at this time). REVIEW OF REVISED WORDING - ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS Planning Commissioner Cohen questioned the wording of sections of these amendments for the sake of clarity. In Section 1(c)(2), the heading should be revised to read "Oversized accessory structures are regulated by the following table:" (Planning Commissioner Bellows departed at this time.) Section 1(c)(3)(c) should clarify that the covenants and agreement be "in writing". Also, sentence structure with no change in meaning was changed in Section 1(c)(3)(c)i and ill. Section 1(c)(4) was revised to refer to any required yard as defined for each zoning district, to clarify the intent and meaning. Section 2 was revised by changing the sentence structure and adding the words "tota1 area", "combined footprint", and "all principal and accessory structures", to clarify the intents and meanings of these phrases. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning cm OF OROSO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 ZONING FILE NO. §1410 NOnCB OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 473-7357 Date of Notice: 05/19/89 TO:Ron & Julie Prineas COPIES TO: 1980 Heritage Drive Wayzata, NN 55391 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance DATE OF MEETING: 5/15/89 VOTE: 5 For 0 Against 1 Abstain Planning Coanission reconnends the folloiring: Approval subject to conditions noted below NOTES AMD SPECIAL CONDITIONS: P Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested 170* lot width variance, with the following conditions: 1. Any proposed residence structure must meet the required lot line asnd septic envelope setbacks. 2. No new driveway access to County Road 15. Applicant must fine alternative access, via a shared driveway with neighbor or an easement tc the rear of the property. 3. Complete remaining septic testing prior to Council review. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: ^ City Council Monday, June 12, 1989; meeting starts at 7:00p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. ^ HENNE DEPARTMENT Oh PUBLIC WORKS Operations Division 320 Washington Ave. South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 Phone:(612)935-3381 c 1- ■>* ! V - June 2, 1989 Mr. Ron Prineas 1920 Heritage Drive Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Re: Access to County Road 15 Dear Sir; At your request we have reviewed the access from your site onto County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 15. Since the visibility Is practically unlimited and the proposed driveway would abut an existing private driveway, in effect functioning as a shared entrance, Hennepin County will allow access at that location. Although access Is usually denied when a parcel abuts a city street. In this Instance the access to CSAH 15 seems reasonable, given the alternatives. Please call with any further questions. Sincerely, David K.^etterstrom Entrance Permit Coordinator OKZ:pl cc: Mike Gaffron, City of Orono HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal oppoftunity employer . .1.B . 1.. . . •. •* % -|.i VA iia| CQ »'. j: H4iJ X « 0*0 l4 . »H ^ c «H4pH « 0 fO *H 4i ^ U > ® ® N 5 ^ »H CP •M 0.'® -H O 5S'"g . %T3 - <M 4^ n ^ 14 O o ^ « o o n •H n 4j u V *» -HOC •H W 'O 4S c ^ 25 **5? «M M ^ o u * 10 % M o all ® C IH c u j u a 4J a *D o o n h <«4 u •*4 Ti 0 a o> 8 a e « o X e «H a •H o ® « •M i-i j: c O O 41 c 0 C 0 n <H o s ■ O «M iH 4J ••< O «M *n N CP O Pu >««H B •H 14 <H 0 «i4 0 *a 0 <0 0 4i 14 »H <n 41 0 p 4» 0 0 O -H • 0 3 U (4 O 3X 0 X /: 4i «M 41 9 « O >*9 0 0. 0 o la 41 i4 >01 0 0 il _ 0 0 14 9 0>£ 0 4i 01 C 4i C 0 ^ - c .-H t •O >* B 54 0» c CiH O s 0 14 « N0■s-^ss ^ X if 2^0 ^ 0 O «M 4i 01 4» U O 0 0 ^ 41 0 C 0 ?5 * 0.5a 41 0«u <M l4 C 'W « O 0 CO m X 0t; *• ®« cg.8 *■“ Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairm2m Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bemhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator May 11, 1B89 #1410 Julie Prineas, 1980 Heritage Drive - Variance - Public Hearing I Zoning District - LR-IA, Single family lakeshore residential, 2 acre, unsewered Application - Request for lot width variance to construct a single family residence. List of Exhibits Dates Subject: Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Survey with Staff Notations Exhibit P - Access Approval from Hennepin County Exhibit G - Wetlands Air Photo •* H • ^uiuftiwc. Pu^i Pertinent Facts - 1. Lot Area ■ 2.05 acres. 2. Defined lot width at the 50* setback from County Road 15 is 30* where 200' width is required. 3. Staff has required applicant to provide a conceptual site plan indicating the house location, as well as a site evaluation for septic system construction, to verify that this is a buildable lot. 4. Applicant has provided a site evaluation report which generally indicates that a.mound system is required on the property. The primary site would be located west of the proposed house site.^ The site evaluator had Indicated that the primary and alternate sites would botn be west of the house, however after discussions regarding required setbacks and the width of the mound due to slope constraints, it was determined that a second alternate site should be tested. There are two feasible locations, one being at the far west end of the lot, the other being east of the house site. Testing is currently underway for this secondary site and due to sandy soils anticipated, ^nere is a slight possibility that one of the two alternate sites would be suitable for trenches. Either site could be expected to support a mound system. Zoning File #1410 May 11, 1989 Page 2 of 3 5,Besed on the drainfield sites, and the required 30^ side setbacks, an odd shaped building envelope_of approximately 7,200 s.f. would be available and still leave adequate setbc:ck to tne mound sites. 6.Because of the location of the mound sites, required setbacks, and narrowness of the property, the proposed building envelope is extremely limited and will require cautious site planning to develop a residence. 7.The proposed house site is at a high point on the lot, and drainage generally would flow away from the house and away from neighboring residences towards two natural wetland areas to the southwest and northeast of the property. The drainage impact of this development would be minimal. 8.Note that the applicant also owns an adjacent 3'-acre developed parcel. Both the existing house and che lot for which a variance is requested exceed the 2 acre requirement. The existing house has a tested alternate drainfield site. Allowing this lot width variance and granting buildability to the parcel in question will not limit the septic capabilities for the existing residence property. 9.Hennepin County has indicated they will approve a driveway access at County Road 15 for the subject property (see the attached memo from Dave Zetterstrom). Discussion - The applicant and her surveyor have suggested a conceptual house location and design for purposes of discussion. Since applicant's intent is to either Re 11 the entire 5-&cre property as a single u;iit or sell off the house and extra lot separately, we are certainly not bound to this specific site plan. Also note that, since one of the likely drainfield sit^s is directly east of th^ building envelope, the garage certhinly could not be orient c»d as shown on the survey and still maintain driveway setback?? from the drainfield* area. Certainly this specific house plan could be re-oriented to eliminate any conflict, and it is most likely that a different house entirely will be constructed on this lot if the variance is approved. Note that at its widest point, the lot is less than the 200* required lot width. An option which applicant would prefer to avoid, is a lot line rearrangement to give the subject property more acreage. A schematic to accomplish that is shown in Exhibit E. Note that by adding 5,000 s.f. to the lot the potential usable building envelope is practically doubled. Zoning File #1410 May 11, 1989 Page 3 of 3 Staff Recommendation - Given the septic system and site information provided, a modest single family residence can be developed on this long, narrow lot subject to the some extreme site limitations. However, the buildability of the lot would be significantly enhanced by adding a fairly small portion of adjacent land near the proposed building envelope. The Planning Commission may wish to consider the following options: 1. Recommend approval of the defined 170* lot width variance, with the condition that any proposed residence must meet the required lot line and septic envelope setbacks. 2. Recommend approval subject to a lot line rearrangement which opens up the building envelope, such as shown in Exhibit E, and again require that all setbacks be met. 3. Recommend denial based on the limited building envelope available. 4. Other. wftWjtL cm OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional vari Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) »14l 150 wi'ccA TL 150/;-rrrT;;T_ iL.ujv' vw)Mi.wuai t t nntm lu* 413^450 cool ROl T oy. r V V Site Address ( s)ni^ PiSS ~ cSH O L//\) O fl^ S PROPERTY LOCATION Property Identification Number (P.I.O.) IO I/ ycQ ^ (DO ! U> Please check one *- Property abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Phone (home) V X3 ~ O Name ______ Phone (work) Address; 1^90 U(’A/T/)GC^ .Vcity; \jiiZip; ! OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ____________ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address: Date City: Property Acquired j ^ ^ f Zip: (month/year) (do)J(do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) Estimated Construction Cost $DESCRIPnOH OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: /t ^S\ t<JC ^ A FO/l^ LZ(L.\ 1 olCXD ^7^ UJ/^ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances (, Other _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Lot Width Front _ _ Hardcover » Side Rear) HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from stfict enforcement of zoning regulations; \u .K'T'M_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DBSCRJPTIOH OF UNnSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventjLng compliance with Zoning Code Requirements; Ir 5^ :S ' a ■— * /cKOO I I 2. 3. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). Certificate o;: survey including hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature^Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date ^ f(^ ^I Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ■k\%tsJ * I. tl:= — V- / V .<>“».r:i ?>A ->^v> v.,v V-;; • <T’7 '/ V/?S>-4- ^ \:i^'Qo NV ^f/ y\ y'. l^'•p.■V. > f •jIIs f? V •s >j ac --iy V8* ‘ -*r ici <C, v^irr c^C • S OsKt « ♦ *■* Ma w <« M 0 oe ^ uj oo- >5J ^ M 12 ^ a !o < lU w lA M K> 2 Z Ul CJ M M M U1 ae oe oe 5K M & a »- 2 e o o X K '"‘"-'-'oa K) O w % 58 O CM «»■ w in UJM ui Qvsl ^ < r»j« ol-t CO •• O -J CO a M O < i at a “5 ^ lO U.3 -I!V* 35 )“ SoS i!i CD rH rH I U1 ^ O CX H> 0 O (A «■ M a as- 5§i ui 1 Me *-M O (Aw9< U M o oe (A M(J oe O' S ° 5 a M ill A JA >•ssa % •n yj -I f* u < 0 * ^ o|ui M ^CAi^iSSS ja2^«.u“‘ CM OE M M O 1 Q (X a < :5S “-“'S5M n -> oe ^ a a o X H a 2 2 <0 >(0 o 8 8 O' lA o sa a « X X o o “) ”1 jj CM UJ a o X lA ^O««ojg •H X > > M 2V sisxo 3 o X »- •» O Ui UI X tn X X o N lA O X Z I-I z X UI UI 3 X Q UI X X X wiiM ssa XMX CM IK (A (Aatta S o |xa5o|A X UI ui *" CA M «A UI -J _ UI UI 2 »*!s sSdii^S»*AOZOUc-<Z lAOXXxZ g«Psi X X S > N ci<k di 0\ i i ic 6: ' 1 \ V \ \, s 1 ( \ \''' ' \ \\!\U'VS\ \ \ \ VISLX \ No ^ \ \ \’-A-\'\?^\\ l'<\ \ \ \ ' 1 \ \ ' \AV \\W\\'^H M s \ \ l \- JAfr W \ ^r ' ' ^ WP^>\\ \ \ \ |».i! •' \J^\ / 'V\ W \ _> 'V\\ V\^Vm \ '• \ \ i\ -xv / ^“1 ! V ' 'v V \ \V \^ ' s (^spnrjSr^IjjKsr tr HENNEPINLnJ '^-^At»L0 ”^t>/WAr ^,w ;-.r: x: n !> f 1 7. J . i» ..^ L/V^f ;*o*. “iLVi w. «* V. <>Biigi .g~ Tijn. ‘ tri^i .. »7-« >c ItiiiilaJ-’ ;>< %>' t »wQipiftr ■nr jttftt i »/» V &» ♦// • '*■ V *► 1^ :sM* AV yy sJ'/ '^ -' - * ?-i% a' f. • /*« ? fj f yv^ t» *___ ■f - r» %i, *»«j/ cj. •:^lV-/4 •i . '!• ■'' • I; }ii — •i«# • I ■ : ■ -i ' -i •:* •. V . . • i-c -i..->.-j-^i-r .-MMSafe. -■ r.V:rf.-J2 ^Swaai - -'I vUi fl • I': .::: vT - .r v,: *. • . -..•♦•• •::i-ii ^ ' I •. -.; • V -*.>....> r’ ; :•;■*•»■'•- •;■; . V..~. ... •.-.I V \M WBSBa li . 1 •-iT’V »* M:...,r,..-,V. ■.’I ' *‘ I .N‘ I * ■>. iv ^■ 5,.[.’•i-'f^i V' ;i|i!yii^»!i9iii§Bji ■■'8fe5!F^a:.:r!«ni MiflTi' - iir • ^ ‘ • 'tvKilBilSii ilv':.:: .a n* ■ ■K* I r. V i;>^ ; liSlgSiiTlfiii V:-V ; V '• vW:A M:eswj«=?r(:.'.3«3l^ lili: • yrf.t. >■';WiA COUNCIL MEETING JUN 2 « 1989 CITY OF ONONO TO: Mayor Grabek and Council Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: Michael Gaffron, Asst. Plar ing & Zoning Administrator DATS: June 21, 1989 SUBJ: #1423-Edward C. Brown, 355 Stubbs Bay Road North Variance - Resolution Zoning District - RR-IA, Single Family, Unsewered, 5-Acre Minimum Application - Request for variance to allow accessory building to be located nearer the front lot line than the principal building. List of Exhibits - Exhibit A - Notice of Planning Commission Action 6/21/89 Exhibit B - Proposed Resolution Exhibit C - Memo and Exhibits of June 12, 1989 Discussion - Please review the memo and exhibits of June 12, 1989. Applicant owns a property of 10 acres in area, and proposes to construct a garage nearer the front lot line than the house, technically requiring a variance to Zoning Code Section 10.03, subd. 9(d). The proposed garage will be more than 40' from the house, and more than 195' from all lot lines. The proposed garage will be adequately screened by existing vegetation so that it will not be visible from neighboring properties. The Planning Commission, at their meeting of June 19, 1989, recommended approval, finding that the proposed garage will not be visible from neighboring properties and has no visual impact on the surrounding neighborhood. Staff Recomsendation - Staff recommends approval per the Planning Commission recommendation, per the attached resolution. CITY OP OROHO P. O. Box, 6ft j , Crystal Aayi; MR' 55^23 473-7357 ZONING PILE #1423 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice: June 21, 1989 TO: Edward C. Brown 355 Stubbs Bay Road North Long Lake, MN 55356 COPIES TO: TYPE OP APPLICATION:XXXX Variance _ _ Conditional Use Permit _ _ Subdivision Other DATE OP MEETING: 6/19/89 VOTE: For: Abstention: 4; Against; 0 1 (Edward C. Brown; Planning Commission recommends the following: XXXX Approval as submitted _ _ Approval subject to conditions noted below _ _ Denial for reasons noted below _ _ Tabled for reasons noted below _ _ No action required NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Applicant*s next s.'heduied meeting is confirmed as City Council, Monday, June 26, 1989; Meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire c‘=‘rtified copies of the official Planning Commisfiion minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval of the Planning Commission. A RBSOLOTIOH 6RANTIHG A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 9(D) PILE #1423 WHEREAS, Edward C. Brown (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 355 Stubbs Bay Road North within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Exhibit "A" attached, (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9(D) to permit the construction of a detached garage to be located nearer the front lot line than the principal structure on the property, where no accessory structures are normally allowed. HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: 1. FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zo< 2. The property is located in the RR- Residential Zoning District. File #1423. »jle Family Rural 3. The property is 10.0 acres in area. 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on June 19, 1989, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: a. The proposed garage will not be visible from neighboring properties due to screening by existing vegetation on the property. b. proposed garage has no visual impact on the surrou..ding neighborhood. Page 1 of 4 5. The proposed garage location meets or exceeds all other setback requirements not only for an accessory structure, but also those which would be required for a principal structure. 6. T*he City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 7. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district? that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or .fficulty? is necessary to preserve a substantial proper^ y right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the pirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9(D) to permit the construction of a detached garage located nearer the front lot line than the existing principal building on the property, subject to the following conditions: 1. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (June 26, 1990). 2. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 2 of * 3. The undersigned applicant has readr understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 26th day of June, 1989. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Property Owner Property Owner STATE OP MINNESOTA) )S8. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ _ day of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _ _, by James R. Grabek ard Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public My Commission Expires Page 3 of 4 Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Ftob: Datet Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator June 12, 1989 Subjects #1423 Edward C. Broim, 355 Stubb's Bay Road North - Variance - Public Hearing Boning District - RR-IA, Single family, unsewered, 5 acres Application - Request for variance to allow accessory building to be located nearer the front lot line than the principal building. List of Sxhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit P Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Survey with Staff Notations Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) Pertinent Facts - 1. The proposed garage location meets the required setbacks from lot lines, wetlands, and other structures, but technically requires a variance because it is to be located nearer the front lot line than the principal building on th^ property. 2.The property at the location of the proposed garage is heavily wooded, and the garage will not be visible t'rom adjacent properties. Discussion - The zoning code makes no distinction between small residential lots and large hobby farm parcels in regards to the location of accessory buildings. While the proposed garage in ^stion has no significant effect on neighboring properties and s certainly reasonable for this large property, technically a variance is required. ! The survey provided was used to show the proposed location of the applicant's house and barn which were constructed in 1985. Based on the proposed barn location per the survey, technically a variance should also have been required for that structure, but this apparently was missed by staff. A recent trip to the site by the zoning staff found that the actual barn location appears to be further west in relation to the front line of the house than shown on the survey. It is possible that the barn does meet the requirement of not being between the front lot line and the house, alt/i« ugh this has not been verified by a new survey. Staff has not requested a verification survey. ■■>>’*«* •' -I *>• Zoning File #1423 June 12, 1989 Page 2 of 2 Staff Rern—f ndation - Staff would recommend app..oval of the variance to Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D), based on the finding that the proposed garage will not be visible from neighboring properties and has no visual impact on the surrounding neighborhood. (Does Planning Commission feel that the code should be amended to allow accessory structures nearer the front lot line than the principal building on large parcels of a given minimum lot area?) CITY OF OROHO - VARIAHCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($30.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) #1423 PROPERTY LOCATION - Site Address JS^ /Q > Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ____ Please check one - Property abstract or ■ CITY OF OROyn f i'.vAvrr OFFICE i 'yAAiwVV&.WVVV 01 OEH 150.ruzry ' W" liECEIPT-THA^^ YOs ^141650 COOl ROl h y.-VW/ 1 torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Phone (home)^73-//^o Name X . C •Phone (work) 3 */} ^ ^ Address: 3:T^ 5Ti/»‘2>3S City: /A}CF^ Zip: Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential ~Other (specify) DESCRIPTIOH OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ S. (nn^ Describe request in detail; ^ VARTANCBS REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Veuriances ( Lot Width, Front ^ ' r ____ Hardcover ^. Side Rear) Other . 1. . JtI • v»‘.---- EABDSIZIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting strict enforcement of zoning regulations; i'tCtL tZ^rK>r?\/AL. i l^^C^ArTinrJ C S^V^Ti-n^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DBSCRXPTIOH OF UNnSUAL PROPERTY COMDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements; Vo 7^ (y/\/i^0j ^iSTA$Jci- _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). ^ ^Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this applies ^lion. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature^______________________________ Date_____________ APPLICAHT'S STGMATUHB , , . ^ ^ The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies ^^at the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date S-/x^6A/ OWHERS SIGRATURB , » «The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to thio application ana further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga- tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature _________________ Date —____- Applicant must have all subn .ttals Into the City offices 25 <iays before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 9-9 Im M ♦ r* M h se I sa s 0 1 n i «L r.1 *83 !ii M XZ*^s**5*"«si:;i§i mi :5^|8 •'3l2x 381PU||?*288T 5«il •"SlIISoS I ili!llHI .* -*1 * • ■1' lU *£ §9- « 8 ”.aM M 88* ^SSSi« P o a ZM _ ? ** s»o i^si"'aBS* X 8 „>• o 5 |8 STIMS BA F GREGORY M/TTERFIEL .YBROGK A :R BLOG 55402M X P M X « X•rissi s^aii*sSH^sio X a u P X s|.i hM Xi z ^ ^ssn 8«!l|i M |B 2 Ul poS _ ejg8 Ej ^ o _2S88885 «Z o§3«o .5^X < 111H|i e :::©©?"e\:,:G milH M M X M 8g|i» Mil »a88 . • 5’v. :-. lu.v-:"-'iEi-S.r;.. I !_■ .■.:...-,G:r:c.::r©:j:::@‘i-vo --r Certificate of Survey for Ed and Judy Brown in the SW% of Section 32>nd>23 Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the follow ing describ'd property: , ^ , That part of the Southwest quarter of Section 32, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of said Southwest q.arter distant 489.32 feet South, as measured along said East line, feom the Northeast corner of said Southwest quarter; thence West parallel with t North line c.' salo C'^uthwest quarter a distance of 575.00 feet; thence South parallel with said East line of the Southwest quarte. * distance of 350.00 feet; thence West parallel with said North line of the Southwest quarter a distance 445.00 feet; thence North parallel with said East line of the Southwest quarter to said North line of the Southwest quarter; thence East along said North line of the Southwest quarter to the Northeast corner of said Southwest quarter; thence South along said East line of the South west quarter to the point of beginning, EXCEPT that part of said Southwest quarter described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of said Southwest quarter distant 439.31 feet South, as meas ured along said East line, from the Martheast corner of said Southwest quarter; thence West parallel with the North line of said Southwest quarter a distance of 495.00 feet; thence North parallel with said East line cf the Southwest quarter to said North line of the Southwest quarter;' thence East along said North line of the Southwest quarter to the Northeast corner of said Southwest quarter; thence South along said East line of the Southwest quarter to the point of beginning, EXCEPT the East 33 feet thereof, the location of all existing buildings. If any, thereon, and the proposed location of three proposed buildings. It does rot purport to show any other Improvements or encroachments. 