Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
05-22-1998 Council Packet
PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO Of MEETING DATE^J^|^2i^^£^ PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 1.)UJ Sjf^A S //^/3JJ^ 2.A../ J r iJ99 r/ii^^r,ii y/ —(,----------------------------------- ^fl n n 4.ly. Ka9^ 1 BjV |J_^ _ U^AU/yl+A 3 R hi) fjl fM A.tv iL-^7cso Pjuii,idfi}i?t)oA.uu,uu ------•#/5 1 6 . On £7 r"Ci2U'i>rA) (?( 7.^Tfi/(T fPcAi/M. 0 a7i<ott:Att,un.o t_.L. A /f{A^ (£^/^KS' 6:>''”Aa^'^ 1 ‘^ 9.YfliOA-C-Jt\^V;\\J . OA<. -ki \°\ 10 .p(^V 11.A 12./ y * 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. IP. 19. 20. AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, MAY 22, 1989, 7:00 P.M. Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held request. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items available in the Public Packet which may be obtained request from the Recorder. upon are upon ROLL CALL 1. CONSENT AGENDA* APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 2. Regular Meeting of May 8, 1989 * 3. Board of Review Meeting of May 11, 1989 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT - JoEllen Hurr Rep. PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT **APPLICANTS** Immediately after the Council has reviewed your application please sign the three (3) original resolution copies. 4. 5. 6. 7. #1396 Minnetonka Boat Works, 1449 Shoreline Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Resolution {1336 Sidney Rebers Road Name Request Accessory Structure Ordinance Amendment Drive ENGINEER'S REPORT 8. Lift Station #10/43 - Bid Award 9. Utilities Highway 12 - Bids and Specifications MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT 10. City Administrator's Evaluation and Contract * 11. West Hennepin Human Services * 12. Wayzata Community Education Representative CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 13. Stubbs Bay Sewer Facility Site Analysis Telephone System - Request for Proposal 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. Police Supervisory Implementation Accessory Structure Moratorium Livingston Avenue Drainage Planning Commission/Council Joint Meeting Navarre Board of Review Rer-onvene Meeting - May 24, 1989, 7:00 P.M. Administrator's Inljrmation Highway 12 - Safety Improvement 1972 Shadywood Road Spring Managers Conference Highwood Storm Sewer Ferndale Marsh Fire Camp Teko Spring Clean Up Metro Waste/Weekend Construction 4460 North Shore Drive AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, MAY 22, 1989, 7:00 P.M. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT LICENSES (23*) SILLS (24*) ADJOORIOaSMT MINUTES OP THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 8, 1989 ATTENDANCE 7:00 P.N. The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Grabek, CounciImembers Goetten, Nettlesr Peterson and Callahan. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Bernhardsonr Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusthr Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron, City Attorney Barrett, and City Recorder Scheff ler. CONSENT AGENDA* City Administrator Bernhardson requested the removal of Consent Item #32; CounciImember; CounciImember Peterson requested that item #26 be removed. It was moved by CounciImember Goetten, seconded by Councilmerober Nettles, to approve the Consent Agenda with the exception of Items #26 and #32, which were removed and discussed in the order they appear on the agenda. Motion, Ayes«5, Nays«0, Motion passed. PRESENTATION OF AWARD-WESTONKA SENIORS Ms. Cathy Bailey was present, as was Ms. Dotty O'Brien and Mr. and Mrs. Paul Rauschendorfer. The Westonka Senior Community Services Program had received recognition for achievements on behalf of their volunteers who worked 17,200 hours. The City of Orono received recognition for supporting the Senior Outreach Program. Ms. Bailey then distributed a pamphlet explaining the Westonka Senior Center Foundation. The foundation is being set up for future generations and is a unique program in Minnesota. The fund drive has been very successful. APPROVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by CounclImember Goetten, seconded by CounclImember Nettles, to approve the Minutes of the April 24, 1989 Regular Council Meeting. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays*0, Motion passed. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS* Park Commission Representative, Alexander Vongries, was present and summarized the results of the Park Survey distributed to Orono residents. City Administrator Bernhardson commended Mr. Bradley and Dr. Vongries for their efforts in compiling and tallying the surveys. Mayor Grabek suggested that perhaps Orono could put tog^**her a map depicting the recreational facilities available in Ore PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Planning Commission Representative, present, but had no comments at this time. James Hanson, was MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 8, 1989 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: #990 WARD FERRELL 3411 WATERTOWN ROAD VARIANCES RESOLUTION OF DENIAL #2637 Mr. Jim MacKinnon, Mr. Ferrell's Attorney, was present on Mr. Ferrell's behalf. City Administrator Bernhardson provided a brief history of this application. The application was conceptually denied at the April 24, 1989 Council meeting and the Resolution was now being brought forward. There are two options for consideration, one of which would deny the variances for construction on either of the lots, and the option of waiving the six month delay to allow Mr. Ferrell to make a new variance application. Mr. MacKinnon said that his clients wished to work something out as expeditiously as possible. He said that the Ferrells would be willing to combine Lots 2 and 3 into one lot, 1.89 acres in size. CounciImember Goetten said that she had always been willing to approve one additional building lot. She said however, that she did not want to ever see more than one additional house built on that property. City Administrator Bernhardson informed the Council that splitting the 4 lots into 2 lots, equally sized, would be the best from a septic system standpoint. However, there would be less of a zoning precedent set by combining the two westerly lots. Gaffron expressed staff's preference that a new application be filed with a full Planning Commission review, regardless of which option is requested. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Goetten, to approve Resolution #2637 with option 2, allowing the applicant to determine which variance he preferred to bring before the Planning Commission. Motion, Ayes»5, NayssQ, Motion passed. #1135 ROBERT HANNING 4220 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH REQUEST TO EXTEND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Mrs. Hanning was present for this matter. Jity Administrator Bernhardson informed the Council tnat the Hannings had received a conditional use permit to build a berm to the side and in front of their residence. The Hannings had difficulty obtaining fill and the project was not completed. The conditional use permit will expire June 1, 1939. There is a MINUTES OP ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 8, 1989 ZONING PILE #1135-HANNING CONTINUED letter of credit securing the completion of the project. Concern had been expressed regarding the type of fill being used by the Hannings and Bernhardson suggested that issue be addressed if an extension is approved. Mrs. Hanning provided a brief hir -y of the project and explained the problems involved with oL ning clean fill. She said it is difficult to obtain the quantity of dirt they required all at one time and they did not want it delivered piecemeal. She said that she wanted an extension to September 1, 1989 to complete the berm. It was moved by Mayor Crabek, seconded by CounciImember Peterson/ to extend the conditional use permit for the Hannings to September 1, 1989/ subject to the staff's conditions for approval. Motion/ Ayes*5/ Nays»0, Motion passed. #1261 JOE AND SANDY RAUSCHENDORFER 3895 SHORELINE DRIVE VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2628 Mr. Rauschendorfer was present for this matter. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that the Rauschendorfer's were requesting a slight revision to the conditions conceptually approved. They are requesting that removal of the sidewalk to the lake occur at the same time the foundation work occurs. If approved/ the Resolution would be revised to reflect that the sidewalk be removed prior to the footing inspection being done. Gaffron that it may be necessary to raise the low area between the house and the roadway to direct drainage away from the house. Gaffron further mentioned that due to the house being raised 4* the Rauschendorfers' intend to omit the basement access and put in a first-story walkway and stairway. It was moved by Mayor Grabek/ seconded by Councilmembtr Nettles/ to adopt Resolution #2628/ approving the variances as set forth therein with the slight revision as requested by applicants. Motion/ Ayes«5/ Nays*0/ Motion passed. #1367 STEVEN HARRIS 3850 NATERTOffN ROAD CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT RESOLUTION #2629 Mr. Harris was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that Mr. Harris was seeking a conditional use permit to construct a decorative pond in a pasture area. Mr. Harris intends to construct a fence to keep his horses out of the area. The Resolution addresses certain requirements for the applicant should he encounter drain tile while constructing his pond. MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 8, 1989 ZONING FILE #1367-HARRIS CONTINUED It was moved by CounciImember Goetten, seconded by CounciImember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2629, api jving the Conditional Use Permit for Steven Harris, per the recommendations and conditions set forth therein. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=0, Motion passed. #1375 DAVID PRICE 2914 CASCO POINT ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2630 City Administrator Bernhardson explained that Mr. Price was seeking variances to construct an addition to his principal residence. Although there will be a reduction, hardcover will still exceed 25% in the 75-250* zone. An average lakeshore setback variance is also required and there have been no objections expressed by the affected property owner. The applicant revised his proposal to include the removal of a portion of the existing patio. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Nettles, to adopt Resolution #2630, approving the hardcover and average lakeshore setback variances to construct an addition. Motion, Ayes»5, Nays»0, Motion passed. #1388 CHARLES BERTELSON 760 TONKAWA ROAD VARIANCE Mr. Bertelson was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson informed the Council that Mr. Bertelson wished to construct a two-story garage. The structure would exceed 1,000 s.f., and would therefore require a variance. The Planning Commission had recommended denial. Gaffron noted that should Council deny this application, the applicant could opt to construct two separate structures, and would not exceed hardcover standards with such an option. Gaffron said considerations should be given to the relative visual intensification within the neighborhood of two structures versus one. Mr. Bertelson expressed his preference for building only one structure rather than two. Mr. Bertelson received a letter from his neighbor indicating his preference to see only one additional structure. CounciImember Callahan questioned whether Mr. Bertelson’s woodworking was a business or a hobby? Mr. Bertelson replied that it was only a hobby. Callahan noted that an amendment relating to accessory structures was forthcoming. He asked whether it would be possible to put a moratorium on accessory structures until the amendment was approved? It was moved by CounciImember Callahan, seconded by CounciImember Goetten, to place a moratorium on accessory MINUTES OP ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 8, 1989 ZONING FILE #1388>BERTELSON CONTINUED structures until the Council has had an opportunity to consider the amendment, not to exceed three months. CounciImember Goetten asked whether the Council could legally place a moratorium on building accessory structures. City Attorney Barrett, said that the Council had a right to pass an ordinance imposing a moratorium, except in cases where preliminary approval of a subdivision had been given. CounciImember Callahan amended hie motion to pass an ordinance to place a moratorium on building accessory structures. CounciImember Goetten seconded. Gaffron informed the Council that Mr. Bertelson's accessory structure wo’ild fall within the limitations of the amendment as it is currently drafter. As long as Mr. Bertelson meets the hardcover standards, under the amended ordinance, a variance will not be required. Callahan indicated that he would prefer to review the ordinance amendment. Planning Commission Representative Hanson said that the Planning Commission had been concerned about the hardcover issue should there be a future request to expand the residence. Bernhardson suggested that the moratorium apply to accessory structures in excess of 500 s.f. Notion, Ayes^S, Nays~0, Motion passed. «1389 JAMES/CHARLENE MARDOCK 68C DAKOTA AVENUE AinPH-THE-FACT VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2631 Mr. Mardock was present fer this matter. Planning Commission Representative Hanson stated that he is a neighbor of the Mardocks. He confirmed that the existing deck is located and configured approximately the same as the pre existing deck. Mr. Mardock said that the house was built close to the lot line. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron clarified that the codes had been revised since the time the Mardock*s residence was built. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Nettles, to adopt Resolution #2631, approving the after-the-fact rear yard setback variance. Motion, Ayes«5, Nays=0, Motion passed. #1392 KIM EDWARDS 2450 NOODHAVEN DRIVE AFTER-THE-FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION #2632 Mr. Edwards was present for this matter. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron depicted the area to the east of the house where fill had been placed. The fill has overflowed onto the adjacent property and the City Engineer has recommended that the fill be pulled back. The City Engineer is also recommending that there be no fill placed in the drainage area to the rear of the lot. The Planning Comroissif^n MINUTES OP OROMO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 8, 1989 ZONING PILE «1392-BDHARDS CONTINUED recommended approval of this application with a condition that 20 6* pine trees ‘e planted. The applicant is requesting reconsideratlo • that condition, as is an adjacent property owner who subml a letter to the City. Gaffron said that the estimated cost c trees would be $6,000.00. CounclImember oetten stated that she had been present for the Planning Commission review. It was her opinion that the requirement for 20 6* pine tre was a bit excessive. She said she would be in favor of allow Mr. Edwards to work with staff to achieve a mutually agreeable amount of planting. Councilmember Settles concurred. Another neighbor of Mr. Edwards' was present and stated that it was the general concensus ofthe neighborhood that asking Mr. Edwards to plant 20 6' pines was unnecessary. Councilmember Callahan questioned how long the filling had been occurring? Mr. Edwards said that nine years ago he was working for the company that constructed the house, and fill was brought in at that time. Callahan asked how many feet the elevation had been raised? Mr. Edwards replied that it had been raised 3* - 4*. Callahan questioned why the City was not aware that filling was being done? Gaffron responded that a certain amount of filling was required around the house. There were no complaints issued to the City regarding the fill brought in after that. Mabusth added that in addition to backfilling around the house, it was necessary to protect the septic system with a berm. She said, however, she could not account for the fill to the east side of the house. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2632, with the omission of paragarph 7, and conditioned upon Mr. Edwards working with the City ith regard to suitable plantings. Motion, Ayes»5, Nays«0, Motion passed. #1394 JACKSON WILSON 3059 FARVIEW AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE The applicant was not present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson^ explained that Council recently approved an €unendment of the original drainage easement line. Since that time, an addition was put on the house and a recent survey indicates that the addition encroaches into the wetland setback area. This discrepancy clouds the Wilson's title to the property, which they are in the process of selling. Councilmember Callahan questioned what brought this problem to staff's attention? Zoning Administrator Mabusth replied that it was brought to her attention when the new owners came forth with title problems. The survey provided at the time the addition permit was applied for showed the 930' elevation, but did not show the drainage easement. MIHUTES OP ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 8, 1939 ZONING PILE #1394-WILSON CONTINUED CounciImember Goetten questioned whether staff was at fault for this discrepancy. Mabusth said it is difficult to know what took place 10 years ago. It was moved by Councilmember Goeuten, seconded by Mayor Grabek. to adopt Resolution #2633/ approving the after-the-fact varianct for Jackson Wilson, 3059 Farview Lane. Motion, Ayes»5, Nays»0, Motion passed. #1395 THOM^ WILLIAMS 4127 OAK STREET VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2634 Hr. Williams was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson informed the Council that this item involved the renewal of lot area and lot width variances for a substandard lot. This matter was placed on the consent agenda for the Planning Commission Meeting, however, Mr. and Mrs. Holland, neighboring property owners, expressed concerns regarding drainage from this property and an accessory structure being built on the outlet. Mr. Rolland said he had spoken with Mr. Williams regarding the maintenance of Oak Street. Mr. Rolland said that Mr. Williams had indicated that he would be willing to contribute to maintenance costs. Mr. Rolland felt that the proposed resolution adequately addressed his concerns. Mr. Rolland further expressed concerns about the development of a lot bordering on Linden Lane. He said the owner had been renewing variances over and over again. He said that development of the Linden Lc*ne lot may create additional runoff and could pose a problem. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that the resolution had been amended to address the drainage concerns. Mr. Rolland asked whether the proposed moratorium on accessory structures would apply to this property? Mrs. Susan Dailey stated that it was her understanding that there would be no accessory structure. Mabusth clarified that there was not any specific proposal for the construction of an accessory structure. Mr. Holland's question pertained to notifying the future piroperty owner of the City's ordinance amendment. Mabusth said that the resolution requires the future property owner to do a special lot combination in order to build on the outlet. Councilmember Goetten commented that the drainage in that area has always been a concern of the City. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to approve the renewal variance for Thomas Williams, 4127 Oak Street, including the recommendations for drainage. Motion, Ayes«5, Nays»0, Motion passed. HINDTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MhY 8, 1989 #1396 MINNETONKA BOAT WORKS 1449 SHORELINE DRIVE CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT-VARIANCE Ms. Beth Whittaker was present as a representative of Minnetonka Beat Works, and the Owner of Minnetonka Boat Works, Mr. Irwin Jacobs, was also present. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that this application involved the addition of 48 boat slips, 6 on Browns Bay and 42 on Tanager Lake. There will also be a need to add 26 parking stalls, on the Browns Bay side of Shoreline Drive, and a treatment facility for runoff from the parking area. The LMCD tabled this application due to a need to reconsider the amenities being offered. The amenities are being provided at the Wayzata location, rather than Orono. The current boat density of this marina is 1:49. The City has jurisdiction to control dockage, however there are no current standards to regulate dockage. The application involves a conditional use permit and variances. Mr. Jacobs said that this marina has been an eyesore for the 17 years he has resided in the Tanager Lake area. He said controlling the fishing occurring along Shoreline Drive on his private property has been impossible. Re said that Minnetonka Boat Works prides itself in its efforts to properly maintain and police the marinas, however the maintenance of this property is not possible unless it is fenced-off. Mr. Jacobs next addressed safety and amenities. He said in order to eliminate the need for boaters to haul items across the road, a loading dock will be provided on the Brown's Bay side. The amenities being proposed are; A slip for the Water Patrol, a charter boat for non-profit organizations, installation of a public telephone, additional restroom, the ponding and skimming basin, additional landscaping, the use of the Minnetonka Boat Works facility for supporting fire deparment/emergency use. Mr. Jacobs said that he wanted the Minnetonka Boat Works to set the standard for the other marinas in the area. Mayor Grabek questioned the proposal for the fence. Mr. Jacobs replied that he had no specific plan. He added that it was necessary if the shoreline fishing is to be eliminated. Mabusth informed Mr. Jacobs that variance approval would be necessary to Install a fence in that area. Mr. Jacobs said that the fence was optional, if necessary, there could be more petroling of the area. City Administrator Bernhardson said that the cross walk was another issue. During the Windward Marina application, a cross walk was approved to serve both Marines. There has been confusion as to whether the City or County should put in the cross-walk. Bernhardson said that the cross-walk would be a painted area, but the County would not allow a red signal light. Councilmember Goetten said that she was amazed that a serious accident had not occurred in that area. Mr. Jacobs said that he NmUTBS OP ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 8, 1989 ZONING FILE «1396-MINNBTONKA BOAT WORKS CONTINUED agreed a cross-walk was necessary and he would participate in its installation. CounciImember Goetten said that she was concerned about the boat slips proposed near the channel. Ms. Whittaker said that those docks will be angled out in such a way that boaters would have to back out in the other direction. Goetten also expressed her concern about the increase in hardcover resulting from the additional parking. Mr. Jacobs replied that the trees being removed were either dead or in poor condition and they would be replaced with something more aesthetically pleasing. CounciImember Goetten said that she wanted to see increased police coverage along that stretch of Shoreline Drive to control speed limits. Mabusth suggested that the City work with the County with regard to the cross-walk. Mr. Jacobs reiterated his willingness to work to alleviate any safety problems. Ms. Whittaker added that portable toilets would be placed on the Tanager Lake side of the road, which would reduce the number of road crossings. Ms. Whittaker also noted that the entrance to the Marina is located very close to the property line and that this would help to funnel persons to the cross-walk area. CounciImember Callahan expressed his skepticism about a painted cross-walk slowing traffic speeds. Mr. Jacobs disagreed, stating that in time traffic would slow down and drivers will abide by the cross-walk. CounciImember Nettles questioned whose responsibility it was to clean up the shoreline. Mabusth replied that it would be up to the City to ensure the property owner maintained the property. Nettles opined that he did not believe that increasing the usage and consequently the traffic in that area, would best serve the City of Orono. He preferred to keep the use limited and avoid the need for a cross-walks and increased patrols. Mr. Jacobs said that the problems already exist, it would be up to him to protect the boat owners. Ms. Whittaker noted that Minnetonka Boat Works employs a security firm to patrol both the Wayzata and Orono locations. Mr. Jacobs added that only boat owners could access the property by use of a card or key. Mayor Grabek said that it was going to be a matter of "give and take". He said that he did not believe in overdevelopment of marinas, but he was in favor of improving the appearance of that area while providing access to Lake Minnetonka. He believed that Mr. Jacobs had the capability to do that. Mr. Jacobs reminded the Council that he owns 50 acres of land on Tanager Lake and that he lives in that ar<>a. Ms. Whittaker asked if the issue of paving the parking area could be discussed. Mr. Jacobs said that the boats would sink into the blacktop and it would need to be replaced frequently. Ms. Whittaker said that the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District had approved their ^'roposal without requesting paving. Mabusth stated that the County has requested that the accesses to the MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 8, 1989 ZONING PILE #1396-MINNBTONKA BOAT WORKS CONTINUED parking areas be paved. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounclImember Peterson, to minimize signage and painting of the the road by having fencing on the east side of the road. Fencing in any other location will require approval from the Council. Paving of the parking area is not necessary, as long as staff recommendations are followed. Mayor Grabek directed staff to prepare the resolution for the May 22, 1989 Council Meeting. CounciImember Callahan questioned what authority the City of Orono has over docks. City Attorney Barrett responded that the City currently had no jurisdiction over docks. CounciImember Callahan said that he shared Councilmember Nettles' concerns. Callahan questioned why the area could not be cleaned up and controlled without adding boat slips. Councilmember Goetten stated that years ago a request such as this would have never been approved. She said that she was in favor of working with the applicant, but felt that this application was a bit too ambitious. Goetten said that it was her understanding that the LMCD had not made a final determination on this request. Ms. Whittaker responded that the LMCD wanted to see the amenities split between Wayzata and Orono and that the matter was being referred back to the Water Structures Committee. Mayor Grabek said that in order to encourage property owners to clean up these areas, tif«r City had to be flexible. Goetten said that she was very concealed about the traffic in that area. She suggested having Ch^ef Kilbo's input on this matter. Mayor Grabek commented that to date, no one has been able to control the fishermen in that area. Councilmember Goetten said that she would vote in favor of this application, provided that she be given time to discuss her concerns with Chief Kilbo. Mabusth suggested that Goetten also talk with Mr. Matsumoto, Traffic Operations Engineer with Hennepin County. Motion, Ayes«4, Mettles Nay, Motion passed. #1398 STEVE HOWELLS 1448 PARK DRIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION #2635 Mr. Howells was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the Howells were seeking approval of a conditional use permit to construct a fence. The fence would be 6' high along County Road 19 and 4' high as the fence heads back into the property toward the house. Councilmember Goetten asked why the applicant's daughter could climb over a 3-1/2' fence, but not a 4' fence? Mr. Howells stated ''"fit they would prefer to have the fence 5' along the sides, rati.ar than 4'. Goetten asked Mr. Howells if 6' would not be more desireable? Mayor Grabek questioned whether approving a 6' fence along County Road 19 would be precedent setting? Gaffron replied that MINUTBS OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 8, 1989 ZONING PILE #1398-HOWELLS CONTINUED the Howells* property was unique because all three sides bordered on roadways, Mr. Howells stated that the fence would not create any sight distance problems. Gaffron added that the City Engineer has confirmed that fact. Mr. Howells also noted that they have a blind daughter. It was moved by CounciImember Goetten, seconded by CounciImember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2635, approving the Conditional Use Permit for the Howells at 1448 ParV Drive, with the amendment that the fence be 5* high along the sides, rather than 4*. Motion, Ayes»5, Nays=0, Motion passed. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE 67, SECOND SERIES SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION* It was moved by CounciImember Goetten, seconded by CounciImember Nettles, to adopt Attachment A as a summary ordinance for publication for the recent changes for the zoning code. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays^O, Motion passed. MAYOR'S REPORT: CITY ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AMD CONTRACT Mayor Grabek distributed a memo and evaluation sheet to the Council asking them to complete and return it so the matter may discussed at the May 22, 1989 Council Meeting. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Nettles, to table this matter until the May 22, 1989 Council Meeting. Motion, Ayes*5, Nays*0, Motion passed. DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT City Administr \tor Bernhardson explained that the Development Committee was required to review minor changes and building permits for the Planned Unit Development. Bernhardson recommended that the Building and Zoning Administrator, City Engineer and Public Works Director be appointed to the Committee. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Peterson, that the Public Works Director, City Engineer and Building and Zoning Administrator compose the Development Committee and that these be placed on the annual resolution of appointment at the beginning of the year. CounciImember Callahan questioned what duties the Development Committee* would have? Bernhardson explained that the Committee would review minor deviations from the standards required under the Planned Unit Development. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays*0, Motion passed. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: FACILITY SITE ANALYSIS City Administrator Bernhardson referred to information comparing the ccsts of the three sites. He said that the significant cost for site B, is the need to install a 12" well to support a 1000 gal/min sprinkler system for each bulling. The MINUTES OP ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 8, 1989 FACILITY SITE ANALYSIS CONTINUED sewer pond site would only require one well to support sprinkler systems for both buildings. Site C will require significant costs for soil correction. Fcr sites A and B, there would be no cost for the land/ there would be for site C. At this time/ a specific purchase price for site C has net been determined. The sale price of the land upon which the current facility is located and the sewer pond site has not yet been determined. Bernhardson noted that there would be additional costs if the current site and sewer pond were used. The public works building would have to be constructed prior to elimination of the existing buildings. By doing so, there may be a delay in construction/ and consequently an increase in construction costs. There was also a cc. ” arison given as to the cost/ft. quality of construction. A low quality classification would be approximately $65.00/sq. ft./ an average quality would be about $75.00/sq. ft. A listing showing the cost/sq. ft. of other city facilities was provided to help with the comparison. CounciImember Goetten said she would like to look at other city facilities that were in a more residential setting. Mayor Grabek questioned whether the selling and purchasing prices of the land Involved could be discussed in executive session? City Attorney Barrett replied that under the open meeting law/ any discussions regarding bidding preparations for land could be discussed in executive session. Councilmember Callahan questioned what specific utilities the costs Indicated would cover. Bernhardson said the costs would be for sewer/ well drilling/ and the pumps needed for the well. Callahan briefly expressed his viewpoints concerning the various options available for locating the new facilities. He suggested that should the Public Works facility be located on Highway 12/ it may not be necessary to incur $160/000 for soil corrections. He said that he would like to have cost information in that regard. LONG LAKE FIRE-EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION City Administrator Bernhardson informed the Council that the City of Long Lake had an opportunity to purchase a boat at a discount. The boat will be used to provide fire and other emergency services. The boat was not a budgeted item and the City of Long Lake is requesting a $2/500.00 donation from the City of Orono. This would include $900.00 toward the boat/ and an additional $1600.00 toward the purchase of a pump and other boat accessories. Councilmember Goetten questioned why Long Lake had not approached Orono prior to the purchase. Bernhardson said that the boat wa^ a posr-budget item/ and in his opinion/ Long Lake had hoped to receive donations to cover tne entire cost.. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten/ seconded by Mayor MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 8, 1989 LONG LAKE EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION CONTINUED Grabek, to approve the $900.00 contribution to the City of Long Lake for the reimbursement of the Relief Association for the acquisition of a boat and $1,600.00 for the acquisition of the necessary equipment. Motion, Ayes^s, Nays«0, Motion passed. BOARD OF REVIEW, MAY 11, 1989 City Administrator Bernhardson reminded the Council that the Board of Review was scheduled for Kay 11, 1989. In order to handle the expected overflow, the Board of Review will reconvene Wednesday, May 24th. This being an informational item, there was no motion. FACSIMILE MACHINE City Administrator Bernhardson reported that the City was requesting approal to purchase a facsimile machine for approximately $1,000.00. There have been requests from outside entities, as well as the City Engineer and City Attorney, to have the ability to receive material via facsimile machine. CounciImember Peterson questioned whether cost~consciousness was the reason for selecting the machine indicated? Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that the requested machine would adequately serve the needs of the City for now; the next step up would be $2,000.00 to $3,000.00. It was the general concensus of the Council and Mayor Grabek that the City should invest in a machine that would fulfill its needs presently and in the future. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Nettles, to approve the expenditure of a Facsimile Machine that will adequately meet the needs of the City. Motion, Ayes»5, Nays«0, Motion passed. 1972 SHADYWOOD ROAD City Administrator Bernhardson updated the Council regarding the situation at 1972 Shadywood Road. The City is following its regular procedure for dealing with the cars and is working with the neighbors to curtail the duck feeding. This being an informational item, there was no motion. LORD FLETCHERS-SPRING PARK NEET'ING* It was moved bv CounclImember Goetten, seconded by Counci Imember Nettles, t.r' »*jcept the Information regarding Lord Fletchers and commend Spring Park for working through and taking the initiative on a difficult situation. Motion, Ayes*5, Nays*0, Motion passed. POLICE SUPERVISORY IMPLEMENTATION CounciImember Peterson questioned why there was a delay in bringing this matter back before the Council. Peterson also asked whether the quarterly evaluation report was a new item? Bernhardson said that up until now, only an annual report had been done, but that quarterly evaluations would be done from now MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD nAY 8, 1989 POLICE SUPERVISORY IMPLEMENTATION CONTINUED on. Lieutenant Cheswick has attenc’ed evaluation classes and has a form he feels will be an improvement from what is currently being used. Councilmem>ber Goetten questioned when the Council may expect to see the information regarding the additional lieutenant. Bernhardson said he would talk with Chief Kilbo to see if the information could be presented at the Nay 22, 1989 Council Meeting. It was moved by CounciImember Peterson, seconded by Mayor Grabek, to table this item until the May 22, 1989 Council Meeting. Motion, Ayes«5, Nays«0, Motion passed. POLICY AUCTION-RBSCHEDULB DATE* It was moved by CounciImember Goetten, seconded by CounciImember Mettles, to approve the disposal of unclaimed, confiscated and obsolete property at auction to be held Saturday, June 10, 1989. Motion, Ayes»5, Nays«0, Motion passed. TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT-ORONO GOLF COURSE* It was moved by CounciImember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to employ Steve Boylan effective 5/9/89 and Robert Braun effective 5/2/89, as tempora y counter helpers at the hourly rates of $4.75 and $4.50, respectively. Employment is not expected to continue for a period longer than six consecutive months. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays*0, Motion passed. REQUEST AUTHORITY TO HIRE C.S.O.