The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04-10-1989 Council PacketCITY OF ORONO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, APRIL 10, 1989, 7:00 P.M. Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL 1. PUBLIC HBARIHG 7:00 P.M. - Year XV C.D.B.G. 2. CONSENT AGENDA* APPROVAL OF MINUTES^ * 3. Regular Meeting of March 27, 1989 PUBLIC COMMENTS > (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT ♦♦APPLICANTS** Immediately after the Council has reviewed your application please sign the three (3) original resolution copies. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. #1374 Freshwater Foundation, 2500 Shadywood Road - Subdivision-tW^^'^' #1376 Dale/Chris Palm, 1710 Shadywood Road - Variance #1383 Lillian Bonander, 3200 North Shore Drive - Variance - Resolution #1385 Big Island Board of Governors - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution #1386 Clifford Otten, Outlot A, Ringerswood - Rezoning #1387 Margaret Rossing, 130 Cygnet Place - Variance - Resolution #1353 John Fiebelkorn, 2730 Shadywood Road - After the Fact Variance Planned Development Ordinance 10. 11. ENGINEER'S REPORT MAYOR'S REPORT 12. Planning Commission Interviews/Appointraent 13. Planning Commission/Council Joint Meeting 14. Lake Minnetonka Management Plan - Subcommittee Solication Restoration CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 15. County Road 51 Parking County Road 116 County Road 15 Boulevard Fullerton/Center Island Police Department - Annual Report Police Equipment Acquisition - Module Console Hennepin Parks - Eminent Domain Hearing 21A. Highway Safety Improvement 22. Salary Adjustment Officer Larry Tomcheck 23. Required Agenda - Ordinance Amendraent"“7>/Bde0 24. Temporary Seasonal Employees - Golf Course 25. C.D.B.G. Resolution <54/^ 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, APRIL 10, 1989, 7:00 P.M. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Continued * 26. Removal of Water Fowl * 28. * 29. * 30. Spring Clean Up Day Temporary Part Time Employment - Officer Friendly Administrator's Information Highway 12 Task Force DARE/Officer Friendly Site Selection County Road 15 Ribbon Cutting - May 6, 1989 Board of Review Spring Manager's Conference Navarre Redevelopment Summary of Receipts 'Disbursements - January/February Electronic Funds Transfers - Jan-Feb-March Grievance Policy Goal Setting Statu^ CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT LICENSES (31*) BILLS (32*) ADJOURNMENT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING year r; (1989) urban HEJINEPIN count/ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM OronoNotice is hereby given that the city of __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _^_ _ _ _ _ _ cooperation with Hennepin County, pursuant to Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, is holding a public hearing on _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, April 10_ _ _ _ _ _ _, 1989 at 7:00 p.m. in the Orono Council Chambers - 1275 Brown Road South_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _• The public hearing is on the housing and community development needs of the city and Urban Hennepin County, the Urban Hennepin county Community Develop ment Block Grant Program Statement of Objectives, and the proposed use of the Year XV Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program Planning Allocation of $ 23,976_ _ _ _ _ _by the city. The Statement of Objectives consists of seven program areas, basically: (1) Ac ministration, to maximize program benefit and effectively administer program funds; (2) Housing, to rehabilitate and assist in the development of housing which is affordable to low- and moderate-Income households; (3) Neighborhood Revitalization, to maintain and preserve viable neighborhoods through concen trated community development activities; (4) Public Facilities, to improve existing and assist in the development of new public facilities which benefit low- and moderate-income persons; (5) Economic Development, to provide financial assistance to businesses which will provide or retain employment to the benefit of low- and moderate-income persons; (6) Public Services, to expand and improve the quantity and quality of public ser-/ices available to low- and moderate-income persons; and (7) Removal of Architectural Barriers, to remove material and architectural barriers which restrict the mobility and accessibility of elderly or handicapped persons. The city of Orono is proposing to undertake the following activities with Year XV Urban Hennepin County CDBG funds starting about July 1, 1989: Activity Budget Rehabilitation of Private Prop. 8,500 Hwy 12 Corridor Study $ 14,476 $ 1,000Westonka Intervention For additional information on the proposed activities, level of funding, program objectives and performance, contact the city of Orono or the Hennepin County Office of Planning and Development at 348-6418. The public hearing is being held pursuant of hS 471.59. NOTICE Of PUB C HEAflING YEAR XV (19»5)'»IOAi HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEN PROGRAM lENf BCOCK GRANT Ithal the city of Orono pm County, pursuant •Kl Commi'Oity Oe- I amonded. is t•oiding 0. 1989 at 7 00 p m 1275 Brown Notice is hereb&ive m cooperation witf to Title I of the I vetopment Act of a pobHc hearing oii----- on the Orono Council Ohambers Road SouthThe publK: heaftoQ la on the houamg and com munity development needs of the city and Ur- turn Hennepip County, the Urban Hennepm County Community Oevetopment BtocS Grant Program Statement of Objectives, and the pro posed use of the Year XV Urban Hennepin County Community Oevetopment Block Grant Program Planning Allocation of $23,976 by the city The Statement of Objactivea consists o( seven program areas, basicady: (1) Administra tion. to rnaslmm program benefit and effectively administer program funds; (2) Housing, to re habMitate and assist m the development of houa- ing which Is affordable to low- and moderrte-mcome hooseholda. (3) Neighborhood RevitaliMtion. to maintain and preserve vlabie nelghhorhoods through concentrated communi ty developmeni acfivitlea. |4) Public Facilities, to impfove existing and assist m the develop ment of new public facilities which benefit low- and moderate-income persons. (5) Economic Development, to provide financial assistance to businesses which will provide or retain employ ment to the benefit of low- and moderrte^noome persons. (6) Public Services to expand and im prove tlie quantity and quality of pubic services avadabie to low- and moderate-income persons; and (7) Removal of Arcnitectural Barriers, to re move material and arcWtectural barriers which restrict the mobility and accsssibilify of eWerty or handicapped persons The city of Orono is pro.iosiog to undertake the fodowing activities with Year XV Urbe«- Hen nepin County COBG funds ttartmg about July 1..1989 Activity Rehabilitation of Private Prop Hwy 12 Corridor Study Westonka Intervention 8.500 14.476 1.000 For additionai information on the proposed ac tivities. level of funding, program objectives and performance, contact the city of Orono or the Hennepin County Office of Planning and De- veloprnent at 348-6418 The pubkc hearing Is being held pursuant of MS 471 59 ubUshed In Tne Laker and Pioneer March 27 >nd April 3. 19891 Affidavit of Publication State of Minnesota. County of Hennepin. Bill Holm, being duly sworn, on oath says that he is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER. Mound. Min nesota. and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: A.) The newspaper has complied with a!! me require ments constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02. 331A.07. and other applicable laws, as amended. B.) The printed. f M/'i ie which Is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week for _______"7^_______successive weeks: It was first published Monday. Zl dav ot Mfiu/rthe .ff. and was thereafter printed and published every Monday, to and Including Monday. the ^ day of I 19^ marietta a. ST.1AU3 notary ru . ^ • :ota Authorized Agent :^y carv:.ac.j::ty ^ My Comm:c;icn 2. rca -Ixi. 27.1090 Subscribed and sworn to me on this V day nf _______ 19 By: 'y/l Notary Public Rate Information (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for compara ble space *9 80 per inch (2) Maximum rate allowed by law lor above mailer $Q 80 per inch (3) Rale aclually charged for above mailer $4 06 per ln*.h Each additional successive week $3 24 per Inch MINUTES OP THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 27, 1989 COUNCIL MEETWiS APR 101989 CITY OF ORONO ATTENDiVNCE 7:00 P.M. The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Acting Mayor Callahan, CounciImembers Nettles and Peterson; CounciImember Goetten and Mayor Grabek were absent. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Public Works Director Gerhardson, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron, City Attorney Barrett, City Engineer Cook and City Recorder Scheffler. CONSENT AGENDA* It was moved by CounciImember Nettles, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion, Ayes-3, Nays=0, Motion passed. PRESENTATION-DOROTHY HALLIN, CITY CLERK Acting Mayor Callahan read a letter that had been sent to Mayor Grabek from the International Institute of Municipal Clerks. A plaque was presented to Ms. Hallin and Acting Mayor Callahan commended her for her achievements and contributions to the City. OATH OF OFPICE-SCOTT KUYPER City Administrator Bernhardson administered the oath of office to Officer Kuyper. APPPROVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to approve the Minutes of the March 13, 19898 Regular Council Meeting. Motion, Ayes*3, Nays=0, Motion passed. APPrOVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to approve the Minutes of the March 8, 1989 Special Meeting. Motion, Ayes*3, Nays«0, Motion passed. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT: EURASIAN MILFOIL PROGRAM PROGRESS LMCD Representative, JoEllen Hurr, reported that to date a total of $453,526.00 had been collected to assist with the removal of Eurasian Milfoil from Lake Minnetonka. In addition to that, Mr. Irwin Jacobs and other Lake Area citizens have contributed $500,000.00. The LMCD will be taking bids for equipment on Wednesday, March 29, and ordering equipment shortly thereafter. Hennepin County is providing the LMCD with a project supervisor that will oversee the summer operations. The LMCD will contract for workers to use the machinery purchased. Every City, with the exception of Wayzata and Minnetonka, has contributed to the milfoil fund. MINUTES OP THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OP MARCH 21, 1989 LMCD REPORT CONTINUED Acting Mayor Callahan asked lat the expected effectiveness of harvesting the milfoil would be. Ms. Hurr answered that the DNR would only allow 50% of the weed to be cut. This was due to the fact that weeds beneficial to the Lakr would be harvested along with the milfoil weed. If the LMCD can purchase three harvesters, it is hoped that they can cut 500 acres twice per year. Money is being directed toward finding a biological solution to the milfoil problem. Acting Mayor Callahan questioned whether the City should release its contribution for the milfoil project at this time in light of adequate funds being collected to purchase the equipment. Bernhardson replied that it may be best to release Orono's contribution when either Wayzata or Minnetonka make a contribution and bring the Cities' fund total to $70,000. LMCD SHORBLAND REGULATION-DRAFT Ms. Hurr stated that the draft of the regulations will be released shortly and the Lake Cities will have 5 or 6 months to ’-espond. The shoreland regulations, once completed, will become a part of the LMCD's Comprehensive Plan. MISCEIJJVNEOUS There will be an upcoming dinner to recognize those persons that worked on the "Save the Lake" project and the water patrol. Ms. Hurr thanked the City for the letter of recommendation supporting her reappointment to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. The Orono sewer project is continuing along County Roads 51 and 19, Many business owners in Navarre have expressed concern about the project affecting their business. The LMCD has negoiated with the contractor and will allow the entire closing of County Road 51 from County Road 135 to the North Arm Landing. That portion should be completed in April and the portion of County Road 19 would be completed by Memorial Day. The Navarre business seemed satisfied with that schedule. The only factors left to be determined, are the school buses and mail delivery. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments from the Public. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: #1364 EDWIN GAGE 480 TONKAWA ROAD CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT RESOLUTION #2604* It was moved by CounciImember Nettles, seconded CounciImember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2604, granting a variance and conditional use permit to Edwin Gage, 480 Tonkawa Road, for construction of a 4' wide platform walkway in the 0-75* MINUTES OF THE OROMO COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 27, 1989 ZONING FILE 11364-GAGE CONTINUED lakeshore setback zone. Motion, Ayes=3, Nays*0, Motion passed. #1382 JOHN ROGERS 755 TONKAWA ROAD VARIANCES RESOLUTION #2605* It was moved by CounciImember Nettles, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to approve Resolution #2605, granting variances for additional structure in the 0-75* lakeshore setback zone for John and Lois Rogers, 755 Torkawa Road. Motion, Ayes=3, Nays=0, Motion passed. #1366 LOREN BUTTERFIELD 3925 WATERTOWN ROAD SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #2610 City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed the factors involved in this request for a subdivision. A portion of the five acre lot involved is across the Luce Line Trail. The property of Lot 2, north of the Luce Line contains the 2-acre minimum dry contiguous land required for building. The DNR has granted a public easement to cross the Luce Line, however, that easement does not connect in any way with Lot 2. The steep topography bordering this property limits the ability to access it. The southern portion of Lot 2 contains wetlands and the northern portion has a retention pond which Mr. Butterfield installed in 1953. The pond is used mainly for collecting runoff that results from Mr. Butterfield's nursery and is recycled back into the nursery operation and a reserve for fire. Mr. Butterfield hc.s used the wetlands as a source of peat for his nursery, although he does not sell it commercially. A drainage easement for the pond on Lot 2 is being recommended and would allow Mr. Butterfield to continue pumping from the pond. A conservation and flowage easement on Outlot A and B, for the utilization of wc'ter and peat is recommended and would be subject to the guidelines of a conditional use permit. A variance would be required due to the greenhouse structure being located 1* from the proposed lot line of Outlot C. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that the Planning Commission recommended that no accessory structures be allowed south of the Luce Line Trail. Mr. Butterfield would like an exception to the recommendation. A secondary issue would be the setbacks. The setbacks may vary depending upon what would classify as the rear lot line. If accessory b»:ilaings were allowed south of the Luce Line, appropriate setbacks Vvould need to be determined. The standard 26* from tha wetlands would apply. Mr. Butterfield oointed out the fact that prior to applying for the subdivision, he could put accessory structures south of the Luce Line. He did not understand how a subdivision application could take away rights that he previously possessed. He also commented that there are other lots south of the Luce minutes of the orono council meeting of march 21, 1989 ZONING FILE #1378-0STR0M CONTINUED passed. ENGINEER'S REPORT: LIVINGSTON AVENUE-FEASIBILITY STUDY COST RESOLUTION #2608 Mark and Karen Cuff were present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson reported that the feasibility study of the Cuff's property would cost $900.00. The City is recommending that the Cuff's would pay half of the $900.00 should the project not proceed. The City Attorney has determined that a petition of 35% of the affected property owners would not be required for the feasibility study. This would only apply to the project itself. Acting Mayor Callahan questioned the number of residences that would be affected by this project. Bernhardson stated that the number would vary depending upon whether the City considered only the affected property owners or the entire drainage district. He estimated that there would only be 5 or 6 residences directly affected. Karen Cuff showed the Council pictures she had taken of the water running through her property. She mentioned the fact that there had been severe Wc ter leakage into her basement and their driveway was breaking apart due to excessive water. She indicated their willingness to half the cost. It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by CounciImember Nettles, to adopt Resolution #2608, directing the City Engineer to prepare a feasibility study relating to storm sewer installation on Livingston Avenue. It is additionally approved to include the costs of rne feasibility study into the project costs if a project is ordered, and that ore half of the costs of the feasibility study be paid by the resident at 3572 Livingston Avenue if the project does not proceed. Motion, Ayes=3, Nays*0, Motion passed. LIFT STATIONS 10 AND 43 City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the replacement of these two lift stations would be done in conjunction with the Metro Waste Control Commission sewer project. If lift station #10 is replaced with a gravity line the cost would be approximately $195,000.00. Due to the lift station installed by the MWCC, lift station #43 can also be eliminated. It has been determined that on a long term basis, this proposal would be most feasible. The City is recommending that funding for the lift station #10 project come from future connection charges of approximately 80 sewer units in the area. Normally, if the City were to replace the lift stations, the City would have to totally fund the cost of the project. The funding for elimination of lift station #43 is recommended to come from the City's operating fund. MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 27, 1989 LIFT STATIONS 10 AND 43 CONTINUED It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by CounciImember Peterson, to accept the updated reports for lift station #10 and 43 by-pass and to direct staff to advertise for bids. Motion, Ayes*3, Nays=0, Motion passed. MAYOR'S REPORT: PLANNING COMMISSION INTERVIEWS* It was moved by CounciImember Nettles, seconded by CounciImember Peterson, to accept the information from the staff and table the interviews until the April 10, 1989 meeting. Motion, Ayes*3, Nays=*0, Motion passed. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: FACILITIES SITE ANALYSIS City Administrator Berniiardson asked the Council for their approval to authorize the expenditure of $2,100.00 for the purpose of performing soil tests on two potential sites. It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to authorize expenditure of $2,100.00 from the City's Building Fund to perform soil tests on two potential sites, and further direct the comments from Planning Commission be incorporated in the analysis by the architect. Motion, Ayes=3, Nays=C, Motion passed. ELDERLY HOUSING City Administrator Bernhardson stated that the County had approached the City regarding the possibility of constructing a 50-unit elderly housing facility in Na/arre. The project would be funded through tax exempt mortgage bonds through the County. It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to direct staff to further explore this option with the County regarding potential sites, needed services and initial feasibility. Motion, Ayes*3, Nays=*0, Motion passed. WATER CONSERVATION REGULATION It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to continue water conservation regulations as set forth in Resolution #2496. Motion, Ayes=3, Nays»0, Motion passed. PART TIME OFFICER KUYPER/PERA RESOLUTION #2609* It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2609, declaring the part-time position held by Scott E. Kuyper is that of a Police Officer. Motion, Ayes*3, Nays-®0, Motion passed. AUTHORIZATION TO HIRE - ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR* It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to authorize the hiring of Linda Walters MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 27, 1989 ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR CONTINUED to fill the position of Assistant Finance Director, effective April 3, 1989, at a starting salary of $10,005 per hour (Level 5 Step I) with a salary review for possible consideration of Level 5 Step II at the end of six months of employment. Ayes = 3, Nays=0, Motion passed. AUTHORIZATION FOR CAR AUCTION* It was moved by CounciImember Nettles, seconded by CounciImember Peterson, to approve ti.e auction of abandoned, seized or unclaimed vehicles, to be held May 6, 1989. Motion, Ayes--3, Nays=0, Motion passed. AUTHORIZATION FOR CITY AUCTION* It was moved by Coui.ci Imember Nettles, seconded by CounciImember Peterson, to approve the disposal of unclaimed, confiscated and obsolete property at auction to be held Saturday, April 29, 1989. Motion, Ayes=3, Nays=0, Motion passed. AFTER-THE-FACT - CHARGING POLICY* It was moved by CounciImembe r Nettles, seconded by CounciImember Peterson, to amend Ordinance Number 62 of the second series to incorporate the policy regarding double fee payment by residential property owners. Motion, Ayes=3, Nays=0, Motion passed. EQUIPMENT PURCHASE-PUBLIC WORKS SKID STEER LOADER* It was moved by Counci Imember Nettles, seconded by Counci Imember Peterson, to approve the purchase of one new skid steer loader from Lano Equipment Company for an amount of $9,658.00. Motion, Ayes=3, Nays=0, Motion passed. ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION* It was moved by CounciImember Nettles, seconded by Counci Imember Peterson, to accept the City Administrator's Information regarding; Highway 12 Signage; Highway 12 Task Force; Minnehaha Creek Watershed District/Clean Waters Grant; MCWD Response/Operations Policy; Lord Fletchers Parking; Minnetrista/Hennepin Parks; Crystal Bay Road-Property Owner Assessment; Crystal Bay Road-Restoration Work; Response to Concerned Resident; and County Road 116. Motion, Ayes=*3, Nays=0, Motion passed. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: There was no report from the City Attorney. LICENSES* It was moved by CounciImember Nettles, seccr-ed by CounciImember Peterson, to approve the following licen es; Septic System Installer;Patnode Bros. Sewer a Water 16551 Lake Ridge "^..ive Maple Grove, MN MINUTES OP THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 21, 1989 LICENSES CONTINUED Special Event: Easy Race IX One-half Marathon May 1, 1989 - 9:00 a.m. Motionr Ayes^l, Nays»0r Motion passed. - 11:00 a.m. BILLS* It was moved by CounciImember Nettles, seconded by CounciImember Peterson, to approve payment of the All Funds Accounts. Motion, Ayes»3, Nays»=0, Motion passed. EXECUTIVE SESSION - 8:05 P.M. City Attorney Barrett requested that the Council go into an executive session at 8:05 p.m. ADJOURNMENT 8:20 P.M. It was moved by CounciImember Peterson, seconded by CounciImember Nettles, to adjourn the Regular Council Meeting at 8:20 p.m. Motion, Ayes*3, Nays=0, Motion passed. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr. Acting Mayor MINUTES OP THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 21, 1989 ZONING PILE #1366-BUTTERPIELD CONTINUED Line that have accessory structures on them, and one in particular that has a house being constructed. Mr. Butterfield explained that he rarely encountered pedestrians on the Luce Line at any time of day, with the exception of Fall (leaves changing color) and Sundays. CounciImember Nettles questioned whether the crossing of Luce Line Trail occurred by pedestrians or vehicles? Mr. Buttterfield responded that he had crossed with tractors and trucks. Nettles then asked what type of accessory structure was being proposed south of the Luce Line. Mr. Butterfield said his son was proposing a gazebo-type structure. Mr. Butterfield indicated that the setbacks for that portion of Lo"-. 2 was not a concern, as long as an accessory structure would be allowed. CounciImember Peterson asked Mr. Butterfield what his objections to the proposed resolution were. Mr. Butterfield answered that he was concerned about the continued use of the pond and the ability to obtain peat. He said that he would be happy to comply with the recommendations made by the City Engineer. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron informed the Council that based upon their action, he had drafted specific language that would pertain to the Engineer's recomme dation. The language would require a drainage easement in Lot 1 with the allowance of drawing wat-jr from the pond on the northerly property and a conservation and flowage easement that would reference a conditional use permit for the wetlands on the southerly property. Mr. Butterfield would then be requir'^d to apply for a conditional use permit. Counci Imember P^^terson asked whether Mr. Butterfield was successful in obtaining the conditional use permit applied for in 1975. Bernhardson replied that he was directed to do that in 1975 and that staff was recommending that Mr. Butterfield come forth at this time with that application, since the previous approval had been for temporary use only. CounciImember Callahan stated that it was his opinion, the division and use of this property was unique. He was concerned about the extremely long and narrow outlot and felt that there would be a future request for a lot combination of the property south of the Luce Line. He believed that the recommendation of the Planning Commission ought to be followed. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that a "Special Lot Combination" would be filed in the chain of title that would require Lot 2 and Outlot A to remain together. However, it would not prevent a request for rezoning. Callahan did not believe that would be a permanent solution to a possible problem. Callahan reiterated his desire to follow the Planning Commission's recommendation to allow no accessory structures south of the Luce Line. MINUTES OP THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OP MARCH 27, 1989 ZONING PILE #1366-BUTTERPIELD CONTINUED Mr. Butterfield mentioned that he would be willing to provide an easement from Lot 2 to the Luce Line crossing and from the crossing to Outlot A. He cited a similar subdivision request that occurred in Apple Valley, wherein the Court ruled against Apple Valley for disallowing the request. It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan to accept the Planning Commission recommendations and that whatever need be done for the northerly pond, be done and that the applicant come back for the purposes of review of a conditional use permit for the southerly portion of Lot 2. There was no second to Councilmember Callahan's motion. It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to accept the Planning Commission recommendations with the exception that an access^^ry structure, in the form of a gazebo, be allowed on Outlot A with a minimum 50' setback from the Luce Line Trail and a 26' setback from the wetlands. Motion, Ayes=2, Callahan, Nay, Motion passed. #1384 PRITZ GULLICKSON 99 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH VACATION RESOLUTION #2607 Mr. Gullickson was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that a subdivision of this property had been done in 1986 but the existing drainage and utility easements were ot vacated. Those easements now interfere with the buildi g envelope of Mr. Gullickson's property. There were no questions or concerns expressed on behalf of the Council or the applicant. It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2607, granting a vacation of the drainage and utility easements that intersect the property at 99 Sixth Avenue North. Motion, Ayes*3, Nays»0, Motion passed. #1378 CURTIS OSTROM 4605 NATRRTONN ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2606 Mr. Ugurbil, the owner of 4605 Watertown Road, was present for this matter. There were no questions or concerns expressed on behalf of the Council or the applicant. It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to adopt Resolution #2606, granting a side yard setback variance of 14'15". Motion, Ayes*3, Nays=0, Motion Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson CCUNCIL MEETING From 2 Date: Subject: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning April 5, 1989 #1374 Freshwater Foundation, 2500 Shadywood Road ~ Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Final Approval Resolutio Zoning District - B-4/LR-1B Application - Lot line rearrangement/RLS to rectify approved subdivision which was never filed. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Proposed Resolution Exhibit B - Notice of Planning Commission Action of 3/30/89 Exhibic C - Planning Commission Minutes of 3/20/89 Exhibit D - Memo & Exhibits of 3/15/89 Discussion - Please review the memo and exhibits of March 15, 1989. Briefly, the Freshwater Foundation is requesting re-approval of a lot line rearrangement subdivision which was approved by the City Council on February 12, 1975 but was never filed with Hennepin County. Planning Commission, at their meeting of March 20, 1989, recommended on a vote of 4-0 to approve the Registered Land Survey as proposed, finding that all requirements for a subdivision have been met. Staff Recommendation - Staff recommends approval per the attached resolution of approval. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT VIA REGISTERED LAND SURVEY FOR THE FRESHWATER FOUNDATION FILE NO. 1374 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota? and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted sub division regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City? and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a Registered Land Survey subdivision of a lot line rearrangement by the Freshwater foundation (hereinafter "the subdivider") at 2500 Shadywood Road? and WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the B-4 and LR-lB zoning districts? and WHEREAS, Tract B of the proposed Registered Land Survey contains the existing Freshwater Biological Institute buildings and maintains the necessary acreage and lot line setbacks to accommodate those buildings. Tract A of the proposed Registered Land Survey consists mostly of designated wetland areas and is not intended as a buildable site, but is intended for legal combination with an adjacent wetland parcel to the north? and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the subdivision regulations of the City including: 1. Dedication on the Registered Land Survey of right-of-way for County Road 19. 2. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat documents in the amount of $75.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the Registered Land Survey for the Freshwater Foundation at 2500 Shadywood Road, subject to the following condition: 1. Tract A of the Registered Land Survey shall be legally combined for tax purposes with the adjacent E.W. Blanch parcel (P.I.D. #17-117- 23 44 0087). Page 1 of 2 2. The aforesaid Registered Land Survey shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office on or before October 10, 1989 together with a certified original copy of this Resolution. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the Registered Land Survey has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 10th day of April, 1989. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) 8S. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 19th day of April, 1989, by James R. Grabek & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public My Commission Expires Page 2 of 2 CITY OP ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 ZONING PILE NO. 1374 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 473-7357 Date of Notice: 3/30/89 TO: Freshwater Foundation COPIES TO: Arthur, Chapman & McDonough, P.A. 2500 Shadywood Road 81 So Ninth St P.O. Box 90 500 Young Quinlan Bldg Navarre, MN 55392-0090 Munneapolis, MN 55402-3214 Attn: Marty Jessen Attn: Jay Simons TYPE OP APPLICATION: Subdivision (R.L.S.) DATE OP MEETING: 3/20/89 VOTE: 4 For 0 Against Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval as submitted NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Your Registered Land Survey for lot line rearrangement will be presented to the City Council upon receipt of the following: 1. Provide 2 mylar originals of R.L.S. with surveyor's signature, to be signed by City Council and Clerk upon approval. 2. Provide one copy of R.L.S. at 1"=»200' scale. 3. a) Title opinion addressed to the City. b) The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. 4. Payment of $75.00 filing fee. Conditions of approval: Tract A shall be legally combined for tax purposes with E.W. Blanch parcel (P.I.D. #17-117-23 44 0087). All final submittals must be submitted to this office 10 days before the meeting at which Council will grant final subdivision approval. The Council meets on the 2nd and 4th Monday of the month. Regular meetings are rescheduled if they conflict with a national holiday. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of the above noted information. Deadline for the April 10th meeting is March 31, 1989 or April 14th for the April 24, 1989 meeting. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. MIHDTES OF THE PLANHING COMMISSIOH KITING HARCH 20, 1989 ZONING PILE il366-BOTTBRFIELD CONTINUED It was moved by Planning Commissioner Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Bellows, to reaffirm the recommendation that no accessory structures be allowed on OutLot A or B south of the Luce Line. This recommendation is based on the concern that the easement across the Luce Line is not between Outlot A and Lot 2. Motion, Ayes*3, Johnson, Nay, Motion passed. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron asked for clarification as to the setbacks from the Luce Line required for placing accessory structures on the north half of the property. Gaffron pointed out that if Mr. Butterfield's application involved a typical 2-acre subdivision, accessory structures would be allowed within 10' of the rear lot line and Luce Line right- of-way. Kelley replied that the Planning Commission would recommend the standard setbacks. The third area of concern was that of the setbacks for principal structure for the north side of the property. The Planning Commission had indicated a preference for a 100' setback. Mr. Butterfield indicated that he would have no problems with that setback. There were no further concerns on behalf of Mr. Butterfield. #1374 FRE.SHWATER FOUNDATION ^ 2500 SHADIWOOD ROAD SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 9:50 P.M. TO 9:55 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. Marty Jessen, President of the Freshwater Foundation, was present for this matter. Mr. Jessen explained that he was requesting a subdivision of the 7.4 acres upon which the Freshwater Foundation was located. The subdivision would leave 5.1 acres of dry buildable for the Institute and the remaining 2.3 acres, comprised mainly of wetlands, would become part of Tract A, Parcel 1. This subdivision had previously been approved by the City Council in 1973, but was never filed. The subdivision would allow the 5.1 acres with the buildings to be successfully transferred to the University of Minnesota. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Bellows, to recommend approval of the subdivision of a lot line rearrangement. Motion, Ayes=4, Nays*0, Motion passed. Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson U -o Froms Michael P, Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: March 15, 1989 Subject: '1374 Freshwater Foundation, 2500 Shadywood Road - oubdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Public Hearing Zoning District - B-4/LR-1B Application - Lot line rearrangement/RLS to rectify approved subdivision which waj never filed. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Application Legal Description Plat Map Property Owners List Staff Sketch on Plat Map Copy of Proposed Registered Land Survey 1983 Site Plan Showing Location of Existing Buildings Copy of Wetlands Airphoto Overlay 1973 Subdivision Approval Documentation Synopsis ~ In the early 1970s, the Freshwater Foundation obtained a lease from IDS Properties Inc. for a 5-acre parcel on which the Freshwater Biological Institute was ultimately constructed. The City Council required that the parcel be split off and become a separate tax parcel. This was approved at a regular meeting of the City Council on February 12, 1973, but apparently was never filed by the applicants. The purpose of this current application is to reapprove that subdivision so that it can be filed. Pertinent Facts - 1. The parcel to be split is approximately 7.4 acres. The dry buildable parcel including the FWBI buildings is approximately 5.1 acres in area. The remaining parcel is approximately 2.3 acres in area, and is 99% designated wetland. This wetland parcel is intended to be attached to the E.W. Blanch wetland parcel directly to the north along County Road 15. 2. The proposed dividing line leaves a rear setback for the existing buildings of approximately 51*, in excess of the 35* minimum rear setback for the B-4 zoning district. 3. This division will not create any new building sites. Zoning File #1374 March 15, 1989 Page 2 of 2 Discussion Mr. Blanch is a director of the Freshwater Foundation, and holds title to various foundation properties for financing and tax purposes. Since the wetland parcel to be split off and combined with Blanch's northerly parcel is not buildable, there are no concerns regarding u ilities or other encroachments. This lot line rearrangement merely reco. firms the City's previous approval of this division. Staff Recommendation - Staff recommends approval of the lot line rearrangement application as proposed. CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION n jx XSfU L PROPERTY LOCATION 2500 Shadwood Road and County Road 15 Site Address^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 20-11.7-23 11 0026 and 17-117-23 44 0087 Please chec- one - Property Attach legal description to application abstract or torrers? See Exhibit "A" attached hereto. APPLICANTS: Freshwater Fnundation. /J^^^l^one^^hom^ _c ^ Blanchr Jr. and Patricia K. Blanch, hUSBand'aiiu wxj.e Regents of the Oniv. of MN Phrmi* ^wn^V) 330-'»500Name ^/o .tokopipi ,t g;Tnions. .Tr,. Er;CT. Fnone ^wo-x;_^ —- - - - - Address; 81 South Ninth St., »500City; Minneapolis Zip 55402 OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (home) Phone (work) Addrass: (attach list if more than one) ___ City:.Zip:. EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present Use (check) Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units __ _ _ __ Other (specify) Institutional-Undevelopef Present Zoning District B-4 and LR Kb) PROPOSAL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Division for Tax Purposes yyy Lot Liue Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) _ _ _ _ _ __ Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: _^ Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Existing Units New Units Total Units Unitb per _ _ Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) Institutional- wet L»ands MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 2. 3. 4. 5. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Offxcial’s Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __Date 1. Payment of fees (parlc fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete, Zoning Official's Signature^_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) $150.00 250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) 300.00 + 20.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, Ci^y Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Wr - -- - - - - - - Date ^ ^7 / Owner's Signature _ _ _ Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. o.->y •V V ^ • isi_ • . It « ItExhibit "A" Legal Description 7,r /;J . S PARCEL 1 17-11*7‘^2 c>oS7 All that part of Government Lot 6, Section 17, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Southeasterly of the centerline of County Road No. 15, except that part thereof lying Westerly of the following described Line A and its Northeasterly extension: Line A. Commencing at the North Quarter corner of Section 20, Township 117, Range 23; thence on an assumed bearing of North 87 degrees 43 minutes 50 seconds East along the North line of said Section 20 a distance of 1760.44 feet; thence South 2 degrees 16 minutes 10 seconds East a distance of 33 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point "A”; thence North 87 degrees 43 minutes 50 seconds East a distance of 49.6 feet; thence Easterly along a tangential curve to t.he left, having a radius of 851.51 feet, a distance cf 265.4 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point ”B"; thence Westerly along said curve a distance of 245 feet; thence Southwesterly to a point which is on d liiie bearing South 38 degrees 52 minutes 10 seconds East and distant 65 feet Southeasterly from said Point "A"; thence South 38 degrees 52 minutes 10 seconds East a distance of 160.59 feet; thence Southeasterly along a tangential curve to the left, having a radius of 922.38 feet and a central angle of 5 degrees 14 minutes 36 seconds a distance of 84.41 feet to the actual point of beginning of Line A; thence North 20 degrees 52 minutes 16 seconds East along said Line A to said Point "B" and there terminating. PARCEL 2 M 001,10 All that part of Goveriunent Lot 1, Section 20, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Northeasterly of the Northeasterly line of Block 4, Townsite of Langdon Park and lying Northwesterly and Northeasterly of the following described Line B, except that part thereof lying Westerly of the following described Line A and its Southwesterly extension: Line A: Commencing at the North Quarter corner of Section 20, Township 117, Range 23; thence on an assumed beari* f North 87 degrees 43 minutes 50 seconds East along » North line of said Section 20 a distance of 1760.44 feet; thence South 2 degrees 16 minutes 10 seconds East a distance of 3 3 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point "A"; thence North 87 degrees 43 minutes 50 seconds Fast a distance of 49.6 feet; thence -1- if 3 Easterly along a tangential curve to the left, having a radius of 851.51 feet, a distance of 265.4 feet to a point hereinafter referred to cS Point "B”; thence Westerly along said curve a distance of 245 feet; thence Southwesterly to a point which is on a line bearing South 38 degrees 52 minutes 10 seconds East and distant 65 feet Southeasterly from said Point "A"; thence South 38 degrees 52 minutes 10 seconds East a distance of 160.59 feet; thence Southeasterly along a tangential curve to the left, having a radius of 922.38 feet and a central angle of 5 degrees 14 minutes 36 seconds a distance of 84.41 feet to the actual point of beginning of Line A; thence North 20 degrees 52 minutes 16 seconds East along said Line A to said Point "B" and there terminating; Line B; Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Government Lot 1; thence on an assumed bearing of South 1 degree 29 minutes 3 seconds East along the East line of said Government Lot 1 a distance of 486.60 feet to the actual point of beginning of the above mentioned Line B; thence North 69 degrees 25 minutes 7 seconds West a distance of 48.75 feet; thence South 39 degrees 42 minutes 50 seconds West to its intersection with the Northeasterly line of said Block 4, Townsite of Langdon Park and there terminating. -2- /' L«; A.T XV vT; /V OUTLOT €> #/i/ S* j'Ui? ‘V-X' 5 iVff:T» v:j. ^ -^.•;r-?>.;<V.V ■ .-hS."; > |. . ' r ^ I. • \ ._ '5.«j X ^ -^-^-ncoon (IK *r ^ . CITY OF OROWa-^l • - ; ./.'Jv i ^ ■ • '' '•/i ■ ■:: ''/I •: • •: c EXHiSiT : 7- -"’'vL .S.TEOf .*'• jt. C3°') 1 '■» ?■ ■f ■ -- ^Ort o< T. i.r IMl/OATE 02/14/89 BATCh 002------------- PROP ADOR (MCR NAIK TAXPAYER HAME/AOOR PROP ADOR CMIER tIAtlE TAXPAYER rUtK/AODR PROP AOOR OltICR IIAIC TAXPAYER NAHE/AODM 3 n '-117-2S 44 OOOS Oli-io SIIOREUNE DR STEVEN H MARTIN STEVEN H MARTIN 1295 LOHA LINDA AVE HOUND m 55S44 58 20-117-25 11 0002 02420 SIIAOYHOOO RO OOYAGEUR SERVICE CENTERS voyaceur service centers CO RO 15 A 17 tUVARRE Ttl 55592 58 20-117-25 V 0017 02455 SMAOYN^ RO ^ JARIBO IfC ' JARIBO INCORPONATEO 4545 ETICHAHTED PT SNOREHOOO TM 55544 / COUNTV PROPERTY INroRHATlON SYSTEM PROPERTY OMIERS LIST 58 17-117-25 44 0087 00058 ADDRESS UNASSiniED ERESUMATER BIOL RES E0W«0 ERESTWATE" BIO RES END SP‘'iYMOOD RO > 1-T 55591 i-t 'V T1/-2J 11 0007 / 025AJ KELLY AVE / KIRK K TSISON KIRK K NELSON 2560 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR *91 55551 58 20-117-25 11 0018 02455 SMAOYHOOO RO PAUL M Eir.LUIID ETAl PAUL M I JEAltff H ENGLUNO PO BOX 448 MOUND r«T 55564 REPORT HO. P1455401 PACE 2 58 17-117-25 44 0094 00058 ADDRESS lAUSSlGNEO LAEAYETTE ridge HOHEOniERS LAEAYETTE RIDGE MOItECIHTERS 1709 N FARM ROAO LONO LAKE TtT 55554 58 20-117-25 11 0015 02445 SMADYHOOD RD ISE NATL BAIK OF NAVARRE 1ST NATL BAIK OE NAVARRE CO ROAD 15 I CO ROAO 19 lUVARRE Ttl 55592 58 20-117-25 11 0021 02565 LYOIARO AVE C H ELLIOTT ETAL C M ELLIOTT BOX 128 NAVARRE Ml 55592 PROP ADOR OtllER NAME TAXPAYER MAIC/ADDR 58 20-117-25 11 0024 05555 SHORELINE DR MGT COMPANY SUPER VALU ATTN TAX DEPT 101 JEEEERSON AVE SO HOPKINS EM 55545 58 20-117-25 II 0024 02500 SMAOYHOOO RD THE REGENTS OE THE U OF M U OF mill REAL ESTATE OFFICE 555 MORRILL MALL 100 CHURCH ST 5E MPLS III S54SS 58 20-117-25 II 0027 02477 SHAOYMOOO RO R FREDERICK FREVERT ET Al MICHAEL HURLEY A MARY HURLEY 5100 GAiniE DR UNIT 90 MPLS Itl 55414 58 20-117-25 II 0028 PROP ADDR 02555 SHAOYMOOO RO OMIER NAME TllOlUS C I OEAlliA M LEACH TAXPAYER TimUS C LEACH NAME/AODR 8440 155RO COURT APPLE VALLEY Ttl 55124 58 20-117-25 n 0029 02545 SMAOYHOOO RCI THOMAS C A OEAIIU H LEACH TMOlUS C LEACH 8440 155RD COURE APPLE VALLEY EtI 55124 58 20-117-25 11 0050 02525 SHADYHOOO RO THOMAS C A DEAIIU H LEACH THOMAS C LEACH 8460 15SR0 CT APPLE VALLEY l«l 55124 58 20-117-25 11 0051 PROP AOOR 02465 SHAOYMOOO RO OltICR NAME 1ST MATl BK OE MAVARRE TAXPAYER 1ST TMTL BK OE lUVARRE NAHE/ADDR P 0 BOX 125 NAVARRE m 55592 1^ 58 20-112-25 11 0052 00058 ADDRESS UNASSICIIED 1ST NATL BAIK OE NAVARRE 1ST NATL BAIK OE NAVARRE P 0 BOX 125 NAVARRE »l 55592 58 21-117-25 22 0001 00058 ADDRESS UNASSICIIED ERESHHATER BIO RESEARCH EOUN FRESHHATER EOUNOATICN C/O E M BLANCH JR 5500 H BOTH ST BLOOMINGTON Itl 55451 RUN BATE 02/14/89 BATCH 002 5B 21-117-25 22 0014 PROP AOOR 0005S ADDRESS UNASSIGEIEO ONNER NAIIC ERESIWATCR BIOL RES FOUND TAXPAYER ERESHHATER E0U»»AT10H NAME/AOOR C/O E H BLANCH JR 5500 BOTH ST H BLOOmHBTON Itl 55451 HETtlEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INEORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OltKRS LIST 02 16-117-25 55 0025 0006' ADDRESS UNASSIGNFO ERE5I -UTER 010 RESEAR EOUNO ERESHHATER BIOLOGICAL INST PO BOX TOO NAVARRE Itl 55592 TOTAL BATCH REPORT NO. PI455401 PACE S 002 00020 PROP ADOR Ci«4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 17-117-23 4A 0085 033<^0 SHORELINE OR STEVEN H MARTIN STEVEN M MARTIN 1295 LOMA LINDA AVE HOUND HN 55364 HE^t^EPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 17-117-23 44 0087 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED FRESHWATER BIOL RES FOUND FRESHWATER BIO RES FNO 2500 SHAOYWOOO RD NAVARRE Mf^ 55391 REPORT rK). PI435401 PAGE 19 38 17-117-23 44 0091 03265 LAFAYETTE RIOGE CT CHEYENNE LAND CO STUART A A HILDA J GOLDBERG 3265 LAFAYETTE RIDGE COURT WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0092 PROP ADDR 03245 LAFAYETTE RIDGE CT OFMER NAME CHEYENNE LAND CO 'TAXPAYER DAVID F A SUSAN J BRIGGS NAME/ADDR 3245 LAFAYETTE RIDGE CT WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-25 44 0094 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOMEOWNERS LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOMEOWNERS 1709 N FARM ROAD LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 20-117-23 11 0002 02420 SHADYWOOD RO BOYAGEUR SERVICE CENTERS VOYAGEUR SERVICE CENTERS CO RD 15 A 17 NAVARRE HN 55392 38 20-117-23 11 0015 PROP ADDR 02445 SHADYWOOD RD OWNER NAME 1ST NATL BANK OF NAVARRE TAXPAYER 1ST NATL BANK OF NAVARRE NAME/ADDR CO ROAD 15 A CO ROAD 19 NAVARRE FM 55392 38 20-117-23 11 0026 02500 SHADYWOOD RD THE REGENTS OF THE U OF M U OF MIFM REAL ESTATE OFFICE 535 MORRILL HALL 100 CHURCH ST SE MPLS MN 55455 38 21-117-23 22 0014 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED FRESHWATER BIOL RES FOUt^D FRESHWATER FOUNDATION C/0 E W BLANCH JR 3500 BOTH ST W BLOOMINGTON MN 55431 82 16-117-23 33 0018 PROP ADDR 00082 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO 0»^ER NAME LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOMEOWNERS TAXPAYER LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOMEOWNERS NAME/ADDR 1709 N FARM ROAD LONG LAKE HN 55356 82 16-11/ 23 33 0019 00062 ADDRESS UfJASSIGNED LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOMEOhiiERS LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOMEOWNERS 1709 N FARM ROAD LONG LAKE MTJ 55356 82 16-117-23 33 0025 00082 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED FRESHWATER BIO RESEAR FOUND FRESHWATER BIOLOGICAL INST PO BOX 100 NAVARRE MT4 55392 PROP ADOR OMER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR TOTAL BATCH 009 00012 74 X 1*0 L') f-\ REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. HENNEMN COUNTY, MINNESOTA C. E. COULTER S ASSOCIATES, INC. LAND SURVEYORS I h*r»by c»rti*v In accordancs with th» provi«ton« o* Cli«pt*r 309, mnn««ota 9t«tut«« o< 1949, «• aM*nd»d, I hav# aurvayad tha (ol lowing gaaerlbad parcal o# land in tha County a* Mannapln, Stata rj» riinnaaota, to wit I All that part of Oovarn(«*ant Lot 1, Saction 20, lownahlp 117, Aanqa 27, Hannaoin County, Mlnnaaota lying Northaaatarly of tha NorthaaatarIy lli.a o* Bloch 4, Townaita ot Lanqdon Parh and lying Morthwaatar I y and Nor tt'aaatar I y o# tha following daacribad Lina B, axcapt that part tharaof lying Maatarly of tha following daacribad Lina A and Ita SouthwaatarIy a«tanaioni Coaaancing at tha North Ouartar cornar of Saction 20, Townahlp 117, Aanga 23i thanca on an aaauaad baaring of N 07« 43 ‘ 30- E along tha North ima o. aald Saction 20 a diatanca of 1760.44 faati thanca S 2 16' 10“ E a diatanca of 33 faat to a point harainaftar rafarrad to aa point “A~i thanca N 07 43 3<'" E a diatanca of 49.6 faati thanca Eaatarly along a tangan.^al curva to tha laft, having a radiua of 031.31 faat, a diatanca of 263.4 faat to a point haralnaftar rafarrad to aa point “B'l thanca Waatarly along aaid curva a diatanca of 243 faati thanra Swithwaatar I y to a point Hhich i a on a Ima baaring S 30* 52' 10" E and dtatant 63 faat Southaaatar1v trom aald point "At thanca S 38* 32* 10" E a diatanca of 160.39 faati thanca SouthaaatarIy along a tangantiai curva to tha laft, having a radiua of 922.30 fomi and a tanira: angla of 3* 14' 36" a diatanca of 04.41 faat to tha actnal o* ba.jM.mf.g of Lira A| thanca N 20* 32* 16“ E along aaid Lina A to aaid poir.l "B" ai>d thara tarwinatingi Lina Bi Cowwancing at tha Northaaat corn.. “Id Oovarnwant Lot It thanca on an aaauaad baaring of S 1* IS* 03“ i ■ .i tha Eaat llna of aaid Oovarnaat.t Lot 1 a diatanca of 406.60 faat to tha actual point of baginning o< tha abova aantionad Lina B| thanca N 69® IS* 07" N a diatanca of 40.75 »99ll . 3 39* 42* 30" W to Ita intaraactlon with tha NorthaaatarIy llna of aaid Bloci 4, Townaita of Langdon Park and thara tarainating. 1 haraby cartlfy that thi a ia a corract daimaatlon of aald ai.rvay. Oatad thla____________day of . ________________________ ______• John Coultar Pataraon, Land Sur vayor Nlnnaaota Licanaa No. 17792 ORONO, MINNESOTA ...... .Thla Ragiatarad Land Survay waa approvad and accaotad by tha City Council of tha City of Orono, Mlnnaaota, at a raguiar aaatlng tharaof hald thla day o< ___ _ _ ___ __ _ _« -•fh, City Council of tha City of Oro:io, Mlnnaaota .Mayor City Clar k PPOPCRTV TA* AND PUBLIC RECORDS OEPARTt«NT, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINMISOTA I haraby cartlfy that ta»aa payabla in ____________ and prior yaara hava baan paid for land daacribad on thia Ragiatarad Land Survay. Oatad thia.............. day of ________________________• *90___ . Dala 0. Polatad Han .aoin County Auditor Bvi ................................................... fOaput V SURVEY DIVISION. HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Purauant to Chaptar 010, Mlnnaaota Lawa of 1969. thla Ragiatarad Land Survay haa baan approvad thia __ _ _ _ . day of--- - --- - - - -. .• Barnard H. Laraon Hannapin County Survavor By: ------------ ----------- ------- - - REGISTRAR OP TITLES, HENNEPIN COUNTS, MINNESOTA I haraby cartlfy that tha within Ragiatarad Land Survay No. . waa filad for racord in thia offica thia_____ day o* . . . ♦ A.O. 1®0___rat _______ ______oclocl- ._.N. R. Dan Carlaon Ragiatrar o* Titlaa OapuiV / r© ^vC>• •\ "V XT -. W /. : • rv V. ■^o v**^: ,;■ D (V !®K;,-;, Nv, (, ■\.'V.V;, 1 c:^J C^-?o -V C::)~~m D I ' j n •• *. sV 1973MINUT2S OF A REGULAR M327ING KHLD PH3RUARY 12, uy Va.Mxi#T bpicorp "thd Council in to put Mr. WaganoT on the Council agenda for f^rst Beating in April. TIio Council also fait that Mr, Hickok should sa^le ^a runoff water in the spring and conside* rho down streaji flow effects of Mr, Wagoner s propcsal, Ma5san<^le Boved, Welsh seconded> to approve the granting of the division to tne FreSi*wawO. Biological Institute but with the understanding that tliis Botion has no effect on of any water connection cnarges against w.io property. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). Massengale novod, Welsh seconder’ .o approve the three utility perm" s of the Northwosto.n Bell Telephone Coapany. Motion, Ayes (3} • Hays (0), The Village Attorney gave a report on the interest that Northern States Power Company has in the Luce Lina Trail and their attempts to purchase the property. After the presentation, the Council referred the matter back to the Park CoBBission for them to consider the ipforaation given by the Attorney. The Village Council instructed the Village Administrator to put on the agenda lor tne Council aeeting of February 26, 1973, the Metro Sewer S.A.C. Ordinance and Blame Avenue, The Village Attorney will have the necessary docuaents prepared by that time. Massengale moved, Welsh seconded, to accept the Treasurer’s 1972 Financial Report anc instructed the Village Administrator tc post the report in three public places within the Village. ?Iotion, Ayes (3) - Nays i.0), Oberhauser moved, Welsh seconded, that Resolution #487, A Resolution Authorizing Lonr Lake-Orono Sewer Interceptor For Hackborry Area, be adopted. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). Pago 3 CCNDITICNAL US2 PIWIIV 1230 Woodhili Hoad . i»S Dr/ISION ?roshwatur Institute Dioloriul uTILiT/ ?5R:MITS Nortnwestern Bell Tolo. LUCm S.A.C. 0Ri)IN.Ai\C2 BLAINE AVENUE 1972 FINANCIAL REPORT RESOLUTION #487 Long Lake-Orono Sewer Hackberry 'M&‘:' TO: i. rv'*; ' fc # t* l» : ^‘ « ^ • DATB: SUBJBCT: Planning Coamission Meabers Mike Scheller January 4, 1973 Division Freshwater Biological lastitute • 2S00 Siadyifood^.^l^ Th« Prashwater Biological lastituto applied for a building off 5 acres froa the site.‘it_ _ ... i Since the concept has been approved on a *iir prSleiu. Splitting the assessments after the division wil* be a probSan.- eV-' ■. •-•--.i ..»»■■ im- i’- I- •i"': . • 'V- lii^ I • * * ■ • H A:M'FRD?BKnES.INC 8 . T O W E R .*;■ 1 > - '»' |f||OrBA>OUf. MIKN. M40* PHOMllCtU) *72.2500 ♦tX^-'rv • ,V.'l I- ' . >:^—cimv »omci ' ’,s OccMb«r r;^t. /- Orooo - H>*' •' ‘V:^* ^KlABMOCa 55323 JtoqaMt for porcol aub .division rV:*'^-:rK^ ^^;V*<iir« ownora of tht tax parcol Idonclflod as Plat .41321 f. ?iKol';i0o6 v.> . ground laaaa to tha Proah Watar Biological Instituco \‘ • • ••-!^* 1 ‘ ' 9/71 ^-^^^J^‘5.078:^dwra*'aa ahoim on tha ancloaad Survayor'a Cartificata; dated 6/19/7lV£^ ,;2^^^^ j^>l*Vtho''fillX haa^lafoxmad ua that thay hava racordad grcaad 'lmau* 12/27 "•J'v>, ■' . . . . . . . . .. . - ‘A '.\o- abova, va raapactfuily requaat that .tha Village ox ;:. >. vr.-'P)POoo‘approva and raquaat to tha County of Hannapln ttut tha parcel ha •T','.l la, that at your request---------------------------------------------------- ^ ^ ^ ;;'Xt :1a'farther our understanding that after tha County has done ao ani notifiad .. • Orooo that the value of tha property and tha assassoenta loviad a^inct ' V'*property eould than be subsaquantly divided, which action will then enable ^ ^ ‘equast the County will sake t^c ouraalvea'and tha VWIZ to secure froo tha County revised tax statosMtots r- ■ ^ . •. .V- Respectfully yours, IBS PROPBRXZSS, INC. .,• •■ - - -. .;..\v::-'i;- ' •-'•I;.; - “'vj ^ nh • *->■: i-‘ **?C - i Vice President ^ <eoela.•y’-‘ ttetar Slolofleal lD«tltut« ' 'y .■S-. ; 'JAM-2' ■■T- ' " ■ •. I • .‘v v-^V* Pil ii «^'efleioies^afsM«toi4heibiaf^ a-.-.a f' **'' mf.mm ua rjrr*^v. _________—-------- .. "iTc'CnTW CUiiCC CP ^C-C. 10 wf • >—• r— /^/-Mi**rP*R Si ASSOC1 A*T*p.S% 1C. E.COUi-Tb.K rnANKU.uCNZ. jn JOHN A. •’CTUMOON 4.ANO SUHVCYOnO 5^“ ^ k >^1 ............... vr-oTJc a C e"sO -NNCAAOUS, !.»a 0U _____ •.;]3300UVN0AUCAVE.S0.^^^^^^^ PCl^T ^ ‘ »1«*k ^urUci>or’tf ^Vl'f I__ S i V-^'2j ga »L i. * |f .■■•| ^■;V * ■)«Slk':v5^ ::,^:-----------------— -------------------^------------------------------ -------------------————■—^—MW r «w. <■* kM • C. E.COULTER & ASSOCIATES, ..NV-. JOHN A. riTCM&ON - r«Af<K •%, LCNZ, JH. LANC* suavcvons > l»CM%Tl‘l»CO U*»ori« UAkWfc or *TATC mikmcvota 1 X- MCoi»ri‘«co utaum or »tatc or mimmcvota IlCtMkl* •* • A» tn* •• •»»»»•• 3300 LYNOALC AVC. SO. MINNCAPOLlS. MINN. 95400.^^ ^ •, 024-0370 ^ • . • #AAtt rAMt AA-«A»^ 4 'mmp I fiiurtepor ’tf. (Ccr:;ficste 1^^ [V^jr»««l»w«ter nioae>9icAl Laboratory VilLogo of Orono. L,... Ka^Nnrro Project V- r «uit part of Covcmincnt Lot 1, Section 20. Tovrisbip 117. Range 23. Hennepin County. ' MlnmoMW deeribod as foUovTit Comcncin9 at tKo North Quartor corner o£ said ffV SoeCion 20, thinco NO^-lJ-SO'n along the North Uno of sard Sc^on ^0 a drstanc. ofi tr SCWC*On mw# xncnco i\o # •••■- . . . ^ ^ S;. 1760.44 foot; thence S2-1G'10-E a distance 33.00 feet to a ‘5:;:.to •• point A; thence N87»43*50C parallel with the North line of aaid Section 20 a dlotanco of 49.G0 feet; thence along a tangential circular curve to tlvs left having a I'fr‘c* radios of 851.51 feet for a distance of 265.40 foot; thcnco S20*52*16"W a distance of > .313.64 foot, laore or less, co a point in th* ;;orthcastcrly right of vay line of Count:'^ I•P''Hoad HO. 19. as now located and traveled, said point being 310.00 foot SouOwastcrly fe’.aforosaid Point A as sicasured along said Northeasterly right of way lino, saxd pointpoint A as sicasurca axon^ »«a« (,w.. -- - //•v .bolag the actual point of beginning of the parcel of land to bo described; thcncoI'iV Boiiw tna actual point or ocgxnning wt w.w -- - - - --— - ll^^ll20*5a*16"E along tha last described lino a distance of 215.00 feet; thence S73 37 41**E a dlatanco of 505.19 foot; thcnco S35*37*10"E a distance of 233.00 foot; thencer ^ M«9V04lW WA WW«ia 4^^ ^uww# %«a%»«4«»aa - —- — — ^ ^^9 bt^'*-S39*42*50"W a distance of 350,00 feet, more or loss, to a point in said Northoastorly right of way line of County Road No. 19; thcnco Northwesterly along said Northeasterly >1^' . . ^ r\f\ oir . to the actual xioint of., ri^t of way line a diatanca of 620.00 foot, •aora or lca« . to tho actual point of II:.Sub^aet to oasemonts and restrictions of record, if any. • . ■ ■ ■ ’• • . ‘ • . Sobjact to future widening, and improvemont of said County Road No. 19. . * • .' *■. •. j - 2 horoby oartlfy that this ourvoy, plan, or , ... . ‘report vao prepared by so or under ay * dlroot suporvlolon and that 1 an a duly u. * Seclatorod Land Surveyor undor tbo laws of ; • . •• •. • 1^® State of I'lnnoRota./) " ■ ■ "■ ■■ ' a.lt‘P: ;' * • • > ■?. '• • .• -• ■•••••.•■•■•.•. •.. . ••••'.■ ................................••• • ■ ■• : s *■ ■•••••. • ■VV ^ :?•; ^ • -c ^ ■: ^ :v . v • / * . »• ... .... , ,, • * . • * • s* *• • • •. '• • "SW-eT'.T. OP 'S -SHCgTS. •■•■•■•• •474 i..'-. . ... 4.4'« f n Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Date: Subject: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator April 5, 1989 COUNCIL MEETING #1376 Chris & Dale Palm, 1710 Shadywood Road - Variance CITY OF DOO’IjJfioning District - LR-IC, Single family, 1/2 acre, sewered Application - Request for amendment to previous hardcover approval, to allow retention of existing detached garage. This requires a hardcover variance as well as setback considerations. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Notice of Planning Commission Action of 3/27/89 Exhibit B - Planning Commission Minutes of 3/20/89 Exhibit C - Letter From Neighboring Property Owner Rhode of 3/17/89 Exhibit D - Memo & Exhibits of 3/15/89 Discussion ~ Please review the memo and exhibits of March 15, 1989. Briefly, the applicants are requesting further Council consideration to allow retention of the existing detached garage on the property. The applicants were originally allowed to expand their residence, and were granted hardcover variances in both the 0-75' and the 75-250' zones, conditioned on removal of the existing detached garage, which is located less than 2' from the side lot line and as close as 4.7' from the street lot line. The applicants original variance was granted in May of 1986. The applicants applied to have that variance amended to keep the garage and were turned down by the Council in April of 1988. Exhibit F of the March 15, 1989 memo indicates the steps staff has taken to have the detached garage removed. The applicants have again re-applied for a variance amendment, this time with a revised driveway configuration proposal. Planning Commission at their meeting of March 20, 1989 briefly reviewed the history of requests for this variance, and found no hardship to justify the necessary side and street setback variance and hardcover variance to allow the detached garage to remain. The applicants were not present at this meeting although the applicants had been notified well in advance of the meeting, and had been rescheduled at least once at applicants* request due to applicants' scheduling conflicts. Mrs. Palm suggests that she feels that she has rat been given her chance to explain her request to the Planning Commission, and may request that the Council refer the item back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration. Zoning File #1376 April 5, 1989 Page 2 of 2 Staff Recoonnendation - Staff would note for the record that, although we have worked with the applicant to give her direction as to what might be a safe and functional driveway access situation, staff has not encouraged her to make this application, and has stated that staff cannot support the request with a recommendation for approval. Council's options for action on this matter are as follows: 1. Approve, making specific findings of hardship, and direct staff to draft an approval resolution. 2. Deny, finding no hardship to justify the requested variances, direct staff to draft a denial resolution. 3. Refer the matter back to the Planning Commission for further consideration with the applicants present. If this action is taken, the item would be scheduled for the April 17th Planning Commission meeting, then returned to Council on April 24th. 4. Other. CITY OP ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 ZONING PILK NO. 1376 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 473-7357 Date of Notice: 3/27/89 TO: Chris & Dale Palm 1710 Shadywood Road Wayzata, Mn 55391 COPIES TO: TYPE OP APPLICATION: Variance DATE OP MEETING: 3/20/89 VOTE: 4 For 0 Against Plamning Commission recommends the following: Denial for reasons noted below NOTES AND Si^.CjiAL CONDITIONS: NOTE; Planning Commission was presented a letter from neighboring property owner, which arrived too late to be enclosed in packet, copy attached for your review. Neither applicant nor members of the public were present for the public hearing. Planning Commission expressed that they felt the facts of the application were sufficient that a recommendation could be voted on. Vote for denial as noted above was based on the following reasons: 1. No reasonable hardship shown. 2. No justification for variance given history of prior applications. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council Monday, April 10, 1989; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 20, 1989 #1376 DALE & CHRIS PALM 1710 SHADTWOOD ROAD VARIANCE CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 10:20 P.M. TO 10:21 P.M. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Planning Commissioner Brown, to recommend denial of the hardcover and setback variances requested by the applicants. Motion, Ayes*4, Nays=0, Motion passed. #1383 LILLIAN BONANDER 3200 NORTH SHORE DRIVE PUBLIC HEARING 9:57 P.M. TO 9:58 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mrs. Bonander explained that she wished to replace her deck and would require an average setback variance and hardcover variance to do so. Ms. Patricia Gonion, 3186 North Shor? L>. existing deck is deteriorating and is quite an in favor of Mrs. Bonander's plan to replace the existing deck. stated that the eyesore. She was Tnere were no further comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Johnson, secondc; Chairman Kelley, to recommend approval of the decrees xn hardcover to 35.16% in the 75-250* setback area and the ave ge lakeshore setback variance. The hardship with this application is the long driveway and the improvement of existing conditions. Motion, Ayes»4, Nays=0, Motion passed. #1385 BIG ISLAND BOARD OF GOVERNORS BIG ISLAND VET'S CAMP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 9:59 P.M. TO 10:00 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly loted. \ Mr. Alan Wisdorf, a representative for the Big Island Board of Governors was present. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that the Planning Commission would be reviewing a request for a conditional use permit for 30 overnight camping sites. Fifteen acres has been set aside for this purpose. The niaintenance crew will be responsible for maintaining low weeds and underbrush within 100* radius of the entire camp site. The City does not have any Information regarding the existing septic facilities and will be conducting regular inspections this summer to evaluate them. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. 3155 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55458 March 17, 1989 Orono Planning Commission Members Orouo Council Members Orono City Staff Members CTil OF ORONO P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Ladies and Gentlemen: I really don't like to write a letter like this, but given the Palm's request that they now be allowed to retain the old detached garage, I feel T simply have to write and express my views to you. As most of you no doubt know already, I'm the owner of the property at 1690 Shadywood Road, immediately to the north of the Palms, and therefore am the property owner most affected by whatever they do. When their remodeling requesc first came before the city many years ago, I went into the city offices and looked at the plans of what they were proposing. I had absolutely no objection to those plans. In fact, I thought it would be a significant improvement both to their property and to the entire neighborhood The plan to build an attached garage and tear down the old detached garage by the road was particularly appealing. Had I been in their shoes, I thought, I would do the same thing. So I never appeared before any of the Planning Commission or Council meetings on their request because I had no objections to it. But now, after the fact, when they come back to you requesting that they be allowed to retain the old detached garage, that puts things in a whole different light. Personally, I'm very much oppv.--ed to them retaining that garage and I would strongly encourage you reject their request. You already have been more than generoi i with them in the hardcover allowances wuich you allowed them, both in the 0-75 foot zone and in the 75-250 foot zone. They should be happy as a pig in mud with what they already have. For them to eve. allege that old garage is an "historic structure" is pure poppycock! An old, run down, poorly maintained building what it really is. If it were that "historic structure", I th.ink they'd want to take better care of it than they have. If you'll drive by and look at it, you'll see that they've got more junk p 1against it than the city dump.. And that's the way it's been : ;r as long as they've been engaged in their remodeling project. .. t'r* a fi.4.st class eye sore! over CITY OF ORONO page 2 March 17, 1989 I went into the city offices the other day and looked at their newest piuposal. One glance at it will quickly suggest all sorts of unacceptable possibilities later, not the least of which would be a request ro build a driveway up to the attached garage at some point in the future. It's sort of like an accident waiting to happen, because you know it will. They had every opportunity to consider their options before they ever started their remodeling project. If they didn't do a thorough enough job of that back then, they have no one to blame but themselves. But now to come back and ask for still more after all you've already given them is not really playing within the rules. Again, I encourage you to reject their request. Finally, on the matter of safety, all of those detached garages out by the road all along that stretch of Shadywood Road pose somewhat of a visual safety hazard. Take it from one who lived with it for the 16+ years I lived there. With all of those garages so close to the road, it's a real son-of-a-gun to get good sight lines as you attempt to enter the road from any driveway along that stretch, but particularly where we are because of the way the road curves in that area. And given the speeds at which cars zip along there (speed limit notwithstanding^, the better sight lines provided by the removal of the detached garages out by the road would be, at least as I see it, very beneficial, safetywise. Sincerely, Jack F. Rhode To: Planning Conunission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: March 15, 1989 Subject: #1376 Chris & Dale Palm, 1710 Shadywood Road - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-lC, Single family, 1/2 acre, sewered Application - Request for amendment to previous hardcover approval, to allow retention of existing detached garage. This requires a hardcover variance as well as setback considerations. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibi I - Exhibi. T - Exhibit : - Exhibit L - Exhibit M - Introduction - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Renotification Staff Letter to Applicant 11/4/88 Synopsis of Activity Letter from Applicant 12/7/88 Pre-1986 Hardcover/Site Plan Plan Approved by Council in March 1986 Site Plan - Currently Existing Current Proposal (2. Applicants* Hardcover Calculations Regarding Garage & Driveway with Staff Notations Memo & Exhibits of 11/22/88 Mr. & Mrs. Palm originally were granted variances to construct an attached garage and addition to their existing residence. That variance approval allowed them 17.5% hardcover in the 0-75* zone, and 29% in the 75- 250* zone. Applicants were required as a condition of that approval to remove the existing detached garage and minimize the driveway in order to meet the hardcover percentages allowed. The additions were constructed, however, the detached garage was never removed. Applicants appeared before Planning Commission and Council in February 1988 requesting relief from the condition to remove the garage. The Council denied that request and required that the garage be removed. The garage was not removed. The applicants have asked for and received a number of extensions on the removal for various reasons. The garage has never been removed, and the Palms were told by staff that the citation previously issued would be acted upon unless a new variance request was submitted. That request is before you now. p,C . Zoning File #1376 March 15, 1989 Page 2 of 3 Pertinent Pacts - 1. Applicants propose to remove the driveway from in front of the attached garage, and use that garage merely for storage. They would then retain the existing detached garage and reconstruct the apron and backup area to minimize hardcover (Plan 1). 2. As an alternate plan, applicants would leave a narrow driveway leading to the attached garage, passing directly in front of the detached garage (Plan 2). 3. Hardcover proposal (75-250'): Plan 1 Plan 2 Pre-Existing 2800 sf(27.3%) 2800 sf(27.3%) Current 4558 sf(44.4%) 4558 sf(44.4%) Allowed Proposed Final 2980 sf(29%) 3305 sf(32.2%) 2980 sf(29%) 3354 sf(32.7%) Staff Recommendation - Planning Commission must make a determination for approval or denial of the requested variance amendment, taking into account the following factors: 1. Applicants actual storage needs. 2. Is the proposed apron and backup area of Plan 1 sufficient for permanent access to this property? Does Plan 2 provide an adequate driveway area? 3. Is the proposed hardcover increase reasonable, given the extent of previous variances granted for this property? 4. Given that there is now an attached garage which meets the required setbacks, is it reasonable to allow the existing garage with its substandard setbacks, to remain? 5. Under Plan 1, how will the City prevent the attached garage from being used as a garage, and will there be a tendency by this owner or a future owner to use it as a garage, ultimately creating driveway hardcover? 6. If this request is approved, how wi' I the City react if, when the property to the north is redeveloped, a similar request comes in from that property owner to keep that garage which was to be removed, i.e. does allowing the Palm garage to remain set a precedent that weakens the City's position in placing conditions on variances? 7. Does applicants' claim that they were lead astray by their builder have any bearing on this request? Zoning File #1376 March 15, 1989 Page 3 of 3 Staff has made it clear to the applicants that while the current proposals incorporate what appear to be safe and adequate accesses to the property, staff cannot recommend approval of either proposal, given the history of activity regarding this matter and the Council's previous clear direction. Receipt- CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION . Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional varianc Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 ' (no change from original application)/ ^ After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee)“^ PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address I'llO A cl^y /jQf'^^A f/h . p J i'i Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) _ _ _ Please check one - Property _ _ abstract or torrens? CITY OF OFO^O FIrFSCE OFFICE 13C0200000 01 0E';i 150.00 CHECH TL 150.00 FECEIPJ-mHK YOU Attach legal description to application if not included on TiJ*' required survey. APPLICANT N£une Phone (home) Phone (work) Address: /7/0 ^Ad Jc ^i O Zip; OWNER (if different than applicant) Nime _ _ _ _ _ _ij- Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City;Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESj?a«T USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property _ _ _ _ _Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $_ Describe request in detail:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ VARIANCES REQUIRED _ _ _ Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width Front _ _ Hardcover Sida Rear) HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty result!^ r^m atrlcl enforcement of zoning regulations; ''71/^ 7^) Cx7^c: from strict ^■£rn'. DESCRIPTION OP DNDSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements;Ic. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS !• Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other »^ersons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this xecjuts^. Owner's Signature Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. -+40r»t- ----SHORg ^y) -r /- (!5) y) I (}<:> 2 MAPLEGATl: ',.-0 ' I ^/. ir.ot ■V INLE ^ (?<«) IM.22 lev*: 5(1?) i I%“ sfl I ; / - '■'" t‘ V ^>V>" HiAlJJ,-?, ’^x 1 15\? A 11 T 7)5 r <2,\T^Wo V (l>) 21 7221 ([^) ^ ' yM ^ li- Oo 26. (iD • - ?//^ \ ^ 27 i V—1----V\ (joZo) f»sv - ^/ z', /'S^>iV '«•' f f ■^N..; 'd V"’ r. 29 ()1) tV\__^ )'\ »*N iSi 3'<”^ RIM DATE 01/17/66 BATCH 008 IIEHHEPIN CCXJHTY PROPERTY IMFORHATIOfl SYSTEM PROPERTY OWIERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435A01 PAGE 21 PROP ADOR OUNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 38 17-117-23 21 0002 J A K STRAHPE ARTHUR A DOROTHY FINKELSTEIN 1740 SHAOYUOOO ROAD ORQHO HN 55391 38 17-117-23 21 0004 01675 SHAOYWOOO RO RICHARD 0 NORUM A NIFE RICHARD 1K)RUH 1675 SHAOYUOOO RQAO HAYZATA HN 55391 38 17-117-23 21 0005 01719 FAGERNES3 POINT RO Laureen Darlina 1719 Faaerness Point Rd Wayzata, 55391 38 17-117-23 21 0015 PROP AODR 01670 SHaOYUOOO RD ONNER NAME THOMAS R SARENPA ETAL TAXPAYER THOMAS R SARENPA NAME/AOOR 1670 SHAOYNOOO ROAD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 21 0016 01660 SHAOYUOOO RO JOHN G DOLEMAN ETAL JOHN 6 DOLEMAN 1660 SHAOYNOOO ROAD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 21 0017 01690 SHAOYUOOO RD JACK F RHODE JACK F RHODE 3155 NORTH SHORE DR HAYZATA IIN 55391 PROP AODR OUNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 36 17-117-23 21 0018 01710 SHAOYUOOO RD HARRY L MEYER ETAL DALE C PALM 1710 SHAOYUOOO RO HAYZATA MN 55391 PROP AODR 0I8IER NAME TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH HAIIE/AODR 008 00009 38 17-117-23 21 0019 01720 SHADYUOOD RO U A J KEENE UILLIAM H A JANICE M KEENE 1720 SHAOYUOOO RO ORONO MN 55391 38 17-117-23 21 0020 01740 SHAOYUOOO RD J A K STRAHPE ARTHUR A DOROTHY FINKELSTEIN 1740 SHAOYUOOO R0>0 ORONO lUl 55391 1376. I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEAR3 THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN C'"JNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY KNOULCDGE MU) BELIEF. y\ , • DATE TO: Neighboring Property Owners PROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE: February 13, 1989 SUBJECT: File #1376, Chris Palm, 1710 Shadywood Road - Rescheduling of Public Hearing The applicant is seeking hardcover variances to allow a detached garage, orginally required to be removed by the City in an earlier review, to remain on the property in exchange for the removal of existing hardcover improvements within the 75-250* setback area. The applicant has notified the City of a scheduling conflict and will not be present at the meeting of February 21, 1989. This memo is to notify you that the item will not be discussed on February 21st, and the public hearing will be held Monday, March 20, 1989, at the Orono Council Chambers, 1275 Brown Road South. The meeting starts at 7:00 P.M. CITV OF aRONO CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323• Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka November 4, 1988 Chris & Dale Palm 1710 Shadywood Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Re: Compliance with Conditions of Resolution #1936 & #2415 ^Dear Mr. & Mrs. Palm: On March 10, 1986, the Orono City Council granted a variance to • ou for the construction of an addition to your 'ome. As part of that variance application, you agreed to a hardr ;ver trade-off which required the removal of a detached garage on your property. You signed the resolution stating that you had read, understood and agreed to the conditions of the resolution. On April 25, 1988, the Council denied your request for a variance to keep the garage. Council gave a deadline date of June 1, 1988 for removal. On June 1, 1988, an Inspection was conducted and the garage was still in place. In a letter to you on June 2, 1988, the deadline was extended for 7 days. On June 9, 1988, the garage was found to be still in place and a citation was issued. On June 21, 1988, Mark Bernhardson, Orono City Administrator, extended the deadline again as per your request until November 1, 1988 based upon your committment to remove it by that date. A site inspection was conducted on November 2, 1988 and the garage was still found to be in place. Your failure to remove the garage leaves us no alternative but to issue you a citation. The tty understands that the moving or demolition of the garage will require some amount of planning. Therefore, we will withhold legal action until November 14, 1988, By the end of that time a moving or demolition permit must be issued and the garage must be removed before November 21, 1988. If these deadlines are not met, the City will issue citations for each day the garage remains a separate violation. This offense is punishable as a misdemeaner and carries a possible fine of $700.00 and 90 days in jail for each citation issued. BUILDING A ZONING - 473-7357 ASSESSING ADMINISTRATION A FINANCE - 473-7358 PUBLIC WORKS - 4 7 3-7359 Chris & Dale Palm 1710 Shadywood Road November A, 1988 Page 2 of 2 If you have any question, please feel free to contact Jeanne Mabusth, Mark Bernhardson or myself at the City offices (473- 7357). Sincerely, Lyle Oman, Field Inspector LO/tln cc; Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Thomas J. Jacoos, Senior Building Inspector Tom Barrett, city Attorney 1720 SHADYWOOD ROAD 5/10/ '6 Variance granted - Resolution #1936 5/22/86 Stop Order posted (no permit) 5/29/86 Resolution signed by Da.1e Palm 6/4/86 Permit issued 12/21/87 Final isnpection garage not removed, owner says she will, no remove 12/22/87 L ar from Mike Gaffron to Palms stating deadline for remova.' June 4, 1988 4/25/88 Council denies variance - Council gives deadline of June 1, 198 for removal 6/1/88 Site inspection garage still on site 6/2/88 Follow-up letter extending deadline 7 days 6/9/88 Site inspection - garage still on site 6/9/88 Citation issued 6/14/88 Letter from Palms to Lyle Oman asking for extension 6/21/88 Letter from Mark Bernhardson extending deadline until November 1 1988 11/1/88 Site inspection garage still on site ■ k “''' DECE^fi£•^0?,l938 D£^ft OfiONO -IvuNCii. MB^E55 I ^ “AVE TK:i: 7c SY HARO TO ASiOE 2V YOUR HARSH RULEITJlfWREMOVS THE eEAUTtfbL OLD Ga R a OE EOT v«>g jOST DON'T *<N>CW WHAT TO DO W(TH all the items THAT NEED TO 3E STORED. WE ARE WILLING TO GIVE uP Th£ SPACE IN THE NEW ATTACHED Ga RAGE AND USE IT FOR STORAGE AND PARK THE CARS IN Tf< OLD ONE. THIS WILL 6E A BIT INCONVIENT BUT WE WILL HAVE THE STORAGE SPACE AND BECAUSE OF THE LEGAL BATTLES wE having wiTh THE FOOLISH contractor that GOT US IN'^0 •'■HIS MCSS 'jV? CAN'^ AFCORO ‘'’“E LONG DRIVEWAY and etc . HOPEFUL lV THIS PLAN W'LL BE MORE ECONOMICAL. joe mfnnen of mennen excavation and mike gaffsonof your STAF« ARE PUTTING the PLAN TOGET«EO "'‘O BE SUBMITTED AT THE UANUARY COUNCIL MEETING. V»E Wia REMOVE THE PLAST'C U^iOER ROCK AROUND Th E aO HOUSE, Th £ CEMENT a PRCN AROUND THE OlO GAR a GE AND AS MoCH OF TmE OlO Tum N ABOUND tha TS P'l-SS'rt.E v*‘Ll RSH'O vE ’’HE T£MP«3RY GRAVEL DRIVE WAY AND REPLACE •i’ '-vlTH 6flA,5.5 AS outlined -N PREi VIOUS lET'I’ERS ’’HESE are the OTHER REASONS; ' w£ HAV£ »!0 BASEMENT A^lD wE NEED ^Ht SPACE FOR S rORAGE OF l AWN AMO SNOW removal , tools, LAKE ITEMS AND ETC. 2. IT SEEMS SO REDICULAS TO TAKE aw AY THIS BEAUTIFUL STRUCTOR TO replace I" WITH A TEMPORARY TVPF ST0R*6E SmEDD WHICH HAS BEEN SiiGGcSTED SO MUCH OF TUC beautiful OlD S^RUCTORS THAT DEPiCKED THE OUINTNESSOFTHE 1920'SAREA oflakemtka have been destroyed AND BEEN EITHER NOT RELPACED OR REPLACED WITH MOOEN STRUCTORS THAT THE LAKE IS LOSING ITS FLAVOR. WE WOULD REPAIR, PAINT AND PUT WOOD SHAKES TO MATCH THE VICORIAN MOTIF Of THE aO HOUSE THAT WILL ADO TO THE ATTR a CTI VNESS TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. 3. another extreme HARDSHIP THAT WE HAD NOT CONSlOERD UNTIL NOW IS THAT WHAT WE HAVE SPENT TO UPGRADE THE QUALITY AND SIZE OF THIS HOUSE 'T NEEDS A THREE STal L GARAGE FOR REGAINING THE VALUE 4k wE N€£0 “Ht V ACV ANi> A ..-f'Ji ^=P.£AKEi^ TH£ CO lO NCort^ w*MD 5. wt NEED tT AS A ^iO!S£ SRE ak Sj^ T-E SoS/ CO ‘V. •J:“' 4^- ■ w 6. wg -AVg PRCVEM TO TOO T-a T 3£C au S£ 0? CvN-TOuft -Jf Tht t a \0 At:. THt OflAINAGt OF NORT- ca 3T C0 a N£3 Rl'N •»< TO TAE STREE' A»<t NONE !NTO the LAKE SO Th £R£ wKH jLU Ni?T 3? a NV 'MOOOVEmENT tq r-^ Ecaoev 3T REMOVtNO IT 7.1 riA\/t Talked to my NEiOHSORS the COMMUNiTy and all HAVE SYMPATHIZED WITH OOR CAUSE TO KEEP THg AOOlTlONAt STORAGE AND HAVE either Given "heir permission to use their names or have SIGNED A PERTlSiON ON OUR BEHA l? YOu al RE a DY have SE'/ER ai . '.£■■^£95 WRITTEN ~0 YOu ON OUR BE-A-.r, SINCERLY..^\ 1. CHPiS AND D al £ KAu^'t r m -^1 V S( H M ^/SLxSS 4: c*'-0 ^ I*- t ~fs- 2SO* roM# j l-(ou$e. Ktt Cfc*.. U"7 9 <i*T. C#^4L- ‘r V. • h«ix> (kk ftxctis'^ Abt. $lb<* l*>Al ll JVoo ♦ fAi> s3HXt uiia I 3U<S< .^Ll 3^-6 . .^tX" ^ 2*ii\-»*M» w*r st»r*h/<t2U>» S2.2-V* itCV^dVlC r<Klf/fni«K’ OKt c-vv k /o/* -if. ioarMi®^4 J/, •« o S'7 .0 7V J., f^_..:' ,/ O «*/V !'il «i»«% CO f IJ. O r T (-1 *» ^ — I V A 1: U-..-------- r #1376 X tC ^ 5 ~ o |J 6^ i W < xU O **e V 0 «lr;to V V'/v; Vr» & \ ^ %- vJ I-* •1 < 51 g*r- <“c »• y *:> c •» > ,? - <* L ^i.gu _o -C 3 I u U -4> til \ ito o ^ o j;. I i:c C»'•r» >' •y' b > -o\ I ' <U * \fc' ir*. s a 3 I < •»V > A o >% > « 7 • II Dm ft Subjects Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator November 22» 1988 #1006 Chris 6 Dale Palm, 1710 Shadywood Road - Review of Recent Hardcover Proposal As a result of your recent meeting with Mrs. Palm, you have requested that I review the before and after hardcover situation on the Palm property. I have reviewed the original hardcover proposal, the proposal that was finally approved by Council, and building plans upon which a permit was actually granted, and have made a site inspection today to verify what items of hardcover currently exist. Based on the attached hardcover review and diagrams, I would make the following conclusions: 1. The house addition for which staff ultimately Issued a building permit, exceeds the 17.5% hardcover allowed per Resolutions #1936 6 2415, by 39 s.f. or 0.6%. An additional 67 s.f. of hardcover comprised of a concrete step and rock beds over permeable fabric were never given written authorization from staff (during the time the fabric was placed under the rock, it is feasible that staff gave applicants' builder a verlble OK to place the fabric). Total existing 0-75' hardcover is 19.7%. 2. In the 75-250' zone, the current hardcover comprised of house with attached garage, covered walkway, gravelled driveway, rock and fabric landscape bed, and the pre-existing garage and concrete driveway areas associated with it, result in a currently existing hardcover of 44.4%, far in excess of the 29% allowed in Resolution #1936. This comprises a 1,578 s.f. hardcover excess. 3. In the 75-250' zone, applicant suggests that removal of the existing gravel driveway and non-use of the attached garage as a garage, should allow her to keep the existing detached garage and concrete driveway areas associated with it. She also maintains that the house is smaller than was originally proposed, however the fact is that the addition was widened and lengthened in such a manner that the house is actually larger than was approved. In fact, removal of the gravel driveway and removal of the rock/fabric beds will still leave a 640 s.f. hardcover exces& within the 75-250' zo In order to meet the 29% limitation, not <*: Xy the gravelled driv j, but the bulk of the existing concrete parking apron would have t^' be eliminated. In my opinion, his would leave little or no room for guest parking nor would leave room for a back-up apron. It also would not accomplish the removal of a non-conforming garage structure that is 4.7' from the right-of-way line and about 1.5' from the neighbors' property line. Chris & Dale Palm, 1710 Shadywood Road November 23, 1988 Page 2 of 2 Staff Recoamendation - Given the likelihood that Council will continue to hold the Palms to the 29% limitation, it is still feasible to meet the 2,980 s.f. allowance by doing the following: A) Leave house/attached garage/walk-under entry as is (1,865 s.f.). B) Remove fabric under rock in 75-250' zone. C) Remove all of gravel driveway, all of detached garage and surrounding concrete and all of concrete driveway and parking area. D) Construct new driveway of 1,115 s.f. as follows: Apron 18*x26* Backup Pad 10'xl5' Walk Connection 3*x9' Driveway to Street 35*x8.3' TOTAL 648 s.f. 150 s.f. 27 s.f. 290 s.f. 1,115 s.f. If the applicants claim a hardship in that they lack suitable lawn equipment storage space due to the small size of the new attached garage, in my opinion that is a hardship brought on entirely by the applicants wn doing. They have just completed a major addition to this residence and had every opportunity to take the storage concern into account, especially given the fact that they knew tha* they were going to have to remove the detached garage. List of Exhibits - 3-Page Handwritten Hardcover Notes Feasible Driveway Plan Diagram of what has been approved by Council w - Diagram of Current Hardcover 11/2^88 ^ ^ Exhibit E - Original Proposal by Applicant Prior to Granting of Variances Exhibit F - Pre-existing and Originally Proposed Floor Plans Exhibit G - Plan Approved for Building Permit Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D (J) ^ Ar%. af^ //*2-2.- 2>S» ,e^^i^T-70 ^J ; *'■’*'• /«o A-«T" /Ot^fA.s-r-A*4**^efe,^owV ___ /*7.r>l i?7(<’ir7M4 ^urp •f;f.'^ /JottiiT X 2 S> / 7, S* X 2.V /. r X dp SVs^ . /• 5 “ X 3 4 X* ^ ,3 ,fMnc//(ccK 2.Sx2^ z.rx 5" *7^0 V^o W-S V/ TO 1 UiV.-r .4 NP r . _______ J2-<t7 s^. I^‘7%'JJofW^ f,^.^v-r pcMos sMo^^’ .____ C#rvl6.HT liY ST<M^ T>tr _ .^]> _fi«itLC. u/o£>«A. eoe»< js /Atspr t /f.«. y^P’ rzr^s H~^- A^hlTiOM _____ l«,ui(tJr . ■ ___ ________________ ___________________________ .(3) /V<9t<<-Sgj &tyL~fe.H^A!S^ ppcaAS rjQ^Jj ’riTWrg /.Z:SA (y&g&t AXf AtfvoA ;_ )&eso«-^ r7o>o s «t~ (y^^^srta *-J^Cl. i^5r7^c»j y/'2.2> ' & & x4/ur<k--» /;; 2,C.O r T-------- ;;//j?us5' !z,^ ^2- rh^^^Arr) 2 V >• 2.y U*At^iop««. ^2^1 krriry^ _ 5‘'£) 2-S,2- lU^de^fMUtA^yx/7 2.T 'f fi— /2-0 6e> V 30 X ^igAUtfl- .D<g»UfVjA^y •Z.OK HZ~" 5V0X PeT^C^Ari." 5-srO A <,AA s*-A«ao*^«> z.’S^x/oY'“ 2-6iOj 21 >< isr'' -C coO ta >7% /z.= /^jT )0 1 1 c. rrar V7 >e .. ji ...............if-----------Vss-s si.- / * ' ia^/r>^AX^ y •-r~------- 2,-7 .o s/.' /*- /Z^«L «r Vs5?k_-,z.‘^_bp»75-7S i.4, cyt«j. C^OKiC^LXASfOKi S (^.•/d^puotwyr v»MAgr . /a> 7 Jr2-r®’ Ce^wT . r' lrMt. i. «-C • _______ /2.ev<-^'«*V-_a'F i "73 S S . „0t.te«.,_____ (^_£ec^/^««iC d-fi^es ^ Vo 5 f . ti?^<U««5-, L.C, -------- /^TT“« C»iM-. Ooo»ex_ _<ftVD Cv«4^ftn-. -7_'5‘''»4ro' ^Vo r??. T® c^>/otT>w.c^ ^ibusr; ^iC.I\H^Aerf tAiitVrt*^ Z^.Oya ®0 ^A.*^ o4Ni TH*^ poiU^^ff^^ 4 2^1/ feiNT»*^ As -/s 7(.i^ a»(» •*'/<•*/ ^/&(mC (Ls*^-0'**~ P-ocJc. /Ai '^r-a-co -a«A- oF^ O^eL, p/wy^«AA-^ A^<^F 'bagT, Sv«^<2o4.jgy;^ ^ 4i,^C _oF Cm - v^ Ay J) -----M------------ -nr li 6owSTT*«<.CT' A>tiVAJ ^IVfUJAy Ofp^i / S' s ^. ^ _ P*>lr4A><!^S i .............................- .......... •= . 8 : ,_ ______ .. iSa<^F-/3H^ /oJ .X yr '.....- _____________ l^fcLF __-.....................................________________—_________ _________.___________ ' -TO ST-. //Zs-sjf J I \ ___ _ _ _ _L_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ . OoNFlUV\^ 0>^i^t:> rAe^ pLAf-^ AS /9r*7e. f-ifJf\U-'^ S'<'*i'l y, tS^erooM. It does not pv. '^ort to show oiiy other improvements or encroachments. fkUiPnoO- (; '1^ \lT5 I ho plat of "Shmly Wood'COFI IH ft GRO!mF.na, IM''. .......... ••• •• •• 1:11 * >«•« 0iU*» PjerVtrtsfc^ /» \ \ C4AJT^ (Tc^cil T?<iS >, \ \ V , V ---------------------------------------- A I* 4^/^4b AJ ^ e South fine oT to# /3 i ecrricl n-presentalien of a eurvey of the boundaricftof that part of Lot 11 lying Sout th«' Seuthvest corner of tho Korth 14 feet of eaid Lot? thonco South B7 degrees 27 winu rJ that part of Let 12, lying Northerly of 0 lino drawn parallel with and distant 71.2 •-r!y l!-.e ef Lot 13, all in Shalywood, an addition to the County of Hennepin f" •■'^c Tow / iSBOt 8^.//. H5oi 5^.//. hcnkevcr 1757* fiardcovet' 1 5) // /?^xr. i^*y/ rei**eye // yterr. —(>1^.^------------- Sri*^ t kN t C3 -J rSoulli UmofLof 15 0e>ctyfe^nouac ^ _ PLA^i ^S T=itJUlLi 6V(UT fkua>//jc^ tv' and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of that part of Lot 11 lying Southerly of the at the Southwest corner of the North 14 feet of said Lotj thence South 87 degrees 27 minutes East,to the ; and that part of Lot 12, lying Northerly of a lino drawn parallel with and distant 71.2 foot Northerly, , _ utherly line of Lot 13, all in Shadywood, an addition to the County of Hennepin in the Township of ,Orono, H^* of on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said County of Hennepin, and of^c y, thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. ^ the plat of "Shady Wood' desrribnfl nronr*»-tv < n COFFIN ft GROHDERG, INC. *5 1^ I f/ee'0Vs7?rj6.I7 N t',._______ .>,a M MMMF MM r.:-» U <>iA^QN :^1:: - v f TOOIV mt P^ .--i®^®SfSL^. PtAN**8frOO* ^ JJ4M^ '^1I'1 :*.; Mv r r: f5‘ .II •;f . ..-\ 1J I' , • ^5 f\\’ APR I 01989 L\ii_ _ _ _ [i^ April 8, 1909 Orono Village Couneil Orono Village Dear Council Member*, 1 am writing thi* letter to document my feeling* regarding the separate garage structure belonging to Dale and Chris Palm of 1710 Shadywood Road. I have been a resident of 1600 Shadywood Road for over twenty years, living two houses north of the P^lrris, The Palm* have undertaken a major rehabilitation project of their property and now have a large home with a fre# *tanding garage next to county road 19. In view of the fact that the council i* considering a request of the Palms to allow the garage to remain, I am providing the council with my feeling on this subject. 1 believe that it is actually a benefit to the neighborhood to have the structure in place in that it serve* as a sound^ barrier and privacy buffer for the houses along the lake. Tii# garage was built a number of*, years ago and has very good atructural quality and were the Palm* to finish the exterior of the garage the aesthetics would seem to me to be a plus for the neighborhood. 1 have absolutely no objection to this structure remaining in place a* X view it as a benefit. incerely. 'JohrTTol eman 1660 Shadywood Road Finn fe-- •j’'-'' ■*r :-••• i .• 1 - ]; I ' I , i 9/S/88 TO M80H IT HAT CONCERM: 1 aa a nalqhbor of Mt. and Mrs. Dala Pal*. S JS.S ES tKt*i» "niS’K.rt. garaq* which ia in diaput* ia 5'^**“*^*“^ old Victorian building which naighberhood, giving it a flavor of *^*5“ ^at and wa ahould all of ua guard , daatroying that flavor in favor ®* '^5* "* * I'a aura *oat of *y '**^®**^^*i'??“iS,t^baautiful with thia. I for ona would miaa that baauti old garaga and would ancourage tha court to MV* it a Very eincerelyp _ ^ ’ Mria Gerald Ta Finn 1640 Shadywood Road Nayzatap Mn. 55391 very nhJj^ •..«%.• »* ' V yr^riivy* \ ■ •■'■ ;a<"' '■.'-V. v V/y /V‘-V ■ -• *• * •/.' •-y--*.* • .. . March 28, 1988 City of Orono P.O# Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn* 55323 Attn: Jeanne A* Masbusth, Zoning Administrator Dear Madam: This letter is to express our feelings regarding the garage located at the residence of Dale Palm, at 1710 Shadywood Rd« After spesdclng with the Palm’s regarding the maintenance and upkeep of the garage It Is our opinion that they shouid be allowed to restore and have the use of the building. After four years on the lake we have learned what an enoamous amount of un usual and specific equipment Is necessary. We certainly prefer seeing a space free from clutter and the use of a storage building certainly prevents the stacking and piling up of seasonal Items. It is our opinion with proper care and maintenance the building should be allowed to stand. SlncerMy, Id Arthur Finkelstein >0doRd. 1710 Shadywood Road Wayzata^ MN 55391 April 4, 19a5L II © UMl,Ifi'i APR-6 2Orono Planning Comnission Manibers Orono Council Nonibers Orono City Staff Memeber CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Ladies and Gentlemen: I want to apologize for missing the March 20th planning meeting. I'm embarrassed and extremely upset with myself because I cut a working vacation short by 2 weeks so I wouldn't miss that impor tant meeting. I had it in ray head it was on Tuesday. I had been trying to schedule myself around January and February meetings that were on Tuesdays. I sat in the empty parking lot re-reading the notice that did say clearly Monday the 20th and not Tuesday. My plane landed Monday so I could have been there. This goof up seems typical of the misuxiderstandings and problems with this remodeling project. I'm appealing to your conipassion as a neighbor and fellow tax payer to allow us to keep this beautiful building for storage. I am confused by the negative statements made by the building staff, Nike Oaffron a*’id Jeanne Nabusth. Twice I've worked with them and the building connittee, and both times they stated they felt we had a legitimate reason to ask for variance. Yet when it goes before the board they say they can't recomnend it. First it was the hard cover issue. Now it seems a safety issue. To correct the hard cover issue we are more than willing and even excited about using the new garage as storage and work room, and the old garage for cars. We %iould move the door opener and etc - we would remove the muddy graveled temporary driveway I've had to endure for 3 years, sod it and plant trees and shrubs in front of the garage doors - when I can afford, it 1*11 replace at least one door with a nice win dows - we will remove all the plastic and gravel that is under the old landscaping - remove the extra foot of concrete around the old garage and the parking area and replace it with sod - we will replace the short driveway and back up area with red brick on sand - the walk to the house could be stepping stones so that 29 water can drain - we would bring the hard cover to just about what the original variance was approved at - we would paint and shingle the garage to match the old motif of the house. To address the safety issue really confuses me. The turn around and extra parking is not any different then on our original plan that was approved. We have 23 feet between the old garage and street curve for visibility. If safety is truly an issue, then the original plan should not have been approved. We should not have built this attached garage in the first place. We should have kept the concrete parking and turn around that we originally had. The attached garage was always a very low priority. I attended the very first building committee meeting with our crazy contrac tor and when the committee said we could add the garage but not remodel the house, I stated very clearly for my contractor build ing staf^ and committee to know that I had a perfectly good garage and was only interested in remodeling the old kitchen, bathroom and adding on 10 feet to the old porch off the kitchen for a family room. Had we realized that these professionals have not had our best interests in mind, we would have looked into things better. Now that we are living in the house on the lake where we don't have a dry basement, we realize how oadly we need storage space and a sound barrier from this very busy street. I am sorry to be such a nuisance, but I have been encouraged by at least 10 of my immediate neighbors of which the city or Mr. Bernhordson has 3 letters appealing to the council to allow me to keep the old garage. With the exception of Hr. Rhode, who will not answer my phone calls and who runs away from me in his filthy yard, I assume he doesn't want to face the issue how he has neglected the house and yard next door - everyone I speak with encourages me to pursue the issue. I must continue to pursue this because it makes no sense to remove a perfectly good structure that will add value to the property and community and replace it with a temporary shed and junk outside because there in no place to store snow plows, lawn mowers and etc.. Again I appeal to your sense of conscious as homeowners to allow us to keep storage space. Sincerel lAlO Fis Palm 1710 Shadywood Road Wayzata, MN 55391 April 4, 1989 April 4, 1989 Dear Mr. Rhode; I will answer you direct with copy to the city council. I can’t believe you could have the gall or nerve to complain aUbout the appearance of my garage when you have totally neglected and conscientiously let the house next door deteriorate. The yard had not been mowed but once last year by a neighbor boy whom you begrudged paying - everything from the mailbox that is never emptied of phone books from 2 years ago to the tall weeds in the yard, to the neglected house which is an eye sore to the com munity. We have not finished the improvements because this garage issue has been hanging in limbo and our case against the contractor. I know you have severely neglected your house. People have tried to rent or buy it aind you refuse. When we finish our property it will be beautiful. I also know yoi: abuse the truth when you say you don't like to write letters and cause trouble. Your original letter in 1985 objecting to our improvements is on file. What would you know about run down neglect - the whole property you own looks like a city dump. We need this building just to protect our investment from, to use your own words, "first class eye sore" of your property. Myself and several other neighbors will be looking into w’ you are proposing to do with your property. I think I can sp.for my neighbors that we do not want someone like you who is so dishonest and destructive as your total neglect of that property living next door to us. As far as safety - there is 22 feet more than a length of a car between the garage and curb. Again, to use your own words, you are full of "poppycock" and the biggest hazard is that your neglected property next door. Sincerely, Chars Palm Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A- Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administratcfi^^WlL MEETING March 15r 1989 3 #1383 Lillian Bonander, 3200 North Shore Drive - '*|tv /%•- Variances - Public Hearing Vi* List of Exhibits Proa: Dates Subjects Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Certificate of Mailing Exhibit D ~ Plan Exhibit E - Elevation Exhibit F - Survey/Average Lakeshcre Setback Exhibit G - Survey/Proposed Deck Pertinent Ordinances - Section 10,22, Subdivision 1 - The newly constructed deck will encroach approximately 7' beyond the average setback line. The existing deck encroaches 9*. The reduced encroachment results from the deck being moved further west to meet the 10' side setback and by reducing depth by 1' (review Exhibit D, F & G), Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Although hardcover will be slightly reduced with new construction, the new structural hardcover must be hardcover will be in excess of the allowed 25» in the 75-250' setback area. Existing 75-250* - 3,580 s.f. or 35.44% Proposed - 3,552 s.f, or 35.16% (Existing deck and stairs « 325 s.f., proposed deck and stairs « 297 S.f./ Review of Application that are* ^*’® existing lakeshore deck and stairs'F- K A“ V “be reduced bv^ ^+* the deck structure. The encroachment will Zoiiing File 91383 March 15, 1989 Page 2 of 2 Review of Findings and Hardships Voted by Applicant and Staff - !