'n src-. 10.0 i Subd. 9. Accessory Buildings, * A. Time of Construction. No accessory building or structure shall be constructed on any lot prior to the time of construction of the principal building to which it is accessory. *: ■ B. Height Restrictions. No accessory building in the "R" District shall exceed the height of the principal building except barns or stables which shall be subject to the approval of the Council. C. Area Restrictions. In all "R" Districts no accessory building shall exceed 1,000 square feet of floor area except barn, sy^ble or greenhouse. 5or (SLe/iSfOfO D. Location. No detached garages or other acces sory building sh^Jrl be located nearer the front lot line than the principal building on that lot except on lots which have frontage on a lake. Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-6' 1. Location of Principal Ruilding to Lakeshore. No principal building shall be located closer than 75 feet to the natural ordinary high water mark of a lake abutting the property. This lakeshore setback shall be determined as the mean horizontal distance between the natural ordinary high water mark on the lakeshore and the allowable building line. 2.'^' Variance From Lakeshore Setback. Any application for a variance from the requirements of Item 1 above shall be referred to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for its approval before final action by the Council. Source: Ordinance No. 155 Effective Date: 2-14-74 Ordinance No. 24, Second Series Page 2 of 6 Section 3. Ordinance Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) is hereby repealed and the following language substituted in its place: D. No detached garage or other accessory building shall be located nearer the front or street lot line than the principal building on that lot except on lots which have frontage on a lake and rear yard adjacent to a street, accessory buildings located within the street or rear yards of such lots are subject to the setback requirements of Section 10.23, Subdivision 6B, Section 10.24, Subdivision 5B and Section 10.25, Subdivision 6B except that detached garages may be located 10 feet from the street or rear lot line when doors face away from the street and a turn-around is provided on site. This section shall not apply to lake- shore lots divided by roadways or corner lots. e.lL Certificate of Survey for Ed and Judy Brown In the SHU.bf Section 32-118-23 Hennepin County, Minnesota V---Z7Zi4' 52S.oi>'■sr-3?|vr' ............ .11DS I I . fa. *AjO.........../'•.ri iq"' t 'I- jr..’">■'.:,'V.-.-.^ <iA6AGe T^AAJ •^?5.?v>' —>l /1PP/<6e^^r Locfienof^ Of fX/^n^c. ^ /A> ; ■ it^lAT-for^ TO ; ^££1F i *7^ (Se f^Jo — •. ; ;; C^x>s£•t^--^c> ; ffijo*<n Len LH^c\ TWATO j ^WIT KiefT Ve/2.1 fr/«2t> t.'i <4-5.00' £*jysi'^2<2r'Z.'V4 —-*•=*’■■___3 '•■ M • r • ■• •• t Kh inS'd'sJrlbed'proSSJty:"'' " ® """ represenUtlon of a survey of the boundaries of the follow- Je?{dl!J! d«c;ibe®“d“i's''?oho«-‘" "® »' «» 5th frlnclpal ip^lsisLl^^ :-i: »i I n inereoT, ■ • " .......... lt*doernot"p?Jp^rt to'lloII^Sj othSriniJmeTOnts^TSncro^^ location of three proposed buildings. ^caifij:__LJUnch_i_JUOuoLjE«AjL.COFFIN & GRONDERG,' IHC: 6218 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administ DATE: June 21, 1989 5oilNCtL MEETING JUN 2( 1989 CITYOFORONO (T SUBJECT: Regional Transportation Board Appointments ATTACHMENT: A. AMM Memo Dated June 6, 1989 B. Shorewood Letter Dated June 19, 1989 ISSUE - 1. Determine if any Orono CounciImember is interested nomination to the Regional Transportation Board, in a 2. Determine if the Council wants to undertake any endorsements in advance of: a. ) AMM Board's selection and/or b. ) Metro Council selection INTRODUCTION - Transmitted previously to you by both the City and probably the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities was Attachment A which outlines the new way in which Board Members will be appointed to the Regional Transit Board, As noted a response was due to AMM by June 21st for those who were interested, DISCUSSION - The AMM has been asked to submit a maximum of two names for each Regional Transit District (which is composed of two Metro Council Districts,) As noted in the attached map of Attachment A, the Council nominee from this area will be from Metro Council Districts 9 and 13, This district extends from Eden Prairie and Shorewood on the south to St, Francis in Anoka County on the north. As of noon on June 21st the following individuals had submitted their names to the AMM indicating their interest in appointment, Jan Haugen, Mayor, Shorewood Patricia Pidcock, CounciImember, Eden Prairie (No letter had been received,) The AMM nominations will be submitted to the Metro Council, who will in turn select a Board member for each district, (It should be noted that I am an AMM Board member and will be voting on the matter at the AMM,) ALTERNATIVES - 1. Determine if any Orono Councilmember is interested. rU.’ 2. Determine if the Council wants to undertake any endorsement prior to AMM action. 3. Determine whether the Council wants to do any endorsement action prior to Met Council selection once the two candidates are known from each district. 4. Table pending AMM action. 5. Comment to the City Administrator any interests or desires to be considered during the AMM process. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council give the Administrator any input they have regarding the qualities for nominees and any preferences they may have for nominees and that any official endorsement be delayed until the nominations are sent to the Metropolitan Council. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that Council give the Administrator any input They have regardTng the qualities for nominees and any preferences they may have for nominees and that any official endorsement be delayed until the nominations are sent to the Metropolitan Council. Ayes_, Nays _. TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator DATS: June 21, 1989 SUBJECT: Regional Transportation Board Appointments ATTACHMENT: A. AMM Memo Dated June 6, 1989 B. Shorewood Letter Dated June 19, 1989 C ISSUE - 1. Determine if any Orono CounciImember is interested in a nominationthe Regional Transportation Board. "to 2. Determine if the Council wants to undertake any endorsements in advance of: <<) AMM Board's selection h.) Metro Council selection INTRODUCTION - Transmitted previously to you by both the City^and probably the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities'was Attachment A which outlines the new way in which Board Members will be appointed to the Regional Transit Board. As noted a response was due to AMM by June 21st for those who were interested. DISCUSSION - The AMM has been asked to submit a maximum of two names for each Regional Transit District (which is composed of two Metro Council Districts.) As noted in the attached map of Attachment A, the Council nominee fron^th^s area will be from Metro Council Districts 9 and 13, which- eVtend: from Eden Prairie and Shorewood on the south to St. Francis in Anoka County on the north. As of June 21st the following individuals had submitted their names^to the AMM indicating their interest in appointment. Jan Haugen, Mayor, Shorewood Patricia Pidcock, Councilraeraber Eden Prairie ^ ihjiiuto. The AMM nominations will be submitted to the Metro Council, who will in turn select a Board member for each district. It should be noted that I am an AMM Board member and will be voting on the matter, at "T-a-v. J ALTERNATIVES - 1. Determine if any Orono Councilmember is interested. 2. Determine if the Council wants to undertake any endorsement prior to AMM action. 3. tniJeL keku whether the Council wants to do any endorsement action prior to Met Council selection once the two candidates are known from each district. 4. Table pending AMM action. 5. Comment to the City Administrator any interests or desires to be considered during the AMM process. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council give the Administrator any input they have regarding the qualities for nominees and any preferences they may have for nominees and that any official endorsement be delayed until the nominations are sent to the Metropolitan Council. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that Council give the Administrator any input TEey have regarding the qualities for nominees and any preferences they may have for nominees and that any official endorsement be delayed until the nominations are sent to the Metropolitan Council. Ayes _, Nays _. June 6, 1989 TO: Member City Officials FROM: Walt Fehst, President RE: MEMBERSHIP ON AMM LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEES AND NOMINATIONS TO THE REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD 1. REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD (RTB) NOMINATIONS* Recent legislation reorganizing the Regional Transit Board provides that of the new eleven member board, eight shall be appointed by the Metropolitan Council one each from the various council districts per the enclosed map. Of these eight, at least two must be elected county officials and four must be elected city or town officials. Various organizations representing counties and cities, including the AMM are required to provide the Metropolitan Council with at least two nominations for each position. This is a significant change from past philosophy. Recent AMM policy called for elected official direct participation on the Regional Transit Board. Legislators, including the principal authors, were concerned about the dedication and coBUDitment of time by elected officials and only after several strong assurances by AMM staff did they in fact establish an RTB with a majority of elected officials. The new RTB in addition to its previous tasks and duties, has regional planning and approval authority over LRT. Its responsibilities will include coordination of all transit, approval of LRT Grants, study and provision of increased suburban transit opportunity and overseeing a new LRT planning advisory group. A position on this new board will be challenging and will require a commitment on the part of those serving to be active participants. RTB members receive $50 per meeting not to exceed $50 per day and parking and travel expenses. The current board meets twice a month late Monday afternoon with subcommittee meetings following. However, meeting day, time and frequency will be at the discretion of the new board. The AMM board must make nominations to the Metropolitan Council by the last week of June. ACTION REQUESTED If you as an elected official or another elected official from your city or neighboring city wishes to serve on the RTB and can make the necessary time commitment, please indicate your interest to AMM President Wait Fehst or AMM staff no later than Wednesday, June 21, 19b9. Your request for nomination should be in the form of a letter to Walt Fehst in care of the AMM office at 183 University Ave., East, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 and accompanied by a resume of at least your governmental experience. Some discussion of your interest or previous involvement in transit and transportation issues would be helpful. 2. MEMBERSHIP ON AMM LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEES: THE AMM NEEDS YOUR HELP. GET INVOLVED AND BE PART OF THE AMM POLICY PROCESS AND REPRESENT YOUR CITY’S INTERESTS. We, as city officials, cannot afford to be silent. Please take a few minutes to read the brief description of the five standing policy committees (enclosed) and volunteer a small amount of your valuable time to make an impact by filling in and returning the attached form. The committees will meet in August and September approximately four times each year. The Board of Directors will be making two year appointments in late June and would like a clear indication of all persons who are willing to give a small part of their time and energy to serve on one or more of these committees. The Boarc would also welcome any suggestions for specific issues or concerns to be studied by the committees. If you have questions, please contact either Roger Peterson or Vern Peterson in the AMM Office (227-4008). DISTRIBUTION NOTE: Mayor, Councilmember, Managers, and Administrators will receive this Bulletin individually. However, if other city employees such as finance directors, housing officers, planners, etc. would like to serve on an AMM Committee, please submit their names. COMMITTEE DESCRIPTIONS: ll METROPOLITAN AGENCIES COMMITTEE Considers legislative issues and non-legislative issues related to the Metropolitan Council and Metropolitan Coooissions. The Connittee nonitors the structure and relationship between the regional entities and local units of government and reviews amendments to Metropolitan Development Guide Policy Chapters or any new chapters developed. In past years, the Committee has developed policy on land use planning, metropolitan significance, solid waste management. Met Council selection process, etc. It also reviewes the council's yearly budget. 2. MUNICIPAL REVENUES CONNITTEE Considers any matter concerning revenues, taxes, and city expenditures. Included are state aid formulas, stste aid dollars, levy limits, property tax assessments, and fiscal disparities. The Committee will be looking very carefully at the effects of the state aid formula and levy limit modifications as well as the new net tax capacity rates and the balance of aids/credits between the metro and outstate regions. 3. HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT % Concerns itse.lf with all issues related to economic development and housing including subsidized housing, affordable housing, and activities of the Metropolitan HRA. Reviews all amendments to the Metropolitan Council's Housing Guide Policy Chapter with particular emphasis on low and moderate income housing concerns. Will review legislation dealing with EDA's, HRA's, Tax Increment Financing (TIF) and Development authorities. 4. GENERAL LEGISLATION COMMITTEE Examine issues which have impact on metropolitan area cities outside the scope of other ANN committees. In the past, this Committee developed poli^ey on municipal self insurance, municipal consolidation, pensions, cable communications, PELRA Amendments, Comparable North, etc. 5. TRANSPORTATION CONNITTEE Studies all major Issues related to transportation and transit at the metropolitan, state and federal levels. The ten (10) elected officials who represent the ANM on the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) and the eight (8) city staff officials who represent the ANN on the Technical Advisory Committee (TAG) are encouraged to be members of this Committee along with other city officials. NAHE ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNCIPALITES (Please return by not later than June 21at.) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ CITY POISITON_ _ _ _ _ _ _ CITY PREFERRED MAILING ADDRESS (street) (city) PREFERRED TELEPHONE CONTACT NUMBER (zip code) PLEASE INDICATE COMMITTEE CHOICE (ISTfAriP 2ND.) Municipal Revenues_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Metropolitan Agencies Housing and Economic Development General Legislation_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Transportation_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ SUGGESTED ISSUES TO BE STUDIED PLEASE RETURN TO; Association of Metropolitan Municipalities 183 University Ave., East St. Paul, Minnesota 53101 Att: Carol Williams REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD DISTRICTS METROPOLITAN COUNCIL OF THE TWIN CITIES AREA r. irf/miKetn' 5 CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • SHOREWOOD. MINNESOTA 55331 • (612) 474-3236 June 19, 1989 Mayor James Grabek Mayor of Orono Box 66, Crystal Bay Orono, MN 55323 ii: 2 0 !PS9 JU.I RE; Appoincmenc to the Regional Transit Board I would like to be nominated for the vacancy on the Regional Tran sit Board. I believe my approach would assure that all aspects of transportation planning are considered when working for solutions to Regional transportation issues. I have been active in transportation issues, including the RTB Chairman's Advisory Board, the AI-IM Transportation Committee, the Hennepin County Light Rail Advisory Committee, and as a member of the Shorewood City Council since 1976. I have served on the City Council since 1976 - and as Mayor since January 1, 1989. I served on the Light Rail Advisory Committee for the S.W. Area since 1976. I have been on the Board of Directors of the AMM and served on the Revenue and Transportation and Metropolitan Issues committees. I have served on numerous League of Cities committees, was a founder and President of the Women in Government, served on the first Board of the Women Elected Officials of Minnesota, and a Metropolitan Council committee. I believe the RTB ought to be the "transportation" advisory board and take all modes of transportation and all means of dealing with transportation problems into account. My experience Ln highway, light rail, transit and transportation planning issues would be of great benefit to the Board. I seek coordination of transportation - not duplication. A Rjtidentia! Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore June 16, 1989 Page two I would greatly appreciate the endorsement of the AMM and your support throughout the selection process. I believe the issues before the RTB warrant the involvement of someone with my commit ment and my experience. Please note the Resolution of support from the Shorewood City Council and advise me if similar letters of support will enhance my candidacy. If you need additional information, please call me. Thank you very much, !ry tjajly yours , Citjy of Sh^ewood End. SESOLDTION NO. 47-89 A RESOLDTION SUPPORTING AND RECOMMENDING JAN HAUGEN MAYOR, CITY OF SHOREWOOD, FOR THE OPENING IN AREA F ON THE REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD WHEREAS, Jan Haugen, Mayor, Clcy of Slorewood, has serred on Che Cicy Council of Che CiCy of Shorewood since 3976; and, WHEREAS, Jan Haugen has bejn involved in transiC anJ cransporcacion planning issues as a member of Che Cicy Counci, and as Mayor since 1976; and, WHEREAS, Jan Haugen has served on Che RTB Chairman's Advisory Board; and, WHEREAS, Jan Haugen has served on Che ^MM Board and ics Revenue and Transporcacion commiccees; and, WHEREAS, Jan Haugen has served on Che Hennepin Councy LighC Rail Advisory commiccee for Che S.W. Area since 1976; and, WHEREAS, Jan Haugen has been involved in Councy, Mecropolican, and Scace organizacions as a founder and t^residenc of Che Women in GovernmenC, and as a founder and Board member of Women ElecCed Officials of Minnesoca, and on numerous League of Cicies and Mecropolican Council commiCCees; and, WHEREAS, Jan Haugen will consider all aspeccs of CransporCaCion in cransic planning. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by Che CiCy Council of Che CiCy of Shorewood, THAT, Che CiCy Council of Che Cicy of Shorewood recommends Jan Haugen for Che vacancy on Che Regional TransiC Board; and, THAT, Che Cicy Council of :he Cicy of Shorewood supporcs Che nominacion of Jan Haugen for Che vacancy on Che Regional TransiC Board chroughouc Cha seleccion process. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD Chis 12ch day of June, 1989. ATTEST? Sandra L. Kennelly, CiCy'Clerk 62189.2 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato DATS: June 21, 1989 SUBJECT: Navarre Redevelopment nxMai MEEim JUN 28 1989 CITY OF OftOHiO ATTACHMENTS: A. Handouts From June 1, 1989 Meeting ISSUE - Determine what direction that the Council desires to take on this issue. INTRODUCTION - At the meeting that was held regarding the Navarre redevelopment a presentation was made as to problems and possibilities together with discussing the range of alternatives the City could undertake and a range of alternatives for potential master planning or redevelopment. On behalf of the staff I would like to apologize for the breakdown in communications with the Planning Commission and others who were not fully informed of the meeting time and place. As you may be aware interested property owners were in attendance at that meeting indicating some of their needs and desires regarding the area. In addition City staff has been approached by a private development firm who has an interest in posplble redevelopment on the south side of County 15. DISCUSSION - As noted there is a growing interest in this area, not only from the City, but also from people currently in the area and others from outside the area. As discussed on the 1st the range of alternatives include: A. Beautification - "Spruce up" the area in an effort to promote the attractiveness of the area and therefore the business. The level of involvement in helping implement the Westonka Beautification Plan maybe an appropriate avenue at this level of involvement. B. Master Planning/Comprehensive Plan amendment - The current comprehensive plan an3~ zonlng for the area reflects what was in place at the time it was created. As noted in the attachments this is a hedge podge of zoning uses and that longterm there may be a more desireable land utilization in the area. One of the alternatives would be to undertake a master planning of the area to designate what the City would like to see in that area as land uses and as changes come along that they would need to fit into that plan. C. Participation and Redevelopment - A third alternative would be to actuaTTy participate in redevelopment either . *> on a case by case basis or in relation to achieving any master plan arrangements the City would desire. There does not seem to be substantial interest at this point in assisting any redevelopment, in part because of the experiences of a neighboring community. The issue regarding redevelopment may well be one of the extent of public participation needed in order to make the project work together with the . purity guarentee given for the public participation by the ^eloper. (Presently the party interested in redevelopment is working on general estimates to determine the extent of assistance needed in order to undertake redevelopment of the south side.) ACTION - 1. Make available an opportunity for those not present on the June 1st meeting to hear the presentation. 2. Undertake a discussion on the next steps. 3. Take no action. 4. Table. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the opportunity be made aval lable for the presentation for those interested. It could possibly be as part of a joint Planning Comraission/Counci1 meeting tentatively scheduled for Saturday, July 29. In addition that meeting could include discussion of further steps. Further topics could include financial and other related information on the facilities study. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by _, th Council direct staff to set anotTier presentation of ^ /arre redevelopment information together with setting a time for further discussions with Planning Commission on the direction for Navarre. Ayes __, Nays __. Planning Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Planning & Zoning Asst. Administrator John Shardlow, Dahlgren, Shardlow and Uban 4rfflC(tiieur A NAVARRE AREA WORKSHOP r;£ETING so A joint meeting to discuss the future of the Navarre cornmerciai area. oc >- Qo . i—Oi tu O M—o < > cr ^ < o ujtn or "T >><2><b <2 2< §o0^i^o CITY OF ORONO NAVARRE AREA STUDY ANALYSIS SUMMARY County Road 19 Area Inadequately and unscreened parking, loading and storage result in clutter Redundant and poorly placed curb cuts result in access/circulation conflicts Aging and deteriorating buildings and parking result in an image of decline Excessive and competitive signage add clutter and confusion Lack of safe pedestrian crossings isolate and divide this area Small parcels limit expansion and redevelopment flexibility and have resulted in crowded, out of scale development, parking and setback problems Existing development exhibits lack of unity or positive character and little sense of community Significant wooded areas buffer the existing land use transitions and require sensitive development Ctisco Point Road Area Inadequately screened and unscreened parking, loading and storage result in visual clutter Redundant and poorly placed curb cuts result in access and circulation conflicts Aging and low quality comm.ercial/industrial uses counteract the positive influence of better development Mixing of incompatible uses contributes to conflicts and disorder Small parcels limit expansion and redevelopment flexibility and result in crowded and out of scale development, and parking/setback problems Turning conflicts occur at all major intersections Lack of safe pedestrian crossings isolate and divide this area Inadequate screening and buffering of new development/redevelopment perpetuates harsh edges and transitions Dunwoodv Aveimc Area Inadequate^ screened and unscreened parking, storage and operations result in clutter and objectionable views Poorfy placed curb cuts result in drculation/tuming conflicts near Dunwoody Isolated industrial/commercial uses discourage adj'acent development and contribute to image problems Substandard structures, poor signage and a lack of maintenance counteract positive affects of better developments Wetland areas require preservation and sensitive adjacent development Lack of safe pedestrian crossings isolate and divide has area CTTYOFORONO NAVARRE AREA STUD Y PRELIMINARY LAND USE ALTERNATIVE A CftWn tY Area Expand and concentrate commercial Develop mult^le residential to support commercial Place commercial with buildings set back to maximize developable area Revise street system to increase developable area, and reduce access and land use conflicts Preserve woodland and wetland buffers Develop open space corridors Develop and implement performance standards to reduce visual and operational conflicts CaKcn Point Road Area Expand and concentrate office Revise street system to enlarge office area and reduce access and land use conflicts Develop and implement performance standards to reduce visual and operational conflicts » Avenue Area Do single family around wetland Develop new park as part of wetland and open space system Develop office use at Dunwoody to buffer the county maintenance facility Combine city and county maintenance operations Develop and implement performance standards to reduce visual and operational conflicts CTTYOF ORONO NAVARRE AREA STUDY PRELEMWARY LAND USE ALTERNATIVE B (^nnty Road 19 Area Expand and concentrate commercial Place commercial toward the front of the lot to maximize village image Develop loop road to serve commercial from the rear Develop mult4)lc residential and office to support the commercial High quality multiple residential to capture lake and open space views Revise the street ^em to reduce access and land use conflicts Preserve woodland and wetland buffers Develop open space corridors Develop and implement strict development standards to reduce visual and operational problems Point Road Area Expand and concentrate office Develop multiple residential adjacent to Co. Rd. 15 Maintain Casco Point Road/Blaine Avenue intersection for possible signalization Develop and implement strict development standards to reduce visual and operational problems Dnnwoodv Avenue Area Relocate combined county and city maintenance facihties Preserve woodland buffer Revise access road and restore wetlands Redevelop county site to single family Concentrate access at Dunwoody and improve intersection Develop and implement strict development standards to reduce visual and operational problems CnYOFCRONC NAVARRE AREA STUDY PRELIMINARY LAND USE ALTERNATIVE C rniintv Road 19 Area Expand and concentrate commercial at Co. Rd. 19 Place commercial toward the street frontage to maximize visibility and the small town image Design the street system to control access and land use conflicts Develop multiple residential and offio^ support commercial uses High quality multiple residential to capture lake/open space vies Develop and implement strict development standards to reduce visual and operational problems Development should enhance the areas image Preserve woodland and wetland buffers, develop open space systems Casco Point Road Area Expand and concentrate office at Casco Point Road Design street system to enlarge office area and reduce access and land use conflicts Develop and implement strict development standards to reduce visual and operational problems Dunwoodv Avenue Area Relocate county and city maintenance facilities Develop multiple residential adjacent to County Road in and around the wetland Restore wetlai^d and incorporate it into the open space system Develop single family on county property abutting existing single family Develop a ^tem of streets to concentrate access at Dunwoody and control land use/traffic conflicts Improve the Dunwoody intersection Develop and implement strict development standards to reduce visual and operational problem:: 62139.4 W TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat DATE: June 21, 1989 SUBJECT: Water Conservation Regulati/;><1^ COUNCIL MEETING JUN 2 S 1989 CITY OF ORONO ATTACHMENTS: A. Water Regulations Memo. a ted 3/23/89 ISSUE - Determine if the Council would desire to remove or modify the odd/even watering regulations currently in force. INTRODDCT". - At the Council's March 27, 1989 meeting Council reinstat* ,£ watering regulations for the year because of the continui oncern regarding water supplies. DISCUSriCN - When originally placed on the agenda for this meeting there had been adequate rainfall (although not above normal) however, this has been tapering off and there has been no significant positive change in the level of Lake Minnetonka. The item is presented to determine if the Council would like to do anything at this point, and if not the water regulations will stay in force. ALTERNATIVES 1. Choose to take no action this point. 2. Repeal the regulations. 3. Modify the regulations. 4. Table for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that action on this item be tab ie‘3 until the August 14, 1989 meeting. To see if substantially more rainfall than normal has accumulated. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _ seconded by_, to table tMs item until the August 14, 1989 Council meeting. Ayes* _, Nays _. cc: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director Melvin Kilbo, Police Chief Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zonl tg Administrator 32389.2 TO: * Mayor and City Council Bernhardson, City Administrato DATS: March 23, 1989 SUBJECT: Water Conservation Restrictions ^(rrrtQMjevJT /i Attachment: A. Odd/Even Outdoor Water Usage Regulations Memo Dated 3/8/89 INTRODUCTION - Attachmen» meeting with a recommence meeting. s presented at your March 13, 1989 to table consideration until this RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended, based on the continued low lake levels and the fact that there has not been substantial rainfall sinc:‘ last summer, that these regulations be continued. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by that the Orono Council concurs with the reimposition of water conservation regulation as set forth in Resoltuion #2496. Ayes __, Nays __. 388< : f Mayor and City Council March 8. A'J“ini3trato}^>^_ /lTnpc.(HMt SrajECT, odd/Even Outdoor Water rr tisage Regulations ^/Ty'Of Attachments, a. Ordinance #53 , Ordinance ' water tJse contr ,B. Resolution 42d7o „ . ControlB. Sesolulion #2479 Ad <=• ‘*oor“l^^"® ^ ««-'^'=ory odd/Even ffirur « «at« usa|e*r?gji.ff daaliaa to h& -::::: r. 9 these restrictions un^^^ t Council ALTO r^IVes - ^ IS' able for further discussion. 2- Reconsider. Repeal. r.eavo as is. ^^commendation - T^ • P'^ior to that meeting. proposed motion „ CRDINA^TCZ SO ScCCMD SERI / A WATER USE CONTROL CRDINPCICE REOULATING THE USE OF WATER DURING PERIODS OF WATER SHORTAGE . The City Council of the City of Orcno ordains as follows Section 3:io language is amended by adding the following Section 1. Purpose. In order to avoid a watar shortage due to inadequate capacity in water systsas, to ensure an adecuata water supply for fire protection, to protect the environment of Lake Minnetonka, to ensure the protection of subterranean aquifers, to maintain the quality of domestic water supplies, and to protect the general health, safety and welfare of the residents, the following regulations on non-essential water uses shall apply during periods of water shortages. Section 2. Implementation of Restrictions. Whenever the City Council shall determine that a shortage of water threatens the City, it may enact by resolution the restrictions for non-essential water use sez forth in this; ordinance. The resolution shall become effective 24 hours after passage and publication. The resolution shall contain the following information: (1) uses of water that will be restricted; (2) (2) (4) (6) Section 3. types of water supply which will be restricted, such as the public water system, private walls, lake or other surface watar system; times during which the restriction will apply; whether the use restrictions will apply to all property in the City or will vary depending upon location or identification of property? when the restrictions will be implemented and when they will terminate; and whether the restrictions will be voluntary or ii oluntary. Notice. Whenever the City Council enacts the restrictions in this ordinance, it shall take such action as is reasonably practicable to notify the general public of the restrictions- The notice shall be posted on the City's bulletin beard and shall be published in the local newspaper. The notice shall include the information described in Section 2 (1-6). 1 Sttction 4 , Typts of Water Supolv. Thm r««trictions in this ordinance shall, at the d^«cration of the City Council, apply to the public water system, private wells, lake or other surface water systems, or any combination thereof. Section 5 . Restrictions, During a water shortage the City Council may order one or any combination of the following restrictions: (1) a complete or partial ban on water use for watering lawns, trees and shrubs, irrigation, car washing, filling swimming pools, air conditioning, other uses determined by the City to be non-essential, or any combination thereof. (2) an odd/even watering ban in which residents of addresses ending in an even digit may water on even-numbered calendar days and residents of addresses ending in an odd digit may water on odd-numbered calendar days; (3) a limitation of water use for specified hours of the day; (4) a voluntary or involuntary restriction; (5) a use restriction applicable to all or part of the City or based on land use or property identification; and (6) any other appropriate restriction. Newly seeded or sodded lawns shall be exempt from these provisions for a period of 30 days after installation, although no new seeding or sodding may begin after any applicable water use restriction is instituted. in f 1 “!-* public syst«n in Orono whlxopinion of th. Administrator or his d.sian.. that munieinai '■••f*’*** “*• point that it could «idang.r^Si^ Thls^would ■5***/®' *1 ” protaction purposes. Section 6. Termination . Any water use restrictions imposed by the Council during a water shortage shall terminate by resolution of the City Council. -2- section 7. Sffgetivc Date . This ardinanct shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. ADOPTED this 25th day of of ______4______ Ayes and July 1988 by a vote Nays MayorI [ City Cleric S087j QHQKCSi City of OHOIV Hrrfiame^OT^ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC! NO. 2479________ A HBSOtOTIOH ADOPTING A MANPATORT WHEREAS, the City of Ocono has a significant ongoing concern regarding its water resources; and aam>va<;. the Citv of Orono has reflected that concern in i». !3. "« »«• “““ “ •" amendment to the code Section 3.IS; and WHEREAS, the precipitation for 1988 is significantly below normal as was 1987; and WHESSAS, recent rains have helped concern, however, there is still a substantial concern for the longterm situation. i]mi7i>i«9nR8 BE IT RESOLVED» that in accordance second SerWs, Section 5 and is effective upon the Ordinance publication. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 25th day of July, 1988. l^SJames R- Gtabek, Mayor fr'Th .-)i2^yA:^ orothy Halim, City Clerk i —:aHONCE ^ - M City of OROrVC ^rrAQ-UmsT d. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 2496NO. BOT RE-IMPOSING THEM APRIL 1S» 1985 sourcs of water; and WHEREAS, the City did such because of significant dry conditions; and demand for water is marJcedly decreased, an WHEREAS, the City still maintains a concern for its on-going water resources. I.O.. .= ” SOdd/even outdoor water usage regulations r er.ec^ further be it resolved that the City re-i»poses these regulations on April 15, 1989. .988. Adopted by the Orono City Co-mcil on this 12th day of September, yOd'fotny allin, Cit^lerJc T im_____ R. GraOeKr Mayor TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat DATS: June 20, 1989 SUBJECT: 1990 Budget Guidelines (Revised) COUHCIL MEETMG JUN 2S 1989 ^OFOROHO Attachment: A. Budget Guidelines 1990 (REVISED) Dated 6/20/89 ISSUE - Presentation of revised guidelines as a result of the (Governor's veto of the tax bill. INTRODUCTION - The previously submitted guidelines had been prepared prior to the veto. While no one is yet certain as to the most appropriate to proceed given the confusion at the state level and possible special session, I hope to get greater direction at the League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Wrap-up next week. ALTERNATIVES - 1. Accept the revised Information. 2. Discuss all issues upon desires. 3. Table for further word on the property tax direction. RECOMMENDATION - It is after discussing any issues regarding the upcoming budget, recommended that it be tabled to 7/10/89 for further Informational updates. In order for the City to conform to the 1988 tax law truth in taxation requirements (which neither the counties or state could meet) the Council may have to adopt a maximum tax levy by Augusr 1st which can later be revised downward prior to October. cc: All Dept. Heads 52289.4(36) tS) ;Cj«U33 Mavor amMayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City AdministratoiSA^ ^ 1989 SUBJECT: Budget Guidelines 1990 (Revised) Attachment: A. City of Orono Statistical Chart Updated 5/89 ISSUE - Presentation of general comment and amendment for the upcoming 1990 budge y INTRODUCTION - As was done last year again presented to Council for review and comment cart of the budget process. This is done again to solicit from Council priorities, guidelines and issues that they feel are important for the upcoming budget. The City will undertake the State mandated Truth in ffx the firU time during the 1990 budget. Because of tjie complex nature of it in implementing it, the State ^®9islature has modified some of the features and the timeframes for payable 1990. The Governor chose to veto the bill and the be followed are presently uncertain. To be safe however. City should set its mill rate by August 10, 1989 and be sent out to the taxpayers as to the impact of during September - October 1989 with public hearings be held in the October - November timeframe. (This may be altered as State provides additional information. It ®*y ‘>®ts whether a special session is held.) Because of the levy limits established by the State and the fact that they past eight years limited cities to their previous /ears actual levies, it would be prudent for Orono together with bh« other cities in the State to levy their maximum in order to ratal flexibility in the future. In addition the levy limit establishment for 1990 will be substantially below the anticipated inflation rate. discussion - ECONOMIC OUTLOOK - The United States economy continues to expand at slower rates although the expected recession is ®till not on the horizon. Positive notes have included ^he decreasing trade deficit because of expanded exports together with efforts to slow torn growth through interest rates. The "®^®J=^^® !^^ns have been inflation rates for 1988 of 4.4%, and inflation rate for 1989 above 5% with little decrease for 1990. Recent leading economic indicators ®°"tinue showing some strength for the continued growth in the economy, although efforts to slow inflation have also tended to limit growth. While the trade deficit has shown Improvement ^«®®"| months, a worsening of that because of a stronger dollar together with the Federal deficit not being dealt with could bring the long predicted recession sometime in 1990. Some maintain we are currently going through a rolling recession or depression as there are sectors of the economy which are hit for various reasons such as the energy downturn for the last four or five years following downturns in the "rust ’ elt". As is true with the national economy, the Minnesota economy particularly in the Metro area has continued to expand. The problem however, has been a growing sentiment for taxpayer revolt particular!ly regarding property taxes. The Minnesota Miracle which was initiated in the early *70*s, has now become a victim of its own success. The Legislature continues to use bandaids attempting to solve the expenditure driven formulas, particularly in trying to keep taxes down in the Out State area. This complicated system however, has become unpredictable. Property tax reform that was passed in 1988 for 1989 resulted in tax increases, not cnly in the Metro suburban area, but in the areas Out St • that are substantially more than Legislators had anticip. This c.,'used the 1989 Legislature to moderate these increases by additional State monies being poured into property tax relief together with making the levy limits and expenditures as tight as possible for local units of government. This attempt was hoped to have property taxes at a palatable level for 1990 in advance of the 1990 elections. It was anticipated that the 1990 Legislature will work to get money into programs that they have held back on in *89 in hopes of making a positive impressici on property taxpayers together with constituent support groups that have not received much during 1989. With the Governor's veto and possible special session which may undertake a substantial change in direction for 1990, this may be significantly altered. Regardless of a sepcial session a significant recession in the latter part of *89 into the early part of *90 may cause rubstantial problems in funding these relief and expenditure measures. For Orono the tight levy limit is exacerbated by the need for selected expenditure increases during 1990. This will result in a rather tight budget year in 1990. A recession may materialize because of higher interest rates, at least in the housing sector. This could cause a downturn in construction activity as could a general recession. Price Increases in current items primarily in the energy sector will translate into unit costs for these products that are higher than the rate of inflation. GOALS - Primary budgetary goals for 1990 include: - Continued utilization of a capital budget framework which may include the following projects for 1990: Old Crystal Bay/Bridge Replacement North Ferndale/MSA Willow Drive/Seal Coating Projects in either 1989 or 1990 Frontage Roads - Highway 12 (North/South) water Tower - Highway 12 City Facilities - Undertaking a facilities improvement and any initial financing of that undertaking. - Continued exploration of user fees. - No new programs requiring additional funding. - Continued control of legal services expenditures. REVENUES - - Property tax revenue limits for 1989 include the 3% levy limit cap plus 1/2 growth in the households which for Orono will be about a 3.6% increase. The City is expecting no addition in State Aids. This maybe reduced to as little as 3%. - Fees and Charges. It is anticipated that given the inflationary rate that these charges should be increased in the range of 4-5%. INVESTMENTS- - The higher interest rates for City investments, which have been over 9% during 1989, may de\:rease to 8% during 1990 as inflationary pressures lessen. (The City's over all investment return in 1988 was 8.4%.) - Intergovernmental revenue will stay at approximately the seune plateau. UNDESIGNATED FUND BALANCE - - For the 1989 budget the City placed $100,000 into undesignated reserve for budget expenditures earmarked for the building fund. This was done in partial expectation of making a "reserve appeal" for 1990. This avenue for increasing the City's levy base was not continued for 1990. It is recommended however, that another allocation be made for 1990 in case the appeal will be available for 1991. EXPENDITURES - It is anticipated that inflation for 1990 will be in the 4% range. Given the levy limit of 3-3.6% and the funds for current personnel, who are not at their position top step, it is anticipated that a 2.5-3% increase in salaries will be all that is financially feasable for 1990. This is in light of increases in oil and other energy related expenditures plus increases in health insurance that are anticipated to markedly exceeded the base inflation rate. END OF YEAR BALANCE - During the past five years the actual revenues have exceeded the amount actually expended^ by over $200,000. This has been narrowing every year as we have increased the investment amount to a more realistic figure in the revenue projections. It is anticipated the 1989 difference will be $80,000. The budget for 1990 will have no expectation for any excess. This is particularly true if there is a downturn in building activity together with the anticipated need to start using undesignated balance for facilities improvement. FUND BALANCE Because of the tenor of the Legislature, there is an expectation that undesignated reserves may become a target in upcoming Legislative sessions. In light of this and the need for facilities it would be prudent to designate these monies to the building fund during 1989 in order that they do not become the basis for reductions in the City's ability to levy or limit State Aids. ORGANIZATIONAL STRENGTH The organization is at a high state of productivity and because of tight budgeting has not added personnel since the 1986 Budget. Various task additions or expansions have been discussed at a staff level as possible position areas in the next few years. Some of these tasks may require a full position others combine in various ways for additional positions. Police Supervisor - (The 3rd Lieutenant) (If done within the current authorized strength would not be a substantial cost.) Engineering - In a review of its engineering services, the City may add this function to an existing position, eventually blending it with the Public Works Director position should it chose to lesse i reliance on a consulting engineering firm. Administrative Assistance -Tasks in this area would include assistance to the department heads and the administrator in areas of new projects, personnel, labor relations, insurance and management information systems (computers). Clerical Assistance - At a minimum it is anticipated that additional hours will be required to again strengthen this area. This may include assistance in both the general clerical and financial areas. Assessing Function - Because of the growing complexity of the tax system particularly in appraising Orono the current contract Assessor has indicated he does not desire to undertake Orono in the future. Monies that have used to may be need to hire City's own Assessor and clerical assistance. As an alternative he maybe willing to do a phase out through the end of the year so that City can transition to an inhouse or another contract assessor. Other reliable contractors however, may not be available and an inhouse function (perhaps with contracts to selected communities) may be a better alternative than contracting with the County. Plumbing Inspection Assistance - To the extent that the City is required to have a licensed master plumber, the City may need to provide this in an alternative way until its inspectors are qualified. This may be done through utilization of summer employment funds as such a person would also be involved in the septic testing program. To the extent that these are new positions the City currently is extremely limited in space within which these additional functions could work. Funding may also be a limiting factor in progress on these needs. ALTERNATIVES - 1. Discuss jointly giving comments as to additional or altered directions the Council would desire to take during 1990 budget. 