-PART-TIME* It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to authorize the hiring of Mr. Troy Denneson as a part-time C.S.O. at $5.10 hourly, commencing immediately, with the annual salary not to exceed $425.00 per month. All expenditures are to be within amounts budgeted for animal control for 1989. Motion, Ayes«5, Nays=0, Motion passed. FEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT-PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE 68, SECOND SERIES* It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to implement the PUD Ordinance Amendment into the 1989 Fee Schedule. Motion, Ayes*5, Nays*0, Motion passed. NO PARKING-RESOLUTION #2636* It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to approve Resolution #2636, authorizing the placement of "No Parking" signes on East Long Lake Road, beginning at the intersection at Old Long Lake Road to a point 800* north. Motion, Ayes^s, NayssO, Motion passed. ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to accept the City Administrator's Information regarding: Highway 12-Safety Improvement; Highway 12 MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 8, 1989 ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION CONTINUED Task Force; Summary of Receipts/Disbursements-March; Lake Minnetonka-Lake Level/Graph; LMCD Shoreland Regulations; City Docks; Recycling; Electronic Deposit; Additional Depository; Kennel License; and Goal Setting Status. Motion, Ayes*5, Nays«0, Motion passed. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: There was no report from City Attorney Barrett. LICENSES It was moved by CounciImember Nettles, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve the following licenses: Residential Kennel:Josh and Pam U an 2705 Watertown Road Garbage Haulers:Woodlake Sanitary Services, Inc. 4000 Hamel Road Westonka Sanitation P. 0. Box 94 Navarre R & W Sanitation, Inc. and R & W Roll-Off Service, Inc. 5525 County Road 50 Carver Redpenning Services 2076 County Road 90 Maple Plain Motion, Ayes»5, Nays-0, Motion passed. Mr. Brian Van Buesekom of Ingleside Engineering & Construction, Inc., was present. He explained that the reason there was incorrect information on their license application was due to a clerical error. One of the secretaries had completed the form and had not completed the form accurately. Mayor Grabek asked Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron about the quality of work provided by Ingleside Engineering & Construction, Inc. Gaffron replied that he could not recommend denial of the license based upon the quality of work. He said there had been two separate incidents involving wells that did not meet State code. The revocation that occurred in Independence was due to working without a permit. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to approve the septic license for Ingleside Engineering. Motion, Ayes»5, NayseQ, Motion passed. NINDTBS OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAT 8, 1989 BILLS* It was moved by CounciImember Nettles# seconded by CounciImember Goetten, to approve payment of the All Funds Accounts. Motion, Ayes«5, Nays=0, Motion passed. EXECUTIVE SESSION - 9s40 P.N. City Attorney Barrett requested an Executive Session. ADJOURNMENT 10:15 P.M. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Nettles, to adjourn the Regular Council Meeting at 10:15 p.m. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=0, Motion passed. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor "7 1989 BOARD OP REVIEW - HAY 11, 1989 The 1989 Board of Review met on Thursday, May 11, 1989. Mayor Grabek called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. CounciImembers Goetten, Peterson and Callahan were present. Councilmember Nettles was absent. Representing the City were John Gerhardson, Acting City Administrator; Teri Naab, Deputy Clerk; Rolf Erickson, City Assessor; Dave Wilde and Rita Guderian Assistant City Assessors. Glenn Busitzky represented Hennepin County Assessor's staff. Mayor Grabek introduced the Assessor and his staff to the audience. A brief synopsis on assessing property was given by Mr. Erickson and then he showed a slide presentation on property taxation. Mayor Grabek called the following persons before the Board in the order of their arrival at the meeting. Mr. Erickson noted that all persons wishing to appeal who had called his office and left a message on his recorder had not been notified by his staff. Those people that were before the Board were to state their name, address and PID; Mr. Erickson would check to make sure they were on his list and he would be in contact with them before the next Board of Review to be held on May 24, 1989. At that time they would be given an opportunity to express their opinions. He noted that there was about 30% more calls this year than last year. He also stated that about 27 letters went out to property owners that the assessors had reviewed within the last two years. These letters stated that the assessors feel the value is correct and t owner should appeal to the Board. Appearing before the Board were: 1. Norman and Dorothy Carlson, 3262 North Shore Drive - PID #08-117-23 41 0008. Christine Brinkley presented a purchase agreement for this property which indicates a much lower value. Mr. Erickson said he would revisit the property. 2. John Burke, 1840 Shadywood Road - PID #17-117-23 24 0016. Mr. Burke noted that his value has gone up 33% from the 1987 valuation. Mr. Erickson noted that he would revisit the property Friday, May 12, 1989 at 9:30 a.m. 3. C.L. Johnson, 2024 Shadywood Road - PID #17-117-23 31 0011. Mr. Johnson indicated that he would like an assessor to go over the records with him. An assessor would be in contact with him. 4. George Swanbeck, 1750 Shadywood Road - PID #17-117-23 21 0021. 5. Marcia Schoeneman, 3332 North Shore Drive - PID #08-117-23 41 0013. 6. Lizabeth Crear, 3701 Shoreline Drive - PID #20-117-23 21 0033. 1989 BOARD OF REVIEW - NAY 11, 1989 7. Richard and Gwen Genari, 1945 Fagerness Point Road - PID #17-117-23 23 0018. Mr. Genari noted that he bought the property in 1987 for $168,000 and the current market value is at $203,000. He feels that he paid a fair price for the property and that the value should be adjusted downward so as not to reflect such a high increase from the original purchase price. Mr. Erickson stated that he would re evaluate the property. 8. Richard W. Brown, 2685 Shadywood Road - PDI #21-117-23 23 0050. Mr. Brown noted that the property is assessed at over 25% from what he paid for it 2 years ago which reflects a $50,000+ increase. Mr. Erickson to revisit. 9. Tom Sarenpa, 1670 Shadywood Road - PID #17-117-23 21 0015. 10. Larry Langhans, 1366 Rest Point Road - PID #07-117-23 32 0060. 11. Robert A. Eberle, 3625 North Shore Drive - PID #08-117-23 34 0009. 12. Norman Oestreich, 0010. 4760 North Arm Drive - PID #06-117-23 23 13. MayBeth Christensen, 3587 North Shore Drive - PID #08-117-23 34 0056. 14. Jerome J. Lague, 2138 Shadywood Road - PID #17-117-23 42 0013. 15. Dean Greimann, 3779 Casco Avenue - PID #20-117-23 31 0011 and 20-117-23 31 0066. 16. Donna J. Hager, 4580 West Branch Road - PID #06-117-23 34 0001. 17. Ronald Glesne, 1470 Cherry Place - PID #08-117-23 33 0017. Mr. Glesne noted that last year his valuation was raised $12,000; this year is was raised $62,100. He feels this is excessive. Mr. Erickson noted that in his area some of the valuations were calculated wrong and he was in the process of correctina the error and a new statement would be sent out to Mr. Gi ' ne and any other properties where the value was calculateu wrong. 18. Kern M. Hoppe, 1150 Wyndmere Road - PID #26-118-23 41 0007. Mr. Hoppe noted that there has been an increase of 25% per year in the past couple of years and feels this is very excessive. Mayor Grabek recommended an assessor should revisit the property. 19. LaDean McWilliams, 1120 Willow Drive South - PID #10-117-23 24 0032. 1989 BOARD OF REVIEW - NAY 11, 1989 20. Gary Everson, 4*755 North Shore Drive - PID #07-117-23 32 0021. 21. Frances D. Setterlund, 4415 North Shore Drive - PID #07-117- 23 43 0017. Mrs. Setterlund noted that her valuation went vp over $12,000 this year and has gone up every year for the past several. She noted that she is on a fixed income as she is 80 years old and finds this increase excessive. Mayor Grabek asked Rita to revisit the property to re evaluate the situation- 22. Gordy Lundm<>n, 4435 North Shore Drive - PID #07-117-23 34 0004. 23. Charles Schoen, 2430 North Shore Drive - PID #09-117-23 41 0006 and 09-117-23 41 0008. Mr. Schoen noted that his valuation went up 20% this year which seems excessive. He also noted that the wooded acreage near his home has always been homesteaded and this year it is non-homestead. Mr. Erickson will check on the situation on this property. 24. Mari Everson, 4755 North Shore Drive - PID #07-117-23 32 0021. Ms. Everson noted that their property has Increased in value 25% and feels that it should have gone down if anything due tc the extensive storm damage done to their property in July 1987. She also stated that she feels, based on her interpretation of State Statutes, that land valuations should at least start at the purchase price and from there go up as necessary. Mr. r^rickson stated that that is not what the law states and indicated he would revisit their property. 25. Chris Lindstrom, 1065 Ferndale Road West - PID #02-117-23 43 0021. Ms. Lindstrom stated that she would like to check on surrounding property values and had gone into City Hall but could only get 1988 value. She wanted to know how she could get what she wanted. Mr. Erickson stated that until the roll has gone to Hennepin County it is not public information. He also noted that when people call his office, they will be given 5 property values. Mr. Wilde stated that he had tried to reach her but her phone was out of order. Ms. Lindstrom noted that their land values are escalating at a high rate and realizes that this has to do with the State Legislature and will be pursuing it further with them. She noted that she saw some properties in the tax book where the land was valued at $300,000 and the house at $1,000; it is an instance of negative valuation on the building, yet the valuation keeps going up because of the land. Ms. Lindstrom stated there is no need to revisit her property, her problem is with the State of Minnesota. 26. A.R. Backstrom, 1973 Fagerness Point Road - PID #18-117-23 14 0003. Mr. Erickson will send someone to revisit the property. 1989 BOARD OF REVIEW - MAY 11, 1989 27. Newell Weed, 1385 Orono Lane - PID #02-117-23 34 0003. Mr. Weed noted that he has introduced an amendment to the Legislature that states that a person (over 55 or over 65 - at their discretion) who has owned and occupied their home for 10 years or more and the valuation has gone up over 3 times the purchase price, the property taxe cannot exceed 6% of the property owners gross Income minus your income taxes paid to the State of Minnesota and the federal tax paid in that year. Mr. Weed would like the Mayor and CounciImembers of Orono to adopt a resolution supporting his eunendment and send it on to the appropriate Representatives, Mr. Weed noted that this amendment only applies to a small number of the people but it prevents senior citizens from loosing their homes because of taxation. Mr. Erickson will coni:*ct Mr. Weed regarding his valuation. 28. Larry Gjtabill, 1350 Rest Point Road - PID #07-117-23 32 0039. The following property owners were unable to attend the Board of Review meeting and submitted letters to the Board members: Bob Lapinski 2948 Casco Point Road 20-117-23 31 0036 Douglas Johnson 1355 Shoreline Dr 02-117-23 34 0012 John Pillsbury 1280 Bracketts Pt Rd 11-117-23 32 0019 Frank Yusup 22'“French Cr Dr 10-117-23 32 0004 John Gabrielson 1065 Tonkawa Rd 08-117-23 13 0001 Thomas Smith 1205 Tonkawa Rd 08-117-23 13 0018 Ronald Potas 17-117-23 31 0012 17-117-23 42 0007 Philip C. Byers 3083 Farview Lane 04-117-23 33 0005 The following person mailed a letter to the City which was copy of the letter was submitted to the assessor. Sandra L. Nunemaker 1305 Spruce Place 07-117-1 0051 It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Goetten, to close the 1989 Board of Review at 8:50 p.m. and reconvene on Wednesday, May 24, 1989 at 7:00 p.m. Ayes 4, nays 0. ATTEST: Jcunes R. Grabek, Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk To: Mayor Grabek & Oiuiio Council Member? City Administrator Bernhardson Proa: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: May 17, 1989 Subject: #1396 Minnetonka Boat Works, 1449 Shoreline Drive - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Resolution The enclosed resolution has been drafted per Council's conceptual direction at the May 8th, 1989 meeting. Please make any additions or amendments as deemed necessary. The final site plan has not been submitted as of this writing and will be attached to this resolution as part of the permanent record. Staff has staked the location of the cross-walk so that Council may evaluate placement and sighting distance from on coming east and west cars. The Police Department conducted a survey of the speeds of west bound and east bound traffic within the subject area on Sunday, May 14, 1989 between the hours of 5 and 7. The total traffic count was 219 vehicles. Please review the enclosed tabulation sheets. The study found that speed limits were within 10 mph ^f the posted limit. A RBSOLUnON GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISIONS 8 AND SECTION 10.41, SUBDIVISION 10 (D) AND PER SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 GRANTS A CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT AMD PER SECTION 10.41, SUBDIVISION 2 APPROVES THE COMMEROTJO. SITE PLAN FOR MINNETONKA jlJAT WORKS PILE #1396 WHEREAS, Genroar Industries, Inc. (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 1449 Shoreline Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Exhibit A attached (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant proposes the expansion of an existing 42 stall parking lot by 26 additional stalls for a total of 68 stalls to support a boat slip expansion of the commercial marina of 48 slips for a total of 114 slips. Such improvement requires approval of a conditional use permit for land alterations in excess of 100 cubic yards and a variance to Sect.ion 10.55, Subdivision 8 for land alterations conducted within the 0-75* lakeshore protected area where none is allowed, and per Section 10.41, Subdivision 10 (D) seeks approval of a hardcover variance within the 0-75* setback area for an increase of 2,219 square feet or 1.7% (total existing « 23,390 s.f. or 14.1%, total proposed » 25,609 s.f. or 15.48%) as a result of the expanded parking area where no hardcover is allowed, and per Section 10.41, Subdivision 2 seeks approval of a commercial site plan for the expanded parking area within the eastern portion of the marina property divided by Hennepin County Road 15. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning Pile #1396. Page 1 of 8 2. The property is located in the B-2 Lakeshore Business Zoning District requiring a lainimum of 2 acres of area. The marina property divided by County Road 15 consists of 1.815 acres within the east portion of the property and 1.35 acres within the west portion of the property for a total of 3.281 acres. 3. The Orono Council reviewed this application on May 8^ 1989, and conceptually approved the proposed variances and conditional use permit based upon one or more of the following findings and hardships: A) The east and west portions of the marina property are not deep enough to allow an expansion of the parking area that would meet the required lakeshore setback. B) The current pattern of docks on the west and east side with parking provided only on the east has existed for this marina for over 40 years without mishap. C) The majority of the property is located within the lakeshore protected area where no hardcover is allowed. D) The property has been used as a commercial marina for over 40 years. E) Based on County and City records there have been no personal injury or property damage resulting from the cross-over use of the clients of either Windward Marine or Minnetonka Boat Works. The accident records of the City from 1985 to the present reveal only 5 accidents. None of these accidents were related to the cross-over activities of the clients of the marina properties. F) Dralnage/run-off will be improved by providing re direction of surface run-off into a retention pond for treatment rather than draining directly into the lake per current pattern of drainage. G) The applicant, represented by Irwin Jacobs, has agreed to work with the City to improve the level of safety for the users of the county road and the marina facilities in the area. The applicant plans to install appropriate "No Trespassing" signage and provide additional personnel to patrol the area. Page 2 of 8 H) The Cl'vY ^»as asked for Increased police supervision In the area to enforce "no parking" along county road. 4. The applicant proposes the removal of 6 mature trees as a result of the expanded parking area within the 0-75* setback area. Per amended Section 10.22, Subdivision 3, the applicant shall apply for a staff permit for tree removal and in addition submit a planting schedule for the required replacement trees. 5. On April 20, 1989, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District granted a permit that would approve the expansion of the parking area and the retention pond with treatment facility for the Minnetonka Boat Works. 6. Glenn Cook, City Engineer, in a report dated April 12, 1989, conceptually approved the proposed drainage plan and ponding area subject to specific modifications in the proposed plan. 7. Wayne A. Matsumoto of the Hennepin County Department of Public Works, in a report dated May 3, 1989, noted the following: A) The County was not aware of an accident problem in this area and recommended approval of a marked cross walk to serve the clients of the marinas. He did not feel the limited number of accidents within this section of County Road 15 would warrant the installation of flashing yellow lights. B) He added that a pedestrian bridge would appear to be out of the question because of the limited land area and land base needed to support the handicapped requirement. C) He also noted that a walk-way under the Tanager Lake Bridge for the clients of the marina may result in a security risk. 8. The City Council has considered this application including the findings of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 3 of 8 9. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 10. The City Council finds that the expansion of the parking area within the lakeshore protected area shall not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants the variances and conditional use permit as set forth above and approves tne commercial site plan date revised __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ by Sathre, Bergquist Inc. and attached to this resolution as Page 8 of 8 for the Minnetonka Boat Works, su bject to the following conditions: 1. Owner to execute a Developer’s Agreement and post a Letter of Credit (150% of cost of required improvements) with the City to ensure the following Improvements are fulfilled upon the installation of the expanded parking area: A) Drainage/surface water treatment improvements per final plans approved by the M.C.W.D. and City of Orono. The City Engineer has requested the following amendments to the drainage plan: i. The parking lot grading plan to be modified to provide a minimum 1% grade. Page 4 of 8 11. The area between the parking lot and the lake should be a minimum of 6" higher than the parking lot. iii. Pre-cast concrete •bumper curbs to be installed around the parking lot. B) Paving of parking lot access from County Road 15. C) Installation of loading dock within east dock section providing safer easy access for clients. D) Planting of replacement trees and shrubs adjacent to dumpster. 2. Applicant to install appropriate "Private Property/No Trespassing" signage within both portions of marina property. Applicant is hereby advised that if fencing is deemed necessary at some future time, that variance approval is required if sections of the fencing are to be located within the 0-75* lakeshore protected area. 3. The City of Orono shall Install a cross-walk as approved by Hennepin County and the Public Works Director of the City of Orono. Applicant shall participate in the shared payment for all costs associated with the installation of cross walk. 4. Final landscape plan shall include a planting schedule for replacement trees and screening of dumpster on the east portion of the property and as shown on attached site plan. 5. The new dock construction shall be subject to the following conditions: A) Access to dock must be maintained every 300*. B) The 20-B; C rating shall be maintained by providing fire extinguishers on each float and one on the pier or warf 25* at the head of the gangway to float, pursuant to Uniform Fire Code Section 79.911 (e). C) All electrical equipment installed and used must be in accordance with the National Electrical Code as it applies to wet, d£unp or hazardous locations. Page 5 of 8 D) All portions of floats exceeding 250’ in distance to ensure fire department access shall be provided with an approved wet standpipe system installed in conformity with Uniform Building Code Section 382 as follows: i. Hose station shall be spaced as to provide protection to any portion of the floats or the floating vessels. ii. Hoses shall be mounted on a reel or rack and enclosed within an approved cabinet Hose station shall be labeled "Fire Hose - Emergency Use Only". iii. All equipment shall meet the approval of the fire inspector. 6. Erosion control shall be employed at all times on the site during the time of the expansion of the parking lot area. 1% Applicant to apply for a building permit for commercial dock construction. 8. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by the application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval or this approval will expire on that date (May 22, 1990). 9. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 10. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of Genmar Industries, it heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 6 of 8 Hay, 1989 ATTEST: Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 22nd day of Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of May, 1989, by James R. Grabek & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City, Notary Public My Commission Expires Page 7 of 8 Resolution No. Exhibit A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of Government Lots 1 and 2, Section 11, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Government Lot 1, thence on an assumed bearing of East along the north line of said Government Lot 1 a distancs of 1125.09 feet to a Government Meander Corner; thence South 10 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 887.66 feet to the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence North 67 degrees 48 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 167 feet to the shore of Lake Minnetonka; thence southerly along the shore of Lake Minnetonka and its southerly extention to an intersection with the centerline of the channel which connects Lake Minnetonka with Tanager Lake; thence westerly along said centerline to an intersection with the southerly extention of the east shore of Tanager Lake; thence northerly along said southerly extention and east shore to an intersection with a line which bears South 67 degrees 48 minutes 00 seconds West from the point of beginning; thence North 67 degrees 48 ninutes 00 seconds East a distance of 127 feet to the point of beginning. Except that part thereof platted as Hennepin County State Aid Plat 51, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Highway No. 15 ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT UHSS KEY _________CONTRCX NUMBER (OCA) ________COST AGENCY NOC IQENiT tCAG>_______ I E , C , 1 I / I4/, / ,^ / I M , N I 0 , 2 , 7 I /,.5^A I LNBR D*te reported iRPOI TIME RPO fTRP'LOCA' !ON GRIND N8R tlGNI ClI / l(^,/TI / , / 1/ !'■=>.CM / I , ,^, Vl II I y?p PEACE COMUnTTED iPlCl ^ LNBR HRO SQUAD OR BADGE #(SBN) TIMEASIG fTAS) TIME ARH fTAR) TIW? CLR fTCLI D/E'/r~T , :g-/, /I//1 /,>i-^,r;i/1 /.9~,c/.o\ I LNBR UOCrri/rg?7i/r~,<y, 4>i/),/?i/m iNBR I]/[M ]/[ ucs CmNSEO ORmTlALCC3MPlAINTD «^FICER PRINCIPAL CODE SiJSPECT SUS VlCTByl VIC ASST REPORT PARTY RP admin ADM OPiTENOER OFF OTHER OTH HRDCodH P Phono R-Rodo A-AUrm l-InPofson V-Visuil M-MoA T-Ofto» OC K* ARREST 2 CfTATONC WARND : ■ ■ -r NAMEtUST FIRST. UOOIE]DOB OTHER REPORTS mClUOEO Impound 'J Prop m¥«nioiy □ knpM Consort □ Aocidort Roport C IrtkMnotRopodG PlnlolO TigsG Convn. VolL R rxv I □ OrtMoighlQ COPYTO. 0 0 0® COATTMYO OTYATTlrtG COURTD CMEFO WPCONSn OISPOSmON: Jpfoungpd CteafgitBr^ffgg''' ReL-QlheT Agwl£^ Ir Iiuyb ...^ Other OFRtCERS '1 C/ SUPERVISOR S SIGNATURE ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT |*SS.«ET ■ COHnWumWEBlOCAl __ CONT ACCNCT NCiC lOtUT ICWI 1 E , C , t I / ^ I I M , N I 0 , 2 , 7 i I LN8R DATE REPORTED (fiPOl ru£RPO(TRP) LOCATION GRIND N8RILGN) [T] / Itf ,5^1 / ,»/ 1^^ / I /,-71^31 / I I , yi II I /t^^n /^jk' A.! /S- PUCE COMMITTEO (PLQ SQUAD OR BADGE »(S8W I____L TIME ASW (TASI O / EZI /1 . , <7 7.^ /1 /, ->,V ijyt/ [ TIME ARR (TARI TIMEClfl rrcL) 1/1 / IN6R ISN UOC UCS IN0R SNri/r~n/r~UOC PRINCIPAL CODE SUSPECT SUS VICTIM VIC ASST REPORT PARTY RP AOMM ADM OFFENDER OFF OTHER OTH OFFENSCa ORMTULCOMFUMra NAME OAST, FnST.MOHE) HROCodn P-PhoTd R-Radk) A-Alarm l-ki Parson V-YittM 113T-oew ARREST □CITATONQ WARND Doa ADDRESS PH(W) COY ST DP PH(R) PC.NAME (UST. FIRST. MCOLE)DOS/SEX ADDRESS PH(W) CITY ST ZP PH(R) PC.NAME(UST,Fnsr,HCDl£)DOer SEX ADDRESS PH,TV) PoSfeA ZIP PH(R) OTHER REPORTS WCIUOEO Impound C PraptnvwdoryG ImplM ConMrt □ AoodMRdportD MUannRaDOrtD Pt«MC TagsQ CamVih RdpoitQ Oi«n«^G RolCMia (y: . /VeUi.^3 l'?------- iP J7 "5”3*? rv,^-lid VpL^.iV V 37 73. •'J Vo ..r 36 ;0 1 V; -n 3 3V 3 So "W V5 ”z.Ho “7 31 "ao i/S ■'3 5?■V/ 31 '•2.9 1 33 '•3^ T-y " 3'C 3/• 3b "31 AV 37 "'hH 3.1 33 "3/33 0 0 00 CO AITfiy CITY \rtm COCRT CHItF \1P CCNS OTh€R 4^01 (ixl DISPOSITION: Unfounded Cea/ed By Anest Pel. Other Aoencv inactive Other OFFICERS SUPERVISOR S SIGNATURE 4> siS'z? -H-fk 7 I ^-Li tttr 1/ I ^30-3 rr i^rni-+HwffH-w- by- 3 7 •=j-Vo i^HtUO ^7 - <j; Ttit 1( •z.-' Vl 11 3 ' 41 HI 21 u s^H, U'l >5 4H+ Ml- i-Ml -a - Y- r iv -xt ■i1 ■?St+t^‘l[------------ 3 / 31 J+4+-#ft--f^'^ \'W 3/ 3i^. '— 37 •W-Hif)i-------— ^^■HtVpl—---------- 2^ U|--------------- '^0 ^11 ____ W II---------------- V2, V3 ay 2.7 33 1^ I 2. 7 6 From: Date: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusthr Building & Zoning Administrator May 17, 1989 Subject: #1336 Sidney Rebers - Road Name Request The developer has provided two names for the City's consideration selecting a road name for the loop road within the Rebers* plat# renauned to Sugar Woods. The road naunes choices are as follows: 1st Choice •• Sugarwood Drive 2nd Choice - Sugarbush Drive The Public Works Director, Police Chief and Zoning Administrator have approved the first choice of Sugarwood Drive, finding no conflict with existing road names within the adjacent surrounding area. PROPOSED MOTION: Approved by _ _, seconded by_ _, to approve Sidney Rebers* request to name the road serving the plat of "Sugar Woods" as Sugarwood Drive finding no conflict with existing roads that serve the City of Orono and surrounding municipalities. Ayes _ _, nays _ _• ”* rn i BRW INC HEW THHESHEP COUARE 700 THIRD STREET SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA 55415 Planning TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING URBAN DESIGN PHONE 612 370-0700 PAX 613 370-i'»:iJ May 10. 1989 Jeanne Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Jeanne, Per your direction, we are submitting our request for approval of the name “SUGARWOOD DRIVE" for the private road in Sid Rebers' PRO. If this street name has been previously assigned, our second choice is "SUGARBUSH DRIVE." I also want to inform you that Sid has decided to name the subdivision "SUGAR WOODS" instead of Meyers Woods. Our forthcomming documents will use this name. We look forward to the May 22 Council meeting for the review of our request. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, BRW, INC. Bob Kost, ASIA BK/jkf AN AfFlLIATE OF THE BENNETT RMGROSE VVOLSFELO JARV iS GARDNER INC GROUP OMOJ BENNETT DONALD W RINGROSE RICHARD P WOLSFELO PETER E JARViS LAWRENCE J GARDNER THOMAS F CARROLL CRA-G A AMUNDSEN DONALD E HUN MARK G SWENSON XXNB MCNAMARA RCHARD 0 PILGRM DALE N BECKMANN DENNIS J SUTLIFF jEFFRE f L BENSON RA lPH C BLUM DAVID L GRAHAM MINNEAPOLIS DENVER PHOENIX TUCSON ST PETERSBURG i«>-i Hi ii:!; ii:. ;ti „1C-51 „5C-0 . 1»-7B rrSS!:iiS«s>r»»'s!§ss^~-r~"lA-32 m ias«sSS i;gS«0«LV0 5T..iSssr-... rxssossgi^s STATl M<irf NO !«• -------s?:;*cr:s;s§;j5 ^ State -<WY NO 1J1 Oth — state NWT NO m rr — SSSrSiU SSSSKSK S= isasKis!;! ^ s;gs;s;ssssNMKr-==ltis HsKSiU K.-=13 Ijma; J. —==il;" »ys:5::;sr, - SSSSKISiS s;k!!§!S!S STATE HWT NO JM BT =1 „20-J« .2000 .3002 .2BOS 40-2A .20-* T SUVNEB^T. MW.------ SUMNCBST h S------- 5UMBTt«*AVE S 8t . SUMTEB AWE N SB -. SUMTIB AVE N CN -- sumteb awe N OV sumteb av E n nh . sumteb awe S OV .. SUMTEB AWE 5 SI - - SUMTEBCiB N BB - SUMTEB cm N ON ._ SUMTEB UA BT.-------- SUMTEB PU NM _ SUM BO ED ITEB 11 BMW ---------------SUNTEB w»8C-.------ SUNCUETBO EO----- SUNTEB cm W*Bt- “-2A.21 _.2O-i0 ITATE HWV NO iTATE HWW NO mm=ms SHU. ^ ^ BB*» f rws,# 3 HS .-• STATE MWWV NO 3t; ^ STATE HVVY NO J'B BVT ---------B EMT ----------- STMTfOBoi^ SHB liSKSSSSf: stbattobobo mk... STBATTOBO OBAV» w STBATTOMCm MB^ . ;i5*5:5I2::m S2b KS:;bV{Jo;*wba T=^^ I2^T »5SSb"‘v^° l2B-*0 ~ *A03 „.S0O1 ...3007 SmptE?>€WB0VW8 STEPAN cm 5E.at STEMLEBBO cob ------- stemlebbo obn .___ STEK3EB LABE LA VT „ iriv,’*.— STELLAB 3TB .. s;s;;;siss;tiS2B-:: STBESECIB aw ----------- "i^T STBceE^cm'ow ------------- •••’Trji s’BUNBSBOJT^---------- -B lS"ArE'ES*l:= .3007 .3007 .3A02 .30-30 JTEB n ENCIB SW------------- STEBNENCT CHS - S|1K^^~b’tobmb . STEWJNQAWE MB ......... BTEBUNOOB MTB--------- STEBUNO ST MWW----------- STEBUNOTEB EB ----- - STEBUNO WAT SW — STEVE OB UVT---------------- STEVEN LA LV-------------- STEVEN BO BBN------------ STEVENS AWE ----- STEVENS CT B““ STEVENS ST 71 fj »s:;sss§s: Lull ---- m ilHs'-fci ______3A-B* _40-57.*A-«B _______IA-2S ........... 2A-54 200SJA-M :::—_____..4S-T7 _______*S-12 ______SB-22 ________SC-22 ________SA-27 _______TSOB ______1B-SA *____IB-’D _.4A-3S.1A07 _______4001 iiirn^smjKjSiS «■-::==- 20-E -SAOt .. 5C-*5 3A-21A „.3C-2 _4A-47 20-22 ....ICtB 7M SUNNWSIOEOB 7M irSsK^; _tA.11.1B-«T ______.1C-11 \.ic-a Isrstssi" SUNBAT A1 SUNBAT O- ■ SUNBISE AWE -.3005 ...40-33 -.40-33 -40-24 SUNBtSEAWE SW----- SUNBtSEAWE icB W EB EOT I STEVENS ST 7H -ISSSSUW KKs;;;! ss SJJSTKSSr STEWART LA MB .. STEWART LA SSB STEWART BO W« STTCBLEW BLVO rio-.s' __4008 — 30 35 ...10-13 *8-40 .... 3002 . 4004 ___3A-21 __IB-13 __10-13 'sumac ow....— SUMAC cm EB . SUMAC CT WBL------ SU44AC LA B"N ------ SUMAC LA MB.-----— SUMAC LA NO-------- SUMAC ST STB . . suviac b 'OOE wsl. 5U*4ACHLA mo — 3I.*'MEBAWE MW.. SUMMER BV EB ----- summer ST 7M ... SUMMER ST MO . summer S» LO....... SUMMER ST **V SU SSmSEOB 7B- SUNBISEOB I SUMMEDB I SUNIUSSOB ___.-3C-1 ____2A-47 ___-10-30 ___1C-SA ___4B-21A ____38-20 ____3C-10 .20-20 . IC-3A SSSSISa cn .------------4^:^- 9UPIHB9C ' N SUNBJSf LANO*l SUNSET A— • aw.,..- AVE-------- SUNSr AWE NE LL AWl 5A .... _____AWt StT .. lUNSfT AWE NB8N . SUNSET . 1A-3A lEB ST NB MBL. iebstne pblS21ssSsr!E"= _______________SUMMERVILLE BO OBN :S?i S»&S!Tr.iISSKKSe" I4A-33 9 I 11,4. rr AN • *»* SStK3!S5i'=.-. .>S;'; !?-----sat::;'.:?: Miws'. KSSiSSSTINSC- 3L.0 04..-------—-----—I SUMMITLA BBN- 8Tm80NW.V0 SA ---------------------^J5 SUMMIT LA MH- STmSON BLWO HE 7*^..----------------- SUMMIT LA MB - . ^ass:rM*j;^=£i! SaS: SUMMIT ST CN - smuMirsT wBT. SUMMIT AVC -'V£S ISSS!::! S?: =?>; 5SS:!::!5K...2C-21 AVE SSB ^JM44*'AWE STB Sl'->MIT CT SSB .. -rj STB . ______CT WJB ... SUMMIT 0£ BC - aw-~-T BLWO w* sjsrfc"BS'- =rz^l — STIN STIN sljmv-i — - STINSON ST ST*. ST1BL1NO BO MOs.iblin OBO mo-------- - STWBUB ST EO .. -------- STOCXOALE (>*■ »N-------- _-4C-30 _.tC-30 __3A-20 -lC-28 -30-1B .. 3B-I2 5UM9BI Vb» b-'-w. SSSKSS. S5iss:s- - sunset OB SW ------ sunset 0« S mb ----- JSSKSS5 = SUNSET LA HO------- •iimSST u * in O.—- Su SeTLA MN ------ SUNSET • A **-------- SUMFTBO B b '.H SUNSET BO 440 ------- SUNSET TB CHN^__ -3C-*8 -4S-2ta SiJSSTBSWBR- S' 7 To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson Prom: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: May 16, 1989 Subject: Ordinance Amendment, Oversized Accessory Structures Introduction - In the spring of 1987, Council directed the Planning Commission to review the accessory structures section of the zoning code in relation to oversized accessory structures. The initial review occurred at a public hearing held Monday, July 20, 1987. The public hearing notice indicated the re’ ’.ew would be for a proposed 2unendment to establish performance standards for the location, floor area, and height of accessory structures exceeding 1,000 square feet in floor area as a conditional use. There were no public comments at the ^blic hearing, and the hearing was closed. Further discussions by the Planning Commission were held on December 1, 1987; February 25, 1988; May 18, 1988; July 6, 1988; and May 1, 1989. Those discussions resulted in a recommended ordinance aunendment attached hereto as Exhibit A. Discussion - The Planning Commission concluded that a conditional use permit is not the appropriate approach to oversized accessory structures, and instead set up performance standards for oversized accessory structures as a permitted accessory use. The following list summarizes the Planning Commission recommended ordinance revisions: 1. Defined "oversized accessory structure" as having a footprint area greater than 1,040 square feet. 2. Allowed as a permitted use, one (1) oversized accessory structure per property. 3. As lot size increases, the maximum allowed oversized accessory structure size could increase. 4. Likewise, as lot size increases, the total combined footprint area of all accessory structures on a property can increase. 5. Excluded pools, tennis courts, paddocks, barns, stables and greenhouses from being subject to the "size versus lot area" requirement (also see #9 below). Ordinance Amendment, Oversized Accessory Structures May 16, 1989 Page 2 of 2 6. All oversized accessory structures must meet principal structure setbacks, and in no case can be less than 30* from the side or rear lot line, and must be behind the front line of the house. 7. Oversized accessory structures are subject to the current "30*maximum/no higher than principal residence" standard. 8. All permitted oversized accessory structures are subject to a written covenant with the City that does the following: A) If a subdivision occurs, the structure must stay on a lot with a principal structure. If it doesn't, the Council could grant a short grace period in which to construct a principal structure, or could require that the oversized accessory building be removed. B) If a subdivision occurs, the lot area required to accommodate that oversized structure must be retained. C) Likewise, the required oversized accessory structure setbacks must be retained. Staff anticipates a standard format covenant would be drafted, and its execution required prior to building permit Issuance. 9. Non-roofed oversized accessory structures such as tennis courts, etc. would continue to be allowed, but would be required to meet principal structure setbacks as well as hardcover requirements where applicable. 