• Location of house on property, 2. Unsafe condition of existing deck structure and need for safe access from residence structure at existing lakeside door. 3. Overall improvement of substandard setback and slight reduction in hardcover within 75-250* setback area. 4. The new deck structure will no longer be located within the 10* si setback area along the west property line. Options of Action Available to Planning CdbsiI ssion - 1. Denial of application as proposed requiring a reduction in the existing structure that would not only meet the 10* side setback but the average lakeshore setback. 2. Approval based on one or more of the findings and hardships noted above. Zoning File #1383 Additional Coaents and Planning CoaBission RecoaBandation - April 4, 1989 The Planning Commission moved to approve the variance application as proposed by the applicant. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the recommendation of the Planning Commission. A RESOLOnON GRAmOG VARIAHC8S TO mmiCIPAL SONING CODE SECTION 10.22r SOBDIVISIOIIS 1 PILE #1383 ft 2 MHBREASf Lillian Bonander (hereinafter "the applicant”) is the owner of the property located at 3200 North Shore Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows; The East 57.75 feet of that part of Government Lot 1, Section 08, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, lying North of County Road No. 51, (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 ft 2 to permit the total reconstruction of a lakeside deck that will encroach 7' beyond the average lakeshore setback line (existing deck encroached 9*)# and requiring approval of 297 square feet of additional, new structural hardcover within the 75-250* setback zone, resulting in overall hardcover at 35.16% where only 25% is allowed (existing hardcover is 3,580 s.f. or 35.44%). Minnesota: WOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, PINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1383. 2. The property is located in the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 43,560 square feet or one acre in area. The property consists of 28,580 square feet or .65 acres. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on March 20, 1989, and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings and hardships: A) The location of the house on the property. B) Uns^'fe condition of existing deck structure and need for safe acces'. from residence structure at existing lakeside door. C) Overall improvement of substandard average lakeshore setback and slight reduction in hardcover within 75-250* setback area. Page 1 of 4 ’’^5 new deck structure will no longer be located within the 10 side setback rrea along the west property line* i* City Council has considered this application including the rindings and recomnendations of the Planning Commissionr reports by City staffs comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variances on the health* safety and welfare of the communitye 5e The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning distri2t; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDBR AND CONDITIONS m*.,. r* upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono 7a hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 fi 2 to permit the reconstruction of a lakeside deck requiring a hardcover variance for additional hardcover of 297 square feet resulting in total hardcover of 3,552 square feet or 35.16% where only 25% IS allowed within the 75-250' setback zone, and the reconstructed deck will encroach 7' beyrnd th-s average lakeshore setback line, subject to the following conditions: granted by this resolution run with the property not the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (April 10, Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of herself, her heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 2 of 4 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 10th day of April, 1989. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Property Owner(a) ——- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of April, 1989, by James R. Grabek & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public My Commission Expires Page 3 of 4 j, Ksceipc- ^ CITT OF OROHO - VAH:«»CB REPLICATION / J Initial Application Fee $150.00 | C C 3 ($50.00 per each additional varian(^ JL Renewal Variance Fee $7 5.00 ..w.llciVo (no change from original application) 01 Jc.V 1:0.00 After-the-Pact Fees (Double application fee) -,^rrv 7^ lzO.;X ———————— —— FROPBRTT LOCATION Site Address .. Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) "IcT / Please check one - Property X abstract or _ _ torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Phone (home) L/^ ^ ^ 1T6 $ Name «4//A4»^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (work) Tv- Address ; ^ City;Zip; ^ ^ t OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) ^7/^ yPs^ Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (work)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Address: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ City;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Zip;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date Property Acquired » ^if (month/year) I (do) ^do^^n^) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF FROPBRTT Present Zoning District 5; b€^ ^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Use of Property hi ^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Residential _ _ _ _ _ _ Other (specify) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OF RBQ^T <xZc^ Estimated Construction Cost $ ^ Describe request pi detail; __________________(__________ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width _ _ _ Hardcover Setback Variances (_ _ _ Front _ _ _ Side _ _ _ Rear) Other _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ Describe undue hardship or practical^ difficulty re^ulting^f^on. strict enforcement of zoning regula):ions: ...-y — DK^CRIPTIOH OF OHOSOMi FROPERTY COBDITIOHS . » j Describe unusual pr^erty conditions preventing compliance with Zoning ^ Code,Requirements; _ _i TTiL^ REQUIRED SUBMI 1. 2.C«?ilied P^r^it“?°c;:m«?List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center StampedV legal sized envelopes (#10) names on the above list with no return address (use address labels C.1C.1..10.. .. r.a"ir.a. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations> if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). AS an addendum to this application. Pl^se attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City __________________ The Aoolicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember th^t ySur variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. ____________________________ Certiflca^orbrzonlnrDepart^^^ that Variance Application is complete. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Zoning Official's Signature,Date APPL1CABT*S SIGNATUREThe Annlicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees unusual expenses incurred in review of this the information supplied is true and correct to the best his/her knowledge. DateApplicant's Signature agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of invest g tion and verification of this request- 0%mer' s Signature _ _ _ ■V7-Date ADDlicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25Planninrcommission Meeting. Planning Commission ““tings are held on t^e tht^ f^lnday of each month. Applicants must be P““"t f review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please maJte “rangements to authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Build g Office of this change prior to the meeting. ............................ - • ■ ■• -"•„ .•:^■r•::■•:•• tmm maxwell BAY) CBRTIFICATK OP MAILING STATE OP MINNESOTA COUNTY OP HENNEPIN CITY OP ORONO I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono« Hennepin County^ Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #138 3, was mailed to the attached list of property owners • In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 1st day of March, 1989. Jamie Bosma _L. • : -l-.-L ! i ! \J J -•4 . "» U- r-i '\r -- - .«psl.. 1 ‘3/ i4 < f ’. t • : . w ; ! 1 1J : ‘ i 1 ' 1 ' y 1 ; !, 1 i ' : ! ;1 i ! I r! ; ■1 32oo.iJ^og.Sj)j. :y j • • /.10.5>:—. Ill Ii i I I i I 'ill . = f'«---d3.5 l- , _ <• .1 ToistS - i'y: ip' - DSc\<^ujG " 1L% ,iJ* 8'.CoMC-fierc. Po-stiw^c - m. 'Dts^p , BlrW. N>ft:'rw K' f-TO, TRe A-rgc-^ ^?.'Lv•. .Toi.^r TO.^.-n ~>-cT£i ■arS -\ n VAo.iilg’ ■ i i i ! i :‘ i ^ ! ! : i i i 1 . l^iLcic^L(vJLS i4 oCi£ ?£. 1 1r !: ;r-kj !^ = , , i M 1 : : io fLci N.0 . 1flA^li i ! ! 1 ! ! i i 1 >-4 1 1 ! , 1 i i ; ■ M M 1 ! ! !ri MM! i • i ' !;i i . ^ ■ 1 i i ■ ’ i i , r h/)ftcA?ll [si pL * ’ ■ i ! 1 ■ ! r'N.i.' ' • ' ■■■ ■ : ! tv.Goti3<L-r£vjc-^ ^>U X\ \ ____ -ioose:'^ ' •1 I >• I 1- .—i i . . i »Mi'1 i > i • : : : ■ ! ■ 1 ■ • * 1 : * ! ■ ' ! :i ----------H V ^ « : ! 1 mi j 1 i i ; 1' : < • ' • ! ' ■ ! i M I ■:1 : i 1 • i ' : i ! • ; ' ! i ; j = 1 1 1 M M M -1 i ■ 1 i i ; ' : : I I ! ^ i ! if¥n M ! ! ! i 1 1 1 i M i ! ' ! !M M i 1 ■‘Mi Mil • 1 * 1 1 i < 1 t > 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 * t 1 : _' i 1 .Mil 1 M ^1 > ‘ 1 !M M 'i ■ i : •;If;trr ' 1 Wt M i M ‘ ‘ ■ ! !1 1 !i ■ • 0•: ;I I >'MM 1 • • t ^9 I 1■CRsasr*;•• -y 1 1 ^ ti .,... Fi r. _}A „? .5 ^ __ “ jr.J. ”_?-^* 10 ___________ __ . __________Jy.Ll" Coftvirg. ,. & E_€ A Vdot^ c.^ toe^-j -Uj rtv\ j b^_..iO^„<>_ex_ BF\c-fe___:__________ ___ Dates Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson COUNCIL 13''' 1 7. ’'IT'-' O'* Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator March 16, 1989 Subjects #1385 Board of Governors of Big Island Veterans' Camp Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing List of Bzhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit P Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit - Application - Property Owners List - Plat Map - List of Current Board of Governors - plnanclal Statement of Board of Governors ~ Big Island Facility - 1988 Annual Report - Key/Map - Renovation and Reconstruction Plan - Renovation and Reconstruction Plan - Hardcover Fact Sheet - State License/Camp Use - NPPA 224 - Elevation of Picnic Shelter - Site Plan of a Camp Site - Resolution #2459 - Topographic Map of Big Island - Schoell 4 Madson, Inc* (Mark Hurd, Arlal Photography) Pertinent ordinances - Section 10.31, Subdivision 3 (D) - Conditional use permit required for proposed overnight camping proposed at 30 camp site use. Section 10.31, Subdivision 3 (D) 1 - Area requirements. Total area -57 acres Required ■ 1 acpe per dwelling unit 2 camp sites » 1 dwelling unit 15 acres required for 30 camp sites Total remaining area for day use recreation - 42 acres Zoning File #1385 March 16r 1969 Page 2 of 5 Review of Current ^plication - The ‘ ^ Island Veterans' Camp was reopc'^'^^ for day use recreation on July ir ' The City Issued building permi* -9 for two picnic shelters (revle '.s L 6 O) In February of this year to complete the proposed Improvemei.. >r the day use recreation conditional use permit. The current conditional use permit application will complete the first phase of the renovation and reconstruction plan for the camp. In reviewing the proposed site plan, the campsites and picnic shelter within the southeast area (Point Charming) meets the required 40' separation. NFPA, Standard #224, grounds must be free of all weeds and small undergrowth brush for a distance of 100' around the entire over>nlght campsite. The present latrines that serve the day use recreation area located within the southeast area and the northeast area of the facility will also serve the overnight camp use. It may be appropriate at this time to designate the latrine at the southeast area of the property for overnight camp use only allowing the Peanut Row facility in the northeast area to remain for day use recreation. The City will accept the Department of Health's final recommendation'concerning the required number of fixtures In each latrine to serve the additional 30 camp site users. This may be the appropriate time to expand upon the existing latrine within the southeast area. One male and one female shower facility does not seem adequate for 30 camp sites. The areas of the assumed dralnfleld sites will be closely watched this season to determine If there is failure. Staff has never been able to determine the capacity or capability of the two existing systems for accepting the sewage. Applicant Is advised that any further intensification of use of the facility will require upgrading of existing septic facilities. All of the Improvements required by the City with the conditional use permit for day use recreation shall continue to be maintained with the overnight camping use. Applicants should be advised to Include In this conditional use permit axiy other structures proposed for the facility this year, l.e. latrines or picnic shelters. Zoning File #1385 March 16, 1989 Page 3 of 5 In review of the renovation and reconstruction plans for the facility, applicants must be advised that future cabin construction will require a separate conditional use permit review. If kitchen and bathrooms are planned within each of the cabins, a shared collector/septic dralnfleld area will be required. The conditional use permit will require septic testing and separate permit review by the State PCA. Applicant is also advised to re-evaluate the location of the proposed future cabin sites, if these future cabins are to be accessible to the handicapped and be located so that they are near the shared dralnfleld system. The permanent campsite located 40* from the latrine and picnic shelter in the southeast area should be relocated further away because of the heavy use of these facilities. This is a suggestion as 40* standard has been met. In review of Exhibit M, the site plan of a cs'npslte, staff would note that all Individual fire rings will be subject to NPPA and State Fire Code standards, and the Orono Fire Inspector. In periods of extreme drought, the City will continue to restrict open burning. It may be necessary to add another fire station at the new picnic shelter site In the day use recreation area (Playground and Dock area). This will be determined by the Orono Fire Inspector. m Options of Action Avsilable to the Planning CoaBissicn - 1.If Planning Commission denies the conditional use permit for overnight camping, please refer to the necessary findings in Section 10.09, Subdivision 2. 2. Approval of a conditional use permit for overnight camping, limited to 30 camp sites shown on a plan by Schoell & Madson, Inc. and Included with this memo as Exhibit 0, subject to the following conditions: A. Prior to opening the overnight camp use to the public, the Orono staff must inspect the facility to insure the following Improvements have been completed: 1. All low lying shrubs and weeds to be trimmed within 100* of the defined campsite area, area to be maintained In same manner throughout camping season. Zoning File #1385 March 16, 1989 Page 4 of 5 il. All fire rings fires per campsite to be installed per NFPA, State Fire Code Standards, and per the approval of the Orono Fire Inspector. Fire Inspector to advise if an additional fire stations will be required within the newly defined overnight camp site or Playground and Dock picnic areas. lii. City staff to work with environmental field services of the Minnesota Department of Health to ensure latrine in southeast area is furnished with adequate facilities for 30 C2unpsite user level. Iv. Submit a copy of the current liability/coverage for the Big Island Veterans' Camp operation including any special coverage for the overnight camping. B. Applicant to provide an updated site plan showing all new improvements and existing improvements, i.e. fire station, latrine areas, signage, lighting, fencing. This plan must be submitted prior to the Council's approval of the conditional use permit. C. If applicant proposes additional construction of picnic shelters or latrines for the 1989 season, this should be included with the current conditional use permit application. Applicant to advise. D. 1989 Joint Use Dock License by the City of o: no and the LMCD prior to opening of the camp. Applicant to submit an updated dock plan if boat density is to be increased in 1989 season. E. Applicant is hereby advised that if at a future time a conditional use permit is applied for to permit the construction of seasonal cabins (handicapped accessible) and if these cabins are to include bathrooms and kitchen areas, that the City will require septic Vtest information for the installation of a joint collector system. Such collector system will require a permit review by the PCA. Applicant is hereby advised that all cabin construction will be subject to the controls set forth in Section 10.31, Subdivision 11, Building Construction Standards, of the Orono Zoning Code. Zoning File #1385 March 16, 1909 Page 5 of 5 3, Tabled pending receipt of additional information, exhibits or final review of other reviewing agencies. Zoning File #1385 March 16, 1989 Page 5 of 5 3. Tabled pending receipt of additional information, exhibits or final review of other reviewing agencies. iits and Planning Cu—i salon RecoaMndatlon -Additional C April 4, 1989 Staff advised both Planning Commission and applicant that staff would be Inspecting the island facility at regular intervals to insure against any septic failure due to an overburdening of the existing facilities. Staff has no accurate knowledge as to the septic capabilities and whether It can support the increased use created by the overnight camping. The Planning Commission had really no major questions to ask of the applicant but were pleased to hear of the good results from the opening of the camp for day use recreation last year. Planning Commission concurred that the key CO the success of the overnight camping would be the close supervision by the inspection staff in assisting the applicant. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the approval recommendation of the Planning Commission. A RBSOLOTION 6RAMTIIIG A CONDTIONAL USB PERMIT PER MUHICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.31f SUBDIVISION 3 (D) PILE #1385 WHEREAS# Edward S. Morrow, Chairman of the Board of Governors, Big Island Veterans* Camp, (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interePt in the property located on Big Island per Orono classification Record Lot 1 within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as followsi Exhibit A, attached. WHEREAS# the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a Conditional Use Permit to allow overnight camping proposed at 30 camp sites at a maximum user level of 120 per daj based on the standard of 4 guests per tent. Minnesota: HOW# THEREFORE# BE IT RESOLVED oy the City Council of Orono# FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning ^lle #1385. 2. The property is located in the RS Seasonal Recreational Zoning District, per Section 10.31, Subdivision 3 (D.' 1. 30 tent camp sites will require 15 acres in area, the day recreavion use at a 240 user level requires 12 acres in area. The property consists of approximately 57 acres in area. 3. On March 20, 1989, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the and recommended approval based on theapplication as proposed following findings: A) The 57'(‘ acre site is large enough to support a day use recreation area and overnight camping use without any adverse affect upon the lake or upon the adjacent wetlands that are located within,the subject property. 3) The proposed use will have no negative impact upon the neighboring adjacent properties. Page 1 of 6 C) Based on the proposed level of use, the fire protection system developed by staff and applicant will provide the necessary precaution to maintain the public safety and welfare. D) The proposed use will require no variances to the required standards setforth in Section 10.31, Subdivision 3 (D). E) The City has received no negative comments from the permanent or seasonal residents of Big Island since the camp opened in 1988 for day recreation use. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the affect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow overnight camping will not be be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. a»iC1.0SIONS, ORDER AMD CORDITIOHS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.31, Subdivision 3 (D) to permit overnight camping at Big Island Veterans' Camp, Record Lot 1, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to opening the camp for overnight camping, the Orono staff must inspect the facility to ensure the following required improvements have been completed: A) All low lying shrubs and weeds to be trimmed within 100* of the defined camp site area. Area to be maintained in same manner throughout camping season. B) All eleven'rremaining buildings to remain secured as directed by the Orono Building Inspection Department. C) All designated fire stations to be ready for use for the 1989 season. Orono Fire Inspector to determine need for additional fire stations in new picnic and dock area. Page 2 of 6 D) Toilet facilities (Peanut Row and South Hill facilities) to be in an approved condition for both day use recreation and overnight camp use. The City to enforce directives of the Minnesota Department of Health regarding the number of fixtures required within each latrine to serve 30 overnight camp sites. E) Security lighting to be re-inspected by opening. staff prior to F) Site of helipad to be inspected. Applicant to provide an updated written emergency procedure for 1989 season. G) Submit a copy of current liability policy/coverage for both day use recreation and overnight camping. 2. The approved plan of operation for the 1989 season for the Big Island Veterans* Camp has been based on an improvement/site plan submitted by the applicant and attached as Page 6 of this resolution. 3. Approval of a Joint Use Dock License by the City of Orono and the L.M.C.D. for the 1989 season. 4. All changes in signage for the 1989 season must be approved by staff. No signage area can exceed 50 square feet. 5. Applicant is hereby advised that if at any time the existing septic facilities are determined to be insufficient or failing upon the regular inspection of the Orono staff, that all or partial overnight camp use shall cease. Overnight camping at the 30 camp site level shall not be reopened for public use until applicant has Installed adequate septic tr^iatment facilities to support sewage demands of the camp. 6. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owner, but are permissive only and must be completed within one year of the date of Council approval or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (April 10, 1990). 7. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 3 of 6 8. The undersigned owner has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terns of this resolution and on behalf of the Board of Governors of Big Island Veterans' Camp, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of t.^tle of the property. 1989. ATTESTI Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 10th day of April, Dorothy M. Hallin, City CJerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Property Owner(sT STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of April, 1989, by James R. Grabek & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor S City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public My Commission Expires Page 4 of 6 Resolution #__ _ _ Zoning File #1385 EXHIBIT A piitaawfi Morse Island Park; Thence South 350 feet to Lake Minnetonka; 'Thence East «long the shore of Lake Minnetonka to the East line of sa:.d Lot Three (3); thence North to the place of beginning (hereinafter "the property"); and i@iOWL« APR -6B89 1 k\m /5^’r CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE PROPERTY LOCATION (MSite Address j. ^ /-^)se_____>\au ov <. ^____________ __ ^ /I7- -^3- 21 ^c>QO\ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) />7~ ^3 >ooot_____ Please check one - Property X abstract or _ _ _ _ _ torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey.1111111111!1111111111I11!1111i1 M 1 HISPhone (home) Name ^Phone (work)53-?-0671f - - - -f-- - - - - - - - - - Address M City 1 Zip OWNER (if different than applicant) Name T‘T*<^ Phone (home) Phone Address PO. Sox City ^ >fC(?is/ov Date Prooertv Acauired M (month/year) I (^) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current; Fee After-•the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee $100.00 a)Residential accessory Use y $150.00 b)Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c)Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d)Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 f)Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore _ _ _ _ PRD/PID - see'fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation _ _ _ _ $150.00 Easement Vacation $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $250.00 Rezoning _ _ _ _ $100.00 Appeals _ _ _ _ Other “ see fee schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District P-s Present Use of Property t'ou.a I Residential _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Other (specify) davup DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail:f REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350* (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certificate of survey. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). Plat Map. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —p- — — —— — — — — — Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date ' APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. iP ' Jl .. -Av B.I - Co—d Z.Owner's signature ^p._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building fi Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. J J RUN DATE OA/22/68 BATCH 001 PROP AOOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP AOOR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 38 lA-117-23 3A 0001 BOARO OF GOVERNORS BIG ISLAND BOARO OF GOVERNORS 208 VETERAN SERVICE BLOC ST PAUL MN 55155 38 23-117-23 22 0002 2ANE SCHEFTEL ET AL I MARGARET SCHEFTEL BOX 176 EXCELSIOR rW 55331 HEfWEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 23-117-23 21 0001 BOARO OF GOVERNORS BIG ISLANO BOARO OF GOVERNORS 208 VETERANS SERVICE BLOG ST PAUL MN 55155 38 23-117-23 22 0018 J 0 UPAN i J 0 URAN JOHN 0 URAN BOX 290 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 REPORT NO. PI635A01 PAGE 1 38 23-117-23 22 0001 BOARO OF GOVERNORS BIG ISLAM) BOARO OF GOVERNORS 208 VETERANS SERVICE BLOG ST PAUL MN 55155 38 23-117-23 22 0019 SUBURBAN HEM4 REG PK OIST SUBURBAN HENN REG PK OIST 12615 CO RO 9 P 0 BOX 61320 PLYMOUTH MN 55661 TOTAL BATCH 001 0006 J 4 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPR SENTEO ARE AM ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY OEPARTT. (T OF PROPERTY TAXATION. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ANO BELIEF. DATE =14= Cj (X) Joe Backes (American Legion) 15708 Normandy Lane Minnetonka, MN 55345 (h) 949-2544 (w) 542-0 94 Don Knight (VFW) 1227 Lombardy Ave. Anoka, MN 55304 (h) 434-3577 (w) 757-4540 Norb Bosiger (Purple Heart) 2945 Fairchild Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 (h) 476-6245 Wilfred Viitala (DAV) 5700 Mt. Normandale Drive Bloomington, MN 55437 (h) 835-4083 (w) 291-1212 Stuart H. Gorney (VFW) 3240 N. Indiana Robbinsdale, MN 55422 (h) 588-8677 (w) 522-7138 Alar Wi^'darf (American Legion) 1809 N. Skyline Drive Burnsville, MN 55337 (h) 890-4379 (w) 890-4180 Gerard E. Kelly (DAV) 2809 Pahl Ave. N. E. Minneapolis, MN 55418 (h) 789-3934 (w) 781-7114 Larry Sharpe 1419 No. Albert St. St. Paul, MN 55108 (h) 646-9430 BOARD OF GOVERNORS BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER SO, tSB8 DMMILLER & ASSOCIATES, LTD. Licensed Public Accountants January 5| 1988 To the Board of Directors Big Island Veterans Camp Excelsiori Minnesota 55331 The accompanying statements of financial condition of Big Island Veterans Campi as of September 30i 19Sa» and related Statements of Incomei Retained Earnings and Statement of Cash Flow for the year then ended have been compiled by us. A compilation is limited t> presenting in the form of financial statements information tha is the representation of management. We have not audited or reviewed the accompanying financial statements and, accordingly, do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on them. Accompanyment D.H. MILLER k ASSOCIATES, LT^ 9001 E. Bloomington Freeway. Suite 110 • Minneapolis. MN 55420 • 612-881-3003 BOARD OF GOVERNORS BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30. 1988 ASSETS RESOURCES C»sh in Bank Cash in Bank Cash in Bank Checking Money Market Manager Fund 09/30/88 1, 171.50 37,408.88 299.3B 09/30/87 S==SS=S3 859.36 2,519.55 0.00 TOTAL RESOURCES 38,879.74 3,378.91 sssssssssssss LIABILITIES k FUND EQUITY LIABILITIES Accounts Payable FICA Withholding Tax Federal Withholding Tax State Withholding Tax 0.00 224.76 216.00 87.00 225.00 331.51 0.00 0.00 TOTAL LIABILITIES FUND EQUITY Fund Equity REVENUE OVER/-UNDER EXPENSES REVENUE - UNRESTRICTED REVENUE - RESTRICTED, 527.76 2,822.40 5,529.38 30,000.00 556.51 15,415.47 -12,593.07 0.00 TOTAL FUND EQUITY 38,351.98 2,822.40 TOTAL LIABILITIES k FUND EQUITY 38,879.74 sssssssssssss 3,378.91 sssssssssssss -SEE ACCOUNTANT'S COMPILATION REPORT- BOARD OF GOVERNORS BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP YTD REVENUE STATEMENT FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1383 YTD %09/30/88 rOMP %09/30/87 REVENUE Donations Received - Unrestricted 53.7 39,005.00 74.2 8,057.00 Donations Received - Restricted 41.3 30,000.00 0.0 0.00 Interest Income 2.2 1,623.50 5.2 558.90 Sale of Scrap 0.3 202.05 0.8 83.40 Promotional Sales 1.7 1,265.00 14.9 1,614. 10 Big Island Party 0.6 444.00 0.0 0.00 Vandalism Restoration 0. 1 7^.45 0.0 0.00 Refunds Received 0.0 0.00 5.0 537.98 TOTAL REVENUE TooTo ’727iT2700 Too7o 10,851.38 EXPENSES LABOR k LABOR EXPENSES Sa1aries 10.3 7,500.00 26. 1 2,833.58 Housing Costs •0.0 0.00 3.2 350.00 Payro11 Taxes 0.9 653.29 5.9 639.63 Employee Benefits 0.0 0.00 6.3 678.87 TOTAL LABOR k LABOR EXPENSES ”1172 ””87153729 “4175 4,502.08 SUPPLIER Building Repairs oo0.00 52.6 5,704.97 TOTAL SUPPLIES l o 1 • l o 1 1l o 1 ol o111111”5276 5,704.97 REPAIRS Machine Hire 13.0 9,453.25 0.0 0.00 Equipment Repairs 2.7 1,987.09 10.9 li 182.05 Equipment Replacement 7.8 5,634.17 0.0 0.00 TOTAL REPAIRS r “2375 “177074751 “Io79 li 182.05 ADMINISTRATION Postage 0. 1 44.50 0.0 0.00 Insurance 4.2 3,056.00 0.0 0.00 Permits 0.2 150.00 3.4 370.00 Feasibility Study 0.0 0.00 29.0 3,148.33 -SEE ACCOUNTANT'S COMPILATION REPORT- BOARD OF GOVERNORS BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP YTD REVENUE STATEMENT FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1988 EXPENSES Legal k Accounting Printing/Advertising Miscellaneous Survey Office Equipment/Supp1ies Big Island Party Expense TOTAL ADMINISTRATION OPERATIONS YTD COMP %09/30/88 %09/30/87 1.5 1,099.60 11.3 1,229.62 3.2 2,304.88 39.4 4,273.33 0.2 109.10 0.6 64.61 2.5 1,828.84 0.0 0.00 0.1 81.85 0.0 0.00 1. 1 809.00 0.0 0.00 TsTi “9748377T “8378 9,091.89 Electricity k Telephone Dock Rental Gas and 0 i 1 Volunteer Help - Meals Trash Hauling 1.8 0.3 0.8 0. 1 0.3 1,277.59 195.00 614.05 84.21 200.00 9.7 1.2 3.0 7.4 0.0 1,053.50 130.00 325.92 800.00 0.00 TOTAL OPERATIONS "”375 273707s5 ”2173 2,309.42 TOTAL EXPENSES “5i7r "377082742 21070 22,790.41 NET REVENUE OVER/-UNDER EXPENSES “4879 “357^29758 -Tro7o -11,939.03 OTHER INCOME Prior Year Expense Cancelled 0.0 0.00 0.7 74.36 TOTAL OTHER INCOME “”o7o o7oo “*"o77 74.36 OTHER EXPENSES Prior Year Wages 0.0 0.00 6.7 728.40 TOTAL OTHER EXPENSES ““o7o o7oo ””67?728.40 NET REVENUE OVER/-UNDER EXPENSES REVENUE - UNRESTRICTED^ REVENUE - RESTRICTED ““7T7 41.2 s s a a s ””57529758 30,000.00 aaaaaaasss -11671 0.0 a a a a a -12,593.07 0.00 aaaaaaaaaa -SEE ACCOUNTANT'S COMPILATION REPORT- BOARD OF GOVERNORS BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP STATEMENT OF FUND EQUITY FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 198B BEGINNING FUND EQUITY/UNRESTRICTEO REVENUE OVER EXPENSES - UNRESTRICTED REVENUE OVER EXPENSES - RESTRICTED ENDING FUND EQUITY Y-T-D ======= 40 5,529.58 30,000.00 38,351.98 -SEE ACCOUNTANT S COMPILATION REPORT- BOARD OF GOVERNORS BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1988 FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Receipts over Expenses Decrease in Accounts Payable Decrease in FICA Tax Increase in Federal Withholding Tax Increase in State Withholding Tax YTD 35,529.58 -225.00 -106.75 216.00 87.00 Net Increase in Cash ?o,500.83 FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES -0- FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES -0- Beginning Cash - October 1, 1987 Checking Money Market 359.36 2,519.55 Ending Cash - July 31, 1988 Represented By: Checking Money Market-Unrestricted Money Market-Restricted Manager's Fund 1,171.50 7,408.88 30,000.00 299.36 3,378.91 38,879.74 S3S3SSSSS3S 38,879.74 3S3SS33SS33 “SEE ACCOUNTANT'S COMPILATION REPORT- BOARD OF_GOVERNORS BIG Thland^veterans'camp NOTE A: Authorisatian- The BOARD OF GOVERNORS - BTG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP wa? created by action of the Minnesota Legislature. The authority is embodied in Chapter 152 of the Laws of Minnesota for 1985. The BOARD is not a state agency. The Department of Administration transferred the title of the property to the BOARD OF GOVERNORS on November 2i 1985. The Camp was not operated in 19RG and 1987 due to restrictions placed upon the facility by the City of Orono. The expenses represented in these statements include materials and machinery necessary to commence compliance with the governmental requirements. The Act further provides, "the transfer must include all equipment and nonstHte /unds currently under control of the Commissioner of Veterans Affairs atid for use in connection with the Camp". Accordingly, the State transferred $29,400.93 to the BOARD OF GOVERNORS in 1986. NOTE B: Status- The BOARD OF GOVERNORS - BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP was recognized by the Internal Revenue Service on November 27, 1935 as an "exempt" organization under Section 501 (cl 19 of the Internal Revenue Code. On May 21, 1986 the STATE OF MINNESOTA Department of Revenue recognized the organization as "exempt" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 290.05, Subdivision t. NOTE C: The BOARD OF GOVERNORS - BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP LAKE MINNETONKA supervises and manages the Camp. (The act states a nine member board, however, provision was only made to appoint eight members.) Two members are appointed by the state level organization of the American Legion, the Disabled American War Veterans, the Military Order of the Purple Heart and the Veterans of Foreign Wars provided that at least two appointees are Vietnam Veterans. NOTE D: Ei=:£ai_X£3E" The By-laws adopted by the organization provide for a fiscal year commencing October 1st and ending September 30th each year. NOTE E; OEbSE-EliQiiS' This report covers the Operating Fund. The BOARD OF GOVERNORS is also in charge of land, buildings and equipment which was "transferred on November 2, 1985, No representations of these items are included in this report. NOTE F•VoluntUrf- Since title to the proprtjr was transferred from th5"§tite7 many hours of volunteer labor have been provided to assist in the clean-up and repair of the (.'rounds and buildings at the Camp. Records of these donated services are available, however, they are reported as substantial by BOARD OF GOVERNORS members. NOTE Cl The donation was expressly for the construction of a dming shelter and the BOARD OF GOVERNORS has the control over desip and construction. The restriction will be lifted upon the completion of this specified facility. BOARD OF GOVERNORS BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP LAKE MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 1988 ANNUAL REPORT Subject: 1988 Annual Report Greetings from the Big Island Board The 1988 fiscal year has been a year of accomplishments for the Big Island Veterans Camp. As Is reflected in the attached report significant mile stones were attained In a number of areas. Among them: . The removal of a total of 32 of the 43 buildings on the Camp was completed. Tliese non-conforming structures will be re placed with new buildings over the next several years. . Relationships with the City of Orono have been greatly improved with the Board receiving praise from the City Council and Staff. . The Camp was approved by Orono and was re-opened for day camping in July. . Significant fund raising has been accomplished and the Camp is in a much improved financial condition. . A reconstruction master plan is under developriw^nt with building slated to begin in Spring, 1989. The dedicated support of a number of veterans and other Individuals have allowed us to turn the corner in re-opening this valuable recreational asset to use by Minnesota Veterans. Your continuing support is solicited in assisting us in completing reconstruction in the years ahead. Sincerely, Si Alan Wisdorf Chairman Big Island Board of Governors 1988 Annual Report for the fiscal yea.* ended 30 September 1988 In accordance with the provision of Minnesota Statute Chapter 197, the fol lowing annual report is submitted coj.L;.-ning the activities of the Big Island Veterans Camp Board of Governors. Summary Extensive demolition, clean-up and renovation activities resulted in the Camp being re-opened for day camping by veterans in July. Planning and fund rais ing for reconstruction of facilities and buildings is well under way and re lations with the City of Orono have improved dramatically. 1988 Accomplishments 1. Camp Re-opening The Camp was re-opened fof* day camping on July 10, 1988. The re-dedi cation ceremony was attended by over 200 people and included a flag rais ing by Charles Lindberg, the sole remaining Iwo Jima flag raising veteran. The re-opening was the culmination of an intensive clean-up and renovation activity that brought the Camp into conformance with Orono requirements and removed all hazardous buildings and conditions. (See attached news article) 2. Demolition and Clean-up A total of 32 of the 43 buildings on tlie Camp property were demolished and completely buried, burned or hauled away. All 32 buildings were be yond economical repair and were considered to be hazardous by the City of Orono and the Board. The remaining 11 buildings were renovated to approved standards or secured completely pending renovation. In addition, over 200 yards of debris were trucked across the ice to dumpsters during March. Berg Hall was buried on-site and extensive clean-up of deadfalls and stumps was accomplished. 3. Renovation Fencing was erected along the Point Charming cliff area and the Point Charming latrine was renovated to meet appropriate standards. A new pump was installed in the Camp well and the well head was im proved to state standards. The caretaker's cabin was repaired and Camp equipment was brought into operational status. 4. Camp Manager A full time year around Camp manager, Mr. Mark Peterson, was hired in Spring of 1988, and has worked diligently on-site to bring the Camp to its current operatic; il status. Mr. Peterson resides on the Island during the summer months and provides fund-raising and support activities during the winter months. (See attached news article) 5. Financial The fund raising activities during 1988 were highly successful due in large part to Board Treasurer, Mr. Stuart Gorney. Cver $70,000.00 was raised in 1988 with $30,000.00 denoted for building construction. Do nations allowed well improvements, a new outboard motor purchase. Camp manager hiring and financed the entire process leading to Camp re-opening We are confident that the financial support shown by various veterans posts signals a commitment to the continuation of Big Island as a vet erans camp. (See attached 1988 Financial Report) 6. Legislative A legislator's tour was held on October 12, 1988. Attendance was limited because of election campaign activities; however, key personnel from the House and Senate Veterans Affairs Committees visited the Camp and expressed their support for our continuing success. Legislative priorities have been established by the Board ind it is expected that testimony will be given to both House and Senate Committees during the upcoming 1989 Session. 7. Employee and Volunteer Labor It is estimated that over 1,185 hours of employee labor and 950 hours of volunteer labor were expew^d in 1988. In addition donations of equipment use such as trucks, dumpsters, boats and other items were •approximately $5,000.00 in value. fc ^rono Relations Relations between the Board and the City of Orono have improved dramatically during 1988. Members of the Board, volunteer per sonnel and the Camp manager have worked hard to alleviate Orono Council and Staff concerns The Board h" be.,i greatly praised in Orono Council sessions and we are hopeful our excellent re lationship will continue during the reconstruction phase. 1989 OBJECTIVES 1. Operational Expansion Boa*':' expects to expand our current day camping authorization to include overnight tent camping by Spring, 1989. Most required actions have been completed including a survey of the Camp. 2. Reconstruction The completion of a phased reconstruction plan that outl1r.es the build ing of new picnic and cooking VjmJ: yv, latrines and handicapped ac cessible cabins slated for Ott;;uary, 1989. The plan will be developed in concert with Orono officials and will allow incremental renovation and ''3tonstruction as funds become available. We have interest from vete!”di-.s posts in sponsoring buildings and othe- projects and have es crowed $30,000.00 in d'-nations that is earmarked for specific projet 3. Promotional Activities A promotional plan irunder development and full color posters have been n* - We have secured the volunteer support of an advertising agency and expect to secure reasonable media coverage in the coming year. In closing, the Big Island Veterans Camp is operational, politically sound and developing a solid financial base. We remain committed to our charge as set forth in Minnesota Statute Chapter 197 and solicit your support in keeping Big Island as a veteran's recreate;v'^al 2j.?et. Respectfully submitted Alan Wisdorf ^ Chairman Board of Governors Big Island Veterans Camp P. 0. Box 598 Excelsior, MN 55331 BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP RE-OPENING Sunday July 10th. What o beautiful summer day for the re opening of the camp on Lake Minnetonka, after having been closed the past four years. This camp was first established in 1920 as a Rest and Recreation center for the veterans of World War One. 58 acres of beautiful woods, picnic areas, and shore line to enjoy. Sunday more than 250 peo ple attended a flag raising ceremony signalling the re opening of the camp. Alien Wiesdorf of the American Legion as Master of ceremonies spoke of the immediate plans calling for it's operation as a day recreation camp while the prep arations are being made to ac commodate overnite tent camp ers. Long range plans include the construction of har dicap- ped accessible cabins ind pic nic/cooking shelters as funds become available. Brief speeches were made bv Lindberg, Tom Curtis, and Jerr\ teau prior to the flag raisings. Chuck and Tom were given the honor of raising the American' and POW-MIA flags as the signal of re-opening the Camp. Shortly afterward the group raised a second American flag at the dock area. AH three flags were donated by the Post. A beautiful sight to see. Ail three flags whipping about in a cool gentle breeze. After the flag ceremonies the crowd broke up to enjoy their picnic lunches and a beautiful afternoon. A great big "THANKS" should be given to the media for their coverage of this very special event. Channels 4, 5. 11, and 17 each had teams of reporters and cameramen to cover the day's events. And conducting intervie vs of Chuck, Tom, and other participants. Mention should be made that a contingent of the 385th En gineer Group, Army Reserve from Fort Sneiling was also there to participate in the event. Many people commented on the newscasts of the different stations. The media's participa tion is greatly appreciated by all the veterans. Events such as this may help to dispel the out dated pubic misconception still held by some that the Veterans organizations are little more than drinking fraternities. Once again, THANKS MEDIA for the coverage. Time should also be taken to thank the several boaters who gave the crowd such assistance to get to and from the island when the paddlewheeler, Lady of the Lake was unable to taka us to the island. Thanks much. Oh yes, our Post bus was ticketed on the way home for having expired license tabs. Shame on usi Bill Holman, Publicity Officer 'r I 1 4•■’••r: „..4. II wi . .1 •til BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP RENOVATION AND RECONSTRUCTION PLAN 14 DECEMBER 1988 Background The Big Island Veterans Camp was re-opened for day camping in July, 1988, after a period of clean-up and renovation. A number of the Camp buildings had fallen into disrepair and 32 of the 43 buildings in the Camp property were razed in 1988. The eleven remaining buildings were either renovated, secured or converted to storage use prior to Camp opening in July, 1988. Objective This docuMent sets forth the planned renovation of existing buildings and facilities as well as the construction of new buildings and facilities. The strategy throughout our planning activities has been to integrate the follow ing characteristics: 1. Project Approach Each of the projects set forth in the plan is of a defined scope and will be initiated separately. While multiple projects may be under way at a given point in time and may support or rely on each other, the focus on approved projects will ensure their timely completion. 2. Incremental Funding As funding is made available to initiate a given project, application for its initiation will be made to Orono. This attribute also allows us to focus on current project completion before initiating other un funded projects. 3. Project Priority Projects are arranged in priority in order to support the planned evolution of Camp operations. 4. Flexibility This plan represents our best plan for renovation and reconstruction Some level of flexibility in priority and projects will be required but will be kept to a minimum. Operational Evolution The renovation and reconstruction of the Camp will proceed in three general phases: Phase 1 - Day and overnight tent camping facilities Phase 2 - Handicapped accessible cabin construction Phase 3 - Operational enhancement Some projects within a given phase may overlap another phase; however, the Overall strategy is an orderly evolution of operational capabilities. Reconstruction and Renovation Sites 1. Southeast (SE) - Point Charming Area 2. Northeast (NE) - East of Peanut Row Area includes Peanut Row latrine site 3. North and Central (NC) - Includes all existing buildings other than Peanut Row and Point Charming latrines 4. Playground and Dock’-(PO) - Area immediately west and southwest of main pavi1 ion 5. Northwest (NW) - Area northwest and west of playground (See attached map #1) Overall Concept Construct new picnic buildings and latrine/shower buildings to support day and overnight tent camping use. Renovate old main dining hall for use as a visitor's center and repair other existing storage buildings and caretaker's cabin as necessary. Construct 10-12 handicapped accessible cabins at SE location. Expand services and buildings in NE and NW areas if required for additional day, tent or cabin use. Phase One - Scope and Projects Phase 1 - Day and overnight tent camping facilities This fiise provides for the erection of four picnic and three latrine and shower buildings with new septic tanks and fields, and renovation of existing buildings. Project lA - SE picnic building construction Project IB - PD picnic building construction Project 1C - visitor center renovation - foundation and other re novation - major on-going project Project 10 - PO latrine/ nower buildir? construction building and septic field for 4s and manager's cabin Project IE - SE latrine/shower building construction building and septic field for 4s + 10-12 cabins Project IF - NE picnic building construction Project IG - NE latrine/shower building construction building and septic field (tent camping area) Project IH - storage building renovation - limited renovation of storage buildings to repair and improve security Project II - NW picnic building Phase 2 - Handicapped Accessible Cabin Construction This phase provides for the construction of ten handicapped accessible cabins in the SE area. Each cabin will be connected to the septic systems installed in project IE. Refer to attachment for drawing and floor plan. Project 2A - cabin #1 Project 2B - cabin #2 Project 2C - cabin #3 Project 2D - cabin #4 Project 2E - cabin #5 Project 2F - cabin tfS Project 26 - cabin §7 Project 2H - cabin #8 Project 21 - cabin #9 Project 2J - cabin #10 Project 2K - handicapped ramp and trail construction improvement of existing hard-surfaced trails and building of sidew^ between cabins and to oeach Phase 3 - Operational Enhancement Projects for this phase will be defined based on operational needs; however, the following general ground rules apply. The SE and NW areas are for cabin development, while the NE area is dedicated to tent camping. A monument has been considered for inclusion in the Camp and the building of a year-round house for the camp manager to provide security is also a possibility. • ^31a M s ’^I'cs-Kic ^ HARDCOVER CALCULATION HORKSHEI A-F+o SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' (/5-250'j 250-500' 500-1000- Existing Hardcover in Zone \ j i A. House 3 7^ile“F/si\^ujey< Hall LENGTH IC> Pl'cviiCL Picvifc ^ __lA- "? 1^1 ^ ft o» 4ARAee ^ f D. Sidewalk E. Patio / Deck F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY , . PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other X Y X X X X X X X X \ I \ ')-•3'^ ^?Or' WIDTH \L 76 •7^ :3 H Total Hardcover in Zone 7(^ 10X4 II 5x <?oo O S.F. S.F. 7.^4^ S.F. X3(^H ___ ___ S.F. . S.F. . S.F. . S.F. . S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.^ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 8.P. in Total Property Area in Zone -S’^ $.F. I B | X,S70,0-*° ^ ^ _ _ _ _» fe %/ S, SiY E9 MiniiMOM 0«p«mn«nt of Health Environmonial Fiaid Strvicot 717 SE Oolawaro Si.. P O. Boi 9441 Minnaaoolia, Minneaota S5440 612'623-S33S •t PRIMARY UCENSE: (first licansa issuad to Park or Camp) ANNUAL UCENSE Yaar Round (over 6 months): — Saasonal (6 months or lass): Ucatfon for Liconso to Opointt a MSiufbeturad Homo^Park and/or a^onajXampiiy Area S7S.OO for aach SO sites or fraction tharaof $15.00 for aach 10 sites or fraction thereof Maximum of $450.00 S11.25 for aach 10 sites or fraction tharaof Maximum of $337.50 ^ SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR FEE SCHEDULE. COMPLETE WORKER'S COMPENSATION SECTION ^ ADO $10.00 LATE PAYMENT FEE IF APPLYING AFTER JANUARY IS FOR ANNUAL UCENSE OR 15 DAYS AFTER OPENIf FOR SEASONAL OPERATION ^ MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO: Minnesota State Treasurer u NEW UCENSE INsw Sarss muu snsen lagsl CMcnsMn of sits, indtidt ail prapany ipr prosam or fuiura waa.)• V RENEWAL C OWNERSHIP CHANGE nrawous Oporetor Oaia ^rchasad Last lleonaa na.wee iisuod for the followino ouantitv of: Namo of Ucansoa Iparaon. Rrm or corporMioiU Bid Taiapnona ) MaiHne Addrska lindudo tip cedol Pd), fiox S<!?€: )c c e isl c Kl'/ In • SS is if Part or Camp Trade Nemo 1^1 JT% la ^ A I'f'h fnv~tx u i C a uJi f . A t 1 lube 'h? M Coumy M U e* f' 1 H TownaHip d) V O w\ c Pott Ohica ir€ f*\ St e%' ^MtiMTiHia Of Corporttion — liM Offleors: UL'i's d.-t f av-T 400WCSS ' I2IOO SS.Hr '/If pis. Operation: Q Year Round Saasonal (Mat opening data and months of operation): fTfsty IS , 5^ tuent'Ky No. of Sites: No. of Sites Occupied: . Mobile Home Sites _INoio: OsesnSswe ihas are t , Mobile Home Sltss . ohotx M««sr csAnseMiA«.i . Oepandent Camp Sitae . Independent Camp Sites . Independent Camp Sites .Number of Fixtures m Central Building if provided:TOILET SEATS SHOWERS URINALS WASHBASINS Is Swimming Pool provided? J yes no If Primitive Campground list number of prtvles; Mon:///A Women:a./O Ji Water Supply: Sewage System: C municipal □ municipal ^ private private No. of ahas with individual water '«ook<upe: No. of sites with individual sewer hook-ups: You must submit plans in triplicate for new construction or alteration. Ucense cannot be renewed without this department's pri< approval for additional sites. You must submit a copy of an approval permit from the municipaliiy or county in which the par) c camp Is located or a statement from that municipality or county that no permit is required. No license will be issued until e requirements have been met. Foe Late Psyment Pee TOTAL Ha-01IB3Ot licsnsss's Signsiurs 224-1 6'1979 NFPA, All Rights Rsservad Standard for Homes and Camps in Forest Areas NFPA 224-1979 ceived following public aocumemaiion in i»/o ana Association at the Annual Meeting in St. Louis, Missouri, on May 16, 1979. leased by the Standards Council for publication on June 11, 1979. This te.x^ supersedes previous editions adopted in 1974, 1972, 1969, 1953, and 1952. f CONTENTS 224- ? i ■1 II •*? Concents Foreword.................................................................................. 224-, 4 Chancer 1 * Incroduccion.......................................................................... 224- 4 M Scope........................................................................ *24- 4 1-2 Purpcne............................................... :.................................................224- 4 1- S General.......................................i....................................224-4 Chapter 2 Area Fire Protection ................................... .224- 5 2- 1 Building Location......... 224- 5 2-2 Water Supply ........................................ 224- 5 2-5 Access Roads or Areas.........................:..................................................224- 5 2- 4 Alarms................. ...................:...............................................224- 5 Chapter S Structures ........................................ .............................224- 5 S-1 Building and Fire Safety Codes...............................................................224- 5 3- 2 Structural Requirements................................... .......................224- 5 3-3 Exiu ........................................................-...............................................224- 5 3-4 Interior Finish............................................................................................224- 6 3-5 Roof Coverings .....;.......................................................................- • • 224- 6 3- 6 Spark Arresters........................................................ 224- 6 Chapter 4 Electrical Equipment.....................................................................224- 6 4*1 Installation aAd Safety Precautions...........................................................224- 6 4- 2 Radio and Television Equipment..................................................224- 6 4- 5 Lightning Protection.......................................... 224- 6 Chapters Heating and Cooking Equipment.......... ...................................224- 7 5- 1 Chimneys and Flues..................................... 224- 7 5-2 5-3 Equiinnent Burning Solid Fuel.................................................................224- Outdoor Barbecues...................................................................................224- 5-4 Equipment Burning Fuel Oil...................................................................224- 5-5 Equipment Burning Gas ..........................................................................224- 5-6 Open Flame-Type ^uipment..................................................................224- 7 7 7 7 7 5- 7 Storage of Combustibles and Flammables...................................224- 8 Chapters Public Camp Sices.........................................................................224- 8 6- 1 Fire Protection Obligations .........................................................224- 8 Appendia A ..... ............................................................................'...............224- 8 Appendix B General Fire Protection ..........................................................224-11 Appendix C Bibliography.............................................................................224-13 224-4 HOMES AND CAMPS IN FOREST AREAS Foreword This publication has been prq>ared as a guide for of ficers of f re agencies for the enactment of necessary regulaiicns. It will also serve tc- acquaint home ov/ners. resort owners, and other* with certain good practices to prevent structural fires in forest areas and damage to valuable timberland and watershed areas. Throughout thp United States and Canada, in forest areas, permanent homes, cabins, summer camps, and resorts are being built in increasing numbers. The crowd ing of cities has increased the desire for country living and each year more people are enjoying the beauty and natu ral vari^y of forest h ' . This migration t. rests and watershed areas brings a year-round iit< ,>revention problem. Durinr the summer season, particulai ly, fuel and weather ons unite to produce the most hazardous fire situati. When a fire does get started in forest areas it is quite different from the city fire, where discovery and response usually entail short ttavel time. Urbr.i fire departmentr can reach the scene of a fire quickly with adequate equip ment, manpower, and water supplies so that they most instances, extinguish a blaze promptly. Sv< seldom the case in forest areas. The light constructii. many homes, the flammable cover growth adjacent to ^ site, the relative inaccessibility to fire fighting apparatu>, and lack of water supplies create a difficult condition. Once a building fire gains headway, total destruction usually results, with the added danger that flying brands may start a fast-spreading forest fire or ignite other near by structures. Since the danger also exists that a forest fire may in vade the residential area, certain precautions are neces sary to protect these structures. Therefore, it u essential that uniform standards and prevention measures be adopted. The National Ffre Codes’^ and other publications of the National Fire Fotpction Association. Inc. are ap plicable 'o the consfciw. ion and safeguarding of forest properties and should be followed for detailed fire control and fire safety information. Always check with local authorities regarding building codes. They may vary from none to quite comprehensive, usually on a county basis. Standard for Homes and Camps in Forest Areas NFPA 224-1979 NOTICE: An asterisk (*) following the number or tetter designating a paragraph indicates explanatory materiat an that paragraph in Appendix A. Chapter 1 Introduction 1-1* 5c<q>e. This standard contains fire protection ,e- quirements for homes, cottages, camps, multiple oc cupancies. and tracts or subdivisions of mobile hemes or recreational vehicles in forest areas where indoor or out door fires may endanger life or property. Purpose. This publication is intended to serve as a ! tdard for officers of fire control agencies. It can serve basis for regulations in areas not otherwise covered by ir.-zed fire protection and as a practical advisory <id^ V‘»r property owners in forest areas. It will also serve acquaint home owners, resort owners, transients, and ..cber forest area owners with specific good practices to prevent structural fires and save life in forest areas and prevent or minimize damage to valuable timberland. grazing land and watershed areas. 1-S General. When a fire does get started in fores: areas it is ouite different from the city fire, where discovery and response usually entail short travel time. Urban fire departments can reach the scene of a fire quickly with adequate equipment, manpower, and water supplies so that they can, in most instances, extinguish a blaze promptly. Such is seldom the case in forest areas. The light construction of many homes, framed canvas (plastic) tents, the flanunable cover growth adjacent to the site, the relative inaccessibility to fire fighting ap paratus. and lack of water supplies create a dimcult con dition. Once a building fire gams headway, totUl desmic lion usually results, with the added danger *.nat flying brands may start a fast-spreading forest fire or if^ite other nearby stnr ^nres. Since the danger also exists tl a a forest fire may in vade the iT^ideniial area, cert&i:: ^precautions are neces sary to protect these structures. Therefore, h u essential that uniform standards and prevention measures be adonted. AREA FIRE PROTECTION/ STRt’CTL'RES 224-5 Chapter 2 Area Fire Protection 2-1 Building Location. 2-1.1 Buildings used as homes or camps in forest areas shall be located at least 40 ft (12.2 m) apart and attempt shall be made to gain maximum advantage of firebreaks created by streams or roads. Where there is organized fire protection, the authority having jurisdiction may alter these distance provisions. Buildings shall be separated ac> cording to recommendations of NFPA 80A, Protection of Buildings from Exterior Fire Exposu 2-1.2* A space of 100 ft (30.5 m) or more, cleared hazardous vegetative growth and other flammable / materials, shall be maintained between a building and surrounding brush or heavily wooded area. and^^ 2-2* Water Supply. 2-2.1* Arrangements shall be made to provide water y for fire protection by creating or using a static source. / well water, or a supply from an established pumping system. 2-2.2* If the water supply for fire protection is a pond or stream, an approach to the water's edge shall be cleared to provide access for pumping units. This pumper location or landing shall be within ten feet of the water level, with adequate clearance for fire apparatus to turn around. Permanent signs shall be posted to indicate these emergency water sources around the property. 2-2.3 For homes and cottages, pipe supply trains shall be at least 1-in. (2.54-cm) diameter. 2-2.4* When tracts or subdivisions are developed where recreational vehicles, mobile homes, or numerous struc tures might be built, a water system for the entire development shall be provided. Water storage facilities, distribution lines, and fire hydrants of sufficient capacity shall be installed with provision for standby pumping. (5ee Chapter 2, SFPA 24, Standard for Outside ProteC' tion.) 2-2.5 Lodges, hotels, motels and other similar mi- itiple- occupancy buildings in forested areas shall be protected by automatic sprinkler systems meeting requirements of NFPA 13. 2-3 Access Roads or Areas. 2-3.1 If fire apparatus is expected to respond to the home, cottage or camp area, a good roadway shall be maintained. This roadway shall be at least 15 ft (4.6 m) wide with tree branches and brush trimmed along the road to facilitate vehicle movement and to minimize the danger of injury to persons riding on trucks. Curves, grades, and bridges shall be designed to accommodate the fire apparatus which may respond. 2-4* Alarms. 2-4.1* The local fire chief, fire warden, or forest ranger shall notify occupants of buildings in forest areas of the most elfeciive means of reporting a fire. Telephone loca tions and other means for sending alarms shall be posted and adequately identified. 2-4,2* In a community of dwellings, cottages, camp sites, recreational vehicles, or mobile homes, there shall be an audible fire signal to alert property owners and other forest visitors when fire occurs. At the same time the signal shall be transmitted to the nearest fire depart ment or forest fire agency responsible for protecting that area. Chapter 3 Structures 3-1* Building and Fire Safety Codes. 3-1.1* Buildings constructed in forest areas shall meet fire protection and structural requirements of the local, county, regional or state agency that has jurisdiction in the area. (In the absence of specific fire safety re quirements, NFPA 101^, Life Safety Code®, may be used .IS a guide for life safety features in buildings.) 3-1.2 Cottage and camp buildings shall be constructed with cli ranee of at least 4 in. (10.2 cm) hetwwn wood joists and the ground to provide adequate ventilation. 3-1.3 If the building has a basement or cellar, sufficient headroom shall be provided for safe installation of heating equipment. 3-2 Structural Requirements. 3-2.1* Firestopping shall be installed between studs of all combustible wall and concealed ceiling spaces. 3-2.2 Insulation used in wall, floor and ceiling areas shall comply with ASTM C739. 3-2.3 Access shall be provided to the attic and to space beneath the building. 3-3 Exits. 3-3.1 Every cottage or resort used as a dwelling shall have means of egress that meet requirements of NFPA 101, Life Safety Code. Section 5. 3-3.2* Exterior and interior doors in cottages, resort buildings, and other structures in forest areas shall be de signed and constructed to permit quick escape. Where practical, they shall swing in the direction of exit travel. Screen and storm doors, particularlv must be arranged for this purpose. Locks and latches shall be of the type that can be released quickly and easily by the building oc cupants. 3-3.2.1 All closet door latches shall be such that children can open the doors from inside the closet. 3-S.2.2 All bathroom door locks shall be designed to permit the opening of the locked door from the outside in an emergency without the use of a special key. 224-6 HOMES AND CAMPS IN FQWEST AREAS 3-S.3 All stairways shall comply at least with the mini mum requirements for Class B stairs in existing buildings, as described in NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, that is. the stairway shall be at least 36-in. (91.4-cm) wide, with max imum height of risers being 8 in. (20.3 cm) and minimum ividth of tread 9 in. (23 cm). 3-3.4 Every sleeping room, unless it has two doors pro viding separate ways of escape, or has a door leading di rectly to the outside of the building, shall have at least one exterior window which can be opened from the inside without the use of tools to provide a clear opening of not less than 22 in. (56 cm) in least dimension and 5 square ft (1.5 m*) in area. The bottom sill shall not be more than 4 h (1.2 m) above the floor. 3-3.5* No stove or combustion heater shall be located directly under, or immediately at the foot of. stairs or otherwise block escape in case of malfunctioning of the stove or heater. 3-3.6* When awning or hopper type windows are used, they shall be hinged or otherwise arranged to allow side brackets to drop and permit the full opening to be used for escape. Where quick-opening devices are provided, they shall be the type easily opened from the inside for emergency egress. 3-3.7 These exit requirements apply to all occupied areas, particularly bedrooms and basement recreation rooms. 3-4* Interior Finish. 3-4.1* Interior finish shall be of the type described in Section 6-2. NFPA 101, Life Safety Code. “ 3-5* Roof Coverings. 3-5.1 Roof coverings shall be noncombustible or classified as Class C or better as a result of tests and listings by a testing laboratory. 3-6 Spark Arrescers. 3-6.1 Chimneys of homes and cottages in areas particu larly susceptible to ignition from chimney sparks shall be equipped with spark arresten that meet the requirements of NFPA 211, Chimneys, Fireplaces, and Vents. Essen tially, the standard requires the following; 3-6.1.1 The net free area of the arrester shall be not less than four times the net free area of the outlet of the chimney flue it serves. 3-6.1.2 Arresters shall have a vertical height of not less than 1.3 times the minimum diameter of the chimney flue or the minimum horizontal dimension of rectangular chimney flue. 3-6.1.3 Arresters, including bolts, rivets, screws, and supporting members, shall be made of stainless steel (ASTM A16/, Type 316, or ASTM A478, Type 316, or the equivalent). 3-6.1.4* Openinn shall not permit the passage of spheres having a mameier larger than Vi in. (1.27 cm) nor block the passage of spheres having a diameter of less than % in. (0.95 cm). 3-6.1.5 Means shall be provided for securely attaching the spark arresters to chimneys to provide adequate sup port and prevent movement of the arrester. Chapter 4 Electrical Equipment 4-1 Insullation and Safety Precautions. 4-1.1* All electrical installatioiu shall be made in con formance with NFPA 70, National Electrical Code^, and NFPA 70A, Electrical Code for One- and Two-Family Dwellings, in the United States, and shall be made in con formance with the Canadian Electrical Code in Canada. 4-1.2 Fuses and circuit breakers shall provide protec tion so the current is shut off when circuits are overloaded or there is a short circuit. 4-1.3 Electrical circuits and equipment, where required to be grounded, shall be grounded according to re quirements of Article 250 of NFPA 70, National EleC' trical Code. 4-1.4* Electrical ecuipment (fixtures, receptacles, etc.) installed outdoors sh» 11 be of a type approved for outdoor conditions. 4-1.5* Electrical power tools, used indoors or outdoors, shall be grounded unless protected by a system of double insulation or its ec^uivalent. Where double iruulation is employed, the equipment shall be distinctively marked. 4-1.6 The electrical service drop conductors between service pole (transformer) and weatherhead at the building shall be installed with proper clearances from the ground as required by Article 230. NFPA 70, Na tional Electrical Code. Care shall be taken to remove any obstructions, such as tree limbs or branches. 4-2 Radio and Television Equipment. 4-2.1 All radio and television equipment shall be in stalled according to the requirements of Article 810, Chapter 8 of NFPA 70. National Electrical Code, and NFPA 78. Ughtning Protection Code. 4-3 Lightning Protection. 4-3.1* For safety against lightning, all metal structures shall be grounded including masts and poles supporting antenna members. If the building has an approved light ning protection system, metallic masts, where installed outside the building, shall be bonded properly to the lightning protection system, with standard lightning con ductors or the equivalent. Lead-in conductors shall be protected by approved lightning arresters. Antennas shall not be installed where they can fall against power lines or. HEATING AND COOKING EQUIPMENT 224-7 on large buildings, hamper or fall on fire fighters who may have to respond to a fire in the building. Chapter 5 Heating and Cooking Equipment 5-1 Chimneys and Flues. 5-1.1* Stoves and furnaces shall be installed in accor dance with requirements of NFP *!1, Standard for Chimneys, Fireplaces, and Vents. 5-1.2 Any wood construction used in the building shall not hft in contact with the chimney and shall be kept a minirnum of 2 in. (5.1 cm) away. Clearance to heat pro ducing appliances shall be as specified in NFPA 89M, Heat Producing Appliance Clearances. 5-1.3* Chimnev* shall extend at least 3 ft (0.9 m) above the highest point where they pass through the roof of the building and at least 2 ft (0.6 m) higher than any portion of a building within 10 ft (3.05 m). 5-1.4 Fireplaces shall be constructed of solid masonry or reinforced concrete or be an approved freestanding design. If a lining of fire brick at least 2 in. (5.1 cm) thick or other appropriate lining is used, the total thickness of back and sides shall be 8 in. (20.3 cm). If such lining is not provided, the thickness of back and sides shall be not less than 12 in. (30 cm). 5-1.4.1* A noncombustible heanh shall extend a mini mum of 20 in. (50.8 cm) from the flue or fireplace to pro tect flooring and rugs. 5-2 Equipment Burning Solid Fuel. 5-2.1 Wood and coal stoves shall rest on a firm base with 36-in. (91.4-cm) clearance from unprotected com bustible walb and ceiling. 5-2.1.1 Noncombustible floor covering approved by the authority having jurisdiction shall be used to catch falling sparks under wood stoves equipped with legs on com bustible floors: extend thu covering at least 6 in. (15.2 cm) beyond all sides of stove and 12 in. (30.5 cm) in front. {For definition of "noncombustible" refer to NFPA 97M, Standard Glossary of Terms Relating to Chimneys, Vents and Heat-Producing Appliances.) 5-2.2 An insulator shall cover exposed combustible walb or partitions where clearances mentioned in 5-2.1 cannot be obtained. The insulating material shall be in accordance with Table 2-2.1 of NFPA 89M. Clearances for Heat Producing AbbUances. A 1-in. (2.54-cm) air space shall be provided oetween thb protective covering and the wall, using noncombustibie spacen. 5-2.3 Locate woodboxes at least 3 ft (0.9 m) from a wood-burning stove. 5-2.4 Deposit ashes in covered metal containers only, storing outdoors until safe disposal can be made. 5-2.4.1 To dbpose of ashes, dump them only when thoroughly wetted in a pit dug in mineral soil where all vegetative hazard has been cleared away for 10 ft (3 m). 5-2.5 Do not use kerosene or other flammable liquids for starting or accelerating fires. 5-3 Outdoor Barbecues. 5-3.1* The area used for barbecues in forest land shall be cleared to mineral <nil in a circle at least 5 ft (1.5 m) diameter and the barbecue stand shall be placed in the center on a firm, level spot. A supply of water and a shovel or rake shall be kept nearby for control of any small fire that may start in nearby forest duff or litter. 5-3.1.1 Gasoline shall not be used for starting barbecue fires. 5-3.1.2 Electrical charcoal igniters shall be of the ap proved type. 5-4 Equipment Burning Fuel Oil. 5-4.1* All equipment which bums fuel oil for cooking or supplying heat to a room or building shall be installed in accordance with NFPA 31. Installation of Oil Burning Equipment. Only appliances and equipment which have been tested and listed by a nationally recognized testing laboratory shall be used and their use shall be restricted to their designated purposes. 5-4.1.1 All fuel oil shall be stored and handled in con formance with the provisions of NFPA 31. Installation of Oil Burning Equipment. 5-4.1.2 Other combustible and flammable liquids shall be stored and handled in conformance with the provi sions of NFPA 30. Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code. 5-5 Equipment Burning Gas. 5-5.1* All equipment that bums gas shall be installed and maintaini^ in accordance with NFPA 54. National Fuel Gas Code. 5-5.2* Liouefied petroleum gas containers and installa tions shall be installed and maintained in accordance with NFPA 58. Storage and Handling of Liquefied Petro leum Cases. 5-5.2.1 Locate liquefied petroleum gas containers and first stage regulating equipment outside of buildings. All containers shall be secured against falling. 5-S.2.2 For domestic use. containers should be set on a firm foundation, aboveground. The outlet piping should be protected against breakage from settling by a flexible connection or special fitting. The containers are required to have safety devices specified by Department of Transportation regulations. 5-6 Open Flame-Type Equipment. 5-6.1* When used indoors, open flame-type equipment shall be positioned firmly on a steady support table or 224-8 HOMES AND CAMPS IN FOREST AREAS holder and kepi ai least 18 in. (45.7 cm) from combusti ble materials, including walls and ceiling. 5-6.2 Flammable liquids or liquefied gases for such equipment shall be stored and used according to 5-4.1.2 and 5-5.2 of this standard. 5-6.3* Wick-buming lanterns and candles shall be shielded by glass chimneys or equivalent protection. 5-7* Storage of Combustibles and Flammables. 5-7.1* Each home, camp or other occupied structure in forest areas shall have a separate storage area for flam mable and combustible fuels and materials that are in ex cess of quantities needed for immediate use in the oc cupied areas. Safe practices of storage, dispensing of fuels, and disposal of unnecessary materials shall be per formed. Chapter 6 Public Camp Sites Appendix A Thu Appendix u not part of Ihu SFPA Standard 224 but u included for information purposes only. A-1-1 The National Fire Codes and other publications of the National Fire Protection Association are applicable to the construction and safeguarding of forest properties and should be followed for detailed fire control and fire safety information. Check with local authorities regard ing building codes. A-2'1.2 If a home or cottage is on a brush- or wood- covered slope, a larger space cleared of hazardous growth for 200 to 400 ft (61 to 122 m) or more may be needed. Not all green vegetation is hazardous and some vegeta- , tion may help to control growth of more hazardous weeds and brush. Fire can spread rapidly uphill and the poten tial threat to the building depends upon the type and density of the vegetation, as well as the steepness of the slope. When property lines interfere with recommended spacing and clearances, local authorities should be con sulted. Consult a local forester for advice on clearances and desirable or hazardous species. 6-1 Fire Protection Obligations. 6-1.1 If they provide public camp sites, owners and managers shall: Restrict camping to prepared camp grounds where fireplaces or stoves are provided, or to sites designated by lana owners, forest or park officials. 6-1.2 Keep the camp free of fire hazards at'all times during the period of use. Inspect camp sites on a schedule basis. 6-1.3 Make personal contacts with users advising them of precautions necessary to prevent fires. Employ fire prevention educational measures such as posters, camp fire talks, demonstrations, or movies in camping areas. 6-1.4* Use fire-retardant materials in tents and struc tures in accordance with Chapter 3 of this standard. 6-1.5 Provide a cache of fire fighting equipment as recommended in NFPA 295, Wildfire Control by Volun teer Fire Departments. 6-1.6 Comply with local fire control regulations such as camping, travel and smoking bans, or closures during high-hazard periods. 6-1.7 Provide alarm and communications facilities suf ficient for the notification of camp site residents. 6-1.8 Provide communications facilities to the local fire department and forestry agency responsible for the area. The telephone numbers of both agencies shall be conspic uous at every telephone. Figure A-2-1.2 Provide hazard clearance of at least iOO ft (30.5 m) around a home or camp. A-2-2 When planning the water supply for an in dividual cottage or for a group of building, give con sideration to the use of water for fire protection as well as for domestic purposes. Even before construction Is started, a dependable water supply should be available for fire fighting. (See NFPA 1231, Water Supplies for Suburban and Rural Fire Fighting, Chapter 4.) A-2-2.1 Where terrain is suitable, an elevated tank or reservoir provides the most reliabfe water supply; In some instances the supply can be maintained by gravity filling. Other arrangements for a dependable water supply in clude provision of a tank having a minimum capacity of 2,500 gallons (9.475 kL), a reservoir formetl by partially damming a nearby stream, or a simple pit bulldozed in a suitable location. Adequate water levels in tanks or pits may be maintained naturally by springs, surface runoff or ground water, but in many situations artificial filling: may be required. Lining the pit with a plastic sheet wil minimize water loss through the soil. ^ • APPENDIX A 224-9 A-2-2.2 Install garden hose outlets on the exterior of buildings to permit hose stream protection for all sides of the building and the roof. It is desirable to have some outlets at least 50 ft (15.3 m) from the building for fire fighting use. Where practical, hose should be racked near and kept permanently connected to at least one outside outlet. Drain the hose during freezing weather. A-2-2.4 Because power supplies for electrically operated pumps might not be completely reliable, con sider an alternative method of pumping water, such as a portable pump. All pumps should provide sufficient pressure and voiume to deliver an effective stream of water to the highest part of the roof. Do not attach power lines that supply energy to pumps to the house or other structures. Where engine-driven pumps are used as standby units only, start the engine at least weekly to assure reliable response in an emergency. Pumps should be drained after use to prevent damage. Where piped water supplies are not available keep several full back pack pump cans or similar units in convenient locations. A>2>4 On Federal, State and Provincial forest prop erties, instructions for sounding alarms should be posted prominently. It is particularly important that every occu pant of a home or camp in a forested area be thoroughly familiar with actions to be taken in a fire emergency, the name and location of the nearest fire warden, and means of notification. Camp occupants should be able to give accurate directions to forestry or fire department person nel on how to locate the camp property. Directions should be posted next to the telephone so visitors can read them before or at the time of a fire emergency. A-2-4.1 In a community of dwellings, cottages, or camp sites, a signal to alert other property owners immediately on discovery of a fire is essential. A distinctive signal (siren, air horn, or bell) should be centrally available for this purpose. This does not replace the need to notify the nearest organized fire department or forest agency im mediately by telephone or other alarm methods. A-2-4.2 A variety of fire detectors are available for homes, cottages, resort buildings and other structures. These can sound an alarm inside and outside a building and may be connected to a telephone or other circuit for notifying the nearest forest agency or fire department. Fire detectors should be tested and listed by a testing laboratory. (5ee NFPA 74, Household Fire Warning Equipment.) A-S-1 National and regional building codes will be helpful to persons who want to build new structures in forested areas. In addition, a number of NFPA codes and standards concerning fire protection a^c available for use in constructing such properties including the following; NFPA SO. Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code NFPA 31, Installation of Oil Bumirxg Equipment NFPA 54. National Fuel Cos Code NFPA 58, Liquefied Petroleum Cases, Storage and Handling NFPA 70. National Electrical Code NFPA 101, Lift Safety Code A-3-1.1 If the building rests on supports with an open space beneath, screen all such open spaces or areas under floors to prevent the accumulation of leaves, litter and other materials subject to fire. Do not store combustibles in these spaces. Maintain at least 4 in. (10.2 cm) between wood and the ground to provide adequate ventilation and prevent rotting of the wood which could result in a fire hazardous condition. If the building has a basement or cellar, provide suffi cient headroom lof tiie safe installation of heating equip ment. Noncombustit le or fire-resistant matenals are recommended for ceilings and walls near healing equip ment to minimize the possibility of fire spread. Screen roof and gable vents to prevent sparks from entering the building A-3-2.1 Install firestopping in the studding of all com bustible wall and concealed ceiling spaces to prevent the unhampered spread of fire in such areas. Firestopping consists of using wooden blocks, or noncombustible material supported on metal strips to block all openings or passages in walls and floors tightly to prevent the passage of smoke and hot gases. This may be done at moderate cost in new buildings. In old buildings it may be costly and impractical to provide complete firesiop- ping. Blocking, however, should at least be installed at the walls between the first floor joists. Build a trap door or scuttle hole and provide a ladder for access to attic spaces Provide a door or other means of access to the space beneath the building. A-3-3.2 Locking devices should not be used which would impede or prohibit escape from fire, such as chain type bolts, limited opening sliding type locks and burglar locks which cannot be easily disengaged by quick- releasing catches. A-3-3.5 Every family should practice fire exit drills in homes or camps. The procedures are sinmie and easy to learn but become very important in a fire emergency. {See NFPA folder G-lOO, “Seconds Count Escape Plan ner. ’•) A-3-3.6 Windows may serve as a means of escape, par ticularly where ladders can be raised by fire fighters or others. Even where the location is not favorable for escape, the window opening may provide air for breathing in a smoke-filled building where occupants are waiting vor rescue. A-S-4 Combustible materials used on the interior of the building may be treated with a fire-retardant coating or impregnation to improve the fire resistance of such materials. To be adequate, such treatment must have a degree of permanency and be applied properly to pro duce the required resistance to fire. {See NFPA 703, Eire- Retardant Treatments of Building Materials.) • A-3-4.1 Interior wood surfaces can be given added pro* tection against rapid flame spread by treatment with a fire-retardant coating. Some types of dry wall construc tion are conducive to flash fires. Materials included in this category are untreated combustible fiberboard and certain types of plywood and paperboard that delaminate 224-10 HOMES AND CAMPS IN FOREST AREAS under fire exposure. Noncombustible type of finish materials (e.g.. metal lath and plaster, gypsum board and cement asbestos board, etc.) are satisfactory for in terior finish. Plywoods which delaminate under heat or moisture are undesirable. Plywoods with component plies glued with phenolic resins are recommended. A-3-5 Clean gutters and the roof of needles and leaf ac cumulations. " A-3-6.1.4 The “mesh” of woven wire is the number of openings in 1 in. (2.54 cm) measured from the center of a wire to a point 1 in. <2.54 cm) distant. The mesh of ex panded metal is the smaller of two dimensions of the dia mond shaped openings. A-4-1.1 Electrical installation for dwelling should be inspected and approved by an authority having jurisdic tion, such as an electrical inspector. Here are some thinn to check to assure that electrical installations are com(Heted properly. ^ “ (a) Make certain that fuses or circuit breakers of the i correct capacity are used for the electrical circuits. If the fuse or circuit breaker is of the incorrect capacity, then electrical overload of the circuit may cause overheating of the wiring and breakdown of the insulation, with fire resulting. • (b) All wiring should be fastened securely to rccep- tades and fixtures. Frayed or loosely connected wiring ^ can result in arcing and shock hazard. (c) Fuse and circuit breaker panelboards should be located in a dry area so that the danger from moisture will be minimized. All metal enclosures and other noncurrent-carrying metal parts should be effectively grounded. ___(d) Modem approved cables with a mounding wire or metallic enclosure properly grounded during installation should be used. Only grounding-type outlets should be installed on such circuits. Figure A-4-l.l(a) Don’t do thiil Make lure there arc enough electriatl outlets to serve all appliances without overloading. (e) Since a great deal of the older-t^e electrical cir cuits without a grounding wire are still in use. particular attention must be given to other methods of properly grounding modern electrical appliances on such circuits, such as by clamping a grounding wir to a metal ground ed cold water pipe. (f) Service drops between the service pole and the weather-head are a source of fire ignition and installa tions must be made carefully to minimize the danger. All splices and connections in the service drop wire between the service pole (transformer) and weather-head must be made with proper connectors. Generally, this type of in stallation is made by power utility companies. (g) A drop cord or lamp holder is built to carry safely only the current demanded by a lamp bulb and will , overheat when used for appliances drawing more current. (h) Discard appliances that do not bear the label of a recognized testing laboratory. The label or listing should be for the entire appliance or other assembly and not just for the cord alone. A-4-1.4 Outdoor electrical leceptacles are protected against weather by weatherproof covers. Always be careful to have dry hands and to be standing in a dry area when inserting or removing a connection from a live elec trical circuit. A-4-1.5 Electrical circuits, tools and appliances arc grounded ;o minimize shock hazard. This is particularly important when persons are using powor tools outdoors and may be standing on wet grass, soil, or r-her moist surface. Make certain that the tool or appliance is grounded properly or double insulated. (a) Never allow curtains, draperies and similar fiam- mable or combustible fabrics, plastics, or paper products close to electric lamp bulbs. (b) Restrict extension cords to their proper use; such cords should not be run through wal's, windows or doors or under carpets or be used for permanent wiring. (c) Replace frayed, worn or spliced or taped cords im mediately. Repairing of cords may result in additional hazards. (d) Disconnect all appliances such as toasters, portable space heaters, coffee pots, or hair driers and pressing irons when not in use. (e) Extensions to permanent wiring often create serious electrical fire hazards because of improper joints and splices and the use of lamp cord as extension material. (0 When certain parts of electrical equipment or ap pliances are found to be wearing out. or about to break down, examine the entire appliance carefully for other possible faults. A-4-3.1 In areas where lightning occurs frequently, in stall lightning arresters for the main electrical service. Dwellings and cottages exposed in open areas where thunderstorm activity is frequent should be protected by a properly installed and maintained lightning rod system in accordance with NFPA 78, Lightning Protection Code, Section 21. A-5-1.1 Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., Chicago. Il linois, publishes listings of patented chimneys. APPENDIX B 224-11 A-5-1.3 Periodically, flues and tmneys should be checked for accumulations of soo and creosote and cleaned when dangerous amounts arc noted. (The period will vary, depending upon the fuel used and the fre quency of usage.) There is a hazard of creosote buildup in stove pipes and chimneys because of residue frorn con trolled draft wood-burning stoves. Dampen and chimney connectors should be kept in good repair. {See NFPA 212, Chimneys, Fireplaces and Vents, Chapter 5.) A-5-I.4.1 Fireplace openings should be equipped with small-mesh screens, or transparent fire-r«istive panels to cover the full width of the opening. Extinguish fireplace fires before leaving the premises. ^-5-S.l The use of outdoor barbecues is continuing to increase rapidly, and portable and stationary barbecues cause many serious fires. Such cooking devices should be used in accordance with fire permit requirements of the local fire chief, forest fire warden, or other responsible authority. Barbecues should not be used in times of severe fire weather. Ashes and unbumed material from barbe cues should be confined and disposed of in the same man ner as ashes from stoves. Use only approved barbecue fire starters and use with caution. Many people have been seriously injured when "speeding up" a barbecue with _^,^latile liquid fuels. Do not use barbecues inside. A-5.4.1 Special care should be taken in the placing of kerosene stoves and heaters to avoid contact with com bustible materials, including draperies, to avoid acciden tal overturning, and to avoid blocking of exit routes in event of malfunction. Fabrics must not be placed on stoves for drying. Portable pressurized liquid fuel camp stoves should be filled, pumped up and started outside. Store and handle all flammable liquids in conformance with the provisions of NFPA 30, Flammable and Com bustible Liquids Code and NFPA 31. Installation of Oil Burning Equipment. A-5- 5.1 Liquefied petroleum gas. sometimes referred to as "bottled gas." is stored under pressure in containers for domestic use. A strong odorant is added to this gas and to natural gas so that leakage will be noticed promptly. LPG is heavier than air and can flow into low places. A-5-5.2 Installation and servicing should be done by a qualified installer. General safety precautions for gas in stallations include the following: (a) When work is to be performed on any gas installa tion or piping, the gas must be turned off to eliminate hazard of leakage. All appliance valvei should be closed before gas b again tumra on. (b) When checking for leakage, soap and water, or other material acceptable for the purpose shall be used. Matches, candies, flame or other sources of imiiion should never be used in locating gas leakan. Flasnlights should be used when searching for gas leakage. Electric switches should not be operated because they produce a spark; if electric lights are already turned on when the search b being made, t^ey should not be turned off. In other words, ii there is uny possibility of gas leakage in the room or area, every precaution must be taken to avoid in troducing a source of ignition. (c) Call the gas installer or gas service company whenever gas burning equipment does not function prop erly, or whenever there b evidence of gas leakage. A-5-6.1 rro»:H»* hanging lamps or lanterns with catches or locks i», O'-event them from being accidentally knocked from their hooks. Above any hanging lantern or lamp, place a metal shield with a minimum of 1 -in. (2.5-cm) air space between the shield and any combustible ceiling. A-5-6.3 Provide glass chimneys for all open flame-type lamps, including candles. A-5-7 Storage of Combustibles and Flammables. A-5-7.1 Clean and fill open flame-type pressurized lamps outdoors during daylight hours. (a) Keep attics, cellars, garages, woo^heds and the prembes in general clear of accumulations of cast-off items and rubbbh. (' A clean house seldom bums.") (b) Store gasoline in approved safety-type containers only. All dispensing of gasoline shall be done outdoors. (c) Certain oils (vegetable and animal oils) are subject to spontaneous heating in contact with combustibles. Oil- soaked and paint rags, waste, or paper should not be al lowed to accumulate. Temporary storage should be in a separate metal container, with tight-fitting cover. (d) All cans containing combustibles should be clearly labeled as to the correct content. (e) Use safety matches in preference to the "strike anywhere" type of match. (0 Store matches out of reach of children and in pro tective containers. vg) Do not hang or place clothes or other fabrics close to heating appliances to dry. A-6-1.4 Many tent materiaU are highly flammable. When purchasing or making tentage or repair thereto, select materials that have met the requirements of Federal specifications for flame-resistant textiles. {See NFPA 701, Standard Methods of Fire Tests for Flame- Resistant Textiles and Films.) When weatherproofing tentage, use only flame-resistant material. Appendix B General Fire Protection This Appendix is not part of this NFPA Standard 224 but it iruluded for information purposes only. B-1 Removal of Vegeutive Hazards. B-1.1 Remove selected hazardous vegetative material. 100 ft (30.5 m) or more if possible, from all structures, outside fireplaces and incinerators. Lawns, gardens .'•.nd green shrubs can be planted in this area to prevent ero sion and to preserve ground moisture and humus for larger trees. Ornamental shrubs that are close-pruned can accumulate heavy concentrations and dead, diy vegetation inside the green perimeter. A flare-up of this accumulation can ignite overhanging caves. 224-12 HOMES AND CAMPS IN FOREST AREAS NOT THIS it THIS ESBB Figure B-1.1 Clear brush from all slopes surrounding buildings. B-1.2 Trim tree limbs and boughs back 10 ft (3.05 m) from all chimney outlets, outside fireplaces, and in cinerators. B-1 .2.! Where crown fires are possible, thin and prune trees surrounding the structure to lessen danger of a fire crowning: in the event of a fire, this will decrease the amount of heat. Check with the local forester for ad.l..c on desirable species and treatment. B'1.2.2 Maintain a minimum clearance of 2 ft (0.6 m) between the electrical service drop wire and tree limbs ’ and branches. / B-1.3 Keep structures and chimneys free of vines and other close-CTowing v^etation that will become dry and Vh^azardous during periods of drought. B-1.3.1 Remove mosj, leaves and other flammable material from the roof. B-2 Rubbish Disposal and Incineratoriu B-2.1 Seek advice of a local fire authority regarding the proper removal and disposal of brush and other vegeta tion. B-2.2 uon t pe cumulate. Rubbish shoul regulations. larm amounts of rubbish to ac- >uld be disposed according to local B-2.2.1 Rubbish containing reflective material, i.e., glass, broken automobile headlights, etc., should be shielded from direct sunlight. B-2.3 Inspect spark arresters on incinerators regularly to make sure they are not clogged or burned out. ^^leareo ^^AW rea /CJ t.-V--* Figure B-S Obtain permit to burn brush and then clear adequate area around pile to avoid fire spread. / B-3 Before doing any burning outdoors obtain a permit if required by local fire authority. Follow the instructions as to clearance, time and necessary tools to have available. (See NFPA 82, Standard on Incinerators, Waste and Linen Handling Systems and Equipm< Chapters 2 and S.) Air pollution authorities may also re quire a permit. Do not burn during windy or dry weather. Burn brush in small Quantities. Large piles, when ignited, increase chance of fire escape. Have fire fighting equipment on hand and never leave the fire un attended. After the brush b burned, patrol the area con stantly until you are certain that the fire is out. ' B-4 Fundamental Fire Fighting Equipment. B-4.1 Where water hose outlets are available, have suf ficient garden hose or other types of hose to reach any part of the structure from garden hose outlets and equip the hose with an adjustable nozzle; 100 ft (30.5 m) of hose is the desired minimum and should be racked near or ^ kept connected to at least one outside outlet. B-4.2 Keep a substantial ladder readily accessible. It should be of sufficient length to reach the loof ridge. B-4.3 Certain tools and equipment are necessary for ex tinguishment of fires. Consult your local forestry agent for the kind most suitable for your locality and keep such items available for prompt use. B-4.4 Many protection agencies will provide a special container with emergency fire fighting tools for a remote community. Check with your local authority to sec if this service is available. Volunteer to provide the necessary custody for the equipment. B-5 Poruble Fire Excingubhers. B-5.1 Portable fire extingubhers are good emergency fire fighting equipment when used properly on the type and size of fire for which they are designed. Use only those extinguishers which have passed the tests of na tionally recognized laboratories. (For detailed information on portable fire ex tingubhers. see NFPA 10, Portable Fire Extinguisuers.) Questions about size, number, or kinds of extinguishers should be directed to the local fire chief, fire marshal, or forest fire warden. B-5.1.1 For fires involving trash, paper, cloth, wood or other ordinary combustibles, use a pressurized water, pump tank, loaded stream, or multi-purpose ex- tingubher. B-5.1.2 For fires in flammable liquids such as gasoline, oil. grease, tar and paint, use a carbon dioxide, dry chemical Halon. loaded stream, or foam extinguisher. For fires in electrical equipment such as lamps, switchboard, use a nonconduct- B-5.1.3 motors, fuse panels and switchboart ing extinguishing agent such as carbon dioxide. Halon. or dry chemical. Qo not use soda acid, foam or other water-type extinguishers until the electric power has been shut off. APPENDIX C 224-13 B-6 Evacuation Plans and Routes. B-6.1 Persons who reside in camps, cottages, resorts, trailers, and other buildings in forest areas should have at least two ways of escape to a safe location. Communities located in forested areas with limited means of escape should be constantly alert to the danger that regular routes of travel may be cut off by a forest fire. This danger may exist for a single building, a group of cot tages. or a well-established community. Even though the means of exit may be not affected, adjacent fires can move in quickly, necessitating very rapid partial or com plete evacuation of the location. B<6.1.1 To assure a safe and orderly evacuation, de tailed plans prepared well in advance are necessary. B^. 