2. Discuss these individually with the staff. 3. Table for further discussion. 4. Accept the information as presented. 5. Take no action. ^COMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council give their individual thoughts to staff regarding budget guidelines and that if appropriate that it be discussed at the first meeting in July. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by_ _ _ that the Council accept the information and present th«^»* directions to staff with perhaps tabling of the item for future .scussion. Ayes _, Nays 62189.5 O TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrate DATE: June 21, 1989 SUBJECT: Audit Presentation CMINCIl MEETWe JUN 2 i 1989 CITY OF ORONO O o ATTACHMENTS: A. 1988 Audit Report/Pannell Kerr Forster ISSUE - Presentation of the audit report to the Council. INTRODUCTION - Annually in June the Council is presented with the audit statement for the past year. DISCUSSION - The audit statement is presented to the Council at this meeting which allows them the opportunity to review it and should they desire, the Auditor would be able to be present at the Council's July 10, 1989 meeting. In addition, following the June 26th meeting staff will transmit to Council the annual management letter from the auditor and at either the July 10th or July 24th meeting will place the summary for publication in the newspaper for the Council to review prior to publication. ALTERNATIVES 1. Indicate to staff any questions, issues and areas desiring further clarification. 2. Indicate whether ■ y CounciImembers would like to have the auditors present to discuss the issues. 3. Table any discussion on the matter until the July 10th meeting. 4. Accept the information. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council indicate any questions or areas that they would like to have addressed and either staff will address those or have the auditors available for the July 10th meeting. If any CounciImember would like to have Lhe auditor available, please let staff know by Thursday, July 5th. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by __, seconded by __, that the Council after discussing the issues that they may have table the item until the July 10, 1989 meeting. cc: Ken Malloy, Pannell, ^arr Forster Tom Kuehn, Finance Di 5Ctor o cmaiKnM JtM2ll989 CITY OF 00QMb«9.in> Mark E. Bernhardson, City Adminlatrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Diractor June 23, 1989 Woodhill Avenue - Assessment Hearing Date It !• now ‘ >r>-‘ ‘14 Tot Wrtmt Dates Subjects Due to the completion of Woodhi11 Avenue, appropriate to set an assessment public hearing date. R.co.-nd.tlo« - TO s.t August 28. 1989 .t 7,00 p.«. •• th. asseaamcnt public hearing date for Woodhill Avenue. Proposed Notion - Moved by _ _. seconded by —3-' 28, 1989 at 7:00 p.m. as the aaaeasment hearing date for Woodhill Avenue. Ayes ___» nays ___• O' Mayor Grabek s Orono Council Members From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administi itor Forwarded recommending approval. O o COUNCa MCETII6 JUN 2(1989 cmroF Hark B. Bemhardsonr City Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director June 23* 1989 ^62389.IHD Sobjacts Public Information Meeting - Highway 12 Improvements The Minnesota Department of Transporation has conducted e public hearing regarding improvements to Highway 12 from North Brown Road to Old Crystal Bay Road. Because the City of Orono must either approve or disapprove of the plan^ it is necessary to conduct a public information meeting. ■ecoBendation - To set July 2A, 1989 at 7:00 p.m. as the time and date for a public information meeting regarding proposed improvements to Highway 12. seconded by to set July 24rProposed Notion - Moved by _ _ _ _ 1989 at 7:00 p.m. as the time and date for a public information meeting regarding proposed improvements to Highway 12. Ayes _ _, nays_ _. Tot Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Promt Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Forwarded recommending approval. o nUMMIKCnM JUN2<19$9 cmroronno TOx nont DATBt Mayor and City Council Mark E. Barnhardson, City Adminlstrato June 20, 1989 SUBJECT! Facilities Tour - Thursday 6/29/89 - 12 Noon (Please bring this with you to the tour) Attachments: A. Boarman Itinerary of Tour B. Facilities Tour Memo Dated 6/8/89 ISSUE - Presentation of information related to the tour of facilities on Thursday, June 29, 1989. INTRODUCTION - Attached is the itinerary for the tour. Please A bus will bemeet at Orono Council Chambers at 12 noon. available for the tour. A box lunch will be available. Please let us know by Monday night if you will be able to attend. Planning Commission members have beer, individually contacted on Thursday, June 22nd, in addition to being sent a copy of this memo. Recommendstion - No formal action is required. cc: Planning Commission Department Heads ORONO STUDY T0UR0M*UN« FACILmES miRSDAY, JUNE »TH tiO.\KN'AN>- ASSOt. . ‘ «t ( S(.INt ‘ H'N' N •* 12:00 12:15-12:45 1:15-2:00 2:30-3:00 3:30-4:00 4:30-5:00 TOUB GBOOP meets at ORONO OTY MALL - SO U«I M.NNelOt«A POBUC SAFETY BLOO. ^ >»» ■O' "'=‘“ ^ PHONE; 474-3261PHONE; 474^2t)i PUBUC SAFETY BUILDING (NEW FACIUTY) $65 00 S.F. CHAMPUN MUNIOPAL FA^ES SS .'S ty AOM.«T»TO. phone 421-8100rnwiNt CITY MAU'POUCE (EXPANSION/REMODEUNG) $62.30 S F. PUBUC WORKS (NEW FACIUTY) $36.50 S.F. PHONE; 452-1850 CITY HAa/POUCE (NEW FACIUTY) $76 25 S.F. phone 890-1045 OTY HAa/POUCE (NEW FACIUTY) $68.M-$TO.OO S.F. ?(]wJ^OflKS (NEW FACIUTY) $41.60 S.F. (OPTIONAL) CHASKA PUBUC WORKS ■ ST.EET SUET. PHONE: 474-3261 PUBUC WORKS FACIUTY (NEW) $41.50 S.F. return TO ORONO .A^.- !■> •' -•-••>54. i^s .. ^ ^ Ki n r r h 2nd S I r e t I n n e J p ^3 I I s M , n n e s o t a 5 5 4 (M 6 12-33 ^ , :v Tot Mayor Grabok ft Orono Council Membars FroBs John R- Garhardaon, Public Worka Director Datai June 8^ 1989 Subject I Pad li ty/Tour ^6^ $889.IBD CMiaUKnM I* ’ JUN121^ ciry Of 08080 H* h.v« tMtativ.ly •«h«dul«d Thuriday, ^ 1»»» baginning at noon to raviaw tha following City facllitiaa Mandota Halghtt - Public Worka, Polica and Adminlatratlon Savaga - Public Worka, Polica and Adminiatration Chanplin - Public Worka, Polica and Adminlatratlon South Laka Minnatonka Police - Polica Facility Only Wa will contract for a achool bua for tranaportatlon and provida bo* lunchaa and a bavaraga. maconandation - To aat ’^‘‘“raday, Juna 29, 1989 aa tha data to tour and review the above City facilities- nifa'a^^^h^U?* ;o“?o;r ^i;d-«ViVw%^^:^b^v5-t'ity nlilitill: Ayes _ _F nays _ _. : ‘ tfr COUNCIL MEETING TO: PROM: JUN 2 8 1989 Mark E. Bernhardson, City AdmionistratorCITY OF OMNO Jonn R. Gernhardson, Public Works Director DATE;June 22, 1989 SUBJECT: Performance Review & Salary Adjustment ^ Barry Rathbun# Maintenance Worker Public Works On July 13, 1988, Barry Rathbun began employment with th« City of Orono as a maintenance worker in the Public Worker Department. Barry has performed very well in all phases of Public HorkS Maintenance to date and has attended the necessary sanitary sew«r collection system schools as required. Recommendation - To adjust Barry Rathbun'S houi ly rate to 11*23 per hour effective July 13, 1989 which is Step III of the City o£ Orono Compensation Plan and to review salary and performance In 6 months. Proposed Motion; Moved by seconded by to adjust Barry Rathbun’s hourly rate to $11.23 per hour effective July 13, which is step III of the City of Orono Compensation Plan and to review salary and performance in 6 months. Ayes _ _, nays _ _. TO: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members FROM: Mark E. Eernhardson, City Administrate Forwarded recommending approval. o o mm lUrk B. B«mhardson, City Admionlstrator John R. Gornhardson, Public Works Director jm 2 C 1989 CITYOFOIIOM June 22, 1989 Performance Review 8 Salary Adjustment Maintenance Worker Public Works - Randy 0*Brian, On July 13, 1988, Randy O'Brian began employment with the City of Orono as a maintenance worker in the Public Worker Department* Randy has performed very well in all phases of Public Works Maintenance to date and has attended the necessary sanitary sewer collection system schools as required. Recommendation - To adjust Randy O'Brian's hourly rate to 11*23 per hour effective July 13, 1989 which is Step III of the City of Orono Compensation Plan and to review salary and performance in 6 months. Proposed Motiont Moved by _, seconded by _ _, to adjust Randy O'Brian's hourly rate to $11.23 per hour effective July 13, which is step III of the City of Orono Compensation Plan and to review salary and performance in € months* Ayes _ _, nays _ _. Mayor Grabek 8 Orono Council Members Mark B. Bemhardson, City Administrate Forwarded recommending approval. o . ,1 62089.1 coownmnw /r JUN 2(1989 CITY OF (MONO Nark £. Bernhardson, City Administrator Dorothy Ballin, City Clerk June 20f 1989 Performance Review - Laurie Scheffler, City Recorder ISSUE - Performance review and end of probationary period, DISCUSSION - As of July 11, 1989, Laurie will have completed one year ol employment with the City. During this time she has completed two performance reviews in which her performance has been rated at the expected range or above. Laurie continues to expand her knowledge of office procedures relating to; recording the Council and Planning Commission minutes, issuing building permits, scheduling inspections, use of the cash register, special assessment searches and answering general questions from the public. She has an interest and understanding of the progress of land use aplications from their initial application, staff review, Planning Commission review and final action by the Council. She has taken the initiative to work a split shift after each Council and Planning Commission meeting during the busy summer months in an effort to complete the minutes with no interruptions. Laurie gees along well with the other City employees and the public. She has become a valuable addition to the clerical staff. RECOMMEKDATION - It is recommended that Laurie's salary be increased fr-om $9.118/Hr to $9. 972/Hr (Level 4 - Step II) effective Ju.y 11, 1989. It is further acknowledged that Laurie has complet«?d her one year probationary period. TO; FROM: Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat Forwarded recommending approval. The increase is according to the adopted compensation plan and is within budgeted amounts. O Laurie Scheffler Personnel File Tom Kuehn 62189.7 COUNCH im MTBi Mayor and City Council Mark B. Barnhardson, City Adainistratol^l^^^ Juna 21, 1989 JUM 2* 1989 CITY OF QMNO BUBJKTs Liquor Ordinanca Changa ATTACHMENT: A. Proposad Liquor Ordinanca Aaandaant B. Maao on Changas - Minnasota Statuta Datad 8/7/89 ISSUE - Nhathar Council deslras to allow Off-Sala liquor atoras to ba opan on Naw Years Day and Fourth of July and extend the On- Sala of intoxicating salt liquor on Sundays to 1 A.M. Monday, as allowed by the 1989 Legislative change. INTRODUCTION - At the Council's aaating of June 12, 1989 Attachaant A was presented as inforaation and tabled to this aaating. ALTERNATIVES 1. Adopt as presented. 2. Modify and adopt delineating any of the following: a. Naw Year's Day/Off Sale b. 4th of July/Off Sale c. Sunday On Sale to 1 A.N. Monday 3. Taka no action. 4. Table for further discussion. R3KOMMENDATION * It is recoaaanded that the proposed ordinanca ba adopted as presented. Tabling until July 10th will preclude the sale on the Fourth by the Off Sale in Navarre. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the proposed Ordinance No. _ _, Second ~?aries amending"The liquor ordinanca be adopted. Ayes _, Nays _. cc: Off-Sale Liquor Licensee On-Sale Liquor Licensee Chief Kilbo 62089.: ORDINANCE NUMBER , SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTTONF 4.31 LIQUOR LICENSE RESTRICTIONS AND REGULATIONS - OFF-SALE .i:,yOR AND WINE, SUBD. 18; 4.32 HOURS AND DAYS OF LIQUOR SALES, 0; AND 4.33 SUNDAY SALES, OF ORDINANCE NO. 32, SECOND SERX APOt’TED MARCH 17, 1987, AND ENTITLED "INTOXICATING AND NON- ATOXIC ATI NG LIQUOR LICENSING AND REGULATION." The City Council of Orono ordains; Ordinance No. 32, Second Series jdopted March 17, 1987, and entitled "Intoxicating and Ncn-Intoxicating Liquor Licensing and Regulation" is amended to read; Section 4.31, Liquor License Regulations - Off-Sale Liquor and Wine.Restrictions and Subd. 18. An off-sale licensee may provide samples of wine, liqueurs, and cordials which the licensee currently has in stock and is offered to the general public without obtaining an additional 1 icense prov iding that the wine, liqueur, and cordial samples are dispensed at no charge and consumed on a licensed premise during the permitted hours of off-sale in a quantity less than 100 milliliters of malt liquor per variety per. customer, 50 milliliters of wine per variety per customer, and 25 milliliters of liqueur or cordial per variety per customer. Section 4.32. Hours and Days of Liquor Sales. Subd. 2. Off-sale. No off-sale of liquor shall be made before 8:00 o’clock A.M. or after 8;00 o'clock P.M. of any except Friday and Saturday on which days may be made until 10:00 o'clock P.M, No off-sale shall be made on Thanksgiving Day; or Christams Day, December 25; but on the evenings preceding such days, if the sale of liquor is not otherwise prohibited on such evenings, off-sales may be made until 10:00 o'clock P.M. Section 4.33, Sunday Sales. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, a Sunday on-sale license may be issued to hotels, motels and restaurants, as herein defined, which have on- sale liquor licenses, to serve liquor between the hours of 10:00 o’clock A.M. Sunday and 1;00 o’clock A.M. Mondays in conjunction with the serving of food, provided that the licensee establishment is in conformance with the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act. This ordinance becomes effective after its passage and iication on July 3, 1989. Passed by the council this 26th day of June 1989. James R. Grabek, Mayor ATTEST: Oorotny M. Hallin^ City Clerk Published in the Laker/Pioneer newspapers the week of July 3, 1969. ] 4.32 SBC. 4.32. HOURS AMD DAYS OP LIQUOR SALBS. Subd. 1. On-sale. No on-sale of liquor shall be made between 1:00 o'clock A.M. on Sunday, nor until 8:00 o'clock A.M. on Monday, nor after 8:00 o'clock P.M. on December 24. No on- sale of liquor shall be made between the hours of 1:00 o'clock A.M. and 8:00 o'clock A.M. on any weekday or Saturday. Subd. 2. Off-sale. No off-sale of liquor shall be made before 8:00 o'clock A.M. or after 8:00 o'clock P.M. of any day, except Friday and Saturday on which days may be made until 10:00 o'clock P.M. No off-sale shall be made on Thai'.ksgiving Day; or Christmas Day, December 25; but on the evenings preceding such days, if the sale of liquor is not otherwise prohibited on such evenings, off-sales may be made until 10:00 o'clock P.M. SBC. 4.33. SUNDAY SALBS. Notwithstanding anything herein tc the contrary, a Sunday on-sale license may be issued to hotels, motels and restaurants, as herein defined, which have on-sale liquor licenses, to serve liquor between the hours of 10:00 o'clock A.M. and 1:00 o'clock A.M. Mondays in conjunction with the serving of food, provided that the licensee establishment is in conformance with the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act. SBC. 4.34. UNLAWFUL ACTS (LIQUOR). For the purpose of this Section, refer to Section 4.16 and 4.17. (Sections 4.35 through 4.39, inclusive, reserv<»u for future expansion.) ORONO CC 80 (4-1-84) 6789.1 TO: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator FROM: Dorothy Hallinr City Clerk DATE: June 1, 1989 SUBJECT: Changes in Minnesota Liquor Statute Attachments: A. Popham Haik Letter Dated 5/9/89 B. Excerpts from Current City Code ISSUE - Determine whether Council wants to amend the ordinance to incorporate changes in the Minnesota Liquor Statute outlined in Attachment A. DISCUSSION - In March of 1987 Council amended the ordinance relating to intoxicating and non-intoxicating liquor licensing and regulations to incorporate the issuance of an off-sale liquor license after the sale of the municipal off-sale liquor store. As noted in Attachemnt A changes in the Minnesota Liquor Statutes allows, among other things, for an off-sale store to be open on New Years Day and the 4th of July and extends the hours of Sunday sale of intoxicating liquor to 1:00 A.M., Monday. Chief Kilbo states he has no conflict with these changes. RECOMMENDATION - It is reccmmendec that Council changes and table this item to the June 26, 1989 meeting. If the Council desires to amend the current ordinance such change would have to be published in the official newspaper the week of July 3, 1989 in ordei to allow off-sale liquor on July 4th of this year. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, to table this item until the June 26, 1989 meeting. Ayes _, Nays —• TO: FROM: Mayor and City Council John R. Gerhardson, Acting City Administrator Forwarded recommending approval POPHAM. HAIK. SCHNOBRICH & KAUFMAISIJJX ATNC O. ATMONO A. MAIM OOCM W. »CH»lO«*lCH CNVCn KAUFMAN OaEHT A. MIN'SM otrc A. wonocN . MAHC WMITCMCAO MUCC O. WILLIS , WOaCMT JOHNSON AMY M. MACOMMCN OSCMT S. SUMH UOM V. MLUNASTT, III ■ COCMICN e. SNOWN 40MAS K. SCMO MUCC O. MALk CMSON LMCS H. STCILC n LMCS O. LOCNMAMT LLCN w. ninocmaakn LirroMO M. OMCKNC , william KAUrMAN AUL ■«. TICTZ icmacl o. rscKMAN OWAHO SAM MYCMS. Ill kMMV O. CSMKL ANIS S. MAYCMON «OMAS J. aAMNCTT JAMES A. PAYNE OAVIO A. JONES lee C. sheeny ALAIN rSECON LESLIE OILLETTE MICHAEL Y. NILAN THOMAS M. SIPAINS HOSENT C. mOILANEN THOMAS P. NELSON THOMAS J. MAOlO OAVIO L. HASHMALL KATHLEEN M. MAMTIN JOHN C. CHILOS OOUOLAS P. SEATON THOMAS E. SANNEM MICHANO A. KAPLAN SAUCE S. Mc PhEETEMS SCOTT S, MICH TEA PAUL. .lAlfMOTH SCOTT A. smith SMIAN N. JOHNSON OONALO H. fwis KENNETH AO«a> OAVIO A. STMANO elizaseth a . Thompson KEITH J. HALLELANO 3300 pipen jArrPAY tower MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA S5402 TELEPHONE 0I2-333-A8OO TELECOPIES • 331 6I2-33A-27I3 1321 6I2-334-278I 1311 8I2-334-2903 ^rrmmerrr / Ms. Dorothy Hallin City of Orono P, 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 MAMK __ ___________ timotU+Im kmck CAAOL/PfSiwANS SAUCqSi WE.TEM THOM^i/CilMlCLI ^feHAI CL SC mT SUITE 2400 1200 seventeenth STAEET DENVER. COLORADO 80202 telephone 303-SS3"200 TELECOPIES 303-693*2104 SUITE 300 south ISOO M STAEET. N.W. WASHINGTON. D.C. 20038 TELEPHONE 202-S20*9300 TELECOPIES Z02-S26-93I0 DIRECT DIAL NUMBER MiCHi J. MII^ACL SC^ TOOOfM. JOHNSON -----H-------imm LOUIS P. smith - SAUCE M. little ma MK r. PALMA •USSELL S. PONCSSA SAYAN L. CMAwrOAO MATTHEW C. OAMON JOHN W. PAOVO JILL I. PAICOEMS PAUL S. JONES ELLEN L. MAAS william O. HITTLES ELLEN SUE PAAKEA OAEOOMY O. SMOOHEM WILLIAM M. OJILE, JA. SAIan W. ohm OAEOOAY O. SCOTT AoSannE O. ZAiOENWESEA Shane a. kellET" - *•••*' K-fcn OUANL H. AOSC k EA elizaseth LEVINE OEE AOWE JOHN M. SAKES KAACN M. HANSEN** SUESAN PACE-SHAPIAO** LINOA S. PAIEONEP ANOMEW O. PAMHEA or cowMscL r AEO L. mossison OK' *OK<*TtO > tOMiTtfO 334-2549 May 9, 1989 RE: Changes in the Minnesota Dear Dorothy: or Statutes Enclosed please find a copy of Senate File No. 358 amending portions of the Minnesota liquor statutes. This bill was signed by Governor Perpich on April 24, 1989, but the effective date varies for the different provisions. Section 1 of the bill amends Minnesota Statute S 340A.402. It deletes the original language denying a retail liquor license to a person convicted of a violation of state, federal or local laws governing the manufacture, sale, distribution or possession for sale or distribution of liquor within five years of the license application. The amendment states that no new retail license can be issued to such an individual and gives the municipality the right to refuse to renew an existing license of a perron in the same instance. Please note that the term "intoxicating or nonintoxicating malt liquors" has been replaced with the term "alcoholic beverage." This amendment was effective April 24, 1989. Minnesota Statute S340A.504, Subds. 2 and 3 has been amended to extend Sunday sale of intoxicating liquor by one hour, until 1 a.m. Monday. Subd. 4 of the same statute has been amended to allow the sale of intoxicating liquor by an off-sale licensee on January 1 and July 4. Both the amendments are effective as of April 24, 1989. The final amendment pertinent to the City is the addition to Minnesota Statute S 340A.510. Malt liquor may also be included when an off-sale licensee offers samples within the liquor store, The quantity of the malt liquor is limited to less than 100 millileters per variety per customer. This provision is effective August 1, 1989. Should you have any questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, Nancy E.^Husnik Legal Assistant :plv/847 Enc. c: Mark Bernhardson (w/enc.) Chief Melvin Kilbo (w/enc.) Thomas Barrett, Esq. CHAPTER No. 49 S.F. No. 358 AN ACT Distributed By Secretary of the SENATE Room 231, State Capitol SLPaul, 296-2343 c 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 relating to liquor; clarifying license eligibility; changing-the time .of sale on certain holidays; ^allowing for,the dispensing of samples of ualtliquor;.- .;^repealing bond; requirement for retail licensees; .authorising the I town"board of Canosia township to - issue an offj-sale license; amending Minnesota Statutes 1 - 1983, sections-340A.402;:340A.405,.subdivision 1; ^ 340A.504, subdivisions’ 2, 3, and 4;“and’340A.510; — - repealing Minnesota Statutes 1988, section 340A.412, — —■. subdiyi3ion -1: . -c.