10. All lots less than 2 acres in area are limited to 15% lot coverage by structures, not including tenis courts, pools, and other non-covered structures. Staff Recommendation - Staff recommends approval of the proposed ordinance as recommended by the Planning Commission. ORDIHAMCE # , SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE BY ALLOWING OVERSIZE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES WHICH MEET SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS The City Council of Orono ordainn as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 10 of the Municipal Code of Orono is hereby amended by repealing Section 10.03# Subdivision 9 (C) and adding a new Section 10.03# Subdivision 9 (C) to read as follows: C. ;^rea Restrictions. In all "R" districts no accessory buil:^* ^ shall exceed 1#040 square feet of footprint area e>. -rti. . chat accessory structures in excess of 1#040 square fe^t will be allowed under the following conditions: 1. Not more than one oversized accessory structure shall be permitted on any property. An "oversized accessory structure" is defined as an accessory structure of footprint area in excess of 1#040 square feet. 2. Oversized accessory structures are regulated by the following table: Lot Area Maximum Individual Accessory Structure Footprint Area Maximum Total of Accessory Structure Footprints Areas 0-1.99 acre 1#040 s. f.2#080 8.;* 2.00-3.00 acre 1#200 s. f .2#400 s.: 3.01-3.50 acre 1#400 s. f .2#800 s.f 3.51-4.00 acre 1#600 s. f .3#200 s.f 4.01-4.50 acre 1#800 s.f •3#600 s.f 4.51-5.00 acre 2#000 8 . f .4#000 s.f 5.01-6.00 acre 2#200 S.f.4#400 s.f 6.01-7.00 acre 2#400 s.f.4#800 s.f 7.01-8.00 acre 2#600 s.f.5#200 s.f 8.01-9.00 acre 2#800 s.f.5#600 s.f 9.01 acre or more 3#000 s.f.6#000 s.f Structures specifically excluded from being regulated by these restrictions include: a)uncovered arenas or paddocks; b)uncovered swimming pools; c)uncovered tennis courts; d)stables; e)barns; Page 1 of 3 f) 3rreenhouses; 3. Any oversize accessory structure shall be subject to the following ^-^ons: a) No such accessory structure shall be located within a required yard area (principal structure setbacks must be met). Further, no such structure shall be nearer the front lot line than the front line of the principal residence on the property, and no such accessory structure shall be located less than 30* from the side or rear lot line regardless whether less strict principal structure setbacks apply. b) The maximum height for such accessory structure shall be 30* or the defined height of the principal residence structure on the property, whichever is less. c) Such structure shall be allowed only when the property owner agrees and covenants in writing with the City as follows: 1. No future subdivision will be approved that places the structure within a lot that has no principal structure, except that the City in its subdivision approve' may grant a finite time period in which the oversized accessory structure may remain without a principal structure, in order that a principal structure may be constructed. At the end of this time period the oversized accessory structure must be removed if no principal structure has been constructed, ii. If the property is subdivided the oversize accessory structure and pri^.'lpal structure will be located together within a lot that meets the min in. mi lot area require ment for the given size of accessory building. iii. In subdivision approval, the setback required for the oversize accessory structure as definod herein shall remain. Such covenant shall be binding on current and future property owners and shall be filed ip the chain of title of the property. Page 2 of 3 4. Non-roofed accessory structures such as tennis courtSf private swimming pools, and paddocks, which exceed 1,040 square feet in area shall r»ot be located in any required yard as defined foi each zoning district. SBCTIOH 2. Chapter 10 of the Municipal Code of Orono is further amended by adding Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) as follows: C. Lot Coverage. In all zoning districts, for all lots of 0-1.99 acre in total area, the total combined footprint areas of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 15% of the lot area. Sheds and other small buildings less than 120 square feet footprint area shall not be included in calculation of total accessory structure foot print areas. SBCTIOH 3. Adoption and Publication. This ordinance shall be effective upon adoption, and a short summary shall be published in the Laker and Pioneer newspapers. Adopted by the City Council of Orono on this _ _ _ _, 1989, by a vote of _ _ ayes and _ _ nays. day of Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Jcunes R. Grabek, Mayor Page 3 of 3 m Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Orti G Bonctfino PE RObrtt VV HMenr PE Joi^pn C Anoei X PE BrMfoftl A Lfrnbctg. PE Picnanl E Tuton PE limn C CXujn. PE Gtmn R Coofc PE Ihomji E No>e\ PE Rtitxrr G Schijnitht PE Maivm L SorvaU. PE PCMh A Gomcxi PE Rch.«tJ W Fo«Pf PE DonjkJ C Sorgan#. PE Jetty A BouiUon PE Ma»k A Hanwn PE T«j K F<« PE MichacK T Raixmartn PE RotW R P»fWpflf PE DavxJ O LOlitoia PE Ihomai W f>n*Tion, PE MithaH C Lyrtfi PE Jam« R Maland PE Kmn«ti P Andrwi- PE KMh A Bachmann PE Mark R fioRv PE Rdtxrrt C Ru vvk A l A Thomat E Angu\ PE Howard A Sanftyd PE Oarwr J Edgfrtoo FC Mark A PE Ph<H) J Caiw«*. PE Mark O \kidXtv PE ThonvJi R Andftiort AIA Gary F Py4andrr PE Charl« A Erickioo Leo M PawcHky HarlanM Ovxi Suvjr M Eberkn C PA Engineers & Architects May 18. 1989 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Re: Sanitary Sever Improvements Lift Station 10 Replacement Lift Station 43 Replacement Our File No 13940 Dear Mayor and Council: On Friday, May 12, 1989 sealed bids were received for the above referenced project. The low bidder was Albrecht Excavcatlcn, Inc. with a total base bid of $181,640.65. A total of six (6) bids were received. All bids have been reviewed and computer checked. A copy of the tabulation is enclosed for your review. The following is a summary of the bids received: Albrecht Excav., Inc. Northdale Const. Co. 0 & P Contracting, Inc. Brown & Crls Kenko, Inc. G.L. Contracting, Inc. Part I $126,184.40 145,980.00 160,044.50 181,663.25 178,865.24 188,605.40 Part II $55,456.25 58,416.00 75, 93.50 58,136.75 74,406.74 91,200.24 Total $181,640.65 204.396.00 235.638.00 239.800.00 253,271.98 279,805.64 The City is proposing to finance Part I with connection charges and revenue from sever rates. The connection charge will be levied against future units to be connected to the system. The City is proposing to finance Part II with funds received from MUCC for eliminating a lift station and revenue from sewer rates. The MVCC has agreed to provide approximately $41,000 to the City of Orono if the lift station is eliminated. The City would have to provide $14,456.25 plus administrative costs from the sever operating fund to finance Part II. Page 1. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 City of Orono Orono, MN Re: File No. 13940 May 18, 1989 Albrecht Excavation, Inc. has completed several projects for our firm in i.ha City of Apple Valley this past construction season. All work was completed satisfactorily and in a timely manner. We would recommend the City award the project to Albrecht Exca/ation in the amount of $181,640.65. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRCtli Page •>, rhBULkJim OP FTvg low bids of six received PROPOSAL FOR SANITARY SEUER IHPR. fLlFT STATION 10 REPLHLIFT STATION 43 REPL.) OROWO^RR PROJECT MO. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ffp!—12242- - - - - - - - - - - - - - BID OPENING 10:30 A.M.. C.D.S.T. FRIDAY. HAY 12. 1989_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I hereby certify that this 1» en exect reproduction otb€d» received. . Reo.No. 9AS1 GLENN R. COOT, P.E. PROPOSAL ITEM 1 ALBRECH 2 NORTMIALE 3 0 I P 4 BRONN I CRIS EXCAVATING. INC. CONSTRUCTION. CO CONTRACTING. INC. _ _ _ _INC. KENKO INC. Detcriotion Quantity Unitt ijnit Jp-tti Ijnil Total PART T - LIFT STATION 10 REPLACEWENT 8* PVC, 10‘-12' deep in place 35 L.F. 17.00 595.00 8* PVC, 12‘-14• deep In place 100 L.F. 17.00 1,700.00 8* PVC, 14*-16* deep in place 50 L.F. 19.00 950.00 10* PVC, 10*-12' deep in place 120 L.F. 20.00 2,400.00 ' PVC, 12*-14* deep in place 70 L.F. 23.00 1,610.00 10* PVC, 14*-16' deep in place 70 L.F. 24.M 1,680.00 10" PVC, 16*-18' deep in place 100 L.F. 25.00 2,500.00 12" PVC, 12‘-14* deep in place 320 L.F. 12.00 7,040.00 12* PVC, 14*-16' deep in place 180 L.F. 24.00 4,320.00 12* PVC. 14’-16' deep (SDR-26) in pi. 80 L.F. 26.00 2,080.00 12- PVC, 16’-18’ deep (SOR-26) in pi. 80 L.F. 31.00 2,480.00 12* PVC, 18'-20* deep (SOR-26) in pi. 90 L.F. 37.00 3,330.00 12' PVC, 20*-22' deep (SOR-26) in pi. 150 L.F. 45.00 6,750.00 12* PVC, 22'-24* deep (SOR-26) in pi. 140 L.F. 47.00 6,580.00 Std. NH 8* deep, 4' dia., w/16428 ettg. 8 Each 8(X).(X) 6,400.00 Manhole depth than 8’ deep 65 L.F. 50.00 3,250.00 Cut Banhola into axiiting 12* line 1 Each 400.00 400.00 5 Cut aanhole into existing 8* line 2 Each 400.00 800.00 15.00 16.00 17.00 21.00 22.00 23.00 24.00 29.00 30.00 35.00 36.00 37.00 38.00 40.00 900.00 65.00 000.00 300.00 525.00 1,600.00 850.00 2.520.00 1.540.00 1.610.00 2.400.00 9.280.00 5.400.00 2.800.00 2,880.00 3.330.00 5.700.00 5.600.00 7.200.00 4.225.00 5,000.00 600.00 Unit 33.00 34. x 35. x 36. x 37. x 37. x 38. x 39. x 39.x 39. x 40. x 41. x 42. x 43. x 1,0X.X 70.x 3X.X 3X.X I2.tll ynjl TotPi Unit I2llk 1,155.x 39.70 1,389.50 42.25 1,478.75 3,4X.X 40.30 4,0X.X 42.25 4,225.x 1,750.x 41.65 2,082.50 42.25 2,112.50 4,320.x 41.75 5,010.x 41.42 4,970.40 2,5X.X 43.50 3,045.x 41.42 2,899.40 2,590.x 46.x 3.2X.X 41.42 2,899.x 3,8X.X 49.50 4,9X.X 41.42 4,142.x 12,4X.X 48.70 15,584.x 52.25 16,7X.X 7,020.x 52.x 9,504.x 52.25 9,405.x 3,120.x 54.x 4,3X.X 55.92 4,473.x 3,2X.X 58.70 4,696.x 55.92 4,473.x 3,690.x 64.x 5,832.x 55.92 5,032.x 6.3X.X 75.x 11,2X.X 55.92 8,3X.X 6,020.x 83.20 11,648.x 55.92 7,828.x 8,0X.X 965.x 7,7M.X 1 ,0X.79 8,550.32 4,550.x 71.x 4,647.x 63.05 4,098.25 3X.X 575.x 575.x 529.01 529.01 6X.X 290.x 5X.X 529.02 1,058.04 BT13940\HAY89 PROPOSAL FOR SANITARY SEWCR IMPR. fLlFT STATION 10 REPLWLIFT STATION 43 REPL.) OfOWO. HR PROJECT NO. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _FILc NO. 13940_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PAGE 2 PROPOSAL ITER ^ ALBRECHT EXCAVATING. INC. 2 NORTNDALE CONSTRUCTION. CO. 0 t P 4 0)NTRACTIN6.JHC. BROUN I CRIS INC. KEMCO INCl DRScrlotlon fiUintUx ynilt UQii Unit Total Unll Total ycH Total Ml Tottl PART I - LIFT STATION 10 REPLACEMENT CONT’D Reconstruct Invert > Manhole #420 1 Each 700.00 700.00 150.x 150.x 250.x 250.x 145.x 145.x 1W.99 IX.99 10* X PVC service wye branch 6 Each 68.ra 408.00 75.x 450.x 60.x 360.x 77.x 462.x 66.44 398.64 12* X 4* PVC service wye branch 14 Each 78.00 1,092.00 85.x 1.1X.X 85.x 1,190.x 91.x 1,274.x 86.82 1,215.48 Connect existing service line 20 Fach 160.00 3,200.x 120.x 2.4X.X 2X.X 4,0X.X 65.x 1,3X.X 384.70 7,694.x 4* CISP service pipe In place 250 L.F.9.00 2,250.x 10.x 2.5X.X 16.x 4,0X.X 15.25 3,812.50 18.69 4.672.50 4* CISP service riser pipe In place «0 L.F.11.00 660.x 15.x 9X.X 20.x 1.2X.X 17..0 1,062.x 18.69 1,121.40 leproved pipe foundation per 6* IncresMnt depth 3,200 L.F.1.50 4,8X.X 2.50 8.0X.X 1.20 3,840.x 1.x 3,2X.X 1.22 3,904.x Mechanical trench coapactlon 1,600 L.F.0.01 16.x 1.x 1.6X.X 1.x 1 O.X 0.25 4X.X 0.63 1,0X.X Rewve Lift Station 10 L S L.S. L.S.6.0X.X L.S.2,5X.X L.S.3,1X.X L.S.5,5X.X L.S.3,252.14 Coaoon excavation 1,900 C.Y.1.00 1.9X.X 2.70 5,130.x 4.50 8,550.x 4.M 9,120.x 3.01 5,719.x Bltuailn. us surfacing reeoval 3,000 S.Y.1.00 3,0X.X V50 4,5X.X 1.50 4,5X.X 1.34 4,020.x 1.09 3,270.x Cl. S aggregate base (100X crushed)2,400 Tern 8.67 20,8X.X 8.x 19,2X.X 9.35 22,440.x 9.10 21,840.x B.X 21,120.x Class 5 aggregate base shoulders (100Z crushed)250 Ton 8.67 2,167.50 11.x 2,750.x 9.35 2,337.50 9.10 2,275.x 11.01 2,752.50 2341 bltusilnous wearing surface 275 Ton 15.30 4,;'>7.50 23.x 6,325.x 16.50 4,537.50 16.05 4,413.75 17.61 4,842.75 2341 bltUBlnous binder surface 470 Ton 13.77 6,471.x 23.x 10,810.x 14.85 6,979.50 14.45 6,791.50 16.51 7,759.70 AC*1 bltuelnous eaterlal for elxture 45 Ton 127.50 5,737.50 130.x 5,850.x 137.x 6,165.x 134.x 6,030.x 148.57 6,685.65 Bltuelnous eaterlal for tack coat 300 Gals 1.02 306.x 1.35 405.x 1.20 360.x 1.07 321.x 1.10 330.x 2341 bitue. st. t driveway patching 50 Ton 30.60 1,530.x 40.x 2,0X.X 50.x 2,5X.X 32.x 1,6X.X 55.03 2,751.50 Erosion control fence 100 L.F.1.50 150.x 3.x 3X.X 4.x 4X.X 2.15 215.x 2.76 276.x Clear and grub trees 5 Each 250.00 1,250.x 120.x 6X.X 1X.X 5X.X 375.x 1,875.x 220.13 1.1X.65 Sod with 3* top-ioll 2,500 S.Y.1.80 4,5X.X 2.x 5,0X.X 2.30 5,750.x 1.90 4,750.x 1.88 4,7X.X Seeding w/3* topsoil, eulch and fertlUter 0.3 Ac.550.00 165.x 1 ,200.00 360.x 2,0X. 0 6X.X 3,750.x 1,125.x 2,751.57 825.47 TOTAL PART I - LIFT STATION 10 REPL.$126,184.40 $145,9X.X $160,044.50 $181,663.25 $178,865.24 BT13940\MAYB9 PROPOSAL FOR SAWITARY SEWtR IMPR. <Lin STATION 10 REPLULIFT STATION 43 REPL.^ OROHO. HW PROJECT NO. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _FILE NO. 139A0_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PACE 3 PROPOSAL ITEM 1 ALBRECHT EXCAVATING. INC. 2 NORTHOALE CONSTRUCTION. CO. 0 I P CONTRACTING.INC. BROWN S CRIS INC. KENKO INC. Deicrlotlon QwtntltY UnItF ZStiL yoii Tof i Mi Isiii Mi Mil Uoii icitL PART II - LIFT STATION 3 REPLACEMENT 10* PVC, 10*-12* dMp In place 10* PVC, U**16* daap In place 10* PVC. 16‘-18* deep In place Std. aanhole 8* deep, 4* dia., W/1642B citg. Nanhole depth greater than 8* deep Erosion control fence Reaove existing aanhole Drop aanhole section 800 L.F. 75 L.F. 50 L.F. 3 Each 15 L.F. 250 L.F. 6 Each 3.8 L.F. 20.00 20.00 23.00 800.00 50.00 1.50 200.00 175.00 10* X 4* PVC service wye branch 15 Each 68.x 10* X 6* PVC service wye branch 1 Each 79.x Cut Into existing aanhole 1 Each 650.x Connect existing service line 15 Each 16C X 4* CI8P service pipe In place 150 L.F.9.x 6* CISP service pipe In place 10 L.F.13.x laproved pipe foundation per 6* Incronent depth 1,300 L.F.1.50 Hechanical trench coapactlon 1,075 L.F.0.01 Reaove Lift Station 43 L S L.S.L.S. Coaaon excavation 5X C.Y.3 X Class 5 aggregate base (100Z crushed)950 Ton 8.67 Erosion control fence 250 L.F.1.50 Clear and grub trees 5 Each 250.x Sod w/3” topsoil 3,500 S.Y.1.x Seeding w/3‘ topsoil, aulch wixl fertilizer 0.3 Ac.550.x 16,000.00 1.500.00 1.150.00 2.400.00 750.00 375.00 1.200.00 663.00 1,020.00 79.00 650.00 2.400.00 1.350.00 130.00 1.950.00 10.75 6,000.00 1,500 00 8,236.50 375.00 1.250.00 6.300.00 23.00 24.00 25.00 900.00 65.00 3.00 75.00 120.00 75.00 85.00 300.00 100.00 15.00 20.00 3.00 1.00 L.S. 2.70 9.00 3.00 120.00 2.00 18,4X.X 35.x 1,8X.X 36.x 1,250.x 37.x 2.7X.X 1 ,0X.X 975.x 70.x 750.x 2.x 450.x 3X.X 456.x 220.x 1,125.x X.X 85.x X.X 3X.X 350.x 1,5X.X 3X.X 2,250.x 18.x 2X.X X.X 3.9X.X 1.x 1,075.x 1.x 2,5X.X L.S. 1,350.x 4.50 8,550.x 9.35 750.x 4.x 6X.X IX.X 7,0X.X 2.x 165.00 1,500.00 450.00 2,000.00 28,0X.X 26.10 20.8X.X 32.71 2,7X.X 31.x 2.325.x 32.71 1,850.x 37.x 1.8X.X 32.71 3,0X.X 965.x 2,895.x 1,049.18 1,050.x 71.x 1,072.50 63.05 5X.X 1.85 462.50 2.76 1.8X.X X.X 3X.X 361.96 8X.X 440.x 1,672.x 527.25 9X.X 77.x 1,155.x 66.44 X.X 77.x 77.x 67.27 350.x 345.x 345.x 5X.01 4,5X.X 65.x 975.x 38«.70 2.7X.X 15.25 2,287.x X.13 3X.X X.40 204.x 23.21 1,560.x 1.x 1,3X.X 1.22 1,075.x 0.25 268.75 0.63 3.1X.X L.S.5X.X L.S. 2,250.x 4.x 2,4X.X 3.01 8,882.x 9.10 8,645.x 8.x 1,0X.X 1.85 462.x 2.76 5X.X 1X.X 8X.X 2X.11 8,050.x 1.75 6,125.x 1.x 6X.X 3,7X.X 1,125.x 2,751.57 26,168.00 2,453.25 1.635.50 3.147.54 945.75 690.00 2,171.76 2.003.55 996.60 67.27 529.01 5.770.50 3.019.50 232.10 1.586.00 677.25 3,252.14 1.505.00 C,360.00 690.00 1,1X 15 6,580.x 825.47 TOTAL PART II • LIFT STATION 43 REPL.$55,456.25 $58,416.x $75,593.50 $58,136.75 $74,406.74 BT13940\NAY89 PROPOSAL FOR SANITARY SEUER IRPR. fLlFT STATIOM 10 REPLlfLlFT STATION 43 REPL.> PROMO. MN PROJECT NO. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _PILE MO. 139A0_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PAGE 4 PROPOSAL ITER 1 ALBRECHT EXCAVATING. INC. 2 NORTHDALE 3 CONSTRUCTION. CO. 0 t P 4 BROUN t CRIS frnWCTJNG^NC. INC. KENKO INC. Dctcriotiof)ftwatlty UnlSf Unil l2l£i Mi z&iBi MI l2iii Mi l2i&L Mi isiii TOTAL PART I - LIFT STATION 10 REPL. TOTAL PART II - LIFT STATION 43 REPL. TOTAL BASE BID S126.1B4.40 $3,456.25 S181.640.65 $145,960.00 58,416.00 $160,044.50 /5,593.50 $204,396.00 $235,638.00 $181,663.25 $8,136.75 $239,800.00 $178,865.24 74,406.74 $253,271.98 BID BOND, CERT. CHECK, CASH DEP. FIRM BY TITLE ADDRESS TELEPHONE NO. CERTIFIED CHECK ALBRECHT EXCAVATING, INC. DAVE HANES VICE PRESIDENT 5X BOND NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION, CO. THONAS J. SCHANY PRESIDENT $X BOND 0 I P CONTRACTING, INC. VIRGIL Ol'ILA PRESIDENT 10650 C0.RD.81 SUITE 133 5X BOND BROUN I CRIS INC. DONALD R. PAGE SECRETARY E.FRONTAGE RD OFl-35 19740 KENRICK AVE $X BOND KENKO INC. LUVERN NCGRAND CORP. SUP. 1694-91ST AVE NE BLAINE, NN 55434 1406 U. COUNTY RD. C 14450 NORTHDALE BLVD ROSEVILLE, NN 55113 ROGERS, NN 55374 ( } 633-4510 ( ) 428-4868 NAPLE GR., NN 55369 LAKEVILLE, NN 550U (612) 786-6510 ( ) 424-2523 (612) 469-2121 BT13940\NAY89 51089.4 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: May 10, 1989 SUBJECT: West Hennepin Human tiervices Board Appointment K Attachment:A. Letter to Marc McCabe Dated 4/25/89 B. Mr. McCabe's Fesume ISSUE - Determin .tion as to whether the City wants to appoint another representative to the West Hennepin Board or not. INTRODUCTION - The City during appointment review time had attempted to contact its alternate, Marc McCabe, to determine if he desired to be appointed to a full time position. We did not receive a response at that point and because the vacancy does exist on the Board for the second Orono representative slot we have recontacted him by lette):. DISCUSSION - On May 12, 1989 Mr. McCabe indicated he is Tnterested^n being one of the two primary representatives to the Board. The other representative is LaDean McWilliams. As you may be aware Lt. Gary Cheswick is also on ti»«. Board being appointed by the West Hennepin Board as a Police Department representative, but not one specifically one representing Orono. The appointmei.t of Mr. McCabe would not affect this. ALTERNATIVES 1. Appoint Mr. McCabe. 2. Seek other interested parties. 3. Choose to take no action. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that Mr. McCabe be appointed as Orono's second representative to the West Hennepin Human Services in addition to its other primary representative LaDean McWilliams. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that the City appoint Mr. Marc McCabe as one of its two primary representatives to the West Hennepin Human Services Board. Ayes _, Nays _. LaDean McWilliams, P.O. Box Chief Kilbo , Cyrstal Bay cmr OF aiiNcr CITl Post Offics Box 66 •Crystal Bay. M On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka 7 TA<i*V«\l,eVJT k April 25, 1989 Mr. Marc L. McCabe 3285 Lafayette Ridge Court Wayzata, MN 55391 Subject: West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board/Alternate Dea) Marcr Several months ago the City attempted to contact you to find out if you were interested in Csontinuing to serve as an alternate to this Board or in fact if you would be interested in having a full Board position. The City has not had a direct response from you to this and would like to know if you are at all interested in either position. Please respond by Friday, May 12, 1989, as to whether this would be of interest to you. Please call either Dorothy Hallin or myself to indicate your interest. If we do not hear anything, the City will need to appoint another person to the position of Board member. MEB/dh BUILDING a ZONING - 473-73S7 ASSESSING administration a finance - 473*7358 PUBLIC V'ORKS - 473-7359 06/03/85 Marc L. McCabe 3285 Lafayette Ridge Court Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Orono City Council P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota To Vnion It May Concern: TTAcuwiciorr cTif ur u>Auiiv>_1 55323 I would like to be considered for one of the vacancies on the West Hennepin County Human Resources Board. As you can see from my attached short biography, that I have been involved with Health Care for the past 12 years. 1984 to present 1982 to 1964 1960 to 1982 Coordinated Health Care Inc. (an HMO) Director of Management Services - Manage the HIS, Finance, and Claims departments for the second oldest HMO in the state of Minnesota. CompuCare Inc. Analyst/Programmer - Consult with hospitals and clinics for a facilities management company. Full time Consultant - Counseling Vietnam Veterans listed with the National Register for Vietnam Veterans Out reach Programs, and part-time working with children and adolescents with learning disabilities. Student/Respiratory Therapist - Completed a two year perceptorship with the United States Public Health Service, received undergraduate degree in Pulrounary Medicine, and worked as a Respiratory Therapist while working on Ph.D. in Child Psychology. I would appreciate the chance to discuss with the Couiicil my qualifi cations for the vacancy on the Board. During the day, I can be reached at 292-0860, or during the evening at 471-7692. Sincerely X- Marc L. McCabe 1972 to 1980 51089.5 /c TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat DATE: May 10, 1989 SUBJECT: Wayzata Community Education Representative ISSUE - Notification of vacancy for the positio- representative to Wayzata Community Education Board. Orono INTRODUCTION - As noted at the last meeting the Jity's representative to the Board has moved out of the City and the District would like another representative. DISCUSSION - At this time the City is not aware of any persons who are interested from that District. Solicitation of a name could either be done by the City or the School District. The District Community Education has indicated their willingness to seek a new applicant. ALTERNATIVES - 1. Take no action. 2. Request the School Board solicite an interested party from their Orono mailing list. 3. The City advertise. 4. Request CounciImembers contact people they know in the area to find out if there would be persons interested. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the City ask the School district to send a notice to Orono residents who live within their District to see if there are interested parties. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by _, that the Council direct staff to work with tTTe Wayzata School District to have them determine if there are other interested parties in service on that Board. Ayes _, Nays _. 51789.1 /3 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat DATE: May I", 1989 SUBJECT: Stubbs Bay Sewer Attachment A. Stubbs Bay Staff Memo Dated 1/5/89 B. Robert and Teresa Minkema Letter Dated 5/15/89 ISSUE 1. Review of background work done to date regarding the Stubbs Bay sewer. 2. Presentation of prelirainary/revised project layout. 3. Presentation of financing options. 4. Presentation of proposed process for decision. INTRODUCTION - As you may recall in February 1988 Michael Gaffron presented Fis Alternative Waste Management Study. This study indicated that sewering of the Stubbs Bay area was the roost cost effective way of permanently resolving the current and expected sewerage problems for many of the Study area properties. At the Council's May 25, 1988, meeting they directed Glenn Cook, City Engineer, to undertake additional soil borings together with updating the feasibility study that had originally been done in 1983. The draft revision was prepared last fall and staff reviewed it to develop an alternative way to reduce the expected cost that would range, depending on the area, from $12-18,000 per unit. The issues related to this were reviewed at staff's request by the Attorney in part last summer together with a review completed this past March. The City has reviewed the issue of financing this project together with other upcoming projects in the past month with its financial consultant. As you will note in Attachment A one possible scenario for financing the revised project was proposed. In addition the City has received Attachment B indicating the Minkema's are on the verge of having to do a substantial upgrade to their system. The system was noted failing this past fall and again this spring. The inspection of the property and a review of City records listed no verification of the extent of the existing drainfield and they will be facing a $2-4,000 for a temporary fix in order to undertake their addition. If they were to go for a more "permanent fix" with the mound system upwards of $10,000. In their case absent continuation of the failing system and/or pumping continuously they are facing some substantial expense. They are not alone as Mr. Gaffron has '~^<'^ated that at least two other properties In this area a r. a similar situation. DISCUSSION - IT Project Layout - The original project layout that had been developed in 1983 was the basis for an update done by the Engineer during the summer of 1988. Following discussions during the fall of 1988 he has a revised layout to minimize as much as possible the cost of service. This revision does provide the necessary neighborhood hookups in the two primary areas of concern, that being Stubbs Bay Northweaw and Stubbs Bay Northeast with availability of the project to abutting properties in each of the areas. The project does leave open the option as decisions are made of including "neighborhood hookups" in the other three areas at an additional cost provided the neighbors are in agreement to undertake that. Those construction costs can either be done individually or as part of the overall project. As noted above the original layout was looking at costs of $12- 18,000 per unit. The intent of this is to reduce these down to a range of $10-15,000. 2. Financing Costs - In addition to attempting to minimize the cost per unit for this, staff has looked at various ways of financing it. As you may recall in previous memos the primary means were: - A''.sessment - Connection Charge - User Fees - Reserve Charge It may be appropriate that the actual bonding be done in 1989 to avoid issues related to arbitrage limits. A. Assessments - The obvious concern of the City is to avoid a situation in assessing the entire pro-*ect as was done in the last sewer project. In order to avoid this a four pronged approach is proposed. These include: 1. Market rate appraisal by an accredited appraiser. 2. Having a specific percentage of residents submit a petition prior to bids and specs indicating their willingness to pay the estimated costs. 3. Use of an Administrative Law Judge to allow the "appeals" prior to the ordering of the project in order to fix an assessment on each property. 4. Requiring assessment waivers be signed by a specif, minimum percentage of residents prior to ordering * project. B. Connection Charges - Connection charges are ones that the City can impose for a reasonable amount over and above assessments which are not subject to a roarK^ vaj.ua increase test. It is anticipated that these charguA ^oald equal the balance of the cost per unit that is not already funded by assessment and/or user fees. The City does have the ability instead of collecting these on the front end, have them spread out over the length of the financing. It has beer: suggested that this be made available to people in exchange for a waiver of assessment. The City d«- have the right to require hook up to the project within 16 me of its completion under current codes. User Fees - The City could establish a separate user fee for to assist in financing the project. This would strictly than C. _ _ the area be a financing tactic and may make the issue more confused strictly using assessment and conneccion charges. Reserve Charge - A final means would be a reserve charge. The project Installation would accommodatfe“ additional units when built at the minimum size allowed. Should the City choose to participate on the front end of this project it would allow for reimbursement should other areas be required to tap into this line. Most probably the area in Cygnet Place would be a candidate for the future. For each $50,000 ♦•h Cxty would "buy" ol reserve capacity, it would reduce each unit cost about $500. ^ Process for Decision - The following is recommended as a for decision: process Event A. Public meeting Issues Date B. Petition from residents C. Engagement of an appraiser D. Decide financing options Discuss finances of waste 7/89 disposal study Discuss project Discuss layout Discuss means of financing Mini/n HTi percentage of persons 9/89 willing pay Dete consultant to 10/89 est ..blisi market benefit Level of -Assessment “Connection •. « l 3 j -Reserve fee E. Moratorium on development (Optional F. MUCA line amendment "determine level ot mir.te'’' •‘lopment G. Development of Pl«. and Specificatio . 1 project layout K. ^jojeot l^nes bid to ellov# I. Administrative Law Judge j. Signature of - Appeal waivers K. Award Project L. Bond Sale M. Construction N, A^opti^jn of connection Fees and assessment amounts Administrative Law Judge hearings and signature of appeals Market value appeals Minimum number acceptable Timing based on interest rates arbitrage annual limits a: fERNATIVES 1. Accept the information 2. Discuss alternate avenues 3. Table for June 22, 1989 discussion 4. Establish public meeting RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that a public meeting betv/eem staff amd the Stubbs Bay property r-- >rs be establi::?hed for July 21, 1989. This would b*' a meet of staff with interested neighbors and rc sertetive to review the study results, ojewc layout and th ? issues -ind what steps the need to undertake to have this project is further recommended that the project not be j0% of the residents in that area have agreed to project within the dollar values initially possibly a ^ preliminary residents established, undertaken unt undertake the established. The residents would then have to sign a waiver of assessment, 60% would have to waiver o* assessment in exchange for connection charges prior to the act^ial awarding of the bid. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by that the Council establish July 27, 1989 as a public meeting with staff and residents with public notice being sent to all property owners in the proposed plus the abutting areas fr the project. Further table the issue until the June 22, 1983 lu Ing at which time the Council would determine level of petition in project to be undertaken. Ayes _, Nays _. order the John Gerhardson, Public Works Director Jeanne Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Glenn Cook, City Engineer Michael Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Robert & Teresa Minkeaa, 3200 Bayside Road 11988 A TO: FROM: DATE: John Gerhardson, Public Works Director Thomas Barrett, Citv Attorney Glenn Cook, City Engineer Michael Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator May 17, 1989 SUBJECT: Stubbs Bay Sewer Project Attachments: A. Financing Alternatives Sewer Installation 8/2/88 B. Bonestroo - Stubbs Bay Sewer Improvements Revised Project Layout INTRODUCTION - The following represents a possible scenario for development of a sewer project in the Stubbs Bay area which currently has five sub areas delineated. OBJECTIVES A. Development of a sewer project to replace failed/failing/substandard septic systems which will become problematic in the longterm, particularly those abutting Lake Minnetonka. B. Installation of sewer at a price that is afford;»ble to residents. C. Installation of the project whicn has limited initial or projected longterm cost to the City. DISCUSSION - PROJECT LAY OUT - A revised project layout is noted in Attachment B. T’\is would provide the availability of sewer service to all five sub areas, so that they could eventually be hooked up to the trunk. This layout however, does not provide the "lateral" system to three of the areas at this present time. Service to these areas can be provided by either the extension of neighborhood? lines (for which there would be an additional cost to each of the properties) or a direct hook up of the property to the trunk line using either a private connection or an individual sewer pump for each house. ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST BREAKDOWN By area this breaks down as follows: STUBBS BAY NORTHWEST - This would be both a sewer main and a lateral installation for these severely substandard properties. The per unit costs are as follows: Per Unit # of Units TOTAL Sewer Main Charge $6,500 Service Line Charge 4,240 TOTAL $10,740 19 19 $123,500 80,560 $204,060 The cost of sewering this area is substantially reduced by including the other areas. STUBBS BAY NORTHEAST - This is the second area of existing high density development that has a large number of failed or failing systems. Per Unit # of Units TOTAL Sewer Main Charge - $6,500 Service Line Charge - 7,180 42 42 $13,680 $273,000 301,560 $574,560 BAYSIDE EAST/BEDERWOOD/BAYSIDE NORTH - The Other three areas will have a trunk available to them. Potential solutions for eventual hook up to each of those individual properties in those areas include either: A.) Separate "Service Line Charge" Per Unit Estimated « of Units TOTAL Bayside East Bederwood $9,140 9,700 10 14 $ 91,400 135,800 Bayside North 8,840 114,920 B.) Direct Connection to Trunk 1. ) Gravity where feasible 2. ) Individaal/Joint sewer pump Total Preliminary Construction Costs # of Units Sewer Main Service Line Stubbs Bay Northwest 19 $123,500 $ 80,560 Stubbs Bay Northeast 42 273,000 301,560 Bayside East 10 65,000 - Bederwood 14 91,000 - Bayside North 13 84,500 - TOTAL 98 $637,000 $382,120 1,019,1 FINANCING - The following proposal is outlined for financing the properties. On a per unit basis one possible scenairo could be - Stubbs Bay Northwest (19) Assessment per unit - $6,500 Connection charge - $3,000 Operational surcharge - 200/yr - 8 years - Stubbs Bay Northeast (42) Assessment per unit - $6,500 Connection charge - $5,000 Operational surcharge - 200/yr - 15 years -> Three sub areas (Bayside East, Bederwood, Bayside West) Assessment per unit - $6,500 Connection (the lower cost in these three areas is due to the fact that these areas will have additional cost for the hook up through a neighborhood connection line for which there would be an additional charge or as an alternative individual properties may connect or even a gravity line but have a substantial private connection cost. Possible Initial Financing Assessments Stubbs Bay NW 6500 xl9 Sewer Main Charges 123,500 Service Line Charges Stubbs Bay NE 6500 x 42 273,000 Bayside East 6500 x 10 65,000 - Bederwood 6500 x 14 91,000 — Bayside West 6500 x 13 84,500 - Connection Charges Stubbs Bay NW 3000 x 19 « Stubbs Bay NE 5000 x 42 Bayside East Bederwood Bayside West 637,000 57,000 210,000 - 1.) - 1.) - 1.) 267,000 Operational Capital (To be reimbursed by surcharges) Stubbs Bay NW (Current Value Equivalent) Stubbs Bay NE (Current Value Equivalent) 22,600 92,500 116,100 TOTAL 637,000 382,100 1,019,100 Reserve capacity (future hookups) - If City does $100,000 - Drops cost by $1000/unit ♦Footnote to previous page 1.) Should persons in the area jointly agree to such it could be an additional cost. Presently the cost of a new mound system is $7,500-10,000. Several of these areas are even able to install that. (In addition it is proooRed that the rates for this project be increased by the cosv of money for the project.) Reserve Capacity - The reserve capacity onnection charges that would be carried by the City would allow for eventual hook up of other substandard areas in the vicinity that may some day be hooked up. (The pipe and lift station size for this project to meet PCA engineering standards will have the capacity for more than the units proposed in the area. By using such an approach the individual costs are reduced and on a comparative basis would be substantially less than the City's "investment" in the most recently completed project.) Connection Requirement - All residents are required to hookup in 16 months (or those who currently have a failed, failing or substandard system would be required to hook up to sewer within 18 months.) Those who agreed to waive their assessment appeal could have the entire connection and surcharge converted to a special assessment, with the assessment fee spread to be over the life of the bonds. ALTERNATIVES 1. Accept the information. 2. Discuss/propose alternative financing. 3. Table. 4. Request staff to prepare a timetable and requirements for each point. 5. Hold an informational meeting. 6. Undertake a development moratorium. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that Council discuss reactions to financing and table for process and a future refinement of construction and financing layouts. EM LiiAk ^ilQ>^.. jyAcLliA, Oyuit rwun ^Hui (!aJt^ {!j<^ , , ^ lYL M h ^o L^JjAjl Vb '^JL^ouxJ^ r/t) ^ ^ndtudud, hi-'Mjt M.:ffuL ITioula ^4 /TjuJni^- UH/J jsL ^JMul "Mjl^ (himv^iM ~k) 6lMj£KiujO 'fii^. JaJjxta£) 7^ ,^-caJx ^^ihuJLAj^ oJt A^oO Sa^i^cLs^ £doM^ . 7kl huj^ ~H) ^/unO .um/yuLnUcd:^^ , ujAa/Au\ h /Lof- fhjL QXt^j^AjL^A&Uj 'Az) //uUixIj^ fZltaJJA jA^i//CjL. 7^ O ulK ^.^(OzxeA^ J\Lduj-ru.Jti i-At UJud^-ieA^ JCd^ ^ ^■lujL /Wid.itP uAt<XaM AJiAJ ^dxpti 't /MptuyL,. 6duu> U CbUahjut T/uct Cat ^ JnQMjjstieL an iAut (LdrL^ )ImjJjla. .jliM/ftJL. ,CUjL /nZjLn^ A?/n\/Ju:t ^ z))cj zno(^I~piA^ AAjd OLtdjiJll^ MlVt^ CL ^UW /IL&KAJt tUL^'CL Mz. ^ dJjM ca>C^LoM^ibut-lYl c2an/)^ COMMA, 'fo ML(J(lh!ML ^jtjL/yO ^ -iluo ULLMuO CUjM Mz^(!Mdi 'fo M[&nct CLdcU¥7g--nMM 'AAjHJuauUtci ^ Ocr^ MoJtK . f‘ ill f<'L a»c I m ■ij. __Tl^^uaclt h.Uyo ^0MlA..dh^AJ2JU ^~fp..mojf, j)OJtah/La ._ f (L(UJL . M .. Cukt'MM tt^ /bO-t l/}Qjlj:h^-DLL^ - d^CUlJlA. ^. .:'^J^e^and f^ohenE Mihhemcf^ __ ^200 6(xysioe _RpcLd______ Iona j^rjd<e. _m^. __ __(^\A^iUEn^CS--.. _____ 51089.6 TO: Mayor and City Council PROM: Mark E. Bernhardsonr City Administrato DATE: May 10, 1989 SUBJECT: Facility Site Analysis Attachment: ISSUE - A. Site Analysis Update Dated 5/17/89 B. Facility Tour Dated 5/18/89 C. Site A Alternatives 1. Presentation of further information on a site combination as requested last time. 2. Establishing a tour of other facilities. 3. Presentation of proposed steps in process. INTRODUCTION - As directed by Council at the May 8, 1989, meeting Boarman an(f Associates has developed further site prepraticn costs for Alternative 4 (the combination of the City Hall on Site A and Public Works on Site C). DISCUSSION- Site Analysis - A letter has been transmitted to the owners of site C to assist in determining a price for that parcel. It is expected that a preliminary response may be as early as the May 22, 1989, meeting and if not by the June 12, 1989, meeting. An additional item would be the approximate sale value of the current Crystal Bay site if vacated and sold. Attachment C illustrates a possible configuration of residential site sizes twice that of the neighborhood that would meet the 1/2 acres zoning code. The value of these lots is between $15-20,000 lot. The range in estimated value would be $50 (3 lots)-$100,000 (5 lots). The total acreage is 2.7 acres including streets. In order to so subdivide it would require rezoning from RR-IB (2 acre) to R-IB (1/2 acre). Most of the developed lots in Crystal Bay are under 1/4 acre west of Brown Road. This had been contemplated for the Crystal Bay area once sewer was installed. The parcels are actually 9 separate ones and to so sell would require various variances even to the 1/2 acre standard to develop. The City's common ownership rules would apply. TOUR - Attached is a listing for a possible tour for those interested from Council, Planning Commission and staff to view various facilities to primarily focus on the issue of construction quality. Additionally these may begin discussion of general design considerations and features. It would be helpful for the discussion if in your driving around the metropolitan area you could identify any buildings that you feel maybe an appropriate design. It is anticipated that the tour would take about 4 hours and would be best either a weekday morning or afternoon when the facilities are open. UPCOMING PROCESS - ISSUES Tour Tentative site selection Quality of Construction Updated cost estimates Financing Background and Direction for Financing Public Informational Meetings and Discussion Decision on Proceeding ALTERNATIVES - 1. Accept the information. 