1.2 Formulation of the plan is essentially a commun ity effort including alternate escape routes. B-6.1.3 The organization heading the project might consist of a chairperson or director, under whose direc tion would be several committees, each responsible for such items as communications, transportation, accom modation and supply, medical and police work. B-6.1.4 Plans would be developed for each of the above topics with complete details of the actions to be taken in an emergency. B-7 Forest Land Users. B-7.1 When required, register with proper forest or fire official upon entering forested areas. B-7.1.1 Secure campfire permits where required. B-7.1.2 Get acquainted with the local fire authority and find out how to get in touch with him quickly in case of fire trouble. I - B-7.1.3 Extinguish all open fires upon retiring or before leaving a camp site. B-7.2 Equip vehicles with fire fighting tools as required ^by state or local law. B-7.2.1 Equip internal combustion engines with spark arresters if required by state law. B-7.3 Be familiar with and observe regulations on smoking and campfire building — sit down to smoke and extinguish smoking materials before leaving the area. I'' B-7.3.1 Be an alert, good "housekeeper" in the woods. Practice fire prevention at all timesi B-7.3.2 Do not discharge fireworks in forested areas; they are a fire hazard and generally prohibited. B-7.4 Occupants should conform to fire safety regula tions for dwellings with respect to clearance of hazardous material, use of flammable liquids and gases, installation of approved types of fire extinguishers, and early warning devices. B-8 Reporting Fires or Violations. Upon entering a forested area, learn how and where to report fires. If one is discovered, report it immediately. Careless campers are a cause of fires in forested areas. Fires result in great loss to recreation areas, valuable timber and watershed lands. It u therefore of the utmost imponance that campen recognize and appreciate their responsibility in preventing fires. B-8.1 Making Camp. Use a prepared camp site, preferably where fireplaces or stoves are provided and vegetative hazard has been cleared away. Where it is permissible to prepare a camp site, follow these rules: B-8.1.1 Before building an open fire, scrape away all flammable material down to mineral soil for at least five feet on all sides. Don’t confuse duff (decayed vegetable matter) with mineral soil — duff is combustible. Line with rock. Dig a small pit and keep the fire small. Never . logs, stumps or near brush. B-6.1.2 build it against trees B-8.1.3 Be sure pipe ashes, cigars or cigarette stubs are "dead out," then dispose of them in ash trays, mineral soil or water. B-8.1.4 Select an area near a source of water, if possi ble. B-8.2 Leaving Camp. Never leave camp until your fire is "dead out." Saturate ashes and coals with water, stir thoroughly until ashes are cold to the touch. If you do not have sufficient water, stir or chop mineral soil into ashes and coab. Con tinue thb until coab are "dead out." Check by feeling them with bare hands. Appendix C Bibliography This Apptndix it not part of this NfPA Standard 224 but is included for information purposes only. 01 NFPASundards. The following publications con tain detailed reference material supplementing the infor mation in this pamphlet. (a) NFPA 1-1975, Fire Prevention Code (b) NFPA 10-1975, Standard for Portable Fire Ex tinguishers (c) NFPA 13-1977, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems (d) NFPA 24-1977, Standard for Outside Protection (e) NFPA 30-1977, Flammable and Combustible Liq uid Code BI& ISLAND VETERANS CAMP H a'tc.U lb, n?7 Vic"* Iff. f /Adjust TevNt ' I ' I L^c,a^f’\ovi A pp v*\A.')‘C To Te. a\a r.v*Pt'cvsU T^lle TYP ICA L campsite 4 CITY OF ORONO city of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2459_________ Bn 5439422 u A RESOLUTIOH GRAHTING A CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT PER KDHICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.31r SUBDIVISION 3 (C) PILE #1277 WHERBASf Edward S. Morrow, Chairman of the Board of Governors, Big Island Veterans Camp (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located on Big Island per Orono classification Record Lot 1 within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally descrioed as follows; Government Lot One (1), Section Fourteen (14), Township One Hundred Seventeen (117), Range Twenty-Three (23); and Government Lot Two (2), Section Twenty-Three (23), and that part of Government Lot Three (3), Section Twenty-three (23), commencing at the Northeast corner of said Government Lot Three (3), Section Twenty-Three (23); thence Southwesterly along the lake shore to the Northeast corner of Lot A, Morse Island Park; Thence South 350 feet to Lake Minnetonka; Thence East along the shore of Lake Minnetonka to the East line of said^Lot Three (3); thence North.to the place of beginning (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Day Use Recreation area for the property at a maximum 240 user level per day per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.31, Subdivision 3 (C). Minnesota; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1277. 2. The property is located in the RS, Seasonal Recreational Zoning District, requiring a minimum of 5 acres in area. The property consists of approximately 57 acres in area. 3. On June 6, 1988, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the application rs proposed and recommended approval, based on the following findings; A) The 57+ acres site is large enough to support the day use recreation area without any adverse effect upon the lake or upon the adjacent wetlands that are located within the subject property. Page 1 of 6 CITY OP ORONO City of OROIN'O RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2459 B) The proposed use will have no negative impact upon the neighboring adjacent property owners. C) Based on the level of use, the fire protection system developed by staff and applicant will provide the extra precautions necessary to maintain the public safety and welfare. D) The use of the facility at a 240 user level will well satisfy the ratio recommended by this ordinance for day use recreation at a 20 user per 1 acre ratio. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that granting a Conditional Use Permit to allow the reopening of the property to a day use recreation area will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intont and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONrtnsioNS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above ' Indings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit p“%r Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.31, Subdivision 3 (C) to permit a Day Use Recreation area for the Board of Governors, Big Island Veterans Camp, Record Lot 1, subject to the following conditions; 1. Prior to opening the day use recreation area to the public, the Orono staff must inspect the facility to insure the following required improvements have been completed; A) All debris, trees, and tree trimmings to be disposed of as approved by the Orono staff, either by removal, bury, burned, or stored in an approved area for removal when ice is in. B) All 11 remaining buildings must be secured as directed by the Orono building inspections department. The caretaker cabin must be completed for legal occupancy. C) All designated fire stations must be completely installed. D) Toilet facilities (Peanut Pow and South Hill facilities) in an approved condition for public use. E) Fencing installed along top of enbankment at South Hill (Point Charming). F) Ground cover maintenance completed. Page 2 of 6 CITY OF ORONG City of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO 2459______ G) Trespass/private property signage installed, this should also include the signage for the rules of operation of the facility that is to be installed at the dock area. H) Security lighting to be inspected by staff prior to opening. I) The area for helipad use should be staked out and kept clear. Applicant should provide a written statement regarding emergency procedures to be followed in cases of emergency. J) Submit a copy of the current liability policy/coverage for the Big Island Veterans Camp operation. 2. The approval of the day use recreation area has been based on a site plan submitted by the applicant. This final site plan has been included as page 6 of this resolution. 3. Non-combustible (i.e. crushed rock) ground cover is required 4* in width around the fire rings and the charcoal grill areas. 4. Fire station ground area must be kept clear of weed coverage, chains instead of wires to be used for holding the triangle and appropriate signage defining the triangle for alarm use only. 5. Signage plans (Exhibit C, Council packets 6/27/88 meeting) have been approved except for camp sign by dock that is 8' by 8' must be reduced to no greater signage area than 50 s.f. 6- Approval of the joint use dock licence by the LMCD for a dock to be installed at the day use recreation area providing an increase in boat units. 7. Applicant must apply for the legal combination of the three separate parcels that make up the 57 acre facility 8. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owner, but are permissive only and must be exercised within one year of the date of Council approval or the special conditions of this Resolution will expire on that date (June 27, 1989). 9. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and condi tions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 10. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of the Board of Governors, Big Island Veterans Camp their heirs, successors and Page 3 of 6 CITY OF ORONO City of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2459 assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the ..chalif.o^f^title of the property. by the Orono City Council on this 27th day of June, 1988. Clerk PropertyTowperCsT Page 4 of 6 ©ID^i APR - 61989 CJWr/Na 5 T6 R A r- t TATIfl / • ^ /^ _ » PIC N IC ,e«AT Bt.ACM/W ?7Rt 7s^ Hiiiii ililliili? ■iliiiiipi iiii /\ S8S8S888888S8&%‘^mmm tew.,;;:-: ' 'w- Hiiii|iliii;site:*is SS*S s ®k S5!5 s &^^^liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii: •:vX'X*x<W>x^^^ • ^ To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator^ Date: March 16, 1989 Subject: #1386 Clifford Otten, Outlot A Ringerswood - Rezoning - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances - Section 10.10 - Applicant seeks rezoning of RR-IB zoned property to B- 1 Retail, Sales, Business District. The property is located within the Highway 12 corridor proposed for changes in land use a result of the Comprehensive Plan amendment. Section 10.40 - B-1 Retail, Sales, Business District. Applicant's sketch plan has been based on standards set forth in B-1 zoning district and in some instances has proposed even more restrictive setback standards. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Area 5 Exhibit F - Soils Map Exhibit G - Page 65 of Hennepin Soils Classification Listing Exhibit H - Proposed Special Rezoning Requirements for Hwy 12 Corridor Exhibit I - Proposed B-6 Zone for Hwy 12 Corridor Exhibit J - Sketch Plan of Garden Center Review of Current Application - Mr. Otten has faithfully participated throughout the Comprehensive Plan amendment discussions and formal meetings in addition to the proposed zoning amendment meetings held by the planner with the Planning Commission. Mr. Otten has held a contingency purchase agreement for Outlot A with the current owner, Mr. Ringer, i.or over 3 years and he feels it imperative that he proceed with a formal application. Staff has advised that the B-1 is the most compatible zoning of the existing commercial districts for his use. In comparing the standards of the proposed B-6 with B-1, the B-1 standards are more restrictive. Staff should add that Mr. Otten has also been present at Mr. Rebers' current land use review and feels that his proposal is consistent with the recent Comprehensive Plan amendment and accepts the more restrictive standards of the current B-1 zoning, .pa Zoning File #1386 March 16, 1989 Page 2 of 5 Issues for Consideration - 1.Comparison of standards. existing B-l zoning standards Comparison of Structural Setbacks B-l B-6 *2 Front 35'30* *3 Rear 35'30' Side 15'10' *3 Side (street)35'30' *1 B-l has special yard requirements for landscaping; Front 20' Rear 30' Side 15' adjacent to "R" Side 10' adjacent to street Commercial use adjacent to "R" district requires fencing or evergreen hedge (50% opaque, 6 feet high) along rear and side lot lines. No special yard requirements for B-6 district - standard does require that 25% of land a’-ea be landscaped with grass - 3% of land area of parking lot must be landscaped. 35' if adjacent to "R" Comparison of Parking Setbacks B-l B-6 Front 20'15' Rear 3' *1 10' Side 3' *1 5' *1 Side (street)20' **10' *2 10' adjacent to "R" district *2 15* adjacent to "R" district 20' adjacent to "R" district Same as front yard setback Comparison of Building Design and Construction B-l B-H As set forth in Section 10.40, No standards Subdivision 6 (G) Zoning File #1386 March 16, 1989 Page 3 of 5 Are B-1 standards adequate? Are the standards compatible or inconsistent with the intent of the Highway 12 Comprehensive Plan amendment? How do they relate specifically to Area 5? (Do members see areas for concern?) 2. "B-l Requires Municipal Services," B-1 zoning cannot be effective until property is approved for sewer service. Based on Appendix E, the commercial structure will require a fire suppressive system. Outlet A of Ringerswood is not within the current boundaries of the Orono/Long Lake water district. Additional water service and water units would have to be approved by the City of Long Lake. The Rebers property has been denied sewer by Long Lake from their existing lines in Brown Road. The City of Orono will provide sewer from the west (Orono sewer lines). The Otten property would be included in this. Section 10.40, Subdivision 1 - Purpose of B-1 district states only that the district shall have immediate access to highways and public sanitary sewer. There is no mention of the requirement for municipal water. If water becomes a major issue, it may have to be provided by on site well. 3. "Conceptual development plan reflects a proposed subdivision of two lots." It is not clear if applicant proposes to divide the garden center lot prior to development. If this is the case, applicant should be advised to file the appropriate subdivision application with the commercial site plan. The formal filing of these land use applications depends upon Council’s final resolve of the rezoning to B-1. Does Planning Commission have any objections concerning this oroposed scheduling for the comprehensive review of Otten's proposal. 4. "Review of the purpose of the B-1 zone and the permitted uses." The B-1 retail sales business is intended to provide a district for businesses that supply commodities or perform a service primarily for residences in the surrounding neighborhood, suggesting a neighborhood- type business. Mr. Otten's garden center or level of use does not suggest a neighborhood garden supply shop, the immediate neighborhood and could reach out to possibly a 10 mile radius. The area certainly is adjacent to residential districts and other business districts which under a PUD format, would have more restrictive controls. Does the proposed use fit with the permitted uses cited in Subdivision 3 (A)? Is an amendment needed, and if so would it be appropriate in consideration of the purpose cf this retail district? Review Exhibit H that lists the special rezoning requirements for the Highway 12 corridor. Item E which designates available zoning districts within the corridor. Note that existing B districts have been excluded because of their limited scope (service to immediate neighborhood). Is this a planning concern? All other existing commercial districts "B" have the same limited, immediate neighborhood service area. Zoning File #1386 March 16, 1989 Page 4 of 5 5. "Area 5 - Recommended alternative." In consideration of the recommended alternative for Area 5, Lots A and B remain in single family ownership and use and are not proposed for multiple family development. The sketch plan provided by the applicant reflects landscape buffering along the south side of Dickey Lake Drive. What is the required buffering along the west side of Lot A and the southern borders of Lots A and B where the road abutts the properties? B-1 zoning requires an evergreen hedge or privacy fencing. 6. Preliminary review comments of sketch plan submitted with rezoning application. A. Need to address retention/drainage on site. Review Exhibits D, F & G, although the section in the Comprehensive Plan that deals with Area 5 suggests no wetlands area, the survey reveals a designated wetland within the outlot. The soils map classifies it as a Shields silty clay loam, similar to the cordova shown to the north and east. This issue must be addressed prior to the submittal of a formal site plan. Drainage from the site all flows to Long Lake and historically this area has many drainage problems. Retention on the site will be a major issue. B. Buffering. How do we provide buffering for the residential, single family lots to the east, specifically Lots A and B? Evergreen plantings within southern boundaries of Lots A and B, similar to plantings required of Rebers on private property of adjacent neighbors? Realign road so that there is additional room for landscape buffering? C. The east/west access road has been placed meeting the safety guidelines for separation of intersections both from Highway 12 and existing Dickey Lake Drive. The access road at the east side of the property has been located to the north to realign with the proposed outlot in the Rebers' plat. A future subdivision should show the alignment with the future road outlot in the Rebers* subdivision. A new curb cut at Highw .y 12 would have to be reviewed and approved by MnDot. All access off Willow Drive must be limited to east/west road. No additional curb cuts will be allowed to the site off Willow Drive. Zoning File #1386 March 16, 1989 Page 5 of 5 Based on Planning Commission's responses and findings to issues noted above and other issues raised during the discussion, the following options of action are available. 1, Denial finding the proposed use not compatible with the purpose of the B-1 zoning district and the use not consistent v h permitted uses of the B-1 zoning district. The use meets the . enc of the Comprehensive Plan amendment for Highway 12 and is recommended thot applicant amend proposal to PUD zoning upon the City Council's final adoption of the PUD ordinance for Highway 12 within the next month. 3. 2. Conditional approval of the B-1 rezoning based on the following findings : A. The City has adopted no formal moritorium to limit development proposals at this time. B. The Comprehensive Plan amendment for the Highway 12 corridor has approved commercial use of this property. C. The proposed B-1 rezoning is the closest fit to the garden center use. This approval is conditioned upon the following: A. To delay formal rezoning to B-1 until the PUD ordinance is adopted. The City to agree to accept the amendment of the original rezoning application to PUD. B. Upon conceptual approval of rezoning by the City Council, applicant is to file a formal subdivision application and commercial site plan. C. Approval of sewer service for the property. Approval of B-1 rezoning as proposed and direct applicant to file a formal subdivision application and commercial site plan with the City upon formal approval by the Council of the rezoning. Zoning File #1386 Additional Conrcnts and Planning Commission Recommendation - April 6, 1989 Page 6 of 9 Additional List of Exhibits - Exhibit K - Comprehensive Plan Section Exhibit L - Existing Zoning Map Exhibit M - PUD Ordinance Exhibit N - Planning Commission Minutes of 3/20/89 Council is advised to review the Planning Commission minutes of March 20, 1989 for more background on the discussion and the issues raised by both the applicant and Planning Commission members. The main thrust of the Planning Commission’s concern was that the principal intent of the Comprehensive Plan amendment would not be satisfied if we were to allow this property to be developed under a limited neighborhood type commercial zoning district (review Exhibit K). Members felt that it was unfortunate that the PRD ordinance had not been adopted as of this date, but clearly this was not an acceptable reason to forsake the intent of the Comprehensive Plan amendment. Planning Commission hoped that there was a vehicle available to the applicant that would provide him the opportunity to file a formal application. In discussion surrounding the B-1 zoning district, the Planning Commission reviewed their concern over the lack of control of future uses. The current proposal regarding a garden center use was most acceptable. Their concern was 20 years into the future if the B-1 zoning district was approved, this would mean no ability to review any new use that was listed as a permitted use. Some of the uses listed under the B 1 would not be acceptable to the Planning Commission. Applicant should also be advised that B-1 zoning uses are not permitted uses within the B-6 zone. Applicant noted at the meeting that what did it matter if B-1 or B-6 zoning was approved for the site since B-1 uses were listed as approved uses under the B-6 zoning. Please review Exhibit I, the B-6 zoning district standards. Five specific uses have been listed as permitted uses. It was the Planning Commission’s intent that any use outside of these uses would have to come under a PUD rezoning. Standards set forth under the B-6 zoning with a 2 acre minimum lot area are appropriate for the five uses set forth under the permitted uses. This is why the uses under the B-1 would not be »jpropriate. The very nature of the applicant ’s multiple use under a garden center classification suggests also a need for a PUD type ot development. Zoning File #1386 April 6, 1989 Page 7 of 9 Staff is getting redundant, but remember there is greater flexibility for the applicant in site planning for a limited site. This site has definite limitations. The depth is nan w; there is a wetland located within the center of the property, and the property is a corner lot located on Highway 12 and a potential county road. Once again, all future use of the property is controlled under the development agreement required for all uses within a PUD district. Any other new use or major change in curent use would require new review by the City. The PUD for this property would approve a garden center use exclusively. Any other additional uses would have to come before the City under a formal application. A PUD form of development was deemed even more appropriate during the Planning Commission review because of the makeup of the ownership of the properties within the Highway 12 corridor. There appears to be a total of 5 to 6 specific ownerships of large acred parcels of the undeveloped lands included within the scope of the Comprehensive Plan amendment. The majority of the Planning Commission denied Mr. Otten’s petition to rezone to B-1 finding the B-1 zoning lacked the necessary controls over future development and to be in complete conflict with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan amend ment. The one denial vote approved the B-1 zoning because of the positive aspect of the proposed use and of the long delays sustained by Mr. Otten. Planning Commission encouraged Mr. Otten to file a subdivision and commercial site plan application and to await a PUD ordinance. In consideration of the land use application options of the applicant, staff would note that it would be to applicant's advantage to await the approval of a PUD ordinance amendment because the rezoning, subdivision, and the commercial site plan review can be completed under one application. The exii’ting ordinances require first approval of a rezoning application that cou .d take approximately 2 months for finalization, then a separate subdivision that can take anywhere from 3 to 4 months, then upon completion of the subdivision application, applicant would then be allowed to file a commercial site plan review. Under the proposed PUD ordinance, the comprehensive application could be completed within 3 review phases. The tot" review could be completed in approximately 3 to 4 months. The existing code would require a total of 7 to 8 months. Zoning File #1386 April 6, 1989 Page 8 of 9 Staff can proceed to work with the applicant on the preparation of the general concept stage under the PUD zoning (providing even a credit against the rezoning fee from Application #1386). The PD rezoning fee has not been listed in the fee ordinance of the Cityr but will be as soon as the ordinance is adopted. Subdivision and commercial site plan fees are already established. The following issues must be resolved before Mr. Otten can present a comprehensive PD rezoning application: 1. The City to resolve MnDot's request for additional right-of-way for Highway 12 safety improvements and impact on proposal, 2. Impact, if any, on property as a result of County Road 116 extension to Highway 12. 3. Extent of area needed for future semaphore at Willow Drive and Highway 12 intersection and impact on site. 4. Need for new controlled access off of Highway 12 - temporary vs, permanent. 5. Resolve of wetland classification and current boundaries (Conservation & Flowage Easement exists over wetlands). 6. Prepare preliminary grading and drainage plans for application with M.C.W.D. and review by City Engineer. 7. Define portion of east/west road to be completed as part of development of most western lot of the proposed division, 8. Final resoJve of location of east/west road as it intersects the Otten property. 9. City to determine need for municipal water to site. 10. Schedule for sewering of property - currently under consideration for Rebers' property. 11. City to determine need for additional curb cuts on Willow Drive - applicant's concept proposal shows a separate curb cut from east/west access road. Zoning File #1386 April 6, 1989 Page 9 of 9 Options of Action Available to Council - 1. Denial of B-1 rezoning application of Cliff Otten based on the following findings: A) Rezoning application is in complete conflict with intent of Comprehensive Plan amendment for Highway 12. B) The use is a mixed use requiring special zoning consideration and would be more appropriately considered under PUD zoning. If formal denial action is taken by the Council, staff must be advised to draft the appropriate resolution for formal action at your April 24, 1989 meeting. 2. Advise applicant to formally withdrawn current rezoning application and direct staff to credit any fees that have not been expended for this review against a new PUD application, and further direct applicant to work with staff to resolve issues noted above prior to the filing of a general concept stage of a PUD application. Council may wish to advise applicant of their intentions regarding the B-6/PUD ordinance presented for your review and action at this meeting. 3. To approve B~1 zoning application based on findings raised by applicant. CITY OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address Ringerawood Outlet ^ o4i Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 34-118-23-22-0013 Please check one - Property abstract or torrens? (for Conditional Ose Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Phone (home) Clifford Otten Phone (work) 473-3425 P.O. Box 249 Address 22o5 W. Wayzata Blvd City Long Lake Zip 55356 OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Judd and Mary L. Ringer Phone (home)____ Pho; e 473-7123 Address 4q5 Willow Dr. South Date Property Acquired 7/8/63 City Orono Zip 55356 (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PEES - CONDITIONAL DSE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current. Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee _ _ _ _ $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use _ _ _ _ $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) _ _ _ _ $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg _ _ _ _ $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 f) Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore FI<D/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS _ _ _ _ $150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _ _ _ _ $250.00 Vacation _ _ _ _ $150.00 Easement Vacation _ _ _ _ $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision X $250.00 Rezoning _ _ _ _ $100.00 Appeals _ _ _ _ Other - see fee schedule PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property R-2 Residential Other (specify) Agriculture DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail:Reuuest rezoning from R-2 to R-1 for Commercial use by Qtten Bros Nursery & Landscaping, Inc. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 6. Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). 7. Flat Map. 8. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature_________________________________ Date________________ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true' and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date 2/24/89 OWNERS SIGNATURE . . ^ ^The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this reqtfest. y///// DateOwner's signature Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. Otten Bros. NURSERY LANDSCAPING, INC. March 16, 1989 Jeanne A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Ms. Mabusth, In conjunction with our proposed application for re-zoning to B-1 of the Ringerswood Outlet A property, we hereby request public sanitary sewer in.accordance with Sec 10.40, Subd.l of B-1 Retail Sales Business District. S incers^y, Robert D. LaFavor Vice President RDL:ng OVER 30 YEARS OF QUALITY SERVICE RUN DATE 02/16/8f BATCH 0d6 38 33>118-2S 11 0003 PROP AOUi*' 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO OItJER NAME OROMO PLAZA TAXPAYER REIERSGORO LAM FIRM NAME/ADDR A9<»5 HALIFAX AVE S SUITE 7 EDINA 55424 HEhtlEPIN COUMFY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OKtlERS LIST (D 38 34-118-23 21 0001 02060 HAYZATA BLVO HAZEL P MYERS REBERS CONST INC 3525 HEBSTER AVE MPLS Ft4 55416 r\ REPORT NO. P1435401 PAGE 15 38 34-116-23 21 0002 02160 HAYZATA BLVO HILLIAM H HEAR t HIFE MINISTERS LIFE/INV DEPT 3100 H LAKE ST MPLS FM 55416 PROP ADOR OFt^ER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADOR OFMER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADOR OFtJER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 34-118-23 22 0003 00720 DICKEY LAKE DR J REIS JR I K Z REIS JOSEPH < KATHLEEN REIS 720 DICKEY LAKE OR LONG LAKE FM 55356 38 34-116-23 22 0007 00735 DICKEY LAKE OR P 0 SK006 t S L SKOOG PAUL t SHERRY SKOOG 735 DICKEY LAKE DR LOFIG LAKE FM 55356 38 34-118-23 22 0010 00765 DICKEY LAKE DR INSILCO CORP INSILCO CORP C/O HINFIELO HOMES DIV P 0 BOX 42106 PLYMOUTH Ftl 55442 0) (5) 38 34-118-23 22 0005 00701 DICKEY LAKE OR JOHN H GULLICKSON C0F4STR INC JOHN H GULLICKSON CONSTR INC P 0 BOX 164 HAMEL FH 55340 rr») 38 34-118-23 22 0008 00745 DICKEY LAKE OR M « P BAUMER MARVIN L BAUMER 745 DICKEY LAKE DR S LONG LAKE FW 55356 © 38 34-118-23 22 0011 OOVIO DICKEY LAKE DR J A ( H J GATES JR JOEL HALVAHFE 7374 H LAKE OF ISLES BLVO MPLS FW 55405 38 34-116-23 22 0006 00725 DICKEY LAKE OR BAD MCKAY BARRY C 6 OAMARIS H FCKAY 725 DICKEY LAKE OR L0F4G LAKE Ft4 55356 38 34-118-23 22 0009 00755 DICKEY LAKE DR T 6 ESAU t M A ESAU TEhr.«NCE G 1 MARY A ESAU 755 DICKEY LAKE OR LONG LAKE FtF 55356 38 34-118-23 22 0012 02251 PINE RIDGE LA CLIFFORD L OTTEN CLIFFORD L OTTEN BOX 249 LONG LAKE Ftl 55356 &)CD 00 CO 38 34-118-23 22 001^' PROP ADOR 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGFIEO OFtlER NAME C t H RINGER TAXPAYER CHARLES J S MARY L RINGER FIAME/AOOR 405 HILLOH OR S LONG LAKE Ftl 55356 38 34-118-23 24 0001 02120 HAYZATA BLVO HILLIAM HEAR ETAL HILLIAM N HEAR 36 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE Ftl 55356 72 33-118-25 14 0013 00585 HILLOH OR LARTCH DEVELOPMENT CO ROBERT 0 ERICKSON 2470 CEDAR POIFIT RD HAYZATA Ftl 55391 PROP ADOR OFtlER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 72 33-118-23 14 0014 00565 HILLOH DR LARTCH DEVELOPMENT CO ROBERT 0 ERICKSON 2470 CEDAR POINT RD HAYZATA Ftl 55391 (D 72 34-118-23 23 0001 02399 HAYZATA BLVO H GE0R6AYN C KRAMER GEORGAYN C KRAMER 1488 COPELAND ROAD ilAPLE PLAIN Ftl 55359 & 72 34-118-23 23 0002 02365 HAYZATA BLVO N LONG LAKE ENGINE REBUILDERS ROBERT E HAUGEN 8329 OAKVIEH CT MAPLE GROVE Ftl 55369 pj; RUN Date 02/16/S9 BATCH OOA*71 34 118-2S 23 0003PROP ADDR 02345 HAYZATA OLVO H OKIER NAME LONG LAKE ENGINE REBUILOERS TAXPAYER ROBERT E HAUGEN NAME/AOOR 8329 OAKVIEH CT HAPLE GROVE HN 55369 HErt^EPlN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWERS LISTo72 34>lI8-23 23 000802205 HAYZATA BLVO H PERRY’S VENTURES INC PERRY’S VENTURES INC 2205 H HAYZATA BLVO LONG LAKE ^t4 55356 REPORT NO. P1435401 PAGE 1672 34-118-23 23 002102265 HAYZATA BLVO N CLIFFORD L OTTEN CLIFFORD L OTTEN 2265 H HAYZATA BLVO LONG LAKE Ml 55356 PROP ADDR OtlER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR PROP ADOR OMIER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 72 34-118-23 23 0022 02265 HAYZATA BLVO H CLIFFORD L OTTEN CLIFFORD L OTTEN 2265 H HAYZATA BLVO LONG LAKE m 55356 72 34-118-23 25 0045 02325 HAYZATA BLVO H RICHARD R RUUD ET AL ELITE AUTO X RICHARD RU03, 2325 H HAYZATA BLVO LONG LAKE Ml 55356 o 72 34-118-23 23 0023 02225 HAYZATA BLVO H PERRY’S VENTURES ^^C PERRY’S VENTURES INC 2205 H HAYZATA BLVO LONG LAKE Ml 55356 pO? 72 34-118-23 24 0048 02073 HAYZATA BLVO H GREGORY M SHAUGHNESSY LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR 2073 H HAYZATA BLVO P O BOX 697 LONG LAKE Ml 55356 ■•jS 72 34-118-L3 23 0044 00572 TAMARACK AVE 6E0RGAYN C KRAMER GEORGAYN C KRAMER 1488 COPELAND ROAD MAPLE PLAIN Ml 55559 TOTAL BATCH CO GO CO006 00026 f I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEMIEPIN COUNTY OEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEOGE AND BELIEF. OAT!Si LaxA^ e ‘ . 11 parcel of 13 acres represents the n»,«iPtion - This small parcel ------------------- 1 e. effectively because of its4. /difficult to develop effecti j property most difficult ^,i,ting Ringerswood .... . E). The shape and size of this p other areas (see PP stallation of a frontage road in aces present a problem for the installation this area. area tf“5 b ve are very limited for thisAlternatives as indicated above are ;.i7t7v;t'::n7:-^::^^ development as found in other area in the corridor. 2 Commercial/Mt^i/5lHiii£iS_I^ii£S ' - - --- - nf Willow Drive and in ... no....... . 13 antic p ^ f , multi-residential nature, of the frontage road would e o . B) which 2 n of two residential lots (A & B) whi The possible inclusion allow for were not originally included in the study wou appropriate buffering between the multi-residential an single family development in Ringers Wood. ■■■ Primary Frontage Road • ••• Alternate Frontage Road Area 5 Recommended Alternative -Fig. 33 The recommended alternative in Figure "^3 would include transition of commercial on the south side of the frontage road back to mu 11i-residentia 1 on the north, with appropriate buffering from the single family to the north. The frontage road, regardless of configuration, would commence opposite the frontage road west of Willow Drive and tie into the frontage road coming from North Brown Road. Given the intensity of development, this area would be sewered either through the Long along Willow Drive, or possibly through branches of the Long Lake system. rtctcristic abrupt lower boundary. Tonguing of into the B horizon is expressed by very dark-gray and gray coatings on faces of peds. ^mre of the B2 horizon is silty clay or clay. '.V^ntent in the finest textured layer ranges 45 to 60 percent. Sand content is less than 10 *?ent and is typically less than 5 percent. Tex- ^of the C horizon is variable, ranging from clay *^iilty clay loam, silt loam, or loam. In places ^ the C horizon is heavy silty clay loam or it texminatcs at a depth of less than 72 '^es and conmonly less than 54 inches. Silty ^Btnts do not occur in all areas, but where they -occur, they are up to 4 feet in thickness. Loamy cosanonly occurs within a depth of 10 feet. The Vhorizon is medium acid to neutral. The B horizon j neutral to strongly acid, and the C horizon is n^iy to Strongly calcareous . As mpped in Hennepin County, these soils are jrker in color in the upper part of the B horizon -ija the defined range for the Shields series. This ifference, however, does not alter their usefulness behavior. , j » Shields soils have a thinner, lifter colored A •^2on than the associated Minnetonka soils. They ^ higher in clay content and lower in sand content ‘jun similar Dundas soils. Shields silty clav loam (Sh .--This nearly level oil occupies flats and shallow drainageways . Areas n mostly 2 to 5 acres ir size, but a few tracts up to IS acres in size. Included in mapping wer^ small areas of Dalbo ;oils on slight rises and a few imall areas of clay- rf soils in depressions. This soil needs drainage to be productive. Be- :ause water is removed slowly bv tile drains, tiles med to be closely spaced to be «><^tective. If prop- ?rly drained and managed, this soil moderately •ell suited tc crops grown in the ccunty. An occa- ional sod crop helps tile drains to remive excess •Iter more rapidly. (Capability unit IIw-:; wood- ond group 6; building site group 11) Shorewood Series The Shorewood series consists of deep, moderately •ell drained soils that formed in calcareous clayey iiments 2 to 5 feet thick over calcareous loamy 11. In many places a 1-foot to 3-foot layer of 4ty sediment occurs between the clay and the loamy :i. These are nearly level to gently sloping ’.Is in smooth, convex positions on hills and oils. Slopes are mostly simple. The native fetation was mixed hardwoods. Shorewood soils are iociated mainly with Hayden and Erin soils. In a representative profile, the surface layer is »ck silty clay loam about 10 inches thick. The •osoil is about 23 inches thick and consists of ree layers. The upper part is very dark grayish - own silty clay; the middle part is olive-brown Ity clay, and the lower part is light olive-brown Ity clay. The imderlying material is light olive- “Wwn clay loam. Shorewood soils have high available -noisture ca pacity, moderately slow permeability, and medium to slow internal drainage. The ’-vater table in the more nearly level areas is at a depth of 3 to 5 feet during wet periods. The root zone is deep, but plant roots develop slowly in the firm, clayey sub soil. The surface layer is high in organic-matter content. Shorewood soils are very fertile, but crops grown on them respond well to additional fertilizer. Representative profile of Shorewood silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, in a cultivated field, 240 feet east and 320 feet north of the southwest comer, SEl/4 SEl/4 SWl/4 sec. 28, T. 117 N., R. 23 W.: Ap--0 to 10 inches, black (lOYR 2/1) silty clay loaz.; strong, very fine, subangular blocky structure; friable; neutral; clear, smooth boundary . B1--10 to IS inches, very dark grayish-brown (2.5Y 3/2) silty clay; strong, fine, subangular blocky structure; firm; few pores; common, patchy, grainy coatings on ped faces; medium acid; clear, smooth boundary. B2t--18 to 30 inches, olive-brown (2.SY 4/4) silty clay; strong, medium, suban^lar blocky and angular blocky structtire; firm; common pores; thick, moderately patchy, black and very dark brown clay films on ped faces; sli^tly acid; clear, smooth boundary. B3t—30 to 33 inches, light olive-brown (2.SY 5/4) silty clay; moderate, coarse, subangular blocky structure; firm; common pores; thin, patchy, black clay films on vertical ped faces; few black organic stains; neutral, clear, smooth boundary. C--33 to 60 inches, li^t olive-brown (2.5Y 5/4) clay loam; weak, fine and medium, subangular blocky structure; firm; many pores; few, fine, black, old root <±annel fillings; common, medium, prominent, yellowish-brown (lOYR 5/8) iron oxide concretions; calcareous; moderately alkaline. :he solum is 23 to 40 inches thick. The A hori zon is black, very dark brown, or very dark gray. The B2 horizon ranges from dark grayish brown to light olive brown and yellowish brown in color. Tex ture is typically silty clay that is 40 to 50 per cent clay, but clay content ranges from 35 to 60 percent. Sand content is less than 15 percent ar centers aiound 5 percent. The C horizon is grayish brown to light olive brown. Te.xture is silty clay, silty clay loam, clay loam, silt loam, or loam, depending upon thickness of the sediments. There is commonly loamy till within a depth of 7 feet. The A horizon is slightly acid to neutral, and the B hori zon is neutral to medium acid. Shorewood soils are lower in sand content and typically higher in clay content than similar Kil kenny, Le Sueur, and Lerdal soils. They have a thicker and darker colored A horizon than the asso ciated Dalbo soils . They are better drained than the associated Minnetonka soils. S2C. 10 ._SPECIAL RSQUIAZIISIITS TOR R220NIiIG IN TH2 HIGH1?TAI 12 CORRISOR STTOE AREA. A. Miniziun Araa TO insura consisrancy witi tlia goals and objecoives of tba Highway 12 Corridor Study, applications for rasonjuig witliin the study area must include a minimum of five acres. Tiie plans submitted along’ vitb tbesa applications must also include enough information regarding the affect of the prooosed development on surrounding parcels to insura that the orooertv can be developed in a manner that is both compatible with adjacent properties and consistent with the Eighway 12 Corridor Study. B. Access and Circulation Plan The plans submitted along with the application must o’-ooose access to the proposed development which is consistent with the Transportation Planning Qbiectivas o. the Hichwav 12 Corridor Study. All public easements and road right* of wav that is needed to allow the construction of seir/ice roads* and/or the expansion of Trank Hignway 12 past the subject property, shall be dedicated to the City. C- Sanitary Sewer Availability The available sanitary sewer capacity to serve the development of this corridor is currently very limited. Therefore, anv plans to develop within this area muss. either demonstrate that it can occur utilizing current sewer allocations or they must include improvements to increase the capacity of the systems ser/ing this area. If sanitary sewer system improvement ^ ^e propot«^^ of the application, then the feasibility of providing this aarvica will also be scrutinizad along with an financing plan to insura that tba oos^ b^tbaproviding this additional capacity will be paid for by tne development. D. Storm Water Management Site Drainage plans mxist be submitted to insura consistency with the storm water managemt^ objectiv^ o^ the Highway 12 Corridor Study. Plans will be carefully H raviawed ta insura acun thau prcccsad sucm vauar pending araas cenuain sufficient storage capacity and vhataver additional measuras ara necessary to guaranuae tnat the quality of runoff from the sita, meets cr excaeds the City's standards. E. Available Zoning Districts Due to the unique set of constraints and opportunities that effect future decisions regarding development within the Highway 12 Corridor Study Araa, applicants for rezoning are strongly encouraged to utilize the planned unit develocment anoroach, outlined in Sec. 10. of the Orono Zoning Ordinance. However, applications will be acceoted for razoning requests for any of the following existing zoning districts within the City, consistent with a finding of consistancy with the Highway 12 Corridor Study and subject to compliance with all of the additional requirements established in this section: HC Highway Commercial District. PRD Planned Residential Development RIA One Family Residential District RIB One Family Residential District Multiple Family Planned Residential District F.Building Design'.and Construction In addition to other restrictions of this Chapter, the use, construction, alteration or enlargements to auiy building or structure within the district shad.! meet the following standards: 1. All exterior wall finishes on any building shall be: (a) Face bricic, or (b) Natural stone, or (G) Specially designed precast concrete units if the surfaces have been integrally treated with an applied decorative materials or texture, or (d) Factory fabricated and finished metal frauaed panel construction, if the panel materials be of any of those noted in items a, b and c above, or glass. (e) Other materials as may be approved by the Council. Combinations of such materials shall be permitted. 3. All subsequent additions amd outbuildincrs constructed after the erection of an c'-'‘^ina' building or buildings shall be constructed of materials ccmcarable to those used in the or-a-fnal construction and shall be designed in a canned" conforming with the original arohitectura'» desicn and general appeeurance. No building or structure of a temoorary char act a"** trailer, basement, tent or shacJc shall be constructed, placed or maintained upon the prooerty except as accessory to and during the construction 3f permanent buildings. G. Requirement of Develoment Agreement All development permits authorized within the Highway 12 Corridor Study Area shall be subject to the execution of agreement. Said development agreement shall clearly identify the tizaing of all of the public improvements associated with the develooment and the developers' financial commitments related to these improvements. The agreement shall also include anv and all other conditions of approval deemed necessary to insure compliance with the Special Minimum Recruirements for Rezoning the Highway 12 Corridor Study Area, as well as the goals and objectives of the Highway 12 Corridor" Studv. SIC. 10.45 B-6 HIGHWAY CCHHSHCIAL DISTRICT Suhd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of tiie HC Highway Comnercial Disrricr is to provide a oommeroial district specifically tailored to accomplish the commercial development objectives of the Highway 12 Corridor Study Section of the Orono Comprehensive Plan. Subd. 2. .Application. All applicants for a building permit in any Highway Business District shall be reviewed by the Council and referred to the Planning Commission for review. Subd. 3. Permitted Uses. Within any »*3-6" Highway Business District, no structure or land shall be used except for one of the following uses or uses deemed similar by the Council. A. 3. C. D. E. Offices (business and professional). Banks and financial institutions. Libraries. Motels, and hotels. Restaurants (Class I). Subd. 4. Relationship with Chapter 10._ Planned Unit Development. Other types of commercial uses and mixed use developments may be applied for through the planned unit development process. Applications that include commercial uses within the Highway 12 Corridor shall assume the B-5 District as the underlying zoning district. Subd. 4. Conditional Use A.Within any -Highway Business District, no structure or land shall be used for one of the following uses except by conditional use permit: 1.Any business that includes a drive-thru function- Subd. 5. Accessozry Uses. Within any ”B-6 ” Highway Business District, the fallowing uses shall be permitted accessory uses: A- Any arnassory use as raguiarad in nha ”3-1” Susinass Disnricn. G-jJbd. 6. Araa, Height:, Icn Width, Senhack Requirements and Design Requirements. The foilcwing minimum requirements shall be obser^/ed subject 13 additional recruiraments and exceptions contained in Section _ of this Title. A.Lot Area two acres B.Lot Width 100 ft. C.Setback - Principal Structure Front Tard 30 (33)* Side Interior 10 (35)Sim im Side Street 30 (33)Sim Rear Yard 30 (35)Sim D.Setback - Accessory Struct-ire Front Yard 30 (35)*Sim im M Side Interior 10 (35)Sim Side Street 30 (35)S^ Rear Yard 30 (35)Sim E.Setback - Parking Front 15 (20)ft, Side Interior 5 (10)ft, Street Side 10 (IS)ft. Rear Yard 10 (10)ft. Setbacks in parentheses apply adjacent to districts. *3 0 feet or 1 1/2 times the building heicht whichever is greater. F. Drainage. No land shall be developed ond no use shall be permitted that results in water nmoff causing floods, erosion, or deposits on adjacent properties. Site and drainage plans shcill be submitted by the applicant in such detail as required by the Council and those plans shall be reviewed by the City Engineer before submission to the Plauining Commission and Council for approval. Such runoff may be required to be properly channeled into a natural water course, ponding area, storm G • H. I. J. K. =-=“er^7o^r^e«is; ius^'be in <===Pli^« Csdli^visioiTs and subject to the acorovai of ooher agencies having jurisdiction over the area a.._30-a- by the drainage. Ee^aht No struciiura or building shall excasd ?-l/2 ItZlTe's oftlirty feet in height except as proviced in Section 10.75. At least twenty five percent (25%) of the land araa shall be landscaped with g^^ss^ f" gf'^®u4rM-=snt c-ve- sh-uhber-^ and trees. Aw leas- t_ree pa__-.^w land area within a parici.ng area shali be landscaped. The following ninimua sices snail be raquired a^ w..e tine of planting: Cverstory Deciduous Traes Ornamental Traes Conifarous Trass Major Shrub Plantings 2-1/2 inches in dianetisr 1-1/2 inches in diamerar 6 fast tall 5 gallons All trash and trash handling equipment shall be ^ar^ within the principal st^cture, wx-^n an s/pssrf.. readily served through swinging doors. tre«/ quality and appearance as the principal Structure. The ground level view of all mechanical utilities shall be completely screened from properties and adjacent ?treete, or e^^ lomlatible with the architectural treatment of the principal structure. L. £:cramai loading and sar'/ica araas" nusn ca ccnoiaoaly scraaned frca tde ground level view fron contiguous residential or corrarciai prooertias and adjacant streets, excapt at acoass points. M. The light froa autcacbile headlights and other souroas shall be screened whenever it may be diractad onto adjacant residential windows. 3. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OF THE ZONING DISTRICT a) Types of Planned Unit Development - All zoning changes within the corridor will be of the Planned Unit Development nature. These will be broken down as follows: - Planned Residential Development - Single Family - 1 Unit/2 Acre - unsewered and sewered up to 1 Unit/1 Acre - sewered - Multifamily - Up to 10 units per acre depending on square footage of units. - Planned Commercial Development - Development of retail and commercial areas including consolidated retail and limited free standing sites. b) Standards Within Each Pl»\nr"d Unit District - Issues that would be addressed by the actual performance zoning standards include the following: A. Site Development Calculation - In ai >ort to attain protection of appropriate environmental assets determine the amount of the site that is developable through a resource protection calculation. B. Compatibility of Uses - A listing of uses considered compatible within the established performance zoning. C. "Aesthetics" - Standards for development of property would include: 1. Landscaping minimum requirements. 2. Lighting standa/ds. 3. Signage standards. 4. Requirements for compatibility of building materials. NOHIH SEC. 10.PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPHSirT (PUD) SECTION: 10._.A: XO._.B: 10._.C: 10._.D: 10._.E: 10._.F: 10._.G: 10. .H: Authorization Allowed Uses Required Standards Coordination With Subdivision Regulations Revisions and/or Changes Phasing emd Guarantee of Performance Control of Pl2mned Unit Development Following Completion Procedure for Processing a Planned Unit Development SECTION 10. .A AUTHORIZATION: Planned unit development authorization may allow: Subd. 1. Variety: Within a comprehensive site design concept a mixture of land uses, housing types and densities. Subd. 2. Sensitivity: Through the departure from the strict application of required setbacks, yard areas, lot sizes, minimum house sizes, minimum requirements, and other performance standards associated with traditional zoning, planned unit development can maximize the development potential of land while remaining sensitive to its u-iique and valuable natural characmerisrics. Subd. 3. Efficiency:’ The consolidation of areas for recreation and reductions in srreet lengths and other utility related expenses. Subd. 4. Density Transfer: The project density may be clustered, basing density on number of units per acre versus specific lot dimensions. Sxibd. 5. District Integration: The combination of uses which are allowed in separate zoning districts such as: A. Mixed residential allows both densities and unit types to be varied within the project. B. Mixed residential with increased d^sity ac3oiowledging the greater sensitivity of PUD^ projects, regulation provides increased density on the property if a PUD is utilized. C. Mixed land uses with the integration of compatible land uses within the project. /K SECTION 10._3 ALLOWED OSES ■ Silted. 1. Used within the PTO may include only those uses Land Use Plan'.' Specific allowed uses and performance standards for each PUD shall be dulineated in an ordnance and development plan. The PUD development plan shall identify ail the proposed land uses and those uses shall become permitted uses with the acceptance of the development plan. Any change in list of uses presented in the development plan will be considered an Mentoent to the PUD and will follow the procedures specified in Section 10._.F of this Title. SECTION 10._.c RSQUIEED STANDARDS Subd. 1. ■ The City shall consider the proposed PUD from the point of view of all standards and ptirposas of the Comprehensive Land use Plan to achieve a maximum coordination between the proposed development and ^e surrounding uses, the conservation of woodlands and wetlands, the protection of health, safety and welfar- of the community and residents of the PUD. To these ends, the City Council shall consider the buildings, compatibility, parJcing areas and other features with respect to the topography or ..xie area natural features such as streams and large t-ees, efficiency, adequacy and safety of the internal streets and driveways; the adequacy of green areas; the adequacy, location parking areas; and such other matters as find to have a material bearing upon the stated standards and objectives of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. SECTION 10._D COORDINATION WITH SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS Subd. 1. Subdivision review under the subdivision regulations shall be carried out revXw of the PUD. The plana required under tois Chapte. shall be submitted in a' fora which will satisfy toe requirements of the subdivision ordinance for the preliminary and final plat. SECTION 10._.E REVISIONS AND/OR CHANGES Subd 1. Minor changes in the location, placement and hSght ^f Sltures may be authorized by f ® Review committee if wascircumstances not foreseen at toe trae toe final pla approved and filed with the Zoning Administrator. Subd. 2. Changes in uses, significant changes in t location, size; or height of structures, any rearringi of lets, blocks and building tracts, changes in provision of conmon open spaces, and ail other chan^^es to fha approved final developnent plan nay be nade only af a public hearing conducted by the Council. Any changes shall be recorded as amendments to the recorded copy or the final development plan. Subd 3. All of the provisions of this Title applic^le to the original district within which the Planned Unit final plan. zoning district. It shall not b« necessary lor the Ciwy Council to find that the rezoning was in error. XO. .F PHASING AND GUARANTEE OF PERFORMANCE Siiibd. X. The Planning Commission shall compare the actual development accomplisned in the various PUD zones with the approved development schedule. Subd. 2. Upon recommendation of the Planning Co^ission and for good cause "shown by the property owner, the Council nay extend the limits of the development schedule. cSMon^open^ac^^'^p^li^and’^MLeational facilities which are shown on the final development plan mus.- it"construction which has taken ^ace on find that the rata of construction of dwelling units is greater than the rate at which common open spaces Md ^lic and recreational faculties have been and provided, they shall forward this information to the Council for action. Subd. 4. A performance bond or agreement. _3 = COmOL OFSECr-ON 1 •— COMPLETION suid. 1. tiiaissued, the use of the Ian buildings or structure final development plan. sold. 0. ««r “• sS jlSi below A.^^existing buUdings or of authorized by the purposes and intent Sey are consistent “autbSized by ^is Se final pl«. =^^cube of any building or B. S’Ci'iwU*. ^ Any building or f be rIconUwrtel only in substantially des~oy^ development compliance witb„'^g‘i?nal development plan is and |eSton^^_-?-approved under Secuion — C. D. plan under 4 ♦•he final development plan Any otter.^a Mnal ^tvSSmenl plaS under Section 10._.P- _ _ __ oT.aNN1devexopw®**'-««rtrr-cqTMG A PLANNED UNIT B PROCEDUKE for processing a SECTION 10.—• development sold. 1. wpii'=sJ°”^"iSSSid sr«“p;|p~2”lf„„, «;s"p5prd~““s-Msddisttdtor. ra« gj*^iSS5t diiB “ “pp;S“;;lS™i'SiS‘JS.SSi. Title b«?“''*„^S^^surveys and otter data, preparation of plans, Sufcd. 2. A. General Concept Plan to- -ntire development without incurring substantial cost. The plan shall include the following: ’ ^ 1 ' ' 1. 2. overall maiximum PUD density range. 'Genefal location of major streets and . pedestrian ways. ' 3.General location and extent of public and common open space. 4.location of residential and Mnresidential land uses with approximate type and intensities of development. 5. 6. Staging and time schedule of development, Other special criteria for development. B. Schedule: 1.Developer meats with the Zoning Administrator to discuss the proposed developments. 2.The applicant shall file the =°n<=ePt ftage apoliStion and preliminary plat, together with all supporting data. 3.Within thirty (30) days after verification by ISnSg Administrator plan and support^g data Planning Commission shall hold a publi hearing. 4.The Pl2mning Commission shall conduct 5 /tn\ davs prior to the hearing and owners of land within three hundred fif^ feet (350') of the boundary of the property ii» question. f ■ D. 5. Tha Citv may’ raquesw additional infomation from the applicant concerning operational factors or*retain expert testimony at the expense of the applicant concerning operational factors. 6, _ The Council may hold a public hearing after the receipt of the report and recommendations from the Plamning Commission. If tha Planning Commission fails to make a report within sixty (60)' days after receipt of the application, then' the City Council may proceed without the report. The Council may approve tha concept pl2in and attach such conditions as it deems ‘ reasonaUsle. Approvail shall require a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the entire Council. Development Stage: Following general concept approval, if given, the applicant shall submit the development stage application and final plat.^ The aoplication shall proceed and the acted upon in accordance with Section 10._.F for zoning district changes. If appropriate because of the limited scale of the proposal, the concept stage and development stages may proceed simultaneously. ADolications: Ten (10) copies of the following exhibits, emalysis and plans shall be submitted to the City: General Concept Stage: 1. 2. Preliminary plat and information required by sxibdivision Title. General Information: (a) (b) (c) The landowner's name and address and his interest in the subject property. The applicant's name and address if different from the lamdowner. The names and addresses of all professional consxiltants who have contributed to the development of the PUD plan being sizbmitted, including attorney, land planner, engineer and surveyor. city Bsy rs^usst additional f—om the apolicant concerning operational factors or retain expert testiaony at the Lcpense of the applicant concerning o^sira'ti.oiial ^ The Council may hold a public hearing after raceiDt of the report and recommendations Som Ih^PlaSni^ Commission. If the Plann^g g^SliSton ISls\o make a sixty tlia City Council may proceed without the SKIMS' b!SS; ,sirss-s^^*ss™u. C.St.,., £“™sf,sissiinsSt tt. s^agripSication and final plat. The SISSS ^ J|t~tSSSS'M SpSSSS. Ssi.. .< tt. n.it.d developLnt^stagefmay J'roceed'sLultaleously. □.Applications: Ten toexhibits, analysis and planb snaii oe =.v*^ the City: General Concept Stage: 1.Preliminary plat and information required by subdivision Title. 2.General Information: (a) The landowner's name and addr^s and his interest in the subject property. The names and addresses professional consultants contributed to the development PUD plan being submitted, Ittolney, land planner, engineer and surveyor. r > : * -:. Location, type and extent of tree cover. (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) Slope analysis. Location and extent of water bodies, wetlands and streams and flood plains within three hundred feet (300') of the property. Significant rock outcroppings. Existing drainage patterns. Vistas and significant views. Soil conditions as they affec.. developaent. an of the craohics should be the same ^alfa^?hf final plan to allow easy Hiss refSenca. The use of overlays is raconmended for clear reference. Scheaatic drawing of the proposed develooaent concept including ^ limited to tie general location of maior cS^atLn eleients, public and co^on opITspace, residential and other land uses. A statement of the estimated total of dwelling units ?STpOD and a tabulation aooroximate allocations of land use expressed in acres and “ ^ the total project area, whic.h shall Include at least the following. (1) Area devoted to residential uses. (2) - Area devoted to residential use by building type. (3) Area devoted to common open space. (4) Area devoted to public open space. (5) Aoproximate area devoted to streets. \ • .\ w (6) A?proxiaa-a area devoted to, and number of, off-street parking and loading spaces and related access. (7) Approximate area, and floor area, devoted, to commercial uses. (8) Approximate area, and floor area, devoted to industrial or office use. . . When the PtJD is to be constructed in stages during a period of time extending beyond a single construction season, a schedule for the development of such stages or units shall be submitted stating the approximate beginning and completion data for each such stage or unit aind the proportion of the total PUD public or common*open space and dwelling units to be provided or constructed during each such state and overall chronology of development to be followed from stage to stage. When the proposed PUD includes provisions for public or common open soace or service facilities, a statement describing the provision that is to be made for the care and maintenance of such open space or service facilities. Any restrictive covenauits that are to be recorded with respect to property included in the proposed PUD. Schematic utilities plans indicating placement of water, sanitary and storm sewers. The City may excuse an appliczmt from submitting any specific item of ^ information or document required in this stage which it finds to be unnecessary to the consideration of the specific proposal. The City may require the submission of any additional information or documentation which it may find necessary or appropriate to full consideration of the proposed PUD. 4. Mnlept stage Cor the POD. inCoraation from the general concept stage nay be incited for background and to provide a basis for tbe iSSi^ionfSill include but not be limited to: fa^ A final plat and information required by ■hha City subdivision Title. fb) Ten (10) sets of preliminary plans drawn ' to a scale of not less than one^^ equals one hundred feet (1”*100 ) sSle requested by the A^inistrator containing at least the following information): ProDOsed name of the development (which shall not duplicate nor be similar in pronunciation to the name of any plat theretofore recorded in the county where the subject property is situated) . (2) Prooerty boundary lines and ^ dimensions of the property and any significant topographical or physical featxires of the property. (3) The location, size use and ' ' arrangement including height in stories and feet and total square feet of ground area coverage and floor aria of proposed buildings, including mobile homes, and existing buildings which will _ remain, if any. (4) Location, dimensions '' ' driveways, entrances, curb cuts, ^king^stalls, load^g spaces and access aisles, circulation elements ^alhike and p«rt«strian; and the total si^e “vekge of all circulation elements. (5) (6) (7) Loca-iicn, desigr.ation and tntal araa of s--~ c=Bnon open space. Location, designation and total area prososed to be conveyed or • dedicated for public open space, including paries, playgrovpds, ' school sites and recreational facilities. . - _ proposed lots and blocks, if any and’nujabering system. The location, use and size of aWc?Srea and other land uses on adjacent properties. Detailed sketches a. ^i°ns of proposed landscapiu. General grading for the developed PUD. inforaation that may ^^e Sin Spired by the Planning Commission or Counci- m SSjliction with the approval of the general concept plan. f-inal development plan approval sought. population. A tabulation indicating the gross square ‘ ’ ^o«taae if any, of commercial and SSSIrial cleaning,activity (e.g. drug store, oiy supermarket). Sciudin, -=»u. homes • /vt. (10) (11) fVi (j) A detailed site plan, suitable for common open space, general landscaping plan, swTUC^ure, including inobila homes, and usas. - • . - Preliminary grading and site alteration olan illustrating changes to existing topography and naturul site vegetation. ^hrilS Lould clearly reflect^a site treatment and its conformance with the approved concept plan. A preliminary plat prepared in aclordance with the subdivision Ordinance. A soil erosion control plan acceptable to watershed districts, Departmen Natural Resources, Soilst^ce, or any other agency with review “toori^ clearlycontrol measures to be used during Ions??uc?ion and as permanent measures- H MIVUTBS OF THE PLAHNIH6 COMNISSIOH MEETING MARCH 20, V 9 ATTENDANCE /:00 P.M. The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Chairman Kelley; Planning Commission members Johnson and Brown; Planning Commissioner Bellows arrived at 7:15 p.m. The following represented the City staff: Building and Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron and City Recorder Scheffler. Council Representative Barbara Peterson was in attendance, and CounciImember Callahan was also present. #1384 FRITZ GULLICXSOM 99 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH VACATION OF DRAINAGE 8 UTILITT BASEMENT PUBLIC HEARING 7:00 P.M. TO 7:10 PM. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly "oted. Mr. Gullickson was present for this matter. Zoning Administrator Mabusth briefly explained that a lot line rearrangement was previously done for the purpose of redefining lot boundaries of lots in the Holly Acres Addition. The drainage and utility easements that existed along the old lot lines were not vacated at that time. Mabusth suggested that vacation of such easements be required with any future lot line rearrangements of platted property. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Johnson, to recommend approval of this application. Motion, Ayes*4, Nays^O, Motion passed. (The motion was made on this application after the Rauschendorfer matter was heard so that a quorum was present for a vote.) #1386 CLIFFORD OTTBN NORTHEAST QUADRANT AT INTERSECTION OF fflLLON ROAD S HIGHfiA/ 12 RBZ0NIN6 FROM RR-IB TO B-1 PUBLIC REARING 7:40 P.M. TO 8:30 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. Clifford v tten and Robert D. LaFavor were present for this matter. Mr. LaPavor gave a presentation as to how the site will be developed and used. It will be used for a retail garden '•enter and landscaping operation. There will be a management 3ign headquarters, installation and construction services d on, outdoor plant material storage, model garden displays, l«*isiucape supply storage and interior and exterior saleo areas. At the MIHUTBS or THT LANNIMG COMMISSION MEETING MARCT 20. 1989 H ZONING FILE #1386-OTTEN CONTINUED time the sketch plan review was done, the questions of buffering to the north and an east/west service road were discussed. Since that time, those items have been specifically addressed. An east/west service road out lot has been designated all*?wing for the setbacks required with a B-1 zoning. A retention pond has also been designated. Chairman Kelley suggested that the specifications of B-1 zoning be briefly reviewed. Mabusth informed the Planning Commission that there was an existing B-1 corridor to the east of the subject property. Should the Otten proposal be approved, it would extend that corridor. Initially it vas proposed that Lots A and B be developed with multiple-family dwellings. Since then, however, the owner of Parcels A and B, has sold the individual lots for single family residential use. Mabusth further mentioned that there is a proposed subdivision that Mr. Otten will complete in the near future. Mabus >h suggested that Pin: Ridge Lane be vacated at the time of the subdivision and that acc*-'^s be secured to Lot B. Since Locs A and 3 wilt stay in single family residential use, the commerci'\l line is now proposed to be moved up along the southern border nickey Lake Drive. Landscape buffering along that boundarv w^.s presented at the first commercial site plan review. Zoning Administrator Mabusth said that the B-1 zoning classification was not designed for the Highway 12 Corridor, as it is more compatible with limited neighborhood commercial. In comparing the B-1 zoning with the B-6, Mabusth questioned why design criteria was not established for the B-6 as it was for B- 1. She did not know why it would not be the same criteria as a PUD. Mabusth pointed out that the commercial use that exists to the east is net true B-1, it*s more of a shopping center commercial use. In Mabusth's opinion, tf , PUD vould be more appropriate for Mr, Otten's proor^al than the l-l. Mabusth suggested that the Octen appli or- be for^^arded on to the Council in order to receive concepiuai directior and some form of a commitment regarding the approve ’ ''f the PUD ordinance. Once the PUD ordinance has been appru\ -and is in place, th«3 Otten rezoning can be completed. Chairman Kelley expressed his concern ^.nvolved with the resale and a more intensified retail use of t s property in th f uture. He thought the use Mr. Otten was ideal^ fo- the location. Mabusth comfortable with the PUD PUD would require appro^ whether the rezoning of whether the subdivisi-' comm€;*nted that if the a , acres, that Mr. Otter ' .j not at all- Mr. Ott . ii. PUD, sked Kelley if e would be more •* f or this app ation since the ''^urg» usfe. She questioned <ccur as one parcel or ired at all. Bellows in as one PUD for all 13 .e *che subdivision first or he is not asking for a MIHUTBS OP THB PIAHHIHG COMMISSION MBBTIHG MARCH 20, 1989 hi ZONING ' 1.E #1386-OTTEN CONTINUBD Ch irman Kelley asked for input regarding a separate entrance off of Willow. Bellows believed that it would create too much congestion in that area. Mabusth stated that the City would not allow a separate access. Kelley asked how far the east/west road had to be from Highway 12. Mabusth said that she recollected it to be 300*. Kelley asked for input regarding an entrance/exit off of Highway 12. Brown indicated that he liked that less th^n the Willow Drive access. Nr. Otten said that the time was right to be discussing a proposed entrance/exit off of Highway 12 because of the proposed upgrading. MN DOT indicated that they would base their plans around Orono's decision for Mr. Otten's property access. Mr. Otten proposed at a minimum a right turn entrance/exit, but not a full intersection. Kelley indicated that he would not be opposed to such a plan, ^iellows did not believe that an entrance/exit off of ‘^'ghwd/ 12 would be required. Mr. Otten questioned why it would be necessary to bring people all the way through the intersection, if they could avoid it. Bellows would prefer the access to be the service road access already designated off of Willow. Mr. Otten intented that proposed road to remain as an outlot designation until such time Mr. Rebers put in his road and until the status of Lot 2 is determined. Bellows asked Mr. Otten whether he would be willing to relocate his entry. Mr. Otten agreed . Chairman Kelley read A list of the acceptable uses within a B-1 zoning. Mr. Otten pointed out that the B-6 incorporated those uses and felt t* t there was no point in waiting for the B- 6. With respect to a PUD zoning, it was Mr. Otten's understanding that it was his option whether he wanted a PUD; not that it was mandatory. Mr. Joel Walvatne, 710 Dickey Lake Drive, questioned whether adequate screening would be provided between his property and the garden center. Mr. Otten «»howed the Planning Commission pictures showing how the ^xistin 'getatlon already provides screening. Id ‘ oe opposed to additional screening if 3 W ...C is existing, his plans do not show In addition to th* vegetation, there is a g Mr. Otten's proper y from Mr. Walvatne*s. Mr. Otten said necessary, br anything add! large berm sepv. Mr. Chuck McKay, 725 Dickey Lake Drive, expressed his approval of Mr. Otten's proposal. He asked for clarifi “-^lon regarding the service road. Kelley inf canned him that it was Mr. Otten's intention not to install service road until everything to the east of the property is developed. Planning Commissioner Johnson asked whether the Initial plans showed the service road through the middle of the property? Mr. Otten explained that initially that was being proposed. However, when the required 60' of road ?-d additional setbacks from the road were taken into considera' it would have used MIHDTBS OF THB PLAHHIHG COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 20, 1989 ZONING PILE il386-OTTBN CONTINUED too much property. The next issue addressed was municipal sewer and water. Mabusth reported that the Rebers subdivision had been denied sewer connection to the existing Long Lake lines within North >-rown Road. Therefore, Orono will have to provide that connection from its lines to the west. As far as water, Mabusth said that the B-1 zoning did not require municipal water. Mr. Otten said he intended to have an on-site well, even if municipal water was available. Zoning Administrator Mabusth suggested that Mr. Otten put in writing his reasons for preferring a B-1 zoning rather than a PUD fcr the benefit of the Council. Planning Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Otten what he intended to do with Lot 2? Mr. Otten said it would be held in reserve until such time that he was confident he would not need it for the garden center. Mr. McKay stated that he was very anxious to have this resolved, as it was affecting the sale of his home. Mr. Otten had indicated to Mr. McKay that he would work with any perspective buyers with regard to screening. He urged the Planning Commission to act as quickly as possible. Planning Commissioner Johnson indicated that he would ju^jport the B-1 zoning. However, he did not concur with Lot 2 being included in the rezoning because there was no designated land use. Bellows said that she would approve the B-1. Kelley said that he approved of the project, but would prefer the PUD zoning. Brown concurred with Kelley. There were no further comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley to deny the B-1 commercial zoning for Lots 1 and 2, and recommend approval of the proposed project under the PUD zoning so the City would have the ability to approve any other use of the property. Kelley's motion failed due to a lack of a second. Planning Commissioner Brown questioned whether it would be possible to Include a clause requiring approval of another use under the B-1 zoning. Mabusth responded that once the property is rezoned B-1, the only "controls" the City would have would pertain to a comme'^cial site plan review. If the same building is used, there would be no additional review. Planning Commissioner Bellows believed uhat the Comp’^ehensive Plan should provide the necessary critejixa to allow Mr. Otten to proceed. She said that she was "distressed" that there was nothing currently in place to offer Mr. Otten in the way of zoning and this matter has been drawn out so long. MINUTES OF THE PLANNIIIG COMHISSIOH MEETING MARCH 20, 1989 SOHIHG PII.B «1386-OTTEH CONTINUED It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Brown, to deny the B-1 commercial zoning for Lots 1 and 2, and recommend approval of the proposed project under the PUD zoning so the City would have the ability to approve any other use of the property. Mabusth questioned whether Kelley wanted to encourage the City to provide Mr. Otten with the capability of proceeding with a formal application even though the B-€ and PUD zoning ordinances have not yet been passed. Kelley said that the application could be filed and the applicant could begin working on the commercial site plan as a PUD. Mabusth informed Mr. Otten that he could subdivide first. Motion, Ayes*3, Johnson, Nay due to his wish to approve the B-1 zoning and allow Mr. Otten to proceed with his project. MUNICIPAL PACILITT - SITE ANALYSIS PUBLIC HEARING 9:00 P.N. TO 9:35 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Chairman Kelley explained for the benefit of those in attendance, that the City of Orono was analyzing various sites for the location of a new city hall, maintenance facility, and police department. Mr. David Kroos of Boarman & Associates was present to advise the Planning Commission of the current status. Mr. Kroos said that a needs assessment study had been done to determine the facility needs for the police department, administration and public works facility. From that information, basic lot plan diagrams were developed and tested on each of ehe site options requested by the Council. After performing the needs assessment study, the Council determined that the existing municipal site and the sewer plant property were the two options to consider. S^te criteria evaluations were then done which assisted Boarman in determining criteria priorities. As later requested by the Planning Commission and Council, the Highway 12- Old Crystal Bay Road property was Included in the site analysis. The present facility site is zoned RR-lB. Once the setback requirements are applied, the buildability of this site would become very limited. If the site were rezoned to an R-IA, it would increase the buildable area. The present site is centrally located and is historically familiar. To Mr. Kroos knowledge, there were no problems with the soils on this site, however the well may pose a problem for a sprinkler system. Chairman Kelley asked whether the possibility of acquiring adjacent property had been explored. CounciImember Callahan explained that there would be the need to acquire an additional 13 acres in order to have all the facilities located together. Consequently, the Council eliminated this site as an option for housing all three facilities. The sewer pond site currently has the sewer pond and the Metro sewer facility. It does have a substantial amount of Clifford L. Otten 2265 W. Wayzata Blvd Long Lake, MN 55356 April 10, 1989 Orono City Council City of Orono P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Councilpersons; As you know, my application presently pending before the Orono City Council for my new garden center requests that you rezone the land from its present residential classification to business classification B- ?. The Planning Commission recommended that you approve the project under unspecified planned unit development standards so as to retain total control over the project, I told them that that was not appropriate in these circumstances. Let me explain my position. Presently, with single family residential zoning of the site, everyone appreciates that no residential use is appropriate. Therefore in all events it is generally understood that some commercial use of this land is necessary and appropriate. Therefore, as a starting point the property needs to be rezoned from its residential use category to some form of commercial use category. Such rezoning is critical such that whatever commercial improvements are made to the property can be built an rebuilt in the case of fire, other destruction, condemnation or the like, so as to meet the requirements of mortgage lenders, insurers, initial users, tenants, and future buyers, all of whom are critically interested in what can be done to the property over lengthy periods of time. Once one understands that the property must be rczoned from residential to some form of commercial, then the question arises as to what appropriate control procedures are available to the city. With regard to permitted uses, I suggest that a garden center, being such a desirable use, should be a permitted use in this commercial zone. There need to be other appropriate permitted uses within this commercial zone as well so that other uses ot the site may be made in the future for the protection of a mortgagee who might obtain title through foreclosure, an insurer who has an interest with regard to reconstruction obligations (and in that I am referring not only to my own insurer, but that Orono City Council April 10, 1989 Page 2 of any tenant of mine who might have an obligation to rebuild) and naturally a future buyer who might have a use in mind different than a garden center. Conditional uses in such a zone should then be the more problematic uses which you presently envision. By specifying that those problematic uses are subject to the conditional use permit process, you may then at the time that such use is proposed add conditions to protect city interests. By contrast, planned unit development regulations are normally reserved for custom developments in commercial zones where neither the permitted uses, nor the conditional uses with conditions, can accommodate the proposed project. Even planned unit development regulations are an overlay over specific u .derlying commercial zoning standards such that both the applicant and the city understand the underlying conditions of zoning. If such conditions cannot be complied with, only then do the custom zoning provisions of the PUD concept come into play. As a third line of defense, the city should provide PUD availability in this zone to accommodate unusual (multi-use), burdensome (too big a project), oddly configured (clustered), or other proposals. In the case of my garden center, there are no unusual, burdensome or oddly configured aspects to my plan and therefore no planned unit development concept is necessary for me and, in fairness, you are not entitled to any special restrictions. The usual zoning controls in a permitted commercial use are more than adequate. Conditional use and PUD provisions will protect you against future changed uses which are more problematic. Please remember after all that at my expense I will be installing sewer and water, paying taxes at commercial rates, and cor.plying with all of your other commercial zoning regulations. I*m not asking for a higher density of land use, a greater height of buildings, a drastic cut-back in required parking, favorable treatment with regard to neighbors, or ar** other custom factor which would give rise to fairly entitling you to impose the restrictions of a planned unit development on this project to my extreme detriment with lenders, tenants, or future buyers. I view the land, its rezoning to commerical use, and my putting it to not only a reasonable commercial use, but one quite compatible with the residential neighbors to the north, as such an advantage to the city that the city should swiftly take the Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson COUNCIL MFETING APR 101939 9 CITY OF OROHO Proa: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Dates March 14, 1989 Subjects #1387 Margaret D. Rossing, 130 Cygnet Place - After-the-Pact Variance - Public Hearing Liat of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Application Property Owners List Plat Map Pormer Deck Current Deck Septic Inventory Map Pertinent Ordinance “ Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (A) - Rear setback variance required for dec.«. attached to principal structure. Second story deck must meet the setback required for principal structure of 50*. The previous deck was constructed sometime in the early 1970*s. No record of a permit being issued. The original building plans confirm that the deck wos not shown with house plan. constr*'.ction 4/69 - R-IC) Required Setback * 50* (current RR-IB zoning) Required ** 30* (former zoning at time of house Existing Principal * 25* Pormer Deck * 14* Current Deck ® 11*4" Current Variance ■ 38*8" or 76% Pormer Variance « 36* or 72% History of the Zoning of the Property - At the time of the platting of the Swan Lake Subdivision, the minimum standard for the area was 25,000 s.f. in area with 120* required width at the building line. In April of 1969 when the house was constructed on the property, the property was zoned R-IC requiring a minimum of 1 acre, 140* of width, 35* front setback, 30* rear setback, and 10* side setbacks. The house was placed 25* from the rear lot line instead of the required 30*. All other required setbacks were satisfied. It is not clear to staff as to why an area variance would not have been required prior to the construction but there is no record of an area variance being granted. In 1975, the property was rezoned to 2 acres with the current standards of 50* front and rear and 30* side setbacks. There is no record of a building permit being issued for the former deck which was probably built sometime in the early 1970*s. Staff '*23 photographs of the crevious deck that conformed to the sketch submitted by applicant (review Exhibit E). The applicant rebuilt the deck without a building permit because she was not aware that a building permit was required. The present deck conforms pretty much to the design and extent of the former deck except that the deck along the rear of the house has been extended to the east corner. The new deck is located 11*4" from the rear lot line whereas the previous deck was located approximately 14* from the rear lot line. Zoning File #1387 March 14, 1989 Page 2 of 2 Findings and Hardships Cited by Applicant - Unusual shape of lot. 2. 3. House location on lot prior to existing zoning (principal structure met zoning standards at the time of construction in 1969}. Location of house on lot and interior floor plan restricts construction of deck on east and south side of residence structure. Options of Action Available to Planning Co*ission - 1. Denial based on the findings set forth in Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 requiring the immediate removal of structure. 2. Approval of application as submitted and advise the for the appropriate building permit so that the building confirm stlucture satisfies all pertinent standards of the building code. 3. Approval subject to current deck being altered so that there ^2 farther encroachment into the substandard setback than what «*i“ted with the previous deck at 14*. Once again, adequate information so that staff can issue the required building permit for the new construction. April 4, 1989 ^ 4.4Additional CoaMents and Planning Coamiaaion Recoaaondation - Additional Exhibit - ^ ^ i.Exhibit G - Applicant's Sketch of Former Deck The Planning Commission refused to accept the existing deck as it encroached further into a substandard rear setback. **^®*®* ^ Staff r ift a sketch drawn by the applicant of the former decK. sketch (Exhibit D) was based on the deck^as^aabove, we have no definite knowledge of dimensions of previous deck as a SSim'nrpe^it was not issued. Staff finds it o'nTssumed the Council that the present deck be trimmed back 2'8* bas^d on location of previous deck. The Planning Commission approved the ®«tback variance of the new deck based on the northeast extension trimmed back to a 14' setback. A second part of that recommendation *5 nenaltv fee. The vote was a split 2-2 vote, in iignr ot Council's previous action at their March 27, 1989 meeting, we will 0 not fine residents for work done without permits as long as there record of them ever having been in violation of the City applicant is hereby advised, based on the Council, that there will be no additional penalty fees charged for the variance application nor the building permit. A RBSOLOnON GRANTIII6 AM AFTBR-THB-FACT FARIAHCB TO MONICIPAL S0MIM6 CODE SECnOH 10.28, SUBDIVISIONS 5 (A) FILB #1387 NHBRBAS, Margaret D. Rossing (hereinafter "the applicant”) is the o%mer of the property located at 130 Cygnet Place within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Lots 1 and 2, Bloc)c 3, Swan Lake Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property")> and NHBRBAS, the applicant has applied to the City for an after-the- fact variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivisions 5 (A) to permit a deck reconstructed without the benefit of a building permit to remain that is located 11*4" from the rear lot line instead of 50* as required by the ordinance. Minnesota: HON, THBRBFORB, BB IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1387. 2. The property is located in the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring 2 acres in area. The property consists of l-t* acres and was created prior to the current zoning standards. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on March 20, 1989, and recommended approval of the after-the-fact variance based upon the following findings: A) Unusual shape of lot. B) House located on lot prior to existing zoning standards. The rear setbac! 3f the principal structure is 25* wherv«i the current code requires a 50* setback. C) Location of house on lot and interior floor plan restricts construction or deck on east and south side of residence structure . Page 1 of 4 Am The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission^ reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the after-the- fact variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the after-the-fact variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be In keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. COHCLOSIOHS, ORDER AHD COHDITIOMS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono 2ity Council hereby grants an after-the-fact variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivisions 5 (A) to permit a deck constructed without a building permit to remain at _ _ _• from the rear lot line, subject to the following conditions: 1. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (April 10, 1990). 2. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically tei*minate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of herself, her heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 2 of 4 CIT7 OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATI Initial Application Pee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATICHI 0\/LiuerSite Address I CITY OF CifCSO FI^A;iCE :f F1CE iSziCCCOOO 01 C-E>1 150. C «?.*. ,* 4wV» VChECK 7L Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) HkVEPT-rFm YOU v/ . . . . . ^l302tC cool OOi 712^1 Please check one - Property abstract or torrens?02/24/i Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICAHT Naime Phone (home ) ^7S ‘^!StU 'bS)S/A^6_____ Phone (work)________ Address; 130 Q>yfeA/£T 'P______City; LCfVCy Zip; OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ^ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address;City;Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property /A L/'^esidential _ Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail Estimated Construction Cost^_ VARIANCES REQUIRED _ _Lot Area Setback Variances (, Other Lot Width Front Side Hardcover Rear) EARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from ^rict en^f^r^^ent^fregulations; U/)U4 au .^ A:^ DBSCRIPTIOH OF OilUSUAL PROPERTY COHDITIOHS Describe unusual proMrty conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements; otl yicMz__________________________ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICAHT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all f^es and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and co^;r^ct to the best of his/her knowledge. Date ct?" ^ ONNERS SIGNATURE Applicant's Signature lied is true and The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council ipei^ers for purposes of investiga tion and verificatio'tn^ef this request. / J Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all s&ittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants mus^ ' present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission anc ncil. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. RUN DATE 01/0A/D9 BAfCH 005 HRi«?IN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST REPORT NO. PIA35401 PAGE 10 c. € c c e c t c c c SB 04-117-2S 22 0010 38 04-117-23 22 0011 38 04-117-23 22 0012 PROP AOOR 00105 CYGNET PL 00135 CYGNET PL 00145 CYPNET PL CBtCR NAME 6 J EHALT ETAL M E OECKERO IKS DECKCRO A E BLOEMENOAAL ETAL TAXPAYER GREGORY J EHALT MONTE E DECKERO ARTHUR E BLOEMENOAAL NAME/AOOR 105 CYGNET PLACE 135 CYGNET PL RT 1 BOX 501F LONG LAKE MN 5555A LONG LAKE m 55355 LONG LAKE MN 55355 SB 04-117-2S 22 0020 38 04-117-23 22 0022 38 04-117-23 22 0023 PROP ADDR 00150 CYGNET PL 00100 CYGNET PL 00130 CYGNET PL (»tCR NAME JAMES H CAMPaON VIL OF ORONO PATRICIA A HARDEN TAXPAYER JAMES M CAMPION CITY OF ORONO MARGARET D ROSSING « M k.NAME/AODR 150 CYGNET PLACE 130 CYGNET PL LONG LAKE MN 55355 LONG LAKE MN 55356 ■'■i: SB 05-117>2S 22 0027 38 04-117-23 22 0028 38 04-117-23 24 0005 PROP ADDR GMNER NAME EST OF UURA FERRELL BRUCE C A KATHRYN S HALL BARBARA K COFFIN r TAXPAYER SHERMAN I LINOSTPOH BRUCE C t KATHRYN S HALL BARBARA K COFFIN NAME/AOOR SOBS NATERTONN RD 3045 HATERT0IR4 RO 3025 ^UTERTOHN RO ’ • ?*•LONG LAKE MN 55355 ORONO MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR TOTAL BATCH 005 00009 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUC REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT, OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THR BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATI JJ-a |_:i2 ^Ua'- ____ .. (y) ifw ‘ i" A - i*• -f m • >/ S !C o' . £ t«i • : (-» U—ffi-i— (i >/ s «s * » t • . -tk mJ 44« (T <( # 138*7j . ... 1 % •<.■*. y**‘• 'A -'?'**:' ■ '‘•j:.”'''*. •••*?i .•... r-v-—• A/ „ « t M* * •y?*’ • ^ V. N I ••I Z ? i'?' c- • f .' •,* •• ••..-• ; T*.- . • - . •■ V ... ^ - • ■ .* r • Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson COUNCIL MEETING APR 101939 /d pron: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Dates April 5, 1989 Subject: #1353 John & Nancy Fiebelkorn, 2730 Shadywood Road - Variance - Revised Request Zoning District - LR-IB, Single fandly. 1 acre, sewered Application - Original request was for construct a swimming pool and associated patio in the 0-75 lakeshore setback zone. Revised request includes removal of the main pool structure but retention of the spa and surround. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Letter Explaining Revised Request Exhibit B - Revised Hardcover Calculations by Applicants Exhibit C - Proposed Site Plan Exhibit D - Notice of Council Action of 1/25/89 Exhibit E - Council Minutes of 1/23/89 Exhibit F - Memo & Exhibits of 1/17/89 Discussion - This item was tabled at Council's January 23rd meeting pending further discussions between applicants and staff regarding: P) timing or removals; B) draft of denial resolution by staff; C) possible revised proposal by applicants. Please refer to your minutes of January 23, 1989. Those minutes Indicate that Council generally felt that there was no hardship to approve even the spa, however, staff has accepted applicants revised proposal for review and consideration by the Council prior to drafting a resolution. The revised proposal incorporates the following elements: 1. Applicants propose to purchase approximately 15 to 20 feet the southeast property line from the neighbor. This v?ill increase the area of applicants* 0-75* and 75-250* zones, thereby decreasing the numerical hardcover increases and gaining the necessary 10 side setback for the pool equipment structure. 2. Applicants propose to remove the pool itself, but leave th® and a small patio around it. The spa and patio would be within the 0-75* setback zone, and would encroach setback line, although the visual encroachment of actual lake views would be minimal. Zoning File #1353 April 5, 1989 Page 2 of 2 a^pliwntrwoJlV remo%e^ a® 58.8%. The slight decrease is the result of adding the pool maintenance building but removing portions of driveway. Please review the exhibits attached, and visit the property to get a first-hand view of the site if you have not already done so. Staff would note for the record that the property from which the additional strip of land will be taken is "PPyo^i^tely 1.2 acres in area. Staff has not as of this writing attempted to determine ^ that property's area will affect its hardcover percentages, however, percentales would certainly increase to a degree. ^*|^® "®"^^J;?''|gcide8 considered in the review of the lot line rearrangement if Council decides to approve the spae Staff Reconendation - Council is requested by the applicants to consider allow them to keep the spa. Applicants have not clearly defined their hardships other than the fact that they have invested large sums of money in this project. Council is requested to review the revised proposal and give staff specific direction to draft a resolution conditional approval as Council sees fit. Specific items to be addressed would be: A) Will the spa be allowed to remain? B) Will the pool equipment building be allowed to remain? C) If the answer to either A or B is yes, is such approval conditioned on completion of a lot line rearrangement? Council may wish to refer this to Planning Commission for review of the revised proposal. John L. and Nancy L. Fiebelkorn 2730 Sha (Jrwood Road Excelsior, Minnesota 55331-9599 March 25, 1989 Orono City Council City of Orono 1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 RE; John L. and Nancy L. Fiebelkorn Application No. 1353 Dear Council Members Please let this letter serve as a request to supplement the previous after-the-fact variance application number 1353. At this time , the council has only conceptually denied the variance. We request that the council review this revised site proposal for approval, before the staff drafts final resolution. We will be removing the swimming pool. We have also agreed to acquire two-tenths of an acre of land from our neighbors to the south, subject to the approval of the city of a lot line rearrangement. If granted, this acquisition will result in our equipment shed, presently in violation of the Cityls setback requirements, being brought into compliance. Under the supplement, we propose to remove 480 square feet of existing conforming driveway hard surface. The result is that we are now seeking a variance permitting us to maintain an at-grade whirlpool spa and a small sitting-patio adjacent to the spa. All of the above items are depicted on the attached site plan. Highlights of the supplement include a net gain of non-hard- surface areas (lawn and landscape areas, etc.) of 910 square feet in the 0 to 75 foot setback area and 1784 square feet net gain beyond the 75 foot setback line. The acquisition and configuration of the adjacent property permits the existing pool equipment/maintenance building to fall within the 10 foot side setback requirements and permits the existing neighbor's boathouse to maintain a 10 foot setback. Enelosure Hardcover Calculations: 2730 Shadywood Road Revised Hardcover Summary per New Site Plan. 0-75* Zone Existing: (Area » 7950 Sq. Ft.) +0-75* Zone Proposed Property Purchase: 8986 So! Ft ' Existing Drive in 0-75V. 364 Sq. Ft. Existing Patio/Deck 0-75* 504 Sq. Ft.- - - 868 Sq. Ft... » ;> 8986 a 9.7% Q-75* Existing Hardsurface PrnpQgQd in 0—75*:_ (Remove 364 Sq. Ft. Driveway) Spa & Patio ^90 Sq. Ft. Patio & Deck _ 504 Sq. F^ 994 Sq. Ft. # 994 4- 8986 « 11.06% 0-75* Proposed Hardsurface (1.36% Gain) 75’-250' zone Existing: (Area » • . +75*-250' Zone Proposed Property Purchase: (Area - J.900 sq. pcj Total* 12>460 SO. rt» Existing House Garage Driveway Patio/Dec)c Rock over Fabric Sidewalk 1852 763 2890 432 1250 Sq. Sq. Sq. Sq Sq 200 Sq. Ft. Ft. Ft. Ft. Ft. Ft. 7387 Sq. Ft. #7-^87 4 12.460 = RQ.3* 75«-250‘ Existing Hardsurface, Proposed in 75*-250': (Remove 116 Sq. Ft. Driveway) Existing House 1852 Sq. Ft. Garage 763 Sq. Ft. Driveway 2774 Sq. Ft. Patio/Deck 432 Sq. Ft. Rock over Fabric 1250 Sq. Ft. Sidewalk 200 Sq. Ft. Pool Maintenance Bldg. _ 64 Sq. Ft^ 7335 Sq. Ft. #7335 4 12.460 = 58.8% 75*-250* Proposed Hardsurface (.5% Reduction) APPLICATIOH NO,1353 CITY OP OSONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 NOTICE OP COUNCIL ACTION Date of Notice: 1/25/89 TO:John & Nancy Fiebelkorn COPIES: Larry Berg 2730 Shadywood Road Fredriksen & Byron Law Firm Excelsior, MN 55331 1100 International Centre 900 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55402-3397 TYPE OP APPLICATION: Variance DATE OP MEETING:1/23/89 VOTE: 4 For 0 Against COUNCIL ACTION - NOTION: Tabled for the following reasons: 1. Applicants may wish to submit a revised proposal for review of saving the spa. However, Council expresed a generally negative attitude toward the likelyhood of such an approval. 2. Applicants to discuss restoration methods/requirements with staff. Please advise staff of your intentions regarding revision of the application. Future Council meetings are scheduled for February 13th and February 27th. Revised plans should be submitted 10 days prior to the meeting for which you wish to be scheduled. If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Recorder or City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 23, 1989 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: #1328 HOWARD JOHNSON 1635 CONCORDIA STREET FINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #2571* It was moved by CounciImember Peterson, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve the lot line rearrangement via Registered Land Survey for Howard Johnson and Helen Trainor at 1635 and 1675 Concordia Street. Motion, Ayes=4, Nays»0, Motion passed. #1353 JOHN FIEBELXORN 2730 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCE Mr. and Mrs. Fiebelkorn were present for this matter, as was their attorney, Larry Berg. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that this matter involved an after-the-fact request for variances for a pool located within the 0-75 ’ zone. The property is restrictive in that there are no other areas in which the pool could be located with the need for variances. Acting Mayor Callahan informed Mr. Berg thahe had the right to present his argument as to why the pool should remain. However, he believed that the Council would vote as did the Planning Commission. Mr. Berg stated that there was a spa and pool equipment shed to consider in addition to the pool. The Dunsheath’s, owners of adjacent property have offered to sell additional property to the Fiebelkorns that would permit the pool equipment shed to be located entirely within the Fiebelkorn’s property. Mr. Berg explained that dredging occurred back in 1970 that created a lagoon area on what was originally dry land on the property now owned by the Fiebelkorns. Mr. Berg also told the Council that the Fiebelkorns did not deliberately disregard Orono's regulations. The violation occurred accidently, due to the Fiebelkorn’s unfamiliarity with Orono's lakeshore regulations. He said that his clients would be willing to do whatever it would take so that the po;l and spa could remain. However, if the Council decides that the pool must be removed, the Fiebelkorns would ask that the spa be allowed to remain and that a "surround" be built around it. Acting Mayor Callahan asked Mr. Berg to explain the hardship in this matter. Mr. Berg cited the land configuration caused by the dredging to be the hardship. He also questioned whether using the average lakeshore setback formula would allow more flexibility in allowing the spa to stay. Mr. Berg explained that there were accessory structures such as tennis courts and docks on neighboring properties that would be closer to Lake Minnetonka than the spa. MINUTES OP THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 23 r 1989 ZONING FILE n353-FIEBELXORN CONTINUED Acting Mayor Callahan said that if the Fiebelkorns wishea to retain the spa only, a separate application would need to be filed for that purpose. CounciImember Goetten stated that she could not allow the pool to remain, mainly due to the precedent it would set. CounciImember Nettles asked about the patio. Mr. Berg informed him that the patio had not yet been built. Goetten commented that the Council should be straight forward with the applicants in regard to the spa. Acting Mayor Callahan said that he believed the pool and the spa must be removed. CounciImembers Nettles and Peterson concurred. Mr. Berg asked if other hardcover were removed if the spa could remain? Acting Mayor Callahan said that he would review their application if submitted, however his inclination was that he would not allow it. CounciImember Goetten said that the Council had been consistent in disallowing any new structures within the 0-75* zone. Acting Mayor Callahan explained that the Council was trying to be polite, but they favored the Planning Commission's views. In addition. CounciImember Goetten observed that there was no hardship for the spa. Mr. Fiebelkorn asked for some gr.idelines as to the removal of the pool. Acting Mayor Callahan stated that the City staff would have to be consulted. City Administrator Bernhardson suggested tabling this macter so that the issue of removal could be further explored. It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by CounciImember Nettles, to table this matter to allow the applicants time to work with the City Staff on the removal of the pool and spa. Motion, Ayes*4, Nays=0, Motion passed. 1360 MERKOW/CHARLTOH 2340/2380 ABINGDON WAY LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT RESOLUTION #2572* It was moved by CounciImember Goetten , CounciImember Peterson, seconded by to adopt Resolution #2572, allowing for the vacation of the dedicated drainage and utility easements. Motion, Ayes»4, Nays»0, Motion passed. 1361 ORONO SCHOOL DISTRICT #278 980 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD VACATION OF EASEMENT RESOLUTION #2573* It was moved by CounciImember Peterson, seconded by CounciImember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2573, granting the vacation of e portion of the dedicated drainage and utility easement. Motion, Ayes=»4, Nays=»0, Motion passed. To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: January 17, 1989 Subject: #1353 John & Nancy Fiebelkorn, :2-730 Shadywood Road - After-the-Fact Variance Application - Request for after-the-fact variances to construct swimming pool and associated patio in 0-75' lakeshore setback zone. Zoning District - LR-IB, single family, 1-acre, sewered List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Letter From Applicants Dated 1/3/89 Exhibit B - Planning Commission Minutes of 11/21/88 Exhibit C - Notice of Planning Commission Action 11/23/88 Exhibit D - Memo & Exhibits of 11/14/88 Discussion - Please review the memo and exhibits of November 14, 1988. Briefly, the property owners are requesting after-the-fact variances for a swimming pool that was constructed in the 0-75' lakeshore zone without permits. They are proposing to construct specific run-off control facilities to mitigate the effects of the additional run-off created. The Planning Commission at their meeting of November 21, 1988, recommended denial of the application on a vote of 6-0, finding no hardship nor any reasonable justificat*rn for granting of the requested variances after-the-fact. Planning Commission discussion indicated that they felt there was no way to mitigate the effects of the proposed structure or hardcover based on location and based on the precedent that approval would set. Staff Recosir ndation - Staff concurs with the Planning Commission recommendation, noting that approval of these after-the-fact variances to hardcover, setback, and average setback would not only be precedent setting, but would jeopardize the integrity of Orono's lakeshore policies, philosophies and ordinances. Staff will draft a resolution for Council's next meeting, based on Council's action on January 23rd. 7-0 A, A > f)t ^ -2^ lotm f moN tnrrm a msuti. |i. fOHH M PALMM IICHAJIO II HAKStN inOMI t. mtUON ROMirr G wma KOWirr P. SANDS RttTN A. U»«fT ROftCIIT I. WHlTLOCt RAYMOND M. LA2AJI THOMAS ■. KINO |OMN M. STOUT }aMU U lAJLUt WiLUAM 1 KAMFf II UKTKAM GUfNKK WAKJUN I HACK |OHN L. POWEJIS CHAKLfS P 01 ^:SSNKK QflXTIN T JOHNSON TIMOTHY M NlANtT lAMIS R. HAUiR hoam H. lAui LIO c. mRN pRKOtaicK 1. rmcH THOMAS W OARTON JOHN A. SATORfUS MICHAKL A STtRN NHL A. WtIRART WILUAM I RRODY JOHN H. MKRKU niOMAS S. PRASKR JOHN A. GRIMSTAO KRIC S ANDIRRON OAVrO R. RUSCH OAYID C. GRORUO KONRAD I PRIIOKMANN LARRY I URO JOHN f IRHART ;OMH G. K05T RATSanN A. HUGHIS JOHN M KONtCK THOMAS R. WILHtLMY PAUL L. LANDRY OUT O. HARtUON FREDRIKSON & BYRON A PROFESilONAL AiSOClATION IlOO INTERNATIONAL CENTRE 900 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55402-3397 TELEX 290569 FREDRIKSON .MPS TELECOPIER i612l 347 7077 TELEPHONE t612l 347-7000 WRITER S DIRECT DIAL (612) 347-7052 January 3, 1989 SANDRA YAlGm »30UU MARY I STRAND CARDIN TtNl «AN-COmCUN SIMON C ROOT wtus I wnOHT |I»II (MSI orcovNfCL HAROLD M fRIDRJKSON KARL t. DIESSNU KARL r COLRORN. )R. Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono 1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 RE; James and Nancy Fiebelkorn Dear Jeanne; It was nice to talk to you this past Wednesday morning, am writing to confirm my understanding that the Fiebelkorns' appearance before the City Council has been moved to Monday evening, January 23rd. I appreciate your permitting us to change dates once again. As we discussed, this will permit to have our landscape architect, engineer and both Jim and Nancy Fiebelkorn present at the meeting. Thanks again for your assistance. Best^regards, / Latxy J. Berg LJB;lml cc; James and Nancy Fiebelkorn Ken Adolf Tad Anderson 5763i MINUTBS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 21, 1988 ZONING FILE #134€-HAGBERG CONTINUED Chairman Kelley asked if hardships were required, in light of the fact that Mr. Hagberg was reducing the hardcover? Gaffron explained that the Council was concerned about the lack of a hardship. Planning Commission member Brown inquired about the amount of hardcover. Gaffron replied that without removals, there would be an increase in the 75' to 250' zone, as well as a slight increase in the 250* to 500' zone. Mr. Hagberg had indicated that he would remove a tin shed that is 101 s.f and remove 120 s.f. and 473 s.f. of rockbeds and plastic. Hardcover within the 0-75' zone would reduce from 18.6% to 17.7%. There would also be a significant reduction in hardcover within the 75- 250' zone. Kelley inquired as to the need to indicate hardships when hardcover is being reduced. Gaffron reiterated that the Planning Commission had not provided any recommendation to the Council that hardcover be reduced. It was moved by Planning Conimission member Cohen, seconded by Planning Commission member Brown, to recommend approval of this application based upon the removal of hardcover as indicated. The hardships in this application are the lack of storage, and the topography of Mr. Hagberg's lot. In addition, Mr. Hagberg will reduce the amount of hardcover on his property. Mption, Ayes*6, Nays*0, Motion passed. #1353 JOHN L. PIEBELKORN 2730 SHADYWOOD ROIId after -the-fact variances PUBLIC HEARING 7:35 P.M. - 8:05 P.M. Mr. and Mrs. Fiebelkorn were present, as was Mr. Larry Berg, "TnT'Attorney for the Fiebelkorns. In addition, Pat Anderson, a Landscape Architect, and Ken Adolph, an Engineer with SchoelL & Madson, Inc., were present. Mr. Berg began by admitting that there ^ere serious problems involved with this application, but aisured the Planning Commissirn that the Fiebelkorns did not intentionally disregard Orono'f ordinances. He said that the Fiebelkorns were new lakes!.*, o homeowners and unaware of the required setbacks. A vinyl pool kit was purchased and installed primarily by Mr. Fiebelkorn. The pool wa.s installed without permits and entirely withing the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone. They are now requesting after-the-fact variances to allow it to remain. Mr. Berg stated that a plan had been developed that he believed would solve pre-existing drainage problems and reduce hardcover. Mr. Berg explained that a portion of the Fiebelkorn's property was dredged, creating a lagoon. Planning Commission member Bellows asked when this dredging occurred. Mr. Berg replied that it occurred in the 1950's. It was his belief that this land alteration was the hardship in this case. He reported that a neighboring property owner had a boathouse on the shoreline that was more obtrusive than the Fiebelkorn's pool. Mr. MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 21, 1988 ZONING PILE #1353-FIEBELKORN CONTINUED Berg stated that the Fiebelkorns had spent $30,000.00 on the pool alone and would be willing to do whatever it would take so the pool could remain. Planning Commission member Hanson asked Mr. Fiebelkorn who he hired to install the pool. Mr. Fiebelkorn explained that he subcontracted for the installation of the pool. Bellows asked at what point the landscape architect was hired. Mr. Anderson replied that it was after the pool had been installed. Hr. Fiebelkorn stated that a co-worker had sold him the pool kit and had hired someone unknown to Mr. Fiebelkorn to dig the hole.-*^f^ Planning Commission member Cohen expressed that in his opinion it was inconceivable that the Fiebelkorns were unaware of the need for a permit to install the pool. Mrs. Fiebelkorn commented that they thought a concrete pool would require a permit, but the type of pool they had purchased would not. Mr. Berg reiterated the fact that a plan had been devised that would maybe allow the City to take a more positive look at the pool because of the existing problems it would alleviate. Chairman Kelley interjected that the pool itself was the only concern of the Planning Commission. Mr. Berg expressed his understanding of how the City viewed certain accessory structures and that lakeshore averaging was often used. Mr. Berg asked that he be given the opportunity to explain the proposal developed by Mr. Anders n and Mr. Adolph before the Planning Commission determined v.hat the pool be removed. Planning Commission member Bellows voiced her opinion that there was nothing that could be done to justify the major excavating and the gross violation of the hardcover and setback requirements. She added that the dredging that was done in the 1950*s did not constitute a hardship for the Fiebelkorns. She felt that it was the Fiebelkorns* responsibility to investigate the City's ordinances and rules pertaining to building. Cohen concurred that he would not be able to justify allowing such a structure to remain in the 0-75* zone. Planning Commission member Hanson informed Mr. Berg that the Planning Commission was an advisory body. It would be much more effective to present their proposals to the City Council. Kelley concurred with Hanson's suggestion. Mr. Berg was persistent in asking that the Planning Commission hear their presentation. Kelley conceded, but asked that the presentation be brief. Mr. Adolph explained that the Fiebelkorns would remove hardcover from the driveway and patio areas. The pool would be used as a detention basin for the runoff. An absorption system would be Installed to handle the drainage. The pool would be large enough to handle the 100 year storm capacity. The runoff would be filtered so that only clean water would run into the soil and Lake Minnetonka. Mr. Anderson explained that landscaping would be used to aesthetically enhance the area MIHUTSS OF THE PLANNIHG COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 21, 1988 ZONING FILE f 1353-FISBBLXORH CONTINUED surroundin9 th© pool* Thor© would b© © n©©d for & sin©ll rotaining wall on the lakeside edge of the pool patio. The retaining wall would also be utilized for the plantings. Mr. Anderson showed pictures of the pool from the lagoon to indicate that the pool was invisible from that point. Vegetation would also be used to screen the pool from view in those areas where it would be easily seen. Mrs. Fiebelkorn added that there was a possibility that 3/lOths of an acre be acquired from a neighbor. By so doing, it would alleviate the problem concerning the pool equipment storage shed. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. Planning Commission member Hanson asked when the Fiebelkorns moved to Orono. Mrs. Fiebelkorn replied they had moved to Orono in 1985. Hanson explained the need to preserve the watershed of Lake Minnetonka. Mrs. Fiebelkorn commented that their lack of knowledge has been very embarrassing. She said that the neighbors had been asking about the outcome of the situation. Mr. Fiebelkorn stated that he was just attempting to improve his property. It was moved by Planning Commission member Bellows, seconded by Planning Commission member Moos, to recommend denial of this application because of the lack of hardship. Motion, Ayes-6, Nays^^O, Motion passed. #1355 J. NBSSBLS 1245 NOODHILL AVENUE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 8:10 P.M. - 8:25 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. The applicant was present for this matter. Planning Commission member Bellows asked why the point was made about the antenna being unrelated to the operation of Mr. Wessels* business. Zoning Administrator Mabusth answered that distinction was made because commercial transmitting cannot occur from residential property. She added that there had been a previous problem with a renter of an adjacent property who used his radio for business purposes. Orono citizen transmitting from his property. Mr. Wessels informed Bellows that amateur radio operation was a hobby of his* He would only transmit for a couple of hours on a weekend morning, as well as late in the evening and very early in the morning on weekdays. He assured the Planning Commission that the use would be entirely recreational, not commercial. Planning Commission member Brown asked for clarification CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 ZONING FILE NO. 1353 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 473-7357 Date of Notice: 11/23/88 TO:John & Nancy Fiebelkorn COPIES TO: Larry S. Berg 2730 Shadywood Road Fredriksen & Byron, P.A. Excelsior, MN 55331 1100 International Centre 900 Second Ave S Minneapolis, MN 55402-3397 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance DATS OF MF'ITING: 11/21/88 VOTE: 6 For 0 Against Planning CoBBission recoimends the following: Denial for reaso’^s noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Denial based on finding no hardship nor any reasonable justification for granting of requested variances after-the-fact. Planning Commission discussion indicated they felt there was no way to mitigate the effects of the proposed structure or hardcover based on location and based on the precedent that approval would set. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council December 12, 1988; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Proa: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Dates November 14, 1988 Subject: #1353 John and Nancy Piebelkom, 2730 Shadywood Road - After-the-Fact Variance - Public Hearing Application - Request for after-the-fact variances to construct swimming pool and associated patio in 0-75* lakeshore setback zone. Soning District - LR-IB, Single Family, 1-Acre, Sewered List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Frchibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Exhibit J - Exhibit K - Exhibit L - Exhibit M - Application Including Applicants' Hardship Statement Plat Map Property Owners List Neighbors* Letters of Non-Objection Survey with Drainage Proposal Staff Sketch on Survey Site Plan Landscape Plan Hardcover Calculations Hardcover Calculations as Revised by Staff Drainage/Run-off Calculations from Applicants' Engineer Photo From Lagoon Area 1970 Airphoto (Lot Vacant) Pertinent Facts - 1. On September 6, 1988, staff was advised by an anonymous caller that a swimming pool was being constructed near the lakeshore at 2730 Shadywood Road. Upon investigation, staff found that an in-ground swimming pool had been constructed totally within the 0-75* lakeshore setback zone. A Stop Order was immediately posted. Staff met with the property owners on September 13, 1988, and advised them that the chances of gaining after-the-fact approval for the construction were minimal at best. The property owners were advised to place proper erosion controls immediately, until the situation was resolved. Zoning File #1353 November 14r 1988 Page 2 of 6 2. 3. 4. The survey provided by the applicants indicates the location of the shore liner but does not verify that the shoreline has been drawn in at the 929.4* elevation. It is staff's opinion after viewing the site, that the 929.4 elevation contour is approximately 15* from the proposed pool apron. However, all hardcover calculations have been made based on the shoreline as shown on the survey, for the sake of simplicity. The entire sub-surface pool structure was completed prior to the Stop Work Order being posted. No work has continued since that date. Hardcover in the 0-75* zone prior to commencement of construction included paved parking area, concrete patio, and portions of a second story deck. These areas comprise 868 s.f. or 10.9% in the 0-75 setback zone. Proposed hardcover in the 0-75* zone is 2,261 s.f. or 28.4%. No hardcover is normally allowed in the 0-75* zone. In the 75-250* zone, pre-existing hardcover (including approximately 1,250 s.f. of rock beds underlain by a porous fabric), is approximately 7,387 s.f. or 70.0%. Applicants propose to remove a portion of the driveway in the 75-250* zone, but also wish after-the- fact approval for a 64 s.f. pool maintenance and supply building, which was also constructed recently and which was found by the surveyor to be encroaching 3* over the line into the neighboring property. The net result is a decrease in hardcover of 62 s.f. in the 75-250* zone, resulting in 69.5% final hardcover. hardcover summary Existing Hardcover 0-75*: 868 s.f. or 10.9% Pronoaed Hardcover 2,261 s.f. or 28.4% 75-250*: 7,387 s.f. or 70.0%7,335 s.f. or 69.5% 5. The specific code sections for which a variance would be needed for after-the-fact approval are as follows; Zoning File #1353 November 14, 1988 Page 3 of 6 A) Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (A) - Structures are not allowed within the 75* lakeshore setback zone. B) Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - This pool i. oPbidered an accessory structure that is located closer to the shoreline than the average lakeshore setback line, past which no encroachment is normally allowed. C) Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - The proposed structure constitutes hardcover in excess of the 0% hardcover allowed in the 0-75* setback zone, and includes land alteration to raise the grade approximately 3* higher than the pre-existing grade, where no such land alteration is normally allowed in the 0-75* zone. D) Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - Also prohibits structures and land alteration within the 0-75* lakeshore setback zone. E) Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) - The required side yard setback for any structure is 10*. There is no basis on which the City can grant approval for a structure that straddles a property line. Note that although this structure is less than 120 s.f. in area, hence it does not technically require a permit, it still must meet the zoning setback requirements. 6. The applicants are proposing to mitigate the effects of the additional run-off created by the pool and patio, by constructing the pool apron such that all water falling on the pool and patio is contained within the pool itself, with an overflow discharge at a presumably slower rate into a drainfield to be located adjacent to the pool. Similar types of run-off infiltration structures have been suggested by the Hennepin Soil and Water Conservation District for use in lakeshore areas, however, such a practice has not been adopted in Orono. Note that, if the drainfield system works as proposed, most of the debris and nutrients carried in the run-off would be carried into the ground for natural dispersal into the watertable. Zoning File #1353 November 14, 1988 Page 4 of 6 7. 8. In addition to not meeting any of the City of Orono's requirements, the pool and patio does not meet the minimum 50' setback for structures as is required by the DNR for new structures, and does not meet the criteria for being less than 250 s.f. in area as is currently proposed by the DNR in their proposed shoreland standards. For the record, the City of Orono since 1975 has maintained stricter land use and setbacks for lakeshore properties than are required by the DNR. The City has the legal right to require more restrictive standards than the DNR. The applicants suggest that past dredging of the lagoon adjacent to their property is a hardship, because it has made the lot area smaller. In fact, the dry buildable lot area has not changed substantially since 1970, as can be verified by a review of the 1970 airphoto attached as Exhibit M. The house was constructed in 1972, prior to the current restrictive lakeshore zoning standards which were adopted in 1975. However, the house itself essentially meets the current 75* lakeshore/10* side/35* street setbacks. Without a doubt, this property is very restricted by current zoning ordinances. However, these restrictions are similar throughout the neighborhood and the community, and there is nothing unique or unusual about this particular situation. Regarding the applicants* description of unusual property conditions, the applicants make the statement "rear-yard area Is a bluff dropping down a relatively sheer face at the rear to the shores of an inlet dredged out to Lake Minnetonka. The surface of applicants* rear yard is not visible from Lake Minnetonka. The existence of a pool or proposed decking surrounding a pool cannot be seen from Lake Minnetonka." It is a fact that the lagoon is considered part of Lake Minnetonka, that the applicants* pre-existing rear yard was very visible from the lagoon area under normal lake elevation conditions, and that the pool, proposed decking, and proposed 2-3* high retaining wall 15* from the normal shoreline of Lake Minnotonka will be very visible encroachments into the required setback area. Staff would note that the entire yard area from the house to the lake is less than a 5% slope, and in no way can be considered a bluff area such as you might find on Casco Point, where often there is a 30-50* sheer drop from the yard to the lakeshore. Zoning File #1353 November 14, 1988 Page 5 of 6 Also note that the elevation of La)-<« Minnetonka (and the lagoon) on Hoveaber 8, 1988 was 926.02', or 3.38* (41*. below the noraal ordinary high water level of 929.4'. Discussion ~ Construction of this pool without obtaining a permit or any prior approval, can only be considered a flagrant violation of Orono's codes, regardless of the applicants* claim that they were unaware of the laws governing development of lakeshore property. Staff is unaware of any similar situation that has received approval before or after-the-fact in contemporary times. In the instances where the City has approved additional hardcover over and above that which pre-exists in the 0-75* zone, the majority have allowed construction only along the lines of the existing house and no closer to the lake than the existing house. Staff is unaware of any precedent situations where hardcover in the 0-75* zone was increased from 10% to as much as 28% to construct an accessory structure. This property simply is not large enough to contain the proposed pool in the limits of what the code allows, nor within the parameters of the hardcover variances which have been allowed in hardship situations for other properties in the City. Even if the drainfleld system does function as proposed to mitigate the effects of the run-off, the setback variance requested is an extreme variance compared to others that have been granted in the City. As noted above, approval for the construction of the pool maintenance building 3* over a neighboring property line would be approval of a new non-conforming structure, which the City cannot allow. There does not appear to be any location within the boundaries of the property other than in the driveway in front of the garage or in the street yard, which would me^ the setback standards for such a structure, i.e. 10* from side lot line, 10* from any other structure, 30* from the street lot line, and no closer to the lake than the existing house. If the pool is allowed to remain, applicants must relocate the pool maintenance and supply building. Zoning File #1353 November 14, 1988 Page 6 of 6 Staff Re ndatlon - Staff would advise the Planning Commission to review the materials and exhibits submitted by the applicants. It would also be helpful to view this property if you have not already done so. In staff's opinion, there are no hardships that have been presented that justify allowing this pool to remain, and there are no unique circumstances about this property that would suggest that those variances would be appropriate. Approval of these after-the—fact variances would be precedent setting, and would in staff's opinion jeopardize the integrity of Orono's lakeshore policies, philosophies and ordinances. The applicants were advised from the start that staff could not in any way support this application. Staff recommends denial of the requested variances, and recommends that the pool and all associated materials be removed from the property, and that the lakeshore yard be restored to its original grade and vegetation cover. Furthermore, staff would recommend that the applicants be required to remove the pool maintenance structure, and either place it in a conforming location or remove it from t’ property. &(JJ A CITY OF OROHO - VARIAHCB APPLICATM^ ^ ^ 1 Initial Application Fee $150.00 // S Cl 4 ($50.00 per each additional variance) rrp- nr Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 AJsvirz nrrrnr (no change from original application) u. After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) ^jct/^:vvvvv_ ________________________________________________________________-___ \)i 40o,0c PROPBRT7 LOCATIOH .___ 4CO.OC RECEIPT-JHAi^K YOU Site Address 2730 _________________________ M115530 COOl ROl T14: ^ 10/26. Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) <^/» / / *7- ^4-* Please check one - Property _ _ abstract or \/^torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICAHT Phone (home) Name •* r>______ Phone (work) OiU4-o Address; on3>0 City; Zip; ---------------------------—------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone ^work)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Address;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _City;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Zip;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date Property Acquired _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USB OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District R. - \ S Present Use of Property Residential ___________ Other fspecify) ______________________ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $_ _ _ _ _ _ _, Describe request in detail;_ _ _rk4rX^\jeX ^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ VARIANCES REQUIRED o.-^.V.eoi _ _ _ Lot Area _ _ _ Lot Width _ _ _ Hardcover Setback Variances (_ _ _ Front _ _ _ Side _ _ _ Rear) Other - HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: DBSCRIPTIOH OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate* list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _2_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date \ q\^~ OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature ___ J. Date \ _______ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. CITY OF ORONO VARIANCE APPLICATION ' Application Fee * $-«00 41 7T 1 o eXHA This application fee includes the initial application fee of $300 to cover Applicants' request for a variance from the applicable hardcover requirements together with an additional $100 fee to cover Applicants' request for a variance from the applicable Lake Shore and Side Yard set-back requirements. Please note that these fees represent double the standard fees as required under Orono's ordinances for after-the-fact variances. PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address: 2730 Shadywood Road Property Identification Number: 21-117-23-24-0033 The Property is Registered ("Torrens") Land. The legal description of the Property is Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 420, files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Date Property Acquired: December, 1984 Applicants do not own the adjacent parcels of land. APPLICANTS John L. Fiebelkorn and Nancy L. Fiebelkorn 2730 Shadywood Road Orono, Minnesota 55331 Home Phone No.: 471-9640 Office Phone No.: 542-0500 (Please send a copy of all correspondence to: Larry J. Berg, Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., 1100 International Centre, 900 Second Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-3397.) PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District: Present Use of Property: 0098R LR-IB Single Family Residential - 1 - DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST 1. Applicants request a variance from the applicable 10-foot side yard setback requirement to enable them to maintain a pool equipment shed which encroaches slightly upon the property owned by their neighbors, the Dunsheath family. When Applicants purchased the Property, the Dunsheaths advised them that a refuse container structure owned and used by the Dunsheaths encroached slightly upon Applicants’ Property and requested permission of Applicants to maintain that structure. Applicants gave their consent. Applicants later constructed the subject pool equipment shed on Applicants' side of that structure. When a survey of Applicants' Property was later prepared. Applicants’ discovered the true location of the Property boundaries. Their neighbors had been in error; the garbage container structure was completely on the Dunsheaths' property, and the pool equipment structure that Applicants had constructed encroached slightly upon their neig^hbor's land. 2. Applicants request a variance from the 75-foot setback requirement to permit Applicants to maintain a swimming pool constructed by Applicants earlier this summer. Prior to the construction of the subject swimming pool. Applicants were unaware of the 75-foot set-back requirement from the shores of Lake Minnetonka. Some years ago, a portion of Applicants’ Property was dredged to create an inlet from Lake Minnetonka. This has resulted in the rear yard portion of Applicants' Property being reduced in size. The pool constructed on the Property is situated on a bluff in the rear yard area, and is not visible from the lake. There is no portion of Applicants’ Property more than 75 feet from the shores of Lake Minnetonka upon which a pool could have been constructed. Applicants are willing to provide such landscaping as may be required by the City to provide additional screening of the pool area. 3. Applicants request a variance from the applicable hardcover requirements. Applicants desire to construct decking around the existing pool area in accordance with the plans attached to this Application. Because of the size of Applicants' lot, any such decking within the rear yard area would fall within the zero hard cover area. - 2 - Atrlicants have retained an engineer who has prepared pl^s for drainage control structures sufficient to cause the drainage on Applicants' Property to be far better following construction of Applicants' pool and any decking proposed to be constructed by Applicants then existed previously. A copy of the engineer’s proposal is attached hereto. COm.m cTXON COSTS 1. Cost of pool; $25,000.00 Pool equipment shed: $1,850.002. 3. 4. Proposed drainage control structure to be constructed by Applicants to improve drainage so as to alleviate hardcover concerns: $1,500.00 Estimated construction costs for proposed pool decking: $10,000.00 VARIANCES REQUIRED 1. Set Back variances: a. Set-back from the 75-foot Shoreline set-back requirement. b. Set-back from the 10-foot Side Yard set-back requirement. 2. Hardcover requirement variance; a. variance to permit construction of pool decking in the zero hardcover area. HARDSHIP The necessity for a Side Yard set-back variance is attributable to a misunderstanding between Applicants and their neighbor as to the location of the existing Property line. The set-back from the shoreline is necessitated by the unusual configuration of Applicants' lot and the placement thereon of Applicants' home which makes all portions of their rear yard area within the 75-foot shonline set-back area. Dredging of a - 3 - portion of their Property years ago has resulted in the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka having been artificially mcdified to create an inlet, the result of which is to deprive Applicants of the ability to maintain any structure whatsoever in their rear yard area. This situation also results in the need for a variance from the applicable hardcover requirement in as much as no hardcover whatsoever would otherwise be permitted in Applicants' rear yard area. DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Applicants' lot is small and the house constructed thereon has been placed so as to render the entire rear yard area within the zero hardcover area and the 75-foot "no structure" set-back area. Applicants' rear yard area is a bluff dropping down a relatively sheer face at the rear to the shores of an inlet dredged out to Lake Minnetonka. The surface of Applicants' rear yard is not visible from Lake Minnetonka. The existence of a pool, or proposed decking surrounding a pool can not be seen from Lake Minnetonka. MISCELLANEOUS Applicants have discussed with their neighbors, the Dunsheath family, subdividing the Dunsheaths' Property so as to permit Applicants to acquire a portion of Tract D, Registered Land Survey No. 420. This would vastly improve Applicants' hardcover ratio and would eliminate the need for the side yard variance requested by Applicants. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS Attached to this Application is a certified 'Property Owners List' showing the owners within 150 feet of Applicants' Property. Also enclosed are ten stamped legal size envelopes pre-addressed to each of the names shown on the above-referenced 'Property Owners List'. Also attached is a certificate of survey including hardcover calculations and a copy of the Registered Land Survey. Finally, a description of the proposed drainage improvements designed by Applicants' engineer is attached as are photographs taken by Applicants of Applicants' rear yard area showing the relationship of Applicants' home, pool and the shores of the inlet leading to Lake Minnetonka. - 4 - Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature: October _, 1988 APPLICANTS' SIGNATURE The Applicants hereby agree to provide all information retired or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agree to pay all fees and/or usual expenses incurred in review of this Application, and certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. ^ — 1Q/26/M,Applicants' Signatures:John L. Fiebelkorn Fiebelkor 10/26/88 Applicants are the owners of the subject Property. - 5 - e/lK. 8 V PART CF l :t 0 1 ♦ .V^V* i. V ' ^ ^ ^. \. >>i TH' •'^- \ :'^=3'^. ••^'^ --^V^ la \I '. / » -" ■“'/i PO . t. \•a • °>^) \ Let 13 _.^ \ N . - - iZ' -T-v- ^ ^ '— __ V €.-* 1 V V ^V ^ .-I ■ ' ■ ~-'H ■V (!/ 1 C-" - 'i^'Zrit'A/^'' iif . o^ <S . s 'KVy 2^ 4^ •• AA)^’'-C( Z>^' S'' \\ y^' / V’ ,V 4 /O.. RUN DATE Of/lA/ea BATCH OOS PROP AOOR OWNER MANE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR 3B tl-117>E3 SA 0004 0E7E5 SHAOYHOGO RO EVA S JACOB EVA 8 JACOB E7E5 SHAOYHOOD RD EXCELSIOR HN 55331 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 3d 21>117>23 24 0005 02735 SHAOYWOOO RO PAUL C CARLSON ETAL PAUL C CARLSON 2735 SHAOYWOOO RD EXCELSIOR HN 55331 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 12 30 21-117-23 24 0021 0003B AOORESS UNASSIGNEO JAM FLEISCHHACKER JOSEPH F FLEISCHHACKER 2775 SHAOYWOOO RO EXCELSIOR MN 55331 30 21-117-23 24 0020 PROP AOOR 00030 AOORESS UNASSIGNEO OWNER NAME DAVID T HOFFMAN TAXPAYER DALUS A VIRGINIA HESSER NANE/ADOR 2673 PHEASANT ROAD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 30 21-117-23 24 0030 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED THOMAS P LOWE ET AL CO-TRUSTEES TRUST REAL ESTATE NW NATL BK 6TH A MARQUETTE MPLS MN 55400 30 21-117-23 24 0031 02700 SHAOYWOOO RO W H NICHOI.LS ETAL WILLIAM H NICHOLLS 2700 SHAOYWOOO ROAD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 30 21-117-23 24 0032 PROP AOOR 02720 SHAOYWOOO RO OWNER NAME JAB KVAH TAXPAYER JOHN C A BEVERLEE A KVAN NAME/AOOR 2720 SHAOYWOOO RO EXCELSIOR MN 55331 30 21-117-23 24 0033 02730 SHAOYWOOO RO JOHN L FIEBELKORN ET AL JOHN L FIEBELKORN AND NANCY L FIEBELKORN 2730 SHAOYWOOO RO EXCELSIOR MN 55331 30 21-117-23 24 0034 02740 SHAOYWOOO RO 0 J OUNSHEATH AMD SO»t4ACK DOUGUS J OUNSHEATH 2740 SHAOYWOOO RO EXCELSIOR MN 55331 30 21-117-23 24 0045 PROP AOOR 00030 AOORESS UNASSIGNEO OWNER NAME DONALD A UYMAN ETAL TAXPAYER LYMAN LUMBER CO NAME/AOOR 337 HATER ST EXCELSIOR MN 55331 30 21-117-23 24 0061 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO JOHN P THIMMESH JOHN P THIMMESH 3430 FLORIDA AVE N CRYSTAL MN 55427 30 21-117-23 24 0062 00030 AOORESS UNASSIGNEO PAUL R NUTT FRED C EDDOWES 2740 LAMPHERE DR NEW HOPE MN 55427 30 21-117-23 24 0063 PROP AOOR 00030 AOOREfS UNASSIGNEO OWNER NAME JOHN P THIMMESH TAXPAYER JERRY C CLIFFORD NAME/AOOR 10516 CAVELL AVE 8 BLOOMINGTON MN 55430 TOTAL BATCH 005 00013 €X//^ D #1 ’'c-.v' ‘l^ September 12, 1988 To Whom It May Concern: I do not object to the Fiebelkorns pool project at 2730 Shadywood Road, Excelsior, Minnesota and this project does noc obstruct our view in anyway. Signature b o ^5 ^ u ✓v s »r\r ^ Name (print) -'“D_____S> Ia A rjj n o Address ^ < c e f C / n r fS\rJ S <!>'}>[ Legal Description Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 420, Hennepin County, Minnesota i ^ q September 12, 1988 To Whom It May Concern: I do not object to the FiebeUorns pool project at 2730 Shadywood Road, Excelsior, Minnesota and this project does not obstruct our view In anyway. /v/ Signature Iv. A/ Alfehi?^LS______ Name, (print) . , Legal Description Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 420, Hennepin County, Minnesota ^ i J J ' September 12, 1988 To Whom It May Concern: I do not object to the Fiebelkorns pool project at 2730 Shadywood Road, Excelsior, Minnesota and this project does not obstruct our view in anyway. 5.fgnature Name (print) J ^ C dr^s . V ^Addr Legal Description Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 420, Hennepin County, Minnesota SURVEY FOR: MR. and MRS. JOHN FIEBELKORN / "= 3^9 -.1 \ \ \ PREPARED BY SCHOELL A MAOSON, INC, - ^ iMOiHttMi . suNviroRt fLANNlMt . SOIL riSTINO exH.p MINNETONKA .4 £>n/\D— ^ /¥^A%. //^E>ICAT^ P(0)PQJ(?ti> -F/AJAt-. P/4r2£>CCl/£AL ^*** -4 i-AHP^fe. <^F VI5W-::; tlim ■ l««<TA <u(t'fltt H9C TC-ViT <:. . i.A>ip «.«■••« »*» *»»<» •••KirjiipM ,;:o;»4t'f . M'hm«»»t» ^<v»y mf w lAfjf «tvMiTfi<,, i|j<i <:M«^«Ara4 h<iX I5«li0 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET FIEBaKORN RESIDENCE Setback Zonet (circle one)^-7S^ 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' *• gristing Hardcover In Zona House length b. Garage c. Driveway d. Sidewalk e. Patio/ Deck f. Landscape ereas underlain by plastic* sheeting £• Other width X X X X X X X X X TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. e.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. Existing Hardcover % - Total Existing Hardcover x IQO Lot Area Within Zone 1 t 328 g f 1 A 7- - - - - - -X 100 - . 7,950 -- - _Additional Hardcover to be added in rone: s.f.Item Length x Width • TOTAL s.f.Retaining Wall 80 x 25 . 200 s.f.Pool ^. 736 s.f._Pa.tio around pool A §p(i x - 1,073 364 s.f._ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ __ X e s.f.TOTAL S.P. TO BE ADDED Existing Hardcover to be Removed, if 2,009 s.f.any: s.f.- - -- - - - - - Length x Width m TOTAT s.f.Driveway(wi.thin 75' setback) i V/ 1 M O . 364 964 s.f. Driveway (beyond 75' setback)116 m s.f.Portion of ex. patio 159m s.f.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - X m0TOTAL S.P. TO BE REMOVED Final Hardcover Proposali I Line (1) ♦ Lin, (j) -Line (3)) - ( 1328 ^ 2009 639 639 s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. (2) s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. (3) -1 *328 ,.f. (1) ____________________- , 2.698 E«i.tin, To b. Add.d Fo b. R.«,v.d ■ i'ffe STAfF CALCS 2698 Proposed Hardcover I - IdneH) X 100 - “A s.f. . X £A,s^ 6*^ c*4i«vpy ^-*7^ Pi2^-e?</:T7/oc« /^g-A-=--?^ro j*4. I>iCH/ewi^ C^S>^y\SL^ srC. s/> 04*8 A<^. T I /0>^ --------* i^/ST7A»c. oor PManp^ ftOL, 4* PfiTTO F/mo/b «<(i»*/-/n') !! "7£.^ i#. /^7i iHr. 90 3/r r,4 l^z^i T7. ■/z-g-v/o J d-TS' ,-wieAA ;d> rz*<^ Arr. (=JiMk<J€ f^^:> x 32.i) ■ ”7^-^ 5.4. 3>'ii\Jtr^A^ Z9?C) 5*-. PA?T?o^^ec< >[ Pocj^e\/tf<.^5^i«ic =s /2^ *”?• . i' ^^V’o' X- *200 ^A.i- ii •7 3 3") s:C. 7337 s^o.o y^ I <---- PxrtrjAJC^ 7X-^ro* 7r'2.ST3' /®i24i<>ose^ i: - //4 i.-4. P/en/iv^A-^/ ~ A^tik 6»V. s.C.VtoU^^AJ-r. gd.j:i6.. ... ...... * Ajrr^ X2-A.f../^^p«iacrT0AJ . ........ -73 S7 - X2. 5 -733^" sf.- ...................... -r fO^ n,0 j -<----eM6i^ 7s-^^o^_ r>tf7T»«A1/A»e«^ “TMAT /eoCK £|^S ftV------ fte>»eow.s PAAa.ve_ ^»6t 1 D«riZ4£<^ ^S - ■ pb<e_ c^rucu.LAn6<o_v*uw2^Qit£-c . ........-......... SCHOELL a MAOSOIM, INC. ^Xf4 . K, DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS FIEBELKORN POOL PROJECT 2730 SHADYWOOO ROAD Drainage Concept; To mitigate the effect on storm runoff of the additional Impervious surface area of the shimming pool and adjacent patio, the pool would be utilized as a detention basin with the patio areas sloped to drain runoff Into the pool. An overflow from the pool would drain the runoff Into a soil absorption water disposal system. Impervious Surface Area; Pool Spa Adjacent Pctlo 736 square feet 33 1040 1809 square feet Required Detention Storage Volume In Pool: Use SCS Method, 100 year frequency, 24 hot* From Fig. 1-8, Rainfall ■ 5.9 In. Use SCS Curve No. 98, From Table 3-3 Runoff - , Detention Volume » 1809 square feet x 5.67 In. » 855 ft!^ ■orm 5.67 In. 12 In/ft Storage Volume Available Pool S Spa 11 Inches freeboard (filter outlet to patio level) Volume - 736 square feet » 33 square ft. x 11 In. TTTnTTt. 675 ft. J >■ Assume flooding patio area (no overflow) Maximum depth on patio - 2 In., avg. depth - 1 In. Additional depth over pool Volume (patio) *1040 s.f. X 1 In. »86 ft.' 12 In/ft Volume (pool) ■736 s.f. X 2 In. * 12 In/ft 122 ft.J Total 883 ft? Final design of soil absorption water disposal system will require soil borings and percolation tests to determine absorption rates. VIEW FROM MOUTH OF LA600N ENTRANCE, SH0MIN6 SCREENING OF POOL AREA (stt plan S*l) fV-: . '.^ IM«a - ,-rjc il iiittiw ... ^■ .'W;.- M w-.'i ■‘-w^ m m0:M ^#.5 « 5 ^ ■■ i‘V z ^ "V *1/ M* ^< \4V ■:'..^£3^* >K'.^' ?&< I Vo A\itetioTO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat DATE: March 31, 1989 CCUNCIL MEETINGAPRlOI9?a 11, CITY OF ORO«0 SUBJECT: Planned Development Ordinance Highway 12 Corrodir/Special Requirements for Rezoning B-6 Commercial Zoning Proposal Attachments: A. Planned Development Memo Dated 2/21/89 B. Proposed Language Changes C. Comparison Diagrams Planned Development/ Conventional Zoning ISSUE - 1. Outline propose changes to date from the draft originally presented. 2. Determination as to whether Council wants to adopt Higway 12 special requirements. Planned Development and/or B-6 Zoning. INTRODUCTION - At the Council's February 27, 1989 Council tabled the issue pending further discussion of the matter with individual CounciImembers. In addition the City Attorney has had an opportunity to review the document and discuss it with John Shardlow, the Planner, who 1 .id prepared it for the City. DISCUSSION - Proposed Highway 12 Special Requirements B~6 and Planned Development Ordinance - The following represent areas where proposed languages contained in Attachment B for language changes to the initial draft (these have not been reviewed by the City Attorney or consultant planner.) These include the following areas: Special Requirements - Limiting any development that desires modifications to available conventional zoning standards to utilize a planned development approach. B-6 - Clarification on which drive-thru business are allowed. Planned Development - Limiting its use to Highway 12 corridor - Clarifying - reference of conventional zoning district which are the basis of the planned development. (An additional issue related to this is specific identifications as to the "underlyingVoriginal districts with which this can be used.) Issue 2, Adoption of the Zoning Amendments - Some of the Council are aware further proposals are being developed in the Highway 12 area and by having this adopted as an available means to undertake development of the parcels that the Comprehensive Plan indicates various uses but which are currently zoned 2 acre rural residential it would allow certain proponents to move forward with their consideration. In one of these proposals Cliff Otten has come forward under the B-1 zoning for consideration of his lawn and garden store on a portion of a large property between Brown Road and Willow. ALTERNATIVES 1. Areas of draft change. A. Add additional changes. B. Delete areas of change. C. Propose alternative language to that suggested in Attachment A. 2. Adoption of the Amendments A. Adopt as presented plus proposed amendments. B. Adopt with other modifications. C. Give conceptual approval. D. Table for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION - Following further discussion it is recommended that the Council give preliminary conceptual adoption approval with final language to be adopted for the Council's April 24. 1989 Council meeting. Jeanne Habusthf Building & Zoning Administrator Mike Gaffron# Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator John Shardlow, Dahlgren, Shardlow, Uban 22289. TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrate)^^ 0 DATS: February 21, 1989 SUBJECT: Planned Development Ordinance Attachment:A. Zoning Admendment - Planned Development Memo Dated 12/13/88 B. Letter to Carol Sattervall - 2/23/89 ISSUE - Determination of issues related to the proposed ordinance that could make it a viable ordinance for adoption. INTuODUCTION - At the Council's January 9, 1989 Council meeting they requested that the item be tabled until they had further opportunity to have the concept discussed with them graphically to illustrate the advantages of a planned development over what currently exists in the zoning ordinance. Since tha** time I have had an opportunity to discuss this, at least on a ii.^tial basis, with all the CounciImembers. In addition the City Attorney has done a further review of the issues and I have had an opportunity to review the conceptual framework with him in the same manner that I have done with the CounciImembers. DISCUSSION Planned Development Concept - A primary focus of the individual discussions with CounciImembers was the concept, how it works and how it differs from currently existing zoning ordinances. Area of Application - A primary concern to the Council was the unknown impact on the community should this type of ordinance be permitted through out the community. As such it would be appropriate that the Planned Development Ordinance draft which is originally intended for the Highway 12 corridor be amended to limit its applicability at this time to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment area along Highway 12 (and should you desire the Navarre area.) At the point that the Council would have more experience with such a ordinance and should it feel appropriate in the future to expand it to other areas, it could then do that. If this is the tact that is to be taken it would be appropriate then that the current conditional use permit sections allowing for planned developments for residential and industrial zones be retained at this time as part of the zoning ordinance. Should expansion be eventaully done to the full community it may appropriate to repeal those at that time. Implementation of Planned Developed District A second issue of concern as to the actual utilization of the planned development. As proposed the planned development zoning would apply only when someone came forward with a proposal and requested that the current zoning be amended to a planned development zone. Unlike some communities the City would not designate or rezone a piece of property to a planned development zoning in the areas that are currently undeveloped until it is requested. Future Councils The issue of future Councils or for that matter the issue of future action by this Council was discussed. With the currently existing zoning ordinances and the process by which they can be amended, the addition of a planned development does not give those individuals anything they would not already have or couldn't pass if they were so inclined. It takes the same 4/5»s vote to rezone a property to Planned Development as it does to adopt the ordinance or amend the Comprehensive Plan. Any rezoning must be in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and if not an amendment to such must be undertaken. Other issues earlier identified included; Project Density Development Criteria Minimum Acreage Process and Review Additional issues that bad not been directly discussed with Council include: Changes to Approved Planned Developments - Should a developer or owner de”slre to deviate from what was approved would require a new rezoning to the amended Planned Development for any change deemed major. (Either the Planned Development Ordinance or the specific development agreement can define what is major and what is not. Changes deemed to be minor would be reviewed by staff.) "Undeveloped" Planned Development - If a CUP/PRD is not developed it just reverts to the original zoning. A Planned Development as a zoning stays for the particular developemnt approved and any change requries a new rezoning. Burden of Proof - In light of Nollan vs California, the burden is on the City to demonstrate that any requirements of the CUP/SubdiVision are related directly to the development. In a Planned Development zoning, the burden of proof is on the proponent to prove to the Council's satisfaction that the overall development is an improvement (including any Council desired requirements). ALTERNATIVES - Action 1. Determine other Issues of concern to the Council. 2. Adopt with limitation of the proposal for the planned development to Highway 12. 3. Table for further discussion. 4. Amend any other issues and adopt. RECOMMENDATION - It is requested that the Council identify other issues at tlvis time that are a concern and table further discussion of this to the March 13th meeting, the limitation to Highway 12 corridor for this usage will be included in the language and in addition any other issues the Council would desire to have addressed. As noted in Attachment B there is interest in selected development proposals in the corridor being resolved. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that the Council table further discussion of the planned development ordinance to the March 13, 1989 meeting. Ayes _, Nays _. John Shardlow, Dahlgren, Shardlow and Uban Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator 121388 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato DATS: December 13, 1988 SUBJECT: Zoning Amendment - Planned Development /( TrAcvVMeur Attachment; A. Comprehensive Plan Zoning Amendment Dated November 22, 1988 B. Planned Development/Traditionally Zoned Subdivision Comparison ISSUE 1. Presentation of issues and alternatives based on the November 28th discussion. 2. Request for Council policy direction in the areas discussed. INTRODUCTION - At the Council’s November 28, 1988 meeting a review of Attachment A was made with the Council tabling the matter to a future meeting. Subsequent to that meeting Attachment B was prepared to further illustrate the difference between a standard rezoning/subdivision and the planned development approach. DISCUSSION - As noted in the comparison the planned development approach on the Reber’s property gave an increased control with standards for the subdivision substantially in excess of those of a traditionally zoned subdivision. The movement from a planned development as a conditional use permit to a rezoning not only requires a 4/5*s majority vote to make effective but is a legislative act to which the Courts give the City broader discretion than a CUP when the applicant meets the "standards’*. Standards can be included in the planned development ordinance in the ways outlined in Attachment A. Any flexibility in these standards is based on an improved "solution" requiring a 4/5th*s vote to allow. Enforcement of a CUP/planned development is by the terms of the developers/subdividers agreement. Enforcement of a planned development as a rezoning can be by both a violation of the zoning code and through the developer's agreement. ALTERNATIVES - 1. Discuss and give staff direction on each of the points outlined on Attachment A. 2. Discuss and table for further discussion. 3. Refer to Planning Commission. 4. Direct staff to amend the draft ordinance in line with the Council's suggestions on the issues to be tabled for adoption at a future meeting. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council give staff direction to be able to bring back a revised draft of the ordinance. This recommendation is based in part on the fact that there are other persons desiring development in the corridor along Highway 12 for which this zoning vehicle would be most appropriate. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that the Council having directed staff regarding revision of the draft ordinance tables the matter until February 1989 for review of an amended draft which could be jointly discussed with the Planning Commission at the February 6th Joint meeting. Ayes _, Nays _. i-ntewirtr 1\ from: 1988 J saeiKi. co..r.««” . ,i.. ”■”oian zonins ;,,tachme«t»: • iO/6/88 ^ ^„ .0. Co^/^or Study ®- fro “ m6 '• -ii.'”•■ SSUE - jlt.rna&l''** r issues 3“'* presentation o 3^eai ,0th dieoussion. • --------i„ each resentatlon of 3,eas iiaoussion. • ^^^^^tlon 1" « Request for Counot October ^^ntifled. ....matter _,.„b Request for October ell considered ';‘‘-3;;;A'ent ^loc-*-";,:;r.«r. K»r:tr.. •- "”'u ...rt ” „l. ‘”..11 p«“” ” ...... .. " .”.• '»• ■” _____ _ Qcount . the amendment to „„,idered r rnmisslon had cons :count. planninS and that th noted that the ? neetlnB t Vt at their Ausust IT. *'* ’“orryel «ss 5 to 0. <‘^*“'^“rounci: or apP*^®^ *. at their • ■“ ’ ” "■ r. ctions in researched. qq v eloP«®*''^ ,_6 Mul....* ' addition the -577 but no furthe^^^ consider a ni from that action was a ^^atting oq^ a phone eonle*’*'"^"'^ '•efeV?"’"' *=Oought it „a '■nation with Hr pau Planned Dev., "Inaft “°">Prenenei;,e ni°"* “°"J “"otion ^ '’" ‘''°''9">ber 3, ‘Oat they h ® to AnrA ‘0, develo ’ he fS®f®fauaaHia . „ •'Ith alternati^a, Connoii at the oil “* "P * ‘he 0cTob7T7tt~*2X2^ _ ‘he area. ‘h* Uat of t!l! '" = l“aion of 1 7,^''•“"•'’ta «"ing typea that . '’‘'“/PUD (if AiteAlternatives J^nclude ona. I’he principal , ““*a «lth the id. * "hdreaaed her. °‘he^Ve7f%7°“^^^^^^ - U»i;a/! «‘aat t:a?lr'’“'’°^»‘'-leta f7^'''' ‘hla laaue ahouid b “^'''“"’‘anoea that la eith'’"'’ ha reviewed. “““Id not ental, '’ "°‘ Alternatives 1. 2. 3. ^^=^^^^^£--5 EZEL0pmpw. j^aave aa ia. “afinitive laund '"•r..., " ..... 1. Planned Develooment Concept - The principal concept underlying a Planned Development ordinance is to allow a City Council increased control on the type of development allowed in an area. Additionally it allows more flexibility as to direction it can undertake in land use. Any sucn developmenc would need to be in line with the City's Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives. The City's current zoning code incorporates a Planned Residential Development (p»0), a Planned Industrial Development (PID) and an . Ttiple Family Planned Residential (MFPRD), all - are forms of planned development with reference t;. :.pecific uses. For Orono. the bulk of uses are covered by those with commercial and mixed use the only exception. The present PRD and PID's however do not afford the amount of control that a more universal Planned Development zoning would allow. The concept avoids the cookie cutter approach of traditional zoning and allows proposals to take into account the needs of the community and the opportunities and limitations on a property. 2, PUD/PRD/PID Comparisons - The Council requested, as part of the discussion of this matter, a comparison of the present PRD*'s and the proposed PUD approach. Pertinent to the comparison is the Planned Industrial District (PID) ordinance the City has in its zoning code. As noted above the present PRD and PID are "subsets" of a PUD. The difference between these present types of PUD's and the proposal is outlined in Attachment 2. The present PRD is not a rezoning, but only a CUP which requires "Council Approval" which could be as minimal as 2 to 1 on a night with three Co unc i 1 per sons are in attendance. The PID is similiar to the PRD. Both of these are to allow more flexibility withi each of the underlining zones but no more control of development, any proposal that would have a use or a density different than existing zoning would require a rezoning in the same manner that you would have rezoning to a Planned Development as proposed. The proposed amendment not only generalizes the uses of the "Planned" approach, it requires an actual rezoning and would require a 4/5’s vote in order for it to be implemented similar to the current M-6 MFPRD. The advantage to this approach is not only that it requires an extraordinary majority of the Council to approve, but also it is a legislative act which the Courts allow more discretion as to the decision by the Council than they would in a ministerial or administrative act that might be found in a "CUP". In order to condition any development as part of a CUP it must reasonably relate to the specific conditions listed under the CUP. This is not a limitation for a rezoning. Issues related to this are addressed oelow. The degree of flexibility allowed is subject to type of benefits gained by the rezonliig. The burden of proof for a development is on the applicant for a rezoning does not adversely effect the community hut is a benefit to the City. Alternatives 1. Adopt a broader Planned Development repealing PRD, PID and MFPRD sections. 2. Adopt a broader Planned Development leaving PRD, PID and MFPRD in place. 3. Leave PRD, PID and MFPRD as they are. 4. Combination thereof. 3. PROJECT DENSITY/AREAS FOR APPLICATIOM - As presented at the October 10, 1988 Council meeting the dr»ft density was subject to the most closely associated district. For PRD»s and PID's as presently Incorporated in the Ordinance they were tied as an overlay district into the underlining zoning. A Planned Development ordinance can be adopted in a various ways to address the density issues. Alternatives 1. Planned Development Ordinance with no density requirements. 2. Planned Development Ordinance subject to most closely associated district. 3. PUD only in selected areas. a) sewered b) delinated areas c) prior districts limitation iLi DEVELOPMENT CRITZaiA - The proposed ordinance as currenTly drafted references the most closely associated district for standards. Depending on the direction of the Council as to where and how density is applied the other standards will be made applicable in a similar manner. In additio.n to the base requirements of the zoning code, througfi^eview process additional controls would be included in a "project specific" design manual that becomes an additional requirement to be met by the development. (The City could have a generic framework developed to indicate issues and level of detail to be addressed ?n project specific manual.) ALTERNATIVES 1. Criteria from other zoning standards. 2. Standards based on prior zoning/or most closely related use, 3. "Project specific" design manual development as part of developer's agreement based on a City developed generic framework for a Planned development specifying issues and level of detail. 5. MINIMUM ACREAGE - The minimum acreage to be brought in for development under a PUD was initially drafted at 5 acres. This parallels the 5 acre minimum found in the PID and MFPRD ordinance. This means that parcels of larger size can be brought in for development, but thac smaller parcels under 5 acres cannot be used under tiie PUD ordinance. The density within this 5 acre ainlmun would be subject to Council decision as to how to approach density and use. ALTERNATIVES A. Leave at 5 acres. B. Decrease. C. Increase SPOT ZONING - Related to the Iraue of minimum acreage l3 the issue of spot zoning. While to some degree this is kn the eye of the beholder, the City has approved zoning areas as small as 1 acre. (Casco Run offic oerty on Shoreline Drive.) 6. PROCESS AMD REVIEW - While the process for PUD involves the staff in a more significant role than the current PRD or current PID does, the process also allows aarly Council involvement into significant design issues that would would not be under the,purview of the Council in a standard rezoning or under the current PRD/PI ' setup in the ordinances. ALTERNATIVES 1. Further delinata the process. 2. Revise the proceed to meet Council goals. 7. FUTURE COUNCILS - This issue was raised To the extent- by both t the e as :iing this Planning Commission and Council, zoning and the zoning amendment require a 4/ does a Comprehensive Plan Amendment ther^ that precludes a future Council (or for that m Council) fro**! alt*-ring the direction and utilization of these ordlnan^'is or similar types of ordinances or ordinances of f'reater concern based on following the appropriate ess. The Council's implementation of a Planned Devvi_:?pment will need to be within the scope of the City's Compr ehens'v c Plan Amendment- seals and objectives. Should t h i ?■ Council not adc broader Planned Development orJuance, future Council's could, re zone * property by tnc '•s e vote that is required to adopt nrjv'd D^ *»’opmei • ordinance or rezone a piece of p 1 Development zoning.. I. vw y 0 aaopt 1 broader Planned Development r :n vsvs. 2. Adopt a Planned Development that reflects Council desires and directions. RECOMMEMDATIOM - The following recommendations are presented; A* SPECIAL REQUIREMEMT3 - Inclusion of a broader Planned development as an authorized approach in this zone . B. COMMERCIAL - Leave as is with uses apart from those listed to be taken under a Planned velopment ordinance C. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - 1. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - Conceptual review and approval . 2* PRD/PUD/PID - Adoption of broader Planned Development ordinance with repeal of the PRD, PID and MFPRD because greater design control gains, vote required and the fact that it is a legislative rather than a ministered act. 3. DENSITY - Limitation in the unsewered areas for the PUD to prior eristlng densities. As for sewered areas this would be a density established by the Council based on Comprehensive Plan. Any increase in density is subject to the applicant demonstrating there is no adverse impact together with a benefit to the City. 4. CRITERIA - Standards to be applied would be Included from the applicable zoning ordinance as modified apd delinated in the rezoning together with a projsct specific deveJ-opment design manual based on ? City developed generic framework out lining issues to be addressed and levels of detail. 5. MINIMUM ACREAGE - It Is recommended that the minimum acreage be left at 5 acres. 6. PROCESS '^at the process be clarified to take into accoun*" ^uncil and staff issues related to this matter. It is further recommended that the Council based on these discussions directs staff to further define the ordinance and bring back an ordinance in line with direction given this evening• PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by that the Council having given staff direction on the matter request that it be incorporated in the Planned Development ordinance amendment for review at the Council's December 12, 1988 meeting. Ayes __, Nays cc: John Shardlow Jeanne Mabusth Michael Gaffron COMPAHISOM OF P8D/PID/POD ATTACHMEHT B PRD PID PUD Tyoe of Land Use Limited to Residential Limited to Industrial Allows flexibility for all types of land use as outlined by Council in the Ordinance Including nixed use Density Same density but allows actual lot size flexibility Same as PRD Depends on standards set. Currently the most closely associated zoning district. Implementation Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit Rezoning Platting Related to subdivision Can be independent of subdivision Related to subdivision Goals Open space Best property fit Best design to fit the City objectives and land topography Design Control Liffltied to land configuration Limited to land configuration Allows standard fro^ desiin^ manual plus negotiated design controls TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato DATS: October 6, 1988 SOBJBCT: Comprehensive Plan Zoning Amendment i . -t. ’ " • - I JL 1 ^ j 'j 3f Attachments:A. Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Highway 12 Dated 6/22/88 B. Draft Ordinance - Revised ISSUE - Presentation of introductory remarks regarding the zoning amendment to implement the Comprehensive Plan Study. INTRODUCTION - At the Council's May 23, 1988 Council meeting^the City had engaged John Shard low to undertake the development of an ordinance to implement the city's Comprehensive Management Plan. The original draft was presented to the Council as Attachment A, and was initially heard by the Planning Commission at their meeting on July 18, 1988 and on a 3 to 2 vote adopted by the Commission at their September 19, 1983 meeting. DISCUSSION - The new draft of the zoning amendment is pres^ented for your consideration at this time, as John Shardlow will be able to be present to indicate concerns the Planning Commission had and how they have been addressed together with being available for any questions you, as a Council, may have regarding the introduction. ALTERNATIVES 1. Adopt the ordinance as presented. 2. Amend and adopt. 3. Table for further discussion. 4. Take no action. RECOMMENDATION - As the document is fairly extensive and ia a significant polllcy item the staff recommends that this be tabled for a minimum of two weeks in order to allow the Council to more fully study the matter, to discuss any further concerns or they have with it and that it then be taken for action at either the October 24 or November 14th meeting. (At present the R«.^ers plan, while following the guidelines contained in toe ordinance, is actually proceeding under the current set of ordinances.; PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the Council table the matter until at least October 24, 1988. Ayes —, Nays John Shardlow TOs Mayor and City Council FROM! Mark Becnha dson. City Administrator - -- - - - DATS: June 22, 1983 SOBJECT: Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Highway 12 Corridor Attachment: A. Zoning ordinance A^dment Drafts Prepared by s/«/sa / ISSUE - work bv Shard low as authorized on ‘ffr'lV.V ..i" =.1! o, «....0 th. Planning Commission for their consideration. tmtrodUCTION - AS noted in Attachment B the Council authorized INTRODU£TX^ A chardlow to undertake the .lecessary Planning Commission for their review. 55r«V/..'nip.f i.5l« t. ...1.. planning Commission recommendation. presently certain property owners in f““.^^^ewf^AnJ ^%rand“tp’o?a\'%rt‘he%”^^ would aw\it the completion of property will be closely followed by these individuals. a^ruetut. is such that it provides for an -unbrella" section incoprorating the P“=°2liUd“in*?he*loip’plan''lBandS^^^ and :S:rin:“o^;^«reV«“;ch°“oV^tre^l?sling fi'tlicts as th, -tuaX provisuions applicable to this corridor. alternatives 1. nicec^ the submission of Wese drafts to the Planningsu^ission OL (^nuu^ c* i Commission for their review and recommendation. 2. Amend and refer. .3* Table for further Council discussion. 4. Take no action. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that these be referred to the Planning Commission for their review and recommendation. it is anticipated that the Planning Commission will have the opportunity to conduct a work session with John Shardlow on July 6, 1983 to review background on performance zoning and the Corridor Study. it is then anticipated that the Planning Commission will consider further work on this and that a public hearing in relationship to these be held perhaps at the August 1, 1988 meeting if appropriate progress has been made. It is^ a'^'ditionally recommended that the Council direct the Planning Commission that their review of this matter is to entail a recommendation on the zoning amenaments needed to the Corridor Study. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by __, seconded by __, that the Council refer the drafts prepared by John Shardlow to the Planning Commission for their consideration and '•ecommendation and that they be directed to undertake the review of the ordinances as to to implement the Comprehensive Plan following appropriate meeting(s) with John Shardlow. Ayes __, Nays __. cc: Planning Commission Members John Shardlow SEC. 10 ._SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REZONING IN THE HIGHPnVY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY AREA. A.Minimum Area To insure consistency with the goals and objectives of the Highway 12 Corridor Study, applications for rezoning within the study area must include a minimum of five acres. The plans siibmitted along with these applications must also include enough information regarding the effect of the proposed development on surrounding parcels to insure that the property can be developed in a manner that is both compatible with adjacent properties and consistent with the Highway 12 Corridor Study. B.Access and Circulation Plain The plans submitted along with the application must propose access to the proposed development which is consistent with the Transportation Planning Objectives of the Highway 12 Corridor Study. All public easements and road right of way that is needed tcp allow the construction of service roads and/or the expansion of Trunk Highway 12 past the subject property, shall be dedicated to the City. C. Sanitary Sewer AvailaJsility The available sanitary sewer capacity to serve the development of this corridor is cmnr^tly very limited. Therefore, any plams to develop within this area must either demonstrate that it can occur utilizing current sewer allocations or they must include improvements to increase the capacity of the systems serving this area. Tf sanitary sewer system improvements are proposed as part of the application, then the feasibility of providing this service will also be scrutinized along with an improvement financing plan to insure that the costs associated with providing this additional capacity will be paid for by the development. D. Storm Water Management Site Drainage plans must be submitted to insure consistency with the storm water management objectives of the Hiahway 12 Corridor Study. Plans will be carefully reviewed to insure both tha^ proposed storrii water ponding areas contain sufficient storage capacity and whatever additional measures are necessary to guarantee that the quality of runoff from the site, meets or exceeds the City's standards. E.Availaible Zoning Districts Due to the unique set of constraints and oppozrtiinities that effect future decisions regarding development within the Highway 12 Corridor Study Area, applicants for rezoning are strongly encouraged to utilize the planned unit development approach, outlined in Sec. 10. of the Orono Zoning Ordinance. However, applications will be accepted for rezoning requests for any of the following existing zoning districts within the City, consistent with a finding of consistency with the Highway 12 Corridc-*^ Study and subject to compliance with all of the additional requirements established in this section: HC Highway Commercial District. PRD Planned Residential Development RIA One Family Residential District RIB One Family Residential District M6 Multiple Family Planned Residential District F. Building Design'.and Construction In addition to other restrictions of this Chapter, the use, construction, alteration or enlargements to any building or structure within the district shall meet the following staindards: 1. All exterior wall finishes on any building shall be: (a) (b) (c) (e) Face brick, or Natural stone, or Specially designed precast -rete units if the surfaces have been inte. .lly treated with 2U1 applied decorative materials or texture, or Factory fabricated and finished metal framed panel construction, if the panel materials be of any of those noted in items a, b and c above, or glass. Other materials as may be approved by the Council. Combinations of such materials shall be permitted. 2. All subsequent additions and outbuildings constructed after the erection of an original building or buildings shall be constructed of materials comparable to those used in the original construction and shall be designed in a manner conforming with the original architectural design and general appearance. 3. No building or structure of a temporary character, trailer, basement, tent or shack shall be constructed, placed or maintained upon the property except as accessory to and during the construction of permament buildings. G. Requirement of Development Agreement All development permits authorized within the Highway 12 Corridor Study Area shall be subject to the execution of development agreement. Said development agreement shall clearly identify the timing of all of the public improvements associated with the development and the developers' financial commitments related to these improvements. The agreement shall also include any and all other conditions of approval deemed necessary to insure compliance with the Special Minimum Requirements for Rezoning the Highway 12 Corridor Study Area, as well as the goals and objectives of the Highway 12 Corridor Study. SEC. 10.45 B-6 HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of the HC Highway Coimercial District is to provide a commercial district specifically tailored to accomplish the commercial development objectives of the Highway 12 Corridor Study Section of the Orono Comprehensive Plan. Subd. 2. Application. All applicants for a building permit in any "B-6” Highway Business District shall be reviewed by the Council and referred to the Planning Commission for review. Subd. 3. Permitted Uses. Within any "B-6" Highway Business District, no structure or land shall be used except for one of the following uses or uses deemed similar by the Council. A. Offices (business and professional). B. Banks and financial institutions. C. Libraries. D. Motels, and hotels. E. Restaurants (Class I). Subd. 4. Relationship with Chapter 10._ Planned Unit Development. Other types of commercial uses and mixed use developments may be applied for through the plamned unit development process. Applications that include commercial uses within the Highway 12 Corridor shall assume the B-6 District as the underlying zoning district. Subd. 4. Conditional Use A. Within any "B-6" .Highway Business District, no structure or land shall be used for one of the following ua«&s excepu by conditional use permit: 1. Any business that includes a drive-thru function. Subd. 5. Accessory Uses. Within any "B-6" Highway Business District, the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses: A. Any accessory use as regulated in the ”B-1" Business District. Subd. 6. Area, Height, Lot Width, Setback Requirements and Design Requirements. The following minimum^ requirements shall be observed subject to additional requirements and exceptions contained in Section of this Title. A.Lot Area two acres B.Lot Widtb 100 ft. C.Setback - Principal Structure Front Yard 30 (35)*ft. Side Interior 10 (35)ft. Side Street 30 (35)ft. Rear Yard 30 (35)ft. D.Setback - Accessory Structure Front Yard 30 (35)*ft. Side Interior 10 (35)ft. Side Street 30 (35)ft. Rear Yard 30 (35)ft. E.Setback - Parking Front 15 (20)ft. Side Interior 5 (10}ft. Street Side 10 (15)ft. Rear Yard 10 (10)ft. Setbacks in parentheses apply adjacent to all residential *30 feet or 1 1/2 times the building height whichever is greater. F. Drainage. No land shall be developed and no use shall be permitted that results in water nmof^ causing floods, erosion, or c ;sits on adjace*, properties. Site and drainag_. plans shall be submitted by the applicant in such detail as required by the Council and those plans shall be reviewed b^ 'e City Engineer before submission to the Plannir iimission and Council for approval. Such runoff be required to be properly channeled into a naturax water course, ponding area, storm drain or other public facilities. Any change in grade affecting water runoff whether onto adjacent property or otherwise must be in compliance with the Surface Water Management Plan and shall be consistent with other applicable regulations or City Code provisions and subject uO the approval of other agencies having jurisdiction over the area affected by the drainage. G. Height. No structure or building s!: ill exceed 2-1/2 stories or thirty feet in height exc.^-iit as provided in Section 10.75. H. At least twenty five percent (25%) of the land area shall be landscaped with grass, approved ground cover, shrubbery auid trees. At least three percent (3%) of the land area within a parking area shall be landscaped. The following minimum sizes shall be required at the time of planting: Overstory Deciduous Trees Omaunental Trees Conife-ous Trees Major Shrub Plantings 2-1/2 inches in diametc 1-1/2 inches in diameter 6 feet tall 5 gallons I. All trash and trash handling equipment shall be stored within the principal structure, within an attached structure accessible from within the principal structure, or totally screened from eye-level view from public streets and adjacent residential properties. If accessor/ structures are proposed, they shall be constructed of tx. seuiie building material as the principal structure and be readily served through swinging doors. J. Garages, accessory st:-uctures, screen walls and exposed areas of retaining walls shall be of similar type, quality and appearance as the principal structure. K. The ground level viow of i:ll mechanical utilities shall be completely scr.^.ined from contiguous properties euid adjacent streets, or designed to be compatible with the architectural treatment of the principal structure. External loading and service areas'^ mult be completely screened from the ground level view from contiguous residential or commercial properties and adjacent streets, except at access points. The light from automobile headlights and other sources shall be screened whenever it may be directed onto adjacent residential windows. SEC. 10.__ PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) SECTION: 10._.A: Authorization 10._.B: Allowed Uses 10._.C: Required Standards 10._.D: Coordination With Subdivision Regulations 10._.E: Revisions and/or Changes 10._.F: Phasing and Guarantee of Performance 10._.G: Control of Planned Unit Development Following Completion 10. .H: Procedure for Processing a Planned Unit Development SECTION 1C ,.A AUTHORIZATION: Planned unit development authorization may allow: Subd. 1. Variety: Within a comprehensive site design concept a mixture of land uses, housing types and densities. Subd. 2. Sensitivity: Through the departure from the strict application of required setbacks, yard areas, lot sizes, minimum house sizes, minimum requirements, and other performance standards associated with traditional zoning, planned unit development can maximize the development potential of land while remaining sensitive to its unique and valuaUrle natural characteristics. Subd. 3. Efficiency: The consolidation of areas for recreation and reductions in street lengths and other utility related expenses. Subd. 4. Density Transfer: The project density may be clustered, basing density on number of units per acre versus specific lot dimensions. Subd. 5. District Integration: The combination of uses which are allowed in separate zoning districts such as: A. Mixed residential allows both densities and unit types to be varied within the project. B. Mixed residential with increased density acknowledging the greater sensitivity of PUD projects, regulation provides increased density on the property if a PUD is utilized. C. Mixed land uses with the integration of compatible land uses within the project. SECTION 10. B ALLOWED USES Siibd. 1. Used within the PUD may include only those uses generally considered associated with the general Icind use category shown for the area on the official Comprehensive Ii2Uid Use Pl2m. Specific allowed uses Ji^d performance standards for each PUD shall be delin^at.ed in an ordinance and development plan. The PUD development plan shall identify all the proposed land uses and those uses shall become permitted uses with the acceptance of the development plan. Any change in list of uses presented in the development plan will be considered an amendment to the PUD and will follow the procedures specified in Section 10. .F of this Title. SECTION 10._.C REQUIRED STANDARDS Subd. 1. The City shall consider the proposed PUD from the point of view of all standards and purposes of the Comprehensive Land use Plan to achieve a maximum coordination between the proposed development and the surrounding uses, the conservation of woodlands and wetlands, the protection of health, safety and welfare of the community and residents of the PUD. To these ends, the City Council shall consider the location of the buildings, compatibility, parking areas and other features with respect to the topography of the area and existing natural features such as streams and large trees; the efficiency, adequacy and safety of the proposed layout of internal streets and driveways; the adequacy and location of green areas; the adequacy, location and screening of parking areas; and such other matters as the Council may find to have a material bearing upon the stated standards and objectives of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. SECTION 10.COORDINATION WITH SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS Subd. 1. Subdivision review under the subdivision regulations shall be carried out simultameously with the review of the PUD. The plauis required under this Chapter shall be submitted in a* form which will satisfy the requirements of the subdivision ordinance for the preliminary and final plat. SECTION 10._.E REVISIONS AND/OR CHANGES Stibd. 1. Minor changes in the location, placemant and height of structures may be authorized by the Development Review Committee if required by engineering or other circumstances not foreseen at the time the final plan was approved and filed with the Zoning Administrator. Subd. 2. Changes in uses, significant changes in the location, size, or height of structures, any rearrangement of lots, blocks and building tracts, changes in the provision of common open spaces, and all other changes to the approved final development plan may be made only after a public hearing conducted by the Council. Any changes shall be recorded as amendments to the recorded copy of the final development plan. Subd. 3. All of the provisions of this Title applic^le to the original district within which the Planned Unit Development District is established shall apply to the PUD District except as otherwise provided in approval of the final pleui. Subd. 4. Heview: If substantial development has not occurred within a reasonable time after approval of the PUD Zoning District, the City Council may instruct the Planning Commission to initiate rezoning to the original zoning district. It shall not be necessary for the City Council to find that the rezoning was in error. SECTION 10._.F PHASING AND GUARANTEE OF PERFORMANCE Subd. 1. The Planning Commission shall compare the actual development accomplished in the various PUD zones with the approved development schedule. Subd. 2. Upon recommendation of the Planning Commission and for good cause shown by the property owner, the Council may extend the limits of the development schedule. Subd. 3. The construction and provision of all of toe common open space and public and recreational facilities which are shown on toe final development plan must proceed at the same rate as toe construction of dwelling units, if any. The Development Review Committee shall review all of toe building permits issued for the PUD and exzunine the construction which has taUcen place on toe site. If they find that toe rate of construction of dwelling units is greater thaui toe rate at which common open spaces and public and recreational facilities have been constructed and provided, they shall forward this information to toe Coiincil for action. Subd. 4- A performance bond or letter of credit shall be required to guarantee performance by toe developer. The amount of this bond or letter of credit, and toe specific elements of toe development prograun that it is intended to guarantee, will be stipulated in toe development agreement. SECTION 10.CONTROL OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOLLOWING COMPLETION Siibd. 1. After the certificate of occupancy has beei issued, the use of the lamd and the construction, modification or alteration of any buildings or str’ictures within the planned development shall be governed by the final development plan. Subd. 2. After the certificate of occupancy has been issued, no changes shall be made in the approved final development plan except upon application as provided below: A. Any minor extensions, alterations or modifications of existing buildings or structures may be authorized by the Development Review Committee if they are consistent with the purposes and intent of the final plan. No change authorized by this Section may increase the cube of any building or structure by more than ten percent (10%). B. Any building or structure that is totally or substantially destroyed may . reconstructed only in compliance with the final development plan unless and amendment to the final development plan is approved under Section 10._.F. C. Changes in the use of the common open space may be authorized by’ an 2unendment to the final development plan under Section 10._.F. D. Any other changes in the final development plan must be authorized by an amendment of the final development plam under Section 10._.F. SECTION 10._.H PROCEDURE FOR PROCESSING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Subd. 1. Application Conference: Upon filing of an application for PUD, the applicant of the proposed PUD shall arrange for amd attend a conference with the Zoning Administrator. The primary purpose of the conference shall be to provide the applicant with an opportunity to gather information and obtain guidance as to the general suitability of his proposal for the area for which it is proposed and its conformity to the provisions of this Title before incurring substantial expense in the preparation of plans, surveys emd other data. Subd. 2. A. General Concept Plan B. Purpose: The general concept plan provides an opportunity for the applicant to submit a plan to the City showing his basic intent and the general nature of the entire development without incurring substantial cost. The plan shall include the following: 1. Overall maximum PUD density range. 2. General location of major streets and pedestrian ways. 3. General location and extent of public and common open space. 4. General location of residential and nonresidential land uses with approximate type and intensities of development. 5. Staging and time schedule of development. 6. Other special criteria for development. Schedule: 1. Developer meets with the Zoning Administrator to discuss the proposed developments. 2. The applicant shall file the concept stage application and preliminary plat, together with all supporting data. 3. Within thirty (30) days after verification by the Zoning Administrator toat the required plan and supporting data is adequate, the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing. 4. The Plsuining Commission shall conduct the hearing and report its findings and make recommendations to the City Council. Notice of the hearing shall consist of a legal property description, description of request, and be published in the official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing and written notification of the hearing shall be mailed at least ten (10) days prior thereto to owners of land within three hundred fifty feet (350') of the boundary of the property in question. 5. The City may request additional infoinaation from the applicant concerning operational factors or retain expert testimony at the expense of the applicant concerning operational factors. 6. The Council may hold a public hearing after the receipt of the report and recommendations from the Planning Commission. If the Planning Commission fails to make a report within sixty (60) days after receipt of the application, then the City Council may proceed without the report. The Council may approve the concept plan and attach such conditions as it deems reasonad:le. Approval shall require a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the entire Council. C. Development Stage: Following general concept approval, if given, the applicant shall submit the development stage application and final plat. The application shall proceed and the acted upon in accordance with Section 10._.F for zoning district changes. If appropriate because of the limited scale of the proposal, the concept stage and development stages may proceed simultaneously. D. Applications: Ten (10) copies of the following exhibits, analysis and plans shall be submitted to the City: General Concept Stage: 1. Preliminary plat and information required by subdivision Title. 2.General Information: (a) The landowner's naune and address and his interest in the subject property. (b) The applicant's naune and address if different from the landowner. (c) The naunes and addresses of all professional consultants who have contributed to the development of the PUD plam being submitted, including attorney, land planner, engineer and surveyor. Evidence that the applicant has sufficient control over the subject property to effectuate the proposed PUD, including a statement of all legal, beneficial, tenancy and contractual interests held in or affecting the subject property and including an up-to-date certified adastract of title or registered property report, and such other evidence as the City Attorney may require to show the status of title or control of the subject property. 3. Present Status: (a) The address auid legal description of the property. (b) The existing zoning classification and present use of the subject property and all lands within one thousand feet (1,000') of the property. (c) A map depicting the existing development of the property and all land within one thousand feet (1,000') thereof and indicating the location of existing streets, property lines, easements, water mains and storm and sanitary sewers, with invert elevations on and within one hundred feet (100') of the property. (d) A written statement general describing the proposed PUD 2Uid the market which it is intended to serve and its demand showing its relationship to the City's Comprehensive Plan and how the proposed PUD is to be designed, arranged and operated in order to permit the development and use of neighboring property in accordance with the applicable regulations of the City. (e) Site Conditions: Graphic reproductions of the existing site conditions at a scale of one inch equals one hundred feet (1" - 100'). (1) Contours; minimum two foot (2") intervals. (2) Location, type and extent of tree cover. (5) (6) (7) Slope analysis. Location and extent of water bodies, wetlands and streams and flood plains within three h'ndred feet (300') of the property. Significant rock outcroppings. Existing drainage patterns. Vistas and significant views. (8) Soil conditions as they affect development. All of the graphics should be the scune scale as the final plan to allow easy cross reference. The use of overlays is recommended for clear reference. Schematic drawing of the proposed development concept including but not limited to the general location of major circulation elements, public and common opjsn space, residential and other land uses. A statement of the estimated total number of dwelling units proposed for the PUD and a teibulation of the proposed approximate allocations of land use expressed in acres and as a percent of the total project area, which shall include at least th^ following; (1) Area devoted to residential uses. (2) •• Area devoted to residential use by building type. (3) Area devoted to common open space. (4) Area devoted to public open space. (5) Approximate area devoted to streets. (6) Approximate area devoted to, and number of, off-street parking and loading spaces and related access. (7) Approximate area, and floor area, devoted to commercial uses. (8) Approximate area, and floor area, devoted to industrial or office use. (h) When the PUD is to be constructed in stages during a period of time extending beyond a single construction season, a schedule for the development of such stages or units shall be submitted stating the approximate beginning and completion date for each such stage or unit and the proportion of the total PUD public or common open space and dwelling units to be provided or constructed during each such state and overall chronology of development to be followed from stage to stage. (i) When the proposed PUD includes . provisions for public or common open spac^ or seir/ice facilities, a statement describing the provision that is to be made for the care and maintenance of such open space or service facilities. (j) Any restrictive covenants that are to be recorded with respect to property included in the proposed PUD. (k) Schematic utilities plans indicating placement of water, sanitary and storm sewers. (l) The City may excuse an applicant from submitting any specific item of information or document required in this stage which it finds to be unnecessary to the consideration of the specific proposal. (m) The City may require the submission of any additional information or documentation which it may find necessary or appropriate to full consideration of the proposed PUD. 4. Development Stage: Development stage submissions should depict and outline the proposed implementations of the general concept stage for the PUD. Information from the general concept stage may be included for background and to provide a basis for the submitted plan. The development stage submissions shall include but not be limited to: (a) A final plat and information required by the City subdivision Title. (b) Ten (10) sets of preliminary plans drawn to a scale of not less than one inch equals one hundred feet (1”»100') (or scale requested by the Administrator containing at least the following information): (1) Proposed naune of the development (which shall not duplicate nor be similar in pronunciation to the naune of any plat theretofore recorded in the county where the subject property is situated). (2.) Property boundary lines and dimensions of the property and any significant topographical or physical features of the property. (3) The location, size use and arrangement includir 7 height in stories and feet and total square feet of ground area coverage and floor area of proposed buildings, including mobile homes, and existing buildings which will - remain, if any. (4) Location, dimensions of all driveways, entrances, curb cuts, parking stalls, loading spaces and access aisles, and all other circulation elements including bike and pedestrian; and the total site coverage of all circulation elements• (5) Location, designation and total area of all common open space. (6) Location, designation and total area proposed to be conveyed or dedicated for public open soace, including parks, playgrounds, school sites and recreational facilities. (7) Proposed lots amd blocks, if any and numbering system. (8) The location, use and size of structures and other land uses on adjacent properties. (9) Detailed sketches and provisions of proposed landscaping. (10) General grading and drainage plans for the developed PUD. (11) Any other information that may have been required by the Planning Commission or Council in conjunction with the approval of the general concept plan. (c) An accurate legal description of the entire area within the PUD for which final development plan approval is sought. (d) A tabulation indicating the number of residential dwelling units and expected population. (e) A ta03ulation indicating the gross square footage, if any, of commercial and industrial floor space by type of actiVwity (e.g. drug store, dry cleaning, supermarket). (f) Preliminairy architectural "typical" plans indicating use, floor, plan, elevations £uid exterior wall finishes of proposed building, including mobile homes. A detailed site plan, suitable for recording, showing the physical layout, design and purpose of all streets, easements, rights of way, utility lines and facilities, lots, block, public and common open space, general landscaping plan, structure, including mobile homes, and uses. Preliminary grading and site alteration plan illustrating changes to existing topography and natural site vegetation. The Plan should clearly reflect the site treatment and its conformance with the approved concept plan. A preliminary plat prepared in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance. A soil erosion control plan acceptable to watershed districts. Department of Natural Resources, Soil Conservation Service, or any other agency with review authority clearly illustrating erosion control measures to be used during construction and as permanent measures. /(■rrACLUiweJST III. IMPL2HBHTATI0H AHD CHAHG2 1. INTRODOCTION This document: represents the summary of the study phase giving* the bacJcgrc'ind# considerations# and conclusions for the alteration of land use patterns in the Highway 12 corridor. This document# submitted as part of the comprehensive plan amendment to the Metropolitan Council# has been reviewed at a public hearing held before the Planning Commission and by the City Council. The review of this comprehensive plan amendment is in addition to the nine meetings that were held during the study phase. During the Metropolitan Council's review of this plan# the City will be working to develop the appropriate zoning implementation tools for this amendment. Implementation tools will break down into two groups. The first group is the standards which will have to be satisfied prior to a property being rezoned. The second set will be the actual zoning standards. Some will be new and others will be revisions of the existing Planned. Unit Development (PUD)# zoning standards incorporated within current ordinances. Upon review and subsequent approval by the Metropolitan Council# the comprehensive plan amendment will be brought back for formal adoption by the City Council. At that time the zoning amendments will, .be considered and adopted to allow for implementation of the comprehensive plan amendment. At the same time the allocation of existing sewer units currently assigned to Orono will be made. Upon adoption of all those items# the City will be in a position to consider requests for rezoning for properties in the corridor. 2. MrMIMUM STANDAi?DS TO ACHIEVE ZONING In order to achieve the periomance zoning classification a developer would have to meet cerrain perforniance standards which would include the following: a) Master Plan Layout - A preliminary design to demonstrate eUaility to meet major issues for performance zoning. b) Minimum Developable Area - This would be a standard to establish the minimum area that a person would have ':o develop in order to achieve the zoning. This would generate developments of significant size to effectively use performance type zoning^ avoiding development on a lot by lot basis. c) ADorooriate Development Schedule . - A timetable of anticipated development. d) tJtilitv Capacities - Demonstration of ability to have utility capacity for the development, plus an improvement financing plan. e) Storm Water Management - Approximate layout to appropriately handle storm water. Traffic/Transoortation - Adequacy of general circulation, capability and direction of plan. 3. PERF0RMANC2 STANDARDS OF THE ZONING DISTRICT ” All zoning changss witiiin iii« corridor will be of the Planned Unit Development nature. Hiesa will be broken down as follows: - Planned Residential Development - Single Family - 1 Dnit/2 Acre - unsewered and sewered up to 1 Dnit/1 Acre - sewered - Multifamily - Up to 10 units per acre depending on square footage of units. — Planned Commercial Development ■“ Development of retail and commercial areas including consolidated retail and IdLmited free standing sites. ) standards Within Each Planned Unit District - Issues that Duld be addressed by the actual performance zoning standards iclude the following: A. site Development Calculation - In an effort to attain protection of appropriate environmental assets determine the amount of the site that is developable through a resource protection calculation. B. Compatibility of Uses - A listing of uses considered compatible within the established performance zoning. C. "Aesthetics" - Standards for development of property would includes 1. Landscaping minimum requirements. 