~. vC*- . \7 ' ••• “ .IT • enacted: aYjTHE*. LEGI^TURE' OF' THE STATE’^Of^MINNESOTA: —' -r’* ' No retail* license may-be^ issued} to o'’;' ■s V -./r • j ^ (1) a person not* a citizen of the Onited States or a ; V''*‘resident alien; '• (2) a person under 21 years of .age;*'^^ • - ^ ^ (3) e-‘person-who-withrn*-£ire-years-of-the-lseense appiieation-has-been-convicted-o6-a-wiii£tti-Tioiation-of-a federai-or-state-iaw-or-iocai-ordinanee-gorerning-the manefaetareT-saier-drstribationT-or-posseaston-for-saie-or diatribetionr-o£-rntoxicatrng-or-nonintoxicating-neit-irquorsT f4t a person who has had an intoxicating liquor or nonintoxicating liquor license revoked within five years of the license application, or to any person who at the time of the violation owns any interest, whether as a holder of more than m m-Jy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Q.c. na. 490 five percent of the* capital stocK of a corporation lleonsoo* a partner or otherwise, in the premises or in the buaiotss conducted thereon, or to a corporation, partnership, association, enterprise, business, or firm in which any toch person is in any manner interested; or (4) a person not of good moral character and repute. In addition, no new retail license may be issued to, and the Qoverninc body of a municipality may refuse to renew the license of, a person who, within five years of the license aoDlication, has been convicted of a willful violation of a federal or state law or local ordinance governing the manufacture, sale, distribution, or possession for sale or distribution of an alcoholic beverage. Sec. 2. MJ lesota Statutes 1988, section 340A.405, subdivision 1, is amended to read: Subdivision 1. [CITIES.) A city may issue with' the approval of the_commissioner, an_o£f-sale intoxicating liquor license to an exclusive liquor store or to a drugstore. Ssties o£-fche-£i:rst7C£as3-may-aiso-i3Stte-an-o££-aaie-ii:een3e-to-a generai‘-£ood-3toreT' .~A city of'the~~first class may issue an off-sale license~to a~qeneral'‘£ood store to which an off-sale license had been issued on~the effective date of this section. » —* . “ . • ••Sec. 3..'Minnesota Statutes 1988,'section 340A.S04, subdivision 2, is amended to read: - * Subd. 2. (INTOXICATING LIQUOR; ON-SALE.1 No sale of intoxicating liquor for consumption on the licensed premises nay be made: • - „ . - • (1) between 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. on the days of Tuesday I Monday through Saturday; (2) between-i2r99-aidnight-and-0T99-aT.‘aT-on-Honday3r f3t after 1:00' a.m. on Sundays, except as provided by subdivision 3; f4t between 8:00 p.m. on December 24 and 8:00 a.m. on December 25, except as provided by subdivision 3. Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 1988, section 340A.504, subdivision 3, is amended to read: CHAPTER No. 49 S.F. No. 353 1 Subd. 3. (INTOXICATING LIQUOR; SUNDAY SALES; ON-SALE.1 (a) 2 A restaurant, club, bowling center, or hotel with a seating 3 capacity for at least 30 persons and which holds an on-sale 4 intoxicating liquor license may sell intoxicating liquor for 5 consumption on the premises in conjunction with the sale of food 6 between the hours of 12:00 noon on Sundays and ia-rSO-midnight-on 7 Sundays 1:00 a.m. on Mondays. 8 (b) The governing body of a municipality may after one 9 public hearing by ordinance permit a restaurant, hotel, bowling 10 center, or club to sell intoxicating liquor for consumption on 11 the premises in conjunction with the sale of food between the 12 hours of 10:00 a.m. on Sundays and iSrOO-midnight-on-Sundays 13 1:00 a.m. on Mondays, provided that the licensee is in 14 conformance with the Minnesota clean air act. 15 (c) An establishment serving intoxicating liquor on Sundays 16 must obtain a Sunday license. The license must be issued by the 17 governing body of the municipality for a period of one year, and 18 the.fee for the license may .not exceed $200. 19 A municipality.may'issue a Sunday intoxicating liquor 20 licenseronly 'if "authorized to' do so by the voters of the. ....... -.JL_;. * • 21 municipality:voting on- the* question at a‘ general or special 22 election.*^ « ’Z'- • - -‘ ‘ 23 (e) An election conducted in‘a"town on.the question of the 24 issuance by the county off Sunday sales licenses to 25 establishments located in the town oust be held on the day of 26 the annual election of town officers. 27 (f) Voter approval is notJVequired for licenses issued by 28 the metropolitan- airports commission or common carrier licenses 29 issued by the commissioner. Common carriers serving' 30 intoxicating liquor on Sunday oust obtain a Sunday license from 31 the commissioner at an annual fee of $50, plus $5 for each 32 duplicate. 33 Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 1988, section 340A.504, 34 subdivision 4, is amended to read: 35 Subd. 4. (INTOXICATING LIQUOR; OFF-SALS.1 No sale of 36 intoxicating liquor may be made by an off-sale licensee: X 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 lx 12 13 14 15 16 17 Id 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 CHAPTER No. 49 S.F. No. 358 (1) on Sundays; ■*- (2) before 8:00 a.a* on Monday through Saturday; (3) after 10:00 p.a. on Monday through Saturday at an establishment located in a city other than a city of the first class or within a cit> located within 15 miles of a city of the first class in the same county; (4) after 8:00 p.m. on Monday through Thursday and after 10:00 p.a. on Friday and Saturday at an establishment located in a city of the first class or within a city located within 15 miles of a city of the first class in the same countyr provided that an establishment may sell intoxicating liquor until 10:00 p.a. on December 31 and July 3, and on the day preceding Thanksgiving day, unless otherwise prohibited under clause (1); (5) on-Hew-years-BayT-January-iT f 6t-ors-5.idependenee-BayT“v«iy”4r o '» Thanksgiving Day; , ' • • • f8t (6) on Christmas Day,'December 25; cr (7) after 3:&0 p.a.;;-on ’Christmas 2v -icember 24. — Sec. 6. _Minne30ta;Sta'tutes' 1988section 340A.S10,.is ^ ^ •' r* •• . 1 • • * ^ ‘ . • •• amended: to •read;'2^'r “?Ic!!rf!S^ -T-, »-340A‘'.510 'tWINE SAMPLES: J= • '_ m Offrsale licenses'and-municipal liquor stores may provide .1 X-;.r ir, ' •*’ " ' samples of malt liouor,'wine,'• liqueurs, and cordials which the licensee or municipal.liquor store currently has in stock and is • ••••* t . offering for sale to the general public without obtaining an * s * additional license, provided the wine, liqueur, and cordial samples are dispensed at no^ejiarge’and consumed on the licensed premises during the permitted hours of off-sale in a quantity less than 100 milliliters of malt liquor per variety per customer, 50 milliliters of wine per variety per customer and 25 milliliters of liqueur or cordial per variety per customer. Sec. 7. (OFF-SALE LICENSE; CANOSlA TOWNSHIP.) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the town board of Canosia township in St. Louis county may issuean off-sale intoxicating liquor license to an exclusive liquor store with the aporoval of the commissioner of public safety. A license. CHAPTER No. 49 S.F. No. 358 1 under this section is ooverned bv all provisions off Minnesota 2 Statutes, chapter 340A> except as otherwiee provided in this .3 section. 4 Sec. 8. (R£?£ALER.] 5 Minnesota Statutes 1988, section 340A.412, subdivision 1. 6 is repealed. 7 Sec. 9. (EFFECTIVE DATE.) 8 Section 5 is effective the day Collowinq ginaX enactment. 9 Section 7 is effective on approval by the Canosia town board and 10 compliance with Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021. “ '-t ■ r“ • — • • * -u "4 -f s—r *ril V-*-. •X' * ■ • •''Tin ■' ■' 1’;._ _ _::: ; ; I ; CHAPTER No.'49 S.F. No. 358 This enactment of the Senate and House of Representatives is properly enrolled.’ Jeroiye M. Hughes' fruukiu of lA« Stnatt. ■■ f?Jdr Robert Vanasek Spoakor of iKi Hotut of Rtpnuniatuiot. Passed the Senate on April 17, 1989. Patrick C. flahaven Sttioiary of Iko Stnau. PassedtheHouseofRepreaenutlveson April 13, 1989. J \ r' Suven C. Cross . '.*** Rtoitor of Statuut. Approved o rUed on u 1989. ^Rudolph G. Coottnor of tKi Siau oft / ^ Joan Anderson Crowe Sttniary of 5tai/. i > y V ORDINANCE NOMBER 9 SECOND SERIES .H ordinance SIn I TO iV to^Sn ^^ND il'H-INTOXICATING LIQDOR LICENSING and regulation The City council of t..e City of Otono ordains: ?n%":*ica\'in“Vnd Non-In‘toxicationg Liquor Licensing and Regulation* is amended to read: c.hH a persons Disqualified. In addition to any other pr/vts^-on of. law nounder this Chapter who h„ teen convict^ the license tion non-intoxicating malt manufacture, sale or license therefor has been liquor, liquor '1*'°/,!,.“rclnv i"Ud of gamblingrevoked within such period^^of^Um^e^or^^^^^^^^^ person quau/y who has not attained the State established legal drinking age. This ordinance becomes effective upon adoption and publication on January 18, 1988. passed by the Council this 11th day of January, 1988. published in the Laker and Pioneer newspaper on the 18th day of January, 1988. SEC. 4.32. HOURS AND DAYS OF LIQUOR SALES. Subd. 1. On-sale. No on-sale of liquor shall be made between 1:00 o'clock A.M. on Sunday, nor until 8:00 o'clock A.M. on Monday, nor after 8:00 o'clock P.M. on December 24. No on- sale of liquor shall be made between the hours of 1:00 o'clock A.M. and 8:00 o'clock A.M. on any weekday or Saturday. Subd. 2. Off-sale. No off-sale of liquor shall be made before 8:00 o'clock A.M. or after 8:00 o'clock P.M. of any day, except Friday and Saturday on which days may be made until 10:00 o'clock P.M. No off-sale shall be made on New Year's Day, January 1; Independence Day, July 4; Thanksgiving Day; or Christmas Day, December 25; but on the evenings preceding such days, if the sale of liquor is not otherwise prohibited on such evenings, off-sales may be made until 10:00 o'clock P.M. SEC. 4.33. SUNDAY SALES. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, a Sunday on-sale license may be issued to hotels, motels and restaurants, as herein defined, which have on-sale liquor licenses, to serve liquor between the hours of 10:00 o'clock A.M. and 12:00 o'clock midnight on Sundays in conjunction with the serving of food, provided that the licensee establishment is in conformance with the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act. SEC. 4.34. UNLAWFUL ACTS (LIQUOR). For the purpose of this Section, refer to Section 4.16 and 4.17. (Sections 4.35 through 4.39, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.} ORONO CC Subd. 17. NO sale o£ liquor shall be made to or in guest rooms of hotels, unless the rules of such hotexs provide for service of food in guest rooms, and unless the sale accompanies and is incident to the regular service of meals to guests therein. OFF-SALE LIQUOR AHD WINE Subd. 18. An off-sale licensee may provide samples of wine, liqueurs, and cordials which the licensee currently has in stock and is offered to the general public without obtaining an additional license providing that the wine, liqueur, and cordial samples are dispensed at no charge and consumed on a licensed premise during the permitted hours of off-sale in a quantity less than 50 milliliters of wine per variety per customer, and 25 milliliters of liqueur or cordial per variety per customer. Subd. 19. No off-sale licensee, his agent or employee shall deliver any intoxicating liquor to or at any place or premises without obtaining a receipt therefor, signed by the person receiving such liquor and bearing the time, date and place of delivery. Such receipts shall be kept in the files of the licensee for a period of one year and such files and receipts shall be available for inspection by the license examiner or designated employee at all hours during which the licensed premises is open for business. Subd. 20. No off-sale establishment may be located within 500 feet of an institution of public education whose primary purpose is education of individuals in grades kindergarten through 12th grade. Subd. 21. No off-sale establishment may be located closer than 1/2 mile from the off-sale premise licensed in the City of Orono with a maximum of two off-sale licenses issued in the City. t • TOl FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardsonr City Administrator' June 21, 1989 cnmaiiiKEnK JUN 2t 1989 CITYOFORONO SUBJECT: Administrator's Information RECYCLING PROGRAM - During the month of May 45-50% of persons in the community participated in the recycling. The vendor convinues to be able to take materials and indicated any need to increase in price nor are they having difficulty getting rid of materials collected. It is anticipated, however, that this may become an issue later this fall and may be a prelude to any renegotiation. rnnNTY road 116 - It is our understanding that the County is pgoceedgvMr 116 with no indication from the City of Medi"« that they do not want it. As such the County has completed their preliminary design plans and would like each of the cities to review the plans within their respective communities. anticipated following a meeting of Public Works City Engineer with the County on Tuesday, June 27th that an informational meeting for abutting property owners will be established sometime in July or August. WATERFOWL RELOCATION - At the Council's April 24, 1989, ^meeting Council agreed to"allow the relocation of geese from the Pheasant Lawn area (West LafayettS Road) by Dr. associated with the University. It is our understanding that this relocation will take place within the next few weeks. SHORELAND REGULATIONS - It is our understanding that these regulations will be transmitted to the City within the next at which point the City will have an opportunity to comment. Once staff has had an opportunity to staff will transmit comments and concerns together with a copy of the document to the Council. HIGHWOOD STORM SEWER - Difficulties in getting together a-1 the property owners iiil^lved to discuss the issue has been difficult. It is hoped that these discussions with the property owners will be concluded the week of June 26th. COUNTY ROAD 51 PARKING - Staff has been awaiting sufficient ^mpletion of the Metro Waste Control Commission project to determine an adequate sight line for removal of the parking. It is hoped this will be completed in two weeks. lAKE MINMETOMKA REGIOMAL PA.... - As you may ^“ve noticed, Park and Open Space Committee has approved the initiation of Eminent Domain Proceedings. This is expected to get unanimous approval by the full Metro Council. In a separate note, the City or Minnetrista has also appealed the results of the lawsuit. This is apparently being taken directly to the Supreme Court and is expected to te heard later this year. It is expected that a date bve, the next month at which time it would be i»i^^6^pr4a^• ‘ ^ ee if the City desires to participate with an amicus curiae brief. MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL - Please note the attached documents indicating receipt by Orono for the Minnesota Safety Council's Meritorious Achievement Award in traffic safety for 1988. LMCD REPORT - Given the fact that Gene Strummen was present at the June 12th Council Meeting and Jo Zl Hurr will be out of town on the 26th, there will be no one present at Monday's Meeting. During the next two months, Jo Ellen will be involved with a State Commissioner tour on the 2nd and 4th Mondays. We will work to have any issues handled either in written form or through Gene Strommen or myself. One of the issues of concern recently has been the St. - ^ ban's Bay Marina. While an LMCD committee had recommended appr . it was defeated at the Board level. According to Jo Elle' there will not be a reconsideration but will stand as a denial with findings of fact to support the denial presently being drafted. cc: Jo Ellen Hurr U ' IS-.fIf s -s ;-51':;^ ■ *' ’’•* r--. ’•'ii . .. i J • V •. ••• , j *I :vr V.';i:i f r‘- ■< ■4- :• '.v i •• • --x " -vj.V *-j-. : •f. ; V.:i •-.i'••••. i .1. .ia ■ ■' 7!., iDMaooAxajvsmsmm \93au9pKO ^»J«S noBimiH 6861 9((l n tn tpiA noX 9Atq 01 pnojd u .sav *8861 u< tlusu»A9!t|3« X»jn I ufptaisitio JOj fpjiAy Xtajij t.JOunAOO 9<p Jo inuiqm ain|tt 9/f^ 6861 ‘3unf - sjauuiyVi pjeMy iCiajeS s.joajaAOQ 1 «>S VI nfi iHjiil! iiifiiii 1.1 it iiiiiiiiii I III iiiiiijiiiiiiiiii j ‘ ..' ••• ■ J' • ti*' \ (Ilf I II fl liui iiii piaiH ai»i ^ ’-i it| !?ii| i ' V. ■ ‘ •ji'" mm f ■'iMaS-fSi Sill®• ®V V '#«imm\ i' li;I*Si;- . -v; Hi ■iVn., r.-^ V r- •fe|- p; ta ftS;; §m nil! i 1 ?” Ill m\ ]=* If if illhi n } til ill liu li SyJ]j|j| 11)22 1! llsl: !| Jlffll Hi 11 111 I ||]i|i1| ml In l!W «ll liniiol HI III I 111, 1hmm ijii 1 iii ill] I III fill IJII IlllJi Hi . llllllilll I S ^ S m i PI M1 III fjj iJifi iiiiii ! i III i ffilll il I ,<lt H -Iii 2 I i B3 'S ■g . i c iillillfii 1 111 I if!l 111I I II ll I ll I i! A •• ? ■ !/■ '.' *•' ■ •• f--. : ?.', ■ i •. • • •. •■•.. •: ; ••>•• •■ ./. ' •i •* i: ■ • • [ ^y'0: : .; -ij-- ■ i •; ; ! : . v'r 1MWpvmh I V ^>' ' I :• -; i4 ‘' 7--k^l4V! i-V; r;_i.. V • ■•• .■'■ V -. • V ;■ •'"5 i'.i • :V;; -iH;- : - ‘■Vi' ■i '-i.' if|i MNNESaiA SAFETYCOUNCIL The Safety l^ssoutw April 25, 1989 M. Kilbo, Chief of PDlice City of Orono P 0 Box 86 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Kilbo; Congratulations I Your community has been selected to receive the Meritorious Achievonent Award in Traffic Safety. The awards cairoittee commends you on your high level of achievement. Presentation of your award will be immediately proceeding the Governor's Safety Awards Banquet at the 1989 Minnesota Safety Conference, beginning at 7:00 p.m. on June 6 at the Radisson South Hotel in Bloomington. The form to advise us of the person who will accept your award and to make banquet reservations is enclosed. Your award recipient need only pay for meal function tickets; the recipient's conference registration will be complimentary. We've also enclosed a copy of our conference program and send a warm invi tation to other members of your organization to attend the excellent safe ty and health prcgrams 4iich will be presented. We encourage you to visit the largest display of ^fety and health products and services in Minneso ta. Your early return of the enclosed reservation form will help us make ef fective arrangements for an impressive ceremony. We'll look forward to hearing from you by May 17. Sincerely, MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL, INC. Carol A. Bufton president CAE/ntl enclosures 474 Concordia Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55103 (612) 291-9150 Chartered by the National Safety Council—Organized June 1,1928 Minnesota Safety Council Officers Chairman of the Board Chairman Elect. President Vice Presidents Secretary Treasurer Chairman. Board of Trustees Nicholas R. Eian. Vice President. Administration. Star Tribune. Minneapolis Marlene E. Marschall. President. St Paul Ramsey Medical Center. St Paul Carol A. Bufton. Chief Executive Officer. Minnesota Safety Council. Inc . St Paul Davis W. Heiberg. Executive Director. Seaway Port Authority of Duluth. Duluth Donna D. Holstine. Member. Fairmont City Council. Fairmont Richard C. I ueck. Operations Manager IBM Corporation. Rochester Randolph A. Morris. Vice President. Production. Honeywell. Inc . Golden Valley James A. Rice, Sr Vice President Health One Corporation. Minneapolis Laurel I. Bessesen. Honorary Past President. Minnesota Federation of Women's Clubs. Minneapolis John S. Hay. Vice President Administration. Regional Controller. The Prudential Insurance Company. Minneapolis Robert J. Odom. Sr Vice President. H B Fuller Company. St Paul Minnesota Safety Council Directors Robert L. Anderson. Past President. Minnesota Safety Council. Inc . St Paul J. L. Benshoof, Vice President, Network Services. US West Communications. Minneapolis Michael J. Billings. Vice President Risk Management Services. St .^aul Companies St Paul Winston W. Borden. President. Minnesota Chamber of Commerce & Industry. St Pau-' James R. Brennan. President & CEO. NWNL General Insurance Company. Minneapolis Eugene L. Cannon. President. Cole Transportation, Inc . South St Paul James L. Craig, M D . Vice President. Health and Human Services. General Mills. Inc . Minneapolis Timothy J. Crimmins. M D . President, Minnesota Seat Belt Coalition. Minneapolis C. E. Doggett, General Manager. Burlington Northern Railroad. Minneapolis H. Duane Edberg. President. AAA Minnesota. Minneapolis Edwin F. Erickson, Vice President. Potlatch Corporation. Northwest Paper Division Cloquet Clinton O. Ferner. General Manager. Duluth. Missabe & Iron Range Railway. Duluth Thomas E. Hawkinson. ’i S , CIH. President Upper Midwest Section. American Industrial Hygiene Association. Minneapolis John F. Heule. Vice President Corporate Security. Safety and Environmental Services Control Data Corporation. Minneapolis Gerald T. Howard. President. DCI. Inc . St Cloud James J. Howard, President & CEO, Northern States Power Company. Minneapolis Ritter J. Humphrey. Vice President. Customer Relations. Minnesota Power. Duluth LeRoy J. Johnson. Vice President. Consumer Products. Northrup King Company. Golden Valley Honorable Henry J. Kalis. Minnesota House of Representatives. St Paul Ronald V. Kelly. Corporate Vice President, industrial Group. Pentair, Inc . Roseville Alien I. Koenig, President. Midwest Specialuted Transportation. Rochester Leonard W. Levine, Commissioner, MN Department of Transportation. St Paul Carlos W. Luis. Vice President. Public Alfa- Hubbard Broadcasting. Inc . St Paul John MacFarlane. President. Otter Tail Power Company. Fergus Falls Ralph J. Marlatt. President. Insurance Federation of Minnesota. St Paul Honorable Gene Merriam. Minnesota State Senate. St Paul Peter Mucha. Jr.. M D , Mayo Clinic. Department of Surgery, Rochester Charles W. Nelson. Vice President. Risk Management. Soo Line Railroad Company. Minneapolis William M. Nettei. Manager of Operations. Eveleth Mines. Eveleth Charles D. Nyberg. Sr Vice President & General Counsel Geo A Hormel & Company. Austin Andrew C. Olson. Vice President. Operations .Minnesota). Minnegasco. Inc . Minneapolis Robert J. Peaison. Vice President. Human Resources, American Crystal Sugar. Moorhead James B. Perske, President. Upper Midwest Chapter. Veterans of Safety. Bloomington Kenneth B. Peterson, Commissioner, MN Department of Labor & Industry. St Paul Honorable James D. Rogers, Judge, District Court. Fourth Judicial District. Minneapolis Robert M. Sable. Safety Chairman. IBEW Local 160. Director. National Safety Council. Minneapolis Philip Scearcy. President. American Society of Safety Engineers. Shoreview Robert Strasburg, Executive Vice President. General Manager. Hennepin Paper Company. Little Falls Ronald A. Weber. Division Vice President. 3M • Traffic Control Materials. St Paul Richard P. Wolsfeld. Principal. BRW. Inc . Minneapolis John A. Woodhall. Chairman & CEO. Central Allied Enterprises, Inc . Director. National Safety Council. Willmar COUHCtt MEE7nH6 JUN26I989 C*TyOFOROHO LIST OP LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR MEETING OP June 26, 1989 Set-Up Permit Renewal - Navarre Lanes 3435 Shoreline Drive Fire Works Permit - Roger Frommelt 2805 Casco Point Road Ron Potas 2190 Shadywood Road INTEROFFICE MEMO DATE: JUNE 23, 1989 TO: ORONO CITY COUNCIL FROM: CHIEF KILBO RE: LIQUOR LICENSE - NAVARPF LANES I HAVE REVIEWED FILES FOR THE PAST YEAR AND HAVE FOUND NO VIOLATIONS OR OTHER PROBLEMS INVOLVING NAVARRE LANES, AND THEREFORE RECOMMEND ISSUANCE OF THE LIQUOR LICENSE. •• I,I. • V ! f 'V r<- V ■‘^■ . ti'.' ■■■■' ■ v•.*^ ti^ ••■‘•i • .• •-:• -t. . • •. ■: r. ; ; . . *• ' ■ ?»; ■. •.’. ■ • V.■,r,;; v. . >;» * .'.Iv- ;. ■ PHONE 612-296 6IS9 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFE! LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION 333 SIBLEY • ST. PAUL. MN 55101 APPLICATION FOR CONSUMPTION AND DISPLAY (SET UP| PERMIT ^ IS'C .c oPERMIT FEE ^4^4-50 IF NAME AND ADDRESS SHOMN ARE NOT CORRECT. MAKE CHANCES IN SPACES BELOW NOTE: ALL ON-SAL-* INTOXICATING LIOUOR LICENSEE’S ARE EXEMPT FROM APPLYING. Ap0HC«nu Nim* pjnw>*winA r f)o A/ S'/- _______ Butinoi SliMI AM<«U o« Hui Numom_____A ri«d« Of oaA LAjh£S 'a X S < pC hmit tvpc (Z]p>tir«l« Clue ^Ipue County /-//- Ay 4/ M z' a/ Typool 6u»in*ti (iiMUuxni, 0*nc* m«m, tie.) ___ Soto Lt /V Butmoti pnon* 210 Coo* £y'37-L. Nemo oi Suitneu o> C uo Meneye. N«m# of Vwilptof Qmf^t Ki(< CLUB C SEa/Ti7 U ARE Tk E CLuVon BOSiPfESS RRCMISLS SEPARATE TROM < OTHCH B*JSINiSS cstabusmmcntf IS apblicatiom original O RCNENAl^t^.