2. Establish possible dates for other facilities tour. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that having accepted and discussed any of the site preparation information that the Council indicate what days and times might be available for a tour of other City facility sites. See Attachment B for possible itinerary. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that the Council accept the information and direct staff regarding establishment of a facilities tour. Ayes _, Nays _. cc: David Kross ORONO XUNZCIPAL FACILITIES KAY 17, 1989 BOARMAN6J ASSOCIATES architecture ENGINEERING interior design SITE OPTIONS OPTION 1 OPTION 2 OPTION 3 OPTION 4 SITES A SITE A SITE B SITE C CITY HALL CITY HALL CITY HALL CITY HALL POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE SITE B SITE C PUBLIC PUBLIC PUBLIC PUBLIC WORKS WORKS WORKS WORKS 1. 2. LAND COST NONE UNKNOWN NONE UNKNOWN SITE PREPARATION A. Demolition $ 20,000 $20,000 NONE NONE B. Soils Correction NONE NONE $160,000 C. Landscaping/Screening D. Utilities $ 25,000 55,000 $ 20,000 40,000 ♦Sewer 12,500 25,500 12,500 12,500 ♦Water 279,000 147,500 135,000 12,500 E. Paved Surfaces 95-150 70.250 120.000 90.000 $422,650 $317,750 $287,500 $315,000 NOTE:SITE PREPARATION The major cost Impact for Sites A & B is Utilities. (12” 1000 G.P.M. well with pumps and holding tank § $135,000) The significant cost impact for Site C is soils corrections. 3. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS HAVING UNDEFINED COST IMPACTS. A. PHASING COSTS SITE A & B: Construction costs will tend to increase as the City Hall/Police Building and the Public Works Building would not be constructed simultaneously. PHASE I:Construct the Public Works Building on Site B. 222 North 2rid Street Mtnne.tpoli'j MinnesotJ 55401 612-339-3752 PHASE IT: Demo existing Public Works Building and construct new City Hall/Police Building on Site A. B. MUNICIPAL CAMPUS CONCEPT If both City Hall and Public Works are located on the same site, the construction time and cost will be reduced. Greater efficiently through shared facilities, better functional adjacencies, w»nd shared parking areas would be achieved. C. SALE OF CURRENT CITY OWNED SITES SITE A: Existing Municipal Site SITE B: Sewer Pond Site Values of Both to be determined. 4. ORONO MUNICIPAL FACILITIES SQUARE FOOT COST RANGE FROM LOW TO AVERAGE FOR BUDGET PURPOSES. LOW CITY HALL POLICE PUBLIC WORKS $65 S.F. 70 S.F. 35 S.F. .AVERAGE $75 S.F. 80 S.F. 42 S.F. 5. COMPARISON OF RECENT MUNICIPAL FACILITY COSTS A) City Hall/Pollce Facilities -Savage (1987) $75.00 S.F. -Maplewood (1986) $83.00 S.F. B) Police Facilitlea -Hutchinson (1987) $96.50 S.F. -South Lake Minnetonka (1987) $65.00 S.F. C) Public Works Facilitlea -Savage (1988) $55.00 S.F. -Chaska (1986) $41.50 S.F. -Champlin (1987) $36.50 S.F. BOARMAN& ASSOCIATES ARCHITFCTURE ENGINEERING INTERIOR DESIGN Z(tTC>Cai, M May 18,1989 Mark Bemhardson City Administrator CItyofOrono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Dear Mark: Enclosed find the revised breakdoMm of site options as related to site preparatioa Added to the previous cost options, is Option 2: Site A - City Hafl/Pollce. Site C - Public Works. I recommend we plan a tour of municipai facilities in the near future to help the Staff and Council reach a concensus on the level of quality for the proposed Orono facilities. I would Include the fbltowtng: Savage: City Hall/Pollce and Public Works Champlin: City Hali/Police and Public Works Chaska: Public Works Excelsior Police If any other recently built facilities come to mind that may be worthwhile touring, please let me know. Project Manager Enclosure DRK/Jmr 222 North 2nd Street Minnejpolis Minnesota 53401 612-JJ9-J752 tu. 1 uoaM.t.v» a.cL* tu, u 40 o -r • 0 ^0 s- 40 H'^a.c' si{ •0 ^0 5* 40 10 ^0 So 51089.7 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato DATE: May 10, 1989 SUBJECT: Telephone System - Request for Proposal O ISSUE - Receiving permission from the Council together with an approximate budget allocation for the acquisition of a telephone system for the City Hall and Public Works. INTRODUCTION - The City's current phone system was installed in December of 1984 at a cost of $3,600.00 plus installation. It has reached the point that this system can not be improved with additional lines and yet provide the ability to transfer from one person to another within the City Hall with a maximum of 4 incoming lines. DISUCSSION - For the last two mon*-hs Jeanne Mabusth has been exploring alternative systems with various vendors. It is anticipated at this point that the City could obtain a system that is capable of handling up to 12 outside lines and 48 stations for a cost of $3 0-12,000. This represeni-.; a baseline configuration. Smaller systems are really not -'/ailable. Systems under consideration would provide substantial features over what the City currently has. The City has a current need for 5 to 6 lir. 2S to serve 18 existing stations (14 Administration, 3 Public Works and 1 Council Chambers.) Installation of this system at the present time would be one that could be transfered to a new facility for under $1,500. Given the fact that anticipated cost of this system would be under the $15,000 limit requiring bids, staff is proposing that the City seek requests for proposals, which can not be construed as bids, from three to four vendors. This will allow the staff to combine the best analysis of the system and value for the money without being forced to stick strictly with the lowest submitted proposal. ALTERNATIVES 1. Authorization to seek request for proposal and budget allocation of $10-12,000. 2. Table for further discussion. 3. Direct that bids rather than request for ^ ^posal be submitted. 4. Take no action. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council stafF to undertake request for proposal together necessary budget allocation for acquisition of a system. The staff would bring back these requests for to Council for actual undertaking of a contract with vendors. It is recommended that requests for proposal they reduce the time requirements, the bid requirements of credit together with the ability to better evaluate and their capabilities. authorize with the telephone proposals one of the be used as and types the vendor PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that the Council authorize staff to take the development and distribution to qualified vendors the request for proposal for a new phone system. Staff is further directed to bring back the analyzed request for proposal with a recommendation. The Council authorizes the appropriation of up to $12,000 from the budget reserve for this acquisition. Ayes __, Nays __• cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Thomas M. Kuehn, Finance Director 51889.1 n TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato DATS: May 18, 1989 SUBJECT: Police Supervisory Implementation F Attachment:A. Chief Kilbo*s Memo/Police Supervisor Implementation INTRODUCTION - When the recommendation for t^'e appointment of the second lieutenant was made, it was ir.:F.^ated that a third posiiton would be sought. The rationale for such was presented at the April 24, 1989 Council meeting. At that time it was indicated that the implementation of the third position would be presented at a subsequent Council meeting. DISCUSSION - Attachment A represents an outline of the alternatTves regarding implementation together with his recommendation and basis for such. RECOMMENDATION- It is recommended that the Council accept the Chief's information regarding the implementation plan for a third police supervisor. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by __, seconded by , the Orono Council accepts the information from the PolTce regarding his implementation plan for the thir*’ supervisor. Ayes __, Nays __. POLICE SUPERVISOR IMPLEMENTATION I will list five different alternatives for implementation of a third supervisor- Our present structure consists of one Chief, two supervisors at Lt. rank, twelve full-time patrol officers, one part-time officer- In addition, there is one Community Service Officer, an Administrative Assistant, and two part-time secretaries- In order to have supervision on each shift, another supervisor needs to be implemented. The timing of this implementation needs to be considered. ALTERNATIVES 1. The selection of a supervisor from within the Department at this time by going through a process similar to that last promotion or a selection based on the promotional process. 2- The second alternative is to delay implementation to allow for leadership development from present officers, then go through a process of testing, leading to an appointment by the Council. There are some officers that show promise that could be enhanced by schooling and experience. 3. The third alternative is to look both inside and outside of the Department for supervisory candidates at this time. This would involve outside candidates along with present Department employe'is. This testing process would of necessity have to have a written test, a physical and psychological test as well as an oral interview, concluding with the final oral with the Chief and City Administrator looking for the appropriate leadership traits for the Orono Police Department. The City Administrator would forward the recommended finalist to the Council for appointment. The testing process would likely cost about SlOOO-^1000. If someone from the outside were selected, this process would require an expenditure of about ^45,000-^50,000. 4- The fourth alternative is to ask for candidates only from outside the Department. This action again would require a new position, costing approx. $45,000-^50,000 plus testing costs. A primary consideration is that any position replacement in alternatives 3 and 4 would require negotiation with contract cities as it will impact on their costs, especially with new levy limits being proposed. 5. The fifth alternative is like alternative #4 as it would go to the outside for candidates without any participation from Department officers. This alternative would, however, involve waiting until a vacancy occurs on the Department, for whatever reason, until testing would commence. There would be a testing cost similar to #3- not require a position replacement. SELECTION CRITERIA This process would This process would involve some sort of a written test, an oral process, and a recommendation for appointment by the Chief and the City Administrator to the Council. The criteria for selection would be similar to the 1989 test looking at officer interest, number of years of police exoerience, whether in Orono or in total, educational requirements, and if going outside the department, pyschological fitness for the position, as well as meeting leadership qualities needed by our Department which has a strong public relations need, with service to our citizens being our major theme. RECOMMENDATION It is my considered position and request that the implementation of a third supervisor be delayed until October so that present employees have a chance to further develop their leadership skills so that the Department could seriously consider the present employees. As a result of the last two testing processes, I and the Department supervisors do not feel the Department has a promotable candidate at this time. This delay also will permit the second supervisor to become more confident, more fully developed in his supervisory leadership role and allow for training the third supervisor. I will continue the team leader program to enhance leadership potential from interested officers to cover periods when a supervisor is not scheduled. I hope to further assist both the Department and the Councils by putting into writing the Departments' objectives and goals, both short term and long term. 51789;3 O TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat DATE: May 17, 1989 SUBJECT: Accessory Sturcture Moratorium Attachment;A. Draft Moratorium (Interim Ordinance) (To be presented Monday night) O ISSUE - Determine the specifics of the interim ordinance as it relates to a moratorium cn accessory structures construction. INTRODUCTION - At the Council's May 8, 1989 meeting they directed an interim ordinance be adopted for control of accessory structures until such time as the Accessory Structure Ordinance revised is adopted. At the Planning Commission's May 15, 1989 meeting they had finalized their issues and have presented them to Council for their consideration. DISUCSSION - The major issues related to the interim ordinance are as follows: 1. Duration - The Council directed a duration not to exceed 90 days, but it would be appropriate that any repeal be coterminus with adoption of the revised Accessory Structure Ordinance. 2. Accessory Currently the Structures Included in Moral, ium - ordinance requires any structures over 1,000 square feet require a variance. The extent of the interim ordinance would limit at some level other accessory structures. Alternative limits could include; 1. size 2. type of structure 3. total square footage 3. Applicability - The City is in process on a number of requests for accessory structures and application of this ordinance would be of importance in which situations the City would have this applied to; 1. Accessory structures seeking variance Council approval. or other 2. Applications that had been submitted prior to May 8, 1989 not requiring Council approval. 3. Applications issued prior to May 3, applications submitted after May 22, 1989. 1989 for RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the interim ordinance include the following: 1. Termination upon adoption of the Accessory Structures Ordinance, 2. Level of applicability. - It is recommended that this not apply to any building under 500 square feet where the total coverage of the lot is under the proposed total set forth in the proposed revised ordinance. 3. It is reconanended that this apply to any applications submitted after May 8, 1989. ACTION ALTERNATIVES - 1. Discuss and adopt. 2. Amend and adopt. 3. Choose to take no action. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by , that the Council adopt Attachment A as amended by Council for"Tmplementation of a moratorium until adoption of a revised Accessory Structures Ordinance. Ayes _, Nays _. ORDINANCE NO SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AN INTERIM ORDINANCE TO IMPLEMENT A TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON ACCEPTING AND CONSIDERING PERMITS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES The City of Orono ordaiiiS as follows: Section 1. In 1987, the City Council authorized the Planning Commission to undertake a study of the accessory structures section of the zoning code. The Planning Commission held hearings and discussions during 1987 and 1988 and has recommended certain ordinance revisions. The City Council seeks to enact a temporary moratorium related to accessory structures in order to protect the integrity of the planning process while it considers adopting or amending relevant official land use controls. Section 2. Restrictions. During this moratorium, the City will: (a) Not accept any applications for land use or other approvals for accessory structures; and (b) Not grant any land use or other approvals for accessory structures for applications submitted after May 8, 1989. Thcise restrictions will not apply to any building under 500 square feet where the total coverage of the lot is under the proposed total set forth in the proposed ordinance related to accessory structures, attached hereto. Section 3. Termination. This ordinance shall terminate 90 days from the date of publication or immediately upon adoption of an Accessory Structure Ordinance. ADOPTED this _ of ___________ Ayes and day of 1989 by a vote .Nays. Mayor Adrainistrator/Clerk 528ZJLP ORDINANCE # r SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE BY ALLOWING OVERSIZE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES WHICH MEET SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE ST/^ARDS The City Council of Orono ordains as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 10 of the Municipal Code of Orono is hereby amended by repealing Section 10*03^ Subdivision 9 (C) and adding a new Section 10.03/ Subdivision 9 (C) to read as follows: C. Area Restrictions, /n '11 "R" districts no accessory building shall exceed 1,040 square feet of footprint area except that accessory structures in excess of 1,040 square feet will be allowed under the following conditions: 1. Not more than one oversized accessory structure shall be permitted on any property. An "oversized accessory structure" is defined as an accessory structure of footprint area in excess of 1,040 square feet. 2. Oversized accessory structures are regulated by the following table: Lot Area Maximum Individual Accessory Structure Footprint Area Maximum Total of Accessory Structure Footprints Areas 0-1.99 acre 1,040 s. f.2,080 s.f. 2.00-3.00 acre 1,200 s.f.2,400 s.f. 3.01-3.50 acre 1,400 s.f.2,8.00 s.f. 3.51-4.00 acre 1,600 s.f.3,200 s.f. 4.01-4.50 acre 1,800 s.f.3,600 s.f. 4.51-5.00 acre 2,000 s.f.4,000 s.f. 5.01-6.00 acre 2,200 s.f.4,400 s.f. 6.01-7.00 acre 2,400 s.f.4,800 s.f. 7.01-8.00 acre 2,600 s.f.5,200 s.f. 8.01-9.00 acre 2,800 s.f.5,600 s.f. 9.01 acre or more 3,000 s.f.6,000 s.f. Structures specifically excluded from being regulated by these restrictions include: w a)uncovered arenas or paddocks; b)uncovered swimming pools; c)uncovered tennis courts; d)stabler, e)barns; Page 1 of 3 f) greenhouses; 3. Any oversize accessory structure shall be subject to the following conditions; a) No such accessory structure shall be located within a required yard area (principal structure setbacks must be met). Further, no such structure shall be nearer the front lot line than the front line of the principal residence on the property, and no such accessory structure shall be located less than 30* from the side or rear lot line regardless whether less strict principal structure setbacks apply. b) The maximum height for such accessory structure shall be 30* or the defined height of the principal residence structure on the property, whichever is less. c) Such structure shall be allowed only when the property owner agrees and covenants in writing with the City as follows; i. No future subdivision will be approved that places the structure within a lot that has no principal structure, except that the Citv * its subdivision approval may grant a fi»* time period in which the oversized ac -ry structure may remain without a prji. ipal structure, in order that a principal structure may be constructed. At the end of this time period the oversized accessory structure must be removed if no principal structure has been constructed. ii. If the property is subdivided, the oversize accessory structure and principal structure will be located together within a lot that meets the minimum lot area require ment for the given size of accessory building. iii. In subdivision approval, the setback required for the oversize accessory structure as defined herein shall remain. Such covenant shall be binding on current and future property owners and shall be filed in the chain of title of the property. Page 2 of 3 w ■y. m 4, Non-roofed accessory structures such as tennis courts, private swimming pools, and paddocks, which exceed 1,040 square feet in area shall not be located in any required yard as defined for each zoning district. SECTION 2. Chapter 10 of the Municipal Code of Orono is further amended by adding Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) as follows: C. J.ot Coverage. In all zoning districts, for all lots of 0-1.99 acre in total area, the total combined footprint areas of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 15% of the lot area. Sheds and other small ouildings less than 120 square feet footprint area shall not be Included in calculation of total accessory structure foot print areas. SECTION 3. Adoption and Publication. This ordinance shall be effective upon adoption, and a short summary shall be published in the Laker and Pioneer newspapers. Adopted by the City Council of Orono on this _ _ _ _, 1989, by a vote of _ _ ayes and _ _ nays. day of i ^ ) Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Page 3 of 3 City of Orono Council Members The following people petition the City of Orono <./aluate the purchase of a surface drainage easement from the owners of Lot 17, Bk 3 Navarre Heights, to provide a means of removing excess water from Livingston Avenue. We feel the relatively small volume of water does not justify such a large expense of over $30,000. We feel that a small surface easement for a much smaller amount of money would be adequate. We also feel that the expense of providing for removal of water from the street should be paid for by the city, just as the cost of snow removal is paid for by the city. Let’s keep it simple and less expensive. 8. 9. a 10. 11., 12., 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 3533 Cr>*stal Place Orono, MN 55391 21 May 1989 Orono City Council Members Orono City Hall Crj'stal Bay Road Orono, MN 55391 To the City Council Members: It has come to my attention tliat on Tuesday, May 23rd, there will be a public hearing to decide whether or not to have a storm sewer drainage system placed in the Navarre Heights Addition. I am unable to attend Tuesday's meeting, and am placing this letter with the Council to give my views. I understand that the City's study shoT^s that the preferred location for an utility easement for the storm sewer to alleviate water problems for our neighborhood is through ra>' property. The current runoff situation does not affect me adversely, but by improving the neighborhood, it will only help us all. I am in favor of having the storm sewer systeni built if it will alleviate the problem on Livingston Avenue. But I just recently purchased this property and the adjacent lot, omd I am not in favor of nor do I have the budget for additional estimated assessments to ray peurcel in excess of $2,000. Therefore, I will grant a utility easement over the easterly 15 feet of my homesteaded property provided that: 1. there shall be no assessments placed against my property, and 2. the property will be returned to its current condition (including seeding or sodding). These are the terms under which I will grant the estseimont. This is my stance on the issue ai"'d aJ though I hope the problem can be resolved for the Cuffs and their adjacent property owners, I don’t feel it is to my benefit and therefore would only grant the easement provided there was no cost to me. Sincerely, Paul Ril o © TO: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator PROM; John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director DATE; May 19, 1989 SUBJ: Livingston Avenue Storm Sewer On April 24, 1989, Council accepted a feasibility report from the City Engineer regarding a storm we. . runoff problem at 3572 Livingston Avenue. The feasibility report was the res. petition from Mark and Karen Cuff of the above address re^, ing a solution to the flooding problems they have experienced after normal to heavy rainfalls. Following the April 24, 1989, Council Meeting, staff supplied information to Karen Cuff to exhibit to the affected property owners regarding location of a storm sewer and costs per lot. Since that time, neighbors of the Cuff's have submitted preliminary sketch plans of an alternative to the storm sewer by directing the storm above ground to the culvert inlet on Crystal Place. Regardless of which option is taken, easements from the Cuffs, as well as all properties affected downstream, will have to obtained. Cuffs have also submitted information objecting to an above ground drainageway and wish to proceed with an underground storm sewer system. The information presented by the Cuffs on Friday the 19th is additional information that staff and Council has not had time to review. Recommendation; To accept the information from the Cufffs and table any action on this matter until staff has had time to review and report to Council the effect, if any, regarding chemicals being discharged onto the Cuffs' or neighboring properties. Proposed Motion; It was moved by _ _ _seconded by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, to table any action on this matter until there has been further staff review regarding chemicals being discharged onto the Cuffs' or neighboring properties. , TO: FROM: Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrate 0^ Forwarded recommending tabling as proposed. o May 16, 1989 City of Orono Attn: Council Members Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Honorable Mayor & Council Members; We originally came to you for assistance in the drainage problem we are having. As stated in the past, due to the run off of our neighborhood, our property block 3, lots 16 and 17 has been used for a drainage site. At this time we are unable to obtain a building permit to further develop our property. All the run off has caused property damage to our driveway, ground errosion, and excess flooding in our basement. We have since found amother possible hazard. The run-off that settles in the back of our property carries contaminents such as road salt from the winter months, lawn ferterlizer and weed control chemicals. Last November stf our two dogs developed tumors at the same time. In December both went through surgery. One had four tumors removed, the other had a biopsy on a very fast growing tumor that turned out to be cancerous. Our pets are different breeds and different ages, but they have lived at our present address about the same length of time. In April of this year the one that had cancer died. This caused great concern to us in that we may be having cumulative chemical build up from the run-off and poor drainage on our property. We feel that a potential health hazard may exist for us or for future children at some point in time if this drainage problem is not corrected. Your final vote of "yes" on the installation of the proposed storm drain on May 22nd is necessary to us! This would put a stop -o our concerns and clean-up of the soil could ccxnmt .ce. Our property should NOT be the main drainage site for the neighborhood's water, road salt, and lawn chemicals. I have submitted pictures in the past showing the excessive water that flows through both of our lots and the aunount of water that stands in the street. I have attached information from periodicals on lawn chemical hazards, chemical ingredients found at every hardware and garden shop, our preliminary soil test, and the lab results of our dogs tumors. I hope you will take the time to read them and understand our concerns. Thank you, Mark & IfeTr^ Cuff 3572 Livingston Ave Wayzata, MN 55391 Ortho Weed Be Gone: Active ingredents; Dimethylamine salt of 2,4 Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid .. . . . . . " of 2,(2-Methyl 4 Chlorophenoxy)Dimethylamine salt Propionic Acid Inert ingredents; Equil to 9.0% 2,4 Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid Isomer Specific by AOAC Method 6.Dol-5 Equil to 9.6% MCPD 2,(2 Methyl-4-Chlorophenoxy) Propionic Acid o Danger: Corrosive to eyes, harmful if swallowed, avoid skin and clothing contact. Do Not induce vomitting. Consult Doctor. Ortho Kleen-up; Isopropylamine salt of Glyphosate 5% N-(Phosphonomethyl) Glycine 95% Routid-up; Isopropylamine salt of Glyphosate 18% N-(Phosphonoinethly) Glycine Ortho Brush-B-Gone : friclopyr (3,5,6 trichloro 2-Pyridinyloxyacetic Acid) Triethylaroine Salt 8% Inert ingredents 92.0% equil to 5.7% Acid Ortho Vegetation Killer; Prometon 1.86% 2-Methoxy-4,6-bis(lsopropylamino)-S-Trazine Pramitol Weed & Feed by Greenthumb: Active ingredents; Dimethylamine salt of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid Dimethylamine salt of 2(2-Methyl-4-Chlorophenoxy) Propionic Acid Dimethylamine salt 2-(2,4-Dichlorophenoxy) Inert ingredents; 2,4-Dicblopophenoxyacetic Acid 2-(Methyl-4-Chlorophenoxy) Proponic Acid 2-(2,4-Dichlorophenoxy) Propionic Acid By Isomer Triamine In undergoing my research I have found that these chemicals have much controversy in reference to potential health hazards. One of the chemicals, 2,4-Dichlrophenoxyacetic Acid has been linked to be a cancer causing chemical in excessive exposure. It caused soft tissue sarcoma, hodgkins disease and non-hodgkins lymphoma. Our dog died from fibrosarcoma, a form of soft tissue sarcoma. Our soil test from the University of Minnesota indicates high levels of acid, phosphorus and potassium exist. Further testing needs to be done to know which chemicals are contaminates in our soil that would cause a health hazard. o These tests would pinpoint the hazardous chemicals and their toxic levels. The cost of these test would be between $800.00 and $1«000.00 per Twin City Testing. Our lab test on the dogs tumors show that two samples were submitted to the Oniversity of Minnesota Veteinary Lab. The first was from the smaller female indicating a lipoma tumor. The second was from the male indicating a malignant tumor, fibrosarcoma cancer. For us to find out if the dog that we still have is contaminated by pesticides the cost would be $140.00. This would be for carbamates, organophospates, and organochlorines. The test for herbicides would be more costly due to the specific chemicals. This would cost approximately $500.00. With the installation of the storm drain, we would not have to have all of these tests performed. We would still have our dog tested (this would indicate if we would be at risk) and some soil testing done. This would give us information on how to reverse any adverse effects that may be present. o SOIL TEST REPORT UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA SOIL TESTING LABORATORY ^511 LiViNuSTC;. AVt HAY^ArAt 53jn Soti Science Deoartrrent Horticultural Science Oeoartftient Agricultural Extension Service Agricultural Experiment Station Cooperating Report NO: 1)^73^ Laboratory NO: 1260b Date Received: 03/09/0'i Date Reported: 35/10/09 O Soil Test Results Sample Designation Soil Texture Soil pH Buffer Index Organic Matter P Phosphorus (lb/A) K Potassium (Ib/A) Soluble Salts (mmhos) Li-AM /.S HcJIUH 1204»3^0 0.2 * OLSEN - P INTERPRETATION OF SOIL TESTS )il Nutrient Levels: pH.................................. Phosphorus (P) . , . , , Potassium (K).............. Soluble Salts________ Low Medium High ^ ppppppppppp RECOMMENDATIONS pna; HfiMF LAI.MS Ll.-ic rLiC.]i-l.ME»NOATlLN: iNCNE RECOMME^sCrlu THE AMOUNT Jf EACH PLANT NUTRIENT TU APPLY: aTKLUtH IN) 3I0O LliS/IoCO SU.FT. * ■f PHnSPHATE (P2J5) + -KENTUCKY 3LUEGHASS POTASH (K2u) 0.0 LdS/lOOO SU.FT. ♦ 0.0 LOS/iOOO SO.FT. apply a fCUTlLUcR THAT SUPPLIES THE RECCflMENJCO AMOUNTS UF P lAkT iNCTi-.icfUlj. —CA0r..N: TbC.A3CVE^EHRT^LIZ^R^RECC.HE^^ IS^FOR THE^EHTIRJ^ 1/3 SHJUL0''B£''APPLIEu^liEr«Eerl MaY 15 AND MAY 25. : i'A Si SSiSill^ is iTo 5^5 ii: IS ..lcUHME.ULL n-AT THt FERTILIZER 36 THORUUGHLy WAIERLO IMTU THE SOIL. the SLLUoLc salts TEST INDICATES: NO SALT PKCOLEM EXISTS. ounty: :r additional information contact your ounly Extension Agent:^^, Receipt: This is to acMnowledge receipt of payment in the amount of $ ^ ^ jq CUSTOMER COPY o © UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES Owner: Karen Cuff Wayzata, MN Minnesota Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratories College of Veterinary MeOidne 1943 Carter Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 (612) 625-8787 Date: December 22, 1988 Long Lake Veterinary Ciirnc 1854 W. Wayzata Blvd, Box 10 Long Lake, MN 55356 Specimen: One fixed skin mass and received. •Accession No.: 088-33078 Received: 12-20-88 Species: canine Breed: Sex: M Age: 6 yr, 8 yr Weight: Herd/Flock Size: Clinical Signs: 90#, 75# tfiy small fragments of a second mass were Gross: Histopath: The larger mass was brownish-white, firm, smooth, spherical, and measured 1 cm in diameter. The fragments were dark red to brown. The first mass is partially encapsulated and consists of sheets and islands of mature fat cells separated by moderate to abundant mature fibrous connective tissue. Fat cells are detected at all margins of the mass. The second mass is an unencapsulated neoplastic prolferation of various sized spindled or stellate cells often forming vascular channels filled with red Hood cells. In occasional areas, these cells are closely spaced and form large sheets of streaming cells. \The various sized and spindled to stellate cells have a moderate amount of finely vesicular to fibrillar amphophilic cytoplasm, one or two oval to fusiform hyperchromatic nuclei with uniformly staining chromatin and multiple prominent nucleoli. Mitotic figures are rare. A few neutrophils are diffusely scattered throughout the * mass. There are occasional small foci of bright yellow fine granu lar pigmented material and occasional macrophages which contain various sized golden brown intracytoplasmic granules. There are two to four mitotic figures per HPF (x 400). ' .» Comments: Neoplastic fat cells extend to the margins of the one mass. • •* j y#- Sumtiary:1. Lipoma 2. Fibrosarcoma Rodney K. Frank, DVM RKF:jw Report: Tele_ _ _ _ Written 121221^^ Addendum I. What Ara Lawn Cara Chamicals and Haw Ara Thay Uaad? Chemicals used on lawns are pesticides ar\6 fertilizers. Lawn care pesticides are substances used by man to control pests, primarily destructive insects, fungi and weeds, while fertilizers are plant nutrients to help the grass—and any other plants present—to grow. Most lawn care pesticides are “general use" products^- the federal Environmental Protection Agency (ERA) con siders them safe for use by anyone who follows label directions. However, some types of lawn products are "restricted use" substances. They are only sold to and used by "certified applicators.” persons who satisfy ERA and state training requirements. For "restricted use" pesticides the label instructions alone are nor consid* ered adequate to assure safe and proper use. Herbicides are used to kill weeds and are the class of pesticides most often applied to lawns. Weeds are “plants growing out of place ”—where they are not wanted. Bluegrass growing in a bentgrass golf green would oe considered a weed. Conversely, bentgrass in a bluegrass lawn is a most objectionable weed. Yet each grass is excellent for its particular purpose. Herbicides can be selective, killing one type of plant but not injuring another. The widely used lawn herbicide 2.4-0 controls broadteaf weeds like dandelion and plan tain but does not harm most established perennial grasses. Nonselective herbicides like glyphosate kill all plants in a lawn, so they can be used before reseeding lawn areas that nave been overrun by undesirable per ennial grasses. Phenoxy herbicides are plant hormones that control broadleaf weeds by disrupting the plants' normal growth processes. Spraying, if done properly, usually provides better v^eed control than spreading dry herbi cide. so spraying is often tl le method preferred by com mercial lawn care companies. Insecticides control nuisance insects which damage turfgrass or otherwise disrupt a lawn. Grubs are the larvae of beetles such as Japanese beetles. May bee tles (June bugs), chafers, and billbugs that damage lawns by feeding on grass roots. The damage is most evident m the spring and fall when grub-infested turf can easily be pulled up because the roots have been cut by the chewing insects. Unlike the common herbicides, some insecticide formu lations (generally the higher concentrations) are classi fied for restricted use only by certified applicators. Because humans and insects share certain biological similarities, chemicals lethal to insects can also be injuri ous to humans if the latter are exposed to sufficient amounts.' Fungicides are used to control fungus diseases of turf. II. Are Lawn Care Chemicals Safe*? Fertilizers are not pesticides and they generally are not considered toxic substances. This appraisal is probably accurate, but users of fertilizers should still use care in handling them, for instance, to avoid eye exposure and to prevent access by children. Clearly, fertilizers are not entirely risk-free substances. Nevertheless, recent con cerns have been raised about pesticides, not fertilizers, so the remainder of this booklet will focus on these materials. Unlike most other substances used by man. pesticides are designed to kill pests and must be toxic to the pests in order to work. A few lawn care pesticides are toxic to nearly all animal and plant life, such as fumigants used to eliminate nematodes prior to replanting grass in an infested area. Most lawn care pesticides, however, are relatively specific because their primary toxic effects are directed only to target species. For example, under nor mal conditions of use. phenoxy herbicides kill most broadteaf plants but do not adversely affect grasses, insects, or rodents. Toxicity to animals, plants, or humans can be acute or chronic. Acute toxicity refers to the damage a sub stance can do as a result of a sing/e exposure to rela tively large amounts of the material. Chronic toxicity describes the ability of a substance to cause damage as a result of many repeafedexposures during a pro- longed period of time to relatively /ow levels of the mater nal. Toxicity can result from dermal (skin) contact, inges tion (oral), or inhalation. Table 1 presents the four categories used to describe the acute toxicity of pesti cides. Eye exposure to some chemicals may be poten tially hazardous, but eye damage is usually due to the local irritant properties of the substance rather than its systemic toxicity. Acute toxicity of any given pesticide depends upon the inherent toxicity of the substance as well as the amount (dose) and the test organism receiving it. The oral or oeimal dose of a substance capable of causing death (lethal dosej in fifty percent (50%) of a group of labora tory animals is called the LD^. For inhalation toxicity, lethal dose measurements are given in units of air con centration such as milligrams per liter (mg.'l) leading to the designation LCu. Although the L0« and LC^ are crude measures of acute toxicity and different species of animals may have different susceptibilities to a sub stance. they provide a scale by which the acute human toxicity of a substance can be roughly estimated. The LOw is usually expressed as an amount of substance administered divided by the weight of the animal (usu ally rat. mouse or rabbit) tested: for example, milligrams of substance per kilogram of body weight (mg/kg). The /owerthe LD„ or LC» value, the more toxic the material is to the test organism. When they are diluted with water tor application according to label directions and applied to turf, most lawn care pesticides would fall in the least toxic category IV and pose virtually no hazard. Chronic toxicity arises from long term or repeated expo sure 10 a substance and ngam depends on the amount and lest organism, but it also depends on the duration of exposure to the toxic agent. Chronic effects can range from relatively mild irritation to serious, life-threat- ening disease 0^ Table t Categori«s of Toxicity Categories of Acute Toxicity Required on LOw l0«LC« Categories the Label Oral mg/kg Dermal mg/kg Inhalation mg/1 1 — Highly Toxic DANGER — Skull and crossbones POISON 0 thru 50 0 thru 200 0 thru 0.2 II — Moderately Toxic WARNING from 50 thru 500 from 2(X) thru 2.000 from 0.2 thru 2 III —Slightly Toxic CAUTION from 500 thru 5.000 from 2,000 thru 20.000 from 2.0 thru 20 IV - Relatively Non-toxic CAUTION greater than 5,000 greater than 20,000 greater than 20 Adapted from 40 Cmtoo/Fadafa/H#9«ilaftona162.10(h}(1) Diazinon Particular lawn care pesticides have been criticized recently due to alleged health hazards. The insecticide diazinon was linked to the death of 700 geese at a Long Island, New Ybrk golf course. The same pesticide reportedly caused human illness at an apartment com plex in Fife. Washington. In both cases the insecticide may not have been applied according to label instruc tions by not being "watered-in ’* properly. Because of ^^“S^ances like these. ERA proposed a ban on golf ^ \rse and sod farm use of the insecticide.