2. Lighting standards. 3. Signage standards. 4. Requirements for compatibility of building materials. /I 5 iu.j X P, There shall he no setback exceptions permitred for any horizontal building addition or hardcover increase of any kind within 75 feet of the shoreline or within 26 feet of any wetland. . ^ ,G. There shall be no setback exceptions permitted without a Council approved variance in cases where any existing building is being reoiaced by a new building, or where the proposed addition, remodeling and/or renovation work constitutes 50 percent or more of the assessor's fair market value for the existing building. In these situations, the new work shall conform to all required setbacks. H. The exceptions authorized by this Subdivision apoly only to setback requir*ements and do not authorize variance of any lot area, hardcover, building height, building area or any other zoning or building code performance standard. Subd. 19. Future Amendments. The "RS” District regulations adopted by this Section represent an innovative attempt to solve the unique problems relating to historic use and previously platted substandard lots on the islands while at the same time assuring the property owners of continued reasonable use of their prooerty. It may be found by subsequent City Councils that this Section"was not restrictive enough to protect the healtn, safety and welfare of the citizens and that new development ootential granted to property owners by this Section may have to be modified. Therefore, no new development rights granted by tnis Section shall be deemed to be vested property rights but shall remain subject to future -modification by the City. Source: Ordinance No. 246 Effective Date: 1-13-83 SEC. 10.32. PHD PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. Subd. 1. Purpose. This plan is available to subdividers subject to Council approval, as alternative to standard minimum lot size subdivision of land. The purpose of this plan is to enhance the appearance of neighborhoods through preservation or natural open spaces, to counteract the effects of uJfban congestion and monotony, to provide cohesive structure to neighborhood design, to offer recreation opportunities close to home, and to aid in improving the welfare in general of City residents. Subd. 2. Submission of Plans, Land owners may submit land subdivision plans for any "R" District without ^^^herence to minimum lot size requirements for each building lot, provided that the total number of building lots, or dwelling units, shall not exceed the number of such lots or units minimum lot size requirements of the zoning district or districbs in which such land is situated. ORONO CC 330 (4-1-84) s 10.32 Sabd. 3. Council Discretion. The dwelling units permitted may be, at the discretion of the Council and subject to the conditions set forth by the Council, in detached, attached or multiple family dwelling structures? subject to the limitations provided for in each zoning district. Subd. 4. Open Space, Etc. The dedication, ownership, use and maintenance of open spaces created by the application of the Planned Residential Development shall be subject to conditions deemed necessary by the Council to assure the preservation of such open spaces for their intended purposes. Subd. 5. Dedication of Open Space. The dedication and ownership of such open spaces may be through: (1) Homeowners Association? (20 Landlord Maintenance? (3) Special Service District? (4) Municipal Ownership? or (5) any other method deemed appropriate by the Council to accomplish the purposes of this plan. SuM. 6. Site Plan. The proposed site plan, including location, spacing and basic design of proposed buildings, street and parking plans, water and sewer (public or private) plans, and plans of open space available for park or recreational purposes, shall be submitted for approval by the Planning Commission and the Council. Subd. 7. Hearings. The Council may dirert that a public hearing be held to review such plans. Subd. 8. Final Approval. Final approval shall not be granted until all conditions set by the Council are met? and, further the Council shall not approve any such Planned Residential Development prior to the legally binding establishment of the open space dedication, ownership and maintenance provisions, such provisions to be guaranteed by bonding or other means satisfactory to the Council. Subd. 9. Subdivision Requirements. All provisions of subdivision procedure established by the City Code except as modified herein above, shall govern applications under this plan. Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 (Sections 10.33 through 10.39, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.) ORONO CC (4-1-84) § 10.50 I. Storage. In addition to other restrictions of this Chapter, all raw materials, supplies, finished or semi finished products and equipment shall be stored within a complete!/ enclosed building; or shall be screened by a fence or wall not less than five feet in height and not less than 50% opaque; provided, however, that motor vehicles necessary to the operation of the principal use and of not more than three-fourths ton capacity may be stored within the permitted parking areas. J. Landscaping. All open areas of any site, lot, tract or parcel shall be graded to provide proper drainage, and except for areas used for parking, drives or storage, shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs or planted ground cover. Such landscaping shall conform with the planting plan approved by the Council at the time the building permit was issued. It shall be the owners* responsibility to see that this landscapiny is maintained in an attraccive and well-kept condition. All vacant lots, tracts or parcels shall also be properly maintained. K. Drainage. No land shall be developed and no use shall be permitted that results in water runoff causing floods, erosion, or deoosits on adjacent properties. Site and drainage plans shall be submitted by the applicant in such detail as required by the Council and those plans shall be reviewed by the City Engineer before submission to the Planning Commission and Council for aooroval. Such runoff may be required to be properly channeled into"a natural water course, ponding area, storm drain or other public facilities. Any change in grade affecting water runoff whether onto adjacent property or otherwise must be in compliance with the Surface Water Management Plan and shall be consistent with other applicable regulations or City Code provisions and subject to the approval of other agencies having jurisdiction over the area affected by the drainage. Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 SEC. 10.51. PID PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Section is to establish provisions for the granting of a conditional use permit to erect a multi-building industrial facility in relation to an over-all design, an integrated physical plan and in accordance with the provisions and procedures as provided hereafter. Subd. 2. Submission of Plans. The owner or owners of any tract of land within an "I” District may submit to the Council for approval a plan for the development and use of such a tract or land for a Planned Industrial District for commercial or other uses permitted in the district within which the land is located by making an application for a conditional use permit authorizing ORONO CC (4-1-84) S 10.51 coraoletion of the development in accordance with the plan. The plan for the development shall conform to the requirements of the district within which it is located except as herein amended. Subd. 3. Size Required. The tract of land for which a development is proposed and a permit requested shall not be less than five (5) acres. Subd. 4. Sewer and Water. The tract shall be served by the City water and sewer system when available and fire hydrants shall be installed according to a plan approved by the Fire Chief as to type and location. Subd. 5. Drainage. A surface drainage system shall be constructed according to a plan approved by the City Engineer. Subd. 6. Parking. The off-street parking spaces shall be painted on the surfaced area according to a plan which has received approval of the Planning Commission and the Council. Subd. 7. Roadways. Private roadways within the^ project shall have an improved surface of 24 feet or more in width and shall be so designed and constructed as to permit the City fire trucks to provide protection to each building. Parking on a 24 foot roadway is to be prohibited? parking shall be permitted on one side of a 30 foot roadway. Subd. 8. Variances. It is the intent of this Section, Industrial Unit Plan, to -provide a means to allow substantial variance from th** provisions of this Chapter including uses, setbacks, height, and similar regulations but not including parking requirements, off-street loading, necessary screening and the like. Variances may be granted for the industrial unit plans provided: A. Certain regulations contained in this Chapter do not realistically apply to the proposed development due to the unique nature of the proposed development; B. The variances, i: granted, would be fully consistent with the general intent and purpose of this Chapter? C. The planned community unit would produce development and an environment of equal or superior quality to that which would result from strict adherence to the provisions of this Chapter? D. The variances will not constitute a threat to the property values, safety, health, or general welfare of the owners or occupants of adjacent or nearby land nor be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the people of Orono? ORONO CC 358 (4-1-84) S 10.51 E. The proposed development is of such a unique nature as to require consideration under conditions of the industrial unit plan; and, F. It shall be determined that the variances are required for reasonable and practicable physical development according to a plan and are not required solely on the basis of financial considerations. Source: Ordine .2 No. 1/2 Effective Date: 1-1-75 (Sections 10.52 through 10.54, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.) ORONO CC 359 (4-1-84) § 10.29 Subd. 4. Height. Mo structure or building in a study and research center shall exceed thirty feet in height except as provided in Section 10.75. Subd. 5. Temporary or Permanent Residents. No study and research center shall at any time serve as a temporary or permanent residence for a number of persons in excess of that determined by multiplying by 2-1/2 the number of acres of land devoted to use as such study and research center without a special permit allowing a greater number of persons in such number and for such periods of time as the Council may deem appropriate, due consideration being given to the interests of health, safety and public welfare. Subd. 6. Use. Mo study and research center shall at any time permit more than 300 persons to be present by invitation upon its property, without a special permit allowing a greater number of persons in such number and for such periods of time as the Council may deem appropriate, due consideration being given to the interests of"health, safety and public welfare. Subd. 7. Area, Height, Lot Width and Yard Requirements. (See Section 10.23, Subdivision 5.) SEC- DISTHICT. 10.30. M-6 MULTIPLE FAxMILY PLANNED RESIDENTIAL Subd. 1. Purpose. The "M-6” Multiple Family Planned Residential District is intended to provide a district which will allow multiple dwellings in. those areas where such development fits the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan, where properly related to other land uses, where there is immediate access to adequate existing arterial highways and public sanitary sewer and in no case where located within 1,000 feet of the Lake Minnetonka. Rezoning of an area to the "M-6" Multiple Family Planned Residential District shall comply with Comprehensive Land Use Plan or may be allowed only after the Comprehensive Land Use Plan is amended to show the possibility of the future rezoning of that area to the "M-6" Multiple Family Planned Residential District. Design and development shall follow the spirit and intent of the land use objectives of Section III-5A of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan as adopted December 2, 1974, and the Guiding Principles of Section 10.01, Subdivision 1 of this Chapter. Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. Within the "M-6" Multiple Family Planned Residential District, no land or structures shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: A. One family detached dwellings as regulated in the "R-IB" District. B. Public owned parks and playgrounds. ORONO CC 290 (4-1-84) S 10.30 Subd. 3. Conditional Uses. Within any "M-o” Multiple Family Planned Residential District, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit; A. Any conditional use as regulated in the ”R-1B" District and as further regulated in the "M-5'* Multiple Family Planned Residential District. B. Multiple Family Planned Residential Project (MFPR Project). Subd. 4. Accessory Uses. Within any "M-o” Multiple Family Residential District, the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses: A. Any accessory use except for "Roadside Stands" as regulated in the "R-IA" District and as further regulated herein. . ^B. Privately owned buildings containing recreation or social functions, garages, or storage areas for maintenance equipment or rubbish. Subd. 5. Area, Lot Width, Yard Requirements, Height and Hard Cover Requirements. The following minimum or maximum reouirements shall apply to all buildings, including accessory buildings excent that permitted, conditional and accessory uses of the "R-IB" Dis"trict as allowed herein shall be regulated by the "R-IB" District requirements. Subd. 6. Minimum MFPR Project Area. An MFPR Project shall not be allowed on an area of less than five acres. Areas of less than five acres may qualify only if the applicant can show that the minimum area should be waived because the proposed MFPR * Project is adjacent to an existing Project which nas been developed under the provisions of this "M-6" District and is designed to create a larger, unified, physically^integrated project, and will contribute to the amenities of the neighborhood. Subd. 7. Density in MFPR Project. The minimum platted lot area per dwelling building in an MFPR Project and the maximum number and type of dwelling buildings allowed in a project are based on the following factors: A. Minimum lot areas as set forth in Subdivision 9 of this Section. ^^B. The area of the platted lot which is dry and buildable based on the Resource Component Analysis of 34.973(b), less public right-of-way. C. The number of bedrooms per dwelling unit. D. The number of each type of dwelling building. E. Required setbacks. ORONO CC (4-1-84) 5 10.30 ?. Credits for housing for low and moderate income individuals and families. G. Required open space. H. Hard-cover areas. Subd. 8. Maximum Percentage of Dwelling Buildings by Type in MFPR Project. Single Family Two Family Three Family Four Family (maximum allowed) 10 percent 40 percent 80 percent 80 percent Subd. 9. Each Dwelling Building in an MFPR Project Shall be Platted to Meeting the Following Minimum Lot Requirements. A. Lot Area B. Lot Width C. Lot Depth D. Front Yard E. Side Yard F. Side Street Yard G. Rear ORONO CC Project 5 ac. (dry buildable area) 300 ft. (on public street) 300 35 feet from project boundary 30 feet from project boundary 35 feet 30 feet Single Family 6,000 sq.ft. 50 ft. (on public or private street) 100 Two Three Four Family Family Family 10,000 16,000 20,000 sq.ft.sq.ft.sq.ft. 65 ft.80 ft.100 ft. (on public (on public (on pub or private or private lic or street)street)private street) 120 120 120 25 feet from public street right-of-way or private street easements. Sum of side yards to be 15 feet, one of which may be 0 feet, but minimum distance between principal structures must be 15 feet unless attached on separate lots. 15 feet from public street right-of-way or private street easements. 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 292 30 feet (4-1-34) Proiect Single Farailv Two Familv Three Familv S 10.30 Four Familv H. Building 15 feet between principal buildings and between Separa- principal building and accessory buildings on separate tion lots in project. 10 feet between principal and accessory buildings on same lot. Subd. 10. Minimum Platted Lot Area Required Per Dwelling Unit (DU) Based on Number of Bedrooms. Efficiency 1 Br. Unit 2 Br. Unit 3 Br. Unit 4 Br. Unit 4.500 sq.ft. (9.7 DU/ac. or 48/5 ac.) 6.000 sq.ft. (7.3 DU/ac. or 36/5 ac.) 7.500 sq.ft. (5.8 DU/ac. or 29/5 ac.) 9.000 sq.ft. (4.8 DU/ac. or 24/5 ac.) 10,000 sq.ft. (4.4 DU/ac. or 22/5 ac.) However, not more than 20% of the dwelling units in any one Project shall be efficiencies. Not more than 40% of the dwelling units in any one project shall be efficiencies and one bedroom units. Subd. 11. Height. No structure or building shall exceed 2-1/2 stories or thirty feet in height except as provided in Section 10.75. Subd. 12. Housing for Low and Moderate Income Persons and Families. In MFPR Projects containing fifty or more dwelling units in all construction*phases, one dwelling unit of every trwelve of the total number of dwelling units shall be provided for eligible persons or families in the low and moderate income range. This provision may be waived by the Council if: of existing low and moderate income housing in the City exceeds the percentage of such dwelling units in the Metropolitan area; (2) funds for subsidy program are not available within one year of application; and (3) the Council determines that the MFPR P*^°3ect location is inaporopriate for such dwelling units because of the lack of public and private support services. A. Density Credit. For all eligible MFPR Projects providing dwelling units for low and moderate families. One additional dwelling unit will be permitted for each twelve dwelling units allowed under the standard lot area requirements of the "M-6" District. B. ProcedJ ’re. In order to provide low and moderate income dwelling units, tne applicant shall ocopose to the Fedecal Housing Administration (FHA) of ^he United States Department of Housing and Dtban Development, , f°“f®dino subsidy funds) under programs for home ownership Condominiums), rental o^ cooperative housing. The proposal shall ORONO CC 29 3 (4-1-84) § 1 - conform to the guidelines established by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development with respect to cost limitations, construction and other standards for development of moderate income dwelling units under the applicable subsidy program(s). The applicant shall furnish any proposal and supporting documents in the form of exchanges of correspondence with responsible officials of the FHA (or other source of subsidy funds), together with affidavits by the proponent reporting its discussions with such officials, indicating, to the extent then possible, whether there are uncommitted funds available for projects to develop low and moderate income dwelling units of the type proposed as well as for other type of units for low and moderate income persons and families, C Satisfaction of Requirement Without a Subsidy. An applicant may propose to satisfy all or part of the low and moderate income dwelling unit requirement without utilizing a government subsidy orogtara; provided, however, that prior to r tnai Plan approval by the Council, the applicant clearly demonstrates and warrants in writing that the proposal will benefit the same number of families at the same i'corae levels, and for -.he same rentals or prices, which the low ano moderate Income dwelling unit requirements are intended to assure. D. Architectural Design Requirement. The architectural design of low and moderate income dwelling units will be consistent with the design of the overall MFPR Project and shall not be physically separated, screened or in any manner made identifiable as distinct from the rest of the development. Subd. 13. Hard Cover. The total hard cover on any one MFPR Project shall not exceed 35%. Subd. 14. Recreation and Open Space, MFPR Projects shall contain an adequate amount of land for park, recreation or local open space use which shall not be less than 10% of the Project area, or the sum of the minimum floor areas based upon the number of bedrooms in Subdivision 16, Subparagraph C below, whichever is greater. The recreation and open space shall be easily accessible to the dwelling unit(s) it is intended to serve. The Project area not eligible to meet this requirement are driveways, parking areas, swamps, drainage areas, sumps, public sidewalks, required yard areas and required lot area required in Subdivision 9 of this Section. Subd. 15. Operating and Maintenance Requirements for Community Recreation and Open Space in MFPR Projects. Common op®*' space (defined as that area of the project area aside for the use and enjoyment of all residents in the Project, residents of lots within a Project which may ownership and on which lots there may or may not be private open apace) shall be subject to requirements in Section 10.32. ORONO CC 294 (4-1-84) s 10.30 Sabd. 16. Building and Sita Design and Construction Requirements. A. A building permit for a multiple dwelling building shall not be issued unless the applicant's building plans, including the site plan, are certified by an architect registered in the State of Minnesota stating that the design of the building and site has been preoared under his direct supervision. Any building of Tyoe I or il construction, as provided in the State Building Code, shall have its electrical, mechanical and structural systems designed by registered engineers. Provisions of this Subdivision shall in no way prohibit the preparation of the site plan by a professional site planner. B. Development within an MFPR Project shall contribute to the image and heritage of the City as a place of beauty, spaciousness and high quality. Proposed buildings, structures and site elements shall be in good proportion; have simolicity of mass and detail; there shall be an appropriate use of materials; colors shall be in good taste and not used for dramatic effect but in harmony with themselves and their environment:. Tne following building materials will not be allowed on exposed exterior blocks or other structural blocks; corrugated metal or fiberglass panels; asbestos or asphaltic siding materials; materials that are subject to rapid deterioration. C. Floor Area Requirements. 1. The minimum net floor area requirements per dwelling unit for multiple dwelling buildings shall be as follows: Efficiency Units One Bedroom Units Two Bedroom Units Three Bedroom Units Four Bedroom Units Five Or More Bedroom Units 500 square feet 700 square feet 850 square feet 950 square feet 1050 square feet 1150 square feet 2 For purposes of measurement, the net floor oC the building bounding the dwelling unit being measured, b^ut shall not Include public stairways, public utility public balconies, or unenclosed public porches, the rooms, furnace areas or rooms, storage areas not within tne apartment, or garages. D. Closets and Bulk Storage. Only closet having a minimum clear finish to finish depth of 2 0 shall be considered in determining the lineal of closet provided. The following minimum amounts of closet and bulk storage shall be provided for each dwelling unit: ORONO CC 295 (4-1-84) § u .sJ 1. Efficiency Units - 8 lineal feet of closet soace and 80 cubic feet of bulk storage. 2. One Bedroom Unit - 12 lineal feet of closet soace and 100 cubic feet of bulk storage. 3. Two Bedroom Unit - 24 lineal feet of closet space and 120 cubic feet of bulk storage. 4. Three or More Bedrooms - For each bedroom in excess of two in any one dwelling unit, an additional 8 lineal feet of closet space and 20 cubic feet of bulk storage volume shall be required. E. Sound. Party and corridor partitions and floor systems shall be of a type rates by a laboratory regularly engaged in sound testing as capable of accomplishing an average sound transmission loss (using a 9 frequency test) of not decibles. Door systems between corridors and dwelling units shall be of solid core* construction and include gaskets and closure plates. Room relationships, hallway designs, door and window placements and plumbing and ventilating installations shall be such that they assist in the control of sound transmission from unit to unit. p. Projecting Air Conditioning and Heating Units. Air conditioning or heating units projecting through exterior walls or windows shall be so located and designed that they neither unnecessarily generate or transmit sound nor disrupt the architectural amenities of the building. Units projecting niore than four inches beyond the exterior finish of a wall shall be permitted only with the written consent of the Building Inspector, which shall be given when building structural systems prevent compliance. G. Trash Incinerators and Garbage. No exterior trash or garbage disposal or storage shall be permitted. There shall be no exterior incineration, and any storage shall be completely enclosed by walls and roof. H. Accessory Buildings. Accessory buildings including structures for the storage of boats and vehicles shall observe the same setback requirements established for the residence buildings. The Council may require common walls for accessory buildings where common walls will eliminate unsigntiy and hazardous areas. Accessory buildings shall have *=he same exterior finish as the principal structure and shall be designed and located on the site in a manner which complements other site elements and facilities. I. The *M-6" District or any development therein may not be adjacent to any One Family District or within 1,000 feet of a lake, or within 200 feet of a wetland. ORONO CC 296 (4-1-84) S 10.30 J. Elevation. No dwelling unit or any part thereof may be built at an elevation lower than the elevation of the ground at the base of the building. K. Entrances, own separate exterior access. Each dwelling unit shall have its L. Parking. There shall be provided on the lot oCiT^'.^ied by the multiple dwelling building two off-street parking per dwelling unit, one of which is an enclosed parking space may be located in or under the multiple dwelling building; detached from the principal building if its location serves some beneficial screening, buffering or transitional function; or else completely underground. In addition, .25 parking spaces per dwelling unit shall be provided for guests, and shall be located conveniently for the units thiy are intended to serve. The main parking areas shall be surfaced with a hard, all-weather, durable dust-free surfacing material and shall be properly drained and landsraped and shall be maintained in a well-kept condicion. No parking area shall occupy any required Project yard area, nor shall it be located closer than five feet to a side or rear lot line, nor closer than ten feet to any principal biUlding. Each parking space shall have a minimum width of nine feet and a minimum depth of 200 feet exclusive of aisles and maneuvering space. All parking areas containing more than six spaces which adjoin either a public street or residentially zoned property shall have a solid wall or fence of not less than three feet nor more than four and one-half feet in height along such adjoining line. Such fences or walls shall be so designed that they are* architecturally harmonious with the principal structures on the lot. A screen planting approved by the Council may be substituted for the required wall or fence.^ Guest parking stalls shall be easily accessible to or from the main entry of the multiple dwelling building. No street parking shall be permitted. M. Internal Streets. All minor internal streets shall be owned and maintained by the owner of the Project, by a Homeowner's Association or by any other agency or method deemed appropriate by the Council. Permanent easements fifty feet in width shall be provided as required by the Council for all private streets. Collector streets which may be required to maintain neighborhood continuity of circulation between MFPR Projects or with other adjoining development shall be provided with a public right-of-way. N. Outside Storage. No boats, recreational vehicles over twenty feet in length, maintenance vehicles or other similar bulky objects shall be permitted on the Project area unless completely enclosed in a building or in an area completely enclosed by a fence of such opacity and height to obscure the stored contents from any living or pedestrian areas on or around the Project area. Required gar?^ges or parking areas shall not be used for the storage of such objects or vehicles. ORONO CC (4-1-84) S li 0. Landscaping. All open areas of the Project or individual platted lots within the Project shall be graded to provide proper drainage, and except for areas used for parking, drives or storage, shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs or planted ground cover. The natural landscape shall be utilized where possible and reinforced with additional landscaping that is compatible with and complementary to the various use areas and functions of the site, the structural additions to the site development on neighboring properties and the adjacent public streets and highways. Landscape materials shall be of adequate size to contribute to the environmental quality at initial planting as well as at maturity. Generally new plant material shall be of the following sizes: deciduous overstory trees - 3 inch caliper; deciduous ornamental trees - 2 inch caliper; evergreen trees - 6 foot height; evergreen shrubs - 24 inch spread or height, dependent on form; deciduous shrubs - 3 feet height. Lawn areas other than natural landscape areas shall be sodded. Such landscaping shall conform with the planting plan approved by the Council at the time the building permit was issued. It shall be the owners' responsibility to see that this landscaping is maintained in an attractive and well-kept condition. All vacant lots, tracts or parcels shall also be properly maintained. Procedure. Subd. 17. Application Review and Administrative A. General Procedure. The general procedure for application, review and action on any Multiple Family Planned Residential Project shall be according to the following outline, with more detailed requirements found in the remainder of this Subdivision. Single family detached dwellings are excluded from the review process. 1. Application, filing fee and six copies of the Preliminary Plan are to be filed with the Planning Commission through the Zoning Administrator at least thirty days prior to the public hearing date. 2. Public hearings shall be held by the Planning Commission for all Projects. 3. Planning staff reviews Preliminary Plan and transmits copies or review to Planning Commission members. City Administrator, Park Board, affected surrounding municipalities other appropriate agencies and applicant at least five days before public hearing before Planning Commission. 4. Planning Commission holds public hearings on Preliminary Plan. 5. Planning Commission makes recommendations for action on Preliminary Plan. 6. Council acts on Preliminary Plan. ORONO CC 298 (4-1-84) S 10.30 7. Applicant submits Final Plan within ninety days of Preliminary Plan approval and fourteen days prior to Final Plan review at Planning Commission meeting.8. The Zoning Administrator transmits copies of the Final Plan to the Planning Commission, Parle Board, Planning Staff, City Engineer, Building Inspector and Fire Chief. 9. Planning Staff reviews Final Plan and makes recommendation to Planning Commission at least five days before meeting. Planning Commission reviews Final Plan, recommends action to Council. 11. If Council approves Pinal Plan, Administrator changes the zoning classification on the Offic a Zoning Map, as required, and files the Final Plan for enforcement. B. Application for an MFPR Project shall be made by the owner of the property except that an option holder provided his application is accompanied by a signed st^ement indicating no objections from hh? --net or owners of all properties involved in the application. C. Application * a Preliminary Plan shall be filed with the designated Adminis^r.rative f accompanied by six copies of the following plans and information. 1. Location maps showing location within City and more specific location on a half section plat map showing all surrounding property linea within 350 feet of the proposed plan. 2. Resource Component Analysis (RCA). purpose of the RCA is to determine specific design Project that will minimize the detrimental effect of f th- natural and man-made environment. Opportunities and CO aints imposed by or on the site will be key considerations in the .‘.ity's Project review procedures. (a) Natural Elements in the RCA shall include documentation and analysis of existing conditions tionships and a projection of the effect the proposed will have upon: Vegetation (forests and woodlands, wetlands, and araaalands)• Geoloqy^ and Soils (bearing capacity, erodibility, and permeability); Slopes and Topography (slope stability,tnd development potential); hydrologic Systems ,^surfa« and groundwater, wetlands, flood plans, and absorption), vJiiaiit (natural habitat, variety, and preservation-protection). (b) Man-made Elements in the RCX include documentation and analysis of the factors that affeef ,?®rnimuSitv either providing opportunities or constraints, Facilities (schools, parks and City services, such as fire OSOHO CC 299 (4-1-84) S polica protection, etc,); Utilities (sanitary sewer, storni sewer, water, electric transmission lines, etc.); Circulation (vehicles and pedestrian); Surrounding Development (character trans'ition/ buffers, orientation/access, scale/bulk, and building materials. 3. If platting of public streets or division of land are proposed, all information required in the Subdivision Regulations Chapter of the City Code for a*Preliminary Plat. 4. General development plan with existing topography at two foot contour intervals indicating: (a) The proposed site and existing development on adjacent properties. (b) All types of uses proposed. (c) Proposed size, location and arrangement of buildings and preliminary architectural delineations including but not limited to schematic building plans and elevations. use. (d) Density or intensity of each type of (e) Parking areas and stall arrangement. (f) Entrance and exit drives. (g) Schematic landscaping showing tree massing^ typical plant groupings, and screen plantings, etc. utility systems. (h> Park and open space lands. (i) Dimensions. (j) Proposed schematic drainage and 5. Summary sheet indicating: (a) Area of land in each use of each separate intensity of use. (b) Number of dwelling units p.oposed including number of bedrooms in each area in Item 4(c) abov’e. (c) Tabulation of parking facilities by type related to number and type of use served. (d) Number of acres and general intended use and ownership of open space. (e) Modifications of any provisions of this Section and any other City Code provisions or regulations of the City. 6. Phasing Plan indicating geographical staging and approximate timing of the Plan or portions thereof. ORONO CC 300 (4-1-84) s 10.30 7. Written statement by the applicant indicating how his proposed development conforms to the stated objectives and purpose of this Section and the Orono Comprehensive Plan and why his proposal would be in the public interest. 8. Fee for filing an MFPR Project application which includes the fees, if required, for subdivision; newspaper oublications of the public hearing; mailing of notices to owners within 350 feet and staff reports shall be as determined by resolution of the Council and may be varied from time to time. Subd. 18. Planning Commission Study and Review of Preliminary Plan. A. The Planning Commission shell make its recommendations to the Council for Project approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Such recommendations shall be made within sixty days of the initial hearing unless the applicant files a v/ritten request to the Planning Commission for delay. If the Planning Commission does not make its recommendations within the specified time period and a delay has not been requested by the applicant, the Council may take action on the request by the applicant. B. The Planning Commission shall be responsible for evaluating the Project in terms of maintaining the desirable character of the City, the neighborhood and site. The Planning Commission shall forward to the Council its recommendations based upon evaluation of the following considerations: 1. Relationship to the Resource Component Analysis. Are the features preserved, protected or enhanced; or are they diminished, destroyed or exploited? . 2. Contribution to the Existing Desirable Qualities of the Neighborhood. Are the local factors of traffic movement, safety, convenience, appearance and general character strengthened? 3. Integration of the Various Site Components. Are the locations and arrangements of the various development elements functionally and aesthetically related to each other as well as to the neighborhood setting? , . ^ u4. Implementation of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Specific Community Objectives. Does the Project «®1P correct a deficiency in the balance of community or neighborhood development? Does it integrate or provide a transition between otherwise incompatible areas of existing or proposed development. 5. Compatibility With Characteristics of Adjacent Development. Are visual features, such as overall scale, bulk, height, building materials, landscaping, color, and open space in harmony with each other and with surrounding development. ORONO CC 301 (4-1-34) S i .jO Are essential but adverse building and site elements properly screened or obscured from neighboring property and public places? C. A finding that any of the above does or does not exist shall not solely be cause for a Project to be unacceptable, but further that it is of such a nature as to produce one or more of the following harmful effects on occupancy of the proposed development or on immediate or neighboring areas: 1. Adversely affects the benefits and desirability of occupancy; 2. Diminishes the stabililty and taxable value; 3. Prevents the most appropriate use of real estate and resources and the most appropriate development; 4. Produces degeneration of property; 5. Produces adverse conditions on the public health, safety and welfare. 0. The Planning Commission and Council may from time to time amend or vary the application and review procedures and the amount and type of documents to be presented. Subd. 19. Final Plan Review. A. Before a building permit is issued for any structures within the proposed site. Final Plan of one or more stages in accordance with building permit requirements and requirements contained in this Section, shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation and to the Council for approval. B. A Final Plan shall be submitted with an application for Final Plan approval within ninety days after Council approval of the Preliminary Plan unless a written request for an extension is submitted by the applicant. If an application for »-pp’-oval or a request for an extension is not received within ninety days, the Preliminary Plan will be considered abandoned and a new application for a Preliminary Plan must be submitted following the Preliminary Plan procedure. There shall be maximum extensions of not more than one year. C. The application for Final -Ian (or for any stages of the Final Plan) approval shall be accompanied by a legal description of the total property together with copies of the following plans and data: 1. A plan with locations of all structures including placement, size and type with existing topography showing two foot contour intervals or spot elevations of a 100 foot grid if such contours are over 100 feet apart. ORONO CC 302 (4-1-84) s 10.30 2. Final architectural plans as required for building permit application. Plans for detached single family dwellings may be submitted directly to the Building Inspector for approval unless part of an MFPR Project. 3. Elevations or sections through the site whicn will best indicate the relationship of the buildings with the various terrain features and site elements. 4. Grading and drainage plan at two foot contour interval or spot elevations on a 100 foot grid if the two foot contours are over 100 feet apart. Site and drainage plans shall be submitted by the applicant in such detail as required by the Council and those plans shall be reviewed by the City Engineer before submission to the Planning Commission and Council for approval. No Project shall be permitted that results in water runoff causing flood, erosion, or deposits on adjacent properties. Such runoff may be required to be properly channeled into a natural watercourse, ponding area, storm drain or other public facilities. Any change in grade affecting water runoff whether onto adjacent property or otherwise must be in compliance with the Surface Water Management Plan and shall be consistent with other applicable regulations or City Code provisions and subject to the approval of other agencies having jurisdiction over the area affected by the drainage. 3. Otility plan for all public utilities and indication of private utility service. 6. Landscape plan showing species and sizes of all plant materials. 7. Legal descriptions of proposed zoning district boundary changes. 8. Deed restrictions, covenants, agreements, by-laws of proposed Homeowner's Association and other documents controlling the use of property, type of construction or development or the activities of future residents. 9. A Title Opinion by the attorney for the applicant addressed to the City showing that as of the date of the filing of the Pinal Plan the applicant has fee title to the property, subject to outstanding easements and mortgages, or showing that applicant has a right to fee title to the property pursuant to a purchase agreement. 10. The applicant certifies on the Final Plan and on any resolution adopting the Final Plan that the applicant agrees to bind himself, his successors and assigns to the Pinal Plan and to limit the development of the property in accordance with the Pinal Plan. 11. The procedures for approving and recording of final plats and resolutions shall be followed if the Pinal Pl^n involves platting or division of land or the platting of_public streets. ORONO CC 303 (4-1-84) S lo.io 12. Any other information which is necessary to fully represent the intentions of the Preliminary Plan. ^ D. The Planning Commission shall review the Final Plan at its first regularly scheduled meeting which occurs at least fourteen days after filing of the application for Final Plan approval. E. The Pinal Plan shall be in compliance with the approved Preliminary Plan, compliance shall mean: substantial Substantial , 1- The number and location of the dwellinqunits has not been changed. ^ 2. Open space has not been decreased or altered to change its original intended design or use. . ,3. All streets, utilities and other soecial conditions prescribed on the Preliminary Plan by the applicant or any of the reviewing bodies have been incorporated into the Pinal Plan. Subd. 20. Zoning Change. If the Final Plan includes a zoning change, the Pinal Plan is attached to and is therefore a part of the ordinance establishing the zoning change. The Zoning Administrator shall then change the zoning classification on the Zoning Map if a zoning change was made and issue a building permit in conformance with the Final Plan as approved. Source: Ordinance No, 185 Effective Date: 6-14-76 SEC. 10.31. RS SBASOHAI. RECREATIONAL DISTRICT. ^ . Subd. 1. Purpose. The "RS" Seasonal Recreational District is intended to provide a district which will allow a low- density seasonal form of residential development or recreational activity on the three Lake Minnetonka islands within Orono. Big Island, Mahpiyata Island and Deering Island are totally surrounded by water. Special problems exist because of their isolated location and because there is no direct access by land or bridge. Transportation is difficult, dangerous, and slow espe^-ially in fall or spring when the ice is forming or melting. Engineering, financial, administrative and practical difficulties prevent servicing the islands with sewer or water utilities, garbage collection, or complete police, fire, medical emergency or other municipal services. The islands have historically been used for summer cabins, camping spots, temporary boat landings and a disabled veteran's summer camp. As long as this usage remains minimal, public health and safety is reasonably maintained. But development forecasts indicate increasing pressures for more intensive usage that could easily exceed the City's public service capabilities. For these reasons, Orono's comprehensive plans have ORONO CC 304 (4-1-84) 1389.: t PLANNED DEVELOPMENT/TBADITIONAL ZONED SUBDIVISION COMPARISON SELECTED FACTORS 715 NORTH BROWN ROAD APPLICATIO^ Proposed Planned Development If Traditionally Zoned Subdivision (2 Acre Standard) Setback from lot line All structures 50 * Rear 30* Sides Primary structure 50* Rear 30* Sides Accessory 10* - setbacks side and rear Buffering 50-70*None Woodland/ Grading Preservation All trees over 2" except - allowed building pad None - Entire site could be cleared out Fencing As agreed to with neighbor No ability to require Screening As agreed to with neighbors No ability to require Lot Design Number/width across "top"No control over configuration that meets minimum standards Lot coverage 80% of building pad with buildings Total area within setbacks (accessory behind front lot line within 10 ft. of lot lines.) N. Brown Repair ♦Security ♦Upgrade Security provided Yes Questionable Construction traffic direction Yes No Construction homes Yes No 1 CBW OF QRQNO CITY Post Office Box 6G«Crystal Bay. Mi On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka -3 February 23, 1989 Carol Sattervall Edina Realty 1120 East Way72ca Boulevard Wayzata, MN 5S391 Dear Ms. Sattervall, Thank you for your letter that we received on February 13, 1989. As a City we empathize with you as to the frustration and experience of the property owner at 725 Dickey Lake Drive. The City is currently working on zoning amendments to give the City the greatest amount of control in the development of property in the Highway 12 corridor and still allow a reasonable use of that property. Th®se significant: zoning amendments are not easily adopted and the Council anJ Ss.aff are continuing to work to develop an acceptable format cor development throughout the Highway 12 corridor. Once this format is finalized however, development will then depend on the ability of the developer and the City to come to a common understanding of the development on the property, it is our understanding, however, that even the initial proposal for Otten Brothers will not utilize the entire acreage t.iat he is purchasing and future development of that may also have on the built environment in which the house at 725 Dickey Lake would exist. It is the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to provide reasonable buffering of the uses between the single family residential and the development to the south. However, the extent of that buffering is to some degree in the ayes of the beholder”. Council and staff will continue to work to provide the ordinance basis in which a development of the property can be brought in, however, shortcuts on the front end of this process may actually be detrimental to the eventual control of the development south of this property. BUILDING a ZONING - 473*7337 ASSESSING administration a finance - 473*7358 PUBLIC WORKS - 473*7359 Carol Sattervall Edina Realty February 23, 1989 Page 2 Thank you for your concerns. Sincerely; ftark E. BeVahardsoi City Administrator MEB/dh Mayor and City Council Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Edina i^Hy. Wayzata/Lake Minnetonka Office 1120 East Wariaca Boolermnl Wiyata. Mlmiesott 55391 (612) 47S-24U February 9, 1989 Mr. Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Village of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Bernhardson: I would like to share with you the frustration we are experiencing in marketing the property located at 725 Dickey Lake Drive. This property has been on the market since March, 1988, competively priced, and still is not sold! We have had several interested families, but the uncertainty of the development of the area across the street has been very detrimental. To make the kind of investment necessary in this property, most people are scared off by the prospect of multiple dwellings and/or commercial development not knowing how this neighborhood would be protected. It Is our understanding the Otten Brothers Nursery has plans to that parcel and with the proper terming and planting, feel this neighborhood would benefit. This is not a pitch for Otten Brothers, as much as an urgent plea to please resolve the issue. The uncertainty is killing the owners chance to selling this property, and certainly delaying the opportunity for Orono to obtain an active interested homeowner. The length of time if-has taken to sell this property, and the prospect, according to Mike Saffron of no decision until late suinner, has created a tremendous hardship for the McKay's. To have buyer after buyer walk away because they don t know what is going to happen across the street has been horrendous! We would appreciate whatever you can do to expedite this situation and eliminate the unknown. Sincerely, Carole Sattepvall REALTOR 3 MU CD ATTACHMBHT B SPECIAL REZONING REQOIREMENTS/HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR Para. E. Add the sentence: "Any proposal which requires a modification to zoning or subdivision requirements must be done as a Planned Unit Development." B-6 HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Subd. 4 Conditional Use Para. 1. "Any business listed as a permitted use in the zone that includes a drive-thru function." PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE Sec. 10. A. Utilization of this Zoning District is limited to the Highway 12 corridor as set forth in the City of Orono's Comprehensive Plan amendment #2 adopted May 23, 1988. dll'"* I j. . t -‘ < •> JUlfiAw.(I - kvA- fesiOwrmt /SvaojO q',^> qi: ■<t) ftsSNifie (w wiioto^ M/s'i i<& ! \ 'n- 3udO)V)\S(5l-* tlv<iJ6 ^«nC6.vJT (^^•rOLlP 'i /'A (C> ^ 0 v\' ^jS’KiiiOcCi'r N5iOPi>) ‘t|a‘i (^TU'»A T'A\s OR. .o..u\j^) CPt**U*. J r.MOX- /CAj-fJ ^ ^q -^1 \L.) r oV (fU 6uriA»SU«*/2- A. . , 0'» Pl«ak>W^ CoKi^xipT / banx.«iPp\^i)A3 r ''■ r*N <"•!.■>••!■:' r /3A)£4iu»a-“ Ofrytt/|?W O^A ' '0 ^ 0 ««««% n a <i ^ ^bjpw^ <0 o ^ n \ 7 ) f\f ^ *• ■ -L ' . t 1 •' ^ Q Co*4«/r / 11789.2 Mqiiicad wot* Standards 9EMCMD SOHXNVSQBDmSION 2 actions 4/5's If roaoning naeded ■ajoci^ of those present foe aubdivialon (2 of 3) No Qiarantae of following throu^ with plan pceaented onoe reaoning granted Mqr already liave desired aoning As set forth in ordinance PBD/mD AS COP'S 3 actions sane as standard plus siaple najority for CUP As set forth in standard aone ordinanoa plus any iafiosad by OOP's PLAMIED CEVSiGPMDir Single action requires 4 of S All PD's require a reaoning action Standards as referenoad or established in the ordinanoa plus all "standards” developed in design franework that are agreeable to Ooiaicil (Can be just like standard if Council so deens) Availability bo use Nhere^ver approved in acoordanoe with Soap Plan or acdification Sane as standard Sane as standard but nay also be further liaited as stabri in ordinance bo area such as Huy 12 Issuaa of Generally not addressed in cezoning transportation or subdivision esoept a requirement etc. for subdivision streets/utilities • Buy 12 "special requireannts* are an "overlay* of standard reaoning Sane as standard Addressed in developnent of plan to 4/5'a Ooisioil satisfaction Oo^patibili^ of uses use treated separately » May require splitting up Sams as standard Biables handling larger areas with with several different uses in single consideration Judicial review Xoning - Legislature Subdivision • If standards amt must grant SaeiQ as standards for OTP if standards eeet little discretion Legislative action broader discretion ^ AS 32189.4 Cit, council X MEETING FROM: Mark E. Betnhradson, City Administrator DATE: April 3, 1989 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Interviews Attachments: APRioisaa CITY OF ORONO A. Letters of Intent - Stephen Johnston - John Thiesse B. Proposed Questionaire C. Current Planning Commission Members D. Planning Commission Interview Memo Dated 3/22/89 E. Planning Commission Interview Memo Dated 4/15/88 ISSUE - Selection of individuals for the three terms that expire on March 31, 1989. INTRODUCTION - The Planning Commission appointment terms ^of Charles Kelley, Maureen Bellows and Sara Moos expire March 31, 1989. All three have indicated their interest in continuing to serve on the Commission. Attachment B outlines a proposed questionaire that could be jjsed as a means for interviewing the candidates. In addition to those three a total of 2 individuals have expressed interest. The total list of individuals is as follows: Lake- Name Address Area shore Stephen M. Johnson 900 North Shore Dr. West Rural No John B.Thiesse 3845 Bayside Road Rural Yes ALTERNATIVES Issue 1. Interviews A- Conduct and conclude the interviews. B. Continue the interviews for a later meeting. Issue 2. SelectionA. Make selection following completion. B. Table selection until April 24th meeting. C. Ask for further applications. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that following the interviews that the Council make a selection at the Council meeting. It should be noted that the Planning Commission supports the re appointment of the three existing members. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by __, seconded by __, that the Council selec^-ion t_ _ _ _ _ _ _^Planning Commission terms effective April I, 1989.Ayes —, Nays 20 March, 1909 Mayor and City Council City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Planning Commission vacancy Ladies and Gentlemen: Plaaa* acoapt ny application Cor tha current Planning Commission vtotnoy I have enclosed my formal resume for your f''f”* can clarify or expand upon any of its contents, please le know. M as^^a. canH T have lived in Orono for a little over a year. We "cLU'to'fuiid ‘'rur ^Vtn^“^^i^rg “u^^i^^^^" ii“n"'irr%"e^:n\“:-cltv oromotes and the high quaj.iry or a* k »B::hoor tt use my position on the Planning Commission to help protecrand preLrve the wildlife and habitat in this community. I am a professional Civil Engineer registered in the State of MinnasotL I am involved in Planning and^designing >^«xde^tial. commercial ngibilitias conflict with my personal Although at timaa «y with proper planning and Sir^cr irif possible find workable compromises to these Vitiations. I cVn bring this skill to the Planning Commission. I believe this skill makes me uniquely qualified to help resolve I look forward to having the opportunity to serve on «ha Planning CoiV?«ion in Orono. Again, I encourage you to contact regarding any questions you may have. Stephen M. Johnston 900 North Shore Drive West Mound, Minnesota 55364 472 - 0007 (Evenings) 533 - 7595 (Days) STEPHEN M. JOHNSTON 900 North Shore Drive West Orono, Minnesota 55364 (612)472-8007 QUAUFICATIONS PROFILE Proven ability to perform effectively as a CivU Engineer in all areas of Municipal Engineering, in both the Public and Private sector. Skilled in working with government agencies and the general public. Possess good understanding of the workings and responsibilities of various aspects of municipal government Ability to work independently with little supervision. Able to delegate work effectively to others. Hold Bachelor’s Degree in Civil Engineering. Excellent verbal and written communication skills. EXPERIENCE PROJECT ENGINEER (2/86 to present) Merila and Associates. Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. Hired as Design Engineer to work primarily on Commercial Industrial and Multi-family Residential projects. Promoted to Project Engineer position designing Residential Developments. Position requires supervision of designers, draftsmen and inspectors. Entered below is a partial list of current and past projects: 1) Military Housing Site. Belle Fourche. SD - Housing site for 60 families 2) Allograph Commercial Building, Plymouth, M 3) Lemay Lake Hills Townhomes. Eagan, MN - 48 Townhome sites 4) Bur Oak Hills, Eagan, MN - 211 Residential Home sites 5) Lake Camelot Estates, Plymouth, MN - 196 Single-family Home sites - 320 Multi-family Home sites 6) Park Square Shopping Center, Brooklyn Park, MN Specific Responsibilities: Preparation of: - Concept Layouts for proposed developments - Preliminary Plat Documents - Environmental Assessment worksheets • Preliminary and Final Cost Estimates - Government Agency Permit / ^plicatio^s (i.e., DNR, Watershed, Army Corps.. HUD/FHA, etc.) Design: - Site Grading Plans - Sanitary Sewer and Water - Storm Sewer and Detention Ponds - Streets, Parking Lots, Trails and Playground Facilities Have supervised up to 12 technicians and design engineers concurrently Computer/CAD experience Management of projects during construction EXPERIENCE {Continued) CIVIL ENGINEER (6/81 to 2/86) City of Maple Grove, Maple Grove, Minnesota. Joined city staff as Engineering Aide to assist in project inspection and drafting. Later returned as Engineering Administrative Technician and gained experience in additional areas, including: project bonding, easement document preparation, subdivision platting requirements and the preparation of developers’ agreements. Promoted to Civil Engineer. Responsibilities included: . Preparing Assessment Roles upon project completion - Reviewing Site Plans to ensure they met with City Standards - Granting approval on Grading and Development Plans - Designing Street and Utility Projects and seeing them through to completion - Preparing and submitting special Reports on Long-range Capital Improvement Planning - Overseeing and scheduling work for four Engineering Technicians - Establishing Procedures to minimize design/construction problems - Preparing Traffic Studies EDUCATION BACHELOR OF CIVIL ENGINEERING (1984) University of Minnesota. Minneapolis. Emphasis onTransporution/Municipal Engineering. Completed 95% of course-work in 1982 and finished while working full-time as a QvU Engineer at the City of Maple Grove. Continuing Education includes: Inspection. Pavement Design and Storm Sewer Design. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER - State of Mirmesota AcnvmES Sigma Chi Fraternity - Vice President, Social Chariman. Chapter Editor Inter-Fratemity Council - Representative Twin City Power Boat Association - Secretary/Treasurer Minnesota Student Assembly University Senate Institute of Technology Student Board Softball. Golf, Camping REFERENCES Available upon request iKSUD^ NIIR24£e9 ly March 24, 1989 Ms. Jean Habusth Zoning Administra-:or CITY OF ORONO 1335 Brown Road Orono, Minnesota 55356 Dear Jean: I would like to express my interest in one of the positions on the planning commission. Enclosed please find my resume. I have lived in Orono for less than one year and I have no previous community service experience, but I think my professional background and knowledge would be an asset to the commission. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, John Thiesse JOHN B. THIESSE PERSONAL ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: 3845 Bayside Road Orono, Minnesota (612) 475-4085 55356 EDUCATZOM EXPERIENCE 1983-PRESENT 1982-1983 1981 1972-1979 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, MINNEAPOLIS Bachelor of Civil Engineering, 1983 STRGAR-ROSCOE-FADSCH, INC. Suite 150 One Carlson Par3cway North Minneapolis, Minnesota 55447 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Major projects include: The University of Minnesota East Bank Parking Facility and the Three Downtown Third Avenue Distributor Parking structures in Minneapolis. Other experience includes miscellaneous residential structural design and some state bridge design. Majority of experience is in post- tensioned concrete design using STAAD- III and POSTEN computer programs. ST. ANTHONY FALLS HYDRAULIC LABORATORY Minneapolis, Minnesota ENGINEER ASSISTANT: Assisted in the design and fabrication of hydraulic models used for design studies• VOGT HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING St. Louis Park, Minnesota INSTALLER: Summer employment installing commercial and residential heating and air conditioning duct work. WACHHOLZ MASONRY, INC. Waconia, Minnesota MASON: Journeyman mason in construction of light commercial and residential masonry structures. AFFILIATIONS: 1979-Present American Society of Civil Engineers FLAHHXII6 COIMXMXOII XWT^XTXBHS P08ITZ0II OOiaTIOWIM 1. Sunary of •dueatien and axparlanca background! 2. What Intaraatad you about aarviea on tha Planning Conlaaloni 420ft. a. } Attend a Planning Connlaalon Mating b. ) Ravlaw tha Conprahanalaa Plan e«) Raviaw tha toning Coda 4. Ara you faniliar with tha aaating aehadula and Planning CoaalaiJon dutlaa. :■ '■ f ■■ -r-»1-* '^ • • ' - -iV • ;. - 'i ■■ ; \ % a . . f* ■ 'V , '• • :i- ■ •;, - » . \'* - -'^Zj - ^ 4 fT . I ■•. V1 fS’i*: 1988 DZBECT0R7 OF CITT OFFICIALS ABD BMPLOXSl MAME 8 TITLB/TERM Planning Commission Charlss Kslley (Chairman) 3-31-89 Rural Haureen Bellows (Vice-Chair } 3-31-89 At Large • Sara Moos 3-31-89 Rural Jim Hanson 3-31-91 At Large Edward M. Cohen 3-31-91 At Large Jeffrey Johnson 3-31-90 Urban Edward C. Brown III 3-31-90 ADDRESS 2720 White Oak Circle Long Lake# MN 55356 265 South Brown Road Long Laker MN 55356 2160 Webber Hills Road Wayzata, MN 55391 884 Dakota Avenue Long Laker MN 55356 519 N. Ferndale Road Wayzatar MN 55391 3825 Cherry Avenue Moundr MN 55364 355 N. Stubbs Bay Road Long Laker MN 55356 32289.3 H'nsctMieuT 1) TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato^^ DATS: March 22, 1989 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Interviews INTRODUCTION - Because of the difficulty in locating the names of past applicants the staff did not send out requests to previous applicants to determine their interest until the week of March 20, 1989, Because of this the interviews have been delayed from the March 27th meeting to the April 10, 1989 meeting. The staff will attempt to send out resumes on those interested individuals at least a week prior to that Council meeting. It should be noted that the notice for solicitation of other applications was placed in the Pioneer newspaper March 13th and the Wayzata Weekly News has not printed the news article. To date no new responses have been received in response to those and three oral affirmations from the Planning Commission members whose terms shall expire as of this March. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that the Council accept the information from the staff and table the interviews until the April 10, 1989 meeting. Ayes _, Nays _. 20 Marche 1989 Mayor and City Council City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Ra: Planning Commission vacancy Ladies and Gentlemen: Please accept my application fo vacancy. I have enclosed my f&. can clarify or expand upon any ot. know. ,irrent Planning Commission le for your review. If I C..5 contents, please let me My wife and I have lived in Orono for a little over a year. We chose to build our home here because of the open, natural state this city promotes and the high quality of life it represents. We are both naturalists/outdoorspeople. In fact, my wife holds a degree in Biology with an emphasis in Wildlife Research. I would hope to use my position on the Planning Commission to help protect and preserve the wildlife and habitat in this community. I am a professional Civil Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. I am involved in planning and designing residential, commercial and industrial projects for private developers. Although at times my responsibilities conflict with my personal preservation desires, I have found that with proper p^.anning and design, it is possible to find workable compromises to these situations. I can bring this skill to the Planning Commission. I believe this skill makes me uniquely qualified to help resolve the tough planning issues facing Orono in the coming years. As I see them, these will include the Highway 12 By-pass of Long Lake, and the increasing need for quality upscale homesites. Both of these issues will create demands on undeveloped areas of Orono. I look forward to having the opportunity to serve on the Planning Commission in Orono. Again, I encourage you to contact me regarding any questions you may have. Stephan M. Johnston 90?^ North Shore Drive West Mound, Minnesota 55364 472 - 8007 (Evenings) 533 - 7595 (Days) STEPHEN M. JOHNSTON 900 North Shore Drive West Orono, Minnesota 55364 (612)472-8007 QUAUFICATIONS PROFILE Proven ability to perfoim effectively ?5 a Civil Engineer in all areas of Municipal Engineering, in both the Public and Private sector. Skilled in working with government agencies and the general public. Possess good understanding of the workings and responsibilities of various aspects of municipal government Ability to work independently with little supervision. Able to delegate work effectively to others. Hold Bachelor’s Degree in Civil Engineering. Excellent verbal and wrinen communication skills. EXPERIENCE PROJECT ENGINEER (2/86 to present) Merila and Associates. Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. Hired as Design Engineer to work primarily on Commercial Industrial and Multi-family Residential projects. Promoted to Project Engineer position designing Residential Developments. Position requires supervision of designers, draftsman and inspectors. Entered below is a partial list of current and past projects: 1) Military Housing Site, Belle Fourche, SD - Housing site for 60 families 2) Anograph Commercial Building, Plymouth. MN 3) Lemay Lake Hills Townhomes. Eagan, MN - 48 Townhome sites 4) Bur Oak HiUs, Eagan, MN - 211 Residential Home sites 5) Lake Camelot Estates, Plymouth, MN -196 Single-family Home sites - 320 Multi-family Home sites 6) Park Square Shopping Center, Brooklyn Park, MN Specific Responsibilities: Preparation of: - Concept Layouts for proposed developments - Preliminary Plat Documents - Environmental Assessment worksheets - Preliminai> and Final Cost Estimates - Government Agency Permit Applications (i.e., DNR, Watershed, Army Corps., HUD/FHA, etc.) Design: - Site Grading Plans - Sanitary Sewer and Water - Storm Sewer and Detention Ponds - Streets. Parking Lots, Trails and Playground Facilities Have supervised up to 12 technicians and design engineers concurrently Computer/C,\D experience Management of projects during construction EXPERIENCE {Continued) CIVIL ENGINEER (6/81 to 2/86) City of Maple Grove, Maple Grove, Minnesota. Joined city staff as Engineering Aide to assist in project inspection and drafting. Later rcnimed as Engineering Administrative Technician and gained experience in additional areas, including: projca bonding, easement document preparation, subdivision platting requircmenLs and the preparation of developers’ agreements. Promoted to Civil Engineer. Responsibilities included: - Preparing Assessment Roles upon project completion - Reviewing Site Plans to ensure they met with Gty Standards - Granting approval on Grading and Development Plans • Designing Street and Utility Projects and seeing them through to completion - Preparing and submitting special Reports on Long-range Capital Improvement Planning - Overseeing and scheduling work for four Engineering Technicians - Establishing Procedures to minimize design/constniction problems - Preparing Traffic Studies EDUCATION BACHELOR OF CIVIL ENGINEERING (1984) University of Minnesota. Minneapolis. Emphasis on Transportation/Municipal Engineering. Completed 95% of course-work in 1982 and finished while working full-time as a Civil Engineer at the City of Maple Grove. Continuing Education includes: Inspection Pavement Design and Storm Sewer Design. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER - State of Minnesota AcrivrnES Sigma Chi Fraternity - Vice President. Social Chariman, Chapter Editor Intcr-Fratemity Council - Representative Twin City Power Boat Association - Secretary/Treasurer Minnesota Student Assembly University Senate Institute of Technology Student Board Softball, Golf, Camping REFERENCES Available upon request P2r.JKiisSf ../ ■^:':•* V tOUKTt Planning CoMilaalon Intetvlewa TTtsciwwwrija- e c * '‘ ^iV...A;V/ K * • . 41S88.2 Mayor and City Council Mark Barnhardaon, City Adainlatrato April 15, 1988 0CGiiriCiL hiuTING APR 2 51988 CfTV OF ORONO Latttra of intent a). Sara Hooa Pobert L. Minkena Stephen M. Jcnnetfm Dale A. Chrlat»na«r> Letter Kelley Curt la Quady Propoaed Queatlonalre Current Planning Coir^ltalon Meabera Ordinance 2.SI (aa amended by Ordinance 31, Second Serlea Conducting Intervlewa of inteceated candldatea for the recency on the Planning coeinlaalon. laaue 2. Selecting an individual to fill the vacancy created by the'realgnatlon of Paul "aylor. laaue 3. Review of dealgnatlone aee if r«reona O’rrently or the'plonnlng Coianlaalon need to have d«jignatlona changed In order to meet the n il-‘<*1 ines aetfotth in .\ttachment D. XirrRODUCTXOM - with r.’c? ea-jjnatlon of ?<iul Taylor, who haa been a rural'repreaentatl ve on the Planning ' oinmiaalon, the City ataff waa directed to adver*^Me In the paper together with tending lettera to tvioee «h^ year had Indicated an Intereat In the Planning Connleaiop . ^<>tt)ai 'Ith Park Commlaalon meobars. Additionally aa novvt in Attac^ament D the Council had adopted an ordinance for the appojntme.it of Plar-'ing >'ommlsalon that related not only to "Rural" (2), "At ’ : ^e* (2) and "Urban" (■!' dealgna.; lone but alao to "Lake" « (1). C rently t only "Urban" repreaentatlve la Jeft : ion. DISCUSStOM - l^iaue 1. - interview Intereat. ■chrent 3 It sopapded to ovlde a format for the c* the Jatea who have indicated an Taeue 2. need tt- only ^il, following Intervlewa, will for Planning Commlaalon baaed not itation hut alao the nceda aa they W ^ ^ ‘ / ■ \.r ^.... • C'-' / ■.•.d ■' 5!5.■«•'<> >- rf! L- is. < •< *^>... '. ’ r*l«t* to th* guld»lin«s for repr•••ntatIof ■•ctort of Orono. - .7^ 216f Ifobbor RilXi Rd 32M Baytido Road 9fft North Short ort Wti 2750 Caaco Point Road 2135 Colin Drlvt 1223 Brown Road South l!§!!9 It • ?*!^9!}§£iON " Ttchnieally nona Planning CoMrralilon'iii&tra art laktahort ownt: that tht Individual dtalrtd ia frow an *Orban' ■ay ehoott to rt-dtalgnatt ont of tht thrtt *Rt all of whoa art in tht *Rural* arta to achitvt dttl^nation. Stltetion of a "Rural* dtalgntt Cowaitaion with Ita prtatnt eoapoaition of •Rural* and 1 *Drban*. ALTBRNRTXVES - l!9^* it “ la Conduct and concludt tht Inttrvltwi 2a Contlnut tht Inttrvitw for a lattr j^aaut 2. Stltetion - Ar“SaRi"i~atltctlon following conplttlu Ba Tablt atltctlon until tht Hay 9th at Ca Tablt until another ntttln^j Da Aak for furthtr applleatlona laaut 3^ Rtdtaignation A. 5tVig~nitV currant atnbtra aa ni atltctlon tonight Ba Tablt to dtttraint if it will bt rtq atltctlon at a aubttqutnt attting MMENDATXON - Xt it r&^oamtndtd that followli ^V^uncll tablt any atltctlon until tht H ■ pointnent at tithtr thla ntetlng or tht n< . havt rn appointntnt in pi act by tht Plani H«y 16th Planning Conn aaion ntttlnrj. (Tht ti achtdultd for tht 2nd will not nted to taka p Council dtftr any rtdtaignation until auch tint ■adt. PROPOSED NOTION - Novtd by , atconded by , following tht inttrvltwa table atltctlon of a“ca> Hay 9* 1900 Council ntttii'ig. Aytt » Nays *•» F -r rI >V- « ** ■-y • .*» I ^ -a •*■ . . .r •; - a 4589.2 ! 7^ cou^'cii Muting ;.fhlO'3- '; CITV OF 0R0«0 TOs Mayor and City Council FRON: Mark E. Bernhatdson, City Administrat DATS: April 5, 1989 SIJBJBCTx Planning Conunission/Council Joint Meeting Attachment: A* Planning Commission/Council Joint Meeting Memo Dated 4/5/89 ISSUE - 1. Selection of a date by Council for a joint meeting. 2. Direction as to desired agenda topics. INTRODUCTION - At the joint meeting of Febuary 6, 1989, Council indicated a desire for a future joint meeting. DISCUSSION - Issue 1. - Date Presently a joint meeting has been set for Saturday July 29, 1989. Earlier dates could-include Monday, May 1, 1989 Wednesday, May 3, 1989 Thursday, May 4, 1989 Tuesday, May 9, 1989 Wednesday, May 10, 1989 Tuesday, May 23, 1989 Wednesday, May 24, 1989 Thursday, May 25, 1989 In Attachment A Jeanne Mabusth has outlined possible topics for discussion at each meeting. ALTERNATIVES Issue 1. - Date 1. Select a date to be confirmed with Planning Commission. 2. Delay date until appointments completed. 3. Utilize the July 29, 1989 meeting. 4. Table for further discussion. Issue 2. - Topics 1. Select desired topics. 2. Table for futher discussion. 3, Indicate desired topics individually to staff prior to the meeting. 4. Take no action. RECOMMENDATION - That Council select 5/4/89 as a date for the joint meeting if appointments made by 4/24 and that desired topics for the meeting be communicated prior to 4/24 Council meeting so that they can be finaled at that meeting. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by secon^’^d by _, that Council selects 5/4/89 as the joint meeting of Planning Commission and Council and that CounciImembers communicate desired topics to staff prior to the Council's April 24, 1989, meeting so that the agenda for the joint meeting can be finaled by Council. Ayes _, Nays ^TTfiCiiMeuX ATos Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Froas Jeanne A. Mabusth# Building & Zoning Administrator Date: April 5, 1989 Subject: Planning Conunission/Council Joint Meeting List of Exhibits - Exhibit A - Agenda of 2/6/89 Exhibit B - Bernhardson*s Memo of 2/14/89 Exhibit C - May Calendar At the February 6th joint meeting. Council requested that a second meeting be scheduled prior to the joint meeting of Saturday, July 29, It was agreed that the second meeting be scheduled sometime in early to mid spring. The calendar month of May has been enclosed with the dates highlighted to denote no conflict with previous scheduled City meetings. Staff would suggest that 2 or 3 dates be selected by the Council as available options for consideration by the Planning Commission at their meeting of April 17th. By April 18th staff should be able to confirm the second joint meeting for the Council. Agenda for May Joint Meeting Certain members of the Council have noted that it may be more appropriate for the Council to select the items for discussion. The "2 item" agenda drafted by staff apparently failed to attain the original goal of the joint meeting, which was to provide open, friendly, intelligent discussion regarding the roles of both the Council^ and the Planning Commission. In review of the February 6th agenda. Exhibit A, staff would ask that the Marina licensing item be re-scheduled for discussion at the May meeting. You may wish to provide Council with a copy of your memo dated 2/14/89, Exhibit B, that reviewed many of the topics and issues raised at the February 6th meeting. It would certainly be a benefit the Planning Commission if an update or status report can be given on the following issues: 1. County Road 116. 2. Future Highway 12 3. Progress of facilities evaluations. 4. Navarre redevelopment. 5. Extension of water/sewer within the Highway IT corridor. 6. Annexation. Please advise how you wish to proceed with drafting the agenda for the joint meeting. /f CITY OF ORONO JOINT MBBTIH6 CITY oxmciL AND PLANNING COHMISSION 7:00 P.M. Monday, February 6, 1989 City Council Chambers 1. Council/Planning Commission Roles and Responsibilities (Memo enclosed) 2. Marina Licensing (Memo previously sent under separate cover) Attachments: A. ) Planning Commission Roles/Responsibilities Memo Dated 1/31/89 B. ) Marina Licensing Memo Dated 1/27/89 cc: Department Heads 21489.2 6 TO: Mayor and City Council FSOM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrate DATS: February 14, 1989 SUBJECT: Joint Council/Planning Commission of February 6, 1989 Attachment: A. Planning Commissicn Minutes Excerpt 2/17/89 At the joint Council/Planning Commission of February 6, 1989, the Planning Commission members raised a number of issues that were of concern to them. Below is an attempted summary of those issues with response to the major it^^ms, I, P 1 annj.ng_Commi ss ion Information - The Pl**.nning Commission "”<Tutl ined a number of issues related to information provided to them in advance of the Planning Commission. These included: a. Completeness of information b. Level of information (too much verbage) c. Recommendations d. Initial communication of upcoming applications e. Information sheets outi.ining the basics f. Receiving the information only two to three days in advance. These issues have been reviewed by the Building and Zoning staff and myself and commencing with this Planning Commission they will transmit a copy of the legal notices together with a sketch of each of the applications to the Planning Commission two weeks prior to that meeting. In addition the staff will continue to try to get the bulk of the information to the Planning Commission members by delivery on Wednesday with the follow up delivery on Friday. A review by the staff indicated everyone should have the bulk of the information four to five days in advance of the Planning Commission meeting. In a review of previous Planning Commission meetings there are only a few applications in the last year that have been delayed because of lack of information. For the most part those were items that were delayed as a result of changes the applicant desired during the review process and which staff attempted to accommodate in a timely manner. II. Comprehensive Plan #2 - Highway 12 - The Planning ComxniYsioa rai^e<r a number o£ issues related to this including: a. Dislike of the process b. Piecemeal report c. Complaints about the author d. Persons not listened to during the review process e. Peeling that issues that came up in the Rebers application should have been resolved in the Comprehensive Plan process f. A feeling that the Planning Commission had been bypassed in the process g. The fact that the actual process for Rebers was a combination of existing ordinance authority, which was allowed in Rebers* case but for which no alternate provision is available for non-residential development. (Left unaddressed may have been some issues related to the proposed amendment for planned developments which were not specifically addressed by any of the Planning Commission members, but may have been alluded to by them.) The Highway 12 process was commenced under a different Planning Commission and Council in 1985. It attempted to get input from the people present as to the process to be undertaken including the way the process was conducted. Once the initial work of the study was over the draft document was actually prepared by staff (not the consultant) for presentation to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission reviewed that draft and did go through area by area as to what they wanted on each of the properties. There is no comment regarding the quality of the draft during the review in any of the minutes or in the recollection of staff. The review of the Planning Commission recommendations together with those of the Council'and what was submitted to the Metro Council indicate only one change from the original Planning Commission recommendation. This change entailed the northeast quarter of the property between Willow/Old Crystal Bay and Highway 12 and County Road Six. The Planning Commission had recommended that it not be sewered and the Council based on additional information concerning the marginal soils, allowed that area to be included within the MUSA line, however, retaining it at a two acre density. With that one exception documented, the recommendations given by Planning Commission were identical to those eventually approved by the Metro Council and adopted by the City. It must be remembered that the planning document is a comprehensive plan amendment and as such is drafted to meet the requirements of the Metro Council based on issues they desire to be addressed. In addition there were areas where definitive positions and proposals were not included to provide greater flexibility for the City and the developer to come in with a specific proposal at the time of development. The intent of the Comprehensive Plan is not to eliminate all the issues related to a development but take into account the major issues for which the Metro Council is concerned. III. Planning Commission Roles and Responsibilities - The Planning Commission spokesperson indicated two specific areas of concern: a. No time to allow for planning. b. No authority to decide in the case of variances. The intent of the meeting was specifically to find ways to assist the Planning Commission to do longer range planning together with determining if there were appropriate ways that were agreeable to Council to expand the Planning Commission's authority. The apparent tenor of the meeting indicated that the Planning Commission did not interpret what was being proposed in this light, and felt it was being proposed as a means to take away the little responsibility that they have. IV. Rebers' Subdivision - A couple of issues mentioned in this area included the fact that the Planning Commission felt that the presentation at one meeting of the preliminary subdivision application was confusing as to whether John Shardlow was an advocate for the developer or the City. Additionally it was the fee"* ing that the whole process on Rebers' was muddled by threat of annexation. Response - A review of the documents specifically shows that John Shardlow was representing the City at the sketch plan review and the first public hearing for rezoning and subdivision although he happened to sit next to the developer the night of the Planning Commission consideration of the initial rezoning subdivision because other’chairs in the Council room were occupied. He introduced the application as would City staff. The issue was raised by Mr. Shardlow at the time that it happened and staff expected it to have been an issue of short term duration. As for the issue of annexation, the Planning Commission reviewed the initial Comprehensive Plan in February/March timeframe of 1987. The Council began their consideration through the March/April timeframe and during this period Long Lake indicated their desire to annex all the property on the north side of Highway 12. This was reiterated in a letter to the City of Long Lake of June *87, during the Council's review of the amendment process and prior to their final vote for submission to Metro Council. This was very visible as * letters were presented at the public meetings at which at le<.^ a couple of the Planning Commission members were present as representatives. V. Communications - In this area comments included: - The general comment that there was a breakdown in communication. "Us verses Them" A feeling of: A lack of understanding as to the Council's support of the rural character of Orono but more to the point "what is the Counci's planning philosophy for the city. Responses - Unfortunately, communications are in the eyes of the behold^ and the intent of the meeting was to improve communications in a positive manner. To date the effect has been just the opposite. As for the issue of "Rural Character , it should be noted that a majority of the current residents in the community live in or around Lake Minnetonka on lots that are substantially below two acres. The "Rural Character" probably entails approximately 1/3 of the sites in Orono. The development of the "Rural Charater" was a function or the desire of the people who lived on Lake Minnetonka to protect the lake from non point source pollution and came about as a result and not the primary goal of the Comprehensive Plan for the major area left undeveloped that remained to be developed. IV. Other Related Issues - Three other issues were raised which include: County Road 116 Future Highway 12 Executive sessions Response - The utilization of County Road 116 as a minor arterial is outlined in the City's Comprehensive Plan and has been on the City's MSA system since its development. Whether this is a minor arterial under Orono or County jurisdiction it is more appropriately an issue for the City Council than a planning issue for Planning Commission review as its status has already been determined. As for the future of Highway 12 it is anticipated that once a corridor selection process is undertaken, Planning Commissioners and Council together with other interested parties would be involved in that process to address particular land use concerns. It should be noted that the Planning Commission ‘'as not traditionally been involved in transportation planning ^es. As far as the executive sessions are concerned their content is not apprporaitely discussed publicly but Planning Commission may not be aware that the scope the Council can utilize in conducting them is limited to the following issues: A. Land acquision discussions. B. Pending or current litigation. C. Labor relations contract discussions. The Council has been very diligent in limiting their use of executive sessions and does not use or encourage excessive discussion for these items. cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator NINOTBS OF THB PIAimiliG COMMISSION MEETING HELD FBBROARY 17, 1987 fllOS McGOWEB COHTIMUBD It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Chairman Kelley, toiVTt:u:r°vA /y7„r th'e ?Sn itt, existing driveway to determine what measures need to be taxen for proper placement on Lot A (staff to approve location). Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. CONPRZHERSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, HO. 2 - CONTINOATZON OF PUBLIC BEARING Consultant Planner John Shardlow was present for this matter. City Administrator Pernhardson explained that the Comprehensive Plan document presented is the culmination Corridor Study which started in -eptember 1985. The document implements the changes to the comprehensive plan and will be presented to the Metropolitan Council with the appropriate application ^n order that the tity may have the appropriate MUSA line extension approved by the Metro Council together with reviews by Met Council of significant regional systems. This planning document will also be used as development takes place within the corridor. He reviewed the following final items for Planning Commission to conceptually review and make their reconjmendations: A. North Brown Road Alternatives B. Area 4 - Sid Rebers Property C. Area E - Requirement to Extend Municipal Services Request from Clci (Busy Beaver Day Care Center) to connect the new facility to the the Long Lake City Water ( Sewer System. ' D. Engineer's Report - Concerning existing capacity of Long Lake water system and impact of proposed Orono use at 600 sewer unit level. E. Eisenger - Written request to withdraw request for sower for consideration with the current Comprehensive Plan Amendment. P. Further discussion of Areas 1,2,3, and 5. Lake City Engineer, was present and made the following comments! 1. Regarding the traffic plan. Long Lake is opposed to any option that closes North Brown Road. 2. Regarding a sour'i frontage road from Willow Drive to Daniel St., there is concern about the traffic on Daniel Street. 3. Regarding the water issue - Long Mke will review requests to hook up to its water system with consideration of demand and if Long Lake can support the system. KXVOTBS OF THB PLAMHWG COMNISSIOH HEBTZIIG HBLO FBBROARy 37# 1987 COMPUimSXVS FLAM AMEHDNEUT CONTXHUBO4. Regarding Sanitary Sewer service problems# the 600 units is a concern noting that there may be additional capacity in the inte? .<iptor line. He noted that the City of Long Lake would like to be kept involved in this planning procedure. ;i'' .-.T John Shardlow noted that when the Metropolitan Council reviews the MUSA line# a public hearing will be held for the communities involved by the Council. Rodger Sense of the State Bank of Long Lake requested that the City consider them in negotiations regarding the future of North Brown Road since this is an integral part of access to the bank as well as to downto\<r shopping area of Long Lake. Marshall Levin of Pope Associates Architects voiced concern regarding the number of sewer units allocated to Area 3. Chairman Kelley noted that the 500 sewer units has always been an issue of negotiation with Long Lake and Medina, in which Orono cannot simply take these units. Dave Willits, 1900 West Farm Road, commented that he is a new resident who moved to Orono because of the 2 acre rural area requirements and feels there ar e many residents who are willing to pay the price to live in rural Orono who are not in favor of the proposed changes. Referring to the Corridrr Study map# Chairman Kelley noted that there are no changes proposed in Areas A-E in which he Is in agreement with. He asked the other Planning Commission members their feelings regarding Areas A-S. Taylor stated he felt comfortable with them continuing in their present state subject to the minor ”**^*^^Aroa'^^A"- tho^previously approved use other than residential. Area E - Finding the Cici request for sewer and water reasonable. Chairman Kelley stated that he would be opposed to requests in Area E# but due to the need for a sprinkler system In the day care center# he approves of the request for water. hanaon would incorp line. dte Area E in the area MU8A or «K CC«ISSIOH «B*I« BBU. 19«7 lO^nss or th* ---------------- CC»IW»B>8IV. nM ^;'~bnnc!ua!rin t‘h« MoVa \lll Bogardlnq Are. I -hi'h i» ;5Sp.%br^n«» «. .1*, Ballows stated that nol^has concerns Kelley and 394 extension westward. •*•1 MnDoT ’s future plans'B iuvw*« r— the th. £r.^.y £ro» W«/«t. to .rr..‘V.v'r, i.l.n.ang -c^-Mil.gtoJl reromi.end.tto n^ no ch.ng.. opinion. ..rvtce road be residentia1• m ^ I MZVOTES OF THE PIAlfMZNG OONMISSZOM MEETING HELD lEBROARY 17, 1987 COMPSBHEBSZVB PLAN ^JIENDMENT CONTINUED Bellows asked if the property north of the wetland % could support septics systems within a 2-acre rural residential area. . ■ -■ • . S- . . - >■ Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron felt that some a^eas would not be able.to support a septic system, which is one good reason to zone the area as PRD (Planned Residential District). Planning Commission recommendation- Area south of wetland designated cornmercTaT ? non-single familv residential sewered area. Area north of wetland designated single famiJy residential with no sewer on the eastern half noting that thore may be septic problems where a solution may be clustering. Amend cosip plan to address housing excluding any economic implications. Regarding Areas 4 4 5, Chairman Kelley is ir favor of an east/west road connection. Be ^s also in favor of Area 5 connecting to the MUSA line. Planning Commission concurred with Chairman Kelley's opinion regarding the connection. Planning Commission recommended that a buffer of berraing and plantings be included on the North of Area 5 adjacent Dickey Lake Drive. Plannlhg Commission recommended that the road connection issue be left open for future options. Regarding expanding the boundaries of the 9-1 area and sewered areai Chairman Kelley stated that, given the fact *hat numerous trees may be lost in order to provide septic systems, he felt it should be sewered. Cohen stated he would sewered area back 150*. acre minimum lot sizes. be open to expanding the He felt strongly about 7- Bellows stated that loss of trees should not be issue, however, she is not necessarily oppos.d <io sewer in this area and felt there has been a reasonable request for Cv'wor by Mr. Rebers. She feels tha whole p&*ce) should be included in the MUSA line and not lii<ited io 2-a-r*: lots. Hanson concurred with Bellows. ' ■ -f ■ ”***^ " *“ K««I»C CeWtISSIOII lOBTIBG HBLD FBBBDUY X7. I,,, COWlktn«SlVB PUUi ANBaOMBBT COaTIHUBD that\°and*2\cM niV’L*a*go«^j ’c“^‘* be. aewared and Biix IS a good compromise. Included fn”the*Molft^rn”"and*B^r"' *rea 4 be §o»V.?i"on*;^VcUrn5ftL^*\„"^^ ?'>'>«•«> to Planning abound bu r.aidentia 1 2-acr.^o*t%‘Vit‘i?“ -^i\% lnportant®that*a*trail*8ystem*’ba'^d"" **Hey *«lt it between tb. school* into iL, taJe* o« ^J^Vay" 12*;"’ pubUc"“earing 21^“closed?the recoaunend approv^T^Vcomorah •®®‘’"<led by Cohan> to including the JicSLendad'^^^^^^^^ *■**? *“^d.»nt tli. 2 atated. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays j_^^^^®*tion* previously 11080 cm or ottoao HOAD COMnNUATlOM OF PUBLIC BBARIHG ~2t;2,\"h"iVoV»v;“a;pritrt'’ «th. ia.tthat the original rezonfno McDowell, was advised Bodifled to include onl ’y ?hi^ /ri°" "ould have to be properties within 1,000 feet 2f th« w*** ’'“'flous Minnetonka. The application las*a"*Mr. McDowell the additional a*' order to give and evaluate the effects on hi*^*V *^^^*'* Position Since that meeting Mr. McOowli/ <>ovelopment. interest in the current ^ released all by staff. Because of the *• rezone this property, proJidino thi b«h f controls i.e. hi.rdcover etc th2 ucommends pursuing the ann^Vr. ^*1® Orono staffsreas involved. application, she reviewed the sewer in'^that ar" a definite plans for determine if sewer is needed ^Ld progress to would happen would be two yt'ars fitn now. * it ‘ : \ ; . > 'K ''" v>/ • u, . . a ’il W.C^: ■'^m &m'■ li(til r M ? IIIE I ■ '1. i jl ii'lir'* Pi 1'''^^ I jffl r 'i'k' [;m|3 ItIm : ■ I . ^^r■'!;r. 'aTiR'MiV) iit: 1989^ il^ mw F 5 s 6 W T |<^26 27 ucc,-tv^%a mim/■>• .V: -.v . -., I. ',»'. • %*» .'• *1 ! I /-• • .Vi?’V:- •;:•>■ !• : v;.‘*‘V\ ’ -i* *• ; ’ >.*i / t'- • vi W§ ili- :!ei- .: IK ■!’'':?.:. ^ ii.^ Miitelfi 4589.3 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato DATS: April 5, 1989 // -•rv Qc n£:n:|;} SUBJECT: Lake Minnetonka Management Plan Subcommittee Membership Attachment: A. *jMCD Letter Dated 3/27/89 Received 4/3/89 ISSUE - Determination as to persons who would desire to serve on selected subcommittees developing the Comprehensive Management Plan for the LMCD. INTRODUCTION - As noted in the attached letter, LMCD*s consultant is seeking members for their committees on: Lake Use Lake Access On-Shore Related Facilities Wetlands Unfortunately some of these committees will have initial meeting the week the letter was received. Jeanne Mabusth together with assistance from CounciImember Goetten has been on the Land Use Subcommittee developing ^he shoreland regulations. Lt. Cheswick and Chief Kilbo have been alternating on the Public Safety Subcommittee. ALTERNATIVES 1. Council members indicate areas they may desire to serve. 2. Direct staff to provide any selected committee(s). 3. Nominate othe representatives for the City. 4. Combination. 5. Table for further discussion. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that Council indicate any comroTttees on which they would desire to serve and at a minimum the City have a representative on Lake Access. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by __, seconded by __, that the Orono Council appoints _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ to represent the City on_ _ _ _ _ _ committee. Ayes _, Nays _. 4589.3 // TO* Mayor and City Council PBOH: Mark E* Bernhardson, City Administrato DATS: April 5, 1989 SUBJECT: Lake Minnetonka Management Plan Subcommittee Membership C^iNCiL CiTY OF Of?n:^C Attachment: A. LMCD Letter Dated 3/27/89 Received 4/3/89 ISSUE -> Determination as to persons who would desire to serve on selected subcommittees developing the Comprehensive Management Plan for the LMCD. INTRODUCTION - As noted in the attached letter, LMCD*s consultant is seeking members for their committees on: Lake Use Lake Access On-Shore Related Facilities Wetlands Unfortunately some of these committees will have initial meeting the week the letter was received. Jeanne Mabusth together 'with assistance from Councilmember Goetten has been on the Land Use Subcommittee developing ^he shoreland regulations. Lt. Cheswick and Chief Kilbo have been alternating on the Public Safety Subcommittee. ALTERNATIVES 1. Council members indicate areas they may desire to serve. 2. Direct staff to provide any selected committee(s). 3. Nominate othe representatives for the City. 4. Combination. 5. Table for further discussion. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that Council indicate any committees on which they would desire to serve and at a minimum the City have a representative on Lake Access. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by __, seconded by __, that the Orono Council appoints to represent the City on __ _ _ _ _ _ committee. Ayes _, Nays _. Hon. James Graybek Mayor, Orono 3050 Jamestown Rd Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 March 27. 1989 Re: Lake Minnetonka Management Plan Formation of Additional Subcommittees Dear Hon. Graybek: During April we will be forming four new subcommittees to assist in formulating the Management Plan for Lake Minnetonka, '’ome of these subcommittees will address the central issues involved in managing Lake Minnetonka. We believe that representatives of your community should be involved. The subcommittees that will be active in April are: Lake Use Lake Access On-shore related facilities Wetlands Lake Use Involves protection and enhancement of recreational activities on the lake in the summer and winter.’ That means that we will be considering which activities to allow on the lake as well as the equipment that will be permitted. We will also examine the use of the lake's surface for private and multiple docks as well as marinas. Lake Access examines access to the lake for water- and shore-based recreation; not only boating but also picnicking, swimming and sunbathing. We will be examining the existing use of public lands on the lake as well as making recommendations for future use. This will be one of the subcommittees that will examine the potential for user fees on the lake. On-shore related facilities examines the development and enhancement of public and private recreation facilities, e.g., vistas, fishing piers, public parks, picnic areas, marinas and yacht clubs. If you have public lands that are used for park purposes, or not used for park purposes, you community has an interest in the work of this subcommittee. We invite your participation in these subcommittees. You should select the most qualified staff, couficil member or other person to represent your community in developing goals and objectives in each of these areas. We have attached additional descriptions of the work of these subcommittees and some of the is.sues that we will be directing. For more information about these topics, read the applicable parts of "Scope of Work, Management Plan for Lake Minnetonka" which was sent to your city by the LMCD over the last two years. April Subcommittee Formation Page 2 March 27, 1989 Should you have questions, do not hesitate to contact your LMCD representative or: David J. Amdorfer, Ph. D. Amdorfer Associates, Inc. 472-2555 Mr. Gene Strommen Executive Director, LMCD 473-7033 Thank you for your interest in the Management Plan; we look forward to your contribution. Sincerely, ARNDORFER ASSOCIATES, INC. David J. Amdorfer, Ph. D, President DJA:me cc: LMCD representative City Manager/Administrator LAKE USE SUBCOMMITTEE The Lake Use bcommittee will examine means of protecting and enhancing recreation act./ities on the lake in both summer and winter. As presently conceived, the subcommittee will meet six times between April and August. The topics that will be discussed include: Review of existing recreational use oatA Winter use Zoning the lake for controls on recreational activity Zoning the lake for controls on use of the surface, e.g., marinas, multiple and private docks Density standards for the lake The first meeting will be during the week of April 3>7. evening meetings are planned. A mixture of day and LAKE ACCESS SUBCOMMITTEE The Lake Access Subcommittee will review methods of protecting and enhancing recreational access to the lake by shoreline residents, lakeshore community residents and the general public. Tt;e work includes access for boating, picnicking, swimming, sunbathing and shore fishing. We will also be reviewing the quality of boat access to the lake as well as the quantity of parking spaces that are provided for car/trailer combinations. If there are to be controls on access to the lake for any user group, it will be this subcommittee that will examine and establish the need for such controls. The potential for a user fee will be examined in part in this subcommittee and in part in the Funding Subcommittee (to be formed later). The first meeting will be the week of April 24-28. planned between April and September. A total of six meetings are ON-SHORE RELATED FACILITIES On-shore related facilities include all recreation-related facilities on and near the lake. These Include vistas, fishing areas, parks, and other public lands used for recreation. We will also examine other public lands on the lake to determine their potential for development to public use. There will be two meetings, one in April and one in May. will be held the week of April 24-28. The first meeting WETLANDS The Wetlands Subcommittee> will examine protection and enhancement of wetlands below 929.6. The subcommittee will recommend wetlands for protection from development or Infringement as well as studies needed to develop a comprehensive wetlands protection plan. There will be two meetings during April. The first meeting will be held Friday, April 7th at 1:00 pm at the Police Conference Room in the lower level of Minnetonka City Hall. 33189.2 TO: FROM: DATS: Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat March 31, 1989 II'A SUBJECT: County Road 51 Attachment:A. County Road 51 Memo Dated February 16, 1989 (Without Attachments) B. 1988 Annual Report: Public Water Areas ISSUES - Provision of information to Council regarding potential DNR reaction to entire banning of parking along County Road 51. INTRODUCTION - At the Council's February 27, 1989 they requested the staff explore the potential reactions the DNR may have should the Council request no parking along the entire stretch of County Road 51. DISCUSSION - Both Mr. David Singer and myself have spoken with the DNR on this subject and the issue falls into the following areas: PRIORITY - Currently the Department of Natural Resources is slatted to begin exploring a public access on the south shore in Excelsior in 1990. They have concentrated most of their efforts off the lake the last couple years but coupled with Lake Minnetonka being about the only area in the Metro left for access Improvement they will be focusing more and more on that in coming years. REDUCTION IN PARKING - To the extent that there is a reduction, even in uncommitted slots, this may change the priority that the Department of Natural Resources has placed on Lake Minnetonka and where they may focus their efforts. Should there be a substantial reduction (in this case up to 28 slots) they will probably be under substantial pressure from particularly sport fishing groups to increase the number of parking slots along this area. As such, they will then look to see where they can place additional parking within 1,500 feet (it should be noted that back in 1984, *85 and '86 when this was first considered there were some vacant/tax forfeited parcels in the area that may have been amenable to development of additional parking.) Absent the ability to develop additional parking in this area may necessitate undertaking acquisition of a new access in the zone. FUNDING - Currently the amount of funding the DNR has for access acquisition is somewhat limited and may restrict them to a number of years over which they would have to acquire properties to substantially increase parking in the area. That does not however mean that this money could not be substantially increased particularly i£ there is pressure on the Legislature to expand the available funding for this venture together with extention of eminent domain legislation as witnessed in the Hennepin Park/Minnetrista issue. SAFETY - It should be noted that Hennepin County has not specifically said it is an unsafe situation in any correspondence and they do have other areas that are more conjested but that the proposed solutions could address the neighbors concerns. DNR would look at the safety issue and pronouncements of the County as to the necessity to removed parking spots. POLICY - A. Eliminate all parking. B. Widen the shoulder to 10 feet and provide for double stripped fog line and curbing to encourage people to park away from the traveled portion of the road. C. Removal of up to six slots intermittently along there to allow crossing points. D. Removal of four parking slots on the curve to improve the site lines further down the curve. Although no widening or double stripping would be undertaken. E. The City Council put the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District on notice that it will request the County posting of "Mo Parking" in additional areas where there maybe safety concerns County 51 east of the bridge six months after the Comprehensive Plan Lake Access element has been concluded. F. Locate alternative areas of acceptable off-street parking as subsititues. ACTION A. Select one or a conbination. B. Take no action. C. Include comments and any amendments that would be desired. D. Table for further discussion. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council undertake for the interim Option 1 which would eliminate 4 slots on the curve together with putting Lake Minnetonka Conservation District on notice that the City will be asking for additional removals where there maybe continued safety concerns in the future and that this should be included in their Comprehensive Management Plan process. cc: David Singer,3520 North Shore Drive, Wayzata Dennis Hanson, Hennepin County JoEllen Hurr, LMCD Representative L.M.C.D. 21689.1 TO: Mayor and City Council FBOM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrate DATS: February 16, 1989 SUBJECT: County Road 51 Attachment: A. County Road 51 Memo Dated 2/10/89 (No Attachment) B. County Road 51 Memo Dated 11/30/88 C. Letter to Residents Date^ 2/21/89 HtcnDT A ISSOE - 1. Determination if any of the proposed solutions can address the safety concerns of the residents. 2. Selection of a means to address those concerns. INTRODUCTION - When this issue was raised again last fall, Hennepin County developed three alternatives to address the problem and in response to Mr. David Singer’s issue related to site distances on the curves developed amother alternative which would be a variation on on^ of the first three. DISCUSSION - A review of Attachments A and B indicate the necessary Issues related to this item. ALTERNATIVES - 1. POLICY ALTERNATIVES A. Eliminate all parking. B. Widen the shoulder to 10 feet and provide for double striped fog line and curbing to encourage people to park away from the traveled portion of the road. C. Removal of up to six parking spots along this route to allow for clear pedestrians zones. D. Variation on B in which four slots would be removed around the curve to improve site distances for other pedestrians walking between cars further aloiig the route. 2. ACTION A. Adopt a selected method for addressing the problems. B. Determine other alternatives. C. Table for further discussion. D. Take no action. RECOMMENDATION - In conjunction with the work that is being done by Metro Waste Control it would be appropriate that the shoulder be widened and that the four parking spots along the curve be eiliminated with no replacements spots at this time. In addition staff would recommend the utilization of an access dock off the City's fire access during the summer for loading and unloading of people to limit the trespassing on private docks and that the issue of the speed limit be undertaken once construction is completed. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that the Council request the County to have the shoulder widened in conjunction with the project work on County Road 51 together with curbing and double striping and that staff is directed to establish a make ready dock off its fire lane access and that the necessary speed limit request be made following construction. Ayes __, Nays __. cc: Pat Murphy, Hennepin County Dennis Hanson, Hennepin County David Singer, 3520 North Shore Drive, Wayzata /frrAQimenjT METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ««« am Ce«n. m Ens, m . '“g, January 6, 1989 Dear Local Official: The enclosed 1988 Annual Report; Public Water Access on Twin Cities Metropoli tan Area Lakes and Rivers was approved on Nov. 28, 1988 bv nr the Metropolitan Council, Department of Natural Resources and Department of Trade and Economic Development. A draft report was submitted to you for review/comment in late October. The adopted report Includes a 1989 work program that describes tasks and responsible staff persona for carrying out the work of the Metropolitan Water Access Connittee (see pages 8-11). it also Includes a two-year capital Improvement program for water access projects for the Department of Natural Resources and Metropolitan Council subject to legislative appropriations (see pages 12-13). If you have questions about the work program, please contact the chairperson of the appropriate advisory group. Questions regarding the DNR capital improve ment program should be directed to Delos Barber at 296-3572. Questions regarding the Metropolitan Council capital improvement program should bo directed to Jack Mauritz at 291-6602. % . Sincerely, Ame Stefforud, Parka Planner (291-6360) AS:emp Enclosure £>5.-(os 1 APPENDIX A TWO-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES WATER ACCESS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The following projects will be funded from the Water Recreation Account, a dedicated account funded by a portion of the gas tax, boat license receipts and depending on legislative appropriations. The projects listed indicate funding needed. Completion of some projects is also dependent on timely acquisition and establishment of cooperative agreements with local units of governments. The DNR uses this list of projects as a guideline for aoquisition/development priorities. Unique problems/opportunities may arise to cause the DNR to change its priorities. Table 1 Proposed FY 1990 Projects (1989 Calendar Year) Acquire Site 2, Waconia (Carver County); searching. Acquire Site 2, Lower Prior (Scott County); searching. Acquire Site 2, St. Croix River (Washington County); in process. Acquire general fourth priority lakes: Upper Twin (Hennepin), Bass (Hennepin), Pine Tree (Washington). Acquire general small lakes: Fawn (Anoka)'*plus one other lake. Upgrade Piersons (Carver County). Upgrade Misslssippi/Crow (Hennepin County). Upgrade Spring (Scott County). Develop Site 1, Lower Prior (Scott County). Expand Site 1, Upper Prior (Scott County). Develop general sutall lakes (three co-op projects). Install two fishing piers. Acquire/develop Turtle Lake (Ramsey County), a cooperative project with Ramsey County and the r^ty of Shoreview (funded ir FY 1989). $950,000 Totel FY 90 Estimated Costs Proposed FY 1991 Projects (1990 Calendar Year)1,4 Acquire Site 2, Lake Minnetonka (Hennepin); searching. ^ Acquire Site 2, White Bear Lake (Ramsey); searching. Acquire Site 1, Little Carnelian (Washington). Acquire general fourth priority lakes: Pine Tree (Washington), Miller (Carver). Squire access sites for small lakes (under 100 acres). Develop Site 2, Waconia (Carver). Develop Site 2, St. Croix River (Washington). Develop general fourth priority lake. Develop general small lakes (three co-op projects). Develop Site 1, Mississippi River (co-op project). Upgrade Typo (Anoka County). Install four fishing piers. $1»234,000 Total FY 1991 Estimated Costs -12- Tbs Proa: Date: Subject: ATTA( Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato April 5, 1989 County Road 116 ITS - 4589.IHD A - County Road 116 Dated 2/15/89 B - Tad Jude Letter Dated 3/28/89 C - City of Medina Resolution Dated 3/7/89 ISSUE - Jetermination as to what course of action the City desires to under^ake on Willow Drive from its north portion down to Highway 12 should Coun?construct County Road 116 in Medina. INTRODUCTION - At the Council's February 13 ^ 1989 meeting they adopted a resolution in opposition to the construction of County Road 116. As a follow-up to that, the Council at its February 27th meeting undertook further consideration of the matter as to what the City of Orono should do should County Road 116 be constructed regardless of the City's position on the matter. Commissioner Tad Jude was present at the meeting at which several questions were posed to him. DISCUSSION - As noted in Attachment B, Commissioner Jude has indicated that it is his position that he .11 respect the desires regarding County Road 116 of each of the two cities within their respective borders (i.e. if the City of Medina wants County Road 116 constructed, the County will construct it from County Road 55 to the Medina/Orono border; then if Orono wants the County to take over the balance to Highway 12, they would respect that wish or if the City choose not to they would do nothing). Commissioner Jude had indicated that he has also spoken to a group in opposition to County Road 116 of which go under the title "Friends of Medina”. He has indicated to those individuals that should they desire not to have County Road 116 constructed in Medina, that they express their opposition to such to the Medina City Council and if they persuade that Council it would not be built. ALTERNATIVES - 1. Choose to take no action. 2. Agree with construction to County Road 6. 3. Request the construction of County Road 116 all the way to Highway 12. 4. Get an agreement that if it goes to Highway 12, the County will not undertake any projects south of Highway 12. County Road 116 April 5, 1989 Page 2 of 2 5. Table for further discussion. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that if the County does in fact go ahead and construct County Road 116, that the City request the County to place County Road 116 to Highway 12. This is in light of the fact that Orono will be faced with all the traffic concerns and the City will have to expend funds for the next several years to reconstruct the road ($310,000) anyway, and that the City could reduce its costs should the signal light be put in on Highway 12. This conversion of Willow Drive to a county road to Highway 12 is in line with the City's Comprehensive Plan as noted in the February 15, 1989. ^ This is recommended if the County would enter into an agreement with the City that it could not extend County Road 116 any further without a initiated request. It is further recommended that the realignment be shifted to the west and that abutting property owners who develop the properties in a planned development arrangement be given credit for the additional right-of-way in determining the density on the property, provided that the right-of-way is granted free of charge to the County. It is additionally recommended that the alignment at the intersection of Drive and County Road 6 be done so as to minimize the impact on the neighbors abutting Willow Drive at that juncture together with resolving the current drainage problem related to Willow Drive. PROPOSED MOTION Moved by , seconded by that the Council allow continuous opposition to the construction of County Road 116, desires that if it is to be constructed in the City of Medina, that it be continued to Highway 12 with an alignment to be worked out between the City and the County. Ayes ___, nays ___. cc: Commissioner Tad Jude Pat Murphy, City of Medina 21589.8 COUNCIL MEiriNGTOs Mayor and City Council FBON: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Adrainistratoz|V •^ • ‘.; DATS: February 15, 1989 SUBJECT: County Road 116 Attachments: A. County Road 116 Memo Dated 1/26/89 C. James Cox Letter Dated 2/1/89 Received 2/15/89 ISSUE - Determination as to what action the City mce”to have taken in relationship to County Road 116 should the County go ahe<^i with this project. INTRODUCTION - The City has transmitted its oposition to the County Road “Il6 in Medina as noted in Attachment C. At the Council's January 23, 1989 meeting the Council in addition to directing staff to express its oposition tabled consideration of the items related to what Orono would like to have done should the County proceed with County Road 116. DISCUSSION - The summary of issues are noted in Attachment A and in addition are the following issues; A review of teh comprehensive plan ^^^^sified Willow north of Highway 12 as a minor collector. As noted in the definition of that in the comprehensive plan it minimum of 80 feet right-of-way and under the jurisdictional control of Hennepin County. the'*i33ue" oY ttaf f ic count3 that were taised, had Indicated that it would go from approximately 1,400-1,900 cats pet day to approximately 2,900 cars pet Most of till's traffic would be consolidated from other north/south routes currently existing in Medina and Orono. Even at 2,900, there ate several streets in the community that presently exceed that including North Shore Drive Auid^alioShadywood (11,000 and 6,400), County Six (5,100). It should also be noted that currently Old Crystal Bay Road between Six and 12 catties 3,823 trips pet day and North Brown carries 1,911 trips per day. As*notef in Attachment C Mr. Cox has raised a drainage issue that he feels should be addressed in any change. Drainage issues that are addressed in Mr. Coxl^s letter addressed at the time of development the west side of Willow neat County Road 6 or if and when County Road 116 is scheduled to be extended to Highway 12. • -■•■r.'* ' 'I'-- ALTERNATIVES - 1. Choose to take no action. 2. Agree with full construction to County Road Six 3. Request the construction of 116 all the way to Highway 12. 4. Get an agreement that if it goes to 12 the County will not undertake any projects south of 12. 5. Table for further discussion. recommendation - It is reconmended that the _citj^ o£ OrM^ 12. undertaken. Ayes __$ Nays —. cc: Pat Murphy, Hennepin County Public Works 12689.1 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator^^ OATS: January 26, 1989 SUBJECT: County Road 116 Attachments: A. County Road 116 Dated 1/11/89 (Memo Only) B. County Road 116 Draft Resolution ISSUES - Determination as to whether th^^ s t. attached draft resolution as iL^st2tim.n”^®^f® County Road 116 proceeding south of ligh„a" si. ° to f7^indTLa\°e“ the''co!lncilToy/os\%^^r?o^2^ directed staff forward together with tabling^the balance of°tn!^ ^oing the Citys action should th^^oad be"«nst?LteL iriyyi'c t' »““>■•»= a right-of-wa/My be\eguLed recardi«^s°l®^^ acquisition of it may be appropriate that ?h« rf^,, ^ reconstructs it, owners equi/fient density credit^flr t^Vicht^if^"® ‘"’’f Ptoperty exchange for no cost inLrred in the rifh? “P If the county were to do t^ road the InVj acquisition, half the right-of-wa7costs ) it L5 h. , ^ ‘=®^'= ^ededicated in any Pla/nerdlvilopMrt^^%®Eir/i^att^^^ HighSfy*i2"and “!l“?Ii:cltlon lo^a® location of prl^Td^'e tL leed^r to tL°e“xtent thft^f?" continue toTo the extent that Hiahwaif N ?a proposed, location, the Willow/116 would north of the current northerly locatiw. Should i^too^furth® route to that part o, &. COM.?; I»r " ALTERNATrVES - Adoption of Resolution a. Adopt the resolution be Amend and adopt c. Table RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council adoot the resolution for transmission to both the County Board and the City of Medina. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that the Council adopt Resolution #_ indicating its opposition to County R ^ 116. Ayes _, Nays _. cc: Pat Murphyf iloa ! TO:Mayor and City Council FROM:Mark E. Bernhardsonp City Administrator - DATS:January 11# 1989 SUBJECT:County Road 116 ISSUE - 1 Dete'-aination oC Council's suppoct or opposition regarding We ?ropo‘sed upgrade of 116 to be expressed to the County Board. 2. If County 116 goes ahead, deteraination as to what actions the City would like the County to take in Orono. rUTSODOCTION - At the Council's January 9,^ 1989 Council meeting the iasue ”^ County Road 116 was discussed by Council. At that melting it was tabled until the January 23, 1989, meeting when individuals from the County would be present. DISCUSSION - Issue 1 - As mentioned at the last meeting the decision is one Mfrt¥e Countraoard and the City of Medina and efforts regarding that in the City of Orono should be directed one of those two bodies or both. It currently is progr Spring 1990 construction. Issue 2 - The following represent issues the City has discussed county to detarmile their position should the County choose to go ahead on 116. A. Willow Drive - Medina Border ^ Six - Related to this segment are two issues: 1. If Council desires County to take aeouirevoluntary. (The County feels they have right to acquire without City concurrence.) 2 once county has acquired jurisdiction the County, at US Iplion, cL either construct an improved segment to County Road 6 or stop at the border. 3 Construction layout - This would be construction hyout to minimize tL impact to the majority of homes. B. Willow Drive - Six to 12 - The issues related to this are the following: 1. Allowing Countv Road 11^ ^ County 6 ^ Highway 12 - Detaraination as to whether the Council desires to request Hennepin County take over this on a voluntary basis. 2. Reconstruction - Determining whether the Council desires to have or approve plans of this segment i- the County takes it over. 3. Alionment - Deteraine if the Council desires to have this s'egmSrt constructed slightly to the west (up to 14') to buffer existing residences on the east without a substantial Impact on the undeveloped portion to the west. 4. Right-of-way - Only the costs entailed would be 1/2 of right-of-wa^ costs. ($19/000 - 2 « 9/500)^ The right-of-way costs between 6 and 12 could be minimized by dedication of ROW for development. ^ Blice Trails - As an ootion a one sided bike path could be installed for about $19,000 of which the City would pay half. It should be additionally noted that should f the entire lenght from the border to Highway 12 the following benefits accrue to the City of Orono: 1. stanalixation at Willow/12 - While this guarantee a signal at the point that vehicle warrants lot cross traffic ate met, the County would pick up a lortion of the light which would otherwise be Orono s ($10,000). 2- MSA Mileaqe/Funding - Should th^a ^®“"ty take over wilTow Drive the City would be able to designate another Srtion of that road in the City if it chooses £o«: MSA designation together with using its ^artiinlaryfor other needs in the community. This is particuiary in light of the City saving any reconstruction monies for the future for Willow. ALTERNATIVE.^ - Issue 1. 1. Choose to support. 2. Choose '^o oppose. 3. Choosg take no position. 4. Choose to table. issue 2.A. Willow - Medina to Six la- Choose not to participate. lb. Allow County to voluntarily take over the segment. 2. Allow construction of an upgraded 3. Specify alignment for that construction. 4. Acquistion of effected properties. 5. Table. B. Willow - Six ^ 12 la. Choose'"not to participate. lb. Voluntarily allow the County to take over that section. 2. Allow the County to reconstruct. 3. Allow the County to under taka a relignment. 4. Allow reconstruction of Willow Drive into allignment 1. 5. Table. RECOMMENDATION - Issue 1. - It is recommended that if the Council desires^ to express opposition or support to do so in the form of a resolution directed to the County Board. Issue 2. - If the project goes ahead the staff makes the following recommendations for the City Council to consider. This is predicated and assuming that the traffic generated will be at the Medina border and its an effort at trying to make the best of the situation. a. That the Council allow the County to take over the entire stretch to Highway 12 b. Require the County to reconstruct it*along an alignment that the City desires. c. That the Count/ work with the City to minimize the impact on the homes particularly north of County Road 6. d. Predicate it upon the County contributing to the area south of 12 should the bridge upgrade be undertaken. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by __, Seconded by __, that the Council directs staff to work with the County along the lines of the staff's recommendation. Ayes __, Nays __• IrTn^ RESOLUTIOH IN OPPOSITION TO COUNTY ROAD IIS BEING EXTENDED FROM BI6EWAY 55 TO COUNTY ROAD SIX WHEREAS, the City of Medina has contemplated construction of a north/south route from Highway 55 to its southern border in the approximate center of the community, and WHEREAS, the City of Medina under 5,000 population does not qualify for Minnesota State Aid Roads, and WHEREAS, the County has agreed to fund construction of this road through its bonding funds for an estimated total of $2.9 million, and WHEREAS, the City of Orono having a population over 5,000 receives its own Municipal State Aid monies, and WHEREAS, although the County's standards for construction of 116 would be similar to a revision of WiJ low done by the City, the City is concerned about the negative impact of increased traffic by construction of this route in Medina, and WHEREAS, substantial opposition to this road in Medina was made evident at the Orono Council's consideration of this matter, and WHEREAS, substantial opposition in Orono was generated to this proposal, and WHEREAS, the City of Orono realizes that the County has the legal right to designate and/or construct any or all portions of the road it chooses to in the City of Orono. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono goes on record indicating to the County Board and the City of Medina its opposition to construction of County 116 from Highway 55 to County Road Six. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held February 13, 1989. ATTEST: V James R. Grabek, Mayor Dorothy M. Hailin, City Clerk 11/ r r-X- A 1 • \ ■ mcona I I •'•KUttVVKt —p.r.-..-.~-- -■— ------ (X : ='V" r ^ ^j-\ : i = ^: ' -''*»«'»»i»»iiiniiijiiiiiiiiiii,|,,^ i . •" ) j— ' I ! _., X..—.... : '^’•’ • j*' - l"jj i i w.-‘l‘:’'' IB r>v.; -. • --. Ml** M-. _ ;mrr m,- i5*’5- I .'iCas.*?? w mm«I3:1 JUNE, 1980 TpAM<^pnRTATLON. opTMCIPAL arterial a to^move vehicles through an capacity, contro±Ted access h ^ , arterials have no local land use area, not within a terial’near Orono is that portion of State access. The only P“"=^PtLtnncces3 east of Orono's eastern boundary Highway 12 that becomes limited-access eas with wayzata. TMTERMEDIATE ARTERI^ '^highwardestgnef t^move^vehic!"^ moderately hxgn L^.^een the free-standing growth :ut:st"atr:rti:s ’iesrororono in« iTiiiiieTto or collector. JOHISOICTION: STATE OEPART.MEHT OF rIGHT-OF-WAT width: MINIMUM 100 FEET FOR TWO DANE MIMOR arterial a Minor SI7!Snrsu:re ’gi:^s!= i-,«-:ru^:rra^dTrrchiraffrc!'^ arterial functioning to move, Pf^"° munlties into the urbanized areas of till the western lake channels traffic away from the Twin Cities. The minor attar future, to Lake Minnetonka ^^.^tate Hxghways^l2^an^^ use access a direct intersection with In t generators and local street t^frre"cri^nr«rtho^if ^ire^: ::i:»'^:o individual residences. aURISDICTIOW: HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF right-of-way width: MINIMUM 80 FEET FOR TWO LANE collector a collector n“««^,f“"'^ttivity centos crtfLlnsectlons streets and move it “*^’^^°'rials. Local land use access is permitte with minor or intermediate arterial direct access to be Suris regulated as to location and number witn^ available. Intersectior avoided whenever ^“'controlled with signals or with four-way with other collectors are stop signs. Traffic usage is moderate. JURISDICTION: COUNTY OR CITY right-of-way WIDTH: 60-66 FEET CMP 7-15 ^ 5___S\_1-------vc:'--------yJSL.r^^J3LSt«UO -i^ s'J ^ fnii To: Orono City Council Fei ^ W‘=‘ live at 1020 N. Willow Drive (east side of Willow, souths sio»i!%sScr* water run-off. In regartU Co. Hd. Il6, there are four questions I would like to answered: 1. 2. 3. make It safer — a 4-way Stop? Concernlr*;^ the Intersection of Hwy 12 and Willow ““ In the momlnfiT and from 2:30 on In the afternoon It Is next to ^SoossISiftrieron Hw^ 12 Iftriples, how are you going to handle this av.-ltlonal traf.l without serious accidents? Do you realize If a connection Is made Lori Lake a tremendous amount of ?®®is.®°'^„«SniL Drivl will use this road who presently do "se Can you see semis trying to cross Co. Hd. 6 and get on Hwy 12? They are using 101 and 19 now. SMS »‘sf.SiSS‘5si5r:fEs srs:u.M “5.s;. Second, regarding surface water run-off: we own the land on the southeast side of Willow Drive and Co. Ed.6 This Is a family farm that has been In our family sine- 13^5. We hav“ had an on-golng water problem errodlng our land the^hllUps^evelSpmeSt on Co. Hd. 6, and also from tne recent r.«T.nt*iMno- In water drainage on the west side of Willow between rerouting ^ Co. Hd. Il6 being widened and new d?4cnfs lo^m ihe easiest way for them to get rid of excess water Is to run It across our property. 4. We will r.ot alloe this to happen, and we do want to hear back how you Intend to solve the water problem on the west side of Willow and from the Phillips project. I have been trying to work on this with John Gerhardson for a year and a half but have not accomplished much yet. I look forward to hearing your answers. Sincerely, / James A. Zo'/ 1020 N. Willow Drive Long Lake, Kn. ■.v ‘ . r . . ■; .' '' . '...• ••• .••• • '.V-.,- ^♦;,T‘V»-;:v.';‘ V;;. iS-j •• I V..'. ... . . . '•. • ■ — •... ,- ~r '*;.•• ■* • — ■/■•. . ■' - ■ ■ • • \ ;,• JV-.:*' >4t. • • * •, - , , 1^. . r*.. .• <!' • * ■ ■ ... .. ** ■’ ‘ ■ * •• .* • . ^ • . *V * •• *• ^ . -/rev •’ ■' ••%::;vV^::VV';';,’- • * *•*/ *w. ■; .• • . • .■ . 1 •'.I •V- ’.. ,;.■■■ ' ■ V: *' '• *‘*!* Tad Jude COMMlSSIOi'JEK 34«^tt054 APR - 3:939"’“'=^ "’°®f Board of H ennepin County Commissioners 2400 Government Center Minneapolis , Minnesota s54A7 March 28, 1989 Mark Bernhardson City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 5j323 Dear Mark: I appreciated the opportunity to discuss the status of County Road 116 on the phone with you. As I mentioned to you, I will respect and support the official position of the cities through which County Road 116 is proposed to be built. It is important to me that county and city work hand in hand regarding transportation and other issues where our responsibilities meet. ;e City of Medina continues to formally support tc.. ty Road 116 on its proposed alignment and design, that will also be my position concerning the City of Medina. I would expect to respect the position of the City of Orono in a similar fashion. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance to you on this or other issues of concern. Sincerely, \ CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. ^^ ^ ^ ‘ j / ^ ^ SUPPORTING CO. RD. 116 IN THE CITIES OF ORONO AND^MEDINA'^ ^-55 WHEREAS/ tne extension of County Road 116 has been on the City of rehensive Plan for many years, and WHEREAS/ the construction of County Road 116 will greatly enhance the City of Medina's emergency response capabilities, and ^VHEREAS, the county's road standards are better than those of the City of Medina's, thus providing for better traffic and recreation routes, and IVHEREAS, the maintenance of some existing City of Medina roads will be taken over by the county, and WHEREAS, the City of Medina is under 5,000 population and does not qualify for Minnesota State Aid Roads, and WHEREAS, the construction of County Road 116 will cost $2.9 million, which is more than the City of Medina can afford, and WHEREAS,the City of Orono as well as all cities of the City of Medina's size have more county roads than the City of Medina, and WHEREAS, with this resolution the City of Medina reaffirms its commitment to the construction of County Road 116, and WHEREAS, Hennepin County has placed the extension of County Road 116 on it's 1990 road construction plan, WHEREAS, County Road 116 will end at the City of Orono border if the City of Orono docs not permit it to extend further south, and WHEREAS, traffic will probably increase on the City of Orono streets, and at the intersection of Willow Drive and Highway 12, and WHEREAS, the City of Medina will support the City of Orono in obtaining a stop light at Willow Drive and Highway 12 if the City of Orono permits County Road 116 to extend to Highway 12, and WHEREAS, the extension of County Road 116 is good for the City of Orono for the same reasons as it is for the city of Medina, now THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina goes on record reconroending that the City of Orono allow County Road 116 to extend to U.S. Highway 12. Adopted by the Council of the City of Medina this_ ATTEST:' Clerk-Treasurer /7 • i TO: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator . FROM: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director DATE: April 6, 1989 SUBJ: County Road 15/Boulevard Restoration During the reconstruction of County Road 15, the new design allowed for sidewalks on both sides of the road. Between the curb and the sidewalk is a boulevard area that is approximately 2 to 2.5 feet wide. Initially the boulevard area was to be filled with concrete from Blaine Avenue east to County Road 19. From Blaine Avenue west to the Orono/Spring Park border, sod was to boulevard. We have had the opportunity to evaluate the effect of snow removal and maintenance to the boulevard area west of Blaine Avenue. We feel that sod in that area is not appropriate as the appearance will not be what is expected and maintenance will be time consuming and expensive. The City of Orono has an agreement with Hennepin County for cost shai i.s; this type of expenditure. The City would pay 75% and Hennepin County would pay 25% of the . boulevard area. The total cost would amount to $12,240, of which Orono would pay $9,180. Recommendations To approve concrete in the boulevard area on County Road 13 from Blaine Avenue West to the Orono/Spring Park Border. Proposed Motion:moved.seconded, to approve riaVilfcgHt^e ilTth^boulevard area'Sf County Road 15 from Blaine Avenue west to the Orono/Spring Park border. TO: Mayor Grabek and Councilmembers FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator ATTACHMENTS:a. ) Boulevard Memo dated 7/7/88 b. ) Council Minutes 7/11/88 c. ) Boulevard Memo dated 7/21/88 d. ) Council Minutes 7/25/88 This is again presented as a number of the Council has indicated interest in having this reviewed. Forwarded recommending approval. V';’' •Ww.,^- K nwom OF TD p««w^» oaoao ooobcxl Manw old jol» ii« iftt ••••MDts of prlvato roods now oxiot ond it ***®®^^ ^•*** any oroblaM thara aav ba. City Adalniatrator Bam^rdaon a^tad tSlt «l.h.d to uko th. oddltioo to inelud. »o«dw.y aorfaelna and privata iaprovaaantao Thay appaar in eartaln placaa* but not in othara. Tha ataff will bring back a aunaary for publication at naxt naating# mmmmtrmmmrn “ COMOHFTXOH -2scsj'!ss*in'ihi:*^tj;j.*‘* sf:i5:iio'S“?^k ordinanca anandnant and tha auaaary ordinanca ragardlng undar ago conauaption. Notion* Ayaa-4, Haya-0* Notion paaaad. *®®“'^“cit?S55nlatrator Barnhardaon axplalnad that thissr».Vi\"iU.vvo\t\v:K*t*.*d *r^ o*?o*..7.‘j.r.»^id'?^3 s:«.7.r:i.v tV”.nV."ia that coaaaroial propartioa will not taka .V oT: :ii conca’rnad thara ara approxiaataly 100 traaa J*** "“yo*5T yfjj could ba utllisad. It ia aatiaatad that it will coat approxiaataly |45.00/traa to hava tha City ®®**‘*®* traaa. Ooattan aakad whathar tha buainaaa oouldn t taka *aaponaibility. Tha Nayor faala that thia won't bappan and tha iraa^will look tarribla. It waa aovad by Councilaaabar ^tta^ lacondad by* Councilaaabar Fataraon* that both tha cMtroial and laaidantial araaa should ba graaa. fataraon aakad coat a^lf#runca oaing caaant. Public Worka Director Carhardaon •4tiMtad tha dlffaranoa to ba |B»000.00 higher uaing concrete, ^■o^’.ion* Ayaa-3* Nayor Craybak oppoaad* Notion paaaaa. OMW xvmcir;?« FBOJBCT onhn - BHOUFTIOII counciliwabar fatatsok-)* to adopt Basolotion AllNatrepol itar. Naata Control Coaaiaalon Project B5-B7. Notion* hyaa-4» Haya-0. ; ‘ ."•ytT OOBFXIIUnON OF WMKflTmmt - C2WItJZ ••««'*«* by C0«nclli-rt.wAS waa 8*«Kayflar at a rataFataraon*©onririi'tha aaployaant of Xauria Bchafflar at a ra^ of ••!?§ affa.*^tiva July 11, for 32 hours par weak with prorated bsMfita. Notion* Ayaa-4* Baya-0. BALABT ABJOOniBrr - FXNANCB DX It was aovad by Council.aaaibar Callahan* aacondad by Cenncili ' V ‘ ' c. \... .. ■ V ■r> Kiis?:- if- r wm Kpi 99$ Dmtmt BxpoMd A99r«9«t« 3.SO fl.f. Fav«r Brick 3«2S ••£• I3S,000 32,500 There ere no edditlonel coete to the City for bltuolnooe or Optione for booleeerd ereei enpoeed eggrerete, paver brick, bitnoineoe, end eod. •■f-AMMemeTioa sna to the high coat of expoaed egoregete or paver biicSrit ie •^•ff^ !55^i!**t-5i5ilItUl Iwabe bltoainotte in the ceaMrcial ■*?if the adjacent property owner ia willing to eaintain. PBOfOBtP MOTIOW Hoved by __, eecondedMT»lir''S7«ttaTnatte in the boulevard area in the coeoercial area ano ;i I«S“h?Z'.«rd .rSTli; th. rMi«.ntl.X ttM it th. rtj.e«it i* •Him, to Mlntom. *yoo ----, ooro ---- Hayor Orabek and Orono Council Meebere I Nark E. Bemhardeon, City Adeinietrator Forwarded recoeeending approval# l7ll Nark B. Bemhardaon, City Adidnleeretor John B« Cerhardaon» Foblio Norke Director cUL J2 13.7^ July 31, IMi u.7\ ■oolevard Beetoration - County Boad 15 Ks=r.“-i's.nrs“iiss^.‘s-K M'ASS- propertiee willing to ieaif\tain the aod. The Council decided that the boulev^d Jhl project be aod and that the adjacent property ewnere eeintain the aod. Diacueaion following the neetlng reaolted in "taff reeearching different aateriala ether than aod or bitnwinw fw SrUeairilal area. The two ether altemativea are an expoaed aggregate or pavet brick aurface. The ceanereial area that wee reviewed ie free Blaine eaat and north and eouth of 13^" bounty Bead If. Thia area hae roughly 10,000 aquare feet of bealevard area. The additional coata to the City for expoaed aggregate or paver bricka ia aa followai m ' :;w . 'n ,V{-- rf‘ r. * ’ ‘ ., V ; - • •> • I . JJ. . . - •*; j,* - ■ui# t- . •-* mV-r-: 'I> ■/ n .^1 miwaru or m rkom cpopciL miiro nu) jult is* isii S!is.1 s7S!S.stK;:K;V4 ..?.%/sr5S.W4:!W land vitJilit tha City of Orono. MMlon* lrtya*0. Notion paaaod. S!ial«rt7J!3 thtooohoot tbo ontlta boulooard would atand. - ----.— yataraen aakod what tha coat of plain canant tk. .STir..«ia i». ijbiio«mM b« kwroklkktjly *1S.00C.#0. It w» tk* witlf* •*•■'•.*"**"**5.*fi?NluI«*A» *k4 ■*lnt*ti»ne*. Cooncll***k*r ii*Li:rrrr.i-.ankVtn?:?kV-n5r.k7^r^^^ of tun bnolnoaaoa In Navarro war Nayor cVtbak ranlndad thajs.;iTtk':ri;^‘-«'r«.^t?M'ir.’k.""fioir. ’s?**.....«-.- k.y*r Orabak'a notion. It >.«*a by 2T.-.5i?r;s:ia ‘V3whan It would baeooa aoft and auacaptlbla to narrina ana ga<ia*n9 Ayaa-2* Nayn»2. It waa novad by Mayor A"l,^Sd^aaorwS^fIw plantar* concrata thou^boot tha antlra ■ ^iSjt Sot? tha City aa to thain approprlata locationa, and obtain a report tro» xnm u*i.7 /»'0^v»'A * « 'smm v;mi j m v:' 5^'-- '■ • C;-.1i-. •f^. > .* '»•■ i': ' . >* ’^*' V. V r '• • Ik• *. ^ J -• V*'-^ . * # • '■' 'l, ^ •'► '*'l;ii| .t ■ * . %t •J. or ra RKOiMi fMslMlty of tb# flooor ploatoro. ;i, mnra mo jokt as* iftt Notioiif bfo»-2» !ioyo*2. "*m5 s****"* ««»"<«< *».5^J!rS'.5iii*rt!’iiiSV? ‘?-ss^.JUUir;p^.^Tt:TU-rt.“r;vr«'.Si;'.rtr^^^^^^ Notioo potood ««■ a t» «• Bev«d by eeanatlMabw •»< •«eo«4«< b» Mayor y*^*y**»a. ■_» ^SUm^tTplaa^a in tbn bmlnana Oittrlet and t<»a and ttaat U lK%i5dS^i.» •Srv*l«i. *y —«. ».y-0. Ihitlan paaaad. • - cSat!S!i«lnbor Callahan fo/*^"*^ raM«Va.*''cUy"M2I!mtVtcJ KS.5 srnij’jsri ?.vr •».'«’ aijMftr'at^ *?5r «i..» ;TM»!Iy. woSoo. *yo»-«* "•»••«• •••*^’ ineroKOO woo o 91S.17. notion* Ayoo-4, noya-o* Notion pooooa. “■sssis srs,*iK:i srss asrarRi.s‘»- mion* Ayoo»4* NoyoHJ* Notion pooood* ***l?5r.o*.d by •••»“j?srs tS mStis ;ith31* Hit* whlclwwor occoro flrat. Notion* nyoa««y nay* r- NlMWmC OOOL «ati?risS2s i^dWa’-M nrt«^ lJ‘.*»’!?Jtf.n ‘aV.*d*a"..**JSr?-‘5: ■ • < • ' - »’j-, .nv 4789.IHD /?■ 1.. - Tox Mark E. Bernhardsorir City Administrator Proa: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director Datex April 7# 1989 Sobjectx Center Island Median “ 880 Townline P.oad The developer of the Painters Woods subdivision, 880 Townline Road, has requested permission to construct an intersection with a center island and monument. Staff has reviewed the request and suggests the following: 1. Center island be completely off public right-of-way. 2. Maximum width of center island be 12 feet. 3. B-618 concrete curb surrounding center island. 4. 16 feet paved roadway on each side of center island with 8* shoulder on outside edge of roadway. 5. 10:1 taper on outside edge of roadway. 6. Street radi increased to 30 feet and 40 feet as shown on attached sketch. 7. Proper signage for traffic control as directed by Public Works Director. 8. Entrance mo iument sign shall not exceed 12 square feet as per Section 10.61, Subdivision 2 (A) 3. 9. Entrance monument and sign shall not exceed 5 feet in height. RECOMMENDATION - To approve the installation of a cercer island Intersection monument at the Painters Woods subdivision, 880 Townline Road, with the above guidelines. PROPOSED MOTION Moved by _ _, seconded by _ _, to approve of a center island intersection and monument at the Painters Woods subdivision, 880 Townline Road, with staff recommended guidelines. Ayes _ _, nays _ _. Tox Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members ProBx Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Forwarded recommending approval. 8ENSH00F & ASSOCIATES, INC. . TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE CONSULTANTS 7901 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 119 / EDEN PFW/RIE, MINNESOTA 55344 / (612) 944-7590 / FAX(612) 944-9322 March 16, 1909 REFER TO FILE:09-34-10 NEHORANDUM TO: J.W. Franks* Fullerton Properties* Inc. FROM: James A. Benshooi RE: Access Plan For Painters Woods Development PURPOSE In accordance with your request* we have analyzed the layout for the Painters Woods access roadway at Its Intersection with Town Line Road. The principal question we have addressed Is whether adequate traffic operations could be provided If the access roadway Is constructed with a center IsI and. In add 111on to answer Ing this fundamenta1 quest I on• you further requested that we provide appropriate design guide IInes. To accomplish this work* we have performed several efforts* Including: Important Visited the project site to observe specific character1stIcs at the Intersection of the Painters Woods access roadway and Town Line Road. It was no^ed that a public street Is aligned opposite the Painters Woods access roadway. Good sight distance was noted on alI approaches to the Intersection, with the only exception being that a tree In the northeast quadrant limits visibility between the north and east. Related to the current plans for Painters Woods* Including the layout for the entrance roadway and the plans for the entrance monument. Related to pertinent traffic engineering strsndards Involving the design of center Islands In roadways. APPLICABLE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING STANDARDS 0ased on research of multiple traffic engineering pubI lea* tions* three resource documents that are particularly pertinent to this situation are as follows: . "Recommended Guidelines for Subdivision Streets»** Institute of TransportatIon Engineers* 1934 . "Guidelines for Driveway Design and Loc,jtlon*" Institute of TransportatIon Engineers* 1905 Mr, J.W. Franks -2-March 16, 1909 "traffic ?s?ends*can?"fn'^genepIT"* •ndicatea on page 69 that accident severities." At^maJor hioh"*''^?“^* fover center Is lane Is construct^'^on onf^V"^ »ntersectlons. If a an Island also would nonnaTfy be coni?? ®r '"tersectlon. l'S^%ln%%‘^rire^tS-'-‘^ and to provide a safe. understanSrT^^^s^ct^r l^;::::!" Painters WooL'^ccess’rSadway ?^*a'’tSo'f opposite the sravel street, which servMTust - l-S k®"®’ volume on this street and glien that th-^**' 'o**practically no east-w««<- would be and the Painters Woods roadway* we^havl* that street properly designed center *^® ®°"Pluded that a roadway would not adversely affect traff?e"^%’r“®°®* access to provide an understandabIe Intersectloii'i _ turning movements, a key eonmnnerr*?®^!?" layout and safe ? Island. The aoove referent 2 ® '* *^® the ^ * UP to 12 feet In width are 'atlsfn"ry?‘"*“'=* reconmenoed access plan l^and w?°rproC?de*Lf2"traff?e'‘‘'*^ layout with a that the Island l, not wl5e? ^han ?? e Provided a specific recommended access rMd favI!^','"® ^“^® P'^eloped Major features of the recommended Pl2ra3e ‘«%ol Io::s'. ‘ * . Maximum Island width of 12 feet. rrSnc'r “ order ectfCe?y'*iccoiS^ corners In,,6. -ccoinmoaate right turn maneuvers. 4589.4 n r- . ■- TO: Mayor and City Council PROM: Hark E. Bernhardson, City Adminlstrat DATS: April 5, 1989 SUBJECT: Police Department 1988 Corporate Report ... .i I • * Attachment: A. Police Department 1988 Corporate Report Forwarded recommending acceptance. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by __, seconded by __, the Orono City Council acknowledges receipt o£ the Police Department's 1988 Corporate Report including the 1988 Financial results. Ayes _, Nays DAT TO: APRIL fi. 1989 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SPRING PARK CITY OF MINNETONKA BEACH CITY OF LONG LAKE CITY OF ORONO FROM: MELVIN KILBO. CHIEF OF POLICE SUBJECT: POLICE DEPARTMENT CORPORATE REPORT Several of the Department's goals for 1988 centered around drinking and driving. One of these goals was an alcohol and drug awareness program spearheaded by Officer English. Ihis was directed towards teen drinking, parent attitude and house parties. The Department made over 130 arrests. Officer Cornick was sent to "D.A.R.E.” training to enhance both Officer Friendly program as well as further training for 4th ana 5th graders in our school system, with the first classes to begin in April, 1989. Appendix A. The Department arrested ?\7 persons for DWI in 1988. 'Chis compares with 223 arrest in 1987. and 182 arrests in 1986. Appendix B. Because of road construction on Cty. 15. and two fatal motor vehicle accidents on Hwy. 12. the Department concentrated heavy radar patrol in these areas. In 1988, there were 368 motor vehicle accidents, three of which were fatal. Thes^ fatal accidents were located at iiwy. 12 and Old Long Lake Rd. , Hwv 12 and Wayzata Blvd. , and a *^tt and run pedestrian fatal accident at Cty. 19 and the Narrows "'ridge, which Is still unsolved and under investigation. S era! major traffic accidents continue to occur at Hwy 12 and Willow Dr. Six major truck inspections were conducted as a part of our traffic safety program. We inspected 543 vehicles, issued 640 warnings, 77 citations were issue-? and 57 vehicles were put out of service. Officer Anderson was sent to an nccldent reconstruction course to enhance our invostigai.^ ’•ns. r* Our 17 reserve officers assisted ir* the Easy Place Run, the Crappie contest, Wayazata 4th of July activities. Long Lake Corn Days, and assisted at school functions for a - otal of 2,985 hours of donated service in 1988. Page - 1 Officers Tomchecfc and Morowczynski were nominated and selected for Honorable Mention Police Officers of the Year by the Minnesota Chiefs of Police Association. Officer Michael Kirnyczuk was retired for medical reasons. Kevin Walsh continued as our Community Service Officer. Our previous CSO, Rick Denneson, accepted a position as a police officer with West Hennepin Public Safety Department. A part-time officer was added to our staff to cover Officer Kirnyczuk’s shift until his retirement was accomplished and the position was continued to the year end because of Long Lake’s indication that they would reduce manpower for 1989. Our part-time Officer, Jim Morrow, accepted a position with the Eden Prairie Public Safety, and was replaced by Scott Kuyper. The team leader concept was inaugurated. A sexual harassment seminar was held for all personnel. Our computer equipment was updated and a second link to the state computer was added. Our squad cars were striped to add visibility, with the contract cars being marked with the appropriate city marking on them. They have received favorable response. Major investigations involved Super Value armed robberies which were solved by arrest, crappie fishing contest fraud, pull tab fraud, as well as ongoing narcotic investigations. The Department hao all officers follow-up on criminal cases, and it has to date a successful venture. For example, in 1987 the Orono Police Department investigated 58 burglaries and closed 10 of the cases for a clearance rate of 17%. The average rate of closure for burglary in Hennepin County was 7%. Departments of our size,(Champlin and Mound for example), that have detectives had a closure rate of 13% for 1987. 1988 breakdowns for the county are not completed yet. The 1988 Police Department Operations Financial Report is added. Appendix C Page - 2 TO: Chief Mel Kilbo FROM: Officer Chip English DATE: September 20, 1988 SUBJ: Drug & Alcohol Awareness Program: Follow-up and Conclusion The students at Orono High School have now begun another school year. With the start of the school year we mark the conclusion of the drug and alcohol program and its enforcement phase. I have assessed the impact of ^ our enforcement efforts over the summer months. The statistics were quite interesting, providing us with many clues as to the origins of our drug abuse incidents in the Orono Jurisdictional area. The actual statistics are not a complete representation of the total number of violations encountered. I have obtained the statistics from compu ter entries made under the heading of "minors consuming alcohol" which in and of itself does not encompass incidents where primary headings were arrests for such things as driving %ihile under the influence of alcohol, driving after suspension or revocation, warrant arrests, etc., where the secondary heading or other citations issued was for minor consuming or possessing alcohol. Many times we have contacts with minors for larger offenses and the minor is later cited for consuming or possessing narcotics. Only the primary heading is entered into the computer so the actur" counts I am giving you clearly do not contain all the contacts we had this summer. I have included the number of arrests made during the summer season from June 1st until September 6th when school started again. The period in which I pulled the statistics reflect the time frame which ve targeted to improve the difficulties we encountered from previous suEBoers. As I compiled the statistics, I found a high percentage of the contacts were made at several "hang-outs" in our area to which our officers should definitely provide extra patrol. Ve had numerous contacts at Summit Park in Long Lake, two minors were arrested from outside Lord Fletchers, six were arrested near the Marina Liquor Store, and eight were cited from the Burger King lot in Long Lake. Ve also received information that adults were buying liquor for minors outside of the Liquor Barn and Lakeside Liquor on a regular basis. Throughout the summer months it was consistently found that the persons being cited were not Orono area residents. The minors cited were almost exclu sively from the metro area outside of our jurisdictional boundaries. I broke the offenders down by home address into five categories; Orono communities, Orono*s bordering communities, metro area, out state, and out of state. Of those cited within our jurisdiction, sixteen were from Orono, three were from Spring Park, and two were from Long Lake. No citations were issued to any Minnetonka Beach residents (although numerous citations were issued in the Minnetonka Beach area). This total figure of 21 citations is 16.5Z of the total 130 arrests (citations) made from June 1st through September 6th. A/H Page 2 of nemo to Chief lilbo A total of 59 arrests were made on residents who live in our immediate bordering communities. These cities include: Mound, Minnetrista, Maple Plain, Plymouth, Medina, Vayzata, and the Tonka Bay aroa. These 59 arrests accounted for 45.3X of all arrests made. 28.4Z were cited from the Minneapolis/St. Paul area. 7.6Z were from another state other than Minnesota (representations were made from the states of Texas, Wisconsin, and New York). Therefore, of the 130 persons arrested %d.thin our Jurisdiction, 109 were not residents of this area. 83.8X of the time we were citing non-Orono area residents. I/)catlon of Hone Kesid^ice of Persons Cited Under 340A,503 in the Orono Area Local Residents Number Cited Orono 16 Spring Park 3 Long Lake 2 Minnetonka Beach 0 Bordering Communities Total 21 Number Cited Mound 28 Minnetrista 1 Maple Plain 6 Plymouth 15 Medina 0 Vayzata 2 Tonka Bay area 7 Metro area; 37 total cited Total 59 Out state: 10 total cited Out of state; 3 total cited Total Citations 130 In cases where officers responded to a Juvenile party in which many vehicles were found outside the residence where drinking had taken place by minors, officers mailed out notices to the registered owners of the vehicles. Sixty-one such notices were st.u- out during this period. The police department received very positive feedback from the use of these notices. Page 3 of to Chief nibo No fourteen year olds were cited for narcotics violations or liquor violations, Accurate statistics are not available on how many 15-20 year olds were arrested for narcotics violations although we do have statistics broken down by age group and their frequency of arrest for alcohol violations: 15 year 16 year 17 year 18 year 19 year 20 year olds olds olds olds olds olds 8 total 13 total 13 total 28 total 52 total 16 total citations citations citations citations citations citations (6%) (lOX) (10%) (21%) (40%) (12%) Seven gross misdemeanor charges were filed with Hennepin County for procuring liquor for minors. Several DWI arrests were made connected to minor consuming cases. Many of the alcohol violations involved minors being arrested and cited for open bottle violations as well. It was clear that direct enforcement tactics were not completely successful in and of themselves. We had numerous repeat offenders over the summer months, a couple who received three or four citations for consuming. I. firmly believe that the informational sessions we conducted at the Orono High School was a more functional deterrent to minors consuming in our area. Indeed, despite che fact that we had twenty-one arrests made of minors living within our jurisdiction, only two (emphasis added) of the 310 students we talked to at the high school %fere cited for consuming alcohol under age. The other nineteen 15-20 year olds either did not attend the high school talks the police department conducted or were never Orono High School students. Most people, when given accurate and clear information, can make rational choices as to the manner in which they will conduct themselves according to law. I think the program performed admirably in this respect. We also received indirect feedback from the Hennepin County Court System on the minor consuming alcohol cases we referred to them. At the beginning of the summer we saw dispositions which ranged from a suspended fine to an imposed fine of $50. Later in the summer we began to see a minimum of a $50 fine for first time offenders. By the end of the summer, judges were consis tently handing down $100 fines and some judges were also mandating that the offender attend an alcohol awareness/assessment course and a few were adding in a suspended five day jail sentence contingent upon no further violations. » I believe it is a wise choice to send our Officer Friendly, James Cornick to the DARE school. It is the effort we show towards elementary and middle school age students that will enable these future adults to take more thoughtful steps toward avoiding alcohol and drug abuse and keep them out of the court system. Page 4 of meao to Chief LLlbo There will always be parties where alcohol is served. There will always be persons willing to sell harmful drugs. And minors will always be able to find someone to buy liquor for them at the closest liquor store. I think we owe it to our youth to give them information they can use to resist these dangerous temptations - making our jobs easier and their lives safer. I wish to thank Officer James Cornick and Officer Chuck Schauss for their assistance at the Orono High School. Their additional perspectives and insights during the talks made the program a success. I'd like to also thank Sue Sjeklocha at the Orono High School for Eussisting us in coordinating our efforts at the high school. I am proud to say that the program has gained # positive feedback from many parents and helped to keep many of their children out of trouble with the Orono Police Department. Thank you. Chief Kilbo and Lieutenant Cheswick, for your support of this program. The program has added another positive dimension to my career in law enforcement. Thank you for the opportunity for me to participate in this program, I truly enjoyed it! cc: Lt. Qieswick Officer Cornick Officer Schauss Sue Sjeklocha OFFENSES MURDER RAPE ROBBERY ASSAULT BURGLARY LARCENY AUTO THEFT ARSON PART I TOTAL C . li. . L 1 1Offenses Known Unfounded Total Offenses Total Offense Cleared by Arrest 1 % Number Cleared by Arrest^__Persons Under 18^^' X Number j 1 1 100 1 3 3 2 •2 50 1 51 51 9 5 1 1 284 5 279 16 46 2 2 19 5 14 4 6 7 1 4 4 50 2 364 11 353 18 62 2 6 21 21 95 10 2 5 16 16 43 7 6 1 66 66 56 37 1 1 3 3 100 3 33 1 167 167 17 29 2 4 1 1 ‘ 100 1 7 7 14 1 47 47 100 47 4 2 6 3 3 100 3 276 276 100 276 2 114 114 100 114 18 21 49 49 100 49 107 105 74 79 870 5 865 62 537 5 45 1234 16 1218 57 699 4 51 OTHER ASSAULT FORGERY ' FRAUD r»ROPERTY i/ANDALISM WEAPONS )THER SEX NARCOTIC AMILY CHILDREN t)WI IQUOR LAWS )ISORDERLY )THER PART II TOTAL rRAND TOTAL ARRESTS EXCEPT TRAFFIC Adults A07 Juveniles i TOTAL bFFENSES MURDER ^^PE JOBBERY ASSAULT JURGLARY ;j\RCENY ^UTO THEFT \RSON ’ART I TOTAL ORONO Offenses Knav/n Unfounded Total Offenses Total Offense Cleared by Arrest 1 X Number Cleared by Arrest Persons Under 18 X Number 1 1 100 1 1 1 1 •1 100 1 24 24 12 3 143 3 140 13 19 1 14 5 9 44 4 11 1 3 3 33 1 187 8 179 16 29 1 2 10 10 90 9 10 1 6 6 50 3 16 1 11 11 81 9 2 2 100 2 50 1 88 88 18 16 2 2 1 1 100 1 • 4 4 30 30 100 30 6 2 5 2 3 100 3 163 163 100 163 1 2 53 53 100 53 26 14 30 30 43 13 65 2 63 69 44 468 4 464 74 346 4 23 655 12 643 58 375 3 25 )THER ASSAULT •ORGERY ' ^RAUD ROPERTY VANDALISM rEAPONS >THER SEX lARCOTIC •AMILY CHILDREN >WI .lOUOR LAWS USORDERLY »THER >ART II TOTAL 2RAND TOTAL \RRESTS EXCEPT TRAFFIC Adults 326 Juveniles TOTAL 389 OFFENSES Offenses Known Unfounded Total Offenses Total Offense Cleared by Arrest X Number Cleared by Arrest Persons Under 18 X Number 1 1 . 20 20 10 2 60 60 25 15 33 1 3 3 66 2 1 1 100 1 85 85 23 20 2 2 MURDER RAPE ROBBERY ASSAULT BURGLARY LARCENY AUTO THEFT ARSON PART I TOTAL 2 2 100 2 100 2 9 9 44 4 12 12 66 8 8 1 34 34 20 7 2 1 1 1 9 9 100 9 1 1 55 55 100 55 24 24 100 24 33 8 8 8 25 2 16 16 87 14 171 1 170 73 125 5 14 256 1 255 56 145 3 14 OTHER ASSAULT FORGERY FRAUD PROPERTY VANDALISM WEAPONS OTHER SEX NARCOTIC FAMILY CHILDREN DWI LIQUOR LAWS DISORDERLY OTHER PART II TOTAL GRAND TOTAL ARRESTS EXCEPT TRAFFIC Adults 115 Juveniles 44 TOTAL 159 I OFFENSES hURDER RAPE ROBBERY ASSAULT BURGLARY ^RCENY AUTO THEFT! ARSON PART I TOTAL »JL liUVlv Offenses Unfounded Total Known Offenaes Total Offense Cleared by Arrest 1 X Nuinber Cleared by Arrest Persons Under 18 % Nuinber 1 1 • 7 7 14 1 72 2 70 17 12 2 2 1 1 81 2 79 16 13 2 2 ' 9 ■ 9 100 9 •tototo1 1 33 33 60 20 1 1 100 1 38 38 15 6 - 2 7 50 -__________]__________• 6 6 100 6 ___ • 45 45 100 45 32 32 100 32 18 6 8 8 50 4 16 16 68 11 191 191 70 135 4 9 272 2 270 54 __________iia _____1“ 4_________11------------- bTHER ASSAULT FORGERY * FRAUD 5 |>ROPERTY VANDALISM WEAPONS OTHER SEX NARCOTIC 'AMILY CHILDREN OWI ^IQUOR LAWS )ISORDERLY OTHER l>ART II TOTAL PRANP TOTAL \RRESTS EXCEPT TRAFFIC I Adults 136_Juveniles _34_TOTAL 170 OFFENSES OffensesKnown Unfounded TotalOffenses Total Offense Cleared by Arrest X Cleared by Arrest Persons Under 18 MURDER RAPE ROBBERY ASSAULT BURGLARY LARCENY AUTO THEFT ARSON PART I TOT iL OTHER ASSAULT FORGERY * ^RAUD PROPERTY I'ANDALISM WEAPONS )THER SEX NARCOTIC ■AMILY CHILDRE )WI ilOUOR LAWS aSORDERLY •THER ART II TOTAL . 1 •1 9 9 1 1 11 1 10 - — _2_ _ _ _- - -2_ _ _ _ _ • 2 7 _ 100 7 I . 13 13 . 100 13 5 5 100 5 20 13• 3 66 2 10 10 90 9 40 40 77 31 2 1 1 - - -3_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _1 c o -3 1 - -2- - - - - -J_ _ _ _ _ RAND TOTAL Adults Juveniles TOTAL CITY OF ORONO December 88 THIS SAME MONTH THIS YR. LAST YR. Year-end TN.qFS .'month T.A.«^T year to date to DAT£ ARRESTS ■t 1 6 11 189 215 •t 2 52 30 468 494 Adult«? 38 ifflc 114 96 1709 1180 Juv. ^ t 3 5 9 104 108 Citat-ions t 4 33 54 491 523 Warninas t 5 142 120 1925 1830 Total Year Arresti TOTAL ORONO 352 320 4881 4340 Adt-326 Juv-63 CITY OF LONG LAKE rt 1 6 85 68 rt 2 1 11 171 '4 Adult?5 af flc 3R 21 51^ ^Juv- ^ rt 3 3 0 41 34 Citations 68 rt 4 16 16 126 137 Warninas 8 rt 5 52 42 558 571 Total Year Arrest TOTAL LONG LAKE 127 96 1495 1271 Adt-115 Juv-44 CITY OF SPRING PARK rt 1 6 9 81 102 rt 2 19 6 191 165 Adults ^ affic 30 16 344 195 Juv. Q rt 3 3 1.48 30 Citations rt 4 9 17 L75 176 Warninas ^ irt 5 39 25 569 399 f •»Total Year Arrests TOTAL SPRING PARFj 106 74 1408 lOb y Adt-136 Juv-34 BEACH irt 1 0 0 11 16 irt 2 1 4 40 32 2Adults ‘affic 8 4 94 91 0Juv. irt 3 0 0 10 7 Citations 3.6 irt 4 4 1 38 24 Warninas 3.0 art 5 11 7 137 125 Total Year Arrests TOTAL MTKA BEACH 24 16 330 295 Adt- 0 JUV-/ lAND TOTALS 609 ' 506 8119 6989 3TAL ICR REPORTS Year to Date All lAFFTC CITATIONS 498 294 5926 • 2938 Adult Arrest 607 3N HAZARD TAGS 45 60 766 419 Juv Arrest 148 3TAL CONTACTS nrr T-aVo snrina Park: MCK oeadTl Total Warn per City " Citation " 442 3492 THIS MONTH CITY OF ORONO SAME MONTH THIS YR.LAST YR DECEMBER. 1987 Part /11 11 215 213 r*. r n-o 1 ^art^2 30 27 494 421 Adults Traffic 96 79 1180 1072 Juv. 2 Part 3 9 12 10 8 182 Citations 20 4 ^art 4 54 50 523 517 Warnings -^art 5 120 183 1830 2562 Total Year Arrests TOTAL ORONO 320 362 4350 4967 Adt-262 Juv-69 CITY OF LONG LAKE Part 1 6 7 68 81 ^art r 11 12 164 145 Adults ^0 "raffle 21-23 29 8 215 Juv. 1 Part 3 0 4 34 58 Citations ^^ Part 4 16 9 137 126 Warninas ^ Part 5 42 48 570 728 Total Year Arrests TOTAL LONG LAKE 96 ■10 3 1271 1353 Adt-83 Juv- 5 CITY OF SPRING PARK ’art 1 o 4 10 2 109 .’art 2 6 10 16*^185 Adults ^ Traffic 16 6 195 167 Juv. ^ Part 3 1 3 30 44 Citations Part 4 17 19-176 196 Warninas 16 Part 5 25 33 399 552 Total Year Arrests TOTAL SPRING P.ARK 74 75 1067 1253 Adt- 69 Juv- 15 CITY OF MINN ETONKA BEACH Part 1 0 5 16 25 Part 2 4 1 32 29 Adults 4 Traffic 4 10 91 80 Juv. 0 Part 3 0 1 7 13 Citations 20 Part 4 1 3 24 35 Warninas ^ Part 5 7 19 125 170 Total Year Arrests TOTAL MTKA BEACH 16 39 29 5 352 Adt -15 Juv- 6 GRAND TOTALS 506 579 69 89 7925 TOTAL ICR REPORTS Year to Date - All TRAFFIC CITATIONS 294 Adult Arrest-429 NON HAZARD TAGS 60 Juv. Arrest- 95 TOTAL CONTACTS Orono Lon a Lake Sorina Park Mtka Beach Total Warn per Citv " Citation 246 2545 66 6 30 25 278 4188.10(51) TO' Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator FROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director • DATS: March 16, 1989 SUBJECT: 1988 Police Department Operations - Financial Attached are schedules comparing the 1988 actual expenditures to the budgets for the police department operations in the base contract, and the additional manpower contracts for Long Lake and Spring Park. Also attached is a copy of the 1988 cost distribution by city and the resulting amount due to or from each city. The 1988 costs are $42,085 under budget. The amount under budget is made up of three parts; the base contract is under budget $36,499; the Long Lake additional manpower is over budget $2,913; and the Spring Park additional manpower is under budget $8,500. The net effect of the 1988 final contract costs is that Long Lake will be credited $9,550 in 1989, Minnetonka Beach will be credited $4,360 in 1989, and Spring Park will be credited $20,498 in 1989. These are a result of lower than anticipated costs and higher than anticipated revenues from the State for "Police Town Aid" and for the POST state aid for schooling. c: # •10A(51) CITY OF I ROHO ACTUAL COST DISTRIBOTIOH BT FABTICTFART COMPARED TO BSTIilAISD COST OISTRIBUTIOll BX ?ARTICIPABT 1988 BODGBT TBAR MINNETONKA SPR. a ■ ESTIMATED COST DISTRIBUTION ORONO LONG LAKE BEACH PARK 7TAL Composit % applied except to Contract Charge 70.94t 13.05% 6.46% 9.55«xcO.000% Base Budget Administration $462,422 46,242 $ 8S.07J 8,507 $ 42,079 4,208 $ 62,246 6,225 $651,820 65,182 Total Police Town Aid Credit (1986-87) 508,664 (18,516) 93,580 (3,407) 46,287 (1,685) 68,471 (2,492) 717,002 (26,100) Total Net of Town Aid Contract Charge 490,148 90,173 18,620 44,602 9,210 65,979 13,624 690,902 41,454 Total $490,148 $10j,733 $ 53,812 $ 79,603 $732,356 Additional Manpower Town Aid Credic (1987-88) $124,82*: (8,7JL! $166,915 (11,600) $291,740 (20,300) Contract Charge uo,i:5 f ,968 155,315 9,319 271,440 16,287 Total $123,093 $164,634 $287,727 GRAND TOT\L ESTIMATED COST $490,148 $231,886 $ 53,812 $7)4,237 $1,020,083 ACTUAL COSTS DISTRIBUTION Gross Costs Administration $430,671 43,067 $ 79,226 7,922 $ 39,218 3,922 $ 57,?' 5. 092 709 Total Police Town Aid Credit (1987-88) 473,739 (23,618) 87,14!? (4,J15) 43,140 (2,151) 63,:/ (3,180. ,801 .^3,294) Total Net of Town Aid Contract Charge 45U '20 d2,503 1\ 096 40,989 8,4«3 60,5«5 12,511 634,507 38,070 Total 7450,120 $ 99,399 $ 49,452 $ 73,106 $672,577 Addition«1 Manpower Town Aid Credit (1987-88) $127,738 (12,230) $158,415 (16,307) $280,153 (28,537) Total Net of Totm Aid Cantract Charge U5, 508 6,930 14* 8. «« 257,616 15,456 Total GRAND TOTAL ACrU»t COST $450,120 5 2,'38 mx - mm $22. j37 $ 49,452 $150,634 $223,740 $273,072 ■■■■■■■a $945,649 Actual Costs Over (Under) Coats $ (9,549)$ (4,360)$(20,497)$(74,434) Charge (Credit) to 19$' Billing Date 07/01. . . Billing Date 10/01/ >9 $ (4,775) (4,775) $ (2,180) (2,180) $)10,249) (10,249) TOTAL CRAROB (CREDl $ (9,550)$ (4,360)$(20,498) * n " J 4188.10B(51) cm OP OBONO POLICE mARtMOn* 1988 BGDCZT tEAR WEL laSDED DBOaCER 31, 1968 Salaries - Regular Salaries - Overtime Salaries - Temporary Salaries - Severence Salaries - Holiday (Driion) P4K.H.A. P• Hospitalization Insurance Life Insurance Worker Condensation Insurance Office SidPlies Motor Fuels and Lubricants Clothing & Personal Equipment Building & Grounds Maint. Stdplies Equipment Parts & Access Books & Periodicals Training Supplies Legal Consulting Other Consulting Telephone Postage Printing & Publishing Utilities Radio Rental Building Rental Maintenance - 0..fice Equipment - Automotive Bqui . *t - Misc Moment - Bui 'Cou. JanitoL -ce LCdS - Services LOGIS - u . . recessing Meetings, Conferences & School Insurances Memberships Travel, Mileage. Parking Licenses & Taxes Capital Outlay - Buildings - Office Furniture & Bg^p - Automotive Equipmmit - Other Equipment POST State Aid Reimbursement TOTAL BUDGET $350,304 10,194 500 8,000 9,165 43,670 3,760 18,820 2,540 21,362 5,000 28,000 6,725 300 4.500 1,000 3,800 1.500 7.000 7.000 1,80C 2.500 2,900 6,000 8,250 3.500 U,000 1,200 1.500 3,200 1,650 5,160 9,000 22,100 1,360 650 180 1,000 1,770 19,580 6,150 543,590 BASE CONTRACT ACIUAL $336,825 17,614 4,855 -0— 6,917 41,309 3,452 21,238 1,680 17,139 7,692 22,890 5,540 136 8,549 1,283 2,480 684 3,098 5.227 1,883 1,961 3,443 5,792 8.228 3,121 13,147 2,129 1,911 3,223 2,366 7,297 9,845 16,174 1,050 542 55 -0- 614 15,792 6,759 (6,848) $607,^§2 ACnJAL CNER (UNDER) BUDGET $(13,479) 7,420 4,355 (8,000) (2,248) (2,361) (308) 2 ^' > Vd60) (4,223) 2,692 (5,110) (1,185) (164) 4,049 283 (1,320) (816) (3,902) (lr773) 83 (539) 543 (208) (22) (379) 2,147 929 411 23 716 2,137 845 (5,926) (310) (108) (125) (1,000) (1,156) (3,788) 609 (6,848) $(36,4^) 4188.10C{51) CITT OF OROHO POLICE DEPARTMENT 1988 BUDGET YEAR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 r 1988 long LAKR ADDITIOW^T- »NPoNER Salaries - Regular Overtime Holiday P.E.R.A./P-l-C.A. Hospitalization & Life Ins. Workmens Compensation Insurance Clothing & Personal Equipment Memberships & Licenses TOTAL ADDITIONAL MANPOWER BUDGET $ 92,535 5,077 3,877 11,059 5,414 5,828 975 60 $124,825 asaasasa ACTUAL $ 92,168 7,949 4,046 13,491 5,146 4,392 546 -0- $127,738 actual over (UNDER) BUDGET $ 367 2,872 169 2,432 (268) (1,436) (429) (60) $ 2,913 aaaaaaaa SPRING PARE ADDITIONAL MANPOWER Salaries - Regular Overtime Holiday P.E.R.A./F.I.C.A. Hospitalization & Life Ins. Workmens Compensation Insurance Clothing & Personal Equipment Memberships & Licenses TOTAL ADDITIONAL MANPOWER $123,481 6,729 4,238 14,831 7,936 8,320 1,300 80 $166,915 $118,417 019 ,220 .472 .679 .866 742 -0- $158,415 aaaaaaaa $ (5,064) (710) 982 641 (1,257) (2,454) (558) (80) $ (8,500) STATE or MINNESOTA FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT COURT administration HCNNCRIN COUNTY OOVCRNMCNT CCNTCR MINNCAROLIS. MINNESOTA SSRS7 January 31, 1989 oV THf' Chief Melvin H. Kilbo Orono Police Department 1285 South Brown Road Box 86, Crystal Bay Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Chief KUbo: Pursuant to your phone request yesterday, reflected below are the number of citations issued in the listed communities for 1988. Orono 3,364 Spring Park 1,174 Long Lake 887 Minnetonka Beach 263 Below are the 1988 fine revenues tor each community: Total Revenues T/C Fines Fees Taxed Net Forfeited Ball Highway Patrol 1/3 NG's Fine Total Orono 148.452.67 10.221.00 138.231.67 1,625.00 ■ $139,856.67 Spring Park 30.195.00 3.117.00 36.078.00 —• 36.078.00 Long Lake 44.294.50 2,705.00 41,589.50 370.00 ■ 41,959.50 Minnetonka Beach 12,059.00 800.00 11,259.00 750.00 10.83 ■ 12.019.83 Please do not hesitate to call if you need more information. Sincerely,^ lack Muller Assistant Court Manager JM/jw cc: Paul Chaussee 4589.6 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat DATE: April 5, 1989 SUBJECT: Police Equipment Acquisition k A Attachment: A. Police Equipment Memo Dated 4/5/89 ISSUE - Authorization for expenditure of equipment for squad cars not budgeted in the 1989 Budget. INTRODUCTION - Subsequent to the budget cycle last fall a new product was made available to consolidate the radios, siren and equipment switching for squads into a unit mounted on the inside roof of the car. This would eliminate the "equipment tree" currently in the squads. DISCUSSION - The elimination of the equipment in the center position on the floor does allow the mounting of the new Mobile Digit Terminals to be placed in that position. If we retain the current arrangement these would be placed in the front passenger seat, reducing some ride along possibilities. The net total equipment acquisition cost is approximately $2,010 which is unbudgeted. It is anticipated that these would be acquired for the other 3 squads in next year's budget. (This is currently the only product like this available.) These will probably last 6-7 years which means 3-4 "squad lifetimes".) The new squads are now available and it would be appropriate to acquire these at this time and install in the new squads instead of transferring the present arrangement and then installing the new at a later date or waiting for a couple of years until they are sold. Streichers is the desired distributor as it is located in Plymouth rather that St. Paul (Road Rescue). Each change over involves 3 personnel to deliver and pickup (old squad, new squad plus transporter of the other two.) Purchase from low quotation is not required. ALTERNATIVES 1. Authorize acquisition. 2. Not authorize an unbudgeted expenditure. 3. Table. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the City Council authorize the acquisition for this equipment for 3 squads for a net total increase of $2,010 not presently budgeted. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by __, the Orono Council authorizes the acquisition "ol 3 "Vehicle Command Modules" for a total net cost of acquisition and installation of $2,010 over the $1,500 presently budgeted for change over of equipment on the three squad cars. Ayes _$ Nays _. cc: Mel Kilbo, Police Chief Tom Kuehn, Finance Director DATE:April 5, 1989 TO I Mark Bernhardson FROM 3 Mel Kilbo. Chiet Attached are three bids tor installinq command module tor our new squads. Intormation on use and ne:?d tor these units are in Lt. Cheswick's memo, and are stated quite well. Money tor ' hese units was not budgeted. However, we have money available because Hennepin County has elected not to charge tor M.D.T. unit rental durinq i989 as thev are not tully operational. We budgeted :^4f5uO tor this rental. Installation costs were included in the budget. I recommend the Council select Streichers as the vendor and installer at total cost ot ^1169 each each not bj.idgeted) as they have a tive year, SO,000 mile warranty. DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: INTEROFFICE ME!10 April 5, 1989 Chief Kilbo Lt. Cheswick Vehicle Command Module As per our previous discussion, I am submitting information in regard to the vehicle command module, model AC-lOOl-F, manufactured by Automotive Prototype Enqineerinq, Inc. These units are presently being installed in squad cars not only nationwide, but many in the metro and Lake area. The unit eliminates the typical front seat clutter thereby allowing for no more trees for equipment to be stationed on, cai be installed twice as fast as conventional systems, reducing fleet "down" time. They require no further drilling which assures a higher vehicle resale value. They allow for easy removal and reinstallation from vehicle to vehicle, and they also accept all proper radio units. The vehicle command module is a ceiling mounted unit that contains all the switches and controls for the squad. The module contains custom designed switch panel that integrates advance switching gear, each switch carrying a minimum o^ 20 amps and has its own fuse. It has a complete siren control head, including radio rebroadcast PA, siren tones, and a manual siren and air horn. It * also has twin high in”4ensity spot lights that permit the officer to shine the light where it is wanted without being backlit, as with factory vehicle lights. It allows for two-way radio mounting, compatible with our present radio system and contains a hiah fidelity speaker located close to the officers ear for clear communication. This description of the command module I had given you allows ^or a more compact and controlled equipment center, thereby removing the clutter of the radios, siren, lights, and switches presently existing in the squad cars. This new command module also will be o^ benefit in several other areas: One, being in the form of safety to the officer, allowing for less protruding metal objects near the officers knees and legs. It also provides for the officer to get to the vehicles heating and cooling switches, now presently covered by the existing tree. This officer had the opportunity to observe this overhead command module in several lake area cars, as well as the Hennepin County Sheriffs Departments*’ vehicles. The unit has alleviated a cluttering of the front dash board and allowing for space for the new MDT terminals currently being installed in the Orono squad cars. I have requested several bids from two differant police equipment companies. These bids will give the price of the overhead command module, the credit for the existing siren in a trade-in. Also included is the cost for installation of the modules as well as a transfer of equipment from old squad cars into new squad cars. -2- First the existing quote from Road ^.escue, Inc. at 1133 Rancon Street, St. Paul. This bid was submitted to be by Michael J. Dow from Equipment Sales. It shows a nrice o^ $840 for quantity of 1-5 APE Overhead Console with siren, tanduit wire harness and switches. Less, credit for our existina siren of $200, for a total of $640. This does not incluf''o installation and the price for the installation and transfer of equipment will be forthcomina. The second quotation was from Don Streicher Guns of 10911 West Highway 55, Minneapolis. The price of the overhead vehicle command module was $320 with a suaaested optional switch of $30. The installation of the over'-^-^d vehicle command module into an> existina squad would be $199. nd a nrice for installation of overhead command module onto a new squad and transferring of equipment listed from an old squad car into a new squad, including light bar, siren speaker, two radios with antennae, vehicle partition, wia-waas for ^laa^iiahts =^nd chanrreo'f^iT- of fronf or-i 11 i-irrbt': to be $419. The total cost less trade in for the siren would be $1169. Both these companies are the two exclusive authorized distributor and installation centers for the APE Overhead Switch Consoles. Road Rescue will be submitting to me their cost of installation and transferring of equipment later on this week. I also had contact with two other organizations presently involved in the switch over and installation of equipment. The bid for these installation and transfer^ costs of equipment will be forthcomina. Neither of these latter two businesses sell the APE overhead console and were strictly contacted for a quote on the transfer of equipment. In conclusion, I feel that this overhead console will allow for i more cost effective squad car changeover, a more streamlined overhead console and equipment system, but allow ^or more room for the officer and will make space more available for the installation and ease of use of the new MDT*s. DON STREICHER GUNS a Jenniges -Tonne, Inc. company Professional Police Equipment Distributors P.O BOX 41398 10911 WEST HIGHWAY 55 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55441 (612) 546 -1155 P.O BOX 27344 2465 SOUTH 84TH STREET MILWAUKEE. Wl 53227 (414) 541-4164 (S Q- 23608 n.y Orono Police Department LT. CHESWICK 445 Brown Road Orono, MN 55356 WE ARE PLEASED TO QUOTE AS FOLLOWS: 473-7710 TOLL FREE ORDER LINES 1-800-752-4249 MINNESOTA 1-800-328 4815 OTHER VOUR INQUIRY phone EST. SHIPPING DATE TERMS F.O.B.date 45 Days ARO Net 15 Ship Pt.03/16/89 ♦::QUANT1TY.-i-OESCRlPTION . A v .v^AMOUNTitf open: open; open (open) OVERHEAD VEHICLE COfWND MODULES; Automotive Prototypes . Engineering, Inc.: Model AC-lOOl-F . . . . . . . . . $820.00 System Includes: Module Assembly Radio Head Brkt.** Radio Spkr. Assy.** Siren Amplifier Assy. Switch Control Center with:-4-H.D. SPST Lighted Rocker Switchles . ' 2-H.D.'SPDT-Center off Lighted Rojcker Switc CompleteJ^ire Harness with fuse system •' Wire Carrier, Panduit or Foam** DuaT.Map Lights** / ' Rear’Seat Light**. Suggested Optional Switching: - \...i. . . . . . . $30.00 Progressive s'*ide switch in position #1 replaci i /the standard rocker^switch.* \ ! ! i t ^ ’ i 'SERVICE OF NEW EQUIPMENT: - / Installation cf the Over^iead Vehicle Conmand Module • onto an existing squad. .. . SERVICE OF NEW EQUIPMENT: ' / •' Installation of OvechM^ Command Module onto a new squad and traTnsfering pf^6quipment listed from an old squad_ijito .a.^fiew squad. . Incl.: Light^Bar, Siren Speaker, Two Radios wit^ / Antennas, Vehicle Partition.... **Indicates items soiw competitors charge extra for... ##Inc‘’udes our 5 yr./50,000 mile waranty 0*^ our installa TRADE-IN ALLOWANCE OF USED EQUIPMENT: SIREN/SWITCH CONTROL SYSTEMS, P.S.E. Mdl. 3692L4 $199.00 $389.00 tion compo ($100.00) each per syst. §§ each ## lents each ORIGINAL Steve Jenniges, Pres BID/QUOTATfCN FORM MEDICAUANCILLARY EQUIPMENT Dale Bid No.. Purchaser: Address: jflr HL ROAD RESCUE, INC. VKHL1133 RANKIN STREET • ST PAUL. MINNESOTA 55116 . (612) 699 5588 WATS: Minn.: 800-652-0208 ^ ^ ^ Nat. Wide: 800-328-3804 ; ^JlCi A/U 1 i __Contact: ^ T~ .>wC(Cv^ m .Telephone:. City. State. Zip:. Code #Quantity Description Price Each Extended Total /Ijir' Ct,vsc<.£- KCl-F kry ------ / ------ 3 Cu/7\^rtrrrs fh,L /V <C-^ccr’S? /<• {. /n 7m.. A.C. (''X'lr ■* Prepared by.///(t r ~.Road Rescue. Inc. QUOTATION TOTAL MARTIN ’S NAVARRE “66’ 3340 Shoreline Dr. P.O. Box 32 Navarre. MN 55392 471-Q9827(7/60 I a AcJ:os sdr.'^ s 3'i.,V*+ «<»- 7. '^'^y ;:rT-v —V /L<^ zz^Ayc/uJ^J i ^ A ,^ ''' '1 ' <5-n^/' , iey.A^^i-ke Ao;.- pev^^A,eJ ^ ^ jo,oi> f^y ■5’^-'<»^’r '/■£> > A«'‘o< ^’-*^<'5 JUT: -^^C<i>$oo p^y~ 'hrat>/i “TO^ / Servir ■ i a/ce Minnetonka area since 1954 i CD'v^kjuSl ~ 6 Vi?/ c Turn your fleet oh with our ^ AC-1001 Vehicle Command Module.. \ \M. ★ Eliminates typical front seal [ ★ Requires no holes or drilling, clutter - “No more trees!” j assuring higher vehicle resale value. ★ Con be instrtled twice as fast as I ^ ^“ily removed and re-i.istalled conventional systems, reducing vehicle to vehicle. fleet “down time.”★ Accepts all popular racio units STREICHER ‘S Professional Police Squlpnienl a JENN^E&TONNE INC. company 10911 West Highway 55, MInneapc*. '' Minnesota 55441 1-800-64:>-6075 MINNESOTA Monday - Friday. 9:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m.(612)546-1155 AC-1001 Vehicle Command Module Features I J'c High imoact resistant A.B.S. plastic shell Heavy duty 20 rocker switches lit legends —aBdSSBa I ■Rear compartment light Speaker system -----Twin high-intensity drop spots i-r •Siren control panel I ^-------Visor “tell tair indicator Separate fuses The AC-1001 is compatible with all popula- two-way radios providing fast mounting and removal Custom designed switch panel that integraies the most advanced switching gear avaiJal>le. Each switch carries a minimum of 20 amps and has its own fuse. Complete siren control head that has the most popular features, including radio rebroadcast/PA and siren tones of wail, yelp, hi-lo with manual siren and air horn. Twin high-intensity spotlights that permit the officer to shine the light where it is wanted without being back lit. as with factory vehicle lights. Convenient two-way radio mounting. C jmpatible with all popular radio systems, including Motorola, General Electric and Midland. High fidelity speaker located close to the officer's ear for clear communication. •SIS',Complete IrtStaNatW} Also 33189.5 TOj Mayor and City Council FROMx Mark B. Bernhardson, Ci^y Administrat DATE: March 31r 1989 SUBJECT: Hennepin Parks - Eminent Domain Hearing Attachment: A. Metro Council Letter Received 3/27/89 ISSUE - Provision of information to Council regarding process and hearing on developme-'t of Lake Minnetonka Regional Park. INTRODUCTION - As you will nota in the Attachment, Hennepin Parks has been attempting to do initial negot.ations with the property owners for acquisition of the land in the designated Lake Minnetonka Park. They are now initiating the procedure for eminent domain with Metro Council, as required by the Legislation with a hearing scheduled for May 9, 1989. DISCUSSION - At this point the only issues the City would have to present at such a public hearing would relate to the need for the Regional Park together with the process by which it is being acquired. It is doubtful that either would be issues that would be dealt with in this hearing. In a related item the City of Minnetrista has not yet decided on an appeal although the landowners in the area have. ALTERNATIVES - 1. Accept the information. 2. Direct submission of testimony through written means. 3. Provide attendance/testimony at the hearing. 4. Take no action. RECOMMBWDATION - It is recommended that the City submit i**s position on these issues in writing for the official record. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, Seconded by _, that the Council direct staff to submit its position on the Park so it is part of the official record. Ayes _, Nays _. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING ACQUISITION OF LAND THROUGH EMINENT DOMAIN FOR LAKE MINNETONKA REGIONAL PARK BY SUBURBAN HENNEPIN REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT The Metropolitan Council has set a public hearing for May 9» 19ft9f to consl-ier whether acquisition of parcels of land In the city of Mlnnetrlsta for a proposed Lake Minnetonka Regional Park should proceed through eminent domain. Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District requested that the Council set the hearing pursuant to Minnesota Laws of 1988, Chap. 686, Sec. 26. PUBLIC HEARING IN. JRMATION When: Where: Who will be notified: How to participate: Any questions: Tuesday, May 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m. Minnetonka City Council Chambers 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, MN (On Minnetonka Boulevard, at the Williston Road intersection; about a mile west of Interstate Hwy. 494.) Officials of local government in Hennepin County, regional park implementing agencies and Interested parties. 1. Attend the hearing. To register to speak, call the Council's community outreach secretary at 291-6500 or sign up at the meeting. 2. Mail comments to: Jack Maurltz, parks planner Metropolitan Council Hears Park Centre 230 E. Fifth St. St. Paul, MN 55101 (The hearing record will remain open through May 23, 1989.) Call the Council's parka and matro governance division and talk to Jack Maurltz at 291-6602. To request copies of the document, call 291-8140. (over) ACQUISITION OF LAND THROUGH EMINENT DOMAIN FOR LAKE MINNETONKA REGIONAL PARK BY SUBURBAN HENNEPIN REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT INTRODUCTION Suburban Hennepin Regional Park Diatrict (SHRPD) haa requeated the Metropolitan Council to aet a public hearing to consider findings necessary for acquiring land for a Lake Minnetonka Regional Park through eminent domain* BACKGROUND At the reconmendation of the Council» SHRPD prepared an acquisition master plan for a Lake Minnetonka regional park which the Council approved Apr. 9. 1987 The proposed park contains land in three parcels, all located in the city of Minnetrista. The city haa not consented to the park, maintaining that it is too large, among other reasons. The request for the Council to aet a public hearing is pursuant to Minnesota Laws, Chap. 686, Sec. 26. The law enables SHRPD to acquire land for the regional park even if the local municipality withholds consent. In this case, Minnetrista sued SHRPD, claiming the law permitting acquisition of the park to be unconstitutional. On Dec. 15, 1988, Hennepin County Judge Roberta Levy denied the city's motion for Judgment and granted SHRPD's contrary motion, saying, in effect, that -he law may proceed. Since then, SHRPD has begun negotiations by contacting the owners of the three parcels within the approved master plan boundary. At the hearing, SHRPD will report on the status of negotiations. If negotiations have not resulted in acquisition by the day of the hearing, SHRPD may request authorization to acquire the land by eminent domain. To consent, the Council must find, in accord with Subd. 3 of Chap. 686, 'ec. 26, thats — Acquisition of the property is in the public interest; — Negotiations for acquisition of the property have not resulted in acquisition of land by purchase; — The proposed acquisition is consistent with the approved master plan maintained by the Metropolitan Council; and istrict is able to carry out the plan and operate the regional park MFT»Of»*>LfTAN OX'NCIL • Wrar« Fhfi <'f^rrr • fhmJ • a/.’ 'W a'.it)y7 33189.6 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Adrainistrato DATS: March 31, 1989 SUBJECT: Highway 12/Safety Improvement Attachments: A. Highway 12 Safety Improvement Memo Lated 1/4/89 a. MnDOT District 5 Letter Dated 1/31/89 C. MnDOT Letter Dated 3/17/89 ISSUE - Presentation of information regarding upcoming Information meeting for April 25, 1989, by MnDOT on the proposed safety improvement. INTRODUCTION - As you previously seen the improvement being presented is” being taken to a public informational meeting in April. DISUCSSION - The City staff is hoping to have meetings with property owners both north and south of Highway 12 in the corridor regarding frontage roads and this may have an impact on the issues that MnDOT is considering as far as controlled access right-of-way acquisition and related costs. To the extent that there is access available. through frontage road, it should reduce the cost for acquisition fn the controlled access along here and make the safety improvement a more viable option. The meeting will be held from 4-7 P.M. and people may come and have it explained at their leisure. MnDOT has sent notices to abutting land owners. (Attachment B outlines costs entailed in using storm sewer instead of ditches and the amount of land savings by that amount. This is informational only at this time.) ALTERNATIVES 1. Accept the information. 2. Table for updates on meetings with the landowners. 3. Take no action. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council accept the information and table to the May 8, 1989 meeting for a further update. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that the Council accept the information and table discussion of the item to its May 8, 1989 meeting. Ayes _, Nays _. 1489.. TO: Mayor and City Council FHOMs Mark E. Bernhardson, Aaministrator|(i^”^ DATS: January A, 1989 SDBJBCT: Highway 12 - Proposed 19i»l Safety Improvements Attachments:A. Highway 12 Memo Dated 12/6/88 B. Minnesota Highway Funding Schismatic/Research Department/Minnesota House of Representatives “ Identification of issues for submission of initial reaction to MNDot for the proposed 1991 safety improvements between North Brown Road and Old Crystal Bay Road. INTRODUCTION — As noted in Attachment A the staff presented to Council an initial layout for the proposed improvement. Subsequent to that this layout has been shown to the City's Engineerp its consultant planner/ together with property owners Rebers and Otten (At a meeting on January A, 1989). Attachment 3 is presented as an informational item only. DICUSSION - Following a review of this item the following issu<^s have been identified: !• Right-Of-Wa y (ROW) - While the diagram indicates the development will be within the current 100 foot right- of-way that exists in Orono^ the discussions have indicated that they would desire another 30 or 40 feet for the development along a substantial portion of the routep which would all be taken from the north side of the highway. The centerline of the highway would be shifted to the north as the development in Orono is less than that in Long Lake. There are two issues that create the need for more right-of-way: a. Drainage - The primary reason for the additional right-of-way is to facilitate the 32 feet of ditch needed on both sides if this is to be drained with ditches. The City has asked MNDot to explore the use of a curb section and storm sewer as a way to lessen the need for increased right-of-way. b. Direct Access — The other reason is because of the numerous curb cuts that are proposed to continue along the highway. Even though these have been substantially lessened, there is still a number of them that create a need for turn lanes and channalization at those points. These are primarily, although not exclusively, in Long Lake and increased controlled access and the use of service or other existing streets can help lessen the width needed. 2. Controlle Access - As noted above, controlled access assists .’lot only in lessening the width but also assists in the safety and local movement of traffic, keeping the volumes off the highway. The City has, at a previous meeting with MNDot, asked it tht=y would look at assisting in the funding of both the north and south service roads that the City has proposed in its Comprehensive Plan. Such an approach may also be feasible in helping Long Lake reduce the number of curb cuts. You may note on the plan that a service road was platted in front of several of the businesses between Virginia and Willow in Long Lake. 3. Channelization - Channelization does assist in directing traffic and may lessen some of the accidents, particularly at Willow and 12. 4. Siqnalization - Willow/12 - With the channelization at the intersection would accomodate a future light. In informal discussions it is the expectation inat cross traffic at this intersection would meet the warrants by the time it was developed in 1991. The City has additionally broached with MNDot the possibility of including traffic counts from curb cuts in the vicinity of the intersection, so that those cross traffic counts could be used in tr.ying to meet the warrant. The City staff will be looking for a response on this issue as part of the comments. The installation of channelization now will substantially lower the cost that had been anticipated for signalization. 5. North Brown/Virqinia Intersection - An alternative plan shown regarding the safety improvement is the realignment of North Brown Road with Virginia Avenue, this alternative does align traffic and may improve site distances with North Brown together with reducing some of the multiple curb cuts found east of Virginia Avenue. It is something, however, that the City of Long Lake may not desire as Virginia Avenue is segregated between the residential area and commercial by directional "One Way" signs. The impact in Orono is that it would place all of North Brown in Orono together with probably placing the retention pond for the Rebers* property on the east side of the newly alligned road. It may also have an impact on the accesses for the Bank and townhouses. 6. Funding - While proposed as a safety improvement, the amount of funding, if any, from the City of Orono should be refunded. It is expected that they may request the City to share funding for ROW and/or storm sewer and curb and gutter. At the present these seem to be the major items of concern identified and ones that would be addressed by the staff with Minnesota Department Transportation in preparation of the plans. ALTERNATIVES - Provision of additional issues identified by Councilraeinbers. 2. Comment on direction the City desires to have these issues resolved. 3. Table for further discussion. 4. Request MNDot get definitive responses from Long Lake on their concerns regarding the plans. 5. Take no action. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that once the Council has identified any further issues that a letter be transmitted to MNDot outlining the City of Orono's concerns and recommending that they work directly with Long Lake regarding their concerns if this project is to go ahead. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by __, seconded by __, that the staff be directed to transmitt the City's concerns regarding the safety upgrade indicating that overall the upgrade is appropriate and an improvement. Ayes __, Nays. cc: City of Long Lake To: Mark E. Bernhardsoiir City Administrator Froa: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director ^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date: December 6, 1988 Subject: Safety Improvements Highway 12 - Brown Road North to Old Crystal Bay Road - - - - - -cr—— Recently we were advised that MnDot was proposing safety improvements on Highway 12 from Brown Road North to Old Crystal Bay Road. These safety improvements are scheduled for construction in 1991. On September 19th, City staff met with MnDot representatives to discuss the safety improvements. At that time the proposed improvement was the placement of a center lane for right and left turn movements. We stated that we would review the proposed improvement and meet with them again at a time designated by them. On December 5th, City staff met with MnDot to review the most recent proposed for the safety improvements. The proposal now shows some curb cut removal, on the north side, channeling traffic for right and left turn lanes at Willow and Highway 12 and raised medians in designated areas throughout the project as well as a rea-l ignment of Brown Road North, intersection. If the above changes were to take pxace, they desire to acquire 35*-40* of additional right-of-way, all on the north side of the highway. We «.dvised them that because of the ch2uige in zoning along the Highway 12 Corridor in Orono there would probably be frontage roads constructed to relieve traffic on Highway 12. They indicated that that may make a difference as to whether they would have to acquire as much additional right-of-way and that funds may be available to assist in the cost of the frontage roads. Attached for review is a reduced copy of the proposed plan for the safety improvements. City staff is in the process of review but would appreciate Council*s input on this matter. Key issues include: * Curb cut reductions * Limitation of left turns * Design for signal * Right-of-way * Brown Road alignment Tb: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members \^]|h From: Mark E. Bemhardson, City Administratoi|J Forwarded for Council review. The staff will transmit an initial response to MnDot following the January 9, 1989 Council meeting. Proposed Motion; Moved by , ;^conded the information presented. Ayes S'nays that the Council accept i m>AM.ex)-r D Local Share of MVET Transfer Provisions The Board of Directors of Minnesota Good Roads adopted a resolution recommending the 1989 Legislatxire remove the 1991 "sunset” provision included in the 1988 Transportation Funding Bill so that any MVET revenue continue to go to the Highway User Tax Distribution Fund (which includes cities and counties) and not only to trunk highways and transit. Below and on reverse side of this sheet are charts detail ing the effective distribution of MVET funds before and after the "sunset" date in the current law. MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE TAX REVENUES WITH AKD WITHOUT LOCAL government share _______(F. Y. 1992 and 1993)__________ 1992 1993 With Local Without Local With Local Without Local Gov't Share Gov't Share Gov't Share Gov't Share Total HVET Revenue 252,385,000 252,385,000 263,490,000 263,490,000 MVET Revenue to Transportation (30X)75', 715,500 75,715,500 79,047,000 79,047,000 Kis«^way Share (75X)56,786,625 56,786,625 59,285,250 5P,285,250 Trunk Highway Fund 34,923,774 56,786,625 '36,460,429 59,285,250 County State Aid Fund 16,808,841 0 17,548,434 0 -- County Highways 16,329,789 0 17,048,304 0 -- Town Roads and Bridges 479,052 0 500,130 0 Municipal State Aid Fund 5,054,010 *0 5,276,387 0 Total Local Share of H.V.E.T.21,862,851 0 22,824,821 0 NOTE — "With Local Government Shai*e" means the distribution of M.V.E.T. revenue after f.y. 1991 as it would be if the constitutional formula (62-29-9) were retained. "Without Local Government Share" means the distribution of M.V.E.Ti revenue with the entire highway share goir.g to the Trunk High way Fund after f.y. 1991* as is provided in current law. - 2 - GRAOT RAPIDS; The expansion of Blandin taper highlights the increasing conflict logging and tourism. The aspen timber has to come down Trunk Highways 65. 6 and 169 after leaving the forest. Local officials have little tax base to draw on to encourage this industry and satisfy their road needs. The sunset of the M7ET counties and local goven ments In 1991 will result in a loss of $600,000 in Itasca County. The Blandin expansion is a $600 million investment in u economy and will result in twice the truck traffic. We need to think of the highways as the workplace of the trucker and continue to stress the safety and capacity needs of roads such as Itasca County Road 7. BEMIDJI; The Integration of transportation as an Important part of the economic picture, especially in farm products and wood products, and the necessity of an ef- Altematives to existing systems need to be explored and positive solutions acceptable to both metro and rural areas brought forward. While the trees are cut in the forest, two-thirds of the Jobs in the timber in dustry occur in the Twin Cities. Legislatively, the sunset pro vision in MVET after 199'^ nee^^s to be repealed and the State Senate needs to be convinced of the needs of the county and local systems, especially in Increasing the percentage of 10-ton roads. fective feeder road system is critical to the area. 'Zi FERGUS FALLS: Any transportation discussion needs to consider impact and benefits of industries such as tourism, agriculture and sugar beets on the entire state, including the metro areas. Bonding dollars for both state and local bridges are needed throughout the state. Resort associations need to get more Involved in the roads issues. Otter Tail County has 1,040 miles of Trunk Highways and 1,030 miles of State Aid roads, all blacktopped. Mn/DOT District 4 encompasses 1,700 miles of roads and 43% have Spring restrictions, the highest percentage of any district. Spring restrictions on T.H. 59 virtually isolate the City of Morris and cause solid waste management concerns. The community of Dalton and ■ its elevator sit at the end of 7-ton county roads. The local communities, business and beet haulers have been supportive of road issues. The social growth of the area has been impacted re cently and the diversion of MVET funds away from trans portation is not supported locally. (clockwise) Ross Evjen, B.K. Soby, Don Dean, Dick Borson. Lucky Shol, Dennis Berend 1 12^4.4 Mr Minnesota Department of Transportation W ||l B District 5 2055 No. Lilac Drive Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 DATE: January31,1989 TO: MarkBemhardson City of Orono P.O.Box 66 Ciystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: S.P. 2713-61 (TH12) Dear Mr. Bemhardson, (612)593- Q477 1 have studied the feasibility of using an urban type roadway desim in an effort to save right-of-way needed for oui HI 12 project For this estimate, 1 proposed the use of curb and gutter, (with it’s associated storm sewer construction) on the north side of TH 12 between the entrance to Washin^on Scientific Industries and the entrance to the Q-Superette. Using recent survey information, I determined that we would need approximately 20’ of additional R/w for the urban design with curb and gutter. This compares to 40’ of additional R/W width required for the rural design with ditches. The total R/W required in this area then, works out to be 2.6 acres if 40’ is taken, or 13 acres if 20’ is taken. With the help of our hydraulics experts, I estimated Orono ’s share of the cost of the additonal storm sewer. The cost would be approximately $48,000, which would allow R/W saving of approximately 13 acres. I can provide you with more detailed inmrmation if you wish. If you have any further questions, please feel fiee to call. Sincerely, David A. Solsmd Preliminary Design An Equal Opportunity Employer Minnesota Department of Transportation W ^TTWQitMCUr 0. 