-transfer I Aaoieti oi Meneew A/fy Add««u of Dwpdf NON*iNf6i«tCATlNG MAcV At ^yy^y mAS oh >Vill A NON-iNrOKICATINC malt liquor license BCCN issued TO THIS BUSINESS FOR THIS LOCATIONS rW f-T0v»« LJno IF transfer , former licensees name anu Business thaoc name FOR A PUBLIC BUSINESS: II » PofineMhip. Sieit me Nome en<i ArttiiMt pi Eetn PiMnei II e Coiooieiion. Sitt* the Nome end Addin* ol Eeci< 0Hice« Dutineti Pennef.Oiiicei a/ Sc/fE/(y£ /L BuMn«»l Ptstntf/0MK«» ^PS 4S£rJiPEEj/ /%io lla/£> FOR A PRIVATE CLUB ueie Clue O'teniiM Numoei Rl Memeei*Amount ol Duet Merneeiimp Reouiiemeni* Clue OiiKei/Oiietlof Nemo LtnfIFi of Tim« CIwO Al Betioni LO««llOfli U Ciwtt Biiiidif^ 0«en«d O* Atoitdf Clue Ciliicat/bldciot Nam#AdOiaii CluO Oiru««/OlFdcl0P N«m«. .aiffcti Ooei Clue Meiniein Locueit *■ T» Memee<* To Sioie Liaueei Ove» On Has applicant: if partnership, any partner; if corporation, any officer or director; if club, any club officer or director, ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked or suspended or been convicted for any violation of State Laws or local ordinances; if so. give date and details O_____________________________ I eettby ceriily mat iRa aniNOi* ait l>ua ol my own EnoMtadea and undaiHand iRai lira tiving ol lalia inloimaiion o> the lailuia to t»* oarnnani inleTmelioa conililuittceuM lo> (allocation ol livioa<mii ANV PERMIT ISSUEO HEREUNDER DOES NOT Al ^ NO CONSIDERATION WILL BE GIVEN TO THIS APPLICATION UNLESS APPROVED AS PROVIDED BELOW IF THE BUSINESS IS LOCATED IN A COUNTY; AeeMtvao - cnauea«»an county bowo o# Rao(*»aniaii»a Data IF THE BUSINESS IS LOCATED IN A MUNICIPALITY AoptODOd - CowncR Pittidani at Raii(a«antaii«a Data P« VOQ? 13/BSI the sale of INTOXICATING LIQUOR. 4^ : CLUB ATTACH A COPY OF THE CONSTITUTION AND BYLAWS OF THE CLUB AND A CURRENT LIST OF MEMBERS. CASH CHECK MM fmmi; ills ; 1 Mm mmMM'W&WWB I' H: i mmm -rrr.-a*-.fi* ..• V;- Oi CD I tH <S AI o fH rH l.l I 3 yj II I I §I IM 5s « o Q» 2 {>. IIu Q g 8 H Ui I & I «»I R >I Ui i I «r 3 I tbi I I ,5 rtI .51rt X s2 u3 9 § 3 3 “I <«2 i| P^ a ct Oi &a o X Vi C' Uiu 2 ]g < Ii!! 3o X ^ oH •H ft. 2 I J 1 (4 5 P Uc H W5 H •c il*os8 1" •oOi »0o ii (0 £ (A IU) o <T> d 2 ii I 3 Ji iI X U '■ 3 (1 u•t ••I?if §5.if- •1.'4' 'W-■•-'41- ■$ ■ M ■ V ’ ■ - ' •*.* -■M- ; >i- y-M ■St-r.^. ■!)vV '■ft ■4-m ■ifI '■il * V> • \ • •..• . ^ . • ■» i , * 06/11/89 PR: CB PRREGOR YTD . T '■MA : ,'S ■’ • • -•■ •;V“-. o,®:y w- m-”: i-'-r: M:- r^tsnf CURNAME OPT GROSS 0R9l§ ANDERSON. BRUCE L 31 18395.21 1645.52BERNHARDSON, MARK E 12 23984.88 250.00BERNHARDSON. MARK E 12 26028.97 2044.09BOBZIEN, SUE A 31 10655.26 886.40 BOSMA, JAMIE L 12 5963.51 393.33BOYLAN, STEVEN D 93 204.26 33.25BRAUN. ROBERT R 93 515.25 225.00BRINKHAUS. JOHN F 42 16828.20 1357.08CHESWICK. GARY B 31 17589.20 1468.00 CHRISTIANSON, SALLY 31 1995.00 186.93CORNICK, JAMES L 31 18423.27 1347.92I DENNISON. TROY A 35 30.60 30.60ENGLISHIII. IRVING H 31 18002.73 1676.89ERICKSON. KURT R 31 16909.96 1364.16 FISCHENICH. DAN T 31 16539.95 1315.44FRITZLER. JOHN M 31 17512.12 1517.63 GAFFRON, MICHAEL P 33 15051.89 1256.08QERHARDSON, JOHN R 42 20291.64 1693.37GREGORY. JAMES D 42 14655.31 1225.20 HALLIN. DOROTHY M 12 13286.82 1108.80 HANSEN. STEVEN C 42 11466.08 1098.40 ' HANSING. CAROL J 31 6024.50 590.50 JACOBS. THOMAS J 33 15051.81 1256.09JOHNSON. BRADLEY P 31 17716.89 1671.10' KZLBO. MELVIN H 31 21828.40 1621.60 KNUTSON, CHARLOTTE A IS 10622.47 886.40 KUEHN. THOMAS M 15 20422.09 1704.23KUYPER. SCOTT E 31 4056.61 528.31 LINDSTROM. DAVID J 93 92.25 27.00MABUSTH. JEANNE A 33 18034.04 1504.95 . MILLS JR. WALTER H 93 919.13 280.25. MORAN, MARK F 31 17615.24 1337.28MOROWCZYNSKI, JAMES 31 19980.54 1735.04I NAAB, THERESA L 12 10619.24 886.40: OAS, DANIEL 0 93 787.50 247.50OBRIEN, RANDY L 92 11829.48 991.01OMAN. LYLE E 33 12622.45 1053.37I OUAST, WAYNE A 92 13979.65 1272.42I RATHBUN, BARRY J 92 12198.94 987.53I SASS, JOHN J 42 13266.04 1098.40 SCHAUSS, CHARLES R 31 14042.54 1169.94 I SCHEFFLER, LAURIE K 12 9028.10 753.44 I SKREEN. DALE S 42 12931.24 1098.40 STEFFENHAGEN, RONALD 93 13305.08 1110.32 I STEVENS. BETTY Q S3 1089.39 207.38 . THOMTON, MARK R 31 15655.02 1315.44 i TOMCHECK, LAWRENCE F 31 16708.22 148;'. 72 «mr|0FlMi) .V 4 '; ,:,ifcc*‘V .iC\ I ^ ;.4 '^r-nf. ’ (■■ymimA!.■■ ‘ ; • csr * r ? ‘ -■ > ^i':v:-^< 'y. * ‘•'i ■ •.. • ty:vmziv:kV: • -AmAy ^r' ■^=- - te.vv - ^ rmnyy; iv.-1 :•■#>>■■ v'C': vp y -' y •■vj • •*, X 'i > I-'•V* T' .*/ 'f ,f.i •i V. ■ ^ >. ^ -'Ma- -'r:::) m<y - yi ■ r.A'^k ■ ■ ' ''WV.- .V''if :M G ; i ' U .»• ] ■f’■ •f • . ■ i . ' V \ / ■ •- • * * •• •, I ' ‘U ■•' a:.: 08/H/89 PR. CB PRREQOR NAME OPT YTD GROSS CURRENT GROSS TOMCZYK, MARK W WALSH, KEVIN L WALTEJis, LINDA Q 31 16519.52 35 3325.26 15 4022.33 1364.16 358.23 804.49 c ‘ iv ■' / • ~ X ' 51.654.97 sKV;-' is 3 *1^.. . .. 5r ’yUj 'J.: .•. ".vC: ‘ ‘ i f‘ .,'■ -i' '•', '. •Vv:*;v>*k-'' 'V5::ry%^< ' '.?'•■'.■•• • • ••' Wl':'': '■ 'i: -'MM <‘yyiW- ' ■ I' ' . T . V ; G. ’ w ’v:H m ;,' '■■ ■• ,.r V- • mm-:- ■■'•is; '■ ••■"■ -tJ' ;f A -•■ ■vt;. lUa ui (9 0 s 40 CM <D O </) U I c/> o </) o {/) !i£o (/I o O'* s I«uu M CMIOMCOCMM M '-n MM CM •H CM i mmmc 'M MM(«>(n<«tf>a»a4cn <D M(0 CO 9 11 • 1 1 A 1 1 t 1 t 1 > 1 t 1 1 4 1 4 1 1 oic»aiai<va»01 o»a>o>«o>oa>o)o 0 040 04 o»Ok 1<o)iniDCMM«01 Cn<0 (MM ^ ^ (O 04 o>04 04 •*rsi 9OOOMMCM0ooMMCMCMinimnCMOCMCM•H CM 1 1 1 • 1 •1 • • 4 1 • 4 1 i 1 1 1 4 4 1 1 ft000000cn0404040404(^019404 n n CM CO CMMMMMMMr..r..r^r..r^r^r..r~r^CO re CM fO 0 * CM CM CM CM CM CM n Co CO CO CO CO n CO r**) n CM ncn CM CO CM CO • ni » 1 • 1 1 1 •1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 4 4 4 1 ft MMMMMM M MMMMMMCMC*)^m4 M.4 M 000000 0 00000 OMMM 0 00 0 0 0 • I Q.*-* •eu</> Uio i; Ui UJ Ui Ui Ui ui Ui a. 0.0. A. 0.0. O.O.O.O.C.O. 333333 </)(/»(/)!/> MM I4II1JIM IftI kiJ Ia Juuuuuu U.U.U.U.U.U. 3o s Ui ae OOOOOOQOOaeoeoeocococoroeo:000000000uuouuuuou oeaeoeoeocaeaeo:oe U.U.U.U.U.U.U.U.U. 000000000 »-►-1-»-1-i-zzzaEzzzzz ooooaoooo<««<«< (/)z 0 X (/I4-4 4-4 z(/)z z 4-4auCKzz04-4 XX _j 4C C/X0 Ui Ui »-ae <<Ui (J)z u.<aeoe 4 —0.•M 0.4-M (/>3 u. MMoUi■c zuUiXu uuuuuuzzzzzz <<<<<< 3 Ui> 000000 MMMMMM Ui Ui ui Ui UJ Uizzzzzzzzzzzz MMMMMMzzzzzzI : I I I I 000000oeaeoeaeaeaeUUUUUU<<<<<< 0 M OC u Ui ae< uuuuuuuuuzzzzzzzzz 000(9(90000«««<<< Ui Ui Ui UJ Ui Ui UI UJ ui _J—J-J—l-J_J_l_l_i <<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>> IklUiUiUiUiUJUlUiUi _J—»—(k.a.a.o.o.a.0.0.0.o.a.a.a.a.o.o.o.a.<<<<<<<<< M< E Maenz< ae<Ui c/>u*zzss << MM uu<< zoae i ui O O 3m uz s M oe<u >oe 3nr« Oz Moz Ui> ou 8u o»ot«o<»cnrsi M«n o M •«C •««a CO 00 0000000000 COCO 000 •OOP 00 00 mCM-4 oooooooooo ftOiO ooo in«j>04 04 00 n OinMOMcaineaiAO coco cm Ocm n (T4 (0 40 00 a>0COCOMCncoMceMcnwcnOcocoMOMCM CM min 0 M M mm cn i s 8 M u M« (O s zu UJzo Oi 01 0> 04 04 0> •aaowMOTaa NCMCMCMCMCM 4D«0<DC0a)«0000000 <D(o«D«Dea> 000000 000000 MMMMMM MMMMMM (DO o M o>a»atatcnoia>o»ot•ooooooODoaoooooao (0(0(0«0(p<0 (0(0(0ooooooooo MMMMMMMMM MIM CM (M (M CM (M (N CMooooooooo r*A c*' r*." fN. fN. f... (AOS axe (0 40 00 tnio CD <0 00 MM MM U>o « (M M « M • M ■ M VIo<a. 0 : uio<t/)(/) Uiz «D CM r>ooo< 15 Mou oc u Ui X o oe Ooz Ui> V) n:o o o z s< r>r> I I ioo> CM (VI —1 I t (M(M mm o 0 1 oo o <o CM (^ n I t o>o o>oi om I I n n nto am n cN <M(VJ (MCM OO OO mco zz ►H H UiUj V.IV << HI-1 zz OO ^ _l OOuu O'a. o. 3 O >- Q. Ou zz<< OO VMI-I OO i/iUt ZZ Koe OO u. u. ►HI •« ZZ OO m o fl ««■«« lO mom OO Ooom mom OO OO OO m«* CM amc»—4 -H o fsiorsi OO (oa<o u>ao men fn H cn C0C4C>ama CMCMm 0>0) z m o Ui •-M t-M 1-m acoe _i a.mm z UIUI o. IH zz o zz a. OC ►-< n Q.t-i-3 U 3 U.U.m mmmmoOOo Ui o mm <o Q ou 1—t-M OC oca:< Z UiUi Ui UiUi 1- Ui QC UI zz z »-•--•Z ►-Ui»-30 O <<i«i<m Ui ►M n*-)h-23 ooz •—(CD </> iC o OO OO (0(0 •H oa QC< Q. O Vt m o ^ ^ I I I o> n o> mm m OOO I I • o «-*orM CM (*»(*>^ ^ I I I ooo UJUJUJ UlUiUI U.U.U. ZZZ 00 1/1 (/) <<< UJUlUJ ZZZ OOmm (Ni(M moomoooo CO-IO^ ^omo> M <M (V c*> (/)m a m OC 4 z O Ui OC o zzz O o Ui m ooo z>mmm a Ui Ui •d jC z m OQ OOO M m>►Ml-H-I Ui Ui 4 ocacoc 4 ZaOUiUi Ui m»-•mm3UiUiUiXmoUi f-U.U.U.n OCmK_l _J _l oe a. 4 4 ooo Z X Ui Ui acocac Ui Ui (0(0 mm o CM o 0 1’r. r- f;- K- fc f (• $■ r, ;• Kt5: • s ozO OC UI O »- < o >- o K z fM O 5Co a UI •Q Z a O (0(0 OO c o CO >M>H C'C*- C'C'*-< CM aa aa o>a C7>0> O) Q*O)cn aoeo OO OO OO «OO OoO) 00 00 OO 'S.'N.V.V. •M —(•H -H -H —4 CM CM CM CM rsj (V rj CM CN V.\'v. (0(0 (0(0 <o (O 40UMO U3 CO OO OO o o o OOO O o OOmm mm c>c» a a a a a a CM O CM » 0 I i 1 i •; ;'-v* •t • •■’q ■•/. •I'i ; ' K :>!i' 1 waUi <a (/) < M a. uj 4/) u (/> u (/) o (/) u (/) y;o (/) Xo C s «D ON • a •Do m a »-« ■e u I/) Id O z le *>4 UI»- VI oUJ •e le uUJ X u ss SI X 3 I o § S le ^ s M U X o0» UJ M X« o ae<o s t/JWIV) W>V)zxxxz »-•>-< *-tn xxxxxooooo ooes DO (/» (/)(/>(/) C/IV) UJ UJIdUJ IdUJ ♦H *h»hih j-ii-i Ol IM a a 3in aaa aa aaaj-aa :333<33 l/l(/)t/>X(/IVI a Id a tn a 33333 X u io ld<UJIdUJV>UJUJ uxuuunuu aoiaaaciaa V) Id 0^00^X u <UI a s O XXXXX <<<<<Id IdUJ Id Id XXXXX W---- 2 Oa aaaaa 33333 oooo*- pcaeoctc* (900(9' z 3 o u Id uiuildiu Idld'*.) uueiuuuuG aaaaaaaa Id a Id X iu in(/)inuu/u/uAvt m •II « O -'.nrou^oo MM in (AMCOIMPOOMWW o mm IOr>NOM«D OO lO <o*4 (ncDOoimM 0)01*>) o) Min M MM tnamiooviomaaa>o>o><ooa»an (D<0 woo oiooo«£)»^ooin CM <o (M r>j tn w M <M ^ (*» oicnoxnawwwww m w a> w oiaioxBoxsicnai WWOOWWWOOW too lf'JCNJ<NfMfSJr>J (OWU>|0WU)<OIO oooouooo ID mintnmiA f>J(MrM(M(M f'" aia cn r*. r- in Xu z 1-4 m O) 1 MMMmm mrofonoi 1 i 1 1 • o» 1 ID fH 1 -12cM<M«i»in-if*)nfMMMMMconn^MM«<*» 'V - *• i s o o» in Mwaiwo OJfMnjMOi MMMMin • •ill M <n m 1 o «o 0 1 o> r) o 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 • O)o>o)a>ai«t«*oi noinioMMM^ OOOOMmmcm 1 • <nc» CM CM MM (■' i H- 3 fM«• n M M M M M mminmin M M M M M CM o V w in o • I I 1 I 1 I 1 oooooooo mmmmmmmm 1 I CM CM WWOU1• •III 1 m«• 1 M W CM CM CM (M CM CM CM CM WC9 \vt 2 • M MMMMW pOOOM w M M o M o • 1 I I I 1 1 I mmmmmmmm oooooooo • 1 MM OO XX Idld oo zz MM>> • Ioomm MM XX moo —irjw 0)01 oo 00 (Ov< OD • (o (o lo (o m <D (o <o * M <*) n c*j o o n o ■ h. r» r» r*>■ rs. r.> h. f.. r«. in X u (/I X u too r»<» I M O I Mz a o s V* 3 Z X in in (*>n o> to Woo woo nr» h*M O) n r- r- # ■ r- UI 1 1 }o ««<««o to m •<(O a.UJ i ^X ^ «m 'ir ao H 1»O i 7 o. .1 i CD i m 1 >z CO A i-i CO CO ro CO coco I 1 1 1 1 1 o oi o>0)0)o fS4 (sj rvj CM CMz•H 1 1 1 1 1 1»-CMOJCM •HOzCO (O CO OO ^ tn J 3 CM CM CM CO comoot 1 1 1 1 1o^ ^ ^-H •“!<ooo o OO to •ae. o </» o o coco CM CM o CD CO CO CD0 1 1 cocn o —4 —4 —4 —ir^ o O)'OO cn o> 1o ICICIooooooo<J)o ««0«s«0<toOCMCMoOOOOOO CM 1 1 1 m 1 cn 1 •—1 1 1 1 1 1 •HCMcocncnCOCMCMm00oooooCM •H CO coco CO 7 o CM cn 00 coco 00 CO 1 •H 1 •H •M 1 1 1 1 1 1 —4 —4oOl^o o o OOOOO oeoto UJ Q <a. Ui cooe Xooeoc ►-<< MQQ X UJ bJi-ae ►- 1-4 »-• QO< Xuiol UJ a: UJ oeuflc ZIO l-IQ to O CO UI 3UJ <z a. 3 o:0 »-4 4-4 <Q-a. UIUI ocOzo< fvjX UJzz> •n <rt UJ QC UI4-4 >o •a O) CM aeSf a.<aeaeae < UiCLIL OCZUJ UII-tOh-»- ZU -l-i •HbJ>-33 <(/)<(/>(/) Komzz dJoe OO OCOl-IUU oe UJ Q. UIUJOCUJUI -l-JO-l-J UI I-to «? s oe to to to uuu 4-4 4-4 4-4 coco coco _lo QC >-4l-l 44 z CD ID<38888 (DID (DID tozuzzzoooUI •uui oecK Zo o. cu UI UI QC QC 1 —CD (DID (DID 44444 UIz oea:ae zz aeae <4 o OO UI oe •a*0*a*a*ao VENDORouu UlUlUJ UlUlUJ SSS 1 — 1 — to to to ooo zzz < UI *n 1 X 1- toom 2 >> 44 ^Z to to zz 4-44-4 ►-»- OCQC 22 UI 1- to 4 3 O q: K UJ X MINNEQASCO4- 1 — OO 44 UJUI o:oe o:a£ 44>> 44 ZZ NSPOTTEN BROS—1 a. X UI o 4-4 -J CDo a. zzzzz 4-4 >H 4-4 4-4 4-4 44444xxxxz xxxxx 44444 XXXXX o-co-owota. OOOOO 0.0.0. CL a. ■ 1 «■41 «■m ■« ID ID r- CMtntocn OO tnm Or^i^ O'cocn 40 CD 00 GO men OO 239821mm 09 00 min C'.l'.6666O CO O 00 CM »r>'444 ; • .1 *~z CM CM to I/O CM o) ^ OO 09 4Doo> r cnixo^ 4tO>-4 cn cn t'l'' r- r- (0(0 cn04 4 CM to 4 4 036OSS44 toco 292 292 .CMoaomro 00)0004*-4o> o m =}-H OO -< —4 cnen "Mcn -H -4 i 9 0>0)0>O)0)0)CD Ol 0)cnoocoeo00oooo030000 90Oz'N.'S.-M. •-4 MsV. —4 -H 'M 'S. Oa: O u.DATECM CM CM 'M'v'M. CD CO CO OOO CM V. CO O CM CM to CO OO CM ’M. COo CM O CM CM tOiO OO O >-b V-z 4-4 U a 00 o> —4 zu UI Xc>177400177400177400«« m m« m 177456« m m m 177462177462m« m m•.77474m ■ m m«77490« ■«« m 7754577545(0<0 (OU> to OO OO o oooooooooo fM CM (M fM rsl to CO to to to r>.r«-r^r^r« « —4 —4 o i r .‘••I ;3 i ‘f i.V :1 i I •I' ■1 O UJo< 00oo UJ X u UJ I o OzooeO 00 5Co (/)zo 00 o OOOOOOOOCM OOOOOOOOO) I I I I t I I I I o —<irurunimnirnD I I I « I I I I I o)ojo>0)o>o>ojojro 0)0)0)0>0>0>0)0>0rococororororof'oco I I I I I I I I I o>o> I I ro o CO ro CO CO f*> O) CD in m O) o> o> o> o> rMCMfMC«.«MOJt^ cNi rj oo oooo I I I I —I (M fsj ^ < oo CM CO CO CO 00 ^ o» rM(MCM(MC*OCOCO <<» •» < V I I I • I I t oooo o o o KCKCEaeccaiaca;^ aaLO.a.aolclo. i<<<<<<<<o I O o IV on O(/> UJo 000300000 ZZZZZZZZh-oooooooo<oooooooo>-U) (/)mo o»-«o X <<<<<<<<1-oooooooou. UJUiUJUJUJUJUJUJ*-< OOzz oc m •— UJ —I CO >-</)</> (/) UJK-ZH- <►-»- CDZUJZUXX 0X0 OO QC»-«UJI-<*9»-IIH UJ -UJ —I -J _J IX<XI- I t- </>-I (/) X UJ t/> <<CV<COX< Ui —i ui —I O —> —lu CV U —J O u oe Ul UJm 888888888 COCOCOCOCOCOCOCICO CO V)oooo coco (/)(/)<<<<<<<<< oeoo Z UJ> >£ oiC z oe z <<<<<<<<< IIXT •XIII ZZZZivTXXX<<<<<<<<< Q. (V Ol O. a. CV CL CV IV OOOOOOOOO CVCLCVCVU.(VCVa.CV oooooo<< iCCDoo o Kl-o o UJ Oto*d*0 Ou_l 6 Ulu>>-i-i o Ul O OO o oo tozz Ul <<(/)_l z 1-1 oo z o <oc •-I <Zt-t oo —1 CV CO<Ul Ul —J inocUlUlo1-Ul CV CVQC oc U)1- OU ooooooo aczaraezofoe it 11*1Il»l 111 XXXIIIIooooooof-i »-il-t >-« i-< )-t i-« iti It lltl It I It I l.ti.I DC oc a: a: Qc Qc oc ooooooo Ul (V oc 0 1 0>0)0>0>000)0>CFI «oooooaoaoaoGOOQ« UJ ►-< O CDCDCOJOCDCOIOCOCO OOOOOOOOO OIOI C7>O)Ol «o oo oo CO CO\\ —1 ~-i -H ■—1 CM CM fSI CM CM •n.\ 10(0 <o «o u>oo o o o o> Ol oj Ol cn o) o> 00 00 00 0)00 00 00 O <0 (O CO <o <o CO OOOOOOO on I/I CMo 00 w UJ Iu i w >oc UJ(/> Nl KJ »H CV c/>>-zo «■a m •««c coroooooeooooocoocn oo ooo 00 oo min mm moooomoo uiin at (OOOCD(Otf>0(0(CU>0 oo at Oat (0(0 oo -HOcnOCTicnOai CM CM 00 00 ro atmm oo oo OO momo-^cTiocM OlO)•-C 4*«HOO m ^iO U>a.-tom (7)0) —1 n r) 0)0) inar—ttoc^c^loat in CM O CM CM CM oz eoooooooooeooooooo cmcmcmcmcmcmcmcmcm (OCOUSUXOUXOJOUC CM CM u>«o UXD ooooooo 0 01 h, f~, r- r-, r-. t *. s '‘i ,• 4 '■'i ■i ‘1 •i 0 UJo<a. «»■o <o «9o Ulo<(/></> cn ^ < o) cn • I I I I 0> O) O) o> u>^(£> •HCMOinm I I I I IoomtniA cNMMtnmm ror) r>n ro I I I I I ^^*-4csir> OOOr^r^ <o oi « I 00 o>o> rviin 1 I •H *-# on o o I I Or^ —• o>o> o> n 00 m oo • I I CM oo O OQOO op no i ) )^ —< —*oo ooo 000 1 I )oooooo 000 1 I • rsj n n rjor- CM —« (N CMO-H I I I OOr>^ 'V $ X UJ DC 111 o Ul ae >cu 111Xo o C/1 > •a v%a.<o UIUIUUUzzooo OOaroeac xxao.0. 0.0. IUIU<<< UIUJ<<< i-t-OOQ zzzzzoooooliiiiouuuu (/)(/)(/>(/)(/) l.ll.lllil.ll.l 33333 (/) 10 (/) c/1 (/) to a: Ul X to<-I u. oto o Zi 8oe Q. QC Ul X to< 3 oc<o X to< 3 0£<o >-<m < Kl>-< 3 o:a: OO O.O. UIUJzz *-jn zz XX to to UIUJoo ►H •-« >> oc oc UIUJ (OtO >-< (O a 3m < o <o <u- m-i <-i<<zx <<oo zz t-HI-l >> UIUJ 'Id ^ o Ul O Xoo u.o 3< UJoe 00 _l<o •-I o UJ X z O to Of Ul Oz< o»-*z nnin n n n n n n »-l XXX oeotoc UIUIUJ 0.0.0. ooo U.U.U. ocococ ooozzz ►-* *-t l-( coco QQ XXX 333< o M 0.0.0. zzz ooo <0(0(0 O. 0.0. EhE XXX z 3 < «««««•m «■m oo CMOrsir^ior^OO in m oo ooo ooo oo OO ooooooirih^moom CVJCsi oo O m in OO ooo oo OO moo Ocnoto^fM CVfM 04 CM oo m fM r-~cor>in m o oo o o^ ca—1 C>J OO in in coin nn mm m^(7i CM CM 04 CM (MtMm mm CM CM cnr>nro ozo aco u.o >- I- iCo Ul Xo too (M«M(M<M(M to to (O to (O ooooo inininmtn eo 00 00 COOP to o o o>o»O! Oi o>o»O) O) 0)00 oo OP OP oo oo oo 00 oooowV.w V.\ w.-t —t .-t -H ^—4 CM 04 CM 04 04 (M <M CM CM CMww>>'m V.V.V.QO CD to <0(0 to to to to toOOoooooooo to m oo op f>. r>- t>» N. CM (Moo CD 0> r-r>»r'. tn in in ooo 0> O) o> o UJ <o w < 40 d. UJ X I u> O CM I o. (Oo *• w iCu ae U(/) Ul O X bJ oc llj © 3o Ul oe 3Cu Ul Xu O 1^ O >H in CM CO CM «• O C* O •M O I Io o W OI ato coco coco I I c- —I —I I I com mm coco CM u Ct uoz o hMOOZ >ZZ|-| OC*- to Ulo X LO OC UJ X Ul X u 3< UJu V Q£ < UJ 3 O OC ec t- O< o *- UJ to a: Q£ K t-t h-t< < a. a. </} Z3 II oca:<< ZZ l-CUl XX UlUJ(/)(/! Q- *- 3 _l i-iz u. < oc UJ UJ —I >J Ul Ul U o =3 U. a CL Z 3 CL O —I CL l-H »U C/5 Q. O Ou.u.< > OC UIOOUJ OCZZO. n »-i O Quil-I- Z><<ui 30QCQC(0 u CL Ul Ul a: -JXOOO < *1 o oc oc oc Ul Xujulu uiui< uiO OIL :s(oo z ococ o o I-I to oz1-l-C 0.0.3 u <z <<u.u.Ul l:o II u _I_I_I_I_J ►— 1—o C/5 3 oc 1-UL)O X <<<<< 1— 1— 1— H- ►-*</>oc CL Z<z<o Ul >->■ ococ UJ (O _J Ul ooooo 1— 1— 1— 1— 1—oc O CL X —I l-l-3 oOUJXUlzzuz o •“KCMCOO#Oz •J<OC t-i *o o UJ Z 33oo UJoc < u o OCMi^r-h. M U o CQ O uu oc aoooo _l(K —1 </5 o <UJ zzzzz <UJ _J O z Z UIUI ee z X 33333 1— ►“ $ I-<oc<IO UJ 3 <<1- Ul zo o CL U.U. u. u u.o1—X z X »-»to -J_l X o 5^ 9 z 3 < o oo oo oo oo mm ooo oo OO OOmooooooooataiooooooooo o CO CO mm cor*mm atat docD mm mm ooID "M r-r*.r-t-"cntn mm CM CM ooo -M-MCM CM CM CM CM CM CM mr> C» f'. CM CM »» O ^COOCOtO CO roroofooco r> ^ro-cc»fo CM ■"tfcocooim C O c>CM in n -M m t cn t»at 05 C7>05 05 O)9)OICO00ooOO0000 OO CO 00 COoVi\V.V.Vu 'vV.\z —c —1 -H —1 —I •-4oC>4 CM CM CM CM CM (M CsJ <NJUlV.\V.•N.V W V,V.o 1—<D CO CO CO <o COCO u>%o <o u.< O O o o O o oo O o o O >•d»-z l-C U z to oo <75 o •H —t nooOoO—< —1 •HatUlo>o>05 at C7>0105 cn o>OItft3Z1^r-~r^r-at u r- •M •H -t —1 —U —• >B ^ mm 0ULn Cl COUNCIL MEETING JUN 2( 1989 CITY OF ONONO \ . » c others Present Jennifer Watts - Admin, Ric Hanson - Triax Wally Roepke - Public Audience Shelly Quaas - Recorder MINUTES LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION EXCELSIOR CITY HALL 5:00 P.M. FULL COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, MAY 16, 1989 I• CALL TO ORDER Chairman Haggerty called the May 16, 1989 meeting to order at 5:08 p.m. ROLL CALL Directors Present Barb Brancel - Shorewood Jim Swartwood - Long Lake Tom Anderson - Medina Jim Olds - Excelsior Dennis Haggerty - Deephaven Andrea Bassett - Woodland Lesley Hughes-Seamans - Tonka Bay Carol Deaner - Victoria Jimmie Wright - Greenwood Richard Henry - Woodland Dave Stahr - Excelsior Dean Johnson - Shorewood Otto Wilczek - Minnetrista Jim Hillis - Greenwood I- APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION 5,16,89,1: Anderson moved, seconded by Brancel, to approve the minutes of April 18, 1989 as written. Motion carried unanimously. I. REPORTS A. TREASURER Treasurer's Quarterly Report: Olds reviewed the quarterly report and the revised budget for 1989 with the Commission. MOTION 5.16.89.2: Wright moved, seconded by Swartwood, to approve the 1989 revised budget on Appendix A. Motion carried unanimously. I MOTION 5.16.89.3: Olds moved, seconded by Brancel, to approve the Just Claims as written on Appendix B. Motion carried unanimously. B. ADMINISTRATOR Administrator Wattf informed the Commission that Triax has new channel cards being processed that will include the designation of channel 32 for a future educational access channel. Watts also reported that the cities of Woodland and Greenwood have approved the Joint Powers Amendment. The LMCCC financial review has also been completed. Watts reported that the NFLCP Conference is coming up July 12 through July 16, it will be held in Dallas, Texas. Approximate cost is $888.00 per person, which includes the conference, hotel end airfare. lilCCC MINUTES MAY 16, 1989 PAGE 2 IV. REPORTS CONTINUED - ADMINISTRATOR MOTION 5.16.89,4! Anderson moved, seconded by Wright, to authorize up to two (2) members to attend the NFLCP conference and to confirm the second person attending before sending the confirmation. Motion was discussed. It was asked if an alternate person could be set up in case a cancellation would arise. Motion was then approved unanimously. The Commission directed Watts to send a letter to Commission members who were not present at the meeting asking if they would be interested in attending the conference. C. ZBIM Ric Hanson of Triax reviewed his monthly report: Ending Basic Subscribers 5131 Basic Penetration 44.83% Total Pay Units 3809 Basic Subscriber Gain 41 Hanson reported to the Commission that construction has started in Hamel. Approximately 15.4 miles of cable will be completed by June 15. Triax has been having sume difficulty with Midwest Sports and have made a few alterations in their contract. Triax is not able to pick up all of the games scheduled to be picked up because of microwave feed problems. Midwest Sports sent out a revised schedule to Triax showing which games Triax will be able to receive. Wallace Roepke of Excelsior was in attendance at the meeting to complain about ghosting ak;d flickering problems with his cable. He called the service line ('*800'* number) several times, the operator took his name and phone number; Roepke never received a call back. Mr. Roepke also complained about the high rates and poor quality of service and feels the rates are rising and the quality is falling. Hanson apologized to Mr. Roepke for the poor service he has received. Hanson explained to Mr. Roepke that there may be some system leakage problems either on his set connection or possibly on the pole. Hanson will follow up on Mr. Roepke's complaint. Dean Johnson asked Hanson what was the motive to change the local Triax telephone number to an **800** number. Hanson explained it was changed for a ionalized concept to have one area receive all calls to < rol the delivery of messages. NOMINATING COMMITTEE Lesley Hughes-Seamans read off the names for nomination: Tom Anderson was nominated for Chairperson. Jim Swartwood was nominated for Vice Chairperson. Barb Brancel was nominated for Secretary. Jims Old.3 was nominated for Treasurer. The members at large nominated were Dennis Haggerty, Lesley Hughes-Seamans and David Stahr. c I IMCCC MINUTES MAY 16, 1989 PAGE 3 NOMINATING COMMITTEE - CONTINUED The Chair asked for any other nominations. There were none. MOTION 5.16.89.5; Stahr moved, seconded by Wright, to elect officers and the at large members as nominated. Motion carried unanimously. V. OLD BUSINESS Meeting Time Survey: Administrator Watts informed the CommiFsion that 5:00 p.m. on the third Tuesday of the month seems to be most favorable to Commission members. Johnson asked Hanson about the signal on Regional Channel 6. Hanson explained that the signal is noticeably improved. Fiber optics is an alternative solution to the signal problem. WCCO is looking into this idea although it is very expensive. ADJOU MOTION 5.16.89.6; Swartwood moved, seconded by Stahr, to adjourn the Nay 16, 1989 meeting at 5:58 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully Submitted, Shelly Quaas Recorder D EXCELSIOR STUDIO AGENDA I. Call to order II. Approval of Minutes III. Reports a) Officers b) Administrator c) Triax IV. Equipment Upgrade a) Computer b) Studio V. 1990 Budget Planning Subcommittee VI. Unfinished Business VII. New Business VIII. Adjourn 0 a /OQ c^) ary OF ORONa CITYof ORONO Post OfTice Box 66-CrysUl Say. MinnaaoU 55322• Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka June lit 1989 Mr. Bob Bruce 2205 Abingdon Way Long Lake, MN 55356 Dear Mr. Bruce, Thank you very much foe your lef.er that we received on May 31, 1989, regarding Highway 12. The questions you raise “Harding the place at which objectives become part of the process are most appropriate. The reas/on the focus has been on “d “P to this point rather than objectives relates to the fact that without the funding there would t’® f° ^ therHis somean/? rih-i<aetives would be considereo. once mere is indication that it will be going forward, then the appropriate p^He fir the" Usue that,you^ais\ will be Included in the early planning with the feasibility study. It would be helpful if you ® f ^the 5th through the 15th but please feel free to give me a call aft that. It is my recommendation at this point that ;e"f ® letter to MnDOT District 5, who will be in charge the effort should it be commenced, and request that there be H5?HtU?e ability for public review and comment in the establishment of the study's goals and < -ctives. Sincerely, yjnjJkMark E. Bernhardson City Administrator MEB/dh building a ZONING - 473-7357 assessing administration a finance - 473-7359 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-735•» May 16. 