*' 2,4-D The association of the herbicide 2.4-dichlorophen- oxyacetic acid (2.4-D) with non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL), a type of lymphatic cancer, has beer, examined through various epidemiologic (population) studies of agricultural workers.**"* Despite many prior studies of cancer risks associated with agriculture.*' there is still no explanation for the higher rates of NHL incidence for agricultural .occupations than found in the general United States population. Each year about 7.000 to 8.0CX) new NHL cases are diagnosed. Although the cause of NHL is not yet proved, there is substantial evi dence that it is viral in origin.** Based on the result of one recent study.** ERA notified all registrants of 2.4-0 products that it was "considering initiating a Special Review" for these pesticides accord ing to FIFRA regulations (40 Code of Federal Regula tions part 154.7). The agency said the study appeared well designed and its "conclusions are supported by the data."** However, one of the conclusions was that excess NHL was "associated with the use of phenoxy- acetic acid herbicides." specifically 2.4-0.** yet data col lected directly from subjects or next of kin concerned ^ e number of days per year and years duration of /rbic/de use. not 2.4-0 specifically. As such, the study - Combines 2.4-0 use with that of other herbicides like triazines. amides, trifluralin. and "non specified" prod ucts. Chlorothalonil The turf fungicide chlorothalonil (Oaconil 2787») has tentatively been linked to the September 1982 death of a 30-year-old Navy lieutenant. He was presumably in good health, but after three days of playing goif at a course near his Arlington, Virginia home he became ill. Less than two weeks after entering the hospital, he died of a heart attack. His affliction was diagnosed as toxic epidermal necrolysis (scalded skin syndrome), a serious disease with symptoms resembling a second degree burn: loos ening and peeling of large areas of the skin with swelling and extreme tenderness About 20 percent of patients die from the disease, but in cases of sudden, spontane ous (probably idiopathic) origin like this, the mortality rate is 50 percent.** The fungicide chlorothalonil had been sprayed on the golf course and. according to the Navy, residues of the fungicide were detected on the lieutenant ’s shoes and golf ball. The Navy pathologist ’s report concluded that the fungicide was responsible for triggering the disease. Various orescription drugs have been suggested as causing the disease but "no one has provided any direct immunologic evider^ce for drug allergy."** Bacterial infections, rather than drugs, are related to most cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis, and pesticide allergy had not been suggested before as a cause of the disease. The Dacoml 2787* label notes that the product may "produce temporary allergic effects" in applicators, but the lieutenant ’s illness was far more severe. A thorough investigation of this case could pro vide information to confirm or refute the link to the fungi cide application: however, a "wrongful death" lawsuit by his widow against the country club and the fungicide manufacturer has made such an investigation difficult. Pesticide critics and defenders alike agree that this case IS a very unusual one. but determining whether and. if CO. how the fungicide caused toxic epidermal necrolysis would take some considerable time and effort. The manufacturer denies any connection between the fungi- cide and the disease, pointing to more than 15 years of safe experience with the chemical and its exposure to millions of golfers without any similar reactions. Critics, on the other hand, use this case to emphasize the haz ards of a'l lawn care products, even though fungicides like chlorothalonil are hardly ever used on home lawns.o Summary In summary, for each of the three pesticides discussed atX3ve. the scier.ufic issues need careful consideration. Despite extensive experience and scientific studies on chlorothalonil and 2.4-0. critical scientific information appears to be missing or incomplete at the present time. Is this an example of a major cause for alarm? Are the American people at serious risk because lawn care chemicals and other pesticides require further data to check certain aspects of their safety for humans and the envirorvnent? This point is raised by the 1986 Govern ment Accounting Office (GAO) reports on pesticides. \ o o Comihan hetUdde linked to caQcer Eipoaifc to a conuaoa btrbkide sig't* iMaattf bicfcaMt the rU of non- HodfUali lymphoiM (NHLX according loa National Cancer Instltula report The broMHeif plant Ullet a phenoeyher- bicide called Zd-dkhlorophencHjfBcetlc acid (24 D), ta one of the active ingre* dienta in Agent Orange, wed during the Vielnaniiinc Swedieh reaearcbera reported in 1979 and BSIaaaociationt between phenony herbicide uae and not only NHL but aiao two other cancera, aofl-tiaaue aarcona and Hodgkinb diaaaae In the car rent atudy headed by Sheila K. Hoar and re port^ In the Sept 5 Jourmal or tns AanncAif MnlcAL AssoaAnoN. only the NHLcobaecdonwaa found. . Hoar and hefcolleagueatradted^own all caaea of the three cancera diagnmed between^ and 1982 in vrhite Kanaaa own, andtpieetloned the patienu or their aur vtvora ahout occopatioti and ex- poaorc to herbiddea. lib further check theherbidde informalfcin, the reaenreh- era Interviewed local pexMde lup- pliera. I When the rea earc hera compared the herhidde expoauic among the cancer paiioim and among agenmiatihed trhilg men from the general Kanaas population, they found that the Incidence^ NHL, but not of the other two cancera,* inaeaaed with incfoaaed expoaure to 24-a The more expo^ to thal particular herbiddi they fou^ the irealer thf riak •the Incidence of ^HL among farm- era cxpoaed20dayadr more fwyearwaii afat timea that of the general population, vrhile thoae who uaed it aix toilO dqra per yearwefcatLStimeitlieria^Thegreat- eat danger waa to people vrho had han dled the chemical extmiaively people who mtamd or applied H were at eight timea the riak. The atudy did not ahow any increaaed riak among backyard gardenera. can! aay they're at riak.* notea Hoax Iwt thereb reaaon for cautioo and concern. I think when we know anything to car- dnogcnkwehaveioconaiderthatevena low doae nmy be hmardoua.* The r^ort haa aparbed concern in the federal govemmenL Loto Roaai of the En vironmental Protection Agency «»ho monHora the age^b 24-D program, aaya. •^'re going to review the entire . atudy Wb fed that the concluaiona in the report are wdl-founded. Itb of otavioua c oncern.* la the meantime, ahe recom- menda that fanaera and backyard gar denera follow labd inatructiona care fully wnor protect ive clothing and handle 24-0 with caution. The report to evidently being taken ae- . Mawf offhewookcondnuadonA 7^4 SCIENCE NEWS Volume 130 September 13, 1986 Narnnofm^mkeontUnmdtnmp. 187 • rioualy by the peatidde Induatry aa welL ' Representaiivea of a 13<ompany Ujk force of 2.4-0 producera metvdth the re searchers late last «reek to discuss the study: David Oietx. a spokesperson ter the task force, says, *Wb're going to clearly pay attention to the finding.* Because of questions regarding ex posure levels and other aspeett of the previous atudy by Swedish reaearchera. the task force disputed those findings. But the current study aaya Oleix, to more credible The news tani alt hid: fiSirST ing to Oletx • the overall incidence of NHLamongfarraers who wore protoct lvo equipment «ma not as greatly devaled. "That for us to interesting and probably good." he says. But further analj^s of the amount of 24-0 uae b, the protective equipment wearers could show an expo sure-related risk. Hoar says. The study to also of relevance to peo ple exposed to Agent Orange, aa her bicide sprayed during the Vietnam «»ar in vdial was then South Vietnam. 24-0 «»as one of the hvo active Ingredients used in the .herbicide: the other was 2AS-lri- chidrophcnol (245-Tl Operation Ranch Hand, a study of L200 Vletiiim vefSamT cof^ted by the U.S Air Force, did not I the study to re says Hoax Ac> corging to a Veterans Administration spokesperson, the Vk plans on reviewing thecurrent study lodetermine if Vietnam veterans exposed to the herbicide in the course of duty and who develop NHL are due service-related disability benefits. Animal studies have shown that Cham- teal contaminants called dioxins, pro duced during the manufacture of 2AST: are toxic as vrnll as csrcfnogittic Ra- saarch on the health affects on Agsnl Orange has locussd on one particular 245ToootaminaaL wHh relalhmly lillla Arnold Schectex whoae studtos havt shown measuiable levels of dkadns in lha fat tiamie of people in industrallaed countries (SN:7/0/8S^A26X says that the new study ought to focus attention on vrhat componM in the 24-0 herbicide to causing problems. *WbVe written olL perhaps erroneously 24-D l* he says. *The key question.* aqys Schsetex a professor of preventive medidne at the State Untocfsity of New Mark in BinghHU- ton. *to: Is the problem in 24-0 or la a conlamioaal724-Ohaaolhardianinsthat have been considered feas toxic than tht nmebcanoundin smoue and ash from munidpal and industrial inefamfesaJLir a ifey menptmi UUdygrca^ lu • Kansas farmers, then we must give much ' more serious consideration to their toxfe ‘ health effects.* -‘JiSiBmntr /©•V‘‘.' Chamcd lawn "'can*' TheDan&rs Of Lawn Care jOAK JO«D%H*S DOG » deacL The yOMC Lab inigbl have been a chtuQiiiai hac he bved. But unlfte his par* ealB. Vehrec voa’lhaveUiai chance. Nei> thet «1 hm sister. She was puisooed, too. JordM dama her pets were poi- looed whea pesckades sprayed by a lawa service woricinc nearby drifted onto her property. Vkiiesses supfXMt her cbim. and an autopoy report slnws that the pets werc-poisnnec by an organopiiosphaie, a 0TOUP of cheiricals many hwn care com* peoiei use. It'ua sUxy ahai in recent years has be- coaae all too hixiiliar. A lawn care com pany ootnes around pronaaing chemical nirades. doesa and moves on. A few days ater. a pH is dead or a family the ** hi.“ Fonhe Jordans of ForeaUnJIe. Md.. the deatl of one pet and the flnesa B Y J A Y BUR N I- T T of another brought about a realization that something is bighthifiy wrong when peo ple risk s^ty and go^ health (or weed- hee lawns. And as the Jo''dans qukJdy discovered, their experience is no iso- bted iobdeot. Qaims against chemical lawn care companies are on the rise na tionwide. Trouble is brewing wuhio the nation’s $2.8 bdbon lawn care industry. And while many bwn care professionals blatns cm- rent business woes on higher costs (largely a resuh of uicrea.*^d liaknlity cov erage). unfavorable weather patterns and increased competition, many expects be lieve the companies' biggest concern should be the chemicals they use. Cootroverey surrmmding chemical use has ootored dm business outlook of many in the industry. Now. instead of seeing green, a growing number of lawn service • perators arc seeing red. It's a siiuatioo that ’s forcing many lawn pros to make Ug changes in the way they operate. A recent survey of kmit care profes sionals conducted by Lowh Senicing magazine showed 48% of those respond ing believe public concern over lawn chemicals is affecting the way they do busineis. Some 64% said customers (or their neighbors) have confronted apphea- tors with concerns about pesticide safely, and 33% have experienced cancellations as a restdl of what they termed "had pub licity.'’ Stdl, it’s esiimaled that in some areas one out of every four suburban lawns is serviced by a lawn chenucai com pany. CheiaLawn, the nation's largest lawn care a^mpany. saw busuiess drop 8% in Buffalo. N.Y.. during a 1986 lawn pesti cide controversy. A local jc Uvim gioup. HELIMKelp Elinunate Lawn fWicxles). was formed in the summer of IU85 to ed ucate people about chemical pesticide dangers aid promote safe bwn care alter natives. Vhe group, founded by Builalo housewife Karen Bbke alter biie .md oth ers in the comniumiy began sufferuig sc vere allergic reactions to ctx:aucal bwn sprays, pies>ured si,«ie and U«cal 11(00.115 to ifiiroducc legislation requiiin(> lawn care coiiuanK's to give prii.r wainutg aiW, post sigai lielore spray uig. WHh fegisbtioii pendiiig. Cheml iwn voluntarily agreed to comply vith HELP'S demai^. The company als an nounced three new bwn care options tow avaibble rxationwide. These inclu e a "fertilizer only" option, a "Uinited" les- tidde pcogram that involves spraying ms- ticides only when a problem is evs iot, and a "dry option" protp^ using gi m- lar fertiluers and pesticides to re uce tirobfems associated with chemical t ift. tnts^lnwn has also stepped u( ad vance nbUtic.uion and post-appbc *joo posting, and IS redesigning invoices t list chemicals applied and the prroentai 1 at which they were used. Additionally the comiMy ku suspended the use ts the herbicide 2,4-D —a widely used 1 sed kiMer that a National Cancer Inst ute study has Inked to increased inciden sol lymphatic cancer —until huiher testii | of Uie produa is completed. HELP members say they are pie sed with ChemLawn ’s cooperation and V i un- tary nnoves. but, says Bbke. the cha (km’t go (ai enough. Whie dry ap| ca tions and kinited pesticide use may re duce human exposure, she argues hat they don’t protect wildlife or rei jce groundwater contamination. Stih. the changes are an encouraging sign hat grassroots activism can make a di I'er- ence. Encouraging, too. is the passag of "right to know’’ legtabtion. whicb re quires that bwn service custoroen be told which chemkab aril be used on 1 wir bwns. In addition, right-u>-know leg sb- tioo in some slates provides that infoi na- linn on chemical-rebied health eff cts and precautions br avaibble 00 req esi and appear in clear view on labels, uid that property be posted with war ing signs for 72 hours fodowiiyg chemica' ap- plicalions. Some of the new bws also reqiwe I .at. if requested, customers and their ne gh- bors be warned 4H hours in advanc of sprayings *a» precautions can be take 10 nununize exposure. Lawmakers in M ry- Vifid. Kbide Uliind, Massachusetts, I in- nesota and Iowa luve approved righi to- know legislation, and oflMials in Conncdicui. Now York. Michigan. lUi oi.> IS n IS U1 Cl to 9—i sD tu 3 0 ‘ 0:1 I r- y* ; Sethis rose fr anee(7m afreecatak)^ m Snip lMi«l lor todivM m kmbuekmttagtiwm^ m «iriiifgiWii;M»lna.Mt m litM. id tUwr iowwi m fimi, m AlBteaRsloUo(«9«ftpM« M aivise! Ud ID Amatinig IbM, m P.O.fimfl m S0Niii,CASm W P.O. fim W. DipHtiiwni mi. 93066. Or (^luMw Ti^.fTrn ~Rm e$t9kiitke4 • l$J9 !■' --V » ' ?■'■> V I .Ui>. I (M%MCHiJUSi! MOavOMAMUa fn mmm •* *«wu tAItt r*M* «MA mtmm •§ M ■ • ta ^ »iil‘ ■ • niiii'' V mrnmm apn —a mrnitmmt Mill* ;r I laM ••! •«»>••) i*. umruiXT IAK8 • I totll twm. UMtM and Ohio ar: coosid^ring sunihui mea sures. No bciger s tl buswess as usuaJ in the bwn care indisiry. Tie chemical compa nies have been pul on notice. ORGANIC APPRCWCH Amid the chemical controversy, a new breed oC lawn care prcfessioaai is emerg- «g. Heahh aad safety ooocems. oupied with growing evidence swppimg crgaoic bwo care pcactices. Inw led an ever- increasing number of operators lo em brace a natunl approach to iawa cire Mike Merser is oae of them- Until eight years mp. the Charlestown R.I.. haihfaper rax what se descnbei as a ''chemical intensive" kwncare business. But in 1979, lAer years of observng the eflects of chemicab o-j golf courses and lawns serviced by tia company, be awHched to organic naethoda. "What stared to clui^ my mind was the poor track record cf the chemicals be ing used in agriculture and turf msnsge- ment," says the 38-yiur oid ownerof the Org;^ Landicape Co. "A bt of tfie in secticides, herbicides and (ungiddes 1 wed in the 'sOa and »ify '70s a.e re stricted or banned novr. 1 began to malite that using chenbals se: up a viciouacyde hi the lawns C was carmg for." Memer sa^s that ri^ough his initiri results horn cKmicals were good, le be gan noticing tlatcli ancf dnease pro-ilenis after about Oree years of treatments. Those problems wouhl lead to inenased use of p^Dckes. "In high-nunagemeIt lawns suxh as those I worked on. the soil is neser in good condlikM," he says. "Chemicals wipe out the sad's ife fcrces—the bdhons of beneScial nicroorganisms tint dgest thatch and produce beritfay sod." Oganic proJucta. on the other nod. feed the sod. Not suipriahigly. tiry’re the heart of M^mer's new bwn care pro gram. "Comfsnt is Uk healthiest thing there is to noiLish a laiMi." Memer »a>*8. "Whh it. you re not coly adding nrtri- ents. you're al<o adding the beneficiil mi- aoorganisins lhat help build good s.nl." Memer has found tint once J tsfslmcots are stopped it takes a mini- nun of three years to restore the bobgi* C4l lealth of the soil. This b done tn* first d thatching a troubled lawn, then fertiliz ing wice a year with a blend of o ’ganic nitrents—fish, leather or blmxl meal for nJtmgen. crushed rock phosphates for piofphorus, and greensand for petansium —fdbwed by topdressing the lawn with compost in the f^. AAhough Memer purchases the or gan; feniuer bleed he uses on cus- toners' lawns, the com|osl he uses is vninied up in his own backyard. Horse, ccw sheep, chicken and rat^il manure n cclected boro 24 local larms, and fish scraps are hauled in from a bcal seafood psDCissor. His landscaping business sup- phesplenly of leaves and grass dippings toadd to the enormous pilM. "Orxe a lawn n in good shape, ycu can gel great results from using noihuaj but 'ciiifost as a topdressing." Memer ex- pUin. "Contpotl provides a lawn with everifthing in just the right amount Mismer fias put in hundreds of new lawns throughout New England uring tiis natunl approach to lawn care. Orce a lavn b established, his company will pro vide awn care to any customers reqijest- ing il. foBowing the same basic rejiiwn he r4CO{nmenfe for homeowners doing the work tbemseK’es—20 pounds uf an orfuic (ertflizer blend per 1.000 sewi'e fetl af lawn twice « year, phis a lopdiess- ing cf compost in the fall. Of course praper mowing and watering must be pQisnlained. .Additionally. Memer tjeats nev iawns with milky spore disease to cojtcol Japanese beetle grubs, and he liszsif soil tests indicate the need. "At hwig as I maintain a lawn, I guaran tee h for a Izfelinte against insects and dis ease. ’ he ^ys. "Initially my pm^ran; co8tw a bii more than chemical tieal- ments. but in the long run it’s much more reasoiable. The mOky spore treatmeri b needed only once to lake care of Japaeese beetle grubs, and other pt-sts won't le a prcM«m in a well niaimamcd bwn." Moeover. a healthy lawn should cboke out nrost we«*ds. "l.'nioriuailely." .-lays Mwofr, ''inosl j>cople tiav** tv , n cirA tioier to ’ ' PbunpMiMipSiwjKr,TOOi.S.f t' O L mm m CM na Wt«mmm Mm erswaar.’*w an ■! mm mm • MUr. l». .. vw CM M« em mmm w to m% m 30^ FR|I THU! o^'?. MO OMwavfow-wo laattaeir wiu taa it»i :n WSM coupon StSSA m mm ID!.fV . lUtIUl ssxvur* n V9S ^Wmc Mud mm immIiM facte • *-* rLANKK-MOLDCfi.SAWMC dwaili aSMii <>tel «iw MWt«U. Cdi__I I Leaves-Aw Gutter Guards WWiNta tnmS«ML tiiid UuiH* k a yc fiU. 4 ft In||UmvC«) lAhMJU tMOwMiditpm m rtcMk < Sm SoU imW MCMti to Itot (lU M rntm mf IStOMUAVOy Kuisman C9ini)any a.<crRoji) Oejl A41 f»*y PAW? 0 (?i5) ^ o it tley have any weeds. We try to break tel niind^. After aD. weeds are just heito and wikMewen. When 1 point that out; most people don't wony about them att^aoie. “Heakby sod yields healthy plants, and the way to get healthy sod u by adding naturally occvmng nutrients. Let the sod’s niaroorganisms do their job.” Dr. Eliot loberts, director of the Lawn \\\ \ CIlKMirAl S AND 'lOl’R IIliAI.TlI Akhoofli UW sindies are jieto. te Jkiional Caaoer Institute testing bbontoriM have B lawn care chenarals toad- tone long lewi health eftects. Thesehwe lenu heilti rtebdaiBctB. Imicmd Bile fettOty. fever and infwted seiahivily to wis, BMBeetyten deftrirarirs id stands.- . Detpile arvwato fraa some idde a ppfecteti, no dBoical pesii*’ •idi can he deeamd ootopleleiy safe. llHvme. ftftiral.cfaeBteiideitoplfaktoM orpiiipe.^. •• M hncftappfeed. ;•« rffisnanoelr:'« ' ’fttift: nSflirii and the ndwne PUNGIClDiS^ titMnesa in the chest, and mnsde twitches. Adverse chronic efiecU »• chide changes in motor activity aod mnsde weakness in laboratory tni- eials. Tkere is some evidence of tiaawin -causing birth defects, inckld- ^ nearafaetuvioral effects, in lest an- iate. h las also been found to be lau- tagenic ir some bboraiory teats. Akboujih sifl widely used, tfeasmon hia beeife banned on golf flounes and taf lamu because of hrie bird UDs a ssodsted with it. For eaample. 700 hnnt geeie died from feedhig on a foV opurie k New Yotk where dmanoh teanniih the sldn^ eyes; rwpintoCT teWMtnointes6-r: 'tonhi^ " f. r.* hat faewii^SM lo - :S';®::ss5;--------------- eqoni». ;;V^riliiinih ilnnil in leng^enn pnimal ' •: . t jV . vj jv jc^'^WdOA.-hn hakiidl yM lepoct-ftvwttm 4toBcicn: ■ Sdeoce tod Bnsfth. te ifr CS&SXi!^.. \ nhyh^ lj^ r he team «. Less ihto two* weeks ' hie proper fmetaon of the nervour •' after entering the hospilal. he dbd of a nrrteqiO. Otiisr symptoms of pverpx- posnre incM headaches, foineis, heart attndt. His towss was diagnosed at toxic epidennal necrolysis (scaMed Institute, a jtational organization that pro motes turf cafe.agrees with Menier’s as sessment of the effects of chen^als on soQ. “Every time you disrupt inicroor- gamsms in the sod with large concentra- syinpioms retombling a second de gree bum. r,«.. Many cir^nqchkHSnes. the group of chemicals lo.,nnikk cblorothakunl be longs. can li^e chronic skin rashes from reguttr' ^posure. and have also been found (o-produce nervous sys tem (hsorderh invohring the brain, pe- rg>heral nerves and musdeb. The EFA haodassified benomyt as a possible hunnn cardnogen. Tests have tewn ii qitBrs birth defects ami dtyreas^ coums in laboratory A»bicioi >s t.4-0: nip'.wideljr uted hectietde, which was of the components of Che defaKnl ^hfent Orar«e used in Vietnam, hapowceotiy been hnked with ncnensciLinaideiice of tymphaiic tonoec SkiacsiKMurt as a result of gpOi Im ritoted. w anite delayed jKOBww ayileoi dwtoge in huroani. to the eyes, jtewt aaM tepfra tory tract are other posipde efleetfr. la general, however. to be rapdiy excreted absorptioo. T Doiff-ato ihilficMbrly sensitive to Z4-D, tod Uw^ are instances where they have eijpdrieaced severe toxic lea item’ ftnndnpir wafltog acrqpa kwns fotowintf kppGcalioii. The chemical it used in more than 1.500 weed-ldBing producU sold over the counter. ChemLswn. llie nation’s hugest lawn care opmpany, hu ce- centJy suspended to.use of the herbi- cide until frirther studies are oompletetl. -y ff ' y i SgS 2t IKAMCGAHKM^i OREGON SPRING - Out most popular Tomato • Tho oaitlast hilt-si: i looMlo to tipon In youf pardon. Dot rod. sueculaol Isrpa lomaloas ara aura to pisass- SpMwJ oNar — to aaada and our fiaa catalog SOc Saatf tor our FREE Garden Cafatof ott^rimg o«ar SM ltop«l«te Nai* and Plewor Va/toflaa. Nichols Gardon Nursaiy Albany. Oragon 07321 IM It to liMr Md Miirt Mbs* ki bi^ . - • « devMtgJi cht way dieimcal sjatcmi cto. OipoR ntthoda nake lawe. Tin •tot tht^to tint fMt bf. am tod toaa yntotoioaali «• switf towaid lilt !£I ^ tooottfag to Steven Zita, a Cknis Calf., htdicaper who hst year itotod Bado^ Urtan Gaideang Stu- vket (BUGS). Through BUGS. Zien ioyt to bring tngrther organic hwa care aalioowide ^ provide »• farnaikM to anytoe nicreated it orguae tothodi. The CaHtemia hadtraper is wrahi^ to estabidi a certification Im caic operatcrs iaieteited in practic* ‘tegergafic tteliicds. Soito chefloicdly orieated lawa care predig aitaads are aaritchixig to na»*i>rwf^ we advocate as a lesult ol the high coal ol iafafity insttranoe that di^mirai appfica- ton must carry.'' says Zaen. “But aiott of thooe who simtch are hooetOy ooa- oeioed about the safety of the products they've been usini. They reahxe there's and want to do aomeUiag about it." ZieapainUtoa ncest study cooducted by the Ameskaa Couocd on Sdeooe tod Heakb as an exanvde of how the aidiistry aa a whole feels about the issue of efaes^ cil use. The study concludes that hwn care chenicals *Vhen correctly and le gally used" pose no hazard to human h^th. “Such claims can’t be made, yet d s beiag done." says Zien. Lawn care oormaniet argue the efatmirab t^ use ve “sab" because ptopm aimed at trautog and evahating wcj uav arc saw oecauw they 're regsiered wkh the EPA, But ac- totoWf to the General Accounting Of fice's (GAO) fiodnis on the EIVt's ban- I Sweet, mild I andmea^... M aBtO, hrtfltU ml tllnUifMa iHwatlaj* IB?' KS I IIIII I ______________________ oauwe Bteg of peslica:* regolaliDiis. not only ia RffBtralioaooparinteeof safety, hot no Ptotidde can be deemed safe untd letting is congdete. Pesticides are. after all. chenacals deaigaed to Idl biolo^ or- Despite applicators' claims that the chemicab they use are eitremely diluted s^lm low toncky. the New York Suie Pesticide Applicator Training Manual states that chronic peatiride poasoniag “■ ^ repeated anal m lethal doses over a lo^ period of safen for years." sqrs Zien. T don I try ti • convince people chenne b aredanguoia. though. What I try loo o- vmce them of inaiead b that we do 't know enough about their eiecta toad*»- cale using them. Why ftodie if tfaeie 1 w ahenutivesr' OONSLfMER EDUCAJION Sim 1972 the ElWba^ been condbict- mg berth and safety evaluarinna of active ingredmncs in its registered pesticide nroAicts. Itemarkably. none of the nearly 600 evahatioos had been completed as of ^ GAO's 1986 report. As a result, n- fonnalioa on the long tem clvorac ef fects of pesticide exposure—cancer, ste- nhly and birth defects—is seriously beking. By the EPA's own admbsion it wil take at least 20 mare years to fil iMs dau gap. No evidence currently exisis to TtotaaMmeuagebbeiiwespaua d bythe Nflionii(:oofiliDoArtmattfaeM *- use of Pesticides (NCAhfP), a Whs - mgton^haaed consumer pinteclion P actoe in orpniamg grass-roots effans •• reform pesticide laws. “Too often, homeownen wB reteh f r chemical heitickltfs aa thdr first choi s for weed control in Uvms." says NCAM > spokMman Tom Oates. "There may 1 ^uficatjoo for a fanner touseanh^:- ode when his crops and livelihood tfepei I on k. hut k's absurd for other people • i put themselves at imk for an emenAi- r CLIW-M-MAIL E I 1988 Earl May SPRING CATALOG m fuU color froin cover lo cover. You'll find your favorite vegetable and flower seeds, plants, roses glads, rnums. fruits and berries. Also, lips on pltoiing. growing, h^esiing and cookim. Tools i and pel iiems. tool Send for your FREE copy today 1 fimdir Earl Mgy Srtd 4b Iwaary LB Ogpl ISI-2Q IsaMSIlfiJI Stats---------................................... -------I I, f/om# Henting Hmodquartmn to, thm Nstion Since 1919 * ***** ' ^ .... - . & n KitkiM kealtk for « picture* **ftepcr Mlectiao of fniaeo. the fight fcitaty , mmMo eatoriii. wkee tkcfe are acnaiUe altereativea —***» Sbeia Daar. a faenaed bad. acape eooinctor aod imcgnted peat - -j-------OPIf) speciaiat baaed io ^obefer* Calf., aajra one of tbe beat- keptaecntaiotbebvBcafeadttatryto- dapbtlaab ’apeffBcllFleaaibletoiDibi- tiiD a heabftv. attnctxve b«a «fitb fitsb « BO nee of peetkides. g.J)fmrSt. En^ m^lM V^: JMS.FMiaSt NY USGO ffeMiCareoiiGwuicIlIi^^ >.- ^^le?f CbBaerM0;1»m^; • iOipanlelMidMiveCo/ •'' •!' Countrr Dnve Xeivo«.Rf<»ia^. . . aed cboobac tbe groper aaoe er aafoodpnclicae b aCandud teita oe bm mainlfMBcet*' waft Daar. *‘Wheo Iheae pnctioeB an peat probbma rwely beooie a problen. Uafortuoately. tbe Lc^ awM 10 have been tbrofTB Old apd fvod aeoae baa bees dbpboed bp rdbnce os qaidi-fia treatiBeiita.'* ' Daar'a approach to bam cace pcofaleaia b ooe prooMted by Berkeley ’s Bio* hteyb Resomoe Cemer (BIRC), a 000* proil oorpofatba s*i6 directs. Formed m 1979 to provide h^ytit oe tbe least taoDC Bketboda if ^ : peats, BUtC baaea itaworkc ihr.^oc^^iesofIPM,a proceta that co. I'^s wbob ccosys* tern b detenob ing tbe beat method of peat coatroL *”The foal of SB IPM propram b to aup- pceaa peal popablioos bebw levels that cause ecoDoxnic, aesthetic or medical n- jury.” she says. “IPM strategies don’t dbrupt the eoviroiurcot. A muhber of tactics *re bte^ted to solve pest prob lems aricb a inbiiDum rehanoe on pesb- ddbs. Unhke standard pest coolrol pn>- praois. ireatments aren ’t made according to a predetennined calendar schedule. They ’re made ody when and where roon* iloritig has indicated a pest wig cause problems. You look at what's gumg on and then decide whsl approach to lake.** NWWHAT? Public coQcern over chemical lawn care iiM resulted b setbacks f<^ an industry tint only a few years afo seemed beaded for iiuitless growth. That prowih con* Ibaes, but ai a BHicb abwar pace. Indus* try bi^ CbemLawD reported a 2S% b> crease in busbeat yearly until 1964. Sbce tben. fnowth has been limited to just 3%. The reason? Increased competi- tkm? Poasbly. Public auiety? Probably. The sobtioo for redudog tbb andc^ and the heahb and eovironmenlal prob- foms bom which it arises is obvious-*- increased reliance on org^ bwn care methods. After ah, cbemiral bwn care (fees seem a contradirtfon b terms. ^ JU: r Rioccoli: America s Rising Star r* • ilMni CkriMwn W7 * 0'» mit aU-M« r—HM »aa daicas «f cnlb. trofo help *l&ca«kl«n get•j. ^OWjANIC GARDENING' ForYoursdf \Y/h aot ght foane ‘Jn gi/l It bb Ghhsoiu*’ Hhj // usr OBGMK GAMDlSm a7 tear torn. Bmy iaueisSilM wkb YttktatiagaiaJag aews, ttps aadbeasL Coaieaf . ■. ttm__ ricasc Mart an iNM**>ear (li iNSueat) >ib>rriplKin m OHCAMC GAKDlMNti magaainr aImj, pirate send ate a free cup>* uf "Mave a Saiural Chrbimas '8T ONE t EAR—ONLY 49.9' ___ UtIMILxs___\H « _ * n\ M%.l — . .. ___________f,r .» ______ .S(^ m* niKM^ rRWk Urli o4! «iw Jk-r Lunu . I. 1‘IK 51089.8 TO: Mayor and City Council FROH: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato DATS: May 10, 1989 SUBJECT: Joint Planning Commission/Council Meeting - Navarre ISSUE - Rettirder of the upcoming joint meeting on June 1, 1989, at 6:00 P.M. (box lunches will be provided). O cc: John Shardlow, Dalgren, Schardlow, Uban Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator Planning Commission Members 51089.9 TO: Mayor and City Council ^ FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato^ljjj^ DATE: May 12, 1939 SOBJECT: Board of Review Reconvene - May 24, 1989 ISSUE - Reminder to Council of the establishment of May 24, 1989 for the reconvening of the Board of Review. INTRODUCTION - Based on the number of persons in attendance a reconverieH 3ate was established for May 24th. It is anticipated that this meeting will commence at 7 P.M. and will take approximately 2 hours. The Assessor will present his recommendations on each property and any residents in attendance can express their concerns regarding this value. It is anticipated at this point that persons who attend will be in one of three groups; a. ) Persons who were in attendance at last meeting who desii'e to present additional information. b. ) Persons who had been contacted but not reviewed prior to last meeting and who ware advised they could attend the May 24th meeting once they had been reviewed by the Assessor. They maybe present for the first time if they desire to present information the the Board. c. ) Persons who had not contacted the Assessor prior to the Board of Review and who just show at the meeting. Persons in categories 1 and 2 will have been reviewed by the Assessors. It is expected that the majority of people in attendance will be those who did not appear at the May 11, 1989 meeting or just left their name and property identification number. It is anticipated 25-30 people will be in attendance but that it should go relatively quickly as each of those properties will have been visited by an Assessor and their recommendation will be before you. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by ., that the Council accept the information regardTng the Board ol”Review reconvening date at 7:00 P.M., May 24, 1989. Ayes _, Nays _. cc: Rolf Erickson David Wilde Rita Gudverian 51789.2 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator DATS: May 17, 1989 SUBJECT: Administrator's Information HIGHWAY 12 SAFETY IMPROVEMENT - As noted last time it is antTcipated that MnDOT will be coming forward with a revised plan and specifications. At this point it appears the primary concern expressed as noted in the Attachment, is the realignment of North Brown Road with Virginia. The persons on Virginia Avenue in Long Lake are very concerned about this realignment. Mr. Rebers, as noted in the past, is not in favor of the realignment but could handle it with the development. As this letter is sent to Mr. William Crawford at MnDOT it would be appropriate for the Council to await taking any action. We will be communicating with Mr. Crawford to determine direction, if any, MnDOT is undertaking with regard to this issue. 1972 SHADYWOOD ROAD - Efforts continue to determine if the individual has been actively feeding waterfowl on his property, which he maintains has not been happening. SPRING MANAGER'S CONFERENCE - This years Manager's Conference featured a team of individuals from the Menninger Foundation in Kansas who discussed issues related to group process, mid-life stress, morale, ability to deal with change, and personal relationships. This produced many insights for myself and I am very grateful to the Council for the ability to have attended this meeting. I feel the insights gained will assist in my further efforts to improve my management abilities and in turn benefit the organization. HIGHWOOD STORM SEWER - Staff had hoped to have this included at this meeting, however, one of the neighbors that is key to the project is again out of town. FERNDALE MARSH FIRE - At approximately 22:44 on Tuesday, May 16th the marsh on Ferndale was ignited possibly by arson. Because of the high dense growth in the marsh Wayzata Fire, in whose area this transpired, appropriately called in Long Lake, Plymouth and Minnetonka Fire to protect the various exposures of houses both in Orono and Wayzata. They successfully extinguished the fire with no loss to constructed property. (It is actually helpful for the marsh to have burned off as this will allow new growth to emerge.) CAMP TEKO - As you may be aware Camp Teko has been contemplating the construction of a new building on the site. They are holding a meeting for the neighborhood on May 23, 1989, prior to their submitting an application for the City, which would go through Planning Commission and Council for review as a conditional use permit. SPRING CLEAN DP - This season's spring clean up was again a great success. We filled 8-40 cubic yard, 4-30 cubic yard and 1 - 20 cubic yard containers, 13 single axle dump truck loads of bagged leaves and grass and several appliances. This year appliances were set aside and were picked up by Major Appliance Recyclers of St. Paul. The cost per appliance is $6.00. METRO WASTE/WEEKEND CONSTRUCTION - Construction began again recently on the Orono/Minnetonka Beach interceptor. County Road 51 (North Shore Drive) was clo'^^d for a period of time between Tonakawa Road and Baldur Park Road. Construction is now concentrated on the intersection of Shadywood Road and North Shore Drive near the public boat launch area. Beginning May 19th Shadywood Road from North Shore Drive to Fagerness Point Road will be closed until the weekend of Memorial Day. In order for the contractor to have that work complete and the rudu opened by that wekend he will have to work from daylight to sunset and Saturday and Sunday, May 20th and 21st. 4460 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - At the last meeting an inquiry was made regarding a resident's complaint given to Senator Gen Olson. This was followed-up on and it was an individual with whom we communicated as staff with last summer. The Police department is continuing to monitor the situation in the vacinity. W.M. t?i 5^:•'.ct Ssiginaar Minna^Si^t.A Ds*^ ^r*ni®nfc o-f Tr ir.2por tA^ iari 2055 N, Lltac Dr. noldvn Valley. MN 55422 MU0W|^ I Tem !) nay 1989 Mr. Craw-ford/ W« th» r«iid«nts o-f Virginia Avsnua wish that tho following concerns be Made part of the public record for the MNCOT public hearing held April ZZ, 1969^ for the Trun!< Hig.hwav 12 project. Ue support the portion of the project that proposes the widening of Highway 12 and the use of a raised ccncrste »iedian. »fe do not support the part of your proposal with Virginia Avenue for the fallowing .