2055 No. Lilac Drive Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 (612) 593- DATE : March 17,1989 TO: MarkBemhardson City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 SUBJECT: S.P.2713-61 (TH 12) TH 12 Between West Brown Road and Old Crystal Bay Road in Long Lake and Orono; Construction of Left Turn Lanes with Raised Concrete Median and construction of additional Right Turn Lanes. Upcoming Public Open House Dear Public Official, The enclosed brochure briefly discusses a Trunk Highway 12 project currently scheduled for construction in 1991. This project may auect property and highway access, or may cause some temporary inconvenience dunng construction. We have scheduled an Open House/Public Hearing at the Orono High School in the cafeteria. The meeting will be on April 25,1989 from 4:00 to 8:00 pm. It will be an open house at which individuals may review the project, ask specific questions of MN/DOT representatives, and make public statements for the official recora. The open house will be followed by a presentation to the group at 7:00 pm. After this, until 8:00 pm, there will be an opportunity for individuals to ask additional questions and/or make public statements. I encourage you to attend this meeting, ask questions and make public statements in regard to the project. Preliminary project documentation, maps, drawings and other pertinent information are available for public inspection and copying at the Department of Transportation, Golden Valley office. The office is at 2055 North Lilac Drive in Golden Valley. If you have questions or comments you wish to make before the meetings please contact Mark Benson, Project Manager, at 593-8530 or Dave Solsrud at 593-8477. Sincerely, Mark D. Benson Enclosure An Equal Opportunity Employer 2 PROJECT AREA S.P. 2713-61 (TH 12) PROJECT SUMMARY TH 12’s Transportation Function TH 12 in Long Lake Lj essentially a rural, two-lane highway. It serves a high volume of commuter traffic, providing a link between the Metro Area’s 1-394 and the numerous cities to the west As development along the corridor west of Long Lake has ocairred, the highway has evolved to more and more of a local service route as well. The fact that the highway serves such a diverse group of travellers makes any solution to the problems these travellers face a complex, difficult, and in some cases, controversial decision. Project Need The accident rate on TH 12 is much higher than the district or the state-wide average for this type of roadway. Statistics for the calendar years of 1985, 1986 and 1987 show that the accident rate (in number of accidents per million vehicle miles travelled) has averaged 4.0. This is significantly higher than the District 5 average which is 2.3, or the state-wide average, which is 2.2. A study of accident types shows that the accidents are primarily rear end, left turn head-on, and right-angle. The accidents, caused as a result of vehicle turning movements, are concentrated at various intersections throughout the project The existing design of the roadway provides no refuge for left turning vehicles, and drivers typically use the shoulders and right turn lanes to bypass stopped vehicles creating, a very dangerous simation. Another factor contributing to the hi^ accident rate is the very high traffic volume. The demand often exceeds capacity, resulting in a very poor level ot service. The high volumes force turning traffic to wait longer for safe gaps, and encourage more risky maneuvers. Project Description The project proposed is basically a reconstruction of the highway. The two-lane design will be retained, hut the highway will be widened on the north side, permitting the construction of left turn lanes and raised concrete median between the two through lanes. All street intersections (except West Ind. Blvd.) will be served by left and ri^t turn lanes after completion of the project This will inaease safety and capacity by eliininating interruption to through traffic, and providing refuge for turning vehicles. Purpose of Public Meeting The purpose of holding a public meeting ii o that any individual who expects to be impacted by the project may conveniently discuss it with MN/DOT representatives and become fully informed about the project The meeting also provides MN/DOT with an opportunity to obtain oral and written comments from affected individuals. Comments for the official record will be accepted until Friday, May 9,1989. Right of Way Acquisition The property will be elocation Assistance and project will require purchase of additional Right of W^. purchased by MN/DOT in accordance with the 1970 Uniform Kc_________________ Keol Property Acquisition Policies Act passed by Congress, and the 1971 State Relocation Assistance Law. To help acquaint you with MN/DOTs Right of Way acquisition procedures, we have a booklet entitled "Guide for Property Owners" which further ei^lains the procedures involved. This booklet will be available at the meeting, or by calling the District Relocation Supervisor, Tom Skalberg (593-8515) or the District Right of Way Engineer, Earl Howe DATES MARCH 27, 1989 TOI MARK DERNHARDSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM3 MELVIN KILBO, CHIEF OF POLICE REs STEP PAY RAISE - OFFICER LARRY TOMCHECK Officer Larry Tomcheck will have completed hie third year of service on April 7, 1989- Officer Tomcheck's service has been adequate during this three years, the most noteable service being a rescue of a resident of a burning house for which he received council commendation as well as receiving honorable mention for officer of the year from the Minnesota Chiefs of Police Association. I request Officer Tomcheck's salary be raised from second year level of $=14,123 hourly to third year level of $15,692, based on 1988 labor contract, effective April 7, 1989. TO: FROM: Mayor and City Council Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato Forwarded recommending approval- PROPOSED MOTION — Moved by , seconded by _, to increase Officer Tomcheck's salary from $14,123 per hour to $15,692 per hous based on the 1988 labor contract, effective April 7, 1989. Ayes _, Nays _. 33189.8 TO: Mayor and City Council FBOM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato DATE: March 31, 1989 SDBJBCT: Ordinance 2.Of - Required Agenda Attachment: A. Ordinance Number 2.05 B. Draft of Proposed Revision ISSUE - Bring existing procedure and present into conformance with each other. INTRODUCTION - A recent review of Section 2.05 indicates that the existing Ordinance regarding format at the regular Council meetings is not within in the format that has been utilized for at least the last 9 to 10 years. ALTERNATIVES - A. Adopt Attachment B to conform with present procedure. B. Amend present procedure, to conform with existing ordinance. C. Table for further discussion. D. Take no action. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that Ordinance Number 2.05 be amended to conform to current practice. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by __, seconded by __, that the Council adopt Ordinance Number , Second Series as an amendment to Section 2.05 regarding the required order on the agenda. Ayes _, Nays_. /(T7A<U(MCMr A S 2.05 o SEC. 2.05. COUNCIL PROCBDUEE AT REGULAR MEETINGS. The City Clerk shall prepare the lollowing items; (1) an agenda for the forthcoming meeting; (2) a report from the City Administrator on administrative activities of the preceding month; (3) a compiled list of all claimants who have filed verified accounts claiming payment for goods or services rendered the City during the preced ing month, such list to be called the "Claim Report" and bearing headings "Claimant", "Purpose", and "Amount"; and, (4) a copy of all minutes to be considered. The City Clerk shall forthwith cause to be delivered or mailed to the Mayor and each Council member copies of all said documents. Roberts* Rules of Order (Newly Revised) shall govern all Council meetings as to procedural matters not set forth in the City Code. The order of business at regular meetings shall be as follows: 1. Call to Order. 2. Roll Call. 3. Determination of Quotum. 4. Consent Agenda, Routine items approved on one motion in the absence of a request for discussion. 5. Approval of Minutes. (Actual reading shall be waived in the absence of demand for reading. 6. Reports From beards and Commissions. 7. Meeting Opened in the Order Stated in the Agenda to Persons Requesting to Appear Before the Council, The presiding officer may advise any person appearing as to the amount of time allowed prior to his speaking, or later limit such time. Persons speaking shall give their name, address, and state their business. 8. Reports of Scaff Members. 9. Reports of Mayor and Council Members. 10. Meeting Opened to the Public. The presiding officer shall limit the time allowed. Persons speaking shall give their name, address, and state their business. 11. Licenses and Permits. 12. Payment of Claims and Approval for Payment of Claims and Appropriations. 13. Adjournment, ORONO CC (4-1-84) S 2.05 Matters inappropriate for consideration at a meeting, or not in the order specified, shall not be considered except (1) with the anani- mous consent of the members of the Councilr or (2) scheduled public hearings or bid lettings at the time stated in the notice. All requests for placement on the agenda, including payments, ™^st be filed seven days preceding the regular Council meeting at which it is to be considered. The position of City SBC. 2.06. CITY ADMIHISTHATOR. ':ubd. 1. Position Established. Administrator is hereby established. Subd. 2. Appointment and Removal. The City Adminis trator shall be appointed by the Council for an indefinite term. He shall not be removed except by affirmative action taken by the Council twice at two regular meetings held within sixty days. The action taken at the first such meeting shall be an expression of intent to vote thereon at the second such regular meeting not to be held sooner than ten days thereafter. If, completed six months of continuous service, the Council takes such action, the City Administrator may within thirty days after written notice of removal, request a public hearing which the Council must grant and which must be started within thirty days after the request. Subd. 3. Qualifications. The City Administrator shall be selected solely on the basis of his executive and administrative qualifications with special reference both to experience, formal education, as well as his knowledge of accepted practices pertaining to the duties of his office. Subd. 4. Duties. The City Administrator shall be the chief administrative officer of the City and he shall be respon sible to the Council for the proper administration of all affairs of the City and to that end shall have the power and shall be required to: A. Supervise the administration of all Departments, offices and divisions of the City except as otherwise provided by law and carry out any other responsibilities placed under , iurisdiction by this Chapter or by subsequent Council action. He ihall interview and screen all .!®Pcounc*l*beloremitted by law and may make recommendations to the Counc-1 before the Council makes any appointment; he may also for terminating and suspending ahemployee until the next Council meeting when the Council shall affirm, modify or rescind the suspension. B. Develop and issue all administrative rules, regulations and procedures necessary to insure the ing of all departments and offices under his jurisdiction as permitted by law and Council approval. OROMO CC 8 (4-1-84) ORDINANCE NO.SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2.05 0£* ORDINk.«CE NUMBER 2 ADOPTED APRIL 1, 1984, AND ENTITLED 'AH ORDINANCE RELATING TO COUNCIL PROCBDURBS AT REGULAR MEETINGS.” The City Council or Orono ordains: Section 2.05 of Ordinance Number 2 adopted April 1, 1984, and entitled "An Ordinance Relating to Council Procedure at Regular Meetings" is amended to read: COUNCIL PROCEDURE AT REGULAR MEETINGS. The City Clerk shall prepare the following items: (1) an agenda for the forthcoming meeting; (2) a report from the City Administrator on administrative activities of the preceding month; (3) a compiled list of all claimants who have filed verified accounts claiming payment of goods or services rendered the City during the preceding month, such list to be called the "Claim Report and bearing headings "Claimant", "Purpose", and "Amount"; and, (4) a copy of all minutes to be considered. The City Clerk shall forthwith cause to be delivered or mailed to the Mayor and each Council member copies of all said documents. Roberts^ Rules of Order (Newly Revised) shall govern all Council meetings as to procedural matters not set forth in the City Code. The order of business at regular meetings shall be as follows: 1. Call to Order. 2. Roll Call. 3. Determination of Quorum. 4. Consent Agenda. Routine items approved on one motion in the absence of a request for discussion. 5. Approval of Minutes. (Actual reading shall be waived in the absence of demand for reading.) 6. Reports from Boards and Conu.^isslons. 7. Meeting Opened to the Public. The presiding officer shall limit the time allowed. Persons speaking shall give their name, address, and state their business. This shall be limited to items not already on the agenda. 8. Report by Zoning Administrator. 9. Report by City Engineer. 10. Reports of Mayor and Council Members. 11. Report by City Administrator. 12. Report by City Attorney. 13. Licenses and Permits. 14. Payment of Claims and Approval for Payment of Claims and Appropriations. 15. Adjournment. Matters inappropriate for consideration at a meetingr or not in the order specified, shall not be considered except (1) with the unanimous consent of the members of the Council, or (2) scheduled public hearings or bid lettings at the time stated in the notice. All requests for placement on the agenda, including payments, must be filed seven days preceding the regular Council meeting at which it is to be considered. Passed by the Council this 10th day of April, 1989. ATTEST: James R. Grabek, Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk 4789.2HD To: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Proa: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director Date: April 7r 1989 • • , V • Subject: Temporary Employment - Orono Golf Course Each year it is necessary to employ temporary counter help and groundskeeper help at the Orono Golf Course. The following persons have been employed at the golf course for the past several years and are interested in working for us this season. Name Betty Stevens Walter Mills Doug Erickson Type of Help counter helper counter helper greenskeeper helper Dave Lindstrom counter helper Don Oas greenskeeper helper Per Hour $5.25 4.75 5.50 4.50 5.00 Effective After April 15r 1989 April 15, 1989 April 15, 1989 April 15, 1989 April 10, 1989 RECOMMENDATION - To employ the above persons as temporary counter helpers and greenskeeper helpers at the respective hourly rates, whose employment is not expected to continue for a period longer than six consecutive months. PROPOSED MOTION Moved by seconded by to employ the above persons as temporary counter helpers and greenskeeper helpers at the respective hourly rates, whose employment is not expected to continue for a period longer than six months. Ayes ___, nays ___. To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrate Forwarded recommending approval. •O o To: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Froa: John R* Gerhardson, Public Works Director Date: April 1, 1989 Subject: Public Hearing - Community Development Block Grant Program Year XV As a requirement for receiving Block Grant Funds it is necessary to conduct a public hearing to receive citizen input. The amount of funds allotted to the City of Orono for 1989 is $23,976. The proposed projects are as follows: Highwar 12 Corridor Study $ 14,476 RehabiXi^tation of Private Property 8,500 Westonka Intervention 1,000 $ 23,976 I have drafted a resolution for Council review and approval if there are no changes to the above projects as a result of the public hearing. RBCOMMBHDATION - To approve Resolution #________ approving the above projects and their respective amounts and to direct staff to submit an application to Hennepin County authorizing the above projects. seconded byPROPOSED NOTIOH - Move by _ _ #_ _ _approving the above projects and their respective amounts and to , to approve Resolution direct staff to submit an application to Hennepin above projects. Ayes _ _, nays ::ounty authorizing the To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Pros: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrate^ Forwarded recommending approval. The Council can, during the year of the grant, redesignate amounts as it chooses. This is particularly appropriate should the funding not be required for a corridor study. o A RBSOLOnOH APPROVING PROPOSED PROGRAM FOR YEAR XV URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS ft AUTHORIZING ITS SUBMITTAL WHEREAS, the City of Orono, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County, is a cooperating unit in the Urban County Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono has developed a proposal for the use of Urban Hennepin County C.D.B.G. Funds made available to it, following a public hearing on April 10, 1989, to obtain the views of citizens on local and urban Hennepin County housing and community development needs and the City's following proposed use of Year XV Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Funds. Highway 12 Corridor Study $ 14,476 Rehabilitation of Private Property 8,500 Westonka Intervention 1,000 $ 23,976 HOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono approves the proposed use of Year XV Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Fundtf and authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County for consideration by the Citizen Advisory Committee and for inclusion in the Year XV Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Statement of Objects and Project Use of Funds. April, ATTEST: Adopted by the City council of the City of Orono this 10th day of 1989. Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) J2unes R. Grabek, Mayor The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of April, 1989, by James R. Grabek ft Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor ft City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public My Commission Expires c^(a Tos Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Frans Mark E. Bernhardsonr City Administrate Dates April 6, 1989 Subjects Waterfowl Removal ATTACHMENTS - A - Burgess Letter Dated 4/6/89 4589.2HD ISSUE - Determination as to whether the City wants to initiate the process for possible removal of Canadian geese in the select neighborhoods by holding a public meeting on the matter. INTRODUCTION - As noted in Attachment A, the neighbors in the Pheasant Lawn area have become concerned about the goose population which over the last several years has gone from a single pair of geese up to a couple hundred this last fall. It is our understanding that a public meeting on the matterr "publically noticed" has to be held in advance of any removal done. The University desires to have a pretty good idea by the first of M^y of how many waterfowl removals they would be doing this summer, during a June/July time frame when the geese are not able to fly. DISCUSSION - The requirement for a public discussion held by the City is established by Federal Migratory Bird Agency and DNR prior to issuance of their permit. The issues at the meeting will be as follows: A) Whether the City would permit the removal of such waterfowl. B) What funding if any the City would undertake to assist in the removal. As noted on Attachment A, the usual goose concentration reduction program costs about $1,000 a year which removes approximately 95% of the geese at that time, with a 30% return rate in subsequent years. Normally it takes them only 4 years to effectively reduce the population to one that is no longer a concentration. In addition, they recommend every 2 years after that an additional removal program. At present there have only been 2 areas of notable concentration, this one on Pheasant Lawn together with the one on Shadywood Road (which the latter is more than just geese. It also includes substantial numbers of ducks). The neighbors on Pheasant Lawn have indicated their desire to fund it, but as noted in Attachment A, are soliciting assistance from the City on the matter. It should be noced that several suburban cities have participated in, if not totally funded, the program in their respective communities. Waterfowl Removal April 5, 1989 Page 2 of 2 ALTERNATIVES - 1. Schedule a public discussion for April 24, 1989. 2. Choose not to set the discussion. 3. Table until a later time realizing that it would probably mean no rr \1 this year. RECOMK.N - It is recommended that the City establish the public discussion to allow the opportunity this year for possible removal of the geese. PROPOSED MOTION Moved by _ _, seconded by __, that the Council estabj-ish April 24, 1989 as a date for the public hearing on the removal of waterfowl and that the appropriate notice published in the paper. Ayes - -, nays cc: Carol Burgess Dr. James Cooper i APR-6B8 Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator City of Orono P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay.MN 55323 Dear Mr. Bernhardson: in response to our recent telephone conversation regarding the Canada Goose problem in the Pheasant Lawn area, we would iike to request that the City of Orono begin a program to limit the Canada Goose population In our neighborhood The Canada Goose population Is Increasing in the entire Twin Cities area at a rate which is causing great concern. For those of use who live on Lake Minnetonka, the Goose population has become unmanagable. I have lived at 2B00 Pheasant Road since 1967. When I moved to my home, there were no geese in the area. The geese started settling in themid70‘s. Each year sees a larger and larger flock as they return, nest, and raise their young. Last summer, there were three to four new broods for each adult pair. The summer population is probably around 50 geese, and, during the fall migration, over 200 geese were on my lawn. This proliferation of geese causes marty problems. It is impossible to use lawns for recreation without hours of cleart-up. My beach area was completely unusable. Many families in the area have very young children, and the growing goose population poses a particular health and safety factor for them. I have tried to discourage the geese by stringing lines and flags all around my shoreline, Ijut this has not proven to be effective. I was advised by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to harass the geese with noise, chasing, etc. Again, there have been no long-term effects. Last year, I spoke to Rick Denneson, the Orono Community Service Officer. and had him come to my home to personally see the effects of the growing goose flock. Mr. Denneson, after walking through my yard, agreed that the geese had made my lawn Impossible to use. Goose droppings were so heavy that he had trouble finding a spot to step. Mr. Denneson then contacted state and local agencies regarding the problem and how we could deal with it. No information or action was Initiated last year. However, this past winter, Kevin Walsh, Orono’s present Community Service Officer, informed me that he was still working on problem. Recently. Mr. Walsh forwarded a letter to me from James Cooper of the University of Minnesota outlining a Canada Goose control program. A copy of Professor Cooper's letter is enclosed. The residents of the Pheasant Lawn area are In favor of using this plan to limit the goose popu lation in our neighborhood. We realize that there is a financial commitment. We would hope that the City of Orono will work with us to Implement this program and will participate with funding assistance. Many communities in the Twin Cities metro area are already doing so. Professor Cooper has provided Pheasant Lawn with a spot on his schedule for this year. If all preliminary steps (see accompanying tetter) can be concluded by May 1. 1969. we can have the first stage of removal this summer. Thank you for your help. Please feel free to cal) on me If I can be of any assistance. .^Y0ur5 truly, ^ Carol Burgess 2600 Pheasant Road Excelsior, MN 55331 612-471-9357 KEVIN WALSH Commanity Service OfTIcer Office: 473-7710 Nightii: 544-9511 Emergency: 911 445 Willow Drive Long Leke. Minnesota 55356 On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka TY O MINNESOTA- Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, College of Natural Resources St. Paul Minnesota 624-1223 55108 3/15/89 Mr. Rick Denneson P.O. Box 86 Orono, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Denneson: Sometime ago you requested information on Canada Goose population control. Sorry for the tardy response. We are prepared to help with the implementation of a Canada goose control program. The steps needed to get a program underway in 1989 and the agencies involved are: 1. Determine proposed target goose population reduction levels via discussions with city residents, feedback from press coverage, etc. (City) 2. Hold a public hearing to explain program and obtain additional input on acceptable population levels and reduction procedures (City, University, Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture). 3. Ascertain goose population size and distribution (University). 4. Obtain state and federal permits (University). 5. Capture and ship birds (University with cooperation of DNR and U. S. Department of Agriculture). 6. Monitor populations to determine additional removal level (University). 7. Conduct additional removal as needed under contract. The services provided by me include design of the removal program, public hearing participation, answering technical questions on goose ecology and management, humane and professional removal of problem geese, coordination of permits and bird disposal via the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, and evaluation of the effectiveness of the program. Based on our experiences elsewhere, the cost will beSlOOO per goose concentration site per year. It is my understanding that you wish to control the summer population at Long Lake, thus the cost would be $1,000 per year. These funds cover salaries for a crew of 6 University students, transportation, and equipment maintenance costs, etc. Capture and removal is done during the flightless period, extending from the second week of June to the first week of July. Because we have only three weeks to do removal, crews and equipment needs must be plan in advance, therefore, steps 1 and 2 should be completed by 1 May, 1989. Based on previous research, I recommend a 4-year adult and young removal program to reduced the flock, followed by removals at two-year intervals to maintain low numbers. An alternative control method would be hunting by licensed hunters during the special early Canada goose hunting season or during the regular stason. I recommend you contact Jon Parker, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (445-9393) for details. Sincerely yours. James A. Cooper Associate Professor cc. Roger Johnson, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Jon Parker, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Richard Wetzel, U. S. Department of Agriculture o TO:Mark E. Bernhardson,City Administrator FROM:Jack Brinkhaus,Street Foreman DATE:April 3, 1989 SUBJ:Spring Clean-up Days - May 6 & May 13, The City of Orono Public Works Department is planning spring clean-up days on Saturday, May 6, 1989 and May 13, 1989 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The collection point will be behind the long, gold equipment shed at Brown Road South and Spates Avenue in Crystal Bay, next to the Administration Building. The following items will HOT be accepted: tires garbage trees brush chemicals truck loads barrels, drums, chemical containers, petrolium products or containers Leaves and small items will have to be bagged and I^ewspapers and all paper products must be tied securely. This year appliances will be set aside and will be picked up by an agency that disassembles and recycles applicances. There is a fee to have them picked up, but we are not recommending charging a fee to the residents at this time. OROHO RBSIDBNTS OHLYI PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by seconded by to designate May 6 & May 13, 1989 as Orono Spring Clean-up Days. Ayes _ _, nays TO; Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Forwarded recommending approval. DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: April 6, 1989 Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Mel Kilbo. Chief of Police Employment - Mary Hensel Clark Part-time Temporary G When Mary Hensel Clark left our employ, she had been a very successful Officer Friendly, relating very well with the children. When she asked it she could come back at a later time to assist our Officer Friendly program. Officer Jim Cornick. our present Officer Friendly, was very receptive to the idea as he felt he needed more experience and training in the Program, as he did not have very much time training with her before she left the employment of the City. The reaction of the children to a woman police officer has been great. I budgeted $500 in salaries-temporary employees, and would pay Mary Hensel Clark at the rate of $6.50 per hour with no benefits, not to exceed $500. The Department runs three - 40 hour sessions of Officer Friendly yearly, however, Mary Hensel Clark will not be at all sessions. She would be in full uniform without a firearm. I would ask permission to hire her effective April 11, 1989. TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Forwarded recommending approval. While having her as a temporary part time police officer she would be used strictly in an educational role. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by , the Orono Council authorize the employment of Mary Hensel ClariTas a temporary part time police officer at a rate of $6.50/hour not to exceed a total of $500.00 effective April 11, 1989 and terminating no later than 6/23/89. Ayes __, Nays__. To: From: Date: Subject; Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members j Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato^||J(/^ ^ 4589.4HD -'I, April 5, 1989 Administrator's Information / (} r* HIGHWAY 12 TASK FORCE - vri/ Commissioner Levine's office has finally been back in contact and a meeting with Commission Levine and members of the Task Force is tentatively Set for Thursday# April 27, 1989 at the Orono C'Chools at 12:30 p.m. Further information will be available prior to your April 24th meeting. PROJECT DARE/OFFICER FRIENDLY - The City has been working over the last several months to initiate the DARE program in the Orono schools. At this time, because of teachers workload and scheduling conflicts, it may be difficult to initiate this program yet this spring, although the Police Department is continuing to work with the Principal on the: matter. The Chief of Police may be discussing the matter with the Superintendent. The City will continue its Officer Friendly program as noted in the request above. FACILITY SITE ANALYSIS/SOIL BORINGS > The soil borings done on the site at Highway 12 and Old Crystal Bay Road have indicated that the soils of concern on the whole site vary from up to 6" to 3' and as a result of that, it is not anticipated that soils will constitute a building problem on that site. As for the sewer plant site* test results arc not available as of this date. COUNTY ROAD 15 RIBBON CUTTING - The official opening of tl“ revised County Road 15 is anticipated for Saturday* May 6, 1989. Additional information will be provi'^ed regarding this at your April 24th meeting. BOARD OF REVIEW - Just a reminder that the Board of Review will be held on Thursday, May 11* 1989. SPRING MANAGERS' CONFERENCE - I am anticipating attending the Managers' conference from May 10th through the 12th. I will be absent from the Board of Review unless the Council would desire me to stay. The topic of the conference this year will be given by a group of individuals that have been associated with the Menninger foundation and w'i 11 be discussing issues regarding personal and professional change challenge for the 1990s. Administrator's Information April 5, 1989 Page 2 of 2 NAVARRE RE-DEVELOPMEWT - r:-, I ’ L I? CITY OF OROHO SDMMABY OF RECEIPTS, DISBORSEMBNTS KUTD BAU^NCES FOR THE MOMTH OF JANrARY i<)89 BKinaniG 1/1/S9 CAM IWnTMSRT BALAMCB BAUWCS 1/1/69 EMDING 1/31 S'"!! RECEIPTS TOTAL BODGBT (C) 1989 TRARSF TN IKVEST SOLO Oaaanil 2,961,358 60,493 (b)2,620,660 Parka 116,.*02 573 17,000 CS6A 0 0 - Iqalp Outlay 263,161 873 68,200 AUf Cap Oatly 145,228 492 129,500 Ma 8t Aid Coaa 3,519 0 - Par Zapr Ear 149,081 28,156 - Zav load 6«-76 609,720 3,691 82,800 zap ioBd 80 475,565 1,866 96,600 Zap Aead 82 195,025 1,175 15,650 Up Bond 85 136,861 894 91,150 Aatar op 113,523 599 191,500 •awar Op 443,170 48,073 463,220 Calf Coaraa Op Poolad loa Tmat Fuad 5,514,024 0 (5,514,024) 142 20,508 92,190 TcrAL CASH BODUET (C>1 OF TRANSF INVEST BALANCE DISBOR 1989 BCmCET OOT PORCH 1 ''31/89 —--------- --- --—————------ 260,8022, /20,6o0 9.6%2,761,049 0 -116,975 0 -0 0 112,530 3.0%264,034 30 -145,690 0 -3,519 2,531 -174,706 1R3.430 173,190 94.4%449,981 3 521,740 ■1%477,428 0 68,360 'J.0%196,200 652 108,390 0.6%137,103 7.894 174,540 4.5%106,228 32,655 361,24.’9.0%458.5B8 4,394 101, (i50 (a)4.3%(4,252) I^r\'EST BALANCE 1,251,834 20,508 TOTAU 5,514,024 98,589 167,535 3,868,470 0 1,251,834 492,899 3,942,500 949,721 (5,211,911) 5,211,911 949,721 75,338 5,211,911 TOTAU UT YR 5,361,402 56,648 216,922 3,628,170 0 1,022,597 -;40,280 3,624,030 723,000 134,887 5,061,305 TOTAL 1989 CASH 4 IHVBSTHEVT TO 1/31/89 $5,287,249 S'?' cfek eanoML fond soMounr - i989i % OF 50TE (a) Golf oparatlnq fund bud9«t do«a not Include aBounta for purchaaaa for roaala or salea tax c-ollectad/'ramlttaJ. The recalpta REVENDB BODGBT BODGET budget prcjecta groaa profit - not total recelpta. Taaaa 0 1,378,330 0.0%NOTE lb) General fund revenuea recorded will not equal receipts tioaBaaa 6 Paxalta 11,884 90,000 13.2%colleeted due to recelvablea billed in other accounting p>erloda and Zatar^av. Eaaaaaa 0 254,240 0.0%non-revenue receipts. Chf8 for Serr 139,009 623.990 22.3% Piaaa 123 95,500 0.1%NOTE (c) Budget UK>unta Include scheduled transfers, do not Include ZBt. aa ZBvaat.20,456 165,000 12.4%fund balance uses or additions. Traa. Pr Othax Ptiada 0 0 Othar 5,759 13,600 42.3% TOTAL K8VW8 177,2312., *70,660 6.8% (b) CITT OF 0*0110 SOMIMIT OF SECFIFTS, DI SBOUSBflSWTS AMD BALAIKrSS FO* m MOMTB OF FEMOAFl 1989 ■IM 2/1/M 2/1/W RBCXZFT8 TOTAl. woDcnrr (o 19M ntANSF IM iwvesT soi^ TCTAi BUDcrr I Cl 1909 » OF BODGHT TFANSF OCTT IHVFST PDMCH •8M881 2,761,049 129,276 (b)2,620,660 205,024 2,’20,660 1C.5* Wutkm U8.97S 2,163 17,000 0 - CMB 0 0 -0 ■ ■iBl» Mktef 384,034 4,887 68,200 6.OIF 112,530 5.34 M«f CM CMly 149.890 2.697 129,500 0 ~ ■HM 88 AM C hm 3,519 0 -0 ~ 8«r 2M> iM 174,708 4.402 -1.006 - tm AaM M-n 449,981 9,901 82,800 I'F 173,190 0.1* IM ••477,428 8,904 96,600 99,6,2 121,740 01.8* XM MBA 82 198,200 3,627 15,650 59,938 68.360 87.7* mSJT* **127,103 6,573 91,150 J 108,390 0.0* 108,228 2,349 191,500 14,967 174,540 8.6* A8B88 08 498,588 ■4,017 463,320 0,0 44 361,340 3.4* •8U 08M 08 88818i ttV (4,252)(40 93,190 (a)5,469 101,850 (a)5.4* vnat V8M 9,2U.911 (5,211,911)100,983 690,029 100,903 ENOIMC 2/29/99 CAS* BA LANCS 2/29/89 2,905 119 262 148 3 17b 459 386 139 143 93, 5 (9, , iCl ,138 0 ,904 ,307 .519 ,102 ,745 ,710 ,889 ,676 ,510 ,761 ,761) IMVSST BALANCE tOIBU s,m,»ii 75,3M 359,639 3,868,470 690,029 582,007 3,942,500 500,206 (5,022.168) 5,022,168 500,206 42,713 5,022,168 tOBttS U* n SrOU,MS 134,M7 199,983 3,628,170 0 1,049,791 505,214 3,624,030 799,073 80.373 4,811,087 TOTAL 1989 CASH t IMVHSTMEMT TO 2/29/89 55.064,881 88MI8JIT - 19891 • or MOTH (a) (iolf o|j«ratin9 fund budsat doaa not include anounta for porchaaaa for rvaala or **laa taa collaetad/rcmittad. Tha raceipta •ram B0DG8T BODOSr budget projecta groaa profit - not total receipta. ——0 1,378.330 o.ot NOTE (b) General fund reTennea racorded will not equal raceipta ti*8BBB8 ■ Fvcmita 32,430 90.000 24.9*collected due to recelveblea billed In other accounting periods and 31,848 254.240 12.4t aaB**ra*enue raceipta. CM* C*8 8wt 145.814 822.990 23.4% Mat*8.722 95.500 9.1%HOTB (c) Budget aeenata include acneduled trenafera, do not include 1B8. 8B IMM8. mm. vr OU mc rmim 38.S9S 0 185.000 0 34.0%fund balance uaee or addltiona. 08AW 7.780 13.800 57.3% 258.049 2.830.880 (b) 9.8% rF I s'! I -7' f' In f-1’ ■|r I, «■ I r |.e CITY or o«cwo SOMNIUIT (V KBCEIPTS, OISKTItSSMEirrS AJfC BALAltOtS rai not TMO NOHTaS mOBO rBUOART 29. 1989 1/1/99 1/1/99 KBC22PTI Tona •0D6BT (C) 1989 TRAMSr 18 XIIV8ST SOLO CIS8OT TCJTia Btrocrr (O 1989 » or BODGST ■niAwsr 009 TWVBST rOBCB TODIWG 2/29/89 CASB »A1JU*C* INVBFT 2/29/89 BALANCE a«aip Otl«y ■MtespOMir MB n AM CMS Anp AmA M-TC far imA m am AMA A3 AM B mA as 2.M1.39A US,402 0 MS.lOl 14S.220 3,S19 140.001 •09.720 479,MS 199.029 IM.Ml U3.S23 442.170 0 189,749 2,734 0 5,740 3,109 0 32,«S8 13.992 10,770 4,803 7,447 2,848 132.090 102AoU 08MM 08 IMtoA tw fVMO fMA 9.914.034 ( 9.S14.024) 121,491 r20,440 17,000 48,200 129.500 82,800 94,600 15,650 91,150 191.500 443,220 92.190 545,826 0 0 6,017 30 0 3,537 163,56-» 99,625 59,938 652 22.841 41,499 9,843 1,941,843 121,491 ,720,660 20.1* 112,530 5.3* 173.190 94.4* 121,740 81.8% 68,360 87.7% 108,390 0.6% 174,540 13.1% .361,240 11.5% 101,850(a) 9.7% 2.605 119 262 148 3 178 459 386 139 143 93 533 (9, , 301 ,138 0 ,904 , 197 ,519 ,102 ,745 ,710 .889 ,676 510 761 761 1 9.914.024 90.909 527.174 3,868,470 1.941,863 1,074,906 3,942,500 1 450,007 (5,022,168) 5,022.168 1,450,007 42.713 5,022,168 9000. LT 9.941.402 54,444 418.904 3.428,170 2.072,388 945,494 3,624.030 1,522,073 80,373 4,811,087 80MU8V • 1909i ■08089 « OP BODGIT ^__0 1,378,330 0.0* Ummm 4 Paxsita 34.304 90,000 38.1* 31,448 254.240 12.4* Chf8 for X *r 284.923 423,990 45.7* Mmo 8.849 95,500 9.3* IM. M lB«Mt.40.011 145.000 34.4* 9no. pr OBlMT pmA8 0 0 08Am 19.549 13.400 99.6* tOIAt AAfOA 439.280 2.420.440 16.5* (b) TOTAL 1989 CASB t INVESTMTUT TO 2/29/89 note (■) Golf op«ratln9 fund budget Co«s not includ* Mounts for purchssss for rnsal* or aslss tnjt coll«ctsd/r«*lttsd. Th« rscslpts budgst projects ■TOSS profit - not total racaipta. NOTE (b) Ganaral fund ravanuaa racordtd alll not aqual racaipta collactad dua to racalaablaa blllad In othar acrountln? parioda and noo~ravanna racaipta. ■on (c) "ud^at anounta includa achadtlea tranafars, do not includa fund balanca oaaa or addltiona. $5,064,381 r 4589.1cm or osoNO IHVBSTMBHT THAHSACTIOMS - BLECTROHIC IflRE TRAHSrSRS 03/29/89 Hat »dd*l due for purchase of CoHi*l Paper after sale of Cobb* Paper 03/31/89 Interest due on Certificate of Deposit 1st BanK Lakes Dain Bosworth Marquette 1st Bank Lakes JAH.- FSB. - MAR. DATE TRANSFER FOR FROM TO AMOONT 01/03/89 Interest due on Cert, of Deposit Dain Bosworth 1st Bank Lakes $ 2,137.50 01/12/89 Interest due on FNMA Bear Stearns 1st Bank Lakes 8,375.00 01/11/89 Cert of Deposit matured/ princ. & int. Bear Stearns 1st Bank Lakes 103,750.00 01/11/89 Net proceeds from sale of Cou'l Paper after purchase of FNMA repurchase agreement Marquette 1st Bank Lakes 152,000.00 01/25/89 Net proceeds from sale of Conua'l Paper and FNMA repurchase agreement after purchase of Coan'l Paper Marquette 1st Bank Lakes 55,483.79 02/15/89 Interest due on FNMA Bear Stearns 1st Bank Lakes 8,700.00 02/15/89 Strip Coupon froB Treas Bond matured Dain Bosworth 1st Bank Lakes 420,000-00 02/15/89 Met add'l due for purchase of Cobb'1 Paper after sale of COBS'1 Paper 1st Bank Lakes Marquette (150,164.31) 02/28/89 Net proceeds from sale of Cobb*1 Paper after purchase of Cobb'1 Paper Marquette 1st Bank Lakes 878.29 03/01/89 Interest due on FHLB Bear Stearns 1st Bank Lakes 11,311.75 03/01/89 Interest due on Cert of Deposit Dain Bosworth 1st Bank Lakes 3,900.00 03/01/89 Net proceeds from sale of cobb'1 Paper after purchase of Cobb'1 Paper Marquette 1st Bank Lakes 53,051.40 03/15/89 Net proceeds froB sale of Cobb'I Paper after purchase of Coaa'l Paper Marquette 1st Bank Lakes 64,977.01 (48,586.83) 2,352.50 IS 32 TO:Department Heads FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrate DATS:March 27, 1989 SQBJBCT: City Grievance Policy Attachment:A. City Personnel Rules Section 208 B. City Ordinance Section 2.07 As noted in Attachments A and B the City Personnel Rules together with the City Ordinance provide a means by which employees can appropriately bring their concerns regarding their employment to the attention of their supervisors and attempt to resolve the issues at the most appropriate level. As noted, it is the City's policy to discuss grievances when the appropriate procedure is followed. The Personnel Rules provide for an appeal through the Administrator when resolution is not satisfactory at the interim steps. As a general policy there is process in the Personnel Ordinance for app^^als of any Administrative decision to the Council. This i'j outlined in Attachment B. It is requ#5Sted that you again review these items for yourself and with your departmental supervisors together with providing appropriate communication of this policy to all the members within your department. Although everyone should have their own copy of the Personnel Rules this refresher may be of assistance to those who have not specifically looked at this section recently. Your cooperation is sincerely appreciated. 206. BREAKS A Authorized breaks shall begin and end ar cne employee's assigned work area. Authorized breaks shall include a break during the first four hours of work, a meal break and the second four hours of work and shall not exceed one hour in total for all breaks in a day. Department Heads are responsible for scheduling such breaks for department personnel and may adopt department rules specifically addressing such breaks. 207. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION 1, There shall be a minimurr of one (1) written performance review on an annual basis for i 1 regular full-time, regular part- time and for probationary employees as outlined in Section 203. The evaluation will include a review of the employee's major responsibilities, an appraisal of the employee's job performance, identification of any areas needing improvement and an action plan for correction or improvement, including the establishment of future performance objectives. 2. A personal interview between the immediate supervisor and the employee shall be conducted by the supervisor within a reasonable period of time after receipt by the employee of the supervisor s written evaluation, A copy of the written evaluation for each regular and probationary employee shall be submitted to the City Administrator for review and shall be filed in each employee s personnel file. An employee must receive an overall evaluation of "satisfactory" performance to be eligible for a salary performance increase. 208. GRIEVANCE POLICY 1, It shall be the policy of the City that full and free opportunity for discussion of grievances is encouraged. No punitive action will be taken against an employee who submits a grievance in good faith and follows proper procedure. 2. The City will handle grievances promptly. The grievance procedure will consist of three steps. An emp1oyee shall be deemed to have waived his/her tights under this section if the employee fails to follow the procedures as outlined herein: a. Step One. When a grievance regarding benefits or working circumstances is brought to the attention of the employee's supervisor, that supervisor shall discuss the relevant circumstances with the employee, consider and examine the causes of the grievance, and attempt to resolve it. If the grievance cannot be settled at this level, the grievance shall be reduced to writing by the employee, signed and submitted to the employee's Depart ment Head within twenty (20) days of the initial discussion with the supervisor. Step Two. The Departnient Head will discuss the grievance with the employee and give a written decision within ten (10) days of receipt of the written statement. If tne employee is not satisfied with the Department Head's decision, the employee may request a meeting with the City Administrator. The grievance to the Administrator shall be submitted in writing by the e-rployee and signed within ten (10) days following the response or passage of the Department Heads's response deadline. Step Three. The City Administrator shall explore the nature of the grievance and discuss all relevant circumstances with the employee. The City Administrator shall give a decision in writing within fifteen (15) days of receipt of the written statement of grievance as to whether or not any action will be taken in response to the employee's grievance. ¥■ P. 209. DISCIPLINARY ACTION 1. The method of and procedures for disciplinary action shall be determined by the City Administrator, subject to approval by the City Council if the action involves suspension or termination. 2. Employees may be disciplined in the form of: a. Oral reprimand b. Written reprimand c. Suspensions with or without pay d. Demotion e. Transfer f. Discharge 3. In all cases of suspension, transfer, demotion, or dismissal, the reasons for such action must be presented in a dated, written statement to the employee affected as soon as practicable after the action has taken place. 4. An employes may request a meeting with the City Administrator to discuss any disciplinary action taken against the employee. The employee must submit the request in writing and s^ate the grounds for the request. The City Administlator shall meet with the employee within ten (10) days of receipt of the written request. 5. Cause for disciplinary action including reprimand, suspension, demotion or dismissal shall include buc not be limite to any of the following: 3. Develop an'J issue all administra rules, regulations and procedures necessary to ins functioning of all departments and office Administrator’s jurisdiction as permitted by law and Council approval . C. Prepare and submit an annual budget to the Council and keep the Council advised of the financial conditif^- of the City and make such recommendations as may from time to time be determined desirable and necessary. D. Attend ard participate in discussions at all meetings of the Council anc other official bodies as directed by the Council. The City Ad inistrator shall also represent the City at all official o’ semi-official functions as may be directed by the Council a i not in conflict with the prerogatives of the Mayor. E. See th code ace duly enforced. t all laws and provisions of the City ^ F. Make cr let purchases and contracts when the I amount thereof does not exceed $5,000.00 anda,.,uu..u ............- ....................... --- to receive • estimates, quotations, sealed bids, purchases or contracts in ^ ( i excess of $5,000.00 and present them to the Council for officia^l •, action. G. Recommend from time to time the adoption of such measures as tne Administrator may deem necessary or expedient for the health, safety and welfare of the community or for the improvement of the administration. H. Perform such other duties as may be required by the Council and consl'^tent with Minnesota Statues and the City Code. Subd. 5. Bond Required. The City Administrator shall furnish a surety bond to be approved by the Council, said bond to be conditioned on the faithful performance of those duties. The premium of the bond shall be paid by the City. Scbd. 6. Deputy City Clerk. The City Administrator shall, by virture of that position, be a Deputy City Clerk. Subd. 7. General Supervisory Capacity. No member of the Council shall in any manner interfere with, or prevent the City Administrator from exercising the Administrator’s own judgement in the administration ol the City. Except for the purpose of Inquiry, no member of the Council shall deal exercise control over the administration of the City, and no member shall give oraers to any Department Head or employee of the City, either publicly or privately except througn a majority vote of the Council. SBC- 2.07. a^GHT TO ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL. If 3ny p»rson shall be aggrieved by any adni n i s t: r a 11 ve decision of the City Administrator or any otner City official, or any Board or Commission not having within its structure an established review schedule or an appellate procedure, such aggrieved person is entitled to a full hearing before the Council upon serving a written request therefore upon the Mayor and City Clerk at least seven (7) days prior to any regular Council meeting. Such request shall contain a general statement setting forth the administrative decision to be challenged by the appellant. At such hearing the appellant may present any evidence the appellant deems pertinent to the appeal, but the City shall not be required to keep a verbatim record o: the proceedings. The Mayor, or other officer presiding at the hearing, may, in the interest of justice or to comply with tine requirements and on the Mayor's own motion or the motion of the appellant, the City Clerk, or a‘ member of the Council, adjourn the bearing to a more convenient time or place, but such time or place shall be fixed and determined before adjournment so as to avoid the necessity for formal notice of reconvening. An employee of the City who is aggrieved by an action or decision of another City employee thft relates to their employment shall exhaust the grievance procedures set forth in the Administrative and Personnel Policy before requesting a hearing before the City council. SEC. T.08. ROLES OF PROCEDURE FOR APPEALS AND OTHER HEARINGS. The Council may ad:>pt by resolution certain written rules of procedure to be foil.wed in all administrative appeals and c ler hearings to be held “before the Council cr other bodies authorized to hold hearings and determine questions therein presented. Such rules of procedure shall be effective thirty (30) days after adoption ani shall be for the purpose of establishing and maintain:ng order and decorum in the proceedings . SEC. 2-09. FACSIMILE SIGNATURES. The Mayor, City Clerk or Deputy City Clerk, and Treasurer or Deputy City Treasurer are hereby authorized to request a depository of city funds to honor an order for payment when such instrument bears a facsimile of that person's signature, and to charge the same to the account designated thereon or upon which it is drawn, as effectively as though it were the person's manually written signature. Such authority is granted only for the purpose of permitting such officers an economy of tima and effort. SEC. 2.10 INTERIM EMERGENCY SUCCESSION- Subd. 1. Purpose. Due to the existing possibility of a nuclear attack or a natural disaster requiring a declaration of a state of emergency, it is found urgent and necessary to insure the continuity of duly elected and lawful leadership of the City to provide for the continuity of the government and the emergency interim succession of key governmental officials by providing a method for temporary emeigency appointments to their offices. Subd. 2. Succession to Local Offices. In the event of r >N ooAL SBrmc CUT OP OROND HMg E. eBnOMDSOH dTT AGHIMISTRKroR 1 »Mr was - 30 APRl!. 1989 draft 4/?0/88 5/01/88 5/11/38 6/30/83 7/29/88 8/30/88 9/15/88 Revised for V30/88 10/11/88 11/30/8? 12/28/38 1/31/89 2/28/89 3/11/89 '89 Goal Setting •87 Sro - 1987 Council Strategic Planning Short Term Objective *88 fflO - 1988 Short Tton Objective '89 STO - 1989 Short Iterm Objective oait. ARBU CBJhCJTWS IME5 sums 1. oMfnimr DEVOxvwtrr ■87 sro Highway 12 A. Oonprehensive Plan Anendment #2 (5/87) Receive beck frrxn Met Council 5/15/88 Extension to 5/15 granted to Metro Council folloi«u>ig 4/8/88 meetina re: Urbeui land demcxls 5/12/88 approved by Metro Council Metro Council Final plan approval 6/15/88 Zoning Amendment - Draft 6/L5/88 - Planning Coomission 7/1/38 consideration - Council consideration 8/10/85 Final Council arrtoval 5/23/88 Contracted witi Shardlow 5/23/88 Draft from Sharuiow to Council to PC - 6/27/88 7/6/80 work Pfrsslon on draft 8/1/38 to be work session scheduled 8/17/88 Pul ic Hearing - P.C. recomaendation to Ocxincil. Anticipate Council 13/10 10/10/88 re viewed by Ccxncil - Anticipate 11/28 tabled - Tb present again 1/9 1/9/89 Council reguested individual discussions (Held 1/16 - i/31) 2/27/09 Council again considers - to 4/10 mtg OBJKTIVB DKOS 1. OQMOiimr osvBxvMarr cant. Negotiations or utilities (Long Latce-Medina) ‘S8 910 ■89 STO B. Oorridor Selection Study Ad Hoc Task Force Conplete Phase 1 10/1/88 Proposed 1991 lit|3roveinent Navarre Nadevelopaent *88 STO '89 910 Qigage oonsultants - Planning - Legal Td be determined Initiate Goal/Objective Setting process 10/1/88 Gooplete Master Plan Study Determine Strategy to L^lenent 7/89 8/89 Consider HRA foraation Soli cite ideas/proposals 6/15/88 Connenoe if Decide to do 9/1/88 STMRE Received Itr from Medina re: more sewer/negotiations 6/24/88 Responded with letter 7/21/88 to Medina Ad Hoc Task Force - 1st meeting 5/19/88 5/19/88 meeting held 7/18/88 meeting held 8/10/88 meeting held - Reps to contact »«Jot 9/19, 88 meeting held - »IDot Diet. 5 present Re: maximum upgrade in current oorridor 10/17 Highway 12 meeting of Mayors - prep for meeting with Transportation Comaissioner 11/16/88 Meeting with »iDOT Conmussioner held Anticipate 1/89 meeting with Oownissinner/ Task Poroe in vicinity - Currently attempting to set date. 1/9/89 Unofficial Dist 5 ranks Higtway 12 as 42 new construction priority 2/9/89 M^OOT conversation indicated plan not final - will contact us «rtien ready 3/30/89 Response to additional inquiry. Will atteiqpt to get group meeting in April/early May possibly 4/27 Receipt of initial re^xnae to 1/9/89 Council 1/9/89 Council directs respo se - Staff to meet with MfiDOT. 1/24/89 Meeting with MnDOT/Long I^ke Public information mtg by MnDOT set 4/25/89 3/25/88 requested quotat-on from J. Shardlow regarding cost to do master plan development for area. 7/11/88 proposal adopted 10/88 Base/Background work being done 12/22/88 Planner/StafC held mtg - Anticipate Council presentation 4-5/89 2/88 Request Attorney out_ine process required to establish 3/1/88 received outlines for establishment of HRA. Staff reviewing for ooonent iiiliii I MA GQM. JUA 1. (XMONITSr oevaOtBfr cant. OBJKTIVBS XBBS STKTOB ’87 STD C3oirty 15 Development •88 STD ■89 9ID Determine desired local aooonipanying iflpcovemints Fineuicing plan Con?)lete constructicn Specia.1 assessment hearing 5/30/88 lssi« oC lighting to 2/22/88 Council meeting 2/22/88 Council considers lighting 5/23/88 Council approves lighting 5/30/88 Conceptual approval 12/14/87 Financial revision proposed 2/22/88 3/28/88 tabled to 5/23/88 5/23/88 approved financing 12/1/88 Tfe cownence 4/J' '■'H All cuf-b i c jving i lights cunpleted. ^ '89 balance of sidewal; restoration 7/89 Delay to pcojecc oonpletion ' 87 STD Oonnunity Transportaticn Plan *88 sro Refine capital improvement program prior to 89 Dudget Determine bridge replacement program 7/1/88 8/11/88 meeting reviewed revised draft 8/1/88 Proposal included in revised draft capital budget. Request for funding needs to be developed/submi tted. Anticipate bridge bonding request to 4/89 Council meeting '89 SPO Continued analysis Public/Private 9/89 Evaluate Cty 116 7/1/88 3/17/88 received request from Medina 4/25/80 Council elects not to support Resolution U/28/88 - Cty/>1edina revised 116 to st<^ at Cty 6 rather than 12. Cty willing to go baleinoe. 1/9/89 - 1/23/39 Council ooisiders options 1/23/89 Ccuncil to indicate opposition to County Boat'd. Tabled issue of City action if Oouity goes ahead to 2/27/89 meeting 2/27/89 discussed issue and again 1V> CouncU for further discussion 4/10/89. QOM. AWaV 1. ocMcnaTy Demjspfem cont. (BncnvEs DftlZS 9IMCQB *87 SID Storn Mater Management Plan *88 910 •89 SID Oaan Dev - Direction and progress •88 SID •89 SID Review advisory/Policy todies V88 roIe/Repsansibillties Review & revise as necessary U/88 staff/advisory/policy boay process Cor developnent review & execution worRing towards service & results oriented "No Surprises" process Enhance effective control on 12/88 marinas 4/11/88 presented to Council. Ito be reviewed by Planning Conini5:.ion Anticipate 7/U/88 discussion with Council/PC reps. Tabled bo 8/8/88 meeting Rescheduled for U/88 89 Annual schedule bo include 2 dates 2/6/89 (Mon. evening) and 7/29/89 (Sat. morning) Attenpting to set Joint Meeting 5/1/89. 1/9/89 Council directs Marina Coiniiittee establishment for 1989. 1/23/89 Council tables to 2/6/89 Joint intg. 2/6/89 Not discussed. BKmOMENIM. PRDIBCnON *87 9ID Stubbs Bay *88 SID •89 SID Conplete needs assessment 2/88 Project feasibility-conmenoe 5/88 Review Revised Feasibility 10/88 Determine assessment area interest Financing options Determine 8/88 10/88 12/88 Anticipate needs assessment oonpletion 2/88 2/22/88 Information presented Submitted request Cor feasibility update cost Feasibility study approved 6/13/88 Anticipate bo 11/28 meeting - Changed to 2/27/89. V20/89 Staff reviews significant issues with Attorney. 3/28/89 received Attorney review. 8/8/88 meeting - Council received Consider developnent moratorium 2/89 is; s’*",: OOM. Am CBJEOIVS DK1S3 SDOIB 2. EMVDGNBIIAL PROEBCTICN cant. 1^^ Solid Waste Managoant '89 910 If Arocopciate - Initiate project - Project bid - Conroence project - Assess project - Gonplete project 3/89 4/99 10/89 10/89 Assess recycling efforts to goal 6/88 Assess other avenues bo n»et goals 6/88 including local ccnposting Curbside Recycling 10/88 Review regulations regarding solid waste 3/99 City in oonjunction with West Hennepin met '87 goal Currently exploring costs of selected curbside pick up - 8/17/88 staff has tour with potential contractors Presented to Council 10/10 10/24/88 Council directs initiation 12/12/88 contractor selected - Anticipa'oe start prior to 2/89. 1/28/89 Containers distributed 2/1/89 Program oonmences Review organized oollection if needed 9/B9 U-T %■ V- f- ■ r it|:: OCAL AA (BJHLT1V15 OTOir 3. onsMfizAncNAL DBmjotmtr 1989 Council Goal Setting Ccmnence 7/88 8/11/88 meeting held - '89 revisions Ooraplete 9/38 App.-o ed 9/'12/88 1989 Budget Process Assessmeit Board of Review 4/88 4/27/88 initial meeting held. Anticipate conclusion on 5/9/88 5/19/88 Board concluded Capital budget Adoption 8/88 Budget Adoption 9/26/88 7/11/88 1989 Budget message/ Guidelines to Ccxincil Budget meeting set for 9/20/88 Budget adoption/mill rate to 10/10/83 lO/i.0/88 Mill rate adopted 10/24/88 Budget adopted 1989 Legislative Prcjgrara Ccxiplete 12/88 10/88 Received AW policies At 11/28 meeting tabled to 12/12 12/12/88 Adopted Team Building Staff U/88 Council - Consider Formats 2/89 Undertake if desired 3/89 4. SERVICE DaJVERY *87 910 Pteillties Study *88 910 Phase II CcxnpLetion 6/88 Lif>lenient any recunnetx]atic3ns 7/88 Ib Planning Conriission for review 5/18/88 Site criteria to Council 9/26/88 Criteria/3rd site adopted 10/10/88 Anticipated to 2/13/89 meeting Draft analysis received 2/27/89 with colic*# 3/8/89 infomal meeting 3/8/89 meeting held. Soil borings directed <*l sites B and C. 3/20/89 Planning Gcnnissicn reviews sites and cx»m»nts Anticipate questionaire to neighborhood 4/89. Anticipate preliminary costs S/89. I OnL ARA (AIBCTiVS OMS5 STATO5 4. SSRtrtCB IXZJVBOr cant. *87 SID Long Range Financial Policy '89 SID Draft policy to Council 7/98 Golf Course Animal Control Cooncil adoption Develofment of business strategy Evaluate program 3/88 7/87 8/88 2/22/88 Initial draft capital budget discussed 10/10/88 Initial investment guidelines presented. 'Tt 11/14 for fin.»l review. ;^pted investment guideline 12/12/88 1/31/89 City receives OFOA certificate for 1987 Financial Rrjport Extended service to Long Lake/Spring Park/Minnetonka Beach-1988 Renewed ail 3 for 1989 5. aOHAN RESOtnCS Gon^iensation Explore Performance Incentive as addendum to cximpensation plan 3/38 Formal plan to 2/88 Formal plan and arijustraents presented 2/22/88 3/25/88 plan adcjpted 4/12/88 comp worth report submitted to State Sutraitted 1989 plan to 12/12/88 1/9/89 Adopted '09 program 6. HABKErnC GoflPunity Info...nation/ Newsletter Mayor's Articles Evaluation of system Ongoing 8/38 Mayors's Article format to oontinue to 8/88 for next evaluation 8/22/8C Submitted review to Council 8/22/88 Council directs continuanoe of system :I COUNCIL MEETING 3 / APR10193Q CITY Or ORONO LIST OP LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR MEETING OP April 10, 1989 Commercial Kennel License: D. Brian & Cathy L. Fulmer 3505 Way-zata Blvd. Residential Kennel License • . . ?* •’ ■ . .r. Wayne E. & Gayle Carrier 1376 North Arm Drive Jean Carlson 2344 Olive Avenue Julia Kimball Whitney 4470 Forest Lake Landing George W. Ronald 2480 Old Beach Road ■■ =:>V- •t; 'V r .. keshel license application Effective January 1, 19ga_ to December 31, 19^ Owner t Tl. U. property Address; g*, (include city and zip) Mailing Address tif different) Phone; fhnma) ATXo-V^yZ-O ----------------(wor)c) BBSIOBMTIAL Kennel License information; $20.50 - 1989 Licensing Period (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be )cept at one time;- - - - (over 6 months of age) Principal Breeds - - - - - - - --— Purpose for more than 2 dogs:_ _ _ _.—- - - - - - - - - -— Dogs normally.Icept; V^inside ^^_)cennel structure CITY Cf ORO^a FINiriCE OFFICE V V wv 01 CEH 12S.C'. 125. C-K EECEIFJ-TFiilX YDU u 1~‘’0L }Q1 TIC- Kennel License Information; $125.00 - 1989 Licensirig“Period (payment must accompany application) Name of Business; Sa^C=:_ Business Activities; (ioACo.^(example; boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Normal Business vc...... - A After Hours Contact; fname 1 -p.P^tLAA/CftTWA )—» . (phone lAn-^ / AnCc• -------------- Dog runs/exercise areas are; _____inside ------^outside Naboth violate any provision of “V^City Ora;.;^ or oto premises «P ”*’ •?" sirrwirS.S5: ?he “ty Council as pirt of «y )cennel license appro.val. Applicant ________ For City Use Only y . A I Kennel inspected by n P^Ut r\ U fO v.<P/-— Recommends Acnroval )( _ Denial Date Date^5b£l KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective January 1, 19___ to December 31# 19_ ------- E. >(■ ^ Property Address: /3 7 ^ ^R/n ----—-------------- (include city and zip) Mailing Address (if different):_____ Phone: (home)_______^7/ - ^ W* » I w'»“ w.'wltu-fi^,vr£ jf'irs (work) ¥7/ - /fg-rf 01 5iV ii’. i ibi^uwvWV RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Information: $20.50 - 1989 Licensing P^^^ ‘Vi*^ (payment must accompany application) Cy£i\ si wC-.i ' 6/ RECEIPT-THAr^K YOUMaximum No. of dogs to be )cept at one time:_Z.- - *■- (over 6 months of age) Principal Breed; Sf^/2. -^<^^7 — Purpose for more than 2 dooa; i4- ci*-y ■ - // Dogs normally kept: ^ inside •lllv*--*puJRCTAL Ketmel Lic^mse Infc----- (payment must accompany application) Name of Business:_______ -______ _kennel structure >5.00 - 1989 Licensing Period Business Activities:__________________;-------------------——rr:r^(example; boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Normal Business Hours:, After Hours Contact: (name) (phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are: _____inside ------^outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that the City Council as part of any Icennel license approva . '-€::xuia, Appii^nt UULJ x/>/Af Date Date y/i/s2L Recommends ApprovalDenial. Owner: KBNNEIi IiXCEN Effective January 1, 19 FJ1^ APPLICATIOH M to December 31 ^ 19 Q ]' U ff^nnF 2 2 Bflg property A^^ree... /Ha/ (include city and zip) Mailing Address (if different): QUU^ Phone: (home) L/l/'l/H __________ (work) '______ RBSIDBHTIAL Kennel License Information: (payment must accompany application) $20.50 - 1989 Licensing Period Maximum No. of dogs to be )cept at one time:, (over 6 months of age) LoaPrincipal Breed: _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Purpose for more than 2 dogs: fc^ Dogs normally Icept: ^ fc*»nnf.i at^ruet^ure jrinsideIcennel structure COMMERCIAL Kennel License Information: $125.00 - 1989 I*icensing,P^lod (payment must accompany application)M rrw 7A cy V?^lt wV • w V CHECK :o.5-Name of Business:_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ RECEIPT-iHAKK YOU Business Activities: _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _r.A) tia^ (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.-)^* Normal Business Hours:._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ After Hours Contact: (name) (phoneT Dog runs/exercise areas are: .inside ____^outside ^ both The undersigned hereby maJces application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigend hereby grants the city permlsssion to Inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during tne license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the reyiirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions .imposed oy the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. . j . :. j..-. - •. . . . . . . . . . .•vC:. J (^ y> ^ J plicant Date For City Use Only ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ fennel inspected by _^ Date ^ x Recommends Approval Denial ^ KENNEL LICBNCT APPLICATION Effective January Ir 19 ^9 to December 31 r 19 c7 Owner s > v )<\ mhoJIt LO K I 4k^ Property A<^f^reaa; ^^*^0 1^0^ (include city andzipl ^ Mailing Address (if different):_ _ _ _ Phone: (home) SSS (work) RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Information: $20.50 - 1989 Licensing Period (payment must accompany application) ' 9l ’ *Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time; (over 6 months of age) Principal Breed; / flOcScL^rau^^ /^ ^ Purpose for more than 2 dogs:- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - Dogs normally kept: / inside V.__kennel structure UTY C7 'v.' Flr^A^CE C"*‘ lEllSOCCCO COMMERCIAL Kennel License Information: $125.00 - 1989 Licensing Period « ___ _ ____ \ —!(payment must accompany application) Name of Business:, iriLiS '-v. Business Activities: - - - -- - - - - - - - -- t-=--r—%(example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Normal Business Hours; _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _—- - - - - - - - -- After Hours Contact:(name)_ (phoneT Dog runs/exercise areas are: ,inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for ^ License as specified on this fonnj the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the ^nSi«!ge/d*^^«ebJ grants’the £ity permisssion to tirior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the lI«Mrduration, a^d the undersigned agrees to abide *>y ‘J* of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. fptlicant DateW- Recommends Approval^^^ Denial Owner: KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION , « G O Effective January If 19o 9 to December 31, IS Property a/:j> (include city and zip) Mailing Address (if different):. Phone: (home) C/A^(work) KSSIDBHTIAL Kennel License Information: $20.50 - 1989 Licensing Period (payment must accompany applicatijjn) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time:_j^£- - (over 6 months of age) Principal Breed: Purpose for more than 2 doaas - - - - -- Dogs normally.kept: _____^inside _2r ^kennel structure Kennel License Information: 5125.00 - 1989 Licensing (payment must accompany application) FinAniE Ofi'iCE 1311500000 ---------------------------------------------------------------- 01 QEfi 20,50 I 7 <aj. vv V vvv Name of Business _______________ Business Activities \ ai rry(example: boarding, breeding, veterinary . care, retail, iL UV-WV Normal Business Hours : ---------•^^CEIt'T-THANK YOU S134300 cool fiOl T12: After Hours Contacts frime) ------------------------------- 04/07/ fphone)____________________ Dog runs/exercise areas are: __inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City K^^ne? Lice"/se a. specified on this f undersigend hereby grants the City permlsssion Z U‘*. ^ ^ •* . J! - . . -•-i ^ ^ ’ * • . -:.v Applidut Date Recommends Approval_J/ Denial- - -- For City Use Only Kennel inspected by Date ,r t Lii. i i-ii M g ! I i 1 1 : IK. ■S:: ill. I‘2 ' »< tic lit ITT ZZ‘, lil. iz.- :zi 5v .Zi ■zc in; 3C iJ*- 'it-, 9- J7~ 3t :sc' .411 U3 44' bi >4C o; • 4» I : •6: t; •c:. 93 't • • • 04/08/89 PR: ^10 CB PRREGOR k2 . ./f CITY OF PAYROLL ^TO--CURRENT- NAME DPT CROSS CROSS -AhiDERSON, BRUCE-L -t043a.-lA.-UaS-^5-------t3T 77. BERNHAROSON, MARK E IE B06ZIEN, SUE A 31 TOSMAWAMIE-L---------------VB- BRINKHAUS, JOHN F CHESWICK, CARY B XHRXST-IANSON> SALLY. 4E 31 -3J- 15056.56 6197.10 -359B^ 10E00.51 10S0E.64 _4-L741-^Oa 305.SB i 106.6S 1301.83 1460.56 _t86^aUJL 169.01 1S1.96 2.1^66. CORNICK, JAMES L 31 ENCLXSHZXI, IRVXNC H 31 -ER XXKSON^—KURT—R- - -31 FXSCHENICH, DAN T FRXTZLER, JOHN M .SAFFRON, MICHAEI_P- 31 31 -33- 10203.73 9535.02 -9374^59- 9153.15 10050.97 91873.1. 1796.74 160.27 1450.63 156.66 6- -2S6-.-96 1302.44 161.29 1681.48 07.03 -1250^2_ _177...1S- CERHARDSON, JOHN R GREGORY, JAMES D MALL INt—DOROTHY—M- HANSEN, STEVEN C HANSXNC, CAROL J .JACOBS, THOMAS-^- 42 42 -4B 11765.53 8724.32 -7706^-4^1- 42 31 -3Z- 6149.72 3456.87 B8.8731 1664.23 1079.20 J40 3.r2O 480.77 449.90 Iggft ftO 31 31 JOHNSON, BRADLEY P KXLBO, MELVIN H KNUTSON,^ CHARLOTTE-A- 15— KUEHN, THOMAS M KUYPER, SCOTT E jaABUSTH ,-JEANNE-A - HORAN, HARK F 9695.49 1266:i.20 4164.^^46 1367.59 1812.80 -882,44- 204.64 220.76 -93.62- MOROWCZYNSKX, JAMES 44AABt—THERESA-L- - OBRIEN, RANDY L OMAN, LYLE E RATHBUN, BARRY J SASS, JOHN J SCHAUSSt—CWARLE5-R 31 SCHEFFLER, LAURIE K 12 SKREEN, DALE S 42 ..STEFJ^NHAGEN, RONALD .93 15 31 11849.41 970.20 1696.32 656.04 l49T-fi8_ 161.21 64.23 139-S3 31 10639.35 1330.60 165.20 31 11498.50 1664.19 153.52 _1E—-_61-19,89—.-882.40 708,62 92 6959.46 624.00 116.91 33 7321.32 1048.07 17.09 4P ft03® 41 1E08.,96 __136-60 92 7354.42 1054.01 110.25 42 7963.39 968.80 109.52 7654-,-03- - -^108V,^06- -108,77- 5219.07 7611.97 7718.84- 750.24 968.80 11 tu 69.58 134.30 THOMTON, MARK R 31 TOMCHECK, LAURENCE F 31 TOMCZYK^ -MARK-U- - - -St- UALSH, KEVIN L 35 8473.75 8947.97 1255.36 1417.59 143.25 217.52 1481.09 t^46- -128-.84— 301.88 27.44 ^,738 ..85. _ _£^.454.96 i vr' . 2 L» Li It .li !t •T t M t !Tu '■Z !2 :a .2 *2 ,'2 ■ 2 i2 .2 .2 a s -2 I4P to •51 •52' ■fa r c 04/30/89 PR: CH PRRECOR CITY OF PAYROLL R -Y-TD NAME DPT CROSS -CURRENT- CROSS XALLAHAN, EDUARD-J------Lt COETTEN, J.DZANN 11 CRABEK, JAMES 11 NETTLES, ALAN-4R-------------1 _96S-68--841 .67- PETERSON, BARBARA A 966.68 1S00.00 -946^8- 966.68 E41.67 300.00 -844^7- S41.67 X^64^8- ■•■taiaa 1989 CITY OP ORONO CHECK REGISTER 04-10-89 PACE 1 CHECK NO. 'I 100005 JJAIC._At10VNI._VEND0R_ 04/06/89 100006 100006 04/06/89 _Q4/06/99 100006 100006 04/06/99 04/06/99 195.38 IQS.38 » ALL STAR PRO 60LP CO J_TEM_ DE8CRIPTI ON RENTAL C BA68 _ACCOUNT_NO ,__INV^ _P. 0. • HESSACE_ 74-4560-590-93 81 .77 91 .77 91.79 81 .77 ACR0-HINNE80TA INC ACR0-H1NNE80TA INC ACRO-niNNESOTA INC ACR0-HINNE80TA INC OFFICE 8UPPLIES _0FPICE^8UPPLIES O^ICE WPPLIE8 OFFICE 8UPPLIE8 01-4810-039-18 _01 jl 481 0-059-14 01-4810-069-15 01-4810-189-31 jfir 3 'i* 100006 04/06/99 81 .78 490.65 4 ACR0-t1INNE80TA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4819-849-48 if \\tr 1 6 4««-CKS WB'. 1 100010 04/06/89 . . 17J7 AT6T INFO-SYSTEM TELEPHONE 74-4380-590-93 •'*r %» rt It 17.17 4 4**-CKS • t z: a.** 1 100030 100030 04/06/99 ___ 04/06/99 19.43 _ _ _ _ 19.43 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM _ _AT_6 T INFO 9Y9TEM DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING 01-4340-039-18 01-4340-089-14 17 •4 X 2' 'li 100030 100030 100030 04/06/99 04/06/99 04/06/99 19.43 38.80 19.43 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING 01-4340-069-18 01-4340-189-31 01-4340-174-33 100030 04/06/99 19.43 189.65 4 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROCESSING 01-4340-849-48 - *1 N 4 100031 100031 04/06/99 04/06/99 8.97 1 .45 4.48 4 AT 6 T COMM AT 6 T COMM TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 01-4380-039-18 01-4380-189-31 4*«-CK8 411 4X1 6X1 44' 100039 04/06/89 44.58 44.88 4 EARL F ANDERSON A9SC SIGNS 01-4833-849-48 4.'. 464 4 V \ 100040 04/06/99 Ml .70 141.70 4 APACHE PAPER CO C FOLD TOWELS 01-4831-099-17 SCr 1 1 •♦•-CKS t3i »4‘ 10004<2 04/06/99 40.00 A8PLUN0 COFFEE MEETING EXPENSE 01-4388-080-11 19.' 18' 100048 04/06/99 40.00 80.00 4 ASPLUNO COFFEE MEETING EXPENSE 01-4388-174-33 9* 96.' 9C •••-CK8 6M 6X1 100064 04/06/99 78.85 BLITZ ONE MR FOTO PHOTOS 01-4810-189-31 63. s- 641 100064 04/06/99 87.80 99.78 4 BLITZ ONE MR FOTO PHOTOS 01-4E10-189-31 ov 0*. • T(V. uni 100065 04/06/89 78.00 78.00 4 BLACKOUIAK 6 SONS BLOG MAINT 01-4341-099-17 66* ?» , •••-CK9 >»; T»l 10009S 04/06/89 838.14 CARGILL SALT SALT 01-4833-849-48 'rv ■ 1W CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE CHECK REGISTER AHOUNT VENDOR ITEH DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 04-10-85 PAGE C • P.O. t HE88A6E E28.14 • *«*-CKS 100100 04/06/85 .85^-05_ 85.05 • CASE POUER 6 EQUIP OIL FILTER 01-4E3g-g45-4e ««*-CK8 m! ■* 10014E *»4/06/S5 177.7E 177.7g • COPY DUP PR INC COPY HACHINE 01-4810-185-31 •••-CK8 •y 100818 04/06/85 11.65 11.85 • EXPRESS MESSENGER MESSENGER 01-4381-174-33 2 7i z: It Z.0 21 1 04/06/85 11.66 GENUINE PARTS CO MI8C EQUIP 01-4838-185-31 •••-CK8 a m r iA ZJ aaj 100856 100856 100856 04/06/85 04/06/85 04/06/85 158.16 10.38 45.77 GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO MI8C EQUIP MI8C EQUIP MI8C EQUIP 01-4838-845-48 78-4838-545-51 73-4838-565-58 m'• <9 .. 2t ^7 «»»«** 880.81 *. P4P-CK8 2. > 28 tt 30 100858 100850 04/06/85 04/06/65 13.50 13.50 GLENUOOD INGLEWOOD GLENUOOO INGLEWOOD COFFEE CUPS UTILITIES 01-4831-055-17 01-4834-055-17 2* ? vM •-< II -•3 10085S 100858 1 00858 04/06/65 04/06/65 04/06/65 6T.50- 13.50 13.50 GLENUOOD INGLEWOOD GLENUOOD INGLEWOOD GLENUOOD INGLEWOOD CORRECTION UTILITIE UTILITIES 01-4834-055-17 01-4834-055-17 01-4834-055-17 ■ A <2J 43 •44 if >6 100858 100858 04/06/65 04/06/65 13.50“ 13.50 13.50 • GLCNUODD INGLEWOOD GLENUOOD INGLEWOOD UTILITIES UTILITIE 01-4834-055-17 01-4834-055-17 <41 t<U ■'A -8, it •••-CK8 4l • • - -i 100860 04/06/65 175.00 175.00 • GOLF COURSE 8UPT A8N MEMBER DUES 74-4360-550-53 r.. »* c; %i 43 •••-CK8 t* -wt *.100865 04/06/85 55.00 GOVT TRAINING 8ERV M THOMTON 01-4356-185-31 tf ‘i*•! 100865 04/06/85 55.00 150.00 • GOVT TRAINING 8ERV M MORAN 01-4356-185-31 1*1 «a 4»^•••-CK8 41 4« 50 ?1 100851 04/06/85 15.10 HALLIN/DOROTHY TRAVEL/MILEAGE 01-4381-035-18 ft 63 15.10 • •••-CK8 71 •8i *? 100303 04/06/85 1,56. 85 HENN CTY FIN DIV ROOM BOARD 01-4358-080-16 “J ,-n 1909 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 04-10-89 PAGE 3 CHECK NO.. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR 7.EM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV.9 P.O. 9 MESSAGE 1,560.85 * I 3 3 ' •••-CK8 1 . • 1 100309 04/06/99 19.00 HENN CTY SHERIFF DPT REPAIR SPEAKER 01-4348-189-3!_ '7 • I 100309 I 04/06/99 117.10 135.10 • HENN CTY SHERIFF OPT BOOKING PEC 01-4359-090-16 **c i’ * ‘ ’i3 j «00309 04/06/99 16.65 16.65 • HENN COUNTY TREA8 STATE DEED TAX 01-4393-849-48 13 ; i IS •••-CKS 17 It 100330 04/06/99 96.97 ICMA RETRMHT CORP ICMA 3/80-4/8 ^_CJ-4140t039-18._. • J iC I 96.97 *:• •••-CK8 ir 100363(04/06/99 31 .69 31.69 • JAC0B9/T0n MILEAGE 01-4391-174-33 £3 ir I «««.CK8 oc. • • 100366 100307 100397 100397 IQ039T 100400 100408 04/06/99 376.75 376.75 • 04/06/99 51 .30 JET QUICK PRINT»N© KUEMN-TM0riA9 LETTERHEA09 01-4388-189-31 •••-CKS 04/06/99 04/06/99 5.50 5.50 -JL30 ___ 67.90 • KUEMN-TM0nA9 KUEMN-ThjnAO KU8MW-t*10WA8 _riILEACE_nAR nxLEAce nAR mLBACE «AR MTLE^EJRAR^ 01-4391-069-15 "01-4391-174-33 78-4391-549-91 73-4391-569-98 •••-CKS 04/06/99 149.17 149.17 • KU8T0n ELECTRONICS SPEAKER 01-4838-189-31 •••-CHS 04/06/99 4.833.50 4.833.50 * LAKEMTKA c6N9 DISf LNCD 01-4390-080-11 •l£-. OI 4$1 4i< s«- 'tr in' 8«i 100404 04/06/99 19.50 THE LAKER PUBLISHING 01-4388-069-15 •••-cks St Oi 541 100404 1 100404 04/06/99 04/06/99 40.00 79.19 137.69 * THE LAKER THE LAKER PUBLISHING PUBLISHING 01-4388-189-31 01-4388-174-33 65 • 85 • 7' 99* i •••**"•••-CK8 «»* 731 —?y. ! 1004&3 1 04/06/99 40.00 40.00 • LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 89 CITY BULUETON 01-4840-080-11 •4 75 1989 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 04-10-89 PACE 4 CHECK NO.DATE AHOUNT VENDOR ITEH DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV.• P.O. 8 HESSAGE a s'•••-CK8 4 • ' •100439 04/04/89 83.90 83.90 « LONG. 1..^ TRACTOR BAR 01-4838-849-48 1 ^ t ••••-CK8 1C II IZ 100441 04/06/89 49.14 49.14 • LONG LAKE TIRE TIRE REPAIR 01-4348-849-48 u •••-CK8 IB 100454 0^/t./89 51.59 HABUSTH-JEANNE TRAVEL 01-4381-174-33 1« ty 51 .59 • IB •••-CK8 i» sc ai 100447 100447 04/06/89 04/06/89 195.70 97.85 NED CTR HEALTH CARE NED CTR HEALTH CARE H08P INS APRIL HOSP INS APRIL 01-4151-039-18 01-4151-069-15 at at 100467 100447 100467 04/06/89 04/06/89 04/06/89 97.85 191.01 888.86 HEO CTR HEALTH CARE HED CTR HEALTH CARE HEO CTR HEALTH CARE H08P INS APRIL HOSP INS APRIL HOSP INS APRIL 01-4151-189-31 01-4151-174-33 01-4151-849-48 i as a« 871.87 m 17 •••-CK8 It sa JS 100488 04/06/89 817.80 817.80 • HPL8 HEALTH DEPT OTHER CONSULT t1-4306-189-31 »■ u :s •••-CK8 \A it >4 100486 04/06/89 95.85 95.85 • HPL8 STAR 6 TRIBUNE ADVERTISING 01-4388-069-15 Jt •••-CRB IB 100490 04/06/89_87.78 niNNEGASCO UTILITIE 01-4384-189-31 .!100490 100490 04/06/89 04/06/89 570.83 80.90 678.91 • niNNEGASCO HINNEGASCO UTILITIE UTILITlc 78-4384-549-91 73-4384-569-98 4Z 44' 4f •••-CK8 «• 4,| «s’ 100498 04/06/89 114.35 114.35 m HN CELLULAR TELE HOBILE PHONES 01-4380-189-31 :« 4k 4t iO •••••••••-CK8 9' «■ ai 100500 04/06/89 17.00 HINN COHM TELEPHONE 01-4320-**‘9-31 c e- ftt St 17.00 m e 7. 14 •••-CK8 y S >4 100518 04/06/89 85.00 HPELRA-BRYAN BROUN HEHBERSHIP 01-4380-189-31 i 1989 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 04-10-89 PACE 5 1 CHECK NO DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV.• P.O. •MESSAGEc185.00 8 4 ***-CKS 1 •'100S34 04/06/89 1.544.00 MOTOROLA INC PORT RADIO 14-4560-638-00 n• t 100S34 100S34 04/06/89 04/06/89 617.60 986.40 3^088.00 • MOTOROLA ZNC MOTOROLA INC PORT RADIO PORT RADIO 78-4560-549-91 73-4530-569-91 *iti ts 100535 04/06/89 13,356.85 13,356.85 • CITY OF MOUND FIRE CONTRACT 01-4317-138-38 !'. •••-CK8 ■ir 100545 04/06/89 74.80 74.80 NAVARRE AUTO REPAIR REPAIR CAR 01-4341-174-33 !» <1 100540 1U0S40 04/06/09 04/06/89 68.85 31 .50 99.75 * NATL COMPUTER NATL COMPUTER OTR 1 MNT-010 PRINTR OTR 1 MNT-IBM 3876 01-4340-189-31 01-4340-189-31 « u 14- «««-CK8 4S ss 11 100548 100548 100S48 04/06/89 04/06/89 04/06/89 13.05 19.67 866.64 NAVARRE HARDWARE NAVARRE HARDWARE NAVARRE HARDWARE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 01-4838-099-17 01-4838-189-31 01-4838-849-48 za 4*< JO' 100548 100548 04/06/09 04/06/89 15. 13 1 .39 316.60 • NAVARRE HARDWARE NAVARRE HARDWARE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 78-4838-549-91 73-4838-569-98 SI |»! iV •44-CKS (B SB' 10056C 10080S 100568 04/06/09 04/06/89 04/06/89 353.03 197.05 8.75 NOP N8P NSP UTILITIE UTILITIE UTILITIE 01-4384-099-17 01-4384-189-31 01-4384-175-34 If JO 100568 100568 100568 04/06/89 04/06/89 04/06/89 130.63 19.91 1,450.10 NOP N8P NSP UTILITIE UTILITIE UTILITIE 01-4384-849-48 01-43E4-E90-61 78-4384-549-91 1;^“ 41 *4f 100568 100568 04/06/09 04/06/89 768.91 50.95 8,9«1.33 « NSP NSP UTILITIE UTILITIE T3-43E4-569-9E T4-43E4-590-93 *». •««-CKS i 4W 100574 100574 04/06/09 04/06/09 63.00 113.00 176.00 * OFFICE PROD OF MN OFFICE PROD OP MN FLOP DISCS CABLE INST 01-4810-189-31 01-4340-189-31 44 BO 1* •*«-CK8 « fl B « ss «s 100597 04/06/09 3,656.40 3,656.40 • PUBLIC EMPL RET A8SN PERA 3/80-4/8/09 01-8V 1-000-00 B T 8 1SI M IT 100598 04/06/89 9.00 9.00 m PERA INS 1-iFE iNS HAY ■ 6i-4f58=189'3<r p -r 1989 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 04-10-09 PAGE 6 CHECK NO.. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. 0 MESSAGEr'' 1 |3‘•••-CKS ■ •100631 04/06/09 1,617.00 POLKA DOT RECYCLING RECYCLING FEE 01-439B-B95-65 1,617.00 • t^' a it •»*-CK8 !'*100643 04/06/09 fi0.41 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS APRIL 01-415B-069-15 It 100643 04/06/09 11.40 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS APRIL 01-415B-1B6-31 na 100643 04/06/09 4E.E7 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS APRIL 01-415B-1B9-31 ta 100643 04/06/09 C.70 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS APRIL 01-415B-1T4-33 14 100643 04/06/89 6.00 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INO APRIL 01-415B-E49-4E OB.70 • t? .13 •••-CKS 100650 04/06/09 6.00 R C INDENTIFICATI0N8 ID CARDS 01-4BE1-1B9-31 ao 6.00 * lu •••-CKO «; r44 1007C4 04/06/09 B,035.SB or TREA-8T BD6 IN8P 1ST QTR SURCHARGE 01-BBBB-000-00 1".B,035.BB a?•••-CKS <2« !•100740 04/06/09 7.90 OTREICHERO DOG MACE 01-4B3B-1B9-31 lac 7.90 • at aa 11 •••-CKO 14 100751 04/06/89 407.70 SUNDIAL BLDG OERVICE JANITOR 8ERV 01-4349-099-17 at 100751 04/06/09 BOB.60 8UNDXAL BLDG OBRVICB JANITOR 8ERV 01-4349-1B9-31 ii«690.30 • ar at as •••-CKS •4C 100778 04/06/09 79.00 TOLL CO DRILL 01-4B3B-B49-4B 4t' 4t 79.00 • 41 ««!•••-CKS ■‘-V-100015 04/06/09 40.61 US WEST connuN TELEPHONE 01-43B0-039-1B ;*•100015 04/06/09 40.61 U8 WEST cormuN TELEPHONE 01-43B0-059-14 100015 04/06/09 B4.30 U8 UE8T connuN TELEPHONE 01-43B0-069-15 -•!100015 04/06/89 176.77 US WEST connuN TELEPHONE 01-43B0-1B9-31 '‘•i 100015 04/06/09 40.61 US WEST conmiN TELEPHONE 01-43B0-174-33 100015 04/06/09 59.79 US UEST connuN ADVERTISING 01-43B0-175-34 •st 100015 04/06/09 40.61 US UEST connuN TELEPHONE 01-43B0-B49-4B :ta 100015 04/06/09 7.30 US WEST connuN TELEPHONE 7B-43B0-549-91 91 100015 04/06/09 17. OB US WEST connuN TELEPHONE 73-43B0-569-9B 94 100015 04/06/8V 51 .07 US UEST CONNUN ADVERTISING 74-43B0-590-93 •9 100015 04/06/89 B6.60 US UEST CONHUN ADVERTISING 74-43B0-590-93 9# ny 100015 04/06/09 100.90 US WEST CONHUN ADVERTISING 74-43B3-590-93 19d9 CITY OF ORONO CHECK MO. DATE AHOUWT CHECK REGISTER 04-10-09 PACE 7 _yCWP05_________________I TE|1_PE8CR IPTI ON_________ACCOyNT_Np_, INV. » P. 0 nESSACE_ _ 666.99 * •••r-CKS I 00081_______04/06/09 _$6^56_VILLAGE CHEVROLET 86.56 » SWITCH 01-4838-849-48 •**-CKS a a : 100030 04/06/09 158.00 158.00 * VOLKENANT 6 SONS INC PLOW SIDEWALKS 100SS1 04/06/09 _L0090t_-04/06/09^ 100908 04/06/09 I 00903 100903 .04Z46Z01L 04/06/09 100904 04/06/09 100905 04/06/09 100906 04/06/09 100907 100907 10090T 04/06/09 04/06/09 04/06/09 100909 04/06/09 100910 04/06/09 100911 04/06/09 100918 1.448.00 1.448.00 * W HENNEPIN HUMAN SER CONTRIBUTION _69,J)9._LAW ENF_LECAL JDE|L 69.00 • _35,0^ 35.00 • INTL CHIEF POLICE _LAW MANUAL _DUES_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 5.811,00 IMS/HN 195.00 5.406.00 • ins/MN HAIL MACHINE. OHAUS SCALE 154.00 154.00 • ENERGY VEH OER INC LITE BAR 63.30 63 30 9 BRAUN ENG TEST INC 640.00 640.00 9 ATTITUDE DEVELP INC SAND INSPEC h1<ilbo 06.60 130.08 130.08 M MEVISSEN n MEVISSEN M MEVISSEN MAG LITE MAC LITE MAC LITE 346.78 9 _S5^P__POLICE PURSUIT PROJ 8 REPORTS 85.00 9 7.63 NAAB TERI MILEAGE 7.63 9 _163^6.9_ 163.69 9 NORTH OTAR TURF INC PHYSICIAN DESK REF MOWER SHARP DESK REFERENCE 86.95 9 178.10 STANDARD SPRING CO REPAIR TRUCK 01-4833-849-48 99*-CKS 01-4305-100-81 99.-CKS 01-4840-189-31 01-4300-189-31 _M-4540-630-00 14-4540-630-00 01-4341-189-31 01-4305-849-48 01-4841-189-31 01-4833-849-48 78-4838-549-91 73-4838-569-98 01-4840-189-31 01-4301-099-17 74-4348-590-93 01-4840-189-31 01-4348-849-48 3C' ST' 34- 4^1 ■a: ts •4; It; ’•i iO u 1* *4ir; "I ^•1 il' **\ -I 198f CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE CHECK REGISTER AHOWT_________________—VENDOR__________________ITEM DESCRIPTION 1-10-1 ACCOWT NO. INV. • F.O _JLNE88ACE_ 100913 04/06/S9 100914 04/00/09 100915 04/06/09 100916 04/06/09 100917 04/06/09 100910 04/06/09 100919 100919 04/06/09 04/00/09 1009S0 1009S0 04/06/09 04/06/89 1009E1 04/06/89 100901 04/06/89 100988 04/06/89 894014 04/06/89 178.10 • 84.34 84.34 « TELEDYNE TOTAL POWER 50.00 50.00 PACE LAB INC 15.00 15.00 • M HALCECK 1.000.00 1.000.00 • DON RATH CEMENT CO 40.00 40.00 * MANCEL MITCHELL 17.688.11 17.608.11 8TEVEN8 WELL DRILL 886.90 89.10 316.00 * COMM FIN-CRIME ACCT COMM FIN-C81M8 ACCT 453.00mi- H8NN CO FORFEIT ATTY HENN CO FOKFCIT ATTY 7.95 ORONO PAYROLL ACCT 1 .35 9.30 • ORONO PAYROLL ACCT 5.00 5.00 * MINN WATER TREATMENT 41 .79 ALL STAR ELECTRIC 41.79 • 37.780.48 6.950.00 80.508.37 FUND 01 TOTAL FUND 14 TOTAL Fy^ND_78 TOTAL 1.984.91 1.797.50 FUND 73 TOTAL FUND 74 TOTAL 60.903.80 TOTAL SCREEN FLYWHEEL 01-4838-849-48 LAB ANALYSIS 01-4305-040-71 USED BUMPER 73-4838-569-98 REPAIR FRONT STEP 74-4343-590-93 DUES 01-4300-189-31 WELL MAINT 78-4345-549-91* FORFEITURE-T MAXWELL FOREXTURE-LJ OTTEN 01-3610-000-00 01-3610-000-00 FORFEITURE-T MAXWELL FORFEITURE-LJ OTTEN 01-3610-000-00 01-3610-000-00 EXCESS W/H MORAN 01-4151-189-31 EXCESS W/H TORAN 01-4158-189-31* RF'D PERMIT 1T76 01-3133-000-00 LUBE 6 PART8 01-4838-849-48 *4*-CK8 GENERAL FUND IMPROVE 6 EQUIP OUTLAY F WATER 0FERATIN6 FUND_ _ _ SEWER 0FERATIN6 FUND GOLF COURSE OPERATING FD m tob’NciL mmii irR10«89 \< . March 21, 1989 Orono City Council City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn. 55323 MAR27I989 Mayor Grabek and City Council members: I am an Orono resident of almost 25 years and I am having a real difficult time with what I am reading in the council minutes regarding County Road //116. First of all most of the arguments against it are so unfounded - it will NOT be a freeway, in fact it will be two feet narrower than Willow Drive south of the railroad bridge and south of Watertown Road. How much opposition v.as there in 1970 and 1972 when Orono did the improvements on Willow Drive in those areas? Second, it will NOT generate.imore traffic to Lake Minnetonka. In spite of what CounciImembers Callahan and Nettles believe not everyone is in love with Lake Minnetonka. I have lived on County Road ^6 for the entire time I have been in Orono and of course there is more traffic now than there was 25 years ago, but it is not a problem (if anything, McCully Road generates the traffic, not County //6). I also have a hard time with residents complaining about new developments. As you know, it is not the city that develops land, it is the landowner and new development generate more residents which in turn generates the need for better and more roads. I also happen to work for the City of Medina and in the five years that I have been there I have NEVER heard Lake Minnetonka mentioned in the talks of County Road ^^116. See copy of minutes from Medina city council meeting of August 16, 1977. Another thing t remember is that in a north-south road there is also a north. Will there not be some Orono residents that might use the northern portion of to help them get to some of the other beautiful lakes in northern Minnesota? Thanks for taking the time for my thoughts. Sandie Larson 4285 6th Ave. North Long Lake, Mn. 55356 cc: City Administrator Mark Bernhardson c.o I* 5!!15S.*2I«?it?a*thft^theynute8 read that the Council dlacussed the City laVX'anT-lnUi-J »lnt™» floor «a and conclude, elty ehould not enforce f ^ OM OF DUPLEXES nf fonlmr ordinance# Motion aarrled unanUoualy. The zIInlM**d»lnlat*a*®* la to contact Mr. J. W, Goebel, new owner of Burgees Eetatee lo appaar at tht Sept. 6th Council Meeting to sign a new performance contract. City AUoniey to prepare contract. in, cm OP PLTMOOTH - HOLY NAME CHURCH SEWER AND WATER Mrtiton by Tom Crosby to schedule a public hearing for Sept# 6, 1977 at 8 P# M# to , dtaouaa the AsseasBent process for Holy Name Church Sanitary Sewer and Water facilitlf City Attorney will make sure requirements of Chapter 429 are complied with# Reeonded by Nanoy Laurent, Opposing Wayne Neddermeyer. Motion carried# (n5 NOimf - SOUTH ROAD Tlia__ Counoll acknowledged receipt of le^er from Tad Jude ^ted August 1.6, 1977 regntdlng North to South Road l?e imnOET MEETING Motion by Arthur Theis, seconded by Tom Crosby Aiimiat 50. 1977 at 700 P. M. Clerk to notify Motion carried unanimously. to set the Budget Meeting for Tuesday all council persons the day before. 15. PUBLIC WORES DEPT. Nanoy lAurent and Ron Duran discussed the need to update the present road grader, thi eoBi of rebuilding the engine would be approximately $3000.00 to $7000.00. Also illBoueaed purchasing a 4-wheel drive pickup to be used for plowing snow, the present plokup in being used almost entirely by Paul Ogland. Ron Duran is to chock how much It would cost to rebuild the transmission on the 1972 Tandem Truck. 14. REVENUE SHARING FUNDS Motion by Tom Crosby, seconded by Bill Reiser to agree to comply with rules for receil of Revenue Sharing Funds. Entitlement Period //9 allocation for Medina will be $15,5? Motion carried unanimously. Payroll checks ^4603*46! 15. BILLS Motion by Tom Crosby, seconded by Bill Reiser to pay bills. In the amount of $2,600.25 Motion carried unanimously. 16. BUILDING INSPECTOR Ron ^ran Is to check into schooling for Building Inspecting for Paul Ogland. City Clerk Is Instructed to call Loren Kohnen to send resume of past experiences and salaR expectations, and also to appear at the Sept. 6th Council Meeting. 17. installing SIGNS - SYCAMORE TRAIL P Haney Laurent, seconded by Arthur Theis to install speed limit signs and " Children at play" signs on Sycamore Trail as per petition of resident -*^iea unanimously. 46 46 46 46 46 Le 46 46 NimiTBS OF THE PIANNIMG COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 20, 1989 ATTENDANCE 7:00 P.M. The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Chairman Kelley; Planning Commission members Johnson and Brown; Planning Commissioner Bellows arrived at 7:15 p.m. The following represented the City staff: Building and Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron and City Recorder Scheffler. Council Representative Barbara Peterson was in attendancer and CounciImember Callahan was also present. *1384 FRITZ GULLICKSON 99 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH VACATION OF DRAINAGE ft UTILITT EASEMENT PUBLIC HEARING 7:00 P.M. TO 7:10 PM. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. Gullickson was present for this matter. Zoning Administrator Mabusth briefly explained that a lot line rearrangement was previously done for the purpose of redefining lot boundaries of lots in the Holly Acres Addition. The drainage and utility easements that existed along the old lot lines were not vacated at that time. Mabusth suggested that vacation of such easements be required with any future lot line rearrangements of platted property. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Johnson, to recommend approval of this application. Motion, Ayes»4, Nays^O, Motion passed. (The motion was made on this application after the Rauschendorfer matter was heard so that a quorum was present for a vote.) #1386 CLIFFORD OTTER NORTHEAST QUADRANT AT INTERSECTION OF WILLON ROAD ft HIGHNAT 12 REZONING FROM RR-lB TO B~1 PUBLIC HEARING 7:40 P.M. TO 8:30 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. Clifford Otten and Robert D. LaPavor were present for this matter. Mr. LaFavor gave a presentation as to how the site will be developed and used. It will be used for a retail garden center and landscaping operation. There will be a management design headquarters, installation and construction services division, outdoor plant material storage, model garden displays, landscape supply storage and interior and exterior sales areas. At the MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 20, 1989 ZONING FILE #1386~OTTEN CONTINUED time the sketch plan review was done, the questions of buffering to the north and an east/west service road were discussed. Since that time, those items have been specifically addressed. An east/west service road outlot has been designated allowing for the setbacks required with a B-1 zoning. A retention pond has also been designated. Chairman Kelley suggested that the specifications of B-1 zoning be briefly reviewed. Mabusth informed the Planning Commission that there was an existing B-1 corridor to the east of the subject property. Should the Otten proposal be approved, it would extend that corridor. Initially it was proposed that Lots A and B be developed with multiple-family dwellings. Since then, however, the owner of Parcels A and B, has sold the individual lots for single family residential use. Mabusth further mentioned that there is a proposed subdivision that Mr. Otten will complete in the near future. Mabusth suggested that Pine Ridge Lane be vacated at the time of the subdivision and that access be secured to Lot B. Since Lots A and B will stay in single family residential use, the commercial line is now proposed to be moved up along the southern border of Dickey Lake Drive. Landscape buffering along that boundary was presented at the first commercial site plan review. Zoning Administrator Mabusth said that the B-1 zoning classification was not designed for the Highway 12 Corridor, as it is more compatible with limited neighborhood commercial. In comparing the B-1 zoning with the B-6, Mabusth questioned why design criteria was not established for the B-6 as it was for B- 1. She did not know why it would not be the same criteria as a PUD. Mabusth pointed out that the commercial use that exists to the east is not true B-1, it*s more of a shopping center commercial use. In Mabusth*s opinion, the PUD would be more *?.ppropriate for Mr. Otten*s proposal than the B-1. Mabusth suggested that the Otten application be forwarded on to the Council in order to receive conceptual direction and some form of a commitment regarding the approval of the PUD ordinance. Once the PUD ordinance has been approved and is in place, the Otten rezoning can be completed. Chairman Kelley expressed his concern involved with the resale and a more intensified retail use of this property in the future. He thought the use Mr. Otten was proposing was ideal for the location. Mabusth asked Kelley if he would be more comfortable with the POD zoning for this application since the PUD would require approval to change the use. She questioned whether the rezonlng of Lots 1 and 2 would occur as one parcel or whether the subdivision would be required at all. Bellows commented that if the application came in as one PUD for all 13 acres, that Mr. Otten may need to file the subdivision first or not at all. Mr. Otten interjected that he is not asking for a PUD. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 20, 1989 ZONING FILE #1386-OTTEN CONTINUED Chairman Kelley asked for input regarding a separate entrance off of Willow. Bellows believed that it would create too much congestion in that area. Mabusth stated that the City would not allow a separate access. Kelley asked how far the east/west road had to be from Highway 12. Mabusth said that she recollected it to be 300*. Kelley asked for input regarding an entrance/exit off of Highway 12. Brown indicated that he liked that less than the Willow Drive access. Mr. Otten said that the time was right to be discussing a proposed entrance/exit off of Highway 12 because of the proposed upgrading. MN DOT indicated that they would base their plans around Orono's decision for Mr. Otten's property access. Mr. Otten proposed at a minimum a right turn entrance/exit, but not a full Intersection. Kelley indicated that he would not be opposed to such a plan. Bellows did not believe that an entrance/exit off of Highway 12 would be required. Mr. Otten questioned why it would be necassary to bring people all the way through the intersection, if they could avoid it. Bellows would prefer the access to b:^ the service road access already designated off of Willow. Mr. Otten intented that proposed road to remain as an outlot designation until such time Mr. Rebers put in his road and until the status of Lot 2 is determined. Bellows asked Mr. Otten whether he would be willing to relocate his entry. Mr. Otten agreed. Chairman Kelley read a list of the acceptable uses within a B-1 zoning. Mr. Otten pointed out that the B-6 incorporated those uses and felt that there was no point in waiting for the B- 6. With respect to a PUD zoning, it was Mr. Otten’s understanding that it was his option whether he wanted a PUD; not that it was mandatory. Mr. Joel Walvatne, 710 Dickey Lake Drive, questioned whether adequate screening would be provided between his property and the garden center. Mr. Otten showed the Planning Commission pictures showing how the existing vegetation already provides screening. Mr. Otten said he would not be opposed to additional screening if necessary, but due to what is existing, his plans do not show anything addition**". In addition to the vegetation, there is a large berm separat ng Mr. Otten*s property from Mr. Walvatne*s. Mr. Chuck McKay, 725 Dickey Lake Drive, expressed his approval of Mr. Otten*s proposal. He asked for clarification regarding the service road. Kelley Informed him that it was Mr. Otten*s intention not to install the service road until everything to the east of the property is developed. Planning Commissioner Johnson asked whether the initial plans showed the service road through the middle of the property? Mr. Otten explained that initially that was being proposed. However, when the required 60* of road and additional setbacks from the road were taken into consideration, it would have used MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 20, 1989 ZONING FILE il386-OTTEN CONTINUED too much property. The next issue addressed was municipal sewer and water. Mabusth reported that the Rebers subdivision had been denied sewer connection to the existing Long Lake lines within North Brown Road. Therefore, Orono will have to provide that connection from its lines to the west. As far as water, Mabusth said that the B-1 zoning did not require municipal water. Mr. Otten said he intended to have an on-site well, even if municipal water was available. Zoning Administrator Mabusth suggested that Mr. Otten put in writing his reasons for preferring a B-1 zoning rather than a PUD for the benefit of the Council. Planning Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Otten what he intended to do with Lot 2? Mr. Otten said it would be held in reserve until such time that he was confident he would not need it for the garden center. Mr. McKay stated that he was very anxious to have this resolved, as it was affecting the sale of his home. Mr. Otten had indicated to Mr. McKay that he would work with any perspective buyers with regard to screening. He urged the Planning Commission to act as quickly as possible. Planning Commissioner Johnson indicated that he w' aid support the B-1 zoning. However, he did not concur with Lot 2 being included in the rezoning because there was no designated land use. Bellows said that she would approve the B-1. Kelley said that he approved of the project, but would prefer the PUD zoning. Brown concurred with Kelley. There were no further comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley to deny the B-1 commercial zoning for Lots 1 and 2, and recommend approval of the proposed project under the PUD zoning so the City would have the ability to approve any other use of the property. Kelley's motion failed due to a lack of a second. Planning Commissioner Brown questioned whether it would be possible to include a clause requiring approval of another use under the B-1 zoning. Mabusth responded that once the property is rezoned B-1, the only "controls" the City would have would pertain to a commercial site plan review. If the same building is used, there would be no additional review. Planning Commissioner Bellows believed that the Comprehensive Plan should provide the necessary criteria to allow Mr. Otten to proceed. She said that she was "distressed" that there was nothing currently in place to offer Mr. Otten in the way of zoning and this matter has been drawn out so long. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 20, 1989 ZONING FILE #1386-OTTEN CONTINUED It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Brown, to deny the B-1 commercial zoning for Lots 1 and 2, and recommend approval of the proposed project under the PUD zoning so the City would have the ability to approve any other use of the property. Mabusth questioned whether Kelley wanted to encourage the City to provide Mr. Otten with the capability of proceeding with a formal application even though the B~6 and PUD zoning ordinances have not yet been passed. Kelley said that the application could be filed and the applicant could begin working on the commercial site plan as a PUD. Mabusth informed Mr. Otten that he could subdivide first. Motion, Ayes«3, Johnson, N due to his wish to approve the B-1 zoning and allow Mr. Ow ;n to proceed with his project. MUNICIPAL FACILITY - SITE ANALYSIS PUBLIC HEARING 9:00 P.M. TO 9:35 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Chairman Kelley explained for the benefit of those in attendance, that the City of Orono was analyzing various sites for the location of a new city hall, maintr’^ance facility, and police department. Mr. David Kzoos of Boarman & Associates was present to advise the Planning Commission of the current status. Mr. Kroos said that a needs assessment study had been done to determine the facility needs for the police department, administration and public works facility. From that information, basic lot plan diagr2uns were developed and tested on each of the site options requested by the Council. After performing the needs assessment study, the Council determined that the existing municipal site and the sewer plant property were the two options to consider. Site criteria evaluations were then done which assisted Boarman in determining criteria priorities. As later requested by the Planning Commission and Council, the Highway 12- Old Crystal Bay Road property was included in the site analysis. The present facility site is zoned RR-lB. Once the setback requirements are applied, the buildabllity of this site would become very limited. If the site were rezoned to an R-lA, it would Increase the buildable area. The present site is centrally located and is historically familiar. To Mr. Kroos knowledge, there were no problems with the soils on this site, however the well may pose a problem for a sprinkler system. Chairman Kelley asked whether the possibility of acquiring adjacent property had been explored. CounciImember Callahan explained that there would be the need to acquire an additional 13 acres in order to have all the facilities located together. Consequently, the Council eliminated this site as an option for housing all three facilities. The sewer pond site currently has the sewer pond and the Metro sewer facility. It does have a substantial amount of MmUTBS OF THE PLHNHIH6 COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 20, 1989 MUNICIPAL FACILITY CONTINUED designated wetland. One option would be to have both the administration/police and public works facility on this site. Kelley questioned whether the 10.2 acres included the wetlands. Mr. Kroos said the 10.2 was the dry buildable portion of this site. The main drawback to this site would be the accessibility. There would be a sharp curve in the area of the property that would cause a severe turn into the site. If this site were seriously considered so should a second exit onto Old Crystal Bay Road. The Highway 12/Old Crystal Bay Road site appears to be very buildable, but has severe soils (Glencoe and Dundas). Bellows questioned whether the soils would be tested. Mr. Kroos replied that they would. In looking at the site and taking into consideration the soil ; and the adjacent properties that border the corners of the property, it would be very difficult to build on this site. Kelley commented that acquiring adjacent property would help alleviate that problem; Kroos concurred. The only access onto this site would be off of Old Crystal Bay Road. Kelley observed that another drawback to this site would be its location in relation to the majority of Orono. Zoning Administrator Mabusth reported that the Police Chief had commented that the police officers are no longer out in a designated "beat" around the clock. Due to this, centrally locating the police department is not crucial. Mr. Kroos added that it would only be beneficial for the administrative offices to be centrally located. A first draft of the evaluation sheets was done and the following options were determined: Option 1 would put City Hall and Police on the present site. Option 2 would put City Hall and Police on the sewer pond site. site. Option 3 would put City Hall and Police on the Highway 12 Option 4 would put City Hall, Police and Public Works on the sewer pond site. Option 5 would put City Hall, Police and Public Works on the Highway 12 site. Option 6 would put Public Works on the sewe pond site. Option 7 would put Public Works on the Higb-^ay 12 site. After reviewing these options, it was determined that the current site would be a good optio^' for locating the City Hall and Police. The sewer pond site is a good option for the Public Works as would the Highway 12 site if the soils are not as severe uv 14IH1ITBS OP THE PLANHIHG COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 20, mmiClPhL FACILITY CONTINUED as Initially indicated. The Police Department indicated that the current site may not be ideal due to the residential characteristic of tne surrounding area. Public Works indicated that the Highway 12 site would be most suitable because of the various materials that are brought in and out (sand, gravel, salt). The Council directed Boarman and Associates to further Investigate the soil conditions on Highway 12 and sewer pond sites. Six or seven borings will be taken in the near future. Planning Commissioner Brown questioned the convenience Involved with locating the three facilities together. Mr. Kroos said jt would mainly aid with the administrative functions of each department. Planning Commissioner Bellows asked what criteria would be used in making a fir»al determination for the site? Mr. Kroos said that it woulv. *joi1 down to location, function and cost. Bellows asked about the time frautte. Mr. Kroos said they would approximately one month off of the schedule indicated. Bellows stated that should the Planning Commission have alternative site locations they would like to have considered that would delay the scheduled t^me frame even further. Mr. Kroos said that he would hope a site that was not acceptable to everyone would be chosen just to keep the project on schedule. Kelley asked if the maximum cost of a site had been discussed. Mr. Kroos said that there had not been any discussion regarding budget. Mr. Kroos asked Chairman Kelley if he had any additional sites in mind? Kelley said that he would give the subject ^ome consideration and let the City Administrator know of any suggestions. CounciImember Callahan commented that the {approval to examine any other sites would have to come through che Council and encouraged Kelley to make his suggestions as soon as possible. Plann'*^i* ? rsnissioner Brown expressed his pi-)farence for locating ip M whree -’facilities on the Highway 12 propert* Chairman Kelley said that he was strongly opposed to the sewer pond property and would prefer that a si'-e location on Highway i^' be on the north side. He believed that locating the fad lit ter on Highway 12 might give Orono more of an J -^Jtity. Mr. Kroos added that the Highway 12 location would hav Flaming Commissioner Bellows concurred w‘ She relieved th^t it would be absolutely i facilities on thw sewer plant property, set a precedent due to the sensitr v Planninr. Commissioner Johnson stater’ h. 