1989 i; W3/„35 ----:ii!i I • / /' Mr. Mark Bernhardson, Orono City Administrator 1335 Soutii Brown Road Orono, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Bernhardson: I'm writing with regard to the Highway 12 corridor evaluation and planning now underway. It is my impression that to date little citizen input has been solicited particularly from Orono residents. Of the recent meetings of the Corridor Task Force, I've attended, primarily elected officials and MN DOT Engineers have debated the topic and initiated next steps. In addition, development objectives and priorities were not discussed, rather, funding and MN DOT project protocol received the task forces attention. This raises two concerns: 1. The meetings avoid the more difficult and critical priority and objective setting process which shou*" proceed MN DOTS study of corridor placement. Citizen concerns should guide the study not be raised a ’ - mplaints to a finished MN DOT corridor plan. 2. Orono is essentially a residential community and as such it^^tizens are less organized in communicating their priorities. Glvdn this situation Vm concerned that during the planning stage Long Lake business district priorities will be heard and adversely effect near in Orono as a residential area. Below are what I feel should be Orono's priorities for the planning process. The purpose in r^y writing is to determine whether these priorities are the same as that represented as the Cities at planning sessions and to advocate these points of view. 1. In placement of the near in Highway corridor, residential should be considered the primary development priority, not business development or the current Business District. 2. First priority should be place on the current ^'..jdway or adjacent property for any road upgrade. . Development that diminishes or prevents the current roadway from being the primary site should be checked or held until a corridor is selected. 5100C:31 -2- 4. Planning should also consider the railroad and adjacent property as already similar zoning ana use as the Highway, and therefore a priority corridor alternative. 5. The corridor should attempt to preserve all wildlife and wetlands. In particular, the Luce Line should be protected as park area. Any information on Orono's agenda with regard to the long term development of Highway 12 as well as your guidance on how citizens can influence the process would be greatly appreciated. ny. Sob Bruce 2205 Abingdon Way Orono, m 55356 5100C:32 0 cC Dear Thank you for your support for my re-appointment to the Metro Waste control Commfssioa I was not re-appointed because Mr. Dirk DeVries would not support my continued service. He said he, "could not support me because of my vote on the 1969 budget" But, he voted for two DFL Commissioners to be re-appointed who voted as 1 did on the budget The staff of the Metro Council supported the staging and budget proposed by the Metro Waste Control Commissioa 1 had the full support of my fellow commissioners and for that I thank them. I also greatly appreciate the support of thirteen cities, ten senators including two DFL, twelve representatives from my area and Hennepin County Commissioner Tad Jude. My opposition had support from seven cities, three counties, two senators and one representative. My support was hardly "soft" as Mr. DeVries and Ms. Wv'itz have said. I did enjoy my four years of service to the Metro area, and 1 hope to continue my public service as the 6th Congressional District representative on the Minnesota Natural Resources Trust Commissioa I was appointed to this position by governor Rudy Perpich. Thank you again for your support / 1 COMMUlSriTY ITEWSLETTER SUMMER 1989 West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board HEAD START AVAILABLE TO SUBURBAN CHILDREN Head Start is a nationally recognized program. It helps children develop a positive self-concept Head Start gives children a chance to start school with the confidence and skills they need. It is a free comprehensive child and family development program for low income preschool children and their families. about themselves and their community. Children participate in the program six hours a day, two or three days a week, from September through May. At mid year, children who have attended two days a week exchange places with children on a three^ay schedule. Head Start is available at no cost to eligible families. Families aie eligible if they: • Live in Hennepin County; • Have children between 3 and 5 years old; ^ Head Start is a comprehensive program. It is an educational program for preschool children. They learn to get along with other children, explore their environment and prepare for school. Head Start also provides health and nutrition programs. There is strong parent involvement in • Meet Federal income guideline Head Start stresses that parents arw the prime teachers of their children. The program provides an environment where parents can learn with their children the Head Start program. Parents participate in the classroom and in policy making. . j parents can i If you are interested in applying for Head Start call 823-6361 for an application. 4 VAIL PLACE ’S NEW PROGRAMS Vail Place, helps adults with mental illness get back in the mainstream and maintain rewarding lives in the community. They have funding to offer new services and arf*. now part of the Hennepin County Regional Support Services Program. Its new hours are 8:30 am to 8:00 pm Monday through Thursday. Friday hours are 8:30 to 5:30 pm or 8:30 to 8:00 pm every other friday. Vail Place is open every other Saturday from noon to 4:00 pm. Vail Place’s regular services now include a housing specialist who makes weekly on-site visits to a clients home. The housing specialist has information on financial assistance and transportatiotL Group sessions are offered on topics that build self-esteem and promote independent living. Vail Place also offers new services from Pyramid Mental Health Center. A nurse is available on Monday from 3:00 to 5:00 pm. Nurses give information on medicines and help monitor client’s medications. They also offer a support group every Tuesday at 3:00 pm. Anyone who wants to join in on the expanded social and recreadonal programs can stop by after 3:00 pm to join the fim. For more information on Vail Place’s new services, call: 824-8061 (Mirmeapolis) or 938-9622 (Hopkins). VAIL PLACE Growing Toward Independence L GUIDEBOOK FOR THE DISABLED The Metropolitan Council has a guidebook for people with developn^eatal disabilities, their families tneir advocates. Tt’s Never Too Early, It’s Never Too Late” is about Personal Futures Planning. It focuses on people’s gifts, talents and abilities. The guide l^ok teUs how to develop personal relationships and positive roles in the community. It enables people to get more control of their lives and to build their skills and abilities. A personal futures plan is a person’s vision for what he or she would like to be or do. It is also a plan for making changes a:.d problem solving. A small group of people agree to meet and to help each other meet the goals in their personal futures plan. The guidebook is free from the Metropolitan Council’s Data Center, Mears Park Center, 230 E. 5th St, St PaukMN 55101 or caU 291-8140.I i-. . 'v ' ^ IMMUNIZATION CLINICS Immunization Clinics are being held in several suburban cities. The goal of the clinics is to combat seven different diseases - diphtheria, whooping cough, tetanus, mumps, measles, rubella and polio. These clinics are targeted for low income families. Ar^ resident of Hennepin County may attend the clinic. Children not accompanied by a parent or guardian must have a signed official consent form. They also ask that you bring all of vour immunization records to the clinic. A donation of three dollars per immunization is requested; however. No one will be refused if they are unable to pay. The times, dates and addresses of the clinics are listed below: Minnetonka Ridgedale YMCA 12301 Ridgedale Drive 2:00-4:00 p.m. June 15, August 17 Hopkins Community Health Dept. Offices 810 1st St. So./2nd floor 2:00-4:00 p.m. July 20, August 18, Sept. 21 Plymouth City Offices 3400 Plymouth Blvd. 2:00-4:00 p.m. July 7, September 1 Mound Westonka Community Center 5600 Lynwood Blvd. 2:00-4:00 p.m. July 21, Sept. 15 Bloomington Bloomington Division of Health 1900 West Old Shakopee Road 8:00-9:30 a.m. & 4:30-6:00 p.m. July 11, August 1, September 5 Eden Prairie Immanuel Lutheran Church 16515 Luther Way 2:00-4:00 p.m. August 4 Brooklyn Center Community Health Department 6601 Shingle Creek Parkway 9:00-11:30 a.m. July 11, July 25, August 8, August 22, Sept. 12, Sept 26 If you have any questions or want to know about other sites, please call Hennepin County Community Health Department at 348-2741 or Bloomington Division of Health at 887-9603. Bring Immunization Records to Clinics •T,''- ■ - WOMEN ACHIEVING NEW DIRECTIONS There is a new program for low income working single mothers. The program serves women who "fall between the cracks" to be better workers and get better jobs. Each woman attends a workshop series focusing on the skills needed to keep and be promoted in a job. Each women will learn more about herself and her interests and skills. She will look at the blocks to her success and will set goals and a plan to reach them. Each women will also have individual career/job counseling. She will be guided and supported by a women who has been successful in her work. Women Achieving New Directions offers services on a sliding fee scale. No woman is turned away because she cannot pay. Any low income working single mother in the metro area may be eligible no matter where she lives. If you or a woman you know is interested, call Janette at 521-1232. DO YOU STILL NEED "MEDIGAP" INSURANCE? On July 1, 1988, the President signed into law the Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act of 1988. Before this people purchased "Medigap insurance" to cover some of the cost that Medicare does not pay. They are now wrong in assuming that the new law gets rid of their need for "Medigap" insurance. Legal experts warned that if you wanted a "Medigap" policy before the Act, you will probably still want one. You still need "Medigap" type insurance because the Act still leaves major gaps in Medicare coverage. If you are low income, you should first try and get Medical Assistance. If you belong to an HMO, you probably don ’t need extra insurance. If you would like a copy of the Seniors Law Project article on the new Law, you can write the Community Legal Education Program, 2507 Frement Ave. North, Minneapolis, MN 55411, or call (612) 522-6636 and ask for the Catastrophic Coverage Article. THANK YOU ENERGY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM VOLUNTEERS The Energy Assistance Program & the suburban Hennepin county area salute these individuals whose volunteer efforts "WARMED HOMES AND HEARTS" during the 1988-89 hearing season: Phyllis Allison * Dorothy Armstrong Ruth Ashwood Ruth Balto Jack Bamum Shirley Bamum Ruth Barr • Harris Baxter • lone Biggs Gail Brand * Loren Brand * Louise Braun Ruth Brebner John Broude * Elizabeth Brown Ann Browning Pearl Cannon * Caron Carlburg * Norma Richards-Carlson* Rose Deiley Char Downs John Dysart • Martha Fallstrom * EsteUa Filkins « Ralph Friskey * Howard George Loraa Goyns Del C -ski • Patria drais Hans Gunderson Marty Guritz • Ray Guritz • Lucille Hallen * Emily Heese * Louaime Hinton Jean Humphrey * Betty Ihle Russell Jacobsen Bemadinc Jaffe * Nathan Jahr Heloise KJa-diihbah David Knipp * Marion Koch * Kersten Larson Florence Levy • Juanita Linder Irma Lionberger * Jo Sadie Love La Dean McWilliams Mary Margaret Mader • Fran Magoffin John Magoffin Roy Markstrom * Charlotte MeUom * Art Ness • Heidi Noetzel Grace Norris Dotrie O’Brien * Paul Peabody Leona Peterson * Bernice Putt * Kate Quady Mildred Ramus Dorothy Rauschendorfer* Kathy Roline Annette Ronan Peg Schot necker • Jean Schrosder Ncl Sorenson Richard Stein Bob Strelow • Joe Ulaszko Marian Usset • Belinda Walker Dian Whelan Debbie White Deanna Woods Denotes RSVP membership THANK YOU ENERGY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM SUPPORTERS The Energy Assistance Program honored its volunteers at a recognition event May 3, 1989 aboard the Hiawathia Dinner Train. Funds for this event are not part of the Energy Assistance budget. A sincere "THANK YOU" to the following businesses, vendors, and friends of the Energy Assistance Program who donated money or merchandise for thU Volunteer Recognition Luncheon: Minnegasco Citizens State Bank • St. Louis Park Natural Resources Corporation First National Bank of Wayzata First Bank Robbinsdale Nutech Engineers, Inc. Guy Detlefsen How Enterprises, Inc. - The Print Shop Northwest Tonka Lions State Bank of Mound Golden Valley Bank Citizens State Bank-Robbinsdale Branch Ridgedale State Bank Local Oil Company Sipc & Gray Oil Company First Western Bank Norwest Bank Minnesota - Hopkins Gleason Printing, Inc. Wm. H. McCoy Petroleum Fuels, Inc. Rettinger Bros. Oil Co. Olympic Oil Co., Inc. American Slate Bank of Bloomington Northwood Gas Co., Inc. Osseo Lioness’ Wright Hennepin Coop. Electric Assoc. Norwest Bank Minnesota- Brooklyn Park Fuel Oil Service Company, Inc. Klaers Oil Company, Inc. Beaudry Oil & LP Company Federated Co-ops, Inc. Crown Oil, Inc. The W. Gordon Smith Company Bill Clark Oil Company The Bank Wayzata Otten Brothers Nursery Bachman’s VFW-George R. Wolff Post 425 . . t MAZEBUSTERS The Mazebusters program begins training 10 new Volunteers on July 18, 1989. Program funds are from the McKnight Foundation Aid to Families in Poverty. West Hennepin Human Services sponsors the Mazebusters program. Mazebusters is a peer counseling program. Participants receive training as peer-counselors and information and referral specialists. After training participants volunteer in community agencies. They volunteer four hours per week. Mazebusters help other low income people receive available services. They receive a $500 voucher of their choice at the end of their volunteer service. The program pays all related child care and transportation costs. Selections for new Mazebusters start soon using the existing waiting list. If you are a person of color, unemployed, receive AHX^ and feel that you have limited options, please call 920-5533 to find out more about the program. The program serves low-income participants from the We't Hennepin Suburban Area. West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board 4100 Vernon Avenue South St. Louis Park. Minnesota 55416 (612) 920-5533 Bulk Rate U.S. Postage PAID Permit No. 1387 Mpls., Minn. MARK BERNHARDSON, ADMIN. ORQNQ CITY HAUL BOX G6 CRYSTAL BAY MN 553c:3 FUNDED BY COMMUNITY ACTION FOR SUBURBAN HENNEPIN (C.A.S.H.) THE ECONOMY Study shows Just how far workers will drive Kathy Novak is an economic analyst in the DIED Policy Analysis Office. w. I- joiA.<y mBt ‘ 1 BY KATHY NOVAK I abor market littks between the T win I Cities and Greater Minnesota are ■ stronger today than they were in 1980. An estimated 56.000 workers from Greater Minnesota were employed in the Twin Cities in 1988. an increase of 64 percent from the 1980 census. According to a recent survey, the number of workers commuting into the Commuting Counties for the Twin Cities Metro Area IZ ■' ^ PERCENT commuting Afp.1 I Lms lhan 4*i Afe.i 2 5Sl£l2’» Alfa 3 More than Twin Cities was more than total employ ment in Duluth, Greater Minnesota’s most populous city and the fourth largest city in the state. The Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development (DTED) sur\eyed 1,270 employed residents of three areas outside the Twin Cities metropolitan area to determine where they worked. Greater Minnesota counties were grouped into study areas on the basis of the percentage of com muting employment in 1980. Since Commuting Counties for the St Cloud '—w n Metro Area A Crow Winq B Mpnnrpin C Isanti 0 Mfftifr E Mill*? Uics F Mpmson G Ramsey H Roseau 1 Sw'lt j Todd K Wnqhl legend ■ Commulinq Couf'lirs ■ St Cloud Metro Area 1980. growth in commuting has occur red in Areas 2 and 3 (see chart). The resident work force in both of these areas also has increased since 1980. As a result, a larger snare of ar. e.xpanded Greater Minnesota work force is now employed in the Twin Cities. Sixty percent of all Greater Minnesota commuters live closest to the Twin Cities metropolitan area in rtrea 3. where 44 percent of the resident work force is employed in the Twin Cities. Destination: St. Cloud A t. Cloud, central Minnesota’s ^ largest city, is also a commuter W destination. According to a recent study, 34 percent of the employees of Si Cloud industrial businesses live outside the city of Si Cloud. Ninety-six percent of the employees of these firms live in the Si Cloud metropolitan statistical area, that includes Benton, Steams and Sherburne counties. The reaiaining 4 percent of the employees who commute from out side the greater Si Cloud area come from 49 communities in 11 counties. There is an overlap of commuting between Si Cloud and the Twin Cities. Benton, Steams and Sherburne counties all are in the Twin Cities labor market area. Some of the commuters who work at the Si Cloud industrial busi nesses live in the seven-county Twin City metropolitan area. These findings are based on a survey co-sponsored by the Si Cloud Area Economic Devel opment Partnership Inc and the Si Cloud Area Planning Organi zation. Area 2 accounts for 31 percent of Twin Cities commuters. But only 16 percent of the employed residents of Area 2 work in the metropolitan area. Area I contnbutes less than 10 percent of Greater Minnesota commuters, and just 1 percent of Area 1 workers have Twin CitieS'based jobs. By 1988, the share of jobs held by Twin Cities commuters had grown to 4.4 percent of total Twin Cities employ ment In 1980, 3.2 percent of all Twin Cities jobs were held by people who lived in Greater Minnesota. Growth in commuting outpaced the growth in Twin Cities employment by a substantial margin. The number of metropolitan area jobs grew from 1.04 million in 1980 to 1.28 millic in 1988, an increase of 22 percent Dunng the same penod. the number of Greater Minnesota commuters increased by 64 percent from 33,866 to 55,692. As a result of the growth in both employment and commuting, these people had an increased share of a larger metropolitan employment base. For ijorc information on this study, contact the Policy Analysis Oflicc at 612/296-8341. Network provides easy access to business information BY EUGENIEde ROSIEIT jt ’-^iluablc aii.d new information A referral service is open for business in Minnesota. The U.S. Depart ment of Commerce and the Minnesota Economic Resource Group havejomed together to sponsor EBiN — the Economic Business Information Network. EBIN is designed to increase awarc- of the wide range of federal and .. 'ita and make it easier for users to l* V * i information tliev need. EBIN is a network >f 75 affiliates, consisting of cooperating regional devel opment commissions, small business development centers, libraries, colleges and universities, and state agencies. The affiliates are located throughout the state. Most EBIN affiliates are members of the Minnesota Census Data Center and can provide demographic data to accompany the economic and business information. EBIN researchers are trained by the U.S. Department of Commerce to instruct users on how to use the system and how to study the research matenal. An array of information available through EBIN affiliates includes but is not limited to federal census data (population, housing, retail and whole sale trade, services, manufacturing, construction, agriculture, transportation and mineral industries), gross state product, personal income, surveys of plant capacity and data on minority- owned businesses. Access to global materials includes foreign trade statistics, country demographic profiles and inter- nation^ population projections. State government has an abundance of data available through EBIN. It includes such information as sales and use tax colleaions, employment and wages, occupation and industry projec tions, population estimates, Comfxire Minnesota, the annual Economic Report to the Governor, the Minnesota Labor Market Review and more. For further information about EBIN, conuct Dave Rademacher, EBIN Coordinator, Minnesota State Planning Agency, 3(X) Centennial Building, Sl Paul Minnesota, 55155,6 12/297-3255. Metro companies moving back to Gieater Minnesota A recent preliminary study on A metro area corporate expan- sion since mid-1980 by the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development’s Policy Analysis Office, shows that job creation in Greater Minnesota has taken an upswing. Between 1982 and 1986, some state-based corporations closed branches and plants outside the Twin Cities metro area. However, from 1986 through 1988, this situa tion changed, according to informa tion from the Minnesota Depart ment of Jobs and Training. In the last three years, corporations are again opening branch offices or plants in Greater Minnesota, con tributing significaody to new job creation. For further information about the study, contact Emesto C. Venegas, an economic analyst in the Policy Analyse Office at 612/297-1408. Employment Growth Mlnneapolls/St. Paul Metro Area 79,800 Jobs Greater Minnesota 50,000 Jobs Third Quarter, 1986 Third Quarter, 1988 M/WESOn EMTfiPRfSE • SUMM£R "S9 / 15 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS Regular Meeting, 7:30 p.a. Wednesrtay,Hay 24,1909 Tonka Bay City Hall 2. Roil Ceil Ntflberj. ortunt; Abienti Thoeaa Reese, Vice Chair, Hound; Harvin Bjorlin, Tonka Bay; Jan BosMinkel, Secretary, Minnetonka Beach; David Cochran, SreenMOod; Bert Foster, Deephaven; Thoaas Martinson, Hayzata; Robert Slocua, Woodland; John Malinka, Victoria (arrive during the aeeting). Also present: David ArndorTer, Consultant; Charles LeFevere, Counsel; Lt. Larry Peterson, Hater Patrol; Eugene Stroaaen, Executive Director. JoEllen Hurr, Chair, Qrono; Jaees Brathwol, Excelsior; John LeHian, Treasurer, Hinnetrista; Robert PilJsbury, Minnetonka; Robert Rascop, Shorewood. Oath of Office Charles LeFevere adeinistered the Oath of Office to Douglas Babcock, appointed to the Board by the City of Spring Park and Babcock Mas Melcoeed. Reese then declared a quorue present. 3. Reading of Minutes Bjorlin aoved, BosNinkel seconded, that the ainutes of 4/26/89 be approved as subaitted. Motion carried unaniaously. 4. Public Coaaents There Here no coaaents froa the public. 