‘sasons. to Iciest Brown Road 1. The site line will *iot improve if Brown Road is ralocated. It will decrease the site line to the east> making it difficult to see around that surve. Brown Road drivers will not be able to see the traffic signals or be able to judge whether the traffic is stopped or moving. 2. Because of the closer pro::imitv of this proposed intersection, we believe we will experienis an incrsase in noise polluition created by die adaed traffic. 3. He believe that with the increases of traffic generated on Highway 12 In the future and with the proposed intersection of Brown and Virginia, that our property values will decrease. As an isolated neighborhood of this City of Long Lake, we need your help to protect our privacy and our properties. 4. Tf the proposed intersectiun goes according to plans, we as residents feel we will ctp^rience a.. *.-,cri?sB5 ir. traffic i.. boblj JiiuiCtions on Virginia Avenue ever though there 12 "Do Not £:..:ar ’ signs on the iiCi th ^nd. This sign is frequentl/ d Is/.vgard-ad b; ..idin/ non-r esi Jej*t s. Th.e Police department is fully aware of this problem already. With a real posibility of increased traffic on Virginia, we must si sc consider the safety of the many small children living on this street. 5. Esthetics shoiild not be the sason for alignment of Brown and Virginia. It has no merit in comparison to public safety. 6. In the future planning for Highway 12, there will be a need for additional stop signals. The intersection of Brown aiid Virginia would not be the logical place for them. Virginia A.anue, presently not a through street, and With the incline to the west on Highway 12 could create hazards for a controlled intersection at this location. A controlled intersection further to the west would be a far better location. 7. I* rropo^.^-i int-.'rscfior. Jcas i. ocascJ, 3nd ari/eri cof.Diruia tJiin ; '/ir?lnia ^verjiie tc ^.-3 a through the alter*.ativ* would be to ola«« off 'Virginia Avariue at the north end. Aa a rs&ult, .«e wit!i elatueritary age c.iildrsn witt net ba provided with bus sar'.»ioe directly ur* Virginia, as it ia now. Ue would need to board our children cn either Highv^ay 12 or Daniels Steet. two vsrv busy and dangerous roads. We believe our police protection would decrease. They currently patrol the street on a regular basis, whereas previously being a dead end street, we seldom saw a patrol car. We also question the snow plowing o4 such s long dead end street, with out providing a turn around area ^or the plows. The city may need to take this under consideration. along with the fire protection and the location of the fire hydrant. We propose that Brown Road be left as is. or to consider another alternative. That which may be to construct a service road on the north side, parallel with Highway 12. from Brown going west and •uaking an intersection with Shaughnessy Ave. This intersection would better aerve the west industrial areas, and would bs ths most logical place for a future placement of a stop signal, away from the curve and hill on Highway 12. At one point iri time, this was a proposal considared b/ the City of Qrcno- Thank you for your considerations. sincerely. 7. If the propo'=ed in ter sec tian docs proceed^ and drivers cuntinue tliinkiitg Virginia Avenue to be a through street, .the alternative would be to close off Virginia Avenue at the north end. As a result/ we with eleuientary age children will not be provided with bus service directly on Virginia, as it is now. We would need to board our children on either Highway 12 or- Daviiels Steeb, two very busy and dangerous roads. We believe our police protection would decrease. They currently patrol the street on a regular basis, wlrereas previously being a dead end street, we seldoin saw a patrol car. We also question the snow plowing of such a long dead end street, with out providing a turn around area for the plows. The city may need to take this under consideration, along with the fire protection and the location of the fire hydrant. We propose that Brown Road be left as is, or to consider anotfier alternative. That wfiich may be to construct a service road on the north side, parallel witfi High'»ay 12, from Drown going west and making an intersection with Phaughnessy Ave. 'ihis inter sectiovi would better ser ve the west industr ial areas, and would bn the most logical place for a future placement of a stop sigYial, away from thn cui vo and liill on Highway 12. At one point in time, this was a proposal considered by the City of Oronu. Thank you for your considerations. Sincerely, LIST OP LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR MEETING OF May 22. 1989 Septic System installers -A-1 ©potmaster • 7502 Hudson Blvd Lake Elmo American Sewer & Water Route 3, 193A Buffalo Swedlund Septic Services 9520 Lake Town Road Chaska Garbage & Refuse Collector's -Blackowiak & Son 1195 Sunnyfield Road N Mound East Tonka Sanitation P.O. Box 242 Long Lake Special Event - Wheels & Spokes, Inc bicycle ride S'mday, May 21, 1989 jf sw w -.. . . -- - - Post Office Box 66 OROJiTO Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323 SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS LICENSE APPLICATION Y Y building Jl zoning - 473-7357 assessing All questions must be answered. License fee, bond, certificate of insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification or Home Sewage Treatment Workshop attendence must accompany this application. All applications ^re subject to a ten (10) day approval period. 1. 2. 3. 4. Business or trade ncune Business address 7S0 ^ PC//)So^) Business phone *7 58-^3SS Residence phone 73 ’* Name of applicant or company representative holding certification _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ '*:L 5.Type of certification held: _ _ Site evaluator System designer Installer Pumper Is this a Provisional Csrtificate?Certificate No. 6.If no Certificate is held, provide evidence of attendance at one of the On-Site Sewage Treatment Workshops held immediately prior to the current construction season. 7-Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? A^Q Most recent year _ _ _ _ 8.Have you ever had a license revoked? Where? When? Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes_ 10. Do you pump out septic tcuiks? Yes V No y ICE _ J V V -3- »_ • V V SUBMITTALS REQUIRED: 1. 2. / 3. 4. $25.00 license application fee. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted $10-50-100,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. 9-20*^ Copy of current MPCA Certificate or evidence of attendence au On-Site Sewage Treatment Workshop held immediately prior to currer.t construction season. LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED. List persons other them applicanc who are authorized by you naits under your license NAT^j\k( The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of Orono, Minnesota, for .license to install and repair septii? systems, and/or pump out septic tanks,, subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota amd the Ordinances of the City of-II- -uxono. / ] Date y ^ 9 Applic^ts Signatured J - Staff racommendation(^pprovai,//^l'^^ Denial Reason for denial: ^ City Council Action* license mailed Date ^ Date Date Approved Denied License maiiea _ _ _ _ _ ^ Pumpouts oajI-y CITYrfORONO Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323 SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS LICENSE APPLICATION . BUILOING 4 ZONING - 473*7357 assessing All questions must be answered. License fee, bond, certificate of insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification or Home Sewage Treatment Workshop attendence must accompany this application. All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. 1. 2. 3. 4. Business or trade name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Business address ^ •- - Business phone V77-/^// f Residence phone J>^.1_ name of applicant or company representative holding MPCA certification tf Cf_ _ __ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ 6. 7. 5. Typo of certification held: Installer - Pumper >C Site evaluator >Csystem designer Is this a Provisional Certificate? _ _ Certificate No. If no Certificate is held, provide evidence of attendance at one of the On-Site Sewage Treatment Workshops held immediatelj^ prior to the current construction season. /V'rnt.to. w/THave you ever held a Septic System •‘^^stal^r^icense in-- ‘ Orono before? Most recent year //f5rrnmj 8.Have you ever had a license revoked? PO When? Where? Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes X. 10. Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes_ _ .-•cwA ~E‘zIPT^Tar>yi No^ fZ-l r- u CE -:r . • f « -r • «w* t t fCU SUBMITTALS REQUIRED: ^0^1, $25.00 license application fee. f ^ 2. $2000.00 license and permit bond n2uning City of Orono as . obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted ^ 3. $10-50-100,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. 4. Copy of current MPCA Certificate or evidence of attendence at On-Site Sewage Treatment Workshop held immediately prior to current construction season. LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED. List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of Orono, Minnesota, for.license to install and repair septic systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, sul'ject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinancethe City of Orono. ^ Date <2- 7"Applicants Signature yj CITY CSE ONLY Staff recamraendation^^-^pprovaJl^y^^^ Reason for denial: ^ _ _ _ City CouTicil Action Date _ _ _ _ _ _ Date license mailed _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date Approved Denied CITY OP ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Eay^ MNp5|23 473-7257 GARBAGE & .Idizense Year |e Received I *Miri5|989 dsb collbctor /9r?9-9D /C>Sr^ Paid yoS>Gn initials CENSE APPLICATION The undersigned wishes to operate indicated busi^ness in the City of Orono and herewith makes application for a license to do so. Business/Firm ElackoMia h. S Son ---------------- Address_______7 795 Su/imtAloJid N. Mound.U/m/1 55364 (Street) Business Phone Number 472-339« (City)(State) (Zip Code) Applicant's Name ___________ Address |st fAonk BZackouUak, Ja., (CityO Minn,__________ (State) (Zip Code) Phone Number Check One: 472-2977 Individual Partnership 5 ____ Corporation Number of Vehicles to be used in Orono . Description of Vehicles (attached list if more)s Loaded Loaded me -r;- Size/Yards License,.Nuinb^ ilz.V\ wii- i'C Year 7975 T07? Hfor. Mack uross wi.. 56.000 cajk ra^e**w V* — - 34,000 ;C^cfe vn 75«5i:i:''' n M It II vx 47822 ...........' J ’■ 17/0 ' 7976 * n If M 25 ud6.VX 77268 General area o' City served nj,mn_ _prrenf nn^th n( Frr V. Schedule of Collection charges/ dates 19^1- Mofi'- OOO^M 000 - __ _ _ _nr-ono OOOO ^ o^ Jfiwg. 7. ~ 20.00 (I month —_ _ __ _ _ ,, ,, Appr^imate number of customers in Orono _’’m Locatior of dumping araa rhnf,ka. uni - - - - ra'oTOm’roR foluwikg : surety bond in the amount of 51,000. °^i„''"%Yaus” '”Annu"al“tris°i LTtaLrreTaire?b;\a^f" ^hrabo^Vinf^r^Al^s'^o^^^^^^^ Applicant _ _ _ _ ^ .^. J a r^J>^ -signatufh of City 'Otticiai Da^e CITYof ORONO Post Office Box » Crystal Bay. MinnsaoU 55323 - • building * ZONING - 473-7357 assessing SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS license APPLICATION -- - - - - --- - - - - - - --- -license tee, bond, certificate Ift'^Uoatlonflrfs^Sjecl: to a ten (10) day approval perrod.i are suojts^-i- - — or «.». „..?M I I'm / Boilno.. aadr..i 9^'’ <1-tt fai"H ^ ,„.la,.. Phon. TTthis a Provisional Certificat ------ PTQT ‘i! ' ;“ior^fthr;L-renr:oLtruction season. Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono'^befLe? ^ Most recent year - - - - Have you ever had a license revoked? When? - - - - Do*you do M^icipal sewer hook-ups? ^s^ Uf No _________ :.r :^S5. fl4- A 1. $25.00 license namino City of drbnb:.asiV^ 2 $2000.00 license and permit L accepted. Ti. riC7,. / ^ mi,^ Q^ate Plumbers Bond will not oe ^ _■iti*'' 0^^ f obligee. The state r of Insurance. r'-.-, €«a V 3. $10-30-100,000 minimum evidence or attiendence^ 3. $^^^ MPCA certificate_or_evidenc^ -r ■'C. t:. wlrksSop held immediately prior to current construction season. licenses will not be processed until all items are submitted. t. A.u,« -nnileant who are authorized by you to5JSy"Srp”rSf«SS ;iSr The ondereigood end eepeir eepeic OronOf Minnesota, for li . . ♦•anks subiect to the lawss &°.;i.“.sre.s-s?si^r. =««. ciev Orono. Date City Council Action Date license mailed OF < P.O.’ Box’ Crystal ] 473-7357 cense Year ate Received* garbage pBPnsB co: ee Paid 6^0. crO ’! - - - - Urs LICENSE APPLICATION i9^Q-9o k- //~ v-9 Initials72jL) The undersigned wishes to operate the indicated business in the City of Orono and herewith makes application for a license to do so. Business^ Address: r. (Street) ^ Business Phone Number (State) (Zip Code) (Strse^)^^ (City) /(State) TTT^Tc^ Phone HOmber —^O/S (City)(Zip Code).- Check One:Individual Number of Vehicles to be used in Orono Partnership ^_ _ _ _ _ __ Corp6ra3:ion .-cy Description of Vehicles (attached list if more)* Loaded Loaded .• r V •/- Y-ar /177 Hfgr.Gross Wt.Rear Axle Wt.Size/Yards ///.V /iir m 1 ^4.6 ad L'.^I 1/ '4^loC^ General area of City served / Schedule of Collection charges/ dates Approximate nmnber of customers in Orono Location of dumping area [ At MUST ENCLOSE THE FOLLOffING:IN ORDER FOR THIS APPLICATION TO BE COMPLETE, Tam throwner and operator of the above business and I have paid all license fees and taxes required by law. The above information is correct. - - - - - - - - -- A^li/^ant Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ FOR^fclTY USE ONLY: After review of applicationr staff recommends: A ^ Approval _ _ _ _ _ Denial _ _ _ _ _ Other (specify) Sign5€ure lof City Official Date APPLICATION PARADES and SPECIAL EVENTS CITY of ORONO, MINNESOTA 55323 Application Number. Name ^Piki(.Jnc Address 1^1^ i>i 6oy ?4 Mi. (9Jv) Locatlon of Parade or Event k IC h M*1 |c b Ci.ii /I4 ft (W }i md- i^rinch fid lil^ h AcQ-h \ik) it ^ ^ b lb h) 'VnA/'.* Route changed due to constructi on County Rc^d 19 Name of Persons and/or Organizations Handling the Event Sdr^CM Phnne Hungers ^ ' ^-1^3 Date of Event ^1 19 Hours of Event 1-/4N' 4^M Reason or Purpose It pjTO»|e OttijcUA^ Hr wlitt, .•r ^, 'uiTu CFf ’rC • Wi* Insurance Coverage ^ tP Ck'X^‘^^6j Amount ^miOOO- OO Company • w w V [j©lDWi m 51989 Vi ;sv C u* • V \ "to 0:Cl 706 • v5/v5.CofiiM liihrnirfh'/ u ‘7..^ tnk>rwihf I ^ --------------- )r Thet/ uiill Copy of Insurance Certificates to be Submitted wlLLli Lliis.AppliLaLiun. I am avare of all applicable State and other laws regarding Parades and duC-^Hjj ^ Special Events and will abide by same. I also agree to hold the City of Orono harmless from all liabilities that may arise directly or indirectly from the Parade or Special Event approved by the granting of this permit. f^^nA/u c X JC/ytl/a C Fee: $25.00 Hrfn^at i 4 ‘‘Jhm'i 4 ^fola c Signature of Applicant Fee Paid Date:M 'tj .. 19 Cash _ _ _ _ Initials _ _ _ RECOMMENDED: YesJ^ No. Public Safety Dire^'tor Approved: Yes_ _ _ No Clerk-Administrator Office Use Only: Remarks : ^ Iz, kl’L^ 3-R4 NAME ANDERSON. BRUCE L BERNHARDSON. MARK E BERNHARDSON. MARK E BOBZIEN, SUE A BOSMA, JAMIE L BOYLAN, STEVEN D BRAUN. ROBERT R BRINKHAUS, JC F CHESWICK. GARY B CHRISTIANSON. SALLY CORNICK. JAMES L ENGLISHIII. IRVING H ERICKSON. KURT R FISCHENICH. DAN T FRITZLEP. JOHN M QAFFRON. MICHAEL P QERHARDSON. JOHN R GhtGORV, JAMES D HALLIN. DOROTHY M HANSEN, STEVEN C HANSING. CAROL J JACOBS. THOMAS J JOHNSON. BRADLEY P KILBO. MELVIN H KNUTSON, CHARLOTTE A KUEHN. THOMAS M KUYPER, SCOTT E LINDSTROM. DAVID J MABUSTH. JEANNE A MILLS Jli. WALTER H MORAN. MARK F MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES NAAB. THERESA L OAS. DANIEL 0 OBRIEN, RANDY L OMAN. LYLE E OUAST. WAYNE A RATHBUN. BARRY J SASS. JOHN J SCHAUSS. CHARLES R SCHEFFLER. LAURIE K SKREEN. DALE S STEFFENHAGEN. RONALD STEVENS. BETTY G THOMTON. MARK R TOMCHECK, LAWRENCE F TOMCZVK. MARK W 31 12 12 31 12 93 93 42 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 33 42 42 12 42 31 33 31 31 15 15 31 93 33 93 31 31 12 93 92 33 92 92 42 31 12 42 93 93 31 31 31 YTD GROSS 15385.53 19646.72 21690.80 8882.46 5025.88 68.88 110.25 14163.14 14053.20 1687.47 15037.23 14498.41 14168.85 13806.76 14535.69 12539.71 16904.80 12345.31 11069.22 9151.27 4919.55 12539.64 14291.14 18185.20 8849.67 17013.62 2799.43 22.50 15024.14 441.75 14940.68 16325.43 8846.44 357.50 9878.51 10515.72 11512.15 10359.65 11194.04 11484 7521 10859 11084 593 12723 13342.48 13757.10 41 22 24 44 26 70 CURRENT GROSS 1415.32 250.00 2044.08 886.40 452.92 68.88 110.25 1308.00 1468.00 132.66 1530.62 1589.07 1543.21 1412.88 1364.16 1256.09 1693.37 1410.24 1108.80 1021.44 501.03 1256.08 1385.48 1821.60 886.40 1704.24 691.73 22.50 1504.95 218.50 1337.28 1440.89 927.95 112.50 952.20 1053.3C 1204.82 1107.29 1247.43 1299.19 760.51 1265.68 1110.32 307.13 1311.38 1481.90 1364.17 o G05/14/89 PR: 15 CB PRREGOR NAME WALSH. KEVIN L WA.TERS. LINDA YTD CURRENT DPT GROSS GROSS 35 2605.91 366.90 15 2413.36 804.48 51.514.28 5. SBSt .a , . oIBBS'TlJy OF ORONO u n oCteK REGISTER O o2-89 PAGE CHECK NO.DATE ' AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. IN\ 128474 05/17/89 10,773.88 METRO WASTE CONTROL PREPD MWCC JUNE 73-1282-000-00 10,773.86 • 142005 05/17/89 156.55 ALL STAR PRO GOLF CO GLOVES 4 GRIPS 74-4801-591-94 156.55 * 142006 05/17/89 25.04 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-039-12 142006 05/17/89 25.04 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-059-14 142006 05/17/89 25.03 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-069-15 142006 05/17/89 25.04 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-129-31 142006 05/17/89 25.04 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-174-33 142006 05/17/89 25.04 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-249-42 150.23 - 142014 05/17/89 33.84 ALL STAR ELECTRIC REPLACE BULB 01-4233-249-42 33 84 • 142031 05/17/89 1.15 AT & I COMM TELEPHONE 01-4320-039-12 1.15 * 142034 05/17/89 451.10 ANCHOR PA-'FR COPY PAPER 01-1261-000-00 451.10 • 142039 05/17/89 177.31 EARL F ANDEPSON ASSC SIGNS 01-4233-249-42 177.31 • 142097 05/17/89 11.48 CAPITOL CITY DIST WATER CAPS 01-4232-249-42 11.48 - 142114 05/17/89 327.97 CITYVIEW PLMEG & HTG REPLACE PIPES 74-4343-590-93 327.97 • 142124 05/17/89 350.85 COCA COLA VENDING POP 74-4802-591-94 350.85 • 142128 05/17/89 15.00 CONCEPT MICROFILM DELIVER FILE 01-4321-174-33 15.00 " -C -Cl -Cl -Cl -Cl- '-C« '-CK • wo 1989^TY OF ORONO O CHtCR REGISTER > CHECK NO.DATE 'AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV ♦ / 142130 142130 05/17/89 05/17/89 48.71 94.96 143.67 4 COLONIAL LIFE INS CO COLONIAL LIFE INS CO MAY DIS INS MAY DIS INS 01-4152-126-31 01-4152-129-31 142133 142133 'J5/17/89 05/17/89 5.00 359.00364.00 M COMM-REV SALES TAX COMM-REV SALES TAX SALES TAX APRIL SALES TAX APRIL 01-3500-000-00 74-2222-000-00 142147 05/17/89 10.85 10.85 CROWN MARKING INC NAME PLATE 01-4210-039-12 »142154 142154 05/17/89 05/17/89 747.00 195.70 942.70 a CYS UNIFORMS CYS UNIFORMS SHOULDER PATCH UNIFORMS C!-4221-129-31 01-4221-129-31 0 p 142157 142157 05/17/89 05/17/89 255.00 638.72 943.72 a DAHLGREN SHARDLOW DAHLGREN SHARDLOW REBERS CUP HWY 12 COMP PLAN 01-4306-174-33 01-4306-299-72 t 142188 05/17/89 55.36 55.36 a E A SWEEN SANDWICHES 74-4802-591-94 142190 142190 05/17/89 05/17/89 45.00 49.90 94.90 a EARL W DAY & SONS EARL W DAY & SONS REPAIR FURNANCE REPAIR SINK 01-4231-129-31 01-4231-129-31 142199 142199 05/17/89 05/17/89 100.63 4,231.00 4,331.63 a ROLF E ERICKSON ROLF E ERICKSON OFFICE SUPPLIES ASSESSING FEE MAY 01-4210-059-14 01-4307-059-14 142202 05/17/89 18.18 18.18 a EMRICH BAKING CO ROLLS 74-4802-591-94 f 142203 142203 05/17/89 05/17/89 2.19 12.72 14.91 a ERICKSON/KURT ERICKSON/KURT OFFICE SUPPLIES MILEAGE 01-4210-129-31 01-4381-129-31 • o o 1^^o ’2-t9 PAGE ***-ck ; • ••-CK: «*«-CK **«-CK -CK -CK -CK: o |i:j O 198?^rtY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE 142256 142258 142269 142272 142272142272 142272 142272 142272 142272 142275 142275 142275 142275 142275 142275 142275 142284 142330 142350 142355 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 AMOUNT 373.64 373.64 116.50 116.50 ‘ 340.00 340.00 3.03 176.41 22.90 77.46 35.86 24.82 9.09 349.57 902.23 902.23- 236.77 93.35 902.23 93.35 191.00 1,516.70 ' 35.40 35.40 - 86.87 86.87 • 65.00 65.00 • 51.95 CHo-K REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION GENUINE PARTS CO GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD GOVT TRAINING SERV HAPPYS POTATO CHIP ICMA RETRMNT CORP INTL INST-MUNI CLKS I.NTERSTATE BATTERIES MISC SUPPLIES BOTTLE WATER B JOHNSON CHIPS ICMA 5/1-5/14 HALLIN DUES o r2-89 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. « P.O. # MESSAGE BATTERY 01-4232-249-'l2 01-4231-09^-17 01-4356-129-31 &K SERVICES UNIFORMS 01-4221-249-42 &K SERVICES UNIFORMS 01-4221-249-42 &K SERVICES MAT 01-4231-099-17 &K SERVICES MAINT BLDG 01-4343-129-31 &K SERVICES UNIFORMS 72-4221-549-91 &K SERVICES UNIFORMS 73-4221-569-92 &K SERVICES UNIFORMS 74-4221-590-93 GROUP HEALTH INC HEALTH INS JUNE 01-4121-129-31 GROUP HEALTH INC HEALTH INS JUNE 01-4121-129-31 GROUP HEALTH INC HEALTH INS JUNE 01-4151-121-31 GROUP HEALTH INC HEALTH INS JUNE 01-4151-126-31 GROUP HEALTH INC HEALTH INS JUNE 01-4151-129-31 GROUP HEALTH INC HEALTH INS JUNE 01-4151-174-33 GROUP HEALTH INC HEALTH INS JUNE 74-4151-590-93 74-4802-591-94 01-4140-039-12 01-4380-039-12 01-4232-249-42 -C •**-C •-*-c a >-c -c -c o IQSffTTiTY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE 142163 142366 1423/2 142388 142391 142400 142407 142407 142435 142435 142435 142435 142435 142435 142435 142435 142435 142435 142435 142435 142435 142435 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/59 05/17/89 05/17/89 AMOUNT 51.95 • 51.60 51.60 * 6.55 6.55 • 35.78 35.78 24.97 24.97 9.98 9.98 181.71 181.71 65.00 180.00 245.00 470. 342. 717, 400 218 4 389 601 319 15 144 21 292 42 3,981 30 83 55 00 39 20 78 64 44 72 13 58 63 93 12 O ClretK REGISTER VENDOR JACOBS/TOM JET QUICK JOHNS AUTO SUPPLY KILBO-MELVIN KNUTSON/CHARLOTTE KUSTOM ELECTRONICS LANO EQUIP CO LANO EQUIP CO LOG IS -SUITE 300 LOG IS -SUITE 300 LOG IS -SUITE 300 LOGIS -SUITE 300 LOG IS -SUITE 300 LOGIS -SUITE 300 LOGIS -SUITE 300 LOGIS -SUITE 300 LOGIS -SUITE 300 LOGIS -SUITE 300 LOGIS -SUITE 300 LOGIS -SUITE 300 LOGIS -SUITE 300 LOGIS -SUITE 300 ITEM DESCRIPTION MILEAGE SPECIAL COPIES BULBS POLICE MTG MILEAGE RADAR REPAIR HITCH FOR BOBCAT RENTAL SWEEPER HP HP MNT CONTRACT MNT CONTRACT APPL SUPPORT MAR APPL SUPPORT MAR APPL SUPPORT MAR COURIER D P DATA PROC MAR DATA PROC MAR DATA PROC MAR METER BOOK PAGES APPL SUPPORT MAR DATA PROC MAR APPL SUPPORT MAR DATA PROC MAR ACCOUNT NO. INV 01-4381-174-33 01-4210-129-31 01-4341-129-31 01-4356-129-31 01-4381-069-15 01-4342-129-31 01-4232-249-42 01-4331-249-42 01-4340- 01-4340- 01-4352- 01-4352- 01-4352- 01-4353- 01-4355- 01-4355- 01-4355- 72-4210- 72-4352- 72- 4355- 73- 4352- 73-4355- 039-12 174-33 069-15 129-31 174-33 069-15 069-15 129-31 174-33 549-91 549-91 549-91 569-92 569-92 O 2-89 PAGE « P.O. t MESSAGE o 1989 CITY dF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT CHECK >»tfISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 142439 05/17/89 46.88 46.88 H LONG LK FORD TRACTOR MISC PARTS 74-4232-590-93 142441 142441 05/17/89 05/17/89 74.50 44.00 118.50 « LONG LAKE TIRE LONG LAKE TIRE TIRE REPAIR GRADER TIRE REPAIR 01-4342-249-42 01-4342-249-42 142442 05/17/89 47.70 47.70 LOUISVILLE LANDFILL DUMP CHRG 01-4348-249-42 142456 05/17/89 6.65 6.65 *MABUSTH-JEANNE DRINKS MTG 01-4355-174-33 142462 142462 05/17/89 05/17/89 710.63 8.00 718.63 A MARTINS NAVARRE 66 MARTINS NAVARRE 66 APRIL AUTO REPAIR TIRE REPAIR 01-4341-129-31 74-4342-590-93 142469 05/17/89 820.00 820.00 n METRO W INSP SERV 41 BLDG INSPEC 01-4306-174-33 142485 142485 05/17/89 05/17/89 31.17 29.40 60.57 A MPLS OXYGEN CO MPLS OXYGEN CO OXYGEN DEMURRAGE 01-4232-129-31 01-4234-249-42 142490 05/17/89 196.73 196.73 A MINNEGASCO HEAT 01-4324-099-17 142506 05/17/89 50.00 50.00 A MINN GOLF ASSN DONATION 74-J825-590-93 142548 142548 142548 142548 142548 142548 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 1.78 99.17 91.42 127.45 16.04 39.55 NAVARRE HARDWARE NAVARRE HARDWARE NAVARRE HARDWARE NAVARRE HARDWARE NAVARRE HARDWARE NAVARRE HARDWARE MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES 01-4210-174-33 01-4231-099-17 01-4232-129-31 01-4232-249-42 72- 4232-549-91 73- 4232-569-92 05-2iHP PAGE 5 ACCOUNT NO. INV. * P.O. • MESSAGE -••-CKS --‘-CKS --•-CKS -••-CKS •••-CKS -CKS -CKS ■••-CKS •••-CKS o o 198P^TY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE O o REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION O ^22-89 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. « MESSAQI 142548 05/17/89 36.12 411.53 • NAVARRE HARDWARE MISC SUPPLIES 74-4242-590-93 142559 05/17/89 079.53 979.53 * NSP STREET LGHTS MAY 01-43. ;49-42 142562 142562 142562 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 2.75 1,266.78 135.02 1,404.55 • NSP NSP NSP UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES 01-4324-175-34 72- 4324-549-91 73- 4324-569-92 142574 142574 05/17/89 05/17/89 99.00 369.00 468.00 * OFFICE PROD OF MN OFFICE PROD OF MN LOTUS CLASS SOUND CLOSER 01-4356-069-15 14-4540-626-00 142597 05/17/89 3,775.35 3,775.35 • PUBLIC EMPu RET ASSN PERA 5/1-5/14 01-2031-000-00 142613 142613 142613 142613 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 184.84 5.60 10.95 4.20 205.59 * PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR REPAIR TRUCK CAR WASH CAR WASH CAR WASH 01-4341-249-42 01-4342-249-42 72- 4342-549-91 73- 4342-569-92 142627 05/17/89 43.50 43.50 ■» PITNEY BOWES POSTAGE 01-4321-129-31 142639 05/17/89 6.12 6.12 » PROEX PHOTO SUP FILM PROCES 01-4210-174-33 142662 05/17/89 103.70 103.70 - REED CANDY & TOBACCO CANDY/CIGS 74-4802-591-94 142665 05/17/89 43.30 43.30 »RICKS SUPERVALU MISC SUPPLIES 74-4242-590-93 O O U 19 OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE o REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ri o F2-89 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. t P.O. # MESSAGE wn 142719 05/17/89 80.00 80.00 • DIXIE PETRO-CHEM 2 CYL CHLORINE 72-4234-549-91 142776 05/17/89 70.00 70.00 • THORPE DIST CO BEER 74-4815-591-94 142793 05/17/89 489.00 489.00 * TC TRIMLINE INC LETTER 3 SQD CARS 01-4341-129-31 142796 142796 142796 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 28.50 29.95 28.50 86.95 • UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED VEST COVER RAIN JACKET VEST COVER 01-4221-121-31 01-4221-129-31 01-4221-129-31 142815 142815 142815 142815 142815 142815 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 40.92 19.50 20.72 51.91 16.57 24.86 174.48 * US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST CCMMUN US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE TELEPHONE DATA PROC TELEPHONE DATA PROC DATA PROC 01-4320-129-31 01-4320-249-42 0l-4355-Gb.1-15 72-4320-549-91 72- 4355-54:-91 73- 4355-569-92 142831 05/17/89 27.34 27.34 • WALTERS LINDA MILEAGE 01-4381-069-15 142835 05/17/89 486.00 486.00 ■ WARNING LITES OF MN FLASHERS 01-4331-249-42 142842 05/17/89 1,314.15 1,314.15 • WAYZATA-CITY OF 89 1ST QTR WATER 72-2224-000-00 142875 05/17/89 8.25 8.25 » WRIGHT HENN ELECTRIC UTILITIES 01-4324-249-42 142901 05/17/89 65.00^ r A A * INTL AC CHIEF POLICE DUES 01-4380-129-31 K «« .| « * a .1 o 1989 CITY CHECK NO OF ORONO DATE 142902 142903 142904 142903 142906 142907 142908 142909 142910 142911 142912 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 05/17/89 AMOUNT 245.00 245.00 • 5.00 5.00 • 6.50 6.50 • 110.00 110.00 " 255.88 255.88 - 98.90 98.90 • 368.00 368.00 * 24.67 24.67 * 110.00 110.00 " 254.15 254.15 • 500.00 500.00 * 23.743.59 369.00 3,451.69 11.702.02 1.861.40 41.127.70 O r- CHECK REGISTER VENDOR DICKS AUTO DETAIL MEMA POSTMATER MOORE SIGN ROAD RESCUE INC SHORLINE STERLING FENCE INC WELCH NATHALIE ZIEBART Lc rIAUG %H HAUG M C W 0 FUND 01 TOTAL FUND 14 TOTAL FUND 72 TOTAL FUND 73 TOTAL FUND 74 TOTAL TOTAL ITEM DESCRIPTION CLEAN SQUAD CARS ENQY ASSOC MTQ PO BOX RENTAL TRUCK LETTERING ARROW STICK FETCH POLE REPAIR FENCE POSTER RUST PROOF PICKUP RFD ASMMT 1988 LLCWP GRANT APPL 05-22-89 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O « MESSAGE 01-4550-129-31 01-4356-129-31 01-4321-129-31 72-4341-549-91 01-4232-129-31 01-4232-185-35 72- 4343-549-Sl 01-4398-129-31 73- 4341-569-92 73-4850-569-92 L -4306-299-72 GENERAL FUND IMPROVE & EQUIP OUTLAY F WATER OPERATING FUND SEWER OPERATING FUND GOLF COURSE OPERATING FD O o . J.' .. .;/• r . f * . <1 .» ;r HCe^37 OS/10/89 r M 0 •••-CKS |4« M M HC0436 05/10/89 307.07 FIRST NAT BK LAKES FICA 3/80T04/8 01-4148-039>18 MANUAL |47 J7 i HC8436 05/10/89 6.63 FIRST NAT BK LAKES FICA 3/80T04/8 01-4148-040-13 MANUAL 41 90 M 1 HC8436 05/10/89 3.08 FIRST NAT BK LAKES FICA 3/80T04/8 01-4148-059-14 MANUAL fc* 3»' HC8436 OS/1 0/89 159.70 FIRST NAT _BK LAKES FICA 3/80T04/8 01-4148-069-15 MANUAL 3? 40>HC8436 05/10/89 15.86 FIRST NAT BK LAKES FICA 3/80T04/8 01-4148-099-17 MANUAL - 41 HC8436 05/10/89 34.96 FIRST NAT **K LAKES FICA 3/80T04/8 01-4148-111-31 MANUAL •a 41 HC8436 05/10/89 104.09 FIRST NAT wK LAKES FICA 3/80T04/8 01-4148-115-31 MANUAL 4J HC8436 05/10/89 88.40 FIRST NAT BK LAKES FICA 3/80T04/8 01-4148-181-31 MANUAL 97 'so 44 HC8436 05/10/89 80.71 FIRST NAT BK LAKES FICA 3/80T04/8 01-4148-186-31 MANUAL tm 4t _ _HC8438 05/10/89 466.66 FIRST NAT BK LAKES FICA 3/80T04/8 01-4148-174-33 MANUAL •c 1 HC8436 05/10/89 3.03 FIRST NAT BK LAKES FICA 3/80T04/a 01-4148-185-35 MANUAL • 1 91 n NC8436 05/10/89 349.15 FIRST NAT BK LAKES FICA 3/80T04/8 01-4148-849-48 MANUAL 1 HC8436 05/10/89 88.48 FIRST NAT BK LAKES FICA 3/80T04/8 01-4148-890-61 MANUAL 4«NC8436 05/10/89 170.94 FIRST NAT BK LAKES FICA 3/80T04/8 78-4148-549-91 MANUAL 99 99 Hi:8436 05/10/89 170.09 FIRST NAT BK LAKES FICA 3/80T04/8 73-4148-569-98 MANUAL 97 05/10/89 95.63 FIRST NAT BK LAKES FICA 3/80TO4/8 74-4148-590-93 MANUAL 99< 5 1,958.36 «991 h"J HC8437 05/10/89 100.86 POSTMASTER SEUER AND WATER eeu'eo Aun liatcd BL6 tti e 78-4381-549-91 MANUAL MANUAL T 1-,. !t.v 250.65 * 1989 OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE_ HC8440 AO 1 Ayfi4 95/10/89 CHECK Ni-filSTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ , -V 04~30-89^>A8E ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. t MESSAGE SEARS TOOLS 01-4848-649-42 84.38 « 10.50 10 so « CITY OF UAYZATA LICENSE 8 80UAD8 01-4383-189-31 MANUAL •««-CKS MANUAL HC8441 05/10/89 £50.00 850.00 • ORONO GOLF CR3E GOLF CSE PTY CSH 74-1048-000-00 MANUAL ii: !!l HC8448 05/10/89 30.00 30 . AO SENSIBLE LAND USE MTG 01-4356-174-33 MANUAL *.4*-CK8 >1 HC8444 “i HC8444 MCA444 05/10/89 05/10/89 A^yiAyA9 14.00 332.14 8.37 FIRST NAT BK LAKES FIRST NAT BK LAKES _ FIRST NAT BK LAKES FICA APRIL ICA 4/3T0 4/16 ICA 4/3T0 4/16 01-4142-020-11 01-4142-039-12 01-4142-059-14 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL 29 I* u X9 24 HC8444 HC8444 HCS444 05/10/89 05/10/89 OS/1 0/89 215.67 18.49 31.13 FIRST NAT BK LAKES FIRST NAT BK LAKES FIRST NAT BK LAKES ICA 4/3T0 4/16 ICA 4/3T0 4/16 ICA 4/3T0 4/16 '*1-4142-069-15 01-4142-099-17 01-4142-111-31 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL ,tr lx 191 U !*•! Zfi HC8444 HC8444 UCA444 OS/1 0/89 05/10/89 OS/1Q/A9 106.94 27.19 FIRST NAT BK LAKES FIST NAT BK LAKES ICA 4/3T0 4/16 FICA 4/3T04/16 FICA 4/3T04/16 01-4142-115-31 01-4142-121-31 01-4142-126-31 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL je am SO HC8444 HC8444 HC8444 05/10/89 05/10/89 05/10/89 4B* 34 3.92 41 1 u8 FIST NAT BK LAKES FIST NAT BK LAKES FIST NAT BK LAKES FICA 4/3T04/16 FICA 4/3T04/16 FICA 4/3T04/16 01-4142-174-33 01-4142-185-35 01-4142-249-42 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL at sa 3J HC8444 HC8444 OS/tO/89 05/10/89 OS/I 0/89 42 1 161 33 FIST NAT BK LAKES FIST NAT BK LAKES FIST NAT BK LAKES FICA 4/3T04/16 FICA 4/3T04/16 FICA 4/3T04/16 01-4142-290-61 72- 4142-549-91 73- 4142-569-92 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL Pl2 24 22 M HC8444 05/10/89 98.31 2.064.31 • FIST NAT BK LAKES FICA 4/3T04/16 74-4142-590-93 MANUAL 'c ST SO •••-CK8 *•>so- so UrA44&05/10/A9 19.75 APPLE VALLEY MUNICIPALS 01-4356-039-12 MANUAL Ml40 40 HC8440 HC8446 HC844& 05/10/89 05/10/89 05/10/89 19.75- 19.75 19.75 AFPL" VALLEY APPLE VALLEY APPLE VALLEY MUNICIFALS MUNICIPALS DINNER MTG 01-4356-039-15 01-4356-039-15 01-4356-069-15 MANUAL MANUAL KA-YUAL SJI M o 1 39.50 • Ml ! MCa447 05/10/89 7.00 COMM REV SALES TAX SALES TAX MARCH 51-3500-000-00 MANUAL HC8447 05/10/89 224.00 231.00 • COMM REV SALES TAX SALES TAX MARCH 72-2222-000-00 MANUAL «ai Ml Mi 40j fOj 111 HC8448 05/10/89 8.15 8.15 « BUDGET PRTO UPS POSTAGE 01-4321-129-31 MANUAL Ml q :3 HC8449 05/10/89 800.00 800.00 • POSTMASTER POLICE POSTAGE 01-4321-129-31 MANUAL ••i ,TOl ••i r' HC8450 05/10/89 135.00 135.00 m GOVT TRNO CITY/CTY MCMT RGISTR 01-4356-039-12 MANUAL F* P w4 ^ # 5 •OF ORONO - - - -LJ— CHECK'llfGISTER V § 04-30-89 -^AGE M \CHECK NO DATE AHOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV.8 P.O. 8 MESSAGE 1 3 ura^ei asyia/A9 148 11 CRACUN8 CONF CTR HR CONF 01-4356-039-12 MANUAL 4 148.11 •HC845S OE/10/89 16.00 GOLDEN VALLEY CC POLCE CF MTC 01-4356-189-31 MANUAL • 7 16.00 « c;•UeA463 OC/IA/A«83.94 PETTY CA9M FRAMES 01-4810-080-11 MANUAL to 11 IS HC84S3 HC84S3 HCS453 05/10/89 05/10/89 05/10/89 6.55 6.55 5.83 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES 01-4810-039-18 01-4810-069-15 01-4810-189-31 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL 'i: IS 14 If HC8453 HC8453 05/10/89 05/10/89 05/10/89 6.56 8.20 10.47 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH MISC SUPPLIES POSTAGE POSTAGE 01-4810-174-33 01-4381-039-18 01-4381-189-31 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL 17 18 r '•| HC8453 HC8453 HC84S3 05/10/89 05/10/89 05/10/89 1.00 15.00 8.15 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH POSTAGE 79 BUMPER BUS LASS 01-4381-174-33 01-4341-849-48 01-4356-039-18 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL 8^ ar zs r 19 :e. ar HC8453 HC8453 05/10/89 05/10/89 10.50 8.85 99.00 • PETTY CASH PETTY CASH MEETING EXP AUTO RE6STR 01-4388-189-31 01-4383-189-31 MANUAL MANUAL ar *> ;3 1 «««-CKB u X f1 • 29' •271 HC84S5 05/10/89 38.00 38.00 • LINEN CENTER BLINDS % 01-4343-099-17 MANUAL 3' 3* ;s»( d HC8456 05/10/89 900.00 900.00 « POSTHASTER POSTAGE INVENTORY 01-1868-000-00 MANUAL 37 30 30 4C 3<t aai HC84SY 05/10/89 10.00 10.00 • POSTMASTER SURVEY POSTAGE 01-4381-849-48 MANUAL _ S4 M M HC8458 05/10/89 47.60 47.60 • LUNCHES BOX SUPPERS 01-4388-174-33 MANUAL <48 I44 47 »’! •••••• «! Mt 5,487.78 640.97 FUND 01 TOTAL FUND 78 TOTAL GENERAL FUND WATER OPERATING FUND ••v-CKS 40 41 4t^ 481.81 443.94 FUND 73 TOTAL FUND 74 TOTAL SEWER OPERATING FUND GOLF COURSE OPERA TING FD 03 *04 09 00 «a 441 4Sl1 7,054.50 TOTAL 00 00 00 •an ti ot »' . o o CITY ADMINISTRATOR/MANAGER SALARY SURVEY (5-15,000) CITY Robblnsdale Stillwater Mounds View North St. Paul Champlin Ransey Shakopee Mound Prior Lake Chaska St. Anthony Mendota Heights Chanhassen Orono Rosenount Savage Lake Elao Falcon Heights Farmington POPULATION 14,528 13,256 13,022 12,228 13,261 11,706 11,613 9,849 10,513 10,018 8,305 8,384 8,485 7,284 6,847 7,400 6,090 5,377 5,162 1988 SALARY $69,000 48,900 49,700 58.000 45.000 41,500 53.600 49.000 4,,760 48.100 49,800 48.000 48,960 53.100 45.100 45.000 29.000 37,860 40.600 1989 SALARY $72,500 49,875 53.000 63,621 Vacant 46.000 Vacant 53,379 49,200 51,936 52.000 50,500 51,610 Pending 50,197 48,904 37.000 Pending 43,456 % INCREASE 5.0% 2.8% 6.6% 9.7% 10.8% 8.9% 3.0% 8.0% 4.4% 5.2% 5.4% 11.3% 8.8% 27.6% 7.0% CITY OP OROHO P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILS #1400 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date of Notice: May 19, 1989 COPIES TO: Mr. and Mrs. Charles Larson 4285 6th Avenue North Long Lake, MN 55356 TYPE OF APPLICATION: XXXX Variance _ _ Conditional Use Permit _ _ Subdivision Other DATE OF MEETING: 5/15/89 VOTE: For: Planning Coraiission recoamends the following: _ _ Approval as submitted _ _ Approval subject to conditions noted below Denial for reasons noted below 6; Against: 0 XXXX Tabled for reasons noted below _ _ No action required NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: In light of your reaction of "disappo;’ntment" at the May meeting of the Planning Commission, it is hoped the following comments will provide background and a clearer perspective of the review of your varia ice application. The Orono Planning Commission has been working on a major ordinance amendment for accessory structures since the first scheduled public hearing in July of 1987. All work on that ordinance amenIment and other amendments of the Zonin^ Code ceased in the late summer of 1988 when all planning efforts were refocused on a Planned Dnit Development and Highway Commercial District Ordinance for the Highway 12 Corridor. An interim ordinance (moratorium) had never been considered since that public hearing and the City staff has continued to accept variance applications. In fact a similar varii.nce application was reviewed by the City at a previous Planning Commission Meeting, at which staff advises that you, Mrs. Larson, attended. That earlier application was tabled at the May 8th Council Meeting because it appeared that the Planning Commission was reaching a resolve of the issue of the relationship of allowed size of an accessory structure to the area of a property. The setback standards appeared to never be an issue, as all agreed that an oversized accessory structure must meet the principal structure (residence) setback for the zoning d’strict. During this period of time, it has been a practice of staff to ask each applicant to make a clear statement of hardship and need. The immediate needs of the applicant have carried great weight in that review process. Variance reviews that involve sections of tht. Code currently under consideration for amendment become a major balancing act for the reviewing staff and member of the Planning Commission. Very often, standards currently under consideration become conditions of variance approval. You should also be aware that both staff and the Planning Commission thought we had developed an acceptable draft on at least three other occasions. Our residents/applicants have understood the difficult aspect of this process. The majority of cities would have called for an interim ordinance. At the Planning Commission Meeting of May 15th, it was obvious from the staff memo that your applicate , with certain modifications, would meet the standards of the curr^xit draft ordinance presented for action later that evening. They voted to table your application advising that your proposal may not require variance approval and that your application fee would be refunded. The Ordinance Amendment was approved by the Planning Commission with slight modification. The Accessory Structure Ordinance will be presented to the Council for their consideration and action at their May 22nd meeting. A copy of that draft ordinance has been enclosed for your consideration. Please note that the amendment asks for a minimum side setback of 50* for all properties within the 5 acre zoning district. Your site plan shows a 35.6* side setback. Staff has confirmed the area of your property is approximately 5.6+- acres of dry, contiguous land with no designated wetlands. At the May 8th meeting of the Council, a CounciImember asked that an interim ordinance be enac'^d for a limited period of time until the Council had adequate time to review the draft ordinance. It is staff's position that an interim ordinance serves no purpose at this time. The following options are available to you at this time: 1. Request the withdrawal of Application #1400 and the refund of application fee; OR 2. agree to the tabling of Application #1400 for a limited period of time until Council formally adopts an Accessory Structure Amendment. At that time, your current proposal will be evaluated to determine if a variance is still required. If not, your fee will be refunded. If a variance is required, your application will be placed on the agenda for the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission. The City must ask that your declsiori be submitted in writing at your earliest convenience. If you have questions pertaining to the Ordinance Amendment enclosed for your consideration, please contact Michael Gaffron (473-7357). Jeanne A. Mabusth Building 6 Zoning Admin. JAM/ls Enclosure cc: Mayor Grabek and CounciImembers Chairman Kelley and Planning Commissioners Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Assist. Planning & Zoning Admin. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REGULAR MEETING TONKA BAY VILLAGE HALL April 26, 1989 1. CALL TO. ORDER The regular meeting of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District was called to order by Chair JoEllen Hurr at 7:35 P. M., Wednesday, April 26, 1909. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Marvin Bjorlin, Tonka Bay; Jan Boswinkel, Secretary; Minnetonka Beach; David Cochran, Greenwood; Bert Foster, Deephaven; James Grathwol, Excelsior; JoEllen Hurr, Chair, Orono; John Lewman , Treasurer, Minnetrista; John Malinka, Victoria; Robert Pillsbury, Minnetonka; Robert Rascop, Shorewood; Thomas N. Reese, Vice Chair, Mound. Also present: Charles Lefevre, Counsel; Sgt. Wm. F. Chandler, Sheriff’s Water Patrol; Eugene Strommen, Executive Director; David Arndorfer, Consultant. Absentt Ron Kraemer, Spring Park; Robert Slocum, Woodland. 3. MINUTES It was moved by Boswinkel, seconded by Malinka, to approve the minutes of the March 29, 1989 meeting. Motion carried, Bjorlin and Rascop abstaining, being absent from the meeting. 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS Duane Marcus, Wayzata, stated he has submitted a request for an Environmental Assessment Worksheet to the Environmental Quality Board because the Wayzata Yacht Club's expansion is in excess of 20,000 square feet. He has also submitted a petition, signed by 75 fisherpersons, to the District regarding the dredging at the Wayzata Yacht Club property. Hurr informed him the Environmental Quality Board will respond to the Board and until then the Board has no comment to make at this time. Regarding the dredging, the Board has only comment priviledges,and the understanding is the current permit expires May 1. Copies of Marcus’ requests are being furnished to the Board. 5* REPORTS A. Chair Hurr 1) Swearing in of new member Charles Lefevre administered the Oath of Office to Thomas Martinson, newly appointed by the City of Wayzata as its representative on the Board. Mr. Martinson was seated as a member and welcomed. ' r-'i LMCD Board 4/26/89 2^) The Public Hearing requested date for the Minnetonka Yacht Special Density Permit Has deferred to later in the meeting as part of the Committee minutes'.' Club Dock 3) Hurr reported she has been appointed to the Citizen Advisory Committee to the Minnesota Future Resources Commission. Their charge is to recommend how natural resource funds are to be spent, including any possible lottery proceeds. 4) Hurr reported Charles Lefevre has left the Lefevre and Lefler law firm to join the Holmes and Graven law firm. The Board will be entertaining proposals from attorneys for professional services sometime about May 1 and until that time will continue the services of Mr. Lefevre. 5) Hurr read a proposed statement from the LMCD to be presented at the May 9 Public Hearing about the regional park proposed for Lake Minnetonka, a copy made part of the files. Alan Albrecht, Mayor of Greenwood, stated it is important for the LMCD to comment and support the City of Minnetrista. It was moved by Foster, seconded by Reese, to authorize the statement be presented at the May 9 Public Hearing, after some minor word changes. Motion carried, Lewman abstaining. B.Treasurer/Finance 1) Strommen submitted a financial condition report as oT March 31, 1989 which was accepted and filed. Strommen stated he will consult with the account ant to refine a quarterly report. 2) It was moved by Lewman, seconded by Reese, to approve payment of checks 5364 through 5456 as submitted, totalling 135,842.41. Motion carried unanimously. 3) Strommen requested authorization to engage DuWayne L. Schibilla (t Associates to prepare the annual audit at a cost not to exceed 11,000. He also requested authorization to use that firm to assist in preparing a quarterly report. It was moved by Lewman, seconded by Grathwol, to employ DuWayne L. Schibilla & Associates to prepare the annual audit at a cost not to exceed $1,000 and authorize the Executive Director to obtain a cost for preparation of quarterly financial reports. Motion carried unanimously. C. Standing Committees 1) WATER STRUCTURES Chair Cochran a) It was moved by Grathwol, seconded by Foster to amerid the minutes of 4/8/89 to indicate the Committee agreed to hold a Public Hearing on May 13, 1989 to consider the request of the Minnetonka Yacht Club and Lake Minnetonka Sailing School. Motion carried, Hurr voting nay and Martinson abstaining. LMCO Board 4/26/B9 b) Special Density Perait and nen dock 1icense aoplication, Minnetonka Boat Works. Orono. recommending approval to increase BSU from 41 to 47 on Brown's Bay, and from 25 to 67 on Tanager Lake. (Note: Minutes of 4/8/B9 in error in stating 61 units rather than 67). It was moved by Cochran, seconded by Reese, to instruct the Attorney to prepare a Special Density Resolution. DISCUSSION: Stroomen repor::2d the applicant withdrew the fishing pier and parking for the fishing pier amenities following the April 8 Public Hearing. Hurr reported the City of Orono Planning Commission has forwarded the request to their Council with oo recommendation, indicating concern about traffic. The following amenities were presented at the April 8, 1989 Public Hearing: 1. Public Fishing Pier (Withdrawn) 2. (Withdrawn) Limited number of Parking Spaces for the Fishing Pier. 3. One (1) Auto Look-Out 4. Provide waste containers and its disposal 5. Provide Public Restroom Facilities 6. Provide one (1) slip for public agencies or the Hater Patrol to use for emergency purposes. 7. Satisfy the drainage requirements of the governing authorities 8. Provide green Screening and vegetation cover per City of Orono's Ordinance. Lomen said the amenities presented at the April 14 Public Hearing for the Wayzata location are intended to serve both locations as follows: 1. Restaurant 2. Restaurant deck overlooking the bay, open to the public. 3. Additional benches along the boardwalks 4. One (1) slip for Hater Patrol purposes at Orono 5. Access and use of Minnetonka Boat Horks shop boat for the Hayzata Fire Department’s emergency use 6. Meeting room at Sasha's Restaurant available for public use, upon reservation - continued I >■. ' V V * ^ ■ LMCD Board 4/26/09 7. Boat for charter purposes available during the season to deserving non-profit groups on a gratuitous basis monthly, and individual paid reservation, possibly Neekly. 8. Parking spaces available on a first cose, first served basis for public events held on adjacen' :ity property. DISCUSSlONt The following concerns were raised: 1. The withdrawal of the fishing pier and parking at Orono is significant, although there was consideration that the charter boat eight offset the loss of that amenity. 2. Lefevre stated the code does not require the amenities be given a\ the site, but if one property were sold the amenities must continue at the other. Lefevre stated the Board has discretion as some amenities have more value than others. 3. Expanded facilities increase traffic on the Lake, although it was noted very few commerical marinas have the capability to expand, since most are at their allowance limit. ACTION It was moved by Cochran, seconded by Foster, to refer the application back to the Water Structures Committee to tie the Wayzata and Orono amenities together. Motion carried unanimously. Lefevre recommended the amenities be specific to the site, althougn not necessarily located at the site, but kept separate and distinct in event the properties are sold. c1 Special Densitv Permit and new dock license. St. Alban's Bay_ Marina Yacht Club, recommending approval per plan of 3/16/09 for 04 slips subject to four conditions per minutes of 4/8/09 It was moved by Cochran, seconded by Grathwol, to approve the St. Alban's Bay Marina and Yacht Club variance application for overlapping DUA's and to consider additional material from James Gilbert, attorney for the applicant, and Frank Kelly, representing the City of Greenwood. Gilbert reviewed the history of the marina, need for agreements reached with the City of Excelsior, as detailed April 24, 1989. Construction would not begin until the Gilbert added. modernization and in his letter of winter of '89-*90, Margaret Bauer, 005 Hidden Lane, objected to the proposal because additional traffic, lack of parking, increased noise and pollution, decrease quality family rights on the lake. Elizabeth Hansen, Greenwood Counci 1 member, reiterated their opposition. - continued of of LHCD Board 4/26/89 Mel Colby, Windeaere Apartioents, objected to noise, concerned nith larger boats and questioned Excelsior's approval. Grathwol responded by stating the City of Excelsior has no objection to the variances. Colby also nentioned the reduced fishing area. Rick Polk, dock user, favors the proposal because the docks need improvement and parking is no problem. The lot is rarely full. ACTION: The motion to approve the variance for overlapping dock use areas was approved with Boswinkel, Bjorlin and Pillsbury voting nay. The Board then proceeded to consider the Special Density Permi t_ of. St. Alban's Bay Marina |«. Yacht Club. It was moved by Cochran, seconded by Reese, to approve a special density permit and new dock license for St. Alban's Bay Marina and Yacht Club as shown on the plan submitted, dated March 16, 1989, for 84 slips, based on the following considerations: 1. The variance previously recommended for Board approval be considered before consideration of the special density permit and new dock license, as has been done. 2. A covenent on the residential lot be established so its dock rights are tied into th~ special density permit. 3. The City of Excelsior is to issue a Certificate of Occupancy for the residential lot. 4. All amenities includeo in the 4/5/89 letter from Heshbesser, Singer & S. ;ice. Ltd., on behalf of the St. Alban's Bay Marina are to be met. DISCUSSION At the request of Lynn Allar, Greenwood, nine residents of the Excelsior area stood to express their opposition. James Gilbert and Gerald Tobermann presented the amenities noting the DUA is less under this proposal: 1. Allow the existing ramp to be used for emergency purposes, will be open year-round. Owner will plow out for winter access with a road leading away from the channel. Also, parking lot will be plowed. 2. Establish and maintain a boat pump out service, located near the gas pump. 3. Install public telephones, located near the ramp. 4. Install publi'j restrooms, upgraded, in the office building, open 8 A.M. to 9 P. M. during the boating season. - continued LMCD Board 4/26/89 5. Allow the police and sheriff to use the aiarina's docks at two designated tie-on places, appropriately equipped and warked for police use only. This space could also be available for public agency use. 6. Provide 6 to 0 (later amended to 8) aluminum fishing boats, half of them motorized, if the City of Excelsior will so consent, or else provide an alternative location for public applicant's Maxwell Bay Marina. fishing boat and motor rer^rls at Currently there are 80 slips on the commercial property and 4 on the residential property. At the request ofthe City of Excelsior the four docks from the residential pro^‘*rt• will be assigned to the commercial property, with any future owner of the residential property to be assured a free slip at the marina. It was noted the commercial property has 810 feet of frontage and under the code can support 81 slips. The addition of leased shoreline from the City of Excelsior on Minnetonka Boulevard allows the expansion of the DUA to accommodate a longer dock. There was discussion regarding the zoning of the shoreline with Gilbert contending it is public property and Kelly stating it is park property. Frank Kelly, speaking for the City of Greenwood, discussed the configuration of the dock, stating the current dock is a pier dock while the proposed dock will be wider and longer, thus using more of the public waters of St. Alban's Bay. He indicated no objection to rebuilding of the current dock in the same location to correct any safety matters. He feels that by allowing the lease of shoreline to create dock use area will create a problem for the District in the future. Tobermann requirement. offered to amend his application to 81 slips to meet the 1x10 Alan Albrecht, Mayor, City of Greenwood, compared the dock size of the current dock (50* x 440* « 22000 sq. ft.) with the proposed dock (80* x 550* » 44000 sq. ft.) thus doubling the size of the dock. The LMCD Code as cited by the Executive Director, identifying the dock use area in Sec. 2.01, Subd. 2(a) as _ _ the area for sites bordering on the lake, extends into the lake a distance equal to the site Lake frontage to be measured at right angles to the side site lines ....not extending into the Lake distance greater than 100 feet .... which means the dock use area includes the distance from the 929.4' shoreline to 100' into the Lake. Before voting the following comments were aadc: Rascop: The Shorewood City Attorney said LMCD cannot have a commercial dock on public land, and he has been directed to vote against the proposal. Grathwol: Excelsior will comment whin it comes before them, but this plan is agreeable to them. - continued LHCD Board 4/26/89 Lefevre: Unless it can be shonn Excelsior does not have the right to lease the property, it would be extra-ordinary to deny the request on that basis. Sgt. Chandler: Request the Water Patrol slips be close to the south end of the dock, and the applicant agreed. ACTION The Motion was restated to indicate the request is for 81 slips and the anenities tj indicate there will be 8 rental boats. Foster, Grathwol, Hurr, Lewman and Reese voted aye. Bjorlin, Boswinkel, Cochran, Malinka, Pillsbury, Rascop and Martinson voted nay. The eotion to approve failed. Lefevre was directed to prepare findings to deny the application. Grathwol excused hinself from the Meeting. d. St^ Alban's Bay Marina 6 Yacht Club Environwental Assessnent Work Sheet, recommending the EAW as not required because the applicant is not expanding its dock use area. The Board declared this moot in view of the vote not to approve the Permit. e* Multiple Dock Temporary Extension Permit requests.. ’ s moved by Cochran, seconded by Reese, to approve the following Mult jck Temporary Extension Permits: » Format Arms Country Club Addition Homeowners Association, Orono. t Roger Mikner, Wayzata » A1 Ic Alma's Supper Club, Mound (applicant subsequently expecting to require 20* more length) » Cedarhurst Association, Deephaven, * Methodist Lakeside Assemby, Woodland, reconsideration of table action by committee based upon re-submission of mooring permit and dock plan. • Boulder Bridge Farm, Inc., Shorewood, Motion carried unanimously. f. Deicing permit deposit refunds as detailed in vouchers-to-be paid summary. It was moved by Cochran, seconded by Pillsbury, to approve permit deposit refunds as detailed in vouchers-to-be-paid summary. Motion carried unanifflously. LHCO Board 4/26/89 g. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Reese, to call a Public Hearing ^or 7:00 P. M. on May 24, 1909 at the Tonka Bay City Hall to consider the request of the Minnetonka Yacht Club and Lake Minnetonka Sailing School for a Special Density Permit and new dock license. Motion carried unanimously. C. ENVIRONMENT, EURASIAN HATER MILFOIL TASK FORCE, Chair Reese. a) Contract service bid award, Eurasian Hater Milfoil harvesting for contract service was presented per the attaciiei’ Resolution recommending Atlas Marine, a division of Atlas Foundation, Inc., as the most competitive bidder. Reese recommended Atlas Marine and submitted alternate work plans based on three and/or five harvesters. Funds available should permit harvesting through mid-August. This would permit harvesting up to 1700 acres out of approximately 3000 acres expected to be infested. Strommen elaborated that the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources will issue its initial permit for harvesting 500 acres two times a year. Individuals can harvest up to 2,500 square feet without a permit. It was moved by Reese, seconded by Rascop, to adopt a proposed Resolution in support of the recommendation to engage Atlas Marine, a Division of Atlas Foundation Co., as the most competitive bidder to conduct the cutting of aquatic weeds in Lake Minnetonka for the 1989 Boat Season, copy attached. Motion carried unanimously. Reese recommended purchasing a 52* conveyor for shallow areas and for increasing the number oi off-loading points. It was moved by Reese, seconded by Rascop, to authorize the Executive Director to advertise for bids for a 52* conveyor, estimating the cost less thab $25,000. Motion carried unanimously. b) Financial summary, fund raising Strommen reported all cities have contributed for a total of $84,338. There is $14,000 outstanding in pledges. The Wayzata Banks will sponsor a half marathon with estimated receipts of $12,000 - $15,000. This will total $240,000 - 1250,000 from smaller private and city sources. A Public Information program as to how, when and where weed cut this summer was suggested. will c) Task Force informational highlights Reese reported that Lake Minnetonka will be a test site for a new fungus whii.h has the possibility of disabling Eurasian Hater Milfoil. It is estimated any practical use would be at least five years away. 8 LHCD Board 4/26/89 Stro«men reported laboratory tests indicate a herbicide, SONAR, has a selectivity for the weed. The producer has donated thirty quarts to be used in ■four select bays on Lake Minnetonka. Reese shoned a proposal for thirty-second Carmichael Lynch, at outside expense reimburseraent c' in the Public Relations Budget approved for E.W.M. r. Hn DNR. A shoN date of late May is anticipated. TV spots, prepared by ?00. The amount already ; shared 507. Hith the 3. LAKE USE, Chair Pillsbury a) The minutes of 4/17/09 were approved as presented. b) Water Patrol report 1. Sgt. Chandler reported two more deputies have been added to the Water Patrol giving them four full time deputies. 2. The Wayzata Lions have donated 16,500 to the Water Patrol which will be used for water rescue equipment. 3. The first 3WI arrest of the year was made April 28. 4. The Water Patrol has two new boats. 5. Buoys will be all in by May 15. 6. The Water Patrol has received a 115,000 grant from the MN DNR for over-time service. That amount will allow seven day a week coverage. 7. Charter boat inspection has started 8. The court case on the assault of a deputy will begin May 17. One deputy has not been able to return to work. 9. The Water Patrol will have the capability to monitor Channel 16 this year, giving them better contact with on-shore activity. The Board directed the Executive Director to send a letter to the Hennepin County Sheriff's Department thanking them for the additional presence on the Lake. c) Temporary multiple dock extension, Minnetonka Boat Works, Wayzata, recommending approval for extension of 9 slips to 230’ utilizing permanent piling construction due t..: deep and turbulent waters for designated time of five years. It was moved by Pillsbury, seconded by Cochran to approve a temporary multiple dock extension for Minnetonka Boat Works, Wayzata, to permit an additional 9 slips to 238', utilizing permanent piling construction, with instruction to the Minnetonka Boat Works that they are to identify the nine docks they will not use and how they will be closed off. - continued LMCD Board 4/26/09 Rascop suggested the Board make a determination that a permanent dock is temporary if removed after five years. It was moved by Cochran, seconded by Pillsbury, to table the current motion temporarily. Discussion proceeded on the definition of the subject docks, i.e. pile driven docks vs. non-pile driven docks if of a seasonal nature. It was agreed that in this case they could be called non-seasonal docks. It was moved by Cochran, seconded by Bjorlin, to bring back the Resolution approving a temporary multiple dock extension of nine slips to 238' using a non-seasonal construction, due to water conditions in Wayzata Bay, for a designated time of five years or if the water does not return to 920.6, for a longer period until it does Notion carried unanimously. d) Minnehaha Creek Watershed District proposed dredging amendments and new Rule K requiring licensing of dredging contractors, recommending support for the dredging amendments, and new Rule E (dredging) It was reported the NCHSD has approved the changes. e) Special Event Permit It was moved by Rascop, seconded by Bjorlin, to approve the Don Shelby U. S. Invitational Bass Tournament, September 29 to October 1, 1989. Motion carried unanimously. f) Boat lift Relocation It was moved by Foster, seconded by Bjorlin, to approve lakeward extension of boat lifts, subject to Water Patrol criteria for buoys, with reflective markings on all sides and not a hazard to navigation. Motion carried unanimously. g) Liquor License Renewals It was moved by Pillsbury, seconded by Bjorlin, to approve temporary liquor licenses of John Lambin's Queen of Excelsior, Executive Charters and A1 t( Alma's, pending review of renewal applications by Hennepin County Sheriff and municipal law enforcement agencies. Motion carried unanimously. 4. ADVISORY COMMITTEE, Chair Ree^e, Consultant Arndorfer a) Subcommittee progress Arndorfer reported the Public Safety Plan draft has come out of sub committee. It is the third sub-committe plan to be drafted. Wetlands has had two meetings, the final one April 28. The first meeting of the Lake Use and Lake Access was combined April 20, but in the future tney will be separate. On shore has been re-scheduled, waiting for members to respond. - continued LHCD Board 4/26/89 SuMmer Monitoring is about to begin. A boat count to deternine hoM Ioh Nater affects the lake use will be analysed. There are five new sub-conuaittee starts plus the sueoier eonitoring progran presently being prepared. May is the third quarterly, report due to the Metropolitan Council, scheduled for the May 16. 5. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT a) Adainistrative Progress Stroaoen proposed activating c cers* review eeeting, between board Meetings, to discuss the raroifi. of public service and adoinistrative issues the District is dealin.; with. He suggested the meeting be open to all Board oeebers, held on a pre-scheduled basis. Hurr will work with Stro«me.i to set up a date with notice to ail Members and the public. b) The Executive Diretor's priority meetings and exchanges report will be Mailed to the Board. 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Upper Minnetonka Yacht Club/RDP Partners It was moved by Pi 11sbury,seconded by Cochran, to approve the Findings of Fact in the matter of the application of the Upper Minnetonka Yacht Club/RDP Partners for a new dock license, special density permit and variance as determined at a Public Hearing on December 17, 1980, as prepared by Attorneyt Lefevre. Motion carried, Rascop abstaining. 7. BUSINESS a) 1989 Dock License Renewals It was moved by Rascop, seconded by Cochran, to approve 32 applications for renewal of dock licenses, including Orders and stipulations, certificates having been received from the Villages. Motion carrie** unanimously. b) Temporary Extension Requests It was moved by Pillsbury, seconded by Lewman, to approve the following temporary dock extensions: Lyle Berman, Area 29, City of Wayzata from 100* to 200* subject to review by the Hater Patrol for possible navigation hazard condition Chimo Association, Area 34, City of Deephaven from 97‘ to 147* LHCD Board 4/26/89 The Harborage, Area 6, City of Victoria from 100‘to 120*, subject to non-interference with channel traffic on the south side (revaluation of WSU should take place at time of regular inspection) Moodend Shore Beach Association, Area 4, Hinnetrista From 80* to 964' Notion carried unanimously. 8. ADJOURNMENT There being i > further business, the Chair adjourned the meeting at 11:20 P. N. Submitted by: Jan BosHinkel, Secretary Approved by: JoEllen L. Hurr, Chair 0 • /CJV.'. cS Dl -ri0A> iJ/V-O'A) J U'-'-'' iz at^s-u^^ C'-ccf O-L Cl'^ IV T u , , i'.a.'s association ofmetropolitanmunicipalities o 5;30 P.M. Social Hour (Sponsored by Hiller & Schroeder Fin.» Inc.) 1989 AMM ANNUAL MEETING WHEN: WEDNESDAY, MAY 31, 1989 WHERE: MENDAKOTA COUNTRY CLUB 2075 Mendakota Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota (Map enclosed) 6:30 P.M. Sit Down Dinner (Prime Rib Or Broiled Walleyed Pike) 7:30 P.M. Annual Business Meeting (Agenda on Back) Cost: $20.00 Per Person SPOUSES, SIGNIFICANT OTHERS AND GUESTS ARE WELCOME COME AND HELP CELEBRATE THE AMM'S 15TH. YEAR ANNIVERSARY. WE HAVE INVITED AND EXPECT HOST, IF NOT ALL, OF THE 15 PAST PRESIDENTS TO BE PRESENT. PLEASE NOTE: 1. Dinner reservations, includ.tng entree choice, must be made by Tuesday, May 23. Please call Carol Williams at 227-4003. We would appreciate it if the reservations could be channeled through your City Manager or Administrator*s Office. 2. Please see special invifsi'.lon to tour the new Mendota Height's city hall as noted on back. 3. This notice has been mailed to Mayors, Councilmembers and Managers/Administrators. 183 university avenue east. st. paul. minnesota 55101 (612) 227-4008 CITY OFFICES MONTMAl I AVL MENDAKOTA DIRECTIONS* Mendakota Country Club ( ) (and the Mendota Heights City Hall ( O)) are easily accessible from numerous major highways. The entrance to the new Mendakota Club House 1§ well marked, but is eas/ to get to. Simply turn west off Dodd Road (T.H. 149) on Mendakota Drive, which is just south of the fire station. o Qro= FROM; Member City Officials Gary Bastian, President Neil Peterson, 1989 Nominating Committee Chair the Board of Directors by the unanimous The Board discussed and endorsed this is forwarding it to you for your consid- RE: Proposed By-Law Amendment A proposed By-Law Amendment was brought to request of the 1989 Nominating Committee, proposal at the May 4th. board meeting and eratlon at the May 31st. Annual Meeting. Effect of Proposed Amendment: Current language in By-Law Artlc'^.a Vll, Section 2 limits board members to two consecutive two-year terms unless elected to the presidency or vice-presidency. The proposed amendment would remove this limit for persons representing cities of the first class Proposed Amendment Wording: Article VII, Section 2 would read as follows: SECTION 2. OFFICERS* TERMS. i^^Offlcers shall be elected at the Annual Meeting of the Association and they shall V Jtake office June 1 following the Annual Meeting. The President and Vice-President shall each be elected annually for one-year terms, and the Directors shall be elected for two-year overlapping terms. Eight Directors elected in even numbered years and eight Directors elected in odd numbered years. The same person may not be elected to the office of President for more than two successive terms. The same person unless representing a city of the First Class shall not be elected to the Board for more than two consecutive two year terms or serve more than five years if first appointed by the Board or elected t the Annual Meeting to fill a vacancy, unless elected to the presidency or vice-presidency. Except for cities of over 75,000 population, when a director or officer leaves the Board of Directors for any reason, primary consideration for replacement will be given to member cities who have not been represented on the Board during the past 12 months. Rationale: The two terms limit was placed in the By-Laws in the late 1970*s to increase the opportunity for more cities to have Board representation. This provision has worked well and most AMM member cities have been represented on the Board at une time or the other. However, removing the two term limit for cities of the first class would not have any impact on other cities opportunity to be represented on the Board. Cities of the first class each have two automatic representatives on Board at all times as specified in Article VIII. Consequently, removal of the two term limit for representatives from cities of the first class has no impact on 'spreading* the 7>oard opportunities throughout the AMM membership. The proposed amendment was not ^^>^asked for or proposed by either of the cities of the first class within the AMM inember ship. o REPORT OF THE KONIMATING COMMITTEE TO! Member City Officials FROM: Neil Peterson, Nonimating Committee Chair RE: Committee Recommendations Pursuant to Article IX, Section 3 of cb* By-Laws, a Nominating Committee was appointed by the Board of Directors and is recommending the below listed persons for your consideration at the Kay 31st. Annual Meeting. FOR PRESIDENT: Walt Fehst, Manager, Robbinsdale (current Vice-President) FOR VICE-PRESIDENT: Larry Bakken, Councilmember, Golden Vr.lley (current Board Director) FOR BOARD DIRECTORS (Eight to be elected). Bonnie Balach Bill Bamhait Sharon Klumpp Bob Long Bemie Peroz Don Ramstad Craig Rapp Tom Spies Asat. to the Mayor Governmental Relations Rep. Administrator Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Manager Couacilmember St. Paul Minneapolis Oakdale (Incumbent) St. Paul (Incumbent) Burnsville Maple Grove (Incumbent) Hopkins Bloomington ^Additional candidates may be nominated from the floor at the meeting. CONTINUING BOARD MEMBERS: (Terms expiring May 1990). Karen Anderson Mark Bemhardson Dave Childs Ed Fitzpatrick Kevin Frazell Carol Johnson Gerald Marshall Gloria Vierllng NOMINATING COMMITTEE Linda Barton Jerry Dulgar Barry Johnson Carol Johnson Betty McCollxxm Neil Peterson Carolyn Voss Gene White Councilmember Minnetonka Administrator Orono Manager New Brighton Councilmember Fridley Administrator Mendota Heightss Councllci .mber Minneapolis Councilmember Brooklyn Park Councilmember Shakopee MEMBERS: Manager Burnsville Administrator Crystal Administrator Woodbury Councilmember Minneapolis Councilmember North St. Paul Councilmember Bloomington Councilmember Coon Rapids Councilmember Prior Lake c Alice RainviBe 'N.. >5 f S ■ kwJi // Council Minnesota Cities Sign up now The 1990s and beyond the future of Minnesota cities .O’ 1989 Annual Conference Registration O o . J Please type or prim Name __________ Nickname for badge Title ___________ Cit) or organization. Mailing address __ City ____________State Telephone (I Family members attending (No registtaiion fee BUT DOES NOT INCLUDE MEAL TICKETS. ORDER BELOW) Spouse full name Child________ Child________ Sex Age Age This is my first League of Minnesota Cities Annual Conference. FULL CONFERENCE Jur-e 6-9. 1989 Registration includes admission to all st'sions and tickets for Wednes day exhibitors luncheon, Thursday luncheon. Thursday banquet, aiid Friday coffee and rolls. MINI-CONFERENCE , June 8. 1989 i Registration includes admission to ' all Thursday sessions. Mayor's luncheon and coffee. (DOES NOT I include the Thursday banquet. I Order tickets for the banquet below. Early Registration (Postmarked by May 15, 1989) SI50 Full Conference G______ S65 Mini-Conference S______ Advance Registration (Postmarked by .May 30. 1989) SI75 Full Conference S________ S75 Mini-Conference S________ On-Site Registration (at Conference) I SI95 Full Conference S_ I S85 Mini-Conference S_ Extra Meal Tickets $15 Wednesday Exhibitor's Lunch S. S!7 Thursday Mayor's Luncheon S. S25 Thursday Banquet S. City contact Daytime phone #. Feel free to duplicate for multiple registrations. L General Information Every delegate, guest, speaker, media representative, and other attendees MUST REGISTER with this form. Complete the form in full and return it along with full payment of all appro priate conference registration fee to address indicated. NOTE: No registration will be proc essed without payment in full, or with out an accompanying city voucher or purchase order. II. Conference Registration Dead lines May 15. 1989: Final postmark dead line for Early Registration. May 30. 1989: Final postmark dead line for Advance Registration. III. Conference Registration Cancellation Policies Your letter of registration cancellation must be postmarked no later than May 30.1 989 to qualify for a refund of reg istration fees. A registration cancellation is subject to a S10 cancellation fee. IV. Special Needs If you are disabled and require special services, or if you have special dietary needs, please anach a written descrip tion. V. Registration Confirmation Pre-registrants will receive a postcard acknowledgement to be presented at the advance REGISTRA'nON desk for qu ’ck registration. VI. For more information For more information contact:Cuthy Dovidio (612) 227-5600. Make check payable and return with form to League of Minnesota Cities. 183 University Avenue East St. Paul. MN 5510 1 . ' Tuesday. June 6 Preliminary program schedule Thursday. June 8 Special Kick-OfT Program: Opening NighI Evening on the Town: Dinner and En'erluinment 6:30 p m. Wednesday. June 7 Welcomc/Opening Session: Discovering the Future of Minnesota 9:00 a.m.-l6:l5 a.m. Concurrent Sessions I (choose one) 10:30 a.m.-ll:45 a.m. Roic.s/communication —council, commissions and staif Comp wonh»how to maintain job evaluation and job salaiy programs Truth in taxation Development strategies policy committee Exhibitors* lunch 11:45 u.m.-l:l5 p.m. General Session 1:15 p.m.-2:l5 p.m. Concurrent Sessions II (choose one) 2:30 p.m.-3:30 p.m. Ethics in city government Employee benefits part 1 trends, responses, legal requirements, cafeteria plans Regional facilities-benefits and pioblcms for host communities General legislation policy committee Concurrent Sessions III (choose one) 3:45 p.m.-4:40 p.m. City management-past, present, and future (spen- fys sored by Minnesota City Management AssociMiom Employee benefits pan II city case studies Tax increment financing; uses and abuses Election and ethics policy committee “Wine Down** reception in exhibit area 4:40 p.m. City night renaissance festival 6:.30 p.m. Concurrent Sessions IV (choose one) 9:00 a.m.-l():.30 a.m. Strategic or long-range planning Sexual and racial harassment Solid waste (including recycling and household hazardous waste) Revenue sources policy committee Concurrent Sessions V (choose one) 10:45 a.m.-1 2:15 p.m. Collaborative planning/partnerships Changing values and employee motivation II I Providing police protection for small cities Legislative update Mayors Association/.VIini Conference l.'mcheon 12:30 p.m.-2:00 p.m. Terry Goddard. NLC president, mayor. Phoenix. Arizona Concurrent Sessions VI (choose one) 2:15 p.m.-3:30 p.m. Taking leadership to avoit liabilhy (LMCIT) ■4 Employee discipline and termination Financial health for small cities Land use. energy, environment, and iransponation League Annual Meeting 3 45 p.m. # LMC Reception and Banquet 6:30 p.m. Keys Leadership for the L future Friday, June 9 Beverages and Rolls 8:.30 a.m. Managing the employee | of the future Finale general session 9:30 a.m. Challenges for the future L.MC Legislative track E^^mmmmmMMimm ^mm^i sm. •. '. .M^^toAMOciation^fCity Attorneys- ^^^teraonjre^ent \* \ Holiday Inn Downto^^VDome __ Lany Minton, Vice President — " Cash Bar, Lunch. Business Meeting Curtis Fischer, Trusts Friday, June 9,11:30 a.ra.-4:00 p.ra. *" Psul Haug^Trustee •i © Conference kick-off A Iior-time, -do\\-htown .tonight, Tuesday, June 6, 7 p.m. onvrarS. •. Dovs'Tito'v^Ti Minneapolis -, - m City oiMinneyolis to conJtUKtton p^'S?»VFot^is^“ town councfl mvites aU Ua^e co»^erenM on w^two ^ coUeagues at ;n:“TirFK.‘?/ss2iS»^^’’•a fp s“S^ T.riES'Sb!rsr>i« includes rhythm and blues, niehtclub event two more clubs downtown - The Padhc Club in the Ruby’s is a cabaret which is a hybnd ^^!*^®®" Lumber Exchange and Jukebox Saturday Night !