'lete V' ' ' ties. • wn. .u the would /. property. 'j*j 1 iked the Highw-^y 12 property, as well as the cur There e no cr> ‘ s room the publ.f': and the puMir hearing closed. •rydiig this matter MINUTBS OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 20, 1989 #1261 JOE RAUSCHENI a ^RFER 3895 SHORELINE DRIVE VARIANCE CONTINUATION OP PUBLIC HEARING 7:10 P.M. TO 7:30 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. The Rauschendorfers were present for this matter. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron informed the Planning Commission that this applicarion had been brought forward approximately a year ago. At that time, the Planning Commission requested additional information and provided the applicants with conceptual direction. The applicants were now providing more informalIcn with respect to their plans to add a 4* addition onto the lake side of the house and build an attached garage to the west. The applicants* proposal for the garage would only allow 6* between the applicants* and the neighboring residential structure. Chairman Kelley expressed his opinion of a 6* separation being inadequate, especially for fire safety standards. The applicants were confused about the 10* setback requirement from a lot line, not the neighboring structure. Kelley and Gaff: In clarifit-d this so that the applicants understood. Mr. Rauschendorfer said that using such standards would allow them 17-1/2* for the garage. In order to build a 20* garage, they would need to cut in'-o the house 2-1/2*. The east and street sides of the house woul^. remain the same. Applicants* proposal would reduce hardcover in the 0-75 and 75-250 setback areas. Chairman Kelley said that it was Orono*s policy that whenever a foundation was replaced, the house should be moved to meet the specified setbacks. Kelley asked the applicants if they intended to place the new foundatioi 'actly where t!ie current footing vere located. Mr *’<*chr :fer replied that three sides and half of the front ust *ie same current footings. The foundation does not ext er the screen porch. Planning Commissioner Jo a believed that the lot was too small to accomodate the applicants* proposa1. Planning Commissioner Bellows concurred with Johnson, adding that- the only improvement she could foresee would be a single stall rarage. In her opinion, allowing the variances requested would r.%=ike a "bad situation worse". Planning Commissioner Brown questioned the practicality of a long, narrow garage that would allow for two cars parked end to end. Gaffron replied that the garage would encroach too much toward County Road 15 or toward the lake. Chairman Kelley expressed his belief the Rauschendorfers were entitled to a garage. Planning Cc... -sloner Frown proposed using a firewall if the variance for . garage wtire approved. MIHUTBS OP THE PLAMNIHG COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 20, 1989 ZONING PILE «1261-RAOSCHENDORPER CONTINUED Zoning Administrator Mabusth asked the Rauschendorfers if it was necessary to replace the foundation. She suggested to the Planning Commission that if Rauschendorfers intended to proceed in that manner, they would need to get approval at this time. Mr. Rauschendoifer replied that water damage had occurred to the east side of the foundation. Chairman Kelley stated that he could not approve any further encroachment toward the lake or anything less than a 10* setback from the west property line. He would approve a single stall garage as long as it met that setback. Mr. Rauschendorfer explained that a single car garage would interfere with parking and turn around capabilities. Kelley suggested placing the garage in the turn around area. Mrs. Rauschendorfer explained that there was a timber wall in that location. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Bellows, to recommend approval of a 6.23* east side setback variance; no west side setback variance; a 19.98' street setback variance; and a 17' lakeshore setback variance. The hardcover should not exceed existing amounts. If the foundation needs to be replaced within 75' of the lake, approval is recommended as long as proper erosion control is exercised and the foundation remains in the same location. Motion, Ayes«2, Nays*2. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Brown, to recommend approval as depicted in Chairman Kelley's motion, with the exception of allowing the attached garage to be approximately 6' from the west lot line (4' variance), providing that a firewall be installed in the garage. Kelley asked if the 4* variance would include an overhang. Mabusth stated that if the overhang was less than 1-1/2' it would not be considered an encroachment. She added that drainage would have to be directed away from the adjacent property. The motion failed due to a lack of a second. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to deny the request for the 8' west side se^-back variance and the 21' lakeshore setback variance. The remainder of Johnson's motion reflected the motion made by Kelley with regard to the hardcover and foundation. Mabusth asked for clarification regarding the applicants' statement that a single stall garage would not allow for parking and turn around. After some discussion, it was determined that there should be room to park the additional car. The issue of removal of the temporary shed was discusred. Bellows stated that the shed must be removed. Johnson concurred that the shed be removed. Motion, Ayes»3, Brown, Nay because of his belief that a 2 car garage should be allowed if possible and that a previous representation had bee made to the applicants that a 10' separation from the neighbo. .g structure would be allowed. MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 20, 1989 #1326 MATZATA COUNTRY CLUB 200 MATZATA BOULEVARD CLASS II PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 8:30 P.M. TO 9:00 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. Ronald Lauer was present for this matter. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that he had received the hydrologic analysis and had talked with the City Engineer with regard to drainage. It was the City Engineer's opinion that drainage could be effectively handled if a retention basin was installed. A retention basin would hold back more runoff than the development of this property would create. Gaffron stated that the property at 139 Chevy Chase would be the most affected and would need the most protection. The basin would allow for a slower discharge of water in the case of a major storm, rather than allowing water to freely run down the slope onto the properties below. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that he still needed to receive a site plan and drainage plan from Mr. Lauer. Gaffron showed the Planning Commission the plan he had pieced together depicting the proposed foot print of the house. This was done to get a better idea of the conflicts of the house location to the septic system location. In so doing, it was determined that there would be conflicts. Due to steep topography, it would be likely th/tc the house would be a walkout at the south end. Grading w. II need to be done to put in a turn around driveway and this would bring forth questions as to how that grading would affect drainage on neighboring properties. Gaffron said there were still many site planning questions to be answered before a building permit would be issui^d. Kelley believed that those issues needed to be sol^»5u before the subdivision occurs. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron said that he had received a copy of a proposed easement that provides the applicant with lega** access to the property. The City would ask that half of a 50' outlot be created for a future road. There is currently a private road that is split between the properties to the north and south of the private easement road that serves the 5 or 6 houses in that area. Bellows asked why the road would not be public if there will now be 7 houses on it. Gaffron stated that when that particular subdivision had been done, the road was allowed to be a private road. Mr. Brooke Nelson asked about the results from the soil testing done on the property. Gaffron informed him that the soils were clay loams and due to that and seasonal high water tables, the property would require mound systems. Chairman Kelley asked Mr. Lauer if the City had received KmUTBS OF THE PIAMNIliG CONMISSIOH HEBTING MARCH 20, 1989 ZONING PILE «1326-NAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB CONTINUED written confirmation from the Wayzata Country Club indicating their support for Mr. Lauer's proposal. Gaffron replied that he had not received such a letter. Kelley stated that he would have a hard time going forward without that information and reminded Mr. Lauer that providing that information was a requirement. Planning Commissioner Bellows stated that Mr. Lauer had not provided an adequate site and drainage plan. She said that what little information she had received, had been coropiliid by staff. Mr. Lauer explained that he was merely trying to buy this property from the Wayzata Country Club and was not ready to build on it at this time. Therefore, he did not have specific grading and drainage plans since there was no specific house plan. Bellows told him that he could focus on the basic grading issues without needing a full scale architectural plan. Mr. Brooke Nelson, 141 Chevy Chase Drive, presented a letter from Mr. Leo Hauser. He also expressed his own concerns regarding drainage from the property Mr. Lauer is purchasing. He encouraged the Planning Commission and the City Staff to visit the Chevy Chase properties during times of peak runoff. Mr. Nelson explained the drainage pattern that occurred when he first bought his property. He said that he dug a small trench along the side of his house to facilitate the drainage to the street. However, since that time, the road was raised and the lot in front of his house was filled in and graded. A culvert was installed, incorrectly in his opinion, under his driveway and consequently his driveway is sinking. He said that any runoff from Mr. Lauer's would aggravate that situation. Kelley asked his opinion of the retention pond being installed for the purposes of slowing runoff? Mr. Nelson said that he would be in favor of the pond if it works. He questioned where the liability would lie if it did not work. Kelley believed that any recourse would have to come from the property owner, not the City of Orono. Mr. Albert Greig, 137 Chevy Chase Drive, informed the Planning Commission of his understanding of the current drainage pattern. He said that there was once a 14* pile of dirt on the lot across from his house and Mr. Nelson. It was finally graded, but was left in such a way that it is higher than the road. As a result, water that once ran into that area, now cannot. It was his opinion that the hardcover on Mr. Lauer's property, once it is developed, will cause water to runoff of that property rather than soaking into the ground. He said that the current runoff is such that it runs in a stream that is 10' to 12' wide and 1* deep, and runs for three or four days. He reiterated Mr. Nelson's request to have persons from the City witness this runoff first hand. Mr. Greig also stated that the water table in that area was high and added to the problem. He was concerned about the retention pond raising the water table even higher. Chairman Kelley informed Mr. Nelson and Mr. Greig that Mr. Lauer was not responsible for solving their existing drainage MIHUTBS OF THB PIANNIIIG COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 20, 1989 ZONING PIIE #1326>NATZATA COUNTRY CLUB CONTINUED problems. His only responsibility is not to exaggerate the existing condition. There were no further comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Bellows, to table this matter until the four requirements previously requested by the Planning Commission are met. Motion, Ayes»4, Nays~0, Motion passed. #1366 LOREN BUTTERFIELD 3925 NATERTOflN ROAD PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION RECONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Mr. Butterfield was present for this matter. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron reminded the Planning Commission that they had previously reviewed Mr. Butterfield's application for subdivision. Since that time, Mr. Butterfield has been working with staff on the concerns Involved with the easements for wetlands and setbacks. Mr. Butterfield was requesting lar.fication on the Planning Commissions* recommendation that no structures be allowed south of the Luce Line. After the Planning Commission review, staff received verification from the DNR that the easement to cross the Luce Line was a public easement and not for Mr. Butterfield only. Planning Commissioner Brown recollected that the objective of the Planning Commission was to keep traffic crossing the Luce Line to a minimum. Planning Commissioner Johnson asked where the easement was located in relation to Lot 2. Gaffron showed him that it does not extend to Lot 2. Kelley observed that in the event Mr. Butterfield sold Lot 2, there would be no way to access it. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that an easement would have to be granted from Lot 1 or Outlot B to access Lot 2. Bellows stated that she was opposed to encouraging the crossing of the Luce Line, even though that is currently being done. Mr. Butterfield stated that he did not understand why, if he had 5 acres of land, he could not have an accessory structure. Bellows clarified that the Planning Commission was only recommending no accessory structures south of the Luce Line. Kelley questioned why Mr. Butterfield did not combine all of the Lots on the south side of the Luce Line. Mr. Butterfield explained that he had uses for the other lots and minimum acreage requirements that he had to meet to retain his agriculture status. Planning Commissioner Johnson recollected that he was concerned about the possibility of a residence being built on Lot 2 south of the Luce Line. However, he concurred with Mr. Butterfield, in that it seemed ridiculous to disallow him any accessory structures south of the Luce Line. imiUTBS OF THE PLAHNING COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 20, 1989 ZONING FILE #1366-BOTTERFIELD CONTINUED It was moved by Planning Commissioner Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Bellows, to reaffirm the recommendation that no accessory structures be allowed on OutLot A or B south of the Luce Line. This recommendation is based on the concern that the easement across the Luce Line is not between Outlot A and Lot 2. Motion, Ayes*3, Johnson, Nay, Motion passed. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron asked for clarification as to the setbacks from the Luce Line required for placing accessory structures on the north half of the property. Gaffron pointed out that if Mr. Butterfield's application involved a typical 2-acre subdivision, accessory structures would be allowed within 10* of the rear lot line and Luce Line right- of-way. Kelley replied that the Planning Commission would recommend the standard setbacks. The third area of concern was that of the setbacks for principal structure for the north side of the property. The Planning Commission had indicated a preference for a 100* setback. Mr. Butterfield indicated that he would have no problems with that setback. There were no further concerns on behalf of Mr. Butterfield. #1374 FRBSBNATER FOUNDATION 2500 SHADTWOOD ROAD SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 9:50 P.M. TO 9:55 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. Marty Jessen, President of the Freshwater Foundation, was present for this matter. Mr. Jessen explained that he was requesting a subdivision of the 7.4 acres upon which the Freshwater Foundation was located. The subdivision would leave 5.1 acres of dry buildable for the Institute and the remaining 2.3 acres, comprised mainly of wetlands, would become part of Tract A, Parcel 1. This subdivision had previously been approved by the City Council in 1973, but was never filed. The subdivision would allow the 5.1 acres with the buildings to be successfully transferred to the University of Minnesota. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Bellows, to recommend approval of the subdivision of a lot line rearrangement. Motion, Ayes*4, Nays*0, Motion passed. MIHDTBS OP THE PIAHNIHG CQHMISSIOH HEETIHG MARCH 20, 1989 #1376 DALB 6 CHRIS PALM 1710 SHADYNOOD ROAD VARIAMCB COHT1HOAT .OH OP PUBLIC HBARIMG 10:20 P.M. TO 10:21 P.M. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Planning Commissioner Brown, to recommend denial of the hardcover and setback variances requested by the applicants. Motion, Ayes»4, Nays»0, Motion passed. #1383 LILLIAH BOHAHDBR 3200 NORTH SHORE DRIVE PUBLIC HEARING 9:57 P.M. TO 9:58 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mrs. Bonander explained that she wished to replace her deck and would require an average setback variance and hardcover variance to do so. Ms. Patricia Gonion, 3186 North Shore Drive, stated that the existing deck is deteriorating and is quite an eyesore. She was in favor of Mrs. Bonander's plan to replace the existing deck. There were no further comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to recommend approval of the decrease in hardcover to 35.16% in the 75-250* setback area and the average lakeshore setback variance. The hardship with this application is the long driveway and the improvement of existing conditions. Motion, Ayes»4, Nays»0, Motion passed. #1385 BIG ISLAND BOARD OF GOVERNORS BIG ISLAND VET'S CAMP CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 9:59 P.M. TO 10:00 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. Alan Wisdorf, a representative for the Big Island Board of Governors was present. Zc g Administrator Mabusth explained that the Planning Commiss. • would be reviewing a request for a conditional use permit Hw 30 overnight camping sites. Fifteen acres has been set aside for this purpose. The maintenance crew will be responsible for maintaining low weeds and underbrush within 100* radius of the entire camp site. The City does not have any information regarding the existing septic facilities and will be conducting regular inspections this summer to evaluate them. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. MINUTBS OF THE PLAHNIIK: CONMISSIOH MEETIHG MARCH 20, 1989 It was moved by Planning Commissioner Johnsonr seconded by Planning Commissioner Brown, to recommend approval of a conditional use permit for overnight camping for 30 camp sites. Motion, Ayes»4, Nays»0, Motion passed. #1387 MARGARET ROSSIMG 130 CTGMBT PLACE AFTER THE FACT VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 10:00 P.M. TO 10:19 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. The applicant was present for this matter. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that the old deck was located approximately 14* from the property line. The new deck extends 11*4" from the rear property line only in the northeast corner of the house. Planning Commissioner Bellows questioned whether the deck was completed? Mabusth answered that there were still minor finishing touches to be done. Ms. Rossing built the deck without realization that a building permit was needed. After review of the file on this property, Mabusth could not find that a permit had been issued for the original deck, nor was it a part of the building permit application when the house was built. Ms. Rossing commented that the original deck was totally rotted when she bought the house and needed to be replaced. Mabusth stated that a variance would have been required to build the original deck due to the pre-1975 codes which required a 30* setback from the rear lot line; the principal structure is located 30* from the rear lot line. Since that time, the zoning codes require a 50* setback from the rear lot line. Planning Commissioner Bellows asked Ms. Rossing who she had hired to build the deck. Ms. Rossing replied that her sons had built the new deck. She said that the project began in an attempt to repair the original deck. As the project progressed, it was determined that the old deck was rotted beyond repair and was eventually replaced. Kelley observed that the deck was enlarged when it was replaced. Ms. Rossing said that actually the new deck does not encroach any closer to the rear lot line than the old deck, it just encroaches in a different location. She reiterated the fact that the old deck was rotted and unsafe and that she had a sliding glass door that would have a 5* dropoff were it not for the deck. Planning Commissioner Bellows questioned whether approval of this variance would be given if it were not after-the fact. Kelley stated that he would not have had difficulty in recommending approval, if the existing deck was merely replaced and not enlarged. Chairman Kelley asked whether Ms. Rossing paid a fine for the after-the-fact variance fee. Mabusth replied that she had not been fined because she is the homeowner and was performing the construction herself. MIHUTBS OF THE PIANNIH6 COMMISSION MBBTING MARCH 20, 1989 ZONING FILE #1387-ROSSING CONTINUED Chairman Kelley expressed his preference for requiring the new deck to encroach no further toward the lot line than the original deck. Bellows added that she did not believe it was proper to waive the fine in this case. Mabusth reiterated her earlier comment that it had not been the City's previous policy to fine a homeowner for after-the-fact variances and permits, unless they were repeat offenders. She added, however, that the Planning Commission could recommend a change in that policy if they wished. Bellows said that was her wish. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Bellows, seconded by Planning Commissioner Brown, to recommend denial cf the after- the-fact variance to further encroach into the pre-existing 14' setback and that the property owner be required to restore the previously established setback distance. The remainder of the structure may be retained as is, but that the applicant be fined appropriately. Motion, Ayes*2, Kelley, Johnson, Nay, due to their wish to not fine the applicant. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Johnson, to recommend the same motion proposed by Planning Commissioner Bellows, with the exception of the fine. Motion, Ayes“2, Nay, Brown, Bellows. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Johnson, to recommend denial of the after-the-fact variance to further encroach into the pre-existing 14' setback and that the property owner be required to restore t^e previously established setback distance. The remainder of the structure may be retained as is. Motion, Ayes»-4, Nays*0, Motion passed. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Bellows, seconded by Planning Commissioner Brown, to fine the applicant for the after- the-fact variance. Motion, Ayes*2, Kelley, Johnson, Nay. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT RBFXEN & FINAL ACTION Chairman Kelley suggested tabling this item due to the fact that three Planning Commission members were absent. Kelley felt it would be more beneficial to have a separate meeting to discuss this item. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Bellows, to table this item. Motion, Ayes*4, Nays»0, Motion passed. PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 21, 1989 MINUTES It was moved by Planning Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to approve the minutes of the February 21, 1989, Planning Commission Meeting. Motion, Ayes«4, Nays^O, Motion NIHUTES OF THE PIANNIEG COMMISSIOH MEETING MARCH 20, 1989 passed. PLANHIMG COMMISSION ^(BPRESBNTATIVE It was agreed that Planning Commissioner, Jeffrey Johnson, would represent the Planning Commission at the April 10, 1989 City Council Meeting. ADJOURNMENT The March 20, 1989, Planning Commission Meeting adjourned at 10:30 p.m. L5 U W IS j; Metropolitan |Vy^t^^i!889c >uMears Park Centre. 230 March 27, 1989 Fifth Street. St. Paul, f L« • iiission isota 55I0I 6ll 222-8423 O To Those Interested In the Orono Interceptor Sewer Construction Schedule: Construction is scheduled to begin on the Orono Interceptor Sewer Improvement Project as soon as weather permits. Due to requests that the road not be closed during the prime summer recreation season, the closure of roads has been scheduled to begin as early as possible. County Road 51 will have to be completely closed to traffic for most of the month of April. Affected is the portion of County Road 51 from County Road 135 to Baidur Park Road. The proposed detour around the construction area is via County Roads 19, 84 and 135. The necessary two-week closure of County Road 19 has liso been rescheduled, not for August, but for sometime in May. (Ct is not yet known exactly when those two weeks will L«.) County Road 19 will be closed from Fagerness Point Road north to County Road 51. Responding to the concerns of area businesses and residents, the MWCC made these changes in a special agreement with the contractor, in order to speed up construction. If everything goes according to plan, all roads should be reopened by Memorial Day, and should remain so for the rest of the srmmer. The Orono Interceptor project should be completed by late summer. The project will double sewer capacity for Orono and Minnetonka Beach and reduce the overflow of untreated sewage into Lake Minnetonka. Thank you for your interest and your patienc i questions, you can call me at 229-2100. Sincerely, If you have further Pauline A. Langsdorf Community Relations Officer PAL:cmj Equal Opportunify/Affirmalive Action Employer •0) Metropolitan Waste Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth ti, yic^ta pmol March 27, 1989 612 22^1^1 Dear Concerned Businessperson: Last October 26 you abbended a meoblng of bho Westonka Area Chamber of Commerce, at which MWCC staff discussed construction of the Orono Interceptor Sewer improvements Project. Although MWCC community .elations officer Diane Wanner, who was there that day, is no longer with the MWCC, she left instructions for meeting attendees to be apprised of whether anything could be done about their requests for changes in the road closing schedule. The Westonlca Chamber requested that the closing of County Roads 19 and 51 be scheduled sc as not to interfere with the prime summer recreation season. This has been done. construction on County Road 51 has been rescheduled fcr early this spring. Unfortunately, the road will have to be completely c^sed to traffic for much of the month of April. Affected is the portion of County Road 51 from County Road 135 to Baldur Park Road. The proposed detour around the construrtion area is via County Roads 19, 84 and 135. The necessary two-week closure cf County P' ad 19 has also been rescheduled, not for August, but for sometime in May. yet known exactly when those two weeks will be.) County Road 19 will be closed from Fagemess Point Road north to County Road 51. Responding to the concerns of area businesses and residents, the MWCC made these changes in a special agreement with the contractor, in order to speed up construction. If everything goes according to plan, all roads should be reopened by Memorial Day, and should remain so for the rest of the summer. The Orono Interceptor project should be completed by late su^er. The project will double sewer capacity for Orono and Minnetonka Beach and reduce the overflow of untreated sewage into Lake Minnetonka. Thank you for your interest anc your patience questions, you can call me at 229-2100. Sincerely, If you have further Pauline A. ingsdo- Community Relations Officer PAL:cmj EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER “SAVE THE LAKE” RECOGNITION DINNER Proceeds donated to ‘Save the Lake’ Fund to help fight Eurasion water milfoil WEDNESDAY, APRIL 19,1989 ^7' ■ LofdFietche of line Lake Sauteed (^icken Breast with BiandVvOrMm Sauce ■r-•*7 r“ ^El^gttBifieLPread SAVE CerffieLAKE •V- ^riov^ . '.i • $25.00 per person - (includes tax and gratuity) 6:30 Cocktails - Cash bar 7:30 Dinner 8:30 Program and Awards - . -r* * • - ■ Limited reservations available : J# 1 " • Tables of eight may be reserved for ' - a group. Persons desiring to sit v j together should combine reservations. All table seating assigned.;;^ r • ' please COIt^PLETE AND RETURN IN ENVELOPE Pa0VID£0 . . ^ ””T” . rv V ■■ ' .i’■ ■ ‘ \ Please list all guests separately for rese '"id table placement All seating will be assigned in order received. - f -----------..........................................................................................................,.,... ^ _________ t«.,“ l,' f.T-' rj':r9'‘ *-•' .i>'-■ -. 3>^^> »*’* ---------------------------------— - • ‘'tJ'Vl/'ri. - ' vi»7*i '"r ___________________________ :», .- ' n.‘•'’ ■“ ..’t w<•..••.■..•>“<' .y . .............................. ■ ' ■ - ----------------------------------^^—“•- vi-***,*!!^ .fvj'rv'>Vl~6. ■Si'-- —. ■» r ^ -. * ’17.' * 7 * 11^—.—— ' — •-.w: w 7!i;v ::rV^ ■V.: ::-m'...- . ■.----------------:.................... ...... .... r* L. . ,1 * All checks for above reservations, pav’ble to LMCO ’Save the Lake' Fund must l>« received at LMCD headqua'ters oy April |4. ^ r •■• • V' • '-ir-' Ouestions may be directed to 473-7C'J3. ' ^ _________ .7^77..£7tv . ■ • ’-i*« S;: -'4 V '*■ ■■■■^ -• - - • ^ ■ "* »•.«'.■ ^ 4-i> w«*. • ~ Friday Saturday Monday Wednesday Thursday Friday Monday LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 473-7033 L.N.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE • .April 1989 4- 7-89 4- 8-89 4-10-89 4-12-89 4-13-89 4-14-89 4-17-89 Wednesday 4-19-89 Wednesday 4-26-89 Wetlands Protection Subcommittee of Advisory Committee 1:00 p.m., Minnetonka City Hall, Police Conference Room, lower level Public Hearing: Minnetonka Boat Works (Orono) Density and New Dock License Water Structures & Environment Committee 7:30 a.m., LMCD Office, Wayzata Bidder's Pre-Bid Conference, Service Contract, Eurasian Water Milfoil Harvesting 2:00 p.m., LMCD Office, Wayzata Advisory Committee 7:00 p.m.. Tonka Bay Village Hall Bid Opening: Service Contract, Eurasian Water Milfoil Harvesting 2:00 p.m., LMCD Office, Wayzata Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force 8:30 a.m.. Freshwater Foundation, Navarre Public Hearing: Minnetonka Boat Works (Wayzata) Density and New Dock License Lake Use Committee 4:30 p.m., LMCD Office, Wayzata Annual Dinner and "Save the Lake" Recognition Evening 6:30 p.m.. Lord Fletchers, Spring Park Regular Meeting, Board of Directors 7:30 p.m., Tonka Bay Village Hall To be announced:Lake Use Subcommittee of Advisory Committee Lake Access Subcommittee of Advisory Committee On-Shore Facilities Subcommittee of Advisory Committee 4-3-89 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 473-7033 EVENTS SCHEDULE April 1989 Saturday 4-22-89 Hollday-Johason Grapple Contest 12:00 a.m. to 2 p.m. Lord Fletchers* Coffee Cove 3-31-89 o TT HENNEPIN COMMUNITY HEALm DEPARTMENT Health Services Building - Level 3 525 Portland Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 iJ DATE:March 15. 1989 TO:Interested Individuals and Organizations a ^ FROM:Sue Zuidema. Director ^ Community Health Department SUBJECT:Notification of Development of the 1990-91 CHS Plan The complete 1988-89 Hennepin County Community Health Services Plan, approved by the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and the Minnesota Department of Hec'th Is avaltabie for review at the following locations: KAnneapolls Public Library • Government Documents 300 Nicollet Mail Minneapolis Minnetonka Public Library 17505 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka Hennepin County Government Center A-2400 300 South Sixth Street Minneapolis Hennepin County Community Health Department Level 3 Health Sen/ices Building, 525 Portland Avenue Minneapolis The plan incorporates the plans of the four municipal Boards of Health (Bloomington, Edina, Minneapolis, and Richfield) as well as those of the Hennepin County Board of Health. Hennepin County and the four municipal Boards of Health staff and Advisory Committees have started the planning process for the 1990-91 Hennepin County Community Health Services Plan Update. Present programs will be evaluated, community health problems and needs will be assessed between now and the end of this summer. Public meetings on the 1990-91 CHS Plan Update will be held in August of 1989. if you have any questions or comments about the CHS Planning Process and/or the development of the 1990-91 Hennepin County Community Health Services Plan Update, please contact Jim Mara, Program Analyst. 348-3969. HENNEPIN COUNTY on equal opportunity employer : NEWSLETTER ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0^278 N[ if ^'^NrH NCt lONGLAKf VIAF’LF PLAIT, MEDINA MINNE10NKA [if. A( H ( iMQNCJ Ol D ( FfYST AL iiA> ‘^{ iAD - It, . i AKi MINNESOTA ^sr, ^ ORONO SCHOOL BOARD [>avid McKown, Chairman 479-1692 Don Anderson, Vice Chairman 479-1810 Lucie Taylor, Treasurer 473-1189 Kilty Crosby, Oerk 478-6037 Jim Franklin, Director 479-2130 John Maresh, Director 475-3197 ! ! APRIL. 1989 \dniiuistra five No tcs Gratitude and appreciation to all who voted in the bond referewJumonMaidi21. *n« votere substantial approval of the proposed facilities will provide needed resources for our educational program. lAb anticipate oompletkm of tfte dassroom additions and swimnang pool by the fan of 1990. ^3edal dunks are due to tihe over one hundred volunteers (Concerned Faients for Orono Better Education) who worked on bdulf of die proposed facilities. The quality of those who serve and those who are served uldmatdy determines the quality of a school district. It is a rdadvdy simple equation. The substantial interest in educaboiv the wUlingness to provide resources for education, and the concern for education of our students makes this school community very ^)edaL How fortunate are those of us who serve to be in suA a supportive community. OnbdhalfofthestudenlSythank you. Dr. Thomas B.Mkh Superintendent Heroes Just Happen Family entertainment again comes to the OHS stage April 13,14,15, when the drama department presents its spring comedy Heroes Just Happen. A comedy about high school days. Heroes Just Happen tells the story of Joe Thomson, who just happens to have the same name as a great football hero and popular all-around boy from another school. Everyone at Ivy Lane High School assumes that Joe, the real hero, has just transferred to their school. The teachers are all excited as is every student in this small high school, and, of course, the complications and lau^ are endless. Playing the ’T>erd Joe" is Ned Brown; the "hero Joe" is Peter Durheim Playing eccentric teachers are Allison Rice, Wendy ISSUE NO. 8 APR - 3 1989 Gabriel, Holly Goring, Andy Mechavich, Brady Flaherty, and LaisCTvistiansoa Unique students at Ivy Lane include Allie Morgan, Steph March, JuUe Fields, Greer Vogt, Fernanda Fadel, Hilary Rose, Mindy Anderson, Melissa McMahill, Todd Saunders, Jeff Marr, Mike Hardin and Mark Zambreno. Along with die students in the glee club, probably the only normal people in the whole play, are a number of unusual adults played by Tim Courteau, Jason Brainard, Kristin Richard and Liz Scalf. Reserved seat tickets »o this night of laughs are irow on sale in the high school pi il’s office. They may be rested by calling 473-5472 but must be picked up by 3 pm prior to the evening’s performance. Remaining tickets wUI be on sale at the door each evening. Senior citizens and district pass holders may pick up free tickets to the opening night performance April 13. That is the only night that passes wiU be honored. Tickets are $3 each. MTlementanj^ T’air (Orono (Primary andScfiumann PJementary) nUt Tragic TQngdom of Art iviCC 6e fte(t£ on n^uesrCay, April 2$, 6 • 8 pm (note date efiange) in the Schumann ^Elementary gynu nJhis vM include art luorhjrom all grades 1 *3 and ungraded students in the (Gstrict. Along zoith viewing the yearly art worh. By students there will Be an ice cream social, demonstrators of arts and crafts, and some spectacular surprises for all ages! IPCease put tfiis date on your cxiCendar andptan to join us. /-•------------ H*.^’ ~;~-v r.~---Xli&..■.Tr_:r..-^r.'.^ -.-.. --------;-■•• •■ • —- K SA+^m:/ toe 10 #lfe’i&^sSlion DeidUne^^ 12^: l ?ww3fti'i» 4»\¥mi i... - •’■-----!s----j==s=^====S^SSSSSSn 9S£S9Sr4; . ■mmw.fra;<SE*5 - ■ ^ • »T , .* :••' . >; -‘-■'^ ,n u T.; ■•■■> ini ■, d l--^ ^AXlstrcnglyAgree •V-;- "-Agree - ‘ ' '?D^-'-'' DUagree-'^'’ •'•-■-.^«“=‘"*f'''-?’!^'r SD ■ Strongly Disagree-"*' '■••;- -fr SA A~ ■ D = '!>- - ■''* In'the Orono Schools, overall I feel I received 60.8 r 39.2 ,.' 0.0; • ;?;/> .riv. ■ .^^ : ,- 3 ^ .•■_.•> -..-. ' ■ ' -■ • • • •*-•■ •— ■ 'i 2^:'i: ■ Overall, attCTding Orono High School was .:IU. .................................. 39^^149.0 V 7.8 ■ . -r' ‘3.46.0 38.0 4^^ 12.0 - an enjoyable experience. ^£f S;f;:;:v-..:'^t-;''.*;>^- •> ■%:':■> s,.e:j< e l iu.^ >-; ■ ; -X '■ - ' V j fgg| Orono High School prepared me well for my post-high school education. 4. 1 feel attendance and discipline were stressed 40.0 54.0 4.0 SD Vi 0.0 ■S .i 4;/?, 3.9, . . , v“T »# ^mj.: W'T ■- '■' •.:/•• M xynw-tV*"* .«• -V ■•V ■:? ■ .- : •. f .. ^ ■:* ;l.. ETHNIC DANCE THEATRE TO PERFORM •; The Ethnic Dance Theatre will turn the stage into a world of dance, music, and song when they appear in concert on Saturday, April 22, 7 pm, at the Wayzata High School Auditorium. The Arts Advisory Commission of Orono, Plymouth, and Wayzata are sponsoring this program. This activity is made possible by funds provided by the - Metropolitan Council/Regional Arts Council from an appropriation by the Minnesota State Legislature. The Twin Cities based company of 26 costumed dancers, " singers and musicians will feature a playful suite of dances ". from the Ojxiczno region of Poland, with the men and L women competing for one another's attentions. . Original folk instruments, many collected from around the world, are played by the company’s folk orchestra, and singers perform melodies in Rumanian, Russian, and Bulgarian. .' * The whirlwind dance tour also stops in Egypt, Russia, Armenia, Greek/Macodina and Yugoslavia. The Ethnic Dance Theatre was founded in 1974 by Jonathan Frey and Donald LaCourse. Since then, the troupe has earned a national reputation for authenticity and excellence in ethnic dance and music. Each year the ensemble performs new pieces taught by choreographers from around the globe. The company entertains audiences as well as preserves the heritage of many cultures. For further information and tickets, please contact Plymouth Park and Recreation, Wayzata Community Education, Orono Community Education or Schumann Elementary School. Tickets in advance are $3 for youth and seniors, $5 for adults. Tickets at the door will be $4 and $7. Ungraded Alternative On Monday evening, April 10, parents of present kindeigarten students plus any other interested parents, are invited to attend a meeting in the Ungraded area at Schumann Elementary School. This will be m infonnational meeting to acquaint you with this alternative program. A sign-up sheet will come home with students on Wbdnesday, April 5, and any parents interested in their child being a part of the Ungraded area for grades 1-3 should return the form to the Schumann Elementary office by Thursday, April 13. The meeting will begin at 7:00 pm. V/e invite you to join us. Marvel Bongart, Principal Schumann Elementary School Winter Cnrnit^ai - 1989 Tlanxf tfianfes to tfie parents and teachers who contributed tfielr time and efforts to make. this gear’s Winter Camiooi a hu9e success. Also, a specioi thonit x^ou to the principals, narvei Bon^nrt and Ron aUbert, who oversaw the events, the coohs and custodions for their preparations, the voCunteer /iremen and local businesses who mode generous donations. We appreciate gour support. Carnival Chairmen, Jim & Jochg •Anderson Randal & Nancg Sober Senior All Night Party The Parents of the 1989 Graduating Seniors have been busy planning the All Night Party for the students who will be graduating on June 8th. Committees have been meeting on a regular basis to make sure that this will be a wonderful evening of entertainment and fun. The party will follow the June 8th graduation ceremony and reception. The party will be our seniors’ last time together, and we want to make this a safe evening. Seniors will be transported to the site after the reception and will be returned to the Orono parking lot at 5:00 a.m., June 9th. The cost of the evening is $50 per student for the entire evening. If there is a financial problem and the $50 is an obstacle to a senior attending, please let us know. We want every senior to feel welcome to attend. These names will be held in strictest confidence. Call Ardith Maki at 473- 1472 or Merle Stiles at Orono Senior High, 473-5472. If you are someone who wants to donate a gift, or if you know someone w'ho would enjoy providing a gift for that night, contact Lyn Watson at 479-2282 or Barb Dugan at 479-2849. The Seniors need to have their p>ermission slip and money in by April 15th. This may be sent to: Sharon Mechavich, 2108 Neilson, Long Lake, MN 55356. Don't miss out on the fun! Host Homes Needed for Amity Scholar The High School Spanish department is looking for two additional sponsoring homes for the Amity Aide for a third each of the 1989-90 school year. This is a Department of State approved program designed to introduce young adults (age 21-27) from other countries to United States culture and education in a supervised teaching experience. While improving their English and teaching methods the Amity Scholar teaches the advanced placement group and leads conversation groups of Spanish III and IV. In the sponsoring homes they are expected to fulfill the role of a good adult member of the family. For further information please call the High School office 473-5472. Barbara Jacoby, Spanish teacher a A. .MiiiB l '' V '■' Jason Butterfield Jason Butterfield, seventh grade Pee-Wee, Orono Hockty player standout, achieved individual hockey skill recognition in winning his second. First Place finish in the Minnesota Northstar/Maxwell House Skate, Shoot and Score compjetilion. He achieved First Place finish both as a ten year old and now as a twelve year old. Participants were state wide and tested by Minnesota Northstar representatives for skating and shooting ability. Final competition was viewed by Northstar fans during the Northstar versus E>etroit game’s intermission on March 7,1989. Lions Donate to Schools These are accurateThe Maple Plain Lions Club has donated to the Orono School District three Glucometers instruments that measure blood glucose levels in the blood. It is used to help diabetics understand their blood sugar changes and the effect that diet, exercise and daily living have on their level of control. Peg Hokanson, of Maple Plain, was instrumental in obtaining these machines for the school district. The use of these instruments will be made available to children who an.* diabetic in the school district. A most sincere thank you to the Lions Club for their generous donatioa JoAnn Ree, Orono District Nurse. . ; : . .• i ■•>«•»%« f ^Nate Miller in‘-^' ^ ^e Wrestling Tournament Early Childhood Health and Developmental Screening ■Tr f 1 Congratularions to Orono wrestler Nate Miller. Nate State Wrestling Tournament held . Ifebruaiy 23, 24, 25 by placing second in the Fegion oAA Toujman\OTL; While at the Sfite Meet, Nate placed 6th at ;;|135 pounds. In the second round he defeated the #1 rated ■jVgystler Jbm IX)ane of St F^ds 7-6, who at the time had j 4 a of 29-0l!t Nate lost a very dose senrd-final match: I f again^ Blake/Bfwk ’s Brian Koppa 4-3.; Nate becomes ■ ^ Orono’s. 25th wrestler, to represent us iii the State 4^urnament and our 7th person to place.'i% ^7 EQUIPMENT SALE INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY " DEPX ^.................................................................................................................................: ■ . ................................................. LOCATION-TECHNOLOGY LABS 2.(NORTH DRIVEWAY OF THE HIGH. :/ .. SCHOOL) SIGNS WILL SHOW LOCATION - • ai 4 »' ill r--1 MONDAY, APRIL lOTH, 2:00-8:00 P.M. TUESDAY, APRIL IITH, 2:00- 8:00P.M. SALE ITEMS' ELECTRIC TYPEWRITERS, COMPUTER, OFFSET PRESS, POWER PAPER CUTTER, SEMI AUTO - SCREEN PRINTER, DRILL PRESS, TABLE SAW, WOOD JOINTER, JIG SAW, ARC WELDERS, METAL LATHES, MILLING MACHINE AND TOOL GRINDER. ‘ MANY-MANY HAND TOOLS- SAWS, PLANES, SANDERS AND OTHER ITEMS TOO MANY TO LIST> COME LOOK IF QUESTIONS: Call DAVE SOHN- 473-5472 EXT 240 OR BRUCE FRAHM- 473-7301 EXT 281 Early Childhcxxl Health and Developmental Screening was held the week of Februaiy 13th at the C>rono Primary in Maple Plain. One hundred and thirty’eight children partidpaled in the screening program.- The assessment completed on the children included health history, immunizations, physical growth, dental inspection, hearing and vision. . • J... j f*‘- A developmental screening test which assessed the child's development in the areas of fine and gross motor skills, speech and language, sodal-emotional behavior and self-help skills was also completed on the children. ^ The screening was conducted by the Orono educators, health professionals and trained volunteers. . We want to thank the parents for bringing their children to the screening. The purpose of the screening is to identify children with significant delays in development which may be educationally handicapping JoAnn Ree Orono District Nurse .t... Orono Wrestling The Orono Wrestling Team held their Awards Banquet on Tliesday, March Nth. They finished the season with a conference record of 5-3. Receiving special honors at the banquet were: Fastest fall: 13 Ryan Miller Most Falls; 11 Steve Tonsberg Most take downs: 65 Matt Lajoy Most Valuable: Matt Lajoy All Conference; Dustin Nadeau Matt Lajoy All Conference Honorable Mention: Mike Hillstrom Co-Captains 88-89: Nate Miller, Matt Lajoy All State: Nate Miller Pop Concert Thursday and Friday, April 27 and 28 are the dates for this year's annual BAND POP CONCERT. Featured will be music, dances and skits to fit everyone's tastes. Orono Alumni Kevin Mills and Bruce Balgaard will also be there with their fantastic group. It promises to be an exciting event Tickets are $3; reserved through the H.S. office or purchased at the door. »*»y» II. I ii«i^nimiii>iirg II., 11 »i> ^wfci ■ ■ . '-i.'' ".' '. . 52S^£^2ir: Activity Calendar %*/3 t Classes ns^ t ^ ^ v , ^VUTfeacte Workshop - NO SCHOOL^ 4|4/24t Board Mating, MSA/bcal Music Room ,. 7KX) ^HiSSilaaAirti^ ElOTi July RD. Party-r£K- i^SSsSSSS^S ^4/10. Mwtinig regarding Unloaded, ungraded area Z: 7KX) “4/11?Hem/IS PTA Exec Board Meeting at . r.. 7:15 f 4/13 Cheepskate- PTA Family Fun Night ;V: '.6KX) f 4/16*Primary & Hem. April B.D. Party-. ^ »■ ^4/25 Hem: Art Fair Ice OW» Social ::v:v. :. 6KX) V Intermediatg/Middl# School Activiri»<t ‘;. •'* •. 4/54 lSRewaidDay:i r 4/16 iSPACMeeHng: . ::t^:V7;:vV.7:l5 4/11 Elem/IS PTA Exec. Board Meeting at IS ............7:15 4/18 MS PAG Meeting.................................. 730 High Srf^oi Acriviries ; y r: ^4/3 State Math Contest — r . 4/6;, Track-Hei«................... ,,^...^...4:00 4/ir Tennis - Bi^‘- Here .............................. .^. Am Baseball - St Berrmrd’s - Here................;.... Am A/12. Softball at Farmington'............4:00 4/13 Spring Play - Auditorium.................................7:30 " Termis at Blake................................... 4:00 Track at Farmington.........................................4:00 Baseball - St Agnes - Here................................4:00 Girls Golf - Watertown - Here..........................3:00 4/14 Spring Play - Auditorium .............................730 Softball - Centennial - Here...............................4:00 4/15 Spring Play - Auditorium..................................730 4/17 Softball at Breck................................................4:00 Boys Golf-DeLaSalle-Here.............................4:00 Baseball at Centennial......................................4.*00 Tennis-Here.....................................................4KX) 4/18 Vocal Solos & Ensembles at Armstrong.............3:00 TVack - Shakopee - Here....................................4:00 Girls Golf - Mound - Here................................3:00 4/19 Softball - St Anthony - Here.............................4:00 _ .. Boys Golf at St. Anthony:... r...:.. 4:00 ■' fv - ' Baseball at Minnehaha ...................'..------ .4:00 4/20 Tennis at Brooklyn Center................................4:00 . .. Girls Golf at Minnehaha............................ 4:00 Boys Golf at Breck..............................................4:00 '4/21 Softball-Blake-Here....................................4KX) Track-Here----........4:00 .. _ Boys Golf at St Bernards ..................... .4:00 Baseball - Brooklyn Center - Here .......... 4:00 4/22 Tennis- Here...................... 4:00 4/24 Termis - Farmington - Here .................. 4:00 Softball at Mahtomedi.....................................4.-00 Boys Golf at Mound..........................................4.*00 4/25 Baseball at Breck...............................................4:00 Girls Golf - Blake - Here....................................4:00 Board Rcviexv Regular Meeting of February 13,1989 / ■ . Approved Terri Lambert’s request for a maternity ' ’ :/‘disability leaveto ’corrirnenoer- April 3,1989 for ^ /iW leniainder of the 1988-89 schc ’ear.v • - •^Accepted the resigruition of Raymond Beritz, highifCwi ;^g^ool ^todiin, effective June 30,1989. ;<r>^: V? Accept^ the resignation of Pauline Nadeau, n ldle;X»*^,: F- school cashiers effective I^uary 27,1989. v?: • • Approved the appointnrvent of Marsha Noll as middle v-i;, school cashier begirming January 30,1989. ‘-i' “ • ; Approved the resolution establi^ing the boundaries of election precincts, designating polling places and • A ■ appointing election judges.^ / ^ 'V* 1 T • t. Appro^^ the resolution calling for an election on j General Obligation School Building Bonds. • Approved the motion to appoint Mrs. Marge Gasch ■ ' and Mrs. Evy Zacher to assist the clerk in preparing for and running the March 21,1989 referendum election. • * Approved the resolutions establishing dates for filing affidavits of candidacy and filirig dates for election the School Board ' i. • Approved June 12-29,1989 as the dates for the • operation of the 1989 summer school program. , , i • ' Approved the recommended guidelines for the development of a school day schedule presented by the School Day Schedule Task Force. • Approved the motion establishing the salaries for election judges at $5 per hour. • Authorized administration 10 seek bids and replace the gymnasium floor at the Orono Primary School. Regular Meeting of February 27,1989 • Approved Todd Saunders, grade 12 and Erik Saunders, grade 9, to attend Hopkins School District............... Activity Calendar ConL - % . 4/26 Tennis at DeLaSalle .................• 4KX) SoftbaU at DeLaSalle .................................. • -4:00 Boys Golf - Conference ' DECA National Conference (26-30) 4/27 Pop Concert (27 & 28) Auditorium...................7:30 Track at Minnehaha............................................4.-00 Baseball - DeUSalle - Here.................................4.^ Girls Golf - Farmington - Here.............................4:00 4/28 Tennis - Minnehaha - Here................................4:00 4/28 Softball - Brooklyn Center - Here......................4:00 Boys Golf at St. Agnes .........................................4:00 4/29 Baseball at Dassel.............................................10:00 Softball at Dassel...............................................10:00 Tennis - Here.......................................................4:00 School Board Election - May 16 May 15 Last day to apply for absentee ballot May 16 Annual School Board ELECTION DAY Polling Places: Orono Primary School 7 am - 8 pm Schumann Elementary School 7 am - 8 pm Candidate Qualifications: 1. 21 or more years of age at beginning of the term of office. 2. A citizen of the United States. 3. A resident of the school district for 30 days previous to the election Orono Gymnasts Complete Season On Monday; February 27th, the Orono gymnastics team held their annual awards banquet at the Eden Prairie Vo Tech Gourmet Dining Room. Particip)ants earning awards in gymnastics this year were: Sarah V'aliton, Hilary Rose, Martha Young-Manager, Greer Vogt, Joanne Kunz and Jenny Strand. Gymnasts earning letters this year were: 1st letter. Robyn Forsythe, Katie Carlson, Jodie Heyerdahl, Kim King- Manager, and Sarah Brown. 2nd letter: Chiara Wood, Kelly Hart, Erin King. 3rd letter: Rachel Fulkerson, Gretchen Craven. 4th letter: Sarah Levering. Captains Rachel Fulkerson and Sarah Levering gave out Captains awards to each gymnast. Many school record certificates were awarded. Both the J.V. and Varsity Squads broke many records this year. The Varsity team school record is now 136.95. The new Varsity school record in vaulting is 34.65, on Bars, 34.2 and on Beam 33.65. The J.V. school records include a new team score record of 118.8 as well as Bars at 29.7 and Floor at 32.2. Named to the All-Conference squad this year were Sarah Levering and Gretchen Craven. Honorable mention All- Conference awards were presented to Jodie Heyerdahl, Sarah Brown, Erin King and Rachel Fulkerson. Region 6AA finalists, Sarah Levering, Sarah Brown and Gretchen Craven were recognized. Coach Connie Priesz reminisced about how far the Orono team has come in the past 10 years. "These girls have broken records and surpassed many of their goals. They have been fun to work with and I’m proud of every one of them." The Orono team voted Senior Sarah Levering as the Most Valuable Player. She also received her Senior award. Sarah was also congratulated for earning the school's Athena Award this year. Coach Priesz looked to the future with high hopes. The team moves to Qass A (small school) competition next year and hopes to do well in Regional and State competition. ' All gymnasts received a team booklet and team award for their participation in the sport of gymnastics. Captains for next year were named. They are Erin King, Gretchen Craven and Rachel Fulkerson. The nights activities were concluded with a slide show presented by Captains Rachel Fulkerson and Sarah Levering. Special awards voted on by the team members were: Perfect attendance: Erin King, Sarah Brown, Gretchen Craven Rookie of the yean Sarah Brown Sportsmanship: Rachel Fulkerson Most improved: Lindsey Underdahl, Sarah Valilon Hardest Worker Gretchen Craven, Hilary Rose Best Attitude: Erin King Most helpful: Kim King Best Beam Sticker Jodie Heyerdahl Band Date Changed The nev/ dale for BEGINNING BAND REGISTRATION is Thursday, May 18, Please mark your calendars. Further information will be included in the May Newsletter. B NEWSLETTER AOMIMISnUTION OFFICI MS OLD CnrtTAt. BAT MOAO NOItTH LOMO LAKI. MINNttOTA SUM i» 0*9. U % POilACt PAID long lo4t. Mn. NO 17 City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay MN 553B3 Ehlers and As»Jnc. LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE NEWSLETTER A BI MONTHLY PUBLICATION OFFICtS IN MINNFAPOLIS AND vVAUKESHA VQLL?M£.34jmiB£R 2 FILE: Financial Specialists: Ehlers and Associates, Inc. Please distnbute to governing body members MAJR.CH.m9 NORWJBSTJCENTERlffiWJdQMEXOHHLERS After 25 years in the Soo Line Building, we have now transferred operations to the new Norwest Center in downtown Miiuieapolis. Elders and Associates, Inc. 2950 Norwest Center 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-4100 SaiTie phone number (612) 3.T9-8291, same super staff rendering s»-j^ir service in financing conununity improvements. Come see our new home. LOSS QE.TAX EXEMPTION WOULD COST MORE Look for biture attempts to further diminish tax exemption of state and local borrowings following North Carolina vs. Baker. Loss of tax exemption will raise borrowing costs by at least 35%, and local govenunents should hold Congress accountable for those higher costs if it taxes your borrowings. At the same time, state and U>cal governments must guard against re-inflation of the tax-exempt bond supply lest the interest rate advantage be frittered away on non-governmental public financings. The law is chaotic and causes higher borrowing costs to you and your taxpayers. Some bonds are subject to an alternative minimum tax (AMT), some aren’t. Some qualify for deductibility from corporate income, some don’t. Investors are confu.sed, and you suffer higher interest rates. It is important to contact your congressmen and senators to make sure they understand the importance. While you are at it call attention to the outlandish practice of the Treasury Department and legislators of putting retroactive lates in tax bills which have the effect of law even if never heard by conunittee. A congressman can role the country by putting an effective date in a bill! Ajid it costs borrowers a bundle. LEASE PURCH VSE AGREEMENTS CAN RP.S01V E POLITICAL PROBLEMS Leasing can convert potential political issues mto sound, non-controversial business decisions. If a county needs a new jail/law enforcement center, without which it cannot hold prisoners, it can lease just as it leases other equipment and end up owning it. 'Fliose who have used leases experience little, if any, public comment. Moreover, lease transactions are straightforward, and the financing can be offered competitively. Les.sees are not lijnited to private, non-competitive transactions. They can even create their own non-profit authorities to build, finance and lease back the facilities, thereby saving leasing company charges. Generally leases, especially those subject to annual appropriation, are not considered debt. However, the New Mexico Supreme Court recently decided otherwise. Some states, Minnesota and North Ditkota, have expressly bicsseil leasing. ?960 Notwesl Center • 90 South Seventh Street • Minneapolis MN 5S402 4100 • 61P-.139 8.?91 • FAX fit? .119 0aS4 DISCLOSURE GUlDEiJNRS MAY RP^SIJLT IN INCREASED COSTS Some movement is afoot to force state aiul local borrowers into an SEC-type disclosure even absent any pattern of fraud or abuse (by local governments), even though disclosure has been the prunary function of bond underwriters. If it comes, expect higher issuance costs and delays. Should a community negotiate its borrowings privately? Only as a la.st resort. In private deals an underwriter’s margins are nearly double, and the coupon interest rates are about 1% higher than public, competitive sales. On a million dollar, twenty-year issue that’s about $I80,0(K). Regular clients of bond dealers are investors whose appetite for high yields exactly conflicts with borrowers’ desire for low interest rates. EHIJRS 5SIIPPORT .^TfAFF AT YOUR FINGERTIPS In our last letter I mentioned that our success was tied to our super account executives, people who you see at meetings. But behind them, and without whom none of us could be nearly as effective, are a knowledgeable support staff which makes things happen. Jana Ristamaki heads our operations with the assistance of Nancy DeMarais, Debra Knieste (investment of funds), Nancy Liss, Diana Lockard, Sandra Ludford, Katherine Nesgoda. Sue Feterson, and Christine Smith in Minneapolis, plus Darlene Bahr in Waukesha. Phil Chenoweth and Dan Boyce keep the new computer system functioning at top efficiency. We should tell you how to use us. If your account executive is not in, ask for her or his assistant. If the assistant knows the answer, you'll have it. If not, someone will return your call. Oir aim is to satisfy your requests as soon as possible by whoever is available and knows the answers. In some cases we’ll kriow outside people, such as attorneys, who we can access on a conference call. Of course the message will he given to the account executive for review. If you need a computer run, say the annual debt service on a bond issue, ask for Phil or Dan if your account people aren’t available. We’ll quickly get back to you. We will us2l leave you dangling. Often those with financing problems think of us when they are ready to vote on or to sell bonds which is fine; we U start anytime. But sofue of our best work is in early fiscal planning, to guard against serious problems such as failure to size the bond issue adequately. It is enibarrassmg to the governing body to not be able to finish a building properly or to experience an extra levy in the first year because someone forgot to include capitalized interest during construction, or issuance costs, or a bond discount. We are anxious to serve you. Very truly yours, Robert L. Elders We look forward to seeing you at: MINJNESPJARURMcWATBR.ASiiQaAnQN - March 7-9 K)WAj^SS(X:iAJlQIlMUJ^iaPAlj;jUII^ - March 12-14 WlSCa^lMASSQOATlDfLQJiSCHOQL DISTRICT ADMINI.STR ATDRS .. May 1.3 SUHHARY OF AREA BOND SALES Municipalitv Date Type of Bonds ^unt tliiurily N«t Ritt Bond Boyar IndtK luting l9»i Iowa Board of Regents Oes Hoines Area CoMMunity College Cedar Falls Farley Newton Newton Nechanicsvl1le Aiaes West Oes Hoines Comr. $/D Algona Algona 12/12/88 Utility Systeai Revenue Bonds S20,700H 1990-2013 7.08%7.68%A) 12/13/88 New Jobs Training Certificates 2,450N 1990-1998 7.28%7.68%Aa 12/14/88 G.O.laproveaient Bonds 3,175H 1990-2002 6.98%7.68%Al 12/19/88 G.O.Corporate Purpose Bonds 180H 1989-1998 6.86%7.66%NR 12/19/88 G.O.Taxable Bonds 2,000H 1994-2004 9.62%7.66%Al 12/19/88 G.O.Bonds l,175M 1994-2004 7.05%7.66%Al 01/09/89 GO.Sewer tmprove*>ent Bonds 13SH 1990-1999 7.06%7.44%NR 01/10/89 G.O.Sewer Improvewent Bonds 3,900N 1990-2004 6.99%7.44%Aal 01/11/89 G.O.School Bonds 4,700N 1991-2000 6.72%7.44%Aa 01/30/89 G.O.Bonds, Series A 120N 1991-1994 6.53%7.27%A 01/30/89 G.O.Bonds, Series B 810H 1990-2000 6.67%7.27%A HinQU.0.U Blooming Prairie 12/01/88 G.O. Grant Anticipation Bonds 2,020M 1991 6.78%7.58%NR Blaine 12/01/88 G.O. Tax Increment Bonds 1.755M 1990-2005 6.92%7.58%A jiaine 12/01/88 G.O. Improvement Bonds 2.400H 1991-2000 6.68%7.58%A Shoreview 12/05/88 G.O. Improvement Bonds 320M 1990-1999 6.85%7.66%Al Shoreview 12/05/88 G.O. Equipment Bonds 565H 1990-1993 6.53%7.66%Al Shoreview 12/05/88 G.O. Park Bonds 605H 1990-1993 6.53%7.66%Al I.S.O. *15 (St. Francis)12/05/88 G.O. School Building Bonds 13,750H 1991-2010 7.65% 7.66%Aaa/AAA Albertville 12/05/88 G.O. Advanced Ref. Imp. Bonds 505H 1989-2000 7.23%7.66%NR Stevens County 12/06/88 G.O. Solid Waste Facilities Revenue Bonds 250M 1990-1996 6.88%7.66%Baal I.S.O. #701 (Nibbing)12/07/88 G.O. School Building Bonds 4,480H 1990-2001 7.46%7.66%Baa I.S.O. #701 (Nibbing)12/07/88 G.O. School Building Bonds 1,020N 1990-2001 7.48%7.66%Baa Benson 12/08/88 G.O. Mater t Sewer Revenue Bonds 560H 1990-2004 7.34%7.66%Baa Banson 12/08/88 G.O. Tax Increment Bonds 345M 1990-2009 7.52%7.66%Baa Benson 12/08/88 G.O. Water A Sewer Revenue Bonds 150H 1994-2004 7.37%7.66%Baa I.S.O. #659 (Norlhfield)12/12/88 G.O. School Building Bonds 2.035H 1992-2004 7.00%7.68%A Warroad 12/12/88 GO. Grant Anticipation Bonds 1.520H 1990 6.80%7.68%NR Warroad 12/12/88 G.O. Loan Anticipation Bonds 245H 1989 6.79%7.68%NR Bloomington 12/12/88 Permanent Imp. Revolving Bonds 2,690M 1990-2008 6.77%7.68%Aa Bloomington 12/12/88 G.O. Storm Water Bonds 2.590M 1990-2006 7.04%7.68%Aa New Mope 12/12/88 G.O. Improvement Bonds 1,600H 1991-2005 7.07%7.68%Al I.S.O. #504 12/12/88 G.O. Tax Anticioation Certificates of Indebtedness 620M 1990 6.80%7.68%NR Faribault 12/13/8b G.O. Corporate Purpose Bonds 595K 1990-2004 7.08%7.68%Al Faribault 12/13/88 G.O. Tax Increment Bonds 460M 1990-2004 7.07%7.68%Al Chisago County 12/13/88 Lease Revenue Bonds 3.390H 1991-2005 7.18%7.68%Aaa/AAA Champiin 12/13/88 G.O. Refunding Bonds 1.660H 1990-1999 7.02%7.68%Baal I.S.O. #423 (Hutchinson)12/13/88 G.O. School BuiIding Bonds 2.750H 1991-2005 7.18%7.68%A Cden Prairie 12/13/88 G.O. Improvement Bonds 9, BOOM 1990-2004 7.00%7.68%Aaa/AAA I.S.O. #742 (St. Cloud) 12/14/88 G.O. School Building Bonds 25.200H 1993-2010 7.39%7.60%A Braham 12/14/88 Water A Sewer Revenue Bonds I60H 1991-2005 7.46%7.68%NR South St. Paul 12/19/88 G.O. Capital Notes 2B0H 1990 6.82%7.66%NR Proctor 12/19 «8 G.O. Tax Antic. Certs, of Indebt.290M 1990 6.75%7.66%NR Crookston 12/27/88 G.O. Grant Anticipation Notes BOOH 1990 6.83%7.57%NR Shoreview 01/0.3/89 G.O. Tax Incretwnt Bonds 6.250H 1992-2011 7.28%7.50%Al Shoreview 01/03/89 G.O. Water Revenue Bonds I,I50H 1990-1999 6.91%7.50%Al I.S.O. #200 Hastings 01/04/89 G.O. Tax Antic. Certs, of Indebt.2,970H 1990 6.58%7.50%NR Amboy 01/09/89 G.O. Grant Anticipation Bonds 800H 1991 7.03%7.44%NR I.S.O. #196 Rosemnunt/Apple Valley 01/09/89 G.O. School Building Bonds 16.370M 19.2-2002 7.24%7.44%A NunlclMlItv Date I.s o.01/09, White Bear take Norwood 01/09/89 Sp. School District #l 01/10/89 Minneapolis l.S.O. #194 Lakeville 01/10/89 Oodge Center 01/10/89 Dodge Center 01/10/89 l.S.O. #549 Perha«/Dent Ot/ll/89 l.S.O. #829 Waseca 01/12/89 l.S.O. #829 Waseca 01/12/89 Cannon Falls 01/17/89 Cannon Falls 01/17/89 l.S.O. #12 Centennial 01/17/89 l.S.O. #719 01/17/89 l.S.O. #812 Hahtomedl 01/17/89 l.S.O. #446 Warren 01/16/89 Gaylord 01/18/89 Gaylord 01/18/89 l.S.O. #284 Wayzata 01/23/89 Buffalo Lake 01/23/89 l.S.O. #506 St. Peter 01/23/89 l.S.O. #720 Shakopee 01/23/89 Cottonwood 01/24/89 Eden Valley 01/26/89 l.S.O. #141 01/2L/89 Chisago Lakes Wheaton 01/26/89 Wheaton 01/26/89 Oent 01/27/89 l.S.O. #564 01/30/89 Thief River Falls l.S.O. #564 01/30/89 Thief River Falls Wisconsin Green Bay PSD 12/05/88 Marshfield 12/13/88 Susse*12/20/88 Green Bay 12/20/88 Green Bay 12/20/88 Rice Lake Area S/0 01/09/89 Oelavan 01/17/89 Type of Bonds G.O. Tax AnHc. Carts, of Indobt. G.O. Water Bonds G.O. Ta* AntU»pat<on CerUfUates G.O. School Building Bonds G.O. Grant Anticipation Bonds G.O. Sewer Revenue Bonds G.O. School Building Bonds G.O. School Building Bonds G.O. Tan Antic. Certs. G.O. Ta* Incre«.ent Bonds, A G.O. Ta* Increment Bonds, B G.O. Ta* Anticipation Certificates G.O. Ta* Antic. Certs, of Indebt. G.O. School Building Bonds G.O. Ta* Anticipation Certificates G.O. Ta* Incre««nt Bonds G.O. Water A Sewer Revenue Bonds G.O. School Building Bonds G.O. Refunding Inproveeient Bonds G.O. Ta* Anticipation Certificates G.O. Ta* Anticipation Certificates G.O. Refunding Bonds G.O. Refunding Bonds G.O. Ta* Anticipation Certificates G.O. Sewer Revenue Bonds G.O. Grant Anticipation Bonds G.O. Refunding Bonds G.O. Ta* Antic. Certs, of Indebt. G.O. School Building Bonds G.O. Proeilssory Notes G.O. Proetlssory Notes Water Syste« Mortgage Revenue Bonds G.O. Corporate Purpose Bonds Taxable G.O. Bonds G.O. Improveeient Bonds G.O Promissory Notes Aawunt Haturltv Net Bond Buyer Inilta RALicg S,000M 1990 6.85X 7.44*NR 320M 1990-1999 7.12*7.44*NR 30,DOOM 1990 6.47*7.44*MIG 2 l,670M 1993-2002 7.03*7.44*A 390M 1991 6.68*7.44*NR l,035M 1992-2009 7.31*7.44*Baa 1,995M 1991-2005 7.16*7 44*Baa 1,730M 1994-2005 7.05*7.44*A 1,470N 1990 6.73*7.44*A 315M 1989-2001 6.98*7.40*Baal 385M 1989-2001 6.98*7.40*Baal 2.225M 1990 6.75*7.40*NR 1,790M 1990 6.66*7.40*NR 7.075M 1990-2008 7.08*7.40*Aaa/AAA 600M 1990 6.74*7.40*NR 600M 1991-2009 7.06*7.40*Baa 825M 1991-2010 7.09*7.40*Baa 12,970M 1995-2009 7.07* 7.29* Al 505M 1990-2006 7.13*7.29*NR l,250M 1990 6.55*7.29*NR l,9.35M 1990 6.68*7.29*NR 150M 1990-2006 7.21*7.29*NR 200M 1990-200O 7.21*7.29*NR 970M 1990 6.69*7.29*NR 380M 1990-2009 7.15*7.29*Baal 215M 1991 6.62*7.29*NR 85M 1990-2001 7.38*7.27*NR 1,275M 1990 6.68*7.27*NR 300M 1991-2005 7.05*7.27*Baa 4, BOOM 1990-1998 6.85*7.66*Aa 1,775M 1990-1998 6.68*7.68*Aa l,065M 1990-2004 7.61*7.66*Baa 3.650M 1990-2008 7.27*7.66*Aa 68SM 2002-2003 9.33*7.66*Aa 1,280M 1990-2003 7.11*7.44*A I.525M 1991-1999 7.02*7.40*Baal fl m ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT Witness Statement Date ~ ^^_____Time ' ^Page_________of______________ Name V^T^^^yT/jG ________Birthdate ^/9>Aae Marital St^t\is^7^'l'LL€^^ Address Phone ^33. ^____Etr.plcyed at C^J'C . I make the following free and voluntary statement to Officer (s)____ who have identified themselves to me as Officers of the Orono Police Department. Details ; 0/iZl^y2Jd J,yy> J £3>t..a.^%-€yCr:> .^Or>a^ s,J^ T Joyy^" J ^^ I rU'U..A/'C^ UJCL o *jfYLo>'n^ C0^i><jLJCi‘^L/(^ 1 (^yL*^yt -• fylc^ yyi4%^ Jcc.^ ^ ixXjU n^^JL ’■'TO luuijb Zo jC^ O Cijuc^cP ^IcriUt^v^y uJ ol& x AxT ^fi .yyi.^^ Co ^jLk, L*J^ UJCi^»Jju£ ^2// ^ .ytc/Ttn yX~).><}jQ,<^/cO ^ tiJSl^Ji.^^ Oi^y^f'f^u.'k') ,yyiA>CA^ Co ^ ^0^-Cct^t^yh^.A^, S i on at ure yCj/lO ^i^T'fT^O.^riJ^^ yU^^ G CpUa^ ^ ISU. a ii^' j-»^y . Witness: V.'i f r.e.ss : ^ ; V< ;(• irn '5i ! I»‘ '*■';n •• ; k • I I i i i IS iiimi / #^jy M / yyi ->o. ... ,*jUi. .-Ct^ “-*^ X-"^tr------ .-rztrt^ ^3 U -T 1. .AJUU^kU^ .„£^vt-c-#UW^ .a>A^ Ci.-y^upJu4 fQ’-^ c^-*->**-*^ ^ c o --W^—^ ^iUc>iu^ r r 4yU<Jt^ 0-^ X4-*-^-*^-t yn t c^)-jlUo'Ca. «■<»< •• ■/:• ■■ .. ■• ... • • *•, • •.* •••. • o 3'^ To* Froa: Date: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members / Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato^^ 4589.4HD April 5, 1989 Subject* Administrator's Information HIGHWAY 12 TASK FORCE - bUNCIL .1 Ah.lO:-"! ;-lTV i)c Commissioner Levine's office has finally been back in contact and a meeting with Commission Levine and members of the Task Force is tentatively set for Thursday, April 27, 1989 at the Orono Schools at 12:30 p.m. Further information will be available prior to your April 24th meeting. PROJECT DARE/OFFICER FRIENDLY - The City has been working over the last several months to Initiate the DARE program in the O^ono schools. At this time, because of teachers workload and scheduling conflicts, it may be difficult to initiate this program yet this spring, although the Police Department is continuing to work with the Principal on the matter. The Chief of Police may be discussing the matter with the Superintendent. The City will continue its Officer Friendly program as noted in the request above. FACILITY SITE ANALYSIS/SOIL BORINGS - The soil borings done on the site at Highway 12 and Old Crystal Bay Road have indicated the soils of concern on the whole site vary from up to 6" to 3' and as a result of that, it is not anticipated that soils will constitute a building problem on that site. As for the sewer plant site, test results are not available as of this date. COUNTY ROAD 15 RIBBON CUTTING - The official opening of the re ’ised County Road 15 is anticipated for Saturday, May 6, 1989. Additional iiformation will be provided regarding this at your April 24th meeting. BOARD OF REVIEW - Just a reminder that the Board of Review will be held on Thursday, May 11, 1989. SPRING MANAGERS' CONFERENCE - I am anticipating attending the Managers' conference from May 10th through the 12th. I will be absent from the Board of Review unless the Council would desire me to stay. The topic of the conference this year v/ill be given by a group of individuals that have been associated with the Menninger foundation and will be discussing issues regarding personal and professional change challenge for the 1990s. Administrator's Information April 5, 1989 Page 2 of 2 NAVARRE RE-DEVELOPMENT - Staff will be meeting with the Planner to review work on the project on April 14, 1989 and will be working to establish a date for the Council presentation subsequent to that. SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS & DISBORSEMENTS - (see attached) January and February ELECTRONICS FUNDS TRANSFER/YTD - (see attached) In accordance with the Financial Investment Policy, this is presented for your information. GRIEVANCE POLICY - As directed at the Council's March 13th meeting, the existing policies have been specially noted to department heads for communiciations to their staffs. GOAL SETTING STATUS - see attached. BBOimtlM 1/1/89 TXntD iwnanapn BALAHCI CA8B BUAHCB 1/1/89 Gaaaral rarka COOS Iqalp Outlay Bldg Cap Ootly Mim 8t Bid Cooa Par lapr Bar lap Bond 68-78 lap Bead 80 lap Bond 82 lap Bond 85 Matar Op 8awar Op Golf Oouraa Op Poolad law Truat Puad 2,981,358 116,402 0 263,161 145,228 3,519 149,081 609,720 ■",565 ,025 ,861 ,523 ,170 0 475, 195, 136, 113. 443, CITY OP OROHO SOHMARY OP RBCBXPT8, DISBORSEMBHTS AND BALANCB6 POR THB MONTH OP JANOARY 1989 RBCBXPT8 TOTAL BODGBT (C) 1989 TRAN8P XM XNVB8T SOLD DX8KOR TOTAL BODQBT (C) 1989 60,493 573 0 873 492 0 28,156 3,691 1,866 1,175 894 599 48,073 142 5,514,024 (5,514,024) 20,508 TOTALS 5,514,024 98,589 167,535 2,620,660 17,000 68,200 129,500 82,800 96,600 15,650 91,150 191,500 463,220 92,190 3,868,470 TOTAL8 L8T YR 5,361,402 56,648 218,922 3,628,170 260,6.72 2,720.660 0 0 0 30 0 2,531 163,430 3 0 652 7,894 32,655 112,530 173,190 121,740 68,360 108,390 174,540 361,240 /nji(i^iK0)r i BNDXNO 1/31/89 « OP TRANSP BODOBT DOT XNVBST PORCH CASH BALAHCB 1/31/69 XHVB8T BALAHCB 9.6% 0.0% 94.4% .0% 0.0% 0.6% 4.5% 9.0% 1,251,834 4,394 101,650 (a) 4.3% 20,508 2,761,049 116,975 0 264,034 145,690 3,5:i 174,706 449,981 477,428 196,200 137,103 106,228 458,568 (4,252) 949,721 (5,211,911) 5,211,911 0 1,251,834 492,899 3,942,500 949,721 75,338 5,211,911 0 1,022,597 440,280 3,624,030 723,000 134,887 5,061,605 OBHBRAL POND SOHMARY - 1989t TOTAL 1989 CASH • INVESTMENT TO 1/31/89 $5,287,249 % OP RBVBHOB BODGBT BODGBT Taxaa 0 :1,378,330 0.0% Lloanaaa i Panalta 11,884 90,000 13.2% Xntargow. Rawanua 0 254,240 0.0% Chga for 8arw 139,009 623,990 22.3% Pioaa 123 95,500 0.1% Xnt. on Xnwaat.20,456 165,000 12.4% Tran. Pr Othar Panda 0 0 Othnr 5,759 13,600 42.3% 177,231 2,620,660 6.8% HOTB (a) Golf operating fond budgat doaa not Includa aaounta for purchaaaa for raaala or aalaa tax collactad/raaittad. Tha racalpta budgat projacta groaa profit - not total racalpta. NOTH (b) Ganaral fund ravanuaa racorded will not aqjal racalpta collactad dua to racaivablaa blllad In othar accounting parloda and non-ravanua racalpta. HOTB (c) Budgat anounta Includa achadulad tranafara, do not Includa fund balance uaaa or addltiona. CITY or ORONO SOMMAIty or RBCXIPT8, DISBtmSBMRNTS AMD BALANCES rOB THE MONTH Or rSBROARY 1989 BiaimmiQ 2/1/89 2/29/89 rOND XMVB8YNBRT BALAMCB CA8B BALANCE 2/1/89 RECEIPTS TOTAL BUDGET (C) 1989 TRAN8P XN XNVEST SOLD GMsral Parks COOB Equip Outlay Bldg Cap Outly Nun St Aid Cous Par Xapr Rau Xap Bond 6S-76 Xap Bond 80 Xap Boad 82 Xap Bond 85 Natar Op 8awar Op Golf Couraa Op Poolad lav Trust Puad 2,761,049 116,975 0 264, 34 145,690 3,519 174,706 449,981 477,428 196,200 137,103 106,228 458,588 (4.252) 129,276 2,163 0 4,887 2,697 0 4,402 9,901 8,904 3,627 6,573 2,249 84,017 (40) 2,620,660 17,000 68,200 129,500 82,800 96,600 650 ISO 500 463,220 92,190 (a) 15 91 191 5,211,911 (5,211,911) 100,983 TOTALS 5,211,911 75,338 359,639 3,868,470 TOTALS LST YR 5,061,805 134,887 199,982 3,628,170 GENERAL POND SUMMARY - 1989r REVENUE BUDGET % OP BUDGET Taras Lleanaaa t Paraits XntargoT. Ravaaua Chgs for Sarr Ploas Xnt. on Xavaat. Traa. Pr Othar Puada Otltar total revenue 0 1.378,330 0.0% 22,420 90,000 24.9% 31,648 254,240 12.4% 145,914 623,990 23.4% 8,722 95,500 9.1% 39,555 165,000 24.0% 0 0 7,790 13,600 57.3% 256,049 2,620.660 9.8% 690,029 DISBUR TOTAL BUDGET (C) 1989 % OP BUDGET TRAN8P OUT INVEST PURCB CASE BALAMCB 2/29/89 285,024 2,720,660 10.5%2,605,301 0 -119,1380-0 6,017 112,530 5.3%262,9040-148,387 0 -3,5191,006 -178,102137173,190 0.1%459,74599,622 121,740 81.8%386,710 59,938 68.360 87.7%139,8890108,390 0.0%143,67614,967 174,540 8.6%93,5108,844 361,240 2.4%533,7615,469 101,850 (a)5.4%(9,761) 100,983 500,286 (5,022,168) XNVEST BALAMCB 0 690,029 582,007 3,942,500 500,286 0 1,049,791 505,214 3,624,030 799,073 42,713 5,022,168 80,373 4,811,087 TOTAL 1989 CASH A XMVB8TNBMT TO 2/29/89 15,064,881 NOTE (a) Golf cparatlng fund budget doaa not inoluda aaouats for purchaaaa for raaala or aalaa tax eollaetad/raaittad. Tha racalpta budget projecta groaa profit - not total racalpta. NOTE (b) General fund revenues lacordad will not equal receipts collected due to receivables billed In other accounting periods and non-revenue receipts. NOTE (c) Budget aaouats include scheduled transfers, do not Include fund balance uses or additions. cm or ORONO SOMMARY or RECEIPTS, DX6B0RSBNBIITS AMD BALANCES FOR THE TWO MONTHS ENDED rSBROARY 29, 1989 EEOINMINO 1/1/89 EHDXMQ 2/29/89 IMVESTMEET EALAHCE CASE BALANCE 1/1/89 RECEIPTS TOTAL BDDGET (C) 1989 TRANSr IN INVEST SOLO DISBOR TOTAL BUDGET (C) 1989 CASH I or TRANSr INVEST BALANCE INVEST BUDGET OUT PORCH 2/29/89 BALANCE 0«i«r«l Parka CDGB Eqalp Outlay Bldg Cap Outly Noa 8t Aid Coaa Par Xapr Bar Xup Boud M-78 Xaip Rood 80 lap Bead 82 Zap Bead 85 Matar Op Bawar Op Golf Cooraa Op 2,9«1,3S8 118,402 0 263,161 145,228 3,519 149,081 609,720 475,565 1S5,025 136,861 U3,523 443,170 0 189,769 2,736 0 5,760 3,189 0 32,558 13,592 10,770 4,802 7,467 2,848 132,090 102 2,620,660 17,000 68,200 129,500 82,800 96,600 15,650 91,150 191,500 463,220 . 92,190 545,826 0 0 6,017 30 0 3,537 163,567 99,625 59,938 652 22,861 41,499 9,863 2,720,660 112,530 173,190 121,740 68,360 108,390 174,540 361,240 101,850 20.1« 5.3» 94.4« 81.8% 87.71 0.6% 13.1% 11.5% 9.7% 2,605,301 119,136 0 262,904 148,387 3,519 178,102 459,745 366,710 139,889 143,676 93,510 533,761 (9,761) Pooled IBV Trust road 5,514,024 (5,514,024)121,491 1,941,663 121,491 1,450,007 (5,022,168)5,022,168 TOTALS 5,514,024 98,589 527,174 3,866,470 0 1,941,863 1,074,906 3,942,500 0 1,450,007 42,713 5,022,168 TOTAL LT YEAR 5,361,402 56,648 418,904 3,626,170 0 2,072,388 945,494 3,624,030 0 1,522,073 60,373 4,811,087 TOTAL 1989 CASH « INVESTMENT TO 2/29/89 $5,064,681 GENERAL POND SDNHARY - 1989i REVENUE BUDGET % OP B'lOGET Tares 0 1,378,330 0.0% Licenses • Paraits 34,304 90,000 38.1% IntargoT. Revenue 31,648 254,240 12.4% Chgs for Serv 284,923 623,990 45.7% Pinas 8,845 95,500 9.3% Xnt. on Invest.60,011 165,000 36.4% Tran. Pr Other Ponds 0 0 Other 13,549 13,600 99.6% TOTAL REVENUE 433,280 (b) 2,620,660 16.5% NOTE (a) Golf oparating fund budget doaa not inoluda aaounta for purchaaao for reaala or aalaa tar collactad/reaittad. Tha racalpta budget projacta groaa profit - not total receipts. NOTE (b) General fund revenues rocorded will not agual receipts oolleotad due to racaivablas billed in other accounting periods and non^revanue receipts. MOTE (c) Budget aaounts include schedules transfers, balance usas or additions. do not Include fund 4589.1 CITY OP ORONO mVBSTKBlIT TRAHSACTIOHS > ELBCTRONIC WIRE TRAHSFBRS JAN. - FEB. - MAR. PATH 01/03/89 01/12/89 01/11/89 01/11/89 01/25/89 02/15/89 02/15/89 02/15/89 02/28/89 03/01/89 03/01/89 03/01/89 03/15/89 03/29/89 03/31/89 TRANSFER FOR Interest due on FNMA Cert of Deposit matured/ prlnc. i Int. Met proceeds from sale of Coma'l Paper after purchase of FNMA repurchase agreement Paper and FNMA repurchase agreement after purchase of Comm'l Paper Interest due on FNMA Strip Coupon from Treas Bond matured Net add'l due for purchase of Comm'l Paper after sale of Comm'l Paper Paper after purchase of Comm'l Paper Interest due on FHLB Interest due on Cert of Deposit Paper after purchase of Comm'l Paper Paper after purchase of Comm'l Paper Net add'l d.'e for purchase of Comm'l Pape.* after sale of Comi Paper Interest due on Certificate of Deposit FROM TO KMOOMT Dain Bosworth 1st Bank Lakes $ 2,137.50 Bear Stearns 1st Bank Lakes 8,375.00 Bear Stearns 1st Bank Lakes 103,750.00 Marquette 1st Bank Lakes 152,000.00 Marquette 1st Bank Lakes 55,483.79 t Bear Stearns 1st Bank Lakes 8,700.00 Dain Bosworth 1st Bank Lakes 420,000.00 1st Bank Lakes Marquette (150,164.311 Marquette 1st Bank Lakes 878.29 Bear Stearns 1st Bank Lakes 11,311.75 Dain Bosworth 1st Bank Lakes 3,900.00 Marquette 1st Bank Lakes 53,051.40 Marquette 1st Bank Lakes 64,977.01 1st Bank Lakes 1 Marquette (48,586.83; Dain Bosworth 1st Bank Lakes 2,352.50 TO: Department Heads FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrate DATE: March 27, 1989 SUBJECT: City Grievance Policy Attachment:A. City Personnel Rules Section 208 B. City Ordinance Section 2.07 As noted in Attachments A and B the City Personnel Rules together with the City Ordinance provide a means by which employees can appropriately bring their concerns regarding their employment to the attention o£ their supervisors and attempt to resolve the issues at the most appropriate level. As noted, it is the City's policy to discuss grievances when the appropriate procedure is followed. The Personnel Rules provide for an appeal through the Administrator when resolution is not satisfactory at the interim steps. As a general policy there is process in the Personnel Ordinance for appeals of any Administrative decision to the Council. This is outlined in Attachment B. It is requested that you again review these items for yourself and with your departmental supervisors together with providing appropriate communication of this policy to all the memoers within your department. Although everyone should have their own copy of the Personnel Rules this refresher may be of assistance to those who have not specifically looked at this section recently. Your cooperation is sincerely appreciated. /!'-rrA'^'tVineruT' 206. BREAKS A Authorized breaks shall begin and end ac me -emp royee's assigned work area. Authorized breaks shall include a break during the first four hours of work, a meal break and the second four hours of work and shall not exceed one hour in total for all breaks in a day. Department Heads are responsible for scheduling such breaks for department personnel and may adopt department rules specifically addressing such breaks. 2g7. PERFORMANCE EVALOATION 1. There shall be a minimum of one (1) written performance review on an annual basis for all regular full-time, regular part- time and for probationary employees as outlined in Section 203. The evaluation will include a review of the employee's major responsibilities, an appraisal of the employee's job performance, identification of any areas needing improvement and an action plan for correction or improvement, including the establishment of future performance objectives. 2. A personal interview between the immediate supervisor and the employee shall be conducted by the supervisor within a reasonable period of time after receipt by the employee of the supervisor s written evaluation. A copy of the written evaluation for eacn regular and probationary employee shall be submitted to the City Administrator for rav-iew and shall be filed in each employee s personnel file. An employee must receive an overall evaluation of "satisfactory" performance to be eligible for a salary performance increase. 208. GRIEVANCE POLICY 1. It shall be the policy of the City that full and free ooportunity for discussion of grievances is encouraged. No punitive action will be taken against an employee who submits a grievance in good faith and follows proper procedure. 2. The City will handle grievances promptly. The grievance procedure will consist of three steps. An emp)oyee snail be deemed to have waived his/her rights under this section if the employee fails to follow the procedures as outlined herein: a. Step One. When a grievance regarding benefits or working circumstances is brought to the attention of the employee's supervisor, that supervisor shall discuss the relevant circumstances with the employee, consider and examine the causes of the grievance, and attempt to resolve it. If the grievance cannot be settled at this level, the grievance shall be reduced to writing by the employee, signed and submitted to the employee's Depart ment Head within twenty (20) days of the initial discussion with the supervisor. b. Step Two. The Depart.Tient Head will discuss the grievance with the employee and give a written decision within ten (10) days of receipt of the written statement. If the employee is not satisfied with the Department Head's decision, the employee may request a meeting with the City Administrator. The grievance to the Administrator shall be submitted in writing by the employee and signed within ten (10) days following the response or passage of the Department Heads's response deadline. c. Step Three. The City Administrator shall explore the nature of the grievance and discuss all relevant circumstances with the employee. The City Administrator shall give a decision in writing within fifteen (15) days of receipt of the written statement of grievance as to whether or not any action will be taken in response to the employee's grievance. 209. DISCIPLIMARY ACTION 1. The method of and procedures for disciplinary action shall be determined by the City Administrator, subject to approval by the City Council if the action involves suspension or termination. 2. Employees may be disciplined in the form of: a. Oral reprimand b. Written reprimand c. Suspensions with or without pay d. Demotion e. Transfer f. Discharge 3. In all cases of suspension, transfer, demotion, or dismissal, the reasons for such action must be presented in a dated, written statement to the employee affected as soon as practicable after the action has taken place. 4. An employee may request a meeting with the City Administrator to discuss any disciplinary action taken against the employee. The employee must submit the request in writing and state the grounds for the request. The City Administrator shall meet with the employee within ten (10) days of receipt of the written request. 5. Cav ’se for disciplinary action including reprimand, suspension, demotion or dismissal shall include but not be limited to any of the following: 3. Develop and issue all adrainistra rules, regulations and procedures necessary to ins functioning of all departments and office Administrator's jurisdiction as'permitted by law and Council approval. C. Prepare and submit an annual budget to the Council and keep the Council advised of the financial condition of the City and make such recommendations as may from time to time be determined desirable and necessary. D. Attend and participate in discussions at all meetings of the Council anc other official bodies as directed by the Council. The City Administrator shall also represent the City at all official or semi-official functions as may ber‘ directed by the Council a» i not in conflict with the prerogatives of the Mayor. E. See the t all laws and provisions of the City code are duly enforced. F. Make cr let purchases and contracts when the^ XT • Li wL Xww OIIUI WlAwAI I amount thereof does not exceed $5,000.00 and to receive estimates, quotations, sealed bids, purchases or contracts excess of $5,000.00 and present them to the Council for official action. ^ G. Recommend from time to time the adoption of such measures as the ’ Adrainis11a tor may deem necessary or expedient for the health, safety and welfare of the corununity or for the improvement of the administration. H. Perform such other duties as may be required by the Council and consistent with Minnesota Statues and the City Code. Subd. 5. Bond Required. The City Administrator shall furnish a surety bond to be approved by the Council, said bond to be conditioned on the faithful performance of those duties. The premium of the bond shall be paid by the City. Subd. 6. Deputy City Clerk. The City Administrator shall, by virture of that position, be a Deputy City Clerk. Subd. 7. General Supervisory Capacity. No member of the Council shall in any manner interfere with, or prevent the City Administrator from exercising the Administrator's own judgement in the administration of the City. Except for the purpose of inquiry, no member of the Council shall deal with or exercise control over the ai-rtinistration of the City, and no member shall give orders to any Department Head or employee of the City, either publicly or privately except through a majority vote of the^'Ceuneri-?.. GHT TO ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL. If any oJ . %* person shall be aggrieved by any administrative decision of the City Administrator or any other City official, or any Board or Commission not having within its structure an established review schedule or an appellate procedure, such aggrieved person is entitled to a full hearing before the Council upon serving a written request therefore upon the Mayor and City Clerk at least seven (7) days prior to any regular Council meeting. Such request shall contain a general statement setting forth the administrative decision to be challenged by the appellant. At such hearing the appellant may present any evidence the appellant deems pertinent to the appeal, but the City shall not be required to keep a verbatim record of the proceedings. The Mayor, or other officer presiding at the hearing, may, in the interest of justice or to comply with time requirements and on the Mayor's own motion or the motion of the appellant, the City Clerk, or a* member of the Council, adjourn the hearing to a more convenient time or place, but such time or place shall be fixed and determined before adjournment so as to avoid the necessity for formal notice of reconvening. An employee of the City who is aggrieved by an action or decision ot another City employee that relates to their employment shall exhaust the grievance procedures set forth in the Administrative and Personnel Policy before requesting a hearing before the City council. SEC. 2.08. ROLES OF PROCEDURE FOR APVriALS AND OTHER HEARINGS. The Council may adopt by resolution certain written rules of procedure to be followed in all administrative appeals and other hearings to be held before the Council or other bodies authorized to hold hearings and determine questions therein presented. Such rules of procedure shall be effective thirty (30) days after adoption and shall be for the purpose of establishing and maintaining order and decorum in the proceedings. SEC. 2.09. FACSIMILE SIGNATURES. The Mayor, City Clerk or Deputy City Clerk, and Treasurer or Deputy City Treasurer are hereby authorized to request a depository of city funds to honor an order for payment when such instrument bears a facsimile of that person's signature, and to charge the same to the account designated thereon or upon which it is drawn, as effectively as though it were the person's manually written signature. Such authority is granted only for the purpose of permitting such officers an economy of time and effort. SEC. 2.10. INTESttM EMERGENCY SUCCESSION. Subd. 1. Purpose. Due to the existing possibility of a nuclear attack or a natural disaster requiring a declaration of a state of emergency, it is found urgent and necessary to insure the continuity of duly elected and lawful leadership of the City to provide for the continuity of the government and the emergency interim succession of key governmental officials by providing a method for temporary emergency appointments to their offices. Subd. 2. Succession to Local Offices. In the event of 1) GQM. SmiNS cm OP onoNO '87 SID - 1987 Oouncil Strategic Planning Short l>em Objective •88 OTO - 1388 Short Term Objective *89 STD - 1989 Short Term Objective fSSSK GOM. ARCT, 1. ooffiNriY oBvaoncKT NKIK B. BBnoiBDSON cm MMDII9BWI0R 1 MMT 1988 - 30 APRIL 1989 OBJBOnVES E?»BS •87 SID Highway 12 A. Ocnprehenslve Plan Amencboent 12 (5/87) DRAFT 4/20/88 5/01/88 5/31/88 6/30/88 7/29/88 8/30/88 9/15/88 Revised for '89 Goal Setting 9/30/88 10/31/88 11/30/88 12/28/88 V31/89 2/28/89 3/31/89 smoB Receive back from Met Oouncil 5A5/88 Extension to 5/15 granted to Metro Oouncil following 4/8/88 meeting ret Urban land demands 5A2/88 approved by Metro Oouncil Metro Oouncil Final plan approval 6/15/88 Pinal Oouncil approval 5/23/88 Zoning Amendments - Draft 6/15/88 - Planning Ooranission 7/1/88consideration - Oouncil consideration 8A0/88 Oontracted with Shardlow 5/23/88 Draft from Sh^u;dlow to Oouncil to PC - 6/27/88 7/6/88 work sesslai on draft 8/1/88 to be 2nd work session st^wduled 8A7/88 Public Hearing - P.C. recoonendatian to Council. Anticipate OouncU 10/10 10/10/88reviewed by Oouncil - Anticipate 11/28 tabled - To present again 1/9 1/5/89 Oouncil requested individual discussions (Held 1/16 - 1/31) 2/27/89 Oouncil ag2dn considers - to 4/10 mtg OOM. Jtfa» !• OOfUNIT^ OEVELGRCNr oont. OBJECTIVES DMBB SnSQS '88 SIO •89 STO B. Corridor Selection Study Negotiations on utilities (Long Lake-Hedina) Ad Hoc Task Force Oonplete Phase 1 Proposed 1991 Inprovement Navarre Redevelopment •88 STO •89 STO Received Itr from Medina re: more sewer/negotiations 6/24/88 Responded with lettei 7/21/88 to Medina 10/1/88 Ad Hoc Task Force - 1st meeting 5A9/88 5/19/88 meeting held 7A8/88 meeting held 8/10/88 meeting held - Reps to contact MOot 9A9/88 meeting held - (MDot Diet. 5 present Re: maxiflUB upgrade in current corridor 10/17 Hi^wey 12 meeting of Mayors - prep foe meeting with Transportation Oennissioner 11/16/88 Meeting with HiDGT Commissioner held Anticipate 1/89 meeting with Coninissioner/ Task Force in vicinity - Currently attempting to set date. 1/9/89 Unofficial Dist 5 ranks Highway 12 as 12 new construction priority 2/9/89 ^k>OOT conversation indicated plan not fined - will contact us %ihen ready 3/30/89 Response to additional inquiry. Will attempt to get group meeting in ^ril/early May possibly 4/27 Receipt of initial response to 1/9/89 Council 1/9/89 Council directs response - Staff to meet with ^tlD0T. 1/24/89 Meeting with MfiDOT/Long Lake Public information mtg by ftiDOT set 4/25/89 E^eige consultants - Planning - Legal Initiate Goal/Objective Setting process Tb be determined 10/1/88 3/25/88 requested quotation from J. Shardlow regarding cost to do master plan development for area. 7/11/98 proposal adopted 10/88 Baae/Background work being done 12/22/88 Planner/Staff held mtg - Anticipate Council presentation 4-5/89 Cosplete Master Plan Study 7/89 Determine Strategy to Inplement 8/89 Consider HRA formation 6/15/88 Soli cite ideas/proa>sals Cumnenoe if Decide u» do 9/1/88 2/88 Request Attorney outline process required to establish 3/1/88 received outlines for establishment of HRA. Staff reviewing for oonnent Mga OUL JOBi 1. 0QMCNIT7 DEVaXPMENT cont. (BJBCnVBS DKDB g na us *87 STO County 15 Oevelopnent *88 STO *89 9TO Determina desired loced aooonpanying iiqprovements Financing plan Conplete construction Speci2d assessment hearing 5/30/88 Issue of lighting to 2/22/88 Council meeting 2/22/88 Council considers lighting 5/23/88 Council approves lifting 5/30/88 Conceptual approvzd 12/14/87 Financied revision propos^ V22/88 3/28/88 tabled to 5/23/88 5/23/88 approved financing 12/1/88 To ooaraence 4/15/88 All curb & gutcer paving & li^ts oonpleted. Spruig '89 balance of sidewalks and restoration Delay to project oonpletion *87 STO Connunlty Transportation Plan *88 SIO Refine capital iaprovement program prior to 89 budget Determine bridge replacement program 88 8/11/88 meetln«a reviewed revised draft 3/1/86 Proposal Included in revised draft capital budget. Request for funding needs to be developed/submitted. Anticipate bridge bonding request to 4/89 Council aaeeting '89 STO Continued analysis Public/Private 8/89 Evaluate Cty 116 7/1/88 3/17/88 received request from Medina 4/25/88 Council elects not to support Resolution 11/28/88 - Cty/Medlna revised 116 to stop at Cty 6 rather than 12. Cty willing to go balance. 1/9/89 - 1/23/89 Council considers options 1/23/89 Council to indicate opposition to County Board. Tabled issue of city action if County goes ahead to 2/27/89 meeting 2/27/89 discussed issue ard again tabled TO Council for further discussion 4/10/89. aOK. MBk cancnvBS DfOES 91MPB 1. COMMUNITY OEVELOmENT oont. ' 87 STO Stom Mater Manageaent Plan •88 STO •89 STO Ocnn nev > Direction and progress •88 STO •89 STD Review advisory/Policy bodies role/Repsonsibilities Review i revise as necessary staff/advisory/policy body process for developnimt review & execution working towards service & results oriented "No Surprises” process Bihanoe effective control on narin2is 7/88 4/11/88 presented to Council. To be reviewed by Planning Coenission 11/88 Anticipate 7/11/88 discussion with Oouncil/PC reps. Tabled to 8/8/88 meeting Rescheduled for 11/88 89 Annual schedule bo include 2 dates 2/6/89 (Mon. evening) and 7/29/89 (Sat. morning) Attenptinr to set Joint Meeting 5/1/89. 12/88 1/9/89 Council directs Marina Committee establishment for 1989. 1/23/89 Council tables to 2/6/89 Joint mtg. 2/6/89 Not discussed. 2. ENViaxtiafEAL PRCTBCnON •87 STO Stubbs Bay •88 ffPO •89 STD Complete needs assessment Project feasibility-connenoe Review Revised Feasibility 2/88 5/88 10/88 Determine assessment area interest Financing options Determine 8/88 10/88 12/88 Anticipate needs assessment oonpletion 2/88 2/22/88 Information presented Submitted request for feasibility update cost Feasibility study approved 6/13/88 Anticipate to 11/28 meeting - Changed to 2/27/89. 1/20/89 Staff reviews significant issues with Attorney. 3/28/89 received Attorney review. 8/8/88 meeting - Council received Consider developoent moratorium 2/89 GCAL ABA GBJBCnVS 91MQB 2, ENTHOtCNIAL PROTOmON OC»t. Solid Maste Manageoent •89 SPO If A^opriate - Initiate project - Project bid - Oommenoe project - Assess project ~ OoR(>Iete project 3/89 4/89 10/89 10/89 Assess recycling efforts to goal 6/88 Assess other avenues to meet goals 6/88 including locad ooqposting Curbside Recycling 10/88 Review regulations regarding solid waste Review organized collection if needed 3/89 9/89 Clt/ in oonjunctlon with Heat Hennepin met '87 goal Currently exploring costs of selected curbside pick up - 8/17/88 staff has tour with potential contractors Presented to Council 10AO 10/24/88 Council directs initiation 12A.V88 contractor selected - Anticipate start prior bo 2/89. 1/28/89 Containers distributed 2/1/89 Program oommenoes QQM.CBJHJfIVBS IWDB 899QS a. QROUlIZXriGNM. UEfTEUJPtVirr 1989 Oouncll Goal Setting CJonmenoe OonpIetB 1989 Budget Process Assessment Board o£ Review Capital budget Adoption Budget Adoption 7/88 9/88 4/B8 8/88 9/26/88 IS 89 Legislative Program Teal Building 4. tSLIVERY •87 STO Facilities Study •88 STO Oonplete Staff Council - Ooisider Formats Undertake if desired Phase II Completion 12/88 11/88 2/89 3/89 6/88 8A1/88 meeting held « *89 revisions Approved 9A2/88 4/27/88 initial meeting held. Anticipate conclusion on 5/9/88 5/19/88 Board concluded 7/11/88 1989 Budget message/ Guidelines to Council Budget meeting set foe 9/20/88 Budget adoptlon/mlll rate to 10/10/88 10/10/88 Mill rate adopted 10/24/88 Budget adopted 10/88 Received AWM policies At 11/28 meeting tabled to 12/12 12/12/88 Adopted Implement any reconmendatiens 7/88 To Planning Conmission for review 5A8/88 Site criteria to Council 9/26/88 Criterla/3rd site adopted 10/10/88 Anticipated to V13/89 meeting Draft analysis received 2/27/89 with follow up 3/8/89 informal meeting 3/8/89 meeting held. Soil borings directed on sites B and C. 3/20/89 Planning Oaomission reviews sites and comments Anticipate questlonaire to neighborhood 4/89. Anticipate liminary costs 5/89. Am OCML Am 4. SERVICE DELIVERY oant. *87 SIO Lang Range Financial Policy *89 SID CBiaSTVES Draft policy to Council 7/88 5. BQHMI RESOUHCIS Golf Course Anijnal Control Ociqpensatian Council adoption Developoent of business strategy Evaluate program 8/88 7/87 8/88 Explore Performance Incentive as addendum to OQopensation plan 8/88 €. MARKETING Ccnnunity Information/ Ne«ialetber Mayor's Articles Evaluation of system Ongoing 8/88 sonoB 2/22/88 Initial draft capital budget discussed 10/10/88 Initial investment guidelines presented. To 12/14 for final review. Adopted investment guideline U/12/B8 1/31/89 City receives GPDA certificate for 1987 Financial Report Extended service to Long LaJee/Spring ParK/MinnetonJea Beach-1988 Ranewed all 3 for 1989 Formal plan to 2/88 Formal plan and adjustments presented 2/22/88 3/25/88 plan adopted 4/12/88 coop worth report submitted to State Submitted 1989 plan bo 12/12/88 1/9/89 Adopted *89 program Mayors*8 Article format to oontinue to 8/88 for next evaluation 8/22/88 Sutaaitted review bo Council 8/22/88 Council directs oontinuanoe of system rm^m 3--tf ijJ6i.0HP™*l Ill ' 1 1 ' m-.', ■54 mSfA-M I '’ttlKiS b -—-■- •V ■ ■''■■’■* - . ^,/:7(: ■,^' - --f^sfe . ^• %-J^ '" - BH E0I AREMOSQUmiS. r$0d i ^^1-1^ - V,' ■•■ w... '■ ->., r.r.M. ■■ ’■t/D •' ■f-k* ^ :TST NGIStANDVEIEIUNS CAMP ON LAI<£ MINNETONKA I If'you re a vet «nd looldng for a quiet place to relax witli family and friends, why not establish a beachhead on a secluded island. .-'• .p6r:i^ information on rates and facilities, write Big Island Veterans Canpp. P.O. Box 598, Excelsior. MN 55331. Or call (612) 474-195a SllSiljf-llla “ iiliriS! >Hi'- HilH iiliiiipWff ■■n 2i' i^r :r"1 • :•' :> * Rtf li5ll iJiHtI «|iPl^liir □ i:^a|a§=« = 2.g)f- it^ii i IIP il«i I lili'iiii llli: ^.ail=lf= = fiiil tfiJiiii illfl III|H:H 5S.£i-a gH-Sg-o^s^'Sfill Ifftlfif ^ =« £• i ■ i-*' - 'V-. >j> -*v^ AsjiM ■ ------------------------------------------ o o B? §• s QTQ ■' / I' % u af- lO- ii \ .r^sqssK^'vmm^Ipw%r.- ^'mM !- . .■ ■ ! v: ■■’ .!/ ;-.?-r^s ■ I . i r 6StZtt ! Noixmosaa W m:- \::‘i V ^^ '%r'' : >v.. A,,;. Twel C. R^iMrad Land Survoy' No.. 4201 Nonnai^ CeunlK Minnaaota. . . _ _ ■ -zne> -/ea. |cb .:Kr>L _. • a7C=;9ajfe_^:i............- ^---------... o.tti n.v/<SZL «/•',<f«isi.:" . . I««s , •••,•... . *. anu LSOD wnttiiK. !K: ‘ ;. |C^vifi^.;4^rrfe fi^ . > ; see 0icfne.iTi H U-N-Q^ coAtPA<ej^o*J ■ ~ E ;'-:e -y ‘ JiN^ s IS ; y!j h/pfuao" S I ill ^/ -V ^PINE RIDGE LANE S^,^=3!CTi~~^>^ggyV a<o«l £^^a-'—i«U4' T,975.00 fvo OUTLOT woo ■ s88’5nrE I~- y r I a 13 s i{ »f fH.H,r./»,K.2i '•.... s : i .S.ft/oliMm. Sttfl'&T - HIvtI-IvV:'';’ //w ,fthtNWik7ihlim^^StdmH 1910.90 %tmt Utt tmt No Nwy+it 5k.J*,T1IB.R » rvo^'>^-^y-''-'‘'‘'''‘‘‘ M I » A'4'/O' ll : „: -A r. a '3 'p.y. *'s "(P^mm&sBm. m TWS t f.y^ c . • ,r-: . ^75 • -*'* -•?ij'‘'‘» •• ^ V * iA- g^-"V¥-v, ■i *:^" SWfZ' mm