5. Bffioclt A. Vice Chair Reese 1) Reese announced the Board's Lake inspection tour Hill be held June 10, 0:15 a.a. This Mill folloH tne regular 7:30 a.a. aeeting of the "Dock" Coaaittee. Meabers Mere asked to confira their attendance Mith the LHCO office. R* Treasurer/Finance 1) In the absence of Treasurer Lenaan, Stroaaen presented a financial condition report as of 4/30/99 shoning Operating Fund nith a Balance of 188,868; Save the Lake Mith a Balance of $63,980 and Eurasian Water Milfoil Hith a Fund Balance of $571,92). Slocu« Aovedf Cochran seconded that the Financial Condition report approved as subaitted« Motion carried unani <nousl y. 4/30/1* Bjorlin eovedi Slocue seconded that the payeent oF bille ia III# w aeount oF 132,222.23, check nuaberi 5457 through 5494, be approved •• •laiaittaifii 2) Audit of Vouchers for Payeent Notion carried unaniaously. C.Sii.ndi.ng. CaeiillEfi nWATEA STRUCTURES . Chair Cochran mm dock Ltkti a) r .netonka Boat Morkf fOrono) density and new increase 6 BSU on BroNns Bay and 42 BSU on Tanager recoaaendation for approval based on aeenities as lubaitted. blHinnetonka Boat Works (Nayzata)variance, density, and nen dock license to add 12 peraanent BSU; coaaittee recoeaendatiofi for approval based on aaenities as subaittcd. mmrn . .V, . ■■ Cochran reported the Minnetonka Boat Works have asked that boil be aoved forward to the June eeeting. Cochran, aoved, Foster seconded that the Minnetonka Boats Works agenda itaaa advanced to the June 29 Board meeting. Motion carried unaniaoualy. St. Alh'i License i Bay Marina Special Density Perait and Naw Dack Applicant requests further consideration at the June Board aaeting to praaant additional facts for clarification of their application. The aotion to approve the Special Density Perait and New Dock License failed to pass at the 4/26 Board eeeting. LeFevere subeitted a Mceorandue on the appli* cation providing background, effect on fishing and public access to the lake, lopact of the proposed facilities on nearby land uses, iepact of the proposed facility on recreational use of the lake, nature of the proposed facility, and evaluation of aaenities agreed to by the applicant. This was done in advance of the Findings and Qrder due to the prospect of litigation the applicant has s iggested eay be necessary in their case as a result of the non>approval. LeFtvert then reviewed Robert s Rules of Order on voting requireeents necessary to rescind the Board action in response to Foster's question on the itee. A aajority vote of the entire Board is required (eight votes) to rescind the action without an advance notice. A aajority of Board acabers present are required if there is notice of intent given in advance of the aeeting that such a aotion would be aade. Foster signified his intent to sake a aotion at the June 28 Board aeeting to rescind the Board's previous action on the St. Alban s Bay Hanna application. d) WayzatA Yacht Club Environaantal Aiiastaent Mork Shtet (EAN) Board received Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order in the natter of the deterainat1 on of need for an Environaental assessaent Morksheet for the Mayzata Yacht Club Hanna on Lake flinnetonka, Wayzata, Hinnesota. Duane Markus, 405 BushaMay Rd., Wayzata, petitioner to the Environeental Quality Board (EOB) for an EAW on the Wayzata Yacht Club Teeporary Dock and District Noonnq t^rea (DMAi Extensions, questioned LMCD s interpretation of EQB Rules Part 4410,460,subpart 2B. The executive director called Markus' attention to the rules stateaent ehich provides that projects for ehich all qovernnental decisions have been eade are exeapt froa envi ronaental **evieN. It is on this basis that the Conclusions to the Findings of Fact base ii% Order that the LHCO Mill not prepare an EAM. The executive director further pointed out that in the Conclusions, Itea 2 aakes reference to a discretionary E^W recoaaended to be done in advance of any future application for a siailar or greater teeporary DMA extension. Cochran aoved, Slocua seconded that the Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order in the aatter of deteraination of need for an environaental assessaent Mork sheet *0i the Wayzata Yacht Club be approved as presented. Motion carried unaniaously. e) Teeporary extension/low water variance Cochran auved, Foster seconded that the folloHing teeporary extensions/low water variances be approved as recoaaended: m Lafayette Ridge Hoeeowners Association subject to a conforeing site plan showing no encroachaent into the cast setback area (2 Minnetonka Power Squadron for extension of 10 docks froa 96', to 9 docks at 175' and 1 dock at 90' <3) Upper lake Minnetonka Yacht Club (Shorewood) froa 275'to 400' Motion carried unaniaously. f) Suspension of peraits for residential teeporary dock extensions for 90 days, recoaaended for approval subject to guidelines prepared by staff. Stroaaen subaitted Guidelines for Teaporary Residential Dock Extensions without a foraal perait application. Discussion resulted in changes per the revised copy, attached. Cochran aoved, Slocua seconded that the Guidelines for Teaporary Residential Dock Extensions (without a foraal perait application) be approved as aaended. Motion carried unaniaously. g) 1909 Dock License Renewals It was aoved by Cochran, seconded by Boswinkel, to approve the following 19B9 dock license renewals including Orders and stipulations: Bean s Greenwood Manna Excelsior Bay Yacht Club - continued Gray s B«y Rtsort and Harina E.*(celiior Bay Aafociates, Inc. Tha Harboraqa LaktNinds Aiiociation Libbs Bay Boat Club Hapla Crtit Estattf NtadoMbrook Boat Clubyloc. Hathodiit Lakasidt Ataaably Hinnatonka Boat Rantalf and Edqauatar Harina Hinnatonka Boat Horki <Hayzata) Hinnatonka Boat Morks lOrono) Hinnatonka Edgauatar Apartaants Hinnatonka Portabla Oradging Hinnatonka Yacht Club Hound, City oi North Shora Oriva Harina Schaitt'i Harina Baton Villaga Aiaociation Haldan Tract X Ounari Nayzata, City of Notion carriad unaniiouily. h) Bidaona Point HoaaoMoari Aiiociation Hultipla dock taaporary dock axtaniion Ion uatar varianca aporovad 3/U/09 Nil raconiidarad bacauia LHCO licania Ordar rastricti any dock racon^igurationi, pariitting axtansiun only. Bjorlin raportad Gidaoni Point HoiaoNoari Aiiociation hava ra-appliad ♦or a taaporary dock axtaniion parait ir liau of tha pravioui raquait to raconfigurata. Bjorlin aovad, Cochran lacondad that tha Taaporary Dock Extaniion/Taaporary Lon Hatar Varianca for Bidaon Point HoaaoNnari Aiiociation to alloa an axtaniion into tha Laka of 100*, BO* ac - than praiantly, ba approvad. Notion carriad unaniaouily. i> City of Oaophavan taaporary DHA axtaniion parait raquaiting to aova loutharn 4 buoyi to nortbarn adga, to allON for tha taaporary dock axtaniion grantad praviouily. Cochran aovad, Toitar lacondad that tha taaporary DHA axtaniion for tha City of Oaaphavan ba approvad. Notion carriad unaniaouily. Board agraad to aaand tha Aganda to aova foruard to tha raport to accoaaodata tha public. LAKE USE COHHITTEE. Poitar for Chair Pillibury Laka Uia Coaoittaa a) Natar Club Halt Sport I Harina, Inc. ipacial avant parait. Action to approva aftar-tha-fact uai not racoaaandad by tha axacjtiva diractor, tha City of Mayzjta adviiing that thay hava no intantion of p«'’oitting thii or any futura uia ot citv docfci for axcluiiva ihow iponior uiai. Tha Board concurrod in tha racoaoandation. b) A1 It Alaa'f Chirttr Lictntt Rtvit»« The Board action of 4/26/89 approving the taaporary wine and beer license, included with Laebm and Corporate Charters teeporary Uquor/wine and beer license applications. No further action needed. t) Charter Boat Registration Renewals Board received eighteen applications for charter boat renewals, two new registrations and two late apptications. The Board discussed hoee ports and coeeercial docking for charter boats at r’ftidtntial docks. The ■Kecutive director advised the Code defines coeeercial docks at those used io conjunction with a coeeercial or revenue producing business enterprise. Lt.Pftarson added that the Water Patrol receives coeplaintt froo coeeerciol placet that charter boats use their docks, and their paseengert use their parking lots. Frad Baae, A1 6 Alea'p, said they dock two boats at a residential property adjacent to the restaurant but do not load there. He stated soet of the litteW ports-of-cal1 do not have parking space for custoeers, this being a problee it the City of Excelsior eunicipei docks, where charter boats also circle in the Bay waiting to load. f., •Wi, ‘IIS'I Foster aoved Cochran seconded that the LHCD staff organize an evaluation •# docking considerations for charter boats stcrting in Septceber. Motion cirriotf unaniaously. Foster aoved, Cochran seconded that the following charter boat license be approved contingent upon passing Water Patrol safety checks! rtntwale Ai & Aiaa s j, ri, nr, vi, x, u Colossus Snail World Godfather II Lady of the Lake Hiss Deduction Husic ilan 111 Queen of Excelsior Seanote Halfnote Sunboat I Sunboat II Hhyknot 111 Notion carried unanieously. The Board received registrations for two new charter boats, Godfather be docked at North Star Narina and Private Parties I, whose berthing location was changed frow Crystal Bay to Harrison Bay. Ill to Foster noued, Bjorlin seconded that the new registrations for Godfather 111 and Private Parties I be approved, contingent upon passing Water Patrol safety checks. Notion carried, Cochran, Bjorlin and Babcock voting nay. LeF#v«re pointed out that the registration of chartor b9«i aulti'step project with the purpose, originally, to qatlioi has betn done and the Board is now in the position to qO li application process. Board further received late applications froo KafOl mm Tonka Bay Karina and Miss Minnetonka, berthed at Bean's Breenwnod renewals. Foster eoved, Boswinkel seconded that the charter boat renewals for Karob I Olli rr-' ■ Hiss Minnetonka be approved, contingent upon passing Hater Patrol safety cbeckt. Motion carried unanieously. Special Event Inspection Report and Deposit Refunds Foster eoved, Boswinkel seconded to approve the Special Event inspection report and approve the deposit refund for the Hoiiday“Johnson Crappie Contest April 22. Motion carried unanieously. e) Lt. Larry Peterson reported there have been six BHI arrests and all buoys are in place. Board returned to the agenda order 2. EURASiArL WATER MILFOIL TASK FORCE. Chair Reese a) The MN CNR permit for acreage of weeds to be harvested was by the Executive Director. An initial permit of 500 acres has been with the provision that an assessment of the experience will be eade three to four weeks into the program. Expansion of the acreage will be open to further consideration according to the DNR ’ s Ecological Services representatives on the Task Force. reviewed approved, bl Reese reported the estiaation of weeds which can be cut with six harvesters (5 LMCD and 1 Hennepin County Parks) will exceed the aeount of acreage the DNR is comfortable with for the first year. Reese visited the factory in Waterloo, N. T. and after conferring with the manufacturer a change was approved to extend the cutting swath to fifteen feet. The fixed wings were changed to a hydraulic activation at an adoitional cost of 1550. per machine. The eanufacturer will allow cancellation of the fifth harvester, ^he penalty being minor, based on the contractor's out of pocket expense. Reese indicated he was impressed with the operation but does anticipate a slight delay in delivery. Bids have been received for an additional 52' shore conveyer for areas. Reese recommends acceptance of the bid of UMl at 118,000. more shallow Cochran moved, Fester seconded approved, change in the wings conveyer at 110,000. Motion carr the cancellation of one harvester be j per machine and purchase of one shore u an 1mous1y. c) Proeotional Plans. Strommen reported the Public tape will be ready in about ten days. Service video There Hill be a Praine Korae Carriage Classic show in Hamei on June 24, 25. The entire adaission proceeds cf 14.mO per person will be given to the Euratian Water ttilToil Fund. Without objection from the hoard, ticlets will be lent to the* Tor sale to support the fund. The Heile*ann Brewery is giving 10 cents per case for all beer sold in Minnefota this summer to the Freshwater Foundation for £Wt! resea. c?. alternative Meed treataent methods. The potential value is over I5«',000. The Legislature has approved 1250,000 to the DNR for Eurasion Water Milfoil education programs control as a state wide infestation problem. The LegiflotufO elieinated line items in the "water resources bill" which would have benofilotf the LHCD but the DWR received f2,20M,0rH.< for water projects and the LMCO expocto it will include funds for the comprehensi.'e manageinent plan. d> Subcommittee Reports The Board was given at. Eurasian Mater Milfoil Fund 1989 budget and financial condition report snowing budget and expenses to 4/30/89 includiflf encuebrances for equipment on order. Adjustments will be made for tMf cancellation ot the one harvester, wing changes on other harvesters and purcMlit of an additional conveyer. The difference between the latter equipoant cMoilfOt will be placed in reserve for equipment. Minnetonka Boat Works will sell a wori boat at its cost to the Diftrict fOf 18,600 for use during the summer - a Larson 165 h.p. I.O., and art MilllAf buy it bad for I6i>u0, , with the District s option to keep it at the and of tilt aaason. The Board concurred in this acquisition arrangement. ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Chair Reese, Consultant Arndorftr. a) Management Plan Report. Arndorfer submitted a status report of tha various plans as of May 1 and a schedule of meetings in June. He stressed tha beginning of the Intergovernmental section of the Stakeholders Studies. This includes development of Memorandum of Understanding with other agmncifS, wetlands management to be important segment. He solicited members of the Board to tarve on this Coaaittee. Reese requested a firaing up of dates for tub- committee meetings ,suggesting at least a two month projection. 5. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR S REPORT a) The 1968 Audit has been completed, letter will be available at the June meeting. The audit and management b) Diana Nhite has give notice that she will employment in June, alter six aonths, lor family ramsons. A bookkeeping position replacement is underway. be terelnating starch lor the cl Strommen supplied the Board with a follow up tetter to the Chair of tha System Coamittme of the Metropolitan Council following their May 9 Public Hearing on the Lake Minnetonka Park, Specifically the letter addressed statements made at the Hearing regarding the number of public accesses on the \ v;„ Lake and parking availability, stateeent in variance Nitll OtIlsr piiklic statift1cs. d) Stroanen subaitted a list of events echeduled during June and asked the Board to observe the activities when possible* He aleo lubnitted his contact suaaary for April and Hay. 6. Unfinished Business BosMinkel requested the staff do research on the parking of charter boats on private property, including the history of charter boat licensing. 7. Nfu Business There eas no other nee business B. Adjourneent It Mas aoved by Bjorlin, seconded by Halinka, to adjourn. Notion carried unanieously. Heeting adjourned at 9i30 p.e. Subaitted by: Jan BosMinkel, Secretary Approved by: JoEllen L. Hurr, Chair LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT GUIDELINES FOR TEMPORARY RESIDENTIAL DOCK EXTENSIONS (wlchouc a formal permit application) LNCD Coda S2.01, 8ubd. 2 d) requiraa that during pariodi whan tha Lake laval falla balow 929.4 faat and when no declared by raaolution of tha Board, tha Executive Director may ianue permits for temporary dock axtansiona beyond Che authorised dock use area subject to certain limitations. 1. Residential docks sMy be extended beyond the authorised dock use area (DUA) (the DUA being the area bordering on the Lake which extends into the Lake a distance equal to the site Lake frontage sMSSurcd at right angles to the side site lines, and not extending into the Lake a dis* tance greater than 100 feet measured on a line parallel to the site side lines as extended into the Lake) on the following conditional a. Dock Is extended only to the extent necessary to meet the normal navigable water depth the location had at 928.6 feet. b. No addlflonal watercraft may be docked than permitted prior to the extension as authorised by the LNCD Code. If two or more neighbors combine docks, landowners are advised that up to four restricted (over 16 feet long, or use motors of over 10 hp) watercraft may be stored at a dock, provided the watercraft are o%med by the owners of the combined docks. c. The extension shall be permitted only during the 1989 season. d. The extension shall be a temporary, seasonal type dock. e. Adjacent dock use area shall not be encroached. Dock must maintain required side setback (10 feet for first 50 feet, 15 feet for next 50 feet, 20 feet over 100 feet) from the extended property line to the dock or watercraft, without written petmission of the neighbor involved. f. Subject to inspecticn by the Hennepin L'v^ <rty Sherlf's Water Patrol to assure no hasard to navigation exists. g. Apply red reflective material to end and all sides of dock when ex* tended beyond 100 feet in open water. 2. Residential docks in restricted channels will continue to require exten sion permits to assure interference with navigation is avoided. Adopted by the LMCD Board of Directors this 24th dsy of May, 1989 JoEllen L. Hurr, Chair LAKE MINN^:T0NKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT NEUS RCLCASE Jim I2i IW Contact: Gmrm Strowwan M73-7033 SUBJECT: Tcnporary Rasidtntial Dock Extansions Allowad Uithout Parmlt Racognizing tha naad for inaadiata rasponsa and tha potantial for tha incraaaad raquiranant for axtansions of residantial dockst tha LHC^ Board agraad to waiva tha foraal written application for a period of % days^ according to LHCH Chair JoEllan Hurr-i Orono* It is also anticipated that any repeat of further lake level drops axpariancad in tha sunMar of ISM could precipitate an unmanageable rasponsa for permits* The Board is confident that residents will only extend their docks necessary to reach the water levels needed to support their watercraft at docks- The expanse of dock extensions is a self-limiting factor in the observations of some directors* Persons interested in specific information may receive a copy of the guidelines by calling the LMCOi M73-7033* or stopping in at the Uayzata officesi MOS E* Lake St*i at the Uayzata Depot* EWTOHS MOTE! Please pick up the GUIDELINES on the attached sheets item !<• a thru gi and item 2^ to assist your readers at this time with the new GUIDELINES* Thank youi LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT CUIDBLIHB8 FOB TBHPOBART BE8IDEHTIAL DOCK EXTEHSIONS (without • {orul ponitt oppllcatlon) UWB Co8« 12.01, 8ubd. 2 d) ruqulruu that during porloda whan tha falla batow *2*.* faat and whan ao daelarad by raaolutlon Baaeutlwa Dlraetor My laaua panalta for taaporary dock axtanalona bayond tha authorlaad dock uaa area aubjaet to eartaln llwltatlona. 1. Baaldantlal docka «y b. axtandad bayond (DOA) (tha OOA balng tha araa bordarlng on tha Laka which axtanda I tha Laka a dlatanca agual to tha alta Laka *5®"**f* 'ijj! anglaa to tha alda alta llnaa, and not axtandlng Into tha Laka a dla tanca graatar than 100 faat Maaurad on a llna parallal to tha alta alda Iin«a at axtandad Into tha Uka) on tha following conditional a. Dock la axtandad only to tha extant nacaaaary to Mat tha norMi navlgabla watar dapth tha location had at 928.6 faat. b. Ho additional watercraft My ba dockad than panalttad axtanalon aa authorUad by tha LMCD Code. If two or aK»ra conblna docka, landownara are adviced that up to four raatrlctad (ovar 16 faat long, or uta notori of over 10 hp) watercraft atorad at a dock, provided tha watercraft arc owned by tha ownera of tho combined docks. c. Tha axtanalon ahall ba pamltted only during tha 1989 aaaaon. d. Iha axtanalon ahall ba a tanporary, aaaaonal type dock. a Adjacent dock uaa area ahall not ba encroached. Dock mat Mlntaln raqulrad alda aatback (10 faat for flrat 50 feat, 15 '“J 50 faat, 20 faat ovar 100 faat) fron the axtandad P"P"‘5^ tha dock or watercraft, without written parnlaalon of tha neighbor involved. f. gubjact to Inapactlon by the Hennepin County 8herlffa Hater Patrol to eeeure no hesard to navigation exlete. g. Apply rad r.fl.ctlv. Mtarlal to and and all aide, of dock whan ax tandad bayond 100 faat In open watar. 2 Baaldantlal dock. In raatrlctad channel. *111 contlnu. to y.qulr. axt.n- alon perailt* to aaaura Interferanca with navigation la avoided. Adopted by tha LMCD Board of Director, thl. 26th day of May, 1989 ✓</5oEllen L. Hurr» Chair LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT NEWS RELEASE Jm 10^ IW Contact:Gtn* Strowtn M73-7033 SUBJEa:Initial Schedult Announcad on Eurasian Vatar fUlfoil lilaad Harvasting Tha first two waaks of Eurasian watar ailfoil waad harvasting hava baan sat according to Task Forca Chairparson Tom Raasai Hound* This initial schadula will ba us%d as a guida for foracasting tha raaaindar of tha sunaiar progran* "Sinca tha aquipmant capability and axtant of tha waad dansity ara intar^alatadi wa want to gat at laast two waaks of axperianca befora wa projact tha antira suaaar-i" Raasa addad* "Onca wa can varify how many acras par day aach aachina can cut<i wa can than battar projact our bay-by-bay schadula'i” ha concludad- Tha first full waak of cutting is now schadulad to start June That bagins aftar two days of plarmad training onca tha harvestars ara launchai* Tha aquipnant is axpactad to arriva tha waak of Juna 1*11 tha mid-waak being tha likely arrival tine* The waad harvasting s<.nedula projected for the first two weeks beginning Honday^ Juna is as follows: June 2b-27 East Upper Lake in the vicinity of Shadyi Spray and Goose Island - 30 July 3 S 5 "7 — Phelps Bay Uest Upper Lake Cook's and Priest's Bays Lafayette Bay S Tanager Lake Brown's Bay All harvesting will take place in the open water beyond the docks* The areas initially selected are aiiiong those where the weed growth is most advanced at this timei and boat traffic is significant in the areas- It was interesting to note in the schedule planning that the Eurasian water milfoil is several weeks to a month behind its normal growth pattern« particularly compared to 1H6A- A number of reports of weeds on the lake surface have proven to be curly leaf pondweed which dominates in June and then recedes as its cycle is complete by the end of the month- The LHCD and its participating agencies thanks everyone for their support and encouragement as the program reaches its auspicious start on Lake Minnetonka / / / LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 402 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPtKDNE 612/473*7033 ■UOSNS n. STMMNNMN. EXECUTIVE OIRECTOn Jun« U, 1989 L. Hurr. Cttaif Vic* CiMir Mound JM« mt Mlnmaonta Eooc ti Mark MMIIwnd. ItaMuror M mv M Blodin Tbo*i* E*V OawM Cochran Oraananod Alban O Foaiar Uaaphawan Jamaa R. Oramwol Eiic aiaior Ron ICraamar Spring Park John Laarman John O. MaHnka Vidona Robon K. Pikabury Mtnnaionka Roban E. Stooum WbodMnd City of Orooo c/o Mark BornhardsoiiiAdB. P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay» MN 55323 Baar Mark* Va ara plaasad to report tha conplata participation of avary saabar city of tha LHCD in tha 1989 Eurasian Water Milfoil %/aad harvesting project. Total city invastaants is $82,853. Tha invastaants froa individuals including pledges is $160,300 in addition to tha city invastaants. You ara of course aware of our aajor investors providing tha additional $500,000 toward purchase of tha weed harvesting aquipaant. Tha first of four weed harvesters is now due to arrive aidwaak tha weak of June 19. Wa will be advising all cities of tha launch data so you can be present for tha inauguration of this auspicious prograa. Tha weed harvesting contractor. Atlas Marina of Spring Park, is prepared to undertake tha challenges of this 500-acre plus prograa which is being closely coordinated with tha Minnesota Dapartaant of Natural Resources. Wa can coafortably say tha DNR is working with us to cooperatively extend tha acreage as tha need and our cutting axparianca presents itself as tha cutting season progresses. At this time wa respectfully request your payaent to your pledge conaitownt in the aaount of $15,000. Chair JoRllen Hurr, Task Force Chair Toa Reese, and the entire LMCD Board and Lake users everywhere join in thanking you for your conaitaenc to this Lake iaproveaent prograa. You have indeed helped *'Save the Lake.” Sincerely, LAKE NINIIBTOIIKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT ItroBHen Executive Director ERStJla m'l