««««•. ■ - r“ '“• °r Before the main event you are invited to *“^® ®^°S^e"seSng^ at Ruby’s and the Fine Line is limited. no. I Pto»e indicate on the conference registration a first and “freebie,” (he restaurants are putting forth a number of second choice. ■ Econoiriisi zq discuss crencs facing ciues William Freund, chief economist emeritus of the New York stock exchange, will address the LMC conference on Wednesday. June 7. He comes to the League foUowmg a featured presentation at the 1989 National League of Cities (NLC) Conference. He will discuss the economic issues trends facing cities in the next decade and beyond. His remarks will focus on what policy^ers can do to make better decisions for their communities. Dr. Freund is one of the nation ’s most respected economists. Known for his keen eye, broad perspectwe. and sense of humor. Dr. Freund has the ability to discuss economic matters in a clear and lively fashion. ^ The New York Tunes dies him as a “unique economist because he' 'knows the practical worid of bu^ess and finance as wen as the world of research and academia.’ ’ Sylvia Porter refers to him as "the brilliant chief economist.” As senior vice president and chief economist of the New York stock exchange the past 18 years. Dr. Freund has supervised economic forecasts for business and mdustry, tax reform, productivity growth, and the future of Amer^ business. He has been an advisor to the governor of New Jersey for 20 years, and is diairman of the Center for In ternational Business. He is author of the best-selling book. Investment Fundamentals, and co-authored the recently-published. People and Productivity, a study on the managenient of human resources. His views on economics and fiimce appear regularly in the WaU Street Journal, and the New York Times, and numerous financial journals. Dr. Freund ’s business commentary c^ be heard on natioiially syndicated public broadcasts. He is alw a frequent guest on the “MacNeil-Lehrer Business Hour whicli airs weekdays on public tele\Tsk)n. Dr. Freund ’s experiences both as a public and pm’ate sector economist make him a valuable speaker for this year’s conference. ■ May 1989 OFFICE OF CITY COUNCIL 307 CITY HALL MINNEAPOUS. MINNESOTA 55415 PHONE 348-2211 STEVE CRAMER COUNCIL MEMBER ELEVENTH WARD TPWcWr\ IdKl]dfi m t (BljfilfOfflta Mayor Grabek Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mayor Grabek: I am aware oF some discussion with Hennepin County about the effect of the Minneapolis ordinance restricting food and beverage packaging on recycling. Hennepin County Commissioner Randy Johnson, for one, has suggested the ordinance would be inconsistent with his proposal (yet to be considered by the full Board) to add plastics as a required and reimburseable item in local recycling programs. In fact, the Minneapolis ordinance and an aggressive move into recycling of plastics are highly complementary. For your information, I have attached a recent letter to Commissioner Johnson explaining why this is true. The ordinance creates an incentive for public and private parties to not only stirt plastics recycling, but to work together to sustain the effort over time through effective market development. This incentive exists because to not recycle plastics such as HOPE milk jugs or two-litre PET soda containers means those items will be restricted through regulation, an outcome many people would like to avoid. For those forms of plastics for which there is not a viable re-use market at this time, the ordinance doesn't simply ignore the potential environmental hazards they raise. Instead, it regulates their use so that more environmentally benign alternatives are used when are where possible. I hope these thoughts are helpful as we at the local level toil to make recycling and other solid waste management strategies work. Sinc;iirely, ^Steve Cramer, Council Member City of Minneapolis OFFICE OF CITY COUNCIL 307 CITY HALL MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55415 i PHONE: 348*2211 STEVE CRAMER COUNCIL MEMBER ELEVENTH WARD (i54jy elf Date April 25, 1989 The Honorable Randy Johnson Hennepin County Board of Commissioners 2400 Governriient Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 Dear Commissioner Johnson; I read v.'ith great interest your press release on plastic recycling. While I support inclusion of plastic as part of the County's reimbursement program and the move toward a "Materials Recovery Facility", I take issue with several obsei ations you make. I can assure you the City is noc interested in withdrawing from the County's reimbursement program and turning down $2 million. Quite to tne contrary, I and other Council Members consider our current recycling program and the packaging ordinance comp1 erne.itary. The ordinance creates an incentive for all concerned parties, public and private, to work together to recycle as much plastic as economically feasible.Don't give up on the hope that some industry dollars can be garnered to help cities move into plastic recycling. This may not have to be an entirely taxpayer funded obligation! The ordinance also permits us to deal with forms of plastic packaging which can't economically be recycled. As I have mentioned to you, I'm not at all certain the market for anything beyond HDPE and PET is strong enough at this time for the County to economically >^eimburse cities for collecting plastic. If I'm wrong, or if you choose to proceed anyway, that's fine. However, if I'm right, then enforcement of the packaging regulation will be necessary and useful as we in Minneapolis attempt to manage the solid waste stream to minimize potential hazards. Again, your proposed policy doesn't supercede our ordinance until the day every form of plastic food and beverage packaging is recycled; a day I don't believe we have yet reached. Until that day, the initiatives are complementary in my estimation. Thanks for taking the time to let me know about your proposal ahead of time last week. Despite my concerns about your press release, I'll be happy to work with you and your colleagues on the issue of plastic recyclii erely, SC:ar cc: Henpcpin County Commissioners e Cramer Council Member, 11th Ward AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER rfi it —'' «/hTU^ TTVA'OiCE (8121 348-2151 '■"4 N VT o MINUTES )NKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONJ EXCELSIOR STUDIO 5:00 P.M. TUESDAY, APRIL 18, 1989 V i±3 u L_ i r J 1 JlV HAT 9B69 SION yJ I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Haggerty called the April 18, 1989 meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. ROLL CALL Directors Present Jim Olds Tom Anderson Dennis Haggerty Bari Brancel Others Present Jennifer Watts - Admin. Shelly Quaas - Recorder Ric Hanson - Triax o II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION 4.18.89.1: Anderson moved, seconded by Brancel, to approve the minutes of March 21, 1989 as written. Motion carried unanimously. III. REPORTS A. OFFICERS Chairman Haggerty informed the Commiiision that a Treasurer is needed for the Executive Committee, if anyone is interested they should contact Chair Haggerty. Nominations will be open at the full commission meeting in May. B. TREASURER Olds mentioned to the Commission that the balance on the Just Claims differs from last month's balance due to a small deposit that was overlooked. MOTION 4.18.89.2: Olds moved, seconded by Brancel, to approve the Just Claims as written on Appendix A. Motion carried unanimously. C. ADMINISTRATOR Administrator Watts informed the Commission that a Thank you note has been received from the Carver Community Library for the memorial that was given for Mary Smith. Watts explained to the Commission that she had spent approximately 4 hours with Holly Hansen for training purposes, she would like to use the remaining hours to get more information from Hansen on the legal history of the Franchise. Twelve surveys have been returned regarding a possible change in LMCCC's meeting night. Of those twelve surveys, Tuesday*s at 5:00 p.m. seems to the most favorable. Watts updated the Commission on the status of the Joint Powers Amend?«ent. The City of Woodland has not yet returned the Resolution and Greenwood has passed the fitst article and has not yet passed the second article. Watts will contact the two cities to follow up on their progress. LMCCC Minutes April is, 1989 Page 2 IV. V. REPORTS - CONTINUED D. TRIAX Ric Hanson of Triax reviewed his monthly report: Ending Basic Subsribers 5090 Basic Penetration 46% Total Pay units 3803 Basis Subscriber gain 9 Pay Units gain 135 Hanson informed the Commission that Triax is continuing door to door sales plus telemarketing and in the first week of May a HBO/Cinemax direct mail will be received by subscribers. Olds asked Hanson if there has been a channel change ^ rJing Cinemax. Hanson explained to Olds that Cinemax was r.rved to Channel 22 and the Sports Channel replaced the space where Cinemax was. The rapid change was due to dealings with Midwest Sports Channel, as soon as the deal was made Triax immediately put Midwest Sports on the Cinemax channel and bumped Cinemax to channel 22. Hanson informed the Commission that the subscribers will be informed through their next billing statement. Hanson Iso mentioned that Cinemax will stay on Channel 22, subscribers will no longer need a special convertor box to receive Cinemax, due to positive traps that have been installed in the system. Hanson informed the Commission that there may be extra funds allocated for capital expenses. If any special equipment is needed. Administrator Watts should contact Triax. 1988 FINANCIAL AUDIT MOTION 4.18.89.3: Anderson moved, seconded by Olds, to accept the offer from W.F. Denny Company to perform the 1988 financial audit. Motion carried unanimously. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Administrator Watts questioned the Commission on the next step for the Technical audit. The Commission requested Administrator Watts to contact Ric Hanson of Triax and request Triax's most recent audit and other information that would be helpful in the technical audit. Olds questioned the fact that Triax made channel changes without contacting the Commission. feels the Commission should be aware of all channel changes and Triax should follow this procedure by contacLinci the Commission. He also questioned the P.E.G. (Public, Educational and Government) channels and wonders how safe they are in the channel Tine-up. The Commission directed Watts to contact the Attorney and gat his view on the P.E.G. channels aid what to do tc 'void future conflict. o mccc Minutes April 18, 1989 Page 3 MOTION 4.18.89.4; Anderson moved, seconded by Brancel, to direct Administrator Watts to contact Triax and inquire about the placement of the 3rd P.E.G. channel as it is no longer on the current channel line-up; and to also consult with the Attorney to write an objection to the current channel line-up. Motion carried unanimously. VII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION 4.18.89.5; Haggerty moved, seconded by Brancel, to adjourn the April 18, 1989 meeting at 5:50 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully Submitted, Shelly Quaas Recorder o f- fWiews on school jinances uirea on cable .TV call-in program q Judy Soukup i The Weslonka School Board nired its rinancial concerns on tele- kjsion Ihts week in a cable-cast, fcall'in program hosted by , the UMyor of Mound, Steve Smith. Monday night's hour-long pro- 11, broadcast on Triax Cable's jnnel 20 and directed by Linda liien, featured Westonka Su- ^jrintendent Jim Smith and the ,aeven-memlicr school board •serv- jJbig as a panel to address questions fof in-studio and at-home guests. L The program was designed to fprovide a new medium for describ- iiiig the complete financial picture of fthe Westonka SchiHil District and j for answering questions that may I not have been answered in other rdUcussioni. The Westonka School jDistrict had seen two excess levy ^ferenda fail ’ at fail. : * Board membcni, the superinten dent and the mayor all agreed that ‘ fttie dialogue was valuable and that they'd like to use the television pro- igram to communicate with citizens again soon, probably after Memori;' ;'al Day. **Television is a useful tool lIo reach out with information." •hoted Mayor Smith. The mayor In dicated he hopes to build audience interest in participation in the first ------------------------ II • ■ cmi|iie of shows, and then move on to "pick apart" the responses and the issues that are rai.scd so the au dience can come to some conclu- .siuns on tlie need for an excess i levy. Some callers on this first program recalled negative stories of other .referenda attempts and distrust of board members; others called in .siippiMi of the hiiard and their ef forts to communicate and asked why city officials were slow in coming t«i .suppr^rt the school’s efforts. Callers rai.scd que.stions alxnit how the district's funds were allo- cutcil. asking for a graph that would show the di.siributitm of funds. They askal about costs expended for co-curricular activities like sports and mu<ic. and they asked about nego *ons over salary in creases ai.u whether there were morale problems among the .staff. Tlieir tuicstions showed concerns over a board decision to eliminate funding for swimming pool opera tions (which have'now beei^as- ‘sumed by Community Education). They asked how a person on a fixed ;ncome could be expected to pay in creasing properly taxes. In their respon.ses, -*n- beri and administra aid detailed financial information was available to anyone who asked, that they have circulated and publicized that information ind would con tinue to do so. More than 50 per cent of high-school-age students participate in co-curricular activi ties, they responded, and cn- curriculars amounted to about four percent of the budget. But the board considers sports and music and art to be vital puts of the whole educar tional process, snd they want to offer as many opportunities as pos sible in those areas. Cuts in co- curricular to date have amounted to $S7,(X)0, they said. The district is trying to keep cuts as far away from ■ I FINANCES . . . Cont. on P. B ’89 Operation Clean Sweep will be held on 6th of May It is time once again to get out your work gloves and get ready to clean up area streets and parks in "Operation Clean Sweep spon> iuiriciu . MMff'tnd oUierstafr mdnbitl^ r ^6f the difficult tlmts, andj^ . Pederttkm of Telchers lA^ rCL’I.fiaoMguAitchbiMbylhet^ ,financial dlfficuhles But the board also expressed sup*' thN come from the s portfbrteachefiwhoaeialarksa^ . * S.* ' * on. mandates that come from the state unaccom- •V • ....^...... - . . ♦, .•• •*’ . ‘ t ' ... . i. .. . *. '• ' panied by ftmdhg. . - J And some of the pro|rams fhai Cailen assumed eterC {mid out of ‘ distrki coffisn,Mika trips ip Camp Isabella (EnVirbnmental Uaming Center) an^ toe roller skating rink. ' were actually ftwded by student-' and parent-spoiiaored ftindralscre, the board pt^nt^ out.. ‘ . :t ■ :• I o m MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE SCHOOL OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT HELD ON APRIL 24, 1989 The regular meeting of the School Board of Orono Independent School District No. 278 was held on Monday, April 24, 1989. Present: David McKown Don Anderson Kitty Crosby James Franklin John Maresh Lucie Taylor Thomas Mich William Fenholt UPON MOTION by Lucie Taylor, seconded by John Maresh, the consent agenda was approved as follows: - approved the minutes of the March 15,1989 - approved the minutes of the March 21.1989 - approved the minutes of the Apri 1 11.1989 regular special special meeting; meeting; meeting; approved the following coaches for spring sports: A1 Kreb, head baseball coach; Brian Bergstrom, assistant baseball coach; Kevin Sharpe, assistant baseball coach; Scott Zeidler, assistant softball coach; Amy Luesebrink, assistant softball coach; Chandra Mallampalli, assistant tennis coach; Liz Young, head track coach; Kevin Rose, assistant track coach; Bill Greenwood, assistant track coach; approved Nancy Thayer's request for a one year leave of absence commencing June 30, 1989; accepted the resignation of Jann L. Van Airsdale, special education teacher at Schumann Elementary School, effective at the end of the 1988-89 school year; Report for February and March, 1989; - - . ___ Report for the third quarter, 1988-89; approved the bills as covered by vouchers 062347 through 062558 and 061530 through 061719. approved approved Or. Mich reported that ' teachers, Dave McKown, Marge Gasch and he had been In attendance at a ral ly to:' }ght, sponsored by AMSD, at the Capitol supporting funding for suburban school districts and he also provided them with infornation on property tax changes from 1980-81 through 1987-88; that the middle school dance unit was concluded with a "dress up day" last week and it was a great suc cess; that six candidates are now being interviewed for the high school prin- cipalship; that a staff development day was held on April 14 with a presentation from the business community given by David Crosby, George Dixon and Bill Lurion, a session on nutrition and a session on the right to privacy act; that ne con ducted the Elements of Effective Instruction workshop on April 11 and 12; that on April 12 and 13 Dr. Ernest Stachowski worked with the administrators on supervision of teachers; that the position of principal of Orono Primary School has been posted and applications will be taken until May 15; that the prom will be held on May 12 at the Lafayette Club; that a workshop should be held on May 8 on the mission statement and goals; that he wanted to review the comolaint pro cedure with the Board as this was requested at the Teacher Meet and Confer meeting. Or. Mich presented a certificate of recognition from the Minnesota School Boards Association to James Franklin honoring him for his participation In over 100 hours of MSBA sponsored programs and activities. Don Anderson requested that Orono's HTI representatives provide Information to the Board in response to the articles on vocational schools that are appearing In the newspaper. This will be done at a future meeting. Jim Franklin briefly reported to the Board on the NSBA Convention which was held In Anaheim, California In April. Lucie Taylor expressed apprecUlion tc El 11 Fenholt and his staff on the financial data which the Board received. Dave McKown reported on the Teacher Meet and Confer meeting which was held on April 18, 1989. Some of the items that were discussed Included principal selection policy, complaint review procedure, class size, transfer policy and the new schedule proposal. Kitty Crosby reiterated the agreement to review the procedure followed for transfers as outlined cnder the guidelines of the letter of transfer to assure that the correct process had been followed. Dr. Mich stated that this is in the process oT being reviewed. Nancy Brantingham presented the Board with a letter from the Chemical Health Advisory Council requesting that as the process for hiring the Orono High School principal occurs, the importance of chemical health issues be kept in mind. John Whitman, representing a group of high school basketball parents, presented the Board with information which he had compiled and requested to be placed on the agenda for the May 8 Board meeting. Dr. Mich stated that he would examine the materials presented and that he would, under the direction of the school attorney, advice the chairman as to discussion guidelines the Board should follow concerning this matter. Bill Fenholt Introduced Luther Felstad, Springsted consultant. Mr. Felstad pre sented background Information to the Board regarding the sale of the school building bonds. He Informed the Board that according to the Municipal Credit Report done by Moody's Investors Service, 0»*ono School District received an A1 rating based on the fact that there Is no debt, there Is a good tax base so a good profile could be presented, and the district finances/records have been administered very well. The Clerk presented affidavits showing publication of notice of call for bids on $2,735,000 General Obligation School Building Bonds, Series 1989A of the District, for which bids were to be received at this meeting, in accordance with the resolution adopted by the School Board on March 21, 1989. The affidavits were examined, were found to comply with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, and were approved and ordered place on file. The Board then proceeded to receive and open bids for the sale of the Bonds. The following bids were received: Bids and RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID ON SALE OF $2,735,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BUILDING BONDS on file in District Office. Following the adoption of the resolution, Mr. Felstad Indicated that the 7.2157% effective Interest rate from Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, the lowest bid received was an excellent rate, below the original estimates and that Orono taxpayers would be the beneficiaries. Therefor, the actual annual cost of the bond Issue win be slightly below that publicized In the referendum brochure. UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the Board of Education received the school day schedule as presented and set an open hearing for parents to comment on the schedule at 7:30 p.m.. May 8. The proposed school schedule follows: Grades Starting Time Ending Time Length of Day H.S. (9-12) 7:30 2:05 6 hours 35 minutes Int./M.S. (5-8) 8:10 2:45 6 hours *♦“ 35 minutes Int./Elem. (2-4) 9:05 3:25 6 hours 20 minutes Primary (K-1) 9:15 3:15 6 hours Kindergarten : 9:15 - 11:45 12:45 - 3:15 Or. Mich provided background Information on pending legislation which would negatively Impact our school district. He stated that excess levy referenda is mainly sought to maintain programs In the face of Inadequate funding and the option of school boards/community members to do this Is now In jeopardy because of the actions of the legislature to cap excess levy referenda. Dr. Mich stated that local control Is being eroded and that much work must be done to Influence legislators to write a law that would assist suburban districts. Discussion ensued regarding concerns/lnformatlon on equity funding. Dr. Mich provided information for the Board regarding computer purchases for 1989-90. Board approval of these computer purchases would provide a second com puter lab at the middle school, provide networking for the high school lab, memory kits for the business lab, a printer for elementary and a Macintosh system for the coordinator. Following this major purchase for 1989-90, the plan will be to budget an amount each year (1990-91 on) to permit replacement of computers. UPON NOTION by Lucie Taylor, seconded by John Naresh, the Board of Education approved the purchase of technology equipment as follows: PROPOSED DISTRICT COMPUTER PURCHASES on file In District Office. The Board received the 1989*90 proposed budget for study/review and were encouraged to call Bill Fenholt If they have questions. The budget will be discussed and adopted at the Nay 8 meeting. UPON NOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Lucie Taylor, The School Board Increased lunch program prices for 1989-90 for students and adults in accordance with the administrative recommendation which Is based on. revenue required to retain fiscal solvency In this fund. The new schedule for lunch prices follows: LUNCH PRICES FOR 1989-90 Grades 1-3 4-8 9-12 Adults 10 lunch tickets 5 - 10 - 10 lunch tickets $11.50 ($1.15) 6.25 (SI.25) 13.00 ($1.30) 20.00 ($2.00) Single $1.20 " 1.30 “ 1.40 " 2.00 Student Milk - chocolate and white, 204 Malted Milk - 6 oz.. 354 UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the School Board accepted the following four recently established scholarshipship awards: SCHOLARSHIP AWARDS on file in District Office. UPON NOTION by John Naresh, seconded by Don Anderson, tiie meeting was adjourned. Approved: a Jr:rcJ2Ks:s'ss:'£5Ssis^yc ‘^ 5th-grade DARE graduate! pledge to remain drug-free ■» Pnaj M. Kaof Suft Wnicr E'«*< Ph«ot by Joty McL«r Ambn Otoiidt rrurihcti lo the inirti>rhoof ind p«c rtatont »hy ihc Kitl not ukr ^up "1 hrt could kill me." the ntd "I could k>K Ihendi.” 1 htn. the nfih pndcr made ■ peomiic, "I piomiie ne*ff to lake o* uic ilirpi drup." the uid Se>rn other itudenii made limilar commttmrnu brfuet an audremr rf mote than JiO patenw. city onkialv **“ PC»v>nnel. leathcn muliipurimte toom at Sonnrtyn Elemenury School in New Hope. The) «ete -hmen to make the eommiimentt orally from amon| the 111 chtldten in the Khool who pied(rd to retiuin dni| fttc. The tounptert were the flrat iraduiiet of New Hope Polne ncfunment * DARE (Droy Abtnr RcMiianre Education) Pripam. Anothri KIO youtht yradualed Vkrdneida) at Meadow Uke Elementary Sc lioolandanoiher III) will padualc loday at New Hof« Ekmcnury School Similar paduatinnt art Ukiny place around >ne 1 w m C itiet thit month ai mme than .VWIO fifth yriden i>ber police dmnmeiiti that oAEr DARE include Anoka. Coon Rnmdt. Ctytial. Elk Rivet (la iti Keo<Ml ywE Miancapolit. Motiad and S' Botulhciul/Miancirtita. laid Huah i>etham. a 11-yca/ veteran of the M-nneapolit Police Depanmt.li and a mcmlKT of ita DARE Unit Many citicn will atari the protram le the itil. Indudin| Sprtni Lake Par>. BkMminiton. St Paul, Brooklyn Ceilei, f^mpljw Orono and Prior Lai c. The Minneapolii DARE Unit includei pi rail time officen and a wpemior Three more offircn art trained and waitiny to enter the prncram, FVetham i id la lU fK« backstage look at Guthrie I divsM'.v M« Mil' 'iitii lij ^ tilioi'l tp< ml'tit I* tji Kui "I lin* •••h IrxfK tnf niir. h fl ihjl moiiT) »» rut f''in» U’4ihii>» Uudrnu M>rn woulil lilr to Vf tuU in Mlininiwijiivr talaii«\ (r«rt ad- immitraion. ichoiil p^'nripaU »tlh (ORihtnrd •dminniialivr and irach- inf dulwt and a rurmutum (uruKd on ctxr lubirtik “My pnontm art adminiriraiivt ri- ctM and nonacadrniH prufiami I •on'l f»rn ronridt* rvllint itK-hm. I »ooM lend (hat kind ot propnul iMck 10 Ihr draninf board. ’ br uid. Atibouih ibf • rrfrrrndum rtvall, Kit'y Franren uid ibe. like «brr diUnct Uipayerv rr wondennt rf Uk acboul boa^ n apcadioi rme- a I hi’ k'* iHin I'm II lia< lo br «ithin what mir t un aHoi^l ' Oi' Barbara lordal Vrine\ agfrrd that Utra aie lun.in( prorb pjrlKuUil) irlireeA to move out o( IbMnu 'Ih “Ahool TV prurm ol the prnpb- in the diMnci d»>n I ha*r kiiU in llie iLbiiolt 1 hrtt'l toll o( ronfuuun and dikiniai on their pan and ihe> nini •onirhody to lepreirnt them." the tanl If elected, the nould puth for grealei accountability in ichool ipemlinf and more comitiumcanon betneen Ihr ichdof board and area leudeniv “Peopte need to be more imlrtrn- dem, do their o»a thinking and dr* Sui.'ii Nie'- li. tift fv*,|. I--, 1 ri'liif tt»i"'lil »I'f'it till'" ii* II ' 141'm I ll'.ti. It I . |l I . Mini i.imiKi.i n. s ai '111 it hm Male ha»e had to g • rrliuiHluni lun-t ing and that i not hcvau>c 'it in> tpomiMe ti’r odi'if “ thi vinl. Rr veiting Miiintn'nl.11 vln li rifcnn- dum II niH a nintahti wtuiioii lln' tat pioblrm. th< uid \ top prunui for Nenberti i\ grltinr pntrnli in- tolled nilh rdutation and the viid the nould pirmnie inlunir<-r pn«- gramt amt lurffaim run »iih noindt funding 10 eiihanie parrni iniolic- mrni ' I I Mini - Ionia lUiiiii. i T'M lit'i’ i.indiil'iC' I'lrd Im Ih-i Ihn-. >141 Icinii Juili l.i't'i 'k<ki)t\ .nij tide Rd riieiin*<. Kaihy Caimn Ml ri,^I All .nJ VjfrTr*.* ke‘ Mul'binulaU IIWlKIrl }ai|-‘ gh..4 ►**’«rVbtOUIMI «l DARE ( friim mc* I> iK* Kn n otU u *j Ih fi4i» M ifi rvrr> iiNif ' Theater CawMard lra« pact lY laad thfigiu. the Guihne't aitiiuc direeioe, ttmtiap a commitment to teach yotutg pcoptc to appceciatc ibe- Bicr. "Tbere oai a penBiar reaching ovt.’* Litowiky laid. ~l feh the nimuleiion of Tyrone Utrilinc betag icluadkd •ad reiaveaated.*' He Ihra coneeteed and prnpeiaed the prapram. ohich part Mudra'i wde by aide adth actorv direcion and cot- lame. K1 and kiting devgnrn The tiadean aho Itara ahoai the aadi* lioa proettv the dillrrente between cqaily and noarquify anon and the ndet aa actor wort* by. They meet with the ihnler'i dramalurg. the in- boate critic, at wth at Ike public lelaiioat director. Gaihrir penoa ael ««re receptive to the idea —•The letuh it aa incteate in the qual ity of the rciaiioBthip between the •rtitt and the audmicc.’* Mid Sheila Litingtton, fdaeation coordinator at theOulhric. Becautr there wat room (hr only 20 tiudentt ia the program. Liiowtky and Guthne pmonnel were Klectue about whom they chotr They looked over more than 170 applicaiiont be- lore making their decitiont. which they bated oa aiiendancc, gradet aad teacher ttcomaiciidationi. Danielle Lelchok, a junior trhn it involved in playt at tchool. Mid the wanted to pn a firtt-haad look at Ihc bariaeaa ‘ I want to he aa ictren,'* Lekhuk Mid. “and I decided I would proha- My be a better ictrett If I could find out about everything that goci along with it." Lelchuk Mid the hat hern impeetted with the organiraiion and iprcialira- bon of Ike then let. “Each penon here it an etpert in their A^“ the Mid. For Jndion Pyle, alto a junior, taking part meant aMing tome divenity to lut cwnculum. “People are tinivi uying 'keep tout 0M>oni open ' thit juti givrt you more opiionv'' Pyle mk). Lelchuk Mid ibe Ihealet ollcrt tome- thing for everyone. “If you're into electronm, they'te got a compoienred light hoard If you want to be a icamtimi ihcre't the cottume tbop . T hen there t the buunc'.i atpKl and the arehitec- lural atpect There's jutl all lorlt of MuIT." the o At GATE otembm become more familiar with the Gulhnc they will evemuatly be leading toun ol the theater and wtH help, preieni “1 h- Magic of the Uulhne." a travelii . pretentaiinn giien In citk gmvpt and Khoolt that liacct the hitlory of Ihc Gulhrir. uting ptopt and cot- luinet from pati p^uctiont. yrai 111. ri'f'' ah-'iii t '»**lilll MmiK-ipolit iHihlif tihivil. t'i> pt lliil-n I triiirniaiy Sihin4. anJ ntnM piiixhiat it hoolt in iln cili Half llif tlodi ntt hate gradiuted (iiaduaimn ceremm ict lor tin other hall »iH K-gm in iwo weelt Ibf DIRE prngiam wat tuiteil in I'K* at a pnni poiet i hclveen the Lm Anyelet I’olicr Dcpaitmeni and Ihc lot Anfclet I ^nilied S< hoot iHtmcl lit aim it deierTetKe “II I a potilite drug program." Mid Ron Bird. DARI inilructof at the Ne« Hope Police Drpanmrni "M hai »r lani to do it grt lu ihe kid« hefoie they hate tiprrimentrd with drvgt We know that moti kidi airn'i et|icnmcming wtih dtup at age lOand II." Ai ihai age. Mudenit alio ate mote apt to litten to a police oirnri “I gel huft from my kidt ai tchool " he Mill “ I hey » am lo hold m> hand 1 hev want lo ulk lo me 1 het don't mind bring teen talking with me ll't nhi to cool when you're in junior high ichool." Foi one hour raih week, finh-giadcrt air Uufht Irttont on diug uir and mitutr conteqiienret ol uting drugt hn» In mill olfrn of droft how to hnild irtf^eem. media inlluencri on drug utc. ntk uking how lo form a tujiporl lyttrm and how lo take a lund In the latl tettion. itudcnlt made verbal commiimenit not lo do drugt Bud viid ih it when Ihr pu-gtam hi-f.in timli r.lt wrir h-tilani “It wat a W4'i and v.i atiuudr “ Miihin fnui wiilt hiKtifr tiudi lilt jumped mill diKutMimt Ih. piiifiani alto includct a irttion foi jvitrnit Sctetal DARE intiriKioft tiid lhai Ihrt would like lo ICC mii-c ptien't imolied In New llnjic N-lween W and N* parer.lt ihownl up 'Tm told mal t an etetlirni lumoul." Bud uid “I m not hapmr with that I want about twice ihaL"' Moti inilrucirin uy Ihc prnaran hrrn iiKccttful ( onimcmt fio« amhaahorn Hudenit pjrrnit teachert and city ollioalt have been potilive. rieeihim uid “At a mallet of &cl. they atk for more of It," he Mid “We've had requrtit finm town-grade-letei Irai hcit lo come in and do the DARI ruriiculum." Howetet. the Mimtrapolii unit «{B wail for the reiutu of a tiudy by Edualional f ypetalion, Cmicepu Irw hrfoit etpandint the pro,,,„ The tiudy it being funded thmugh a $ 12 MJO grant fiom the Me Kjtigyu Foundation Rcaulls wtU to avaiiabte laJuly.heaaid Even with thoie mutu, the prngram'a teal aurma won't be realued imunily. Said Bird- "You can't demonurtte Ihrougb mtinica nghi away Well know when ihcae kiA« are juaion and Maiota.“ Soitw drpartmcait. houaver. have aren tome immediaie bencrut. la New Hope, aitendarce hai incrcaaed, achool vandalitm hat drere ated and ttudeai conduct baa unproved. Bird laid. On May 20. ofTiccn ail mecl to diaroMfanntag the Miaacaou -< DARE OfTiccn AtaocMUoa at ShcraioaParhPlMeMMH «»« . Wayata Blvd., Miae..apDHa The aatociatioa ariD a.rve h t vehicle to rtchangt Meat and pcoMemt. Tha LegitUtatc alw h conaderi ng funding foe a DARE regioaal mhiiag ceairr in the Twin Quea. o I REMODELING CLEAN UP SALE! t Wc are putting tha flnlahlng touches on oui newly remodeled '{^^ishowrpoms and have many odds and ends that must be r. esned out . at SAVINGS OF 40X-50X-60X AND MOKEI ----------------- aiviiocow^^-^^^SOFAS^ALO^^^^^^^^ SSSJsasaniM SF.CTIONALS Heap atgfoa S catora Reg '800 lo *2000 SALE PRICED •299 TO *899 SALE PRICED •499 TO »1399 J V At AV'IVII l.<l! Ck)mpariiig New Homes? When you compare a Sunthinc home to any other new home available, you will he amated at all the lururwus fcatiirci that come uandard Amcnitica hke our oak wood work, polithcd bravi, whirlpool tyaihi and tile noon make • Sunthinc home tiand wotidt apin from all other new hornet Compile quality O-mpiic price. You'll find dulUr for dollar, Sunthinc pvei you more home for your money No wonder people have told us there are only 2 home huildcrt in ihoTwtn Cilict. SunthiiK, and all the rett I'isif eiir moiifU of diuinttitt fmmity hornet now ofvn in new neigbborboodt! c:llA.Ml.ASSfN 5-8-89 Charlotte Hill 4177 Shoreline Drive, #7 Spring Park, MN 55384 Chief Melvin Kilbo and Staff Orono Police Department 445 N. Willow Dr. Long Lake, MN 55356 o Dear Chief Kilbo, Sue, Carol and Officers, My heart is full of the deepest gratitude to yovi for the immediacy and competency of your response to my 911 phone call on April 14 of this year. I sustained a medication reaction that left me in a coma for 2 days and in the hospital for 2 1/2 weeks. I remember hearing the sirens and knew that if I had any chance to live, help was coming and coming fast. I found out later that 5 minutes delay would almost assuredly have meant my death. When X arrived home, I found your lovely get-well card and that was one of the kindest gifts that I have ever received. Now, I am getting stronger every day and expect a full recovery. But my thoughts remain full of the thankfulness that I feel to all of you. My very best wishes go to each of you. Sincerely, ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT MESS KEY CONTROL NUMBER (OCAf CONT AGENCY NCC IDE NT (CAGi I E , C , 1 I / I y. ‘■A /0/1, /, / I M , N I 0 , ; , 7 1-^,/ / L|i®P DATE REPORTED tRPOl T!MERPO(TRPt LOCATION GRIND N0R (LGN) [j] / JP771 / I/,/1 /^l / dUZS// ALARM MEDICAL PLACE COMMITTTO (PIQ □ /2>/\ LNBR HRO [Il/EI/C SOUAO OR BADGE «(SBN)TfViE ASIG (TASI TIME ARR (TAR)TIME cm rrai . /I/I /i/i / ,aJ /!/ , / I / /, / LNBR UOC UCSnri / r?!r7 /1 , <9,7./ ra LN6R ISN______________yOC _________ UCS VD/C /L OfFCER PRINCIPAL CODE SUSPECT SUS vKrriM VIC ^«ST ^REPORT PART/RP AOMIN ADM OFFENOER OFF OTHER OTH OFFENSED ORMTIALCOMPIAWTG /}7 HRDCodK P-PHone R-R«»o A-AMm l-hPtnon V-V«Ml M-Max T-Olh« O -o 00 ARRESTD OTATlONa WARNG ADDRESS NAMEO^^I OTY NAME (LAST FIRST MBOOlE] SEX PH(W) ADDRESS ADDRESS NAME (LAST. FMST. MIOfXjE) ___ OTHER REPORTS WCLUOED ImpoundG Prop Invenlofy G X lmciAedConi*f«G Aeodw Rtport Q ___ Mutne* Riport □ P»«os 0 Taps □ CoTinv V*h RpportC Ovw»*g«D PHlW) PH(fl) ooe RolCtfG PW|W) PHIR) CAUSE OF ALARM TYPE OF ALARM USER ERROR □INTRUSION □ UM(NOWN □HOLDUP □ OPEN OOORWNDOW □EMERGENCY □ MECH.AMC.U MALFUNCTION □FK □ nruru OTHER ccAorMrv wnrMMRT it ARM m WEATHER CONOmONS normal MOCTKAit SEVERE (HEAVY RAMS ETC) (.S' VS□ □ □ WATT FOR KEYHOLOERT KEYMOLOER NAA«;___ MEDICAL RESCUE FWE DEPT AMBULANCE:TREATED RELEASED A I# . : / 'X^^'>4^^"'-^/..^ .c:-^rc /<^:f i^->w V -j ^ ^ * ~ *A^W?^ k...': • •: . a7^ ‘V ^ ’ - y/o --yL^LC-^^XZ K Officer Frienclly Program O OFFICER FRIENDLY BACKGROUND 5/1/89 For your background Information, we thought it would be helpful for you to know that. The Sears-Roebuck Foundation originated the Officer Friendly Program and has for more than twenty-three years been involved with its development. Participating communities have been provided our copyrighted materials at no charge. Student activity booklets and Officer Teacher Guides for k'ndergarten through third grade have been furnished in the past. These Guides are now out-of-print. A revised program is under consideration. In 1988 The Sears-Roeytuck Foundation invested more than $400,000 to support the Officer Friendly program. Mou than 450 communities across the nation received over $250,000 in materials for the 1988-89 school year. The largest program covers the state of Utah where more than 69 law enforcement agencies, 64*> schools, and 148,000 students in grades K thru 3 are involved. The smallest is a town in North Dakota with a very few students in one school. About l.O million elementary students and more than 60,000 educators are participating in the 1988-89 school year. Local Officer Friendly programs are conducted jointly by a community's law enforcement agency and its schools. Usually the Chief of Polic»j or Sheriff are involved but often an Officer is delegated responsitility to conduct the program. The Superintendent of Schools is u \lly involved, bat here too, the responsibility is often delegated to another educ. or who works with the law enforcement agency. The local principals and teachers generally enthusiastically participate ^n the program. Often their is a volunteer element associated with the local Officer Friendly program, such as the PTA. Parents, teachers and law enforcement personnel are oftan involved actively in the development of activities at the local level. The program is designed so that a uniformed officer can visit each classroom three times during the school year. To • ^ {So*-' IVlftiK. "Officer Friertdiy " is a regi«iered trademark of The Sears -Ro% cooperating public, prr/ate. parochial schools and their respects cooperation with The Sears Richard K. Hartung Program Manager The Sears-Roebuck Foundation Department 903 - BSC 51-03 Sears Tower Chicago,- IL 60684 s Officer Friendly programs are sponsored Oy u sherill departments throughout the nation, in nda'ion